The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRDA Reso 2001-1736 RESOLUTION NO. 1736 (COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2001-223\ JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 15-01-017 AND ITS ASSOCIATED MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN AND THE POLICE HEADQUARTERS MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has experienced significant growth and is projected to reach build-out within the next twenty years; and WHEREAS, staff has determined in order to ensure quality service from City departments that it is necessary to expand and modernize the Civic Center and to construct a new Police Headquarters; and WHEREAS, on August 1, 2000, the City Council approved an agreement with Highland Partnership, Inc. to prepare a Civic Center Complex expansion plan, and space needs programming and a conceptual design for the new Police Headquarters Facility; and WHEREAS, the Master Plan has been designed to maximize the reuse of existing buildings to reduce costs; minimize the impact on the surrounding community. and to meet the needs of the City staff and community through build-out; and, WHEREAS, the City's Community Development Department Planning and Environmental Manager reviewed the proposed Project and issued Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-01-017 for the project in accordance with CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby find, order, determine and resolve as follows: 1. The proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment however there will not be a significant effect if the mitigation measures are implemented; accordingly Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-01-017 was prepared and is hereby adopted in accordance with CEQA. 2. The proposed project is allowed under the General Plan and is consistent with the Town Centre I and II Redevelopment Plans and shall implement the purpose thereof; the project shall assist with the elimination of blight in the Project Area. 3. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista hereby approves the Civic Center Master Plan, which includes the expansion of the existing Civic Center and the construction of a new Police Headquarters at the Commercial Center Site in accordance with the Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Program in the document attached thereto as Exhibit 1. Resolution No. 1736 Page 2 Presented by Approved as to form by ~øl2.-Pe--~· David D. Rowlands, Jr. City Manager Q-r..-h /C J<> át: M. Kaheny Ò Ity and Agency Attorney Resolution No. 1736 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA this 17th day of July, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: Members Davis, Padilla, Salas, and Chair/Mayor Horton NOES: None ABSENT: Member Rindone ,. ABSTENTIONS: None J/#tbLß¡¿;¡¿ Shirley HQll:on Chairman ATTEST: @L~ ~~ Chris Salomone Executive Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss: CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I, Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1736 and that the same has not been amended or repealed. Dated: July 18, 2001 @~~. Chris Salomone Executive Secretary ~----_...--"'------_._,-,.~_._-_._'-_...._--_.._.._~.. _..._~--_..._-_.._._-,,--_.- EXHIBIT 1 Mitigated Negative Declaration .. MAR - J 2001 Project Name: Chula Vista Civic Center Master Relocation ; ; . r Plan: .-Aña-:-1'õlice" IIe:aè'}uartersi ,- ",..... -:"" -, ", ... '_\:,-. I ~ . , .'" -------.----- ". ¡ Project Location: Northwest comer of Fourth Avenue and F Street (Civic Center Complex), Southwest comer of Fourth Avenue and F Street (Mercy Site) Southeast comer of Fourth Avenue and F Street (Commercial Site) Southeast comer of Fourth Avenue and Davidson Street (Friendship Park Site) Northwest comer of Woodlawn Avenue and F Street (Corporation Yard Site) Assessor Parcel No: 568-110-32,33 (Civic Center Complex) 568-181-37-40,43,44 (Mercy Site) 568-270-03,11,10 (Commercial Site) 568-153-01 (Friendship Park Site) 567-031-27 (Corporation Yard Site) Project Applicant: City ofChula Vista Case No.: 1S-OI-017 Date: December 8, 2000 A. PROJECT SETTING The existing Civic Center Complex is bordered by Fourth Avenue to the east, Davidson Street to the north., and F Street to the south. The Civic Center is already developed and includes Administrative Building, the Public Service Building and the existing Police Headquarters along . with parking and landscaping. A part of the proposed Civic Center Master Plan Update is the construction of a new police headquarters facility. Four locations are being considered for the police headquarters. The setting associated with each of the four alternative sites is discussed below. Mercy. The Mercy site is a S-acre parcel located at the southwest comer of Fourth Avenue and F Street. The site is fully developed and includes office buildings, an SDG&E substation, surface parking and lan:dscaped areas. The existing administrative offices within the Civic Center are located across F Street to the north. Commercial uses associated with the Commercial site alternative are iocated on the other side of Fourth Avenue to the east. Multi-family residences are adjacent to the western boundary of the Mercy site. Single-family homes are adjacent to the south. The City of Chula Vista recently purchased the former Mercy office building and adjacent parlcing which together E I-I -,._.._._----~-----_._,.-.- represents approximately 1.6 acres of the total 5-acre lot. City staff are currently located in this building. CommerciaL The Commercial site is located at the southeast comer of Fourth Avenue and F Street. The site is improved with an office building, a commercial strip center, surface parking and landscaped areas. Surrounding uses include the City of Chula Vista Library to the north, a commercial office building and parking garage-to the east, condominiums to the south and a bank building to the west. The City of Chula Vista owns the EI Dorado Office building which is located on the west end of the site and which represents O~ 78 acres of the total 3.28 acre site. Friendship Park. The Friendship Park site encompasses 4.0 acres and is located at the southeast comer of Fourth Avenue and Davidson Street. The site is covered by landscaping and walkways and is used as a passive park for picnicking, reading and informal games. There are no buildings on the site. Surrounding uses include single- family residences to the north and east, the City of Chula Vista Civic Center to the west, and library to the south. Corporation Yard. This 6.0-acre site is located at the northwest comer of F Street and Woodlawn Avenue. The site is currently used by the City of Chula Vista for public works equipment storage and servicing. Uses include administrative offices, garages, vehicle repair facilities, storage areas and aboveground fuels tanks. Smounding uses include light industrial and multi-family residential to the south, multi-family to the east, hotel and trolley station to the north, and railroad and 1-5 to. the west. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of the revision and adoption of the City of Chula Vista Civic Center Master Plan and includes remodeling and expansion of the existing Civic Center complex and the construction of a new City of Chula Vista Police Headquarters. The combined improvements will total approximately 150,000 square feet of new building area and include approximately 430 parking spaces. Another 450 parking spaces may be provided in a future parking facility to be built within or in the vicinity of the Civic Center Complex; however, this would be part of a future phase and is not considered as a part of this evaluation. The remodeling and expansion of the Civic Center Complex is proposed to accomplish three primary goals: (1) consolidate City departments currently located in offsite office buildings into the Civic Center Complex, (2) expand and enhance the existing Administrative Building, and (3) convert the existing Police Headquarters to public service offices to allow for departmental consolidation and future groWth. A:3 illustrated on Figure 1, the existing Administrative Building will be remodeled and expmded with another 15,000 square feet of space to a total of 33,000 square feet. Major uses which would occur within the Administrative Building will include offices for the City Council members, City Clerk, City Attorney, City Manager, Finance, and Human Resources. The existing Public Service Building would be remodeled but the overall building area would remain 2 £' 1-.:) _______.____u ____"~".~__~._ ___..._._.._ at 29,000 square feet The existing Police Headquarters building would be remodeled to accommodate various Public Service Departments and to provide room for expansion as the demand for City staff increases in the future. The total area of the Police Headquarters building would remain at 50,000 square feet. In addition to the expansion and remodeling of buildings, additional parking and landscape would be included in the Civic Center Complex. A!J part of the proposed City of ChuJa Vista Civic Center Master Plan, the cmrent Police Headquarters would be moved from the Civic Center Complex to another location. The new Police Headquarters would consist of a facility of approximately 135,000 square feet The building would be two to three stories above grade and include a basement. The maximum height of the building would be 50 feet. There would be approximately 430 parking spaces provided in a combination of surface area and parking structure. The facility would accommodate a maximum of approximately 536 employees. It is anticipated that the patrols from the facility would operate with two to four shîfts per day, 24 hours a day. Vehicular 1Iaftic would consist of police personnel, unsworn personnel and visitors. The activities at this site would not include repair of the police vehicles and no fuel would be stored on site. The relocation site for the Police Headquarters has not been determined as yet. There are four sites which are currently being considered for the new Police Headquarters. Three of the sites are in the immediate vicinity of the Civic Center Complex; these sites are referred to as the Friendship Park sire, Mercy site and Commercial site. It should be noted, however, that, on December 5, 2000, the City Council directed staff to pursue rezoning the Friendship Parle site to parle land. A fourth site, referred to as the Corporation Yard site, is located appro¡rim"tely one- half mile west of the Civic Center Complex. While the size and uses associated with the relocated Police He:¡dquarters would remain essentially the same at all of the four alternative sites, the configuration of the buildings and parking areas would be dependent upon the location. Site plans for each of the four alternative sites for the Police Headquarters are illustrated in Figures 2A through 2D; their location is identified in Figure 3. C. ENVIROJ'ltMENTAL EFFECTS An Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached Environmental Checklist) determined that the proposed project in combination with other pending development in the area could have significant cumulative impacts on local traffic ~ While lighting associated with the proposed Police 'Headquarters would not represent a significant health and safety hazard, they could result in a significant land use compatibility impact by interfering with sleep in nearby residential uses. Noise from heating and ventilation equipment associated with the Police Headquarters could cause noise levels on adjacent residential property to exceed desired levels. Operational noise (e.g. police sirens and prisoner loading/unloading) could interrupt sleep in nearby residents. Construction of the Police Headquarters at the Friendship Park site would have a significant impact on =eation opportunities by elim;n"ting an existing park. Excavation at the Civic Center Complex and any of the four alternative sites for the Police Headquarters would impact geologic formations with a moderate to high potential to yield significant fossils. All other potential environmental affects would not be significant. 3 E /-3 Traffic Impact: The increase in traffic associated with the remodeling and expansion of the Civic Center Complex and construction of a new Police Headquarters would increase the local traffic - '(olumes by an estimated 406 automobile trIps In the AM peak hour ~lC volumes and 530 trIps in the PM peak hour. . - . ~le the additional project traffic would not siø-nific3I\tJJ¡ jP¡P¡¡Gt tbe level of serv~ce at any ~ the intersections in the vicinity of the DroD~~q.Rmi~Q~d_.tIj!ff'.Ç improvements would be - llC"""sary shOUla elt11er Ute rnendship Park or Corporation Yard sites be-š'êìëëtèaTõfllié f'oJice Ht:adquarte¡-s. :)elec1J.on of the Corporationo,yaro site would req¿;~ aiidftiõñãC right';f~wy and ¡¡-- new traffic signal to accommodate future traffic. Selection of the Friendship Park site would require widening of Davidson Street to allow two-way traffic between Fourth Avenue and the entrance driveway. Mitigation: Traffic impacts associated with the proposed project would he reduced to below a level of significance by the application of the following mitigation measures. Miiigation Measure 1: Should the Friendship Park site be selected for the Police Headquarte:~, the following roadway improvements shall be incorporated into the plans: · Improve Davidson Street between Fourth Avenue and the entrance to the new facility to provide for two-way traffic; and · Install barriers at the entrance to the facility on Davidson Street to discourage Police Headquarters traffic from entering the neighborhood to the nol,'th. Miiigation Measure 2: Should the Corporation Yard site be selected for the Police Headquarters, the following roadway improvements shall be incorporated in the plans: · Provide, as necessary, additional right of way along project frontage on Woodlawn Avenue to accommodate Class I Collector; · Install traffic signal at F Street and Woodland Avenue; and · Obtain an additional five feet of right of way along the north side of F Street adjacent to the site. Noise Impact: Exterior heating and ventilation equipment associated with the relocated Police Headquarters or Civic Center Complex remodeling and expansion could generate noise levels which would cause the noise levels in adjacent residential areas to exceed the standards . established in City's Noise Ordinance. Mitiption: Implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce potential heating and ventilation equipment noise to below a level of significance: 4 t::" I_U ___.____...__.____._______0,_____.__ Mitigation Measure 3: Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Police Headquarters or Civic Center Complex, a noise study shall be completed by a qualified acoustician to demonstrate that the heating and ventilation equipment has been sufficiently screened to insure that noise levels at the adjacent residential property lines do not exceed standards set forth in Table ill of the City's Noise Ordinance. Land Use Compatibility Impact: Light and noise associated with the proposed Police Headquarters could significantly impact nearby residential uses; particularly during night and early morning hours. Spill light and glare from outdoor light fixtures including parking lot and security lighting could disrupt sleep within adjacent residential units. Similarly, noise from police sirens, heating and ventilation equipment, and prisoner delivery/pick iIp could disrupt sleep as well as other residential activities such as television-watching and reading. Construction noise could also impact nearby residents should the hours of operation extend into the late night or early morning hours. Mitigation: Land use compatibility impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance through implementation of the following measures: Mitigation Measure 4: The operations of the Police Headquarters shall be conditioned to require the following: · Police responding to emergency calls from the Police Headquarters shall not operate sirens until they reach a major thoroughfare (e.g. Fourth Avenue or F Street); · Prisoners shall be loaded or unloaded in the underground parking garage; · Servicing of vehicles including testing sirens shall be prohibited; and · Outdoor public address systems shall be prolnèited. Mitigation Measure 5: Prior to issuance of a building pemrit for the Police Headquarters, the City shall develop a "Good Neighbor Policy". This Policy shall include operational guidelines and associated educational program for police personnel intended to m;n;m;7C potential conflicts with surrounding neighborhoods (e.g. screeching tire noise and radio noise from unattended . police vehicles). In preparing this Policy, the City shall seek input from the surrounding neighborhood. Mitigation Measure 6: Construction shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. on weekdays, and 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction shall occur on Sundays. Mitigation Measure 7: All outdoor light fixtures would be equipped with shields to avoid substantial spill light and/or glare onto adjacent residential areas. 5 þ/- .~ PaleontoloŒY Impact: Excavation within the Civic Center Complex or any of the four Police Headquarters sites could encroach into geologic formations containing important fossils. . Mitigation: Implementation of the following measure would reduce potential paleontological impacts to below a level of significance: MitigaJion Measure 8: A qualified paleontologist shall monitor major excavation activities to determine if any important fossils could be adversely impacted. If important fossils could be impacted, the paleontologists shall devise and implement an appropriate salvage program. Recreation Impact: Construction of the Police Headquarters on the Friendship Park site would result in the loss of 3.5 acres of passive recreation area in the City's core. This would have a significant impact on recreation opportunities in the area. Mitigation: The loss of recreation would be reduced to below a level of significance through implementation oÍthe following mitigation measure: Mitigation Measure 9: Prior to issuance of a grading permit for a Police Headquarters on the Friendship Park site, the City shall identify a replacement site from Friendship Park within the same vicinity, and approve a plan which would create passive recreation opportunities within three years of the date the grading permit is issued. 6 F/ -0 ....-"--.-....--.----.--.-"---.--.-. _.__.. __..______---- _______ __.'____ _'._n.' .n._.__.....______ D. CONSULTATION 1. City ofChula Vista Marilyn Ponseggi, Planning Division Benjamin Guerrero, Community Development Ralph Leyva, Engineering Division Dan Hardman, Police Department Elizabeth Hull, City Attorney's Office Applicant's Agent Debra De Pratti, Highland Partnership Dave Nielson, MNA Consulting Traffic Consultant Dan Marum, BR W Geology Consultant Clifford Craft, LawGibb Group Gregory Rzonca, Lav.-Gibb Group Noise Consultant Charles Terry, Douglas Eilar & Associates 2. Documents City of Chula Vista General Plan and EIR (1999) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code Engineering Geologic Reconnaissance for Southeast Comer of F Stref:t and 4th Avenue (LawGibb Group, 2000) Engineering Geologic Reconnaissance for Southwest. Comer ofF Stref:t and 4111 Avenue (LawGibb Group, 2000) Eng;.neering Geologic Reconnaissance for Corporation Yard (LawGibb Group, 2000) Engineering Geologic Reconnaissance for SoutheaSt Comer of Davidson Street and 4th Avenue (LawGibb Group, 2000) Traffic Study/Alternative Site Analysis of Civic Center Master Plan and Police Headquarters Relocation (BRW, December 8, 2000) . Noise Impact Analysis of Retail Block Site (Douglas Eilar & Associates, November, 2000) Noise Impact Analysis of Mercy Site (Douglas Eilar & Associates, November, 2000) Noise Impact Analysis of Friendship Park Site (Douglas Eilar & Associates, November, 2000) 7 £ 1- ì Eo DETERlVUNATION On the basis of the Initial Study prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and associated Guidelines, and the City of Chula Vista's Environmental Review Procedures, the City of Chula Vista concludes that the proposed remodeling and e:.-pansion of the Civic Center Complex and relocation of the Police Headquarters would not have a significant impact on the environment provided the mitigation measures described in this Mitigated Negative Declaration area implemented. ~~~- Community Development 8 ~/-<;! {2·8· 00 Date --~-----~-,..-.....,.,---- ), -;- -'--:1 -, >~ '" ~ y;- '- .~ ~':I -.,. , .~ ~ -, -:\ ~{; ;:'j' ÈC .~ : F_~n", I ">'~h '~', '>: , -::~.<. ~ ............. ·itr 'j -.. --:" '-.;"):"';" '-\;, , .~- ~ ,.", ' :i1~-: _ . 11 " ~~ ':r.', -~y~_! "~..~." ~i '£4\:'-..,51'- c >, ~""!>. . ..l " " ., ':~.~ A:-""," '.. ",".'._,_~ . . ~r .... :.... ~,?:O:':;-y.. ,...... <'i1 - .~~;"::.:; ", {":. ~-'-' , ':"'-. .. "" - m -. .,.:,.,:.- ....,,:- _ ~~"'?'~~~_~11y?i/~~. (ì Y/~:. ~::B'>:i~~ ~:-8~~ .t'W,," ;-.:;', ,~~ .~ 'ª' ~ :...$11.~,-... . <-'~' I.:~~~ .:.._~ .~ç~_" ....~. .:~þ.., 'f ~'----., ~ ¡vie Center Complex Site Plan Figure 1 @' \lot ToSçajc f? ?%~~:~~~1!Ç,;:~~,~~·1.!~:~-ry £/-9 ------- ¡--¡---r , i .I. .J ~ \~_ L, I . i J U_~~~"J ~ ¡=~-_:/ , I ¡'~Î-"'\ , , I I: , , . I I ~J (.' I , ~ OJ Z ~ > <: :I: >- ~ OJ o ~ ~<~ .VlSITOR PARKING r""-·"".'W:""" !I \ lliECURED ---.J! 5U-¡Û:Aê~KKING ---Li , I l: :J I ~ ~ EXISTING I UBRARY [J ¡ POSSIBLE~ [] I STRUCTURED I PARKING ¿J I 3 LEVELS I 200 SP. D ß I D I 1 ~ ! \ I tj' r [] I 11 n..J.-~_ ~ ----- r --:-~ -- fSTREET (I ' I ..........-- SITE PlAN (!)N IIOC~: U' ~a~ \ '- '- ,----: ) \., ""---.-- lÌì II .¡ i:' :,11 :1 ~ ! ~! ! ;;1 ,I] 'I ,-- , , j rn ~-- ~-- f--- L__ I I' -1.1 I I I , 1I."~a'_'" KllIWcuut'.t.IIIHC,·IS' SITE SECTION SITE AREA, 4.0 ACRES TOTAL BUIlDING AREA , llilRD flOOR AREA , SEGOND flOOR AREA , GROUND fLOOR AREA , BELOW GRADE fLOOR ARE.-> 145,000 G.S.f. 2S,000 G.S.f. 30,000 G.S.f. SO,OOO C.S.f , 40,000 G.S.f. . Aice Headquarters Site Plan: Friendship Park Site E / - /0 'I TOTAL PARKING SPACES , 5005P. STRUCTURED PARKING, 0 SURfACE PARKING, 50 VIS. > 100 SEe. BELOW GRADE PARKING, 1 SO SEG. Off-SITE PARKING, 200 SEG. tÐ, '"ToS,,", Figure 2A P ~,~F¿':~l~;~~:t;·~TA'~~ ---- _ --....-.-- .-..- -- --- -~--'-------- Yt~jf--:'-c~;:--- ,,\('-,-;~ ¡ i'-, [ CC···· " 1 ~ / ,/,// ......." SITE PLAN 2JN srrE SECTION SITE AREA ¡ 5.0 ACRES .'f , , 'J .-.J I EXI5TIN~ BUILDIN!-' EXISTING BUILDING 1õI.r.:MC:.".o..uo:.e;,:¡o 3üDW~f..ou¡p,¡c;,_lr TOTAL BUILDING AREA: THIRD fLOOR AREA ¡ SECOND fLOOR AREA : GROUND fLOOR AREA ¡ BELOW GRADE flOOR AREA ¡ - Aice Headquarters Site Plan: Mercy Site I ----'----,------:-_----,-.-_ ,"\1 i' ~/ " ~--l~~-- I i I ¿J ;: )-I-~EET ':r..'0Ç';;¡ -~ I '-~'~-~ì :1 I II ~ DrnHIOINUIW~'_c¡ ~~ ~"S' 145,000 G.S.f. 25,000 G.S.f. 30,000 G.S.f. 50,000 G.S.f 40,000 G.S.f. -~-~-- , -.-.-------... \. ~ :0 Z ~ > ... r >- '" :0 o ~ I ~I~I , , , I~k /~'.......,. 1 , ., I , , i I I TOTAL PARKING SPACES : 500 SP. 5TRUCTURED PARKING: 0 SURFACE PARKINC : 50 VIS. + 240 SEe. BELOW CRADE PARKINC ¡ 210 SEe. OfF·Sm PARKING ¡ 0 fÐ' '",ToS,,", /:= 1- II Figure 2B P ,f.R2!:-~~!7!~~,£?~::.¡;~T~.~~ ~.-....- '--,...,... """_', ·~"·'~·m , .1 " 'I , // ~---~--// C-,~ I I ! I I I I I I I I ¡ I i _J SITE PLAN 'F)N SITE SECTION SITE AREA; 3.6 ACRES I I i' 1 " :, l ~- I '-.,:_----=.:c c:'~~=;-c:::-;~~-= ~__=;::~-~-;,-" ~ - " EXISTING LIBRARY ,-.- , t=-:.~--=- '~~-;-; '---< ~- F $TREEr I I I I w => z w > .. J: >- '" => o ~ ~-= -~~ I j I, ! I: ¡ I.'. i. ' U I ~'~ '-.'""" .;~.,. V VISITOR !J ,- SURFACE PARKING (" I, ;:;>,~ 't. ~:~~'_J ';;;":SECURED ",""-"n . -·),STRUCTURED PARKING"" ;~~'~ '.' <-"'î;':;:::;~ 1 r- . , )i " I' ~ I I: il I: ,I II, T ,'"'0 r~ ~~I' 011' L..,-1 , ' ~~_- t,,~ ii 1-----'ct1~ "" II I I l I : I ,,[ ) C i i .--! i~ :11 IIOOI,.S· .,~ " _ u _. .-:.~,-,.: ·--7:<~.- "~"~',,:,_:,,_,,-. ,; '_' ..: c.~~·-: '.... ..~.~ -'- - mt\.IcrUIIU)"_,U;:IJ" suw.a ,-, 11 JD.OWCilWKPAIIaNG,·1S" H Il TOTAL BUILDING AREA; , 3S,000 G.S.F. THIRO FLOOR AREA; 20,000 G.S.F. SECOND FLOOR AREA; 25,000 G.S.F. GROUNO FLOOR AREA. 45,000 G.S.F BELOW GRAOE FLOOR AREA, 45,000 G.S.F. TOTAL PARKING SPACES ; 430 SP. STRUCTURED PARKING; 260 SURFACE PARKING, 40 VIS. BELOW GRADE PARKING; 130 SEe. OFF-SITE PARKING; 0 - Aice Headquarters Site Plan: Commercial Site Figure 2C @,¡ ,,,T,S,,,,, p ~~%~~:~~.~?:~~Lr~:~~ E / - /;;< SITE PLAN (!IN SITE SECTION SITE AREA, 6.0 ACRES I I o I I!~~QUI ~. -. I i , ¡, '-- i, , , ¡I: I I ¡ , ' I II, , ' , , ' I ¡I, , ' , , ' I II: , ' , , ' I II i : : i II, : : i II, ; , , , ' I II, , , I /: i! : , , I , I, I , llL__-1______________ :¡ :LJ I' 12 I ,- .1 I~ II '« IIJ@ I ~~ ~=> ~I" ~ '" 2 ¡z '" ;:: ~ u Œ '" => ~ F STREET ~'~,Ir II _.a._.. ~q ....~ " ~ ~ TOTAL BUILDING AREA , THIRD FLOOR AREA , SECOND FLOOR AREA , GROUND FLOOR AREA : BELOW GRADE FLOOR AREA , 145,000 G.S.F. 25,000 G.S.F. 30,000 G.S.F. 50,000 G.S.F 40,000 G.S.F. 1_- j~ '" Z ¡z '" « ~ ~ ·U Œ '" => ~ '" o t::. . i < s: . :r I -iJ I I to ~ I oJ------ , , ! . w => Z ~ Z ;: :5 c o c ;: -------- \;:::- TOTAL PARKINC SPACES STRUCTURED PARKING, SURFACE PARKING, BELOW GRADE PARKING: OFF·SITE PARKING, , 500 SP. 140 SEe. SO VIS. + 310 SEe. o o )/ice Headquarters Site Plan: Corporation Yard Site E 1-/-;;; tÐN '.ToS"" Figure 2D f? ~~.tl9,"£~.s.!~~,Sf?,~~~"T~.~ ~..___ '__<o",~ ,..,,,.... '"''''~.''' ~ "'J;:- ~ .~ -^ ~ '< :::: ~ ~ ~ r~ i' '-..I:...; º ~ ~ , ~¡ C"" ~ .. , , o ì ./'. ....< Ù " -¡:¡ u en c ¡- Õ z -Et , ~ , ] 1 ~ ~ ~: ~s ":- ~~ E:N-vIRONl\1ENTAL CHECKLIST Project Title: Chula Vista Civic Center Master Plan and Police Headquarters Relocation Case No.: IS-OI-I7 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Contact Person and Phone Number: Benjamin Guerrero City of Chula Vista (619) 476-5311 Date: December 8, 2000 L EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project using the environmental checklist incorporated ñom the CEQA Guidelines as amended in January 1, 1999. A "No Impact" answer is given when the information sources show that the impact does not apply to the proposed project A "Less than Significant Impact" is given when information sources indicate that impacts or changes in the environment would occur, but those impacts are below the threshold of significance. "Potentially Significant Impact" is indicated if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures. has reduced an effect fi:om "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact" a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? POl!:l1tially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact D D ~ D D 0 D ~ Issues and Supporting Information L AESTIIETICS - Would the project: b) Substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? E I - I~ ~--~-.-,---_._-_._._-~_.- -~---_._._+.-_.._--- Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Infonnation Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Substantially degrade the eXlstmg visual 0 0 0 cg] character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or 0 0 cg] 0 glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Explanation: The expansion and remodeling of the existing Civic Center will not have a significant impact on aesthetics since the site is not located in the viewshed of an identified scenic route, vista or view. Because the use already exits on~site, the addition of 15,000 square feet to the existing Civic Center will not significantly impact views of surrounding properties. None of the four alternative locations for the police headquarters is located within the viewshed of a scenic route, vista or view. However, development of a new police headquarters at any of the four alternative locations may result in a less than significant impact to light and glare due to a possible intensification of land uses beyond what currently exists. While three of the four alternative locations (Mercy, Commercial and Corporate Yard) are currently developed, the construction of the police headquarters would alter existing land uses which might be perceived by surrounding uses as a new source of light and glare. However, the impact would be reduced to a less than significant level by incorporating shielding of exterior light and screening into the building design. In addition to the potential increase in light and glare, development of a Police Headquarters at the Friendship Park site would also change the visual character of the area by converting the site from landscaped open space to a developed condition. While the loss of the open space would adversely affect the visual character, the impact would not reach a level of significance due to the overall urbanized character of the surrounding area. Issues and Supporting Infonnation 2. AGRlCUL TIJRE RESOURCES - In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and fannland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact o o D cg] 2 PI-I/¿. Issues and Supporting infonnation Fannland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the eXIsting environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of F annland, to non-agricultural use? Potendally Significant Impact o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated o o Less Than Significant Impact o o No Impact rg] [gJ Explanation: The project site and alternative locations for the Police Headquarters would not result in impacts to agricultural resources. The sites are fully developed and no agricultural activity currently takes place on-site. Issues and Supporting infonnation 3. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following detenninatian.s. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 3 !=-/ -/ ì Potentially Significant Impact o o o D o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D o o o D Less Than Significant Impact [gJ [gJ [gJ o o No Impact D D o [g] rg] Explanation: The expansion and remodeling of the Civic Center and development at any of the alternative locations for the Police Headquarters would not result in impacts to air quality since the number of auto trips for both the Civic Center expansion and development of a new Police Headquarters at any of the locations would not substantially increase from the current number of auto trips at the existing Civic Center, Police Headquarters and other existing land uses. There would be no substantial stationary emissions, no creation of objectionable õdors and no alteration which might result in climate change. Since there would be no significant increase in emissions considered to be hannful to air quality, there would no impacts to adjacent users. The parking structures would be adequately ventilated to avoid air quality impacts to people using the parking Structure. Issues and Supporting Information 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any npartan habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, '?Castal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantiaIly with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 4 !=/-/ft/ Potentially Significant Impact o D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation !ncorpor.rted o D D o o Less Than Significant Impact D D D o D No Impact cg] !ZJ !ZJ cg] !ZJ Issues and Supponing Infonnarion f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorpor.u:ed Impact 0 0 0 No Impact r;g] Explanation: The sites are devoid of native or sensitive natural vegetation, They are currently developed with a variety of urban land uses including office buildings, paved surfaces and landscaped areas. There are no endangered, sensitive species, habitats or wildlife migration corridors on the project site or at any of the alternative locations for the Police Headquarters. Therefore, the project would result in no impacts to biological resources. Issues and Supponing Infonnation 5. CULTIlRAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuantto § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of fonnal cemeteries? Potentially Significant Impact o o o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact fZ] fZ] o fZ] Explanation: The project site and alternative locations for the Police Headquarters will not result in impacts to archaeological resources because there are no identified resources on-site and the sites are already developed. None of the buildings which could be demolished to accommodate the Police Headquarters are considered historic. o o The geologic formation underlying the Civic Center Complex as well as all four of the Police Headquarters alternative sites has a moderate to high potential for cont,,;n;ng significant fossils. Thus, excavation could impact fossil-bearing material. A qualified paleontologist shall monitor the excavation process. If significant fossils are encountered, the monitor shall undertake a salvage plan, as necessary, to recover any significant fossils. 5 £/-/'1 o o fZ] o D D -_.__._-_.._.._----_._~- --------~._._..._,._.__..- .__.__.._~--_._-_..- Issues and Supporting Infonnarion 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: '. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the Stare Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-I-B of the Unifonn Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated o o o o o o o o Less Than Significant Impact [g1 [g1 [g1 o [g1 [g1 [g1 o No Impact o o D ~ D D D ~ Explanation: There will be no changes in the existing topography or in any unique geologic or physical features as a result of the Civic Center expansion and remodeling or development at any of the possible Police Headquarters alternative locations. The project site and alternative locations are all currently improved with existing buildings, asphalt parking and landscaped areas. The project site and the four alternative locations for the Police Headquarters will require grading and will result in minimal disruptions, displacements compaction or uncovering of soils. 6 != / - .~ 0 The project site and the four alternative locations for the Police Headquarters are located in a region where active faulting and seismically-induced ground shaking is possible. However, these impacts are considered less than significant due to the implementation of the requirements of the State of California and City of Chula Vista regarding earthquake-safe buildings. Engineering geologic reconnaissances were conducted for each of the four alternative locations for the Police Headquarters (LawGibb Group, 2000). While the geologic reêormaÎssances indicated no geologic or soils conditions which would pose a significant risk to development, appropriate mitigation measures will be incorporated to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Both a comprehensive geotechnical investigation and a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment will be required as part of the City of Chula Vista st3ndard requirements for approval of a grading pennit for the site selected for the new Police Headquarters. Implementation of the requirements of both reports would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Possible increases in the wind or water erosion of soils are less than significant due to the minimal amount of grading involved and through the implementation of best management practices (EMP) such as desiltation basins, sandbags and other erosion control methods which are required by the City of Chula Vista as part of the approval process for pennits. Implementation of uniform building code (UBC) requirements will avoid the potential exposure of people or property to geologic hazards at the proposed project site and at all of the alternative locations for the Police Headquarters. Potentially Significant· Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Infonnation Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS- Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 D ~ environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 D ~ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous 0 0 D cg] or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list 0 0 D cg] of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code § 65962.5 and, as a result, 7 £/-¿;¡/ _~~,____,___"__..__~_~_.____4____··__·_~_ Issues and Supporting Infonnation would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physicaJly interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences arc intcnnixed with wildlands? Poccntially Signiñcant Impact o o o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation IncOJl'oratcd Less Than Signiñcant Impact No Impact ¡;g] ¡;g] D ¡;g] Explanation: No impacts ÍÌom hazards or hazardous materials would result from implementation of the expansion of the Civic Center or from development at any of the alternative locations for the Police Headquarters. The project site and alternative locations are not located in the vicinity of safety hazards and there will be no increase in the use and storage of hazardous materials beyond that which occurs currently. No hazardous emissions would result from the proposed development. o o While Fourth Avenue is identified as one of the Evacuation Routes in the City's General Plan, . . the project will not result in impacts since there will not be a significant increase in the overall population in the vicinity. . o o o ¡;g] o o The project site is not located within two miles of a public or private 3Ùport. As no wild1and areas exist in the project area, no risk of wildland fires exists. 8 EI-;;l;) Issues and Supporting Infonnation Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems Of provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff'! f) Otherwise substantially degrade watef quality? g) Place housing within a IOO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map Of . othef flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a IOO-year flood hazard area structures which would impede Of redirect flOod flows? 9 £/-:.)3 o o o o o o o o o D D D D D D D ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ D o o cg] o o o o cg] cg] Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Infonnation Impact Incorporated Impact Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk 0 0 0 cg] of loss, injwy or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 0 0 ~ Explanation: Expansion of the Civic Center and development at any of the four alternative locations for the Police Headquarters would not result in significant impacts to hydrology or water quality. No use of groundwater would occur as the development would be connected to the City water supply. With the exception of the Friendship Park site, all of the project sites are already developed, no significant increase in impermeable surface area would occur. Consequently, no substantial increase in surface runoff would occur. Similarly, the proposed land uses would not be significantly different fi:om existing uses which would mean that the quality of surface runoff would not diminish significantly. Implementation of current practices to control water runoff contained in the City's Grading and Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinances would reduce impacts potential short-term water quality impacts to a less than significant level. Runoff would be transported to existing storm drains serving the development areas. Since the volume of runoff will not increase substantially, the existing storm drain system will continue to accommodate runoff in the area. Although development of Friendship Park would convert the mostly permeable surface area to imp=eable surface area, the increase in runoff would not be sufficient to overtax the existing storm drain system serving the site. Standard drainage improvements incorporated into a future Police Headquarters would be sufficient to avoid hydrology impacts. In addition, the small size of the Police Headquarters building area in proportion to the overall drainage basin would preclude significant water quality impacts fi:om any urban runoff pollutants generated fi:om the site. Furthermore, compliance with local and state requirements for storage of hazardous materials would avoid significant water quality impacts fi:om the use of any such materials associated with operation of the Police Headquarters. Potenually Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Infonnation Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? D C?SJ 0 D 10 1= ! - :u/ Issues and Supporting Infonnation b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation or an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general pian, specific pian, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an . environmental effect? Potentially Significant Impact PotentIally Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact D D ~ o c) Conflict with any conservation plan or conservation plan? applicable habitat natural community D' D D ~ Explanation: The proposed project would not physically divide the land uses which currently exist within the general vicinity of the Civic Center Complex and Police Headquarters alternative sites. All of the affected areas are already developed with non-residential uses. No streets would be closed as a result of the proposed project Although barriers would be constructed on Davidson Street in the event the Friendship Park site is selected for the Police Headquarters, these barriers would only discourage Police Headquarters traffic from entering the adjacent residential area. It would not constrain residential access. While the proposed project would not physically divide the surrounding community, the Police Headquarters would potentially impact surrounding residential areas due to lighting and noise associated with the proposed use. As discussed in Sections I and 11 of this Environmental Checklist, the lighting and noise associated with the Police Headquarters would not create significant health and safety impacts. However, these factors could result in significant land use compatibility· conflicts with adjacent residential uses by creating nuisance-level impacts. Land use compatibility impacts could be significant during late night and early morning hours when nearby residents are trying to sleep. Excess light spill and glare into sleeping quarters could disrupt sleep activities. Potential light sources include security lighting on buildings and in parking areas. All outdoor lighting associated with the Police Headquarters would be fitted with shields and/or positioned to minimize spill light and glare on adjacent residential properties. As discussed in Section 11 of this Environmental Checklist, police car sirens and loading/unloading of prisoners could create a nuisance for nearby residents which could disrupt sleep patterns. Although the potential exists for police sirens to affect adjacent residents, the impacts would not represent a significant land nse compatibility impact for several reasons. One of the primary reasons is the limitation to be imposed on police cars responding to emergencies from the proposed Police Headquarters. Responding units would be prohibited from turning on their sirens until they reach a major thoroughfare (e.g. Fourth Avenue or F Street). Police sirens are already being used on these streets. Thus, this limitation would assure that disruption from sirens is no greater than occurs from the existing Police Headquarters which is located in the same general vicinity as three of the four alternative sites. The Corporation Yard site, although 11 ~/-?~ -------_._._._.._-----~-----."--- ---_."---".__._~--~- not near the existing Police Headquarters, is already located near inajor noise sources including Interstate 5 and the San Diego Trolley. In addition, relatively few emergency responses originate at the Police Headquarters (Dan Hardman, Chula Vista Police Department). Patrol cars out on the streets are usually the primary units responding to emergency situations. Further factors restricting potential land use compatibility impacts from Police Headquarters noise include prohibitions against: (I) outdoor public address systems, (2) vehic1e-servicing and repair, and (3) siren testing. In addition, prisoners are proposed to be loaded and unloaded within the underground parking areas to minimize adverse effects of unusually vocal individuals. The Civic Center and the alternative locations for the Police Headquarters are located within the City of Chula Vista's "Urban Core" and the major facilities existing or planned for this area are designated in the Central Chula Vista Area Plan. This area C{)ntaÎns the greatest diversity of urban facilities in the City in a generally low to medium density urban development. The City of Chula Vista's General Plan states that this area "will expand both the concentration and diversity of facilities" and will continue to reinforce its role as the urban core of the city. The project is consistent with adopted plans and ordinances. It will implement the goals of the City of Chula Vista General Plan as well as the Central Chula Vista Area Plan. Lastly, as none of the properties involved in the proposed project exhibit any natural vegetation or support wildlife species, the project would not have a significant impact on regional biological resource planning efforts. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project a) Result in the loss or availability of a known D 0 0 ~ mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally 0 0 0 ~ important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Explanation: No impacts to mineral resources will result from project implementation. There are no known mineraI resources located beneath the Civic Center Complex or any of the alternative locations for the Police Headquarters. 12 F / _ ?f_ Issues and Supporting Information ¡ 1. NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards or other agencies? or generation of vibration or b) Exposure of persons to excessive groundbome groundbome noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Significant Impact o o D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated ~ o ~ o o o Less Than Significant Impact [J ~ D ~ D D No Impact o o o o ~ ~ Explanation: Construction of the Police Headquarters would introduce new noise sources into the areas which surround the four alternative sites. Increases in ambient noise levels would be of particular importance to noise-sensitive activities such as residential, hospitals or other uses which generally require low noise levels. As discussed earlier, both single- and multi-family residential uses lie adjacent to some portion of all of the Police Headquarters alternative sites. Potential noise sources associated with the Police Headquarters would include police car sirens, exterior heating and ventilation equipment, loading/unloading prisoners, and general parking lot activity (e.g. car engines and conversation). Acoustical studies prepared for the alternative sites prepared by Douglas Eilar & Associates concluded that, with the possible exception of heating and ventilation equipment, noise from the Police Headquarters would not create a significant health and safety hazard. With the exception of heating and vF!!'lrilmion equipment, noise sources would be sporadic and not of sufficient frequency or volume to exceed acceptable noise levels. As discussed in Section 9, police sirens would not be activated until the vehicle reaches a major street and emergency responses do not usually originate from the Police Headquarters. In 13 F / -? 7 .----------. ----------_._._---- addition, current ambient noise levels on all Police Headquarters alternative sites, primarily related to traffic noise, are already higher than the levels nonnaIly acceptable for residential areas. Measuremenrs taken by Douglas Eilar & Associates identified ambient Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) as high as 65 dB(A) in nearby residential areas. With respect to hearing and ventilation equipment, the project would be conditioned to require that acoustical scrœning be installed around all exterior heating and ventilation equipment to assure that noise generated by this equipment would not exceed the maximum noise levels established in Table ill of the City of Chula Vista's Noise Ordinance. Under this ordinance, noise generators must not cause noise levels at the property line in adjacent residential areas, with the exception of multi-family development, to exceed 45 dB between the hours of 10 p.rn. and 7 a.m. on weekdays, and 10 p.rn. and 8 a.rn. on weekends; at all other times of the day, noise generators shall not cause noise levels in residential areas to exceed 55 dB. For multi-family, the noise limits are 50 dB at night and 60 dB during the day. While noise associated with the Police Headquarters would not result in a significant health and safety hazard, periodic noise related to police car sirens and unloadinglIoading of vocal prisoners could create a land use compatibility impact on adj acent residential uses by disturbing sleep activities. This concern is discussed in more detail in Section 9 of this Environmental Checklist. Remodeling and expansion of the Civic Center Complex would not have a significant impact on surrounding land uses. The proposed improvements would not introduce any new noise sources nor would it increase noise generated by existing uses. Any new heating and ventilation equipment would be screened to assure that noise levels meet Table ill of the City's Noise Ordinance. Relocation of the Police Headquarters would, in fact, eliminate an existing noise source on the site. Construction noise could have a significant impact on residential areas located adjacent to the Civic Center Complex as well as the Police Headquarters sites. Construction equipment noise would be expected to periodically exceed noise levels desired in residential areas. However, the short-term natUre of construction noise and the limitations to be imposed by the City on the hours when construction can take place will reduce construction noise impacts to below a level of significance. Construction shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. between Monday and Friday and 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday. No construction would be allowed on Sunday. Issues and Supporting Information 12. POPULATION Ai."II) HOUSING- Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact o o o [g] 14 I::: I _ -¡ (") Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Infonnation Impact Incorporated Impact [mpac: b) Displace substantial numbers of existing 0 0 D ~ housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, D D D ~ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Explanation: There will be no impacts to population and housing resulting from the project. The project will not cause the City to cumulatively exceed the state or regional projections nor would it induce substantial growth. No housing, including affordable units, would be lost or created as a result of the proposed expansion of the Civic Center or as a result of construction of a Police Headquarters at any of the alternative locations. The demand for housing would not change significantly since the uses proposed exist already and no significant changes in staffing levels are expected. Therefore, the demand for housing would remain the same. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than . Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Impact Incorporated Impact Impac: 13. PUBLIC SERVICES: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities., need for new or physically altered govermnentaI facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? D D ~ C Police protection? D D 0 cg) Schools? 0 D D ~ Parks? D cg¡ D 0 Other public facilities? D D ~ D 15 t=/-.JC; --------_._----_.._._-_.-._~--- Explanation: The expansion of the Civic Center and development at any of the alternative locations for the Police Headquarters would not generally result in significant changes to service ratios, response times or performance objectives. Fire protection, schools and other public facilities would remain unchanged as a result of implementation of the project and development of a new Police Headquarters. Construction of a new Police Headquarters could result in improvement to response times for police protection due to improved efficiency. Development of the Police Headquarters at the Friendship Park location would result in potentially significant impacts to parks due to the loss of park areas. The loss of park area would require dedication of additional park land in the area. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Infonnation Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14. RECREATION: a) Would the project increase the use of existing 0 [g] 0 0 neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such the substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities 0 0 0 [g] or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Explanation: No impacts to recreation would result fÌom the expansion of the Civic Center or development at three of the four locations (Mercy, Corporate Yard and Co=ercial sites) for the Police Headquarters since there would be no anticipated increase in population and therefore in the use of existing parks. Development of the Police Headquarters at the Friendship Park could result in potentially significant impacts to other recreational facilities. The 3.5 acres of passive parkland would be replaced with buildings which could result in users of Friendship Park shifting their activities to other sites. While the expansion and remodeling of the Civic Center would result in some additional passive recreational areas, the loss of Friendship Park would be a potentially significant impact unless mitigation measures were incorporated to replace the loss of parkland. 16 ¡::::-! -30 Issues and Supporting Information 15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFlC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed., either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Potential[y Significant Impact o o o o o o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated o ~ o o o o o Less Than Significant Impact ~ o o ~ o ~ o No Impact o o ~ o ~ o ~ Explanation: A traffic study was conducted by BRW to assess the impacts of the remodeling and expansion of the Civic Center Complex, and relocation of the Police Headquarters. As the morning and evening peak hour periods are the most critical times for local traffic circulation, the traffic study focused on the project impacts during these time frames. Based on this study, the redevelopment of the Civic Center Complex and relocation of the Police Headquarters would add an estimated 406 automobile trips to the AM peak hour traffic volumes and 530 trips to the PM peak hour. It should be noted that this is a conservative estimate because it treats all of the automobile trips related to the Police Headquarters as new trips even though the existing facility is generating some number of trips already. In addition, the traffic volume estimate does not back out trips which are being generated from the current uses which would be eliminated on alternative sites by construction of the Police Headquarters. Thus, the estimated traffic generation is likely higher than may actually occur. 17 1=/-31 -'--_._'---~---- When the additional trips from the Civic Center Complex and any of the three PoJice Headquarters sites within the general proximity of the Civic Center Complex were added to the ten local intersections which were evaluated in the traffic study, it was determined that none of the intersections would be significantly impacted by the increase related directly to the proposed project All of the intersections would continue to operate a level of service (LOS) of D or better. Further, when traffic from three other approved but undeveloped projects in the area of the Civic Center Complex (Southbay Regional Center Expansion, Scripps Memorial Hospital Expansion and Gateway Project) was added to the increase in traffic from the proposed project, the traffic study concluded that the combined increase would not have a significant impact on any of the 10 intersections. With respect to the Corporation Yard site, the addition of Police Headquarters traffic to Woodlawn Avenue could cause the overall traffic volume on Woodlawn Avenue to exceed the desired volume for its current configuration. Expansion of Woodland Avenue to a Class I Collector roadway may be necessary between E and F Street. Additional right of way would also be required on the north side of F Street adjacent to the site. A signal would likely be required at Woodlawn Avenue 80d F Street. With respect to air traffic patterns, the proposed proj ects would have no impact. With the exception of the Friendship Park and Corporation Yard sites for the Police Headquarters, the traffic analysis concluded that no specific roadway modiñcations were necessary to accommodate the proposed uses. No new traffic signals are required on 80y of the unsignalized intersections immediately adjacent to the Civic Center Complex or the three nearby Police Headquarters alternative sites. Should the Friendship Park site be selected, Davidson Street between Fourth Avenue 80d the entrance to the parking structure would be redesigned to serve as a two-way street. Options to allow two-way traffic include acquisition of additional right-of-way on the south curb of Davidson Street, prohibition of parking on the south curb of Davidson Street and/or construction of raised islands to facilitate turns at this location. In addition, traffic related to the Police Headquarters would be directed toward Fourth Avenue through the use of signage or barriers to reduce impact on the neighborhood. As indicated earlier, selection of the Corporation Yard site could necessitate Woodlawn Avenue to be upgraded to a Class I Collector which would require that additional right of way along the project frontage to accommodate the wider roadway. An additional five feet of right of way would also be required on the north side of F Street adjacent to the site. A traffic signal at the intersection of Woodlawn Avenue and F Street would also be required. Selection of the Corporation Yard site would be less desirable from a traffic perspective due to the distance from the Civic Center Complex as well as the central part of the City. This separation would result in longer trips and more vehicle miles traveled on City streets. 18 ~ ' ~ ,"?-..... Standard parking ratios established by the City will be achieved on.the Civic Center Complex and each of the four Police Headquarters alternatives sites to assure adequate parking is available. Issues and Supporting Infonnation 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stonn water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected- demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient pennitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Potentially Significant Impact o o o o o o o Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated o o o o o o o Less Than Significant Impact o ~ o o o ~ ~ No Impact ~ o ~ ~ [g] o o Explanation: There will be no significant impacts to utilities and service systems as a result of the project. New service systems, or the substantial alteration of existing systems, would not be required for the expansion and remodeling of the Civic Center and construction of a Police Headquarters at one of the alternative locations. The sites are currently developed with urban level land uses and receive water and sewer through existing lines. There is sufficient supply/capacity available to serve the proposed project. However, one segment of the sewer 19 E I -33 syst¡;:m serving the project sit¡;: would fequire upgrading as its entire service area is builtout. More specifically, a pQrtion of the sewer line west of Bay Boulevard at G Street will need to be upgraded with a parallel line or expanded pipe diameter. This upgrad¡;: would be undertaken by the City as part of its Capital Improvements Program when required. Th¡;: amount of solid waste generated will not change significantly ov¡;:r that currently generated and there is sufficient landñll capacity available. . Issues and Supporting Information 17. MA.¡'IDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does th¡;: project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other CUITent projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant UnJess Mitigation Inco'1'orated No Impact Less Than Significant Impact D D D ~ D ~ D D D cg¡ D D Explanation: The expansion and remodeling of the Civic Cent¡;:r and construction and operation of a Police Headquarters at any of the four locations would not result in a significant impact to the adopted long-term environmental goals of the City of Chula Vista's General Plan and other adopted planning documents as those goals are related to biology and cultural resources. The sites are currently developed with urban level uses and do not contain identified biological Of cultural resources. The expansion and remodeling of the Civic Center and construction and operation of a Police Headquarters at any of the four locations would not result in a significant impact to th¡;: adopted long-term environmental goals of the City of Chula Vista's General Plan and other adopted planning documents. The project is infi11 development with urban level services in place. 20 EI -3tf The proposed project, in combination with three pending projects, could have a significant cumulative impact on traffic flow at the intersection of H Street and F ourth Avenue. However, construction of an additional southbound left-turn land on H Street would restore this intersection to an acceptable level of service. Noise and light from the proposed Police Headquarters could adversely impact adjacent residential areas by interfering with sleep activities. However, light fixture shielding and limitations on the use of police sirens would reduce these potential impacts on humans to below . a level of significance. ll.ENVTRONMENTALFACTORSPOTENnALLYAFFECTED Based on this environmental checklist, the environmental factors checked belów would be potentially affected by this project 0- o AgriOJlture Resources [8J Cultural Resources o HydrologylWater Quality ~ Noise o Air Quality o Biological Resources o GeologylSoils 1:81. Land UseJPlanning o Hazards & Hazardous Materials o Mineral Resources o PopulationIHoUSÛ'1g L8J Public Services IZI Reaeaticn ~TransportationITraffic o UblltieslService Systems o Mandatory Fmdings of Significance ill. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES The following project revisions or mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project and will be implemented during the design, construction and/or operation of the project MliigaJion Measure 1: Should the Friendship Park site be selected for the Police Headquarters, the following roadway improvements shall be incorporated into the plans: · Improve Davidson Street between Fourth Avenue and the entrance to the new facility to provide for two-way traffic; and · Install barriers at the entrance to the facility on Davidson S~t to discourage Police Headquarters traffic trom entering the neighborhood to the north. MiJigaJion Measure 2: Should the Corporation Yard site be selected for the Police Headquarters, the following roadway improvements shall be incorporated in the plans: · Provide, as necessary, additional right of way along project frontage on Woodlawn Avenue to accommodate Class I Collector; · Install traffic signal at F Street arid Woodland Avenue; and · Obtain an additional five feet of right of way along the north side of F Street adjacent to the site. 21 C"1_7c.- Miiigation Measure 3: Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Police Headquarters or Civic Center Complex, a noise study shall be completed by a qualified acoustician to demonstrate that the heating and ventilation equipment has been sufficiently screened to insure that noise levels at the adjacent residential property lines do not exceed standards set forth in Table III of the City's Noise Ordinance. Miiigalion Measure 4: The operations of the Police Headquarters shall be conditioned to require the following: · Police responding to emergency calls nom the Police Headquarters shall not operate sirens until they reach a major thoroughfare (e.g. Fourth Avenue or F Street); · Prisoners shall be loaded or unloaded in the underground parking garage; · Servicing of vehicles including testing sirens shall be prohibited; and · Outdoor public address systems shall be prohibited. Miiigation Measure 5: Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Police Headquarters, the City shall develop a "Good Neighbor Policy". This Policy shall include operational guidelines and associated educational program for police personnel intended to minimize potential conflicts with surrounding neighborhoods (e.g. screeching tire noise and radio noise from unattended police vehicles). In preparing this Policy, the City shall seek input nom the surrounding neighborhood. Mitigation Measure 6: Construction shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. on weekdays, and 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction shall occur on Sundays. Miiigation Measure 7: All outdoor light fixtures would be equipped with shields to avoid substantial spiIllight and/or glare onto adjacent residential areas. Miiigalion Measure 8: A qualified paleontologist shall monitor major excavation activities to determine if any important fossils could be adversely impacted. If important fossils could be impacted, the paleontologists shall devise and implement an appropriate salvage program. Mitigation Measure 9: Prior to issuance of a grading permit for a Police Headquarters on the Friendship Park site, the City shall identify a replacement site from Friendship Park within the same vicinity, and approve a plan which would create passive recreation opportunities within three years of the date the grading permit is issued. 22 E /-3& IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: D I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ~ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, hut at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated.· An ENVlRONMENi AL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remaio to be addressed. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. ;a A[Jb- BrianH~i~~ Planning and Environmental Manager Community Development City of ChuJa Vista (7-- '0- CO Date 23 £1-37 -- ~--,-_.._._----,-_._- z o ¡: < o o ..J W 0:: UJ 0:: w:¡; Il:~ <0 ::10 a 0:: Co.. < wo J:z w.... 00:: ::¡o 00.. o..W cO:: zC <z z< j~ o..¡¡:: 0::0 w.... ....- UJZ <0 :¡¡:¡¡ o::Z wo ....- z.... w< o~ o!:: -:¡¡ > õ ~ UJ :> j ::I J: o ~ u u " õO " '" >< ë u 5 ~ :;> == e "i Co.. e ~ _0 8.. =..c " ~ o.z¡ .šã ~ e rS~ ",e .2 Co ¡¡ .5 1i~ u :. "'1ii .!e .. ~ 11·5" j 0.:' Co .s-~.š .;¡.E:s "'u" 5 -5'- 'C A"3 ....Ci! ~~o ="¡::' :g&g i51i.5 t5x~ "'1::1 I c: ~ ã ~ 0 u ,,- þ1å-" ::::I'" ::I 1: atS :=0"13 >u ~"9o <'" i!.s ..c OS: oO:C 0 52 -=8'; 00. 0:':0 ~o _00 c- uo..-e 82:0 uuo '" := s....c ¡¡·õ E e-ã, ..ccS c:::lü u 8 " ¡¡~ J!oåJ! ~== .. u 0'" C:';:; ~ -.5 -åo"'l;jfftÜ£ .- - " ~ " " >oIlØUJ:lu åš~5~~ ~Ef!..ci~ e5-:;¡::æë EU~~~f! _-=~_o_ . . ~ " u " oil " '" >< ë u 5 ~ > " E 'i Co!! .Eo u_ .:! lIS õ.¡¡ 0. ~ u- .s ~ ~ E oS u > '" Q " ~ õ"" u e ~.~ " = .0:' ,,-0 - = ¡;;2 ." .... ;¡" .. >--â :.- " Q Co .2:¡; 0 i!""-S ª-] S 8 ~~ U " Q -5"e- :2 6- g g1i.s .cU" "':'" coo ~ CD § - ã g" ãiu =g ëa ~g g ~ ~~ ?' :J:û 'õ< "'1::1 cs·¡ _ ã _ 0 'â c ~05 ·c~ Ü 'cg ;;=6 ~ eo.._ c:o;.:cn °5 .g~ ~ ,. ($ ~ :a::>u'" ~V "ic:=;§ë; ~1i .. 0 C) q:: ~ i ~1 "ã0 en g. t3._ 0 ¡J., 8 IdÛ (,OJ :E ~ ui:uu "0 cOë;IE-o¡¡-3 :l4=1Ieâ O¡¡¡ ú' e-¡;â€ "'Otce-::sco ;¡;:õoœ5"iJe: eâu1ñ>.Eo ~a.ä.5<o;S . . . r=:'1_:?Ç/ ~ U co - .. .. ~ä5ã 'ë e e::; :::Ig.§~ ê- ~ - U._ U > >.~ o u c:: e uO",o. >< " ~ õ ;2: - o :. ,,>. -", r;.a ~'" 8>..sE~11~ :.:-g u~u·õ :. ;¡ 5 §.~ ~ ;z U'õ':; u U <II o rn._ C" U'I -.. ;Sõ~u'õg~ ... = 0 = c ;.-; OI#UO-O...... .... .. CQ'=~~ 0 .-::)( ~ -:l..c: ê"g-¡·';::fc- c.~ 5 =':=...... te:=>a>.o Q os ·-u- ocU =' "'a 0 II) = .5....crã;g.u :!2 8 os co II) ....- - = c c: c...c .Ëð>-·~8ãi~ .su.D.,gil·'Ëc 1+01- 11,,).- o ¡.~"'3 ~~:g..r:= ....t¡.-""'t:: 8....ø.<¡¡]~tS ¡¡Oe-S,,ªi:i_ ='~o q.¡uu =uUB:3.."~ -~ eft.l·~W'IIú .s~.8t;5¡¡-e~ 0" cUoosc: "''''a_ 0e..o..:::"'O- .!28ïd =-5'"2 ø::x::~.g..cêã1ñO N ,., -.._------,_._-_._.~.,,-_.-._.__.,-~-"_._.... ,,------_.._---....._-~------..__._._------- Z o ¡:: < u o ..J w œ: I/) œ: w:¡; ~~ <0 :Jo 0œ: ~11. wo J:Z w¡:: uœ: :]0 011. I1.w oœ: o 'Z ~ <0 ..JZ 11.- œ: œ:o w~ ~- I/)Z <0 :¡;:¡; œ:Z wO ~- Z~ w< u£! u!:: -:¡; > ë3 < ~ I/) > j :J J: U I '" ë .. E e '0 <> ~ ,__ '. ,c;- :. . .:.~~~. ::., c.!;o- :.- ~.,;; "~~:~ 8·E .,E! . GO' _.:ë~,. .,?~:;. ~ ~!~~'-jJ ~ ~. -, æ - .... <- ~~~ >< :~-'o;' "m.,;.¡;;- 'õ'5: ~-Ë.,~: "aÎ~ ~ð·rg <:" <§~.!ê -'<it.' I-'~ ctc:§; ·0., ~ s~- '"' , .,. - _.r ~. 0>0. -Co,;, o:·fJ - =::!: :. ..... I ,:e~~' " -' 0;- '. :~~ N¡f.., - :f~ .,~.. '.~~~. ~.~.~~ ~:;~:i 9 . "" I: ~: _-'. C" : z- j: ;::~~~ ';-';':.:::"; - ;¡~3 . -, .... -~-:L -'_ ~Ii-"':' '''--r-''----' . 0; " .2 ëoo " " a..- a o' ;:....: - " .- 0 ë\¿ u .c u.c¡,. " u :.=\U... æ 2 0 ~ ~u _oJ:: ê E - ~ .§§< ~~.c -"t: B.g 6 ~:~ 5 ë CIÔ ~8.~ E;:u ~g~ -_.c ~-a ~ :a-;;e ât.s a.1ã- ë ::I 0 .~ o t:r.,=~ .:! -g ë ~ æ~GSJ; -¡¡; .c ~ ~ u 1ã ~ <T -g U .. ;:COD " U .~ ..!:! 0 õ= ",,E " ".c .c- - !! ....- o " <T ~ !! as ~13 u " a.o 0'= u:a .c " f-- :3 . u -s " .c 0; .c ~ ~ " !! .¡;; OD .5 "<ã ¡;; .c ... ~ '" o QÐ Ë "04;;.5 B o Q.O"O 1ft ~; ~ ~ s: ÞÐ.=: ~ u~1! ~ .0._ u ""0 -~~""O~ ~~~ã:g C 0 .~ ::I e e ~] 0- !! OO"ü:ë ::; Q u·-::a.g 'ë-g~25 Q..::scn 0.0 .S -0 " -g o "2 ~ . . ... " :E u u .~ Õ '" x :~ õ ...'" 0-0 ~ M u 0 .- a. > 0 u ~ "'''' -ci .!! :E :E e a. u .c ~~~ §~.~.5£ ø... .~.g ~ c:: "ëñ § uu·-U....eÆ<t: .;:z 6'oc..ÿ';.~_ ... -go¡¡ 8iE co-5 8- oo===.5>c ~ooo0..c .- .== .~ o.~ ~ 8~ Eø:I¡;.š.-~~~ :i go g- E'~ ~ 0.= Cßüoei3oå"'5~ c>"Ooo- ."'C\\I'I ~ ~ ~ 12 &~ 5 Þ =;:¡¡.5~ -a~i:J . -=..==cdOO = 0"'" \\I'I",scNO:2.r::g as~..c o-E.c -.c \0.0 .~- en '= _ ð e .. 1-0 °u~Bc...Qo~.,g u o:::.g·Ë~<l::~.r:: g-s£u ·õ~~~ ~ui.!!!-goc·õ.!!!C =r a-=-¿;- ~c.s ~ .- '5 ¡..... 'ü .- 0 00'- S :2:' £-g~:a.s-g ... C'" >. :: "0 :::s e :a := o"'C U 1: 0 c.. 0 1:~=-o.9t:~ut: o..::t:~ã.Eaãa.~ . ~ t::" =,< 0; .¡¡ 16 o OD " :§ ';; '" x ,: .g u u Co ~ .s J!> .,. " r- " o " " È ~ .vi ~ c..~ u ~-o .c -0 " ~ã~ g . = ..c:~~ ,," " -soo8 0-0 0 -ã-c; 2 !!:~ 'ë.g ã =-ät~ .8~Ë ~ " ,: ]~8 ~ e 0 = c::i.Z 1: t'"-- ui ""Q '" 2 " .. t:icd"E § È ~ UøÎø '" -¡¡; .¡¡ 16 o OD " ~ ';; '" -'" " " .c U :ä ö: -s 0 '~ § -g~ f5:õå .- ~ ~ 0 g-;, o :ä .c_ .c "Q,~ -;- o at: '6. ~ '"- 2 .~ H::i Iô:;¡~ .c .. .š:a:!! ,~"'C ë :~:2 o .. :¡ -E 9 ... :::s CII ë Q:E 8 u .. <~~ r- -.> .,. ·0·0'. .Q,;'(J '" .'"' . - ~ u _00 -" " l;-";;¡j '2 Ë g::E =C.ë~ E..2~u E ~.;;,~ o u e uC··':::J.. .... e" 'C,c: " . co " " ~ c .. . o x N '" '" ~~ ëë o e ü~ €~ ".: > ~ - ....-'"""0 o c.- c ';;' ~ 1i cd EccE;u c.. .~ .... E:: ¡; 0-="'"0 .~ >,'S_ c c ë.. ëd o . -.r:: ~ e -=~~ ::::t-~~ - U .~ 12 cd ""':Ì COCo ~-¡:£.9o" t: U _ eLl to) ¡::; = «I en 'U 5:- 0 Z; '~'O.5~ = Õ S ~ o.~ ¡: ~ ~'C 3~~-..g- ]:=; æ -g c.. ':: .0 Ü C. U.c «I cØ is as '0 Co ¡¡ tt:c:;,§- _oou5 ~ d U..Q E CT~~:E.!! u WI :::s Co <~.s8.ª '. . . f;" ·CO~ -! 0- ....- . Z·' o .;~-~.:. Q. ~ Z o ¡:: < o o ...J W c::: en c::: W:¡¡ Ii::~ <C) ::JO CJc::: CD.. < WC) :I:Z W- oil: :JO Oil. Il.W ca: ZO z 0:( <:) .JZ Il.- a: a:0 WI- 1-- cnZ <0 :¡¡:¡¡ a:Z wO 1-- ZI- W< 0S2 o!:: -:¡¡ > ü ~ en :> < ...J ::J :I: Co) .!! c-.:; ... E' E Q': <J .. =:.1:t';5 ,0,',0., "J,~'u; ::~rI1: :t~ ~t;~; -e; ,~'- ::' 0..· :F;" .è:.:." .oc' ë..'" di'~' ~~~ ::!i ';z,¡. ".J~;: ~;~'~ ::~&H; <r." c·ò ~~;~t ei! .", c œ ~ "- ....c o 0 - .- 0- _ œ u u " - _ u .- " Qc< "" x ·ü c; § .2 0- U'=: Ò,¡ .- " Uc< 8::¡;.5 0 IJ =..r::..=ëi:í-S o en.::: ~ '- Q.. è 3: u 0 cuû~:g5 1..0 0 ~ 0 II,) ..e .c: ¡¡s: >. - .9-..c g .::: ü-S;"!: 1: Ê'¡¡¡'j!,c- U 4)::C: c c..~.¡: ;¡~ oo~ tt. ë.'~ .5c.Ecu -d "0-- 0 U ~ U ~ -s; cl:: > ':: ::: QO"t;I 0'- II) 5.~a.§·~ I'CI"C fA go t:.~ "S ¡:¡., E"O 8..= uoc:c.E s-5fil'G°U c=u~gc.. ~ o.!!"ã·:: ~ ~ ~ g.·ü ~ :.a .- u ... '> 1:1 e o5l'11u~OQ -:::I¿;.Eucu a.g-·==·~-5 o¡: :I 5 u ~ ~ ~:I::g-5 s..~ '" c: / _ ¿/f""'"