The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 1995/02/07 It of perjury that 1 am '" declare under pe.~a. ~ '"h..':O Vista in the .....1 ._. #! b;} t!"c (;rcj o¡ v..,...· ,hød em",;o"e. ',., CI#I. -;-....<¡ t\~e,t 1 PO$~_ , -,' -"e' . e~" <,-,"'- ' O:·~~cc \}1 '-...... --',.," ""-,1"\ Ð"t¡,~tiq Board at ", "',r":;'~:"I on t:... L...... t:,'. (,c.en'F"~'·:_ ~.. ~in' Gnd.at City '::Ial~ Tuesday, February 7, 1995 ti'e~u:'I'C ;"r/~Ç-"';I~NED ¿. i'~ ... Council Chambers 4:00 p.m. [);:U ;:.!h ~ j' 7 V Public Services Building Re~ular Meetin~ of the City of Chula Visla City Council CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Fox _, Moot _, Padilla _, Rindone _, and Mayor Horton _. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 24, 1995 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: a. Proclamations honoring winners of IIVoice of Democracyll contest. Mayor Horton will present the proclamations to: Maureen DeRuntz, Mar Vista High School; Amanda Leming, Castle Park High School; Wendy Paff, Bonita Vista High School; and Brian Sayers, Chula Vista High School. b. Oath of Office: Cultural Arts COIDDÙssion - Amira Walker; Safety COIDDÙssion - Douglas E. Cochrane. c. Proclaiming the week of February 5 through February 11, 1995 as "South Bay Enviromnental Awareness Week." The proclamation will be presented by Mayor Horton to Frank Roseman, Conunodore of the Tall Ship Society of San Diego County. ***** Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now reconvene into open session to report any final actions taken in closed session and to atljoum the meeting. Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However, final actions reported will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office. ***** CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 1/) The staff recomme1UÚltions regarding the following items listed under the Consent Cale1UÚlr will be enacted by the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak Fonn" availnble in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green fonn to speak in favor of the staff recommenOOtion; complete the pink fonn to speak in opposition to the staff recommenootion.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and Commission Recomme1UÚltions and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that there were no observed reportable actions taken from the Closed Session of 1/24/95. It is recommended that the letter be received and filed. -..---.......-----.-- -_....._- ----..-------.-.-..--,-.-,.-.-"'''''. --~_.__..__._--_.._~-------~-,.__._-----_._----- - Agenda -2- February 7, 1995 b. Letter of resignation from the Veterans Advisory Commission - Nicholas S. Aguilar, 936 Redbud Rd., Chuta Vista, CA 91910. It is recommended that the resignation be accepted with regret and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according to the Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library. c. Letter requesting financial support in sponsoring attendance at the 1994 Youth Leadership Conference at Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania - Larissa Martinez, 2499 Golfcrest Loop, Chula Vista, CA 91915. it is recommended that $100 of the Council Contingency Account be granted witb the understanding tbat in exchange for receiving the funds Ms. Martinez will make presentations to two of the City's youth or community groups. d. Letter of resignation from the Economic Development Commission (Ex-Officio) - Charles E. Sutherland, 1891 Nirvana Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91911. it is recommended that the resignation be accepted with regret and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according to the Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library. e. Letter requesting the City prohibit smoking in bingo halls - Group of concerned citizens. It is recommended that, as an interim measure, staff be directed to contact the various bingo halls in the City encouraging that they take into consideration the concerns of non-smokers using their facilities by voluntarily providing better ventilated and separate areas for their non-smoking clientele. Further, that staff meet with the bingo hall operators to receive their input before bringing back an ordinance prohibiting smoking in bingo balls. 6.A. ORDINANCE 2621 CREATING A ffiGH TECH/BIO TECH ZONE, CREATING A SUBCOMMITTEE TO GOVERN CERTAIN MATTERS WITHIN THE HIGH TECH/BIO TECH ZONE OF THE CITY, AND DELEGATING CERTAIN AUTHORITY TO SAID SUBCOMMITTEE (second readin~ and adoption) - The proposal is to officially implement previously approved project processing streamlining measures within the EastLake Business Center and EastLake Planned Community. Staff reconunends Council place the ordinances on second reading and adoption. (Director of Planning and Director of Conununity Development) B. ORDINANCE 2622 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON IS-95-11 (second readinR and adoption) 7. ORDINANCE 2623 AMENDING SECTION 10.56.040 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE - METER ZONES - DESIGNATED FEES - SCHEDULE XI (first readinR) - Staff conducted an analysis on tbe need to convert additional short-term meters to long-term meters in some of tbe downtown parking lots. The City Attorney determined that the authority to determine the proper configuration can be delegated to tbe City Engineer and could be done through an ordinance. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading. (Director of Community Development, Director of Finance, and Director of Public Works) 8. RESOLUTION 17799 APPROVING JOINT USE AGREEMENT WITH SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN CERTAIN FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH PALOMAR TROLLEY CENTER AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT - The development of the Palomar Trolley Center required the installation of a 66- inch storm drain and an 8-incb sewer line on the project site and the public street accessing the Metropolitan Transit Development Board trolley station as public improvements. The public improvements are placed within an SDG&E easement for transmission lines. SDG&E requests the Joint Use Agreement to govern tbe installation and maintenance of the public improvements. Staff recommends approval of tbe resolution. (Director of Community Development) ---.-..-.--.--....-- ---~_..._.. . M~__" _____..o_n ---.--.-".-------- Agenda -3- February 7, 1995 9. IlESOLtrfION 17800 AMENDING SCHEDULE V, SECTION 10.52.320 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE - STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKING - PROIDBITED DURING CERTAIN HOURS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE AtrfO PARK Pursuant to Assessment District 90-2, the City will be asked to accept the street improvements in tbe Auto Park, Auto Park Drive, and the extension of Brandywine Avenue. In accordance with the Otay Valley Redevelopment Plan and Auto Park Master Plan, both sides of the streets have been posted with "No Parking" signs. The Auto Park dealerships bave requested parking be allowed on the streets. Staff recommends approval of tbe resolution. (Director of Community Development and Director of Public Works) 10. RESOLtrfION 17801 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOil TREE TRIMMING SERVICES IN THE CITY - On 1/11/95, sealed bids were received for tree triIDDÙng services. The tree triIDDÙng project was budgeted for Fiscal Year 1994/95. The project includes tbe trimming of a total of 2,619 trees located at various locations. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 11. REPORT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1994 - State Government Code Section Number 66000 requires local agencies assessing Development Impact Fees (DIF) to make available specified financial data to the public each fiscal year and review the information at a public meeting. Local agencies are also required to make findings once each year for any funds remaining unexpended or uncolDDÙtted for five or more years. The fmdings must identify the purpose for the fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between tbe fee and tbe purpose for which it was cbarged. Staff recommends Council accept the report and approve the resolution. (Director of Finance and Director of Public Works) RESOLtrfION 17802 MAKING FINDINGS THAT THE UNEXPENDED FUNDS IN THE VARIOUS DIF FUNDS ARE STILL NEEDED TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES FOR WHEN THE FEES WERE COLLECTED * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLtrfIONS AND ORDINANCES The foUowing items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. ¡fyou wish to speak to any item, please.fill out the "Request to Speak Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green fonn to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink fonn to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to jive minutes per individual. 12. PUBLIC HEARING PCM-95-05; AMENDMENT TO THE RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) 1 PLAN PC DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO ALLOW BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A DENTAL PRACTICE AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO A DENTAL LABORATORY OF DENTAL APPLIANCE MANUFACTURING WITHIN THE EMPLOYMENT PAIlK LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (EP-lB) LAND USE DISTRICT OF THE RANCHO DEL REY BUSINESS CENTER - The proposed amendment is to allow dental offices as an accessory use to a permitted dental laboratory and dental appliance manufacturing. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading. (Director of Planning) ORDINANCE 2624 AMENDING CHAPTER IX-A. 1, PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES OF THE RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) I PLAN PC DISTRICT REGULATIONS (first readinl!) - __.___~._~._..~.________.__ _"___"_..~_"_ -.-0 ...._..._.__.__..__ _.._~.__..- ...-- .... -"-------~~-- Agenda -4- February 7, 1995 13. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF RATE INCREASE FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE - A public hearing was opened on 1/10/95 to consider a rate increase to cover increased rates paid by Laidlaw at the County landfill system since 10/1/94. Since only ten cities in the region were charged the higher rates, the differential rate was litigated. The public hearing was continued in anticipation that significant actions by the County might affect the amount of tbe rate change to be passed along to ratepayers. Landfill rates were subsequently reduced on 2/1/95, but reimbursement of the four months of differential cbarges is one issue to be addressed at a 2/22/95 settlement conference. Staff recommends the Duhlic hearißl! be continued to 2/28/95, (Deputy City Manager Krempl and Principal Management Assistant Snyder) Continued from the meeting of 1/10/95. 14. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERING ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING AB939 SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT (SRRE) AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT (HHWE) AND REAPPROVING THE SRRE AND HHWE - The SRRE and HHWE presented for approval bave not been cbanged since Council approved them on 12/15/92. A second approval of tbe documents is necessary to complete a new environmental review requirement imposed by the State. The new environmental review does not require a change in the contents of the documents previously approved and none is recommended. Staff recommends approval of tbe resolution. (Conservation Coordinator) RESOLUTION 17803 REAPPROVING THE SRRE AND HHWE AND AUTHORIZING THAT BOTH DOCUMENTS (AS AMENDED) BE SUBMITTED TO THE STATE FOR APPROVAL AND RESUBMITT AL TO THE COUNTY FOR INCLUSION IN THE COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN REGARDS THERETO ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the CouncU'sjurisdiction that is lJ!l1 an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State law, however, generally prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been fonvarded to them for consideration by one of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees. 15. REPORT ANNOUNCING CHANGE IN MEETING DAY FOR MONTH OF FEBRUARY, MARCH AND APRIL FOR INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP COMMISSION (Suzanne Ramirez, Chair, International Friendship COIDDÙssion) ____..._....___..o'____'.."'_.._____ ___._.~___n'_·__ _ .__.______..._ .._-.0-.. _________.._. _____.~__~_._. Agenda -5- February 7, 1995 ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public comments are limited to five minutes. 16. ORDINANCE 2625 AMENDING CHAPTER 18.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR THE POSTING BY DEVELOPERS OF ALTERNATIYE FORMS OF SECURITY FOR PUBLIC OR PRIVATE IMPROYEMENTS REQUIRING COMPLETION GUARANTIES IN FAVOR OF THE CITY AND MAKING MINOR TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS (first readit1l!) - The developers of the Channelside Shopping Center (which includes a 120,000 square foot Wal-Mart) are requesting that a Wal-Mart 'corporate guaranty' be accepted as security for the public improvements that the City and the Redevelopment Agency are requiring for the Project. Staff recommends Council place tbe ordinance on first reading. (Director of Community Development, Director of Public Works, and City Attorney) 17. RESOLUTION 17804 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A SUBDIVISION AND PRECISE PLAN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CHULA VISTA TOWN CENTRE ASSOCIATES, L.P., FOR THE PURPOSES OF COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 18 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE PRECISE PLAN RESOLUTION AND TENTATIYE MAP APPROVAL FOR THE CHANNELSIDE SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT - Before the Parcel Map is approved, the developer must either complete all the public improvements required as part of the project, or enter into an agreement to insure the performance of all required public improvement work is complete within a specified period of time. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Community Development) 18. RESOLUTION 17805 ADOPTING A 1995/96 LEGISLATlYE PROGRAM AND LEGISLATIYE WORK PROGRAM - The Legislative Program represents Council's consensus position on items likely to be acted upon by the State Legislature, Congress, or administrative agencies. By adopting a Legislative Program at the beginning of each two-year legislative session, the City can take a proactive role in sponsoring, supporting, or opposing bills related to various legislative priorities. Staff recommends approval of tbe resolution. (Assistant City Manager) 19. REPORT UPDATE ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ISSUES - An oral report will be given by staff. A. REPORT LANDFiLL DISPOSAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO - It is recommended that Council not approve the agreement but place it on hold to be reconsidered in tbe future sbould County landfill rates be increased. (Deputy City Manager Krempl) "--- ~.... - ._...__.._---~----~- ._-".-. Agenda -6- February 7, 1995 B. REPORT ONGOING STRATEGY WITH REGARD TO SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OPTIONS AND TRANSFER STATION - The purpose of the report is to review progress on tbe development of a solid waste transfer station, assess current options in light of recent events, and request further Council direction. The three options are: put all actions on hold indefinitely; continue with current plans for first phase of the transfer station (site, design and permitting only); or allow private contractor to proceed independently at this time. It is recommended tbat staff continue with current Council direction to site, design and permit a solid waste transfer station. Additionally, it is recommended that staff be directed to: (I) Monitor County progress towards reducing costs and landfill rates; (2) Pursue additional information on other viable alternatives such as a ·pod· truck system; and (3) Provide Council with a monthly written status report on expenditure obligations incurred as a result of the transfer station development. (Deputy City Manager Krempl and Principal Management Assistant Snyder) 20. REPORT UPDATE ON REGIONAL SEWER ISSUES· An oral report will be given by staff. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This Is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calend4r. Agend4 items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers. Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual. OTHER BUSINESS 21. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT IS) a. Scheduling of meetings. 22. MAYOR'S REPORTlS) a. Ratification of appointments: Design Review COIDDÙttee - Michael Spethman; Mobilehome Rent Review COIDDÙssion - Steve Epsten (Ex-Officio). b. Appointment of Council representative to the SANDAG Bayshore Bikeway Policy CoIDDÙttee. c. Appointment of Council representative to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Task Force (ADAPT). 23. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmemher Rindone a. Budget Process: (I) Eliminate practice of funding non-specific encumbrances from previous year's budget; and (2) Establisb procedures for authorizing expenditures from Mayor/Council annual budget. Continued from the meeting of 1/24/95. .--- -,---.---- - _........___._..__.__..~ ^"'._.__,_._'.______n_.. _.__.~._..._______. Agenda -7- February 7, 1995 CLOSED SESSION Unless the CiJy Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council wiU discuss and deliberate on the foUowing items of business which are pennitted by law to be the subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the interests of the CiJy. The CouncU is required by law to return to open session, issue any reporls of JiI1gJ action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be tenninated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session, reporls of JiI1gJ action taken, and at(joumment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office. 24. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING: 1. Existing litigation pursuant to Govermnent Code Section 54956.9 · Chula Vista and nine other cities vs. tbe County of San Diego regarding solid waste issues (trash litigation). · City of Cbula Vista vs. the County of San Diego regarding approval of a major use permit for Daley Rock Quarry. 2. Anticipated litigation pursuant to Govermnent Code Section 54956.9 · Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Govermnent Code Section 54957.6 · Agency negotiator: John Gass or designee for CVEA, WCE, Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. Employee organiution: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) and Western Council of Engineers (W CE). Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Govermnent Code Section 54956.8 · Property: 855 Maxwell Road, Chula Vista, CA (Parcel Number 644-040-16) or 894 Energy Way, Chula Vista, CA (Parcel Number 644-182-07 and 644-182-08). As and for transfer station. Negotiating parties: Director of Community Development. Under negotiations: Price and terms of payment. 25. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and tbence to) tbe Regular City Council Meeting on February 14, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council Meeting. -~-------~_.^ -.-- ._-_.._-_._---'"--~~ ________n_.__..___ _ __ _____________ u_______ .".__________.__.___n.___. _..~._--~----- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 7'tV Item Meeting Date Fe/' 7r.Þ , 95 ITEM TITLE: Proclamations honoring winners of "Voice of Democracy" contest SUBMITTED BY:~ ;ayor Jerry R. Rindone (4/5ths Vote: Yes___ No~) The following four 'students will be recognized for their winning speeches in the annual Voice of Democracy contest sponsored by the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Maureen DeRunt~, Mar vista High School Amanda Leming, Castle Park High School Wendy Paff, Bonita Vista High School Brian Sayers, Chula Vista High School . Form A-1l3 (Rev. 11/79) J-/¿¿ -' J /"¿¡({ - 2 ------.-"'----.---..-- --~-_.~.. ---~-_... - ..- COMMENDING MAUREEN DE RUNTZ UPON ACHIEVING THE "VOICE OF DEMOCRACY" FIRST PLACE AWARD IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, one of the basic aims of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, as set forth in its Congressional Charter, is 10 foster true patriotism'; and WHEREAS, tha Voice of Democracy Scholarship Program, sponsored by tha Veterans of Foreign Wars in the Unned States and its Ladies Auxiliary, has proven to be an affective instrument for putting these words in action; and WHEREAS, tha Voice of Democracy Scholarship Program provides an opportunity for high school students to think, write and speak up for our country and for freedom and damocracy in addition to increasing saW-confidence and poise, experience in communiceting with othars and valuable training in self expression; and WHEREAS, Maureen De Runtz, of Mar Vista High School, participated wnh 93 contestants from the 10th, 11 th and 12th grades, taking first place during the competition which consisted of writing and taping a 3-5 minute broadcast script et the Vetarans of Foreign Wars, Post #2111, in Chula Vista; NOW, THEREFORE, I, SHIRLEY HORTON, Mayor of the City of Chula Vi9la, Calnomia, do hareby COMMEND MAUREEEN DE RUNTZ, upon achieving the Voice of Democracy I'lr.' Place Award and for Instilling prida In good citizenship. FURTHER, I urge all our citizens to ancourage and support our ambitious young peopla to speak up for our country, for freedom and for damocracy. :Dater! tkisJ!:...cfry ~ Fd>rv.arJ 19 Q5 . ~1IJ~ UJt~or :.fe Ct!J?f aura %sta 14 -3 --.-.--------- "____" -"..--,-....--- ---~._~--- - _._.._._._--------~_.._--~_.,.._--------~---- COMMENDING AMANDA LEMING UPON ACHIEVING THE 'VOICE OF DEMOCRACY' FIRST PLACE AWARD IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, one of the basic aims of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, as set forth In Its Congressional Charter, Is 'to foster true patriotism'; and WHEREAS, the Voice of Democracy Scholarship Program, sponsored by the Veterans of Foreign Wars in tha United States and ns Ladies Auxiliary, has proven to be an effactive instrument for putting these words in action; and WHEREAS, the Voice of Democracy Scholarship Program provides an opportunity for high school students to think, write and speak up for our country and for freedom and democracy in addition to increasing self-confidence and poise, experience in communicating with others and valuable training In salf expression; and WHEREAS, Amanda Leming, of Castle Park High School, participated wnh 93 contestants from the 10th, 11 th and 12th grades, taking first place during the competition which consisted of writing and taping a 3-5 minute broadcast script at the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post #2111, in Chula Vim; NOW, THEREFORE, I, SHIRLEY HORTON, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby COMMEND AMANDA LEMING, upon achieving the VoIce of Oemocrllcy First Place Award and for instilling pride In good citizenship. FURTHER, I urge all our cnizens to encourage and support our ambitious young people to speak up for our country, for freedom and for' democracy. :Dateá this 7th r.fry !!f Fe.bruDAj 19 9õ #J~ UJt~or tlie Ctlf?f aura o/i.5ta ~a-i ..----.~--,-_._._--~_._._._._-_.._..- --.----..- _.....__...____... . _..__.__.___._._..___.._.___~_._...,_..__~_m____~'__ tiOll~ COMMENDING WENDY PAFF UPON ACHIEVING THE 'VOICE OF DEMOCRACY" FIRST PLACE AWARD IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, one of the basic aims of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, as set forth in its Congressional Charter, is 'to foster true patriotism'; and WHEREAS, tha Voice of Democracy Scholarship Program, sponsored by the Veterans of Foreign Wars in the Unned Sletes and its Ladies Auxiliary, has proven to be an effactive instrument for pulling these words in action; and WHEREAS, the Voice of Democracy Scholarship Program provides an opportunity for high school students to think, write and speak up for our counlly and for freedom and democracy in addition to increasing se~-confidence and poise, experience in communicating with others and valuable training in sa~ axpression; and WHEREAS, Wendy Pall, of Bonita Vista High School, participated with 93 contestants from the 10111, 11 th and 12th grades, taking first place during the competition which consisted of writing and taping a 3-5 minute broadcast script at the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post #2111, in Chula Vista: NOW, THEREFORE, I, SHIRLEY HORTON, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista, California, do haraby COMMEND WENDY PAFF, upon achieving the Voice of Democracy First Place Award and for instilling pride in good cilizanship. FURTHER, I urge all our citizens to encouraga and support our ambitious young people to speak up for our counlly, for freedom and for democracy. ,Ðaterf Mis 7"" rf'YI !fFebrtlt1':}1 19 95 ~.:/~ UJt~or tÆè C'!!!f aUra 'ViSta ?,ec: -f ---'-'~--'"-----'--'-'--"-"-'---'---"'--"'.__.~---"--~._,-- - .--.---- --- _._~-_._._-----~-- -- - -~~-"---- .,.-.--- COMMENDING BRIAN SAYERS UPON ACHIEVING THE 'VOICE OF DEMOCRACY" FIRST PLACE AWARD IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, one of the basic aims of tha Veterans of Foreign Wars, as set forth In its Congressional Charter, Is 'to fostar true patriotism'; and WHEREAS, the Voice of Democracy Scholarship Program, sponsored by the Veterans of Foraign Wars in the United States and its ladles Auxiliary, has proven to be an effective instrument for putting these words in action; and WHEREAS, tha Voice of Democracy Scholarship Program provides an opportunity for high school studenls to think, write and speak up for our country and for fraadom and democracy in addition to increasing salf-confidence and poise, experience in communicating with others and valuable training in sen expression; and WHEREAS, Brian Sayers, of Chula Vista High School, participated with 93 contestan,ls from the 10th, 11th and 12th grades, taking first place during the compatition which consisted of writing and taping a 3-5 minute broadcast script at the Vetarans of Foreign Wars, Post #2111, in Chula Vista: NOW, THEREFORE, I, !SHIRLEY HORTON, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby COMMEND BRIAN SAYERS, upon achieving the Voice of Democracy First Place Award and for instilling pride In good citizanship. FURTHER, I urga all our citizens to ancourage and support our ambitious young people to speak up for our country, for fraadom and for democracy. :Dater! this 7f1' át! Jf FebrUO/,j 19 's ..JMh't!-k£ UJtttY0r!!f e Off !f aura o/t:5ta ~a. - ¿, - -I" - I PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 5 THROUGH FEBRUARY 11,1995 AS SOUTH BAY ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS WEEK IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CAUFORNIA WHEREAS, the County of San Diego has a varied coas1Ilne of sandy beaches, rocky shores, productive estuaries, marshes and tidal flats, urban areas and harbors; and WHEREAS, the City of Chuta Vista Is strongly committed to wise management of thesa resourcæ by "Forging the Chain of environmental Awareness" to promote: A better understanding and awareness of the ecology and environment; A breed base of public support and educetion; Cooperation among ecology-oriented organizations and agencies; Increased understanding of the history and ecotogy of the land and ocean;and Building a working coalition that will move beyond public awareness Into action programs; and, WHEREAS, protacting the environment Is a duty shared by Individual citizens, the business community and public Institutions: NOW, THEREFORE, I, SHIRLEY HORTON, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista, Cal~omla do hereby proclalmthe week of February 5,through February 11, 1995 as SOUTH BAY ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS WEEK and February 11, as ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS DAY. Chuta Vista Invites tha public to attend a special event on Saturday from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. at Chura Vista Harbor and commends the citizens. Tall Ship Society of San Diego County and the Nautical Heritaga Society for their efforts in joining together In efforts to promote environmental awareness. :Dated' t£is~rfry ?í- FebruDf} 1995 ~~/ ûJt~or í'Aè ('If 5' C£táa o/t5ta ~C-J --..."--~--_._----- "".--._~___. ______··____···_n -----__"-'0',_...- ._~__ ····__·___·.··n_ ____ . ...____ ____...___._._. February 2, 1995 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City coun~ FROM: John D. Goss, City Manager~ ~ :.....---- SUBJECT: City Council Meeting of February 7, 1995 This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting of Tuesday, February 7,1995. Comments regarding the Written Communications are as follows: Sa. This is a letter from the City Attoruey stating that there were no observed reportable actions taken from the Closed Session of 1/24/95. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED. Sh. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT NICHOLAS AGUILAR'S RESIGNATION FROM THE VETERANS ADVISORY COMMISSION BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET AND THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED TO POST IMMEDIATELY ACCORDING TO THE MADDY ACT IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND TIlE PUBLIC LmRARY. Sc. This is a request from Larissa Martinez for ("mancial support in sponsoring attendance at the 1994 Youth Leadership Conference at Freedoms Foundation, Valley Forge, Pennsylvania. On January 25, 1994, Council granted $700, to be divided between seven students from the Chula Vista area, to attend last year's Youth Leadership Conference. The funding was granted with the understanding that in exchange for the funds, each ofthe seven students would make a presentation of their experiences at the Conference to a community or youth group. Staff indicates that the presentations made by the students were very impressive and well received. Based on Council's past practice with respect to funding requests for this purpose and on the criteria set forth in Council Policy 159-02, "Funding Private Organizations or Individuals", IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT $100 OF TIlE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT BE GRANTED TO MS. MARTINEZ WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IN EXCHANGE FOR RECEIVING TIlE FUNDS SHE WILL MAKE PRESENTATIONS TO TWO OF THE CITY'S YOUTH OR COMMUNITY GROUPS. This recommended level of support ($100) is based . on the amount granted per student in 1994. - ------_...~-"...."~._.----_._---~-_. "-_.,-",- ---.------.- ~__ ._._____._._________._~".___.__._ __ - - _0 ~____,__ · Sd. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT CHARLES SUTHERLAND'S RESIGNATION FROM THE ECONOMIC DEVEWPMENT COMMISSION BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET AND THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED TO POST IMMEDIATELY ACCORDING TO THE MADDY ACT IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND THE PUBLIC LmRARY. Se. This is a letter from a group of concerned citizens regarding smoking in bingo haIls. Currently, under State law, bingo haIls are exempt from the prohibition of smoking in public buildings. However, state law holds that local governments may regulate smoking in those locations where there are no state restrictions, and local government also bas the right to impose stricter regulations than tbe state where smoking is regulated. H the Council so desires, as a matter of policy, to prohibit smoking in bingo haIls, the City can do so via adoption of an ordinance. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT, AS AN INTERIM MEASURE, STAFF BE DIRECTED TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS BINGO HALLS IN THE CITY ENCOURAGING THAT THEY TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE CONCERNS OF NON- SMOKERS USING THEm FACILITIES BY VOLUNTARILY PROVIDING BETTER VENTILATED AND SEPARATE AREAS FOR THEm NON-SMOKING CLIENTELE. FURTHER, THAT STAFF MEET WITH THE BINGO HALL OPERATORS TO RECEIvE THEm INPUT BEFORE BRINGING BACK AN ORDINANCE PROHmITING SMOKING IN BINGO HALLS. JDG:mab -~.,._,~-~---_.__._-- _._......_..._-~~---------- ... __^__._.,___ _.....____...~. __ ______'_n___._._._.___ _.. ________.________~._ ~~f? =~~ ;..,..;:-..::.....-:~ ~~~~ ellY OF CHULA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Date: January 31, 1995 To: The Honorable Mayor and city coun~ From: Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney Re: Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session for the Meeting of 1/24/95 The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of my knowledge from observance of actions taken in the Closed Session, that there were no actions taken in the Closed Session of 1/24/95 which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. BMB:lgk C:\lt\closses8.no ~-J 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5037 ."--"-_._. .-.--... UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO I , , BERKELEY' DAVIS' IRVINE' LOS Az.;'GELES . RIVERSIDE . SA~ DIEGO' SAS FRANCISCO SA1'o."TA BARBARA' SA!\"TA CRUZ DIRECTOR'S OFFICE (619) 534·6225 SPECIAL SERVICES CENTER LA JOLLA. CALIFORNIA 92093 STUDENT CENTER COMPLEX, B-009 January 18, 1995 Mr. Agustive Hermes Jr. §ê ~ ::u Chair (':>0 . 'II r"" 0 Veterans Advisory Commission mC') ::IO::r; - 'II City of Chula Vista :>':c:: Q) - <fir < 0» -0 'II Resignation from the Veterans Advisory Commission ..,,<: Þo C Re: "T}- ~ Ä ",~ - .- Dear Gus, ~ I regret to inform you that I will be unable to continue as an active member of the Veterans Advisory Commission, and I am hereby submitting my resignation effective immediately. I enjoyed my brief, but very meaningful association with the Commission members, and I know you all will continue to serve as very effective advocates for veterans living in Chula Vista and the entire South Bay area. Thank you very much for the warm and collegial association you extended to me. I Sincerely yours, - ~ Nicholas S, Aguilar cc: Clerk, City of Chula Vista ~¡7:ì¡(;)TTEN "'OMMUNiCA T~O~'S I CC" ~ ~ ~)II ." /~/;;7;~ cz: /~ 'D~7 7@~/ , ~~-/ ..._.,..-...,-,"",-.,-.,,---...-.,--~.--- --------.~------ I "--"- .~ " J~ .--, ~ ~:;.~ )J j¡ Ii ~,L..i&. j) t)'j:: (~ II u) r --"""-",..,"-'..., rg¡, I'" I n \1 I:::' ~,,' tl RECEIVED ¡uu¡ .~N I: [0<1;.. i!~!! ~'!'::;";.:;;C:06J J \ )\. 15 .,3 P4 :04 CI.;::." \ "~\'ii'): i·.~(~ ~/ "\ ,( ~ [ CHULA v~tt ¿499 ûolfc~est LoaD . EftK'S OF Chula Vista. CA 91915 '''anuarv 9, 1995 City of Chula Vista C/O Shirley Horton 276 4th Ave. Chula Vista. CA 91910 Dear IItrs, Horton, I am one of thirtv-six high school students recently selected to attend the 1994 Youth Leadersh;c Conference at Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge, Penn!:"....lvanï.... As you know because of your sponsorship last year, freedoms Foundation is a patriotic nationill orqan;1.ation devoted to educating Americans about the freedoms that they en.iav. The purpose of this c;onferer-,ce is to Drovide a s[lBcial opnort:l1nitv for high school students to 1 ear'n more about the hist,orlf of our country and to gain a QrBater- aopr-eciation ()f our democratic system, The confer'anceon the Valley Forge campus 11i11 include meetings ~~ith orominent histor'ians, educators. journalists. and econom; st$, There ~Ii 11 iillso be tours of Valley Forge National Park and Mstoric Phi ladeloh'ia. He ¡vi11 travel to Washinqton. D.C.. to meet legislators and visit important national historic sitss. I am a .lImier at Eastlake High School. t,ty school activitîes include: CSF(California Scholarship Feder'ation\ secretar'v, Varsitv cheer'leader. member" of the peD club. Dance Club member.varsity golf team member' , and Senator. I also participate as a volunteer in many community events. I am currently enrolled in many honors classes. and have a 4,1 GPA. The San Diego County Chapter of Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge organ i z.as. sponsors, and underwrites a significant portion of the costs of this trip. We students are asked to find financial sponsors within our community who support youth programs. I need to raise $500 as soon as possible. .ty trip is the week of March 23-29. I hope that you will consider helping me achieve this goal. To show my appreciat10n for your sponsorship, I would be more than happy to provide a program on the conference and Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge for one of your gatherings. Please call me at 482-4271 or Marcelite Penhune if you need more information. Checks should be made out to FFVF San Diego cO\.iI1ty Chapter and be mailed to Mrs. Penhune at the address given below. Please include .y rnme with it:. Thank you in advance for considering sponsoring me on this wonderful opportunity for youth. THIS DOUATIOtl 18 TAX DEOlJCTIRLE 5i nr.er"e 1 y , ~CVL. ~ 0: VjA/\.-tT;yl./.Ya--' Larissa Martinez ~arcelite Penhune Vice-president, Youth Programs 6730 MuirlAnds Drive La ,Jolla. CA 92073 (619) 459-7402 W"TTEN f~ ";'r-/'I) COMMUNICATIONS Cé~ /t/0 ~~[< ~ ;¡7-~< ~ -/ r64::r J-;1~ ..., ...,,"_._-",- 1891 Ni-fvana Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91911 (619) 421-1151 Mailing address: p.o.A£¡Qi,I~ED, CA 91908-1109. FAX (619) 421-1506 ¡--,.. ",'-' - .. . .-... '9S .. 27 Al1:1 1 : ' ·:i'" ctnOf CHULA VIST~ )"1 171:-"'- January 12, 1995 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (. -.... ""I ."J ¡ .. I L_.",,'~:..J l,¡" ,~.J C ':.____ '.-~ Patty Davis, Chair Economic Development Commission City of Chula Vista Dear Patty, Pursuant to our recent phone conversation I am submitting my resignation as an ex-officio member of the Chula Vista Economic Development Commission in writing. Unfortunately I have suffered a physical trauma that has impaired my ability to communicate effectively. Until such time this situation is remedied, I feel that I would be ineffective as a member of the commission. I have enjoyed my association with the commission and wish all of you continued success in your endeavors. Very Truly Yours, CES/aw cc: Mayor Horton COMMUNICATIONS Cc:C ~ cj/~f ('""7 ì ' L../'-"'1. . 5¿f-/ - -- -_._- . - _.-_...' ..,-_._-_._....---_.._~_.- ¡rn~~~~,·:··- ~~-Hr lIl1 j JANI ;:= ! ~ ell ¡, ',11',~ ~~~~ January 12, 1995 c~ "'~ ~H~(~·i'I" 1;\,\ Mayor and City Council ~ ðI ::D City of Chula Vista µ~ II '" 176 Fourth Avenue me-.> C) Chula Vista, California 91910 :::C::z:: kJ r'1 ~c: - v>r- < 0'" :;¡~ :Þ '" RE: ASSEMBLY BILL 13 - (FRIEDMAN) '0 0 ~~ (;.¡ w Dear Council Members: _. Attached is a list of signatures representing just a handful of péople intrested in seeing that the captioned law is carried out in Chula Vista Bingo halls. It is our very strong feeling that since this "State Law" has been passed, it should be carried out in every city in the State. We are aware that Bingo halls are exempt from adhering to the prohibition of smoking in public buildings; however, in light of all the facts being supplied to the public on how DEADLY second hand smoke is, this exemption makes absolutely NO sense whatsoever, We believe that if a visit was made to a Bingo hall in Chula Vista (durng a Bingo game)¡ it would be quite clear why we are so concerned. One location to visit is the Church of the Most Precious Blood on Fourth Avenue or the Chula Vista Boys and Girls Club on Oleander Avenue. One of these establishments has a very small closed-in room for the non-smokers. Of course this is inadequate for the number of non- smokers. The rest of us are subjected to very heavy smoke inhalation. The other establishment, though it is quite a large room, has absolutely no closed-in area for non-smokers. In our research on Assembly Bill 13, we have been informed that each City has the authority to enact more stringent measures to put Assembly Bill 13 into action. Therefore, we would request that you adopt suitable measures to insure a more healthful environment for everyone. Sincerely yours, ... See list attached. f, "F~~JT"EN COA\í\\UNICA T;Or~S '" ", C. ," " i' ". ~ 1:j5~ ¿,- 5e~1 -_.._._..~_. --.-.-. "--,~~_...- ·.,..-.,.-.. J r ' ./ -ru (Gl ¿U\.--i e ALL L J',I-'''',YJ./ C ',?C'-l ,I: //L " /, / .- L- ~_ (-- >/ ~'i_> L---'-' ~ ' d/"\.; /' J(¿L t<- f//£> 'ç. . !I>~' /i¡" ( C ') I ¡'···I)... '. /,./' .. .1...----i/L- A:..(.. ,- - ...... /..- - . .·t / ,,/.. I-,~ ---.- ..//./ ,.Á'- " L2 k' '.' / / ¡; ;/ C þ// -/,.- ;2'>;7' ../,',~"."". . / /. 'l' //! ') , /,;"-,-,,.·/"·I/I-''-f:;:,'' ( -::./ ~:ú·' .... -G A>?L<:.. /:7 //' 5e -d.-. .....-..-...--.-,--...- ~' ~C'OIVD 1Y1:'j¡ ORDINANCE NO. 2621 D/I\IG' "1 I\ID "1DoI> ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA ~OIV VISTA CREATING A HIGH TECH/BIO TECH ZONE, CREATING A SUBCOMMITTEE TO GOVERN CERTAIN MATTERS WITHIN THE HIGH TECH/BIO TECH ZONE OF THE CITY, AND DELEGATING CERTAIN AUTHORITY TO SAID SUBCOMMITTEE WHEREAS, in order to attract certain targeted High Technology, Bio Technical and Bio Medical businesses and promote economic development in the City, the City desires to form, for economic incentive purposes (not in the planning/entitlement context). a High Tech/Bio Tech Zone ("Zone") in the territory of the EastLake Business Center of the City, diagrammatically represented on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by this reference; and, WHEREAS, currently, as to property located within the Zone ("Zone Properties") and elsewhere within the City, the Planning Commission and Design Review Committee has certain authority to make certain discretionary approvals or recommendations to the Council for approval ("Planning and Design Authority") over land use; and, WHEREAS, the City hereby intends to form a subcommittee of the City Council consisting of two councilpersons to take certain discretionary actions within the territory of the Zone ("High Tech/Bio Tech Subcommittee" or "Subcommittee") and re-delegate Planning and Design Authority currently vested in the Planning Commission and the Design Review Committee of the City to the Subcommittee as to all Zone Properties; and, WHEREAS, on December 21,1994, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the proposal in accordance with Resolution PCM-95-06; and, WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing, and notice of said hearing together with its purpose was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 21 days prior to the hearing; and, WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely on January 24, 1995, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby ordain, find, declare, order and resolve as follows: SECTION I. Create High Tech/Bio Tech Zone. There hereby exists an area of the City of Chula Vista ("Zone") the territory of which is shown in Exhibit A, inclusive of the EastLake Business Center ("Center"), both Phase I ("Phase I Center") and Phase II ("Phase II Center"). which Zone may be expanded from time to time by the City Council by written ordinance, in their sole discretion, and when so amended shall be included in the meaning of the term Zone as used herein. ~/I" I -.-.---....---. _._----~-_. Ordinance No. 2621 Page 2 SECTION II. Create High Tech/Bio Tech Subcommittee. A High Tech/Bio Tech Subcommittee ("Subcommittee") is hereby declared to exist consisting of a permanent member being the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista and another member of the City Council that would rotate on a yearly basis, to rotate off not in the middle of any particular project and the third member would be the chair of the Chula Vista Planning Commission. The Subcommittee shall operate in all respects in the manner required by law, including the provisions of the Brown Act, and in that regard shall be deemed to be a standing subcommittee of the Council and shall conduct the meetings of their members in an open manner and pursuant to a posted agenda describing in legal detail the subject matter of their deliberations. SECTION III. Delegation of Authority to the Subcommittee. Subcommittee is hereby vested with the following authorities: A. Planning Commission Authority. All matters which are otherwise vested in the Planning Commission of the City by virtue of the Zoning Chapter of the Municipal Code or any Planned Community District Regulations or other rules of regulations adopted thereunder ("Planning Commission Matters" ) are hereby redelegated to the Subcommittee for applications for entitlement affecting Zone Properties exclusively wherein the application for entitlement indicates that the Zone Property is intended to, designed and planned to be put to a High Technology, Bio-Technical or Bio-Medical use as defined in Section IV.1 of the Eastlake Planned Community District Regulations. B. Design Review Authority. All matters which are otherwise vested in the Design Review Committee of the City by virtue of the Zoning Chapter of the Municipal Code or any Planned Community District Regulations or other rules of regulations adopted thereunder ("Design Review Matters") are hereby redelegated to the Subcommittee for applications for entitlement affecting Zone Properties wherein the application for entitlement indicates that the Zone Property is intended to, designed and planned to be put to a High Technology, Bio-Technical or Bio-Medical use as defined in Section IV.1 of the Eastlake Planned Community District Regulations. C. Economic Development Agreement Authority. Except as to matters other than legislative matters required to be vested in the City Council, all matters related to determining eligibility for and recommended level of economic support as permitted or required by one or more agreements between the Eastlake Development Company and the City of Chula Vista and/or by City policy. SECTION IV. Exercise of Authority by Subcommittee Not Mandatory. The Subcommittee is not obligated to use the authority regarding Planning Commission Matters or Design Review Matters, and if it surrenders or refuses to exercise same in gross ¿,,1' .;2 ..- --...-...-..,.-.------...- Ordinance No. 2621 Page 3 or as to a specific application, the authority to decide such Matters reverts back to the bOdy from which it was originally delegated. SECTION V. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Presented by Robert A. Leiter Chris Salomone Planning Director Community Development Director Approved as to form by Bruce M. Boogaard City Attorney ¿,/l :J ----_._---._.,-~--_.__._-_. -,- .--- ..._-~_...------ "4__ ___ __ .~,.... SEco 'l'vD Iì'. ORDINANCE NO. -< ~';¿::J- 'f:A.D/f\!Q A.t1?) , .<1 Dopl'¡, 0", AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EAST LAKE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON IS-95-11 I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the properties which are the subject matter of this ordinance are diagrammatically represented on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, and located within the EastLake I Planned Community Area of the City of Chula Vista ("Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on September 29, 1994, the City of Chula Vista filed an application proposing amendments to the EastLake Planned Community District Regulations (known as Document No. CO 95- _ on file with the Office of the City Clerk) Section IV.O, IV.1, IV.3, and IX.1 in order to encourage the location of certain qualified high technology, bio technical and bio medical uses within the EastLake Business Center ("Project"). C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the Project Site has been in part the subject matter of a Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan previously approved by City Council and most recently amended by Resolution No. 16702 ("EastLake I SPA Plan") on June 30, 1992, and Planned Community (P.C.) District Regulations previously approved by City Council and recently amended by Ordinance No. 2600 and 2601 (EastLake Planned Community District Regulations) on August 16, 1994. D. Planning Commission Record on Applications WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said project on December 21, 1994, and voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council approve the Planned Community District Regulation amendments in accordance with the findings listed below. ~ &13-( -.--- ..---....- ...--.-.---..--...----.-- The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on this Project held on December 21, 1994, and the minutes and draft ordinances resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. E. City Council Record on Applications WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 24, 1995, on the Discretionary Approval Application, and to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and, F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution and Ordinance WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting at which this ordinance was introduced for fIrst reading (January 24, 1995), the City Council of the City of Chula Vista introduced for first reading Ordinance No. by which it approved the establishment of a High Tech/Bio Tech Zone and a High- Tech/Bio Tech Subcommittee. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: II. NEGATIVE DECLARATION REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED; FINDINGS; APPROVALS A. Negative Declaration The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has reviewed, analyzed and considered Negative Declaration IS-95-11 (known as Document No. CO 95- _ on file in tlu: Office of the City Clerk), the environmental impacts therein identified for this project prior to approving the Project. Based on the Initial Study and comments thereon, the Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment and thereby approves the Negative Declaration. -2- ~ ~B- .2 "---.--,-., _._'.m___~~__,_ III. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council does hereby find that the Negative Declaration on IS-95-11 have been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista. IV. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL The City Council finds that the Negative Declaration on IS-95-11 reflect the independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista City Council. V. FINDINGS FOR P-C PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE AMENDMENTS The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendments to the EastLake Planned Community District Regulations are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and public necessity, convenience, the general welfare, and good zoning practice support the amendments. VI. APPROVAL OF P-C PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE AMENDMENTS The City Council hereby approves the project and thereby amends Section IV.a, Section IV.l, Section IV. 3 and Section IX.l of the EastLake Planned Community District Regulations to read as follows: (A.) SECTION IV: BUSINESS CENTER DISTRICTS IV. PURPOSE In addition to the objectives outlined in Section I. a (Purpose and Scope), the Business Center Districts are included to provide for a quality working environment and to achieve a harmonious mixture of uses which might otherwise be considered incompatible when located in close proximity. Activities are intended to promote employment opportunities in manufacturing, service, research and development, engineering and wholesale trade. In addition, the Business Center Districts are included to advance the following objectives: To reserve appropriately located areas for industrial use and protect these areas from intrusion by dwellings and other' non-harmonious uses; -3- 3IÞ;J tß-3 -- .....-----~.~------""_.._.~----~ ,- To protect residential and commercial uses from noise, odor, dust, smoke, light intrusion, truck traffic and other objectionable influences and to prevent fire, explosion, radiation and other hazards incidental to certain industrial activities; To promote sufficient open space around industrial structures to protect them from hazard and. to minimize the impact of industrial operations on nearby residential or commercial districts; and To minimize traffic congestion and avoid overloading utilities by restricting construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the amount of land around them. A. Business Center Manufacturing Park District (BC-l) This district is intended as an area for modem industrial, research, and administrative facilities which can meet high performance and development standards. B. ' Business Center Manufacturing Service District (BC-2) This district is intended as an area for light industrial and limited service commercial uses which can meet high performance and development standards. The Business Center District areas (BC-l and BC-2) of the EastLake Business Center have been included and constitute a portion of the High Tech/Bio Tech Zone, an area of the City of Chula Vista the territory of which is shown on Exhibit C, within which certain qualifying high technology, bio technical and bio medical uses are encouraged to locate by providing to those businesses economic and land use processing incentives. (B.) IV.I Permitted and Conditional Uses: Business Center Districts The following uses shall be permitted uses where the symbol "P" appears and shall be permitted uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit where the symbol "C" appears. Uses where the symbol "A" appears shall be subject to an Administrative Review. -4- ~lJß-~ --------..........- --- -- ---."-- ~.._-_..._...._,--...- - --~_._.__.-- Land Use GrouD Land Use BC-I BC-2 (Manufacturing (Manufacturing Park) Service) A. Manufacturing 1. Manufacturing, compounding, assembly or treatment of articles or merchandise from the following previously prepared typical materials such as canvas, cellophane, cloth, cork, felt, fiber, fur, glass, leather, paper (no milling), precious or semi- precious stones or metals, plaster, plastics, shells, textiles, tobacco, wood, and yams; novelty items (not including fireworks or explosive type items). P P 2. Electrical and related parts; electrical appliances, motors and devices; radio, television, phonograph and computers; electronic precision instruments; timing and measuring instruments; audio machinery; visual machinery, cosmetics, drugs, perfumes, toiletries and soap (not including refining or rendering of fat or P P oils) 3. Furniture and upholstering P C 4. Rubber and metal stamp manufacturing P C 5. Laboratories; chemical P P 6. Laboratories; dental, electrical, optical, mechanical and medical P P 7. Bottling plants P P 8. Cement products manufacturing C 9. Pharmaceuticals; laboratories and manufacturing P P -5- ~ Leß-S _.__."_._-~" -"..-----.---------- .---.-------- Land Use GrOUD Land Use BC-l BC-2 (Manufacturing (Manufacturing Park) Service) B. Storage and Wholesale Trades 1. Mini-storage, public storage and storage warehouses C P 2. Moving and storage firms C P 3. Building materials and lumber storage yards and/or contractors' yards C 4. Building equipment storage, sales, rentals C 5. Automobiles fleet storage C C 6. Trailer, truck, or bus terminal C C C. Services 1. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic and/or office P P 2. Automobile and/or truck services including but not limited to: sales, rental agencies, body repair, painting and car washes C 3. Blueprinting and photocopying P P 4. Cleaning and dyeing plant C 5. Distributors, showrooms and automobile P P offices -6- ~ Vß-Cp -------.-.".". --~.~-- .-- Land Use GrOUD Land Use BC-l BC-2 (Manufacturing (Manufacturing Park) Service) 6. Eating and drinking establishments: a. Bars C C b. Restaurants, coffee shops, delicatessens: 1. With alcoholic beverages C C 2. Without alcoholic beverages A A c. Snack bars, take-out only; refreshments stand within a building P P d. Fast food restaurants with drive-in or C C drive-through 7. Furniture sales, new and used (no outdoor sales or display) P p 8. Gasoline dispensing and/or automobile service station C C 9. Kennels C 10. Heliports C C 11. Motels, hotels and convention centers C C 12. Newspaper publishing, printing, and distribution, general printing and lithography p p 13. Offices, business, medical, professional, real estate and research P p 14. Retail commercial when in conjunction with a permitted or conditional use P p -7- ~ lQÒ-7 ----------...---..--- ---. Land Use GrouD Land Use BC-l BC-2 (Manufacturing (Manufacturing Park) Service) D. High-Technology Uses 1. Research, development and manufacturing of advanced technology products (such as but not limited to systems, subsystems, components, peripherals and accessories), inclusive of prototype and experimental products, utilized in the fields of aerospace, avionics, computers, electronics, advanced materials, defense industries, communications, energy and environmental systems, transportation, telecommunications, optics/laser, fiberoptics, optoelectrics, video, imaging, P P magnetics, oceanography and other related fields. E. Bio- Technical Uses 1. Research, development and manufacturing of health care, food safety, nutrition, agriculture productivity and industrial and environmental improvement products, inclusive of prototype and experimental products involving use of organic, P P chemical, and biologic processes. F. Bio-Medical Uses 1. Research, development and manufacturing of inorganic and organic drug delivery systems and diagnostic and therapeutic products. inclusive of prototype and experimental products, utilized in the field P p of medical health care. -8- ~ (g~-~ ._----~~_._----~_._._-- ---- Land Use GrouD Land Use BC-l BC-2 (Manufacturing (Manufacturing Park) Service) G. Public and Semi-Public Uses 1. Day nurseries, day care schools and nursery schools A A 2. Post offices and post office tenninals A C 3. Public utility pumping stations, equipment building and installation A A 4. Public utility service yards C 5. Educational institutions, public or private including vocational schools C C H. Accessory Uses 1. Accessory structures and uses located on the same lot as pennitted or conditional use p p 2. Incidental services for employees on a site occupied by a pennitted or conditional use, including day care, recreational facilities, showers and locker rooms p p 3. Watchmen's or caretaker's living quarters only when incidental to and on the same site as a pennitted or conditional use A A I. Temporary Uses 1. Temporary uses as prescribed in VI.o P P -9- ~ (O~~q ~,.._--- (C.) 1V.3 Performance Standards: Business Center Districts A. In all Business Center Districts the required setbacks shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall consist predominately of plant materials and shall be irrigated by automatic sprinklers. All planting and irrigation shall be in accordance with the City's Landscape Manual. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained in a clean thriving condition, free of weeds, trash and debris. B. All ground mounted mechanical equipment, including heating and air conditioning units and trash receptacle areas, shall be completely screened from surrounding properties by use of a parapet, wall or fence, or shall be enclosed within a building. Exposed gutters, downspout, vents, louvers and other similar elements shall be painted to match the surface to which they are attached unless they are used as part of the design theme. C. All utility connections shall be designed to coordinate with the architectural elements of the site so as not to be exposed except where required by utility provider. Pad-mounted transformers and/or meter box locations shall be included in the site plan with an appropriate screening treatment. D. Lighting. All light sources shall be shielded in such a manner that the light is directed away from the streets and adjoining properties. Illuminators shall be integrated within the architecture of the building. The intensity of the light at the boundary of any Business Center District shall not exceed seventy-five (75) foot lamberts from a source of reflected light. E. Electrical Disturbance, Heat and Cold, Glare. No use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which creates changes in temperature or direct glare, detectable by the human senses without the aid of instruments, beyond the boundaries of the site. No use shall be permitted which created electrical disturbances that affect the operation of any equipment beyond the boundary of site. F. Fire and Explosive Hazard. All uses involving inflammable and explosive materials shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with all applicable State regulations contained in the California Code of Regulations and the Uniform Fire Code. G. Noise. The acceptable outdoor noise exposure levels, measured at the property line, for the Business Center districts are given in the table below. (See amended Chapter 19.66 CVMC for definitions and additional details.) -10- ~ EA í3 ->10 .._---_._-------_.~---~~----- Exterior Noise Limits* Receiving Land Use District 7 a.m. - 10 p.m. 10 p.m. - 7 a.m. BC-I, BC-2 70- dbA 70 dbA *Environmental Noise-Leq in any hour *Nuisance Noise - Not exceeded at any time H. Odor. Any use involving the creation or emission of odorous gases or other odorous matter shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with all applicable County regulations including but not limited to Rule 51 of the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) regulations. I. Radioactivity. Any use involving radioactive materials shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with all applicable State regulations including but not limited to Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations and the Uniform Fire Code. J. Vibration. No use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which generated inherent and recurrent ground vibration perceptible, without instruments, at the boundary of the lot on which the use is located. K. In any Business Center District, the conversion of a project to condominium ownership shall meet all the requirements of the zone to the maximum extent possible. Specific City Council waiver shall be required where the zone requirements cannot be met. L. Air Pollution. Emission of air contaminants shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with all applicable County regulations including but not limited to Rule 50 of the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) regulations. M. Outdoor Storage Areas shall be entirely enclosed by solid walls not less than eight (8) feet in height to adequately screen views from the external boundaries of the property. N. Energy Conservation. All uses shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. O. Toxic Materials. Any use involving hazardous materials shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with all applicable State regulations including but not limited to those contained in the California Code of Regulations, State Health and Safety Codes and the Uniform Fire Code. -11- ~ føG -f/ ._--_.~----_.- P. Liquid or Solid Waste. The discharge of deposit of liquid or solid wastes shall be subject to the provisions of Section 19.66.150 CYMC. NOTE: With the exceplion of the Unifonn Building Code and Unifonn Fire Code, the above referenced State and County regulations shall not be administered by City departments/agencies. (D.) SECTION IX: ADMINISTRATION IX.l Standard Procedures A. General: The Administralive Procedures, Conditional Uses, and Variances, Chapter 19.14 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, shall be utilized as applicable to the administration of the Planned Community of EastLake I. B. High Tech/Bio Tech Zone: Not withstanding the above provision, the High Tech/Bio Tech Subcommittee shall act in place of the Planning Commission and Design Review Committee on discretionary applications for high technology, bio technical and bio medical projects located within the High Tech/Bio Tech Zone, as described and established by Ordinance No. , in accordance with the authority vested in the High Tech/Bio Tech Subcommittee by said Ordinance. C. Sectional Planning Areas (SPA) and Sectional Planning Areas Plans (SPA Plans). The administration of SPA Plans shall be as provided for in Section 19.48.090 through Section 19.48.130 inclusive of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, except that the Director of Planning may accept less detail or require additional detail to suit the scope of the SPA. VII. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of Determination and file the same with the County Clerk. VIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that adoption of this Ordinance is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more tenns, provisions or conditions are detennined by a -12- ?ß<l!-' ðJß -11- ,~-,,_."""""-"----~'-'-~~--'-~'~-'--' _._------~ Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. IX. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by by .» Robert A. Leiter Bruce M. Boogaard Director of Planning City Attorney (m:\... \amyw\ELIpcreg.ord) -l~ ~ß~\3 ~._--~._-_._----.._--_._-.._.- II' ': ..I.' " - > . Š 1__, ...-... c..,n.a.. n~ ""- LOCATOR HIGH TECH I 810 TECH ZONE C) EXHIBIT A EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER. PHASE I 'CALE: (p NORTH NONE _"U___ EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER HIGH TECH/BIO TECH ZONE _~'... ., HC'_ ,. J'I"~~ ~ :-ø r..c., I~r' r.,. ... .... ~ I.. , .. ..." '...1.... "0. It,-,. , " ",,,,=.. -............ II.. I... ... , I . E -1, El' 'ª_ ¡ ..:'::~: IE'-"";', ... ,"'Nt ...._-- .........- ~ ."-. ..- ... """"'. ...- ..........,_. ..' ,.. -"... .... ou __ ,... _·___..'w ..··.....'ur·... J,f a....... ",,_ .... II.. .... _ .......,,_. .' .~ -- ~... . "-' .,." ------ ,NUl.: LNÐ t.I!IE . ACÆS NO, ' ."1¡~"'t!NT Jl1 I ... : ~CMef1' 'u H ¡.....0'I"I08/T' ao ....,~1'7,. .. ""': .....0....".. tU 1..I~i ... '., ~' tU ""~ ....1 H I....~ ,... "'0 ......0'tIreIT 10 TOTAL I t"" .. E/iSTIti(E 1 ~.. - ; I A PlANNED COMMUNITY IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA. _ < ~ . Úß-\S ~tJ·, Exhibit C ....-,.,-,--....---..----.-.- ..-------.-..-- '--._..-~-- -- CITY COUNCil AGENDA STATEMENT Item ì Meeting Date 02/07/95 ITEM TITLE: Ordinance L(.2.3 Amending Section 10.56.040 of the Municipal Code Allowing Changing of the Time limit in Some Parking Meters within Certain Downtown Parking Lots and Authorizing the City Engineer to Determine the Configuration of Meters within the Parking Lots SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director(/:; . Finance Director~ Public Works Direc or~\ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ~ /"Z (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No..xl Council Referral No. N/A BACKGROUND: At the request of the Town Centre Project Area Committee (TCPAC), staff conducted an analysis on the need to convert additional short-term parking meters to long-term meters in some of the downtown parking lots. Staff's analysis determined that there is the need to take this measure in some of the parking lots as indicated in this report. The City Attorney determined that the conversion of meter time limit could be done through an ordinance adopted by the City Council. The ordinance also adds new language to the Municipal Code authorizing the City Engineer to, in the future, determine the need for and location of different meter time limits within the parking lots with the advice of the TCPAC. Staff is hereby presenting the ordinance for Council consideration and adoption. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the ordinance amending the Municipal Code to allow the conversion of 63 parking meters located in lots 2,5,8, and 9 from 4 hours to 9 hours and to authorize the City Engineer to determine the need for and location of meter time limits within the parking lots with the advice of the TCPAC. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: At its meeting of the January 5, 1995, the Town Centre Project Area Committee discussed the proposal and recommended that the City Council accept staff's recommendation (see minutes attached). On January 17, 1994, staff presented the recommendation to increase the number of 9-hour parking meters in lots 2, 5, 8, and 9 to the Downtown Business Association. The association endorsed the recommendation. Staff presented the proposal to the Director of the Chamber of Commerce who supported the proposal as presented in this report. DISCUSSION: In response to a request by the Town Centre Project Area Committee, the Parking Operations Officer and Community Development staff conducted an analysis of the existing parking situation within the Downtown Parking District to determine the need for additional 9-hour parking meters within some lots. A survey was conducted to determine the level of parking demand in the ten public parking lots and along ~- \ . ~-,-_._,-".._-_..._,,- -- --..-...-...-+......--....---.. ,..-..----- ____.__._._..__o'_____ Page 2, Item ï Meeting Date 2/07/95 Church and Landis Avenues. This survey was conducted during the period of December 2 through December 16, 1994. Staff checked the parking lots at 11 am and 3 pm on weekdays during the survey period. The purpose of the observations was to find out how many parking spaces were vacant at the times of the survey and thus determine the level of parking demand. This helped determine whether additional long-term meters could be provided to accommodate additional permit holders and make better use of the long-term parking meters. The results of this survey are listed in the attached table shown as Exhibit I. Also, see attached downtown map for location of parking lots. The survey shows that lots 2, 5, 6, and 8 have the lowest level of vacancies (35 %, 26 %, 35 %, and 15 %, respectively). The rest of the parking lots have vacancies ranging from 40% to 65%. Overall and on average, parking vacancy within the district is approximately 38%, which is down from 47% shown by surveys taken a couple of years ago. Parking demand in lot 2 is expected to increase significantly when the building at 311 F Street is in full operation and the building at 256 Landis Avenue is completed and open by the end of February 1995. Regarding parking on Landis and Church Avenues, the survey shows that parking vacancy is approximately 56% of metered spaces. This means that on both streets there is always one half of the metered spaces available. The vacant spaces were found to be evenly distributed along the street from E to F Streets; that is, the survey did not show any concentration of vacant spaces at any particular point along the streets. The meters on these streets are 2 hours and 9 hours. Staff also looked at the sale of parking permits to determine the demand for 9-hour meters within the parking lots. (Parking permits are allowed only on the 9-hour parking spaces within the parking lots). The Parking Operations Officer reported that for the period of October through December 1994, a total of 112 parking permits were purchased. It is expected that the number of permits that were sold during the last quarter of 1994 will be renewed during the first quarter of 1995. While the holders of these permits are scattered throughout the parking district, there is a significant number of them that are concentrated in the proximity of specific parking lots (see Exhibit II). The tendency of permit holders is to park in the parking lot closest to them. This is the case with lots 8 and 5 where approximately 48 permit holders are located in their proximity. The number of 9-hour meters within these lots is 38. Therefore, additional 9-hour meters need to be provided at these lots in order to accommodate permit holders. Lots 2 and 9 currently have 48 and 7 9-hour meters. The number of permit holders in the proximity of these lots is 21 and 6, respectively. Additional 9-hour meters are needed in lot 9 because the number of permit holders is almost equal to the number of available 9-hour meters. Additionally, other businesses in the proximity of this lot have expressed an interest in buying permits. If this happens, the number of permit holders wishing to park in this lot will exceed the 9-hour meters available. In Lot 2 the current number of long-term meters is 48 while the number of permit holders in its vicinity is 21. However, it is anticipated that with the opening of the Telecenter and the medical office building at the corner of Landis and Davidson the demand for 9-hour meters will increase. Additionally, the Star- News has expressed interest in purchasing some permits and gave the impression that they would park in Lot 2. Given this scenario, it is staff's opinion that additional 9-hour meters also need to be provided at this lot. Given the success of the permit system and its demand for 9-hour meters coupled with an increase in overall demand for parking, staff recommends that additional 9-hour meters be made available in parking lots 2, 5, 8, and 9. 1-2 ~. .____~_~_."_" .._..,,__.....,..._ ______.m_.__._..~._..__·__ _ _ _ _ _....__ ". _.~._._-_.__. .-,----..-----------" --"---.----.--- .----.----- Page 3, Item ì Meeting Date 2/07/95 Following is a table showing the number of metered spaces and the distribution of 4 and 9-hour meters as well as the number of meters that are being proposed to be changed. Table Total Number of Lot Number Number Number Number 4-Hour Meters of Metered of of to be Spaces 4-Hour Meters 9-Hour Meters Reconfigured 2 117 69 48 18 5 29 16 13 8 8 52 27 25 27 9 28 21 7 10 Total: 226 Total Number to be Reconfigured: 63 The rest of the downtown parking lots do not require any change. Lots 1, 6 and 7 have only 9-hour meters, while lots 3, 4 and 10 have low levels of demand and still provide an adequate number of 9-hour meters. The Parking Operations Officer indicated that the cost of changing the 63 4-hour meters to 9-hours is $30 per meter, which requires a total expenditure of $1,890. He indicated there are sufficient funds in his budget to carry out this operation without an appropriation. The City Attorney determined that the proposed change to the meter time limit needs to be implemented through an ordinance amending the Municipal Code increasing the number of 9-hour meters within the stated parking lots. The change to the time limit in the meters as outlined in this report does not change the number of parking meters or spaces within any of the parking lots. Currently, the Council is the only one authorized to make changes to the meters. This requires going to the Council every time there is a need to do that. Staff recommends that additional language be included in the Municipal Code granting authority to the City Engineer, with the recommendation from the Town Centre Project Area Committee, to determine the combination and number of 9 and/or 4-hour meters within the parking lots (see copy of ordinance attached, the new language is underlined on page 3). This change in the code will help expedite future changes to the meter time limits within the parking lots. FISCAL IMPACT: As indicated above, the cost of the meter conversion will be approximately $1,890 and will be undertaken by the Parking Operations Officer. Sufficient funds are available in the parking operations budget to undertake the conversion; no appropriation of funds by the Council is needed. The proposed change to the meter time limit will not have a significant fiscal impact because the parking spaces are available on a "first-come first-serve" basis. The permit holders pay for the permit whether they use the spaces or not. While the proposed change will provide additional 9-hour meters, these spaces can also be used, if available, to non-holders of permits who will deposit coins in the meter. [MZTfDI5K IX/SURVEY.RPT} \.~ . .-.------'.-- '--'-'-""-'-'-"'--"-"'-~"--""--'-'- -----. - - ---- --.-,. - -----------... .._._._..__.~-- ORDINANCE NO. ~t~:J AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING SECTION 10.56.040 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE - METER ZONES -DESIGNATED-FEES- SCHEDULE XI SECTION I: That section 10.56.040 of the Chula VIsta Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.56.040 Meter zones-Desiqnated-Fees-Schedule xr. In accordance with Section 10.56.030 of this chapter, parking meter zones are hereby established upon those pUblic parking lots and streets or portions of streets described herein. In such zones, parking of vehicles shall be regulated by parking meters between the hours specified in section 10.56.150 which shall permit vehicular parking for the duration specified below for all days except Sundays or public holidays, as follows: Name of Street Be~innin~ At Endin~ At Side Duration Third Avenue Alvarado Street liE" Street East 2 hours Third Avenue Roosevelt Street liE" Street West 2 hours Landis Avenue "FI1 Street 300 Ft. north of E/W 2 hours north curbline or 9 hours of "E" Street ~ Church Avenue !IF" Street IIEI! Street E/W 2 hours or 9 hours riG" Street 40 ft. west of 100 ft. east of South 30 minutes west curbline of east curbline of or 2 hours Third Avenue Church Avenue "G" Street 125 ft. west of 450 ft. east of North 1 hour or west curbline of east curbline of 2 hours Third Avenue Third Avenue Garren Avenue 100 ft. south of 150 ft. north of N/S 2 hours south curbline of north curbline tiE" Street of I1EII Street Park Way 100 ft. west of Third Avenue N/S 1 hour west curbline of Third Avenue 1 7-5 _ n...._._..._u___n..,_,_.,. __ "_,'__··"n......·", - - ,.---.>-..-...- --------- ,___., no U' H·._·..·..·__ _ ~_,. . u__.__ Del Mar Avenue !IF" Street Center Street East 9 hours Madrona Street Third Avenue 125 ft. east of N/S 1 hour east curbline of Third Avenue "P" Street Garrett Avenue Del Mar Avenue North 30 minutes or 1 hour or 2 hours "Fir Street Church Avenue Del Mar Avenue South 2 hours Center Street Third Avenue Del Mar Avenue N/S 1 hour or 9 hours Center Street Third Avenue Del Mar Avenue South 1 hour liEu Street Church Avenue Del Mar Avenue N/S 2 hours "E" Street Garrett Avenue 100 ft. east of N/S 2 hours east curbline of Landis Street Public Parkin~ Lot Duration No.1: Northwest comer of Church & Madrona 9 hours No.2: 200 block of Landis 4 hours and! or 9 hours No.3: Northeast comer of Landis & Davidson 4 hours and! or 9 hours No.4: Northwest comer of Church & Davidson 4 hours and! or 9 hours No.5: Southwest comer of Church & Davidson 4 hours and!or 9 hours No.6: Near Southeast comer of Third & Madrona 9 hours No.7: Near Southeast comer of Landis & "E" 4 Raws and/er 9 hours No.8: 281-287 Church Avenue (Church & Del Mar) 4 hours and! or 9 hours No.9: 230-232 Church Avenue 4 hours and! or 9 hours No. 10: Southwest comer of Church and Center St. 4 hours and! or 9 hours No. WI: Norman Park Senior Center between "F" Street & Center Street .¡ Z hour~ 2 ì-l..:» - - _._._----"._~. --...----... --.--..--...----- - - ----------,----,-..---,.-.-- For parkinq durations above listed, qiven in the alternative. the authoritv is hereby qranted to the City Enaineer to determine the combination/confiauration of meter durations best suited for the qiven location: except that as to Public Parkinq Lots 1-11. the city Enqineer shall solicit the recommendation and advice of the Town Centre Proiect Area Committee before exercisinq his/her authority. SECTION II: This ordinance shall take effect an e in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoptio Pre"ente' by v..~ Chris Salomone, Director of Bruce M. Community Development Attorney C:\or\1056040 3 ì-ì/1-IO -----_.__._..~-_....---- -_._~..- " -~._~_.,_...._.__._.---....__. ~ -.......--..-.-...,-,...-...- MINUTES TOWN CENTRE PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Thursday, January 5, 1995 Council Conference Room 8:45 a.m. City Hall 1. Roll Call Members Present: Chairman Blakely, Members Hawk, Mason, Altbaum and Winters. Members Excused: Member Killian. Staff Present: Parking Operations Officer, Bob Baker and Miguel Tapia, Community Development Specialist. Others Present: Steve McDonald, Star-News reporter. MSC IMasonlWinters) to excuse Member Killian. 2. Approval of Minutes of December 1, 1994. MSC (Altbaum/Mason) to approve the minutes of December 1. 1994 as submitted. PARKING BUSINESS 3. Conversion of 4-Hour Meters to 10-Hour Meters in Public lots. Community Development Specialist Miguel Tapia stated that the reason this item has been brought to the Committee is to recommend to the City Council to convert some of the existing 4-hour meters to 1 O-hour meters. Staff is recommending that 18 meters in Lot #2, 8 meters in Lot #5. 27 meters in Lot #8 and 10 meters in lot #9 be converted from 4-hour meters to 1 O-hour meters. This would be a total of 63 meters targeted for conversion. Mr. Steve McDonald, reporter from the Star-News, asked if the conversion was being proposed because of the increase in businesses raquiring all-day parking. Chairman Blakely indicated that the number of parking permits sold has increased creating a higher demand for 10-hour meters at some of the parking lots. Parking Operations Officer Bob Baker said that he had spoken with a representative from the Star-News and was told that they would be purchasing parking permits. He also said that he had received a call from a person from the medical building on Landis Avenua and they also said they would be purchasing at least tan permits. Mr. Tapia said that the study that was conducted indicated that the demand for parking has increased by about 10 to 12% from previous surveys. The demand for parking permits has also increased significantly. He added that a year ago there were only about 60 parmits sold and now about 110 permits have been sold. Chairman Blakely asked if it was known whether or not the increase in purchased parking permits came from residents. Officer Baker replied no. He said that the only residential permits purchased are from the residant! of the Congregational Towers. . 1-,\ _._.___._____."'._ .__.____..__..___~_.".~_,_.__.__~_.__.. .',. .... '-""'_0"" .. .._. ___._~_ - _______.___ .u_ .___._~..__.,_._.",._. -,-,.._-_.._----- Minutes January 5, 1995 . Page 2 Chairman Blakely asked if overnight parking has baen monitored in Lots 8 and 10. Officer Baker stated that very few of the lots have any vehicles parked overnight with the exception of Lot #10. MSC IMason/Altbaum) 15-0-1, Killian absent) to concur with staff's recommendation to City Council to convert 63 4·hour meters to 10-hour meters in public parking lots Numbers 2, 5, 8 and 9 and introduce language in the Municipal Code to allow the City Engineer to determine the combination of 4 and 10-hour meters within the parking lots. Chairman's Comments: None. Member's Comments: None. Staff Comments: None. Public Comments: None. Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 9:10 a.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for January 19,1995. 0Jm;rð1i~ IFiI.:\TCPACMIN\b:~an5-95.minl . \-ID __ _·'..______M.. ._.._ ..,.._,_,.._ ·'m·_____,~_ ~,- --, ._.___..._...____._.. .0. ._n_....__.._ EXHIBIT I Survey Parking Demand Downtown Parking Lots Church & Landis Avenues Dec. 2 thru Dec. 16, 1994 Average Vacant Lot Existing Spaces Percent Number Spaces for period Vacancy ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- 1 29 19 65.23% 2 121 42 34.71% 3 78 32 40.92% 4 34 14 41.91% 5 30 8 25.83% 6 46 16 35.14% 7 14 7 52.98% 8 54 8 15.28% 9 29 14 49.71% 10 70 33 46.43% ----- ------ ----- ----- ------ ----- Totals = = > 505 194 38.33% Church Ave 63 35 56.28% Landis Av. 65 36 55.52% ----- ------ ----- ----- ------ ----- Totals==> 128 72 55.89% ì-\\ /'7-l2 "E" ' . STREETE>fhibit II: j r-r t-- =m 1 " c a.; -ør ,,, fO..P- --. r ~ -.... (')_.~_. 0 ø _.ø Þ I fTl r ,Þ - Z ___ r----- c _ _ r O ~, :u 0 ;U l:u () _ '---< -fTl iñ I ~ e---- ~ r----.- __ ~ --- -- ~- - f----- --.-- . ---.J - - _ ,_ ð.. ___ ¡ _ e----- - 1-__ IjO\" ___.-- -. \:: ::!- - __ (,I I~, ~._ __ ~ _ þ \AJ I\_....~ Þ <: e "- :u ---- ·fTl __ ~__'~ I DAVIDSOtJ I II ~ (ó,) (,... ___ __ -L : I _..1_ f-'--- ~ "1 VI I ,_ _ - e-- _uL 1---... ___ _ --- -- I:!! .._._ _" ~ Þ .-þ Þ Þ J ---I~, < ~ --1 <:-----~ fTl I fTl , ____ __ ,... ... ' \ I -.- _. - - ¡ --.-¡.-'--¡-!- 1-- Ii L-~ f -.-- ~ Iii ' "F" STREET I @'I ~ 11: ~ J~ . "'I !' ¡ i: ' ~ -- e @~~~-~._~:'_ - - "':'1:> -.- t --- ,.... --.., ._- .----,-..- CENTER 5T. I\- CENTER ST. ___+_ ~ (') I ..- - ..... ~ ~- ------- ; ~ 0 ~ n.___ ~-- ... .-- - -- ~ I _c. CYPRESS » -- --. I I f= < ~ (T ~ ~-~ ;::--___-:-1 -,- I - ..... ............. __._ __ I L I " ~ ! í u MADRONA .... PARK WAY / r- f- -'nTi - f"::; '/ ¡ ~ ~ // i I I ' ~ -~. -=:1- ,J./ I ~ 5 I ì<ì I [i - , "G" STREET i-I ~ , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : I II .._.1 91_~-1 I I II ! : I! _______._"u_n__.._._____ ----- CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 8" Meeting Date 2-7-9S ITEM TITLE: Resolution 17791 Approving Joint Use Agreement with San Diego Gas & Electric Company to Construct, Operate and Maintain Certain Facilities Associated with Palomar Trolley Center and Authorizing Mayor to Execute Agreement SUBMITTED BY, Comm",'<y D...,opm.,';!J;"' ~~, REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ~ ---=' (4/Sths Vote: Yes _ No.ILl BACKGROUND: The development of the alomar Trolley Center required the installation of a 66-inch storm drain and an 8-inch sewer line On the project site and the public street accessing the MTDB trolley station as public improvements. The public improvements are placed within an SDG&E easement for transmission lines, and SDG&E requests the Joint Use Agreement to govern the installation and maintenance of those public improvements (see site map, Exhibit B of resolution). RECOMMENDATION: That the Council adopt the resolution approving the Joint Use Agreement and authorizing the Mayor to execute the agreement. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable DISCUSSION: The public improvements for the Palomar Trolley Center have been completed, as has Phase I of the center. SDG&E allowed the installation of the storm drain and the sewer to go forward without the Joint Use Agreement being finalized and executed in order to facilitate the timely development of the shopping center in time for the 1994 holiday season. It is nOW being brought forward for approval. The Joint Use Agreement identifies the rights of the parties relative to the improvements. Both parties rights are reasonable and appropriate. The significant conditions of the agreement are as follows: 1. The City will have the right to ingress and egress to maintain the improvements, subject to SDG&E's right to require reconfiguration of that ingress and egress if the ingress and egress conflicts with SDG&E's use of the easement. 2. As the easement holder, SDG&E's rights and interests are superior. 3. If the City subsequently proposes any improvements in the easement other than the storm drain and the sewer line, a process is established for processing such requests, and SDG&E retains sole right to approve or deny such requests. 4. Each party saves, indemnifies, and holds harmless the other. When executed by the Mayor, the agreement will be executed by SDG&E and recorded. ~J ,-,'--_.'----- "-""_.. ._'.----- ._--- - ..__._--~---_...._- - - ----~------- Page 2, Item ( Meeting Date 2/7/95 FISCAL IMPACT: The recommended action has no fiscal impact. SDG&E is requiring no financial consideration for the use by the City of the easement. The subject public improvements have been installed by the Palomar Trolley Center developer at no cost to the City. The Palomar Trolley Center is projected to generate $4.67 million of net City/Agency tax revenue over the first 12 years of operation. IDG\DISK6\WPWIN\A:PTCSDGE.1 1 31 1"" r2... _...______._____~__. ..o._MO.._ .___"_________________.___ ." - ------- "-".. --'..----------- ----~ RESOLUTION /7771 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CIIULA VISTA APPROVING JOINT USE AGREEMENT WITH SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the development of the Palomar Trolley Center, a commercial retail shopping center in the Southwest Redevelopment Project in the City of Chula Vista, requires the construction, operation, and maintenance of certain public improvements in an easement to San Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E"), said easement as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B; and, WHEREAS, the subject public improvements consist of a 66-inch storm drain and an 8-inch sewer line, configured as depicted in Exhibit B; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista ("City") and SDG&E desire to agree to conditions regarding the installation, operation, and maintenance of the subject public improvements in the SDG&E easement; and WHEREAS, that certain document, Joint Use Agreement (#######), establishes conditions under which the City may install, operate, and maintain the subject public improvements in the SDG&E easement. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby rmd, order, determine and resolve that the Joint Use Agreement between the City and SDG&E is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same. PRESENTED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: CL ç&~- Chris Salomone Bruce M. Boogaard Community Development Director City Attorney [DGIDISK6IWPWINIA:PTCSDGE.RESI <r')lc¡~~ -.-....-.. ..--..--------- - --,~.,..._.._.. -~--~_.....__.--- -- ----,-----_.~- Recording Requested by City of San Diego When recorded, mail to: San Diego Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 1831 San Diego, CA 92112 Attn: Terry W. Nebel SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE JOINT USE AGREEMENT The undersigned declares consideration is less than $100.00 and Transfer Tax is none. THIS AGREEMENT, dated, by and between SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, a corporation (SDG&E), and the City ofChula Vista (Second Party), is made with reference to the following facts: A. SDG&E is engaged in the business of transmitting and distributing gas and . electricity within the County of San Diego, State of California and has facilities for such purposes located in, upon, over, under and across that certain easement and right-of-way granted to SDG&E as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (SDG&E's Easement); B. Second Party desires to acquire and is now acquiring easements and rights-of-way and intends to construct, operate and maintain therein a 66" storm drain and an 8" sewer line in the configuration shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto (Second Party's Facilities); and C. Second Party desires to obtain SDG&E's consent for the construction, operation and maintenance of Second Party's facilities in, over, under and across SDG&E's Easement along the route(s) particularly shown on said Exhibit "B" (Designated Route(s). NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: [S:lnebcl~ointu.doc] y,f' __________,,_____'__ .. "'__"w.__·__·~ __ ____________.._,___.,._~_ ."'n.________ .. . ~---..__.~-_..~-- --"--.'-~--'"-- ,.. 1. Second Party, its successors in interest and assigns, shall have the right and privilege to construct, operate and maintain Second Party's Facilities in, over, under and across SDG&E's Easement by the Designated Route(s), together with the right of ingress thereto and egress therefrom by practical route(s). In the event Second Party's route(s) of ingress or egress at any time, in the sole discretion of SDG&E, conflict with SDG&E's use of the SDG&E Easement,Second Party agrees, upon notice from SDG&E, to relocate said route(s) at no expense to SDG&E. SDG&E shall cooperate with Second Party to effect such ~. .....(;'I..'l.t, relocation or- of routes for . ingress or egress. Nothing herein shall permit SDG&E to unilateral!' ~~~'require thi/relocation or reconstructions of the Second Party's . Facilities._ 2. Second Party agrees not to interrupt the use or operation of SDG&E's facilities. Any temporary interference with the use or operation of SDG&E's facilities shall be made only with SDG&E's prior written consent. 3. SDG&E shall be deemed the "party first in place" and its rights and interests shall be prior in time and superior in title to those of Second Party. 4. Should Second Party desire to construct, install and maintain surface or subsurface installations other than those specifically provided for in Exhibit "B", Second Party shall obtain prior written approval of plans and specifications for any such proposed installation from SDG&E, including alignment and locations of all proposed work. Second Party will submit such plans in writing to SDG&E not less than forty-five (45) days before the date ofanticipated commencement ofany work. Notices shall be addressed to: Land Services Department San Diego Gas & Electric p, O. Box 1831 San Diego, CA 92112-4150 SDG&E reserves the right to reject any proposed plan which would, in its sole detennination, substantially conflict with its use ofth~ SDG&E Easement, its facilities, or be "unduly burdensome." SDG&E shall consider the (1) relative size and character or its then existing and possible future installations, (2) relative hardship, inconvenience, and expense to SDG&E if plans are approved, (3) relative hardship, inconvenience and expense to Second Party if plans are rejected, and (4) length of time and extent of any service interruption to SDG&E's customers. 11 Changes recommended by City Attorney (S:\n.bcl~oinlU.doc] 2 3''' ¿, ---.-.-.--.-.---..--.....-,....---.,-.--.--.,.-,----.--------.---- --_._----------_..._."_._--~-~_._...._.~--'---- 5. This agreement shall run with the land and be binding upon both parties, their representatives, agents, successors, and assigns. 6. In the event of damage caused by an act of God, war, or other casualty, or damage caused under circumstances where it would be impractical or impossible for SDG&E to notify the Second Party of the necessity for temporary interference with the other party's facilities, SDG&E, without notice, may enter upon the joint easement area and make emergency repairs to restore service. SDG&E shall, however, take reasonable and prudent measures to protect the installations of the Second Party and minimize such interference and as soon as practically possible, notify the Second Party of such emergency repairs. If pennanent repairs are required after such emergency repairs have been made, reasonable notice shall be given to the Second Party. 7. Each party shall save, indemnity and hold harmless the other party against any liability, loss, cost, damage and expense caused by or arising from (i) an act(s) or omission( s) of such party, its employees, agents, contractors, successors and assigns or (ii) the location and existence of its above-described facilities, whether defective or otherwise; including, but not limited to, any such loss, cost, damage, liability and expense arising from damage to or destruction of real and personal property or injury to or death of any person. Liability to a third party lies) shall be divided between the parties hereto in proportion to the measure of each party's liability. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each party shall hold harmless the other party against damage to or destruction of its facilities caused by an act(s) ofa third party lies). 8. Nothing herein contained shall constitute a grant of easement by SDG&E to Second Party, it being understood that any such grant may be obtained only from the fee owner. 9. In the event either party commences legal action against the other by reason of an alleged breach of this agreement or in connection with joint use of the SDG&E Easement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover court costs and attorney's fees as set by the court. "Prevailing Party" means the party in whose final judgment is rendered. [S:\nebcl\jointu.doc] 3 8''''} ___.__~____..m_~._ _________ ...._.._._________.___. __ __ ________ "-- ---... .~-~._._._._--_._--_.- . .-- ........ ".". _..."- ----_._.~---- - IN WIlNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by duly authorized officers on the day and year first above written. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRlC CO., City of Chula Vista, a Corporation a Municipal Corporation By: By: Ralph D. Richardson, Supervisor Shirley Horton, Mayor Land Management Section, City ofChula Vista Land Services Department Drawn By: TWN Date: October 19, 1993 RfWNo.: 45278 A.P. No.: 622-030-16 IS:\nebel~ointu.doc] 4 ~...ý _,_,,__,_., __~~__._~._~__u._··_..___..,··..._._·,··.___.______·_ ----- _....,~"._--,_......._-,.,.- -------.-- - --------"- Exhibit "A" That certain strip efland 250' in width, lying within Let 1, efthe Seuthwest Quarter o.fSectien 15, Tewnship 18 Seuth, Range 2 West, San Bernardino. Meridian, in the City efChula Vista, Co.unty o.fSan Diego., State efCalifemia, accerding to. Map thereof No. 729, filed in the Office o.f the Ceunty Recerder o.f said Ceunty ef San Diego., described in an easement to. San Diego. Gas & Electric Cempany, reco.rded Nevember 18,1959, Decument No.. 238737, Beek 7999, Page 131, ef Official Recerds ef said Co.unty Of San Diego.. EXHIBIT ftA" 8"'" , - . ---- ~~.~--_._---"-_._-_."---- - --..---- ..-...----- ______.....__..___._.___.__·____..m_ · \I I " II II I II \ I \ I II PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ---~ \ II PER DOC. NQ - - " /1- \ II Â = 1771'49" R ;; 78.00' l ;; 22.81' \ EXlS77NG 250' 1:>1:> , S.D. a tt £. ~. = 27'45~.J\ II EASEMENT . / ;; R;; 275.00 " ~ 'l. l -/3.1/9' II ~. ~ . I II I '" / 'ij r;:¡ SE/lÆR tt STOI?N DRA~ ~ " \ EAS£MENT PER Poll. N .... 1/1 ~ \. \ III ~/ J ~ " k ~ II t! PUBLIC 66" STORM DRAIN \ II '$ :: ~/ t/rPll81lC8-SE/IFH \ I II / ~ \ " .e>ÿ I" I! \ II " II ~ C¡VATE 24" STORN DRAIN 1/ ' - II -----\-- 10. 8.5' N 06"J6'o5~ E II .13.95' RRQ.Æcl ¡(JIj!.l!(ARx,/ -- -- I 1\ I I EXHIBIT FOR THE s.o.G. ct £ EX HI BIT ~¡B" JOINT USE A(;R££I,IENT PALOMAR TROLlEY CENTER Job no. !l66. 00 CHULA ~STA, CA O,/t? 10/28/9J ^_.~________ ".__._........_...._.______'" _M__ '. -,.,,--,._----',_..-,-_.._--.- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 9 Meeting Date 02/07/95 ITEM TITLE: Resolution J 7 g'p(I Amending Schedule V, Section 10.52.320 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code - Stopping, Standing or Parking - Prohibited during certain hours on certain streets within the Auto Park. SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director C. . S . Director of Public WOrkS";: REVIEWED BY: City Manager r (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoXl BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Assessment District 90-2, the City will soon be asked to accept the street improvements in the Chula Vista Auto Park, Auto Park Drive, and the extension of Brandywine Avenue. In accordance with the Otay Valley Redevelopment Plan and Auto Park Master Plan, both sides of these streets have been posted with "No Parking" signs. The Auto Park developers have requested that parking be allowed on the streets. Section 10.52.310 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code allows the City Council, by resolution, to prohibit parking. RECOMMENDATION: That the Council approve the resolution amending Schedule V, Section 10.52.320, establishing daytime parking on the south side of Auto Park Drive and both sides of Brandywine Avenue south of Auto Park Drive for a trial period of six months. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee considered the request to allow on-street parking in the Auto Park at their meeting of January 23, 1995. The Committee recommended to allow on-street parking as proposed with no additional conditions. The PAC did not consider the interim approval of on-street parking. The minutes of the meeting are attached as Exhibit A. DISCUSSION: In planning the new Auto Park and internal street system, it was conditioned that there would be no "on-street" parking. This is consistent with the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area Design Guidelines/Implementation Plan and the Auto Park Master Plan. The prohibition against on-street parking is intended to provide for an open and attractive street scene, comfortable circulation and open views from the street into the dealerships and display areas. It was conditioned that the Auto Park site plan would provide sufficient off street parking for employees, customers and new cars. However, with the recent completion of the Ford and Chevrolet dealerships, it has became apparent that the dealers underestimated the amount of space needed for inventory. It is not uncommon to see most of the off street parking spaces occupied by new cars and all of the street parking spaces utilized by employees and/or customers. When their plans were submitted, the auto dealers were required to provide parking spaces based upon the square footage of their showrooms, offices, service areas, and parts departments. South Bay Chevrolet was required to provide 69 spaces in total, and they 9-1 --~-"---~'-"---'--"~-'--~--'-------'-'-"'-'-"'-'--'- -- - ----- -_..'~---"-"-'-~-- -'-'~--"- - -_.._~--_.._. ,--""-- --. ~-~-- Page 2, Item r Meeting Date 02/07/95 provided 100. Fuller Ford/Honda was required to provide 118, and they provided 148. The excess parking spaces were to accommodate inventory needs. Because of the specialized nature of the dealerships, staff had to rely upon information from the dealers concerning their inventory needs. Although the dealers provided spaces for inventory, the number of spaces were clearly underestimated. Although the streets in the Auto Park are posted with "No Parking" signs, the "No Parking" restriction is not being enforced by the Police Department because the street improvements have not yet been accepted by the city. It is anticipated that final inspection of these streets will be completed by mid-February, at which time the city will have the authority to enforce any posted parking prohibition. The Auto Park developers have requested that when the streets are accepted by the City, parking be allowed on Auto Park Drive and Brandywine Avenue extension to accommodate their needs. Their request was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer with the conclusion that street parking can be safely accommodated, providing street parking is limited to only one side of Auto Park Drive (the south side where there is a sidewalk). Parking can be accommodated on both sides of Brandywine Avenue south of Auto Park Drive. There is a sidewalk along the west curbline and east curbline of Brandywine Avenue. Auto Park Drive is a 33 foot wide street with a double yellow stripe on the centerline of the roadway. The proposed parking on the south side would therefore be adjacent to the sidewalk. Thus, approximately 1000 feet of double yellow centerline striping would have to be removed by sand blasting and be repainted 3.5 foot north of the existing centerline of the road to provide for an 8 foot wide parking lane and a 12 foot wide eastbound through lane. The westbound through lane will be 13 feet wide with no parking allowed. Approximately 36 on-street parking spaces will be added. Brandywine Avenue south of Auto Park Drive is 36 feet wide with a painted double yellow stripe on the centerline. The existing striping does not have to be changed to accommodate parking along each curbline, only the "No Parking" signs will need to be replaced. Approximately 25 on-street parking spaces will be added. Therefore, the proposed recommendation will add a total of approximately 61 on-street parking spaces within the Auto Park. Since safety is not an issue, staff has no objections to parking in the Auto Park in the areas noted above and further described on the following schedule. However, the general disorderly appearance of the Auto Park, the impact on attracting new quality dealerships, and on the redevelopment area in general are major concerns. At this time, many more cars are parked in the streets than spaces can be provided by allowing parking as described in this report. Furthermore, the display pads which were to attractively showcase new models adjacent to Otay Valley Road are congested with cars and simply being used to store inventory. The public parking lot at the terminus of Brandywine Avenue to serve the future regional park is also being used for inventory and employee parking. 9,.2. ____.__u_._______._.__.'_.____,_____ ___._.~_______....____.___ "__'______ ... _ ____"._._..______,_______.._ _____._..,.__"" Page 3, Item~ Meeting Date 02/07/95 If the City is asked to compromise design criteria, there must be a commitment on the part of the auto dealers to better control their inventory, employee and customer parking. If necessary, the dealers can provide off-site storage areas for excess inventory. Vacant land is currently available to ~he east of the Chevrolet dealership and to the west of the Ford/Honda dealership to accommodate these needs. Once these parcels are sold to other dealerships, parking shortages in the area will be exacerbated. The present over-parked and congested condition is not the image that was presented to the Council and Agency when the project was approved. In fact, the Auto Center Master Plan, approved as part of the Special Permit for the Auto Center, prohibits on-street parking and provided a schematic design for a typical display area (attached as Exhibit B). It is therefore recommended that on-street parking be allowed on an interim basis, subject to resolution of all parking, display and storage issues. Conditions will be reviewed by the City Council in six months. If parking, maintenance and appearance of the Auto Park continue to be problematic and the dealerships have not taken action to provide adequate parking, storage and appropriate use of display areas, the Council will have the option to discontinue on-street parking. Furthermore, any proposal to sell parcel #4 for development of a new dealership will be scrutinized to ensure adequate parking and storage. To discourage overnight parking by commercial vehicles, and to enhance security of the Auto Park, the on-street parking spaces should be designated to allow parking only during the hours of 6 A.M. to 10 P.M. Vehicles parked after 10 P.M. would be subject to towing. This action is similar to Council's previous approval of parking on Energy Way and Nirvana Avenue (during the day only), also within the Redevelopment Area. Since on-street parking was not anticipated, no parking schedule is referenced in the Chula Vista Municipal Code for the Auto Park. Thus, it is not necessary to rescind any previous parking resolution to alter the proposed parking plan for the Auto Park, only to amend Schedule V. Section 10.52.310 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code allows the City Council by resolution to prohibit parking during certain hours. Section 10.52.320 - Stopping, Standing, or Parking - Prohibited between certain hours on certain streets - Schedule V Hours Name of Street Beginning At Ending At Side Prohibited Auto Park Drive west cul-de-sac east cul-de-sac South 10:00 pm - 6:00 am Brandywine south curbline of A point 403' Both 10:00 pm - 6:00 Avenue Auto Park Drive south am For reference, a map illustrating the existing no parking restriction and the proposed parking restoration proposal is attached. A total of approximately 61 on-street parking spaces will be added on these two streets. It should be noted that the allowance of parking on one side of Auto Park Drive will necessitate the relocation of the double yellow center line stripe at a cost of around $3,700. The cost to remove and replace (17) "No Parking" signs to "Tow-Away, No Parking 10 P.M. - 6 A.M." is estimated at $950. The auto park developers have agreed to assume these costs which amount to $4,650, or provide the work through their contractors. 9-J ----,._-~--,.._._. .....-...".--- -.--..-.-.-.--- - -------...-.--., m___' . .____.m Page 4, Item 1 Meeting Date 02/07/95 FISCAL IMPACT: Cost to re-stripe and revise (17) signs in Auto Park will be borne by the Auto Park developers and is estimated at $4,650. At the end of the trial period, if Council wants to prohibit parking, the $4,650 cost to re-do this work will have to be paid again by the dealers Attachments: Area Plat Minutes OVRPAC - January 23, 1995 (Exhibit A) Schematic Plan (Exhibit B) [AK:AUTOPARKIPARKSIG2.113] 9-'; - ---------------.--. ----._._,----~-_.__. ." p_ _.___._. n____.__ --"-----.-.----.'-- ---..--- RESOLUTION NO. I'" ~OO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING SCHEDULE V, SECTION 10.52.320 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKING - PROHIBITED DURING CERTAIN HOURS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE AUTO PARK WHEREAS, pursuant to Assessment District 90-2, the City will be accepting the street improvements in the Chula vista Auto Park, Auto Park Drive, and the extension of Brandywine Avenue; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Otay Valley Redevelopment Plan and Auto Park Master Plan, both sides of these streets have been posted with "No Parking" signs; and WHEREAS, the Auto Park developers have requested that when the streets are accepted by the city, parking be allowed on Auto Park Drive and Brandywine Avenue extension to accommodate their needs; and WHEREAS, their request was reviewed by the City's Traff ic Engineer with the conclusion that street parking can be safely accommodated, providing street parking is limited to only one side of Auto Park Drive (the south side where there is a sidewalk) and parking can be accommodated on both sides of Brandywine Avenue south of Auto Park Drive; and WHEREAS, since safety is not an issue, staff has no objections to parking in the Auto Park in the areas noted àbove and further described on the following schedule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby amend Schedule V, section 10.52.320 of the Chula vista Municipal Code to - Stopping, Standing or Parking - Prohibited during certain hours on certain streets within the Auto Park, as follows: Section 10.52.320 - Stopping, Standing, or Parking - Prohibited between certain hours on certain streets - Schedule V Expira- Hours tion Name of Street Beginning At Ending At Side Prohibited Date Auto Park Drive west cul-de-sac east cul-de-sac South 10:00 pm 8/7/95 - 6:00 am Brandywine south curbline of A point 403' Both 10:00 pm 8/7/95 Avenue Auto Park Drive south - 6:00 am q-5 "---"--"--'---~'---'-~----------"------ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the "Parking/storage/Display" provisions of the Chula vista Auto Center Master Plan Revised Draft: October 6, 1992, are hereby amended to reflect the above exception for the duration listed. Presented by V""J John P. Lippitt, Director of Bruce M. Public Works Attorney C:\rs\park.V q-~ _________________ __m_._.__, -- --.-'-'-."-- ..,-. .,..--..".-.- _.._~-- ..," --,-------~. .... ill ~ ""i III ~- ~~ í1 Q:ii5 I !; I ! !I' &tJ8 - 1 I- ... <I: . ~ ~ -I &.) ~ ~ '3N' ì!E ~ Q. '" . , 3NIM^ON\f~a I ;ii' ~ u.1 <C z ~: :;¡ 0 W ::IE w w a: a: 0 a: ~ l- t/) w II I w a: <C z w 1IIIt 0 z~ N ::3 z C C z c 0 III 52 z c Z - z a: ~ - I UJ ~ a: ~ " 0 ~ ~ UJ z o Q. I , : I c z w ...J z c ! I ~ Z I- i= ~ I I t x t/) 0 w ~ ~ I · I I · I · · · . · c.,:::) :z: 0 9~ l/q~9 _>-LIJ '") ~ :z: :E ::I, Cc::cr:- ~ t- . - -. - - Minutes ,Q~AFT OTAY VALLEY ROAD PROJECT AREA COMMI E Monday, January 23,1995 Conference Rooms 2&3 9:00 a.m. Public Servicas B\Jilding 1. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Casillas; Mambers McMahon, Palumbo, Nava Absent: Hall (excused) Also: Redevalopmant Coordinator Kassman, Frank Rivera, Associate Traffic Engineer, and John McCormick, property ownar 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES from the meetings of July 25 and August 22, 1994. Member Palumbo indicated that he was not sitting as a member at the meeting of July 25, although he was in tha audience. He indicated he would have to abstain on approval of the minutes. MSC (McMahon/Casillas) to approve the minutes of July 25 as mailed (3-0-1-1; Hall absent; Palumbo abstained). Concerning the minutes of August 22, 1994, Chairman Casillas indicated that he was not at that maating and would abstain from approving the minutes. MSC (Palumbo/McMahon) to approve the minutes as mailed (3-0-1-1; Hall absent; Casillas abstained) . 3. Request to allow on-street parking in the Auto Park - The Auto Park developers have raquested that on-street parking be allowed to accommodate their employees. Staff indicated that the Auto Park davelopers had requested permission to allow on-straet parking on Auto Park Drive and Brandywine Avenua because they did not have enough parking spaces for their employees, customers and stock due to under-planning. The problem seems to be that the stock is occupying spaces that were designated for employee þarking. The employees ara currently parking on both sidas of Auto Park Drive and the extension of Brandywine Avenue, and also in the public parking lot at the end of Brandywine Avenue. A raport has bean prepared to ba submitted to City Council on Feb. 7 racommending parking on one side of Auto Park Drive and on both sides of Brandywine Avenue to accommodate the Auto Park needs. Member Palumbo askad about consideration for people who will be using tha Otay Regional Park. Where will they park? There is need for more parking spaces in the area. Member Palumbo indicated he has no problem with people parking on tha street, he is pro business, but there is a nead to reserve more parking for park-ralated use. Chairman Casillas indicatad that he toured the araa with City Council and the Auto Park really seemed congasted. It is hard to gat through the area with parking on both sides. The Auto Park developers really unde(estimatad their needs. Pl,lns were submitted and approved which included off-street parking. Parking could be allowed for employeas only on a tamporary basis, when other dealerships go in, widar streets could be provided or additional off-street parking. Mamber Mcmahon indicated that tha experts for tha City recommendad to allow parking on tha streets. There would be no problem. The area can accept on-street parking. Member Palumbo stated that there is on-street parking in Mission Valley and EI Cajon Boulevard where there are other auto dealerships. Why should Chula Vista be different? .Mr. Palumbo indicated that when he designed his building, by the time tha landscape architect and planners were done reviewing the plans, he had to take out parking spaces to put in more landscaping. Member Palumbo said he was raady to recommend to allow on-street parking in tha Auto Park. 9-7 Staff indicatad that the width of Auto Park Drive was 33 feet and could support parking on one' side. The extension of Brandywine Avenue is 36 feet and could accommodate parking on both sides. The , ---~----~~---- Minutes, Otay Valley Road PAC -2- January 23, 1995 center line on Auto Park Drive however, would have to be moved to the north to maintain safe passageways. Member Palumbo questioned whether the curbs will be painted and whether street signs limiting speed, or speed bumps, could be installed. Staff indicated that this could be considered by the City Council. Chairman Casillas suggested that this be included with the motion. Member McMahon indicated that if the speed limits are not posted, they are automatically 25 MPH and it wasn't necessary to post them again. Member Nava asked how many parking spaces would be provided on-street? Staff responded that approximately 21 spaces could ba providad on the Brandywine Avenue axtension. Auto Park Drive, in front of the Chevrolet dealership could provide 9-10 parking spaces. Auto Park Drive in front of the ForlHonda dealership could provide 25 ± spaces. Miss Nava asked how wide the sidewalk was. Staff answered that tha sidewalk was 8 faet, per City standards for commercial areas. MSC (Palumbo/McMahon 1 to accept staff recommendation to allow parking on the south side of Auto Park Drive and on both sides of Brandywine Avenue south of Auto Park Drive (3-0-'-'; Hall absent; Casillas abstained I. 4. STATUS REPORTS: Updata of current projects in Otay Vallay Road Project Area a. Auto Park Mr. Kassman indicatad that tha Chavrolet and FordlHonda dealerships are open for business. Early indications show that sales are at least as good as they wara on Broadway and, in Ford's case, have exceeded broadway sales on sevaral weakands when special promotional events were undertaken. However, sales have recantly been slowed by the paso davaluation. Both dealerships will have to do better than their old locations in ordar to meet the higher cost of operations at the new facilities. b. Otay Valley Road Mr. Kassman noted there hava baen delays re,cently in completing Otay Valley Road due to tha need to remove saveral utility lines on tha north sida of the road and the recant rains. As soon as the rain stops, work will proceed. The contractor gets rain delay days so it does not cut into the number of days he has to finish the work. However, bacause of the rain, it now looks as if all of the road work will not be completed until the end of March or earty April; perhaps, not until the end of April. c. Trash Transfer Site Mr. Kassman reported that staff has selected the upper portion of the Hazard Storage Yard 89 the praferred site for the trash transfer site. Negotiations have begun with the owners of the proparty. The City is seeking to option the property until a final decision is made on whether to move forward with the project. This could take up to a year and a half. Member Palumbo indicated that he was not happy with the selection of tha site. There are a lot of substantial investments in the area and this could have a negative impact on property values. Chairman Casillas indicated that he thought the committee should raise some issues with City staff. Tha othar site under consideration, which is at the easterty end of Enargy Way, seemed much more appropriate. Member Palumbo asked why the site couldn't be located on County landfill property, Can any of that property be developed? 5. ORAL COMMENTS 9-7 a. Mr. John McCormick, proparty owner in the area indicated that on-straat parking within the Auto Park should alsohava certain areas dasignatad as loading zones. There should be no overnight parking, similar to Energy Way and Nirvana Avenue. That seems to reduce the - ------~.__..-_._"..._-,- -----.....---.-...-.. _ ..' ._..._~_..__ _._~____..___,..w___·___~·___····_··,_ -----_.,--,._--,--.._~.- . lr . \11 . ¡ . ~\~ I '-:.,.'J:Yf. r, ..- ' "r ñ 0.<', ,.?"" .~" J. , ~ ,'" "'-a ,,, _ "" T -. - . "' ~ It::. 'I . : .. n , ~', - ~..;, 1"'.' .. · at . ~~ l.%:l\v,~., JV " ~ """,,,,< " , 'C w " ,. , , t. ;! tII ~ ~ " ...' ""-_ ¿ " I ~ "C '2:.. ~,. ~ ""'ÌL;" . · ¡;- ~?i . ~JJ .. . ~ . J. . . ~ .1 '< 'T1' .' , r (.. 'I' - 'I. r" " :;: j.\'2 , j uµ ~~'" ' s» ¡I I ~ ' '" "~~ , c.. !I' 'k " ~ -'. "",,-. '.r<" rnu. , m ~ ~ "'ðÆ:.u.~m".) . I. , t!~ ..... ""~, ' ::J < r . " ~ ~; nr . r ~ iiï , '- ;:- __ ~ ~ t I"~': 'u .., ,~ .' , r "<' '- \Q , ... " ~ 'I:::' ,'," ( J r:' )'p ~r) 3 "';." ... ~ ~ ~"-b(, 'II' : ti: 12= ~~ ..~ .~ '( g ..... ~ . <to : '(If'~' , ' JI c 'i , ... r1 " 1"'¡4..k ,. u . 1- . '"l. .~. 1'')...1 ,fit. ~L li~" '<\C'!. ~~" V- '~,)-~J . ' = ~ , \\"'"", ~ "'II.~ 'I ~ " \, :.V(1J;¡IO~', · ~ f~ ~"~~ .~ ¿". , L . ~, j!f.' .. ~ , ' ~"I.. tLtr- f ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I. , 'l ç¡< ---h~~ ,..1; '~~ 'Ð ~~t ~n~ ' \j ~ ..:. ~r- -iFl~ \..\.' "/ . (\~\)~ I~r 9-ltJ , . ~J ~ ~ . - ~._-- - ,- . . ^"----- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT /~ Item Meeting Date 2/07/95 ITEM TITLE: Resolution 17K"(I1 Accepting bids and awarding contract for tree trimming services in the City of Chula Vista, California SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works REVIEWED BY: At 2:00 p.m. on January 11, 1995, in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for tree trimming services in the City of Chula Vista. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution accepting bids and awarding contract to Atlas Environmental Services, Inc. in the amount of $69,600.62 BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The City tree trimming section currently consists of one Sr. Public Works Supervisor who supervises the Street Tree Division, three Sf. Tree Trimmer positions and three Tree Trimmer positions. Since the mid 1980's, as the City grew, we have augmented the tree trimming efforts by using contractors instead of increasing the size of the City tree trimming crews. City staff usually block trims about 1200 trees per year and 2600 by contract. In addition, City crews perform tree removal & replanting in conjunction with the sidewalk repair program and complaint, hazard, and decorative trimming. Funds for tree trimming services are included in the FY 1994-95 budget. The subject contract includes the trimming of a total of 2,619 trees located at various locations throughout the City. A listing of all trees and locations is on file in the City Clerk's Office. On the bid opening date, bids were received from four contractors as follows, in order of the lowest bid f¡rst: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1. Atlas Environmental Services, Inc., Spring Valley $ 69,600.62 2. Transpacif¡c Environmental, Inc., La Habra $ 77,601.00 3. Golden Bear Arborists, Inc., Monrovia $ 98,995.00 4. West Coast Arborists, Inc., Buena Park $105,524.00 /~- , --....-.----- -,._--- --------.--_.,--..._- . .._-~..._- --.-.- -- - -_....._-~--_.__.-.._- ----- Page 2, Item / # Meeting Date 2/07/95 The low bid received from Atlas Environmental Services, Inc. is below the budgeted amount of $80,000.00 by $10,399.38 or 13%. We have reviewed the low bid and recommend awarding the contract to Atlas Environmental Services, Inc. Prevailing Wage Statement This project is funded initially by the City's General Fund then reimbursed by the Gas Tax Fund. Since tree trimming is a service contract project, no prevailing wage requirements were necessary or a part of the bid documents. Compliance with Federal and State minority/women owned business requirements was unapplicable on this project. Environmental Status The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that this project is categorically exempt under Class I, Section 15301(h) "Maintenance of Existing Landscaping." Disclosure Statement Attached is a Disclosure Statement executed by the Contractor. FUND REQUIRED TO AWARD CONTRACT 1. Contract Amount $69,600.62 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONTRACT $69,600.62 FUNDS AVAILABLE TO AWARD CONTRACT 1. 100-1450-5203 $80,000.00 2. Postage & Advertising Costs 215.44 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE TO AWARD CONTRACT $79,784.56 FISCAL IMP ACT: This action will authorize the expenditure of $69,600.62 of previously appropriated funds. Attachment: Bidder Disclosure Statement SA:JY-063 WPC F:\home\cngineer\agenda\tree9495.a13 /þ ...,,- ---"--- - ..-...--_._~ -----,~_._----_.- ._.-._---_...._-_._~----_.,._-_.__. -- - --".-...-. RESOLUTION NO. J '} Y If I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR TREE TRIMMING SERVICES IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on January 11, 1995, in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public Works received the following four bids for Tree Trimming Services in the city of Chula vista, California: Atlas Environmental Services, Inc. $ 69,600.62 Spring Valley Transpacific Environmental, Inc. $ 77,601.00 La Habra Golden Bear Arborists, Inc. $ 98,995.00 Monrovia West Coast Arborists, Inc. $105,524.00 Buena Park WHEREAS, the low bid by Atlas Environmental Services, Inc. is below the budgeted amount of $80,000.00 by $10,399.38 or 13% and said bid has been reviewed by staff who recommends awarding the contract to Atlas Environmental Services, Inc. who can produce an acceptable performance bond. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby accept said four bids and awards the contract for tree trimming services in the city of Chula Vista, California to Atlas Environmental Services, Inc. in the amount of $69,600.62. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract r and on behalf of the City of Chula vista. Pre"ented by ed ~ f0;J2 John P. Lippitt, Director of Bruce M. , city Public Works Attorney c: \rs\tree trill /0....3 ___" __ _~_'_'__'n____~"_________ ~_ ____._._____"_ _,'_u.__._..._._. - -- - -- +.-- . THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA OISCLOSlIRE STATEMENT You a~ muir~~ to tiI~ a SIaI~III~1II uf Disd\lSur~ of c~".ill oWllcrship or fillallcial illl~r~sts, p.YIII~II!S, or campaiVII cOlltrihuliolL', un all ma1h.'rs which will rl:\lllirc discrr.inuiuy al.:riun 011 Ihe p'lfl uf Ihe City Coundl, Pl;utlljll!~ CUlIlIUissioll, .11I4.1 ¡III otlll..'f oflki.ill hodil·S. The liJllowill!' illtÙnn.uiollll1USI I",' disduSI,.'d: I. Listlhe names of ¡,II persons Imving.1 tinalk:Î.d ¡meres. illlhe pmr__:rly whkh is till..' sul~i...'C:1 of Ihe élppJil.:.uioll 0' the ('Olllf:II:' . l·.~.. oWller. "pplicalll. ('olllr,\Clllr. SUhcOlllrdClor. millerial supplier. (}'t!Jò f",..,,, "'.^ ~ I S... 1:_<:. 2. If any person" identified purSuaDllo (I) above is a corporation or panœrship, list Ibe names of all individuals owning more !ban 1091 of Ibe shares in Ibe corporation or owning any partnership inleresl in Ibe pannership. AL Co \'- M. CCLse, ~ 1e ff r:>v- '^ h", ~. If allY person· ÎlJcllliticd purSU;UIIIU (I) ahoy.: is ntlll~I"Iruljt nrganiZHlioll ur a trust, list the;: IWltt's of auy persoll sc:rving a.'\ dil"L"\."lor tlf the IKIU-protir organization or as trusta: or hc:ndiciary ur trustur uf lilt: trust. f'J~ 4. Have you had more than $250 wonb of business Iransacled wilb any member of Ibe City staff, Boards, Commissions, Commillees. and Council wilbin Ibe past twelve monlb? Yes _ No X If yes, please indicate person(s): S. Please identify eacb and every perSOll, induding any agenlS, employees, coru.'UltanlS. or independenl Contrdctors who you bave assigned 10 represent you ""¡¡Ire dIe City in this mailer. ~~ 'L Y-. M- e o.,S,-.o _R"", G-I-'''''' / _b,~... (i)V I ..J ,,-f Ç- ,(J"....h'" 6. Hav~ you and/or your officers or agellls, in dIe agg~gale, .~lDlrihulc:d mo~ dtan $1,000 10 a Council mem""r in dIe current or precc:ding elc:clion perio~'! Yes _ No ~ If yes. _1310 which Council mc:mhers(s): Dale: 1-)..- C7-;- · · · (NOTE: Attached .dd1t~'~"Yji' . Signature of Contractorl Applicant ....tY. ~ J< /V1. C~ < .~ {;". $. Print or type lWIIe of Contrac r/Applicant · &tiJm. i.' defined 4': "Any individual, firm, co-portnership, joint venture, QSsocÚltion, social club, fraJe17/lJ1 organization, corporation, estate, trust, rueiver, syndicate, thi., t11Uf any other county, city or country, city municipaUty, district, or other poUtical subdivision, or any other group or combination acting 4' a unit. /tJ'1 13 --------_._- u,.._.....__ -.._.__.~-~__~_.__~._'__'___'. _ __···_··_~_____M. _~..___..__ File No. JY-046 ~~~ ~ r- - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - CllY OF CHUlA VISfA Contract Documents for: TREE TRIMMING SERVICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-1995 IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CA THIS IS A NON-PREVAILING WAGE PROJECT Itl- .5 ,-,,,. ."-,,,,." PART 3 BID ITEMS 3·7 ..AnnRJ!)~ SPECIES Q'P~'l'Y' ...I..~t~ ....'.. > '. 630 L St. Podocarpus 2 NW L St. & Fifth B. Pepper 2 410 L St. Bottlebrush 1 385 L St. B. Pepper 1 NE L St. & Country Club Small Eucalyptus 1 LSt. Small Eucalyptus 1 53 L St. Medium Eucalyptus 1 5 L St. Silk Oak 1 2.',,)'... ij¡û¡) ....... ... . it· ..<.. ...<..» >/>« ......... 11 L St. Brisbane Box 1 41 L St. Brisbane Box 1 51 L St. Brisbane Box 1 57 L St. Brisbane Box 2 68 L St. Brisbane Box 1 84 L St. Bottlebrush 1 122 L St. Brisbane Box 1 168 L St. Brisbane Box 1 180 L St. Brisbane Box 1 ~\V'.Y < .. , 861 Vista Way Medium Eucalyptus 1 > ..,."..> fiWi< >. '..... ........ ...... ... / .'... <.< ..'. .<... >< ..'. 10 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 3 16 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 1 17 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 1 22 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 2 23 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 2 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACTlTREE9495.026 33 /tJr ¿ _..___..._._._._.._.._._._.....____._n..__·.._.. ------_.._-.... H~.._..______·__·_·_·" -- ----.-. .,-----,--_.._------,-,--- Part 3, Bid Items ..... ·..·.·.i > i SPECIES QJJ~ 23 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 26 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 2 27 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 2 34 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 2 35 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 1 40 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 1 41 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 1 45 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 1 51 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 2 56 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 1 62 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 63 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 2 67 El Capitan Dr. B. Pepper 1 70 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 2 71 El Capitan Dr. Brisbane Box 1 .i < :Ji}~....~I!P...~gµ~..:D¥. 5 San Miguel Dr. Albizia 1 11 San Miguel Dr. Jacaranda 1 23 San Miguel Dr. Albizia 1 27 San Miguel Dr. Private 1 60 San Miguel Dr. Private 2 63 San Miguel Dr. Bottlebrush 1 66 San Miguel Dr. B. Pepper 1 71 San Miguel Dr. Bottlebrush 2 74 San Miguel Dr. Bottlebrush 1 81 San Miguel Dr. Private 1 91 San Miguel Dr. Private 1 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACTlTREE9495.026 34 I¿J~ ? - - - ---,.~--,_.. < --". -.--.---. -".- Part 3, Bid Items i» ..'..,.. SPECIES QIJ~ East·Sie1Tå.Way 11 Sierra Way Private 1 22 Sierra Way Private 1 28 Sierra Way Private 1 31 Sierra Way Private 1 34 Sierra Way Private 1 38 Sierra Way Private 1 43 Sierra Way Private 1 44 Sierra Way Maki 1 49 Sierra Way Private 1 56 Sierra Way Magnolia 3 67 Sierra Way Private 1 68 Sierra Way Private 1 74 Sierra Way Private 1 80 Sierra Way N. Z. Xmas 1 81 Sierra Way Bottlebrush 1 86 Sierra Way Bottlebrush 1 EåStPalótnårDn:ve .. 5 Palomar Bottlebrush 2 SE East Palomar & Hilltop Bottlebrush 2 SE East Palomar & Hilltop Orchid 1 16 Palomar Plum 1 21 Palomar Jacaranda 1 22 Palomar Bottlebrush 2 28 Palomar Bottlebrush 1 39 Palomar Bottlebrush 1 Magnolia 1 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACTlTREE9495.026 35 /O-z ........_.~.__.._-,-_..._, "--~-'--'-'-'-'-' ----.. ----_._-_._..._-,..,.~ --.----. Part 3, Bid ¡lema ADDRESS SPECIES QVAN1!ITY 40 Palomar Bottlebrush 2 57 Palomar Bottlebrush 1 74 Palomar Bottlebrush 1 80 Palomar Bottlebrush 1 81 Palomar B. Pepper 1 86 Palomar Bottlebrush 2 87 Palomar B. Pepper =.,....... .'. " > ....'.. .,. S.W. Cuyamaca & E. Palomar Bottlebrush 2 Dr. ···--.i>~ c..- ,.n;"". . ... .. ..... . ..... .' 886 Helix Ave. B. Pepper 1 894 Helix Ave. Bottlebrush 1 898 Helix Ave. Bottlebrush 1 MonseratéAvè. f 890 Monserate Ave. B. Pepper 1 893 Monserate Ave. Koelreuteria 1 887 Monserate Ave. Koelreuteria 1 879 Monserate Ave. Koelreuteria 2 878 Monserate Ave. Bottlebrush 1 ii i i i> ...... ..'.... tDj.. .,.,...> : ................... ..' > > ....' 111 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 117 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 118 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 123 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 124 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 129 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACT\TREE9495.026 36 /tJ~1 ----.----.....- --- - -"----. --- --_.~,_.- --~--,..,,"-_.,_.,.__.~--_. Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QlJ~ 130 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 135 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 2 136 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 142 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 143 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 147 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 148 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 153 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 158 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 159 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 164 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 165 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 3 170 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 2 176 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 177 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 182 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 188 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 189 El Capitan Dr. B. Pepper 2 192 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 2 193 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 197 EI Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 207 El Capitan Dr. Bottlebrush 1 N.E. EI Capitan & Monserate Bottlebrush 1 ...... / · ,Aye, ..',', , ^'''"..... .' 898 Myra Ave. Elm 1 897 Myra Ave. Podo 1 893 Myra Ave. Elm 1 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACT\TREE9495.026 37 /ð---/O ,. -.-......-,.-----------..---- ...... .....-.. ,-..-".-,---.----------.- ,--....-...---.-.--..----..- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTI'l'V 892 Myra Ave. Elm 1 889 Myra Ave. Elm 1 888 Myra Ave. Elm 2 883 Myra Ave. Elm 1 882 Myra Ave. Elm 1 Mana-Way / .. ... 898 Maria Way Elm 1 897 Maria Way Elm 1 894 Maria Way Elm 1 893 Maria Way Elm 1 889 Maria Way Elm 1 883 Maria Way Elm 1 2< / ..... .'.'. ,.....,.,.. .'. ..'.'.. 898 Melrose Ave. Elm 1 892 Melrose Ave. Elm 2 888 Melrose Ave. Elm 1 882 Melrose Ave. Elm 2 871 Melrose Ave. B. Pepper 1 S.E. Melrose & Tel. Cyn. Rd. Medium Eucalyptus 4 }\{1).a.uWå.Y ...'.. 314 Nolan Way Pear 1 320 Nolan Way Pear 1 Colorado Ave. 1017 Colorado Ave. Bottlebrush 1 Magnolia 1 1045 Colorado Ave. Elm 1 M:I..\ADMINICONTRACTITREE9495.026 38 j¿J É /1 ------- .----_.~---,_..,_..._._- -~..._--.- . - ------.- .._~..._~-_.._-~_._------- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES ".. Q{J~ 1071 Colorado Ave. Pear 1 1073 Colorado Ave. Jacaranda 1 1079 Colorado Ave. Bottlebrush 2 N.E. Colorado & Naples Jacaranda 2 .~..' L i.ii .', ...'. .'...... i 1015 Woodlawn Ave. B. Pepper 1 1052 Woodlawn Ave. Bottlebrush 2 1060 Woodlawn Ave. Ash 1 O"k1öwuAve. , , ',' 1010 Oaklawn Ave. . B. Pepper 1 1011 Oaklawn Ave. Cow Itch 1 1014 Oaklawn Ave. Eugenia 1 Myraporum 1 1017 Oaklawn Ave. B. Pepper 1 1018 Oaklawn Ave. Olive 1 1033 Oaklawn Ave. B. Pepper 3 1035 Oaklawn Ave. B. Pepper 1 1043 Oaklawn Ave. Orchid 1 Magnolia 1 1065 Oaklawn Ave. Maple 1 1070 Oaklawn Ave. Magnolia 1 1082 Oaklawn Ave. Kaifir Plum 2 Jeffé1'Øöh.Ãve. .... ... SE Jefferson & Moss Myraporum 1 1061 Jefferson Ave. Oleander 2 1085 Jefferson Ave. Oleander 1 Camphor 1 M:I..\ADMINICONTRACTITREE9495.026 39 /t9~/~ -~---,~.._...,- ---------- -- -------... - --- ,----~_._-,-,-,..._--_..- Part 3, Bid Items AQDRESS : SPECIES QUAN'PiTY 1090 Jefferson Ave. Pear 2 1095 Jefferson Ave. Myraporum 1 MamsohÄve. .. 1062 Madison Ave. Jacaranda 1 1081 Madison Ave. Camphor 2 i Li 1.( ) ....'.. i ... ..' i ....,.. 674 Crested Butte St. Pear 1 Oleander 1 Hibiscus 1 S.W. Crested Butte & Jefferson B. Pepper 1 S.E. Crested Butte & Jefferson Jacaranda 3 MóssSt. S.E. Moss & Oaklawn Elm 1 i L( i ...... 7 <i i //'......... ...... ,.,.,.,.... i 686 Naples St. Jacaranda 1 Bottlebrush 1 Moss St. 521 Moss St. Cal. Pepper 1 511 Moss St. Cal. Pepper 1 i.st. ..,. .... i.. i S.W. Wykes & Fifth B. Pepper 2 N.W. Wykes & Fifth Carob 1 Ntc1cmänst. ..... ..' 491 Nickman St. B. Pepper 3 486 Nickman St. Hackberry 1 485 Nickman St. B. Pepper 1 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACTlTREE9495.026 40 /tØ---- IJ ---- ---"-.--.--..-.-.-. . ------_.__..._---~--~.- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES Qt1AN't'ITY 480 Nickman St. B. Pepper 2 ·º¢~M't¢~vø. ...'.. " 1063 Del Mar Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 1091 Del Mar Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 ~Ì1.(\qtt¢µ~ø~ay .. .. 1078 Jacqueline Way Sweetgum 2 1074 Jacqueline Way Sweetgum 2 / "', ''''~', ....'.. 405 Moss St. Acacia 1 257 Moss St. Cal. Pepper 2 202 Moss St. . Camphor 1 150 Moss St. Pine 2 .-...,..".,.,.............., '. ..... . 251 Naples St. B. Pepper 2 N.W. Naples & Del Mar Ficifolia 1 S.E. Naples & Twin Oaks Cal. Pepper 1 N.W. Naples & Jacqueline Myraporum 1 135 Naples St. B. Pepper 3 121 Naples St. Myraporum 2 119 Naples St. Carrotwood 2 103 Naples St. Acacia 1 S.E. Naples St. & First Cal. Pepper 1 25 Naples St. Oak 8 East Nl;I.ple~t. 44 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 45 E. Naples St. Pine 1 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACT\TREE9495.026 41 /¿J~ /'/ H'~'_ ._~~--~---~-,~--~,- -, --.....~ Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES Q1.1A.lN1."fI'¥ ,..' 51 E. Naples St. Elm 1 55 E. Naples St. Pine 1 61 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 65 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 Ficus 1 70 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 78 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 89 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 86 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 95 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 94 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 103 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 119 E. Naples St. Podo 1 144 E. Naples St. Ficus 1 139 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 150 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 145 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 155 E. Naples St. Acacia 1 185 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 186 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 S.W. East Naples & Monserate B. Pepper 1 195 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 301 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 S.E. East Naples & Nolan B. Pepper 4 341 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 347 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 2 353 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 2 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACTlTREE9495.026 42 /IJ/,¿S --_._.__._._._~ --- Part 3, Bid Itema ADDRESS , SPECIES QIJAþI:J,'J,TY 367 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 371 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 379 E. Naples St. Ash 1 383 E. Naples St. Cal. Pepper 1 B. Pepper 2 391 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 399 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 2 N.E. East Naples & Osage Elm 1 431 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 435 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 451 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 455 E. Naples St. Cal. Pepper 1 461 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 481 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 486 E. Naples St. Koelreuteria 1 491 E. Naples St. B. Pepper 1 Emel'8ØhSt. 474 Emerson St. Ash 1 S.E. Emerson & Fifth B. Pepper 1 QUeeJtAtµie~~. ., 476 Queen Anne St. Cal. Pepper 1 Emerson St. 401 Emerson St. Cal. Pepper 1 B. Pepper 1 407 Emerson St. B. Pepper 2 414 Emerson St. Camphor 1 419 Emerson St. B. Pepper 1 M:I..\ADMINICONTRACTITREE9495.026 43 /c1-/¡' ----- --.-. -".--.-----" Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QIJANTlyy 425 Emerson St. B. Pepper 2 c,c.il..... .... µ"M:ar.... .. ........... 1112 Del Mar Ave. Cal. Pepper I 1114 Del Mar Ave. Cal. Pepper I Elm I 1150 Del Mar Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 1180 Del Mar Ave. Jacaranda I 1193 Del Mar Ave. Cal. Pepper I Twl..··O.sA1ie. .... 1143 Twin Oaks Ave. Cal. Pepper I 1160 Twin Oaks Ave. B. Pepper I Séœrid<Ave; .. 1112 Second Ave. B. Pepper 2 1111 Second Ave. Silk Oak I IllS Second Ave. Silk Oak 2 1134 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper I 1169 Second Ave. Silk Oak I 1172 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper I 1180 Second Ave. Pittosporum I Eli1IAve. S.W. Elm & Naples Cal. Pepper 2 1112 Elm Ave. B. Pepper I 1125 Elm Ave. B. Pepper I 1129 Elm Ave. Jacaranda I B. Pepper I 1146 Elm Ave. Bottiebrush I M:I..IADMlNICONTRACI'lTREE949S.026 44 /ð-/7 ,--.---- ...------- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS .... SPECIES QUAN'I,TI'Y' S.E. Elm & Emerson Elm 1 Cal. Pepper 1 .A1pinø",,~e. ...... S.W. Alpine & Emerson Cal. Pepper 3 1164 Alpine Ave. Jacaranda 1 <;,« '.... ...'.'.. « !'c'~f < ....... < 1139 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 1156 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 1157 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 1169 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 3 1188 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 1194 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 ......... lir~ < > 1103 Dixon Dr. B. Pepper 1 1171 Dixon Dr. B. Pepper 1 "'L ..,...< <¿¿ ......<>< < « N.E. Emerson & Second Cal. Pepper 1 180 Emerson St. Cal. Pepper 1 N.W. Emerson & Elm Bottiebrush 2 163 Emerson St. Camphor 1 137 Emerson St. Cal. Pepper 1 ..;..,.,.:...:......'.:.;.::: "',' VI!n~WªY ..'.. 1102 Vista Way Orchid 1 1108 Vista Way Orchid 1 1118 Vista Way Orchid 1 1126 Vista Way Orchid 1 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACT\TREE9495.026 45 /¿J-¡r- --- - --"~._._...~ Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES Q'PA.NTI'I'Y 1136 Vista Way Orchid 1 1137 Vista Way Orchid 1 1143 Vista Way Podocarpus , 1 &,.... ,,,... S.E. Agua Tibia & E. Emerson Podocarpus 1 S.W. Agua Tibia & E. Emerson Alder 1 1160 Agua Tibia Pear 2 1166 Agua Tibia Pear 1 1173 Agua Tibia Pear 2 1179 Agua Tibia Pear 1 1196 Agua Tibia B. Pepper 2 Elm 1 Q9YJlmaçø-,t\,Y!i\. 1109 Cuyamaca Ave. Brisbane Box 1 1115 Cuyamaca Ave. Brisbane Box 1 S.W. Cuyamaca Ave. & East Podocarpus 1 Emerson 1160 Cuyamaca Ave. Private 2 1167 Cuyamaca Ave. B. Pepper 2 1172 Cuyamaca Ave. Pittosporum 1 1173 Cuyamaca Ave. Brisbane Box 1 1174 CuyamacaAve. Private 1 1190 Cuyamaca Ave. Private 1 Pine 1 1191 Cuyamaca Ave. Elm 1 Helix: Ave. 1120 Helix Ave. Jacaranda 1 M:I..\ADMIN\CONTRACTITREE9495.026 46 /IJ---/i _.~-"_.- - ,_.. _.~".__.. _..___u....__ Part 3, Bid Items .. çt.....IJII'I'Y' ~ < SPECIES 1120 Helix Ave. N.Z. Xmas 1 N.E. Helix & Leanna N.Z. Xmas 2 1130 Helix Ave. B. Pepper 1 1134 Helix Ave. N.Z. Xmas 1 N.W. Helix & E. Emerson Pear 1 .."<..'.'.. S".>« .. ..... ..,. t< . < . < ..... < 69 Leanna St. Podocarpus 1 70 Leanna St. MaId 1 74 Leanna St. Podocarpus 1 82 Leanna St. MaId 1 83 Leanna St. MaId 1 95 Leanna St. Podocarpus 1 ...,' "7 ...... Ea.tEmerøri St. ... N.E. East Emerson & Hilltop B. Pepper 2 Dr. 55 East Emerson St. B. Pepper 1 71 East Emerson St. Pear 2 74 East Emerson St. B. Pepper 1 73 East Emerson St. Pear 1 77 East Emerson St. Podo 1 81 East Emerson St. Podo 1 84 East Emerson St. Podo 1 86 East Emerson St. Pear 1 85 East 'Emerson St. B. Pepper 1 87 East Emerson St. Pear 1 90 East Emerson St. Pear 1 92 East Emerson St. Pear 1 M:I..IADMINlCONTRACIìTRBE949S.026 47 / ¿J --- e2CJ ---------..--- _._---,,_.~._------ Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS ...... SPECIES Qt.J~ 94 East Emerson St. B. Pepper 1 93 East Emerson St. H. Pepper 1 96 East Emerson St. Pear 1 181 East Emerson St. Pear 1 185 East Emerson St. , Pear 2 191 East Emerson St. Pear 1 190 East Emerson St. Oleander 3 195 East Emerson St. Podo 1 East·,.Qµø~*.Apijø..·Dr. <, . .<i 73 E. Queen Anne Dr. B. Pepper 1 75 E. Queen Anne Dr. Podo 2 84 E. Queen Anne Dr. B. Pepper 1 88 E. Queen Anne Dr. Podo 1 87 E. Queen Anne Dr. Carrotwood 1 89 E. Queen Anne Dr. Podo 1 91 E. Queen Anne Dr. B. Pepper 1 103 E. Queen Anne Dr. B. Pepper 1 107 E. Queen Anne Dr. B. Pepper 1 108 E. Queen Anne Dr. B. Pepper 1 120 E. Queen Anne Dr. Pear 1 126 E. Queen Anne Dr. B. Pepper 1 144 E. Queen Anne Dr. Podo 1 152 E. Queen Anne Dr. Podo 1 166 E. Queen Anne Dr. Podo 1 183 E. Queen Anne Dr. Brisbane Box 1 184 E. Queen Anne Dr. Podo 1 190 E. Queen Anne Dr. Podo 1 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACTlTREE9495.026 48 /¿)~ 2) ^_____o..__. -_._~._~-_._.~~------------- Part 3, Bid Items , ....... ...'. SPECIES '....,..«« .,...,. . Q.VA.NTITY' 196 E. Queen Anne Dr. Podo 1 Theresa ... Way . 185 Theresa Way Bottlebrush 2 181 Theresa Way Bottlebrush 3 N. W. Theresa Way & E. Bottlebrush I Emerson N.W. Theresa & E. Queen Anne Bottlebrush 3 Dr. I"C... .. .......'... .....,'. ..',' ....< <....."'. .............. ........,. ., ....... .. .....,.,....,.« ....',........, 1190 Myra Ave. B. Pepper 2 1183 Myra Ave. Private 1 1177 Myra Ave. Jacaranda I N.E. Myra & E. Oxford Albizia 4 "" ,.. ......... ~". ..'...... ...... ..',. .. 206 E. Emerson St. Myraporum 1 210 E. Emerson St. Pear 1 .. ...;"" .... ......'.. < 1129 Monserate Ave. Koelreuteria 1 S.W. Monserate & Theresa Bottlebrush 1 N.E. Monserate & Emerson Ficifolia 2 1191 Monserate Ave. Bottlebrush 2 <.:.... ·<"i .....'. ..',.. ....'. < . AViIII, < ..< .. ...,... .....'.,. .... .....,...< 1100 Melrose Ave. Camphor 1 1116 Melrose Ave. Camphor 1 1132 Melrose Ave. Camphor 1 1146 Melrose Ave. Camphor 1 1162 Melrose Ave. Pittosporum 1 M:\.. \ADMINlCONTRACJ'\TRBE9495.026 49 )~ ~ .;2. ~ .."." ,...~-,--,-,- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS ... SPECIES QUANTITY 1167 Melrose Ave. Camphor I 1173 Melrose Ave. Ash I 1197 Melrose Ave. B. Pepper I Ch.rylPla~e 267 Cheryl Place Carrotwood I 274 Cheryl Place Carrotwood I 279 Cheryl Place Carrotwood I Q'ågeAVIi!. 1100 Block, West Side B. Pepper 18 Myraporum I Ash I 1103 Osage Ave. Elm 1 1107 Osage Ave. Private I 1171 Osage Ave. B. Pepper 1 1177 Osage Ave. B. Pepper I 1181 Osage Ave. B. Pepper 1 Ocala:Äve. 1102 Ocala Ave. Pine 1 1116 Ocala Ave. B. Pepper I lI22 Ocala Ave. Magnolia I lI26 Ocala Ave. B. Pepper I 1132 Ocala Ave. Koelreuteria 1 lI33 Ocala Ave. Magnolia 1 1150 Ocala Ave. Koelreuteria I lI51 Ocala Ave. Koelreuteria I 1153 Ocala Ave. Bottlebrush 2 1160 Ocala Ave. Koelreuteria 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRAC1ìTREB9495.026 50 /¡'),c2J ____.__.._,__._~__ __ _.__.___ _. - _____u --"-- .._---------- -.---.-.-..........---....."-..- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES. .... QQANJ..-J'Y' 1170 Ocala Ave. Bottlebrush 2 1176 Ocala Ave. Koelreuteria 1 Ave. 1103 Oasis Ave. Koelreuteria 1 1108 Oasis Ave. Elm 2 1122 Oasis Ave. Olive 1 1128 Oasis Ave. B. Pepper 1 1129 Oasis Ave. Koelreuteria 1 1132 Oasis Ave. Koelreuteria 1 1142 Oasis Ave. Koelreuteria 1 1147 Oasis Ave. Magnolia 1 1148 Oasis Ave. Koelreuteria 1 1152 Oasis Ave. Pine 1 1158 Oasis Ave. Koelreuteria 1 1162 Oasis Ave. Magnolia 1 1173 Oasis Ave. B. Pepper 1 1188 Oasis Ave. Koelreuteria 1 Nanette St. 491 Nanette St. B. Pepper 1 OteløtA\'e. 1125 Ocelot Ave. Bottlebrush 1 1129 Ocelot Ave. Koelreuteria 1 1138 Ocelot Ave. Koelreuteria 2 1147 Ocelot Ave. Magnolia 1 1151 Ocelot Ave. Liquidambar 1 1156 Ocelot Ave. Camphor 2 1157 Ocelot Ave. Podo I M:I..IADMJNICONTRACflTREE9495.026 51 /¿J~cJ.f ~_~____,"'·M"____~_._ .,~.w _._,__ .___'.....n ..--,....-..---,...------- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUAN't'lTY 1162 Ocelot Ave. Ficus 1 1163 Ocelot Ave. Carrotwood 3 1173 Ocelot Ave. B. Pepper 1 1179 Ocelot Ave. Magnolia 2 1182 Ocelot Ave. Koelreuteria 1 1183 Ocelot Ave. B. Pepper 1 OleandêrAve. ... 1100 Oleander Ave. B. Pepper 1 1106 Oleander Ave. B. Pepper 1 1142 Oleander Ave. Koelreuteria 1 1148 Oleander Ave. Camphor 2 Pine 1 S.W. Oleander & E. Oxford Kaifir Plum 2 1100 Block East Side Carob 16 EaSt Oxfot'd St. 422 E. Oxford St. B. Pepper 1 426 E. Oxford St. Brisbane Box 1 428 E. Oxford St. Brisbane Box 1 434 E. Oxford St. Brisbane Box 1 , 444 E. Oxford St. Brisbane Box 2 464 E. Oxford St. Brisbane Box 1 463 E. Oxford St. Myraporum 2 Koelreuteria 2 467 E. Oxford St. Koelreuteria 1 478 E. Oxford St. Brisbane Box 1 484 E. Oxford St. Koelreuteria 1 487 E. Oxford St. Brisbane Box 1 ........... M:\..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 52 /,?J r;¿~ - ------------...-.- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUA.N.....ry 488 E. Oxford SI. Brisbane Box 2 493 E. Oxford SI. Brisbane Box 1 494 E. Oxford SI. Koelreuteria 1 498 E. Oxford SI. Kaifir Plum I ..... ..... ~~< ..... 353 Oxford SI. B. Pepper 2 330 Oxford SI. Medium Eucalyptus 7 325 Oxford SI. Medium Eucalyptus I N.W. Oxford & Third Small Eucalyptus 2 Medium Eucalyptus I 230 Oxford SI. CaI. Pepper 1 222 Oxford St. Acacia 1 ust<OxtôrdSì. N.E. East Oxford & Cuyamaca Bottlebrush 1 N.W. East Oxford & Nile Brisbane Box 1 OI',eu>St. 445 Orsett SI. B. Pepper 1 433 Orsett SI. Carrotwood 1 OrdVlewCt. N.W.Ord View & Orsett Carrotwood 1 1254 Ord View Ct. Carrotwood 1 FòurdrAve. '. 1227 Fourth Ave. B. Pepper 2 1272 Fourth Ave. CaI. Pepper 2 I(~""edy >~~~ ,.'. ..',.. ...... S. W. Kennedy SI. & Second B. Pepper 2 M:\..IADMINICONTRACflTREE9495.026 53 /¿J - 2? ------_._- .------..-..- -----~_..- _..-.----"."._....~-~-~--- Part 3, Bid Items : SPECIES QUANTITY Second Ave. 1217 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 Acacia I=tm Av.. 1227 First Ave. Maple 1 Walnut 1 1251 First Ave. Ash 1 .... - . 1202 Helix Ave. N. Z. Xmas 1 1212 Helix Ave. B. Pepper 1 . A._~. , 1279 Cuyamaca Ave. Plum 1 Brisbane Box 1 1278 Cuyamaca Ave. Melaleuca 2 1279 Cuyamaca Ave. Ash 2 1268 Cuyamaca Ave. Jacaranda 1 u_ ~ ......A ....' 1265 Helix Ave. Brisbane Box 1 1264 Helix Ave. Koelreuteria 1 - . Av.._ S.W. Josselyn & E. Oxford B. Pepper 1 1207 Josselyn Ave. B. Pepper 1 Pine 1 1211 Josselyn Ave. B. Pepper 1 1222 Josselyn Ave. B. Pepper 1 1228 Josselyn Ave. B. Pepper 1 M:\.. \ADMIN\CONTRACI'\TREB9495.026 54 jtJr.2? ----.-...-----" -- ----.-..-----.- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS 1 SPECIES QUANTITY 1234 Josselyn Ave. Myraporum 1 1263 Josselyn Ave. Liquidambar 2 1273 Josselyn Ave. Olive 1 1272 Josselyn Ave. Podo 1 1283 Josselyn Ave. Koelreuteria 1 ........ i .'... ~""..7i .,. > 1216 Judson Way Silk Oak 1 N.E. Judson & E. Oneida B. Pepper 1 1250 Judson Way B. Pepper 1 1284 Judson Way B. Pepper 1 1288 Judson Way , B. Pepper 1 1296 Judson Way Koelreuteria 1 «,.&;.....i .....' .......... .'.. ,< ..,'.. ..,... ·.i··,.· i.. < .< .', ........ 111 E. Olympia St. B. Pepper 1 118 E. Olympia St. B. Pepper 1 122 E. Olympia St. Pear 1 127 E. Olympia St. Crepe Myrtle 1 128 E. Olympia St. B. Pepper 1 132 E. Olympia St. B. Pepper 2 138 E. Olympia St. B. Pepper 1 157 E. Olympia St. B. Pepper 1 Pine 1 161 E. Olympia St. Pine 1 B. Pepper 1 168 E. Olympia St. B. Pepper 1 172 E. Olympia St. B. Pepper I 203 E. Olympia St. Ash 2 M:\.. \ADMIN\CONTRACIìTREE9495.026 55 /¡Jr~g/ -.. - ....--._"..... Part 3, Bid Items -, AÞDkESS , SPECIES QUANTITY 207 E. Olympia St. Ash 1 235 E. Olympia St. B. Pepper 1 EastOneldâ>St. N.E. East Oneida & Josselyn B. Pepper S.W. East Oneida & Judson B. Pepper 2 108 E. Oneida St. B. Pepper 1 III E. Oneida St. B. Pepper 1 112 E. Oneida St. B. Pepper 1 141 E. Oneida St. B. Pepper 1 142 E. Oneida St. B. Pepper 1 148 E. Oneida St. B. Pepper 1 152 E. Oneida St. B. Pepper 1 157 E. Oneida St. B. Pepper 1 167 E. Oneida St. B. Pepper 1 168 E. Oneida St. B. Pepper I 172 E. Oneida St. Koelreuteria 1 218 E. Oneida St. Ash 1 227 E. Oneida St. Ash 1 243 E. Oneida St. Koelreuteria 1 EåstOtlåriclOSc. 107 E. Orlando St. Ash 1 112 E. Orlando St. Koelreuteria 1 118 E. Orlando St. Koelreuteria 1 I! Magnolia 1 128 E. Orlando St. Koelreuteria 1 141 E. Orlando St. ! Bottlebrush I -' 142 E. Orlando St. Elm 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTRBE9495.026 56 /¡}/..< / Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS .,.. SPECIES Q'UAN'l'ITY Magnolia 1 148 E. Orlando St. Koelreuteria 1 151 E. Orlando St. B. Pepper 3 152 E. Orlando St. Ficifolia 1 162 E. Orlando St. Koelreuteria 3 172 E. Orlando St. Koelreuteria 1 208 E. Orlando St. Koelreuteria 1 218 E. Orlando St. BotUebrush 1 221 E. Orlando St. Mulberry 1 246 E. Orlando St. Ash 1 247 E. Orlando St. Olive 1 .,..., i.", .< , ... N.W. Monserate & E. Olympia Elm 1 B. Pepper 1 Pear 1 S.W. Monserate & E. Olympia B. Pepper 1 N.E. Monserate & E. Orlando B. Pepper 2 S.W. Monserate & E. Orlando Koelreuteria 1 MøJ:tØseAve; .,' 1217 Melrose Ave. Pittosporum 1 1211 Melrose Ave. B. Pepper 1 1127 Melrose Ave. B. Pepper 1 S.W. Melrose & E. Olympia B. Pepper 2 N.W. Melrose & E. Orlando Olive 1 1279 Melrose Ave. B. Pepper 1 S.W. Melrose & E. Orlando B. Pepper 3 M:\..\ADMIN\CONTRACT\TREE9495.026 57 j¿jJ- 30 -- ~ ,. ----......-..------------.. Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY , M9l).W~Y~V~. 1203 Monterey Ave. Pear 1 1206 Monterey Ave. B. Pepper 2 1207 Monterey Ave. Pear 1 1220 Monterey Ave. Pear 1 1221 Monterey Ave. Pear 1 1226 Monterey Ave. Pear 1 1227 Monterey Ave. Pear 1 1240 Monterey Ave. B. Pepper 1 1245 Monterey Ave. Pear 1 :N'øP~~Pl'· 1217 Neptune Dr. Bottlebrush 1 E8$tOnèidâS~ 270 E. Oneida St. Myraporum 1 E8$tPaloD.arSt. 4 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 2 20 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 48 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 54 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 55 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 60 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 66 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 70 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 71 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 80 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 81 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 M:I..\ADMlNICONTRACTITREE9495.026 58 J¡}--Y/ . .,-.,.'".. ..---.-.--,---....------ Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES .. QUANTITY 84 E. Palomar 81. B. Pepper 1 90 E. Palomar St. B. Pepper 1 91 E. Palomar 81. Ficus 1 Elm 1 96 E. Palomar 81. Peppermint 1 B. Pepper 3 102 E. Palomar 81. Koelreuteria 1 103 E. Palomar 81. Cal. Pepper 1 108 E. Palomar 81. Myrapodum 3 112 E. Palomar 81. Koelreuteria 1 138 E. Palomar 81. B. Pepper 1 161 E. Palomar 81. B. Pepper 2 167 E. Palomar 81. Elm 1 212 E. Palomar 81. B. Pepper 1 237 E. Palomar St. Elm 1 246 E. Palomar 81. Ash 1 247 E. Palomar 81. Elm 1 8.E. East Palomar & Melrose B. Pine 3 School (south side) B. Pepper 6 Church (north side) Bottlebrush 3 B. Pepper 1 fifth Ave. . 44 Fifth Ave. Carob 2 S.W. Fifth & McIntosh B. Pepper 2 68 Fifth Ave. Carob 2 85 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 88 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 M:I..IADMINlCONTRACflTREE9495.026 59 /¡)~ J:2- ------- -------- Part 3, Bid Items ......' \< SPECIES QUANTJ'J'Y' 97 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 3 Olive 1 106 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 115 Fifth Ave. Oleander 1 129 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper I 133 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 137 Fifth Ave. Elm 1 138 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 Cal. Pepper 1 139 Fifth Ave. Elm 1 Jacaranda 1 N.W. Fifth & Flower Acacia 1 N.E. Fifth & Flower Olive 2 S.E. Fifth & Flower Camphor 1 160 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 161 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 164 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 165 Fifth Ave. Podo 1 171 Fifth Ave. Podo 1 172 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 188 Fifth Ave. Cat. Pepper 1 Pine 1 206 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 212 Fifth Ave. Cat. Pepper 1 223 Fifth Ave. Podo 1 230 Fifth Ave. Podo 1 234 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRAC1ìTREE9495.026 60 /¿J- ;J;J --_..,._.,,-~,,-_._--,.. _.__._,~.__. Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY 235 Fifth Ave. Podo 1 239 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 240 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 246 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 252 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 S.E. Fifth & Davidson B. Pepper 1 260 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 265 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 269 Fifth Ave. Elm 2 274 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 278 Fifth Ave. Olive 2 280 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 281 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 Cal. Pepper 1 N.E. Fifth & F St. Bottlebrush 2 303 Fifth Ave. Elm 1 B. Pepper 1 305 Fifth Ave. Elm 1 S.E. Fifth & Center Cal. Pepper 2 Medium Eucalyptus 2 364 Fifth Ave. Carob 3 Orchid 1 388 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 390 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 S.W. Fifth & G (School) Cal. Pepper 1 Olive 1 615 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 M:I..IADMINICONTRAC1\TREE9495.026 61 If), :> f - ------------ __ __n________ ___._~_.__.__._ Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY 608 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 614 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 620 Fifth Ave. Olive 1 623 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 640 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 644 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 643 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 647 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 657 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 2 658 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 663 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 670 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 2 673 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 667 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 84 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 683 Fifth Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 B. Pepper 1 688 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 689 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 N.W. Fifth & J 51. Cal. Pepper 1 695 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 701 Fifth Ave. Ca!. Pepper 2 707 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 712 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 715 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 720 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 725 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRAC1ìTREE9495.026 62 /¿}<]~ --..-...".-.-.--."- -- ----------- ---...----"---- .-..- ---.-..---..-' - -,.,-.-.,.----------- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY 729 Fifth Ave. R Pepper 1 730 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 735 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 736 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 750 Fifth Ave. R Pepper 1 746 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 750 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 757 Fifth Ave. Myraporum 1 Cal. Pepper 1 760 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 3 763 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 766 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 767 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 Ca!. Pepper 1 772 Fifth Ave. R Pepper 1 776 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 777 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 782 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 3 783 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 Cal. Pepper 1 786 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 792 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 798 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 822 Fifth Ave. Carob 1 828 Fifth Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 844 Fifth Ave. Carob 1 856 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 63 /¡)~ J /- ______..._.'_..____ _______n__'._ --------~---,._. ________m__ _ _ U_ "0__'0'0_" ..._n__..___ Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY 862 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 868 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 874 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 800 Fifth Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 B. Pepper 2 886 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 Cal. Pepper 1 892 Fifth Ave. B. Pepper 2 Cal. Pepper 1 Second . Ave. 10 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 3 20 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 25 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 33 Second Ave. Pine 1 39 Second Ave. Pine 1 46 Second Ave. Olive 1 67 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 81 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 83 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 88 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 Olive 1 94 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 Silk Oak 1 101 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 103 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 121 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 130 Second Ave. Camphor 2 M:I..IADMINICONTRAC1ìTREE9495.026 64 /ð~57 - _".__._._.... ____u.u_ m_...'_'_ __ ______.. _ - -----~.- . -.--.--- - ----.---.-...- . Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS , SPECIES QUANTITY 134 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 138 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 145 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 149 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 155 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 160 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 164 Second Ave. Ash 2 168 Second Ave. Mulberry 2 167 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 175 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 176 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 183 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 3 180 Second Ave. Jacaranda 2 185 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 186 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 204 Second Ave. B. Pepper 3 217 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 216 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 220 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 221 Second Ave. Myraporum 3 225 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 238 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 244 Second Ave. B. Pepper 3 247 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 N.E. Second & Montebello B. Pepper 3 280 Second Ave. B. Pepper 2 290 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 65 It)o'3Y -_._--,,_._---_..-._._.._.~._---------_.- --------".-- -- -- -~-- ----"---- _."."__,"". ".~ m_._._.._.___.__ Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY 287 Second Ave. Elm 2 293 Second Ave. Elm 2 S.W. Second & F St. Cal. Pepper 1 305 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 322 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 329 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 Olive 1 334 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 338 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 342 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 N.W. Second & Cypress Oak 1 N.E. Second & Cypress Cal. Pepper 1 S. W. Second & Cypress Cal. Pepper I 371 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 3 385 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 S.W. Second & Madrona Cal. Pepper 1 N.W. Second & G St. Cal. Pepper 1 S.W. Second & G St. Cal. Pepper 3 403 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 421 Second Ave. Elm 3 422 Second Ave. Jacaranda 1 459 Second Ave. Elm 2 Carrotwood 1 478 Second Ave. Carrotwood 4 476 Second Ave. Carrotwood 2 S.E. Second & H St. Podo 2 514 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 66 /¿J <JJ __~.__...nm___'_' ,_,'.. - --~"_.- -- ------. -~~-,----_.._------ Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES Q....ANTITY 515 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 535 Second Ave. Carrotwood 1 540 Second Ave. Camphor 2 546 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 547 Second Ave. Olive 1 553 Second Ave. Podo 2 572 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 575 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 581 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 2 585 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 591 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 Ca!. Pepper 1 N.W. Second & I St. B. Pepper 1 N.W. Second & I St. Ca!. Pepper 2 N.E. Second & I St. Carrotwood 2 600 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 2 601 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 2 605 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 610 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 2 613 Second Ave. B. Pepper 3 644 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 S.E. Second & Ha!sey Ca!. Pepper 1 646 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 647 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 656 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 657 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 3 660 Second Ave. Ca!. Pepper 2 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 ' 67 /¿J~';t7 .._~ .- .",--.-.--..---.,-- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY 676 Second Ave. Ca\. Pepper 1 681 Second Ave. Ca\. Pepper 2 682 Second Ave. Ca\. Pepper I B. Pepper 1 685 Second Ave. Cat. Pepper 1 N.W. Second & J St. Cat. Pepper 1 697 Second Ave. Jacaranda 2 700 Second Ave. cat. Pepper 1 706 Second Ave. Cat. Pepper 2 712 Second Ave. Ca\. Pepper 1 715 Second Ave. Cat. Pepper 1 714 Second Ave. Ca\. Pepper 1 717 Second Ave. Ca\. Pepper 2 720 Second Ave. Ca\. Pepper 1 723 Second Ave. Magnolia 1 726 Second Ave. Cat. Pepper 1 730 Second Ave. Ca\. Pepper 1 733 Second Ave. Carob 2 740 Second Ave. Ficus 1 Ca\. Pepper 1 745 Second Ave. Podo 1 744 Second Ave. Cat. Pepper 1 751 Second Ave. ' B. Pepper 2 756 Second Ave. B. Pepper 1 761 Second Ave. B. Pepper 2 757 Second Ave. Ca\. Pepper 1 782 Second Ave. Cat. Pepper 2 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 68 / j) ~'I/ -~.,-----".._".-- --~-_._- _....._-~ -. ----.---- ~-"~'"---"'- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY 789 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 804 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper I 818 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 N.W. Second & San Miguel Pine 1 843 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 847 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 853 Second Ave. Cal. Pepper , 1 S.W. Second & Sierra Way B. Pepper 2 873 Second Ave. B. Pepper 2 883 Second Ave. B. Pepper 2 First Ave. S.E. First & Flower Camphor 13 181 First Ave. Liquidamber 3 193 First Ave. Cal. Pepper I 201 First Ave. Cal. Pepper I 218 First Ave. Magnolia I 232 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 238 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 242 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 248 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 256 First Ave. Orchid 2 266 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 272 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 276 First Ave. Cal. Pepper I 286 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 287 First Ave. Cal. Pepper I 290 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRAC1ìTREE9495.026 69 JfJ/J/;2- -~---,._-----_.._- ~-- .- - -.-.---. Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUA......ITY 303 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 S.W. First & F St. Cal. Pepper 1 310 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 316 First Ave. Magnolia 1 Cal. Pepper 1 332 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 338 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 2 345 First Ave. Camphor 1 350 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 356 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 367 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 372 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 377 First Ave. Large Eucalyptus 1 Cal. Pepper 1 389 First Ave. B. Pepper 1 395 First Ave. Carob 2 420 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 441 First Ave. Cal. Pepper 1 N.W. First & Alvarado Pittosporum 1 467 First Ave. Magnolia 1 470 First Ave. Acacia 1 475 First Ave. Silk Oak. 2 479 First Ave. Jacaranda 2 484 First Ave. B. Pepper 3 485 First Ave. Silk Oak. 2 N.W. First & H St. Cal. Pepper 1 523 First Ave. Jacaranda 3 M:I..IADMINICONTRACflTREE9495.026 70 j()/ t/} ^-_.".~--- - -- -.---.......,..-.-- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QI.IA.......ITY S.W. First & Shasta B. Pepper 2 536 First Ave. Jacaranda 2 542 First Ave. B. Pepper 2 543 First Ave. B. Pepper 3 546 First Ave. B. Pepper 1 552 First Ave. B. Pepper 1 560 First Ave. B. Pepper 2 566 First Ave. B. Pepper 1 567 First Ave. B. Pepper 4 569 First Ave. Elm 2 576 First Ave. Elm 2 571 First Ave. Ca!. Pepper I 580 First Ave. Elm I BottIebrush 2 583 First Ave. Ash 2 617 First Ave. Jacaranda 1 621 First Ave. Elm 1 632 First Ave. B. Pepper 2 Brisbane Box 1 635 First Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 S.W. First & Halsey CaI. Pepper 1 653 First Ave. Magnolia 2 N.W. First & Murray Ca!. Pepper 1 664 First Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 669 First Ave. B. Pepper 3 670 First Ave. CaI. Pepper 1 680 First Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 71 /tÎ/I'I -..._- -- --- - ~_..- ....~-_..- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY S.E. First & King B. Pepper 3 684 First Ave. Ca!. Pepper 2 695 First Ave. B. Pepper 2 N.W. First & J St. Ca!. Pepper 2 712 First Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 726 First Ave. Elm I B. Pepper I 735 First Ave. Ca!. Pepper 3 749 First Ave. Ca!. Pepper 1 753 First Ave. Ca!. Pepper I B. Pepper 1 S.E. First & Country Club B. Pepper 2 345 First Ave. Camphor 2 851 First Ave. Elm 2 891 First Ave. Large Eucalyptus 2 891 First Ave. Medium Eucalyptus 1 HIII«QþDr. 309 Hilltop Dr. Ca!. Pepper 4 312 Hilltop Dr. Olive 2 314 Hilltop Dr. Olive 2 324 Hilltop Dr. Olive 2 317 Hilltop Dr. Ca!. Pepper 2 N. W. Hilltop & Center Olive 2 344 Hilltop Dr. Olive 5 362 Hilltop Dr. Cal. Pepper 3 368 Hilltop Dr. Ca!. Pepper 3 410 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 72 /¡)/tj~ ___.__..___.._____.._.m_ -'... . ----..- ..- --~- -- Part 3, Bid Itema ADDRESS SPECIES Q{JAN',flTY 414 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 420 Hilltop Dr. Ash 2 426 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 456 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 Cal. Pepper 1 460 Hilltop Dr. Elm 2 534 Hilltop Dr. Cal. Pepper 2 537 Hilltop Dr. Private 1 548 Hilltop Dr. Cal. Pepper 1 567 Hilltop Dr. Bottlebrush 4 571 Hilltop Dr. Silk Oak 1 600 Hilltop Dr. Cal. Pepper 1 612 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 618 Hilltop Dr. Cal. Pepper 1 622 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 621 Hilltop Dr. Cal. Pepper 1 626 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 2 667 Hilltop Dr. Jacaranda 1 671 Hilltop Dr. Myraporum 3 N.E. Hilltop & J St. B. Pepper 1 712 Hilltop Dr. Cal. Pepper 1 795 Hilltop Dr. Podocarpus 2 810 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 2 S.E. Hilltop & El Capitan Podocarpus 1 B. Pepper 1 N.W. Hilltop & San Miguel Medium Eucalyptus 1 Small Eucalyptus 4 M:I..\ADMIN\CONTRACTITREE9495.026 73 If) /2jf ,._._--,.....,'^_.__.."._~----_.. Part 3, Bid items ADDRESS . SPECIES QUANTITY . S.E. Hilltop & E. Sierra Magnolia 2 Pine 1 N.W. Hilltop & Palomar B. Pepper 1 N.W. Hilltop & L St. Silk Oak 1 921 Hilltop Dr. Elm 1 953 Hilltop Dr. Sycamore 1 963 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 967 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 997 Hilltop Dr. Sycamore 1 1003 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 1011 Hilltop Dr. B. Pepper 1 1063 Hilltop Dr. Sycamore 1 1073 Hilltop Dr. Cal. Pepper 1 B. Pepper 1 1083 Hilltop Dr. Cal. Pepper 1 Teie,..aphc.ÞYøn Rd. . Center Island Between Crest & Small Eucalyptus 104 Buena Vista North side between Medical Small Eucalyptus 11 Center & Paseo Ladera North side between Crest & Small Eucalyptus 13 Paseo Del Rey Crest & Paseo Del Rey Small Eucalyptus 13 . ~ Kin,SWood·· .·Dt.. 7 Kingswood Dr. Medium Eucalyptus 1 9 Kingswood Dr. Medium Eucalyptus 1 33 Kingswood Dr. Medium Eucalyptus 1 49 Kingswood Dr. Medium Eucalyptus I M:I..IADMINICONTRACT\TRBE9495.026 74 /jJrl? --,.- __._--'0'0- Part 3, Bid Items ADDRESS SPECIES QUANTITY 50 Kingswood Dr. Small Eucalyptus I Sherwood St. 53 Sherwood St. Small Eucalyptus I 79 Sherwood St. Medium Eucalyptus I 84 Sherwood St. Medium Eucalyptus I 85 Sherwood St. Medium Eucalyptus 1 87 Sherwood St. Small Eucalyptus I 90 Sherwood St. Medium Eucalyptus I 91 Sherwood St. Medium Eucalyptus I Blshc»pSt. 50 Bishop St. Medium Eucalyptus I 56 Bishop St. Medium Eucalyptus ,..,- 1St. North side between Broadway & Medium Eucalyptus I Fifth Large Eucalyptus 3 M:\.. \ADMIN\CONTRACTlTREE9495.026 75 /~/I~ ___M__.~__·_·'" ._...__". - .---....-- ------ Part 4 - Location of Palms PART 4 LOCATION OF PALMS BID ITEM 1 BID· ITEM 2 ADDRESS . COCOS DATE ÄgIIa Tibia 911 2 .. .'... Aim.., ..> i 742 5 1098 1 Arlzøna 501 1 519 2 Arthur 658 3 Ash 634 2 635 2 640 2 641 1 644 3 655 5 Beech 265 2 285 1 289 1 629 1 630 3 634 2 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 76 IfJrY7 "____..._._.____'_'.m -........--- ...__._.~_.---_.._- --_.... '-"-"'---'---'~'---- ."'-_._.-._..__._.._--~----- Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 640 1 641 2 645 4 644 4 654 3 658 1 659 2 662 2 663 2 667 2 668 2 672 1 673 2 676 2 681 2 682 2 686 1 730 1 731 2 742 2 747 1 760 2 761 1 765 2 784 1 897 1 879 2 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 77 I¿) -:5ó -----------.----..-. Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 886 I 855 I BrightliVøod 100 (park lot) 2 145 3 Broadway 310 I 330 I 415 3 429 1 444 2 454 2 471 1 476 I 481 4 795 5 Cedar 108 2 110 3 III 1 119 3 132 I 654 I 658 2 663 2 667 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 78 / /) ,,-57 ._~--- .-.--".-.-.,-,------. Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID· ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE Cencer 285 1 519 1 ChurCh 365 2 CMc>Center 36 5 Colorado 702 1 704 1 750 1 CuyamåQ 978 2 1178 2 Cypress 164 4 180 3 DScreer 231 1 321 1 343 1 385 2 395 1 415 4 449 1 541 1 543 3 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 79 / c:J ,:5';2, .'___,_____u ____'_H --".'-'---~ ---"'--"'--'--"-'---'---"-'---~- Part 4 - Location of Palms < BID, ITEM. 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 551 1 I)p~¡ti'..' i ....'..... i i i 855 1 856 2 861 2 862 2 868 2 879 1 891 1 897 2 ...",.., i , '... 221 1 239 1 DelMar 249 2 311 2 329 3 330 1 337 2 334 2 338 2 342 1 346 4 352 2 360 2 355 3 361 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACI'lTREE9495.026 80 jtJ?) _.~--._--.--- .__._....~._.". .... -.- .-..,.,......--".- Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 377 3 389 1 606 5 1 622 1 669 3 685 2 690 3 698 2 $ 7 ~ > ..' ...'... < 497 2 EaSt Eritêrsoll . ... 85 2 91 2 East I Street 25 1 33 1 EaSt..lStreet 242 1 East James 230 1 East .. MlUån 150 1 156 2 165 3 170 1 186 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACflTREE9495.026 81 I{}<~r - -------....--.----------...-----.-.......--. ------- ,-.-.------.-.. - ---..-. Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 212 2 215 1 218 I 221 2 245 I EaSt,..I" 480 2 East Q'ª".' ...,. Center Island 48 East Påloma, Strèet 65 2 East Qutlttard 146 2 Eè:klnalt 1419 I Elm 711 2 741 I 3 1123 I 1127 2 1192 I ElsleW,;W 678 1 Emerson 216 2 227 I M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 82 I!J'Þ~ --.._-_.._----_.~--,.. ---- u___.__, - ----.--.--.-.----.,..,-....... ..--.-- Part 4 - Location of Palms . BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE Eucalyp1;US Park 6 13 .. ,...'. F Street 48 2 202 1 210 1 224 1 246 1 257 2 263 2 265 2 270 14 275 3 276 (church) 3 465 2 495 1 514 1 525 2 533 2 536 1 Fifth . 119 1 175 4 246 1 604 1 608 1 619 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTITREB9495.026 83 j¡;:5þ ~...___.__..____.m ...__.~______..._ -- -------------- Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 640 3 644 1 648 1 756 1 783 1 804 1 1098 1 4 fig 597 2 657 1 658 1 662 2 667 2 680 1 First 201 1 621 3 695 1 1255 2 Flower . 105 2 115 2 120 1 129 2 138 1 142 4 477 3 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 84 /¿J /57 --------_._~._~~.._._.- Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 508 4 516 2 518 2 520 2 > Fourth 598 1 602 1 102 5 GSttêêt 15 4 39 4 45 1 130 2 227 1 394 1 431 2 453 1 459 1 Garrett 244 2 257 1 261 2 265 2 269 2 275 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 85 /¿}?p~ .·"---P.··-··-·-····- -----_.._-~_.._-- . _ __. __.___...._m Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE Glover 247 2 Gresø.os...,'..ªrIt 7 4 GuaVa ... > 103 1 1 106 1 107 1 114 2 115 1 119 1 129 1 135 I 136 I 140 I 141 I 597 3 598 2 HStr'qc 112 (island) 3 Halsey 102 I 512 2 Hilltop Drive 388 I 398 6 404 I M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 86 IO/PI .___..__n_..__.______...__, Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 597 2 I Street 133 1 221 1 224 4 287 1 316 2 320 1 328 2 355 2 409 1 412 1 456 1 676 2 682 1 1 Street 379 1 427 2 430 2 445 1 446 1 Jamul 155 1 485 1 Jeff.$9!t 507 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREB9495.026 87 II) ,,~f} .-,-....------ -.-- __ _ _ __....___..._._ "~.. .,n-..___ .....0_____ .--- -------------~....- Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 521 1 577 2 1062 2 1066 2 JUd$o!JViIY 1216 2 KScrêêt 280 1 290 3 473 2 .. KQrnet 145 5 landis 112 1 220 2 224 2 226 1 230 2 234 2 240 4 248 2 276 (parking lot) 12 251 4 240 (parking lot) 8 Madison 25 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 88 j{}/IP / -. ~----_._---_.. Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 105 2 117 2 120 1 129 2 138 2 142 4 1057 1 MådroDa .'. 158 1 169 2 175 2 251 1 Mcintosh 502 2 Mission 1217 1 1224 2 1230 1 1235 1 , Monserate . 788 2 793 4 797 1 Monte Vista 80 1 93 4 M:I..IADMINICONTRAC1ìTREE9495.026 89 /Ô~þ;2.. _._~- __ __.____ m. _._____,__,._____ --~._~,~.,,- Part 4 - Location of Palms ...'.... BID ITEM t BID.·ITEM.. ·2 COCOS DATE Moss 138 3 481 4 ",_i .'. Myra ...',..'.. 739 1 757 1 760 1 766 1 767 1 771 1 1326 2 Napa 1187 1 1188 1 1194 2 1195 1 1198 1 1201 1 1202 1 1205 1 1231 1 1235 1 Naples 129 3 566 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACfITREE9495.026 90 /¿}~/? } -_.__.~.._--'._'._---"--'-'----'-- --~..._--,- ------....---- .._...._._-,._..-----~-- - Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE NC!Ptone .'.. < 1190 1 1198 1 1201 1 1202 1 1208 1 1223 1 1230 1 ... ..,. .. 1213 1 1218 1 1231 1 1234 1 1235 1 Oaklawn , 70 3 74 1 76 2 78 2 85 2 675 3 1069 1 Ol.and. 1162 2 o.ayP'adc 2 2 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 91 /f)--?( ______"~._. nu_ ._.. __~__.___ --~-~----- -.--.-.---........-.--..-. ---- --- -.-.-...-.'" _"'~'m_ __-"__n _ _ _ Part 4 - Location of Palms BDlTEM1 BID ITEM 1 ADDRESS COCOS DATE Parkway 300 26 13 545 3 561 4 567 2 RohrPåtk 9 7 ROOsevelt 319 1 361 1 S~~ Vale 203 2 209 3 210 5 216 1 219 2 222 3 223 1 225 1 226 1 235 2 237 1 240 1 241 2 242 1 245 2 248 2 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 92 /o--¿f -~--_._-----,- -<.---.----- --'-""'- -----..'"'.-.--.......-.---..-,..,--. Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM f BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 252 2 255 3 260 1 262 2 -- 265 2 271 1 277 2 282 3 285 4 286 4 289 4 292 3 299 1 601 3 618 4 Second 94 1 135 1 145 2 165 3 226 2 232 2 238 2 247 2 272 1 333 1 385 1 M:\.. \ADMIN\CONTRACTlTREE9495.026 93 /tJ/?? ---'-"'--_."~._._"_."..._--'.'--'"- ,.-.....-."..--...,-.".--...-- _ ,,_ _.~~__._" __.____._. __._.~ ......._·_._._______·n._ __ ___._.m'___'.'_ Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 561 2 1136 2 1171 1 1189 1 Shasta ..' 239 1 245 3 SltrraWa-¡ 21 3 30 2 36 2 42 3 46 1 thIrd 300 (center island) 20 452 2 Trtmont 415 2 421 4 427 3 435 4 445 1 Twin Oålu 331 1 559 3 576 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACTlTREE9495.026 94 /þ¿¿þ 7 _______·_··_____~_~··__n'__·_'....__ ________._._ _m___ - - -~-_.._. . _,_ _..___._nu __....u___ Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM f BID ITEM 2 ADDRESS COCOS DATE 561 2 1136 2 1171 I 1189 I Shasta 239 I 245 3 Sierra W4lY .. 21 3 30 2 36 2 42 3 46 I third 300 (center island) 20 452 2 Tremont 415 2 421 4 427 3 435 4 445 I Twin C)ak$ . 331 I 559 3 576 1 M:I..IADMINICONTRACflTREE9495.026 94 /tJ/¡;~ ---,..,,--------_._-_._~--- _.0__- .-.---- ----_.,- -~.~-,._.,. Part 4 - Location of Palms BID ITEM 1 BIÞlnM ·2 AÞÞUSS COCOS DATE 790 1 1166 1 ,¡, '...,.'., > ..'. .'.. 362 1 WbltritY '. 57 2 63 3 64 3 70 5 85 3 92 2 626 1 WOOdIâWn 685 1 687 1 772 3 M:I..IADMIN\CONTRACTlTREE949S.026 95 IIJ/£¡ ------~~ - ,- ..-- - ~ ..-.-.. --'---.-.-.-.,--.---- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item JI Meeting Date 2/7/95 ITEM TITLE: Report Regarding the Development Impact Fee Funds for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1994 Resolution No. J 7 8"'~ng Findings that the Unexpended Funds in the Various DIF Funds are still needed to provide construction of facilities for which the fees were collected SUBMITTED BY: [>;recto", Fi~œ ff' ~ REVIEWED BY: ::::;: 7i J (4/5THS Vote: Yes_No...xJ State Government Code Section No. 66000 requires local agencies assessing Development Impact Fees ("DIP") to make available specified financial data to the public each fiscal year. It also requires that the local agency review this information at a public meeting. Local agencies are also required to make findings once each year for any funds remaining unexpended or uncommitted for five or more years. The findings must identify the purpose for the fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged. This report includes the required financial information for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994 and specifies the findings of need for funds held for five or more years. RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the report and approve the Resolution making findings that the unexpended funds in the various DIF Funds are still needed to provide construction of facilities for which the fees were collected. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable. DISCUSSION: The City of Chula Vista has several types of Development Impact Fees ("DIF") which were assessed during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994. The major categories of DIPs are for J)- / ___.._____~__. ....__.....n'_ _._-,-_..._---_...~- -----~.,._..- Page 2, Item / / Meeting Date 2/7/95 transportation, traffic signal, park, drainage, sewer and public facilities. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City to finance and coordinate the construction of new transportation facilities so that streets are built when needed. This fee is applicable to all new development east of 1-805. Prior to the program, streets were built by developers in a fragmented fashion with 6-lane facilities, necking down to 2-lanes and expanding back to 6 lanes again. In addition, there was a fairness issue since some developers fronted on large streets and others did not. Now all developers in the Eastern portion of Chula Vista pay the same fee per dwelling unit and either the City constructs the street or a developer does, using the cost to offset the TransDIF fee at the building permit stage. For FY93-94 the fee was $3,060 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE - This fee was adopted to provide for the projected traffic signal needs for the City that result from increases in traffic volume caused by development. As funds are accumulated they are expended on traffic signal projects that meet the warrants at the time the funds are available. This is a city-wide fee with a FY93-94 rate of $13 per trip generated. EASTLAKE PARK DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City to finance and coordinate the construction of new parks in the Eastlake I area which also encompasses the north half of Eastlalœ Greens. Projects remain to be completed within the Eastlake Greens Community Park. TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF - This fee is applicable to all new development within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin. The FY93-94 fee was $3,922 per acre and pays for the construction of the Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo Ladera and the Eastlake Business Center and a portion of the channel west ofI-805. TELEGRAPH CANYON GRAVITY SEWER DIF - This is a fee for the expansion of the trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. The FY93-94 fee was $184 per EDU. TELEGRAPH CANYON PUMPED SEWER DIF - This fee is collected for the expansion of the Telegraph Canyon trunk sewer to serve those properties outside of the basin. These flows are pumped into the trunk line temporarily and may ultimately drain to another basin, either Poggi or Salt Creek, by gravity. If Telegraph Canyon basin becomes built out, there may be no reserve capacity for the temporary pumped flows and a parallel system must be built. If, however, the capacity is never exceeded once the gravity basin is built out and no parallel system is built because of the temporary flows, the funds will be returned to the current property owners. The FY93-94 fee was $560 per EDU. PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF - The Public Facilities DIF is a city-wide fee with several components levied to fund that portion of public facilities projects attributable to new development. Prior to July 1993, the separate fee components collected for the different public facilities were placed in separate funds,. Funds from one facility component fund could not be II".) --............................................ ......---~ -----------_. ,-..----, - - Page 3, Item /1 Meeting Date 2/7/95 used to finance projects of another facility component, regardless of the need for, or timing of the various projects. Loans were made from other City funds for project components with insufficient cash. Under the current ordinance, fees collected after July 1993 for the separate fee components are consolidated in a single fund rather than in separate facility funds. Thus, the funds are available for whichever approved project is currently scheduled and interfund loans are minimized. For FY93-94 the total fee for all components was $2,150 per EDU. The components of the Public Facilities DIF with the associated fee are as follows: ADMINISTRATION ($79) - Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program, overseeing of expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of costs, etc. This fee is set at 2 % of the other Public Facilities DIFs charged. CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION ($527) - Expansion of the Civic Center per the Civic Center Master Plan prepared in 1989, to provide sufficient building space and parking for the existing and anticipated staff and the public. POLICE FACILITY ($235) - Accommodation of the building space needs per the Civic Center Master Plan, which included upgrading of the communications center, construction of a new crime lab, office improvements and installation of new communication consoles. Also included is the purchase and installation of a new computer aided dispatch system (CAD), a new Records Management System, and new Mobile Digital Terminals. CORPORATION YARD RELOCATION ($515) - Relocation of the City's existing corporation yard from the bayfront area to a site more centrally located and of a larger size. The existing site is near capacity. LmRARIES ($544) - Improvements include construction of the South Chula Vista library and Eastern Territories library(ies), and installation of a new automated library system. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM ($141) - Projects include the relocation of Fire Station #4 & #3, construction of a fire training tower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig, expansion of Fire Station #1, installation of a radio communications tower and construction of an interim and permanent Station #6. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ($49) - Purchase and installation of a GIS system for mapping of various base maps and creation of goo-data files to aid in planning and processing of land developments. MAINFRAME COMPUTER ($23) - Purchase and installation of a new mainframe computer and various enhancements to meet existing and future needs for additional //:J -------.._- -~.~----~-_..._- .. --- "..--.----.-------....--.-.........--.-- -- ._.,."--_.__.._--'--'_._~._.,,---_.__..__._----_._.- Page 4, Item Jj Meeting Date 2/7/95 memory and storage space and enhanced processing speed. TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE ($32) - Upgrading and expansion of the City's existing telephone system to accommodate growth, including installation of new conduit, wiring additional telephone lines, and a voice processing system. RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ($5) - Updating and modernization of the existing records system to prepare the City for anticipated increases in transactions and volumes of records. Attachment A, Schedule 1 reports the required financial information about the components of the Public Facilities DIF. Attachment A, Schedule 2 reports the required financial information for the rest of the DIFs. The schedules contain the following items: - The beginning balances as of July 1, 1993. - The DIF fees received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994. - The interest earned from investing the cash balances available in each DIF fund during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994. - The expenditures from each of the DIF funds during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994. - Transfers out to other funds as approved by City Council during FY 1993-94. - The ending balances as of June 30, 1994 for each of the DIF Funds The ending balances as of June 30, 1994 have been audited, however, the audit report is not yet available. FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR FUNDS IN POSSESSION OVER 5 YEARS Government Code Section 66001.d requires the local agency to make findings once each fiscal year with respect to any portion of the fee remaining unexpended in its account five or more years after deposit of the fee to identify the purpose for which it was charged. The following projects are listed to satisfy Section 66001.d of the Government Code. a. Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) The projects listed in Attachment B, Table I are to be constructed using monies collected by the Transportation Development Impact Fee. Any funds in the account that are five or more //-i ~-~._---~...- -,"--~-------~-"----"- _._.,.__...._..___. ." - .n_'._'..____.__._________··'____ Page 5, Item 1L Meeting Date 2/7/95 years old have been appropriated for specific projects. No funds in the account five or more years are uncommitted. b. Eastlake Park Development Impact Fee The $742,959 from fees collected prior to FY89-90 are needed for the construction of facilities, i.e. concrete slab, within the Eastlake Greens Community Park pursuant to the agreement approved by Resolution No. 15225. This agreement is currently being re- evaluated. The City is also in the process of reviewing and updating the original Eastlake Park, Eastlake II and Eastlake III agreements. As of June 30, 1994, the funds are still needed for the intended purpose. No other DIF funds contain monies that have been on deposit for five or more years. FISCAL IMPACT: With findings that identify the continued need for the unexpended and uncommitted fees, the City retains the DIF fees for the future projects. Without findings that the unexpended funds are still needed for the projects, the City would be obligated to refund the $742,959 in park funds that have been held five or more years pursuant to State Government Cost Section No. 66000 and the Eastlake Park Agreement. Attachment A - Schedule 1: Financial Information for Public Facilities DIF Attachment A - Schedule 2: Financial Information for All Other DIFs Attachment B - Table 1: Transportation DIF Capital Improvement Projects fin:\usen\susanc\dif.113 JJ~..5 .---_._."'~_.-._.._---_.._.,..__.,._~--~.._'~--_.._.._." - - ----..--. ________n__". -..- ._~----_._,_._,,- ----_._--~._-- RESOLUTION NO. J?Yt/,,2.. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAKING FINDINGS THAT THE UNEXPENDED FUNDS IN THE VARIOUS DIF FUNDS ARE STILL NEEDED TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES FOR WHEN THE FEES WERE COLLECTED WHEREAS, Government Code §66000 requires local agencies assessing Development Impact Fees ("DIF") to make available specified financial data to the public each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, it also required that the local agency review this information at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, local agencies are also required to make findings once each year for any funds remaining unexpended or uncommitted for five or more years, which findings must identify the purpose for the fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee ad the purpose for which it was charged. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby make findings that the unexpended funds in the various DIF Funds are still needed to provide construction of facilities for which the fees were collected for the following projects: Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) The projects listed in Attachment B, Table 1, are to be constructed using monies collected by the Transportation Development Impact Fee. Any funds in the account that are five or more years old have been appropriated for specific projects. No funds in the account five or more years are uncommitted. Park Development Impact Fee The $742,959 from fees collected prior to FY89-90 are needed for the construction of facilities, i.e. concrete slab, within the Eastlake Greens Community Park pursuant to the agreement approved by Resolution No. 15225. The City is in the process of reviewing and updating the original Eastlake Park, Eastlake II and Eastlake III agreements. As of June 30, 1994, the funds are still needed for the intended purpose. Presented by veJlas 0 ~ Robert Powell, Director of Finance C:\rs\findings.OIF 11·1, ^------ _.' --. '.---.,-..,--. - -.._~.- --- - --...-- -~._---_.~ ~ ~ ~~ E ~ O~~~NO'O " 0 ~~~~ N D. R; ~~::~:a : ~ :: ... g~~~ ~ U"I.... .. ........,.. .....11........ .. ~ ~ ~ èi!~~~ : ~ ~ II ~~~~ ~ -4' 0 U"I ~~~~.~ 011 ~.~ U"I 0.... ....,.. ....11.. ...... .,. ~ ~ II N ~ ~ .,. ...,. .... U"I .... ; OO~NOO 0 .... II 0 M~O~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~8 M ~~ n ~~ 8 ~ ~ 3æ2 ~ ....~ ~ffi2~n~"" ~ ¿ ~ uo~ ~ ~ UO~U"I"'" ~ ~ I we .,. WC~~".... .,. __ ~z .... ~Z".... ~ ~ ~ II I I . w ~ oo;~~o 0 W II 0 ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~= = ~~a M ~= II ~~~~ 2 t~ ~ ~~g ¿ NN I ~~~8n ~~~~ ~ b~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ n ~~~~r ~........~ ~ ~~~ ~ WW M " ww ........ ~ -~= .... .... .... .-._~ 0. 0. '... ~ _ __ _ 11'\' o~o W __ OOM-4'OO 0 W 0 ~O~. N ~M~_'_ ~ffi ~ ~~.,. ~ffi 0 ~~ ~ ..o.~o~ .r::.::....co.... 0:......000........ >->-Q)ø:3 ~JO M ~o ~~~O 0 coo 0. ~~UQ)D. ZD.OO ~....II'\ za.o.U"I M 0.11'\ ~ -z M -EMCO M............ Q)~-~~ ceo ...., ..co .,. a..coo·_u EU EU.... 0 a.-co I... -0 ... G.I _ __ _ a..-4'G.lU -4' u N OooN.....Co, 101 U 0 MO...... 0..&::1II:IL.. 0. _0 ~ ..........N M _0 ,.., >ON U"I ~.....~~o . =>- -4' M>OCO =>- N ~co,.., 0 ~ M Q. en...... .. .. .. Q. cnll'\..... .. .. ........ 0 0. ~o~ ~ ~g ~o~~ ~ ~g ~ ~~o=~ >- O~ M.......... O~MCO M.............. o.~~1 ~ 02.... Oz ....""" M Q)U"IC~~ w_ w_ ~ ~~-~~ woo I ~ en w ~~~ ~ ~ ~ g~~ooo ~ ~" 0 ~~OO ~II ~Ol£~ I- > N ,..,.......... ê3 > II 00. 0 II ~ ]I: u w~..o......" W~""'~II......II §U- ~ ~~ß ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~II ~N ~" ._i~;~ z ~~,.., ~""" ~~,..,~II..... .....11 ~-~ ~ - ~ ~ ~" ~ II ~ ~n '~~£~8 I- II II II ._ '- U 2....... ~ ca ~ C to W ~,.., O~~OOO 0.11 ~ II 0 ,..,~OO 011 U 0·_ E W ~ 0,..,.....11 W II ~..o 011 uen~~~ f5 I:II::~ ~ .......~.. .......11 ~,..,~ II ..0... .......11 ca~]!5 2 ~ <0.................... <.....011,..,..... .....11 ~ U~. W I:II::~ N~ ~ 1:II::0.~1I 0..... Nil ~~ >en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,..,~" ~ ~U ~-~Sff o ~ ~ II II ~.....~ ~ II II O· ca~ ca ~ ~....... ~ ~ ~ .- W Q NON r:::! 000 ..... Q" 0 ..... 0 0 0 ..... II U) S! 12 ..1 ;:: ~~ ~ tee ~ ~~ II õ~ ê511 ~8.a;~"2 _ ><~........ >-<N.............II ·_~o~~ ~ uo e....."" ~ U.....OII.......... ill en~ ~.~ _ ~o~ ~.....,..,~ ~Oo.~" ~..... II tO~~ ~ U I¥~ ~ ~ I I¥~""COII .., ~]0 < ow ~ II ow II II ~en~_~ I&. U 1:1I:: II U 1:1I:: " II ~._ ~ 0 II II II en~o.~. U ....... ....... ~~ _ N N ~ ]l:cen ~ .......~ ..................... §5t~-§ ~ II N OOO'NOO'.....II II 0 NON~'~" Q.~ - ~ w~ II ~ ~~~ :~u w~ II ~ ~~:....." I~~ca~.~ < u_ II .. ...... ,..II U_.....,..,II.. .......11 ~ca..4I> I- _~""" ~ ~o.o. '~II _~.....Oll ~ ~O.o.II ~~~~~.- ~ ~_Oll ,.., 'Oil ~-0.~11 0 0. co 1..011 ~en~o.en~ _ OU~II N ~~ .NII OU""COII"" ~~''''''" ~- ,.- > ~<" ~ ''''11 ~c: II ~ ..1\ .....~,..,.......... I&. II , II ~" .....,..... II en..o~~.Q to :5 II , II "~'~" ~~~.....~iI ~ ...... ~ en en U).- % ..... .....~~~~> U ~ U C to .- Cen~~U)~ ~ ~ O~O'OOO'NII II 0 .....000'011 _caU)~cac o ~ ~co ,,.., II II -4'...:t '~II ]I: QI ]1:._ 1:1I:: 0........... 'O.Il 1:1I:: 11 O~ '...:tll ]~- >- UW.. , "II UWON"....'..II 0 Q.tO I- _I-N ~.....,.., 'O.Il _1-.....011""..... 'Oil N~U"2"E _ >20,.., 0.0 'Nil >20.~11 ~..... 'Oil ~CO~en~ca U -WCO.....,.., 'U"III _W""COII ......11 ._~ UU ..... ~ :~II ...... uu I: :~II .~"E.~~~~ .. ,''"'''' II I II ~~~cc_ ~ I-~I-_OQ ........... 0 ..................... ...... 0. 2 0 000.0.00.011 ~ 2 "0 ,..,..........O"~II . _ ..... ,..,0 ,''" ~ _ II ~U"ICOO'o.ll ..... N,.., ,.., E ~ ,..,0 , II % II .....0.0.0'.....11 ~~ 0. Q..... 'II Q Q 0...... II ..~ .. .., .. II 0. C:0 ~ .......... 'II 2 <0011 N N.....'COII ..... CO..... ~..... ," ~ 0.11'I11 0 ..0.....',..,11 ~... 'II I&. ~""COII ..... ~~'ftltll 1:1I:: 2 ~ , II 2 1\ .,. ,~II c: W 'II..;t W 1\ , " W 0 II 0.0 II II ~ ' '" ~ ,.., ~ ~ ,.., ~ æ U 0. 0...... 0. 0. I- ~ , ~ , " 0 _ ..... W 0 1:1I:: ..... 0 2 I&. 0 U ,.., c: 0 ,.., , 2 , W , , o ..... ~ W< ~ >- ..... ~ ~ I- 0 0 UI:II:: 0 0 0 0 z 2m ~ 2 1:1I:: W _ ......c:~ 0 c: W -...... 0 o U 2 I->õ Z U U Z I- Z ~ ~ ~ ð~z ë ~ ~ ~ ð ë ~ ~ W ~ W 2 ~ ~ W ~ Z 00( ~ ~z~ W < ~ ~2 W I&. m W~W_OI:II:: ~ m W~W_ ë 0 i~~~I-~ 8 ë 0 i~~~ 8 Z WWI-1¥2 _ Z WWI-I:II:: - ~ _ >%_WWW I¥ ~ - >z-w I¥ W ::z WI-Q~E> W W Z WI-QI&. W _ Z I¥~Z~>I:II:: ~ _ ::z I¥~Z~ ~ I- _ wwz<w I- - WWZ _ 0 ~>~c:~~ ~ - 0 ~>~c: ~ ~ W _ZXI¥WW < ~ W _ZXI:II:: < _ m a-wl-l¥l:II:: m - m a-wI- m u u < < ~ ~ u u ~ ~ .. .. it it ))"' 7 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 1 --- ---- --.-.----.- It) 01 , <: '" 7 .. C? Z 0 o co co OCa:re ... COM .. CO 01 >-Wwc.o Ñ Ñ ZO-~ .. .. <:; ... U:JCI) ...Ie.. I!! Z C? :J 8 ~ 8 o~a:¡:;¡ ... It) 01 N ~ ... >- w'" <Xi uf"": .,; Z:>~ ... N ~ ð~CI) ..JeJ w f- -a; .. g¡¡:!ffi~ 01 , Wco g¡ eJN ;2i Nit)'" :J 01 <'" ,.: ¡5g¡8~ ¡;f .. Z ..,. ~ ~ .. (f) ~C\I It) ... ... I a: c II 0 II u.. (J It) ~ 01 II W W .. 0 It) W ~~N N ... 01 u.. ::)a:'" gj Ò Ñ f- f-it ..,. ..,. 0 ... ... it ~ ... ... ;;¡¡ f- 0 CO'" § ..,. Z N OCO .. W 0...1 It) MOl CO :; i:Lc:(~ 0) (f)~- <Xi <Õ e.. u..Z.. 0 01.. ... 16 9 g~N .. "'.. ~ ... ... W (¡j C ~...~§' N' ¡!: Z 0 '" I .. 16 ... II 0 01 ..;¡I; 01 (J ¡:: ~~ II :> .,; ~ò<Xi~ .,; 01 II ¡!:.. ... CIIt)~ 0 ¡¡t II ::) 0 It)N N ~ a:N '$ ~~ :;¡ 0'" .. $ II J: 0- Il 0 (J II u.. Z II 0 ~ II ~ f- II II Õ -a; '" õ g¡ Q) ~ () - Q) <: 0> .. () '" ¡;:: U) c .c <: Q) 0> '" E 'õ <: ~> <: () "E '5 ~ 5 W <: '" ~ 0 <: '0 õj 8J~cn-õUJ 0 .¡: m 'df'" Q) 0> 0- <: ~ Q) 'is E Q) Q) '0 '2 &! ~ 5i ìG' ~ () <: <: <: :J .s> '" u.. u.~a. Q.(f. õj Q) - ¡¡j Q) Q) m c.E f-a:a: m /I"'~ ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE 2 .._. ___. _'..._'__'.,_'.',_m ______.'_n - ---~._---_._-----,-,_._--- no ----..- TABLE 1 TRANSPORTATION DIF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Revised DIP Street Location Cost as of Status as of June 3D, 1994 July, 1992 State Route 125 North San Miguel to Telegraph Canyon Road $0 Will be transferred to SR-125 DIP/CPD State Route 125 South Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange o Will be transferred to SR-125 Avenue DIP/CPD Telegraph Canyon Road Paseo Del Rey to East of Paseo Ladera 3,452,000 Widening to 6-Jane prime Telegraph Canyon Road 1-805 Interchange Phase II 1,814,000 Interchange Improvements (Phase IIA is under construction) East n H" Street 1-805 Interchange Modifications 3,780,000 Interchange Improvements (Phase I completed) Otay Lakes Road Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange 4,574,000 Construction as 6-1ane prime (only Avenue Phase I - 4 lanes included) Bonita Road atay Lakes Road to Central Avenue 370,000 Widening to 4-lane major Bonita Road Central Avenue to San Miguel Road 792,000 Widening to 4-lane major San Miguel Road Bonita Road to SR-125 1,574,500 Second Part of SR-125 DIP/CPD Proctor Valley Road Mt. Miguel Road to Hunte Parkway 5,377,000 Construction as 6-lane prime (East """ Street) East Orange Avenue Oleander to Sunbow Eastern Boundary 6,266,000 Construction as 6-1ane prime East Palomar Street Oleander to Sunbow Eastern Boundary 6,782,000 Construction as 4-lane major Hunte Parkway Proctor Valley Road to Telegraph Canyon 4,395,000 Construction as 4-1ane major Road Hunte Parkway Club House Drive to East Orange Avenue 1,250,000 Construction as 4-1ane major East Orange Avenue Eastlake Parkway to Hunte Parkway 6,356,000 Construction as 6-1ane prime Paseo Ranchero Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange 3,388,000 Construction as 6-1ane prime (only Avenue Phase I - 4 lanes included) East Orange Avenue Eastern Sunbow Boundary to Eastlake 10,961,000 Construction as 6-lane prime Parkway East Orange Avenue I-80S Interchange Modifications 4,064,000 Interchange Improvements East Palomar Street Eastern Sunbow Boundary to Pasco 3,120,000 Construction as 4-1ane major Ranchero ATTACHMENT B Ij-1 TABLE 1, PAGE 1 OF 2 -...-'- -....-..-.....---..-.. m_ TABLE 1 TRANSPORTATION DIF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Revised DIP Street Location Cost as of Status as of June 30, 1994 July, 1992 East Palomar Street 1-805 Interchange 2,673,000 Interchange Improvements Telegraph Canyon Road H uote Parkway to Wueste Road 3,114,000 Construction as 4-1ane major East Orange Avenue Hunte Parkway to Olympic Training Center 5,104,000 Construction as 4-lane major Telegraph Canyon Road SR-125 to Eastlake Parkway 1,493,900 Widening to 8-lane prime Eastlake Parkway Fenton Street to Telegraph Canyon Road 980,400 Widening to 6-lane major East "H" Street 1-805 to Hidden Vista Drive 901,000 Widening to 8 lanes Bonita Road atay Lakes Road Intersection 105,000 Intersection Improvements Otay Lakes Road Elmhurst Drive Intersection 70,000 Intersection Improvements East "H" Street Otay Lakes Road Intersection 221,000 Intersection Improvements Traffic Signal System wide 138,000 Interconnection Eastlake Parkway Eastlake High School Southern Boundary to 2,381,000 Construction as 4-lane major EastOrange Avenue East "H" Street Paseo Del Rey to Tierra Del Rey 682,000 Street Widening (Phase 1 & 2 completed) Bonita Road I -805 to Plaza Bonita Road 270,000 Street Widening TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 86,448,800 DIF program support 5 % of total project cost 4,322,440 GRAND TOTAL 90,771,240 ATTACHMENT B /1- /P TABLE 1, PAGE 2 OF 2 ___u --.".------" COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /d- Meeting Date 217195 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: PCM-95-05; Amendment to the Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan PC District Regulations to allow by conditional use pennit a dental practice as an accessory use to a dental laboratory or dental appliance manufacturing within the Employment Park Limited Industrial (EP-lb) land use district of the Rancho Del Rey Business Center. Ordinance ';'/,.1. ~ Amending Chapter lX-A.I, Pennitted and Conditional Uses of the Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan PC District Regulations. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.lO --r The applicant, Emesto Underwood, has submitted applications for an amendment to the Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan PC District Regulations and a conditional use pennit in order to establish a dental practice (dental office) as an accessory use to a pennitted dental laboratory at the southeast comer of Tierra Del Rey and Canarios Court within the Rancho Del Rey Business Center. The Planning Commission has considered and approved the conditional use pennit contingent upon approval of the SPA Amendment. The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposal and has prepared an addendum to FSEIR-87-01, Rancho del Rey Specific Plan, which must be considered by the City Council prior to a decision on the project (see attachment 6). RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Ordinance amending the Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan PC District regulations in accordance with the findings contained therein. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On December 19, 1994, the Design Review Committee voted 4-0 to approve the development proposal subject to conditions (see attachment 4 and 5). On January 11,1994, The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed SPA amendment in accordance with Resolution PCM-95-05. The Commission also voted 6-0 to conditionally approve the conditional use pennit contingent upon approval of the SPA Amendment (see attachment 3). /.J. -I .."----------.- -,---.-.--- - _,._____________... __"0_- m_.____ . - --~-_._._-_._----, --"'-'--'-'-~~'~-- Page 2, Item J.J- Meeting Date 2/7/95 DISCUSSION: 1. Existing Site Characteristics The Limited Industrial (EP-lb) District consists of approximately 21.4 acres located on the eastern portion of the RDR Business Center (see Exhibit C). 2. SPA Land Use designations and land use. Zonim! Land Use Parcels 3,6,12,15,19,& 20 EP-1b Vacant Parcel 4 EP-1b Admin. Offices Parcel 16 EP-1b Jewelry Mfg. Parcel 17 EP-1b Admin. Offices Parcel 18 EP-1b Commercial Offices Parcel 21 EP-1b SDG&E Elect. Sub-Station (See Exhibit C) 3. Proposed Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan PC District Regulation Amendment The proposed SPA I PC District Regulations amendment is a request to modify Chapter IX-A.l, Permitted and Conditional Uses section of the Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan PC District Regulations adopted by ordinance No. 2535 to allow dental offices as an accessory use to a permitted Dental Laboratory and Dental Appliance Manufacturing within the Employment Park Limited Industrial land use district (EP-1b) of the Rancho Del Rey Business Center. 4. Analysis The Rancho Del Rey General Development Plan designates the easterly 29.9 acres of the overall Business Center as Employment Park (see Exhibit A). In order to achieve a diverse and harmonious Business Center enviromnent, the Employment Park (EP) is divided into two specific land use districts: the EP-la, Research Industrial Administrative and Professional District, and the EP-1b, Limited Industrial District. The proposed project is located within the EP-1b land use district (see Exhibit B). The EP-1a district is intended for light industrial uses, large scale research, specialized manufacturing, and administrative and professional offices, including medical and dental offices. The EP-1 b district is intended as an area for more exclusive light industrial development, which includes business and administrative offices, but which does not include medical or dental offices. /.2.-"-.. Page 3, Item J:L Meeting Date 2/7/95 The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Development Plan and would not change the basic character of the EP-lb District. The accessory dental practice will be limited to a total of 35 % of the combined floor area devoted to dental manufacturing, laboratories and other dental related uses or no more than 15 % of the total building floor area whichever is less (traditionally, 15 % has been interpreted as the level at which a use is considered accessory). The traffic generated by the dental office, when compared with the traffic generated by pennitted uses in the EP-l b land use district, represents an increase of about 30 average daily trips (ADT) per thousand square feet or about 72 total trips in a 24 hour period (peak hour 10-12 additional trips) for the 2,400 sq. ft. in question. According to the City Traffic Engineer, the increase in ADT and peak hour traffic is insignificant when viewed in the context of the overall Business Center trip generation. For the reasons noted, we are recommending approval of the SPA amendment in accordance with the attached City Council Ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT: The applicant has paid for all costs associated with the processing of this amendment and associated conditional use pennit. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft City Council Ordinance 2. Exhibits 3. Planning Commission Minutes and Resolutions 4 DRC Minutes 5. Conceptual Development Proposal 6. Fourth Addendum to FSEIR 87-0 I 7. Disclosure Statement (m:\... \luis\pcm-9505.A13) )JrJ ¡í2-1- --- ------- -_._---_._._.~._._. -,..- "----"- --.--_.~.._- - -- -- --~ ORDINANCE NO. r2.¿~f AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER IX-A. 1, PERMITTED AND CONDffiONAL USES, OF THE RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) I PLAN PC DISTRICT REGULATIONS I RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, The Employment Park Limited Industrial District is diagrammatically presented as attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; is identified and described on Chula Vista Tract 88-2 as lots 25 to 39, inclusive, is commonly known as Rancho Del Rey Business Center and consists of 21.4 acres located on the north side of East "H" Street approximately one and one half mile east of Interstate 805 and bordered on the north by a branch of Rice Canyon; and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on September 29, 1994, Emesto Underwood (applicant) filed an application requesting an amendment to the Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan PC District Regulations (project), a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Said application requested to modify Chapter IX-A. 1, Permitted and Conditional Uses section of the Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan PC District Regulations, presented as attachment B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to allow dental practice (dental office) as an accessory use to a permitted dental laboratory or dental appliance manufacturing within the Employment Park Limited Industrial District (EP-lb) of the Rancho Del Rey Business Center. C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the project site has been in part the subject matter of Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 13392 (Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan) and Planned Community District Regulations previously approved by City Council Ordinance No. 2535. },)"5 -....----.-. - --~..._--_.._-_._.._---_._.-..-._,---- D Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised hearing on said project on January 11, 1995, and voted 6-0 (Willett abstaining) to recommend that the City Council approve the Planned Community District Regulations amendment in accordance with resolution No. PCM-95-05. The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on this project held on January 11, 1995, and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceedings. E City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said SPA amendment application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: A COMPUANCE~THCEQA Based on the findings and recommendations of the Environmental Review Coordinator contained in the Fourth Amendment to FSEIR-87-01, the City Council finds that only minor technical changes in the FSEIR are necessary to address the environmental impacts associated with this project. B FINDINGS FOR PC PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AMENDMENT The City Council hereby finds that the proposed Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I Plan PC District Regulation amendment as represented in Attachment B is consistent with the Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan and the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and that public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice supports the amendment. C APPROVAL OF ZONE AMENDMENT The City Council does hereby approves the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) I PC District Regulations amendment as presented in Attachment B. 1.2 ~? -~,----_._-_._-_._..._--_._-----_._..~- -- ------+--~.._- ------ - -.~.--.-.--_._. III NOTICE OF DETERMINATION The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of determination and fIle the same with the County Clerk. IV EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force the thirtieth day from its adoption. Presented by S Robert A. Leiter Bruce M. Boog Director of Planning City Attorney (f: \homc\planning\1uis\pcm-9505 .ceo) /.2 ~ 7//2 -IS .---.-.....-...---..-.-., ._--~._..._._" ----..,..-- . '._.-... ___n.._____.__..___...._ ... -_.._.__._~--~-,-_.. · PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST PUBLIC HEARJNG DATE: ~/q5 SUBJECT: (1.. ~ o. ~.L. ~ ~~ I a cLJ n.¡ SJ?A, L ()a..Jo\~q~.oS , LOCATION: , i i SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLIdATION.. BY FAX~Y HAND_; BY MAIL PUBLICATION DATE I J.,) \ !o,~ ! MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY qWNERS----r ~f J .IJ. NO. MAILED PER GC §54992 Legislative Staff, c~nstruction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122 LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK I I~<;; Io¡:s COPIES TO: Administration (4) V Planning V Originating Department Engineering ,,/ Others City Clerk's Office (2) V I POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS --tLl.J.(,. (qS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 7/93 -55- /2 -~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering an amendment to the Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area I (SPA) Plan Planned Community District Regulations. The SPA amendment submitted by Dr. Emesto Underwood, PCM -95-05, requests a modification to Chapter IX-A. I, Permitted and Conditional Uses Section of the Rancho Del Rey SPA I Plan PC District Regulations to allow by conditional use permit dental practice as an accessory use to a permitted dental laboratory or dental appliance manufacturing within the Limited Industrial (EP-Ib) land use district of the Rancho Del Rey Business Center (see Locator). . The proposed SPA amendment is on file in the office of the Planning Department. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this Plan Amendment in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE City Council on Tuesday, February 7, 1995 at 4:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth A venue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. COMPLIANCE WITH TIlE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA, request individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the office of the City Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) at (619) 585-5647. California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired. DATED: January 27, 1994 CASE NO. PCM-95-05 );2-/t) _._._..,,-,-_..--~._. -------- Land Use Districts ftESIOEHTiAL LAND USE DISTRICTS ~"IIOE""I4I,.Uu.nDlSTJtCT IT] .IOEHTIAi.IIHGLE'....'CllfTIUÇT æ IIUIOfN'."~ ""-..EO COHCE"" (IISTRICT "~__ MSlOIN11...~C~DlSTA'C' BUSINESS CENTER LAND USE DISTRICTS ~~ JIUloU'ICHICIUtTI'II4L. AOMIHIITII,"'."E .....orUS/Ol'OlAl. DlITMCT ¡....f. l..!."~'_n:DIfC)UI"'IIAI.(II.TItICI .. 01-1 c¿::,~ COMMERCIA.L CENTER DISTRICT (,0.-' _ .. ---~ --- 1PECtAL. PlAPOSE LAND USE DISTFæTS ~ONNIPACE-10I'11'IICT ,-"-"// @ ~.ACI-JDllTlllCT ! ... 01-1 CINH .AŒ~ 011'*=1 ! ~] cc:u.I.NTY~'''a.lTY ¡ \. . .. LJ-, ~ n ""/ / ( ,-__J \_J "'¿p ..".-...._.._..-..-..-..-....................._.._..-.-..J -_/ ..- "-I 01-1 """,--- G '-~-- .. I ... I 00-1 ... .. c-. . I 1121102 (~ flJI CHULA VISTA PL ANN I N G DEPARTMENT LOCATOR APPLICANT: Ernesto Underwood PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SPA Amendment C) ADDRESS: 875 Canarios Court Request: SPA amendment SCALE: FILE NUMBER: JcJ. II NORTH 1" = 1000' PCM-95-05 ________.,_._,._________m_____________ -.--..'. ---------- .'._- XXXXXXXÃX^XAXAXXXXX^XA~^XXX^X XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) ^AXXXAXAX^'AXXXXXXXAXXXAXXXXX AXXXXXAXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XAXAXXXAXXXAXXXXXXXA1X1XXXXXX AXXXXXAX~XXXXXXYXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXX xXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXX xXXXXXXXXXxXxXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXX) X XX)(.X...X...X x x xXxX xX xX xx x)' xX XX XX XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXAXXXXX XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXX) XXXXXAXXXXXXX)(.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXAXAXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXxXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXxXXXxXXXXXXXXX,XXXXXX) XXXXXxXXXXXxXxXXXXXxXXXXXXXXX XXxXxxxXxXxXXXxXXXXXxXXXXXXXX) ) XXXXXXXXXXXXXxxxxxxxXXXxXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXA) 6"tOlitJUI10v o"t02'1303;,,;O ) RAN L.HU UELRtY I NVeS Tr"s L P kDk bUSI.E~S CeNIEk LIOIIEU CID TkIUENT RUR l P é. 7 ,7 HUO. EK Ave 7UD1 N oCUTISUALE RU NÞTIUNAl CITY LA 919,0 SCOlT~DAl. AZ 8,Z,3 ) 6"t0¿~Ul¿Oú o402'13131.C ) ~b6i GRANUVlE. LI TV OF lHuLA vI ST A C! e '.: ¡ Pl L/u MC MilLIN UEVELDrMeNI ( 0 e, ( BUNih l.A 9J.9¡.,,2 ,7-¿7 HLlOvEk AV. oe, 0 1'4 A TI UNAL C I Tv LA 919,0 . Gee: i( 13.< ~ ~ 040Z'1317tC · ( on II( ~ 0.' (.805 OENA CI AMl::N;.¡ (;T '_ e c '-><. ChULA VISIA CA .,l91u t..HuLA noTA LA q 19:"0 ) 640<9:>2COU b402'13£1""O ~ LuT 21 LAI'4Q PpR1N~R) )Ah uII::GI.. UA~hLeCIR IC Cu CIO If\4TI::RN'lL R E uNKNLJWN pDlJRI:S~ 2~2u ~A)Eu liE LAS A~EKIt..A~ .Z, . SAN Y)JuRLJ LA 9¿l73 · . · i\ · b ,OU6UO,00 b4liOt;OUbOO S hA Hu Ck LO I',s TR uCT IúN Cu KA!'\IC hO Dtl"EY INVE>TUR~ L ~ 4 _I ¡"'A~HING1Ct, >T Llu IR ID.N I ¡.:DI( L ~ SAN DiECO CA '72 J.O:J 70ul N SCDIT~DALt kD SCUTlSLALE A. o~,5j 6 .,0¿9", O"tOU b4UZ.,3UbUO E D 0 PARI NI::R) NO 1 - 9 t5~ I.> f..:ANl TI:: k I LJG I:: uR #¿4 \,; 751.; UTAY L AKI:S Ru SAN D.EbD CA "ZIZ3 tHl..LA vISTA LA 9i910 ".. ... ( efJ CO. b "tOLqjl"tOu o402'?315úQ r e!..O ~ CIT> uF CN U LA VISIA ( O. C 10 ML MILlIN D.HLUPMENT C ( e.. Z 727 HOUHR AVE P I.J bOX b8 CO. . N.QT101¡AL lIlY CA n.,5U bO,IlA CA .,1 "JOb , ea lCt. 640'9.::111:10u b4u2"i31900 S UUT H SAN DIEGO BAY C!TIE> bO~, k. u K .iNVE)Tl..R) R L. uF KEAL TUR) CI U INIEKNATIONAL kE~L ESTATe B cO CANARIO) CT 23,0 PASt.D De i.A~ AM.RiCAS '¿I crUi.A ViSTA CA .,lnu SA' UItGU I..A 9,173 b "to¿93220u b4U2'13¿3{¡O RANCHu UELRtY INV e S10kS l P KOhl< FI::UtkJ.\L C....EIJIl UNJ,Of'..¡ cia TKIUENT RUR L P ¿7 '7 r >T 71..0l,,, ~CuTlSUALE Ru CHuLA VI~TA LA 9 j.910 S LDH~ DALe AZ 8,Z,3 );2 -) J-- -,_.~.- .------....---.-- -'--"'-'~----""---.,-- - -'-'--~'" ----_.._-~.__._---~._-~----- - ---- ~~f? :-~~ ......~~~ ""................ ......~~~ CllY OF CHULA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TELEFAX COVER LETIER Te1ecopier No. (619) 585-5612 DATE:_I /."..) ::::, ¡OJ 5 I I TO: Star News LeS!a1/ FAX NO: (619) 426-6346 FROM: 04 c~,Jl-; '6 ~.~' ~~ SUBJECT: (7 /.A !..e~.. \ J..ß....<.N.v ~\\ Ia.t· I...,., TOTAL NO. PAGES (including cover): 2- PUBUCATION DATE: I I ell; Is~'s (SeJ) I I If all pages are not received, please call Lorna @ (619)691-5041. );2~ /) 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910:(619) 691-50J1 - -- -----.~,--_. . -,_..--.._,-,----~-_._-,~._~_._-- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public hearing to consider the following: Purpose of considering an amendment to the Rancho del Rey SPA I Planned Community District Regulations, PCM-95-05 submitted by Dr. Emesto UndeIWood. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, February 7, 1995, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: January 25, 1995 /;2-11 ._..__ ...n·__"_~__,__ _..-.- ._..._.....m__.·.. .~,---"_._,._-,---- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT /3 Item Meetinq Date 2/7/95 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of Rate Increase for Collection and Disposal of Refuse SUBMITTED BY: Deputy city Manager KremPI&~ Principal ..nag'~ASSi.tant 'nyd.~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~~ ~~4/5thS Vote: Yes___ N0-L) The County of San Diego and the newly-formed Solid Waste Authority approved an increase in landfill tip fees from $55/ton to $74/ton effective 10/1/94 for the ten cities which did not join the Authority or sign a non~member contract for disposal over a guaranteed period of time. Laidlaw paid disposal costs based on the $74/ton charge from 10/1/94 through 1/31/95, although the $19/ton differential was not passed through to ratepayers as a rate increase. A public hearing to consider a pass through of those charges was noticed and opened on 1/10/95. The hearing was continued to this meeting in order to allow more time for possible changes which could impact the amount of a rate change to be processed. On 1/18/95, the Board of Supervisors and the Authority voted to eliminate the rate differential effective 2/1/95 and reduce the fee to $55/ton for all users of the system. Although the differential rate has been eliminated, the ten cities are still in litigation over this and other related issues. The cities are also participating in a settlement conference on 2/22/95 which will address the issues of the litigation including reimbursement of the four months of rate differential. As previously noted at the 1/10/95 meeting, a further brief delay in considering an increase may make more facts available concerning actual costs that must be passed on to ratepayers. The next regularly scheduled bimonthly billing cycle is scheduled for release at the end of February for March/April. Laidlaw has agreed to a delay until the 2/22/95 conference, noting that timeliness in billing is important to the public and action will need to take place as soon as possible. RECOMMENDATION: continue public hearing until 2/28/95. 13-/ ._._..______~____.____..n_...__.___.._ ........__._ _ ...._____~__,_,.__..~_ ___ _..._ ~ _~__, __ __~_ __ - ___ _________n__'....._.,_,.._.____...__ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT J;' Item Meeting Date 2/07/95 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING to Consider Adoption of a Negative Declaration regarding the AB939 Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste (HHWE) and Re-Adopting the SRRE and HHWE RESOLUTION NO. J?8"'li;J Re-Approving the SRRE and HHWE and Authorizing that Both Documents (As Amended) be Submitted to the State for Approval and Re-submitted to the County for Inclusion in the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. SUBMITTED BY: o,~,~ti"" o,m""M REVIEWED BY: City Managw ~ /Þ (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No Xl BACKGROUND: The Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) currently presented to Council for approval have not been changed since Council approved them on December 15, 1992. A second approval of the documents is necessary to complete a new environmental review requirement imposed by the State. The new environmental review does not require a change in the contents of the documents previously approved by Council and none is recommended. On April 5, 1993, staff completed the enviromnental review process that was required by the State at that time (a Notice of Exemption). On September 30, 1994, the California Integrated Waste Management Board infonned the City that its environmental documentation was not acceptable and that additional environmental review would be required under an emergency regulation established on January 3, 1994 (see Attachment A). The environmental review now required by the State (a Negative Declaration) is enclosed as Attachment B. RECOMMENDATION: That the proposed adoption of the SRRE and HHWE will have no significant environmental impact and that the City Council; 1) adopt the Negative Declaration Issued on IS-95-12; and 2) adopt the resolution approving th¡¡: SRRE and HHWE (original and amendments) subj ect to the changes required by subsequent legislation and updated information, authorizing both documents be forwarded to the State for approval and to the County of San Diego for inclusion in the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. PI,! +__ ___n_ _ _.______.._.___+.._.______.~. -,..... Page 2, Item Ii Meeting Date 2/07/95 BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Resource Conservation Commission reviewed and discussed the State mandated changes to the SRRE and the HHWE documentation at their January 9, 1995 meeting and unanimously recommended the Council adopt the Negative Declaration, SRRE and HHWE. A copy of the draft minutes are attached for your review. As was the practice with the preliminary documents, final documents and report, copies of the Negative Declaration are being provided to the Growth Management Oversight Committee. DISCUSSION: The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) required that all cities and counties prepare formal plans aimed at waste stream diversion goals of25% by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. Specifically, cities are required to adopt two "elements," one addressing source reduction, recycling and composting programs (SRRE), and the other addressing the elimination of illegal disposal of household toxins (HHWE). Once adopted, the city "elements" are to be forwarded to the County for inclusion in a Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. Failure to comply with preparation of a plan and achievement of the waste stream reduction goals may leave a jurisdiction subject to State-imposed fines of up to $10,000 per day. As noted during the previous public hearings, the planning process for meeting the goals set by AB939 is volatile and dynamic, although the goals (and penalties) are fixed. Since the law was passed in 1989, the SRRE and HHWE documents as originally envisioned by AB939 have been continually affected by legislative changes and interpretation, economic conditions, public input and program needs. The law required that two public hearings be held prior to adoption of both documents. The first public hearing requirement was met when preliminary documents were accepted at the City Council's regular meetings of 11/19/91 (SRRE) and 12/17/91 (HHWE). At that time, staff was directed to accept public comment during the designated period, address the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, and return to Council for adoption of the final set of documents when appropriate. On December 15, 1992, following the second public hearing requirement, Council adopted the final documents and the documents were forwarded to the County for inclusion along with 18 other jurisdictions in the Countywide plan. Pursuant to AB939, on December IS, 1992 Council adopted the final SRRE and HHWE and the documents were forwarded to the County. On August 31, 1994 the City forwarded the SRRE and the HHWE to the California Integrated Waste Management Board as part of the State required reporting process. On September 30, 1994, the Waste Board informed the City that its environmental documentation, a Categorical Exemption, was not sufficient to demonstrate to the State that the City had complied with CEQA. In making their determination, the Waste Board cited Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq. which requires that the Notice of Determination be filed with the State Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research as verification of CEQA compliance. )11,,,1- ~--~--- ._~,.. --. ._.__.__._n.'___..______ -- Page 3, Item 11/ Meeting Date 2/07/95 This requirement was added as part of emergency regulations which were filed with the Secretary of State on January 3, 1994, approximately nine months after the City had filed its Notice of Exemption and 13 months after Council had approved the final draft of the SRRE and HHWE. A number of other cities and counties in the State also filed a Categorical Exemption and have received similar notification from the Waste Board including the County of San Diego and the 17 other cities within the County. The SRRE and HHWE currently presented to Council for approval have not been changed since Council approved them on December 15, 1992. A second approval of the documents is necessary to complete the CEQA requirements recently imposed by the Waste Board. The Environmental Review Coordinator has detennined that the adoption of the final versions of the City's Source Reduction and Element will not have a significant impact upon the environment and has issued a Negative Declaration on 18-95-12 Attachment B. The original SRRE and HHWE documents total more than 200 pages and, therefore, are not being included in this report but are available in the City Clerk's office upon request. For Council's convenience, Executive Summaries of the original documents are included in the Attachments C along with the December 15, 1992 staff report. Attachment D constitutes the amendments to the preliminary documents approved by Council at the December 15, 1992 meeting when the final documents were approved. Conclusion The original documents of the SRRE and HHWE (provided here in Executive Summary fonn in Attachment C and D) outline programs currently underway or needed in order to meet the State mandated goals. The amendment to the preliminary documents is reflected in Attachment E. No changes have been made to the SRRE or the HHWE since Council approved the documents on 12/15/92. The documentation recently required by the Waste Board to verify CEQA compliance is enclosed as Attachment B. It is timely to adopt the Negative Declaration IS-95-l2 and subsequently re-adopt the final draft of the SRRE and HHWE documents to complete the CEQA verification requirement recently imposed by the State. Providing the Waste Board with the CEQA verification and re-adopting the current documents does not prevent the City from revising the SRRE and HHWE at its convenience. FISCAL IMP ACT: There is no fiscal impact as a result of the recommended action to adopt the Negative Declaration IS-95-12 and subsequently re-adopt the SRRE and HHWE. The fiscal impact of individual programs is and will continue to be addressed either in the annual budget cycle or midyear as the programs are brought forward. The ongoing administrative cost of planning, implementing and monitoring future programs is also addressed during the City's annual budget cycle. The fiscal impact of not moving forward on the SRRE is the possibility of State-imposed fines of up to $10,000 per day. JLj"'3 -_.- ----_.~.._._.".._-_..._-,._-~.,--~._- RESOLUTION NO. /7rtJ.J RESOLUTION OF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RE-APPROVING THE SRRE AND HHWE AND AUTHORIZING THAT' BOTH DOCUMENTS (AS AMENDED) BE SUBMITTED TO THE STATE FOR APPROVAL AND RE- SUBMITTAL TO THE COUNTY FOR INCLUSION IN THE COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN REGARDS THERETO WHEREAS, the Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) currently presented to Council for approval have not been changed since Council approved them on December 15, 1992; and WHEREAS, a second approval of the documents is necessary to complete a new environmental review requirement imposed by the State; and WHEREAS, the new environmental review does not require a change in the contents of' the documents previously approved by Council and none is recommended; and WHEREAS, on April 5, 1993, staff completed the environmental review process that was required by the State at the time (a Notice of Exemption); and WHEREAS, on September 30, 1994, the California Integrated Waste Management Board informed the city that its environmental documentation was not acceptable and that additional environmental review would be required under an emergency regulation established on January 3, 1994; and WHEREAS, the environmental review now required by the State, Negative Declaration Issued on IS-95-12 has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-12. BE IT FURTHER RESPLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the SRRE and HHWE (original and amendments) subject to the changes required by subsequent legislation and updated information and authorize both documents be forwarded to the State for approval and to the County of San Diego for inclusion in the countywide Integrated e Ma ement Plan. Preeented by 0 f~ Michael Meacham, Conservation Bruce M. Boo aa d, city Coordinator 'J' Attorney G: \rs\SRRE /Jj~ 'I; /'1-2 ______~__ __ __ __~__..,~_ _..u."_._.._u_____._...._.___ ___ _"0_' _._"..._..",.._...........___..~____._._~_.~__.___."_,,.. _ __.....____._____,___. · / ocr 3 199~ (ATTACHMENT ð.) _ STATE OF CAI..lFORNtA Pete Wilson, Governor ~~~;~TEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD e September 30, 1994 ~ .4; .~ , Mr, Michael T. Meacham Conservation Coordinator City· of Chula Vista City Manager's Office 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 , Re: Receipt of the Final Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Nondisposal Facili~y Element Dear Mr. Meacham: We are in receipt of the Ci~y of Chula Vista's Final Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE). This letter is to notify you that some of the required documentation for ~ubmittal (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section lS7SS) has not yet been received. We are currently in receipt of the following documentation: 1. The Final SRRE and NDFE; 2. Documentation verifying adoption of the Final Draft SRRE and NDFE; 3. The notices for t~e required public hearings; and 5. The Local Task Force comments on the final draft SRRE and NDFE. In order for your submittal .to be complete, please provide the following additional docume~tation: 1. Documentation verifying CEQA compliance (not required for NDFE) . ' CEOA ComDliance I The City of Chula Vista filed a Notice of Exemption on April 5, 1993, for the City"s Source Reduction and Recycling Element. The City filed the Notice o~ Exemption for exempt status based on a statutory exemption, Title 14 California Code of Regulations (14 CCR) Section 15306. This class (6) categorical exemption FI,3 .. Printed on Recycled Paper .. ! Mr. Michael T. Meacham September 30, 1994 Page 2 1,:.0; ~'f..' consists of " basic data collection, research, experimental ., . management, and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. These may be strictly for information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted or funded." The City SRRE identified several programs that could .have indirect, or direct adverse impact on the environment. The documentation provided is not sufficient to demonstrate that the City has complied with CEQA. The Notice of Exemption does not adequately or correctly describe the SRRE. Board regulations [Title 14, California Code of Regulations (14 CCR) , Chapter 9, Article 6.2] require the Selection of Programs (14 CCR Section 18733.4), Program Implementation (14 CCR Section 18733.5), an Integrated Schedule (14 CCR Section 18748 (b) (1», and Implementation Tasks (14 CCR Section 18748 (b) (1) (A» . The Source Reduction and Recycling Element does contain specific implementation strategies in the implementation schedule. Additionally, the SRRE describes programs which are selected and will be implemented in each of the following components: Source Reduction, Recycling, Composting, and Special Wastes. Subsection (a) (1) of section 18768 contains the following requirement, "When submitting the SRRE to the Board, the jurisdiction shall include .' . . a copy of the Notice of Determination which has been filed with the State Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research as verification of compliance with CEQA (Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq.) ." This requirement WaS added as part of emergency regulations which were fileð with the Secretary of State on January 3, 1994. As is apparent from 14 CCR $ection 18768, the Board believes that the preparation of a Negative Declaration and a Notice of Determination is more appropriate because it allows for increased public involvement and environmental review. The attached letter, dated April 17, 1991, also clarified the Board's position that each jurisdiction is r~sponsible for properly adopting the elements and for properly filing its Notice of Determination. Subsection (a) (1) of sectioh 18762 (14 CCR) requires each jurisdiction to "comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq" . The City has not demonstrated that it satisfies the minimum standards set forth in this section. Additional documentation is needed befbre Board staff can determine that the City has complied with CEQA. The Board's 120 day review period will not begin until all documentation has been received. please remember that you were required to submit this documentation by August 31, 1994. ~' ...., )I--t _____.._ .. om'. _._..__ ~.~__._._m____._·'____·_ ...._~-~---_.--..._------ -. -'--'~--'-'--- ~-'-'--'--'-'---- (. Mr. Michael T, Meacham , September 3D, 1994 Page 3 r:- --' ~., Should you have any questions about the submittal or review process, or the SRRE or NDFE, please call Sharron Leaon of the Office of Local Assistance at (916) 255-2666. Questions about the solid waste generation study review should be addressed to Claire Miller of the Plan Implementation Branch at (916) 255- . 2419. ,"', Sincerely, ~p~. Judith J. Friedman, Manager Office of Local Assistance and Plan Implementation Branch Attachment -, , !t- '\: ~'i ti, ii, , .~. ~ /'1- l ". .-----....~_._-.--- ." --- --... ------~··_-~---_,_,_·______·_···_··__·__·_··.·.m__.....,._______ __,_..~_._._.__.__.____.._,____~.._ ____...____ t· .' " STNŒ OF CALIFORNIA Petc Wilscn, Covemor CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD - 1020 Ninth Street. Suite 100 @ Slaamcnto. California 9S8H -. ." i April 17, 1991 ..- ,. ,.. To All. cities and Counties: subject: compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for Source Reduction and Recycling,Elements (SRRES) , and Household Hazardous Waste Elements (HHWEs) The purpose of this letter is to remind all cities and counties which are lead age~cies as defined under public Resources Code (PRC) section 21067, that compliance with CEQA is necessary for approval of the SRREs and HHWEs. The Lead Agency concept is discussed in CEQA Guidelines section 15050. The SRREs and HHWEs fall under the definition of a "project" under CEQA Guidelines section 15378. A discretionary approval by local jurisdictions is required in order for an element to be incorporated into the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plans. The following steps'are necessary to ensure full compliance with CEQA: Notice of Early consultation; please send a copy to the Board. Preparation of a negative declaration or and environmental impact report; circulation of the draft environmental document through the state Clearinghouse for ,agency review - and comroent, Response to Comroents; please send a copy of response to comments to all comroenting agencies ! A Notice of Determination, filed with the county Clerk, must also be' sent to the State Clearinghouse Where two or more public agencies will be involved with a project, the determination of which agency will be the, Lead Agency shall be governed by criteria set forth ·in section 15051 of the CEQA Guidelines. It would be helpful if there was an executive sumroary ~efacing the elements clearly identifying the jurisdictions for" ith the elements were prepared. Each . jurisdiction identified is 'responsible for adopting the elements, and for properly filing its Notices of Determination with respective county clerks. . ~i ., )Lj--~ -, · ATTACHMENT B , negative declaration PROJECT NAME: Soµrce Reduction and Recycling Element and Household H$1rdous Waste Element PROJECT LOCATION: Ci~ide ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: Citiywide , PROJECT APPLICANT: Cit¡y of Chula Vista CASE NO: IS-95-12 DATE: November J5, 1994 A. Proiect Setting The project setting is Citywide. B. Proiect Descriotion The proposed project is the 19~4 revised final draft Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Househol~ Hazardous Waste Element. The SRRE is the City of Chula Vista's citywide plan to 'attain the mandated recycling goals of the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB939). Specifically, cities are required to adopt two "elements," one 4ddressing source reduction, recycling and composting programs (SRRE), and the other addressing the elimination of illegal disposal of household toxins (HHWE). Once adopted, the City "elements" are to be forwarded to the County for inclusion in! a Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP). The plan describes the source reduction, recycling and composting programs/strategies to implement the State mandated waste-to-landfill diversion rates of 25% by 1995 and 50o/o,.by the year 2000. The source reduction compon~nt of the SRRE targets those sources that make a substantial contribution to the waste stream, those that are easily diverted, and those that - promote an increased awarene~s of waste management issues. Examples of targeted wastes include organic grass/tree trimmings, junk mail and disposab!e goods such as diapers and razors for which longer lasting, reusable, or repairable alternatives are available. The proposed City programs in the short term will result in the diversion of 49% of the readily recyclable material that is currently being disposed. The City's -I- 11/ ,Jj ~{ft.. --.- p......~-..,;;: -- City of chula vista planning department CI1Y OF environmental review .ection CHULA Va. .-_..._..._.._----~.__._---_.~,--~-~~-~-----_.__._..- --~_._.__._-~._--~------- mediurn-tenn recycling objective is to capture 80% of the readily recyclable material that is currently being disposed. The recycling component of the SRRE targets include: paper, plastic, glass, metal, construction debris and yard waste. Other components, some of which have already been implemented: include the expansion of curbside recycling programs to mobile home parks, expansion of the City office recycling program, implementation of the business outreach program, encouragement of the purchase of recycled material products by the City of Chula Vista Purchasing Department, establishment of a waste exchange clearinghouse for local manufacturing businesses, and development and implementation of mandatory recycling programs. Composting is the second most critical component for achieving the mandated 25 to 50 percent diversion goals. The short-tenn composting objective is to remove at least 30 percent of the commercial, industrial and residential yard and wood wastestream. These objectives will be met by way of implementation of a mandatory yard diversion program and the implementation of a backyard composting program. Mediurn-tenn marketing activities include using the resulting soil amendment on City grounds and supplying existing distributors with quality material. The special waste component includes white goods, bulky items, grease, tires, automobile parts and bodies, and other metal wastes. In addition, the SRRE contains goals and objectives and implementation strategies for school/public education, facilities, funding, and diversification of waste management. The short-tenn City-specific objectives of (1991-1995) HHWE include: utilization and advertisement of pennanent facilities in San Diego County and the continuance of "in- house" and County-supplied education and public infonnation programs. The mediurn-tenn objectives (1996-2000) include the continuation of in-house and County-supplied education and public infonnation programs. C. Comoatibilitv with Zoning and Plans The adoption of the SRRE and HHWE is consistent with the City's General Plan. When specific facilities are proposed such as a waste transfer station, compatibility with the general plan and zoning ordinance will need to be detennined on a project-by- proj ect basis. -2- /1-/0 - D. Identification of Environmenta~ Effects An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached . Environmental Checklist Form) determined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. This Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. E. Mandatorv Findinl!s of Silmifi_ a, Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce th~ habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to dtop below self-sustaining levels" threaten to eliminate a plant or animal commut,ity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or! animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods or California h~story or prehistory? I , Comments: As the project is the adoption of policy, there are no site specific impacts. Therefore, the ¡project does not have the potential to reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. Individual projects will be reviewed on a site specific basis to deteI1I).ine if there is a potential to substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage 7 of long-term, environmental goals? I Comments: The adoption of the proposed project has the potential to achieve both short-term and Iqng-term environmental goals. Goals of the Source Reduction and Recycli~g Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element which include: source reduction, recycling and composting programs all have the potential to achieve short- and long-term environmental goals. c. Does the project have Impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considel:able when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of Other cu"ent projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) , Comments: The adoption of waste management policy will not have impacts ..; that are individually li1llited but cumulatively considerable. Specific facilities that may be proposed in the future such as a transfer station will undergo site- specific environmental review, d. Does the project have environmental effect which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? -3- /11-// ~- --.....-...---...---.- ------ Comments: The adoption of policy will potentially have beneficial environmental effects on human beings as the waste stream is diverted at source, and household and commercial products are recycled. F. Consultation 1. Individuals and Organizations City of Chula Vista: Barbara Reid, Planning Roger Daoust, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering - Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Bob Sennett, Planning Ken Larsen, Director of Building & Housing Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Crime Prevention, Mary Jane Diosdada Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Dept. Erik Basil, Acting Deputy City Attorney Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: City of Chula Vista Planning Department 2. Documents Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code Source Reduction and Recvcling Element. City of Chula Vista (1991) Household Hazardous Waste Element. City of Chula Vista (1991) 3. Initial Studv This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any , comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period for this Negative Declaration. The report reflects the independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding . the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910. -Kf ~~ (tf VJ ~"-'~ 'ENVIRON NTAL VIEW COO ATOR . (M''''.nd) -4- )7-J~/iV~ 77 APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE For Office Use ~ PLAN IS FOLDED TO m INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER Case No. IS- (6-1 'DpsL AmnL .(:j- . , Receipt No. INITIAL STUDY DaIC Re¢' d. - , Accepted by City of Chula Vista Project No. FA- Dpst. No, Applic~ol\ Form CIP No, ' A. BACKGROUND Sourc.e. R=!ut.,j-lDo'") w0. /2eC"1cl:Y\,5 RelalCd Case No. ~ I, Project Title ~-V1\- (S~E) o.nd ,"*,~hbd f-1<1~lt..d 2. . ).1)C\~e.. EI("'~"'dl-'~\kJ.E.3 1\'\ a..omp\IW'lce, wtt\ì ~ ~ PrOject LocatIon treet ad ss or escnpuon Q~- wiele. Assessors Book. Page & Parcel No. c.. tt...\ - \0 i de.. 3. Brief Project Description\¥'¢. ~,...òJW vJII\ -\~V\'-n\':t ~ 'SRE.f and '¡"¡W\\}(::; o.dq')kd hS) -tre (",.L. -f',-,ý"' U'1(Luc,lo-rI ~"'~- (,~"t'-\-\AJ·iÒR. ~*e~VCL-\-f>..cl \,v~e. \'Y\D..f\OWJ'ne.vl Ç)\~_.o"\ 4. Name of Applicant C·~ Dt ðlulo. \J,~ I 't\CW$\ln~ 1ß:t*. Address 1..-1(" 4t.h Avenue.. Fax# lð\\ -<?Il Phone I£A \- 510 L City r ..hLlþ \,',0\-a. State C:.Þ.. Zip cWìlD S. Name of Preparer/Agent s.~~'\ \.h.nc\.rev.J I &.x'oc.fl)-- '\2p-u! .,- C\ bove.. Address~C\ $-'\C.. c;¡ S Fax# Phone City State Zip Relation to Applicant 6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental Review Coordinator. a. Permits or approvals ~uired. General Plan Amendment _ ~sign Review Application _ Specific Plan _ RezonelPrezone _ Teþtative Subd. Map Conditional Use Pennit _ Grading Pennit _ Redevelopment Agency OPA - VarianCe - . _ Tentative Parcel Map _ ~velopment Agency DDA _ Coastal Development _ Site Plan & Arch. Review _ blic Project _ Other Pmnit _ Special Use Permit _ Amneutioo If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or rezone, please indicate the change in designation from to . b. Enclosures or documellls (as required by the Environmental'Review Cooniinator), _ Grading Plan Arch. EIevaticos _ HydrologiCll Study _ Parcel Map = Undscape Plans l4iological Study _ Precise Plan _ T~lative Subd. Map = Archaeological Study _ Specific Plan _ Improvement Plans Noise Assessment _ Traffic Impact Report _ SOils Repon - Other AgeDCy Permit _ Hazardous Waste Assessment _ Qeotecbnical Report z: Other /1/-)] b~ a.rf We... Sumrr1e:ty y WI'C;f:~021.A.93 (1IcI. 102O.93)(1IcI. 11122.93) ..... 1 - .' __,__~._____..__~__~_._._,.__..__""._ M_______..___,____."."_·~______·_· __..._.~_____ J 'J EXECUTIVE SUMMARY j This is a Slimmary of the Source Reduction ~ecYCling Element (SRRE) prepared for , j the City of Chula Vista by Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM) dated October 1991. The report is divided into the following ten sections: j. Statement of Goals and Objectives 1.0 j 2.0 Initial Solid Waste Generation Study 3.0 Source Reduction Component j 4.0 Recycling Component 5.0 Composting Component j 6.0 Special Waste Component 7.0 Education and Public Information Component :1 8.0 Facility Capacity Component 9.0 Funding Component J 10.0 Integration Component -:1 1.0 STATEMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES j This section provides a brief overview of the regulatory background that relates to the SRRE, as well as the goals and objectives of each component program that will help the J City of Chula Vista meet the mandated 25 and 50 percent diversion required by State Assembly Bill 939 and comply with the county mandatory recycling ordinance. Refer -=m to Table ES-l for a summary of component goals. j The short-term objectives of Chula Vista's source reduction program are to educate the public about source reduction activities and to modify city procurement policies, The ] medium-term objective is to encourage source reduction behavio~ through the use of public information and business outreach programs, economic incentives and rate jJ structure modifications, point-of-purchase signage, as well as the promotion of source reduction legislation. jJ 2209.OS3.YC-COITII2/CK\JVI VST/CK\JVI VST.PNL ES-l .~ Ii-I! ~ , i I Table £S-l I CITY OF CHULA VISTA S·" ~ '~y OF COMPONENT GOALS COMPONENT PROGRAM W ASTESTREAM REDUCTION Short-Term Medium- Tenn (1995) (ZOOO) ~ -,- :.:';, '.:..". '~;' Source Reduction 1 2 .:j'\ , Recycling Residential 6 11 Com mercial/lndiustrial 10 15 Composting 8 21 Special Waste 0 1 TOTAL 25 50 . - 2209 .œ3·Tc.corTII2/CH\IlÀ VST/cHuv. VST ,PNL ES-2 --- I'I~/') -------.-" --..---.--.". , The city's short-term recycling objective is to divert~9 per(;tnt of the readily recyclable material that is currently being disposed, primarily through the implementation of mandatory recycling programs for eaéh land use sector in compliance with the San Diego County mandatory recycling ordinance. The city's medium-term recycling objective is , to capture 80perc.:nt of the readily recyclable material that is currently being disposed. The city has also laid out some objectives for developing markets for recyclable material, including establishing a local waste excha¡'lge clearinghouse, attracting recycling firms lto the 10uthfÍiay and promoting the purchase of recycled materials by the public and private sectors, The city's short-term composting objective is to remove at least 30 percent of the , industrial, commercial and residential yard and wood waste stream. The medium-term compo sting objective is to remove at least 79 percent of the industrial, commercial and - ' residential yard and wood waste stream. The city will also provide market development assistance for compost and mulch and will use these products in city parks and open , , space areas. 1 The objective of Chula Vista's special waste program are to comply with the county , mandatory recycling ordinance, ensure proper handling and disposal (including adequate 1 disposal capacity), and where feasible minimize, r~use and recycle all special wastes n generated within the jurisdiction. More specifically, the short-term objectives include continuing the recycling of asphalt and composting of sewage sludge, continued ] sponsoring of citywide garage sales and community cleanups, and encouraging the use of retreaded tires. , ] 2.0 INITIAL SOLID WASTE GENERATION STUDY ., ] The Solid Waste Generation Study is divided into three subsections and includes ] descriptive information about the City of Chula Vista, current solid .waste practices, current and projected solid waste,quantities, and disposal stream composition data. ] 2209.053.TCCOITII2ICKULA VST/CKULA VST.PNL ES-3 1 Fl--J t , i -' The City of Chula Vista contracts with Laidlaw Waste Systems to provide solid waste collection and disposal services for all residential, commercial, industrial and other waste generators within the city limits. The waste material is hauled to the Otay Landfill located in southwestern San Ditgo County, east of Interstate 805 and north of Otay Valley Road. The landfill is owned by San Diego County and operated by Herzog Contracting Corporation. ) Diversion practices in 1990 in the City of Chula Vista included all material that is picked , , â \,1 1\"" ./ up by th "reS1ðential curbside program, taken to drop-off and buy-back centers, donated ! r<J} ?~ t, j' / to nonprofit organizations for recycling or reuse, and salvaged by scrap dealers. The , estimated diversion through rec)'c1ing activities is approximately 2442.6 tons per year for L "- - -- f> a total recycling rate of 1.3 percent., In addition, Chula Vista's residential curbside 1 :-:cycling program, which began in 1991, diverted an average of 274 tons of recyclables ~. (, ". ¡"-, j./~'~' per month between February a¡¡d June, 1991. ;{ Although there are no composting facilities within the jurisdiction, the city's sewage 'Î ~! sludge is being composted on Fiesta Island, diverting 11,315 tons of material away from ",disposal. In 1990, source reduction, recycling, and composting activities provided the ... City of Chula Vista with a diversion rate of approximately~7.2 percent. ¥ \-- ---- ; The determination of a per capita solid waste generation rate provides a numerical value which can be applied to population increases to project future solid waste qu~tities. The City of Chula Vista has a basb year waste disposal 0(7.3 ~pj!!\J>.c:;-~~ Waste disposal projections (without increasing diversion rates) for the short- and medium-term planning periodS are provided in Table ES-2. Quantitative field analysis methodology was used to characterize the waste categories and .. waste types generated by the City of Chula Vista. The results of the waste sampling are provided in Table ES-3. ~ 2209.053- TCCOITIIVCIIIII-" VST/CIIIII-" VST.PNL ES-4 /1-/7 -_._---_.~_._------- -------~---~-_._--_.- J!1 ] Table FS-2 n CITY OF CßULA VISTA , POPULATION AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL PROJECTIONS ~ WASTE QUANTITY YEAR POPULA TlON1 (TONS/YEAR) J1 1990 , 135,163 180,071 . 1991 137,863 183,668 ] 1992 140,563 187,265 ,] 1993 143,263 190,862 1994 145,963 194,459 11 1995 148,663 198,056 1996 150,691 200,758 ] 1997 152,719 203,460 1998 154,747 206,162 ¡ J 1999 156,775 208,863 2000 158,803 211,565 J 2001 160,211 213,441 2002 161,619 215,317 J 2003 163,027 217,193 J 2004 164,435 219,069 2005 165,843 220,944 J 2006 167,253 222,822 I , The San Diego Association of Governments Series 7 forecasts for 1990, 1995, J 2000 and 2006 were revised specifically for preparation of the San Diego County Source Reduction and Recycling Elements. This revision incorporates 1990 J census figures, series 7 growth rates and current trends in housing completions. ] .3 2209.053- TC.corfll2lCHULA VST/CHULA VST.PNL ES-5 Jt///7 . J -----------..-..-- _..._._....~.- D Table ES-3 If CITY OF CHULA VISTA n SOLID WASTE CQMPOSITION SUMMARY Percent II Waste San Marcos S)'camore Ota)' Miramar Total (..,) Component Cardboard 0.0 0.0' 12006.3 10.2 12016.5 6.7 U 0.0 Newspaper 0,0 8133.6 4.5 8138.1 4.5 [ Mixed Paper 0.0 0.0 11585.1 9.2 11594.3 6.4 " " HB Ledger 0.0 0.0 2578.6 1.4 2580.1 1.4 Glass 0.0 0.0' 4748.2 4.3 4752.5 2.6 [, Film Plastic 0.0 0.0 3565.4 2.6 3568.0 2.0 Hard Plastic 0.0 0.0 4357.7 2.9 4360.6 2.4 [ Diapers 0.0 0.0 3809.4 0.0 3809 .4 2.1 Otber Misc.· 0.0 0.0 58744.2 29.0 58773.1 32.7 t Tin Cans 0.0 0.0 2175.1 0.0 2175,1 1.2 Aluminum Cans 0.0 0.0 401.3 0.5 401.8 0.2 [C Yard Waste 0.9 111.7 31162.2 18.1 31298.1 17.4 Wood Waste 0.7 26,9 17418.2 11.3 17456.3 9.7 Concrete 0.6 25,.0 1133.4 33.9 1192.4 0.1 Asphalt 0.1 2,9 59.8 2.1 64.8 0.0 DirtlRock/s.nd 0.9 12P.O 3113.4 73.4 3315.9 1.8 Roofing 0.1 44·8 652.5 0.6 697.9 0.4 Drywall ' 0.2 22.1 457.6 1.2 481.0 0.3 Mixed 2.4 454.9 12478.0 90.6 13023.5 1.2 Construction Special Wastes 0.0 0.0 286.2 0.0 286.2 0.2 Total 6.0 823.4 178866.2 295.9 179991.4 100.0 . "Other Misc." category is equivalent to "non-ferrous". "natural" and "synthetic textiles", .organics., "residuals·. ·putre.sciblcs·, -..lvage/composite" and "inert materials· çate¡orics. . - 2209.053.TC.cofTII2/CI!\JUI VST/CI!\JUI VST.I'II\.. ES-6 J~'//I - ~-_.__._,- ~.~--- ----- ,.--.----......-- -~_. _._._...._._,~ ,---.'--.--- ] 1 , ¡, 3.0 SOURCE REDUCTION COMPONENT -4 - j Source reduction programs typically focus on: :: · [reducing use of non-recyclable materials , - ffei>lacing disposable with reusable materials · , m · ,reducing packaging , ~. J v · reducing amount of yard waste generated 1:\ purchasing repairable products and recycled products · ~ · increasing the efficiency of the use of materials 11 j Source reduction program alternatives were evaluated according to the folIowing criteria: · Effectiveness in reduction of waste ) 'j · Hazards created · Ability to accommodate change j · Consequences on the waste (Le. shifts) · Whether can be implemented in short- and medium-term planning periods. j · Need for expanding/building facilities · Consistency with local conditions J · Institutional barriers to implementation j · Estimate of costs · Availability of end uses of diverted materials j The program and implementation schedule in Table ES-4 is recommended for the City of Chula Vista. , J j j D09.053.TC-corr/12/CHIJlJ\ VST/CHIJlJ\ VST.PNL ES-7 J /'-/";J-O ',I ¡ I I , '4.0 RECYCLING COMPO!jlENT ¡ , 4.1 PRIORITY WASTE T\1ES i ¡ I ~ The general waste categories that will be targeted as part of Chula Vista's recycling ~ , - program are paper, plastic, .glass, metal, construction debris, and yard waste. The -. . f~ targeted percentages for recpvery for the short- and medium-term objectives are to -". . :.:.:. remove 49 percent of the materials identified for recycling by 1995 and 80 percent by .. "' the year 2000. . 4.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The City of Chula Vista has \lad a citywide residential curbside coUection program since February, 1991 (a pilot program started in 1989). Current participation rates are '.(' approximately 82 percent of all the single family and multi-family households that receive ,\ ,:\ curbside solid waste coUection. Material recovery has averaged 274 tons per month. The city's internal office recycling program diverted over 17,000 pounds of recyclables between 1uly and September, 1991. The city has a number of ongoing recycling programs for the various land use sectors in the city. Current city programs for the residential sector include annual citywide garage sales, quarterly community clean-ups in targeted neighborhoods, and an extensive public information campaign, a block captain program, and curbside coUection of recyclables. Ongoing programs target~ for the commercial and industrial sector include the development of a busine~ recycling, data base, targeting of businesses for the ,.v·\·d development of office source reduction programs, (business recycling outreach prográm), and the recycling of asphalt, and composting of yard waste from city operations, The 1 ¡ Love a Clean San Diego øw¡YP has developed an disseminated a School curriculum which addresses recycling, source reduction and composting. This group-also offers a hot line ~~, service which anyone in the,county may call with recycling questions. The city has been if 2209 .OS3- TC.cofTII2lCHUl-' VST/CHUl-' VST.PNL ES-8 1'-/--;2/ ---- ...--'..,--.-....-. .-.._---------~~-_.~---_.~------------.~ ____._.___n___~____~__ ] · l participating on a Technical Advisory Committee (T AC) of key county and city staffs J (from allover the county) and solid waste consultants. The T AC was formed to address countywide ootid waste issues and meets twice a month. J 4.3 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ì -' · Alternative recycling programs were evaluated according to the same criteria listed for . 1 source reduction alternatives. The alternatives and issues evaluated included: · Source separation J · Residential curbside collection · Drop-off centers j · Buy-back centers · Scheduled collection · J · Central processing facilities · Materials recovery facilities j - low technology J - medium technology - high technology j · Marketing of recyclables · 1 Another approach at addressing the requirements of AB 939 is through the development of a regional MRF, that would be operated in conjunction with the Prison Industry J Authority (PIA). The PIA proposes a 1000 ton per day waste recycle energy plant that would use inmate labor from the Donovan Correctional Facility. The goal of this J program is multifaceted. The inmates would separate recyclable materials from the mixed municipal solid wastestream. The organic fraction of the wastestream, in turn, · i would be used to produce electricity and steam using biogas produced through anaerobic digestion. In segregating the recyclables from the remainder of the wastestream, the PIA J proposed using a series of mechanical and handsorting operations that would allow for the separation of paper, glass, aluminum, plastic, ferrous metal, wood, and related J 2209 ,053.TC.corTIl2JCHuu. YSTICJ{UU VST.PNL ES-9 J PI ~ J- c?- · ~ , U materials. The organic, or non-recyclable portion of the solid waste stream, would be anaerobically digested, in conjunctiqn with sewage generated by the prison, This process rr would provide steam and electri9l energy for the prison facilities, as well as the availability of electricity for sale to local utility users. [ This project is only in the formative stages and the impact that the PIA program will IT have on the overall SRRE approach, in terms of scope and time of implementation, must still be identified. [ 4.4 PROGRAM SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION [ The backbone of Chula Vista's short-term recycling program is the planned & implementation of mandatory recy¢ling for all land use sectors (single family residential, multi-family residential, industrial and commercial/public uses) according to the schedule ~ established by the San Diego CO\¡lnty mandatory recycling ordinance. The details for each of these programs are still µnder evaluation by the city. Chula Vista will also t "j _r , " / establish a business recycling outreach program, a waste exchange program, and a backyard composting program. The city's in-house office recycling program will be ~ expanded. The city's recycling program also includes the encouragement of recycling companies to locate their operatiQns within the city and an extensive public information 1 j \) nd education campaign. A comprehensive listing of the various aspects of Chula Vista's I I recycling program and a schedul~ for implementation are provided in Tables ES-5 and ¡ ES-6. In addition, the County of San Diego is planning an extensive public information \ campaign in conjunction with implementation of the County Mandatory Recycling , ~rj Ordinance. ~""', , J , , ¡. - 4.5 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION The programs and implementati(j)n listed in Tables ES-5 and ES-6 arç recommended for Chula Vista to achieve the mandated diversion goals. . :no9.053.TC.corr/12/C1111LA VSTICIII1LA VST.Jtn, ES-IO /L/~02J __..__.... "0'-- ______._________ _ _______ ." ----. -~.__.._-------------- --- "~i' I t ,I Table ES-4 ¡ CITY OF CHULA VISTA SOURCE REDUCTION COMPONENT SHORT-TERM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Þ..ctivity Completion Date J. In(onnation and Public Education Continue civic center IOUrce reduction/recyc1in¡ program Ongoing (J Conlumer public education program Ongoing CD Conlinue bUline.. ICCyeling outreach prolil!l""y";: (') Ongoing -0 Õ Implement poînt-of·purchue .i¡nage :¡ - 2. City LcaderthiP Lbbby Cor ltate legislltion Ongoing Develop and implement city procurement ordinance lune 1992 3. Rate Structure Modifications (. It Evaluate variable can rate program December 1993 r. , Sponsor community cleanups and citywide garage sa1e QUlrterlylannulUy ~ - .. Technical Assistance " j Apply for TAP Grant for waste exchange program and continuing business recycling outreach and ei 'j, ItAtll rat} e~'6 t'IU5Ialll:t October 1991 - ., Develop anJ imp1ement city waste exchange program or cstAblish cooperation with state program lunc 1992 ( Implement backyard compo.ting program November 1991 \: ( ( 6. Monitorin~ II ~ · Establish bu~i"~S5 Source ReductionfRccycling database October 1991 ( Medium· Tenn activities will be established based upon the result of the programs and activities conducted during the Ihort-tom period. , : ( ( C · . ~ · l . - 2209.053·TC.coITII2JCIIIIlA VST/CIIIIlA VST ,FNL ES-ll . J~/;2 i I, I / 1 I Table ESoS CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECYCLING COMPONENT SHOR1!;TERM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Atti.ity Projetted Date _ 1. City Mandalorv Recvc1ind Ordinance ~ I &Þ 0 Ordinance dr1lfted November 1991 ~ I '1 Ordinance enacted March I, 1992 :. ¡ l' 2. Residential Rc.C'vc1in~ Pm2nms ,~: . Implement backyard conjposting pilot program November 1991 'J ,\'"01 Continue block captain program Ongoing ,.;;¡ ~~.:1 Continue to promote and expand single family curbside collection of Ongoing :;v rccye1ablcl 'z~ ".'j Decision on type of RFP for collection/composting of yard waste November 1991 .\1 Î~-,';- I Issue RFP for residential yard waste collection March 1992 I' :",' Residential yard waste contract award July 1992 ~. ,,_. Enforcement of yard waste collection program January 1993 ~;'...' Delcnnine approach to muhi.famil)' residential recycling program January 1992 :~..:~. Multi-family recycling contract award (if appropriate) July 1992 ..r'"' :.~-'";. ,','<; : Implement multi.family recycling program (enforce mandatory ~1'~ recycling) July I, 1993 :'f,...: . :.... :'\''0 , Continue to lpon.or cÐmmunity cleanup. Quarterly ,'.",1', , .....-; .. .;~: . Continue to lpon.or .~ywide garage sale. Annually ".j'l " ._ :,:. Begin enforcement of mandatory .ingle family recycling March 1992 J:':l:-:' , .r: J i f !::~~j '<'~"~, . .'~~ r'.t.:'~ .... ¥. ·~-t' .~tj ',,'..,~ ........ .- .:¡.'..~: ,':(:;.Î-,.. :'1..:;'.;...: .,'~,~",,~., - ,. ~...,.,.~, .............. ~.:-,,%:~(;' :),..t}!~ "':~,;" :..,"',...., I ;'''';)~,'',':'':,'_'::~Z''¡ \ 22Q9,OS3.Tc.corrll1/CKULA VST/à/ULA VST.PNt. ES-12 ~~:t:¡;(~ 25 ,~~ !/j~ ~_~:- '_~ 7 \'.. ..- - ,,'<¡;. .,,,:;',~~A .--.--..~--_._--~ _ _ ~_ __._._. w .._.__....._____. ----....-.---------..- .".-------.--.- · ~ Table ES-S (coD'I) CITY OF CHULA VISTA -" RECYCLING COMPONENT SHORT·TERM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AdI.ity Projected Date 3. Commercial/Office Rccvc1in2 Pro2rams J Apply for county TAP grant to conûnu~y...ffioe~g and ()çtober 1991 , bUlinea. outreach programs , Continue to expand city office program and bu.ine.. outreach Ongoing program Develop a recycling data bue Ongoing D'ctcnnine approach Lo commerçial recycling program January 1992 Commercial recycling contracl award (if appropriate) July 1992 Begin enforcement of mandatory commercial recycling July 1993 Begin enforcement of mandatory industrial recycling October 1992 Establish waste e.change program June 1992 4. Draft a rec:VClin2 desi2n ordinance for IDace .Uoeation January 1992 2209.053· TC.coITIl2lCHULA VSTICHtJu. VST.PNL ES-13 /i~ 2? .. ~'l " :>- Table ES-4í CITY OF CIIULA VISTA RECYCLING COMPONENT MEDIUM-TERM IMPLEMENTATION SCIIEDULE ....Ii.ity Projected Date -. 1. Commercial/Office and Industrial Rccvclin¡! Pro2rams ~( " Evaluate existing pro¡ram Ie.fCeçtiveneas '~ June 1995 ~ Evaluate possible equipmentJpropm chang.. July 1995 - 2. Residential Curbside MulÜ-Material Reçvclin2 Pr02nms ;.''",¡ Evaluate e>Wting propm, eff..,tiveness May 1995 ,.. "'¡o! . Eyaluate possible program change. May 1995 " j .--' 3. Pilot Mu1li~Familv RccvcHn2 Pr02ram ~ ~. ij Evaluate mulli-family rec¡¡cling program eff.."iveness January 1996 Evaluate pollible prograrrl change. January 1996 ~ ~ "- 4. Materials Recoverv Facilitv i ~ Evaluate city's success in attracting MRFs to the area and evaluate May 1995 Ibe need for additional fa.¡¡¡ti.. ~j 5. Transfer Fa.::i1itv J:-i ~~,' -"'. Consider cooperation with county transfer facilities (currently in the July 1995 - planning proc...) ..:...' ·f;~ "-"'¡( 6. Education and Public Infcbnnation --t;.~ ,(,', '~f. AIscII effectiveness of ù1formation program January 1995 ~r; :.;..~ Modify infonnational materials in combination with programmatic Ongoing ,":; ;.'.... changes ~-..: . '- ~2~ "f·" ~. . '\~~ ~ ~_ h "'" ,jt~ 1 ~. ~ ~" ~'>~ . ~ ..I._j ~,."~ ES-14 :..,~o;j 2109 .OS3- Tc-corfll2/CIiUlJI VST/CIiUlJI VST.PN\. '~~ ~ ~, J2j/J-7 " ------- -- ~--- ~--- -- -~---- - --.--..------------ ...-...-..--.. '11'-- ;'.,.." ' ',;¡;,'j,' !"..;'¡ ,4',5 MONITORlNG AND EVALUATION In order to assess the effectiveness of a residential recycling program, it is essential to gather and evaluate a variety of operational data. The key items to be monitored are: , · Set-out rates · Participation rates · Recovery quantities · Materials capture rates · Compliance with processing specifications (e.g. level of contamination, minimum quantities) · Vehicle performance and collection , · Costs and revenues In the short-term, the commercial and industrial recycling programs will be based on voluntary participation with guidance and direction from city staff. When mandatory recycling goes into effect, businesses may still be allowed to make their own recycling arrangements with permitted haulers. Therefore, in order to assess the effectiveness of a commercial/industrial recycling program, it is essential to work closely with the business community in establishing and measuring program effectiveness. The items that can be monitored include: . · Material capture rates (number of traBer pulls and tonnage records) ., · Periodic commercial/industrial establishment surveys (e.g., in conjunction with business license renewals, as the city recently began to require) · Commercial waste stream audits 2209.0.13- TC.corJ'll2lCllllU\ vS'r ICIIIIU\ VST.PNL ES-lS )'/-;;,25' '\ - 5.0 COMPOSTING COMPONENT : 5.1 EXISTING CONDJTIOIiS According the 1990 waste c~aracterization study, approximately 27 percent of Chula Vista's disposal stream is composed of yard and wood wastes. The city does not have a comprehensive yard and wood waste composting program at the present time. The Chula Vista Public Works Department is mulching yard waste from city parks and pub1ic green open spaces. Some mulching also occurs at the Otay Landfill where Chula Vista's yard waste is disposed, but it is not known how much of Chula Vista's yard waste is being mulched. In addition, sewage sludge from Chula Vista is being composted on Fiesta Island (see Section 6.0 of this Executive Summary). 5,2 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Compo sting alternatives were evaluated according to the criteria listed for source reduction alternatives. The $.1ternatives evaluated included: . Waste storage/collection - source' separation/collection - commjngled collection - mechanical separation - mixed solid waste composting . Feedstocks , - high carbon/low moisture - high nitrogen/high moisture - 7209 .OS)· TC.corTIl VCII1IUI VSTIC1f1JI.À VST.PNL ES-16 ) Lj~c2 / ---"~"'-"-'-"---------~--- --- .---- .-- _....,,---~- , I"~ :: . . Composting technologies - preprocessing - - aerated static pile - in-vessel - windrow/static pile " . Program scale , (I ( - - local ~ ! - - subregional - - regional /'*' í . Marketing and distribution t · C - local c , ( - bulk sales to wholesalers . I - turnkey contract I , I , 5.3 PROGRAM SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION \' ' I .f +~_-' c-' , (I ( L \ The selection of a composting progran{has been based upon the objectives previously , · ,/ i defined; consideration of existing conditions in Chula Vista; the requirements of the I I ~ county mandatory recycling ordinance; and the need to maintain program flexibility. The composting programs and implementation schedules planned for the City of Chula Vista I are preSented in Tables ES-7 and ES-8. 1 , 5.4 MONITORING AND EVALUATION . · The monitoring of the composting program will be closely linked with th~ recycling progr~m and parameters will be similar. , I 2209.053.TC-C01Tl12/<:H\J\-" VST/<:H\J\-" VST ,PNL ES-17 · )t//30 t 6.0 SPECIAL WASTE COMPONENT I: 6.1 TARGETf.D_MAJERIALS Arm ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION It SpeciaJ wastes are materiaJs that reqjuire speciaJ handling or disposal because of physical, It chemical, or biological characteristics. Most of this materiaJ cannot be diverted and will [ continue to be disposed in an en~irl:mmenta1ly sound manner (e.g. asbestos, street sweepings, and infectious waste). I Septic tank pumpings and incinerator ash are not It generated in Chula Vista, Auto I¡!odies and grease trap pumpings are aJready being diverted. .Only those speciaJ waste types with feasible new diversion aJternatives were It evaJuated. These include sewage sludge (existing diversion), white goods/bulky items, construction/demolition debris, anc\ used tires. m . 6. 1.1 SEW AGE SLUDGE m The San Diego County Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Facility (Metro) is [ responsible for treating and disposing of Chula Vista's sewage sludge. Digested sludge from the Metro facility is air dried, at Fiesta Island in Mission Bay. The dried sludge is It shipped to a private contractor, qorona Chino Farms. Chula Vista's sewage sludge generation is estimated at 11,315 tons per year, for which Chula Vista has taken existing [ diversion credit. ¡ m 6.1.2 USED TIRES ¡ . m Used tires create a number of problems when buried in landfills. Alternatives available for used tire diversion include incineration, retreading, and crumb. rubber uses. .[ I However, due to air quality problems, potentiaJ health hazards and the .Iack of end uses, none of these aJternatives are currently considered viable for the diversion of significant m , quantities of tires away from landfill disposal. The city will reevaJuate tbese aJternatives m at the medium-term planning stage. 2209.05). TC.coTr/12/CIIUlJ< VST/CIIUlJ< VST.PNL ES-18 n /1/] ! ! r - .._----------~--_._~-~--,._----_._----_._----_.- ] ] Table ES- 7 ] - CITY OF CHULA VISTA '1 COMPOSTING COMPONENT SHORT-TERM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE .- ACTIVITY PROJECTED DATE 1 J 1. ContinuOOs Composting of S~wage Sludge. Ongoing .J ;,/ ,~I,."-J ] 2. Draft City Recycling/Composting Ordinance and November 1991 City Procurement Ordinance. ] 3. Backyard Composting Program a: Implement pilot program. November 1991 b. Expand program. 1992-1995 ] 4. Residential Yard Waste CoJlection/Composting ] Program / a. RFP decision. November 1991 br-- ,-Issue'1'equesr for proposals. November 1991- ] c. Begin public education. December 1991 d, ___Begin-greens~Jlection.·- January 199~ e. Enforce mandatory yard waste separation. January 1993 ] 5. Commercial/Industrial Composting . u~~- a. Continue business outreach projrarn. Ongoing ] b. Begin enforcement of mandatory industrial recyc1 ing/ composting. October 1992 / c. Determine whether to issue an RFP for 1 v commercial recyc1ing/composting. November 1991 Y.'CC, .J d. Issue RFP C ~ ð'ftlt!l¡" , :;.: (. ) April 1992 e. Begin enforcement of mandatory Jf commercial recyc1ing/composting. July 1993 6. Eastlake Composting Facility Pilot Program Ongoing ] 7. Compost Marketing a. Continue to use compost on city-owned d~t J parks, golf course and landscaped areas. Ongoing b. Assist composting contractors in J identifying end use markets in Chula Vista and in pursing those markets. 1992-1994 J 2209 .OS3- TC..corrl12JCHULA YST/CHU1.A VST .PNL ES-19 JiI-3;2 J T' _..-~--_.- , I' I Table ES-8 CHULA VISTA CO~STlNG COMPONENT MEDItJl\l-TE IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AC11YITY PROJECTED DATE 1. Evaluate Effectivenes$ of Residential, Industrial January 1995 . and Commercial Cotriposting Programs 2, Modify Programs as Needed to Improve June 1995 Effectiveness, Including Public Information ". Materials/Methods 3. Expand Programs to Include Other Organic 1995-1999 Wastes (e.g., food waste) and Other End Uses (e.g., farm uses) 4. Continue to Expand End Use Markets for the 1995-1999 Compost 5. Require Large Scale Planned Developments in the 1995-1999 City to Provide Internal Yard Waste Collection/Composting and Use Own Compost 6. Consider Participation in Sub-Regional and Ongoing Regional Composting Programs I 7. Continue Composting of Sewage Sludge Ongoing , , , " , \ " , I,: I , ,I - " \: I 2209.053- Tc-corr/lVCIIUlA VST/CII\1IJ. VST.PNL ES-20 )1/ /J3 ---.---- --------,-~---,,- _..~-~..._--- I: . 6.1.3 WHITE GOODS/BULKY ITEMS - White goods include items such as refrigerators, air conditions, washers, dryers and other ,. bulky appliances. Under the County Mandatory Recycling Ordinance, these are targeted materials for recycling in the residential and commercial sector. The City of Chula Vista t will continue to sponsor annual citywide gara~e sales and quarterly community cleanups. t1 ( The city will also include information about options for the sale or donation of used items ë 'j - as part of its public education program. ? L-è, '-- 1.:JvJ . 6.1.4 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLmON DEBRIS r ( ( The major options for this special waste category include the reuse and recycling of ( . concrete, asphaJt, dirt, rock, sand, land clearing brush, and scrap metal. These materials ( I are targeted for industrial recycling under the county mandatory recycling ordinance. The major methods of asphalt recycling are cold or hot recycling. Concrete, sand, rock, ". , dirt and metal recovered from construction and demolition activities can be reused as subgrade material. Land clearing brush can be mulched or composted. There will be more economic incentives to take clean construction land demolition material to private ! recyclers as landfill tipping fees increase, 6.2 PROGRAM SELECTION AND IMPLEMENT A TION , Ii :1 The selection of a special waste program has been based upon the objectives defined in Section 3.0 of this Executive Summary. The special waste program and schedule planned for Chula Vista are summarized in Table ES-9. ,"1 :I209.053·Tc.corT/12JCH1.IU. VSTICH1.IU. VST.PHI. ES-2l /tj/ J1 . .' I - f 7.0 EDUCATION AND PuBLIC INFORMATION ¡ 7.1 EXISTINQ...r~ The City of Chula Vista has a mulû-faceted educaûon and public informaûon program that includes flyers, brochures, a recycling hot line, media releases and interviews, and public presentaûons, The dty is beginning its business outreach and backyard composûng programs with associated fliers and contacts through working with the local chamber of commerce and ¡local garden clubs. The I Love a Clean San Diego . organizatiqn also has ongoing public educaûon and information programs. 7.2 SELECTION OF ALT$NATIVES I , The best overall strategy is a' comprehensive mix of techniques that includes: Public Education ! · Direct mailing of brochures and newsletters to city residents and , businesses. , · Canvassing at stores and residences door-to-door. ¡ · Targeted brochures to households whose first language is not English. , 'i · Public service announcements on local television and radio stations. · Community leader presentations at civic, neighborhood, church, social service and business organization meetings. , · Information booths at shopping malls and community events. ., · Recycling classes and field trips as part of school curriculum for grades one through 12. · Speaker's bureau of experts, public officials, and oth!í' informed persons that would be available to make presentations on recycling. 2:I09.OS3-Tc-corr/12lCIIVLA VST/CI!1JI.AVST .FNl ES-22 !;j~3~ ---_._.~.__.~-"~_.~-,-_._~_._-_._._----_.~---" -----,--_._.__._--~ ----.... -. .-. 1 J . · Promotions and Events · · Promote a recycling day or recycling week. · - · Sponsor recycling contests among schools, youth groups, civic groups or , neighborhoods. J ] · Recycling awards to individuals, neighborhoods, businesses and community organizations. , 1 · Encourage Christmas tree recycling or use of live trees. · Hold specific material recycling drives and citywide garage sales. J .. Obtain celebrity spokespersons. 1 · Continue to offer a reduced recycling service fee to senior citizens and low income households. 1 · Continue to run block captain program. ; ~ Publicity and Reminders · Advertisements in newspapers, on bil1boards and buses, in grocery stores ] and community centers. · Canvassing at stores and residences door-to-door. ] · Press releases and interviews for articles in local newspapers and m magazines and local news television broadcasts. · Posters, bumper stickers. 1 · Caps, buttons, t-shirts. 1 · Point-of-purchase signage. · Messages on shopping bags. 1 · Notices on utility bil1s. 1 · Telephone surveys. 1 2209 .053·Tc.corTll2ICHIJI.A VSTICHIJLA VST.PNL ES-23 1 Jt)rJb ---. -- -.. ---.-...-- . Radio and television public service announcements shared among neighboring cities. . Participation in loca1 TV and radio talk shows. 7.3 PROGRAM IMPLEME~ A TION Implementation of the public ed¡¡cation/information program should begin within the first month of each recycling program phase or approach. It is recommended that the city initiate each program with an extensive four month education campaign in which . . newsletters and brochures are sent to explain the programs. It is also recommended that the city hòld several public discussions in which residents come to voice their opinions about the programs, Tables ES-IO and ES- I I outline the proposed tasks and schedules for short- and medium-term implementation of Chula Vista's education and public information programs. 7.4 MONITORING AND EVALUATION , Monitoring and evaluation of the public information program will be closely linked with monitoring of other program components and will particularly focus on: · Public awareness · Participation rates · Material capture rates · Buyback center receipts and expenditures . - 2209.053-Tc.comIVCIi\JI-" VST/CIi\JI-" VST.PNL ES-24 pI'S? - - ---- ;,', , I I . TABLE ES-9 \ - CITY OF CHULA VISTA Special Waste Component ij bnplemenlaûon Schedule Activity Projected Date Short-Term Task , I. Enforce County Mandatory Recyclin¡ Ordinance (includes aome special wastes) a. Single family residential March 1992 b, Industrial October 1992 c. Multi-family July 1993 / residential/commercial 1 2. Continue private sector reporting Ongoing , I requirements for special wastes 3. Continue to sponsor annual citywide Ongoin¡ garage sales and quarterly community clean-ups 4. investigate second use markets for used April 1992 tires, demolition waste, rubber and grease trap pumpings as part of the city's business outreach and waste exchange program. 5. Continue to recycle asphalt from city , street demolition/maintenance Ongoing 6. Encourage the siting of additional January 1994 construction demolition recyclers in the city. Medium-Term Task 1. Evaluate special waste diversion January 1995 pro¡ress 2. Evaluate private sector reporting January 1995 methods , 3. Consider a co<omposting program January 1995 (yard waste and sewa¡e sludge) 4. Evaluate business outreach and waste January 1995 . exchange programs 1 ES-25 2'109 ,0\3· TC·COITI12ICHUI.A VSTICHULA VST, I'NL . /'/-3'(( ! . , l. [ Table ES-l0 City of Chula Vista [ ~DUCATION AND pUBLIC INFORMATION SHORT-TltRM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Activity Projected Date l I. Mandatorv Recvclin2 Pro2raq)~Soecific Activities l Promote Backyard CompostÎng November 1991 j Follow-up Public Informatio~ and Workshops December 1991 -1 , l Promote Yard Waste CollectipD Pro¡ram November 1992 Follow-up Public Information and Workshops February 1993 Promote Commercial Recycling Ongoing l Promote Multi-Family Recycling May 1993 Follow-up Puhlic Information and Workshops (Commercial and August 1993 Multi-Family) Promote Industrial RecyclinS Ongoing Follow-up Public Information and Worksbops November 1992 2. General Public Education Newslellers and Direct Mailin¡ Ongoin¡ Public Service Announcements Ongoing Promote School Curriculum Changes Ongoing Community Speakin¡ EngaSements Ongoing Develop NOD-Engiish Materials and Announcements March 1992 2. Promotions and Events Continue Special Rates for :Seniors and Low Income Housebolds Ongoing Recyclin¡ Events Yearly Citywide Garage Sale Aueust Christmas Tree Recycling Pro¡ram . January Competitions and Awards Yearly 3. General Publicitv and Reminders Develop and Conduct Community Survey 1992, 1994 News Releases Ongoing . - Radio, TV, Newspaper and Magazine Interview and Ads Ongoing 2209.053-TC.coITII2JCH\1\-' VSTICH\1\-' VST.FN\. ES-26 ! /t/~]( I ~-------------_._- -~------ -- ---- ---.----.--., ----.---..--- . - , Table ES-ll . City or Chola Vista EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INFORMATION COMPONENT MEDIUM-TERM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Acti.ity Projected Date 1. Public Education - Evaluate and update material for public distribution Ongoing Medium-term program kick-<>ff and existing program effectiveness update August, 1995 , , 2. Promotions and Events · Evaluate and update yearly promotion events Yearly · - Target-group programs Ongoing .., · I 3. Publicitv and Reminders - · Recirculate community surveys . 1996, 1998 · Radio and television public service announcements and features On¡oin¡ - Evaluate staffin¡ requirements . -' May, 1995 .., J ~ I .' J :; 2209 .os3· TC.cofT/12ICHUV, VSTICHIJv. VST .PNL ES-27 J "1 ¡tJ-t!tJ [L 8.0 FACILITY CAPACITY - [l The City of Chula VisL'I currently disposes of most of its municipal solid waste at the IT Ì; Otay Landfill, which can be divided into the Otay Landfill and the Otay Annex Landfill. ,..-- The county of San Diego expects to submit a closure plan for these landfills during the \ 1:- latter part of 1991, although the actual closures of these landfills are not expected to "'- ;¡ occur during the SRRE planning periQd. The cities realize the imponance of minimizing ~- the quantity of solid waste deposited in the county's landfills in order to extend the life [- of the facilities. Towards addressing the potential future usefulness of the existing landfills, \he county is proposing to expand the San Marcos Landfill and the Ramona [ Landfill. 9.0 FUNDING COMPONENT C This section covers typical component facility costs and program funding alternatives [ available to the city. The capitaJ and annual operating costs associated with the various [ SRRE components are estimated in Table ES-12. [ Funds for future SRRE programs wi\l come from any or a combination of the following sources: C · Recycling surcharge at disposal facilities in the form of tipping fee r: L;- increases · Establish residential recycling surcharge fees for collection L · Commercial/industrial recycling ~TVice fees · Variable rate structure [ ., · Business license fees · County and state grants [ · Market development and materials revenue - [ 21C9.053.TC.COITl12/CI/IJUI VST/CI/IJUI VST.PNL ES-28 IT ;,-/¿L/ / [ ~- -----_._'"--_..~..__..._----"--------,......_.._'".,--------.--- ---.-......-----. .-----.-......-..,..-....------.--- -- -------.------. ] ] 'j ~~ ~ ~ ~.. ] .... 0 ...... § ¡"II) N § :Æ~~ ~8 '" s ..¿ ~~ ] - N"1S .,.., N -"'- "'.... <A <A <A <A <A <A ...... ~ ~ . ,; .. ] '1 N ~ ~ i o¡ ~ .. c c . "0 B B 5 I ~ §1 · &§ '" .- ~ j § oë;i .!! 00 - ë ~ . ;::I . ;::I ..¿ 8r-: 00 c.. !. s r-- 0 ~8. N'<: '" ",r-- fi ¡a r j S ¡ · e ~~ ¡.¡ 1 , ~ 'I ~ ~ 0 ¡oJ II) 'Z '6 .. 1 QO ... j § 1 · < c ·s ;¡; 'I f. i -(.) c: 0 1 , · . ~z .<: - · :;; - ...... .~ .!I :fi !. N ¡.. c 8 ... ~ - ~~o 80 .,.., c · 1 - II) \C) ... ~ ] ~ "~- 0 .E 00 <A B ... .~ · 1 0 :; ¡.. N...... o 6 ~ & .~ ! · . (.) - · · (' .c:« <A:5! <A ~ r ,. , 01 , 0 ...... · 1 v (.)..J¡" t:: , §~<A .,.., · :¡ L1 :õ ...=-z 0'<: 8 <A i e I ~ ~ .,..,~ _ CI) 0 ! t :.~ ¡oJ V"¡'c;;o 0 · J .;::1 · ;o:<~ - 0 .,.., N...'" - · ] · <A .<: <A <A "0 <A <A .it .§ ,¡ ~ (.)C:..J I 1 H ~=- ";¡ 1 Ji ¡ J! ~ 'c · · â .. s 1 o~ i , · c 1 · .. 0 t t ";¡ ... ~ · · ] 1 § 'Ii i II) i .. S ~ ~ I !! Õ · ¡ ] · II · 1 J! ¡.. < u ., 1 ü · 3! < c: ... ; .. g c CI) ~ ~ f ~ ~ c 1 1 'i .2 '6 .~ · .~ K r - 0 .~ ?> ~ ;::I .... ... ~ i i ... j ~ ] .':: ~ i .~ · e :g - e t .. · .- .~ .1 t :¡ ! (.) ..... · 1 · ... E ¡¡.. 1 ~ ! · s ~ f "õ "0 ~ t 50 · e L 1 ;j 1 1 .- .. .~ · .. !11J~ ~ ~ ti J 1 ~ of · @ ·c 1 !. ~ · õ. l ;::I .; .. · =- .. ... ... ~ (.) 0..1:1- .2 .§ ~ 1 0 1 ~ .~ .§ .., .§ ~ e<: (.)0... - II ] 0 c¡¡ '3(.)æ r:! 11 ¡ of · ] .. j :¡ l · j (.) .- ~ .. - . l - c¡¡ .. 1 !. .~ ~ .-:Æ _ 'ë .§ ~ ì '5 c.. o¡ .. 'ë , 1 5 1 ~ ~ $ ! ~ OJ 0 0 · " i ~ ë;j (.) (.) i - L I "0 J i 'E jJ :Æ '1 · .~ · >- < .. ~ J .. ? f' j(i ~ F "] ~ )tJ~t(7 ~ The City of Chula Vista is presently supporting all of its current programs related to I /J recycling through frcillchise fees which are passed on as user fees, county grants and redevelopment funds. Similar mechanisms which utilize existing rate structures to the ij extent possible will be implemented by the city to support programs for the short-term l through 1995. The city does not intend to build and operate its own recycling equipment and facilities but expects the private sector to provide equipment and facilities through I a competitive bid or free market process, Several regional issues, such as the county's plans for building transfer stations in the I South County and providing ce~tra1 regionally-based facilities, preclude a complete analysis of all the funding alternatives available to the City. The participation of several 1 cities within a subregional area and the unincorporated county under a joint powers agreement (JPA) is one of these regional issues that could be considered. The feasibility analysis for any capital facilities will require an ,economic evaluation and assessment of the funding mechanisms dependent upon the structure of the JPA. , 10.0 INTEGRATION COMPONENT The development and selection of alternatives for a source reduction and recycling program were based on an evaluation of existing practices and conditions, and the 'I projected growth and needs of the city. Chula Vista's goal is tohave an integrated solid 1 " , waste management system capable of meeting both state-mandated reduction goals and the needs of its citizens in the most environmentally sound, efficient, and cost effective , manner. , , I, " This section presents the results of the evaluations conducted for the SRRE, summarizes ..; the technologies and prograJins selected, and presents the schedule for program implementation. Targeted programs are shown in Table ES-13. . - 1 ~ \ , , I i , 2209 .053.TC-COITII2lCll1.1LA VSTICII1.1LA VST.PI<L ES-30 '~ /I/L(] \' II .' ; , - __,__..__.__.'_"~__'_____ u...___._". _______ _ ~_ -------.-- - -- - -- - --- ~-=u 1-=rJ dill .. .. . .. ;Ii .] .. . ; ~ :! ~ H I f 11 j~ ~H If ~-=l JI ~ t 111 t 1,¡flIt P 1 1',,:¡ t '1 :1 'I ..,' þ .. 'j f Jr'J 'I f'l ~1 . , I "It! - .1 n j l~fJ I IJ I, 1J1jj iq [;.1 f f ",'I " f:¡ Jd ht . . . . . . =-J ~ I a I I f I f f, ! Itf f 0 f j f I J ..~ - - .Ji ~ I r [I 1 f J 1 ~~ f I ~ . ~¡~ f [ I . flq . '" .! ~ . 1. t j - f "'~ t""1 I - J !v8 ~ II U I t I [fl If I E r t ·f f if 1 E [] I ..~~ 0 ~jl ~ jli I Ilf If!~ I[! ~ ¡qc- [ I ·t' f 1 H ~ h jjl. J1 ~ ~ "! 'J1jl f'~ '),j.IJ'IBf 'I': i 11 h ~dJ11 11[11 .11 111111flllll~t šiJl'H liHiJ ' . IllPp J~!jJ1 1!jfJ!!JjJ!~IJJ11!lil!ji - . , --1..- ""u.d .E u1JJ J1" [f ".lj~! "1..,, l~~ ~ in .......... .. . . . ... .......... ... o. , ~ e , r!· Hr ~ J p. , I 'I i . ., ~ r ..~U~n)l ~ fh It ,.111 ill I I1-JhJ"~ ..j H~h L:i!iUd¡!!HhJ' ' . - m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ i H 1 i j ~ " ...;J ,..¡ II-iff I L ! \' -.-.- Ii Ii ~Ul! .. I, .. !' Ñ - ~ I .. .. - 0 ì .IJ·II I 11 !1i t . III h ! I 1 ~ ;. 1.! 1r~]H1IEl1 'Ii n [ I I ~ . """t Ilflt Hr 1 8 ~1h H ~ 1]1:1 [~ ~t II ulJ I 11"tIJ1\ 1t1U1 I J' ..1],14 1LH .. r hi I t I .ß' j' · : '. ~ >~"Ui~llpH11 1111.'¡ 11jiJ1 ...1~" ~" ,s"r" ...ulL !... ur . . . . . . . . . . .. . ~ !ß' I t 11 1 ¡ I 11 Hi .," ~H 11, ·1, I I 1~ j! 1 '(1 - I t 11 ~ 1 'd ii'~' I ~H roli ill {I: H 1 1 Þ ~-o ~ ~ 'I ~ t· :olf' $ I: . lti ~ ~"u . t ë a; · - '", "'z 8 :j 1 p rß' II ¡ · t 1 ..] 1¡¡iI111 ,..00 ~~ è ! 1 ,8 111 1 t Ii i . -1 ~ " "I II ¡tIt il\ iljl¡ljl i . P 'õ i¡ ,:. 1 1 1111~ ~. ! I 11 = It "'J,d! .. 1 III 1· \,J -¡-'- slL·rin ill! _ 111],!1)J '~I PI] l'IIIHf~~ un Hl!l! h"Uhli h~ .,1 r ;¡¡" "u _ ,... ~"" .. . .'. .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . ~ . .11 I .i " f.¡{Li I g HI ~ ìhlJLu ~ - . . . ..... . . i I I , ! 1 " u. ,.; .. ,.; Ii /L/~« , -~~..~-----_.- -.---- ~- ----- --~-~- --~-- --- - ------- I . - · .. J] III, ~ ~ g .. -JID ;Q . ¡ , j :{ I i I t 1 1 ., ~ IJJJ ~ J ~ t I · . , i 11t Ii. III~ ~ ~J] I t .hlPr I lJh1lt11 j ~p~j t J] ,L,:¡ .ß¡:!J "' . :1 ~ ~.-.¡. g , tJ] · . .... . .¡ · i 11 1 JJI 1" ! II f .( ~iï 'j h j J. t:~ -=ill ~t ~ 1~i 1111 r~ Et i "" i Í! , I ,I ¡ 'I ' ~i!;~ '" ." '" ] E. 5 1 i ~ . -1J ~5 è t ~r ! ~ ~ I ~ j £ 1 i "i ~ Mlû~ i"!i ~ ~1~1 t ; -lJ~l 1~1 rJ j j' 1 J -1 t j J.~ I ~~ M J it 1 t ~ ' )] JIB Ilì~ji ]fE~ iLL,,!'" !" z! --1 · ...... ....... ~=m , e =m I ~ I , , '¡ -=1 ::! - =n · ~ 1 -J] ~~J ! · - =rJ )!~t/6 ATTACHMENT B: HHWE INTRODUCTION - 'Ibis Household Hazmfous Waste J'Jement (HHWE) has been prepared to comply with California AB 939 requirements, ItHwEs of countywide ÎDte¡n!ed waste lIUI"qetnent p~s specify how each City or uniQC6.....,ated area (County) will af'dy collect, ncycJe, cRat and dispose of IIousehold hazæidous waste (HHW) Iencnted by .........olds ÎD that jurisdiction within Ibon-Ic:nn (I99J-I995) and medium-lc:nn (1996-2000) pIannin¡ periods. Claula Vista is offered panicipationin the Sari Die¡o Re¡ionaJ HOUJebold Hazardous Materials Pro¡nm (Pro¡ram) by the County of San Diego Waste Mana¡ement Department at direct no cost to the City. The Pro¡ram has existed Jince 1985 and is a joint effon between the County of San Diego and the City of San Die¡o, adnúnistered by the San Diego County Ðepanmentof Htalth Services (DHS). '!be p,~ includes HHw collection and education and public information. The County of San Diego offers Chula Vista participation in Ibis Pro¡ram because the City disposes of its solid waste at County JandfilJs and indirectly pays for pan of the Program through tipping fees, a portion of which pay for the County of San Diego's HHw program. Because the County ~veS money for the Pro¡ram from Claula Vista through the tipping fees, the County is rc:spull,$Ible for describing how it will af'ely concer, recycle, treat and dispose of household Aazardous waste (HHW) lenerated by households in Chula Vista, Therefore.· tile County's HHWE is auached as Appendix A to fulfilJ the çecific requirements of tile element for Chula Vista, and ~onaI iDlonnation IpIIci.fic to the City's IOI1s and objectives. abtina CDnditions, Po....Am alternatives and teJection, implemcnlatioa clledule, InOIÛtorin¡ and evaJlWioa, and Iundin¡ m described below. .. . . . Based on data from a recent waste com~tioa study (1990), alDClJ of 1,590,053 tons of residential waste is disposed each JeIr at JandtiI1s within tile county. or.this waste, ID-1111IIIIW'OI1IINHw 1 , .. ~'f~ " /1/ &/7 . . - - H ---~ ¡ t I 95,849 tons are from Chula Vista's raidentia:J wastestrcam. Acccm1in¡ to results or an , EPA study conducted in Marin County, California and New Orleans, ,.....;c;,.'II. ÇPI"D~mate1)' 0.4 pe¡ca.t or houJdIold (raidentia:J) MIte is 1IazanSous. Applyin¡ this pe:rœnta¡e to the City's raidentia:J was&esIream, Ili'i'I"dlftllt~l)' 6,360 lOlIS of HHW are . dúposed each year m San Die¡o County, 3B31Dns (6 ~~,t) of which are from Chula Vista's raidentia:J W&SIeSb'am. GOAU AND OBJECTIVES Consistent with the overall Procram loa]. Chula Vista'. loa] is 10 ",..~Cllt illepl disposa1 or HHW. To achieve this loa]. the City bas specified objectives for the respective , plannin¡ periods. ~HORT-TERM OBJECTIVES (1991-1995) The shon-term City-specific objectives include · utuize./advenise permanent facilities in San Die¡o County. , · Continue in·house and County-supplied educ:ation and public information pro¡rams. MmJUM-TERM OBJECTIVES (1996-2000) The medium-term City-specific objectives include . · Continue in-house and County-supplied educ:ation and public iDfonnation pi~nms. . . . . 2 ~11I~iDIIIWI . )1/tjr( . ~ . . EXIS'IDìG CONDmONS ...w....r"~te Techno]O&ics, a ~t coUectiOll center in Cbula Vista, offen a ~~ ..we Monday tbrou¡h Saturday for!nsidents who first CIbIlin a -cœtrol Dumber- (for trackin¡) from die DHS boCline~. TIley offer a pick-vp .mcc for IIandic:appecI nsidents. '!be facility makes arranaements to pick up tile BHW at tile lIandi....,yod iDdividuaJs' bomea ooce theybave CIb~ their -cœtroJ Dumber" from tile DHS Hotline Service. "'w'''r',i.ate TechnolO&ics is pamiued to operúe as a 0--1, lIDn¡e, and ctisposaJ (l'SD) facility. Chula Vista utilizes the education ~d public information terVices offered· by the Pro¡ram, as we1J as distributing infOJ1n&tionaJ flycn which have bcaI developed in-bouse (See "'ppendix B). In addition, ~dents are encoura¡ed to pI11icipate in any of the additional coUection events offered C()untywide through the Propam.Tab]e llbows a schedu]e of the Pro¡ram's coUec:tioneve:nts for fisca] year 199]-92. PROGRAM S~I~cnON In addition to using the two existing permanent facilitics, one of which is Jot.-t.... in the City of Chula Vista, the City plans to utilize most of the Pro¡ram components offered by the County. These include six future permanent facilities tbrou¡bDUt the county and education and public information services which are aJrady paid for by the City through " tipping fees paid at the County landfills. 'Ibe City will also continue to lI¡o.....it\&te information on proper disposa1 and '* of DOII-tœiC altematives whicb is developed in- 1Iouse. . . . . -.III\IIIIW\aMIIHWZ 3 . . . Fl·L/ I ' ~ '" ~~~ ~I ---- ---._--- - ----_._----~-------- . ) 'I l PROGRAM 1MPLEME!'\.7 AnON . Addi.tionaJ permanent collection facility implementation dates and locations will be ddennined by the County (lee Sec:tion 5.0, Appendix A). Education and public iDfonnation will continue to be administered bý tile County. . '. MONITORING AND EV ALUAnON NonilOrin¡ and evaluation will be conducted by tile County u dac:n'bed in Appendix A. . Chula Vista will be responsible ror an ennual City participation rate ill the Pro¡ram aœordin¡ to its percent of HHW determined to be disposed of We¡alJy ill county landfills. Table 2 shows an estimate of the tonna¡e of HHW disposed at landfills in the county by jurisdiction and the percellt of the toW tonna¡e of HHW disposed by each , jurisdiction. nJNDING Tbe Pro¡ram is paid for through tipping fees Chula Vista residents pay at solid waste . landfills in the Count)' of San Die¡o. . . - ., . " -'11111111WC1M1D1WE .. . . li:SO . ~' - . Case No. ð-$-fI, APPENDIX III CITY' DATA SHEET PLANNING DEPARTMENT L Çurrent Zonin2 on site: -,.~ c:rr1F ·rc-·rt¡¿-,"'da. t-J'''' Nonh . tùtÞO. South '..J\~ East ..." I Þ-. West .., I'" Does the project conform to the œrrent ,zonin¡' ~~ ~ ""r') -~ -.\, ~ nAC"~\"'~~ Q~\C~. ~S-~ ~~\fs\(. ~\ ~\.\ \0.+. U. General Plan land use designation on she: e S C ~II(;C!! -I.'W!- \. ~ Nonh 0«:1 South ~\f\,\ East West Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram' ...... \. ço.. -:so-. Ln..r.."Je. . Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an ma so designated' ~\~ - <:....r.~,..,.~~ Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes' ",\\""'- c:;..~ ,..,.'r-n....1Ø (If yes. describe the design techniques :being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of the route ). m. içhools If the proposed project is residential. p~ase complete the foUowin¡: Students VDits 0eDeraIiDI Qcuerated School CaDloitv EnrOllment J'mDoSed FICtDl'S J=rom Proiect ,...........Wy . . .30 Jlmior Hi¡h .29 IcDior Hip .10 IV. 1emIJks: Ñ r-'J\- o.~\t"~\ø" ~~~ ~&~ . Y? :f.nl.J (~A\/J ~,/ ,,1/.5/"1<1 Date . Dim:tor 0 Plannin or Re ve )£-/5/ WI'C:F~=a "'.IIØI.Ð) "".IÐD.Ð) '.1 ~"-".~--,----,---~--~-<~_._---~-~-------- ------.--.--..-. . Case No. IS-95-12 APPENDIX I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) Background I. Name of Proponent: City of Chula Vista Plannine: DeDartment 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 276 Fourth Avenue. Chula Vista. CA 91910 3. Date of Checklist: November I 5. 1994 4. Name of Proposal: Source Reduction and Recvcline: Element and Household Hazardous Waste · Element 5. Initial Study Number: IS-95-12 · · JL//~ (b,"'clù<) Page 1 · Potndally _ Potemally sp¡nua. Leu .... SplRc.aat UoI_ SlplRuat No I....tt Milipled I.patt I.patt I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan des¡gnation or 0 0 0 1m zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 0 1m policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., 0 0 0 1m - impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of 0 0 0 1m an established community (including a low- income or minority community)? Comments: The proposed policy is consistent with the City of Chula Vista's General Plan. n. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 1m population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 181 directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 1m housing? Comments: The proposed policy will not induce growth. IlL GEOPHYSICAL Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in 0 0 0 181 geologic substructures? b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or 0 0 0 1m overcovering of the soil? .. c) Change in topography or ground surface relief 0 0 0 1m features? d) The destruction, covering or modification of 0 0 0 1m any unique geologic or physical features? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, 0 0 0 1m either on or off the site? ) tj - 3} (b:\srre,chk) Page 2 -~- --~~---~,-_._-~-----,_.,-.- .------,' , -----_._--------------~--- ---~-~--~,-- ......daD)' .....- apmea.t '- .... . ....mea.t VoI_ &pilka.t No r."CI _'od "pod r.pllct 1) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach 0 0 0 181 sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay inlet or lake? . g) Exposure of people or property to geologic 0 0 0 181 hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? . Comments: The adoption of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Ele\Ilent will not cause any geophysical impacts. IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 181 or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related 0 0 0 181 hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration 0 0 0 181 , of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 181 water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction 0 0 0 181 of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? 1) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 181 through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of 0 0 0 181 groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? D. 0 0 181 i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood 0 0 0 181 waters? j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water 0 0 0 181 otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: The adoption of the above cited policies will not cause any specific impacts to water. J1-~{ (b:\Irre.cbk) Page 3 · P....tiaD)' ..."tially Spiliellat Leu dal. SipUiuII V..... liplficut N. "pllct MJd,lted .....el a..p"c:t V. Am QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 0 I!!I an existing or projected air q~lity violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 I!!I c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, 0 0 0 I!!I or cause any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d) Create objectionable odors? 0 0 0 I!!I e) Create a substantial increase it) stationary or 0 0 0 I!!I non-stationary sources of air emissions or the deterioration of ambient air quality? Comments: The project which is the adoption of policy will not impact air quality or transportation. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 I!!I b) Hazards to safety from desigo features (e.g., 0 0 0 I!!I sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 I!!I nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? 0 0 0 I!!I e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 0 I!!I f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 I!!I alternative transportation (e.g. 'bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic ìmpacts? 0 0 0 I!!I h) A "large project" under the Congestion 0 0 0 I!!I Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips gr 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips.) Comments: See comments under V above. VU. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. ",auld the proposal result in impacts to: " a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of" 0 0 0 I!!I concern or species that are candidates for listing? / )tj ~ 5~ (b:Wft.cbk) Page 4 - - ---------.----- --_.~_.,.._.._._,----_._-_.~~--_...~.- --- --_.- --------." -~._-------~~._--_.._~-------- Pot_tlally Pot"dally SiplrlC.Ut ......... . Iipint.Ull v..... Iip.lnU..1 No ...... Mitlpled ...." ..patl b) LocaIly designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? 0 0 0 181 c) LocaIly designated natural communities (e.g, 0 0 0 181 oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal 0 0 0 181 pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 181 , 1) Affect regional habitat preservation planning 0 0 0 181 efforts? Comments: The approval of policy will not create any environmental impacts. If the City is successful in its goal to attract Materials Recovery Facilities to the area and if it is proposed in an area of environmental sensitivity, then project specific impacts would need to be evaluated. VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 181 plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 181 inefficient manner? c) If the site is designated for mineral resource 0 0 0 181 protection, will this project impact this protection? Comments: There would be no impact from the adoption of the policy. IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 181 hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 181 response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 181 health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0 181 potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0 181 brush, grass, or trees? Comments: The adoption of policy will not create an impact. Site specific impacts of facilities such as transfer stations or materials recovery facilities will be evaluated at the time specific projects are pr<,>posed. P! -5/; (b:\Ine.chk) Page 5 .....dall)' PotntiaUy SlplDcul lMI ..... &pInCU! UoI_ Iip1ßu.1 N. 1...c:I MAdplM "pilei I...cl X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 0 I!!I b) Exposure of people to severe poise levels? 0 0 0 IBI Comments: See comments on 9 above. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would th~ proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 IBI b) Police protection? 0 0 0 IBI c) Schools? 0 0 0 IBI d) Maintenance of public facilities, including 0 0 0 IBI roads? e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 IBI Comments: Not applicable. XII. Thresholds. Will the proposal allversely impact the 0 0 0 IBI City's Threshold Standards? As described below, the proposed project is not subject to any of the seen Threshold StaDdards. . a) FireÆMS As the project is the adoption of policy, the threshold standards do not apply. Individual projects will receive analysis on a site specific basis. b) Police The Threshold StaDdards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority I calls ., within 7 minutes or less and Inaintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62. I 0% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2' calls of 7 minutes or less. . As the project is the adoption of policy, the threshold standards do not apply. Individual projects will receive analysis ion a site specific basis. )~/-š7 (b:'wm.cbk) Page 6 , ._-.-,--- ---_._.._----~-~-_.._-,~-~_._-~--_.__..- -~-- Pot_dally PotnUally Spinu.t Leu ."aD . Slplfiu.1 V.I_ Sipl6u.t N. . t...et Mitipted I.,.el _pIIet C) Traffic The Threshold Standards reqµire that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of 1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. As the project is the adoption of policy, the threshold standards do not apply. Individual projects will receive analysis on a site specific basis. d) ParkslRecreation The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/l,OOO population. The proposed project is not subject to the Threshold Standard for Parks. e) Drainage The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. As the project is the adoption of policy, the threshold standards do not apply. Individual projects will receive analysis on a site specific basis. 1) Sewer The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The Threshold Standards for sewerage do not apply to this project. As the project is the adoption of policy, the threshold standards do not apply. Individual projects will receive analysis on a site specific basis. g) Water The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project is not subject to the Threshold Standards for Water. As the project is the adoption of policy, the threshold standards do not apply. Individual projects will receive analysis on a site specific basis. )1'5;( (b:'wrn,ehk) Page 7 ....·1iaI11 hle.dally lipifita.t .... .... , Slpifieul v..... .... liiplfita.t N. blplC:1 Milipted blpllc:t 1.",cl XIß. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. . Would the proposal result in a need for lIew systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 181 b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 181 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 181 facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 181 e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 181 f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 181 Comments: No new or altered utilities or service systems are required for this project which is the adoption of policy. XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the 0 0 0 181 public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? b) Cause the destruction or modification of a 0 0 0 181 scenic route? c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 181 d) Create added light or glare sources that could 0 0 0 181 increase the level of sky glow in an area or cause this project to fail to comply with Section 19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 19? e) Reduce an additional amount of spill light? 0 0 0 181 Comments: As the project is the adoption of policy, there will be no aesthetic impacts. XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Will the proposal result in thq alteration of or 0 0 0 181 the destruction or a prehistoriç or historic archaeological site? b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or 0 0 0 181 aesthetic effects to' a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? )L!/5'7 (b,"'.""') Page 8 -~._._--_._~------.-_.._._-----~~_._._. '- -~--_._-_._.~._. Pete.tiall)' PotntWl)' &ip.lRe... .....tJa.. , Slpllie..e Vale" Iipllieul N. I.paee MidpeN l_pIIce I_pile. C) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a 0 0 0 181 physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural vaJues? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or 0 0 0 181 sacred uses within the potential impact area? e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan 0 0 0 181 EIR as an area of high potential for archeological resources? Comments: As the project is the adoption of policy, there will be no cultural or paleontological impacts. XVI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the 0 0 0 181 proposal result in the alteration of or the deslrUl:tion of paleontological resources? Comments: See above. XVII. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 181 regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 181 c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation 0 0 0 181 plans or programs? Comments: As the project is the adoption of policy, there will be no impacts to recreation. XVIII. MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declaration for mandatory findings of significance. If an EIR is needed, this section should be completed. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 181 the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self·sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods or Califomia history or prehistory? Comments: As the project is the adoption of policy, there are no site specific impacts. Therefore, the project does not have the potential to reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. Individual projects will be reviewed on a site specific basis to determine if there is a potential to substantiaJly reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. Ji/~tJ (b:IaTe_chk) Page 9 P...tially ....elltiall)' Siplßcut Leu dI... Spifiu.1 Vain_ _plfkul N. 1 "pael Mltipted ....C! I.pac! b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 181 short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, , environmental goals? Comments: The adoption of the proposed project has the potential to achieve both short-term and long-term environmental goals. Goals of the Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element which include: source reduction, recycling and composting programs all have the potential to achieve short- and long-term environmental goals. c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 181 individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Comments: The adoption of waste management policy will not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. Specific facilities that may be proposed in the future such as a transfer station will undergo site-specific environmental review. d) Does the project have environmental effect 0 0 0 181 which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ~ Comments: The adoption of policy will potentially have beneficial environmental effects on human beings as the waste stream is diverted at source, and household and commercial products are recycled. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. o Land Use and Planning o TransportationlCin:uIation o Public Services o Population and Housing o Biological Resources o Utilities and Service Systems o Geophysical o Energy and Mineral Resources o Aesthetics - o Water o Hazards o Cultural Resources o Air Quality o Noise o Recreation o Mandaloty Findings of Significance Jtj~ ~ / (b:\Irn.c:hk) Page to - ---- ---- ---______0______----,--.-- DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evalualion: I I fmd that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and I!II a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment. 0 there will not be a significant effecl in this case because the mitigation measures described on an anached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I fmd that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect OD the environment, and an 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. , I fmd that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment. but at least 0 one effect: 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a 'potentially significant impacts· or 'potentially significant unless mitigated.' An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it musl analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. t I III! /qij . Signature Date ~~l)~ , Environme aI Revie oordin tor City of Chula Visla (b:\srruhk) , /Ý/beJ-- (b:\lrTuhk) . Page 11 . ROUTING FORM DATE: October 31, 1994 2'0: Ken Larson, Build~ng & Housing Jobn Lippitt, Eng~neering (EIR only) Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only) Hal Rosenberg, Entineering (EIR only) .ager Daoust, "Bng neering (IS/3, EIR/2) Ricbard Rudolf, A$st City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR) 'Carol Gave, Fire Jlepertment Harty Scbmidt, Parks & Recreation Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt. Zoll) Community Develop¡þent, Redev. Economic Dev, only Current Pll1111ling . Duane Bazzel, Advance Pll1111ling Bob Sennett, city Landscape Arcbitect Bob Leiter, Plann~ng Director ·,Cbula vista Eleme~tary Scbool District, Kate Sburson ,Sweetwater Union #,S, District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR) Maureen Roeber, L~brary (Final EIR) LAFCO (IS/Draft E1R - If annexation is involved) Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only) Otber FROM: Barbara Reid Environmental Section SUBJECT : Application for Initial Study (IS- 95-12/FA--lli./DO N/A ) Cbeckprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR- _/FB- _/DO ) Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP ) Review of Environ~ental Review Record (FC- ERR--l Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DO- ) Tbe Project consists of: The project will transmit the SREE and HWWE adopted by the City for inclusion in the County-wide Inte9rated Waste Mangagement Plan. Location: City-wide Please review tbe document and forward to me any cOlllDlents you bave by Nov. 15. 1994 , Comments: fLo ~ --I'f· . . 'f- .... t· . 1./ ., -- .. {. ~ )1//;3 ;L . "__'_.M_'"_____...·__·_____,_··____~_____~_'___,,·___·______ - -,..----.----- .----.-........ -____..__~_~_.___,._,.._...___ --_.~-----_.~- MEMORANDUM January 18, 1995 File No. YS-6IO TO: Barbara Reid, Associate Planner ~ FROM: Roger L. Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: IS-95-I2, "Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE)" - Engineering Division Initial Study Review Comments In November 1994, the subject document was submitted to the Engineering Division for review and comment. The Engineering Division had the following comments: 1. The HHWE was not submitted. 2. Section 6.1, "Targeted Materials and Alternatives Evaluation" indicates that septic tank pumpings are not generated in Chula Vista. However, there are still a number of residenceslbuildings in Chula Vista that use septic systems. With respect to Comment No.1, we have now received and reviewed the HHWE and have no comments on that document. In discussing Comment No. 2 with Michael Meacham, Conservation Coordinator, it is our understanding that the California Waste Management Board defines "generator" as the jurisdiction in which waste disposal occurs and not the source or origin of the waste, as our comment presumed. The City of Chula Vista has no septage disposal sites within its jurisdiction. All septage tank pumpings from Chula Vista are disposed of at Sewage Pump Station No. I, which is within the City of San Diego's jurisdiction. By the California Waste Management Board's definition, the City of San Diego is the septage generator. Therefore, the Engineering Division withdraws Comment No.2. KP Alkpa cc: . .Michael Meacham, Conservation Coordinator (M:\HOME\ENGINEERIADVPLANIYS-610.MEM] );J ~~r - ROUTING FORM DATE: October 31. 1994 TO: Ken Larson, Buildi~g , Housing John Lippitt, Engi~eering (EIR only) CliLL Swanson, Engi-neering (EIR only) Hal Rosenberg, Engîneering (EIR only) Roger Daoust, Engi~eering (IS/3, EIR/2) Richard RudolL, Asst city Attorney (DraLt Beg Dec , EIR) Carol Gove, Fire Department Harty Schmidt, Par~s , Recreation Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt, Zoll) Community Development, Redev, Economic Dev, only CUrrent Planning , Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning Bob Sennett, city ~andscape Architect Bob Leiter, Planni~g Director Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union Hi,S, District, Tom silva (IS' EIR) Haureen Roeber, LiÞrary (Final EIR) LAFCO (IS/DraLt EIR - IL annexation is involved) Hartin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route Lorm only) Other FROM: Barbara Reid Environmental Section SUBJECT: Application Lor In,itial Study (IS- 95-12/FA- 625/1>0 N/A ) Checkprint Dran EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/1>O ) Review oL a DraLtEIR (EIR- _/FB- _/DP ) Review oL Environmental Review Record (FC- EAA- -l Review of Draft Beg Dec (IS- /FA- /1>0- ) The Project consists oL: The project will transmit the SREE and HWWE adopted by the City for inclusion in the County-wide Integrated Waste Mangagement Plan. Location: City-wide Please review the document and Lorward to .. any comm~nts you have by Nov. 15. 1994 . . . ~b~- tuQt>ld. o...wv-e.c..l~ c.q~ct Comments: c€ MQ..'^~~¡:r" v.e..c=..c-t c..l L~L ~Cl..UCl1 ~r ~(~. b..Q l ~~~ ~_ ~Go'd. ~~& 4ÐtV\ I~ -;.-l".Q ~~ p/-IÞ ~c.oUA.~~ lI(7 . ~ tV( ___m.._____._.____.._. '______._.__, . ____."~~ ______..___.._ ___ _ ______ . -.-..-..-- - -- ----------.----.------ ------- .~...~ - ROUTING FORM DATE: October 31, 1994 , J'ð, ~.n Larson, Building , Housing Prow-\! John Lippitt, Engin.ering (EIR only) Clitt SWanson, Engineering (EIR only) Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only) Roger Daoust, Engineering (15/3, EIR/2) Richard Rudolt, Asst City Attorney (Dratt Neg Dec , EIR) Carol Gove, Fire Department Harty Schmidt, Parks , Recreation Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt, Zoll) Community Þevelopment, Redev, Economic Dev, only Current Planning Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect Bob Leiter, Planning Director Chula Vista Elementary School District, ~ate Shurson SWeetwater Union H.S, District, Tom Silva (IS , EIR) HaureenRoeber, Library (Final EIR) LAFC9 (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved) Hartin Hiller, Project Tracking Log (route torm only) other To~ ~ ...-Jt~ . Environmental Section SUBJECT: Application tor Initial Study (15- 95-12/FA-~/DO N/A I checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-____/FB-____/DO I Review ot a Draft EIR . (E1R-____IFB---'DP I Review ot Environmental Review Record (FC- EM- I Review ot Dratt Neg Dec (1S- /FA- IDO- I The Project consists ot: The project will transmit the SREE and HWWE adopted by the City for inclusion in the County-wide Integrated Waste Mangagement Plan, Location: City-wide . .. , Plea.e review the document and torward to .e any comment. you have by Nov. 15. 1994 . . Any new proposed recycling facilities would be reviewed through existing procedures, Comments: Ii'~t¡;; I , , I Case No. /S ~ CIs-12 nRE DEPARTMENT A, What is the distance 10 the nemst fire staûon' ~ whar is the Fire Dcpanmcnt'. Cllimatcd Jt.ICÛon time' Response to incidents city-wide is provided from all , fire stations and agencies 'providing automatic aid, Response to an incident : would be from the closest fire station, B, WW !he rue Depar:tmenl be able to provide an adequate level of fire ..,<lOCfion for the proposed facility without an Increa.se In equipment or penonnél' VP~ C. Remarks , C....~/~ r. 1~ November 7, 1994 Fire Marshal Dare . . , . , .~ )'I/b 7 WÇ:F'~O~nlU.IIIZI.f)/W.IOJDn) ..... .---....-^ - or '- . ./'}'V v ~, /-(7~/- . ~'Ñ\e~~ State of California california Environmental Protection Agency MEMORANDUM ':01 Michael Chiriatti Cat.. January 17, 15194 State Clearinghouse .- 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 515814 I . I'rClllu ~V~~· Lorraine Van Ke erix, anager W~oto Generation ~ hnalyøiø ~ranch Diversion, Planning I and Local Assistance Division CALIPORNXA IHTBQRATED WASTI KANAGEMBNT BOAJU) Subject. SCH# 94121025, PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ND) FOR THE SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT (SRRE) AND TIU;: ttOUS5!IOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT (HHWE) . FOR CHULA VISTA IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY Staff.haYe completed their review of tbe aubjeet document I doted November 15, 1994. Following the project description below. you will find staff/a comments on the document, JI:ROJIOT ÐUCRIF1'ION The City of Chula Vieta i. required to prepare an SRRB and IDnm to comply with the planning requirements of the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, and the planning guidelines of the California Integrated Waete Management Board, To meet theee requirements the SRRE proposes a series of waste management programs to divert 25 percent of solid waate from landfills by 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000, The HHWJ3 proposes a .eries of programs for the diversion of household hazardous waste from landfills. . CDNB1tAL C~·...:S .uh..aultD~ Bnvircmm-.nt.a1 It..vi.øw The SRRE and HHWE identify alternatives to be considereå, selected an~ implemented to achieve mandate~ waste diversion goala anå household hazardous waste management goals. , l'Dat.ltW brand fIX transmittal memo 76rI ,. ....-. /t//& i. -....-.......-...-.- ..- -- . .' '- ¥.' .~.;. . " ,",':. ., "," ... . , ou1& VJ..t& 1'... ::a . Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21065 defines a project as -cctivities qirectly und.rta~.n by any publi~ agency" and -activities involving the issuance. to a person of a lease I permit·, licénse, certificate I or other entitlement of use þy one or more pUblic ~senoi..", E~tabli8hm.nt of altern.tiv.. .u~h a8 t~e materials recovery facilitYI transfer facilitYI curbside recycling, and siting of constructional demolition recyclers will likely be øubjeet to sUbsequent oompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, SUbsequent environmental reviewCl may be required if the SRRE and/or HHWE propose8 to implement new programs or facilities I or to expand existing programs or facilities, Staff looks forward to reviewing future environmental documents associated with the SRRE and HHWE, The CIWMB does not regulate those wastes or materials which are considered to be hazardous. If the City conducts Household Ha,;ardou8 "culte (HEW) Collecticn cotivitiee, it sbould contaot the t>epartment of Toxic Substances Control for any permits required or other regulatory requirements needed for the colleo~ion .torage and diøpo.~l of hcøcrdouc wastes. For mor. information on HHW prograrns, contact Brenda Saldana of tbe Board's HHW Section at (916) 255-2345. ~tiaation Mon1toriftu ImD~em,ntation Schedule (~S) SUbsequent environmental documents prepared to implement SRRE and HHWE projects are expected tp identify mitigation measures which are to be implemented as a p~rt of the proposed project. Please be aware that whenever an environmental review document identifies mitigation measures, preparation Of an MMIS is required (Public Rellources Code I Section 21081.6), When an MMIS is rrepared ple.se be certain to forward a.oopy to etaff for the r review, Tha¡¡( you for the opportunity to comment on the Negative Declaration for the subject project, If you have questions please contact Claire Miller of my staff at (916) 255-2419,' . /t///p1 - TOTAL P,02 -.-.... .." " ~"". .. .' _.-. " ...---------.- -----.-- -.._-,----_.~.- .--- -.----.-- --.-"----- .-- -'-".-...'.-- .....--- ' ..... - -'-"--' ...~-_.- , ATTACHMENT C c.r» COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT /f Item Meeting Date 12/15/92 TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of AB939 Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HRWE) /. Resolution No. /¿.'1':J...? Approving the SRRE and HHWE and Authorizing that Both Documents (As Amended) be Forwarded to the County of San Diego for Inclusion in the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan SUBMITTED BY: Principal Man¡agement Assistant snydeb~// conservationCoordinato~ REVIEWED BY: City Managerrfì (4/Sths Vote: Yes_ No..,L.) v BACKGROUND: The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 19B9 (AB939) required that all cities and counties prepare formal plans aimed at wastestream diversion goals' of 25% by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. SpecificallYI cities are required to adopt two "elements/" one addressing source reduction I recycling and composting programs (SRRE) I and the other addressing the elimination of illegal disposal of household toxiJns (HHWE). Once adopted I the city "elements" are to be forwarded to the County for inclusion in a Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP). Failure to comply with the preparation of a plan and achievement of the wastestream reduction goals may leave a jurisdiction subject to State-imposed fines of up to $10/000 per day, The law required that two public hearings be held prior to adoption of both documents, The first public hearing requirement was met when the preliminary documents were accepted at the City Council's regular meetings of 11/19/91 (SRRE) and 12/17/91 (HHWE) , At that time I staff was directed to accept public comment during the designated period I address C'EQA requirements I and return to Council for adoption of the final set of documents when appropriate, This public hearing completes the second requirement and allows Council to consider adoption of the plans to be forwarded to the County for inclusion along with 1B other jurisdictions in the Countywide plan. The original documents total more than 200 pages and I therefore I are not being included in this report but are available in the City Manager's office upon request, For Council/s convenience I Executive Summaries of thE!! original documents are included in Attachments A and B. Attachment C includes items received subsequent to Council's 1991 action and constitutes recommended amendments to the original documents now being considered for adoption. . -/.f t /1/?!J "- -------_._-~.._.~-_..._.._-~~-+_._. --,..-..-.--.----.... -..--. , , /~ Page 2, Item Meeting Date 12/15/92 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving the SRRE and HHWE (original and amendrnents)I subject to changes required by subsequent legislation and updated information I and authorizing both documents be forwarded to the County of San Diego for inclusion in the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Resource Conservation Commission will review and discuss this report at its 12/14/92 meeting. A verbal report of the Commission/s comments and actions will be presented at the public hearing. Minutes can be forwarded to the Council when available if so requested. As was the practice with the draft documents, copies of the report have also been provided for information to the Growth Management Oversight Committee and the Chula Vista 21 Subcommittee. DISCUSSION: As noted during the previous public hearings I the planning process for meeting the goals set by AB939 is volatile and dynamic I although the goals (and penalties) are fixed. Since the law was passed in 1989, the SRRE and HHWE documents as originally envisioned by AB939 have been continually affected by legislative changes and interpretation I economic conditions I public input and program needs. The remainder of this report will describe the significant changes that have taken place since this issue was last visited by the Council, as well as the documents being recommended for adoption at this time, Sianificant Events Since December 1991 Staff has received public and agency input I conducted CEQA evaluation of the documents I and moved forward on individual program components in the past year. Additionally, there has been legislative activity which has affected the AB939 planning process as well as local mandates which have influenced the City's program planning. PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS The general public was given opportunities at three public hearings to provide comments on the City of Chula Vista's SRRE and HHWE. Staff was also available to accept oral and written comments through January 24, 1992 as authorized by Council, No substantive comments were received from citizens of Chula Vista regarding these specific documents. Comments received from the general public at a regional (SANDAG) public hearing on 1/24/92 did not impact or pertain to Chula Vista's plans. , ~~ ) ¿l 7 / ' /..:;./ - - Page 3, Item /5 Meeting Date 12/15/92 The SRRE and HHWE were distributed to adjoining jurisdictions for comments on how Chula Vista/s plans were seen to impact other cities I if at all, Comments!received from the cities of San Diego, National City and Imperial Beach indicated no concern and reiterated the need for citles to continue to approach the waste reduction and household haza.rdous waste problems wi thin a regional context. Finally, comments were received from the staff of the State agency I the California Integrated! Waste Management Board (CIWMB) as required by AB939. Those cOInIllents are included .in Attachment C which amends the original documents. The comments are provided for an individual jurisdiction to act upon in adoption of the Countywide Integrated Waste!Management Plan which is not required for San Diego County until 1994 (or later I depending on the promulgation of State regulations.) Briefly, the CIWMB staff had no comments on the HHWE and recommended adoption lias is. II Regarding the SRRE, CIWMB staff concluded that the programs and schedules within the draft documents adequately fulfilled the requirements of AB939 and the CIWMB/s regulations and guidelines for preparing the document. The majority of the comments related to the waste generation and composition component of the SRRE which was prepared on a regional basis by the County since the disposal system is maintained regionally, The use of historical waste generation data and the choice of sampling methodo19gy was of concern to the CIWMB staff. It was recommended that the waste composition and quantity data be revised in the Countywide pl~n to comply with State standards. The County is presently conducting a solid waste generation study for all cities within the County and it is planned that the results will be able to address this concern, The remaining comments by the State staff were minor in nature and are addressed in the addendum to the draft SRRE also included in Attachment C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The City's Environmental Rev~ew Coordinator has determined that the SRRE and HHWE are categorically exempt under class 6, section 15306 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines since the proposed project will· not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource, When the SRRE and HHWE are adopted by Council, City'staff will file the appropriate Notice of Exemption as procedurally required, ~ )¥'/7J2- -._.__.__.,--_.._---~. ........ -..--.----..------- --_._~---_.._- .~_.._._--- Page 4, Item /5 Meeting Date 12/15/92 LEGISLATIVE CHANGES During the past year there have been two significant Assembly bills enacted which have affected the AB939 planning process as originally established. AB2494 changes the formula of the wastestream reduction from diversion-based to disposal-based. This amendment was favorable to all cities in San Diego County where the disposal system is operated countywide. Ultimately it lessens the financial and administrative burden originally placed on cities to document the amount of source reduction and diversion taking place before the intended wastestream reaches the possible point of disposal. Instead, emphasis will be placed on measuring the amount of material entering the landfill system, documenting jurisdiction of origin, and monitoring expected reductions for goal attainment. What this change means to the SRRE as a planning document is that future guidelines and regulations will need to be promulgated in order to implement this shift. Adoption of the SRRE at this time needs to leave flexibility for such changes. Another legislative change was the enactment of AB2292 which recognized that the CIWMB/s implementing regulations for AB939 were not finalized, This Assembly bill sets a county's submittal date for the countywide plan at IB months following acceptance of the CIWMB regulations by the State's Office of Administrative Law. It does not I however I change the goal deadlines of 25% diversion by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. For San Diego County and the City of Chula Vista I this change means that review and adoption of the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP) will take place after the originally required date of January 1/1994. Finally, a critically important legislative mandate was imposed during the past year by the County of San Diego. The Mandatory Recycling Ordinance was adopted by the Board of Supervisors to ban (on a graduated timetable) receipt of certain recyclable materials at the County/s landfills. Cities using the landfills (directly or through designated haulers) are subject to load checks and fines if illegal materials are found entering I unless cities adopt and enforce local mandatory source separation ordinances. The County's Mandatory Ordinance is noted in the SRRE, however the City's adoption of a local ordinance took place in January 1992. PROGRAM ACTIVITY Council is aware that the City has continued to move forward on the , implementation of individual recycling programs which are important and needed to meet the 25% and 50% diversion goals I as well as the County and the City's mandatory source separation requirements. In the past year the City has also received two awards for outstanding 7=F#- JLI-?} · Page 5, Item /> Keeting Date 12/15/92 leadership as a governmental agency implementing recycling programs. Two new grants were received: 1) a Recycling Technical Assistance Program (TAP) grant from the County for $11/400 which is being used for outreach and technical assistance setting up recycling programs in businesses I offices I restaurants and the construction industry I and 2) a State grant of $25/050 for the RAD Project I focusing on housèhold hazardous waste and recycling education in the community arid school systems, The City is also emphasizing public education in enforcing the Mandatory Ordinance I an activity that has gained a lot of momentum in the past year. The groundwork is being laid for future programs in multi-family residential recycling by conducting a study of 60 local apartment complexes a.nd working with property owners to identify and resolve problems with multi-family recycling programs. And I of course I the City has ongoing and seasonal programs such as the single-family residential curbside program, Christmas tree recycling I and beach clean-up program. Conclusion The original documents of the SRRE and HHWE (provided here in Executive Summary form in Attachments A and B) outline programs currently underway or needed in order to meet goals. The proposed amendment to the original documents is reflected in Attachment C which contains letters and suggested page revisions which are germane to the original documents. Together they represent the up- to-date status of the City of Chula Vista's plans for source reduction I recycling I composting and household hazardous waste programs. It is timely to adopt both the SRRE and the HHWE as amended I subject to future legislative changes and updated information, Once adopted I the documents will be forwarded to the County of San Diego to be included in the Countywide plan which will then require approval by a majority of the cities with a majority of the population. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as a result of the recommended action to adopt the SRRE and HHWE. The fiscal impact of individual programs is and will continue to be addressed either in the annual budget cycle or midyear as the programs are brought forward. The ongoing administrative cost of planning I implementing and monitoring future programs is also addressed during the City's annual budget cycle. The fiscal impact of not moving forward on the SRRE is the possibility of State-imposed fines of up to $10/000 per day, Þ-I> 5 P/-7t! .__n__.______ , THIS PAGE BlANK / 7D~ /Lj~7~ RESOLUTION NO, J ¡, 9 J..? RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEME~T (SRRE) AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE EI:.EMENT (HHWE) AND AUTHORIZING THAT BOTH DOCUMEN~S (AS AMENDED) BE FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR INCLUSION IN THE COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN WHEREAS I the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB939) required that all cities and counties prepare formal plans aimed at wastestream diversion goals of 25% by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000; and WHEREAS I specifically I cities are required to adopt two "elements" I one addressir¡g source reduction I recycling and composting programs (SRRE) I and the other addressing the elimination of illegal disposal of household toxins (HHWE); and WHEREAS I the law required that two public hearings be held prior to adoption of both documents; and WHEREAS I the first public hearing requirement was met when the preliminary documepts were accepted at the city Council's regular meetings of 11/19/91 (SRRE) and 12/17/91 (HHWE); and WHEREAS I at that time, staff was directed to accept public comment during the designated period I address CEQA requirements, and return to Council for adoption of the final set of documents; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held on 12/15/92 which completes the second requirement and allows Council to consider adoption of the plans to be forwarded to the County for inclusion along with 18 other jurisdictions in the Countywide plan; and WHEREAS I the City 's Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the SRRE and HHWE are categorically exempt under Class 6, Section 15306 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines since the proposed project will not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource, NOW I THEREFORE I BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve and adopt the SRRE and HHWE and authorizing that both documents ( amended) e forwarded to the county of San Diego for incl n in t e Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan, pres..te. by aspt' stephanie Snyder I Principal Bruce M, Management Assistant Attorney P:\bomeIa_ISRRE ~ /' / / ì /. -I ~ '1 It/' , TIllS PAGE Bu.NK. , 0~ Jt-j-7? 7c------ . ~ ATTACHMENT C: continued SRRE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a summary of the Source Reduction on Recycling Element (SRRE) prepared for the City of Chula Vista by Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM) dated October 1991. The report is divided into the following ten sections: 1.0 Statement of Goals and Objectives 2.0 Initial Solid Waste Generation Study 3.0 Source Reduction Component 4.0 Recycling Component 5.0 Composting Component 6.0 Special Waste Component 7.0 Education and Public Information Component 8.0 Facility Capacity Component 9.0 Funding Component 10.0 Integration Component 1.0 STATEMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES This section provides a brief overview of the regulatory background that relates to the SRRE, as well as the goals and objectives of each component program that will help the City of Chula Vista meet the mandated 25 and 50 percent diversion required by State Assembly Bill 939 and comply with the county mandatory recycling ordinance. Refer to Table ES-I for a summary of component goals. The short-term objectives of Chula Vista's source reduction program are to educate the public about source reduction activities and to modify city procurement policies. The medium-term objective is to encourage source reduction behavior through the use of public information and business outreach programs, economic incentives and rate structure modifications, point-of-purchase signage, as well as the promotion of source reduction legislation. 2209.053- Tc.corrll2lCHlJl.A VST/CHIJl.A VST.PNL ES-l J /' -f} J'-/~?Ý -r ~_.-----~--~---_._-_._._~~-~----_._----- - Table ES-l CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUMMARY OF COMPONENT GOALS COMPONENT PROGRAM W ASTESTREAM REDUCTION Short-Term Medium-Term (1995) (2000) Source Reduction 1 2 Recycling Residential 6 11 Commercial/Industrial 10 15 Composting 8 21 Special Waste 0 1 TOTAL 25 50 , 2209 .053-TC.coITII2/CI!IJlA VST/CI!IJlA VST.PNL £$-2 , ...- /Lj- 7; 1~-sStJ 2::"_ . The city's short-term recycling objective is to divert 49 percent of the readily recyclable material that is currently being disposed, primarily through the implementation of mandatory recycling programs for ea¢h land use sector in compliance with the San Diego County mandatory recycling ordinance. The city's medium-term recycling objective is to capture 80 percent of the readily recyclable material that is currently being disposed. The city has also laid out some objectives for developing markets for recyclable material, including establishing a local waste ~xchange clearinghouse, attracting recycling firms to the south bay and promoting the, purchase of recycled materials by the public and private sectors. The city's short-term composting objective is to remove at least 30 percent of the industrial, commercial and residential yard and wood waste stream. The medium-term composting objective is to remove at least 79 percent of the industrial, commercial and residential yard and wood waste stream. The city will also provide market development assistance for compost and mulch and will use these products in city parks and open space areas. The objective of Chula Vista's spe¢ial waste program are to comply with the county mandatory recycling ordinance, ensure proper handling and disposal (including adequate disposal capacity), and where feasiple minimize, reuse and recycle all special wastes generated within the jurisdiction. More specifically, the short-term objectives include continuing the recycling of asphalt and composting of sewage sludge, continued sponsoring of citywide garage salesl and community cleanups, and encouraging the use of retreaded tires. 2.0 INITIAL SOLID WASTE GENERATION STUDY The Solid Waste Generation Study is divided into three subsections and includes descriptive information about the City of Chula Vista, current solid waste practices, current and projected solid waste quantities, and disposal stream composition data. 2209.053-TC-COIT/I2/C'HIJV. VSTIC'HIJV. VST.PIIL ES-3 ~/~r; :»/ )l/~ y() --_.,.,~.._-_..._._-----"----_.~----,-------~---_._- --_..,..__.._------~.~-_.._~,-_.,._---_.._--~-_._-_._-.....-- , The City of Chula Vista contracts with Laidlaw Waste Systems to provide solid waste collection and disposal services for all residential, commercial, industrial and other waste generators within the city limits. The waste material is hauled to the Otay Landfill located in southwestern San Diego County, east of Interstate 805 and nonh of Otay Valley Road. The landfill is. owned by San Diego County and operated by Herwg Contracting Corporation. , Diversion practices in 1990 in the City of Chula Vista included all material that is picked up by the residential curbside program, taken to drop-off and buy-back centers, donated to nonprofit organizations for recycling or reuse, and salvaged by scrap dealers. The estimated diversion through recycling activities is approximately 2442.6 tons per year for a total recycling rate of 1. 3 percent. In addition, Chula Vista's residential curbside recycling program, which began in 1991, diverted an average of 274 tons of recyc1ables per month between February and June, 1991. Although there are no composting facilities within the jurisdiction, the city's sewage sludge is being composted on Fiesta Island, diverting 11,315 tons of material away from disposal. In 1990, source reduction, recycling, and composting activities provided the City of Chula Vista with a diversion rate of approximately 7.2 percent. The detennination of a per capita solid waste generation rate provides a numerical value which can be applied to population increases to project future solid waste quantities. The City of Chula Vista has a base year waste disposal of 7.3 pounds per capita per day. Waste disposal projections (without increasing diversion rates) for the short- and medium-term planning periods are provided in Table ES-2. Quantitative field analysis methodology was used to characterize the waste categories and waste types generated by the City of Chula Vista. The results of the waste sampling are provided in Table ES-3. 2209.OS3·Tc.corr/12JCHUl.A V51"/CHUl.A VST.PNL ES-4 , JI-y / /5 /~ Table ES-2 CITY OF CHULA VISTA POPULATION AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL PROJECTIONS WASTE QUANTITY YEAR P9PULA TION! (TONS/YEAR) 1990 135,163 . 180,071 1991 137,863 183,668 1992 140,563 187,265 1993 143,263 190,862 1994 145,963 194,459 1995 148,663 198,056 1996 150,691 200,758 1997 152,719 203,460 1998 154,747 206,162 1999 156,775 208,863 2000 158,803 211,565 2001 160,211 213,441 2002 161,619 215,317 2003 163,027 217,193 2004 164,435 219,069 2005 165,843 220,944 2006 167,253 222,822 I The San Diego Association ~f Governments Series 7 forecasts for 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2006 were revised ~ifically for preparation of the San Diego County Source Reduction and RecyCling Elements. This revision incorporates 1990 census figures, series 7 gro\\-ith rates and current trends in housing completions. 2209 .053- TC-COTTlI2ICHUlA VST/CHUlA VST.PNL ES-5 , )¥/YJ- ø,~ ---- --- ---- ------- ..- -.--....-.-...-.-.-...---..---.- -_...._---..-.._-_..-_.._~-----_.------_._~_.__..- --------". . Table ES-J CITY OF CBULA VISTA SOLID WASTE COMPOSITION SUMMARY Percent Waste San Marcos Sycamore Otay Miramar Total (..) Component Cardboard 0.0 . 0.0 12006.3 10.2 12016.5 6.7 Newspaper 0.0 0.0 8133.6 4.5 8138.1 4.5 , Mixed Paper 0.0 0.0 11585.1 9.2 11594.3 6.4 HB Ledger 0.0 0.0 2578.6 1.4 2580.1 1.4 Glass 0.0 0.0 4748.2 4.3 4752.5 2.6 Film Plastic 0.0 0.0 3565.4 2.6 3568.0 2.0 Hard Plastic 0.0 0.0 4357.7 2.9 4360.6 2.4 Diapers 0.0 0.0 3809.4 0.0 3809 .4 2.1 Other Misc.· 0.0 0.0 58744.2 29.0 58773.1 32.7 , Tin Cans 0.0 0.0 2175.1 0.0 2175.1 1.2 AJuminum Cans 0.0 0.0 401.3 0.5 401.8 0.2 Yard Waste 0.9 117.7 31162.2 18.1 31298.1 17.4 Wood Waste 0.7 26.9 17418.2 11.3 17456.3 9.7 Concrete 0.6 25.0 1133.4 33.9 1192.4 0.7 Asphalt 0.1 2.9 59.8 2.1 64.8 0.0 Dirt/Rock/Sand 0.9 129.0 3113.4 73.4 3315.9 I.8 , Roofing 0.1 44.8 652.5 0.6 697.9 0.4 Drywall 0.2 22.1 457.6 1.2 481.0 0.3 Mixed 2.4 454.9 12478.0 90.6 13023.5 7.2 Construction Special Wastes 0.0 0.0 286.2 0.0 286.2 0.2 Total 6.0 823.4 178866.2 295.9 179991.4 100.0 . "Other Misc." category is equivalent to "Don-ferrous·, "natural" and "synthetic textiles" t , ·organics", "residuals", ·putrescibles", "saJvage!composite" and "inert materials· categories. 2209 .053- TC-eoIT 112/CHUlA VST/CHUlA VST.PNL ES-6 Fl'rJ . JS #-( . - - 3.0 SOURCE REDUCTION COMPONENT Source reduction programs typically focus on: · reducing use of non-relcyclable materials · replacing disposable With reusable materials · reducing packaging · reducing amount of yard waste generated · purchasing repairable products and recycled products · increasing the efficiency of the use of materials Source reduction program alternatives were evaluated according to the following criteria: · Effectiveness in reduction of waste · Hazards created · Ability to accommodate change · Consequences on the waste (i.e. shifts) · Whether can be implemented in short- and medium-term planning periods. · Need for expanding/building facilities · Consistency with local conditions · Institutional barriers to implementation · Estimate of costs · AvailabiJity of end u~s of diverted materials The progråm and implementation schedule in Table ES-4 is recommended for the City of Chula Vista. 2209.05~- TC.coTTlI2JCHUu. VST/CHUu. VST.PNL ES-7 )tj -g-q . .;~ -------,--- ---- , 4.0 RECYCLING COMPONENT 4.1 PRIORITY WASTE TYPES The general waste categories that will be targeted as part of Chula Vista' s recycling program are paper, plastic, glass, metal, construction debris, and yard waste. The targeted percentages for recovery for the short- and medium-term objectives are to , remove 49 percent of the materials identified for recycling by 1995 and 80 percent by the year 2000. 4.2 EXISTING CONDmONS The City of Chula Vista has had a citywide residential curbside collection program since February, 1991 (a pilot program started in 1989). Current participation rates are , approximately 82 percent of all the single family and multi-family households that receive curbside solid waste collection. Material recovery has averaged 274 tons per month. The city's internal office recycling program diverted over 17,000 pounds ofrecyclables between July and September, 1991. The city has a number of ongoing recycling programs for the various land use sectors in the city. Current city programs for the residential sector include annual citywide garage sales, quarterly community clean-ups in targeted neighborhoods, and an extensive public information campaign, a block captain program, and curbside collection of recyclables. Ongoing programs targeted for the commercial and industrial sector include the development of a business recycling data base, targeting of businesses for the development of office source reduction programs, (business recycling outreach program), and the recycling of asphalt and composting of yard waste from city operations. The I , Love a Clean San Diego group has developed an dissenùnated a school curriculum which addresses recycling, source reduction and composting. This group also offers a hot line service which anyone in the county may call with recycling questions. The city has been 2209 .053- TC-COITf12l~ VST/CHUU. VST.PNL ES-8 ......-' . )i/~ t}? ~ / . participating on a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of key county and city staffs (from allover the county) and solid waste consultants. The TAC was formed to address countywide solid waste issues and meets twice a month. 4.3 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Alternative recycling programs were evaluated according to the same criteria listed for source reduction alternatives. The alternatives and issues evaluated included: · Source separation · Residential curbside c0llection · Drop-off centers · Buy-back centers · Scheduled collection · Central processing facilities · Materials recovery facilities , - low technology - medium technology - high technolog~ · Marketing of recyclables Another approach at addressing the requirements of AB 939 is through the development , of a regional MRF, that would be I operated in conjunction with the Prison Industry Authority (pIA). The PIA proposesia 1000 ton per day waste recycle energy plant that would use inmate labor from the Donovan Correctional Facility. The goal of this program is multifaceted. The inmates would separate recyclable materials from the mixed municipal solid wastestream. The organic fraction of the wastestream, in turn, would be used to produce electricity and steam using biogas produced through anaerobic digestion. In segregating the recyclables from the remainder of the wastestream, the PIA proposed using a series of mechani¢al and handsorting operations that would allow for the separation of paper, glass, aluminum, plastic, ferrous metal, wood, and related 2209 .OS3-TC-COITIl2/CHULA VST/CHULA VST.PNL ES-9 J'!/~ 1 ç ~,., y~ -~-------"--~-'-"~--'--'---"--'-'--"-"' -"'-,"---' materials. The organic, or non-recyclable porrion of the solid waste stream, would be anaerobically digested, in conjunction with sewage generated by the prison. This process . would provide steam and electrical energy for the prison facilities, as welJ as the availability of electricity for sale to locaJ utility users. This project is only in the formative stages and the impact that the PIA program will have on the overall SRRE approach, in terms of scope and time of implementation, must still be identified. , 4.4 PROGRAM SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION The backbone of Chula Vista's short-term recycling program is the planned implementation of mandatory recycling for all land use sectors (single family residential, multi-family residential, industrial and commercial/public uses) according to the schedule established by the San Diego County mandatory recycling ordinance. The details for , each of these programs are still under evaluation by the city. Chula Vista will also establish a business recycling outreach program, a waste exchange program, and a backyard composting program. The city's in-house office recycling program will be expanded. The city's recycling program also includes the encouragement of recycling companies to locate their operations within the city and an extensive public information nd education campaign. A comprehensive listing of the various aspects of Chula Vista's recycling program and a schedule for implementation are provided in Tables ES-5 and ES-6. In addition, the County of San Diego is planning an extensive public information campaign in conjunction with implementation of the County Mandatory Recycling Ordinance. 4.5 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION The programs and implementation listed in Tables ES-5 and ES-6 are recommended for Chula Vista to achieve the mandated diversion goals. 2209 .053-TC..coIT/J 2/CHLJLA VST/CHlJ1.A VST.PNL ES-IO , /I(/~/ -- ¡It' 1../ , T.ble E5-4 CI~ OF CHULA VISTA SOURCE DUCTION COMPONENT SHOItT-TERM I~EMENTATION SCHEDULE Activity Completion Date 1. Infonnation and Public Education Continue civic center .ouree reduction/recycling program Ongoing Consumer public education program Ongoing Continue bus in.... rc<:ycling outJeach progmn Ongoing Implement point-of·purchue .ignage 2. City Leadershio Lobby for .tate legislation Ongoing Develop and implement city procurement ordinance June 1992 3. Rate Structure Modifications Evaluate variable can nlt program December 1993 Sponsor community cleanups and ci~ywidc garage sale Quarterly/annually .- Technical Assistance Apply for TAP Grant for waste exchange program and continuing business recycling outreAch and civic center recycling programs October 1991 Develop and implement city waste exchange program or establish cooperation with state program June 1992 Implement backyard composting program November 1991 6. Monitorine Establish business SOUTCC ReductionIRecycling database October 1991 Medium-Tenn activities \\IÎl1 be established based upon the result of the programs and activities conducted during the short-tenn period. ,/ 2209 ,053- TC.coIT/121CIIUI.A VSTICIIUI.A VST.FIIL ES-ll . Jt/~yy J~ It, ---- ' --.-- -_.~----~..._- ---.---.-.--.- Table ES-S CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECYCLING COMPONENT SHORT-TERM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Adivity Projeded Date 1. City Mandatory RecvClin2 Ordinance Ordinance drafted November 1991 Ordinance enacted March 1. 1992 2. Residential Rccvclinl! Pro2T'8ms Implement backyard composting pilot program November 1991 Continue block captain program Ongoing Continue to promote and expand sing1e family curbside collection of Ongoing recyclables Decision on type of RFP for collection/composling of yard waste November 1991 Issue RFP for residential yard waste collection March 1992 Residential yard waste contract award July 1992 Enforcement of yard waste collection program January 1993 Detcnninc approach to multi-family residential recycling program January 199: Multi-family recycling contract award (if appropriate) July 1992 Implement multi-family recycling program (enforce mandatory recycling) July 1, 1993 Continue to sponsor community cleanups Quarterly Continue to sponsor city'Nidc garage sales Annually Begin enforcement of mandatory single family recycling March 1992 2209 .OS3- Tc-eorr 112/CHULA VST/CHULA VST.PNL ES-12 /t/~r7 ~ ~ fable ES-S (ton't) CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECYCLING COMPONENT SHORT-TERM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Activity Projected Date 3. CommerciallOffice Recvclin. Pro....ms Apply fOT county TAP grant to continue city office recycling and October 1991 business outreach programs Continue to expand city office progrtm and business outreach Ongoing program Develop a =ycling data base Ongoing Determine approach to commercia1 recycling program January 1992 Commercial =ycling contract award (if appropriate) July 1992 Begin enforcement of mandatory commercial recycling July 1993 Begin enforcement of mandatory industrial =ycling October 1992 Establish 'W8.ste exchange program June 1992 4. Draft a recvclinli! desim ordinance fOf S'Dace allocation January 1992 2'209 .053· TC-COTT/12/CI!1.1U VSTICI!1.1U VST.PNL ES-13 , 12/" 9 () ,c, j.,j. 7,J1 -- I .----- -,---_.~._._._---_._.__..__... Table ~ - CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECYCLING COMPONENT MEDIUM-TERM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Adivity ProjedA!d Date , 1. Commercial/Office and Industrial RccvclinlZ Pro2Tll.ms Evaluate existing program effectiveness June 1995 Evaluate possible equipment/program chang.. July 1995 2. Residential Curbside Multi-Material Rccvclinl!: ProSl1"l.ms Evaluate existing program effectivencss May 1995 Evaluate possible program changes May 1995 3. Pilot Multi·Familv Rccvclim! Pro£':ram Evaluate multi· family recycling program effectiveness January 1996 Evaluate possible program changes January 1996 4. Materials Recoverv Facilitv Evaluate city's success in attracting MRFs to the area and evaluate May 1995 the need for additional facilities 5. Transfer Facilitv Consider cooperation with county transfer facilities (currently in the July 1995 planning process) 6. Education and Public Infonnaticn Assess effectiveness of information program Janua,)' 1995 Modify infonnationaJ materials in combination with prognmmatic Ongoing changes , 2209 .053- TC-eoIT /12/CH1.ß..Ä VST/CHt.JU, VST.PNL ES-14 . )1/- 9! JS,);" 4.5 MONITORING AND EVALUATION In order to assess the effectiveness of a residential recycling program, it is essential to gather and evaluate a variety of opeI1-tional data. The key items to be monitored are: · Set -out rates · Participation rates · Recovery quantities · Materials capture rate$ · Compliance with prOCFssing specifications (e.g. level of contamination, minimum quantities) · Vehicle performance and collection · Costs and revenues In the short -term, the commercial apd industrial recycling programs will be based on voluntary participation with guidance and direction from city staff. When mandatory recycling goes into effect, businesses may still be allowed to make their own recycling arrangements with permitted haulers. Therefore, in order to assess the effectiveness of a commercial/industrial recycling program, it is essential to work closely with the business community in establishing and measuring program effectiveness. The items that can be monitored include: · Material capture rates (number of trailer pulls and tonnage records) · Periodic commercial/industrial establishment surveys (e.g., in conjunction with business license renewals, as the city recently began to require) · Commercial waste stream audits 2209 .OS3-TC.coTTlI2lCl!lJlJ. VSTICI!IJlJ. VST.PNL £$-15 , ) 1-/ /~J- ~¿# :J ---. ---_._~._-~------_.._---- 5.0 COMPOSTING COMPONENT 5.1 EXISTING CONDmONS According the 1990 waste characterization study, approximately 27 percent of Chula Vista's disposal stream is composed of yard and wood wastes. The city does not have a comprehensive yard and wood waste composting program at the present time. The Chula Vista Public Works Department is mulching yard waste from city parks and public green open spaces. Some mulching also occurs at the Otay Landfill where Chula Vista's yard waste is disposed, but it is not known how much of Chula Vista's yard waste is being mulched. In addition, sewage sludge from Chula Vista is being composted on , Fiesta Island (see Section 6.0 of this Executive Summary). 5.2 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Composting alternatives were evaluated according to the criteria listed for source reduction alternatives. The alternatives evaluated included: , . Waste storage/col1ection - source separation/col1ection - commingled col1ection - mechanical separation - mixed solid waste composting . Feedstocks , - high carbon/low moisture - high nitrogen/high moisture 2209 .053-TC-COITfI2JCH\JLIo. VSTICH\JLIo. VST.PNL ES-16 , , ) tj /7 } " .., ,/ J->- r · Composting technologies - preprocessing - aerated static pile - in-vessel - windrow I static ,pile · Program scale - local - subregional - regional · Marketing and distribution - local - bulk sales to wholesalers - turnkey contract 5.3 PROGRAM SELECTION A~ IMPLEMENTATION The selection of a composting progr¡am has been based upon the objectives previously defined; consideration of existing conditions in Chula Vista; the requirements of the county mandatory recycling ordinance; and the need to maintain program flexibility. The composting programs and implementation schedules planned for the City of Chula Vista are presented in Tables ES-7 and £$-8. 5.4 MONITORING AND EVALUf.TION The monitoring of the composting program will be closely linked with the recycling program and parameters will be similar. 2209.OS3- TC.coTTf12/CHULA VST/CHULA VST.PNL ES-17 ) LJ·9i , r -,'-I~ /- -----.-.-----------.-......---- , 6.0 SPECIAL WASTE COMPONENT 6.1 TARGETED MATERIALS AND ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION Special wastes are materials that require special handling or disposal because of physical , , chemical, or biological characteristics. Most of this material cannot be diverted and will continue to be disposed in an environmentally sound manner (e.g_ asbestos, street sweepings, and infectious waste). Septic tank pumpings and incinerator ash are not generated in Chula Vista. Auto bodies and grease trap pumpings are already being diverted. Only those special waste types with feasible new diversion alternatives were evaluated. These include sewage sludge (existing diversion), white goods/bulky items, , construction/demolition debris, and used tires. 6.1.1 SEW AGE SLUDGE The San Diego County Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Facility (Metro) is responsible for treating and disposing of Chula Vista's sewage sludge. Digested sludge from the Metro facility is air dried at Fiesta Island in Mission Bay. The dried sludge is shipped to a private contractor, Corona Chino Farms. Chula Vista's sewage sludge generation is estimated at 11,315 tons per year, for which Chula Vista has taken existing diversion credit. 6.1.2 USED TIRES Used tires create a number of problems when buried in landfills. Alternatives available for used tire diversion include incineration, retreading, and crumb rubber uses. However, due to air quality problems, potential health hazards and the lack of end uses, none of these alternatives are currently considered viable for the diversion of significant quantities of tires away from landfill disposal. The city will reevaluate these alternatives at the medium-term planning stage. 2209 .053- TC-COIT/12ICHULA VSTICHULA VST.PNL £$-18 , )'i/7~ ,/ ~ 1& /../ - Table ES-7 - CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMPO$TING COMPONENT SHORT-TERM IMfLEMENTATlON SCHEDULE ACTIVITY I PROJECTED DATE 1. Continuous Composting of Sewage Sludge. Ongoing 2. Draft City Recycling/Composting Ordinance and November 1991 City Procurement Ordinance. 3. Backyard Composting Program a. Implement pilot program. November 1991 b. Expand program. 1992-1995 4. Residential Yard Waste C01lection/Composting Program a. RFP decision. November 1991 b. Issue request for pre)posals. November 1991 c. Begin public education. December 1991 d. Begin greens collection. January 1992 e. Enforce mandatory yard waste separation. January 1993 5. Commercial/Industrial Con¡posting a. Continue business oþtreach program. Ongoing b. Begin enforcement M mandatory industrial recycling/ composting. October 1992 c. Determine whether to issue an RFP for commercial recyclil1g/composting. November 1991 d. Issue RFP April 1992 e. Begin enforcement øf mandatory commercial recycling/composting. July 1993 6. Eastlake Composting Facility Pilot Program Ongoing 7. Compost Marketing a. Continue to use compost on city-owned parks, golf course $d landscaped areas. Ongoing b. Assist composting contractors in identifying end use Imarkets in Chula Vista and in pursing those markets. 1992-1994 2209 .OS3·TC-COTTlI2ICHU\.I> VST/CHU\.I> VST.PNL ES-19 .. /1/ /c; t )~J7 ---- .----....-------.- · Table ES-8 CHULA VISTA COMPOSTING COMPONENT MEDIUM-TERM IMPLEMENT A nON SCHEDULE ACTIVITY PROJECTED DATE , 1. Evaluate Effectiveness of Residential, Industrial January 1995 and Commercial Composting Programs 2. Modify Programs as Needed to Improve June 1995 Effectiveness, Including Public Information Materials/Methods 3. Expand Programs to Include Other Organic 1995-1999 Wastes (e.g., food waste) and Other End Uses (e.g., farm uses) 4. Continue to Expand End Use Markets for the 1995-1999 Compost 5. Require Large Scale Planned Developments in the 1995-1999 City to Provide Internal Yard Waste Collection/Composting and Use Own Compost 6. Consider Participation in Sub-Regional and Ongoing Regional Composting Programs 7. Continue Composting of Sewage Sludge Ongoing 2209.053- TC~IT/l21CHUl.A VST/CHUl.A. vST.PNL ES- 20 ~ pJ// / /5 dt' 6.1.3 WHITE GOODS/BULKY ITEMS White goods include items such as refrigerators, air conditions, washers, dryers and other bulky appliances. Under the County Mandatory Recycling Ordinance, these are targeted materia!s for recycling in the residential and commercia! sector. The City of Chula Vista will continue to sponsor annual citywide garage sales and quarterly community cleanups. The city will a!so include infonnation¡about options for the sale or donation of used items as part of its public education program. 6.1.4 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLmON DEBRIS The major options for this specia! waste category include the reuse and recycling of concrete, aspha!t, dirt, rock, sand, land clearing brush, and scrap metal. These materia!s are targeted for industria! recycling under the county mandatory recycling ordinance. The major methods of aspha!t recycling are cold or hot recycling. Concrete, sand, rock, dirt and metal recovered from construction and demolition activities can be reused as subgrade materia!. Land clearing brush can be mulched or composted. There will be I more economic incentives to take clean construction land demolition materia! to private recyclers as landfIll tipping fees inc~ease. 6.2 PROGRAM SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION The selection of a specia! waste pro~ram has been based upon the objectives defmed in Section 3.0 of this Executive Summary. The specia! waste program and schedule planned for Chula Vista are summarized in Table ES-9. 2209 .OS3- TC.coITI12/CH1JU\ VSTICH1JU\ VST.PNL ES-21 , ) f- ¿ fI At' ~ '1' ------...-----.-.--- --..- --~_..----" - 7.0 EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INFORMATION 7.1 EXISTING CONDmONS The City of Chula Vista has a multi-faceted education and public information program , that includes flyers, brochures, a recycling hot line, media releases and interviews, and public presentations. The city is beginning its business outreach and backyard composting programs with associated fliers and contacts through working with the local chamber of commerce and local garden clubs. The I Love a Clean San Diego organization also has ongoing public education and information programs. 7.2 SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES The best overall strategy is a comprehensive mix of techniques that includes: PubJic Education · Direct mailing of brochures and newsletters to city residents and businesses. , · Canvassing at stores and residences door-ta-door. · Targeted brochures to households whose first language is not English. · Public service announcements on local television and radio stations. · Community leader presentations at civic, neighborhood, church, social service and business organization meetings. , · Information booths at shopping malls and community events. · Recycling classes and field trips as part of school curriculum for grades one through 12. · Speaker's bureau of experts, public officials, and other informed persons that would be available to make presentations on recycling. 2209 .0S3- TC-COITI121CI<lJU VSTICHUu. VST.PNL ES-22 /¥ -91 . . ." Jt9 /- . Promotions and Events · Promote a recycling day or recycling week. · Sponsor recycling contests among schools, youth groups, civic groups or neighborhoods. · Recycling awards to individuals, neighborhoods, businesses and community organizations. · Encourage Christmas ¡tree recycling or use of live trees. · Hold specific materia] recycling drives and citywide garage sales. · Obtain celebrity spok~spersons. · Continue to offer a reduced recycling service fee to senior citizens and low income households. · Continue to fUn block captain program. Publicity and Reminders · Advertisements in newspapers, on billboards and buses, in grocery stores and community centers. · Canvassing at stores ¡md residences door-to-door. · Press releases and interviews for articles in local newspapers and magazines and local mews television broadcasts. · Posters, bumper stickers. · Caps, buttons, t-shirts. · Point-of-purchase signage. · Messages on shopping bags. · Notices on utility bills. · Telephone surveys. 2209 .OS3-TC-COTT/12/CH1.JL6,. VST/CHULA VST.PNL ES-23 . ¡Lj/)CtJ j~31 - --"-_...~---_._.---_..----- . ...__._..._.._--~~ ---_._-----~-- · Radio and television public service announcements shared among neighboring cities. · Participation in local TV and radio talk shows. 7.3 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION , Implementation of the public education/information program should begin within the first month of each recycling program phase or approach. It is recommended that the city initiate each program with an extensive four month education campaign in which newsletters and brochures are sent to explain the programs. It is also recommended that the city hold several public discussions in which residents come to voice their opinions about the programs. Tables ES-1O and ES-ll outline the proposed tasks and schedules for shoTt- and medium-term implementation of Chula Vista's education and public , information programs. 7.4 MONITORING AND EVALUATION Monitoring and evaluation of the public information program will be closely linked with monitoring of other program components and will particularly focus on: , · Public awareness · Participation rates · Material capture rates · Buyback center receipts and expenditures . 2209 .OS3- Tc.corTll2JCHULA VST/CHULA VST.PNL ES-24 , J1--/Il/ /./- -<>.~ . --.- -;.~ , TABLE ES-' CITY OF CHULA VISrA S~ Waste ClHlIponent Jmpllmenlation Schedule Activity Projected Date Short-Term Task 1. Enforce County Mandatory Recycling Ordinance (includes some special wastes) a. Single family residential Marcb 1992 b. Iodustrial October 1992 c. Muhi-family July 1993 residential/commercial 2. Continue private sector reporting Ongoing , requirements for special wastes 3. Continue to sponsor annual cityWide Ongoing garage sales and quarterly commµnity clean-ups 4. Iovestigate second use markets for used April 1992 tires, demolition waste, robber and grease trap pumpings as part of the city's business oulreach and wasle excbange program. 5. Continue to recycle aspbalt from city slreet demolition/maintenance Ongoing . 6. Encourage the siting of additional January 1994 constroclion demolition recyclers in the -- city. Medium-Term Task I. Evaluate special waste diversion January 1995 progress 2. Evaluate private sector reporting January 1995 methods 3. Consider a CCH:Om¡>Osting program January 1995 (yard waste and sewage sludge) 4. Evaluate business outreacb and waste January 1995 exchange programs 2209 .053- TC-COITfJ2fC~ VSTfCHUl.A VST.PNL ES-25 , Jtj/ )tJ/- ):5 5;: ___.~________.____.___... ____~ ___._.._____..______~_._ _ w__.__.______..__~__ ,--.---.---- - Table ES-I0 City or CbuIa Vista EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INFORMATION SHORT-TERM IMPLEMENT A TION SCHEDULE Activity Projected Date 1. Mandatory Recvclin2 Pro2ram-Soecific Activities Promote Backyard Composting November 1991 Follow-up Public Information and Worksbops December 1991 Promote Yard Waste Collection Program November 1992 Follow-up Public Information and Workshops February 1993 Promote Commercial Recycling Ongoing Promote Multi-Family Recycling May 1993 Follow-up Public Information and Workshops (Commercial and August 1993 Multi-Family) Promote Industrial Recycling Ongoing Follow-up Public Information and Workshops November 1992 2. General Public Education Newsletters and Direct Mailing Ongoing Public Service Announcements Ongoing Promote School Curriculum Changes Ongoing Community Speaking Engagements Ongoing Develop Non-English Materials and Announcements March 1992 2. Promotions and Events Continue Special Rates for Seniors and Low Income Households Ongoing Recycling Events Yearly Citywide Garage Sale August Christmas Tree Recycling Program January Competitions and Awards Yearly 3. General Publicilv and Reminders Develop and Conduct Community Survey 1992, 1994 News Releases Ongoing Radio, TV, Newspaper and Magazine Interview and Ads Ongoing 2209 .053- TC-COITIl2JCH1Jl..A VST/CH'UU. VST.FNL ES-26 , /1/ - /IJ;1 --7~/ ) ~l , Table ES-ll i City or Cbula Vista EDUCATION AND~PUllLlC INFORMATION COMPONENT MEDIUM-TE IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Activity Projected Date I. Public Education Evaluale and update material for public distribution Ongoing Medium-lenn program kick-off and existing program effectiveness updale August, 1995 2. Promotions and Events Evaluate and updale yearly promOlion events Yearly Target-group programs Ongoing 3. PublicilV and Reminders Recirculale community surveys 1996, 1998 Radio and lelevision public service announcements and features Ongoing EvaIuale staffing requirements May, 1995 2209.053- Tc-eoTTI12/CHU1..A VST/CHUl.Ä VST.PNL ES-27 /J(//IJ( > ~.JS- ---.- 8.0 FACILITY CAPACITY , The City of Chula Vista currently disposes of most of its municipal solid waste at the Otay Landfill, which can be divided into the Otay Landfill and the Otay Annex Landfill. The county of San Diego expects to submit a closure plan for these landfills during the latter part of 1991, although the actual closures of these landfills are not expected to occur during the SRRE planning period. The cities realize the importance of minimizing . the quantity of solid waste deposited in the county's landfills in order to extend the life of the facilities. Towards addressing the potential future usefulness of the existing landfills, the county is proposing to expand the San Marcos Landfill and the Ramona Landfill. 9.0 FUNDING COMPONENT This section covers typical component facility costs and program funding alternatives available to the city. The capital and annual operating costs associated with the various SRRE components are estimated in Table ES-12. Funds for future SRRE programs will come from any or a combination of the following sources: · Recycling surcharge at disposal facilities in the form of tipping fee increases · Establish residential recycling surcharge fees for collection · Commercial/industrial recycling service fees · Variable rate structure · Business license fees · County and state grants · Market development and materials revenue 2209 .053~Tc-corr/12lCH1.JU. VST/CHUI.A VST.PNl. ES-28 ---- , )L/-/!/~ J - JfÞ ~'t; ~ ~ ~ ¡ õ § ~ E-oo N ~8 ~8 .... ~ ..¿ :E:E . ~~ - N""!~ '" N -<">- ....» ~ ~ ~~~ ~- i i ,; .~ .. " 0 ~ ~ "¡;¡ "¡;¡ . E '" C c 5 · '0 B B I 0 E- - Õ ! u ~ ~§ i .... .- · z §~ § o- J! oo~ e .. ~ - :> E f 8r-: I 00 c:>. · « - :> ..¿ ~ r- ° ~&. g N..c: .... ....r- a ¡¡:¡ · S .. " .š c 0 e ¡ u ~~ 'i ~ · ¡.¡ ., ~ .~ ~ ¡,,:, . 2 0 ~oo 'iõ ,;.. i! Qo Z '" - ¡: g 15 · < c § É3 '" .;! .,u B i! · .. ·!!)¡,,:,z c:z: ..c: ~ ~ :;; - - .~ ... :;; 8- · ..... ;>~o E- c 8 ~ .., u ., 8 ° § · 1 .. - 00 t.> .., i! , 'S .. ~ .5Z- 0 .E 00 ~ ... 0'> =zE- N- - , c ~ 8- > .. ~ · '" U · « -=« ~:S! ~ B ~ I\, .~ , , 0 - u ~ ., U,..¡~ !: , §. ~ ' '" « C '3 " - ..c: ~ · e ê .&: ...¡:. ~ o ~ 8 i! · '6- .. = ~ ""!:> '" .- g , · j · E E- > u 0 >-:;: :;: - 0 '" N¡:'¡"" - ~ ] u ~..c: ~ ~ '0 ~ · .; · .~<~ · · U~,..¡ 'i oS .. ~ !:' .. i! i! .; ~ ... ¡":'¡:. 'C · c :¡¡ .~ ., o:¡; '- · .. · · c .. c i! .. · · 0 :ë ~- .2 E ,¡ · Co .. E u · ¡:. .., 0 · .. u - >! r ~ 0 õ. 00 ~ "" '" Q u 2 u Co :;: · 0 · >! · .. u · :ë ~ Õ · · 1!! · i! · E- < · .. 'g ü '" t.> .. · .. · .., < c:z: CÐ ... ~ u C ;; C ~ i! ~ 0 0 ~ ¡,,:, 0 c '2 .~ .. .. ~ '6 · · ~ .. u ~ -' - · .g ~ 0 E- ~ :> & ... ~ · i .., ~ g ~ oj 'ü · e ¡{j e II. ." ¡C õ .- ~ ] ~ · :ë · ~ i .- :.A · ... u 0 :¡¡ > U ...... · ~ æ- .. ~ .; E ¡¡. 1 ~ š ; c i- 0 · 0) ~ 'ü i! :;: '0 I::! ~ u e · 1 z .¡;; I 8- .!! .. · Ii · c ë e . ~ · J! 1 · ~ I- ~ of > !. 1'. · õ. ~ "'~ J .. .;, .. .. ! > ! · = 1;;:1 5 'j! :;; .., « .; ø.. ~ 1 ~ · :¡; U o II> ¡ ~ .., · .., · .9 UOæ 'J:! .. 15 0 ., :;: 0 <ü j3U ~ š .š · è · ] '" u ~ ¡ ~ ~ .. Ii .- ~ '" · · ., N U - <ü .., ë .. 8- c 5 '6.:E E '2 · >! 1 · 0 .., Ë 1:i oS ~ .. ~ ]I :5 i! Ë '0 ~ ..~ 'Ë ~ 'ë' ~ 5 8- · .. ¡¡ 8 .¡;; -:a uou 'j! .. · .. Ë .. « ~ '" :E ~ :! I · J! 'j! · ø:: >- ii 'õ · .. ~ ! 5 .., .. '" · f ~ ? :' ¡; .., :< :< . !J ~ N /r~/f);' . -,:S~/ -----..--.------ - ___d__ , The City of Chula Vista is presently supporting all of its current programs related to recycling through franchise fees which are passed on as user fees, county grants and redevelopment funds. Similar mechanisms which utilize existing rate structures to the extent possible will be implemented by the city to support programs for the short-term through 1995. The city does not intend to build and operate its own recycling equipment and facilities but expects the private sector to provide equipment and facilities through a competitive bid or free market process. Several regional issues, such as the county's plans for building transfer stations in the South County and providing central regionally-based facilities, preclude a complete analysis of all the funding alternatives available to the City. The participation of several cities within a subregional area and the unincorporated county under a joint powers agreement (JPA) is one of these regional issues that could be considered. The feasibility analysis for any capital facilities will require an economic evaluation and assessment of , the funding mechanisms dependent upon the structure of the JPA. 10.0 INTEGRATION COMPONENT The development and selection of alternatives for a source reduction and recycling program were based on an evaluation of existing practices and conditions, and the , projected growth and needs of the city. Chula Vista's goal is to have an integrated solid waste management system capable of meeting both state-mandated reduction goals and the needs of its citizens in the most environmentally sound, efficient, and cost effective manner. This section presents the results of the evaluations conducted for the SRRE, summarizes , the technologies and programs selected, and presents the schedule for program implementation. Targeted programs are shown in Table ES-13. 2109 .O¡)·TC-COITII21CHlJU\ VST/CHlJU\ VST.PNL ES-30 . JJ/~/¿¿? ff _q- . - ,¡d, - .. .. N ~ ~ 'i g ~ . . i .. .. ~ :! U d ill I'll H ]i ~ t if1î 1 îfH¡ 0 H " 1 1 .q:¡:f! I U ,;" I a · .IIi J lril II j!l ¡1 . U f~[it] . II j IHJ I fJ 111]~U :~ . q h. .E [ .E [¡...:¡ L" ~ ~ .. !. . ~ ~ & . ~ . JI:.': H~ ' . , . . . ~ I ~ ¡ If i HI I Ii I J I 0 ë I J I J " ¡¡;~ i I . ~ [ ~ ~. > t [ 'I [ f I~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~1! t r 1 -..,~ " .! '" '" .! :. i:; ~ 1 . ~5c OJ ¡ør I i =I[t t i '1 -- ! .. '; 1! g I ø 1 ë~"" :;; 1 H Ii f '. f 1 Ë ·r 'f Ell E [] ø <~z c 1 [.; r" · I . ~l 1 Iii filII Ifl~ f~{ ~ c " H :!: ¡IHI',111 ui ! !1Iq:r]HI .·d ',Ita 11~ ';]II1!al';8' ,;1: ¡ · tJ 11 t t ,J f.1 lilt! . il 111111f111~lil .t 1· ~1 ! ~ti]Jlfl¡f¡~1J]jlllil¡~i HHHiIHtl1 c·· ~. I ~f .Ib- I~~ - '1' ~ to',> !1u8 ~~_u"l_:u! ul..u l~~ .......... .. . . . .. -. .......... ... ~ r~·r IP I ¡¡ . I h t I ., .. Uh it 5·;!11~ ~ :I~lf=l1b ~ HuH!n ~ uzu~ntd!L!~ . . . . . . . . . ............... I q .r 1 ~! u ... ,. F? ~ / 0 'is ,~ rfi''' ~ f - _._----_._-_.-.._.__._"-,---_.._--~--_.~----~----_.._--,--"._--,- -.-"--.--. 'I¡!I .. .. N g i." .. ;J I .. ~ " 1 . I J ~ I a !:I 1·1 t 11U h ! 1 1 r. ~ U ! - d I I t~1 H t ¡!E] ¡ ni! ~ ,,[..~ ..qll( lÏ[ 1 8 rrt j1 I I f '¡;'1.J JI 1 )1.I["õ ¡Lit ¡rfJ ·1:in1hII1lHH I .0 ! fl1 J UU 'liIU [.; S .L I. ·t l' ~;" . . J 1 t'~11tHlpHll H]"~ .H~r.n :'5U ",1:0; 'Ii I", ,.!>U flsu!'u £~:¡~ c ~ !!ð1! [ , . . , . , . , , ... . ., ~ ~ f .~ 1'0 n :¡ J '1 ~ ! 0 :ï I :.. i [1 " '!> .~ '¡¡ Ii! :;¡ .. ~ .~ ~ ~ I ... t;~ f i ] ¡ 1 h- I :ï I! 1 "-~il ~, > e 1.1: , ~ .. ]1~·Jb I ~~~ r.f .1 ~ ~ -Ii tr ri ! i 1 11 "'-0 ., ~~ 1 ..8 t9 "~C ~ r- . 1.. i ~ ¡¡;,,(,J :¡ . . ;... i ë ~ ~ ~ ·u ..'"z <: 101 u .Ii i to t' ] t ~ tl : ipi j ..00 " rj I I' if e~ ~I I t :&] ~5 ~ ~ 1 ~g 1111 j 1 ~ f to :'IiI i!."II;:¡ .& ~ - ~. ·i :11"õ Ii u~ .~ .1 .. fl ìJl1 ¡11~!rlfif¡1 .. fI f l~ i l~IHq ~ . t1jllllp·1 ~ ! '1 It . fld· 1 ~l]] S ~J__I___ . S .~1h:;~1 II I~ I ~p.I~.pIHH f!h UIUItH~H uu [.~ !H~u H IuU U .. ~ If !' .. . .. .. . .. . . . . .. . . , , ~ H I " r. q 1 ~ iI .. ~1!1 -'J t ~ HHJLu ~ 111 ..;J.. , . . , ..... . . I J I j :ï ] ! 0 u u ..; .. ..; . )L-I~/tJ9 /5 ~/tí I ! , ~zf .. ~i~ c õi ~ i." .. ~ ¡ ;:¡ :f I . . t . ~ i 1 1 ~ · \ .1 l' i 8 . ¡ tft·HI I t [. hlhr I 1jhnl~l¡ f~lJi]j! ~!:o: [~d! ~ ! ~ ~ ....... , ~ . i 8 l~ 1 J¡ 111 t 11 J j ! j u ~.I ~H .. j~~ j 1. i J "'-0 ¡(,J~ ~ ~11 1111 II ~ i ....z C "Co " '!J'T·- Ii ~5 I t·S ~ M'I Hi! 1 ~ . '1 1 ~I .d!i M J'u ![I.t~ ri~ .·~h~ t hi! I, 1(1' Ii I'll ' _jjs. M.t >. Ifi1E~jllj1IJ' 11¡~ 1z.f~~ ~ ~ ~o z! , . . . . . .. ....... g ~ i ,. ~ ¡ '; ~ ~ . . I 1 j ·.-1 c ~ it . ... - /:¡~)/¡J '5- J l' I / l ! ~._...- "---"------~._.._. .---- --- - INTRODUCTION This Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) has been prepared to comply with California AB 939 requirements. HHWEs of countywide integrated waste management plans specify how each City or unincorporated area (County) will safely collect, recycle, treat and dispose of household hazardous waste (HHW) generated by households in that jurisdiction within short-term (1991-1995) and medium-term (1996-2000) planning periods. Chula Vista is offered participation in the San Diego Regional Household Hazardous Materials Program (Program) by the County of San Diego Waste Management Department at direct no cost to the City. The Program has existed since 1985 and is a joint effort between the County of San Diego and the City of San Diego, administered by the San Diego County Department of Health Services (DHS). The Program includes HHW collection and education and public information. The County of San Diego offers Chula Vista participation in this Program because the City disposes of its solid waste at County landfills and indirectly pays for pan of the Program through tipping fees, a portion of which pay for the County of San Diego's HHW program. Because the County receives money for the Program from Chula Vista through the tipping fees, the County is responsible for describing how it will safely collect, recycle, treat and dispose of household hazardous waste (HHW) generated by households in Chula Vista. Therefore, the County's HHWE is attached as Appendix A to fulfill the specific requirements of the element for Chula Vista, and additional information specific to the City's goals and objectives, existing conditions, program alternatives and selection, implementation schedule, monitoring and evaluation, and funding are described below. Based on data from a recent waste composition study (1990), a total of 1,590,053 tons of residential waste is disposed each year at landfills within the county. Of this waste, 22C5-1111111/W1C11V1111 1 )1/-//) '" 1';/ s..{ ') . 95,849 tons are from Chula Vista's residential wastestrearn. According to results of an EPA study conducted in Marin County, California and New Orl~s, Louisiana, approximately 0.4 percent of houselold (residential) waste is hazardous. Applying this percentage to the City's residential Wtitestrearn, approximately 6,360 tons of HHW are disposed each year in San Diego ~ty, 383 tons (6 percellt) of which are from Chula Vista's residential wastestrearn. GOALS AND OBJEC'l'IVE§ Consistent with the overall Program goal, Chula Vista's goal is to prevent illegaJ disposal of HHW. To achieve this goal, the City has specified objectives for the respective planning periods. SHORT-TERM OBJECTIVES (1~I-I995) The short-term City-specific objectives include · Utilize/advertise permanent facilities in San Diego County. · Continue in-house and Cqunty-supplied education and public information programs. MEDIUM-TERM OBJECTIVES (1~6-2000) The medium-term City-specific objcktives include · Continue in-house and County-supplied education and public information programs. ~IIJ\IIIIW\CHVIIIHW 2 ;1f--)I}- . . -- .~ r_ .' ..-.-- --_.---_._..__.._,._--_._..._-~.._----_._.__._._---,_.--~~".._-_. .-..-,-.--.--....-------.---- EXISTING CONDmONS Appropriate Technologies, a pennanent collection center in Chula Vista, offers a drop-off aervice Monday through Saturday for residents who first obtain a 'control number" (for tracking) ftom the DHS hot1ine aervice. They offer a pick-up aervice for handicapped residents. The facility makes arrangements to pick up the HHW at the handicapped individuals' homes once they have obtained their "control number" ftom the DHS Hotline Service. Apy.vy.iate Technologies is permitted to operate as a treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facility. Chula Vista utilizes the education and public infonnation services offered by the Program, as well as distributing infonnationa! flyers which have been developed in-house (See Appendix B). In addition, residents are encouraged to participate in any of the additional collection events offered countywide through the Program. Table 1 shows a schedule of the Program's collection events for fiscal year 1991-92. PROGRAM SELECTION In addition to using the two existing permanent facilities, one of which is located in the City of Chula Vista, the City plans to utilize most of the Program components offered by the County. These include six future permanent facilities throughout the county and education and public infonnation services which are already paid for by the City through tipping fees paid at the County landfills. The City will also continue to disseminate information on proper disposal and use of non-toxic alternatives which is developed in- house. ~1111HIIWICIIVIHIfW 3 )J/ / / /] .. /S-<jW . PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Additional permanent collcction t'a¢ility implementation dates and locations will be determined by the County (see Seiction S.O, Appendix A). Education and public infonnation will continue to be administered by the County. . MONITORING AND EVALUATION Monitoring and evaluation will be conducted by the County as described in Appendix A. Chula Vista will be responsible for an annual City participation rate in the Program according to its percent of HHW ¡determined to be disposed of illegally in county landfills. Table 2 shows an estimate of the tonnage of HHW disposed at landfills in the county by jurisdiction and the percent of the total tonnage of HHW disposed by each jurisdiction. FUNDING The Program is paid for through tipping fees Chula Vista residents pay at solid waste - landfills in the County of San Diego. :z2OIIo.lll\H11W\C11V111HW 4 /i/~ //f .. /.:> ~<5 ATTACHMENT D: Amendments to _ SRRE & HHWE December 15, 1992 County of San Diego Department of Public Works Solid Waste Division 5555 Overland Avenue, M.S. 0383 San Diego, CA 92123-1295 REI City of Chula Vista, SRRE and HHWE This will transmit the Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) adopted by the City of Chula Vista in compliance with AB939, The draft SRRE and HHWE, which were distributed to the County in December 1991 are hereby amended with the enclosed attachment comprised of the following material: 1) Letter from Camp Dresser & McKee Inc, re: State Staff Comments of the Preliminary Draft SRRE (June 23, 1992) 2) Letter from California Integrated Waste Management Board re: Board Comments on the SRRE and HHWE (June 2, 1992) 3) Ci ty of Chula Vista Memorandum rea Revisions to Potential Development Data (November 30, 1992) These documents I as amended I are being forwarded to the County at this time for inclusion in the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan subject to future legislative changes and updated information. , The City of Chula Vista will continue to actively work with the AB939 Technical Advisory Committee, CIWMB staff, and with surrounding jurisdictions to assure that the programs and facilities chosen for implementing the goals of AB939 meet the needs of the residents of Chula Vista and allow for regional cooperation. Sincerely I . John D, Goss City Manager , Ci tyof Chula Vista SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING RT.1lM1P.IfT HOUSEHOLD ØA&ARDOUS 1fASTE BLEKENT December 1992 , , Pd,nUd DO 1.cyclK 'aper /t////t , 5 ~7 , ~~.. "UlYa CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. environmental engineers. scIf1ntists. 430 North VIneyard Suite 310 planners. & management consultants Ontano. Califomla 91764 714986-681' , June 23, 1992 City Manager's Office 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Attn: Stephanie Popek Snyder , Principal Management Assistant Subject: State's Staff Comments of the Preliminary Draft Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) Dear Ms. Snyder: Camp Dresser &. McKee Inc. (CDM) has been meeting regularly with the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) staff and County of San Diego staff regarding CIWMB comments on the preliminary draft SRRE and HHWE for the , jurisdictions within San Diego County. CIWMB staff have no comments on the HHWEs for cities within San Diego County and this document may be adopted as written. Regarding the SRRE documents, CIWMB staff concluded that the programs and schedules within the preliminary draft documents adequately fulf1l1 the requirements of the California Integrated Waste Management Act (IWMA)and the CIWMB's regulations and guidelines for preparing the SRREs. The majority of CIWMB comments relate to the waste generation and composition portion of each SRRE since historical waste generation data information was used in preparing the preliminary draft SRREs. CIWMB staff recommended that the final SRRE documents be provided with revised waste composition and waste quantities which comply with the state's standards. The CIWMB commented that this revised waste characterization study be performed prior to adoption of the final document. The County of San Diego is now in the process of conducting a solid waste generation study for the cities within the county. This study is estimated to be completed in mid-summer 1992, after which, all SRRE documents will be , /1//// ~ . CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. Stephanie Popek Snyder City of Chula Vista Page 2 tentatively fu¡ali7ed for inclusion in the County Integrated Waste Management Plan {CIWMP}. The remaining comments for each çity's document were minor in nature and CIWMB staff 1eCOminends that an addendum be written to address these comments. The addendum includes city specific, CIWMB, an4 Task Force/Citizen comments, although, typographical and grammatical errors are not included. Each city within the County of San Diego should proceed forward with adoption of 'the document as a final draft, with the inclusion of the addendum. If adoption has alrea!!y occurred you may wish to submit this addendum as an infonnation item to your City ¢ouncil. As mentioned previously, all comments in the addendum will be included in the i consolidation of the SRRE documents for inclusion in the CIWMP. Your city will have! an opportunity to adopt the fmal plan at that time. , If there are any questions or comments, please contact either your team leader, Lewis Laine, or myself. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. ~. Robert A. Hawfield, r. Project Manager cc: Lewis Laine, CDM Reed Bennett, County of $an Diego, Solid Waste Division John Nuffer, California Integrated Waste Management Board Steve Sachs, San Diego Association of Governments Attachments: · Addendum · Annual Waste Generation Estimates for 1990, 1995, and 2000 - Under current c:onditions and after SRRE implementation · Table 8-3 - Revised Waste Disposal Capacity JL!-//? '"' { -- '-/1 ,~ -----~----------~~.- - _._---~----------~.._--------,.__._._-~._- CITY OF CHULA VISTA SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT ADDENDUM JUNE 23, 1992 This Addendum serves as a supplement, which will incorporate the changes and corrections, to the preliminary draft Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) for the City of Chula Vista, dated November, 1991, submitted by CDM. The program and implementation schedules, as outlined in the preliminary draft SRRE, meet the state's guidelines and requirements. The majority of the comments received from the State addressed the need for more accurate waste composition data for each jurisdiction. The County of San Diego is in the process of gathering this data, which will be incorporated into the Final SRRE. According to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (lWMA), each city is required to review and respond to comments made by the public regarding the proposed Source Reduction and Recycling Element and the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE). This document incorporates the waste quantities and waste composition data which includes the random survey data diversion quantities for commercial/industrial services for the base year of 1990. An updated waste characterization study is being performed by the county which addresses the comments from the CIWMB. In addition, comments from the Local Task Force, Citizens Advisory Committee, and Technical Advisory Committee are included. 1 )(-//6' . ,;> .::- tJ - · CALIFORNIA INTEGRA TED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD COMMENTS Initial SoUd Waste Generation Studv Waste quantities/composition will be revised after the waste characterization study is completed by the County of San Diego. These quantities will be incorporated into the County Integrated Waste Management Plan (CIWMP), which will be completed early 1993. The County of San Diego, Depart/nent of Public Works, Solid Waste Division has access to extensive regional data on waSte composition in San Diego County. A customized ScaleWare data system was installed' and now operates at each landfùl, except for the Borrego Landfill. This system automatically generates reports on quantities disposed by , truck type. This data, in conjunction with hauler surveys, makes it possible for each city in the county to estimate the specific characterization of it's wastestreaJn. The County of San Diego will refine the ScaleWare data system to provide weight records by jurisdiction and the projection of waste quantities and composition which will be based on a city by city analysis of weight records and revised waste characterization data. Waste Diverted Comment: Pages 2-13 (Diver$ion Practices): Please provide data from the recently completed diversion survey. Also, please report diverted material by weight, waste cateJory and waste type and by source of generation. , Response: The attached revised tables for 1990, 1995 and 2000 incorporate the random survey results of existing diversion quantities for commercial and industrial establishments. These tables do not reflect modified waste 2 /1-/ /7 .' 1-> Ý/ -~_.._-~--_...._,-- ~'-'--'---~------------"--"---"- - --,-------......_._---_._~_.- -------.-'-.-- -_..,.,'------_..~_.. quantity or waste composition data, which will be included in the final SRRE document after completion of the waste characterization study conducted by the County of San Diego. Cnmments on Other ComDonents of SRRE Comment: Please include in this component a solid waste facilities need pr~tion estimate which estimates the additional disposal capacity, in cubic yards per year, needed to accommodate anticipated solid waste generation within the city for a IS-year period... Response: Table 8-3 attached, reflects disposal capacity needs for the city in cubic yards per year, assuming successful implementation of SRRE goals. Comment: At some point in the planning process, the city should set limits, levels or thresholds for the criteria identified in the Recycling Component... Response: This comment has been noted by the city and will be addressed in the final SRRE for incorporation into the County Integrated Waste Management Plan. LOCAL TASK FORCE AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES COMMENTS This Addendum includes public comments received at two public hearings, one of which , was required by IWMA in order to adopt the waste management plan. A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)/Citiz.en Advisory Committee (CAC) meeting was held on January 17, 1992 and a regional SANDAG hearing held on January 24, 1992. The Local Task Force (SANDAG) hearing held on January 24, 1992 served as the first public hearing for all the San Diego Region's city plans. Comments received at the TAC/CAC meeting 3 , ... )1~ /2(/ ü-f(# ... · and SANDAG hearing are addresSed in this Addendum, and will be considered in the preparaûon of the Final SRRE. , The following are the comments ~m the TAC/CAC and LTF, and responses to their respecûve comments. These com1ents have covered all sections of the SRRE document, and the changes which are recommended will be incorporated in the final SRRE. These are referenced and listed below. TAC/CAC Meetln2 - JanuarY 11. 1992 Comment: There seems to be a: large variation between jurisdicûons of the percentages of waste diverted from the landfills. Response: i . The documented percentages of waste diverted from the landfills and I quantities recycled by each jurisdiction is a result of the specific recycling programs provided by each city and their respective differences. Frequency of curbside collection may vary from weekly to bi-weekly, and the types of , recyc1ables collectc¡d also varies from city to city. Some curbside collection programs serve only residents (single and multi-family), and others may i also serve businesses. The level of participation practiced by the i participants is also a factor in diversion rates. Additionally, there exists a different level of cømmercia! or industrial development in each city, which , would influence the waste composition and diversion rates. Comment: How is backyard eomposting going to be approached? Response: The City of San Diego plans on implementing a pilot backyard composting I program in conju~ction with their ha~er and the County of San Diego. , Some cities within the county have similar programs and others will pursue 4 /tj-/~ / .. / ~- .f.~- -~-~._."..- --'..',-- --------~-- .--...- a strong public education campaign which presents the advantages of backyard composting and recycling of yard and wood wastes. Comment: Cities must work with local businesses to promote voluntary recycling in order to eventually impose mandatory recycling. Also, requirements to be in compliance with the recycling programs by businesses should not be a condition of obtaining a business license. Response: Mandating compliance of recycling programs as a condition to obtain a business license will be a solution considered by many of the jurisdictions. However, businesses will initially be encouraged to develop their own recycling and waste diversion plans voluntarily, before further action will be considered by the cities. Comment: Should recyclables be collected by one truck and the material sorted by a second truck, and should the method of recycling be decided upon regionally or locally, rather than mandated by the County'? Response: The materials recycled should be kept consistent regionally, but the decision for the method of recycling should be made at the city level. Each city currently has the authority to decide the method of collection, provided designated recyclables are not taken to the landfill. Comment: (From the Environmental Health Coalition) Source reduction is mandated by the State as the highest priority of diversion in AB 939, yet the actual percentages documented do not account for a substantial percentage of diversion for each city. Response: There appears to be a need for better defined source reduction activities identified by the State in order for more reliable quantification of source 5 . )1-/- / J.-~ ~ . , reduction. Cities could take the initiative of implementing additional source reduction activities,' and then add these documented diversion quantities to the SRRE. However, it is anticipated that source reduction will not result in a significant percentage of waste reduction. ! SAJIo"DAG RearlnS! - Januarv 24, 1992 , Comment: (From the Environmental Health Coalition> Source reduction quantified by each city is not adequate and it is suggested that a Source Reduction Task , Force be fonned ill order to implement source reduction programs. Response: This may be ta1ceninto consideration by each city. Comment: The Sierra Club made three points and are as follows: a. The quantity of waste going into the landfùls needs to decrease, b. More defined categories of waste products, not identified in the SRRE as recyclables, need to be diverted fiom the landfills and recycled, apd; c. The responsibility of recycling should remain with the individual Response: The City concurs 'with these comments Comment: (From the polystyrene Packaging Coalition) Polystyrene should replace .styrofoam" and be added to the list of projected waste quantities to be diverted and recycled. Response: The City concurs with the comment, although quantifying the amount of polystyrene diverted from the landfill may be difficult. 6 )Jj~/J-} . J- ~> 7.> -----------,-,_..._------_._----.--~-~--_._..._.-.__._..-----<--_._--~._------_._._.._--_._-,- · Comment: The State should be encouraged to reduce the restrictive regulations which have been mandated for composting facilities. This effort should be done by the TAC and CAC. Response: This action will be considered and decided by the CACrrAC and the LTF. , Comment: Waste composition data for taCh jurisdiction is not adequate and the-data needs to be further broken down, especially the miscellaneous category. Response: The County will be conducting more detailed waste composition studies, which is estimated to be completed mid-summer 1992. This study will be incorporated into each city's SRRE and submitted for inclusion in the CIWMP required to be adopted by 1994. 7 /!///;2Ý ... )-£Y? · CITY OF CHULA VISTA 1990 WASTE GEN~T10N cOMPosmON FOR ALL WASTE GENERA . RS UNDER CURRENT CONomONS i DISPOSED Dll/ERTED GENERATED Dll/ERTED WEIGKT '" WEIGKT '" WElGKT '" '" (T'OHS) (T'OHS) (T'OHS) PAPER CAFlDBOAFID 12.017 6.2% 12.711 6.11% 24.136 12_1"- 6.11% NEWSPAPER 1,'38 4.2% Q 0.0% 1.205 4.2% 0.0% MIXED PAPER ".584 6.0% 1/fJ7 0.2% ".10' 6.'''' 0.2% HG LEDGER 2.580 '.3% 0 0.0% 2.580 '.3% 0.0% COMPUTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% PLASTIC FIW PLASTIC 3.568 1.8'" , 0.0% 3,568 1.8'" 0.0% HAFID PLASTIC 4,38' 2.2% 22 0.0% 4,_ 2.3% 0.0% GLASS 4,753 2.4'" '30 0.'''' 4.883 2.5'" 0.'''' METALS TIN CANS 2,175 ,.,'" 0 0.0% 2.'75 ,.,'" 0.0% ALUMINUM CANS 402 0.2% '39 0.'''' 504' 0.3% 0.'''' MISC. METALS 0 0.0% 38 0.0% 38 0.0% 0.0% YARO WASTE 31,288 ,e.'''' 0 0.0% 3',288 ,e.,,,, 0.0% WOOD WASTE '7,456 1.0% 0 0.0% '7,456 1.0% 0,0% CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE 1,182 0.6% 0 0.0% '.'82 0.6% 0.0% ASPHALT 65 0.0% 0 0.0% 65 0.0% 0.0% DIRT /ROCKS/SAND 3,31e '.1"- 0 0.0% 3.3,e '.1"- 0.0% ROOfiNG 888 0.4'" 0 0.0% 888 0.4'" 0.0% DRYWALL 0481 0.2% 0 0.0% 048' 0.2% 0,0% MIXED '3.024 6.1"- 0 0.0% '3.024 6.1"- 0.0% OTHER DIAPERS ·3._ 2.0% 0 0.0% 3,_ 2.0% 0.0% MISCELLANEOUS 58,773 30.3% 5 0,0% 58,776 30.3% 0.0% SPECIAL WASTES 216 0.'''' M5 0.3% 83' 0.5'" 0.3% TOTALS '78,886 '4,071 '84;057 7.3"- TONS DIVERSION SOURCE REDUCTION, 0 0.0% RECYCUNG i '3,_ 6.t% COMPOSTlNG 0 0.0% SPECIAL WASTE M5 0.3% , '4.07' 7.3"- , i REMOVAL Of RECYCLABLE .:tTERIAL FROM RECYCLABLE WASTE STREAM '1.3"- REMOVAL Of WOOD AND Y. WASTE FROM WOOD AND YARD WASTE STREAM 0.0% .. _CHLVST2.WC' /'//)-r;' :f~ --- --~------~~-_..~-_._.- CITY OF CHULA VISTA 11195 WASn GENERATION COMPOSmON - FOR ALL WASn GENERATORS WITH SRRE IMPLEMENTED DISPOSED DIVEFITEO GENERATED DIVERTED WEIGHT " WEIGHT " WEIGHT " " (TCNI (TCNI (TCNI , PAPER CARDBOARD '3,0'5 e.2'l' '3,118' e.7'I' 27,oœ 7.7'1' e.ß NEWSPAPER .,847 2.3'1' .,- ,- 1,11I7 ..5'1' ,- MIXED PAPER 7,'34 3.." 5,755 2.7'1' '2,1ISIO e.." 2.7'1' HG LEDGER '.5'. 0.7'1' '.28' O.ß 2.7a4 ,.." 0.8'1' COMPUTER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% PLASTIC FILM PLASTIC 2,_ '.0% ',772 0.8'1' 3.. 2.0% 0.1'1' HARD PLASTIC 2,583 '.2'1' 2,'15 '.0% .,7'" 2.." '.0% GLASS 2,829 ,.." 2,359 ,.,,, 5.289 2.ß ,.,,, METALS TIN CANS '.276 0.8'1' ,.- 0.5" 2,356 '.2'1' 0.5'1' ALUMINUM CANS 2'3 0.'" 373 C.2'I' 586 0.2'1' 0.2'1' MISC. METALS 3i 0.0% 0 0.0% 38 0.0% 0.0% YARD WASTE 23.059 ".0% .'0,_ 5.2'1' 33.8118 17.2'1' 5.2'1' WOOD WASTE '2.86' e.'" e._ 2_ ,..- 11.8'1' 2.11% CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE - 0.3'1' 592 0.3'1' '.29' C.7'I' C.3'I' ASPHALT 311 0.0% 32 C.O% 70 C.O% C.O% DIRT /ROCKS/SAND ',- C.II% ',846 C.ß 3,$9' '.8'1' C.ß ROOFING 756 c.." C C.O% 756 c.." C.O% DRYWALL 52' C.2'I' C C.O% 52' C.3'I' C.O% MIXED ,..'06 e.7'I' 0 C.O% ,..'06 7.2'1' C.O% OTHER DIAPERS 2,.76 '.2'1' ',1150 0.8'1' ..'25 2.,,, 0.8'1' MISCELLANEOUS 56,1135 27.'" e.72!i 3.2'1' 13,'" 32.3'1' 3.2'1' SPECIAL WASTES 3'C 0.'" - C.3'I' ',coa C.2'I' C.3'I' , TOTALS ,.11,'34 I' ,0015 21C,'78 21.11% TONS DIVERSION SOURCE REDUCTION ',1150 0.8'1' RECYCLING .,..', '11- COMPOS11NG 18,_ 1.0% SPECIAL WASTE - 0.3'1' 11,0015 29.0% REMOVAL OF RECYCLABLE ~TERIAL FROM RECYCLABLE WASTE STÆAM 52.." REMOVAL OF WOOD AND YAAD WASTE FROM WOOD AND YAAD WASTE STÆAM 32.0% )Lj~/.;2b . CHLVST2.WQ, ¡ø:ff' ·' , CITY OF CHULA VISTA 2000 WASTE GEN~RATlON COMPosmON FOR All WASTE GENEM ORS wmt SRRE IMPLEMENTED DISPOSED DIVERTED GENERATED DIVEFI'1ëD WEIGHT % WEIGHT % WEIGHT % % (n)NS !I'ONII (TONI) PAPER CARDBOARD 13,550 5.2% 14.341 U% 27,11II1 7.7% 5.Ø% NEWSPAPER 1,602 D.7% 7,s75 1.5% '.178 4.5% 1.5% MIXED PAPER 2,51. 1.2% 1D,783 5.('(, 13.312 5.4% 5.('(, HG LEDGER 484 D.2% 2,402 1.1% 2,186 1.4% 1.1% COMPUTER D D.('(, D D.('(, D D.('(, D.('(, PLASTIC FILM PLASTIC 67D D.3% 3,323 1.5% 3.11.2 2-('(, 1.5% HARD PLASTIC &44 D.4% 4.058 ''''' 4,1103 2-4% ''''' GLASS 1.038 D.5% 4,424 2-('(, 5,_ 2.W 2-('(, METALS TIN CANS 408 D.2% 2,025 D.9'(, 2,433 1.2% D.9'(, ALUMINUM CANS 219 D.1% 386 D.2% - D.2% 0.2% MISC. METALS 40 D.('(, D D.('(, 40 D.('(, D.('(, YARD WASTE 5,4i8 2-5% 28.sœ 13.W 3$,008 17.2% 13.W WOOD WASTE 3.067 1.4% 15,4S9 7.W 1'.526 '.W 7.Ø% CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE 223 0.1% 1,110 0.5% 1,333 D.7% D.5% ASPHALT 12 D.('(, 60 D.('(, 73 D.('(, D.('(, DIFITIROCKS/SAND 1522 D.3% 3,087 1.4% 3.709 1."" 1.4% ROOFING 781 D.4% 0 D.('(, 781 D.4% D.('(, DRYWAll 538 0.2% D D.('(, 538 D.3% D.('(, MIXED 14.S68 5.7% 0 D.('(, 14,_ 7.2% o.('(, OTHER DIAPERS 1,D78 D.5% 3,182 1.5% 4,261 2-1% 1.5% MISCELLANEOUS 5&,732 27.('(, 7,D15 3.2% &5,747 32,3% 3.2% SPECIAL WASTES 391 0.2% 8119 D.3% 1,090 0.2% D.3% "TOTALS 106.837 110._ 217.286 SO."" TONS DIVERSION SOURCE REDUCTION 3,182 1.5% RECYCUNG 80,801 27"" COMPOSTING 45'- 21.2% SPECIAL WASTE 8119 0.3% 110,_ SO,'(, REMOVAL OF RECYCLABLE ~TEAIAL. FROM RECYCLABL.E WASTE STÆAM 73."" REMOVAL OF WOOD AND YARD WASTE FROM WOOD AND YARD WASTE STÆAM 14.3% . -.c~VST2-WQ' /Lj-/)í J'-4r ,.- --~-- .-.-.....-...---'""..-..-.,-.-.-.--.-.-- -_._-,...._--_._._,_._~-----,-- -~~.__.~.__._.__.._._,_._,_.._- . . TABLE 8-3 CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISPOSAL CAPACITY NEEDS ANALYSIS CAPACITY DISPOSAL NEEDS QUANTITY1 CAPACITY CUMULATIVE YEAR (TONS) NEEDS2 (CY) (CY) 1990 179,986 359,972 359,972 1991 183,582 367,164 727,136 1992 174,595 349,190 1,076,326 1993 164,763 329,526 1,405,852 , 1994 157,185 314,370 1,720,222 1995 149,134 298,268 2,018,490 1996 138,226 276,452 2,294,942 1997 127,601 255,202 2,550,144 1998 117,842 235,684 2,785,828 1999 114,970 229,940 3,015,768 , 2000 106,837 213,674 3,229,442 2001 107,784 215,568 3,445,010 2002 108,731 217,462 3,662,472 2003 109,678 219,356 3,881,828 2004 110,636 221,272 4,103,100 2005 111,583 223,166 4,326,266 2006 112,531 . 225,062 4,551,328 , IIncorporates projected reduction in the wastestream from recycling activities 2Assumes 1000 pounds per cubic yard in-place density . /L/~/;2 ~ .. ¡.£ éC sn-T Cf' CA.~FORNlA Pelt Wilson, Governor CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD 1992 @ 8800 Ca CenlC'r Drive Sacramento, California 95826 June 2, Stephanie Snyder Principal Management Assistant City of Chu1a Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chu1a Vista I CA 91910 RE: Board Co_ents On pr.1iminary Draft Source Reduction and Recycling El_ent (SUE) aþd Household Hazardous Waste El_ent (JlJlWE) Dear Ms, Snyder: Please find below co_ents Iby staff of the California Integrated Waste Management Board (the 'Board) on the Preliminary Draft Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) prepared for the City of Chu1a vista. Staff reviewed the Elements for ~omp1iance with Public Resources Code (PRC) section 40000 et seq.and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) I Chapter 19, Planning Guidelines and Procedures for Reviewing and Revising Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plans (The Guidelines). Those comments which reference the PRC or CCR pertain to mandatory requirements and should bel fully addressed in the final SRRE. Comments which request cla~ification, additional information I or definition of terms should also be addressed in the final Element. Other comments or recoMendations are provided for your consideration. Staff found the HHWE to be acceptable and have no comments on this document. Comments on the SkRE are provided below. These comments generally refer to issues which are common to most jurisdictions in San Diego County, They focuS on the initial Solid Waste Generation Study (SWGS). Co_ents on Initia~ Solid Waste Generation Study Summary of Co_ents Staff found the SWGS to be ~nsufficient in terms of providing the data and information required by CCR Section 18722 (Solid Waste Generation Studies--Genera~ Requirements) and CCR Section 18724 (Additional Requirements and Guidelines for the Initial Solid Waste Generation Study), Specifically I the SWGS requires more precise information on the composit~on, quantities and diversion of waste for the City, A1so, it is ~nc1ear that the information presented in the SWGS constitutes a representative determination of the solid wastes generated I diverted ~nd disposed within and by the City as required by CCR Section 187~2(h)(2) (A), . __u__. -, J¡-J2~ '-$f - Printed on Recycled Paper .. /...:-- ---~--~.------.--.-....-----.~..-----~~--.--.----.-.-.------ ._......~..,_._-_.- ,. City of Chula vista SRRE & HHWE Review June 2, 1992 Page 2 Methodology of SWGS Pages 2-31 (Methods Used For Solid Waste Characterisation): This section describes the methodology which was used to determine the quantity and composition of solid waste disposed by the city, The methodology involved two separate activities. First, a hauler survey was conducted to determine how much total waste I in tons, was being disposed by the city at County landfills, The second activity involved identifying and allocating waste disposed by sector based upon truck type, Please explain how this methodology and associated assumptions provides a solid waste generation study which is representative of all residential I commercial I industrial and other sources of generation within the City I as required by CCR section 18722 (h) (2) (A). Please describe the sampling methodology for the waste sorts which were conducted at local landfills to characterize the City's waste stream. The description should include the number of samples collected I the approximate weight of the samples, and how the data specific to the City was disaggregated from the regional data, as required by CCR sections 18722(f) (5), 18722 (h) and 18724(b). Please provide an outline of the system which the City will use to gather data on the quantities and composition of solid waste generated I diverted and disposed as required by CCR Section 18722(0), , Waste Generated Please identify in the SWGS the solid waste generated I by waste category and type, as required by CCR Section 18722(j), Page 2-10 (Public services and Utilities): Please note that the base amount of solid waste from which diversion levels are calculated should 1121 include sludge I according to PRC Section 41781(b) (5), with the passage of AB 1520 (Sheri 1991), the Board has until July 1, 1992 to determine if sludge will qualify for diversion credit. Since sludge may count toward diversion in the , future I the City should identify sludge generation in its initial solid waste generation study I as required by CCR section 18724(d) I but not include it in the waste generation equation contained in CCR section 187229(g) (2), Pages 2-28 ¡ 2-2' (Per Capita Solid waste Generation Rates): The estimated future solid waste disposal quantities for the City were based on an estimated present disposal rate of 7,3 pounds per person per day, Please explain the methodology and assumptions used to produce this estimate so that it represents all residential I /Lj-< /;J {} . , -7'-.J,~J.? - . .' city of Chula vista SRRE , HHWE Review ~ June 2, J.992 Page 3 commercial I industrial and o~her sources of waste generation in the City I as required by CCR Seotion l8722(h), ..s1;e Disposed The waste disposal informati~n contained in Tables 2-8 and 2-9 does not identify the waste cateforiesand types that are required by CCR Section J.8722 (j), Pleðse disagqregate the "Glass" I "Hard Plastic" I and "Mixed Construction" cateqories into the required waste types. It is noted on Table 2-9 that the "other Misc," cateqory represents 32.7 percent of the dispos$d waste and contains multiple waste categories and types, such as "non-ferrous" metals, "inert materials", and "natural" and "synthetic textiles," This approach to waste characterization limits the City's ability to identify and target waste types with dive;sion potential, For example I the City cannot count for diversion those waste types contained in the "other Misc," category becðuse those waste types have not been "identified" in the SWGS, as required by CCR Section J.8724 (d) , Specifically I the City cannot count materials such as tires, food waste, or non-ferrous metals. .aste Diverted paqe. 2-13 (Div.rsion Practices): Please provide data from the recently completed diversion survey, Also, please report diverted material by weight, by waste cateqory and waste type, and by source of generation within the City as required by CCR Section J.8722(i), paqe 2-23: Table 2-4 lists 4,8 tons of "Organic (food wastes)" as being commercially recycled. This cateqory should also be listed on other tables throughout the SRRE to claim it for diversion credit. Comments On Other components of the SRRE Disposal Faci1ity capacity Component Please include in this C01llponent a solid waste facilities need projection which estimates the additional disposal capacity I in cubic yards per year I needed'to accommodate anticipated solid waste qeneration within the city for a lS-year period commencing in 1991, as required by CCR Section ~8744(b), The "Disposal Capacity Needs Analysis" included in the City's SRRE is for the county of San Diego, . II/-I}/ J -- iJ /.; ----~----~- - -~ ----~-~~--~- -~~.._--_._-_._. . city of Chula vista SRRE & HHWE Review June 2, 1992 Page 4 Monitoring and Evaluation of Programs Before program monitoring begins I the City should set limits, levels I or thresholds for the criteria identified in the Recycling Component. without such specific quantitative standards I progress toward the component objectives and overall diversion goals may be difficult to track, If you have questions I please call me at (916) 255-2555, or John Nuffer, at (916) 255-2310, Sincerely, ~~9' ~~ Judith J. Friedman, Manager Local Assistance Branch, South section Planning & Assistance Division cc: Jack Doyle, Chairman I LTF Robert A. Hawfield, Jr" Project Manager, CDM Reed Bennett I San Diego County Public Works Department . J;J- /);¿ ,:-...¿..¡ / /- I .' . November 30, 1992 TO: Lance Fry, Assistant Planner FROM: Stephanie Snyder I Principal Management Assistantr SUBJECT: SRRE Review- Revisions to Potential Development Data Thank you for your suggested changes to the data and format of Table 2-3 (page 2-8) of the, Draft SRRE you reviewed in November 1991, At that time I you prøvided corrected dwelling unit counts and a revised I more detailed, format. Your comment was that a more detailed inventory may better serve the program planning needs in the long run, You also felt, it was helpful to have information on current commercial and industrial projects in Chula Vista and their status relative to the development approval process. As you know from our recent discussions I the legislation regarding requirements for implementing AB939 have been changing in the past year since your recommendaitions were made. In addition I the deadline for the submittal of the Countywide plan (which will incorporate Chula Vista's SRRE) has been extended beyond the January 1994 date, Because of these changes, I am recommending to the City Council that the SRRE be adopted with a few amendrnents, subject to future legislation and updated information, I am including this memo as part of the attachment which will go on to the County, It will serve as a reminder to check the need to update the potential development data at the time the Countywide plan is recommended for adoption I if it is determined that data of this nature (in the format you have suggested) is still important to the SRRE for recycling program planning purposes. /v¡~ I J) . ~. FfJ-- /J ---_._~_._- MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING Resource Conservation Commission Chula Vista, California 6;30 P.M. Conference Room ¡/¡II Monday, January 9, 1995 Public Services Building CALL MEETING TO ORDERlROLL CALL: Meeting was called to order at 6:32 P.M. by Chair Burrascano. City Staff Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid called roll. Present: Commissioners Hall, Marquez, Fisher; absent: Ghougassian, Guerreiro. It was MSUC (Hall/Fishcr) to not excuse Commissioners Ghougassian and Guerreiro from the meeting since they did not call in for excused absence. Guests present: Lance Becker, agent for applicant Church of Joy; Amy Wolfe, Planning Dept. APPROVAl. OF MINUTES: It was MSUC (Fisher/Hall) to approve the minutes of the meeting of November 7, 1994; 4-0, motion carried. It was MSUC (Hall/Fisher) to approve the minutes of the meeting of November 21, 1994; 4-0, motion carried. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Michael Meacham reported on the Used Oil Opportunity Grant for 1995/1996, which would provide curbside oil recycling services to the City. Hall opposed any kind of rate increase, and also preferred more available service centers rather than to allow used oil along with other recyclables at the curbside. She opposed the general concept of the grant but agreed to vote for approval for the second year of the program. It was MSUC (Burrascano/Hall) to approve recommendation of the grant; 4-0, motion carried. [Agenda items taken out of order to accommodate guests present]. 2. Review of Negative Declaration IS.95-12, Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Elemènt: Meacham explained this negative declaration was already accepted in 1992 and must be resubmiued to conform to CEQA Guidelines for formality only. It was MSUC (HdIBurrascano) to recommend approval; 4-0, motion carried. 3. Review of Church of Joy Negative Declaration for 15-94-28 and CS-95-02: The project area was described as containing unoccupied coastal sage scrub. Many other plant species were found on the property as indicated on the report. Although some were being replanted, its survivability was listed as very low. Lance Becker, agent for the applicant, answered questions. Marquez said she would like to encourage the applicant to maintain as much of the natural vegetation as possible. Fisher suggested that in the future, Pacific Southwest Biological Services conduct its surveys during the proper seasons when some of the habitat are more apt to be present, thus providing a more accurate report. It was MSUC (Hall/Marquez) to recommend approval of both IS-94-28 and CS-95-02; 4-0, motion carried. ;L/ / /JY --- M______"."_,,__________. -_..~._----."-~~-_._-_._._-- - 4820682 EXPRESS SECRETARIAL 796 P03 FEB 01 '95 14: 17 . , Resource Conservation Commission Page 2 4. Review of Negative Declaration for 18-95-11, Eastlake High Tech/Bio Tech zone: Amy Wolfe ftom the Planning Department ~eponed that the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission have already a~proved this item, and that the City was attempting to streamline and simplify the regulatory process within the Eastlake project area. It was MSUC (HallIBurrascano) to recommend approval of the negative declaration; 4-0, motion carried . 5. Review of Coastal Scrub Loss Permit for CS-95-0S, Jehovah Witness, was continued to the next meeting. 6. Review of Coastal Scrub Loss Permit for CS-95-04, OTC Wueste Road: Doug Reid explained that tlús loss pennit process may not even be necessary. After a brief discussion, it was MSUC (Fisher/Burrascano) to accept the notice ofproposa1; 4-0, motion carried. 7. Review of Negative Declaration for 18-95-13, Solid Waste Diversion: After a brief explanation of the impact of transport of solid waste to Miramar, it was MSUC (FisherlHaIl) to recommend approval of the negative declaration; 4-0, motion carried. 8. Communication iTom Taxpayers for Preservation: It was MSUC (Fisher/Burrascano) to read and accept the letter as sent; 4-0, motion carried. 9. Review of the Planninf Commission Agenda for January II, 1995: Public hearings; no action by the commission. STAFF REPORT: The CEQA assembly will be on January 26,1995 at 6P.M. CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS: New members are needed on the commission. Doug Reid reported he met with Mayor Horton who stated she will be fiUing a position. She also requested a council subcommittee oversee the attendanCe records oCthe various commissions. COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS: Fisher noted that Mitch Beauchamp, owner/consultant of Pacific Southwest Biological, is a newly elected councilman for the City ofNationaJ City. This position could possibly pose a conflict of interest in dealing with the City of Chula Vista; Doug , Reid to consult with the city attorney. Fisher also requested City business cards for purchase. i I ADJOURNMENr: The meeting was adjourned by Chair Burrascano at 8:38 P.M. Respectfully submitted, EXPRESS SECRETARIAL SERVICES ~~' I Jl//J}~ i. --" --......-- : '. SUBJECT: ~""t LOCATION: 'ž:9. . -+ - \"'~. SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICA ON·· BY FAX _; BYHAND_; BYMAJL PUBLICATION DATE MAJLED NOTICES TO PROPERTY 0 NO. MAJLED PER GC §54992 Legislative Staff, Con tTUction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122 LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK COPIES TO: Administration (4) / Planning Originating Department Engineering ,/ Others City Clerk's Office (2) V/ POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 7/93 ·55· ;'/-- JJ? NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL ofChula Vista, California for the purpose of adopting the final versions of the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element and the Household Hazardous Waste Element as required by AB 939, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989. An Initial Study, IS-95-12, of possible significant environmental impacts has been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator. A finding of no significant environmental impact has been recommended. The Initial Study, final version of the City's Source Reduction an Recycling Element and the Household Hazardous Waste Element are on file in the office of the Planning Department and are available for public review. For information please contact, Barbara Reid 691-5097 or Michael Meacham at 691-5122. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this proposal in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing date. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, February 7, 1995, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth A venue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: December 28, 1994 COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests individuals who may require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service to request such accommodation at least/arty-eight hours in advance for meetings andfive days in advance for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the City Clerk's office for specific infonnation at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) (619) 585-5647. California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired. mtm:srre negdec.not p/// J 7 -_...~_._-_..- __.___u -..,.. -",-_. - -------~._.--~,.._._-_.~----_..,----~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CmJLA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public hearing to consider the following: Purpose of adopting final ver$ions of City's Source Reduction & Recycling Element & the Household Hazardous Waste Element as required by AB 939, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989. If you wish to challenge the City's aetion on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or some6ne else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, February 7, 1995, at 4:00 p.m. in tie Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any p~rson desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: January 3, 1994 J'/~/}Y .'.-...'."---.------ -_...__.__._.~ ....._.._.._..~~_..._._-_._..__._..__..,. _ _ ··_.·.____.··'.n___~.__·"' ' _ . _ _ ~__ __ _ _ .__ . -.....-. ..- - ..--.-..-- ~ ~~ \ "\ ~ _ C\.. < <_.D 'ì\.\v\..A.t. \ \ (c}J INDWELLER MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION (619) 425-1433 Proposal to Strengthen Community Planning Infrastructure for Sustainable Development Submitted by Teresa AJand, Executive Director Requested Funding: $35,000 February 8, 1995 Border 2000 Planning Grants Program United States Environmental Protection Agency Office oflntemationalActivities 401 M Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20460 ð~~. -) .._~..- -- ___.__.._.____._.__~_~__.___._~_",___.a INDWELLER Februarv 8. 1995 INDWELLER a project application for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of International Activities Border 2000 Planning Grants Program 1. Project Description INDWRI.I ·F.1t (Infrastructure Dealing with waste Well Earth Restoration), a non-profit 23701(e) Mutual Benefit Corporation, is an Eco- Business League/Trade Association serving a border community (EPA Region 9, based in the City ofChula Vìsta, California, located at the U.S./Mexico border) which promotes environmentally-sound eçonomic growth that improves the border environment. INDWF.T.I .F.~ is a pro-active participant in the development of a long-range, needs-based environmental plan for the border community and seeks to promote greater coordination between border communities and EPA/SEDESOL by participating in Border 2000 and BECC. INDWRI.I.F.I{ addresses a specific problem area, solid waste m,mngement, with a local solution, RECYCLING RECOVERABLE RESOURCES; conducts an ongoing community outreach via ¡¡ducational workshops and public-awareness events to ensure public and small-business involvement in recycling; seeks to strengthen the border community's capacity to be responsive to the need for recycling by proposing to cooperatively develop a new resouroe-reoovery infrastructure; promotes ecopreneuring, specifically resource-recycling products and services, and advocates green businesses and the agroecology industry as a viable basis for environmentally-sound economic growth; and proposes to strengthen cooperative informatiort-sharing via the creation of an environmental- information clearinghouse (database library). Consistent with OlA's Border 2000 Planning Grants Program objectives, INDWRI.I.F.I{ benefits the local border community by DarticiDatinl! in Dlannin~ and orl!anizinl! the UDcominl! Border 2000 binational 5-vear environmental plan and by helpin~ to build this bordercommunitv's caDacitv to be resDonsive to environmental needs peculiar to U.S. cities in the U.S./Mexico border area, Le., to define and prioritize its environmentaVecological needs, to communicate these identified needs to the EPA, and to develoD and DartiCÍ'pate in imDlementinl! locally-based stratelric solutions. Page 1 é4~ -c:Z ._~-+--_...._.,--_._----,-------~---_._-- INDWELLER Februarv 8. 1995 INDWELLER's program objectives; for the grant period are: 1. To identify and promote colllilborative partnerships and gather contributions for education resources; 2. To procure contracts for daq¡.base, telecommunications, online services, and staffing; , 3. To develop workshops to empower the border community with tools to prevent waste and to create ~esources that improve environmental health; 4. To develop practical, convenient, and reliable methods to collect recoverable resources from the solid wa~te stream; I 5. To plan new public facilities ~ sustain the resource base by supporting interpretive education for fu¡lfilling pollution control needs; 6. To incorporate and encourage pollution prevention philosophy. 7. To facilitate the border community's capacity to yield valuable, meaning full products and services whichi benefit the community and the environment; 8. To provide or seek to provide I a clear vision for the border community in the future; 9. To complement or parallel other environmental/health activities in the area, rather than duplicating existing efforts; Corporate Philosophy and Historical Bap.kground The INDWELLER goal is to provide the most advanced technology, private financing, and holistic management that develops a sustainable system for the conservation of resources through the legislative goals of the California Public Resources Code pursuant to the ~source Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) The INDWELLERTM system !is created for the diversion of waste from all sectors of the municipal solid wast~ stream. The system prevents waste and identifies resources which maintaih the rights of the property owner, tax payer and consumer. INDWELLER's fO$s is on the priorities of the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) ile., waste reduction (prevention), recycling and composting. The emphasis is on s~urce separation of materials for recovery, and the new systems approach to recyqIing. Alternative management to recover resources from the solid waste stream have, and will continue to realize a goal of source reduction, recycling, and collnposting by the year 2000. Page 2 U~~ -3 . --~-,~._......_..__.. ..__._......__._._--~,_.,---_._"-_._._--_._.~--,----- INDWELLER Februarv 8. 1995 INDWELLER was founded for the purpose of providing an education to the public, per the guidelines established by AB 939 which, in effect, charged communities by mandate. Although Califomia municipalities can be fined if they don't conform to the requirements of the AB 939, implementation of these requirements has been obstructed via interpretations of the law. Because the status quo systems (current infrastructure) for dealing with waste (waste hauling and landfilling) waste corporations are threatened with serious loss of economic base from the recycling industry. Obstructive interpretations of the law remain INDWELLER's challenge. Control over resources is the issue...conversion from the waste disposal mindset-economy vs. resource recovery mindset-economy is the greatest challenge. The INDWELLER Board of Directors (See Attachment B) is committed to building a new infrastructure. The new infrastructure will accommodate the conveyance of recoverable resources in an economic cycle. INDWELLER promotes economic development via reclamation of soil, plastic and paper products - three materials readily available in the existing waste stream - for reuse as new products. INDWELLER conducts an ongoing community outreach via educational new letter, workshops, and public-awareness events. Community education promotes public understanding of environmental protection and economic progress as complementary goals. Furthermore, it ensures the public and small-business involvement in recycling as a means to create and sustain that relationship. The INDWELLER goal is to empower communities with tools to prevent waste and create resources that improve environmental health, and quality of life. 2, Project Management and Staff The project strategy for Border 2000 grant funding is development of a multimedia trade network, specifically designed to enhance front-end waste prevention and pollution control. The project would coordinate with other entities in the creation of a new infrastructure to define the local resource base and institute demonstration projects with public-private sponsorship. A centrally located clearinghouse for sustainable development information (resource library) will augment educational seminars and pilot projects, while providing ongoing services for business development and community implementation of the Border 2000 environmental plan. Institutional members of the proposed INDWELLER team bring special expertise in critical areas of resource conservation and recovery. This proposal represents a multi-organizational team of not-for-profit organizations consisting of INfrastructure Dealing with waste WELL Earth Restoration (INDWF.J·T .~); Center for Applied Competitive Technologies (CACT) at San Diego City College; Community Development Department, Border Environmental Commerce Alliance (BECA) in Chula Vista; Business DevelopmentlIntemational Trade Center at Southwestem College; and the Ecological Life Systems Institute, Inc. ŒLSI). (See Attachment B) Page 3 V~~ -;I INDWELLER Februarv 8. 1995 3- Project Services The INDWELLER project ~ll focus on issues related to recycling and resource reuse/recovery, source reduction of waste among manufacturing facilities, and market development of ecologically sustainable industries. To strengthen and facilitate ~ocal involvement in planning along the frontera, INDWELLER will co-spopsor workshops highlighting public/private activities in support of public resources. NGOs and businesses will receive insights to economic development ~hrough recycling, waste minimization and ecologically integrated land use planning. The INDWELLER recycling ¡companies offer customers and locally based organizations educational outrea~. INDWELLER, as a eco-entrepreneurial business league, also promotes de'1elopment of practical, convenient, and reliable methods for resource recovery. ~erever possible, the object is to reclaim discarded materials at the source J:¡efore they merge into a complex waste stream. By increasing the value of organic and nonorganic recoverables, a reasonable profit can be made, cre,ting new jobs, without dependency on large taxpayer subsidies. Community engagement efforts will be coordinated with Ecological Life Systems Institute, Inc. which has r,atural resource planning and water reclamation projects in the U.S. and the border region of Mexico. Specific information to be ~lected and made available include information from several environmental cons tants, agricultural, bioassay, equipment vendors, and appropriate technolo$Y research centers; such as,the Border Environmental Technologies Res0o/ce Center (BE'llfC) and the High Technology Resource Center (Ifl'RC) linkages proposed by the Border Environmental Commerce Alliance (BECA). 4, Budget Description EYnPnQPQ GrantS In·Kind S Thtal Rud_t a. Consultation/staff hours $10,000 $5,000 $15,000 Workshops (San Diego, Ba,ja) $ 8,000 $4,000 $12,000 b. Fringe Benefits i ø ø ø c. Travel $ 500 ø $ 500 d. Resource library, database $ 5,000 $20,000 $25,000 and BBS I e. Publicity, quarterly newsletter $ 7,000 $ 3,500 $10,500 (postage, printing) f. Contract admin. $ 3,000 ø $ 3,000 g. Construction ø ø ø h. G&A (materials, utilities) $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 3,000 1. Yearly single audit $ ? ? ? . . . 1UI'AL $35,000 $34,000 $69,000 Page 4 éYA~ ~3 - ----" ._-_..._,-_..~-_._".._"---'.._--,-._--~ "'---~ INDWELLER Februarv 8. 1995 5, Budget and Fiscal Management To minimize direct overhead and administrative costs, project participants will provide in-kind services or facilities match to be coordinated through local government, community college and/or tribal agency offices. For example, the Border Environmental Commerce Alliance (BECA) in Chula Vista will provide important linkages with other local, state and federal programs. The CACT-SD at San Diego City College will also provide a facility site for meetings/workshops and expand its new resource library and reference service bureau to include environmental planning infonnation related to clean manufacturing regulations, sources of technical expertise and market development. Additional contributions of meeting places for seminars will be coordinated through Southwestern College Small Business Development/International Trade Center, and through the existing telecommunications at established facilities, the new infrastructure will be built and facilitate online library data base access. (See Attachment B) Public facilities provide the basic foundation and fundamentals for education, energy and economic transfer/exchange. Therefore, each component enhances and networks existing institutional activities and does not duplicate them. In fact, the project meets a serious need in the region as a clearinghouse with proactive dissemination of sound technical and business knowledge at the grassroots, community levels. Monitoring results will be ongoing samplings through surveys, inventory of projects, and regional border demographic census. Each objective yields a tangible product that will strengthen citizen involvement and responsibility for improving environmental health. The targeted audience is local, small-business owners and entrepreneurs, and the general public. INDWELLER educational and consulting proceedings and financial accounting system is stored at the INDWELLER headquarters database. Infonnation will be continuously updated, and the project will be evaluated on a quarterly basis. 6. Conclusion In conclusion, INDWF.T·T.F.ltconcurs with the EPA that recycling means business, and common barriers for recycling business market development must be mitigated. Local and regional integrated waste management plans have since , focused on costly, centralized facilities that have had negative economic impacts. A new and innovative public facility land use for the collection, processing and marketing of local resources is the most cost effective and environmentally efficient way to support integrated waste management. INDWELLER will assist the United States and Mexico Border 2000 with a new strategy to protect and improve the border environment. If funded, INDWELLER will strengthen the community infrastructure with related appropriate land use, technology and jobs. INDWF.T.T ·F.1t thanks the U.S. EPA for its time and consideration of this project. Page 5 , -? {/~~. Attachment A Project Manager Resumes t - , ð~~·~7 -----,_.__....--_....._----~.,._----+-_._+.._..~_._- - .---.-.-.. Teresa Chavez Aland Owner of Mother-A-Land Recoverable Resource Management 1433 Nacion Avenue Date ofBinh: 05-23-50 Chula Vista, CA 91911 Social Security Number: (619) 425-1433 569-80-4571 Education: 1967-1968 BLAIR HIGH GRADUATE Pasadena, CA Mexican-American ScholarShip Award Cultural advisor to faculty Uno-Mundo Community Peer Club Founder 1975-1992 SOUTHWESTERN CO~LEGE Chula VISta, CA . Associate Degree in Scienc~, Management Office Automation Specialist Certificate Management Certificate Landscape Design Certificate Continuing Education courses Transfer in Liberal Arts Experience: 1981-1988 COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER Chula Vista, CA * Mother of five supporting ~ucational activities * Curriculum Advisory and Teacher's Aide * Award for "Trash Monsters" Art 1983 Waste Management * Chula Vista Community Hospital Jr. Volunteer Chairperson 1988-1992 * Chula Vista 2000 Citizens Planning for the 21st Century * Otay Ranch New Town Ci:izens Advisory, Sub-committee Chair * Founder and Executive Ditector of INDWELLER Experience: 1989-1992 SELF -EMPLOYED San Diego County * Mother-A-Land Landscape Service * Certified MWBE 1991-1994 * Recoverable Resource Consultant * INDWELLER Resource Recovery Park * RFP, North County (SD) SPA * RFP, City of Chula Vista for Solid Waste Services * BofA, Americorp, DOC, &: TAP Grant applications * The Learning Annex Speaker * Community Garden I Conimunity Supported Agriculture * Earth Fair participant at Balboa Park 3-years Professional Affiliation: California Resource Recovery Association National Recycling Co~lition Californians Against Waste California Alliance with Family Farmers References: Sharon Hudnall,Reponse Management (619) 287-9041 George Kremple, Deputy City Manager, City of Chula Vista Gretchen Brewer, Ear~h Circle (619) 459-5320 ¿þ.f~. -y .---.- . -"~-"----'---'~-'"'-"'--'" RESPONSE 11111 MANAGEMENT A c T I 0 N T H R 0 U G H C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N Resume SHARON A. HUDNALL DIRECTOR, RESPONSE MANAGEMENT Management consultant to U. S. and international high technology firms providing environmental market research; competitive analysis; strategic planning; knowledge/technology transfer; regulatory and legislative tracking; customer satisfaction; quality improvement; risk and environmental co=unications. Also certified in industrial training and instructional systems des~gn using video tapes, workshops, and computers. EDUCATION MA., Literature, San Diego State University, 1975. BA., English and JournaIism, University of Møry1and/USIU, 1972. LANGUAGES: Fluent in French; working understanding of Spanish and Russian. SELECTED CLIENT PRO.JECTS o ISUZU Truck of America: Customer satisfaction surveys for Quality Service Improvement program for truck distribution network. o General Atomic: Researched commercial technologies and market for high level radioactive waste storage. o Science Applications International CorporatlÍon: Market research and strategic dccisionmaking support for technology transfer into commercial markets' for risk management services, training and information systems, and environmental solutions using Star War. laser technologies. o Various Utilities: Developed Demand-Side 'Market Training Programs for electric companies. o Japan-NUS (JANUS): Study of artificial intelligcnce applications in the banking and finance, utility and oil and gas industries. o U.S. Navy Department of Morale, Welfare, II/Id Recreation, Nl~ Coronodo. Conducted survey and led focus groups to develop an organization-wide service improvement program. Program covered MWR administrative functions (personnel, finance, marketing, clerical), recreation, restaurants, child care, special cvents. at cz--- 1 6373 Lambda Drive ·San Diego. California 92120· (619) 2R7-9041 . ..__...__...._---~,..~-_.._~~-_.- Attachment B Letter of Commitment ~~ .-/t/ -~,--,_.,------_._-- -"."..._...._~---_.._~------~._-_..._----,_._~._. INDWELLER INfrastructure Dealing with Waste WELL Earth Restoration a non·profit mutual benefit CÐq)01'8tion February 7,1995 Dear Mr. Valdez, Thank. you for the OpportUIÙty to respond to the Border 2000 Planning Grants Program. The INDWELLER organization has been active in the South County/Mexico border since 1989. This business league/trade association is the only entity in San Diego County with holistic resource management goals that represents the people in these border communities. INDWELLER's long-term sustainable growth and economic development goals can be, achieved. Because We Dwell W"úhin The Earth's E1Wironment, the INDWELLER Board of Directors listed below is committed to building a new infrastructure to deal with waste well and restore the earth. Teresa Aland Mother-A-Land Consulting (619) 425-1433 1433 Nacion Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91911-5513 Perla Vizcarra, Secretary Student of Psyehology 619) 425-3890 1015 Nonna Court Chula Vista, CA 91911 ADa Cortez, Treasurer Student of Liberal Arts (619) 233-5437 1433 Nacion Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91911 Don Argleben Asphalt & Concrete RecyeIing (619) 440-5737 P.O. BOX 2177 EI Cajon, CA 92021 Sharon Hudnall Response Management (619) 287-9041 6373 Lambda Drive San Diego, CA 92120 Sincerely, ,~~~(â~- Teresa Aland Executive Director INDWELLER Headquarters 1433 Nocion ~~ ~ia:!~fit Section 2370Ie . .._ __._ .u_, ~..__~_. _.- 1313 Twelfth Ave., San Diego, CA 92101-4787 (619) 230·2080 FAX: na'll62 Center for Applied Competitive Technologics (CACT) February 2, 1995 Paul Valda Office of International Activities U.S. Envlronmenlal Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Mr. Vakb: The Center for Applied Competitive Technologies at San Diogo City College (CACT -SO) is prepared to actively 5Uppcn development of die Border 2000 stnltegy and planning activities through development of an Informaûon Center and RC50urce Library. The Infonnation Center and Library will provide reference data and function as a service bureau to border communities, academic institutions and businesses requiring timely, reliable information about environmental topics and local expcrti"" Cpr environmental œchnology uansfer. Funher, it will promote ac.ccss to and use of clean manufacturing processes, including soun:e reduction and resource recovelY. The CACT·SD is one of eight re¡,'ionalleChnology ccnlCtS des.igna1e4 by the State of California to assist area manufacturers Ihrough education. lraining and t~hnology transfer SCTViees 10 modernize their production capabiliLÌes. As the Regional Manufacturing COnler serving San Diogo and Imperial Counties, the CACT-SD has been involved in the following activilies: . Since 1991, the CACT has participated in a cooper.JÛve a¡¡reement with LawrelU Livennore and Sandia National Labotatories to provide assislal\Ce in Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing (ECM) practices. CACT lw organized Iae.a1 workshops and hosted inter-regional teleconferences addressing environmental challenges and solutions. . The CACT, In cooperation with CalEPA locally, has participa1e4 in two business forums sponsored by the '¡ ,.; San Diego County Environmental HO$!th ScrvicC!S PolluLÌon Prevention Program to assist local ~ manufacturing companies in identifying and accessing resowces. .~ . RcccnUy, the CACT hag received approval from the U.S. EPA to administer examinations and conduct .: seminars for EP A cenification in all categories of CFC and HCFC replacemenL :m! The CACf is prepared to provide enhanced services as specified in the auached proposed activities description and .~~ offers an in-ldnd match of $20.000 in library and infomwlon facilities to augment the development of the border ~~ environmenlal plan and educational outreach p~gram. We believe die creation of the environmental resource library ~1:t:~ ~iII make 8 cri~al contribution to a :n!ccessful vision for improving the environment, public health and prosperity ",~~, In u.s. and MexICan border commumues. ....'..~.:.~~¥.~.~\. Sincere~y, ~L ~. ¡j~ ,,"if; /' S7ë. Y./A. ~l ·-0 r~ ~.:-~",.. 1;~. Joan ¡;. Stcpsis, Ph.D. Jerome Hunter, Ed.D. .!;~<I) Dean¡'Direc1Dl' President ,~~, San Diego City College CACT San Diego City College ,~~. cc: 1) City of CbuIa Vista Community Development Depanment ,~I 2) Southwestern College Small B¡¡siness Development Center :::''.$~ '\'("'.' '.~ ':;"~'f!' ¡~ Partners/lips in Employee TrrlÎning 1:'~ Bus;lIes.s -Industry - Government .:¡-"',-..~ ·'¡"f!.iS~· -':;,':-;,1 ~~ ~ / -/~ "'( -..~, . .<,.~. . ¡~~,... ..... a .' .....,..... ,d~, ._"o::-"{~' ***END*** _ ~'~ti.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- .._.,--~.__..,.__._, --.-.... .,---_._-~~._..._.._-_.- Ecological Life <' Systems I - I I nstitute, Incorporated February 2, 1995 Sharon Hudnall Pl'Bsldent ResponSÐ Management 6373 Lambda Drive San Diego, CA 92120 Dear Sharon: The development of a I'Bsource library and an educational out reach program to foster seologlcally sustainable development along thÐ U.S· Mexican BordÐT Is very timely and much needed, In addition to helping new organizations and businesses focusing on this araa of need get up to speed, It will also, serve to educate the public about succsssful pro/Bcts like Eco parque which the Ecological Life Systems Institute (ELSI) In partnership with EI Collglo de la Frontera Norte and the Environmental Defencs Fund helped make a reality. The Ecological Life Systems Institute Is extremely pleased to Included as a member of the out standing team of organizations you have aSSÐmbled to further this work. . . Slncel'Bly, - MJ Jim Bell Dlrsetor A Tax-Exempt oJ~ -IJ Nonprofit Since 1978 2923 East Spruce St., San Diego, California 92104 (619) 281-1447 , Printed wiIb Soy BOon !Ilk 011 tJ..h.._..... Recydod!'ape< (~ J'oIO~.....). ......--..... .-.,- .. S\. Win comply, as applicable. with the provisions of \he 12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Riven Act of Davis-Bacon Aa (40 U.S.C. §§276a ID 276a - 7), !be 1968 (16 U.S:C. §§1,Z?1 et seq.) related to proteCting Copeland Acl (40 U.S.C. §§276c and 18 U. S. C. components or potenual components of the national §§874), and the ConLraCt Work Hours and SaCety wild and scenic riven systeID, Samdards Act (40 U.S.C. §§327-333), ~ganling labor 13. Will assist the awanling agency in assuring compliance standards for federally assisted construclion subagreemCIIIS. with Section 106 of the Naùona! Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended '(16 U.S.C. 470), EO 11593 10. wm comply, iC applicable, with nood insurance (identirlCalion and proœcåon of hisIDric propeniea), and purchase requiremenlS of Section 100(a) of the, Rood the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 Disaster ProleC!ÌOn Act oC 1973 (Pl.. 93·234) ~hich (16 U.s.C. 469a-l ct seq.), requires recipients in a special nood hazard ~ ID 14. Wall comply with Pl.. 93-348 ~ganling the prorecùon of panicipate in the program and to purchase: nood insurance if the 1011I cea of insurable COnstnICtitlln and human subjects involved in resean:b, development, and acquisition is 510.000 or mo~. re1ated activities supported by Ihis award of assistance. 11. WiU comply with environmental sWldards which 15. Wall comply with the Labonrory Anùnal WelCare Act of may be prescribed pursuanl 10 the following: (a) 1966 (Pl.. 89·S44, as amended., 7 U.s.C. 2131 el seq.) institution of environmental quality control pertaining 10 the care, handling, and treatment of wann measures under the National EnvironmenraJ Policy blooded animals held for research, teaching, or oilier Act of 1969 (Pl.. 91·190) and Executive Ordeat (EO) activities supported by this a_d of assisIance. 11514: (b) notif'lCaIion of violaûng facilitiea pursuant 16. Will comply willi llIe Lead·Based Paint Poisoning ID EO 11738: (c) pTDIeCtion of wetlands pursuant!1D EO Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 4801 et seq.) which 11990; (d) CV"1....ñl)n of flood hazanIs in OoodpWøs in prohibits the use of lead based paint in consauction or .accordance willi EO 11988: (e) assurance of ""jecl rehabiliwion of ,...ïl!enee SInlCtUl'CS. consistency with the approved State manag.ment program developed under the Coastal 'Zone 17. Will cause 10 be perfonned llIe required financial and Manapent Act of 1m (16 U.S.C. §§1451 ct seq.); compliance audilS in accordance willi llIe Single Audit (f) conformity of Federal actions ID State (Clear Air) Act of 1984 or OMS Circular No. A-I33. Audits of Implemenlalion Plans under Section 176(c) 'C llIe Institutions of Hiiher Learning and other Non-profit Clear Air Aaof 1955, as amended (42 U.s.C. §§ 7401 Instiwtions. ot seq.): (¡) protection of underground sources of 18. Will comply with a1J applicable requùemenlS oC all oilier drinking water WIder the SaCe Drinking Waœr Act oC 1974, as amended. (Pl.. 93·523): and (h) pro1eCtion oC Federal Jaws, executive orders, ~guIations and policiea endangered species under the Endangered Species Act govemingthis prognm. of 1973. æ amended, (pL. 93-205). > . , - SICiNATIJRE OF AlTJ'HORIZED CERTlFY1NO OFFICIAL TITLE tJ¡ÓeLPí L' ~. .'~ I ....... . .' . /) . ; /{lj:,"// ~..~ v¡(ceLuAt/v i - .<L ( " .. , " '1- ( . OROAN1ZATION DATE SUBMJ1TED . '-:¡/I(()JUéJJ---EI\ !P6: g Iff5 I ) ¿J~~ SlMdan:I F_ 4248 (R..... &It'2) 1Mc" -~ ~-- '-"'"'"'--~--'---'--'--'-------'-'---'-~""---- \ . ôEPA EPA~C4nu~__ 1kI_ SlaIN EnWon_ "'.1 øJ 1 ~ WUIIiftgtaft, DC 20410 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Mattera The pI't)SpedIw partJclpant certJtIes to the belt ct lis knowledge and belief that It and lis principals: (I) AnI not presently dåmld, susl*lded, proøc:seð for debllrnln, d~ ineligible, or voIUnlarly excluded from COY1II'ed transactlona by arry Fed.., depanmenr or agency; . (b) Haw not within a thrH yeu partod preceding this proposal been COII\-icted ct or IWS a cIvI Judgemarl rendat8CI against them for commIuIon ct fraud or a cr'.mlllal oftenM In coro"l8Ctlon with obtaining, attempting to obIa/n, or ~ a public (Federal, s..r.. or roc.) transaction or contract und... a public transaction; violation ct Fed..... or State anlllrull .... or commIuIon ct embazzle",.., theft, forgery, bribaty, falsillcallon or daslrUdlon ct recordI, making false statamarù, or receMng stolen propaIty. Ic) M not presently indicted for or 0ItIaIwIM c:rfmInaIIy or c:IvIIy c/wgId by a gcM/'M1ant entity (Fedtrll, Slate, or local) wilt! commlulan ct arry ct the elf..... ~ In panlgraph (1)(b) ct this certJllcatlon; and (d) kaw not within a Ihraa-yeu partod precedlna this appIlcatIon/PlOJCUIIWS one or mora pub/Ic IranSactlona (Fed"', State, or local) tannlnated 10r causa or dafaUt , understand that a lalse statement on thll cartlflcatlon may be QrOUnd. for raactIon ct this proposal or tenninatJon ÇIf the award. In addition, under 18 use Sac. 1001, alalse statement may m~ In a line 01 up 10 $10.DOO or imprisonment for up to 5 years. or both. Teresa Aland, Executive Director , '__u..~---:- ~ . '/., I ." _ --", . ....... . (- /-'} I ,a . - /,a¿f"~ ICu" f-ø¡ ~/ Ir:h s,glWwte of ~iød "-pr:tMft~ ou. o I ~ unable to certify to the IbcM statlments. My explanation II attached. UA ~57DO-C' fI'.... January 31, 1995 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Via: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk\tiYv~ ~ . From: Suzanne Ramirez, Chair, International Friendship Commission Subject: Change of Commission Meeting Day For the next three months the International Friendship Commission will be changing their meeting day from the fourth Monday of the month to the fourth Wednesday of the month. (February 22, March 22, and April 26). The change in day is due to the change in schedule of one of the members. cc: John Goss, City Manager All: 2 1002 15-} ___.._ _...__............_ ......_ _TO_ ....M.__.... .....n.. ......... .'...,,"....""". ,......., &;oIIIQU "'IJ"'.""'''''lct:l'lWf\.ol 1I'Ci1 UIQ' II DRAFT MINUTE$ OF REGULAR MEETING INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP COMMISSION CITY OF GHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA January 23, 1995 4:14 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: James B~ker, Lawrence Breitfelder, Paul Catanzaro, Carol Dysart, Suzanne Ramirez, Terry l1homas arrived at 4:23 P.M. and Nancy Taboada arrived at 4:40 P.M. NON-MEMBERS PRESENT: Doris Cox, Tim Nader and Ricardo Marentez MINUTES: A correction was made in the motion to cut the budget by 10%. The $150.00 from account 5221 Traveil, Conferences and Meetings should be $160.00. MSU (Breitfelder/Baker) To accept the minutes as corrected. Vote: Yes: Baker, Breitfelder, Catanzaro, Dysart, Ramirez Absent: Taboada, Thomas REPORT FROM THE CHAIR: Suzanne Ramirez met with Mayor Horton and advised her that we had two vacancies on the Commission and that number one it would be helpful if we had someone that spoke Japanese and she agreed with that. Number two also encouraged her that if anyone was interested in the IFC to have them come and sit in on one or more meetings so that people will know that this is a busy commission and it's more than just coming and sitting at a meeting once a month but that there is lots of work to be done outside of the meetings. At this time Suzanne introduced Ricardo Marentez. He is very involved with a youth basketball team that has gone down to Argentina. Ricardo has talked to Suzanne on several occasions about our sistE¡r city in Argentina. He had also expressed an interest in being on the Commission so Suzanne encouraged him to attend some meetings and here he is. Mayor Horton hopes to attend one of our meetings in the near future. Barbara Bamberger sent a memo to Suzanne that the City has received an invitation to host an Asian Fellow from a l1hird World country. Chair Ramirez passed the information to Larry Breitfelder. He reported that the Asian Foundation will pay for all his expenses but perhaps the Commission could meet him at the airport and do some hosting for approximately a month. He will be working with the City on environmental issues. 15:3 ,..___~..'__"H .._-_.~-,--~- MSU (Baker/Catanzaro) Motion to appoint Terry Thomas and Larry Breitfelder as the officiallFC welcoming committee for the gentleman from the Asian Foundation. Vote: Yes: Baker, Breitfelder, Catanzaro, Dysart, Ramirez, Thomas Absent: Taboada UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Status Report on Ussurijsk . Carol Dysart handed out a written report at the meeting. She also ask Tim Nader to come to the meeting and speak briefly to the Commission on the trip. Carol was wanting the Commission to take a vote on whether or not to make Ussurijsk a sister city. After much discussion and a brief report from Tim Nader it was decided that this issue would be put back on the agenda next month. Nancy Taboada arrived at 4:40 P.M. MSU (Breitfelder/Baker) Motion to make Carol Dysart's report on Ussurijsk a part of the minutes. Vote: Yes: Baker, Breitfelder, Catanzaro, Dysart, Ramirez, Taboada, Thomas B. Budget Submittal - Ramirez reported that Dan Beintema put the budget together and wrote justification for a one quarter time paid person to be hired for the IFC. The budget has been submitted. C. Status report on May delegation to Japan - Terry Thomas reported that the people of Odawara are looking forward to the arrival of the citizens of Chula Vista and are expecting Mayor Horton to be leading the delegation. Mayor Horton will be asked to speak at the opening ceremonies of the festival. MSU (CatanzarolThomas) Moved that the IFC as a group support Mayor Horton leading the official Sister City Delegation to Odawara and that we as Commissioners support the idea that the City of Chula Vista does have some responsibility to financially support this trip. Vote: Yes: Baker, Breitfelder, Catanzaro, Dysart, Ramirez, Taboada, Thomas MSU (Taboada/Baker) Motion to appropriate up to $500.00 for gifts to take to Odawara. Vote: Yes: Baker, Breitfelder, Catanzaro, Dysart, Taboada, Thomas No: Ramirez· Reason stated: She believes the Commission /.5 -7' - - -- ~.__.__..._._---_._,.__..._._--_._----_._----~--_... .._,------ should have more information as to what gifts are to be purchased at what price for which Japanese counterpart. Motion passed. D. Status Report on Library Exhibit - Terry Thomas gave a brief update on the status of the exhibit for the new library. MSU (Dysart/Baker) Moved that Terry Thomas report be made a part of the minutes and that the IFC once again endorse the concept of a permanent and rotating exhibit at the Chula Vista Library and the museum. Vote: Yes: Baker. Breitfelder, Catanzaro, Dysart, Ramirez, Taboada, Thomas E. Purchase of easel - Paul Catanzaro has not been able to find an easel, will keep looking. Matter to be dropped from agenda until there is something to report. Meanwhile Thomas volunteered to bring to next meeting an exhibit pad she has. NEW BUSINESS A. Election of Vice-Chair (To replace Jerry McDonald) - Chair Ramirez is recommending Breitfelder for Vice-Chair but due to a schedule change he will not be able to attend Monday afternoon meetings for the next three months. Would the Commission like to change the meeting day for February, March and April? MSU (Taboada/Baker) MOfd to change the meetings to the fourth Wednesday of the month a 4:00 o'clock to accommodate Commissioners schedules for the next thre months. (February, March, & April) Vote: Yes: Baker, Breitfelder, Catanzaro, Dysart, Ramirez, Taboada, Thomas MSU (ThomaslTaboada) To nominate Larry Breitfelder for Vice-Chair. Vote: Yes: Baker, Breitfelder, Catanzaro, Dysart, Ramirez, Taboada, Thomas B. Grant Writing - Larry Breitfelder has been looking Into the resources available to us to apply for grants. The Chair asked Larry to write up a report to include with the minutes and have it for next month. C. Goals and Timelines - Aside from Ramirez who provided hers previously, Thomas is the only one that has handed hers in. Ramirez would like to have /,?..5' _.._-----"'------~--~--_..-.._------_.__._--- . the rest of them to Secretary Alexander for inclusion in the next agenda packet. Ramirez is to meet with Taboada and Cox and with Baker to discuss assignments. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS During this time several things were discussed. 1. What did the Commission want to do for the Asian Foundation fellow while he is here? 2. What does Terry Thomas what to do to build interest in the trip to Japan? Taboada suggested that since the Commission has $300 plus prepaid at LaBella's Pizza that could be used for one or the other. Terry will check into the matter. Chair Ramirez asked Paul Catanzaro to please put something in writing about fund raising and submit it to Lorraine in time for mailing for the next meeting. The members asked that the minutes be mailed out before the agenda packet. Minutes will henceforth be mailed as soon as they are ready so that they will have a reminder as to what work is expected of them. COMMUNICATION FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC Ricardo Marentez was asked to attend the meeting as he has expressed an interest in becoming a member of the Commission. He spoke briefly on his trips to Argentina. Meeting adjourned at 6:25 P.M. ~ Lorraine Alexander, Secretary 15"¿' -~--_..__...__.._._._._~..- -.-.-.----------"-..,.,-.-.---------..------"' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item I~ Meeting Date 2/7/95 ITEM TITLE: Ordinance ~~.1£nding Chapter 18.16 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code to Allow for the Posting by Developers of Alternative Forms of Security for Public or Private Improvements Requiring Completion Guaranties in Favor of the City and Making Minor Technical Corrections SUBMITTED BY: Director of Community Depment c;,~ . Director of Public Works City AttorneyCSro.G- &/\,\ß REVIEWED BY: City Managef (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No"X) BACKGROUND: The developers of the Channelside Shopping Center (which includes a 120,000 square foot Wal-Mart) are requesting that a Wal-Mart "corporate guaranty" be accepted as security for the public and private improvements that the City and the Redevelopment Agency are requiring for the Project. The existing City Municipal Code does not expressly contemplate this form of security and will need to be amended in order to allow for the Wal-Mart guaranty and/or other similar forms of "alternative" security. Staff is recommending the necessary amendment to the Municipal Code in light of the cost savings and efficiency resulting for the project developer, the tremendous credit-worthiness ofWal-Mart, and the benefits of the project to the City. Where other corporations of Wal-Mart's credit-worthiness are developing projects in the City, such an amendment may also provide development cost reductions and convenience. In order to be financially prudent, the proposed Ordinance amendment would permit alternative forms of public improvements security only where (I) the improvements being secured are valued at less than $5,000,000, (2) the security offered is 50 times more valuable than the improvements being secured, and (3) there are adequate cost recovery and enforcement mechanisms to access such security in the event of a developer default. The proposed Ordinance amendment also includes various "clean up" revisions which eliminate redundant sections and make minor technical corrections. A copy of the proposed Ordinance amendment is attached hereto. RECOMMENDATION: That the Council introduce the Ordinance amendment with a first reading, consider the Ordinance amendment with a second reading at the meeting of February 14, 1995, adopt the Ordinance after the second reading and, concurrently, waive the existing Ordinance requirements and approve the Wal-Mart Corporate guaranty as an acceptable form of public improvements security (consistent with the terms and conditions of the just approved Ordinance amendment) in order that the developer may acquire and commence development of the project site prior to the formal effective date of the approved Ordinance amendment. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Gatlin Development Company and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. have previously obtained City Council and Redevelopment approval of certain land use entitlements for the development of an approximately 200,000 square foot shopping center, including a 120,000 ¡¿#J _.__._~__~_.. _ . _...w......_.. _ _...___.'____ .__.____..____..___._.__~,..__..M._'_.__.~~_...__. __.._..._'__.M.______·__ '" -~--- ---------_.__.~-- square foot Wal-Mart, to be located between Broadway and 4th Avenues at the northern boundary of the City. City/Agency approval of the project included conditions that require that the developer construct certain public and private improvements at and around the site. Existing City ordinances require that developers constructing public improvements post security with the City assuring the completion of such improvements in the form of a surety bond, a letter of credit or a cash deposit. In order to minimize the expense and inconvenience of this security requirement, Gatlin Development has proposed that it be allowed to secure completion of the required public and private improvements by having Wal-Mart post a "corporate guaranty" of completion pursuant to which Wal-Mart itself would act as the guarantor of completion. The City's existing improvement security ordinances do not contemplate this form of security. Thus, in order to allow for the posting of such security, existing ordinances must be amended. The proposed Ordinance amendment (attached hereto) would permit a developer constructing public and private improvements to submit "alternative" public improvements security (i.e., security other than a surety bond, cash or a letter of credit) only under the following circumstances: 1. The costs of completing the improvements to be secured for a project do not exceed $5 million. 2. The proposed security mechanism is backed by a guaranty or pledged assets valued at at least 50 times the cost of the improvement work being secured. 3. The proposed security mechanism includes adequate remedies which assure reasonable access to such security in the event the developer defaults and the City must proceed itself to complete the required improvements. 4. The City Attorney and the City Engineer approve the form of such security and impose such additional terms and conditions as they deem appropriate. Such conditions shall include, at a minimum, (a) the right of the City to require that conventional replacement security be submitted for any uncompleted improvements at the time that a certificate of occupancy is issued for the project, and (b) developer's agreement to pay the City's attorneys fees and costs if the City must enforce its remedies under the alternative security arrangement. 5. . The City Council shall have the right to approve or disapprove, in its sole discretion, any proposed "alternative" security arrangement. The Wal-Mart corporate guaranty proposed by Gatlin Development and Wal-Mart in connection with the Channelside Shopping Center would qualify under these rigorous standards for acceptable "alternative" security. The improvements being secured are estimated to cost well below the $5 million cap. Wal-Mart has provided independently certified financial statements which demonstrate that its current net worth far exceeds the 50 to 1 coverage ratio proposed in the Ordinance amendment. The form of the proposed Wal-Mart guaranty is substantially similar to the City's existing standard form of surety bond and will afford the City approximately the same remedies against Wal-Mart as it would against a conventional surety company, including the right to collect attorneys fees and costs. Finally, in order to reduce any risk that Wal-Mart might be disinclined to honor its guaranty once it has already opened for business at /¿ ".;. .__..._..__+.~_~_..__ - _____n__. n ._.... ____.____ __..._ . _..m._____ . __ _ ..+_+_____n.._..__._,·. _ _. __0"_,___, __ __..______..M___~_____·_____ the site with respect to any required pubHc improvements which remain uncompleted when Wal- Mart is open for business, City staff is ~etaining the right to require that the Wal-Mart corporate guaranty be replaced with either cash, a third party surety bond or a letter of credit to the extent of such uncompleted public improvements. Pursuant to the conditions for approval of the Precise Plan for the project, the City would also retain the right at such time to deny the issuance of any certificates of occupancy for the remainder of the project until all required public and private improvements were completed. Other jurisdictions in California, including Los Banos, Oceanside and Lake Elsinore, have accepted this form of security from Wal-Mart in lieu of the more conventional third party "surety bond". If the City Council adopts the proposed Ordinance amendment, under applicable law the Ordinance amendment will not formally go into effect until the 30th day after such adoption. This timing is problematic for the developer and may cause a delay in the development of the project. Too much of a delay may result in Wal-Mart's decision to postpone its development of the site until fall of 1996. In light of these circumstances, if the City Council is willing to approve the Ordinance amendment, staff is also recommending that City Council vote to waive the requirements of the pre-amendment Ordinance with respect to the Wal-Mart project in order to allow Wal-Mart immediately to proceed with its proposed "corporate guaranty" security alternative. This would allow the Channelside Shopping Center developer to proceed immediately with the development of this time sensitive project and not wait for the 30 day effectiveness period which applies to the Ordinance amendment. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Ordinance amendment is designed to reduce public improvement security obligation costs where substantial assets or a corporate guaranty of a substantial corporation are being offered as a substitute for conventional forms of improvement security. The kinds of security which would be accepted under the Ordinance amendment should not increase the costs to the City in pursuing such security. In light of the required terms and conditions for posting "alternative" forms of security under the Ordinance amendment, the Ordinance amendment becomes a low risk proposition. M:\home\attomey\wal-sec.113 It r J //{¿~1- __..w._·.'__·__···______·___________···.____····_·'___·-.~_~___.._._._.__.__._.._________".. ---'-'-~-'-'--"- -----~-.,-~-. ,---~--."-.-. .-,-----.- ORDINANCE NO. ;¿~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 18.16 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR THE POSTING BY DEVELOPERS OF ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF SECURITY FOR PUBLIC OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRING COMPLETION GUARANTIES IN FAVOR OF THE CITY AND MAKING MINOR TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS WHEREAS I the City Council has determined that accepting alternative forms of security for the completion of public and private improvements within the city I under certain limited circumstances I is in the best interest of the City by reducing development costs for private developers; and WHEREAS I the city desires to amend Chapter 18.16 of the Chula vista Municipal Code in order (1) to provide for the acceptance of such security I (2) to establish the terms and conditions for such acceptance I and (3) to make other minor technical corrections thereto; NOW, THEREFORE I the City Council of the City of Chula vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I: sections 18,16,150 and 18.16,220 of Chapter 18,16 of the Chula vista Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 18.16.150 city council determination authority--Requirements to be met. A. In the event that all improvements required or conditions imposed as conditions of approval under the provisions of this chapter or by law are not completed before the filing of the final map, the council shall enter into an agreement for the installation of improvements with the subdivider. In such ease, when the agreement and bond I deposit~ er instrument of credit or alternative form of security have be,en approved by the city attorney as to form and by the director of public works as to sufficiency I the council may consider the final map. All signatures except those of the city clerk, city attorney I title company I clerk of the board of supervisors and the county recorder shall be affixed to the title sheet at least eight days prior to council consideration of the final map. The abstract of title certificate may be executed at any time prior to council consideration of the final map. The bond and agreement provided for in the preceding section shall be filed with the city clerk 1 I¿. ~f' ._,........._M._... ____ .~__._+ .-----....-..... ._"_..~--_..,._.._., --,---------" ._~__,.,"..._._____. .u_._~___·_· ..."-_.__.~_._- within sixty days from date of approval and acceptance of the final map. If compliance is not so had I then the council approval shall be automatically void and a final map must be resubmitted to the city council. B. The council shall approve said map if it is determined to be in conformity with the requirements of this chapter and the conditions of approval of the tentative map. If it is not in conformity I it shall be disapproved I and the council shall advise the subdivider of its disapproval and the reason or reasons therefor. The city council shall take action as provided herein within ten days or at its next meeting following the submittal of the report by the director of public works unless the time for taking action shall have been extended by mutual consent of the city council and the subdivider. Sec. 18.16.220 Construction prerequisites--Security arrangements--Genera11y. The subdivider shall file surety to guarantee completion of improvements with the improvement agreement as follows: A. Bonds. All bonds shall be executed by a surety company authorized to transact a surety business in California I and shall be approved as to form by the city Attorney I and shall include: 1. A faithful performance bond in an amount deemed sufficient by the Director of Public Works to cover up to fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of all required on-site and adjacent off-site improvements including twenty-five percent (25%) of grading and slope planting expenses as applicable. 2. A labor and material bond in a like amount. 3, A monumentation bond in an amount stipulated by the subdivider's engineer to cover the cost of placing lot corners and other related monuments. said èaßà oRall Be àrauß arui l:1:tilizcà. in e8Rformity Yn?ith ccction 11592 af the BusiRCÐO and rrafeoûioRû Code of tfie ctate af Califerßia.1 IThe Section of the Business and Professions Code referred to in this sentence has been repealed and replaced by new Sections of the Subdivision Map Act. The replacement language in Section 18.16.220.B.3., below, restates the relevant portions of the new Map Act Sections relating to cash deposits only. 2 /¿-~ _ ______.,______________.. .' __..'.'..__ _ __~.~.__~"_,_·u_____···_·'"" _~________ -".--... B, Cash Deposits. In lieu of the faithful performance and labor and material bonds I the subdivider may submit cash deposits under the conditions hereinafter described, Total cash deposit surety shall contain: 1. A faithful performance cash deposit in an amount deemed sufficient by the Director of Public Works to cover fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of all required on-site and adjacent off-site improvements including twenty-five percent (25%) of grading and slope planting expenses as applicable, 2. A labor and material beftè cash deposit in a like amount. 3, A monumentation ÐefIEi cash deposit in an amount stipulated by the subdivider's engineer to cover the cost of placing lot corners and other related monuments. Upon approval bv the citv Enqineer of the required monument settinq work, and upon subdivider's reauest. such cash deposit mav be released as payment directly to the enqineer or surveyor performinq such work. Caiã Èeßà BRall Èa àra\;n and u~ilizcà i8 eonfarmity ui~h ~ce~ien 11592 af the BuciflCS6 and Prefcaaisno Ceàe of the ctate of Califorßia. Disbursements from cash deposits shall be made in accordance with separate agreement between the subdivider and the city. A àee]tJtc.c."ißEj fee af eRe ~erCc.R't (1'5) af the t.etal ameu.Rt àepocit.eà ~w·it.h t.he eit.y for each cash ãepesit Èeßà The Reauired Bookkeepinq Feels) 2 shall be submitted with each such bond, Disbursements from a cash deposit filed with an approved escrow agency shall be made in accordance with separate agreement between the subdivider and the city. Disbursements from a cash deposit in any instance shall not be permitted unless and until authorized in writing by both the subdivider and the Director of Public Works. C. Instruments of Credit. In lieu of the faithful performance and labor and material bonds or cash deposits, the subdivider may submit instruments of credit under the conditions hereinafter described. Such instruments of credit shall be issued by a financial institution subject to regulation by the state or federal government in a form and content as approved by the city Attorney I and shall pledge that the funds necessary to 2 This change incorporates a change made in 1992 to other . sections of the Chapter which was inadvertently not changed here. 3 /¿, ~ ? _.__._---~--~---------~ meet the performance are on deposit and guaranteed for payment and agree that the funds designated by the instrument shall become trust funds for the purposes set forth in the instrument. An instrument of credit shall be accompanied by a current statement of assets and a resolution of the Board of Directors of the responsible organization authorizing the issuance and the amount of the letter. An instrument of credit shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth the date upon which the responsible organization was established. Instruments of credit shall provide surety as follows: 1. A faithful performance eash depesit instrument of credit in an amount deemed sufficient by the Director of Public Works to cover fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of all required on-site and adjacent off-site improvements including twenty- five percent (25%) of grading and slope planting expenses as applicable, 2. A labor and material Ðeftè instrument of credit in a like amount. 3. A monumentation Ðeftè instrument of credit in an amount stipulated by the subdivider's engineer to cover the cost of placing lot corners and other related monuments. E:aid sefid· shall se dra'\:R afld utiliøcà iß c6Rfermity \lith lS:eetioR 11592 of t.he BuaiRezD and rrefeøaieRs Cede af the ct~te af Califerflia. ~ Other. Subiect to the prior approval of city Council, in its sole discretion, in lieu of a surety bond, cash deposit or instrument of credit, alternative forms of security may be acceptable provided that: (1) in the determination of the city Enqineer. the costs of completinq the improvements beinq secured for a proiect do not exceed $5.000.000: (2) in the determination of the Finance Director. the proposed securitv is backed bv a quarantv and/or pledqed assets with a net value equal to at least 50 times the estimated cost of the improvements beinq secured: and (3) in the determination of the city Attornev. there exists adequate remedies to access such security in the event that the party obliqated to construct such improvements defaults on such obliqation, The form of such security and the terms and conditions upon which such security mav be accepted are subiect to the approval of the city Attornev and the city Enqineer. Such conditions shall include. at a minimum la) the riqht of the city to require that conventional replacement security be suþmitted for any uncompleted secured improvements at the time a certificate of occupancy is 4 /¿,-r --~._--------------- ----- issued for the proiect: and (b) developer's aareement to pav the citv's attornevs fees and costs if the citv must enforce its remedies under the alternative securitv arranaement. e;g. Endorsement of Certificates. The City Clerk and City Attorney shall not endorse or sign their respective certificates contained on the final map unless and until improvement security as hereinabove specified has been posted. Ð;E. Applicability to Parcel Maps. The ßeftà improvement security requirements stipulated above are applicable to any parcel map for which the installation of any public improvements or grading is a condition of approval. SECTION II: sections 18,16,230, 18.16.240 and 18.16,250 of Chapter 18,16 of the Chula vista Municipal Code are hereby deleted in their entirety:3 Gee. 18.16.2]9 a.BB~Fue~ieB pFeFe~uisi~es seeQri~y a~raBgeaeB~s Beø4s. All saRdo s}lall ee C1rcÐ\itcà ey a Ðurcty eom~aflY authorized to traRcne£ a ouret} S\iCifleSS ifl California, aaå ohall be apprs7eà as ~e ferm sy the oity attoraey, and chall iRel~à.c: A. ~ faithfal perfermaßÐc BeRd iR aft amouRt deemed Ðuffieient è~f the àircet:er af puelic ·...·er)ta te ea·yYcr u~ t.e fifty pcrecnt af the tata! aeet af all re~uircd eft cite aRà adjaocnt eff sit.e impre~:CH\CBt.Ð incl\iàing t\1ÐRt:f fi7e perccRt of §r:làißEj aRà. alsf)e plaJ\tißEj en:pcnOCEJ aD a¡3plieaele¡ B. A laèer aßà material eaßd iR a liJte ame1:u\t¡ c. A morn:J.mentatien sarui iB aB ameunt. Ðt.ipulat.cd S~f t.he ausài?idEr'a eB~inccr ta ea7er the eoa~ af plaeing la~ cerBera aBd other related meBumcBtc. £aid bOBà chall sa dratlB o.Be1 ut.ilized iB eaBfermit.}9 \y9ith Ecctisn 11S92 af t.he BuoiBecD and PrefessiaRD Cede af the ctûtc af CaliforBia. See. 18.16.219 GeBs~ruB~ieB prere~uisi~es SeBuri~y arraBgemeB~8 Gash .epeBi~8. 3~heÐe àelct.iens eliminat.e reelußàaRt. Cce~ießa af t.his Cha~t.er alrcaày act farth iR ~cÐtieß 18.16.220. 5 1¿'7 ------ -.---- --- -~~ ~ -.. ~------_.- 1a licH af t.he' fait.hfHI ~crfarJBaaee and labor aael material boaàs, the saÐdi?iàer may submi~ eash dcpesito uad7r t.he ee:Aài't.ieas herei:Aaft.er àcoeri13eà. Tet-al casR àCpOCl t carcty shall esntaia: A. L fai't.hfal ~erfermaaee cash elepesi~ i:A aft a~aun't. àe7mcd sufficient Jay t.he àireeter af puJalic ;.I\.·or]ts t.o co¡,;er flfty perccnt af thc.teta~ eec~ af all.rc~1:1i~eà an ci~c ~~el adjaceat eff 01 t..e lmlu:a9.~ementa J.ncl1:1dJ.:Afj' t\1ent.} fJ.. e perccnt af graà.ißg aaà. clapc plaat.inq t:1!f)cßcca as af)f)lieaèle. ø. A labor and mat.erial eaah elepaûit. in a li]te ûmouat.. C. A monamcatût.iaa oash àepeait. in aa amS1.iat. ctip1:1l~tcà BY t.he eßfJi:Accr af uar]t te ee9Jer t.he sect. af placJ.afj' lat. coracrs ûRà athe.r relateå mea1:Hl\CRt.a. Tht: aEjrccmcat. rc.lati vc. ta a each. dcpeci t. far meßti:B'lcnt.at.isn purpa~cø saall 19£ dra\:n and utili2leel in eaflformity ,:ita EcctJ.6a 11592 af the øuoiaess aßd rrefcsaisßB Cede. DiûbuYÐCmcnt-c tram cach dcpositc shall bc, ma~e., iR accorà.ancc \Ii th D6~aratc afj'rcc-mcß't bct,uecß the subd1"":J.àer aflà the eity. Tac ReEf1:iireà BooIrJreeIlifllJ Fec(iJ) sRall lee ûu19:m.ittcd \~·ith each ouah send. Diosurøemcnt-Ð trom a eaÐR dCf)eait. filcd ~·ith an appre7cd ceara\; aEjency Ðhall BC made. in aesard=tnec \lit.h eeparatc aEjreÐiReRt set\:cca the au19eli":iãer and 'thc eit.y. DioÐurBemeß~B from a each ã.cf)soit in an~f inct.aßee ahall not èe pcrmJ.ttcd ~n,leoD anã ußtil autherizeà iß ;Jritiß~ BY Bot.h ~hc SUBå171àer and the. dircst.ar of ,Helie uer]rs. Bee. 18.16.259 eeBs~~ue~ieB p~e~e,uisi~es B~eu~i~y arFaB,emeB~B IBÐ~FumeBts sf eFe41~ 11'1 lieu sf tRe faithful IIerformaflec aflà laesr a~à material Bands er cash depsøits, thc su~ài:ider may ,ÐubmJ.~ ino~ramcnto af credit uHàcr the eaßàJ.t.1eßc RercJ.n~fter de.saribeà. Lush inotrumcatø af eredit o~all Be iÐÐueà BY a fiaâncial iaøtit.ution subjce~ to rc§ulat.J.en by thc state or federal §a7erftmcnt iR a term and cORteRt as appra~ed by the city attoyacy, ~nà ahall ~leàEje ,that t.he tunds ßcct:ssary t.a meet the pcrfermaßec are en àef)eaJ.t and Ejuara~tccà for paj~eß~ and ãfJreC that t.he funåo dcsiEjnateà BY t.he J.aatrumt:n~ øhall bccamc truot funàø far thc purf)acea set farth J.~ the ißctramcn~. Aß inotrumcßt. af ereà.it shall Be accempaß1cà BY a eurrcnt ctat.cmcnt af aSÐetc and a r~Ðel~tieß of t.h~ ~oarà af diyeetorc of thc respansible erqaßJ.2IatJ.sn au~herJ.z1.ßEj the iÐÐuünee a:Aà. the ümeuRt af tht: lettcr. 14fl J..notY\:Hflcnt af creàit BRall lee aeesmpaflieà ley a iJtatcmcfl~ BCtt~fIlJ fortR thc 6 I~ -J d ~--^.- .-~--'~ à.at.e Upafl uhiah the reapeRoiÐle arfj'aRieat.iofl \las cctûÐlioheà.. IRstrumcRÊs sf ercàiÊ shall ~rsviàc aure~y as falle~s; A. A faithfal pcrfermaRec Ðarøty in aft amouRt àccmeà auffieie:Bt by tRe: direetar af p\iblie wer]ts ts co·;cr fift.~l ~ereeflt. sf ~he t.otal ees~ sf all eft sit.e aflà aàjaocat af! cite imprevcmeft~s, iaol\iàiftfj' t~eRty fi7e perccfl~ ef fj'raàiR~ aBà clops plaft~iß~ e]~eBSea as applicable; B. ^ laser and material s\irety in a li]t:e amouflt; c. A monumeflt.at.ion S\iret.y ifl aft ame\int st.ipulatcd by t.he ÐBEJinccr af ,.:erJt: ts ee"':er the east. sf plaeiBfj' lot. corflers aRà. ethcr related maRnmeRtc. ~\iÐft c\irety shall be àra~R aflà utilized in eaflfermity ·".:ith ~cctiaR 11592 af the B\isiReaC aflà. rrofcsaiaft6 Code. SECTION III: section 18,16,340 is hereby added to Chapter 18,16 of the Chula vista Municipal Code to read as follows: See, 18.16.340 Imcrovement Securitv Reauired Bv Reason of other than Subdivision of Land-- Acclicabilitv of this Chacter To the extent consistent with other aDDlicable Drovisions of this Code. and all other aDDlicable laws or reaulations, the standards for Derformance. security obliaations. and other reauirements set forth in this ChaDter with resDect to subdivision imDrovements shall also aDDI Y. under circumstances aDDroved bY the city Attornev and the city Enaineer, to anY and all other work or imDrovements constructed within the city reauirina comDletion auaranties in favor of the city. SECTION IV: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its second reading and adoption, Presented by Approved as to form by Chris Salomone I Director of community Development C:\or\1816 /¿-II 7 --~-^. ---_.~~---- -"~._---- -..+-.".-.-.." CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 17 Item Meeting Date 2/07/95 ITEM TITLE: Resolution ) 18'PXUthoriZing the Execution of a Subdivision and Precise Plan Improvement Agreement with Chula Vista Town Centre Associates, L.P., for the Purposes of Complying with the Requirements of Title 18 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, and the Precise Plan Resolution and Tentative Map Approval for the Channels ide Shopping Center Project SUBMITTED BY: C~muu;ty D~,lupm<n' W"" L > ' REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ 15J ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No.xJ ~ BACKGROUND: On November 15, 1994, the City Council adopted the Environmental Impact Report and approved the required discretionary land use approvals to allow for the construction of the Channels ide Shopping Center at the northwest quadrant of Fifth A venue and C Street within the boundaries of the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area. The Channelside Shopping Center is a 200,000 square foot shopping center which includes a 129,000 square foot "Wal-Mart" anchor store with another unspecified major 50,000 square foot store and additional smaller retail space. At the same November 15 meeting, the Redevelopment Agency Board adopted Agency Resolution 1431 which approved the "Precise Plan" and all of the conditions for the project. The Precise Plan conditions included all of the negotiated off-site and on-site public improvements necessary for the project and the respective timing for their installation. This agreement serves to formalize the timing and security required for the improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution which authorizes the execution of the Subdivision and Precise Plan Improvement Agreement ("Agreement") with Chula Vista Town Centre Associates, L.P. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The Municipal Code, Precise Plan Resolution and Tentative Map approval for the "Wal-Mart" project requires that before the Parcel Map is approved, the developer must either 1) complete all of the public improvements required as part of the project, or 2) enter into an agreement to ensure the performance of all required public improvement work within a specified period of time. This agreement meets the developers obligations as required under #2 above. I? -,) Page 2, Item 17 Meeting Date 2/07/95 The execution of this Agreement is necessary in connection with the Parcel Map for the project, and is in general conformance with other standard form subdivision improvement agreements including a list of the improvement$ necessary, their estimated cost, and a schedule of performance. This Agreement has been modified to the extent that it combines and distinguishes between conditions imposed as part of the Parcel Map ("Parcel Map Improvement Work") from those imposed as part of the Precise Plan ("Precise Plan Improvement Work"). Additionally, the Agreement allows for the acceptance of a Wal-Mart corporate guaranty as security for the public improvements in lieu of traditional forms of security as currently required under the City's Code. The City Attorney's office is preparing the necessary amendment to the Municipal Code to accommodate this form of security. Finally, the Agreement provides that the developer shall guarantee all public improvements for one (1) year from the acceptance of the improvements by the City, and indemnifies the City from any acts or omissions by the developer for a period of ten (10) years. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The developer is responsible for installing all public improvements at their sole cost. c:\commdev\lyle\113s\chside.113 / '1, ,;... -".._._'".._-_.,-_._.._-_..__._-_._--_._.__.._~---_....----- ---------------._--._~_._---_._-,_.__.,-- RESOLUTION NO. 178"(') i RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A SUBDIVISION AND PRECISE PLAN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CHULA VISTA TOWN CENTRE ASSOCIATES, L.P" FOR THE PURPOSES OF COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 18 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE PRECISE PLAN RESOLUTION AND TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL FOR THE CHANNELSIDE SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT WHEREAS, on November 15,1994, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista approved Resolution 1431 (the "Precise Plan Resolution") approving a Precise Plan application for approximately 31. 63 acres of land located at the terminus of north Fifth Avenue in the City of Chula Vista within the Town Centre II Redevelopment Project Area; and, WHEREAS, the developer is about to present to the City for approval and recordation, a final parcel map of the proposed subdivision pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and in compliance with Title 18 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, which parcel map will subdivide the land subject to the Precise Plan; and WHEREAS, the Precise Plan Resolution, the tentative map approval and the Code provide that before the parcel map is finally approved, the developer must have either: I) completed all of the public improvements necessary for the project, or 2) entered into an agreement with the City to ensure the performance of the public improvement work; and WHEREAS, the developer is willing, in consideration of the approval and recordation of the map, to enter into the Subdivision and Precise Plan Improvement Agreement wherein it is provided that the developer will install and complete at developer's own expense, all the public and private improvement work required by the City in accordance with the Precise Plan Resolution and the proposed subdivision; and, WHEREAS, a tentative parcel map of said subdivision has been approved subject to certain requirements and conditions as contained in a letter of Conditional Approval dated December 28, 1994. , NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA . VISTA does hereby rmd, order, determine and resolve to approve and authorize the execution of the Subdivision and Precise Plan Improvement Agreement with Chula Vista Town Centre Associates, L.P. in substantially the form presented with such minor modifications as may be approved by the City Attorney. PRESENTED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: ~~ Chris Salomone Bruce M. Boo aard Community Development Director 1 orney ak:lyle\resos\chside.res / 7'" .3 .---..~",...., ---.. - -- "-'--"""--'-~---~'--' -...- ~----~--"-'-'--'~" FEB-02-95 JIIU 12: 26 GRESHAI'I VARNER FAX NO, 909 888 2120 P,03/19 - RECORDING REQU~n:J) BY: CITY CLERK ,. I ...:' <~. \~, . , . WHEN RECORDBD. RBTURN TO: ·i ,\ ", . . ~ ~'~. , . -:.... ...... CITY OF CHUI.A VISTA t). 276 FourdI AVCIIIIC ChuIa VisIa. CA 91910 No traDsfer tax is due lIB this is a oon~ to a pubJic aaeø:y 01 Jess 1baD a fee iJII:erest for which DO ouh conaidc:ntion !w been paid or œœ.l.vecL .. -'M .' . .. . . n.-,,,:=?"'· tt:~?~~ t;.-,v \''''' ,...,...-:- (1" { ,:,,".., r ~, ,,- ___ _,.. ,..._ ,....y.. _-., r-' , - -, ~ ". .. ."." .. ; '" ... DeclaIaDt . ~ .__..... .............. u.. 0.1)01 }.. SUBDMSION AND PRBCISB PLAN IMPROVEMENT AGlŒRMHNT - THIS AGREEMENT (' A~') is made and entore4 iDto this day of .Tamiary. 199'.'1 and between THE CITY OP CHULA VISTA, a muDicipal corporation. hereinafter called "City', aJId CHULA VISTA TOWN CBNTBR ASSOCIATES. L.P., a Calli"umia. limirr.d ~, bereinaffcr ca1lcd ·SUbdivlder". RECß'ALS A. WHERBAS. ODor about November IS, 1994. the Redevelopment ~y of the City of ChuIa VISta ("ApDcy") IppI!Ovod R.ceoh1tiOI1 1431 (~ "l'm;i8e Plan Resolulion"), approving. Pn:clse Plan awl~rtQn for œnain real p¡oj)Cl1;y consiSting of approximately 31.63 aç~ of land located lit the ~;""R at North pifth AvCDIlC in tœ city at ChuIa VisIa. California Within the Town Ceatte 11 redevelopment p¡ojcâ area. and further Identified as Äss:s,sor'& Parcel Nos. 562-324-02 8Dd S62-324-04j md B, WIŒRBAS. SuWMðcr is ......wIIy ~~..'"8 with die city for approval and ~tI.on, a ØDal parcel map _ {"Patcel ~p~~! Vllik:h ~Parœ1 Map will subdivide the !aDd b' the Pøciae Plan; .œ . - . ," ! ,.... ..!- . IIU ~ec:t to " ,--.,. .. c. WHEREAS, a ~ pafccl' ÙIap Of aaicI subdivision has 1Icn;tofun: bcco approved. subjcâ to c:atIin ~ and conditions. is amtained in a letter of CODditional approval dated DcccmbC:r 28. 1994 ("Tearativc Map APProval"); 8Dd llM1:\GJ~t', _ 1 I?"J - ---_._.._~-_.__. .-...----.--..".--. ---,-. .._---------_._._----~------~-_.- F~~-U~-~~ .Inu 1"'0 \lIU:.,õ)nl1l.! Vr\N1C.I\ . .... U"', ___ --- ---~ D. WHEREAS, thç l'Ieçise Phm Resolution. the Tenlative Map Approval aDd the Chu1a Vista Mullicipal COde provide that bef~ said Parcel Map is fiDaIly approved by the City, SubdiVider 111WIt have either (i) iDstaJIc4 and completed all of the public jmprovements and/or land dcwlopmrat .worlt required by the Precise Plan Rm>lutioD, the Tentative Map Approval aød the Cb1¡1a Vista Municipal Code to be IDstaUed in SDbdivÏ$ions before final maps of subdiVisiOIUl are approved by the Council for purpose of rooonIinB in the Office of the CCAJnty &con1c:r of Sm D1cgQ County. or. ~ entered JDto an &FI""nt with City. II8CII1'ed by an approved hnptovemem sec:urity _ to . ÍD$I1nI the perforDlllJlco of said work puøuant to Ihc RqUimneDts or the Precise Plan Resol~tion. the Tentative Map Approval and the Chula Vista Municipal Code, apeeiIIg to Install aud complete, free of licJIs at Subdivider's OWIl C1.pemc:. all of the public IIDprovementS and/or land deVelopment work requircd in said subdivision within . dl-fln,'" perioc1 of time ¡nescribed by the City; 8Dd B. WHBREAS, Subdivideris wi1JiDg inçomldeIlltionoftbc approval and P:COIdatIon of said Pan:eI Map by the City. and in acconlaŒe with the Precise ~!m ResollJÛo!1 and the ,___ .,~ T.ñtative M/Ip Approval,tA cmcl-.mro.this AgrecDIênt Vfœ~ÎII it:isprovid¢:1hat SUbdivJdcr wID - ,. - , --, ,.,.' - . .....': '( ... ." '. . . ' .' . . - . , .. , - .- iD8taU and complete, at ~'11bdiVÏ/:k:r's own expense, an !be pUbhc ImpxovemeDI work requued by the City InllCC01'dancc with the P1'eçíse Plan RcIolution awl the pruposed &Ubd.1vision and wUl cIe1íver to City improvement securities as IþpMved by the City Attomcy; aDd F, WHEREAS. an estimaœ of the cost of CODStroCÛDg the public improvements aDd pri~ÏIIlprovancnta ~ to be coastrucU:d hc¡:t:by has been $I,bJ¡1itt..., and approved by the City in the ID101ID1 of Dollars aud -'- ($ ~- . ). - . . .. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS - - - NOW, T.HëREPORE.. his 1II1~,§lly understOOc1 ami agree4 as follows: 1. Sulxtivider, for Itself and tis succesSOl$ In intereSt, a¡rccs to comp]y with all of die tenns, eono';tioDS aDd requiIemettts of the Tentative Map Approval; to do and 1""Mm or ~ W be dvDe and pfum1ed, at itS own CXpen5C, without cost - to Ci1y, in a good and wntfnnAn1ike ....."""", 1IJIder !be direetion aDd 10 the satisfaction md approval of the City ~..g;-, all al1bc public Improvement aøtlor laud development wodt required to be done in aud Idjoining ,.ïd subdivision. II m~ particululy described 011 Exhibit "A", "....,.~ ~ aDd Inootporarcd heœ1n by reference ('Pmel Map Improvement Work"); aDd will fumisb the oecessaI)' materials therefor,' all in strict OODformity and in ~ with pJaus and specifications 1bcÍ:efor. Wbich plam and speclfil'.a~ODS sIIa1l be aPPl'Oved by the City Engineer prior to enno______ of 00DStt\ICtÍ0Ð of ~ Parcel Map ImpronmUlt WOIk. SubdivÏlll:;r'1 obligations puøn.'" to the prece"llng seQII:JWe shall be a burden which em:umbeIs and nms with the!aDd. Subdivider also agrees to dO and perform or Ç8USC to be done aud pc.rvnne<l, at ita ownexpeJJSe, 'I/ÏJbOUIC05t to CIty,In a good and w~""Ii1<e '''''''Mr. under the diœction and to the satisfaction and approval of th4 City EtJ;inecr, an the public Improvemcut and/or land cScvel~ wol'k œquIIed to be dOne puøIiaDt to the Precise Plan Resolution. as more particvbirly described 011 BKbibit "B ~, attached bor$to and ÙICO!pOl1Itc<I herein by mercø::c (-~ Plan lmp1OVe'Ð1ent WorJc") LtIIe Parcel Map Improvement Work and the Precise Plan Improvement Work may be collectively refezmi to herein as ~ "Jmprow.mont Work1; IIIId will furnish die 11« US1T}' 1JI1I".,"-I~ tbérefor, all in strlct ccmfonnity and in accordance with plans aud JOOO:~ . 2 , /7·¿· - - ___._.~_"_.,,__,_._...__..__"_" ,_______ ~,...__ 0" __ ___.",_,,~___,_.".______.___.._ -----. -..--.-.....------ -~ II.oU ....'" ......, ....... .....-_. ------ specifications therefor, which plans and specifications sball œ approved by the City Engineer prior to .........m....l'~ of construction of soch Precise Plan ImprovC!l1eI1t WoIk. NotWitbs""vll"$ !he 1bø:gotDg, SUbdiVider may commence construction of any portion of such lmpIOvement Work for which plam Çd specifications have bœn appro~ aDd any œquJred pamit5 Jæued. iI. ~ açtnowled,ged and agreed by City that plans and RpeclficatioDs for the whø1e of the ImpIOvement Work need IIOt be approved prior to com"" ~Dt of constrUCtion of any portion of'thc Improvement Work for which plans and specifications have been approvecl. 2. It Is expICSsly understood and 82ICCd that all moIlllll1l!l'lfS have been or will be installed witbin thirty (30) days after the comp1etian Çd aeœptancc of die Improvement W011t, an<1 that Subdivider haS insta1lcd or will instan ternpQIaIY street name sip prior to City's ac::œptançe of tho lmpJvYcò1cDt WOtk if pernuo........ street name sips have not been Installed. 3. It is expressly UDd~.~ aDd apmi that Subdivider wiJ1 cause all necessary materials to œ furnisbed and all Improvement Wo¡k zecvñred 1JDder the provisions of this r,.,:,_ ',~ ~ to.bc.clcmc 011 or;.~ ~ .d¡I',.s SCI. forlh un t\~e,((SçJi.Odu1ej _iICd heieto "i " , . ". as Exhibit ·C"; attacl1ccl bcIcl:o andinc:arpoøtœ herein 'Y œfcre:nce.· . 4_ It is understood and agrœd that, except II set forth below. Subdivider will pcIform II&Ïd IJ¡¡¡mM:mcm Wod: BllIiCL COItb hereinabove, or lbat ponl.on of said Improvement W orlc serving any bulldiDgs or structures reIIcIy for OCCúpancy in 8IIÏ<I subdivision. prior to the is~ of any ccrtifjçaœ of ~for ulility CODDCCtIoDS for said bllIdtngs or sttuctures In said subdivision. and such certificate shall not be îssued UDtil the City Engineer has certified in writing the completion of &aid public improvementS or the portion thereof sc:rvin¡ said building or struct1µeS a¡ipIOved by the City; lI1'9vided, bowever, that the improvement security shall not be iequiIed IU COvei' the provlñons of this paragraph. 4,1. If Subdivider proposes to request City use eminent CIOma.in p~mgs to acquire the off~site rigJrt.J\f-way ðesçribed in CoDclition :8.9.8. to the Pm:iac Plan Resolution, Subdivider sbal1 provide to City wriueo. evidcute tbat an offer to purchase based upon the appraisal of an iDdepeDdent appraiser Jw been ID8de and rejected or not rcspoDdod to by the owners re<JUired to exec:uœ a grant of street easement. Jf ~'ubdividcr is uuable to acquire the off-me righkñ-way tbrOIIgh usiDg the meaD5 describCcI above, upon Subdivider's wriLk::n IeqUeSt, City sha1l scbedDle aDd deliberate upon the acquisition of the off-!lite rieht-of-way by the exercise of ita powcI' of elDÙ!*Dt c1ømaJn. Notwiths"""il1t the forcBOiDg. <a) CIty sbaU not be obligated to exercise its ~w.nt40maln authOrity except as it deems con.~i8tent with the ~nts of Þ Jaw; aJJd (b) City sbaI1 rt!aÏn Q full aDd ~mt cIiacrction to ßjcct the use of .....,""", domain forIII}' and all reasous, Subdivider wiD exercise diligent, good faith effolU to ac:quh'e such off-site right-of-way. 4.2. (a> If Subdivider maba IUd1 oft'Ct' and such offer is rejccled or not œspond~ to fOr a pcÌiod of tbirty (30) days and Subdivider tbereafter requests in writiug that City oonsider ecquismcm of tile ., In'..,. olf-aitc l"~ cIcaçrlbçd in CoDclition B.9... 1D 1!Ie PreCise Plan RcsolutioD..lb1:ouih tbe exercise of its .....m- don1ain powm, tbeI1 the Subdivider (I) shall, within thirty (30) days of meking soch m¡uest, pott with the City ~ty In . fom acceptable 1D the City EÐ¡Ineer and the City AttonIC)' in the amOlijrt of 550,000 tn cover legal and other QOSts ùx:urred by the City in acquiriDg the ptopaty cIcIcribed in Con<lmon B.9... to the Precise Plan Resolution tbrOugh the exercise of its eminent MmAln powers; and (ii) sbaJ1 JIIIO,~ 3 , 17-) - ^-"_.._-_.-._.._~--"--"-~-'- ,-,--------...-..-. .---.' ---_...~....._--_...._._.._._,........ .._---_.__._.-.---~..,-~-"---.-.-- .--- rc~-U¿-~~ .Inu I~'~O uru:.'¡;¡UI1U 1'ua.u....u. . --- .-_. - prior to Of c:oucomntly with appliçation by die City for an OIlIer for Tmm!".ftlare Possession deposit with the City cash or ~ setUri1y acccptaJ\le to the Court in an amount oqual to the City &siœer's good ~rh estimatcof one bundrcd fifty pm;ent (ISO") of the cllieçt cost of acquisition of the propert;y described Ù1 Condition B.9.a. to the PrecIse Plan Resolution (inclusive of appraiaa1 costa). No~ die fOICgUing, except for die amO\Ul1 in clause (I) abOve (wJüch amount represents Subdivider's mOT\1I).\IIIIIiability), Subdivider sbal1 remain . AGSpOD$ibJc for aJIlII,;tua1 diIeçt coslS. iø;urmI by the CIty tn CODDect:ion with the acquisition described in clause (II) above áD4 an actnal direct and inditeçt coets iDcurrœ by tIw City in . CO!IDCCtÎon with the constrIJçtÌon of thclmprovemcnt Work described in Conditions B.9.a. and ).9.b. of the Precise Plan Resolution. The city shall meet and com.r m good faith with Subdivider, ¡çgardins the tel'lllS of any potendal seutement of any em.incm domain action or of any vo1untaty ìcquisition of such propmy by the City, prior to entering into any such seu:1cmeDt or volUJJÞ.ry atqUls1tI.on. SUbject to such obligation to meet an4 confer. City sha1l bave dis:etetion to enter imo any snch tett1ement or vobmfary acquiSition (·Settl~·) provided that the Ci1y. ðoes DOt pay 1IlOIC. than oœ bUndred thirty percent (130") of fajr market value (as ___. .,~.~1;IDiœc1 ~ an appraiJal.~for tbe City by ~.~, ~GÇted·bY the, City for~' . , . pmposc of acquisition of such property) for ttJc property 50 aCquired without Suhdlv\det'S pnor approval. which approval sbaU not be unreasonably withhold or delayed. In the cvwt that the City curers into any such Scttlemell1, and subject to t1Ie limitations set forth in the pteeedÍIIg seDteDc:e, Subdivider shaU deposit with the City cash or other ;"'m...(Ii~""1y available fands in an ~um equal. to the City's ~ cost of the acquisition of the prope.ty (inc1usivc of appraisal costs), within the dmcpcrioc1 œqtùrcd by the Setd~ for City to pay the pun;hase price to theowner(s) oftbe pro~. .' < . (b) . If sucb ptope¡ty (orposses.~on thereof) is acquired within six (6) mootbs from t:hë posting of the security described in çlause (i) of Scc:tion 4,2(a) llbove, suçJ1 security and the security post$i by Subdivider for the. con.~n of the portion of the ImprovemeDt Work lotaled on iIuI:h property shall remain in place Wl1i1 cODStnJCtl.on by SUbCliVidcr of the improvemews described in Condition B.9.b. to the Prec:ise Plan Resolution, ecceptaDI:C . of ~ch improvcmcub by City and ICJ?1aCCJDCl) of such security with m~lnr('n~nN! security in accordm.:e with City'¡ srandard requb:I!:IIiI/""f·. Upon acquisition of IUCh property. all cash dcposiledwilh the City and not expeDded by the Ci~y in colll1CCt1on with the aa¡ulsition of auçh þiopecty sbal1 be p<fi,rWiI tD Subdivider. (c) If posSI"~'ÍOP of such pIoputy is not obtained within six (6) months from the pœting of II1Ch cash and/or security, (I) suçJ1 security and the security posted by Subdivider for the const:NCtion of the portion of the Improvement Work loc:ated on such pIoperty aha11 mnaiD in p]ecc aøllhtrcafta SUbdivider sbal1 baVC no further obligation regard!ns the acquisition of such ~~; and (ii) Subdivider shall bave the right, but not the obligation. to substitute, for any and all cash ¡miviouslY 4epOSÏttd wi1h the City, eeanitY in a fom IUIIOnably acceptable to the City A.ttomcy.' In that event, at the City's request. Subdivider and City sball meet aD! confct inßood faith for an additional period of four (4) 1110ÐtlIS in OMer to a!teII\pt to agree upon 1lUi1ab1e tepJøl'Þm~t mitigation .~~ for the tmfiç Împ¡œ1S FJ!CIúed by the project. im;1uùIIJg tile project's pro rata share or cumulative ttafßc ~acts, It the City aud the Subdivider ape upon zepIacement mitiption :measures requiriDg die ~on of off-site rigbt-of-way. au.l the City does not obtain possession of such off-site right-of-way within six (6) mœtbs of such apm-. the COIIItruction of snch teplacement mitigation measuteS sbaII be waiwd as a condition to the City's issuance of CertifICateS of JM:\G11DØ1Ø'- .. OD5' 4 . //..y ----~_..._.- _____u____·_··· -------~_.._..__.,_._-_..__.,- .- -- -.. ....- -- -- 0cc:upaIIC)' with rc&pCCt to furIbc£ development (after 1sS\WXC of the Wal-Mart Store Certificate [as oeflOCd in Section 9 be10wD ottbe project, However, in ihe event that the partie¡ arc uœble to 8~ upon liUilable tcpJacemem mitigation 1JItP$UrC$ during this four (4) mcmth period, ('.ondítioDS B.!>,a. and B.!>.b. to the Pøcisc Plan Rt:&oIUtion, Iba11 be waived 8$ Ii condition to . aœCity'5 Ï8S'1~"'~ of CeIt111cares Of OCcupancy With respect to !urtbtr development (after isSuance of the Wal-Mart Store Certificate) oftbeprojcçt; but SlWdividcr's secwi1y Iball remain 10 plaçc: for all adclitloual two (2) years to be Iltlli7.e< by City for ~ of compJetù!g (A) the ori¡inaJly couremplated ~itiOD. aod improvemon18 (to the extent suål aa¡uWtiOD and tmprovemeøs latcr become feasiblc), or (B) such other tIaffic mitigsuion measures as are agreed 'UpOD by Subdivider and City after meetiDg aDd coDfen'Úl$ 8$ provûied above or devúsecl by the City If SUbdivider and City are unable to agree as to suitable traffic mitigation ml'~p1o:es. If the City .devises and colJ5lrUCts mitiption mrIIS1tte1 DOt a¡reed W by SUbd1vider, d1en (A) SUbdJviaer's obligations reiated to CODStrUCIion of such mitigation me,ct1"C$ and/or the açquisition of right-of-way thcJcfor sba1l Ix: limited to the Ii¡b1 of \be City to draw dOwn on the $CCUrity posted by Subdivider. for ~ of acquisition of propertY and ~cti9n of r-- _ _~ ~~tioo 1I1~S, (B) S1J~.n have no ~r ~ligalÍUn rc:ardtDg such acquisition" ,'.~. . .. and construction and (C) in no event .,n City drawn down more than ODe huDdreci perceDt (100%) of the actual cost of such acquisition and çonstruction. Further, City will not drawn down on the security posted by Subdivider except for !be pu¡poseof mitigating traffic ;""P1ets idœtific:d in. the Envhu~ Impact Rcpun fOI tile project or as otherWise required by subsequent traffic lIIlIdie$ (to ideD1ify aDd ft1~te traffic impacts created by the project) to the cxtènt the I>IR bcc:omcs ontdatcd and ob50lelC. . ., ~. : (d) If the developer of1bc NatiOJlål City MarlœtplaCC project postS C8Sh~or securiIy satisfactory tot:he City for its pro rata dwe of t:hecost of such plCtt""'ty acqu1$ition aø:I impIIM:ments, the cash and/or security postea by Subdivider sba1l be rcdutœ proporti.oDate1. If the developer of the NatioJJa! City Markerplaoø· project doea DOt post cash and/or st:eurity for Its pro rata share of tbe cost of such property acquisition and improvements. City øhall coope¡:atein good faith with Subdivider in implementing a rdmburaclU.cDt program whereby Subdivider will be n:1mbursed by any fuWIe developer or developers of projects benefitted by such p1~ acquîsition and improvements, including any MUle developer of tbç Natioual City MarlœqlIace project, In an IJDOUtlt cquallO the pro rata sbatc (of the cost of IlUCb property acquisition and improv~.) of National City Marlœtplace, as IUch pro rata share is detI:m1InC4 p\Jl"I1~"r to a fair share analysis by an indepe1Ident 1Iaffic qInecr approved by the City J:'.I\gÍ..-.... , (e) In tbD eveDtof Q cOnfIjçt bctwcçn the tamJ and conditions of dûs Scçtion 4.2 and tbe PICdsc Plan Resolution. this Section 4.2 sbal1 control; however, aU DOn- conflicting provisions of the Precise Plan Resolution &ball remain in fu1l force and offcçt. , .... s. It is expressly 1mdenItood and agreed to by Subdivider that, in the perfOIJllaIlCC of saldImprovement WorJç, SUbdivider will CODform to 8Dd. Ibide by all of the provisioDs of tbD ordi"~"""", of the: City, and tbD Jaw. of the State of Califomia applicable to said work.. 6. Subdivide: further agrèoa to fumiah aDd dclivor to the City, 'ÍID\1ItaDCOII81 with the execution of tbis Agreement. an approved improvement security frœn a sufficient surely, whose sufficiency bas been approved by the City in !be SUID of Dollars I ($ ) (7St, of the estimate set forth -- .aO\O:tGlfII.NmJ"Ia 'al~ m'Ii S /7--9 -- --------~--- .,.,,----------.. ---......,--.-.-- -..---.'" - ---"._._''"--_.__._.._~"_._.-._---- .- ....... -"'-...... .- -- -------- m 1lccita1 Ii above), which security shall guarantee the faithful peñormance of this contract by SUbdivider ~ is attached 1Iereto, DWked Bxbibit "D" BDdmade a part hereof. Upon !be "pplol'41 by the City 'F~ or the plans and specifications for the Improvement Work, sucb impmvemeDt secnrity aha11 be zeduceð ftom the sum of Dullars _,_(S ) w a sum equal to 50% of the estimate for the cost of such work as estimated by the CifyR.,gj- after approval of sueh plans m:I ~ifu;atiOllS, ,. Sub4ivider furtber apes to funlish aDd ckJiv« to tbc City, sûnultaucously with die eXCCU1lon of 1!IIs A¡rcement, an approved improvement security from a sufficient SU1'ety, wbu.e sufficìeocy has been approved 1Iy tile City in the sum of Dollars --1_ ($ ) (75'1£ oftbe t$'';m"re set forth m ·lteciÞl B above). to secUte the payment of materia! and labor in counectioD w1th tile f"""'11"flnq of saki pubUC ImprovemeIUS, which security is attached beœto, marked ExIu.'bit "E" Ød ~ a put horeof. Upon the apptovaI by tbc City ~'1C¡neer of the plans and spec1t1cat1ons 1br the Jmprovcmeu1 work, such imProvemellt security wIl be reduced &om the sum of r"' .,~ -. -... .. . ..._..,.Do~.,.--'_ ($ -", w,) ÎÖ .amï-cq¡Íal to ~" of the .. . .' ~t'" for tile cost of such work as èïtim.1Pit by the City Rngj......r a.fœr approval of such plans aÐd sper.¡fLo...tiODS. 8. Sllbdivider furtbcr ap:cs to furnish m:I deliver·to!be CIty , slmu1taDcoDSly with tbe.øec:ution of this Agræment. an approved improvement eeœrity in the sum of . - Dollan ..J _ ($ . ), to secure tile in.et"n"tion of JIIDIIUIIIeIÚS. which ..........11)' Is .-,.,,"'" hereto, marked Exhibit -F" aDd made a part bDrcof. 9_ . . The ....tÞ comemp1ate that, in cosmec:tiOI1 with !be grading of the property lRIbject to the: PRcl$c Plan, Subdivider shall furnish and deliver to the City an approved improvemem~rîty to secure the perfonnaøce of such gradiDg, which security may be in the loon of IIJl guaraDIy f'rom Wal-Man StoleS, loc., 111 a fOlm SUbSb"n"ny similar to Exhibit "D" , ~ .hereto_ . - ~ 10. NotWit"-,,,n!Jg any provWon of this Agreement to the contrary, upon iasuançe by the City of a œnIfI.œte tor cJearante for utility coDDectioos or occupancy wilh respect to tI1e Wal-~ store b>¡;/db¡g (a 'Wal-Mart S10Ie Certificate"), in !he event that any portion of the Improvemeul. WOIk has IIOt been complete<1 and. accepted by the City at such time. City, in its sole discretion, may require that Sub4ivicler øp1aQe any and an Wal-Mart guaranties seauiDg die c:ompledon of stich Improvement "'OJ.'!( with alternative seœ1ty in Ihe folm of surety hond.~ In IICCCIrdaDI:e with CImla Vista Mmñ. CocJ. Section 18.16.Z20.A. At. Subdivider's c1cçtio.ll, rq>Iaœmcm security In the folm of cash deposits or letteJS of CIedit. in accoxdaœe with ChuIa. VISta MIJDI~1 Code SecdODS 18.16.220.9 and C, awpeçtivcly, sbaI1 also be acceptable. Under DO cIrcumstaJçeS sbaU the repla<:e1""'nt of.such WaI-~ be a condition of the ise-- of tile WaJ-Mart S10Ie CertiticatD. . . - 4Ù.!.:. It is Mtber ape4 that iftbe Improvemont Work is not completed within the time aped he1dn. die S1ØDI provided by said improvement securities neteSS8!:y to cnmp1ete the Jmp¡ovement Wo!k may be use4 by City for the completion of the Improvcmcot WOIk in aççord¡mce with suçJ1speç1ftcatioos herein ÇOJi"'¡""4 or løfeued. or at tI1e option of the City, as aie appIO'\'e4 by the. City CouDcU at tbe time of CUPPs the work to be performed. Upon CCIIiIi"",1nn ofcompledon by die City EDgincer and acceptance of the Improvement Work by JØO.:4GI~" ...,.,.··.œJ . 6 /7-/1' - _ _ ___~.·"n.______~ _ _'~.~__.__.__~_ - - ---- -"'-"'-~----_.~--'---" r~D-U~-~~ .Inv 1~·¥1 \.U~""IU"I .....~...... j City, aIIIi aftèr eertifIcation by the City'. Director of PÙIBI¥:C ¡bat all costs of Cbe Improvement Work are fully paid, the whole amount of aU impro~CIJ]eDt sec:urities, or :my part thereof not ¡equired for paymeut for the completion of åUy Improvcmem Wotk, shall be releued to Subc1I.V\der or its au~sors in iJ]t.ere8t, pursuam to the Iim:øs of the improvement sccuritics. Subdivider a~ to pay to th~ City any di.ffèmICC between the total COsts IDct1rred to perform the Improvement Work. iDctudiDgde5ign and p'¡mm¡~tion of constnJetÍon (inçluding a n_~hle allocation of ~d), amf any p.l'OQ:Cds from tile improvement securities. ~ It is also cxpte5Sly aped and understood by the 'Parties bmIo that in no case wiD the City, or any departmeøt, board or officer thereof, be 1iab1e for any portion of the I:OS1s and expenses of the Improvemeut Wort. ~ It is Curtœr UDdcrstood and agreed by !be parties Jlereto that SUbdivider shan pay (i) any ~ costs (including plan çbe(.";" mOnl''''....'''tion çbcekiÐg. inspc:çtion. matcr1als furnlsbed and ·0Ibcr l1IcideDla1 c¡penses) IDcu1Ted by Çity in ronnection with the r," ..~ app~ya1 ,of the lmproy~.V{.ort.~ and iDsta11~~e 1mpi:o'VC~nt Work, imd (ll) the· : . ", ëost óf street signs aIIIi street trees as may be xequired Y Çity and approved by the City Euginecr. Subdivider shall dc:posit with City, prior to recordation of the tiDal Patcel Map, a sum of money sufticient to cover the foregoing costs. . Al!:.... It Is .\ItIIe[StIJOd and a¡reed. that until .such time as all Improvement Work ~ public: impl'OVfll11ents is fully c:ompletod and 8CCOpted by City, SvWMdcr will be œs¡)ousible for the mai~ of. and the repair of any damage to, the streets, alleys. easements. water aDd sewer liDca within the proposed subdivision. It is furthl:r understoOd and agreed that Subdivider sbaU ¡uuantee aU public improve¡nt".l'1t~ for a period of oœ year from date of final ac:ccptaIICC and com:ct any and all defeCts or ddicieDcie$ arlsiDg durIDg said period as a result of the acts or omiSsion of Subdivider. its agents or employees in the performance of this A~nt. Upon ac:c:eptance of the ImprovœleJ1t Work by City. SUbd1v111er sbaU ¡rant to City, by appropriate conveyance, tile . public i~ constructed p1l1'lUGlt to tbit Agreement; provided, however, that said acceptauœ aball not cxmstitutea waiver of dcfcx:t5 by City as set forth hereinabove. NotwidL<lWUiing any provision hereof to the contrary, City acImoWkdgcs aud apes that the bridge coQJ1CÇlTng the property subjecl to tile Parcel Map to Broadway A~ andlor National Avenue is currentlv intended tD be a private, not II public: improvement, IUId aball DOt be dcð.icated or od1cIwiIie convcye4 to !be City exceøt with tile mutual consent of the City and Subdi\1Ïder- It is further acknowledged aJ!d agIMd that those portions of the lmprovemœt WoIlc IQÇated wilhin the propc:ny adjacent to 1be ¡hope. t, subject to the Parcel Map, and cutrently owned by DixieliDe Lumber Company, IDe, (the "4th Avenue ~ Improw:meDt$"). am: not cumntly bttendcd to be pub~ improvements, aIthou¡h City may dctennine that it desires I ri$ht of way over and &ClOSS tile 4th A vexmc Ac:cess 1JnprovemcJ1lS, aœ in ~1ICh evcDt. 1!Ic SUbdivider sbaU dedicate and convey or cause to be dedicated and cœ=yed to the City auçh interest in the 4th Aveœe Access ImprovementS as tlK: City ICaJODabIy dcmcs to providcpub1ic aca:ss from 4d1 AVeDUC to Subc1ividcr's project. ~ It ø IIDC1crstood and ap:ed that City, as 1Dd~r.ec, or 8IIY omccr or emplOyee . , . I not be liable for any inþny to person or property oc:casionod by reason of the acts or omissions of Subdivider. its asent8.or employees, or iDð.....I'I;œc. in tile perfC)Tl'l1RI1œ of its obligations under this Agreement. Subdivider fIIrther agrees to protðct aud hold the City, its officm aDd cmp1oyc:es, hæ:mless from aø;y and an claims. (......nds. causes of action. liability , 1OD:\clt1N11tNJ'..· . R" . 7 17~1/ - -.--.--.--...... -----.-.-"'..-,'.--------- .- ------- '._,' ._._---_._-,---_._--~---_.,---,._. FEB-D2-95.THU 12:32 GIü:::>tlf\l1 Vt\Kl'll:.K f"nt\ ¡'v. w,,",'" """"... ........- or toss of L, 1Ort, because of or arisillg out uf 8ctB or omissions of SubdIvider. its a¡ems or employees. or itW.mnitœ. in the pcrfonnance of its oblipöons under tbB Agreement; provided, however. that the approved fmprovemtn1 ~urity shallllOt be required to cover the provision.~ of tills pan¡raph~ Subject tn rb:: limiting eonditiollS set fortl1 in the Precise Plan &soJution, such ind<;mnititation IJId agRItmCD1 to hold harm1eSS shall extend to dama¡es to adjacent or downstream propertiel: or the tJkjn¡ of property &om OWllm of such adjaçcm or downsttcam propc>rtics as a IC8U1t of the COIISIlW.."tion of said subdivision and the public improvements as provided hcfein. It IIhalJ also exteDd to daIJ1aSe$ resultiDg from cIivetsÏon of waters, dLaDgç in the vol1uDe or fI9W. modif'u:ation of be ve{ocity of the water. erosion or .ntation. or the mocI~ of the point of d¡""h"~ei as thcresult of the eonstruction enc1 ...."i........,,~ of dtaiJJagc 1i)/5te:mS. 'IbC approval at plans providing for any or all of these conditions shall DOt constitute the uswnption by City of any RSpODSibi1ity for 5UCh cIamage or taking, DOl slJa1l City, by said approval. be an insurer or ~ for the constrUCtion of the subdivision pursoaDt to said approvccl improveD1eDt plaDs. Tb6 FOvwons of this ¡ìU'ag1'aph shall become; dRçtjve upon !he eJtcanlon of1bis A¡¡:ccmcnt and sbalI remain in full force and effect for ten (10) years foUowing !'-~~;.!b"~by the C;¡'iY:pf~~VciJo""'h, F~X Y'\ ?C~ ~1·.r·7··'· . r ~'''r : .' _ .~ _ _. J. ~ Subdivider ~ to dcfCDd. Ind_nify, and hold harmlcss the City or iœ agentS, otncers, 8IIC1 employees rroxn any claim, action. or pmceediTIg against the City or its agents. officers, or employees to attack, let uidt, void, or annul, an approval or tb: City, advisory agepcy. appeal board. or legislative body cooceming a subdivision. which âon is bl'Ollght within tbø 1ime periocl provided for in Scction.66499.37 of the Oovc£D!1lCIlL Code of the Sœœ of Califomia. , '1Vl:- PursuaD1 to Resolution No. 2.4-94 of the p¡"nn;ng Cnm.m·don of tile City of Nalional City, City has certain approval rights teganIiDg tb: projcct proposed by Nu-Westcm Development Co. aDd common1y Jœ.own as NatioJIat City Marketplace ("Natioual City Mac1œtp1aœ") located adjaœD1 to Subdivider's projc:cL Subject to SL1CII investigations, public bearings. finðl"fS and other procedur1!A u ate xequited by California law au4 City's œ-!in·-ts and \1$UAl~, and as subject to all required findings of City after approprlatt inveStIgation and public hcariDes. City agrees tn. exercise its approval rights coucemins National City Marketplace in a manIItr which accommodates the completion of the Improvement 'WOIk and thedtvelopment of Subdivider's project. City asrees to.coopeme in good faith to C8IISC the City of National City to approve 11I1 p1aDs au41ssUe any peDDlts requJrcd to be approved or issued by the City of Notl",,"' City JleCeo~'Y to allow tho COJIStrUÇtÌon of the Improvement Work. A..!!:.J !W:qJt as expressly set forth herein to the eontralY, tile terms and conditions of this ~ are subject to die tenDS and conditioll8 of the Precise Plan Rcaolutioo. IJId the Tentative Map Approval, and, in die event of a confUct betWeen the terms and CODditiODS of the Precise Plan h1nTntw. and/or the Tentative Map Approval, and this Agreement, tile tenDS 8Dd œlllÜtÍam of !he PIrx:ùe .Plan Resolution and the Teuw1ve Map ApproVal sba!1 CODt1'Ot. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. tile parties JJcmo !lave executeð this Agreement on the date set tonh above. . [SIGNATURES FOlLOW] JO\O:\01JOØN1'&.. - _. 8 /7.. /.,l. -----_._,,---_.._._~._.. ~~Ö-U¿-~~.lnU l~·aa U1\.1:.wunu .UI~u..n. . .-. --- ·City· THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a DIIDlicipal c:orpom1ion Mayor of tile City Chula Vista Attest: , City Clerk . .- - ,'" ...........' ,.,__ ...'"'~... '~.._~1.'. -" _.: ,..~.t'.:' .- - _..... Ai'· -. .'" "." -- .. . ":"'~"7',_"1':'_.~- '-"'J" ~.,."'-' .~....?:'".!.y. ':!".?y-:"'. ï:'f\',f \,,.... "'.......~!. r ':' ~ "I ~ , /". ~ Approved as to form by: - City AttOrneY -.......- -- (SIGNATURES CONTINUE) -.- - --- - .- .0000'Ql~1~ laos . I')..):) - .. _....._~_._~ -...------ -'-- .. _._-,--~~---- rc.o-Uc.-Da . UIU &LO vv _"~I~". .._____ - "Subdivider" CIula Vista Town Center AssocÌllte$. LP.. a Califomia Hmited partDCIShip By: OIula Vista Town Center A.ssoc1aœs, 1nc., a California corporation Its: General PutDer "- By: Its: ~ ....;; -~... . - ... --- -" a_·... . -.,.;...........- ,.¡_~._;..........: w..-'.: ;.·1..... ... _-..II 'Ø" .. - _~. ~;~ ...... roo·~,·· ....."... "~-'~"":1~:· ,.~'/S.'\~~. F~\( ~" ~..; fJ'r ø;_..... ~ "'"i'''' --"T_.T. " .". . . A' -~ ".'" - 1GD:GIJiCNØN.·· .. - NW. , 17,1'1 .. - - n_._._....._..__.,,______ _. _._~,....._______._ ._._______n__.__ ------ r~ö-U'-~O.lnu 1~·~~ \In.c.ùnru! Vru\JU.l~ . .-. ".-. - - - - STATB OF CALlPORNIA ) : 55. COUNTY OF ) On . 19 . before me, , persoully - - appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons wboœ III1I1eS are subscribed to the within ÎDSt:rument, aDd acbowledgcd to me tbat tlJCY e&ecuted the SIIII1C in Tbelr authorized çapaclties, and that by their signatures on the instrument the petSODS, or the eDtity upon behalf of wbich the pcrsoos acted, C)I'......- the ÏDstI1UJIeDt. WITNESS my baŒl amd official seal. - ~--. . . ~. .. .. _..... ... î-:-~:7-'."'~ -1 : ').' ~:-.~a...~~~ '/:'~~~:::-- FI~\{ ~~t. 7".., ?r f ~ :; . ~.,...... . . . Notary Public in and for Ai4 CouDI:y and State '¡' .- , . --" ." ..". --' STATB Of CALIFORNIA )--- : IS.. COUNTY OF ) On _,19_, beforcme, . persooa1ly appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidente) to be the per5OII$ whose III\IIJeS are subscn'beð to the within iDstJ:umcnt, aDd IIdaIowlcdgcd to me that they exeçulCd tbI: same ID their alldIorIzcd capac1ties, and tbat by their &1BT"''''res on the inmumeut the peISODS, or the entity upon behalf of which the penOIl$ acœcJ, eJIV'·tecI the ~. ---. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said Co\mt}' IIJId State iCIW:\ollQ1Ø'J01¡M]..,.a." . /7-/.5' --_..~.,--,.~...--._.- - .-- "--_._._-~~-_._--~...__._--~-- EXHIBIT A Parcel Map Improvements 1. Construct street improvements on N. Fifth Avenue as required by the tentative Parcel Map. 2. Construct street improvements on Broadway as required by the tentative Parcel Map. ) 7")¿' _.~_._.. __ - __..__ u_ ,,______n______________ ____._ EXHIBIT B . SubdivIsion and Precise Plan Improvements 1. Install a traffic signal at N. Fifth Avenue and C Street and rest ripe C Street. 2. Install "No Parking" signs on N. Fifth Avenue, between C Street and its northerly terminus. 3. Remove existing striping and restripe N. Fifth Avenue north of C Street to provide two southbound lanes, a continuous left turn lane and a northbound lane. 4. Install a painted .or raised median on N. Fifth Avenue north of C Street to provide a shelter for trucks exiting from the most northerly GES driveway. 5. Provide an interim driveway with one lane of traffic out and one lane of traffic in, northerly of Brisbane at the existing driveway to Dixieline's back lot. 6. Construct a temporary access road between the project and N. Fourth Avenue which shall be aligned with the interim driveway. 7. Modify the traffic signal at Broadway (National City Boulevard) and 35th Street to provide signal phasing for the new east leg connection. 8. Construct an access road, including a bridge crossing, between the project and the intersection of Broadway (National City Boulevard) and 35th Street to the satisfaction. 9. Remove existing striping on Broadway between the SR 54 bridge crossing and a point approximately 300 feet south of 35th Street and replace with new striping to provide a new southbound left turn land for the project's access road. 10a. Widen N. Fourth Avenue on the west side of the street to provide 50 feet of roadway within a 58 foot half width right-of-way between Brisbane to approximately 150 feet south of the SR 54 east bound off ramp. b. Install a raised median on N. Fourth Avenue from the SR 54 eastbound off ramps to a point 300 feet south of Brisbane Avenue. 11. Install a traffic signal and "four-way" concentric intersection at N. Fourth Avenue and Brisbane Avenue. 12. Provide a sewer metering station at or near the Metro interceptor connection. 17·/7 -- ----...... _n_"".._______ . - ---,--~.,..". ---_." ____.u _~__ EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE As defined in the Precise Plan Conditions of Approval. 17' Jrt --~-~-'''''._--~'-'.' ._.._,.~_. ...----.- ,. -,..- ...- -- - - ---~-- --,----~,-_.._._..__._---- Úkf61'~ b - GUARANTY FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE (City of ChuIa Vista) WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista (hereinafter designated as "Beneficiary"), and Chula VISta Town Center Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership, whose mailing address is 12625 High Bluff Drive, Suite 304, San Diego, California 92130, (hereinafter designated as __.i_i¡.¡¡!I!!!li'ill!!I!P~~fl~!!'!rrihc~:a;e:;:: to install and complete certain designated hnprovements (hereinafter designated as "Agreement"), which Agreement is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, under the terms of the Agreement, the Principal is required, before peñonning the work, to furnish a faithful perfonnance bond to secure the Principal's obligations under the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Beneficiary has agreed to accept the guaranty (hereinafter designated as ~Guaranty") of the undersigned I!:î_êí (hereinafter designated as "Guarantor"), in lieu of a faithful performance bond. - and provisions of the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on the Principal's part to be kept and performed, at the thne and in the manner therein provided, and - costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the Beneficiary in successfully enforcing R;I~¡I this Guaranty, to be awarded and fixed by the Court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. Before commencing any action to enforce this Guaranty, the Principal shall first be provided formal notice of any claimef breach sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or by overnight mail delivery service, stating that the Principal shall have ten (10) days to cure such breach. In the event the Principal fails to cure such breach as provided, such claimant shall then provide the Guarantor written notice sent in the same /7-/9 D:lGI9OI0711G_.om - ------".- - - ."-' ._.~---,., --"-~'-"-"-"-' ------', -"'--'-"-~-"---"""--'--'---------'--- GUARANTY FOR FAITIlFUL PERFORMANCE Page 2 tJ~1.¡¡~~ ::r:;t~=~~~~~~~~~:~~t!¡~£d!!~î!1f!!~!! iii ftilÏ foiCeimd effect. The GuarantOr hereby agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the tenns of the Agreement, or the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any manner, affect its obligations under this Guaranty, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration, or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Guaranty has been duly executed by the Principal, to confmn its knowledge of the terms hereof, and the Guarantor on ,1995. Principal Guarantor Chula Vista Town Center Associates, L.P., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation a California limited partnership By: Chula Vista Town Center, Inc., By: a California corporation Robert M. Bedard Vice President By: Its: 12615 High Bluff Drive, Suite 304 701 South Walton Boulevard San Diego, California 92130 Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 Notary acknowledgements of execution of the Principal and the Guarantor must be attached. O:\GI90'Ð7IIGuat1n1J.oII3 I 7·';"(;J --------,'.. . --."'-..... ~--...._._.._,_._...~._-- --..--,,------------...-.-... -,.-.----.'--- .__...-~--~.-._- GUARANTY FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Page 3 STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) On _. 1995 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared . personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) islare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helsbe/they executed the same in hislher/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the ÍIISt11lDlCnt. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) On _, 1995 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of saûsfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that be/sbe/they executed the same in hislber/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislher/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public 0:\0 1!IO\07I1Guron1y.1ID J ') 'tJ../ - __ ______M.___________·_·.____._ __._________~__..._ . "__________~___._._..__.._M_"_·_· .____.~_____ <£ )(."t/\ do It: <ë... GUARANTY FOR PAYMENT OF LABOR AND MATERIALS (City of Chula Vista) WHEREAS, the City ofChula Vista (hereinafter designated as "Beneficiary"), and Chula Vista Town Center Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership, whose mailing address is 12625 High muff Drive, Suite 304, San Diego, California 92130, (hereinafter designated as ¡;¡~..¡~~;..¡:¢ât~~1!qÃ¡.¡II!§ª'¡¡I!~~'!!!~!th~=:~: agrees to install and complete certain designated improvements, which Agreement is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, under the tenns of the Agreement, the Principal is required before perfonning the work, to me a good and sufficient payment bond with the City to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title IS (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the Beneficiary ~ agreed to accept the guaranty of the undersigned ~9Ê (hereinafter designated as "Guarantor"), in lieu of a labor and materials payment bond. NOW, THEREFORE, the Benef.ieiary m.i:¡î9t!¡I~,m¡!I~î¡g~¡II¡fI.q¡.f hereby guarantees payment by the Principal of all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons employed in the perfonnance of the Agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Title of the Civil Code, in the sum of Dollars ($ , lawful money of the United States, mÎ this Guaranty, the Guarantor shall pay, in addition to the face amount hereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the Beneficiary in successfully enforcing this Guaranty, to be awarded and fixed by the Court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. Before commencing any action to enforce this Guaranty, the Principal shall first be provided formal notice of any elaim ef breach sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or by overnight mail delivery service, stating that the Principal shall have ten (10) days to cure such breach. In the event the Principal fails to cure such breach as provided, such claimant shall then provide the Guarantor written notice sent in the same ¡¡¡¡~_i_ii~;"¡;¡¡;~i~¡¡¡!;:rilr~t~a~~J!~~~!¥!'!'¡! BenefiCiary sb81ì tÏIkC any aCtion to eÏúorce this Guaranty. 0:\0190\071\0_,004 / ? -.2..:J.. ----,.. _._---_._"------_.._._,_.--_.---~- -- ---.. -_._._---~-,._._~"--------~--_._- GUARANTY FOR PAYMENT OF LABOR AND MATERIALS - Page 2 The Guarantor hereby agrees that this Guaranty shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of' the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this Guaranty. . Should the Principal fully perform the Agreement ~,;_1~mª!IœI~i¡I!I*Jlllìfl ~1~\~!~, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain ~"""""""",~"":";,,,,;,,, in full force and effect. The Guarantor hereby agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Agreement, or the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any manner, affect its obligations under this Guaranty, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration, or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Guaranty has been duly executed by the Principal, to confirm its knowledge of the terms hereof, and the Guarantor on _, 1995. Principal Guarantor Chula Vista Town Center Associates, L.P., Wal-MartStores, Inc., a Delaware corporation a California limited partnership By: Chula Vista Town Center, Inc., By: a California corporation Robert M. Bedard Vice President By: Its: 12625 High Bluff Drive, Suite 304 701 South Walton Boulevard San Diego, California 92130 Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 Notary acknoWledgements of execution of the Principal and the Guarantor must be attached. O:\GI90\07I1Guaran1y .004 17-,,),,:] ....-.~-_.__._---_.~_._...,....~-_.~------ - GUARANTY FOR PAYMENT OF LABOR AND MATERIALS Page 3 STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) On , 1995 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ackIiowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) On _' 1995 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in hislher/their authOrized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their siph're(s) on the instrument the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public /7-~i 0:1&190\01110_.004 ______.._ . ..._....~__..._~___,..._._~__.,_._ .._....._.__._____.__________u..___.___+_.___.________·_·___.___.___~._ CD<fr-t b rf F SURVEY MONUMENT INSTALLATION GUARANTY (City of Chula Vista) WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista (hereinafter designated as "Beneficiary"), and Chula Vista Town Center Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership, whose mailing address is 12625 High Bluff Drive, Suite 304, San Diego, California 92130, (hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into a Subdivision and Precise Plan Improvement Agreement (hereinafter designated as "Agreement"), dated _, 1995, whereby the Principal agrees to install durable monuments in connection with the subdivision of Parcel Map No. (hereinafter designated as "Parcel Map"), within thirty (30) days after completion and acceptance by the Beneficiary of the improvements described in the Agreement. WHEREAS, the Principal desires to install durable monuments at a later date and to secure this performance by posting security with the Beneficiary. - WHEREAS, the Beneficiary has agreed to accept the guaranty of the undersigned Guarantor, in lieu of a survey monument installation bond. NOW, THEREFORE, the Guarantor hereby guarantees, for the benefit of the BeneÍæiary, in the sum of Dollars ($ ), lawful money of the United States, the installation of durable monuments of the survey for the Parcel Map, which survey was conducted by Nasland Engineering, in accordance with the Parcel Map, a copy of which is on fùe with the City Engineer of the Beneficiary, reference to which Parcel Map is hereby made and the same is incorporated as though set forth in full, and according to the ordinances of the Beneficiary in force and effect at the time of delivery of this Guaranty, on or before the expiration of thirty (30) consecutive days after completion and acceptance by the Beneficiary of the improvements which are described in the Agreement, and that the Guarantor shall pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth. Before commencing any action to enforce this Guaranty, the Principal shall first be provided formal notice of any breach sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or by overnight mail delivery service, stating that the Principal shall have ten (10) days to cure such breach. In the event the Principal fails to cure such breach as provided, such claimant shall then provide the Guarantor written noûce sent in the same m~nner, and the Guarantor shall then have ten. (10) days after expiraûon of the ten (10) day cure period given the Principal as provided above, to cure such breach before the Beneficiary shall take any action to enforce this Guaranty. Should the Principal fully perform its agreement to install durable monuments or should the Guarantor fully perform this Guaranty, then this Guaranty shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The Guarantor hereby agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addiûon to the terms of the Agreement, or the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any O:\GI!XJIII7\ \GuaraI1Iy.OO5 /7' ,,1.--> - - --.--~_._-~~ --.----.-.----... ....--.....-. """"'-'-----"" ..~_.._- __........_..__....'._.'._n_______ SURVEY MONUMENT INSTALLATION GUARANTY Page 2 manner, affect its obligations under this Guaranty, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration, or addition. The liability of the Guarantor on this Guaranty is a guaranty of payment and performance and not of collectibility, and is not conditional or contingent on the genuiness, validity, regularity, or enforceability of the Agreement or other instruments relating to the obligations hereby guaranteed or the pursuit by the Beneficiary of any remedies that it now has or may hereafter have with respect thereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Guaranty has been duly executed by the Principal, to confirm its knowledge of the terms hereof, and the Guarantor on _, 1995. Principal Guarantor '. Chula Vista Town Center Associates, L.P., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation a California limited partnership By: Chula Vista Town Center, Inc., By: a California corporation Robert M. Bedard Vice President By: Its: 12625 High Bluff Drive, Suite 304 701 South Walton Boulevard San Diego, California 92130 Bentonville, Arkansas 72716 Notary acknowledgements of execution of the Principal and the Guarantor must be attached. O:\GI901071~.005 J7-.J¥ ---------~-_...__...._"_._._".,.... -.-.....---...-,--.-----.- - ---....-.....- - - ---""---.-.-... --.... _._._.__._-_.._._._~.-,--- i SURVEY MONUMENT IN~TALLATION GUARANTY Page 3 STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) 00 , 1995 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared , 'personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public STATE OF ) ) COUNTY OF ) 00 _' 1995 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instroment and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public 0:\G11JW111\GaonMy.OO5 J7".2? -----~-~--_._-_.._._--_. -~_._- ---"- ---,.._~_._-_.__._._. --.-----_._- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~ Item I ð Meetinq Date 2/7/95 ITEM TITLE: Resolution /7TR5 Adopting a 1995-96 Legislative Program and Legislative Work Program. SUBMITTED BY: Legislative Committe sid W. Morris I Assi t t city Manager REVIEWED BY: city Manage~ Vote: Yes___ No~) The Legislative Program represe ts the city council's consensus position on items likely to be acted upon by the state Legislature, Congress I or administrative agencies. By adopting a Legislative Program at the beginning of each two-year legislative session I Chula vista can take a proactive role in sponsoring I supporting I or opposing bills related to the city's various legislative priorities. RECOMMENDATION: That the city council approve the resolution adopting the proposed 1995-96 Legislative Program and Legislative Work Program. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: This report from the Legislative Committee reflects their comments as well as input from the department directors and Councilmembers (received as of 2/2/95). DISCUSSION: Backqround The Legislative Program was provided for in the Orqanization and Procedures on Leqislative matters affectinq the citv of Chula vista adopted as Council Policy 300-01 in January 1987. The purpose of the Legislative Program is to identify and adopt position statements regarding a variety of issues which reflect the policy and direction of the Council. This action sets guidelines which permit staff to make timely responses consistent with council's desires to sponsor I support or oppose bills during the legislative process. Historically I the program has been adopted at the beginning of each two-year legislative session and amended as necessary at the midpoint of the session. Chula vista's Legislative Program represents the consensus of the City council on city priorities or issues affecting local government which are likely to be the subject of proposed legislation. By taking action on a comprehensive program at the start of a legislative and congressional sessions I the city is able to stake out a proactive position on issues and work with our local representatives for the introduction of special legislation. /8'" / -"'--"-"~---"'~"-'-'-"-----~--'-------~-'---"-' - ----~.._- Page 2, Item /~ Meeting Date 217/95 Presented in this report is a proposed 1995-96 Legislative Program and a Work Program to guide staff and our legislative consultant (Advocation I Inc,) throughout the session. Leqislative Proqram In general I the Legislative Program lays out the city's positions in the following subject areas: A. Bayfront/Redevelopment B, Fiscal Support/Home Rule C. General Government D. Housing and Community Development E. Economic Development (proposed) F. Land Use Planning G. Environmental Protection H. Public Employer/Employee Relations I. Public Liability J. Public Safety K. Transportation L. Recreation M, Library The Program is divided into two categories, Category I represents those items "which can be acted upon directly by staff with concurrence of the Legislative Committee" (currently Mayor Horton, the City Manager and city Attorney) . Category II consists of legislative items on which Council is interested in taking a more active role, and which are therefore subject to formal Council action. Procedurally I Category I is administered by the Legislative Committee. Such items are generally non-controversial I and include: * Supporting additional state or federal funding for local governments and/or Chula vista programs * opposing unfunded mandates * Protecting city planning and land use authority * Recommending reforms in various state and federal programs Via unanimous adoption of the program by the city council I related bills can be acted upon directly by the Legislative Committee I so that the city's position can be communicated to legislators in the quickest I most effective way. Notification of positions taken and copies of any letters sent are then forwarded to the City Council for information. /~;~ --_._-~-~~.-- -_.-------~._-- _n __~__.,.. ---".----..-------- _..~_.,-- Page 3 I Item ,y Meeting Date 2/7/95 category II contains items which have qeneral City Council support I but on which there is still some debate among Council I and formal city positions may depend upon the exact intent and wording of the proposed bills. Examples include: supporting efforts to: * consolidate state and/or federal environmental regulations * Fund or construct sewage treatment or water supply improvements. * support school I public safety and other bond financing programs opposing efforts to: * Enact additional mandates through the Brown Act. These items are to be actively monitored by the Legislative Committee but are subject to formal Council consideration before any actions may be taken to support or oppose. Proposed 1995-96 Leqislative Proqram The proposed Legislative Program includes several new and amended items I reflecting the input of department staff I Advocation I Inc" the Legislative Committee and Councilmembers. These items address issues raised dur ing the second half of the 1993-94 Legislative session I new city priorities I and new priorities in Sacramento and Washington following the recent elections, The remainder of the program (with some suggested deletions) I is carried over from the 1993-94 Legislative Program. Exhibit "A" shows the 1995-96 proposal as amended from 1993-94, with additions denoted by underline and deletions by strikeout. Individual amendments are each accompanied by a brief justification for their inclusion. Among the proposed changes is the addition of a section dealing with Economic Development. Amendments include: 1) supporting efforts to: * site and finance a state Veterans Home in Chula vista. * Modify the Clean Water Act to obtain a secondary treatment and reclaimed water exemption. /8" .3 ----_.-- ._____._.__._,___.____ ..._"_.__~~._.,____.._._____u_ Page 4 I Item / If' Meeting Date 2/7/95 * Amend the Transit Development Act to allow bus advertising revenue to be earmarked for discounted youth transit passes or other non-traditional programs. * Improve California and Chula vista's business climate (e.g, new Economic Development section I allowance for gambling on international cruises stopping in San Diego) . 2) opposing efforts to: * Weaken or reduce funding for the 1994 Crime Bill * Bailout Orange County/s investment crisis with state taxpayer funds. * Remove local authority to control right-of-way used for cable television or telecommunications. * Infringe upon home rule authority (e.g. rent control limitations I curtailment of fee or assessment authority) 3) Deleting items which have already been accomplished or which are no longer priorities (e,g. impounded vehicle fees, utility project tax increment, revising the method of purging voter registration records), with an up-to-date Legislative Program, staff will be better able to communicate the City/s interests to Congress and the State Legislature. Most importantly, we will be able to communicate that message to our local representatives. As we build on our relationships with Senators Feinstein and Boxer, Congressman Filner, Senator Peace and Assemblywoman Ducheny, we will also be welcoming Assemblyman Baldwin and helping them all to understand--- and fight for---Chula vista's priority issues. Work Proqram In an effort to maximize the city/s resources and impact at the State level, the attached work program (Exhibit "B") has been developed to guide staff and our legislative èonsultant. This document is the result of several contacts with departments I councilmembers, and our legislative consultant. It serves several purposes: A) as a work plan for staff and the legislative consultant; b) narrows the scope of the legislative area to specific issues of concern to Chula Vista; and, c) serves as a valuable tool for setting the city/s agenda and evaluating our lobbying efforts in the state legislative process. The proposed work program is divided by category and priority. Included is a description of each request and recommended follow-up action. The priority assigned to projects is based on the following criteria: Ið""¥ ------------ -~_._--,---_.._-----,--_._.._--- --_.._._--_._._-----_.,,-~- Page 5 I Item /7 Meeting Date 2/7/95 * Urgency (i.e. significant cost or need) * Timing/political climate in Sacramento and Washington * Feasibility As an example I maintenance of funding under the Federal Crime Act of 1994 ($400/000) and the Economic Development Act (BECA grant application for $2 million) is a priority 1 because of the amount of funding at stake and the fact that both programs are currently threatened I either with drastic amendments or elimination. Lower priority items range from those which have a significant fiscal impact but lesser political viability (e.g. Telegraph Canyon Creek improvements I likely to take a back seat to areas hit by January 1995 flooding; priority 2), to projects with low fiscal impact (e.g. Fish and Game fees, $17,000; Priority 3) I to proposals which currently appear dormant (e.g. binational airport; Priority 4) . Although priorities have been suggested I the Work Program should not be considered a static document. It will be reviewed by staff and the Legislative Committee and amended throughout the year to take advantage of the legislative agendas at the local, state and federal levels. It is staff's intent to update the Work Program as needed and provide Council with quarterly status reports on progress achieved, FISCAL IMPACT: Although adoption of the Legislative Program and Work Program for 1995-96 does not result in any cost to the city I the contract with Advocation, Inc. for legislative consulting services I as amended and approved by Council on 11/15/94, constitutes a maximum annual cost of $74/040 inclusive of the base contract and reimbursable expenses. Although the fiscal impacts of the city's legislative efforts can be difficult to estimate (e.g. issues of land use control I potential civil liability) I they have provided substantial I concrete cost savings. In previous years I this has included preservation of $700/000 in agency supplemental subvention revenues, $226/000 in criminal justice grants, $1 million in utility users tax and $120,000 in transient occupancy tax. In 1994, Chula vista and Advocation were instrumental in obtaining amendments to weaken and eventually kill a bill that would have mandated an estimated $70/000 in additional parking ticket processing costs. other efforts helped take city vehicle license revenue off the state budget chopping block (est. $500/000 take- away) I block a measure that would have increased special assessment district administration costs (est. $20,000 per year) I and pass a /,/,,5' - _.._-,."._~_._-~ -_..-----_._.~-_._---------'-_..._-_. - Page 6 I Item ¡g' Meeting Date 2/7/95 law that authorizes cities to collect booking fees from the prisoners they book themselves (est. $10,000 per year). Coming fiscal issues may include cable television deregulation efforts (potential loss of $450/000), preservation of crime Act funding ($400,000), further vehicle license fee raids I final legislation for a $32 million state veterans home in Chula Vista, and $400,000 in Environmental License Plate funds for the Nature Center. Attachments A:\(Al13) \LEGPGMD.113 JY I C"... ¿, --- _._-,----~.._.._.._-------_._---~ 17YI/$ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING A 1995-96 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM AND LEGISLATIVE WORK PROGRAM WHEREAS I Council Policy 300-01, dated January 1987, provides for the adoption of a City Legislative Program; and WHEREAS, in December, 1992, the City Council adopted its 1993-94 Legislative Program in order to set forth the guidelines for reviewing and establishing a City position related to State and Federal legislation and policies; and, WHEREAS, a revised 1995-96 Legislative Program to reflect issues and address concerns raised during the 1993-94 State Legislative Session is contained in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full; and, WHEREAS, as a result of discussions between City staff, department heads, Advocation, Inc. and members of the Legislative Committee and City Council, a Legislative Work Program, attached hereto as Exhibit "B", was developed for 1995-96 to guide the work of staff and Advocation, Inc. regarding issues of immediate concern; and, WHEREAS, said Legislative Program and Work Program are recommended for adoption by the Legislative Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby adopt the 1995-96 Legislative Program as set forth in Exhibit "A". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby adopt the 1995-96 Legislative Work Program as set forth in Exhibit "B". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff and the Legislative Committee are hereby authorized to implement these programs. Presented by J J) Sid Morris Bruce Boogaard Assistant City Manager City Attorney c: \....s\1egp....og I~" 7 __._~__,.. .~.. ._____ u__..__....___.__.__________ _..._.._.".._._.. ,._ _ ~__.. u___ _"__~___·____·__·_________________·.m_.__~ .--. Gxkb:t "A" I 5-96 CHULA VISTA LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM I. LEGISLATION WHICH CAN BE ACTED UPON DIRECTLY BY STAFF WITH CONCURRENCE OF LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE. A. Bayfront - Redevelopment. 1. Support efforts to: a. Provide funding for urban walerfront restoration projects and the enhancement of the waterfront within the southern San Diego Bay. b. Provide additional funding for the Chula Vista Nature Center exhibits from the Environmental License Plate (ELP) Fund. c. Amend the State Community Development law so as to allow a jurisdiction to combine tax incremenl from all projects for use in a specific project. d. Adjust Redevelopment Agency members pay (more than $30 per meeting, up to 4 times per month). e. Seek Port District-State Lands Commission reorganization of tidelands boundaries in cooperation with Rohr and Clæla Vista lIwesto.. bavfront develooers in an effort to make better use of land available for development. 2. Oppose efforts to: a. Disconlinue State supplemental subvention for redevelopment agencies. b. Further control tax increments in redevelopment projects. B. Fiscal Support - Home Rule. 1. Support efforts to: a. Permit retention and control by local governments of a greater portion of revenue generated by Federal, State, and local taxes. b. Require the Federal government and State to reimburse local governments for all mandated cost or regulatory actions or which allow cities to cease oerfonnance of unfunded mandates. (NOTE: Unfunded mandate legislation, as recently introduced in the U.S. Senate as S. 1, is currently leaning toward allowing state and local governments to "opt out" of mandates which are not fully funded.) c. Retain maximum flexibility in the administration of Article XIIIB of the stale constitution (the Gann Initiative--local expenditures are limited by population growth and CPI factors.) d. Expand local autonomy or the home rule authority to govern municipal affairs. 1 18'" - _____.~.__._____+_ __..__.__________.___n._.___ .. - - _.._.____-.__. ..___n. n_ _ _.__._ ! J DRAFT 1995-96 CHULA VISTA LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM I. LEGISLATION WIDCH CAN BE ACTED UPON DIRECTLY BY STAFF WITH CONCURRENCE OF LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE. A. Bayfront - Redevelopment. l. Support efforts to: a. Provide funding for urban waterfront restoration projecls and the enhancement of the waterfront within the southern San Diego Bay. b. Provide additional funding for the Chula Vista Nature Center exhibils from the Environmental License Plate (ELP) Fund. c. Amend the State Community Development law so as to allow a jurisdiction to combine tax increment from all projects for use in a specific project. d. Adjust Redevelopment Agency members pay (more than $30 per meeting, up to 4 times per month). e. Seek Port District-State Lands Commission reorganization of tidelands boundaries in cooperation with Rohr and Clmla Vi.1a mve.to.s bavfront develoDers in an effort to make better use of land available for development. 2. Oppose efforts to: a. Discontinue State supplemental subvention for redevelopment agencies. b. Further control tax increments in redevelopment projects. B. Fiscal Support - Home Rule. I. Support efforts to: a. Permit retention and control by local governments of a greater portion of revenue generated by Federal, State, and local taxes. b. Require the Federal government and State to reimburse local governments for all mandated cost or regulatory actions or which allow cities to cease nerformance of unfunded mandates. (NOTE: Unfunded mandate legislation, as recently introduced in the U.S. Senate as Sol, is currently leaning toward allowing state and local governments to "opt out" of mandates which are not fully funded.) c. Retain maximum flexibility in the administration of Article XIIIB of the state constitution (the Gann Initiative--local expenditures are limited by population growlh and CPI factors.) d. Expand local autonomy or the home rule authority to govern municipal affairs. 1 / r.../(/ --- - -~---"'----'-----'---"-'-"--'----""---'-'-" ---. __~~..._..._ ___on . ...._....._.__~..__~______ e. Enhance the quality of urban life by funding the creation, improvement, or expansion of parks, libraries and community services. f. Provide state/federal funding for construction or renovation of public buildings such as community centers, libraries, civic center, etc. g. Expand Ihe sales tax base to include mail order sales and home shopping sources. h. Provide that cities and school districts can issue general obligation debt with a majority vote instead of the current 2/3 vote requirement. i. PefifÜt sHies ftRd Ii!ÐuBties 18 fees·:er admiaistmtive Bests freM 8'A'BeFS sf iffifJ8UBàeà yekieles \lf8ß pll)"meat af tev:æg &Bà sterllge ehar-ges. (NOTE: Efforts to receive state authorization (AB 1497; co-sponsored by San Diego and Chula Vista) were abandoned in 1992, with many cities now charging the fees without a specific authorization. Chula Vista began charging these fees in August, 1994, with monthly revenues so far of approximately $10,000.) J. Adjust the unitary tax roll procedures so that the jurisdiction in which major utility projects are constructed receives substantially more fiscal benefit than is currently provided for. k. Provide for fiscal reform in the form of greater reliability, certainty, and equitability of state funding for local governments. 2. Oppose efforts to: a. Restrict or allocate the use of Transient Occupancy Tax revenues. b. Exempt residential users from the Ulility Users' Tax. c. Reallocate fines and forfeitures. d. Repeal Gas Tax exemption for local agencies. e. Reallocate sales and property tax revenue to the detriment of local governments. h Limit cities' authoritv to enact or imDose mobilehome or residential rent control. (NOTE: This has been the intent of several recent bills, such as AB 122, AB 1320 and AB 3578) It,. Limit cities' authoritv to enact and assess fees to recover the full cost of Drovidine: user-sDecific services. (NOTE: Aside from AB 1600, which placed significant limits on assessment of development fees, several bills regulate or propose to regulate when cities may charge fees for services. Examples include booking fee legislation and SB 95, last year's attempt to broaden the Public Records Act.) h. Infrim!e on home rule authoritv to act on local budl!et and fiscal matters or other municiDal affairs. 2 ¡r" / I ----,------~._-----_._--~._.,."._'-_.- .-....._--_._------_.~ -_.._",------ (NOTE: Converse of I.B.1.d. Efforts are frequently made at the state level to mandate expenditure levels on particular items, such as education and public safety via Proposition 98 and AB 2788 or to subject local actions to approval by the state or electorate, such as was defeated in last year's ACA 45.) h Overhaul the California Public Records Act in a wav that would: restrict cities' control of the means of access to infonnation assets (e.I!. comDuter databases. nronrietarv software). limit cost recovery for nrovidimr such access. or violate the Drivacv of the Darties from whom the data was collected. (NOTE: SB 95, which is expected to resurface this year would threaten the investment cities make in computerized databases by mandating that all infonnation be available free of charge. The way this proposal has been written, it would allow a private business to demand a free copy of Chula Vista's GIS system or other databases. That business would then be pennitted to package and sell the infonnation contained in that database with no obligation to compensate the City for its work in building or maintaining that database.) C. General Government. 1. Support efforts to: a. Subject the State Legislature 10 the same requirements for public meetings, advance agenda, etc. as currently imposed on cities through the Brown Act. b. Eliminate the State's requirement which mandates Project Committee and/or Boards & Commissions members to complete a fmancial disclosure statement. c. Free the sample ballot of campaign rheloric and distortion. d. Remm the "pesiti\'B pHr--ge If æ.ethed sf feæs\'ing ex-eBSS HaHies rrem iRe yater registætiSR fells:. (NOTE: Records are currently verified/purged from the rolls by mailing a response card following a Presidential election in which a voter did not vote. Staff sees this as a sufficient method of purging the rolls and recommends this item not remain a City legislative priority.) e. Limit to I % the amount of administrative costs the Board of Equalization may charge to administer local sales taxes such as San Diego's 1/2 cent sales taxes for transportation and justice facility construction. f" Allow I!amblinl! on internatinnal cruises. rCl!ardless of the number of U.S. stnDS. (NOTE: Current law only allows gambling on cruises directly to and from the U.S. This has led cruise lines leaving Los Angeles for Mexico to eliminate most stops at the Port of San Diego.) [" Facilitate increases in Ooen Soace District assessments bv an amount not to exceed the Consumer Price Index (CPD. 3 /r'/~ ._._______,_____.__+__...______'M__'__'...".__~______________________"_ ~.._-------'~- (NOTE: Current restrictions on special assessments, and other "reauthorization" or protest proposals, such as ACA 45, infringe on the City's ability to recover the costs of water utility increases and other effects of inflation.) 2. Oppose efforts to: a. Mandate districl elections in all cities and/or school districts. b. Limit: imposition of franchise fees, taxes, or other comDensation for use of Dublic rie:ht-of-wav: local rate rel!ulation: oDerational oversi!!ht: or ri!!ht-of-wav controls on cable television operators and other telecommunications oroviders and utilities. (NOTE: Last year's failed S 1822 would have eliminated most local regulation of cable and telephone services to pave the way for free competition on the Information Superhighway. New attempts at the same goal threaten franchise fee revenue (approximately $410,000) and open up the City's roads---literaIly---to unchecked trenching by a rush of deregulated companies looking to install fiberoptic or cable wires.) £" Bail out Oran!!e Countv's investment crisis with state taxDaver funds (NOTE: As referred by the City Council) D. Housing & Community Development. I. Support efforts to: a. Exclude redevelopment agencies from competitive bidding statues and fair market value restrictions for resale of public properties to permit joint development of public facilities by private developers upon findings of public benefit. b. Extend the following three Federal Low-Income Housing Programs: i. Mortgage Credit Certificate Program for low/moderate income home buyers; 11. Tax Credits for low income housing programs: and, iii. Continue funding for HUD HOME and HOPE Programs. c. Change Federal banking regulations to exempt banks from having to count financing or Letters of Credit for low income housing in their risk capital limit calculations. d. Finance and develoD additional state Veterans homers) and site sucb a home in Chula Vista. (NOTE: Medical Center Drive site is currently under consideration for a $32 million facility and an initial funding package from California Veterans Services Officers.) 2. SUDDOrt DrinciDles for housin!! element reform ICI!islation as recommended bv the SANDAG Housin!! Element Advisorv Committee and aDDroved bv the SANDAG Board. 4 JlJ""/ ;l .._~-_._----------_.,-_._~.. (NOTE: Several competing efforts have been made to refonn housing element law. SANDAG has taken the lead on representing County agencies' interests on this issue. This position is recommended to facilitate ChuIa Vista taking a fonnal position concurring with SANDAG decisions on this subject.) 3. Oppose efforts to: a. Grant the State or Federal government approval or veto authority in the implementation of local redevelopment and rehabilitation projects. b. Prohibit any state agency from making subventions, financing, insurance or any other kind of assistance, available to any city or county which has in effect any rent control measure. E. Economic DeveloDment. (NOTE: This new section has been added to support funding for Chula Vista economic development initiatives, programs which benefit Chula Vista businesses, and programs to enhance California's competitiveness. Support efforts to: 1. Enhance California's overall bu~iness climate. 2. Provide fundin!!. Droe:rammatic SUDDort or other assistance to the Border Enviromnental Commerce Alliance. Border Enviromnental Technolo!!V Resource Center. and Border Enviromnental Business Cluster. and to the Chula Vista Hi!!h Tech/Biotech Zone. Droposed contract biotech Dhannaceutical Dilot manufacturine: facilitv. and other Chula Vista economic develoDment initiatives. 3." Establish a California Trade and Commerce A!!encv-sDonsored Business Enviromnental Assistance Center IBEAC) satellite facilitv in Chula Vista. Dossiblv at the Border Enviromnental Technolol!v Resource Center. 4. Continue or enhance fundin!! of: a. California Trade and Commerce A!!encv b. U.S. DeDartment of Commerce. Economic DeveloDment Administration ŒDA) !;" U.S. Housine: and Urban Development (HUD) business assistance Droe:rams d. EXDort assistance. defense conversion. iob trainin!l and other economic develoDment pro!!rams for which Chula Vista businesses would Qualifv and secure such fundin!! for Chula Vista Droiects and/or businesses. S. Create or enhance tare:eted business assistance DrO!!ramS (such as state Enterprise Zones or federal EmDowennent Zones) with eli!!ibilitv criteria that would include Chula Vista. 6. Create or enhance pro!!rams which SUDDort international cross-border commerce. 7. Increase the nexibilitv of the use of HUD Community Develonment Block Grant funds as they relate to !!eneral economic develoDment Droiects and Dro!!rams. 8. Increase nexibilitv of the California redeveloDment laws as they relate to e:eneral economic develoDment DrO!!Tams. 5 / r' /If ----~_._-------_._--_._--_._-'-_...- . ._._---~-,-'"..~--_.._-------- F. Land Use Planning. 1. Support efforts to: a. Strengthen local government's powers and capacity to prepare, adopt and implement fiscal plans and programs for orderly growth, development, beautification, and conservation of their planning areas. b. Are consistent with the doctrine of "home rule" and the local exercise of police powers, through the planning and zoning processes, over local land use. c. Expand the land use, conservation, and growth management policies of municipalities to Ihe unincorporated territories within their spheres of influence. d. Broaden local government's power to require developers and subdividers to provide the on-site and off-site facilities and infraslructure needed by their projects. e. Maximize the authority of the City to exercise local control over general plan decisions. f. Require special districts to adopt facility master plans which are consistent with City and County general plans and growth management programs, and to adopt five year capital improvement programs and financing plans which are consistent with their facility master plans. g. Permit processing/provide funding for a Master ErR for biomedical/biotech industrial development in Chula Vista. 2. Oppose efforts to: a. Abridge local government's ability to effectively plan, or regulate local land use including: amendments to the laws governing local agency formation (LAFCO); legislation which would financially overburden local governments in their efforts to amend planning policy, regulate land use through removal of incompatible developments, redevelop blighted areas, or annex territories which are within the spheres of influence. b. Site a regional or bi-national airport in the Otay Mesa area. G. Environmenrnl Protection. 1. Support efforts to a. Require an environmental impact report (ErR) for large projects/utility mergers. b. Obtain funding for wetlands and riparian habitat acquisition and restoration, and funding for acquisition of land needed for multi-species habitat conservation planning. c. Fund planning and land acquisition for Natural Community Conservation plans created by AB 2172 (Kelley) (1991). 6 Ii"~ I> -----,.~-_._---_.~~---_.__.._._---~------_.._-~._--- d. Obtain funding for a comprehensive environmental management planning effort for San Diego Bay. e. Prohibiting the granting of new leases for oil and gas development in state-owned coastal waters off of San Diego County. f. Encourage the installation of water conserving fixtures in existing residences and businesses. g. Obtain funding for water conservation to include the construction of reclaimed water distribution systems, and fixture and irrigation system renovation and retrofit. h. Develop an ongoing, reliable statewide funding source to acquire, develop and/or maintain open space, greenbelts, rivers, streams and trails. i. Expand and utilize existing landfills in the county. j. Encourage post-consumer recycled products use in manufacturing, residential and business applications through incentives, education, promotions, etc. k. Truth in labeling efforts which identify a product's regional recyclability, and its post- consumer recycled content. I. Require "disposal warning" labeling on household hazardous materials, which reduce the use of toxic materials, and which promote nontoxic alternatives to present materials. m. Require minimum content standards for use of recycled materials in manufacturing processes. n. Provide funding for environmental enterprise incentives. o. Reauthorize AB 1467. ChaDter 1259, Statutes of 1993. Drovidim! state Davments to al!encies which ODerate curbside recvcline: DrOl!rams. (NOTE: State support under this law helps suhsidize the city's curbside recycling program. This law expires at the end of FY 94-95.) Ih Reauthorize the Federal Water Resources Act. includine: Drovisions to raise the reimbursement limit and Drovide reimbursement for construction eXDenditures. (NOTE: With a revised reimbursement limit, Chula Vista could be eligible for an additional $1 to $3 million for further improvements along the Telegraph Canyon Creek flood control channel.) Jh Modifv the Clean Water Act to I!ive the Citv of San DiCl!o an exemDtion rather than a waiver from the reQuirement of uDl!radinl! the Point Loma treabnent Dlant to a secondary treabnent facilitv or Drovidinl! reclaimed water. (NOTE: Existing mandates carry a potential cost of $1.7+ billion to San Diego County---approximately $130 million to Chula Vista. Reclaimed water would add a cost of $10 per residence per month. An exemption from these requirements would provide greater/more lasting cost protection than a waiver.) 7 IB'" II- ----~- ----------+--------------- --- - -- - ------ - - - -----~.-----~--------- g" Limit environmental mitie:ation reauirements for construction and maintenance of draina2e facilities in urban areas. (NOTE: At present, the city may be required to purchase mitigation land amounting to as much as four times the project size.) r. ReDeal AB 3158. Ch. 1706. Statutes of 1990 (Fish and Game fees) (NOTE: This law requires all project applicants and public agencies subject to CEQA to pay the Department of Fish and Game a filing fee of $1,250 for projects requiring negative declarations and $850 for those requiring Environmental Impact Reports.) §" Grant local a2encies authoritv to file aDDeals with the State Water Oualitv Control Board rsWOCß) concernin2 actions bv a R""ional Water Oualitv Control Board iRWOCß). (NOTE: San Diego's RWQCB actions have not always taken Chula Vista's best interests into co...ideration. The City currently lacks an effective recourse.) H. Public Employer-Employee Relations. I. Support efforts to: a. Protect the rights of City's to establish conditions of employment, including hours, wages, employee benefits, the meet and confer process, appeal procedures, and management rights. b. Reform California Workers' Compensation Program to reduce public costs and tigblen restrictions. c. Amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to ensure that executive, administrative and professional employees still qualify as exempt. 2. Oppose efforts to: a. Impose restrictions on the scope and authority of charter cities to control their own health plans or retirement SYSIeInS. b. Mandate the inclusion of local government employees in the Social Security Syslem and/or Medicare. c. Increase workers' compensation benefits without also making needed reforms. d. Mandate changes, impose limitations, and/or other benefit plans, wages, hours, or working conditions which are properly determined Ihrough the meeting and confer process. e. Mandate mental health coverage in group health insurance plans. f. Reduce local control over public employee disputes and impose regulations of an outside agency (such as PERS). a /g"17 ..,-.. ---- ----_.~~_..__.._,-_.__..__.- -- --- g. Prohibit an employer from testing an employee or applicant for employment for illegal substances. I. Public Liability. I. Support efforts to: a. Change Ihe legal principal of "joint and several liability" to protect the City against "deep pocket" liability. b. Reinforce public entity design and discretionary act immunity. c. Prohibit recovery by a plaintiff for injury where those injuries were caused as a result of avoiding a police pursuit. d. Enact tort liabilitv reform (NOTE: To minimize governmental financial exposure from frivolous lawsuits, both the state legislature and Congress are expected to introduce various tort reform proposals.) 2. Oppose efforts to: a. Further erode government immunity. b. Force the Citv to acceDt risks it would not normallv accept in the ordinary course of business. such as in the case of mandatinl! acceDtance of below-I!rade or low- e:rade sureties on Derformance bonds or labor and materials bonds. (NOTE: This was done recently in Civil Code §99S.660 and .670. Such mandates can result from special interest legislation from insurance or financial industries.) J. Public Safety. I. Support efforts to: a. Strengthen present State and Federal laws which give local governments Ibe power to further restrict or regulate prostitution. b. Increase penalties for the manufacture or sale for profit of dangerous drugs including but not limited to PCP, methamphetamine and narcolics. (NOTE: See former item h.; redundant) c. Prohibit the sale and brandishing of replica or facsimile firearms. d. Toughen drunk driving laws, Denalties or enhancements. (NOTE: See fonner item g.; redundant) e. Require notification be given to local law enforcement prior to the release of a prisoner in that County/City. 9 Ir'l f' ~---"-~--~--_._~.-_.__...- ._..-_..,--~--_.._-----",._--,--._,------ f. Strengthen the City's ability to regulate the public display of material which is harmful to minors. g. IS6F8as8s àmnl: ElRYiag p8Rftlties Øßà 8Rfi.aneeæsBts. (NOTE: See item d.) h. SlippeR legislatieR ·.,'fiieh pF('~~:ideB a "sRalt;" af life iHtf3fÎS8B1B8Rt fer iBàiviàuats 8ew'ieted sf selling deadly àmgs fef IneRt. (NOTE: See item b.) i. Permil forfeiture of all assets of drug dealers whicb would Ihen be committed to drug enforcement programs. j. Allow lagging (i.e. serialized identification) of beer kegs in an effort to reduce under age consumption of alcoholic beverages. k. Permits the slaffing of Photo Radar posts by properly trained non-sworn personnel. I. Permits the issuance of a photo radar citation to trigger the arrest warrant process. m. Provide !!reater authoritv for Doliee or other local a!!encies to control !!raffiti. curfews. iuvenile crime and alcoholic bevera!!e control. (NOTE: SB 1779, AB 3805, AB 3797, AB 2742, and AB 2897 are examples of new laws which have given Poliee departments a greater role in fighting juvenile crimes and blight caused by overconcentrated or poorly-managed liquor stores.) n. Provide fundine: for local Doliee staffine:. Dro!!ramS or eouiDment. (NOTE: The 1994 Crime bill was a great help in this area--Chula Vista has received preliminary approval to hire four new officers, with a promise of partial federal funding of approximately $100,000 per year for three years.) 2. Oppose efforts 10: a. Preempt local ordinances concerning Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. b. Overturn or reduce the fundine: for items contained in the federal Crime Act of 1994. (NOTE: Congress has expressed some interest in rewriting the 1994 Crime Bill, particularly the prevention portions of it such as funding for midnight basketball programs. Current proposals---HR 3 and S 3---would recast the Crime Bill as state or local block grants, with final funding yet to be determined. Approximate funds at stake for Chula Vista: $116,000) K. Public Works/Transportation. I. Support efforts to: 10 IY - d J ¡-- ) ï --'-~~_.._--~------- ------.-.---...---..-"-,--......---.....---.-....--..._,_._---~~~ a. Enact clean-up legislation related to transportation funding. b. Provide funding which would complete missing freeway links; emphasis on SR-125 and 1-905. (NOTE: Private toll-road funding for 1-905 may provide needed boost to complete this transit corridor and take additional traffic off Chula Vista surface streets leading to 1-805.) c. Fund local transportation projects. d. Reduce municipal costs associaled with CALTRANS projects. !h Amend the Transit DeveloDment Act ITDA) to allow bus advertisin!! revenue to be eannarked for discounted vouth transit DasSes or other non-traditional Dr01lrams. (NOTE: As referred by the City CounciI.) h Allow local a!!encies flexibilitv in comDliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act to Drovide the !!reatest benefit to the local disabled DODulation. rather than committin!! scarce resources to achievement of 2% maximum sidewalk and drivewav SIODes. (NOTE: As referred by the City Council) L. Recreation. I. Support efforts to: a. Provide state/federal funding for City programs in: the arts; child care: gang prevention and diversion, and drug prevenlion and intervention in a community-based recreation setting. M. Library. Support efforts to: I. Provide for continued funding of: the state Public Library Fund (PLF), California Library Services Act (CLSA), Library Services and Construction Act (LSCA), literacy programs, and library construction and renovation. 11 /8'''.2 (} ""-_.~~"_._-~--~~-_. -- .-.----... -.---.__.._-. .-..----..---------.-. II. LEGISLATIVE ITEMS REQUIRING FORMAL COUNCIL ACTION. A. Bayfront - Redevelopment. 1. Support efforts to: a. Consolidated control and adnñnistration of environmental regulations and enforcement; presently in Department of Interior; Corps of Engineers; Department of Commerce; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); Environmental Protection Agency (EP A). b. Coordinate Federal Coastal Zone Management Act, Environmental Prolection Agency (EP A) regulations and State Coastal Zone Act, in an effort to eliminate duplicate efforts. c. Enhance business attraction and retention (Governor's Program of Competitiveness). 2. Oppose efforts to: a. Reduce the number of San Diego Unified Port District Commissioners and/or require commissioners to be elected members of Ihe City Council which they represent. B. Environmental Protection. 1. Support efforts to: a. Approve the coordination of State, Federal and local agency responses to air quality control, energy, and environmental protection. b. Seek funds for facilities to capture and treat the flow of raw sewage entering San Diego from Tijuana. c. Encourage development of environmentally sound techniques for treating hazardous waste to reduce its volume and elinñnate any toxicity. d. Provide funding to study the water quality/loxic pollution in San Diego Bay. e. Encourage development of water resources facilities and make improvements to the delta. f. Obtain financial assistance at the federal level to construct new and upgrade existing secondary treatment facilities in San Diego County. C. General Government. 1. Support efforts to: a. Fund school facility construction programs. b. To clarify the authority of school districts to impose facilities fees established by CH 887, Statutes of 1986 (AB 2926). 12 H ~:fJ /~p{/ - .._---~_.__._---~_.~-_.._~----_._._..,-,.~-- "--' ---"'~---~~--_._-~---,._----- £" Authorize cities to establish sDecial assessments for sDecified local services. subiect to aDDroval bv the local electorate. (NOTE: Special property assessment legislation is frequently introduced to provide additional options for funding such items as police services and equipment, library services, and business district improvements. 2. Oppose efforts 10 a. Impose grealer restrictions on local government through amendment of the Brown Act. D. Housing and Community Development. 1. Support efforts to: a. Develop Federal and State participation and financial support for creative programs 10 provide adequate housing for the elderly, handicapped, and low-income persons Ihroughout the community. b. Maintain and create tax incentives for private revitalization of existing commercial, industrial and housing resources where such assistance benefits the City. E. Public Safety. I. Support efforts to: a. Increase municipal funding for the removal of abandoned vehicles. 2. Oppose efforts to: a. Change/remove date and/or shift to the employer the burden of proof related to firefighter cancer presumption. b. Shift to the employer Ihe burden of proof related to Public Safety AIDS presumption. 13 / ¡-,.).:J... --~._-------_._,------- _...__._._--_._,..~-_._"--~....._. - ---~--.--,_._- ~ J. t..~ . , ¡:Q . I :IJ 0 . !; ~ ~ ~~] ~ ¡'j ~ :~! ,,J ~ ~ (~ ~ g,....s ...9 ...~ !ii i:íJ 1>J E U !ii !! .. ~. ~ ;9 0 11 .,; ~1!iiJJ8~ ~~Iß"8 ~~~~~. ~ l1t1 ..=,&J ~ ,¡:: ~ '.: ::; _ :::s c.. ~ .~ 0 ~ ~ 0 .s .. ] ,.c _ .~ ~ ..2 ~ i [i Ii ~ J) i} ~i ~ j ~:~}~ ~ f§ 1 i i - - - -- ~ .... ~ ~~ fJ~~~~J ~~~¡JJ ~f ~~ ~J~~5~1 s!~~~~ ~~ ~~ u'¡8~~fi' ]~:lJo:g- .... ~~ j....:"'~~ j ~~Q. =- ~ .S! ~ 1 ~ ø': ~ ; ~ ~ .s ~ !ii _ r.. 0 _ ~ o~ ¡§ rq 8 ..Œ 5~ 0 .. ...... ..:!i .a& .~ ~ ] ~.ašg·· ~[ j J! ¡...o~ ~ ~ ~<.> .~ .~ ~ .~" j i ~ -ø; ~ 0 - "a :.= 0 ëï.: .;: " ¡... ~ ~ 50... .~..:: ~ '60 .!I rI ,,~- i! ...¡¡!::~!;~..:I "., IiõI ¡¡ 8 ~ ~ a ~ ~ "'!';9"'], F - .~ § ~'':: ¡... - g. .S 8 ~ 2 0 !ii ~ R ] ;: 5 >.. 5 Q) .~..c"'O "'0 e _0 'jj lJ ~ ~ I - g, ¡¡ &..B ] .~ !ii ~ ~ ~ :S î § ] / aJ ¡..." ~ ~ ~ .!3" 0 ':". !J ~ e ~~ ii ~ <.> ." ~ "" ¥J g '" g¡ > ,,'" "';: 1;1 Q...;¡¡¡ d g ~ ~ d <.> ::< ;¡ Õ .. 1:1" " -" 0 .. ..... ." 8 0 ¡¡ g¡ .... .... CI) ~. 0 8 ';¡ = ~ co "t: ';: ¡: ~ -: ~ þ ¡¡ ~ 8 .g ~ do' ·ß "iJ .¡;¡ ~.j 8. ~ ~ ~ ~ <.> d ~ " ...~ lI' "" I; ¡¡ L " ~ .." '" .IJ :s ~1~18.~I~g ~ ~=~Bjj: A ~l§ ~ ~ ~ aJ £ ¡... û '¡ R E" ] 8'~ l .~ s·ß ~ ~ 8 § ':1 ~ I'-< ~ ~ .;j !J ii .S¡ 11 s ~ '" :.a ~ ~ .~ .3 3 ~ i if 6. t~ ª .a I ~.~ OÏ¡ ::g .S! '" ;> 8' ~ ~ 0 11 11 g ø:: u ~ ¿ I CJ 1 ~ ) Y<.2.3 __ _________________________...__n__ ______..____.._____ ,","+,...... _~___~___________ ~l~ 'Õ'Q ª- ~ 6i!. ~ I ~ ~ ~f n~"I1 0-::0; S'~ ~c: ~f~l¡Jlii o ~ 1i ~ ¡¡ ! " ~. ~'8 (JQn ¡g rn ~ Þ! "''' ~Q <::1- ~ ~ ~ ;-.;, g- s r¡ ~[2:,<~~0~r¡ 1 ~. ~ a (3 o. !!!;¡ ~i (tI _. c 0 '"t '""" (þ or S' a-~¡¡: ~ g' ~ ; ~ ~ ¡ ~ ~ æ C" I " 0 ¡¡en '" ~ '" ~. ~ O. ::1- ~. g' ~'< ~. " '" '" so Q 0 (þ õ ~(JQ ;;. Õ g' Š"' (þ -e.1 8"[",.. ~ "" ~o ¡;'s ~ '" - en (l. ""t '"' 0 ~. g- o r¡ 8 '" ..,. õ ¡¡ 0 ¡ 8"..., ~ § 8' '<~~ ¡e.';i] ¡¡ (3- ;:¡-5'< ~ ~ ...,- ~"O.. SO", ¡¡ ~ Ii - < "0 . (I) .g ~51 S' '" n '" 0 ~ g. g,Sß"ã'Q;(38"~g. ~ ~~ n~ (JQ '< :I: ~a " " SO" S'''' ~ " ~ g. ::E" .,. ~ . ~o ~~ " S' g. S (JQ it. ~ ¡:,: e. ~Oen (3 " - " ~ ~ '" g õ' ¡¡ SO ~.,. fJC¡fZtX -¡¡! o SO =-g "",, 0 -" ~ ~ ¡¡.§ S " '" 0 ~ " ~ ..., 0.,. ~õ;o '" '< (þ s·]. ] ] ~ S '" ¡s ~ g 8" w§" ~ 0 '" en ~ Q (þ g:š-g-~ ~fZ ã ~ (JQ S' ~ ~ [ ~. ~ s [! nc: ..,.... .... - ~ iff!¡. [n ~ ~ ~ rt;s. ~ '? ~ ~ o. " en SO~ ~. ¡¡ '" " '" 0:0 1i~ soS' g.~'!O SO=- ~. ~o '" ~Q " ~ g, <0 ':-'" . (Ð $E Š' ~ (þ (') ~. e¡ R<> e: Š'''" " g. ~ SO ê. ::1- tT1 " =- . 0 '<.. (b- "," ..., '" '" ... L. "" " § '8 ~ ~¡gõ [~~ ~ S'''' S' ~ '" ,,'" ..... cr i;'t _"1~ !\" ~ ~ a.",_ '" 0 ~ I' (þ .... 0 " s,§ '< ..., 0 8 :..., '" < . a¡ ~. ¡; Q" ~ S' ~ 0; (JQ _ e ë;.:~ Ii ... '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ E:: aE:: ~ ~{~ ~ G '" ~ E:: ~. ~ i ¡ E:: -st ~. ~ ~ S' ~ E:: ~ ~. II· o rn' ~ ~ ~. ~~ ª ~ '< [ ª. ~ ¡; 0 6' [~ ª. rÞ!s-"'¡¡, _0 . r¡ !!. a s¡ 0; ~$.·ii ! Q. ~ Õ ã:=:E~õ ?1 ~ ~ " " 2: õ ~"" ~ s :d'¡¡'" a ~.-< 8' '" _ " ·B.õ:' " s¡ . (JQ ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ - g' õ ~ §'!s '< ~ æ.: é': g" ~. " "g. e..::;.' ~ . ~ ~'< ~ 1'1" '< '" '" g ~ :;:t. '" ' g /g'~..2.i "-,.._._--.~--_.__.._. - -----...--- -.-...- -~_........__...__.'--'._..__._-_.._." -- .----- .'.-----""--'-' - - -"._----- ~ .S .... " ~ = '" ~ ] .~ 0 j 00\ E/ >. þ !~~~8 ]3~ .~] ¡(J it U > - .". ~ 0 = 's. ]I S O='s. :S g, '3 Ë¡!it; ..... ..... 0 0 ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 0 ~ U1 Õ .. - ~ ~" = ..: '" ~ " - '"'ë'~ ¡ E/ ê ...i5ë~ E/ '5 ~ 'j ~ ~ 1 " ~ 1j·~ 0 " .¡; 0 is !i " Q. 0 õi ë' ~"",=]~ ~¡¡e ~ ~"']¡¡ ~ ~ Q. p.. 8- '" '" '" '" - '" '" ~o~ § ¡"":E/~..;goS 1!~ ~ t! § .§..8 d > ' ,.: .~ '" ~-~ - ~"~8j~] . ~ ~ - '" ~ "'~ª ]~ §~ ~ ~ Ë:ä ~~ Ô.S ..... ~ '" ] ~I . 0 ¡g ¡(J ... - 0 "" ',= , -;:;- .. ~ >. U -<'';: o .~ 0\ .g . 0' ~ . 1".;:;,:-= '" " .~ .. !J~ 0\ > .. þ>~ U ..,~ ~ J¡¡~]~ ::! .~ ~ ~.; .~ e ~ ~ g. Up.. - " fg' E/ ~ §. ~ ~~ ~< 'B . ~ g~E/'å ¡¡ .. þ'->ø::: 'S J = æ ~.s '" ¡¡ '.c _ - ¡¡ !i ." 0 § ë §'E t:)::¡äîre,!. - !i '.g . "';' 12 ~ ..: U .~ ~ [.... ] 1) § Ë øq¡ , 8 i'~ ~ ïJ ¡j EI '" - = 0 , ." > .~ .~ ¡g ~'5j!i > . ~ ¡(J..- .g 8 ¡¡: p.. ~ e ïJ '3 .~ .g '3 ri ~8 æ n¡o .~ ~ § ~ 'C - Ë ~'" ..!:14 'ë> C( c.. .a ~ '¡g '" ..:::: ..... 23 i~ ø: 0 _ ~ .~ f~ 1 S·· ~~ ~ .¡¡ .!i! ~g.~ '" 8 " ~ 0 . 88;,g;;e '3 'æ 0 " ~ ~ ."ø: u-_- " ~ ~ ~ 0 _ '" ~ " .¡¡ " "8 - " __...... .0 '+-0 ..... .:= f-<..2 ~ § § 'C .9 .~ " oo'ë>8.°~ ~] . _ 2!. .~ 'E >. 0 - s= JJ .g <¡[ ð..o ~ ð oS .¿ 1'9 ~!"O~~ §~ .lj J! ca ..s:::I..... "« - a !i ...g .§ § I £ = = § ~ ,.J!;å] '8.~¡(J~~ ::!S!Jl3o > ''': ~J ¡; ~.g 1E/~~ e 1::!i § tI:I~t+::~ ¡¡ ¡U 1::.B ~ .." 1~~'å " 1:g":="~ '1 1J ~ :~ 1 ~ e J 8-;:¡ ø: § .9 .. ~.¡ 'š '.c ] ~ ~ ~ ø:::'~ ~ ø:~i=!:] ;:¡ 8 .S ~'i! ëJ..g~ f-< g. . '3 ! ~ .~ j .~ ~ " := &3£ ;:¡ æ -- J r r ;23> -.----.-.--- -..'.--.--. - ------.". ........---,--.-,.,----.---....-- --~_...- ,.... ...-..."....--..----"..--.-.--.-- i ~ ..., æ r. z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. $! õ' g. ~ , ~ 00 (") .g or. £! ~ a- 8 1f !? ~~=i ~ 0 ..... I'Ø "'J is 0 '"<1 (¡ '" ~~~1 g-~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~. g" g. ë (3 ~ <06 g"!!.õ G or.~ ~"S!. ~$!~~i~ or. 6 .j' 0 o O"~ I ~ ~ " [51 I>'- ~õ i ~oo~ï= ~ ~ f i :3. [ '" ~ ~ e. " g c¡s ~[~m ] g~:;i E o ..... () (þ ~ fJ: ~, (") _CÐ (JQ ~ ~ ¡g,I:;: ~ ~ ;.a.~ fn (") 0-- ;::;.' -'e. (þ . N õ:¡. ~ . i' e ~ ~. ¡¡ 0 a ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ¡ £I ~::t';.;'(r S' ~ g. 11 11 ~ ~ . 00 0 ,,-- ~.j'"o~ ::;.' (;! ~ ~ ~ ª ¡¡¡ 00 , ¡¡ ~. (JQ _....::tI i < g. - ~ ~. = (3 if ~ ~. ~ & ~ ~ g.g ~"~ §.~::c '< , 8e¡ e;Õ' ~ Ii ~ ::3.::- o ~. ~ ~. § " . ~. ~~ :3 '" Iõ (þ ~ :::t. s: o Õ a. . (3 ~ ~ § g¡ fJ: '< ~ 8(JQ -< rT g' Q; 5!: > 8' ~~> ;.11~ o - ~. ~ ~ !!. f!. 8 o " ~ ~ 0 ;'g~ " ª '" " .... g ~ "gõ8 ~~~ = . ~ ~ 1i! ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ "0"0"2. g > tn· 11 g. ~ õ' ¡¡ õ e. (3 ~. ..... ~ ~ 00 0 ~ ~ e? ;s.¡¡ ....~ õ' ~ f¡ !!.Õ ""a Õ' f¡ [ p ;. :¡. ~ " ;. .... ... 8 § .... .... N - - .... ~1:g~ ï= ï= O--ã!> &~ ~ ~(¡8~ï= '"t ~ \0 5f en 0 ª. ~ '0 ~ .. " or. ª r or. ~ ~ e. S' .þ. ..... ;}' 00 " r~g~õ' õ õ -~-&.- (þ .... :T e. Iõ . :< :< (þ t,;J (þ S' .; eo (') ~. - g .... 0"~'!9. ¡¡ «- 0" " '"<1 ..... c. so ã.~ ;-c. ~ S' ¡ .. G~' ¡; !!. < - 'l],g.g fJ: ~ ;n ~ . ;- [ " 0 õ> o - .... ö! .. " ~ .. !,¡ ! ;¡- '" '" ~ ;, " 3 )<;r....d.~ -'--'--'~--"""--'---"----'----~'-'--'-~-----'----"-- _ ____....._......_....._...._m__ ------~- I !) February 6, 1995 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Gerald Young I Senior Management Assistan~ SUBJECT: Agenda xtem 18, February 7 meeting The attached page was mistakenly omitted from this week's agenda packet. This page recommends actions and priorities for items which appear in the proposed Economic Development section of the Legislative Program, Please add it to the Legislative Work Program (Exhibit liB") for Item 18. JY /Y-:<7~¡} 8 "f 1 ]f~f .! f" }I if ~ e ~ i rC~] I J š"'~ 1.;¡ § ~Ji JÞ~S ·gfJI,< J11~t~ '13· .¡ ::!J I!,~ ¡...~.!! = - - N N -..cN- ~!iij1J~ ! ..... g ~! fi u:I 8 ]~ ~ ~ #:1':::- 13< ;'::0 " §:u:I on I ''''1> i Ii ~ ~'=.!I J~! g¡~t~ ¡¡¡ '¡j ~ 0 If s u 1!1~:1 ~ J U 1)'; ·e i._;., Þï C> ~ .~ i .S IS~~]._ ~ ¡... '!.~ ~ð§"! .: .... C> .~ I] C>_ ÞS ..j! := :.: . ~ s fmlj~ j :S1 ð .- .¡¡ o:¡ ~i .Ifi II IE -l; J Jj j!G j' ~ =! 's, je. ]1 À I F'-.;;. ? _."..,,_.._._----_._,------~-_._-- -. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 1919 Meeting Date 2/07/95 ITEM TITLE: Report Regarding Landfill Disposal Services Agreement Between the city of Chula vista and the city of San Diego, SUBMITTED BY: Deputy City Manag~. eorge KremPI&~ REVIEWED BY: city Manage~'~ (4/Sths Vote: NO) ./? The purpose of this memo is to update Council on the proposal with the city of San Diego to dispose of Chula vista trash at Miramar Landfill until such time as a transfer station can be completed. The City of San Diego approved the agreement on December 6, 1994 by a vote of 8-0 with one member absent. The city of Chula vista had taken preliminary action on December 6, 1994 as weIl, with final action to have been considered following environmental review. RECOMMENDATION: Do not approve the agreement but rather place it on hold to be reconsidered in the future should County landfill rates be increased. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Resource Conservation commission approved the Negative Declaration on the Environmental Review, 4-0, on January 9, 1995. BACKGROUND: The agreement with San Diego had been negotiated for three reasons: 1. to realize an economic savings from rates being charged us by the San Diego County Waste Authority; 2. to stabilize our rates over the next 12-18 months while a transfer station is being pursued; and 3. to avoid being closed out of Otay Landfill and shipping our waste to the County's Sycamore Landfill. For information, Attachment A is a summary of the key points of the Agreement and Attachment B is the actual Draft Agreement language. DISCUSSION: The basic deal with San Diego was that we would pay a tip fee of $65/ton at Miramar Landfill plus take an equivalent quantity of their trash through our transfer station in the future. This "back-end" cost would be $9-12/ton, but obviously paid at a later point in time and conceivably folded into the transfer station tip fee. We would also have to pay the transport cost to Miramar from Chula vista. When we were paying the Authority $74/ton, facing the /?A~I -------~-~--~-_._~-~~~-_._--_._--_.__.,---_._---------..-.--- prospect of rates increasing to possibly $133/ton, as well as diversion from otay Landfill to Sycamore Landfill, the proposal from San Diego was in our best interest. Now I however I circumstances have changed, On January 18, 1995 the Board of Supervisors and the Authority reduced rates to a standard $55/ton for everyone effective February 1, 1995. They also committed to keep Otay Landfill open to the entire South Bay and spend the money necessary to complete the first phase of the required liner before the landfill capacity is reached, They also set goals to further reduce trip fees to $50/ton on 7/1/95, $45/ton on 1/1/96 and $40 on 7/1/96. In light of these actions I it is most economical right now to stay in the system and pay the County rate. Discussions regarding our transfer station proposal and other solid waste options is the subject of a companion agenda statement for this meeting. The city of San Diego has been advised and recognizes that while we both negotiated diligently and in good faith, that it would not be viable for Chula vista to execute the agreement at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: The current County rate effective February 1, 1995 is $55/ton, The cost associated with the San Diego proposal is an initial rate of $65/ton, Should San Diego increase its rate to its own customers by I say $5/ton in the future I then that rate would be passed through to Chula vista residents resulting in a rate of $70/ton. With regard to the added cost of accepting an equal quantity of South Bay San Diego waste through the transfer station I the cost is difficult to assess. Not knowing what the San Diego rate will be at the time the transfer station opens or the transfer station rate, it is not possible to objectively quantify the impact. However I the outside maximum risk is anticipated to be about $12/ton, or an additional $9/ton if the transfer station is not developed. Attachments: Attachment A Key provisions of the Draft Agreement Attachment B Memorandum of Understanding for Landfill Disposal Services Between city of San Diego and City of Chula vista If/9'c2. ___~__._..__~,_______._ ____.~._.__ ___"____,,___ _____·_____·'.'_m.."'.__._...._ ~._"__ "_~_...."___._ "__________._______.___.__~ ATTACHMENT A Key Provisions of the Draft Agreement 1. Beginning February 15, 1995 (revised from original start date of January 2, 1995), Chula Vista can dispose of up to 180/000 tons of trash over a 2-year period until January 1, 1997, or from the date Module 3 of the Miramar Landfill is able to accept trash. 2. Chula vista shall pay San Diego an tipping fee equal to the disposal fee San Diego collects for its own residential waste plus $32/ton, (San Diego's current residential rate is $33/ton + $32/ton = $65/ton. The $32/ton was the dollar amount requested by San Diego as a consideration for doing the deal. This surcharge will go directly into their General Fund with $10/ton allocated to their Refuse.Collector Business Tax and $22/ton allocated as a host fee/surcharge, The San Diego Solid Waste Authority has been charging Chula vista $74/ton since October 1, 1994.) 3. Chula vista is obligated to estimate and deliver a minimum tonnage quarterly or pay for the difference in any shortfall, For the two year period I the minimum tonnage shall be 160/000 tons or approximately 80,000 tons per year. 4, Chula vista agrees to accept South Bay San Diego trash through its transfer station once constructed I at an equal tonnage to that which was deposited at Miramar, This will ensure no actual loss of landfill space capacity, San Diego will pay Chula vista a tipping fee per ton for City of San Diego trash handled at the Chula vista Transfer station that is the lower of the Chula vista Transfer station's most favored (lowest) rate less $12 or the Landfill disposal fee plus $5, 1 /'fA';1 /1911-1 _._._..._..___.__~_.._____,__ _.M._.._.._________.__.____. ______ ______ _ __________~_·__n._·._._.___.____.___ ATTACHMENT B - - MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR LANDFILL DISPOSAL SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF SAN DIEGO AND CITY OF CHULA VISTA THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") is made between The City of San Diego, through Jack McGrory I its City Manager, and the city of Chula vista I through John D, Goss, its City Manager I as follows: 1. Effective Date. The parties agree that this MOU shall be effective when ratified by the City Councils of both The city of San Diego ("CSD") and the city of Chula vista ("CV") without modification. II. Term. The Term of this MOU shall mean the two-year period of time between January 2, 1995 and January 1, 1997 or from the date Module 3 of the Miramar Landfill ("Landfill") is able to accept trash and the second anniversary of that date I whichever is' later, A. The Term may be terminated earlier by either party on sixty (60) days advance written notice to the other party without cause. B, The Term may be suspended or terminated on twenty-four (24) hours notice by CSD in accordance with restrictions placed on the Landfill's operations by the Department of the Navy under the terms of the Grant of Easement for the Landfill. C. The Term may also be immediately suspended or terminated by CSD if required by an operational emergency, III. Acceptance of CV Trash at Landfill, A, CV Trash. For the purposes of this MOU, "CV Trash" shall mean mixed municipal solid waste lawfully permitted to be disposed of in a Class III landfill generated from residential; commercial I industrial I or governmental/institutional sources located within the corporate limits of CV, or such mixed municipal solid wastes from sources sponsored by CV with the prior approval of CSD, I /9~-5 -------_._-,----~-_._._---,-.._~-_._.,.."._- __·_·.___.m....~__·.__."_.·.·_ ---_._-_..~----"- B. Procedural Matters. 1. CV shall designate a sign I logo or other code I acceptable to CSD, that shall identify vehicles carrying exclusively cv Trash or other identification that can be presented to the Disposal site Representative to identify the vehicle as carrying exclusively CV Trash. 2, CSD shall provide CV with periodic reports on the tonnages of CV Trash accepted for disposal at the Landfill. These reports will be forwarded to CV fifteen (15) days following the end of each twenty- eight day billing period. 3. Haulers of CV Trash shall establish a Deferred Payment Account and be billed in the same manner and timeframes as CSD Deferred Payment Account Holders. There shall be thirteen (13) twenty-eight (28) day billing periods per year and payment in full shall be due and payable fourteen (14) days from the date of the invoice. A late penalty of 10% of the invoice amount or $50, whichever is greater I shall be assessed on all late payments, C. Maximum Tonnage Acceptable. CSD will accept a maximum of 180/000 tons of CV Trash for disposal at the Landfill during the Term of this MOU at a rate of approximately 90,000 tons per year, CSD may refuse to accept tonnages of CV Trash at a rate greater than 20% above the projected quarterly minimum tonnage during any single quarter. D. Minimum Tonnage Required, CV shall tender a minimum of 160/000 tons of CV Trash for disposal at the Landfill during the Term of this MOV at a rate of approximately 80,000 tons per year. CV shall provide a quarterly projection of the minimum tonnage of CV Trash to be delivered during the ensuing quarter at least 60 days prior to the commencement of each quarter (January 2, April 2, July 2, and october 2), CV shall tender its quarterly projected minimum tonnage of CV Trash or pay the current tipping fee specified in this MOU for the difference between the actual tonnage of CV Trash delivered and the projected quarterly minimum tonnage. If the early termination provisions provided in section II are exercised by CSD, the minimum tonnage requirements for that quarter shall not apply, If the early termination provision provided in section II A, is exercised by CV, the minimum tonnage requirement for the 2 1119 -¿, _..___.m____~_______.._.___ _ ________n___.._______ ..._ ____.._... . _~_._ ..___~.._._..._________.._____._____.______ quarter in which the early termination is effective shall apply, IV. Landfill Disposal (Tipping) Fee. CV shall pay CSD a tipping fee equal to CSD I S landfill disposal fee for CSD collected residential waste plus $32 per ton for each ton of CV Trash disposed of in the Landfill. At the effective date of this MOU, the tipping fee shall be sixty-five dollars ($65) per ton, This thirty-two dollar ($32) per ton surcharge shall include the Refuse Collector Business Tax required by the San Diego Municipal Code ("SDMC") section 32,0306, The tipping fee so determined and paid by CV shall be distributed to such accounts and in such proportions as CSD shall, from time to time I designate at its sole discretion. In addition, all haulers of CV Trash shall be subject to all rules and regulations for the collection I transportation and disposal of waste within CSD as provided in the SDMC, Waste Management Regulations issued by the City Manager and the current Landfill Disposal Fee Schedule. This includes all licensing I special handling, administrative and special fees and charges which are not included in the base landfill disposal fee. V, Acceptance of CSD Trash at CV Transfer station. If a transfer station is constructed by or for CV ("CV Transfer Station") and is operational not later than one year after the full Term of this MOU ("Three Year point")I and the operation thereof is commenced and continued I CV agrees to accept I or require its operator to accept tenders of deposits of CSD trash I lawfully permitted to be disposed of in a Class III landfill, generated in areas of CSD located south of SR 54 ("CSD Trash") up to the actual tonnage of CV Trash disposed of at the Landfill under the authority of this MOU ("Displacement Capacity Tonnage"). CSD shall pay CV a tipping fee per ton for CSD Trash handled at the CV Transfer Station that is the lower of the CV Transfer station's most favored (Lowest) rate less $12 or the Landfill disposal fee plus $5, By way of example I if the lowest rate at the CV Transfer station is $60 per ton, and the Landfill disposal fee for CSD collected waste is $40 per ton I the disposal fee for the deposit of CSD Trash at the CV Transfer station shall be the lower of $60 - $12 = $48 or $40 + $5 = $45 per ton, VI, Payment for Displaced Capacity, If, by the Three Year Point I the CV Transfer Station is not operational and able to accept CSD trash I and CV does not otherwise arrange for the disposal of CSD trash I at a location acceptable to CSD, in the amount of the Capacity Displacement Tonnage at the then existing Landfill disposal fee, CV shall 3 /9/1- 7 - ,________ ,__.._._._,_...._._._..,._......___..____ ..~_ M~_'_._...'._'_..._·__.___ _ ._._._".___..___._____~_.,__.___.____._______.~_____._______ pay to the CSD Waste Management Enterprise Fundi not later than 12 months after the Three Year Point, $9 per ton for each ton of the Capacity Displacement Tonnage not otherwise handled by CV, VII. Indemnification Clause, Each party agrees to defend I indemnify I protect and hold the other I its agents I officers I and employees harmless from and against any and all claims asserted or liability established for such party's employees I agents I or officers I which arise out of or in any manner directly or indirectly connected with the work to be performed under the MOU as it relates to the disposal of trash by one party through its respective facility or other means I and all expenses of investigating and defending against the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I having read the terms and conditions hereto I this MOU is executed by the city of San Diego, acting by and through its City Manager I and by the City of Chula Vista I acting by and through its City Manager, Dated: I 1995 Jack McGrory I City Manager City of San Diego I HEREBY APPROVE the form and legality of the foregoing MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING this day of I 1995, John W. Witt, City Attorney By Elmer L. Heap, Jr, Deputy City Attorney Dated: I 1995 John D, Goss, City Manager city of Chula Vista Approved as to form: Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney 4 /9/7 - g/ --_._----_.__._--_.._--_._-~~-~~_._-". ._""_._._.._-~---~---------- - ---'.-,..--.---... COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. /18 Meetinq Date 2/7/95 ITEM TITLE: Report - Ongoing strategy with Regard to Solid Waste Disposal options and Tr~sfer station ."""ED.Yo Deputy City Manage~Pl& I Principal Management A sistant Snyder REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ 4/5ths Vote: No The purpose of this report is to vi;'; progress on the development of a solid waste transfer station I assess current options in light of recent events I and request further Council direction, The advantages and disadvantages of the following three options are discussed: put all actions on hold indefinitely; continue with current plans for first phase of the transfer station (site, design and permitting only) I or allow private contractor to proceed independently at this time, (See Attachment A.) RECOMMENDATION: continue with current Council direction to site, design and permit a solid waste transfer station. Additionally I direct staff to: 1. Monitor county progress towards reducing costs and landfill rates; 2. Pursue additional information on other viable alternatives such as a "pod" truck system; and 3. Provide Council with a monthly written status report on expenditure obligations incurred as a result of the transfer station development. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N.A. DISCUSSION: Status Report on the Transfer station Development The City has been actively discussing solid waste disposal options over the past 16 months. Although Council has been receiving weekly oral status reports on solid waste issues for over a year, a brief chronology of the events related to the transfer station development is included as Attachment B. To summarize the current direction I the City entered into a contract with Sexton Sand & Gravel to design and permit a transfer station about four months ago (as a result of a competitive proposal process) I and is close to selecting and presenting a purchase agreement option for a trànsfer station site. /9ß ~/ --,~.~~-"---~--_..- . --'-".. .-.--.-.......-.....--.-..-......--.-...--...- - - --~--_.._--_.._--_.__._.._~----~._,------- Once final site selection occurs, the project can move forward with actual facility design, as well as discretionary land use and solid waste facility permits, The process has been planned as the first phase of development, Decisions to construct and operate I as well as a destination disposal site, have been planned to constitute the next phase of development. The phasing was recommended as the process which would allow the City as much flexibility as possible to remain responsive to rapidly changing conditions. To date, the City has spent $65,878 for solid waste consultant services from Brown I Vence and Associates (BVA) . Most of those expenditures were for preparation of the RFP and analysis of the proposals. At this point in the Sexton contract I the City is obligated to pay them and their consultants $16/000 if the transfer station process is terminated. (See Attachment C for detail on expenditures,) Relationship of This proiect to Reqional Events At different times over the past few years I various parties have placed demands upon the City with regard decisions about the handling and disposal of our solid waste. In 1993, the City was given an option to either join an Interim Solid Waste commission or incur higher landfill tip fees for waste from Chula vista through a surcharge. We did eventually join under protest and began litigation which was dropped when the Interim commission convinced all cities in the region to join for a temporary period of time. At the conclusion of Interim commission's tenure in May 1994, the San Diego Solid Waste Authority was formed and the City was faced with the decision to either join or suffer the consequences I the threat of higher rates. We didn't join. The Authority was formed with seven cities and the County I but ten cities stayed out. The ten non-member cities were then requested to either execute one of three "long-term" contract proposals with the Authority I join the Authority or pay a much higher "day rate," The day rate was originally pegged at $234jton by a consultant I reduced to up to $133jton, and finally set at $74jton as of October 1, 1994, Authority members were only paying $55jton, No non-member cities signed contracts with the Authority. A lawsuit was filed by all ten non-member cities regarding the differential rate structure which is still pending. The ten non-member cities account for 60% of the region's waste (excluding the City of San Diego), Because of the situation, three of the non-member cities have stopped using the system altogether by shipping their waste outside of the County - EI Cajon, Oceanside and Carlsbad, Other non-member cities have either begun developing transfer stations or been actively working on alternative transport and disposal opportunities with their haulers. 2 19lJ...2. ~_____.._ _______~_.__.________._~.~..._____.___.__,...________.__.__.'___ __'m'__ - .-...-.-....-...----..---..---.-.-..--.----..---- The system's budget problems have been seriously exacerbated by the documented exit of waste from the County. The Dotential exit of additional waste could be catastrophic. When local cities are not sending their waste to the County system I in addition to losing revenue I the system also loses the ability to use that money to pay for future costs such as the debt-service on the North County Resource and Recovery Associate's facility (NCRRA worth over $20 on a $55 tip fee) and closure/post-closure costs. In a desperate attempt to address this crisis, a "land use fee" (more accurately described as a parcel tax) was proposed by the Authority to the Board of Supervisors in November 1994. It would recover the NCRRA and certain closure/post-closure costs from property owners over a period of 20 years. Also, non-member cities in the South Bay were notified of the Authority's intent to restrict acceptance of waste at the otay Landfill to only Authority members effective 1/1/95 because of lack of funding to install a required liner system. Waste for Chula vista I Imperial Beach and Coronado would need to be hauled to the Sycamore Landfill near Santee at the ratepayers I additional expense. In partial response to these expected measures I Chula vista negotiated a short-term contract with the city of San Diego to haul waste to the Miramar Landfill for $65/ton while the transfer station development process takes place. (A companion agenda statement recommends that the agreement not be executed at this time since the differential rate will be dropped on 2/1/95 and the tip fee will be $55/ton to all users.) The parcel tax proposal was killed and the Board of Supervisors chose to fund the liner for the otay Landfill, assuring capacity to current users for up to two years. with the death of the parcel tax, the threat of Chula vista's waste leaving the system I change in the make-up of the Board of Supervisors and a change in direction by the Authority, different strategies are evolving. In facti when the County took action to eliminate the differential tipl the Board set goals to reduce the tip fee in $5 increments each six months until the fee reaches a competitive rate of $40/ton in July 1996. These actions make it prudent for the Council to revisit at this time the question of how, or if I the City might want to proceed with a transfer station. The "Short-Term Picture" for the city In the short term, the city 's best choice is to stay with the County system. As noted I the Board and the Authority are finally beginning to take steps to make their rates competitive. What will be crucial to their ability to achieve these goals is their ability to deal with the budget deficits created by setting artificially low rates at a time when the system requires higher rates in order 3 1'10-;1 __ _~~_~__"_'___'_'___'______'._.__.'_"_" M___._.._._.__________..____..___ ----~--- - - .--- -.- - -.....----- to be fully funded. A number of options are being discussed between the Board and the Authority I such as bonding I addressing the possible closing/restructuring the NCRRA agreement or a combination of both, Another short term option suggested by Laidlaw, the city's franchised hauler I is to use a "pod-type" system to truck waste long distance to the most cost-effective landfill outside of the County system. A "pod" system does not require a transfer station but does require special equipment I so the investment is made in the rolling stock rather than a permanent facility. A transfer station is likely to still be needed in the future in order to take advantage of more cost-effective transport and disposal options I as well as to address materials recovery needs. Laidlaw has been working with a manufacturer to produce its own "pod" type truck system I similar to the patented system being provided to the cities of El Cajon and Oceanside by their hauler, It has been suggested that Laidlaw might be able to haul waste to the landfill in the southern part of Orange county if the County reverses its ban on importation of waste, At this time, it is unknown if Laidlaw's proposal will be physically viable or what the cost and proposal terms would be. It would take six months or so to actually produce and deliver the equipment. This is an option staff continues to pursue. Lonq Term Options In the long term, the questions revolve around what the County ultimately can do and whether the city should continue to pursue a transfer station, either as a public facility or to let it be privately developed. Attachment A was designed to help focus the discussion on the following options by displaying all the known advantages and disadvantages of: 1. Putting all actions on hold indefinitely; 2, Continuing with Phase One of the development as is currently underway; or 3. Allowing Sexton to proceed independently with complete development, through construction and operation, Conclusions and Recommendations Staff supports continuation of the transfer station process I but suggests that the issue be revisited based on new information as it becomes available. Under this scenario I the decision would be looked at again before a commitment is made to purchase land and before moving into Phase Two which would require the negotiation of a contract to construct and operate. 4 /'/.J~' _.__..__.___._'..._____,.,___.__....__'.__..__...____."0.' . 0'" _.'_".___,',. -_..._---.-.-" ....-.....-.---.. In addition, the information needed for a decision as to public or private ownership can be developed over the next several months while the design and permit process is underway, staff is planning to bring forward a proposal to do an in-depth economic analysis of both scenarios. The fundamental decision to proceed with the first phase as planned is based on the belief that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. Permitting a transfer station/materials recovery facility (MRF) provides some "insurance" for the City and will place us in a better position to negotiate rates I take advantage of lower cost disposal options, meet AB 939 recycling objectives and respond should the Otay Landfill close in the future. The costs associated with this "insurance" are mitigated by Sexton's agreement to provide them "up front/" by phasing the project and by the opportunity that they will not be a direct City cost if the transfer station is built, If the facility becomes a private venture I the costs become Sexton's obligations. In a "worst case" scenario I direct out-of-pocket City costs could be eventually recovered through a surcharge on the solid waste system collection rates. It is also possible that a transfer station could become an integral component of a regional solid waste system in the future I although the Authority has recently dismissed any interest in such a proposal. Finally, there are revenue possibilities through host fees if the transfer station is developed in Chula vista. FISCAL IMPACT: The City has already paid BVA $65/878 for their consultant services to the city. The Sexton Contract allows an amount not-to-exceed $340,000 for the Phase One tasks of design and permitting a transfer station. Obligations to date are $16,000. Most of the contract dollars not yet spent are for time and materials services of sub-consultants of Sexton's to prosecute the design and permitting of the transfer station. Staff is vigilant with Sexton in deciding what services are needed at what points and at what cost services are incurred. In addition I no money has or will need to be paid to Sexton unless the transfer station process is terminated. Otherwise I the up- front costs are folded into the transfer station tip fee once under operation. It may also be possible to avoid these costs by turning the project back to Sexton as a private venture. That action would require negotiations I including a discussion of commitment of the city/s waste flow. 5 J?ß·..r /19ß-~ _ _ _~_.______.__....__._..___._._____, ,._"_..._"·_·.·_'__..M.'.'_~..__ _____,_ _._.__,~ ._"._. .. __ '" _~..". ..: ... '" o ' = ...", "" '" = "'..... 00 " j '" 0 > = ] :¡ -s ~ '" 0 00 -s~ .d....§ OS [S'" '" "'. ~ ¡¡ .~ 8 :;>os ¡a ='Ö o 0 ~ ~'" c:f"" ~.¡j 0 '" '" '" 0._ ~ 'p 8 0'" . .~.§ ~ ;¡:¡~ ~ 8 'p 8. c:f $ .~ 'g:; .¡¡ "".g ö '" '" c:f c:f '" ... 8 8.s"" . -s .d '" 8. ~ . ~ '" ø 0 .~ ã s ø '" oo"'o¡¡¡ '" ø '" ø '" 0 '" ~ Ë f 00 '" >, .~ ¡; ø '" '" ~ '+;2 ..... '" ø '" -E~g '.d8. 1!]1 8 &! _ "" oo",ø ~~ ~õ :a~:a ¡a = '" ... ø .i; :ã~= - = ,.Q~~ '" ~ '" . ø 0 ~i '" Vol ~~ !1. 8 à¡¡ '" ¡¡ ;: ø is g'g ~ .S oo'p . .g .S "'l;0 ø._ en cu"l:S c:I '" c:f :¡ 8 Q) VI as 0 B~ :;~;; ~ ij '" -s '" ii V, Q) '::I -s~;¡:¡ ...1-B ø '" o§", Þ8-SØ ... ... v '" ~~ ø,,,, ~ '" Þ -'" 1þ'" § "" c:f ... '" l; ö ~.1:J o~ ¡¡¡ ø " § S! 8·a 8 ~ "- '" ~ l; ~ "'¡¡~ 8 '" ~8~ ~~~~ ..:~ ¡:Js8. .... ¡¡; -'" 0 0 0 0 0 ø = ... 0 ..¿, 'p >, S! ~ ... ~ 'C -s ï¡ ø 0 o¡¡¡~[S .~~ ~ '" 13 '" '" .~ .; 1 '" ... § 0 8 "'....:; c:f " .S -S ¡a o 0 o 0 'p.d '" ~c,.c: .g 9 ":..s ~ ... ... ;¡: :a ":.-s o 0 ø .¡¡ "" !i $ ~~ ø.S '" 00 '" e'P ø 8", '" "'.~'" '" '" 8.s ·P... := ~'ii 00> oo~ 0 lª ~ s ... '" ... ",8 '" 00c:f 8~ ~:£ >'°Þ .~ .g M '" ~ ~ ø "'~ '[~ '" ¡; '" ""C . "" o¡¡¡ '" ~~ '" ""... '" ¡¡¡ 0 0 ~ ~ f;- .S", "" ~ -S 00", OO'C ~:¡ ø e ¡¡ ~ 00c:f :a;¡:¡ ..§ J!! = '" So" t~ þ[S 00 . 13": ~.~ 0 os ,ß 00 ~ '" , '" '" û ~ ,.., ... "'ËÞ "';:;: ¡¡¡ g'!; . ~ '" ='" 80S '" -= ~ "õø§ '" 00 ,g 8 .S .~ oS 0 ==8 oS .~ ... 0 0Þ:i ..: -='" o 0 ~.J:: Þ aJ ~::S.~ ... '" -S ... 0 0 :e ~ ~ .S~ li'o¡¡¡ ö-ß. ...'" oU-5 8. ~ § þQj '" ø . '" 6 s "'C . ...... '" -5 8. g>" v ¡¡¡ $ ~ ~~.~ = 'p ö ... -S -š . .S.9 B '" ::: ¡¡¡ 'd=... þ.a ø -š~ -S "" ... ~ i '" 0 "" ._ 00 :ã'P 'p 1:1.:a ·oo~ Ö ",'" '" o¡¡¡ = ø ~ = '" = ~ '" "'t1~ . ø 0 '" ~ s ¡a' 0 cd~ = :; 8.' ~ æ s ~.~ 1u >.' d >,0"" ",,0 "'::; 8 ... e'p o ~ as S '" '" ~·o~ o 0 B u QJ ~ (J .S l; '" -S::-S :Ec.SB Z v ø 0 0 0 0 0 0 _'" '" "'i:¡¡¡ 'õ ~ .d ø 6b = ¡¡ 8·- ø 0 l; "" rJ c:f -s='" 0 ,...; ø N 'p 'Ij, = 'Ij, .~.g -S "" o . 0 'B .Þ "".~ ~ '" 0 "'] """':1 'iã '" ·.§§8·ª = 'p ...", 8~~8. æ .S /9ß - ? -----_._--_._._-----------_._-~- ... ..- ..--- -. .-+-.----... _.._._----~_._-- ;> S' ~ ... :>.. Cf.I (1) ~ ~.1 '" g ~~ 0 . .. 0 ~ '" ~.. $" P. ... 0 ~.~ .. '" e-a ~ ~ '(' :>.. 0 0 ~ ~ ~ '" f: ",,:::I. . II> '" S. õi . "";> '" ... -. ('tI Ñ s.... 1:1,0.< . s:¡ o II> .. :>.. '" . II> n '< P. '" '" 0 e: g ... '" '" o õ &f I» n ¡¡ '" ... '" ª" '" '" 0 )- :::I. :>.. š' po e- ~ õi "" '" '" ...'" § ~ Q. '" '" S ",,,, :>..o':;¡ "" ~ '" n .. '" '" ª o :!i S' '" ~ ~. .. 0 n ¡Þ [ '" =- '" ~:>..e- § P.'" '" o~"Ø :>.. .. a 8 n ê::~' ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ _B. ~ ¡;: § :!i :>..o !4 §: '" :>.. '" '" 0 0 ""n;:E 8 ¡;! .. ~ 0 ¡¡¡a=- ~'" § ~. :>.. ~Q. íll3~ "'.:;¡ n '" ~ 0 :¡¡. §. ~r-tg" "''''' o::r-'" e-¡;¡;' =00.< '" - 0 s:a... '< 0 ~. '" '" '" I» .. e-"" a '" ~ It '" ~. ~. n :>..Q.'" ~g § "'~'I;f) cr§ S o 0 "" ",' a ¡Þ - '" '" æ '" 0 '" ;; .~ 16 og g.ª ... ... g."" I!\ [§g, '" '" . :>..6' § f,H :>.. '" i:I' ~ /fð·r ~----~~----~-_.~---~_._-.-~--_._-_._- ..' w_~.._~ .... ____._ __ ____ __~_'"._____..__~__,__ Attachment B CHRONOLOGY SOLI D WASTE TRANSFER STATION 9/21/93 City Council directed staff to proceed with an RFP for the procurement of solid waste management and disposal options. 12/16/93 City issued RFP for solid waste services as an alternative to the proposed JPA for a San Diego Waste Management Authority. 2/15/94 5 RFP responses received I 3 determined to be responsive: Laidlaw Waste systems I Inc" Mid-America and John Sexton Sand and Gravel/Chula vista Sanitary Services. 3/1/94 Brown I Vence & Associates (BVA) engaged as a consultant to assist staff in the RFP response evaluations, An economic evaluation with the then County Waste system was also prepared. 5/10/94 BVA evaluation and ranking shows the Sexton proposal to be the best one. 5/24/94 City Council directs staff to enter into contract negotiations with Sexton for the siting I design and permitting of a transfer station and materials recovery facility (MRF), 5/24/94 city Council decides not to become a member of the San Diego Waste Management Authority. This was in light of a May 31, 1994 deadline for signing the JPA agreement, Chula vista and nine other cities refused to sign due to very adverse contract terms and potentially significant liability including responsibility for North County Resource Recovery Facility (NCRRA), 6/7 /94 BVA contract approved by City Council to assist staff with Sexton contract negotiations. 7/19/94 City Council conceptually approved business terms for Sexton contract, 9/6/94 city staff evaluates 14 potential transit station sites. City Council directs staff to proceed with in-depth analysis of the three highest ranked sites, (894 Energy Way I 855 Maxwell Road and 900 Bay Blvd.) 9/16/94 Sexton contract agreement executed. 1913-' ---~,-~-~--"~._~~~-~-_.._.._._~,--~-----~ 10/1/95 San Diego Waste Management Authority starts charging non- member cities differential rate of $74/ton compared to member rates of $55/ton. A lawsuit ensued, 10/20/94 Public hearing (Forum) held by staff to get input on the transfer station sites. 11/8/94 City Council accepts report recommending that staff enter into negotiations with property owners of the two recommended sites and report back with a single site recommendation, The property negotiations have been underway and Council has received several briefings in closed session. 12/6/94 San Diego City Council approves an agreement with Chula Vista to allow the City to take its trash to Miramar landfill for $65/ton plus certain back-end costs to accept their waste through a transfer station and the additional haul cost to get to Miramar, 1/18/95 The Board of Supervisors and the Authority Agreed to take whatever steps are necessary to keep the otay Landfill open to all members and non-member cities. A system wide tip fee was set at $55 effective February 1, 1995, Goals were approved to reduce the tip fee to $50 by July, 1995, $45 by January 1, 1996 and $40 by July 1, 1996, )'1 g"/¿7 "._---_._"'---_.,--_."--~"_._---_._._--~. Attachment C SOLID WASTE TRANSFER STATION EXPENDITURES Expenditures for Solid Waste Consultant Services for Brown I Vence and Associates (BVA) Date Task Actual Amount Spent October 19, 1993 Assist in Developing $16/022 RFP March 1, 1994 Evaluation of RFP/s 24,839 and Economic Analysis May 10, 1994 Extension of 7/000 Contract for Ongoing Work June 7, 1994 Assist in Contract 18/017 Negotiations and Technical Support with Sexton TOTAL $65/8781 Expenditures Owed Sexton to Date Only if Transfer station Process Terminated (September 16, 1994 - January 1995) Not Yet Paid Management Fee $15/000 Out-of-Pocket Expenses 1.000 $16/0002 1Total of $103/850 appropriated, Most of the expenditures ($71/850) were made from the Solid Waste Trust Fund set up in FY 1991-92 from monies deposited by Laidlaw re rate setting settlement. The remaining appropriations ($32/000) were from the General Fund. 2The total Sexton contract cost is a not to exceed $340,000, with a $90,000 total fee to Sexton over 18 months and a not to exceed $250,000 fee for actual reimbursable consultant costs. The net fiscal impact to the City for the development of the transfer station is zero if the city continues the process and proceeds to actually construct the transfer station. Under this scenario I these costs would be absorbed within the charges assessed for the operation of the facility and passed on through the trash collection rates. )9lJ~// January 27, 1995 MEMO TO: The Honorable Mayor & City Council FROM: Patty wes~pf( SUBJECT: SANDAG BAYSHORE BIKEWAY POLICY COMMITTEE Our new Supervisor called this date requesting that the City of Chula Vista appoint a representative to serve on the above policy committee of SANDAG. The current membership consists of: Supervisor Cox, Mayor Herron, Council member Inzunza and a representative of the Imperial Beach City Council. Although this committee has been convening every other month on Wednesday at 12:00 noon, Supervisor Cox said the regular meeting date and time would be discussed once the committee is finalized. pw ø<-2.b·¡ _____m __ _______n___"_UO.___......__..·_. ...,____ --.-- - ____ ___.00.._.__----- ___,_._____.._~_..._._._.,__. BAYSHORE BIKEWAY FACT SHEET ~. Bikewav Historv The Bayshore Bikeway (formerly known as the Bay Route Bikeway) is a 26-mile bicycle facility around San Diego Bay. Planning for the Bikeway began in 1975 with a $24,500 feasibility study conducted by Caltrans. That plan envisioned 11.3 miles of bicycle paths and 14.2 miles of bike lanes and bike routes.' It also assumed that interim facilities would have to be designated on local streets for much of the route. In 1976, National City received a $50,000 Transportation Development Act (TDA) allocation to widen the Chollas Creek Bridge on Harbor Drive, the first project on the route. The following year, the Bay Route Bikeway Steering Committee was formed by the County of San Diego, and the cities of Coronado, Imperial Beach, Chula Vista, National City and San Diego. As a result oftheir efforts SB 283 was passed, providing approximately $1 million for construction of the Bikeway. By 1983, nearly $1.5 million in TDA and state funds were expended to construct portions of the Bikeway on the Silver Strand in Coronado and on Harbor Drive in the City of San Diego. The first connection between Coronado and San Diego was via bike racks attached to transit buses. In 1987, service on the San Diego-Coronado Ferry became available. The next major improvement came when the San Diego Port District constructed a bicycle path from Glorielta Boulevard, under the Coronado Bay Bridge and through Tidelands Park in Coronado. The Port District extended this path north to the Coronado Ferry Landing in 1993. Currently, approximately 9.5 miles of bicycle paths are in use on the Bikeway. The rest of the facility consists of on-street sections designated as either bicycle lanes or bicycle routes. Current Initiatives In 1989, the San Diego Association of Governments formed the Bayshore Bikeway Policy Advisory Committee to promote improvements to the Bikeway. The committee consists of an elected official from each city around the Bay, the County of San Diego, and one citizen representative. The 1993 extension of the Tidelands Park section of the Bikeway by the Port District was the first project constructed that the Committee promoted. The Committee has also in~iated two other important projects. These projects represent key links in the original bikeway plan that have never been constructed. Sweetwater River Crossing. The first project will provide a safe crossing of the Sweetwater River between Chula Vista and National City. The project, estimated to cost $4.2 miilion, will eliminate several sections of the current route where bicyclists must negotiate busy streets. It will bring the route back onto the Bay. At the request of SANDAG, Caltrans is preparing the environmental document and will undertake the design and construction. Preliminary designs call for a path along the western edge ofthe 1·5 right of way from Bay Boulevard and E Street in Chula Vista to the north levee ofthe Sweetwater River flood control channel where it wiil connect to an existing path along the channel. From there, the project wiil proceed west atop the levee to Colonel Pepper Park. and then to Tidelands Avenue in National City. Proiect Statistics Project Length 1.5 miles Project Schedule: Environmental Approval January 1995 Design Complete January 1996 Contract Awarded April, 1996 Construction Complete April, 1997 Estimated Cost $4.2 million Funding Sources: Federal CMAQ $2,472,500 Federal TEA 875,000 State 618,340 TransNet 250.000 Total $4,215,840 lCaltrans' Hiahwav Desian Manual designates three classes of bicycle facilities: Class I bike path consisting of a paved path within an exclusive right or way, Class II bike lanes consisting of signed and striped lanes within a street right of way, and Class III bike routes, which are preferred routes on existing streets, identified by signs only. cJ.:Lþ ~J -....--... --- ------~._--"---_.._._-----_.._---- ---- South Bay. The second major project, to be developed in two segments, will eliminate the current routing on city streets through Imperial Beach and San Diego at the southern most end of the route. The City of Imperial Beach will be extending the Silver Strand section of bike path eastward along the bayfront from 7th Street east to 13th Street in Imperial Beach. The project will be constructed within the old railroad right of way, and will eventually be part of a planned bayfront linear park. Proiect Statistics (Imperial Beach Section) Project Length 1.2 miles Project Schedule: Environmental Approval 1995 Design Complete 1996 Contract Awarded 1996 Construction Complete 1996 Estimated Cost $330,160 Funding Sources: TransNet $240,160 Transportation Development Act 81.000 Total $321,160 The second segment will extend the path from 13th Street to Bay Boulevard and Main Street in Chula Vista. The challenge for this section of the Bikeway is to find a route that is functional for bicyclists and also addresses environmental and private property concerns. The City of San Diego is lead agency for this section. An alignment on the levee just south and east of the railroad right of way is currently under consideration as a preferred alternative. Proiect Statistics (San Dieco Section) Project Length .98 miles Project Schedule To be determined Estimated Cost $523,500 Funding Sources: TransNet $100,000 Federal CMAQ 402,500 State 21.000 Total $523,500 For more information about the Bayshore Bikeway, contact Stephan Vance of SANDAG at 595-5324. old. b ., 'I _.0.., _'..~_.M____M_______··_·______·_· February 2, 1995 MEMO TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Patty wesp.ø~ SUBJECT: ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION TASK FORCE Linda Oravec, ADAPT Director, contacted our office requesting that a member of our Council be appointed to the ADAPT Board of Directors. Mayor Nader had served as our designee during his tenure on the Council. The ADAPT Board is comprised of elected officials from the assembly, superior, municipal and juvenile courts, cities, schools, college districts, hospital districts as well as law enforcement. The next ADAPT Board meeting is scheduled for Friday· February 17 - 12:00 noon at the Sheraton, 8110 Aero Drive. Attached is a partial list of the Board's accomplishments for the past several years. pw Encls. ;{J.c."¡ _ _____..______.,___~___________._.___~__ __ __ ___ __.___ _ __m _.._~__.__ .. _._'___ -0- .~.___...._._.,_..~._~_______. _._..._______ - -- .--. .- -- .- ...- --.- -- ...,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ADAPT ACCOMPL:J:S:HMENTS 93/94 To address vøderage dd.nkina part.ies, ADAPT hsist.ed cicy gove~nts in adopting "Second Call Ordil1&nces. It How, the County snd eight.een cit.ies bave such o~diDances. Jan, '94 Governor 1l1lson elgDed t.he ADAPT-proposed-aad-spoDJIored beer keg leg1s1atiol1 aiaed at. reducing teen keg psrt1.es. Now, persons t.1renty- one or older who provide keg part.ies for t.eens can be traced within tvanty-fcnn: hours .nd held account.able. Spring '94 ADAPT "-þers approved fo~t.ion of a Research, Developgent. and Evaluation Division headed by Gary Law.on, Ph.D., USIU. As its first. t.ask, t.he c~t.t.ee will &l:tempt to f1nd out why approximat.ely 100+ 1d1lioD dollar. received by San Diego County over t.he past. five years for alcohol aad sub.tuce abuse prevent.ion and treataent. baa not sub8t.ant.ially reduced abu.e and rel.ted crias and violence, Sept_ '94 Governor Wil.on signed AB 3053 draft.ed by ADAPT Kember Judge Laura øa..es in coneultat.iou. with a subc~ttee coaaistiDg of .chool principals, t.ru.tees and representatives of t.he just.ice sy.t.... Jan. '95 The ADAPT Justice Sy.t... c-:Lt.tee with as.1atance £1._ lav eø1orc...nt's D.A.a,E. Progr.. i. developing an in-service progr.. i for t.eachers focusing on 1) recognizing Itudent drug use, 2) dealing with such .t.udenU, and 3) options for referral, On- Other c~Dit.y~ide efforts by ADAPT to reduce t.he opport.unities going,. . for alcohol and substance abuse have been as follows: * ADAl'T-apoøored workshops for city council ..-Þers and city staffs to adopt Conditionsl Use Permit.s for the sale of alcohol. -- * ADAPT-spOll8ored workshops for business owuers and public iD.titutions to adopt Drug Pree Ilorkplace policiea. . ADAPT-spol18ored count.ywide alcohol .urvey for uae by local COllmDJnity-prevent.1on groups aa vell all local gove~t. -2 .2. t:. - 02.. - "._--~-.-..-_---