Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Reso 2003-1810 AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 1810 AND COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2003-070 JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS, APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL FUNDS, AND AWARDING CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,168,930.00 FOR THE "PALOMAR STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM INTERSTATE 5 TO INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD (CIP NO. ST-922) PROJECT TO DALEY-CCAC, A JOINT VENTURE WHEREAS, on December 4, 2002, the Director of Engineering received the foilowing two sealed bids for the "Palomar Street Improvements, From Interstate 5 to Industrial Boulevard (CIP No. ST-922)" project: CONTRACTOR BASE BID 1. Daley-CCAC, A Joint Venture $2,168,930.00 2. Heffler Company, Inc. $2,788,980.00 WHEREAS, the total low bid from Daley-CCAC, A Joint Venture, is slightly above the Engineer's estimate of $2,053,640.00 by $115,290.00 or approximately 5.6%; and WHEREAS, due to the payment of prevailing wages for the project, staff feels that the low bid received is satisfactory and that re-advertisement of the project would not result in any significant cost savings; and WHEREAS, staff wiil incorporate the unit price bid results received into our database for future project cost estimates for prevailing wage projects; and WHEREAS, Engineering staff verified the contractor's references and their work has been satisfactory; and WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the low bid and is recommending awarding the contract to Daley-CCAC, A Joint Venture, in the amount of $2,168,930.00. WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and has determined that the proposed project was adequately covered under CEQA in Mitigated Negative Declaration IS- 99-07, which was previously adopted by the City Engineer on December 21, 2000, and under NEPA pursuant to Categorical Exclusion STPL-5203(009); thus, no further environmental review or documentation is necessary; and WHEREAS, in order to complete the project construction, an additional $800,000,00 in TRANSNET funds will need to be ailocated into the Palomar Street project from the future FY03-04 Pavement Rehabilitation project; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency/City Council has previously appropriated $170,000.00 from the Merged Project Area Tax Allocation Bond Proceeds for construction of the beautification component of this project, including Estrada Land Planning Consultant fees for construction document preparation and administration; and WHEREAS, the total funds needed are $220,690.00, therefore, an additional appropriation of $78,691.00 is needed to cover the shortfall. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept bids and award the contract in the amount of $2,168,930.00 for the "Palomar Street Improvements, from Interstate 5 to Industrial Boulevard (CIP NO. ST-922)" Project to Daley-CAC, a joint venture. Redevelopment Agency Resolution No. 1810 City Council Resolution No. 2003-070 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the appropriation of additional funds in the amount of $78,691.00 is hereby authorized from unexpended Redevelopment Agency 2000 Tax Allocation Bond proceeds in the Merged Project Area Fund. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby authorize to execute said contract on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by d?Æcd~ ('~Iífford T. Swanson 't" Director of Engineering Q m~0l-- Ann Moore City Attorney and Agency Counsel PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA this 18th day of February, 2003 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Members Davis, Rindone, Salas, McCann, Chair/Mayor Padilla None ABSENT: None ABSTENTIONS: None ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss: CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I, Laurie Madigan, Executive Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a fuil, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1810 and that the same has not been amended or repealed. Dated: October 6, 2003