Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 2005/04/05
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA April 5,2005 4:00 p.m. Council Chambers Public Services Building 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista ~~ft- ~ r ___ ___ __-__- . - - -- -- ~~~~ CllY OF CHUlA VISTA City Council Patty Davis John McCann Jerry R. Rindone Steve Castaneda Stephen C. Padilla, Mayor City Manager David D. Rowlands, Jr. City Attorney Ann Moore City Clerk Susan Bigelow ********** The City Council meets regularly on the first calendar Tuesday at 4:00 p.m. and on the second, third and fourth calendar Tuesdays at 6:00 p.m. Regular meetings may be viewed at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesdays on Cox Cable Channel 24 or Chula Vista Cable Channel 68. Agendas are available on the City's website at: www.chulavistaca.gov ********** CALL TO ORDER I declare under po,,,_, ,~m employed by the City of Chuls VialS ín the .. of the City Clerk and that I poeted thII _ill -..on!hl bullllln boInIllII Ai~" AGEND;' I 1"'111' 11111. _,_~_\~06 Illl R --------- ,-- 4:00 Uf. ~- April 5, 2005 ------- ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Castaneda, Davis, McCann, Rindone, and Mayor Padilla PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY . INTRODUCTION BY POLICE CHIEF EMERSON OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH, ROBERT CONRAD, COLD CASE FILE INVESTIGATOR . PRESENTATION BY LIZ PURSELL, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS, OF THE DEPARTMENT'S STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN CONSENT CALENDAR (Items I through 10) The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Action Items. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of February 24 and the Regular Meetings of March I and March 8, 2005. Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes. 2. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER II SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND LAND USE DISTRICT MAP, TO DEFINE PERMITTED LAND USES WITHIN A 36-ACRE, NEWLY CREATED DESIGN DISTRICT OVERLAY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF OTAY LAKES ROAD AND FENTON AVENUE/SHOWROOM PLACE WITHIN THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER (SECOND READING) The EastLake Company, LLC submitted an application to I) amend the land use district map in order to add a design district overlay over a 36-acre portion of land with aBC-I land use designation, and define allowable land uses within the overlay area; and 2) amend the design gujdelines to add sign criteria specific for businesses located within the design district overlay. This ordinance was introduced on March 22, 2005. (Director of Planning and Building) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the.ordinance. Page 1 - Council Agenda April 5, 2005 /c. ~al'olqm. mli! ¡'¡¡'¡i;"4 ",c.;. "<_ ",,! 10.:JiIQ of aøMlIlll1neoci IJlløli,¡C .rtt 110 tner'l_lIt 3. RESOLUTION....U_ .W.. .LUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTINÇl.WI¡S AND A W~G A CONTRACT FOR THE UPGRADE OF rJ:,1.JJ:,~1~'1.J1LofUIV1~"'WITH LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) COUNTDOWN CITYWIDE (PROJECT TF-323) TO REPUBLIC ELECTRIC, AND APPROPRIATING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUNDS (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) The upgrade of pedestrian indication (countdown) was approved and budgeted as part of the Fiscal Year 2004/2005 Capital Improvement Programs (CIP). The scope of the project includes the installation of pedestrian countdown LED signal modules and push buttons as a retrofit replacement of existing pedestrian indications and push buttons at twelve signalized intersections in the City. Adoption of the resolution awards the contract in the amount of $42,776, and appropriates $15,000 fiom the Traffic Signal fund in order to complete the project. (Director of General Services, City Engineer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 4. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF SIX GRANT APPLICATIONS TO SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) AND TRANSNET FUNDING FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Transportation Development Act and the TransNet Program provide funding support for regional bicycle and pedestrian capital improvement projects. SANDAG will allocate those project funds to cities in the San Diego region, based upon funding availability and project ranking. Staff has prepared funding applications for six projects. (Director of General Services, City Engineer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 5. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS ON THE COUNTY TAX ROLL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2002-1 (QUINTARD STREET) On July 22, 2003, pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California, Council awarded a construction contract for the construction of sidewalk improvements on Quintard Street between Third Avenue and Orange Avenue. The Council accepted the filing of the Engineer's report on the cost of construction, approved the deferral of the payment of assessments and the rate of interest payable on the unpaid balance of the assessments, and ordered the recordation of a Notice of Lien for the Quintard Street Assessment District. Adoption of the resolution authorizes the collection of the assessments. (Director of General Services) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 6. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY SOUTH BAY BRANCH FOR THE PROVISION OF AFTER- SCHOOL PROGRAM HOURS AT HILLTOP, CHULA VISTA, RANCHO DEL REY AND CASTLE PARK MIDDLE SCHOOLS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT Page 2 - Council Agenda April S, 200S The Recreation Department budget includes funding to contract with the YMCA of San Diego County - South Bay Branch for the provision of after-school services at four middle school sites during non-school hours. The City has contracted withfue YMCA for these services on an annual basis since 1993, when City Council initially approved funding for the newly established Youth Action Program. (Director of Recreation) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 7 A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DESIGN BUILD AGREEMENT WITH SYSTEMS INTEGRATED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION (SCADA) SYSTEM, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH PALOMAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AN ANTENNA AT OTAY MOUNTAIN, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT Systems Integrated is requesting that the completion date be extended by 90 working days for the construction of a Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system, used for controlling and monitoring sewage collection and pump stations throughout the City. The increase in contract time will not impact the contract Guaranteed Maximum Price of $527,750. In addition, to obtain better communication and reliability for the SCADA system, an antenna needs to be installed on Otay Mountain. (public Works Operations) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolutions. 8. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING $18,000 FROM THE CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND APPROPRIATING SAID FUNDS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 SUPPLIES AND SERVICES BUDGET OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT A PROGRAM EVALUATION ON THE BULLYING PREVENTION PROGRAM (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) The Police Department has received additional funding fiom the Chula Vista Elementary School District to support the Bullying Prevention Program funded by the School Community Policing Partnership (SCPP) grant. As stipulated in the grant project narrative, a program evaluation will be conducted on the Bullying Prevention Program to create best practices in the area of bullying prevention. The Chula Vista Elementary School District has recently assigned this task to the Police Department. The Police Department will contract with two bullying prevention experts to conduct this evaluation. (Chief of Police) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. Page 3 - Council Agenda AprilS, 2005 9. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAKING PRELIMINARY DETERMINATIONS AND DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS TO REFUND THE OUTSTANDING BONDS ISSUED FOR CERTAIN EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AND ORDERING A REPORT THEREON The City currently has six assessment districts and ten community facilities districts with outstanding debt. A preliminary review performed by municipal banking firm, Stone & Youngberg, indicates that under the current low interest rate environment, the outstanding debt of two assessment districts and seven community facilities districts may be refinanced in order to achieve significant savings to the property owners on their annual assessments. (Director of Finance) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 10. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $50,000 FOR PARTICIPATING AT THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR PHASE II DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION AND THE OTAY MESA TRANSMISSION PROJECT FROM THE AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND TO THE CONSERVATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT THEREFOR (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) Adoption of the resolution allows staff and outside counsel to continue to participate in workshops and proceedings at the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to support Phase II development of Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), and the City's interest in the Otay Mesa Power Purchase Agreement Transmission Project as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding with SDG&E. (Director of Conservation and Environmental Services) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons speaking during Oral Communications may address the Council on any subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council from taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic for jùture discussion or refer the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Page 4 - Council Agenda April 5, 2005 11. CONSIDERATION OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF CERTAIN DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE SERVICE CHARGES AS RECORDED LIENS UPON THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND AND PLACEMENT OF DELINQUENT CHARGES ON THE NEXT REGULAR TAX BILL FOR COLLECTION Adoption of the resolution enhances the collection process for delinquent solid waste service charges by reducing the amount of uncollectible losses and ensures that payment will be received on a timelier basis. This is the identical process approved by the Council on a regular basis since 2001. (Director of Finance) Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ASSESSING DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE SERVICE CHARGES AS RECORDED LIENS UPON THE RESPECTIVE OWNER-OCCUPIED PARCELS OF LAND· AND APPROVING PLACEMENT OF DELINQUENT CHARGES ON THE NEXT REGULAR TAX BILL 12. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONDUCT A FARMERS' MARKET ON THE CAMPUS OF SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE The applicant, Mr. David Larson, is requesting to conduct a weekly Certified Farmers' Market at Southwestern College, 900 Otay Lakes Road, to be held every Saturday morning in Lot "0" of the college. The market will consist of approximately 45 vendors, 25 of which will be certified agricultural producers. (Director of Planning and Building) Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-05-022 TO CONDUCT A FARMERS' MARKET ON THE CAMPUS OF SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE AT 900 OTAY LAKES ROAD, CHULA VISTA (APPLICANT: DAVID LARSON) 13. CONSIDERATION OF A REVISED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR A PORTION OF OTAY RANCH VII-LAGE SEVEN SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BIRCH ROAD AND LA MEDIA ROAD - OTA Y PROJECT, L.P. (PCS-05-09A) Adoption of the resolution approves an amendment to tentative subdivision map (PCS- 05-09A) for a portion of Otay Ranch Village Seven Sectional Planning Area. (Director of Planning and Building) Page 5 - Council Agenda AprilS, 2005 Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR A PORTION OF THE OTAY RANCH, VILLAGE SEVEN SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN- OTAY PROJECT L.P., CHULA VISTA TRACT 05-09A 14. REVIEW OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM, THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, THE EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT PROGRAM (ESG), AND THE AMERICAN DREAM DOWNPAYMENT PROGRAM, AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SPENDING PLAN FOR THE 2005-2006 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Applications for funding were received fiom local organizations and City departments in January of this year. The public service applicants were invited to present their formal requests to the Council on March 29, 2005. Staff prepared and is presenting funding level recommendations for each of the projects or programs. (Director of Community Development) Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public hearing, approve the funding recommendations provided by staff, and direct staff to include the list of selected activities and funding amounts for the CDBG, HOME and ESG Program in the 2005/2006 Consolidated Annual Plan. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR OTHER BUSINESS 15. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS 16. MAYOR'S REPORTS · Consideration of a request fiom Southwestern College for support and assistance in the 2005 National Youth Sports Program. 17. COUNCIL COMMENTS CLOSED SESSION Announcements of actions taken in Closed Session shall be made available by noon on Wednesday following the Council Meeting at the City Attorney's office in accordance with the Ralph M Brown Act (Government Code 54957.7). Page 6 - Council Agenda April 5, 2005 18. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) A. Wert v. City ofChula Vista [USDC Case No. 03 CVl156J (BLM)] B. Sanchez v. City ofChula Vista [USDC Case No. 04 CV 0084 (DMS)] 19. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(c) . One Case ADJOURNMENT to the Regular Meeting of April 12, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Page 7 - Council Agenda AprilS, 2005 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 5!PE<l/tJ L Item D RDeR.S Meeting Date 4/5/05 ITEM TITLE: Presentation of Office of Communications Strategic Business Plan SUBMITTED BY: Director, Office of Communications 1J,f REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ol! (4/5ths Vote: Yes_ Nox..> The purpose of this report is to submit for Council review, the Strategic Business Plan of the Office of Communications. This plan was developed over a two-month period through the Weidner Consulting Group process, with input fiom a group of ten city departments that use the services of the Office of Communications. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive this report presenting the Office of Communications Strategic Business Plan. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A DISCUSSION: Mission Statement The mission of the Chula Vista Office of Communications is to provide public relations and communication services to the community, City departments and elected officials so they can be knawledgeable and informed about City services, programs and issues. Background During the strategic planning process, which took place over a two-month period, staff members of the Office of Communications crafted a mission statement that summarizes the priorities and responsibilities of our department. The Office of Communications was established as a department in August, 2004. Two months later, we were presented with an opportunity to develop a strategic business plan. We immediately recognized the value of this kind oflong-range planning that helps us measure our effectiveness as we maintain current services and introduce new ones. The staff of Weidner Consulting guided us through this process as we set our goals and key results. While we had a strong sense of the objectives we hoped to achieve, we also wanted to get input from other departments about their needs from the Office of SÆCI4L ORDERS Item Page 2 of 5 4/5/05 Communications. We identified key people fiom ten departments who could provide that feedback. In a group discussion, led by Weidner Consulting, this group of contributors offered their suggestions as to how we can best help them - now and in the future. Their priorities helped us shape our department's strategic business plan. Duties of the Office of Communications As outlined in our mission statement, it is our job to communicate important information about the City's policies, programs and services with residents and employees. We do this in a number of ways. The Office is responsible for producing all city brochures, publications, invitations, flyers, news releases, newspaper articles, some correspondence and mayoral messages, as well as events-related materials and certain advertisements. Most of the City's printed materials that reach the public are designed, written or reviewed by our staff. We also manage media relations, oversee the City's Internet and Intranet Websites, direct the City's Speaker's Bureau and coordinate a growing number of City-sponsored events. The Office provides film and event permitting services, newspaper clipping services and videotape archiving and copying services. Recent· Successes The circulation of Spotlight, the City newsletter, continues to grow rapidly and now reaches approximately 85,000 households. In January, the Office launched a Speakers Bureau designed to educate residents about important projects such as the Bayfront and Urban Core planning efforts and the proposed University Park and Research Center. To date, more than a dozen speaking engagements have been scheduled throughout the city. Also in January, the Office introduced e-Brief, a monthly electronic newsletter that provides timely information about City issues and activities. At the same time, the Office began publishing and updating an electronic City Calendar, which is also hosted on the home page of the City's Web site. We know for a fact that reporters are reading e-Brief and following up on the stories featured there. In conjunction with several community partners, the Office of Communications has taken the lead in organizing "Healthy Lifestyles," a new initiative that promotes the benefits of good nutrition and exercise to our residents. "Healthy Lifestyles" will call attention to the City's acres of public parks and miles ofhiking and biking trails through a monthly series of special events. TheSe events will be coordinated in conjunction with partners such as the local school districts, the Olympic Training Center, Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center and the City's Recreation Department. :3 FE,QJ .4-L Dt<DE£S Item Page 3 of 5 4/5/05 Challenges In keeping with the City Council's commitment to openness and accessibility, we see a need to communicate with a larger number of residents on a more fiequent basis. The cost of additional mass mailing of city publications is prohibitive, and given the current constraints of the existing print and broadcast media outlets, we cannot rely on news coverage to keep the public informed about all the many Chula Vista issues. We are looking for new cost-effective ways to deliver the City's message to the community. As Chula Vista grows, the need for communicating a strong city image to the public will become even more critical than it is now. That will require a professional marketing strategy with an emphasis on additional advertising, outreach and promotions. Strategic Goals Our vision includes developing four strategic goals including: identifying new and alternative modes of communication; planning for a government access cable station; enhancing public communication; and m~n~gjng a city-wide branding and marketing plan. In this era of web-based communication, it is more important than ever for local government to have a Website that caters to all the needs of our residents and visitors. It should be easy to navigate and interactive. Our Website is three years old; by industry standards, that is the normal life span of any design. It is time to begin th;nlciT\g about updating our appearance and the features we provide to users. One feature we would like to introduce is streaming video. Basically, streaming video is video online and at your fingertips. Many cities are presenting and archiving their council meetings online using streaming video. It is a convenient option for residents who have a desire to get involved in local government and hear what their elected leaders are saying. It even allows visitors to select individual agenda items to review or replay. In addition to council meetings, messages, short stories and news updates can be hosted on the Website. Another effective way to share information with residents is to televise government programm;ng to the community. Many cities air council and other public meetings, special events, and locally produced public service programs on their government access channels. It is our recommendation that Chula Vista consider expanding its television capabilities. In light of the City's fiscal constraints, the goals identified in our strategic plan may not be implemented in the immediate future. Our projected time table is the following: . By fiscal year 2008, in order to facilitate public communication, we propose to enhance printed publications and materials by: adding a sixth edition of Spotlight, developing issue-specific materials to educate targeted audiences; and producing an annual year-end report of City accol)1plishments. S'P£;C., A L Item DR.D~S Page 4 of 5 4/5/05 · By 2009, in order to better inform a growing community, we propose redesigning the City's Internet and Intranet Web sites to attract more users; introducing streaming video to the City Web site; developing a subscription database for e- Brief; and expanding the speakers bureau. · In order to help attract business and foster a stronger sense of community, another goal is to manage the design and development of a branding and marketing plan in fiscal year 2009. · Finally, by fiscal year 2009, to reach a more diverse audience with the most current information, we propose to present a completed plan to City decision makers regarding a Chula Vista cable access channel. In the interim, the staff is exploring options for special campaigns such as advertising the City's website inside Chula Vista Transit buses and on city vehicles. We are also planning to produce a variety of video presentations to be ùsed as marketing tools. Key Results As part of the strategic planning process, the Office of Communications developed performance measures to determine whether our goals are being met. They are based on the following: · tracking the number of news releases that are distributed, determining the cost of that distribution, and comparing that cost with the percentage of releases that result in news coverage for the City · tracking the number of publications produced by the department, the cost of those publications and the percentage of recipients who read and/or respond to articles published. · tracking the number of Speakers Bureau events scheduled, the cost of those speaking engagements, the number of people who attend these events and the percentage who report that the event provided valuable information. · tracking the number of special events that are coordinated by the staff, the cost of those events and the percent of spedal event customers who are satisfied with the services provided by the staff. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting this report, but there will be future fiscal impacts depending on how the strategic plan is implemented. On another note, the Office of Communications is considering developing and submitting a proposal to begin charging a fee for the City's block party permits and special event SPf:C-I PH- Item Dt2DGr<.S Page 5 of 5 4/5/05. permits to help offset the costs of administering our permitting program. Based on a fee of $150 for special event permits, we anticipate being able to produce an estimated $5,000 per year. There is also a proposal under consideration to increase the current charge for copies of Council meeting videotapes from $10 to $20. This amount is identical to what the City of San Diego charges and more accurately reflects the cost of retrieving the master tape, loading it into the videotape deck, copying the council meeting in real time and then re-filing the master tape. These proposals will be submitted in a separate document outside the budget process. MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA February 24, 2005 6:00 P.M. An Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and a Special Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista were called to order at 6:15 p.m. at Hedenkamp Elementary School in its multi-purpose room, 930 East Palomar Street, Chula Vista, Califomia. On roll call, there were: PRESENT: Councilmembers: Castaneda, Davis, McCann, Rindone and Mayor Padilla Planning Commissioners: Felber, Hall, Hom, Madrid ABSENT: Planning Commissioners: O'Neill and Chair Cortes ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Moore, City Manager Rowlands, and City Clerk Bigelow 1. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE - REVIEW OF EAST AREA LAND USE This was the second in a series of three General Plan Update (GPU) workshops with the Planning Commission and City Council. It focused on the land use and transportation proposals in eastern Chula Vista and was intended to provide information to, and allow questions and dialog among, the Commissioners and Councilmembers prior to taking final action on the GPU at a public hearing currently set for March 22, 2005. Staff presented an overview of the public issues raised during the Town Hall meetings and reviewed the opportunities and major objectives for the east area land use and transportation proposals in responding to those issues. Staff also discussed three alternatives, along with the final preferred plan and the East Area Plan portion of the General Plan document. Staff then reviewed proposed amendments to the Otay Ranch General Development Plan necessary to implement the preferred alternative. Bill Anderson, representing Economic Research Associates, explained the fiscal and economic considerations of the plan. Barbara Maloney, representing BMS Design Group, discussed the collaborative university concept. Walter Kieser, representing Economic and Planning Systems Incorporated, explained the growth management element ofthe plan. Commissioner Felber recommended that streets be designed to accommodate community destinations, such as schools. He also suggested an analysis of the worst and best case scenarios with regard to transit options. Commissioner Hall expressed concern about potential traffic congestion in the areas proposed for high-density. Commissioner Hom suggested that residents in the area be subsidized in some way to encourage their use of State Route 125. J Page 1 - City CounciIlPlanning Commission Minutes February 24, 2005 GENERAl- PLAN UPDATE (Continued) The following members of the public spoke in response to City staff and the consultants' presentations: Michael McAndrews - Birch Foundation Todd Galarneau - Corky McMillin Companies Theresa Acerro Alice Seebach - Jewels of Charity Margie Phares - representing Helen Peppard Curt Noland - Otay Land Company and Flat Rock Land Company Patricia Aguilar - Crossroads II Kent Aden - Otay Ranch Company Jeff Phair Jim Ambroso - Otay Landfill Terry Thomas Dave Nielsen - Otay Mesa Planning Coalition David Krogh Deputy Mayor Davis expressed the need to work with the high school district to plan a two or three-story high school in order to reduce the 50-acre net land requirement per high school site. Councilrnember McCann believed it was important to work with the high school district on demographics in order to correctly locate high schools in Village 9. He also discussed the need to: I) provide adequate parking for new housing developments to reduce on-street parking, 2) ensure adequate traffic circulation around schools, 3) include La Media in the traffic circulation plan, and 4) implement a jobs/housing balance by bringing a regional teclrnology park to the City that would attract local employment and increase the quality of life for local citizens. Councilrnember Rindone stated that the Metropolitan Transit System, formerly the Metropolitan Transit Development Board, is working on plans to incorporate bus rapid transit into new developments. He also believed that La Media should be included as an essential component of the transit system. No formal City Councilor Planning Commission action was taken on this item. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were none. PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT At 9:09 p.m., Commissioner Madrid adjourned the Planning Commission to the joint workshop with the City Council on March 9, 2005, at 6:00 p.m., at the Loma Verde Recreation Center, 1420 Loma Lane, Chula Vista. CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT At 9:10 p.m., Mayor Padilla adjourned the City Council to its regular meeting of March 1,2005, at 4:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. / J ) ¡W~~ - Sus~ ~igelOw, MMè'; City Clerk Page 2 - City Council/Planning Commission Minutes February 24, 2005 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA March 1,2005 4:00P.M. A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 4:19 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Councilmembers: Castaneda, Davis, McCann, Rindone and Mayor Padilla ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Rowlands, City Attorney Moore, and City Clerk Bigelow PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAl- ORDERS OF THE DAY . INTRODUCTION BY DAVE BYERS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH, KALANI CAMACHO, SENIOR PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR Mayor Padilla read the proclamation, and Deputy Mayor Davis presented it to Kalani Camacho. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 through 6) Councilmember Castaneda requested that Items 4, 5, and 6 be pulled fiom the Consent Calendar for discussion. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of February 15, 2005, and the Joint Council/Planning Commission Meeting of February 15, 2005. Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes. 2. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE Request fiom Councilmember Rindone for an excused absence fiom the February 15, and February 22, 2005 City Council Meetings. Staff recommendation: Council excuse the absences 3 A. ORDINANCE NO. 2995, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECREASING THE SPEED LIMIT ON "1" STREET FROM BAY BOULEVARD TO BROADWAY (SECOND READING) B. ORDINANCE NO. 2996, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING A 25-MPH SPEED LIMIT ON SAINT CLAIRE DRIVE FROM MARQUETTE ROAD TO OTAY LAKES ROAD (SECOND READING) Page 1 - Council Minutes I March 1, 2005 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) Based on provisions of the California Vehicle Code and pursuant to the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the City Engineer has determined that the speed limit on J Street should be decreased to 30 mph between Bay Boulevard and Broadway, and a 25-mph speed limit should be established on St. Claire Drive fiom Marquette Road to Otay Lakes Road. These ordinances were introduced on February 22,2005. (Director of General Services, City Engineer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the ordinances. ACTION: Mayor Padilla moved to approve staffs recommendations and offered Consent Calendar Items 1 through 3, headings read, texts waived. The motion carried 5-0. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were none. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A PROPOSAL TO CONVERT AN EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLEX TO CONDOMINIUM UNITS (SCHOEPFLIN INVESTMENT COMPANY/SUNBOW CORPORATION - PCS 05-03) Schoepflin Investment Company submitted an application for a tentative subdivision map to convert a 202-unit apartment complex to 202 condominium units for individual ownership. The 12.46-acre project site is located at 750 East Naples Court. (Director of Planning ànd Building) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice. Mayor Padilla opened the public hearing. Associate Planner Zumwalt presented the proposed Sunbow Villas condominium conversion project. Councilmember McCann suggested the installation of sub-water meters to encourage water conservation and accountability for water usage by the homeowners. Jim Neil, applicant for the proposed project, stated that the project is ideal for a condominium conversion and has adequate open space and parking. He added that all the residents were contacted individually with respect to their options to purchase the units or to relocate. With no further members of the public wishing to speak, Mayor Padilla closed the public hearing. ACTION: Councilmember McCann offered Resolution No. 2005-067, heading read, text waived: Page 2. - Council Minutes March I, 2005 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) RESOLUTION NO. 2005-067, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO DIVIDE INTEREST IN 12.46 ACRES AT 750 EAST NAPLES COURT FOR A ONE-LOT CONDOMINIUM CONTAINING 202 RESIDENTIAL UNITS (SCHOEPFLIN INVESTMENT COMPANY/SUNBOW CORPORATION) The motion carried 5-0. ACTION ITEMS 8. REPORT REGARDING THE SATISFACTION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 11 BY PROCESSING AND CONSTRUCTING A 243-UNIT HOME OWNERSHIP PROJECT The developer has proposed a 243-unit, mixed-income, for-sale development located in those neighborhoods described as MU-I and R-19 to fulfill its affordable housing obligation. (Director of Community Development) Senior Community Development Specialist Hines presented the proposed Winding Walk affordable housing program. ACTION: Councilmember Rindone moved to accept the report. Mayor Padilla seconded the motion, and it carried 5-0. 9. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PROPERTY DEFACEMENT Adoption of the ordinance creates a year-round graffiti abatement program that addresses graffiti on public and private property by reducing the amount of time allowed for graffiti removal. The program allows City crews to get permission fiom residents and businesses to remove graffiti fiom their property at no cost. (Director of Public Works Operations) Director of Public Works Operations Byers presented the proposed code amendments. Councilmember Rindone expressed concern about citizen privacy rights with respect to graffiti removal by the City on private property. Deputy City Attorney Hanson replied that the proposed ordinance would specifically address regulations for entering private property. Councilmember Rindone requested that constituents be notified of the new graffiti abatement procedures by including an informational newsletter in utility billings. Regarding the proposed four-day requirement for utility companies to remove graffiti fiom their utility boxes, Councilmember Rindone asked what the consequences would be should the graffiti not be removed within that timefiame. Director Byers replied that City staff would remove the graffiti with matching paint supplied by the utility companies and added that he was hopeful that constituents and businesses would be proactive with regard to the program. Councilmember Rindone also asked staff to come back with a progress report within six to nine months after implementing the program. Page 3 - Council Minutes March 1, 2005 ACTION ITEMS (Continued) Scott Alvey, representing SBC, supported the proposed program and urged other utility companies to work collaboratively with the City to provide matching paint for their utility boxes. He also expressed the need to ensure that businesses are not punished for property defacement fiom graffiti when they are, in fact, the victims. Councilmember Castaneda stated that there must be no public perception that the City's aggressive and proactive graffiti eradication program would replace existing police enforcement against graffiti perpetrators. ACTION: Councilmember McCann offered the Ordinance for first reading, heading read, text waived: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.20, RELATING TO PROPERTY DEFACEMENT, INCLUDING GRAFFITI REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS, PENALTIES AND RIGHTS OF THE CITY TO ENTER AND REMOVE GRAFFITI The motion carried 5-0. 10. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS WITH STRATUS, A DNISION OF THE JCM GROUP, FOR THE FORMALIZATION OF CHARTER UNIVERSITY PARTNERS; AND WITH BMS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK LAND USE STRATEGY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PRELIMINARY CAMPUS PLAN CONCEPT FOR THE UNIVERSITY PARK (Continued fiom the Meeting of February 1, 2005) In November 2003, the City Council/Staff University Working Group selected a team of consultants, led by Stratus, to develop a higher education recruitment strategy. Subsequently, the working group requested that the Stratus team present a Phase II planning approach. Adoption of the resolution approves an agreement with Stratus to accomplish specific tracks of the planning approach and with BMS to develop a land use strategy and preliminary campus plan concept for the University Park. (Director of Community Development, Director of Planning and Building) ACTION: Mayor Padilla moved to continue the item to March 8, 2005. Deputy Mayor Davis seconded the motion, and it carried 5-0. 11. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH FITCH & ASSOCIATES, LLC TO CONDUCT A SURVEY RELATED TO ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT AND AMBULANCE TRANSPORT On September 7, 2004, the City Council appropriated funds and authorized the Fire Department to release a request for proposal to conduct an advanced life support and ambulance transport study. The Purchasing Agent received seven proposals. A total of $40,000 was previously appropriated for this study. Adoption of the resolution awards the contract in the amount of $105,800 and appropriates $65,800. (Fire Chief) Mayor Padilla commented that the proposal is only to authorize the study and have staff bring back an analysis ofthat study. No policy decision has been made to proceed with any services. Page 4 - Council Minutes March 1, 2005 ACTION ITEMS (Continued) ACTION: Mayor Padilla offered Resolution No. 2005-068, heading read, text waived: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-068, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AWARDING A CONTRACT TO FITCH & ASSOCIATES, LLC TO CONDUCT AN ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT AND AMBULANCE TRANSPORT STUDY, APPROPRIATING $51,313 FROM THE PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND, AND $14,487 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT The motion carried 5-0. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 4. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-064, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE FORMAL COMPETITIVE BID PROCEDURE AND APPROVING A PRODUCTION AGREEMENT WITH DATAPROSE BILLING SOLUTIONS TO PROVIDE PRINTING AND MAILING SERVICES FOR SEWER BILLS, FROM JANUARY 1,2005 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2005, AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO CONTINUE RENEWING THE AGREEMENT FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS The City has been using DataProse Billing Solutions to print and mail sewer bills for the Sweetwater Authority District since June 2002. DataProse provides a cost-effective, quality service at competitive prices, and to commit to this supplier over an extended period of time ensures that the City continues to receive favorable terms and pricing. (Director of Finance) Councilmember Castaneda expressed concern about waiving the formal bidding process and authorizing the renewal of services for an additional five-year period, stating that citizens warrant the best services at the best prices. To that end, he requested that the City solicit requests for proposals fiom the business community. Deputy Mayor Davis clarified that the renewal date for the initial period of the agreement would be fiom February 22, 2005 through February 21, 2006. ACTION: Councilmember Castaneda moved to amend the resolution to renew the agreement for the period of February 22,2005 through February 21,2006, and to delete the portion of the resolution that authorizes the Director of Finance to continue renewing the agreement for the next five years. Mayor Padilla seconded the motion, and it carried 5-0. Mayor Padilla moved to adopt Resolution No. 2005-064 as amended, heading read, text waived. The motion carried 5-0. ACTION: Councilmember Rindone asked staff to explore opportunities to work jointly with the Sweetwater District on sewer billing services. Page 5 - Council Minutes March I, 2005 ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) 5. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-065, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE SOUTH CHULA VISTA LffiRARY PROJECT (PAINT), IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA (pROJECT NO. LBI25), AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT On March 2, 2005, the Director of General Services received sealed bids for this project. The work to be done consists of repainting the entire exterior of the facility as necessary to correct the color deterioration of the exterior walls and stucco. (Director of General Services) Councilmember Castaneda observed that the recommended bid for the project was 21 percent lower than the other bids received, and the vendor is located in Huntington Beach, California. He questioned the need for safeguards to ensure that the work is done properly. General Services Director Griffin responded that there are clear specifications in place in terms of materials and timefiame for completion of the project. ACTION: Councilmember Castaneda offered Resolution No. 2005-065, heading read, text waived. The motion carried 5-0. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-066, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING $70,224 FROM THE OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 POLICE BUDGET FOR THE SOBRIETY CHECKPOINT PROGRAM, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR The Police Department received funding fiom the Office of Traffic Safety for the Sobriety Checkpoint Program, with the goal of reducing the number of victims killed and injured in alcohol-involved collisions. The Department will conduct 12 sobriety checkpoints during a thirteen-month period, which encompasses three "You Drink and Drive. You Lose" statewide and national mobilization periods. (Chief of Police) Councilmember Castaneda requested and was given confirmation that the $70,224 would be allocated for the sobriety checkpoint program and that the recent allocation of $250,000 for "Operation Safe Neighborhoods" would be utilized in full for crime suppression purposes. ACTION: Councilmember Castaneda offered Resolution No. 2005-066, heading read, text waived. The motion carried 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS 12. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS City Manager Rowlands announced that a Council Meeting would be held on March 29,2005, at 6:00 p.m., in Council Chambers, for the purposes of conducting a public hearing for the Community Development Block Grant Program. Page 6 - Council Minutes March I, 2005 OTHER BUSINESS (Continued) 13. MAYOR'S REPORTS There were none. 14. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember McCann reminded staff and Councilmembers to ensure that the Bayshore Bikeway is kept on the map. He also spoke of the success of the recent Kiwanis auction event that he attended. CLOSED SESSION 15. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957 . Assistant City Managers ACTION: Ratification of appointment of City Manager Assistant. 16. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 . One Case This item was not discussed, and no action was taken. 17. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) A. Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista v. de Flores, et al. (SDSC Case No. GIC 827799-1) No reportable action was taken on this item. B. City of Chula Vista v. B.P. West Coast Products, LLC, et al. (SDSC Case No. GIC 836505-1) No reportable action was taken on this item. ADJOURNMENT At 7:00 p.m., Mayor Padilla adjourned the meeting to the Regular Meeting of March 8, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, and thence to an Adjourned Regular Meeting with the Planning Commission on March 9, 2005 at the Loma Verde Recreation Center. ~w- ;;;;;fŠ~ Susan Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk Page 7 - Council Mioutes March 1, 2005 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA March 8, 2005 6:00 P.M. A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 6:04 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. . ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Councilmembers: Castaneda, Davis, McCann, Rindone and Mayor Padilla (arrived at 6:25 p.m.) ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Rowlands, City Attorney Moore, and City Clerk Bigelow PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY . INTRODUCTION BY POLICE CHIEF EMERSON OF RECENTLY PROMOTED AGENTS, JIM FILLIUS, ERIK NA V A, JOE PICONE, RUSTY REA, AND PETE STEVENS Police Chief Emerson introduced the recently promoted Agents and presented them with their badges. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 through 8) Councilmember Rindone requested that Item 4 be pulled fiom the Consent Calendar for discussion. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of February 22,2005. Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 2997, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.20, RELATING TO PROPERTY DEFACEMENT, INCLUDING GRAFFITI REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS, PENALTIES AND RIGHTS OF THE CITY TO ENTER AND REMOVE GRAFFITI (SECOND READING) Adoption of the ordinance creates a year-round graffiti abatement program that addresses graffiti on public and private property by reducing the amount of time allowed for graffiti removal. The program allows City crews to get permission fiom residents and businesses to remove graffiti fiom their property at no cost. This ordinance was introduced March 1, 2005. (Director of Public Works Operations) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the ordinance. Page 1 - Council Minutes / March 8, 2005 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) 3. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-069, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2005 LIBRARY DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY $3,000 BASED ON UNANTICIPATED ONE-TIME GRANT AUGMENTATION FOR EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE LITERACY PROGRAM The California Department of Education recently notified the Chula Vista Literacy Team ofa one-time augmentation in the amount of $3,000 in Workforce Investment Act (WIA) 231 Grant funds for the fiscal year 2005. (Assistant City Manager Palmer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-071, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A DONATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000 FROM THE STEPHEN & MARY BIRCH FOUNDATION TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, APPROPRIATING SAID DONATED FUNDS, AND APPROPRIATING $5,037 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE PURCHASE OF A FIRE SAFETY HOUSE The Fire Department received a donation in the amount of $50,000 fiom the Stephen & Mary Birch Foundation. The donation will be used to purchase a fire safety house. (Fire Chief) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 6 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-072, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2005 POLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL SERVICES BUDGET TO RECLASSIFY THE CALIFORNIA BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP (CBAG) NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR TO CBAG NETWORK MANAGER, RECLASSIFY THE POSITION OF CBAG NETWORK ASSISTANT TO CBAG NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR I, CREATE A NEW POSITION OF CBAG NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR II, CREATE A NEW POSITION OF CBAG GRAPHICS DESIGNERlWEB MASTER, ADD ONE CBAG ANALYST; AND APPROPRIATE $120,492 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND BASED UPON UNANTICIPATED REVENUES B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.05.010 RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF UNCLASSIFIED POSITIONS (FIRST READING) The California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) has requested several classification updates and additions. The full cost for those reclassifications and additions will be paid for by CBAG. Adoption of the resolution also approves the Police Department's request for the addition of the positions of CBAG Network Administrator I, CBAG Network Administrator II, CBAG Network Manager, CBAG Graphics Designer/Webmaster and the deletion of the positions of CBAG Network Admmistrator and CBAG Network Assistant. Additionally, Chula Vista City Charter section 500 requires that all unclassified positions not mentioned specifically in Charter section 500 be adopted by Ordinance. (Chief of Police) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution and place the ordinance on first reading. Page 2 - Council Minutes March 8, 2005 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) 7. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-073, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF ASSIGNABLE ACCESS EASEMENTS AND IRREVOCABLE OFFERS OF DEDICATION ASSOCIATED WITH LOTS "P", "Q", "R", "C" AND "D" OF SUBDIVISION MAP 14853 AND LOTS "0" AND "A" OF SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 14261; AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD SAID SUMMARY VACATION FOR EACH LOT INDIVIDUALLY PRIOR TO THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ACCEPTANCE OF EACH LOT The Council previously approved the "A" maps for San Miguel Ranch. The subdivision maps created certain open space lots to preserve habitat and the developer irrevocably offered to dedicate these lots to the City. Adoption of the resolution authorizes the City Clerk to record instruments to terminate the City's interest in the preserve lots in accordance with the California Government Code and the California Streets and Highways Codes so that the developer (NNP Trimark) can transfer them to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (Director of General Services, City Engineer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 8. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-074, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FINAL "A" MAP OF CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 05-07, MCMILLIN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE SEVEN; ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, THE EASEMENTS GRANTED ON SAID MAP WITHIN SAID SUBDIVISIONS; ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE PUBLIC STREETS SHOWN THEREON; APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY SAID SUBDIVISION; APPROVING THE ASSOCIATED SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT; REQUIRING DEVELOPER TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNFULFILLED CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 2004-331 Council previously approved a tentative subdivision map for Otay Ranch Village Seven, Chu1a Vista Tract No. 05-07. Adoption of the resolution approves the McMillin Otay Ranch Village Seven "A" Map, its associated subdivision improvement agreement, supplemental subdivision improvement agreement, and an addendum to the Otay Ranch Village Seven sectional planning area plan to allow the issuance of building permits in Village Seven prior to the opening of SR-125. (Director of General Services, City Engineer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. ACTION: Deputy Mayor Davis moved to approve staffs recommendations and offered Consent Calendar Items 1 through 3 and 5 through 8, headings read, texts waived. The motion carried 4-0, with Mayor Padilla absent. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were none. Page 3 - Council Minutes March 8, 2005 PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND AN URGENCY ORDINANCE MODIFYING THE EXISTING TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AND AMENDING CHAPTER 3.54 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE The City's Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Program was established on January 12, 1988. Since its inception, the program has been updated several times to reflect new land use approvals and updated project cost estimates. The last TDIF update was approved on August 13,2002. Adoption of the ordinances approves the 2005 TDIF update, including an increase fiom the current fee of $8,825 to $10,400 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The proposed Urgency Ordinance enables the City to collect the fee immediately after the adoption of proposed General Plan. (Director of General Services, City Engineer) ACTION: Councilmember McCann moved to continue the hearing to a future date. CounciImember Castaneda seconded the motion, and it carried 4-0. 10. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER II SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, DESIGN GUIDELINES AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS (pCM-04-16; THE EASTAKE COMPANY LLC) The EastLake Company, LLC submitted an application to I) amend the land use district map in order to add a design district overlay over a 36-acre portion ofland with aBC-I land use designation, and define allowable land uses within the overlay area; and 2) amend the design guidelines to add sign criteria specific for businesses located within the design district overlay. (Director of Planning and Building) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and at the time specified in the notice. Mayor Padilla opened the public hearing. There were no members of the public who wished to speak. ACTION: CounciImember Castaneda moved to continue the public hearing to the meeting of March 22,2005. CounciImember McCann seconded the motion, and it carried 4-0. ACTION ITEMS 1 I. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS WITH STRATUS, A DNISION OF THE JCM GROUP, FOR THE FORMALIZATION OF CHARTER UNIVERSITY PARTNERS; AND WITH BMS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK LAND USE STRATEGY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PRELIMINARY CAMPUS PLAN CONCEPT FOR THE UNNERSITY PARK (Continued fiom the Meeting of March 1, 2005) Page 4 - Council Mioutes March 8, 2005 ACTION ITEMS (Continued) In February 2004, the City CounciI/StaffUniversity Working Group selected a team of consultants, led by STRATUS, and including BMS as a sub-contractor, to develop a higher education recruitment strategy. Subsequently, the working group requested that staff and the consultants present a Phase II planning approach. Adoption of the resolutions appoints a Blue Ribbon Committee to advise the City Council on the University Park and Research Center planning and waives the formal consultant selection process and grants agreements with STRATUS to accomplish specific tracks of the planning approach, and with BMS to develop a fiamework land use strategy and preliminary campus plan concept for the University Park. (Director of Community Development, Director of Planning and Building) Economic Development Manager Stone introduced the Blue Ribbon Committee members. He then gave a presentation on the University Park and Research Center project and stated that staff would return to Council with status reports in May and August, 2005. Dr. Lee Kerschner, Blue Ribbon Committee Chairperson, thanked the Council for the opportunity to serve on the proposed committee, stating that the university concept plan is an exciting one, and he looks forward to reporting back to the Council with progress reports. ACTION: Mayor Padilla then offered Resolution Nos. 2005-075,2005-076, and 2005-077, headings read, texts waived: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-075, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FORMING A BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE OF DISTINGUISHED INDIVIDUALS TO ADVISE THE CITY ON MATTERS RELATED TO THE PLANNING OF THE UNIVERSITY PARK AND RESEARCH CENTER RESOLUTION NO. 2005-076, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE FORMAL CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS AND GRANTING AN AGREEMENT WITH STRATUS, A DIVISION OF THE JCM GROUP, FOR THE FORMALIZATION OF CHARTER UNIVERSITY PARTNERS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF KEY COLLABORATION, BUSINESS AND ACADEMIC PLANS BETWEEN AND AMONG THOSE PARTNERS, AND APPROPRIATING $451,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THESE TASKS RESOLUTION NO. 2005-077, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE FORMAL CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS AND GRANTING AN AGREEMENT WITH BMS DESIGN GROUP FOR THE PREPARATION OF A FRAMEWORK LAND USE STRATEGY AND THE PREPARATION OF A PRELIMINARY CAMPUS PLAN CONCEPT FOR THE UNIVERSITY PARK, AND APPROPRIATING $256,245 FROM THE AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THESE TASKS The motion carried 5-0. Page 5 - Council Minutes March 8, 2005 ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 4. RESOLUTION NO. 2005-070, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING A LIBRARIAN I/II AND A (.5) LIBRARY TECHNICIAN TO THE LIBRARY DEPARTMENT BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THERFOR BASED UPON UNANTICIPATED REIMBURSABLE REVENUES The General Services and Library Departments are proceeding with plans to build the Rancho del Rey Branch Library as proposed in the Library Master Plan. Public Facilities Development Impact fees have been collected for this project and will allow the City to construct a 30,000 square-foot branch library. It is anticipated that design work will begin this spring, construction in spring 2006, and the branch will open in spring 2007. (Assistant City Manager Palmer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. Councilmember Rindone expressed concern about the hiring of additional Library staff for the Rancho del Rey Branch Library so early in the process. Assistant City Manager Palmer responded that the anticipated purchase of 100,000 books for the new library is extremely time- consuming, since each book is purchased and reviewed individually by staff. ACTION: Councilmember Rindone then offered Resolution No. 2005-070, heading read, text waived. The motion carried 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS 12. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS There were none. 13. MAYOR'S REPORTS Mayor Padilla reported that he, City Manager Rowlands and Director of Conservation and Environmental Services Meacham met with the president of the California Public Utilities Commission to reassert the City's position on the preferred fiamework regarding community choice aggregation. He stated that the meeting was productive and that he would submit a written report to the Council. Mayor Padilla also spoke regarding the City's participation at a recent SANDAG meeting with respect to housing programs in the regional comprehensive plan and the ability of various jurisdictions to provide low-moderate income housing. He reported that the City was successful in obtaining minor amendments to the program language regarding TRANSNET and funding for transportation around the region that addresses incentives for sustainable growth policies. He stated that a report would be forthcoming to Council. Page 6 - Council Minutes March 8, 2005 OTHER BUSINESS (Continued) 14. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Castaneda spoke regarding the memorandum submitted to the Council about the emergency drainage facility repair work on First Avenue, between H Street and Shasta Street, and requested assurance that the affected citizens in the area were adequately notified. Director of Public Works Operations Byers responded that a preliminary notice has been given, and [mal notification will be distributed to all affected citizens upon confirmation of the work schedule. Councilmember Castaneda spoke about citizens' concerns regarding the backup of traffic on 1- 805 and associated safety issues with regard to the road widening project on 1-805 at the Orange Street/Olympic Parkway overpass. He asked staff to work with CalTrans on ways to ease the congestion and address the safety concerns and to return to the Council with a report. CounciImember Castaneda requested that emergency and permanent ordinances to establish a use permit process to regulate the location and operation of check cashing establishments be brought forward to the Council as soon as possible. Councilmember McCann stated that he recently participated in the "Read Across America" program at Rosebank Elementary School, and he acknowledged former Councilmember Salas' presence at the event. He then asked Councilmember Rindone to provide the dates for upcoming public workshops regarding the creation of a common calendar for local elementary, middle and high schools. Councilmember Rindone announced that six community workshops are scheduled. The first workshop will be held on April 6, 2005, at 6:30 p.m., at Chula Vista High School, followed by meetings on April 13 , 20, 27, and May 4, and 11, at various school locations. CLOSED SESSION 15. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957 . Assistant City Managers No reportable action was taken on this item. 16. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) A. Wert v. City ofChula Vista [USDC Case No. 03 CVl156J (BLM)] B. Sidock v. City of Chula Vista (SDSC Case No. GIS 15970) These items were not discussed, and no action was taken. ADJOURNMENT At 7:45 p.m., Mayor Padilla adjourned the meeting to the Regular Meeting of March 22,2005, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, and thence to an Adjourned Regnlar Meeting with the Planning Commission on March 22,2005 at 7:00 p.m. -=--WL... ~J Q ~ . Susan Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk Page 7 - Council Minutes March 8, 2005 ORDINANCE NO. t>-DO?í\O~ t..'\) ~'é.t>.\)\~G t>.~D ß<¿COr. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER II SUPPLEMRNTAL SPA PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND LAND USE DISTRICTS MAP, TO DEFINE PERMITTED LAND USES WITBJN A 36 ACRE NEWLY CREATED DESIGN DISTRICT OVERLAY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF OTAY LAKES ROAD AND FENTON AVENUE/SHOWROOM PLACE WITHIN THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER. I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is subject matter of this Ordinance is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and co=only known as the Design District Overlay within the EastLake Business Center, and for the purpose of general description herein consists of approximately 36 acres located at the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and Fenton Avenue/Showroom Place (fo=erly Girard Place). ("Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a SPA amendment was filed with the Planning and Building Department on May 19, 2004, by The EastLake Company LLC requesting approval of amendments to the EastLake Business Center II Supplemental SPA Planned Co=unity District Regulations and Land Use District Map and Design Guidelines to 1) add a new section to the PC District Regulations clarifying the allowable land uses for businesses located within a newly created Design District Overlay, 2) amend the Design Guidelines to add a new section containing sign guidelines applicable only for those businesses located within the Design District Overlay. ("Projèct); and, C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements, including: 1) a General Plan Amendment, General Development Plan and Sectional Planning Area Plan and associated Design Guidelines, Public Facilities Financing Plan and Comprehensive Affordable Housing Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 2002-264 on July 23,2002; and 2) Planned Co=unity District Regulations approved by Ordinance No. 22863 on August 6,2002; and 2-1 Page 2 D. Planning Commission Record on Applications WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on February 23,2005, and after staff presentation and public testimony, voted 5-0-1 to recommend that the City Council approve the Proj ect, in accordance with the findings listed below; and E. City Council Record of Applications WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City ofChula Vista on March 8, 2005, on the Project and to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said Planned Community District Regulations amendment application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the project at least ten-days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 4:00 p.m. March 8, 2005, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the hearing was continued to March 22, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on this Project held on February 21, 2005, and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceedings. III. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has determined that the proposed project was adequately covered in the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration for the EastLake II General Development Plan (GDP) and EastLake I Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan 2-2 Page 3 Amendments (IS-00-03) and the associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Thus, no further enviro=ental review or documentation is necessary. N. FINDINGS FOR PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE DISTRICTS MAP AMENDMENT The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendments to the EastLake Business Center II Planned Co=unity Districts Map are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and will provide an overlay area in which business related to home improvement can congregate with built in safeguards to prevent incompatible land uses from taking place within said overlay; and that public necessity, convenience, the general welfare and good zoning practice support the amendment. V. APPROVAL Based on the above, the City Council hereby approves the proposed amendments to the EastLake Business Center II Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map as depicted in Exhibit "B" and Exhibit "C"attached hereto. VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Ordinance is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court 'Of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this Ordinance shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. VII. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day fiom and after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by Jim Sandoval Director of Planning and Building 2-3 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ... Item ,5 Meeting Date 04/05/05 ITEM TITLE: Resolution accepting bids and awarding a contract for the Upgrade of Pedestrian Indications with Light Emitting Diode (LED) Countdown - Citywide (TF-323) project to Republic Electric and appropriating Traffic Signal funds SUBMITTED BY: Director of General Services/City Engineer ~ CitYManager~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes x... No--.J REVIEWED BY: The upgrade of pedestrian indication (countdown) was approved and budgeted as part of the FY 2004-2005 Capital Improvement Programs (CIP). The scope of the project (TF-323) includes the installation of pedestrian countdown LED signal modules and push buttons as a retrofit replacement of existing pedestrian indications and push buttons at twelve signalized intersection in the City. Tonight, Council will consider accepting the bid and awarding the contract for the subject project to Republic Electric in the amount of $42,776. In addition, Council will consider appropriating $15,000 fiom the Traffic Signal fund needed to complete the project. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopts the resolution. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Staff submitted the above CIP project to continuously improve the safety of pedestrian crossing at the City's signalized intersection. Countdown pedestrian indication features additional information of the time left before the pedestrian phase terminates. It displays a sequential countdown in seconds fiom the start of the flashing "Don't Walk" indication until the steady "Don't Walk" indication is displayed. This will provide additional clearance time information to help pedestrians decide whether to start the crossing or wait to the next "Walk" indication. There are four intersections equipped with these countdown indications within the City and, of which, staff have received favorable comments fiom citizens. They are located at Medical Center Drive/East Naples Street, Medical Center Drive/Medical Center Court, First AvenueIPalomar Street, and East J Street/Paseo Del Rey. Staff has established a priority list of 21 intersections that qualify for the proposed upgrade. Said intersections were selected based on the following general criteria: . Intersections located within the vicinity of hospitals, shopping centers, senior residential complexes and government facilities (library and civic center). . Intersections with predominant volumes of mature pedestrian traffic. 3-1 Page 2, Item 3 Meeting Date 04/05/05 · Intersections with a high number of pedestrian accidents that may be reduced as a result of the upgrade. Said 21 intersections were ranked using a scoring system that includes average daily traffic (ADT), speed, number of lanes, and the number of pedestrian accidents. Due to funding constrains, the subject project only includes upgrading the 12 top ranked intersections (See Attachment 1). Scope of work Summary: The project includes the following general activities: · Furnish and Installation of pedestrian LED indications (Countdown) at 12 intersections · Removal and salvage of certain existing improvements · Replacement of existing push buttons · Cable replacement · Protection and restoration of existing improvements · Removal and disposal of certain improvements · Traffic control during construction On February 16, 2005, bids were received fiom the following contractors: 11_~I!!!!ra~~or_______________._______ 1------- Bid Amount . Republic Electric, (Novato, CA) $42,776 HMS Construction, Inc. (San Marcos, CA) $62,688 ---S·~th~~li~C~t;~~t;;g:fu¿. '(E¡-c~i~-;:-CA)-'----------- _____.____n___._________..._____.__ $64,300 f-----.--. $65,800 ABC Grading & Paving a Joint Venture dba ACE Electric/ABC Construction, (San Diego, CA) T & M Electric, (Santee, CA) $70,080 The low bid, submitted by Republic Electric, is below the final engineer's estimate of$73,200 by $30,424. This significant reduction may be due to the fact that City staff typically uses conservative unit prices for determining a project's cost estimate. Nevertheless, due to the significant difference between Republic Electric and the other bidders, staff proceeded to carefully verify the contractor's work references. Currently they have contracts with the Cities of La Mesa, Poway, Lemon Grove, Santee, and El Cajon for the maintenance of streetlights and traffic signals. Based on the satisfactory results of the reference check and considering the limited scope of work of the proposed proj ect (i.e., similar work to be performed at each ofthe twelve locations), staff considers that Republic Electric's work performance history is acceptable and recommends awarding the subject contract. Disclosure Statement: The Contractor's Disclosure Statement is provided as Attachment 2. Environmental Status: The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 1 categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA 3-2 Page 3, Item .3 Meeting Date 04/05/05 Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. ADDITIONAL PROJECT: Funds for this project were previously used to install the first two lighted pedestrians crosswalks in the City, powered by solar energy, at the following mid-block locations: I) Third Avenue between G Street and F Street, and 2) F Street between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue, in the combined amount of $46,569. Due to unique characteristics of this emerging technology, the City first purchased the equipment fiom a specialized vendor and later retained Perry Electric Contractors for performing the field installation during late February 2005. Future installations at other City locations will depend upon subsequent assessment of the equipment's performance, impact to vehicular traffic, and benefits to pedestrian safety. FISCAL IMPACT: -- FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount (Republic Electric) $ 42,776 B. Approximately 10% Contingencies $ 4,655 C. Staff Costs; Design; Inspection $ 21,000 D. Funds used to Install Two Existing Pedestrian Lighted Crosswalks· $ 46,569 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $115,000 .........,-....--.....---..---- FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Traffic Signal Fund $ 100,000 B. Additional Traffic Signal Appropriation $ 15,000 I TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $115,000 Approval of this resolution will appropriate $15,000 in additional Traffic Signal funds to complete the project. There are no impacts to the General Fund, and the available balance of the Traffic Signal Fund is sufficient to allow the appropriation. There are no additional energy and maintenance costs at each intersection as a result of this proj ect. Attachments: I: Priority List for Pedestrian Countdown Indication Upgrade 2: Contractor's Disclosure Statement 1: IEngineerlAGENDA ITF323A 113.m/em.doe 3-3 ATTACHMENT 1 PRIORITY LISTING FOR PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN INDICATION UPGRADE RANK SCORE INTERSECTION LOCATION LOCATION WITHIN THE VICINITY OF 1 66 BROADWAYIH ST Chula Vista Business Center 2 62 EASTLAKE PWIOTAY LAKES RD Villane Center (New) 3 56 PALOMAR ST/ORANGE Palomar Trollev Station 4 54 4TH AVElH ST ScrlDDs Memorial HosDital 5 54 BROADWAY/E ST Feaster Edison Elem Sch 6 50 H ST/HIDDEN VISTA DR Terra Nova Plaza 7 48 OTAY LAKES RD/CANYON DR Bonita Vista Middle & Hiah School 8 45 BROADWAYII ST Chula Vista Business Center 9 44 3RD AVElH ST Gatewav Chula VistalCounlv Blda 10 44 BONITA/OTAY LAKES RD ShODDlna Center/Gall Course 11 43 5TH AVE/H ST CV Ctr, CV Mid. & Vista Sauare Elem. 12 43 OTAY LAKES RD/GOTHAM Southwestern Colletle 13 43 PALOMAR/MURRELL Palomar Trolley Station 14 39 EASTLAKE DR/E ST School 15 39 3RDAVElG ST Downtown Chala Vista 16 36 3RD A VE/E ST Downtown Chule Vista 17 36 3RD A VEIl ST Countv Bldo . 18 33 3RD A VElC ST Shonn/nn Cente,. (New) 19 31 4TH A VEIF ST Civic Center and Librarv 20 29 3RD A VElF ST Downtown Chula Vista 21 28 BONITA RDIALLEN SCH RD AnBrtments & S/1noo/na Center FILE: 0735-10-TF323 03/29/2005 3-4 A IT ACHMENT 2 CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Co=ission and all other official bodies of the City, a stat=ent of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filed. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subj ect of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. WADE WHfTË J""E FF AstH "(jlJ¡mes WPt6rvEP-- dYtm 55 REFD ŒNN G W~1HFA--) . 2. If anyperson;¡' identified pUÌ"Suantto (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals With a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity. ~'Y . 3. If any person" identified pursuant to (I) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or . trustor of the trust. ~~ 4. Please identify· every. person; including any agents, =ployees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. ~¥ 5. Has any person" associated With this contract had any [mancial dealings With an official"" of)ìt€ City ofChula Vista as it relates to this contract Within the past 12 months? Yes~ No'ý'" ~y \\Citywide2000IhomeIEngineer\TRAFFlClACAD Dwgs\CIP P~à1Efu-S\Tf-323\TF -323Specs_doc If Yes, briefly descnòe the nature of the financial interest the official" may bave in tJris contract. ~ /U 6. Have you made a contnòution of more than $2~ within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chula Vista City COlJIlcil? No~ Yes _ If yes, which COlJIlcil member? 7. Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official" of the City of Chula Vista in the past twelve (12) months? (Thi§ includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes _ No...£... If Yes, which offi~al ** and what.was .tM .nature o~rovided? ff - Date: 1- ;/>ò)- Si ature of Contractor/ Ap þ~)é¿ M/t7E· .?/&S/Jcyv'¡ Print or type name of Contractor/Applicant . Person is defmed as: any individual, fJIm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fiaternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other COlJIlty, city, municipality, district, or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. .. Official includes, but is not limited to:' Mayor, COlJIlcil member, Planning Commissioner, Member ofa board, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members. 1~-6 IICitywide2000lhomelEngineerlTRAFFIClACAD DwgslCIP PROJECTSI Tf- 3 231TF -3 23 SDecs.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2005- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE UPGRADE OF PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS WITH LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) COUNTDOWN - CITYWIDE (TF-323), TO REPUBLIC ELECTRIC AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS WHEREAS, on February 16, 2005, the City Engineer received sealed bids for the Upgrade of Pedestrian Indications with Light Emitting Diode (LED) Countdown - Citywide (TF-323); and WHEREAS, five contractors submitted bids to perform the work as follows: ~--_..,-_..._-_. , .---'---:-', ---.------..- Contractor . ! Bid Amount Î . Republic Electric, (Novato, CA) ·------------T- $42,776 ~ ¡..-----.-.-----.--.-..-----;---- . , ------·-·-1'-··----------------·-----11 I HMS ConstructiOn, Inc. (San Marcos, CA) : $62,688 :1 ~ i!1 , I ., I Sutherlin Contracting, Inc. (El Cajon, CA) : $64,300 ,I . , jI'"""___.__.____...._____.....____..______..___.._____.__ ..__._m___._.____.._______,_ __.____" Ii AEC Grading & Paving a Joint Venture dba ACE i $65,800 î ..........-~--,._,-------._.-.---._.--.~.-. , ---···---··-4------·---------·------··-·1 ~ T & M Electric, (Santee, CA) I $70,080 Ii WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the low bid and recommends awarding the contract to Republic Electric in the amount of $42,776; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Division staff checked references required by the project specifications that the contractor submitted. All references checked were verified and their work has been satisfactory; and WHEREAS, $100,000 was originally approved for design, construction inspection, and contract administration of the project in the CIP fiscal year 2004-2005; and WHEREAS, funds for the project were already used for the installation of solar crosswalks at two mid-block locations; Third Avenue between G Street and F Street and F Street between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue in the approximate amount of $47,000 which leaves a remaining amount of$53,000; and WHEREAS, staff has determined that additional funds in the amount of $15,000 are needed to complete the construction inspection, and contract administration for the TF-323 proj ect; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Traffic Signal Fund for the additional requirement; and 3-7 WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class I categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept bids and award the contract for the Upgrade of Pedestrian Indications with Light Emitting Diode (LED) Countdown - Citywide (TF-323) in the amount of $42,776 and appropriate $15,000 fiom the Traffic Signal Fund to complete the project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contracts on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by Y::L 7, H---- Ann Moore City Attorney Jack Griffm Director of General Services 3-8 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 4- Meeting Date 04/ÓS/OS . ITEM TITLE: Resolution approving the submittal of TDA and TransNet funding applications to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) for FY 2005-06 for bicycle and pedestrian capital improvement projects. SUBMITTED BY: Director of General Services / City Engineer ék REVIEWED BY: City ManagerGçl: ()\<v ("" (4/S'h vote: Yes _ No ...x.J The Transportation Development Act (TDA) and the TransNet Program provide funding support for regional bicycle and pedestrian capital improvement projects. SANDAO will allocate those project funds to cities in the San Diego region, based upon funding availability and project ranking. Staff has prepared funding applications for six projects. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution and approve submittal of the applications. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS: Not applicable DISCUSSION: The City is eligible to compete for funding on an annual basis for bicycle and pedestrian projects under the following programs: Transportation Development Act (TDA): This fund provides support for the region's non-motorized transportation projects including sidewalk and bicycle lane improvements. The revenue comes from V. % of the total 7 %% sales tax assessed in the region. Each year, SANDAG is responsible for the allocation of TDA funds in conformance with legislative and region-wide priorities. TransNet Program: In 1987, San Diego County voters approved a half-cent tax to finance transportation projects. County voters subsequently approved Proposition A in November 2004 which enacted a 40-year extension of TransNet. The resulting TransNet funding is combined with local, state and federal dollars to improve the region's transportation network. As with the TDA Fund, SANDAG administers this major public works program using Bicycle and Pedestrian Claim Guidelines that reflect both the agency's policy and State law (see Attachment A). City of Chula Vista applications for FY 200S-06 Each year, the City participates in the claim process for TDA and TransNet bicycle and pedestrian project funds by submitting an updated list of projects to SANDAG. The evaluation process for TDA bicycle and pedestrian projects and TransNet bicycle projects is consistent with the way SANDAG evaluates and prioritizes other components of the transportation system such as 4-1 Page 2, Item 4- Meeting Date 04/05/05 arterial, highway, and transit projects. In addition, the selection criteria supports the overall goals and objectives SANDAG has for improving the regional transportation system and promoting smart growth in the region by giving priority to projects that enhance the existing transportation network as a whole. The criteria to be used in the evaluation process are specified in the Project Selection Criteria matrix for each project in Attachment B. For FY 2005-06, the City is requesting funding for the following proposed bicycle and pedestrian improvement projects, which are further detailed in Attachment B: 1. Bav Boulevard Bike Lane between F Street and J Street: The proposed project consists of installing 5280 feet of Class 2 bike lane on Bay Boulevard between F Street and J Street. The total cost of the project is $58,600. The total application request for TDAlTransNet funds is $58,600. 2. Bike Routes along Various Streets: This proposed project is intended to install signage designating Class 3 Bike Routes along various city streets. The total cost of the project is $25,300. The total application request for TDAlTransNet funds is $25,300. 3. East H Street Bike Gap Connector - west of Buena Vista Wav to Otav Lakes Road: This proposed project consists of constructing bike paths and bike lanes along East H Street fiom Buena Vista Way to Otay Lakes Road connecting existing bicycle facilities and completing the bikeway system in this area. The total cost of the project is $1,040,900. The total application request for TDAlTransNet funds is $540,900. The remaining $500,000 matching funds will come fiom Bicycle Transportation Account (BT A) Funds. 4. Pedestrian Master Plan: The Pedestrian Master Plan will identify missing pedestrian improvements, establish priorities and program capital improvement projects that will improve connectivity among existing facilities. The total cost of the project is $150,000. The total application request for TDAlTransNet funds is $150,000. 5. Castle Park Elementarv School Sidewalk Improvements STL-287: This project is included in the City's FY2003-04 CIP. This project will install sidewalk improvements within Y. mile of Castle Park Elementary School. Improvements to missing sidewalks are necessary for adequate pedestrian circulation. The total cost of the project is $736,600. The scope of work for this project includes asphalt concrete pavement, PCC driveways, PCC sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, pavement striping, traffic signs, and other miscellaneous work. The design for this project is currently 90% complete. Under SANDAG's Bicycle and Pedestrian Claim regulations, only the sidewalk and pedestrian ramp improvements are eligible for TDA funding. The total eligible for TDA funding is $176,500. The application request for TDAlTransNet funds is $88,300. The remaining funding for this project is $9,000 in Gas Tax, $86,625 in Safe Routs to Schools Funds, and $552,675 in Block Grant funds. 4-2 Page 3, Item LJ-.- Meeting Date õ47Õ5Iõ5 6. Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements. L Street to Orange Avenue STL-291: This project is included in the City's FY2003-04 CIP. This project will install sidewalk improvements along Fourth Avenue between L Street and Orange Avenue. The proposed improvements are necessary for adequate pedestrian circulation along Fourth Avenue. The total cost of this project is $2,018,700. The scope of work for this project includes asphalt concrete pavement, PCC driveways, PCC sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, right-of- way acquisition, retaining walls, traffic loops, street lights, pavement striping, and other miscellaneous work. The design for this project is currently 20% complete. Construction of this project will have to be coordinated with SDG&E's undergrounding project in the area, and the relocation of drainage facilities associated with the undergrounding project. Construction estimated to start by the middle of 2007. Under SANDAG's Bicycle and Pedestrian Claim regulations, only the sidewalk and pedestrian ramp improvements are eligible for TDA funding. The total eligible for TDA funding is $198,400. The application request for TDA/TransNet funds is $99,200. The remaining funding for this project is $320,000 in Gas Tax, $358,294 in Residential Construction, and $1,241,206 in Block Grant funds. Other sources of funding for the above listed projects are shown in the TDA Annual Grant Application for each project (see Attachment B). These six projects were selected because they closely follow the eligibility guidelines for TDA and TransNet funding. Applications for TDA/TransNet non-motorized claims must be received by SANDAG by April I, 2005. A certified copy of the Council-adopted resolution for the funding applications must be received by SANDAG no later than May 2, 2005. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact to the General Fund. Potential revenue to the City fiom TransNet and TDA is approximately $962,300 for all of the proposed projects. The CIP will be amended to include these projects if approved by SANDAG. Attachment A: SANDAG's "Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines" Attachment B: Grant Applications for Transportation Development Act/TransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects J:\ENGINEERIAGENDA\CAS200S\4-0S-0S\TDA 8< TRANSNET FU~~~G FY06-A113-S0LO.DOC Attachment "An BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CLAIM GUIDELINES Introduction The following describes the claim process for Transportation Development Act (TDA) bicycle and pedestrian projects and TransNet bicycle projects. TDA Project Eligibility The law specifies that the money should be allocated according to the regulations adopted by SANDAG as the regional transportation planning agency. It also identifies certain categories of eligible projects. These specific project types represent neither an exhaustive list. nor are they listed as priorities (Public Utilities Code Sections 99233.3 and 99234). They are summarized below for reference. Project selection criteria, established by SANDAG Board policy, are discussed later. , Construction, including related engineering expenses, of bicycle and pedestrian faciiities. , Maintenance of bicycle trails' provided they are closed to motorized traffic. , Projects serving the needs of commuting bicyclists, including but not limited to, new trails serving major transportation corridors, secure bicycle parking at employment centers, park and ride lots, and transit centers where other funds are not available. , A comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian facilities plan (no more than once every five years), with an emphasis on bicycle projects intended to primarily accommodate non- recreational bicycle trips. '. Up to 20 percent of the cost to restripe Class 11 bicycle lanes. , Up to 5 percent of the amount available to a city or the county may be expended in conjunction with other funds to support bicycle safety education programs, so long as the funds are not used to fully fund the salary of anyone person. TransNet Project Eligibility TransNet bicycle funds may be expended for all purposes necessary and convenient to the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of facilities intended for use by bicyclists. These funds also may be used for programs that help to encourage the use of bicycles, such as secure parking facilities, bicycle promotion programs, and safety programs. Pedestrian projects are not eligible under the TransNet program. Certain costs at times associated with bicycle and pedestrian projects are not eligible when the benefit provided is not the exclusive use of bicyclists or pedestrians. These instances are listed below. 1 of 3 4-4 Attachment "A" Curb and gutter are part of the roadway drainage system. As such, newly-installed curb and gutter cannot be considered an improvement exclusively for the benefit of the sidewalk or bike lane and are not an eligible expense. Driveway ramps installed across sidewalks are not for the benefit of pedestrians, and in fact, degrade the pedestrian environment. Claimants may not include the cost of driveway ramps in applications for sidewalk projects. However, the distance across the driveway may be included when computing the per-square-foot cost of the sidewalk. · Where roadway design standards require a roadway shoulder width at least as wide as would be required for a standard bike lane, the cost of the shoulder construction will not be eligible. Appropriate bikeway signage is eligible. Under some circumstances, it may be necessary to remove and replace curb and gutter, driveway ramps, drainage facilities and other existing improvements in order to construct a bikeway or sidewalk. In such cases the cost of this work is most likely eligible, but claimants should carefully document why this is so in the claim submittal. SANDAG Claim Requirements SANDAG has the authority to establish criteria applicable to analyzing and evaluating claims for non-motorized transportation facilities (Public Utilities Code Section 99401). To be considered for funding, a claim must be consistent with SANDAG's adopted non-motorized plans and meet the requirements for community support and geometric design standards as described in Categories 1 and 2 of the Project Selection Criteria. In addition, the following requirements must be met, if applicable: · If the project abuts other jurisdictions, it must be shown on the adopted plans of the adjacent jurisdictions, or a letter must be submitted from the abutting jurisdiction showing that cooperative efforts are underway. · Other sources of funding for cooperative projects must be identified. Please attach supporting documentation that shows matching funds have been secured. Matching funds that have not been secured will not be considered in the matching funds section of the project scoring matrix. Application Process Applications for TDA and TransNet non-motorized claims must be received by SANDAG by April 1 of each year. To be considered for funding, the Annual Grant Application must be fully completed. In addition, please consider the following, if applicable: · For claims supporting educational or promotional programs and claims for planning projects, include a project budget and work program, including a project schedule. · No later than May 2, 2005, include a certified copy of a resolution or minute order in which the planning group, planning commission, or governing body of the claimant authorizes the claim. 2 of 3 4-5 Attachment "A" Evaluation Process The evaluation process for TDA bicycle and pedestrian projects and TransNet bicycle projects is consistent with the way SANDAG evaluates and prioritizes other components of the transportation system such as arterial, highway, and transit projects. Transportation project priorities are established in planning documents like the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), MOBILITY 2030. Priorities also are used for funding decisions that are programmed in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). In addition, the selection criteria supports the overall goals and objectives SANDAG has for improving the regional transportation system and promoting smart growth in the region by giving priority to projects that enhance the existing transportation network as a whole. The criteria to be used in the evaluation process are specified in the Project Selection Criteria matrix. Claimants for TDA bicycle and pedestrian projects and TransNet bicycle projects will be responsible far accurately filling out the Annual Grant Application and the accompanying Project Selection Criteria matrix. SANDAG will be responsible for performing the GIS Analysis in Category 4 and the Cost Benefit Analysis in Category 10 of the Project Selection Criteria based on the process outlined below. SANDAG will compile the results from the Grant Applications and produce a prioritized list of projects that will be reviewed by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group (BPWG). The committee will then recommend a final priority list of projects to the SANDAG Transportation Committee, which will then be approved by the SANDAG Board of Directors. . The GIS Analysis will be based on the following five factors: total population, total employment, population density, employment density, and number of activity centers. Using the project limits provided by the claimant, SANDAG will perform the GIS Analysis using data for population and employment forecasts far 2010. A buffer will be created around each project area. Pedestrian projects will be given a half-mile buffer and bicycle projects will be given a one-mile buffer. The buffered areas will be used along with the population and employment data to generate population and employment densities. The number of Activity Centers, as identified by SANDAG's data warehouse, will be identified and tallied. Each factor will be scored from 1 to 4 points, for a possible total of 20 points for the GIS Analysis category. Projects will be scored in each category relative to each other by taking the raw scares and distributing them from highest to lowest. The highest twenty- five percent will receive 4 points, the second highest quartile will receive 3 points, the third highest quartile will receive 2 points, and the lowest quartile will receive 1 point. . The Cost Benefit Analysis will be computed by taking the subtotal score from categories 1 through 8 on the Project Selection Criteria matrix and dividing that subtotal by the grant application amount. Projects wili be scored relative to each other by taking the raw scores and distributing them from highest to lowest, with the project with the highest cast benefit ratio receiving 15 points and the project with the lowest cost benefit ratio receiving 1 point. 30f3 4-6 ATTACHMENT "8" Annual Grant Application Transportation Development ActlTransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements Project Limits: South side of Naples Street from Alpine Avenue to Tobias Drive, and east side of Tobias Drive from Ortando Court to Gentry Way. Contact Person: Jeff Moneda Titie: Civil Engineer Address City of Chula Vista General Services Department 1800 Maxwell Road Chula Vista, California 91911 Phone: (619) 397-6102 Fax: (619) 397-6250 E-mail: imonedaCâlci.chula-vista.ca.us Person Authorized to Submit Application: I certify that I have reviewed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines and the information submitted in this application is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines. Samir Nuhailv Name Senior Civil Enqineer Title Signature Date Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements 1 of 5 4-7 ATTACHMENT "8" Proiect Fundino: Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed project estimate based on best available engineering) See Attachment 2 Revenues (Source and Amount): Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Selection Criteria) $736.600 Revenue Source Amount Gas Tax $ 9.000 Safe Routes to Schools $ 86.625 Block Grants $ 552.675 Total $ 648.300 TDAlTransNet (Application Amount as shown in Category 10 of Project Selection Criteria) $ 88 300 Total Revenues $ 736.600 Supportinq Materials A Communitv Support/Consistencv with Communitv Plan (Cateoorv 1) - The councilor governing board of the applicant must authorize this grant application. Please attach a copy of the resolution or minute order documenting that action. Or, if the project is part of an approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a copy of the section that includes the project. City Staff will submit a Resolution on April 5, 2005 to Council approving application. B. Minimum Desion Standards rCateoorv 2) - Typical cross-sections and photographs (if applicable) that indicate project conditions and any significant features that affect feasibility and/or cost. See Attachment 1 C. Proiect Readiness (Cateoorv 3) Phase Beqin Complete Jul-2003 Sep-2004 Aug-2004 Apr-2005 Feasibility Study Preliminary Engineering Environmental Document'Certification Jun-2003 Aug-2004 Aug-2004 Nov-2004 Final Design (90% complete) Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements 2 of 5 4-8 ATTACHMENT "8" Advertise for Construction Begin Construction Project Completion May-2005 Aug-2005 Nov-2005 May-2005 Oct-2005 Dec-2005 D. Geooraphic Factors/GjS Analvsis (Cateoorv 4) - SANDAG will perform a GIS analysis as described in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines based upon a project map provided by the applicant. Briefiy describe project limits and provide a location map clearly showing the project alignment. In addition, clearly show and label the following elements: a. major traffic generators within the project area (within %-miie for pedestrian projects and within 1-mile for bicycle projects) b. linkage or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities c. linkage to any regional bikeway or public transit stop The proposed project will provide access to a number of destinations throughout the community. E. Geooraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateoorv 4) - List and briefiy describe major traffic generators served by the project. The proposed sidewalks are located within half-mile buffer of: Castle Park Elementary School Castle Park Middle School Castle Park High School First Presbyterian Church of Chula Vista The Whole World Church St. Pious X Catholic Church Tabernacle of Chula Vista Spanish Faith Center Castle Park Assembly of God Church Numerous Transit Bus Stops F. Completes Connection/Linkaoe in Existino Bicvcle/Pedestrian Network (Cateoorv 5) - List and briefly describe the linkages or connections to existing facilities. The proposed project will provide access to a number of destinations throughout the community. The proposed improvements will be located within half a mile of Chula Vista Transit Routes 701,702,704,712, G. Safetv Improvements (Cateoorv 6) - Describe the safety issues addressed by the project. If applicable, please attach support documentation for safety and accident·history The proposed project will provide safer routes between destinations to schools, churches, . shopping areas, and parks. H. Innovation and Desion (Cateoorv 7) - Describe any design innovations for bicycle/pedestrian priority measures that are included within the project limits.: Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements 30f5 4-9 ATTACHMENT "8" I. Connect to Reoional Transportation Corridor or Transit Linkaqe or Reqional Bikewav Map (Cateoory ID - Please list the project's linkages to any regional bikeway (for bicycle projects) or public transit. Is this project in your agency's adopted capital improvement program (Y/N) y. This project was included in the City's FY2003-04 Capital Improvement Program. Design for this project is 90% complete If the project is part.of a larger capital improvement project, briefiy discuss how the bicycle or pedestrian project costs were identified and a description of the other sources of funds for the overall project. The City's TDA Application is for only 50% of those items related to pedestrian facilities (e.g., sidewalks, pedestrian ramps.) See Attachment 2. Other sources of funding are Gas Tax, Safe Routes to Schools, and Community Development Block Grants. Briefiy describe any other aspects of the project that is relevant to its evaluation. Bicvcle Master Plans. Pedestrian Master Plans, Education/Safetv Proqrams and Bicvcle Parkinq Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking projects will each be considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Basic Guidelines Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with population up to 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $75,000. Cities with population greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000. Beginning with the 2007 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG-approved Bicycle Plan to be eligible for TDA/TransNet funds for individual projects. Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements 40f5 4-10 ATTACHMENT uBu · Pedestrian Master Plans - An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no more frequently than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a population over 150,000 may submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may submit applications up to $100,000. In either case, the amount of the application must be substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG. · EducationlSafety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule to be evaluated by SANDAG staff. · Bicycle Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a projected cost up to $50,000 will be eligibie. Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements 5 of 5 4-11 ATTACHMENT "B" Pedestrian Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 1. Community Support! Must have at least one of the following to Pass/Fail Consistency with qualify. Please attach supporting Community Plan documentation. Pass 1. Resolution or minutes from City Council, County Board of Supervisors, local planning group, or Pianning Commission. Or 2. Project is part of a Non-Motorized Plan that has been approved within the last five years. 2. Minimum Design Standards Must meet the minimum geometric standards Pass/Fail Pass set forth In the SANDAG Plan nino and Desiqninq for Pedestrians manual and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Design exceptions may be presented for consideration by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group with the understanding that initiai project proposals must include a design that meets minimum standards. 3. Project Readiness' Projects are eligible for points foliowing completion of each phase. Feasibility Study 4 4 Preliminarv Enqineerinq .. 4 4 Environmental Clearance 4 4 Riqht-of-way Acquisition 4 4 20 Points Maximum Final Design .. 4 0 4. Geographic Factors/ Factors contributing to score are: proximity to o to 20 GIS Analysis - population and employment, population and 20 Points Maximum employment densities, and activity centers. 5. Completes Connection/ Completes or improves connection in existing 10 Linkage in Existing network 10 Pedestrian Network - 10 Points Maximum 6. Safety Improvements - Imoroves safety within existinq network. 12 12 20 Points Maximum Completes connection in existing network at location with documented safety or accident history A. One to two correctable crashes 4 involving non-motorized users within the last three years. B. Three to four correctable crashes 6 involving non-motorized users within the last three years. C. Five to six correctable crashes 8 involving nOIÌ-motorized users within the last three years. Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements Page 1 of 2 4-12 ATTACHMENT "B" Pedestrian Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 7. Innovation and Design - Pedestrian priority measures such as 10 Points Maximum pedestrian-controlled signals, bulb-outs, raised crosswalks, signal lead time, etc. A. Animated eye indicators, countdown 4 pedestrian signal, accessible push- button signal, fiashing crosswalk B. Early pedestrian release interval, 6 passive pedestrian detection, audible pedestrian signal C. Raised crosswalk, speed table, raised 8 intersection, pedestrian refuge island D. Pedestrian bulb-out, cul-de-sac 10 connector 8. Connect to Regional Project is a part of, or connects to, a regional 10 Transportation Corridor! corridor as identified in the Regional Transit Linkage - Transportation Plan (RTP) . 20 Points Maximum Project provides a direct connection to local 14 transit stoo. 14 Project provides a direct connection to 20 reç¡ional transit station. Subtotal 14 9. Matching Funds Matching funds can be from any of the (Matching 25 Points Maximum following sources: Funds! 22 1. Identified and approved capital Project funding from identified source. Cost) x 25 Please provide proof in the form of a resolution or letter of approval. 2. Approved match grant 3. In-kind services. Please provide adeouate SUODOrt documentation. 10. Cost Benefit Subtotal Score! Grant Application Amount o to 15 15 Points Maximum Total Score 0 * Previous project milestones must be met before qualifying for subsequent funding. ** Preliminary Engineering and Final Designs will be subject to design review by SANDAG. Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements Page 2 of 2 4-13 en +"" c: 0,) E 0,) > o L- a. E - ~ - eo 3 0,) -c .- en ~ L- eo c- O,) - +"" en eo () ~ ~!JJ¡ ~;> ~It 6~ ATTACHMENT "8" en f- Z OLU LU::::iE enLU 0> a.~ 0a. e:::::::iE a._ rJ) LU f- :::J ~ rJ) :::J tQ en a. o f- rJ) rJ) :::J tQ rJ) LU :I: Ü e::: :::J :I: Ü en ...J o o :I: Ü rJ) ~ e::: « a. I Ii . ic w +ð z ~ ATTACHMENT "8" City of Chula Vista GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT \ DESIGN COST ESTIMATE Project Number: DATE: PREPARED BY: CHECKED BY: STL-287 March 18, 2005 Cesar Magbuhat J. Moneda Project Title: Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Amount Price 1 Asphalt Concrete Pavement and Seal Coat 865 Tons $115.00 $99,475.00 2 Crushed A9gregate Base 956 Tons $65.00 $62,140.00 3 P.c.c. Curb & Gutter (6") 984 LF $20.00 $19,680.00 4 P.C.C. Slab, 4" * 6202 SF $8.50 $52,717.00 5 P,C.C. Monolithic Sidewalk (not including curb gutter) 1150 SF $7.00 $8,050.00 6 Curb & gutter for above ~em 230 LF $15.00 $3,450.00 7 P .C.C. Slab, 6"(Driveway) 5506 SF $14.00 $77,084.00 B P.C.c. Slab, 6" (Cross Gutter) 1412 SF $14.00 $19,768.00 9 Pedestrian Ramo per CVCS-19 Type E Mod.* 2 Ea. $5,000.00 $10,000.00 10 Pedestrian Ramp per CVCS-25 Type A Mod. * 7 Ea. $5,000.00 $35,000.00 11 Pedestrian Ramp per CVCS-28 Type D Mod. * 1 Ea. $4,500.00 $4,500.00 12 Relocation of Traffic Signs (Street Name, stop, Speed Sign) 7 Ea. $500.00 $3,500.00 13 Underdrain Pipe, 3-inch PVC 50 LF $25.00 $1,250.00 14 Removal of Existing Tree 1 Ea. $900.00 $900.00 ur",Sn ana ,"scali ~{ree{ u9m ~<anaaro, iF wlm O' Mas¡; 15 Arm compiete with foundations, 150 Watts HPSV and Photo 1 Ea. $4,000.00 $4,000.00 16 #3 1/2 Pull Box with Street Ught Lid 2 Ea. $250.00 $500.00 17 Trench, Furnish and Install Conduit w~h Pull Rope 200 LF $14.00 $2,800.00 environmental olOIOglcal survey Lonsuitant Services per 18 Section 2-26 of the Special Provisions Part 2 Technical 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 19 Pavement Striping, Marking and Slgnage 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 20 Traffic Control 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00 21 Sweetwater Authoritv Water Relocation 1 LS $10,500.00 $10,500.00 21 Soil Testing 1 LS $11,000.00 $11,000.00 * Total of eilgible items for IDA funding (no contingencies, no staff time costs). See Estimate Page 2 for complete breakdown $110,267.00 Subtotal: $ 460,314.00 Contingencies 15.0 %1 $460,314.00 $ 69047.10 Subtotal: $ 529361.10 Construction Inspection (staff costs) 10.0 %1 $460,314.00 $ 46,031.40 Desig n (staff costs) 15.0 %1 $460,314.00 $ 69,047.10 Survey Work (staff costs) 20.0 %1 $460,314.00 $ 92,062.80 $ - TOTAL: $ 736,502.40 Notes: 4-15 ATTACHMENT "8" COST ESTIMATE PAGE 2 City of Chula Vista GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT \ DESIGN COST ESTIMATE Project Title: Castle Park SIdewalk Improvements TDA Eligible Items Only Project Number: DATE: . PREPARED BY: CHECKED BY: STL-287 March 18, 2005 Cesar Magbuhat J. Moneda No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Amount Price 1 P.C.c. Slab, 4" , 6202 SF $8.50 $52,717.00 2 P.C.c. Monolithic Sidewalk (not including curb gutter)' 1150 SF $7.00 $8,050.00 3 Pedestrian Ramp per CVC5-19 Type E Mod.' 2 Ea. $5,000.00 $10,000.00 4 Pedestrian Ramp per CVCS-25 Type A Mod.' 7 Ea. $5,000.00 $35,000.00 5 Pedestrian Ramp per CVCS-28 Type D Mod.' 1 Ea. $4,500.00 $4,500.00 The TDA Aplication is for 50% of TDA eligible items: $88,213.60 . Subtotai: $ 110,267.00 Contingencies 1 15.01 % $110,267.00 $ 16,540.05 Subtotal: $ 126,807.05 Construction Inspection (staff costs) 1 10.01 % $110,267.00 $ 11,026.70 Design (staff costs) 15.01 % $110,267.00 $ 16,540.05 Survey Work (staff costs) 20.01 % $110,267.00 $ 22,053.40 $ - TOTAL: $ 176,427.20 Notes: 4-16 ATTACHMENT "B" South side of Naples Street at First A venue looking west. South side ofNapl~ Street looking west. Project Title: Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements 4-17 ATTACHMENT "8" South side of Naples Street at Alpine Avenue looking east. South side of N apl~s Street looking west. Project Title: Castle Park Sidewalk Improvements 4-18 ATTACHMENT "8" Annual Grant Application Transportation Development ActlTransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Project Limits: From L Street to Orange Avenue Contact Person: Jeff Moneda Title: Civil Engineer Address City of Chula Vista General Services Department 1800 Maxwell Road Chula Vista, California 91911 Phone: (619) 397-6102 Fax: (619) 397-6250 E-mail: imoneda(ã)ci.chula-vista.ca.us Person Authorized to Submit Application: I certify that I have reviewed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines and the information submitted in this application is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines. Samir Nuhailv Name Senior Civil Enoineer Title Signature Date Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements 1 of 5 4-19 ATTACHMENT "8" Project FundinQ: Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed project estimate based on best available engineering) See Attachment 2 Revenues (Source and Amount): Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Selection Criteria) $2.018.700 Revenue Source Amount Gas Tax $ 320.000 Residential Construction $ 358,294 Block Grants $ 1.241206 Total $ 1.919.500 TDAlTransNet (Application Amount as shown in Category 10 of Project Selection Criteria) $ 99.200 Total Revenues $ 2.018,700 SupportinQ Materials A Communitv Support/Consistency with Communitv Plan (Cateqorv 1) - The councilor governing board of the applicant must authorize this grant application, Please attach a copy of the resolution or minute order documenting that action, Or, if the project is part of an approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a copy of the section that includes the project. City Staff will submit a Resolution on April 5, 2005 to Council approving application. B, Minimum Desiqn Standards (Cateqorv 2) - Typical cross-sections and photographs (if applicable) that indicate project conditions and any significant features that affect feasibility and/or cost. See Attachment 1 C. Proiect Readiness (Cateqorv 3) Phase Beqin Complete Feasibility Study Dec-2004 Dec-2004 Preliminary Engineering Feb-2005 Feb-2005 Environmental Document/Certification Mar-2005 Apr-2005 Final Design Mar-2005 Jun-2005 Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements 2 of 5 4-20 ATTACHMENT "8" Advertise for Construction Jan-2007 Feb-2007 Begin Construction MaY-2'007 Aug-2007 Project Completion Sep-2007 Oct-2007 Construction of this project will have to be coordinated with SDG&E's undergrounding project in the area, and the relocation of drainage facilities associated with the undergrounding project. Construction estimated to start by the middle of 2007. D. GeoGraohic Factors/GIS Analvsis (CateGorv 4) - SANDAG will perform a GIS analysis as described in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines based upon a project map provided by the applicant. Briefly describe project limits and provide a location map clearly showing the project alignment. In addition, clearly show and label the following elements: a. major traffic generators within the project area (within Yo-mile for pedestrian projects and within 1-mile for bicycle projects) b. linkage or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities c. linkage to any regional bikeway or public transit stop The proposed project will provide access to a number of destinations throughout the community. E. GeoGraohic Factors/GIS Analvsis (CateGorv 4) - List and briefiy describe major traffic generators served by the project. The proposed sidewalks are located within half mile of: Chula Vista High School Rice Elementary School SAILS Academy Chula Vista Learning Community Charter Elementary School Del Rey Vocational School Lauderbach Elementary School Palomar High School Montgomery Elementary School Castle Park Middle School Otay Apostolic Church Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of LDS The County Church of the Full Gospel Church of the Most Precious Blood First Christian Reformed Church of Chula Vista The Whole World Church South Bay Baptist Church Church of Christ Chula Vista Church of the Nazarene Masonic Temple Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements 3 of 5 4-21 ATTACHMENT "8" F. Completes Connection/Linkaae in Existina Bicvcle/Pedestrian Network (Cateaorv 5) - List and briefly describe the linkages or connections to existing facilities. The proposed project will provide access to a number of destinations throughout the community. The proposed improvements will be located within half a mile of Chula Vista Transit Routes 701,702,703,704,706, 706A, 712, and San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Routes 929, and 932. G. Safety Improvements (Cateaorv 6) - Describe the safety issues addressed by the project. If applicable, please attach support documentation for safety and accident history The proposed project will provide safer routes between destinations to schools, churches, shopping areas, and parks. H. Innovation and Desian (Cateaorv 7) - Describe any design innovations for bicycle/pedestrian priority measures that are included within the project limits. L Connect to Reaional Transportation Corridor or Transit Linkaae or Reaional Bikewav Map (Cateaorv ill - Please list the project's linkages to any regional bikeway (for bicycle projects) or public transit. Is this project in your agency's adopted capital improvement program (Y/N) Y This project was included in the City's FY2003-04 Capital Improvement Program. Preliminary Engineering for this is complete. Design will be completed in 2005. Construction of this project will have to be coordinated with SDG&E's undergrounding project in the area, and the relocation of drainage facilities associated with the undergrounding project. Construction estimated to start by the middle of 2007. If the project is part of a larger capital improvement project, briefly discuss how the bicycle or pedestrian project costs were identified and a description of the other sources of funds for the overall project. The City's TDA Application is for only 50% of those items related to pedestrian facilities (e.g., sidewalks, pedestrian ramps.) See Attachment 2. Other sources of funding are Gas Tax, Safe Routes to Schools, and Community Development Block Grants Briefly describe any other aspects of the project that is relevant to Its evaluation. Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements 40f5 4-22 ATTACHMENT "8" Bicvcle Master Plans, Pedestrian Master Plans, Education/Safetv ProQrams and Bicvcle ParkinQ Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking projects will each be considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Basic Guidelines Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with population up to 75,000 will be eligibie for a maximum of $75,000. Cities with popuiation greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000. Beginning with the 2007 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG-approved Bicycle Pian to be eligible for TDAfTransNet funds for individual projects. · Pedestrian Master Plans - An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no more frequentiy than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a population over 150,000 may submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may submit applications up to $100,000. In either case, the amount of the application must be substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG. · Education/Safety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule to be evaluated by SANDAG staff. · Bicycle Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a projected cost up to $50,000 will be eligible. Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements 5 of 5 4-23 ATTACHMENT "B" Pedestrian Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 1. Community SupportJ Must have at least one of the following to Pass/Fail Pass Consistency with qualify. Please attach supporting Community Plan documentation. 1. Resolution or minutes from City Council, County Board of Supervisors, iocai planning group, or Planning Commission. Or 2. Project is part of a Non-Motorized Plan that has been approved within the last five years. 2. Minimum Design Standards Must meet the minimum geometric standards Pass/Fail Pass set forth in the SANDAG Planninq and Desiqninq for Pedestrians manual and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Design exceptions may be presented for consideration by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group with the understanding that initial project proposals must include a design that meets minimum standards. 3. Project Readiness' Projects are eligible for points following comoletion of each ohase. Feasibility Study 4 4 Preliminarv Enoineerino .. 4 4 Environmental Clearance 4 0 Rioht-of-wav Acouisition 4 0 20 Points Maximum Final Design .. 4 0 4. Geographic Factors/ Factors contributing to score are: proximity to o to 20 GIS Analysis - papulation and employment, population and 20 Points Maximum employment densities, and activity centers. 5. Completes Connection/ Compietes or improves connection in existing 10 Linkage in Existing network 10 Pedestrian Network - 10 Points Maximum 6. Safety Improvements - Imnroves safetv within existino network. 12 12 20 Points Maximum Completes connection in existing network at location with documented safety or accident history A. One to two correctable crashes 4 involving non-motorized users within the last three vears. B. Three to four correctable crashes 6 involving non-motorized users within the last three vears. C. Five to six cÇJrrectable crashes 8 involving noli-motorized users within the last three vears. Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Paðe-~6\ 2 ATTACHMENT "8" Pedestrian Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 7. Innovation and Design - Pedestrian priority measures such as 10 Points Maximum pedestrian-controlled signals, bulb-outs, raised crosswalks, signal lead time, etc. A. Animated eye indicators, countdown 4 pedestrian signal, accessible push- button signal, flashing crosswalk B. Early pedestrian release interval, 6 passive pedestrian detection, audible pedestrian signal C. Raised crosswalk, speed table, raised 8 intersection, pedestrian refuge isiand D. Pedestrian bulb-out, cul-de-sac 10 connector 8. Connect to Regional Project is a part of, or connects to, a regional 10 Transportation Corridor! corridor as identified in the Regional Transit Linkage - Transportation Plan (RTP) . 10 20 Points Maximum Project provides a direct connection to local 14 transit stoo. 14 Project provides a direct connection to 20 reQional transit station. Subtotal 14 g. Matching Funds Matching funds can be from any of the (Matching 25 Points Maximum following sources: Funds! 24 1. Identified and approved capital Project funding from identified source. Cost) x 25 Please provide proof in the form of a resolution or letter of approval. 2. Approved match grant. 3. In-kind services. Please provide adeouate suooort documentation. 10. Cost Benefit Subtotal Score! Grant Application Amount o to 15 15 Points Maximum Total Score 0 . Previous project milestones must be met before quaiifying for subsequent funding. .. Preliminary Engineering and Final Designs will be subject to design review by SANDAG. Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements 4-?5 Page 2 of 2 en +-' C Q) E Q) > o s..... a. E - .:::tt. - CO S Q) '"C -- en Q) ::J C Q) ~ ..c t:: ::J o LL ~ ~fJI ~> =?¡¡J: š~ U'J I- U'J Z OW U'J W U'J I- w::2: U'J W a.. ::J U'JW ...J I U'J 0 0 0> 0 Ü I- a.. 0 0 ~ ~ C/) ~ O~ I ::J ~ U'J U'J ~a.. Ü I ë: ::J ::J a..::2: U'J Ü m m I 00 00 . 00 . 00 ';)0 '--:~ ~IL .' > ,~ Itþ\ 1~~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ? -\ ~ ~ ~ ~ \~ \:- ... ~ '-l '" -"" .. ~ . ¡¡¡¡ yü\ \\000 . r:: ~~ D;r~ ~~& ~. ;;-- E:\ ,'~ - ATTACHMENT "B" +~ z ~ ~= .. Ii \ W\I ~\P ¡-- ~ ~~ ,\ E OiT ,...., r-; nJ.JnI \ :8 r::: --1 I EIHI3 ~ 11M I 'L -¡ - - - -:::' ___j\ A \~ ~\ :J.~ ,r=' \~ ~~,~ 'Q ¡;\I\WIc»: '¡, J:' B'd i,~~~ I.. a-J ""~ ¿ J.il- (hI ,jC ~ ~ ~ ~. ,~\ \Ii >.P:~\ m\~' ~~ \( C\ \\~ ?,A'r"-\ \\ j -:a:.-c ~ ~ ~ I~ \ ~v (\ \~~ ,\; ~'~O(.~~lri 1~~\.1).'~\ '\ \ ~_ ,~_ _.ø____- .---- -- .----..---.- II ED 6! . Q) ::::J c: Q) ~ Q) C) c: co I- o o ...... ...... Q) Q) I- ...... en -l E o l- LL ATTACHMENT "8" Project Title: Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements from "L" Street to Orange Avenue City of Chula Vista GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT \ DESIGN COST ESTIMATE Project Number: DATE: PREPARED BY: CHECKED BY: STL-291 March 18, 2005 Luis Labrada Roberto Yano No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Amount Price 15ft monolithic C/G I!r. S/W* 14000 SF $7.00 $98,000.00 2 Curb & Dutter for above 2800 LF $25.00 $70,000.00 3 6" D.C.C. d/w 6000 SF $10.00 $60,000.00 Asphalt conncrete pavement and seal coat (max. 4" 4 thick) 1000 TON $110.00 $110,000.00 5 Pedestrian ramDs* 12 EA $2.500.00 $30,000.00 6 r/w acouisition 1500 SF $25.00 $37,500.00 7 Private improvement relocation costs 1 L5 $60,000.00 $60 000.00 8 Masonrv retainina-wall 3'-4' 2100 SF $40.00 $84.000.00 9 Relocate traffic sional facilities 1 L5 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 10 Crush a(](]regate base 870 TON $50.00 $43,500.00 11 Striping and raise markers 20000 LF $1.00 $20,000.00 12 Removal and disoosal of existino Improvements 1 L5 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 13 Road construction sians 5 EA $750.00 $3,750.00 14 Remove and reoiace mailbox 31 EA $250.00 $7,750.00 15 Remove and reDlace curb inlet tvDe "K" 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 16 36" HDPE nine (relocation of 30" CSP Dioe) 275 LF $250.00 $68,750.00 17 24" hdDe Dioe (relocation of 24" CSP pipe) 650 LF $200.00 $130,000.00 18 Sand slurrv seal 125 CYD $80.00 $10,000.00 19 Clean-outs 3 EA $5,000.00 $15,000.00 20 Survev 1 L5 $120,000.00 . $120,000.00 21 F&I street light 31 EA $2,500.00 $77,500.00 22 F&I #3 Dull box 33 EA $200.00 $6,600.00 23 Trench, f&I conduit 10000 LF $13.00 $130,000.00 24 Traffic control 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2S r/w acquisition staff cast 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00 * Total of eligible items for IDA funding (no contIngencies, no staff time costs). ,... See Estimate Page 2 for complete breakdown $128,000.00 % Subtotal: $ 1 302 350.00 I Contingencies I 20.0 $ 1,302,350.00 $ 260,470.00 % ¡Subtotal: $ 1,562.820.00 I Staff Costs (Construction inspection)1 15.0 $ 1,302,350.00 $ 195,352.50 % Subtotal: $ 1,758,172.50 I Staff Costs (Design, Planning I!r. Envir.)T 20.0 $ 1,302,350.00 $ 260,470.00 TOTAL: $ 2,018,642.50 I Notes: 4-27 ATTACHMENT "B" COST ESTIMATE PAGE 2 City of Chula Vista GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT \ DESIGN COST ESTIMATE Project Title: Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements from "L" Street to Orange Avenue TDA Eligible Items Only Project Number: DATE: PREPARED BY: CHECKED BY: STL-291 March 18, 2005 Luis Labrada Roberto Yano No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Amount Price 15ft monolithic C/G & S/W 14000 SF $7.00 $98,000.00 2 Pedestrian ramps 12 EA $2,500.00 $30,000.00 The TDA Aplication is for 50% of TDA eliaibie items: $ 99,200.00 - % Subtotal: $ 128,000.00 Contingencies I 20.01 $ 128,000.00 $ -~ - 25,600.00 % Subtotal: $ 153.6öõ.õõ1 Staff Costs (Construction inspection) 15.01 $ 128,000.00 $ . 19,200.00 ",,:;:..¡~""""''''-'W'''''___~'''"~ % Subtotal: $ $ 128,000.00 $ TOTAL: $ 172,800.00 ¡ 25,600.00 198,400.00 Staff Costs (Design, Planning & Envir.)I 20.0 Notes: 4-28 ATTACHMENT uB" Fourth Avenue at Palomar Street Looking South Fourth Avenue North of PalOI~ar Street Looking North Project Title: Fourth Avenue Sidewalk Improvements 4-29 ATTACHMENT "8" Annual Grant Application Transportation Development ActfTransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: Pedestrian Master Plan Project Limits: Contact Person: Roberto Solórzano Title: Assistant Engineer Address City of Chula Vista Engineering Division 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Phone: (619) 409-5420 Fax: (619) 691-5171 E-mail: solo@cLchula-vista.ca.us Person Authorized to Submit Application: I certify that I have reviewed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines and the information submitted in this application is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines. Samir Nuhailv Name Senior Civil Enqineer Title Signature Date Pedestrian Master Plan 10f4 4-30 ATTACHMENT "8" Proiect Fundinq: Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed project estimate based on best available engineering) $150000 Revenues (Source and Amount): Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Selection Criteria) Revenue Source Amount $ $ Total $ TDAlTransNet (Application Amount as shown in Category 10 of Project Selection Criteria) $ 150.000 Total Revenues $ 150,000 Supportinq Materials A Communitv Support/Consistencv with Community Plan (Cateqorv 1) - The councilor governing board of the applicant must authorize this grant application. Please attach a copy of the resolution or minute order documenting that action. Or, if the project is part of an approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a copy of the section that includes the project. City Staff will submit a Resolution on April 5, 2005 to Council approving application. B. Minimum Desiqn Standards (Cateqorv 2) - Typical cross-sections and photographs (if applicable) that indicate project conditions and any significant features that affect feasibility and/or cost. C. Proiect Readiness (Cateqorv 3) Phase Beqin Complete Feasibility Study Jul-2005 Jul-2005 Preliminary Engineering Aug-2005 Sep-2005 Advertise for RFP's Sep-2005 Nov-2005 Begin Work Jan-2006 Aug-2006 Project Completion Sep-2006 Nov-2006 D. Geoqraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateqorv 4) - SANDAG wili perform a GIS analysis as described in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines based upon a project map provided by the applicant. Pedestrian Master Plan 20f4 4-31 ATTACHMENT "S" Briefiy describe project limits and provide a location map cleariy showing the project alignment. In addition, clearly show and label the following elements: a. major traffic generators within the project area (within Y:z-mlle for pedestrian projects and within 1-mile for bicycle projects) b. linkage or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities c. linkage to any regional bikeway or public transit stop E. Geooraahic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateoorv 4) - List and briefiy describe major traffic generators served by the project. F. Comaletes Connection/Llnkaoe in Existino Bicvcle/Pedestrian Network ICateoorv 5) - List and briefiy describe the linkages or connections to existing facilities. G. SafelY Imarovements (Cateoorv 6) - Describe the safety issues addressed by the project. If applicable, please attach support documentation for safety and accident history The Pedestrian Master Plan (PMP) will assist city staff quantify missing pedestrian improvements and program capital improvement projects that will improve connectivity within facilities. The PMP will promote a safer and enjoyable pedestrian facilities, since it will assist city staff detect problematic or unsafe areas for missing infrastructure. The PMP will address pedestrian improvements wlihin the entire City, this will encourage completion of missing pedestrian improvements through the city that will improve linkage to regional bikeway and public transit. H. Innovation and Desion ICateoorv 7) - Describe any design innovations for bicycle/pedestrian priority measures that are included within the project limits. I. Connect to Reoional Transaortation Corridor or Transit Llnkaoe or Reoional Bikewav Maa (Cateoorv ID - Please list the project's linkages to any regional bikeway (for bicycle projects) or public transit. Is this project in your agency's adopted capital improvement program (Y/N) If the project is part of a larger capital improvement project, briefly discuss how the bicycle or pedestrian project costs were identified and a description of the other sources of funds for the overall project. This project will be funded with TDA/TransNet Funds. Briefly describe any other aspects of the project that is relevant to its evaluation. Pedestrian Master Plan 30f4 4-32 ATTACHMENT "8" Bicycle Master Plans. Pedestrian Master Plans. Education/Safety Proqrams and Bicycle Parkinq Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking projects will each be considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Basic Guidelines Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with popuiation up to 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $75,000. Cities with population greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000. Beginning with the 2007 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG-approyed Bicycle Plan to be eligible for TDNTransNet funds for individual projects. · Pedestrian Master Plans - An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no more frequently than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a population over 150,000 may submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may submit applications up to $100,000. In either case, the amount of the application must be substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG. · Education/Safety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule to be evaluated by SANDAG staff. · Bicycie Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a projected cost up to $50,000 will be eligible. Pedestrian Master Plan 40f4 4-33 ATTACHMENT "8" Pedestrian Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 1. Community SupporV Must have at least one of the following to Pass/Fail Consistency with qualify. Please attach supporting Community Plan documentation. Pass 1. Resolution or minutes from City Council, County Board of Supervisors, local pianning group, or Planning Commission. Or 2. Project is part of a Non-Motorized Plan that has been approved within the last five years. 2. Minimum Design Standards Must meet the minimum geometric standards Pass/Fail Pass set forth in the SANDAG Planninq and Desiqninq for Pedestrians manual and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Design exceptions may be presented for consideration by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group with the understanding that initial project proposals must include a design that meets minimum standards. 3. Project Readiness· Projects are eligible for points following completion of each phase. Feasibility Study 4 4 Preliminarv Enqineerinq .. 4 4 Environmental Clearance 4 4 Riqht-of-way Acquisition 4 4 20 Points Maximum Final Design .. 4 4 4. Geographic Factors/ Factors contributing to score are: proximity to o to 20 GIS Analysis - population and employment, population and 20 Points Maximum employment densities, and activity centers. 5. Completes Connection/ Completes or improves connection in existing 10 Linkage in Existing network 10 Pedestrian Network - 10 Points Maximum 6. Safety Improvements - Improves safety within existinq network. 12 12 20 Points Maximum Completes connection in existing network at location with documented safety or accident history A. One to two correctable crashes 4 involving non-motorized users within the last three years. B. Three to four correctable crashes 6 involving non-motorized users within the last three years. C. Five to six Gorrectable crashes 8 involving non-motorized users within the last three years. Pedestrian Master Plan P<4¡e 3 4Jf 2 ATTACHMENT "8" Pedestrian Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 7. I nnovation and Design - Pedestrian priority measures such as 10 Points Maximum pedestrian-controlled signals, bulb-outs, raised crosswalks, signal lead time, etc. A. Animated eye indicators, countdown 4 pedestrian signal, accessible push- button signal, flashing crosswalk B. Early pedestrian release interval, 6 passive pedestrian detection, audible pedestrian signal C. Raised crosswaik, speed table, raised 8 intersection, pedestrian refuge island D. Pedestrian buib-out, cul-de-sac 10 connector 8. Connect to Regional Project is a part of, or connects to, a regional 10 Transportation Corridorl corridor as identified in the Regional Transit Linkage - Transportation Plan (RTP) . 20 Points Maximum Project provides a direct connection to local 14 transit stoc. Project provides a direct connection to 20 regional transit station. S u btota I 0 9. Matching Funds Matching funds can be from any of the (Matching 25 Points Maximum following sources: Funds I 0 1. Identified and approved capitai Project funding from identified source. Cost) x 25 Please provide proof in the form of a resolution or letter of approval. 2. Approved match grant. 3. in-kind services. Please provide adeouate succor! documentation. 10. Cost Benefit Subtotal Score I Grant Application Amount o to 15 15 Points Maximum Total Score . Previous project milestones must be met before qualifying for subsequent funding. .. Preliminary Engineering and Final Designs will be subject to design review by SANDAG. Pedestrian Master Plan P<4¡e3S>f 2 ATTACHMENT "8' Annual Grant Application Transportation Development ActlTransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: Bike Routes along Various Streets Project Limits: Main Street from Industrial Boulevard to 1-805 Industrial Boulevard from L Street to Main Street Orange Avenue from Palomar Street to Hilltop Drive East J Street from Paseo Ranchero to Camino Calabazo Contact Person: Roberto Solórzano Title: Assistant Engineer Address City of Chula Vista Engineering Division 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Phone: (619) 409-5420 Fax: (619) 691-5171 E-mail: solo(cj)ci.chula-vista.ca.us Person Authorized to Submit Application: I certify that I have reviewed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines and the information submitted in this application is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines. Samir Nuhailv Name Senior Civil Enoineer Title Signature Date Project: Bike Routes Various Streets 10f5 4-36 ATTACHMENT "8' Project Fundinq: Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed project estimate based on best available engineering) See Attachment 2 Revenues (Source and Amount): Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Selection Criteria) $25.300 Revenue Source Amount Total TDAlTransNet (Application Amount as shown in Category 10 of Project Selection Criteria) $25.300 Total Revenues $25.300 Supportinq Materials A Community Support/Consistencv with Communitv Plan (Cateqorv 1) - The councilor governing board of the applicant must authorize this grant application. Please attach a copy of the resolution or minute order documenting that action. Or, if the project is part of an approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a copy of the section that includes the project City Staff will submit a Resolution on April 5, 2005 to Council approving application. B. Minimum Desion Standards (Cateqorv 2) - Typical cross-sections and photographs (if applicable) that indicate project conditions and any significant features that affect feasibility and/or cost See Attachment 1 C. Proiect Readiness (Cateqorv 3) Phase Beqin Complete Feasibility Study Oct-2005 Nov-2005 Preliminary Engineering Nov-2005 Nov-2005 Environmental Document/Certification N/A N/A Final Design Dec-2005 Dec-2005 Advertise for Construction Jan-2006 Jan-2006 Project: Bike Routes Various Streets 2 of 5 4-37 ATTACHMENT "8' Begin Construction Project Completion Feb-2006 Mar-2006 Feb-2006 Mar-2006 D. Geoaraohic Factors/GIS Analvsis ICateaorv 4) - SANDAG will perform a GIS analysis as described in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines based upon a project map provided by the applicant Briefly describe project limits and provide a location map clearly showing the project alignment In addition, clearly show and label the following elements: a. major traffic generators within the project area (within Yo-mile for pedestrian projects and within 1-mile for bicycle projects) b. linkage or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities c. linkage to any regional bikeway or public transit stop The proposed project will provide access to a number of destinations throughout the community. It will designate preferred routes between destinations such as residential and shopping areas. E. Geoaraohic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateaarv 4) - List and briefly describe major traffic generators served by the project The proposed bike routes are located within one mile of: Harborside Elementary School Palomar High School Lauderbach Elementary School Montgomery Elementary School Montgomery High School Otay Elementary School Castle Park Middle School Castle Park High School Lorna Verde Elementary School Finney Elementary School Rohr Elementary School Valle Lindo Elementary School Mueller Elementary School Chula Vista Learning Community Charter Elementary Chula Vista High School Rice Elementary School Del Rey Vocational Hedenkamp Elementary School Heritage Elementary School Rancho Del Rey Middle School Casillas Elementary School Discovery Elementary Chula Vista Hills Elementary Southwestern College Bonita Vista High School Transit Routes Palm City Trolley Station H Street Trolley Station Palomar Street Trolley Station South Bay Church of Christ Project: Bike Routes Various Streets 30f5 4-38 ATTACHMENT "8' South Bay Community Chapel South Bay Baptist Church Church of Christ The Country Church of the Full Gospel Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ Church of the Most Precious Blood Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church Otay Apostolic Church Otay Baptist Church Baptist Church Church of God in Christ Star of Bethlehem Missionary Baptist Church World Harvest Church Praise Chapel Calvary Chapel Tabernacle of Chula Vista Spanish Faith Center Castle Park Assembly of God Church First United Methodist Church Church of Joy Lutheran Church F. Completes Connection/Linkaqe in Existinq Bicvcle/Pedestrian Network ICateqorv 5) - List and briefly describe the iinkages or connections to existing facilities. The proposed project will provide access to a number of destinations throughout the community. It will designate preferred routes between destinations such as residential and shopping areas. The Industrial Boulevard Bike Route will be located within one mile of the H Street Trolley Station and the Palomar Street Trolley Station. These stations serve Chula Vista Transit Routes 701, 702, 703,704, 706, 707, 709, 712, and San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Route 932 G. Safetv Improvements ICateqorv 6) - Describe the safety issues addressed by the project. If applicable, please attach support documentation for safety and accident history The proposed project will designate preferred and safer routes between destinations such as residen~ial and shopping areas. The proposed project will increase the traffic safety of vehicles and bicycles at the proposed locations. H. Innovation and Desiqn ICateqorv 7) - Describe any design innovations for bicycle/pedestrian priority measures that are included within the project limits. I. Connect to Reqionai Transportation Corridor or Transit Linkaqe or Reqional Bikewav Map (Cateqorv ill - Please iist the project's linkages to any regional bikeway (for bicycle projects) or public transit. The proposed project is included in the City of Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan adopted by the City Council on January 25, 2005 per Council Resolution No. 2005-014. The Industrial Boulevard Bike Route will be located within one mile of the H Street Trolley Station and the Palomar Street Trolley Station. These stations serve Chula Vista Transit Routes 701, 702, 703, 704, 706, 707, 709, 712, and San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Route 932 Project: Bike Routes Various Streets 4 of 5 4-39 ATTACHMENT "8' Is this project in your agency's adopted capital improvement program (Y/N) ~ If the project is part of a iarger capital improvement project, briefly discuss how the bicycle or pedestrian project costs were identified and a description of the other sources of funds for the overall project. The City of Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan prepared by the consultant KTU+A and adopted by Council Resolution No. 2005-014, includes cost estimates and details for each proposed project. This project will be funded with TDAlTransNet Funds. Briefly describe any other aspects of the project that is relevant to its evaluation. Bicvcle Master Plans, Pedestrian Master Plans. Education/Safetv Proqrams and Bicvcle Parkinq Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking projects will each be considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Basic Guidelines Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with population up to 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $75,000. Cities with population greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000. Beginning with the . 2007 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG-approved Bicycle Plan to be eligible for TDNTransNet funds for individuai projects. Pedestrian Master Plans - An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no more frequently than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a' popuiation over 150,000 may submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may submit applications up to $100,000. In either case, the amount of the application must be substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG. . Education/Safety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule to be evaluated by SANDAG staff. . Bicycle Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a projected cost up to $50,000 will be eligible. Project Bike Routes Various Streets 50f5 4-40 ATTACHMENT "8' Bicycle Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 1. Community Support' Must have at least one of the following to Pass/Fail Pass Consistency with qualify. Please attach supporting Community Plan documentation. 1. Resolution or minutes from City Council, County Board of Supervisors, local planning group, or Planning Commission. Or 2. Project is part of a Bicycle Plan that has been approved within the last five years. 2. Minimum Design Standards Must meet the minimum geometric standards Pass/Fail Pass set forth in the Caltrans Highway Design manual. Design exceptions may be presented for consideration by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group with the understanding that initial project proposals must include a design that meets minimum standards. 3. Project Readiness' Projects are eligible for points following completion of each ohase. Feasibility Studv 4 4 Preliminarv En;;¡neertrln-" 4 Environmental Clearance 4 4 Rieht-of-wav ACQuisition 4 4 20 Points Maximum Final Design .. 4 4. Geographic Factorsl Factors contributing to score are: proximity to o to 20 GIS Analysis - population and employment, population and 20 Points Maximum employment densities, and activity centers. 5. Completes Connectionl Provides segment of an identified and 4 4 Linkage in Existing approved bicycle facility. Bicycle Network - Complete connection in existing network or 10 10 10 Points Maximum upgrades Class of facility. . Imoroves safety within existino network. 6. Safety Improvements - 12 12 20 Points Maximum Completes connection in existing network at location with documented safety or accident history A. One to two correctable crashes 4 involving non-motorized users within the last three vears. B. Three to four correctable crashes 6 involving non-motorized users within the last three years. C. Five to six correctable crashes 8 involving non-motorized users within the last three Years. Palle.~~f 2 Bike Routes at Various Locations ATTACHMENT "8' Bicycle Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 7. Innovation and Design - Bicycle priority measures. Dedicated bicycle 10 10 Points Maximum signal heads, queue jumpers, bike box, colored lanes, cul-de-sac connector, bike boulevard, and bike station. 8. Connect to Regionai Project is a part of, or connects to, a regional 10 10 Transportation Corridor or bikeway corridor as identified in the Regional Transit Linkage or Regional - Transportation Plan (RTP) . Bikeway Map 20 Points Maximum Project provides a direct connection to local 14 14 transit stoP. Project provides a direct connection to 20 20 reoional transit station. Subtotal 9. Matching Funds Matching funds can be from any of the (Matching 25 Points Maximum following sources: Funds I 0 1. Identified and approved capital Project funding from identified source. Cost) x 25 Please provide proof in the form of a resolution or letter of approval. 2. Approved match grant. 3. In-kind .services. Please provide adeouate support documentation. 10. Cost Benefit Subtotal Score I Grant Application Amount o to 15 15 Points Maximum Total Score . Previous project milestones must be met before qualifying for subsequent funding. .. Preliminary Engineering and Final Designs will be subject to design review by SANDAG. Bike Routes at Various Locations Pa.! '"-42f 2 ATTACHMENT "B' en en I- en en W en z W a.. en I- a> OW J: 0 ..J :J ..... w:2 ü I- 0 0 en :J enw a:: en 0 a:: :::.::: 0 06 :J en J: en a:: w c::: a.. a:: J: :J Ü :J « ~ o a.. ü cc en cc a.. "C a:::2 ~ rJ) -..Q.- -+c . 0 a> z en a> 0 a. 0 I- 0... - - « en ..... a> a> I- ..... CJ) CJ) :J o o¡:: co > 0') C o co CJ) a> ..... :J o a::: a> ~ o- m ~!11# a~ ~B·5ª u . ATTACHMENT "B' en en f- z z en 0 oUJ UJ < UJ:::æ: f- en enUJ ::J C/) a. f- w 0> 0 w 0 ...J en en () 0.0 0::: -.J ~ ::r: f- eu 00::: en 0 ü C/) UJ 0:::0. 0 0::: 0::: en 0 ::J ::J -.J z 0.::2 ca :r: « ::r: ::J -.J Ü a. ü ca 0 + en 0::: f- en ~ . . +-' +-I CD Q) ~ Q) L. +-' +-I C/) en c: en .- ro :::J ~ 0 0 .- L. +-' CO +-' > CD CD 0) s.... +-' c: C/) 0 .....I - CO E I 0 s.... en '*- Q) - -C +-I s.... :::J ro 0 > cr: CD - :J Q) cooO[ 0 ~ ca .- It ff - aJ ro ï:: ::;¡= +-' en ~ :J ~I~> -C c: ~¡ . 5~ 0 ATTACHMENT "8' (/) l- (/) Z W W (/) (/) I- ::2 (/) w a. :J w ...J :I: ~ 0 6 0 ü a:: 0 ~ a:: (/) a:: :J (/) en a. :I: a:: :I: (/) :J ::2 Ü <: ü :J ID ~ (/) a. ID Q) 0 W Q) (/) W 0 I m z+! a. "0': ~ s..... 0 0 . ~ a:: 0': a. ," en 1.0 en 0 ::) C() I 0 - 0 .- s..... +oJ ro -e > co > 0> Q) - c: ;:] 0 0 en - ro - co .- en L.. +oJ Q) en ~ ;:] ::) "'C t: 0 - a:: E 0 Q) L.. '+- ~ +oJ Q) .- m Q) L.. +oJ C/) t: .- 0< co ~Ið~ ~ §~ :;E ----- ~----- ------ ~--- - -~~..__._--------- ~ ~--- en '+-' Q) Q) s.... '+-' en en ::J o .- s.... CO > C) c: o - CO en Q) '+-' ::J o 0::: (]) ~ .- ca ~~ ð~ ~llj¡ã~ o ATTACHMENT "8' en LU en t- en ::I LU en a. 0 :I: ..J 0 0::: en ü en 0 t- t- o::: ~ 0 en en z ::I 0::: :I: en ::I QLU :I: « ü ::I aJ LU:::iE ü a. en aJ enLU I 0> I w a.0 00::: ~ . z+~ 0::: a. a.:::iE z ~ ~"">J J' '.<t.~ ~ \.- . '" ') ~, I---'k0 \ --¡'í\\ T '~ :-- I-¡ !T\' ~ ." ~«i\ j\"., ~ r "..":;,-:" ~Vo«} ...- r ....,.,~, ,;>......~ r ~ ì ...-::.-::,.-::.-::,,-::,. ~, v_ rt\~ ".v- - /+ .,....,....,.,. ~.<;¡ ~ 'I!I '" !;IE :Jr-: J ...::.:;.":;.";....:.;."::...:;.":;.: 'Ø SC"t' ~a ?' ...-Jr' .............~.............. .,~~ ',$ ~ ,~ :ß~~ \.OS ~ .., ~. 3=?~ ~.:~: .,~:,~:,~ wS\ 7 -....¡;:" ¡,.~~" = ...:;..%::~.;~)~)~~. ~)~~' ¥t$ ú I-- ~ 0'~ rJ¡ ~.~:.;.~;.~;.~;.~.~~~~ \~~ K... .J~'- ,~ ' A ~ P~'Y :~ .~ 7h-J~= ~<;~:<! ]~\. j. (:..- ßo~E~\)-.... "-'- LL >L /#$ ~ j!,\i1 , ""} - .fJ?!.. ~/ f~ w ~_ rh \~~~~~. I- é:.. . ........ II . f "........,.,....", 'n T\ \ ::...- . ."::..:;.:....":.... n ffi~ .......:.:.;.::;."::::;.:.;::;.":;.":; =..... . . .:.::::::.... es~ 2: ;.,,::.:";.::;.:";.,,:::::.::::::::;':'¡''':;''':;.' , . 1-. .......... H~ ,..........,....,....,,,.,... ~ ,.,....,. f..-- - / '\. --',-, ð l' ....,....,.,.,.,.,....,.,.. l- . .:,~:.~:,~.:.~ f..-- '>-:::: t:::: Iff", '~:.~:'~:'~:'~:'~:"::,':~" 25 '---1-- I-- . .............. \-- Y ~ ~0 ~ ......................~..~ ~ f-.....c I '-- '-- _: ··~;.t~:·:·~;.~ "--<.,,-, f- ~PZß ~.x .~.~~;.~.~~;.~;.~.~~.~::, '- -.. ~--, ,.....,.¡ rw¡1 ~. ·~::::::;¡:..Pl ST~ ---J-)- \ ~ iE- :...."::....,,"::.":j.-:...:..... ( [' J- I II ··~;.~I¡· .~~:.~;.~.~ I I __1= '--":-:; ¡::. .~~;.~.,. r-- ,~ . I .::::::;. ""::::;.":;.:')..- ~ ! ~ ...... ............... .......::.~ l,..--Ç.:.)-....// ~ ' c.: ~:,.:.:~:,~:.~:,~:,~:"':,~:,! ...:~.:,~.:~ L--I,--). (¡ í~ ;s" ,..I. ~'<" \-- .:,~:,~:.~:,~:.~:,~:,~:..-:.:;;:,.:~:,~:,~'~~ K~ "" ,y -¡- ~ ~ ..~ ., ~)~)~) \Y' '.If) 'r1 íì\ I.- , ~ Î "j~;'~;'~.~ 6) -W\\ 1 ~ ..-y ~~........ ~ ~ ç:\~ ~ i<èc'~~~, öi~1~!\~~ ~\ ý T 11 mní\ III 1\) p~ \--- 1\ ~ \. \ \ \ II- ?,\~ III ~ d?r I Æ R~~ ~"'I-Í~ ~l _ ,,\ / 0 cf~1.9- 3~¡'-- 10 ~'M~"'-I.- ~~~2;k ~ : 2\~ä \~ E @ > \~~"-X l\.\ª- ~u-~-Illr~ i~ o N CO .c CO - CO o o c: .- E CO o o ....... o s- a> ..c: c..> c: CO 0::: o a> en CO a... E o s- '+- ....... a> Q) s- ....... Cf) ..., ....... en CO W tn ...... (1) ! ...... U) tn ~ o .- s... ns > æ c o - ns U) (1) ...... :::s o D::: (1) ~ .- m ~ ~~¡¡I~> ~~m šª u ~ ATTACHMENT "B' en I- Z OW w::2 enw 0> 0.0 Oe::: e:::o. 0.::2 en w J: () er::: :J J: () ·en ~ e::: ~ en en W en I- ...J a. :::> 0 0 0 0 l- e::: rn J: rn rn () :::> :::> en aJ aJ I I z . ~ .- .... w <i! () en o z . I c ~ - lli.t ~'-.:~. B f'HH 1.I'UiJ''r" ~'" I:!: --. C. .~~~~ 1= ~r m!::--\.l ì l 0 .,/'-" _t. .. .... :.'":;'.. - i ~ ~\ .~,~. . == ' "- ~ :~~~ ~... /\ - ~:.'!.. - . ~ .... .:.-c:.. ". 0 ..... I amm ~~.~~ ~ ~ .... II ~ rrm ..... I\~ = ~ .... ~~ ~ ..... ~, .~~.: .., ~~~~. II. !!I. i.H ~ '; .\ I~~ U I i\j ¿ Ë ~~ :;r~ Yi~¡¡,,:::::::;;:;~ þ;"'r ~ ~t, 0\~~ e-1 \ em:' ë II U c-J ~ <í\\ìl\\; ~ 0 ~ .t: ~ G) ¡, ,a \ ~ I F Ë ~ """ ~... ::\ I.'...", ~ € ~ s::: " ;¡¡i ~ = IEHHEE r- f-I---I I L .... P H. ~ "*" IEHHEE f- f- I-'-- .., \V ~ ~ ~ ~ êI' i'i'11J Effi!'/LJ EHmI r- F=I= "....-:V 3 ;;; C M åffi¡ i'i:HJJ::J Þ 1..Aõii1"-"" '"'" 1\ Em IS'mJ H!!HHIE a: L:;::::; (/' ê "':,¡ ~ \1 .. IIJ' __ L~<- ~ ,,%= è,)~~ 1 L JU 0 --L s::: ~ m~~~ ~ J <-;- CU ~ ~ IJ L: I ~ è5 \\ 1 h I h---< . .., ATTACHMENT "B' Project Title: Bike Routes along Various Streets City of Chula Vista GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT \ ENGINEERING -ADVANCE PALNNING COST ESTIMATE Project Number: DATE: PREPARED BY: CHECKED BY: March 3, 2005 KT\J + A ! No. Description ! Quantity I Unit Unit Amount! ~ !! Price i ¡ ¡ , I ; ~ ",.""",,,." ....""...,.."""..,'''''"'"'....."......._,--_....._......_-''"'''''''-,----,..''',...,..'"~'''''''''''_.-. ""....."".,.-.." .--,,,""'--",""."-... "''''''''''··--'''-''-·''''·''--'1 1 Bike Route Siqns - Main Street Industrial to I -805 i 22 EA $100.00 $2,200.00 .. Bike Route Signs - Industrial Boulevard L Street to , , 2 Main Street I 16 EA $100.00 $1,600.00 Bike Route Signs - Orange Avenue Palomar Street to $1,600.00 3 Hilltop Drive 16 EA $100.00 , East J Street Paseo Ranchero to Camino Calabazo .. I , This is a conversion of the exisbng short Class 2 segment ~ I , Ito Ciass 3 due to adjacent parking needs , I ~ 4 Bike Route Signs 24 EA $100.00 $2,400.00 I 5 Stripe Removal/Sand Blasting 3200 LF $2.20 $7,040.00 ! 61 Pavement Legend Removal 8 EA $100.00 $800.00 I ~ 71 Siqns 8 EA $200.00 $1,600.00 ¡¡ ¡ ~ ~ ! , « f ¡ ; ! I , ~ i ~ I I I ¡ j 1 , ¡ ! , i L.,.... ".".;"."'.,,""';'".,,"""""""_'".'",...,,";"'.~'""';"';;,...'""';,"''''.;"'.,;_,.,";;""..,..,"""""""_"_;..".,,..;~'"~;m"".."''''''''"''''''""'" ·,·",,,.,,,,,,..~u,._~,,",,," ,,",.'"'.''''''';''''"''''''"'-'''''-"''''"''''''"'''''''"'''~''''''''";''"'"'''"""."",,'"'" ",,"-"''''--~''''' 10.0 5.01 7.0' Subtotal: % I $ 17,240.00 $ 3,448.00 '''''''''''''''''~''''''"-'''''''o'''';'==''''''''='''''''''ç [Subtotal: $ 20,688.00 ; % [$ 20,688.00 [ $ 2,068.80 % I $ 20,688.00 ! $ 1,034.40 % ¡ $ 20,688.00 I $ 1,448.16 U":"._11.?~40£.~j Contingencies Construction & Contingecies: Staff Costs (Engineering/Design) Staff Costs (Administration) Staff Costs (Construction management) 20.0; TOTAL: 1$ 25,239.36 I 03/1412005 Bicycle Class f~Aias-Cost Est.xls ATTACHMENT "S' Bike Route - Main Street Looking West ."- I -- Bike Route - Main Str:eet Looking East Project Title: Bike Routes along Various Streets 4-01'1<8 ATTACHMENT "8' Bike Route - Industrial Boulevard Looking North ,,' , . .",'." Bike Route - Industrial Boulevard Looking South Project Title: Bike Routes along Various Streets ~ ef5{) ATTACHMENT "8' Bike Route - Orange Avenue Looking East Bike Route - Orange A ~enue Looking East Project Title: Bike Routes along Various Streets 4,,641 ATTACHMENT "B' " '- Bike Route (conversion from Class 2) - East J Street Looking West Bike Route (conversion from ClasS:2) - East J Street Looking West Project Title: Bike Routes along Various Streets 4ro'ii 4 ATTACHMENT "8" Annual Grant Application Transportation Development ActfTransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: East H Street Bicycle Lane Gap Connector Project Limits: Bike Path & Bike Lane west of Buena Vista Way to Otay Lakes Road Contact Person: Roberto Solórzano Title: Assistant Engineer Address City of Chula Vista Engineering Division 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Phone: (619) 409-5420 Fax: (619) 691-5171 E-mail: solo(cj)ci.chula-vista.ca.us Person .Authorized to Submit Application: I certify that I have reviewed the BicyCle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines and the information submitted in this application is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines. Samir Nuhailv Name Senior Civil Enoineer Title Signature Date Project: East H Street Gap Connector 10f5 4-53 ATTACHMENT "8" Project FundinQ: Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed project estimate based on best available engineering) See Attachment 2 Revenues (Source and Amount): Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Selection Criteria) $1.040.900 Revenue Source Amount BTA Funds $500.000 Total $500.000 TDAlTransNet (Application Amount as shown in Category 10 of Project Selection Criteria) $540.900 Total Revenues $1.040.900 SupportinQ Materials A. Communitv SupportlConsistencv with Communitv Plan (Cateoorv 1) - The councilor governing board of the applicant must authorize this grant application. Please attach a copy of the resolution or minute order documenting that action. Or, if the project is part of an approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a copy of the section that includes the project. City Staff will submit a Resolution on April 5, 2005 to Council approving application. B. Minimum Desion Standards (Cateoorv 2) - Typical cross-sections and photographs (if applicable) that indicate project conditions and any significant features that affect feasibility and/or cost. See Attachment 1 C. Proiect Readiness (Cateoorv 3) Phase Beqin Complete Feasibility Study Aug-2005 Oct-2005 Preliminary Engineering Nov-2005 Jan-2006 Environmental Document/Certification Feb-2006 Apr-2006 Final Design May-2006 Jul-2006 Advertise for Construction Aug-2006 Sep-2006 Project: East H Street Gap Connector 2 of 5 4-54 ATTACHMENT "8" Begin Construction Project Completion Jan-2007 Mar-200? Mar-200? Apr-200? D. Geooraphic Factors/GIS Anaivsis rCateoorv 4) - SANDAG will perform a GIS analysis as described in the Bicycie and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines based upon a project map provided by the applicant. Briefty describe project limits and provide a location map clearly showing the project alignment. In addition, clearly show and label the following elements: a. major traffic generators within the project area (within Y,-mile for pedestrian projects and within 1-mile for bicycle projects) b. linkage or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities c. linkage to any regional bikeway or public transit stop The proposed bike lane will connect to an existing bike lane on Otay Lakes Road and East H Street E. Geooraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis rCateoorv 4) - List and briefty describe major traffic generators served by the project. Southwestern Community College Bonita Vista High School Tiffany Elementary Rancho del Rey Middle School Casillas Elementary School Chula Vista Hills Elementary Bonita Vista Middle School Discovery Elementary Voyager Park Explorer Park Discovery Park Bonita Haciendas Mini-Park Tiffany Park Rancho del Rey Park Independence Park Rancho del Rey Center Employment Development Center Fire Station #54 Fire Training Tower YMCA Church of Joy Lutheran Church First United Methodist Church Church of Latter Day Saints Risen Savior Evangelical Lutheran Church Bonita Pointe Plaza Park & Ride Rancho del Rey Business Center F. Completes Connection/Linkaoe in Existino Bicvcle/Pedestrian Network rCateoorv 5) - List and briefly describe the linkages or connections to existing facilities. The project will provide a major improvement to the existing bikeway system (Class 2 bike lane) along East "H" Street by connecting the more than Y, mile gap between existing bikeway facilities along "H" Street/East "H" Street/Proctor Valley Road. The proposed improvements Project: East H Street Gap Connector 30f5 4-55 ATTACHMENT "8" will run alongside residential and the Southwestern Community College Campus and proceed easterly to the commercial areas near Otay lakes Road G. Safetv Improvements (Cateoorv 6) - Describe the safety issues addressed by the project. If applicable, please attach support documentation for safety and accident history This project will construct a Class 1 bike route and Class 2 bike lanes that will connect the more than % mile gap between the existing facilities. Existing bike lanes abruptly end 650 feet west of Buena Vista Way and resume 0.57 miles east at Otay lakes Road. The proposed project will provide direct connectivity between the two existing bike lane segments and provide a safe route for bicycle commuters from the surrounding residential subdivisions to their destinations. H. Innovation and Desion (Cateoorv 7) - Describe any design innovations for bicycle/pedestrian priority measures that are included within the project limits. L Connect to Reoional Transportation Corridor or Transit Linkaoe or Reoional Bikewav Map (Cateoorv ID - Please list the projects linkages to any regional bikeway (for bicycle projects) or public transit. CVT Bus Route 709 "H" Street Station-Southwestern College-Eastlake Via East "H" Street, Otay lakes Road & lakeshore Drive. CVT Bus Route 707 "H" Street Station-Sharp Chula Vista Hospital & Medical Center Via East "H" Street & Paseo ladera. CVT Bus Route 704 "H" Street Station-Southwestern College Via 4th Avenue, Naples Street, East Palomar & Otay Ranch. CVT Bus Route 705 Bayfront Station-Southwestern College Via Bonita Road &. Otay lakes Road. CVT Bus Route 711 Plaza Bonita-Southwestern College-Eastlake Greens Via Bonita Road, Corral Canyon Road & Otay lakes Road. Is this project in your agency's adopted capital improvement program (Y/N) ~ The East H Street Bike lane Gap Connector Project will be constructed concurrently with another planned street improvement project on Otay lakes Road which is located at the east end of this bikeway project. Both will be programmed as part of the City's FY2005-06 Capital Improvement Program. Combining the bikeway and roadway projects leverages available resources, thus ensuring that the bikeway project will not only be completed on schedule but that it is as cost-effective as possible. If the project is part of a larger capital improvement project, briefly discuss how the bicycle or pedestrian project costs were identified and a description of the other sources of funds for the overall project. Project: East H Street Gap Connector 4 of 5 4-56 ATTACHMENT "8" The City of Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan prepared by the consultant KTU+A and adopted by Council Resolution No. 2005-014, includes cost estimates and details for each proposed project. This project will be funded with BTA and TDAlTransNet Funds. Briefiy describe any other aspects of the project that is relevant to its evaluation. Bicvcle Master Plans. Pedestrian Master Plans, Education/Safetv Proc¡rams and Bicvcle Parkinc¡ Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking projects wiil each be considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Basic Guidelines Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with population up to 75,000 wiil be eligible for a maximum of $75,000. Cities with population greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000. Beginning with the 2007 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG-approved Bicycle Plan to be eligible for TDAlTransNet funds for individual projects. · Pedestrian Master Plans - An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no more frequently than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a population over 150,000 may submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may submit applications up to $100,000. In either case, the amount of the application must be substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG, · Education/Safety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule to be evaluated by SANDAG staff. · Bicycle Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a projected cost up to $50,000 wiil be eligible. Project: East H Street Gap Connector 5 of 5 4-57 ATTACHMENT "8" Bicycle Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 1. Community Support! Must have at least one of the following to Pass/Fail Pass Consistency with qualify. Please attach supporting Community Plan documentation. 1. Resolution or minutes from City Council, County Board of Supervisors, local planning group, or Planning Commission. Or 2. Project is part of a Bicycle Plan that has been approved within the last five years. 2. Minimum Design Standards Must meet the minimum geometric standards Pass/Fail Pass set forth in the Caltrans Highway Design manual. Design exceptions may be presented for consideration by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group with the understanding that initial project proposals must include a design that meets minimum standards. 3. Project Readiness' Projects are eligible for points following . completion of each phase. Feasibility Study 4 4 Preliminary EnQineerinQ .. 4 Environmental Clearance 4 Rk1ht-of-wav Acquisition 4 4 20 Points Maximum Final Design .. 4 4. Geographic Factors/ Factors contributing to score are: proximity to o to 20 GIS Analysis - population and employment, population and 20 Points Maximum employment densities, and activity centers. 5. Completes Connection/ Provides segment of an identified and 4 4 Linkage in Existing approved bicycle facility. Bicycle Network - Complete connection in existing network or 10 10 10 Points Maximum upgrades Class of facility. 6. Safety Improvements - Improves safetv within existina network. 12 12 20 Points Maximum Completes connection in existing network at location with documented safety or accident history A. One to two correctable crashes 4 involving non-motorized users within the last three vears. B. Three to four correctable crashes 6 involving non-motorized users within the last three years. C. Five to six correctable crashes 8 involving non-motorized users within the last three vears. East H Street Bike Lane Gap Connector Pal e..ö9' 2 Bicycle Project Selection Criteria Matrix ATTACHMENT "S" Category Criteria Potential Score Points 7. Innovation and Design - Bicycle priority measures. Dedicated bicycle 10 10 Points Maximum signal heads, queue jumpers, bike box, colored lanes, cul-de-sac connector, bike boulevard, and bike station. 8. Connect to Regional Project is a part of, or connects to, a regional 10 10 Transportation Corridor or bikeway corridor as identified in the Regional Transit Linkage or Regional - Transportation Plan (RTP) . Bikeway Map 20 Points Maximum Project provides a direct connection to local 14 14 transit stoo. Project provides a direct connection to 20 20 reqional transit station. Subtotal 9. Matching Funds Matching funds can be from any of the (Matching 25 Points Maximum following sources: Funds I 12 1. Identified and approved capital Project funding from identified source. Cost) x 25 Please provide proof in the form of a resolution or letter of approval. 2. Approved match grant. 3. In-kind services. Please provide adeauate succort documentation. 10. Cost Benefit Subtotal Score I Grant Application Amount o to 15 15 Points Maximum Total Score . Previous project milestones must be met before qualifying for subsequent funding. .. Preliminary Engineering and Final Designs will be subject to design review by SANDAG. East H Street Bike Lane Gap Connector Péì1IliSSf2 ATTACHMENT "8" Looking Eastbound on East "H" Street: The Class 2 bike lane ends abruptly 650 ft west of Buena Vista WayÆast "H" Street. The proposed project will continue the Class 2 bike lane to Otay Lakes Rd. East "H" Street and Otav Lakes Road: A proposed Class 1 bike path will connect cyclists coming from the west of the City to the Southwestern Co=unity College located at this intersection. Project Titre: East "H" Street Bicycle Lane Gap Connector 1 of4-60 ATTACHMENT "8" South side of East "H" Street in front of Southwestern Co=unitv College and Davcare Center: Site of proposed Class 1 bike path. South side of East "H" Street: A proposed Class 1 bike path would begin at Buena Vista Way and proceed easterly to Otay Lakes Road. Project Title: East "H· Street Bicycle Lane Gap Connector 20f4-61 ~ o J- () W Z Z o ü a.. « (9 w~ z:5 «~ ~ö w~ ~~ aJs J-~ w~ W<c ~~ I-ffi C/)LL o II- CJ) J-UJ C/)S «ß wtt ATTACHMENT "8" 00 I- Z w 00 :2: w W I- > 00 00 :J 0 .. w 00 C- O a::: J: ...J 0 a::: ü 00 0 C- a::: :::.::: 0 I- 00 :2: 00 :J :J a::: J: 00 [Q 0 J: « ü w ü C- oo :J I 00 [Q 0 ....... I C- ........ ic ....... . 0 ...:....:... ....... a::: ....... ....... C- ....... z+1 o <C o C( CJ) UJ ATTACHMENT "8" City of Chula Vista GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT \ ENGINEERING -ADVANCE PALNNING COST ESTIMATE Project Number: Project Title: DATE: March 8, 2005 East H 5treet Bike Lane Gap Connector PREPARED BY: KTU+A west of Buena Vista to Otay Lakes Roac CHECKED BY: No. Description Quantity Unit Unit ~. Bikeway Costs Price Ratio! Amount 1 12' PCC Bike Path/sidewalk 29040 SF $5.00 1 $145 200.00 2 Sidewalk west of Buena Vista Wav 5200 SF $6.00 1 $31,200.00 3 Retainino wall 3880 SF $60.00 0.5 $116,400.00 4 StriDina 1300 LF $3.50 1 $4,550.00 s Bike Lane Svmbols 2EA $200.00 1 $400.00 6 Curb & Gutter 1500 LF $25.00 1 $37,500.00 7 Pedestrian Ramo lEA $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 B Sionai Modification ll.S $40.000.00 1 $40,000.00 9 Curb inlet lEA $6,000.00 1 $6.000.00 10 18" RCP 10 LF $90.00 1 $900.00 11 N PDES Filter lEA $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 12 Traffic Control ll.S $25,000.00 0.4 $10.000.00 13 Clearina & Grubbino 37900 SF $S.OO 0.5 $94,750.00 14 Tree Removal 10 EA $1,500.00 1 $15,000.00 15 LandscaDino & Irriaation 37900 SF $5.00 0.5 $94,750.00 16 Demolition lLS $50,000.00 0.5 $25,000.00 . Subtotal: $ 633,150.00 Contingencies 20.0 % $ 633,150.00 $ 126,630.00 Construction & Contingecies: I Subtotal: ¡ $ 759,780.00 I Staff Costs (Engineering/Design/Survey) 25.C % $ 759,780.00 1$ 189,945.00 Staff Costs (Administration) 5.0 % $ 759,780.00 1$ 37,989.00 Staff Costs (Construction management) 7.0 % $ 759,780.00 1$ 53,184.60 TOTAL: D $ 1,040,898.60 I 4-63 ATTACHMENT "B" Annual Grant Application Transportation Development ActlTransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: Bay Boulevard Bike Lane between F Street and J Street Project Limits: Bay Bou levard between F Street and J Street Contact Person: Francisco X. Rivera Title: Deputy City Engineer City of Chula Vista Address Engineering Division 276 Fourth Avenue Chuia Vista, Caiifornia 91910 Phone: (619) 691-5045 Fax: (619) 691-5171 E-maii: frivera©cLchula-vista.ca.us Person Authorized to Submit Appiication: I certify that I have reviewed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guideiines and the information submitted in this appiication is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines. Samir Nuhaiiv Name Senior Civii Enoineer Titie Signature Date Project: Bay Boulevard Bike Lane, F Street to J Street 1 of 5 4-64 ATTACHMENT "8" Project FundinCl: Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed project estimate based on best available engineering) See Attachment 2 Revenues (Source and Amount): Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Selection Criteria) $58.600 Revenue Source Amount Total TDAlTransNet (Application Amount as shown in Category 10 of Project Selection Criteria) $58.600 Total Revenues $58.600 SupportinCl Materials A. Community Support/Consistencv with Communitv Plan (Cateqorv 1) - The council or governing board of the applicant must authorize this grant application. Please attach a copy of the resolution or minute order documenting that action. Or, if the project is part of an approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a copy of the section that includes the project. City Staff will submit a Resolution on April 5,2005 to Council approving application. B. Minimum Desiqn Standards (Cateqorv 2) - Typical cross-sections and photographs (if applicable) that indicate project conditions and any significant features that affect feasibility and/or cost. See Attachment 1 C. Proiect Readiness (Cateqorv 3) Phase BeClin Complete Oct-2005 Nov-2005 Feasibility Study Preliminary Engineering Environmental Document/Certification Oct-2005 Nov-2005 N/A N/A Final Design Advertise for Construction Dec-2005 Jan-2006 Dec-2005 Jan-2006 Project: Bay Boulevard Bike Lane, F Street to J Street 2 of 5 4-65 . ATTACHMENT "8" Begin Construction Project Completion Mar-2006 Apr -2006 Mar-2006 Apr-2006 D. Geoqraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateqorv 4) - SANDAG will perform a GIS analysis as described in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines based upon a project map provided by the applicant. Briefly describe project limits and provide a location map clearly showing the project alignment. In addition, clearly show and label the following elements: a. major traffic generators within the project area (within %-mile for pedestrian projects and within 1-mile for bicycle projects) b. linkage or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities c. linkage to any regional bikeway or public transit stop The proposed bike lane will connect to an existing bike lane on Bay Boulevard south of J Street E. Geoqraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateqorv 4) - List and briefiy describe major traffic generators served by the project. The proposed bike lane along Bay Boulevard is located within one mile of: Feaster Elementary School Vista Square Elementary School Chula Vista Middle School Chula Vista High School Mueller Elementary School Chula Vista Learning Community Charter Elementary Chula Vista Shopping Center Transit Routes H Street Trolley Station BayfrontiE Street Trolley Station Pilgrim Evangelical Lutheran Church First Baptist Church Filipino & American Bible Baptist Church First Free Will Baptist Church Church of God of Chula Vista Calvary Chapel Church of Christ South Bay Baptist Church World Harvest Church F. Completes Connection/Linkaqe in Existinq Bicvcle/Pedestrian Network (Cateqorv 5) - List and briefly describe the linkages or connections to existing facilities. This segment would expand the City's bicycle facilities northward and provide a safer and more consistent ride for bicyclists. Class 2 lanes are currently in place on the southern portion of this road. Project: Bay Boulevard Bike Lane, F Street to J Street 3 of 5 4-66 ATTACHMENT "8" The proposed project will be located within one mile of the H Street Trolley Station and the BayfrontlE Street Trolley Station. These stations serve Chula Vista Transit Routes 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 70SA, 707, 708, 709, and San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Route 932 G. Safetv Improvements (Cateoorv 6) - Describe the safety issues addressed by the project. If applicable, please attach support documentation for safety and accident history The proposed project will increase the traffic safety of vehicles and bicycles at the proposed location. H. Innovation and Desion ICateoorv 7) - Describe any design innovations for bicycle/pedestrian priority measures that are included within the project limits. L Connect to Reoional Transportation Corridor or Transit Linkaoe or Reoional Bikewav Map (Cateoorv §l- Please list the project's linkages to any regional bikeway (for bicycle projects) or public transit. The proposed project is included in the City of Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan adopted by the City Council on January 25, 2005 per Council Resolution No. 2005-014. . The proposed project will be located within one mile of the H Street Trolley Station and the BayfrontlE Street Trolley Station. These stations serve Chula Vista Transit Routes 701, 702, 703,704,705, 70SA, 707, 708, 709, and San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Route 932. Is this project in your agency's adopted capital improvement program (Y/N) t:! if the project is part of a larger capital Improvement project, briefly discuss how the bicycle or pedestrian project costs were identified and a description of the other sources of funds for the overall project. The City of Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan prepared by the consultant KTU+A and adopted by Council Resolution No. 2005-014, includes cost estimates and details for each proposed project. This project will be funded with TDAlTransNet Funds. Briefly describe any other aspects of the project that is relevant to its evaluation. Bicvcle Master Plans. Pedestrian Master Plans. Education/Safety Proqrams and Bicvcle Parkinq Project: Bay Boulevard Bike Lane, F Street to J Street 4 of 5 4-67 ATTACHMENT "8" Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking projects will each be considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Basic Guidelines Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with population up to 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $75,000. Cities with population greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000. Beginning with the 2007 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG-approved Bicycle Plan to be eligible for TDAlTransNet funds for individual projects. · Pedestrian Master Plans - An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no more frequently than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a population over 150,000 may submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may submit applications up to $100,000. In either case, the amount of the application must be substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG. · Education/Safety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule to be evaluated by SANDAG staff. · Bicycle Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a projected cost up to $50,000 will be eligible. Project: Bay Boulevard Bike Lane, F Street to J Street 5 of 5 4-68 ATTACHMENT "8" Bicycle Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 1. Community Support! Must have at least one of the following to Pass!Fail Pass Consistency with qualify. Please attach supporting Community Plan documentation. 1. Resoiution or minutes from City Council, County Board of Supervisors, local planning group, or Planning Commission. Or 2. Project is part of a Bicycle Plan that has been approved within the last five years. 2. Minimum Design Standards Must meet the minimum geometric standards Pass!F ail Pass set forth in the Caltrans Highway Design manual. Design exceptions may be presented for consideration by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group with the understanding that initial project proposals must include a design that meets minimum standards. 3. Project Readiness' Projects are eligible for points following completion of each phase. Feasibility Study 4 4 Preliminarv Enaineerina .. 4 Environmental Clearance 4 Rioht-of-wav Acauisition 4 4 20 Points Maximum Final Design .. 4 4. Geographic Factors! Factors contributing to score are: proximity to o to 20 GIS Analysis - population and employment, population and 20 Points Maximum employment densities, and activity centers. 5. Completes Connection! Provides segment of an identified and 4 4 Linkage in Existing approved bicycle facility. Bicycle Network - Complete connection in existing network or 10 10 10 Points Maximum upgrades Class of facility. 6. Safety Improvements - Improvessafetv within existino network. 12 12 20 Points Maximum Completes connection in existing network at location with documented safety or accident history A. One to two correctable crashes 4 involving non-motorized users within the last three vears. B. Three to four correctable crashes 6 involving non-motorized users within the last three vears. C. Five to six correctable crashes 8 involving non-motorized users within the last three vears. Bay Boulevard Bike Lane Pa~"Sf 2 ATTACHMENT "8" Bicycle Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 7. Innovation and Design - Bicycle priority measures. Dedicated bicycle 10 10 Points Maximum signal heads, queue jumpers, bike box, colored lanes, cul-de-sac connector, bike boulevard, and bike station. 8. Connect to Regional Project is a part of, or connects to, a regional 10 10 Transportation Corridor or bikeway corridor as identified in the Regionai Transit Linkage or Regional - Transportation Plan (RTP) . Bikeway Map 20 Points Maximum Project provides a direct connection to local 14 14 transit stoP. Project provides a direct connection to 20 20 reoional transit station. Subtotal 9. Matching Funds Matching funds can be from any of the (Matching 25 Points Maximum following sources: Funds I 0 1. Identified and approved capital Project funding from identified source. Cost) x 25 Please provide proof in the form of a resolution or letter of approval. 2. Approved match grant. 3. In-kind services. Please provide adeouate support documentation. 10. Cost Benefit Subtotal Score I Grant Application Amount o to 15 15 Points Maximum Total Score . Previous project milestones must be met before qualifying for subsequent funding. .. Preliminary Engineering and Final Designs will be subject to design review by SANDAG. . Bay Bou!evard Bike Lane Pal .e.;V af 2 ATTACHMENT "8" 0 z < N 0:: ..0 >--' 0::: aJO (/) W 0 l.L..f- WO l.L..Z 0::1- ::JW <0:: o..W 00:::2: X WaJ 0::0 OW « 0..0:: WU1 ¿ Q..~ « ~~ ~ 00::: N Z« :5 rn I.{') q -, ~ Z ¡¡..II.{') 0 0 - I.{') LO Þ-4 N ~ E-4 ..- U « U WW I- ~ LO - ¡¡¡~ µ:¡ (/) to rn N ~t > I"") 0 ~ N ~ « E-4 ---I "<t- O w ::::> ~ ..- ---.J « :c ~ - LO eJ U 0 ü ~ to (í) lL. E-4 0 0 rn "<t- I--! z ~\ ..- I--! >- LO 0 I--! I- ~ N Ü N -< I"") WW to "'z 1f1 u ¡¡;j Þ-4 - 1f1 P-t LO r- N ~ ~ ..- I.{') E-4 ¡¡..I- d-~ ~ I.{') I.{') U 0::: W l.L..f- ~ l.L..z X N ::Jw « 00:::2: ¿ ui OW WU1 ~I- Q..~ ..- 0 I Z I-(/) « N < W~ ~~ N W 0:: Iu.. 00::: 0 (/)0 -' z« 0 :5 ;>.:(/) IJ1 aJo e l- e Zo:: N 3:w wi <aJ 1-0:: 0::0 « 4-71 00:: 0::; -_._._-~--~.._~---_.._._._---_.- _".m_____~"__.~_______ II JI .... ~ C1) z e QLU en LU::æ: en LU .... enLU >-en LU en I- tn 0> en I a. ::J a.0 -I LUZ Ü ~ 0 0 00::: 0 -10 0::: I- 0::: 0 -1- 0::: ., 0::: a. O!;;( ::J en en a.::æ: I I c: en ::J Ü O:::¡....; oð en I-en Ü ::J IIJ IIJ .... C1) ~ e II . . .... tn LL C C1) C1) ! C1) .c C1) c ns ...J C1) JI::: o- m "'C .... ns > C1) - ~ 0 m ~ m ~ LU ~Ið~ - z+~ ~j 8~ Õ 4-72 "- --~---_._~ -.-----_.~._----- ATTACHMENT "8" City of Chula Vista GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT \ ENGINEERING -ADVANCE PALNNING COST ESTIMATE Project Number: Project Title: DATE: February 14, 2005 Bay Boulevard between F Street and J Streef PREPARED BY: KTU+A CHECKED BY: No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Amount Price 1 Bike lane stripino 10560 LF $1.25 $13,200.00 2 Bike lane sionino SEA $100.00 $800.00 3 Striae removal/sand blastino 5500 LF $2.20 $12.100.00 4 Pavement leoend removal 10 EA $100.00 $1 000.00 5 Restriae centerline / raised markers 5500 LF $2.20 $12,100.00 6 Pavement bike leaends SEA $100.00 $800.00 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Subtotal: $ 40,000.00 Contingencies 20.01 0/0 $ 40,000.00 $ 8,000.00 Construction &. Contingecies: Subtotal: $ 48.000.00 I Staff Costs (Engineering/Design) 10.0 % $ 48,000.00 $ 4,800.00 Staff Costs (Administration) 5.0 % $ 48,000.00 $ 2,400.00 Staff Costs (Construction management) 7.0 % $ 48,000.00 $ 3,360.00 TOTAL: I $ 58,560.00 I 4-73 ATTACHMENT "8" Bay Boulevard Looking North Bay Boulevard L!Joking South Project Tit!e: Bay Boulevard Bike Lane between F Street and he"tt1 RESOLUTION NO. 2004- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF SIX GRANT APPLICATIONS TO SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) FOR FY 2005-06 TDA AND TRANSNET FUNDING FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City annually participates in the claim process for Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) bicycle and pedestrian project funds by submitting an updated list of projects to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG); and WHEREAS, SANDAG regulations require that official applications be submitted to SANDAG in order for projects to be considered by its Board of Directors for funding; and WHEREAS, in order for the application to be official, the City Council must approve a resolution authorizing submittal of the FY 2005-06 project applications; and WHEREAS, for FY2005-06, the City is requesting funds for the following improvement projects: 1. Bay boulevard bike lane between F Street and J Street. 2. Bike routes along various streets. 3. East H Street bike Gap connector, west of Buena Vista Way to Otay Lakes Road. 4. Pedestrian Master Plan. 5. Castle Park Elementary School sidewalk improvements. 6. Fourth Avenue sidewalk improvements, fiom 1 Street to Orange Avenue. WHEREAS, these four projects were selected because they closely follow the eligibility guidelines for TDA and TransNet funding; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City ofChula Vista does hereby authorize the submittal of four grant applications to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) for FY 2005-06 TDA and TransNet Funding for bicycle and pedestrian capital improvements. Presented by Approved as to form by Dc-7,~ Jack Griffin Director of General Services Ann Moore City Attorney ATTORNEYl.reso\GrantsIGRANTSANDAG 2005.doc 4-75 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item -ª-- Meeting Date 4/5/05 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Authorizing the collection of assessments on the County tax roll for the construction of certain public improvements in Assessment District 2002-1 (Quintard Street) SUBMITTED BY: Director of General service~~. City Manager h [¿"'\JV" pel (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ NoX) REVIEWED BY: On July 22,2003, pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (the "Block Act") and Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State ofCalifomia ("Article XIIID''), Council awarded the construction contract to Star Paving, Inc., for the construction of sidewalk improvements on Quintard Street between Third Avenue and Orange Avenue. The work is now complete and improvements have been accepted by the City Manager. On December 14, 2004, Resolution 2004- 395 was adopted to accept filing of the Engineer's Report on the cost of construction and to set the public hearing on the assessments and Resolution 2004-396 was also adopted to approve the deferral of the payment of assessments and to establish the rate of interest payable on the unpaid balance of such assessments and financing period. Resolution 2005-026 confirmed the Engineer's Report on the cost of construction and Resolution 2005-027 assessed the costs of construction and ordered the recordation of a Notice of Lien for the Quintard Street Assessment District AD 2002-1. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution authorizing the collection of assessments on the County tax roll for the construction of certain public improvements in Assessment District 2002-1 (Quintard Street). BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: On January 25,2005, Council adopted Resolutions 2005-026 and 2005-027, which confirmed the Engineer's Report on the cost of construction of certain public improvements in Assessment District 2002-1 (Quintard Street), assessed the costs of construction, and ordered the recordation of a Notice of Lien. In addition, the Council Agenda Statement indicated that the City shall bill the property owners in-house rather than placing the installments on the County tax roll. However, the City Finance Department has decided that the assessment taxes shall be collected on the County tax roll. The assessment taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes. 5-1 Page 2, Item 5- Meeting Date 4/5/05 FISCAL IMP ACT: A total of$450,832 was appropriated for planning and design work fiom the Gas Tax fund, Community Development Block Grant, Residential Construction Tax, and Transportation Development Act funds for the construction of missing sidewalk improvements, utility underground conversion, and pavement reconstruction along Quintard Street, between Third and Fourth Avenues. A total of$44,998.76 shall be the property owner's share (concrete driveway aprons) of the total construction cost. Ofthe total property owner's share of$44,998.76, $24,302.49 was repaid to the City by the property owners within the 3 O-day prepayment period (fiom January 26, 2005 through February 25, 2005). The remaining property owner's share will be paid over a ten-year period at 5 percent interest. Attachments: A. Resolutions 2003-093, 2003-094, 2003-095, 2003-096, 2003-178, 2003-179, 2003-305, 2004-395,2004-396,2005-026,2005-027 B. Engineer's Report J:\General Services\GS Administration\Council Agenrla\Quintard St Assessment\Quintard Street County Tax Roll AI13.jcm.doc 5-2 ATTACHMENT A 5-3 RESOLUTION NO. 2003-093 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA ACCEPTING A PETITION REQUESTING TIIE FORMATION OF AN ASSESSMENT DISTRlCI' TO INCLUDE A PORTION OF QUINTARD STREET FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING TIIE CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, has been presented and has received a petition from certain property owners requesting the installation of certain improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and street improvements on Quintard Street between Third and Fourth Avenues, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, such improvements to be installed pursuant to the provisions and authority of Chapter 27 of the "Improvement Act of 1911", being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, such petition requests that such improvements be financed through the formation of an assessment district pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27, such assessment district to be known and designated as Assessment District No. 2002-1 (Quintard Street) (the "Assessment District''). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. It is hereby found that: A. Such petition has been signed by the owners owning land constituting more than sixty percent (60%) of (i) the fiont footage of the unimproved portion of the block requested by such owners to be improved and (ll) all assessable land proposed to be included within the boundaries of the Assessment.District. B. Such petition meets all of the requirements of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931/' beÏI!~ Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code öf the Statè of CalìfomÍa (the "Investigations Act"). SECTION 3. No further proceedings or limitations under the Investigations Act shall be applicable to these proceedings. SECTION 4. This petition shall be as a part of the record of these proceedings and shall be open to public inspection as required by law. 5-4 Resolution 2003-093 Page 2 Presented by Approved as to form by ~¡¿~ . Swanson En eering Director (þ..~ Ann Moore City Attomey PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 4th day of March, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: CounciImembers: Davis, Rindone, Salas, McCann and Padilla NAYS: Counci1members: None ABSENT: CounciImembers: None ATrEST: jJ n J f] jJi-- ~ðll~· - ~6-u~ç¿, !J C>_ J Susan Bigelow, City Qefk' STATE OF CAUFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bige.Jow, City Clerk of ('hula Vist!!, C'4I!ifornia, do !le.reby certify that tÌ1e foregoing Resolution No. 2003-093 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 4th day of March, 2003. Executed this 4th day of March, 2003. - tLJ...LL~c:r~ Susan Bigelow, City ClefIê 5-5 RESOLUTION NO. 2003-094 RESOLUl10N OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRlcr NO. 2002-1 (QUINTARD STREET) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City Of Chula Vista, California, has been presented and has received a map showing and describing the boundaries of the area proposed to be assessed in an assessment district under the provisions and authority of Chapter 27 of the "Improvement Act of 1911", being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; said assessment district known and designated as Assessment District No. 2002-1 (Quintard Street) (the "Assessment District"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. A map showing the boundaries of the proposed Assessment District and lands and property to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of the proposed acquisition of certain public improvements designated as "Proposed Boundaries of Assessment District No. 2002-1 (Quintard Street)" is hereby submitted, and the same is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 3. The original map of the boundaries of the proposed Assessment District and one copy thereof is to be fIled in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 4. A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one copy of the map of the Assessment District, evidencing the date and adoption of this resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the resolutionf¡xing the time and place of hearing on the formation or extent of the Assessment District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia. Presented by Approved as to form by ~~~A1~ Engmeering Director CA~ Ann Moore City Attorney 5-6 ._~ --_."._----~----_._.._,_._---'-~._. Resolution 2003-094 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 4th day of March, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Davis, Rindone, Salas, McCann and Padilla NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None A'ITEST: cQAL dilla, Mayor ~.'6~ðl]~ Susan Bigelow, City Clttk STATE OF CAI-IFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2003-094 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 4th day of March, 2003. Executed this 4th day of March, 2003. j.u.d..4 ~ f(:<_l)~ Susan Bigelow, City Clerit"' 5-7 RESOLUTION NO. 2003-095 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA ORDERING THE INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON QUINTARD STREET, APPROVING THE PREUMINARY ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT, SETI'ING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBUC HEARING, AND ORDERING THE INITIATION OF BALLOT PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS, the City Council (the "City Council) of the City of ChuIa Vista (the "City'~, Calüornia, has been presented and has received a petition from certain property owners requesting the installation of certain improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and street improvements on Quintard Street between Third and Fourth Avenues, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, such improvements to be installed pursuant to the provisions and authority of Chapter 27 ("Chapter 27'~of the ''Improvement Act of 1911", being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Calüornia; and WHEREAS, the City Council, acting in response to such petition, desires to initiate proceedings to order the installation of such sidewalk improvements pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27 and to initiate proceedfugs pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and fOllowing) (the "Implementation Act'~ (Chapter 27, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Law") to form an assessment district for the purpose of financing the cost of the installation of certain of those improvements, such assessment district to be known and designated as Assessment District No. 2002-1 (Quintard Street) (the "Assessment District''); and WHEREAS, there has been prepared and filed with this legislative body a report (the "Report") of the City Engineer, acting as the Assessment Engineer, pertaining to the proposed Assessment District as provided for in and required by the Assessment Law and the Report has been presented to this legislative body for its consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Description of Improvements. The public interest and convenience requires, and this City Council hereby orders the iristallation of the following public improvements (the "Improvements": Curb, gutter, sidewalk and street improvements on Quintard Street betweeD Third and Fourth Avenues, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications. All of the Improvements shall be generally constructed at the grades, along the lines, between the points, and at the places and in the manner as shown OD the plans and specifications for such Improvements designated by the name and number of the Assessment District which are on file in the office of the Director of Public 5-8 Resolution 2003-095 Page 2 Works. For all particulars as to the alignment of the Improvements and a full and detalled description of such improvements, referenced is hereby made to such plans and specifications. SECTION 4. Area of Special Benefit. In the opinion of this City Council, certain of the Improvements, namely the curb, gutter and sidewalks, will be of general benefit to properties located both within and outside the proposed Assessment District. The driveway aprons, however, will be of special benefit to the abutting and fionting properties. It is the intention of this City Council to make the expenses of the construction of such driveway aprons assessable upon such properties within the proposed boundaries of the Assessment District. For a general description of the Assessment District and area of special benefit, reference is made to the map of the boundaries of the Assessment District identified as "Proposed Boundaries of Assessment District No. 2002-1 (Quintard Street)". A copy of such map is on file in the office of the Director of Public Works and open to public inspection during normal office hours of such department. It is the further intention of this City Council that the cost of the construction of the Improvements representing the general benefit to be conferred by such Improvements shall be paid for by a contribution from the City. SECTION 5. Construction of the Improvements. This City Council hereby orders the Superintendent of Streets to cause the construction of the Improvements. The Superintendent of Streets shall first give notice pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27 to the owners of properties served by driveway aprons of their right to construct such driveway aprons and thereby avoid the levy of an assessment to finance such construction. Such notice shall specify that if the construction of such driveway aprons is not commenced within 60 days after such notice is given and diligently and without interruption prosecuted to completion, the Superintendent of Streets shall cause such construction to be done together with the construction of the remainder of the Improvements. SECTION 6. Authority for Construction. All of the construction proposed shall be done and carried through and financed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27. SECTION 7. Approval of the Report. The Report referred to herein above is adopted, passed upon, and preliminarily approved, and contains the following: A. A description of the Improvements to be constructed; B. The plans and specifications for the Improvements proposed to be constructed; C. The Assessment Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses Qf the const.".lct!on of the Improvem~nts and of·th~ L'1cidentd -expenses--in connection therewith contained in the Report. Such estimate shall include (a) that portion of such costs and expenses representing the general benefit to be conferred by such Improvements and (b) that portion of such costs and expenses representing the special benefit to be conferred by such the driveway aprons on those parcels within the Assessment District to be served by such driveway aprons; D. The diagram showing the Assessment District and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within such Assessment District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of this resolution, each of which subdivisions have been given a separate number upon such diagram, as contained in the Report; and E. The proposed assessment upon the several subdivisions of land in the Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be conferred on such subdivisions, respectively, by the driveway aprons to be constructed, and of the 5-9 Resolution 2003-095 Page 3 incidental expenses thereof, as contained in the Report if such driveway aprons are not constructed by such property owners. The Report shall stand as the Report of the Assessment Engineer for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings had pursuant to the Assessment Law. SECTION 8. Notice of Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing to consider protests to the proposed assessments is hereby scheduled to. be held at the City Council meeting room of the City of Chula Vista located at 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, Califomia on May 6, 2003 at 4:00 pm. As such public hearing, the City Council will hear and pass upon objections or protests, if any, which may be raised orally or in writing by any property owner or any other interested person. In addition, pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Law, each record owner of property proposed to be assessed has the right to submit an assessment ballot in favor of or in opposition to the proposed assessment. Assessment ballots will be mailed to the record owner of each parcel located within the Assessment District and subject to a proposed assessment. Each such owner may complete such assessment ballot and thereby indicate their support for or opposition to the proposed assessment. AIl such assessment ballots must be. received by the City Clerk at the following address at or before the time set for the close of the public hearing: City Clerk, City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue . Chula Vista, California 91910 An assessment ballot received after the close of the public hearing will not be tabulated even though the postmark on the envelope transmitting the assessment ballot is dated on or before the date of the public hearing. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council shall cause the final tabulation of the assessment ballots timely received. If a majority protest exists, the City Council shall not impose an assessment within the Assessment District. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the public hearing, assessment ballots submitted in opposition to the assessments within the Assessment District exceed the assessment ballots submitted in favor of such assessments. In tabulating the aSSêssment ballots, the assessmentballo"ts shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. SECTION 9. Order to Provide Notice. The City Qerk is hereby directed to mail or cause to be mailed notice of the public hearing and the adoption of this and of the filing of the Report, together with the assessment ballot materials, to the record owner of all real property proposed to be assessed. 5-10 Resolution 2003-095 Page 4 Presented by Approved as to fonn by ~~ 0-...- ~~ Ann Moore City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, Califomia, this 4th day of March, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Davis, Rindone, Salas, McCann and Padilla NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ATIEST: ..~~ lila, Mayor - ~,1.J. ~ J c:-.-- Susan Bigelow, City Cle~F STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHUrA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, Califomia, do hereby œ!iify that ih" foregoing Resolution No. 2003-095 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 4th day of March, 2003. Executed this 4th day of March, 2003. - tu.~3~ Susan Bigelow, City Clerk 5-11 RESOLUTION NO. 2003-096 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA TRANSFERRING $55,000 FROM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROrnCf DR-127 TO STL-285 (QUINTARD STREET) TO FINANCE PRECONSTRUCTION COSTS WHEREAS, the Quintard Street project consists of construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveway aprons, resurfacing and widening of the existing asphalt pavement, and installation of mailboxes and streetlights along Quintard Street between Third and Fourth Avenues; and WHEREAS, the total cost of this project is estimated to be $329,882, including $309,882 for design and construction and $20,000 for planning; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to transfer $55,000 in order to finance preconstruction costs such as planning, design and surveying; and WHEREAS, it is estimated that property owners will repay $67,976 of the cost of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of City of Chula Vista does hereby transfer $55,000 fiom Capital Improvement Project DR-127 (Drainage Improvements - Tobias Drive/ GIenhaven Way), to the new Capital Improvement Project STL-285 (Quintard Street) to finance preconstruction costs. Presented by Approved as to form by ~. ~ø::~ wanson En ring Director CA~ Ann Moore City Attorney 5-12 Resolution 2003-096 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 4th day of March, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: Counci1rnembers: Davis, Rindone, Salas, McCann and Padilla NAYS: Councilrnembers: None ABSENT: Councilrnembers: None ATTEST: ~-r£¡J1L ~ó-L.l~'KJ Susan Bigelow, City Clerk' r'J-----, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUN1Y OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF CHUrA VISTA ) ) ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2003-096 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 4th day of March, 2003. Executed this 4th day of March, 2003. .- ~~"'t~,;:> Susan Bigelow, City Clerk 5-13 RESOLUTION NO. 2003-178 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUIA VISTA DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABUlATION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2002-1 (QUINTARD STREET) AND MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 27 OF THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 AND ARTICLE XIIID OF THE CONSTI11JTION OF THE STATE OF CAIlFORNIA WHEREAS, the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of ChuIa Vista (the "City''), California, has received a petition from certain property owners requesting the installation of certain improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and street improvements and driveway aprons on Quintard Street between Third and Fourth Avenues (the ''Improvements''), together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, such improvements to be installed pursuant to the provisions and authority of Chapter 27 ("Chapter 27") of the ''Improvement Act of 1911", being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, this City Council, acting in response to such petition, initiated proceedings to order the installation of the driveway aprons included among the Improvements pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27 and to initiate proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27, Article XIllD of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (Chapter 27, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Law") to form an assessment district for the purpose of financing the cost of installation of such driveway aprons, such assessment district to be known and desiguated as Assessment District No. 2002-1 (Quintard Street) (the "Assessment District"); and WHEREAS, a report of the Assessment Engineer (the "Preliminary Assessment Engineer's Report''), required by the Assessment Law was previously presented, considered and preliminarily approved; and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Assessment Engineer's Report, as preliminarily approved, was prepared andccrnt&nedall the 'matters and iteììls callêd for pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Law, including the following: A. Plans and specifications of the driveway aprons; B. An estimate of the cost of the construction of the driveway aprons, including the cost of the incidental expenses, in connection therewith, including that portion of such costs and expenses representing the special benefit to be conferred by such driveway aprons on the parcels within the Assessment District; C. A diagram showing the Assessment District, which also shows the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within such Assessment District, with each of which subdivisions given a separate number upon such diagram; D. The proposed assessment of the assessable costs and expenses of the construction of the driveway aprons upon the several divisions of land in the Assessment District in 5-14 Resolution 2003-178 Page 2 proportion to the estimated special benefits to be conferred on such subdivisions, respectively, by such driveway aprons. Such assessment refers to such subdivisions upon such diagram by the respective numbers thereof; and E. A description of the Improvements including the driveway aprons. WHEREAS, notices of such hearing accompanied by assessment ballot materials were regularly mailed in the time, form and manner required by the Assessment Law and as evidenced by a certificate on file with the transcript of these proceedings, a full hearing has been given, and at this time all assessment ballots submitted pursuant to the Assessment Law have been tabulated, all in the manner provided by the Assessment Law; and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council determines that the assessment ballots received by the City in favor of the proposed assessment and weighted as required by the Assessment Law exceed the assessment ballots received in opposition to the assessment and similarly weighted and, therefore, a majority protest pursuant to the Assessment Law does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABUIATION. The assessment ballots submitted pursuant to the Assessment Law in favor of the proposed assessment and weighted as required by the Assessment Law exceed the assessment ballots submitted in opposition to such proposed assessment and similarly weighted and it is therefore determined that a majority protest pursuant to Assessment Law to the levy of the proposed assessments does not exist. SECTION 3. SPECIAL BENEFITS RECEIVED. Based upon the Preliminary Assessment Engineer's Report and the testimony and other evidence received at the public hearing, it is hereby determined that: A. All properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District to be assessed receive a special benefit from the driveway aprons; B. The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel proposed to be assessed has been determined in relationship to the entirely of the cost of constriiction bf the drivewaý aprorts; C. No assessment is proposed to be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit to be conferred on such parcel from the driveway aprons; D. Only special benefits have been assessed; and E. There are no parcels which are owned òr used by any agency as such term is defined in Article XIIID, the State of California or the United States that specially benefit from the driveway aprons. SECTION 4. FINAL ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT. Upon the completion of the construction of the driveway aprons, the Superintendent of Streets is ordered to prepare and fùe with this City Council a Final Assess~ent Engineer's Report that shall contain all of the 5-15 Resolution 2003-178 Page 3 information contained in the Preliminary Engineer's Report modified to reflect the actual cost of construction of the driveway aprons. SECTION S. NOTICE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION. Upon the completion of the construction of the driveway aprons and the preparation of the Final Assessment Engineer's Report, the Superintendent of Streets shall cause notice of the cost of the construction of the Driveway aprons to be given in the manner specified in Chapter 27. Such notice shall specify the time and place when this City Council will hear and pass upon the Final Assessment Engineer's Report, together with any protests or objections, if any, which may be raised by any property owner liable to be assessed for the cost of such construction and other interested persons. SECTION 6. PUBUC HEARING. At the time and place of the public hearing, this City Council will hear and pass upon the Final Assessment Engineer's Report, together with any protests or objections, if any, which may be raised by any property owner liable to be assessed for the cost of such construction and other interested persons. Upon the conclusion of such public hearing, this City Council may make such revision, corrections or modifications in the Final Engineer's Report as it may deem just; provided, however, this City Council may not increase the assessment proposed to be levied on any parcel above the amount proposed in the Preliminary Assessm,ent Engineer's Report (the ''Preliminary Assessment') without first providing the opportunity for the owner or owners of any parcel for which the assessment is proposed to be increased to express such owner or owners support for or opposition to such increase in assessment through an assessment ballot proceeding undertaken pursuant to the Assessment Law. No Preliminary Assessments may be increased if, following such assessment ballot proceeding, this City Council determines that a majority protest to such increase is found to exist. ' Presented by Approved as to form by ~·Cl. -S~~ wanson Engi eering Director G~ Ann Moore City Attorney 5-16 Resolution 2003-178 Page 4 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, Califomia, this 6th day of May, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: CounciImembers: Davis, Rindone, Salas, McCann and Padilla NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ATIEST: (~I.l J (¡ J. r;::;~·; ';(, ~ OJ--- Susan Bigelow, City Clerk> STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2003-178 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 6th day of May, 2003. Executed this 6th day of May, 2003. ~ -. ...r~~_ "c) ~..1 ~r... ~.I "Yo \l~ Susan Bigelow, City Clerk b 5-17 RESOLUTION NO. 2003-179 RESOLUfION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRANSFERRING $174,882 FROM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECf STL-267 AND $100,000 FROM DR-127 TO STL-285 (QUINTARD STREE1) TO FINANCE CONSTRUCTION COSTS WHEREAS, on March 4, 2003 the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2003-093, 2003-094, 2003-095 and 2003-096 which accept the petition, approve the proposed boundary map and preliminary Assessment Engineer's Report, appropriated $55,000 to finance preconstruction costs; and WHEREAS, this City Council, acting in response to such petition, initiated proceedings to order the installation of the driveway aprons included among the Improvements pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27 and to initiate proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (Chapter 27, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Law'') to form an assessment district for the purpose of financing the cost of installation of such driveway aprons, such assessment district to be known and designated as Assessment District No. 2002-1 (Quintard Street) (the "Assessment District''); and WHEREAS, notices of such hearing accompanied by assessment ballot materials were regularly mailed in the time, form and manner required by the Assessment Law and as evidenced by a certificate on file with the transcript of these proceedings, a full hearing has been given, and at this time all assessment ballots submitted pursuant to the Assessment Law have been tabulated, all in the manner provided by the Assessment Law; and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council determines that the assessment ballots received by the City in favor of the proposed assessment and weighted as required by the Assessment Law exceed the assessment ballots received in opposition to the assessment and similarly weighted and, therefore, a majority protest pursuant to the Assessment Law does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that t.':.e City CGu..-:cil of the City of Chu1a Vista does hereby approve the resolutions making findings at the public hearing pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act 1911 ("the Block Act'') and transferring $274,882 to STL-285 to fmance construction costs. Presented by Approved as to form by .~ß~~Áf1l>~ ~Šwanson Engineering Director 0-7lJv&c~ Ann Moore City Attorney 5-18 Resolution 2003-179 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, Califomia, this 6th day of May, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Davis, Rindone, Salas, McCann and Padilla NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None A1TEST: &~ -2:::=>ù.J ILs. -I.~v"j-,»---- Susan Bigelow, City Clerß STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUN1Y OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHUIA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2003-179 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 6th day of May, 2003. Executed this 6th day of May, 2003. ~,--==Mt.J...l ILl ~ 'V..1...0,.,.} Susan Bigelow, City Clerk l) 5-19 . RESOLUTION NO. 2003-305 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUIA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACf FOR THE QUINTARD STREET IMPROVEMENTS, BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND THIRD AVENUE IN THE CITY OF CHUIA VISTA (pROJECI' STL-285), AND TRANSFERRING FUNDS FOR PROmCf CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, on Wednesday, Iune 11, 2003, the Director of Engineering received the folowing eleven sealed bids for the Ouintard Street improvements, between Orange Avenue and TIúrd Avenue in Chula Vista (Project STI.-285): CONTRACfOR 1. Star Paving, Inc., San Diego, California 2. Scheidel Contracting & Engineering, Inc. La Mesa, CA 3. MJ.C. Construction, Chula Vista, CA 4. HTA Construction, La Mesa, CA 5. SRM Contracting & Paving, San Diego, CA. 6. I.D. Paving, Inc., San Marcos, CA 7. Heffler Company, Inc., National City, CA 8. ABC Construction Co., Inc. San DieBo, CA 9. Hanson SJH Construction, San Diego, CA 10. Tri-Group Construction, Poway, CA 11. T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc. San Diego, CA . BID AMOUNT $206,291.50 $229,376.25 $233,654.00 $246,865.00 $249,409.50 $262,543.38 $265,612.15 $273,942.92 $281,820.07 $308,172.00 $452,833.16 WHEREAS, the total low bid from Star Paving, Inc., is $49,488.50 (19%) below the Er.gineer's estimate of $255,780.00; and WHEREAS, Engineering staff checked the references that the contractor submitted and their work has been satisfactory; and WHEREAS, Star Paving, Inc. has also completed several Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects for the City with satisfactory results; and WHEREAS, staff has review~ the low bid and is recommending awarding a $206,291.50 contract to Star Paving, Inc. of San Diego, California; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 1 categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State 5-20 Resolution 2003-305 Page 2 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; thus, no further environmental review is necessary; and WHEREAS, the contractors bidding this project were not required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under this project. No special minority or women-owned business requirements were necessary as part of the bid documents. However, the "Notice to Contractors" was sent to various trade publications in order to encourage disadvantaged businesses to bid on the project; and WHEREAS, funding for this project includes $155,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, which stipulates prevailing wade construction labor; and WHEREAS, $35,738 in CDBG funds have already been expended to date for allowable staff and design costs related to the Quintard Street project; and WHEREAS, to avoid the expense and delay of having to re-bid the project with a prevailing wage requirement, staff suggests that the CDBG funds from the Quintard Street project (STL-285) be transferred to another project (STM-354) and replaced with Residential Construction Tax funds (ReI) transferred from that project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of City of Chula Vista does hereby a=pt the bids and award the contract in the amount of $206,291.50 to Star Paving, Inc. of San Diego, California for the Quintard Street improvements, between Orange Avenue and Third Avenue in the City of Chula Vista (project STL-285); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $119,262 in RCf funds shall be transferred from the North Broadway Basin Reconstruction project (STM-354) into project STL-285; and $119,262 CDBG funds shall be transferred from project STL-285 into the North Broadway Basin Reconstruction project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized to execute said contract on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by ~~~ Engt~;~~~f~or CÀ ~9--. SL Ann Moore City Attorney 5-21 Resolution 2003-305 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 22nd day of July, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Davis, McCann, Rindone, Salas and Padilla NAYS: ABSENT: Councilmembers: None Councilmembers: None ~JR A':TEST: 1\.1frJ< -'" ¿ rfofrJw£ Donna Norris, Assis~: City Clerk S':"'ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2003-305 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 22nd day of July, 2003. Executed this 22nd day of July, 2003. j.J4,. a... JÇMM'.I Donna Norris, A~l;~t City Clerk 5-22 RESO # 2003-305 PROJECT # STL-285 , THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED ON JUN 08, 2GOlt DOCUMENT NUNBER 2004-053413B liÆGOf:'I J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER ;"of," prc"I' l'OUlrl" RE·CtJ"Dm',. '''FIcr OHn ,Ht_UJ w ·,.r L K 1:.1'. \) Ur -c... TIME: 12:48 Pri WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Chula Vista City Clerk 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is OWNER or agent of the OWNER of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described, 2. The FULL NAME of the OWNER is The City of Chula Vista 3. The FULL ADDRESSS of the OWNER is 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 4. The NATURE OF THE INTEREST or ESTATE of the undersigned is: In fee, '[NFEE' (If other than fee, strike ~in. fee" and inserl. for ex.ample. "purc.haser under contract of purchase," or "lessee.") 5, The FULL NAMES and FULL ADDRESSES of ALL PERSONS, if any, WHO HOLD SUCH INTEREST or ESTATE with the undersigned as JOINT TENANTS or as TENANTS IN COMMON are: NAMES ADDRESSES NONE 6. The full names and full addresses of the predecessors in interest of the undersigned if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work of improvement herein referred to: NAMES ADDRESSES NONE 7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED June 2, 2004 8. The work of improvement completed is described as follows: Quintard Street Improvements from Orange Ave. to Third Ave. in the City of Chula Vista, CA 9. The NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR, if any, for such work of improvement is Star Paving 10. The street address of said property is Quintard Street from Orange Ave. to Third Ave. ithe City ofChula Vista, CA 11. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of CHULA VISTA, County of SAN DIEGO, State of Califonúa, and is described as follows: (continued on reverse side) 5-23 Form 1054 (1I94) Pa,ge I of2 REQUEST FOR NOTICE OF COMPLETION Date: ¡ ,." . /:;>''od :C1/(0.-- , To: , Senior Office Specialist Via: Munlthbert, Civil Engineer . &~ µELeJAEz- ! , . Public Works Inspector From: ~. ÇL>~M'Y;:.J S~ ß(r~(/£.«5V7T' ,. "c~ ~~ ,4-.1=:.'/0 ~2.J 4Æ /'µ ¡:-hE'. é!//7 ù=- Cfh'i./i4 ;::~4 S7L.· 2é3.s- RE: Project Name: Project No.: The above referenced project was completed on &> j ~y: ( Please prepare and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder. ~ ~(¡(l) //«Ioy Mlma Cuthbert (date) Civil Engineer The Notice of Completion was filed on: b'/Z/OY I 15ecJ>il. D-h--.vJ", Senior Office Specialist (H:HOME\ENGRIINSPEC1ìFORMSIREQUEST NOC.DOC) 5-24 Updated 5/27/2004 RESOLUTION NO.2004-395 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING FILING OF ENGINEER'S REPORT BY THE CITY ENGINEER ON THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION AND SETIING JANUARY 25, 2005 AT 6:00 P.M. AS THE DATE AND TIME OF A PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2002-01 (QUINTARD STREET) WHEREAS, on July 22, 2002, pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (the "Block Act") and Article XIIID of the Constitution of California ("Article XIIID"), Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-305 awarding a contract in the amount of $206,291.50 to Star Paving, Inc. of San Diego for the construction of sidewalk improvements on D Street between Third Avenue and Landis Avenue; and WHEREAS, on March 4,2003, Council adopted Resolutions 2003-093, 2003-094, and 2003-095; and WHEREAS, Resolution 2003-093 accepted a petition signed by the property owners along Quintard Street for the formation of an assessment district pursuant to the Block Act to finance the construction of missing sidewalk improvements along Quintard Street; and WHEREAS, Resolution 2003-094 approved the proposed district boundary map; and WHEREAS, Resolution 2003-095 declared the intent to form Assessment District No. 2002-1, ordered the installation of certain improvements on Quintard Street, approved the Preliminary Assessment Engineer's Report, set the public hearing for May 6, 2003, and ordered the initiation of Assessment Ballot proceedings; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2003, Council held a public hearing on the Quintard Street sidewalk improvements wherein Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-178 which ordered the installation of improvements in accordance with Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, on July 22, 2003, Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-305 awarding the contract for construction of sidewalk improvements on Quintard Street to Star Paving, Inc.; and WHEREAS, staff received a grant for Transportation Development Act (TDA) funding from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), which funds can only be used to finance the construction of sidewalks and design and advertising costs directly related to sidewalk construction; and WHEREAS, staff has completed the accounting of the expenditures and apportiomnent to property owners as shown in the Engineer's Report. This report amends the Preliminary Engineer's Report adopted by Council on March 4,2003; and WHEREAS, upon confirmation of the final assessments, property owners will have the option of paying any portion of the assessments during the 30-clay payoff period. 5-25 Resolution 2004-395 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept the filing of the Engineer's Report on the cost of construction, a copy of which will be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby set January 25, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California as the date and time for the public hearing on Assessment District 2002- I (Quintard Street). Presented by Approved as to form by ~~"1_, ~~ Ann Moore CityAttomey 5-26 Resolution 2004-395 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 14th day of December, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Castaneda, Davis, McCann, Rindone and Padilla NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: ATTEST: -=- ~,u.l· - ~'~ Susan Bigelow, MMC, City C erk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I, ~usan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-395 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 14th day of December, 2004. Executed this 14th day of December, 2004. 7".~&....... ~'V ,,~ ~ Susan Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk 5-27 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-396 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE DEFERRAL OF ASSESSMENTS AND ESTABLISHING THE RATE OF INTEREST AND FINANCING PERlOD APPLIED TO DEFERRALS FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2002-1 WHEREAS, on July 22, 2003, pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (the "Block Act") and Article XIIID of the Constitution ofCalifomÍa ("Article XTIID"), Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-305 awarding a contract in the amount of $206,291.50 to Star Paving, Inc. of San Diego for the construction of sidewalk improvements on Quintard Street between Third Avenue and Orange Avenue; and WHEREAS, the work is now complete and improvements have been accepted by the City Manager; and WHEREAS, the City funded a portion of the project cost to construct the sidewalks from a grant received fiom the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) under the Transportation Development Act (TDA); and WHEREAS, the remaining construction cost of $2,950 is to be assessed to the property owners; and WHEREAS, staff has completed the accounting of the expenditures and apportionment to property owners as shown in the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit "A"); and WHEREAS, the following amounts will be assessed to each property owner and are based only on construction costs for the driveway aprons: Address Parcel No. Preliminary Assessment Final Assessment 315 Quintard Street 623-050-13~00 $ 3,768.00 $2,667.50 325 Quintard Street 632-050-01-00 $ 3,928.00 $3,124.00 333 Quintard Street 623-040-09-00 $ 3,224.00 $2,304.50 341 Quintard Street 623-040-16-00 $ 5,764.00 $1,626.63 347 Quintard Street 623-040-06-00 $ 3,516.00 $2,596.00 353 Quintard Street 623-040-05-00 $ 3,352.00 $2,304.50 354 Quintard Street 619-290-55-00 $ 6,480.00 $4,545.75 357 Ouintard Street 623-040-03-00 $ 3,720.00 $2,836.63 360 Quintard Street 619-290-86-00 $ 5,944.00 $1,820.50 364 Quintard Street 619-290-87-00 $ 3,148.00 $2,208.25 365 Quintard Street 623 -040-02-00 $ 3,352.00 $2,527.25 366 Ouintard Street 619-290-52-00 $ 2,044.00 $1,432.75 369 Quintard Street 623-040-02-00 $ 3,864,00 $2,524.50 372 Quintard Street 619-290-51-00 $ 2,044.00 $1,432.75 374 Quintard Street 619-290-50-00 $ 3,352.00 $2,348.50 385 Quintard Street 623-040-01-00 $ 6,704.00 $1,028.50 5-28 Resolution 2004-396 Page 2 392 Quintard Street 619-290-49-00 $ 3,768.00 $2,838.00 TOTAL $67,972.00 $40,166.51 WHEREAS, upon confirmation of the final assessments, property owners will have the option of paying any portion of the assessments during the 30-day payoff period; and WHEREAS, if assessments are not fully paid during the 30-day payoff period, in accordance with section 5895 of the Streets and Highways Code, the City will charge interest at the rate of7% per annum for a period often years; and WHEREAS, property owners may pay the balance of their assessments at any time during the 30-day repayment period without penalty; and WHEREAS, this period will commence following recordation of the final district boundary map and when Notices of Assessment are mailed to property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the deferral of assessments and establishing the rate of interest and financing period applied to deferrals for Assessment District 2002-]. Presented by Approved as to form by CÀ.~~ Ann Moore CityAttorney 5-29 Resolution 2004-396 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 14th day of December, 2004. by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Castaneda, Davis, McCann, Rindone and Padilla NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None Cf2dL C. Padilla, Mayor ATTEST: ~iJ JÁ, '": -<.'~ ~w Susan Bigelow, MMC, City lerk .-J STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certifY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004·396 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 14th day of December, 2004. Executed this 14th day of December, 2004. - ~ -'1J...L6-U~~~ Susan Bigelow, MMC, City erk 5-30 ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBIT "A" QUINTARD STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 1911 ACT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD 2002-1 , AUGUST 2,2004 5-31 Back!!l'ound QUÙltard Street between Third and Fourth Avenues in ChuIa Vista is a residential street with an 80-foot width ofrigbt-of-way. It connects at a diagonal to Orange Avenue near its intersection to Fourth Avenue. The South ChuIa Vista Library is located at this intersection. Existing improvements generally consist of asphalt concre<te pavement with grave] shoulders. There are full street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewaJk) at 1388 EI Lugar Street (at Quintard Street) and adjacent to all properties on the north side of Quintard between El Lugar and Third Avenue. Additionally, two properties on the south side of Quintard Street, 317 Quintard and 1408 Third Avenue, have full improvements. In December 200] sixteen Quintard Street property owners submitted a petition to the City requesting the initiation of proceedings to fo= an assessment district in accordance with the Improvement Act of 1911. This district would finmce the construction of the missing curb, gutter md sidewalk md other street improvements on the north md south sides of Quintard Street. The City currently has a policy regarding participation in 19] 1 Block Act proceedings. According to this policy, the City will provide' all engineering, inspection, and administrative services at no cost to the property owners. It is the City's rosponsibility to relocate or replace all existing public improvements, which would be in conflict with the ,new improvements, including utilities. Additionally, due to the use of Quintard Street as an access road to the South Chula Vista. Library, the City has decided to pay for costs associated with construction of the additional shoulder and the curb, gutter and sidewalk. These costs would not be assessed to the property owners. 5-32 2 Overall Desil!Il and Cost Estimate The project area and general location of improvements are shown on the Assessment Diagram for Assessment District 2002-1. Quintard Street The properties, which wi1l benefit from these improvements and would be a part of the district are as follows: Address 315 Quintard Street 325 Quintard Street 333 Quintard Street 341 Quintard Street 347 Quintard Street 353 Quintard Street 354 Quintard Street 357 Quintard Street 360 Quintard Street 364 Quintard Street 365 Quintard Street 366 Quintard Street 369 Quintard Street 372 Quintard Street 374 Quintard Street 385 Quintard Street 392 Quintard Street Parcel Number 623-050-13-00 632-050-01-00 623 -040-09-00 623-040-16-00 623-040-06-00 623-040-05-00 619-290-55-00 623-040-03-00 619-290-86-00 619-290-87-00 623-040-02-00 619-290-52-00 623-040-02-00 619-290-51-00 619-290-50-00 623-040-01-00 619-290-49-00 The improvements included within this district consist of the reconstruction of the asphalt concrete pavement section, construction of monolithic curb, gutter and sidewalk, and installation of streetlights and new mailboxes. The five-foot wide sidewalk was constructed to match the existing sidewalk at the intersection of Quintard Street and Orange Avenue. Where driveways were located, a driveway apron was constructed to provide a transition between the street, the sidewalk and the driveways. In addition to the street and sidewalk improvements, the City had coordinated with the utility companies for the underground relocation of all overhead utilities along Quintard Street. This work was conducted prior to the construction of street improvements. The total estimated construction cost was $239,882, including the City's share. The lowest bid for this project was $206,291.50, as shown on Table 1. The amount allocated to the property owners was estimated at $67,976, which included only the cost of constructing the driveway aprons. 5-33 3 Method of Apportionment Costs must be apportioned to each property in proportion to the benefit received by that property. In apportioning the cost of street improvements, it can generally be assumed that the property adj acent to the improvements will receive the direct benefit. The adj acent properties would be most likely to use the improvements, particularly with respect to the driveway aprons. Additionally, construction of street and sidewalk improvements generally results in increased property values for the adjacent residences. For this project, the City agreed that the sidewalks and street improvements should be financed by the City due to the use of the street and sidewalk as a general public route to the South Chula Vista Library. It is generally the City's policy to pay for replacement of existing improvements and City staff costs related to planning, design, surveying and construction inspection. Therefore, the only cost that was to be paid by the property OWIlers is the cost of constructing ¢.e driveway aprons. This is Item #5 on the cost estimate, 6" PCC Driveways, and has a total estimated cost of$67,976. Only those properties, which would benefit ftom the new driveway aprons ftonting Quintard Street were included in the assessment district. Thus 398 Quintard Street, wI:rich has direct access to Fourth Avenue, was excluded. Similarly, 394 and 396 Quintard Street were excluded from the district because field inspections indiCated that these residents were crossing a gravel area adj acent to Orange Avenue. The cost for driveways used by two properties was split between these properties. The most unusual situation pertains to the property at 364 Quintard (APN 619-290-87-00), which does not fiont Quintard Street. However, access to this parcel is provided by a long driveway to the west side of the property at 360 Quintard (APN 619-290-86-00). Therefore, a portion of the driveway apron at this location was allocated to 364 Quintard based on the width of the asphalt driveway. The breakdown of construction costs among the seventeen properties within the district is shown on Table 2. For each property, the square footage of driveway apron was individually calculated. The calculation was broken into two parts: the actual driveway and the wing area on each side of the driveway, which provides a transition between the driveway and the sidewalk. 5-34 4 Tho aznounts to be assessed to the property owners based on the final CODStruction costs can thus be compared to the amounts estixnated in tho Pre1irn;,,"ry Engineer's Report as follows: Address 315 Quintard Street 325 Quintard Street 333 Quintard Street 341 Quintard Street 347 Quintard Street 353 Quintard Street 354 Quintard Street 357 Quintard Street 360 Quintard Street 364 Quintard Street 365 Quintard Street 366 Quintard Street 369 Quintard Strcet 372 Quintard Strcet 374 Quintard Strcet 385 Quintard Street 392 Quintard Street TOTAL Parcel N"",¡'t¡!' 623-050-13-00 632-050-01-00 623-040-09-00 623-040-16-00 623-040-06-00 623-040-05-00 619-290-55-00 623-040-03-00 619-290-86-00 619-290-87-00 623-040-02-00 619-290-52-00 623-040-02-00 619-290·51-00 619-290-50-00 623-040-01-00 619-290-49-00 Pre linnn!l'P'V Assessment $3,768.00 $3,928.00 $3,224.00 $5,764.00 $3,516.00 $3,352.00 $6,480'.00 $3,720.00 $5,944.00 $3,148.00 $3,352.00 $2,044.00 $3,864.00 $2,044.00 $3,352.00 $6,704.00 $3.768.00 $67,972.00 Final Åsses.'tmfl!'nt 52,667.50 $3,124.00 $2,304.50 $4,019.13 52,596.00 52,304.50 $4,545.75 52,836.63 $4,169.00 $2,208.25 $2,527.25 $2,044.00 $2,524.50 $1,432.75 53,352.00 51,903.00 $2.838.49 547.396.7S The Preliminary Assessment amounts were included on the ballots submitted to the property owners and tallied in accordance with Article XITID of. the California Constitution. Since the Final Assessment amounts are all equal to or lower than the Preliminary Assessment amounts, no additional ballot process is necessary. 5-35 s RESOLUTION NO. 2005-026 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT ON THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2002-1 (QUINTARD STREET) WHEREAS, this City Council of the City of Chula Vista (the "City"), Califomia, previously received a petition from certain property owners requesting the installation of certain sidewalk improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, such improvements to be installed pursuant to the provisions and authority of Chapter 27 ("Chapter 27") of the "Improvement Act of 1911", being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, this City Council, acting in response to such petition, initiated proceedings to order the installation of such sidewalk improvements pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27 and to initiate proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (Chapter 27, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Law") to form an assessment district for the purpose of financing the cost of installation of such sidewalk improvements, such assessment district to be known and designated as Assessment District No. 2002-1 (Quintard Street) (the "Assessment District"); and WHEREAS, the construction of the improvements has been completed and the improvements have been accepted by the City; and WHEREAS, a report specitying the work that has been done, the cost of construction, a , description of the real property specially benefiting from the improvements and the assessment proposed to be levied against each lot or parcel specially benefiting fiom the improvements (the "Engineer's Report") has been prepared by the Assessment Engineer and filed with and accepted by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public heating at which the City Council heard and passed upon the Engineer's Report, together with any protests or objections raised by any property owner liable to be assessed for the cost of such construction and other interested persons; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to confirm the Engineer's Report as submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. RECITALS. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. CONFIRMATION OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT. The City Council hereby confirms the Engineer's Report as submitted. 5-36 Resolution 2005-026 Page 2 Presented by Approved as to form by J'~ ooy Genera rvices Director c^'~~ Ann Moore City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City ofChula Vista, California, this 25'" day of January, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: CouncHmembers: Castaneda, Davis, McCann, Rindone and Padilla NAYS: Councilmembers; None ABSENT: Councilmembers: ATTEST: _ ~ 11 6..~ í --r'~ ~ .0 Susan Bigelow, MMC, City erk STATE OF CAI-IFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-026 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 25th day of January, 2005. Executed this 25th day of January, 2005. "5:¡ r ~~ ( - ) 1.1~1~ ~ Susan Bigelow, MMC, City Cler 5-37 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-027 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ASSESSING THE COSTS OF CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVE?vŒNTS ON PROPERTIES WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2002-1 (QUINTARD STREET) AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF LIEN WHEREAS, this City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Chula Vista (the "City"), California, initiated proceedings to order and did order the installation of certain sidewalk improvements pursuant to the provisions of pursuant to the provisions and authority of Chapter 27 ("Chapter 27") of the "Improvement Act of 1911", being Division 7 of the S1reets and Highways Code of the State of California and did also initiate proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 27, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (Chapter 27, Article xnID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Law") to form an assessment district for the purpose of fInancing the cost of installation of such sidewalk improvements, such assessment district to be known and designated as Assessment District No. 2002-1 (Quintard Street) (the "Assessment District"); and WHEREAS, the construction of the improvements has been completed and the improvements have been accepted by the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has confirmed the report specifYing the work that has been done, the cost of construction, a description of the real property specially benefiting fiom the improvements and the assessment proposed to be levied against each lot or parcel specially benefiting fiom the improvements (the "Engineer's Report''); and WHEREAS, as authorized by Chapter 27, the City Council now desires to assess the cost of construction of the sidewalk improvements against the parcels of property specially benefiting fiom such improvements; and WHEREAS, as further authorized by Chapter 27, the City Council has previously adopted Resolution No. 2003-298 (the "Resolution Authorizing Deferral") to authorize the deferral of the payment of the assessments to enable the property owners to pay such assessments in annual installments over a period of ten years with interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of five percent (5%) per year; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to confirm the deferral of the payment of the assessments pursuant to the Resolution Authorizing Deferral. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 3. CONFIRMATION OF DEFERRAL OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT. Pursuant to the Resolution Authorizing Deferral, the immediate payment of the assessments shall be deferred and the assessments shall be payable annual installments over a period of ten (10) years and the unpaid balance of such assessments shall bear interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per year. 5-38 Resolution 2005-027 Page 2 SECTION 4. NOTICE OF LIEN. The Street Superintendent is hereby ordered to cause the recordation of a Notice of Lien against the parcels assessed as provided for in Streets and Highways Code Section 5891. Presented by Approved as to form by ~~ nffin Gè al Services Duector CA~ Ann Moore City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 25th day of January, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Castaneda, Davis, McCann. Rindone and Padilla NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ATTEST: lLL ðw- (~. J If) --' Susan Bigelow, MMC, City C&r:k STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-027 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 25th day of January, 2005. Executed this 25th day of January, 2005. -iLL tt.0 ~ Susan Bigelow, MMC, City C erk 5-39 ATTACHMENT B 5-40 ENGINEER'S REPORT QUINTARD STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 1911 ACT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD 2002·1 JANUARY 13,2005 5-41 Quintard Street Assessment District AD 2002-1 January 13, 2005 Backe:round Quintard Street between Third and Fourth Avenues in Chula Vista is a residential street with an 80-foot width of right-of-way. It connects at a diagonal to Orange Avenue near its intersection to Fourth Avenue. The South Chula Vista Library is located at this intersection. Existing improvements generally consist of asphalt concrete pavement with gravel shoulders. There are full street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) at 1388 El Lugar Street (at Quintard Street) and adjacent to all properties on the north side of Quintard between El Lugar and Third Avenue. Additionally, two properties on the south side of Quintard Street, 317 Quintard and 1408 Third Avenue, have full improvements. In December 2001 sixteen Quintard Street property owners submitted a petition to the City requesting the initiation of proceedings to form an assessment district in accordance with the Improvement Act of 1911. This district would fmance the construction of the missing curb, gutter and sidewalk and other street improvements on the north and south sides of Quintard Street. The City currently has a policy regarding participation in 1911 Block Act proceedings. According to this policy, the City will provide all engineering, inspection, and administrative services at no cost to the property owners. It is the City's responsibility to relocate or replace all existing public improvements, which would be in conflict with the new improvements, including utilities. Additionally, due to the use of Quintard Street as an access road to the South Chula Vista Library, the City has decided to pay for costs associated with construction of the additional shoulder and the curb, gutter and sidewalk. These costs would not be assessed to the property owners. 2 5-42 Quintard Street Assessment District AD 2002-1 January 13, 2005 Overall Desi!!n and Cost Estimate The project area and general location of improvements are shown on the Assessment Diagram for Assessment District 2002-1, Quintard Street. The properties, which will benefit fiom these improvements and would be a part of the district are as follows: Address 315 Quintard Street 325 Quintard Street 333 Quintard Street 341 Quintard Street 347 Quintard Street 353 Quintard Street 354 Quintard Street 357 Quintard Street 360 Quintard Street 364 Quintard Street 365 Quintard Street 366 Quintard Street 369 Quintard Street 372 Quintard Street 374 Quintard Street 385 Quintard Street 392 Quintard Street Parcel Number 623-050-13-00 632-050-01-00 623-040-09-00 623-040-16-00 623-040-06-00 623-040-05-00 619-290-55-00 623-040-03-00 619-290-86-00 619-290-87-00 623-040-02-00 619-290-52-00 623-040-02-00 619-290-51-00 619-290-50-00 623-040-01-00 619-290-49-00 The improvements included within this district consist of the reconstruction of the asphalt concrete pavement section, construction of monolithic curb, gutter and sidewalk, and installation of streetlights and new mailboxes. The five-foot wide sidewalk was constructed to match the existing sidewalk at the intersection of Quintard Street and Orange Avenue. Where driveways were located, a driveway apron was constructed to provide a transition between the street, the sidewalk and the driveways. In addition to the street and sidewalk improvements, the City had coordinated with the utility companies for the ùndergroÙlld relocation of alt overhead utilities along Quintard Street. This work was conducted prior to the construction of street improvements. The total estimated construction cost was $239,882, including the City's share. The lowest bid for this project was $206,291.50, as shown on Table 1. The amount allocated to the property owners was estimated at $67,976, which included only the cost of constructing the driveway aprons. 3 5-43 . ..-_.--_.--------- ---_._---~- Quintard Street Assessment District AD 2002-1 January 13, 2005 Method of Apportionment Costs must be apportioned to each property in proportion to the benefit received by that property. In apportioning the cost of street improvements, it can generally be assumed that the property adjacent to the improvements will receive the direct benefit. The adjacent properties would be most likely to use the improvements, particularly with respect to the driveway aprons. Additionally, construction of street and sidewalk improvements generally results in increased property values for the adj acent residences. For this project, the City agreed that the sidewalks and street improvements should be financed by the City due to the use of the street and sidewalk as a general public route to the South Chula Vista Library. It is generally the City's policy to pay for replacement of existing improvements and City staff costs related to planning, design, surveying and construction inspection. Therefore, the only cost that was to be paid by the property owners is the cost of constructing the driveway aprons. This is Item #5 on the cost estimate, 6" PCC Driveways, and has a total estimated cost of$67,976. Only those properties, which would benefit fiom the new driveway aprons fionting Quintard Street were included in the assessment district. Thus 398 Quintard Street, which has direct access to Fourth Avenue, was excluded. Similarly, 394 and 396 Quintard Street were excluded fiom the district because field inspections indicated that these residents were crossing a gravel area adj acent to Orange Avenue. The cost for driveways used by two properties was split between these properties. The most unusual situation pertains to the property at 364 Quintard (APN 619-290-87-00), which does not fiont Quintard Street. However, access to this parcel is provided by a long driveway to the west side of the property at 360 Quintard (APN 619-290-86-00). Therefore, a portion of the driveway apron at this location was allocated to 364 Quintard based on the width ofthe asphalt driveway. The breakdown of construction costs among the seventeen properties within the district is shown on Table 2. For each property, the square footage of driveway apron was individually calculated. The calculation was broken into two parts: the actual driveway and the wing area on each side of the driveway, which provides a transition between the driveway anù the siùewalk. 4 5-44 '. Quintard Street Assessment District AD 2002-1 January 13, 2005 The amounts to be assessed to the property owners based on the final construction costs can thus be compared to the amounts estimated in the Preliminary Engineer's Report as follows: Address 315 Quintard Street 325 Quintard Street 333 Quintard Street 341 Quintard Street 347 Quintard Street 353 Quintard Street 354 Quintard Street 357 Quintard Street 360 Quintard Street 364 Quintard Street 365 Quintard Street 366 Quintard Street 369 Quintard Street 372 Quintard Street 374 Quintard Street 385 Quintard Street 392 Quintard Street TOTAL Parcel Number 623-050-13-00 632-050-01-00 623-040-09-00 623-040-16-00 623-040-06-00 623-040-05-00 619-290-55-00 623-040-03-00 619-290-86-00 619-290-87-00 623-040-02-00 619-290-52-00 623-040-02-00 619-290-51-00 619-290-50-00 623-040-01-00 619-290-49-00 Preliminary Assessment $3,768.00 $3,928.00 $3,224.00 $5,764.00 $3,516.00 $3,352.00 $6,480.00 $3,720.00 $5,944.00 $3,148.00 $3,352.00 $2,044.00 $3,864.00 $2,044.00 $3,352.00 $6,704.00 $3.768.00 $67,972.00 Final Assessment $2,667.50 $3,124.00 $2,304.50 $1,626.63 $2,596.00 $2,304.50 $4,545.75 $2,836.63 $4,260.25 $2,208.25 $2,527.25 $1,432.75 $2,524.50 $1,432.75 $2,348.50 $1,028.50 $2.838.00 $42,606.26 The Preliminary Assessment amounts were included on the ballots submitted to the property owners and tallied in accordance with Article XIIID of the Califomia Constitution. Since the Final Assessment amounts are all equal to or lower than the Preliminary Assessment amounts, no additional ballot process is necessary. 5 5-45 U 500 10 It1;QI') ~ ~. 0;;;; S2 d Ii.: 2 ~ N.,...;:: zO øa.~::g~ Q i§~~ .. "' Q. . " ;¡ .- ¡ .:ëj :I"';:; ~ 0 ~ " ~i';~~li ;itloiJJditli >- ~ :. ~ :. " ~ '" c . " ¡¡; ;; M ~ " ;Õ 0 " w . '" '" :;: " w 5 '"', " " "' :I: w " U :0 .. '" 0 ¡¡: ¡: ¡:; I ~I j!ggggg;gg ~ _ijg g ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 (II (I (II (I (J (I ,I ..1,00 ,... r.c . 0. w w w UJ W 1.1.1 c: ~ ..,olio' o' ri Ñ <Ii oj N :>- )- >- >- >- >- -:8 1= "'!i~ : ;t ~ ~ ~ ... ,JJ ~ ¡- i.5=: ;~ -~ ;0 0 ~.. .. ;.~~;r.J~ ~_ 08' §8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0. j ;'u ß· ., ~ - M ~ 8 , j,¡.o :¡ :I'-~' ~"8,o- -......... :;;: :~_. "- ":' "''':E'~;:i:!' ~ g $i; .~.,~~ }],jj ~;:iiu (¡ l" \]1; ,:~I' Oi ..o,¡;,Æ '..,.¢~. ~'~..._ ~~~~8.~~ ."''''',.o,ooN.æ 8 (I (I (I (II (I <IJ:C:'-"" ¡; ;¡.¡ <ï5 N po... W W W W w wlw~' 'ë ! N' ai ,..," ~- aî ISf n' >- >- >- >- >- >-'4 iij;...,,,, M,. M"':i'" léIIl";:- U....... ...... ,~..~ ¡ ---!Q-~' " ¡:S,,!Û' ,~8 g g _ .. "¡<9_,8 8 ~ ¡ -';' J:,l:~;tGS'LI1.Ia_::; !lI.uL~ .~ _ 'i':.-#i:,:,nj;-iJ·~ :;¡ ..oi'~I~llii.o>l'I~~"§'~ ~ ·!:I¡: 'J,~::~.ðî,¡g,· 8 g ~ ~ Nlri,;O ~I;t ~ I N g.8.~g.8~g V';;",_ :5 8 ~ ~ :g ::i § ~ f{1 ¡ø !ß If! ff]i _ ;;;.~. :;- ~. ~" ~ ~. ~ <lJ- ...... >= >- >- >- >-¡ÛIÞ·¡g'I- N M !"J ....., .. ,E:-~:' ,................ -'....-i'lll_ J~t;L· /t~_: '888885ì8 !i.~O"~·ŠÎ~f¡~~~~~~å Ju- .!t: ~ or "'. It '§o ..~ ~~ 'j3, i ;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : ,:-il~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' '¡¡¡¡!IO 0 0 0 ..,. r-.. 0 , -;...' 000 (0 ..,. 01 0 :-"'--,$' ~ ~ ~- ~- g" ~ ~ li.!!',JM"""'''''''M liII!'1'IE I,S, .Ë I:IIVi ,-c I.i.r ";;'1'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¡w - .Q'J' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I '~gggg~~g ! :~'.¡'o_ 0....,...,.... ¡:¡. j ~~~ ~ i -"" '''''''..J:: ¡ ~ :CI:! (/ c C Lr... U. 0 i ::J I...I.J ~ {3..J cri tTI ~; I Jln~ j 'r. " I, c . > 'e o ~ N"'OIO '11'. ~:-\'\I w ::> z w ",> 1-« 7.111 w" "z ~r2 00 "0 <Lz ~c(l(' I-W~ W::J~ Wz~ "wI- 1->"' "'« 00 "" «- I-'"' zl- Sdj Ow ~ W '" ~ u '5 :, . o " , .§ ~ ~ ! s ~ ~ ~ ! ~-~ ~=~ i Uj ë.... ~ :¡ I '_ ~I~ ~ ð I i~¡ ~ C) rJ 'g ª I' ! g¡ ii ~ r:c It) ro - '0 ~ Q,. 4J .. .., .::!: 'r"" -",1' ::I~ ß ! 0 ] t:!1 @ ð ~ ~ ~ II g¡:s ..ë: ~ , nlcol<~ac , I~ ~ ~ 11 u (.;) ~ j 0 ".ê..c cj (.;).J::! .~~ ]:11 2 ~ ¡L ~ 1"T1: N : : : '" : ; Z. i _ _ u . e- o. 5-46 g g g § ~ & ~ ~ 8 :3 ~ 81ii~ ~. ;; ~ 00 0 o Q 0 g g ~ . ~ N ...;¡ ~ 8 g "';0 M ~ .0 - N ~ ~ 00 00 U "'t:;i 8 8 o g ~. (0. ;:;¡:;; 8 0 8 gg 8 8 8 8. 8 88 0 ~ ~ d ~o 8 g ~ § ..; H N ~ ~ · · . ~, ~ N N. N .;~ ~N- M' ;; ¡;¡ ~ " ~ M ~ ;; ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 8 0 88 0 8 8 0 8 0 0 0 0, Q 0, 0 0 ~ ~ N gg d g Iii ~ ..; ~ ~ ~ ;¡ · ~ · ~ -,~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N~ ;; " " ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 gg 0 8 8 0 8 0 g 0 0 Q :8 Iii ~ OIZl d .; Iii ~ ~ d §. N ~: N 0 N N. . ~. M, . ~ 0 d ;; " ;; ..; ~- ..; ;; ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 0 00 8 0 8 0 8 8 g ~ q 0. 0 0 ~ Iii ..; 0_ 0; ~ ~ . ~ § 0 ;; NN ;; ::¡¡;; ;¡ ;¡ · N m~ ~. ..;~ ;; ;; ri ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g g 8 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0:0: 0 § 0 0 d ~ 0 ~ 0 0 8 0 § 0 ~ 0 ~ ~o M ø. 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0, N .N ~ ~ 0 0 ., 0 ~ ~ ~.c ~ ;; ~ M' .; ;; .' .' ~ M M ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 00 0, 0 0 0 0 ci 0 ci ci ~~ . '" ~ ci 8 · 0 ~ N ~ M No M ~ ;; ~ N ~~ ;; ~ ~O 0 ~ ..; ~ M' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u.:u.: u: u: LLctÎ criu.: u uU: u . . ' . .J.J .J .J .J.J .J-i w w~ W M o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ R · E " . -~ · . -" . CO '¡ij · . - E · , ,,~ ,gjii o . ß>= "'0 ~~ .~.-- ~ . _ 0 ~2 V),gj < ]j g "ii ..." ~ €.~ c ~ ti nI ovJ:! J::Qj:W ~~~ , 0 ~ .. u Q. · . ¡¡¡¡¡¡ "'" ~~ < < · . · . u u ,,; f: f. :> 1:: u.u. o...JilI ~.x .c. ~ j:J ~ ~ c c >-- "iv ïù . ~ ~ .2: U U ~ J::¡f 8 :EI~ . ~ ~ " MID go c ~ ~t12~ J:j:s:J:jò:j õ:tõõ c"O C c ~æ,g,g ~ '5 fl ô ~]~-i a:: 8 a:: a::: ~ o o¡¡ , Ig ] " ~ .~ ::::¡i: E 15 :.,u "dí3 . . _ 0 ~- ~~ .~ æ ð ~ ~ E = , , ~ 0.£ g ~ ¡;;þ 8,8 g ~ ~ ~ ~ 88 .,.;..,- ::¡;¡ 88 88 ggsici "Ll1ìJ')~ Ñ .... ~ ~ '2 ,0 õ . ~ " o "' " ° '" · . . , " 0 , . o 0 ;;i .~Æ I- :i1 ~ Oo.!!! I- ." ~~ , ~ "'" ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ;! ;0: ~ ~ :: ~ ~ I '- - ..,"... ..... - - - '" - .., ,.o, - .',_. ~o ID~ ~......~ ; ~ . o¡¡ ~ . '" .~ ~ .~ 8 .~ .~ .5 g ~ . .2 ~ .~ ~ £]~ .s: ~ïv ~... Õ :;; ~ go o c:¡:¡ ~ ~.~ .& c-¡¡¡~ Eël- ]~§]~'§ð o .2 :0= y GI U c ?: CD ~ oil ~ ~ .m 3: 3:.Q 0; > I!!] :!:!&!O~!-::E · ro o <ñ ~ o ro o '" ro " ,; a, · " ~ .~¡ ~I ri M N ~ · N ,; ¡:; ,,; N N ~ · ~ · N .' · ~ ~ ¡.... ~- ~ c o ~o8 :g.6~d(') N 'It ~ rn (,Q CD g u: ...J ~ CQ /'00 .... ~ot;;8~':ß-~ w c( N N Ç ) 1--'" If :J: >- ~ ~:æ '" . '" ~ CU æ;;.: I;') m " ~ 51 ~ ",,, >~ :So "'''' :I:i:i U" u.to cU: 1: ¡; t/ t/ t/ Ult/ VI WWWWWW >->->- >->- >- <g on 0 ~ CC 0 r--<D~a;lO ,¿ ai':; r-:...r §' <'1 0 "" 0 N .....r-r--NCC ...: <1:)' ai"¡ Ñ 1l'J- ~Z;:;:t~z:"" =; 8 '" ~ g ~ N ~ fflffH3ffJ >->->->- ~ ~ ~ ~ ë ,~ o o d o N ~ ggggggg dddgsia:id g88¡z¡~\;;8 O"Il')"!&J-c-,iö....: ..¡ "'''''''''''''1;')\1)_ --...-... fl,¡:,,, ,:-/ÆÎ; . ;5'1;§~ __. I "'!'ti!. :c.,'.iui:°8oooo8 w··· 1tII 0 0 0 0 0 ':810 <:) d d 0 = d :!it 8_ g_ ~ ¡:; ~ <4 ~ ",,';I ~ ~ ." -- ~ u;uj~êu..:u..:"fi :=i .J..J~~.Jr¡j~ ,j; . ~ IO~'" ....tñ~~ ~ ~.. d w '" z w "'> ....« j¡w ,," ~~ :¡?o <LC ~:¡:ß ....wN ~Ž~ ~~C/) "'« Co ~~ ....:J: z.... 5z oifj ~ w '" I i I I ~" - . · ~ · E " . -~ ~ ~ ;;-ffi .l:P ~ ~ 'E~ · . ~~ c . J'!~ "'0 :Ë~ co~ ::ï of _ c · 0 n: "'~ c Ðæð ..s -5 ,0 'g'3ii .... -5ii~ E c._ ::JE,g ...8<L is ~ £; . ¡¡ :..- U ~ IE ~ ~ ª~ '!~ ~ ~ i UI I'! ~ ~ II! "jj ê:....:2 QJ !õ ~ ~::; ~ r-.£ QJ 1\1 I: "¡ij i~ '0 ?ü 1D (II ~ '0 ~ a...2!:V _ .!!? (!).$ I'! =§ ~ 19 Q-g~e0_~.Ë "2 I'! r:: € 0C: '0 ~~8~8~æ > III =- ø . () .J:: ~5~.J::8~~~ Iò1 >< u¡ <.:! ~ :;) D::w<t Q..(DlL. I , I I . L~ ti . ë <L .-NM",,\lJ w 5-47 g g a . Q '" ;:!:; ~ aj.... <D ~ ~ 88::1 ..;..; C\Í r!:i "'M 1:i" 888 "g ~ ~ ~ ~ ri"':m" ;;........ 8 g ~ o ,¿ r¡j ~~;:; ~" ~ ~ 888 g g g ~ m ~ 0'''' 1'..: ~ ~ ~ 8 g g ~ ~ ~ ri~ ~ o o d >: ~ ~ o o d o ~ ..; - ~ u ,¡¡ M ~ :5 ~ '0 00 ~o ~ . - ~ ;;; 88 00 ~N ~- - ~ . uu. ¡J3.J o ~~ ~ ~ " .. ~ ~ .;:. i o jj, 0. ~ " .~ "E "'C _ -:. ::J'S IV E"g :Èi :J ª 8" Qjïij CD I!! ûj 0 èñ E 0) ..t:"'g .§ ~ [1 1/1 II) I/ ~ J:: ;B:~ ~ ;B Æ·Ëõ~õõ -~c-gcc æ.g~gg ~~ p~~ E -1!.... ~~~8&£ ~ ¡n :: ~ ~ ~~. ~ £: ~ 8 ~~~ ..:\"'i N" ~- ~ 8,!;;: ~ ;; ~ N ~ mM 2~ 88 8 ~ ~ g :-~ ~ ~~ ~ :5 g 8 ~ ~ Œi "':.....;:;; ;; 8 g 8 ,; 14 g ~~. ~ ~~ ~ 888 ,; ¡;¡ ~ :!S......... ;; gggg8 o (D' 0' cr:i ~ 1Q :; g ~ <C. ..... -z;;.....;;. o o d ~ N - ~ u . W 88 N.o ~~ u.:u: u.: u: .J..J.J ...1 ~o W~ " . 0 _ 0 - ~ o ~ m 0 N- Ñ ~ ~ ~ 8 ..: ~ ~ ~ 8 8 ,..¡ 0 o N M ~ ";Ið" ~ ~ 8. 8 ~ ~ ~;; 8 8 ~ g ~ ~ :;ti ~ a ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ .,; ;; ~ :; * ." u o . ~ ~ c ~ ::J !ij ].~ c: .S; ¡J ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~ .5 u.. ~új .¡: ~ ~ 'ö.!: û) 'O~c:rn... 8~g'5æ ~CQ§ð( ~ ~~ãi'lii¡g zzc:: a. 15 ~ 2: g ~a;j~z ~ w. ~ ~ ;:;;;;. ~ 0 ~ : ~;¡; 0;;;. 8 8 g 0 ~ ~ § § ...~~;x o 0 o 0 t"ig ;:¡ =. ;; g 8 8 g ~§§§ ... ('.f d N° ~ ~ ~ ~ 88 88 ,; ,; g g ~ C5 0..... Ñ o' ~ ~ ~ g g 8 8 00' d d ~ g 8.~_ .....1"). a;;. ~ ~g ~ . NO _0 o ..; ~ 00 00 §~ .,. ~ u.:cr.ifliu.: ..J.J.J.J o 0 N ~ ,; " 't ~ ~ o " ..;1 v ,5 . . o -.... g-e S8 u :; " ,- ~] ...." ~~ ~~~~ 8 ~ = w ~;; 88 §@ 0' ~ ~ ø '" '" ~ o '" . ~ '"Î '" . c ;¡ " . ~ . o 0 E g ¿ c ;;i .g¡g? 1- ~ 8 gc:~ ~~ o ~ ~ " ~ ~- '.' 1M' ..;1 ¡;:f;j I~I ., ~ì I = ~ .; ;-1 ~I g ~ .,; ~ ~ 00 0.0. §§ á~ Iâ ª 0; '" ... ci c.: z a . 0 . "- u .E c ~ :5 ~ '" ~I ~ N 0 ~ E ;;; ~ :s ~ "8 ~ e; ¡; ~~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ . :I: . ! ~ ~ :!~ ~.~ "1 Ii d- '~-:S I,l c Ii z11" :." ii_ . "',)\ 'i:i œ ß ;æ >- ~ '" ~ '" => iì en . 0 u ¡¡; ;; '" '" Q ;: 0 ~ w en ~ :;: u w "" ~ -' u => '" :r w '" " => u. ø 0 ¡¡: >- I- U .... II~ ~ ~. & 8 ;Q 25 ~ 'ª S -118 8 ~ ~ ~. ~. ~_ æ Iß æ ffJ æ w ti ... .:!o 1'1 <Þ- o· ø:¡" gj NO'" >- >- >- >- >- >- ;::I:;"" ...'"' ~ N ('oj N;X.... .oÞ" k.................. ~,,$ ~ .<3~I: ;,;<3 :5:58:58~8 - ,··æ -2§~;2~~ I~i" ~~ õ, ,~~" ;¡ A. W '" o< ¡5!:i! '1;. c....... "Ii" : 0 'I ,~ ::¡ '" r.c ~~~8~8:5 g!:J! "'_DIN_NO ¡r)u "'1J1U rJ)-"3~~:8·~~_:g_::::_ ~~~~~~¿~o ~~:;¡<D~;;:;5i!:£ O-~i" ...... .......... c .;, ~o -"" ¡¡«¡ ;2."ð :::: ~ ~ ~ ~ g 8 - III -< <ri"": Ñ cO ..: to N ~.. :~~~~'1~~~~~""~ .!! .'" .,,', ,ti.-i5iß·i':CJ !D.,.... ... IJ·..~ f.'I" ,"!i~<i:f¡f:~~..~¡: ::¡ ":2': , """1 \':'¡;<'I'II'~' Jsi::':'¡:':I:~!- ~ 1/1,'''''], ::t.òit,ø.~ .[ g ,,1¡8 :5 8 8 i'! ~ :5 ,$' oO~8~~~ [ß ro fiH3 ff] ffJl~ ~!I~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ri >->->->->->-_"OCONNNN..... :s:ik'" ... ... '" ... ... ... c~ ~~ ... E_~ ,:~ .,.'" ,i~'lib _~."."'''',,'',.,..ø,,:,:~.',,'i. ,::I':J:-:'·'i¡c; ~:. '.-'~ :I"r 1/1' ~6 --" W => Z w ~~ tfiw ,,'" ~~ ~o "-0 ~~:2 I-WN UJ::J~ WZI- "W"' 1-> "'<C 00 ~~ z,.. 5z ow W ~ W "' 1i . õ" .t 8888ffi~8 8$u:;~~;t:g cr11l}1o't1o'tM ,.... ~~ ~ 8888888 ¡-:3.!§, ~ ~ ~_~.~. ~ ~':'Åí;:?I$!. ~ ~ ~ g ~: ::::,1oi;._,..,......,.........,. i::~:~' 8 8 g g 8 8 8 ¡'Jggggg¡gg I .~, ~~......- ~ ~~ , ...; !. . III III . .L: '¡: ;It/.!t/.!§§~~~ !:i I!..J..J I-I-..J (f) W f r_:ã' l , ì I I I I I I i I I I I ·i........ I ')R..... ~vw ¡:'J.,:"'" 000 000 o IlÍ 0 N N N ~ ~ " g"';:( 8 8 ~ $ ~ :4 ø _ N~ ~ 8 :5 :5 8 ~ d <c.., ;n ...:'" ....' ~ ~ 8 is ~ § ~ :¡ N~ ~ 888 ~ g g ~ ~ . ~Ma g 8 8 ~gt:i N _ r;j~ o o g ~ g ~ 8 o o ~ M ~ ~ u . W ~ ø 0 VN .; M g 8 g IlÍ do M N N Z;~ ~ 8 8 ~ ~ d ~ ,....<:; ;:;; ~ 8 g 8: § ~ ~- ;;~;;; 8 ~ g g ~ <d 0.... ;;; ;¡ :5:;¡ :5 d ori N ~ v ~ ~ _ N .....: ~ ~ ~ 8'á! £. g ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 8 §! g g ~ o. ~ - ;; o o ¡;¡ N ~ 00 00 teic:i _0 wN -'" ~ o :5 o 0 ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ 0 o 0 r..: cr;í ~ N N ~ ....:....' ~ ~ 88 8 ~ dr..:d.... ... 0 N 0.., 0 en Ñ"": ..,·...i ............ 00 00 00 ~N - ~ ~ 00000 o 00 e e g N Il"i rri ~ N ..._ _ _ ~ u..:u.: u.: u.: -i.J....i .J ~ 0 w w ~, 8 O. M ~ ~;¡ 8 8 8 ~ N r..: §' ~ o ø ;;;..,. .... - '" ~~ ~ . uu. J'j....i ~ o o w 88 ði ~ M v ....:o,r,. ~~ 8 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ g ::t ¡a <D N.... "';;;~t:i ~:;: '" - 8 8 ~ ~ ~- ~ ß 8:: ið ~~~a ....: ai ~ ~ ~ 8. \;; 8 - ~ ....:..¡ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ g g.,;~g .... ~ cr1.... "':;~a ~ ~ 8 æ 8 ~ - ~ 8 8 ~ 8 ~1lÍ-.i-1lÍ ...~~a ....: N" ~ - ~ :5 88,8 . . § 0 00 0 ¡¡; 8 ,"I", -ri~;:;; ~ 800 g <.rio.~1t'Í ~ g 8, ¡¡ - '" M ~ ~ u.:c¡jl:riu.: -Ï....i....i-Ï ; ~ R,.........~ ~ oð .æ s !Ii L ~ H J ~i 0 i :'~íE- ~ ~;:~,Tt ~ ~ m :5 ~ I .;¡: E :;..... LI.. u. .5 C ~~ "E3 a.~~~;-;:I~(!) ! ~ 13 x ~ ~ -o:! "E>-[Q ~ ~ ~ § I] ~ :1!g. (/J lJ ~ .!!! s: ;::j.:; Q .ê.t:: .2 LL U) (/J .£ -g;5l me ¡:-g.Èj üU .~ ~ -g ~ 'E ~~Q Ult~ ;::j8e .t::.:::;;-"C~\~ (f) jj ¡:....:g GJ:::::¡.,¡ ....= 8 ;:1: ]~ïij I~ ~ ,,_, _ ~ Q U') ~ âj § (!).!9 Q) ¢: ~ ..!<: .t:: ~ ¡~I ~ w g¡ -g ª Q)'" ~ ~ 0 <') tD ,!:.!: ~ ro ri ¡ro - > tD ro ro '- ro (f) - CI - ~.... :¿ cb iQ~t:.Q '-¡~~Cñ-g .r:.]§_§§ B¡:::5 1..,- '"o~~$I~~ ~s $5å 'i; ·~.ê·~·~ ~~.~ I·~ (!) c ~I~I ~ c.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~.~ UJ.o:: W LU = uJ 1:Š"¡l¡ I- -gro¡: '.1: -fltDEõ~'õõ æ~Q.s(/J.$.e ro§8 ~o]-g·i1~æ ct:C:g 8]c:ro-88 - ~ ~12 ~2 ~ ~ ~ i! ~ ~ -5 ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ] ~ I ~ .ª ~ tJl E q ~ ~ ~ E:g .... ~ !11"2 GJ ( Q Q ai ~ (II I! ] a::Jj.:t:üa.(!)u.1J..8a.:\i~oc8a::oc zza::~o..l-""", i I I g, ,.... N « '<t 111 L_:_"'-. ___L._L E ø ." ~ · ci N ¡. ~ N · N ~ ..; ~ N ~ ~ ~ · ,,; ~ -';:-j !:¡ :;q ., ::1 N . N ~ .' ~ N ~ ~ ~ . ~. ¡: 8 :5 g g 00 rzjrzj M M ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ . . , ~~ .. .~ ] o .!!! ,;" ~~ , ~ !<!.- .. ~ <0 ~ ~ ~ ;:~ ~ ;': ~ ~ ;:: :; ;!! 1 --~~ . - -.. 5-48 . . ':Ii.: ~o . Ii' <L >- !1i '" ~ '" => '" . c u ¡¡; " ~ ~ '" fÓ 0 !!1 w . !!! ~ >~ :55 =>'" "'w u§ ..ø o~ ~ ¡¡ o .2 <n~88M ~81::~gQ ...J ........... ~ «J·LÖ~ (f. :::JOII')(Q eM N c.¡¡"'- '0 >- i ~ ;g':J I. j g-~ o ~ "_ 1æ;rL,~· '¡: Ò:..,!·l" ::z:. =,.!i:.:.'ii! ~ <tHü<æ. - I' -~ _~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ¡¡¡ ~L.J...r..oJ...I...I:3 3 Sii~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .IS S .~ ~.. ši¡ .~~ !~hrH ~I !';;J:~ ,:~:.! =~ , co. i.l?! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I",c. 0..... 01 01 N I,( .... 9...:....,'" m[gM CI ON ~ ~ æ ~ ~ [fj .5:7::1 ~ ~ _....:- ~ ~ .... ~ >- .... ,.. >- ,0' ~ C, N II) ~ ~ M ~ 10'> i"~"'-;;"'''''''''' ... rd:m . "'4':1. ~;:~: ~;?! ,:¡¡. ,~:~ ~j)'i;ti r~ ~ j .£" '>'!i~ll .,; N t~' '.~~,~~j¡~"I'~ ~g .~, '~'I~ ¡; ¡¡ :!';~:(~t " H.ft":if ¡""':". .'...'.'~' '';!II. CI)'i-(II,:~:;'~::J: ,is' '. I W :0 Z W ~~ ;:¡j~ ,," wZ >;2 00 ¡¡:c ~~:g "'wN w::)~ wz", "'w", "'> "'<: DO "'", <:- "'''' z>- 5z OW w ~ w '" ii . "2 <L CD CD CD i:Dû.i CD CD CD CD CD CD CD ~ ~" " "" ~ " " " " " " '" "" " ~ ~ ~ " " " " " " ~I < < < < < «<C<: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ -I I 1I 1I rJ II VJII WIJ.JWWI,1JW >- >- >- >- >- >- M..... 'f IC \D ....0.... (" N""; d m . (CNIl1..... ......... N ~ - N ~ ON~ ;:r; ~ ~ o- M' ~ ~ U æ (f 13 ~ä.?:i~.;. ~ ~ >- ~ ~ >- :1i;1~ i!'.~l"',' ~:-::r~ ¡¡¡,~ ,1~'9'" g 8 8 g g 8 g ... ... ~ ;0:0, 0 2 0 d ~ ,¿ 8' .'C '.~ 0 ð f'- roJ ~... :s . .>Z: u .'8'-~...,. w... ~ L" i;~:i: A ~..;;; ¡;¡ ll:·i;¡li_;~.:~ l:,i' :~ ~¡j'''h''~,¡:õ ' ! ~~~~â~~ ! \f! 0, 8.o.IC.:: :. 01. 0, ¡ QOI¡1~NOr--';t ~.!!....:;;;~~~~~ .. ~ II E.,!! ~ I ~ S!1 ~¡I:o 0 0 0 0 0 0 jUJ 1;;; 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ¡ 8,18 8 g g ¡ ~ 8 , :: O,O_1o'I-"'~ N I .~~;; ~ ! !~: !!0 0 § ,~ ~ ~ W~ , :J- ¡:.J.J ~ r- ~, ~! if L ~::! P-i~ I i¡ ~'" !I'~ I t ~ l I is ;;;;: 'g m £ ~ ~ Q ~ ¡·!ë .~ I ~~ &1 i 'I~ ~n ;;S I ,~u 1:' ~ ,. 1 .~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~! !!¡,; C/) ~ oX ...:> ~'S ¡ ~ I~ äE~ m¡ê I~"ê I ,I~IÉ il*~ ! H H I ·~'5~roro :!:ii5~ ~; I' l~c~ ~ ~~·"u: j ~ IS 19 5 ð i 15 :::: 1~"""Q ê~~(,J)(o~ r "g ~ c: .e.ë;::;:; ~ ij aJ E ·§8.c(::¡ccc: '3IÌ ro" "'00' ~ aI.!!..9! a. ' , >~:æ~ '~~~.s!w ~ ì -; ~ Gis <II ~ ~ Ë 'r: ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~JL~ð~~ææ8¡f~~ g 8 8 is :5 :5 8 8°8>igg¡j,; o N (D 0 <n Õ ~:2'o-Ñ~·~·~ .....aa..... 8 :5 g gog .8N m·"': roJ' ~~~ ~ 888 gg~ ~~... ~ 8 .,; o '" ;i oO o o .,; o '" ..; oO ~ u . w o N N.....mo ';t.i£....,._ N ~ ~ ~ 8 g ~ ¡o.,j I'i N o _ ~ - ~ N ~..~ ~ g ~ d"': r-: ~;¡; ~ ...~ ~ g 8 ~~ oO 00 00 tOO ~i<: oO.-' oO ~ 8 ex) ~ f:2 w. oO '" ~ ~ II"iwi N N .0 "':f'-' ~ ~ o N IIJ 0 "":QI...... (D ~ QI <Ø I'i N 8: RI g¡: ¡;£~~~ ~ :;: ~ ~ cil'i oi a~ ~ 88 g ~ ~ ~ ~;; ¡i 8 g 8 ,;~~ ~ ~ ~ ;; 8& '0 00 '" 0 N . "';: oO o o .,; '" N oO 00 00 NIti ;;;; o 0 o 0 ~ ¡q oO '" ~ ~ <Ø N ~~ ~¡;::eg ~iEii'i ;;; N-:;:·;; ~¡;; 00 00 g~ ~oO oO o o ~ oO u.:u.: ...i.J u.: u.: ...i .J 8 g cig ~ N "':ai ~ ~ 88 g 8 ª~~§ ;; ~ s~' ~ ~ .. u.. . .. w~ ii . LU ~o ~<o ; ~ 8 g wid ¡;¡~ ¡¡ 8 8 §~ S'" ~ o "'~ ~ ~ 8888 gg§~ 1¡10 _ , ~r"ja;; '" ~8a~ 1¡1 . 0 <0 N>=!OroJ ~ÕO... - o' M ~ oO u.:øtnu.: ...i.J.J.J ~.....-~ . i; 'r ~ o ~ ~ , ~ <f:' f æ ª~. "ð ~ ~ £ ~ :5 ~ n f!' ~ !f "E -I E c: c: ø ~ ~.~ 'g ~ ~ 0 ~ 66 ~ ti "0 ê ~ .c.c: :;~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~B ~ ! §1 I: I: :.:: f$ O ~ r:h ~g~] ~~~ Ig' ~ ttí :c:ùj Jj u. ~ ùj I:~ _ ~ ~~~~ ái~'O.siñg-e o !II 0 0 ~:Bg.fi1J88 53G~ ~CJ~odii~j .Q -g,g.2 ~ ~ -M ~ ¡; ~ ijj ~8~~ zza:OD..¡-.:E ¡ í (Î I Z I ,.......... - N M ~ ~ '. - -, -, ~ N . ------ -- -_.. 5-49 <om ;: ~ ~ . . ñj"ffi "'" "" . m ~~ ~~~~ - ~ .; ~ ~ N ~ g o .- :: .; !i 88 00 g 8 ~. ~' ~~ !. ~ I" o , ~ Ë ~ . ~-ª ïiiQi . u o .!!l ." ~~ o ~ ~ " ~ "..L ... ... ,; .:.: Z 0 . 00 If <ðQ ~~<"1 ~1!!~~E2 ...J Q (O~ f'... :: ¡¡;~~:gìD NN ~~ Ii '= .'0 ( ,.. ~ ~~ :J ~ '" . " ü m).: <"1 m !2 ~ @ ~ "'" >ß :35 ,,~ x"' u!Š "-~ ,,"- ~ ¡:; -f - ¡i I , ! ~w w w w w w w w w w ¡¡¡¡¡¡ w w w w w w w wi - - - - - ill! ]'3 ~ ~ ~ ~ => => => => 3 =>=> ~ => => => => => => =>1 w w w w w ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > > > > > >, o i< ~ < < < ~ < ~ < H ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -i~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ - ,)ä il .~~ ., ¡ II " IU; ~ ~ ill ill ill illl >: ,.. >- )- >- >-, ; I ;1 ¡" J~I¡ I'~i"~ Ji "~,! .~.,;a ,H-'i!..,~ ,i¡i:)' . I',~:~.!!;I~" g' 1<Ii ~'i'~'~i! ï ., f.'4.'" .:. J,¡¡¡'"I ll'!' 1I ,q :Æ,' ]1 $ l! :t: . . ~ ~ 8, 8 m m 0 - - :;¡ ~~ 8 ~ . 0 N _ 0 " I '" ~ m ~ ... . . '" ~ ~ ~... ¡¡¡ 0 ¡¡ ~ <ri ~ N :;j ,; '" ~.( ¡¡ ~ ,; ;ç ~ ~ìt .,; j; ;¡ ~ 8 N . 8 ~ ... 8 ~ - ~illill - ~! 0 N ... '" ~. . o. ~ N ~ ~ ~ 2' ,; M ~ <5 .; m' ~ ,;~ ~' :;;;; N :; ~ N å~ ",' > > í.+:ZlZl~ ;¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ;& J!' ." -~' ~ !;; ~ R. ~ ::: ~ - ~*~ ~~ci~ ~~. ~'. ð t!." 111::3.... \l1 N M ... N ·f~j:.._ '11, 8 ga............ 1õ!..,.¡!4!,....:,,~ - ;:::L, :t: ... "" ~.. ~I!! 'i'I ; : :~ ,~1'~11i'·1~1 ¡ I ~8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ! $I~§. êl ~ §. ~ ~ & ~ili2;!:~~:, !~\õ:, ~III - '''''......,...,. ""'.... l,Ë<~ J CAllie' Jjwl~IUHH~ 'I: 0 \l .. :~ .... .... ~~ w => Z W ~~ ~~ ~~ 00 ¡¡'o ~~:g f-WN W::J....J WZf- "'w"' f-> "'< 00 ~~ f-J: Zf- 5z ow ~ m ii . " .t ~ ~ ~ ~~ ¡j ~ '" N " 1i;;Ö <"i0l; '" -~ M ... " :! ¡g~ <ri ~~ 1;; 8 ....: ~~ N N. ~ -.¡:¡ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ri~ ¡;; ~ N .; ~ ~ ~ 0 8~ 0 00 8 8 §;~ 8 0 0 :5 ~ 0 0 00 ci 0 0 0 '0 :;¡ ~g . 8 8 g 0 g 0 >18 iD, 0 0 >1 .., 0'" 0.0. ~ ' N ON ~ ~ 1::;. a' ~ - ~ ~.c ~ ;; ~.., <no ~ 0 0 ~ ~ M M ;; ;; ~ ~ ~~ ~ j ~ Cf.! CI) § § U. lL ~ ~~...l...JI-I-..JIJ)UJ II 1- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡¡ I'! ~.. ! - . ,jl;~! H ¡: 5~ jlj 1,1 î J! I ~õ I ¡2 ~ ~ ~ ,g Qí 5 II n~:6~~æ ~~~ , ¡ 0 I' a.. IlJ .... '" ::1: "J .... 1,-, ¡.~Ø~I~~I~s ¡æð o "g ~I ~ CI ~ ~ -5 0 I -g "' C:I~ .e".E;; ~ j:e (Ø § 8 « ::J 0 c: nI ( J! ,~:æ=-g~0;..c:~UJ I . 0 ~ ;!! ..c: (J c5 .!!! .!!! C. 0 E ulõ '" . . E E E Õ Q xl ¡¡¡ 2 ~ ~ :;¡ :::I 8 ~ O:w<cUa..<au.u. a.. ;-ci. % 1._"-,,,.:...: .. .-N ""'It I,Q ~ ~ " - -.----. 5-50 o o o o ~ .; ~ ~g ~ . :;;§ .; ~ 88 c::ic::i ~N -~ ~ 8 a' ~ N ~ g:5 8 g ~ ~ ¿ :q ...,...,.... ...,. .¡¡ . W ~ . u"- & ..J .¡¡ . W u..:u: ..J.J u.: u.: .J ..J u.:uicr.iu.: .J.J.J.J ~ o ~ ~ ~ - 00 ~ 0 :; ~ o 0 N..........,. ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::J i:: c: "I#' lê~8B~~ ~:iÆ&t~ a..~~~·~·~I~U) € 'E ::Z:J g g I ct. dI 'tJ ~ ~ .~.~ 'g Q I:~ 0 ~~~66]~~li ~8~.I:.c:=5"O~æ@ 1~ ~ ~~ ~~B I ~ ~i iC1~ ~ §g~ ~ ~ 'i ·x.§·)(·x ææï'! .5 Ie ð ~ w 'i w w = W :s -I'=: aJËõ-oÕõ æj'õ.!;;C/JE-e ~æ 155515 "S'!u§ccë§8 a.. _:.=;:::::>:.= õ..Q '= ti w u ~fj¡ ~'3~fq :::aJNo( ~uJi ,....~£1JQ"g ~~õ->fE"O ~~~8~£ ZZ~UI~~~ o m ;: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ... -. .___._ ___n._ ...- -'-. 88 c.ri OM O~ .' ~ Ii ü . ~. . , .s. ~ §¡~ "m 1i D.!!! Ii." ~~ ,~ S " ~ , _....J RESOLUTION NO. 2005- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS ON THE COUNTY TAX ROLL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2002-1 (QUINTARD STREET) WHEREAS, on July 22,2003, pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of1911 (the "Block Act") and Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID"), Council awarded the construction contract to Star Paving, Inc., for the construction of sidewalk improvements on Quintard Street between Third Avenue and Orange Avenue; and WHEREAS, the work is now complete and improvements have been accepted by the City Manager; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004, Resolution 2004-395 was adopted to accept filing of the Engineer's Report on the cost of construction and to set the public hearing on the assessments and Resolution 2004-396 was also adopted to approve the deferral of the payment of assessments and to establish the rate of interest payable on the unpaid balance of such assessments and financing period; and WHEREAS, on January 25,2005, Council adopted Resolutions 2005-026 and 2005-027, which confirmed the Engineer's Report on the cost of construction of certain public improvements in Assessment District 2002-1 (Quintard Street), assessed the cost of construction, and ordered recordation of a Notice of Lien NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City ofChula Vista hereby authorize the collection of assessments on the County tax roll for the construction of certain public improvements in Assessment District 2002-1 (Quintard Street). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assessment shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subj ect to all penalties, procedures, sale and lien priorities allowed by law. Presented by Approved as to form by vc.........f.,! - Jack Griffm Director of General Services Ann Moore City Attorney J:\attorney\Reso\Finance\Assessment Dist 2002~ 1 1 5-51 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item: 4> Meeting Date: 04/05/2005 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving the agreement between the City of Chula Vista and The YMCA of San Diego County South Bay Branch for the provision of after-school program hours at Hilltop, Chula Vista, Rancho Del Rey and Castle Park Middle Schools, and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement SUBMITTED BY: Director of Recreation ~ f/1 REVIEWED BY: City Manageí"1Jr' (4/5thsVote: Yes_ No..xJ The adopted FY 04-05 Recreation Department budget includes funding to contract with the YMCA of San Diego County South Bay Branch (YMCA) for the provision of after-school services at four middle school sites during non-school hours. The City has contracted with the YMCA for these services on an annual basis since 1993, when City Council initially approved . funding for the newly established Youth Action Program. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution approving the Agreement between the City and the YMCA of San Diego County South Bay Branch, for the period of September 2004 through June 2005, in the amount of $15,010, for the provision of non-school hour programming, and authorizing the Mayor to sign the Agreement. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A. DISCUSSION: The Recreation Department and the Sweetwater Union High School District (District) jointly fund the Middle School after-school program (Club Teen Connection or Club TC). The program is additionally funded fiom Critical Hours Grants and Safe Neighborhood, Safe Schools Grants received by the individual schools. Collaborative partners in the program include the YMCA and South Bay Community Services, as well as the individual schools. Activities include sports, crafts, homework help, games, special events, field trips, specialized classes and much more. The program is fiee to all participants. In September of 1993, the City entered into an agreement with the YMCA for assistance in providing after-school hour programs at four middle schools. The initial agreement contained a provision that allowed the City and the YMCA to renew and extend the agreement on an annual basis until June 30, 2000. The City and the YMCA have informally extended the agreement annually since 1994, and the City continues to be satisfied with the services being provided by the YMCA. The attached agreement will more formally recognize this arrangement for after-school services. The City has $15,010 budgeted in the Recreation Department operating budget for these services. 6-1 page2,fiem:~ Meeting Date: 04/05/05 Funds are disbursed quarterly on a reimbursement basis, upon receipt fiom the YMCA of submittals including, but not limited to, employee timesheets, expenditure receipts, and monthly service and financial reports. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds of$15,010 for this agreement are included in the FY04-05 Recreation Department budget. One-half of this cost is reimbursed to the City by Sweetwater Union High School District. Attachments: A. Agreement between the City Of Chula Vista of Chula Vista and South Bay YMCA H:\home\parksrec\jg\extenyap.a13 6~2 RESOLUTION NO. 2005- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY SOUTH BAY BRANCH FOR THE PROVISION OF AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM HOURS AT HILLTOP, CHULA VISTA, RANCHO DEL REY AND CASTLE PARK MIDDLE SCHOOLS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Recreation Department and the Sweetwater Union High School District (District) jointly fund the Middle School after-school program (Club Teen Connection of Club TC); and WHEREAS, in September 1993, the City entered into an agreement with the YMCA for assistance in providing after-school hour programs at four middle schools; and WHEREAS, the City and the YMCA have informally extended the agreement annually since 1994, and the City continues to be satisfied with the services being provided by the YMCA; and WHEREAS, the City has $15,010 budgeted in the Recreation Department budget for these services; and WHEREAS, funds are disbursed quarterly on a reimbursement basis, upon receipt fiom the YMCA of submittals including, but not limited to, employee tirnesheets, expenditure receipts, and monthly service and financial reports. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City ofChula Vista does hereby approve the agreement between the City of Chula Vista and the YMCA of San Diego County South Bay Branch for the provision of after-school program hours at Hilltop, Chula Vista, Rancho Del Rey and Castle Park Middle Schools, and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement. Presented by Approved as to form by VCI-- 7, H..--- Buck Martin Recreation Director Ann Moore City Attorney J:Attomey/ResolAgreementIYMCA Agreement 4 05 05 6-3 THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND WILL BE FORMALLY SIGNED UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL Ð6-?~ Ann Moore City Attorney Dated: '3 -}o -os Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and The YMCA of San Diego County South Bay branch for The provision of after-school program hours at Hilltop, Chula Vista, Rancho Del Rey and Castle Park Middle Schools 6-4 Attachment A AGREEMENT BEJWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY SOUTH BAY BRANCH A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION For the provision of after-school program services at four middle schools THIS AGREEMENt, by and between the City of Chula Vista, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), and YMCA of San Diego County South Bay Branch, a nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "YMCA") to provide after-school services ("YMCA Program") at, Castie Park, Chula Vista, Hilltop, and Rancho Del Rey Middle Schools ("Middle Schools") during the time school is in session between September 7, 2004 and June 17, 2005; WITNESSETH WHEREAS, coordinated after-school programs are currently provided at Castle Park, Chula Vista. Hilltop, and Rancho Del Rey Middle Schools by staff from the City, YMCA, South Bay Community Services ("Middle School Statr), and staff from the Middle Schools ("School Coordinators"); and WHEREAS. the purpose of this Agreement is to have the City and YMCA establish a formal working relationship, and delineate the responsibiiities of the YMCA to provide a YMCA Program at the Middle Schoois and the compensation to be provided. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: I. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE YMCA YMCA shall perform the following: 1. Promote and foster a positive environment for the development of a succe!i!sful after-school program at the Middle Schools. 2. Attend bi-weekly School Coordinator's meetings at each school to discuss program goals and effectiveness. 3. Provide a YMCA Program, at each school, of ten (10) hours per week for a 39 week session during the school year; and ten (10) hours of staffing for Special Event programs (an event which departs from the routine, and is considered a program highlight), during the time period of the Agreement. 4. It is agreed that the YMCA will absorb other necessary expenses for required services in connection with the YMCA Program as its portion of the Agreement. 5. Provide a YMCA Supervisor to oversee and coordinate the after-school program, in cooperation with Middle School staff. II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY City shall perform the following: 1. Pay to the YMCA an amount up to $15,010 for the YMCA to provide the YMCA Program at Middle Schools. Page 1 of 3' H:\My Documenls\Grants\Agreement. YMCA niddle schocl4 schools 10-04.doc 6-5 III. COMPENSATION The City agrees to pay YMCA the sum of up to $15,010 to support after-school program services at four middle schools. It is the expectation of the parties that the funds are intended only to pay for staffing expenses. The amount set forth above is based on $3,753 per year for all four Middle Schools stated above. The City will disburse funds after submittal of a quarterly invoice as detailed below (on October 1, 2004; January 1, 2005; April 1, 2005; and June 17,2005. All invoices must be accompanied by a computer-generated (not spreadsheet) report. All invoices shall include Financial Summary Sheets, staff names, positions, hourly rates, costs and any other information as may be required by the Director of the Recreation Department.. IV. TERMINATION The term of this Agreement shall be July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005 for services to be provided during the School Year of September 7,2004 through June 17, 2005. Either party upon sixty- (60) day advance written notice may terminate this Agreement. V. HOLD HARMLESS /INSURANCE 1. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION Throughout the term of the Agreement, at YMCA's sole cost and expense, YMCA shall keep or cause to be kept in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of City and YMCA, comprehensive, broad form, general commercial liability insurance against claims and liability for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from YMCA's operations, providing protection of at least Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) combined single limit. All insurance required by this provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and rated A-5 or better in Best's Key Ratings, or the substantial equivalent satisfactory to the Risk Manager of the City of Chula Vista. YMCA agrees the City, its elected officials, officers, and employees shall be named additional insured on all such policies. All such policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against City and City's agents and representatives, (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by City, and (3) they cannot be canceled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days notice by the insurer to the City. YMCA shall furnish City with certificates and policy endorsements evidencing the coverage outlined in this section. YMCA agrees to hold harmless the City, their elected and appointed officers, trustees, agents and employees from and against all claims or damages, liability or costs and expense (including without limitation attorney's fees) arising out of the performance of this subcontract by the parties, their agents, employees or others except for only those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of City, its officers, agents, or employees. It is understood that such indemnity shall survive the termination of this agreement. 2. PERMITS/CHARGES YMCA shall, at its sole cost and expense, obtain any and all other governmental permits, approvals, or concurrences required. Further, YMCA agrees that it shall promptly pay all charges required from private persons or corporations for which it is responsible, including, but not limited to food, beverage and services and supply purchases, relating to providing a YMCA Program at the Middle Schools. 3. TRANSFER OR ASSIGNMENT Page 2 of 3" H:\My Documents\Gr.mts'v\greemenl- YMCA niddle school 4 schools 10-o4.doc: 6 _ 6 YMCA shall not assign or transfer this permit or any interest therein, nor shall this Agreement be subject to transfer or assignment by any court in any proceeding in which the YMCA is invoived without the Director of Recreation's prior written approval of such assignment or transfer. VI. FINGERPRINT CLEARANCE Each party is responsible for fingerprinting its employees who will be working with students. If the City or YMCA discover that an individual in their respective employment is placed at the school site who has a serious or violent felony conviction as defined by the Education Code, Section 44830.1, or a sex offense conviction or controlled substance conviction as defined by the Education Code, Section 44011, that individual's employment status and/or duties will be altered to comply with all local, state, and federal laws/regulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day indicated in the terms of the Agreement. Dated: ,2004 THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA YMCA of San Diego County - South Bay Branch Stephen C. Padilla, Mayor Approved as to form by: Ann Moore City Attorney Attest: Susan Bigelow, City Clerk Page 3 of 3 H;\My Dccuments\Grants\Agreemenl· YMCA middle sc;hool4 schools 10-04.doc 6 - 7 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Iteml Meeting Date 04/05/05 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving the first amendment to the design/build agreement with Systems Integrated for the construction of the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) System and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement Resolution Approving the agreement with Palomar Communications, Inc. for the installation of an antenna at Otay Mountain and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works Operations o::æ> REVIEWED BY: CityManager6tl1~ (4/SthsVote: Yes_No-1L) The City Council previously approved CIP project No. SW 218 to design and construct a Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) System that will provide an alarm system for controlling and monitoring sewer collection and pump stations throughout the City. Systems Integrated was selected to design and construct the SCADA System. Systems Integrated is requesting that the completion date for the construction of the SCADA System be extended by 90 working days; thereby eliminating liquidated damages. The increase in contract time will not impact the contract Guaranteed Maximum Price of $527,750. In addition, to obtain better communication and reliability for the SCADA System, an antenna needs to be installed on Otay Mountain. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1) Adopt the Resolution approving the first amendment to the design/build agreement with Systems Integrated for the construction of the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) System and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement 2) Adopt the Resolution approving the agreement with Palomar Communications, Inc. for the installation of an antenna at Otay Mountain and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement DISCUSSION: SCADA SYSTEM The Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) System will provide an alarm system for controlling and monitoring sewer lift stations, swimming pools, the Nature Center's water circulation 7-1 Page 2, Item L Meeting Date 04/05/05 equipment, and large (12") diameter sewer trunk lines located in remote areas. SCADA will enable crews to put more of an emphasis on preventive maintenance by providing real-time monitoring, instantaneous alarm notification, and computerized control of equipment and critical systems. The Salt Creek Interceptor will also be monitored by the SCADA system. Over the past several years, there have been several lift station failures, one of which resulted in a sewage spill into the Otay River. Currently when an alarm is activated, a signal is sent to a dispatch panel located in the basement of the old Police Department Building. This alarm is simultaneously transmitted to an auto-dialer, which notifies the pump crew via cell phone and pager. Consequently, the pump crew must then drive to the old Police Department Building to review the display panel in order to determine the location of the problem. The SCADA System will replace the current monitoring program with a state of the art process that will result in much faster response, the ability to correct problems remotely using a laptop computer, and eliminate failures. Sewage spills in remote areas in the City of San Diego have resulted in significant fines and bad publicity for San Diego. Therefore, alarms will also be installed in main trunk lines located in remote areas in the City of Chula Vista in the future. The Salt Creek trunk line included monitoring facilities when constructed. By doing so, the City will be able to reduce the number of times sewerage spills occur. And if a spill does occur, have immediate notification rather than rely on someone noticing it and reporting the spill. With more of an emphasis being placed on violations of the Clean Water Act by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, this should prevent fines by significantly reducing the duration and quantity of any spill, which may occur. Current fines are $15,000 per day plus $10 per gallon. For example, a 1,000 gallon spill (which is a minor spill) could result in a $25,000 fme. DESIGN/BUILD The City entered into an agreement with Systems Integrated (SI) for the provision of services required to design and construct the SCADA System. Systems Integrated, established in 1974, has been providing automated control systems for the past 28 years. SI is a California LLC with offices worldwide, including in Orange and San Diego counties. Systems Integrated is fully qualified to support all aspects of the implementation of the SCADA System from determining the overall requirements of the system to providing specifications for the implementation of the system, including conceptual and detailed engineering, project management, etc. as well as providing all aspects of the installation, commissioning, training and long-term support. Systems Integrated is requesting that the completion date for the construction of the SCADA System be extended by 90 working days; thereby eliminating liquidated damages ($100 for each calendar , day) based on the scope of supply, radio communication system and additional developer sites (all of which) are discussed below: 7-2 Page 3, Item ~ Meeting Date 04/05/05 Scope of Supplv. During the initial investigation of the existing equipment, SI determined that several of the pump stations were equipped with different manufacturers of pump control panels with various control schemes. SI decided to replace the existing controls at these sites with new pump control panels and bubbler control systems at no additional cost to the City. As a result, SI will be absorbing approximately $40,000 in additional costs to design and manufacture this equipment. This will result in the following benefits: · Standard control panels utilizing uniform equipment that will minimize the spare parts required to support the maintenance of the system in future years; · Bubbler systems are inherently more reliable than float mechanisms in wastewater applications; and · Maintenance training will be simplified with fewer control systems to support and maintain. Radio Communication Svstem. The radio communication system is the main part of the SCADA system and this must perform properly in order for the rest of the system to operate. During the design of the system, several issues arose which caused delays in the design of the system: · SI decided to use a state-of-the-art 5.8 Ghz microwave radio system (helps access system with laptop) that will provide additional features to the City in terms of increased bandwidth for mobile access and monitoring of the system. This required a detailed radio survey and design effort; · The radio survey revealed several geographic obstacles in the form of hills and valleys throughout the City, which had to be addressed in the design. This required additional field surveys and multiple visits to determine the optimal radio system design; · The new radio system design required the addition of two repeater sites at facilities operated by the Sweetwater Authority (staff is negotiating with them now). The process of coordination and approval with Sweetwater is stilI in process and their decision will affect the fmal radio system design; · The main repeater at Otay Mountain required a field visit to determine the location of the equipment and coordination with the communication tower operators. The initial site visit was delayed due to the approval process of the site Entry & Testing agreement and substantial rains that occurred in October of 2004. Contracts are currently being reviewed and need to be executed in order for equipment to be put into place; and · The original radio consultant retained by SI to design the radio system failed to deliver an adequate design after two attempts. SI was forced to take over this responsibly and start fiom scratch in the design of the radio system. Additional Developer Sites. SI was requested by the City to work with the developers and contractors on the Rolling Hills Ranch sewer lift station and Eastlake Woods storm pump station projects. This process started in 2004 and is continuing today, which involved the following: 7-3 Page 4, Item L Meeting Date 04/05/05 · The development of design drawing and specifications; · Coordination with multiple consulting engineers and contractors; and · Multiple design meetings and review to insure these sites are built to the same standards as the new SCADA system. SI is being paid by developers to include their sites. Therefore, there is no additional cost to the City's contract. CONCLUSION. Upgrades to the scope of supply, difficulties experienced with the radio communication system and providing assistance for two additional developer sites have impacted Systems Integrated's ability to complete the SCADA project in accordance with the original schedule of225 working days (which expired on March 3, 2005). It is Systems Integrated's contention that the new hardware proposed (at no additional cost to the City) and the additional time spent on the radio system design will result in an enhanced system that will provide increased reliability and capability to the City. Staff recommends approval of the first amendment for the construction of the SCADA system as the increase in contract time will not impact the contract Guaranteed Maximum Price of$527,750. A total of$150,075 has been paid to Systems Integrated to-date. In addition, to obtain better communication and reliability for the SCADA System, an antenna and communication equipment needs to be installed on Otay Mountain. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the three-year agreement with Palomar Communications, Inc. for the antenna installation at a cost of$300 per month or $3,600 annually. FISCAL IMPACT: The SCADA system was included as part as the City's Capital Improvement Program, which is funded by Sewer Funds. Systems Integrated will perform all services, work, and obligations as described necessary to provide a fully completed and functional SCADA System, which include design services, general conditions, and construction management. Approval of the first amendment will not impact the contract Guaranteed Maximum Price of$527,750. To obtain better communication and reliability for the SCADA System, staff recommends approval of the agreement to install an antenna on Otay Mountain. The impact to the Sewer Fund will be $3,600 annually. C:\Documents and Settings\robertb\My Documents\Bob\Al13 SCADA Contract Time.doc 7-4 RESOLUTION NO. 2005- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DESIGN BUILD AGREEMENT WITH SYSTEMS INTEGRATED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION (SCADA) SYSTEM AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved CIP project No. SW-218 to design and construct a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System that will provide an alann system for controlling and monitoring sewer collection and pump stations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, currently when an alann is activated, a signal is sent to a dispatch panel located in the basement of the old Police Department building. This alann is simultaneously transmitted to an auto-dialer, which notifies the pump crew via cell phone and pager. The pump crew must then drive to the old Pòlice Department Building to review the display panel in order to determine the location of the problem; and WHEREAS, the SCADA System will replace the current monitoring program with a state of the art process that will result in much faster response, the ability to correct problems remotely using a laptop computer, and eliminate failures; and WHEREAS, Systems Integrated is requesting that the completion date for the construction of the SCADA System be extended by 90 working days; thereby eliminating liquidated damages ($100 for each calendar day) based on the addition of scope of supply, radio communications system and additional developer sites; and WHEREAS, staff recommends approval of the first amendment to the Design Build Agreement for the construction of the SCADA system as the increase in contract time will not impact the contract Guaranteed,Maximum Price of$527, 750; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City ofChula Vista does hereby approve a First Amendment to the Design Build Agreement with Systems Integrated for the construction of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCAD A); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of ChuIa Vista is hereby authorized to execute said Amendment on behalf of the City ofChula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by Dave Byers Director of Public Works Operations J :\attcmey\reso\ lit Amendment SCADA 7-5 THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND WILL BE FORMALLY SIGNED UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL ~hJ/ac Ann Moore City Attorney Dated: ði2r¡ k The First Amendmeht to tlÍe Agreement with Systems Integrated for the construction of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System 7-6 . --....--------.--------..--- ^^-_._.-._.------~-_.__._- FIRST AMENDMENT TO the Design Build Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and SystelÌlS Integrated LLC for Design and ConstnJction of the Supervisory Coutrol And Data Acquisition (SCADA) System RecitaJs This First Amendment is entered into effective as of March 4. 2005 . by and between the City ofChula Vista ("City") and Systems Integrated ("Design Builder or D/B'') with reference to the following facts: WHEREAS, City and D/B entered into an agreement ("Original Agreemenf'), dated March 16,2004 and approved by City Council Resolution 2004-078 whereby D/B provides design and construction services to the City for the construction of the SCADA System; and WHEREAS, the Original Agreement contained a:final completion schedule not to exceed 225 working days which had been based upon very prelirn;m,ry drawings; and WHEREAS, during the preparation of the design and construction documents staff determined that the final completion schedule would be insufficient to accomplish the renovations and additions necessary for the project; and WHEREAS, D/B and City staff have determined the projected schedule must be increased to ensure the City receives the best work and product; and WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Agreement to increase the contract time by 90 working days to a total of 315 working days for the complete design and construction of the SCADA system. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual obligation of the parties set forth herein, the City and Design Builder agree as follows: 1. Section 1.3 of the Original Agreement, entitled General Scope of Work to be Perfonned by D/B, is hereby amended as follows: 1.3.2 Achieve "Substantial Completion" (as defined in §16.1) No later than 315 Working days ftom issuance of Notice to Proceed at execution of Agreement. 1.3.3 Achieve "Final Completion" (as defined in §16.2) No later than 345 Working days from issuance of Notice to Proceed at execution of Agreement. 7-7 2. Exhibit 2 of the Original Agreement shall be substituted with the Revised Exhibit 2 as attached hereto. 3. Except as expressly provided herein all other provisions of the original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 7-8 MAR-29-2005 15:14 FROM:SI ORANGE 1- (714) 998-6059 TO: 96193976259 P.1'1 SIGNATURE PAGE TO 11!E FIRST AMENDMENT TO DESIGN BUILD AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND, SYSTEMS INTEGRATED u...C. FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUPERVISORY CON1ROL AND DATA ACQUISmON, (SCADA) SYSTEM City of Chula Vista Systems Integrated LLC by Steve Padilla, Mayor by'~A4f)~~' Susan Corrales-Diaz CbiefOperating Officer Date ATfEST: Susan Bigelow, City Clerk Approved in foom by: Ann Moore, City Attorney 7-9 RESOLUTION NO. 2005- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH PALOMAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AN ANTENNA AT OTAY MOUNTAIN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved CIP project No. SW-2l8 to design and construct a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System that will provide an alann system for controlling and monitoring sewer collection and pump stations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, to obtain better communication and reliability for the SCADA System, an antenna needs to be installed on Otay Mountain; and WHEREAS, staff recommends entering into a three year lease with Palomar Communications to allow the placement of antenna at Otay Mountain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the agreement with Palomar Communications, Inc., for installation of an antenna at Otay Mountain; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized to execute said Amendment on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by Dave Byers Director of Public Works Operations J :\attcrney\reso\Agreement\Palomar Corrununicatioos Agreement 7-10 THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND WILL BE FORMALLY SIGNED UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL tf~'#r~ Dated:./Jk h5' Agreement with Palomar éommunications, Inc. For the installation of an antenna at Otay Mountain 7-11 SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE, made this 1st day of Februarv , 2005, between Palomar Communications Inc., a California corporation, having its principal office at 2230 Micro Place, Escondido, California, 92029 hereinafter referred to as Lessor, and Citv of Chula Vista hereinafter referred to as Lessee: 1. Lessor hereby grants permission to Lessee to install, maintain, operate and remove communications equipment, ("Equipment") on and in Lessor's property, antenna site and/or equipment room, herein sometimes referred to as the "Premises", located at 1/4 mile S.W. of Doahouse Junction. Otav Mountain. CA specifically, three 5.8 GHz radios and auxiliary eauipment all contained in one 48"x 19" rack space. Radios to be mounted on the tower near the antennas or in the above specified rack space and the associated cables and antennas specifically, one 24"x 3.5" sector antenna and two 14"x 14" panel antennas to be placed at the 10 ft. level. 2. TERM AND TERMINATION - This Lease shall become effective upon installation of equipment or thirty (30) days from the afore mentioned date, which ever shall occur first, and shall continue in effect for a term of THREE year (s). This Lease may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days advance written notice. On termination of the Lease in accordance with any of its terms, Lessee shall immediately remove its antennas, wires, and appliances from Lessor's premises. 3. ATTACHMENTS TO PREMISES BY LESSEE - Lessee shall, at its own expense, maintain any Equipment on or attached to the Premises in a safe condition and in good repair, and in a manner reasonably suitable to Lessor so as not to conflict with the use of the premises by Lessor, or by any other company using the premises and so as not to interfere with the working use of facilities thereon or to be placed thereon. Lessee agrees to install equipment of types and frequencies which will not cause interference to Lessor or other existing Lessees of Lessor's property, antenna site and/or equipment room. In the event Lessee's equipment causes such interference, Lessee will take all steps necessary to correct and eliminate the interference. If said interference cannot be eliminated within forty-eight (48) hours after receipt of written notice from Lessor to Lessee, Lessee shall seek regulatory authorization to temporarily disconnect the electric power and shut down Lessee's equipment (except for intermittent operation for the purpose of testing, after performing maintenance, repair, modification, replacement, or other action taken for th~ purpose of correcting such interference). If such interference is not corrected within thirty (30) days after receipt o"f said written notice, Lessee 7-12 agrees to seek regulatory authorization to establish alternative facilities and to remove its equipment from the premises. This Lease shall then terminate without further obligation by either party, except as may be specifically enumerated herein. 4. Lessor agrees that Lessee shall have free access to Lessor's property, antenna site and/or equipment room for the purpose of installing, maintaining and operating Lessee's equipment, and Lessor further agrees to give Lessee free ingress and egress to the premises during the continuation of this Lease and any renewals thereof. Lessor shall furnish Lessee with necessary keys for the purpose of ingress and egress to the premises. It is agreed, however, that only authorized engineers, employees, contractors, sub-contractors, and agents of Lessee, FCC inspectors, or persons under their direct supervision, will be permitted to enter the premises. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTES AND REGULATIONS - Antennas, wires and appliances of Lessee shall be erected and maintained in accordance with the requirements and specifications of the safety codes of the State of California, or any amendments or revisions thereof, and in compliance with any rules or orders now in effect, or that hereafter may be issued by the Federal Communications commission. 6. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF PREMISES - Lessor reserves to itself, its successors, and assigns, the right to maintain the premises and to operate its facilities thereon in such manner as will best enable it to fulfill its own service requirements, but in accordance with the specifications herein mentioned. Lessor shall not be liable to Lessee for any interruption of service of Lessee or for interference with the operation of the equipment, wires and appliances of Lessee arising in any manner from use of the premises hereunder, unless due to negligence of Lessor , its employees, agents or invitees. 7. RENTAL OF PREMISES - Lessee shall pay to Lessor for the use of the premises described hereunder, a rental rate of Three Hundred Dollars per month, payable in advance, commencing on the commencement date of the lease as provided for in Paragraph 2. 8. UTILITIES - Electrical power is to be supplied and paid for by: X Lessor or Lessee. 9. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT - All B.L.M. fees resulting from the installation and use of the Lessee's equipment at the Premises shall be paid by the Lessee within 30 days of being presented with the amount of such fees. Not applicable this lease. 10. INDEMNIFICATIONS AND INSURANCE - Lessee shall indemnify Lessor against any and all claims and demands for damages to property and injury or death to ~ersons, including any payments made under any workmen's compensation law or any plan for 7-13 employee's disability and death benefits, which may arise out of or be caused by the installation, maintenance, presence, use or removal of Lessee's equipment, or by any act of Lessee on or in the vicinity of the premises described hereunder. Lessor shall indemnify Lessee and hold Lessee harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses and causes of action, of whatever kind or nature, which are suffered by or asserted against Lessee by any person, and which arise out of, or in connection with, or are based upon, any acts or omissions of negligence on the part of Lessor, its employees, agents or invitees under this Lease. Lessee shall carry adequate insurance to protect the parties hereto against any and all claims, demands, actions, judgments, costs, expenses and liabilities which may arise or result, directly or indirectly from Lessee's use of the Premises, except such liability as shall arise out of the negligence of Lessor. The amounts of such insurance against liability due to damage to property shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.); as to anyone occurrence and against liability due to injury or death of a person, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.). Lessee shall also carry such insurance as will protect it from all claims under any workmen's compensation laws in effect that may be applicable to Lessee. All insurance required hereunder shall remain in force for the entire life of this agreement. Upon request, Lessee shall, so long as this Lease shall remain in force, provide to Lessor current certificates of insurance evidencing that such insurance is in full force and effect. 11. RIGHTS TO EQUIPMENT - Any and all machinery, equipment and trade fixtures installed by Lessee shall remain personalty notwithstanding the fact that it may be affixed or attached to the realty, and shall, during the term of this Lease or any extension or renewal thereof, belong to and be removable for Lessee. Lessee may, at its election, remove said machinery, equipment and trade fixtures on or before the expiration of the term of this Lease provided that Lessee shall repair any damage caused by said removal wear and tear acceptable.' Any of Lessee's property remaining on the Premises thirty (30) days after the expiration or termination of this Lease, which Lessor does not require Lessee to remove, shall become the property of Lessor, free of any claim by Lessee or any person claiming through Lessee. 12. RENTAL RATE INCREASE - The rental rate of $300.00 per month shall be reviewed annually on the anniversary date on the beginning of the Term, and shall be adjusted as follows: The basis for completing the adjustment is the Wholesale Price Index, published by the united States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics ("Index"), which is published for the date nearest the date of the Term ("Beginning Index"). If the Index published nearest the anniversary adjustment date ("Extension Index") has increased over the Beginning Index, the minimum monthly rent for the following year shall be set by multiplying the minimum monthly rent set forth in Paragraph 7 above by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Extension Index and the denominator of which is the Beginning Index. If the Index is 'discontinued or revised during 7-14 this Term, such other government Index or computation with which it is replaced shall be used in order to obtain substantially the same resul t as would have been obtained if the Index had not been discontinued or revised. 13. DEFAULT - In the event Lessee fails to comply with any of the provisions of this Lease, including the specifications herein mentioned, or default in any of its obligations under this Lease, Lessor may, at its option, immediately terminate this Lease provided Lessor has given Lessee ten (10) days written notice of such default and Lessee has failed to cure the same within twenty (20) days after receipt of such notice provided, however, that where such default cannot reasonably be cured in such twenty (20) day period, if Lessee shall proceed promptly to cure the same and prosecute such curing with due diligence, the time for curing such default shall be extended for such period of time as may be necessary to complete such curing. Lessor hereby expressly waives its Landlord's lien and any and all rights granted by or under any present or future laws to levy or distrain for rent, in arrears, in advance, or both upon any or all antennas, machinery, equipment and other personal property of Lessee or any assignee or sub-tenant of Lessee on the Premises. In addition, Lessor will not, except in any emergency, cure any alleged default by Lessee until after the expiration of twenty (20) days after Lessee's receipt of notice provided for herein and then only if Lessee has failed, during such period, to cure such default or perform such act. 14. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLEASE - Lessee shall have the right to assign this Lease or to sublet without Lessor's consent, to any parent, subsidiary or affiliate of Lessee or to any person, firm or corporation which shall be controlled by, under the control of, or under common control with Lessee, or any corporation into which Lessee may be merged or consolidated or which purchases all or substantially all of the assets of Lessee. Lessor covenants and agrees that it will not unreasonably withhold or delay its consent to any other assignment of this Lease, or subletting of all or any part of the Premises, to any other person, firm or corporation. Notwi thstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall remain liable hereunder just as fully as if such assignment or subletting had not been made. 15. ATTORNEY'S FEES - In the event of any action filed in relation to this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other reasonable attorney's fees and other disbursements. 16. MANNER OF GIVING NOTICE - Any notice to be given under this Lease shall be mailed to the party to be notified at the address set forth herein, by registered or certified mail with postage prepaid, and shall be deemed given when so mailed. Any demand or notice to either party may be given to the other party by addressing the written no~ice to: 7-15 Lessor: Palomar Communications, Inc. 2230 Micro Place Escondido, CA 92029 Lessee: Citv of Chula Vista. Public Works 1800 Maxwell Rd. Chula Vista, CA 91911 . 17. Lessor covenants and agrees with Lessee that upon Lessee paying the rent and observing and performing all the terms, covenants and conditions, on Lessee's part to be observed and performed, Lessee may peacefully and quietly enjoy the Premises, subject nevertheless to the terms and conditions of this Lease. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT, SEVERABILITY - This Lease embodies the entire agreement between the parties. It may not be modified or terminated except as provided herein or by other written agreement between the parties. If any provision herein is invalid, it shall be considered deleted from this Lease, and shall not invalidate the remaining provisions of this Lease. 19. PARTIES' BOUND BY AGREEMENT - Subject to the provisions hereof, this Lease shall extend to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 20. TOWER MARKING & LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS Lessor acknowledges, that it, and not Lessee, shall be responsible for compliance with all tower or building marking and lighting requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") or the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"). Lessor shall indemnify and hold Lessee ,harmless from any fines, or other liabilities caused by Lessor's failure to comply with such requirements. Further, should Lessee be cited by either the FCC or FAA because this site is not in compliance, and if Lessor does not cure the conditions of noncompliance within the time frame allowed by the citing agency, Lessee may terminate this License Agreement immediately upon notice to Lessor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement on the day and the year first above written. Lesso~palomar Communications, Inc. By: , a/iÂ.~ Title: Dean R. Hovey, President Lessee: Citv of Chula Vista By:,;x:, Title: /Y¡ City Attorney: ~JdL~;' iJdØ 7-16 ~ f ft.. ~ ------~ - - ~~ 01Y OF (HULA VISfA HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION February 28, 2005 To Whom It May Concem: With respect to the City of Chula Vista's installation of antenna at Otay Mountain on property owned by Palomar Communications, the purpose of this letter to advise you of insurance coverage available to the City. Our employees are covered for injuries arising in the course of their work by ourself-insured workers' compensation program. For General and Auto Liability exposures we are permissibly self-insured for the first $250,000 and are members of the San Diego Pooled Program Insurance Authority (SANDPIPA) for losses up to $2M. Above that, we purchase commercial insurance. Sincerely, (Í~~ Sr. Risk Management Specialist City of Chula Vista Human Resources / Risk Management 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA. 91910 -.. jgalleher@ci.chula-vista.ca.us PH: (619) 476-5372 Fax: (619) 691-5199 7-17 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item: '6 Meeting Date: 4/5/05 ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING $18,000 FROM THE CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND APPROPRIATING SAID FUNDS TO THE FY 2004/2005 SUPPLIES AND SERVICES BUDGET OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT A PROGRAM EVALUATION ON THE BULLYING PREVENTION PROGRAM. REVIEWED BY: Chief of Police ~ City Manager ~ 9'-/ (4/5ths Vote: YeslLNo -> SUBMITTED BY: The Police Department has received additional funding from the Chula Vista Elementary'School District to support the Bullying Prevention Program funded by the School Community Policing Partnership (SCPP) grant. As stipulated in the grant project narrative, a program evaluation will be conducted on the Bullying Prevention Program to create best practices in the area of bullying prevention. The Chula Vista Elementary School District has recently assigned this task to the Police Department. The Police Department will contract with two bullying prevention experts to conduct this evaluation. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopts the resolution accepting $18,000 from the Chula Vista Elementary School District and appropriating said funds to the FY 2004/2005 supplies and services budget of the Police Department to conduct a program evaluation on the Bullying Prevention Program. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A BACKGROUND: In June 2002, the Chula Vista Elementary School District was awarded $324,342 for a School Community Policing Partnership (SCPP) grant. The School District partnered with the Police Department to implement a Bullying Prevention Program. As partners of the SCPP grant, the Police Department has received grant funds in the amount of $129,153 to support the Bullying Prevention Program. 8-1 Page 2,ltem: Meeting Date: ct 4/5/05 DISCUSSION: The Police Department. has received additional funding from the Chula Vista Elementary School District to support the Bullying Prevention Program funded by the School Community Policing Partnership (SCPP) grant. With this funding, the Police Department will hire two consultants to conduct a program evaluation on the Bullying Prevention Program that was implemented at Harborside Elementary, Otay Elementary and Vista Square Elementary. The Department will work directly with the evaluators to conduct a process and impact evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Based on the findings report, a best practices framework will be created and used with future Bullying Prevention implementations in Chula Vista schools. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this resolution will result in the appropriation of $18,000 to the supplies and services budget of the Police Department. The funding from the School Community Policing Partnership grant will completely offset the costs of contracting with the consultants to conduct process and impact evaluation on the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program, resulting In no net impact to the General Fund. . 8-2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING $18,000 FROM THE CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND APPROPRIATING SAID FUNDS TO THE FY 2004/2005 SUPPLIES AND SERVICES BUDGET OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT A PROGRAM EVALUATION ON THE BULLYING PREVENTION PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the Police Department has received additional funding from the Chula Vista Elementary School District to support the Bullying Prevention Program funded by the School Community Policing Partnership grant; and WHEREAS, the Police Department will contract with two national experts in the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program to conduct a program evaluation on the implementation and success of the program, and WHEREAS, acceptance of the funds from the Chula Vista Elementary School District will offset the cost of services used to conduct the program evaluation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept $18,000 from the Chula Vista Elementary School District and appropriate said funds to the FY 2004/2005 supplies and services budget of the Police Department to conduct a program evaluation on the Bullying Prevention Program. Approved as to form by: Richard P. Emers n Police Chief ~IJL'(Q~ \'\Cì (~("¡\i Ann Moore City Attorney 8-3 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date 4/05/2005 q ITEM TITLE: Resolution Making preliminary determinations and declaring intention to issue bonds to refund the outstanding bonds issued for certain existing Assessment Districts and Community Facility Districts and ordering a report thereon. SUBMITTED BY: Director of FinancefTreasur~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~r 1ìC"" (4/5ths Vote: Yes _No--X-) SUMMARY: The City currently has six assessment districts and ten community facilities districts with outstanding debt. A preliminary review performed by municipal banking firm, Stone & Youngberg, indicates that under the current low interest rate environment, the outstanding debt of two assessment districts and seven community facilities districts may be refinanced in order to achieve significant savings to the property owners on their annual assessments. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Resolution making preliminary determinations and declaring intention to issue bonds to refund outstanding improvement bonds issued for certain existing assessment districts and ordering a report thereon. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: None DISCUSSION: The City began utilizing infrastructure assessment districts in 1985 in order to provide long-term financing for necessary infrastructure in newly developing areas of the City. There are currently six assessment districts and ten community facilities districts with outstanding debt. When new districts are formed, the related debt is necessarily issued without a credit rating and as such, carries higher interest rates than a comparable debt with an investment grade credit rating. As development occurs within each district, the responsibility for the annual debt service payments is gradually spread over more and more property owners, which improves the credit quality of the debt. When this factor is combined with the availability of overall lower interest rates, there is the potential to refinance or refund the outstanding debt in order to lower the annual debt service payments and the related property owner assessments. In 1995, the City refinanced the outstanding debt of four assessment districts, and in 2001, six assessment districts were refinanced. 9-1 Page 2, Item q Meeting Date 4/05/05 Stone & Youngberg recently submitted a proposal to consider a pooled refinancing of the outstanding debt (approximately $140 million) of up to nine districts, including: AD 1995 Refinancing AD97-2 CFD97-3 CFD99-1 (1999) CFD99-1 (2001) CFD2000-1 CFD2001-1 CFD06-1 CFD2001-2 Eastlake/Rancho Del Rey Otay Ranch Village 1 Lomas Verdes Otay Ranch SPA 1 Otay Ranch SPA 1 Sunbow II Villages 5 -10 San Miguel Ranch Area A Eastlake-Woods, Vistas Area A McMillin-Otay Ranch Village 6 The estimated savings varies by district, but ranges from 6% to 19% based on the current interest rate environment. The projected aggregate annual savings would be approximately $1 million, and projected total savings over the life of the existing debt would be over $14 million. These savings would be shared by approximately 19,000 homeowners. The recommended financing structure would be very similar to that used in the previous refinancings, utilizing a process authorized under the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act. This entails the City's Public Financing Authority acting as a conduit in issuing the refunding bonds on a pooled basis for all ten districts. This pooling structure facilitates blending the credit characteristics of the different districts to achieve a better overall credit, payment of only one set of issuance costs, minimizing the number of legally required reserve funds, and simplifying administrative tasks associated with multiple districts. The tentative schedule would have staff returning to Council for the final approval of the transaction in early summer so that the new assessments could the reflected on the County property tax rolls in August. FISCAL IMPACT: All costs associated with this refinancing including costs for the underwriting, bond counsel and financial advisor firms are contingent upon actually selling bonds and are payable from the bond proceeds. With a preliminary bond sizing of $140 million, the approximate fees for services would be as follows: Underwriter - not to exceed 1 % of the bond size, Bond Counsel- $164,000, Financial Advisor - $115,000. Staff has verified that these fees are in line with levels that the City has previously paid and also what other jurisdictions are currently paying. 9-2 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAKING PRELIMINARY DETERMINATIONS AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS TO REFUND THE OUTSTANDING BONDS ISSUED FOR CERTAIN EXISTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS AND COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICTS AND ORDERING A REPORT THEREON WHEREAS, the City began utilizing infiastructure assessment districts in 1985 in order to provide long-term financing for necessary infiastructure in newly developing areas of the City; and WHEREAS, there are currently six assessment districts and ten community facilities districts with outstanding debt; and WHEREAS, when new districts are formed, the related debt is necessarily issued without a credit rating and as such, carries higher interest rates than a comparable debt with an investment grade credit rating; and WHEREAS, in 1995, the City refinanced the outstanding debt of four assessment districts, and in 200 I, six assessment districts were refinanced; and WHEREAS, a preliminary review performed by municipal banking firm, Stone & Youngberg, indicates that under the current low interest rate environment, the outstanding debt of two assessment districts and seven community facilities districts should be refinanced in order to achieve significant savings to the property owners on their annual assessments; and WHEREAS, the estimated savings varies by district, but ranges fiom a low of 6.1 % to a high of 19.3 % based on the current interest rate environment; and WHEREAS, the projected aggregate annual savings would be approximately $1.3 million and projected total savings, over the life ofthe existing debt, would be over $14.8 million; and WHEREAS, the recommended refinancing structure would be very similar to that used in the previous refinances, utilizing a process authorized under the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act; and WHEREAS, this involves using the City's Public Financing Authority, which would act as a conduit in issuing the refunding bonds on a pooled basis for all ten districts; and WHEREAS, the tentative schedule would have staff returning to the City Council for the final approval of the transaction in early summer so that the new assessments could the reflected on the County property tax rolls in August 9-3 __U·__ ....._.~. .".__ __ _ ____._ ____.__ ----.....-.------------,--------...-- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby making preliminary determinations and declares its intent to issue bonds to refund the outstanding bonds issued for two Assessment Districts (AD 1995 Refmancing, AD 97-2) and seven Community Facility Districts (CFDs 97-3, 99-1-1999, 99-1-2001, 2000-1, 2001-1, 2001-2, 06-1) and ordering a report thereon. Presented by Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance J:\attomey\reso\finance\Assessment Dist and CFD bonds 9-4 Approved as to form by Va- { . (--f-c--..- Ann Moore City Attorney 2 ~~f? ~ ~~--~ - - -- CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA STATEMENT CßY OF ŒUlA VISTA Item: 10 Meeting Date: April 5. 2005 Resolution Of The Chula Vista City Council Appropriating $50,000 for Participating at the California Public Utilities Commission; for Phase II Development of Community Choice Aggregation, and the Otay Mesa Transmission Project from the Available Fund Balance of the General Fund to the Conservation & Environmental Services Department Therefor. ITEM TITLE: SUBMITTED BY: Assistant City Manager Director of Cons¢biî!i0n & Enyironmental Services REVIEWED BY: City Manager (Yl {'è 9(1/ (4/5ths Vote: Yes.lL No} Staff and outside counsel will continue to participate in workshops and proceedings at the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to support Phase II development of Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), and the City's interest in the Otay Mesa Power Purchase Agreement Transmission Project as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding with SDG&E. Phase I of the CCA concluded in December 2004 by establishing a reasonable framework for applying the Cost Responsibility Surcharge (CRS) to future CCA's and a number of administrative issues. The CRS primarily funds the cost of power purchases by the State Department of Water Resources during the energy "crisis." The Administrative Law Judge for Phase II has committed to facilitating the process personally and has established a deliberate schedule of weekly workshops and hearings through May 2005 with the intent of presenting a decision to the CPUC for their action in June of this year. Phase II is expected to complete the development of regulations and tariffs for CCA implementation. Phase II will address a number of issues that potentially modify the interim CRS and establish potential tariff's that allow the Investor Owned Utility to recover any operating costs that may occur when CCA customers are established. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution appropriating $50,000 for participating at the CPUC regarding Phase II development of CCA (approximately $25,000), and the Otay Mesa Transmission Project (approximately $25,000) from the available fund balance of the general fund to the Conservation & Environmental Services Department Therefor. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: Otav Mesa Power Purchase Aqreement Transmission Proiect The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) bètween the City and San Diego Gas & Electric in October of 2004 places significant emphasis on extending a six-year 10-1 Page: 2 of 4 Meeting Date: April 5. 2005 commitment to under-grounding electricity lines within Chula Vista that is unprecedented in the SDG&E service territory. The MOU builds on that commitment by targeting additional under-grounding of approximately 3 miles of proposed new transmission lines along the Chula Vista bay front. Approximately $25,000 of the funding will support the City's participation at the CPUC at least though June 30, 2005 when the majority of activity for this project is scheduled to occur. Communitv Choice Aqqreqation Under Council direction the City began purchasing "green" electricity, generated primarily by photovoltaic (solar) and wind sources in 1998. In May 2001 the City Council adopted an energy Strategy and Action plan that included the consideration of aggregating the purchase and delivery of energy for a broader segment of the City. That component was endorsed by SDG&E at the time. In June 2001 the City passed Ordinance 2835 declaring itself a Municipal Utility. In September 2002 the state legislature passed AB117 establishing CCA. In June 2004 the City refined its municipal utility position to accommodate state legislation and passed Ordinance 2969 declaring itself a Community Choice Aggregator. In May 2004, Staff presented the Municipal Energy Utility Feasibility Study, Peer Review and Staff reports to City Council and distributed copies of the Study to the public and stakeholders. The Study recommended aggregation as one of the best business models and opportunities for the City to begin participating in shaping and managing the community's energy future. At the June 8, 2004 Council meeting the City Council directed staff to "participate fully in the CCA rulemaking before the CPUC." Staff has worked with other local government agencies and the CPUC to develop fair and reasonable regulations for implementing the provisions that meet the intent and spirit of AB 117 establishing CCA. In May 2004 the Feasibility Study outlined the CCA business model: The City has the option to serve as a CCA for electric power pursuant to Assembly Bill 117. A CCA is an entity that procures electric energy for residents and businesses within a community. Under this business model, the City would not own the electric or gas distribution system within the City. Rather, it would procure electric power and/or natural gas, either through owning a generation facility, market purchases, or through a partner, on behalf of the customers .that choose to aggregate their load. As a CCA, the City would use SDG&E's distribution and potentially, transmission facilities to deliver electricity and/or natural gas to its customers. This business model is subject to the California CPUC review of the City's Implementation Plan, including the adoption and application of exit fees and the implementation of final rules by the CPUC. The following table provides a summary of the projected financial benefits to the Chula Vista community by various business model combinations, as estimated by the Study Team: 10-2 Page: 3 of 4 Meeting Date: April 5. 2005 ompanson 0 usmess o e s Electricity Nominal NPVof Average Business Model Supply Savings 1 Savings 1 Annual Strategy ($ Millions) ($ Millions) Savings (%) CCA Generation 244 90 8% CCA Contracts 86 28 2% " c f MEU B M d I Savings Indicated are for the full 18-year study penod. The Study reports that the recommended CCA business models would be financially viable if supported by power purchase agreements. The Study also reports that the financial viability of the MEU business models in the table above would be enhanced, if supported by in-city electricity generation with a capacity of 130MW. Peer Review To test and validate the Study's conclusions and recommendations, Staff obtained the peer review services of three independent energy consultants and two ratepayer advocate groups. The Peer review reports made several significant contributions to the process, not the least of which were, verifying that the Study Team had taken a very conservative approach to estimating the projected savings from each business model. Each business model continued to produce significant financial benefits for the community, even after the Study team applied a sensitivity analysis to the key assumptions and the most volatile factors underlying the Study's recommendations. Additional Benefits The Study and peer review clearly indicate that the City can operate a financially successful CCA, and whichever business model the City Council wishes to focus on, risks can be successfully managed through phasing, and the utilization of the successful business practices used by the 1,900 existing California and U.S public utilities. The Study identifies additional benefits that compliment the City's objectives for its energy future: · Establish a local CCA structure that is accountable to local ratepayers, stabilizes rates, improves reliability, reduces or eliminates brown outs, maintains the highest level of customer service and focuses on delivering value to the community. · Invest in a long-term environmentally sustainable energy future based on renewable sources that do not use fossil fuels. · Invest in medium-term energy procurement and power generation strategies that reflect the City's commitment to a sustainable environment and pleaner air including; C02 reduction, the prevention of global warming, and particulate reduction. · Invest in energy procurement and generation, infrastructure and operational services that maintain existing jobs and create new quality jobs for local residents. . · Use CCA as an economic development tool to retain and attract businesses. 10-3 Page: 4 of 4 Meeting Date: April 5. 2005 · Generate new city revenues at no increased cost to ratepayers. · Equitably invest new revenues generated from a CCA business throughout the City in the form of enhanced existing services and/or new services. · Enhance Chula Vista's vision to continue as a vibrant community in the region and a leader in environmental stewardship. Staff estimates that this funding request will cover the projected costs for participating at the CPUC on transmission issues, and continued work with local governments throughout the state, the CPUC and Investor Owned Utilities on Phase II of CCA at least through June 30, 2005. Staff will include any additional costs of completing the development of CCA rules at the CPUC and developing and submitting the CCA implementation plan to the CPUC in the 2005-06-budget cycle. Not including this request, the City has appropriated approximately $1,370,000 and expended approximately $1,128,000 to implement the Energy Strategy and SDG&E negotiations since 2000. The appropriations have funded technical consultants, outside counsel and the City's participation at the PUC on the following issues: the Energy Strategy, the Otay Mesa Power Purchase Agreement Transmission Project (including Bay Front Transmission line undergrounding), the Municipal Energy Utility Study, Study Peer Review, Community Choice Aggregation Implementation Rules, Support of the Statewide Local Government CCA Coalition, Opposing Electricity Rate Increases, Negotiations with SDG&E, Technical Review of SDG&E revenues/rates, and $218,000 for Energy Division Staff that has not been hired as of this report. Staff projects that this appropriation will fund these projects at least through this fiscal year, and staff will continue to stretch the use of these funds by sharing costs with other local governments and focusing costs on the projects most critical to the City's goals before the PUC. FISCAL IMPACTS: The City Council's approval of Staff's recommendation will require an appropriation from the available fund balance of the General Fund to the Conservation & Environmental Services Department in the amount of $50,000 to continue the work before the CPUC on electricity transmission line under-grounding and Phase II of Community Choice Aggregation. That would bring the City's total appropriation for Energy Strategy and SDG&E Negotiations to approximately $1,420,000 since 2000. Mtm:mud/budgeUcca-cas-aprop-3-24-05 10-4 RESOLUTION NO. 2005- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $50,000 FOR PARTICIPATING AT THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION; FOR PHASE II DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION, AND THE OTAY MESA TRANSMISSION PROJECT FROM THE AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND TO THE CONSERVATION & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT THEREFOR. WHEREAS, Phase I of the CCA concluded in December 2004 by establishing a reasonable fiamework for applying the Cost Responsibility Surcharge (CRS) to future CCA's and a number of administrative issues; and WHEREAS the Administrative Law Judge for Phase II has committed to facilitating the process personally and has established a deliberate schedule of weekly workshops and hearings through May 2005 with the intent of presenting a decision to the CPUC for their action in June ofthis year; and WHEREAS, Phase II is expected to complete the development of regulations and tariffs for CCA implementation. Phase II will address a number of issues that potentially modify the interim CRS and establish potential tariffs that allow the Investor Owned Utility to recover any operating costs that may occur when CCA customers are established. WHEREAS, approximately $25,000 of the funding will support the City's participation on CCA issues at the CPUC at least though June 30, 2005 when the majority of activity for this project is scheduled to occur; and WHEREAS, staff is also actively involved at the CPUC on the Otay Mesa Transmission Project; and WHEREAS, the CPUC is actively reviewing the Draft EIR and other documents on this proj ect; and WHEREAS, staffs involvement in this project is consistent MOU and critical to the future undergrounding of the transmission lines along the bayfiont; and WHEREAS, approximately $25,000 of this request will go to fund these continuing efforts; and 10-5 WHEREAS, staff estimates that this funding request will cover the projected costs for participating at the CPUC on transmission issues, and continued work with local goverrunents throughout the state, the CPUC and Investor Owned Utilities on Phase II of CCA at least through June 30, 2005 WHEREAS, staff will include any additional costs of completing the development of CCA rules at the CPUC and developing and submitting the CCA implementation plan to the CPUC in the 2005-06-budget cycle. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of City of Chula Vista does hereby appropriating $50,000 for participating at the CPUC regarding Phase II development of CCA (approximately $25,000), and the Otay Mesa Transmission Project (approximately $25,000) fiom the available fund balance of the general fund to the Conservation & Environmental Services Department therefor. Presented by Approved as to form by Michael Meacham Director of Conservation and Environmental Services ~¡íj1W City Attorney ~ l:fattomey/resolfinance/cpuc phase II 10-6 ---....--.-------------.-.--------------.--------.----- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item / I Meeting Date April 5, 2005 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Regarding the Proposed Assessment of Certain Delinquent Solid Waste Service Charges as Liens Upon the Respective Parcels of Land and Placement of Delinquent Charges on the Next Regular Tax Bill for Collection REVIEWED BY: RESOLUTION No. Assessing Delinquent Solid Waste Service Charges as Liens Upon the Respective Parcels of Land and Approving Placement of Delinquent Charges on the Next Regular Tax Bill Director of FinancefTr~~~ City ManageÞ (4/5ths Vote: Yes _NoL) SUBMITTED BY: In order to adequately protect the City's interest in delinquent solid waste service charges and ensure that collection efforts are directed towards the responsible property owner in the event of a change of ownership, staff is recommending approval for liens against affected properties as a preliminary action to placing the delinquencies on the property tax rolls if they remain unpaid. Adoption of this resolution will enhance the collection process for delinquent solid waste service charges by reducing the amount of uncollectible losses and ensure that payment will be received on a more timely basis. This is the identical process approved by City Council on a regular basis since mid- 2001. RECOMMENDATION: That Council open the public hearing to consider assessing delinquent solid waste service charges as liens on the affected properties, consider all testimony, and adopt the resolution overruling all protests and assessing these charges as liens upon the respective parcels of land. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: In November 1998, City Council amended Municipal Code Section 8.24 to eliminate suspension of solid waste service for nonpayment. To ensure that all residents pay their fair share of the costs of this program, the ordinance allows delinquent solid waste service charges to be assessed as liens upon the affected properties and ultimately placed on the property tax bills for collection. The ordinance states that upon notification of the property owners, a public hearing is set for solid waste service accounts that are over ninety days delinquent. At the hearing the City Council considers the delinquent accounts together with any objections or protests by interested parties. At the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council, may either approve the delinque'ncy and amount owed on the accounts as 11-1 Page 2, Item_ I , Meeting Date April 5, 2005 submitted or as modified or corrected by the City Council. Lastly, the City Council adopts a resolution assessing such amounts as liens upon the respective parcels of land, and the amounts are charged to the property owners on the next regular property tax bill. As these amounts are collected, the monies are remitted to Pacific Waste Services less the City's Franchise Fees, AB939 fees and late charges. Because charges can only be submitted for placement on the property tax bills once a year in August, staff is recommending assessing liens on the affected properties midyear as to better ensure the City's chances for collection. If the City were to address these delinquent charges only once a year in August, the effectiveness of using the property tax bill as a means of collection would be significantly reduced as the owners of record in August would not necessarily be the people responsible for the delinquent charges. In cases where properties are sold or transferred, assessing liens midyear holds the correct parties responsible for the delinquent charges. In cases where property owners choose to refinance their mortgages, the midyear liens will ensure the City receiving payment in a more timely manner as the delinquent charges would be paid through escrow during the refinancing process. In November 2004, City Council approved 187 delinquent accounts valued at $23,700 to be placed on the property tax bills for collection. Since then, Pacific Waste Services has identified and submitted an additional 1,267 delinquent accounts valued at over $155,000 to the city for collection. Through the City's preliminary collection efforts, 699 accounts have been resolved, and the remaining 568 accounts valued at $75,500 are now being submitted (listing available at the City Clerk's office). The account status and property ownership on these accounts have been verified by both Pacific Waste and City staff. Many of these delinquent accounts have gone through the lien process before as they continue to remain unpaid. These property owners were notified of their delinquencies through a series of past due notices sent by Pacific Waste until they were ultimately submitted to the City for collection. City staff also sent out a past due letter, and last month, these property owners were notified of the public hearing and were asked to pay their delinquent solid waste service charges prior to the hearing date to avoid a lien being placed on their property. City staff has been working with Pacific Waste to resolve any customer disputes as they arise and payment arrangements have been set up as needed. Staff will continue to update this list as payments are received and accounts are cleared. A final list will be submitted to the City Council for consideration as soon as all payments are recorded. Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the final list of delinquent solid waste accounts as submitted, and that these charges be fOlWarded to the County and assessed as liens on the respective parcels of land and ultimately placed on the next regular tax bill for collection. 11-2 Page 3, Item_ Meeting Date April 5, 2005 I r FISCAL IMPACT: By using the property tax bill as the ultimate collection method for delinquent solid waste service charges, approximately $250,000 was collected in FY 03-04. The same amount is estimated for FY04-05. These funds are forwarded to Pacific Waste Services less the city's Franchise Fees, AB939 fees and late charges. The city should realize an estimated $20,000 in Franchise Fees, $5,000 in AB939 fees, and $165,000 in late charges for FY04-05. 11-3 RESOLUTION NO. 2005- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ASSESSING DELINQUENT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AS RECORDED LIENS UPON THE RESPECTIVE OWNER OCCUPIED PARCELS OF LAND AND APPROVING PLACEMENT OF DELINQUENT CHARGES ON THE NEXT REGULAR TAX BILL WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 13.14.150 allows for delinquent sewer service accounts to become a lien upon the affected property served and also charged to the property owner on the next regular tax bill as a special assessment; and WHEREAS, the ordinance states that upon notification of the property owners, a public hearing may be set for sewer service accounts which are over sixty (60) days delinquent at which time the City Council is to consider the accounts together with any objections or protests by interested parties; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may either approve the delinquency and amount owed on the accounts as submitted or as modified or corrected by the City Council; and WHEREAS, these property owners have been notified of their delinquencies, and of the public hearing, and asked to pay the delinquent sewer service charges prior to said hearing to avoid property liens; and WHEREAS, staff is recommending that the City Council approve the final listing of delinquent sewer service accounts as submitted and that these charges be forwarded to the County AssessorlRecorder/Clerk (hereinafter "County") for recordation as a lien and placement on the next regular tax bill for collection; and WHEREAS, the City Council held the required public hearing on April 5, 2005, and considered any and all protests and objections presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby: (1) overrule any and all protests or objections presented at the public hearing; and (2) approve, with respect to the delinquent account list presented by staff and on file in the office of the City Clerk, assessing delinquent sewer service charges as recorded liens upon the respective owner occupied parcels of land and the placement of such delinquent charges on the next corresponding regular tax bill, unless cleared prior to transmittal of the delinquent account list to the County. Presented by Approved as to form by ::i::>a.-- ? i-f-- Maria Kachadoorian Director of Finance Ann Moore City Attorney J:\attomey\reso\sewer\Sewer delinquencies 04 05 OS.doc 11-4 ~Jf? ::~--= ~-€:--~ - -- - CllY OF CHUlA VISTA Finance DeDartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address Parcel No Owner Nam Balance Due 3814 508 D' ST 5651922600 $119.29 3838 186 CYPRESS ST 5691420300 $109.91 6747 23 H' ST E 5743912000 $231.87 7594 2041 CLEARWATER PL 5952031500 $109.91 7971 461 HIDDEN VISTA DR 5921813300 $115.94 8052 837 SOUTHSHORE DR 5952930700 $109.91 14641 1686 GOTHAM ST 6421301000 $115.93 15520 153J'ST 5732801200 $109.91 15743 558 JEFFERSON AVE 5710721900 $109.91 16312 159 MADRONA ST 5691421100 $69.46 16576 1413 MAX AVE 6203400500 $119.02 16708 1372 TOBIAS DR 6193412900 $143.88 16897 886 GENEVIEVE AVE 5954703800 $109.18 17156 732 FIRST AVE 5733601500 $109.91 17427 1202 MONTEREY AVE 6200431800 $55.66 17855 1014 NEPTUNE DR 6391030600 $115.94 18983 70 PALOMAR ST E 6200710400 $37.81 19184 665 ROBERT AVE 5742610400 $115.94 19638 81 SIERRA WAY E 5750920700 $125.71 19746 240 TALUS ST 6241401500 $109.91 20092 1052 VISTA WAY 5752921000 $231.87 21601 463 CLARISS ST 6181830600 $109.91 22136 1122 ELM AVE 6191322000 $147.47 22144 1169-11711/2ELMAVE 6191910500 $289.72 22489 150 AMY ST 6192312300 $89.35 23345 488 EMERSON ST 6182401200 $263.47 23549 208 ZENITH ST 6232114000 $282.89 23608 573 VANCE ST 5672111400 $109.91 24509 207 ORLANDO ST E 6202720200 $49.91 26374 91 PALOMAR ST E 6202512800 $122.23 26620 1299 RAVEN AVE 6206513000 $109.91 28311 1408 OCALA CRT 6204900300 $115.93 29322 491 NANETTE ST 6393830600 $163.27 29553 1673 OLEANDER AVE 6242701000 $125.71 30336 467 SECOND AVE 5692510400 $14111 30406 1146 NAPA AVE 6396306500 $235.00 Page 1 of 13 ~~~ :- ~~ - ~~~~ ~~~~ CllY OF CHUlA VISTA Finance DeDartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address Parcel No Owner Nam Balance Due 31844 579 OVERLAND CRT 5943920500 $131.73 31847 140 ROSEMARY PL 5703121600 $115.94 31999 2118 WATERSIDE DR 5952935600 $109.91 32819 633 VIA ARMADO 5944336800 $163.27 33078 54 VISTA WAY 5661324500 $263.47 33615 1213 NOLAN AVE 6202060400 $109.91 33994 508 TAMARACK CRT 6242901900 $109.91 34093 244 L ST 5734901600 $109.91 34331 1664 OLEANDER AVE 6242700700 $109.91 34357 1020 CUYAMACA AVE 5753300500 $109.91 34810 13 CONNOLEY CIR 6233412200 $109.91 35122 250 SIERRA WAY 5734700600 $115.94 35581 849 FAIRWAY CRT 5735210800 $232.84 35645 198 CORTE HELENA A 5662911700 $160.06 35945 9 DATE AVE 5650901500 $115.94 36077 440 DEL MAR CRT 5684204400 $115.94 36327 1282 HELIX AVE 6202511400 $68.90 36350 1175 HILLTOP DR 5754911400 $294.95 36483 310 LEMIRE DR 6394601100 $256.19 36598 305 MONTCALM ST 6391301300 $109.91 36643 70 DAVIDSON ST 5690803500 $109.91 36760 79 OXFORD ST E 5755202500 $115.94 36829 202 PAISLEY ST E 6202930200 $125.71 36873 224 SAN MIGUEL DR 5734820300 $219.81 46803 1000 CALMA DR 6401620100 $115.93 46809 1283 CUYAMACA AVE 6202510500 $109.91 46841 99 SECOND AVE 5661030800 $141.44 47155 157 E OLYMPIA ST 6201811200 $109.91 47906 716 BAYLOR AVE 5943226100 $185.30 54053 990 VALENCIA CRT 6423204200 $115.94 55216 2304 SPANISH BAY RD 6430910900 $109.91 55549 182 CORTE HELENA A 5662911400 $137.76 55982 11931195 FIRST AVE 6192010600 $199.81 57233 165 GLENHAVEN WAY 6192502600 $219.81 57582 450 A B FLOWER ST 5652700100 $399.63 58670 615 WOODLAWN AVE 5711030200 $109.91 Paae 2 of 13 ~~f?- ~ ~=~~ CllY OF CHUlA VISTA Finance Denartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address Parcel No 58949 828 DOROTHY ST 6220715700 $109.91 60657 3303 AL VOCA ST 6291510100 $473.94 61262 3736 FESTIVAL CRT 6232905300 $251.41 61467 186 NAPLES ST E 5754810600 $115.94 61744 1505 BANNER AVE 6230902600 $130.84 62421 65 CASSELMAN PL 5661510400 $231.87 63425 670 J' ST E 6401010300 $109.91 65017 4083 OTAY VALLEY RD 6240532200 $20.29 65706 261 OXFORD ST 6192210500 $125.71 65906 109 FOURTH AVE 5661600300 $109.90 65979 127 FORTUNA ST 5751910800 $205.84 68029 139 MINOT AVE 5663306700 $109.91 68257 91 SAN MIGUEL DR E 5750910800 $109.91 68638 978 CHESTNUT CRT 6402220700 $115.94 68956 630 BEECH AVE 5720801200 $270.85 71637 101 SECOND AVE 5663005300 $141.44 71863 159 ANITA ST 6231613300 $160.32 72601 1302 VALENCIA LOOP 6423130500 $152.04 72981 782 AVENIDA SOLARIA 6403231700 $109.91 73337 625 J' ST 5711531200 $264.56 73480 1345 THERESA WAY 6200830200 $159.01 73650 731 CEDAR AVE 5722010100 $109.91 73670 1990 KENT ST 5951641200 $219.81 73838 1007 ACERO ST 5933601700 $131.80 74766 527 CAMINO ELEVADO 5942220900 $115.94 74879 3925 MAIN ST 6240510200 $109.91 75156 1075 LAGUNA SECA LO 5954301801 $240.11 76841 1571NKOPAH ST 5752711400 $109.91 77022 115 DEL MONTE AVE 6291410400 $125.71 78031 1285 SONOMA CRT 6206106900 $141.44 78593 522 PALOMAR ST 6182903800 $109.91 79130 227 PAISLEY ST E 6203011100 $109.91 79623 3110' ST 5660305400 $157.24 80841 99 OXFORD ST E 5755203100 $115.94 81055 260 CAMINO DEL CER 5931601000 $169.30 82218 695 CAZORLA AVE 6400222900 $235.21 Paae 3 of 13 ~{~ ~ ~~=~ CllY OF CHULA VISTA Finance DeDartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address Parcel No 83230 956 MONSERA TE AVE 5752710500 $109.91 84151 1384 MONSERATE AVE 6201220900 $115.94 84651 1980 GOTHAM ST 5951752100 $109.91 84726 2333 BEAR CREEK PL 6432001900 $209.81 84915 228 FIRST AVE 5690431000 $13174 84977 180 MONTGOMERY ST 6231624900 $59.54 85276 120 JACQUA ST 6222110400 $231.87 85302 195 NAPLES ST E 5754212400 $237 71 85363 15 CRESTA WAY 5702010200 $204.19 86260 205 MAUTO CRT 6243402400 $17178 87395 1975 VERSAILLES RD 5954500100 $115.42 87505 453 G' ST 5682631400 $109.91 87700 1022 CAMINO CALABA 6403515200 $25141 88130 237 SEA VALE ST 5660801000 $109.90 88349 344 KIMBALL TER 5660303600 $65.94 89481 1487 LOMA LN 6243500700 $115.94 90113 925 CAMINO DEL SOL 6404114800 $280.24 90227 1319 MELROSE AVE 6203020200 $53.03 90735 3968 B MAIN ST 6240212000 $219.81 91008 1027 NORMA CRT 6393141000 $125.71 91336 1078 SECOND AVE 6190812500 $178.69 92017 1194 DEL MAR AVE 6191711300 $115.94 92333 70 SHERWOOD ST 6233331100 $153.51 92436 982 AGUA TIBIA AVE 5752311800 $115.94 92517 178 SKI WAY 6192311300 $126.43 92535 1362 HARBOUR TOWN 6431804100 $89.34 92542 1683 JEREMY POINT C 6442024100 $109.91 92657 962 J' ST E 6402312000 $125.71 92675 301 RIENSTRA ST E 6204400200 $109.91 92801 429 ANITA ST 6231111400 $125.71 92843 1045 BARRETT AVE 5753030900 $121.97 92895 475 CLARISS ST 6181830400 $109.91 92996 2017 BRIDGEPORT DR 5952122000 $109.91 93046 279 D' ST 5660901700 $109.91 93094 400 DATE ST 6310110900 $154.05 93147 270 CALLE LA MIRADA 5932100400 $109.91 Page 4 of 13 ~(I?- :-~: ......-;:- - -- ~~~~ - ~~- CllY OF CHUlA VISfA Finance DeDartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address Parcel No 93177 932 HELIX AVE 5752000600 $109.91 93425 1104 SAGE VIEW CRT 6401801700 $115.94 93556 572 DOUGLAS ST 6395603700 $109.91 93770 178 KING ST 5732702100 $131.74 93797 622 CARLA AVE 5741711600 $134.55 93936 921 HILL TOP DR 5751710600 $85.37 93985 834 MADISON AVE 5712721300 $125.70 93998 144 JACQUA ST 6222110800 $109.90 94014 1535 JASPER AVE 6232802100 $219.81 94072 1024 LAGUNA SECA LO 5954301705 $109.91 94363 843 RIVERLAWN AVE 5712820900 $209.19 94390 724 WOODLAWN AVE 5711821400 $109.90 94479 239 MONTGOMERY ST 6232112900 $115.94 94964 829 OAKLA WN AVE 5712710600 $119.06 94969 11730CALAAVE 6394110600 $14145 94973 1139 OCELOT AVE 6393831200 $109.91 95118 311 SANDSTONE CRT 6241001500 $109.91 95295 817 SECOND AVE 5735000400 $178.69 95300 440 SEQUOIA CRT 6242500700 $109.91 95443 14 TOURMALINE ST 6232904900 $60.76 95717 12551257 SECOND AV 6192501100 $169.55 96111 1108 NACION AVE 6396300400 $219.81 96262 16 EL CAPITAN DR 5750500200 $131.61 96330 1085 WOODLAWN AVE 6181310900 $115.94 96370 2017 CHARDONNAY TE 5951920800 $109.91 97515 350 CAMINO ELEVADO 5931500900 $115.94 98188 261 261 1/2263 DEL MA 5681630400 $579.44 98564 1962 ALDERBROOK PL 5952153100 $219.81 98951 997 CORDOVA DR 6403803400 $109.91 99385 681 EL PORTAL DR 5955904100 $109.91 99428 608 WESTVIEW CRT 5922314600 $263.47 99429 410 ORSETT ST 6184100400 $109.91 99491 581 VIA ARMADO 5944305000 $219.81 99958 980 CAMINO DEL SOL 6404112000 $168.90 99974 574 VANCE ST 5672120700 $115.94 100454 1261 CAMINO CATALO 6420110300 $235.00 Pa~e5of 13 ~ ~ f?. =~~_: ~"'€:"-::-= --- ~~ CllY OF CHUlA VISTA Finance DeDartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Add ress ParcelNo Owner Nam Balance Due 100719 1613 COLUSA ST 6424821800 $125.71 100969 1272 JOSSELYN AVE 6202513300 $222.94 102254 717 PASEO DEL REY 6401521000 $79.94 102502 2116 D NORTHSHORE 5952220148 $109.91 102523 418 WEISSER WAY 6182303900 $115.93 102569 341 L'ST 5734503900 $219.81 102773 374 CAMINO ELEVADO 5932920700 $219.81 102867 1082 VIA MI RALESTE 6403511400 $89.35 103097 1172 AGUA TIBIA AVE 5754910400 $109.91 103753 6 CON NO LEY CIR 6233425700 $130.21 104312 194 HALSEY ST 5732101200 $243.93 104627 725 GARRETT AVE 5733030500 $219.81 106368 616 PORT DUNBAR 5952710800 $231.87 106520 1074 OAKLAWN AVE 6181311900 $109.91 106627 898 MELROSE AVE 6390730500 $82.17 106787 1449 NOLAN CRT 6204301600 $109.91 107650 108 HENRY LN 6192321800 $109.91 108223 1278 SECOND AVE 6192220900 $119.54 108490 972 CAMINITO ESTREL 6403302701 $109.91 108561 564 F' ST 5671013700 $68.90 108580 1384 INDIAN CREEK PL 6432510900 $109.90 108651 1661 H' ST E 6422000300 $109.91 110624 246 OXFORD ST 6191721200 $109.91 111870 198 ANITA ST 6230904500 $163.27 112001 403 ANITA JUNE CRT 6183204600 $141.44 112205 318 NOCTURNE CRT 6204702400 $157.24 112511 301 SANDSTONE CRT 6241001300 $109.91 112659 2257 GREEN RIVER DR 6431900200 $109.91 113895 1425 PERKINS DR 6411325100 $109.91 114064 540 MARl POSA ST 6396503300 $109.91 114274 722 A MADISON AVE 5711931400 $109.91 114651 501 KILEY RD 5922114100 $115.93 114676 638 CLAIRE AVE 5741911000 $219.81 115672 238 PAISLEY ST E 6203030300 $125.71 115689 543 REAR OTIS ST 5672503200 $109.91 115725 580 DAVENPORT LN 6410915100 $115.94 PaQe60f 13 ~~~ =~-_: ~~~E CllY OF CHUIA VISTA Finance DeDartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address ParcelNo Owner Nam Balance Due 115952 787 A JEFFERSON AVE 5712330800 $109.91 116472 1463 EWI NG DR 6411303500 $109.91 116682 2457 PONTE VEDRA W 6432502900 $115.94 116939 369 QUINTARD ST 6230400200 $157.24 117050 327 TWIN OAKS AVE 5683322000 $109.91 117275 217 G' ST 5683531400 $109.91 117468 52 PALOMAR ST 6194001700 $125.58 118084 2340 E GREENBRIAR D 5953212856 $133.87 118421 622 MARIPOSA CIR 6396823200 $109.90 118681 2235 ROLLING RIDGE 5954000800 $125.71 118688 4 HILL TOP CRT 5752911600 $115.93 119079 787 B JEFFERSON AVE 5712330800 $113.46 119332 1400 MONTERA ST 6426804200 $219.81 119720 1103 DIXON DR 6191520100 $89.35 120820 801 J STREET 6402210800 $122.09 120931 311 FIRST AVE 5691710700 $112.99 121354 2027 MOUNT LANGLEY 6433301900 $136.23 121644 1324 CARNEROS VALL 6426811900 $114.91 121892 1543 POINT DUME CRT 6442214200 $109.91 121922 772 B MADISON AVE 5712331600 $326.55 122213 727 MARBELLA CIR 5941218300 $219.81 122281 2655 FERN VALLEY RD 6433122200 $115.93 122308 373 CAMINO ELEVADO 5932923700 $125.71 122636 820 HUMPHREY PL 6411443100 $13173 122680 1790 CLOVER TREE C 6425203600 $14145 123255 543 BERLAND WAY 6391920900 $109.91 123367 2460 LA COST A AVE 5953215305 $115.94 123891 83 PROSPECT ST E 6200731400 $59.91 124213 2046-4 AZURE COVE 6433802028 $109.90 124318 1349-2 SERENA CIR 6423801701 $109.91 124708 332 TURQUOISE CRT 6241702000 $109.91 124723 608 DATE AVE 5720900300 $109.91 124779 552 DOUGLAS ST 6395603300 $169.53 125027 1191 NOLAN AVE 6202010200 $106.31 125356 2235 SUN VALLEY RD 6431803100 $109.90 125633 1410 PLUMAS PINES P 6432306100 $219.81 PaQe70f 13 ~ ~ f?. ~ .......-.::....-:...-- ~-~~ CllY OF CHUIA VISTA Finance Denartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address ParcelNo 125884 1093 MISTY CREEK ST 6411706300 $13174 126264 1230 NEPTUNE DR 6202240600 $219.81 126625 2390 GRAND FORKS R 6432333600 $125.71 127358 1500-59 THIRD AVE 7762303359 $217.88 127408 1500-75 THIRD AVE 7762303375 $139.53 127433 1500-88 THIRD AVE 7762303388 $308.95 127434 1500-89 THIRD AVE 7762303389 $89.35 127622 1548 A APACHE DR 6423703200 $129.91 127651 1302 PINNACLE PEAK 6433700423 $89.35 127988 2324 LAGO VENTANA 5954102811 $109.91 128230 2191 CABO BAHIA 5954200909 $178.69 128728 541 OTIS ST 5672503200 $226.07 128804 1625 YALE ST 6421803200 $13174 129049 1713 VALLEY BEND ST 6426503600 $147.27 129237 1367-6 CAMINITO CAPI 6420803206 $109.91 129274 1866 KNIGHTS FERRY 6434001800 $109.91 129550 132 PROSPECT ST 6193600300 $166.35 129866 898 MARIA WAY 6390720500 $135.94 130923 1003 HILLTOP DR 5752311100 $219.99 131393 1080 TORREY PINES R 5953214810 $89.35 131573 1370 WEAVERVILLE ST 6426613200 $300.52 132492 1949 KNIGHTS FERRY 6434100900 $109.91 133053 1452 MAX AVE 6203203000 $161.01 133375 816 A COLORADO AVE 5712610400 $119.41 133407 622 ELDER AVE 5721011400 $109.91 133408 347 DEL MAR AVE 5683312000 $224.81 134071 168 MANKA TO ST 5693620400 $251.41 134466 570 GARRETT AVE 5730820600 $109.91 135225 25 SIERRA WAY 5750331700 $84.06 135551 473 WESTBY ST 6180706700 $14144 136467 1250 RAVEN AVE 6206030600 $90.71 137442 829 DALE CRT 6395201100 $179.92 137452 872 ADA ST 6220121600 $282.89 137584 140 OAKLA WN AVE 5651511500 $119.69 137650 1575-187 MENDOCINO 6192908400 $125.71 137677 1454 AUTUMN HILLS D 6412712100 $244.45 Pa~e8of 13 ~~~ ~ ~~5"~ CllY OF CHUIA VISTA Finance Denartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address ParcelNo 137983 1205 KING CREEK WA 6433901800 $115.93 138070 259 ONEIDA ST E 6200430900 $295.98 138202 966 SURREY DR 5933111600 $109.91 138602 768 MONSERATE AVE 5743610400 $117.27 140537 2558 GARNET PEAK R 6433700216 $109.65 141211 566 MCINTOSH ST 5650800900 $73.05 141344 921 BRYCE CANYON A 5957636200 $146.00 141437 1168 B FIRST AVE 6191921900 $125.71 141539 1575 CUMBRE VIEW 5943920400 $109.91 141841 2077 CHATEAU CRT 5956201900 $109.91 142557 1146 DEL MAR AVE 6191511500 $129.90 142563 1544 AVENIDA ROSA 6230301134 $219.81 142574 918 CEDAR AVE 6180510300 $251.41 142817 139 LEOMA LN 6192323200 $125.71 142836 1802 VIA CAPRI 6425501504 $89.35 143233 1321 MONUMENT TRAI 6433700302 $89.35 143560 168 CARVER ST 6230824800 $82.06 143702 2022 BRIDGEPORT DR 5952130100 $90.28 143759 827 CAMI NITO ESTREL 6403301201 $109.91 144691 2071-3 BARBADOS CO 6433801127 $251.41 144782 1716 MENDOTA ST 6425108500 $263.47 144804 1278 FINCH PL 6206010400 $219.81 145278 1524 LA CHICA DR 6411433600 $221.87 145926 1504 PRESCOTT DR 6435205118 $109.41 146259 571 C GLOVER AVE 5730820500 $125.71 147214 1472 EDGEHILL DR 6435414700 $237.93 147398 2467 GOLF CREST LOO 5953710300 $294.95 147726 1455 SUTTER BUTTES 6435902700 $188.44 148332 2184 CORTE SAN SIME 5958100600 $143.50 148338 2173 CORTE SAN SIME 5958101100 $143.50 148451 165JAMULAVE 5753611600 $135.97 148578 2573 HIGH TRAIL CRT 5957262100 $13173 148590 199 A SECOND AVE 5662513400 $232.32 149346 1342 FIELDBROOK ST 6426703400 $115.94 149371 458 CHERRY HILLS LN 5943830800 $287.66 149977 2078 MIRROR LAKE PL 6433521000 $109.91 Pa~e9of 13 ~~f? :-~: ----~ ;€;~~~ CllY OF CHUlA VISTA Finance DeDartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address ParcelNo 150035 2195 LAGO MADERO 5954100302 $109.91 150118 439 A FOURTH AVE 5684110301 $123.77 150283 722 B MADISON AVE 5711931400 $125.71 150392 354 A MOSS ST 6190101400 $109.91 150517 772 B JEFFERSON AVE 5712321600 $125.71 150615 230 ZENITH ST 6232114400 $109.91 150707 1142-3 LATIGO COVE 6433801210 $104.98 150931 1456 APPALACHIAN PL 6433102900 $101.21 150963 889 BUENA VISTA WAY 6422725100 $125.71 151248 247 FIFTH AVE 0 $124.91 151320 721 B EDGEWA TER DR 5952220373 $109.91 151472 997 RED GRANITE RD 6412500800 $125.71 151775 1261 MELROSE AVE 6202100300 $109.91 152110 636 FOURTH AVE 5721223200 $135.94 152188 1759 VIA CAPRI 6425500906 $129.33 152270 401 CAMINO ELEVADO 5942210100 $116.07 152344 1565-174 MENDOCINO 6441111300 $20.45 152411 1516 PRESCOTT DR 6435205115 $219.81 152413 790 HAWKSVIEW PL 5957321700 $219.45 152552 1272 DIXON WAY 6192702900 $136.99 152630 2236 LAGO VENT ANA 5954102405 $98.15 152684 684 FIFTH AVE 5721501000 $122.53 152773 1235 DAWSON DR 6411903000 $109.91 153437 2624 TABLE ROCK AVE 6420111200 $115.94 153484 1365-1 SERENA CIR 6423800610 $278.86 153495 1113 MAJESTAD LN 5931431400 $153.61 153551 528 BA YONA LOOP 6400312700 $88.06 153556 827 FOURTH AVE 5734300100 $342.46 153824 1409 OLEANDER AVE 6205004800 $125.71 154090 1203 TURTLE CAY PL 6431303200 $133.00 154097 2298 POPPY HILLS DR 6432313900 $109.91 154211 1255 ELM AVE 6192504800 $131.74 154228 218 FIRST AVE 5690430800 $169.43 154521 74 EMERSON ST E 5755000100 $218.40 154540 1123 OSAGE AVE 6393701600 $383.80 154634 1073 CAMINO CALABA 6403505800 $109.91 Page100f 13 ~~f?- =~-_: ~~~=F" CllY OF CHULA VISTA Finance DeDartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address ParcelNo Owner Nam Balance Due 154734 1426 ANTIOCH AVE 6426233600 $234.25 154753 1168 SANTA MADERA 6426323100 $143.50 154764 1752 VIA CAPRI 6425501401 $230.76 154788 1870 SHEEP RANCH L 6434505900 $109.91 154794 1205 ATWATER ST 6426213100 $259.60 154795 1433 OAKPOINT AVE 6435420400 $247.27 1 54905 3340 AL VOCA ST 6291520100 $156.29 155059 798-3 CAMINITO FRAN 6420802909 $117.37 155076 101 J' ST E 5742611200 $272.71 155223 168 FIFTH AVE 5652501300 $230.45 155302 2251 GROVE PARK PL 6431811100 $251.41 155348 598 NANTUCKET DR 6410921900 $221.80 155445 1101-2 LATIGO COVE 6433801322 $219.11 155451 2116 B NORTHSHORE 5952220150 $219.11 155501 576 B PARK WAY 5671400600 $218.12 155699 1289 AGUIRRE DR 6404300805 $88.53 155773 1251 TOBIAS DR 6192621000 $250.08 155803 1954 PARKER MOUNTA 6435301900 $228.27 155835 1629 MARL AVE 6241502000 $251.58 155918 1305 LA CRESCENTIA 5944328500 $219.81 156167 700 MARBELLA CIR 5941214200 $128.52 156183 621 FOURTH AVE 5731403500 $143.76 156187 755-4 CAMINITO OBISP 6420803609 $179.82 156599 1362-4 CAMINITO CAP I 6420803216 $97.02 156651 1220 PINEHURST RD 6431102500 $146.65 156729 485 HILL TOP DR 0 $141.00 156830 1380 SUTTER BUTTES 6436000200 $133.90 156839 2452 GOLFCREST LOO 5953713100 $88.04 157005 368 PLAZA LOS OSOS 5957810300 $144.72 18023 1034 NORMA CRT 6393140800 $152.70 18407 236 ONEIDA ST E 6202101700 $39.35 19598 235 SHASTA ST 5730710600 $126.Q7 21058 96 SHERWOOD ST 6233330200 $109.91 95280 620 WATERTOWN LN 5952422800 $89.35 95461 53 BISHOP ST 6233311700 $109.91 95581 70 SUZANNE LN 6233142100 $68.90 Paae11 of 13 ~~f?- =-~::: ~5~~ CllY OF CHUlA VISTA Finance Deoartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address Parcel No Owner Nam Balance Due 99734 1020 C BAYWOOD CIR 5953216316 $109.91 104039 1655 OCALA AVE 6243201300 $125.21 107339 1731 LONG RIDGE ST 6425107300 $140.17 113388 816 A B RIVERLAWN A 5712811700 $211.87 115073 696 ROCKING HORSE 5955407800 $115.94 124005 33 MOSS ST 5752220600 $115.94 125631 1450 TABER DR 6412015100 $13174 127018 375 VANCE ST 5684104500 $61.80 127850 2234 LAGO VENT ANA 5954102413 $109.91 129807 1954 KNIGHTS FERRY 6434104800 $109.91 131179 1205 STEINER DR 6411901500 $109.91 133263 1930 KNIGHTS FERRY 6434105200 $131.74 133981 1212 CHIMNEY FLATS 6432910800 $92.69 135627 492 THRUSH ST 6206020500 $146.96 137423 826 CEDARBEND WAY 6402004900 $109.91 139790 1244 CALLE CANDELE 6423142300 $80.09 140541 1065 LAGUNA SECA LO 5954301807 $109.91 140854 120 NAPLES ST E 5754700500 $131.74 142746 2425 RIVIERA DR 6432110500 $95.29 144893 241 QUINTARD ST E 6203501200 $110.93 147888 433 QUEEN ANNE DR 6182601000 $125.83 149768 791 CEDAR AVE 5722210500 $109.91 150084 773 ASH AVE 5722130200 $109.91 150585 527 PATRICIA AVE 5693420600 $115.94 153990 1201 MISSION AVE 6205700800 $115.94 29792 1383 RAVEN AVE 6206523700 $125.71 29959 946 NACION AVE 6394421500 $161.64 34382 229 EMERSON ST E 6393910300 $109.54 34587 166 K' ST 5735001200 $109.72 35039 388 MOSS ST E 6395103300 $161.45 35813 17 CRESTA WAY 5702010100 $109.91 58045 60 PAISLEY ST E 6200221100 $108.18 66298 514 OTIS ST 5672500800 $115.94 68584 577 DAVIDSON ST 5670421000 $148.22 69817 1370 MOUNTAIN VIEW 6205902600 $180.09 75924 284 WHITNEY ST 5730630400 $146.09 PaRe 12 of 13 ~ {f?. ~ ---~ ~ ~~~~ - - -- - - -~ CllY OF CHULA VISTA Finance DeDartment Collections Unit Accounts With Notice Of Public Hearing Sent March 29, 2005 Account Site Address ParcelNo Owner Nam Balance Due 76930 932 CAMINITO ESTREL 6403302404 $109.91 94722 689 MYRA AVE 6391820800 $109.91 154417 1547 OLIVE AVE 6242402100 $129.84 154887 597 CANYON DR 5943932800 $115.94 155127 1239 CALlSTOGA AVE 6424502100 $159.59 155162 1204 POSITAS RD 5944331900 $14144 157363 1185 PLAZA AMPARAD 6403515600 $170.59 157645 554 MADISON AVE 5710800900 $156.73 158157 35 FLOWER ST 5703111000 $125.40 158304 1077 CAMINO DEL SOL 6404218200 $211.51 158374 1470 OLD JANAL RANC 6435042500 $90.17 158473 270 L' ST 5734902000 $167.89 158615 119 FIFTH AVE 5652012000 $122.45 158923 820-8 COLORADO AVE 5712610500 $140.39 159617 1527 CORDELIA ST 6425302000 $132.83 159668 731 A EDGEWATER DR 5952220370 $112.99 159702 1520 OCALA AVE 6242301900 $158.91 159779 1931 WHEATVILLE ST 6434313700 $158.92 160112 1268 LONG VIEW DR 6435013100 $129.52 160245 557 VANCE ST 5672111000 $12803 160258 143 OAKLA WN AVE 5651521200 $109.91 No Of Accounts 453 Total Due: $66,038.83 PaQe130f 13 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item: ¡:¿ , Meeting Date: 04/5/05 ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION: Resolution of the City Council of the City ofChula Vista approving Conditional Use P=it PCC-05-022 to conduct a Farmers' Market on the campus of Southwestern College at 900 Otay Lakes Road, Chula Vista. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning and BUilding~ CityManager~ ~<1'""' 1)' (4/5 Vote: Yes_No..xJ REVIEWED BY: The Applicant, Mr. David Larson, is requesting p=ission to conduct a weekly Certified Farmers' Market on the campus of Southwestern College at 900 Otay Lakes Road (see Locator). The project wiUconsist of the establishment of a market to be held every Saturday morning in lot "0" of Southwestern College and involving approximately 45 vendors, 25 of which will be certified agricultural producers. Also proposed are the installation of porta-potties with hand wash facilities, live music and children's activities such as pony rides and face painting. The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed project qualifies for a Class 1 categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of ' the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus no further environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution PCC-05-022; recommending that the City Council approve the proposed establishment of a once-weekly Farmers' Market on the campus of Southwestern College, subject to the [mdings and conditions contained in the attached draft City Council Resolution. BOARDS AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: On March 16, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the proposed project. Following staffs presentation and public testimony, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 recommending that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit. 12-1 Page No.2, Item: /3 Meetin¡t Date: 4/05/2005 DISCUSSION: 1. Project Background In accordance with Section 19.58.148 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the City Council, subsequent to its receipt of recommendations thereon fiom the Planning Commission, is required to approve a Conditional Use Permit in order for a Farmers' Market to operate. This Community College is located in the middle of a large residential area, with the exception of small shopping venues located on the east side of Otay Lakes Road and the north side of East H Street. The area proposed for this Farmers' Market is the northeast area ofthe campus, closest to the intersection of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road. Because City staff had concerns that a Farmers' Market in this location might present an imposition to residents in the area, it was requested that the applicant notify neighbors within a distance of one thousand feet of this location. Two calls were received almost immediately fiom neighbors who expressed serious misgivings about the market. When no further calls were received, staff scheduled this application for a hearing before the Planning Commission. At the Planning Commission hearing the applicant made a statement, which was then followed by statements fiom six people associated with Southwestern College, all of whom were very positive regarding the potential location of this market. No concerned neighbors requested the right to address the Planning Commission, and thus they have recommended approval the request. 2. Project Site Setting The project is located in the Single Family Residential (R-1) zone, and has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Low-Medium Residential (RLM). 3. General Plan Land Use and Zoning General Plan Zoning Current Land Use Site: North: South: East: West: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Central Commercial Single Family Residential R-I R-I P-C C-C P-C College College overflow parking Single Family Residences Shopping Center Single Family Residential 12-2 Page No.3, Item: /3 Meetinl: Date: 4/05/2005 4. Project Description The Project proposes to operate a Farmers' Market every Saturday morning fiom 8:30 a.m. to 1 :00 p.m., regardless of weather conditions, on the campus of Southwestern College, occupying the parking lot in the northeast area of the site. The application states that a rental fee fiom the market will benefit Southwestern College and the intent is to provide up to forty-five vendors, twenty-five of which will be Certified Agricultural Producers. Another twelve vendors will merchandise prepared foods and an additional eight are anticipated to be arts and crafts suppliers. Live music will be performed at a relatively low volume with little or no amplification, and there will be children's activities, which may include pony or llama rides, an air jump and face painting. The applicant plans to begin operations in April of2005. 5. Project Data Table Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 642-020-28-00 Current Zoning: R-1 Land Use Designation: Public/Quasi Public 6. Staff Analysis The site plan indicates that the market is a relatively small endeavor, when compared to the size of the college campus. On Saturday mornings there is unlikely to be any limitation on the amount of available parking, since few students are likely to be on campus, and the activity is reasonably-well removed fiom both neighboring businesses and residences. Traffic associated with this Farmers' Market will not exceed the amount usually associated with the college campus, although staff concedes that it may be more active and intense due to the relatively short time a shopper might be present at the market. The establishment of a farmers' market at this location will provide an increased amount of necessary and desirable service to the residents and businesses ofChula Vista. Farmers' markets are a proven "sustainable" agricultural and consumer practice. "Sustainability" is an enormous public policy advantage to the community. Another advantage is that these markets become a place to meet fiiends and neighbors, thereby building community. They have been found to help local retailers thrive in locations where markets exist, since people will come out to shop and combine trips. It has been stated by the applicant that the majority of the produce is of a variety and fieshness not typically available in retail stores. Local growers tend to practice organic farming, resulting in fewer pesticides and fertilizers that cause pollution. Local Farmers' Markets are a method of reducing environmental costs by avoiding the price of transport of agricultural products fiom further away, common when shopping at chain grocery stores. The structures will be entirely 12-3 Page No.4, Item: 13 Meetin2 Date: 4/05/2005 t=porary on this site and an adequate effort has been made to limit the potential effects on passers-by and neighbors of the property. Certified Farmers' Markets Development Standards (Chapter 19.58) "Certified farmers' market" means a retail sales operation, generally outdoors, selling predominantly fiesh produce and/or flowers which is subject to the certification regulations of the State of California Department of Agriculture, Weights and Measures, and the County of San Diego's Department of Environmental Health. This market meets the above criteria, selling predominantly fresh produce and being subject to the certification regulations listed above. Operational requirements for Certified Farmers' Markets (CVMC 19.58.148) A certified farmers' market shall operate under the folowing rules: A. Operational requirements: 1. A farmers' market shall operate no more than once a week, with the day and hours of operation established by the conditional use permit. This market is proposed to operate on Saturday mornings from 8.30 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. 2. The sales area shall maintain a 25- foot setback fiom the street. The sales area maintains the required setback. 3. The market shall be located on a paved surface, except for areas used for animal rides. The market will be located on the paved parking lot surface. . 4. The sales area shall be kept in a neat and well-kept manner at all times. The operator has specifically agreed to keeping the sales area in a neat and well-kept manner. B. Signs. The operator of a farmers' market shall obtain approval of a planned sign program for all signs. The development and approval of the planned sign program shall comply with the provisions ofCVMC 19.60.050 and the following: . 12-4 Page No.5, Item: 1'3 Meetin!: Date: 4/05/2005 1. Temporary signs, whether a part of or not part of the planned sign program, identifying the farmers' market and hours thereof may only be displayed during the event, and not more than four (4) hours before and one (1) hour after said event. 2. Pennants may be used only for safety and precautionary purposes. 3. Price signs may be used only when of a size and location as to benefit the pedestrian shopper and not passing vehicles. The signs proposed for this market are entirely within the requirements of the ordinance quoted above. C. Required conditions. The conditional use permit shall include requirements of standards for live animals, live entertainment or rides, on-and off-site security and traffic control, emergency access provisions, restrooms, waste management and recycling. The initial term of a certified farmers' market use permit shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Ail requirements listed above have been met and/or standards for their provision have been specified. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be for a period not to exceed one year. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant has paid for all costs associated with the processing of this application, and it is not anticipated that additional costs will be incurred by the City. CONCLUSION Based on the preceding information, staffis ofthe opinion that the project meets the requirements for the establishment of a Certofied Farmers' Market and that the City Council can approve this Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions listed in the attached City Council Resolution. Attachments: 1. Locator Map 2. PC Resolution 3. Disclosure Statement J:IPlanninglAnnlPCClAgenda StatementsIPCC-OS-022.Agenda Stmt2 12-5 Project Location C HULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DE PARTM E NT LOCATOR PROJECT Southwestern College Open Air PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C) APPLICANT: Farmers Market & Bazaar CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROJECT 900 Otay Lakes Road ADDRESS: Request: Proposal for an open air Farmers Market & Bazaar at Southwestern College on Saturdays from 8:30 am to 1 :00 pm. SCALE: FILE NUMBER: NORTH No Scale PCC-05-022 J:\planning\carlos\locators\pcc05022.cdr 12.22.04 RESOLUTION NO. PCC-OS-22 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AND IMPOSE CONDmONS ON A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-OS-022 TO CONDUCT A FARMERS' MARKET ON THE CAMPUS OF SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE AT 900 OTA Y LAKES ROAD - DAVID LARSON WHEREAS, on November 15, 2004 a duly verified application for a Conditional Use P=it (pCC-05-022) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department on behalf of David Larson ("Applicant"); and WHEREAS, said application requests permission to conduct a Farmers' Market consisting of 45 vendors, 25 of which will be Certified Agricultural Producers on the campus of Southwestern College on the Project Site ("Project''); and WHEREAS, the area ofland owned by Southwestern College is the subject matter of this resolution, and is represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and for the purpose of general description is approximately 3.5 acres of property on the northeastern comer of the overall Southwestern College site at 900 Otay Lakes Road, with a land use designation of Residential Low/Medium (RLM) and a zone of Single Family Residential (R-l) ("Project Site"); and WHEREAS, Certified Farmers' Markets require that a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) shall be approved by the City Council subsequent to its receipt of recommendations thereon from the Planning Commission, pursuant to ChuIa Vista Municipal Code Section 19.54.020 and Section 19.58.148; and WHEREAS, such markets require that a CUP shall require a public hearing before the City of Chula Vista Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposal for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Project qualifies for a Class 1 categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines, thus no further environmental review is necessary; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does hereby find that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Coordinator was reached in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review Procedures ofthe City of Chula Vista. WHEREAS, the Planning and Building Director set the time and place for a hearing on said Conditional Use Permit and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the proj ect site at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and 12-7 Resolution PCC 05-022 Page 2 WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely March 16, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, after considering all reports, evidence, and testimony presented at said public hearing with respect to the Project, the Planning Commission voted recommending that the Conditional Use Permit be approved; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista does hereby recommend to the City Council that they approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the City Council and the Applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 16th day of March, 2005, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Cortes, Felber, Hom, Hall NOES: ABSENT: Madrid, O'Neill ABSTAIN: Marco Polo Cortes, Chair ATTEST: Diana Vargas, Secretary J:IPlanninglANN\PCClResolutionsIPCC05022.PCRESO.doc 12-8 ~II?- -.- . - -;: p I ann n g & Building Planning Division' Department Development Processing (flY OF (HULA VISTA APPLICATION APPENDIX B Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filed. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, appiicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. .?ijj~ðf;m {{)/i¿J1~ p.fi/iclUtro/J (¡¡¿Ill _ ___¡z~ IJ v ð'jtJ!7JZer 2. If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuais with a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity. 4//1J I If any person· identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit oroanization or trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. ijJ¿ ·a iI' r. /. lease Identify every perso ,including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to 'JJresent you before the City in this matter. ,/I" if I 3. 4. Has any person' associated with this contract had any financial dealing~)pth an official" of the City of Chula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. Yes_ No 5. If Yes, briefl,y describe the nature of the financial interest the official'· may have in this contract. /I/It I 6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? No ì1- Yes _If yes. which Council member? . 27"6 Fourth Avenue Ch ¡ \" t2-C9¡'f ' u.) Ista ¡ J I QrntJ 91910 {6191691-5101 ~\r~ -,- p :3 p I ann n g & Building Planning Division Department Development Processing em OF (HUlA VISTA APPLICATION APPENDIX B Disclosure Statement - Page 2 7. Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an official" of the City of Chula Vista in the past twelve ~ months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legal debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes _ No If Yes, which official" and what was the nature of item provided? Date: ~h/tJ~ Print or . Person is defined as:, any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, 'association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. .. Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a board, commission. or committee of the City, employee, or staff members. 276 Fourth Avenue 12-10 (hula \Î:ita ] CaiirorniJ 91910 (619) 691-5101 RESOLUTION NO. 2005- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-05-022 TO CONDUCT A FARMERS' MARKET ON THE CAMPUS OF SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE AT 900 OT A Y LAKES ROAD, CHULA VISTA (APPLICANT: DAVID LARSON) 1. RECITALS WHEREAS, on November 15; 2004 a duly verified application for a Conditional Use Permit (pCC-05-022) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department by David Larson ("Applicant") requesting permission to conduct a Farmers' Market consisting of 45 vendors, 25 of which will be Certified Agricultural Producers on the campus of Southwestern College on the Project Site ("Project"); and A. Proj ect Site WHEREAS, the area ofland owned by Southwestern College is the subject matter of this Resolution, and is represented in Exhibit "A", copies of which are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and for the purpose of general description is approximately 3.5 acres of property on the northeastern corner of the overall Southwestern College site at 900 Otay Lakes Road, with a land use designation of Residential Low/Medium (RLM) and a zone of Single Family Residential (R-1) (''Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on November 15, 2004, the Applicant filed an application with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a Certified Farmers' Market consisting of 45 vendors, 25 of which will be Certified Agricultural Producers on the campus of Southwestern College; and C. Prior Discretionary Approval and Recommendations WHEREAS, the application for a Conditional Use Permit has received the following discretionary approvals and recommendations: Planning Commission recommendation of approval of Conditional Use Permit PCC-05-022 to operate a Certified Farmers' Market on the campus ofSouthwesteffi College on March 16, 2005; and D. Planning Commission Record of Applications WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on March 16, 2005, and after hearing staff s presentation and public testimony voted 4-0- 2 to recommend that the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions listed below; and 1 2-11 Resolution No. 2005- Page 2 of 7 E. Council Record of Applications WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the public hearing on the Project's Conditional Use Permit application; and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, its mailing to property owners and tenants within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project, at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on April 5, 2005, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 6:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: II PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on the Project held on March 16, 2005, and the minutes and Resolution resulting therefiom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. III. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has determined that the proposed project qualifies for a Class I (Existing Facilities) categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus no further environmental review or documentation is necessary. IV. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL The City Council has exercised their independent review and judgment and concurs with the Environmental Review Coordinator's determination that the Project qualifies for a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. V. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby make the fmdings required by the City's rules and regulations for the issuance of Conditional Use Permits, as herein below set forth, and sets forth, thereunder, the evidentiary basis that permits the stated finding to be made. 12-12 Resolution No. 2005- Page 3 of7 1. That the proposed use at this location is necessary or desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the community. The proposed use at this location is necessary and desirable fiom the perspective that providing for the sale of fiesh produce and flowers to residents of this neighborhood is a positive feature which will contribute to the general well-being of both the neighborhood and the community at large. 2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare to the general public, or be injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The market will only operate on Saturdays, when the college is not in session and will provide little impact on traffic or parking. Provisions have been made in this application which will ameliorate traffic concerns, provide for trash accumulation and restrooms and will be of a temporary nature, with removal of stalls and equipment accomplished at the end of the day's events. 3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in the Municipal Code for such use. The proposed use shall comply with the conditions of Conditional Use Permit, PCC-05- 022 as recommended by the Planning Commission, and shall be in accordance with all applicable regulations and standards specified in the Municipal Code for such use. The proposed use is also in accordance with Municipal Code Section 19.58.148, which now allows Certified Farmers' Markets in residential zones, provided the property is used primarily for public or quasi-public uses. Furthermore, the conditions of this permit are approximately in proportion to the nature and extent of the impact created by the proposed development in that the conditions imposed are directly related to and of a nature and scope related to the size and impact of the Proj ect. 4. That the granting of this Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government agency. The granting of this Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the Chula Vista General Plan in that said Project is in the Public/Quasi-Public land use designation, which anticipates the gathering of groups of people for activities such as this Certified Farmers' Market. Thus the granting of this Conditional Use Permit is in keeping with the intent of the General Plan of the City. VI TERMS OF GRANT OF PERMIT The City Council hereby grants Conditional Use Permit PCC-OS-022, subject to the following conditions, whereby the Applicant and/or property owners shall: 12-13 Resolution No. 2005- Page 4 of? PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The Proj ect, as shown or described in the conceptual plans, applications and other exhibits shall be established and maintained as those plans are approved by the Planning Commission. No more than 45 vendors may participate, with at least 55% of those vendors being certified agricultural producers. 2. The Farmers' Market shall operate only on Saturdays, no more than once a week, with the day and hours of operation as established in this Conditional Use Permit, to whit, fiom 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. every Saturday. The market shall be located in the northeast area of the Southwestern College campus, closest to the intersection of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road. 3. Approval of a Planned Sign Program shall be obtained which designates all signs to be used. The approval of the Planned Sign Program shall comply with the provisions of CVMC 19.60.050. 4. Temporary signs identifying the Farmers' Market and hours thereof may be displayed during the event, and not more than four (4) hours before and one (1) hour after said event. 5. Pennants may be used only for safety and precautionary purposes. 6. Price signs may be used only when of a size and location so as to benefit the pedestrian shopper and not passing vehicles. 7. This Certified Farmers' Market shall be subject to the certification regulations of the State of California Department of Agriculture, Weights and Measures, and the County of San Diego's Department of Environment Health. 8. Live or recorded music may be played at the Farmers' Market, but shall not exceed fifty- five (55) dB at 50 feet fiom the outer edges of the immediate Market site. Pony/llama rides (three animals maximum - unless more are approved by the Planning Director), air jumps and playground equipment are also allowed, but shall not alone or in the aggregate, exceed twenty percent (33%) of the square footage devoted to vendors, pedestrian walkways, and entertainment (parking areas are excluded fiom this calculation). All other live animals, live entertainment or amusement rides are not allowed. 9. Adequate on and off-site security shall be provided and approved by the Police Department. 10. A traffic control and emergency access plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. After approval, said plan shall be adhered to and may be modified by the City fiom time to time as needed. 12-14 Resolution No. 2005- Page 5 of7 11. At least three portable toilets and one hand washing facility shall be located within or no more than fifty (50) feet fiom outer edges of the immediate Market site. 12. All Market areas (including parking areas) shall be kept in a neat and well-kept manner at all times. Furthe=ore, a recycling and solid waste management plan, specifying how the operator will address the disposal of these materials, shall be submitted to and approved by the City's Manager/Conservation Coordinator. After approval, said plan shall be adhered to and may be modified by the City fiom time to time as needed. 13. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified or deleted conditions imposed after approval of this permit to advance a legitimate governmental interest related to health, safety or welfare which the City shall impose after advance written notice to the Permittee and after the City has given to the Permittee the right to be heard with regard thereto. However, the City, in exercising this reserved right/condition, may not impose a substantial expense or deprive Permittee of a substantial revenue source which the Permittee cannot, in the no=al operation of the use permitted, be expected to economically recover. 14. Applicant/operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its Council members, officers, employees, agents and representatives, fiom and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorneys' fees (collectively, "liabilities") incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, fiom (a) City's approval and issuance of this conditional use permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Applicant's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including, without limitation, any and all liabilities arising fiom the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. Applicant/operator shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this conditional use permit where indicated, below. Applicant's/operator's compliance with this provision is an express condition of this conditional use permit and this provision shall be binding on any and all of Applicant's/operator's successors and assigns. 15. The applicant shall allow the Project Site, while it is in operation, to be inspected six months subsequent to the issuance of a business license to check conformance with Project plans and conditions of approval. 16. Approval ofthis request shall not waive compliance with all sections of Title 19 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code, and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 17. Pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code 19.58.148 (c) (6), this permit shall expire one (1) year after the date of its approval by the City Council. Any extension or renewal of this use permit must be granted by the City Council. 18. This Conditional Use Permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized or extended within the time allotted in Section 19.14.26b of the Municipal Code. 12-15 Resolution No. 2005- Page 6 of7 EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOL UTION OF APPROVAL 14. The property owner and the applicant shall execute this document by signing the lines provided below; said execution indicating that the property owner and applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded with the County Recorder of the county of San Diego, at the sole expense of the property owner and/or applicant, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the City's Planning and Building Department. Failure to return a signed and stamped copy of this recorded document within ten days of recordation to the City Clerk shall indicate the property owner/applicant's desire that the project, and the corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, beheld in abeyance without approval. Said document will also be on file in the City Clerk's Office. Signature of Property Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS 15. If any of the foregoing conditions fails to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. Failure to satisfy the conditions of this permit may also result in the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. Developer or a successor in interest gains no vested rights by the City's approval of this Resolution. INVALIDITY; A UTOMATIC REVOCATION 16. It is the intention of the Planning Commission that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution and the permit shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. 12-16 Resolution No. 2005- Page 7 of 7 Presented by: Approved as to fo= by: ~7,t+ James Sandoval, Director of Building and Planning Ann Moore City Attorney J:\attorneylreso \CUPIPCC-05·022.reso 12-17 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item No.: ~ Meeting Date: 4L5.ill5. ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approving a revised Tentative Subdivision Map for a portion of the Otay Ranch, Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan- Otay Project L.P., Chula Vista Tract 05-09 SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning and Buildin~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager &f; r;V (4/Sths Vote: Yes - No --X...) Otay Project LP has made an application to revise this previously approved tentative subdivision map comprising 105 acres of Village Seven of Otay Ranch. The original map was concurrently processed along with the Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, and for FEIR 04-05. The proposed revisions involve minor corrections to the original tentative map for on and off- site grading, trails and sidewalks. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Revised Tentative Subdivision Map 05-09A in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed the Revised Tentative Map PCS-05-09A and adopted the attached Resolution PCS-05-09A recommending approval by the City Council. The City Council reviewed and approved the original tentative map on October 12, 2004. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Village Seven Sectional Planning Area Plan and Tentative Maps (FEIR-04-06) are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared an addendum to FEIR-04-06 for this project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines. 13-1 Page 2, Item: I) Meeting Date: 4!~/O~ BACKGROUND Location The developable land area comprises the northwestern quarter of Village Seven, together with land extending along La Media Road and wrapping around the 50-acre VORTAC parcel (the VORT AC parcel is owned by the FAA for purposes of providing aviation guidance for flights arriving at Lindbergh Field). The entire area is generally bounded by Birch Road to the north, Magdalena Avenue to the east, Santa Luna Street to the south, and La Media Road to the west. In addition, a grading balance site is included and located within Otay Ranch Village Four. General Plan, Zoning and Land Use Criteria The General Plan and Otay Ranch General Development Plan describe Village Seven as a typical multi-density residential village including mixed-uses, and the zoning is Planned Community (PC). DISCUSSION Description of the Proposed Subdivision Request I. Revise the La Media Road cross-section by adding a 5-ft. sidewalk on the east side of La Media Road, connecting to the Birch Road sidewalk and continuing south to the southerly tentative map property boundary (adjacent to the Otay Land Company property); 2. Provide a 10-ft. wide meandering regional trail adjacent to the 5-ft. sidewalk on the east of La Media Road, connecting the Wolf Canyon regional trail to Santa Luna Street to the south (west of the VORTAC Site); 3. Provide a 10-ft. wide regional trail on the north side of Santa Luna Street, connecting La Media Road to Magdalena Avenue (south of the VORTAC Site); 4. ModifY the grading within and adjacent to the north, west and south periphery of the VORT AC (with the permission of the FAA), and modifY the limits of grading to accommodate construction of the La Media Road improvements and to avoid impacts to sensitive species within the Village Four/Community Park grading balance site. Otay Project LP has applied for approval of a tentative map amendment that would address some necessary minor technical changes to the appr~ved tentative subdivision map subdividing 13-2 Page 3, Item: } 3 Meeting Date: 4/<;/0<; approximately lOS-acres comprising the western portion of Village Seven in the Otay Ranch. Including the area of the balance site (Otay Ranch Village Four Community Park), the total area of coverage is approximately 175-acres including the on and off-site grading. The proposed tentative map amendment would address elements that were inadvertently omitted fiom the original tentative map that was officially approved, such as the La Media sidewalk and the two regional trails as noted in the approved Village Seven SPA Plan, as well as changes to the grading footprint in and around the VORTAC site. According to the revised tentative map, approximately 11.2-acres will be graded within and adjacent to the north, west and south periphery of the VORTAC (with the permission of the FAA). The original tentative map proposed dividing Otay Project's portion of Village Seven into three single-family neighborhoods comprising 375 lots on approximately 51-acres, a Co=unity Purpose Facility site of 0.8 acres, public rights-of-way and both natural and altered open space. Of note, Otay Project LP requested a substantial conformance approval on December 23, 2004 that allowed for a slight increase to the overall lot sizes which reduced the total number of lots by 15, so now there are a total of 360 lots over the same 51 acres. An~ly"i" The proposed revisions to the tentative map are consistent with the approved Village Seven SPA Plan and Otay Ranch General Development Plan, The inclusion of the La Media sidewalk and the inclusion of the two regional trails are corrections that provide consistency with the approved Village Seven SPA Plan. Of note, the Revised Tentative Map does not affect the residential neighborhood where concerns regarding vehicular access, narrower streets and multiple points of access were previously addressed; therefore the minor lot size and lot number changes that were approved by the substantial conformity request will be shown on subsequent final maps and are not being reflected in this revised tentative map. The proposed amendment provides for additional grading that would alter' an additional 11.2 acres within and adjacent to the north, west and south periphery of the VORTAC (with the permission of the FAA). The proposed grading within and adjacent to the VORTAC site will improve the viability of the meandering regional trail connecting Wolf Canyon to Santa Luna Street as well as the regional trail located on the north side of Santa Luna Street fiom La Media Road to Magdalena Avenue. As shown in the tentative map plan and section views, the proposed grading contours, brow ditches, slopes, and percentage grade on the trails are being improved to accommodate use of the regional trails. In addition, conditions of approval have been provided by the General Services Department's Engineering Division and Landscape Architecture Section to ensure that the revised tentative map amendments will be in full compliance with the Village Seven SPA Plan as well as applicable City codes and standards. 13-3 Page 4, Item: {.3 Meeting Date: 4/,10, CONCLUSION Staff has determined that the proposed revised tentative map merits the approval of the City Council. Staff has drafted a resolution providing an affirmative basis of fmdings as required by the Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act. The resolution has as attachment with the original and supplemental conditions of approval designed to clarify necessary perfonnance in carrying out the tentative subdivision map and improvements, to further assure initial and long- term conformance of the subdivision with these standards. FISCAL IMP ACT: There are no fiscal impacts fiom the preparation of this report and the processing of the Tentative Subdivision Map. All costs are covered by the deposit accounts. ATTACHMENTS I. Locator Map 2. FEIR-04-06 Addendum 3. Planning Commission Resolution (PCS-05-09A) 4. Application with Disclosure Statement J :\PLANNING\HAROLD\PCS~OS-09A-CCREPORT.DOC 13-4 Otay Ranch Village Seven Freewav Commercial Olav Rane h Hiah School Otay Ranch Company Ownership EUC V1l1aae 7 Vortac Site (FAA) ~~ '" %~ "Þ' '?~ "Z ~~~ . ?~ ~ ) PROJECT lOCATION Revised Tentative Map PCS-05-09 13"'5 SECOND ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE SEVEN SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND TENTATIVE MAPS (EIR 04-06) PROJECT NAME: Otay Ranch LP Amended Tentative Map for Village Seven PROJECT LOCATION: South of Birch Road, east of future La Media Road, and west of future Magdalena Road PROJECT APPLICANT: Otay Project, L.P., A California Limited Liability Corporation CASE NO: IS-05-014 DATE: March 10, 2005 I. BACKGROUND A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Tentative Maps (TM) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) were certified on October 12, 2004 (FEIR 04-06) by Resolution No. 04-06. FEIR 04- 06 addressed TMs for both ownerships within the Village Seven SPA area, namely McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC and Otay Project LP. Both TMs were also approved on October 12, 2004. II. THE PROPOSED PROJECT Otay Project LP proposes to amend CV Tract No. 05-09. The revised Otay Project LP TM reflects the following changes: · Revised La Media Road section to add a 5-foot sidewalk on the east side of La Media fiom Birch Road to the southern property line and providing area for a 10-foot wide regional trail south of Wolf Canyon connecting to Santa Luna. · Revised Santa Luna section to add a 10-foot trail on the north side between Magdalena Avenue and La Media Road; · Revised limits of grading to resolve geotechnical issues associated with the grading and construction of La Media Road, provide a 20-foot grading offset along with western edge of the TM boundary and avoid sensitive habitat on the northwestern edge of the Village Four balance site. No other changes are being proposed to the site plan or development potential ofthe site. The proposed Otay Project LP TM amendment involves a change in the grading footprint fiom the footprint addressed in FEIR 04-06. The amended TM would result in the additional grading of 1 1.2 acres within Village Seven that were not previously considered in FEIR 04-06. The additional grading would occur within and adjacent to the north, west and south periphery of the VORTAC. The additional grading is shown in Exhibit I. EIR 04-06 Second Addendum 1 13-6 03/11/05 III. CEQA REQUIREMENTS Sections 15162 through 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines discuss a lead agency's responsibilities in handling new information that was not included in a project's environmental document. Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (I) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise ofreasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. EJR 04-06 Second Addendum d-7 OJ/] 1105 Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides: (a) The lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. (b) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR. (c) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR prior to making a decision on the project. (d) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's required findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. This Addendum to FEIR 04-06 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the City of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures and Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines. As discussed in Section IV below, the proposed project would not result in new significant impacts or an increase in severity of the impacts disclosed in FEIR 04- 06. The proposed proj ect is consistent with the land use and intensity of development assumed for the site in FEIR 04-06. No new information of substantial importance has been identified that was not known and could not have been known at the time the FEIR was prepared. Further, the proposed project does not change the analysis and conclusions in the FEIR. The mitigation measures identified in FEIR 04-06 would be equally applicable to the proposed project. IV. SCOPE OF ANALYSIS The proposed amended Otay Project LP TM would not change the approved land use designations or intensity of development for the site. Neither the location of the residential development nor the location of roads would be changed. Thus, impacts discussed in FEIR 04- 06 related to land use and land use intensity, such as land use compatibility, traffic, circu]ation and access, noise, utilities and public services and population and housing would be unchanged. The analysis contained in the FEIR 04-06 and mitigation measures required by the MMRP relative to these issues are unchanged and are hereby incorporated by reference. No further environmental analysis is necessary for these issues. The proposed increase in grading would result in construction-related impacts to air quality and water quality and drainage impacts similar to the approved Otay Project LP TM. The analysis contained in FEIR 04-06 and mitigation measures required by the MMRP relative to these issues are unchanged and are hereby incorporated by reference. No further environmental analysis is necessary for these issues. 3 13-8 03/11/05 EIR 04-06 Second Addendum The proposed amended OtayProject LP TM provides area for a traÜ along the south side of Wolf Canyon that would extend to and along Santa Luna Street to Magdalena Avenue. The trail is included in the approved Village Seven SPA and was addressed in FEIR 04-06. The analysis contained in FEIR 04-06 and mitigation measures required by the MMRP relative to recreation are unchanged and are hereby incorporated by reference. No further environmental analysis is necessary. Based on the foregoing, the scope of the analysis contained herein focuses on the change to physical features of the new area to be graded, namely agricultural resources, landform, geology and soils, cultural and paleontological resources, and biological resources. Agricultural Resources FEIR 04-06 addressed the impact of the approved Otay Project LP TM on agricultural resources, and it concluded that the development of the Otay Project LP TM would result in the conversion of 108.3 acres within the Village Seven SPA plan area as well as 44.4 acres of the borrow site of Farmland of Local Importance and Grazing land to urban uses. Short-term impacts between ongoing agricultural uses and urban uses were mitigated with Mitigation Measure 4.2-1. The long-term loss of important Farmland to urban uses was determined to be significant and unmitigable, and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were adopted. The proposed amended Otay Project LP TM would impact an additional 3.8 acres of agricultural land that is considered Farmland of Local Importance. As stated previously, the impact to agricultural resources was already identified as significant and unrnitigable. The analysis of agricultural resources contained in the FEIR 04-06, the MMRP, the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations are hereby incorporated by reference. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.2-1 fiom the Village Seven FEIR and MMRP would still be required. However, the impact would remain significant and unmitigable. Landform! Aesthetics FEIR 04-06 addressed the impact of the approved Otay Project LP TM on landform alteration and aesthetics. The FEIR concluded that the proposed Village Seven SPA Plan and TMs would permanently alter the visual character of the site and landform. These impacts were considered significant and unmitigable, and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were adopted. The proposed new grading would not impact additional steep slopes (slopes over 25%) over that which was considered in the FEIR. The proposed additional grading would not impact scenic vistas or scenic resources. 'The additional grading would not have an impact on nighttime lighting as no development is proposed in these areas. The grading would permanently alter an additional 11.2 acres. The impact to visual character and landform was already identified as significant and unmitigable. The analysis of landform alteration/aesthetics contained in FEIR, the MMRP, the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations are hereby incorporated by reference. Implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.6-1 and 4.6-2 and 4.6-4 fiom FEIR 04-06 and MMRP would still be required. However, the impact would remain significant and unmitigabIe. , EIR 04-06 Second Addendum 1 34_ 9 OJ/11/05 Geology and Soils FEIR 04-06 addressed the impact of the approved Otay Project LP TM on the issue of geology and soils. The analysis of the Otay Project LP TM was based upon the geology report "Otay Ranch Village 7, R-2 and Village 4 Community Park" prepared by GEOCON, Inc. and dated May 5, 2004. The FEIR concluded that unstable geologic and soil conditions occur within the TM area, and remedial grading would be required. FEIR 04-06 Mitigation Measure 4.8-2 requires that prior to issuance of the grading permit, the applicable recommendations in the aforementioned geotechnical report be included in the project design and construction documents to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. GEOCON, Inc. has reviewed the amended TM and has verified that the project design and construction documents have incorporated the recommendations of the referenced geotechnical investigation. The proposed amended TM would result in the same impact as identified in FEIR 04-06, and implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.8-2 would still be required. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 04-06 would reduce the impact related to geology and soils to below a level of significance. BioIogical Resources FEIR 04-06 addressed the impact of the approved Otay Project LP TM on biological resources. The biological analysis concluded that implementation of the TM would impact sensitive vegetation communities and has the potential to impact sensitive wildlife species through the loss of foraging habitat. All impacts to biological resources were mitigated to below significance with the exception of the loss of non-native grassland, which provides foraging habitat for raptors. This impact was determined to be significant and unmitigable, and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were adopted. The proposed amended TM would impact an additional 3.8 acres of agricultural land, 0.1 acre of disturbed habitat, and 7.3 acres annual non-native grassland. These three habitats were found within the approved TM and are discussed in FEIR 04-06. As defined in FEIR 04-06, agricultural lands are areas that have been under cultivation or are pastures actively grazed by livestock and contain less than 20 percent native plant coverage. Disturbed habitat has been subject to mechanical disturbance, greatly limiting the growth of vegetation. Disturbed habitat occurs along dirt access roads or graded areas that Jack vegetation. Non-native grassland is characterized as a sparse to dense coverage of non-native grasses, which are sometime associated with species of native annual forbs. It occurs where native vegetation has been fiequently disturbed so that the native community is incapable of recovering. FEIR 04-06 concluded that the loss of disturbed habitat and agricultural land is not significant fiom a biological standpoint (see discussion of loss of agricultural land above). Thus, the additional loss of these habitats resulting fiom the proposed TM amendment would not be significant. However, consistent with FEIR 04-06, the loss of the additiona] 7.3 acres of non- native grassJand is considered significant and unmitigabIe. Implementation of Mitigation 5 13-10 03/11/05 EIR 04-06 Set'ond Addendum Measures 4.11-1, 4.11-2, 4.11-4, 4.11-5, and 4.1 1-6 fiom the Village Seven FEIR and MMRP would still be required. However, the impact to foraging habitat would remain significant and unmitigable. Cultural and Paleontological Resources Cultural and paleontological resources were addressed in the Village Seven EIR. The EIR concluded that implementation of the Village Seven SPA and TMs could result in potentially significant impacts to unknown, subsurface cultural resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.9-1 would reduce this impact to below significance. Mitigation Measure 4.9-1 requires I) onsite monitoring of cultural resources during grading, 2) a determination of significance if resources are found, 3) identification of suitable mitigation measures should significant resources be found, and 4) curation of collected resources. Brian F. Smith and Associates conducted the cultural resources survey of the Otay Project LP ownership in December 2003 and February 2004. The results of their survey are included in the Village Seven EIR. On August 19,2004 a field survey was conducted of the area proposed for additional grading in the amended TM. One previously recorded site, Site-12,565 was reported as being located within the boundaries of the VORTAC parcel. This site was identified and described in the Village Seven EIR as a low- density lithic scatter of flaked stone artifacts. The site was evaluated for importance or significance under CEQA and determined to be not significant. The site was originally recorded in 1992, but the survey conducted in August 2004 did not locate Site SDI -12,565 again. This could have been because of poor visibility due to dense grasses. Although SDI-12,565 was not re-Iocated and has been impacted by the construction of the VORTAC facility and associated access roads, resources that were recorded in 1992 could be masked or buried beneath fill dirt or matted vegetation. Monitoring for cultural resources during grading as required by Mitigation Measure 4.9-1 fiom the Village Seven EIR and MMRP would still be required. The Village Seven EIR also analyzed the potential for impacts to paleontological resources. The FEIR concluded that grading activities associated with the development of the Village Seven SPA and TMs would affect portions of the Otay Formation, which is considered to have high paleontologicaJ resource sensitivity. The potential impact to paleontological resources was determined to be significant but mitigable with implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.10-1 through 4.1 0-4. These measures require: I) identification of a qualified paleontologist to monitor grading activities during the original cutting of the Otay Formation, 2) recovery of paleonto]ogical materia] if found, and 3) deposition of recovered resources and field notes and photos into a scientific institution with paleontological collections and preparation of a summary report. Similar to the analysis presented in the FEIR, the new grading associated with the amended TM would result in potential impacts to unidentified paleontologica] resources within the Otay Formation. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.10-1 through 4.10-4 fiom the Village Seven EIR and MMRP the impact would be mitigated to below significance. EIR 04-06 Second Addendum 13~11 03/11/05 Sie:nificance of Impacts The proposed amended TM would not result in new impacts that were not previously identified. No new mitigation measures are required. Impacts to landform alteration, agricultural resources and biological resources (loss of foraging habitat) would remain significant and unmitigable as analyzed in the Village Seven FEIR, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. Impacts to geology and soils, cultural resources, and paleontological resources would be significant and mitigable with mitigation measures included in the Village Seven FEIR and MMRP. IV. CONCLUSION Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, and based upon the substantial evidence in the record supporting the above discussion, I hereby find that the proposed amendment to the Otay Project LP TM will result in only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make the Village Seven FEIR (EIR No. 04-06) adequate under CEQA. ~~/t?~~7 Marilyn R. F. Ponseggi Environmental Review Coordinator References: · City ofChula Vista Environmental Review Procedures · Final EIR for the Village Seven SPA and TMs dated October 12, 2004 (EIR 04-06) · Letter from Brian F. Smith & Associates, "Supplemental Information for the Otay Ranch Village Seven Cultural Resources Evaluation Report submitted February 2004", dated February 2, 2005. · Letter from Dudek & Associates, Inc., "New Impact Areas for Otay Ranch Village Seven, City of Chula Vista, San Diego County, California", dated January 31, 2005 · Letter from GEOCON, Inc. "Otay Ranch Village 7, R-2, Review of Mitigation Measures, dated January 31, 2005. · Letter from Hunsaker & Associates, "Revised TM 05-09A Slope Analysis", dated January 26,2005 EJR 04-06 Second Addendum 1 37_1 2 03/11/05 '" " i; ~ '" ë ¡¡ ã ~ .. i; = ." .. "" " l " Õ (: i ! e ~ 1 i « ~ ð ; :: --g . _ ;: '1 10 : : ~ of :i > æ i 3 e n~:~IQ. o ~ ~ a . . i~§ ~ :' ~ o ~ @-¡ § % W U ~ o . o % ë ~ o 13 13 II ~ I ~ = C) N.5 §:."'C .dE ~C) 0: _ ~co ~ c: co 0 ;:¡ :a "'0 ~ "'0 Q) tI) o a. o .... a. RESOLUTION NO. PCS-05-09A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A REVISED TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP FOR A PORTION OF THE OTAY RANCH, VILLAGE SEVEN SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN- OTAY PROJECT L.P., CHULA VISTA TRACT 05-09A. WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this resolution is identified as Exhibit "A" attached to City Council Resolution and described on Chula Vista Tract 05-09A, and is commonly known as "Otay Ranch Village Seven Revised Tentative Map", ("Property"); and, WHEREAS, a duly verified application for the subdivision of the Property in the form of a tentative subdivision map known as "Otay Ranch Village Seven Revised Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-09A", ("Project"), was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department on February 9, 2005 by Otay Project L.P., ("Applicant"); and, WHEREAS, the application requests the approval for the subdivision of approximately 105 acres of land located east of La Media Road and south of Birch Road within Otay Ranch Village Seven SPA into 360 Residential lots; and WHEREAS, the development of the Property has been the subject matter of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan ("GDP") previously approved by the City Council on October 28, 1993 by Resolution No. 17298, and as amended on November 10, 1998 by Resolution No. 19253 ("GDP Resolution") wherein the City Council, in the environmental evaluation of said GDP, relied in part on the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report No. 90-01, SCH #9010154 ("Program FEIR 90-01"); and, WHEREAS, The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Project and determined that the Project would require an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report for Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Tentative Maps (Final EIR 04-06) that was approved October 12, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said Otay Ranch Village Seven Revised Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-09A, (PCS-05-09A) and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project site at least ten days prior to the hearing; and, WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m. on March 16, 2005, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, fiom the facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission has determined that the approval of "Otay Ranch Village Seven Revised Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-09A", (PCS-05-09A) is consistent 13-14 Planning Commission Resolution PCS OS-09A Page 2 with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Otay Ranch Planning Area 7 SPA Plan, and all other applicable Plans, and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning practice support the approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving "Otay Ranch Village Seven Revised Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-09A", (pCS-05-09A) in accordance with the findings contained in the attached City Council Resolution. And that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the property and the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 16th day of March, 2005 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: Marco Cortes, Chair Diana Vargas, Secretary J:\PLANNING\HAROLD\RESOlUTIONS\PCS-05-09REVISEDTM-PCRESO.DOC 13-15 -- FEB. 1. 2005 9:07AM ~!f.?. --e-- ~~ CI1Y 01' CHUIA VISTA NO. 738 P. 2 Plannil g & B,uilding Department Planning Diviaion I Development Processing APPLICATION · DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING . TYPE B Part 1 T of Review Re uested o General Plan Amondment o Gonerel Dewlopment Plan ONew (or) DAmendment o SPA/Specific Plan ONew (or) OAmendment ~ Zone Chenge ..Y Tentative S"bdlvision Map AmtYld V'r\tm Annexation o Other: A lication Information Applicant Name: OTAJr PROJECT, LP a Applicant Address: era Wast Ash, Suite 1500 San Dieg-o , CA 92101 Contact: Ranie Hunte" Phone: 161 <¡oj '~d-doo;n pyt 107 Applicant~ Inlore5l in Properl,y (II eppllcant is not lI1e owner. lI1e owner~ autIJorization signature at th. end 01 this form Is required to process this request) [JOwn 0 leas. orn escrow o Option 10 pUrchase Engineer/Agent: Hunsaker & Associates Address: 10179 ¡¡uanneken., 8t. :<00, SD, CA 9:<121 Contact Lex Willintan Phone: rR~R1 o;o;R-4;;OO Prlmery contllct is: Q Applicant 0 Agent OEmanoddress or primary contact: RHl1ntBdotayranch. corn General Project Description loll types! Project Name: atay ¡¡"DOh Village 7 General Description of Proposed Project: Proposed Use: Residential !!æ.lect Property Information lall types) locallon/Stree! Address: Village 7 Auessor'! Parcel ,,:gU:B~8:H and.. Total hreage: ~7lfð * Redevelopment Area (11.ppl;oobJe): General Pia" Designallon: D. c. Zone Deslgnallon: SP4 Planfled Community Olappllcoble¡: otay Ranch C"rrent land Use: Vacant Wlrhir¡ Momgomery Specific Plan? ¡¡¡Yes 0 No General Plan Amendment Proposed Land Use DeslgneUon: II/A JustificatIon for General Plan change: *¡ncludee on-site and off-aite grading- 276 Fourth Avenue I Chula Villa California ¡ 91910 (619) 691-5101 I'-&'O¡ j "'It 13-16 FEB. 1.2005 9:07AM ~!ft. ~ O'T\'OF OiUIA VIsrA NO. 738 P. 3 APPLICATION · DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING . TYPE B Part 2 General Development Plan General Development Plan Name: Otay Ranch I'niposed Land Uses I Toh:11 Acres: Commercial I Acres Industrial I Acres Parks I Acres School! I Acres Community Purpose I 0.8 Acres CArculeUon I 14.7 Acres PublielQuasll Acre. Open Space I 38.7 Acres Residenfiall Range: Single Family Detachad I Single Family Allache~ I Duplexes I Apartments I Condominiums I to 375 Units 51.0 Acres to Unit. kres to Units Acres to Units Acres to Unit. Acres to Units Acres TOTAlS I Annexation Pre.oning: LAfCO Reference #: Tentative Subdivision Map Subdivision Neme: Otliv Ranch Villacre 7 Minimum lot .ize: 34X85 Number of unlls: CV Tract #: 05-09-111 375 Avcirage 101 size: Zone ChanAe o Rezoning Proposed zoning: o Prezoning o Setback Authorization print.apPllcantname:~~~ ApphcantSlgnolure: ~_ Dale: January 20, 2005 Printownernem.·; ~ OWner Signalu...·: . Data: J an uary 'Proof of ownrnhlp may be roqulred. LotIer of con..nt may bo provlded.in lieu oI.lgnalure. 20, 2005 276 Fourth Avenue I Chula Vista I California 91910 (619) 691·5101 IR~5~1 ..tJ. 13-17 FEB. 1.2005 9:07AM NO. 738 P 4 CI1Y 01' CHUIA VISrA Plann ng Be Building Department Planning Division I Deveiopment Processing APPLICATION APPENDIX A Project Description & Justification Project Name: ~ OTAi' RANCH VILLAGE ? ~M OS-09A Applicant Name: OTAi' PROJECT LP Please fully desonbe the proposed project, any Ind all construction that may be accomplished as a result of approval of this project, and the project's benefits to yourself, the property, the neighborhood, and the City of Chuls vlela, Include any details necessary 10 adequately explain the SCOpe arid/or operation of the proposed project You may include any background Informa6on and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the appUcaUon. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. For all Conditional Use Permits or Variances, please address the required "flndlngs' as listed in the Application Procedural Guide. The proposal inoludes amendment a to -TM 05-09 approved by the Chula Vista City Counoil on ootober 12, 2004. These amendments inolude, Revise La Media oross-seotion adding a 5' sidewalk on the east side and add a 10' Regional Trail from Wolf Canyon to Santa Luna StreetF adding a la' wide Regional Trail to the north side of santa Luna~ and modifying the limits of grading to a~aomodate construction of ~a Media Rd. improvements and to avoid impacts to sensitive species within the Village 4 grading balance site. :276 Fourth Avenue I Chula Vista CalifDrnia I 91910 (619) 691·5101 13-18 F E8. L 2005 9: 08AM NO. 738 P. 5 PI ann ng & Building Dep¡¡rtment Planning Division I Development Pro~eSling APPLICATION AÞÞENCIX B Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Council Polley 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Counoll, Planning Commission and all other official bOdies of tha Cily, a stalement of disclosure of certaIn owne"'hlp or financial interests, payments, or ca mpaign contributiona for a City of Chula Vista ejection must be filed. The following information must be disclo5ed: . 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest In the property that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contracter. subcontractor, malerial supplier. Jim BalClwin AI BalClwin OTAY PROJECT LP 2. If any person> identified pursuant to (1) above Is a oorpora1lon or partnership, list the names of all individuals with a $2000 investment in the buslnass (corporatlon/partnel'$hlp) entity. Al Baldwin Jim Bald.win 3. f any person> identified pursuant to (1) abova ia II non-profit organization or trust, list the names of any person salVing aa director of the non-profit organization or "" trustee or beneficiary or trustor of tne trust. N/A 4. Please Identil'ý every person, includlnj any agents, employees. oonsu~snts, or Independent oontractors you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. Al BalClwin Kim John Kilkenny Jim Bald.w~n ~ob Cameron Kent Aden ~anie Hunter 5. Haa any person> associeted with this oontract had any financial dealings with sn official'" of the City of Chula Vista a. it relates to thl8 oontract w~hin the past 12 months. Yes_ Nci~ ' If Yes, briefiy describe the nature of the financial interest the official" may have in this oontract. 6. Have you made a contrlbu~on of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chura Vista City Counoll? No":: Yes _If yes, which Council member'? 27& Fourth A"enue I Chula VIUa Callforni. I 91910 (619) 691-5101 13-19 9:08AM NO. 738 P. 6 CITY 01' CHUIA VlsrA Plann ng & Building Department Planning Division I Development Processing Disclosure Statement - Page 2 APPLICATION APPENDIX B 7. Halle you provided more than $340 (or an item 01 equivalent value) to an offIoial" of the City of Chula VisfB In the past twe!ve (121 months? (ThiS includes being a source of Income, money to retire a legal deb~ gift, loan, etc.) Yes_ No...!... If Yes, Which official" and what was the nature of ~em provided? Date; January 20, 2005 ~I~!~ Ranie Hunter type name of Contractor/Applicant Person is defined as: any individual, firm, oo-partnershlp, joint venture, association, sooial clUb, fraternal organi:¡ation. corporation. estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, dietric~ or other political subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. Prlntor . .. Official Include¡" but is not limited, to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a board, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members. 276 FOurth Avenu" I Chula Vista California I 91910 (619) 691-5101 13-20 NO. 738 P. 7 Plann ng & Building Department Planning DiVision I Developmen( Processing Development Permit Processing Agreement APPLICATION APPENDIX C PelTl'lit ApplIcant: Applicanrs Address: Type of Permit: Agreement Dale: Deposit Amount: OTAY PROJECT LP 610 West Ash, Suite 1500, San Diego, CA 92121 Revised TM Jenuary 20, 2005 This Agreement ('Agreement") betweer¡ the c~y of Chula Vista, a chartered municipal corporation ('CIty") and the forenamed applicant for a development permit ("Applieen!'), effective as of the Agreement Date ¡¡e! forth above, is made with reference to the following facts: . Whereas, Applicant has applied to the City for a permit of the tyPa aforerefarenoed ("Perm In Which the City has requil'!!d to be obtained as a condition to permitting Applicant to develop a parcel of property; and, Whereas, the Cily will incur expenses In order to process said permit through the various departments and before Jhe various boards and commissions of the City ('Processing Servloes"): and, Whereas the purPose of this agreement Is to reimburse the Clly for all expenses It will incur In connection with providing the Processing Services: Now, therefore, the parties do hereby agree, in exchange for the mutual promises herein contained, as follows: 1. Applicant's Duty to Pay, Applicant shall pay all of city's expenses Incurred In providing Processing Services related to Applicant's i"ermit, Including all of City's direct and ovemead costs related thereto. This dlirty of Applicent shall be referred to herein as 'Applicant's Duty to i"ay." 1.1. Applicant's Daposit Duty. f!v5 partial performance of Applicant'. Duty to Pay, Applican~ shall deposit the amount aforereferenced ('Deposit'), 1,1,1. City shall charge il8 lawful expenses incurred in prov;ding Processing Servicl!8 against Applicant's Deposit If, after the conclusion of processing Applicant's Pen'l1lt, any portion of the Deposit remains, City shall return said balance to Applicant without Interest thereon. If, during the processing of Applloant's Permit, the amount of the Deposit becomes exhausted, or fa imminently likaly to become exhausted In the opinIon of the e City, upon notice of same by City, Applicant shall forthwllh provide such additional deposit as Cily shall caloulate as reasonably necessary to continue Processing Services. The duty of Applicant to Initially deposit and to supplement said deposit as herein required shall be known as 'Applioant's Deposll Duty'. 2, City's Duty. City shall, upon the condition thst Applicant Is no In breach of Applicant's Duty to Payor Applicant's Deposit Duty, use good faith to provide processing se/'\lices In reiatlon to Applicant's Permit applicallon. 2.1, City shall have no liability hereunder to Applicant for the failure 10 process Applicanfs PermIt applioation, or for failure to process Applicanrs Permit within the 6me f"'me requested by Applicant or estlma1ed by City. 276 Fourth Avenue I Chula Vi,t. California I 91910 (619) 691-5101 13-21 NO. 738 P. 8 P I ann n g & Building Department PlannIng DivisIon I Development Processing COY Of CHULA VISTA Development Permit Processing Agreement - Page 2 2.2. By execution of thiS agreement Applicant shall haw no light to tha Parmit for which Applicant has applied. City shall usa its discretion in valuating Appllcanfs Permit AppJlcatlon without reganJ to Applicant's promise to pay for tha Processing Services, or the execution of the Agreement. 3. Remedies. 3.1, Suspension of ProC05sing In addlll¢n to all other lights and remedies which the City shall otherwise have at law or equity, the City has the right to suspend andlor withhold the processing of the Perm" Which is the subject matter of th1s Agreement, as well as the Permit Which may be the subject matter of any other Permit whloh Applicant has before the City. 3.2. Civil CoIle¡;flon In addition to aU ether rights and remedies Which the City shall otherwise have at law Or equity, the City has the right to collect all sums whioh are or may become due hereunder by civil action, and upon InstitutiAg litigation to collect seme, the prevailing party shall be &ntitled to reasonable attorney's tees and costs. ' 4. Miscellaneous. 4.1 Notices. All notioes, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be In writing. All notices, demands and requasts to be sant to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served II personally served or deposlfed in the United States mall, ~ddreS8ed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested at the addresses Identified adjacent to the signatures of the parties represented. 4.2 Governing LawNenue. This Agreement shell be governed by and construed In accordance with Ihe laws of the State of California. My action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal Dr state courts located in San Diego County, State of California. and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as pœsible. Venue for this Agreement, and perfotmance hereundar, shall ba the Clfyof Chula Vista. 4.3. Multiple Signatories. If there are muttiple signatories to thie agreement on behalf of Applicant, each of such signatories shall be joIntly and sevarally lIable for the performanoe of Applicant's dudes hereIn set forth. 4.4. Signatory Authorlty. This signatory to thia agreement hereby warrants and represen!l$ that he Is the duly designated agent for the Appllollnt and has baen dulyauthortzed by the Applicant to exeoute this Agreement on behalf of the Apþlioant. Signatory shall be personally liable for Applicant'a Duly to Pay and Apþllcant's Duty to Deposit in the event he has not been authorized to execute this Agreement by Applioan!. 4.5 Hold Harmless. ApplIcent shall defend, indemnIfy and hold hatmless the City, its elected and appointed Dfflcars and employees. from and against any claims, suits, actions Dr proceedings, judlolal or admlnistr¡¡tlve, for writs, orders, injunction or other relIef, damages, liability, cost and expense (including without IimitaUon attorneys' fees) arising out of City's actioMS In prooesslng or Issuing ApplIcant's Permit, or In exercising any discretion relsted thereto including but not lImited to the gMng of proper environmental revfew, the holding or public hearings, the extel1$lon of due process rights, except only for those claims, suits, actions or prOOBedings arising from the sole negligence or sole willfUl conduct of the City, its officers, Or employees known to, but not objected !o, by the AppUcant. Applicanfs indemnlflcation shall inciud& any and all cosls, expenses, attorney's fees and liability Incurred by the City, its officers, agents. or employees in defending against such claims, Whether the same proceed to Judgement or not. Further, Applicant, at ita own expense, shall, upon written requeat by the City, defend any suoh suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees. Applloant'a indemnification of City ehall not bé limited by any prior or subeequent deolaration by the 276 Fourth Avenue I Chul. Vista Callfo'nla I 9191 D (619) 691-5101 13-22 FEB. 1.2005 9:09AM NO. 738 P. 9 em OF (HULA VISfA Plann ng & Building Department Planning Division I Development Processing Development Permit Processing Agreement - Page 3 Applicant. At its sole discretion, the City msy partlclpate at ilt own W<¡ ense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of any obllgaijon Imposed by this condition. 4.6 Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures, No suit or arbitration shall be brought analng out of this agreement agmnst the City unless a claim has first been presented In writing and filed with the City of Chula Vista and acted upon by the City of Chula Vista In accordance wnh the procedures set forth in Chapter f.34 of the Chura Vista Municipal COde, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by thie referençe as If fully sat forth herein, and such þOllcies Bnd procedures used by the City in the Implementatior¡ of same. Upon reqUest by City, Consultant shall meet and confer In good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. Now therefore, the parties hereto, having read and undet¡;!ood the terms and conditions 01 this agreemen~ do hereby express their consent to the terms hereof by setting their hand hereto on the date set forth Bdjacent thereto. Dsted: City of Chuia \tista" 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA By: Dated; Januuy 20, 2005 OTAY PROJECT, LP blU west AS~, SUIte 1500 san DIego, CA 92101 By: Vice President 276 Fourth Avenue , Chul. Vista CAIi/or"i. I 91910 (619) 691.5101 13-23 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A REVISED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR A PORTION OF THE OTAY RANCH, VILLAGE SEVEN SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN- OTAY PROJECT L.P., CHULA VISTA TRACT 05-09A. WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this resolution is identified as Exhibit "A" attached to City Council Resolution No. and described on Chula Vista Tract 05-09A, and is commonly known as Otay Ranch Village Seven Tentative Map, ("Property"); and, WHEREAS, a duly verified application for the subdivision of the Property in the form of a tentative subdivision map known as "Otay Ranch Village Seven Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-09A", ("Project"), was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department on February 9, 2005 by Otay Project L.P., ("Applicant"); and, WHEREAS, the application requests the approval for the subdivision of approximately 105 acres of land located east of La Media and south of Birch Road within Otay Ranch Village Seven SPA into 360 residential lots; and WHEREAS, the development of the Property has been the subject matter of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan ("GDP") previously approved by the City Council on October 28, 1993 by Resolution No. 17298, and as amended on November 10, 1998 by Resolution No. 19253 ("GDP Resolution") wherein the City Council, in the environmental evaluation of said GDP, relied in part on the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report No. 90-01, SCH #9010154 ("Program FEIR 90-01 "); and, WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Project and determined that the Project would require an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report for Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Tentative Maps (Final EIR 04-06) that was approved October 12, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said "Otay Ranch Village Seven Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-09A", (PCS-05-09A) and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication 'iIllì newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project site at least ten days prior to the hearing; and, WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m. on March 16, 2005, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Project and said hearing was thereafter closed; and 13-24 Resolution WHEREAS, a public hearing was scheduled before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on proposed "Otay Ranch Village Seven Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-09A", (PCS-05-09A) and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows: I. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at tlleir public hearing held on March 16, 2005, and the minutes and resolutions resulting therefiom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents, along with any documents submitted to the decision makers, shall comprise the entire record of the proceedings for any Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) claims. II. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The environmental impacts associated with this Revised Tentative Subdivision Map for Village Seven have been analyzed in the Second Addendum to FEIR-04-06. The City Council has considered FEIR 04-06 and the Second Addendum, and finds that they have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQAJ, Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq., the CEQA Guidelines, Cal. Code Regulations, Title 14, section 15000 et seq., and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista. The City Council finds that none of the conditions in CEQA Guideline section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. Accordingly, the City Council hereby adopts the Second Addendum. III. ACTION The City Council hereby approves the resolution approving the Otay Ranch Village Seven Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05-09", (PCS-05-09) involving 105 acres of land known as Otay Ranch Village Seven Tentative Map in this resolution, finding it is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Village Seven SPA Plan, and all other applicable Plans, and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning and zoning practice support their approval and implementation. IV. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS Pursuant to Govemment Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Otay Ranch Village Seven Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 05- 09A", (PCS-05-09A) as conditioned, attached as Exhibit "B" to this resolution, herein for Applicant, is in conformance with all the various elements of the City's General Plan, the Otay Ranch General Development Plan and Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, based on the following: 2 13-25 Resolution 3 1. Land Use The Project is in a planned area that provides urban village uses authorized by the Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. The Revised Tentative Map proposes a total of 360 residential dwelling units. A total of three single-family residential neighborhoods are proposed ranging fiom 7.2 to 17.9 dwelling unit per acre. Lot sizes average fiom 2720 square feet to 5841 square feet. 2. Circulation All of the on-site and off-site public and private improvements required to serve the subdivision are part of the project description or are conditioned consistent with the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, and the Village Seven SPA Plan. The Applicant shall construct those facilities in accordance with City and the Village Seven SPA Plan standards. The Village 7 Circulation Plan details the hierarchy of vehicular circulation for internal neighborhood residential streets, collector streets, village entries and prime arterials serving the Project. The Tentative Map provides multiple points of access to Magdalena. The Tentative Map boundaries are bounded by Magdalena on the east, Birch Road on the North and future extension of La Media Road on the west. Access to these arterials will be via Magdalena. A fourth point of entry will be via Magdalena to the south, which will provide access to the high school site and will eventually tie to Rock Mountain Road. Magdalena will serve as the primary backbone, bisecting Village 7 fiom north to south and crossing the greenbelt. 3. Housing The Project provides a mix of lot sizes for single family for persons of various income levels. Prior to recordation of any final subdivision map for the Project, the Developer will enter into an Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement. The Agreement will set forth the method of determination of the in-lieu contribution, schedule for payment, and the value of the total in-lieu contribution. 4. Parks, Recreation and ()Pen Space In fulfillment of its obligation to provide 3.96 acres of parkland, the developer will provide land via an irrevocable offer of dedication, 13-26 Resolution 4 payment of in-lieu fees, or a combination thereof towards a Community Park within the service area of Village 7. The developer will also provide development fees in accordance with CVMC 17.10. The Village Greenway, part of the Citywide greenbelt trail that is to provide for a connection fiom Otay Valley Regional Park through Otay Ranch and to Salt Creek, as described in the City's Greenbelt Master Plan, will be incorporated within the Wolf Canyon corridor between La Media Road and Magdalena Avenue. 5. Conservation The Program EIR and FEIR addressed the goals and policies of the Conservation Element of the General Plan and found development of this site to be consistent with these goals and policies. The Otay Ranch Phase Two Resource Management Plan requires conveyance of 1.18 acres of land to the Otay Ranch Preserve for every one-acre of developed land prior to approval of any Final Map. 6. Seismic Safety The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and policies of the Seismic Element of the General Plan for this site. No seismic faults have been identified in the vicinity of the Proj ect according to the Village Seven SPA Geotechnical Reconnaissance Report. 7. Public Safetv All public and private facilities are expected to be reachable within the threshold response times for fIre and police services. 8. Public Facilities The Applicant will provide all on-site and off-site streets, sewers and, water facilities necessary to serve this Project. The developer will also contribute to the Otay Water District's improvement requirements to provide terminal water storage for this Project as well as other major projects in the eastern territories. 9. Noise The Project will include noise attenuation walls. In addition, all buildings are required to meet the standards of the Uniform Building Code with regard to acceptable interior noise levels. 13-27 Resolution 10. Scenic Highwav The roadway design provides wide landscaped buffers along Magdalena, Birch Road, and Rock Mountain Road. There is no scenic highway adjacent to the Project. II. Bicvcle Routes Bicyclists will share internal streets with motor vehicles due to the anticipated low traffic volumes and limited speeds allowed on residential streets. Birch Road includes a bike lane (class II) adjacent to the curb. La Media Road includes a bike lane (class I) within the right-of-way on the road westerly side. 12. Public Buildings Public buildings are not proposed on the Project site as part of the community purpose facility locations. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The City Council hereby approves the Project subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "Boo, attached hereto. VI. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, revoke or further condition issuance of all future building permits issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. VII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions, or conditions are determined by a Court of compet~nt jurisdiction to 5 13-28 Resolution be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. Presented by Approved as to form by / Jim Sandoval Planning and Building Director 6 13-29 ~)(+-\ \ ß\\ "" r'\. 1/ ", 'I ~I, f I ¡ '1- ¡I' I ,~ i...' 111 II ~i E ~i] n: ¡ii! H q¡U t q1!i!!i ..t i i; q!;1 ~ nn~ ! G ä iiU ~ 1! !,ÌI !lli 1M !¡II! ¡¡II !¡j1:¡¡ ¡!~:ì!::!i! IIi! II: j¡ ij! II'!' i. ", ~¡¡ L II i ì! ~I ¡\li:1 II ~I:. 5;11:,: :: ;'.Iìd!t¡ ! ~ : \~rJ~ H f "' il' :iif II "In-.-li" " 11 11:1 ill .II·",! ¡¡i1~! I'! !·UI!¡.ï! . -I !!!II¡r-¡ !¡II . ~~ n_ ,. , !,I'!'I-': lill ,.1 I: 1111.':",1'11" I",: ¡}.¡ 'Ii . !!J!:!;i~ ! 1i ¡i!!,!!Ï!f¡!¡!¡ ¡i!~¡ill!¡ !lil!¡1 . ~ r, iiI" ~ ~~ e ~ ;¡I!¡,h!!!;!¡!!I!!¡m!¡!I!¡!1¡¡¡!I!I!!~!I!f;i!*!!,¡! !¡¡!i!l. I!I ¡! ~:¡~~¡!!¡ I ~~ I ~ II I '1 I. j~1 .iiY:' .. 'I' II!hi " ¡, ,,! , .( II' J i "I · ' ",.f ~ 1 ~' i" I' . ,.', ¡ I ; @;~~@ J I,: ilJll' < ¡ j ¡ ¡¡ ¡ IJ ¡',l ".7 ¡ ¡' H I; 1:'II !I::lrll J ~ J ¡ ¡ . . I . I"! ¡ "'!" ~. I \ \ J, ! II Ifbh . ! L I ¡ism. I ! ". u I Jtl- il ..hlh\hld f'-.. I 'J'!J' '!li", I" I 'I! 1 II t :11! ,. .. i1! t! Ii I it ~. 11 . I ¡ h I Ii ill I! d I: 'U'!d IIlli! III ¡II! ¡ h¡¡!!!iilll II j .II~'! !. J!lmm/¡¡! (!J Iii ¡ ~! I I !!1U!UI.l~ !~IIII··:·H!iJJtl.).~I~!lal'''''d'''1 c... ~.~. . 1 ""'"' . . .. ,. ~ :5 ~ . :~. w.....J ¡s >-~ ->-' !;: ð f- 1 <£ f- ZICI) w :> f-O::i °z~ w u 0«"- Z 0 Wa:~ :2: 0 "'>- ~ o ,I g:1 I! 1¡(,'li II II !!I.ill '---. . Ij I"'I' . . / ...11 I W--. I" il".'--f",,,..~.!¡¡¡¡ i ;~ I I ~~ ~ ¡', !:_ ~. í,~ I . Ii I" I 1< ~ ~ '. :i 'I:~ H ¡I----,.-L¡I·' '. ~ïl ! ,- ~t ! I! i~ I ~r I ,- >I <.. ' ¡' .' , . II to ¡q¡ ~ !i " I' ~... II ¡~ !;! ...-c II " r ¡ " f '" . " ··I! ¡ " II $"- . j r "'- II .-; Ii j ..- ~ It) ; ~ , ~ ¡ '" . I . w J: r-. , I! I ~~UJjl ~! ~<c¡-! I - . . ~ CC:) is· ·11 ., I' ffi~...J~ I_ šQ·J10}- u ., ~HI¡¡¡o> C)ii¡¡'~ ,I h:~ \ II ¡. ~~ ¡, iI.~ì j r ~~! ,I, ~~~ .1 " f I ¡" ~! , & r,1 ~~i q¡ .¡ii. , ¡ í ;~ : ì ~I ! ~ '" 13-30 ~ I ti . I' ¡. II ~ .r II I _!I, Iii ' ./ I ·1 ¡L I~ ii, ~ .. I! i; Ii /! Ii II" < ¡iIl¡'1 . I~ ~i :11 a., ~ I 'f! . 111.Um I ~I:J ,II II a!1! Ii I. I! 3 ~ II I' .I ÎI ¡ "I · !L ~ 'h is!! 1 ¡"lain I ~ ) p. ~ I! I i~ I~ ! ~ ~ G ~ " ., '-.... 1- w ,J.i i" Q. < "':¡:;I'- ~~w~f ~«C!J. ffia:·d ~ >..Jë ß«...Jð 01-_ ffio> ~ .. I ~ ~h , !< 1·1 ¡ _.., J ! 11111 I . ~ 13-31 ¡ "" '" IT .L33H5 335 NOLL ItnNliNOa !fOd 1,\~\\\\i\~\\\Î\\\\\\((./ \ . . ,'". ._.~ ;.\:,\>i~'.'~ "~':. f,:,.\;w:\. \\!,11 ,:1,'\ '.. - ~. . .1:., ".. . '-, J .':. \'.' , .,., ...."...~--=....'~...."' . -- Hw;¡; . \\.~~\.\)\i\·~~~>riiI-';\!, '~'~'~::',_>::":<.:~~;'.\~\\*~~,~- 'I'! ~\\\ I' \. If - "\" \Ii.' "",ç.:.. .. ..··.':\1.,. \.\,\\,\1. ¡IIII I . \t h'..:""" ·"1·\,·..·\ I ,\\\¡;\ '1\\\' I 1/. 0 .j1\. \1",'.,"".1:"'\\'\\ '. 't' \ ~i¡l ,~\¡\\I\\\\\\\~ì¡i\\IUif ~W '\V\.i¡q' ¡:.iI\\\r\Ù\\\"\'\.:'t. \:.'~, '1\i.\li,\\\;~·\,\ :',\,\,'.\.\\,;, ~~ ," 1.:I··~:;i!i!!¡:i,¡.I\\·:·\\<.\)·::':'.\ '¡'Ihl\ 11\\ ~':\\'ì"\ ... 0 ,~¡ 1/ ~lií¡"I;)I¡\il \ i\'\:'::"\~'¡"~' . , ,\\II! 1'\ ì\ \ ,.\\\'\1\." ... :> i . ¥:'. i:'!~ ;:;/)11;'1,': ., ¡,! I JU!I!.I'¡ '\II'~' \\ \\\\¡\I"\ ,,' ~" 'I' ", _ "I':";!!I "¡'. 'I' \\\\\1\1\, "11",1,\, h !:~J-.-'c' .':~- ·;'.:;::':i!tJ¡"::."·<::·:'l.1 . ':\,A ¡fJ,\ I'" "I" '/A . '~'., . I; \;\\'II\\~\,\\\I;':'\ \!:.~ _.....__~-;~. :.jj:. ~ I~ ~}\W:~\\.::"::·.':':" \ ·t, "~;~)' <1,',. ..\1 \1111\\\'\1\'''''_ .\ - ¡. /(11",' :. ¡",,If; ~ I iJi ¡1·,\,.\··..:,· , ~. .. " Í/".!pifi \ '1"[\1"\\\.'.;" t,.." .~I. "~'.'ff:II:~'11i 'I \: II,..,.., ' ~. '4 'It I'll' I' \. .1.',";"". I)..... :r7'lj:~)\tr.\\\':~'r.:II:~f¡ \\\ It:::- -/ ' :' Ii \\~,\\ \I¡ 191, " Q. .. ¡i:li!¡< ~ J:'" ! "/.",, >"UJ·I , 'i. '11 '" ¡::~ 'I ,+';/.'1',,0 <Z,n:> , '/;f,!ii I ~«V·· -. _,>...:~f. ,';' ~ ~ ;::5g ~;(~.:,. ~ ~¡5...Jð ;1:::'.~_-.:':",__ U ffi 0> ~ .. .:~;': ' . ..... '--- . '--_0' _P.: it I ¡ ~;) . 'Ii ! _", ,.I ì 11111 ",-' - ,'.,.:.: ,-(l,!IIi'I'! <-, "ì!f;,.,1!(', " ,J''f:.¡r~¡,\\\\\ .. . .,;\;C'~~},:;?~'~\(t . "'I,ït;J,· "'76""'.\1", .... "':. 'I.íj!)Þ·/.·J'!:-·~.~~;,d"'I'::· . ,.,.". \. ".<i!-.,~'~. "-'} ~ '. ~ '. , ' .,/~;?~~~,:Jt)~r ,\ "'.,,', F'" '!I~ -.,,__ \ t '»(" ,,/ / // II·; , 0:;/ '~~/... Ii! . .-, ..,~»~;< ;¡ 'i{W,',;~¡,:' ". >. ~ )~ '" ... lli J: '" lli '" ;e: o .. ¡::: -.~", ~ ...J::~ " 'i.l. :) ¡rf;~. d ( I. " e \J\~ :<V· . .! ;1IfE=~~>: , . ~ "J" '....J '\. ;i ~t '·i-':'~·,:.?·!'~ :s ~ ',," ~..I, . r " '<-0;;7' . ~ \~~;~~,.~:~'f'""i Y· .l' 'I :I: ,', ~~tf J~""" ... . ~ ,-,):,~;.~. :..... -~&-(¥i3.\'. .... .. ;,-,¿, ~\?:i'¡~ -i'i~,{ ~); :)\,J?~:~~,<~t:.1Þ)~'~ " f..A".¡,' \ ,~"~,.¡ ¡r:::: ~ -~. ....." ,/ '''~'f,\,\~~Jj.tJ'i, '....,_ _'_/'I'l)\ro~~'"î~~~ :-..\~, '~ ;/ : { ". ';;:-!f§~"'. ~\'¡('.. '.,' , I.. -~, -, "h, " i /' t.!. ~--:~ -_-~- _:~. ~~M';:'l~' :,,\\ '\~ ".... - - ;,~:t~i\ ~~~. >. "..>~~'t{3;'::::'... ' \\~ ;~:",:.~':};:;.~}" .' "'",',' .,:., ,\..''''>" '~'" '>~ -'~-'- '. " .......-,..j'I\·' "~~""~- ' It·i'.'p}~?~lt~\"f~~~'\\~~?~~!!\, ,. .,~= . ,'1\':\ .,:-.",~,I.~.,...,,,,,;.~_,,,.';\i~~~,,,,.:.,., ": ,_' "N.l'.·.',;" ,"..., ~ ..," ¡II~~\I .:=-=::",.,>C/," ',,'~~'-"'>.:,~":_-_: _. ,·"'""~~"'-~~-..::·tr .11\\. ~,,<í~:~~~~~jt~~~ 13-32 " .- .' n .'. .....:.""';..;:: "'-~' -. ) i\,\\\\n\\\\\H\\\H[\1\\\\1t"U1H((Ii¡f('{--,:· \ '\)1¡ ¡\\\\\\Ù\'\\:,\\Y\\\\\\\\\ \\\\i¡\i}.\\¡{{! (-'" (,\:; 1'\;\1\\\',,,ùJ;\~\\\ UHH\\'.',l:!'.' ," ~,-I: "!_;:;\1f:"'-",':\1~~ P\\\!¡¡¡¡¡¡1!1':j ",--, "":' ", ·"1" !1"I"lf,!1 '_I: ::"",1,";))'1,:,1; \ill. "1\1'; "'ii';,!II¡p,¡:,iP'; ¡;¡ ¡llilnil'¡ i! ..' ":'!",'f.;>;';':j:':/';' i,:'¡t);¡};¡;\\;'_ii.\ '1 [Ii)";,'.,'!, " :li o:d!' Ji ',' . ',,;!" ···r'/-· . . ...... . ,-...,..+-.-.., ~, . ; ';;:.'/; ~ I,i ¡i!. I . 1''''/ ' ;\)1(.'/ ," ·f R\\(\~\\\!~_ t ..' - --," '\I) \\" ,I' 'to ,=_;Z" ~"'4.7'''''''''1 ~ 11(.','1,\1'01\"\ II, ih,l \ \" .,\ ' {\\!\t\\\\\).~')i\~· U' .Ù\\¡\\\\\\·'Ù;\I/:, ~u.r' ~\'\!.'I\\\\Ù;\( ,\\\.; ¡...::¡...;; ~V!\\",\\\\\\Ùi.\ ,I ~ti) i\'i'i\\\\\\\\'\;,\\\~?\ : '. ..,.-." 'i ,. ',. ) , . II 'I I I , i i i¡ !' ¡¡ ,11'1 , ' !! ~I ~~ F. '. .,..- '->.;'- ---- --' :...-- ,.~ .- .~ - ..:-:..... " .\.. I 'I ' I. i ;L ~I rr I ff " !! \ ¡" , ~ I' ~, , .-i..·. "·~"ID!! 2:'/ï:;:::\\;;;':;;>~: '. . . \. . \ \, \.;;\ ~ \\\ \ , ..\' --, .. "._. -¡\'\I!]li\\\\\\u\\\\"\' "< -_",\1\..1.\.".\, '. .' .-:-:_\\'\\)¡I\i\\V ..... '.. . ". .\~'~~'<~::~\::.~:'\".'.,.' "'. . , ... " I -._".,- -'.'i" ~, '1', .... ,>it/' '. ! , i~ . æ l:l~ I' ¡ . 13-33 '. ~ . ! i ~.¡ ; ;.' II " ! '. ~ .. .-.' " d' r: .i . ,. I ~~ oj. Î~: ~ ~ Q .... .... I!. ~ . , '" H~ , õ< .1 ;¡ ~j t¡¡ ¡ï ~ , U it n.ç II I. .. !~ d '-. . I ¡. lo:f"~1t) ~:z:"" ¡ ~~Wl g<(ji .,a:ctõ 1->..Jõ5 ß«-I6 CI-_ 150> :i ¡ ~I:) ! tilll illl!! f mmffiRI í\\ ~_ II~ __m___~:' ~~ J',.-~ ~.~,- ¡ b:m:rr:i \' - - \ I ¡ .' I: ~I ~~ ¡: ·1 it h "i ~i Iii ¡¡ !~ !' i! il ~ ,: !~ ;;1(., Iii::~ ; ;, \ \. , , I , ! ' : ,I il I ¡f 'J', !~ I; !~ ~ ì' ." rf~ IÞi¡ " " '~ II i'l i! Ii r. I'~!I 1!"19 ~ !1 i!¡ ~ !I! " ~ " ~ 'lIþ Ii!' " ,I.. 'I' i; ",I. !i, 'i I! , ',llil ',bi! 3 Ii! "'; ',- . ~ 1: ' :fI~ 'it> r¡ ¡'Ii n:l" !il, !I, ¡'I ¡¡I", !~I h"j¡~ ì~n ¡Ii (, ~ !I I' I. . IOIU "hI, t ¡g li!!1 :!~ if II ~¡ !,! ~fi~l¡ ¡'J Iii I!¡ II II'! ¡II Hm !, Ij',! S" ! ¡ii ¡I! 111 ¡I!! !i! !il !~ I!! !II!! IMI b ~"'~<; <; ~~<O!<I<I~ i ", .", ; ~ i ~ ~:r:""" { -õ<üup ~ ~~~¡f o I!:! >.Jõ >--: :¡¡~..Jõ > c~_ u ¡fio> " .. ~- . . mø: "I . ¡~¡ I" ~ ~., ,II !lIi!! :~ > ; . ' ! 'to ¡ ~~ i ¡¡:~. i f .,' -<0::;"'''-.1 :,-jE;;!::: ~ ,::,'.1', '" ~ //~ / . . ? // ,. f; '. ~. ':<. ~ ,,- 1_"\ 'é. ~_. ~ ~ ~. ~ 13-34 Exhibit "B" Otay Ranch Village Seven Revised Tentative Subdivision Map (C.V.T.05-09A) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless otherwise specified or required by law: (a) the conditions and Code requirements set forth below shall be completed prior to the related Final Map as determined by the Director of Planning and Building, the City Engineer, and the Director of General Services (b) unless otherwise specified, "dedicate" means grant the appropriate easement, rather than fee title. Where an easement is required the Applicant shall be required to provide subordination of any prior lien and easement holders in order to ensure that the City has a first priority interest and rights in such land unless otherwise excused by the City. Where fee title is granted or dedicated to the City, said fee title shall be fiee and clear of all encumbrances, unless otherwise excused by the City. Should conflicting wording or standards occur between these conditions of approval, any conflict shall be resolved by the City Manager or designee. GENERAL/PRELIMINARY 1. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Developer as to any or all of the Property. For purposes of this documènt the term "Developer" shall also mean "Applicant". (Planning) 2. The Applicant shall comply with all requirements and guidelines of the City of Chula Vista General Plan; the City's Growth Management Ordinance; Chula Vista Landscape Manual; Chula Vista Design Manual; Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan, Phase 1 and Phase 2; Ranch Wide Affordable Housing Plan; Otay Ranch Overall Design Plan; Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) and Tentative Maps (TMs) Final Second-Tier Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR 04-06) and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and addendums to FEIR-04-06; Otay Ranch Village Seven Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and supporting documents including: Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP); Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan; SPA Affordable Housing Plan, Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP), Water Conservation Plan (WCP); and the Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan as amended fiom time to time, unless specifically modified by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager. These plans may be subject to minor modifications by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager, however, any material modifications shall be subject to approval by the City Council. (Planning) 3. If any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modifY all approvals herein granted including issuance of building permits, deny, or further condition the subsequent approvals that are derived fiom the approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to cómpel their compliance with said conditions or 13-35 Page I of33 seek damages for their violation. The Applicant shall be notified 10 days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City. (Planning) 4. Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities and costs, including attorney's fees, arising fiom challenges to the Village Seven SPA, Tentative Maps, and Second Tier EIR (EIR 04-06) and subsequent environmental review for the Project and any or all entitlements and approvals issued by the City in connection with the Project. (Planning) 5. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Village Seven SPA conditions of approval, (PCM 04-05) as may be amended fiom time to time. (Planning) 6. Prior to the approval of the first "A" Map for the Project, Applicant shall prepare and submit, to the satisfaction of, and as deemed necessary by the Director of Planning and Building, an updated Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, and supporting regulating documents including, but not limited to text, exhibits, and tables for the Village Seven SPA Plan; Planned Community District Regulations; Village Design Plan; Public Facilities Finance Plan; Affordable Housing Plan Air Quality Improvement Plan; Water Conservation Plan; Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan; Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan; and applicable environmental documents. (Planning) 7. Any and all agreements that the Applicant is required to enter in hereunder shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. (Planning) 8. A reserve fund program has been established by Resolution No. 18288 for the funding of the Fiscal Impact of New Development (F.I.N.D.) Model for the Otay Ranch Project. The Applicant shall provide funds to the Reserve Fund as required by the Reserve Fund Program. Pursuant to the provisions of the Growth Management Ordinance and the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), the Applicant shall participate in the funding of the preparation of an annual report monitoring the development of the community of Otay Ranch. The annual monitoring report will analyze the supply of, and demand for, public facilities and services governed by the threshold standards. An annual review shall commence following the first fiscal year in which residential occupancy occurs in the Project and is to be completed during the second quarter of the following fiscal year. The annual report shall adhere to the GDP/SRP, as amended fiom time-to-time. (Planning) 9. In accordance with mitigation measure 4.3-2 of the Final EIR 04-06 and Addendum to FEIR 04-06, the City within Village Seven may issue no more than 400 building permits prior to the completion of SR125 to the International Border. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may issue additional building permits if the City Council, in its sole discretion, determines that each of the following conditions have been met: 1) SRI25 is constructed and open between SR54 and Olympic Parkway; and 2) traffic studies, prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Council, demonstrate that the opening of SR125 to Olympic Parkway provides additional capacity to mitigate the project's cumulatively significant traffic impacts to a level below significance without exceeding GMOC traffic threshold standards. Altematively, the City may issue building permits if the City Council, in it's sole discretion, has approved an alternative method to implement the City's Growth Management Ordinance, as may be amended fiom time to time. (Engineering) 13-36 PaRe 2 of 33 10. The Applicant shall comply with the terms of the Conveyance Agreement, as may be amended fiom time to time, adopted by Resolution No. 18416 by the City Council on October 22, 1996 ("Conveyance Agreement"), to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. (Planning) ENVIRONMENTAL II. The Applicant shall implement, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building and Environmental Review Coordinator, all environmental impact mitigation measures identified in Final EIR 04-06 (SCH# 2003111 050) and addendums, the candidate CEQA Findings and MMRP for this Project. (Planning) 12. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements of the California Department of Fish and Game, the California State Water Resources Quality Control Board, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.s. Army Corps of Engineers. Prior to any activity that may potentially impact biological resources, such as clearing and grubbing, the Applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements prescribed in Final EIR 04-06 (SCH# 2003111050) andMMRP. (Planning) 13. The Applicant shall apply for and receive a take permit/authorization fiom the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Califomia Department of Fish and Game, or comply with the approved City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan, if applicable to the Project. (Planning) 14. Prior to the approval of each final "B" Map for the Project, the Applicant shall comply with all requirements and policies of the Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan (RMP) as approved by City Council on October 28, 1993, and Otay Ranch, Phase 2 Resource Management Plan (RMP2) and "Preserve Conveyance Schedule," as approved by City Council on June 4, 1996, and as may be amended fiom time to time by the City. (Planning) 15. Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit (including clearing and grubbing) for the Project, the Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the RMP, Phase Two, Range Management Plan to the satisfaction ofthe Director of Planning and Building. (Planning) 16. Simultaneously with conveyance ofland to the Preserve Owner/Manager (POM) in fee title or by easement, the Applicant shall cease all cattle grazing on the land to be conveyed. In addition, the Applicant shall ensure through the maintenance of existing fencing or gating, if sufficient, or the construction of new fencing or gating, if deemed necessary by the City, that cattle fiom adjacent areas cannot access the land being conveyed. In addition, Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the RMP, Phase Two, Range Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Director ofPlanÍ1Íng and Building. (Planning) 17. Prior to the approval of each final "B" Map for the Project, Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Village Seven SPA Plan Agricultural Plan. (Planning) I 8. The Developer agrees to convey fee title, or upon the consent of the Preserve Owner/ Manager (POM) and any lien holder, an easement restricting use of the land to those permitted by the Otay Ranch Resource Man.agement Plan (RMP), to the POM upon the recordation of each Final Map for an amount of land equal to the Final Map's obligation to 13-37 Page 3 of33 convey land to the Preserve. Where an easement is conveyed, the Developer agrees to provide subordination of any prior lien holders in order to ensure that the POM has a first priority interest in such land. Where consent and subordination cannot be obtained, the Developer shall convey fee title. Where fee title or an easement is conveyed, access to the satisfaction of the POM shall also be conveyed. Where an easement is granted, each Final Map is subject to a condition that fee title shall be granted upon demand by the POM. The developer further agrees to maintain and manage the offered conveyance property consistent with Phase I and 2 RMP guidelines until such time when the POM has accepted the conveyance property. (Planning) 19. Prior to approval of the first "B" Map for the Project, at the request of the City Engineer, Developer shall take all necessary steps to include the Proj ect area within Improvement Area "A" of the Otay Ranch Preserve Maintenance District (CFD. No. 97-02). (Engineering) SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 20. In accordance with mitigation measure 4.4-1 of the Final EIR 04-06 and associated MMRP, an acoustical study confirming wall geometrics and conformance with the City's noise threshold for residential units along Birch Road and La Media Road shall be approved by the Environmental Review Coordinator prior to grading permit. A noise barrier plan shall be prepared in conformance with the aforementioned study as well as the noise analysis contained in Final EIR 04-06 and the associated MMRP. The noise barrier plan shall be submitted for review and receive approval by the Director of Planning and Building, Environmental Review Coordinator, Director of Public Works and Director of General Services prior to issuance of the first grading permit for the Project. This noise barrier plan shall be incorporated into the wall and fence plan, a component of the Landscape Master Plan. Should Developer request modification of the approved wall and fence plans, Developer shall provide additional acoustical analysis ifrequired by the Director of Planning and Building and Environmental Review Coordinator. Noise barriers shall be constructed within dedicated open space lots and shall not be constructed on private property unless a MHOA is formed to maintain sound barriers to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the Environmental Review Coordinator. (Environmental, Engineering) 21. Unless required noise barriers are constructed, no building permits shall be issued for those lots within the noise contour of 65 CNEL or greater as described in the Acoustical Impact Analysis by Giroux & Associates, dated June 1, 2004 and the Noise Technical Report for Otay Ranch Village Seven by RECON, dated February 23, 2004, unless earlier modified by agreement with the City of Chula Vista and Applicant. (Environmental, Engineering) 22. Applicant shall make a good-faith effort to coordinate development and implementation of the Village Seven SPA Plan Area with all other developers/applicants within Village Seven including phasing, grading, improvements and dedication of right-of-way. (Planning) 23. The following conditions of approval are based upon the project having multiple Final Maps for the entire subdivision, which shall be referenced hereinafter as "Final 'B' Maps". A Final "B" Map is defined as a final subdivision or parcel map, filed in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Chula Vista Municipal Code, which proposes to subdivide land into individual single or multi-family lots, or contains a subdivision of the multi-family lots shown on the Tentative Map. The "B" Map shall be in substantial conformance with the 13-38 Page 4 0[33 related approved final "A" Map. Unless otherwise specified, all conditions and code requirements listed below shall be fully completed to the City's reasonable satisfaction prior to approval of the first Final 'B' Map. (Engineering) 24. Prior to approval of the first final "B" Map for the Project within the Tentative Map, the developer may submit and obtain the approval of the City of a master Final Map ("A" Map) over the portion of the tentative map within each area showing "super block" lots corresponding to the units and phasing or combination of units and phasing thereof. Said "A" Map shall also show open space lot dedications, the backbone street dedications and utility easements required to serve the "super block" lots created by this "A" Map. All "super block" lots created by this "A" Map or parcel map shall have access to a dedicated public street. A lot line adjustment, if utilized in accordance with City standards and procedures, shall not be considered the first "A" Map. The "A" Map may contain single-family residential units. An "A" Map shall not be considered the first Final Map as indicated in the conditions of approval unless said Map contains single family lots, stock co-operative, community apartment, condominium lots or multi-family lots as shown. (Engineering) 25. The subsequent development of a multi-family lot which does not require the filing of a "B" Map shall meet, prior to issuance of a building permit for that lot, all the applicable conditions of approval of the tentative map, as determined by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 26. In the event of a filing of a final 'B' Map which requires oversizing of the improvements necessary to serve other properties within the Project, said Final Map shall be required to install all necessary improvements to serve the project plus the necessary oversizing of facilities required to serve such other properties (in accordance with the restrictions of state law and City ordinances). (Engineering) DESIGN 27. Any proposed monumentationlsignage shall be consistent with the Village Seven Village Design Plan and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building prior to approval of the appropriate Final Map. (Planning) 28. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Applicant shall submit for review and approval a sign program to the Director of Planning and Building. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Applicant shall post temporary signs on all neighborhoods within the Project indicating the future land use(s) for said sites with signage consistent with the sign program. Temporary signs shall be maintained in place until such time as a project is approved for any such future land use site. (Planning) 29. In addition to the requirements outlined in the City of Chula Vista Landscape Manual, privately maintained slopes in excess of 25 feet in height shall be landscaped and irrigated to soften their appearance as follows: one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 1,500 square feet of slope area, one I-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 square feet of slope area, and appropriate groundcover. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary the slope plane. Landscape and irrigation plans for private slopes shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building prior to approval of the corresponding Final Map. (Planning, General Services) 13-39 Page 5 of33 30. Street parkways shall be no less than 7.5 feet in width for the planting area, except as approved by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall plant trees within said parkways which have been selected fiom the list of appropriate tree species described in the Village Seven Design Plan, Village Seven SPA Plan and Landscape Master Plan and shall be approved by the Directors of Planning and Building, General Services and Public Works. The Applicant shall provide root barriers and deep watering irrigation systems for the trees, as approved by the Director of General Services and the Director of Public Works. (Planning, General Services) 31. The Applicant shall install all street trees in accordance with Section 18.28.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. All street trees shall be planted in parkways, or as otherwise approved by the Director of Planning and Building. Prior to the installation of any dry utilities, including but not limited to cable, telephone, gas or electric lines, Applicant agrees to complete preliminary street improvement plans that show the location of all future street trees, which will be subject to the review and approval of the Director of General Services and the Director of Planning & Building. Prior to any utility installation, wood stakes shall be placed by the Applicant on site according to approved preliminary street tree plans and shall be painted a bright color and labeled as future street tree location. Applicant further agrees to provide City documentation, acceptable by the Director of General Services and the Director of Planning and Building, that all utility companies have been given notice that no dry utility line shall be located within five feet of the wood stake in any direction. Applicant will maintain street tree identification stakes in the locations as shown on approved preliminary plans until all dry utilities are in place. A street tree improvement plan shall be submitted for review and subject to the approval of the Director of Planning and Building and the City Engineer prior to or concurrent with the second submittal of street improvement plans within the subdivision. Approval of the street tree improvement plans shall constitute final approval of the selection of street trees for the street parkways. (Engineering, Planning, General Services) 32. Prior to the first Final Map for the Project, Applicant shall submit to and obtain approval by the City Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building a SPA-wide signage plan, if such plan has not been already produced by the Applicant for another Final Map within the SPA. Such plan shall address trails, cart and off-street bicycle circulation and street crossing. Such plan shall include sign colors, materials, heights, location and lighting. Applicant shall install approved signs concurrent with related improvements or upon request by the City. (Engineering, Planning) 13-40 PaQe 6 of33 PUBLIC FACILITIES, UTILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS AND PHASING (Streets, Transit, Sewer, Water, Drainage, Grading) 33. Developer shall dedicate for public use all the public streets shown on the tentative map within the subdivision boundary. Prior to the approval of the first "A" Map and those "B" Maps, which trigger improvements as set forth in the Village Seven PFFP, the Applicant shall construct or enter into an agreement to construct and secure all street improvements as required by the PFFP, as may be amended fiom time to time. The Developer shall construct the public improvements and provide security satisfactory to the City Engineer and City Attorney. (Engineering) 34. Construct a protective fencing system at the inlets and outlets of storm drain structures, as and when directed by the City Engineer. The [mal fencing design and types of construction materials shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. (Engineering) 35. Construct energy dissipators at all storm drain outlets as required by the City Engineer to maintain non-erosive flow velocities. (Engineering) 36. Prior to approval of each Final Map for the Project, acquire and then grant to the City all off- site rights-of-way and easements necessary for the installation of required street improvements and/or utilities, subject to the City's Subdivision Ordinance and the State Subdivision Map Act. (Engineering) 37. Concurrent with approval of each Final Map for the Project, the Applicant shall submit Improvement Plans for the applicable neighborhood for review and approval by the City Engineer, Director of General Services and the Director of PI arming and Building. Applicant shall secure in accordance with Section 18.16.220 of the Municipal Code, as necessary, the construction and/or construct full street improvements for all on-site and off-site streets as identified in the Otay Ranch Village Seven SPA PFFP, as may be amended fiom time to time and as deemed necessary to provide service to the subject subdivision. Said improvements shall include, but not be limited to, asphalt concrete pavement, base, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, sewer, reclaimed water and water utilities, drainage facilities, street lights, traffic signals, signs, landscaping, irrigation, fencing, fire hydrants and street light locations, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The amount of the security for required improvements, including landscape and irrigation plans, shall be 110% times a construction cost estimate approved by the City Engineer and the Director of General Services ifrelated plans have been approved by the City, 150% times the approved cost estimate if related plans are being processed by the City or 200% times the construction cost estimate approved by the City Engineer and the Director of General Services if related plans have not been submitted for City review. The landscape and irrigation (L&I) bond, at a minimum, shall be based on a 90% complete Landscape Master Plan, to the satisfaction of the Director of General Services. A lesser percentage of bonding may be allowed if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Director of General Services that sufficient data or other information is available to warrant such reduction. (Engineering, General Services) 38. Uponapproval of the final "B" Map for tht:' Project that triggers the Cumulative DU's, ("Table 'A''') below, consistent with the Village Seven PFFP, as may be amended fiom time 13-41 Page 7 on 3 to time, Developer shall construct or enter into an agreement to construct and secure, in accordance with Section 18.16.220 of the Municipal Code, the required street improvements: (Engineering) Table "A" Village Seven Public Facilities Matrix Public facilities required to be constructed by Village Seven And cumulative unit tri!1!1ers Facility Description Cumulative Roadway Unit Tri!1!1ersl I La Media fiom Birch Road to Santa Luna Street l' 2 Santa Luna Street fiom La Media Rd. to MalZdalena Ave. I' 3 Magdalena Avenue - Birch Road to Webber Road 1 4 Magdalena Avenue - Webber Road to Wolf Canvon Drive 120 5 Magdalena Ave. - WolfCanvon Loop to Fleishbein Fred A St. 200 6 Ma"dalena Avenue - Fleishbein Fred A. St. to Santa Luna St. 1 (J) 7 Rock Mountain Rd. - Half Width La Media to SR-125 (2) 8 Sidewalk alonlZ south side of Birch Rd. (4) (I) Developer shaH agree to construct and to secure the facility prior to the Final Map that triggers the cumulative DU's or EDU's as defined in this TabJe. (2) The ROW for these improvements wilJ be dedicated prior to the approval of the first Final Map as provided in the PFFP: if a grading pennit for the High School site has been issued, or the High School project is approved by the Division of the State Architect. Developer shall agree to construct and secure the improvements prior to the approval of the first Final Map. The time to perfonn the construction of these improvements may be extended by the City Engineer. (3) The number of units prior to construction of these facilities may be increased at the sole discretion of the City Engineer, but in no event in excess of 350 units in all of the Village Seven project, in accordance with the PFFP as follows: I) if it is determined that the enrollment in High School is less than or equal to 1,600; and 2) a traffic study is submitted to and approved by the City Engineer that demonstrates that the intersection of Birch Road and Magdalena Ave. will meet both LOS and design standards criteria; and 3) Developer shall provide evidence that grading operations for these facilities are substantially completed and that roadway improvements for these facilities are progressing adequate1y toward completion. (4) Upon completion of the grading along Birch Rd. the sidewalk shall be constructed in accordance with the approved Improvement Plans for Birch Rd. 39. Street cross sections shall conform to the cross sections shown on the tentative map, unless otherwise conditioned or approved herein. All other design criteria shall comply with the current Chula Vista Design Standards, Chula Vista Street Design Standards, and the Chula Vista Subdivision Manual unless otherwise conditioned or approved herein. (Engineering) 40. The Applicant shall participate in the funding of revisions of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) Program, which shall be prepared by the City, as directed and requested by the City Manager or his designee and subject to the approval of the City Council. The Applicant will receive appropriate credit for such participation. (Engineering) 41. Prior to approval of any Final Map for the Proj ect which triggers the installation of the related street improvements, Applicant shall enter into an agreement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, to construct and secure fully activated traffic signals, including interconnected wiring, at the following intersections: 13-42 Pa"e 8 of33 INTERSECTIONS · La Media Road and Santa Luna · Wolf Canyon Loop and Magdalena Avenue · Ma¡¡dalena A venue and Peabodv . · Magdalena A venue and Santa Luna · Rock Mountain Rd. and Magdalena Ave. The applicant shall fully design the aforementioned traffic signal in conjunction with the improvement plans for the related streets. The developer shall install underground improvements, standards and luminaries in conjunction with the construction of the applicable street improvements. In addition, the Applicant shall install mast arm, signal heads, and associated equipment when traffic signals warrant as determined by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 42. Submit to and obtain approval by the City Engineer of striping plans for all promenade, collector or higher classification streets simultaneously with the associated improvement plans. (Engineering) 43. The Applicant shall comply with the Fire Department's codes and policies for Fire Prevention, and the recommendations contained in the approved Fire Protection Plan, Urban- Wild land Interface Area for Village Seven, as may be amended fiom time to time. Prior to the approval of the first Final Map, a fire access and water supply plan prepared by a licensed engineering firm, which has been determined to be qualified in the sole discretion of the Fire Marshall, shall be submitted to for approval by the City OfChula Vista Fire Department. The plan shall detail how and when the Applicant shall provide the following items either prior to the issuance of building permit(s) for the Project, or prior to delivery of combustible materials on any construction site on the Proj ect, whichever occurs earlier: a. Water supply consisting of fire hydrants as approved and indicated by the Fire Department during plan check to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Any temporary water supply source is subject to prior approval by the Fire Marshal. b. Emergency vehicle access consisting of a minimum first layer of hard asphalt surface or concrete surface, with a minimum standard width of 15 feet. c. Street signs installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Temporary street signs shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and Fire Department. Locations and identification of temporary street signs shall be subject to review and approval by the , City Engineer and Fire Department. (Fire, Planning, Engineering) 44. Depending on the location of improvements such as cul-de-sacs, alleys, driveways or when special circumstances exist in a subdivision design, as determined by the Fire Marshal, the Applicant shall install additional fire hydrants upon request and to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. (Fire, Planning, Engineering) 45. Construct a temporary turnaround or street. improvements, upon the request of and as determined necessary by the City Engineer "and Fire Marshal, at the end of temporarily 13-43 Page 9 of 33 stubbed streets greater than 150 ft. in length (as measured fiom the nearest street centerline intersection). (Engineering) 46. Design all vertical and horizontal curves and intersection sight distances to conform to the CalTrans Highway Design Manual. All streets, which intersect other streets at or near horizontal or vertical curves, must meet intersection design sight distance requirements in accordance with City standards. Sight distance easements shall be granted as necessary to comply with the requirements in the CalTrans Highway Design Manual and City of Chula Vista policies, where a conflict exists, the City of Chula Vista policies shall prevail. Lighted SAG vertical curves may be permitted, with the approval of the City Engineer, at intersections per American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards. (Engineering) 47. Prior to approval of each Final Map for the Project, the Engineer-of-Work shall submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer a waiver request for all subdivision design items not specifically waived on the Tentative Map, and not conforming to adopted City standards. The Engineer-of-work request shall outline the requested subdivision design deviations from adopted City standards and state that in hisfher professional opinion, no safety issues will be compromised. The waiver is subject to approval by the City Engineer in the City Engineer's sole discretion. (Engineering) 48. Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City, prior to the approval of the first Map for the Project whereby the developer agrees to the following: a. Fund and install Chula Vista transit stop facilities within the tentative map boundary when directed by the Director of Public Works. The improvement plans for said stops shall be prepared in accordance with the transit stop details described in the Village Seven Design Plan and Village Seven PFFP and as approved by the Directors of Planning and Building and Public Works. b. Not protest the formation of any future regional benefit assessment district to finance the MTDB San Diego Trolley, BRT System or other transit system. (Engineering) 49. Alleys shall be constructed to City of Chula Vista standards. (Engineering) 50. The developer shall construct sidewalks and construct pedestrian ramps on all walkways to meet applicable "Americans with Disabilities Act" standards and as approved by the City Engineer. In the event the Federal Government adopts ADA standards for street rights-of- way, which are in conflict with the standards and approvals contained herein, all such approvals conflicting with those standards shall be updated to reflect those standards. Unless otherwise required by federal law, City ADA standards may be considered vested, as determined by Federal regulations, after construction has commenced. (Engineering) 51. The Applicant shall not install privately owned water, reclaimed water, or other utilities crossing any public street. The installation of sleeves for future construction of privately owned facilities may be allowed subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer if the following is accomplished: 13-44 Pa¡ze 10 of33 a. The developer enters into an agreement with the City where the developer agrees to the following: \. Apply for an encroachment permit for installation of the private facilities within the public right-of-way; and, II. Maintain membership in an advance notice such as the USA Dig Alert Service; and, 111. Mark out any private facilities owned by the developer whenever work is performed in the area; and, IV. The terms of this agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the developer. b. Shutoff devices as determined by the City Engineer are provided at those locations where private facilities traverse public streets. (Engineering) 52. Street names shall be as on the approved tentative map, or as otherwise approved by the Director of Planning and Building and City Engineer. (Planning, Engineering) 53. Prior to issuance of any grading permit based on plans proposing the creation of down slopes adjacent to public or private streets, Applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's approval of a study to determine the necessity of providing guardrail improvements at those locations. Applicant shall construct and secure any required guardrail improvements in conjunction with the associated construction permit as determined by and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The guardrail shall be installed per CalTrans Traffic Manual and Roadside Design Guide requirements and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (Engineering) 54. Prior to approval of each Final Map for the Project, Applicant shall agree to install permanent street name signs, and shall install such signs prior to the issuance of the first building permit for production homes for the applicable Final Map. (Engineering) 55. Left and right tum storage lengths shall be provided as recommended in the Linscott, Law and Greenspan Traffic Study for Village Seven, dated June 7, 2004, or as required by the City Engineer (Engineering). 56. Prior to the approval of the first Final Map, the applicant shall secure the installation of one permanent traffic count station by making a cash deposit in the amount of $17,500. (Engineering) GRADING AND DRAINAGE 57. The Applicant shall provide drainage improvements in accordance with the Master Drainage Study for Otay Ranch Village Seven, dated May 20,2004, and the Preliminary Water Quality Technical Report for Otay Ranch Village Seven, dated May 21, 2004 or a subsequent Hydrology Study submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall maintain all such drainage improvements until said improvements are formally accepted by the City or an applicable maintenance district, or other mechanism as approved by the City. Said maintenance shall ensure that drainage facilities will continue to operate as designed. (Engineering) 13-45 Page 11 of33 58. Prior to approval of any grading permit or any other grant of approval for constructing the proposed extended detention and water quality basins, whichever occurs earlier, the Applicant shall demonstrate that the design of the proposed extended detention and water quality basins would reduce the 2-, 10- and 100-year post-development peak flows, to any natural drainage course to an amount not exceeding pre-development conditions, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer (Engineering) 59. Storm drain systems that collect water fiom private property shall be designated private on grading and drainage and/or improvement plans to the point of connection with a public system or to the point at which storm water that is collected fiom public street right-of-way, public park or open space areas is first introduced into the system. Downstream fiom that point, the storm drain system shall be public. An encroachment permit shall be processed and approved by the City for private storm drains within the public right-of-way or within C.F.D. maintained Open Space lots. (Engineering) 60. Submit with grading and drainage and/or improvement plans, as applicable, hydrologic and hydraulic studies and calculations, including dry lane calculations for all public streets. Calculations shall also be provided to demonstrate the adequacy of downstream drainage structures, pipes and inlets. (Engineering) 61. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit which impacts off-site property, the Applicant shall deliver to the City, a notarized letter of permission to grade and drain for all off-site grading. (Engineering) 62. Storm drain design shall conform to the requirements of the Subdivision Manual and the Grading Ordinance as may be amended fiom time to time. (Engineering) 63. Provide improved all-weather access with H-20 loading, based on a minimum traffic index (TI) of 5, to all public storm drain clean-outs or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 64. All City maintenance access roads shall be 12' min. width and designed for H-20 (min. TI of 5) loading. Provide a minimum of 6-inch thick PCC (reinforced with #4 BAR at 18" on center each way) and heavy broom finish for any access road with grades of 8% or greater. Access roads greater than 5% but less than 8% must, at minimum, be asphalt concrete designed to carry H-20 loading. All other access roads at grades less than 5% may be Class II base. In addition, maintenance pads adjacent to the inlet structures shall be a minimum of 6- inch PCC (reinforced with #4 bar at 18" on center each way) designed for H-20 loading with a heavy broom finish. Additional paving requirements in excess of the above may be required when determined necessary at the discretion of the Director of Public Works- Operations (Engineering) 65. All grading and pad elevations shall be within 2 feet of the grades and elevations shown on the approved tentative map or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building. (Engineering) 66. Grant on the appropriate final "B" Map a 15-foot minimum drainage and access easement for public storm drain lines located between residential units unless otherwise directed by the 13-46 Pm'e 12 of33 City Engineer. All other public easements shall meet City standards for required width. (Engineering) 67. Development of the subdivision shall comply with all applicable regulations established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as set forth in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (N.P.D.E.S.) permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge and any regulations adopted by the City of Chula Vista pursuant to the N.P.D.E.S. regulations or requirements. Further, the Applicant shall file a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board to obtain coverage under the N.PD.E.S. General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity and shall implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) concurrent with the commencement of grading activities. The SWPPP shall include both construction and post construction pollution prevention and pollution control measures and shall identify funding mechanisms for post construction control measures. The Developer, and successors in interest, shall comply with all the provisions of the N.P.D.E.S. and the Clean Water Program during and after all phases of the development process, including but not limited to: mass grading, rough grading, construction of street and landscaping improvements, and construction of dwelling units. The Applicant shall comply with the City of Chula Vista Development and Redevelopment Projects Storm Water Management Standards Requirements Manual (Storm Water Management Standards Manual) and shall design the Proj ect' s storm drains and other drainage facilities to include Best Management Practices (BMP's) to minimize non-point source pollution, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (Engineering) 68. Submit to and obtain approval fiom the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building for an erosion and sedimentation control plan as part of grading plans. (Engineering, Planning) 69. Storm drain clean outs shall not be located on slopes or in inaccessible areas for maintenance equipment. Public storm drains shall be installed as close to perpendicular to the slope contours as possible but in no case greater than 15 degrees fiom perpendicular to the contours. (Engineering) 70. Brow ditches perpendicular to slopes greater than 10 feet in height and steeper than 3:1 gradient shall not be allowed. Drainage shall be collected in an inlet and carried via underground storm drain to the bottom of the slope or a drain inlet connected to an underground storm drain. The Applicant shall ensure that brow channels and ditches emanating fiom and/or running through City Open Space are not routed through private property. Brow ditches and channels from private property shall not be routed through City open space unless approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 71. Indicate on all affected grading plans that all walls, which are to be maintained by open space districts, shall be constructed entirely within open space lots dedicated to the City. (Engineering) 72. Locate lot lines at the top of slopes except as shown on the Tentative Map or as approved by the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building. Lots shall be so graded as to drain to the street or an approved drainage system.: Drainage shall not be permitted to flow over slopes or onto adjacent property. (Engineering, Planning) 13-47 Page 13 of33 73. Provide a mlmmum of three (3) feet of flat ground access fiom the face of any City maintained wall to the beginning of the slope rounding for wall maintenance, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 74. Provide a setback, as determined by the City Engineer and is based on Applicant's Soils Engineer recommendations, between the property lines of the proposed lots and the top or toe of any slope to be constructed where the proposed grading adjoins undeveloped property or property owned by others. The City Engineer will not approve the creation of any lot that does not meet the required setback. (Engineering) . 75. Construct temporary de-silting basins to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The exact design and location of such facilities shall be based on hydrological modeling and determined pursuant to direction by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 76. Developer shall submit a drainage study to the satisfaction of the City Engineer with each grading permit application showing that any interim conditions do not adversely impact downstream flows. (Engineering) 77. Prior to issuance of grading permits, Applicant shall demonstrate that the grading plans are in substantial compliance with the grading concepts outlined in the Village Seven SPA Plan consistent with the landform grading policies described in the City's General Plan. Said grading concepts will ensure that manufactured slopes are contoured to blend with and reflect adjacent slopes. (Engineering, Planning) 78. Prior to the approval of the fIrst Map for the Project, or issuance of the first grading permit for the Project, whichever occurs earlier, Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City ofChula Vista, wherein the Applicant agrees to the following: a. Comply with the requirements of the Storm Water Management Standards Manual including revision of approved grading and or improvement plans as necessary b. Indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees, fiom and against all fines, costs, and expenses and damages arising out of non- compliance with the requirements of the NPDES regulations, in connection with the execution of any construction and/or grading work for the Project, whether the non- compliance results fiom any action by the Applicant, any agent or employee, subcontractors, or others. The Applicant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorney's fees and liability incurred by the City. c. To not protest the formation of a facilities benefit district or any other funding mechanism approved by the City to fInance the operation, maintenance, inspection, and monitoring of NPDES facilities. This agreement to not protest shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to challenge the amount of any assessment, which may be imposed due to the addition of these improvements and shall not interfere with the right of any person to vote in a secret ballot election. Such Applicant obligation may be reassigned ~o a Master Homeowner's Association or other appropriate Maintenance District subject to the approval of the City Engineer. (Engineering) 13-48 Page]4of33 SEWER 79. Sewer access points shall, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Public Works: a. Be located at the centerline of streets or cul-de-sacs; and, b. Not be located on slopes or in inaccessible areas of maintenance equipment; and, c. Not be in the wheel tracks on Promenade Streets and higher street classifications; and, d. Meet Regional Standard Drawing M -4 (Locking) if located within intersections of Class I Collectors and above; and, e. Have improved all-weather paved 12-foot wide minimum access to withstand a H-20 vehicle load as approved by the Director of Public Works; and, f. Be provided at all changes of alignment of grade. (Engineering) 80. Prior to the first final "A" Map, the Applicant shall agree to participate and shall thereafter participate in any necessary funding for implementing a Poggi Canyon sewer trunk- monitoring program, as determined by the City Engineer. The sewer trunk-monitoring program shall include an analysis of the remaining capacity of the Poggi Canyon/Date-Faivre sewer system. The analysis shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that sufficient capacity exists for the number of ED Us contained in all Final Map for the Project submitted to the City pursuant to the limits set forth in the PFFP. The analysis shall include all flows, including pumped flows, entering the Poggi Canyon Trunk Sewer, not just fiom Village Seven, or from within the Poggi Canyon gravity basin. 81. The Village Seven sewer improvements shall be consistent with the Village Seven Conceptual Sewer Study, dated April 14, 2004 or a subsequent Sewer Study submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 82. Sewers serving 10 or less equivalent dwelling units shall have a minimum grade of 1 % and/or a velocity of 2' per second, or as approved by the City Engineer. Sewer lines shall be installed as close to perpendicular to the slope contours as possible but in no case greater than 15 degrees fiom perpendicular to the contours. (Engineering) 83. Grant on the appropriate final "B" Map a 20-foot minimum sewer and access easement for sewer lines located between residential units unless otherwise directed by the City Engineer. All other easements shall meet City standards for required width. (Engineering) 84. Prior to issuance of any building permit for equivalent dwelling units (EDU's) I through 105 in Project, the Poggi Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF in effect at the time of issuance shall be applied to each building permit. After issuance of the 105th EDU the Salt Creek Interceptor DIF in effect at the time of issuance shall be applied to each building permit, regardless of which sewer basin the unit is located. (Engineqing) 13-49 Page 15 of33 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE 85. The Village Seven Project shall satisfy the requirements of the Parkland Dedication Ordinance (PDO) pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 17. The ordinance establishes a requirement that the project provide three (3) acres of local parks and related improvements per 1,000 residents. Local parks are comprised of community parks and neighborhood parks. The Project's Neighborhood Park portion of the local park requirement shall be satisfied through the dedication of parkland and the payment of PAD fees that enable the provision of a 7.0 net useable-acre Neighborhood Park (P-1). The remaining requirement shall be satisfied in a future Community Park through the payment of fees, dedication of land, or a combination thereof in a manner acceptable to the Director of General Services. Common useable open space (CUOS) shall not receive park credit. (General Services) 86. Prior to approval of the first "A" Map for the Project, the Applicant shall comply with the provisions of the City of Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Master Plan as adopted and as it affects facility and other related requirements for the Project's parks. (General Services) 87. Prior to the approval of the first "A" Map for the Project, Applicant shall have prepared, submitted to and received approval fiom the Director of General Services of a comprehensive Landscape Master Plan (LMP) for the Project. Such approval shall be indicated by means of the Director of Planning and Building, or designee's signature and date on said Plan. The contents of the LMP shall conform to the City staff checklist and include the following major components: a. Maintenance Responsibility Plan (delineates private and public property and indicates the maintenance responsibility for each); b. Master Irrigation Plan (includes mainline and point of connection locations); c. Master Planting Plan (includes landscape concept statement); d. Brush Management Plan (identifies brush management zones and treatment, if any); e. Hardscape Concept and Trail Plan (identifies types and finishes of paving); f. Utility Coordination Plan (includes locations ofmajor utility boxes and vaults); g. Conceptual Wall and Fence Plan (includes the previously approved noise barrier plan); and h. Monumentation and Signage Plan (includes enlargements of entry monument locations and signage concepts) 88. Within 90 days of approval of the applicable final "Boo Map, enter into a maintenance agreement and grant easements as necessary for landscaping and improvements maintained by a Homeowners Association within City right-of-way or such other public areas required by the City. (Engineering, General Services) 13-50 Page 16 of33 89. Prior to the issuance of each grading permit for the Project, the Applicant shall prepare, submit, and secure to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning & Building all landscape and irrigation slope erosion control plans. All plans shall be prepared in accordance with the current Chula Vista Landscape Manual and Grading Ordinance, as may be amended fiom time to time. Applicant shall install landscape and irrigation slope erosion control in accordance with approved plans no later than six months fiom the date of issuance of the grading permit. If the work cannot be completed within the specified time, the Applicant may request an extension, which may be granted at the discretion of the Director of Planning & Building. Such a request shall be submitted for approval in writing to the Planning & Building Department sufficiently in advance of the end of the six-month timefiame to allow processing of the extension. Notwithstanding the time of installation of landscape, and irrigation slope erosion control, Applicant shall remain in compliance with NPDES. (Planning, General Services) 90. Prior to the approval of any final "B" Map for the Project, the Applicant shall obtain approval of a Wall and Fence Plan fiom the Director of Planning and Building. The Wall and Fence Plan shall be in conformance with the Village Seven SPA plan and shall identify location of walls, constructions materials and color, and wall and fence types. The plan shall also identify location and type of trial signage proposed throughout the development. Final wall design, location and construction details, including fencing and signage, shall be shown on the Wall and Fence Plans and shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning & Building. (Planning) 91. The conceptual Wall and Fence Plan for the Project shall be included in the Project's Landscape Master Plan and shall indicate color, materials, height and location. Materials and color used shall be compatible and all walls located in corner side-yards or rear yards facing public or private streets or pedestrian connections shall be constructed of a decorative masonry and/or wrought iron material. View fencing shall be provided at the ends of all other open cul-de-sacs where a sound wall is not required. All walls shall be constructed pursuant to Final EIR 04-06 and the Village Seven SPA Plan. Upon request of the Director of General Services, Applicant shall update the Project's Landscape Master Plan to conform to any substantial changes made subsequent to the initial approval of the Plan (Planning, General Services) 92. Prior to Applicant constructing a solid masonry, view wall or like wall which will adjoin a wall constructed by a different developer, a transition wall plan shall be submitted to the City and is subject to the approval of the Director of Planning and Building. Applicant shall work together with other developers of Village Seven to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building in order to construct transitions between adjoining walls. (Planning) 93. Prior to the issuance of each street construction permit for the Project, the Applicant shall prepare and secure, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Director of General Services, street improvement Landscape & Irrigation Plans. All plans shall be prepared in accordance with the current Chula Vista Landscape Manual and the Village Seven SPA Plan, as may be amended fiom time to time. Applicant shall install all improvements in accordance with approved plans to the satisfaction of the Director of General Services and the City Engineer. (General Services, Engineering) 13-51 Page 17 of 33 94. Prior to the approval of the first "A" Map, the Applicant may enter into an agreement with the City of Chula Vista to pay a portion of the Park Development Fees, which in the discretion of the Director of General Services, is sufficient to fund the design of the neighborhood park. The balance of the PAD Fee obligation shall be met in the manner stated in CVMC Section 17.10.100, collection and distribution of fees. In the absence of a written agreement provided for herein, the applicant shall pay all applicable PAD fees prior to the recordation of the fIrst Final Map, whether an "A" or "B" Map. (General Services) TRAILS 95. All trails shall be bonded/secured and constructed with the approved rough grading, and connect to adjoining existing and/or proposed trails in neighboring development projects, as determined by the Directors of Planning and Building and General Services. (Planning, General Services) 96. The Regional Trial shall be extended off-site easterly to connect with the Village Pathway on Magdalena to the satisfaction of the Director of General Services. When trails extend to the property limits and are intended to continue into an adjacent property, Developer(s) agree(s) to coordinate alignments, trail and fencing materials and construction methods so as to provide a seamless transition fiom one ownership to another. (General Services) 97. Prior to the approval of any Final Map with open space lots for the Project, Applicant shall provide an easement to the City, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for all trail alignments. (General Services) 98. The Applicant shall, concurrent with the construction of the Wolf Canyon channel and Detention Basins, construct a "Regional Trail" along the south side of the channel and basin fiom Magdalena Avenue to La Media Road as depicted on the Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan in the Village Seven SPA Plan, which shall be designed to incorporate the Project's Landscape Master Plan as approved by the City and as may be amended fiom time to time. The regional trail design shall be suitable for H-20 loading. (General Services, Engineering) 99. The Applicant shall, concurrent with the construction of La Media Road improvements, construct a "Regional Trail" along the east side of the street from Wolf Canyon to Santa Luna Street as depicted on the Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan in the Village Seven SPA Plan, and shall be designed to incorporate the Project's Landscape Master Plan as approved by the City and as may be amended fiom time to time. (General Services) 100. Applicant shall keep any necessary retaining walls to a minimum and/or if a grading· solution can be found, retaining walls will not be used to gain additional space for the street corridor unless approved as shown on the Tentative Map. The retaining walls are to be located and detailed on all applicable grading plans for the Project, and subject to the approval of the Directors of Planning and Building, Public Works and General Services. Slope gradients may be increased to the maximum permitted in the grading ordinance in limited locations to accommodate constraints such as maintenance access ways. Landform grading policies shall be observed and followed. If a combination of low retaining walls and modified landform grading cannot accommQdate any constraints or maintenance access areas, the top of slope shall be adjusted, as City deems necessary. (General Services) 13-52 Page 18 of33 101. Neighborhood connector trails located within the Proj ect shall provide a minimum 6- foot wide decomposed granite (DG) or cement treated base (CTB) trail bed, or as approved by the Director of General Services. Where down slopes (exceeding 4: 1) occur adjacent to the trial, an additional 4-foot graded shoulder shall be provided with split-rail fencing centered in the shoulder. Where up slopes occur adjacent to the trail a 2-foot shoulder (with a 2% maximum cross-slope) shall be provided. Shoulders shall be planted and irrigated in accordance with the most current edition of the Chula Vista Landscape Manuel, as amended fiom time to time. All trail construction materials shall be subject to the approval pf the Director of General Services. (General Services, Public Works) 102. Applicant shall obtain the approval of the Director of Planning and Building for appropriate signage indicating location of trail connections, handicap access, and bikeway locations to the Regional Trail, Village Pathway, and Chula Vista Greenbelt. Said signage shall be included on the Wall and Fence Plan. Signage shall be installed upon the request of the Director of Planning and Building. (Planning) 103. Applicant agrees to comply with the current Regulatory Negotiation Committee Recommendations for Accessibility Guidelines: Outdoor Developed Areas Final Report, as may be amended fiom time to time, developed for: U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board when designing all trails and trail connections. (General Services) OPEN SPACE/ASSESSMENTS 104. In the event Developer wishes to request the formation of a Maintenance District or similar funding mechanism, the Developer shall submit an application packet for formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD), and submit the request for CFD formation to the City Council for consideration. The CFD shall be formed prior to approval of the first "B" Map for the Project. Subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works, Developer shall submit a list of amenities, acreage and costs for all Open Space District lots including but not limited to the cost of any detention basin maintenance and structural storm water quality BMP's within the Project. Developer shall maintain the open space improvements for a minimum period of one year or until such time as accepted into the open space district by the Director of Public Works. If Council does not approve the CFD formation, another financing mechanism such as a Master Homeowners Association, or an endowment shall be established and submitted to the City Council for consideration prior to approval of the first Map Along with submission of the application package for formation ofthe CFD, Developer shall submit an initial cash deposit in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer to begin the process of formation of the Open Space District. All costs of formation and other costs associated with the processing of the open space relating to this Project shall be borne by the Developer. The Developer shall provide all the necessary information and materials (e.g., tables, diagrams, etc.) required by the City Engineer for processing the formation ofthe proposed open space district. (Public Works) 105. Prior to the approval of the first final "B" Map, the developer shall: a. Submit evidence, acceptable to the City: Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building of the formation of a Master Homeowner's Association (MHOA), or another 13-53 Page 19 of33 [mancial mechanism acceptable to the City Manager. The MHOA shall be responsible for the maintenance of those landscaping improvements that are not to be included in the proposed financial mechanism. The City Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building may require that some of those improvements shall be maintained by the Open Space District. The final determination of which improvements are to be included in the Open Space District and those to be maintained by the MHOA shall be made during the Open Space District Proceedings. The MHOA shall be structured to allow annexation of future tentative map areas in the event the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building require such annexation of future tentative map areas. The MHOA formation documents shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney; and, b. The developer shall submit for City's approval the CC&Rs, grant of easements and maintenance standards and responsibility of the MHOAs for the open space areas within the Project area. Developer shall acknowledge that the MHOAs maintenance of public open space, trails, parkways, and like areas may expose the City to liability. Developer agrees to establish a MHOA that will hold the City harmless fiom any actions of the MHOA in the maintenance of such areas; and, c. Submit and obtain approval of the City Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building of a list of all Otay Ranch Village Seven SPA and MHOA facilities and other items to be maintained by the proposed district. Separate lists shall be submitted for the improvements and facilities to be maintained by the Open Space District and those to be maintained by a Master Homeowner's Association. Include a description, quantity and cost per year for the perpetual maintenance of said improvements. These lists shall include but are not limited to the following facilities and improvements: 1. All facilities located on open space lots to include but not be limited to: walls, fences, water fountains, lighting structures, paths, trails, access roads, drainage structures and landscaping. Each open space lot shall also be broken down by the number of acres of: I) turf, 2) irrigated, and 3) non-irrigated open space to aid in the estimation of a maintenance budget thereof. II. The proportional share of medians and parkways along La Media Road, Magdalena Avenue and Birch Road (onsite and off site) and all other street parkways proposed for maintenance by the applicable Community Facilities District or Homeowners' Association. 111. The detention basin located in Wolf Canyon. IV. All storm-water quality structural BMP's serving the Project. (Engineering) 106. Developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication in fee interest to the City on all applicable Final Maps, those open space lots shown on the tentative map to be maintained by an open space district. (Engineering) 107. Prior to the approval of each Final "B" Map, Declaration or Supplementary Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be submitted and subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The CC&R's shall include the following obligations of the Master Homeowners Association: 13-54 Page 20 of 33 a. A requirement that the MHOA shall maintain comprehensive general liability insurance against liability incident to ownership or use of the following areas: 1. All open space lots that shall remain private, 11. Other Master Association property. b. Before any revisions to provisions of the CC&R's that may particularly affect the City can become effective, said revisions shall be approved by the City. The MHOA shall not seek approval fiorn the City of said revisions without the prior consent of 100 percent of the holders of first mortgages or property owners within the MHOA. c. The MHOA shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employee fiom any claims, demands, causes of action liability or loss related to or arising fiom the maintenance activities of the MHOA. d. The MHOA shall not seek to be released by the City fiom the maintenance obligations described herein without the prior consent of the City and 100 percent of the holders of first mortgages or property owners within the MHOA. e. The MHOA is required to procure and maintain a policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis in an amount not less than one million dollars combined single limit. The policy shall be acceptable to the City and name the City as additionally insured to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. f. The CC&R's shall incorporate restrictions for each lot adjoining open space lots containing walls maintained by the open space district to ensure that the property owners know that the walls may not be modified or supplemented nor may they encroach on City property. g. The CC&R's shall include provisions assuring maintenance of all streets, driveways, drainage and sewage systems which are private. h. The CC&R's shall include provisions assuring MHOA membership in an advance notice such as the USA Dig Alert Service in perpetuity. 1. The CC&R's shall include provisions that provide the City has the right but not the obligation to enforce the CC&R provisions the same as any owner in the Project. J. The CC&R provisions setting forth restrictions in these Tentative Map conditions may not be revised at any time without prior written permission of the City. k. The MHOA shall not dedicate or convey for public streets, land used for private streets without approval of 100% of all the BOA members or holder of first mortgages within the MHOA. 1. The CC&R's shall prohibit "speed bumps" on private streets. The CC&R's shall also include language which states that any proposal by the HOA to allow "speed bumps" in the future shall require prior written ¡¡pproval of 100% of all the Homeowners Association members. (Engineering, Planning) 13-55 Page2! of33 108. Future property owners shall be notified during escrow, by a document to be initialed by the owners, of the maintenance responsibilities of the MHOA and their estimated annual cost. Developer shall submit the document and obtain the approval of the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building prior to distribution through escrow, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. (Engineering, Planning) 109. The CPF lot shall be maintained by a maintenance entity as determined by the Director of Planning and Building based on City Council policy. The facilities in the CPF Lot shall be maintained by a maintenance entity include, but are not limited to: pavements, sidewalks, street lights including power supply, private drainage facilities and landscaping of private common areas. The CPF Lot, Common Usable Open Space area as described in the Chula Vista Design Manual, shall be landscaped, graded and contains amenities to the satisfaction of the Director Planning & Building. Construction shall be completed prior to the issuance of the final building permit. (Engineering, General Services) 110. Grade a level, clear area at least three feet wide (face of wall to top of slope), along the length of any wall abutting an open space district lot, as measured fiom face-of-wall to beginning of slope. Said area shall be as approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building. (Engineering, Planning) 111. Developer shall ensure that all buyers of individual lots adjoining open space lots, containing walls maintained by the open space district, sign a statement, when purchasing their homes, stipulating that they are aware that the walls are on City or HOA property and that they shall not modify or supplement the wall or encroach onto the property. These restrictions shall also be incorporated in the CC&R's for all lots. (Engineering) 112. Prior to approval of each Final Map, provide proof to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Director of General Services that all improvements located on open space lots are incorporated into and maintained by a Home Owner's Association or an Open Space District. (Engineering, General Services) 113. The developer agrees to not protest formation or inclusion in a maintenance district or zone for the maintenance of landscaped medians and scenic corridors along streets within or adjacent to the subject subdivision. (Engineering) 114. Street parkways within the Project shall be maintained by an entity such as a Master Home Owner's Association (MHOA) or a Community Facilities District (CFD); private homeowners shall not maintain the parkways. Street parkways shall be designated as recycled water use areas, if approved by the Otay Water District and San Diego County Health. (Engineering, General Services) 115. Prior to issuance of any grading permit which includes permanent Landscaping and Irrigation (L&I) improvements to be installed in an open space lot to be maintained by the Community Facility District (CFD), the developer shall place a cash deposit, or other funding mechanism acceptable to the City, in the City's sole discretion, with the City which will guarantee the maintenance of the L&I improvements until the City accepts said improvements. In the event the improvem~nts are not maintained to City standards as determined by the City Engineer and the Director General Services, the deposit shall be used 13-56 Page 22 of 33 to perform the maintenance. The amount of the deposit shall be equivalent to the estimated cost of maintaining the open space lots to City standards for a period of six months, ("Minimum Deposit Amount''), as determined by the City Engineer. Any unused portion of said deposit may be incorporated into the CFD's Reserve Account, or returned to the Developer, according to the following: a. If, six months prior to the scheduled date of acceptance of Landscape and Irrigation improvements for maintenance by the CFD, the Reserve Account is less than the Minimum Deposit Amount, the difference between these two amounts shall be incorporated into the Reserve Account, or; b. If the Reserve Account is at or above the Minimum Deposit Amount, the unused portion of the deposit may be returned to the Developer in 6 equal monthly increments over the last six months of the maintenance period if the maintenance is being accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of General Services. (Engineering, General Services) WATER 116. Prior to City acceptance of any open space lots, the Developer shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that the assessments/bonded indebtedness for all parcels dedicated or granted in fee to the City have been paid or that no assessments exist on the parcel(s). (Engineering) 117. Prior to approval of each Final Map, present verification to the City Engineer in the form of a letter fiom Otay Water District that the subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long-term water storage facilities. The Applicant shall phase and install water system improvements as required by the Otay Water District. (Engineering, Planning) 118. Prior to approval of each Final Map, the Applicant shall present verification to the City Engineer in the form of a letter from Otay Water District that Otay Water District is able to provide sufficient water supply pursuant to Section 66473.7 of the California Government Code, as may be amended fiom time to time. (Engineering) 1I9. Prior to approval of the first Final Map for the Project, the Developer(s) shall provide a Subarea Master Plan (SAMP) for Village Seven, as approved by Otay Water District (OWD), which will also include an analysis of recycled water for open space slopes. When said SAMP is approved, the Developer(s) shall provide the water and recycled water improvements in accordance with the SAMP, The SAMP shall be consistent with the SPA Plan. If the SAMP is inconsistent with the SPA Plan, the Developer(s) shall be responsible for obtaining the approval by OWD of any amendment to the Village Seven SAMP in order for the Village Seven SAMP to be consistent with the approved SPA Plan prior to the approval ofthe first Map for the Project. (Engineering) EASEMENTS 120. Grant to the City a 10' wide easement for general utility purposes along public street fiontage of all open space lots offered for dedication to the City unless otherwise approved 13-57 Page 23 of 33 by the City Engineer. Ensure that sufficient room is available for street tree planting when locating utilities within this easement. (Engineering) 121. Indicate on all appropriate "B" Maps a reservation of easements to the future Homeowners Association for private storm drain, if any, within open space lots as directed by the City Engineer. Obtain, prior to approval of each final "B" Map, all off-site right-of- way necessary for the installation of the required improvements for that subdivision thereto. The developer shall also provide easements for all on-site and off-site public drainage facilities, sewers, maintenance roads, and any other public facilities necessary to provide service to the subject subdivision. (Engineering) 122. Grant on the applicable Final Maps sight distance easements to the City of Chula Vista for comer lots, as required by the City Engineer to keep such areas clear of any obstructions. Sight distance easements shall be shown on applicable grading plans, improvement plans, and Final Maps, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (Engineering) 123. Design landscape and irrigation plans such that street tree placement is not in conflict with the visibility of any traffic signage. The Developer shall be responsible for the removal of any obstructions of said traffic signs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (Engineen'ng) 124. Grant easements to subsequent owners pursuant to Section 18.20.150 of the City Code on any Final Map that proposes private utilities or drainage facilities crossing property lines as directed by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 125. Grant to City on all appropriate final "B" Map, a 2-foot access easements along the rear and side property line oflots adjoining walls to be maintained by the open space district. The locations of these easements shall be as required by the Director of Planning and Building and the City Engineer to provide adequate access for maintenance of said walls. (Engineering) 126. Storm drain easements shall be private unless the storm drain systems therein are public. (Engineering) 127. Where a private storm drain easement will parallel a public sewer easement, the easements shall be delineated separately on the Final Map and on the grading and improvement plans. If any portion of the easements will overlap one another, the City shall have a superior right to the common portion of the easements. (Engineering) 128. Prior to the approval of each Final Map for the Project, the City Engineer may require either the removal or the subordination of any easement, which may uilleasonably interfere with the full and complete exercise of any required public easement or right-of-way. (Engineering) 129. The developer shall notify the City at least 60 days prior to consideration of the first Map for the Project by City if any off-site right-of-way cannot be obtained as required by the Conditions of Approval. (Only off-site right-of-way or easements affected by Section 66462.5 ofthe Subdivision Map Act are covered by this condition.) After said notification, the developer shall: 13-58 Pa,ge 24 of33 a. Pay the full cost of acquiring off-site right-of-way and/or easements required by the Conditions of Approval of the tentative map. b. Deposit with the City the estimated cost of acquiring said right-of-way and/or easements. Said estimate to be approved by the City Engineer. c. Have all easements and/or right-of-way documents and plats prepared and appraisals complete which are necessary to commence condenmation proceedings as determined by the City Attorney. d. Request that the City use its powers of Eminent Domain to acquire right-of-way, easements or licenses needed for off-site improvements or work related to the Final Map. The developers shall pay all costs, both direct and indirect incurred in said acquisition. e. Acquire and bond for offsite rights-of-way and easements to be dedicated to the City in order to comply with the PFFP schedule. Applicant shall bond for the off-site improvements as required by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 130. Grant on the Final Maps minimum 15' wide easements to the City of Chula Vista as required by the City Engineer for construction and maintenance of sewer facilities. (Engineering) 131. Provide minimum 15' wide easements to the City of Chula Vista as required by the City Engineer for construction and maintenance of storm drain facilities. (Engineering) 132. Provide easements for all off-site public storm drains and sewer facilities prior to approval of each Final Map for the Project requiring those facilities. The easements shall be sized as required by the City ofChula Vista Standards, unless otherwise approved'by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 133. Grant on all applicable Final Maps, easements along all public streets within the subdivision as shown on the tentative map and in accordance with City standards unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building. The City Engineer may require either the removal or the subordination of any easement, which may unreasonably interfere with the full and complete exercise of any required public easement or right-of-way. (Engineering) 134. Grant on the appropriate Final Map, a 20-foot minimum sewer and access easement for sewer lines located between residential units, unless otherwise required by the City Engineer. All other easements shall meet City standards for required width. (Engineering) 135. Additional easement widths shall be granted to the satisfacticJn of the City Engineer and the Director of General Services to accommodate a 10-foot Regional Trial on the eastside of La Media Road from Wolf Canyon to Santa Luna Street. AGREEMENTS/FINANCIAL 136. Enter into a supplemental agreement with,the City, prior to approval of each Final Map for the Project, where the developer agrees to the following: 13-59 Page 25 of 33 a. That the City may withhold building permits for the Project in order to have the Project comply with the Growth Management Program, as may be amended fiom time to time, or if anyone of the fol1owing occur: 1. Regional development threshold limits set by a Chula Vista transportation-phasing plan, as amended fiom time to time, have been reached. 11. Traffic volumes, levels of service, public utilities and/or services either exceed the adopted City threshold standards or fail to comply with the then effective Growth Management Ordinance, and Growth Management Program and any amendments thereto. Public utilities shal1 include, but not be limited to, air quality, drainage, sewer and water. iii. The required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or as amended or otherwise conditioned have not been completed or constructed to the satisfaction of the City. The developer may propose changes in the timing and sequencing of development and the construction of improvements affected. In such case, the PFFP may be amended as approved by the City's Director of Planning and Building and the City Engineer. The Applicant agrees that the City may withhold building permits for any of the phases of development identified in the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) for Otay Ranch Village Seven SPA ifthe required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or as amended by the Annual Monitoring Program have not been completed. 13-60 Page 26 of33 b. To defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees, fiom any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Councilor any approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision pursuant to Section 66499.37 of the State Map Act provided the City promptly notifies the Applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the defense. c. Permit all cable television companies franchised by the City of Chula Vista equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television service for each lot or unit within the Tentative Map area. Developer further agrees to grant, by license or easement, and for the benefit of, and to be enforceable by, the City of Chula Vista, conditional access to cable television conduit within the properties situated within the Final Map only to those cable television companies fianchised by the City of Chula Vista, the condition of such grant being that: 1. Such access is coordinated with Developer's construction schedule so that it does not delay or impede Developer's construction schedule and does not require the trenches to be reopened to accommodate the placement of such conduits; and 11. Any such cable company is and remains in compliance with, and promises to remain in compliance with the terms and conditions of the fianchise and with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been, or may fiom time to time be, issued by the City of Chula Vista. Developer hereby conveys to the City of Chula Vista the authority to enforce said covenant by such remedies as the City determines appropriate, including revocation of said grant upon determination by the City of Chula Vista that they have violated the conditions of grant. d. That the City may withhold the issuance of building permits for the Project, should the Developer be determined by the City to be in breach of any of the terms of the Tentative Map Conditions or any Supplemental Agreement. The City shall provide the Developer of notice of such determination and allow the Developer reasonable time to cure said breach e. To defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees, from any liability for erosion, siltation or increase flow of drainage resulting fiom this Project. (Engineering. Planning) 137. The Applicant shall enter into an supplemental agreement with the City prior to approval of the first final "B" Map, where the developer agrees to the following: a. Participate, on a fair share basis, in any deficiency plan or financial program adopted by SANDAG to comply with the Congestion Management Program (CMP). b. To not protest the formation of any future regional impact fee program or facilities benefit district to finance the construction Qfregional facilities. (Engineering) 13-61 Page 27 of33 138. Prior to approval of each Final Map for the Project, the Applicant shall comply with all previous agreements as they pertain to this tentative map. (Engineering, Planning) 139. Prior to approval of each Final Map for the Project, the Applicant shall contract with the City's current street sweeping fianchisee, or other server approved by the Director of Public Works to provide street sweeping for each phase of development on a fiequency and level of service comparable to that provided for similar areas of the City. The developer shall cause street sweeping to commence immediately after the fmal residence, in each phase, is occupied and shall continue sweeping until such time that the City has accepted the street or 60 days after the completion of all punch list items, whichever is shorter. The developer further agrees to provide the City Special Operations Manager with a copy of the memo requesting street sweeping service, which memo shall include a map of areas to be swept and the date the sweeping will begin. (Public Works) 140. The Applicant shall be required to equitably participate in any future regional impact fee program for regional facilities should the region enact such a fee program to assist in the construction of such facilities. The Applicant shall enter into an agreement, prior to approval of the first Map, with the City which states that the Applicant will not protest the formation of any potential future regional benefit assessment district formed to finance regional facilities. (Engineering) 141. Prior to approval of the applicable Final Map for the Project, Applicant shall construct and secure, or agree to construct and secure, the construction of transit stop facilities as set forth in the PFFP. The schedule for constructing the transit stops shall be approved or determined by the City Engineer prior to approval of the aforementioned Final Map. Applicant shall design, subject to the approval of the City Engineer said transit stops in conjunction with the improvement plans for the related street. The City Engineer may require that Applicant provide security guaranteeing the construction of said transit stops in a form of cash or any other form approved by the City Engineer at hisfher sole discretion. Since transit service availability may not coincide with project development, the Applicant shall install said improvements when directed by the City. (Public Works/Transit) 142. No final "B" Maps may be recorded within Village Seven SPA area until such time that an annexable Mello Roos District, or some other financing mechanism approved by the school district, to provide for the construction of needed elementary, middle and high schools is established. (Engineering) 143. Prior to approval of the first final "A" Map for the Project in order to satisfy their fair- share contribution for financing the transit system, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City which states that the Applicant will not protest the formation of any potential future regional benefit assessment district formed to finance the transit system. (Engineering) 144. Prior to the approval of any Final Map for the Project that contains open space, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement to construct and secure open space landscape improvements within the map area. All landscape improvements shall be secured in amounts as determined by the Director of General Services and approved in form by the City Attorney. (Engineering, General Services) 13-62 Page 28 of33 145. The Developer shall enter into an agre;ement with the City of Chula Vista, prior to approval of Developers' first Final Map, regarding the provision of affordable housing. Such agreements shan be in accordance with the Chula Vista Housing Element, the Ranch Wide Affordable Housing Plan and the Village Seven Affordable Housing Plan. (Engineering) MISCELLANEOUS 146. The Developer shall implement the [mal AQIP measures as approved by the City Council, and as may be amended fiom time to time, and to comply and remain in compliance with the Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP). (Planning) 147. The Developer acknowledges that the City Council may, from time-to-time, modify air quality improvement and energy conservation measures as technologies and/or programs change or become available. The Developer shall modify the AQIP to incorporate those new measures upon request of the City, which are in effect at the time, prior to or concurrent with each Map approval within the Project. The new measures shall apply to development within all future map areas, but shall not be retroactive to those areas, which receive Final Map approval prior to effect of the subject new measures. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the City has adopted the City of Chula Vista Air Quality Improvement Plan Guidelines (AQIP Guidelines) as approved per Resolution No. 2003-260 and that such guidelines as approved and as may be amended fiom time-to-time shall be implemented. (Planning) 148. The Developer shall implement the final WCP measures as approved by the City Council, and as may be amended fiom time to time, and to comply and remain in compliance with the Water Conservation Plan (WCP). (Planning) 149. The Developer acknowledges that the City Council may, fiom time-to-time, modify water conservation measures as technologies and/or programs change or become available. The Developer shall modify the WCP to incorporate those new measures upon request of the City, which are in effect at the time, prior to or concurrent with each Map approval within the Project. The new measures shall apply to development within all future map areas, but shall not be retroactive to those areas, which receive Final Map approval prior to effect of the subject new measures. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the City has adopted the City ofChula Vista Water Conservation Plan Guidelines (WCP Guidelines) as approved per Resolution No. 2003-234 and that such guidelines as approved and as may be amended fiom time-to-time shall be implemented. (Planning) 150. The Applicant shall install all public facilities in accordance with the Village Seven Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), or as required to meet the Growth Management Threshold standards adopted by the City. The City Engineer may modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. The Applicant further agrees to comply with Chapter 19.09 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Growth Management Ordinance) as may be amended fiom time to time by the City. Said Chapter includes but is not limited to Threshold Standards (19.09.040) Public Facilities Plan Implementation (19.09.090) and Threshold Compliance Procedures (19.09.100). (Engineering) 13-63 Page 29 of33 151. The Applicant agrees that the maintenance and demolition of all interim facilities (public facilities, utilities and improvements) is the Applicant's responsibility, and that construction, maintenance and demolition bonds will be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (Engineering) 152. Within thirty (30) days of the City Council approval of these Map conditions, or prior to the submittal of the first Map for the Project, whichever occurs earlier, the Developer shall submit a digital drawing file of the tentative map in its approved form. The drawing projection shall be in California State Plane Coordinate System (NAD 83, Zone 6). The digital file shall combine all Map sheets into asingle CADD drawing, in DXF, DWG or Arc View (GIS) format and shall contain the following individual layers: a. Tentative Map Limits (closed polygons) b. Lot Lines (closed polygons) c. Street Centerlines (polylines) d. Easements (polylines) e. Street Names (annotation) f. Lot Numbers (annotation) The digital drawing file shall be submitted in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal on 3Yz" disks or CD, as an e-mail attachment to the City Engineer or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 153. Submit copies of all subsequent Tentative Maps, Final Maps, grading and improvement plans in a digital format. The drawing projection shall be in California State Plane Coordinate System (NAD 83, Zone 6). The digital file of the maps shall combine all map sheets into a sin$le CADD drawing, in DXF, DWG or Arc View (GIS) format and shall contain the following individual layers: a. Tentative and/or Final Map Boundaries (closed polygons) b. Lot Lines (closed polygons) c. Street Centerlines (poly lines) d. Easements (polylines) e. Street Names (annotation) f. Lot Numbers (annotation) g. Open Space maintenance areas with maintenance codes (polygons, annotation) h. Public and private structural BMP's (annotation) The Tentative Map, Final Map, grading plan and improvement plan digital files shall also conform to the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual requirements therefore. The digital drawing files shall be submitted in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal on 3 W' disks or CD, as an e-mail attachment to the City Engineer or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 154. On each Final Map, the boundary of the subdivision shall be tied to the California State Plane Coordinate System (NAD 83, Zone 6). (Engineering) 155. Pursuant to the provisions of the Growth Management Ordinance (Section 19.09 of the CVMC) and the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), and as they may be amended 13-64 Page 30 of 33 fiom time to time, the Applicant shall complete the following: (I) Fund a fair share of the preparation of an annual report monitoring the development of the community of Otay Ranch. The annual monitoring report will analyze the supply of, and demand for, public facilities and services governed by the threshold standards. An annual review shall commence following the first fiscal year in which residential occupancy occurs and is to be completed during the second quarter of the following fiscal year. The annual report shall adhere to those guidelines noted on page 353, Section D of the GDP/SRP; and (2) Prepare a five year development phasing forecast identifying targeted submittal dates for future discretionary applications (SPAs and tentative maps), projected construction dates, corresponding public facility needs per the adopted threshold standards, and identifying financing options for necessary facilities. (Engineering) 156. The owners of each Village shall be responsible for retaining a project manager to coordinate the processing of discretionary permit applications originating fiom the private sector and submitted to the City of Chula Vista. The project manager shall establish a formal submittal package required of each developer to ensure a high standard of design and to ensure consistency with standards and policies identified in the adopted SPA Plan. The project manager shall have a well-rounded educational background and experience, including but not limited to land use planning and architecture. (Planning) 157. If Developer desires to do certain work on the property after approval of the tentative map but prior to recordation of the applicable final "B" Map, they may do so by obtaining the required approvals and permits rrom the City. The permits can be approved or dénied by the City in accordance with the City's Municipal Code, regulations and policies. Said permits do not constitute a guarantee that subsequent submittals (i.e., final "B" Map and improvement plans) will be approved. All work performed by the Developer prior to approval of the applicable "B" Map shall be at the developers own risk. Prior to permit issuance, the Developer shall acknowledge in writing that subsequent submittals (i.e., final "B" Map and improvement plans) may require extensive changes, at developers cost, to work done under such early permit. Prior to the issuance of a permit, the developer shall post a bond or other security acceptable to the City in an amount determined by the City to guarantee the rehabilitation of the land if the applicable final "B" Map does not record. (Engineering) PHASING 158. Phasing approved with the SPA Plan may be amended subject to approval by the Director of Planning and Building and the City Engineer. The PFFP shall be revised where necessary to reflect the revised phasing plan. (Planning and Building, Engineering) 159. If phasing is proposed within an individual map or through multiple Final Maps, the developer shall submit and obtain approval for a development phasing plan by the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building prior to approval of any Final Map. Improvements, facilities and dedications to be provided with each phase or unit of development shall be as determined by the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building. The City reserves the right to require said improvements, facilities and/or dedications as necessary to provide adequate circulation and to meet the requirements of police and fire departments. The City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions' 13-65 Page 3 I of33 change to warrant such a revision. The developer agrees that the City Engineer may change the timing of construction of the public facilities. (Engineering) 160. The Public Facility Finance Plan or revisions thereto shall be adhered to for the SPA and tentative maps with improvements installed by Applicant in accordance with said plan or as required to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The PFFP identifies a facility phasing plan based upon a set of assumptions concerning the location and rate of development within and outside of the Project area. Throughout the build-out of Village Seven SPA, actual development may differ fiom the assumptions contained in the PFFP. Neither the PFFP nor any other Village Seven SPA Plan document grant the Applicant an entitlement to develop as assumed in the PFFP, or limit the Village Seven SPAs facility improvement requirements to those identified in the PFFP. Compliance with the City of Chula Vista threshold standards, based on actual development patterns and updated forecasts in reliance on changing entitlements and market conditions, shall govern Village Seven SPA development patterns and the facility improvement requirements to serve such development. In addition, the sequence in which improvements are constructed shall correspond to any transportation phasing plan or amendment to the Growth Management Program and Ordinance adopted by the City. The City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building may, at their discretion, modify the sequence, schedule, alignment and design of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. (Engineering) 161. Unless access, drainage and utilities are shown on the master Tentative Map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building, prior to approval of any Final Map proposing the creation of multi-family housing for the Project, including any condominium project, community apartment project, or stock cooperative, as defined in the applicable sections of the Goverrunent Code, Developer shall agree to process, and thereafter process, a subsequent tentative map for said proposed condominium, community apartment, or stock cooperative project within the Project pursuant to Section 66426 of the Subdivision Map Act, unless waived in writing by the Director of Planning and Building and the City Engineer. (Engineering, Planning) CODE REQUIREMENTS 162. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual. Underground all utilities within the subdivision in accordance with Municipal Code requirements, (Engineering) 163. Pay the following fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy: a. The Transportation and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. b. Signal Participation Fees. c. All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection fees. d. Interim SR-125 impact fee. e. Poggi Canyon or Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF as applicable. 13-66 Page 32 of 33 Pay the amount of said fees III effect at the time of issuance of building permits. (Engineering) 164. Comply with all relevant Federal, State, and Local regulations, including the Clean Water Act. The developer shall be responsible for providing all required testing and documentation to demonstrate said compliance as required by the City Engineer. (Engineering) 165. Ensure that prospective purchasers sign a "Notice of Special Taxes and Assessments" pursuant to Municipal Code Section 5.46.020 regarding projected taxes and assessments. Submit the disclosure form for approval by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval. (Engineering) 166. The Applicant shall comply with Chapter 19.09 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Growth Management) as may be amended fiom time to time by the City. Said chapter includes but is not limited to: threshold standards (19.09.04), public facilities finance plan implementation (19.09.090), and public facilities finance plan amendment procedures (19.09.100). (Engineering) REVISED TENTATIVE MAP CONDITIONS 167. Contribute fair share of the cost needed to complete the regional trail crosslllg at Magdalena Avenue. 168. The sidewalk shown in Detail "A" (Modified Cul-De-Sac) on Sheet I shall be 7-ft. wide around the curve and shown on the improvement plans. 169. The trails identified in Details "G" and "}" on Sheet 2 shall be identified as "Regional Trail" on the rough grading plans. 170. Provide a plan view layout of the 1 O-ft. D. G. Regional Trail on the east side of La Media Road to show its relationship to the 5-ft. sidewalk on Sheet 3. This layout shall be shown on the rough grading plans for the project. 171. The wall in Detail "D" on Sheet 4 to be located along Magdalena Avenue is to be CFD maintained, and the entire wall, including cap and footing, shall be located within the Magdalena Avenue right-of-way on the rough grading plans. J:\PLANNING\HAROLD\RESOLUTIONS\PCS-05-09REVISEOTM-ExHIBITB.ooc 13-67 Page 33 of33 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 14 04/05/05 ITEM IITLE: PUBLIC HEARING TO REVIEW THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM; THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM; AND THE EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT PROGRAM (ESG); AND TO RECCOMEND THE SPENDING PLAN FOR THE 2005-2006 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN. SUBMlnED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORIV..ç... ;tt'\ REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER 4/51HS VOTE: YES D NO 0 BACKGROUND Annual Action Plan The Cify of Chula Vista will receive its annual entitlement grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs to support activities, which benefit lower income households. To receive the annual entitlement grants, the Cify must develop and submit an Annual Action Plan. The Action Plan is a one-year comprehensive planning document, which serves as a single application for the three major grants (CDBG, HOME, and ESG). The Plan identifies the Cify's goals and objectives and eligible project/programs to address them. The projects/programs are selected through a competitive process, which consists of application submittals and presentations by the applicants to the Cify's Ad-Hoc Committee and Cify Council. Based on the information provided in their application and their testimony, staff prepares funding level recommendations for each of the eligible projects/programs. The Cify Council makes final funding recommendations, which is the purpose of this hearing item. The Council approved projects/programs are then incorporated into the Action Plan. The Plan is made available to the public for a 3D-day review period. During this time, the public is encouraged to submit comments on the proposed use of funds. At the conclusion of the 3D-day review period, public comments are incorporated into the Plan for Council considerotion. Upon final approval by the Council, the Plan is then submitted to HUD. 2005- 2006 Activi1v Selection Process Applications for funding were submitted to the Cify in January of this year. The Cify received 48 applications from local organizations and Cify departments. An application review period was 14-1 PAGE 2, ITEM NO.: 1'-1 MEETING DATE: 04/05/05 conducted from February 8 - March 8, 2005. During this time, staff reviewed each application to determine compliance and eligibility. The Public Service applicants were invited to present their formal requests to the City's Ad-Hoc Committee on March 21 -22 and to the City Council on March 29, 2005. Staff has prepared funding level recommendations for each of the projects/programs. The recommendations are provided with this staff report as Attachment No.1. The 30-day review period will be from April 6 - May 6,2005. RECOMMENDATION 1. That the City Council provide the funding recommendations for administration, capital improvements, community projects, economic development, public services, and affordable housing. 2. Direct staff to include the list of selected activities and funding amounts for the CDBG, HOME and ESG Program in the 2005-2006 Consolidated Annual Plan. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION The CDBG Ad-Hoc Committee has reviewed the funding applications and considered their testimony. Their funding recommendations are included in this report (Attachment No.1). DISCUSSION FundinQ AnalySis The funding recommendations for each of the activities shown below are based on HUD's mandated goals and objectives and the City Council's Five Strategic Themes, as identified in the adopted City Budget. These themes were created to establish priorities and guidance for the development of future programs and initiatives. 1. Connected, Balanced, and Cohesive Community: Foster a positive and shared community identity; encourage and value public participation; improve citywide mobility; and promote a balanced mix of housing, shoppiog, and employment opportunities. 2. Strong and Safe Neighborhoods: Ensure our neighborhoods and business districts are safe and appealing places to live, work, shop and visit. 14-2 PAGE 3, ITEM NO.: --11- MEETING DATE: 04/05/05 3. Diverse Cultural, Educational, and Recreational Opportunities: cultural, educational, recreational, and economic opportunities interests of our diverse community. Provide a wide-range of that meet the needs and 4. Economic Development: Foster a positive business climate that attracts new businesses, creates a broad range of employment opportunities, and revitalizes in the downtown area. 5. Cost Effective Government and Fiscal Stability: Focus on achieving results for our citizens by providing exemplary services at competitive prices; balance short-term operational needs with long-term strategic goals, and enhance long-range financial planning to ensure fiscal sustainability. FISCAL IMPACT The City will receive a total of $3,413,608 in federal grant funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Following is a breakdown of the individual grant programs, which identify entitlement amount and funding restrictions (if applicable): Communilv Development Block Grant (CDBG) The City's entitlement for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 is $2,261,525 with an additional $38,000 from Program Income for a total of $2,299,525. There is a fifteen percent (15%) spending cap on public services, which limits the allocation under this category to $344,928. In addition, there is a !wenty percent (20%) cap on administration and planning limiting the allocation in this category to $459,905. Home Investment Partnership Act Funds (HOME) The City's entitlement for HOME funds is $992,114. There is a ten percent (10%) spending cap on administration and planning. In addition, the City must allocate a minimum of fifteen percent (15%) towards a certified Community Housing Development Organization for the production of affordable housing. In addition, the City will receive $34,958 in American Dream Downpayment Initiative funds. Emeraencv Shelter Grant rESG) The City will receive $87,011 in ESG funds. There is a five percent (5%) spending cop on the administration and planning costs associated with the program. 14-3 l'J '" o U ( ) £ '" Qj > ~ 0> <: 'õ <: .2 <; ( ) >- (; 0. ( ) £ "Ò 2 ~ ( ) " er ~ 'Ô <: .2 'õ ë " o E o ( ) £ Q) "0 " U .!; "'0 ~ ~ .º ':;: ã 0"0 ~ <: o.( ) § E :¡::: E o 0 E u o ~ ë 0> .- <: ~:a >- <: .2 'i o:g Qj -, .0"0 "0 <: ~ 0 1: § Q):;::: "0 0 ,- "0 ( ) <: ~o ( ) ~ E "0 E <: 0 .2 u O>~ §a> ~ <: ~:a er<: ~.2 ~ ( ) E2 0== ~ E 8'E ~ 0 o.u ( ) J:: U - 0 õ=r _"0 « <: ( ) > .- '5> â ä~ ~.Q £=g o 'ë æ 0 ~ ,0 g'E :a ~ <: 0> " 0 ;0. ~J:: o U !!'.o ( ) ~ -º,e E o '" Qj > ~ ~ 0> o <: ( ) .- ~"O U <: ( ) " "0- ","0 .... ( ) ~~ ....0. 0. o .... o _~ È <; Q ~ 0>_ e ô 0.- l'J-g '" ~ 0" u- ( ),E J:: ~ ::: è O,Q £:§ u"o o 0 g-.f u O>.:!! <: <: ,- ( ) "0"0 <: ,- " ~ - ( ) "0 ~ ( ) 0 u1;; " .- "0> ( ),2 ~ " ( )J:: £u "o.?::- Q) '¡:: ~ 0 .g¡ ,~ 'ê 0. o 0> ê u <: 0 -'~ B :gID"Q -, ~ <: ...;...; Q) <: <: E 22 E 000 u.!::! u o <: ( ) = 0 .... o 0> ( ) mo.;),! <: 0 ,- "0 E -g ~ 0 "0- -;.0-5 c ~.- .- 0 oS: i§u~ E Q E .f~.g 0 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 on ci ci ~ 0 ~ ~ 0- ... ...: ~ 0: .., ..,. ~ tA-tA-tA-tA- .". "0 "0 "0 "0 ... ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) " "0 "0 "0 "0 ... .;; ';; ';; .;; ): e e 0 e 2 0- 0- ò:: 0- ... . ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) " <: <: <: <: r: 0 0 0 0 0 z z z z z 8 8 8 8 ó ª ª ci -0 .. 00. CD 0: Ó o' ~ '" - .. ~ ........ ........ .". 8 8 8 0 8 0 ª ,.: ~ ~ ,.: '" ~ 0 on ..¡ ~ ¡::¡ -0 ..,. .., tA-tA-tA-tA- .". M ã Õ .... E ~ 0 Q) E æ Qj e 0 E ~ 0 0> 0- J: <: Q g> c .º a.. ';;;; 0 g <: " ( ) 0 0 U .!O ~ J: (; <: ~ ~ 'f ~ 'õ "" ( ) ~ "0 ~ .g i3 < ( ) >- - ò:: 0 ] u '> <: V') ';:: 0 0 >- 0 "5 '¡¡' ;:"'t:i J:: ( ) UÏ u '" 0 0> :> ( ) ( ) 0 0 0> <: E <: 0 E '(' v> <: 'õ 0 0 u ¡¡: 'u ( ) ~ ~ <: ~ " 0 '> '> 0 ~ 0 0 u "" 0> ~ "5 "5 0 J:: J:: <: >- U U .¡;; 0 " 'õ 'õ 0 <: J: 0 ç ç ~ '¡¡' ü ü 'õ ( ) ~ '" ......NM"Ct 14-4 .. , . . · 8 '0 I o o 05 8 I ) g o .,¡ '" · · · . · ~trT-b"tio'Tb'T~ · , o o O· '" '" ~ 888 <ri8' 0 '" 0 ""'0 , cò ri -('oj . · · . · · ~~~iA-¡A.t04- 8 - . ' § , 05 8 I 'M ... o .¿ · - - ~~iA-iA-b'T-b"T 888888 ·§·§·N"':O~ , '<t"<tt--. o-.o-."<tC") · Ò 0:5..¿ 'ò ri ..... ..... "<t '" · iA-iA-iA-iA-¡A.iA- ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ g 5 c: (;j * c: ~ ~ ~ Ë <D 0 :!::: Q) o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~E§o.g5Ji ·uocE u ~ Qq :¡ 5 E>-5~:J'" :o~§~§~ .ct])gu~~ °Šc~p~ c: Q ~ °ecc;:c c:g~~g~ Õ 0 0;r. 0 ~ i!! i!! ~ i!! VI ~ U U U (¡) :> .!B ~ ~ ". .., T ~ T ~ggg~g i!!»>;> -gg¡;pg :~555S5 .oÕÕÕÕõ .:>~>->-~~ · ]JJ] J · · · o I,{)-or--..coo-...... o o ~. o o I g I o .¿ 8888888888888888 §'g g08' gg§'~g§' §'08's¡ggg 00 00 "<t'O "<t1,()1,()1,() ~i.Ò,,¿-òàCO)i.Ò,,¿-òo:còÑ""¡"¿('"')Ñ C'.I C"') N..... ..... - - 888888 oggggg 81J")oaoo dMi.ÒÒO:0:5 '" -- iA-b'TiA-iA-iA-iA-iA-iA-iA-iA-iA-iA-b'TiA-iA-iA-iA-iA-iA-iA-~iA-iA-iA-iA-iA-iA- 88 cid' 00 '" ..¿...¡ 88888 08'8'00 ('oj 0'" C'\IU')Q"'o:t"<t MlÒ<'ÌCÒ"¿ ('oj- 8 8888888888888888 '~' gg g~g~~~ó~~g~g~>i I,{) "<t~I,()~"'o-.o-.("")I,()I,()NC"')1J') "<to i.Ò cò""¡ , ·-.iÑ....¡..¿..¿-òò..¿c.rio:S...¡,¿ ..... ..........(")..... N.......... ..... ~ g>~~~~~, 8, ð . 'g~§§§§ g ~ ~MCÒr--:o:<Ò ~ ~ - ('oj '" .c: Õ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~I~I~I~I~ 888888888888888888888888888 ~s¡~g§'gooo§'~§'§'gg~~~~~~~~~§'s¡g I,() 0-. 0-.1,() 0888 Õ 00 -oco ....,.r-..MCO "<to r--:o:r--::c<5N"i.Òòi.Òò-ò8'cri..¿ i.Òui-..iòr--::o:ò -Ñò'¿ÒI.ÒÒ "<t NM I,() ~NNNI,{)N "<t N N - iA-iA-ir'TiA-iA-tA-tA-tA-iA-tA-iA-tA- - 8888 §"o r--.:", ... "'''' 0- co co ÒMÑ""': C'lNNN - ~~ ~~I~I~I~I~I~I~ N-oIJ')C")("').....OOLC')I,()OO co.o:ro.. r--..r--..MI,{)I,{)NN I.() I.() ..q:1.(j 'NN "crioo-:ó..oa L.t')NI,{) CQI.ÓN" o-N o..co-co..o..r--... COQ"<t"<tCQ ÑLÒlÒr--::r--::ÑCÒÑ"'¡"¿riÑ ... '" 8 8 g cD ... ~ ~ì '" ~ If> 8 § <'i 8 cD '" .. ., ... '" - ~ '" 8 o ... .. o " '" o co 0: '" ... ò - ~ '" o o § .¿ o o ..; o ... .... '" ... - ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~I~I~I~ ~ ~I~ ~~I~ ~ If> iD .~ ~; " '" 5 § ~ ,~ '- õ 5~ '0 "S c: U E ~]c: 1i ~o.º 0 ~~o D º:J~ a, ~ s:::: (¡¡ ;;¡ ,~ '" 0 .'!1" 2 ~ O~JQ) ~ on;::c >- 5~~¡:¡ :;; :d'offi g!C: - c....cã 0 IDQ.I')( ).Q ~(»¡¡E"'š $1 Uo. ~= Q.) ~""E""""" t U:J c...o ~~.~§~êª~~g~~ ¡J8 .?;gJõõ§tQ>";:'iE¡;p ,g¡C: '§ e~~ª~~~3~g§~ ~~ E g;;E~~~g>~,=t¡o.E~~Æ~ E (»~U;< "'~>-~ E", 8~5~E;z:~¡e~~ß ~.Eë Q) CD Q) Q) Q) CD »»» BB:g:g~:g o 0 0 000 ~..::,¿..::,¿..::,¿.:::.t.~.Q.Q..a.Q.a.a oooooo~~£~~~ }:}:}:}:}:}:oooooo "''''''''''''' "'uuuuuu 2ZZZ2Z000000 "" "" "" "" "" "" .- .- .- .- .- .- m Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) C C C C C C U U U U U U Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) .- .- .- .- .- .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iJ iJ iJ iJ iJ iJ V)V)V)V)V)V')a::)cccccccccc .r:..cJ:.c..c..c.c.c.cJ::££ :5"S"S"S"S"S:;-S-S-S-S-S o 0 000 0 0 0 000 0 >->->->->->-V>V')V')V')V)V) g! ., g! " Ë 0 ~ ~ 0=« c: E g> ª~ ú.2 E Ê .Q SI" 5";;' ~Q=o õcö ~ CID~~ ID~ID>oQ.æ c 'Oo:¡¡ c: ou,,~ UêUo'i'!1o 0 g23 ~~~~~~E~,.H~~3~: 2~~ ~U~ ~o",,,,c:,,c:õ~"§'u~~~, >-U"'''' ..c~ë c~~~:J~o:'''~; f:':' >-õëOC:¿ u~~j Q; T::> 0 ~ C: C: " c E v c ~ c .~::> a¿ < 0 T C: 3:oE ):)C:IDQ)u:J8~'==> :J~EOJ": g2w§ '" ; E :::.a¿ ~ ~ ¡;; E 2~ ~ E ~ E ') E ; c: ~ ¡¡¡ ¡: " ~ Ë C:>q "':::ºº-,!E ",¡;E..,E~q>~;"'.>!>ºŠ>-E 6~g§~§~~~3~~~Bf33gg~~~~~~~< ~J~5o~c:c:8£g~~£~~g~S~5§~5§~§ "'Õgg~~~~,=§~~Ǫ€~~~gõ~~§~õ~~5 ¡¡;>-:>::>iDE!:!:>-::>'" ::> ::>>-;:>>-0' ~;>-<::J¡; 6550oo33~,~'~ ,~o~1~~~~~J5~~ 14-5 N~M~~~~ro~a~NM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ( ) > -= E o .0 .Q (5 U o 'c '" '" >- o '" .c: "S o '" (¡¡ ë '" u '" " u £ o '" :r: >- o o "5 '0 .( >- o '" .c: "S o '" w '" u ~ .. '" .!! :¡; ::0 .. '6 Õ .... '" ('oj ..,...,.tI> 1J1J"C Q) Q) .. "'0-0" "g .~ ~ è:d:a.. Q) Q) .. C C " o 0 0 zzz ..,...,. tI> ~ o D1 2 o U ~ Q 888 ddd 00", "''''00 ~CÒfÒ <"><>-... '" ..,...,.tI> "- (] .E ë ë Q) "2 Q) E :> E ii o Q) 15 < g :; .£0; .E"" Qj~ ë 'ü Q) 0 uu. ç-5 "- 0 § -e E Q) E 1J o :> u3 ü~ .9l. t5 e 1J "- C U 0 -< ,,;. -< 0 :::;'" gM~ 88 g ..; o ~ 0:.. <"> ~ ~ ü~ .~ Õ è: ã z ~ ~ o - o .... ~ 5 o '5 .£ U Õ .D :> Ü 14-6 88 NO 00 <>-0 O::ò ....'" 00000 00000 gggg¡:j aaaoo-~ ÑI.ÒÒI.Ò r-...N>.ONÕ <"> ~ ~~-b"T~tA-to'T~U')- 1J1J1J1J1J1J"C Q) CD Q) (l) Q) Q) GJ U1J1J""O"OlJ'tJ '~'ß'ð'g'ß'gß ~è:è:d:è:à:å: 4) Q) Q) Q) Q) OJ GJ ccccccC 0000000 zzzzzzz tA-*~~tA-U')- 88888888 ~ªª§§§~ r...:-Òu1u1Òu1,....~ -.o-or-...NLt)N~ N C"') C"oI~ i:o"T-b't~U')- ~ tD ~ ~ D1 ~ ë u§§Q. CD Q) .... .- ø.. E"ã: 'QOõu ~~ è:~·~c e:r: cc;g-o C 0...- 0 Q) 0 ..... Q)E~ 1)~~ E-Q)cU' ~>-o "'t: Q) Q.'- 0 o~EE-go..5 Q.c~o..cEv; Q) .- 0 a:: Q. - c ~ðQ..e~ID.º o E~-~-Þ -=OW-U~v;ID Q)~g>«Q)Q)-o U.... v; :+:: 0 "'0 :::> Q) ..c « i.n c a.. Q. C 0> _ Q) Q) Co:: ~ ::J 00 > ::0 ð"Q>~Eê~'5 õ~~~~C"')~ ~ ~ Q) Q) U U '2' '2' Q) Q) V> V> ä) ID ä) 'Q) u u u u "> '2' '2' "2' ã; Q) (1) Q) en V) V) V) c .Q õ Q) t; Q) "" , -E-EBE-E.g.g V> VI VI U' v _. ~. 5555555 000 0 0 0 0 3"5"5"5"533 .£:..c..c:.c..c:..c..c uuuuuuu oooooõõ ,è,è,è,è.è.è,è (j(j(j(j(j(j(j 0000 ø Q; Qj w c c c c Q) Q) IV Q) l'Jl'Jl'Jl'J 00 ID Qj c C Q) Q) l'Jl'J ("')"'<t'-l)'Or--...c:o ("')C"')('f')C"')C"')C") 8 8 d ci 88 0:) t1J~ 1J "C Q) .. 1J "C 's;: "> o 0 è: .t Q) .. C " o 0 z z 00 o <:! Ó 8 ~ àd '" ..,. tI> 00 00 §" ,..; ¡;: I.Ò C"'I~ .., tI> ë .. E ~ ~ ~ ï:: C 'it .2 ~ ~ o VI a a. -< u a. - Ë o g 0 g'ï= C ._ .c. 0 Ü ~ & e .... ë ~ :E o .... ~ u e- o Q) D1ë Q) LU (5 6 c t; ~~ Q) Q) Q)Q) ~~ 00 uu >->- - - 'ë ï:: :> :> E E E E o 0 uu E E ~2 ~ ~ Q) Q) ~ ~ .£.£ "5"5 o 0 V> V> o .... 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 q 0 0 0 q C! <Ó vi <Ó C'Ì - '" 0 <>- .... '" 0 " <>- '" " 0 '" 0: ..¡ 0: <'i ..... Ñ ..... <>- '" " " '" "" '" "" o. ............ .... .... .... .". U U U U U U .., U .., Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) .. Q) .. u u u u u u .., u .., 'S: .:;: 'S: 'S: 'S: 'S: "> 'S: "> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 tt tt tt tt tt tt ot: D- ot: Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) .. Q) .. c: c: c: c: c: c: c c: c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z z z z z z z z $ 0 0 0 g 8 0 0 0 .,; ó .,; ó ..; <>- 0 0 "" 0 '" 0 " .... 0 '" vi <'i Ñ vi Ó -ò 0 '" '" '" ... .... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .". .... .". $ g g 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 q <Ó Ó § § .,; :ö - '" 0 ... 0 " <>- 0 - '" 0: ..¡ Ó .,; vi ..; Ñ ..... <>- '" 0 <>- ... "" '" " '" ............ .... .... .". .". Q CI Q .. ~ Q) 0. c( C E :¡¡ ~ .., õ 0 Q) :;; c 0 E " .... -e c: 0, 0 ~ ~ 0 c: .E u 0 ~ tt :2 ::;: ~ Q) 0 (¡¡ 0 õ ~ E :J: >- Q) 0 0 c c: :> 0. c: ~ :r: Õ .º .0 0 g .2 u .... 'ê Q) ü c: E 0 :> OJ 0 ~ 0 0 u c: >- 0 .'" c: :r: :r: 0 '¡;; u 'E Q) u tt :> 0 0 2 u E , .~ :r: « \= ë Q) Q) :::¡ OJ ~ Q) :¡¡ c: Õ '" '" u OJ ~ 0= c: 0 ,- Q) t; iL Q) .g .~ u ~ u ~ , c: c: ~ (5 u ~ (; E 0 :> '" '¡;; u 0 Õ ~ 0 ~ 0 c: 0 « « :r: «~ rr::U ;;. ;; Q) Q) ã) o 0 u Ë Ë '~ E E V) 00>- YY=E 00:> ~ ~ E '5 '5 E 000 "5"'5U J:: J:: >- U U 0 ~ '" oõ£ ~~:; DDa ::;~;f ,; a; Q) 0 u Ë .~ Q) E V) 0 ~ U .¡: E :> ~ E '> E Ü 0 0 "5 U Q) J:: >- 'õ" U 0 tt '" Õ J:: U ~ :; « « U 0 ::E V) " '" '" co " " " " 14-7 ~.-..... '(lS MAR ;.__.~" 21 AS:23 ¡in; C' ;::¡¡" ;,' ¡ SOUTHWESTERNCDU.e&E r'·-Ji .... -,.:"',.' .':·.,I.I_;,:n¡ g¡H ~lfR~~~~~~1¿P¡U·li/ MAR 1 6 2005, /"j:~ j ",;., " ,1..../; March 14, 2005 ~~~';'i~'~I:";""":J RECEIVED The Honorable Stephen Padilla Mayor, City ofChula Vista Chula Vista Mayor and Council Office 276 4th Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Dear Mayor Padilla: We are pleased to inform you and the City ofChula Vista that Southwestern College (SWC) has been awarded a $60,000 grant to conduct a summer National Youth Sports Program (NYSP) for economically disadvantaged youth ages 10-16. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Serviœs (DHHS) in partnership with the National Collegiate Athletic Association awarded this grant. This makes the sixth consecutive year that SWC and the DHHS have worked together in this matter. As you may be aware, NYSP is a structured sports and education program targeteq toward at-risk children. In 2005, 250 youths will be involved in our five-week program, which also will provide apprmamately 9,000 meals at no cost to the participants. Many local businesses and civic leaders donate goods and services, making NYSP a true citywide project. We also are working to build a coalition of community agencies. that will further enhance opportunities for our youth. It is commendable to know the City of Chula Vista supports this endeavor. As we prepare for the 2005 NYSP program, scheduled June 15 to July 17, we request your support and assistance in the following areas: (Î)Transportation: Free or reduced daily transportation to SWC via Sweetwater Union High School District (SUHSD) or other carrier service would greatly assist our ability to servic,e participant~. ~ducation Program: Resources available fiom city government, such as local fire fighters certified to teach first aid, CPR or fire safety, or any city employee willing to address careers within the city. 16-1 .. .. '"___n_'_......._..__ ",. _ _~__ .. _ .~..."- _. _._~_____ .,~_. ._. ._~~ _ ..._. ___ ..._ _...._, ."" ~.__ The Honorable Stephen Padilla March 14, 2005 Page No.2 3. Public Relations: Publicity ofNYSP fiom the city public relations office. 4. Staffing: Assignment of recreation department employees that will assist with the instruction ofNYSP. We are extremely excited about this opportunity to work in partnership with the City ofChula Vista and the economically disadvantaged youth of our community. This project has tremendous positive potential for our area and your support and endorsement is vitally needed. If you have any questions regarding this program, please do not hesitate to call me at (619) 482-6551. ì1=-. erely, . r ~ Bruce Turner Dean, School of Health, Exercise Science and Athletics Southwestern College BT/am c: Norma L. Hernandez, Superintendent/President, Southwestern College Terry Davis, Project Director, Southwestern College Linda Gilstrap, Director of Grants and Development, Southwestern College Julie Walker, National Youth Sports Program 16-2