Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1999/07/27 "I dM"" IInder penalty of perjury that I am em~lo"e~ bv t:,e City of Chura Vista in the Q,ce '.. - ¡ :.' Clerk and that I posted AGENDA t·. :ì" .Ayn ,,¡, ,. ~ en the Bulletin Board at <h, "d, ~.. ''''''e, ,e' " CO" ,., '" July 27,1999 DATED. . SIGNED 6:00 p.m. " CALL TO ORDER 1/ z 'If' L ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas, and Mayor Horton, 2, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE 3, AFPROV AL OF MINUTES: None submitted, 4, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY A Oath of Office: William A Hall - Economic Development Commission, B, Presentation of checks by Mayor Horton to: (I) Chula Vista High SchoollKen Lee Scholarship Fund; accepting will be Principal Larry Perondi); and (2) Sharp Health Care Foundation/Ken Lee Memorial Fund; accepting will be Britt Berrett, CEO, and Mary Ellington, Service Line Director for Orthopedics and Neurology for Sharp Hospital, C Awarding of Kentucky Colonel commission to Dr, G. Gordon Browning. Presenting the commission will be Councilmember Patty Davis. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 9) The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that the item be removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A Letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in Closed Session on July 20, 1999, there were no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. Staff recommendation: The letter be received and filed. 6. ORDINANCE 2793, AMENDING SECTION 19.58.147 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REQUIRED ST ANDARDS FOR LARGE F AMIL Y DAY CARE HOMES (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) Agenda 2 July 27, 1999 The Planning and Building Department was requested by the Economic Development Commission to re-evaluate the Large Family Day Care Homes ordinance in anticipation of a critical surge in demand resulting from the Welfare Reform Legislation. The Needs Assessment Committee of the San Diego County Child Care Planning Council has identified the City as a "high needs community" in the South Bay area. The biggest need identified was care for infants and after school care for school-age children. Staff recommendation: Council place the ordinance on second reading for adoption. (Director of Planning and Building) 7. RESOLUTION 19545, APPROVING AGREEMENTS WITH VARIOUS COMMUNITY PROMOTIONS GROUPS FOR EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS The 1999/2000 budget includes the funding of various community promotions organizations. Council considered requests from these groups and, as part of the adoption of the budget on June 29, 1999, the following amounts for funding were approved: Miss Chula Vista Pageant, $2,000; Gretchen Evans Library Concerts, $1,650; U.N. Day Committee, $350; and Bonitafest, $2,410. Agreements have been prepared with each of these agencies setting out the terms and conditions for receiving City funding. Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (City Manager) 8. RESOLUTION 19546, SUPPORTING THE ABANDONMENT OF THE CORONADO BRANCH RAIL ALONG THE CHULA VISTA BA YFRONT AND DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK WITH MTDB, THE PORT DISTRICT AND OTHER AGENCIES TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABANDONMENT The City and the Port of San Diego are engaged in significant redevelopment efforts on the Chula Vista Bayfront. The Coronado Branch bisects all of the properties, impeding the development of these properties as well as pedestrian and vehicular access to the Bayfront. The line has had limited use during the past several decades, and has fallen into disrepair, Staff is pursuing removing this blighting influence to promote the redevelopment of the Bayftont and enhance public access to the waterfront area. Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Community Development) 9. RESOLUTION 19547, ADOPTING A REVISED CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NUMBER 478-03, ALL-WAY STOP At a past meeting, Council directed that staff and the Safety Commission review the current system of warrant criteria for stop signs or other traffic controls and examine a more flexible, hybrid approach. As part of this past discussion on neighborhood traffic controls, staff had reported that numerous requests for all-way stops along East "J" Street had been investigated but none of the locations met the Council Policy on All-Way Stops currently in use. Council directed staff to review the current system of warrants and return with a revised policy. Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works) -- Agenda 3 July 27, 1999 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak to any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 10. PUBLIC HEARING ON WAIVING IRREGULARITIES IN THE BID OF KNOX ELECTRIC, INC. FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL EMERGENCY VEIDCLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM ALONG FOURTH A VENUE CORRIDOR IN THE CITY RESOLUTION 19548, MAKING A SPECIFIC FINDING THAT IRREGULARITIES IN THE BID OF KNOX ELECTRIC, INC. ARE WAIVED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC; ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO KNOX ELECTRIC, INC. FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL EMERGENCY VEIDCLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM ALONG FOURTH AVENUE CORRIDOR IN THE CITY; AND TRANSFERRING $40,000 IN REMAINING TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE COMPLETED BROADWAY AND FLOWER STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL CIP FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED) On June 23, 1999, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids from five electrical contractors for the installation of the Traffic Signal Emergency Vehicle Preemption System along Fourth Avenue corridor, A low bid of$118,605 was received from Knox Electric, Inc. This bid contained some minor irregularities which are insubstantial in nature and which do not affect the bid price. Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works) II, PUBLIC HEARING DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 94-1 RESOLUTION 19549, ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS OR THE REAPPORTIONMENT IN THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS #90-3 AND #94-1 The City previously formed Assessment Districts Numbers 90-3 and 94-1 to finance infrastructure benefitting the developing properties within the EastLake Trails project. The method of apportioning the original assessments reflected the land use entitlements then applicable to the properties within each respective assessment district. The EastLake Company has asked the City to approve certain changes and modifications in and/or reallocations of the existing assessments within these two assessment districts to correspond to the development reflected in the final map for the Trails South project and those other land use approvals for the EastLake Trails North and the EastLake Vistas approved by the City since the formation of the assessment districts. Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works) - - Agenda 4 July 27, 1999 12. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FORMATION OF THE TOWN CENTRE AND BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION 19550, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE A(I) RESOLUTION 19551, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION AND ABANDONING THE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT B. RESOLUTION 19552, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE B.(I) RESOLUTION 19553, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION AND ABANDONING THE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT The Town Centre and Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts were originally formed over 15 years ago, and Council has annually undertaken proceedings to levy assessments to finance the maintenance of improvements within each District. In accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California, enacted by the approval of Proposition 218, Council adopted Resolution 19489 on June 8, 1999. Staff recommendation: Council open the public hearing, take testimony, close the public hearing, direct staff to tally all ballots, and adopt the resolutions approving the formation of the Town Centre and/or Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts, based on the results of the ballot tabulation. (Director of Public Works) ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the public. The items will be considered individually by the Council, and staff recommendations may, in certain cases, be presented in the alternative. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak "form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Agenda 5 July 27, 1999 13. RESOLUTION 19554, WAIVING THE CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS, APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH DKS ASSOCIATES FOR AN ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM (CIP-TF237), PHASE 2, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT The City has received State approval to utilize Federal funds under the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act, Congestion Mitigation Air Quality program, to upgrade the City's traffic control system to a state-of-the-art, flexible timing Adaptive Traffic Control system. The first phase ofa three-phase project was awarded to DKS Associates on November 14,1999. DKS Associates has now essentially completed Phase I ofthe project, and the City is prepared to move forward with Phase 2. The contract with DKS has a provision that the City can, at its option, extend the contract to cover Phase 2. Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works) ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR OTHER BUSINESS 14. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS A. Scheduling of meetings. 15. MAYOR'S REPORTS A. Ratification of appointments: Economic Develooment Commission (Ex-Officio) - Linda Baughman (to fill vacancy created by Commissioner Boruta, whose term expired June 30, 1999); Human Relations Commission - Michael Palomo (to fill vacancy created by Commissioner Aguilar, whose term expires June 30, 2003); International Friendshio Commission - Arturo Herrera (to fill vacancy created by Commissioner Wood, whose term expires June 30, 2000); Veterans Advisorv Commission - A. Y. Casillas (to fill vacancy created by Commissioner Anderson, whose term expires June 30, 2000 16. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT to a Closed Session and thence to the Regular Meeting of August 3, 1999, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. *** An Adjourned Meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council meeting.*** ---------------- ". declare IInder pênalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Chula Vista in the Office of the City Clerk and that I posted this Agenda/Notice on tha Bullatin Board at Tuesday, July 27, 1999 the Public ~Vi~ Building..¡,. _ at 'm~ . ...11 on 6:00 p.m. OATED. ? "} SIGNED ð~ ~" Council Chambers Public Services Building (immediately following the City Council Meeting) CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION AGENDA Effective April I, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. Unless the City Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are permitted by law to be the subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the interests of the City. The Council is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports offina) action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session, reports of final action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 428 "F" Street, Chula Vista, California 91910. Assessor's Parcel Number 568-181-34,35,36,37 (portion), 41 (portion). Negotiating Parties: Security Trust Company and City ofChula Vista (Sid Morris). Under Negotiations: Property Acquisition .... ~ ~ ft.. =.£t~_: ~~~~ CllY OF CHUIA VISTA OFFICE OFTHE CITY ATTORNEY Date: July 21, 1999 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: John M. Kaheny, City Attorney~ Re: Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session for the Meeting of 7/20/99 The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista did not met in Closed Session on 7/20/99. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista met in Closed Session on 7/20/99 to discuss: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING: - Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b): Four cases. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8: Property: 428 "F Street, Chula vista, California 91910. Assessor's Parcel Number 568-181- 34, 35, 36, 37 (portion) , 41 (portion) Negotiating Parties: Security Trust Company and City of Chula vista (Sid Morris) Under Negotiation: Property Acquisition The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the City Attorney participated, that there were no reportable actions which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. JMK: 19k ", \t"",e\)""·.,,,.\¡t\",o..~.. ."0 5 IJ-j 276 FOURTH AVENUE· CHULA VISTA· CALIFORNIA 91910· (619) 691-5037. FAX (619) 409-5823 @Poa1-C"".umo,Recyel.dP_, --------- - --_..._-----~---_._....--._,- -- - - ~-----_..._.~.__.__._.,--_.--._--_._._--_._---,-_.._-_.-_.__._----~- July21,1999 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council ~ FROM: David D. Rowlands, Jr., City Manag~~ / SUBJECT: City Council Meeting of July 27,1999 This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting of Tuesday, July 27,1999. Comments regarding the Written Communications are as follows: 5a. This is a letter from the City Attorney stating that, to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in Closed Session on July 20, 1999, there were no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED. DDR:mab - ORDINANCE NO. 2793 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL AMENDING SECTION 19.58.147 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REQUIRED STANDARDS FOR LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES WHEREAS, the City has initiated a proposal to amend the Municipal Code Section 19.58.147 relating to Large Family Daycare specifically, to change the notice requirement from 300 to 100 feet, eliminate the 1200 square foot play area, and to eliminate the potential requirement of a block wall to attenuate noise; and WHEREAS, the current Zoning Ordinance standards for large family daycare facilities regarding block wall, play area and noticing will be brought into conformance with State regulations by approval of this amendment; and WHEREAS, the City proposes creating policies and application procedures to streamline the current large family daycare process; and WHEREAS, this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, will be compatible with the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has concluded that this proposal as a procedural amendment, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under the General Rule exemption Section 15061 (b)(3). WHEREAS, on April 14, 1999, the City Planning Commission voted 7-0 recommending that the City Council approve the Zoning Code text amendment to Section 19.58.147 in accordance with Resolution No. PCA-99-01 ;and WHEREAS, the City Clerk set time and place for a hearing on said Municipal Code Amendment application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in, the Star-News, a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely July 20, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and ordain as follows: SECTION I: That Section 19.58.147 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: A large family daycare home shall be allowed in the R-E and R-1 zones, and within the PC designated RE and RS zones, upon the issuance of large family daycare permit by the zoning administrator and in compliance with the following standards: 10 -I Ordinance 2793 Page 2 -- A. Notice shall be given to properties within 300 feet of the proposed large family daycare home at least ten days prior to consideration of the permit. 1. The permit shall be considered without public hearing unless a hearing is requested by the applicant or other affected party by the hearing deadline date. The applicant or other affected party may 13ppeal the zoning administrator's decision to the planning commission. 2. The family daycare function shall be incidental to the residential use of the property. 3. A large family daycare home shall not locate within: 4. Three hundred feet of another such facility with said measurement being defined as the shortest distance between the property lines of any such facilities; and 5. Twelve hundred feet of another such facility along the same street with said measurements being defined as the shortest distance between front property lines, as measured along the same street, of any such facilities. B. The owner must provide a double-wide driveway which shall be paved to meet City standards and be a minimum of sixteen-feet wide and ninteen-feet in depth as measured from the edge of sidewalk to any vertical obstruction. The driveway shall be available during all hours of operation for the loading and unloading of children. If a garage exists on-site, it must be utilized for parking of personal vehicle(s}. In the event that less than a two-car garage exists on-site, the owner must designate an area on-site other than on the driveway so that a total of two personal vehicles can be parked on-site, including the garage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applicant must comply with all other Municipal Code provisions as to parking and traffic. 1. If in the opinion of the zoning administrator there is a potential for significant traffic problems, the zoning administrator shall request review of the application by the city traffic engineer. The city traffic engineer may impose accessory requirements for the daycare permit in these instances to insure maintenance of traffic safety levels within the vicinity of the home. 2. Outdoor play activity shall not be allowed in the front or exterior side yards of the home. 3. Play areas shall be designed and located to reduce the impact of noise on surrounding properties. 4. A business license will be obtained concurrently with the use permit. 5. At the City's discretion, an annual review of the permit may be done to determine compliance with the permit's conditions of approval and state and City requirements. 10-;;9- - Ordinance 2793 Page 3 SECTION II: FINDINGS The City Council hereby finds that the text amendment will enhance the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Chula Vista, will bring the City Municipal Code in conformance with State law and is consistent with the General Plan and is supported by public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. SECTION III: EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and its second reading and adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by O-/"-..~~ ~ Robert A. Leiter John M. Kaheny Planning and Building Director City Attorney h/3 -- --~----_..---_.- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 2- Meeting Date 7/27/99 ITEM TITLE: Resolution ,rsif5- Approving agreements between the City of Chula Vista and various commnnity promotions gronps for expenditure of City funds Agreement with Miss Chula Vista Pageant Agreement with Gretchen Evans (Library Concerts) Agreement with U. N. Day Committee Agreement with Bonita~ SUBMITTED BY: City Manager~~ ...A' 4/5 Vote: Yes_ No X The 1999-00 budget includes the funding of various community promotions organizations. The Council considered requests from these groups and, as part of the adoption of the budget on June 29, 1999, the following amounts for funding were approved: · Miss Chula Vista Pageant $2,000 · Gretchen Evans Library Concerts $1,650 · U. N. Day Committee $ 350 · Bonitafest $2,410 Agreements have been prepared between the City and each of these agencies setting out the terms and conditions for receiving City funding. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving agreements with community promotions organizations for the expenditure of funds. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N.A. DISCUSSION: As discussed in the budget, the City Council has always been very supportive of community promotions activities and funding has remained fairly constant over the years. The amounts approved for FY 1999-00 are the same as in the past several years. In order for the organizations to receive their funding, the attached agreements need to be executed. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding in the amounts shown above is included in the 1999-00 Community Promotions activity to support the above events. 1/ I v RESOLUTION NO. ,1545' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND VARIOUS COMMUNITY PROMOTIONS GROUPS FOR EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the 1999-00 budget includes funding of various Community Promotions organizations; and WHEREAS, the Council considered requests from these groups during the budget sessions and approved funding in the following amounts: · Miss Chula Vista Pageant $2,000 · Gretchen Evans Library Concerts $1,650 · U. N. Day Committee $ 350 · Bonitafest $2,410 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve agreements in a form approved by the city Attorney between the City of Chula Vista and Miss Chula Vista Pageant, Gretchen Evans Library Concerts, U. N. Day Committee and Bonitafest Committee, copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreements for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by David D. Rowlands, Jr. M. Kaheny city Manager Attorney H:\home\lorraine\rs\comproms r¡ - d-' AGREEMENT SETTING OUT THE TERMS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE MISS CHULA VISTA PAGEANT IN REGARD TO THE EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS APPROPRIATED THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day of , 1999 by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" , and the MISS CHULA VISTA PAGEANT, ~J;1'!'!:.!i1.ª--ª-.!i11'RJ. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chu1a vista has determined that the function of , the Miss Chu1a Vista Pageant serves a valid public purpose, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista desires to encourage the beneficial aims of the Miss Chula vista Pageant through appropriation of reasonable amounts of City funds, and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a policy for consideration of requests fo~ funding by private organizations and individuals, and WHEREAS, such policy stipulates that no expenditure may be made out of any appropriation awarded said organization unless an agreement has been reached between the parties setting out the terms and conditions for the expenditure of such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows. 1- The Miss Chula vista Pageant agrees to sponsor the "Miss Chula vista" Contest. 2. City agrees to contribute $2,000 toward the cost of sponsoring the event. 3. The Miss Chula vista Pageant agree to expend City appropriated funds to meet bona fide obligations incurred in performing services related to the "Miss Chula vista" Contest in fiscal year 99-00. 4. The Miss Chula vista Pageant agrees to submit, on a yearly basis, a complete report of all expenditures and shall specifically list the purposes furthered by the City appropriated funds of $2,000 for fiscal year 99-00. 1 r¡ -?) ---- ..~_._--~-----_....- 5. That the Council of the City of Chula Vista at its discretion may require the Miss Chula vista Pageant to provide or allow the City to undertake a complete financial audit of their records. 6. That the term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year, from 7-1-99 through 6-30-00, unless further modified to include other permitted expenditures of funds that are appropriated by the City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day. and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MISS CHULA VISTA PAGEANT Mayor of the City of Chula Vista 7<?~ Chairman . ATTEST City Clerk Approved as to form by 2 1-1/ --"',','. ·----"._-- ------------ AGREEMENT SETTING OUT THE TERMS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE MISS CHULA VISTA PAGEANT IN REGARD TO THE EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS APPROPRIATED THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day of , 1999 by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as ßCityß, and the MISS CHULA VISTA PAGEANT, !!XT~!:1i!.ªªJ.Tª.!. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has determined that the function of. the Miss Chula Vista Pageant serves a valid public purpose, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista desires to encourage the beneficial aims of the Miss Chula vista Pageant through appropriation of reasonable amounts of City funds, and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a policy for consideration of requests fo~ funding by private organizations and individuals, and WHEREAS, such policy stipulates that no expenditure may be made out of any appropriation awarded said organization unless an agreement has been reached between the parties setting out the terms and conditions for the expenditure of such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. The Miss Chula Vista Pageant agrees to sponsor the "Miss Chula vistaß Contest. 2. City agrees to contribute $2,000 toward the cost of sponsoring the event. 3. The Miss Chula vista Pageant agree to expend City appropriated funds to meet bona fide obligations incurred in performing services related to the ßMiss Chula Vistaß Contest in fiscal year 99-00. 4. The Miss Chula vista Pageant agrees to submit, on a yearly basis, a complete report of all expenditures and shall specifically list the purposes furthered by the City appropriated funds of $2,000 for fiscal year 99-00. 1 1-5 .~ _....____M._..__~ 5. That the Council of the City of Chula Vista at its discretion may require the Miss Chula Vista Pageant to provide or allow the City to undertake a complete financial audit of their records. 6. That the term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year, from 7-1-99 through 6-30-00, unless further modified to include other permitted expenditures of funds that are appropriated by the City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MISS CHULA VISTA PAGEANT Mayor of the City of Chula vista 9-'~ ~ Chairman . l ATTEST City Clerk Approved as to form by c<~~ 0 0 H:\Öome\lorraine\ag\miss.cv 2 r¡-~ -----~- ...--..,.--,,-.--...--... AGREEMENT SETTING OUT THE TERMS AND OBLIGATIONS OF GRETCHEN EVANS LIBRARY CONCERTS IN REGARD TO THE EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS APPROPRIATED THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day of 1999, by and between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and GRETCHEN EVANS LIBRARY CONCERTS, hereinafter referred to as "Gretchen Evans", ~!!!'!:~ªª~!R.!. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula vista has determined that the function of-the Gretchen Evans Library Concerts serves a valid public purpose, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula vista desires to encourage the beneficial aims of the Gretchen Evans Library Concerts through appropriation of reasonable amounts of City funds, and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a policy for consideration of requests fo~ funding by private organizations and individuals, and WHEREAS, such policy stipulates that no expenditure may be made of any appropriation awarded said organization unless an agreement has been reached between the parties setting out the terms and conditions for the expenditure of such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1- Gretchen Evans agrees to provide a total of six library concerts, three in the fall and three in the spring of a type and caliber which meet with the advance approval of the City Manager or his designee. For these six concerts, the City will appropriate and expend $1,650.00 for same during the 1999-00 fiscal year. 2. Gretchen Evans agrees to expend City appropriated funds to meet bona fide obligations incurred in performing services related to the library concerts. 3. Gretchen Evans agrees to submit, on a yearly basis, a complete report of all expenditures and shall specifically list the purposes furthered by the City appropriated funds of $1,650 for fiscal year 1999-00. 4. That the Council of the City of Chula Vista, at its discretion, may require Gretchen Evans to provide or allow the City to undertake a complete financial audit of her records. 1 1--1 __ ____..__.__.u._.,··~ 5. That the term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year, from· 7-1-99 through 6-30-00, unless further modified to include other permitted expenditures of funds that are appropriated by the City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA GRETCHEN EVANS LIBRARY CONCERTS ~2;?L ~ Mayor of the City of Chula vista Gr tchen Evans ATTEST City Clerk Approved as to form by . f)&."'~P Ci t t torney V H:\horne\lorraine\ag\GrtBvans 2 1-g - -- --.-- AGREEMENT SETTING OUT THE TERMS AND OBLIGATIONS OF GRETCHEN EVANS LIBRARY CONCERTS IN REGARD TO THE EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS APPROPRIATED THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day of 1999, by and between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and GRETCHEN EVANS LIBRARY .CONCERTS, hereinafter referred to as "Gretchen Evans", !'1:J;~!!,gªª,g~ªJ. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has determined that the function of. the Gretchen Evans Library Concerts serves a valid public purpose, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista desires to encourage the beneficial aims of the Gretchen Evans Library Concerts through appropriation of reasonable amounts of City funds, and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a policy for consideration of requests fo~ funding by private organizations and individuals, and WHEREAS, such policy stipulates that no expenditure may be made of any appropriation awarded said organization unless an agreement has been reached between the parties setting out the terms and conditions for the expenditure of such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Gretchen Evans agrees to provide a total of six library concerts, three in the fall and three in the spring of a type and caliber which meet with the advance approval of the City Manager or his designee. For these six concerts, the City will appropriate and expend $1,650.00 for same during the 1999-00 fiscal year. 2. Gretchen Evans agrees to expend City appropriated funds to meet bona fide obligations incurred in performing services related to the library concerts. 3. Gretchen Evans agrees to submit, on a yearly basis, a complete report of all expenditures and shall specifically list the purposes furthered by the City appropriated funds of $1,650 for fiscal year 1999-00. 4. That the Council of the City of Chula Vista, at its discretion, may require Gretchen Evans to provide or allow the City to undertake a complete financial audit of her records. 1 1-1 ---"_..- __On ." .__,_~__.__.__. 5. That the term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year, from 7-1-99 through 6-30-00, unless further modified to include other permitted expenditures of funds that are appropriated by the City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA GRETCHEN EVANS LIBRARY CONCERTS ~£~hY c;;- ¿~ Mayor of the City of Chula vista Gr tchen Evans ATTEST City Clerk Approved as to form by . QL./v--e_C/ &J C~ttorney H:\hame\lorraine\ag\GrtEvans 2 7-/0 --~~-~"-'-'----"~'--'...._- AGREEMENT SETTING OUT THE TERMS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNITED NATIONS DAY COMMITTEE IN REGARD TO THE EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS APPROPRIATED THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1999 by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" , and the UNITED NATIONS DAY COMMITTEE, hereinafter referred to as "Committee", !:'i:!:t'~~ªª~:t'ª..!. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula vista has determined that the designation of a United Nations Day Committee serves a valid public purpose, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista desires to encourage the beneficial aims of the United Nations Day Committee through appropniation of reasonable amounts of City funds, and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a policy for consideration of requests for funding by private organizations and individuals, and WHEREAS, such policy stipulates that no expenditure may be made out of any appropriation awarded said organizations unless an agreement has been reached between the parties setting out the terms and conditions for the expenditure of such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1- The United Nations Day Committee agrees to promote friendly relations between all members of different nations who come to Chula Vista, in exchange for which City will pay $350. 2. That the United Nations Day Committee agrees to expend City appropriated funds to meet bona fide obligations incurred in performing services related to the United Nations Day Program, not to exceed $350 for fiscal year 99-00. 3. The Committee agrees to submit, on a yearly basis, a complete report of all expenditures and shall specifically list the purposes furthered by the City appropriated funds of $350 for fiscal year 99-00. 1 7-/1 ---.---,--' ---.- -"--"-----"-- 4. That the Council of the City of Chula vista at its discretion may require the United Nations Day Committee to provide or allow the City to undertake a complete financial audit of their records. 5. That the term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year, from 7-1-99 through 6-30-00, unless further modified to include other permitted expenditures of funds that are appropriated by the City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA UNITED NATIONS DAY COMMITTEE Mayor of the City of Chula Vista ATTEST , City Clerk Approved as to form by C)reÂI:j g 0 Ci~Attorney H:\hame\lorraine\ag\UNdayCom 2 1- /;)- ~.. -.. - -- ----- AGREEMENT SETTING OUT THE TERMS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNITED NATIONS DAY COMMITTEE IN REGARD TO THE EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS APPROPRIATED THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1999 by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as nCityn, and the UNITED NATIONS DAY COMMITTEE, hereinafter referred to as nCommitteen, ~!';J;'!f!ªª!';J;'R.!. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has determined that the designation of a United Nations Day Committee serves a valid public purpose, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista desires to encourage the beneficial aims of the United Nations Day Committee through appropciation of reasonable amounts of City funds, and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a policy for consideration of requests for funding by private organizations and individuals, and WHEREAS, such policy stipulates that no expenditure may be made out of any appropriation awarded said organizations unless an agreement has been reached between the parties setting out the terms and conditions for the expenditure of such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. The united Nations Day Committee agrees to promote friendly relations between all members of different nations who come to Chula Vista, in exchange for which City will pay $350. 2. That the United Nations Day Committee agrees to expend City appropriated funds to meet bona fide obligations incurred in performing services related to the United Nations Day Program, not to exceed $350 for fiscal year 99-00. 3. The Committee agrees to submit, on a yearly basis, a complete report of all expenditures and shall specifically list the purposes furthered by the City appropriated funds of $350 for fiscal year 99-00. 1 1-/3 - 4. That the Council of the City of Chula Vista at its discretion may require the United Nations Day Committee to . provide or allow the City to undertake a complete financial audit of their records. 5. That the term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year, from 7-1-99 through 6-30-00, unless further modified to include other permitted expenditures of funds that are appropriated by the City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caùsed this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA UNITED NATIONS DAY COMMITTEE Mayor of the City of Chula Vista .)y~!~~ ATTEST , City Clerk Approved as to form by 2 1-/1 --'-- - "-...-,.-.""'.- AGREEMENT SETTING OUT THE TERMS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE BONITAFEST COMMITTEE IN REGARD TO THE EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS APPROPRIATED THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1999 by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as nCityn, and the BONITAFEST COMMITTEE, hereinafter referred to as nBonitafestn, ~J;±!!~ªª~±!!.!. WHEREAS, the City Council of tbe City of Chula Vista has determined that support of the Bonitafest serves a valid public purpose, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista desires to encourage the beneficial aims of the Bonitafest Committee through appropriation of reasonable amounts of City funds, and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a policy for consideration of requests fo~ funding by private organizations and individuals, and WHEREAS, such policy stipulates that no expenditure may be made out of any appropriation awarded said organizations unless an agreement has been reached between the parties setting out the terms and conditions for the expenditure of such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows. 1- In the event the Bonitafest Committee conducts the annual Bonitafest Festival, the City will provide $2,410 in police and transit services to the Festival without charge and the City will waive the special event business license tax for this event. 2. That the Council of the City of Chula Vista at its discretion may require the Bonitafest Committee to provide or allow the City to undertake a complete financial audit of their records. 3. That the term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year, from 7-1-99 through 6-30-00, unless further modified to include other permitted expenditures of funds that are appropriated by the City Council. 1 1-/5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA BONITAFEST COMMITTEE Mayor of the City of Chula vista ¿rJ~" ¿L~ Chairman ATTEST City Clerk Approved as to form by ~À ,<...-<' c/ City rney , H:\hame\lorraine\AG\BONTAFST 2 1--/~ -- AGREEMENT SETTING OUT THE TERMS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE BONITAFEST COMMITTEE IN REGARD TO THE EXPENDITURE OF CITY FUNDS APPROPRIATED THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1999 by and between the CITY OF CKULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" , and the BONITAFEST COMMITTEE, hereinafter referred to as "Bonitafest", !'L!1:!i!!!lââ!!l1:R.!. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has determined that support of the Bonitafest serves a valid public purpose, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista desires to encourage the beneficial aims of the Bonitafest Committee through appropriation of reasonable amounts of City funds, and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a policy for consideration of requests foÞ funding by private organizations and individuals, and WHEREAS, such policy stipulates that no expenditure may be made out of any appropriation awarded said organizations unless an agreement has been reached between the parties setting out the terms and conditions for the expenditure of such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1- In the event the Bonitafest Committee conducts the annual Bonitafest Festival, the City will provide $2,410 in police and transit services to the Festival without charge and the City will waive the special event business license tax for this event. 2. That the Council of the City of Chula Vista at its discretion may require the Bonitafest Committee to provide or allow the City to undertake a complete financial audit of their records. 3. That the term of this agreement shall be for a period of one (I) year, from 7-1-99 through 6-30-00, unless further modified to include other permitted expenditures of funds that are appropriated by the City Council. 1 1-/1 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA BONITAFEST COMMITTEE Jfj,c.i. Ú Ad, A. J ().~ Mayor of the City of Chula vista Chairman ATTEST City Clerk Approved as to form by . H:\home\lorraine\AG\BONTAFST 2 1-/~ ~ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM No. -L-. MEETING DATE 07-27-99 ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION /'15'16 SUPPORTING THE ABANDONMENT OF THE CORONADO BRANCH RAIL ALONG THE CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT AND DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK WITH MTDB, THE PORT DISTRICT AND OTHER AGENCIES TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABANDONMENT SU.M~ ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN~TD" (S, ;~= ..CITY M~G~' ~ ~~"".'::~~~_~~ ~' .... 1Yi /~]1¡h"/\1jLd'\" 1 III'''' mi11m-Wiliii"\ I'~ ).11'\_: '1 '/b1, 1~~~*' IX¡~;'1E "9i§~Nd;'m"S11h'",mL1f¡{!W1},L,",,"111\ 1,\\ ¡j¡" _ 1 "'* ,'''**!Ji1tÚf;œ]/,/"iY''I\\ 11'''7k;,,-çik'b** ¡¡,',,,'\' 11)', l' ~ 'b,¡V, )'¡D~J}h"'Ah¿¡;"ffifL:/1m *Vi_"IJh1?\1 /"th"'1ffi""jì /111\[;\,1111 , The City of Chula Vista and the Port of San Diego are engaged in significant redevelopment efforts on the Chula Vista Baytront. The Port of San Diego recently purchased the SDG&E facility comprised of approximately 150 acres, and is in the process of purchasing the southern portion of the BFG Campus, representing an additional 90+ acres. The Port intends to redevelop both properties with commercial uses including office, retail, hotel and entertainment. In addition, the City of Chula Vista is poised to process a 130-acre mixed use development, including residential, office, entertainment retail and hotel, on the northern portion of the Baytront. The Coronado Branch bisects all of the properties, impeding the development of these properties as well as pedestrian and vehicular access to the Baytront. The line has had limited use during the past several decades, and has fallen into disrepair. Staff is pursuing efforts to remove this biighting influence to promote the redevelopment of the Baytront and enhance public access to the waterfront area. That Council approve the Resolution supporting the abandonment of the Coronado Branch rail along the Chula Vista Baytront and direct staff to work with MTDB, the Port District and other agencies to accomplish such abandonment. Not applicable. 1. Status of Projects As mentioned, there are several redevelopment opportunities unfolding on the Baytront. Below is the current status of each. a. Duke Energy (formerly SDG&E) (see Exhibit 1) Three of the tanks along the northern portion of the property are being removed, which will be complete by the end of the year. This will make approximately 30 acres avaiiable for redevelopment. in addition, a 30 acre parcel is presently available on the southern portion of the plant. r-j .- PAGE 2. ITEM '6 MEETING DATE 07-27-99 b. BFG Goodrich (formerly Rohr) (see Exhibit 1) The Port is presently acquiring the southem campus comprised of 90+ acres. The South Campus will be cleared over the next four years. The Port will be soliciting development proposals for the property in the next six months. Expected development includes office, retail and hotel and is planned to begin in the next 2-3 years. BFG is consolidating their campus north of H Street and plan to invest $40 million in improvements over the next 4 years. c. Midbayfront (north of Lagoon Drive) (see Exhibit 1) The City of Chula Vista is anticipating processing a 130 acre $500 million mixed-use development including residential, hotel, office, and entertainment retail. The project, if submitted, is planned to begin in 2000 and will be complete by 2004. 2. Proposal for Abandonment Staff is proposing that the tracks from SR 54 south to 7th Street in Imperial Beach be removed. In addition, Staff is proposing that MTDB allow respective property owners/interested parties, presently including the Port of San Diego, BF Goodrich and Tuchscher Development Enterprises, to purchase the easement. 3. Existing Condition of the Coronado Branch The Coronado Line is 7.2 miles and begins near the 1-5 over-crossing of the Main Line in National City and extends south along the west side of 1-5 to Main Street in Chula Vista. From Main Street, the line tums west to Imperial Beach and terminates near 7th Street (see Exhibit 2). The connection to the Main Line at 1-5 in National City has been removed. Presently the only operable Main Line connection is at F Street in Chula Vista, which is substandard. The line north of F Street into National City has not been used for many years and has fallen into disrepair. The portion across the Sweetwater channel is impassable. Currently the only portion of the line that is operational is from F Street south to the Westem Salt Works (see Exhibit 3). The portion of the line running west to Imperial Beach is impassable, and the line running west from Imperial Beach to Coronado has been removed The Coronado Branch would require significant investment over the entire length to become operable. A new connection to the Main Line would be needed at either Palm Avenue, Civic Center Drive or F Street to allow for freight to the 24fu Street Terminal in National City. 4. Impacts on the "Jobs Train" or "NAFTA Train" Proposal The Jobs Train will be unaffected by the abandonment of the Coronado Branch. The Coronado Branch does not run south past Chula Vista, providing no connection to Mexico (see Exhibit 4). The Main Line located on the east side of Interstate 5 spans the entire State of Califomia and runs into Mexico. The Main Line is able to accommodate the MTDB Trolley, as well as freight, and will require no track improvements to run freight south into Mexico. 5. Completing the Bay Shore Bikeway The abandonment of the Coronado Branch makes it possible for the Bay Shore Bikeway to be completed allowing for public access to San Diego Bay's shore from San Diego to Coronado (see Exhibit 5). The Bay Shore Bikeway will be l-d-. --. - PAGE 3, ITEM 'X MEETING DATE 07-27-99 able to cross the Sweetwater Channel and traverse the Chula Vista Bayfront and be connected with the existing bikeway on the Imperial Beach bay shore completing the path. 6. Benefits of Abandoning the Coronado Branch Removing the Coronado line has several benefits, which are summarized below. a. The removal of an undevelopable easement along the entire length of the Chula Vista Bayfront will allow for complete and efficient utilization of the presently bisected properties. b. The closure of the line will remove a blighting influence and promote revitalization in accordance with State Redevelopment Law. c. Abandonment of the line will remove an impediment to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, as well as coastal access. d. Having the ability to utilize this property will facilitate cohesive planning and development of valuable coastal property. e. Abandonment will allow the redevelopment of 12 underutilized acres. f. Removing the tracks will enhance the development opportunities for the Midbayfront, BF Goodrich Campus, and SDG&E properties, which collectively represent 350+ acres. g. Abandonment of the F Street spur will provide an opportunity for a pedestrian link from the Bayfront to the east side of Interstate 5, E Street Trolley Station and adjacent development. h. The removal of the Coronado Branch will not affect the operation of the NAFT A Train. i. Abandonment of the railroad will allow for the completion of the Bay Shore Bikeway. There is no fiscal impact related to this action other than staff time. However, abandonment of the Coronado Branch will have significant positive economic impacts resulting from enhanced Bayfront development opportunities. The removal of the lines will facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement, as well as coastal access. Removing the tracks that presently bisect the affected properties will allow for maximum utilization of the property, increasing the viability of the development opportunties. 1. Bayfront Aerial 2. Rail Map - Existing Condition 3. Rail Map - Operable/Abandoned Portions 4. Rail Map - Mexico Line 5. Greg Cox letter dated 7/21/99 IDDAI H'IHDMEICDMMDEVISTAFf.REPI618/99IDTVRNAME.CHG [J,'v 22. 1999111'62AMII g-j ..- ..........--.......-.,- If COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. ¡9Slf.b RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE ABANDONMENT OF THE CORONADO BRANCH RAIL ALONG THE THE CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT AND DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK WITH MTDB, THE PORT DISTRICT AND OTHER AGENCIES TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABANDONMENT WHEREAS, The City of Chula Vista and the Port of San Diego are engaged in significant redevelopment efforts on the Chula Vista Bayfront; and WHEREAS. The Coronado Branch bisects all of the Bayfront properties. impeding development of these properties, as well as pedestrian and vehicular access to the Bayfront; and WHEREAS, The abandonment of the Coronado Branch will promote redevelopment efforts and enhance public access to the waterfront area; and WHEREAS, The abandonment will not have a negative impact on regional projects such as the Jobs Train,or on operating a freight line into Mexico; and WHEREAS, The abandonment will facilitate the completion of the Bay Shore Bikeway, which serves the region; and NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista supports the abandonment of the Coronado Branch rail along the Chula Vista Bayfront and directs staff to work with MTDB, the Port District and other agencies to accomplish such abandonment. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ Sí~~ ../ Chris Salomone Director of Community Development ~~4 ",,---_.._--- "..--..-.--.. - ~ ~.., i EXHIBIT 2 C'J~'JJ 0g5'" - . ... I ~ -<:0= o ~ ~ r- n "'nO @z ~>,¡- ;:~o~or- ;s:",,11C ~i'8'Vig"" ~-'" ... VI :; C AI ~ zO 3 ~ CI. I!o CI. m .. AI C iJ ""z ¡=.2>I:IaZ ",0 _ 0 It "" .. c JI" .., :J '< I""" II /\ i: ;' ~ ,il · .. .. ::r ~j .. , II · · ... , · ... ., c .' ~ ", .\ " .' '" · " · "," · · ''0 · '<ii)' · ... · Q · · · · · · · · · 1:- , . . \. -- . fT\ , ,y . · · \ · · · · · · - , if ~ , , ~ I ~ ,; " ",Qm \ ' n - ;:. c '" ê VI 3 'T! ... þRJÛÕ - .. ::I ~ :g tD ,.,. {"O ." I» Þ ~ _,··w . ,¡... ~ ~ .' . "III " "..' ..., ''''IIII' "."... ~ ' '. ', a.~ -..r' o<J. ~-, , ;,"'~' . '"' ":" '." "'l-:' '';O''¡ '.'. -:~I' >;·tI·...n:· .... - "....,., I·~·· "/.... .~ ,\1. "1 ~,! ~ ~...," ! " -" . -, ,', ~'\'.- " . : ' ..' I' . /,' ,,;~~"íl 1..0-, ¡ ,;'.':bI. , . ,- ' '/'.j, "" ¡I ~I .~. . i'~~_..,~. I.: "'f'-.-.w.:." :. : _ ~ /:¡¡¡, \>-;'~~ '11'.:;;_( Irl';;~ I" ¡ !';.~~ . J~ ~ ~¿j , ..~ ."'\ '""""'-~~ ..... " I __ , ' '." , ..~ - IJl.M I - ~,! J f I~" J .c. tJ! I Jt':1;Z 1 . ........... ,f, . '1~fMJ!~ !i! . i '~.. ..... ". .'-t,;'"-II!IJW ¡:,;'" 1¡'( '1' /',1. '.' .' ,.,.,;;,,,.,.. 1'11",1 " .' . " ,'~ \ I i ôf'I:':,. ~ . , { . (~U I .'t';· ·/~;:·; ~;:.: "~~:; r 1IIII ii' ;~):, if' - ''::~':''~~,., :"'ldW.1Ii I'~ .. ,10<,.. '- . "._.~_:.-:: " '¡¡;..,-"'W",~, ... ,.~.. -...... .-..... -.... - ,'.'" ii' ..' r.. .... I~_W>:I;" ! , "..t "'. ¡,. . '.. I. '. . .~¡~ -,~ . -, " ' ," ,.~ j .... ,,..,., . I ì c.;;~J:,.' ¡ (, \ ,I I' ' ,.~,.., '.... . /Jî' , "'-... ,) ,'\ ~f. . -~~ ~ ~ . ,..~~ """",., "Ie , ;".;....-,.:,.~.~ . '~'" "AI / '. 'f~: ¡ I .'. .;;'" '" < - :t ,-, '4, : i,.",¡ . . . ':"IC;' :~:.;.~\~ ..., .,."." ~ . ,t-,,·~··. 'f">.""' ..' . .... ..' .' .-,. -' "fi:" ...' I .', "!' ~"':,é' . ë "J:~~;'_ ' ... , ...., .,.,.':¡. . I -;'1. .., '--........, il~'J!!!r.ï... .\\~i;~·\.'qt' ,--:-.,1. -.-::.=.?~. "..,....~ Ir! 41' .' ji ' '... r~ ,J'I.I~·'r< ' . ;¡, . . I ,... .,-,,, "f I -..... ,_1.". . ...." .iI,/1 :_..~-.'...::_. . ...~~.::Z;.r J¡~I '.. .' t ,'.' .:: ~ '... . . ,;. ....Jj~"'.. .! 't>rt'C·c...,·...·f..liiõI! .,¿. 'L~'1~):-; . i.., :". '" .',~ "M"-' ~t~..' .. 1ft,", ~::.t :, . ." tõ;;"/¡ r ~ '."..".. _ '-I' ~ - I rf;:;'ì JJl1'I:!·~~fJ: :'1 'I. 1.......'..., ..ii~..-.;.¡;:... ~- '.IIm!:.:- '. - . -; ":~~ : _.j. ~. '.1.:.,.-.,) .,~,.;.. Ñ~~ '.U,.·. ~:-'i:' ~~........ .~¡¡¡~h.t.~~.::i.;I"?,¡f......;. ,_. 1 , I 3..-.........",_.;._;_,..;....~..."...; ''''._ . '-."1i' -,,~ '" . '."- '" .' ..~ '. .......~1,1.... I ¡:¡f!~S ,:",.,~....: ~', - ,=1 :,!', ' Il"'!' ~,..~~":_._~j~_ I . } ".&. ,_-,,:! ., """'-,' "~'. .,Iï.1,,_rt:;,A! . "-. I 'Ub.".." .,".~- ~... -." ~. 'W.. ~~~ U"-:: ~.'_,~.. - i . ~ .H" P'Wtt~r-";' . ,". ~:~·:'i:'._L~ ~ ... ' fl 1 ì¡;~t):"", ~ ¡.o.. &W.~\\W:I" :_. '~j';'" ,~... w. ~-; ,~ ':.. ._, ',J~, '.¡,:.... ~ ...;~' ' t t!".~.~.I'..,.,.,..,....., -...., ..~. 'tJJ' ,:to,'.. 'i:.-tt~"-"!'>., ' ';;.':~:;~~'r'·~;:":- '.":"~,.'" ". :~u,..:,:,.,-;~;.:. ~ ;uu'a}u.~ß;..'""..:..:?'..~.,~~,_'t.~..'}-=, _~ . :.dtU...~~~~~i. ' ,~~=:\~~i::,:' . :~~~.'.:,; l:~~:.~·â .:~ '.!.!!'\."1~/.,.II':"'JHO':..'! I, .',,,,,¡,:,¡;,, ~~II'~ . '-'~-1 :l:£'~-1Jìì""'iÌJ"~" ',,",,'.;" :~ü.¡, ~ ." ,.,. "4 ~~', filii' JI~q~ ". ......,... . - . . !,',~ ~', -.:t . '1 ~: ~tJ. ~ ~~ , .. . '. ...-.. ~."-""'.. ..t...! {i-. ., '''''. . ._ ~'t: ' , ··15·"'....'- .¡~ RJfl 'r ' ,I' _~ì:~_i~;::'--:·.d'-:::!tSJë.. ..:..,'\..,J ·~.~1_~ ·f' ,,~. "I.' ..~. ,.: I!/~.. "To 1',' -~ .. ~¡."~.':;..I.);>,¡t..,¡t. . . ~ t.,:'·~ '1\ " . .,,-. r':~ : "r"' ~¡",._._._ '::. ï ,i ~ ..'.:: ---- -, '" ~ "J ¥o-~<Io ,\~t~1~ _ t..,., B . l ., I -..".... t p. WI... '" ..~. ~4 ......., :!, . '"P ~-~ \.' .....'tl>; . ~ :- --':fÍt..: ~ t~ .-;í;' ¡I.~' " ...-- ,~; '. \ -a. ~I·" ~... I~' "'~. ¡ I '. ..'. "i'1I; .\-"",,=. ........, If":.' ~,., ~_ _t '.' ( f!,,!i Þ".. ... '.." ,,;;'~ _ r too r"t..lo.. '--1"\.... O;\.~_l!..:...t..,... ",' -"""" '." ·1""""" . ;"-I"''''I''FI''''''':'';;;' - \ .. - L,) . 11 II,: "". ~t- a.~ _, "',f' i ~J ~ ~.¡'I \?.'I:\~lb,..,:·.: ~'t'-' ~ .Jr...~d(Ú~'of"'" ·r.;7 ¡. f"A'-"- ,........ ~~I~.~t!'...1t'l. 3 , t.a,,~t~ i~ Ij' ,!. ~...'~ \11:.. ",~'~I !-.'1.....1..I'~1 'I"I~~'''''''''''''''Þ'~I ,. '" . ,... , . Jil"I~ .tl!;l!"!'-!L 1'1> ¡ \'.'f~"~ r..... I j . ~ -" '. 131 1.1:'" r-'I' 1111' I II I '..' .... r.~ '!'~. -'~~1 ....-. ,,' ·"....~.t '~.. ..;.....!II,i ¡, ,'~:"-'~,ffiI,: ).,~~~t;¡ï '~'" " , '" t"· r ".; ;1 ,,'; i ··.J:7}'1 .. '"', ! =::æia.~'~-., ,,¡..:t..; ~"'~ ...·!jIIL.!\:.:.).;:T~·:"Ü . . . -. ,'\ . "l:Iil-"i~'I: .' _I,; :~'. ':~: JO",\": ,,~¡. ,\, . - -.., - r:¡ -", _ " .. ." '.v ~ ..__ r"' -, 1 .~- -, -)ft .:~f""'''\''''''''' .... . _"""'¡;;.'"'". ,~.. ¡ fJ~~ 1&""""'.. '-. I· I....~¡:.=:>,"';··..,;;',~ ['.;"i~.',.. :-""".t. ..' ~ ,.' "':r.:-'1 'õllt....C..-~·~·.u·,···>~,·!IIt~· >T1,.wc.:,"I_., "!'d ,,, \, -'. :1I..:.::·:·I'...';h..~i!'.!..¡:,¡¡~ ....·~;:û·.,; .;¡,¡¡;,;.. \'>'1(.,. '''1. '. '" . , . ·11' ".. i.~~~~· .t:¡¡,,~.~n;:g, ¡':','. f îr1iiip: :,': UI ¡:;~. i'tk·! :: I¡ . _ i ~~~~~h~;ÊU~"f~'~~~"'; r¡¡)(,!I~~'r! .'~~ ¡-. .. '" \,., "-J '--. .." ,'- . ,'. ,~ ¡êr. ~_f~., Ü;:l!;#!iH¡:~",,- L;,;... .. .... . _. ...... '~. _ .- '. . . . ..... ·'--'f"-": "0" .. ~ .. "~..,~ ....., , '.,;¡, , 'c _---t,1: '.. ", .. .......,. »; _..,pc,_",. , ..¡~.'..::..-'''I'¡......... L .. '-II'" \~ . 'P'':·.} ,''f'' "-= :::-_... ~): 6'.. --~-=-_"""" . ..~ ,. .I"iõ1., 'J ,,..- -'j . .'I{'.!"..~.\ , ! I' 1~~;,<~{..;!5!:1.:.;.~"'·.¡ ~ 1.t,,\.,'IU."'~,...'..'I.;;~;..; .~ . ' ", -.. .' . - . '... ~" .... ". I>f, " ...... \)- .'/ ""'(J'!IJ~!!i~ ,'. i ,.... 4,.,.." . ,.., '.;iI¡'j'ñ,", :..¡..i'.·..,.4. ' 1;,\ ï')-N~"¡ J,,'~'" ",", .'..' ~. ..·"!b.:I:.:}~'~..,.,,'J,~_:'... .~W..,~ "I ·I~~ 1, '~I ¥I' "':" .. l.:3,'i. '''''I'''''.''~''~-'.. .I';'*" '."'" t I' ==! ,: '1""" " ..' "'1' ",,,,;~'';'.''~'~ I'Ll ... . ~I' ¡";I!" ¡ II!. .. ... :::=' . !..' I ,.. ~. ,I ""1 ;' " , '-l.' '¡:',:I¡ ~"_ .._ ..'" ì .';..d , ~... 1'" __....~ .',.:;_.=:...-:..... ' ..t'!~\\\\'.lW:W',\·,: .J..I~..'_'~' 'I' '(~" "::1 .' Jill: ,.1...~..(.\~,~,r.~-,-...;.¡ , '''ül.i":ili¡',, ' ,= . . 'u::' ~'!:::"~~no.., '."'~'..'''' ... , ' ,\?"...."'",. ,I-.~,~. I,·~.. . ·....'.......11 ff..~.,"f''''' ..c¡.,L'\'i"'" . ~/ill~r'·,~;~:~~. ;~'.. _ ~ ,I' :':. \," "'; ,"4.1 "~'iï~"'- .r·it ~'c..~~~:~,.<~~:..~··1 \, ,;..:~~:,(~~ I ~\!!h.·Í!'~·~ . .q:..." !f.-.:".~·':::;"'t' '.¡II,:I ..~. :L~~·L"~'::æ. . ':'\"~~!''''f' , ..... - - '.",'.. 'W,"h' I,;;,,~ . _ '. "r"'~ .':;'''~'\\''~\'~ .'. .1, .1"- ,. L;; ,. . '0\" -,,' .' '.,.1 ..' "'.' ,".' "\.""""+.'''' - ,,, 11'11' . II' '.."~,,, 1..:'1' ,.....,... ¡'IZ'. ., .... ". [' . t "','.'~'., -'" '. . .' ,,\\,..I~ '" ~"""""" """'-;' ,_','" . " j , -.' '...... .....t·~'·~',.II:"-:¡, -,..".1 . - I 1..' . "1,'. " . '. . -.. " - "a . ,.,,~» C··..,···· ...¡f1 ,..., J I . ¡ ....-...,.. - ....-:-._'~':. .....~, . 't: I {. . f~~~.t.::;, ;:~~~ ~.:£~~" , ' , ¡_ ~.. ,f ~:, " . ;,:J.' f' I· ..,,"" ~·,n·, ..' -~''''~' J'" .11 .it1I!II':_ '1<f '.=: '; .. . .....t.~Þr._ ,.:...F.~.~~"-,___._.. ~ (. . .. ., if·· ~'.." '. ';, i, ' 1..~"iJ:t~-"1:i ~~'í1,:. Iii Y., '. I : ¡¡-:i:!,¡~ "'. "~:;':.' I. ~'. ',=!',:~~,:~,¡.,,,~....,.~ , ._. ... . -, ;. ""1 v ,"!-'::.'...;;.... <'~':' I ';. I '. ' . ,.~"'...¡¡.... , . I'~' . ,~"·.~·.I·.,. .h.!,.., ',,,,,,. _', .,.... e" I' ¡ , .' .. . '" ,; ; .... :,;':: ,....~..;.!. .:I!".......".:" . '"... ,'. , ." ", 'I' ""', . . '.',. .... . "..I......l..., L ~........~.... ì.; . ~ I '. . , " ~ ., . " . ..'.. '. . (. ~ .. .,...,.. .... f I :>:;,...1\". ii, . ". . \ --- ...:Eo__·..... '-'" '"f1Þ'.",4ì"· y~'r"¡-' "" ....¡..'.. ,_. JP.~' -~,,~ ~-. ,.......' ~'" .'~ .011':' ~ ...- ,,', ..,' ~:""'lIoL,1"'''¡ 'j- - ·~·oi.;l~a-.,.-.J,.to ."" ~ . '/'I'I.....'..~::¡.~..'-I'.:h-t ,.-- ~..\·~..!~~~·~Il.,., ~"I,J f, ....":.~::..>~ ."~ ",,~ ", l~~,Ur....".. ~""':ï..<?~j ~.t:::~~-¡r~,' :r.~~ I,,,".., ,.¡ -.' "'~'" '.. .., '" ~... . .......'t1.. ..... ......'" (,--~. " . 1_" ':'.:'1.., ...,'" :""\.'iì','~ iI. ',":.",~.\~...... -....~..~,\....10"" ..:0. .' "~'''~'~r .. '.1-\"" , ~.. " ( '.10 '\.. _ _. to ,'. r;:.. .J .~, '\ ,..a;.. ""u ~w'j , ..i;j.., ! ""I.~II¡ . I, .1···..·,,:. .~. .:. ", ._. '. ,j f..;-. ".J" ~ '. . ".. .,,-", '" I», ~~.~.} ,..1 .J ...., '\" _'. ;-l, ;,......:". ',. ,,,,'.'''''''''' ">'t. "¡¡T....;-¡;î ..."., .~ . "'/'/ ',,!oI.' ..... ,....'... ~ 't! -.c....."" ~,.~ s.. '._ ,.., ~,' "JII'" '.~:':'.:'~ ~' . ,'., '. " '~,~, .,.. . ~.' ....... . " '\. .,~._j (.. ,'¡O1,' ,.I . '~~""".i", j"';~:,. .'-::..: '~'1""", \¡... "....:..~ 't.,-;l>; '~í;t~"!M'~··- ¡, A~,' , -" ·trf' b.":' ~"¡'.I. ~-,t~i.".o;~:~""~'.....;.l'''''-''''~'''-".~!'~'_ .' , F. 'I"'JI\..~ , \.. ~u, _ ( .,' 4.\;1 ~;\~ :...-~-".~.,::. ..~.: 'r~ ;:'"ir ..J¡. ~¡~~~:~.~ .';¡--·_-:~I·1> )f~t. r . ... 0.,.,., '. . ,"~. , ., . .. ~'_. " "'. .'. . "'~"."" ~-::,~.,J -I'. '~'.I..'IiI:."~, 'I '~'~.:-~~J·"'J:.II' ..r;-~H·~:-' I).. ':....''''..,',.:.~':.,.fd":.~r... "'''~'7f:' f, i'·''''_)~:~u~·":..':''.J.~,t.:. A"..' 1-...... ,"t-4""'4,~.~..~-......_~,.,. .. -'. .... ..' '~..... ", . " ". ';"..;, ""~," -, .'."..._''-:'. !.. '0 ~":'''.: ' ~- - ~ ." --. ~ ) - - :t--t"., ,.7 J'J .- i è., -I, , l..... -., 1:'~~"'1I I:IJ1'1 ~ J;io""''''. "I "\, llij, ,.:,.~..... ... ~-..,.._, . -- -:. ',. '...:::~: tl .,;.'t'.;'I,.~..ij~.~,.,...~. ...." !,"-i'1 · .. ..-.....,' ~.'~' i~, M'\-\,·~, ·...,1~_...", _: -,......:J"~--"-..I't... -.,(1. .....'_ f~¡, .. · . . ',., ,;, ~¡.',a;,.,. ,;.' r J-,--.' ....~,.... I..",;",,,: '?...'" ' '¡ ..".l"..,::~,. H~......"}'" '.J''''''t.':'~''''''Ji",'',=--.\I..5 / · . { I ~ I; ,::: ":':;', """"":~i"e;"n~; iì'!';:~'JJ~ ",otr,;i,';ìr,: · .. · , I '....... ,·~r,,;1I"l1l""'·· .:;¡,.~",-".:.¡.- ,...;". ,,:,,"I:.,:.t~''''''''..'...:.'''~'t ~ .. J ... 1'[ ,~:\..--:.;,".='A:r~;1"';il.~;:"" ..;...... ."\¢ t·:· '~~~,,",j~~:.::;~..~~:.:,~.~~ · '( ~'\ '~....:>.~:".1'1.:!' 1!.-I,,'.-.~...C'~ . \1'.",).>"111,;.1.11:Io., ¡..¡:"" .. . ,¡ 1, II"'~ &'~.-1~",.:,t¡¡I.';'.:.'\' "f~-.J.t...~~·.".;."...\·,~";.....;tnlt'J" ....' ., ~ ....', t' .Jr'" ¡' .' ''''''''11'''''' '''''.'.. . · .' ., ";a.;:... t·; " ,¡,..., "'1;IN;.~'\''':'::''''.t..-..",,~~.... . " ., ........ ." ',.'.. · ., ~'''' , ~ "'" ,. '"''1''''' ..'or"0 ..' ,...,~" · :.-, ,:."":",,....". ',' '.1 .; ....,~ ,..)-..' "I¡'. ...-.~.,.;o".~,.\.Ò" .. ¡ , ' . " .)~.." .. .. , '. '. .. "J ' . ".~;;! ~.-v... ~',...'! --."'\.,,,," ~.- . . "_~' ·\.-tiIlJ'.' ¡"'t,..,- . 1 , . ;' -,. .. ,....... '.. .. . ,t!" '. , .. . . ." 'J . ¡>f¡,.( . ~";"~:,.¡,."..;,¡,,~ ~·::>.:-~":rl·'. f!TlI~-'s5':¡;':>' · .1/' "I :.~~:;. -;y:; :- - ·:-~"~l·:~;:.":. '. ,', ~.:-;. }.. I.'\,~~ \ /'i I ~...' k": ""'.''''''''¡'''''' .;r:¡ ~.~ ::-.' lUlU ..~~~., '. ., " ':,\,. ,:~~ ~ "'.-:'. i' ~. ,,~...., ""...,...~ ", ",'--'Ai ¡ I "'J .' ~ "..1:.- 'OJ " '" t. -.. L_.... 1:"'. . . ;-:-".. ,.,.~;..:: ....:~~.~;~ '" ~ I .1/ ~ tlall'.'.',I'. "'-., ">....~tol..., ~ r ". ......... .".. ,~,~,' .." . I ,:, .. UCJ:i"'-,' ,... ,...r.. ..,. ' ...... .......,. '-"~.\"'i J "1 -~·'P."·IUl f'}~ ,-.~. ..~I'.iIi' .11.,·., j'"; ..'..,.¡'í1....j ~..\ ::1 ' , ! ~.&.II.¿.&I~, 1--" 06'.lI . .... -., . , ~ , _..- ~ I ~·I i EXHIBIT 3 ~> - I O",[J) - ..:"'~ "II 0'" ..¡ I I ~o o"o...",r-n -@Z ~n 1;1 ~ CD::\ c Õ ., c ;;~. _... = '8 -! ~ r- ~ 0 II ~" ....... ° 1""1 .. ..,(JQ ;, "," '< .. ~ " C'\ ...._ = ..." AI ;¿O oiD3!"",Qo",rn z .... -" AI 0 "'Ô I'" "II; :. 0 » '" z 00 _.O_oï:'ITI"'C .., ;, ~ "'< ~ DO Š;Z III -' " -. ~ " " :þ:Þ · þg 1Df9:r" "'..; · ~ VI žÕ · CD Dol "'Z · ~ ~ ....¡:Þ .1 Go 'a ",I"" :i ~ ~ :::on 1.' · ~;:¡ .1 : .' .:1 .'.. 3 - \: n , · III ." · CL · · · · · · · · .... : \ · . . ' ~ ,I · . · · · · · · · · · · · · ; 1)- - · · o L " : 3:z · ~ · "'.. · >< 0 · -" .. · c . - l · n 1"1 .. : 0 "r·,1 · . · · . · . · . . · \ -., _~fL\ · · · . , · \ · · \ · · · - \ · · - \ \ :1' " r . . ~ \ ~ ~ ërm ~ n - \ c.CCD ~ VI 3 ." ~:þ!{ Q ~ ., ,... ¡; '" CD 0 I", a> :Þ ~ _ ~ EXH'BrT' S¡i:' ~ <0= ~(")~ ~> :;. ~..,<JI ¡>j-Q zO ..,z ",0 .., · · · · · :' " · ' , " · ') i ' '" : 0 I: !: · W c · L! ~ · ' ... · ' ," /' : I 1:lj'I' 1°~' · . '." . ,-. · ,,' II,',. ,S," . · ' "."" . ' ." ", '. · .. _ . (" J,. ,,' ': ',~I,:'~'I,I ,,-,. · Ii t./... :' :::I. · ' I. '," ;' .[1' ..... .J;! . · 'II"I'"'':'~''''' ,I . .",.,¡..,\ · ¡¡, ~ _.. , ii' ',',.,!i'.''"'~~J'-' ,i". , ' · _.O'·i .,,,,,', · .." 1iT~,' ,!o\' I _0_," · ¡. '/........ :>~~,_. I - . ' ; , ~:',.jJ,:':' """'. . - , 'ID' ,~:-t',-. .., I ~. . ' . ...... ,. I . ,..' #11>" · 1:Ie: ,~.Jt.',,"I;.i'\" .. ;: '" -. ~I~~\.......I \ --'.' · I .. - , *I: .·c· " ,I" · =:!!' '.~:. '., 1 f' ')" : I AS;: ,i "" !. · I ~-E' 1.;1 · :l:~" .. · 0.," '" ,"' Õ;: ~~~ · ,;_ Ii ~II--Vl"'" · '"''' ," .. , , · .... .' .' · C!!i . II~' ':"'- ","'''' · .., ' ...,..~ ..="O: · ""10 0 , ....·E i · ........ 0 ' "-.. · DJ' ,.....,. r =""'$ · _!!i II " ~.'" · C, '~ ., · n¡¡:':S · ,ø.." . .' "", "';. · I . ¡¡... .. \ 0',1 · .'"'.., · II '\. ,II ."u ,.- \' '< ¡ : · ' ~ · t_ .... · '\: .. · ' .. ~ . ji ;1:; \' I I · "" \ I /Þ "a n "a ::I 00" ~ 0 ~ m ~ \ ... ""I: 0 "" ... C :IC 1Þ0'l:l..........-· ::¡ ::¡ 0 ... '< C '" \ : ~ ~ > C ~ ~ . ... ~ /Þ m /Þ ::I , - 0 ~ '" ~ "" 5' II 0 ~ /Þ ¡; ~ íD "'I: pfo _. ;¡. tD ~ ::I ........::¡ ~ :;; II> ¡ 3 ~ '< ~ - ... :;; .. o::rS:-'::¡'<'" Z 3 ~ /Þ::¡ /Þ '< Q nO!!! ... '" IÞ n I -~ ~~/Þ ~ ... g ~2 ~_3~ _. III - 0:: _ _.... "C - : tI) 11\ .. .", IÞ C IÞ I'" _.:1 ~ '" " ... ~ ,.,.,.,. 111 ""I: ~ - '" tD ....,þ.. -. - ~ It) _j.."J 0 .'" ::I fa EXHIBIT 5 GREG COX SUPERVISOR, FIRST DISTRICT SAN DIEGO COUNTY IOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 21,1999 Leon Williams, Chairman Metropolitan Transit Development Board 1225 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000 San Diego, CA 92101-7490 Dear ChTW~I~: On behalf of the Bayshore Bikeway Committee, I am writing to request the opportunity to make a presentation on the Bayshore Bikeway to the MTDB Board of Directors on August 12, 1999. It is my understanding that already docketed for your board meeting is a presentation/discussion item on the dinner/excursion train proposals. To summarize our proposal for the Coronado Branch Line, we would like to suggest that thre¡ additional alternatives be considered that would enable the Bayshore Bikeway to move forward. First, a license agreement between MTDB and the City ofChula Vista for use of the Coronado Branch Line. Second, outright abandonment of the Coronado Branch Line. Finally, acquisition of the Coronado Branch Line by the City of Chula Vista and/or other interested parties. I believe that the viability of the dinner/excursion train proposals are minimal and would respectfully request that the Board of Directors allow us to move forward with a plan to place the Bayshore Bikeway on the right-of-way of the Coronado Branch Line. Our most urgent need is completing the Sweetwater Marsh segment between National City and E Street in Chula Vista. We would also request the opportunity to brief the Executive Committee at their August 5,1999 meeting on the above alternatives. It is my belief that the public would be best served if the Coronado Branch Line were accessible to the public as an alterÌ1ative transportation corridor. Thank you for your consideration. GREG CO Supervisor, irst District cc: Mayor Shirley Horton David Rowlands COUmY ADMINISTRATION CENTER -1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, ROOM 335 . SAN DIEGO, CA 92101·2470 . (619) 531-5511 Fax (619) 23S-0644 o 'mled on f'K:\IC'-d pOØOIf - 7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. t¡ Meeting Date 7/27/99 ITEM TITLE: Resolution /95' 'Itl Adopting a Revised City Council Policy, Number 478"'3, AlI-W.y SIDp. '¢I SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public worksß?f REVIEWED BY: City-.g~~ :./? (4/Sths Vote: Yes _ No ...K.) (Council Referral #: 3051) At a past City Council meeting, Council directed that staff and the Safety Commission review the current system of warrant criteria for stop signs or other traffic controls and examine a more flexible, hybrid approach. As a part of this past discussion on neighborhood traffic controls, staff had reported that numerous requests for all-way stops along East "J" Street had been investigated, but none of the locations met the Council Policy on All-Way Stops currently in use. Council directed staff to review the current system of warrants and return to Council with a revised policy. Such a hybrid approach could allow for evaluation of objective criteria, input received from the community, other traffic concerns and the informed judgment of the staff and committee members. This proposal was made as a means of reaching more of a consensus recommendation prior to staff, the commission and the neighborhood bringing their concerns before the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the resolution adopting a revised policy for the Installation of All-Way Stop Control. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: The Safety Commission at their meeting of May 13, 1999, voted MSC (Liken/Lopez) 5-0-1 with Commissioner Acton absent, to accept the staffs report which recommends changes to the existing Policy Number 478-03, dated April 23, 1991 and adopted by Council Resolution No. 16147. After months of discussion, several workshop meetings and many versions of a proposal for a revised policy, staff and the Commission agreed to forward this revised policy to the City Council with a recommendation that Council approve the resolution adopting this revised policy. DISCUSSION: The existing All-Way Stop Policy is based on criteria listed in the CalTrans Traffic Manual and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Actual need for an all-way stop is determined by an engineering study which examines the special characteristics of the site. The existing policy states that the purpose of a fully justified, properly installed all-way stop is to effectively assign right-of-way, maintain safety and reduce vehicle delay. The City's policy for the installation of an all- way stop control is based on a point system. Under that system, points are assigned to traffic factors based on the severity of traffic conditions and a minimum number of points, 30, is required before a stop sign is warranted. The factors under the policy are: 1. Accident records - Points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an an all- way stop control during a full one-year period. q-j ~ Page 2, Item Cj Meeting Date 07/27/99 2. Unusual conditions - Points are assigned for unusual conditions such as a school, fire station, playground, horizontal or vertical curve where those conditions exist within 500 feet of the intersection. 3. Pedestrian volumes - Points are assigned to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major street during the four busiest hours of the day. 4. Traffic volumes - Points are assigned dependent uon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the intersection on all legs of the intersection; and 5. Traffic volume differentials - Points are assigned based on the differential in traffic volumes between the major street approach and the minor street approach (all -way stops work best when the approach traffic volumes are nearly equal on each leg of the intersection). In addition, if anyone of CalTrans' criteria are met a stop sign is warranted even if the minimum points under the City policyis not met. CaITrans' criteria are: 1. A traffic signal is warranted and urgently needed, the stop sign may be an interim measure. 2. There are five or more accidents within a 12 month period correctible by a stop sign installation. 3. Total vehicular volume from all approaches to the intersection averagesa at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours;and the combined vehicular and pedestrian volume for the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to the minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour; but when the 85-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. Since the existing policy has been in effect, there have been a number of instances whereby the issue of an all-way stop control intersection was brought to the City Council for resolution. As a result of these discussions Council instructed staff to review the stop sign warrants and come up with a more flexible approach which will better meet the needs of the community and increases traffic safety. The revised recommended policy is more comprehensive and should be more responsive to the Council's direction. The following is a summary of the major changes: 1 Accident Warrant For this criteria, the assigned number of points per collision was increased ftom 2 points to 5 points and the maximum was increased from 14 points to a maximum possible of25 points. 2 Unusual Conditions Warrant The number of points per unusual condition was increased from 2 points to 7 points and the possible maximum was increased from 10 points to 21 points. In residential neighborhoods where there is a concentration of school- age activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a collector and coupled with other conditions, the 3D-point minimum point requirement may be waived. The title of q- ;¿ ~ Page 3, Item q Meeting Date 07/27/99 the person waiving the minimum point requirement was changed from the "City Traffic Engineer" to the City Engineer, or his designee, in order to be consistent with current staffing titles. The unusual conditions are described more specifically in the existing and proposed policies. 3 Pedestrian Volumes The relative importance of pedestrian traffic was increased by increasing the maximum attainable number of points from 5 points to 20 points. In addition, the point matrix was changed to cover the peak Dedestrian hour in contrast to the four busiest vehicular hours. These changes also reduce the number of staff hours required to obtain the necessary data. 4 Traffic Volumes The maximum number of points for vehicular volume was increased ÍÌ'om 15 points to 24 points. On the major approach leg, the number of points assigned increases as the vehicular volume approaches 2600 vehicles per hour and then starts decreasing until 380 I vehicles per hour are reached and the number of points reduces to zero. This criteria has a maximum of 5 points. On the minor approach leg, the number of points increases up to a maximum of 10 points when the vehicular volume reaches 220 I or more vehicles per hour. The proposed criteria awards 3 points for each hour the minimum Caltrans volumes are met. This minimum is 500 vehicles per hour total for all approaches and a combined vehicular and pedestrian volume of 200 units from the minor street approach. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street exceeds 35 miles per hour within a residence district as defined by section 515 CVC, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 per cent of the above requirements. The volume matrix was modified to include sub totals to help differentiate between the major and minor approach volumes. It should be noted that if the minimum volumes are met for the eight hours, the intersection warrants all-way stop control even though this criteria generates a maximum of 24 points, which is less than the required 35 points. 5 Traffic Volume Difference The maximum number of points for this criteria was left at 10 points and is relatively less important than the other criteria used in this evaluation. However, for "T" intersections, the method of calculating the ratio of the volume on the minor street approach to the volume on the major street approach was modified. The new method calculates the percent to be the ratio of the minor street approach volume to the highest single leg approach volume on the major street multiplied by one hundred. Other changes to the point system are summarized as follows: A. The total points possible was increased from 54 points to 100 points. B. The number of points needed for justification of an all-way stop control was increased from 30 points to 35 points. C. Three situations were identified which may modify the normal application of the point system; Case 1. If the Caltrans criteria is met (traffic signal is eminent, 5 or more accidents in a 12 month period, or at least 500 vehicles per hour for 8 hours) the point system C¡~.3 - Page 4, Item q Meeting Date 07/27/99 is not applicable. As identified above, this situation is a part of the current policy and is, therefore, not a change. Case 2. Ifany of the following five criteria is met to the extent of 100%, an all-way stop control intersection may be warranted even though the minimum number of points is not accumulated: (I) Accident History-25 points, (2) Unusual Conditions-21 points, (3) Pedestrian Volume-20 points, (4) Minimum Traffic Volume-24 points, (5) Traffic Volume Difference-lO points. Case 3. If the four following specific conditions are met, the location will receive a bonus of 10 points: (a) The street to be controlled is within a residence district as defined in Section 515 of the California Vehicle Code, and (b) The street to be controlled is classified a collector or is functioning as a collector, and (c) The subject intersection is not within 600 feet ITom the nearest controlled intersection along the collector, and (d) There is a parallel arterial highway that can be used as an alternate route. FISCAL IMP ACT: The proposed all-way stop control policy, if adopted by the City Council, will have both adverse and positive financial impacts. The proposed policy is more liberal than the existing policy in assessing the need for all-way stop control and, consequently, will result in the installation and maintenance of more stop signs and pavement markings. In addition, there will be an increased cost to the public as a result of increased use of energy and time and a reduction in air quality. However, all- way stop control intersections generally have a lower accident rate than uncontrolled intersections or two-way stop control intersections. Increased traffic safety, particularly for pedestrians and bicyclists, does come with a price tag which is generally acceptable to a majority of the driving, bicycling and walking public. Attachments: Attachment 1 - List of intersections previously studied. Attachment 2 - Existing Policy Number 478-03 All-Way Stop. Attachment 3 - Proposed Policy Number 478-03 All-Way Stop. Attachment 4 - Safety Commission Minutes of May 13, 1999 (Excerpt) H:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDAIALLW A Y2.RRL 9-'1 - .... _m RESOLUTION NO. /9S'lt¡ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING A REVISED CITY COUNCIL POLICY, NUMBER 478-03, ALL WAY STOP WHEREAS, Council directed that staff and the Safety Commission review the current system of warrant criteria for stop signs or other traffic controls and examine a more flexible, hybrid approach; and WHEREAS, staff has reported that numerous requests for all-way stops along East "J" Street have been investigated, but none of the locations meet the Council Policy on All-Way Stops currently in use; and WHEREAS, Council directed staff to review the current system of warrants and return with a revised policy; and WHEREAS, such a hybrid approach could allow for evaluation of objective criteria, traffic concerns and the informed judgment of the staff and committee members; and WHEREAS, the Safety Commission, at its May 13, 1999 meeting, voted to accept staff's report which recommends changes to the existing Policy Number 478-03, dated April 23, 1991 and adopted by Council Resolution No. 16147. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby adopted a revised City Council Policy Number 478-03, All-Way Stop as set forth in Attachment 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt, Director of y Public Works H;\home\attorney\reso\allway.pol 9-5 - Attachment 1 L'\lER5ECTIO~S PRE\l01..' SL Y STCDIES fiC] FOR ALL-WAY STOP L'\STALL~TIO~ 4i5.'99 UNDER m..TD=:R EXISTING PROPOS=:D INTERSECTION INSTALLED POLICY (1) POLICY (1) 54 POINTS 100 POIKTS TOT.A.l. TOTAL I I. Ran~ho Del Rey Pl.."W)' &. Del Rey Boulevard 1 No 12 \36 (2) I 2. Ran~ho Del R::y Pl..-v.'Y &. Terra Nova Drive , I ] 8 \53 I No (2) I 3. Ran::ho Del R::y Pl.."W)' &. Camino Bis::ay ¡No 117 136 (2) I 4. Ran~ho Del Rey Pl..'W)' &. A veniàa Del R::y I No \ 20 1°) (2) I 0_ I I 5. Ran::ho Del Rey Pkwy &. Ridgeba::k Road I Yes 128 166 I ¡ 6. :: ?<! ] Sueet &. Cassia Pia::e iN 18 I ! ! . 0 12] i , i 15 I , i 7. J _.." Nova Drive &. Plaza D::! Ciò i 'Yes I "'"I"::: 1__' , , , . I 8. Eastlak:: Pkwy &. Gr::ensgate Drive I Yes I J5 168 , I I 9. Cuyamaca A venm: & Inkopah Stre::t INo 19 \17 10. Melrose Avenue & Spruce Stre::t ¡No \8 .' 113 11. East Palomar SIre::! & Monscrate Avenue ¡No 17 I'" --' 12. Hidden Vista Drive & Winòrose Way I Yes 116 130 113. Hidden Vista Drive &. Woodhouse A venue 1 Yes 112 \35 I ]4. Broadway &. Flower S=et 1 Signal 122 168 I 115. Crest Drive &. Douglas Sueet I No \13 135 (2) I I 1 6. Melrose A venue &. East Oxford S=et I No 120 13ì i (2) I ] 7. East] Sueet &. Lo~i Lane I No 114 142 (2) I I j 8. Lane Avenue &. FenIon Street I" 111 137 I 1.0 (::) , I No [14 13ì 119. ()¡¡¡y Valley Road &.Paim Avenue (2) . 120. Lane Avenue &. Boswell Roaò I No 14 \26 I , I - M.-'\ Y BE INSTALLED UNDER NEW POUCY (I) Minimum points needed to qua1ify for an all-way stop is 30 points under existing policy and is 35 points under proposed policy. (2) Qualifies for an all-way stop based on proDoseò ¡JoEcy. HOME\ENGIN''''R\TRAFFlClMAJESTUDY99.MJD / _._----~~..- ...~__..... .""" III r'Wll I n ILl. I I T'\A~ nA ..,.., n., This page blank ;¿ --- ----,.._-- Attachment 2 EXISTING POLICY COù""NCIL POLJC"!' CITY 0::= C:·-11.)LA.. V1ST..;. POUCY I . SUBJECT: .l;!)....Wl-.Y STO? &:1- .!:.CTJ\=: I , , - NUMBER DAr.... PAGE , , I I I I 478-03 04- z:;: 91 1 OF 9 ADO:Y 1:1:::.1.) BY: ResDJu!ÌDD ND. 16147 - ..-. 1 DATED: 04-23-91 BACKGRDUND Tn~ CalT:-æ:s T~c Manuël and th~ Manuël on U:ilio:m T~: Contro] Dmc~ list c:rit~-ia i,J d~t~-mi:ring th~ n~d for an all-way stop. Actual n~d fo= an all-v.-ay is d~teImIDed by an mg1n"",--ing s::uåy wruch ~mes th~ ~cia1 ch~-ac:œ=isrics of the sit~ ':-'ll-v.."a)' stop sigr:s" are ve..T)" r-..stricrive controls SÌ:1::~ they require .all moto~..s:::s ~œring the i..J.l~"'"Se=:iDD to stop a:: all ::i!!l~. Wn~ stOp sigTIS ~ ir..stall.ed for ~eå conrro] aDå/Dr there is :¡¡o appu~t üaffic T2Son for the stcp r1t:zle or no WO~ '::"E.ffic), mOlo:-is!s regard !he stop sign 2S ZD un.."1ec:~a.."')· jmpeãim~! z....,ci a:r~ ::i:n~ åc no! -~i.:e Z cC:!lpietE stop. Wnen!his DCru::s me ü1>ec¡ario~ oÍ oth~ ci."iv~~ and peci~z..~ 2:"e altered, ~~eby j~DpZ: -;"'~g Lf)E saÍety pe...;o::m~.,ce of me Dte..-secrion. .AJthough speerls vâl1 be low~ in:he vi:ini:y of -me stop. ~eè.s will be rugh~ midblock Z5 :nOlc:iST..5 t')' TO makeup for :be rime lcS! at tb~ ~"1v..·2.0."'Ta-'l'J.t~d s:op si~ .b..=106~ n.~gariv~ 2.Sp~=t of u.'l'J.Wa17z..."'lt~c! stop sigr"-5 is t.~~ incr~2.S~ iD nois~ anè ?oliu:io:: 2.5 V~i-¡i::1~ , 2.??!y 'L~~ D:-cl~~ IO SlOW åoV\"TI z..,d a::~d~-a¡~ 0::: of :h~ i...,t~!:aiO:<1. ]¡ is jmp.-arn::aJ and impossiliJe to ~ an all-...."Y SIO (or other =ñic con=l device such as a =ñic signal) whenever anà 'Wherever a request is made; Dth~'is~ åu.-mg p-..ak ~oès, exœnded à~ays to m.oto:is!s may r-...sult, 'IÌnlS fDIcing motorists to seek alt~te ~ 1:hrough parallds streø-!S, Q,¡.;:en a resiàentia1 aT&. .... Tr2fÏic Engjn='s primary goal is to mainrain szfery and reduc~ vehicle delay. .' PURPOS=: Tn!: pu..,",?cse of;¡: fuliy jusrifi~d, prop~}y i..~s:alled all~way stop :s to eñect:ive.Ìy zssign righ!-of-v;2Y, rnzmtain s2Í~ty a....,d !'~ë:J=e v~~c1e ci~2Y. ~n~:-al:y, 2ll-wzy stops are i.~alled v-'Ì1~e =ziÏic: sigTIili 2:"e w2--:ë..."'l~ed 2IlriloT Z!l accici~"'1¡ history ~as be~"1 Lïåi::ated :,y rep0:Led acc:iå~!S oÍ a ~'Pe susc:ep:ibl~ to co::-e::io:J by 2!l 2l1-wzy stop. I ?O!.JCY ST.'>:,::..l£'" I I it ~2.ll be me pOlley oÍ ¡he Dry of Chu1a \ÏlS:2., :!L-o'!.!gn r.r:.e De?2-'"::IDmr oÍ P"ù.blic: Worj:s/E.r!gi.:.'"}e~"';""'g :rÎ\~ion, I to v..ëi!-~t :he i.-:s:zllarion of .lIJl-WZ)! Stops in ac:cor¿~ïc:e wvi:.' ~Ì1~ ÍOnO\o\-L.îg poìi::y s¡aH~:n~-¡:s: I 7:,e C21ifo:TIia Ve...."-J.ic:Je Code, S~Ct:iD::! 2:250 ~~îJ 21355, giV5 :h~ z:J:hori:y :0 Jo::~l 2ge...,:i~s to i.~s7ëll all-V:2)' stop ::-E.:.":1: c:o:¡::-ols ::?D;j s~~~:s 1."1 ~,~i: :-e:S?~:::::~Vt I I n~..-isii=:io!1. I ¡ . , I I A.cco:1iing 10 Feåe...-al arJå S:ate uaffic con:;ol guiàeliJleS, all~\\."'Zy SIOp ir.s:2l1atio::.s should I i I b~ =-~~-ved for me con~ol of vehicular ::-2.ffic: confli::s at inre..-sec:io~ 2I1d shDuld no!: I be used as à~vjc~ to C0:::1:1"01 speed. I I I I I ! I I :3 , I I COUNClL POLJCY \ CITY OF GiuL'; \ 1STA ! .....i ! SlJ""3JECT: .t.2J-.V,,·J.~:· SJO? i POUCY \ EFFECTIVE I I I ~'1JMBER DATE I PAGE i , I I I 478-03 04-23-91 I 2 OF 9 . I I ADO.t'lt"l} BY: ResoJutiDD No. 16147 I DATED: 04-23-91 Tn~ Ciry's policy for rh~ insralIarion of an alI-v.-zy stop conrrol is bas~d on z pomt system. Pomts zre zssign~d to rrzffic factors bas~d on rh~ s~v~"¡!)' of rrzffic conditions. Faao:s mezsur~d~: I I 1. acc:id= records 2- unusuzJ conditions i I 3. p~desrrian volum~ 1 I ..;. nafDc volUID~ üafñc vo!um~ differentials : _. , i I r- oo. .' . I I I I I I i i I ì 1 , r COu:-¡Cn.. POlJCY cm' 0::= G-fL"LA. \1STA SUBJECT: .A.!..l..V\'.L.Y S7C>? POUCY EFFECTl\'=: NUMBER DATE PAGE I 478-03 I 04-23-91 I 3 OF 9 ADOYll:JJ BY: RcsDJurion No. ]6147 . 1 DATED: 04-23-91 OTY o!' CHULA V1STA .'illrWAY STOP CO/IITRDL WA.?JLlJ>iïS , , Dat~: rr; ¡.=Y.s:::CTI OK To:a1 POD!S - MaJor S!T~tIW..Do: S:reet ( -DO) E~ -=-R..t¿: A 'fu.Dy j~~¿. PTO?~!Y i::s:aJJ.~d aD-way stop :zD ~~::riveÌ)' zssign :ighr of wzy, :r~óuc!: v~cl~ å~ay. anè ci.~=r£.a.s~ a::i::~"1~_ Ge.n~ëilly an 2..IJ-V.·ZY SID? is Tes~:-'V~d Íæ- th~ ~~ 2.1 :h~ i..."1!ers~=:io:1 of LWO rilrougr. ; ::igrrwa}'s. z..,ó. omy 2.S 2r! i."1I~"""izD. ¡:-affic ::Dü=-O~ ::!;~z..:;:JT!: p:-io: :0 Sig:¡:=i;-~:iD¡:. Stop sigTIS a:-~ nor to De us~ci ! io: sp~d. con-.-o1. ¡ 7ne posting of an inte...T'Secricn ÍOT alJ·,,;ay stop control ShD~d ~ based CD fa=rual è.a-œ.. V\:ar:z:'l!S to be I .. d' - . CODSloere mauae: 1_ Accident records .. 2- U=uaJ conditio!'..s , 3_ T.affic volumes i 4. T~c volume åi£Í~ence ! ". ?ed5::'ia."1 vollli"'!l!: ! ?oin:s 2:'!: 2Ss!gned to each of ü~ese V.tCL-;'2.;.""l:S. 7:1~ tD:a] P0L."1!S possible 2.:"e~. T:l!: i.~a-joD of z.n aJJ-V.ëy ! SIDp cO¡I::.-ol is .1:!sri.:.;eà wi!...;' :a miTÛm~~ of 30 ?O~:s. :mJt:Ss 2.."1)' on~ of m~ C2.17:-æ..~ c::i!~-i2 is :n~:' I , i , i AU.,..W.r..y STO? POI~ï SY~ j ~ C?JTE?JA: i - ACQD-:", WI...I\.R..A.-",: L I TWD ?:>i:1~ 2Te 2ssign!"d fo: ~:..r-¡ 2cció.~: s::.s:~p:ibl~ to :D:7~crio:) by 2.:l 2ll-v,,'2Y stop :oTI!:"Ol ciu..-i.'1.g O:-l~ f..ili y~z.r prior TO :"'":l~ i.,v~:iga¡jon è:ë.!~. To:æJ nU!Il.b~ of acc:ià~,ts co::-ec:ible by ël1-W2)' srop: - M2.ri:n:l:!l J. 4 points SeO?E: - Points 2- UNUSU..<¿ CONDiTION WA.=c;'....I...".,j: ¡ V\:'"n~~ U?~.,¡a.l conàitio::.s a.is!, suc."1 2S Z s~ool, iÏ:"e s:zrion, p12Ygrou.."1d, ~D:-=..zon¡z} or v~-¡j::a.l i 5 -- .....-... I COUNCIL POLJCY J CITY OF CHUL'; \'~STA SU3JECT: ~w!-.y s;:::>? , ?OLJC! I E1-ï=ECTIVE I I NUMBER DA TE : PAGE I 478-03 I 04-23-91 I 40F9 ADO.t" 1 ¡.oj) BY: R~D]utiDn No. 16147 I DATED: 04-23-91 curves, ett., points are assigned on the basis of mgin=."Ïng judgmmt. Unusual conditions shall ~ considered only if wirbÍD SOD feet of th~ subjea inters~aion. In residmriaJ neighbomoods where there is a concmtnrion of school ag~ children ac:rivities sepa:-¡¡ted from th~ residmrial neighbomood by a =on~ao~ stre~r and coupl<:d with oth~ conditions, :h~ Cirv Traffic :'n2in~r may apply traffic mgiD~..ring judgmmr anè waive the 3D-poinr minimum point requiremmt to qualiiy th~ inte....sec:rion for an all-v.-ay stop comrol. Tn~ 3D-point minimum requiremmr ~ be waived and an all-way stop ~ be i.."!S".aJled only ÌÍ less r~criv~ controls Ï12v~ ¡lOt c:o!T~cted a òocummted p:rDbl~m. Al]-Vw"zy stops ffiª-Y be j:.:sriiied bzsed on p:-ojea~d volum~ and a::-ciå~! fr-::quen:y v.·h~ tr2....."TIC signcis I are v..'-.-;z.'"1ted a-T1d will bt i.."".s¡alled within .a spe::ified p~-jDd oi tim~. I , M:::ry;......:.::n J.O pOLï.!S SCO~: - Poin~ ..- 3. ?=:DESTIU.-'IN VOLUMES Consid=rion is given to large numbers of ped~ans c::rossing the major street du.-ing th~ four busiest hou.'"S of an averag~ day. .' Ped~an Cross~ Maior Street. To",-l du:im.' 4 busiest =ffic hours . Volum~:· J.~50 52-100 102-250 J52-200 201-0V=R Pom.!S: 1 2 3 4 5 Max:m1J!D 5 POl."'1!.S SCO~: - ?oinrs '4. JR..L.??J C VOLUM"'::S ?OL'1:S ~e depe.'"1òen¡ UpO:.l me m2gni!Uàe of v~"'li::ular voj:1,¡~~ ~nte..-i.""lg :"'-1e int~-se=:jon ciu..-ing t..Ì1e Íou: ! I busiest nou...-s or an 2ve~ge ¿zy. I , I ~.. ~ I COL:-ICIL POLJCY I CITY 0:: C:-JL~A. VIST.';' I¡ SUBJECT: .~WAY STO? POUCY I Er-r.cCTIV::. Jo."UMBER DATE PAGE I I 478-03 I 04-23-91 15 OF 9 ADO.t'l totJ BY: ResDJutiDn ND. 16147 DATED: 04-23-91 Tnffic Counts (cird~ four rughesr hour voìum~): Hem 3.nciing AI: Dir D&OO 0700 DBDD 0900 ]000 DOD 1200 1300 ]400150016001700180019002000 )\<"3 53 i I !3 , I ViS 17 ïr<.ffic Vo]urn~ Warrant .. Pomts shall be zssigned m accoråance wi;±¡ the following rabJ= , Toral oÏ Major ïoral of Minor I I ~A..pproac:h !..~gs Ap?roach L~gs i LnDU!" VOiU..i·!'J~ ?oin:s Lr1Oill" Voh.!:!J.e Pob.:5 ! 0- ](KJO 0 o - 400 0 i 1001 - 1300 1 401 - 600 1 1 1301 - 1600 .2 601 - 800 2 i 160] - 1900 3 801 - 1000 3 I 1901 - 2200 . 1001 - 1200 L ; 2201 - 2500 5 1201 - 1400 5 I I 25a1 - 2900 . 1401 - }50D 5 29DJ. ~ 2208 3 1501 - }SaO - i I 3201 - 2500 2 1801 - 20aO 8 3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9 , I 3801 - DV~ 0 2201 - o"~C 10 I SCORE: - ?oi.'"l!5 SCO?2: - ?o~""1!S -M2Ximu:n 5 Mi-±l:.z::l 10 I j ! 1 I I - --"_._-- COuNCIL :POLlCY ] , CITY OF C:-fULA. \lSTA ¡ SL'3JECT: A!2.rW_L.Y STO? II' :POLlCY EJ-r-z::.CTIVE , NUMBER DAr.... ! PAGE I 478-U3 I 04-23-YJ I 6 OF Y I ADO.t'l:!::J..) BY: ResDJuuDn ND. 16147 I DATED: 04-23-91 5, TItAt-rJC VOLUME Dlrr::.RENCE AlJ-v.-ay stops op=r~ Ì>~sr whm th~ major a.'Jd minor SIr~r approach =!fic volum~ ar~ n~ariy ~quaJ. Poi.."lts shall Ì>~ assign~d in accordanc~ with th~ followir.g :abJ~: 24Hour Minor SL ADDroach VoJum~s 2¿...Hour Maior Sr. ADDroach Vo]um~s X 100% ~ ~ 95 - JOD JO , ~- ~ 9 I 75 - 84 B .- -, 7 I :::.:> - /-:- 55- ~ 5 ...- - ~ - '"õ':> - ':---; .J 25 - .:...; 4 25-34 3 J5 - .24 .2 5 ~ J.4 J o - 4 0 ,- SCORE: _ Points Maximum J 0 Points . C.Ll.TIL"'1\!S CRI~RlA (Chap;~r 4 CalT",,,s T,<o"'5, Man:.:al1 I .J~·_~y of me iolio~"Ïng conåitio!:S !:lay lh°a..-:-2-TJ! a mulri-wë!Y STOP si,5:) ÏI"'..s:allarion: I J. WD~e !:1aJÏic signals ar~ ",,,--ranted and urgenriy ne~d~d. th~ mulriway srop may Ì>~ a."l inre:i!D m=ur~ ::har can b~ ~.al]~d qui::kJy ro co::t:ro] =m, whiJ~ a.~"lgemmts ar~ being mad~ for th~ sjgnël ÌI"..stallarion. 2. An accid~t probl~. 25 inàjcat~d by five or more reportt'd a:ciden!S v.'i:.~n a 22 month pe...-:iod"of 2:ype sl~.sceprï!>le to cO:Tec::io::l by a muiriv..·ay SID? L"lS:aI12Do!'2.. 5u:::..~ accid~T).ts iJciuåe :-ighi~ 2...T1d 1~'7-:::""-n I ¡ coliisio-"'S as well as righ'-a."lgl~ co¡Esjo-"'S. I I 3. Mirllmum =IDc voJum"5 2. T!)~ taLa] vdlicu1z.r volume ent~-i.:g the inte:section fro:n all approaches must 2V~4:!ge at least 500 verucl~ p~ hour for any 8 ho:l.""S of an ave.."g~ day, and % I COü~CIL POLlCY CIT'r' 0::= C...:rL'1-.6,. V1STA . SU"BJECT: .L::2...W.L.Y 57:)? i POUCY : E:-'""""FECIT\S I I NUMBER I DATE I PAGE 1 I 47&-03 I 04-23.-91 17 OF 9 ADOY Hill BY: ResOJutiDD No. 16147 I DATED: 04-23.-91 D. Th~ combined v¿Uc:uJar and ~desrr'.an velum" from rb~ minor == or rughv.-ay must av=g" at ¡ 1= 200 units ~ hour for th" sam~ 8 bOUIS, wi:Ìl an av""'''g'' delëy to minor s=~"r v~\.¡jc:uJa:- ! üa5: of at l~2St 3D s~c:onås p~ Vehicif àu..."in~ the =2.XÍmum hOlr. bu: Co VI'h,,¡¡ th~ B5-p~~riJ~ approach ~d of rb" major street t:-affic ex~Cs 40 mi!~ p!'r no:.!", th~ !Ili:l!mum vclûc:ular vDlum~ v.."a..~'! is 70 p~c~t Df ':h~ above req1L.~~!S. ¡ , , .' .- t COU~CIL POUCY CITY 0::= C"nù"LA. VISTA = ::.UBJECT- !-:.J... "'LV -..,.-" POUCY -~~CTJ\T'""" I I 1:.J"" r 1:. .t:.. i _ ... . .~.. :::..v. I NUMBER , DATE I PAGE I I 478-03 I 04-23-~1 I 8 OF 9 I I ADO.t' J.:!:.!J BY: RcsD]uuDn No. 16147 I DATED: 04-23-91 !-J.J.-WAY STOP SUMMARY · ]I\"T=:RSECTJ ON: ( -08) DATE INV"""=.S11GA110N WI'S COMPLEl=:D: TOT.~ SCDR2 POl.'"1::5 au: of 2 po~sible 5~. 7~e :ni.~iInUI!l required to j:l!;:i.")' En 2.l)-Y,;2Y STOp can:rol is 30 poi.."1:s.. t I · ! L", =.?.s=:O ON DlAGP_ ·'JL I -. .' . · JGCOMME..IIID_"'TJ ON5: I , ! i · ?.:::w~A.RKS : /() · r COL,""NCIL POLlCY cm' 0::= CHL'L'; V1STA ~.cCT' L:.J...-W<V 570" I POUCY EFFEC1T\ - , .. ...... ... .t:. 1.::. ¡ I 1'o.'UMBER DATE I PAGE : I I I 19 OF 9 , 478-03 04-2.."'-91 I I DATED: 04-23-91 ADOy HID BY: R~D]utiDn No. 16147 OTY OF C...mL!>. V!ST!>. .Iill.-WAY STOP EV.~UATION WORKS:";==T , , ! Fil~ /lnr=eroon Dat~ (Major) (Minor) lDve:stigatoT"_ Qt¡al.i5~ ioI' .!J..:"\\:ay Stop pz.sed on 30 Dr rn07"e DOin!S: I '. . ! =.~ _ No _ Poi."1!5_ f ! Ql2liñ~ Ïo;- ..;1;-\\:.2)' Stop bz.sed cn o¡h~ cit~-i¡:: y~ - N~ ¡ 1£ y~, ~lz.i::.: I Sk"tch of mt="c::í:m wi;:.;' v;sïoiliry clara On back h""!ached 2- Aa:ide:m History' POIms Pass.ibl~ Prom / / to / / Accid=iyr correc:tab]" by Stops X 2 p!S/accid=t J4 I 12 Um~..,al ConåÏrioTIS ! JD I 3. Peåes¡:jan V01ume I Peà~...ë..:.~ 5 C"ossing 6~ major S::-~er à~-i~g 4 ho~ CD:.:..': ~. Tr.rlfic:: VoJ=~ (Peak 4 Ho,"--:;) Major 2?p;-cac.;'es 5 j ÞÆnor zp?:vaches }O , i , , ... Tr.rlfic V01um~ Diñer-..nc~ I :>. 20 I ¡ TOTAl. 54 I MÏnll:I1JIIl Poims Requ.ir~d 30 i ¡ , I 1 I - ~___m____.. · This page blank · · · /'/1 / ?é/ Attachment 3 PROPOSED POll CY FINAL DRAFT COC'\CIL POUCY I CITI' OF CHl'LA \ ìSTA , I I SLBJEŒ ..:...LL- V;..t.. Y STOP I POLICY I £FF£CTJ\T i ;-¡UMBER DATE PAGE I 478-03 I I ] OF 8 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. T DATED: BACKGROUND The CallI3IlS T~c Manual and the ManuaJ on Uniform Traffic Control Devices lis1 criteria in determining the ne~d for an all-way stop. Actual need for an aJl-way is determined by an engineering study which ~xamin~s the special d",ra:toristics oÎ th~ sit:::. All-way SlOp signs are very restrictive conn-cIs sinc~ they require all motorists entering the intersection to SlOp at all times. 'When stop signs are mstaJled for speed control andlor th= is no apparent naffic reason for the stop (little or no cross ttaffic). motorists regard the stop sign as an unnecessary impedimcnland oft~ times do not make a complete SlOp. \VbCD this occurs the ~xpecUltions of other cinvers and ped~strians ar~ altered, ther~by jeopardizing the safet)' p~rfo=c~ of the intersection. Although speeds wiD be lower in the vicinity of the stop, sp~~ds IrnIY be higher midblo:k as motorists t:'). 10 mak~up for the perceived time 1051 at the stop sign. A..nothernegarive aspect ofunv.rarrantcd stop signs is the mcre2.se in noise and pollution 2.S vehî:ì=s appìytheir brakes to slow åo\\'Il and accel~are out oÍthe int=rsccrion. Ho,,,,:ver. all-way stop conn-01 intersections , generaUy ha\"f~ 2. ¡ow::!" a:cid:::nt rate in contrast to uncontrolled interse::rions or two-stop conn-ol interse:::tions. 1: is imDra:ri:al:!.Dc m1Dossibì~ to insIa1l an aD-way srou (or oth:::¡ ~ffic comrol åe\"i:e such as a traffic sÜ:::na]) \vhen~ver and wherever a reques~ is maåe: otherváse during pe~ periods, ext~ded delays 10 motorists may resuìt. thus forcing i motoriStS to seek altanat~ routes through parallels s~ts. omn a residential area. A Traffic Engineer's prima.:: goa1 is to maintain saÏety and reduce vehicle delay. PURPOSE The pltIpose of a fuJly justified, properly installed all-way stop is to ~ffectively assign right-of-way, IrnIinmin saf~ty and reduc~ vehicle d~1ay, Generally, all-way stops ar~ installed where traffic signals are wammted andIor an accident history has b= indicated by reported accidents of a ,ype suscepn'ble to corroction by an all-way stop. POLICY STA1B1Th-r It sbalJ be tho policy of th~ Cny of Cnula Visu, through the Deparn:n~nt of Public WorksŒngineering Di\'ision. 10 warrant the installation of All-Way SlOpS in accordance ,,~th the foJlowing policy sUltoments: Tho California V~hicl~ Code, Section 21350 thru 21355. gives th~ authority to local ag~n:jes to insull all-way Stop traffic conn-oIs upon sueets in their respe:rive jurisdiction. Accoråmg to ¡:~deral and SUte traffi: conn-ol guidelines. all-way stop insUlJlations should be , rese:¡\'ed for the conn-01 of verucular t"affic conflIcts at intersections and shou]d not be used as åe\'1:es to control sDeed. , The City·s policy for th~ ins.-aJJa~on of an all-way Stop conn-ol is based on a point system. Points are assigned 10 n-affic I factOrs based on the severity of traffic conditions. Factors measured are: I. accident records 2. unusual condition -. pedestrian vo)ume I 4. rr:afiÏc volume , t:"aÎÍÏc volume differentials /3 I I ---. -...-.-. : COlJ:"CIL POLICY ! I CITY OF CHCLA \""ISTA I SCBJECT: t,LL- \\A Y STOP POLICY EFFECTI\""E I ~UMBER DATE PAGE I 478-03 I :2 OF 8 I_.<U>OPTED BY: Resolution No. I DATED: CITY OF CHULA VISTA ALL- WAY STOP CONTROL W ARRA}.'TS Dat~: INTERSECTION Total Points - Major Sn-~~t'Minor Sn-~~t ( -00) GENERAL: A fu1ly jusrifi~d, prop~rly insta1l~d all-way stop caD ~ff~:;tjv~Jy assign right of way, r~duce v~hicle d~lay, and d:cn:ase · accidems. Generally, an aU-way SlOp is r:servcd for the use at the iIu=rsecrion of two through highways, and only as an interim traffic control m:asurt' prior to signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed conuol. Tn: posùng of an intersection for alJ-way SlOp cODtrol should be based on Ía:::rual data. v.:arrants 10 be consiàered in::luà:: 1. A-c:::id:nt n::cords I 1 0 Unusual conàitions 1 , 3. P:à:st::"ian volum~ I , I 4. Traffic volume 5. Traffic voiume diff",.""nals · Points are assign~d to oach of th~s~ wammtS. The total points possible ar~ 100. The installation of an all-way stop conn-ol is justifi~d with a minimum of 35 points, unl~ss: .' Cas~ I: If th~ Calrrans crit~ria is m~t, th~ point syst:m is not applicabJ~. Case 2: If any of the five criteria is met to the extent of 100%, an all-way stop conn-oj intersection may be warranted even though me minimum number of points is not accumulated. û.s= 3: If the following conditions arc met: · (aj Th~ sn-~ot to b~ conn-oll~d is within a r~sid~nc~ åistrict as defmed in Section 515 ofth~ California Vehicie Coå~, and (b) Th~ Sn-~~T to be conn-oiled is classifi~d a collector or is functioning as a collector, and (c) The subject intersection is not within 600 fe::t irom the nearest conrrol1ed intersection along the colle:to!. and (d) Tner: is 2: parallel arterial highway that can :,: us:d as an alt:rnati\'e route, then Tne subject intersection shall receive a bonus of 10 poin!5_ · I~ I COl-:-;C¡L POLICY I c¡n· OF CHlL-A \"¡ST." , ! SCEJECT: _.t,,:.....:....\~:þ.y STOP , POLICY EFFECTI\T I I , I ~(jMBER DATE ! PAGE I I , 478-03 I 3 OF 8 I ADOPTED BY: Reso]ution No. I DATED: ALL- WA Y STOP PO!».ï SYSTEM CRITERlA: L ACCIDB.ï WARRA.NJ: Five points ar~ assigned for each accident susc~nb1e to correction by aD all-way stop conn-oj during any 12-month period prior to the investigation date. T oral number of acciåems correctible by aU~w.ay Stop: - Maximum 25 points SCORE: - Points , lT1\;"1'SUŒ CONDITIO" WARR'l.1\J: \V"h:r~ UDusual conditions exiSL such as a schooL fu:: station. playground. horizontal or v:::rri::al cu.""'"\'~s. e1C.. points are assigned on the basis of ~giD:ering judgm:::nt. UnusuaJ conãitions shall be conslå=red on]y if wi'Ù:1iD 500 feet of the subject intersection. 1D resià~tial neighborhoods where thae is a concentration of school age chilàn:n activities separated ûom the resid...-nrial ncighbomood by a collector street and couph:d with other conditions, rhe CiTy Engine,," or his design=<: may app1y traffic engineering judgment and waive rhe 35-point minimum point requirement to qua1:i:fy the inœrsectioD for aD all-way stop control. The 35-point mm;mnm requirement!lli!.Y be waiv~d and an all-way stop !lli!.Y be installed only if less restrictive conn-ols have not corrected a docum~nlCd prob1cm. .' - - ! Allcv.'aY stOpS!lli!.Y be justifi~d1>as"d on projected volumes and accident frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed 'I\~thin a specified period of rime. L1'.'USVAl.. CONDm01\'S POJ:!.,ïS 1. Adjac~t to schooL ÍITe station, playgroun¿' s:I1Îor cemer, amus~ent park. etc. -; 1. Horizontal aDd/or vemcaJ curves which result m limited Stopping sight distance. " , .. .A...n intersection leaãing to all anerial from an interior(circular) collector. , Intersections with steep grades on at leZ51 one approach. - ... 5. Intersection is OD "Suggested Route To S:booJ" and DO other conn-aBed crossing is located .., within 600 feet. 6. Higb approach speeàs. ï Maximum 21 points SCORE: /5 ~...._._- --_.__.--~--- -- - ---.-.- , COL':\CIL POLlCY I CITY OF CHeLA \ lSTA SCBJECT: ALL· WAY STOP POLICY EFFECTI\'E i i I :\UMBER DATE I PAGE I 478-03 I .4 OF 8 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. I DATED: 3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES Consid~ralion is given to larg~ numb~rs of p~d~trians crossing th~ major street during busiest pedestrian hour of an averagr àay. Ped~strian~ Crossjn~ Maior S!Teet. Total durin!! the neak traffic hour \'oluxnes: 1- 19 ::>0-::>9 30-39 4G-49 50-OVER Points: , 8 . , 16 ::>0 I - 1_ Maximum 20 points SCORE: - POInts , TR.o..ITIC Y011'MES I _. , · Points are œpend~nl upon Ù1~ magni1Ud~ of v~hicular volum~s ~nr::ring Ù1e iIJt~rsecrion during Ù1~ eight busiest bours oÎ an average day. Trafii:: Counts (circle eight highest hour vo]uxnes): Hour Ending At: .' Dír 06000700U800 09001000] ]00 1::>00 1300 ]400 1500 ]600 1700 J800 19002000 TOTAL NB SB · S1..:BTOTAL E3 WB SUBTOTAL TOTAL · 1n resid~nc~ disnim as d~fm~d by S~crion 5]5 Cye, ìfÙ1< 85"' percenrij< approach speed ofth< major str~et exceeds 35 miles per hour. the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70% of the above requirements. II /6 I COl-:-;CIL POLlCY . CITY OF CHL"LA \""lSTA I : I I' ! SL"BJECT: .'-.LL-\\·AY STOP I P?L1CY II EFFECTIH I I I ~u~ffiER DATE i PAGE , I 478-03 I I 5 OF 8 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. I DATED: 5. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE All-way stops operate best when the major and minor srre~t approach traffic volumes are nearly equal. Poiots shall be ¡u;si<!Ded in accordance with the fol1ov.w. table: ,- - *24-Hour Minor 51. Auuroach Volumes -24-HoUT Maior St. AunToacb Volumes x I(X'!",."' Points 95-100 ]0 85 ~ 94 9 75 - ~4 8 65 - ï4 : 5 - (>4 6 .:15 - :'4 5 ~.:; 1" . -- - ..,...., ~ 25 - ~4 ~ 15 - 24 2: 5 - J4 1 0- 4 0 SCORE: _ Points Maximum] 0 Points -For T-intersections, the percent is the ratio ofth~ minor stre~t approach volume to the highest single leg approach volume OD the major meet multiplied by one hunåred. I I /7 .-. -..."----.-.."--- \, COC;\CIL POLK) I CIn' OF CHCLA \""lSTA , I SCBJECT: ALL-WAY STOP POLl CY EFFECT!\ T : ;\UMBER DATE i PAGE , I 478-03 I i 60F 8 ADOPTED BY: Rcsolution No. I DATED: CAL TRANS CRITERIA (Chapter 4 CalTrans Traffic Manual) .'u1y of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation: L Where traffic signals ar~ warrant~d and urgently ne~ded, th~ multiway stop IIUl)' be an interim measure that can be installed quickJy to control traffIC wrule arrangoments an: being mad~ for th~ signal installation. I " An accident problem. as indicated by ñve or more reponed accidents within a 11 month period of a type susceptible ¡- to correction by a multiway Stop installation. Such accidents include right- and l~ftprurn col1isions 2.S well as · righ1-angk collisions. I i i 0 Minimum tiaffi: vojum~s i _. r- i i I a. Tn~ total v~hicular voiume entering the int:rs~::tiOI1 from all approaches mus! ::!v::¡-age at leõlst 500 vchides per hour iar ,my 8 hours of an a\'~ge day, anà ì I b. Tne combined vehJcular and pedesnian volwne from the minor meet or hIghway must average at least 200 urn" '. per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street v~hicular traffic of at least 30 seconds p vehicle during the maximum hour, but · c. When the 85-percenrile approach speed of the major str""t traffic exc""ds 40 miJes per hour, the minimum v~hicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirom~nts. · I , , I , I · /6 COl""~CIL POLICY I CITY Of CHl""LA. \ lSTA. , ¡ SL"BJECT: ALL-WAY STOP POLICY EFFECTr\ T i I !\UMBER DATE I PAGE I 478-03 I 7 OF 8 I I ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. I DATED: ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY I!\lERSECTION: (Major) (Minor) DATE I!\\'"ESTIGATI01\ WAS COMPLETED: TOTAL SCORE: points out oÍ a possibl~ 1 00. Th~ minimum required to justify an aU-way Stop CODtTol is 35 pomts. , I!\lERSECTIO" DL4GRAM: .' - ~- - RECO~""DATIONS: , I , I REMiùUC.5: If .. I - I COP,ClL J'OLJCY I CI1T Of CHrL... \'151" I I ~n;JECT: .......:....:...._\I...t..y STOP ! PO LI CY , EFFECTI\T , I ~lJMBER i DATE , PAGE I I ¡ I I I I 478-03 ! S OF S i I DATED: I A.DOPTED BY: Resolution No. CITY OF CHUL.. VISTA ALL- WAY STOP EV ALVA TION WORKSHEET Fil< lnl=:se:crion Dau: (Major) (Minor) Inv~stigalor_ Qualifies jar All-Way SlOp basod on 35 or mor< POinlS: Yos - No - Points - Qualifi~s Íor A1]- 'Way SlOp based on other criteria: Yos - 1\0 - I I lî yo,. oxplam: I I , I Sketch oi intersection with visibility dala I , Or. ba:k A[T..a:Ì1:d I . - L Accident History Points Possible From , , .I to .I / Accidentsiyr correctabl< by Stops X 5 pIS/accident Max. .' - 25 , Unusual Conditions ] ï DOmts 4 Îuoims ? 7 Doints 5 ï Domts 3 7 Doinrs 6 7 Doims - 21 3. Pedestrian Volume Pedestrians - 20 crossing the major street during the peak hour , Minimum Traffic Y olumes ~. !-Jumber of hours x 3 points per hour when minimum t"af1Ïc "olum:- reached " I - -~ 5. Traffic Volum< Difference - ]0 TOTAL - 100 J\.1inimum Points Required 35 . H:úiOME\ENGINEER'.~DMIN'~LLSTOP3.FIN (wp8) II /)0 0- Attachment 4 EXCERPT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION Thursday, May 13, 1999 Council Chambers 7:05 p.m. Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Present: Chair Liken; Vice Chair McAlister; Commissioners Acton, Cochrane, Gove, and Lopez Absent: None Also present: Ralph Leyva, Senior Civil Engineer; Sg!. Richard Coulson; and Florence Pic:ardal, Recording Secretary MSC (liken/McAlister) to excuse the absence of Commissioner Acton (Commissioner Acton informed the Commission at last month's meeting that she would be unable to attend). (5-0-1, Acton absent) 2. Pledae of AlleaiancelSilent Praver 3. Ooenina Statement - Opening statement was waived by Chair Liken. Chair Liken welcomed and introduced new Commissioner Jose Lopez. 4. Aaaraval of Minutes MSC (McAlister/Gave) to approve minutes of April 8, 1999 as submitted. (4-0-1-1, Acton absent, Lopez abstain) ~_. MEETING AGENDA 5. Oral Communications There were no oral communications. 6. Reaort on Revisions to the AII-Wav Stoa Policv Mr. Leyva presented the report. Staff Recommendation: That the Safety Commission accept staff's report which recommends changes to the existing Policy Number 478-03, dated April 23, 1991, and adopted by Council Resolution No. 16147. Commission Discussion: Commissioner Cochrane asked for clarification of Item #2 under Discussion re9arding items being referred to Council. Mr. Leyva responded. Mr. Leyva stated there are a number of requests that have been received in the past, and asked if all the requests should be brought up (after approval of new policy) at the same time or one at a time. Chair Liken stated that the slow approach would be preferable and would leave it to staff's discretion as to tiow to proceed. Commissioner Cochrane stated that the policy was well thought out and did not need anymore improvement and this new policy would enhance and improve traffic safety in the City. Commissioner ;2/ - _.n_ Safety Commission Minutes May 13, 1999 Page 2 McAlister asked about EastLake ParkwaylGreensgate. Mr. Leyva responded. Me. Lopez asked about the timetable for the requests. Me. Leyva responded. ChaIr Liken commended staff on the revisions to the policy. MSC (Liken/Lopez) to accept staffs report and forward the report to City Council. (5-0-1, Acton absent) STAFF REPORTS Before going to the Action Summary, Me. Leyva wanted to go back to the second page of last month's minutes (Commissioner Comments), Traffic counters on COITal Canyon Road - Me. Leyva stated he was mistaken and the traffic counters were the City's. Telegraph Canyon Road Project - This is scheduled to go to City Council on June 8. Coors Amphitheatre Traffic - Staff has been meeting on a regular basis regarding this item. Sg!. Coulson gave a brief summary of the traffic conditions during the concerts. Intersection of FourthlParkway - There used to be a marked crosswalk at that location, but was taken ou!. The City will conduct a pedestrian study in the near future. Hunte Parkway/Dtay Lakes Road - The traffic count was conducted. That location will be added to the all- way stop evaluation lis!. 7. Action Summarv Uodate/Staff Comments Me. Leyva presented the Summary Update. 8. Traffic Accident Summarv . December 1998 Sgt. Coulson stated that the accident summary is correct, but the citations may not be because those stats are received from the County. Report was accepted into record. OTHER BUSINESS ~,- - - 9. Commissioner Comments Commissioner Cochrane commended Sg!. Coulson and the Traffic Unit on their aggressive pursuit of law and order on City streets. He commended Officer Ferko on bringing law and order to the Southwestern College area. He also commended the Civil Engineering staff. Chair Liken asked about the condition of the City's traffic signal computer system. Mr. Leyva responded that the City currently has two projects: 1) demonstration project for 10 intersections in the vicinity of Southwestem College to install an Adaptive Signal System, and 2) repiacement of existing traffic signal computer with a new PC-based, QuickNet 4 system. Chair Liken asked if there is a tentative date the AJI-Way Stop Policy would go to Council. Mr. Leyva responded the target date would be July 13. Chair Liken requested that a final draft of the report be sent to the Commission before Council submittal. Commissioner Gove stated she will be on vacation for the June 10th meeting. Sg!. Coulson thanked Commissioner Cochrane for his accolades. Sg!. Coulson stated that the Police Department will be participating in the Buckle-Up America Program the week of May 24th. The Traffic Unit is looking into the photo red-light cameras. ;2:2 . , I know no .~t. dlpolitory of the ultt..te powarl of July 16, 1999 the loctety but the plopl. th....lv..' end If WI think th.. not enl19htened enouqh to e.erct.. their control with. whol"olll' dtlcretlon. the r_edy ts not to tlk. It 11'0' th.. but to IntoI" their dtlcrlUon. Th~" Jefferlon Sept"Mr 18.. 1 120 409 Palm Ave., Suite 100, Imperial Beach, CA 91932-1121 Tel: (619)429 7946 . 1/'¡lllff¡ ".> MEMORANDUM #:oOlÞri'o' TO: . /' ~aR 9is!B CSYRty ~eaF~ sf (1) ~up9r··!sers 3Rd Air PellytiÐR GeRtFel Bi8Erie~ Bearà ~San DiegD city Council ~hula Vista City Council FROM: William E. Claycomb, President SUBJECT: Gasoline Prices, Solar Panels, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells We still hear screeching from~supervisDrs about high gasDline prices. When we presented our seven page fuel cell paper (plus one page bibliography) to ~ on May 11th, Supervisor Roberts, compelled to make a speech, among other things, said: 1. " in fact, in SacramentD, there's now a small fleet of fuel-cell vehicles operating. _ __ II and 2. II at least some of us whD have thDse assignments are, I think, - fully up to speed on what's going on in uh certainly in this state II - -- We have checked with Ms. Analisa Bevan, Manager, Zero Emissions Vehicle Implementation Section, Ms. catherine Lentz, Staff Air Pollution Specialist, also of that SectiDn, and M. Jose Gomez, Air Resources Engineer, all with the California Air Resources Board in SacramentD. We also checked with M. Tom Swenson, Program CDordinatDr, Mobile Source Division, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District. All of the above responsible professionals assured us that not P{ Dnly is there NOT a fleet of fuel cell vehicles in Sacramento, there is not even ONE. Supervisor Roberts' ye1:1F brash unfounded, shoot-from-the-hip statements quoted above fall among the reasons why people have VJ~~ Á4-fJ~ ßc;j 76 7/91. ~ I:O~ \'?L- - --_.,----_.~_. -2- , lost faith in their governments and become dangerously cynical. ~ 4'm$,sll . . But can redeem "S Fee t!. As ah.JDember of the County A~r Pollution Control District Board ;'eti- can collectH ~e~econd authorized $2.00 for each vehicle in the County. -¥J t'U' then spend this money to begin installing solar panels (silicon cell photovoltaic sunlight to electricity converters) to produce the electricity needed to produce hydrogen for fuel cell vehicles which won't need gasDline. He{t-J,'!:Ì2 ~could also get authority to collect a two cents per gallDn San Diego County gasoline tax to be used for the same purpose. That would begin to put the oil companies where they belong, left behind in the 20th Century. . ~ 7/....'/f.9~ Our gasoline price went up cen s per gallOn~ing the last tWD months. The Dil companies will squawk at two cents d tax but the public won't if yea 8Jrplaia its purpose ...4:SeJtflA.;....e . (~a , COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 10 Meeting Date 7/27/99 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing -Waiving irregularities in the bid of Knox Electric, Inc., for the installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVPE) System along Fourth A venue Corridor in the City of Chula Vista Resolution I q 5Lfg Making a specific finding that irregularities in the bid of Knox Electric, Inc. are waived for the benefit ofthe public; accepting bids and awarding contract to Knox Electric, Inc. for the installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVPE) System along Fourth Avenue Corridor in the City ofChula Vista (TF261) ; and transferring $40,000 in remaining Traffic Signal Fund appropriations from the completed Broadway and Flower Street Traffic Signal CIP for construction of the project. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes...x......No-J .-, On June 23, 1999, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids from five (5) electrical contractors for the installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVPE) System along Fourth Avenue corridor. A low bid of$118,605 was received from Knox Electric, Inc. This bid contained some minor irregularities which are insubstantial in nature and which do not affect the bid price. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Council hold the public hearing to take testimony regarding waiving irregularities contained in the bid of Knox Electric, Inc., 2. That Council approve the resolution making a specific finding that irregularities contained in the bid of Knox Electric, Inc. are waived for the benefit of the public, accepting bids, awarding contract to Knox Electric, Inc., for the installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVPE) System along Fourth Avenue corridor (TF261), and transferring $40,000 in remaining Traffic Signal Fund appropriations from the completed Broadway and Flower Street Traffic Signal CIP (TF257) for construction ofthe project. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. /Ó -I --~_..__.- --_.._._---_.~-----_.__._--------------._. Page 2, Item /0 Meeting Date 7/27/99 DISCUSSION: On June 23, 1999, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids from five (5) electrical contractors for CIP Project No. TF261 - InstalJation of Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVPE) System along Fourth Avenue Corridor. The thirteen (13) existing signalized intersections to be upgraded are as folJows: Fourth Ave. and C St. Fourth Ave. and K St. Fourth Ave. and D St. Fourth Ave. and L St. Fourth Ave. and ESt. Fourth Ave. and Moss St. Fourth Ave. and F St. Fourth Ave. and Palomar St. Fourth Ave. and G St. Fourth Ave. and Anita St. Fourth Ave. and 1St. Fourth Ave. and Main St. Fourth Ave. and J St. This project was approved and funded in the City's 1998-99 Capital Improvement Program. The work to be done includes the installation of new mast-arm mounted EVPE detectors, discriminator modules (phase selectors), traffic signal cabinets (at five locations), meter pedestals (at two locations), and other miscelJaneous signal equipment necessary to make the EVPE system operational. The bids received were as folJows: Contractor Bid Amount 1. Knox Electric, Inc. - Spring ValJey $118,605 2. Peek Signal Maintenance, Inc. - Santee $138,950 3. Trasig Corp. - Bonita $139,400 4. T & M Electric, Inc. dba Perry Electric - $142,650 5. DBX, Inc. - Temecula $147,852 The low bid of $118,605 for the project was received from Knox Electric, Incorporated. This low bid is $20,345 below the second lowest bidder and is below the Engineer's estimate of$135,000 by approximately 13.82%. The Engineer's estimate was based on bid prices from previously awarded City traffic signal projects. The low bid from Knox Electric, Inc. contains some minor irregularities in that the bid proposal omitted the unit prices written in words and omitted the lump sum prices written in numbers. These omissions on the bid proposal do not affect the bid price. Furthennore, the bid as submitted was clear and unambiguous. As such, the omission of such items did not provide Knox Electric, Inc., 10-'). __________'u__.. -.,-....-- -----,- -_.~.__._.__..__..- --_._-- Page 3, Item /0 Meeting Date 7/27/99 with any unfair advantage. It appears that these omissions are a minor irregularity in filling out the bid proposal and do not appear to be the vehicle for any type of favoritism. Furthermore, the failure to provide the omitted information does not affect the ability to make bid comparisons. The City of Chula Vista City Charter at Section 1009 provides that public works projects shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder who's bid is determined to be, in all respects, most advantageous to the public interest. Section 1009 of the Charter also provides that the City Council may waive any defects in the bid to the extent that it finds at a public hearing held for that purpose that it is necessary to do so for the benefit of the public. Therefore, pursuant to the authority provided under the City Charter, Council may make a specific finding that such irregularities are waived for the benefit of the public, and may proceed to award the contract to the low bid contractor, Knox Electric, Inc. for this project. Knox Electric, Inc. has completed several projects for the City in the past with favorable performance. Knox Electric, Inc. has met all City requirements for award of contract as set forth in the bid document The total cost for this project is estimated at $196,000 which includes the $118,605 contract amount, $17,545 for 5 controller cabinets, $6,020 for equipment to test existing and proposed EVPE installations, $17,790 for contingencies, $24,500 in staff costs, and $11,540 for inspection and contract administration. The approved CIP budget (TF261) for this project is $156,000. The original estimate for this project, however, did not take into consideration the age of the existing signal equipment in the field or the resulting need to upgrade some ofthis equipment in order for the EVPE installations to function correctly. Due to these factors, it was necessary to purchase additional equipment (controller cabinets and EVPE test equipment) and to expend additional funds in staff time for design and field investigations prior to bidding the project. Therefore, due to these expenditures, there are insufficient funds remaining in the CIP for the construction of the project. In order to proceed with construction, an additional $40,000 needs to be transferred to this project; these Traffic Signal funds are available in the completed Broadway and Flower Street Traffic Signal CIP (TF257). The Broadway/Flower St. Traffic Signal project was budgeted originally at $160,000 of Traffic Signal funds. When the contract was awarded, it was estimated that apporximately $112,000 would actually be required for the total construction costs including the contract amount, staff time, purchase of City furnished signal equipment and contingencies. The project has been completed; but has not been officially closed out. A total of$108,873.42 was spent from this project leaving an unencumbered balance of$51,126.58 (as ofJune 30, 1999). Staff recommends that $40,000 be transferred from the unencumbered balance. The source of funding for this project is the Traffic Signal Fund. The contract will be let on the City's standard Public Works Contract form. The final form of the contract will be approved by the City Attorney. 10-3 Page 4, Item /j Meeting Date 7/27/99 FISCAL IMPACT: Funds Required for Construction A. Contract Amount $118,605 B. Controller Cabinets 17,575 C. EVPE Test Equipment 6,020 D. Contingencies (approx. 15%) 17,790 E. Staff costs (design/field) 24,500 F. Inspection/Contract Administration 11,540 TOTAL $196,000 Funds Available for Construction A. Traffic Signal Fund - 22500-7999/24592610 (TF261) $156,000 B. Traffic Signal Fund - 22500/7999/24592570 (TF257) 40,000 (Fund Transfer) TOTAL $196,000 There is no additional annual maintenance or energy cost associated with this project over and above what is currently being paid. Attachments: Exhibit A - Contractor's Disclosure Statement File No: 0735-1O-TF261 H:\HOME\ENGlNEER\AGENDA \SMTF261. WPD July 21, 1999 (2:38pm) 10-1 -~- -------,-. -.,-.--.,.--.~-.---.---~.."- - -··----,,_·_·_______...._.__M_ A THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT EXHIBIT You are required to fùe a Statemen! of Disclosure of cenain ownership or financial interests. payments, or campaign contributioos, on aU matters which will require discr~tionary action on the pan of the Ciry Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: I, List the names of aU persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of th~ application or the Contract, e,g., owner, applicant, Contractor, subcontractor, material supplier, 2. If any person· identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or panncrship, list the names of aU individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any panncrship interest in the panncrship. 3. If any person· identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. 4, Have you had more than S250 worth of business ~ any member of the Ciry staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees, and Council within the past twelve month? Yes _ N~ If yes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independen! Contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this maner. 6. Have you and/or your offic~rs or age the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council member in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No If yes. state which Council members(s): · · . (NOTE: Attached additional pages as necessary) . . . D~ cp3hJ ~'~~ f 0 ntractor lic t e&/6-- tJ. VA.! 0)( . PRE S_ Prim or type name of Comractorl Applicam * ~ is dejirræ as: -Any individllal, firm. cQ-parrnLrship. joint venlUTe, tßsociation, sociß1 clllb. fraternal organizalion, corporation, eSlare. trUSt, receiver, syndicate, this anà any ocher county, dry or country. ciIy municipality, distria. or other poliIicaJ subdivision. or Q'1'!)' other group or combinarion aaing as a uniI. . 14 /0 -,5 '-"--~-- ._,--~--~ ID RESOLUTION No./9S'-f'<& RESOLUTION OF THE CIT~_COUNCIL OF .THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAKING A SPECIFIC FINDING THAT IRREGULARITIES IN THE BID OF KNOX ELECTRIC, INC. ARE WAIVED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC; ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO KNOX ELECTRIC, INC. FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION (EVPE) SYSTEM ALONG FOURTH AVENUE CORRIDOR IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA (TF261) ; AND TRANSFERRING REMAINING $40,000 IN TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE COMPLETED BROADWAY AND FLOWER STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL CIP FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT WHEREAS, on June 23, 1999, the Director of Public Works received the following five (5) bids for the installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVPE) System along Fourth Avenue corridor: Contractor Bid Amount l. Knox Electric, Inc. - Spring Valley $118,605 2. Peek Signal Maintenance, Inc. - Santee $138,950 3. Trasig Corp. - Bonita $139,400 4. T & M Electric, Inc. dba Perry Electric - $142,650 E1 Cajon 5. DBX, Inc. - Temecula $147,852 WHEREAS, the low bid of $118,605 for the project was received from Knox Electric, Incorporated and is $20,345 below the second lowest bidder and below the Engineer's estimate of $135,000 by approximately 13.82%; and WHEREAS, the low bid from Knox Electric, Inc. contains some minor irregularities in that the bid proposal omitted the unit prices written in words and omitted the lump sum prices written in numbers, however, these omissions on the bid proposal do not affect the bid price; and WHEREAS, the bid as submitted was clear and unambiguous and the omission of such items did not provide Knox Electric, Inc., wïth any unfair advantage and it appears that these omissions are a minor irregularity in filling out the bid proposal and do not appear to be the vehicle for any type of favoritism; and WHEREAS, the failure to provide the omitted information does not affect the ability to make bid comparisons; and 1 /!) -~ - WHEREAS, Charter Section 1009 provides that public wDrks projects shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder whose bid is determined to be, in all r.espects, mO$t advantageous to the public interest; and WHEREAS, Section 1009 of the Charter also provides that the City Council may waive any defects in the bid to the extent that it finds at a public hearing held for that purpose that it is necessary to do so for the benefit of the public; and WHEREAS, therefore, pursuant to the authority provided under the city Charter, Council may make a specific finding that such irregularities are waived for the benefit of the public, and may proceed to award the contract to the low bid contractor, Knox Electric, Inc. for this project. WHEREAS, the source of funding for this project is the Traffic Signal Fund and it will be necessary to transfer an additional $40,000 for the purchase of additional equipment (controller cabinets and EVPE test equipment) and to expend funds for staff time for design and field investigations prior to bidding the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby make a specific finding that irregularities in the bid of Knox Electric are waived for the benefit of the public. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby accept said five bids and award the contract to Knox Electric, Inc. for the installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVPE) System along Fourth Avenue corridor (TF261) . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the amount of $40,000 is hereby transferred in remaining Traffic Signal Fund appropriations from the completed Broadway and Flower Street Traffic Signal CIP (TF2 57) into Traffic Signal Fund 22500-7999/24592610 (TF261) for construction of the project. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ John P. Lippitt , Director of A ney Public Works H:\home\attorney\reso\knox.bid 2 10-1 -- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 11 Meeting Date 7/27/99 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing Regarding Intention to Order Certain Changes and Modifications to the Engineer's Report in Assessment Districts #94-l. Resolution 1954'1- Ordering Certain Changes and Modifications or the Reapportion- ment in the Assessments Levied within Assessments Districts #90-3 and #94-1 SUBMITTED BY: Di,_ of "'h1ie w""~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ ~ \ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No X) The City previously formed Assessment Districts Nos. 90-3 and 94-1 to finance infrastructure benefitting the developing properties within the EastLake Trails project. The method of apportioning the original assessments reflected the land use entitlements then applicable to the properties within each respective assessment district. As a result of the phasing ofthe subdivision of the properties within the Assessment Districts, the EastLake Company has asked the City to approve certain changes and modifications in and/or reallocations of the existing assessments within these two assessment districts. These changes will correspond to the development currently reflected in the final map for the Trails South project and those other land use approvals for the EastLake Trails North and the EastLake Vistas approved by the City since the formation of the assessment districts. Tonight's action will include a tally of all assessment ballots from property owners affected by the proposed changes for A.D. #94-1, which would result in an increase in the assessments levied against such parcels due to changes recommended to that district's boundaries. All the parcels affected and the ballots from property owners are for undeveloped land only. No existing residences will be affected by these assessment district changes and modifications. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council: l. Open the hearing, take testimony, and close the hearing regarding the proposed changes in the assessments levied in Assessment District #94-1; 2. Direct staff to tally all assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing pertaining to Assessment District #94-1; 3. Adopt the Resolution to approve certain changes and modifications or the reapportion- ment in the assessments levied within Assessment Districts #90-3 and #94-1. /I-I _·.._'m.'_.~··_·~_____·__,..·.._.____.___ Page 2, Item~ Meeting Date 7/27/99 DISCUSSION: Backl!round Due to phasing of the subdivision of the properties within the Assessment Districts, the EastLake Company has requested that changes and modifications be ordered for Assessment Districts No. 90-3 and 94-1 for the EastLake Trails project. The EastLake Trails is separated into two final map areas, the North and the South. The final map for the South was approved by Council on June 8, 1999. The final map for the Trails North is anticipated to be forwarded to Council for approval in early 2000. The changes and modifications to these assessment districts is necessary due to the existing assessment debt affecting the EastLake Trails North, EastLake Trails South, and EastLake Vistas development, which are being developed in separate phases. The EastLake Trails South is currently being developed and is located within the existing boundaries of Assessment Districts No. 90-3 (see Exhibit 3B) and 94-1 (see Exhibit 3D). Therefore, the EastLake Company has requested that the existing assessment reapportiomnent be conducted to separate the assessments for EastLake Trails North, EastLake Trails South, and EastLake Vistas. Due to the reapportiomnent, the assessment district payments per residential unit belonging to the EastLake Trails South development are determined, and assessment payments for residential units within the EastLake Trails North and EastLake Vistas development would be determined at the time final maps for these projects are brought forward. These reapportiomnents are intended to bring the assessments into conformity with the land use approvals and dedication requirements for the properties within these assessment districts. Although not required by applicable assessment district law, the approval of reapportiomnents for A.D. No. 90-3 are being brought to the City Council for approval because they are integralJy related to the proposed changes and modifications to Assessment District No. 94-1. The approval of the reapportiomnents for A.D. No. 90-3 are not subject to the procedural requirements of Article XIIID and will not be subject to the public hearing and assessment balJot procedures. When an assessment district encompassing undeveloped property is initialJy formed, an assessment is levied against the legal parcels existing at the time of the formation of the assessment district. In undeveloped areas, these parcels are typically large parcels which will be subject to future subdivision. When such a parcel is subdivided it is necessary for the City to reapportion the original principal amount of the assessment levied against this large parcel among the parcels created as a result of the subdivision. The applicable assessment district law provides that a reapportiomnent may normalJy be approved at a stafflevel. When the subdivision or development of such larger parcels necessitates an actual change in assessments rather than the reapportiomnent of the existing assessments, the City Council must initiate proceedings to consider such a change and modification. If the change and modification does not result in the increase of an assessment on any parcel, the City Council may consider and approve such changes and modifications without the necessity, in undeveloped areas, for a public hearing or without going through the assessment balJot procedure mandated by Article XIIID of the Constitution (Proposition 218), thus no balJot or public hearing is required for Assessment District #90-3. However, when approval of a change ¡I-d- ---.---" -_.".._."_..~---~-_....~--~,,._-~,_._. ~-_.__._.- Page 3, ItemL Meeting Date 7/27/99 and modification in assessment would result in an increase in any assessment, such increase in assessment is subject to the requirements of Article XIIID which includes the requirement that the owner(s) of the property subject to a proposed increase in assessment be given the opportunity to submit assessment ballots in favor of or in opposition to such increase in assessment, thus an assessment ballot procedure and a public hearing is required for Assessment District #94-1. In the current circumstances, the northerly boundary of the final map for the EastLake Trails South project encompasses a small portion of the property of the EastLake Trails North (see Exhibits 1A & 1B). The property in EastLake Trails North is included in Assessment District No. 90-3, but is not included in Assessment District No. 94-1, and hence is not subject to assessment for Assessment District No. 94-1. The property within EastLake Trails South is included in both Assessment District No. 90-3 and Assessment District No. 94-1. The EastLake Company desires to have uniform assessments within its specific developments. This practice of providing for uniform assessments within specific developments has also been adopted by the City. As a result, the EastLake Company has requested that the City Council consider a change and modification in Assessment District No. 94-1 which would add the area for this assessment district to coincide with that portion of the EastLake Trails property within the fmal map for the EastLake Trails South project. On June 8, 1999, the City Council approved Resolution #19483 (see Exhibit 2) declaring its intention to order certain changes and modifications in and/or reallocations of the existing assessments within Assessment Districts Nos. 90-3 and 94-1 for the EastLake Trails and EastLake Vistas. Assessment District #90-3 The EastLake Trails South, EastLake Trails North, and EastLake Vistas projects are all included in the area defined by the Assessment District #90-3 boundary. The existing debt for Assessment District #90-3 pertaining to the said projects is presented in Table 1. Special District Financing and Administration (SDF A) has determined the reallocation of the debt within the EastLake Trails South, EastLake Trails North, and EastLake Vistas. The proposed reallocation of debt was determined by using the methodology adopted by the Engineer's Report pertaining to the subject Assessment District. The proposed reallocation for A.D. #90-3 is presented in Tables 2 through 4. Due to the fmal map for the EastLake Trails South project being approved on June 8, 1999, SDFA has determined the amount of debt to be assessed per individual lot. In as much as the proposed reallocation of assessments within Assessment District #90-3 will not result in an increase in assessments for any parcel, this reallocation is not the subject of the public hearing and no assessment ballot procedures are required for the reallocation. 11-3 ., -- ---- - - -- ---,--"..-.-..- ---..----. ..-.--.-----------..---.. Page 4, ItemJL Meeting Date 7/27/99 TABLE 1: Existing Assessment District Debt Allocation for Assessment District #90-3. APN #'s Developments Original Principal Current Assessors Affected Amount Debt Parcel 90-3 Amount Numbers 90-3 643-030-16 Trails South I North $532,147.00 $454,329.75 643-030-17 Trails South $220,932.00 $188,624.53 595-080-14 Trails North $176,118.00 $150,363.80 595-080-21 Trails South I North $66,611.00 $56,870.30 595-080-26 Trails South I North $334,314.00 $285,426.39 Subtotal $1,330,122.00 $1,135,614.77 643-040-05 Trails South I Vistas $2,054,389.06 $1,753,970.37 595-090-09 Trails South I Vistas $46,536.00 $39,730.92 Subtotal $2,100,925.06 $1,793,701.29 TOTAL $3,431,047.06 $2,929,316.06 TABLE 2: Proposed Assessment District Debt Reallocation for A.D. #90-3, EastLake Trails South Developments APN #'s Original Principal Current Affected Assessors Amount Debt Parcel 90-3 Amount Numbers 90-3 Trails South $732,060.00 $625,008.95 Portion of 643-030-16 643-030-17 Portion of 595-080-21 Portion of 595-080-26 Portion of 643-040-05 Portion of 595-090-09 Total $732,060.00 $625,008.95 11- L{ - ----.- ....- - -_...."~_...__..._.__..._._. ..-......-----.-...---.. Page 5, ItemJJ Meeting Date 7/27/99 The recently approved EastLake Trails South Final Map includes 535 lots proposed for single family homes and Lot 536 which is proposed for a multi-family site (92 Dwelling Units). 1 EDU for each single family residence and 0.8 EDU for each multi-family dwelling unit, as required by the original method of apportionment, were used in the calculation of the reallocation. SDFA has determined that the reallocation of debt (A.D. #90-3) will be $1,202.86 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) for the lots within the recently approved EastLake Trails South Final Map, as shown by the following calculation: ($732,060.00) / {(535 Single Family Lots)' (I EDU) + (92 Multi-Family DU's) · (0.8 EDU's)} = $1,202.86 The reallocation of debt for the EastLake Trails North and EastLake Vistas projects (Tables 3 and 4) were determined using the methodology adopted by the Engineer's Report pertaining to A.D. #90-3. The values were based on a proportionate share of special benefit received in the project area. The lot designation and amounts have not been determined at this time. However, reallocation of assessment debt will need to be conducted at the completion of final map preparation for the said projects. TABLE 3: Proposed Assessment District Debt ReaUocation for A.D. #90-3, EastLake Trails North Developments APN #'s Original Principal Current Affected Assessors Amount Debt Parcel 90-3 Amount Numbers 90-3 Trails North $598,062.00 $510,605.82 Portion of 643-030-16 Portion of 595-080-21 Portion of 595-080-26 595-080-14 Total $598,062.00 $510,605.82 11-5 ...---.....-.-...-..--...--- Page 6, ItemlL Meeting Date 7/27/99 TABLE 4: Proposed Assessment District Debt Reallocation for A.D. #90-3, EastLake Vistas APN #'s Developments Original Principal Current Assessors Affected Amount Debt Parcel 90-3 Amount Numbers 90-3 The Vistas $2,100,925.06 $1,793,701.29 Portion of 643-040-05 Portion of 595-090-09 TOTAL $2,100,925.06 $1,793,701.29 Conclusion for A.D. #90-3 Based on the reallocation of the A.D. #90-3 debt presented here tonight showing that all lots will have uniform assessments reflecting the special benefit to such properties from the improvements financed, it is staff's recommendation that Council adopt the resolution to approve the changes and modifications to the Engineer's Report for A.D. #90-3. Assessment District #94-1 The lots within the EastLake Trails South Final Map area are located in a portion of the area confmed by Assessment District #94-1. In order to separate the assessments for the EastLake Trails South project area to reflect the parcels created by the initial subdivision of such property, the reapportionment was required for Assessment District #94-1. The existing debt allocation for Assessment District #94-1 is presented in Table 5. SDFA has determined the reapportionment of debt for A.D. #94-1 using the methodology adopted by the Engineer's Report pertaining to A.D. #94-1 based on the proportionate share of special benefit. The reapportionment was conducted only for the EastLake Trails South project (Table 6). EastLake Trails North and EastLake Vistas do not have any assessment debt pertaining to this district and were not included as part of the proposed reapportionment for A.D. #94-1. I /-~ ._....._._._-"_.~--"--_.__._--_...._..".,.-._"~-- .'.- Page 7, ItemL Meeting Date 7/27/99 TABLE 5: Existing Assessment District Debt Allocation for Assessment District #94-1. APN #'s Developments Original Current Assessors Affected Principal Amount Debt Parcel 94-1 Amount Numbers 94-1 643-030-16 Trails South I North $764,983.24 $720,935.95 643-030-17 Trails South $765,442.97 $721,369.21 595-080-14 Trails North 595-080-21 Trails South I North 595-080-26 Trails South I North Snbtotal $1,530,426.21 $1,442,305.16 643-040-05 Trails South I Vistas 595-090-09 Trails South I Vistas Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL $1,530,426.21 $1,442,305.16 TABLE 6: Proposed Assessment District Debt Reapportionment for AD #94-1, EastLake Trails Soutb Developments APN #'s Original Current Affected Assessors Principal Amount Debt Parcel 94-1 Amount Numbers 94-1 EastLake Trails $1,530,426.21 $1,442,305.16 South Portion of 643-030-16 643-030-17 Portion of 595-080-21 Portion of 595-080-26 Portion of 643-040-05 Portion of 595-090-09 Total $1,530,426.21 $1,442,305.16 11-1 -- -- ..--.-.-.--- -- ._._---_.--,-,._-----~_. - Page 8, ItemJL Meeting Date 7/27/99 The recently approved EastLake Trails South Final Map includes 535 lots proposed for single family homes and Lot 536 which is proposed for a multi-family site (92 DweUing Units). 1 EDU for each single family residence and 0.8 EDU for each multi-family dweUing unit, as required by the original method of apportionment, were used in the calculation of the reaUocation. SDP A has determined thatthe reaUocation of debt (A. D. #94-1) will be $2,514.667 per Equivalent DweUing Unit (EDU) for the lots within the recently approved EastLake Trails South Pinal Map, as shown by the foUowing calculation: ($1,530,426.21) I {(535 Single Family Lots) · (1 EDU) + (92 Multi-Family DU's)' (0.8 EDU's)} = $2,514.667 Conclusion for A.D. #94-1 Based on the reapportionment of the A. D. #94-1 debt presented here tonight showing that aU lots will have uniform assessments reflecting the special benefit to such properties from the improvements fmanced, it is staffs recommendation that Council adopt the resolution to approve the changes and modifications to the Engineer's Report for A.D. #94-1. It is also recommended that Council: 1. Open the hearing, take testimony, and close the hearing regarding Assessment District #94-1 ; 2. Direct staff to taUy aU assessment baUots pertaining to Assessment District #94-1; 3. Adopt the Resolution to approve the changes and modifications to the Engineer's Report within Assessment District #94-1. Conclusions The City Council has previously initiated proceedings and held public hearings pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Improvement Act"), for these assessment districts. Based on the reapportion of the assessments on large vacant lands, one district (A.D. No. 94-1) requires a public hearing and the other (A.D. No. 90-3) does not, but needs reapportionment. When there is a transfer of a portion of an assessment from one parcel to another increasing the assessment on such parcel, the requirements for "Proposition 218, the Right To Vote On Taxes Act" is triggered. In compliance with Proposition 218 and State Law, tonight's Public Hearing was scheduled at the June 8, 1999 Council Meeting. /!- g -_.._----_.__..._._-~-_._..._.,,-,-_._, ..~.__.__.--.- Page 9, ItemJL Meeting Date 7/27/99 Staff has been working with Financial Counsel, Ms. Barbara Hale-Carter of "Special District Financing & Administration", and Legal Counsel, Mr. Warren B. Diven, Esq. of "Brown Diven Hessell & Brewer LLP", as agents for the City. They will be present at tonight's meeting to answer any questions relating to this agenda item. The debt on an average single family house in the Trails South will be as follows: Assessment District Annual Assessment AD 90-3 $1202.86 AD 94-1 $2514.67 Total $3717.53 FISCAL IMPACT: EastLake Development Company will pay all costs associated with the "Changes & Modifications" to Assessment Districts No. 90-3 and 94-1. The City will receive the benefit of full cost recovery for staff costs to be paid by EastLake and not by the Assessment Districts. The impact of the change and modifications is to separate the assessment debt affecting the Assessors Parcel Numbers for the proposed development. Tonight's action on each of the Assessment Districts will not affect any assessment for properties located outside of the EastLake Trails and Vistas property (EastLake I, EastLake Greens, EastLake Business Center). The EastLake Company has deposited funds with the City to cover all costs associated with these proceedings. Exhibits: Exhibits lA & IB . EastLake Trails North I South & EastLake Vistas Site Plans Exhibit 2 - Resolution #19483 dated June 8, 1999 Exhibit 3A - Assessment District No. 90·3 (Description of Work) Exhibit 3B - Assessment District No. 90-3 (Assessment Diagram) Exhibit 3C - Assessment District No. 94-1 (Description of Work) Exhibit 3D - Assessment District No. 94-1 (Assessment Diagram) Exhibit 4 - Council Minutes dated June 8. 1999 FILE: 0340-05-ADOOl 0725-Q5-ADOO3 0725-10-AD 90-3 0725-10-AD 91-1 0725-IO-AD 94·} 0600-SO-ETOOIF 06ûO-SO-ETOO4R Jul20, 1999; 1O:49AM H:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA \ETOO4PH .FXR }/-1 ... ------_.._.._-_._-_.._-~.,---_._~....----------..- RESOLUTION NO. I q 5 tfcr RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS OR THE REAPPORTIONMENT IN THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS #90-3 AND #94-1 WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, has adopted a Resolution pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 4.5 of Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and specifically Section 10353 (the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913") (the "Improvement Act"), declaring its intention to order certain changes and modifications in the proceedings and the assessments, and did, pursuant to law, set forth a time and place for a public hearing on said proposed changes and modifications in special assessment districts known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-1 (the "Assessment District No. 94-1"); and, WHEREAS, at this time notice of the public hearing on the proposed changes and modifications in Assessment District No. 94-1 has been given in the manner and form as required by law; and, WHEREAS, such notice of public hearing as provided to the record owner of any parcel for which the assessment was proposed to be increased was accompanied by an assessment ballot as required by as required by Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (" Article XIIID") and the Propositio n 218 Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following)(the "Implementation Act") (the Improvement Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to herein collectively as the "Assessment Law")' and , , WHEREAS, at this time this City Council determines that the assessment ballots received by the City in favor of the proposed increase in the assessment and weighted as required by the Assessment Law exceeded the assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed increase in assessment and similarly weighted and, therefore, a majority protest pursuant to the Assessment Law does not exist; and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council also desires to approve the reapportionment of assessments within Assessment District No. 90-3; and WHEREAS, such reapportionment does not result in the increase of the assessment levied against any parcel in Assessment District No. 990-3 and, therefore, no public hearing is required as a precondition to the approval of such reapportionment; and WHEREAS, this legislative body has heard the presentation and testimony as it relates to the proposed changes and modifications, and this legislative body is now ready to proceed to take ac tion on said proposed changes and modifications in Assessment District No. 94-1 and the proposed reapportionment in Assessment District No. 90-3. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. 11- 10 - SECTION 2. This legislative body hereby orders those changes and modifications in the assessments levied within Assessment District No. 94-1 as set forth in the report of Special District Financing and Administration, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the Superintendent of Streets. This legislative body hereby further orders the reapportionment of assessments levied within Assessment District No. 90-3 as set forth in such report of Special District Financing and Administration. SECTION 3. The decisions and determinations of this legislative body ordering the above-referenced changes and modifications shall be final and conclusive upon all persons entitled to appeal thereon. SECTION 4. The Engineer's "Report", the Assessment Roll, and all related documentation, as herein modified, are for the best interest of the property owners within the Assessment District, and said modified "Report" shall stand as the Engineer's "Report" for all subsequent proceedings relating to this Assessment District. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt (À ,Î\ÂA~ ~ John Kaheny Public Works Director City Attorney H: Ihomelattorneylreso Ichanges. wd /1-/1 - EXHmIT 3A ? ,:.3\"; \" D=""CR!?T10'"' 0;: WDR"': ASSESS)'~;:"'"T DlSTRJCT NO. 90-3 .' The genera} description Df wDrk to be funded by Assc:ssrnent District ~ 3 consists of the following: 1. Street improvements consisting of grading. base, paving. curb, gutter. sidewalk, street lighting and landscaping within the folJowing rights-of-way: 2.. Nonh G=sview Drive - from Hunte Parl..-way west to Clubhouse Drive. b. Master Ridge Road - from Nonh Greenview Drive nDnh to its =inus. c. Clubhouse Drive - . from Hunte Parkway west to Eastl.ake Parkv,:ay. d. Gr=sgate Drive - from Nonh Greenview Drive west to "';,'tLake Parb..:ay. e. ;:;,'tLake Parkway - from C>-.ay Lakes Road south to SDG&E easemem. .. Hunte Parkway - fTOm Or.ay Lakes Road south to Clubhouse Drive. ., U:jlJties and underground improvements consisting of potabJe wale¡- facijjùe", .. ;-~l2.imt.d v.·2.t~; faciliri:::s, sanita.J~· s~w~r5, stann å2ins. lJTl£atJon Íacihties anè - - uúiiry undergrounåing as appropriaœ by applicable state and fed::raJ Statutes "''Íthin the fonowing rights-of-way: 2.. Eêst1ake Parb:ay - from Or.ay La1= Road south tD the SDG&E easement. b. Nonh G=sview Drive - from Hunte Parl..-way west to CJubhouse Drive. c. Master Ridge Road - from Nonh GrecnsVicw Drive nonh to its terminus. d. CJubhDuse Drive.- from Hunte Pari-way west to Eastl.ake Parkway. e. Gr=sgate Drive - frDm Nonh Gr=sview Drive west to E2stLake Parkv.'zy. f.. Hunte Pa:J..-way - from Orange Avenue nonh to Olay Lakes Read_ " Olay Lakes Roaå - from E2stLake Parkway east to its terminus DDSite. e' ., Two sewe¡- pump stations and associated force mains Jocated in Otay Lakes Road and .:>. ;::",<tLake Park.-wzy. q JSS'.JANE:TI04lXXJ.X"¡unr :W. lÝ9) .----.---.-.- ..-----.----..-.--.. . . This page blank · .--- -- - '-- ~ ..' -. - -',-.. ------ - -',. · · /U · EXHIBIT 3B l .ASSESSMENT DIAGRAfJ. OF - ., ¡ _-\SSESS~'1E\T DIST'RICT 90-:3 r CiTY 0, :>"EJ u.. \':S7 t.., C~:Jt\7Y Or SAN DI£:GC, STA7£: Or C~1-i;:-D?N¡A EASTLAKE GREENS PHAS¡.. I ~ ~ \ þ,;0":''TD~ r-- 0~9. ~ ~ U69, '. , ---' -'""" ", 03 , -'""" , \ , , ~ \ ¡ -~~~~ A.1\r .e.,_ e-'T WAS LC\ÐØ"''TIo£:1t'r::::t..l'O.. tF ToE:T."r::F \ o-u,..t. ~'" STAiE a::: ~ O..;~.a.;::œ..s tF ~-.o~ ~ 'TIoIS A_- aIr ~.....,p. s....t) ..ca::___ en ...AS LoEwe:. th io£ PAy tF IiiIiiIO SAD "'--1111 ~ -c"o£ ~en IO..L ~ ~ N ToE tR'CE tF 'nE sn:e;T ~~tF'Tt£::2TTŒ:>u....LVS"1'...tN'oE c.r.'r tF g;c ~lStroU.:EiDTioE" t?1'T1C...L~""T..e: ~ CF"..e S'T1ET ~ ~ 'roE D:A.:"f A~ 0: ~ ~LE\IEI~E..t.:>I~I:FJ..AI'oO~tJ,,;THS &_- Er.~ ;T.'T~;T.'rCF-Ot,..L,.I."'5i1.. R.E N 'nE ~ t:F 'Tf.E ~ Q.Sk tF 'n£ :r.'I' tF OU,.&. VS'!.. 'f1.E_Q.r..Y:F IõIiiC ;:;a~;::7'T"D1..L"'Io'S.'" \j I=E::::R:Ð .... To£ CF=C:E ::F ~ SiõEï ~~ tF ïo-E ~ ;;¡:: :>u...A1o'Si"'T~_:lA.T::F = =-'OC:::I~'~~ L::G::N:) ::::TTtFtK.L<I.~... - - - D1STIU:T BOUNDARY ~~--:=-p~tF i:J'waPS~·&.T £ -r~~,~~::. rx:x::."..e.."i;G --¡::;-or~o=;=a [F '1'£ :::u-..~ ~ tF jot ~T CF SA.o,¡ ~ S"íA"i'E::F t..t.:..FCR.&.t.. PLR:E:L eOr..nc:...'f ~ I:F SANI::EiCr::u.~ 1- ,..c.~ NOT A P.c.J:¡T Or' ¡HE O!SjR¡:l I """" 0 .c.SSE:Ssw£NT NUMSER TI-E ~ ~ FAR:a.S AS.9OJIt.,¡ ~"'IE AS ~ tN TI-E ASSEss:::JO;'S ~.IoR:E. ~ tF -:0£ ~/ ::::u.,"7"-:F SN.I:ecc S'ÏJ.iE 0: ~ 'A7 'W..J!...LD...... "$50:"1"',;.5 ~ om J 0' '7 SHUTS 1'/ -...-. ~ -- - ---- .-- ¿],. ---.._- -...------.-.". · This page blank · · · ':2..- /v EXHIBIT 3C ASSESSME"-J DJSTRJCT ~: PART \1 DE"CRJPllO:'\ OF wORKS OF IMPROYEME",¡ Th~ propDS~ works of improvcm= an: g=ralJy d~=ri¡"..d as follows: .' 1- Strcc! improvements consisting of gndjng. base, paving. curb. guncr. sidewalk, srr= lightIDf and landscaping wiùùn the following rights-of-",,'a)": Ã. South Gr=sview Drive - from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 C!t!I'aJIœ (2,400 L.F., Phase 1). b. South Greensvi~w Drive - from Silveratlo Drive to Hunte Parkway (3.400 L.F.. Phas~ 2). , South Gr~=vj~w Drive - from Unit 6 =~ to SiJvcrado Driv~ 0.920 LF.. Phase 3) ~ Utiliti~s 4Ild underground unprovem~nts consISting of potab]~ v.-arer fÃcilitj~s. storm drain _. fa:ili1i::s. S~U':: fa:iliti::s. r=:laim::d war:r fa:i1ItÎ:s. ::):::L-i: fa:iliti=s. t:l:phon: fa::îliti:s. an: fas fa::¡¡jll~$ as appropriat~ by appiicabk stat~ and federal stanl!~S v.-irhjn th~ following rights-of· U'2'": a. South G~=vi~' Driv~ - from CJubhous~ Driv~ to Unit 6 = (2.400 LF.. Phas~ I). b. South Gr=s\'iew Drive - from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3.400 L.F.. Phas~ 2). ~. South Grecnsview Drive - from Unit 6 c:nmmc:e to Silverado Drive (1.920 L.F_. Phase --- - ---- - 3). -.-" - 3. DIF fund~ Str= improvcm~ms consisting of grading, Stonn drain. base. paving. c:urb. guner. sid~walk. medians. srr~t lighting. lands::aping and srr=t monumentarion ".-iùùn the following rights-of-way: 2.. HUnt~ Pari:way - from Clubhouse Drive to South G=.sview Drive (2.300 LF.. Phas~ 2). b. Hum~ Park""'ay - from South Gr=nsview to Onmg~ Avmu~ 0_270 LF.. Phzse 2). , DIF fund~ m=t and und~rground improvem~!S consisting of grading. arid stOrm drain ... improvem~nts v.-iùùn the follDwing rights-of-way: a. Oran~~ Av~nue - from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E easement (3.500 LF.. Phase 2). b. Orange Avenue - from Hunte Park.-way to the Olympic Training Center (to be funded onJy ill the event that the actual construction cost of all the TDIF improvements is lower than estimated) \\'PC M.:\.\.mME\ENGf"""EER.. t7~.~ /3 Pa£: ::5- I '·~M..._.._..._ .---.----- _""M.___"__,___ . . · This page blank · ------- - - ~ n_ ___ . -"'---. -- m · · /:{L - -- - "- EXHIBIT 3D - -- ..J"" - I 'SS;-C::S¡'¡;-N' D'''G-'f.I . . 1'-" ~,...... . ,....... -- '-' (ACQUISlïION) ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-1 CfTY Of CHULA VISTA, SïATE: Of CALIfORNIA . . COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO EAST LAKE GREENS II ¢ - .... ..... I I c;;;.. \ '-" \... ,I." .. I (j) tv DI » - - _.._~ -,- - - - - - ~ -- LEGENO AN a\IStD.M[1tt -..s UWIEÞ .... 'TN[ CftT CDUCII.. or 'TN[ CI1T or - . - en-..-...,. .J ÞaU. "1St... St&1t fIT c.a.ur....... 0It PAICUS at UICI .... DIe - - - DI:I'I.cr.......,. ,_ .."<1;1 OIT __ WI. MID ASK:I:SMtWT -.s LlWÞ .. be: ........- _0&" Dr .,~ MID.tSSZDCWT ~ MID "1It[ ~ IIDU. ... -=-oat . 'he DfTIC[ or 11C S'nIErf ~ .... ICIT A NIrT .. M asr.:r Dr TIC CI'7T OJ CNW.t. wsu. 011I 1M[-A&T or .1"!.. CD m'E1IClIIC[ 11 MDC 10 1M: ...~~ ~ IIIIE'CDCItÐ . TIt[ DfT'IC[ or - P'( .-:J: TNt ST1tr[T s...-...-'-"-'.I Fe. TNt t:u:T MIOI,ØT or tAÞI ASSDSatII[1tT UI.. . .,.. &..rw;:þ ~ t.a=M PAC:C. or I.MC) ...... 011 'nG ASKDIIIDI"I CMØIWL IIOTé ::nT c::..t-.. ern or c..u-.... wsr.. 1W[ ~ MID HoIICQ.S u ..,.. ~ MIl: .as SMCWIf OIl 1M[ ASSaI.DI"S ~ .....-s , or THE: CZIiI.MTT or ..... -=. SU.T[ Ø' ~ F'U%I .. 'n« CIf"F'1:I: or TMr em cu. D( 'TN[ :rTT fIT CNUU. Wi... I "'" "'T a.- . 11_ gn' MLG.. ern or 0tUv. 'ftE"IA. I IiCCIXCIQI . 'nC arn::t or 1M( STIat ax-.~.., Df TN[ CI1T or CMuu. YŒTA 1MIS a.- ,... starn SUII'[~r. an or ICHII.... 'lIS1A I I rt..l'D1'MIS_Q&"CW" ,.., AT _ II""C.D:X. _ · IICIOC _ "ACe _ or ...., ar AS::IiD:SMtWT IIIS'TET1. .r ",,;a DOCUIIItWT IiID. -TKDt'TlCtDrTKr c:::utTT II£CZNtD(I Of 1M[ CiCIUICTT Of SM DEDQ. STATI CF c...ur1*üA. ¡ c:::DIMIfTT~or....-=~ /:7 ( ! - ~--- --.---..-....-.-.- --_..,--,-,------ -------- .. This page blank -_._-.-- ---. ---- - - . /Ø -- ---- EXHIBIT 4 CO~SEJo.,ï CALENDAR (Continued) ]0. RESOLUTION] 9482, REJECTING AS NON-RESPONSIVE TIIE APPARENT LO\\'EST BIDDER AND AWARDING PURCHASING AGREEMENT TO TIIE LOWEST BIDDER HAWTHORNE MACHINERY COMPANY FOR TIIE PURCHASE OF A \v,HEELED EXCAVATOR On May 9, ]999, an advertisement was placed in The Star News soliciting bids for the proposed City purchase ofa wheeled excavator. In addition, eight prospective bidders from the Purchasing Agent's bid list, including one 10caJ vendor, were contacted directly. On May 20, 1999, the bidsforthe wheeled excavator were opened. Three bidders responded, but none were local. The lowest acceptable and responsive bidder was Hawthorne Machinery Company with a net total price of $] 87,478.54. Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works and Director of Finance) 11. RESOLUTION] 9483, DECLARING ITS JNTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN ASSESSMENTS LEVIED WITHIN ASSESSMENTDISTRICT NUMBER 94-], SETTING A PUBUC HEARING TIIEREON,AND ORDERING TIIE INITIATION OF ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES AS TO THOSE ASSESSMENTS PROPOSED TO BE INCREASED The City previously formed Assessment Districts NWribers 90-3 and 94-1 to finance infrastructure benefitting the developing properties within the EastLake Trails project. The method of apportioning the original assessments refIectedthe land use entitlements then applicable to the properties within each respective assessment district. The EastLake Company has asked the City to approve certain changes and modifications and/orrea1locations of the existing assessments within these two assessment districts to correspond to the development reflected in the final map for the Trails South project and those other land use approvals for the EastLake Trails North and theEastLake Vistas approved by the City since the formation of the assessment districts. Staff recommendati on: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works) ]2. RESOLUTION] 9484, APPROVING AWARD OF CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTRACT TO DUDEK AND ASSOCIATES, INe. TO PROVIDE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR THE SALT CREEK GRAVITY SEWER TRUNK The proposed Salt Creek Trunk will transport wastewater úom new developments in eastern ChuJa Vista and provide additional capacity to the existing wastewater collection systems in southern Chula Vista. The City needs the assistance of a consultant to provide engineering and environmental services and to prepare a preliminary design for the Salt Creek Gravity Trunk Sewer. On October 6,1998, Council approved the appropriation of$]50,000 úom the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund and $]50,000 from the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fund to cover the cost of the preliminary design for the Salt Creek Trunk Sewer. Approval of this resolution will allow for the preparation of the preliminary design and determine the environmental constraints and alignment for subsequent final design of the interceptor. Upon completing the preliminary design, the City will prepare a Request for Proposals and hire a consultant to prepare the final design. Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works) Page 4 - City Council /7 June 8, 1999 - -.--..... - . . This page blank --- - ----- - . /:;? . ! -...::. EXHIBIT 2 RESDLUTIDN NO. 19453 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA ' VISTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS Jill :NTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN ASSESSMENTS LEVIED WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-1, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON ANO OROERING THE INmATJON OF ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES AS TO THOSE ASSESSMENTS PROPDSED TO .BE INCREASED WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of ~e CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, has previously undertaken proceedings to form and did form, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipallmprovement.Act of 1913". being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Improvement Act"), Assessment District designated .as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-1 ·(the "Assessment District"); and WHEREAS, at this time it appears to this legislative bOdy that certain t:hanges and modifications.in !:ertain assessments clre necessary, and that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10353 of said Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 21B Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the ~Implementation Act") (the Improvement Act, Article XIIID ahd the Implementation Act are Teferred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), it is necessary that this legislative body adopt a Resolution briefly describingtheJ roposed changes in certain assessments and giving notice of a time and place fora public .flearing where persons may appear and show cause why said changes should not be ordered. - NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOllOWS: SECTION'. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The public interest, convenience and necessity Tequires, and it is the intention ofthis legislative body, to order certain changes and .modifications in the proceedings and the assessments as set forth in the report of Special District Financing & Administration, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3_ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING IS HEREBY SCHEDULED IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 276 FOURTH AVENUE, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ON JULY 27,1999, AT 6:00 P.M. AT WHICH TIME THE CITY COUNCIL WILL HEAR ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS. ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE CrTY COUNCIL AND SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS SHOULD NOT BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OFTHIS RESOLUTION. RIGHT TO SUBMIT ASSESSMENT BALLOT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OFTHE ASSESSMENT LAW, EACH RECORD OWNER OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH THE ASSESSMENT IS PROPOSED TO BE INCREASED HAS THE RIGHï TO SU8MIT AN ASSESSMENT BALLOT IN FAVOR OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN ASSESSMENT. ,.-..- ---. J __.. .__.__u____...___......_~..._ Resohltion ~ 94£3 Page 2 ASSESSMENT BALLOTS WILL 3E MAIL::!) TO THE R::CORD OWN::R OF EACH PARCEL LOCATED WITHIN THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR WHICH THE , ASSESSMENT IS PROPOSED TO BE INCREASED. EACH SUCH OWNER MAY COMP1.ETE SUCH ASSESSMENT BALLOT AND THEREBY INDICATE THEIR SUPPORT FOR OR OPPOSfTlON TO THE pROPOSED INCREASE IN . . ASSESSMENT. All.. SUCH ASSESSMENT BALLOTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY ClERK AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS AT OR BEFORE THE TIME SET FOR THE CLOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING: CITY CLERK CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276.FOURTH AVENUE. CHULA VIST A,CALlFORNIA 91910 A POSTMARK PRIOR TO SUCH DATE AND TIME WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE .PUBLlC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL CAUSE THE ASSESSMENT BALLOTS TIMELY RECEIVED TO BE TABULATED. IF A MAJORITY PROTEST EXISTS. THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL NOT IMPOSE AN INCREASE IN THE ASSESSMENT ON ANY PARCEL WITHIN THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. A MAJORITIf PROTEST EXISTS IF, UPON THE CONCLUSION OFTHEPUBLlC HEARING. ASSESSMENT BALLOTS SUBMJTTED IN OPPOSITION TO THE INCREASE IN ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT EXCEED THE ASSESSMENT BAL1:0TS SUBMITTED IN FAVOR OF SUCH INCREASE IN ASSESSMENTS_ IN TABULATING THE ASSESSMENT BALLOTS, THE ASSESSMENT BALLOTS SHALL BE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THE PROPORTIONAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OF THE AFFECTED PROPERTY. SECTION 4: The City Clerk is hereby directed 1:D cerrifyto the adoption of this Resolution and cause a copy to be l'Ublished in a newspaper designated ior the publication of legal notices once, not less than ten days prior to the public hearing, SECTION 5_ The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail notice of the Public Hearing and the adoption of this Resolution, together with the assessment ballot materials, tD the record owners of all real property proposed tD be assessed_ . SECTION 6. For any and all information relating 1:0 these proceedings. including information relating to assessment ballot procedure. your attention is directed to the person designated below: FRANK RIVERA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 FOURTH AVENUE CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 (619) 691-5266 . ? Res::>l:Jtion 19482 Page 3 Prepared by Approved as :0 iorm by , ~~, , P. Uppitt ßhn M. Kaheny {/ lie Works Director City Attorney . .- - r// '/ ..- .--"---..-- . ResolU!ion i 9483 Res~lU!ìo:l 1 S4£3 Page 4 Page &. PASSED. APPROVED. and ADOPTED by the City Coun::il of t11e Cr.:y of C11ula VIsta, California. this 8'" day of June. 1999, by the following Vote: I AYES: Counèilmembers:- Davis. MOD!. Salas and HOr.ton . NAYS: Councilmembers: None - . " . ABSENT: Councilmembers: Padilla ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None - ~~J/~--Á'rn~ Shirley Horton ayor ATTEST: ~I J .l. ó. 1 ;::::::2...: 8=J I (") ..J Susan Bigelow, City Clerk STATE OF CAUFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of ChuJa Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ResolU!ion No. 19483 was duly passed. approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of1:he Chula Vista City Council held on the 8'" day of June, 1999. ExecU!ed this 8'" day of June. 1999. 'l '(~ ~v...O,n~ Susan Bigelow. City Clerk u .? / r- :::tf/ < ~ >' "r .~ - ," """- .:::' If, -'''' , - -.'.,..: ~ ~ ",~' - - :. "1/ ...=:;: - - -. . - - - " - :::~ - :/ ;.< <"" < ~ ..,. - to¿ , :/. I I > I , I ..' ~ , \ ~ If I < ~ \ :r.: /" I :-':r. < â <;:< ~ , ~::n I ~ I I ::::~ :n - \ - «:> <> \ <'-- ID . - - g \ - -- I C'"'>-.J «:> :.... ,-.... 0 I \ :::¡ ~ k I I ~~I<.J «:> _tr. g «:> \ =:::: ¡'; g a--~ ð \ x: luD I ..~ ,..,. Ii: I I a~o.. - - Ie l:..J ..- II) ~. - ~~r::: oe: - .., Z let e I . :/. -'0:::; -z - ~ fi<i:!:r;;v' rl'" ~ < III -r:¡;3t. . ' - [1115'-5')"""'" . (III£' . .- - "- ~C'>~ , - --- ;.¿ ú'l.¡J < I S2 ~ ~~~ UJ ,..-' - tt: I ~~~ ~ - ¡ ;= < ~ I~~~ § ~ ~ (tJa ~t;¡Q;¡ <; ~ ~ I LU == - 3::~ ~ I I i I I ~to-. I to-. ~--J~ - ~f'.. ~-- Ie::: ~ ~- ;:::: I .....:~ ~ ..... ~~ ! . , " þ.\ ,..:., 'L.., ':- ,~, ..... ~ [¡j . , ~:;J) ¡ :;: to-. UJ .... - ~F.'C'\. ~ '" :::;: '" 0 '" --; >- >' < co ¿ O· / ~ " ;;:: í ; ¡¡; ~ 8 ill ~ D:: - -.------- _._--~-- . . . This page blank ;¿ ~- -.---....-----.---...-...--.- , ExHIBIT IB ", . -- ------.:...._-- ".... ~ .". ~ ,,(.. ~.' , --- .. "'.', ---- · '- -.... " ---== · ,. , . .... · ~ ), ~-- '~-K"· · -7 t_"\,. , · >-I : .- t-~ . I _---.¡ .-¡ .~~. '-1-";-..,.' -....... :' ! ..,,~: FIE ~V1S1".t..: ~ORHoor N3E:õ II \ - I : , -- -"7'. - ;. .~ ''':' --. , " .'-.-:.... .., <;~<:::-'~::... "- "/ ". < . \; ,~-. v', ; ,. .,:~. \_;......( \ \.--::.~~ ........)...". /.'\] - ...... "':" '.: JO · ~/ \;...."...... \ ' '-.\ "\/) , ~ , ",.:\., ~ : '"....j.. v.. ti!: · "', '0 0:,., ¡ i_'\) ~ '. .\ ~<~ ~= ~~ " ... r-~... ~ ':... ,y~ 1/, ~ ' ; ~¿À '", ,.cu,...., .' ~ , v/;. O"~ ',A, , "^ '0"'- '" ""'" · ..-;) \ , ' -"'.:; . , ¡ \~ .... :-- / { /-, '" I<!: ; :..-.. H ,,·¡').....>:.z,.- /, ~ : ;-',. \-í .! " )\.~ ^' .:< : ;-, q::(;V ; \ ~ .. c::; "'>-,-;' ;-1 - { <1' :......J' ---j ,.--,,-. í'y'-....ý V ! ! ' ., I:::J...--;. -.....} '--'-v !! ! ---;, '.... '! '. ...... ' '-1 -----\. '-'v'/.'... ' PA%>./" J _',_, --< ~ "':. .~; . OKS/ ......0 '~..~. ~'. "-oy ~~' ~ . - s .. ~ ~.... ";. ~. /"\...-^ . ""'^C" ""'-é < / ",.~^ ~ '0, . '\ y"'" ", ~"" I~~\ .\sooo/ ~~ ~~. ~\' 'C... ... ~,.'-¥/": ~~ ~ AI LS ; :':~":: '~'--> ~x' . ~ K E T ~ . . . . ' "'!"~ >0, J""/ ,"X$ ·W/ ,/ A S T L A _. ... ,S · ~ "'" // E R _ A , -=-- "-- ,- NG A - . -i- 52...!&:.. 1 P LA N N 1 _7 , UT" _,_ ,",au AILS SO _ "" , TR :3 ~~ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ItemQ Meeting Date 7/27/99 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on the formation of the Town Centre and Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts 1. Resolution I q 5 i£Ðeclaring the results of the assessment ballot tabulation and confirming the diagram and assessment and providing for the levy of the annual assessment in Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting District Or in the Alternative: lA. Resolution 1955/ Declaring the results of the assessment ballot tabulation and abandoning the proceedings to levy an annual assessment in Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting District 2. Resolution/95""S-¿t)eclaring the results of the assessment ballot tabulation and confirming the diagram and assessment and providing for the levy of the annual assessment in Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting District Or in the Alternative: 2A. Resolution I q 568 Declaring the results of the assessment ballot tabulation and abandoning the proceedings to levy an annual assessment in Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting District SUBMITTED BY: Du,"'", o'''''bI;, W"'''' ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ ~ (4/Sths Vote: YecNo.x) The Town Centre and Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts were originally formed over 15 years ago and the City Council has annually undertaken proceedings to levy assessments to finance the maintenance of improvements within each District. In accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California, enacted by the approval of Proposition 218, the City Council adopted Resolution 19489 on June 8, 1999. This resolution declared the intent to levy annual assessments within the Town Centre and Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts, set the public hearing and initiated ballot proceedings in conjunction with the annual levy of assessments for these districts to bring the assessments into compliance with the provisions of Article XIIID. RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1. Open the public hearing, take testimony, close the public hearing; /p- -I -....- .--,....-.--- ~ __._._·__e_·___._····_·____·_"'________· -- -~..,-_.-. ....-.---~-~ Page 2, Item /2..- Meeting Date 7/27/99 2. Direct staff to tally all ballots; 3. Adopt the resolution either approving the formation of the Town Centre and/ or Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts or acknowledging the dissolution of the Town Centre and/ or Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts, based on the results of the ballot tabulation. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Back¡¡round On November 13, 1979 the City Council accepted the landscape improvements installed along Third Avenue between "E" and "F" Streets. The initial maintenance cost was covered by a loan from the Redevelopment Agency, pending establishment of an Assessment District in accordance with the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972. A public hearing was held and the District formation was authorized by Council on June 17, 1980. Costs were generally apportioned based on the footage of property facing Third Ave. and the assessed valuation of each property. Parcels between "F" and "G" Streets, which were slated to be redeveloped, were also included in the District since it was anticipated that the improvements would be extended to these blocks. These properties were initially assessed a nominal amount - generally between $10 and $40 per year. These amounts were later increased after these properties were developed. The facilities maintained by the Town Centre District include raised planters, container planters, shade structures with vines, supplemental tree plantings, landscaped covered bus stops, park benches, decorative street lamps, ornamental accent lighting in shade structures, decorative litter containers, ashtrays, enhanced stamped concrete sidewalks and walkways and an outdoor decorative clock. These improvements extend along Third Avenue from "E" Street to "G" Street. Memorial Park, which is located at Third Avenue and Park Way, is not included in the District and is not being maintained by the District. The Bay Blvd. Assessment District was established in 1982 to maintain street lighting and landscaping improvements installed that year on Bay Blvd. The District includes four large parcels along the east side of Bay Blvd. between "E" and "F" Streets. The District maintains the parkway plantings on the west side of Bay Boulevard from just south of the Nature Interpretive Center entrance at "E" Street to Lagoon Drive/ "F" Street. This parkway is composed of Acacia shrubs and palm trees to visually buffer the businesses on Bay Blvd. from an open drainage course, freight train tracks, electric transmission towers and a sewage pump station. Additionally, the park located at the northwest corner of Bay Blvd. and Lagoon Drive/ "F" Street is also maintained by the District. This park includes two separated lawn areas with picnic tables and tree, shrub and ground plantings. / ~-d- -..-...- ---- -- . - "-'-- .-.--.....-.-.-. ....._-~_._-_...~_.~.~ Page 3, Item 12- Meeting Date 7/27/99 Proposition 218, which took effect on July 1, 1997, requires that all existing, new or increased assessments comply with the act unless they fall under several exempted categories. Districts established for landscaping and lighting maintenance are not considered automatically exempt. All other Open Space Districts established by the City of Chula Vista prior to the passage of Proposition 218 were established pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all the parcels subject to the assessment, which entitles these districts to an exemption. Since the Town Centre and Bay Blvd. Assessment Districts were not established through such a petition or through voter approval, they are subject to Proposition 218 requirements, including preparation of a new Engineer's Report and conducting an assessment ballot procedure which allows all owners of assessed parcels to submit assessment ballots in favor of or in opposition to the levy of assessments. On June 8, 1999 the City Council adopted Resolution 19489, declaring the intent to levy annual assessments within the Town Centre and Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts, approving the Preliminary Engineer's Reports, setting the time and place for a public hearing to July 27, 1999 at 6:00 p.m., and ordering the initiating of assessment ballot procedures (Exhibit B). Assessment ballot materials, including a separate assessment ballot for each parcel within the proposed District boundaries, were sent out to all property owners of record on June 12, 1999. The mailing date was 45 days prior to the public hearing as required by statute. Proposed District Assessments Since the levy of the assessments within these Districts must comply with the provisions of Article XIIID, the method of allocating each property's fair share was reevaluated to insure that it also complies with the substantive requirements of Article XIIID. Based on the advice of the City's consulting attorney, Warren Diven, it was decided that use of parcel area would be a reasonable and justifiable method to spread the cost over the parcels. The level of service for the Bay Blvd. District is not proposed for change, since the City has not received any comments from property owners in this District. The annual budget for this District is anticipated to be $15,491 for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. However, due to the large reserve in the Bay Blvd. Fund, the net collectible amount would only be $5,210. The estimated cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) would decrease from $774 to $521. (Note that the number of EDUs is based on calculations for both Districts as previously formed and is included mainly as a method of comparison.) The assessment ballots sent to the four property owners within the Ba y Boulevard District were based on the calculations for the annual budget amount. The assessment ballots sent to the property owners in the Town Centre District offered two options. The" As Is" Option included the same level of service currently being provided. This option will result in a slight increase in the budgeted amount for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 from $45,422 to $48,812. The "Enhanced" Option is based on the list of items that some of the property owners and the Downtown Business Association wished to see implemented within the District (Enclosure C), and it would increase the budgeted amount to $124,283. Property owners received a two-part assessment ballot for each parcel, which involved voting yes or no on each /:;--3 - - --"- ----~.._._--, ,-.-.----'------------ Page 4, Item /1- Meeting Date 7/27/99 of the two options based on the annual budget amount. Due to the current fund balance, which is estimated at $85,612, the actual amount proposed to be billed is $12,012 for the "As Is" Option and $119,455 for the "Enhanced" Option. The Engineer's Reports (Enclosures D and E) include plats showing the boundaries for each district, the budget for each district and separate spreadsheets for the proposed assessment amounts (the budget for Fiscal Year 1999-2(00) and payment amounts (the billable amounts which take into account the fund balance). The Town Centre District includes budgets and spreadsh eets for both the "As Is" option and the enhanced service option. The annual assessment amount will be adjustable by the lesser of the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) or the change in the estimated fourth quarter per capita personal income as contained in the Governor's budget published in January. This is consistent with our administration of the City's other Open Space/ Landscaping and Lighting Districts and with Municipal Code Section 17.07.035. Results of Balloting Process According to Proposition 218, the City is required to mail assessment ballots stating the proposed assessment amounts to all record property owners at least 45 days in advance of a public hearing, at which the City shall consider all protests against the assessment and tabulate the assessment ballots. The assessment ballots shall be tabulated in proportion to the financial obligations of the individual property owners. The assessment may be imposed only if the majority of the assessment ballots as weighted and submitted are in favor of the assessment. For the Town Centre District, one of the two alternative assessments to finance the existing level of maintenance or the enhanced level of maintenance would need to be supported by the majority of the weighted vote in order for the City to continue to impose an assessment. If bo th alternatives receive a majority vote, the alternative with the largest proportion of "yes" votes would be selected. Property owners are entitled to submit their assessment ballots up to the time the public hearing is closed on July 27, 1999. Since all the assessment ballots have not been received prior to the public hearing, and no one alternative has received over 50 percent of the weighted vote, the results of the assessment ballot procedure cannot be determined with certainty at this time. Therefore, all remaining assessment ballots will be tabulated at the close of the public hearing and added to the results already tabulated. If the majority of property owners by weighted vote select "no" on their assessment ballots, the City has the option to either discontinue maintenance of the improvements or to fmd other sources of funding for this work. One possibility is to continue to maintain the Districts with the funds in the reserve during Fiscal Year 1999-2000 while assisting the property owners and/ or business owners in setting up a method for arranging for this work to be performed and bilJed in the future. Since there is an estimated fund balance of $85,612 for the Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting District and a balance of $25,772 for the Bay Boulevard District, there are sufficient funds available to do this. Since there seems to be greater support for the Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting District between "E" and "F" Streets than between "F" and "G" /?-tj __~~_____.__._ . ..'. n "__'_' ....__,.._..__.._.___ ___.._~.,_______.__. Page 5, Item /2 Meeting Date 7/27/99 Streets, that District might be reformed to just include the area north of "F" Street. Another alternative would be establishment of a Business Improvement District (BID). The type of BID which is financed by business owners has been determined to be exempt from Proposition 218 and would be managed by a board of business owners. A BID can be used to fInance various services to enhance a business district, such as maintenance, security, marketing and providing capital improvements. Other options for performing the maintenance work could be explored, such as having the Downtown Business Association contract for the maintenance work in the Town Centre area. It may be legally permissible for the City to enter into a contract with the Business Association for the performance of the maintenance work while the City bills the property owners, provided that the establishment of the District is approved by the ballot procedure. However, all of these options have ramifIcations and, depending on the results of the election, staff will return with a full report. During its meeting on June 1, 1999 the Downtown Business Association passed the motion, by a vote of six to zero, to have the City employ contract services instead of using current City staff to maintain the Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting District (see Exhibit A). FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fIscal impacts associated with a "yes" vote for the Bay Blvd. District or a "yes" vote on the "as is" option for the Town Centre District, since these choices will basically maintain to status quo. A "yes" vote for the Town Centre enhanced service option will increase the expenditures but have no net effect on the City, since these costs would be paid by the property owners. A "no" vote could have a fIscal impact if Council decides to pay for some or all of the maintenance costs. The annual impact of both districts is estimated at $64,311 , based on the "as is" option for Town Centre. Attachments: A. Letter from the Downtown Business Association dated June 1, 1999 B. Resolution 19489 and Council Agenda Statement C. Memorandum from the Downtown Business Association D. Engineer's Report for Bay Blvd. Open Space District E. Engineer's Report for Town Centre Open Space District July 21, 1999 (3:48pm) FILE: 0725-30-CFDOO H:\HOME\ENGlNEER\AGENDA\TOWNCTR3.EMC /:J- - 5 - _un _ ~_____._____~~_____ RESOLUTION NO. I? 5..pi(!) I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, has initiated proceedings for the levy of the annual assessment in a special maintenance district created pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Landscaping Act") , Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 et seq. ) (the "Implementation Act") (the Landscaping Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Lawfl) , in a special maintenance district known and designated as Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting District (hereinafter referred to as the "Districtlf) , and, WHEREAS, at this time all notice and public hearing requirements have been met relating to the levy of the annual assessments, WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report from the Assessment Engineer (the "Assessment Engineer's Report") and this city Council is now satisfied with the assessment and diagram and all other matters as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report as now submitted for final consideration and approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: RECITALS SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. PROCEDURES SECTION 2. This City Council hereby finds and determines that the procedures for the consideration of the levy of the assessments have been undertaken in accordance with the Assessment Law. 1 /:J--!t - ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES SECTION 3. Assessment ballots were mailed as required by Assessment Law to the record owners of all properties within the District which are proposed to be assessed. The assessment ballots that were completed and received by the City Clerk prior to the close of the public hearing have been tabulated in accordance with the procedures established by Assessment Law and the results of such tabulation have been submitted to this City Council. This City Council hereby finds that the assessment ballots submitted in favor of the levy of assessments as shown in the Assessment Engineer's Report as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law exceed the assessment ballots submitted in opposition to such levy also as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law. Therefore, no maj ority protest to the levy of assessments within the District has been found to exist. Additionally, this City Council finds that the assessment ballots submitted in favor of the levy of assessments to finance the maintenance of the [existing or enhanced] level of maintenance as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law exceed the assessment ballots submitted in favor of the assessments to finance the alternative level of maintenance also as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law. DETERMINATION AND CONFIRMATION SECTION 4. The final assessment to finance the [existing or enhanced] level of maintenance and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report, is hereby approved and confirmed. Based upon the Assessment Engineer's Report and the testimony and other evidence presented at the public hearing, the City Council hereby makes the following determinations regarding the assessments to be imposed for Fiscal Year 1999-2000: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each individual parcel assessed has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the operations and maintenance expenses. b. The assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel. c. Only the special benefits have been assessed. There are no parcels within the District that are owned or used by a local government, the State of California or the United States. The assessments to finance the [existing or enhanced] level of maintenance contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report for the 2 /:)-} ----- -<--...--.-----.-.--.-".-'- next fiscal year are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in such Assessment Engineer's Report. Assessments may be levied in next Fiscal Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter without further compliance with the assessment ballot procedures required under the Assessment Law at rates not to exceed the amounts levied in the preceding Fiscal Year subject to adjustment annually by the lesser of the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) or the change in the estimated fourth quarter per capita personal income as contained in the Governor's published in January of the preceding Fiscal Year. ORDERING OF MAINTENANCE SECTION 5. The public interest and convenience requires, and this legislative body does hereby order the maintenance work to be made and performed at the [existing or enhanced] level of maintenance as such level of maintenance is set forth and described in the Assessment Engineer's Report and as previously declared and set forth in the Resolution of Intention. FILING WITH CITY CLERK SECTION 6. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. FILING WITH THE COUNTY AUDITOR SECTION 7. The city Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing to be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August. ENTRY UPON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL SECTION 8. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. COLLECTION AND PAYMENT SECTION 9. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 SECTION 10. The assessments as above confirmed and levied 3 /~-g for these proceedings will provide revenue to finance the maintenance of authorized improvements in the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1999 and ending June 30, 2000. Presented by Approved as to form by Ov.- ~~ ~. John P. Lippitt, Director of John M. Kaheny, CiEy Attorney Public Works H:\home\attorney\reso\tcballot.tab 4 1~~1 n_ __ _ "___ _m___..._ " 1l. RESOLUTION NO. /q~~~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION AND ABANDONING THE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, has initiated proceedings for the levy of the annual assessment in a special maintenance district created pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Landscaping Act") , Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 et seq.) (the "Implementation Act") (the Landscaping Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Lawfl), in a special maintenance district known and designated as Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting District (hereinafter referred to as the "District") , and, WHEREAS, at this time all notice and public hearing requirements have been met relating to the levy of the annual assessments, and WHEREAS, the city Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report from the Assessment Engineer (the "Assessment Engineer's Report") and this City Council is now satisfied with the assessment and diagram and all other matters as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report as now submitted for final consideration and approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: RECITALS SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. PROCEDURES SECTION 2. This city Council hereby finds and determines that the procedures for the consideration of the levy of the assessments have been undertaken in accordance with the Assessment Law. ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES SECTION 3. Assessment ballots were mailed as required by Assessment Law to the record owners of all properties within the District which are proposed to be assessed. The assessment ballots 1 /:J--/¡) -- that were completed and received by the City Clerk prior to the close of the public hearing have been tabulated in accordance with the procedures established by Assessment Law and this City Council and the results of such tabulation have been submitted to this City Council. This City Council hereby finds that the assessment ballots submitted in opposition to the levy of assessments as shown in the Assessment Engineer's Report as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law exceed the assessment ballots submitted in favor of such levy also as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law. Therefore, a majority protest to the levy of assessments has been found to exist and no assessments shall be levied against properties within the District for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT SECTION 4. As a result of the existence of the majority protest to the levy of an annual assessment for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as proposed within the District, this City Council hereby orders the abandonment of the proceedings to authorize such levy. Presented by Approved as to form by Lippitt , Director of ú..- ~~ ~ John P. John M. Kaheny, C~ty Public Works Attorney H:\home\attorney\reso\townncen.abn 2 /~ -II - /7>Æ. RESOLUTION NO. /955#. . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, has initiated proceedings for the levy of the annual assessment in a special maintenance district created pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972"1 being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Landscaping Act") , Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 et seq. ) (the "Implementation Act") (the Landscaping Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Law") , in a special maintenance district known and designated as Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting District (hereinafter referred to as the "District") , and, WHEREAS, at this time all notice and public hearing requirements have been met relating to the levy of the annual assessments, WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report from the Assessment Engineer (the "Assessment Engineer's Report" ) and this City Council is now satisfied with the assessment and diagram and all other matters as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report as now submitted for final consideration and approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: RECITALS SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. PROCEDURES SECTION 2 . This City Council hereby finds and determines that the procedures for the consideration of the levy of the assessments have been undertaken in accordance with the Assessment Law. ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES SECTION 3. Assessment ballots were mailed as required by Assessment Law to the record owners of all properties within the 1 /~-/d- - District which are proposed to b~assessed. The assessment ballots that were completed and received by the City Clerk prior to the close of the public hearing have been tabulated in accordance with the procedures established by Assessment Law and the results of such tabulation have been submitted to this City Council. This City Council hereby finds that the assessment ballots submitted in favor of the levy of' assessments as shown in the Assessment Engineer's Report as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law exceed the assessment ballots submitted in opposition to such levy also as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law. Therefore, no majority protest to the levy of assessments within the District has been found to exist. DETERMINATION AND CONFIRMATION SECTION 4. The final assessment and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report, is hereby approved and confirmed. Based upon the Assessment Engineer's Report and the testimony and other evidence presented at the public hearing, the city Council hereby makes the following determinations regarding the assessments proposed to be imposed for Fiscal Year 1999-2000: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each individual parcel assessed has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the operations and maintenance expenses. b. The assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel. c. Only the special benefits have been assessed. There are no parcels within the District that are owned or used by a local government, the State of California or the United States. The assessments for the District contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report for the next fiscal year are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in such Assessment Engineer's Report. Assessments may be levied in next Fiscal Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter without further compliance with the assessment ballot procedures required under the Assessment Law at rates not to exceed the amounts levied in the preceding Fiscal Year subject to adjustment annually by the lesser of the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) or the change in the estimated fourth quarter per capita personal income as contained in the Governor's published in January 2 / J -/3 personal income as contained in the Governor's published in January of the preceding Fiscal Year. ORDERING OF MAINTENANCE SECTION 5. The public interest and convenience requires, and this legislative body does hereby order the maintenance work to be made and performed as said maintenance work is set forth in the Assessment Engineer's Report and as previously declared and set forth in the Resolution of Intention. FILING WITH CITY CLERK SECTION 6. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. FILING WITH THE COUNTY AUDITOR SECTION 7. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing to be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August. ENTRY UPON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL SECTION 8. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. COLLECTION AND PAYMENT SECTION 9. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 SECTION 10. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue to finance the maintenance of authorized improvements in the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1999 and ending June 30, 2000. Presented by Approved as to form by .. 'f Q.h~Þ-- John P. Llppltt, Dlrector 0 Jo n M. Kaheny, Clty Public Works Attorney H:\home\attorney\reso\bayblvd,tab 3 /J-/'-/ ___ W·_"._~~__.__ 1~· þ RESOLUTION NO. /95'5'~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION AND ABANDONING THE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, has initiated proceedings for the levy of the annual assessment in a special maintenance district created pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Landscaping Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ( "Article XI lID" ) and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 et seq. ) (the "Implementation Act") (the Landscaping Act, Article XlIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Lawfl) , in a special maintenance district known and designated as Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting District (hereinafter referred to as the "District ") 1 and, WHEREAS, at this time all notice and public hearing requirements have been met relating to the levy of the annual assessments, WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report from the Assessment Engineer (the "Assessment Engineer's Report") and this City Council is now satisfied with the assessment and diagram and all other matters as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report as now submitted for final consideration and approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: RECITALS SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. PROCEDURES SECTION 2. This city Council hereby finds and determines that the procedures for the consideration of the levy of the assessments have been undertaken in accordance with the Assessment Law. ASSESSMENT BALLOT PROCEDURES SECTION 3. Assessment ballots were mailed as required by Assessment Law to the record owners of all properties within the District which are proposed to be assessed. The assessment ballots that were completed and received by the City Clerk prior to the close of the public hearing have been tabulated in accordance with the procedures established by Assessment Law and this City Council and the results of such tabulation have been submitted to this City Council. /:J- - /5 This city Council hereby finds that the assessment ballots submitted in opposition to the levy of assessments as shown in the Assessment Engineer's Report as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law exceed the assessment ballots submitted in favor of such levy also as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law. Therefore, a majority protest to the levy of assessments has been found to exist and no assessments shall be levied against properties within the District for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS SECTION 4. As a result of the existence of the majority protest to the levy of an annual assessment for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as proposed within the District, this City Council hereby orders the abandonment of the proceedings to authorize such levy. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt, Director of O-~r John M. Kaheny, ity Attorney Public Works H:\home\attorney\reso\bayblvd.abn jJ--Jþ - -.:¡¡-- / d-- AnACHMENT A '\ :_ .:.: "" :.n,~ . ~.. 4- .. June1,1999 :'. -- ~ RECfi VID '" Elizabeth Chopp c: ., N .\;.~ -, ~ ~~ ,,' ~þ 'ò'\."'/ Dear Ms Chopp; "~~ 360 Third A venue This is to confirm your reciept of the motion made be the Downtown Chula Vista, CA 91910 Business Association this morning at their meeting ( attached is (619) 422-1982 copy of the motion), FAX I would also like to direct attention to your draft copy of the Council (619) 422-1452 agenda item and set some things straight that are contained in this document. First I must let you know that if I approach a subject such as this I am representing the Association and I have direction 1999 omeers & Directors from them to do SD, a few examples of this are in the report that YDU left, For instance on page 3 Jack Blakely was only telling what I President had been instructed to tell the staff by my Board or my Executive Eddie Chapman BDard, I would also like tD explain their concerns with page 3 and why it came about, The Downtown is as we all know a shopping Vice President district and does not shut down on weekends holidays etc, The Donna Vignapiano board was concerned that we were getting no service on weekends and particular during the week that the City takes off at the Holiday Secretary season, David Rossi Also on page 3 it is indicated that I suggest that we make the Treasurer District larger and that is true, but only because my board has Jim Fergus members all the way to H Street that want the same services as other members at F Street or E Street Past President I think that is the only input that I see should be explained in behalf David Rossi Df The Association and my behalf at this time. I am sure that Eddie Chapman the Association President and JanetCarranza property owner will be in touch with you to set up a meetring with Keiùt Hooper staff and property owners as soon as he can contact the owners. Dee Lerma Thank you fDr your time on this project and The Association and I Linda Rosas look forward to working with the City Dn this matteL Srella Sutton Betty Thompson ~ J ck Blakle~ Executive Director I ___ .._._______w_____ (f U/qq Motion Verification Date . Originator ~ð-/106- . . . 'f.'o \ Second t/¿JvtV\ C1 U 19 ,v4-p;~a . Motion ¡;;'~plthf ~~ 5e,V\!IU.s.- lEI U bf , c I ~A --::.,--:~ , lr C{...t v v t-vlT- , . fo/ ~ I . . ~SCV~ ~ llq~ ¡h~('( dL?::--/'- 'f L ~ Vote-tY;;- ~ \116 ::- D 7\ o =- (i _ '71- s,1 -. / ., '.' f ~~ (, V 1)ßJ1 . ..................... lö 'ßH1. c,,~fP /} /...-" A'nACHMENT B , ~ RESOLl'TIO\ \C! /.;~ ?'-1 . I / -' ) RESOLL"T10\ OF THE CITY COl'\CIL OF THE CITY OF CHL"LA "IST; DECLARING THE I1\TENT TO FORM THE TOW)\ CENTRE ...ND B.;y BOULEVARD L....NDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRJCTS. APPROVING THE PREUMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT, SETTING JULY '27, 1999 AT 6:00 P.M. AS THE DATE AND TIME OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDERING THE INIn.... TION OF BALLOT PROCEDURES WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF Chula Vista has previously formed special maintenance districts pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972". being Division 15. Part 2 of the Str~ts and Highways Code of the State of California (the" 1972 Act"), such distriCts known and designated as TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT ("Towne Centre District") and BAY BOULEVARD L....NDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT ("Bay Boulevard District") (Town Centre District and Bay Boulevard Disrrict may be referred to collectively a> the ··District>"): and WHEREAS. at this time the City Council desires to take proceedin1's pursuam to the 1972 Act. Anicle XIIID of the Constitution of th~ State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus ImplementaÜon Act I Government Cod~ Section 53750 and following) I the "lmplementaÜon Act·· I I the 1972 Act. Ande XIIID and the ImplementaÜon Ac! are referred to collecÜvely as the ,. Assessmem Law'·, to provide for th~ annual levy of assessment!' for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the cost> and expenses necessary to pay for the maintenance of the exisÜng improvements and proposed additional improvements in such Distric!5: and. WHEREAS. ther~ has b~n presented to this City Council th~ Assessmem Engineer's Report, as required by the Assessment Law, and this City Council desires to conúnue with th~ proc~dings for said annual levy; and, _ WHEREAS. this City Council-has now carefully examined and reviewed the Assessmem Engin~r's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documen!5 as set fonh therein, and is satisfied that the assessmen!5, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the special benefi!5 received Ïrom the improvemen!5 to be maintained, as set fonh in the Assessmem Engineer's Report and this City Council desires to preliminarily approve such repon. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DeclaraÜon of Imemion The public imerest and convenience requires. and it is th~ imemion of this legislarive body, to levy and collect assessments to pay the annual costS and expenses for the maintenance and/or servicing of the exisÜng improvemen!5 and proposed addiÜonal improvemen!5 for th~ Districts. The improvemen!5 proposed to be maintained in each respecÜve District are generally described as f01l0ws: Town Centre District Improvements on Third Avenue between "E" and "G" Streets: Various improvements located between the curb and building fron!5. including enhanced stamped concrete sidewalks and wal1.'Ways, raised planters, container planters. shad~ strucrures with vines. /? J - SECTJO'\ 6 PuhÌl.: Hea~mr 'Ot1:::t' l~ her~~: gi\'::n tha: publi: h~~ring~ fi)~ ::a:h D¡~::-j:: ~r:: h::r::by s:::heduJed in Ü1~ rt:'gula~ meeunf pla::e of thi~ J::gIsiauve' boc: lo::ateè a~ 276 Fourth A \'enu::. Ch~.ll... . \ïSLó. California 919]0 on the following dare and ume: July 27. 1999 at 6:00 p.m. At such rimes the legislative body will consid~r and fInally determine whether to levy the proposed annual assessment within each of th~ Districts. All interested persons shall be afforded the opporruniry to hear and be heard. The Ciry Council shall consider all oral Statements and all wrinen communications made or f1led by any imerested persons. The Ciry Council shall also d~tennine whether assessm~nt ballots submined pursuant to the Assessment . Law in opposition to the proposed assessments within each respective District exceed assessment baIlors submined in favor of such proposed assessments. Pursuant to the prO\'isions of the Assessment Law, each re"ord owner of property located within each respective DistricI proposed to be assessed has th~ righr to submit an assessment baIlor in favor of or in OpposiIion to the proposed assessment. , Assessment ballots will be mailed to the record owner of ea"h parcel located within each respe"Ii"e DisIricI and subjecr to a proposed assessmem. Each such owner may complete such assessment bailor and thereby indicate their suPPOrt for or opposl!ion to the proposed assessment. All su"h assessment baIlors may be debvered by mail or persona! delivery to the Ciry Clerk ar the fOllowing address at or before 5 :00 pm on July 27, 1999: City CJerk Ciry of Chula Vista 276 Founh Avenue Chula Vista,Ca 91910 --... After 5:00 pm on July 27, 1999, assessment ballots may be delivered prior to the cJose of the public hearing for the District for which the assessment bailor is being submined to the City CJerk at the lœarion of the public hearing given above. All assessments ballots for each DistricI must be re"eived by the City Clerk prior to the close of the public hearing for such District on July 27, J 999. A POstmark on an envelop returning an assessment baUot by mail which is postmarked prior to such date and time will not be sufficient. At the conclusion of the public hearing on July 27. 1999 for each respective District, the Ciry Council shall cause the assessmem ballots for such District which are timely received to be tabulated. If a majority protest exists within a Districr, the City Council shall nor impose an assessmem within thar District. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of such public hearing, assessmem ballots sqbmined in opposition to the assessments within a District exceed the assessmenr ballots submined in favor of such assessments. In tabulating the assessment ballots. the assessment ballots shall be weighted according to the proporrional financiaJ obligarion of the affected properry. SECTION 7. Notice of Public Hearin~ The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail notice pursuant to the Assessment Law of the public hearings and assessment ballot proceedings and the adoption of the Resolution of Intention and of the filing of the Assessment Engineer' s Reporr, together with the assessment - ~ · COL~Cn. AGE;"""DA STATEME;"¡ ltem~ Meeting Date 6/8/99 ITEM TITLE: Resolurion /9r3'ridarmg the inrenr to form the Town Centre and Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts, approving the preliminary Fn~ineer's Report, seTT;n~ the time and place for a public hearing and ordering the initiariDg of ballot procedures SUBMTITED BY' Di=w"" p,,¡,ti, Worlo ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manag~ ~ --" (4/5ths Vote: Ye5_No_XJ The Town Centre and Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting Districts were originally formed over 15 years ago by Council resolurion. Artide XIDD of the Consrirurion of the Stare of California., enacred by the approval of Proposition 218, provides that beginning JuJy I, 1997 all existing, new or increased assessments must comply with the provisions of this article. Certain classes of existing assessmenrs are exempr from the procedures of Artide XIDD. Following review of all of the City's mo;nte:nance assessment districts, staff has derermiDed that the Town CenlIe and Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighrin~ Districts may nOl be exempt from the provisions of Artide XTIID and therefore re::o=ends thar proceerìin~s be undertaken in conjuncrion with the annual levy of assessments for these districts to bring the assessmenrs into compliance with the provisions of Artide XIDD. RECOl\1ME1'¡D:~TION: -That CoUncil approve lliepreliminary En.,uineer's Repon.; direct the City Clerk to notice the public hearings for the Town Centre and Bay BouJevard Landscaping and Lighting Districrs for July 27, 1999 at 6:00 p.m., and order the initiarion of ballot procedures BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMME;"""DA nON: Nor applicable. DISCUSSION: Back~ound On November 13, 1979 the City Council accepred the landscape improvemenrs installed along Third Avenue between "E" and "F" Streers. The iniriaJ mainrenance cost was covered by a loan from the Redevelopment Agency, pending establishment of an Assessment District in accordance with the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972. A public hearmg was held and the District formation was authorized by Council on June 17, 1980. Cosrs were generally apportioned based on the footage of property facing Third Ave. and the assessed valuarion of each property. parcels between "F" and "G" SlIeets, which were slared to be redeveloped, were also induded in the District since ir was anticipared thar the improvements would be extended to these blocks. These properties were inirially assessed a nominal amount - generally between $10 and $40 per year. These amounrs were later increased after these properties were developed. ~ , -- "...- .'._ .__".W'___ _.. __n"___~" .__..._ _,,,n__.__.___n .. Page 2, Item_ . Meeting Date 6/8/99 Over the years, the Town Cemre District has be::n improved with new and enhanced landscaping. However, the amount of time spent by the Town Gardener to maintain the facilities within this district has decreased from 4.5 hours per day to 3.15 hours per day. This is due to the e,>panded workload involved in IDainraining the "H" Street Transit Center, Bay Boulevard Park, and the parking lots on Del Mar. Landis, and Center Sa-eets. . The facilities mainr"inl".{j by the Town Centre District include raised planters, container planters, shade structures with vines, supplemental tree pJanrings, landscaped covered bus stops. park benches, decorative street lamps, ornamental accent lighting in shade structures. decorative litter containers. ashtrays, enhanced stamped concrete sidewalks and wan..-ways and an outdoor decorative clock. These improvements extend along Tlrird Avenue from "E" Street to "G" Street. Memorial Park, which is located at Third Avenue and Park Way, is not included in the District and is not being maintained by the District. The Bay Blvd. Assessment District was established in 1982 IO maintain sa-eet Jighring and landscaping improvements installed that year on Bay Blvd. The District includes four large parcels along the east side of Bay Blvd. berween "E" and "F" Streets. The District maintain. the parkway plantings on the west side of Bay Boulevard from just south of the Nature Interpretive Center entrance at "E" Street IO T a~oon Drivel "F" Street. This parkway is composed of Acacia shrubs and paJm trees to visually buffer the businesses on Bay Blvd. from an open drainage course, freight train tracks, electric transmission towers and a sewage pump station. Additionally, the park located at the northwest corner of Bay Blvd. and Lagoon Drivel "F" Street is also maintained by the District. This park includes rwo separated lawn areas with picnic tables and tree. shrub and ground plJlI1tings. Proposition 218, which took effect on July I, 1997, requires that all existing, new or increased assessments comply with the act unless they fall under several exempted categories. Districts established for landscaping and lighting maintenance are not considered automatically exempt. AU other Open Space Districts established by the City of Chula Vista prior to the passage of Proposition 218 were established pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning alJ the parcels subject to the assessment, which entitles these districts to an exemption. Since the Town Centre and Bay Blvd. Assessment DistriCts were not established through such a petition or through voter approval, they are subject to Proposition 218 requirements. including preparation of a new Engineer's Report and condUCt an assessment ballot procedure which allows all owners of assessed parcels to submit assessment ballots in favor of or in opposition to the levy of assessments. Proposed District Assessments Since the levy of the assessments within these Districts must comply with the provisions of Article XITID, the method of allocating each properry' s fair share needs to be reevaluated to insure that it also complies with the substantive requirements of Article XITID. Based on the advice of the City's consulting attorney, Warren Diven, it was decided that use of parcel area would be a reasonable and justifiable method to spread the cost over the parcels. OriginaJJy the cost was spread over the parcels based on footage framing Third A venue and assessed value of each parceL , .. ,--, "" '-' ~ Page 3, Irem_ Meeting Date 6/8/99 Assessed value was not used because it is not considered to be a fair estimate of the benefit obtained from the improvements, and front footage was not used due to the irregular dimensions of some of the parcels. The level of service for the Bay Blvd. District is not proposed for change, since the City has not received any comments from property owners in this District. The annual expendiwre for this District is anticipated to be $15,491 for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. However, due to the large reserve in the Bay Blvd. Fund, the net collectible amount would only be $5,210, as shown in Anachmem A. The estimated cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) would decrease from $774 to $521. (Note that the number of EDUs is based on calculations for both Districts as previously formed and is included mainly as a method of comparison.) However, over the past year the DowntOwn Business Association, particu1arly Executive Director Jack BlakeJy, has expressed a desire to increase the level of service for the Town Centre District. including additional personnel hours. All =em property owners who are being charged for the Town Centre District were invited to a public meeting on March 27 conducted by City Open Space staff. Five people, who were both property owners and business owners, attended the meeting. Following a discussion explainin~ the need for an election and improvements desired in the District, staff requested that the property owners meet with the Downtown Business Association and compose a wish list of items they wished to see implemented within the District (Anachmem B). This list was incorporated into the City's cost estimate for annual Operation and Maintenance. Implementation of these improvements would increase the estimated annual cost from $45,422 in FIscal Year 1998-99 to $124,300. lithe improvements are oot implemented, the cost will increase slightly to $48,820. Comparisons with previous unit costs are shown in AnachmeritA.- - -------..- . .- Three properties on the south side of ~F" Street between Garren Avenue and Third Avenue (parcels Nos. 568-270-20, 568-270-27 and 568-270-30) were included in the original District but have a lower level of service and consequently a lower level of special benefit than the rest of the District, since the improvements in this area are limited to enhanced sidewalks, trees and ornamental lights. Three parcels on the north side of ~F"Street have the same type of improvements but are not included in the District and are maintained with City funds. In order to be equitable, Staff recommends that the three parcels facing "F" Street be removed from the District. District funds would not be expended to maintain these properties. Mr. Blakely has ilio requested that the City extend the boundaries of the Town Centre District south along Third Avenue to "H" Street. Although this would expand the assessment base, there is no justification for extending the district. Since the type of improvements consrructed between "E" and ~G" Streets are not included in the blocks between "G" and "H" Streets, the latter blocks do not derive a special benefit from the improvements north of ~ G" Street. In order to be included in the District, a special zone would need to be established for the streets south of ~G" Street to pay for improvements in this area. This would not result in a significant reduction for the area north of ~G" Street, and the property owners south of "G" Street would not be likely to vote in ,'/ 7 . -. _.-~-~._._-- --,_.-~ ~ . Page 4, Item_ Meeting Date 6/8/99 favor of assessing themselves for maintenance of improvements the City is currently fInancing. The Preliminary Engineer's Reports (Attachments C and D) include Plats showing the boundaries for each district, the budget for each district and separate spreadsheets for the proposed assessment amounrs (the budget for Fiscal Year 1999-2000) and paymcm amounrs (the billable amounrs which . take into account the fund balance). The Town Centre District includes budgets and spreadsheets for both the "as is" option and the enhanced service option. The annual assessmc:nt amount wilJ be adjustable by the lesser of the January to January San Diego Metropoliran Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) or the change in the estimated fourth quaner per capita personal income as contained in the Governor's budget published in January. This is consistent with our adm;ni<rration of the City's other Open Space/ Landscaping and Lighting Districts and with Municipal Code Section 17.07.035. According to Proposition 218, the City is required to mail assessmem ballots Stating the proposed assessmem amounts to all record property owners at least 45 days in advance of a public hearing. at which the City shall consider all protests against the assessment and tabulate the assessment ballots. The assessment ballots shall be tabulated in proportion to the fInancial obligations of the individual property owners. The assessment can be imposed if the majority of the weighted vote - for the ballots submitted is in favor of the assessmc:m. The assessmem ballot for the Town Centre District wilJ be a two-step process which wilJ allow the properry owners to vote for either no assessment (and no District), the "as is" alternative, or the enhanced service alternative. If the majority of pro perry owners by weighted vote select ~no" on their assessment ballots, the City.has. the option to either discontinue maintenance of the improvemems ·or to find other sources -...---- - - - -- . -.- . of funding for this work, such as the general fund. If this should occur, staff recommends that the City discontinue m~;nt"nance but assist the propen:y owners and! or business owners in setting up a method for arranging for this work to be performed and bilJed. Mr. Blakely has previously discussed with the City the possibility of having the Downtown Business Association contract for the maintenance work in the Town Centre area. The Dowmown Business Association has also brought up the possibility of having the Downtown Business Association contract for the m~int"nance but have the City bill the properry owners. It may be legally permissible for the City to enter into a contract with the Business Association for the performance of the maintenance work, provided that the establishment of the District is approved by the ballot procedure. This is a separate issue and can be considered next fIscal year. Staff members attended the meeting of the Downtown Business Association on June 1, 1999 to discuss the alternatives and the balloting process for the Town Centre District. A motion was passed requesting the City to utilize contract services in lieu of current City staff for m~;nt"nance work in the District in order to keep costs down. The use of COntract services was induded in the additional staff estimate for the enhanced services option, although prevailing wage scales were assumed. Staff wilJ explore lower cost staffmg options next [¡scal year. However, insufficient /7\ I { , . -./ · Page 5, Item_ Meeting Date 6/8/99 information is available at this time to enable such cost reductions to be reflected in the amount stated on the propeny owners' ballots. mCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts associated with a ~yesft vote for the Bay Blvd. Disnict or a ~yes" vOte on the ~as is" option for the Town Centre District, since these choices will basically maintain to status quo. A ~yes" vote for the Town Centre enhanced service option will increase the expenditures but have no net effect on the City, since these costs would be paid by the properry owners. A ~noft vote could have a fiscal impact if Council decides to pay for some or all of the maintenance costs. This ~n"]]~1 impact is esrimared at $64,311, based on the ~as is" option for Town Centre. AttaChments: A. Estimate of Maintenance Cost: Bay Blvd. and Town Centre Open Space Districts B. Memorandum from the Downrown Business A.ssociation C. Pr::liminary Engineer's Repon for Bay Blvd. Open Space District D. Preliminary Engineer's Repon for Town Centre Open Space District H:\HOME\ENGINEERIAGE"IDA \ TOWNCTR.EMC Oï25-30-CFDOO H:\HOME'.£1t.1GINEER\AGEND^\TOWNCTR.EMC ------. _.- .-------..-- - -----.. - --_.--- -- ----- - 1/ , j /- ....-.. .-." .---.--....----....-..--.-.. · · · This page blank ,/7 . r;,L../ , .. ATTACHMENT C- r,Qm: Tne Do",mown 5usiness Associatioe To: Whom it may conce=n Tne following items. the Downtown Business ..'\ssociation feds n~d to be addressed. to help improve the atmosphere of the downtov.11 area. Tnis is our "wish list". Please pass. this to the appropriate departments in which the specific responsibilities lie: 1. PLMTIRS: a) Remove all dead plants. b) Plant COLORFUL flowers throughout downtown. Not just one type offJowe:-. but various types of flowers. c) Repair or replace broken planters. d) Plant seasonal flowers/plants (i.e. Winter, Spring, Summer &.. Fall). e) Separare planters throughout the downtown area, too many are "linked" linked together. f) Paint planters. bring color to downto"'itl. g) Cente:-, level or removeimove planter on comer of 3rd A venue and Center Street. h) Planter on comer of 3rd Avenue anè "E" Stre~t neeås to be centered and leveìed. 1. COBR..\'S: a) All cobra's bases need to be painted, they look shabby next to the recently painred "ornamental" lights. b) Various cobra's lights are bW1led our throughout the downtown area and need replacing. - --- '-.-- - -_. - _d 3. PARKING SIGNS: a) Parking sign missing near bus stop on the corner of Fuddrucke:-s. (Replace) b) Parking sign missing in front ofCal-West Trophies. (Replace) c) Parking sign in the center of3rd Avenue (on the grass in front of Fuååruckers:J needs to be repainted and stand poles need replacing. 4. TRELLIS': a) -,\II lights need to be checked. b) Trellis at Northeast comer of 3rd and "F" needs to be repaired. c) Trellis at Southeast side (by old Standlee's) light breaker kicks off. leaving area àark. , 5. MISCELLA.,"iEOUS: a) Steam clean sidewalks on a regular basis. b) All street sign lights (ie. Third Avenue. "E" Street, etc.) are burned out and need to be replaced. c) Replace broken trash cans throughout the downtown area. ¡ß - .......- .-- ~ -_...'-'.- -.-..--.-,.,.....--.- . . C. i Com~:- signal iight on 3rd and "Fit S:.-~=: :1~::ds ;J3.::;tin;. ~i Omarne:1talligh¡ in f~an! oÎ StaI1dl~~5 :'i:1siòe 0: doubìe ligh:) :'u."":1::: UU: a..ì':: needs to be replaced. f) Give a spare set of keys to ourlet eìe:!:ical box covers throughout d0"TIto"''' to the Downtown Business Associarion. g) Replace NO SKATEBOARDf.\iG signs throughout downtown 3rd Avenue. many are faded OUL d ' , I.... / ,I ATTACHMENT D ENGINEER'S REPORT BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT July 6, 1999 ____no . - - ________ -- -- -- - - -- -~- ------ -- -- --.--- -----...-- - ------ -- - --- / /'7 -- ...-. · BAY BOCLEVARD LA.1\,¡L>SCAPING A.1\,¡L> LIGlITING DISTRICT Introduction The Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting District was originally established in 1982 by resolution of the Chula Vista City Council, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in order to pay for maintenance of improvements insraJled that year on Bay Boulevard. These · improvements consist of the following: 1. Maintenance of the parkway on the west side of Bay Boulevard between from just south of the Nature Interpretive Center entrance at "E" Street to Lagoon Drivel "F" Street. This parkway is composed of Acacia shrubs and Canary Island pine trees. Street lighting is also included. 2. Maintenance of the park located at the northwest comer of Bay Boulevard and Lagoon Drivel "F" Street. This park includes two separated lawn areas with picnic tables and tree, shrub and ground plantings. There is also a small planted area on the northeast · comer of "F" Street and Bay Blvd. Area lighting is also included, The District is located in the City of Cbula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California as depicted on the boundary map included as Exhibit A herein. A map of this District was recorded in the office of tfte City Engineer on June 13, 1989. No changes are being proposed to the District boundaries. The parcels being assessed for this District are as follows: APN 567-021-29 .. APN 567-021-38 -..- - --..----" .. APN567-02T-37 · APN 567-021-36 Proposition 218, which took effect on July 1, 1997, requires that all existing, new or increased assessments comply with the act unless they fall under several exempted categories. Districts established for landscaping and lighting maintenance are not considered automatically exempt. Since this District was not originally established pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all the parcels subject to the assessment or through voter approval, levy of assessments within the District is subject to Proposition 218 requirements, including preparation of a new Engineer's Report and conducting an assessment ballot procedure among all property owners. · Cost Estimate The cost estimate for maintenance of this District is shown on Table 1. The Total Budget Amount I ,I /0 · for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is estimated to be $15,491. This estimate is based on the City's experience of the annual maintenance work required. This maintenance work shall include. but not be limited to, the furnishing of services and materials needed to maintain the landscaping and lighting, including irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating the landscaping for disease and injury; the removal of solid wasre; the furnishing of water for irrigation and electricity for lighting and the irrigation system; and repairing the lighting and irrigation system_ With the exception of trash collection and disposal, which is done by Laidlaw, all other labor will be performed by City staff. Rate and Method of Apportionment An assessment has been calculared annually for the properties included within the District and billed to the properry owners on the County tax bill. The method of apportionment of the District's costs to the properties has been reviewed and it was decided that use of parcel area would be a reasonable and justifiable method to spread the cost over the parcels to reflect the special benefit received by such parcels from the improvements being maintained. All parcels are classified for commercial land use. Table 2 shows how the total annual cost for this District would be distributed among the four parcels. The Rate of Assessment for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is $2424.26 per acre. . This rate shall be increased every fIScal year thereafter by the lesser of the annual percentage increase, if any, in the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (all items) or the annual percentage increase,' if any, in the California Fourth Quarter Per Capita Personal Income as contained in the Governor's budget published every January. These factors are currently being used for the City's other Landscaping and Lighting Distticts. --..--- The Rate of Assessment recalculated for each Fiscal Year will be the maximum rate billable to the properry owners. The end of year Operating Fund Balance and the Reserve Fund Requirement will need to be taken into account when dererm;ninE the actual billing amounts for the fiscal year. The Reserve Fund is a fund or account that shall be maintained for the District in order to provide necessary cash flow for operation and mainrenance during the first six months of the fIScal year, working capital to cover maintenance and repair cost overruns or unanticipated maintenance expenses and funding shortfalls resulting from delinquencies that may arise in connection with the collection of the assessments. The Reserve Fund Requirement shall be a minimum of 50 percent and a maximum of 100 percent of the Total Budget Amount for the upcoming fiscal year. Should there be insufficient funds available to cover a 50 percent Reserve Fund Requirement, the reserve percent shall be as high as allowable at the Rare of Assessment for the upcoming fiscal year. The amount billable to parcels within the District for each fiscal year will therefore be calculated as follows; 2 /7 - · (Total Budget Amount) + (Reserve Fund Requirement) - (Operating Fund Balance) = (Total Billable Amount) AI''ffi (Total BiIJable Amount) = Billing Rate; which shall be less than or equal to the (Total number of Acres) Rate of Assessment The billable amounts for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 are shown in Table 3 for all parcels in the · District. Based on a 100 percent reserve, the total revenue needed is $5,210. The Billing Rate is $815.336 per Acre. This billing rate is permissible, since it is less than the Rate of Assessment. · --_.- - ". - - - -.----~_.~ - --~ ------- -- --- -- --- h: \home\engineer\asmtdist\osds\bbengr .emc " .J /' // I EXHIBIT A ! : . I - I - ( , '. - ! -, l I I I I i I . II i .·1 . f ·1 I 'I ii, . , ' 'I i ' I - I I, ~ ¡ ~ 'I I ¡ "-,,. ¡: C - . D/5ïR/Cï ~ I ;. '" I, ¡ EOUNDAZ'( I j' I ¡I I j'f .. I -- ~~:~;IY'E_ \ II I I i l! ¡ Ii· ,c.=:;,~:-·;zANI 1 )..11 I 1\1 !.: J " .\ II I" = 't' - I - I ~ (5~7-C2¡-29) "'I! i = I . I' 'I ! Y , ! 1'1 .. I;" -------1', ~I , ¡ ,Ii ~ . -J .\ '"II I I \" J : DAYS INt.; -...!¡I· I: ; II ~ MCïC,! \\ LlJ¡! III" ! L~ÐG = - \ I [\, ; , 'I' I ~ '-<-I· I· 0' I \,1 Ii ,I ." \J..I' I I - ! Á/-./:7.-:.2 i ¡: i : :~ ( -~ ",_I --) .' I I Ii! i ~ . , ~ ' I I I ,j .,tN ::>00' . ^. ,,,'. ,:~, 11'\r--'. ," "'1 ~ 1_ - EL ïCiRlïC =. 1,4:1 R=STAVp'..c.;.// I I: ~ I i t.:J i.... : ; ~ Ii \C.--é7"OZ¡- ~7) l :. ~ II - ~ " ': ~ I' I I , , II ".--' ~ Ii ! I 'so!.''::: I ¡ I , .:xc.;.¡¡;;'/{;= \J') II I; ! . C( II Ii: 0 f I ,'1 ' i I ~!I . II ~Ii I I [' ! II C/ïy' II I I ~ PARK' ! I ¡ ~ I I ¡ I ! II /I F ,,- I I II S T. ~ .". 1 \ I Ii I II ¡a - \ II 1- - \ ! - - I' _ ~ ¡: I! . I - J , ' . I '1 1'4 i ¡. ! i :: ~ {i ¡ ~ D"~""9" I 71Cc~ ·f J' ______~. ""/",/,._ ",...._.--..___ ,r _...' "_ J _ _ _ _ _ ~ Ie, J -.., I ,/ _ _, I I I J. ~!': ~" 4 .:...,...-'-' I':"";':"" ... _/ "-",, 1<- _ _.' L c: /-: i ¡ ..'" ~ r, ... -" f D~C~ - ~? - ~ L " . I ~ .- fA r·- !V·,t '^/ - - '¡< v/" D I '" - - I C -/ I ! ---_..:;;..:...-...:?-.:!2.Sr__ .....,,¡....:::c- ,,c './"'1,' /J;;'\'r' _E ,'=;;,.(, ; _._..... . ..··H·_...····_·· .. ..__,,_~. TABLE 1 ~L~TEN.~~CESERVICES BAY BLVD. LA1"IDSCAPI:'iG Ac"ID LIGHTING DISTRICT Electricity for lighting and irrigation system $961 Trash collection and disposal $475 Irrigation water $:!.834 Town Gardener salary and benefits $7,060 City administrative costs $2.781 Certification ofbackflow preventer devices $120 Landscaping supplies $850 Maintenance materials: low volume irrigation emitters $230 Public noticing $180 TOTAL: $15,491 _. ____ ______._.._____, - ,___,__, ~ ________. __.__ ._.______..__. __._____ .0'_- .---- -~-_._----_..- ----- --,----_. h:\home\engineer\asmtdistlbbtab l.eme /~~j v TABLE 2 BAY BLVD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT - BUDGET FOR CURRENT SERVICE Parcel Number Site Address Acreage Assessed AmDunt 567-O21·29 215 Bay Blvd. 1.24 $3,006.08 567-021-36 225 Bay Blvd. 2.12 $5,139.43 567-021-37 271 Bay Blvd. 1.74 $4,218.21 567-021-38 285 Bay Blvd. 1.29 $3,127.30 6.39 $15,491.00 h:\home\bethc\baybl. wb3 --- -.-- ----~~- .~ - --------..-..-- -. --_._-'-- '---, -.--- .--. -- - - --- - -. ---_.~-- - ------- ~ , vi·/ -- ----_._--_..._~_. .... ..-----.......---.....-...--.-- · TABLE 3 BAY BLVD. LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT BilLING FOR CURRENT SERVICES CONSIDERING RESERVES Parcel Number Site Address Acreage Assessed Amount 567-021-29 215 Bay Blvd. 1.24 $1,011.02 567-021-36 225 Bay Blvd. 2.12 $1,728.51 567-021-37 271 Bay Blvd. 1.74 $1,418.68 · 567-021-38 285 Bay Blvd. 1.29 $1,051.78 6.39 $5,210.00 · h:lhomelbethclbaybI1.wb3 · ---~---- ----------- --- -- -_...~_.._".._._--_.._--_._---_._----- -.- --- - ---- · · /'. - . / .;/"\/""'\ A1TACHMENT E; ENGINEER'S REPORT TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING . DISTRICT .~ ____~. . ...... - July 6 1999- - "'- -.. ------_..... ------- --::-- -...---:,,--,-------- ---..-----:---:-.- -_._~-:.~. - --_.."':- ,., 'J-- t/")J --"---'-- ......-.-..- ",'.-."".'-'---- . TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT Introduction On November 13, 1979 the Chula Vista City Council accepted the landscaping improvements installed on Third Avenue between "E" and "F" Streets. A public hearing was subsequently held and the formation of an Assessment District in accordance with the T Jlnrlc:r'iping and Lighting Act of 1972 was authorized by Council on June 17,1980. Additional improvements were subsequently constructed on Third Avenue between "F" and "G" Streets and along "F" Street between Third and Garrett Avenues. These improvements included the following: 1. Improvements on Third Avenue between "E" and "G" Streets: Various improvements located between the curb and building fronts, including enhanred stamped concrete sidewalks and walkways, raised planters, container planters, shade structures with vines, supplemental tree plantings, landscaped covered bus stops, park benches, decorative street - lamps, ornamental accent lighting in shade structures,- decorative litter containers, ashtrays and an outdoor decorative clock. 2. Improvements on "F" Street between Garrett and Third Avenues (south side of street): Supplemental tree plantings, enhanced concrete sidewalks, decorative street lamps . A revised map' of this district was prepared in 1985 which identifies parcels within the current boundaries. It inCludes the parcels along Third Avenue between "E" and "G" Street, with the exception of the City Park, and three parcels along "F" Street which do not have frontage on Third Avenue: Assessor's Parcel Numbers 568-270-20, 568-270-27 and 568-270-30. .--- --- . . ---- - --- ---------- -------------- _.~. ~~-Pioposrtioii-2I 8: wlïìdi·toöfiffecfonTufy 1; 1997, 'requires that all-eXìStirig~ new 'or-increased assessments comply with the act unless they fall under several exempted categories. Districts established for landscaping and lighting maintenance are not considered automatically exempt. Since this District was not originalJy established pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all the parcels subject to the assessment or through voter approval, levy of assessments within the District is subject to Proposition 218 requirements, including preparation of a new Engineer's Report and conducting an assessment ballot procedure among all property owners. District Boundaries During the process of refonning the District, a number of issues were considered. The first issue pertained to the establishment of zones within the District. The level of improvements adjacent to the three properties which front "F" Street is significantly lower than for the properties fronting Third Avenue. There seemed to be two options: establish a separate zone for the three "F" Street 1 ~I ~ - parcels or eliminate these parcels from the District. It is recommended that these three parcels be eliminated from the District due to the difficulty and expense invoJved in dividing the costs and keeping separate records for a zone with three parcels and the fact that the parcels on the north side of "F" Street, which have similar improvements, have not been included in the District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 1999-2000, funds obtainéd from the assessments for this District will no longer be used to maintain the City improvements in front of these properties. The revised District boundaries are shown on Exhibit A, along with current parcel numbers. Cost Estimates Based on input from property and business owners, two level of service options for maintenance - of the improvements were identified for the Town Centre District. It is recommended that both options be presented to the property owners for consideration in the ballot process. The first option is considered the "As Is" Option since it involves the same improvements and the same level of maintenance currently performed. The Total Budget Amount for this option for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is estiInired to be $48,812, as shown on Table 1. This estimate is based on the City's experience of the annual maintenance work required. The maintenance work shall include, buf not be Jimited to; the furnishing of services and materials necessary to maintain the plaD.tings and·other amenities, including irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating the pJantings for disease and injury; the furnishing of water for irrigation and electricity for lighting, the irrigation system and the cJock; steam cJeaning the sidewalks; painting the benches and other improvements; replacing trash can liners and receptacles; and repairing the lighting and irrigation -. - - . system. With the exception óf side'IValk_steains:IeaIlÍI1j¡,all Qthecworkhasbeendone by City . ----- -=-_stãfL.:==-=-_ __ __--- ...- .. .- -----..-- -.---- .-.-~~- -~-.--.,.-- ---- -~---- -_.--- - - ---- - The "Enhanced Service" Option incJudes both the "as is" services and the additional enhancements shown on Table 2. These enhancements incJude seasonal plaD.tings, additional labor for cJeanup and litter control, additional painting of street lights and planters, additional signage, a contract with an electrician for maintenance of accent lighting, streetlamp lens replacement, replacement of concrete litter containers and repair of the trellises. The cost of these enhancements is $75,471. Therefore, the total cost of the Enhanced Service Option is $48,812 + $75,471 = $124,283. Rate and Method of Apportionment An assessment has been calculated annually for the properties incJuded within the District and billed to the property owners on the County tax bill. The method of apportionment of the District's costs to the properties has been reviewed and it was decided that use of parcel area 2 r·'~ /- ,n.J --"_.._-- - would be a reasonable and justifiable method to spread the cost over the parcels to reflect the special benefit received by such parcels from the improvements being maintained. All parcels are classified for commercial land use. Separate tables have been prepared to show how the total annnal costs associated with each option would be distributed and assessee! to all the parcels in the District. Table 3 shows the breakdown per parcel for the As Is Option, while Table 4 shows the breakdown per parcel for the Enhanced Services Option. The Rate of Assessment for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is as follows: As Is Option: $0.095222 per square foot (SF) of parcel area Enhanced Services Option: $0.24245 per square foot (SF) of parcel area The rate for the option selected by ballot shall be increased every fiscal year thereafter by the Jesser of the annual percentage increase, if any, in the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (all items) or the annual percentage increase, if any, in the California Fourth Quarter Per Capita Personal Income as contained in the Governor's budget . published every January. These factors are currently being- used for the City's other Landscaping and Lighting Districts. Although the Enhanced Services Option shows a reduction in cost of $4, 160 after the first year . it is not recommended that the total assessment be reduced by this amount because this amount is only 3:3 percent of the total assessment and it is likely that other minor improvements will be requested or required in future years. -- -- The Rate of Assessment recalculated for each Fiscal Year will be the maximum rate billabJe to the property owners. The end of year Operating Fund Balance and the Reserve Fund Requirement , . willneedìa be taken into account when determining thealè.111,,1 bi1liTJgiUJlQuntsJor .the.1iscal year. . -.. - - ---- --...--- ---.- : The.Reserve Fund ii"i fiiIId or-account:thatshall be maintained for the-Districtinorder to provide· necessary cash flow for operation and maintenance during the flfst six months -of the fiscal year, working capital to cover maintenance and repair cost overruns or unanticipated maintenance expenses and funding shortfalls resulting from delinquencies that may arise in connection with the collection of the assessments. The Reserve Fund Requirement shall be a minimum of 50 percent and a maximum of 100 percent of the Total Budget Amount for the upcoming fiscal year. Should there be insufficient funds available to cover a 50 percent Reserve Fund Requirement, the reserve percent shall be as high as allowable at the Rate of Assessment for the upcoming fiscal year. . The amounl billable to parcels within the District for each fiscal year will therefore be calculated as follows: (Total Budget Amount) + (Reserve Fund Requirement) - (Operating Fund Balance) = (Total Billable Amount) AND 3 . /~/ /(:l /~(. (Total BiJlable Amount) = Billing Rate; which shall be less than or equal to the (Total number of Acres) Rate of Assessment The billable amounts by parcel for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 are shown in Table 5 for the As Is Option and Table 6 for the Enhanced Services Option. The results are summarized belo';¥: Qption Total Revenue Needed Reserve Percent Billin~ Rate As Is $12,012 100 $0.023433/ SF Enhanced Services $119,455 65 $0.233032/ SF Since the Billing Rate for each option is less than the Rate of Assessment for the same option, the Billing Rates are pennissible. --- -~_.~.._--' --..----. ---~- --- .- ----- --- - - --- --- ---- _.._~ -- ---. - -- - --- _.~-- " - -~_.- - ---_._._.---~_.~-- '--'~'-"--'--~ --'.'." --._..- ----- ---~ -._.- --_.--------- ---.---- ---'--' -- ----- _.."-- --- --- h: \horne\engineer\asrntdist\osds\tcengr .ernc 4 }7 - --------.-.--- .-------...------..---- · · · · ---- ----- ----- _. --- - ---------- -_. -- .- -..-- --.-.----. -' -.-- -- -- .-- -- · 5 /7/'. · /(; :7". ~ , Sheet , of ~ R~~1 EXHIBIT  51 i . ~::.ô ~,_- .,. / ..----. ~i~ ' , " ~ .' ~. .. . /, N / " 'tl.. ~i~.I)ô·. ." - , . 1 _______ ------- .~ .~. ./ -------" ... "~" .",/ - ------- \~1.\ \ \ " \ __ - ,\' \ \ --- ",-,,- \~., \ ~i~.s:fó \ ____ , -- . ~ ' ,:::----:;, W E .- -- - -~--- \, ~\ ;,' ,\~\2 \ ._-- ,,' _---- ~9 ' \~\ ---- ," ",' .~, '. J~_\:?>..------- ~,~ß~, -- \ . \ ..- ' ,--' \ " '. .----------- ------- ' ".' ,,- - ---- .~. .-l., \,~\ "..___ ----- S ' // /. ',~~ß ... :s: \~" ... /__ ".~. . , " .- - " . .,.,...., \ - - .- ~>---- \~" ~ '. " :,6&-07~-'ß \. ,,/ ./" -- "" , . ~'4 'CJ.~.. ..--/ /__/ /~' ,:,6&-01"··". /'__ //- .____\~m ...~.. _/' __// ":\B.' .. ,~ , - .,u ". \~~. S ~..~/;;....-- '¡ " . ( , -- .',.- \~SO~, \a .---- .~ - ~ ---------- ~', . \~\ /..-- ',--------- ~ ..' \:{I/];· . ~ß'.I)4 " ____ ..-- --- ' _______ \ ø ., .. '. ~ \~\ __, ..___ \\. ," " "----- '.---- . .... /.. .....-::---: \ ¿: ~\. // ---....------; '.. " ø~'51:-'l " .. . _ ~\ .. / _________ -DI5"fRICT BOUNDA'fIY ~\ ~~, ~. ,.' - ---0_- -". '. ~'51:-" ~\. _______ ----.~. ."~" c. . ~,________-- . -- -------- ß ' \~.J:ß -------- . . . 52-\ . t\\ ~\ _ .--- '.~.'...-,--- --.- ", '\0 _ ___ ..--/ ----- --------- \ 1 '.. \. ø'6'I- . ___/ , --- _____.. ,52-'. \::::-----:: _____ ,,---- '-/ \~.,. ~ß~-" --' , .--- ----- .. 52-':?> " \~. - . '~. .---- -------- ---- \, \ :'\6\~\'l -- ''\6 ~ s&fr / - _______. ,,,Zoo .. '~ '~. \~ ...------ -/,..-" .----- .~. '.~. / .' , _______ '~ \ ,,6ß: " .,. -- , '\, , ----- ------- ,-. " :ff!!; . , ,ß~.Zß , _ -------- /' .___ ,,,Z.I)9 '. ~., / --- ----- ..~. .. -3".____- ----- --- ... 52.I)ß" \? . 'ø\·. \ ,.___ \~,. ------- \ \~., 1 --- ' . ..!Ý9-' € __ \ \':f/ØZ---;1R € -----..-- " ~ ~IIS C . II /' . - q --. I ;:'JI ;:' N'"' JO-OO9 ---- . -- _. OWN :'1': DooM. Wolfe TOWN CENTRE STREET LIGHTING' & D:.'7::: 5/26/99 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ,·___····_·,.u._ _ __"".._ '_U'_ Sheet 2 Of 2 C" ", - -A :s:. - - - ~ -- 2.10-2.'\ 0 _~ _ - ~.;¡6'ò- ____ / -- c€.'- D ?¡>.?' / O",,~e :,\"'íÍ ~ . 10-2.2. -, -"- 5'ò-2. /---- _ 5 ~~ o _ ~-- ~. ... ~ -------- '"' -----< . ~ ~ .. 2.3 .. c.' ~ --;:) . 'ò.2.10- -' ï\\ / » 55 . //---- ____ ':ß . -:--/ -- /--- . .!J~ . DISTRICT BOUNDARY - 5 - ..------.,-------.--p.C€.1.:. . u.-__ i::-o~- - -. -- .u. ;",,~€.Q-----f~ ___ . , ~. .. -- C\"'íÍ "-"_ >- N ____//-------~ p..'{ ...--/ ? p..R\Z ------ W E /" ..-- '" ~ ----- (;¡ ___ 'b " ----- -, --- "s ----------- ~ \ ---- . --------. 'C-1'" .----: . \ -:-. \ x:. t.- \ ,..---- ~. \ S-1'"~ ~.. . . ", \ ------ '. '. ..-- ."'- \\ G . r . \ '---~', " -- " .~_..-- . ~GtJ -~/ I FILE: NO. JO-OC DWN :T: D.M.Werfe TOWN CENTRE STREET LIGHTING & u~:õ::: 5/26/99 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT , TABLE 1 "AS IS" SERVICES TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT Professional Services $3,700 Electricity for lighting, irrigation system, clock $5,429 lITigation water $2,480 Town G¡n-dener salary and benefits $]7,975 City administrative costs . $7,058 Sidewalk steam cleaning contract $8,100 Certification ·of backflow preventer devices $]20· Other contract services $],920 Landscaping supplies $600 Other commodities:tfashcan linèrs, replacement of trash receptacles . $ I ,250 Public Noticing $180 . TOTAL: $48,812 -- -- .~- --0-'" _ . -..- -----,----- -- - -_.._--- ------ ---.--. ,. ~- ._~-"-'- .---- _._-~ ~_._----- - ---- .- h:\home\engineer\asmtdist\osds\tctab I .eme 3/ ._m.___.... _____. .__a________ TABLE 2 ADDITIONAL ENHANCEMENTS FOR TOWN CENTRE DISTRICT 1. Planters and plantings a. Seasonal4x/yr supplemental "color" pJantings $/replant x frequency/yr = $/yr $3,360 x 4 = $13,440.00/yr b. Paint planters.. ...... ................. .$800.00/yr c. Relocation ofplanters..................$2,500.00 Ix ongoing cost/yr.............. .$500. OO/yr d. Replacement of large planters..2/yr....$6,000.OO/yr #/yr x $/unit = $/yr 2 x 3,000.00 = $6,000.OO/yr SUBTOT AL:$2Z, 740 2. Painting projects a. Supplemental street lights (decorative) ............... .$2,500.00/yr b. Cobra type street light ..................$1,315.00/yr . . - - . SUBTOTAL: $3,815 3. Signage a. Parking signs $40 x 3 = $120 + pole work $200 = $320.00 -- b:N<!-skateþQar¡:!ÍJ1g.signs n. ------- _. --" 40.00 ea x 8 # = $320;{)()·firstyear $160:00fyrongoing· SUBTOTAL: $640 .. 4. Lighting a. Electrician contract to maintain all accent lighting in trellises and bus stops, includes cost of bulbs and fixtures........ .............. .............. ..$2,500.00/yr b. Decorative streetlamp lens replacement program. Schedule once every three years replacement. cost/unit x total # units divided by 3 years = $ / year (installed) $36.19 x 105 = $3,800 / 3 = $1,266/yr SUBTOTAL: $3,766 . 5 . Litter containers concrete container replacement schedule #/yr x $/unit = $/yr 3 x $350.00 = $1,050.00/yr SUBTOTAL: $1,050 /,---1 "._ c3P( . 6. Additional staffmg requirements a. Additional labor for enhanced planter @ prevaiJing wage hrs/yr x $/hr - $/YR. 830 hrs/yr x $18.00 = $14,940.oo/yr b. Additional labor for clean up and litter control @ prevailing wagé. hrs/yr x $/hr = $/YR 1,250 x $18.00 = $22,500.00 c. Overtime for special events #1 events x # hrs x prevailing wage rate x OT factor = $/yr 10 x 4 hrs/event x $18 x 1.5(x) = $I,080.00/yr d'H Holiday (double time rate) #lholidayslyr x $Ihr x #lhrs/holidayxholiday rate = $/year 5 x $18.00 x 8 hr x 2.0 (x) = $I,440.00/yr SUBTOTAL: $39,960 7. Trellis RepaiT and Replacement . In 1998 th.e trellis' were used as}'latformsforlighted Chrisrmasdecorations and found to be structurally inadequate to support the weight of lighting technicians: # trellises -x costlreinforcement= $ cost of improvement 7 x . $500.00 _ - . - = $3,500.00 ongoingyearly cost: redo 3 each year = 3 x 500 = $I,500.00/yr. SUBTOTAL: $3,500 -- ----. -- - - - ---------- -- -- ---,- TOTACt<'m:STYEAR:$7S;471- ..._-~- ---- Total Subsequent Years: $71,311 h: Ihome\engineer\asmtdist\osds\tcenhanl.mem 33 .....-......- TABLE 3 TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT - BUDGET FOR "AS IS" OPTION 568-044-23 300 E Street 90.5 115 10407.5 $991.02 568-044-22 208-12 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $547.53 568-044-21 , 214-18 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $547.53 568-044-20. 222 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $547.53 568-044-19 224 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $547.53 568-044-18 226 Third Ave. 61.4 115.1 7067.14 $672.95 568-044-17. 230 Third Ave. 23 115.2 2649.6 $252.30 568-044-16 232 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $548.48 568-044-15 234 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $548.48 568-044-14 236 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $548.48 568-044-13 242-44 Third Ave. 45 115.2 5184 $493.63 568-044-12 248 Third Ave. 40 115 4600 $438.02 568-071-01 201 Third Ave. 100 115.9 11590 $1,103.62 568-071-02 207-09 Third Ave. 50.6 115.9 5864.54 $558.43 568-071-03 215 Third Ave, 50 115.9 5795 $551.81 568-071-04 217 Third Ave. 25 115.9 2897.5 $275.91 568-071-05 221 Third Ave. 65.5 115.9 7591.45 $722.87 568-071~12 225 Third Ave. 46 115.9 5331.4 ' $507.67 568-071-13 227 Third Ave. 54 115.9 6258.6 $595.96 568-071-14 231 Thir~Ave. ,50 115.8 57>10 $551.34 568-071-15 239 Third Ave. 48 115.8 5558.4 $529.28 568-071-16 241-45Third Ave_ 66 115.9 .J649.4 $728.39 ' 568-071-17 247 ThirdAve. 56.2 115.8 6507.96 $619.70 568-152-21 250-56 Third Ave. 75 115 8625 $821.29 568-152-20 258-60 Third Ave. 50·' 115 . 5750 $547.53 568-'152-19 262 Third Ave. 49.8 115 . 5727 $545.34 568-152-18 266-68 Third Ave. 54 115 6210 $591.33 568-152-17. 270-76 Third Ave. 71.3 115 8199.5 $780.77 568-152-13 278-80 Third Ave. 40.4 115.3 4658.12 . $443.56 ----- -'-568-152-16' - 282-84 Third Ave. 5650.9 $538.99 -- ~-.. ---. 568-152c11' 28ôThlrd Ave. ' 25 115.3 2882.5 $274.48 568-152-10 288 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $274.48 568-152-09 290 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $549.43 568-152-08 294-96 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $549.43 568-152-07 298 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $274.72 568-152-06 300 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $274.72 568-161-26 253-57 Third Ave. 60 107.8 6468 $615.90 568-161-03 259 Third Ave. 29.8 107.8 3212.44 $305.89 568-161-04 261 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-161-05 265 Third Ave. 20 107.8 2156 $205.30 568-161-06 267 Third Ave. 30 107.8 3234 $307.95 568-161-07 269 Third Ave. 25.6 107.8 2759.68 $262.78 568-161-37 271 Third Ave. 24.4 107.8 2630.32 $250.46 568-161-36 273 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-161-09 275 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-161-10 279 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-161-11 281-83 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-161-12 285 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-161-13 289 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-161-27 291 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-161-28 295 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 3¡¿ 568-161-27 291 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-161-28 295 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-35 299 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-270-21 310 Third Ave. 57325 $13,358,56 568-270-22 320 Third Ave. 210 152.3 31983 $7,453.06 568-270-23 340 Third Ave. 98 152.3 14925.4 $3,478.10 568-30046 378-98 Third Ave. 260.4 115.9 30180.36 $7,032.99 568-333-01 301-05 Third Ave. 82.5 107.8 8893.5 $2,072.47 568-333-02 307 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-03 309 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-04 311-13 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 - $1.256.04 568-333-05 315 Thiid Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-06 317 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-07 319 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-08 321-23 Third Ave. 32.7 107.8 3525.06 $821.45 568-334-01 325-33 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 - $2,512.08 568-334-02 '335 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-334-03 337 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-334-04 341-47 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $2,512.08 - 568-351-01 - ·351 Third Ave. 50' 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 . 568-351-02 353 Third Ave. 28.5 107.8 .. -. 3072.3 $715.94 568-351-03 355 Third Ave. 4950 $1,153.51 . .568-350-39 357-59 Third Ave. 4054 $944.71 n 568-350-40 - 365-69 Third Ave. 4805 $1,119.72 568-350-23 37lTflirdAve. 1745 . - $406.64 - 568-350=25 373 Third Ave. -- 55 100 5500 $1,281.68 568-350-21 385-87 Third Ave. 50 109 5450 $1;270.02 - 568-350-20 389-91 Third Ave. 25 100 2500 $582.58 568-350-19 397 Third Ave. 100 100 10000 $2,330.32 ---- - TOTALS .. - 512612.1$119~455.00 - -- - - '- -- -------- --- ----- -- ._________ _ __ _~_ __ __ _u _m U "__ __0- _.__00_ ------..- -- -------- - __'_n___.___ _.. .___"_ - -~-- ,-- 0__",_ . ----'- _.~.'.'_. -'- ---.. -- _.._-_._--~---_._-_.__._---- --""---'-'--"---- ._-- h :\homelbethc\townctr3b. wb3 35 - TABLE 4 TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT BUDGET FOR ENHANCED SERVICES OPTION Parcel Number Site Address Frontage Depth Area Assessed Amount 568-044-23 300 E Street 90.5 115 10407.5 $2,523.30 568-044-22 208-12 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-044-21 214-18 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-044-20 222 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-044-19 224 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-044-18 226 Third Ave. 61.4 115.1 7067.14 $1,713.43 568-044-17 230 Third Ave. 23 115.2 2649.6 $642.40 568-044-16 232 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,396.51 568-044-15 234 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,396.51 568-044-14 236 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,396.51 568-044-13 242-44 Third Ave. 45 115.2 5184 $1,256.86 568-044-12 248 Third Ave. 40 115 4600 $1,115.27 568-071-01 201 Third Ave. 100 115.9 11590 $2,810.00 568-071-02 207-09 Third Ave. 50.6 115.9 5864.54 $1,421.86 568-071-03 215 Third Ave,- 50 115.9 5795 $1,405.00 . 568-071-04 217 Third Ave. 25 115.9 2897.5 $702.50 568-071-05 221 Third Ave. 65.5 115.9 7591.45 $1,840.55 568-071-12 225 Third Ave. 46 115:9 5331.4 $1,292:60 568-071-13 227 Third Ave. 54 115.9 6258.6 $1,517.40 -568-071-14 231 Third Ave. 50 115.8 . 5790 $1,403:79 . 568-071-15 239 Third Ave. 48 115.8 5558.4 $1,347.63 568-071-16 __ 241-45 Third Ave. 66 115.9 7649.4 $1.854.60 568-071017 247 Third Ave. 56.2 115.8 6507.96 $1,577.85 568-152-21 250-56 Third Ave. 75 115 8625 $2,091.13 568-152-20 258-60 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-152-19 262 Third Ave. 49.8 115 5727 $1,388.51 568-152-18 266-68 Third Ave.- 54 115 6210- $1,505.61 568-152-17· 270-76 Third Ave. 71.3 - 115 8199.5 --.: _$1.987.97- '568--152~13 . "278-80 Third Ave: 40.4 115.3 4658.12 $1,129.36· 568-152-16 282-84 Third Ave. 5650.9 $1,370.06 568-152-11 286 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $698.86 568-152-10 288 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $698.86 568-152-09 290 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $1,398.94 568-152-08 294-96 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $1,398.94 568-152-07 298 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $699.47 568-152-06 300 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $699.47 568-161-26 253-57 Third Ave. 60 107.8 6468 $1,568.17 568-161-03 259 Third Ave. 29.8 107.8 3212.44 $778.86 568-161-04 261 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-05 265 Third Ave. 20 107.8 2156 $522.72 568-161-06 267 Third Ave. 30 107.8 3234 $784.08 568-161-07 269 Third Ave. 25.6 107.8 2759.68 $669.08 568-161-37 271 Third Ave. 24.4 107.8 2630.32 $637.72 568-161-36 273 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-161-09 275 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-161-10 279 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-11 281-83 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-12 285 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-13 289 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-161-27 291 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-161-28 295 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-35 299 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 }b 568-161-35 299 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-270-21 310 Third Ave. 57325 $5.458.60 568-270-22 320 Third Ave. 210 152.3 31983 $3,045.49 568-270-23 340 Third Ave. 98 152.3 14925.4 $1,421.23 568-300-46 378-98 Third Ave. 260.4 115.9 30180.36 $2,873.83 568-333-01 301-05 Third Ave. 82.5 107.8 8893.5 $846.86 568-333-02 307 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-03 309 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-04 311-13 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-333-05 315 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-06 317 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-07 319 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-08 321-23 Third Ave. 32.7 107.8 3525.06 $335:66 568-334-01 325-33 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $1,026.49 568-334-02 335 Third Ave. . 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-334-03 . 337 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568_334-04 _341-47 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $1,026.49 568-351-01 351 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-351-02 353 Third Ave. 28.5 107.8 3072.3 $292.55 568-351-03 355 Third Ave. '.. 4950 $471.35 . - 568-350'39 357~59Thjrd Ave. 4054 . . $386.03 568-350-40 365-69 Third' Ave. 4805 $457.54 568·350-23 371 Third Ave. 1745 $166.16 568-350-25 373 Third Ave. 55 100 5500 $523.72 568-350-21 385-87 Third Ave. 50 109 5450 . $518.96 568-350-20 389-91 Third Ave. . -25 100 2500 $238.06 568-350-19 397 Third Ave. 100 100 10000 u. $95222 TOTALS 512612.1 $48,812.00 ..--- -- _..- ---.-------. -.-.-- ------ - ,-- - -_ ____ "u___ ._____ ___ . _ ___ - _.n ,-,_.----- --. ~.--- -- --_...-...~~.._- -- --~ '-~ -----.-- ---- . __u_ ____ '_ .""'--~ .'.-.' .. . ---. - ---~ ---- -. - h:\homelbethcltownctra.wb3 /7/ ,,- /. ~_.._._- TABLE 5 TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT BilLING FOR "AS IS" OPTION CONSIDERING RESERVES Parcel Number Site Address Frontage Depth Area Assessed Amount 568-044-23 300 E Street 90.5 115 10407.5 $243.88 568-044-22 208-12 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-044-21 214-18 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-044-20 222 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-044-19 224 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-044-18 226 Third Ave. 61.4 115.1 7067.14 $165.60 568-044-17 230 Third Ave. 23 115.2 2649.6 $62.09 568-044-16 232 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $134.97 568-044-15 234 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $134.97 568-044-14 236 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $134.97 568-044-13 242-44 Third Ave. 45 115.2 5184 $121.48 568-044-12 248 Third Ave. 40 115 4600 . $107.79 568-071-01 201 Third Ave. 100 115.9 11590 $271.59 568-071-02 207-09 Third Ave. 50.6 115.9 5864.54 $137.42 568-071-03 215 Third Ave, 50 115.9 5795 $135.79 56SC071-04 217Third Ave. 25 115.9 2897.5 '$67.90 568-071-05 221 Third Ave. 65.5 115.9 7591.45 $177.89 568-071-12 225 Third Ave. 46 115.9 5331.4 $124.93 568-071-13 n 227 'fhird Ave. 54 115.9 6258.6 $146.66 568-071-14 231 Third Ave. 50 115.8 5790 $135.68 568-071-15 239 Third Ave. 48 115.8 - 5558.4 $130.25 568-071-16 241-45 Third Ave. 66 115.9 7649.4 $179.25 568-071-17 247 Third Ave. 56.2 115.8 6507.96 $152.50 · 568-152-21 250-56 Third Ave. 75 115 8625 $202.11 568-152-20· 25~0 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-152-19 262 Third Ave. 49.8 115 5727 $134.20 568-152-18 261Hì8Third Ave. 54 115 6210 .$145.52 ." 568-152-17 - - 270-76 Third Ave: 71.3- . -115 8199.5 - -$192.14 -. õ6B:-152:Ü - ~-27~OThird-Áve. "-- 40.4' 115.3' 4658.12 -$109.15 568-152-16 282-84 Third Ave. 5650.9 - $132.42 568-152-11 286 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $67.55 568-152-10 288 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $67.55 568-152-09 290 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $135.21 568-152-08 294-96 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $135.21 · 568-152-07 298 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $67.60 568-152-06 300 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $67.60 568-161-26· 253-57 Third Ave. 60 107.8 6468 $151.56 568-161-03 259 Third Ave. 29.8 107.8 3212.44 $75.28 568-161-04 261 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-161-05 265 Third Ave. 20 107.8 2156 $50.52 568-161-06 267 Third Ave. 30 107.8 3234 $75.78 568-161-07 269 Third Ave. 25.6 107.8 2759.68 $64.67 568-161-37. 271 Third Ave. 24.4 107.8 2630.32 $61.64 568-161-36 273 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-161-09 275 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-161-10 279 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 · 568-161-11 281-83 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-161-12 285 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-161-13 289 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 3Z 568-161-27 291 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-161-28 295 Third Ave 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-161-35 299 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-270-21 310 Third Ave. 57325 $1,343.30 568-270-22 320 Third Ave. 210 152.3 31983 $749.46 568-270-23 340 Third Ave. 98 152.3 14925.4 $349.75 568-300-46 378-98 Third Ave. 260.4 115.9 30180.36 $707.22 568-333-01 301-05 Third Ave. 82.5 107.8 8893.5 $208.40 568-333-02 307 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-03 309 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-04 311-13 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-333-05 315Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-06 317 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-07 319 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-08 321-23 Third Ave. 32.7 107.8 3525.06 $82.60 568-334-01 325-33 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $252.61 568-33+02 335 Third Ave. 25 ·107.8 2695 $63.15 568-334-03 337 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-334-04 341-47 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $252.61 .568-351-01 n 351 Third Ave. 50 107.8 . 5390u $126.30 568-351-02 353"1"hird Ave. 28.5 107.8 _C 3072.3 $71.99 568-351-03 355 Third Ave. 4950 $115.99 568-350-39 35}-59 Third Ave. 4054 $95.00 568-350-40 -36tXì9 Third Ave. 4805 $112.60 568-350-23 -371-Tilird Ave. 1745 $40.89 568-350-25 . 373 ThirdAve. 55 100 .. 5500 $128:88 568-350-21 385-87 Third Ave. 50 109 5450 $127.71 .-- . 56B-350-2Ú -- 389-91 Third Ave. 25 100 2500 $58.58 568-350-19 397 Third Ave. 100 100 10000 $234.33 TOTALS 512612.1 n .. _$12,012.00 . -.. --- - -----. --- --. -~-_.__.._. ---..---. _._____u_ _~_. ____ __ _____ _____ __..__ ____ n__" --~.-~---- -._.~_._.~"_-'.'~'_- - -.. -., - ---- ,'-- ~-_._--, -,--- ---'.-_"_'"~' -- --~--~-- ..-- ---- .- h:\homelbethcltownctr1b.wb3 -- ,. -;2 t1 /; TABLE 6 TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT BilLING FOR ENHANCED SERVICES CONSIDERING RESERVES Parcel Number Site Address F rentage Depth Area Assessed Amount 568-044-23 300 E Street 90.5 115 10407.5 $2,425.28 568-044-22 208-12 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339.93 568-044-21 214-18 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339.93 568-044-20 222 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339,93 568-044-19 224 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339.93 568-044-18 226 Third Ave. 61.4 115.1 7067.14 $1,646.87 568-044-17 230 Third Ave. 23 115.2 2649.6 $617.44 568-044-16 232 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1 ,342.26 568-044-15 234 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,342.26 568-044-14 236 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,342.26 568-044-13 242-44 Third Ave. 45 115.2 5184 $1,208.04 568-044-12 248 Third Ave. 40 115 4600 $1,071.95 568-071-01 201 Third Ave. 100 115.9 11590 $2,700.84 568-071-02 207-09 Third Ave. 50.6 115.9 5864.54 $1,366.63 568-071-03 215 Third Ave, 50 115.9 . 5795 . $1,350.42 c. 568-011-04c 217 Third Ave. 25 115.9 2897.5 $675.21 568-071-05 221 Third Ave. 65.5 115.9 7591.45 $1,769.05 568-071-12 225 Third Ave. 46 115.9 5331.4 $1,242.39 568-071-13 227 Third Ave. 54 115.9 6258.6 $1,458.45 - 568.,071-14 231 Third Ave. 50 115.8 5790 $1 ;349.26 · :568-071C15 . - 239 Third Ave. - . 48 115.8 - 5558,4- '$1;295.29 .568-071-16 241-45 Third Ave. 66 115.9 7649.4 . $1,782.55 _ 568-071-17 247 Third Ave. 55.2 115.8 6507;96 $1,516:56 568- 152c21 250-:56 Third Ave. 75 115 8625 $2,009.90 568-152-20 25~0 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339.93 568-152-19 262 Third Ave. 49.8 115 5727 $1,334.57 568-152-18 266-68 Third Ave. 54 115 6210 $1,447.13_ _':':·..c56ß;.152ot7- -.- .:.27.Q..76l"11ird Aw,--'- 71.3 115-8199.5 - -. n_ $t910.75 -- 115.3' -4658:-12 _~ ____I. "..~..__ __ ..__ -56!F152-13 278-'8t)-Third Ave: ----40.4 $1,085.49 568-152c16 282-84 Third Ave. 5650.9 $1,316.84 568-152-11 286 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $671.71 568-152-10 288 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $671.71 · 568-152-09 290 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $1,344.59 568-152-08 294-96 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $1,344.59 568-152-07 298 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $672.30 568-152-06 300 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $672.30 568-161-26 253-57 Third Ave. 60 107.8 6468 $1,507.25 568-161-03 259 Third Ave. 29.8 107.8 3212.44 $748.60 568-161-04 261 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-05 265 Third Ave. 20 107.8 2156 $502.42 568-161-06 267 Third Ave. 30 107.8 3234 $753.63 568-161-07 269 Third Ave. 25.6 107.8 2759.68 $643.09 568-161-37 271 Third Ave. 24.4 107.8 2630.32 $612.95 568-161-36 273 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 · 568-161-09 275 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-161-10 279 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-11 281-'83 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-12 285 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-13 289 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 'I ~ ; I / I ~J 568-270-21 310 Third Ave. 57325 $13,898.45 568-270-22 320 Third Ave. 210 152.3 31983 $7,754.28 568-270-23 340 Third Ave. 98 152.3 14925.4 $3,618.66 568-300-46 378-98 Third Ave. 260.4 115.9 30180.36 $7,317.23 568-333-01 301-05 Third Ave. 82.5 107.8 8893.5 $2,156.23 568-333-02 307 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-333-03 309 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-333-04 311·13 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-333-05 315 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-333-06 317 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-333-07 319 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 . $653.40 568-333-08 321-23 Third Ave. 32.7 107.8 3525.06 $854.65 568-334-01 325-33 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $2,613.61 568-334-02 335 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-334-03 337 Third Ave. 25 107.8 ·2695 $653.40 568-334-04 341-47 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $2,613.61 568-351~01 . 351 Third Ave. 50 107,8 5390 $1,306.81 568-351-02 353 Third Ave. 28.5 107.8 3072.3 $744.88 568-351-03 355 Third Ave. 4950 $1,200.13 568-350-'39 357;59 Third Ave. 4054 $982.89 568-350-40 365-69 Third Äve: 4805 $1,164.97 568-350-23 371 Third Ave. 1745 $423.08 568-350-25 373 Third Ave. 55 100 5500 $1,333.48 568-350-21 385-87 Third Ave. 50 109 5450 $1,321.35 ·56~350-20 . 389-91 Third AVe.. 25 '100 2500 $606.13 - - 568-350-19 397 Third Ave. 100 . 100 10000 $2,424.50 TOTALS 512612.1 $124,283.00 -- -- h:\hornelbethc\townctr2a:Wb3 ~ .~.~ ~--",. ----..- ._-~--~-.~"". ~~~~~_._~--~~-~ - .~ - ~---~_._. .~- ----- --. --- -------...-- . - , / . 1'/ -- ...~...__.,,~_.- ---- - This page blanK --------- - -.----..-- --- ------- n._ ___..___ ------------- - ---- -_.- --- -- ~--~- -- ~-~',. -- -~-~... --...,~~"~_._, ~ -~ .___,~___ 0-' ~'.~_~_~.~__..~ ....."_"__~ m.._.. -------- - - ~ -",.-, ---- · -,------ --.... m..____ --- · ::1" · / .-+ .I 1,.-' ENGINEER'S REPORT BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT July 6, 1999 __ __^_,_.____....__.__._..,._..___.~_____.__.._~_.___.._n_______n_._'· ---___ BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING AL'ID LIGIITING DISTRICT Introduction The Bay Boulevard Landscaping and Lighting District was originally established in 1982 by resolution of the Chula Vista City Council, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in order to pay for maintenance of improvements installed that year on Bay Boulevard. These improvements consist of the following: L Maintenance of the parkway on the west side of Bay Boulevard between from just south of the Nature Interpretive Center entrance at "E~ Street to Lagoon Drivel "F" Street_ This parkway is composed of Acacia shrubs and Canary Island pine trees. Street lighting is also included. 2. Maintenance of the park located at the northwest comer of Bay Boulevard and Lagoon Drivel "F~ Street. This park includes two separated lawn areas with picnic tables and tree, shrub and ground plantings. There is also a small planted area on the northeast comer of "F" Street and Bay Blvd. Area lighting is also included. The District is located in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California as depicted on the boundary map included as Exhibit A herein. A map of this District was recorded in the office of tfte City Engineer on June 13, 1989. No changes are being proposed to the District boundaries. The parcels being assessed for this District are as follows: APN 567-021-29 APN 567-021-38 APN 567-021-37 APN 567-021-36 . Proposition 218, which took effect on July 1. 1997, requires that all existing, new or increased assessments comply with the act unless they fall under several exempted categories. Districts established for landscaping and lighting maintenance are not considered automatically exempt. Since this District was not originally established pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all the parcels subject to the assessment or through voter approval, levy of assessments within the District is subject to Proposition 218 requirements, including preparation of a new Engineer's Report and conducting an assessment ballot procedure among all property owners. Cost EStimate The cost estimate for maintenance of this District is shown on Table 1. The Total Budget Amount I -~ -~._-~----- ---~.~---_._----------_._.__.~-_._-, ,----------.-------- for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is estimated to be $15,491. This estimate is based on the City's experience of the annual maintenance work required. This maintenance work shall include, bur not be limited to, the furnishing of services and marerials needed to maintain the landscaping and lighting, including irrigation, nimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating the landscaping for disease and injury; the removal of solid waste; the furnishing of warer for irrigation and electricity for lighting and the irrigation sysrem; and repairing the lighting and irrigation system. With the exception of trash collection and disposal, which is done by Laidlaw, all other labor will be performed by City staff. Rate and Method of Apportionment An assessment has been calculated annually for the properties included within the District and billed to the property owners on the County ta."<: bill. The method of apportionment of the District's costs to the properties has been reviewed and it was decided that use of parcel area would be a reasonable and justifiable method to spread the cost over the parcels to reflect the special benefit received by such parcels from the improvements being maintained. All parcels are - classified for commercial land use. Table 2 shows how the total aIJIlual cost for this District would be distributed among the four parcels. The Rate of Assessment for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is $2424.26 per acre. This rate shall be increased every fiscal year thereafter by the lesser of the annual percentage increase, if any, in the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (all irems) or the annual percentage increase, if any, in the California Fourth Quarrer Per Capita Personal Income as contained in the Governor's budget published every January. These factors are currently being used for the City's other Landscaping and Lighting Districts. The Rate of Assessment recalculated for each Fiscal Year will be the maximum rare billable to the property owners. The end of year Operating Fund Balance and the Reserve Fund Requirement will need to be taken into account when derermining the actual billing amounts for the fiscal year. The Reserve Fund is a fund or account that shall be m~inf:lin"li for the District in order to provide necessary cash flow for operation and maintenance during the first six months of the fiscal year, working capital to cover m~inr"'nance and repair cost overruns or unanticipated m~inrenance expenses and funding shortfalls resulting from delinquencies that may arise in connection with the collection of the assessments. The Reserve Fund Requirement shall be a minimum of 50 percent and a maximum of 100 percent of the Total Budget Amount for the upcoming fiscal year. Should there be insufficient funds available to cover a 50 percent Reserve Fund Requirement, the reserve percent shall be as high as allowable at the Rate of Assessment for the upcoming fiscal year. The amount billable to parcels within the District for each fiscal year will therefore be calculated as follows: ') --..-.,.....--..-.----.---------... ..- _.,------ -. ~._--_.._--,----- (Total Budget Amount) + (Reserve Fund Requirement) - (Operating Fund Balance) = (Total Billable Amount) AND (Total Billable Amount) = Billing Rate; which shall be less than or equal to the (Total number of Acres) Rate of Assessment The billable amounts for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 are shown in Table 3 for all parcels in the District. Based on a 100 percent reserve, the total revenue needed is $5.210. The Billing Rate is 5815.336 per Acre. This billing rate is permissible, since it is less than the Rate of Assessment. h: \home\engineer\asmtdist\osds\bbengr .emc 3 _ ,_____" ___ ________"._.n .\ ~ EXHIBIT A i , . I! ' . . I I I 1 I · . , , .¡ ~ j , i ¡ i I' ., . , , ¡ , , I: I il , I I II I , I : ! - II I, - ¡ í I - I I I' , i - ~-I , ·1 I - I , I i ,. .' I , ! ill , II ¡ i ! I I I ¡: i I I I '0'1 , I I , - I f ~ " - II "I I ( i r lJ/5ïRICï ~ ' , <::;- i , i ¡ ~, . I EOUNOAZ r I , 'I 11/ I , I i i I 'I ' " -., ~;lí/¡,·/~¡./Y'E \ ! I ¡ I · II ! : \ I TI £=57':;.V~'ï \ , I ' I .. ; :1 ' .. ;¡ I I' \ i )...!I ' I II # - l ~ (5';7.CZI-Z'7) \ II I ~Ii I I Ii - - I - ~Il I ! 11 I' g ì ~ --~1 ; : ¡ , ' I11I ". ' · i.....I LJ) \¡ ¡ ¡~ DA Y S IN¡o.' \\ WJ II ( ; I MCïc;R III! !; I I LCDG= , ,I i; · I - " \ I ~ii ¡ I I , \.1..1 I; .~ , C .5~7·¿;Z /·33) , I I ; : , - · i d I I /"=ZOO' ;)... I t..j , I. ,! h: -- - I £L ïCiÆ'1 T~ - I I CCl R¿5 TAL/p'..k.NT . I - JI ,. , ' ~!I · , " 1 ¡. ,(-.- /':7 --) , 'I I I · I \ :;c ~ -",_I ..: / ~j I i , , · Ii i I ' . 'Z: I I I ¡..,.II I ¡ I -- , i · Ii I - ! , SO,/,.::: =XC;.iANc;~ \Jj i I i I I i: i ¡ ~II !: III l<.l!1 I · . " - 1 II f-....' - ~! - - ! , Ii 'I ~ i , CITy' Ii ~ · PAZK ~ I I Ii · I I I! I I · · II - ! UF" I I II 5 /. U ", ( = II I Ii I I II a " : ! ~ - ,. i - , - \. ¡ ¡: , - - I 1: I - - I' , - ¡ , , , , - , - ~ · :: ~ .:...,.. 9 ~ -:- I ... '- ~ I I' ....' r' ...-: /" / -=: I ¡ - ------ I ---------- '::;,- I -.' /' - - .' ' > ,- I 1-' >-: /".;' - , 1-/- ,. _/ ..- I 1<- _ _ .. !..-:' ,_~:""'7 ; ~,...-' , a . - - . - , _. - ~·-;;=·P/ L/. ,_IC::-CAFE // A' ,- - '¡L.. V - D':: -/,l/'"; I . ___ _-r'_-....:""_-.:....._.,:..._ /iiA I t;;..I. '.:. E ,~/... 1,-, I · , - -- -".-..- ----_.._--~- _0·- TABLE 1 ~L~lEN.~~CESERVICES BAY BL "1). LA1~1)SCAPING A1~1) LIGHTING DISTRICT Electricity for lighting and irrigation sysrem 5961 Trash collection and disposal 5475 Irrigation water 52.834 Town Gardener salary and benefits 57,060 City adrninistrative costs 52.781 Cerrification ofbackflow prevenrer devices 5120 Landscaping supplies 5850 Maintenance materials: low volume irrigation emitters 5230 Public noticing 5180 TOTAL: 515,491 h:\bome\engineer'asmtdist\hbtab I.eme - -------..--- ,..-..'-'-..---'---. ------.- _.._---~-------- TABLE 2 BAY BLVD. LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT - BUDGET FOR CURRENT SERVICE Parcel Number Site Address Acreage Assessed Amount 567-021-29 215 Bay Blvd. 1.24 $3,006.08 567-021-36 225 Bay Blvd. 2.12 $5,139.43 567-021-37 271 Bay Blvd. 1.74 $4,218.21 567-021-38 285 Bay Blvd. 1.29 $3,127.30 6.39 $15,491.00 h :\homelbethclbaybl. wb3 -----,_._,--"._--- -----,_._-_.__...._---_._....,---~_.._.__.__.-._._,._.~--. -~-~._~-----_._._._._. TABLE 3 BAY BLVD. LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT BILLING FOR CURRENT SERVICES CONSIDERING RESERVES Parcel Number Site Address Acreage Assessed Amount 567-021-29 215 Bay Blvd. 1.24 $1,011.02 567-021-36 225 Bay Blvd. 2.12 $1,728.51 567-021-37 271 Bay Blvd. 1.74 $1,418.68 567-021-38 285 Bay Blvd. 1.29 $1,051.78 6.39 $5,210.00 h:\homelbethclbaybI1.wb3 - -"-, -----_.._------~----_..._._" __ .__.._._._______.m._.'·__ ENGINEER'S REPORT TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT July 6, 1999 --"_.._---_.-,--_.__."-----,.- ....----- ......---.----..--- TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT Introduction On November 13, 1979 the Chula Vista City Council accepted the landscaping improvements installed on Third Avenue between "E" and "P" Streets. A public hearing was subsequently held and the formation of an Assessment District in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 was authorized by Council on June 17 ,1980. Additional improvements were subsequently constructed on Third Avenue between "P" and "G" Streets and along "P" Street between Third and Garrett Avenues. These improvements included the following: 1. Improvements on Third Avenue between "E" and "G" Streets: Various improvements located between the curb and building fronts, including enhanced stamped concrete sidewalks and waJkways, raised planters, container planters, shade structures with vines, supplemental tree plantings, landscaped covered bus stops, park benches, decorative street lamps, ornamental accent lighting in shade structures, decorative litter containers, ashtrays and an outdoor decorative clock. 2. Improvements on "P" Street between Garrett and Third Avenues (south side of street): Supplemental tree plantings, enhanced concrete sidewalks, decorative street lamps A revised map of this district was prepared in 1985 which identifies parcels within the current boundaries. It includes the parcels along Third Avenue between "E" and "G" Street, with the exception of the City Park, and three parcels along "P" Street which do not have frontage on Third Avenue: Assessor's Parcel Numbers 568-270-20, 568-270-27 and 568-270-30. Proposition 218, which took effect on July 1, 1997, requires that all existing, new or increased assessments comply with the act unless they fall under several exempted categories. Districts established for landscaping and lighting maintenance are not considered automatically exempt. Since this District was not originally established pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all the parcels subject to the assessment or through voter approval, levy of assessments within the District is subject to Proposition 218 requirements, including preparation of a new Engineer's Report and conducting an assessment ballot procedure among all property owners. District Boundaries During the process of reforming the District, a number of issues were considered. The first issue pertained to the establishment of zones within the District. The level of improvements adjacent to the three properties which front "P" Street is significantly lower than for the properties fronting Third Avenue. There seemed to be two options: establish a separate zone for the three "P" Street I - --,-,_.,_......,',._.--_.~..--.-...._---.-----_._..._.,_.-._..- ---- _.._..~-_. parcels or eliminate these parcels from the District. It is recommended that these three parcels be eliminated from the District due to the difficulty and expense involved in dividing the costs and keeping separate records for a zone with three parcels and the fact that the parcels on the north side of "F" Street, which have similar improvements, have not been included in the District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 1999-2000, funds obtained from the assessments for this District will no longer be used to maintain the City improvements in front of these properties. The revised District boundaries are shown on Exhibit A, along with current parcel numbers. Cost Estimates Based on input from property and business owners, two level of service options for maintenance of the improvements were identified for the Town Centre District. It is recommended that both options be presented to the property owners for consideration in the ballot process. The first option is considered the "As Is" Option since it involves the same improvements and the same level of maintenance currently performed. The Total Budget Amount for this option for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is estimated to be $48,812, as shown on Table 1. This estimate is based on the City's experience of the annual maintenance work required. The maintenance work shall include, but not be limited to, the furnishing of services and materials necessary to maintain the plantings and other amenities, including irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating the plantings for disease and injury; the furnishing of water for irrigation and electricity for lighting, the irrigation system and the clock; steam cleaning the sidewalks; painting the benches and other improvements; replacing trash can liners and receptacles; and repairing the lighting and irrigation system. With the exception of sidewalk steam cleaning, all other work has been done by City staff. The "Enhanced Service" Option includes both the "as is" services and the additional enhancements shown on Table 2. These enhancements include seasonal plantings, additional labor for cleanup and litter control, additional painting of street lights and planters, additional signage, a contraCt with an electrician for maintenance of accent lighting, streetlamp lens replacement, replacement of concrete litter containers and repair of the trellises. The cost of these enhancements is $75,471. Therefore, the total cost of the Enhanced Service Option is $48,812 + $75,471 = $124,283. Rate and Method of Apportionment An assessment has been calculated annually for the properties included within the District and billed to the property owners on the County tax bill. The method of apportionment of the District's costs to the properties has been reviewed and it was decided that use of parcel area 2 -- --- would be a reasonable and justifiable method to spread the cost over the parcels to reflect the special benefit received by such parcels from the improvements being maintained. All parcels are classified for commercial land use. Separate tables have been prepared to show how the total annual costs associated with each option would be distributed and assessed to all the parcels in the District. Table 3 shows the breakdown per parcel for the As Is Option, while Table 4 shows the breakdown per parcel for the Enhanced Services Option. The Rate of Assessment for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is as follows: As Is Option: $0.095222 per square foot (SF) of parcel area Enhanced Services Option: $0.24245 per square foot (SF) of parcel area The rate for the option selected by ballot shall be increased every fiscal year thereafter by the lesser of the annual percentage increase, if any, in the January to January San Diego Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (all items) or the annual percentage increase, if any, in the California Fourth Quarter Per Capita Personal Income as contained in the Governor's budget published every January. These factors are currently being used for the City's other Landscaping and Lighting Districts. Although the Enhanced Services Option shows a reduction in cost of $4,160 after the first year it is not recommended that the total assessment be reduced by this amount because this amount is only 3.3 percent of the total assessment and it is likely that other minor improvements will be requested or required in future years. The Rate of Assessment recalculated for each Fiscal Year will be the maximum rate billable to the property owners. The end of year Operating Fund Balance and the Reserve Fund Requirement will need to be taken into account when determining the actual billing amounts for the fiscal year. The Reserve Fund is a fund or account that shall be maintained for the District in order to provide necessary cash flow for operation and maintenance during the first six months of the fiscal year, working capital to cover maintenance and repair cost overruns or unanticipated maintenance expenses and funding shortfalls resulting from delinquencies that may arise in connection with the collection of the assessments. The Reserve Fund Requirement shall be a minimum of 50 percent and a maximum of 100 percent of the Total Budget Amount for the upcoming fiscal year. Should there be insufficient funds available to cover a 50 percent Reserve Fund Requirement, the reserve percent shall be as high as allowable at the Rate of Assessment for the upcoming fiscal year. The amount billable to parcels within the District for each fiscal year will therefore be calculated as follows: (Total Budget Amount) + (Reserve Fund Requirement) - (Operating Fund Balance) = (Total Billable Amount) AND 3 - ~..__..._-~--~_._-~.__._-" - .- _.~.._._-~. (Total BilJable Amount) = Billing Rate; which shall be less than or equal to the (Total number of Acres) Rate of Assessment The billable amounts by parcel for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 are shown in Table 5 for the As Is Option and Table 6 for the Enhanced Services Option. The results are Sllmmarized below: Option Total Revenue Needed Reserve Percent Billin~ Rate As Is $12,012 100 $0.023433/ SF Enhanced Services $119,455 65 $0.233032/ SF Since the Billing Rate for each option is less than the Rate of Assessment for the same option, the Billing Rates are permissible. h: \home\engineer\asmtdist\osds\tcengr.emc 4 _ _~_._____ _____..___.".._____u____..____..__,___.' ___ ___,.______~_"_."_ / 5 heet 1 of 2 / ~R~~\ EXHIl3/T -A ~' S\ " _4~ - 5óß-C ¡ , ~. - ~~ . \ -- -- ~ -.-/ . ___ '<ß~ \. 5&fr'J1\.o2, -- - / ~.....'l' /- / -- N -------- // /___ ./--::\ ,"ß'T'"---;;: /_ / ,--:::.::a~. -- / - .. 2\. ..~.. / / ___ '. ~-. nAA- .... , n<'·....____- \ ~ ~', \ "'I',,-u';J \ ___' , .. '-~ß-O'. .- .~20. '~.. -- -- \ \,' .- .-.--- .'.~'. ' '2'. ----- W E --/ . .. ·,,,-,,1\-' , . ,,\9' "~' ---- ' , . \ ---- --- /-- \~' ,J\-\~----- - __ ~_\ß ~, --- ' --- --' -- '. \ \, ---- ...--- . --- -- _ ---.~, ....--\ \~,. ____--- s ...---- -/./ -.-/- ,~ . '''~\6' j:.' 1\-\5.. '-:---- ___ _ ~ ~&fr'J, _/ - - . \ - -- ~ - - " ..".,.,.. \ , .--- .- --- /'.ft nAA-\5 . ..-(\, J\_\6 \ _..-/- - /-/ ./ '~' ~ ,<þß-O .. / -- ~-- -- \ \ '; .... ' -- / ~\A ,....... ,""- ------ . ...________- .' ___ --- ., ~ ,------. \1· .. ___ _. .. .pr' ._____' , ~1\- . ____ .___-'- -/ _____ '\---::: nAA-\2\, \~ ____------/ .----' ___./---- / . ~ ------ -f'O 1Ç:t.- ---' - - /- ···;--L\~' ~ S ~ \ \ ..~SO \ Ø\~\ /"/" ~ ____ \)f'~' \____-:-:..\..o~....____ - - ------ ~ ,\' ,~.\ -.. ---------- ..---: '. \:;¡-- .. \6\..oA . ___,. --- --- . - ___------ ~ .. ø . ..~; --- / /. ~. "\?.. n~' .___ ----- ... , ..' -\ ---.--- --- - . "', .s:fã \ .....- -- ____ ...____- \5'2:7.0 .. L ~~, / / - ø . \;::::---:<,.r:iJ-' ____ DISTR. ICT BOUNDARY ..~.. 9 \ ~z \~;¡\. .______- --- ___ _ c.')-'\' ~6'\' - --- / .. ~_ \--, 'ii'1'ò- :!fi;'. _/ _______ /". . --- .. C. ~\ -- ---- -- -- ',\ ~\----- .--------- .----/ \ \:;¡-\II,.-f'\ .... ~\~, .-/ ____ . ø'- ______ \ \ . ~. \0 / ___--- ---'-- ---/ ____ ~'1 .. \ _<...\61- . ----- - ---. \:;¡-\ '. - ------- ___----- /-- /------ '; ø':.-------, ~\6\-\\ -------- / .---- / \.---....--.~2-\~ .., \ ~ - \"'"'. ____________ - /---- \~.... \6\_\2· ---- / _ /-, \s'Z.-\6 .. .., ø·---....-:;; ______ - // /------ .... ø':---;:::, \.._~~\ / /---- ----- .~\~~\s2;. ~~ '6\-21 ' .----.- ',~ ...,0' \ \ . /- /-'.~\~' ~. $>' .... ---- . ------- ,~ --.r:ß \ \ ø\6\ \ ---- --- . .---- _",,-"\52. ~. _.-/ ___ ______ ~ \ \ ~t6, --- ..________-- ,~\ ø\6\ ,----- . ~ . _",,-"\SZ ,<;jP"'_______ / \':1""";¡. ~ _ .,~ '\ ----/-/" .~ ~Rt.S-/ .-/ ~" S - --------- " / .______ I ë"1L.::: N·:. JO-Q09 DWN='1':D.M.Wolfe TOWN CENTRE STREET LIGHTING & :;.7:::: 5/26/99 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT _.____.__._. ___.__.......__....__ . .____~__.,.... _.___ ~_.__._~_~__.M_._'._··_ ~ Sheet 2 Of 2 f" S\~~~~/' " ^~'.TQ~ 56&-':> -_/ -\ ~ -- ~ ~ . / -/ 'I ~.~ -/ :z.1()-'2.. 0 ..~ _~ - 5'õ'ò \~ . //_"\ / / . ~B / R~'é: ~- ---\5 ~R S~_/ ~ C~~"\ ~- 0 p..cS\.. /~- ::t. ?p' ~ - c:. O\!'l~SD .'. ~~' ..---_ ~ . ~\-0 56 ~ 0 () ') "Y . ~. //::t. /---------- :::; '2..10-'2:- ¿: \ ~'.ò --- . . - -- -.t.. 5'õ'è- , /__________ o ~.. /--- ~ _- \ ~:z. \~, íiÏ \_________ 1"1' C. ,z., o 1()-'2..3 \.----::: j. c:. ....._______ ~ 56'&-'2.. t\\ \ ~~J)~ .. _________. íiÏ .. ):J \~,-- ..---, .______ () . ~~-------- . 1"1' .~ ~ ~ \~~ .-J ' MADRONA STRE~ DISTRICT BOUNDARY ---- --------. _ p..CS\..5 ~-- _~?f:' . -~ ~~SQ -- .- C\-0 0, .. N ..->- ---. ---- /.-- \['J p...'< ___-- '? p...R\Z \ ..--- W / E --- 'i1> \ e1J ., ...---- ¡,. , ---- '3 ---- .------ ~ \ , S - .---.. \ ------ ~ \ t-t.\ ---- ---- . ~.. S\~ ~. / / ----------- C:;' ---.. --- " / - --- /~- I i'ïL:: NO. JO-OO9 - . --- ~ :)WN :":': D.M.Worfe TOWN CENTRE STREET LIGHTING & D:.7::: : 5 I 2 6 I "9 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT - - - ---^---- -'---'-," - -.,..---.-- - _'_._n_'_____".__ TABLE 1 "AS IS" SERVICES TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT Professional Services $3,700 Electricity for lighting, irrigation system, clock $5,429 Irrigation water $2,480 Town Gardener salary and benefits $17,975 City administrative costs $7,058 Sidewalk steam cleaning contract $8,100 Certification ofbackflow preventer devices $120 Other contract services $1,920 Landscaping supplies $600 Other commodities: trash can liners, replacement of trash receptacles $1,250 Public Noticing $180 TOTAL: $48,812 h:lhomelengineerlasmtdistlosdsltetab I.eme ~,---.-.-----------.----- .-"----------.-...--.... ....--.- .._-_._~ TABLE 2 ADDITIONAL ENHANCEMENTS FOR TOWN CENTRE DISTRICT 1. Planters and plantings a. Seasonal 4x1yr supplemental "color" plantings $/replant x frequency/yr = $/yr $3,360 x 4 = $13,440.oo/yr b. Paint planters........... .......... .....$8oo.oo/yr c. Relocation ofplanters..................$2,500.00 Ix ongoing cost/yr..... ......... .$500.oo/yr d. Replacement of large planters. .2/yr... .$6,ooo.oo/yr #/yr x $/unit = $/yr 2 x 3,000.00 - $6,ooo.oo/yr SUBTOTAL: $22,740 2. Painting projects a. Supplemental street lights (decorative) ................$2,500.oo/yr b. Cobra type street light ..................$1,315.oo/yr SUBTOTAL: $3,815 3. Signage a. Parking signs $40 x 3 = $120 + pole work $200 = $320.00 b: No skateboarding signs 40.00 ea x 8 # = $320.00 first year $160.oo/yr ongoing SUBTOTAL: $640 4. Lighting a. Electrician contract to maintain all accent lighting in trellises and bus stops, includes cost of bulbs and fixtures........... ..... ........ ............ ..$2,500.00/yr b. Decorative streetlamp lens replacement program. Schedule once every three years replacement. cost/unit x total # units divided by 3 years = $ / year (installed) $36.19 x 105 - $3,800 / 3 = $1,266/yr SUBTOTAL: $3,766 5. Litter containers concrete container replacement schedule # /yr x $/unit = $/yr 3 x $350.00 = $1,050.00/yr SUBTOTAL: $1,050 .... . .--~-._._...,._,-------_..,_..,..~-- --- - 6. Additional staffmg requirements a. Additional labor for enhanced planter @ prevailing wage hrs/yr x $/hr = $/YR. 830 hrs/yr x $18.00 = $14,940.oo/yr b. Additional labor for clean up and litter control @ prevailing wage. hrs/yr x $/hr = $/YR 1,250 x $18.00 = $22,500.00 c. Overtime for special events # / events x # hrs x prevailing wage rate x OT factor = $/yr 10 x 4 hrs/event x $18 x 1.5(x) = $1,080.oo/yr d. Holiday (double time rate) #/holidays/yr x $/hr x #/hrs/holiday x holiday rate = $/year 5 x $18.00 x 8 hr x 2.0 (x) = $1,440.oo/yr SUBTOTAL: $39,960 7. Trellis Repair and Replacement In 1998 the trellis' were used as platforms for lighted Christmas decorations and found to be structurally inadequate to support the weight of lighting technicians. # trellises x cost/reinforcement = $ cost of improvement 7 x $500.00 = $3,500.00 ongoing yearly cost: redo 3 each year = 3 x 500 = $1,5oo.oo/yr. SUBTOTAL: $3,500 TOTAL FIRST YEAR: $75,471 Total Subsequent Years: $71,311 h: Ihomelengineerlasmtdistlosdsltcenhanl.mem -- - - - - _.._--~-_.._-_._..-,_..,-,._._----~--_. .,.--.-----. ---'--~'--'-'-- TABLE 3 TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT - BUDGET FOR "AS IS" OPTION 568-044-23 300 E Street 90.5 115 10407.5 $991.02 568-044-22 208-12 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $547.53 568-044-21 < 214-18 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $547.53 568-044-20 . 222 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $547.53 568-044-19 224 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $547.53 568-044-18 226 Third Ave. 61.4 115.1 7067.14 $672.95 568-044-17 230 Third Ave. 23 115.2 2649.6 $252.30 568-044-16 232 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $548.48 568-044-15 234 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $548.48 568-044-14 236 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $548.48 568-044-13 242-44 Third Ave. 45 115.2 5184 $493.63 568-044-12 248 Third Ave. 40 115 4600 $438.02 568-071-01 201 Third Ave. 100 115.9 11590 $1,103.62 568-071-02 207-09 Third Ave. 50.6 115.9 5864.54 $558.43 568-071-03 215 Third Ave, 50 115.9 5795 $551.81 568-071-04 217 Third Ave. 25 115.9 2897.5 $275.91 568-071-05 221 Third Ave. 65.5 115.9 7591.45 $722.87 568-071-12 225 Third Ave. 46 115.9 5331.4 $507.67 568-071-13 227 Third Ave. 54 115.9 6258.6 $595.96 568-071-14 231 Third Ave. 50 115.8 5790 $551.34 568-071-15 239 Third Ave. 48 115.8 5558.4 $529.28 568-071-16 241-45 Third Ave. 66 115.9 7649.4 $728.39 568-071-17 247 Third Ave. 56.2 115.8 6507.96 $619.70 568-152-21 250-56 Third Ave. 75 115 8625 $821.29 568-152-20 258-80 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $547.53 568-152-19 262 Third Ave. 49.8 115 5727 $545.34 568-152-18 266-68 Third Ave. 54 115 6210 $591.33 568-152-17 270-76 Third Ave. 71.3 115 8199.5 $780.77 568-152-13 278-80 Third Ave. 40.4 115.3 4658.12 $443.56 568-152-16 282-84 Third Ave. 5650.9 $538.09 568-152-11 286 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $274.48 568-152-10 288 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $274.48 568-152-09 290 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $549.43 568-152-08 294-96 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $549.43 568-152-07 298 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $274.72 568-152-06 300 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $274.72 568-161-26 253-57 Third Ave. 60 107.8 6468 $615.90 568-161-03 259 Third Ave. 29.8 107.8 3212.44 $305.89 568-161-04 261 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-161-05 265 Third Ave. 20 107.8 2156 $205.30 568-161-06 267 Third Ave. 30 107.8 3234 $307.95 568-161-07 269 Third Ave. 25.6 107.8 2759.68 $262.78 568-161-37 271 Third Ave. 24.4 107.8 2630.32 $250.46 568-161-36 273 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-16j-09 275 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-161-10 279 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-161-11 281-83 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-161-12 285 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-161-13 289 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-161-27 291 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-161-28 295 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 ..-..--- -------~-_.._._-~._._-_.._--_._-~-"-_.~ ..-----.-------- 568-161-27 291 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-161-28 295 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-35 299 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-270-21 310 Third Ave. 57325 $13,358.56 568-270-22 320 Third Ave. 210 152.3 31983 $7,453.06 568-270-23 340 Third Ave. 98 152.3 14925.4 $3,478.10 568-300-46 378-98 Third Ave. 260.4 115.9 30180.36 $7,032.99 568-333-01 301-05 Third Ave. 82.5 107.8 8893.5 $2,072.47 568-333-02 307 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-03 309 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-04 311-13 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-333-05 315 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-06 317 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-07 319 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-333-08 321-23 Third Ave. 32.7 107.8 3525.06 $821.45 568-334-01 325-33 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $2,512.08 568-334-02 335 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-334-03 337 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-334-04 341-47 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $2,512.08 568-351-01 351 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-351-02 353 Third Ave. 28.5 107.8 3072.3 $715.94 568-351-03 355 Third Ave. 4950 $1,153.51 568-350-39 357-59 Third Ave. 4054 $944.71 568-350-40 365~9 Third Ave. 4805 $1,119.72 568-350-23 371 Third Ave. 1745 $406.64 568-350-25 373 Third Ave. 55 100 5500 $1,281.68 568-350-21 385-87 Third Ave. 50 109 5450 $1,270.02 568-350-20 389-91 Third Ave. 25 100 2500 $582.58 568-350-19 397 Third Ave. 100 100 10000 $2,330.32 TOTALS 512612.1 $119,455.00 h:\home\bethc\townctr3b.wb3 . 'H_ ____..________ ...- . ,.,-"_._--,, --- ----,.---..------- --- -- TABLE 4 TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT BUDGET FOR ENHANCED SERVICES OPTION Parcel Number Site Address Frontage Depth Area Assessed Amount 568-044-23 300 E Street 90.5 115 10407.5 $2,523.30 568-044-22 208-12 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-044-21 214-18 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-044-20 222 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-044-19 224 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-044-18 226 Third Ave. 61.4 115.1 7067.14 $1,713.43 568-044-17 230 Third Ave. 23 115.2 2649.6 $642.40 568-044-16 232 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,396.51 568-044-15 234 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,396.51 568-044-14 236 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,396.51 568-044-13 242-44 Third Ave. 45 115.2 5184 $1,256.86 568-044-12 248 Third Ave. 40 115 4600 $1,115.27 568-071-01 201 Third Ave. 100 115.9 11590 $2,810.00 568-071-02 207-09 Third Ave. 50.6 115.9 5864.54 $1,421.86 568-071-03 215 Third Ave, 50 115.9 5795 $1,405.00 568-071-04 217 Third Ave. 25 115.9 2897.5 $702.50 568-071-05 221 Third Ave. 65.5 115.9 7591.45 $1,840.55 568-071-12 225 Third Ave. 46 115.9 5331.4 $1,292.60 568-071-13 227 Third Ave. 54 115.9 6258.6 $1,517.40 568-071-14 231 Third Ave. 50 115.8 5790 $1,403.79 568-071-15 239 Third Ave. 48 115.8 5558.4 $1,347.63 568-071-16 241-45 Third Ave. 66 115.9 7649.4 $1,854.60 568-071-17 247 Third Ave. 56.2 115.8 6507.96 $1,577.85 568-152-21 250-56 Third Ave. 75 115 8625 $2,091.13 568-152-20 258-60 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,394.09 568-152-19 262 Third Ave. 49.8 115 5727 $1,388.51 568-152-18 266-68 Third Ave. 54 115 6210 $1,505.61 568-152-17 270-76 Third Ave. 71.3 115 8199.5 $1,987.97 568-152-13 278-80 Third Ave. 40.4 115.3 4658.12 $1,129.36 568-152-16 282-84 Third Ave. 5650.9 $1,370.06 568-152-11 286 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $698.86 568-152-10 288 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $698.86 568-152-09 290 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $1,398.94 568-152-08 294-96 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $1,398.94 568-152-07 298 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $699.47 568-152-06 300 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $699.47 568-161-26 253-57 Third Ave. 60 107.8 6468 $1,568.17 568-161-03 259 Third Ave. 29.8 107.8 3212.44 $778.86 568-161-04 261 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-05 265 Third Ave. 20 107.8 2156 $522.72 568-161-06 267 Third Ave. 30 107.8 3234 $784.08 568-161-07 269 Third Ave. 25.6 107.8 2759.68 $669.08 568-16'-37 271 Third Ave. 24.4 107.8 2630.32 $637.72 568-161-36 273 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-161-09 275 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-161-10 279 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-11 281-83 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-12 285 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-13 289 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-161-27 291 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-161-28 295 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-161-35 299 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 . ~--~-_._._------,-,_._-_._-_.._-_..--"..__... '-'_...~-. 568-161-35 299 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-270-21 310 Third Ave. 57325 $5,458.60 568-270-22 320 Third Ave. 210 152.3 31983 $3,045.49 568-270-23 340 Third Ave. 98 152.3 14925.4 $1,421.23 568-300-46 378-98 Third Ave. 260.4 115.9 30180.36 $2,873.83 568-333-01 301-05 Third Ave. 82.5 107.8 8893.5 $846.86 568-333-02 307 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-03 309 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-04 311-13 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-333-05 315 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-06 317 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-07 319 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-333-08 321-23 Third Ave. 32.7 107.8 3525.06 $335.66 568-334-01 325-33 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $1,026.49 568-334-02 335 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-334-03 337 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $256.62 568-334-04 341-47 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $1,026.49 568-351-01 351 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $513.25 568-351-02 353 Third Ave. 28.5 107.8 3072.3 $292.55 568-351-03 355 Third Ave. 4950 $471.35 568-350-39 357-59 Third Ave. 4054 $386.03 568-350-40 365-69 Third Ave. 4805 $457.54 568-350-23 371 Third Ave. 1745 $166.16 568-350-25 373 Third Ave. 55 100 5500 $523.72 568-350-21 385-67 Third Ave. 50 109 5450 $518.96 568-350-20 389-91 Third Ave. 25 100 2500 $238.06 568-350-19 397 Third Ave. 100 100 10000 $952.22 TOTALS 512612.1 $48,812.00 h:lhomelbethcltownctra.wb3 ______"___m _ .____...._~___~__._ TABLE 5 TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT BilLING FOR "AS IS" OPTION CONSIDERING RESERVES Parcel Number Site Address Frontage Depth Area Assessed Amount 568-044-23 300 E Street 90.5 115 10407.5 $243.88 568-044-22 208-12 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-044-21 214-18 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-044-20 222 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-044-19 224 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-044-18 226 Third Ave. 61.4 115.1 7067.14 $165.60 568-044-17 230 Third Ave. 23 115.2 2649.6 $62.09 568-044-16 232 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $134.97 568-044-15 234 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $134.97 568-044-14 236 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $134.97 568-044-13 242-44 Third Ave. 45 115.2 5184 $121.48 568-044-12 248 Third Ave. 40 115 4600 $107.79 568-071-01 201 Third Ave. 100 115.9 11590 $271.59 568-071-02 207-09 Third Ave. 50.6 115.9 5864.54 $137.42 568-071-03 215 Third Ave, 50 115.9 5795 $135.79 568-071-04 217 Third Ave. 25 115.9 2897.5 $67.90 568-071-05 221 Third Ave. 65.5 115.9 7591.45 $177.89 568-071-12 225 Third Ave. 46 115.9 5331.4 $124.93 568-071-13 227 Third Ave. 54 115.9 6258.6 $146.66 568-071-14 231 Third Ave. 50 115.8 5790 $135.68 568-071-15 239 Third Ave. 48 115.8 5558.4 $130.25 568-071-16 241-45 Third Ave. 66 115.9 7649.4 $179.25 568-071-17 247 Third Ave. 56.2 115.8 6507.96 $152.50 568-152-21 250-56 Third Ave. 75 115 8625 $202.11 568-152-20 258-60 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $134.74 568-152-19 262 Third Ave. 49.8 115 5727 $134.20 568-152-18 266-68 Third Ave. 54 115 6210 $145.52 568-152-17 270-76 Third Ave. 71.3 115 8199.5 $192.14 568-152-13 278-80 Third Ave. 40.4 115.3 4658.12 $109.15 568-152-16 282-84 Third Ave. 5650.9 $132.42 568-152-11 286 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $67.55 568-152-10 288 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $67.55 568-152-09 290 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $135.21 568-152-08 294-96 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $135.21 568-152-07 298 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $67.60 568-152-06 300 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $67.60 568-161-26- 253-57 Third Ave. 60 107.8 6468 $151.56 568-161-03 259 Third Ave. 29.8 107.8 3212.44 $75.28 568-161-04 261 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-161-05 265 Third Ave. 20 107.8 2156 $50.52 568-161-06 267 Third Ave. 30 107.8 3234 $75.78 568-161-07 269 Third Ave. 25.6 107.8 2759.68 $64.67 568-161-37. 271 Third Ave. 24.4 107.8 2630.32 $61.64 568-161-36 273 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-161-09 275 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-161-10 279 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-161-11 281-83 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-161-12 285 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-161-13 289 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 --,-"._.,..~-_..._---~, _ HH' n__ ~,._~.._----_....-,.,..~-_._--_.._._-~._--~._..._------..- - --.-.,.------------ 568-161-27 291 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-161-28 295 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-161-35 299 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-270-21 310 Third Ave. 57325 $1,343.30 568-270-22 320 Third Ave. 210 152.3 31983 $749.46 568-270-23 340 Third Ave. 98 152.3 14925.4 $349.75 568-300-46 378-98 Third Ave. 260.4 115.9 30180.36 $707.22 568-333-01 301-05 Third Ave. 82.5 107.8 8893.5 $208.40 568-333-02 307 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-03 309 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-04 311-13 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-333-05 315 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-06 317 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-07 319 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-333-08 321-23 Third Ave. 32.7 107.8 3525.06 $82.60 568-334-01 325-33 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $252.61 568-334-02 335 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-334-03 337 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $63.15 568-334-04 341-47 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $252.61 568-351-01 351 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $126.30 568-351-02 353 Third Ave. 28.5 107.8 3072.3 $71.99 568-351-03 355 Third Ave. 4950 $115.99 568-350-39 357-59 Third Ave. 4054 $95.00 568-350-40 365-69 Third Ave. 4805 $112.60 568-350-23 371 Third Ave. 1745 $40.89 568-350-25 373 Third Ave. 55 100 5500 $128.88 568-350-21 385-87 Third Ave. 50 109 5450 $127.71 568-350-20 389-91 Third Ave. 25 100 2500 $58.58 568-350-19 397 Third Ave. 100 100 10000 $234.33 TOTALS 512612.1 $12,012.00 h:lhomelbethcltownctr1 b.wb3 ---------~_..._"'~-_.- TABLE 6 TOWN CENTRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT BILLING FOR ENHANCED SERVICES CONSIDERING RESERVES Parcel Number Site Address Frontage Depth Area Assessed Amount 568-044-23 300 E Street 90.5 115 10407.5 $2,425.28 568-044-22 208-12 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339.93 568-044-21 214-18 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339.93 568-044-20 222 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339.93 568-044-19 224 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339.93 568-044-18 226 Third Ave. 61.4 115.1 7067.14 $1,646.87 568-044-17 230 Third Ave. 23 115.2 2649.6 $617.44 568-044-16 232 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,342.26 568-044-15 234 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,342.26 568-044-14 236 Third Ave. 50 115.2 5760 $1,342.26 568-044-13 242-44 Third Ave. 45 115.2 5184 $1,208.04 568-044-12 248 Third Ave. 40 115 4600 $1,071.95 568-071-01 201 Third Ave. 100 115.9 11590 $2,700.84 568-071-02 207-09 Third Ave. 50.6 115.9 5864.54 $1,366.63 568-071-03 215 Third Ave, 50 115.9 5795 $1,350.42 568-071-04 217 Third Ave. 25 115.9 2897.5 $675.21 568-071-05 221 Third Ave. 65.5 115.9 7591.45 $1.769.05 568-071-12 225 Third Ave. 46 115.9 5331.4 $1,242.39 568-071-13 227 Third Ave. 54 115.9 6258.6 $1,458.45 568-071-14 231 Third Ave. 50 115.8 5790 $1,349.26 568-071-15 239 Third Ave. 48 115.8 5558.4 $1,295.29 568-071-16 241-45 Third Ave. 66 115.9 7649.4 $1,782.55 568-071-17 247 Third Ave. 56.2 115.8 6507.96 $1,516.56 568-152-21 250-56 Third Ave. 75 115 8625 $2,009.90 568-152-20 258-60 Third Ave. 50 115 5750 $1,339.93 568-152-19 262 Third Ave. 49.8 115 5727 $1,334.57 568-152-18 266-68 Third Ave. 54 115 6210 $1,447.13 568-152-17 270-76 Third Ave. 71.3 115 8199.5 $1,910.75 568-152-13 278-80 Third Ave. 40.4 115.3 4658.12 $1,085.49 568-152-16 282-84 Third Ave. 5650.9 $1,316.84 568-152-11 286 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $671.71 568-152-10 288 Third Ave. 25 115.3 2882.5 $671.71 568-152-09 290 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $1,344.59 568-152-08 294-96 Third Ave. 50 115.4 5770 $1,344.59 568-152-07 298 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $672.30 568-152-06 300 Third Ave. 25 115.4 2885 $672.30 568-161-26 253-57 Third Ave. 60 107.8 6468 $1,507.25 568-161-03 259 Third Ave. 29.8 107.8 3212.44 $748.60 568-161-04 261 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-05 265 Third Ave. 20 107.8 2156 $502.42 568-161-06 267 Third Ave. 30 107.8 3234 $753.63 568-161-07 269 Third Ave. 25.6 107.8 2759.68 $643.09 568-161-37 271 Third Ave. 24.4 107.8 2630.32 $612.95 568-161-36 273 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-161-09 275 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 568-161-10 279 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-11 281-83 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-12 285 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,256.04 568-161-13 289 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $628.02 "--- ----,.". -. - -"---------_._-----~.__._._- 568-270-21 310 Third Ave. 57325 $13,898.45 568-270-22 320 Third Ave. 210 152.3 31983 $7,754.28 568-270-23 340 Third Ave. 98 152.3 14925.4 $3,618.66 568-300-46 378-98 Third Ave. 260.4 115.9 30180.36 $7,317.23 568-333-01 301-05 Third Ave. 82.5 107.8 8893.5 $2,156.23 568-333-02 307 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-333-03 309 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-333-04 311-13 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-333-05 315 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-333-06 317 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-333-07 319 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-333-08 321-23 Third Ave. 32.7 107.8 3525.06 $854.65 568-334-01 325-33 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $2,613.61 568-334-02 335 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-334-03 337 Third Ave. 25 107.8 2695 $653.40 568-334-04 341-47 Third Ave. 100 107.8 10780 $2,613.61 568-351-01 351 Third Ave. 50 107.8 5390 $1,306.81 568-351-02 353 Third Ave. 28.5 107.8 3072. 3 $744.88 568-351-03 355 Third Ave. 4950 $1,200.13 568-350-39 357-59 Third Ave. 4054 $982.89 568-350-40 365-69 Third Ave. 4805 $1,164.97 568-350-23 371 Third Ave. 1745 $423.08 568-350-25 373 Third Ave. 55 100 5500 $1,333.48 568-350-21 385-87 Third Ave. 50 109 5450 $1,321.35 568-350-20 389-91 Third Ave. 25 100 2500 $606.13 568-350-19 397 Third Ave. 100 100 10000 $2,424.50 TOTALS 512612.1 $124,283.00 h:lhomelbethcltownctr2a. wb3 --- -" ---------."- ... _.__._-----_..~--_._-.__.__.._--- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ItemE Meeting Date 7/27/99 ITEM TITLE: Resolution /955'1 Waiving the consultant selection process, approving the Second Ämendment to the Agreement with DKS Associates for an Adaptive Traffic Control System (CIP-TF237) Phase II, and authorizing the Mayor to execute the amendment SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~ REVIEWED BY: C"y M~,g~~ "() ~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_NoX) The City of Chula Vista has received State approval to utilize federal funds under the Federal Intennodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (IS TEA), Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) program to upgrade the City's traffic control system to a state of the art flexible timing Adaptive Traffic Control system. The first phase of a three phase project was awarded to DKS Associates by Resolution 18106 ofthe City Council on November 14,1995. Program Supplement Agreement No. 008 Rev. 1 between the City and the State will assure State reimbursement to the City for all costs associated with the traffic signal system upon following appropriate invoicing procedures set forth by CalTrans Local Assistance Office. DKS Associates has now essentially completed Phase I of the project and the City is prepared to move forward with Phase II. The contract with DKS has a provision that the City can, at its option, extend the contract to cover Phase II. Since DKS Associates has spent the past four years developing all of the necessary data and technology to follow this project through to completion, and it would be highly unlikely that another consultant would be able to step in and take over the project without significant delays and additional cost to the City, and whereas DKS Associates has demonstrated the necessary expertise to successfully complete Phase I in a professional manner, staff is recommending that the City move forward with the project without an additional consultant selection process, allowing DKS Associates to complete Phase II of the project. RECOMMENDATION: That Council waive the consultant selection process as impractical, approve the second amendment to the agreement with DKS to proceed with Phase II of the project, and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf ofthe City. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The City's current traffic control system, referred to as an Urban Traffic Control "UTC" system (JHK series 2000), interfaces with 142 traffic signals. Coordination of traffic signals are implemented /.3-/ - ---_.~._..~_._.~_._-----_._._---_...._.__._-_...- Page 2, Item /3 Meeting Date 7/27/99 in this system by running "fixed cycle" signal timing plans at different times of the day and different days of the week. The "fixed cycle" timing plans are based on pre-determined peak traffic volumes taken during different times of the day or week. The timing plans assume that the same traffic volume patterns will remain fixed during these pre-determined time periods. This system is, thus, limited in its ability to adapt and respond automaticalJy to variations in peak hour volumes and the times these variations occur, particularly when considering future traffic demands that wilJ be placed on the City's circulation system as a result of expected future growth. Recently, this system has experienced failures on a regular basis which has required staff to spend excessive time monitoring and making necessary repairs. Since many of these failures take place at night or on weekends, staff has been forced to work overtime to keep this system operating. Approval of this project will save the City money in the immediate future and provide better service levels to the citizens of Chula Vista for the long term. The proposed adaptive traffic control is a dynamic system that uses real time, electronicalJy colJected, traffic volume data. The adaptive traffic control system continuously measures traffic demands on all approaches to signalized intersections and transmits this information to a master controlJer which, in turn, electronicalJy adjusts the timing of affected signals. The timing and coordination of traffic signals is performed continuously, thereby responding to ever changing traffic flow conditions. The adaptive traffic control system is considered to be the state of the art in coordinating and optimizing the sequence of timing traffic signal system networks. The cost to implement this new state of the art traffic control system is being made available to the City ofChula Vista under the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act ISTEA), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) program through the State and our regions transportation agency, SANDAG. Implementation of the new Adaptive Traffic Control System was planned to take place in three stages over a three to five year period for a total cost of approximately $2,000,000. Phase I Phase I ($200,000), was a system design study. This phase of the project provides a listing and specifications of the computer software and hardware required. AdditionalJy, this phase provided construction drawings for modifYing 10 adjacent signalized intersections. This phase of the project has essentialJy been completed and we are now prepared to move into Phase II. Phase II Phase II consists of the purchase of traffic control equipment and software and the instalJation of vehicle detection and signal modifications at 10 locations. Approximately $700,000 of CMAQ funding wilJ be needed to implement this phase of the project. The City's request for CMAQ /3- ?- -..------'" -. --- - ..._----._--~~--_.._-----_.~-~-_.. -~._._- - --..-.. .-....- Page 3, Item /3 Meeting Date 7/27/99 funding from the 1996 appropriation for this phase has received regional approval from SANDAG. This phase appears in the FY 1996 regional transportation program as amendment number 5. The requested $700,000 of CMAQ funds will be available on a reimbursement process through CalTrans' Local Assistance Office. Phase III Phase III, which consists of the installation of vehicle detectors and signal modifications at the remaining signalized locations, will be evaluated upon completion of Phase II. The cost to implement this last phase is estimated to be $1,100,000. The City's request for additional CMAQ funding from the 1997 FY program for phase three has not received approval from the San Diego Traffic Engineering Council (SANTEe), a SANDAG standing committee. SANTEC is charged with the responsibility of reviewing CMAQ candidate projects applications from jurisdictions throughout the region and recommending to the SANDAG Board of Directors which projects should receive CMAQ funding. This phase is, therefore, dependent upon funding availability. DKS has the most hands on experience with adaptive traffic control systems and a strong team of individuals who have a good reputation for their expertise in this field. They demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the City's existing system and understanding of our objectives. In addition, they did the design work and, in order to move into the construction phase, it is necessary to have their expertise in the area and specific knowledge of the project to assist with the contract. In light of the above, staff believes DKS is uniquely qualified to perfonn the consultant services for Phase II of the project. The original agreement did contemplate the award of Phase II work to DDS, but did not require it. Accordingly, staff recommends that, pursuant to the waiver policy in Municipal Code Section 2.56.070, the consultant selection process for Phase II be waived as impractical. Scope of Consultant Agreement 1. The attached DKS Project Work Scope-Phase II (Exhibit B) being considered by Council includes eight (8) tasks to be completed over a 13-month period. The Scope of Work as listed below is made a part of the original agreement and is subject to the same tenns and condition: A. Oversee contractor implementation of system hardware and software. B. Oversee contractor's field implementation at up to ten (10) intersections C. Prepare system setup parameters D. Monitor system's acceptance testings E. Fine tune and calibrate system parameters in the field F. Perfonn "before" and "after" studies G. Provide training for City staff H. Prepare system documentation /3--3 __ ______0. ___.___ _.~~___._ _______._..~..__ Page 4, Item/3 Meeting Date 7/27/99 Agreement The agreement with DKS Associates is presented in the form of an amendment to the original agreement with DKS which used the City's standard two-party form. Under this contract, DKS Associates agrees to perform the Scope of Work as outlined in Exhibit B for a single fixed fee of $120,000. This has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's Office. Funding There is a current balance of$468,302 in TF237 as of May 26,1999. An additional $262,810 was approved by the FY 99/00 CIP Budget. The grant will enable the City to undertake a betterment project that we would not otherwise be able to do with our limited Traffic Signal funding. Adequate funds have been appropriated through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). FISCAL IMPACT: Funding in the amount 0£$700,000, of which $120,000 is for the consultant agreement, will be provided by CalTrans under the CMAQ Federal Grant program. The construction engineering for this project will be performed by DKS Associates consulting firm under the direction of Traffic Engineering staff. All associated staff time and consultant services will be charged against the project and reimbursed by the State under the provisions ofthe CMAQ Federal grant. Since this is a fixed fee contract, there will be no additional costs unless the City determines that additional work is required. In that case, staff would evaluate the amount of funding available for the desired additional work and make a recommendation accordingly. July 22, 1999 (I 1:07am) File: 0735-10 TF237 BN-003 H:\HOMEIENGINEERIAGENDA IPHASE2DK.RRL /3-1- . ----..-----.." ".."---.--- r:í RESOLUTION NO. /955f RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS, APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH DKS ASSOCIATES FOR AN ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM (CIP-TF237) PHASE 2, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the city of Chula Vista has received State approval to utilize federal funds under the Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) , Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) program to upgrade the city's traffic control system to a state of the art flexible timing Adaptive Traffic Control system; and WHEREAS, the first phase of a three phase project was awarded to DKS Associates by Resolution 18106 of the City Council on November 14, 1995; and WHEREAS, Program Supplement Agreement No.008 Rev.1 between the City and the State will assure State reimbursement to the City for all costs associated with the traffic signal system upon following appropriate invoicing procedures set forth by Caltrans Local Assistance Office; and WHEREAS, DKS Associates has now essentially completed Phase 1 of the project and the City is prepared to move forward with Phase 2; and WHEREAS, the contract with DKS has a provision that the City can, at its option, extend the contract to cover Phase 2 and since, DKS Associates has spent the past four years developing all of the necessary data and technology to follow this project through to completion, it would be highly unlikely that another consultant would be able to step in and take over the project without significant delays and additional cost to the City; and WHEREAS, DKS Associates has demonstrated the necessary expertise to successfully complete phase I in a professional manner, staff is recommending that the City move forward with the project allowing DKS Associates to complete Phase 2 of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED based on the facts set forth above, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby waive the consultant selection process as impractical under Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.070, approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with DKS Associates for an Adaptive Traffic Control System (CIP-TF237) Phase 2, in the form presented, 1 /3- 5 a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt , Director of Public Works H:\home\attorney\reso\DKS.2ND 2 r3-~ -'-"-"'_._-~--'-'- SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND DKS ASSOCIATES FOR AN ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADE THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR AN ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADE (AMENDMENT) is entered into as of July 27, 1999, by and between the City of Chula Vista (City), a municipal Chartered corporation of the State of California, and DKS Associates (Consultant), a Corporation. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has approved an agreement (Agreement) with DKS Associates dated November 14,1995 and approved by Resolution 18106; and WHEREAS, the Agreement was amended by that certain First Amendment approved on November 11, 1996, by Council Resolution No. 18491, and WHEREAS, the Agreement, as amended, provides that the City of Chula Vista can, at its option, extend this contract to Phase II ofthe project, and WHEREAS, an amount of$120,000 was appropriated to fund Phase II of the project, and WHEREAS, both the City and Consultant desire to amend the Agreement with this Second Amendment to include Phase II of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as foJlows: 1. Exhibit A, Sections 8 and 11 of the Agreement is hereby amended to include additional tasks and a performance and payment schedule to implement Phase II of the project as more fuJly described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. In Section 7, line of the Agreement, the word "conduct" shaJl be replaced with the word "misconduct". 3. Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shaJl remain in fuJl force and effect. END OF PAGE. NEXT PAGE IS SIGNATURE PAGE H:IHOMEIENGINEERITRAFFICIDKS2.FP 13-1 ......--..- .---.-------.-- -_._~~~._. ,._--~_._--_.__.- .~----_. Signature Page to Second Amendment to the Agreement between City ofChula Vista and DKS Associates for an Adaptive Traffic Signal System IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: City of Chula Vista by: Shirley Horton, Mayor Attest: Susan Bigelow, City Clerk Approved as to form: John M. Kaheny, City Attorney Dated: DKS Associates By: Exhibit List to Amendment (X) Exhibit B H:\HOMEIENGINEERITRAFFICIDKS2.FP /3-l? - - - -"._.~_._--_...__.._-----_._---_._._._--- -~.~-_.,-_.. Jul-02-99 03:36P P.03 EXHIBIT B I PROJECT 'WORK SCOPE - PHASE II 1. General Description Phase II of the Adaptive Traffic Signal System includes procurement of system hardware and software. and field construction of detectors and equipment upgrades at eight (8) locations with additional two (2) optional locations. In this phase. DKS Associates. together with subconsultam ADV ANTEC Consulting Engineers. wilJ serve as System Manager to oversee the implementation of the new system, including hardware and software development at the comrol center. and field implementation at J 0 intersections. The DKS/ ADV ANTEC team will monitor the system setup and caiibration. oversee system testing. training and user's manual documentation by the contractor, as well as perform "before" and "after" studies to ensure that the system performs accordmg to the performance cntenz. I 2. Tasks Outline " Oversee contra::tor implememation OT system Í1ardware and software b Oversee contractor's field implementation at up to ten (J 0) mterse::tions c Prepare system setup parameters d. Monitor system's acceptance testings e Fine tune and calibrate system parameters in the field f Perform "before" and "after" studies g. Provide training for City staIr h. Prepare system documentation 3. Description of Tasks Task A: Oversee contractor implementation DKS Associates will monitor the contractor's progress in delivenng the hardware and software \I\on,hly progress meeÜngs will be attended with the comractor in the City ofChula Vista to monitor contractor" s schedule adherence. During system delivery. regular site visits will be maàe to monitor performance of the contractor. Any potential schedule or performance problems will be promptly idemified and reponed to City staff. Task B: Oversee contractor's field implementation The DKS/.W\' ANTEC team will visit the field approximately twice each week to review the contractor's field implementation of the system detection and local intersection moàifications. If any problems are identified. a punch list will be devdoped (copied to City staff) to inform ,he conr~actor of any corrections necessary. DKS/AD V ANTEC ChuJz Vista Adaptive Traffie Signal System Page ] 13~Î __.__U_~_____._'__.'____._.____ Jul-02-99 D3:37P P_04 T",I. C: Dr-"elop s~'stem setup pararnelers An important aspect of any adaptive teaffic signal system is suitable set-up and cahbration rur eëC;! intersection. DKS/ ADV ANTEC team will develop a set of initial parameters jointly with the contractor. Depending on the adaptive system seleered. some of these parameters may incluòe · Saturation flow per approach · Saturation occupancy per approach · Maximum queue · Green start lag · Green end lag · Main arterial designation · Default offset Task D: Monitor system's acceptance testings Accep.-ance testing proceduees wi]] be defined in the contract. It wi]] be the primary responsibility of the contractor to perform acceptance testings. The DKS/ADVANTEC team will monitor the acee;>:ance restings performed by the contractor and review the results. Two sets of acceptanc~ testing wi]1 be performed Bench Testing will Involve testing of the master computer and the iocal controllers connected in the control center (or the Consultant's office) and installed with the initial set-up parameters. Simulated detection inputs wi]] be made. The purpose is to test the dif!erenl functions of the master and local controlJer software under simulated field conåitions. Field Testing will be made upon completion of bench testing and field installation. Actllal field operations wi]] be observed and the different functionalities tested. Task E: Fine tune and calibrate system parameters in the field It is expected that. even ,,~th rigorous acceptance testing. fine tuning and calibration of the system parameters may be required during the ¡nitial period of operation in the field. The DKS/ ADV A'\TTEC t earn wi]] be present during the system turn-on to monitor the changeover to the new system. Foe an iniriaJ period of approximately one month. the DKS/ ADV A1>ITEC team will work with City staff to observe actua] field operations. fine tune the system, and adjust the set-up parameters to regulate the effectiveness of the system. Task F: Perform "before" and "after" studies Before the system changeover take place. DKS Associates will perform floating car surveys on a ,ypical weekday to establish the "before" study. Survey routes will be pre-established to represent the major traffic movements. Stops and delays wi]] be registered in a laptop computer designed for such surveys. After the new system is installed and calibrated. DKS wi]] perform a similar rloating car survey to establish the "after" study. Results of the before and after study will be reported !O the City in a technical memorandum. DKS/AD~~4NTEC Chula Vista Aàaptivr; Trnffic: Signal Syst~m Page 2 / 3 -/0 ... ------- ------------------------ Jul-02-99 03:37P P_OS Task G: Pro"id~ trainin¡: for Cit~· stafT The contractor is required to proviòe training courses for City staff AOVAI\"TEC will coordInate and review training agenda and curricula with contractor. and assist in the training courses Task H: Prepare system documentation The contraetor is required to provide complete system documentation and USCTS manual. The OKS/ADV ANTEC team will review these documents prior to acceptance by the City. The OKS! ADV AAìEC team will also assist the City to negotiate extended warranty or maintenance contracts with the contractor should the city so desires. The DKS/ ADV ANTEC team will provide a report which documents the system as installed in Chula Vista. This will augment the generic documentation typically provided by the vendor. 4. PROJECT PRlCE The total budget estimate for basic services for engin~nng is a FIxed Fe~ amount of$J20,OOO. The aliDcation Dfnours and CDsts itemized by Tasks in the WDrk Scop~ is lisled on the follDwin!! Page 4 5. PROJECT SCHEDULE The fìDW chart and proposed schedule fDr the project is included in thIs proposai Dn Page 5 DKSIADVANTEC ChuJa Vista Adaptiyc T;affic Signal SyslCIr. Page 3 /""3-// .-----,._------~--_._- Jul-02-99 03:37P P.D6 Cir~ of Chula Vista Adapri..~ Signal S~·st~m Phase II Cost Estímar~ for S}'stem Management DKS Associat~/ADVA.:~TEC Consulting £ngin~rs ""BlJDGET ESTIMATE T ota] Total Hours Cost Task A. Oversee hardware and sDftware 270 $29,050 implementation B. Oversee cDntractor's field imlementatiDn 208 $18,520 C Develop system acceptance testings 100 $J 1,100 D Monitor system's acceptance testmgs 200 $2] _530 ~ t'metune and calibrate system parameters 148 $ ] 7,1 00 r. Perfonn before and after studies 80 S7,200 G. Provide training for City staff 40 $5,000 H. Prepare system dDcumentatiDn 60 $5,400 1 ]06 Total Basic Services Estimate $114,900 Other Direct Costs Travel (mileage 8000 miles (aJ $031/mile) $2,480 Printing. communications, etc. $2,620 Total Other Direct Costs Estimate S5,100 TOTAL FIXED PRlCE AMOUNT $120,000 -The allocation of hours and costs shown has been utilized to prepare the proposed budget estimate for Basic Services. DKS Associates may reallocate costs and adjust hours within the tasks for the budget estimate as required during delivery of professional services to suit the requirements of the project, subject to maintaining the fixed fee amount. DKS/ADVANTEC Chula ViS1a Adaptivc Traffic SignaJ Syslem Page 4 13-1~ ----,-_._----.._-- ____"_·__n"____,,_"".._____._ _______._____ H'____ --._-~--,------- Jul-QZ-99 03:3BP P.07 ~ ~.§ r;.. ~ ::: ~ . § .~ .; ~ ~ ~ Ë :; I~=-'t- ..:....-_«. ;:: IF ---_. . .. '.. ....... ...... ., 't: ~ .- I..... - I"" c..--: '~ I : =-:.:: ~ , 'v N I ''''<'''1' ~ D.t' ::: I 10= - .E ~ . '_ :: c: ~ ';..... IJ = I.. I. ... ¡: c:: == -....... ....---.....-.----......--- ...-..._._ "___. 1:J .."'- "_ C C!'I ~ ~~.~ E - < " ····..·-r..·..·uom.. ~ ............................ ................ :3 K K - - ~ ~ "" = ==... t: C ... :::: < ~c.c ::;...¡ -- . ~.- - ~ - ~ 1- ----- 0 E"§ ------! ~......____.... .~:O: _ _I ~...... I~· -= -:: õ = ~ =: '- ~ I :: - - '-C::Z::;c..- -- -:;_ .;:~r. - ~ =" j _ -- = ~ i . ~ ';:; = .::: _ ~ .::: - , .::::.::;;;: I -: .: :.. .: I ..~ ..: -= I - __:J;rJJ~1 I-·':::::¡L.:.. ~:U= ~ :"... ! '~=v;, .::;..···7.. ...;..... -'" ~ -,/ I ........ - I or ~ J I "'.. - I : :- en :.~::=,... 'I..... ¡ ~-- - I-:.¡-', .- -- - ': ,~- ~ I:: or, r,'_ =:'=::'..:>t: u ~~ 2t- I~~~ ì :=1 ~ i I~ ;; ~ = ...... = ~ ~ :§ ~___...m..; ~ I ~ 1..-..................... _I.I.J CICI"-'''':::: _ =: - ... 0_=_ .:111:__ .::-:= ..: ~.=~g :: .xõ~5"E w - ~:.,¡ "'OQJ__ = u.,¡'.=I-= < - E ;êBe; w ~;E?:::: =: .= .----. ë ~;. ~ r: -.._q....._- ~ ;:; -Ê =§',ª Uh__..__..hU__...... I .:- - G :::!::¡;; ;¡: e=-~t:t: rI) == ~ "E êf ~.~ I . .~ § 5 ;; ~ ,- ""'~--- ~ ----~I ". - If'; I::::: :::..-.= ::' :: ~ õ ;;; ... ..... '-' I ~ ....;.... c..o ~ ;.; - u -.2-= - ;.. 0 - 11,.I ;.- I I;...::! - ~. u u : ::..,:§ ~ .; E ............i: ,~~.~ ~ ~ r··...·· . .":" 1< :¿ ¿ Vi ~ ¡ I::: I:> -= :=: g:,:: : ~ - ~ I .. .. ........ .. J..... ................ ......._............ ............ ...... ... -, I ~ ~- I ' ¡ ~ ~; ;":= ~ : I ~ -------..--...--.---- --...--..--.+----.-----..--....----- i ª ~ w I I - '- "¡;; - ! N .:: ~ ::: ~ !:.... ¡; ë 52 tj ¡:---: ..::: '= VI v.-"" 1:--. ..... ~ !l¡~·······..··..·-···......··..-·..·..·····..···· i~ - -:;:-'" 6:;:; I:;; u___~jðJ ~2~~ ~ . . ... .-.---------.---..------. --------- -----.._-- ----- 13-1~ + ~-~-"~-----_._-~-,-+._---_.._. -------- ! July 12, 1999 \ MEMo TO, City a"k ¡¡pJ( FROM: Patty Wesp ~ , SUBJECT: -MAYOR'S REPORT - JULY 20th . Mayor Horton has requested that the following ratifications be docketed for the Council meeting of July 20th: Linda Baughman - Economic Development Commission Michael Palomo - Human Relations Commission Arturo Herrera - 1nt Friendship Commission A. Y. Casillas - Veterans Advisory Commission Thank you very much! cc: Mayor Horton , ^^ U_~_..__.____.____.__..___..,,___.__ _.,. _ _... ....~___,____..____._.__._