Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1995/03/14 ,<if '" declare tmrJer pena:ty of perjury thet I arrl employed by the City of Chu;a Vista in the Office of the City Cler!, and that I posted this Agenda/Notice on the Bullet;n Board at Tuesday, March 14, 1995 the Public 'iJ.ß-es Building a~on_.. Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Public Services Building DATED, J ,1.5' SIGNED ~ , Re2ular Meetin2 of the Citv of Chula Vista Citv Council CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Fox _, Moot _, Padilla _, Rindone _, and Mayor Horton - 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 7, 1995 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: None submitted. ***** Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now reconvene into open session to report any.fi!Y¡J actions taken in closed session and to adjourn the meeting. Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However, final actions reported will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office. ***** CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 6) The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green fonn to speak in favor of the staff recommentlation; complete the pink fonn to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that there were no observed reportable actions taken from the Closed Session of 3/7/95. It is recommended that the letter be received and filed. b. Letter requesting financial support to attend the National Youth Leadership Forum on Medicine in Boston, Massachusetts at Simons College from July 31, 1995 to August 10, 1995. Annette M. Austin, 744 Paseo del Rey, Chula Vista, CA 91910. It is recommended that the request be denied. ----j7·---..0' _._no _______ ~__..____ _______. . ___ __n___._u._a._ __ _ ___~~_ Agenda -2- March 14, 1995 c. Letter requesting financial support to cover basic rental expenses for the EastLake High School After-Prom on May 9, 1995 - Natasha Martinez, Co-chairman, EastLake High School After-Prom '95, 1031 Park Meadows Road, Cbula Vista, CA 91915. It is recommended that the request be denied. 6. RESOLUTION 17830 REJECTING LOWEST BIDDER AS NON-RESPONSIVE; ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF A TRACTOR LOADER WITH BACKHOE - On 1/18/95, bids were received for a tractor loader with backhoe for Public Works Operations. Staff recommends approval of the resolution awarding the bid to Bengal Equipment. (Director of Public Works) * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and{or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green fonn to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink fonn to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. * * * Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting * * * 7. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Fox _, Moot _, Padilla _, Rindone _, and Mayor Horton - Commissioners Fuller _, Martin _' Ray _, Salas _' Tarantino _. Willett _.and Chair Tuchscher _. 8. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: February 22.1995 9. PUBLIC HEARING GPA 95-01GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DESIGNATING 20-ACRE SATTERLA PARCEL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; GPA 95-02 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DESIGNATING 21.84-ACRE LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR OPEN SPACE; GPA 95-03 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DESIGNATING SAN DIEGO CITY WATER RESERVOIR, OTAY WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY AND OTAY LANDFILL AS PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC - In January of 1994, Council directed staff to prepare a Sphere of Influence Update Study for the City. That Study, along with several associated General Plan Amendments and a Second Tier PrograID ElR, are up for Planning Commission and Council consideration. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions. (Special Planning Projects Manager, Oby Ranch Project) COUNCIL CERTIFYING THE FINAL PROGRAM (SECOND TIER) ENVIRONMEN- RESOLUTION 17831 TAL IMPA'CT REPORT (FPEIR 94-03) FOR THE CITY OF CHULA AND PLANNING VISTA SPIIERE OF INFLUENCE PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE COMMISSION STUDY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE RESOLUTION EIR CALIFOID!lIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A 94-03 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, ADOPT- ING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AMEND- ING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, ACCEPTING THE DRAFT SPIIERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE STUDY AS AMENDED AND DIRECTING ITS SUBMITTAL TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR ADOPTION ._. "----.-..-..-..--------.......-.--.--..-....- ...-- -'~--'-- -~-...-_.._-"_.__..._-".__.._---_."._----_..--.__..._.__. ,--.-'-.- Agenda -3- March 14, 1995 · · * Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting will adjourn. * * . The Regular City Council Meeting will reconvene 10. PUBLIC HEARING PCC-95-16; REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN UNMANNED CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ON THE SITE OF THE OTAYWATER DISTRICT WATER TANK, LOCATED AT THE EASTERLY TERMINUS OF GOTHAM STREET - AIRTOUCH CELLULAR - AirTouch Cellular is requesting permission to construct an unmanned cellular communications facility at the southwest comer of the water tank parcel located at the easterly terminus of Gotham Street. Staff recommends the nublic hearilU! be continued to come back at a later date. (Director of Planning) Continued from the meeting of 2/14/95. 11. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF RATE INCREASE FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE - A temporary rate increase is being requested by Laidlaw Waste Systems to recover increased landfill disposal costs paid to the County from October 1994 through January 1995. This issue was first considered at a public hearing on 2/28/95 and continued until 3/7/95 pending additional information from the City Attorney regarding the impact of the recommended action upon the City's current legal action against the County to, among other things, seek reimbursement for differential rates paid during that period. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Deputy City Manager Krempl and Principal Management Assistant Snyder) Continued from the meeting of 3/7/95. RESOLUTION 17824 APPROVING RATE SCHEDULES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE EFFECTIVE 3/1/95 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State law, however, generally prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees. None submitted. - --..-~'-..--~._---.--- '-.--."-... - -_.~,.~------_._~----- .-.__._-_._._-----,-,-----, Agenda -4- March 14, 1995 ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak" fonn available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public comments are limited to five minutes. 12. RESOLUTION 17832 AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A POWER TO SAVE INCENTIVE AGREEMENT WITH SDG&E FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE I OF A COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY RETROFIT PROGRAM; ADDING GG149 ENERGY RETROFIT PHASE I TO THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATION OF $207,674 FROM THE GENERAL FUND A V AILABLE FUND BALANCE - On 9/7/93, Council directed staff to work with Jim Bell, Director of Ecological Life Systems Institute, to coordinate with his organization to conduct a cost-free walk through energy audit and to continue working with SDG&E in developing an energy retrofit package for City buildings. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Environmental Resource Manager and Director of Public Works) 4/5th's vote required. 13. RESOLUTION 17833 ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL POLICY FOR DELEGATING ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO STAFF AND THE SAFETY COMMISSION - Council has expressed a desire to have staff and the City Attorney work with the members of the Safety Commission in developing a process that would provide greater authority to staff and the Safety Commission in dealing with traffic safety issues. The intent of the policy is to eliminate the need for minor day-to-day issues related to the operations aspect of Traffic Engineering going before Council and have staff and the Safety Commission as the final decision-making authority. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 14. REPORT RELOCATION OF RESTROOM FACILITY IN MEMORIAL PARK - On 9/20/94, Council was presented with a petition signed by 108 residents of One Park Apartments who were objecting to the construction of new restrooms in Memorial Park being built near their complex. Parks and Recreation was directed to evaluate other sites within the park and have the Police Department review the proposed location for safety issues. Staff recommends Council accept the report, approve the construction of new restrooms at the existing location off of Park Way, and authorize staff to solicit a consultant to prepare necessary construction documents. (Director of Parks and Recreation) 15. REPORT UPDATE ON REGIONAL SEWER ISSUES - An oral report will be given by staff. --------~------ m_._. _.____. ".... _ _._....m...._. ______m '_____ _.._ . -_._._.._-~-- ------------,--,.._-,-_.- .-----,----- Agenda -5- March 14, 1995 ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the Ci~ Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items pulled at the request of the plÚllic will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers. Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual. OTHER BUSINESS 16. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTlS) a. Scheduling of meetings. 17. MAYOR'S REPORT IS) a. Aff,0intment of Jud~ Schulenberg to the Citizen at Large seat and Susan Fuller to the Volunteers o IC seat on the ayfront Conservancy Trust Board of Directors. b. A'd'roval of the renovation and installation of security measures for the Mayor and Council offices an approval of acquisition of furniture for same. 18. COUNCIL COMMENTS CouncÎlmember Rindone a. Bud~et Process: (1) Eliminate practice of funding non-specific encumbrances from rcrevious year s budget; and (2) Establish procedures for authorizing expenditures from Mayor Council annual budget. Continued from the meeting of 2/28/95. ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on March 21, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. "'>Ie"''''''' CLOSED SESSION Unless the Ciry Attorney, the City Manager, or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will discuss and deliberate on the {ollowing items of business which are pennitled by law to be the su~ect of a closed session discussion, and whic the Council is advised should be dIscussed in closed session to est Æ:otect the interests of the City. The Council is required bJllaw to return to o¡:.en session, issue any reports of nal action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to t e typical length of time taken up y closed sessions, the videotaping will be tenninated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session, ref.0rts ó£ ff.nal action taken, and adjournment will not be videotfi.ed. Nevertheless, the report of final action ta en wi I e recorded in the minutes which will be available in t e City Clerk's Office. 19. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING: 1. Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 · City of Chula Vista vs. the County of San Diego regarding approval of a major use permit for Daley Rock Quarry. 2. Anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 · Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: 1. · Metro Sewer Adjustment Billing (water reclamation and expansion costs). · Claim of Marcial Zendejas, Mercedes Zendejas, Antonio Pacheco and Maria Pacheco. Agenda -6- March 14, 1995 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 . ~ency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, Executive Management, Mid- anagement, and Unrepresented. Employee ~anization: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) and Western Council of Engineers CE). Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. 20. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION ..-...-------.'-.- --.---.....- --- -_..__..__._._._---_._,-,_..._._,~_..-.. -- --------+----- --_.._.._._-_.._~_.._. --.'-...-..-...-.~-.---_. March 8, 1995 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: John D. Gooo. city M.n.qor~~~ SUBJECT: City Council Meeting of March 1 , 1995 This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting of Tuesday, March 14, 1995. Comments regarding the written Communications are as follows: 5a. This is a letter from the city Attorney stating that there were no observed reportable actions taken at the Closed Session on 3/07/95. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED. 5b. This is a letter from Annette M. Austin requesting financial support to attend the National Youth Leadership Forum on Medicine in Boston. This request does not meet the criteria for funding individuals as stated in Council Policy 159-02. Therefore, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT MS. AUSTIN'S REQUEST BE DENIED. 5c. This is a letter from the EastLake High School After-Prom 1995 Committee, requesting financial support to cover rental expenses. This request does not meet the criteria for funding organizations as stated in Council Policy 159-02. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS REQUEST BE DENIED. JDG:mab - - ---."-.----.-.--- "_.._.__..._--_._----~,~----~-_...._..__._, --,_. .--.. _......_.,.,_..._~-~--_.- .-...--_.'-~---- -. --.---_._._---_._._..~~- ~{ft- =~--~ ~~~~ ClW OF CHULA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Date: March 8, 1995 To: The Honorable Mayor and City council From: Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney~ Re: Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session for the Meeting of 3/7/95 The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of my knowledge from observance of actions taken in the Closed Session, that there were no actions taken in the Closed Session of 3/7/95 which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. BMB:lgk C:\lt\clossess.no 5a~/ 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5037 -- -.-- -_..,._--_.,.,-- - /"-:;- :., co .w '..''',j I{) 1-<..) I' -1 C <1>- - _u.. >u.. Lù ¡æ ....:0 FEß ? I > 'i' -i(/) ,-- - =- I February 16,1995 Lù x:.o:: L <->ffi " I ~Õ I I.LI \- ..., ......,,~,..- .~..-..- '.,-. Annette M, Austin a:: >->- iR. B6 744 Paseo del Rey Chula Vista, CA, 91910 Mayor Shirley Horton 276 4th Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Horton, My name is Annette Austin and I am a junior at Hilltop High SchooL I am very interested in becoming a physician and have been invited to attend the National Youth Leadership Forum on Medicine this summer, This program se1ects very few students and is based on academic, citizenship and leadership excellence. With my 4,2 grade point average and ranking third in my class, I was honored to be chosen for this successful program, The National Youth Leadership Forum on Medicine is an eleven day program that will introduce me to some of the top individuals and organizations in the field of medicine today. During the forum, other students and I will attend seminars and conferences concentrating on issues concerning: Primary care, New Tools for a Cure, Medical Ethics, Hope for America's Future, Medicine making the News, Conquering Cancer through Medical Research and many other areas involved in the medical field, My program will be held in Boston, Massachusetts at Simons College, July 31 -. August 10. My costs to attend the forum are $1,465 for the forum tuition, plus $500 for the transportation fee. This expense is hard for me to raise myself due to the fact that my father is now being laid offfTom work and my mother is on work man's compensatioR It is my hope that you and your organization would be able assist me in raising the costs of this trip. By attending this conference, I will be beginning the dream and success of my future that I have been always hoping for, Any donation will be needed and greatly appreciated, The deadline for payment to be received by the J\'~tional Youth Leadership Forum is no latter than March IS, 1995, I would very much like the opportunity to meet with you to discuss my proposaL I will contact you within the next week to arrange an interview and to follow up on the progress of my letter, I can be reached at your convenience at (619) 421 - 9873. Thank you for your time I look forward to speaking with you. Sincerely, Wi.fl..fit/,; 1íl t?ud:tFV -:flr..(,,) Annette M Austin C-C-.' , ~~II"rTEN COMMUNICA 110'''5 ~~~ ¿h 3//11/95 5Þ~/ _~__.~__.. _'-'_~_'__'__~__~_'__""____'M''''________''_~_'_'___~__ --"- t --·-1 "''', : . , , i .ðÀ~-.í1ÀX}! }]]åþJ ~©}J@©1. }:¡Fl:, ~ ø1 2J 00 I T r- "T1 (") Ms. Shirley Horton, Mayor mo :::IP::c: ~ T City of Chula Vista :>O::c - (J'}r' < 276 Fourth Avenue 0>- ;a T "T1<: Chula Vista, California 91910 ...,- - 0 Febr~1 0, iÎJ5 Dear Ms. Horton, -.. As Eastlake High School prepares to graduate its first class of seniors, a steering committee of students, teachers, and parents has met to set the tradition of providing an after-prom event for the graduating classes. Throughout the nation parents and community members at large have put together their efforts and energy in providing safe, drug-free activities for their seniors after prom as alternatives to other kinds of happenings which all too frequently end up being dangerous, risky, and illegal. As a community concemed about the future of our youth and the temptations they face, we feel it is our shared obligation to offer them safe alternatives. Our plan at Eastlake High is to have an after-prom San Diego Harbor Cruise which will run from 1 :00 -6:00 a.m. immediately following prom on May 19th. On board, we will have dancing, karaoke, casino-type games with an auction for spending the "winnings," and non-stop food. We hope to collect door prizes, gift certificates, and auction items from local businesses as well as through our parents. As we tackle the challenges of coordinating such a project, we need to look to our community for support which is why we are writing you! In order to keep ticket costs to a minimum, which will assure that most of the seniors can attend, we must look to corporate and business financial support, particularly in this first year. It is our hope to secure "seed money" of $3,000.00 to cover basic rental expenses. With this start-up money we can assure that we will offer an exciting, memorable evening and that the tradition will be carried on in future years. We hope that the City of Chula Vista will be able to support this project. We know that all of you are concerned with the safety and future of our local kids and look forward to your help. Please give me a call If I can answer any questions or provide any more information. Thank you in advance for your help and support. - C¿': < N asha Martinez Co-chairman, EHS After-Prom '95 482-4271 ]]:3!J:¡ @I!J~ R>J!J(\ ~JJ:!JJ!J I'i}JI§ ~!J, ©!J]!\I(¡J~!i}!¡¡¡ i;)~@~1; ____.___~_._, __,________________n _______.__ Hem # t ~!f?. :-...~-~ ....:=:- --:;: CIlY OF CHULA VISTA MEMORANDUM March 9, 1995 TO The Honorable Mayor and City counci~ VIA . John D. Goss, City Manager ~ VCJ ~ FROM John Lippitt, Director of Public Works fJ/ Þt 71 L SUBJECT Item #6 - Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Purchase of a Tractor Loader with Backhoe The purpose of this memo is to advise Council that Kenneth Birch of Contractor's Equipment Company may attend the March 14, 1995 Council meeting in objection to staff's recommendation to award the bid for the purchase of a tractor loader with backhoe to Bengal Equipment and to reject the alternate bid from Contractor's Equipment Company. Council should be aware that the proposal from Contractor's Equipment Company for this equipment is not considered the lowest responsible bid for the reasons outlined in the attached agenda statement. Staff has discussed this issue with Mr. Birch on several occasions, however, he continues to disagree with staff's recommendation. ~-a --~______..._ __ .___...... __._.._._.___._.____.,______~______ __ _,_.___ __._·M__.m__.._________ COUNCn.. AGENDA STATEMENT Item~ Meeting Date 3/14/95 ITEM TITLE: Resolution I 'J 8'.30 Rejecting lowest bidder as non-responsive; accepting bids and awarding contract for purchase of a tractor loader with backhoe SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public worksl/pt- Ð;""", of Fmw," /~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ '() (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..XJ /1, Bids were received and opened at 3:00 pm on January 18, 1995 in the office of the Purchasing Agent for a tractor loader with backhoe for Public Works Operations. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution accepting bids and awarding contract for the purchase of a tractor loader with backhoe to the lowest responsible bidder, Bengal Equipment. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The FY 94-95 equipment replacement budget provides for the replacement of a tractor loader with backhoe. The bid packages were mailed to vendors in San Diego County with four (4) responding and one (1) of the four bidders providing an unsolicited alternative bid. The following is a summary of bids received: Tractor Loader with Backhoe Bidder Unit Price 7% Sales Tax Trade-in Net Amount Allowance Bengal Eqnipment, El Cajon 1995 JCB215 $51,696,00 $3,618.72 $10,000,00 $45,314.72 Hawthorne Machinery, San Diego 1995 CateIpillar 426B $60,915.00 $4,264.05 $15,000.00 $50,179,05 Contractors Equipment Co, Escondido 1995 Case 590 Super L $60,7mOO $4,249,70 $14,480.00 $50,479.00 Alternative Bid' 1995 Case 580 Super L $54,290.00 $3,800.30 $14,480.00 $43,610.30 (does not meet specifications) Whitney Machinery, San Diego 1995 Jolm Deere 410D $59,300,00 $4,15LOO $12,000,00 $51,45LOO ¿-I .'. - - .-- ~----__._._ ...... ,..___.___.___...~__,_...._.__._. ___._n_______n_____ ..,....._..____ .._ .u.._ __._~___ -.,.-..--- --·····0..·.._-···.···,--. Page 2, Item (, Meeting Date 3/14/95 The net low bid of Bengal Equipment Company meets specifications and is acceptable. The following tractor loader with backhoe will be traded in upon purchase: 1986 Case 680 Backhoe with combination bucket, property tag #15138. When the bid package was distributed by Purchasing, a call was received from the vendor bidding the Case backhoe. They had two backhoes, one above our specifications and the other slightly below our specifications, They were invited to bid both, as long as both met minimum specifications. The lower cost Case backhoe (Case 580) did not fully meet specifications as follows: 1. Slightly underweight; 2. A small capacity loader bucket; 3. Slightly less lift capacity of the 4: I loader bucket; and 4, A 1'3" less maximum dig depth Although the difference in dig depth is not critical due to the City's possession of a large excavator, staff does not believe it would be equitable to award the bid for the Case 580 since the other bidders could also bid alternate machines that would not meet the published specifications. Staff recommends that Council award the bid to Bengal Equipment for the JCB 215, However, if Council wishes to award for a smaller machine, staff recommends that new specifications be issued and the item rebid, This is said with the knowledge that Bengal Equipment has a smaller machine (JCB 214) than the JCB 215, which is $6,000 less than the JCB 215, ALTERNATIVE FUEL: Due to its size, weight, and continuous all day operation, this vehicle is not appropriate for consideration of conversion to alternative fuel. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds are provided in the FY 94-95 equipment replacement budget for purchase of the tractor loader with backhoe. The total amount of the tractor including the 7% sales tax and the trade in allowance is $45,314,72, The total amount budgeted for the purchase is $71,228 resulting in a savings of $25,913.28. The existing tractor loader with backhoe has a current maintenance cost of $11,004 and operating cost of $886, We estimate the on-going maintenance cost will drop significantly over the first five years while the operating cost will remain the same. The savings will be reflected in equipment maintenance charges to Public Works Operations Streets Operations account 100-1440-5269, File: L Y -013 IQ:sb m:\home\engineer\agenda\tractor .db2 tr~ -------~----_.._-----,--- --------..---..------'.-..-.-'....--.".--.--...--..------.. RESOLUTION NO. )? 1iJ 3d RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF A TRACTOR LOADER WITH BACKHOE WHEREAS, the following four bids were received and opened at 3:00 p.m. on January 18, 1995 in the office of the Purchasing Agent for a tractor loader with backhoe for Public Works Operations: Bidder Unit Price 7 % Sales Tax Trade-in Net Amount Allowance Bengal Eqnipment, El Cajon 1995 JCB215 $51,696.00 $3,618.72 $10,000.00 $45,314.72 Hawthorne Machinery, San Diego 1995 Caterpillar 426B $60,915.00 $4,264.05 $15,000.00 $50,179.05 Contractors Equipment Co, Escondido 1995 Case 590 Super L $60,710.00 $4,249.70 $14,480.00 $50,479.00 Alternative Bid: 1995 Case 580 Super L $54,290.00 $3,800.30 $14,480.00 $43,610.30 (does not meet specifications) Whitney Machinery, San Diego 1995 John Deere 410D $59,300.00 $4,151.00 $12,000.00 $51,451.00 WHEREAS, the net low bid of Bengal Equipment Company meets specifications and is acceptable and the following tractor loader with backhoe will be traded in upon purchase: 1986 Case 680 Backhoe with combination bucket, property tag #15138; and WHEREAS, since everyone has gone through the bidding process in good faith, and given their bid prices, it is recommended that we accept the low bid for a unit that meets specifications, and award the bid to Bengal Equipment of El Cajon. NOW, THEREFORE, the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows: section 1. That the City Council does hereby reject Contractors Equipment Co. 1995 Case 580 Super L bid as non- responsive for weight and depth. = 1 ,'J . --.----. - "~--_.._~._----,._._-----_..._._- Section 2. That the City Council does hereby accept the bid of Bengal Equipment as responsive. section 3. The City Council awards the contract for purchase of a tractor loader with backhoe to Bengal Equipment in the amount of $45,314.72, the lowest responsible bidder which submitted a responsive bid to the approved specifications. section 4. The Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista. Presented by t ~ Robert Powell, Director of Boogaar , C'ty Finance C:\rs\backhoe.bid 2 b'f "._.__ _ ....._.~. ______,____ . '._ ..n_·"_"_'_,.__~__~___, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item -.!l Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: GPA 95-01 DESIGNATING 20-ACRE SATTERLA PARCEL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; GPA 95-02 DESIGNATING 21.84-ACRE LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR PARCELS OPEN SPACE; GPA 95-03 DESIGNATING SAN DIEGO CITY WATER RESERVOIR, OTAY WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY AND OTAY LANDFILL AS PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC ~ Resolution £1. TIFYING TIffi FINAL PROGRAM (SECOND TIER) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR 94-03) FOR TIffi CITY OF CHULA VISTA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE STUDY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO TIffi CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AMENDING TIffi GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, ACCEPTING TIffi DRAFT SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE STUDY AS AMENDED AND DIRECTING ITS SUBMITTAL TO TIffi LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CO:MMISSION Sp,,", PWmffig Pn;"', -.".. Dœy """" ~Q ,-' SUBMITIED BY: REVIEWED BY: CityManageç)ó.~~ (4/5Vote:Yes_No~ In January of 1994, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Sphere of Influence Update Study for the City. This public hearing is being held jointly between the City Council and the Planning Commission to consider certifying the Final Program (Second Tier) Environmental Impact Report for the City of Chula Vista Sphere of Influence Update Study making certain Findings of Fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Rfl0rting Program, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, amending the General Plan Lari Use Element to comply with LAFCO policy, accepting the Draft Sphere of Influence Update Study as amended and directing that the Study be submitted to LAFCO for adoption, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission: Conduct the Public Hearing on the General Plan Amendments and Sphere of Influence Update Study, close the public hearing and adopt Resolution No. EIR 94-03 certifYing Final Program (Second Tier) 9-/ --".- . --....-".-. -"--.."--..-,,. _._._-_.._~,,----- Page 2 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 EIR 94-03 making certain Findings of Fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations and recommend the City Council amend the General Plan, accept the Sphere of Influence Update Study as amended and direct staff to submit the Sphere ofInfluence Update Study to the Local Agency Fonnation Commission for adoption It is recommended that the City Council: Conduct the Public Hearing on the General Plan Amendments, and Sphere of Influence Update Study, close the public hearing and adopt Resolution No,_ amending the General Plan, certifYing Final Program (Second Tier) EIR 94-03 making certain Findings of Fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations and accepting the Sphere of Influence Update Study as amended and directing staff to submit the Sphere of Influence Update Study to the Local Agency Fonnation Commission for adoption. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION Resource Conservation Commission: The Resource ConseIVation Commission (RCC) unanimously recommended that the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (DPEIR 94-03) for the City of Chula Vista Sphere of Influence Update Study be certified as being complete. The RCC minutes ITom their Februa¡y 16, 1995 meeting are attached for your information, Planning Commission: Since this is a joint hearing with the Planning Commission, their recommendation will be presented at the meeting. The Commission held a public hearing on Februa¡y 22, 1995 to take testimony on the Draft Program EIR. They unanimously voted to close that hearing and direct staff to prepare the Final Program EIR that is before the Council and Commission for certification. DISCUSSION L BACKGROUND The City of Chula Vista's initial Sphere of Influence was adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) in 1985. At that time, the Otay Valley Parcel was designated a Special Study Area pending the joint planning effort between City ofChula Vista and County, In July 1993, LAFCO authorized the Executive Officer to conduct an update study of the City of Chula Vista's Sphere of Influence in anticipation of completion of the joint planning effort on the Otay Ranch General Plan, The Otay Ranch General Development Plan/Subregional Plan (GDP/SRP) was adopted in October 1993. A Study Area for the Chula Vista Sphere of Influence Update was approved by the Chula Vista City Council in Janua¡y 1994. It encompasses the existing City ofChula Vista Sphere of Influence and approximately 13,616 additional acres. The Sphere of Influence Study Area as indicated in Exhibit 1 is generally bounded by Heritage Road and the existing City limits on the west, Brown Field on the south, the Jamul Mountains on the east and San Miguel Mountain on the north. 9~..2 .-.------._.~--- Page 3 Meeting Date: March 14.1995 The Sphere of Influence Update Study has been prepared by the City ofChula Vista to identifY the area within which urban levels of development could commence within the next 15 years, The focus of the Sphere Update Study has largely been the Otay Ranch and adjacent parcels. Three General Plan Amendments (GPAs) are proposed on five different property ownerships concurrently with the Sphere of Influence Update. The GP As are proposed for two reasons, Presently, some smaller non-Otay Ranch parcels are not included in the current City General Plan area. These parcels must be included in the Chula Vista General Plan in order to comply with the LAFCO policy requiring a Sphere area to be within a city's general plan. The second purpose is to adjust the existing City of Chula Vista land use designations to reflect the current use or future land uses of the sites. The Notice of Preparation for the Sphere of Influence EIR was issued on April 19, 1994. The draft EIR was circulated for public comment on January 6, 1995. The EIR addresses the environment impact of the recommended sphere boundary amendment and the attendant Chula Vista General Plan amendments, This EIR is a second tier document utilizing the Otay Ranch Program EIR. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a City of Chula Vista-initiated proposal to amend the City's Sphere of Influence boundary to include an additional 12,718 acres and to amend the Chula Vista General Plan to permit processing of the sphere document. A. Sphere of Influence Update The majority (87%) of the land within the proposed sphere amendment area is property within the Otay Ranch GDP/SRP. Other parcels within, or adjacent to, the Otay Ranch GDP/SRP are proposed for inclusion in the City's Sphere of Influence to avoid creating "county islands" and allow for the efficient provision of services, In October 1993, the County of San Diego and City of Chula Vista amended their respective General Plans to incorporate the Otay Ranch GDP/SRP, With limited exceptions, the sphere amendment area may be developed to the same land use intensity under either the City of Chula Vista or County of San Diego's General Plan. Similarly, the City of Chula Vista and City of San Diego General Plans provide for similar industrial uses where their jurisdictions overlap in Planning Area 4 (industrial area on Otay Mesa adjacent to Brown Field). For study purposes, the land within the Sphere of Influence amendment area is divided into five planning areas (see Exhibit I). The planning areas and associated acreage are presented below. Planning Area 1 - Otay Valley Planning Area: This Planning Area permits 18,942 homes on 9,298 acres, The Otay Valley Planning Area is surrounded on the west, north and east by the City of Chula Vista. This area is bounded by Telegraph Canyon Road on the north, Heritage Road and Brown Field on the south and Lower Otay Lake on the east. The Planning Area includes Otay Ranch Villages One- 9~J .-.-- Page 4 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 Eleven, Planning Area 12 (Eastern Urban Center [EUC), Planning Area 18b and other properties within, or adjacent to, the Otay Valley Parcel of Otay Ranch including the parcels proposed for amendment to the General Plan. Planning Area 2 - Resort Planning Area: The Resort Planning Area is comprised of mostl of Otay Ranch Village Thirteen, the Satterla Parcel (proposed for General Plan amendment) and Lower Otay Reservoir. This Planning Area would pennit 2,340 homes in 2,093 acres. Comments, pertaining to the SOI-EIR, ITom the San Diego County Department of Planning and Land Use, requested that this area not be added to the City's Sphere, City staff has begun discussions with County staff on the financial and planning impacts of this parcel and the Otay Landfill site. Resolution of the issues are not expected to be concluded for several months. Therefore, staff is recommending that this area be added to the City's Sphere. An alternative is to recommend to LAFCO that this area be designated a Special Study Area, to permit negotiations to be concluded with the County prior to LAFCO action. Planning Area 3 - Inverted "L" Planning Area: The Inverted "L" Planning Area is comprised of the Otay Ranch Inverted "L" Property and the Watson Property, This Planning Area permits 389 homes on 457 acres. Planning Area 4 - Otay Mesa Industrial Planning Area: For analytical purposes, the Otay Mesa Industrial Planning area is divided into two subareas: 1) West Mesa Industrial; and 2) N orth- East Mesa Industrial. The West Mesa Industrial subarea is located south of the Otay River Valley in the Otay Valley Parcel of Otay Ranch, This area is under the City of San Diego's jurisdiction and is designated Manufacturing Industrial Park (MIP} Under the County of San Diego and City of ChuIa Vista General Plan (Otay Ranch GDP/SRP), this 378.25-acre area includes 185.8 acres of industrial and 192A5 acres of open space. The North-East Mesa Industrial subarea is located south of the Otay River Valley, east of the proposed SR-125 alignment in the Otay Valley Parcel ofOtay Ranch. Under the County of San Diego and City ofChuIa Vista General Plans (Otay Ranch GDP/SRP), this 492.07 area includes 30 acres ofindustrial and 462.07 acres of open space. Detachment of this planning area ITom the City of San Diego has been reviewed by the Land Use and Housing Subcommittee of the San Diego City Council. They have recommended that the area not be detached ITom their City. Due to this recommendation and the potential for solving other common boundary issues with the City of San Diego, staff recommends Planning Area 4 be designated as a Special Study Area, This designation allows ChuIa Vista to return to LAFCO for a Sphere boundary amendment with the City of San Diego whenever the boundary issues are resolved. Planning Area 5 - Special Study Areas: As an ancillary task, the Sphere ofInfluence Update Study reviews "Special Study Areas" previously designated by LAFCO in 1985 (see Exhibit 2). They are not included in the EIR analysis and are not considered part of the proceedings to amend the Sphere boundary. These properties will remain Special Study Areas under this Sphere Update Study. In addition, the Sweetwater Parcel has been added to this Planning Area. The following properties are included in this planning area: ¡The Mary Patrick Estate property is already within the Chula Vista Sphere ofInfluence and; therefore, is not part of the Resort Planning Area. 1-t/ - "e__,· --.,,---..-- Page 5 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 · The Otay River Valley Special Study Area is a 369J2-acre property located east ofI-805, south of the Otay River, north of Palm Avenue and west of the Otay Rio Business Park. · The SR-54 Study Special Area designation is the boundary between National City and Chula Vista which jogs back and forth across SR-54 and the Sweetwater River between 1-5 and 1-805, · The South San Diego Bay Special Study Area is primarily tidelands owned by Western Salt Company and San Diego Gas and Electric Company which uses the area for an underwater outlet. A portion of National City extends down the middle of San Diego Bay and cuhninates in a large 350-acre site designated as public and open space under Chula Vista's General Plan. · The Sweetwater Special Study Area is a B0.48-acre parcel located along the northerly Sphere boundary, south of the Sweetwater Reservoir and within the City's 1989 General Plan area but not in the City's sphere. The property is designated Open Space on the City's plan. B. General Plan Amendments A summary of General Plan Amendments being processed with the Sphere of Influence Update is depicted in Exhibit 3. GPAs 95-01 and -02 propose Land Use Element designations for property within the Study Area that are not included in the General Plan. These amendments are proposed to comply with LAFCO policies on sphere boundaries. LAFCO requires property proposed for inclusion within a sphere be included within the General Plan in order to assess the need for urban services, GP A 95-03 proposes to amend the land use designation in three locations for existing or future public utility sites, 1. GPA 95-01 Satterla Parcel This 20-acre site is surrounded by Village Thirteen of the Otay Ranch (see Exhibit 3-A) and does not have a Chula Vista land use designation. When the General Plan was amended for the Otay Ranch, only The Baldwin Company holdings were considered, thereby leaving a "hole" in the City's Plan, This GP A will place a designation on the property filling that hok Staff is recommending Low Density Residential (0-3 DUslac) designation for the parcel to be compatible with adjacent Otay Ranch designations. The mid-point density of the site would allow up to 30 units on the parcel which would be subject to all of the City's rules and regulations when annexed to the City. Otherwise, the site is limited to one unit in the County, 2. GPA 95-02 Lower Otay Reservoir Similar to the Satterla Parcel, the Lower Otay Reservoir properties, (see Exhibit 3-B) are not within the City's General Plan. Prior to the adoption of the Otay Ranch GPA, the City's General Plan boundary ran along the north side of Otay Lakes Road, With the approval of the Otay Ranch GP A, several parcels that are part of the City of San Diego holdings for the Lower Otay Reservoir north of 9-5 -..-- -"-_.~..._, Page 6 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 Otay Lakes Road were surrounded by the City's General Plan These parcels contain small drainage valleys and aIToYos and total 28.66 acres in size. Since these parcels are surrounded by Open Space on the Otay Ranch GDP Village Thirteen and part of the Lower Otay Reservoir which is designated Open Space, staff is recommending they be designated Open Space as well. 3. GPA 95-03 This General Plan Amendment addresses publicly owned land within the Otay Valley Parcel of the Otay Ranch as indicated on Exhibit 3-C These properties are all within the City's General Plan area and are proposed for amendment to ensure that land uses will remain compatible with adjacent proposed land uses. Otay Water District Property: The Baldwin Company has conveyed approximately 61 acres in the northeast corner of the Otay Valley Parcel, adjacent to the future SR-125, to the Otay Water District. The property is designated Low-Medium Density Residential (3-6 DUs/ac) on the General Plan. The District plans to locate water tanks or reservoirs on this property at some time in the future, Therefore, staff believes the most appropriate land use designation for the property is Public/Quasi-Public, Water Reservoir: The Water Reservoir Parcel is located in the southern portion of the Otay Valley Parcel in Village Eight The parcel is owned by the City of San Diego Water Utilities Department and contains an existing water storage facility, Presently, within the General Plan, the 19.59-acre parcel is designated Low-Medium Density Residential (3-6 DUs/ac) however, as a water storage facility no development is anticipated in the foreseeable future. Therefore, a GPA to Public/Quasi-Public is proposed. Otay Landfill: The San Diego County Otay Landfill is located along the western edge of the Otay Valley ParceL This 250.59-acre site is designated Open Space on the City's General Plan and is called out as the Otay County Disposal Area on the Land Use Map. The landfill is estimated to have approximately 14 years of capacity remaining. As a public landfill, staff recommends that appropriate land use designation for the landfill is Public/Quasi-Public, ill. ANALYSIS A. Program Environmental Impact Report On July 21, 1994, the City of Chula Vista entered into a three party contract with Lettieri-McIntyre and Associates and The Baldwin Company to prepare a (Second Tier) Program Environmental Impact Report on the City of Chula Vista Sphere of Influence Update Study. The Baldwin Company was responsible for reimbursing the City for the PEIR preparation. The PEIR analyzes four major issues: land use, agriculture, public services and fiscal. Although no significant impacts of the proposed Sphere ofInfluence or GP As were found to be associated with these four issues, they are discussed in detail to supply and assist inLAFCO's evaluation of the City's Sphere of Influence amendment request. With respect to the four major issues, the PEIR concludes that the proposed Sphere of Influence amendment and associated GP As would not have a significant impact on the environment. Consequently, no project-specific mitigation measures are required. 9't ._..."~_.._. __._....o·",m""'_'___ Page 7 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 Direct impacts related to the following environmental issues were also detennined to be not significant: · Biology · Geology · Cultural Resources · Housing · Traffic · Air Quality · Noise · Paleontology · Water Quality · Landform/Visual Quality · Energy · Risk of Upset · Light/Glare · Natural Resources · Population · Health This conclusion is based on the fact that the Sphere of Influence amendment, in and of itself, would not result in a physical change because development potential will not change substantially by placing the area under the jurisdiction of the City of Chula Vista, As noted earlier, the County of San Diego and the City ofChula Vista Land Use Plans are essentially identical for the Otay Ranch GDP/SRP area, The analysis in the EIR does not change the detenninations that were made in the prior Program EIR for the Otay Ranch GDP/SRP. The GDP/SRP PEIR concludes significant unmitigated impacts for the issues of land use, landfonn alteration, biological resources, agriculture, mineral resources, transportation/circulation access, air quality and noise, While the proposed Sphere Update would not result in direct impacts, combined with the cumulative impacts identified in the Otay Ranch GDP/SRP EIR, the impacts would still be cumulatively significant This conservative approach is considered warranted as any increase to an already significant unmitigated cumulative impact would still be significant Recirculation of the Draft PEIR is not required because changes in the conclusion can be made without recirculating a Draft PEIR if it does not provide new information indicating that the impact is more severe than previously considered, The Sphere of Influence Update PEIR and Findings conclude that no sphere-specific mitigation measures are available to reduce the cumulative impacts to below a level of significance. While no sphere-specific mitigation measures exist, implementation of the goals and policies of the Chula Vista General Plan as well as subsequent CEQA review of future development proposals within the Sphere Update area would reduce potential impacts, In addition, implementation of the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Otay Ranch GDP/SRP would reduce impacts resulting ITom development of the portions of this project which would be included in the Sphere of Influence. As no detennination can be made as to the ability of these processes to reduce cumulative impacts to below a level of significance, the cumulative impacts are considered significant and not mitigable. A Statement of Overriding Considerations is therefore part of the proceedings. B. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Two alternatives were analyzed in the EIR based upon the ability to: 1) meet the basic objectives of the project provided; and 2) eliminate significant environmental impacts, No Project Alternative: The No Project Alternative assumes that the Chula Vista Sphere of Influence would remain in its existing configuration as adopted in 1985 and amended by subsequent amendments and annexations. The non-Otay Ranch parcels would develop under the current County land use designations and intensities. The No Project Alternative would avoid the net increase of 162 residential units that would result ITom the proposed Sphere of Influence amendment The draft EIR states that 9-7 ----._-- Page 8 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 the No Project Alternative would not substantially change the conclusions associated with the proposed amendment For the majority of Otay Ranch, the same development intensity would occur since the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego adopted identical land use plans. Elimination of Planning Area 2: This alternative would exclude all of Planning Area 2 (Otay Ranch Resort area) rrom the City's proposed Sphere of Influence and allow for Otay Ranch Village Thirteen, the Satterla Parcel and the Lower Otay ReselVoir parcels to be developed under the County's land use designations. The Draft EIR concludes that this alternative would not offer a significant change in the conclusions of the environmental analysis because land use intensity would be essentially identical under County jurisdiction. Rejected Alternatives: Several alternatives identified in response to the Notice of Preparation were considered but rejected rrom further analysis. These alternatives are briefly discussed in Section IX of the EIR and include: "Exclusion of the County Landfill"; "Exclusion of Planning Area 4"; "Exclusion of the County Landfil~ Village Three and Planning Area 4"; "Exclusion of the City of San Diego property"; "Offsite Alternative"; and "Exclusion of the County Landfill, Village Three, Planning Area 4 and the Otay River Valley", C. FISCAL ANALYSIS A fiscal analysis of the impacts of jurisdictional changes to public services is part of the Sphere of Influence Update Study. The FIND (Fiscal Impact of New Development) Model used in the Otay Ranch GDP/SRP was updated to reflect 1993-1994 City and County budgets, The fiscal analysis, while not required by law, is summarized in the Study and reviewed as part of the PEIR, The analysis assesses the impacts of development of the four planning areas on both the City and the County. In addition, the analysis reflects only the current property tax transfer agreement between the City and County for sharing revenues when property annexes to the City. Preparation of a new agreement would be required after the Sphere adoption and prior to annexation. 1. Combined Total Fiscal Impact on the City and County A comparison of the fiscal projections for the General Funds of the City and the County is shown in Exhibit 4. This exhibit presents the summary of the net fiscal impact analysis assuming that all development within the four planning areas of the Sphere Study occurs within the City of Chula Vista. Currently, the analysis assumes that of the 19,9 % the County receives of the 1 % property tax, 6.5 percentage points will shift to the City upon annexation. The analysis uses an estimate of 9.3 % of the 1% property tax for the City. The analysis illustrates that the City will incur a negative fiscal impact under the existing assumptions during the first half of the development years. However, when the property tax transfer agreement between the County and the City is adjusted to reflect the cost and level of municipal services, there would be sufficient revenues to make both General Funds positive over the entire development period, This tax agreement is negotiated with the County of San Diego as part of the master tax agreement prior to annexation of the Planning Areas. The City Manager and the County Deputy Chief Administrative Officer have already begun discussions to resolve this issue, 7'-1" ----~_.~._----,.._.._,....~_..._--,..._--~_.__. Page 9 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 2. Fiscal Impact by Planning Area The fol1owing summarizes the fiscal impacts by Planning Area for the buildout Year 2024 for the City and County General Funds assuming that, within the Sphere area, development proceeds within the City of Chula Vista under the current transfer tax agreement Planning Area 1 - Otay Valley Planning Area: This Planning Area represents most of the proposed residential development within the Sphere Update area. In addition, commercial uses are assumed to be developed. For the City's General Fund, revenues are projected at $16.8 million and costs at $16,7 million for a net surplus of less than $100,000. This represents a revenue/cost ratio of 1.004, For the County's General Fund, revenues are projected at $12.5 million and costs at $62 million for a net surplus of approximately $6.3 million. This represents a revenue/cost ratio of 2.02. Thus, the City breaks even for this Planning Area while the County is projected to have a relatively large surplus. Planning Area 2 - Resort Planning Area: This Planning Area would result in residential and resort commercial uses, For the City's General Fund, revenues are projected at $3.5 million and costs at $2.3 million for a net surplus of approximately $1.2 million. This represents a revenue/cost ratio of 1.54. For the County's General Fund, revenues are projected at about $171,000 and cost at $203,000 for net deficit of approximately $32,000. This represents a revenue/cost of ratio of 0,84. Thus, the City is projected to yield a relatively large surplus trom this Planning Area while the County is projected to have a small deficit due to the small tax base of the Planning Area and the City receiving transient occupancy and sales taxes. Planning Area 3 - Inverted "L" Planning Area: This Planning Area is planned for only residential development For the City's General Fund, revenues are projected at $236,000 and costs at $255,000 for a relatively small net deficit of approximately $19,000. This represents a revenue/cost ratio of about 0.93, For the County's General Fund, revenues are projected at about $52,000 and costs at $65,000 for a relatively small net deficit of about $13,000, This represents a revenue/cost ratio of approximately 0.79, Planning Area 4 - Otay Mesa Industrial Planning Area: Only industrial development is planned for Planning Area 4. For the City's General Fund, revenues are projected at $1.2 million and costs at $0.5 million for a net surplus of about $700,000, This represents a revenue/cost ratio of about 2.47. For the County's General Fund, revenues are projected at about $266,000 and costs at $68,000 for a net surplus of about $198,000. This represents a revenue/cost ratio of about 3,93. D. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Notice of Preparation The Notice of Preparation for the Sphere of Influence EIR was issued on April 19, 1994. The fol1owing agencies and individuals responded to the Notice of Preparation: State of Califomia Department of Water Conservation; State ofCalifomia Department ofFish and Game; City ofChula 9r9 - -_..~~_._. ___n.__..'__..·.. Page 10 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 Vista Fire Department; City of Chula Vista Department of Public Works; City of Chula Vista, City Traffic Engineer; Local Agency Fonnation Commission; Metropolitan Water District of Southern California; City of San Diego Planning Department; County of San Diego Planning Department; San Diego County Water Authority; Sweetwater Authority; Sweetwater Union High School District and United States Department ofInterior Fish and Wildlife Services, 2. Comments on Draft Em Written comments on the Draft EIR were received ITom the following agencies and individuals Local Agency Fonnation Commission Otay Water District California Department ofFish and Game City of San Diego Metropolitan Water District Jeanne Evans Sweetwater Authority San Diego County San Diego County Water Authority The Baldwin Company Responses to these comments are provided in the Final Program EIR. Written comments were received ITom John D, Dauz, one of the owners of the DeGraaf Parcel, concerning the spelling of the owners name, size and General Plan designation. The name change has been noted and appropriate changes made. The 1989 General Plan designated this property as Open Space. No changes are proposed as part of this Study, Planning staff is working on alternatives to address the issues raised in his letter, 3. Sphere ofInßuence Public Forum On February 9, 1995, the City of Chula Vista Otay Ranch Project Team and the staff of the Local Agency Fonnation Commission conducted a noticed joint public forum at EastLake High School regarding the Sphere of Influence Update Study and attendant EIR. The Workshop was attended by approximately 30 members of the public. The vast majority of the discussion focused on the Bonita/Sweetwater Area, Virtually all the speakers expressed strong opposition to the current Sphere of Influence governing this area, suggesting that the Local Agency Fonnation Commission modity the City ofChula Vista Sphere of Influence area to exclude the Bonita/Sweetwater Valley area. 4. Planning Commission Em Hearing On February 22, 1995, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to take testimony on the information contained within the Draft PEIR. The Commission voted unanimously to close the hearing and public review period for the Draft PEIR and direct staff to prepare the Final Program EIR with responses to the comments made in correspondence and at the hearing. 9,,/tl ----------"...----- Page 11 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 5. Planning Commissioners Comments During the February 22, 1995 EIR hearing, several of the Planning Commissioners inquired about various issues in the Sphere Study and the Program EIR. Responses to the Commissioners comments are provided here for City Council infonnation. Planning Commissioner Salas questioned whether EastLake development caused or exacerbated the flooding drainage problems in Central Avenue. Staff has researched the concerns and have the following response: The EastLake and Salt Creek projects contain 304 acres within the Sunnyside Drainage Basin which contribute to Central Creek The entire basin contains 4,073 acres. The 304 acres represent 7,5% of the basin, When the portion ofEastLake I west of the SR-125 corridor was developed, the City required the developer to construct a detention/desilting basin to reduce the ultimate 100-year runoff ITom the development and to trap silt ITom the development. The combination of the desiltingldetention facility, erosion control measures and a small area contributing to the Central Creek, results in little to no runoff impact to the Central Basin area. Additional information on the drainage issues in the Bonita area is provided in the attached memorandum (Exhibit 5), In regard to comments made by Bonita residents concerning being within Chula Vista's Sphere, Commissioner Martin asked for clarification on the purposes of a sphere as a planning tool to avoid duplication of urban services. Staff indicated that Commissioner Martin was correct; a sphere for a city or special district enabled the agency to adequately plan for the extension of public or urban services and to avoid duplication by other agencies. Commissioner Fuller inquired about the status of the DeGraaf Parcel and the Open Space corridor along Telegraph Canyon Road. Staff responded that the City's 1989 General Plan Land Use Element planned for the north facing slopes on the south side of Telegraph Canyon Road to remain as open space to provide a corridor along the road. The Otay Ranch GDP retains that open space and expands it due to habitat. No changes in land use designation are proposed as part of the Sphere Study, however, City staff members are aware of the property owners concern regarding the Open Space designation and are studying alternatives with the first Otay Ranch SPA to address this concern. Commissioner Ray inquired about the County of San Diego letter addressing annexation phasing. The County of San Diego believes that annexations should occur on a SP A-by-SP A basis. City staff has recommended in the Sphere Study that all four Planning Areas be annexed to the City at one time. It is especially important to annex all of the Otay Valley Parcel, Planning Area I, because public facilities need to be planned and extended up the Otay Valley to serve the Otay Valley ParceL Commissioner Ray asked why the EIR found the development of the Watson parcel as insignificant. Staff responded that while change ITom the County plan allowing 24 units to the City's allowing 244 might seem significant on a project basis when compared to the total Otay Ranch development of 23,000, the change was not seen as significant. Future projects on the Watson Parcel will still under go environmental review at the development project level for determination of impacts and appropriate mitigation, 9-/1 ~_._..,-------_..- Page 12 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 Commissioner Ray then asked if the issue before the Commission was not a comparison of the impacts of moving the Sphere boundary and the net increase between the County and City Plans, Staff responded that was correct and because both the County and the City had adopted the same land use plan, there would be little increase in impacts by moving the Sphere boundary under this program level of review Additional environmental review will be accomplished on future discretionary actions. Commissioner Ray asked if the Final EIR would respond to comments in the LAFCO letter. Staff indicated that LAFCO's letter and responses would be in the Final EIR. Commissioner Ray asked for additional details on Planning Area 4. Staff responded that the City's analyses indicated the industrial area Planning Area 4 would not develop until the end of the IS-year time rrame of the Sphere, and services would come rrom the extension of La Media across the Otay Valley to the mesa. Given this time rrame, utility requirements, staff now believes it would be appropriate to designate Planning Area 4 as a Special Study Area until the other boundary issues with the City of San Diego can be resolved. As a Special Study Area, the City can return to LAFCO at any time when an acceptable solution has been reached with the City of San Diego, Commissioner Ray then inquired about the IS-year time rrame of the Sphere and the timing of SR-I2S. The current projections for SR-I2S indicate that it will be constructed within the IS-year time rrame of the proposed Sphere boundary, and ifit is not, then the Interim SR-I2S solution would allow a certain amount of development until the City's threshold limits were reached, All future development would be subject to all the growth management ordinances of the City. Additional transportation models are being prepared, as required, for the review of the first SPA Those studies will be part of future discretionary actions for SPA One. Commissioner Fuller inquired about the City and County of San Diego and Department of Fish and Game concerns about the MSCP program somehow not being implemented if the Otay River Valley was within Chula Vista's Sphere. She asked if the Otay River Valley would be subject to the MSCP Program because the City and the County had adopted the same land use plan for the valley. Staff responded that the Otay River Valley was Open Space on the Otay Ranch GDP and that Plan had been submitted to the MSCP Program as an alternative. There are, however, portions of the Plan that the Department of Fish and Game do not agree with and that disagreement would also occur if the valley remained in the County. FISCAL IMPACTS Sphere of Influence: None, LAFCO filing fees will be paid by The Baldwin Company. LAFCO fees for Sphere ofInfluence will be based on the area decided upon by the City Council for the Sphere application. LAFCO charges $3,500 plus $250 per 100 acres outside the City's existing Sphere, There are no additional fees for reviewing the EIR. The fiscal implications of adding the Otay Ranch to the City are discussed in the Fiscal Analysis, Section E, of this Agenda Statement. 9-/.2. .-...--.. __'___0.- Page 13 Meeting Date: March 14. 1995 General Plan Amendments: None, Exhibits: Exhibit I Sphere of Influence Study Area Exhibit 2 Special Study Area Exhibit 3 General Plan Amendments Exhibit 3-A GPA 95-01 Exhibit 3-B GP A 95-02 Exhibit 3-C GP A 95-03 Exhibit 4 Net Fiscal hnpact Summary Exhibit 5 Memorandum to Jerry Jamriska, ITem William Ullrich, dated March 2,1995 Attachments: Resolution No, Resolution EIR 94-03 RCC Minutes ITem February 6, 1995 meeting Planning Commission Minutes fìom February 22, 1995 meeting 9-/3 ."--y,-. ------.-- RESOLUTION NO. 17'63/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CERTIFYING THE FINAL PROGRAM (SECOND TIER) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR 94-03) FOR THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE STUDY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, ACCEPTING THE DRAFT SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE STUDY AND DIRECTING ITS SUBMITTAL TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR ADOPTION WHEREAS, California State law mandates that each Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) adopt a Sphere of Influence plan for each city and special district within its jurisdiction; and, WHEREAS, in 1985, LAFCO adopted a Sphere of Influence for the City of Chula Vista and, in 1990, adopted procedures for updating spheres of influence; and, WHEREAS, in November of 1992, the City of Chula Vista, in compliance with those procedures, completed and filed with San Diego LAFCO a sphere of influence questionnaire; and, WHEREAS, on July 12, 1993, the LAFCO Commission approved commencement of a comprehensive sphere of influence update study for the City of Chula Vista based on their Executive Director's recommendation; and, WHEREAS, in December of 1994, the Otay Ranch Project Team completed the draft Sphere ofInfluence Update Study on four planning areas to add 12,718 acres to the City's Sphere. This proposal includes land owned by The Baldwin Company referred to as the Otay Ranch in addition to other land not owned by The Baldwin Company; and, WHEREAS, in order to comply with LAFCO procedures, and to make the Land Use Element of the City of Chula Vista General Plan consistent with existing and future public uses, the City has concurrently initiated several amendments to the General Plan as defined in Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista circulated a request for proposals to prepare an environmental impact report on the Sphere ofInfluence Update Study, selected the firm of Lettieri-McIntyre and Associates out of seven candidate firms to prepare the EIR and, on July 21,1994, entered into a three party contract between the City, Lettieri-McIntyre and Associates and The Baldwin Company where the City managed the preparation of the EIR, Lettieri-McIntyre prepared the EIR and the Baldwin Company reimbursed the City for the cost ofEIR preparation; and 9~/5 __"_·_·_'___"."M_..~~_.__."._.__._,.~___ _____.__.,."...--~_._,_.___ .," . . _ ----.-.-.-.....--..---... ..--.....- _ u·_.____ City Council Page 2 Sphere of Influence Resolution WHEREAS, the firm of Lettieri-McIntyre and Associates has prepared a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (DPEIR 94-03) on the Draft Sphere Study and General Plan Amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Planning Commission, on February 22, 1995, held a duly noticed public hearing to take public testimony on the adequacy of the information in the DPEIR 94-03, closed the hearing and public review period and directed the Final Program Environmental Impact Report be prepared including the responses to the comments received on the DPEIR; and, WHEREAS, comments received by the City, including those from LAFCO, caused the City to conclude in the Final EIR that certain project impacts identified as less than significant in the Draft EIR are, in fact, cumulatively significant and unmitigatable. This change in conclusions does not constitute a disclosure that a new significant environmental impact would result in the project, that a significant increase in the severity of an already considered environmental impact would result ITom the project, that of feasible project alternative or mitigation measure would clearing lessen the significant environmental effects of that project, or that the Draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and the conclusory in nature as to preclude meaningful public review and comment (CEQA Guidelines, Paragraph 15088.5, Subparagraph (a). Therefore, recirculation of the Draft EIR is neither necessary or appropriate, because the change in conclusions involves only a revision of the City's ultimate characterization of cumulative impacts and not new information regarding the impacts themselves; and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Planning Commission, on March 14, 1995, held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed General Plan Amendments and Sphere of Influence Update Study, and reviewed the contents of the Study and recommended that the City Council amend the General Plan as indicated in Exhibit A, accept the subject study and direct its submittal to LAFCO for adoption as indicated in the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. EIR 94-03; and, WHEREAS, the City Council, on March 14, 1995, held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed General Plan Amendments and Sphere of Influence Update Study, and reviewed the contents of the Study and agreed with its conclusions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (DPEIR 94-03); and, WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the Draft Sphere of Influence Update Study is consistent with the City's General Plan, including the Growth Management Element, and that the territory covered by the Study could ultimately receive urban services; and, ccreso.doc '-j¿' _~___._ ,_ __ _____.~_..._'__n -"".-----------.-..-.'.--...,--. - ------ -~_....._---.-._--~._,-----_.-- ._-~--_.._- City Council Page 3 Sphere ofInfluence Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows: 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS. That the Land Use Element of the Chula Vista General Plan be amended as indicated in Exhibit 3-A,B and C II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD. The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on the Draft PEIR held on February 22, 1995, and their public hearing on this Project held on March 14, 1995, and the minutes and resolutions resulting thererrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents along with any documents submitted to the decision makers shall comprises the entire record of the proceedings for any CEQA claims IlL FPEIR CONTENTS. That the FPEIR consists ofthe following: A Final Program ( Second Tier) Environmental Impact Report 94-03 B. Appendices (A through F) to Final Program Environmental Impact Report. C Technical studies and information incorporated in the responses to comments. IY FPEIR REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED. That the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has reviewed, analyzed and considered FPEIR 94-03, the environmental impacts therein identified for this Project; the Candidate CEQA Findings, Attachment ';.\"to this Resolution, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, the proposed mitigation measures contained therein, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Attachment 'B" to this Resolution, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, Attachment 'C" to this Resolution, prior to approving the Project. ccreso.doc 9~/? __ _..___.~___.._ __ - ______.__.__.~._ .._____.u____...________________..__ - - ---~._~ ---..--- ---"._~-~._--_._- -- City Council Page 4 Sphere of Influence Resolution V. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA. That the City Council does hereby find that FPEIR 94-03, the Candidate CEQA Findings, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the Statement of Overriding Considerations are prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista, VI. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL. That the City Council finds that the FPEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista City CounciL VII. FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. That the City Council hereby finds that the Project, including but not limited to the adoption of the General Plan Amendment, is and will be consistent with the General Plan. VIII. CEQA FINDINGS, MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS. A. Adoption of Findings. The City Council does hereby approve, accept as its own, incorporate as if set forth in full herein, and make each and every one of the findings contained in the Findings of Fact, Attachment "A" to this Resolution, B. Certain Mitigation Measures Feasible and Adopted. As more fully identified and set forth in the program EIR for the Otay Ranch General Development Plan/Subregional Plan and in the CEQA Findings for this project, which is Attachment "A" to this Resolution, the Council hereby finds pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 that the mitigation measures described in the above referenced documents are feasible. C. Unfeasibility of Alternatives. As is also noted in the above-referenced environmental documents, alternatives to the project which were identified as potentially feasible in the EIR were found not be feasible. ccreso.doc 9-/Y -- -------< -----..---- _ ._m... ____,_'u_.,__'.,_., M"'__._'" __~_...._ _ __ '..__".._.., ,___,_.m..___ -...- ..,,----,-----~- -- City Council Page 5 Sphere of Influence Resolution D, Adoption of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. As required by the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City Council hereby adopts Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ('Program') set forth in Attachment 'B" of this Resolution, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk The Council hereby finds that the Program is designed to ensure that during project implementation the permittee/project applicant and any other responsible parties implement the project components and comply with the feasible mitigation measures identified in the Findings and the Program. E. Statement of Overriding Consideration Even after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures and any feasible alternatives, certain significant or potentially significant environmental effects caused by the project, or cumulatively, will remain. Therefore, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby issues, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, a Statement of Overriding Considerations in the form set forth in Attachment C, identifYing the specific economic, social, and other considerations that render the unavoidable significant adverse environmental effects acceptable. IX. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION. That the Environmental Review Coordinator of the City of Chula Vista is directed after City Council approval of this project to ensure that a Notice of Determination, together with a copy of this resolution, its exhibits, and all resolutions passed by the City Council in connection with this project, is filed with the County Clerk of the County of San Diego. These documents along with any documents submitted to the decision makers shall comprise the record of proceedings for any CEQA claims. X. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE STUDY The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby orders that the Sphere of Influence Update Study accepted on March 14, 1995, as shown on Exhibit B be submitted to the San Diego County Local Agency Formation Commission for official adoption. ccreso.doc 9-/7 -~--_._.__.'---_...__. ._-,',- .__..._,.__.--------,-_..._.~--,--_...._.- - - _..0. ._...._._.. ...__._._.~_ RESOLUTION NO. EIR 94-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CERTIFYING THE FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR 94-03) FOR THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE STUDY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT IT AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT, ACCEPT THE DRAFT SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE STUDY AND DIRECT ITS SUBMITTAL TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR ADOPTION WHEREAS, California State law mandates that each Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) adopt a Sphere of Influence plan for each city and special district within its jurisdiction; and, WHEREAS, in 1985, LAFCO adopted a Sphere of Influence for the City of Chula Vista and in 1990 adopted procedures for updating spheres of influence; and, WHEREAS, in November of 1992, the City of Chula Vista, in compliance with those procedures, completed and filed with San Diego LAFCO a sphere of influence questionnaire; and, WHEREAS, on July 12,1993, the LAFCO Commission approved commencement of a comprehensive sphere of influence update study for the City of Chula Vista based on their Executive Director's recommendation; and, WHEREAS, in December of 1994, the Otay Ranch Project Team completed the draft Sphere ofInfluence Update Study on four planning areas to add 12,718 acres to the City's Sphere. This proposal includes land owned by the Baldwin company refeed to as the Otay Ranch addition to other land not owned by the Baldwin Company; and, WHEREAS, in order to comply with LAFCO procedures, and to make the Land Use Element of the City of Chula Vista General Plan consistent with existing and future public uses, the City has initiated several amendments to the General Plan as defined in Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista circulated a request for proposals to prepare an environmental impact report on the Sphere ofInfluence Update Study, selected the firm of Lettieri-McIntyre and Associates out of seven candidate firms to prepare the EIR and, on July 21,1994, entered into a three party contract between the City, Lettieri-McIntyre and Associates and The Baldwin Company where the City managed the preparation of the 9·'; I . .-...-- --._,.--_._---..._--~_._- Planning Commission Page 2 Sphere of Influence Resolution EIR, Lettieri-McIntyre prepared the EIR and the Baldwin Company reimbursed the City for the cost ofEIR preparation; and WHEREAS, the firm of Lettieri-McIntyre and Associates has prepared a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (DPEIR 94-03) on the Draft Sphere Study and General Plan Amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Planning Commission, on February 22, 1995, held a duly noticed public hearing to take public testimony on the adequacy of the information in the DPEIR 94-03 and directed the Final Program Environmental Impact Report be prepared including the responses to the comments received on the DPEIR; and, WHEREAS, comments received by the City, including those ITom LAFCO, caused the City to conclude in the Final EIR that certain project impacts identified as less than significant in the Draft EIR are, in fact, cumulatively significant and unmitigatable. This change in conclusions does not constitute a disclosure that a new significant environmental impact would result in the project, that a significant increase in the severity of an already considered environmental impact would result ITom the project, that of feasible project alternative or mitigation measure would clearing lessen the significant environmental effects of that project, or that the Draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and the conclusory in nature as to preclude meaningful public review and comment (CEQA Guidelines, Paragraph 15088.5, Subparagraph (a)). Therefore, recirculation of the Draft EIR is neither necessary or appropriate, because the change in conclusions involves only a revision of the City's ultimate characterization of cumulative impacts and not new information regarding the impacts themselves; and, WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Planning Commission, on March 14, 1995, held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed General Plan Amendments and Sphere of Influence Update Study, reviewed the contents of the Study and recommended that the City Council amend the General Plan, accept the subject study and direct its submittal to LAFCO for adoption; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the Draft Sphere of Influence Update Study is consistent with the City's General Plan, including the Growth Management Element, and that the territory covered by the Study could ultimately receive urban services; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Planning Commission of the City ofChula Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows: I. FPEIR CONTENTS. That the FPEIR consists of the following: pcreso.doc 9-.2).. u_,__.___.__.. ........_..__ . ----_.._--_._.__.~_.._.-- ....---. . ".'w .___....__n___. Planning Commission Page 3 Sphere ofInfluence Resolution A Final Program Environmental Impact Report 94-03 B. Appendices (A through F) to Final Program Environmental Impact Report, C. Technical studies and information incorporated in the responses to comments. IL FPEIR REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED. That the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista has reviewed, analyzed and considered FPEIR 94-03, the environmental impacts therein identified for this Project; the Candidate CEQA Findings, Attachment "A" to this Resolution, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, the proposed mitigation measures contained therein, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Attachment "B" to this Resolution, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, prior to approving the Project. III. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA That the Planning Commission does hereby find that FPEIR 94-03, the Candidate CEQA Findings and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista. IV INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSION. That the Planning Commission finds that the FPEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City ofChula Vista Planning Commission, V CEQA FINDINGS, MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS. A Adoption of Findings. The Planning Commission does hereby approve, accept as its own, incorporate as if set forth in full herein, and make each and every one of the findings contained in the Findings of Fact, Attachment "A" this Resolution. B. Certain Mitigation Measure Feasible and Adopted. pcreso.doc 9"~3 - _______n_..___.. .._"~..._._._ ___._._..__...._____ __ __ _. ___n_,_ ..-.-----.-. ..-----.-....----.-.----- .-...-.. ...-.-.........--...-----.-- Planning Commission Page 4 Sphere of Influence Resolution As more fully identified and set forth in the Sphere of Influence Update Study Program EIR and in the CEQA Findings for this project, which is Attachment "A" to this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby finds pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 that the mitigation measures described in the above referenced documents are feasible and will become binding upon the entity (such as the project proponent, the City or the school district) assigned thereby to implement same. C. Unfeasibility of Alternatives. As is also noted in the above-referenced environmental documents, alternatives to the project which were identified as potentially feasible in the EIR were found not be feasible, D. Adoption of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, As required by the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, Planning Commission hereby adopts Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Program") set forth in Attachment "B" of this Resolution, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Program is designed to ensure that during project implementation the permittee/project applicant and any other responsible parties implement the project components and comply with the feasible mitigation measures identified in the Findings and the Program. E Statement of Overriding Consideration Even after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures and any feasible alternatives, certain significant or potentially significant environmental effects caused by the project, or cumulatively, will remain. Therefore, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby issues, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, a Statement of Overriding Considerations in the form set forth in Attachment C, identifying the specific economic, social, and other considerations that render the unavoidable significant adverse environmental effects acceptable. Notice ofDetermiaatioR, The ERViroßmelltal Re'/iew CoordiRator of the City of Clmla Vista is directed after City COI:IRcil approval of this project to eR~lIre that a Notice of DetermiRatioR, together '.vith a copy of this resoIDtioR, its e¡¡hiàits, aRd all resoIDtioRs passed by the City COIIRcil iR cORnectioR with this projeet, is tiled ""ith the COIlIIty Clerk of the COllllty of SaR Diego. pcreso.doc 9".J.ý -- - ,-~_._~_.__..__._~- ---- - --'._--_."-- --_.~.._-_.__.__._- - .-.-..-....-..-. -.....-... ----.-..---..-. Planning Commission Page 5 Sphere of Influence Resolution BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, the Commission recommends that the City Council: A. CERTIFY FINAL PROGRAM EIR 94-03, B. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS. Amended the Land Use Element of the Chula Vista General Plan be as indicated on Exhibit - C FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, Find that the Sphere of Influence Update Study, including but not limited to the adoption of the General Plan Amendment, is and will be consistent with the General Plan. D. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE STUDY Accept the Sphere ofInfluence Update Study and order that the Sphere of Influence Update Study accepted on March 14, 1995, as shown on Exhibit _ be submitted to the San Diego County Local Agency Formation Commission for official adoptioR Attachment 1 Findings of Fact Attachment 2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Attachment 3 Statement of Overriding Consideration Exhibit A General Plan Amendments Exhibit B City ofChula Vista Sphere ofInfluence Update Study Exhibit C pcreso.doc 9".25 ---_..-_----"------ ------------- -..- ---- ._._._..._._..__.~-_..--._._-~~.- . .._... ...."---.._-. ....--..--.--.- -"'--- - -----------...-------------- ¡E]. e ( ) - CD êõ5 ... " , -.'"0 :.ë -elff,j Ii < Q. '- , >:J~ ~ c ~¡ < i ~ I 'tI ( ) ¡¡¡ · ~ if 8 1 i .2 g ~ c( · ¡¡ CD . >- II) ( ) m ....~з"·$ c CD ::I · ;) 0<:: · . '0" .;¡ Iii c: C Q CD- · ~ .. ::I'" · Ie 0 · ¡¡; (,) .5 ~ w ...1ü~ -lJ . :s en o Q. ! ~ Q c('gW CDcn ",- U ... ,5:J!Q CD ~:I c.. .c .!~~ ~ "'Po. $ ~ ~ ~~ûI ~~ 'I ~ r:.< f í/ ¡/log - - 9-..27 - - -- - - -- - - --.- -- - - -- - - - - - - - - I ! I , ,- ~B' I / 15. ; .. ~ z' ! ~ / 5= LL.~"'" S" C . ~ .!- . " Q)Q) - ~ ( )~ ¡E' !'g ., ", " .s¡ß .§ Õ. ... jf ~ c " ..~ .'" ¡¡; . =- ~ . co: ., ~ ~ u Õ ¡;.., ~ U G.I ~ ~ , ~ Special Study Areas 1994 Sphere of Influence Update Study -.2Y EXHIBIT 2 ~-~-~.__._._--~--_._--_._.._-~-- -,..~._-----_...._._----.._---_.~---_._,_.,-_.."._----..--. Exhibit 3. General Plan Amendments. County Current Proposed General ChuJa Vista CbuJa Vista Planning Parcel Description Acres Plan General General Plan Case Plan GPA 95-01 Satterla This property is located in the 20 Multiple Rural None Low-Density Parcel middle of Village Thirteen of Use 1 DU 30 DUs the Otav Ranch, GPA 95-02 Lower Otay The properties are located on 2L84 Multiple Rural None Open Space Reservoir the western and southern edge Use 0 DUs ODUs Property of the Otay Ranch Village Thirteen area and adjacent to the Lower Otay Reservoir. The properties are owned by the City of San Diego as part of their OIay Reservoir holdinl!s. GP A 95-03 Otay Water The property is located in the 61 Intensive Low- Public/Quasi- District northeastern center of the Agriculture Medium Public Property Otay Valley Planning Area ODUs ODUs adjacent to the EastLake Land SWaD Prnrvorties. GP A 95-03 Water The property is located in the 19.59 Intensive Low- Public/Quasi- Reservoir southern portion (within the Agriculture Medium Public Otay Ranch Village Eight ODUs ODUs area) of the Otay Valley Planning Area. This parce1 is owned by the City of San Diego Water Utilities Department and is used as a water storal!e tàcilitv. GP A 95-03 Otay Landfill The San Diego County Otay 250.59 Intensive Open Space Public/Quasi- Landfill is located along the Agriculture Public western edge of the Otay ODUs Valley Planning Area. llis property is S$ITOunded on three sides by Otay Ranch property (Villages Two and Three). 7-.19 ---_.__.__._-~-_.- ----~-_._._- ~. < I - "..J- ~ ' /I ..." ,,) .-. -. .... t;.? /;' ;' It ; ~) I i " , . II I i ~ \ . ~- ";,::1 : ..,~ . = r --. '-.-~,- ! ~ . 7' ------ ::~, -------¡¡,,"y'_ : \', I '-, .y i\ )J.' \.~ : _ ' .' 1\ -___-L- -" ' \ I - ;.J." \\ I fJ \- --, I ~ L ) I I I " r -y-- I : "'. I ' _______ . 1 I \, I / , ~ - . ~~--=,~ I ~ " '- F ~ ~"--=-~ . .. ---==:Õ~- .~ ,. - --- - -- =' - ~ /- I I f Þ. Y ~ €\E R V 0 I R ~~ , 01 I P '. I \.0 0'" ( '1 I i I I I I ,\ I I I ¡ i I " , - I ! , : ¡------t-- , " I :; I CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT WCATOR APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT C) ADDRESS: North of lower Otay Re.ervoir Request: GPA for Low density (0 - 3 du lac) on 20 acres in San Diego County. SCALE: FILE NUMBER: 9" .:JP EXHIBIT 3-A NORTH NONE GPA - 95 - 01 ____._'m·___..______._____________,.____._____..._~._.._~_._,__ _ ____. __"_" __~_.____.__."___________.__+ - I , 0 ! · ~ · · --w------_---..i..- i , I I - I I- I i : I , ! ----- -- I I , ---~----I i r Y1 Rt:\t:RV01R ..-- I f · Y I 0 I EP 0'" i \. I I I I I· I I -- I i f----~-- I CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT C) ADDRESS: North ofOtai Lakes Rd. and Request: GPA for open space on Lower Otay esen'oir 28.6 acres in San Diego County. SCALE: FILE NUMBER: 9" J I NORTH NONE GPA - 95 - 02 EXHIBIT 3-B --------_._--_....~.._---_...~...~-_..-_.._--~-----_.,...--.----- - --_.._._,.~--~-,-_." ..--.------ __,_,__'.______,"", _"______m~___ / . SOUTHWESi·'"'~--~ø· COl,.LEGE \\.=:''::;. .,.. j" -" .~. p~ ft~' _. -,.., ' v~ ' ..; _' _' "./ A,' '!tt ' ..' I .- -~.,,,,,)' ._-.- - I - .....- c#~ ¡' I ... / / E;:::m~al ~, ~_. _ .... Th: PuÞlic I OIU Public " ¡ " I. / . -. \ ~. '" è( ?- m >... .... . - ... ... + .. - ~ , , , 0Iay LandtBI ' 250.59 ac. From: Open Space To: Public I aua.l-PubØc ... WåIr~lr 19.59 ac. From: ~ Medium RasldantiaI .. Th: Public I QUII8I-Pub/IC . .. ... . .. LEGEND .,':;,:' INDICATES PROJECT LOCATIONS ....... ~ ______ I _______ ---. ----..--.¡, ~ CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR ~ Otay Ranch I'ROJEÇT 0EBCIIIPT10N: ø Public Properties GENERAL PIAN AMENDMENT ::. Olav ~nch. Various non Request: General Plan Amendment . Baldwin Co. owned parcels ' SCAlE: FILE NUMBER' ~ "'.2 NORTH No Scale GPA .' 95 . 03 7 .... J EXHIBIT 3-C __'''_,,".__.__..~__._._..____,_._ ______~___.__." __~____w..._ _~.._,..,..._ ".,._.,._ .. .·w............__.....·......,..._______. ...__ Exhibit 4 Net Fiscal Impact Analysis Summary for Selected Years All Development Within the City I 1995 1999 I 2004 2009 I 2014 I 2019 I 2024 CITY General Fund Revenue 380,80 I 3 024,885 8,528,608 11,804.613 17,628,509 21,881,031 22,658,889 Less Exoenses (484,282) (4,164,062 19,861,406\ t13,458,587 (16,948,466 (18,301,247 (20,084,323 Net Impact (103,481) (1,139,177 11,332,798\ 11,653 974 680,043 2,578,784 2,574,566 Gas Tax Revenue 25,324 208,204 447,924 587,214 674,646 719,281 750,795 Net Impact 25,324 208,204 447,924 587,214 674,646 719,281 750,795 Combined (78,157) (930,973) (884,874) (1,066,760) 1,354,689 3,299,065 3,325,361 Impact COUNTY .... . General Fund Revenue 348,207 2,608,870 5,445,491 7,479,597 9,274,7980 10,482,822 13,114,472 Less EXPenses (140,835 (1,197,965 /2,801,99P (3,783,418\ (4,741,018 (5,400,991 (6,492,815 Net Imnact 207,372 1,410,905 2,643,500 3,696,179 4,533,772 5,081,831 6,621,657 Road Fund Revenue 27,076 222,611 478,918 627,846 721,328 769,051 978,295 Less EXDenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net Imnact 27,076 222,611 478,918 627,846 721,328 769,051 978,295 Combined 234,448 1,633,516 3,122,418 4,324,025 5,255,100 5,850,882 7,599,952 Imnact 9- ;I'J ____.____..".__"m.'____· EXIDBIT 5 MEMORANDUM March 2, 1995 File OR-002 TO: Jeny Jamriska, Special Planning Projects Manager, Otay Ranch FROM: William A Ullrich, Senior Civil Engineer /tJ IIAJ. SUBJECT: Responses to Public Comments and Planning Commissioners Regarding the Otay Ranch Sphere of Influence DRAINAGE ISSUES Three Bonita residents, Stan Waid, GeOljean Jensen and Murial Watson, raised issues relating to drainage within the Bonita area ( see Exhibit "A") After the hearing a letter rrom J.K. Evans indicated that the Good Shepherd Church at Willow and Bonita Road had law suits pending relating to drainage concerns (see Exhibit "B"). The residents indicated that the EastLake and Salt Creek projects had created their drainage problems on Central Avenue. Planning Commissioner Salas questioned whether EastLake development caused or exacerbated the flooding in the area. Staff has researched the concerns and have the following response: Sunnvside Basin (Central Creek) L The EastLake and Salt Creek projects contain 304 acres within the Sunnyside Drainage Basin which contribute to Central Creek. The entire basin contains 4,073 acres. The 304 acres represent only 7.5% of the basin. When the portion ofEastlake I west of the SR-125 corridor was developed, the City required the developer to construct a detentionldesilting basin to reduce the ultimate 100-year peakflow runoffrrom the development and to trap silt. Subsequent to the construction of the desilting facility, the area east ofSR-125 was developed and about one-half of that area drains into the desiltingldetention basin. The developer again was required to reduce the 100-year peakflow runoff to that which existed prior to development. In addition to the drainage facility mentioned above, the City requires all external slopes and other areas, which will not be dev¢loped, to be landscaped or hydro seeded to reduce erosion. The EastLake I EIR (which included the Salt Creek I area) contained the following statement "An additional effect of the project would be to decrease sediment loads in drainages. Due to development of streets, yards, landscaped areas and drainage system, the amount of silt and debris produced by the site will be significantly less than with the current agricultural use of the property. " 9~ :J ¿I ".._..._--_.~._._---------~-----_._._.~-_._._._._~~----~--~---_._.. . OT A Y RANCH SPHERE 2 3/2/95 The combination of the desilting/detention facility, erosion control measures and a small area ITom the City contributing to Central Creek, results in little to no impact to the Sunnyside Basin problems. 2, Drainage problems occurred in this area before Eastlake I/Salt Creek I developments were constructed. A local Civil Engineer (Mr. James Algert), who has been in the area for many years, has studied the situation and indicated that the main problem in the area can be attributed to the channel being too flat to carry flows oflarger storms (over a 5-10 year storm). All of the improvements which exist today along Central Avenue were constructed by developments within the jurisdiction of the County. DRAINAGE ISSUES AT BONITA ROAD/WilLOW ROAD During recent years, the drainage system flowing ITom the east toward the Sweetwater River has deposited silt on the east side of Bonita Road near the Good Shepherd Church and Bonita Store. Some of the silt was generated by Rancho Del Rey SPA II development. McMillin Development has constructed a desilting/detention facility to eliminate any increase in silt as a result of their project. That facility was completed in 1993. The facility was designed to retain the silt ITom the project and reduce the 100-year runoff to that which occurred prior to development. The City now removes the silt at the outlet of the drainage culvert that crosses Bonita Road near the Bonita Store after almost ever storm. There have been no drainage problems this year in this location. DRAINAGE IMP ACTS AT WILLOW STREET AND SWEETWATER RIVER Two years ago, when the heavy rains fel~ this area was inundated due to vegetation growing down stream of the bridge which caused the water to back up and silt to be deposited each time heavier rains occurred. The City, through a grant ITom the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), will be removing some of the vegetation and most of the silt as allowed by the Fish and Game. Some of the buildingslhouses on both sides of the golf course have periodically been inundated by the larger storms such as those which occurred in 1980, 1983 and 1993. The Central Avenue crossing of the Sweetwater River often floods with smaller ITequency storms. Pictures submitted by Mr. Watson . show portions of the Chula Vista Golf Course under water. Since the golf course is in the Sweetwater River floodway, it is not unexpected to see the area inundated. ANNEXATION ISSUES RELATED TO SEWER SERVICE Two letters were read into the Planning Commission record I.Tom Francisco and Luisa Nieto and Martha and Pedro Prado who reside respectively at 4348 and 4358 Acacia Avenue in Bonita. Both letters refer to the City of Chula Vista requiring annexation prior to connection to a City sewer line. In addition, the Prado letter indicates that they are required to pay over $7,000 for that connection, When Bonita Long Canyon subdivision was developed, the developer was required to install a sewer line in Acacia Avenue to serve the development. The existing properties along Acacia, which were 9-J5 --_......._~---_..-.__..~-_.._-----_..-.__._.,_._.,.-.--,.._-'.'. - - -------- "~-'-""""---'-''''----' .....- -. -"--,-------.--. -----....-- · OT A Y RANCH SPHERE 3 3/2/95 developed in the County, were on septic systems. Some of those systems have subsequently failed and the owners were required to connect to a sewer by the Health Department. The sewer to which these properties can connect is a city owned and maintained sewer system. Under current City Policy 570-02 adopted on June 2, 1992, the owner is required to do one of the following: IF CAP ABLE TO ANNEX TO THE CITY ( Contiguous to Citv boundary) The connectee must first annex to the City of Chula Vista or execute an annexation agreement. If an annexation agreement is utilized, the connectee is required to deposit with the City an amount equal to three times the current sewer capacity charge to be used to purchase the right to use City services in the event that annexation should fail. The owner is also required to pay the capacity charge in addition to the charge to purchase the right to connect. The current charge is $2,220; therefore, the connectee is required to pay $8,880 plus any other costs associated with the connection such as lateral installation costs, Upon annexation, $6,660 is returned to connectee. If annexation fails, the City may claim the deposit as payment for the ' right to connect to utilize City services. Total up tront cost of this situation would exceed $10,000, IF UNABLE TO ANNEX TO THE CITY ( Non-contiwous to Citv boundary) The owner shall enter into an "Annexation and Disconnection Agreement" with the City. In addition, the owner shall pay the current City of Chula Vista sewer capacity charge and a fee of twice the current sewer capacity charge which is deposited into the City General Fund. Other costs associated with connection to the City sewer must be paid by the owner such as the sewer lateral installation costs. The owner is also required to deposit with the City one-half the estimated annexation fees. This deposit will be returned when annexation is complete. The total up tront cost for this procedure would be more than $7,000, In addition to obtaining a pennit trom the' City, the owners must receive approvalfi'om LAFCO before the City can allow connection. Both the Nietos and the Prados are contiguous to the City boundary. Another owner (Sarris), who has a need to connect to the City sewer, i$ located at 4375 Acacia Avenue, which is on the north side of Acacia Avenue. That property is not contiguous to the City boundary and could not annex at this . time. A proposed policy change is currently being studied as a result of the Acacia Avenue situation, Staff has been working with LAFCO and the Spring Valley Sanitation District (SVSD) on the proposed policy change. Once LAFCO and SVSD have approved the proposed change, staff'wiIl bring the item to the City Council for approval. l' ;:¡ ¿ .- ..--..-.-.--.-."------ -_.._..._-----"_.~----------_.._------_.- - -,_.,_....-----_.._~---~.,--.-.._---_.._._-'--_.- OT A Y RANCH SPHERE 4 3/2/95 INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES Mr. Stan Waid and Mr. Michael J. Roark made comments relating to infi'astructure at the February 22,1995 Planning Comnùssion meeting. Mr, Waid's comment related to approval ofOtay Ranch without proper infÌ'astructure and Mr. Roark's concern was related to restricting development in Eastlake until there was a north/south corridor (SR-125 or equivalent} Following is a response to each statement: INFRASTRUCTURE REOUlREMENTS Improvement and grading plans are reviewed and approved at the final map stage. Those plans are prepared to meet City standards and to comply with applicable conditions of approval and environmental concerns. In addition, some impact fees are paid at that time, Other impact fees are paid at issuance of building pennits such as school, Residential Construction Tax, Transportation and Public Facility Development Impact and sewer capacity fees, Adequate infTastructure is required to be provided with all development within the City of Chula Vista prior to occupancy of structures through the construction of the infi'astructure or payment of fees. If adequate inITastructure is not available as required by the City's growth management thresholds, the City can stop development until the inadequacies are remedied, NORTIJ/SOU1H TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR There has been no specific City Council Policy which restricted development in EastLake beyond the first phase until a north/south roadway was in place. The City did have the Growth Management Threshold Standards which were in place at the time that EastLake I was processed. Those standards would have restricted development if thresholds had been exceeded. The Council has adopted a SR-125 Development Impact fee to address the need for a facility within the SR-125 corridor. The fee was established as a safeguard to provide a facility if the tollroad was not constructed. 9- :J ? _ _.__U_"_..~._____~__·"__·__,··_,,···~_,··__·_u -------. ...---'-.---.. ------...,.--.--------. , ,- \f) ~ at ~ ~ o v w- 2§ ~:.:c '2~ - 'l\- Ð' _ Oc:Q - u.-j: o )( , W 2 o - t- ~ « '" v \ 0 ... I .: \ ..... .,.\ .,.'" "\ \ 9-JY' . FEB-24-1995 139:53 FROM TO 691'5171 P.Ø1 .- j . 1 . TO WHOEVER SEES THIS FAX FIRST, CAN YOU PLEASE MAKE COPIES AND DISTRIS'JTE TO FEOPLE BELOW? I DO NC T DO THIS FOR A LIVING. THANKS. \\ 1/ EXHIBt T B J.K. EVANS 3350 WATERCREST COURT BONITA, CA 91902 595-5076 FEBRUARY 24, 1995 CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL VIA FACS/MILLE 476-5379 275 4TH AVENUE I CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 MAYOR SHIRLEY HORTON DEPUTY MAYOR. C.OUNCILMAN JERRY RINDONE COUNCILMAN BOB FOX ! COUNCILMAN STEVE PADILLA I COUNCILMAN JOHN MOOT i CHU¡.A VISTA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION VIA FACSIMILLE 691-5171 _ SUSAN FULLER I TI-IOMAS MARTIN I JOHN RAY MARY SALAS : FRANK TARANTINO WILLIAM TUCHSCHER RE: CITY PLANNING COMMISION MEETING DATED 2-22·95 i i , DEAR REPRESENTATIVES: , REGARDING THE WATER DRAINAGE FROM CHULA VISTA INTO BONITA PeR GROUND SATURATION, THOUGH IT IS CLEAR THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA IS AQUIRING PROPERTY IN BONITA PER THIS ISSUE (VIA UTILITY HOOK-UP ANNEXATION), IT WAS NOT ADDRESSED WITH ANY $rATEMENT BY LAFCO OR THE CITY MANAGER BECAUSE: I - ,. WATER EXPERTS WERE NOT PRESENT. , I I 2. IT ONLY PERTAINED TO THE SPHERE OFLAFCO'S INFLUENCE STUDY INDIRECTLY, I JUST SO YOU ALL KNOW, THE CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD, EPI$COPAL PARISH AT WILLOW AND BONITA ROAD HAS TWO I.AW SUITES PENDING AGAINST CONTRACTORS. THESE CONTRACTORS WERE PERMITTED BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY PLAIIINING COMMISSION TO BUILD WITHOUT ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. SINOERelY, ~7~? . EVANS CITIZENS TO PRESERve BONITA VALLEY, INC. 9".3' ~~--_._-----.._. .._,-"._--~._-~~~_.._---,._, --'-'---'--'-~------'--'---"----~--"- Resource Conservation Commission -2- Februarv 16. 1995 3. Review of EIR-94-03, Sphere of Influence ) Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid introduced the project, advising the commission that the Ûtay Ranch project was a joint planning project between the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego, and that both jurisdictions had adopted the same plan. He advised that the EIR for the Sphere of Influence study had been prepared for LAFCO, and introduced Special Projects Planning Manager Jerry Jamriska and Bruce McIntyre of lettieri-McIntyre. Mr. Jamriska noted that the EIR for the Otay Ranch General Development Plan still exists and is referred to in the Sphere report. He stated that the project's environmental impacts were basically the same, but that the Sphere EIR looks just at the impacts of moving the Sphere boundary. Mr. Jamriska noted that the Sphere of Influence simply defmes an area that will require urban levels of services in the future, and that the last Sphere study had been done in 1985. He presented exhibits depicting the current sphere boundaries as well as those proposed in this report, which focuses primarily on the Otay Ranch property. Mr. Bruce McIntyre of lettieri-McIntyre stated that there are four issues analyzed: land use, agriculture, public services, and fiscal impact. Mr. McIntyre noted that since the City and County regulations for the Ûtay Rancho project are the same, there is very little change in impacts. He reviewed the EIR response to the above-referenced issues, stating that the overall density affected by this EIR would decrease by approximately 250 units. With respect to agriculture, it was stated that the Otay Ranch land is not considered prime I agricultural. Mr. McIntyre stated that on the issue of public services the Ûtay Ranch project is very specific and it requires public facilities plans, thus ensuring that facilities be in place when they are needed. He advised that there is an obstacle with one of the planning areas related to water service; however, he added that this issue would exist whether the property is in the County or the City. Mr. McIntyre stated that in the area of fiscal impact, agreements had been reached which balanced out the long-term fiscal impacts on both the City and County. Committee Ouestions/Discussion Commissioner Marquez commented that the issues reviewed seemed not to involve specific resources and land uses. She added that information in the EIR (page S-3) called for an increase in residential density of 162 units, which conflicted with the density reduction that Mr. McIntyre had mentioned. Mr. McIntyre stated that he might have been wrong and would look into the inconsistency. Commissioner Fisher asked how a condition of split jurisdictions would affect programs like the Preserve plan; Mr. Jamriska responded that the Preserve owner/manager was required to be selected prior to adoption of the first specific plan, and that a funding plan must be in place prior to the SPA plan to ensure the fmancial success of the Preserve. He added that the Preserve lands would be conveyed as entitlements were granted for development. Mr. Fisher also questioned certain land uses depicted in various maps within the EIR, stating that the University J site, for example, seemed to move around. Mr. Jamriska stated that the Ûtay Ranch General Development Plan actually amended the City's General Plan, although it was not reflected in the map within the EIR. Mr. Fisher stated that he found the maps in the EIR difficult to read and compare, and suggested that they be clarified. 9-~tJ - _..._....._~"----_....- .,.-.-.------.... .'~----'- _ _ ___.._."____ __._.__.._.n____'.,_,________·___··_ · Resource Conservation Commission -3- Februarv 16. 1995 ( In response to further questions regarding the University site, Mr. Jamriska explained the issues involved with the University site and further explained the environmental review porcedures for ensuing development applications, stating that these will include the specific resource studies. Commissioner Marquez asked about the County Resource Protection Ordinance; Mr. Jamriska explained the ordinance, indicating that the Otay Ranch plans surpass the intent of this ordinance. The Multiple Species Conservation Plan was discussed. Commissioner Hall asked if the smaller parcels might be treated as infùl projects; Mr. Reid pointed out that these parcels are small relative to the Otay Ranch project, but are all multiple- acre parcels. He confirmed that with respect to any development proposals they would still be governed by CEQA. Ms. Hall questioned the placement of the industrial parcel, pointing out that once the landfill was full, it was supposed to be used as parks and open space. She also questioned school facilities in the Otay Ranch; Mr. Jamriska reviewed the schools planned throughout the project. Commissioner Marquez stated that she was not completely comfortable with the City's incurring a fIScal deficit for such a long period of time and counting on future tax revenues to recoup the loss. Mr. Kim Kilkinney of Baldwin spoke to the fiscal issue, stating that he wished to dispel the impression that the Otay Ranch project was a fIScal loser in the flI'st years. He stated that any deficit would be a function of the tax agreements worked out between the City and the County only, and that according to fIScal impact studies, neither jurisdiction needed to \ experience a fIScal deficit because of this project. MSUC (Hall/Marquez) (4-0) to recommend that the Planning Commission certify EIR-94-03. 4. Review of Historical Site Sign Schedule Members agreed that the sequence/schedule of signs as proposed was acceptable. CHAIR'S COMMENTS Chair Burrascano stated that she still had not heard from Michael Guerrero. Mr. Reid noted that Guerrero's attendance record now made it impossible for him to meet the required 75% meeting attendance requirement. Commissioner Marquez stated that having only four members was constraining and affected votes, since a unanimous vote is thus required for a recommendation of approval. COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS Commissioner Marquez stated that she would like to respond as a commission to Joe Ghougassian's letter of recommendation. Mr. Reid advised that for commission action, the item would have to be I agendized. Commissioners chose to respond individually to the letter in order to have their comments on the record immediately. Commissio_ner Hall felt that Mr. Ghougassian had found the commission valuable when he needed support to oppose development in the Sweetwater Valley near his home, and pointed out that although 9-~1 _,_._·_.u~_ _ ,'_ __.__.,.,. -~..-- - - - .--- .. ".._._---~.,._._-.--~ ..__.'. PC Minutes -2- February 22, 1995 ITEM 1: PUBUC HEARING: CHULA VISTA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE DRAFT ) EIR-94-03 Environmental Review Coordinator Reid began the presentation, noting that the environmental review report covered an area which had been involved in much of the Otay Ranch consideration of a General Development Plan, which had been jointly adopted by the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego. The land use assumptions for the bulk of the project area is the same for both the City and the County. A change in the Sphere boundary would in most instances not result in a change in the land use assumptions and the impacts that would result would be primarily insignificant. Mr. Reid stated that the Em was primarily prepared for LAFCO and focused on such issues as the delivery of public services. The Resource Conservation Commission had voted to recommend certification of the Em. Correspondence received since the staff report had been given to the Planning Commissioners at this meeting and would be responded to in the fmal Em, along with any comments received during the public hearing. He then introduced Jerry Jamris1ca, Special planning Project Manager for the Otay Ranch project and the Sphere study. Mr. Jamriska stated that a Sphere of Influence information sheet had been given to the Commissioners, which tried to identify certain key questions that Were asked at a public forum presentation to the community several weeks before. Mr. Jamriska noted the initial Sphere of the City of Chula Vista was. adopted by LAFCO in 1985, and pointed out the Sphere of Influence area, which is still current. In July 1993, LAFCO authorized the Executive Oficer upon request of the City to conduct an initial update study of the potential addition to the Otay ) Ranch study area. Mr. Jamriska then gave an overview of the proposal, noting that the four planning areas would add 12,718 acres to the City of Chula Vista, if approved, and pointed out the five General Plan amendments which were proposed to be processed concum:ntly with the Sphere update. Senior Planner Rick Rosaler detailed the four planning areas, noting that General Plan designations had been applied to the Satterla property. The wedges drained into the Lower Otay Reservoir which are owned by the City of San Diego. Mr. Rosaler, referring to Table 3-C in the Em, stated that for the most part, 'beeR"'" the City and the County had agreed on the Otay Ranch General Development Plan Subregional Plan, there were no changes in land use intensity.. The additional properties which were not part of the Ranch would intensify and, in some cases, deintensify based on the General Plan designation. Mr. Rosaler introduced Bruce Mcintire. a principal of the firm of Lettieri-Mcintire and Associates, who prepared the environmental impact report. Mr. Mcintire discussed the environmental impact report, noting that the change in the Sphere boundaries did not have much effect on the ultimate land use. The environmental impacts, which Were clearly identified on the Otay Ranch Em, would happen whether or not the boundary changed. They could develop to the same degree under the County. He noted a process allowed by CEQA called "incorporation by reference" had been used. They had drawn upon the information used in the Otay Ranch Em, as well as the City's General Plan Program Em. Mr. McIntire then summarized the conclusions of the CDVironmental impact report. I - 9...J.j .,2.- .. ..-....-.--.. .' ._-~-,-----_.__.-_...- -"--"-".---..-.- "--...---.._._-+~- PC Minutes -3- February 22, 1995 I( Mr. Jamriska stated that staff recommended that the public hearing be conducted and closed, with direcûon to staff to prepare a final environmental impact report that would be presented at a joint meeting before the City Council and the Planning Commission on March 14. This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. Chair Tuchscher called the Ïll'St speaker, Stan Waid, representing the Bonita Highlands Homeowners Association and Sweetwater Valley Civic Association, Stan Wald, 5617 Galloping Way, Bomta, asked if staff would show a certain slide showing the area in which he lives. Chair Tuchscher asked if Mr. Waid represented the Sweetwater Valley Civic Association, and if they had taken any kind of formal action. Mr. Waid stated that they had asked him to represent them at this meeting and the one the week before. Chair Tuchscher asked if the same was true of the Bonita Homeowners Association. Mr. Waid stated that he might be called the resident manager of the homeowners association since he had lived there 20 years. Chair Tucbscher asked if either group had taken any formal action. Mr. Waid replied that they ( bad not. Mr. Waid said that in addition to the Sphere of Influence, the Bonita residents are impacted tremendously by decisions by the planning Commission and the City Council in Chula Vista and the County. Two years ago, Central Aveoue bec,m.. a river floor1ing about 20 homes downstream by the Bonita Post Office, primarily because of Jack of planning by the County, and by the City of Chula Vista in approving the EastLakc Development without taking into account what was going to happen to the nmoff from that development. . Central Creek was a small area which became a river. As a result, the homeowners downstream filed suit against the County to dredge out Central Creek. The County required the Bonita Highlands property owners to dredge it out at a cost of $20,000. Mr. Waid stated that at the 1985 LAFCO meeting, they were given basically two alternatives. They were given the choice of being put in the National City Sphere of Influence and a co-possibility of maybe the San Diego Sphere of Influence or the Chula Vista Sphere of Influence. Mr. Waid had chosen the City of Chula Vista, but said it was probably a mistake on his part. He was concerned about infrastructure not being in place, traffic flow, the flow of the water. At the public f011lD1 held a week or so before, they wanted to de- sphere but were told that there is DOtbÏIIIg in LAFCO'. charter to allow a de-sphere. Mr. Waid said they would like to de-sphere, because they don't feel they are getting their fair shake in the community . Jeanne Evans, 3350 Watercrest, 80. 91902, read two letters regarding the Chula Vista Sphere of Influence Draft EIR, Lot No. 74, Block B, Bonita Hills. Francisco and Luisa Nieto, 4348 Acacia, Bonita 91902, said they were having problems with their septic tank, which was an inconvenience as well as a health hazard. They did not want to lose their zoning privileges 9- ¥:I ~."--""_. -,~.._-----~~~~~"-_.~."..._-_..._-_.._-_.."'- ._--_.,.._-~_.._---~-_._-_.__.- ...~-,-- PC Minutes -4- February 22, 1995 by annexing to COOla Vista. It would be a detriment to the value of their property; therefore, ) they disputed the Sphere of Influence Study and did not approve it. They asked for a copy of the EIR and requested more time to respond to the EIR. The second letter was from Martha and Pedro Prado, 4358 Acacia, Bonita 92902, regarding Block 75, Block B, Bonita Hills, stating they had not received copies of the EIR although its text may negatively influence their property value in the years to come. They and their neighbors were being forced to spend over $7,000 each to have decent utilities in their homes. This was not an issue when the property was originally built, because the County had adequate drainage in past years. 1bey were told no other option to build another septic tank was available. 1bey disputed text or any reference to the text of the Sphere of Influence study by future plAnnil1g zoning agencies that in any way impeded the current zoning rights of their property. 1bey wished their property to remain in Bonita, not Chula Vista. Ms. Evans had the names of 28 people that attended the public fonun that was held previously, and noted items in dispute of the Sphere of Influence study, as follows. 1be legend does not indicate any measurement of miles or kilometers. The legend is practically illegible, too small; . legend does not include a train corridor; proposed toll way SR-l25 not labeled ptopcrly as a proposed SR-125; Sphere map has Proctor Valley Road labeled as San Miguel Road; Sphere city border is ambiguous; only the San Diego city border is labeled; nowhere on the map is the ChuIa Vista city border labeled; Bonita is not labeled on the map; City border A,.t"A1ly goes outside the Sphere of Influence line-how can the City not have influence over its own territory? ) This is seen in the National City area around Fourth Street. Georjean Jensen, 3655 Proctor Valley Road, Bonita, said she is a member of the SweetWater Community plal1ning Group, and the ørouP could DOt support the expansion of the Chula Vista Sphere of Influence for the followiDg reasons. ChuIa Vista had demonsttated a lack of responsibility in the current developments of EastLake traffic management and Salt Lake drainage mitigation in Ccntral Creek. 1be OIay Ranch plan as approved by ChuIa Vista had little regard for the regional impacts I$sociated with its circulation plans and total dependence on the automobile. Ms. lensen stated that Chula Vista historically had resented the SweetWater's area reluctance to annex en masse and demonstrated it whenever SweetWater residents and groups commented negatively on projects which bave negative influence. 1be SweetWater Community Planning Group requested that Chula Vista eJ<ami"" past AtmI'!Utions and developments with respect to the signiflC8Dt impacts on neighboring communities. When these conflicts have been resolved and mitigated, then perhaps it would be appropriate to consider lIOIDe limited expansion of the Sphere of Influence. Chair Tuchseber DOted that the planniqg Commission had a copy of 10hn Hammond's letter to that effect. Muriel Watson, 3120 Anderson Street, Bonita, showed the Commissioners some pictures which she had taken the morning after the big rain the previous week. She said she was also a member of the SweetWater Planni"'g Board. Their Chairman was at another meeting trying to protect wbat they felt was a legitimate community plan. She said she was a member of that -9-1/'( __.. .____~~__._. _._ ---'___-.0'-- .__ ____.._ _ __ _._0_ ___ .-------- ----.------------_._----- PC Minutes -5- February 22, 1995 ~ board when the plan was updated and submitted to the County Board of Supervisors, which they had accepted and then proceeded to implement and use the priorities that had been instilled into that plan, She asked if one planning group was more important than another. Since the Sweetwater Planning Board had submitted its plan, and it was accepted by the County, she did not understand why another group should come aboard, dismiss their plan, and not recognize their plan. In the handout they had been given, it sounded like in 1985 they were delighted to be included in the Sphere of Influence. She stated that they were not. They protested then. LAFCO held an election, and they elected in the Bonita Sunnyside area not to annex to the City of Chula Vista. Ms, Watson said that the feeling remains, and they would hope that their community plan would be respected just as highly as any other community plan. She said that it was her impression that although they may be a smaller unit, in the democratic society, that same smaller unit's priorities and provisions should be respected as much as a bigger and . broader group. She thought the City of Chula Vista should be in the Bonita community sphere of influence. Michael J, Roark, 3645 Proctor Valley Road, Bonita, spoke on behalf of the Sweetwater Community Planning Group as a member and in support of the letter that the committee had submitted through the Chairman, Mr. Hammond. He said the study was a hybrid. It excluded Bonita from consideration. Bonita had voted down annexation three times. It was not going to be annexed to the City of Chula Vista. Mr. Roark said the Sphere of Influence took on an unusual meaning. Chula Vista had made a commitment that there would be no more I development outside of the first phase of EastLake until there was a north/south corridor from the second border crossing to the eastern pan of the County, 80 there would be access to development of what was hoped would be the "nha"".ement of the region. Mr. Roark stated that it hadn't happened. None of that was addressed in the report. It was extremely short in its foresight in not addressing those issues. An annexation of these properties at this time without proper environmental, access, and roads and movement for the population in a way that would ....ha"".e the environment. The shortcomings were valid, and in this particular report, Bonita should be excluded. It should be considered that Bonita not be any longer in the ·Sphere of Influence· of Chula Vista because it would never be a part of the City of Chula Vista-at least by the current population. He suggested that the EIR be oPened up for further public comment, and the report be referred back to further study before taking any further action. Mr. Roark said a north/south corridor was needed in the area that would benefit the truck traffic. The valley between San Miguel and Mother Miguel was an obvious location that did not take any homes, that would have the most economic impact to the community and the least environmental impact to the community. CalTrans was not proceeding at this point with any schedules that they promised with that EIR report. Many of the projects that were on the books no longer had the applicants in business or the landowners there. Emphasis needed to be put on connecting the second border crossing north in an easterly route that will provide what was needed for that region and opening up the truck traffic north, east, and not in downtown San Diego or through the City of Chula Vista except where there is reasonable open space, and not back into the City. These factors were not considered anywhere in this report. ! No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. 9-1> --. ._.._._-_.._._-_..,...-..._-~--_._-- .."--.- PC Minutes -6- February 22, 1995 Commissioner Salas stated that she realized that the pwpose of this meeting was to discuss ) whether or not to recommend the inclusion of Planning Area 1, 2, 3, and 4 into the Sphere of Influence and not so much of a discussion of whether Bonita should be removed from the Sphere of Influence; however, she thought some of the concerns of the residents should be answered. In reference to Mr. Stan Waid's concern in EastLake development causing or exacerbating flooding in the Bonita Valley, Commissioner Salas asked if there was any back-up documentation that supports the fact that had indeed occurred. She had been a lifelong resident of this area and could recall that anytime there were heavy rains, there was flooding in that area. Chair Tuchscher asked staff if EastLake is in the same drainage basin as the Central Creek, or how that worked from a drainage standpoint. Mr. Jamriska explained that staff was not prepared to answer the quesûon regarding the flooding situation. Chair Tuchscher asked, in reference to the Sphere, if the flooding issue was pertinent to the study and to the planning areas on which they were being asked to make a decision. Mr. Jamriska replied that it was a valid question; however, proper staff was not in attendanr.e to answer the question. Commissioner SaIas stated that she understood no studies had been done, but asked if by ) common observation, staff had noûced an increase in the flnnding. She recalled flooding in the area in 1982 when she worked in the area. EastLake was not there at the time. Chair Tuchscher stated that staff had indicated they did not have that type of data. Hestated that from a Sphere of Influence and General Plan standpoint, this was an EDgineering issue that involved hydrology and other issues associated with ongoing development and perhaps it could be better dealt with during a workshop meeting whereby Growth Management Oversight and the appropriate staff people would be available to deal with some of the issues. Chair Tuchscher concurred that the issues that were menûoned should be noted and dealt with at the apþlopriate time. He asked if there were other r.nmmeuts. Commissioner Martin stated there were good people who felt Chula Vista had treated them poorly and had not done things that were implied. That seemed to be their jusûfication for not having anything to do with Chula Vista or being within the Sphere of Influence, yet the Sphere of Influence really is just a planning tool. He felt more direct input from the residents would be more important. The Sphere of Influence would be a tool used to prevent two or three agencies from malri11g the same decision over the same piece of plC1pC:rty. Mr. Jamriska concurred with C(>nImiosioner Martin, adding that the City could adequately plan for the future development and extensiC;1D of public services without any duplication of that effort by other agencies. ?-~t -----_._--~~_._--_..~._-~-- --- ,..-.-...--.--.------------.----..---- PC Minutes -7- . February 22, 1995 ; ", Commissioner Martin stated that a letter had been received from Mr. John Hammond. He did not agree with some of his statements, and asked how their concerns could be addressed. Chair Tuchscher stated that it was within the abilities of the Sweetwater and Bonita Communities to lobby and apply with LAFCO to be excluded from Chula Vista's Sphere should they decide to do that. It was not within the scope of the Planning Commission during this meeting to make that decision or that recommendation to City Council. If they desired to be excluded from Chula Vista's Sphere, he encouraged those groups to have that discussion with LAFCO and ascertain whether they think it is possible or feasible or economically within reason for them to pursue that. The task in front of the Planning Commission, within the scope of this study, was to look at the areas mentioned and analyzed within the study and make a decision as to what the Commission should recommend and then follow with the meeûng on March 14 with the City Council. Commissioner Fuller, regarding the DeGraaf parcel in Planning Area 1, the designation of which was proposed to be open space, asked if the corridor between the villages was all indicated as open space and if that was the purpose of designating the DeGraaf property open space. Mr. Jamriska noted that this was the adopted General Development Plan for the City of ChuIa Vista, as well as for the County of San Diego. The properties to the east, west, and south were 'I open space and potentially part of the open space reserve as part of the Otay Ranch Project. , Mr. Jamriska said it was currently planned by the City's General Plan as open space, which would allow one dwelling unit. The Sphere Study was not proposing to change the General Plan designation. The only addition was that the DeGraaf property would be incorporated into the City's Sphere of Influence. Commissioner Ray, regarding plannil'lg Area 4, asked about a comment in one of the letters which had been left on the dias-the issue of phasing ofanneX8Ûon. Is there a reason that some of the respondents were still concerned. Mr. Jamriska replied that he believed the comment had been made by the County of San Diego, Department of Planning and Land Use (DPLU). Prior to the environmental impact report being prepared, they received the f1l'St study draft of the Sphere of Influence document. The DPLU had taken the draft report to the Board of Supervisors for general direction to a Board of Supervisors subcommittee. The Board of Supervisors determined, pursuant to staff's recommendation, that the Otay Ranch Sphere of Influence and correspondingly the annexation, should occur by SPA by SPA process instead of the entire p1anniflg Area 1,2,3, and 4. Mr. Jamriska stated that they made that deb:rmination without looking at any of the enviromnental effects of the provision of services as ¢OntaiN'1l within the environm.....al impact report. 1bat same position remaiN'1l. Mr. Jamriska stated that ChuIa Vista staff did not agree with that. The purpose behind recommending the entire Otay Valley parcel to be iDcorporated into the Chula Vista Sphere was that staff could ~loperly plan for the provision of utilities. If it is known .that an area is within Chula Vista's Sphere and will eventually be annexed to the City of Chula Vista, adequate provisions could be made for the extension of utilities to serve that parcel. He felt there were other reasons the County of San Diego wanted to do that on a SPA by SPA basis. 1-¿J'} -"._--~._-,_.,~--~._---_.._--_.- '___._.._.._,_n..__ ~ -- ---.- -- ._----~-_.__._._-~.~----- PC Minutes -8- February 22, 1995 Commissioner Ray asked staff to indicate the location of the Watson 'parcel, and questioned whether the increase in the use was insignificant. He believed the additional 200 units was the cumulative impact over the entire impact of the entire Sphere. Environmental Consultant McIntire concurred, reiterating that it was on a Sphere-wide basis and there was no major change. Commissioner Ray repeated that the issue before the Commission was the entire Sphere and the increase to the entire Sphere of Chula Vista's boundaries and the impacts Chula Vista had on the General Development Plan versus the County's General Development Plan and the net increases between those two documents. Again, Mr. McIntire concurred and noted that there would be subsequent environmental review of tentative maps. There were discretionary actions that would allow development to occur. Staff was looking at the programmatic level. Commissioner Ray stated that specifics would be addressed at a point in time when staff came forward with a General Development Plan or a planned tentative map. Mr. McIntire answered affirmatively. Commissioner Ray, refening to the LAFCO document, stated that there were some specific ) issues they addressed with specific language and typographical errors, or comments to those effects. He asked if those were going to be specifically addressed in the final environmental review report. Mr. Jamriska stated that staff would respond to all comments that were made at the meeting, as well as the comments made by COIDIIÛSsioner Salas, and written comments received. Commissioner Ray, referring to planni1\¡ Area 4, asked about the dispute on Planning Area 4. Mr. Jamriska answered that the dispute basically centered around the area that is within the City of San Diego. The City of San Diego staff and City Council subcommittee on land use and housing took an action that the parcel would best be served from the City of San Diego. The City of Chula Vista felt that when LaMedia is constructed, the prime access to the þloperty and the service of utilities would all be from the City of ChuIa Vista. Mr. Jamriska stated that the parcel is not planned to be developed in the very foreseeable future, but probably at the end of the IS-year timespan. Staff felt that it could stil1 be part of the City of ChuIa Vista's Sphere. There were several other parcels which could be resolved in the future, if staff went ahead with this proposal. Mr. Jamriska believed the City Manager was desirous of beginning ðiscussions and negotiations on those boundary conflicts. Commissioner Ray then asked for a clarification on the IS-year analysis of what the Sphere is. He said the influence of the IS-year buildout was where the Sphere ended its analysis. ?'¥7/ --_._'-"-'--"-~'-'-""- _....._-~---_._.- ---- -_.~._.._._.."_.,... .-.__._--~~---- -- PC Minutes -9- February 22, 1995 ( Mr. Jamriska stated that was a general policy direction that LAFCO and staff followed. Commissioner Ray noted that the traffic analysis or specifically the SR-I25 issue as a non-toll road, Phase 1 of the SR-125 was only assumed to be adequate' based on those same plans for 15 years. Chair Tuchscher replied that was the Interim 125 solution. Commissioner Ray was concerned with the timing between the interim and the permanent SR- 125 between that 12th, 15th and 18th year, because of crossing over the threshold. There could be a major disaster in the economy which would cause almost no development for the Otay Ranch and the need for 125 might dissipate altogether, or there could be a more rapid increase with facilities being put in and an accelerated need for 125 coming in. He was uncomfortable that that issue was being addressed on a worst case basis of .......ti...g that highway to be built on a more rapid pace. Mr. Jamriska responded that staff was in the process of doing transportation model runs as a result of the specific plan submittal for SPA I for the Otay Ranch project. That would look at various scenarios and the consttuction of interim 125 or permanent 125 would be one of the factors taken into consideration. He stated if there was any delay or impact, certain other improvements would have to occur to resolve any traffic impacts that may be C81lseð by the development of the SPA I. In addition, the City is looking at some type of phasing for the - transportation buildout of 125. Traffic model information as it relates to SPA I and the effect on 125 would be available when the SPA comes before the pla......il1g Commi~sion sometime in June. Commissioner Ray asked if, based on a Sphere study, that needed to be considered in the p1anni...g Commission's decision for the Sphere of Influence study based on the fact that that modeling has not yet concluded. Mr. Jamriska explained that the Sphere was nothing more than a planni...g tool. It did not change any of the impacts associated with the land use. The same impacts associated with the Otay Ranch were going to exist, whe1!herit was in the County or in the City. Mr. Jamriska believed the planni...g Commission could proceed without the moo..1i11g being done, becauR the modeling was done already for the General Plan as part of the General Plan Development Plan ER, and all of that was taken into consideration. Staff would be revisiting those model runs as part of the SPA, as required by the GDP. At the present time, staff was only looking at extending that planni...g tool beyond the cunent sphere to the proposed sphere. Commissioner Ray asked if SR-I25 was not in a position to be built, anything beyond the interim facility, and there was a stop to consttuction or subsequent phases of the Baldwin Ranch, would that impact the proposed influence boundary. ( Mr. Jamrislca replied negatively. 9-¥1 - ______.._..._.____.__._____._. _____. _m __....... _ "---_...~_._.._-~._---,-- PC Minutes -10- February 22, 1995 ) Chair Tuchscher stated that any future development would be subject to all the growth ordinances currently in place, and the threshold standards, so as this developed out, those standards would apply to each phase, specific plan, tentative map, and at the point where the City's threshold standards could not be met, development would be stopped. He asked if staff concurred. Mr. Jamriska stated that was correct, whether it be EastLake, Otay Ranch, or San Miguel. Commissioner Tarantino understood the Commission's charge was to approve the inclusion of certain areas for planning purposes, mot to make decisions. He felt they were getting into specifics. He questioned how the approval of the Sphere of Influence study could impact somebody's septic tank on two different properties. Chair Tuchscher stated that the Planning Commission was looking at a long-term horizon for a future development, and making sure that proper plans were in place as that development proceeds to accommodate that development. Mr. Jamriska stated that with the addition of those areas into the Sphere, it did mot change any jurisdictional issues or any legislative representation. Residents of the County prior to this meeting would still be in the County. They would still be represented by the County and receiving their services from the same providers. The change of the Sphere line did not change any of that. Mr. Jamriska again stated that the Sphere was only a plannil1g tool that staff would ) be using in the future to provide urban level of services. Commissioner Tarantino stated it was an opportunity to look at, not an opportunity to make decisions, not an opportunity to affect immediate change. Mr. Jamriska concurred. Commissioner Fuller remarIced that the doc:uments from other agencies c:omm~ing on the draft environmental impact report would have to be responded to in the final draft. The City of San Diego, the County of San Diego, and the Deparanent of Fish and Wildlife and their concern for the multi-species conservation plannil1g area felt that San Diego was the lead agency, and if the City of Chula Vista included the Otay River Valley portion, things would not be the same if this fell within Cbula Vista's Sphere of Influence. Commissioner Puller concluded that those agencies involved in the planning of that program have been established and would continue to be the same. Mr. Jamriska agreed and stated that the draft MSCP program. a study done by professional staff, would be released for public review probably within the next two weeks. The City of Chula Vista, as well as the County of San Diego, had submitted to the MSCP planni"l staff the boundaries of their General Plan, whiCh is the Otay Ranch plan for the City, as well as the Otay Ranch plan for the County. The City is basically in agreement with the County. California Fish. and Game and Fish and Wildlife sûD took issue during the public hearings on the General Cj.. S'¿) ._---~.__._-_._._..-._----~_..- _..._._.._,~ _0.___-·, -.-.-....- - ------.---- PC Minutes -11- February 22, 1995 ~ Development Plan to certain items of Chula Vista's plan. Mr. Jamriska stated that in the correspondence received, they still take issue with the General Plan. Commissioner Fuller questioned whether they would take issue with it if it were in the County, also. Mr. Jamriska affirmed. Commissioner Willett stated he could see how the County had made some of their recommendations on the update study that was published. He had compared the draft EIR and the update study to fmd where some of the differences were and had also talked with staff. It is a planning tool. From the planning tool comes all of the logistic elements of a plan. He commended staff and the people who had worked on the draft EIR. He stated it was very thorough, covered some of the loop holes that were in the update stUdy, and he believed the fmal would correct it. He had done research thfough the LAFCO documents regarding the time period, and he believed with the fmal EIR the questions and fears regarding the Sphere of Influence would be corrected. Commissioner Willett disagreed as an individual with the San Bernardino meridian line dividing the lake in half which is on lane 6 of the Olympic Training Center. Regarding the Munson property which was in the County corridor, he had questioned who the landfill supponcd. Staff had stated that 85 % of that is the South County. A memorandum agreement could be worlœd out. Regarding the DeGraaf property, Commissioner \ Willett stated he had questioned where the light rail would come from, and it would probably go through that canyon as part of the DeGraaf property, and then tie into what would be the south side of Telegraph Canyon Road, which would be the rail line. He did not think that had ever been discussed. He offered as a recommendation that the Qtmmi~,ion adopt the study, the conceptional portions of the study itself, and that staff be directed to inco¡porate some of the items in the LAFCO stUdy. At Chair Tuchscher's suggestion, Commi~sioner Willett moved that the Commission give staff direction to prepare a final EIR on the Chula Vista Sphere of Influence, EIR-94-o3. Commissioner Ray seconded and asked for discussion relative to the San Diego City property on plannillg Area 4. Mr. Jamriska stated that the phrase 'closing the public hearing" should be included as part of the motion. Commi~sioner Willett concurred. Commissioner Ray, regarding plannil\g Area 4, the San Diego City property, asked staff to give him pros and cons if it were included in a special study area as opposed to approving it as part of planning Area 4. , Mr. Jamriska said that one of the advantages of recommending to Council that it be a special \ stUdy area was that it would permit staff to begin some boundary negotiations with the City of 9'5'1 __._.,._,.._.._____,,___._.._~'_~.__m_..._ ___'0"_ .....-.....-....----.--....- PC Minutes -12- February 22, 1995 San Diego not only on this parcel but several other parcels. If a resolution of those issues could ) occur to the satisfaction of both jurisdictions, then as a special designated area, staff could go back to LAFCO in the future without going through this lengthy process, and request that they take action if there is no opposition from the City of San Diego. Chair Tuchscher asked if staff was recommending that as a better avenue for the Planning Commission to take at this time. Commissioner Ray questioned including it in planning Area 4 without a recommendation that on the fmal EIR it be submitted as a special planning area, if at the time this would go to LAFCO it became a hotly disputed issue, they could deny or amend the Sphere of Influence study based on that specific parcel. Mr. Jamriska replied affIrmatively. He stated that in light of the City of San Diego City Council Land Use and Housing Committee's action, he thought that would probably be a very appropriate action for the Commission to recommend that LAFCO designate this as a special study area so that several of the boundary disputes could be resolved. Chair Tuchscber stated that it is likely that the City of ChuIa Vista could gei a special study area and resolve some of the other boundary disputes for the west, as well as for this particular issue, but there was not a high degree of confidence that the Sphere could be expanded-that LAFCO would look favorably on an expansion of Chula Vista's Sphere to include planning Area 4. In ) fact, Planning Area 4 was designated because that might be the case, and it was split off from the others for that purpose. Mr. Jamriska said that was correct. During the discussions of the GcDeral Development Plan hearings, there was one issue with the County of San Diego where the City of Chula Vista wanted Planning Area 3 to be industrial, and the County of San Diego wanted that to be residential. Those were the only two differences in ChuIa Vista's General Plan. Statements were made by the. City Council during that time that if the City of San Diego de-annexed this property and the City of ChuIa Vista annexed it, the City of ChuIa Vista would change their General Plan back to residential on this portion. Based upon that acûon and the discussion at the City Council, staff included the Otay Mesa industrial not as an alternative but as a planning Area 4 SO that in the likelihood of a negative recommendation from the City of San Diego, it would not jeopardize acûon on the other three plAnning areas. Commissioner Ray asked if the property owner, the City of San Diego, had indicated hesitance to inclusion in a special study area, as well, or had that specific issue been addressed. Mr. Jamriska stated that the plOperty owner is the Baldwin Company within the jurisdiction of the City of San Diego. He noted that when staff spoke before the subcommittee, City Manager Goss suggested that it be made as a special study area, The Council members in attentlAIV'-C did not respond to that and just took an action to recommend to their City Council that it not be deleted from their corporate limits. It was not discussed, but it was brought up. ) ?.. 5'2 - . ..- .-..------------..--.......-...-" _ --.~--~.~ -- ---,_.-... .. - ____.___n_______.___ PC Minutes -13- February 22, 1995 ( In response to Chair Tuchscher, Mr. Jamriska stated that the Baldwin Company had remained neutral. Chair Tuchscher asked, in light of that, did the motion stand or was there potential for making Planning Area 4 a special study area, . Commissioner Ray stated that he would like to see the motion amended to include only the bighlighted area wbich fell within the city limits of the City of San Diego. Chair Tuchscher asked if that was to be designated as a special study area. Commissioner Willett, as the maker of the initial motion, concurred with that recommendation. Commissioner Ray concurred. In addition, he stated that Mr. Jamriska had pointed out that it be included along with some other special study areas. Commissioner Ray asked if that would be a separate action that would have to happen here? Mr. Jamriska replied negatively, and noted there were other ploperties in boundary disputes. Chair Tuchscher asked for the vote. ¡ Environmental Review Coordinator Reid asked that before the plAnning Commi~sion took action on that, a final EIR needed to be before the Commission before making recommendations on the project itself and plAnning areas and their categories. Attorney Basil concurred with staff. Chair Tuchscher stated that the Commission should close the public bearing on the draft EIR. ask staff to prepare a fmal draft EIR, and then save the rest of the recommendations and discussion for March 14th. Commissioner Ray asked if in preparation of the final EIR, staff would include that as part of all the studies. Mr. Jamriska said staff would actually respond to Commission's discussion on the issue, and would focus the response on plAnning Area 4 City of San Diego, SO that would give the CommillSioners some additional facts and information. CommillSioner Ray asked what the dlifference was in the recxwnm""".IÎOD as it stands vice waiting for the final EIR. Mr. Jamriska stated that the purpose of the meeting was to receive public testimony on the draft environmental impact report, close the public hearing, and give staff direction to prepare the environmental impact report. 9~'>:7 ~'-'-'---_..~-_...-'----_.._- --....--.---.-- --.-., "_._~._._... ----"~---_.. PC Minutes -14- February 22, 1995 Chair Tuchscher stated that staff would take into account those comments and all the discussion from both public and from the Commission and respond to those in both the staff report and the final document. Mr. Jamriska said that when that report is presented to the Commission on March 14, that would be the proper time to make that motion, basically certifying the final environmental impact report and then taking action on the Sphere of Influence report itself. That would be where the Commission could modify the boundaries. Commissioner Ray concluded that this piece was to be included on the fmal EIR as it was currently presented, and then wait to make recommendation only at the point of the 'fmal EIR, after the public hearing is closed on the fmal EIR, rather than come forward with an EIR that states that the Planning Commission wanted that in a special study area. Chair Tuchscher clarified that staff would respond to the discussion by the plannil1g Commission in the staff report and in the fmal document. Commissioner Ray stated that staff would make a determination as to whether it would make sense to make it a special study area and come forward with that recommendation at that time. Mr. Jamriska answered affJ1'JDltively. ) Attorney Basil asked that the motion be restated. RESTATEMENT OF MOTION Motion that the PlAnnil1g Comml£d9n close the pubUc bearing, and direct IItafI" to prepare the final environmental impact report aDSWeI'ing all of the comments from both the public and the PlAnning Comml tdon. VOTE: 7.0 to approve ITEM 2: PUBUC HEARING: GPA-94-05: CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF A CHILD CARE ELEMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN Principal Planner Bazzel presented the staff report, noting that the Element was intended to provide a policy framework for adequate childcare facilities within the City. A public workshop bad been held in January where the Clilld Care Commk~ion and staff received comments. The Paries & Recreation Commission bad fully endorsed the Element. Staff recommended that the p anning Commission adopt the Negative Declaration and recommend to the City Council the adoption of the proposed Child Care Element. Mr. Bazzel noted that the planni11g Commission bad received a letter from Mr. Bruce Sloan of the EastLake Company, who was in attendance, and he stated also that members of the Child Care Commission who were actively involved in the preparation of the Element were present. 9'5';4 , -~-_.'.-""---'-----'--"'- --.-------- ___n... -.-........ --.---..- - -.-- -_._.._-~...,..- "..----- NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION of Chula Vista, Califomia, for the purpose of considering the following General Plan Amendments (GPAs): Ownership: From: To: GPA 95-01 Satterla Parcel San Diego County Low Density Residential Multiple Rural Use GPA 95-02 Lower Otay Reservoir Parcels San Diego County Open Space Multiple Rural Use GPA 95-03 Water Reservoir Low-Medium Residential Public/Quasi-Public Otay Water District Property Low-Medium Residential Public/Quasi-Public Otay Landfill Low-Medium Residential Public/Quasi-Public A Ptogram (Second Tier) Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) of possible significant environmental impacts has been prepared by the Environmental Review Coordinator for the GPAs and the Sphere of Influence Update Study (SOl). The SOl, PEIR and GPAs are on file in the Chula Vista Main Library and offices of the Planning Department and Clay Ranch Project. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council and/or the Planning Commission must be received in the Clay Ranch Project Office no later than noon of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the City's action on these GPAs or Sphere Study in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council and/or the Planning Commission at or prior to the public hearing. SAID JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION on Tuesday, March 14, 1995, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue. Any person deSiring to be heard may appear at the meeting. DATED: March 3,1995 CASE No.: GPA 95-01,95-02,95-03, EIR 94-03 IIb~inda\pubhear.doc 9-S-? - - - - - ..-..---~---.___.___,_____ .. ··_'__~__··_·_____·__·m__._' o··.·__.___..u _.......__.~__._..m'._'.~____ _ ._ ..____..._.__....__.______ 7,1 I u._ I .oþ \~1 ! -- , : ç ! ~ ( . , ~ jJ I , (( . t ~- I ~ -- -J:'.~ I - ---- 1- "'. -/¿ \ - --i- " " . ~ I I ~'ì:'\J/ \' ," . ~ --- - ;___L J " 1 \ · --~ i\ ~ -. \- I .. 1- )r I I ___ _____~________l____ \ ¥ ~ Ai \ · I ~ £ \£ ~ VOl R 1 ~ 1 0 \ t~ 0'" \. -1 \ '~ ! : . I L_ ___ : ¡ · I \ i 1 ~------- -- \ I , ,I \ I' I CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR APPLlCANT:City of Cbula Vista PROJECT DESCRIPTION: · ÇENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Œ) ADDRESS: North of lower Otay Relervolr Request: GPA for Low density (O-3du/ac) on 20 aues in San Diego County. SCALE: FILE NUMBER: NORTH - NONE GPA-95-01 9--:57 - -~~ o. (' - " - .~_. ~ ~ -, ,- . --., . ~';. }, -~. ;:¿-) - I -) ì, ì... ;:;... -.... C .'4 ..(~ , - - , , .. #; ~ r-) ¡ ) ) J : -.... e ot ~'\..- " " J ,,_,'-:J :-;« ,<], ,) ) I J -) I... e .t: -. {'\ . ',. .' . - . :; .; :)Ø'!.-~ "k"\..... ... ...-..~. ..... -'" _..... __,J< '_Þ ('0 t, ~ C . t t·" . ., _ i ~.:- :, :;'..... C.rZ ',..'- '- ) :; d ~) ~. . . . . . . "- ,,"- '-- ( o. ;). t: ~ . -'.c ..1 , .' -- - f -....nOU'i xxx)(x>< XXX)(jlt:ï L ~_~~~~~~-__~~_~ ~O"'-.J.c. >'>CX><)c.> )<)<)<>c-n-Þ <CXlOÞCXI xxxxxx xx >< X VH::tI ~ ~~ -<~ )c.)<xxxx )c)c::)c:)c..r z........ ... xxxxxx xxxx rr :Ice >CX)c)c)c)c' )()c)<>c:ë :r:m-O xxxxxx xx x x...... 0 ,",þ VI.... )c.X)c:')t)oCX x)(xxvC Þï c;!..... 0 XXXXxX xxxx C" rr»1>C )C')<)c:)()Cx >'x>cxc...... .0 r- xxxxxx XXxx....¡:o r'\.ÞI:=:> )<)<x)<)<)< )<'XXXÞ ~<2:V"I xxxxxx xx><x-< .....n.....v· xxx)<)<x )<.)<x)< " ... zo xxxxxx XXXXï" r xxxXX)e' )<X)<X]>Þ n- xxxxxx xxxx:::-::, CÞ x)<x)<)<)< )()c x >Crr-,..c ..... xx><xxx XXXXVlU'I rr xx)<)<.x)< )<)<x)< I VI xxxxxx xx X x:;JC 0 XX)C:)<)(X )c:: x)< xc:..... i r- xxxxxx xxxx- x><)()Cxx xxx x... -0 xxxxxx xxxx - )<)<)<x)<x )c)<)<)Crt XXX xxx xXxx xxxx)<x )<xx)(c:: xxxxxx X><><X"T1 ....."............""'..... 'V..... "..... e-.¡ V' X>C:)(XX)< )<xxxxx 3N .0 xXxxxx xxxxxx ""... ex xXX)t)tX )t)tX)t)<X oa ... xxxxxx xxxxxx c .. )<)<)<)<)<)< )c)<)c')t)c:)t Þ3 0 xxxxxx xXxxxx m 0 XXX)c:)<)< xxxxxx or- N xxX xxx xxxxxx "'e c X>C)I()C.X)c )<)<)<)<)<x c: 0 xXxxxx xxx xxx _~.m - ...... .cÞ )t)tX)c:)c)c )c)c:)<)c)t"x - -.¡ xxxxxx xxxxxx 0(:' ~-, C C c ::: C-"'" r-, , -":1 ~ () ...'" xx)<.)<.)<)< )C.)<xx)c:x <J>O xxxxxx xxxxxx .1 ..t'i>' ; "\~. a )<)<)<)<)<)< )<x)<)<)<)< Ot.. :)..::..: j , _: - ,,~ xxxxxx xxxxxx ..J .. J )<xxx)<)< x)<x)<)<x ( .~ ;-n.r::',· -,. ..- xxxxxx xxxxxx >cxxX)cX )<>CX>c)(X C Ot. ~....' , - - ~I xxx xxx xxXxxx , )c)C>C>Cxx X)o")cX)o.)C .~ ..1;.-' )I xxxxxx xxxxxx OU n..!.. (J )<)<»x)< )<)<.)<)<)<)< xXxxxx xxxxxx 1.,-",. ~ _.....,: ._' .__" __.' ,__ ~J-'~" xX)exxx XXX xxx -' ~-~ "--" '- xxxxxx xxxxxx I -. -, X)tX)t)t>c )c)tX)t)(X xxxxxx XXx xxx XX)()t>C)t x)<)<)<)<)< X)(XXXX xxxxxx - 9 -..!>7 - ~.~___.____. _..___.~~____. ~.._,_".~"._____._ n__..______________ ________._____._~_~_..___ .. ......--.--------.------- .- ~_...._.~--.._---_..."._----~_.- NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering the following General Plan Amendments (GPAs): Ownershio: From: To: GPA 95-01 Satterla Parcel San Diego County Low Density Residential Multiple Rural Use GPA 95-02 Lower Otay Reservoir Parcels San Diego County Open Space Multiple Rural Use GPA 95-03 Water Reservoir Low-Medium Residential Public/Quasi-Public Otay Water District Property Low-Medium Residential Public/Quasi-Public Otay Landfill Low-Medium Residential Public/Quasi-Public A Program (Second Tier) Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) of possible significant environmental impacts has been prepared by the Environmental Review Coordinator for the GPAs and the Sphere of Influence Update Study (SOl). The SOl, PEIR and GPAs are on file in the Chula Vista Main Library and offices of the Planning Department and Otay Ranch Project. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council and/or the Planning Commission must be received in the Otay Ranch Project Office no later than noon of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the City's action on these GPAs or Sphere Study in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council and/ot the Planning Commission at or prior to the public hearing. SAID JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION on Tuesday, March 14, 1995, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue. Any person desiring to be heard may appear at the meeting. DATED: March 3, 1995 CASE No.: GPA 95-01, 95-02, 95-03, EIR 94-03 IIb~ind.\¡)ubh..r,doc 9-5'; ·____·____~____·~·_"_m_._______..____.__._.. __.,...___ ___ ____.__...._ -_.._._------- .~----_.,..__._--~~.- ... I Clay Wilier DIstrIct Property 81.080. From: Low MedIum RNldenU81 ... Th: PuÞlc/Quui PWlIc I ... .. \ ~ , ',,- , · .. ... . . .. ... + . . . . . \ \ · Clay I.8ndIDI 250.59 80. From: 0p8n SpBce Th: PubIc / QwøI-PubIIc .. WaIIr~r . 18.59 80. From: Low MedkJ'n RBoidllnt181 + t·ooo",..,., To: Public I Quul-l'lmlc '~¡¡m¡1m . . .. .. .. LEGEND · W;f'k~IINDICATES PROJECT LOCATIONS ...... -.... ~-J. ~.~ ---- CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR ~, Otay Ranch PROÆCT DEllCRIPTICIIt C!) Public Properties GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT :¡ ~Ronch - Various non Request: General Plan Am8ndment · ' Bal 'n Co. owned parœls SCALE: ALE MAomEA: 9"¿' ZJ NORTH No Scale GPA . 95 . 03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - w u - - 0 > ..... '" 0 ..., w u =-0 ., '" ::rOO ... ~ ~ " 00 .. ... '" '" -.. ... '" '" ... '" .... Xu .,. .. 0'" 0 '" .... 0 ... - ., 000 .... '" "'" '" .. - .... ... '" 0 00 ww 00 u Z ... ... '" 00 -" .. ., u ->0 z .. 0.. .. '" "'... w 0 "'0" .. u z u 0 >.. ...u '" z.. .. ..." 0 ..~ 0", 0..... 0 . O"E . O~ .o~ 0 '" "U "w :> :>... :>" .. :>-" " .ow w- O~ "'O~"" "'0 ~ ..~" .o- X "''' z> ~.. 0 "'w 0 Ou.I-~u.I ....> ,,- 0.. .. O=-U ....0 0"'" 00_ - '" 0'" "'... ..... '" - ....J:a:¡O "'- ... UUO "'.. "'0 O~ .... 0..... Ou OZ.... 0.. ....... =- t"'I\ltOO=' "'..'" ,,".cOZ ~"'O ..,....ONZ ~'" ° ~""O:r ~~'" 4"cIOC ~O'" -r-.....04 ~XU ~ .ou.lU,,"u DO" .oct,o....., .ou.n""" .oYUNvt .oUZQ.Uo ------------------- '" ~ ~ '" '" .. 0 ..... .... .. ...0 - ,,-> ., XOO ... .. -> 00 - ... ° '" "'-.. ~ .... - .... " '" ;¡:U , 00 " 00 - W ... '" X , ... '" -0'" W...", .. 00 ~ 0..0- ....." '" U '" ° ",_z '" - Z",.. Z .."'- E 0 .. U .. t:......:Jt. .. Z "'z '" u.... ~ 0",,,, 0 - . 0 - . 0 E'" 0 0 OW" 01.1.1.1.0 0...... OZ- 0", 0 "'_.. ","~u.'" ~O... ..... '" "U '" "''' 0 "'w 0 '" o-w..... 0.. .... O"U O>-ac_ 0>-.::11I:_ "'z "'E '" '" - ...~ 0 "'~ 0 a::IOO4 "'''' '" 0>-'" 0..... 0"'" ....:Ja;)Þ- "'0 ... "'..'" 4'::IOZ ".::10% ".ct:""'Z 4'U....OClt: ~ ~~'" ..,.~t\, ... ".ON4 .,._C""I4 ~U'" .. ~ .oOU...._ .0O.. .oUIl"IV'I .oUII'II.I'\ 'O.....,....VI .oE::Io..V'I ., ~~~--~------ - -- - ~ '" '" ° ~ ::r ~ .... '" 0 ., .. 0 00 '" ~ .. ... . Z - .0 '" 0 '" ... E 0 Z 00 "'- ... " ... ~ "'" ... ... ~ 00 0 w.. 0 . , ::r0'" .. -.. .... ~ X .. ~"'.... - 0'''' '" '" '" U W '" Z 0 00 0 .. W "'~o- '" z z .. '" .. ,... ° .... .. .... .. w wO.. U "'- U "'- , ~.... "'U 0 0 '" 0 '" 0 00.... O..U 00 O...W ° O"'w 0,", "'.. 0<4:::11:0 "''' 'OOa......., t"'IOQ..... ...u > ",,"'OU "'w 0 o"'w 0 0'" 0" " ... ..'" 0- 0"'" - 0"'" "'E 0" "'''' ,''0 .......Q.UO ·.........Q,.UO Þ", Þ" ~j.oO 0 OZ 0.. ....0 - ....~... "'Z "'00 4'::1:)'""7- "":J~NZ ~U 0'" ..,."'"".....% orc>-........ ".0.....0 ....0.....0... ~U~ .. .r:;)t""IC .O"'....u....V .o<..H.)N"" -DUUNV'I .oa:V'lQ.V1 "'..,........, .. '" ° U .. '" .. .. - .. X 0 =- '" 0 '" '" - '" .... "'''' '" X ... w ...00 .. '" " 0 .. 0 .." 0' - '" .. .... ~... Z ... w 0 ° '" ...."'''' ...- '" '" '" .... '" 00 .. 00 .." 00 ... ... w ::>0 -.. -0 00 E" > "'0 "'E" "'~ .. 0 ... ..U W ... ~....u ~ ~U wwOac 0'" u 00 0"'. 0",.. Ovt~V'I O....ctI"'lO 0 ° 0 ow O:)Q.O 0::> ° 04"'1"'1 .0 0...." ...w ""O~ w "'0 " OQOJ:~ ...O=- ° '" ....ww "'''' 0 "'w 0 0%4W ....Z........w ...._4X% 0 .. - 0.. 00 - N_~_ "'- "'- N...J....J04 '" "''''0 "'.... NJ:Q)O '" '" 0 '" ""'0 CQCWCD..J 0 ... 0_ oU ......... ...>- "''''0 - '" OOOZ t"'IVlOO .....ZO% ..,.c....Z .,.ceCt"t% ~Z 0'" ~ ,...... .,.......0 .......oe .,.....,..,oC .,..........N4 .,...;,..11.... U .oOV.......... .OWUO'U .oac.oV'l .00...."'" 'OOu....V'I .oUOCL.Q. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -1~noO" ~... ><><><:><)<)0( f:~;: ~O'.....~.. .N.... )1(><>< >< >c>< <CIIOÞW ZNO X)(XXXX X)(ÞCI:I -- -< 0 )(X)(X)()( XXVI'" Z_.... 0 0: XXX><x>< XX_ m :I _....m )(X)()()()C xx.... :rm m"'~ XXXX)C>e fX"'o n. "..... xxxx)Cx )<><co .,..... 00"' ><xxxX)C XXI:J:I..... m. "'''' )(xxx)Cx XXrC7' <> n Z XX)(XXX rx-o N" ..~ )(X)(X)()( xxn ...< ~ ....~ )(X)(X)(X XX.... - -~ 00 .. )(X)()()()( Xx " . ZO "'.,... )()()(X)(X xx."." n -"'.... XXXX)()( XXXI.. n_ NO XXX)()()( >exO, 0.. _on X)(XXXX )(X~..o .... 0 XXXXx)( ~SS~ m X)(Xxx)o( ~ )(x><x)(x n X)()(X)(X fX- ,... 0 X)(XXXX xx", X)(XXXX xx~ ." x><xxxx xx xxxxxx xxz XX)()()(X XXO XXX>eXX ;s:><x~ X)(XX)(X Xx - .......v'V.....v ~)()(~ . ~...VI\1I OoðmUl -.-no\1l xxxxx>< XXX)( C-<Þ..o :[OÞ-D ~o-.........o X)(XXXX )o(xxx '" 2'''' CO"""" CCÞO:"VI xxxx)C)C X)(><)(' ,... '" ,... ....'" -- -<0 X)(XXXX xxxx ON Þrr", 2'_.... ... X)(X)()C')( x><X)( n _0 ".0 m :I<O xxxxxx )(XX)( m'" <Z7l:.... :rm_w )()c:XXXX xxxx "'" -tnm-o n.. ~'" X)(X)(XX XXXx 00 ~ 0 .""(1:1-10 X)(XX)(X )()(X)( 0 .....00 mþþO xxxxxx xX)(X n ..<", 00 ,... XXXXX)( XXXx 0 ",< NÞOþ xxxxxx xxxx C n m ...,¡<..V> X)(x)C'xx )(XXx Z ...,... ....m_v. )()(X)(XX xxxx _0 . ZO )()(X)(X)( xxxx <>0." n XXXXX)( XX)()( _03 n_ )()(X)()()( X)()(X <> m 0" X)(X)(XX xxxx - Z .... XXXXX)( X)(X'X . .... "' XXXX)(x xx><x ~ XXX)()(x x><xx n XXXX)(X XXXX '" r )()()()o;)()( )()("X)( .. XXX>CXX XXXX C ." xxxxxx xxxx .... xxxxxx xxxx :r XX)(XXX xxxx 0 XX)(xxx XXxx '" XXXXxx XXxx - )o(x)o(X)(X XXxx -.-..- "----- - ---~_.~~--- )(.-c;)()I( -....noO' t""hO...",,\.II XXXX)(X ~O'''''-f'''' IO-<Þ.o XXXXX)( )()()(X <œoÞw CO Z'" XXXX)(x XXXX -- -<0 ,... '" XXXxxx XXXX XXXX Z_.... - ..,... ON XXXX)(X XXX)( :I<O .. _0 X)(XXX)( xXxX :%m_o <z "'N xxxxxx .. "'''' -", COO xxxxxx xxxx ,...œ-40 ~ 00 XXXXXX XXXX XX)(X n'lÞÞO ...... 0 )(XXXxx XXXX .00 ,... ..< n XXXXXX "- 0.. m 0 xxxxxx xxxx ... O:~ n c: XXXXXX XXXX - -~ .- 2' )(XXXXX XXXX . zo - .... XXX XXX XXXX n 000 -< xxxxxx xxxx - _0 XXXXXX XXXX 00 0: XXXXXX XXxx - . XXXXXX XXXX "'" .... XXXXX)( XXXX m XXXXXX XXXX '" XX)o;XXX XXXX XXXXX')( XXXX .. XX)("XXX XX)("X c: >CXXXXX XXXX .... XXXXxx XXXX :I XXXXXX XX><x 0 ><XXXXX XXXX '" XX>CXXX XXXX - xxxxxx xxxx ·V'I.....ncO' VI....CO' ("'\....-Vl\1' XXXXXX IC..IC..IC..IC.. þ.................. .,,0........ IÞ-'VlE..o XXXXxX xxxx Z.oCÞW ~""'ÞW CW....n'I\ ! XXXXXX xxxx ... -<0 -..0-<0 r-O;lClmw XXXXXX XXXX 0"'''' N Z'" N .. -....'" X)()(XX~ XXxX - ..0:0 CO 0:0 'T1na::o XXXXX)< XXxx m".,....,.", ....0 <-~þ"" xxxxxx xxxx C')r-C-t\ll <.-4œ _"ft ....... XXXXX)( XXXX " ~~c Þ3n-C ~~ ~c )(XXX)()( xxxx n_:;oo ,......:;00 .....,. "'0 XX>CXX)( xxxx ("'JÞ7. ""n .. XXXXX)( XXXX .'" 0 "':IO ... c: XXXXX)( xxxx _tI"_ -<..- < 2 XX)()Ot)< )()(X)( .oZc::Vt . ~ n", - XX)(X)()( XXXX X)()(X 1'\.10_'" "'.... .. 0 X)(XXX)( XXXX ... ,...'" no," Z XXXXX)( W:IÞO_ ....- 0 xxxxxx xxxx ommn on 0 :I )(X)(XXX xx",", .."'.... 00 .... 0 - x)(XXXX xx",", ,...~ '" 0 '" XXXXXX xx",", 0 0 :I x)(XXXX xxxx - ... XX)(XX>C xxxx N .. ~ XXXXXX XXXX 0 n XX)(XXX XXXX 0 :I XXX)(X)( XX"" xx",", 0 xxxxxx xx"'"' 0 XXXXXX xxxx I} -¿,;2- ,... XXXXX)( xxxx XX)(XXX 0 0 XXXxxx xx"'"' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering the following General Plan Amendments (GPAs): OwnershiD: From: To: GPA 95-01 Satterla Parcel San Diego County Low Density Residential Multiple Rural Use GPA 95-02 Lower Otay Reservoir Parcels San Diego County Open Space Multiple Rural Use GPA 95-03 Water Reservoir Low-Medium Residential Public/Quasi-Public Otay Water District Property Low-Medium Residential Public/Quasi-Public Otay Landfill Low-Medium Residential Public/Quasi-Public A Program (Second Tier) Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) of possible significant environmental impacts has been prepared by the Environmental Review Coordinator for the GPAs and the Sphere of Influence Update Study (SOl). The SOl, PEIR and GPAs are on file in the Chula Vista Main Library and offices of the Planning Department and Otay Ranch Project. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council and/or the Planning Commission must be received in the Otay Ranch Project Office no later than noon of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the City's action on these GPAs or Sphere Study in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council and/or the Planning Commission at or prior to the public hearing. SAID JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION on Tuesday, March 14, 1995, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue. Any person desiring to be heard may appear at the meeting. DATED: March 3,1995 CASE No.: GPA 95-01, 95-02, 95-03, EIR 94-03 Ilb~ind.\pubheaLdoc 9/¿) - --~----_._+----_. ..-------..,-.---- -....,..- .----.--- ----.,...----.- ... _._..~."-_._.~-----~-- i . ---...-_-- --- - -- I I ! , , . f _ 1 ~£\£RVOIR I 0 . ~~ 0'" ~ l- I I I . : I , L i , , ~---~-- -- I : ¡ ! CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR APPLlCANT:City of Chula Vista PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GENERAL PLAN AMEN»MJ:NT C) ADDRESS: North orOta~ Rd. ud Request: GPA for open .pace on Lower Otay nolr 28.6 acres in San Diego County. SCALE: FILE NUMBER: tj-¿y' NORTH NONE GPA - 95 - 02 xx>txxx xxxxxx xxx)o(>(X XX)(XX)( xxxxxx X)(xX)(X )()IP(~)(X )(X)()(X)( xxxxxx xxxxxx X>(>(X>(>( x..o(XXXX - XXXXXX xxx xxx )o(X)o(X>(X >(>(x>Cx>( xxx xxX xxx xxx .<.<XX>()o( >(>(>(>(>(X xxxx><>< xxxxxx )()(>(>()(X >(X)()(>(.)( xxx xxx xxx xxx >()(>(XX>( )I()(X)(XX xxx)(,xx xxx xxx U )(X>(X>(X X >(.< >(x>( " xxxxxx xxxxxx ~ >()(>(>(.<>( ¡o(.<x>()()( '" XX)(XXX xxxxxx < X)(.)(>(>(X :>()(>()(X)( .J xxx xxx xxx xxx 0« >«<>«< ««<>( :>~g xxxxxx xxxxxx ."" X)(¡o(X>(¡o( )()()(XXX ::'_',!lJ: XXXXXX xxxxxx 0>:1: >(>(>()(.<x )(>(>(¡o(XX " ~~ XXx xxx xxXxXX 0>- ~- - )(>()()(>()( )(X)(XX)( ,....4~';o> xxx XXX xxx XXX .............oac: )a-:: ~~~.~ ~'""):'""; .~~~.f) >(X)(>()(>( >(>(>(X>(>( .0.=1;,)-1... J ~;..U. ue - )(>(>(>(><¡o( ><XX)()(X - XXXXXX xxx XXX .::; '_ ,:.: ;;..:¡.. J ..eß X)(XX'><¡o( )("<XXX)( ;J<: : ~ ,~ ;:,.'.J :)~ .: xxx XXX XXXXXx XX>(J(J()( )()()()()(X -=: '_ ,_ . ;.. ; ,'I . 0 -..J.' ).eo XXXXXX XXX)(XX .. )(J(>()(>(>( >(>()()()()( :~:/< '.~> ~.-):'.()- ~'... ,') OJ XXXXXX XXX XXX ...J >()()(X>(>( )(>()(>()(>( If·""'" , - r" " ~ : ~..() ,eo --" -. ~ ~ - XXXXXX xXXXXX ~ --.),-; ~~G "'):)0·:.J...) .)UO.) X>(>()(>(>( )(>(Jo(>()(X xxxxxx xxxxxx )()()(X)(X )(XXXXX = --" xxxxxx xxxXxX Jo('<X>(><Jo( )()(>()(>(X xxxxxx xxxxxx 0 «-<-<>(>( >()(x:<>()( '" xxxxxx xxxxxx ~ )(X)()(Jo(:>( Jo(>«X)()( < XX)C,XX)( xxxxxx ...J x>(xx<Jo( X)()(XXX "''''' xxxxxx xxxxxx o~., x>(x>(x>< X>(>(>(>(>( "'" xxxxxx xx><xxX o_w:¡: x,()(>(x)( >(XJ(:<XX "'>:1: xxx xxx xxxxxX '" ~~ >()(>(>()(X XX>(>(J()( ...>- ~~ xxxxxx xxxxxx co-toco> x.<)(x)()( X)(XXXX ;J'ol-.....D.JC xxxxxx xxx xxx Il"IOu...._ xxxxxx xxx xxx >(Jo(><><>(A: X)(¡o«><>( xxxxxx xxxxxx X>(>(>(X>( >(>«'><>(X xxx xxx xxxxxx )(x>(xxJo( XXXX)(X Xxx xxx xxxxxx >(>(>(>(>(>( >(>()(>«x ~ xxxxxX xxxxxx z )(>(x>«.>( >(x>(>(>(>( .. xxx xxx xxxxxx E >()o(J(X>(>( XX,>(>(;¡(X ~ xxxxxx xxxxxx '" ~ x)O()(>(xx >(XX>()(.>( "" " xxxxxx x><xxxX "'.. ~ >()()(>(>(X x>(>(>(x>( .u.. " xxx xxx xxxxxx _0 '" X>(XX)()( x>(>(>(xx " xxx xxx xxx xxx >- < >«>(><>(>< >(>(>(x>(>( Z~ ...> ;-:- - -,....,--~~--- ~ ne·') xxxxxx xxxxxx 0<'" XXX)()(>( )()(>(X)(x O'-"W " xxxxxx xxxx>(x N .....'" xX<xJo(X XJo(>(X)(>< O"'~V'H" n ;...., .. .' '.0 XXXxxX xxxxxx 00'" - ~ >(>()o(x>(x >(:<><.x>(x '" ~:..J=a . ' -. : ~ ,.) . .. .; tie ) xxxxxX xxx xxx ~>- U ; -. ... .~ ~: ) .0 >(>(>(x>(>( XxXX)()( X)~:;)_'4Z xxxxxx xxxxxx o,,_.....o-t ) ,-, -"·1"a. _~-..;- :Ieo )(Jo(xxxX X>(Xx>(X .n:..JU~V"I n .. e. , , .0 ...........1'\.... .....................1'\..... :J .el) 'Ie ) u..xxxx xxxxxx ;;:¡xxxx .<X)()(XX C ..- ~ .0 xxxx xxxxxx - -. ,!l>(>(>(>( >(x>()(>(.>( ;M. ~ xxxx xxxxxx .. '" ">(xxx xxXx>(x ·xxxx xxxxxx ...J ",::::::a Jo(X)(.>( )(X)(X)(.>( OCK:XXXX xxxxxx ~ I )(XX)( X)()()()()( UJ Il\V'lXXXX xxxxxx ~ "cJ.I)(>()(>( x>(X)(>(x "" I~)(XXX xxxxxx _u 04:o4:>(X)()( )()(x>(xx u u a.....Jxxxx xxxxxx oz ... 0 " )(XX)( x>(xx)(>( .I'I_..u.... "'- >'xxxx xxxxxx V'I~>r-- ~:a -tX)()(>( >()(XXXX c(;:)<[:'\,I "" ....~xxxx xxxxxx ...J '" ...J '" ~.,:;»)()(>(>( >(xx>(>Cx O<CI:CCU OOC4.,U oD xxx x XXXXX)( O~~..J-t OI-a)...J O,....,,()(XX )(XX)(X)( ...'" <OU "'''' " O....xxxx xxxxxx O_WJ: o_w~ Z>(>()(>( >(x>()(>()( :>>>J: .. "'~:I: xxXx xxxxxx '" ~~z N ~~ .J0o>()(>(X X>(X)()()( ...~ ...~ "'~ ..~ .:ca..xxxx Xxxxxx CO-tOcXI> r---tOcXI> <[:.I'IX>(.-()( )(>(>(>«1( :1'1-.....D)C .:T.........OJC ..JOX'OO( xxxxxx r.t'Iou....._ ..oou...._ ( I f , , , I I 9't3 I --_..~. "--------.--.'" --~---_._-_._----------~--- ----..--.-.--.--- --. · I t)'tf ~~-' ,--1'" --- --- ~ ~~~ =--~~ :.-...;~~....... ~.............~ --- ON OF CHULA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TELEFAX COVER LETIER Te1ecopier No. (619) 585-5612 DATE: 3./ I I q5. - TO: Star News Le2a1 LI~¢.... FAX NO: (619) 426-6346 FROM: c..:e;, ( o. . ~ 9J-~ \ SUBJEcr:ß~~ · '. \\.. . ..r....~ (\ ~ \..:-,... \ TOTAL NO. PAGES (including cover): 2- PUBUCATION DATE: ~/ '-+ Io¡ s ( ~ - Jr ') If all pages are not received, please call Lorna @ (619)691-5041. 9/t g/ 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5041 ~- ~-..- .._-~----_._--- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Jd Meeting Date OJ/14/95 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit PCC-95-16; request to construct an unmanned cellular communications facility on the site of the Otay Water District water tank, located at the easterly terminus of Gotham Street - AirTouch Cellular (Continued) Resolution granting Conditional Use Permit PCC-95-16 to AirTouch Cellular to construct an unmanned cellular communications facility at the easterly terminus of Gotham Street SUBMITTED BY: DIT"'''' of PI"""', ß~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager.Jeq \:J.vð .....-J (4/5ths Vote: Yes-.NoX) This item was continued by Council from the meeting of January 24, 1995 to allow AirTouch Cellular time to address several issues of concern to Council. AirTouch, in a letter dated March I, 1995 (attached), is now requesting an indefinite continuance to allow them the necessary time to research and compile the needed infOrmation. The area residents who spoke at the previous hearing have been notified of the continuance. The item will be re-noticed when it is again scheduled for Council consideration. Staff has informed AirTouch that if they wish to make the Council meeting of April 11, 1995, they must submit the information by March 20, 1995, as opposed to the March 27, 1995 date mentioned in their letter, in order to allow staff time to analyze the data, prepare the staff report to Council and notice the area residents. RECOMMENDATION: That Council continue the public hearing indefinitely. M:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\AIRTOUCH\DELA Y A.113 1¿7-! __ ____nO ______._.___,_,_ _______.._........_____..__....______..___.____m ._~.__..._-_._-_._-_..__._.- ----------- --'.-----' '-' .--,..._--- 03/01/95 16:38 'ð'619 560 8157 SB&O @002/002 - SB & 0 March 1, 1995 Job No. 50930.00 MartiII Miller CITY OF CHULA VISTA Planning 276 Fourth Avenue Design Chula Vista, California 91910 Consultation RE: AirTouch Eastlake Communications Site PCC 95-16 Dear MartiII: Once again we must request a continuance of our City Council Hearing date, which . was scheduled most recently for March 14, 1995. There has been' some uncertainty over the number of items originally scheduled for that date, and because of the interest by the neighbors, we want to make sure that we will have adequate time to present the infonnation requested of us without the . pressure of a full and Contentious docket, In addition, we are attempting to be thorough in our informa1;ion, and that is taking longer than anticipated. You have advised that under the circumstances, we should ask for an indefinite continuance and have you renøtice the hearing once all the proper infonnation is I transmitted to you. That is fine with us; however, it would be our hope to get the information to you no later than March 27, 1995, which would allow us to be scheduled for the Apri111, 1995 docket (April 4, 1995 being an early afternoon hearing, which Council felt was not appropriate for an item with neighborhood interest). Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, SB&O, INC. /þ1~~ Susan . Lay Planning Manager ¡ SKL:abh cc: Kevin McGee/ Airtouch. Cellular W:\CJVlL\AJRTOUCH\LTRS\50513000B.ABH S B & 0, INC. LAND PLANNING· CIVIL ENGINEERING· LAi"D SLRVEn¡';G J tJ _ .:J.... 8615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201· San Diego, CalilOnìia' 92123. (619) 560-1141' Fax (619) 560-8157 ~~~----'------- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT II Item Meeting Date 3/14/95 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of Rate Increase for Collection and Disposal of Refuse RESOLUTION 17Y;.i Approving Rate Schedules for Collection and Disposal of Refuse Effective 3/1/95 SUBMITTED BY: Deputy city Manager Krempl Principal Management Assistant snYde~ 'Iv )~ REVIEWED BY: City Managerb ff (4/5ths Vote: Yes_ NO-.JL) This is an addendum to the council report from the 2/28/95 meeting on this same subject. A temporary rate increase is being requested by Laidlaw Waste Systems to recover increased landfill disposal costs paid to the County from October 1994 through January 1995. This issue was first considered at a public hearing on 2/28/95 and continued until 3/7/95 pending additional information from the city Attorney regarding the impact of the recommended action upon the City's current legal action against the County to, among other things, seek reimbursement for differential rates paid during that period. The issue was continued to this meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving the rate schedules to be effective 3/1/95. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: This report transmits the request from Laidlaw to recover the increased landfill charges through a temporary increase to customers over the next four months of Laidlaw's billings. (Attachment A.) Additionally, council requested review of proposed language for a billing insert which would explain a temporary increase to Chula vista residents and businesses should it be approved. The draft letter included as Attachment B would be sent out on Laidlaw letterhead and has been reviewed by City staff and Special Counsel. Alternatives The staff recommendation is to approve the temporary increase as first proposed at the 2/28/95 hearing. However, the following alternatives have been discussed by City staff and Laidlaw over the past few days. They are presented to assist Council in fully considering the City's options. 1/- J ______.._",.~_..,_,..,___.._.,._.._ ."··_____,___U,_"_"..__.._~ .___. "___ ___________._.__.._ ______ --- --.........-,.-,-,--.-.-. Page 2, Item ,II Meeting Date 3/14/95 1. ReDavment over six months instead of four months. includinq interest at 6.3%. PROS: 0 Would mean monthly increase slightly less than currently proposed. o Laidlaw agrees but conditions are to include interest and recoupment period not to exceed six months beginning with March. CONS: 0 Total repayment would be higher cost to the customer for only slightly lower monthly increases. o Rates would be adjusted again Sept. 1, 1995 when the repayment would be completed. 2. Delav recovery until Julv 1995 billinq when other rate issues will be considered. PROS: 0 Would keep rate stable until a number of rate components can be reviewed at the same time. o If the County lowers the tip fee on July 1st to $50¡ton, the increase could be less than the current proposal depending on the changes made to the other rate components. CONS: 0 Laidlaw does not aqree to this schedule as they have incurred the costs and desire reimbursement at this time. o Depending on the changes made to the other rate components, this action could result in a relatively large increase impacting the ratepayer all at one time. 3. Delav recovery until reimbursement issue is determined bv litiqation. PROS: 0 Delays possible impact on the ratepayer indefinitely. CONS: 0 Laidlaw does not aqree to this action as they have incurred the costs and desire reimbursement at this time. The city Attorney will also address any remaining legal questions or issues as appropriate at the meeting. J 1-.2 ______._.__._m._____._..__._ .·.·...._._"_.___.,._,_____"_n.~.._. ____....__._._ __._._ _ _.___~___..__ Page 3, Item II Meeting Date 3/14/95 FISCAL IMPACT: For single family residential, the rate for refuse collection is proposed to increase from $17. 27/month to $19. 85/month for four months, representing a temporary overall increase of 14.9 percent. The impact on all ratepayers is indicated in the rate schedules attached to the 2/28/95 Council Agenda statement and resolution. It is proposed that the City's franchise fee remain unchanged at this time. In addition, consistent with Council's action last July, this recommended action will be "revenue neutral" with respect to the City's total franchise fee collection. l/~ J ---.-..------,.-..----. ----.----" ,---,-". .____ _ _ ___ __..__ _"'__m'~ __0..' ._.._____ .-....-...,._,--~-- Attachment A MAR 6 1995 - øø"Søøø LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS INC. March 6, 1995 City of Chula Vista Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Mr. Boogaard: I write as a follow-up to the City Council's meeting of February 28, 1995, Agenda Item 14 ·Public Heating - Consideration of Rate Increase For Collection and Disposal of Refuse. . As you know, this represents a reimbursement to Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc for expenditures already incurred as a result of the October '94 .. January '95 Landfill Increase by the County of San Diego. The landfill expenditures to Laidlaw Waste, Systems are in excess of $600,000 for the period. As reflected in my letter of January 18, 1995 to the City of Chula Vista, we can no longer afford the financial burden associated with delaying reimbursement of this expense. Laidlaw Waste Systems fully supports the City of Chula Vista's position as they challenge the County of San Diego's right to apply an additional per ton charge to non-member cities. Laidlaw Waste Systems, however, cannot afford to continue to shoulder the expense incurred for the City of Chula Vista pending a final legal decision. The expenditures have already been acknowledged by the City of Chula Vista that it's franchise contractor has paid the applicable disposal rate for the period. At the same time the City of Chula Vista has also gone on legal record, well in advance of its implementation, clearly protesting and questioning the legality of the County of San Diego's practice. The reimbursement of Laidlaw Waste Systems, the franchise contractor, would seem to strengthen the City ot Chula Vista's position as the County of San Diego's action would then have directly impacted the ratepayers. The City of Chula Vista's position is clearly a matter of legal record. This action reimburses Laidlaw Waste Systems for expenditures incurred. 8364 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD.. SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92111 (619) 27&-6061 FAX (619) 278-7528 <Ð //- 'I - ~~--"_._----~_. -~--_.- --.---.--- -- -<--- ~---- ~ ~ ~---- - ....-- Both residential and commercial customers in the City of Chula Vista are aware of the pending adjustment as a result of: · News publication quotes from City Staff. · Customer conversations with Laidlaw Waste Systems' Customer Service & Sales Representatives. · General news releases regarding the County of San Diego landfill issues. * November/December billing insert letter from Laidlaw Waste Systems. To follow-up, a draft Question/Answer format communication regarding the landfill adjustments has been attached for your consideration. Should City Staff and City Council approve, the letter could be included with March billing statements along the following time frame: · Council Approval - March 7 · Letter Printing - March 8/9 · Overnight courier to mailing house - March 9 · Letter inserted/mailing begins - March 10 · This would not cause any additional delay in billing, Your timely consideration and support is appreciated as the expenditures carried by Laidlaw Waste Sys~ems since October 1, 1994 have seriously impacted our business operations. ÇifJ"W~ Ji Weaver Market Area General Manager Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. JW /mc cc: George Krempl, Deputy City Manager //'5 ~-------~,--- ---"--'-'---'~----~~'-"--'--- ---_._-_._,~-_..._,_._--,.._.__._.~~-_.._"--_._. .~_..- Attachment B Para obtener esta informacion D~~' Ai~-~T en espanol favor de /lamar al . .... '"m' .""> L;~" . , ì\!" (i' ,!J';. iI:¡ . telefono 421-9400. .. ~ ""..,,"~..·.<;,~r . . ...~ :'$;:- ~'f-';'~, ~ ~ "J ,~~,~ ,_,I II o;"! " :¡,ï~ 8j¡ :¡~ ... -.(. March 15, 1995 To Our Chula Vista Customers: The City of Chula Vista remains seriously concerned about the trash disposal rates charged by San Diego County. The County owns the landfills where your trash is now taken. The temporary rate adjustment reflected on your bill provides only for reimbursement to Laidlaw Waste Systems for disposal costs already paid to the County for the period of October 1, 1994 through January 31, 1995. During that period, the County increased disposal rates from $55/ton to $74/ton for Chula Vista residents and businesses. Although the County reduced rates to $55/ton on February 1, 1995, the City of Chula Vista is pursuing reimbursement from the County for the four months of higher costs. These address some questions you may have about your bill: Q. My bilI is different... what changed? AI. Residential: This bill includes an additional $2.58 per month that pays for increased landfill charges by the County which were paid by Laidlaw. A2. Commercial: This bill includes an adjustment of approximately 85 cents per yard for increased landfill charges by the County which have been paid by Laidlaw. Q. How long will the temporary increase be in effect? A. The landfill increase will only be included for the March/April and May/June bills. Q. What will happen to my bill in July? A. This temporary increase will be eliminated. However, there are other parts that make up your bill such as cost of service and trash diversion programs like recycling and yard waste. Some of those will be reviewed for changes in July and we don't know at this time what your total bill will be then. Q. What is the City doing about finding other disposal options? A. The City is very concerned about future disposal rates and is aggressively evaluating alternatives to provide the lowest rate possible and create long-range stability. We regret the County's actions and the impact it has made on your bill. You have our commitment to a secure, long-range solution for future rate stability. LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. 421-9400 I/~ t .~--,---- - ---." .-.-------.- _..._---~~-_.~--- -----.---".-'..--,..-- COUNCIL A.'''''A .......... 1<_ ç---- Meeting Date 2 2 5 ~ TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of Rate Increase for Collection and Disposal of Refuse RESOLUTION .178',,/ Approving Rate Schedules for Collection ~nd Disposal of Refuse Effective 3/1/95 SUBMITTED BY: Deputy City,.M~nager Krempl A ~ Principal Man~~ement Assistant snyde~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~{'.6[, (4/stbs Vote: Yes_ NO_1LJ On 10/1/94, the County of gan Diego and the Solid Waste Authority approved an increase in la dfill tip fees from $55/ton to $74/ton for all cities refusing to ,'oin the Authority. Chula Vista was one of ten cities ultimately charged the differential fee which also became the subject of litigation against the County and Authority. As reported to Council, this differential fee was subsequently eliminated on 2/1/95 when a tip fee of $55 for all system users went into effect. " Although Laidlaw paid thei higher disposal costs (based on the $74/ton charge) for the four months, the increase has not yet been passed on to ratepayers. In accordance with Section 8.23.090 of the Chula vista Municipal Code, Laidlaw has requested a rate increase in the landfill component to be spread over the next four months in order to recover¡the additional disposal costs paid out from 10/1/94 through 1/31/95. The proposed rate schedules do not include any changes in operational costs due tq a CPI increase, the franchise fee component or the recycling programs. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving the rate schedules to be effective 3/1/95. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: This public hearing was f~rst noticed and opened on 1/10/95. It was continued until 2/7/9$ pending information on possible rate changes in the tip fee which eventually did occur. On 2/7/95, the hearing was continued again to this meeting date. The primary reason was to be able to factor in results of a settlement conference in Federal Court scheduled for 2/22/95, at which one of the issues under consideration is the reimbursement of the four months of differential fees. There has been no definitive action on this issue at this time. ,J-Y' /fi,-/ ~ ~'- I L-1 -- _ .__.._... . .___ m__._......,.___..... .._.. Page 2, Item Meeting Date It is also noted that, at a joint meeting of the county and the Authority on 2/15/95, the County publicly acknowledged that there are no funds budgeted in the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund to reimburse the differential tip fee to the residents and businesses which paid it over the four months. Consequently, this report and its recommendations outline the "worst case scenario" in which Chula vista ratepayers must be assessed for the increased disposal costs of that period. If, and when, legal action provides reimbursement in the future, this adjustment will be rebated to ratepayers. Rate Structure For background, Council approved a methodology in August 1991 for the calculation of refuse collection and disposal rates. with that change, the rate is made up of several components: o Landfill disDosal fee Paid to landfill operator for disposal; amount set by operator. : o Franchise fee Remitted to the city to offset public costs of · maintaining streets, etc.; amount set by city Council. o other costs Laidlaw's cost of service, capital investments, etc. The Waste Management Franchise in the Municipal Code allows a pass through of landfill disposal fees as long as the proportion of change requested in that comDonent does not exceed the proportion of change in tip fees at the landfill. The proportion of change charged by the county during those four months was an increase of 34.5 percent of the landfill component. The landfill component accounts for almost half of the entire monthly residential bill. The landfill component is the only part of the rate which is · addressed by this request and report. The franchise fee and "other costs" components will remain unchanged at this time if the recommended action is approved. Attachment A presents the proposed residential and commercial rate schedules based on the 34.5 percent increase in the landfill component. The schedules show the increase to be effective 3/1/95 but covering the period from 10/1/94 through 1/31/95. It is proposed to collect the four month retroactive cost only over the four months of future billing from 3/1/95 through 6/30/95. · ~,It'-,):' - )\- ~ Page 3, Item Meeting Date The additional cost will described on the trash bill as a temporary charge. The monthly impa~t on rates for commonly used services is illustrated below: turrent- as Proposed- from Mo. Tvpe of Service of 2/28/95 3/1/95 - 6/30/95 Chq. Residential (Single fam.) $17.27* $19.85* $2.58 Senior "Yellow Bag" Pqm. $10.87* $12.00* $1.13 (Avg. 1 month cost) Commercial (Small business) $80.36 $91.35 $10.99 (One container/once wkly) * Includes charges for curbside recycling and yard waste which are not recommended to change as a result of this action: residential at $2.20 and senior program at $1.81 per month. , Future Rate Adiustments The only rate increase being recommended at this time is the pass- through cost of the landfill component. Other rate issues such as a CPI increase on the "other costs" component are being discussed with Laidlaw and reviewed at the staff level and will be the subject of a future report when the appropriate justification is available. (As background information, there has been no CPI increase given on the "other costs" component since 1992.) Independent of discussions on the CPI increase, new rates showing the removal of this four month charge and an annual review and adjustment of yard waste and curbside recycling rates can be expected for the 7/1/95 billing cycle. Additionally, the County and Authority have set a goal to reduce the tip fee from $55 to $50 effective 7/1/95 which would trigger another review of the landfill component on the bill. It is also prudent to remember that the relative instability of the County rate structure could result in the need to change disposal sites in the near future. This action would also necessitate revisiting rate adjustments. FISCAL IMPACT: For single family residential, the rate for refuse collection is proposed to increase from $17.27 per month to $19.85 per month for four months, representing a temporary overall 14.9 percent increase. The impact on all rate payers is indicated in Attachment A. JY-T--'V q "___n.'.__ "___.__..__ __.._~_ Page 4, Meeting It is proposed that the city's franchise fee remain unchanged at this time. In addition, consistent with council's action last July, this recommended action will be "revenue neutral" with regard to the city's total franchise fee collection. Laidlaw's higher gross receipts (needed to offset the higher tip fee expenses) will not result in additional franchise fees to be paid to the city. Total franchise fees for FY 1994-95 are currently estimated at $820,090. The franchise fee issue will be revisited with council later on when the CPI request is addressed. . . · · - · ~/I" -1- \ \ - U' RESOLUTION NO. 17Y':¿ 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING RATE SCHEDULES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE EFFECTIVE 3/1/95 WHEREAS, the County of San Diego and the Solid Waste Authority approved an incr~ase in landfill tip fees from $55 per ton to $74 per ton for all bities refusing to joint the Authority; and WHEREAS, in accor¢lance with section 8.23.090 of the Chula vista Municipal Code, Laidlaw has requested a rate increase in the landfill component to be spread over the next four months in order to recover the additional. disposal costs paid out from 10/1/94 through 1/31/95; and I WHEREAS, the proposed rate schedules do not include any changes in the operational costs due to the CPI increase, the franchise fee component or the curbside recycling charge; and city .. WHEREAS, the Council held a public hearing on February 28, 1995 to consi4er the approval of the rate schedules. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the ci ty of Chula vista dves ~ereby approve the rate schedules for collection and disposal of refuse effective 3/1/95 set forth in Attachment A, incorporated 'herein by reference as if set forth in full. Presented by J orn::i} George Krempl, Deputy City rd, City city Manager C:\rs\tra,hrate.1nc ~ ,.../,,->- 1\- \1 _...... ..______ _n__..___ ....--.....-...- ----."--_._~-,_._._----,... Attachment A øøJTSøøø LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS INC. February 14, 1995 George Krempl ~ePhanie Snyder Deputy City Manager Principal Management Assistant City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 92010 Enclosed are the proposed Commercial and Residential Rate Schedules. The Rate Components are adjusted as follows: Landfill Component .' Commercial and Residential Rate Schedules reflect the 34.5% increase in tipping fees instituted by the County of San Diego at Otay Landfill effective October 1, 1994 through January 31, 1995 ($55/ton to $74/ton). Although the Landfill costs increased on October 1, the rate adjustment has been delayed pending other developments. The proposal is to now raise rates from March 1, 1995 through June 30, 1995 to recover the additional landfill fees. Franchise Fee Component Based on previous actions by the City Council, no adjustment to the Franchise Fee Component is proposed. After your review of the proposed rates, please let me know if additional information is needed. r \. - - niel P, HigginS~ Market Area Controller Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. cc: Jim Weaver 8364 CLAIREMONTMESA BLVD., SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 9211' (6191278-6061 FAX (6191 278·7528 (j) ~.I.¡) , t - 11- \~ FEB-23-1995 12:62 LAIDI...F¥.J IoASTE SD p.e2 f· 'lli-I!fl 1111:: rl::!1 l!r" ~ ~.~ r;; ·f,·; i Ii Ii ï i : Ii i =J i : . I :11Il" ; i '.' ~ :'.:~ - I ~ I """'''' ocø (10'" [01010 III~Qcø~ ION ~cø I~N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . i Ii '~rJ ~ ~ I ~ e I ~ : ¡ ! :: ~ ;ri:ti:i :i ii ¡¡!! IØ ~~ ~ · · ~ · r~~· =! ~ ~. en !,:!!! !! 1D!2 ===1 .. t ..~...... ...:. ... - 'f:: I '.~, ';!i ÞjJ -. ca - .. In.. .. .. .. I '. . J_. '..-. õ ... .. .. .. .. .. .~ (10 (l)w 4i' a å i .; i' i Ii Ii i .; It, (l)W ' >- >.... -. -< cta: Jg ~ ~ .., [!ITI f-[TI'. .=!. -lTI~ =! I~":I ,. r"':\-ii~ ~ Ow Z .. .. ~ ~ :: ~ :: ill:':I ~ ~ : ~ww ' O~C ~. . __ ' 'I.' LU >"'(1) . . ' ' ...cw Õ ~ a: .~ _ ..... to- ._~. .0 ....... '< eO! =_"!IiI,,,:"~ ~ "!--: ~"!"= a: å~ ~.,.:;å:il : ,is to:! ~ --- ~ , '. r , ~ ~ . - - g ¡! B . . " . .... , ... I' . ., . .. .. ".. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. N .. . . _. . .. . . C\I ",. - .. -' ~ . . . . :s II; I~ II!: ~. i i :& : i ~ = .J ····r] ~' N 0 ØI .... .... '''''' - N .... - '" - cø~o~ ~'ltœ ~ o....~ . . ~ a:Þ ...... ~ . . ~5 - aØ ·1 _ C!O '''",' 'It 'It ". CD N¡ _ _ ~ ~ ,::::' ;11", ~ _ N ~'It * "'¡C' ~ *. ::-c 1* * I ' , ~~ . ~. II! I - ta· :¡ I~..i !;ê.¡ :; I ,.... .. :".'.... U '.,,, ! I.. :;g;t";¡i II I. I! I ~ Ii.. .... : ~ VI I :: :\ ! I If ,..i.. IE . ~ iFIE :,.E~I : ~ ' I IE" . ':. 0 F Oil 1:1 ó ~ . 2 5~ ~ iÐ:""lIIiE t _ ~ ~... t :u,~25..>= ,~ -'JJ r , 11- (~ ... _..·M_......·. '._.__.___ ... .u__._...._ II11I I I\IIIIII! I I I I 1IIIIIilllllll'l\I!I: \In I ~ ~ I I \ I II I I I I I II I I ~ I ~ II i Ai ~: ~ g ,§ ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ :~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ ~ I, I'" ~ i ~ 1 ' ¡ I !T¡:¡-;-¡¡ .\N N N:N NIM N N N N N N N _ _ .'. .,- - - - - _i_I_,_~ ~ I , -, , I 111 , I~ J · I~ ~ . . :~l~,. .¡w W N N _ _ ~ ~ . . .;0:. . W W NINI_I_i ~ fi Ii i Ii Ii Ii i \i,¡ I¡ II II 91191 !! !! ¡ I¡ Ila 10 10 . .191191 I;: I;: IIUJ i,g~gQQg~~DI~IQQli-\'~-\¡ i~lg~QQggQI'IYQgP.OO\\~~~~1 en ICD,'" '",:-....I,:r'\)¡:.lfþl.l\) C»~:o' ...,¡ ..... ".. II ... "') :¡¡;:\\CD 011\)1 cø 110') Nllcø, ( 'II.... CD œ II m ~ :j .... Ø) .... .,,0 '.....,C» ...,¡ .... 0 .... Ø) 0 ...,. CD CD C1t ,CD at U'I CD (,) ....,¡ cø CD 0,.... 0 '1Ø)Io..... . \1~1~I, I'. II. I,' II. II. I. II' II~. ., . I· II. I,' \. II· II. II' II' I,· '" I,· ".. ,. .... m 3: _ en W C 'co. WIIO". "" i~1 C . II!!!' W -.I,. . IØ . W en CO',~llen co ° w, .. 'co'~ wi£!:~'~~I~~~~w COc!!J ~~~~~~~~~~~8~cn ~i I 1 ¡I: , " , I~ J Ii iJ 151,5 iø I' 'J ~ ; i ~ . n ~ I~ J . \r¡ i; ~ ~ i "11= 1.1 ~ I~i ,~ I & ~ I~:II~ II~ I I ~ 8 ; 91 I ~ I I'~ !! ~ Ii: ~.. :, ~ ¡ 1 I I I' I I ! I I I I I ! 8 > I~,~ !t:11: ,! ,! "" !! ,!!!! !! 1t 1t 1iI11iI!! ,!! !! !! ,!! ,!! tI 'tll.,. :1: 't:' I'~ ~ [I: Z ~ ,$ :11111:. I. i: II ! I! !::I !::I µ µ, 1iI,1iI1!!! 1,1 !::I.!::I p; p; ,µµ ,~,~ ~ ,~~ .:!i==,t:t,~'~ ~i~ . . I I !'! ~ ~ .'~I'" ~ ~'I'I:r,r, IH :i~ ~ I : ! _ i ! I I _' I ~ ,I ~ ~ ;c :t :1: It: ',I: I: iii " JI" '!! !! I!!: " 'JIiI ,iii I.!! I! !!:!! !!! !! , :'! i~ S '.... ~ ~ I... 'III!:! : I I ¡:i ,I 1Ii'~'~: I II ,QI~ II ,I/ II';' , ' 'i;I ¡¡¡CO ,m I' I, I' " " !.' , i' " , I' IJ I~ I~' I' ':'1' $ I' " I' :! I' '! t~ I'" "" " 0'" m 0 II!:! ,I.lil I ~b1 8,11I11I I II ¡¡ ~ ," !:! ,!I ,N ¡ ::1,1 ¡s ,!I ,. ,~ I"''' ~, L-.L.J." Ö -I - ~'3: ~ ~ ~~rO ,ö m m "T1 'Z:rJ m I IT' "'O"T1° I I l:::a_ ..,.. I I I, I I I I ~ 6 I~ Ii ~ ;r I " \ I I ! ~ ,., C, !! !! ,! !,!!:!! II I . . 1! 1! iii iii t! t! . I. . . '1! 1! 11111 ,,11iI ,!! ',!!' ~ ~ ,IŠ i;I", :rJ :::! > . ~,~ ~ .I.'~ ~ J'J µ µ ~ ~ _ _ ~'J ~ J µIµ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ip!p · , ~> < I!! !!1~111111!111S11S II! ! BIIIS!IS 11\.11.1. !l1!lIB' IR¡; 'ö rri ~ Cñ ,z C/) C.:I -I 'm I > ,." ." ... 1m I 1!:1 to 1< tn 'm ~ J i J J \. I. !I J _ ¡ ¡ ~ . 11 ~ ~ In ; ¡ ~ J ~ i ,,\. \. \ ~ I~ ~ ~ I & ~ iii !III~ Ii ~ I I ~ 8 ;: Ii I ;t Ii I ~ !! ~ Ii: I .1: 1 liE, '. , I.... \ ! ,\ I~ 10 111111 i~ J II ~ ~ J J 11111 , ~ ~ ~ i i J J J \J I ~! '8 § I IS !I I K Kit I I I M M I I !! !! I I ¡; MM' . I I ~:~ ~~, æL l ~' ~ ! I Iq 1 I iii ! J !! ~ ~ . t 11" " ~ !! !! !! !! !! · · . Ë 1! ~ § I~ ~ p:I!::I,. I,. . II ~,. II . II pi . $ II !II ,. 1'1 Jiò µ:;¡ ~ ....' . I. I ! . I I I I II ¡¡ ~ ;: !:! ! = ¡ ::1 . & ! ¡ ~ t! 0, ~'~i~Q~iM~II..!I'~iiii'! I~i~\~\\'ii~n~~n~~ '¡' ~ ~ ! ... ...., i...., I~ uil1¡;1\ ... .. '" '" ~1 f\) .. ~i ... .. -I ,.. z. i~¡8\!!b~~!~~ ~¡Þ1S1B1 31~:::g:fU~II~glf$!3!~is!!' .:.m~~ . . .1. II,' 1,1.1\. I. . I. . . . .11 . I· . ~. \. , II· 1.1\. . i. I· I,· I: ",~m cø:. _ co '-.I, W ~cø . _ co cø . ~ ~,!en '. . ,III W ~'~ co en, cn ,-.I O'W' ~~~~~~~'-.I _ W,- -.I ~ ~Ji W'~ - C '~. ""8J~~ ~ ~~E!J .. .~ I -: - ~ ~ . , ~ !! ~ !! !! !! I.. '..: ~.... - _ .l/_O-:- II II ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . J J J , , ~ , . J J J ~ J n n ~ ~ !¡;¡;, 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ !! !! I . I I I I IS IS I I ! ! í I II II I I . . . . ! ! III' i ¡ . J I _ \~ ,- I IiI I I 1 a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ø .il I I. ~ ~ . . ~ ~ 'I 'Ii N ¡¡¡¡ii¡¡¡¡ . ~ .. wl-",1 ~!~~II ~~i !I-CCII :i!!ril IIIW' ~J~ zCl-j ¡¡y~ I/ I~Õi!CIIO"O')O') iJ!.. tit- _ ¡¡¡ .. ... ~;; , f!o: I¡Q I:¡ 51 ¡ I: i i I , I ¡ ¡¡ ~UI i'i ¡! . ø Ii t .¡. ¡¡ i ~ 2 , 'II I ~ ~ I I , , I i ~ ~ '- :l1~ i~ '~ il i f" . .'. oj oj .. g . I ¡¡ i i I~I i !i ! ¡ II I = I III II II III I I 51 !~ ! ~ a ø ![i ,.; .1 I it . "i~ I .. ¡ër z I~' ¡WI II) I~, Ø) I 'I), 'w !~, ~ i~' < I ...: I-CI)(/)z ~ W w0[]f;;l I I III 1'1 I'D! D ~I II! ~I ~ 1:1 I: ~Ii' .¡~ ~ I! 1 I! , ~'~I~:~¡¡'¡ . > > 1-1- '~ i ø .1.'. .' ., . . 'I . . . . . _ <¡¡j' ! !: , ' , li'li I I Ii; Ii; 51' 51 ~I~I¡ ¡'Ii Ii l!I I!I~I~'I'li'i 5!=a:,:'lI!!~';li' I I I ¡¡¡¡¡i1ì¡¡'¡¡'UU I I . ¡¡ Ii Ii ¡¡, U' U' , .J':lI¡;: I ' II I I ¡ ¡. I . I I 1 1 1 : ! f- ~ ~¡~! I I I I I I I 1 I 'I: I I ] , I I I: I I o U. 0 ..., I! I I 1 I Ii! ;: I ¡ wa::z u. w 0' O~:E~ ~~:E:' _1-0'" ~ o 00 i 0: I w 'W ' I- ...' IIII,§ i < IC 'I-r;-j , ,z' a: ICI:¡ 1...1 '~. :21~ :Sl ¡:II I!! 1 ~.18~ - 'W il-! IC' OJ' ,i: t: \ I I~~~: l-ct)wl ¡CDCI-- I~ iJ! ,!.¡ ! !~ ¡'¡IiI! I! .. .. .'. I! I I E!Ei 1·¡·il!li!i!il:I'I:I:~!~1¡:¡: ~ ~ ~ ~ ..!.- ¡ W ìl ! ~i~! N N .. .. o 0 -:- - - ..1"1 ¡"I_ININi"!"i_!·,e 1ft _lei ~i"'¡ ~;I , 1 I !; I I I : : i : ' ! i I -I.... .. ..,.. "i" .1" .. .. .. .. l"I.'·¡" 010 ..!....¡. ,.1,·'·'·1"1 , . i I I ' >.--! ' I .... I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I!!~q I!! ~' I!! ~ I!! ~ I!! ~ I!! i I!! ~ I!! I i ~Ii I!!Ti' 0 ; i~ I II 1'1 I I II I . II I I, ~ ~ IJIJ II I Iii! Ii H N ; I 111,111 IJ Ii I I IIIIIIIJ II1I I! I:~jl_~ ; - :¡ í ... N -~._.- - ---..--- III ! I ! I ! I ! I ! ill ! III~ I ! I ! '111111111 'fñ I ~ ~ I I I I I I I I III I I I 1\1 I I ~ II S ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~H~ ~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~ r-iil! ~ ............... ............................ ~ 'I ' ! I ,~ I' ~ ~ .'. ~ .1.. . W WIN N.. _ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ .. ..Iw W NIN . ,. ~ ¡ ¡ £'£II!I ~ ~ 2i21i i:~ ~ Sil I!I ~ ~ 1 ITi i ¡:¡iøla ~ ~~.~~~~~~~~DOOD ~~~~~~~~onoonl n 'I' m ~ :!~~I~~I;I~~I~.;L~r::I~~If:I~,~i~1 ~ ~ ;¡L;~~I~I~~~lcøl~!~,~:I~i:t!!; ! ~ ~ ~ I\) 01-'.11- ° I"'II~ I¡.,. cø 19 UI¡,...,il-1 f UI ~1'g!1\) 1- UI _I W II\) '01 W"OI&: 1m'" ~ p 1~11¡;:@I~b!::;II~II~I¡: r!II~II~id~ll~ I w ~ 1¡;;liin I~II~I ~ r~I~II~II~llell~ila.11 I! ~ ~ ~ g;~~~~~~~~~~~~~, -. ØI~l§j~~g¡l@~~~~~~1 ' mr ! .. '. .. . . :II j !I !I ~ i~ ~ ~ I I ø !I !I !I !! ! ! '~ 11 øø' iìI :IIi /II ~ I$,~ ¡: ~ J _I. J IJ J IJ 1"1 pi pi := ~ . J ~ I,.. J IJ ,..1,..1..1,..: I I> I a a ~ III I : I I a . ~IC,~, !,~ !!. Ii = a ~ 8'= ~,I,I~i I ~. I I I I' ., : I - I I, '¡ (' -,;- !I !I .. '!I ' ',,' !I !I "I':' · ¡. !~ I'" J I i! Ii 1m 1m '. I. !I !I : '" '" II :.1 Ii Ii I ill~ ~ 11 111 !I I!I I' II ~ Z II II . .. I..' I,' 's 's 1 ~ ~, , ' , , ' I", 'I'" ~ ~ ,11I'11I ¡ I'" c ... ... ,. '. _. _ I I .... : '...... .;.: - - m "'go t tl~ ~ ! !!I~ ~'¡i¡I=I=!i!i .:.!~:~ i li'~ ~i.l. tlti~I~: ~~. ~ ~ I~ i~ :. I ¡'II ,.1 'i 11111 i.. I.. :.. ~ '.~ ~ s; ~ I'll: I!:' 1 I .N I ~ .. I'" .. -I :¡: " ¡ill ,sa!3 : m I. ." , ",' I. I' " . " " ¡iiI..., ("')m("') r: III Ii; ~ I 'CIII ; 1iI:~ .. ¡j ..: I -I : 0 -I . ,"" ~ J0,.- ... ~ tD ~ ~~ro om m "T1 Z :rJ .- : , !. i I~ :~,~ m é l!i Q ~ I J: r ("') L i i 11 11 ø ø ~ ~ ,!I !I !I !I. . I~ ~ ~ iiI::rJ -I ,. . . II !I ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ . '. IJ If ¡ ~ ~ 15 ~.~ <: < !!I!!IlIlaa¡;j¡;j¡ ¡ I!IBiB: aa'mmëi) ZCJ)(o)-I m I" ~ ... m. I ~ co ,;¡¡ U1 < :m. .. .. zi :õ' ~ J i ß ~ ~ J _ . J J J J , ¡ !! ~ !! . J , ~ J J J I~ I' ~ ~ ~.~. · a a _ III I : I I I . !3 C ~ ! ~ S = Ii = I ~ B = ~ I I ~, ~'" ~ ~ !I !! !I !I !I !! !I !I !I !! !I !! !I !I j m .~ i i ~ ~ . . ~ ~ , , ! ! I . ì ì . . ~ ~ J J I J ¡ ¡ 12 2 ~ ª :g · . ~ ~ I I . . I I . . I . I I I I ~ ~ I 8 * Ii ø ø¡ ¡ ~, I ~ i i J I ¡ J . J t J 1. ~ 11 . i i I J ~ 111 ~ " i U ~ í . Ii ; !3 Ie. = ; ~ III ¡j 8 I ¡;j ~ . . 8 II . ¡ ~ I I II ~ ø, ~11\)~~II\)~~~~i~~ I.. ~~II\) '-~~~- ;~~no 'f i :e _ cø ..., UI I\) ° ..., Ø) I\) cøUl I~ UI C1I I\) - cø ..., . . ° ° ~ ..., I~I~I _ ~ > Z 01 . W _ CoO cø ..., cø If cø W 01[:. '01 i ØI W cø CoO ° 01 ..., W cø co ,'cø 1.IUlI:0!1 I m ~ ~ _ cø Ø) I\) ..., . ° II) W W cø cø'UI ° 01 . W IØ) - UI W cø ØI ..., ,Ø) I\) 01 W .. ~ c · . , , . , . . , . . . t"I~1 ,. . Ii, r: I, . .,11. ~I'.' :.1" ". I' I..~m cø W . I\) cø cø . . _ I\) I\) _1_ _ 01 I<Ø OI,_I~;,w ,I\) Ø) UI OØ) cø,'e.>'...,' ~ -. ° ~ UI W . UI ° - W 01 ~1.I:UlJi cø 01 ~~~ð~~~ W"',~~~ J~ V - - ~ ~_ / Ii1 ~ II J i I i J Iii i i!J .1 III i ~ ~ ! !!¡ i:i Ii it If' ill ~ ~ , I I _ ~'" · · 8 iI ÌI ÌI !3 !3 ill ill II II lis . i !: S i: i: . . ~ ~ ¡¡ ¡, i. illillil i I~ iiI ~! \ Item 12- Meeting date 3-14-95 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT TITLE: / 7~:J .2.. Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a Power to Save Incentive Agreement with SDGE for the implementation of Phase I of a comprehensive energy retrofit program; adding GG149 Energy Retrofit Phase I to the FY 1994/95 Capital Improvements Program and appropriating of $207,674 from the General Fund available fund balance therefor. SUBMITfED BY: Barbara Bamberger, Environmental Resource Mana~s.¿ ~ John Lippitt, Director of Public Works REVIEWED BY: John D. Goss, City Manager (4/5th Vote: Yesl No-> Council Refemd #: 2783 & 2801 On September 7th, 1993, Council directed staff to work with Jim Bell, Director of Ecological Life Systems Institute, to coordinate with his organization to conduct a cost-free walk through energy audit and to continue working with SDGE in developing a energy retrofit package for city buildings, Council also directed staff to create a "lights-out" energy savings program for city facilities. This item responds to both referrals. Over the last 18 months, staff has been working closely with SDGE to conduct a comprehensive energy audit for Phase I in a series to retrofit city facilities, for the purpose of reducing energy and carbon dioxide (C02), resulting in a substantial cost savings through conservation practices. Phase I includes the eight most energy intensive buildings - including the Civic Center complex, Police Department and Fire Station 1, Civic Center Library, El Dorado and Parkway Center. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolutioR BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A DISCUSSION: As directed by Council, staff met with Mr.Bell and his associate, Keith Mesecher representing GeoSystems, a company specializing in lighting retrofit, to oonduct a walk-through audit. After careful consideration and ongoing meetings with SDGE & GeoSystems, staff determined there may be additional areas where the City could experience cost savings, ranging upward of $20,000+ annually, based upon additional retrofits not included in SDGE's initial retrofit package, Staff determined the most prudent way to proceed with the City's energy audit and resultant retrofit package was to continue working closely with SDGE to develop a retrofit package while at the same time hire GeoSystems to assist staff in identifying where "gaps" existed in the initial audit. As a result, GeoSystems was hired to provide technical assistance to staff in order to achieve the best possible result from retrofitting the City's lighting systems and to provide assistance to staff in negotiating with SDG&E for inclusion of additional measures. The net result was an increase of $37,933 annually, identified by GeoSystems and confirmed by SDGE, resulting in a 12 year gross cumulative savings of $452,145. 1 /.2- / ~...-~'~.'" ft·.. ".'. :':.:""J , " Item 1.2- Meeting date 3-14-95 Table 2 indicates the level of cost and energy savings and the associated CO2 reduction, consistent with the City's CO2 Reduction Strategy. Table 2 Phose I Cost, Energy and CO2 savings (expressed in dollars in kilowaJ hours) by Building: Nature 49,069 $4,184 $6,934 32 % 1.66 89,747 Center Public 104,860 $12,294 $29,566 22 % 2A 191,789 Services Fire Station 33,379 $3,324 $6,582 37 % 1.98 61,050 1 Civic Ctr 299,674 $29,824 $65,368 24 % 2.19 548,104 Library City Hall 467 $7,623 $16,474 39 % 2.16 117,910 Police 388,496 $36,777 $46,973 28 % 128 706,023 Department El Dorado 46,871 $5,227 $7,840 53 % UO 85,727 Parkway 35,812 $4,255 $18,047 16 % 4,24 65,500 Center TOTAL 1,022,628 $103,508 $197,784 27% 1.91 1,865,850 Phase II of the energy retrofit package will include a change out of the heating, ventilation air and conditioning unit for the Civic Center Complex and other energy intensive mechanical systems designated for change-out, lighting retrofit for Lorna Verde Recreation Center and Pool, Lauderbach Community Center, Community Development, all remaining fire departments, Rohr Park Complex, lighting at the baseball fields and tennis courts. Phase II is proposed to begin immediately after Phase I is complete. 3 /J. <J Irem 1-2- Meeting dare 3-14-95 Table 2 indicates the level of cost and energy savings and the associated CO2 reduction, consistent with the City's CO2 Reduction Strategy. Table 2 Phase I Cost, Energy and CO2 savings (expressed in dollars in kilowat hours) by Building: Nature 49,069 $4,184 $6,934 32 % 1.66 89,747 Center Public 104,860 $12,294 $29,566 22 % 2.4 191,789 Services Fire Station 33,379 $3,324 $6,582 37 % 1.98 61,050 1 Civic Ctr 299,674 $29,824 $65,368 24 % 2.19 548,1 04 Library City Hall 467 $7,623 $16,474 39 % 2.16 117,910 Police 388,496 $36,777 $46,973 28 % 1.28 706,023 Department El Dorado 46,871 $5,227 $7,840 53 % 1.50 85,727 Parkway 35,812 $4,255 $18,047 16 % 4,24 65,500 Center TOTAL 1,022,628 $103,508 $197,784 27% 1.91 1,865,850 Phase II of the energy retrofit package will include a change out of the heating, ventilation air and conditioning unit for the Civic Center Complex and other energy intensive mechanical systems designated for change-out, lighting retrofit for Lorna Verde Recreation Center and Pool, Lauderbach Community Center, Community Development, all remaining fire departments, Rohr Park Complex, lighting at the baseball fields and tennis courts. Phase II is proposed to begin immediately after Phase I is complete, 3 /J. . j "' -- _._---'"---_._-_.~._~--_. ---_.~..__.._---_.-- ---_._~.._-.--,-_._._.._._---.._.- _._---_._--~-- --_..__._~_._---- Item 1,1, Meeüng date 3-14-95 FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the resolution will result in the appropriation of $207,674 from the General Fund available fund balance, ($197,784 for the retrofit plus $9,890 for continengencies. Energy savings, confirmed by SDGE, will provide an annual savings of $103,508 and the City will realize a cwnulative gross savings of $508,308 five years after implementation, and over $L2 million dollars in savings 12 years after implementation, Those funds allocated for retrofitting the Nature Center ($6,934) will be booked as a loan to be repaid to the General Fund in the future. ATTACHMENTS: Power To Save Energy Agreement with SDGE 4 1.2- r _.,_...._-~---_._,----..._._._. --...---..--- "' ._.,_._--------~+-_.._~~._,----_._-_.,_..._._. ) ?~:J.2... RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A POWER TO SAVE INCENTIVE AGREEMENT WITH SDG&E FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE I OF A COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY RETROFIT PROGRAM; ADDING CIP GG-149 ENERGY RETROFIT PHASE I TO THE FISCAL YEAR' 1994/95 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM, AND APPROPRIATING $207,674 FROM THE GENERAL FUND AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE THEREFOR WHEREAS, on September 7, 1993, Council directed staff to work with Jim Bell, Director of Ecological Life Systems Institute, to coordinate with his organization to conduct a cost-free walk through energy audit and to continue working with SDG&E in developing an energy retrofit package for city buildings; and WHEREAS, over the last 18 months, staff has been working closely with SDG&E to conduct a comprehensive energy audit. for Phase I in a series to retrofit city facilities, for the purpose of reducing energy use and saving money through conservation practices; and WHEREAS, Phase I includes the eight most energy intensive buildings, including the civic Center Complex, Police Department and Fire station 1, F Street Library, El Dorado and Parkway Center; and WHEREAS, staff subsequently met with GeoSystems, a company specializing in lighting retrofits, to conduct a walk- through audit; and WHEREAS, after examining the results of their audit, staff brought GeoSystems in as a consultant to work with SDG& E and staff to identify additional cost savings from retrofits not included in the original SDG&E audit; and WHEREAS, this approach was successful, in that SDG&E identified $65,575 in annual savings in the original audit and GeoSystems identified an additional $37,933 in annual savings, which was then folded into a final retrofit package by SDG&E for a total annual savings of $103,508; and WHEREAS, staff is requesting appropriation of funds to move forward with implementation of the retrofits, which will result in energy savings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby approve Phase I implementation of . 1 /.,2..r5 -- -----,-,_.._-----_._-------~- a comprehensive energy retrofit package for the civic Center Complex, Parkway Center, Nature Center, Library, Police Department, Fire station 1 and EI Dorado Building. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement with SDG&E to implement retrofit for $197,784 plus a 5% contingency fund, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No. (to be completed by the City Clerk in the final document). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that CIP GG-149 is hereby added to the fiscal year 1994/95 Capital Improvements Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the amount of $207,674 is appropriated from the General Fund available fund balance to GG- 149. Presented by Approved as to form by tv!? ¡tJAY f2..e-~¡J6'(.r ~1tt}1i ,f}l/tfrlI úf ,p ¡fCH'/fJ/r'''%4 ~N H 1JrJ/£B1:, -r B1t!.AI5. ) &wÆ ~ Barbara Bamberger, Environmental Bruce M. Boogaard; City ~ Resource Manager Attorney C:\rs\retrofit 2 I).·¿ -,._..~~_..-_._---_.__.-. SDG.~' BUSINESS ENERGY SAVINGS _'E - POWER TO SAVE INCENTIVE AGREEMENT OWNER AGREEMENT (sd) This Agreement is entered into between SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC ("SDG&E"). a California corporation, and CITY OF CHULA VISTA ("Customer"). Contract Number See Attachment 1. In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. SDG&E agrees to: a. Select a general contractor ("Contractor"). by competitive bid, to purchase and install or replace certain equipment with energy efficient equipment, as set forth in Attachmem 1 (Executive Summary). hereafter referred to as "Equipment" located at See Attachment 1 ("Facility") in the city/county of Chula Vista, CA 91910 as set forth in Attachment 1. b. Arrange with the Contractor for the purchase and installation or replacement of the Equipment at the Facility. Customer acknowledges that the Incentive will be adjusted if th!e actual equipment purchased and installed differs from that set forth in Attachment 1. Customer also acknowledges that no incentive will be paid for equipment in excess of that set forth in Attachment 1. c. Accept payment from Customer of the amount in paragraph 2.a. and forward such amount plus the Incentive available under SDG&E's Power to Save Incentive Program ("Incentive") to Contractor as full payment for the purchase and installation or replacement of the Equipment under this Agreement. 2. Customer agrees to: a. Pay an amount to SDG&E equal to the difference between the amount payable to Contractor for the purchase and installation or replacement of the Equipment and the Incentive. This amount is currently estimated at $197,783.68, which amount must be paid to SDG&E before Contractor will begin work at the Facility. This amount is equal to the Contractor's estimate of $234,499.00 less the estimated Incentive amount of $36,715.32. Customer will pay the balance owing, If any, when the final Contractor invoices have been received and when the final Incentive is calculated. b. Pay any taxes which may be imposed on Customer's business or Facility as a result of Customer's receipt of the Incentive hereunder. Customer will provide SDG&E with their Federal Tax ID number for tax purposes. c. Cooperate with SDG&E in the verification by SDG&E of both the purchase and installation of the Equipment. d. Allow SDG&E to inspect the Equipment at reasonable times, both before and after installation of the Equipment, to verify Customer's compliance with it's obligations under this Agreement and to conduct such monitoring or other activities as may be appropriate or required to obtain full regulatory benefit CKGFORM Rev 03/07195 1 /.2* 7 (j Printed on Recycled Paper from the Facility. This paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. e. Continue using the Equipment for a period of five years from the date the Equipment is installed or replaced. Customer acknowledges that the Incentive is based upon a Customer's using the Equipment for a minimum of five years and that failure to compiy with this paragraph wi Ii obiigate Customer to pay liquidated damages to SDG&E under Paragraph 8 of this Agreement. 3. Customer represents that it has read, understands, and agrees to comply with the Power to Save Program requirements, Attachment 2 (Equipment List), Executive Summary, the Terms and Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and this Agreement. 4. The totai potential Incentive for the Facility under this Agreement is $36,715.32. The actual Incentive may be lower than the total potential Incentive if the actual installation cost is less than the estimated installation cost provided by SDG&E in the energy analysis. 5. The funding approved for this Program is limited and will be credited on a first-come, first-serve basis to qualified Customers according to the date of verification of purchase and installation. 6. The selection, purchase and ownership of the Equipment is the sole responsibility of Customer. SDG&E makes no representations as to the safety, reiiability, and/or efficiency of the Equipment selected, or any components thereof. SDG&E makes no warranty, whether express or impiied, including any warranty of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose, use or application of the Equipment. 7. This Agreement shall be effective on the date it is signed by an SDG&E representative. Purchase and installation of the Equipment must be completed within gO (ninety) days from the effective date of this Agreement unless otherwise agreed by SDG&E and Customer. 8. Atter making an Incentive payment to Customer, in the event the Customer fails to perform in accordance with this Agreement, said Customer will be responsible for paying Liquidated Damages equal to the amount of the Incentive payment attributable to the period of non-performance plus interest at the leqal rate. The interest charge represents the estimated lost earnings to SDG&E assuming these funds had been available to SDG&E for investment during the period of performance. CKGFORM Rev 03/07/95 2 1,).- g" "-_. ---..._.~-_. CITY OF CHULA VISTA SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC Signature Signature M. J. Allen Print Name Print Name Manaoer, Marketino Services Title Title Date Date Is Company Incorporated? Yes - No - Exempt_ Please provide Federal Tax 10 #: Federal Tax ID # CKGFORM Rev 03/07/95 3 1.2 ·JI ~ . .__w , .- "'..-.. __~___ . "_"__.______,,. m._"..·..____. TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Contract ~ormation. By this Agreement SDG&E offers to enter into a Termination shall be effective uean actual receipt by Customer or its contract with Customer upon the terms and conditions stated herein. Any representative of the notice, or 4 hours after deposit of the notice in the additional or different terms and conditions which have been proposed ber. U.S. mail, whichever occurs first. Upon such termination, an equitable Customer prior to the date of this Agreement are hereby expressly rejecta . adjustment shall be made by agreement between SDG&E and Customer for Any additional or different terms an conditions proposed by Customer after the reasonable value of Customer's performance underthis Agreement prior the date of this Agreement shall be of no force or effect unless expressly to termination. agreed to in writins by SDG&E. Customer accepts and shall be bound by 11. Audit. During the performance of this Agreement and for a period of the terms and conditions of this Agreement when it executes the agreement or when it commences performance. No other form of acceptance shall be five years following the date of final payment, $DG&E or it contracted binding on SDG&E. representative with a certified public accounting firm may audit any cost, payment, settlement, or supportin¡&dOCumentation resultin~ from any items 2. Performance. Customer shall perform its obliaations under this set forth in this Agreement. SOG E or its representative s) shall conduct Agreement in a skillful and professional manner to So &E's satisfaction. such audit(s) at reasonable times and in conformance with generally accepted auditing standards. Customer shall retain aU necessary records 3. Warranties. Customer expressly warrants that aU work performed and and documentation for the entire length of this audit period and shall fully all materials furnished by it or its subcontractors, shall be in accordance coo§erate with any audit(s). with applicable safet"b standards, governmental regulations, and DG&E shall notify Customer in writing of an~ exception(s} taken as a specifications, and shall e free from defects in materials or workmanship. result of an audit. Customer shaH reimburse SOG E for the amount of any Customer shall, at its expense, within a reasonable time after receipt of exception by refunding the amount to SDG&E within thirty dat of receigt written notice from SDG&E of any such defects, repair or replace any of such notice (or, alternatively, with prior written 'N'8roval 0 SDG&E, y defective work or materials. deducting such amount from amounts payable by S &E in the future). If Customer fails to reimburse SDG&E for any valid exce~tion within the thirty 4. Independent Contractor. Customer is performii:r its obligations under day period, Customer shall also pay interest on t e amount, accruing this Agreement as an independent contractor, an no principal-agent or monthly, at a rate of 10% per annum. This provision shall not preclude emglo~er-emPIOyee relationship shall be created. Customer represents to Customer from disputing the validity of any exception(s}. SO & that it is properly equipped, organized, staffed, financed, experienced, qualified, and licensed to perform its obligations hereunder. 12. Subcontractor Audit Clause. Customer shall include a clause in its 5, liens. Customer shall be responsible for ~ayment of anx liens or claims a~reements with subcontractors reservin~ the right during the performance o its agreement and for a period of five ( ) years following the date of final by persons who furnish material or per orm work. t the time of payment under its agreement for its own employee representative{s}, or its Customer's com~letion of its obligations under this Aåreement, u~on contracted representatives from a certified public accounting firm, and/or for reguest by SDG& ,Customer shall provide satisfactory evi ence that it as representatives from SDG&E, to audit any cost, payment, settlement, or bald -all liens or claims of such persons. Until all such liens or claims have supporting documentation resultinr from any items set forth in its een fully discharged, SDG&E may retain from any amount due Customer agreement with the subcontractor. his clause shall require subcontractor under this Agreement such amounts as may be necessary to meet any such to agree to retain all necessary records and documentation for the entire liens or claims. lenJl¡th of this audit period, and to agree to fully cooperate wÎth all such au ItS. 6. Compliance with Laws. Customer shall be deemed to be familiar with, and at all times shall comply with, all applicable federal, state, and local 13. Insurance. Customer shall maintain in effect during the life of this laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and executive orders, all applicable Aibeement Comprehensive General Liabm~ Insurance, including contractual safety orders, and all orders or decrees of administrative agencies, courts, lia ility coverage for liability assumed by ustomer in this Agreement, with or other legally constituted authorities having jurisdiction or authority over limits of not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence for bodily injury and Customer or SDG&E, which may now or hereafter exist, including, but not property damaite combined. Evidence of such insurance shall be made limited to, those relatinë to the storage, transportation and disposal of available to SO &E upon request. hazardous substances. ustomer acknowled~s that it is the generator of hazardous substances located at the Facility (' azardous Substances") and 14. Disputes. If the total amount to be paid Customer under this that SDG&E's contractor may be removing and transporting such Hazardous Agreement is less than $100,000, any controversy or claim arising out of Substances to a disposal, treatment or recycling facility. or relating to this Agreement, or the breach of this Agreement, shall be Customer acknowledges that it is required to comply with Rule 2 of settled by arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Rules of the SDG&E's Tariffs which places certain requirements on Customers who American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered operate e~uipment that causes detrimental voltage fluctuations on SDG&E's by the Arbitrator{s} may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The system. he ~arties agree that detrimental volta't:e fluctuations are those decision of the Arbitrator{sJ will be a condition precedent to the right of any in excess of I EE Recommended Practice 519. ustomer acknowledibes le~al action. Unless the parties agree otherwise, arbitration hearings will be that the operation of certain energy efficient equipment, such as varia Ie he d in the City of San Diego, California. The prevailing party will be speed drives, electronic ballasts, and other power conversion devises can reimbursed for any and all attorneys' fees including those Incurred in any detrimentally impact SDG&E's system. arbitration hearing. In no event shall the arbitration or settlement of any 7 . Indemnity. Customer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless SDG&E, controversy delay the performance of this Agreement. its officers, em~loyees, and agents, from and against any and aU lawsuits, 15. Validity. The invalidity, in whole or in part, of any terms or conditions claims, losses, iabllities, damages, and expenses (including attorneys' fees) of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of any other terms or or any kind whatsoever: conditions. a. arising out of or related to Customer's failure to comply with Paragraphs 5 and 6 above; 16. Remedies. If Customer fails to perform or comply with any terms or b. arising out of or related to materials purchased or installed pursuant conditions of this Agreement, SDG&E mad' consider such failure or to this A9reement; noncompliance as a breach of the contract, an may cancel or terminate this c. ansin~ out of or related to the transportation, treatment, recycling, Agreement, in whole or in part. SDG&E expressly retains all of its rights or disposal 0 the Hazardous Substances; and and remedies provided by law or equity in the case of breach, and no action d. for inJuries to or death of any person, including, but not limited to, by SDG&E shall constitute a waiver of any such right or remedy. The employees 0 SDG&E and Customer, and for all loss, damage, or destruction remedies reserved in this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to any of any property, includin~, but not limited to, property of SDG&E and other remedies in law or equity which may be availab!e to SDG&E. The Customer, arismp' out 0 or in any way connected with Customer's election of one or more remedies shall not bar the use of other remedies performance or ack of performance of the terms of this A~reement, unless the circumstances made the remedies incompatible. If SDG&E whether or not the conduct of Customer is negligent, and whet er or not reasonably determines that Customer has breached or is in anticipatory the active or passive ne~ligence of SDG&E, its employees, or a~ents, breach of another agreement with SDG&E and that SDG&E's ability to caused or contributed to t e injuries to or death of such persons, or 0 the recover the unearned portion of an incentive paid under such agreement is loss, damage, or destruction of such propertJ; excet, this indemnity at risk, SDG&E may offset such unearned incentive amount against the provision snail not apply if said injuries to or eath 0 persons, or loss, incentive payable under this Agreement. damage, or destruction of property, is caused by the willful act or the sole 17. Survival. The obligations imposed on Customer by Paragraphs 3, 6, 7, negligence of SDG&E, its employees, or agents. 8. Assignment. Customer shall not assign or subcontract any of its rights 10, 11, and 12 shall survive cancellation or termination of this Agreement. or ob!iËations under this Arrreement without the prior written permiss,ion of 18. Complete Agreement. This Agreement, which includes any SDG& . In no event sha SDG&E's written permission be construed as supplemental documents attached hereto, sets forth the entire agreement discharging or releasinR, Customer from the fulfillment of any of its between SDG&E and Customer, and suhersedes all other oral or written obligations specified in t is Agreement. provisions. No modification of any of t e provisions shall be binding on 9. Time. Time is of the essence of this Agreement, and SDG&E reserves SDG&E unless expressly agreed to in writing. the right to terminate or cancel all or any part of this Agreement without 19. California Public Utilities Commission. This Agreement shall at all times penalty in the event that Customer fails or is unable to perform its be su~ect to such changes or modifications as deemed necessary by obligations under this Agreement within the specified time. SDG& to comply wIth orders, rules and regulations of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California as it may, from time to time, direct 10. Termination. a. Customer may terminate this Agreement for its sole in the exercise of its jurisdiction. convenience bð written notice to SDG&E until such time as SDG&E pays any funds to ustomer pursuant to this Agreement, at which time such termination right shall end. b. SDG&E may terminate all or any part of this Agreement upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) Customer becomes bankrupt or insolvent; ~ii) Customer assi!,; ns or sublets any part of this Agreement without SDG&E's written permission; (iii) Customer fails to perform its obligations under this Agreement in a skillful and professional manne'r, and in accordance with the applicable sgecifications; (iv! Customer fails to perform its obligations under this greement in a prompt and diligent manner; or (v! ,Customer fails to perform or comply with any terms or conditions of thIs Agreement. c. SDG&E may suspend or terminate all or any part of this Agreement at any time for its sole convenience by written notice to Customer. /J. -10 CKGFQRM Rev 7127/94 ---- ._._._,._.,.._-~_._---_._.._-------"---,---~-_._---- ATTACHMENT 1 (Summary of Attachment 1) CITY OF CHULA VISTA Contract # Customer Project Address Incentive 4219 Police Department 276 4th Avenue 4220 City Hall 276 4th Avenue 7482 Parkway Community 385 Park Way 7584 Fire Station 447 F Street 7585 Nature Center 1000 Gunpowder Pt. Road 7586 EI Dorado 315 4th Avenue 7587 Library 361 F Street 7588 Public Services 276 4th Avenue TOTAL $36,715.32 /).-// ---...---.-. -_.~._--_.__._-_."----_.._-"---~~~---- "~- ,,- ...~...... ... .f ~ .0 _:«0 Z >--::.. ~-,~ I ~ '" '" -.J ~ '" '" Nt" (! " '" ¿ ..,. 0 g c~ .. 0. E "''' ;¡; _ 0 ~ .. _.. ~ <;¡; V> .. o .0""._. > Cf)°m .eLf)._ ~c:- ~-G ë "S;.Q32 .-co ~ . "'1015 ~~.5 '0;.... o V> 'E;: ~ "'.. .!!~ z »", "'a. .c.... f-- E'EE "''0 - 'S.. c¡ 0 "''''2 ~".E ïii8 ~ ô:i g Ci';;; ¡¡¡ ~ z. w.. U ..... "'C E .s::. .......:= <t Z Q)'-..... "'t)C ('¡ R: 0 - '" V> '" "'" 'C' I-' ü "'E:5Cõ -acE C' ~ .<; ~ '" " 0 ,,"'. '" o '" 0 » '" '" _ ", '...'......._ U ID (I) _0 E Q) :¡¡ ::~1i) ~ ~ (¡) E .~ "E ;0 t: "ëñ:;; 0'E 0 "ü,> .2".D u"'" w.. ã. 0 E ~ u ._ .. .... ..'" .~~! ~~ li{ "'C .Q IV en g (I) ,_ ~,:>ê,.:,;.:;;... "'1U'1O m", .8..,,:: ~ 0. E E c: "E:'> '0::.:: "'.- ¡¡:: - '........, V> - <;¡ _ f!..",.,. '" '" '" '" <;¡ '" -P.,.,.."... W >- "''' "" 0 '....'..,'.'.."...,',...'.."',. E~~ 1;u gj/ > ^" '" I- - »E '>"..... s.r.. "" '" >0 E' \'}i;¡j''C' ~ « 2~~ æg ]¡~.~:ã' ..,. 0::::: V> '" '" . E '" E.. . > ;;: ...J 0::: = .D '" ~" .." .. '" (.) 0::::: Æ 1U' Ci 5 0 -g f,~.(I """ -== .gQ.~cn c:ctI_ 0) W..,. -Qj~", .2v> < X...J Q)cm_ roo> m .s::. ..c C'tI c: > en I- '" E E E ._ '" '. W· ""._ ~ > " ¡¡: . -"'<;¡ 0", .... ~'O"'" <:V> g 15.~ ·-CQ) .-» _ m ,.... '¡j"'''''~ 'OE' w o::~.¡; ",,,,I-,,, §'" '" o'C:!:. ::.<':.~ og (! _"'" ~ ë ~ > æ_ ~ øca.c omc::.;:::.::£o ìi 0 >. 0 .- c u c: C1J "'"') '-.s fü Q) m B <"" .E-Vlg .o:z >. « cn.~_._ Q)ro -:::: c:""" m c-.... o c: :::J W '-:::I 0 .- Q) C oð "'C.s! en 7ó Õ c: (9 '::; (IJ c: "Uc..ctlo eU.2 ~---QJUJ a.~ tá E~:5-o 2- 'g Eu>.c CV.s::. C1.I ..c ro w ~ E - 8§"Q(/)..c:;: S c::: <lJ :.;:; Q) rn (f) en C1J '-m-oc -c 0 E V> _ .;;.;; ~ = :;¡ 1::: Q) C ._ m .... m ... .. N"'E"Ucn /VQ) G.I c~ C>. .¡::. ~ ~ '0 ~ 0" .. '" '" ~ '" "'" .. Ë... c¡ E Ci '" E ~ .2 5: .¡::;¡ .. EE"o "'10 '" u::;; .g '" .-. ~ <;¡ E E r:. ~ ~ o (/) en c::J E I.... .. C 0 "- "'01'-U 0 '" . - c__ :J_ __ .. ~ .g .;; ,g;;: V> .= g Ví I- ..... m c: . .~ 1:J s: Z 01V>"'''= """ 5: LU c:.......õQ) -I.;:: ~ · >" o. " , , _ '" Q 0 0·' n . . . u u õro5s 0 : . M .... < ~"''''» ='" N /.:.2. 01- "''''''''' o!?, ~ .I.'?~ _ ." ". ." "- .. ~~- õ < " .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p , ~ ?' :-< !" I~ ~ "'~ § " ",,~ ~ " ..................;:::0 .............f'0:::::a " ...... (D -n \3' ;:.: ctI wID ø (1) <5 chilD (þ _.3 ::r ..... x' ~ :T~ 0"1_.......... -I~ ~ x ' " (þ ßI a _ _ 0 - '" ~O " (t) ro a c c , '" c -. , '" x' Q. 5. ~ -. ~ ., =" ¡;¡ , :T ~ ~ ¡;¡ - "'- >< ..,..a ..... '" ~ w ~ ~( ë 0 IU .þ. ~ g ~ Ä " ~ :::'" " (b ~. a ~ "- '" _'I'" '" ~ " 0 gj~ tf) n cr . In n 3i . o ::: cr " N aflQ· f" ~. " - , 3 -. (1) 5" :::;::;&jï1 ¡¡¡I~ ~ "- => " ~ '" " => " " ~£ ~ - 0 ~ ~ 0 " " " - ~ m - cr m 0 0 - '" - => => DJ ~ (/) ~'" '" ~ ",c. c. ~~ => ---j ;:" =" § C <1> '" ~ ~ ..... '" o ~ ~ N~ <1> q ~ ib x , " " ,N " ¡;; N " -. ë <1> <1> <1> -n- ro :E S; ,,'0 !:i " ¡;¡ " => => WOO t: ~. <1> " " - ~ "'3 ~.=:3 , 0 '" ¡¡; '" ¡¡; ¡¡; --j <1> :T '" " " 3 "3 3 "''' !l J\J tf) iiï§ o , " , -n " ~o ~c. --j '" ¡¡; 3 I" I' > <-. , '" 0 " 0'" .. en"- '0 c.- '" _ 0 n ~ ;u -. '" => - n , " 0 ~ .-"-:,-: --en ~~m N '" < " N ~ '" '" ::T -. Q '" '" '0> '" 'co -::Sd '" 0> ~ '" '" :§. ,cg.,< '" '" W 0 "en c -" '" ><"<3 ::¡; -. 0 0 0 w '" " " 0 i-> ~ i-> :.. - <Q " '" '" '" 0> 0> :'" c. en :! m .. .. -. O::s " 0 " .. .. N '" <Q " ' .. '" ~ :., '" " -'" '" '" 0> '" '" - '< 0> '" ~ '" 0 ... .;: .;:!.. oli' o ~ ~3 -" ...- -" c. S" en n 0 ...!;! (;) =P- ~ m I -" ~~ Z " 0' " ¡¡¡ " - I -~ 1,)-13 '- -_...~._---,-- ~_....- -~-_.__."-- ,- ~-:.:.;;.. ... ~ f .. .c .. ~- i:~ o..'_~ w ~ crð~ C)c~ c .. CI)~ ~¡; "iâ- E1n '.;:J 0 "0 W ~ ..~ ~;~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ; C)... 'Vol 'I;t V .,.... N M CO ('\ "<:t ~0C) ~ ri ~ ~ r ~ Ñ ~ ~OC ~ ~ ~ ~ CO·- W > .. ,<(I) ~.~-~. M m ~ ~ M ~ 0 0 CC)~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ....c.:> 0 <q' 0 0 ..... ..... 0 0 E .-.;> ..... .> ~ 4t_C"CI~ C U) .... :;'-:;':/"::{:;- ·····;:ui·~ g ~ ~ g 8 ~ ~ ~ i;),C)~ ~ co~ 'V. M. 'q". 1.0.. Ln. ...... ~'E= <q' LO ..... N M ...... ~ LO ê~~ M ..... ~ N w·0¡0 - t;:. ._'. o ". en ~ u - I;: .. .- 0:: ~ u o..e ( ) .... ~ c. _cen .. .. .c " 0 .. ..., ~ < u ~ "2 o ~ (/) c ~ , co· c _ ro CII CII ro CII E ::> ~ E E _ c ro ....: L... ....."0 co ..... c ro_ 0 0 0 c_ o:J CllCOÕ Õ Õ COco Õ 0 Cd) 1-(1) (1) Q) I- ( ):2 0..... EN~ E ~ ~~ EN E E ~ -=~ rof:1!V ro!IJ "'5!1J rof:1 ro ro ~ .- c.'" -~- - - ~- -~ - - .~ en .¡:~ ~...t1"Cl CD ro ~cnl'tl ~.,..!. ~2..... ~ ro ~ 0 u~ I-~"O ~"O I-rn"O I-~ I-~CII 1-"0 Ü CII en -= -- C N C - c: ...... (/) ." co c: c c: CI.I_ ~'~ro ...... co ~~ro ø,¡ =_ ø co ~ Q)'c cO ~_CII b_CII ~..oûj ~_(;j ~~2 ~!!(¡) C'1 (1)1-5 <o:;tCllro vCfJrn vëro vVlro v- vCllro ..... ~ LLrn=:; LLrn::; U. = LLC'I:I= IJ....CU LLC'I:I= C 011I ..... ' = co , = ro I .9:! m , = ro I Q) 'ë. I = ro ::J c: Q) C CO ~ ..0 N 2 .a N ~ ..0 ...... E ..0 V ~ 0 ME .a 0 ro,.g.:J . 0 . 0 . !E 0 . U . ;:: ..... . 0 II) ::E 0..;.... - 0 ~"O.- =-o.-CII C( )._ =~._CII CQ)ÕCII =u.-W ~o~~ ~~5~ N~5~ ~ 5~ ~~§e ~ ~e ~~52 ~ 8~Q= - \- \- .... \- ~ .... \- \- ...... .... ~.... ~...... \- .- 0 ~ ' ,-~~- ,-~-.... '~~-- ,-~....- ,-\-~.... ,_~....x _ row" - r::: u -' - cox - 0 -' - r::: 0 x - 'x _ r::: 0 -- .- _ > I> e ro ~ >< e (t ~ .- e ~ ( ) >< e ro ( ),-- e ( ) '--'- e (t ~ lL. ( ) Cij.: <:I:> --.- ___lL. _c_._ __lL. _r:::~lL. _...._ 0 _ ~ Q) cr 0/ lL. ( ) cr 0/ to ( ) q> q.¡ lL. Q) '{I q.¡ '"iT (1) q.¡ C 1.0 (1)[ cr 0/ lõ ~ ~ å N OC...._N OC__<D oc_I_.... oc-l_I_ ocN"'I.... OCIN,__S ~ -.S"'I"'1 .¡ ~ f.Ô ,...: có ci 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡~./y ~ N N --...-.-.-""... .._-._^'- ...--_.. -. -----.--.- N N N N N N N N I"I~'~~ .. ~",; ..-~ ~~ !" I'" ~I~ ~1-'~I~ ''''~,~ -'" .þ. , !b "rn -., 0'1 ::)::1 (..) .....' q) CU __ CD ...... -.. ::1::1 I'\J ::I ì1 !!. ~... :!!!!. ~.... < ~ @ ~ '< "~3 ::!1i3:r..... 0;g, VI ~ < x" ~ ~ ò ~ ~ ~ ò ~ Q ~ ~ ~ x' ro 0 ~ to ..... a :E 0 õ &: ;¡; --~~ c__~ _m_ - _ '< c I~ ~.m~ _ c...,............. ..,..,.....- -, '0 - c -,....._ ........0- ..., 0 OJ Å ro 0 CJ Å ~ "'tI g n:š:: ..., ~ 1(1) (t) ~ w..... = "'tI 0 š: œ~a~ VI~.a~ o~3º 0 9 m.þ. ~;~' ~~~g 0 ". ". c:.... c ::;;;:1':¡: 0 0:...."" c crgl\J crgw::I ~ o' ,80 C· ~ ::I ~~~ ~~~..... ~.~ ~'3~ ~ ~ .- ~~~ ~~~ ....."J;.:r a. ..... ~ m .... :E m ler 0 ~ 0 Coo D.I ;:;: en Q) ;:;: (f) ~I·m ..... OJ::!. ... I'D ::I~~ ::I~~ wC/) ~::I::I ~VI c...... a....... tII-I ca. n OJTI'\J CU....I'\J _...... 09 ~::::!. ¡¡; ~ D.ï (þ ~ w [I~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 i? ~ 3 ~ 13 @ ~ @ g ~~{II ~~{II ~~ ~~ Qw§ ~ß)g: ~ 3 '" i " I > ~ '- '" o '" CTO)(ñ CJ)::¡- 1:J"-~ tD·- 0 n ~ ::0 -. '" => - n ~ {II ..~ -;;:cnm ...... I'\J ~~~ to W -.... -.. ...... I'\J =-_.~ ~ ~ ~ -.... ~ I'\J ~ ~ ~ª~ ~ m ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ t ~~ CJ)O _,gJ·tD ;:ti:" <:'3 I'\J 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 .~~~~ . . . . . . . . ':-"to' ::J ~ ~ g g ~ g g g'..~~~ en:' ~,-,-. m ~ ~ ~~g ....... fA fA 0&9 ....... fA (QUI'" to W 0> {A -.. fA CD ...... "'_to o (.¡.) ,þ,. 0> Q') (..oJ 0> CD _ ....'< -.. ...... W 01 ...... .b. N W ~ '< ~ m ()CII o==. !!l3 -'" .. - -'" Co ::¡ CJ) no .,. g G') ~po Ii m _"II ;:.:! z ""'''' ëi1 ~ - -"'. -- 1-1-1.5' _ ~._.....~---._-_. -"--'--""'~"-'- - .- ,- \rt "'- . ~.st:., C)l~ ...~f ~ --... " .a .. ~ <$'> z >-" ..> 0.'-:' 0 UI ~ 0 ci eð; M Clc" ... c" U).š M 'tf~ 0 $.. 0 ..- ,..: E1ií '<t ;:0 ... ~,~ .. ...... >- . .- '" ... '" '" 0 '" .... .. >.: - 0 '" '" '" '" .... tn-tn '" .. '" ... '" .... ...-&1) en ... ... ... " 0 c <Ii CU- M W· ..;> ... .. en "c' jñ". . 0 0 '" 0 0 M C 0)";';"; 0 0 " 0 0 I() ..C¡¡: 0 0 0 0 0 ";' E'- >.>: M C ru- e',?...: >,'--", 't:' ... '" ~ '" '" <0 '" '" '" N 0 0> 0)0'1>0, '" ~ '" ~ '" ¡'=:è ri oJ ri ~ <D ... c> c>¡¡: co w"',,::.:: .M . ,(1)_ ... ~ õ "--(11 ~ u ~ '" ~...- o u ~ 0_<1.1 '" ~ '" 0. ~ '" c _C'" <0 ~ ~ra.c "' .. 0 f-O > e ., ",0 '" z- < ~ ~ t: o ~ 0 ,,; z . 'C C '" '" 'C E c '" .E "'''' c " EÞ< o ~ .- :J ",M õ.", -u. 'C .- .. N' C C ~ " ~M "§ '§ ~ ~::E f-.c Q; ,,- t3 '§ 'C 'C .!" co -' '" ..§ '" c ~;;; 1(;1 '" '" - ë " i:? ë :J LL!2= :. ;;; '" :J 0 ' - '" 1 0 "'''''' " " ' ::E "' ~~I '" ;;; '" "'-, ::E C!' :J c:: 1 5 5 :J :J c:: ci 0 ci 'V ...... C Q) o 01 ' 0 :§ '" 0 ~ ~~ 0 g.c~~ J 0 iE "'C .þ .2 .c w1ij W '¡¡; _ i:?IW '¡¡; « j§ '*~ ro u g § ~I~ j§ ~I - - '" I I- '" â ~ ~ ~IO '" ;;; . dJ C{I <'f...... 0 C gN E. ... ~ E .S ~ E.S ~ 0"1 I- '" a::N....-..- d ~ N M .. ..; .,; ,..: M M M M M M M M I). ./1' --.-- .--... --... ---_.._-~.-.-.--~--,---_. '" 1"'1" iNj;; w .., ~ '1'0'......1.......1::0 I...... -"'Ni;o 1->I~iN '" I~" I~'''' '<" U - \l) -I » (") j:!ll<þ':chi! ~!5.~ œ. .þ.. t I. 'CD oro'cb ro OI:J'cbiro 00 ro CD ::J :J" :j ~ 1m ~i~ ~ "11'-I:J ~ " Q,i:Ji=:- c: = '< ~ :J CD ~ CD !~ ~a "He. a ï1 CD 'CÐ 0 _.¡Cb 1(1) 0 . 3 ~ _.....c_ I~ ~kò i~ I~:rt, KÒ ~ -- !:t kã '" I~:£ll..., ~ )': ......(1) 10 . » 0 i~ ò ~ ;: IE" ro«1 ~ " 0:::TCI)Q ... I~ig ~ I:': '" -, ~. CD ;:; ¡s: n 1iJ¡ Ig ['< II\.) m lit) ¡-< .þ. ,ëÞ êb ¡< IA iD '< :J :I: (") IÕI~I?' Q.I~ ? ICD 2'j<D ~ 1(11-' CD :::: I'" ~.~ "" " ",,10 ur"'C 0 :E '" !(I 0 ~. I" '31 - '" 3: ~ CD :J - (1) 0 (I) _. ,O"!o N o Š .þ. g Q. f" giQ.If" gOI'" a.:::' ;=t'(Þ";rÈ m 1"-- , 2. .;, " I~I~I~ = Ib " fif!~I~ ë)' ~ ~ -," z :$ o 3. .t>- OJ·:J .þ. 0 >~!l)..... 0"0"0 '" - 0 (/)1......:0 cr -'0 - :J .. -. < OJ -i "" ....... cr1m ~IO"lm o 0 CD Õ'c: = ~:;" 0- íit ~ß)m .......IO"¡m ....CD .. ... ã)=(J) ß) ~I(I) w'O) (/) Q)"'OJ!(./) ;1:'" -< ~ 3 o -. ca ëD . ~I~ j ::I -1-. 5.15f -I '" =1-< ~ 33 5i ~.oo en 0. " C o.'~I"" -" ~ CD ~ (") I" ~ 1m '''' ~ CD !!t", '" N wl- N W lit tv "'N " -. .. ...... (t) _. c: ~ lãI §. Q) ...,1[/)1- i~l(¡) ","0 CD 6'':< °3.33 :E ¡;;- ~1~13 ii) :IE W ~ ~ " :J '" 3 <- 'º- 3 ¡¡: :!I:T3 §3 :::!:I;:::::¡:3 1-13 ~ 0 CD N"O ro :;,- '-0 CD """0 1::;'"'0 CD " ;¡ a.~ CD CD CD Q) !:t, '" ...... g, N (f !:tN'" N1UI <1> <1> ...... - 3...... ::: , I' I ~ "'- (I) c. -. o " " ."" o , " o , " ¿] I~ CD Q) _. CD ~ ~ O:J ",:J ~ "':J ~ ." => " =:[1) ~o. IN 0. I~ 0. "'0. I~ a. 0 :J 0 ~. :5. 3. (I) c;I I~ 3 10- :J a. '" -< ,~ 3 ::;: !g. (Q(1)=:m co ,- I~ (1)0.00 ¡;;- ¡~ " CD ;;+([) " 13 " :J"<1> Q)D":Jo 3 I~ !3 0. ~Cñ :J '< 0 3 'J ," ., ~ c..:T~3 I!" 1-'" ¡'" õ' <1>1:> (J) CD.- CD :> o a o Q) "C :J .. '" < Ci):Joo. 0 në.: Qo:J-~ " c: -, t: CD -. ~ -:J ~9!.~g !!t(Q :» :» õ' 0- :J õr en ~ :J W ocn_...,... c... CD " CD Q) ...... 0 0 " en 00 :J < :J .., 0" - -.ã ~ 5' £ '< CI)QI~ 0 G) <1> ~ < (Q :J 0 "0 " - :J 0 CD en _ c tD e: 0 '" <1> c: (j)' <'-' £!. Q :;0 m ~ :J ID-(mä;' lOa. ~ ~ 5' '< -, m ffi Q) Q, ø d " .. :J ('I) :J = CD '" :> '" Õ' U) :J A...:;;: - - < ~ ~. c: g. . ¡¡. :;' 3 3 3 <1> -i CD 10 '" etg:J::J'" :» C/I ::!: m \Q . 0 CD .., CD CD en ;¡ '" :J UI..,__ >< :J 0 0(1)"01» C ";?cnm CD a.:J :J "'C Q) 2: 3 -<m'<CD m '" ~ :E. ~. " CD ~ 3 . en g= ~ () N '" ::r-tD " m -m -<-cÈ'td - <1> W CD 0 ~ s: N .... '" 3 ~ :J ;a.~(f c:: co .... .... '" ~ ~cø,,< <0,< .. - - ~ N m ,N c: '<0 _-i:J" > -I , '" - 0_ :J":J"<1> '" 0_ <1> <1> 3 ;;a - iiI .. :J" < '"'<1> <1> :J <1> eno - ""3 .. <1> W -< m _tI)',(t)-. C' =:-(1) ",". < 3 CD :J <1> 31:> c: :E -. !" 0 N m !" :3"~ '" '" '" et ~ m ~ '" i:> ~ -(0 ~ cQ' ~ .. ~ ... m N .... ULc.; --c: <1> era. " '" ~ a."'<1> CD -<1> :J 0 '" 0. 5'(11 c: '" 0 Ir en ,i' o èi 30 ::!. I»,.m 0 <1> 0 o-g-g :S.:o :::I a. ;:to <1> '" 0 ." ." :::I:,o"tD <' 3 ..., -. :::J .... (g. (þ .., CD <1> 3 o ~- ." ." '" iD en ....I.C; ~ - -"'<1> '" '" co '" 1m - '< 0 '" <1> '<0" '" '" '" <D .. 3 :J -< .Q CD_=: c: oa. "'-3 (") ~ c: <1> - !!. ~ ::r Q) 0 :J a. <1> _ "" ~ -' g. _. CD 0 .. 0 ;i1 ·;<.m" Ö' '" OJ <1> 3 a. 0", :J .. _."0 m Z '" o :: ~ a. <1> - -:J -< (") !!t3 - <1> <1> <1> '" ~ 1:> ::;: ii1 -" CD W ~ 33~ :» ..- :E~'< 0 t:J _CD 5' '< <1> -< 0. " erèi 0-.. CD W __ c et Q) z :> o :J ö: õ' :s. 9 - ~s: < _:J :J CD ¡¡;- "'0<0 " @o .en 5'en 3 ~ .. <1> õ~ ~ " 0 0 1:> i" ...- g G) c 0 " c... :'Qo r+ ;:+ .... " <: m :J I N cO 1:1>'.' N 0 '" ~-""O ~;~. z: 1»,' go I'D ;r m.: .... ---'.~ -- J,). ./ '1 ~/ I -..--.- . .... m_~__~_~~_ , , 'j.c~' ... '.:4 J!! ~£':m .,,',_.<ftI.> ~~ L&r:~ oð:w C)<c... O:cu UJ-š ~-.-:... ,~,... ftI'''-'"' E:'t; >;0 :0 an :~ '"' ~. 0> ~ iO N N en 1.0 ~ «>1 ~ - M 1.0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ "'..~....... '" '" ~ ~ M" ""I ~~O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CUOC ·'c 0-- 1ñ W..,i:¡ UJ o < Q; ê I ~ø ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 c:.~:" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ca·C§ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ::E,.->:~ g¿" a.. I Q)':-CIS- 1::::'....: C~ ~._ .c 0 E . '" "'0:> ...... N 0 -g ~ M "'it <D >.'ø·"i:" co 0 0 0 co J),..... <D ~..~~ N ~ q ~i ~ ~ 1.0 (þ~>.c N..... ~I::...... M c .. ¡:; . -c " WCl)~ .ê~g .... ~ 0 o '" "- ::;;"- . -c u '" ü5 ::E =¡fij . . ....- E iE Æ d¡ g e t1 ~ 0 1i3 Ë 0:: - t= -x> 0-......: " .- ~I" 0 E c a:::""u « . 0::00' Ocu ._Z OuE 0ì3c. Q. Q)..r::. ....:"'" 0 - UOOW C~'O _C UJ e !E Q) _ 0 Q) () a:: ~ftI~ OO~~ oo~ .. 0 ~> I:: _ c '" ~ "") tf 1I).0 ro~cð§ < 5~c~ I~UJO ro~g.g ~§~:: ::;;<.9>-0:> uua.u J I E EI Ei E .91 ~ ~.~ ~I (1J <II' 0 0 c: 0 - ....1 U) (I) 0 U) "" 01 C c: en c: -c ~ ~ ~ ~ -Iè ~I ffi LI¡ E~"ci 0 o"C => ~"ci ..... ro u.~ ffiÆ ffi.~ ~I'~ 5 f! E :£; :: ffi ::I' ~ :J c: :J É a.; §-: .- :J ro-'- c: oi:J 0 ._ :J 0 - :110 ~ .. _I;: I- " ~I UI U U = u, U " t:: u, UI .g. ftI N ~ is, ~ ~ 0 g 0 UQ) g 0 U 01 glo w ...... v. _. => w' O· c: c: c:.--. ::> I C ~ :E ~ ª ~'« -0' 0 :J ....: "C :J ....:..... "C:J _ (D « "01 :J'....; G.I .... en ca - c: cl . Q) C· Q) c oð Q), c . 00 w.crol "''' ¡¡1."loc ""OCoð. ,,11_1 "i"locl ~E.o1 .~~: ëlja.; Õja.;lë 5!jl~§ 5Ij,a.;ë "- "I·!!I 01 ~i 'w E WI ~ EI ~wl 0 EI 'w ~ ,.!.. ·9 6 ~ w 0 g: 1/11 0); c, '" O~' C (/),~. en ~ ",I o~ ......: IE ~, ~I~I Ej:=, 011 UI c:.;:; 0'11:2: ~:.;:; 011 011 CI:';:;I, 0'11:2:1 - Ii) ui", 'i UI = .l:I,S L;. ;-=:.1: .s ;-=:'.1: .S' C ;-=:i~ .SI rn: "~ÆI'''I '"I'" "I !J!i,21>j:;¡, J~>,c ,,1- >1=1 "'·-1 >'. c' '!:::'....Ii).... '!:::'~_... >'I=lrnCI 0l;- ro=-=: O¡=rnëii o'=rni=-=:i 15 Ii),.!.. 2 15...- :.:;2121 = E!ICI), Ii) , = elCJ) Uli) = e U) ü' =! e¡U) 11); ... ><1 ... x' rn _ 0 1 ro _ 0 rol _ 0, rn _, 0 ' 0; m-CiLl 0;1;; §JiLl 1;;1 cl""I"'1 1;;1 CI""I:::I 1;; C ""iol 1;;' c ""I~. Ct:...!-I~:m Ct:1'~(ñlm E!8Ig~1 E8~¡~ Ei8ig!~ Ei8~i:!J ~ ~ ~ ø ci ~ N M ..... ..... ..... ..... I~-Ir ....- ----"---~'"-'--~~_._~-,_._,.- _ ~__'_"-' _"dU',_ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 '" '" ... '" T" f> ~ITI't'I'" l""~" I'" IWIT!~I'" 'tvl......~rvl::O I"'ITITI'" ,~ INI::o , :!! ~I~ ~ T1 ~~ ;::;: ro T1 CD I~I~ l:!'i~I~I!B. " CD (' ) ,ro Ii I, '" ~ ~~I~ x' ~ ::T¡Q. IX ëDl::J ã ~ Ig ~ ~l~ 0 IË !" TI~ 18:1~ ~!a ~I~'~ a Ë I~ <å ~ (I (J) 0 = C-a.::!'I C I...... a. I::!'! ~ ~1a.1~ ~ < ::J Q) - ~ ~lg ~:;:: @ tv CÐ ro a Q) I- I........, ...... '" '" I~ ~ tI) l~ al~ ~ g t~ .þ. ~I~~ ~ '" ¡g ~. = Q) , _. a. ~ _.Ia.I;::p '" '" À ~ ::J ::T = o . o "I I¡I~I~ 31? CJ"]C" 0> VI S' ~ Q) ~ , :8 'g Ig¡~ ~ " 0 '" l~ ~ =w" -5 ~ =w"'T1 I~ ãi " ,m c ~ I~ t:; " '" À !}::~ t:; OJ ::J A => " ~:E ::J " 3 !1 U)I~ ¡!!'ol; ~ -À =c- -"'m -I~ If)) <TO ~~~ 0 C Q) _~ en ~'" Q) ::¡:Icn Q),t\) (j) I~,m ..." R~j "'n => -1-< I~ j [5. i~ -I I~ ~ ,-- 0 :> ;¡:'" c 'C Ie.. :y ..... c 0 C '" ¡¡ ,,[!!'o ~ => 0 "W'" ~~ " - '" W'" ¡¡; ~ g c 0 " -. I..., ::e - ",'C m " W CD "~ .;"tü ICD _. Q) ~ - 0" :::¡ c ::t ~fd3 :<; " ~fd3 fdfg "'-3 x " c => ~ 0 '" ('þ 1::1'" ;c Ë3 I[r " " ~-< 0 o -< '" ~Ii Sll~ tn ¡11~ ~~ o CD ~ ÔCDQ:I o " " ~ x ;"" ßj"::J ~ W => " ' '" Ë 3 0. I~ a. => => 0. '" .'" <D '" g " '" " 13 Õ => 0. r 10 :> '- ii! 0 " <T" íiì en"- -gE:õ n g ::tI -. " '" - o ~ '" 0 '" - ";=c:nm =='~:~ ~ ~ :1".' -.,', (D À À i-> ~ '" w â> -::sea 0 on on ... ~ ... ... ~'.~:."oC CD CD '" ... CD À À (/)0 _ ~-;ftI "'<3 :E -. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " " ~ ~ :.. i:> i:> ~ i:> ~tQ :::J '" 00 CD ... CD À 0 ø a; en " :5. b gt, :::J Oftl '" '" (CI uf·'" '" '" ~ '" '" J:Z ~ (I); ....CCI on on on '" '" À - '< ~ ... ... '" ... ... w ... -<, .:!. olr o d: ~3 ~-~ '" '" '" ~[ '" '" '" À ~ ... ~ ~ "' '" '" ~ 0 0 0 on :>en o c. '4J".,~, Q cgo rii: rn -=<~i (D;,'<"Z AI..tr' CD iit-Al_;:~. --,~:;'-' ~. 1.2-/9 ,~~ - ~~~ ~"--,,-- "-"_.._._,._-_.._-,._._--~'_---~ ,- ,\ê u~ _caf GJ;a,:CG z",>o'Q) ..> .D..'~ .Q) g w> . ~~__ N o c'~ ~ o~ = ø~ ~ E ~ <0 ~~ ~ ~ø ~ CG'~ ~ E'ø IN ;0 ~ "0 :w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~':;¡U'I tit ~ ø~,~ ~ ~o~ ~ .. '" ~_U'l_ 0 _ c~~ q ~ ftJ-c':> 0 . Ë3~ QN "Q.) ca.:--- ;CUJ _ N ~ >.'-~'" 0 CD ~c~ N "It GJ-~ A ,,>3 ~ w ,nJ~ CD "'- - '" o " ~ u - '" ~ ...·õ o.ECI) _"Oc. _cft) '!!'"'.c .. 0 ~ -, .;;: '" .t:: C ~ :: o .. 0 .- :;, .... 'õ.U'I 1: '¡: ~ 8 en ~ ~ B ~ ~~ ~ 00 '" '" 1"1 '" E ~ I I ~ ~ b - " I .... N M ~ ~ w ~ ro m N N N N N N N N I J. . .2.t:J ..._..~_....._.__.._.__._"._."_m_._~___'___··_ '" ,.. '" N ~ it-..) ...., t:;: ;0 tv W ~o :.... "'1~1""0" I"'H'" ,0" '<"T1 "'0 - [U -I ;I> C) ......~..ro 010 :::J -"Icb!ch:!l 00 Q) CÐ :J :T g> ~!3. ~ -neb ch ¡CD ~ ~ ì' (I);;I""'Q.. ;<'110 ¡;; I" "TI'- .- ., C = '< ~ :J (t) ¡-. w _.IC'Ð 100 10 I 3 ~ -. 0 CD W :J rn~ = -¡!1. :> 0 õ':T~Õ 0 ~ - . Ii! c a. ~ ~'$l :JI~ ~ ~ ::E ~ Q = ~ ~ ~ 1 - I~ Ii:¡ I~I;:: "0 () ... (1) 0 OJ Å 10 Q) -. ;C1>õg: (') rn ~ w ~ ..., :S. -. Q) '" :> ~ '< ::J :I: :> I" = -. a. ;::J! ( -. a. ;:::Þ " ~~ (J) U 0 :: '" 00 0 (I S' ~ 1010- ' g.0":.. '" (1) 0 (I) _. ;: ~ æ.¡t:E Ie- w .þ" .. ::J:>, ;:+;¡;);cÈ m " " , a. -. m~ c Iê: fir " 1- = 'T1 :> -.'" Z :$ .. C I ' ~:> Q) W .þ. 0 »;a.m_ ~ ëD -0 "0,,- 1[1)1(11 .þ. ( ~ 0 - ::J '" -. < OJ -i Co ~I~ ~ '(I) .- 0 o c !'! õ'c = ~ S" r:r o '" en - '" m -"'m ... ii1' :> "':<1(1) "':< (I) ..... .... 33 g S'(Q CD ;;, '" > ~cO 3:'" , ¡r >< :::J -. -i 5.§j :>' 5' Ë c I:> 0 a.s-....... .. !:: .. Q) 3 (f) 0 YI C/I ~ 0- 0 i§ ~ ~ t;->I~ Q)'N N " -, '" -Q) Õ ~ 3" 3 !æ. "''' :::¡ " I'" iü ",'0 .. õ',," * iü j,. '" "T c Q': " ::J Q) 3 ,,"20 3 "''''3 "''''3 ~ 0 ~ '" . I~' g .. :> ~ ~ CD CD Q) -.... '" tv '0 I~ ~ '" '" g-ëÐ CD Q.-I(I ~ (I) ~ 3 :::::!. '<: p,,,, o CD '" '0 ICD III Q) - iÜ '" ..., Q) 5.. ~ -:> 0 =Q) (1) _. CD ~ (') 3 I~ I~ 00 0 ::J 0 ~.:5:.;a. (J) 0 3 3 (0- tðg.æ...., 3 .'" 10 '0 '0 3 :E ~ 3 1~ .'" .'" VI a. õ' ~ !~ .. ;::;:ro OJ cr:J 0 § 10 :> :>'''' 00 - ::J '< 0 3 ~ " 5'''' a.:T~3 - "'''' C) õ' (f){þ M- CD :> o a 0W"'C :J .. '" Q) < " (,):Joc. lit 0 õë: QO:J-æ.. :> c -, m c: ~ õ' ~ -::J ~ Q)(O _. OJ.....::J ;I> ~C'" :J - ñ)" ( ') <- ~ > o Q) 0(1)-..,... .. :> ::J 0 CD Q) -. 0 0 " en 0" :J < ::J ..., 0- - :::!; S' £ '< (l')Ct~ C -(0 '" a < to :J 0 "O:::J_ G') CÐ(I).....c: m e: 0 ". ::J C en' <"..., Q. g :0 m ~ ::J Q)- mã)' (00. ~ ~ :;- '< -, ~:>' 0 '" a n '" ::J (þ CD Q) -. .. (1) :J = '" :> Q)õ' en :J 0.-<" - - < ~ !:!: c: s: . ~. 5' 3 3 3 '" -i (OQ) ~g::J~ ;I> OO~ m "' - 0 CD .., CD CD en ~ Q) ::J 00..,...... >< ::J 0 OCD"OQ) C -;:. cn'm .. :J "0 Q) 2: 3 o.::J m ~.":> g: 3 .:¿- ãJ '< CD :s: s';'CÐ CD . 00 g= (') Q) CD :> Ò> ~ ·0 !::1 --::sea - '" Q) CD 0 ~ s: '" '" '" :§-~,."< 3 ca ::J 3.. " 00 C '" 0 0 '" c ,<'< "'. - en o Q, _-i:>' > -i - :>,:>,'" '" 0_ '" '" 3 ;;0 - "':>' < cne ~ ,...'" '" ::J '" - '" '" Q) -< ......I»<'CÐ 0- ""3 ~"'oo m ~"<'3 .§ -. CD ::J '" 3 '" c '" 0 0 '" ::s.'m '" Q) Q) ~~ CD '" 0 :.. '" to, ::s ,Ei ¡;¡ '" '" 0 tv <D (,0< Q, _·c "'0'0. :> Q) ~ o.Q)", CD -'" ::J 0 "' 0. :;'00 C " 0 en 5' o ii! 30 ::!. " 0 '" 0 c-g"& ~Ò'~ ~ 3.0 '" '" 0 '" ::s O-cD 00 ,,'3 ~ "'>~i~ ", CD .., -. ::J '" '" "0 ~ '" 3 o ~. CD '" ~ fR"'_ - -",,,, Q) ~ W '" -;t' . 0 Q) '" '<0'" '" 0 '" ~ 3 ::J -< .c CD _ =-. c 00. Q) - 3 C) ~ !!!. c CD en ~ Q) -0 ~ ::J a. '" - <: -' :T -. CD C) '" m 0 ;¡ Olr- e;' Q) - '" 3 a. Z ::J '" _."0 CD ~ O'=, ~ o.~ --::J .... (') ~3 - '" '" '" ::a :>' 33ca > ï;1 ~'fIa CD "':>, 4ItS' 5' Q) '" ~~'< " tj -0. '< ~ .... n :¡f'" 0-", .. c: am z :> 0-' ã: ö· ~. c - ,,::J ,,' ",- _::J::J CD . :>' Q)o(O " ¡¡;. ~o!h 3 ii! '" õ-'" tv 0 '" '" c 0 L ,. ¿ r" -. II> :> I '" , CD '" tv '" '-" 1.2"'~1 ...:.- . ...---.--.,. ---~--"_.._-_._-- -,-'-. · . - ~....... ... ,g.r! (þ';;CCU z",¡;-,~ 0.,- W ~ 0/$:;::1 ,",C'';' C .. U),Ë ;a,.~ ;!.-. ..- S';; ;0 .nO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ - N 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ e'-.'1ñ '..~ ~ ~ ~ tA- CD ,OC CO'" w> .. UI ~:~ g ~ 8 ~ ~ 8 ¡,:~ §' c:î""; ci d ci Ó E~.~ ....- e-en _ 001 ~ ~ NON >,'0·... ..... CO CD ex;) to N ~~,,'~ N..... ~ M ~ ~=~ ri ~ ">3: .!ita,:.;: "'- - '" o III ~ ... - '" ~ ...·ü o..e CD _ '" Co _CUI ~œJ:l .. 0 !! .., « ~ "'II ~I ..... c...., o ro O! (J) tf) VI 11I'1 ~ c c E.. '" E OJ '" c '" ~ 0 ro~ ~ CO c: E tf) OJ c: Q.JI t- -'.. !!! Cot- :,-, ~ C.. U - '" ~ E N ~'" 0 o ¡;:, ell ._; VJ ,. ro ::J :J "E C"}I::J,::J ;:; ::I r- .... WI c: 11.i Q.J = 0 U Q) ~ u.. 0 0 ê c.. en - _ .... 0 ... .... N rol U 0 ::J U' N ! U 0 Q.J ~cu 0 C ::Jb::J ::J~~ 00 U (f) N 0° (fJ u CD ~ :)' X 0 ..... X ... 0 c 0 IV ,.... C en :æ.A' ..... I;:: ~ ~ ioi:l"§ _I -C ::J _ 0 "C r- -£ "C ::J ....; 01 ...... ..... Q) C Q.J C c: C/) -- Q) c: ·-1 CD "'" (f),.... en tf) E E Q) c::: "C ro ..... w ;: ..... ë Q)' a::: C, CO I ~!~! ~I;,I ".I'.n ,,;,,1 ',""¡ I >¡!!!I'" > !S -.;1 ~ ~w¡ 51 > 01 'Iii!'" E¡ 0> W "'I. >, co Q) :> I;:: C en ~ :> W N; .01 0> ~ III - o¡ I- .... 0 a. "01 c ~ m.è. o...J . .0' 0 c:.;:¡:J 0' N "C 0 co' C - .c. c: N¡ cn ¢:' 1:) -- ._I.c. c I -;;IM æ :ßI ~ ~I~I:ß ~ -=:;: £ N'~ ~I v1ro 5¡:ß ~I= '>I'~ o It ....:; 01_ OJ:; _ Õ ~ ã3 ~,~: ~' æ= -g Ð: :; _ õt ~ ~l ~:;; ~ 1111 !!!¡~I"\jII11 :sl~c "" Ü~~ gl:;; ~I¡¡:I gl,J'J ÆI111 :s1;:"""lüi Q),.....-LL ~_c;:::LL en 0 Q)..... Q1I Q) en<pLLI enl-'°:::::-i a::i:;:iE..-- a::¡':;:~t-- .E8~"- a::1·:;:·iñl~! a::1..!-1..--1(D .E18~~ ~ ~ ~ ø ci ~ N M - ~ - - /J-,) 2- .__.._.._-_...._._-_.,,---"--~---~-_.._"'_.- -..-.--_..- .-. '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IWI~ ~ ~ !D ?' '" '" ?' '" 'tv!i» ~ 1::U I 'N:WIO 3- I;;;I¡¡¡- :EI;" I'"IT T ;" I..., 13 '" <1> " <I> th (0 !(J)¡~ig ~ 13 ;::+ ~ ::!!I~ ~ !! ,[", "Iq" _,1_ -- ~ro ~ a Ä. ,(1) OJ a CD 0_ tù .:i¡<Ð tù a ' I ~ 0 ~ en:Q. = .1:: I , ::tI C ¡a. 5.. :::!I IÄ.I' "':::!I it: ~ 5. :::!I ,¡:¡¡ ,tn tv""" ro¡a " :;;: o Q) I_:E Ie or - - ro ò IU ;; 'VI iO CD ..... , ~. ~ êb .... 'nJ w..... '" " ' :~Ia.I~ ~ '" " , !êP ~ ~ -. c.. ~ _" c. ~ :E 01'" o a' UI :; 3 I:¡: 0 ~ g.CT~ LO::;: o-ltl) ..... ê:IQf " m g ~. 3 ~ tù ~, ? 13 S' "'I~I~ =(ü" Q)'(f) J:>,. "- 5' g: ~!~ " 0 '" - 0 " o C o " - ~ m ~'~ia. Q. 0 - ~ 1m _ " " ..." ","- §~ » » '-Ie 0 " » tù -. en ;C'" '" 5.:):., e <1> - C ,c !"~ e "- C <1> n o '" T'" C 0 0 <1> C Q)~¡;:) " ::I. ro £ ,0 e '" ~~ ::¡ ::¡ :§ Q) ro £ ::¡ ro ..., - ",'C '" " '" w<» c ::: o - o " '" ~3 ' 0 <1> - '" " <1> - <1> <1> ::I ::I " "'" ro' 0 ,. ¡¡¡- Q. "'''' -3 """, I 5)à. 3 Q (¡ï~ <1> õtJ 3 ::I 3 c. I~ '" I~ Q '" 1"- õ > '- ñ1 o " C"~Ciì en::l- -g E: S' o g ::c - <1> '" - n , '" 0 '" - -;?'( ),m ~ <»::1 '" ~C'Ø '" ¡;: '-' '" o<".cà. .a 0 '" '" '" ...::!.;, cn..'< .... w .... '" 0 cnc _IILftI ~ <"3 0 0 0 - 0 :IE:;-.. '" '" '" '" c... __CCI ::J '" <J) 0 '" '" ø>'Q, en " m So 0 ::J ::J:O>CD '" '" <C, (þ'" '" '" '" - U)......cc '" - '" '" 0 ...;..:: .. ,'< <J) '" .... '" '" ... «' ~ -,-' m· 00. 0: 0': ~3 -a, .!!-Cþ: Q. S'en g C ".:S' " d:iO ~¡:n ';';;;';>'''Q,... -< 1»-:-" (D·'<Z- fU-:~-CD ¡;r 01- -~ "',,' ).).·.23 ~ --~-- .- ------......-- ~-, ~~ ~ ~'~~ N 'G~~ . Z ;~CÞ "'It ..> c..- ':;12) 0 W» C! ~=- ~ ~C~ _ e" ' ~ "'~u _ c _ - .,. ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ø- .. E - en o ~ ;0 ~ 00 ·w ~ >0 !:!. ~ PI ~ ~ m:: &() m-0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ &() :;:::~,_~ ~ 10'7 "!. c 0'- ~ w:·:·:-> ~ ·.-:ø ,'" 'C ,':fiI 01 01 C'\ I co ("') 0 _ C~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 Ë'~'~ °1 O[ ci 0 ci 0 ~ ø'œ- _ C(fJ - ~ ~ M M N M _. ~~'~ 0 ~ NOM M ~~ Ow,» M ~ ~ M ~ _ ... :c -. - - co CÞ ,-oC..- ...- .. c~ ~ w~~ M - '" o 0 ~ u 4í t¡: D:: ... 'ü 0..2·41 _'Co. _c'" ~co.c .. 0 f! ..., < B B ~ ~ ~ ~ æ E g g U) ~ c c co Q) Q) E"OI- l/) U) 121 c ~ ~ u~ U ~co ro~o E c: Q) en c: Q) t/ æ I- VI ~ Õ! 12 ë QJ :s f! "'~'.~ is "'~ g.: is 0 :: ~"' ~I ë' 1j £; , ;:¡ ::I ::) 0 U) ::J 01 (f 01 co .~ QJ Q); U) 0 VI C. en U u c u U C, E LL. - =- L... 01 <1J ~ '" o¡: ftS g 0 Q.J g 0 Q). co N N _ (01 :ß 0 ë ~ CÞ C 00 c: 00 - ",,-1/)"0' ~ Orn ~~ "C::J·u"C::J·u N£ 1-.!2·c ~~ u ~'õ ~¡¡;;;g ~1¡¡I;;;g >=.3'._, ~1·2JI~1 ¡jlgl. B~ ÕjcLcr ÕicLcr ~1n,~1 ~ërJl .EQ.J-c, ~~1 ~ Ojui ~~ ~ ~ui ~I 'T .êl'iii' 'T Æi'iiil :;;; §¡'§:I <1JE -~ '" C en - c U) ~ N ro ..c M U ..c 0 01 ;c ._ Q) '- c~ ~ c~ ~ ·..co .Eo 0 _~ Q) '" "' £ '" "' .~ ~ "' 1?1¡t "'I ~IE "II:;;; 1? '" ;;¡ - .~ Q. :.= > .E Q. :.= ~I.c N CUI 01 ( ) 'It ~ 0 ~ ..... co ro 4)' 's.E I- o ro - U C'al= .... '0 ........ .... ....... .... N .c... .è: ..J :s :~~ ~ 3 :s ~I~I~Q; ~ ~I~·I·BI· ~I ~~ ~IB ~I~ ~IE' .BI :s oS ~I ¡:': "'I 8 0 - "'lot- ( ) (I) cp lL (1) Q) 0/' u. Q)..... ~ Ii.. VJ.s=. I- 0 E M ~ E 01 <D M e:::...!-,........ a:::...!- ,....1..... a::: "§'I ~I N¡ .E ~ OJ f- N M ~ ~ ø ~ ~ m N N N N N N N N ))-.Jf -.-.--+--.---..- '" '" w '" ~ ~...... Q) t...... 1:U I...... (lJi.....l~ 'm ~ '- ~1"""iTI:u I~I~'~I;" '<"TI -g (¡) ~ ~ > C) ,0 5.'rb,~ '0:) "(1) i~ roi::) CO I I, !ft) 00 :T1 a.!~ I, I:) ~ I <b fD,!:2. 1<> <>- '< ~ :J CD ~ ~ 1::!11......:~ '0 '" '" I:!'!!ro'~ 1(3 "T'I'(ii:J i.., . C= ,-' ......'m :0 ';JJ ¡Q ¡~ -. 'm:O . 3 ~ _...c_ > 0 ~ cbhi~ ,x ,I..., I~ ',- ~I¡¡ ~ I'" I~ IQ.:.., l=t Q::r!.Q. c <O- 'E: I'b '(Q ;::::¡. I~ c: ..., 'lQ ...... c: ¡...., (Q I...... '"( () .... ¡.., ro¡<IÅ '(ù ~~ IÅ ë'o .~ 10 '< I'" !@¡g;< IN iõ 0> -, .:.CDoÕ () <> n <> <> ~, '< " :I: UI,ql3ìl::t' I'" q-I~ '" () ~. (II --,CD .4- 'In ,_, ft) ;::to '" ",10 (/)"'0 0 :E '" '" '0 - ig.:~ ~ ,g.:3ìI~ '" ;: ~ I 0,(') tv Din N '''' I::) '3' <> "5' CD 0 U'I _, ¡; I '~"¡:¡ïl-t, ~ i-I' I~ ,q~ '", -·1' '[u 0'11 ~ "- -. :=<'ro;cÈ m -',ct) ""T1 ;£ 13 - ,(1) T1 '~~ I~ _,OJ> Z :;: ,0 j::::J 'bo (') i:J bo. IWI~iA 0 þ~ß).... 0"1- 0 o-I.......~o '" (JI ¡....'a - " OJ> -. < ß) -i ",. < k5,g (J) I '0 <> OC = ~ 5" 0" l~cr,1T1 W cr'm 1-· I;; glj i; glj o 0 .. ~ Õ ' D) :w(IJ '=IQ) ¡en ,~ I:TI::J ...<> ~ 3 n -"(0 ro ~!o;l-" Bi I=I-i <0 ~'!ro I:) '~:t\) 1::J'o;'J\J S:'" -i 33 , '" ::r C " fJ) '", - -,!}: ...... Ie ~ 'a. a. '" e ;0. (II 'e <> !:¡ <> ~O> VI o. (/) :n I-'~ 1_1/'0 <0, IQ) í-'(J) tu 1- CJ') '" -. '" õ ~ 3' ~ ;;¡ '" ,£ I~·~ ,- liD ,§.Iñ) ",,, <> õ''2 ::E !t\) ~ - :~ i~ 1(1)1;:::0;,1» c: 0:. 3 ~"2.3 I~~ I"I~ ¡;:!¡ ¡::r,3 l::!Ii:T13 ~ 0 ~ " 0> en or" '", <> ~ ~ g-ñ> ~ C1> C1> CI) lit ,CD 1\.):-0 ~ J\J ,-0 '" I~:'" 1\.)'11I i! ¡D. ,¡III -I' I~ U) à. 3 ~. g. ~!ª l-n 100 10 "T 00 o " '" ;;¡ 0> _ 0) _. CD ~ ,~ 5. -. 01:;) -'1°':;) " =:0) " 'N'a. ~ a. ~!a. 0 " 0 ~. ~. =- U) '-i l-i -.J 3 10- ::J a. CI) .., '", ,'" ,n -i ,-i 3 :¡~ (Q C1> =-: C1> '- ,g I~ '" U) a. 0 0 '" ¡u ,- '" ;::;:CD ¡g '" ~ CI) CT :J 0 .3 '3 13 :3 ~ :::rCl) :J '< 0 3 I ," "0 i~ a. gur ¡'" I'" l'1 i~ u '" D..gg3 ¡" '.'" '" CD'tJ I I 0 o a cn( )~__CD ~ o CI) "'C :J '" 0> < G>:JOc. 0 õä: Qo:]--~ i~;~:6: Is: ':!!¡~I6: 1~I~iQ'~ IS:'O'."I- ~ C -. C ('þ -. 1 1_.1--1-' ~ -" ~[l)~g ;~ ~ 1::1 '" ro'" 13 ICD CDI~ ~ 100 ,UI i¡:þ Q ~IO ~ :J to) I I:ï > õ' C" ::J - ãr U) "," '"( -, 14'1S: i!!: C) '" I'" 'C) ,-. > oen__ I~ 12, r- ib i~· ¡'g I~ 12: ~ '- ~ ~ " 0> CD tu -. 0 ,CD i~ ¡CD ~ 10) 0 0 ~ 00 ::] < :J .., < I' 0 < i~ 1< UI·:3 3 3 c.ni~IO C"rI)ûì en -cE =-: S- £ '< !~ ê: n <> Iª'I[ I~ g 0 '" 2- I=: <> <> 01- en~- G) CD a (ß ~ a. g <> :3 < I =" 1--0 õ' ,0 .- ,..... n -ge:ô c.n1_.¡:::!iICD a I» " C ,g 1:3 ~ I~ f"" I >0 or ~ " U). <-.., 0 0 nO" m CI)-ICD5)' ¡:i 3 I~ 0>(13 !!: ~¡~¡~~ 5'" tÞ :; lOa. ~:::r 0 Õ~I:" . - - '< -. CD CD tu _. ,n I~ - ~I~r n ~ n OJ> " jŒ '" 0 <> CD :J =: I:; ¡:r "" ;¡, 0>0 CII :J c.-< - < ~ ~_ C g' ,n <> ~. oï 3 I~.b 3 3 CD -i I.þ.::- 10 0> ~g:J:::r - > en =-: m co - 0 CD .., CD CD en ~ 0> " en..,____ >< 10> 10> lto " 0 o CD "'C tu c: -;¡::"'m <> "-" ::J 'U tu 2: ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ 3 -< ñ> '< CD S m <> . (/) g =: (") '" :r -. tÞ ~ '" " I~ -<c5r3 - CD 0> CD 0 ~ S ~ " =-,,(/) 1&1 I~ '" lto .::!. tI) ,'<, 3 10,< c: to I'" c '<0 fJ)' - '" _-i:::r > -i - 0_ :::r:::rCD 0_ "" "' :::r CD CD 3 ;C - 10 10 eno ¡¡¡ """CD CD " CD < - ~3 fJ) CD 0> -< _mft) 0- =-:--U) m ;¡~3 <> " CD 3'tJ C 0 - 0 ::I.. m '" 0> 0> 0> 0> ~ I:... Ii 0 '" YfC :::s cã' 1': fJ) _'< CD I'" 0 lco -.J "' Q, _·c CDC-a. ~ Q!..(þ a. 0> CD <> " 0 fJ) Q, S-(/) C '" 0 I~ I~ L en :;' o ¡¡¡ 3 0 :J. .. 0 CD n O'"g~ S.o~ a ¡¡'o CD fJ) 0 :s 0 tÞ;- '" :;::'3 .., --:J cg ~'a: ~ CD 3 o ~. ~ ~ I:::¡ 'to - -fJ)CD !~ I~ '" I", <;¡ '< 0 '" CD '< 0 fJ) '" I'" 3 " I -<' .c 0"- CD_=-: c 0>-3 () .;:!. !!. C CD Ü;~9t --0 " "- ~ -. s: -- (1) () '" fJ) :¡J 01;\' ... 0> [!! '" 3 "- 0 0 __ 'U CD Z ~ " fJ) ~ 0'" ,,-CD --" -i - '" '" CD () ~3 or 'tJ :¡ 33fÒ " ;;: '" > -;;~ 0> :::r :E~'< 0 -'" :;' '< CD -i t> Q, n gñ> 0-fJ) '" C~CI) Z ;¡, 0-' ~ õ' S. 0 "," ;¡. fJ)- -" " <> . :::r 0>010 .. ëiï @ O.CII :;en 3 ~ fJ) CD Õ .-- 0 'tJ 0 go c 0 9' "~G) " ;:¡, <- ego r" - '" 1i m . -.J " . '" "' '" '" '" ......;."'tJ (þ<-~-z IU a'tþ ~ ~... -~ ,. /.2-.lf ., '--" - "- _ _ __.______~.__m__.__.__._..__.._ ,--:-"'-, .'-~- ! :~ u~ - .. Q) .c .m Z ~~ n,- w ~ oð''' 0"'" c .. cn,Ë 'C ..- -'" ..- E1ii :;: 0 ,nO 'C ~ '" '" r-- " ,,' ¡;sl r-- '" >- - M r-- .. '" ",' M tn -'(/) .. ;; .. ;;¡ "'I ;; ~ '" 00 .. 0 " CO·- W > .. "' 'C '" ~I " 0 r-- 01 01 r-- C:;I:I) _ M 0 0 «I '" .." :;: 01 0:; 0:; 0:; 0:; 01 0:; E .- >,;< .. ..- 0", >,(/) -í:' r-- M ;:: r-- 00' '" CD " '" M "I M r-- 0000>- M r--. '" "" 00 M. ~ ,,- ~ ':1 ~ CI) .- .&; " > :;: W~::::. ~ 'C " ro E .I EI J ¡;: E 0 o u! <=, 0 '" ~ :ÆI ro: ~ u - '" "" &: '- 'õ ~--'- r¡) u (I)¡ .~: o.E GJ -~ B æ· I.: <:' CI -~ _'Co. E- 0'- .... B¡ _I.Q; -,,", =, ~I" IE' o ro m,d.!- 1 "1- .!!,.I"IIJ:I o i!' -v¡icn' 5 01 (I), C ~~i .. 0 ~ ro E 'i EI~ i!' ..., " " " ~I (ijiQjlu m .- Q), Q) ~~I ~I '_ - C .c c).... < E rol ~I rJ ~ :51 u ro,Q.. ~; êl Q)I cl Q) o ~ ,§:, ,!QI IE EI ~ ro ~ m; 0 _ ro ", ,- ::;;,,_1 ",(9 0, "" 1.1...1010 I- 1.1... ,1.1..., :<:10: J .;1 ..I ~ J .I '" 0 0. 0. '" '" E E' EI 1:' 0, E: ~I " :<'1 ro !'J ro '" -, -I '" 00 00 00, ", 1-' I- 1-1 u. ~ , ''I'" .,,:;j §j e, "tJ ~I eM -g1~1 ro gl e IL ~ 0. I: 0 ~ roIL ro , 0 (\JIll¡ ~I<= ~ rolll¡i .81 "''' IJ)NÕ ~:~I " ro, 0. ~'N' U, g i!' ~É E€~ I: " " 0: E,,,,, " " 0' -0, -0, T'~I .- ~ !'Ji ~I ~ ::: ~ !'J¡ ~; " '" "" ", "I '" ~ .~. ~¡ c.", (I); Q) .B, "', 0, '" ",2 '" ~ =>, .- .. ~I~I~ ro N -, "0' 0 § =>, ." (Q _! (\J, ~ .. ~"'." --I rJ, ~ el ~ '" ",I => '" ~::;; ~, ggi~¡ ~ ~I~I I- -'(I) "', '" 1::i Nlgg:-g1 -, ro' ro,e¡:: 0> 0> ..~ W ro~- (1),2·=1 "113 ro 1:' ~, EI ~12'~1 co ~I 1m: .S' rn ._, 0' o ..Qí21 =:Im > >, 0_(1)1 'VI ë¡.oj 3:'0. ro E' . ~, 01~1 (I) 'V E u ~ ~ ª¡ ~I ~.~ Ll. CI~' lI¡ ~;'c IL ..~, I 1 N' Ei~, aJ ,S'I ê;-'2 N '~!2 I ' ._ ro NI~ 5' 1rJ¡ 8:X¡ .~I :!:I " ¡¡¡I~i , ~ - Q'i " lei e ro '" ¿ :.þ! 1?1S:!~: ~ 0> 0 -:0) 0, .¿11E1~' '" "113 '" " '_I <= =1 M 'Q).-, =1 " ,,'" 'V >J Õ, ID' C1J¡ UI (I) - 'e, (I) j ü¡~1 11.11 C'C/) ~- " :: ~~!~: Q)'~IQ)I ~, '-,0 ~I ~ e· ~ ~ .... cp:J oE ~ ~I:;I ro ~I ro ~. ""~'~I ~ u, I .....'::J ,- a:::: =!ë¡ 1§iQ):ü .a e (1)1-- )( o Q) ~Ixl o ( ) ..... ~ ~I"'" c.:x = I: :::1 ~I C¡ 1)'.~ I ro 0 ro 0 .b!~' ,*'iÎ: ..... C "0 .- .þl c._!._¡ ß-,~: Ei G:: iií U1 0.:' - " d.! Q) C 1.1... ~I '\', '\'IIL, 41' ~I cI1.1...1 w~ ~, 01 , <111 '1" ' a:::[N, m N, a: 1.....1 (\J,....., 0::::1 :::,~,N, I: 0 ,w, O::::.....,.....,lf) N,__ "<t¡ - -, -:........, <Ò ,.: '" .,; ci ~ ,.¡ M ~ ~ ~ ~ I).·.J ~ . _...._"...._---,._-_._".._..----_._---~_..._-- '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <> <D '" .... ?' '" ... .::.1..:..... ::t1 I......!(:I)'.......;:.:, '... 1- :.... ;2) '-1'-- 'CD ....... J'0:::':' ;m,~ ;7":~ ;r-n ;õi~ ¡f'V'!!?I::: i::u 10)15. 'cb :~ 0 '0 => 1° ,~ I", cb I rb (1 ,.." ro ,rb ~ '0 '" I" (Q I;::o."jro !~ ,~ 18 Inr 1-'1-;::) I~ I::!'! D..:~ .- I" () :- ,x'¡:J :::::r :; X (þ!:) .... "1 I:J " ,0 'Oa) ,0 '~I~:ro ,0 ,~I...... (þ:0 o It\) Ë !ll~ ~ -. .......:ro 0 I=> = I=>= ';0 ',"1= 1_ ~...... 0 I~ I ...., I~ C/) -, C/) ~IQ) c: I"""''''' I~ ~ Icb..a I~ I~ I~ ::i: ~ ~ ,..., ..., to .- 'crtlllQ 1- '" ~ '" '" 1-, ...,I(Q ...... la IQ) ro 0 ~ .þ. Ira !¡¡-¡< Å 1< 0' ::5. ,Q. Ie) 'Œ g ¡< I.þ,. ¡}: '<'Dì< IÅ 'Œ !~ ~ (/) 2.'(þ ~ '(I) '$lI(D ~ '=> I;: 1i ,=> I=!(þ -.I'D I;::t' ° 'a> ;::t w 1;:1i 1 ~ o 13; . 13 ~I' "' IIQ;= "' ~I;;.: ;g.I~IJ,. ,§ï3; I' i~ to ,_. ;ï U'I 'eT '0 N '" 1;r:3' '" l;:rl~ [31:;: ß) 1_. , I:J IQ'I~ 'e 'e I......I::J W --I' I:J ,Ü'It;-' 1° =,~ " 1-' to 1::i" lO :Qf'~ !~ ,c)i~ I~ 15'~ ¡O"Ig: I~ '" =>, '" ,C/) Irol:5" (:1)1..... .l:>. ,gl-:a '" lip ;3 '''' ';C i3 (,/)1.....'0 0-1-0 '", ~ [3 'x ,n ~'cr ~ 'D. 0 'D. '0 .....,c;r,m I~,g{~ '< 10 ~I~ o 0 I»,~'(!) I=igl~ e 'e ,I» ,~:(/) Is ,e ""'" :J 'ã)'I- I~ 1=1-1 I=> ia ,::) '-'-1 (/)1=1-1 "' I'" ;:'" ;~ '''' a. ,VI !.... ._;~ ....... :3- Io.,~ !...... - '" ,~ 'e ,'" Ii:: '" ~ O.1I-'N I-,~ '" - '" ¡!!t¡f'.J ID. " -. ro ,§.Iã) '0 10 Ie¡; :~ 15) I", ,0 I~ ",'0 ~ ,'" ,0 :g ~ ¡¡¡- '''' :g c: 0: "'15'13 Iso 13 '0 !ffi':;;;;'Oj3 ,;:;'0!3 'D. ;¡ g ¡¡ ,..:~ !t\.)!~ e Ie I '::7-0 1::7~ Ie " 1! o IJ'VVI ~ ,'" 1J'V1VI 13 o "lrI) l-n !rI) '" õl,lrI) ,,! rI) I=> !~ :0 ..... I~!J IV':Ii:J 0 ~ .....:~I5. wl:J 1-< D. ",'D. ~ ""D. ì:; col -< '''' '" j::j H 1- co '" I~ co lco '", ,- I=> '- i~ '" '", '" '" '3 '" '" 13 0 Ig ,3 .3 ¡g ìl :-g I~ "0 -a I '" ¡'" I' 0 ;ole;) ;:01(;) I", I~ If 0 "'r "'ì' õ !3 f> 3 P .3 =r j§ > '", ~§ <3 '" " ;¡ ,~ 0 "' ~ '- ,'" I!' 3 I~ o " ,'" 0 ig C"1»'Vì ,- :0 "',,- :.;=, ~ '3 3 -g e: C) n =: ;:a -. '" '" - o ~ '" 0 ;$ lco I~ I.w ';?tnm :E"" ~ ~ ::r S.I'D 'co to> '" ~ ... -:::::Ic3 I'" ~ ~-'< Iw lco '" ... '0 '" '" "' I~ i'" ~ ,'" I~ co ~ ~ , 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 "'0 -,,'" ,.. < 3 :;: -. 0 " " I' I' 18 18 '" I, 18 I§¡ -"' " ,~ ,'" '" ¡g '" D. ,~ I'" 1 I~ I~ '" " m S.O:::::l " 0 <> ~ ~ "' .. ~ ~ I~ ~ w ~ ~ I~ .. -'" co ~ w ... '" ~ - 0 '< Iw co I'" ... '" I'" '" .. -< ~ m 0", o 0: ~ 3 -" ..- -<> co. :i", " 0 ..gG) =PD ~ m -" ~~ Z " 0- <> ii1 " - -~ /.2..;. ') , .'-.-.. _"0--_"._'- .'0. . _0__.__'___0.___,___ _o_~__,o__.~_~_,________~___,,_ ~. .:.::~: ~ ~ f ""''' z i;'~ .n. - uJ !;! oði.. CI e ~ " .. Cf.I,Ë ." ..- -" ..- E1ií ;;0 .!Ju '-¡:- >- ;¡. col CO «>1 vi C\I v ......1 ",I >- - N EA- C\I V co CD ....._ 'l:tl C> -'" N EAo t;7 to') ..... ER-' '" ... en C) ~ 6'7 t.') .. 0 e eu- w > .. f/ "C en 0 Moen 01 ..... v 01 .~.~~:; ~ 6 ~ ~I d ci ~ ....- Cf/ (01 co CD! wi (')1 <D 0')1 (()I >. III í:' 0:)1 ...... wi MI N v <0 Nil .... tn >. N, "'I' V CO <.D ..... V ~. .5 :c Ñ .: "'-I' e> ;;: w~:.. ~ J I o .. .þ ~ I ~ ",'õ E . 0.. 0 o - c. 01 ." ~ <0 ::::. -g U) WI ~ ctI ctI m ~ C'II.c ~I E E ;: ~ ~ ~I C'II 0 g 0 0 all co ro f ..., -', 1"1 1"1 E ",I '" ",I < -~I g¡1 ~! E ~ ~I "'~ ~I Q) 0 01 01 C co ro ctI ~ ..31 .3! I 0' {!!. e>1 (? CJ¡ J 1i! J II J J ~I d ~ g! E¡~, EI g! g EI ~ 531 ~I 531 !!! 531 531 ~, CO .., ~I"" '" .. t ~ :s f- ~I "ON ~ "C,~I ~ "CNt)' "C~ U ""'I UI "''''I~ U,' U ","''''I r:::l~l..... " "'ILL. C roLL ° r::: c ro'LI...¡¡:: ('CI'iO ~ If) N ~i III! ~ õ ~ ~ . (1)1 N ~I (/) N, tr c~ ::II Co ::JI 0.,4)1::1, ::IC ~.t= Q..L:.Q) o ... u E £ UI E .c,I;:, U¡ u :,¡::; E ... ro E .~ c¡:: ;:¡ :s ui -g¡ roll'~1 u, ~ rol·š: ~I o¡ áJl U ~ ~. "'!~I -c! \'\]1 ~ I1J Q. en 0 f/) - 01 (/) -¡:> rnl 0 VI 0 '-1 VI -I c, -I (II' '-¡ "¡: ctI "01 :JI N t1 "C :J N......' I "'01 :J' U = :J N (¡j ro, N +-' I'IJ ~ ~ È: ~ ~1ªIVî' È; ~ ~i~ -g, È: ~ ~lg'l ~ ~1:ê;t)1 ¡::I~-g: ~ ~ ::II CI en, ('IJ ª~ :I', I"', cn.(ij ro, :JI CI':J e el U), ro:ª, U),(ij CI'J COO: .S: ~,JJ CI'J' 0 'S:' ~,c (¡í OJ 'S: 0' 81 'S:: ~iLlI CI'J ~:JJ,v;' EI~ ~I 'V:ëJJu, Elm~. '<t,'ë'~ Elm~! Elol ü5 'V~ëIJJ, 'V1~ë CI'J O>~ 1 u. (1)',_' (1 oc' ,LLV ro rn_cl 1 011-1 ,u.IIlJ"!:! lL. v:::: :§I':ê tF-1 N·'QI'õl .S¡:EI i~ NI'Q'c,o :§1:Ëi ~ :§I~i ;#1 N'Q1õl I ~I'Q~ .- ,- llì 'I!£: ,bl ='.Q'J Illì, .I!£:,!:! ·-I.QJ< 'V, '-I U' 'V' ·1!£:1,b I .I!£: U Q)¡ - '<t ~ (1) U; U) ev, -I 'VI ':::i (1), Co U) (1) -I llì Q)¡ o! 1.01 ~ ( )I U (II ':::1 ev, 'c U) (J¡õ ' '<tJÆaJ UIÕ 'I '<t~elaJ UI"O, 'I ÜI_I 'I 'V1>lÆ,ev' '<t1>':OaJ CI'J ..... _ m !..... ro.....' -.:' .......' (j)......... ro.....1 ~ ro 0 ~' .... en .....1 .... Cf) .... .... -11:1 . ~ ~I"II" -'1: I,' ~,~'U" -11:1 'I _1-"1 " ~I~,"II'" ~,~ ü" ro, 01 ~ el (1)" ..... x ro 0 ~. e. ev",Æ,x rolO¡ a::. (ij 0..1 "'I 1"1 "',,¡..... x' e, ~ Q) x .......' U " .......' "'C.- ....... U "I .... Q)'- ...... U' " """",..c ^ .... "'C .-' ....... ~ - .- U)I ...... ev'Q)cILL C/),......, Q)Q)'IlL. (1'1 .....¡ (II......., ..... ev'Q)CLLI 0<1J<1JlL. £:£, WI O:::j"'!"lro¡N CO !w O:::"'!";~IN £1.9, W E!'§! u.i o::l"'!"lro,M~ 0::'01 "'!",f'-- N M ..¡ I,l'j ø r-...: c;¿ c) N N N N N N N N IJ.-;'Ý ---~--,",~~-- -,,--_.._,--- - ------.----.--.----- ..--- w w w w w w w w :-' ~ !" f>- !" t'> ~ ~ -< 1 l I i 'm :3" I~ !õl3- I""~ 1~1'" 0 , i I'" ~ 113'ó't :!1lii "' ~ - i ¡; '" x I=>' > I~ ¡== ,'" I~¡= 1_ -"iI'Þ 0 r '~ I':' i~l~ I~ lib ~ ~ 1_, 1m lëÐr .þ. i~ ,ó't I~ -, - IQ. (þ ;::::;- 1",- '" ' 10 .fr ~ I", '" " ,;;, 13 ~'I@ I~ 1-· I ,<1> ,V> ~Ia. lõi~ ~ " " ~ i~ ' I~ '8"1- 0 '< '- oC ¡3' ,0 Is' I!;', !=Ig rn -<1> '" '" '3: 1= -i ;:'" I~ n I~ I~ ,0 ,_ ,0) .... <1> !:: ¡c ,=> IC ó't", .. -. '- ,~ ¡~ ,~ n :;: ,il) ",,,, I ¡f1 !~ I~ I:: :::. 'p. "'13 , 0 <õ' "", <1> " 13: ",I~ c -n w 15" I'§ '!' w=> I~"- ~ I"" ,~ " I I I~ 13 I~ '0 '''' I 1(;) ~ iQ; Ia; » '" I~ c.. ;;¡ 0 ~ " ," C"~Vì f r en"- '" ,,-- ,0 <1> _0 "" "" £!.~::c ~ œ. " , '" 0 ~ -;¡:cnm '" :E~::] '" ,,_<1> ë,., -"a .... '" .... 0 ~~'< <D ... .... 0 10 enc _mrtl "'"<3 en :iE-' 0 0 " .. '" " " 18 -u::!::] '" 0 0 "'''- en ~'-m "" -·o::s '" :::I O_rtI ë,., "'"" .. .. cø .... co '" .. ~ ~ - '< ~ '" CD 0 ... -< ~~ ott' o=:. "" ~3 <D -" ...- -.. -" en "- .... "" :;en '" " c ëo ~g(j) .... ~'" en :¡m W '" "^"'tI r;<~ Z ~ .. tT <1> iD ~QII'" ex> -~ . " I,). --21 ., ~.. ----~_-.- -~~-,.. -... ---.--.--'. -.----- .~.,- ...-.-------~---~--_. ."---..-.-..-."-..,,.- -..- ---_.- I I (/' i , -~, .-,. >~:~ ;~:J~]~ G.I:.g::n:I >~,>i;':~ .:n. :......... '" '" en co W'~ , '" . c: .... . '" t 'oð; ...., ë o c.... M 0 " 0" 0 . 0 0. 0 cnš ¡¡¡- ~ E - 0 Q) (I) '" ~u-æ .<: . " c: c:- _(I) > Ó 'S: .Q :2 .S -D .. c: Z ",-" Q) '" " I- cn'so ~.c u 'C fiJ >- c: ;: Q)>- .E 111-- <> ....... ~ ~~E .<:'" " ca::- ¡..; ;: 0. .:: E1i: <> I- Q) Q) Q) Q)'C - .. 0 '<t c:__ ~ Z Q) a.'- (I) c: ,g (fLY g: 0 'CEQ) -'" ë: <> ( ) .- :5 W(I) ~ rn Q.) II) '1:' 0 'C " '¡¡j <> E:= ro Q) 0 " '<:' ~õ ~ 2!E C' ~ 0 '" ... en co ..,. Q) '" .9 >- - .. ~ '" '" '" Q)(I)- E Q) 0> - I/) en '" ~ û.î 0 ~ ~.0 C) '" C ._ "- E.;:' " G.lO C o (I) Q) '" co .- +:::g.o 0- ~ W' > " c: 0 .. .g- u E Q) Q) .E I/) ~ " """ " (/J.E '" (I) " c: Q)",'C Q)- " ~ '" c: '" ... .... "I co 'C.cQ) ".- 0> "C:II) Q) >-- (I) " .¡¡; Ctn~ 0 - 0 - 0 ~ '" '" '" c: CIS .C;: 0 0 M 0 0 W " 0. E Q) '" " E">:.:.::. ~ ~ID~ Eæ .c Q.I'-C'O - > - 01/) Q) c: Q) Q)..; I!! E Q) Q) .<: (I) - -0 "' l- e:( Q)'<:'<: -" - .<:1-- 0>- I/) _, :J " CD ... en "I ::æ: - . (I) >-0> E ,:>":'fi)".:~ - "I co "'I en ~"ðë c: ~ tnC)·:>' ~ '" - ... () '" Q) - ::æ: .~ ro m c: t·E ~ - .c . E c: " c:>3: - W Q) >- ~ ~ Q) :J C:'C E W~~ - co a. c: " >< ..a a. ( ,) 0 o c: I!! en S.....'-cn c: '" W Q) CD '- Q) 0 C> ..c C Q) -- :¡:;u) < J-Q)..cro "'0> " .<: E E E£ > ...... :J:';::; ~ > .. - >'"C c: (/J ,g '" c: "' ~ C Q) c: (I) " 0 I/) TIm~Q) u ~ u .- >- .E 'S t;: co Q) I- L.. 'Co> ex: Õ ·ü - > '" c: ~ W '-.- . (I) " Q) oð .s :c 8- :;,.....rJ)( ) o c: C) oCt»> ~ Q) _C:I/) >.Q)c::¡:; 0>_ 0 ~tu.c '- g ';; c TIO I/) '" 0 o .- m (l.J '" c: c: " -. '*'"-ooU < ~ en.~ c: .c .Q < C..... -.- o>ro :>. Oc:(t W c:- ë :¡:;.&Èoð .- " 'C" 0 ctlOC(!) 'S: ro I/) -g c:mQ e" c: J Q)Ví~(I) 0 o.Q) .. Eo....."'C (1)'<: '" EU>.c - - '" OC..cro Q).<: c: ( ) :~ " U 0"'0 II) -5j ;: E vi ~I c:1 ~ :;::; <LJ C> E 0. 0. 0.; ~ ~ "'I .. '" 'C c: _0> E E EI 1!¡W ~ (/J ë 'S' ';; 0 '" " c: .!1! .!1! c: .!1! ~ ~ ( ) .- ro ('(1:'= U l~ c: - '" I!! "I "'~ '" co 0 '" co 0 " 'ï:: E"O_ II) "', COI u Q) Q) '" - <J) 1-(3 ~h ~ ro Q) Q) '- ~'C I!! c: I!! c: I- C:I- 0. "I, " ~I~ I!! E - > Q) '" c: ~~ ~~ E "'''' E-'" 0.._ E '" .f! " .!1! u. " ~I~I ~I ~ ~i ,;¡ E E 1:' ~,Q " 15.1/) EU, , ~ :J .- Q) .9 <J) .- .. ~I~ ';; ~ "'- " ~ " "'~ "'- ~I~ (I) - U (I) E '" 2 j i¡ ;:::jl.c (;j ~I..c. "'C (I) c: " .:: :;:~ t0 'j, ~ , E E I- "11_ c: ..9:! g>= u ,,- .....~(Ij ~.§ ~i ~ ~ ..c._ co = ",g š o 0 I- ~ = W <J)_ W(_ $ "1-", CD '" o u;1 (/)1 O'.....,(/)i o "..L (f), I- Jgiù:.¡::« (I) c: 0 G:';g OJ ~I~I ìY .!1!jª1 LtI~'ª1 ~ (/) ra! Z C'llI)æ.....: .~; c: IT =ïcl I mira; LL. ~i=1 W ,,!, "I § , - '" "!'1";2 .!!! c___ £.£ " T"'" ra, OJ ; ~I~I ~I NI.c¡~i ~ :õ .- II) 0 Q) I/) . .c ....1 "', ~ . .cl ul .c: :I: ;: 0 c. II) 0>- '" ¢:;: "0 t), .:s:::, -el õ IDI .:s:::¡ -ei ·Ci (/), ¢:;: "0'·-1 U U g~Q)~ c: >- " lij$l~ a:)lra:ÆI.... ~ ro ° .... N' rai 0' IDI ~ ....11::; V"I ... .- '" ¡¡: -"'T' ¡E1?'Ö~i .:=1"'1"'1:; .....I~iei~ 0 « o ro.L: 0 ;: E ~ "010/: 51 ¡¡;:- I:: 'x ¡¡;:: l::'õ':J -::J-- 0 . e §'....Ix o¡ ",1__1 e ra! ID,iJ-1 el § glx °1 ra! ID'X :è t: <V ell)>. =" . ~,t)1 "0 u.. tl(ñ'"Q)'Ü:! .L: C II) rn 00 1ii I ifl1?1 ü: I 1ii (ñ:"Q)' ï 1ii'ifj "Q) ¡¡:I U « ~ ro ~ a. Le>- ~!.... (01 "V æ!~1 æ,~i c::: 'I 'I OJ: c:::¡';'I~iN~ l1::i~¡';'lv: NI..... N: - ,..¡ M .,¡ on /,,)·3 i' - _..--._- ----~.~--- -- ------....-.---------- ~ ~ ~ ~ "" '" ~ 0 <Þ œ ... '" ~I CII':'" 'm i1ß 15- IA''''I~ i;o 'wiQ)" ':E ';u ~1"'i§l~ 1.þ.1Q)1...1~ IA TI':-' 1;0 :,.." --"I...... ~ ([ i:::J I~ 1~131"'1" :~ !¡j I:) :~ "'13 '" " :!!13 ,5'1- It~ " :!! œ.~ III I~ æ.1~ Il ~ 0> 1""'0 =r:"Q. ""Tlf-C l=rl~ x ~ I a -. a.¡-i~ IQ 1= o - xl ~ 0> I~I~ ,~!~ x ....>.,Q) ,0 ~ CD ([ 'ò -. CD Q) ò i'l;;;- ..... :E WiO ËI' Tb ë,cb IB. :::!'! IC 51 ..., :::!1 Ë~5.~ _,0> " "":;::;1" I~ 15'1:;::;1~ ..., CII .............. q; ¡-iOJ .-+ q; a~ ; I~ i:;::; !õ () ,Cb '0 'wi..... ii).g ~.þ. w 101(1) cp::T¡ ...... ~liiil:;::;lc. ~ 1~1a.1~ (I) :=, CÐ ~ IJ 0"1a. ?' '" o ~ '" o 1- (I) ,@ 18 il'-.) (II ã! ,8¡t'V '~I1'ì ~ Ia. S' I:::!> 3 ,0 (?i3 I~ ::E (") ,0 I' " g!!t;J "if'. :~:~ "if'. o " _ I~ ,,,:;::; 1...10 I~ :::::J '_ , W -. I I' <0 10 :"0 ! '::::J '3 I --1- " _ CI> ." =iü-n (f) I;: § (f) ¡Q.!;:: '~I~I~ 0> j~ Õ'~ r-g iÕ 1U ¡" -0 I- ii:):::J .þ. 0> ~ A ¡~. ::::io I 0,0) 'Q),:) 1/1 -:0 ~ - 0 <0 _ ~. <0 , ~ ;I~ I'" -i'" '0'0 !!!. :¡ ., -Ig¡m - ;;¡Œ 00 15 I;; ~ I:TI" :8 i§ g I~ È:~ I~i~ ã) -. ...... ~j~ -co - " 1010 ¡o ~i:T ~ 5'., ;:~ ,~ ,,' j~ S' r0- 'e ~I§ . Ie. e.jiiil:: a.!iiJ 18- Q I~ I~I~ ~ - ",- ~ g, -'" ,'" '" ~" '" - ~- ~'O ,0 ~ 13 ,Œ 1£ .,,- ,CI> ¡¡ 3 w" -. .. ~I~ c ~ ," 5'fg , e. I" Ii " ::::J:-C ig la "'0> ¡¡ g I~ - ~ -'VI "" "-0 3- '" I~ a. 'f It/! CD~ ~ 3 ,0> ;] I~ iü~ '0 r >< "',e. 3 e. õJ " ~ '" 0> 3 " '0 e. .'" m x ¡; õ' > , '- iiI r 0 .. r C"w(þ en"- '0 e.- " _ 0 £!. ~ ::0 :! ~ " , ~ 0 ::0 - I.~ ;¡:Ch'm ~ :;: ~ " .w en .'" ::r' _.: CD ~ 0 I~ en w ~ -< cE.,'ea ,g¡ 0 '" ... w CD ..:!. (11;:,'<" w '" ,w '" '" A eno -.... ;II:" <': 3'. 0 0 A 0 0 !=' 0 0 :s :; ..' 0 0 :.. 0 0 0 i:n ___ ca "::J 10 0 ~ 0 <0 ... <0 0 CI'I' c.' I~ en ~ :,:,::,'m, ~ -. O=' ::J 0: CD '" W '" ca. "'.., '" I~ '" '" ~ CI'I.,...,tct '" en en '" '" I~ '" - '< '" A <0 en '" en '" .:cc .;!.. oL\' o =::!: ~, 3 .;..;,;~ ~,''''' -.. a. 5" en "" ..,g Q =::!:'. go ;i",rn ,..:..;,;,." ~~ Z .. CI'.. üI .. - -~ /.1- J I '-. . .'~-,,- - ---,-_._'. ~-".--_.._~_.,--'_._~~"-----~--~-_.._. .""" ~- ~ u¡ - 0 0 .¡ .. '" .... ... .: " 0 <It 0 CO co M ;;; oi .,. 0 .... 0 CO 0 - .¡ .,. >.·'cn- ~ 0)0)"'- - I..c<:- CO Q)"_:.c:: 0> ;;: 0> LU~::,! ... en I;: <0 0 " 0 ~ ai _ U G> I;: .... 0::: .10. .- o .E M _'Cc. _0'" .!.ra.c .. 0 ~ ..., ..: 0 ~ ~ ~ c." '0 'C .. G> U G> U> ,,:; OJ G>_ U> o 0 0) 0 os: .. <fJ '¿f r-- <D .. ro ci <;; 0: E W ..; ~ .,; ~ .,; I ~ ,.: ~ .; ..J « ~ en I- -- I.)'" '.2. ~ 0 0 N .,..: l- N - ......m ..._ - - --, - - ~ IAI~ ~I~ '" '" ~ I O)lwl~ :u j[ji[ I~ I~ 1""-1"'1:" '<õl -o-Q)-t » C) ...,.,I::J cb CD :n13 s: re. ¡~Id> d>:re. 00 OJ (t)::J:J'" ::j ~ _'10. ::J ~ ." 1""- C= '< ~ ::J (t) ~ ....... CD 0 :i 1"0 ....... a >("r' ...... i~ I ffi" ::II..... . 3 ~ ;r ~ßI~ . _.....c_ » 0 c ro .... ~ !:; I~' ~ ~ lë&~r " Q::r~º- ... 'ii! 1"1 ¡;: '~ g 1'< A iD 0) -. :::+(1)(")0 C) C) I ~ !~I~; :(j)i::Tl~ ... '< :J :I: tn '0 CD g: ñi~ ~ ~ ",'" ~ -g ß ~. '" i~ 3ì ? tn'iiJ -" ~ ;;: <: o - 'I\.) I:::!:I 0 U'I 1¡g:lo ~ ~ :J5' ¡¡; I~ '''I' ~I~¡~ -.......... :J m i~ ~ '3 10 0 I:;: ~ a. _, ;-+O(t)(n(Q löï~ ~ Q~ 5 0 -,'" :þ~Q).-+ Z $ ICT ...... 0 ~ '0 ~ C/I -'0 ~ :J '" -. < OJ -i ~. Ie!. 0" m , ,(I) n I, ,0)0 § [I~ o <:> ~ ¡)'C =~:rQ: .... Ii:' ~~~ () W -~ , 3 '" ~ :J ,CI) l!ll§ -i g S·I.O CD . W"'o. I~IÈ g. Q..lfi) -i ;::~ '" 3 3 !!! _ w ~ ~ !:: Cf 0 ~r.n en ~'" .a. c: 3: ,~ ~ ~ ~O) ':IE Q (/I III tñ J\.) ~ -. ~ õ ~ 3' § '~. ~ ~ ~ '0 ~ 6'-< t¡ ~ ¡¡; .!... CD ~ CD ::e w c =: 3 _000 3 0 S:3 ;0 (II :) ~ ~ ~ :::!! ;::0:13 ;¡ g ~ :J 0) <D <- ¡¡ 0. @ - ' 0_ CD :J'"r-c ;¡ a., ~ ., CD (t) Q) g. ~v. ~ '" " '" !lI\,)UI ¡;¡ CD CD Cf à. 3 :::1- ."" - 0 - 0 o , " 0)- "''' "'0 "'0 ~ ." " n =:W Q) _. CD ~ "'0. o 0. o 0. rdo. 0 ~g. s.:S.;:a. en -i o _ o _ 3 t6g.91-. a.~ o.~ -i CD 3 '" 3 :E g} ~ ¡¡; ~ :::+CD VJ a. õ' ~ I 3 " ::TCD Q)cr::::Jo 0. - ::J '< 0 3 i·v. ~ 5'''' Q.g£3 ~ CD'" õ' , (neD-CD ~ n 0 o Q)~:J v. 0) < G)::Joc. 0 oë.: Qo::::J-9l ooicn " c -. c CD -. '!' -:J ~Q)~g =~ ~'" (DCD > õ'g ::J ;; ñ), (/) v. m > " :J n @OJ=õ' >." '- ;¡ '" ::::J S. ~ """ !D 0", ()~ 0 ~ <:> -", :::!';::::Jro'< C' - (;) CD ' êß ~ a. g ",. cnl!.l,.!. .. :JO '0 " ~ m <DC (f . <'''' (þ e: 0 , :J C) -; CD är 5' "'a. no", '< -. ëi) ~ Q) Q. :5"'1 (þ n '" :J n ~ ~ (þ :J =: ~ a " O)Q' CI) :J a.-< ::!1 ~ < , ~ c:..., ~ :¡. 5'3 33::T...¡ " ",0) 0) eT <D > (I)=: -CD:J:J'" 10 . 0 C'D .., CD CD ;¡ 0) :J Ch..,__ ~ :Jo o (t)"'C Q) CJ) m 3 0.:J ::J"C Q) g " ~3 -< êiJ '< CÞ c: >< -;::cnm " . en [= m ~ CD 0) CD n ~ '" :e ~...~. 3 ,a:J ~",(I) :s: ~ '" "' ::T -', CD C ,<'< "'. - 0 ~ ..... ..... '", 0<' cð.' r.a ~ n9. _-i::T :s: ~ "' .... '" ~cn'< ~ ::T::TCD c: 0> CD ~ .... ::!1 0_ CD CD 3 ~ "'::T » -f ~ --<D CD :J CD ~ C' "'3 '" <D 0) :::c <: =-cn cno " :J CD 3", C _0r.I( ) ~ 0) " !!!.~ õJ -< m ~<3 cõ' ~ '" ~ ~.-. " -·C <DeTe. 0 0 '" CD ~:: œ " atãJ 0.0) CD '" '" '" '" CCI:~ co. :J n '" 0> '" 0> '" (,/ I.'; a;- :; en C '" n :ï n c;¡ 3 (') :::::!. 0 CDn crg-g ~ ¡:¡'O '" 0. <D '" 0 ~ ;:m ~ <'3 ..., -. :J ~ <D3 o 2l. ~ ï -. o~ S' -"'CD ::::I O'eD 0) CD '<OW .. .. CQ (II ~ .Q 3 :J .. ~ 0> '" cø_cc: c 00. CD_= ~ 0> .... CD ;; '< 0) _ 3 '" .... 0 "' !!!. c <D ø ffi OJ ~ ~ :Jo. -' g: _. ro .C') - "'m <D 3 a. 0 0 0)- ~ :J '" _."'0 CD C') '" ~ a. CD --:J 0 ;¡ oœ =r ",:E CD CD <D ~ 33r.a z '" Ot!: 3' O)::T ::~'< -i C') "'3 ,<CD ~ ":::'111' n eTC;¡ 0-", iTI ~ cO)O) ..¡;- " 0) _. C') -' c.: ~ n:J ã: 5' s. -i t¡ :¡. ~:T _:J:J z ~ O)n'" 9 ~ ii. @o _en 3 c;¡ -'" 0 0'- c '" 5'", " 0 ... ;:> 0 n <:> . 0> ~-~ C') . L t!'ó"" .... " ;i m " '" '" CD 0> '" . ,<" 001:·::::. $:'<:.% AI- cr- CD': CJX</'t :~;I{"_::: 1;1.- J:J '--- ...- -..- ----- ~-'----'----~- --- --..-----.-.- --.-- -~ 0 "1 .... ,~.;.... 0 .}J~ .:-f 0 GI.cta ..; ;-2;-::',~': ~ ..~ D.., to ... " W> M oð:¡:¡ CJc", 0 M of: ..¡ "'.5 .... ... TJ,.;.... "... '1ã-~ l"- E :1;) N '';j'O a) N "0 ¡;; .; W ... ~ .2:' ~ to ::"",;..; 0 ~-O'I C) ... 4),0 I: 0 N C::'O .- 0 N W-~ 0 '" 'TJ.,U) ..... cm ;.-. I"- ".5.3: M "'- E_:~.-~ '" to ~-_U) ~ ... >oO'l,"i:' C) ;cn~ """ ;=-~ ">3: c:: _ft! ,:¡¡¡; wU)_ iE .. 0 u ~ ~ '" " .- '" ~ u o " o;:;c. ::::'cU) .. ".0 - 0 ë ..., ..: Q) :; ¡; " 0, c ~ j¡ " 0 " :.s..CfI .- co <;;, -:15 ~ " ..J ~:¡; il "'::<1 ~ ~õ a.. =1 ro . u..i ro 0 '¡ij~"" ~ f- iiíl.c ~,N E =1 tD1 "4 ..; N ~ ~ ~ .; ~ en 1.,1::1'/ - -.--.. .; - - ,.: - - .,; --- - '" I'r '""r ..., ~ :~ wi<fl;u I~I~~ ~ '" II>iNI~ '<"Tl 'Q-"'-i :I> 0 T1 :J m'm Q) I~ cb ( ) .þ.' , CD O:J' (þ ° ° Q) rn :J ::r ~ ~ w >< .(1),œ, -. a. :J .... "Q.::J'-+ 0'I1œ.. ~ q 'TI a.1~1..... c = '< U) :J ctI IT! w!~la .::s. ...... ([) 0 I¡¡I~ '" ò "CD CD 0 x· ....... CD la 3 ~ õ':f~õ' 0 x" ro kã I;:;! !~ cD .., ~ Ie cb .... ~ x'~ .., ~ Ë ro kè ~ '"0 n ... ë ~I'< .to. 1m CD A !m ¡CD b- e g A @ roj< .þ. iÞ '" -, ;ro;-o 0 ,<" :c '(j) ;Sl ¡~ ?' 'U) ('*) ro ~ en (') ro ~ ro --1m ;::::;0 en ~I~ ?' " ",,<0 (J) '"00 ::: ". q ~. ã~;..., (I) 0 ~. '" ,,~ CD 0 (I) _. ;;: " U'I IQ 'a. Cf giQ· ,.. 0"0'" o ,n .þ. '" a.:=: -~""":J m õ; 1::1 ¡9, , Q) _. I 21'" .", :J :-o-cooo(Q ,W CD " -··CD " -"ICD " ~~~ _.(f »~n>...... z ~ I=>i=> ... o => ... o => ... n a .þ. 0 " (f 0"-0 0" -10 '" - 0 0"0"0 ~ _. < w -i C-¡..... 0 o C '" õ'c =~:,.ç: I~'C' m II>O"m ~C"m -O"m ~Q:lm .. ~ !it 'I~ (f) =ID(f.) -"en Q; ~(I) Df=cn ..." -< ~ 3 g 5'<0 (þ ;:'" , I~'Q) -I ~ 5f --t ~=-I ::Iã)-{ '" " -< ~ 33 en 0 _VI en rolU) ....... - '" ~ -II>~ c.",~ -"'~ " !¡ " !!!-'" ,... 1S¡:(ñ N -..., !!1.N " - '" ¡;;", " -. '" õ m. 3" 3 Õ' '" ",'0 õ·-<! a I:E ã) " - " w ¡¡¡ " w " i> c ~ " ¡¡ _. II> " " '" 3 -, 'Q 3 12i,",~ 5' 3 §3 :::!¡;::;; 3 §3 ~ g Cl) < - -< Cl) ~ @ o.~ ..., CD m [l) 10 I:)" ~'" p,,,, '" f'''' Cl) Cl) (I) ~ 3~. 10" W (I) @ "'- I~ -n OJ "II> o , " "" =:0) S? <:' ~ ~ "'=> ' " => w=> 0 " 0 -N=> '" ~Ola. NC. '" C. ",c. 0 <0 ~ s· ë.:..... (I) --< -< -< -< 3 :;0 ~ to CD ~ ..., I~ '" '" '" 3 (I) c. õ· ~ i> W I~ " ;:+m Q)CT:JQ ,Q) 3 3 :J ::rCl) :J '< 0 3 '3 c. :Tur -0 r 1-'" è" ~ 0......°3 I'" I'" Cl)"O en ffi JC. ('þ õ' o a o OJ "C ::J " '" < '" ñ"ã: G)"oo. 0 QO:J.....~ C -. t: m -. :J -" ~Q!.~g :I> .:;:: !!!.<O <.. ¡¡¡ õ' C" :::J (f) w' (f) 0 " :I> " '" @w=õ' C"D)0 :J 00 :J ~. ~ ..., en -'" (1)::1.- Cl)'f¡ ~:J(1)'< 'ge:õ C < (Q :J 0 G) " ° m~o:£; ~. s: ;u "" Cl) c < ~ ~ m ~ " "'~Cl)ii!' 5' ~~ m:::T'Q)o .. 0 (DCD:J=: '" 0 .. " - " "'õ' (/) :J a.-< :J < ~ r-+ C r-+' - 5·3 3· 3 ~ -i m <' en '" <0", ~g:J::r ~(/) !::!:: >< :I> ° CD -, CD CD C (Q '" " en...,...._ m ~ @ " ° o CD"'C Q) s: 0 Q) c." :J"'C Q)!2: 0 0 '" '" -'" " - m '< (1) W '" -... Õ1 ~ 3 ~ 3 ':<(/)C"_ s: C ~ Q) '" ... <D " Cl) '" CD~![ 0 '" '" -. '" :J - <ò" ;:;.;:,\",(/) » -t 3 ,<'< (J>' ~ 0° ~-i::r :::c - c ::r::rCl) < '" 0;::: - Cl) Cl) 3 -< '" (f ::r m -~Cl) Cl)" Cl) ~ ~ iiI (f Cl) '" <D 0 ~ N ~ - ""3 !:!':.....(/) ¡" 0 0 :.. 0 C' " Cl) 3"0 C '" '" Q) -. N '" '" '" ~~ CD .. ~ (f Cl)"'o. cë -·c '" ~ o.",Cl) " -Cl) " 0 (f " S'(I) c '" 0 c. o¡¡¡ 30 ::!. ~ '" 5' ~ 0 ",0"0 0 '" Q) '" 0 !:!':o CD~g Õ1 '" '" ..... ~ , < 3 ..., -":J '" N -. 0 a. Cl) 3 o ~- '" '" '" '" <D " -(f Cl) ~ '" Cl) '< ° (J> _0 ¡; 3 " CD_!:!: 0 .a oc. "'~3 ~ c Cl) ëiJ::rQ) 0 c " C. Cl) ~ 0 ;¡ !!. iii' s: -. CD z .? ",m Cl) 3 C. -< :to _."'C CD ;:a 0 õ' " (J> ~-" :I> ii1 o.Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) ~ "0:;0 3 3 ~ 0 I:) - -< :J' ",::r :;oCl)<O '" ,<Cl) ,,'< Z 5' gëD owen 9 0 0-' £!:!:~ '" "," a. 0 _. " (J> ~ ~"" - . ::r "'0<0 <' oj @ 0 ~cn ~ " ¡¡¡ (J> N " ~~ L 3 "0 ° - -. II> 0 ° " c -;::¡. '" cb :J '" "" -. '" ~" I';'~.J~ ~- .__..._.._-_..-~..- .. ___ ....._.u______ -~ ,- '.;.;, .·)::'ä:~ "':cu::l!! "'fÞ\Q:CU Z':>-CU "~þ :fÞ W<>" öð;:; (!) ':c..4oI't CCU cn~ ";;':" >'.:.!!,,~ ·--.CU E.1i) ':;:;0 "0 ;w ,.,...... ... ".<?:> .,. N en en '" '" N -:>':':::- "- co CD "- '<T '" o-·en ¡;; '<T '<T '" '" N ... ,enC) tI> Ñ tI> tI> tI> CU.O·C tI> in-_(.)_ 'S; .. en " ':en '" ~ en 0 0 0 ,'C"O) '" en '" 0 0 0 .".." .§" 0 0 .. 0 0 0 E,>:~ ~ cu:ca- @ oen c 0 '" >, [;;1 u '" ~ co c CD co :'>,':'0 :'.'i:" ð ~ N en 0 Q. '<T '" C)O.>- CD. CD '" '<T ~ 0 en ...·C·- .¡ M .¡ o ~ B .¡ Ñ cu·-,¡,c ~ If! CI:) 8 ,,> .:;: N w.ca~ ~ Q.~ en_ ~ c c ~ 0 c: g. CI:) c:: u ~ - § 8 b '" u - g .. u'O:o - U 00'0 C ,) !E "'C ë B ¿ ¿ 0:: ~ U '0 0 ~ ~ o 0 GO 0 ë 0 c.: c.: ~ ¿ _=ac. :0 ~ oJ oJ _cU) 0 ª .!,.ftI.c ~ ¿ ~ ~ .. 0 c e .., 0; -¡¡ .~ '~ '0; '0; ~ ¡¡, u ~ ~ < '" u CI1 '" ~ õ - ;::; ~ ~ .,., . 0 '" .,., .,., '<T '<T '" ~I i!' '" '" '" '¡¡ " i!' i!' £ '" 5 " " ¡¡ æ x x x i!' ~i "" '" '" '" '" co ~ co " ~ E '" '" CD X xc "' "' "' '" ~¡ - '" 0 0 0 "'- E e: e: '" E 0- ~'" .2 " o e: " .2 .~ .~ 5 e ",- "'''' c 1) -", _ e: - e: ' - " .. ë 1J~ - '" .B .~ " B !:J .- " f- f- e: u e: GO õ." " '" 'ë " I" Õ Õ '" "e: '" " ~ OJ " 0 .- .. " " ~ ~-~ " 0 " 0 0_ ~ GO :0 :0 "'''' -" ~¡ ~::E '" ~o < < " e: ~'~I'" 0' '" õ '" e: e: 1", 1?1J'" "'- e: !I GO_ e: " ð e: ð " e: 00 ~ .f: E '" '" '" " 0, '" _ E '" e: .. w C a.. tt.!1 g a.. ~I ~I ~ e: " " e: "" e:1 " :¡¡ ~I " e: :< '" ~ <3jÖI .- <I:: cn "', '" :?: u!o' '" "'I ¡;j '" '" "', ~il åiE "'''' ~ 00> O!(Qi>lcn 81:?: '" " ~I~ aNa (I), 01"'10 " " e:1 e: ..- a:: NI ~I ~~~~I ~'" 5 ~ "101 ~ '" -I~ o g a. .z "{'OJ '" , xl OJ 2'~i ~I ö¡ ° a.. .... o'~ " ~ ~ ~æl ~I rolCI .... <.01 LL bl.c ~Iîl gl ~!o '" "''''iEI.. "1"1 "" ~ 0, 0:: ro ~1U1~ 0::1", !!!I~ 0::,:< ill! -"IE co, 51'~1 CD, .,; ,..: có a> 0:;; ~ ... ..; ~ ~ ~ ~ I-'-'~ --. ... ---- .--~---~- ..-"_._----,.._._,---_._,.._-_..~-- '" '" - - - - - - - ? IA'¡;l~ ~I~~ ... a> '" ~Ii :"'1- -I'" I ~ Is 3- ~ is 13- ~ ~'iS- (J) I'" ro u. '" ~~ _ '" ~I~ 0 ""T1'- -.... x w=:- 1° ~ ",!i " x"~ ~ a _. a. Q) Ig ê: :::!. [U IS: ~ I~ ~ :J~ ~ < = < = " Ë:~ D.. ~ iëD 0 ~ g ., 0 c: Iã) ~g ~ N It) ()~-" 18 ,'" I h " 1>" ., :I~ en I'" 0 0 I~ '" " I=> '" " 01" => 'u) In" a. ?' '" 3 0 :J1('þ a :)'C: lQ o .c: ~ ~~ " ~ ~ 10" CT ...... I~ I" :¡; q-c::i:õ P 1£ ;g 3;¡o D.I ~ ::J () _. Q. @ i» II ~,=> '" ¡:~ ~~ '" '" 3 1== W "'T1 . - => CD;?. 3 01" '" '" ., '" ""~ "''' ;-'I Q)' 3 OK => => '" ~ c: ., 13 jU) '" " '" '" " CJ> 00 'r-+~. j o => -., 0 0 :T- cn¡C'D ~ Q :T", '" 0 ~'" » ~ 0. 0- '" '" ,'" => '" => ¡;¡ ;¡:CJ> 9'''' '" '" ,=> => Ë c ii) I~ => '" '" ~I~ -¡¡; CJ> '" => 0 => ~ '" !:: 0 " " 3 o => " -. ';'3 '" '" o ~ o ~ CJ>'tI =i => => c: -'" - '" -0 c = 0 - - '0 0- 0- 0 '" ~ 0 - ., ¡¡; ~. ,- " 0 " 0 " ... '" => ... => 'c: 10 Ë °JË " --i 0. 3 :T 13 ~. 3 c: 3 c: =>0 co ., >< ~ =>0 => '" 0 iii' 0 CD' e- => 1& :'\. ~ 0. '" 0. '" o.~ , '" c: (J) <J> <J> '" i~ ro b =>0 ... ;;, ¡x >< =>0 IË Ë >< 9' I~ ro Ë ,'" ro I'" '" '" (') s: w w w '" 0 w 0 0 ... < ~ :R ~ ~ ~ " S' . . '" (/> (/> (/> (/> » ~ ~ .~ ~ ro "" 0 1< < < '- 0 i:ï S' S' S' 0 ., ~ 3 ~ C"'G)U) ~ ~ ~ ~ ",,,- m m m 'tI 0. - ¡;¡ '" '" '" CD Õ 0 '" ~ ~ ~ ~ (') ~ ;:0 ~ ,,- 5 ! (') ~ CJ> 0 '" - .0;:. enm (J) :E. ~" - co A ::r-',o CD! - A :.., io I~ (J) io '" -~ca - <J> '" '" (J) <J> - d;~'<~ '" 0 '" co co <D co "'0 _Q)(D '" "". <. 3 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 ~:¡' ., '" '" w '" '" '" '" '" (Q,::::I '" <D A ... 0 0 0 0 ø',e,; '" " < m ... -·0 :::J :::10 fD ... <J> ... ~::!!l ca ... ... - '" I~ ... A ... - A co :;;' <J> " - ..;..;,/,. ',' '< " co '" ... " <D '" -<: .:::!.' ~'- oIr o :::t. !! .3 _w ",- -'" a. :r'm n·:c ~..,~;,G) =RO :::.~ 'U . ;:.:1 z G)'.C".(þ ëð DI_' -~ v /.2. J') _. .~.~--_.~._-~--_._- ,---- .-. ;:!I:,Ä Ø> :~"-::~-f ... CJ ,.Q"cg N Z¡;-;Ë ... 0 üJ<:'~ "! ... 05:::= en (!) c..,. co C Q) M (I)~ ... en " It) ..- N -'" .,; ..- E·'; <ø =0 ... an(.) 'L' ~. .... ... " ~ ~~,';' ... ... N ¡;;; ... co ,-Ine) .. .<ñ G.I :Oc s:: U.'- N 'W ,.",;-;~ ... UI "tJ en ~ N <Þ C ,tn~ " ex> <ø ..,,::: 0 0 -M E»·.~ ~ 41 ns:...... CU) ;"i/)':i;- 0 <J) ... '" " ~ EJ,"g'~ "- ~ <Þ Q I~__.c ~ '<i cñ " >:;: en wC'lS..::.::: N UI_ - '" e '" - C) S CD !E " '-CJ õ o .E G.I -~ _"c. c _cUJ ~ u .!!.cu.c .õ: ¿ .. 0 ËÕ <;¡j f ..., 8 <;¡j c < u " ~ E ~ 0 0 u ~ '" co " (t -I u "0 .. E '" '" .!!1 OJ u ex> !'!' r OJ i "'" ~ £; (t u. 0 e Q) U)'õ " OJ U ~ OJ o ~ ë '" E.<::", '- " OJ .!Q 'j ~ ë.'" 0 5 .- .. u " N _ (t ~ OJ 0 '" ~"'"O 1;::;; - õ I- ~ c: ..- .<:: (t ~i2 ~I c 0 £ 01_ "'I '§ E ... c: (t '" 0 LJ..Q. = o u c\¡lëJi~ I õ;;: '" ~I~~I~' ~~ OJ 5 ...J - ~~ " ~ xi '61 ~ 'g¡!; iIl '-C_LJ... 0 "',.<:: WI 0/ 0/ 0 I EI~ ~i CI:::¡........... ('\ I I t- o< M .. ..; .,; ,.: cO en N N N N N N N N I~...:¡rr -..--------.-...- ~ .. (r'''I~ ~ ......~Q) 1.......1;0 I~ I~.!~ '" ~I- ;" 'w -1-;" -<Ol 'O-"'-i ~ 0 -Þ.!::J Im:ro }1 ~ I~ ~ ¡!'VeL cL rø w ' , 00 Q) CD :J ::J'" ,,¡Q.I::J ;:::t j9'iQ ,,- ::J .-+ I-..J ~I~ & c: = '< ~ :J Cf) :j ~ ~·tkåi~ ~ ,0 ~ I~ ~ I'" _.ro 1(1) i3 " ~ ¡(fI 0 I 3 ~ Õ':T~õ' ;~ I())I~ '~::¡'I~ '" ~ Q'~ "" » 0 ø 1(3 ... , '" ~ . <C ~ ." 0 ~ ~:CÞ¡<A. ¡~ I~IN !(I)i:J .þ. ¡-. 0 ~ ..þ. I 0 ~!A- iD '" -. ;m;;-~ 9 ,i): I~I~'~ œ i IN ·m ~'!<11 ;::t I.., :JIm' ,<" :I: ;(fJ õ ~,¡> '3\ ,f)!~;~ ~ ""ca ~ -g g ;;. ,r,o n,~ . ~ ;;: c: ! Ig IQ. ~ ~1:2: ICT 0 A. r::rlõ 'N O"'OIW œ ,,- ¡; Q) -. , Q) i-'II c.::!. -""'''''':J m õ' I~ " '&fl~ " !!!.'ffi' , ~I~ I~ " ;-+O~cnco 1_. ¡:¡r;a.~ -.<11 Z $ 10" 1'-+ è œ I" 0 I(/) .-+  C/I -;0 - " <II }>C:~6f -i ..' x '0 1_ 0" 0 ~tTD :~,C'" m ;;;¡.- ;(1) IU ,n) m _0) II) rn ... c-Im o 0 !'! õ'c: =~:rC" .... lit lUlU en Co '" i5.!&f ~ I" = (f) ~ ~ (J) ~ œ .... ~ 3 (') -·CC CD ~I~I-i -. :a. "- ~ .... c..1~ 1:1 ::: ~ :r 33 'Co - cg ,ctI ,co ~ CO ~ œ ~ œ 5i ~ _(I) U) 'b I~ " ,Co ~ lut I" ~ ... ~ Dol 1-:'" ~ S,,,, &¡ ~'o ~ -. -- CD -. c I~I~ -·'m ã: ::E Q) CD i Q) rp ~'ñ) ~ 'C œ õ'-<! 0" 3 3 ~I~ ~ s: 3 [i'::r3 &1"'13 c 0: ~ 3 ""'0 ~ g ~ " '" (1) < - 3 -g, \J (I) 0 g,1~!g œ I~ UJ Q , Co e.~ ..., ~CD CD Q) o , -n ~ Q I~:~ ~ (1) (1) (f) a. 3 :::::!. l-n ~ rg ~ -n ~ œ "'- ,w" w" w " 0 m <:" CD N ~"- =-:0) I~ "- ",,- ...."- 0 " " 5' ã: ;:!. ~ .... '" '" 3 ca- li '" õ> õ> 3 :;: !IJ. CO CD ~ ..., 'õ> 3 3 œ (fJ a. õ' CÞ 13 " ;:::::O:ro Q)C":Jg "' "!' I~ "- ::T(1) ¡Co F J!!. -- :J '< 0 3 ::TV> e.-o Õ (1)'0 C/)::r(/ 3 " " a (1) - (1) ~ Ot\) ~:J 0 '" < G):Joa. " oë: Qo:J-œ ~ c: -. m~~c: -" > > S,ca 5' - ~ g .... ~ " -. 0' C) ~ ~ (f) œ g '" 0 ~ '" CD < -._ C"~"iiì 0 0" :J -. :J 0 ",,,- G> -cŠ _:J C)'" <'(Q (t) '< -¡e:õ po (1) ~ (t) (f) :J 0 Q,g;r m " 0 (f)' ~c:: 5' (1) c: eJ--t<'" ~ ~ ~ " "':::r(t).,.,.. 0 cae. ~ 0 œ '< -. CD (t) eJ ~ '" ~ <II " CD :J-. - < "'õ' U):Jc.= ~c::_-< œ < ~ 33 ::T' > :;'3 m '" ca '" eJC"'(t)--t (J) ¡¡¡ <11- -(t):J:::r >< I.. - õ' (t) .., CD (t) C ';?CI)m œ '" " <II ~ _ m 3 o(t)-c5) ::;;" :I œ 5.0 :J -c eJ C'" s: 0 ... ~ " 'I\,) ;:rS. tþ ~ (1) " ':¿m~CÐ ,- - :::I..... .. j" 8 - .g¡ ~1e.1e 3 " 3 . <II s: C U1 '" ~ .....,;.UI>'O'C:: (t)eJ= <D U1 co ~ iW c: (1) '" " " <II » ~ cd" (¡)?"êñ -f ~ -<'< '" " 0 ----t:r ;::c <: I~ ~ ::T::T(1) <110 ~ 0- (1) (1) -< <11- _"œ tT _::T (1) " 3 m ~S;3 œ - (1) <II (1) (1) 0 0 0 0 ,?> :::I: ~ ~ 5'3 0':_c.J " '" :". <0 ...... Ie :::I .c 3'0 <II I" ~ c. '" (1) 0 ~ W 0 ,0 " " '" '" '" c: œ 0<11 --< ~ c. (1) 0' (1) 5' Dr s::: e.",e. -~ I~ <II _.(1) " 0 CD ~ 0 " <II " '" <II s.ogt ~ " ~ 3 g g. c. (1) (1) ~ :::I otþ .. ~ ~ U1 (Q L/I:'" ~ " 0 0',,'0 0'·0 ~ ~. g; ~ I~ ~ " Ù1 ~ ~'" S' ë6 3 U1 w '" ~ '< So ~_:J <D 0 W '" .Q '" 3 c -< 0 (1) !!!. 3 (1) 8 ~ 0" (t)_~ '" -. <: c: e. .., :T 3 0 Õ' " (1) <II (1) '" 0 ;¡J ~ _e. - - Z <II' :::r -. (t) :I> 9' "'m (1)3e. .... 0 œ ,,- =;:"2.m ~ ri1 5' e.<II (1) (1)" n (1) 3 3 ~ 0 " '0:;: .... œ " "'::T :;:(1)ca Z - -< (1) o 3,'< p < O'~ œ '" (1) c: '" <II ~ " -. ë:g;~ "''' 3 ?J:r _:J 5' 0 "'"ca c Vi" "'0<11 " (1) <11- ,. ~ - - 0 '" I (1) o - '" '0 L 0 01 ~ ::<. " - co io co U1 '-, IJ·.:J , ~ .- "--" ----~-_._~.~_..._-_.~-~-~---- --- ---... ,....~ .[.'ti.'%;- ~ .€.... u - -II'; :z..:;. <>. " w> ..'" CI"", o .G, cn~ i; ";- E1;; '" 0 ~u ~ - 0 '<t ml '" 0 >to>'- ~ ('\ ('I') LO "it N 0)'+0 ~ fA- ""it Iß. I{) "'" ...../n Q Ñ ~ .'ep ,0 C ~ ¡fi.p> .. :(1) .,,, ~ 8 ;! 8 8 .f¡ .g»,.s-- 0 0 çj d d E .>.:Ç: <f " .. - ~ c '" 0 . c " co » -'" <O[ "I '" g ~ >- '-iII--.-... LO LO N ,..... 1/1 ~ (") cnCl'l '>" ~ C"') LO M S 0. N ~ .E ":2 ~·I «; ~ i3 ~-~~ I ~ö - ~ ~.~ ~ æ 0 c::: c..~ - E[ ~g~ I ~ ~ üo5 o lit . U . ... U ..J . 0 ~ "C ~ 't 'Þ: <II ~ ~~ 0::: c::: .... Õ c..:"'E c s:: 0..: o CI.I . _ :::1:::1 . 0-0. :.ë L:JCCO L:J _ " " c::: :::I "==' """ eel) ......,= VlO...:;.... ~ ~ .. .g :<:1 :"~ ,r ~ ª ª .~ " .., "I....J = =.~.~ ~ ~~.g CI;~ðü cr. 13'~ '#-~õõ '# :;:10 ~ 'I~ ~ :ß U)I en .... l1)i ~ 51 E -= XI rn -= - 00: ....... OJ _ .r:::. ro '<t Iõ ~~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ :,.¡ c.; 0 o ., 't 2; -= ~ EI [ ~ ~. 1:41 fij..-õ ,-0 ÆE 0 0 o .... .r:::. ( ) ::J 4-' (1J U 0 ~~ ~j~ ~~ ~,~ $¡ .s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :J [j ~¡ ~ ~¡ ~ " ... N = C O' EI 1:1 Q) !!! ~ !!, ..... .... 0 , .... ..... Ill' ....: IJJ C 0 I- .E = 11)1 01 ~I g :}¡j "I g, $' CDi (; o IJ E "tJ CI (,) c. I (,) (/ M ë rn (I ! . .- Iõ= >.; ro 4,): >- [t c u. - > :::::I' Q :> +-' 0: a., III' 010.: Q) . '''~'' > 0' 5' >, ~ c, "I ' c, "I " ~ ~ ..01 8 x ~i a. [i ~ {j': ~: ~ >.: ~ Q)'~ IJ) ..- ~I'¡;::I:ß ..--1 E '" allEi ~! 13'!E gl M 0 CI.I ('IJ co ~i.... (1:1,' 8. C Q) (,) 0 a.: 0: 0 nI! - ~..... - N .- :J _ ._.... . 0 C :J, 0 C a.. 15 ¡¡ ¡¡ ~ 15 rn ~ð 151 3:1 ~~! 'iii 1i 8! 'iii11i1 ö: .= c -.- .=.c -0 I.L .= C"ï w;._ .µ, 0 0 +:>; a! u w'!Jcpu.. w?~CX) Q)~"-O'LL In: ..- VI! 0 '" - ~ N¡ '" ~IJ"'i "'! rnl "i~! ~I~ NI ~I~I ~i ~ ~ ø m ci ~ N M ,... ..... .... ,... 1.2· ~p -- -- ------ - -..-....---.----.--..- N N .... ...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 u::I CD ..... 0 Ut .þ. ''''' ,,,:;,, I~'~ 1,,';" 1- ~ I~I;" I" 1- ,,- '," - ','- '"I -1'- ~ ~'I'- I'" 1_'1'- 1-nY'!ch:ro ,, :JcbICD 1-Þ.:Jcb,CÐ 0 ~!~!o ~'~ 0 I::J~ CD:::J~ 0 :J,~ -" ~ I lit : 't -. C. :J : q- "c..:J i!::t ñ i (1) lit '(') ro 'íit 0 ! g ! lit 0 I:J QT i (') r8 I nr 1~~I5.!~ ~tcåi~ 1~U1ltå'~ ~ i~i~ ~ .~I~ ~ I~I~ § í'= ~ ~~ :m ã i~ I.þ. Im;ii' I'<.þ. 1õ1 ~ '< .b. 'I» !8!g 'II) g g ,II) lñJ Ig ;u ICD ~ II) 10 g ~·ia.?, I~'~?' 'VIi~I~?' ~o Ig!.§ ~ Ii}-õ i,~ 15-5 ~ ~-§ 5 ~-6 Ig" .þ,. 0 (') .þ. 0 (') 'F\,) '\I) i IU ì< I( ) I~ ~ (') II) '< (D Q) ~ 'I'~i-\' ~. ~+. B' ~' ;, ~ '5 ~ '5 ¡!ß 10 L~ en 1m ~õ m ~ ~ Q) (II ,.þ. C" .... .þ. .....þ.:J ~:J '< ,:J !O r< CD :J II) ~ '(I) íà 10 .(1) IJ'" 1° tT 0" 0 fg 1(1) ~ IVI:~ 3 (II ~ (f ~ 0 Cf II;,'" I~ I~ Qf I~ 1m ~ ª= 1m lüI I!! I;¡¡ ,!! I;¡¡ ~!! Q !!;¡¡ m!! !¡, ¡> 5.g:-I ~ml-l ~PJI-I I/) VI (I) IJ CII (II 3:'" I...... úf ..... .-+ r+ ...... ¡g ,Q g g g", ~ 1(1) ~I~ I~ ::E I~ (/J VI III (I) 1/1 AI _ .... "TI,t\) ::E'II) ;:+: 1 1- I..... ...... _ _ ColI "0 ~,w~ a'i3 :::T13 ,0 ,,0 0 0 0 c =: CD '1\.) :J li5 IOn (') (') n'" 0 o 1--< I 1" ïg ~ (/ 0 !o 0 0 0 þ :J () CD B.I " Q) " II) ~ !~ ~ ;;æ. ~ .... ñ) :J W :J fd :J 0 '0 (3 a ò 3 Q. ~ a. -I a. :;;: !(:;; Ñ Õ; ;: I~ CD ~ I~ I::!I I'" 'oJ ~ ii> 3(1) ~ :~ :::h :::h :::h 13 'c c ~ "- ~ ì ì I~ II~ ~ [ ~ .þ. IA W \,oJ ..... VI IVI W 0 VI ~ I~ ~ ~ ,0 o 0 0 0 0" " "::to IZ IZ IZ IZ IZ ., f¡) ¡to to to to f.. ftI S. IS. S. S. S. 0 ~ J; ~ m ª ~ O"QI~ '" I'" If) If) If) en S,; _ .t":'1 t":" t"I'1 t"I'1 t"I'1 -g _ 0 1:.0 :.0 ~ ;., '"0 (') 0 ;;C ¡Fe ~ Fe ~ ~ ~., ~ :- :- :- :- :-tIIO :!I - ;:·(J)m :¡;" " ..... f\) :r ~':' ~ ( ) C1I.þ..þ. '"0 ".....J CD «'ca- (Q ( ) CD C1I 0 W '-J f\) W ~.tII:._'< f\) 0 '-J '-J ()1 CD C» C1I <1>0 _01:. ftI ~<3 9 9 9 9 P 9 9 P .,:?_g ~ .þ. 0 f\) D 10 0 0 8· (II. 11. f\) W .þ. 0 iD D D <I> ~. m 5'('); ~ ~ co fie.....: ~ ~ t."ft."f t."f f\) t."f ell _(C:. f\) ..... '-J W Ilw CD w '-J -;; '< ( ) D f\) U1 '-J f\) f\) ....._ ~ nl);' 0.. ~: 3 -" ....;t -Ii "<I> ~~g ..~ C;. m ...., ", -t:'_~'z "... .. ü'I.ãJ: ... "-":':~ ).2-~/ ~ ' .._...~..._._.- -_._----_._-~----- - -\ ,-. ?,~i;' - .... tI .a '. Z"';Ë ~ Q W .~ Q vi "'''' ... g·ti~ "'!. U)~ N .... ... -'t'- ." ~ .... .!~ N .. Ñ E'tn "d" :¡:¡:o ... inP ~ '" >\'<>~ <0 .... N '" '" .... ."d' ;;; :;: ~ N g;¡ 0> <0 ;;; C) - In ... ... .. ... N ~VlC) Ñ GlOc C p~ .... W. 'ftII .,. (/) ".In 0 '" '" .,. N .,. U) 0 ~ 0 '" .,. '" c"'f 0 N 0 0 N ft:IC ~ ~ ,...: E">.:.: N ~~,.... ~;¡ft'-.:- .... 0 0 <0 0 .... Q '" N '" "' '" 0 U) Q ,r;n~ ~ N .... "'. '" '" ~S:C ri "" <Õ CO ..; s::> :: Q wtJ~ .... <= 0 .. ~ U - '" & 1....- i!J o U s:c& ~ !J ~ ~ _C(/) 0; " .. ".c '" " 0 i ~ u ~ :D u ~ . .5 '" E E . is 0 0. E oC. ~~. C .~~ É ~ ., ~ oC ;IID I - fj E -" 8¡=: '" C .. " ' -"I" '" C ~ 1 £j i - 8 - " o ~ E " c U .- " 1i ¡¡ '" i::l!2 1õ,.. - ~ -" Q)IOOI g " C U'_ ~I ~I " - .- .. 0 N :ßliil U c ~ .. a .s; C1 .. .. ", ~I~ @ r;¡:¡ ~I~ ~ ¡::: " 111 ~I "gl¡¡:: {J ~I ..~ . (/) c . ~III c .. ro ~ en o 0 0. w ~I~i .. 1; ~ g c ~ 1;1 U ", ::11= <{ :¡¡ -", ~ ~I o-:~ [(J' .. " u. 3:' E 3: U ' E " , ñi ~I~I 8 lr~ +:: ro '" .,. JJ 0' 0 'ti) gJ '" .!:J III ~ 0.1 .. ~Iil-g :ß ~I~ ~>~fI) c e cu. E . ~I . ~Ic ~ ~ ~ ~ .,. 0 ;I~I~ ~I -' .. '" " þ ~ "'18 ,~ ~I -I~I~ " IE 0 'ï ~ ~ ~ ái E g n iL o 3:1 ~I ,-' '§i n:¡; ~ el3: ~-I ~ ~ ~:;;I .n ¡:: Q) cp cp co ~ en bl~1 ~IÉI~ iLl 1Da>¡u.\.J... 0 <0 cr Nt..... ..- 0:::1 ('i (/)IN¡ a::: ::..c (( a::: (l 1 11); 0) c::::I('II,..!!!¡..... ~ N ..; ..¡ ..; .; ~ .; .,; ... ... ... ... ... ... ... '" I,,), -¥; - ---- ... ..._--_._-~--,,_._._._~_._-,_. ---,-- Attachment 2 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC ELIGmLE EQillPMENT/MANUFACTURERS LIST REVISION DATE: February 14, 1995 All ballast manufacturers contained herein have met both technical and "willingness to perform" requirements as of today. You are encouraged to conduct your own evaluation of the listed equipment/manufacturers. SDG&E does not endorse or approve the equipment/manufacturers for any purpose except eligibility for receiving incentives under SDG&E Demand Side Management programs. Most recent additions/changes are in shadowed boxes. I)'-'I:! - - ._~- - - -.- .- -_._.._,._~--.-_._._---~-_.....--~.__._-_... SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST FOUR-FOOT FLUORESCENT LAMPS GE LIGHTING T-S'S DESCRIPTION LUMENS LUMENS CATALOG WATTAGE INITIAL MEAN F32T8/SP30/RS 2S50 2508 15946 32 F32T8/SP35/RS 2850 2508 15947 32 F32T8/SP41/RS 2850 2508 15949 32 F32T8/SPX30 2950 2650 22655 32 F32T8/SPX35 2950 2650 22656 32 F32T8/SPX40 2950 2650 22657 32 F32T8/SPC50 /1\ 2800 2520 23460 32 OSRAM SYLVANIA T-S DESCRIPTION LUMENS LUMENS CATALOG WATTAGE INITIAL MEAN F032/730 2850 2508 21852 32 F032/735 2850 2508 21823 32 F032/741 2850 2508 21824 32 F032/750 (1\ 2650 2332 21809 32 F032/830 3000 2640 21923 32 F032/835 3000 2640 21924 32 F032/841 3000 2640 21924 32 PHilLIPS T-8's DESCRIPTION LUMENS LUMENS CATALOG WATTAGE INITIAL MEAN F32T8!TL730 2850 2600 32052-3 32 F32T8!TL735 2850 2600 32054-9 32 F32T8!TL741 2850 2600 32055-6 32 F32T8!TL830 3050 2850 31991-3 32 F32T8!TL835 3050 2850 31993-9 32 F32T8!TL841 3050 2850 31994-7 32 RJG:mjf EOUIP.LST 02/14/95 1.2 "II> 1 -----.-.-.-.-- -.- ---- ~.._. .__._---~----.._,-------,-- SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST EIGHT-FOOT FLUORESCENT LAMPS OSRAM SYLVANIA DESCRIPTION LUMENS LUMENS CATALOG WATTAGE INITIAL MEAN F096/730 5700 5016 21854 59 F096/735 5700 5016 21839 59 F096/741 5700 5016 21840 59 F096/830 6000 5280 21897 59 F096/835 6000 5280 21898 59 F096/841 6000 5280 21899 59 GE LIGHTING DESCRIPTION LUMENS LUMENS CATALOG WATTAGE INITIAL MEAN F96T8/SPX30 5950 5410 23414 59 F96T8/SPX35 5950 5410 23415 59 F96T8/SPX41 5950 5410 23416 59 F96T8/SP30 5800 5280 23407 59 F96T8/SP35 5800 5280 23411 59 F96T8/SP41 5800 5280 23412 59 DURO-TEST DESCRIPTION LUMENS LUMENS CATALOG WATTAGE INITIAL MEAN T-10 (265 mal. Aurora V (1) 2700 2376 1317 32 Footnote: (1 I This lamp does not meet minimum lumen output requirements. It is a special use lamp 80d can only be used with written permission of user. RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 j).--y¿, 2 . SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH EFFICIENCY BALLAST MANUFACTURERS ADVANCE TRANSFORMER CO. ELECTRONIC BALLASTS DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE RIC-140-TP 111161181191 RIC-2S40-TP (2) (61 tSI (8) VIC-14n-TP 11) ,e) 181191 VIC-2S40-TP I2J II!!) 181191 REL-3S40-TP 131161181191 VEL-3S40-TP 131181181181 RDC-1S40-TP 111161 RDC-2S40-TP 121161 VDC-1 S40-TP 111161 VDC-2S40-TP 12116] VEL-2S40-TP 121161 VEL-1S40-TP 111181 REL-2S40-TP 121 (61 REL-1S40-TP 111161 VIC-2S:!2-TP 12111'1171 VIC-3S40-TP 16116118119] VDC-3S40-TP 131181181181 VIC-3S32-TP (3) 181 17J VDC-3S32-TP (3) 161 171 RIC-2S32-TP 121161171 RIC-3S40-TP f3 (5) IS) (9) RDC-3S40-TP 13115) IS! IS} REL-3p::I2-TP 13) (61 f7) VEL-2P32-RH-TP 121161(7) REL-2P32-RH-TP (2) 161 (71 REL-3P32-RH-TP 131161171 REL-4P::I2-RH-TP 141161171 VIC-132-TP '1' 161 171 VEL-3P32-RH-TP 13 181 17) REL-2P60-S-RH- TP 12116111111121 VEL-4P32-RH-TP 4 IS) 171 ADVANCE TRANSFORMER CO. HYBRID BALLASTS DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE RK-2S34-TP 121161 (8) VK-2S34-TP 121181 (8) VK-2S40-TP 121161 RK-2S40-TP (2)16) VK-2S32-TP 121 (8) (7) RK-2S32-TP 121 (61 {7) RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 1.J.''7 3 --.--. ........ --.-. "... -'--'---"- SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH EFFICIENCY BALLAST MANUFACTURERS CANTERRA, INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL. INC. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE CND-120B-2L-T8/32 121161 I7J CND-277B-2L-T8/32 121181171 CND-120A-2L-T8/32 121 IS) I7J CND-277A-2L-T8/32 121(81171 ELECTRONIC BALLAST TECHNOLOGY, INC. (EBT) DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE SSB1-120-1/40LH 111161 (8) 19) SSB1-277-1/40LH 111181181191 SSB2-120-1/32ISLH (11161171 SSB2-277-1/32ISLH 111161 [71 SSB1-120-1/40LH It! (61 181 (9) SSB1-277-1/40LH 111 [61 [81 (9) SSB-1-120-2/40 12) 161 [SI IS} SSB-1 -1 20-3/40LH (31 (6) tS) III! SSB-1-277-3/40LH 131 ISI (8) (8) SSB-1-120-3/40 [31161 [81 (9) SSB-1-277-3/40 131181 (8) (81 SSB-2-120-4/32IS 141161(7) SSB-2-277-4/32IS (41[8]17) SSB2-120-2/32-IS-LH 121 15J 171 SSB2-277-2/32-IS-LH (2)181171 SSB2-120-3/32-IS-LH (3)161171 SSB2-277-3/32-IS-LH 131161 (7 SSB1-277-2/32-LH 121181(7) ECG-120/2/32 RS 121(61m ECG-277-2/32 RS (2)(81171 ECG-277-4/32 IP (4JIBlm ECG-120-4/32 IP 141 [61 [71 ELBA INTERNATIONAL, INC. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE ERP-232-L 121 [61 [7J EVP-232-L (2) BI (71 ERP-240-L 121151 IS! (9) ERS-240-N 12] 16) (8) (9) ERP-332-C 13116J(7) EVP-332-C 131161(71 ERP-432-C 14) (6) 17! EVP-432-C (41 161 m RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 );...,'/</ 4 SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH EFFICIENCY BALLAST MANUFACTURERS MAGNETEK (TRIAD) LIGHTING & ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS ELECTRONIC BALLASTS DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE 8240 R120 RH 12116111'181 8240 R120 HP 121161181191 8332 1277 HP 131181 f7 84321120 t41 IISI (7) 83321120 RH 131 161 I1ISI 8232 1277 RH 1211811151 8232 11'0 RH (2)161 (16) 8340 T120 1311SJ (81 lfilJ 8240 R277 RH 121181181 (9) 8232 1277 HP 121181171 8432 1277L 14 leI 111 8332 1277L 131181 (7J 83321120L 131 (61111 8232 1277L 121181111 8232 I POL 121161 t7I 83321120HP 131161 t7) 8332 1277HP 131161111 8432 1120HP 14]161111 84321120L 141[61(71 8432 1277HP 14) 181 171 8140T120RH ,""". 8140T277RH 8340RPOHP 131 161 ISI 8440SPR120HP 141161181 8440SPR277HP 4 181 181 84321120L 14) {6¡ m 84321277L 141161111 8140T277RH 11118118] 8240T277RH 121181181 83321120RH 131161171 B2321120HP 121 (61 171 8232R120HP 121161171 8232R277HP 121181(7) B332R120HP 131161111 8332R277HP 13tl81m " RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 'ì;.J/,. 5 ---.-..- --- ..--..---.--- ----- - -',-.,"." --...------,-. .'-.'__,_.___......___ _____·_··,·____~~__.._m___ SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH EFFICIENCY BALLAST MANUFACTURERS TMP.INC. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE FLD32F277-6 141181171 FLD32F120-6 (") 16) 171 FLD32T120-6 131 (51 171 FLD32T277-6 131 leI f7I FLD32D277-6 121161(7) FLD32D120-6 121161171 FLB40D120-6 (2) (5) 191 FLB40D277-6 121 ¡61(9) FLB32D120-6 121151171 FLB32D277-6 121 (6) 171 ANTRON (MERITEK) DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE TSD-140T12 121161191 TSD-1 40T8 12) (6) 171 GE LIGHTING GE MOTOROLA DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE M2-RN-T8-1 LL-120 (2) 16! 171 M2-RN-T8-1LL-277 111 (2) 16) 171 M2-RN-T12-1 LL-120 12116] (8) M2-RN- T12-1 LL-277 (2) tel 191 M3-RN-T8-1LL-120 (3) 161 17! M3-RN-T12-1 LL-277 13] Ie! (8) (9) M3-RN-T8-1 LL-277 (3)18)171 M4-RN-T8-1LL-277 (4)(6117) M2-RH-T8-1 LL-277 !2 181 m M2-RH-T8-1 LL-120 12116117] M2-RL-T8-1 LL-277 (21(6Im M2-IN-T8-277 (2)(6117) M2-IN-T8-120 12116] (7) M1-RN-T8-1 LL-120 t11t61t71 M1-RN-T8-1LL-277 (1) (8) 171 , RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 J",2 - 5'~ 6 SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH EFFICIENCY BALLAST MANUFACTURERS VALMONT ELECTRIC ELECTRONIC BALLASTS DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE E240SR 120 G01 1211&1 C81181 E240SR 277 G01 121161 ISI 191 E232SR 120 G01 121(61(71 E232SR 277 G01 (21 18J m E332 PI 120 13116)171 E332 PI 277 131 leI I7J E332 PI 120 G01 13116!!71 E332 PI 277 G01 13116!!71 E132 PI 120 G01 I1U6J17J E232 PI 120 G01 12)161171 E232 PI 277 G01 12118117) E232SR 120 G01 121161171 E140SR 120. GO 1 111 161 181 19J E340SR 120 G01 13116118119J E340SR 277 G01 13116] (8119J E132 PI 277 G01 I1J UII I7J E432 PI 120 141161171 E132PI120G01 111161171 E232Pl120GO 1 121 161 17J VALMONT ELECTRIC HYBRIO BALLASTS DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE M28-120 (2115118)(") M28-277 (21 Ie, 181 !III M28-120-3 13116] 18] 191 M28-277-3 131161 (81 (9) ROYCE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS, INC. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE 101-274 121161171 102·274 121161171 , /.1 "fI RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 7 '--~~--'-----""--'-'--"-' ..----'.------ SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH EFFICIENCY BALLAST MANUFACTURERS DENKI CORP. OF AMERICA DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE DE432P27 141181(7) DE432P12 141161171 DE332P12 131 r6) 171 DE332P27 131 161 17J DE232P12 121161171 DE232P27 l2J 181 !71 GOLDSTAR ELECTRONIC BALLASTS DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE GB-2X32/FL/I/120 121 (6) (71 GB-2X32/FL/I/277 12J 181 171 GB-3X32/FL/I/277 131181171 GB-3X32/FL/I/120 (3) (61 (7J GB-4X32/FI/I/120 (4116)171 GB-4X32/FL/I/277 141181171 GB-4X32/FL/I/120L (41161(7) USI LIGHTING, INC. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE P120-23RS 121161171 P277-23RS 121(6)(71 FULHAM ELECTRONICS, CO., LTD. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE FEP900 (2116)17) FEP900 121161171 FEP1200 121 (61 (7J . RJG:mjf EOUIP.LST 02/14/95 I)'''~ 8 SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH EFFICIENCY BALLAST MANUFACTURERS OSRAM-SYLVANIA DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE OT-2X32/120LP 1.21(6117) OT-2X32/277LP 121 UII 171 OT-3X32/120LP (3116) 171 OT-3X32/277LP 13118J 171 OT -4X32/120LP 141 (6) t7J OT-4X32/277LP 14J 18) 17} OT-2X32/1201S (2) (6) 171 OT-2X32/277IS 121 (6) (7 OT3X32/1201S 131151171 OT-3X32/277IS 131 (8) (7) OT-4X32/1201S 141 (6) 171 OT-4X32/277IS 141161 (7 KING TECHNOLOGY, INC. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE 232K120 12) 161 17) 232K277 121161171 240K120 12J(6 (8)t1J) 240K277 121161181191 232K120-75% 121161171 432K120-75% (4)(6J{7 240K2277 121181(8118) 432K277 14)(81171 232K2120 121161171 232K2277 (2)181171 232K120lS 12U61171 232K277IS 12H8117J 132K120 I1H6H'! RJG:mjf EOUIP.LST 02/14/95 1-'-'.>' :J 9 ^-~-,_._._-- SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH-EFFICIENCY BALLASTS MANUAFACTURERS MTI INTERNATIONAL DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE MB-232-120-RS-TBM t.21161 (7 MB-232-277-RS-TBM 121181171 MB-332-120-RS-TBM t3H6H71 MB-332-277-RS-TBM 131(6)171 MB-432-277-RS-TBM 14116!!71 MB-432-277-RS-TBM (4HeIl7) AROMA T CORPORATION DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE E1321120H2 11J(6JI7! E1321277H2 (1)(6)171 EP2321120H2 (2)(5)171 EP2321277H2 12)181171 EP3321120H2 (3) 16) 171 EP3321277H2 131(61171 EP4321120H2 (4J (6) (7) EP4321277H2 (4118) (7) LEP4321120H2 (4¡ 161 m LEP4321277H2 141t61171 ES232R120H2 (2) (6117) ES232R277H2 (2) Ie) t7J ES332R120H2 (3116)(7) ES332R277H2 13J (61 171 LES232R120H2 121161171 LES232R277H2 (2J (6) (7) LES332R120H2 131 16J m LES332R277H2 t3t 161171 ES240R120H2 (2) (6) ISI ES240R277H2 121161(9\ RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 1.2....5~ 10 SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH-EFFICIENCY EIGHT-FOOT LAMP BALLASTS ADVANCE TRANSFORMER CO. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE REL-2P75-S-RH-TP 1211611121 VEL-2E75-S-RH-TP 1211611121 REL-25110-RH-TP 121161(131114) VEL-25110-RH-TP 1211811131(141 VEL-2P59-5-RH-TP 111121(811181 REL-2P59-5-RH-TP 11112116111111 ADVANCE TRANSFORMER CO. HYBRID BALLASTS DESCRIPTION ··RKMfjjö;itaU¡¡n wnw;: VK¥~$jlQ¡mpi¡1M@Wg¡Mi . .... ...... ... ELECTRONIC BALLAST TECHNOLOGY (EBT) DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE 5581-120-2-96-HO-LH 1211611131 5581-277-2-96-HO-LH 121 US] (13) 5582-120-2-9615-LH 1211611t1) 5582-277-2-9615-LH 121181 '111 ECG-120-2/96 IP 12116111111121 ECG-277-2/96 IP 121 ISI 11'11121 5582-120-1/9615 LH 111 161 11111121 5582-277-1/9615 LH 111 leI 1"] 1121 GE LIGHTING GE MOTOROLA DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE M2-1 N-T12-5L-120 12) 161 1121 M2-' L-TB-BFT-120 12116111111 MAGNETEK (TRIAD) LIGHTING & ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE 82601120RH 1211611111 82601277RH 12)(8""1 82955R120L 12H6H131 82955R277L 121(8)(13] 82955R120 (2116)(131 82955R277 1211611131 82591120HP (11 !21 16) (9) 82591277HP 111121181(19) 82591120HPL I1J 121 161191 82591277HPL 111 (2) leI "8) RJG:mjf EOUIP.L5T 02/14/95 1.2 -5'5' 11 " , ______________.m , ...__,._____~.___ SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH-EFFICIENCY EIGHT-FOOT LAMP BALLASTS VALMONT DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE E296P1277G01 (2) 181 (121 E296PI120G01 12115J 1121 E296SH120G11 121 {61 {131114] E296SH277G11 12111511131 {14J E296PI120G11 {21 (6111111121 E296PI277G 11 1211611111112J E296FOPl120G01 1211611181 E296FOPI277G01 1211611191 OSRAM-SYLVANIA DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE OT-2X59/120IS 11112)(51(19) OT-2X59/277IS 111(2116)119] OT-2X96/120IS (2116)1"11121 OT-2X96/277IS 121(8J11'1I12) OT-2X96/120HO (2)(611131114J OT-2X96/277HO 12Jt6J113H14¡ AROMAT CORPORATION DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE EP2591120H2 (21(6)[19) EP2591277H2 12116J!191 EP2751120H2 121\6H121 EP2751277H2 12)181112) ES2110R120-HO 12!!6H141 ES2110R277-HO 121!8H14] KING TECHNOLOGY, INC. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE . (2116)(111112) 296K2-120 296K 120-T8 12)(61119) TMP, INC. . DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE FLD59D120-6 (2H6)(191 FLD59D277-6 (2)l8jI19) RJG:mjf EOUIP.LST 02/14/95 1.2 "'f~ 12 . SDG&E ELlGI!3LE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH-EFFICIENCY TWO-FOOT LAMP BALLASTS Two-Foot, 17-W, T-B Electronic Ballasts ADVANCE TRANSFORMER DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE REL-3P32-TP 11112113116H161 REL-3P32-RH- TP 131 (611161 REL-4P32-RH-TP 1311-411611161 REL-1 P32-RH-TP 11) (6) 116J VEL-1 P32-RH-TP 111 lei 1161 REL-2P32-RH-TP 111121(61116) VEL-2P32-RH-TP 111121[611161 VEL-3P32-RH-TP 111121[31181(16) VEL-4P32-RH-TP 1211311411611161 MAGNETEK (TRIAD) DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE 82321120 RH 121 leI (161 82321277RH ..... Ii 12,18,".,\ 83321277 HP 1311811161 83321120 RH 1311611161 83321120 HP 131 (61 (161 VALMONT DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE E217PI120G01 (2) 1611161 E217P1277G01 121181 (16) MOTOROLA DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE M1-RN-TB-1 LL-120 111 161 1161 M1-RN-TB-1LL-277 111 181 [16J M2-RN-TB-1 LL-120 121 [6J 1161 M2-RN-TB-1 LL-277 121 (61 (16) EaT DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE SS82-120-2/17-IS-LH 121 (6) !16J SS82-277-2/17-IS-LH 121 (81116) TMP,INC. DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE FL817D120-6 121 [61 [16J FL817D277-6 121 [81 (16) RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 /.2".£'l 13 ------ __m_ o· ._.__._~._____._".___. SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH-EFFICIENCY TWO-FOOT LAMP BALLASTS Two-Foot. 32-W. T-8. U-Bend Electronic Ballasts ADVANCE TRANSFORMER DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE RIC-140-TP (1116111151 VIC-140-TP 111 li!llIHU REL-3P32-TP 11112113116111151 RIC-2S40-TP (2) (6) t11!1J RIC-2S32-TP e21 16J 1161 VIC-2S40-TP 121 t611tS! VIC-2S32-TP 121181 t11!1J REL-4P32-RH-TP «I.) 161 118) VEL-4P32-RH-TP «I.I18J ¡'51 MAGNETEK TRIAD DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE 82321120 1111211611181 82321277 111121181 (HI) 83321120 131 {51 nel 83321120HP (3) Ui} {161 83321277HP 131 leI 1161 84321120HP {4] (61 (HI) 84321277HP 1411811181 V ALMONT ELECTRONIC DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE E232SR120G01 121 (61 1181 E232SR277G01 121 t81 (16) E332Pl120 121131 (6) 11!1J E332P1277 121(3) (S) (16) E332PI120G01 (21131161 (HI) E332PI277G01 12J13}t81 118] E432Pl120 131 (4) 16) IHI) E432P1277 131 t4J (8) (16) RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 J). ->,Y 14 SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH-EFFICIENCY TWO-FOOT LAMP BALLASTS Two-Foot, 32-W, T-B, U-Bend Electronic Ballasts MOTOROLA DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE M1-RN-T8-1ll-120 1111611181 M1-RN-T8-1ll-277 1111811181 M2-RN-T8-1ll-120 121 (6) 1e¡ M2-RN-T8-1ll-277 1211811181 M3-RN-T8-1ll-120 131 (611181 M3-RN-T8-1ll-277 1311811181 M4-RN- T8-1ll-120 141 161 (18J M4-RN-T8-1 Ll-277 (4) 18J IHII M2-RN-T8-10C-120 121 161 171 120J M2-RN-T8-10C-277 t21181 C711201 EST DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE SSB2-120-1/32-IS-lH 11J (51 (HI) SSB2-277-1/32-IS-lH 111 18111S1 SSB2-120-2/32-IS-lH 1211611181 SSB2-277-2/32-IS-lH 121181118J SSB2-120-3/32-IS-lH 131161 (18) SSB2-277-3/32-IS-lH (31 181 118¡ SSB2-120-4/32-IS-lH 14J 161 '181 SSB2-277-4/32-IS-lH (4J (81 1181 Two-Foot, Twin Tube. F40. Biax Ballasts ADVANCE TRANSFORMER DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE RIC-140-TP 1111611171 VIC-140-TP 111(8) 1171 RIC-2S40-TP 121 (61 (17) VIC-2S40-TP 1211811171 RIC-2S32-TP 1211611181 VIC-2S32-TP 1211811181 RJG:mjf EQUIP.lST 02/14/95 J).,>, 15 ~--_.__..-- --....-.- -~ . . " -,._....._----_._.._--,..__.~ -....-.-------.--- SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST HIGH-EFFICIENCY TWO-FOOT LAMP BALLASTS Two-Foot, Twin Tube, F40, Biax Ballasts MAGNATEK TRIAD DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE B2321120 121161 (171 1181 82321277 12118111711181 82321120 111 (6) {18J 82321277 1111811181 83321120 1311511171 (181 83321277HP (3) 161 1171 (18) VALMONT DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE E232PI120G01 121 {51 (18) E232P1277G01 i21 161 (18) EBT DESCRIPTION FOOTNOTE 5581-277-2/40TTLH (2118) 1171 75% 5581-120-2/40 TTLH 121 (6J (171 75% Footnotes (1 lOne Lamp (2) Two Lamps (3) Three Lamps 14J Four Lamps 151 120V 161 277V (71 32-W Lomp (T-BI (BI 34-W Lomp (91 40-W Lomp 1101 36·W Lomp 1111 60·W Lomp 1'2) 75·W Lamp 1131 95-W Lomp 1141 110-W Lomp 1151 17-W. T-B Lomps (16) 32-W. T·e U-Bend Lamps {171 39·W. T·5. Biox (1 BI 40-W. T·5. Biax 1191 59-2. T -B. B-FT Lomp 1201 Dimming ballast to RJG:mjf EQUIP.L5T 02/14/95 J.J.,;//P 16 SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST REFLECTIVE MATERIAL MANUFACTURERS/DISTRIBUTORS Amalco Metals, Inc. Amberlite III anodized aluminum Superb rite anodized aluminum Clark Metals, Inc. Alcoa Everbrite anodized aluminum Dielectric Coating Industries OM-94 enhanced aluminum Martin Processing, Inc. Limelight silver film Metal Center, Inc. Metalloxyd anodized aluminum Prefinished Metals, Inc. Alumolite film Specular + silver film 3M Silverlux silver film REFLECTOR MANUFACTURERS 11} 121 A.loP. Lighting & Ceiling Products Optek Design & Manufacturing American IIluminetics Parke Industries Brydenscot Metals Parrish Lighting C.D. Alexander, Inc. Precision Reflector Deigns Diamond Specular Ptoducts Reflect-A-Light, Inc. Eagle Lighting Reflective Light TechnologiesfThermax Company Economic Lighting Technologies, Inc. Ryan Lighting Group Envirolite Reflectors (Energy Planning Assoc.) Silverlight Energy Products Harris Manufacturing, Inc. SISCO Incand Kilowatt Saves, Inc. (KSI) Sundown Lighting Associates KW/2 Lighting Products I Solar Kinetics US Reflectors ML Systems Well made (R300 Retro-Liner Series Only) More Light 1 st Source Lighting RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 /2.-&/ 17 _....._ ..__·_'·_~_.._"U .-.-. -".-.-.-- _n... ..._.....___....-___....,,_._. SDG&E ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT LIST LUMINAIRE MANUFACTURERS 12' American 1IIuminetics Columbia Lighting Cooper Lighting/Metalux Daybrite Lighting, Inc. Eastern Fixture Company, Inc. Genlyte Lightolier KLP Lithonia Parke Industries Prudential Lighting 1 st Source Lighting FOOTNOTES (1) ACCEPTABILITY HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON PRE-INSTALLATION AGREEMENT AND WARRANTY. (2) LISTED MANUFACTURERS HAVE AT LEAST ONE PRODUCT LINE MEETING SDG&E SPECIFICATIONS. (3) BALLASTS IN ACCEPTABLE LUMINAIRES SHOULD COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF SDG&E's DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT LIGHTING EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION AND BE SELECTED FROM THE LIST OF ACCEPTABLE EQUIPMENT. (4) ALL REFLECTORS SUPPLIED BY THE APPROVED MANUFACTURERS MUST COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT REVISION OF SDG&E's LIGHTING EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION #TS-0003. NOTE: (1) INCLUSION ON THIS LIST DOES NOT ATTEST TO SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE, BUT ONLY THAT LlSTEO ITEMS, IF INSTALLED AND USED PROPERLY, SHOULD NOT CONTRIBUTE TO UNSAFE OPERATING CONDITIONS NOR ADVERSELY AFFECT POWER QUALITY OF THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. You ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONDUCT YOUR OWN EVALUATION OF THE LISTED EQUIPMENT/MANUFACTURERS. SDG&E DOES NOT ENDORSE OR APPROVE THE EQUIPMENT/MANUFACTURERS FOR ANY PURPOSE EXCEPT ELIGIBILITY FOR RECEIVING INCENTIVES UNDER SDG&E DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS. NOTE: (2) SDG&E's LIST OF ELIGIBLE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS IS UPDATED ON A CONTINUING BASIS. IF A PIECE OF EQUIPMENT IS NOT INCLUDED ON THIS LIST, BUT SHOULD BE, PLEASE CONTACT EITHER BILL DAIBER (654-1202) OR BOB GILLESKIE (654-1152). RJG:mjf EQUIP.LST 02/14/95 1.2 ' ¿,;.. 18 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. /3 Meeting Date 3/14/95 J7tr ;JJ ITEM TITLE: Resolution Establishing City Council Policy for Delegating Additional Authority to staff and the Safety Commission SUBMITIED BY: 1m""" '" ,""lic wo,~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~J (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No X) Council Referral: 1267. 2557 The City Council has expressed a desire to have staff and the City Attorney work with the members of the Safety Commission in developing a process that would provide greater authority to staff and the Safety Commission in dealing with traffic safety issues. The intent of the City Council policy is to eliminate the need for minor day to day issues related to the operations aspect of Traffic Engineering going before the City Council, and have staff and the Safety Commission as the final decision making authority. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt this resolution establishing a policy for delegating authority to staff and the Safety Commission and direct staff and the City Attorney to raft the changes to the Municipal Code as necessary to implement this policy. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: At the November 10, 1994 meeting of the Safety Commission, the commission discussed a draft of the Safety Commission Policy and advised staff to proceed with the necessary action to achieve getting the policy approved. DISCUSSION: The City Council has previously expressed an interest in improving the processing of traffic improvement citizen requests and providing shorter response time in resolving traffic issues. The City Council felt that this could be accomplished by delegating greater authority to the Safety Commission in dealing with such matters. At a workshop meeting with the Safety Commission, the City Council requested the Safety Commission solicit and formulate ideas on developing a policy which would delegate greater authority to the Safety Commission. As an outgrowth of this meeting, staff was directed to develop a Council Policy to carry out this objective. Traffic Engineering staff, with consultation from the City Attorney, developed several policy options. These policy options were presented to the Safety Commission on several occasions to solicit a consensus on how to accomplish the City Council's objective. Utilizing information provided by the Safety Commission, and advice from the City Attorney's office, staff produced the attached Safety Commission policy. This policy, which is presented for Council's consideration, establishes an administrative procedure for the Safety Commission and the City Engineer on the procedures of conducting public hearings on matters related to traffic and safety issues. The policy also prescribes guidelines and criteria for processing and acting upon citizen requests for traffic improvements. 13"'/ v Page 2, Item I:J Meeting Date: 3/14/95 To summarize, the intent of the policy is to delegate to the City Engineer and the Safety Commission authority to implement vehicular and pedestrian traffic control measures, requested by citizens or initiated by staff and/or the Commission. The proposed policy would encompass Trial Traffic Regulations, Stop Signs, Yield Signs, Parking Restrictions and Loading Zones, Bicycle and Pedestrian Regulations, and Permit Parking in Residential Zones. Final actions on matters requiring an Ordinance from the City Council such as Speed Regulations, Angle Parking, Parking Meter Zones, Permit Parking, and Truck Routes are exempt from this policy. These latter items will be referred to the City Council with recommendations from staff and the Safety Commission for final disposition as is presently done. Specifically, the policy if adopted would delegate to the City Engineer and Safety Commission authority to implement certain traffic control improvements without the need to obtain final approval from the City Council. The Safety Commission will either approve or deny the request presented in the City Engineer's report. If the Safety Commission, by a majority vote, affirms the City Engineer's recommendation to approve the citizen's traffic safety request, staff is authorized to implement the traffic safety improvement without a resolution from the Council. If the Safety Commission, by a majority vote, affirms the City Engineer's recommendation to deny the citizen's traffic safety improvement request, the denial is final and will not be forwarded by staff to the City Council for their consideration unless one member of the Council within 10 days desires to hear the item. This is consistent to certain actions for minor CUP's. Staff will notify the Council of the Safety Commission hearing results through the forwarding of an information memo outlining the action taken. Appeals to the City Council from decisions of the Safety Commission or City Engineer are a priority and will normally be scheduled for hearing 3 to 4 weeks from the date the appeal is filed. The policy also sets forth a procedure to deal with situations where the City Engineer and the Safety Commission do not agree on what traffic improvement, if any, should be pursued. If the Safety Commission's vote is contrary to the City Engineer's recommendation, the traffic item will be referred to the City Council, unless the City Engineer changes his/her recommendation to concur with the Safety Commission. After conducting a public hearing, during which time the applicant and interested parties may speak, the City Council may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the request. The City Council's decision is final. The policy also provides that the Commission shall not have the power to initiate or order the implementation of a traffic control measure, but shall have the authority to recommend to the City Engineer that s/he consider a proposed traffic control measure. If the City Engineer declines to implement a traffic control measure proposed by the Safety Commission, the Safety Commission shall, by a vote of at least four of the seven commissioners, have the ability to refer the matter to the City Council. Based on the foregoing, staff and the City Attorney request that the City Council approve the Safety Commission Policy presented with this resolution, and direct staff and the City Attorney to draft the required Municipal Code changes necessary to implement the attached policy. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of this policy will have a non-quantifiable savings in staff and Council time by cutting down on the number of items which will go to the Council for action. Attachments: Exhibit A Draft Policy Exhibit B Minutes from Joint Council/Safety Commission 2/27/92 Exhibit C Safety Commission/City Council Policy Meeting Notes Dated 6/21/94 13....~ "...~._----- _~_"_r'_____'___'_'_ _ _" ~ n_____ _..,..~._-_._..- __m_____u_ ... Page 3, ItemQ Meeting Date: 3/14/95 í ~ , Exhibit D Existing Safety Commission Policy #110-09 . t ('- Exhibit E Proposed Amendments C. Y Municipal Code Title 10 ¡ V .' Exhibit F Flow Chart for Citizen Complaints, New Safety Commission Policy J'" Exhibit G Memo to City Attorney Requesting Assistance with Safety Commission Policy Exhibit H Minutes from Safety Commission Meetings Regarding New Safety Commission Policy (Excerpts) File No: KY-119/KY-158 M:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\SAFEPOL2.FXR /3"3 ...-.---,." - _n' _._~.._.._ _ __.____._______ __._..._._______ -----..- . -,---_.~_.- -.------..-------.-.---'-- RESOLUTION NO. 17 ~:J:J RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL POLICY FOR DELEGATING ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO STAFF AND THE SAFETY COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City council has expressed a desire to have staff and the City Attorney work with the members of the Safety Commission in developing a process that would provide greater authority to staff and the Safety Commission in dealing with traffic safety issues; and WHEREAS, the intent of the City Council policy is to eliminate the need for minor day to day issues related to the operations aspect of Traffic Engineering going before the city Council, and have staff and the Safety Commission as the final decision making authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby establish City Council Policy for delegating additional authority to staff and the Safety Commission as set forth in Exhibit "A". Presented by t form by i John P. Lippitt, Director of City Public Works c: \ rs\safety .pol IY"¥ .___u._,.··,.__~.~____·_·___·..···_· ,_,__ -. """--'--~'---"-'---'--"---' ___..___ ~__.__..__._.____~____~_.__ .... n__" E)(~i. bi + A ' ~#=I.3 COUNCIL POLICY CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: POLICY EFFECTIVE Safety Commission Policy NUMBER DATE PAGE 1 ADOPTED BY: I DATED: BAa<GROUND On March 6, 1973, the City Council adopted a Safety Commission policy establishing a procedure to be followed by the Safety Commission in evaluating matters of vehicular or pedestrian safety within the public right-of-way within the City of Chula Vista. The March 6, 1973 policy limits the Safety Commission responsibility to an advisory role to the City Council. Presently, final authority to implement traffic control. measures rests with the City Council. in recent years there has been a greater awareness and concern over traffic and safety related issues. Due to population, vehicular ownership, and traffic growth in the City, this awareness and concern has resulted in an increase in traffic items brought before the City Council. This situation coupled with other pressing demands on the City Council has adversely impacted their ability to schedule public hearings and resolve the high number of traffic and safety matten initiated by the public that warrant special consideration. Due to the importance placed on traffic and safety matters and the need to deal with such matters expeditiously, the City Council has determined a need to create an ..!mini.trative process in which delegation of authority is empowered to the Safety Commission and staff to act upon traffic and safety matters. This policy replaces POUCY NUMBER 110-09 ADOPJ'ED 03·06-73 BY RESOLtmON #6772. ~ J}. -y- -.-.--.-.,-.,-----"'--"- ... ----~..,"---.._-_..__._-_.~--_._._. COUNCIL POLICY · CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: POLICY EFFECTIVE Safety Commission Policy NUMBER DATE PAGE 2 ADOPTED BY: DATED: · PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to establish an administrative procedure for the Safety Commission to conduct public hearings on matten related to traffic and safety issues. This policy prescribes guidelines and criteria for determining appropriate actions in accordance with City Council directions and delegation of authority. 1. GENERAL POLICY It shall be the policy of the City, to be implemented by such ordinances and resolutions as may be required, that, within, the budgetary constraints set by Council through the budget, the City Council hereby delegates · authority to establish and maintain vehicular and pedestrian traffic control measures, standards, and requirements in the public right of way ("Traffic Control Measures"), except as hereinbelow provided, to the City Engineer after review by the Safety Commission ("Commission"), unless, on affirmative vote of a m~ority of the membership of the Safety Commission, the Commission objects to the proposed action by the City Engineer. In such case, the matt~r shall be referred to the City Council and the authority as to such matten, shall, on such referral, be vested in the City Council to be exercised on on the affirmative vote of three memben of the City Council. The Commission shall not have the power to initiate or order the implementation of a Traffic Control Measure, but shall have the power to recommend to the City Engineer that s/he consider a proposed Traffic Control Measure. If the City Engineer shall consider and decline to implement a Traffic Control Measure proposed by a majority of the Commission. the Commission shall by a vote of at least four (4) Commissionen have the power to refer the matter to the City Council, and upon such referral. the authority to initiate and order the Traffic Control Measure shall be thereupon revested in the City Council. 2. EXCEPTIONS: A. Traffic Control Measures budgeted by the City as a Capital Improvement Project Budget. The authority to establish a Traffic Control Measure for which the City has appropriated funds in the City's ClP budget shall be vested in the City Council, subject to recommendations of the City Engineer and Safety Commission. ~ J) ;-þ COUNCIL POLICY CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: POLICY EFFECI'IVE Safety Commission Policy NUMBER DATE PAGE 3 ADOPTED BY: DATED: B. Special Event Regulations (1) Public Community Events. The authority to establish and maintain Traffic Control Measures for community events using the public right-of-way. (2) Road Construction Projects. The authority to establish and maintain temporary Traffic Control Measures for road construction projects shall be vested in the City Engineer, unless overruled by the affirmative vote of three memben of the Council. The City Engineer shall, under the following circumstances, advise the Council seven days in advance in writing of the following proposed Traffic Control Measures exercised under the authority of this exception: (a) the proposed Traffic Control Measure may involve complete road closures on any road: (b) the proposed Traffic Control Measure may involve significant interference with traffic on high volume roads; (c) the proposed Traffic Control Measure may involve long term partial road closures on any road; (d) the proposed Traffic Control Measure may involve interference with access to any business; (e) the proposed Traffic Control Measure may involve the rerouting of traffic through residential areas. C. Emergency Traffic Regulations. D. Traffic Control Measures Affecting Community Businesses. The City Council reserves authority over all Traffic Control Measures designed to, or having an impact on, the availability of parking for businesses, including but not limited to: ~ J]-? "...-.-_'~ -----"---,-_._--,...._._...._---,,..._-~-_.._.,~-- COUNCIL POLICY · CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: POLICY EFFECTIVE Safety Commission Policy NUMBER DATE PAGE 4 ADOPTED BY: DATED: (1) Angle Parking · (2) Parking Meters E. Traffic Control Measure associated with new developments and/or City projects. 3. INCLUSIONS A- Trial Traffic Regulations Chapter 10.12 Traffic Control Devices Chapter 10.24 · Through Streets and Stop Intersections Chapter 10.32 Yield Right-of-Way Streets Chapter 10.36 Turning Movements Chapter 10.40 One-Way Streets and Alleys Chapter 10.44 Stopping, Standing and Parking Chapter 10.52 (Except Angle Parking) Loading Zones Chapter 10.60 Bicycle Parking Zones Chapter 10.72 Pedestrians Chapter 10.76 Pennit Parking in Residential Zones Chapter 10.86 Final actions on matters requiring an Ordinance from City Council regarding Speed Regulations (Chapter 10.48); Angle Parking (Chapter 10.52); Parking Meter Zones (Chapter 10.56); Permit Parking (Chapter 10.56) and Truck Routes (Chapter 10.64) shall be exempt from this policy. These items will be referred to the City Council with recommendations from staff and the Safety Commission for final disposition. PROno-°IJRES A. PUBUC INQUlRlES 1. Citizen requests for traffic and safety related improvements are submitted to the City Engineer for evaluation. 2. The City Engineer ped'orms traffic studies as necessary including the collection of pertinent data and any other reference material. .)H( /Y-JY COUNCIL POlJCY Cl'IY OF CHUlA VISTA SUBJECT: POLICY EFFECI'IVE Safety Commi'~on Policy NUMBER DATE PAGE 5 ADOPTED BY: DATED: 3. The City Engineer analyzes the traffic data and makes a traffic engineering determination on what, if any, traffic engineering improvements are needed. 4. The City Engineer prepares a report to the Safety Commission presenting his/her findings accompanied with a recommendation to accept or deny the citizen's traffic safety improvement request. S. The City Engineer's report is placed on the Safety Commission's meeting agenda. 6. Citizen and other affected individuals are notified of the date when their item will appear before the Safety Commission. Notices are sent out not later than six clays before the Safety Commission meeting. 7. The Safety Commission conducts a public hearing, where staff presents their recommendation to deny or approve the citizen's traffic safety improvement request to the Safety Commission. 8. The Safety Commission, by a majority vote of the Safety Commission, makes a determination based on established Council policies, the l!'IunicipaJ Code, the Califomia Vehicle Code, and standard traffic engineering practices to concur with or disagree with the City Engineer's report to approve or reject the citizen's traffic safety improvement request. a. If the Safety Commission vote affirms the City Engineer's recommendation to approve the citizen's traffic safety improvement request, staff is authorized to implement the traffic safety improvement. b. If the Safety Commission, by a majority vote of the Safety Commission, affirms the City Engineer's recommendation to deny the citizen's traffic safety improvement request, the denial is final and will not be forwarded by staff to the City Council for , their consideration unless one member of the Council within 10 days desires to hear the item. Staff will notify Council of the Safety Commission hearing results through ~ /J~J ~_._.__.,--,._._--- ___._____"....nm ___.._._ u.,,_____ COUNCIL POLICY CITY OF CHULA VISTA · SUBJECT: POLICY EFFECTIVE Safety Commission Policy NUMBER DATE PAGE 6 ADOPTED BY: DATED: the fOIWarding of an information memo outlining the action taken. Appeals to the · City Council from decisions of the Safety Commission or City Engineer are a priority and will normally be scheduled for a hearing 3 to 4 weeks from the date the appeal is filed. After conducting a public hearing, during which time the applicant and interested parties may speak, the Council may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the request. The City Council's decision is final. c. If the Safety Commission's vote is contrary to the City Engineer's recommendation, the traffic item will be refelTed to the City Council and the authority as to such · matten shall, on such refelTal, be vested in the City Council to be exercised on the affirmative vote of three memben of the City Council. The Commission shall not have the power to initiate or order the implementation of a Traffic Control Measure, but shall have the power to recommend to the City Engineer that s/he consider a . proposed Traffic Control Measure. If the City Engineer shall consider and decline to implement a Traffic Control Measure proposed by a majority of the Safety Commission, the Commission shall, by a vote of at least four (4) Commissionen, have the power to refer the matter to the City Council, and upon such referral, the , authority to initiate and order the Traffic Control Measure shall be thereupon vested in the City Council. If new information or evidence presented at the hearing discloses that the original recommendation is no longer valid, the City Engineer may take an item off the City Council Agenda and concur with the Safety Commission's recommendation thus waiving the appeal process. B. TRAFFIC PLANNING 1. Any precise plans or site plans for the construction of buildings or facilities that are proposed to be built adjacent to or having access to or impact on major streets which, in the opinion of staff (i.e. Director of Planning, Director of Public Works, or City Engineer) I!!!!I in light of the ~ J:J~Jt7 · COUNCIL POLICY CI1Y OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: POLICY EFFECfIVE Safety Commission Policy NUMBER DATE PAGE 7 ADOPTED BY: DATED: plans submitted create the potential for a hazardous condition which m!!Y have a detrimental effect on vehicular or pedestrian traffic, will be forwarded, through the City Engineer, to the Safety Commission for review, evaluation, and recommendations. 2. The Safety Commission shall evaluate said precise plans and site plans in reference to their effect upon traffic problems, and shall submit their recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council at the time such plans are considered by said bodies. 3. Trial Traffic Regulation, Municipal Code 10.12.030 . In cases where authority has been delegated to the Safety Commission and City Engineer to approve traffic control devices, the Safety Commission will hereby be authorized to approve the installation with the concurrence of the City Engineer's recommendation. 4. The Safety Commission will adopt a recommendation embodying such regulation. or any part thereof, after the 8-month ttial period or which regulation shall cease to be effective. Where an ordinance is required for final approval. the Safety Commission will forward their recommendation to the City Council for adoption of the ordinance embodying such regulation. ",,~----poI 110794 ~ ;')//1 d ___.__. ,..._.." .__.___.,__."w__n -,,--- · · · - This Page Blank - µ JJ~/~ . MiDutet .,.bnwy 'Z1.1992 £xhibit "B ,.,.2 ~ D: CoIIIuIIaDt....bUIb detailed deÅp me!lptclficltion for Ibe GIS system tIDeS far 1be IIue map ..-.....MII aDd database tItftIopIDtI1L Develop prveedura and . criœria far Þ-u'......-t 1IIIt far1be.,nem. l!nI\late ...., I -I. me!1IeIIcIIIIwb UId aøist III 1be lIIectiozI vI1be GIS .,mm WDdor. cnl\1ate ....., -I. UId aøist in Ibe Mlectiou of ...., __ IDC!~. ...... !IF lilt- ~ .-. - .-. me!1J*IfY ~ nqIIb....- .. Wcøt ...., wizb .-u!1aDt _ 111 .mer.... .. lØ'ect a ~....,. vi mowIecI¡e. T I. · -= 140.000 ..... MQvr Nad.. called a bruit at 5:15 'p.m. with Ibe llleetinl nconvenln¡at 5:22 p.lII. Coundbnan 1lIndone Ad McauM be bad anoth.. _=1 to attend. ..... I. ØNf MEmNG OF an' CXMJNaL AND IAPE1Y COMMISSION COUNaLMEMBDS PRESENT: Malcolm, Moore. aøð Mayw Nader ABSENT: Gruttr Horton, Rindone . IAF!1Y COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: ,aðIIla. Chidester. Pita. 1Coesttr. MII.da, aøð VIa QaIr'1'bollw ABSENT: QaIr Braden . , ...,. ...... ...... aeedDI. He ItateCllbat . purpMt of. 1IIHIinI- .. miew TraIIic Saf.ty --. VIa Cbûr 'Ibomu ltated lbat a lot of 1bt ,.-...IHIoDm .... MW ancI UllSIIft of 1beIr rol.. Thtrt were ....._-.dIat dMJ ha4: 1. DIrtctioII vl1dIat. ~ would lib 1beIII" do; aøð a. 0Nra11 ~._.... of 1be Safety ('-...Ic,lon. c... l-"-- Malco1III Ita. lbat aon vi . dill., CoIIIIdI .._...41 1bt SafttJ ('--Ion's tltdslona. .. CIIIM vi lbat be felt eometbInI- wrODI. CoIIIIdIIIIIbI political dtdIIou. me! McauM vi 1bt political ..-un. be felt people Ibou1d DOt appeal.. 1bt City Coundl.. 'lb. only dIIIt anyIhIII¡ Ibou1d come to Ibe CouDdllI wballben II a dMIIon ktwlen IIIIf UId 1bt SlfttJ CI II 1··Iou. 'Ibtn it could be appeaI.d to .. CiIJ ONr"n , ...,....... aabd 1bt ~...IHIOII what _. nlationabip bttwltl11be ('--101I me!1IIIf and Ifthe . o--l.ÄOIIItIft.d with Ibe prtl\llllption lbat ItaIf _ rl¡ht? He dllall'"d with Cow-"""'an Mllcolm btœ'lllt III fait Ilia deciliOftl .... DOt political. . ;B-< /3//3 . - .._._'"._..._-.._,-_._.....__._._---~--_._--_.._._.~~- Minutes . ..bruary 27,1992 'ale 3 00 · Vice Chair Thomu stated their position wu an advisory position of a lot of lay people. They did Dot rubber IWIIp autl's recomm.ndation, He ftlt they took the lay infol'lDation from the peopl. aild aied to balance ir with die u:perience of ,taff. CommiIIioDer 'a4i1la stat.d that b. doem't remember a time when ItI!I'recommended the citizen', request. He felt that I! the Commission had the final NY In matten that Council would be IhIftin¡ Council's rapoIIIibility to die Commission. Then they would be facJna the political d.cilloDl. ColØlcllman Malcolm ftlt that be did Dot haw the time to wit each Int,"ection. He wu IooIåDI for a _plOmbe; a way to ¡lYe more rapoDlibility to the CommiIIlon. 'or _pie, I! the ('...,'....I.slon felt that Ibe warrant I)'Ittm _ WTODI. then they Ibould cbanJe It. · Commiaioner Chidater stated iIIl'WI')' inltance the It&!!' 1.11II _ backward to '"' them Information. He ftlt a ¡reat deal of IUppon from ,taff, Other membtn of the Commission CODamed. Vice Chair Thomu stated that when Council tums doWII a o-"'¡"ion recommendadOD, they are actllally 0ImÌD1 down their CIWD 1Wf. CouDd\man Moore stated that when thelmH of th. Coral Canyon Ito, IIID requat _ before Council, he wited the area. In that loeadon there wu a me nreet II)'Item wtud of a Irid 1)'Ittm. CouncD denied the·raldena the ItOp ,ilDl. However, I! they had bad allid II)'Item of ltI'tta, they _uld haw had many 1D0re 'ÍJDI. He 1UI1.lted the the Issue of sÍJDI could be dtl.ptt4 entirely to dM Safety ('.........I·slolI. but 1nI'Iic ,~s could be appealed. · t--"'*Ioner Malacia uked why Council did DOt qree with the City Randarðl. Mayor Nader mponded that be had problllDl with the wel¡ha and felt the C-...I·.IOD should rwiew to let I! dI. wei¡ha ¡lven by ata1f are acante. eo......IuW 1f Malacia stated it would _ that dM It&!!' Ibou1d be betÞr IUppOIUd by CouDcD I!thq lIIe Ibe 1WIdanII¡I_ by CouncD. . , . Mayor Nader upr"Hd that the empbuls u to how the IIaIIdarðlan 6InDu1atad wwld be a pod area for die CollllllÌlllon to look at. · CoIIncIlman Malcolm IUnated that the o-...I..IOD ahould ao throu¡h the ..-ent wmaDt lI)'Item and aU. l'tCOIDIIIendadODl for DproWlllent. VIet Qa1r Tbomu Itatt4 dM CommiIIlon looks at dM ..'-- IIdt __lilt at timeta. wÐ1 be put ill daat nrpdra Mty poiDts for ODIy twtnty.6w poina. CouncI1man Moore stated that ~ of1lle SafItJ ('-...I..lon', tub dea1s with tralftc COIIÞl: 1pted,Ii¡nal'. end/or IÌ¡III. He felt the major problem today it Ipttdin¡. He IUlPJted that the o-...I·,IOD haw a tfOrbbop to ,.4DII _)'I to stop .,elf;'", . Mayor Nader aunened that the C-...I-ion lit Into broader iINIIlDItead ofdea1Ù11 with __ cue.þy. · CUt. He lU,cuted that the CommiIIion look It other llllAfe pncticet end look at dilferent lKbnolo¡les. He ftlt dM CoUDCi1 .hould dtlepte ailDlllI' authority to the Safety C-"''''~Ion u It did to die PJannVl, ('-"''''''Ion', CUP process. . ~ JJ~);/ MinIltU ..bNuy 27. 1992 'II' .. ('-...I..ioner 'acli11l IUt.d b. bad no problem with Incrusin, th. Saf.ty CommIaslon', authority. His '. CODCem wu bow milch wei,tlllbollld die)' Jive, to Itd ncOllllllenclatlolll. If JOII dlA¡ree with aWr, are JW elrecdw7 . . Counci\øwl Malcolm NpOnded that the Commission Is to look It the IWIcIard. The Council wollldlik. to Jive th. t-"'Iuioll mort allthority, ~lIt If JllII P entlre1y b)' th. IWIcIarcb, dI.n th. CommIaslon Isn't Med.d. CoIIIIcIlmaD Moore ninlorc.ddlat Itd e!0IIII't make die law. but the)' ablcled b)' the law. Only the people wbo IIIIUa die law can cban¡. It. Mayor Nader ttated on. of die IUIOIII we haw c-...IJliolll Is that 1IIey are abl. to foc\II on en laNe. He ftCOIIIIIIcdee! that Itd punlle 1IIe 1.p1lty of Nmin, th. Safety CommIaslon from enldvisoty body to one wItb IlIthorlty. He uplaln.cI that when th. Plannin, Commission makes I e!eclaion on I CUP applicltion II II fina111J1l_ a Council member appeal. It to th. CII)' CollllcD within tell da)'l. MSC (JW)EJI.IMALCOU ID bne the CIty ItIVeI)' briD¡ ID .- (onb dlatwvule! IiIIIh çpeals from the Well ('_I..I.m III a IimIIII' .., ID dlat ., the '1.....Ift, ,._Io.Wo', aJPa. "~'T carried ~2 (Q . HorIDD IDe! .r......... Ü--~. Vice CbaIr 'I'boaw ubd why WIIII't die Safety CoIIImIaslon iImIwd IIIin)' of die fIINre dIIzIp pin¡ on IUcb . Cå....'tb MlDa¡emcL No 011. from tbe Safety ('-...1.,101I wu 011 dIeIr Board. Councilman Malcolm ttat.cI that any time th. ('-...Inlon bellevu CoIIncD neecla to N¥iew aomethin,. th.r. tan't anytbinJ wron, for ch. o-...I·.lon to make a motion ID rec--d a cban¡.. 1bIa collie! be ¡tone anydme 1be ('_...1"\011 uw a problem. 'I'he CollllcD wantee! 111. ('........In\Oll ID be proacdw Inate,d of ~~.' ! Mayor Nader nkaratee! that 111. ('........I**IOG wu DOt UmItacIID items from CoIInd1orltd. He ttat.cI that 1hey collie! put .11' items on 1IIeIr a,encla forconalderatlon. They abollle! }ook at 1be whol. ,ICNfe. He' twed1bet 1be reqllllt.d oriUDanc. Ibollle! '0 10 dI. Safety ('....."'I··lon fim ad 1btII 011 die ClI)' CollllcD apøcIa 1111be DIIt COIIPI. of weeks. '111m beIn¡ DO fIanber butJD." 11M IDItdnJ wu ~e! at 6:22 ,.m. ;:¡;ti. fbu4 . lewdy A.~et. CMC . City QII'k . .' . ~ /;-/.5' - .--.-.-----.,...--...-- ---.,,-.----.....-.---..- _...._,.,"'---~_._.._---_.._.._.- . . · RECORD Of ACTIONS Of THE JOINT MEETING BETWEEN THE CITY Of CHULA VISTA CITY · COUNCIL AND THE SAfETY COMMISSION ON THVRSDAY. FEBRUARY 27. tiil IT WAS MOVED BY NADER, SECONDED BY MALCOLM, to direct staff to put on a future City Council agenda an ordinance that would 1fmit appea1s of the Safety COll'l1lission to the Council a 1a the way appea1s are currentll handled on Conditional Use Permits from the P1anning COll'l1lission to the ity Council. Further, it was mentioned that the appeals shou1d be restricted to the Council and not to the applicant or members of the pub1ic. This wi11 require further discussion with the City Attorney. Final1y, the ordinance amendment should · receive Safety Commission input as we11. · MOTION PASSED 3-0, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS RINDONE AND GRASSER HORTON ABSENT. In addition, during discussion of the r01e of the Safety Coanission, the f0110wing was advocated by Counci1: 1. Mayor Nader suggested that the Safety Commission h01d a workshop to review traffic standards and warrants, with the greater emphasis on pedestrians. Mayor Nader said the Safety Commission shou1d 100k at the weights of the various criteria. · 2. Mayor Nader felt that the Safety Commission should look at enforcement technology which .ilht be helpful and uke recommendations. An exemp1e stated was photo ra ar. ' 3. Mayor Nader indicated he felt the Safety Commission should look at the desi~n of streets and the scCeed limits associated with that design versus . neig borhood safet~ and pe estrian access and not simply the focus being on moving automobi es. . · 4. Counci1member Moore suggested that the Safety Commission should have a workshop and come forward with recommendations on speeding, that is, what · comprehensive measures aight be taken to reduce speeding Citywide. GK:ub .f~ . . ~ ))~/b . . SAFETY COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL POLICY £xh j bit Ó MEETING NOTES . 11 Tuesday, June 21,1994 1:15 p.m. - 2:10 p.m. 0ifT Swanson's Office Attendance: John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works Cliff Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Bob Thomas, Chair-Safety Co~ssion Frank Rivera, Associate Traffic Engineer Subject: City Council Policy Delegating Addiûonal Authority to the Safety Commission Bob Thomas wants the proposed policy to befair, 10 that citizens can appeal recommendations. Cliff Swanson said that the policy will more than likely be revised and that the draft report will not necessarily look like the fmal report. The City Council may want a 4/Sths vote to do this policy. John Lippitt replied that maybe the first time a citizen goes to the City Council, the policy might be overruled. Cliff Swanson wanted '11, . Appeals Process,· on the draft policy to be revised as follows: 1. ' If Safety Commission and staff concur, tlIen Issue is fmal. 2. If Safety Commission disagrees with staff, then Issue loes to Council. John Lippitt said that there might be an issue where staff disagrees with die Safety Commission's reconunendation, but not strongly enough to forward staffs recommendation to the City Council. Suffs posiûon (recommendation) may change due to new information provided lit the public hearing according to Cliff Swanson. Bob Thomas responded that IOmetimeS when this happens, the report is tabled for one month. Cliff Swanson had IOmeconcems about certain traffic control devices because only the City Council has budgedng authority. Signals, which require I budget item, could not be approved by die Safety Commission. The policy could be written 10 that the Trial Traffic Reaulation does nOt have to go to the City Council for fmal approval. John Lippitt feh that speed limit changes, 1I'8ffic signal projec:ts and OIlIer Capital Improvement Projec:ts could only be recommended and not be approved by die Safety CommIssion. Cliff Swanson said thllt the City Council knows what staff's recommendation Is becallse the recommendation Is included in the report. John Lippitt Indicated that code would have to be modified to allow the Safety CommIssioner to make permanent changes. ~ /3-77 .___~_._m...~___··_ Safety Commission/City Council Policy Meeting Notes June 21, 1994 Page 2 ..rt-r · Cliff Swanson presented the following scenario: Staff is opposed to a stop sign installation which the Safety Commission and the public wants installed, there needs to be legislative authority of the City Council. Steps #1 through f/9 in the draft policy are basically okay. With #10, if the Safety Commission and the Traffic Engineer suppon the citizen, then the traffic control device goes in. Bob Thomas asked about the difference between a citizen appeal versus a staff appeal process. · Cliff Swanson said that then the Item would go to the City Council as an agenda Item. With respect to #11, Appeal Process, the following revision: ·If the Safety Commission and the Traffic Engineer have disagreed, . the City Council will review all appeals and notify the citizen if the appeal will be the Council agenda. . Stafrs recommendation and the Safety Commission's recommendation would be included in the repon to Council. Bob Thomas questioned the 6O-day appeal process. John Uppitt said that if there is a disagreement between SafetY Commission and staff, the item should go to the City Council. · . According to Cliff Swanson, this takes about one month. For instance, with regards to stop signs, If staff feels that it is unsafe to install additional signs, but the Safety Commission wants the signs In, the citizen does not necessarily have to appeal because the item would go to the City Council. If the City decides to back off with the recommendation, then the signs would be Installed. John Uppltt stated that once a stop sign is Installed for a trial period, Its removal Is a problem. Bob Thomas wanted the Safety Commission to be able to make a Trial Traffic Regulation permanent without having to take it to tile City Council. John Uppitt feels that the Safety Commission needs additional · luthority but we may still have to go the City Council. In addition, we will have to notify the public. Bob Thomas asked If the Safety Commission could attend the City Council meeting In order to help with discussion. John Lippitt replied ·yes.· Cliff Swanson wants to get the City Council out of the process to reduce paperwork. The policy needs to be comprehensive so that it is done right. . Bob Thomas thought that a citizen could come In and fill out an appeals form to get the ball roDin¡. Everyone discussed the time necessary to complete this usllnment and felt that a complete packet would take 6 to 10 weeks before it is scbeduled on a City Councilllenda. Therefore, it could go to the City Council sometime in September or October. If necessary, the Safety Commission could hold . special · meetinlln Aulust. II_a.... by I'rani Ri..... WfC":\IIO_I.M ~ JJ-Ir E xhi bi-t- \::) COUNCll. POUCY CITY OF CHUI.Å VISTA SUBJECf: SAFE1Y COMMISSION POUCY EFFECI1VE NUMBER DATE PAGE 11().09 03-06-73 1 OF 1 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 6772 I DATPJ): 03-06-73 BAOCGROUND It lIu been lIot.d that certain lite plllll haw definite etfecu upon the flow of nftic 011 adjacent JUtets or lUeets havins accel. to major streets. It Is often the fact that the City Co\l1lcD and Plannins Commission, at the lime of public hel1'in,., mllSt spend lIMecesSU)' åme upon the detaD. or U'lftic lIow and lite plllll. It Is therefore de.ired to establish a policy which _lIId take aclvantase of the fwlction or die Safety CommÌl.ion resardlns luch mane" of vehicular or pedellrian traffic and establish procedure. whereby lite plllll wollld, \I1Ider ceruin circWllltallCe., be lubject to the review of the Safety Commis.ion. . PURPOSE Establishins a policy whereby the Safety Commis.ion wD1 be called upon at an' early stase in the planninS proce.. for the evaluation of projects which may relate to manen or vehicular or pedestrian traffic safety within the public riShts.of·way within the City of Chllla Vista. POUCY 1. All precise plan. and .ite plllll for the COIIIU\Iction of facDities adjacent to major streets or havln¡ access to major JUtets which, In the opinion or Itaft'. i.e., Director or PlannlnS. Director of Public Works, Fire Chief and Police (hief, wollld In li¡ht of the plan u submined create pos.ible hazardous condition. eftecrins 1IIe vehiclllar or pedestrian Safety o-",¡u¡on for evaluation and review. 2- The Safety Commis.ion sha1I evaluate said precise p1IIIIand site p1llll in nference to meir etfect upon traffic problems. and .hallsubmit their analysis to me P1annln, C-",iuion and City CouncD at the time IUch plllll are considered by said bodies. .J?1 /J-'/ r . D1 - -.-.-..-----....".--.-,--..-- Qaapter2.44 SAPE1Y COMMISSION" SecdODl: · 2.44.010 «aared-AppolntalGlt-TlrJII.Quonma..Ra aacI..,walioaa. 2.44.020 Powen aacI d"~ Scope. 2.44.030 ur~"'1" 2.44.010 Created-AppoIn"NIII:-T~_Rula aacI ftJI.la.w., There II created and establiShed the Chula Yilta Safety cotllDlløioll, which Iba11 coDlfst of seven memben to be appointed by the city councU and to hold office at the pleaure of the councD Pllnllant to the requiremena of Article VI of the Chaner. All of said memben .hall be qualified electon of the city. No memben .hall hold any paid office or employment in the city ,overnment. The memben Iba11IelVe for a · tenD of four yean; provided however, that those memben presendy appointed to the nlety councD Iba11 continue to .erve a memben of the nlety commission, and the tentll of said memben shall be ItIllerecI m accordance with the existing tentll expiring on June 30th of the fourth year of said terms, and provided lurther, that any of .aid memben who may not be qualified electon of the city may continue to IelVe and the city council may consider the reappoinlment of .uch memben for not more than one four.year term. Each member .halllelVe until his .uccessor is duly appointed and qualified and all Vacancia shall be filled lor the unexpired term of the memben who.e places have become vacant. The chief of police and the IrafIic engineer of the city Iba11 be ex officio memben of the cotllDlløion but they shall have DO WIIte. The COllUtlÚSion Iba11 select a chairman from ia membenhip annually. Four memben Iba11 constiNte a quonun lor the transaction of bllline.. and the affirmative vote. of the m~ority of the entire membenhip of the cotllDlløion Iba11 be necanJy for it to take any action except to acljoum. The commi'.ion .hall ado: reaonable rule. and re¡ulations lor conductin, ill ·lnquiries and Iba11 render fÌI findings anD · recommendations in writin, to the city councD. COrd. 1530 II, 1974; Ord. 105611 (part), 1967; prior code 12.92). . 2.44.020 J'owe¡. and duIÏeI Scape. The duties of the nlety cDllllDiuion shall be to conceive and to develop Idea or IIIlIe.tions which would specifically or ,enerally conaibute to the improvement of pmonal or propeny safety within the city area, and to receive and process IIIch idea from any Individual or iroups of Individuals, 'and, after IIIch ·Uße.tiODl have been IÍven careful consideration and.Ndy by memben, both Indiy\dua11Y,"d coUectively, the nlety commission shall make appropriate recommenclatlons, by resolution, to the dty councD. All recommendations Iba11 be considered and acted upon favorably or unfavorably. The scope of the operations of the nlety commlnion may embrace any hàzardOIll condition, whether it be physical or materia1, which would jeopardize human safety, or callie damage to propeny both within and outlicle the home or IndlUtly; providtcl however, that the belic function of the Cðm""·,lon Iba11 be related to matten of vehicular or pedestrian lraftic nlety within the public ri¡ha-of._y In the city and nlety hazards which may UÎlt on or about pubJicJy-owned Janel and facUities. All of the provisions of Sections 600 throlllh 606 of Article VI of the Chaner Iba11 comroJ a to the conduct and operation of IIIch f<>m",'., on and ia memben. COrel. 105611 (pan), 1967; prior code 12.93). 2.44.D30 lie Ir.. The safety ~Ion Iba11 hold at leur one reJUlar meetin,each month on the day and at the lUIIe dIIIe and m the place that it shall des,,"ate by resolution, and ,uch special meetinp a IIIch CðJII"'inion may require. Said meetings shall be .ubject to all requiremena of .tate and local laws aovemina notice and open meetinp. COrd. 105611 (pan), 1967; prior code 12.94). ~ /)~,;¿¿; 2. Exercises such functions with respect to land subdivisions, planning and zoning as specified by state law and local ordinances. The Planning Commission works in conjunction with the Planning Department. P. RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION 9/15/70 Ord. 1299 . The Resource Conservation Commission (formerly called the -Environmental Control Commission/Historical Site Board") is composed of seven members appointed to four year terms on a staggered basis. This body has the following scope of responsibility: 1. Recommend and advise the City Council regarding legislation relative to the environment. . 2. Work with all other boards, comnissions, and other agencies, state and federal government, in the area of environmental quality. 3. Promote and assist community action groups in the private sector whose existence and purpose is to reshape the community environment. 4. Hold hearings, take testimony of persons under oath, ,if desired, relating to any IIItter under investigation or in question before the Commission. 5. Advise the City Council regarding energy conservation, environmental quality and historic site preservation (Ordinance No. 1928). The Commission works in conjunction with the Building and Housing Department. Q. SAFETY COMMISSION 5/9/67 Ord. 1056 The Safety Commission consists of seven .embers appointed to four year terms on a staggered basis. The Safety Commission has the following scope of responsibility: 1. Conceives and develops ideas a"d suggestions which would specifically or generally contribute to the illlpr:ovement of personal, traffic or property safety within the City. . 2. Receives and processes such ideas from any individual or group of individuals and, after consideration and study, IIIkes appropriate recommendations, by resolution, to the City Council. The Commission works in conjunction with the City Engineer's Department. 3. Disseminate infol'lllltion concerning hazardous waste utters to the Council. -20- ~ / J/~J _,m..____"" .....___~...._ ._._.__,....,._ . . - This Page Blank - ~ ) "7 '-çJ~ £xhi bi+ ~ CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE BHABLING SECTION eve 385 Page 22 Di". , .z.ocal Auf;bor1t1.. 385. "Local Authorities" means the legislative body or every county or municipality bavin¡ authority to adopt police re¡ulations. CBULA VISTA IlUHICIPAL CODE Cbapter 10.12 ~.ffic ~~m4Di.tr.tion IIBW SECTION 10.12.0eO saf.t7 c: f..ion Power. an4 outi.. Tbe Safety Co-nl-IOD aball: . . .. Where apeclflc authority bas been I"anted by resolution or the City Council, and where evidence or liven apeclflc authority II contained within thll code, be empowered to pass by resolution or the eommlaalon, any amendmentl to all sections or acbedules, within which apeclflc authority bas been aranted u a provision or this chapter, DOt withstanding the provisions to the contrar)' contained In this chapter or within the Veh}cle Code. 'IRAftIIC CDH11l0l. ÞEY\l2S' QIpcIr lC1.24 1U4.CDO JDftI1I~,.. _...~-., *,,-- -..... 1ud '" dtJ· '!h. city clintii' IDlY alIo pllC' and ...·"'øÞl. DUM 10 be placed Ind IIIIfnIllnedIllCh addidonal tnI!ic CODIrOI devict. U 11I1)' be Melliii")' II' pI'OpIr IOrel\lll" lldic II'to pIdt II' wam nIfic u required "'1hiI dr1~r 1111_.......'. .diMn1l Irn'DlIøiDa ....n IDIUI. (Or4. m 11 (pIn),I966¡ prior cod. 119.4.1 (C». Add WbeneY.. ØT aril....- ... I-lat. of die d~ ...--.......... .. 1IeIcrIbeI, 1CI.24mo .......-f·..,...... .....1 ...- ". C:~..t\"e. To 1\~ 5..4(01\ ne city tzIIÜIHI' ahaJl ucllUin, detenaIDe 11I4 reammend to die COIIJIcD die locatioN ""'" auch tIpIb 1ft required by fItld Invad¡ldon. nIfic COIIftþ ind 0Ibtr tnI!ic .lnfonItatioJl U IDlY be perdntnt .. ItII dtterlllÏllltioDl1bemr- IbaIl be made Inacconlance widllhOH ad"1C en¡InetrIna and IIfery ICIftduü 11I4 ~ Nt Ior1b In die CIIlfonûa MalntCllftCt Manual Iøutd '" die DIwIIIon of Hip..,. .. .. ... .. Clllfonlla Dep-._ .. PûUc WodcI. (Old. m 11 (pIn). 1966; ..... .1 11'o404tI)). . 'IHRCUGH ftUE'I'S AND m» 1N'ŒRSIC11CJHS' ¢"" .oW 10.32 2U10101lp............LI JIIII~' No C~o.t\~c. To 1\1. Sact/u Wber..vtf any crnIinInct .1'tIOI1Idon of.. city ",ilMt. Ift4I1tJcrtbes III)'IINIt .....lhIreof .. . tIIrouIh IIrttt, 01' In)' Inttn'cdoD at ....cII ftb1cla an required 10 IIOP at 11M II' .on IIIftJ ce. themo. II' 1ft)' railroad c:roaslnl at wtI1ch wlllel. 1ft nqIIirtd 10 1tOP.. the cky en¡Inttl' Ihall erect Iftd .ltntaIn IIOP 1111II .. followa: It. IIOP alan allall be erected 011 tlclllnd every nrøt Iattntcdnll1lch IhroIIaJI nrøt 01' ponIon thereor 10 delllfllted Ind at 1b0l. tftlmlCtl of eMir IftttntctioN wIIm a atOp II required Ind at 1ft)' raDl'OId pdt croaalna 10 "'11fII'"' IWf)' IIICh lIan abalJ COlIform with. Ift4Iba1l .. placed u provId.d 1ft" Vabiclt c.crl. (()rd. 973 11 (pan). 1966; prior cod. 11'.7.1~ . ,. /3-"'¿) J ""_ -._u._._______" .._-----,~----- · 10" œo P-iV-4. St"¡"e Ta.... \J e.,.c! COIAl\c.í I A- 'DIose meu and pIN of meu established by molution of the dt) 1I...ø-are hereby decllred to lie Ihrolllh mers for the purposes of this aection IS descn1>ed in Semon 10.52.030 and Schedllle II Ittached hereto and made a pan of dùs litle. S. 'nIe provisions ofdùs aemOD aba1I also apply to OIIe or IIIOle enU'lnees to Intenections IS Istablished by resollltion of the dty lllUllillS described in Semon 10.52.030 and Schedllle U attachld hereto and ..dl a part of 1bis titll. · , The provisions of this leCÙon IhaII apply It 1boM hilhWl)' raDway pcle _inls IS aublished by C. nso1l1tion of dI. dty lllUllil. (OnI. 97311 (pan).I966; Jrio;r code 119.7.2). ~ 1UGH1'.(III·WAY IIUETS' ....".. 10.J6 ,,,u-01011 '1:, ~...... .awezm. Stril:.~ 1'J,4" Wør-d CO~I'\t.¡' In .ccordance with Chapter 10.32 of dúllldl ad pIII'IIWIt to nsolution or cclinance of th. dry .llIItlil. anel when appropriat.. have been lftCtIeI cMnI DOlle. ofJield rilbt41-wa'.ltions, cIriven · of fthicIes abaIl Jield riJht.of·wayat dI. fo1Igwin¡ tmenectiolll: 1 _1m? 'IDIIk. NII_ ..... Add city Ielitlll'. lIot.: Tbe 1111IItIIJItM .ctS of lb. 1I18 .liI cleafptatinl field rl¡hl.of-wa, møtI, IIIICIenakln 1Iy resolution or orcIinane., IS requlreel by th. Vehiel. Cod. of the Nil of Califomla, are malntaln.elln dI. oIIiel of dll dry dirk. the clinctor of pll1l1ie woIiII anel the polic. cIepaftIIIent. (Or4.126O 11, 1970; Orel. 97311 (pan), 1966; prior code 119.22.1 (pan). · ~MDYDIIH'I'i1' ~ ,tIJ lQ.40 1Q.40.030 a-tI~ 11II1II 'IF r1 - ........ ¡ t --. A.I.. WbeDImIr., ..11".- .. I -"It Ion or &be city. ."... IIDd dIIa1bea, StrIke 'Au Illy IIIIIt.iI, ., "..h"l. \lfl. III. "I--.'nl,n ,hili ciI)' qiMtr. aay ....1I1btM IIIttnemons It which driven of ftbid.. aba1IlIot IllÙI a I'I¡hI, Itft or U &IIftI, .. the ciI)' IIIJInter IhaII plaet proper .iJlllat .lIch InterMctIons. The IIIIkInI of IIIch 11IIIII11II)' lie prtbi\IllI. between cenaln boIIn ol any cia, IDd penlllttacl at .dIer boun,ln which -= die _I aba1Il1e plainly Indicated 011 the '¡JIII or IIMJ 11II)' lie ._JVH wballUCh 11IIIII_ fCIDIae4. (Ord. 97311 (pan).I966; .... CIIcIt 119.5.2). . · 10«' """ aIIk __ ........ '1.1 .... r. .. t r--. A.cI ..-....,..., ...1-..... .. .-oludøa or &be city r ..,... _. nil, . . St~ 'al II" ..~~=11IIIi1. \If I' .1 "11..,...,..1.. II" ....... aay ~ ~.... oCOJInlltcllIItIntcII- atwbldl cIItwan IIftbiclellla11_.... a rI¡br IIInI opIDIt a trdIc aIpaI ....,. flldicadoll. '11M cIIJ .....~ .. IIaIII .... ".,. lips . IUCh .... I Clfw' (Ord. 973 11 fpIn). 1966; pier cMeI19.5.4tA.). .....WAT IIUITI AND AL1ZY11I .... - I 10.44 . . 1O.44.cn0 lip "I IT - ......r· No G"O^,CL To ThIs Sc.c.t/ot\ WhIMWI' 11I1 aiMnce or IIIOI\IIItIO II dill . Mlpate III)' 0111 WI)' lint! . aliI)', dll dry · eqIneer Iha11 place ancI ....100..'" """ atvlnllIICict dIereol. lIIeI .. IIICh .ldtDllhalllIe dectlw 1IIII_111Ch ef¡ns are III place. SIps IIIdIcatinllhe clinction of IawfIIIIrl!"IC .....aDtIIt lhalllIe placed at ..,., lD_ctlon when ...1ØI1IIt of nmc III die epposa clinction II probIbJtecI. I1røD II -1patecI IhallIIe describtcllD 1cbtcI1II11 atracbecl bento ancIlIIacIe a part of dill cbapgr. (Ord. 97311 fpIn), 1"" ,.....119.6.1).., ~ !) ~;Z 'I . . , - 10.41.030 II .... ..-IIIaID 11__ _-Ð ..........w..a....1X. 'fbe Saf.ty eo.ailllliOD and/or the City BD9~ ..y iDcr.... çeed l!ait. ~ .. _rwee wllh SeClio1\l10.4I,010 _d 10,41.020 or dIia dlaptlr. pumaaIIllO ordiD_w OIIDI chy couacil. _d wllft! .pproprial. RpI' !law..... _.4 aiYiJlJ DOliN .....of..' .uIa_ a,.dliai' .".' IIIaII .. U Nt fanh IIlnill OD 111. foUowIDlllneU or ponioDI or nntD: , ~ ...... ,ad. .... of.... -'V·hI.1II ""1 at ..... u.11 ldItor'. aot.: ,.. IIIlINIItlw 8rD 0' 111. _ciI lanuill, "It-law ..... laiD lllBUiII ..... 8dtnab. ~ ....ldOD or riA_ea. u ÞC 1Ilrt' ~. 111. Vthic:ll CocIt of 111. IIDI' of Cülarala. .. aaID.etI ill 111. oIIIct of 111. chy dirk. 111. lIirt_r of pu1l1åc .... -. 111. ,.tiN ..........L . (Ord. 97311 (pan). 1966~ pior.s. 119.211 (pan». 1041.050 ~ 1 -" ..... JIa\1I II __ .... Ð . J .......ScMIh1. X. ~ saf.ty CGIIIaills10D cd/or the çity BD;iDMr ..y decnaH apeeð U.aita /' .. __....N wldI hclio. 10.4I.04O.r dIia cUp1tr, pumIUIllO ordia_et 0' tII. eIty lOUIIol. .. ..... ....r-.,.rIata alp uw.... encud at\IID1 aoåN IIIlnof.lII. ....- ....d liIII1, aIIa11 .. U Nt ~ ,.,. ... . ilia foUowIDllO'IID or poniou of lineD: I . IMcIan1I Prill. ,.... ..... of... ..;-.;~ . ..... at ..... Uail ....0 IIMcIItro lasl H Sntl IIaIIcho ..1 ~t)' 'edewa)' HMPH . 1_ VIlla Way Ias,HStretI lancbo ..1 "tY ,.rkway 3S MPH lasl H Intt lasll.ak. Drive MOIØII MiIIl.1 ~o.. 45 MPH ....1 MIpal all Pro_, VaJlt')' "II SolIdi lad SI MPH PnIlII V.u., ... Oty UaiD MOllal Millltl Road 30 MPH Mala S1ratt .·5 ,,....ay OIey VaJlt)' ~... 40 MPH OID)'VaDt')' ... Mala StretI ...OS ,,.....y 40 MPH W1IIIIt aou Ota)' Låø ... SoIIdIttt)' Oty UaI1l . HMPH OlD)' LUa ... .... A_III WØda aou 10 MPH Q1å1lri ..... HIlltop Ddw Onqt A_III JO MPH 0If0rd ..... lAth., CIII..... 1,3:a5 " JO MPH .. of Inl rway UIIÒI'I...: TIlt _"-11ft.. of... _cD .¡..·.....II1ItHaw a"'_ .......I1IIa..... .... ."1'"'''-. ~ ....111II. or ....... ........ ~ tII. Vehlcl. CocIt oflll. ... ofCalifna... ........Ia... o!Ict or... city dertr..... 61.11. ofpuWlc ...... tII. poliN ..,.,...L . (Ord. 2590 11. 19M; Ord. 251711. 1"3; Ord. 2513 11. 1"3; Old. 2513 11. 1993. Ord. 973 11 (parI), 1966; pior ... 119.23.1 (pan). Y-J};, .2S- . --~.._..".._._..-_."~~~_.~-~------._.- .----~~ --.----- · .lurnrlG.lTANIXNG ItRO PAJUaNOn - .~IG.S2 . S.....'""r,.daI..........u ..1.U-1LI1uP_md..,iDMnKdDIII. strike. Ccv.I)c.i' III Iccordance wllb 5ectlOllll0.32.010 and 10.31.020, puml&ftt to _011111011 01' ordinance of Ibe ell)' ""111, and wMUppropriate ÅpII hive lI"uncted IiYinIDotie. oflplcillltOpl, driven offth!du shall ItOP It: A- £V117 ....1KIIon Won IIIterfn¡ III)' of lb. followlD& _ or poniOlll of møœ; · .. 11I_ or_ _ to 111. foIIowiD¡~: - . 'IIInuP IIr.cI ....16..... "'f q"~ II Willa at ..,. -Of -a ICnIÞ . .-I,a 'InIIIc Il . .Id m Acid dty lditor'. DOte: '11M I\Ibnanm lea of IlL. II .11.111 '.i¡nIlID¡ IplClalltOpI, Ulldenaklll by nsoIlldon or · ardiDane.. u nqulnd 11)' dI. VebIc\. Cod. of die ltat. of Callfonùa. an -'¡""lR4d III the o!rict of dI. dl)' clerk, the dInctor 16 public .... aIId die police depanlDeDt. . 1U2.0'70No./'· ._--.-... A. St,.ík~"1kt. Wc,.c:I CCHIf'lcil. A- No eperarar of III)' w!IIcJ. IIba!I I!DP, IWId, park .. Ie_ -dina IIICh wbIcI. III III)' of dI. foUowiD¡ pile.., GelpI wblllllleUlII)' to avoid COII1Iicr with IIdIu nlfie III' ill -rUance with die IIirectiaN 16 I police deer 01' IIdIu IIIIIIoriMd oIIieer, 1Id'ie lip orlipal: I. IDIII)' ani _bll,h.d by Ibe city ...1iI U I DO puIIIDa _ ....1IICh _IIIIMI¡"'_ by elfidallipIlII' nd palm III die CIñ; · 2- 011 I 1khwaIIt; So WidIID all lbw..aIon; <t. WidIID . _-,....nt; S. Ai_pille .. IIppOIIte III)' _ __ or ellltNcIIaD .... IIICh IIIIIIÜII, .""11II11I' fUIùDI wwld Ñl1Nct 1Id'ie; 6- 011 .... ......,... of III)' wbIcIe r J'ad....... the .... . cmt»of the -; 7. UpID ., kIdp . .... ...4IIIlINCIIII'IupoII .IIiPWaJOI' wIdIIn . _NIJ IUIIIIII; · .. Upaa, III... _ .,...,.., nck ill IIICh ---. _..... ..,. ..- the _. -. of III)' _ nwUalupoIIlIICh IrKk; . - 9. WidIID ., 6oIt'-01 Wad ..... ~ 11 . and cIaIdJ ..... . wIIII~. +1Ido..... and - -I.; 10. III tr.t 16.,..uc...... .I'~"IJ.""" _ ..16.... aDd of............1aadIDI .,. ..... . 11. WidIID.-,... iI. _..a..n6. III . ....-.....j . u. WidIID.-,... of.... aDd of.... ... ndII8I I . &:If-II: · U. WidIID dllftyftlt of the ........ aell_., '-"illllIpII..., lip OI'trIIic -- tlplllacallll . .... aWe 16.... ....dway, 14. WIIhIn ItI)' of...... .... '-I' 1111II by ~ the 7J'::; ¿,. 10.52.090 c-"'""'CiaI ftbid.ParkIn¡ iii ..ldmtial cIiI1ricti prohibited wbm. No pmon shall park any "hicle WhOM prima:)' use is for commercial purposa havinl a m:mwacNrer'. crOll vehicle weilht ratinl of twelve 1h0Uiand pollJld. or more for more th:m five hOllfS in al!Y ruidential cIiItrict (which include. parkin& on private propeft)') except: It. While 10ldinl or uNoldinl proplft)', which nqulns Iim, III addition to IIIch five hour period to complete .uch work; or .. ' I. When IIIch vehicle is parked in connection with. and in aid of, the performance of I HrVIce to or on property in the block in which .uch whicle is parked and time ÚI addition to IIICb five hour period U nllonlbly lIecusa:)' to complete .uch MMce. for the purposes of this section, cenain termS shall be defined II follows: It. Commercill vehid" shall mean .in,le vehicles whoM primat)' use is for commercial purposes and hlvinl more than two axle. or combination of vehicl" havinl mon than two axle.; a .in,le vehide or combination of vehicl" (twenty) (20) feet or more in lenp; or a .inlle vehicle or combinltion of vehicles .ÍI (6) feet, lilht (8) inche. or more in width, and shall include, but shall not be limited so. dump D'IIcb. movinl "ns. trictors, pole, or pipe dollia. No camper body which hi. been deuched from the motor vehicle .hall be left lundin& on a city _t at any lime. Co!"rect;t"~ flftJ I. a"idential district shaI1 mlan any block III which fl.. IIIIt pm:ent of 1M pund level buDdinls frontinl on said block are dweUinll. Said lIwel1in& _y be 1iIII1._t JtNCNnI or multi·llJlit ID'IICNrU. (Ord. 2190 11, 1987; 0rcI. 217612,1986; Ofd. 202411 (part), 1983; Ord. m 11 (pan), 1966; prior cocI. 119.10.5). SCLS2Z70 PaddDa.flralllbJø4It aU..... oa _1...... 111 ÐdwIr '1I'.n - ,~... . When .ip are trlct.d J!WI,lIotic. thereof, no ptrIOJI shaI1 putt a ftbidllt IIIJ" upon any of die _a d.scribed in Section 10.52.280 and Schedul. m, machtd to aIMS made a pan or this chapter. (Ord. P7311 (part), 1966; prior ".119.11.3). 1ft.., t)M r . I ,-Pr L......... It aD ..... oa _I ..... - f "- INI m, St ri ke Cr.",r,t..;' 11\ acconIanct with Itcdon lG.$2.270, pIII'IIIIM . ftIOI1Idon or erdinanct of die cIIy ....iI. and wtMII appropriate aI¡ns have IIetD acted ....1IOtict 1bInof. DO ptrIOJIlbaII putt . wbicIt It lIlY 11IM IIpOD 11I1 or.. IInItI or porIÌOIII or.... . roo...: . . __ of..... r ~1 ,It . ..... It . ... . tYj cltJ IdIIoñ 1IOtI: '11M IIIbltandw actI the ....& ,utaInIn. to ScbtcIul. m 1IIIdtnabn" NOI\1don or erdInanc. u nqufnd by 1M Vt!úcIt eM. ofdlt arate or Califomla. are r·Ioo"'-dlll.. oIIct or.. cit)' dak, the director of;ub1ic -'" and .. ,.uce iItpanIDtIU. (Ord. m 11 (pan). 1966; prior code 119.22.1 (pan). .. ~/Jo/J 7 .~_.___...,.._". ___ ____.__n'" · lG.S2.290 h."1 .~ duriII¡ anaJD"" aD anaJD"~ It .a'r" nquJre4. - When IfInIIft erectedift .ach block sf9in, 1I0rice dlereof, 110 pertoll ahaIl park a vehicle between die boun .pecifled, or an)' da)' acept SWICIa)'l and public holicla)'l. u .hOWllIn Section 10.S:UOO and SchtcIule IV aaachtd hereto and made a pan of dûI chapter. within die dillrict or upon an)' or che _II llucribed iD aaIcI SchecIule IV. (01'4. 97311 (patt). 1966; prior cocIe 119.11.4). Ju.......hddDa........1IoIoa.I....- "'''''aD_ .... Itl ldaecIu1elV. strike. ~ti' · III accwclanct with ~on 10.52.290. ,un\WIt co _llIdon or orc!inance or die dry 11I111111, and .tIm appropriate .!JIII have been IftCttdlivln, notice dlereof, 110 penon .ball ,ark a vehicle between die houn lpeclfiecl herein on an)' cia)' ucept Suncla)'l and ,ublic bolide)'l upoD an)' orche roUowln, streell or portioaI 0( meeu: . ,Parkin¡ Name or 1fIf....r.,. IncIIn¡ ProbIbkecl SInet ., ., Side lletwlm . Add dty . lcIicoñ not.: The substantive leu of dll "UR.D ptrUiftin, co Scbedule IV, undmaken by nsolution or · orc!inance, u nquired by die Vehicle Code of dll .tate of Callfomia, 1ft maintainecl in die o!!ice of die cll)' . dark, die dinccor of public works and die police department. (Ord. 973 11 (patt). 1966; prior cocIe 119.22.1 (patt). J0.5Z.310 SlDppIq. ......r.,. orpaztdlla-Problbltld duriDI anaJD.... aD _ ...,¡to IT' Dl.1... Db I af_ ftqIIire4. Whm siJIIIIft ereaecI iD each block pin, MCica 1henol, 110 perIOIIlhalllCOp. aand. II' park I wbId. between die houn lpeclfted or an)' da)' acept S\IIIcIayI aDd public hoUcIa)'l, u IhowD iD ~on · 10.52.320 and SchecIu1e V. upon an)' or die II:NItI II' portions of _II u dacrIbtcIift Aid SchtcIule V ..-dMcI banco aDd macIt I pari or dûI chapter. (01'4. 97311 (patt), 1966; prior cocIa 119.11.5). . 7ft ft.-Jft ..II".... "'"'. or paztdIIa",.....""'-'I duriII¡ anaJD"" _ _ .... - '....._.L.I. V. . . Strike. COIA^cj( III acconIanct widI ~OD 10.52.310. pumwlt co nsolurlon or ordinance or die city 11.1111, and .tI_ approprilta a1pI have bttn erecttd aMnIlIOtIct 1htnof, no penon 1hall1tOp.1taIIcI1I' park I fthicI. "tween cht houri 1pecifiI4.... _ any"" actpC lunda)' aDd public hoIåcIIJI upoa any orcht follGWin¡ ..... or portioaIor.....: . - . . . _or .. ... J-~ iIoun - .... . . . IIde .. .. ""'-'I Add city , Iditer'J DOt.: 11M su1lltlnlM actI or chi 1IIIInll p _ ÞJnIna co SchtduIe V. undmaleen by nso1utIon or cmIinanct. u required by die Vehicle Code of cht state of Caliromla, 1ft lIIalDtainecl iD die oIrlCt of die cll)' d.... cht dinccor of public .... and cht police depanment. (Qrd. m 11 (patt). 1966; prior cocIa 11'.22.1 (patt)~ J) /' c2 7' .. . lo.s2.33O ParIdn¡.Time IiIDitect 011 nnaiD 1ll'eeÞ-Dri1'er llbe&Dee nquInd. When lism are erected in eaeb block sMnl notice mereof, no penon shall park a vehicle for lonler than the time specified thereon on any day pcept Sundays and public bolidays, as shown in. Section 10.52.340 and Schedule VI, on any of lIIe streets or ponionl of streets as described in .aid Schedule VI attaebed hereto and made a pan of mis chapter. (Ord. 97311 (pan), 1966; prior code 119.11.6). lG.52.W' partin¡·Time limited on c:cuiD ItnttI Sdltdule VI. Strike. Co..r.c; I In accordance with Section 10.52.330, punuant to resolution or ordinance of the city ""IIIil, and when appropriate lipts have been erected IÌvinl notice thereof, no penon Ihallnop, Itand or park any whicle for a period of time lonler man noted in this .ebedule on any day except Sunday and public holidays \lpon any of the followinl Itreets or ponions of streetl: Lenp of Name or BeaiMinl EDdinl Time Slnet at at Side Permitted Add city !diton note: The lubstantive acu of thl 1I1II.liI, pertaininl to Schedule VI, undertaken by resolution or ordinance as required by the Vehicle Code of the stlte of California, are maintained in the office or the city derk, me director of public works and the police depanment. lC1.S2.390 Diqonal pl!tdn1'ReqWred wbeD·Procedure. On any streets or ponions of streets established by resolution II diaaonal pl!tdnl zonel when liBns or pavement maikin,s are in place indicatinlluch dialonal parkinl. II described in Section 10.52.400 and Schedule VIII attached hereto and ÌDade a pan of this chapter, it is unlawful for Ibe operator of any vehicle to park laid vehicle acept at the anIle to the curb indicated by li¡ns or pavement marldnp aIIortÎIIIlpace to parked vehicles and entirely within the limits of said allotted Ipace, wim the front wheel n.arelt the curb within lix ineb.s or said curb. (Ord. 97311 (pan), 1966; prior code 119.1U(A.». 10.52.400 Dia¡oaal parkina.Permirted where-ScbecIul. WI. Strih. C<:, I!",c.í! In accordance with Section 10.52.390, punuant to resolution or ordinance of me c~ "lIlIliI, and when appropriate lipts and pavement markinls are in place livinl notice th.reof, whicles shall be pemlin.d to park dialonally upon any of the follOWÎftlltl'ltts or portions or ItI'Itts: . ~ of SU'ftt ~&,¡ . Erd&,¡. Side AdJ city . Editor'1 nor.: Th. INbltlndve aeu of thl II_Iii, ,enalnin, to Sch.dul. VI, undertaken by nsolution or ordinance II requir.d by the Vehicle Cod. or the stlt. of Califomia, are maintained in Ibe office or Ibe ciry derk, Ibe director or public works and Ibe pDlic. clepanment. lo.sz.45O PctdDI-ProbIbIted c1urIaa........ of_ .....,. __ ... -.... _~ IIT~__ ....IDa-Ðrtftr Ib I dMr- nquhd. When eaeb block or a pen ItnIZ bas been al¡n·post.d pina IIOåce Ihereof, DO person IhaII park a whide betw.en die hours JplCIfte4, on die: day of die week apecIfted. as shOWll in Section 10.52460 and Schedul. »V attaeb.d hereto and made a pan or this OIapter, within die diI1:rict or..,w 11I)' 01.. .-u _cribed in said Schedul. »V, (Ord. 226112. 1918). ~ - J?r.,l~ . .- .. -.---- --.-,---~--,._--_.._" _.~---'" · lG.52.46O P5~-PraIIibiÞcJ 6IriIII cenaiD bIIun ol cenaiD ..,. III cenaiD ....... .. die JIIII1IOM olllnet "I-Ïù¡ . . SOIEDULEXIV Strike COlJJ\cÎ 1 III eccorcImc. wfdI SecciOD 10.52.450, pumwlt. nsolutiOD or ordØwIct or lb. city ._.11. aDd whm .,.... vpriat. lip haw been posted MUÌIII fonh Ibt åy or Ibt wøIt IIId Ibe hoIIn or 11M üy that JiUkinI is proIu"bitecl for Ibe ... or IØ'Ht eweeplrl¡. PirII DOtict Ibtreof. _ perIOD IhaIl part a fthicIe betwltDdIe hoIIn apedliecllII1he åy oldie wøIt apecIfied for die pur'pOM olllnlt -.pilla apoII any or &be foUowiD¡ IInItI or ....... olllnltl: · Name of lelÛ\lÙDl Endin. Day/. KolIn Slftet At Ar lids Prohlblred Prahibited WoocI1awn Ave. HSt. Cul-de-Sac Wilt 11aunday llamolpm Woodlawn Ave. HSf. Cul-de-Sac East 1bunåy lpm·Spm (Ord. 226113. 1988). . 10.52.470 Paddøa-Salpe ol.....~' No .ection of düs chapter IllaJI be connnaecI u permItdn. any paztdn.1II 9ioIatlon or any other · provisions of this title. (Ord. 226111. 1988; Ord. mil (pan). 1966¡ prior code 119.17.15). 10.52.4IO"'-~'PIddDa'~F - ·..-olf/I.a.q.drad'....._...."..XV'. NuJs Update Pursuant. Vehicle Code Sectloll22S19, the foIlowiD¡ _1ft _!plated u .«net paztdn¡ loti .wried or operated by the City. It is WIlawful for any fthIde to part III a IDllllldpal paztdn¡ lot, _pt In accordance with the an¡1e· to th. curb Indicated by .!JIII or pawIDCIt IIWIdnp aIlouln¡ epact to parked _ides and tDtirely within the liIDItI or Aid aIloaed 1pIC'. with die froftt wbteI DtÏrIIt the curb and wilhln .Ix Inches of aald curb or other ICDp. ancIlII accordanct with the IIIIIt 1iIDfII1II"1..*~ em .i¡ns _d in the artL · Dnin_ted Parkin. Lot t.oeatfðft No.1 NcmhWllt comer of Cburch . MadroDa No.2 200 block of LadiI No.S Nonhtut ___ or 1.aIIdIa. DaWaœ No.4 N""d._.A COI'IItI' ol Cburch . DøidIoD No.5 SovthWIIt ___ of Cburch . o..~U'OD , No. 6 Near Southtut ___ of:nünl. Madroaa No. 7 Near Soutb"M _ 01... .1..... No.1 211-217 Cburch A9m1H (aucb . Del MIl) No.,' 230..232 Cburch A9m1H No. 10 NOftIIIft Putt IeDlor c:cr.r betwla , . c:cr.r Intt DowntoWll Parkin¡ StnICUI SoudIaIdt of1bfnl A_ . ,1nIt ImplOJ'ft Partin¡ Lot ~ordIIidt of' SII'Ht WIlt 0I1n1entcdoI1 wfdI '0III'Ib A_III - /3- ;Jp PAlUClNG IŒŒRS. PAIUCING ME'ŒIl ZONES AND P£RMIT PARXlNG Qçter ID.S6 10.s6.030 Metllr _EP-Widuocl·Re,u1atioN pDeralIy. Punuant ro the authority ofVehide Code Section 22508, plrking merer zones and the nte of fees for such zones u heretofore established by ordinançes are readopted upon those public parking 1011 and streell or parts of streell u described in Section 10.56.040 and Schedule Xllnached hereto and mlde I part of this chapter. in which zones the parking of vehicles shall be recWlted by parkinS meten between the houn .pecified in said Schedule XI of any day ucepr SUndays and public holidays. (Ont 243613.1991; Old. 973 11 (part). 1966; prior code 119.17.1(1.». 1056040 Meter laa. ~"~d '-I'~lI1e XI. Nuds Ufdot t- In accordanCe with Section 10.56.030 of this chapter, parkins meter zones are herebyesrablished upon those public parking 1011 mcs Itreets or portions ¢ Itreell described herein In which parkin¡ of vehicles shall be recWated by parkinS meten between the hour. specified In Section 10.56.150 and upon the lip erected Ihereon, and for the duration specified below and upon the sips erected thereon. of any dayace¡;t Sundays or public holidays, u follows: Name Dr Street Berinnin.. At Endintf At IidL Duration Third Avenue Alftt'ldo Street -¡" Street East 2 hours Third Avenue Roosevelt Street -¡" Street West 2 bours Landis Avenue .,. SUeet 300 Ft. ftonb of EIW 2 hours aonb curbline or , hours of -¡" Street Church Avenue .,. Street -¡" Street IIW 2 hours or 9 hours . eG" SUeet 40 fL west of 100 fL east of Iou1h SO mlDuta west curbllnt of east curb1Int of .2 hours Tiùrd Awaue Qurch Awaue eG" Street 125 fL _It of 450 fL east of Nonb 1 hour or welt curbline of ...t curbline of 2 bours Tiùrd Awnue Tiùrd Awnue Gurett Awaue 100 fL IOIfth of . 150 fL DWth of NIl 2 boun . IOUth curbllne of Donb curbIfDe -¡" Street of T Street Park Way 100 fL west of 'I1IJnI Awmae HIS 1 hour . _It curbUne of 'I1IJnI Aftnue Del Mar Awmae ..,. S1net Cmter Street Jut 9 hours Madnma Itreet 1bInI AVIftUI 125fLeastof NIl 1 hour east curbllne of Third A_ .,. Street GaJrm Awaue Del Mar Awaue Nonh SO mImrtu or 1 hour þ't' J]r] ¡or2hours --_._----~."_.._--"--------_.__.~.._--- · Name or ~tr.et .erinnin. At Endinw At lids.. Duration . .,. Saut Church Avenue Del Mir Avenue Iou1h 2 bours Center Saut ThIrd Avenue Del Mar Avenue NIS 1 bour or 'bours Center Street ThIrd Avenue Del Mar Avenue Iou1h 1 bour · "E' SIrett Church Avenue Del Mar AftDue NIS 2 boun "E" Saut Ganm Avenue 100 tc. east of NIS 2bours east curb1ine of I.Inclil Slntt ~b1it Parkin. Lot Dunrieft No.1: Nonhwest comer of QurdI . Madrona , boun No.2: 200 block of I.Inclil . 4 boun 01' , hours · . No.3: Nonheast comer of LancIiJ . Davidson 4 boun 01' , boun No.4: Nonhwøt comer of Qwrcb . DaWIson 4 hours 01' , hours No. 5: Southwøt comer of Qwrcb . Davidson 4 boun or' boun No.6: Near Southeast comer of TbIrcI . Madrona , hours No.7: Near SoudIust comer of LancIiI . "I" 4 hours or 9 boun · No. I: 211.287 Church A_ (Church . Del Mar) 4 boun 01' 9 boun No. 9: 230.232 Churcb Avenue 4 hours 01' 9 hours No. 10: Nonnan Park Senior Center between .,. Slntr . Center Street 1 hour (Ord. 248812. 1991; 0r4. 243614. 1991; 0r4. 97311 (part). 1966; prior code 119.22.1 (part). 10M"'fIO....r ·II-ANII.~ . ·sct·.......JIL N e.&d 5 Upclo.t ..d · PursuaDt to Veblde CocIe Secd_ ZZSOIIII4 22519 11I4 fa ~ wbh SecdoIIIlo.J6.2'1O 11I4 10.56.210, public pukJna IOD 1.10 (pIrkIna meter 1OfttI) 11I4 die IØ1p1II1H pukfDa lot 011 die ...m Iide of.,. S1net west of 1ntenedi0ll wIdI ,ounb Avenue are also "!patH · pIIIIIIt parkinI.... ,... whida d!splayfn, appropriate paztIn, permits 01' tap IbaII be .aU0we4 to pet fa "'celIO IIIIIb4 for up to nine bours (aU day). (0nL 248813. 1991; 0r4. 243617. 1991; 0nL 213111,1985; 0nL 97311 (part). 1966; prior code 119.22.1 ~>. ß-t6 )J---.JP-- · Jft&fftJG ZONES'· ... JÞl.JG.60 ~IIIW: 10.60.010 a-hllot,-... CIIItI-'dDa.....\ -~·....II " -. 1G.60.CI2O QII1Ill'r~"'1 - - ~...Jr .... lG.60.CDO QII1I-'""p-r:.lw...~ ... _1).1_ I' .._,,~ 10.60.040 '- ............ w1llll"..Uecr .. lime 1ImIÞ-1rA. -. lG.60.05O Y"'_I-r~"'I_' Ute .... .... ....... pnbIbiÞ4 10.60.060 P-.rl--~"'I'!IC:- Ute .......~y-....k..A lG.6O.O'1O ~. -I-~ 8111bariRr. 10toot" IpecIIIJ--~,.......~...t ,_..... -LIII~ rH_"IJ·-~ Ute ......~ lG.60.OIIO r.-.t---Ute.wL\:&'........ lG.60.100 T-~ .1. --.....,-..... .. --- Ir~Qñ- "..v...Ao'~ 10..60.010 .,......1&.... t.... -. 11 .-II .... -. .....,. .- A¡\t ft'beœver 8IIJ "'Ift.~ .. r.olutlOD of the dty .. -.V-. 8Dd ......, S'tr i t 'a. ...,. .....0, ., Nnluli.. Uf,n .. JIlT --~-"TR' ,r die ~ ....... .., IIIÙ!iIII die _doll ofloadin¡- UId punnav Ioadin& _ u roUOWI: A% IIIJ place ID IIIJ ~.. diftrict, IIId tiIMwIIen In hat ollhe Ctl'ÙlC. .. IIIJ place ., IIUI~ . ID IroDt ., U7 11III . pilei wt4 for die . fIIIPOII of public UIIIIIbly. ludlloadin¡ _ tIIaD M IDdJcattd. II)' ,.uow paiDt upon die .., 0111I CUItIIID aiel -. 11I4 ......av 1oadin¡lOna IbaII M IDcJ clttd II)' whitt paiIIr upon die .., of III CIIItIIID taIcI _. In DO ...nt thalllIIOI't dwI on,·W ollht total cUrtI IIII¡tb ID III' Wock M "I rIM tor IUCb pIIIpOIII. (Ore\. 973 11 (pan). 1966; prior code 119.12.1). . IG.60.CI2O Qñ ......... ~ ~... .... Appllanø tor . curb loadinllOllt pen út tIIaD pi)' die IttquIrtd Ftt(l). __ 2S0611 (pan). 1992; Ore\. 1110 11. 1971; Or4. 1205 12 (pan). 1969; prior codt 127.1102). . ltt( 030 Qñ - .. r CtI.I8 ....1. A' _lId__ II·' . L '.wi. Mol A. WbeDever· 8IIY "'1...- ..' _1UtIOD or die de, "--r¡;..- ... IIeIc:rIbea fIIIÜII .. at,.....". re¡uI.tiODI. IUbject to die pi'oYIIIcIIII _ _It't'" 01 tbIa . cllapter. die de,. -at- II audlørtzed to ,lace dlefoUowlD¡ añ.- . Strilt' A. YAL._._ .1 tIIJ 1111II11I ::~=-::~ ..¡: :::::~Zi~¡¡~æ;'i! .......1iIDI,...bjlet...... ,.J.JI"... ..llIIfuri.., ;,... _j.UJ· . .....,.. _ markInp .. ~_ ..w parIdDa . 11III..1'11 1'tJ'.'....-,. aIeI-'dDp . 11Ift die ....-"'1" lit fonb beniII: 1. ... __ DO ttoppfDa, 11I/I""'1. parIdDa.IIIJ" aapt. .... ..... "'....VtbIde Code. - acepc dial. ......,..,.. 1M................ ...... a. YeUow __ DO ..,.,.Ia¡. 1IIII0I1.,.itdn¡ . ., lime ....1-_. - ...... III .... ., ., ., _.,. '\lll4aJlIllclIaoUcII,. .... U7 pIIIpOII ... dIaD die ..._ . -"""'I tl fln"lprl .lIIItmm. ...~.Wtd that "1oadin¡.1IIIIotI4In¡ tl,...,...... DOC -- ... dIaD ..... ...... IIId "'''''', . ......... flllIIIttriaIt ... dIaD ...,.....; J. WbIte ....... _ .."Ia¡. -""w . puIdD¡ .... ., pIIIpOII.... dIaD "dID;. .........." ., ........ . .. .. ~ tl "'111IinI1IIII1 .. .. ~ ..n.... wIIidI .... lilt acetd ..... IIima*, .xii M1rkdoaa . apply MCIA. - .... .. ala .... ., ., .., aapt SllllÛylIlldIaoUcll,. -== Nltriclhao IlIaD appIJ .11I ..... ... tuda ... .. ......,........_.n_. . ......dle1' -..~ . . 4- GNa __ _ p ~,..... ...........dIaD ....... - ..,.... ~..£ ... ..... .... .. III .... _ .,..,... ....,. .. ...... .. WbIII.. m, -II-. . mIIuW ... dill dIçW, lilt .... -1IIIJtinp .. .. ...... - ..- abaI1..,. 11IM. put. wbIcJe +-.., IUCb IeJIIIIe _1IIIIIdIII""ltI-.,., . . .,....~.I_.,dIIt..n'-- ~ ) 7--]3 (Old. 97311 (pan). 1966; .... ....ll'.12.Z). . ~ 10.60.070 Bus _-" t--rifto auIboriry. Strike. Co!AAdl , The city 11lIneil mlY establish by resolution the locltion of bus IGnes opposite curb spice for the loadin¡ and unloadinl. of buses or common carrien of passenlers. and ..Id IOnes shall nonnally be established on lite far .ide of an IIItersection. (Ord. 973 11 (pan). 1966; prior code 119.12.6). 1060010 S¡i ¡.....t ....~.h...¡", ,.- - .....t.t...---·.z.oc.dOll-Hours ,,~ NItrictioDs. strl .. Co......crl The city MIlA sil mlY. by resolution, establisb special pIIHIIler loadinllOnes. not more than .ixtv feet iIIlen¡tb. Ioclted between two Ipprowl portJble .IIN in front of or aeljlcent to. anel within lite projecteel . nal propeny bollltclaries of any church, lItelter. dub or place of public ~bly. Salel .Im Jball be . provieleelanel paiel for by lite church, 1beater. dub or place of public ptherinl for which they are useel. and Iba1l be of a aize and desi¡n approved by !be city enrineer. SpedaI"'..."er loaelin, _ sball be III dec:t d\øin, 1It01e boun anel days when lite a:peelitious loaelinl or unlOlelinl of passenlers II nquu-.eI III COMmon with public ptherinp at the locltions for which they are establisheel. anelno operator of any vehide .hall stoP.ltalleI or park .alel vehicle in any such lÞIIe when the approveel siJIII, u herein provieleel. are in place, for any perioel of time lonler than is nteessary for 1be load in, or unloadinl of pIIHIIlers and in no event to exceeel three minutes. (Orel. 973 11 (part), 1966; prior code 119.12.7). lQ.60.0P0 PuMn1 JPI!I .u.e ._b~· No Cho.l\c;,u 1"0 1'his Set-TIon No operator of any vehicle aha1IltOp. ltaIIeI or park saiel vehicle foJ' any period of time lonler than is ItteelSary for lite loadinl or unloadin, of pu_en,ers anelnot to aceeel three mlllutes It any place between ponable .ims placeel widùn Ïhe projecteel real propel'ty boundaries of any lIItelemkin, establishment. private reslelence or any pub1ic or private place It a/1y time durinl or within fony minutes prior 10 the beJinnlnI of any funeral or funeral service. unless the +rator of .alel vehicle is dineteel by or has recelveel permllSion for the director or other person in charJe of such funeral. or funeral service 10 park such vehicle in such place. The clirector or person in dwre shall place prior 10 lJ\eI dllJ'Ùll the time limit herein speclfieel twò ponable .ims of a .ize anel clesim approveel by the dry enrineer. one It elch enel of such funerallÞlle upon lite .ldewalk or on the ..vement area within two feet of 1be curb. (Ore!. 97311 (pan). 1966; prior code 119.12.9). 10.60.100 Taicab f" Ills lat.lle"'-- ~ DIIÜII.uae· l!.:dMw Str i Iœ Coc..,.C,; I . The city "!IInil, by resolution. 11II)' esublish the location of tuicab 1W\cIs. 'the curb lIIIface within each IUÌcab lanel ahal1 be painted wbite! Del marked -ruicab Srand" In black Iefterin¡, or sball lie dasi¡nateel by si¡ns "I"" and_ _1'1" ....eI by dI. dry 1ftIIneer· No operator of any ..... other than a IUÌcab . aut_obD. for bin Iba1l park .-w ftbicl. III such IUiclb stand. (Ore!. m 11 (pan). 1966; JIrior code 119.12.10). 8ICWDISIU -. .1 10.72 1o.n.11O ,~. t I r - ...WI- . - .....~ ".:. . .~-- St...¡JC& C.&Mc:f I '11M dtJ ...sllIII)'. bJnroludc, ~itb blcydepl1tJn¡ -- ill.... adJaCClUUM curbs. DOt DOn dIan 1biny.sIz feet illlen¡th, II MClnary to prvftd. fIcI1idel for 11M tempOraJy parkin¡ of biqdes 4IuriDJ such IIourI of such Ù)'S II die city '_"18 ·"'aII dercmiDI. Wbar.nw a biqde parkin¡ 10M is 10 _b1ished, lit. dry enaJneer is audIoriIacIi to pI_ qpropriara alps PInI·DOdce dIat padIIDa " CIdMr fthIc1es II pnihiblre4 cIurizII such IIoun "!such ..,.. and DO ..- ahal11top.1IIII4 . park any ftbicle oilier dIan alricyde iII·such 10M wbID IIiII alps .. ID pIaa, IODIrII)' to 11M ~ . ..~J'sIoa. " such alps. (Ord. 164111 (pIn)..197S).~ ; ;? - JI ._~,.._-,-_._._, . ..-..-. .-...... --"'--'--'--- '--'~~----'--- ~xhi bit F ! ~~~; -... - ! j ~I¡]~~ ~'3j,;.c ~ "" ~ fcf ~.~ j! ~~~ ~ .! j ¡...r.- ~I"="·£·i §! Æ ~~ð"'j jJ:;~~J~ VIS ..~~f r¡.!!.!!N ct5 VI'" CI)_ c. <1S~~1 I!, .... 11:I - ø j ~ 15 N > r. ~ : JS ! - . ¡- i~J of¡ < !ij- i~ J ~ III! c:: ","c ~ en _ .2 ~~- ~ð~ðg .! III - . S ~~J ~j18~- ¡i~~c:J ¡ - r. _OIllCaG ~ ! :i~r. ~ ti ~ . )1 J -8 . II! J "~S ! Ih - J ~ u z,!! I i I~ u "-~ .!! t¡§ ! t/¡ð~ ::: ... _Þi Ni y-r /} -'3~ e -- --- - - n · · · - This Page Blank - · · ~ 13~3¡' , E)(ni bit 6- . Item 8 dlI{mwuuulwn - September 2.1994 File: KY·158 . TO: Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney VIA: John Uppitt, Director of Public Works ~ FROM: Ctiff _, Deputy Pub"' Wmb DmtŒ!COy_..¡' SUBJECI': City Council Policy Delegating Additional Authority to the Safety r-nmi..C¡on (Counc" Referral 1267 and 2557) , Attached for your review and comments is a proposed Safety Commission Council procedure establishing a new process for the Safety ec-m;uion and City Engineer on matters of vehicular and pedestrian safety and ¡ranting authority to the Safety Commission to approve the iDstaUation of traffic control devices recommended by the City's Traffic Engineer. On November 15, 1988 and FebruaJ)' 22, 1992. the City Council directed the City Traffic Engineer '0 work with the Safety Commission in developing a process that would provide ¡reater authority co the Safety Commission in dealing with traffic ..fety issues. Their direction is noted on the attached Council Referrals 1267 and 2557. Traffic Engineering staff met with the Safety Cmnmission on numerous OCC.siODS. (see attachment) to discuss mous options in a~p1ishiDg the City Council's objective. As a result, traffic staff prepared the attached Draft Traffic Safety ('.ftmmission Policy. This policy which has received endorSement from the Safety Commission will require certain changes in thè Municipal Code on traffic matters which presently require a Council resolution or ordinance. Accordingly. please advise us on the legal COITeCtDess of OIIr draft Safety Commission Council Policy. Additionally, we will need your assistance in moctifyiDg the Municipal Code to allow the Safety ('.œImission authority to affect the provisions of the proposed policy. To assist you in this endeavor, we are providiDgyou with suUested amendments to applicable sections (Jït1e 10) of the Municipal Code. The information you provide 111 will be ino.;(l1J101ated in oar A-I13 request for CaancD action. Jfyou Deed to discuss this item, please caD Frank Rivera, .AIIoc:iIte Traffic J:.ftpeer at 691-5237 or Hal Rosenberg. Traffic Engineer at 691~5116. We would appreciate nceiviDg your ."...,ments and re-mended Code changes by Friday, Sqtember JO, 1994 to aDo. 111 to meet oar agenda dvtUme for the October Safety C-mtmon meetin¡. JIXR:fp . A....~WlMau: EdIa'bit A - Draft Po1icy I!:du'bit B . CøIIIIciI Refcrrü 126'7 ø4 2557 Bdu'bit C _ Sa!~ty ~ 0IaDciJ PoJicJ Mec1iD& NotN dated 6I%1~ Elhibit D . Sa!~ty CøllllllllllOII PoJicJ #110.09 _1 . . ElhibitE.AIr-"-ðC.V." ·...llCW~TilkIO ~ J..J-- J;; - ._.... vUI'''' . .---- ---.~_. ---- - -------- -- -- ------ · · · - This Page Blank - · ~ /3~;¡~ [)Chi bit H- Safety Commission Minutes Februlry 13, 1992 Page 3 Frink Riverl Ilid he WIS unlwlre of Iny increase In Iccidenta et thillocetion Ind Hid he repo" on Iny changes et the next mllting. . He' Rosenberg Ilid stiff has looked It en Interim stop control It the Interlection. However, the widening of OtlY Lakes ROld his begun, end due to construction, much of the treffic will be detoured In the er.. over the next few months. Item S Çommissioner Chidester Isked If the treffic Ilgnll Imþrovementa et 1-5 Ind Pllomar would extend to Industrial Avenue Ind the Irea between the trolley tricks IndBroldwlY. HII Rosenberg Ilid thlt this project will Improve the on end off rempl of 1-5 It Pllomer only, However, there is I project being proposed for the Irll between the Pelomlr Station end Broadway end the developer will be required to put In Itreet Improvementa. .9. Chute Vist.. Police Deollrtment Tr.ffic SummerY far Oetober . Deeember 1991 Distributed for Commissioners Informltion. 10. Joint Me.tino between Safetv Camml..ion and Cltv CouneD HII Rosenberg Hid thlt he WIS unsure of \Wilt the City Council wished to dilculs with the Sefety Commission. He luggested thlt one topic of the meeting might be to delegete more ruponaibility to the Commillion. Chair !lreden recelled thlt In prevloul Yllrs there WlS en egreement that If the Safety Commllllon end the Engineering Dlperunent egreed on I recommendltion, the City CouncIl would not overrule their decillon. HII Rosenberg Ilid there WIS e referral reglrdlng this, but It WII tlbled Ind no ection wlsever tlken. . . 11. Cancrete Overlay an lonk. Bien Orb,. south at Bonk. Road Frenk Riverl repo"ed the project Illcheduled to begin on April 20, 1992 Ind should be completed by June 12, 1992. The Commisslonerl Wire given I copy of the construction Ichedule. Co-Chalr Thomas elked \Wiet medium WII used for Idvertislng thil project. Mr. Rivera reponed that the loci' neWlplpe" Ind trede pepera Wire used. The City and Shell Oil Compeny will be Iplitting the constrUction COlta. Shell paid for the "Ign of the lntlre roadwlY end the CIty wlU be providing frIIlnapection on the project. 12. AIDhalt Cane,.,. OvertlY Proar.rn" .'.12 \ Per Chair Brlden'l request, Frank Rivera delcrlbed elllgltor plvement and lurvey Will monumenu to the Commllllon. Mr. Rlvere relponded to I concem made by Co-Chelr Thomallt the November 1991 meeting regarding ItrIplng on Bonite Roed jult list of Eelt FlOWlr Streit. He checked Into chlnglng theltrip* Informed that Bonitl Road will be overleyed lOOn Ind theltriplng changed Itthet time. . ) J ~ ;J J -------~_._,--~--_._.,.__. -...--- · '- . MINUTES OF A WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION Thursday. March 19, 1992 Employee Lounge 7:00 p.m. Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER · Roll Call: Present: - Commissioners Thom... Koester. 01 . '. _. Matacla. and Pitta Excused Absence: Commissioner Padilla, Braden <¡~..~ . Alao Present: Harold Rosenberg. Traffic Engineer; Frank Rivera. AI.ociate Traffic Engineer ' Staff di.cu..ed the Role of the Safety Commission. Thi. work.hop was held to di.cu.s proposed ordinance change. to change the Commission from an advi.ory group to one with authority. · The Commi.sion discussed the possibility of revising the Board./Commission./Commlttees Handbook description of the Safety Commission. The Commissioners felt that the Information regarding hazardous waste matters .hould be eliminated, The Commission ha. never dealt with hazardous materials and felt that the County Hazardous Material. office Ia better prepared for to handie this function. The Safety Commi.sion mentioned that they were In favor of changing the scope of the Commission to one of authority and how this would reduce the length of City Council agend.. and giva .taff and the public a Quicker turn around time responding to requllta. An appllls procedure would occur If an Item received three 'no' votes and four 'yes' votes. The.. Items would be forwarded to the City Cou!\cil. If Items p....d by unanimous vote or one or two 'no' · votes, it wu not an issue for the City Council to act on. If an item w.. not p....d due to a tie in voting, then it could be put on the next agenda only If thera wa. no agreement reached. Unanimous votas by the Safety Commi.sion could not be appealad. . '- Another IIternative to tha appeal. procass was that the Item could be put on tha City Council agenda If a City Council member received a 415ths vote to put It on the agenda. A citizen could appeal to the City Council In writing to the City CouncU and having the City Council docket theltam on an upcoming agenda. Budgetary constraInts _ra di.cussed. Some QUlStion. were: · 1) Would the Safety Commission and .taff be able to approve an item II long II the FIScal Impact Is .... than .1.5007 21 What about Item. which ere alrlldy budgated for7 Traffic .Ignal.. apecial.tructure.. suc~ II aign bridges. pedestrian bridges would probably need City Council approval. The Safety Commission was al.o con. ide ring changing the name to 'Traffic Safety Commission.' The Traffic Safety Comml.sion wou!d only hllr item. which occur In public rlghta-of-way and r.late to _UlS of public nf.ty. -.." · ~ J;> ~¡jtJ . . . .... Slfety Commission Minutes Alrch 19.1992 Page 2 -. A consensus WIS Felch.d to d.v.lop rules Ind procldures to glvI thl Slf.tY Commission flnl' Ipptoval. It Is recomm.nded thlt Ippells to the CitY Council be limited, ADJOURNMENT M.eting Idjourned It 8:30 p.m. . R.spectfully Submitted. ~¿~,- Frank Rivera. Acting Recording Secretary . . . . . .........,.,.,..,"1.... - . . .~ ) J': t// ----"..- ~_._-,,--".._---- - - -----_. ---._-. · Slfety Commission Minutes" May 14, 1992 Page 7 I 9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. - STAFF REPORTS · 10. '991·92 CIP Status AeDDrt· Distributed for Commissioner Information. . 11. Chula Vilt. '01lel Dlaartment Traffic SummarY for Mareh 1192· DistrIbuted for Commisl!oner Information. 12. Itatul R.Dort Allev South of ! Str..t hetween Chureh and Del Mar Avenue. . Distributed for Commissioner Information. · 13. Statui RIDDrt Dn Shell on Car Wash at Ronlta alln Drive . Distributed for Commi.sioner Information. . OTHER BUSINESS 14. Commlsslone, CDmm.~ttI None. , 15. Commlsston WOrk,hOD Staff dlstribut.d a SUlWI report to the Commisllon reglrding the roll of the Safety Commllllon. · Vice-Chalr Thom.. dillgrHd with SUlff', Int.rpretatlon of wfII1 the CIty CouncII.xprellld 11 the joint melting on February 27,1882 and reQuaatld a copy of thl mlnutl' of that melting. Hal RoIInbtrg IIld SUlff did not Intend to Quote Council, but thoUOht their overall objective wal to delegl11 more authority to the Slflty Commilllon. Vlce-Chalr Thomalllld OptIon 2 walltaff'l raeommendation, where he felt Option 1 wal more wfII1 Councilman Malcolm 'XØfIII.d at the muting. OptIon 2 would give more authority to ltaff and leave the Saf.ty CommIuIon II an acIviaory group. · CommIslloner Padilla concurred with Vlce-Chalr Thomas. He IlIeI OptIon 2 favoracI CouncII,ltaff, and IIItly the Safety CommIulon and that II not what CouncI reQUlltld. Frank RIvera IIld thll report II only a draft which thl CIty EngInur hal not approved. It wal for the Commlulon', information and Input In order to rKlive comments prior to aenclllIII h to Council. The report would be amended to nflect 111I CommIlllon'a comments. Hel 'Rollnberg IIld ltaff II looking for a COIIIlnsus by thl Commlulon In order to write a report to Inform Council al to which direction the changl wal going. Undlr OPtion', h would give the Slflty ( Commlsllon final declllon meklng authority and would require a change In the CIty Chaner. Thi. f~ reQuired review by the Chanlr Review CommlttH and If the Council wanta to procud with the /.3 /" recommendation, chang.. In the Chaner would have to be ptaced on the ballot for cltlnn approval. · ~ Thl chang. would not only glva the SafetY Commllllon authority to direct ltaff to perform certain actions, but also allow the Commlaalon to Install traffic control devlcel that currently reQulrl . relolutlons from the Council. An ordlnsnce would have to be written that the CIty Council wal giving . , Safety Commiaalon Minute. May 14, 1892 Page 8 euIhority to till Safety Comminlon to lnatall parking algn., speed Umit Ilgn., ItOP ligna, and whatever ..till Council del.gat.d. Mr. ROlen~rg thought the Commillion wlnted to rely on ltaff for the lnItIIIa1ion of 1rIff1C control device. rather then take It upon thernaelvlI. Shirtay Buxton read to the Commla.ion the mlnutea of the OInt meeting of the City Council Ind the .fltV CommiIIIon dlted FebNlry 27, 1992, specifically, Councllmln Malcolm'l Intent Ind CouncIlman Moore'l commenta regardingltop algna. Hal Roaenbarg Aid hlacceptad thlt the City Council would probably pref.r Option 1 Ind aak.d the CommIaaion to dl.r.gard the ltaff recomm.ndltlon. He liked the eommlnlon If there WII I COIIIIIIIUI on en option. Vlcl-Chalr Thoma. Aid h. did not want the re.ponalblUty of InItllllng trlffic algnll., but could dill with "'way atop aigna and 11I0 there WII a budg.t aapact to be conald.red. Hal Rotenberg aaid that the Commi..lon could make I recommendation reglrding capital project., but . It didn't _rily mlln that .taff would have to Implement the recommendation. For .xample, If a cItiz.n were to Ilk for I traffic aignal and ataff agreed with Inltllling a Ilgnal but It did not rink w.1I In till ov.rea City renklng, the Safety Commillion còuld direct ltaff to give It I higher priority In the budget procell. But currently, the Comml..lon could not glv. .taff direction to prepare pI.n., bacaUII they CIIinOt appropriate funda. How.v.r, the Comrnlaalon could direct ltaff to reQUllt fundi from Council. :ommiIIloner Matecla felt ateff waa looking It till. procel' thinking that the CommIuIon would -'"'" them. H. AW that Council wanted to reliev. th.maelvel of routine ItarnI and give the re.ponalblllty to ltaft auppon.d by the Commla.lon. Commlllloner Matecla referred to the April 9, 1992 mlnuta of the Safety Comnillllon ~I arding the lability 11I11I and Aid that It ...mId too negatift. . . Hal Roa.nberg relponcled thlt wIIIn ItIff gOlI to court to provide taltlmony, 1hty are lllead what atancIardl Wire ulld for the lnatallation of a traffic control device. If It II I renclom cIecIaIon with no c:ritñ, till City could be guilty of creating a dangarOUl condition. Commit.1oner Matacll Aid thlt If the Safety CommIIIion Wire given authority, the 11m QUIItIon hi would .... would be to haft ltaff d.fIne their atandard. for inatalllng control device.. VIce Chair Thomaa Aid hi recalled Mayor 'Nader II "",geating that till CommIIIIon andltlff look It till current wariant ayltlm for polllble changll. . ShIrley Buxton rod till ACtion from "" mlnutel QUOtIng Mayor NacIar. .... Roaenbarg ..lead If there _ COIIIIIIIUI on Option 1. The CommIIIIon aaId there_ cons_a en Option 1. ADJOURNMENT MSUC (KoatarlPlttll. adjourn It 1:31 p.m. . \ ""pectfully Submitted, )J-f)~ i/¿~~l~ hirl.y au on, R.cording Secrltary _~ I. .....,.aa.IM -. - ._.._ '.... _u" _ ____......_.'_.....__ .n...________· -_____.__. . · Slfety Commlulon Minutes June 11. 1992 Plge 4 Frenk Rlverl recllled thlt It thlt time" the Safety Commlulon tabled thfa Item until SR.1i4 WII completed. He Informed Mr. Stell Ind Ms. Attaway that thfa Item will be on the Igendl for July 9, 1992. STAFF R£PORTS · 9. 1991·92 CIP Status R800rt· Dlatrlbuted for CommIaIIoner information. 10. Chul. Ylsta Police Dea8rtment Traffic SummArY for AD'. 1992. DinibutecI ~ CommJllioner Information. 11. Statui R_nart an Shen 01 eAr WAsh at Banlt. ftlan Drive - Diltlibutld for Commlllloner Information. OTHER BUSINESS · 12. Roberta Rul.. of Order - frink Riverl distributed three Roberti Rulli of Order bookletl that he hed purchelld. Ther..re six . more on order. Th. books Wlr. cllatrlbut.d to the n.w Chelr Bob Thomas Ind Vie. Chllr St.ve Pldflll WId Olli. Brld.n. 13. Ca",mh.lan., CantrnMlta None. 0 14. eðmml..lon WorbhOD Stiff distributed .nother clreft report In ruponae to CouncIl Reft",.. 1287 .nd 2557 reglretlng the . . RpIe of the Slfety Commialon. Vie. Ch.lr Thomll uld that aInct h. did not... My re.1 diff.renceln recommendltlona, he Wlsreedy to recommend Option 1 which would requlr. . chenar amendment to mike the Saf.ty Commfaslon . declllon making group. . . MSC (TbomaslPlt1al to acc.pt Option , and prep... I report to the CIty CouncI. Approved'" with Commlllloner Chlclllter voting no. ADJOURNMENT MSUC (KOIIterlMltlClel to acIJoum It 8:30 ,..... . "eap.ctfûay Submlttecl. ~. JhlU~rßII K.f8t-./' . Shlrl.y Buxt . R.cordlng Secretary / J--1( .;MI'I'f1tM"...... ...- Safety Commiuion Mlnutll July 8. 1882 Page 4 OTHER BUSINESS 10. Ravlew ef ....N ea"""'-alan Annu81 lumnulfV of Aetfvltltl. 11. Attand.,ce Lkt fa, FY '..'.12 . 12. Cernmkalona, Ca....._nta None. 13. Cðmrnll:slan Wðl'UhðD SUff will be going to the City Council on approximately July 28, 1892 rKOmrnendlng I change to the City Cha"er mlklng 1ha Safety Commllllon In Ictlon group rather than In Idvllory group II the CommÎllÎOn requllted and decIcIacI on It Ita MIY and June 1892 meetlngl. Chair Thomas IfICOInGId 1ha CommIuIonara to attand 1ha City CouncIl meeting when thIIltam II preunted. . ADJOURNMENT USC CKMlterlPacllIaJ to acIjoum It 8:30 p.m. flltlpectfully SubmItted, ."~~:d:!/:- - - ~. JJ~J/~ .~.~... .... ----._-_.-~-~ ..._-.. _.". -.-------.... ~.._-----..- · Safety Commission Minutes June 10, 1993 Pale 2 OTHER BUSINESS 7. Commissioner Comments . · Chair Thomas asked Frank Rivera the status of additional responsibilities for the Safety Commission as per Council direction. Frank Rivera respondeclthat Proposition L was defeated in 1992. That was the bill that would have liven the Safety Commission decision makinl status. However, the City Attomey's office indicated to staff that they could proceed with chanlinllOme of the duties of the Safety Coinmission. The City Council wanted the Safety Commission to look at the all-way stop policy for possible revisions which would make the restrictions a little more lenient. He sUllested meetinl more often in order to accomplish the task. He sUllested meetinl one additional time per month and possibly include a brief workshop at the end of the relularly scheduled meetinø. Chair Thomas asked for sUllestions on when Commissioners could meet. It was qreed that the Commission · would hold a workshop meetinl on July 1, 1993 at 7:00 pm to discuss the al/-way stop warrant system. Frank Rivera said he would send out a letter remindinl Commissioners of the meetinl and announcinl the location. ADJOURNMENT Chair Thomas adjourned the meetinl at 7:28 p.m. to workshop meetinl at Jakes Sooth Bay Restaurant. Respectfully Subm itted, · ~,<3ú¥~ Shirley Buxton ecordinl Secretary _IGIJ.MW on... · · ~/7/,/t - . MINUTES OF A WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION Thursday, July 1,1993 Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Present: Chair Thomas, Vice Chair Padilla, Commissioners Braden, Chidester, Koester, Matacia, and Pitts Also Present: Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer; Ftank Rivera, Associate Traffic Engineer 2. OAAl COMMUNICATIONS - None. . 3. Discussion: Proposed Changes to policies and Municipal Code Staff discussed City Council's intent to shorten its meetings. The City Council wanted more authority gtanted to the Safety Commission. The intent by the City Council required teviewing and revising the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Council Policies, warrants and establishing an appeals process. Commissioner Braden asked about the history of policy t11().09 . Safety Commission and the Design Review Comminee and the intent. for 11()'06 (Communications Board and Commissions), the Commssion wanted the definition of "Minute Action & Minority Report." Discussion was held on how other cities handle Traffic Safety Commissions, SANTEC & Resource Conservation Commission. On the B/ClC Handbook, the Safety Commissin wanted to delete item '3 on Page 20 regarding hazardous waste issue. ... Commissioner Comments· None. 5. ADJOURNMENT at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, . ~~ffJl -- Shirley BUKton, cording Secretary , . Sl:WlTl'Ø7O"J.MIN UNOFFICIAL MINUTES _"J - }PJ1 /;J-ifl ----------_...---_.__..~,-~---- --- · Safety Commission Minutes " July 8, 1993 Page 7 14. ADJOURNMENT to the Safety Commission workshop meeting - Proposed Changes to policies and Municipal Code at 8:52 p.m. · The Commission reviewed the following Council Policies at the workshop. . Policy '102~ Block Parties No Action Taken Policy '110-06 Communications - Boards and Commissions No Action Taken Policy '11 o;og Safety Commission No Action Taken Policy #465~1 Public Service Direction Signs on Public Streets Staff to re-word the Polic:y in minor locations Policy #478-02 Installation of Traffic Signals No Action Taken Policy #478-03 All-Way Stop No Action Taken Policy #576~7 Street Treet Maintenance & Monolithic Sidewalk Definition of Regular Trimming discussed Policy '576-15 Street Closing No Action Taken · · Shirley Buxton, Recording Secretary · ~."- ·uw ..... t UNOFFICIAL MINUTES JÞUr )]---'I~ · MINUTES OF A WORKSHOP MEETING I OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION Thursday, August 5, 1993 Council Chambers 7:05 p.m. Public SelVices Building CALL TO ORDER ,. RollCall: Present: Chair Thomas, Vice Chair Padilla, Commissioners Braden, Ind Matacia Absence: Commissioners Chidester, PillS, and Koester . Also Presen1: Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer; Frank Rivera, Associate Traffic Engineer 2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- None. 3. Discussion: Ptoposed Changes to policies Ind Municipal Code General discussion by Commissioners on the following Council Policies: Policy '576-08 Median Lanscaping Policy Policy '576-11 Street Lighting. City's Financial t ,Policy '576-13 Sidewalks· Maintenaoce Policy '576-14 Curb Painting Policy .576-16 Installation of Pedestraln Crosswalks No Idion was taken. 4. Commissioner Comments· l'oIone. . 5. ADJOURNMENT It 8:00 p.m. o, Respectfully Submitted, . ./3tu/~ - Shirley Buxto cordlnl Secretary . I ... ma.4...... - UNOFFICIAL MINUT~ ~ /J- J --..--.- ~ _..._.._.._----,-_._.,~ ,.... -_.~---- __ _ n_ -~---~----_._-~-- ._._.~ ....-..- .safety Commission Minutes · February 10, 1994 Page 3 STAFF REPORTS . 11. 199],1994 CIP Status ReoorI . Distributed for Commissioner Information. / , 12. Chula Vista Poli~ Dmartment Traffic SummarY for October and N_Mr 1993 . Distributed for Commissioner Information. · . 13. 1993 Dlnst of Traffic LMÎslation . Distributed for Commissioner .Information. OTHER BUSINESS 14. ·.UrmK ðn th~ RftJld to PrðhI@lÞSolvinR" . San Di@C!o Union Tribun~ Chair Thomas alced If staff had any comments reprdlnl the Irticle. · Hal Rosenbel'l said that speed humps were not considered I traffic control device. The Califomia Traffic Control DevIce Committee Ittempted to set I standard and .Idopt speed humps In their manual. The Committee felt that it was not a safety device Ind thoulht It mlcht constitute a hazard and did not Idopt It Cities installed speed humps, but at some risk. If In injury CICCIIrred as a result of I speed hump, a city would , have a difficult time provinl in court that It was a standard device and was successful In promotinl traffic safety. He said he has preferred to not to Install humps In the City of Chula Vista. 15. CommK,lonø' CðmIMllts Commi.ssioner Koester liked the status of the policy Ilvlnl the Safety Commlulon more luthority (per Its meetinl with Council) and asked If was belnl wor1ced on or If It WIS Inactive. Frank Rivera said he had wor1ced on the project, but that It WIS a slow process. The Municipal Code needed to be updated. He hoped to live the Commission periodic Prolress reports. Commissioner Matacil asked If there was somethinl the Safety Commlulon could do In order to expedite the process. . Frank ltivera said the project required I lot time and that many times staff WII handlinl citizen requests and It WII difficult to pt bide on trick to wor1c on the project. Commissioner Matlda said that former Councilmln Malcolm felt stronlly about aMnl the Commlulon more authority and asked If there WII any one Councilmember currently servllll who felt the same way. . frank Rivera said that he did not _I that was the Issue. Commissioner Matacil commented that the Safety Commission WII not II busy II In the past and asked If the population of Chula Vista, II well II Council, still wanted I Safety Commiulon.· .' Hal Rosenbel'l said Council wanted I Safety Commlulon and Council relied upon them for their advice, direction, and luidlnce. A few years back, the Safety Commission dealt with some very controverslllltems and Council WIS Inundated with public demands fot traffic Improvements that staff had recommended IplnS! . or those that the Safety ~.not ~ with. It ViIS thoucht It time that the COmml~IOI! S~ld /;J:5P UNOFFICIAL MINUTES Safety Commission Minutes ' February 10, 1994 I 'aSI 4 have authority 10 approve projects and relieve the City Council of some of the difficult hearinp. He reminded the Commission that the item. was taken to the wters and the wters did not want 10 amend the Charter 10 allow the Commission 10 have more authority. The City Attomey later ruled that the City could adopt a policy and Sive the Safety Commission authority. In the recent pàst, there had not been many controversl.lltems. In order for staff to write the policy, It was necessary to So throuSh every ordinance In the Municipal Code to amend them 10 live the Safety Commission aUlhorlty. He said staff would make II a priority If Ihe Commission pile lhat direction. Chair Thomas supportèd Commissioner Matacia's position and shared his frustration. He said 1 1/2 years was along time to have lhe issue continue. He asked If Mr. Ri~r. was the correct person to work on the project or If II could be It be delesated to someone else. He asked whal the Commission could do 10 get the matter ,resolved. Frank Riveta stated that part of the problem was that there was a vacancy In Traffic Engineering and staff had 10 double their duties. He told the Commission that he could brinsa status report 10 next month's meetlna and would consider making II a montlily agenda ilem. When he completed the chanae5, It would be forwarded 10 the City Attomey's Office for review. Chair Thomas said It was his undelStandina that at one time, the Item was stalled in the City Attomey's Office and now he was hearina that it had not lone to the City Attomey's Office. frank Rivera said the Issue was whether or not the City was leplly obliged 10 proceed wllh the Item because ! JIt wters had decided ¡pinst It. Hal R05enber¡ said the City Attomey pile permission 10 proceed wllh the Item, but staff was still In need of their assistance In structuring the policy so that the lepl issues were met. The ordinance sections deallna with traffic must be chanaed to live the Co.mnillsslon authority. The City Attomey's office Instructed staff 10 prepare a draft for their review. He would like 10 have the Attomey's Office write the ord.lnance and traffic staff would check lhe traffic portion. He said staff would gellOgether wllh the Attomey's Office 10 work on the policy and qreed that the Item should be placed on the alenda each month 10 1M the Commission an updale. Commissioner Matlcla saId the Commission did not have a !Deetlnaln December 1993 or January 1994 and commented on how few people s~owed up for the meetlnl. He queslloned If the Commission had qreed with staff's recommendations 10 such adearee that the people of Chula Vista did nol wanllO come 10 the Safety Commløion and asked If Council did not direct as many Item as In the past 10 the Commission. Chair Thomas asked who decided what Issues came before the Safety Commission and what the normal procedure was. Frank Rivera said the usual procedure was a written request. If a request was made 10 the Manaler, Mayor or City Council on a traffic Issues, It was automatically placed on the Safety Commission apnda. Stiff also IKtIved phone calls from citizens reprdlnl traffic control devices. When ~ IKtIved . call, staff usually met with the citizen in the field. Citizen complaints had decrused. He commented that over 80 notices were HI'It 10 residents on Halecrest Drive and there was one phoi1e call and two people came to the meetlna· Hal Rosenbell said there was croUP of ~idents from Halecrest DrIve It the orlgln.1 meellng'when staff was Ioøklna for direction. The ml fents _med 10 have been SIIlsfied with the .ttentlon 10 lheir problems. For I 'he past two years, the City had seen . reduction In bulldinl and therefore, problems that were ISsoclated with crafflc pattems In new street developments had not been _no If staff received. controversial development plan, II was brauchl to the Safety Commission for their review. )Y1:1. /3-5/ UNOFFICIAL MINI' ..-...--.--..--.....--..---. ..~--_.__...._._-----_. Safety Commission Minutes · February 10, 1994 ,( Page 5 \ Commissioner Smith asked hoW many people knew that the Safety Commission existed. He leamed about It when he had a prOblem and was willing to get involved. He said the Police Department must have received complaints ~bout speed ,~nd questioned If the Police Department recommended that citizens go to ~ Safety Commission meeting. Frank Rivera Ñted traffic engineering staff had monthly meetings with the Police Department ~nd were In constant contad with them. The Police Department had recommended In the past that staff look at certain · streets.. Staff tried to handle all requests as soon as possible. / Vice Chair Padilla said there would be times when the Chambers were filled with citizens and other times when it would not be. It was Council's responsibility for gettlnl the word to citizens about the Commission system. The Importantthinl was that there was a Safety Commlss.lon. The focus should not be on how many people came to meetings, but how the Commission could increase Its ability to p;IIrticip;llte In the process. Different councils would have different opinions on how things should work. The focus should be on how the Commission could better take the load off of Council. There shouldn't be any doubt on whether the Commission was needed. He felt It was appropriate for the City Attomey's OffIce to live traffic enlineerinl Ñff a sketch of where the policy should come from a legal point of view. ,He asked if it would make staff's job easier if a letter was written by the Commission to the Attomey's OffIce askinl them to take the lead on the issue and if It should be routed throulh the Council. · Hal Rosenber¡ said the Commission could tlke such an Iction through the form of I motion and felt that it would be best to write the letter diredly to the City Attomey's OffIce. I MS (PacllllaIICoeIter) to direct stiff to prepare I letter, under Chair Thomas's slpature, from the Safety Commission to the City Attorney, with I short explanation of the situation, request'" his assistance to draft . model or sketch outline polley that he believed _ consistent with law IS to how to better streamline 01' empower the Commlulon consistent with C-dl's diredIon and uk him to please make cantld with the CIty EnøIneøinI office and CDOlllllllte with them. Commissioner Matlc:i~ said the Commission was I "ruc:tion" commission and asked If they shouldn't be an . ldion committee. · Hal Rosenber¡ said staff did those thinas on I dilly basis by meetinl with citizens. Stiff received accident Ñtistia, spot c:IIec:ked locations, and made recommendations for Improvements. If It was In lood traffic enlineerinl judgement, stiff went ahead and performed the actions. He understood Commissioner Matlcia's comment, but did not feel It was their role to be an p~on problem type of commission. AMENDMENT TO MOnON: (Padilla, ..... to br MmId øllIIOtIan) to circulate. œpy øI the letter to Council. AppIj ,~ed 7.0. Commissioner Matldl aslced, from I policy stindpoint, If staff and Council were stili Iooklnl at the City as - . slNlI15,OOO populltionCity or I ¡rowin1300,OOO population City. · . Hal Rosenber¡ said staff _ COI\StIntly Iooklnl at ¡rowth for the City. There was I Ceneral Plan, the City was looklnl at a new freeway (5R-125) and Improvlnl the traffic p;IIttems. Commløloner Pitts said that In the Santi Cllritl and Irvine lreas, their safety commissions Were p;IIrt of the . . disaster preparedness plan. He asked the Recordinl Secretlry If the City of Chull Vista had such a plan anti if I Board, Commission Of Committee oversaw disaster preparedness. Shirley Buxton, Recordinl Secretary, Ñted that there was an OffIce of Disaster Services that coordinlted the fmerpncy Command Center and that to her knowledle they were not connected with any commission. _J)-S,;" ~ ÚNOFFICIALMINUTES · . Safety Commission Minutes February 10, 1994 ! 1Ie6 . Commissioner Smith asked if there Were more ways to let the public involved with Items that were beinl brousht to the Commission. .Wlth all the population of Chula Vista, if only three people showed up, the majority was not beinl heard. Hal Rosenbers said the Commissioners were lay people and should rely on staff for their expertise. If the Commission asked citizens to convey their problems, the dtlzens would respond with things such as slowing speed down, Installlnl stop signs, and other Items that would be based on emotion and perceptions of problems. Some things staff had control over and others they did not. He felt the Commission could not be more than a feactionary group. Commissioner Smith feh that people needed to be heard and that's what the Commission should be there for. frank Rivera suggested adding a paragrapJil in the Quarterly newsletter publidzlng the duties of the Safety Commission. Commissioner lierd sugested lookinl at makins public service Innouncements on local television news shows. Chair Thomas asked how the Safety Commission could be one of the contact commissions Involved in developments related to traffic engineering. "tal Rosenbers said the Safety Commission was part of the cunent review process throush traffic engineering ( Aff. The Commission could request that site plans be brousht to them for the review. . Chair TJilomas said that last year the Commission had an opponunlty to review plans In the deslS" phase and was slad· they had that opportunity. They wanted to be Involved on new developments to make the Commission more effective. . ADIOURNM£NT . 16. Adjourned at 8:24 p.m. to the Safety Commiøion meetinl scheduled for Mardi 10, 19M. Respectfully Submitted, . ~J~~ SJilirley Buxton co Inl tary . -.- _Of I ~ /J~Þ) UNOFFICIAL MINUTE' __...___.'.'.n_ ~._----- . .- Safety Commission Minutes March 10,1994 · Page S engineering perspective. The need for an all-way stop had been examined and It was not found to be warranted. Staff did not feel the bike lane should be removed and parking restored for safety reasons and the City was not prepared to install a signal .at the current time because there was not much traffic through the Intersection. Staff hoped she would agreed to forming the task force. Commissioner Koester asked If staff was going to install the delineators around the left tum pocket. Mr. Rosenberg said that staff would install the delineators promptly, install a stop sign at the north parking lot, · ~d trim trees In the median and that no adion from the Commission was needed. 7. R~PORT Safety Commission· Role of Safety Commission" Approval of Letter to City Attomey Frank Rivera presented staff's repon and asked If the Commission was stili Interested In pUBulng the Issue of becoming an authority-making body. Hal Rosenber¡ reviewed notes made by the City Attomey and It was his opinion that the Safety Commission . could be given decision making authority. Cemln laws required resolutions by the City Council, otheB did not. The Attomey's opinion was that a I~gislative body could delegate duties to traffic staff or safety commissions. That meant the Commission could adopt criteria. Coúncll usually approved traffic engineering . · Items on the consent calendar, which meant there was usually no disCussion and was considered routine. He j said if the Commission desired, staff would continue to finalize ~ plan that would allow the Commission to have the authority to Install some traffic control devices and also develop an tppeal process. Chair Thomas said he hoped to help City staff membeB and some of the problems they faced of having small problems go through Council. He commended Frank Rivera for all hIs work on the projed. He asked what staff's time frame was to present the Item to the City Attomey and what priority could be placed on the item 10 see that It was done In a reasonable amount of time. Frank Rivera said the Item had top priority. He would expedite as quickly as possible the ponion of the policy that dealt with traffic engineering. When staff was finished with their part, It would then be forward to the · City Attomey's Office. He did not know how much work would be required from the City Attomey's Office. . He would keep the item on the agenda monthly In order to update the Commission on a regular basis. , Hal Rosenber¡ said staff could bring an outline to the Commission in two months Me! If supponed by the Commission, would then be forwarded to the City Attorney's Office. ' . . CommlsslonerMltada tixplessed his concem that the Commlnlon not come across seeking power, but instead trying to help Council. He ~ted staff to express to other City staff the Commission's feelings. Hal Rosenber¡ said that when a Commlulon was given decision nllldni authority, that would give them power to override staff's recommendation, no different than Council might do. The Commission needed to decide if that was the kind of authorltyifld power they wished to possess. . , Commissioner Matacla said the Commission supponed staff in most cases IIId hoped that it helped Council. The Commission was JUdy 10 help the City by illuming more responsibility. . Hal Rosenber¡ said he understood the Commission's view point. He said that regarding the Eutlake item, staff reviewed il from a traffic engineering point of view. If the Commission were given authority, they could have decided to have staff Install an alloway stop even though staff recommended against It The Commission could only make recommendations 10 Council under the Qlrrent policy. Council viewed the Commission's recommendation highly. , fHW UNOFFICIAL MINUTES /:{/5'7 Safety Commission Minutes March 10, 1994 "qe6 Commissioner Koester asked If the Commission was solns to forward the draft letter to the City Attomey. Chair Thomas stated that the letter would be postponed. Commissioner Smith said that belnS a new Commlssloner,.he had many concems. The added power could decrease the flexibility In the Commission's decision malelns. With additional power, there were different responsibilities. He did not want to minimize citizen emotions, but wanted to be able to have leeway in decision maleins. As a citizen who was not elected, he felt he was representlnl Citizens with relard to emotional responses. If he were lImited by what staff recommended, and liability if he strayed away from that, he milht be Inclined to appl'Olll! staff's recommendation all the time. Vice Chair Padilla said reprdless of the authority sranted, the Commission stili needed to operate within the law. There was a built·ln safety device. He read from the minutes Of the joint workshop between Council and the Safety Commission of February 1992, "..Intent of Council to have traffic policies revised by Safety Commission. Some more emphasis could be placed on safety in sChools." The Safety Commission could let mOre Involved In talkinl with staff and having more public input Interjected into mathematical formulas. His observation from the Attomey's notes was that any chanses In policy woùld have 10 come from Council with input from the Safety Commission. Chair Thomas had concems whether the Commission would have enoush time 10 review the authority changes IS well as an appeal process. He iUllestedschedulinl a workshop to discuss the, Item. He was unable to vote on an item Of such Imponance withoutfunher study and the ability to ask questions. MSC (ThomasIICoester) to schedule May 12, 1994 as a worbhop meetlnS to dIscuø the policy of slvinsthe Commlølon _ authorhy IJId the appul process IJId IOJtpOne lIlY other .... 11_ to June 1994. Appoo_ ...., with CommiIIioner Pitb Ibsent. I. o ORAL t:OMMUNICATlONS . Nane STAFF R~PORTS 9. 199:1-'9" CIP Statui Rmort Hal Rosenbera reponed that staff was 'In the process of finalizlns the clesll" of the trlffic sll'llllt Otay Lakes load and Ciotham Street and construction was scheduled for June 1994. 10. 0Iub VIda Police Denartment T~fflr Sum....... far D«-emher 199:1 . Distributed for Commissioner Information. ðTHfR IUSINUS 11. -... CiIwwhIe PrølerII ~rank Rivera updlted the Commission on several projects. Staff was currently worklns on I lIC uest for I .,roposed car wash It the Shell Station on Telesraph CanyonRold and Halecrest Drive. At the northeast comer of £1st H Street and Paseo Del Rey, I larle pet supply store with sroomlns center WIS proposed lion, with I restaurant and smlll retlllltore. The KoMan construction WIS contlnulnSlnd WIS expected to open in '1111994. The Mervyn's In Chull VlslI Shoppln, Center had just open~ "JJ.-t'I J:> -5. UNOFFICIAL Mf' . ," -.'-.'----.--.-'""---.--.'..-..-.- --..--. MINUTES OF A WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION Thursday, May 26, 1994 Conference Room 1 · 6:30 p.m, Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll c.åll: Present: Chair Thomas, Vice Chair Padilla, Commissioners Bierd, Koester, Matacia, and Smith Unexcused Absence: Commissioner Pitts Also Present: Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer; Ftank Rivera, Associate Traffic Engineer · 2. Ora' Cðm~kation§ . None. 3. DicnJssion: PrOlK)§N ChanRK to ooliciM and Munida!1 Code Hal Rosenberg introduced the subject of the policy, and discussed the reasons why It should or should not be adopted. The following three items need to be revised: 1. The Ordinance which created the Safety Commission 2. The Ordinance which prescribed City Council authority. 3. Adoption of a policy. · Hal Rosenberg asked what the Safety Commission wanted because ltaff needed to present the policy to Council with Safety Commission's recommendation. Council tould delegate authority to the Slfety Commission, but the Municipal Code needed to be amended which prescribed the procedure and policy. Discussion on the proposed policy was held by all Commissioners and staff. Frank Rivera mentioned liability Issues and cost Issues. Vice Chair Padilla Council wanted some warrants to be more flexible and felt the Safety Commission should review warrants. The Commission should not be Involved In CIP projects and should focus on a narrow field . of ideas. . · Chair Thomas said the Commission wanted the politics of the dedllonl to be eliminated and the process streamlined. , Hat Rosenberg said there might be lituations where the Slfety Commission may n6t want to have final decision makinlauthority, and Instead forward a recommendation to the City Council. . After dilcusslon, the Safety Commission did not alree with the comment. Commissioners agreed with the establishment of Trial Traffic Relulatlons IOlely.. a body, without hiving to have it approved by the City Council. · Commissioner Matacia liked the appeal process and Slid Council should be able to vote on whether or not they wànted to hear an issue. Frank Rivera questioned whether the appeals process would he enoulh to reduce the number of Items that the City Counei I heard. .~ UNOFFICIAL MINUTES IJ¿) - Safety Commission Minutes \ay 26, 1994 ..ge 2 .to Hal Rosenberg said the Commission could consider having the requester attend City Council meetings and have 3 minutes to present their case. The appeal process needed to be similar to the C.U.P. process. The appeal process could be placed on the City Council consent calendar with a recommendation to consider the appeal. If an appeal was granted, then Item could be docketed at a future City Council meeting. The citizen would be given two weeks to return an ap¡>eal form. Citizens would be given an appeal form at a Safety Commission meeting and City Council would have to vote on whether or not to approve the appeal. Council wanted citizens to have a more streamlined process to resolve citizen requests. He asked the Commission to make comments on the working draft. Staff would send a copy to the Commission prior to management review. He suggested the Commission might want to set up a meeting with the City Engineer and Diredor of Public Works to discuss the ISsue. He wanted to revise the appeal process and send out revisions to the Safety Commission Commissioner Smith emphasized why the policy was a benefit. There would be less meetings for the citizen to attend and for City staff to prepare for. The benefits should be listed in the report to Council. Hal Rosenberg Indicated there were four items that needed to be accomplished: 1. A change In the BIClC handbook 2. A change to the ordinance 3. A change to the Municipal Code ... Adoption of the revised Safety Commission policy Ie continued by saying that staff had a responsibility to Inform the City Council, what the request was, ItS lfllpacts and staff's recommendation. Chair Thomas wanted the benefits of the policy listed. Commissioners felt staff would receive more support from the Safety Commission because decisions would be based on technical, not emotional reasons. 4. CMn",lulftftø' CnmlMMs· None. Vice Chair Padilla said he would be on vacation from June 13:17. 5. ADIOURNMŒNT at B:37 p.m. to the regularly scheduled Safety Commission meetlna of Thursday, Jur\e 9, 1994 at 7:00pm In the Council Chambers. Respectfully Submitted, frank Rivera, Associate Traffic Ena1neer . J~~8{A~ -/ by: Shirley lux , Recordina Secretary -.....-- J J~.3? ~ UNOFFICIAL MINUTE - ~ ---~ -----~-- ~fety Commission Minutes June 9, 1994 Page 7 - · 11. Establishinl! Trial Traffic Rel!Ulation . Distributed for Commissioner Information Fifth Avenue 30 mph from Naples Slree to Orange Avenue . Faivre Street 30 mph from cul-de-sac west of Jacqua Street to Broadway OTHER BUSINESS 12. 1IMntw@d Citvwid@ Proi@rt, Hal Rosenber¡ Indiated that the proposed ar wash on Bonita Road had appeared before the Planning Commission. The residents complained about traffic impacts and the Commission raised questions that could · not be answered at the hearing and voted to deny the project, The appliant requested an appeal of the action and met. again with the Planning Commission. The appliant hired a traffic consultant who reviewed the traffic study thaI had been completed for Ihe application and based on Ihe information and a change in the design of the ar wash, the Planning Commission was satisfied. There were also residents who were nol opposed tò the ar wash. Based on testimony by residents and slaff, the Planninl Commission unanimously approved the project. Chair Thomas asked staff to review the design and traffic pattems of the ar wash. Hal Rosenberg said the ar wash was totally controlled and was unlike the Shell Car Wash where vehicles drove in then drove out with their vehicles wet. The proposed ar wash would completely dry vehicles priot to leavinlthe site. There would also emp,loyees drying cars. He expressed a concern regarding proximity 0' · the ear wash exit to the intersection which could create a problem. Cars could slack up in area. The appliçanl agreed that If problems occurred, he had no objections to restrictinl movements out of the driveway. He reviewed the traffic patterns for the Commission. Chair TholNS asked if s..ff was satisfied with the design or if they had to make concessions. Hal Rosenberl said staff set requirements and they were met. They did not have to make concessions. . 13. Letter to Lt. Tom Schaeffer. Chula Vista Pollee DeoartmØII . Distributed for Commissioner 'nformation. 14. laføv Commiulðn .ud.~ . Frank Rivera reviewed the new budlet for the Commission. There was a reduction In postale and travel, conferences, and meetinp. 15. Ian Di@RQ Union Trlbun@ Artid@ on CammillionB' 1.1. Mat.d. datNl Sf1'''' . Distributed for Commissioner Information. 16. Saf@fy Commi"ion potin UDdat~ Frank Rivera had distributed a memo on the dias that went to Cliff Swanson, City Enllneer, after the Safet, Commiulon workshop rellrdinl the policy. Also attached to the memo was a workinl draft and s..ff was ) '3 /.s--~ ~ . .~.^eeII"IA' MINUTES Safety Commission Minutes June 9, 1994 Pase 8 work ins on the Safety Commissions' recommendation resardins appeals. It was his Intention that a more final policy would be ready at the next meetins. He hoped to have the City Attomey attend the next meetins. Hal Rosenberg asked the Commission to review the memo to be sure that stiff interpreted their direction correctly and were proceeding in the riSht manner. Chair Thomas announced that he and Vice Chair Padilla had a meeting with the Director of Public Works and City Ensineer to review the policy. He had also been assured by the City Attomey's Office that the item wou'd be given priority. 17. Saf@tv Cðm"d"lon DilnKllon Oft lrown Art Frank Rivera highlighted issues raised by the City Attomey at a meeting held regarding the Brown Act. · A 3t).day period retention of audiO tlpes must be maintlined and must be made available to the public for review. · Commissions cannot meet in closed session. . · Any special meetings must be called in order to POSI the an agenda Including a section for the public to speak. The meeting should be held In an open forum. · All documents made available to the Safety Commission must be made available to the public. · For Issues of less than a quorum, special committees may be held, but must meet all noticing rules and regulations. · Agendas needed to be brief, but adequate. The titles of repons must convey what the Issue was the Commissioner would be discussinl. · Agendas must be posted 72 hours In advance at a minimum. If an emergency Item needed to be dealt with, 4ISths of members (6 members of the Safety Commission) would need to approve hearlnl the Item. · A workshop was a meetlnl of more detlll on Issues. · Sisn-tn lists were not mandatory for the Commission to conduct business. · The Commission should not discuss with staff how other members of the Commission mlcht vote and should not discuss with stiff items away from the public meeting. All discussions must be done at the public meeting so that everyone could hear what was being discUSSld. If clarification was needed, the Commission t;Ould contlct staff. If staff felt all Commissioners needed clarification, an addendum would be distributed to all Commlisloners. · Commissioner Comments must be made (20 word description) available on the apnda and to the public. · At an ad-hoc (workshop) meeting, no action could be tlken, but the public must allowed to speak. ~ /J-~/ UNOFFICIAL MINUTES -_._--~.._----,._-_..,--_._-_._--- - .-.----- -------..--- H . . - Safety Commission Minutes luly 14, 1994 age 6 · 14. Møno from Chair Thoma§ røanfl.,. Attfftdant'e ProcøIurø Chair Thomas reminded everyone thaI attendance was vital to the Commission conduding business. If Commissioners were unable to attend a meeting, they were to call Shirley Buxton no laler lhan 4:00 pm the night of the meeting. If Commissioners did nOI phone In, they would be considered unexcused by the Commission. 15. -"I!d Citvwicfe Pro~ Hal Rosenberg Informed the Commission thaI the CityCoundl had approved the car wash on Bonita Road, easl of 1-805. · Chair Thomas asked for a stalus update on the Shell Oil Car Wash on Telegraph Canyon Road. Frank Rivera said lraffic engineering had made their requirements known 10 Planning and was unaware of lhe currenl status. Hal Rosenberg said the projed was moving forward. Chair Thomas asked if there was I dryerJblower required. hank Rivera said they required I dryer and drainage system II the car wash so waler would nOI be carried · onlO the streeL Hil Rosenberg stiff would give I copy of lhe site plln to the Commission II the next meellng. 16. Saføv CðIIøniulon PoII('\f I Wf..~ frank Rivera induded I copy of the minutes from I meeling between John Lippitt, Diredor of Public Works; Cliff Swanson, City Enlineer; Bob Thomas Ind himself. Many ideas had been presented II the meeling. He was Incorporating comments from the meelinllnlo the policy. The drift of the policy would probably be A'lllible at the next meetin,c. · 17. Pedøt,lan Safety In CallfDrnla, A State Plan. Distributed for Commissioner Information. 18. AM . Rnad 11_. 11....1. Ir Mariti...., SaHel Umllo . Distributed for Commissioner Information. 19. Commltllønø CðmIlL.~.lk Chair Thomas asked If staff was Preparinl the Safe Route to School Maps. Frank Rivera said staff was Preparinl the maps and they would be presented to the CommissIon. · Vice Chair Padilla apotOSized to staff for nol attendinl the meeting with Mr. lippitt and Mr. Swanson. He had In unexpected work related meetinl. );5 ~¿'?7 ~. UNOFFICIAL MINUTES Safety Commission Minutes August 11. 1994 Page 2 t Frank Rivera said Council had discussions on raised medians and whether they were needed at a particular IocatiOIL Baiøed medians was an item that the Orommi..non could look at when evaluating the projects. 6. REPORT saCety Commission Policy Granting Additional Authority Frank Rivera preeented .tafI's report and indicated Ita1f was not requesting action until the September meetinc- The policy was being sent to the City Attorney and City Manager'. OfIice for review. Hal Rosenberg said the policy was written from direc:tion Ita1freceived from the Commis.ion. He asked that the Commission review the item to conftrm that .iafrwas following their direction. The City Att.omey would be asked toro through the Municipal Code in order to make the changea that would give the Commission the authority to direct atafl'to inatall certain traflic regulations without having to go through the City Council. The appeal process was reviewed. A change to the previoua policy draft was that the SaCety Commiasion could not direct .tafI'to install a traflic control device without the approval and agreement of the C!ty Engineer. If the Commi.aion directed .tatrto inatall a traflic control device and the City Engineer did not approve. the item would go belore the City Council lor resolution. Oommillioner Smith uked what time frame the City Engineer had to put the item on the Council agenda for an appeal. I Hal Rosenberg stated the City Engineer wunot bound by a time limit. Chair Thomas said if'the Safety Commiasion had an item they wanted to lee completed quicldy, he did not want to Bee lIur montha go by belore action was taken. He BUggeated it .hould III on the &rat or sec:ond Council meetingaf'ter the Saf'ety Commiuion meeting. . Shirley Bunon indicated that the earlieat an item could III to Council would be 2 1/2 _b and that would be pruvided the report W8I written in three daya. UnaDy theJe W8I a little longer time period needed to eend the report to Council. Commi.Bioner Smith laid the Oommiuion W8I asking for the 6rIt or _nd available meeting to eend the item to Coancil. He did not want to be Itrung out for IÍS montha. ; Hal Ro.nber¡ laid the policy would be reviled to indicate that the item would be brouabt ilrwlrd at the 1m avaiJ.~ Council meeting. The burden would be onlta1f to write the "port, lilting the , Ot-IIIIHion'. ~"'endationa, and ilrwlrd it to the Ccnmcil. Chair Thomas aùecl fin a atanding item on the Oommiuion agenda which would update them on iCemI that had been dilCUllled and the current IItd' action. It would allow the Oommiuion to follow 1Ip on itema that !lad been dillCUlsed and Itt them know if'the item would be IDÏDC to Council or if' ad had decided to a¡ree with the Commilllion. Hal RoIenberg laid that the Commiuion would be kept in1brmed of each item that then had been dilapeement on. , . Oommiuioner Smith laid he allO woÙld like to lee a ltanding agenda item updadD¡ them 0Ji the ltatua ofvarioua pIOjec:tI. Chair·Thomas ac-d that a section or agenda item that was b follow-up Ihould be added to the apndL J3--¿'/ ~; UNOFFICIAL MINUTES .__.._'__m___.._____ ,--.---"---- -,--.-"---------.---.-- ... -."".--.-.....----,--..------..- · Safety Commiøion Minutes ' September I, 199. .... Commissioner Smith asked who reviewed medians. · Hal Rosenber¡ said planners wanted medians lor landscaping, but traffic engineering also reviewed them in areas where traffic needed to be channeled. He said staff would summarize all comments and present It to the Commission prior to It belnglorwarded to the City Council. 7. aŒPOIT Safety Commission Policy Granting Additional Authority FranIc Rivera said the draft policy the Commission received reflectfd changes made by the Public Wor\(s DepartmenL 1\ was staff's hope that the revised document would be reviewed by the Attomey's Office by the end of the month. If so, the Safety Commission would be asked lor IPProval at Its October meeting. He ftIIiewed the changes made in the policy. . · Hal Rosenber¡ said the format was changed lor clarity. Speed regulations were added to the policy that the Safety Commission could approve. Chair Thomas complimented staff on the wor\( completed. He said the item appeared to ID to the City Attomey's Office on September 2,1994 and wanted confirmation. Hal Rosenberg said the City Engineer had approved II, but was stili being reviewed by the Director of Public WorIcs. ~lœChair Padilla verified that any changes made by the City Attorney would be reviewed by the Commission. Hal Rosenberg said staff would mum to the Commission with a final document for their I )proval prior to · liking the item to the City Council. Chair Thomas asked if it was IUlistic that the City Attorney would review the Item within three weeks. Hal Rosenber¡ said that there was mo!, than Just the policy that needed to be reviewed. The changes to the Municipal Code would take a lot of time, but he hoped to convince the City Attorney to IP )rove the policy . IrId make the changes to the Code later. Traffic staff had already made the changes to the Municipal Code for the AttoIney. He hoped the Attorney would not make many changes. . . VIce Chair Padilla asked if the policies Could be broadened to Include lIOrI4II¡lneerlng factors. He had spoken before about solutions and the direction from CouncIl was to wor\( on policies IIId use a human perspective along side III engineering penpective. He hoped to .. that figured In. If the policy was liken literlilly, the · Commission was not free to have a basis for disagreement that was outside of traffic IIIglneerlng policies. It would limit the Commission to strictly staff's pnICIdures u to whether 01' not . particular Item met nqulren..... Hal Rosenber¡ said staff had III abllptlon to pIOvIde a technical recommendation. If staff started Interpreting the desires of the public, It would not be effective or unilorm. The Commission wu established to pIOvIde ,the Judgement and Nllng In some situations that needed other Judgement than traffic en¡lneerln,. He NCOIIImended staff not chanp the policies In order to second guess wbat the Commission felt staff should be doln.. nee ChaIr Padilla Indicated that he did not want to .. the policies staff used to IYllluate Items politicized. When the Item was discussed with Council, the feedbacIc wu that Council heard frustration from the · Commission because they could only act on traffic IIIglneerlnglOlutions. Since the rICOmmendatlons to the Commission were In traffic en¡lneeringlanJUIIge, it wu difficult for the Commission, without any other basis In Its procedures or policies from Council, to make a rICOmmendatlon to CouncIl that wu not In traffic / ;J-~.:2 ~ UNOFFICIAL MINUTES - Safety Commission Minutes September I, 1994 'Ale 5 I engineering language. Either staff's recommendation was supponed or It was not. What he heard from the Council was for the Commission to find a way to blend the traffic engineerlnl approAch with citizen Ideas and prOblems. However, the policy developed by staff was solid and would mutt the requests from the Safety Commission to the Council unless there was disagreement. He reiterated that he did not want to politicize the decision maklnl process, but have a better blend of the two processes. . Commissioner Miller suggested uslnl the phrase "tIklnl Into consideration" tnstead of "based on" "...established Council policies.." mllht live leewl)' to some decisions. ~I Rosenberg said he did not see any difference In the wordinl. :rile wordinl was Usted because the Munltipil Code for establishlnl various traffic control devices had to be based on criteria. Diwetionary judgement should be used alonl side the luldelines. If the Commission as a body felt there were thanles to be made, he asked that they live that direction as a body and not as Individuals. Commissioner Smith said he understood thai Council wanted a more humlllslde and felfthe Commissioners should recommit themselves to make the comments for the record. Chair Thomas said the Commission was to respond to the general plan of the Oty and the needs of citizens - and call upon staff for the technical asped. . 8. RŒPORT AffirminlTrlal Traffic Relulation '138 -Increased Speed Limits In Certain Zones - 600 8~otk of Naples Street Frank Rivera presented staff's IIPDn. Commissioner Liken asked If the elementary ~I had any comments on the Incrused speed limit. Frank River. said the school principiI had been noIIfled eight months ago before the trial traffic relulation was . Installed and he was not heard from. Commissioner Miller had received a call from the principal of Harborslde a few months batk and he wai concemed about the speed on Naples Street. The principal had Indicated that speed was a problem and he wanted to address the Commission about Installinl speed'humps In the area. She said when the orIlinal request was submlued, Broadw.y wasbelnl rHurfaced and that caused many problems. She asked staff If they had Informed the principal that the Item was scheduled for the Safety Commission meetlnl· Frank IUYIfI said he believed that the principal had been Informed but he CDUId 110I be ...... Commissioner Miller said motorists well suppasÏdID dIaI.e tpIId when dIIlchn WIll prøenl, but the principal said that was 110I happenln.. MSUC CSmIth/PittI}to ""-_....thaI C,"-dI,.. an ~"oIIßCI.", 1M.... traffic f'IIIIIatIon'" . ... the ..... .... _ --no ,. RŒPORT on request for lime Hmlted parklnl SOD bloclc of Del Mar A\III'IUlIrICI200 bloclcs of Shasta SIIIet and Whitney A\IIIIut I Frank IUYera presented staff'sreport. Chair Thorn. asked staff If they wrlfled that Sharp ... Ste.1y (SItS) had met conditIonS of their Conditional ;:t":,;y."" ~ UNOFFICIAL MINUTES -.__._..~------------ · Safety Commission Minutes October 13, 1994 I Page ~ - . Hal Rosenberg said every Intersection was evaluated for an all-way stop. The Intersections did not approach meeting the warrants. He indicated that on Oleander Awnue, motorists perceiwd a false sense of safe speed. Motorists tended to drive what they considered safe for roadway conditions. Oleander Awnue was a comfort. · able street to driw. With the edgelines, the impression could be siwn to the motorists that the road was narrower than it was, With regard to speed humps, the City of San Dieso Installed them on various streets with mixed resu'ts. Some motorists challenged speed humps to see how fast they could So over them. Another consideration was the bus route on Oleander Awnue between Sequoia Street and Oranse Avenue and staff did not want to subject transit passensers and the buses to the jolt of soinS over speed humps. He asked the Commission to let staff install the edgeline and proceed one step at a time. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: (Smhh) to havutaft also IoCJI¡ at delineators 01' CIIher deterrents for uslns Oleander Avenue as a through street. Motioned Seconded. VOTE OF MOTION AS AMENDED: Approved 5+2 with Vice Chair Padilla and Commilsloner Pitts absent. · 8. REPORT Safety Commission Policy Crantlns Additional Authority . Hal Rosenbers reported that the City Attorney had reviewed the policy and expressed concern with some of the wording in the policy and offered chanses. He read the dtaft chanses made by the City Attorney. If staff presented an Item to the Safety Commission for review and the Commission .reed with staff, staff would , proceed with the Installation. If the Commission overruled staff, it would be up to the City Council on whether to use the Safety Commission's recommendation. Another chanse was in the appeal process. !nsteall of havinS Council vote to hear an appeal, the Attorney felt that if there was a unanimous vote to uphold staft's recommendation rejectins a citizen request, then the decision would be final and there would not be an appeal. However, if there were one or two commissioners that voted for a citizen request apinst staff's recommendation, then the appeal process would besin. He asked the CommIssion for input as to how many · descendins votes were needed before an Item went to Council. Chair Thomas said he would prefer that two Commissioners disasree with In Item before it would So to Council, rather than just one commissioner. Hal Rosenberg said staff would redraft the policy with the Attorney's chanSes and present it at the next Safety Commission meetins. If the Commission approved the policy, the intent was to take It to the City Council. At that point, the City Attorney would need to modify the Municipal Code to indicate changes. '.' Commissioner Liken asked if Council had been asked Ibout the chances In the lIppeal process. It was his understanding that Council did not want to be burdened with lIppeals. HlI Røsenbera said he felt that staff was meetins Council's objective by NdudnS the number of appeals related to traffic matters. If the Commission felt that a majority was III that was necessary to approve an Item _d no appeal would be allowed, he would ask the Attorney If that WIS iep!. Chair Thomas .reed that there needed to be III option ~r citizens to appeal, but it should not be IS easy IS , In the past. Commissioner Smlth.reed that two Commissioners diSllrHlnS on III item should be enoush to send III item I to Council. Discussion occurred on the number of members needed to approve III Item and If the fiSure chansed based . on how mlny commissioners were It I meeting. 'JJ-¿f~ UNOFFICIAL MINUTES Safety Commission Minutes October 13, 1994 Page 6 Frank Rivera said if Council had two members absent it took all three other Council members to approve an Item. Chair Thomas commented that on the Malta issue, that three members of the four members present voted yes . and asked if that was sufficient to approve the item. Hal Rosenber¡ said that he was unsure about the Commission's lCtion and would need clarification. However, since the action of the Commission was to meet with residents and that had already been ' announced 10 the residents present, staff would proceed with the CommIssion's recommendation. Chair Thomas was pleased that the policy _med to be lettinl closer to a final policy. " 9. REPORT on Shell Gas Station Improvements on Telelraph Canyon Road" Halecrest Drive Obis Item heard before hem II Chair Thomas announced that he had been advised by the City Attomey to abstain from the item. He appointed Commissioner Smith to chair the item and left the dais. Steve Griffin, Principal Planner, presented staff's report. Commissioner Smith stated the entry way was a concem due 10 stacklnl of cars and felt the entire west driveway should be designatedlpainted with 'No Parlcinl.· Another concem was water draln..e on the surroundinl streets creatlnl breakdown of the streets. He sUllested a secondary drainap system at the exit of the car wash as well as boIlS dots that would assist 10 shake off any additional water. , Steve Griffin responded that additional drainale was possible. He undemood the City's concem rqardinl . water dralnale especially since the situation with the .80nlta Glen CAr Wash. There were drains It the exit of the car wash. There was a condition that required the applicant 10 sian an llreement llreelnllo repair Illy damales caused by water to the streets It their cost. He understood that the drylnl process for the car _h was more effective than the one on 80nltJ Glen DrIve. . en, Cox, !tH ,onItit 'oa( Su1tl2OO, 1onIt., CA "JO~ le )resented the owners of the TeleJl'aph Canyon Shell Gas Station. He Introduced the station owner, a consultant, IIId . sales representJtlve of the car wash """ufacturer. There would be in additional 40 trips per day pnerated by the car wash. Most of the people uslnl the car wash would be those motorists .Iready stopplnl.t the station for ps. The level of service for the surroundinl streets would not be neptlvely impacted. He outlined the differences of the proposed car wash IIId the one on 80nlta Glen DrIve incluellnl the drylnl mechanism IIId speed of the car wash. The system would be operated by token or receipt. If a motorist receiWd . token or receipt IIId chose not 10 have their car washed .t that time, there would be ì specified period of time when the motorist could retum IIId receive their car wash. There were community benefits that would occur with the project. The applicant was belnlleClu1red 10 dedicate III additional seven feet of frontJp 10 ~ City for future road widenlnl of Telelraph Canyon Road. When the orilinal dralnap culvert was installed, there was not III easement secured from the property owner, but lIIother condition of the development was that the City would receive the easement. The applicant tried to secure . no-cost easement from the Vons ShoppInl Center owner 10 have . traffic exit the car wash throulh the shoppinl center, but had not been successful. .04 .Ishar.t. sor T.". Can)'OØ'oa( a.u¡. VIst., CA ""0, was the owner of the Telelraph Canyon Shell stJtion. He commented that if the Commission was concemed with possible stJckini, the speed of the car wash could easily be Increased in order to accomm~te more cars. He doubted there would be a stlcklnl problem because he only llltlcipated approximately 10 cars per day Oller. 12 hour period, dusk 10 dawn. Studies showed that most elr washes were clone In the middle of the day, not on the way 10 or from )/~~5 ~ UNOFFICIAL MINUTES · - Safety Commission Minutes November 10,1994 Page 5 Mr. Silva said the Distrid was putting together a proposal for funding for school upgrades and he would speak - to his supeJVi50r about adding the signal Installation to the list of items needing funding. Commissioner Smith asked Mr. Silva If the Distrid had a program for carpooling. · Mr. Silva said the Dis.rid encouraged carpooling but did not have a formal plan. 7. 'REPORT Safety Commission Policy Oranting Additional Authority Frank Rivera .,d Hal Rosenberg reviewed the changes made by the City Attomey and City Engineer. Discussion occurred on various aspects of the policy. Chair Thomas was under the impression that the policy would streamline the amount of Items that needed to · 80 before the City Council for final decision and resolution. Hal Rosenberg Indicated that it was one part of streamlining the process. Chair Thomas asked about the appeal process. Hal Rosenberg said if the commission unanimously approved staff's recommendation in denial of a dtizen request, the matter was final and was not appealable to Council. If a member of the CommIssion voted ¡pinst staff's recommendation and supported the citizen request, the Item was appealable to Council. Commissioner Smith and Chair Thomas said they thought that previously the policy stated that two members of lhe Commission needed to vote ¡pinst an Item before It could be appealed. frank Rivera said any vote required four commissioners in order to carry. In the instance of five commissioners present, the commissioners feh that one descending vote would be enough to máke the item appealable. If the Item were not appealable the dtizen could feel penalized since some commission members were absent. The number of votes needed for appeal was discussed in various scenarios. . Vice Chair Padilla said despite the policy, there would be Items that went to Coundl anyway because he felt no policy could prohibit a dtlzen from ~Ingln Item to the City Coundl. However, the Commission needed to do their best effort to trim the Items 80lnl to Çoundl. Commissioner liken asked to have the appell process clarified by the aty Attomey as 10 number of votes needed for., Item 10 be appealed. 8- Oral Conununlratlnnl_ None STAFF RfPORTS 9. EnllinHrlnR elP ProIHt kMdule - Distributed for Commissioner Information. J3--t¡' ~ "UNOFFICIAL MINUTES COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item pI Meeting Date 3/14195 ITEM TITLE: Report: Relocation of Restroom Facility in Memorial Park SUBMTITED BY: Director of Parks and Recrea~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager.,) ~ ~ (4/5tbs Vote: Yes _ No X) /Z' On September 20, 1994, the City Council was presented with a petition signed by 108 residents of One Park Apartments. The residents were objecting to the construction of new restrooms in Memorial Park being built near their complex. The Department was directed to evaluate other sites within the park and have the Police Department review the proposed location for safety issues. The intent of this report is to present the site review recommendation of the Architect/Consultant; the Police Department's analysis of four potential sites; and discuss staff's rationale in recommending an alternative site for the Memorial Park restroom. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council accept the report and approve the construction of new restrooms at the existing location off of Park Way; and authorize staff to solicit a consultant to prepare necessary construction documents. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: On January 19, 1995, the Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously voted to approve the construction of the new restroom off of Park Way and Third Avenue. DISCUSSION: The Master Plan for Memorial Park, approved by the City Council in 1988, recommended a new restroom building and play area be located in the northeastern sector of the park (Attachment "A"). This site was chosen because it provided the best service for the Memorial Bowl and the new play area, which also would be located in that area. The building has been designed to be aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the other Memorial Park architecture. Phased construction documents were prepared for the renovation of Memorial Park in FY 89/90. Phase I was constructed in 1991, and Phase II (Parkway Center remodeling) was completed in 1993. Funding became available for the implementation of Phase III in FY 93/94, which includes the new restroom facility, demolition of the existing restroom, and associated sidewalk improvements. At the City Council meeting on September 20, 1994, a petition (Attachment "B") signed by 108 residents of One Park Apartments (adjacent to the northeast side of Memorial Park) was presented, objecting to the restroom beirig located in the northeast sector of the park; citing their concerns about crime, and visual impacts. The Department was directed to evaluate other potential sites and get input on safety issues from the Police Department and the Parks and Recreation Commission. [JF:tt-Al13-Memprl;rr.rpt-March 7, 1995] 1 I¥-I -_._- ..--------..--.----....--... ,_.._--_._--_._--------_.._-~--~-- ------_.....-- Item /0/ - Meeting Date 3/14195 Six potential sites were evaluated by a consultant, including the recommended Master Plan site. Two sites were rejected because of flooding concerns and the need for extensive retaining walls. The remaining four potential sites (depicted in Attachment "C") are: 1. Alternative A - Master Plan site 2. Alternative B - Corner of Madrona and Third Avenue 3. Alternative C - Parkway and Third Avenue 4. Alternative D - West of Memorial Bowl The four sites were rated based on the following criteria: · safety and ease of after-hours surveillance · accessibility to most highly used park facilities · visual and other impacts on adjacent uses · comparative cost of improvements A comparison of the four sites (made by the Architect/Consultant) relative to the above criteria is as follows: Alt<:rtuìIJWoB Altí:iilåIMD (COO1"'ofMad«>Oio <W"",9f &T!1inI^"",,""> ~~ User Safety I Ease of SUlveillance Good Good Good Good Accessibility to Highly-Used Good Fair Poor Poor Facilities Visual Impacts into Park Site Minimal High Minimal Minimal Impacts 10 Adjacent Residential Low None Low Low Uses Impacts to Adjacent Commercial Low High High None Uses Attached is a summary of each site evaluated (Attachment "D"). CONSULTANTS CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the consultant, Alternative A (Master Plan site {near One Park Apartments}) remained the preferred site. They felt the only significant impact (being able to see the restroom building from One Park Apartments), could be inexpensively mitigated by tree planting. However, the Police Department has concerns about using additional trees to screen the building. POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Police Department reviewed the four alternative sites. From their perspective, Alternative B (corner of Madrona and Third Avenue) was preferred. They felt Alternative A (Master Plan site) [JF:tt-A113-Memprtrr.rpt-Marçb 7, 1995] 2 11'..2 . ..",,"" ........ '-.111."1111-.' 11 111 (HlI~IITlIr-"nl'l,; rnro. nrll1P'C".T TlInnlncr Wll1 ~l1Ttlr_p: "'nnf1ç, ::trp ~v:;nl~hlp_ 1n MpmnrÙ;¡) Item 1'/ ~ Meeting Date 3/14/95 provided the least favorable surveillance for patrolling officers. Alternative C (Parkway and Third Avenue) is acceptable if the building is not located further northwest in the park. They felt the existing restroom has good surveillance for patrol cars. The Police Department's review is Attachment "C". STAFFS RECOMMENDATION: The Department has taken into consideration the consultant's report, the Police Department's recommendation, and the petition of the One Park Apartment residents, and recommends that the new restroom be constructed at the existing restroom location at Park Way and Third Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The existing restroom site has served park users adequately for over twenty years. 2. The Police Department believes the existing restroom site provides good surveillance with minimal safety problems. 3. By siting the new restroom on the existing restroom location mitigates the concerns expressed by the One Park Apartment residents. 4. The existing restroom site has a minimal impact to any residential area. The Department is opposed to Alternate "D", west of Memorial Bowl because the restroom would be too obstructive, distract from the athletic setting, and it is a distance from the picnic users. COST IMPACf: Demolishing the existing restroom and building a new restroom at this site will require a new soil test, grading and landscape plans, and new construction documents. The current consultant requested an additional $13,000 to prepare the necessary plans for relocating the restroom. The Department will obtain a cost estimate from another consultant to determine whether or not the request by the current consultant is reasonable. If the Department recommends another consultant, there will be a delay in commencing the project until after the summer concert series, which ends in August. FISCAL IMP ACf: Funds appropriated for this project are approximately $140,000. Staff anticipates that even if additional design costs of $10,000 - $13,000 are required for soil testing, revising site plans, and construction documents, the project funding will suffice. Funds are available in Memorial Park Phase II - PR 168. However, if the construction bid comes in higher than expected, staff will return to Council with a request for an additional appropriation. Attachments: A - Master Plan B - Petition in Opposition to the Relocation C - Restroom Site Alternatives D - Site Evaluation Summary E - Memorandum from the Police Department {JF:tt-Al13-MemprbT.rpt-March 1, 19951 3 JJ/- 3 ---_._~----_.-._- ..-----"--- . Ë ~. ' z::IOI: ¡.¡ ""0 J: ;:,¡ Q 25 ::¡ =: Q.) ~ cJ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ""0 = 2 < Q 5 ~ c B~z~O'~ '" ~ ... ~:; ~ ~:.; Q. ... ~ ' " . '.' "]' . I ~ " :: ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ È ,9;; ,§ ~ ~ ¡ ~ ã ~ ~ ª ~ 6 CIS ~ ~ ~ l2 g ~ ~~ ~~~~ ;-65 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z <= ~ ~ ~ 0 = ~ V !-~ ~i!: ¡j ~ ~ ¡.¡ ! :; 0 <= b'o ~ 0 ::¡ t~ ~~ § ¡:: ~ ':;@ ¡s 6 ~ ;:j '" Õ ~ ..8 ~:'i ~¡:: ~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ..ê .~ CIS . r -, opo' ..., 0 . 0 . o· " , ~~ j~! ; ~ ~ '" ~ : ~ ~ "'.ê ~ 0 ::i!- ..,~ ~~ :> ;¡ 2 ¡::: '" 9 ~ 0:'3 ~ ~ (J (J p~ ~¡¡ ~g ~ ~ iJ ~ ~ ~ j = :.a t ~ .8 ...u ~'" :;;a:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Æ ~ ~ t' ~ ~ _ '" . c-." v CIS ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ." ~ ~ ~ CIS > V ....... 0 1-0 '" ~ ""C "j be ... >. ... Q. .... = ¡2 ~ <= ~oo ~::I .- '" ~~ f5~~ .-Ë'~S u E .... ... ;¡¡~ ::::.:;'"' uSe ~ 0 9 ; ~ ~ ¡: ~ ~ lj o·g Eo-- ~ ~..~ ~~ ~~~ :;..g~:! a _ .ð' ~z ~uU o_g C <= _ <.:> 0:: 0 '-' '" ::I C ,) <I) !~;;>: !-~ ¡:~~ ¡o~ S :..ë '" "i 9 ,=ª..: z 1:: '"' 0 ~'- ~ ... ~12;:; ~E ~ô~ ~.5~ g 'õ ~ ,n "p'. ,<,0' " '. 'OU Z U ' ~ 0 ;; c ~ c I ~ ~, ,,3~" § ~ ~~ -" · c :;; ~ ~ , 0 . u "" z u 0 uz . . '. . '~ ¡¿ :,; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ t ~.~ ¡t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .:: :.;¡ .': be v '-' '" _ ... iJ '::è'" '" E- "io >. ~ ~ c ...c ~ a ~ ~ p ~~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ] 'a~ ~ ; C 0 - C .. 0 ". < ...~ C'I .~ N C ..Q ~ _ N . .. =- "- z:> tí Q..;': E ¡,.; ""C I ..0'. .-.' ..- 000 ..., . '" ~ 0::1 -... >.. ~ '": ~ Q.::;.2., ~ ~;::.¡: .5 ~ ¡¡ .... ð v~f ;::"5 v a : ~2~ .~-~ ~ ~ U U U ¡.. co·'" ~ .9 ..........,..- ~ ð <" U " ~. U·o 0 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~.sê "i 9 : ~ ~ ~ ~È~ -:Ë';: . "5~!;;~ § ..""~ ~"":¡ = ~ § ~ " ~ : ~ ~ !;; < ~ ~ -" '; c ..:: I <. 5'O"0<z." _0.... .."0,, "" ",,:=õ"'~< g: o=~~.s~J; ::it ... ~ "" 0 '" Z :..: r..:o '" 11.> Q., ., .- 8 ~ ~ :5 ~ < ~... ~ ~ !: ~~;t 11.> .2] ;. ~ = "" 5 ?' ~ :;! ~:s r- c !:;: .- ;:: ~ ~ ., .- ce o ... 0 <"" = 0= :!J ... <a U v ..... t: C'I:I-O ;; . . . , ' . .0 ., . . . . . 0 . . ü = ~ u ~ ~ 8::it ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" = ~ .: .~ ~ ~ ~ ¡:; '" u =; ~ ~ ~ .: ~ ; 0 Q., ~ ò = " ~ ~ ~ ~ .0 ~ , . 0 -" c E C 0 S u ::it ~ '" z z ~¡¡;¡ >< ~ ~ v ...::.: ~ 0 v "tñ v o' ~=2: ;:: .,-;t~v::::; .... Ñ ¡:: ¡:j ... .,; >6 . 0 C'I:I ~ V ., .... .... N ¡;,-¡ ~ gj .~ :- c: ~ ~ .s c; ...::.: .c ">.. - .c: ...::.: -5 ~ ~ .,......sß-c~v ~ ~ ~ ce~Q., .,.sQ.,Q., ~-= ~ ~ C'I:I-o-oQ.,vo t:2 u r..:o -;~c:c .,...c~ ...i= ':;! ~ ï:: C'I:IC'I:I£- ., I ? 0 .' o°."ø..o , "" ¡,: ~ ~ ;! <' S -5 0 ,£ ° 0 0 ~ " ;! ô < ;! ~ ¡g ~ 0 . ';; ,," s ';;; ,. 3 ¿s~~z~~~:š :;~.s'E<f.: -= ...=><:<>-1=:": ::OVC'l:l-o "'" " ~ ¡: ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ .- ~ ~... ~ ¡ z f 5 ~ ~ > ~ Z~ Ü z => = ... ~ ~ 0 ::it ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t f~ g >- ::i = -= z - z 0 0< 0 ~'i 0 -= = <a !;; 0 z ~¡;¡; z ~ ~o £ ~ ~ ~ 0 . ð ~~ ~ I z~ !;; . ~ 0 ~ ~ u ~, 0= :s::i ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:..: ~~ =< = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" Q= "'= ~~ ¡;¡; 5 ~ Ô 0 :..: ~ ~~ ~< =~ ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~ 3 ~... :!J~ r · ...::" .n' _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ 0; ) ~ " u ~ ':;! 5 ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ :Þ ~ :..: ¡:~ooJ.< -I ::. r..:o ... I z = Q === ;; ~ ~ ,~<z ~ < :;:< . ~ <00" - < <: ~ ~ ;.u z = n z ....J = ::: -=~?ë r..:o a :r: ::. Q.¡ < Q 101 ¡¡¡ Z 5 < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;! ~ 5 i*i ~ ~ Q. < ~~ ¿, ~ ¡¡;¡!:! r..:o ::¡¡ :z _ < r..:o ~ 00 Z "" ~~ ~ !:;: --I E-t S ~ <::;~ ¡¡;¡ ~ !;;i: ~ ~ ~ Q. :!J'" ~ ~~ ~ ~ =4 ~~ ~ r -, ~ , '¡' " " I, " , ~ 101 ~r..:o ~ 101101 ~ 0 u= "">- Z o :5 IoIZ ì=' 0:] < 2: ~r..:o o¡.. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ¡5 ~~ ~ _ u 8~ ~ ~~ !:;: ~ "~ =0 ~ _. Z 101 ~¡.. ~f !;; ~ N ~ ~ .,; >6' . '0. ,Jr --.---- / ~ -..> ---~~ ._-~ ATTACHMENT "B" PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO THE RELOCATION OF RESTROOMS IN MEMORIAL ( PARK! PAGE 1. STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION, SIGNATURES NO. 1-11 PAGE: 2. SIGNATURES NO, 12-37 PAGE 3. SIGNATURES NO. 38-63 PAGE 4. SIGNATURES NO. 64-89 PAGE 5. SIGNATURES NO. 90-108 PAGE 6. PHOTO AND DRAFT OF PROJECT AREA PAGE 7. PLk~NING DEPARTMENTS MAIL OUT PAGE 8. PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEW I , I J 1--/_ ¿ n _____ __..__ .. - --- --~--~---------- _ __ ___ ____ __u__ ---- -------..---- _.--- .. .~_.__.- --~---- '. B-2 PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO THE RELOCATION OF RESTROOHS IN HEHOR I AL PARK! We the residents of One Park are in opposition to the proposed site for the relocation of the restrooms in Hemorial Park. The location as shown in the Design Review Application is almost in our front door. We feel this is an unnecessary expense to the tax payers and could be done for far less expense and serve the same purpose by remodeling in its present location, where it doesn't detract from any property. We the residents of One Park will experience more traffic, both auto and foot, not to mention the increased noise of all hours of the day and night. We are a family dwelling and feel the traffic that is attracted to the public restroom could represent a danger to the children of our residents as well as all other children by placing the restroom in this location, the most highly used area of the park. The relocation will also cut down on the more desirable amount of space available to families who picnic and enjoy the Park. The proposed walk way designed in the area of the present restroom is not necessary and reduces the beautiful green lawn area, only to increase the amount of cement. We highly recommend that the remodeling be done in its present location. ADDRESS 1. ~~r~ I ' 'r' " 2. l~ 3. - 4. ____..1I.___~__..~_.._....:..a.__ 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 'Iù 1O.~~.~ 11. ð XUuu"'n..':.( , " . J . /0/-7 ~-~--,------ .. ---------.---.-------- -------...-.---- -~--'--'---'----'----'--~"----' B-3 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. ( 1 - 18. 19. 20. 2l. 22. 23. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 3l. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 10/- Y - 8-4 38. 39. 42. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 5l. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. . 60. 6l. 62. 63. ~ 1'/·' - NAME ADDRESS B-5 644L/L~ :~j- ~¿ /.. &t" /\l 67. 68. 69. I 70. 7l. 72. 73. 74. 75. c - 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 8l. 82. 83. 84- 85. 86. 87. 88 _ 89. J'I~ /() - . . . ) . " _ ~,.~ ' ,,, ';' . / . I' ",h - - II! ~ ~f'" '~ ¡l~~..iM - ~ ~U. ~ wID Z.. _ .. ..f _ '..' · ~ 'n _~......_~~¡¡:¡;';"'_"""""-"_- :--o....."".__~_ ...~-''''''''''''''- · a.:: ~ ..·t,~,. :".' .. ~ ~.;' . , I I ,........ '. I Sl..~~~:' ", ~ ~_.> .;t' ,~;;9> · ._~ ~~~ _.. _;8>-"'- '>'~~! ".~/:." ~ ' , ð"'- +.;~; ,,;,~~;>\~\~, I~ it ..... ". ". ·'Fe· '¡;j;.:" , · ~;~i ",- ~~.~,~, :~, ,,:";:.;. '-:~:,-~!::,:~'''', r~'; ~ ',:.'::~'-;;~ ¡,~."~. ". ' ' ~,>,~..~ , . " " ':_\'}:~r"; ~~-~ , ,,<;' :-~~~~,?:,7~:,· I Lï ,, ,~ ..1 IJ ."'.. . '-' '-".' ,,', .~" : .~? ~W.f,.~~~¿ I; ____~_____ _.._~ I' I a.ltiJ. ATTACHMENT "C" I ,nNI^Y ë 'i 1$ 0 ~ '" E .... ð _ I !: 0 E .2 o 5 ~ 0 ... E .::: E ~ 8. ......,8 ~ < ~ ·ê~,go:::e ~ .... .... (1:1 ....... ... $ '¡;'; g. >. (1:1 E ~ e ~.!! ~8 c . g £~.~t;.~ ~ c '¡;'; ·c ~ ~ ~ ~i B~ BÞI) '; (1:1"0 (1:1 C E C'" E~ E.... ~~ ~'5 B.~ Æ ~ (1:1 ~.... ::(::¡ < 0.. e 0 @@@@ n ~ I ::.:: ~ " ~ "" t; g ~ t3~ ~ ~~!~ ~~~t3n~~ « z ~ §~8~~i~~~i~ln~ ~ "" m ~ > ~§~ u ~ ª Ë~~ h!n~¡IUn~;~~¡ ~ . ..J ~ ~ i< 69! . . . .~~~¿~~~~~~~~~ ::::~~~.................. '" co: ...; :z; ~, 0 X " -' '" ::E po: " ¡¡¡ ::E ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ I¡'¡!II!! ¡!1·1¡¡! ~ ~~~"6 <~~~<~ .. _ ( li!!!¡¡!!!il¡li¡!! ! ß.. :i¡¡¡~~~"i>¡'i> ~~ ¡¡~ ~ ~~~~~ !h:~~!B! ~ . . ~ . . . . . '~g"'N ~~~~~¿~~~~~~~~ ........ --___N ¡¡¡~ I ¡ ¡Iii ¡ ¡ I III!II 1¡IIIIII,j !!¡!!!!!~~~~!!!!; )11- ü - - - .. ----- - - .-.-.,. ; --_.~ - -- ....~-_._-~_.".. - --.- o Õ -; ~g¡¡¡ .§ : c: « § æ .. ¡; .~ H ~ ~ ATTACHMENT "0" I 0 :;::: - i! S,· ~='" i! .- Q) - c... . _ i! ~ . . ~ +-' ~u c.. "':!. ._ ... ';/t.C:t .... U ..... - or;; ;a E b.g!ll rtS ctS 0 CD .!!II ª Õ.::t :2 ,t),'I::'> (I) i 00 c: ...J '§ ~ ~ m ~ .~ ~ ~ d~ . ~¡: ~ .... W III œ ftI ~ 0;1) 0 ¥-a. J IÐ~ :.: .....J Q) ¡¡¡::¡: ~].~ ~ . i 1! d.~ ~ &¡:¡ '" E ~ en ..... S:: -& m '=.!ì. 8 11I20 ~ ~.~ < 0 « ~ ~ ~ ~g ~ ,; ¡; i ~ ~~£~ ª n 0.. 0 c... ~!..& ~ i. .. ~.p ~ ¡ii ~ ~ .. ! ~ ;; ! . ¡rJ!_C S -~ û) ¡ ~:Q I : t ~ t ~ ~~~i § i~ Q) )o,g! g Ii 11I.2 - 1Ð,!!i·-1tI iii < ill> co ;; ~ 01: .Ii .. >- I?e.ð & !s .. - C .. ~ "". -f -' a: H ~ !!' ~;¡. & ~ .. ££B i ..~ I < 0; î l;;; ~ j¡ ¡ d J :! e. ~ic;~!o ii H - I» '!' "'B ! !l . 15 >. Ie a.f4 - OC.5..c:;.M =B _ ~ ~ ~ III ¡III S s a .~I ~ ~E i;~!~ ¡ ; i ~ I ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ij ~ ~i ~~=~) ~ il~ UJ ~.. . . Q. . ::E 1 < (J ~ l.....¡ ~ I lì U\ I p ~ I " C> ~ = :I: a u I "'" UJ ~....I I.ù D.£ <! ~ W Ç? < I '" I!! ~ => "I!! I ~~ ~ ì ~~ \:J I ðš ~ . \O!3 ~ êu < ~< '" I UQ U Q' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ W ~....I 1 \:J z ;2 " :: \:J z UJ 1= \:J U\ :¡ ¡;j ~ ~ z ;2 ~ I s ":', ~ S 'Y \ < '\ ~ \\\~ \.. ~ - UJ ~ \ \ ~ II) ~" '" ~ ~ ~~ z I!! UJ " ¡ ~§ ::; ~ \ I ¡¡j / "\ "\~ I 5 ¡:¡5 ~ C> I Ie! 1 <'" ~:rt V ¡ u..~ C 0 ~ ..." " .. \ I a 0< Q.. 0 r: tL~ R: ~5 I PI· I:; . I ,,;~ o eo c "" 0 2 00 2 11,_ _ i~ 0 _. -- '., '. I! e ~ 28 c ~ ''S . ao. '. " ,. "III ~". I. i;¡ ! j ¡ ,I.. I 0" · 0 '.. '0"" '! '.., ' I 1;; 1ií Jj ~ ; ¡ i ¡ ¡~ I I,. ! It! I I g E Cõ (t ~.~ t Af ~ëi I U i i t~i ....J Q) OJ .C: '. I!. ¡¡ - II?"~ 0 tI .. 0_ ' - z 0 '. . ". . ',0. ~ IE "" E " i II.Þ: ,¡ ¡ . ¡ .,¡ ;::, g ~ ~ ¡ ~ "! ~~ ..1 ~~i ~ B h f 1 i ..Iii I ~ ¡;- ~ ~ ; '" g I "~I c'" 0 ëi g e 811 - '" . .. " "' "' " ". '" , i,..., ,."." ! . "" +;- a:" ; ; r ¡ ! ; It H d I¡ I !f~ i ~! I i~u. .. 2 "i!. Ii . c - .' e J: 2'0 = £15 ~ :lz ..J ' :: s 11".. 11~ !: !t !~ ~ ~i ii:l . < .. ~ ¿ " 0 e .". iz... . . .. i . ~ ... . - ë i. ¡ B 0 " .. . '" !: !!¡J, " . is . o .". . . :¡ c . '" :¡ I J '_ ' " / , ' · 0 . ~ ~~ ( ~ <:> ~~ \ -1 r-ì ~ UI ~ ¡:::UI \<' \_J ~ ! ~'s J '-.../\, ' , . , .\ . ~ ¡ r" ìJ L.{'~\ ~ r~ '" <J) \ z <:> ø i\\ l-r f'~ ~" I' ! ¡ L, ¡(\( ø J ",," it ,") ¡;j~~ c.: I ~ ¡ ¡:! '" ("'"' ¡,.....-.::=-- I "'::i! \ S' I :;¡!", ___ -.J "" " 'v I r\ , ; n l..J \..." ) / I ~: / / "'* i /"' / I \~ ~ ( / UI "'" "- \ '" '- I \ /'-v:'O ~ ~ <"> (>('~/ '" v v ~ .. <:> z UI ¡¡; \¡' B ~ ffi '" <J) , ~ :i f " . "". " , ~ Ð ~ ". it' ",I!! ~ * 8~ ~ I!j ~../ ~~ tN ¡,> i5 r :n;¿ it i a£< to! 0 !ì: C>UI c>' " ~ ~~ *E .. - f ~~ ª~ 1'/"-/,/ , .. ---" 12'.8 n,; oœ ~_ ø 2 OJ 55 g.8 ~h 3 t: (,) g>c~.. jj!i: =.." D- O ""'5 - 'c i":O OR~ .- Q) .!!1::: 8 Æ'~ _ ~,; ~! C> 1a- x:> C_c i" jj_' o C'; Woo ~ ..~ ~¡:¡i i~~ Ot: -E ~." B~ _I" ,_ .... ¡¡ . , "', ....J Q) 0 0 ~ H §ë~ë R''': :.: - 5 ell c' t u.. ~ !!j ¡¡ ~ 5 <C 'j¡j 1ß ~ ¡t ~ t~ll ;i! t ¡ c.. 0 ga: å.~ _i ._ šî; ':! J!. .... ...J - h i I r~ i ~ -= ~ 'Ë ~ û5 < I ~;j -~ ~ 0; ill äf§ I ...8i ~ Q) ~ :il! I! &" ~ ëî 11 ~ c: - : E ... ~ 011 ~ :: ,.¡ 0; ~i ,,~g - ë: .h" ¡¡illS .ì! ;¡¡ < · ~ E;; E .". ~. ... i 8 _ ~ - ; - ;ª! I -~ : !'J!¡i U " .- i- or: c '8 õ" I § ..9 u o !: ~ U! iŠ . . - "'. . .c C . . '" ::E 3nN3AV (]";?J£ - ~ Z "' .. I ¡ '< '-' ~ ¡:¿ ~~ U ¡:¡ 1M êtž ~ 5 I ¡< ~ <!II!! 1>- "" I'- UJ....I \- I ~ < D.C:< ot ~ 3: , 8 ~ ~ r J ~ < ./ !!J II.... x "' '1:- "" ~ ~ I!! "' " ~ " "' ~ ~ t ~ )/1 ~ ¡ß . - ... ~--~ I ~~~_:r-_______n.________n__~_____ .c: C >-~ õ .; i¡ ",0> c 0 ~~ ~ g ; t~ .- Q) ~ r ~ êtíêtí ~ü .. ~·K.·5 c D-4 Üc: "'>- 5 ¡ C i!îe~ O~ a.", ,. ,~'q" :.: -IQ) c]! ~ ~ . ~ :~~ '" E~ O~ I: ~ E Ii C 011 ~ < 0< '" U!.; i I Hi "- a. 0 ~ ,,~ . J i . i.- ~~ '" t5 0> r ,Ii s ì\' ¡ ¡j 5" ¡j Z t8.-'~ i!j Q) ; ~ I t ~ ~'iS 'Ë a: sl ~ ~ s ~ : ~ ! ,:~ ! ..J .. fi ;; ~ J ~ '" ï "I Ii ~. "i < . - e I . C ,OIl C - ~ ~t" e ~ ë ~ u I ~ '" . sa .. . 0 - :~ : ! ~ s > . ~I ~c :1 c: R· R .1i ... i; = 8.!- ::;] : o~ 0 0 2 : ~ a_ ~ 2_ u¡ ... - ::;] c. .... Q. . \ (. Q ~ I " 'I \ ~! l j ; I ~~ ~~ l§(f) ,c.!) :D~ I ~! 1\ ¡¡ ¡ ! ~~ ~ h}' I I <UJ ~ I ~~ < I, ! ¡~ § ;xç; 111 ffi~ ~ I I!" ,,¡¡¡ d ~ !!~ ~~ ... _*~4Ø yY' .... ~-I1-~-\ \ -~-~ < ......-... .. -,". , < . u ëS '. ~ z < .-/': :I: , " ~ az ':>L ...J§ 0 / ...J ~ t3 [ < UJUJ / ;¡: !!zz !! UJ 5 is / í~~\~B:: z 6 ~ ~~ < U <QW~ :i 0. ~ W \I) W LiJ ~~Q~ Ql \I) D.:.. W ~ E ~ ~~~L ':>L ~ ~ ~ ~~ ...J Ql W t: ~ < !! ~ UJ ~ " u I'! " 5 !! u ¡2 Z \!) >- UJ " Z Z ~ 1= 1= '" Z ;¡ UJ => ~ J'1'¡/t? ~ Q U ¡ _.._m.__ ATTACHMENT "E" DATE: December 9, 1994 TO: Jerry Foncerrapa Deputy Director of Parks VIA: Captain Jim Zoll~~nve~tigative Division FROM: MaZ1' Jane DiospadoJŽ! . Sen10r Crime Prevent on Specialist SUBJECT: Relocation Restrooms, Memorial Park Issue I have reviewed the information and issues re~arding this project and have discussed my recommendation with Pol1ce Administration. We have assessed all of the ~roposed locations and concluded that all the locations are sui tab e from a law enforcement point of view. However, I have some concerns and comments regarding each location as they are described within the report. Present Master Plan Location A: Based on the concerns from the residents that spoke at the council meeting 09/20/94, one resident thought the site would be a 'danger' to the children living at One Park because it was in front of their complex. My concerns are that if it is set back into the park too far, this will make surveillance difficult for patrolling officers. Also, the report refers to increasin~ the number of trees around the site to shield it from the res1dents at One Park. I disagree, increasing the number of trees around the restrooms so the residents don't have to see it, ma¥ only invite more less desirable subjects because it is h1dden. Alternate B Location: In view of the fact the present (existing) location has many disadvantages for other cit¥ departments and the Mater Plan location is under scrutiny, th1S location is highly acceptable for law enforcement because of the visual factors. The increase in lighting that extends from the Third Avenue business district and the proximity to the parking lot and Third Avenue traffic makes this location more suitable. Alternate C Location: This location currently has acceptable visual factors for surveillance by police. However, based on the state of the current structure and the recommended re-location of the structure, moving the structure further into the park would decrease the ability to observe activity from a patrol vehicle. Alternate D Location: This location has no significant impact on police services. It has clear visibility from the street and is not shielded by trees. In the past, many of the crime concerns regarding the restroom site within this park have been perhaps exaggerated or unfounded. However, as no one can predict the future we must always take the necessary steps in order to continue to ~revent and deter crime from occurring within this and all the C1ty parks within the city. 1'1 ~ 17 ~'-"--"---"--'--~---------~---'-------'-~---"'-"-'-'-------.-~..--_., ----~ - E-2 Crime prevention through enVironmental design can not alwars solve all the crime issues, a though it fosters an ownersh p to the propertr surrounding one's own, creating a greater defensible space. A w llingness to preserve it for the good of the community. Thank you for the opportunity to have input in the planning process. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me anytime. . - co: Brookover, CAM .. ¡"../'it' --_.._._---_._---_.~---,.,_._--,.._-------------- --------"---_.._. Item 17~ Meeting Date Jpýj,r r l\1EMO DATE: MARCH 6, 1995 TO: THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: SHIRLEY HORTON, MAYOR iff SUB]ECf: RECOMMENDED APPOINTMENT OF MS. JUDY SCHULENBERG TO THE CITIZEN AT LARGE SEAT ON THE BA YFRONT CONSERVANCY TRUST BOARD OF DIRECTORS In accordance with the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Bayfront Conservancy Trust (BCT), the Chula Vista City Council appoints a Citizen-at- large representative to the BCT Board of Directors. The Chairman of the BCT Board, who is also the Mayor, makes a nomination for this seat. The purpose of this memo is to recommend that the Chula Vista City Council appoint Judy Schulenberg to the Citizen-at-Large Seat (#8). The term of appointment for this seat is two years. The appropriate section of the By-Laws which specifies how Board Members are selected is reproduced below. The Directors shall not be elected by the members, but shall be designated as to their numbers, representative capacities, voting rights, and such other rights by the By-Laws of the Corporation, which may from time to time be established and amended at the discretion and majority vote of the Board of Directors. .., the Board Will consist of ... (8) a citizen-at-large appointee of the Chula Vista City Council;... No Special provisions apply to Seat #8 Ms. Schulenberg has been a volunteer at the Chula Vista Nature Center since 1987 and is a trained Docent. She has been an active member of the BCT Board of Directors since 3/26/91. She does public outreach for the Nature Center by presenting programs with the Center's educational animals to after- I?~ - / __ __ "_._.___._..U".._._.__~._._____..____·_._.U·___'_"_____' ,__ page 2. 3/7/95 school youth groups. She also leads Sunday Strolls at Loews Coronado Bay Resort and Second Look! weekend walks. A long-term resident of the South Bay, Judy is a retired elementary school teacher and past member of The Chula Vista Elementary School Board. She ardently believes in strong science education and advises the Nature Center on curriculum development. She is currently on the Board of Governors of Southwestern College and on the Board of the Chula Vista Heritage Museum. Judy is active with the American Association of University Women, the Chula Vista Republican Women, and Saint Marks Lutheran Church. Her educational and community experience gives additional depth to the Board of Directors of the BCT. /7ç.. -..2. ---..- ~-..-.----...-_._-.- -_.~- . ..-"---.---...-..-.......----". ,------- Item I?øv Meeting Date ;h'lft5 MEMO DATE: MARCH 6, 1995 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL VIA: JOHN GOSS, CITY MANAGER Jí~ 1~ FROM: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BA YFRONT CONSERVANCY TRUST SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED APPOINTMENT OF MS. SUSAN FULLER TO THE VOLUNTEERS OF NIC SEAT ON THE BA YFRONT CONSERVANCY TRUST BOARD OF DIRECTORS In accordance with the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Bayfront Conservancy Trust (BCT), the volunteers of the Chula Vista Nature Center met on January 21, 1995 to chose a nominee to be their representative on the BCT Board of Directors. Ms. Susan Fuller was unanimously elected to be that nominee. The purpose of this memo is to transmit the volunteer's recommendation that the Chula Vista City Council appoint Susan Fuller to the Volunteer Seat (#12). The term of appointment for this seat is two years. The appropriate section of the By-Laws which specifies how Board Members are selected is reproduced below. Some background on the qualifications of Ms. Fuller is presented below. The Directors shall not be elected by the members, but shall be designated as to their numbers, representative capacities, voting rights, and such other rights by the By-Laws of the Corporation, which may from time to time be established and amended at the discretion and majority vote of the Board of Directors. ... the Board will consist of ... (12) a representative from the volunteers of the Chula Vista Nature Interpretive Center. Special provisions apply to the following numbered seats: ... (12) The volunteers of the Chula Vista Nature Interpretive Center shall elect a Docent, by simple majority vote, and recommend that Docent's appointment by the Chula Vista City Council for a two-year term: / 7~ -.3 .... --~"_.._---,----_.._-_._-~-_._,-----,-_. page 2. 3/7 /95 Ms. Fuller has been a volunteer at the Chula Vista Nature Center since 1987 and is a trained Docent. She has been an active member of the BCT Board of Directors since 7/25/92. She is active with the Center's education programs and is a member of the bird crew. Ms. Fuller is currently serving on the City of Chula Vista's Planning Commission. A long-time resident of Chula Vista, Ms. Fuller has always had an interest in education. She is a former Board member of the Chula Vista Elementary School District and is a founding member of the Starlight Center and was a board member of the South Bay Chapter of the Association of Retarded Citizens. Your kind attention to this matter will be most graciously appreciated. J 7ø.. ~1 .~-.---- ____~.~_.'~__n_.__ ..____._.......____._______., .___,. . . n ~(~ -.- .......,...;.,..;; -=-= ......- -- - CI1Y OF CHUlA VISTA MEMORANDUM March 13, 1995 TO The Honorable City Council FROM Shirley Horton, MaYOrj~ r SUBJECT : City Council Offices Refurbishing and Installation of Security Measures As you are all well aware, the City Council offices were in need of major refurbishing and updating when I took office as Mayor. A portion of this work has been completed, however there still remains some significant improvements which would provide each of us with a more conducive and comfortable work area, The work which remains to be completed is the installation of a security door system which will provide the ability to securely monitor the - access into Mayor and Council office areas. In addition, the lobby area, the Council conference room and Council offices are severely in need of update, and it is recommended that the walls be repainted and texturized as well as replacing the curtains with blinds. I have also included on the Attachment I the cost to re-carpet the Lobby area, Council Offices and Council conference room. This amount of $6,750 has not been included in the figures listed in this memo, but is included as an option to fund should Council wish to do so. In order to complete this refurbishing project, the total amount required is $15,983.10 (See Attachment I for specifics). As Council is aware from the City Manager's January 16, 1995 memo, we have already set aside $2,800 in savings from the fiscal 93/94 City Council budget, leaving a total of $13, 138,10 remaining to be funded. Staff had previously identified in that January 16 memo a $7,800 encumbran¢e from FY 1993-94 for a Jaycee event as a potential funding source for the remodel, but those funds have not been transferred or spent yet and may not be appropriate for this purpose. There has been some conftJsion over a prior encumbrance which is clarified by staff in an attached memo. The following are alternatives which can be used to complete this project: 1. In the current fiscal year 94/95 City Council budget I have identified $7,800 from accounts which we may be able ~to do without for this fiscal year and transfer those funds for completion of this refurbishing project. Those funds which are available are: I?}; -- / ",.- . ,,-, ' , ,.,--. -------..~.....~_.L........, ""'-'"'-... '._ _.~......,-...-~........-.....~ . . . The Honorable City Council March 10, 1995 Page 2 a. Account 5201 ("Professional Services") - $2,500. These funds were set aside for assistance in media and consulting, which I do not anticipate using prior to the end of this fiscal yeat. b. Account 5221 ("Travel, Conferences and Meetings") - $5,000, The current year's City Council budget will not be fully expended as we have not been able to attend the conferences originally scheduled. As a result we will have $5,000 remaining at a minimum at the end of this fiscal year. This will leave funds for any unanticipated trips and cover the cost of the Japan trip as we previously authorized. c. Account 5224 ("Training - City Personnel") - $300, The current year's budget also contains $300 for training funds which are not anticipated to be used. 2. There also still remains $7,400 in the Council Contingency Fund for the current fiscal year which would be an approptiate use for this project. It is recommended that we use only $5,383.10 for this project which will leave $2,016.90 for any further needs in this fiscal year. 3. A memo from the City Manager dated January 16, 1995 regarding this issue stated that there was $7,800 remaining in Account #100-0132-5451 ("Contributions Other Agencies"). It was identified that this money was officially set aside for the Chula Vista Jaycees to operate the Fiesta de la Luna Parade during fiscal year 93/94. The Jaycees did not have this event, and these funds are still encumbered. I do not recommend that these funds be used for this purpose however as an alternative Council could authorize their transfer and utilization for the proposed renovation. 4. In addition, there is $7,998 in Account 100-0730-5399 ("Council Contingency Funds") from fiscal year 93/94 which Cøuncil could authorize to be placed toward this project. I also do not recommend that we use these funds for this project. . I am assured that should Council choose to not use these two prior year encumbrances, then both of these encumbrances will be clo$ed and returned to fund balance. In the following funding, I recommend that we do not use the prior year (FY 1993/94) funds from the Jaycees or the prior year Coumcil Contingency and recommend that this money be returned to fund balance and those encumbrances be closed. Should Council prefer that we not use a large portion of the current year's (FY 1994/95) Council Contingency budget or projected savings in our current year's budget for this purpose, it may be an appropriate alternative to instead appropriate the necessary remaining amount from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund reserve. /7 b -'é}.. ~.. 1>. ".........., ------ - - ------ --_._~---~-- ~- --~_. ___ n_ ,,~___ . - The Honorable City Council March 10, 1995 Page 3 Recommendation Based on all of this information, I would recommend that Council authorize the following funding sources to be used for the proposed renovation project: Savings from City Council Budget FY 93/94 2,800.00 Savings from FY 94/95 City Council :Budget Professional Services 2,500.00 Travel 5,000.00 Training 300,00 Council Contingency for FY 94/95 5.383.10 Total Amount Needed $15,983.10 Should Council desire to complete re-carpeting for the Lobby, Council Offices and Council Conference room additional funds of $6,750 would need to be appropriated. I would recommend that this come from the unappropriated balance of the general fund. . B1\(DH)\MA YOR.OFF ) 7 P -;3 ..f'-"~' , "",. - - --- ~ --"~--~ --~~---- . . . . . ATTACHMENT I Refurbishinl! and Security Measures Actual and Proposed Costs Vendor PO# Pu ose Cost Dixiline Lumber 205235 Drywall material $240.77 Bonita Valley 205235 Carpet $702.00 Floorcovering Frazee 205235 Paint and Wall covering $1,298.00 Jim French Shutters 205235 Shutters $1,490,00 Shore Office Furniture None Desk, Credenza, and Lateral $4,659.32 File Shore Office Furniture None Guest Chairs (6) $1,889.62 Levitz Furniture None Side Table $128,39 Unknown Vendor* None Electronic Security Door, $4,600.00 Purchase and Installation Unknown Vendor* None Paint and Texture for Council $525.00 Lobby, Council Offices and Conference Room Unknown Vendor* None Blinds, Purchase and $450.00 Installation SII b-total $15,983.10 Possible Option Unknown Vendor· None Carpet for Council Lobby, $6,750.00 Council Offices and Conference Room . Total With Carpet $22,733.10 ·Where possible staff will perform noted activity I- /7þ-Y ~, ......rll I Lie.m Ç? lÂ. - MEMORANDUM March 9, 1995 TO: city council ~, ;[G VIA: John D. Goss, City Manager JI ~ FROM: Robert W. Powell, Director of Finance~ SUBJECT: Administrative Regulation for Encumbrances This is an informational item submitted in response to comments from Councilman Rindone at the Council Meeting of February 21, 1995, regarding the budget process and authorization of Mayor/Council expenditures. ENCUMBRANCES IN GENERAL An encumbrance is a commonly used accounting entry that basically reserves available appropriations in the amount of the encumbrance for a specific purpose. The most common type of encumbrance is a purchase order encumbrance which, as the title indicates, reduces available appropriations by the amount of an outstanding purchase order commitment. When the terms of the purchase order are actually fulfilled and payment is made, an expenditure is recorded reducing available appropriations and the encumbrance is deleted. Encumbrances are also widely used as a budgetary control tool to enable management to temporarily "freeze" specific appropriations when budgeted resources are determined to be uncertain or unavailable. At the end of each fiscal year, outstanding encumbrances are normally carried forward into the subsequent fiscal year along with the related prior year appropriation. Appropriations remaining unspent and unencumbered at year end become resources available for appropriation by the legislative body in the subsequent fiscal year. Therefore, in order to maximize the resources available for appropriation, only those encumbrances representing a valid outstanding commitment should be carried forward into the next fiscal year. CITY OF CHULA VISTA PRACTICE In past years it was not uncommon for departments to request and receive encumbrances for a, portion of unspent appropriations at fiscal year end in order to 'fund the completion of pending projects in the subsequent year. The encumbrance was accomplished by issuing a purchase order under a temporary vendor name which was subsequently replaced with the actual vendor in the next fiscal year to enable expenditure of the funds. This practice has been curtailed in recent years through a much more restrictive /~~ - / .-- ~-~~--~------- -",._-_.-----------------~~-_._.,-----"-_._._-_. administrative review of year end encumbrances which conforms better with good accounting practice. There was a question raised about the encumbrances carried over at the end of FY93-94. The following information recaps the encumbrance activity at year end. If desired, a similar recap can be given to City Council at the end of FY94-95 and each subsequent fiscal year end within thirty days after the end of the fiscal year. The City of Chula vista issued 2,590 purchase orders in FY93-94 with 201 of them issued in June, 1994. Of those two hundred, twelve specified that they were for encumbrance of funds only (temporary vendor) and that a requisition would be required with specific items and valid vendor name after 7/1/94. The temporary purchase orders were as follows: 1) $9,973 - Fire Department to temporary vendor Execu-Fit Health Program. Subsequent change orders issued 12/94 for $4,350 to Richter Group to provide communications consulting services and 2/95 for $4,000 to Reid/Moomaugh & Associates, Inc. for organizational development consulting services. 2) $3,500 - Public Works to temporary vendor California Electric to provide electrical materials for completion of minor CIPs #4, 12, 17, 22 & 23 from the FY93-94 work program. 3) $3,800 - Public Works to temporary vendor Cal Dor Specialties, Inc. for FY93-94 minor CIP #17. Subsequent change order issued 2/95 awarding work to Cal Dor Specialties, Inc. for $3,035. Work pending. 4) $2,600 - Public Works to temporary vendor Plenums Plus for FY93-94 minor CIP #14. 5) $3,000 - Public Works to temporary vendor Anytime Signs for refurbishment of the civic Center signs. 6) $3,000 - Public Works to temporary vendor R.B. smith Heating and Sheet Metal for minor CIP #11. 7) $1,500 - Public Works to temporary vendor Geo Systems for SDG&E energy audit. Work completed and PO closed. 8) $10,798 - Admin from Council/Mayor accounts to temporary vendor Office Pavilion for office furniture and accessories. Subsequent change orders issued 12/94 to Shore Office Furniture for $4,659.32 (unpaid), 12/94 Jim French Custom Drapes for $1,490.00, 1/95 Bonita Valley Floorcovering $702.00, 2/95 Frazee Paint & Wall Covering $1,298.00, Dixieline Lumber Co. $240.77. /~ --2 "._ __~___...._.._. - __~. ._..~._..__ ___~____._____...._.__..__._.._.____.____._ ___ .________.__ _0- ___ _ ~__.._____.___..__.,_...,,~____.____._.._._ 9) $500 - Nature Center to temporary vendor Wertz Tile to repair broken/missing tile on petting pool. 10) $600 - Nature Center to temporary vendor Bazark Lighting Inc. for lighting repair. 11) $23,655 - Park and Rec to temporary vendor for a central control irrigation system. Subsequent contract awarded 10/95 to Hydro-scape Products with work pending. 12) $1,230 - Management and Information Services to temporary vendor for microdyne a-port 10 base T netware access server. Purchased 10/94 from Egghead. As time permits, we are also reviewing existing encumbrances established in fiscal years prior to FY93-94 to insure that these items are also in conformance with the proposed procedure. In order to make totally clear that the appropriate practice for the processing of encumbrances is followed, to formalize the existing budgetary control process, and to further insure that resources available to the council for appropriation are maximized each fiscal year, an administrative regulation for encumbering appropriations (draft attached) will be issued. The proposed regulation authorizes the use of encumbrances for routine purchase commitments and budgetary control purposes, as well as significantly limits the use of encumbrances to carry forward unspent appropriations to subsequent years to only those requirements specifically approved by Councilor the City Manager. The draft regulation also reiterates the criteria for approval for expenditure out of the city Council Contingency Account. This is an additional specific approval process that applies only to this account. Based on the draft administrative procedure, the approval of the City Manager or designee would be required for encumbrances such as the twelve purchase orders mentioned above. Any previous purchase orders that do not conform to the regulation will be closed in FY94-95. What is in the policy is consistent with general municipal accounting practices and the practice of other local agencies. Any comments you may have on the draft regulation would be welcomed. rwp:M:\data\mcmos\director/encwnb.rwp /~~~3 _.-~~-'-'---_._.----.._-.-..-.------- ---~-~---_...._--_._._--_.,-_._-_. U,r..·····\:.I. K·¡;2:~A7C r';;;:.;'é'¡~T· '-' "::J'," ~..~' _r 0 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE - . r- Date: March 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Administrative Regulation of Encumbrances I. PURPOSE This procedure describes how the City will administer encumbrance of funds. II. PROCEDURE A. Encumbrance of funds shall be for the following purposes: 1. Purchase Order Encumbrances - Encumbrance of funds by the regular purchasing procedure governed by Municipal Code Chapter 2.56, Purchasing System. Encumbrances shall be for specific purchase order commitments where the City has entered into agreement to purchase goods or services from a specific vendor. At the end of each fiscal year, outstanding encumbrances will be carried forward into the subsequent fiscal year along with the related appropriation. 2. Budgetary Control Encumbrances - Encumbrance of funds for the purpose of "freezing" appropriations until revenue is received or when availability of revenue is uncertain. This type of encumbrance is not related to any commitment and will be closed prior to year-end closing. 3. Encumbrance of funds until a specific purchase order is issued - This is an exceptional situation that occurs near the end of a fiscal year when funds are specifically appropriated for an approved program or project, but there is insufficient time to award a contract or select a vendor prior to year-end processing. Funds will be encumbered without a vendor designation. The appropriation and encumbrance will be carried forward to the new fiscal year. When the vendor selection process is completed, the encumbrance will be designated to the selected vendor. If not specifically approved by Council Resolution or minute order, encumbrances made under this situation will require the specific approval of the City Manager or his/her designee. The specific purchase order will be issued to the selected vendor within 120 days from the beginning of the following fiscal year or the encumbrance will be cancelled. /~(Â~ ./ ____.___~~.______.__._.______...____~._____.___,.,,_,.__.____..__ .~M_... ,,__._,__.,_ ._...__..'. _,.,____,___ 4. Encumbrance of staff time for Capital Improvement Projects - charges for city staff time spent on Capital Improvement Projects are transferred from the specific projects to the General Fund to reimburse General Fund costs. To set aside the anticipated staff costs, funds are encumbered from the specific projects. At the end of each fiscal year, outstanding encumbrances will be carried forward into the subsequent fiscal year to insure maximum reimbursement. B. Any encumbrance, expenditure or transfer of funds out of the City council contingency Account requires city Council action by a majority of the council members. c. Prior to fiscal year end, Finance will review encumbrances to establish the continued validity of outstanding encumbrances. This will be done with the assistance of the departments affected. Any purchase orders deemed no longer needed will be closed with the funds returning to fund balance. D. In all cases, encumbrances to temporary vendors for the sole purpose of carrying over appropriations are not authorized. E. This procedure is in effect when issued and any outstanding encumbrances not in accordance with the policy will be closed prior to the end of fiscal year 1994-95. F. This procedure also applies to the Redevelopment Agency. smc: \users\susanc\puradrel.doc /3'4-'5' __~~_~____.__..___.________..._ "n_' _,_,__..___.". "._.._.___'.. __.__~.__._____~____ __..____ ____'._,____________.____.. \,"C ! Cd ( #/}( 3- FI-7'~ February 23, 1995 MEMO TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council John Goss, City Manager } ., l " .(/ r\"r!" '\ FROM: Jerry R. Rindone, Deputy Mayor Ji' . ,! SUBJECT: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOR BUDGET PROCESS and AUTHORIZATION OF MAYOR/COUNCIL EXPENDITURES FOR 2/28/95 COUNCIL MEETING At the City Council meeting of 2/21/95, I indicated under my Council comments that I would forward supporting documents for the City Council item regarding the budget process and authorization of Mayor/Council expenditures. This information is being sent . to you as Council Information in your packet. In addition, during my conversation with our City Manager, I had indicated that I would provide copies to everyone concerned prior to review and discussion of this item. JRR:pw Encls. J'ð¿¿-7 - ,-----_.-.,.~--~-_.__..~ ---_._,--,--~.-- ----~---_._... -,----~---- ...-.......--..--..---..-- I',IJ " January 16, 1995 TO: Councilman Jerry Rindone ('¡ FROM: John D. Goss, city Manage04 ~X tlJt.\ SUBJECT: Response to questions regarding ~ayor's office remodel Per your request, attached are copies of the current year's Council budget, including expenditures to date, by month. Also attached is a copy of the December of 1994 Summary for the Non-Departmental budget where the Council Contingency funds are budgeted. No funds have been expended from this year's Council Contingency account ~. yet, although $1,000 was approved on 12/06/94 by Resolution 17742 ~'~ for the Legislative Office Building remodel. lP ~, ( Encumbered Funds . ~~ 1Jt""'" II Funds for the Mayor's Office remodel were encumbered f~monies \ remaining in the Council budget at the closeout of FY 1993-94 and .),0 from a FY 93-94 Jaycees Community promo...!......", ...................... J..ur an ,r-~~activity which did not take place that year. The account detail is . / # as follows: ~~.., 100-0105-5105 $ 1,500 Hourly wages (vacation relief) ~ 100-0105-5212 1,000 Printing and binding "' . 100-0105-5224 300 Training account 100-0132-5~ ,.~uu ~ntributions Other Agencies $10,600 In addition to these funds, staff anticipated the possibility of a new Council wanting additional funds. In anticipation of the request for additional funding, the remaining funds from the FY 93- 94 Council Contingency account were reserved in an encumbrance. It was intended that if Council requested additional funds that these could be identified and Council action could authorize their use. The amount set aside was $7,998. Mayor's Office Remodel To date $8,437 has been expended or is anticipated for shutters ($1,490), furniture ($6,245) and carpeting ($702). Remaining cost for wallpaper, paint and' moldings is unavailable at this time. Staff will forward this information as soon as possible. "AS a result of your questions, staff had found that the shutters had been inadvertently charged to the Council Contingency encumbrance last week. Since the accounting period has not ended this transaction will be corrected to show the charge to the $10,600 encumbrance identified above. cc: Mayor and City Council ;8'"cy-y __~~~__.__~_.._____~__.~~_..____.._.~__.___.___._.. __,'_",__",____u__'. ~._ .. ______.~.__.. "ß1 ~!~ -.- r~_ --.,.......;:' - - 01Y Of CHUlA VISTA MEMORANDUM January 19, 1995 TO · The Honorable Mayor and City Council · VIA · John D. Goss, City Manager f ~ · FROM : Sid W. Morris, Assistant City Manager ~ SUBJECT · Encumbered Council Contingency Funds · Recently, Councilmember Rindone requested staff to provide him with information regarding the City Council budget including a current copy of Council budget expenditures and specifically expenditures related to the renovation of the Mayor's office. This information was provided to Councilmember Rindone and copied to all members of the City Council. In prepañng this information, staff also informed Council that approximately $8,000 in prior year Council contingency monies had been encumbered, as these monies wte unspent. Staff took this ~ action in a proactive manne~in preparatipn for unanticit!ated reQuests y the new Council to be installed in office effective December, 1994. Unfortunately, as was pointed out by Councilmember Rindone, i staff nev r informed the Council of this action, nor made Council aware that these funds were available. : e purpose 0 this memo is to adVIse you tbât tlùs was l' purely an oversight on staff's part; our a,ction was meant to be proactive and to help assist the new City Council with any future requests. ¡,J V) Council sbould be aware tbat the action to encumber these funds was unique in nature. Finance p response to an action taken by Council. To ensure that this practice is continued and that the integrity of the budget process is maintained, the ç!!y Manager will approve all future :eø'J encumbrances. 1:\CDI95)\IUDGET .CC IK~-I - . " -- _.-_._--_._....-~--_._..- .. -_.._-_.__.~--- -"- lie' Section 1004 (continued) certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the person retained by the city council to perform auditing functions for the Council and a further copy shall be placed and shall remain on file in the Office of the City Clerk where it shall be available for inspection. The budget so certified shall be reproduced and copies made available for the use of departments, offices and agencies of the City. ~ 10~5~ Budaet. Aqt>rot>riations. From the effective date of the budget, the several amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures shall be and become appropriated to the several departments, offices and agencies for the respective objects and purposes therein named. All appropriations shall lapse at the end of the fiscal year to the extent that they shall not have been expended or lawfully encumbered exce¡:t_ appropriations for specific ca2-ital projects > inçomplete at ~e end of the fiscål year. -- At any meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by the . affirmative votes of at least four members. Sec. 1006. Tax Limits. The tax limit for any ad valorem tax on real property shall be as prescribed by Article XIIIA of the Constitution of the State of California. Sec. 1007. Tax Svstem. The procedure for the assessment, levy and collection of taxes upon property, taxable for municipal purposes may be prescribed by ordinance of the City Council. Sec. 1008. Bonded Debt Limit. The city shall not incur an indebtedness evidenced by general obligation bonds which shall in the aggregate exceed the sum of fifteen percent (15\> of the total assessed valuation, for the purposes of City taxation, of all the real and personal property within the city. No bonded indebtedness which shall constitute a general obligation of the City may be created unless authorized by the affirmative votes of two-thirds of the electors voting on such proposition at any election at which the question is submitted to the electors and unless in full compliance with the provisions of ) 8" tJt- - / t? ---_.,_....~....,.,-_.._-;-_.~--_._._~---,.__.._.---,._,._~---_.--- --....-- -- ---.- _ _____ _.~._____... ._m~__ :. PURCHASING DIVISION PURCHASE ORDER No,l :'I,;~Ú-,:;, / "D . 315 FOURTH AVE., SUITE P ,~~ .CHULA "VIsTA, CA 91910 CITY OF CHULA VISTA THIS ORDER NUMBER MUST APPEt.; (619) 691~5141 ON INVOICES. PACKAGES AND PAPE.R FA)( (619) 58&9118 RELATING TO THIS ORDER. .. . 06/24/94 . INSTRUCTIONS' 91814 NO CHARGE FOR PACKING OR DRAYAGE WIll. BE ALLOWED UNLE5 !oFFICE PAVILION SPECIFIED ON THIS ORDER. IF COMPLETE SHIPMENT CANNOT BE MADE AS SPECIFIED, OR IF AN ~-I< COX we CHANGES ARE REOUIRED, NOTIFY THE PURCf lASING AGEN 9220 TRADE PLACE I IMMEDIATELY, SAN PIECO CA 921:<:6 SHOW SALES TAX AS A SEPARATE ITEM ON INVOICE. INVOICES WITH PREPAID TRANSPORTATION CHARGES MUST BI ~L' . . SUPPORTED BY ORIGINAL RECEIPTED BIll., MAIL DUPLICATE INVOICE TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT ¡lied in WltPllnlruC11On1. P.O, BOX 1087, CHULA VISTA CA 91912 must ADMINIS~RATIO~ D~PT SID OR QUOTE Deli....r dI from reCeipt of order NO F,D.B. CHULA VISTA TERMS ~IRMING ~ET NOT CAT' l; IJB'." . (q)ERED _SO DESCRIPTION UNfT PRICE '"0.''' r' OUANTITY UNIT STOCK NO '. .~: OFFICE FUJUd1UIŒ, Ahw ACCE<;::i(j"I.J:.S 1 LOT Al-jOUNT ~OT 'fO EXCE~D 107S8.0CÚ 1Q)98.( (ADMt;/PS16036) . THIS PURCHASE OkDJ:.R 1& ~~k ENCUMBRAN¢E OF FY 93/S4 ", J;'UNDS OtiI.Y. - A PURCHASE REQUISITIOh hILL hAVE TO BE SUB~ITTED AFTER 7/1/94 ~ . , LISTI~G TtE ITEM, F-E(UE;::i1'ED AhD , VEt;DúR'S ·AJ-,E. A ChAhCE ú¡:¡UER KILL BE P~úCESSED AND MAILED TO T~E VEt;OOR. NQ PhO~E ORDERS ARE ACCEPTAbLE TO'rAL 1079&.(, ~.~ . ~'- - . ~._------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "., iol1,~UND DEPT OBJECT PROJECT AhOli/l¡l' OVRw TAX f/C I'URChASI~G AGE~T ;.;¡r~100 ·01055105 1,500.00 0 0 JAMES V. ESPINOSA' ~~~100 0105· 5212 . 1,000.00 0 0 ~\ 1'100 0105"" 300.00 0 0 ~~OO;~\'J.]30' 5399 7,998.00 0 0 , ..~; :··_4·..'t~;.r.' . :~. -. . TOTAL 10,798.00 ) )i:: '<},;('. . . '~. , , < .. ," ,'-' J~~ -'// . ~ . -.' PURCHASING DEPT. :.,.. ""f"-" - _._-------_.._---_.~-~._---_._~._.~-,---" .._..,._-_._..__._.~-_..~---_._._,~-- r-- - - ~~ft.- REQUISITION I DlPA....."'T "QUI,IT"'H H""". I o stORES ~ PURCHASING ijffj PlEASE rulNISH TWE FOlLOWtNC AHD DElI'IP TO THE AlTlClES 01 SUVICES IEQUEST[D AlE ~K[n""v TO 'loprltV CONOUCT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEMITM(HT FUNDS A.. AVAIlAIU IN Administration 1}o(E CUUENT IUOCET. Oly OF CHUtA VISTA ON 01 IEFOI' n AIITWOalZ£D liCHArval I'UICHASIC AGENt IOVAL IV 10.... IV fWAHCE NftOVAl IV ACCOUNTNUWU. See Below -...---. ~UANTlTV STOCK - QUANTITY UNIT R QUESTED UNIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION FURNISHED PRICE AMOUNT Office Furniture. and accessories --- ENCUMBER ONLY...AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED ----. Vendor: \~\ It - ~ --.__._-- 'Û xxxxxSlx' -.- --- .-- From Accounts: 100-105-5105 $1 500 .----....- ._._-- 100-Ï05-5212 1.000 100-105-5224 300 - -- 100-0730~5399 .9 8 10 798 - ,- ....-- -- ---,,- - - rüõ¡y--'¡ OIoT£ a£cIMD. aø:MD IV I ptJC£D AND ,0000D I ~HASEOIDUM!R 1:!jš..ëi5Tõffi_Kï 05d- ~s "1-'036. .._.0_-- --- - --_._~ f~"~ /8" a- - /Ä - ...-- _0__.- -- .---. _.~._"---------_._-,...._--. --- _._- .-.,---- - -,..--.....--.--..... ,.:-~tH;.s¡NG DMSIJN PURCHASE ORDER No.1 "u..>"..>~ , 'c 3'~ FOURTH AVE."SUITE P ~HlJ'...A VISTA, CA 91910 CITY OF CHULA VISTA THIS ORDER NuMBER VUST APPEA· (619) 691·5141 or-..¡ INVOICES PACKAGES Ar-.C Pt..PE.I·- Fþ')((6'1I)~118 RELATING TO T"'15 O~DEF! O~TE 06/24/94 INSTRUCTIONS: 10R NO. 95782 NO CHARGE FOR ""CKING OR DRAYAGE WILL BE ALLOWED UNLESS rDO~~TO~N BUS1~ESS A~5úC. SPECIFIED ON THIS ORDER, TO: IF COMPLETE SHIPMENT CANNOT BE MACE AS SPECIFIED, OR IF ANY C/O DOÞ.NA hA~K, TlŒhS. CHANGES ARE REQUIRED, NOTIFY THE PURCHASING AGEN1 P.O. BO>' 3S1 IMMEDIATELY. ChULA VIS'I'A CA 91912 SHOW SALES TAX AS A SE""RATE ITEM ON INVOICE. INIIOICES WITH PRE""ID TRANSPORTATION CHARGES MUST Sf SUPPORTED BY ORIGINAl RECEIPTED BILL, L MAIL DUPLICATE INVOICE TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT POBOX 1087 CHULA VISTA CA 919'2 I'1J~ 0'O<:!' ~ 5!" hl'~ Jr. acc':wJ¡ r,~ ,",.11'1 -"S"'w:',O:;"'S SHIP TO: COMML~lT~ ú~VLP O~PT BID OR QUOTE 2&3 FIG AVENUE Deliver dava 'rom receipt of order NO CHULA VISTA CK 91910 F.O.B. CHULA VISTA TERMS CONFtRMHG o DO NOT ~ET OUF'UCATE ~M OAOEAED W><SE DESCRIPTION ~T PRICE AMOuNT ~TlTV ....T STOCK NO 1 1 LOT PkOvlúE ADV~RTISING AND 12500.000 1"500.C FROMOTIOhAL ACTIvlTILS IN TOv.N . CENTI<~ 1 PROJECT AREA (CD ,,234/PSI6037) 'fOTAL 1,,500.0 . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~'~D DE~~ OBJ~CT PkOJECT AMO[JN1' OvkD TA)( PIC PURCHASINC AGEt-.'f , ) 9901 5:<:91 12,500.00 0 O' ""'" (fjsmcöA V TOTAL 12,500.00 ( , ¡(/JA Tow,'; ~ I. :s-4fl: SUV(~..s ~ - . ~ , - I - , ~ . - . -' - , ", .- f --.-- J~ð- //3 ... .. J ~ ., . f;- a 0 FINANCE DBPT. \ ----------- -.--------- -.----- ------~- - _.__.__.._-_.------_._-_._---~--_..-..__._-~.,_."..._. ... .m_._ .... ____.~___.~_.._____._.___.___._ '- '" . J . . ~~I?- ;j :-;~R~~ ~XP~~~~~r~~ ...._. · ~2~!~ -~ ..,. ~ ~~~S( H"It \j·S~ 7H ~O~~OW!"'IC ",...::> J~~tVU iO rT¡.o£ A.nC'Š-O" SU\l'C:~S "~~l5'·tC j"IH NlClSS.....'" TO pt~O l{R~· ~ON~JCT "'4;: ACiIV '!'Ii O~ '!'toI5 :)[p"~N[N'!', ~"I,...::a'u£ .........:I..A..ll ~' COMMUNITY ~EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l"I-4ECVU("''!'al,,;:X;~ .. CITY OF I 6-20-94 , CHUlA VISTA 0,," OIl.IEKJ'''. '~-"-"'.'.'- -" OAr; S'CN,a.rvIU 1 PUIl.CIll....SINc: "'C:E~'" C W·O> 1"':;Jç;?Z"~"OYA" IV I FItQ.""C E Al'"OY"1. 1'1' =:J .ccou>" Mu""EI I , ,," ... ... 990-9901-5291 ~NÌ!TY îUN TT STOC~ - I ....-...... -..... ' -- QUANTIT\! U ¡;¡¡r , R QUESTED I I NU"-'BfR DESCRIPTION FURNISHED' PRICE AMOUNT 1 I I ?,¡)w:4 12,500 I, I --1--. nl.-&.'~"LV l:,'lL.1 i... r."...,Advertising_.anL_ -." ,.- i , " Promotional ~ctivities in Town Centre I i I I -- I PRoiect ~_reð .fu, t~r.. BUVYI11 (1'e/n 1'\,,_ '.__ - -.....--. , I I I r ,. _.... " - - '" I i , , . I. I - In .- - . . \ I ¡-t --+ ~. .n --.-- --...,.- - ì~ ....', N..l I .~ I ---¡- .. ~.._- . L.. I I _. ..~/..._.l...', ~~b-~~1~ ~ ..... I _ . P(,1, 8,.. 'ap.1 I ~. , I ) , i 0. c,.1:¿ I i I . --- I [~--- -.-'" .,...._~. _.....-.- I , _~ Prg';e,t }1ß,,,~,,~r: P~I" 1!'~:'1 . -- j I I . ' t- , -=t=.-- -' .. ~ - .__ ._." n,"._ I I -+- .. - ," , ': - I , ~....,. - .- - ...... -- --- " , ... -.,... ." .. ......-- I ¡ ""EO IY fHREW'EO LWE51Y ¡iO"NO.:O\T!O ~ ~:~:~.~IMC vi, ÕÑ,Y ,~. .. - M'- -- .....-...._.. .. -..- 0" - -,._---%-~_..._-_.__.- --'-- . / q¿:-¿ \ -' .." -- - ,,-' --- -....---- __..n -.- - .... ...~ EO'd BIISSBS 'ON X1;J:I H~nd-1;JlS!^ 1;J1nHO :10 AlIO II'" B2:01 3nl SS-Þ2-N1;Jf _.._--,-_.__.~--_._-----,._-_. ... ."., --,-,-......-,-..---.-..- .. -_.~- ...... --..- ,____.'o___..___________n._._____ ~~DlVISION . PURCHASE ORDER No.1 ",,":>"''';0 / " . 315 FOURTH AVE., SUITE P . CHU!;A VISTA, CA 91910 CITY OF CHULA VISTA TI"'IS ORDER NuMBE¡:¡ 'v'I.ST "'~PE' (619) 691-5141 ON INVOICES PACK..AC,ES A.....C ;:'':''Pf.¡· FAA (619) 585-9118 J/~k /?(ð:# .s 'f-v; RELATING TO THIS ORDE!=< . & C~ 06/24/94 INSTRUCTIONS OR NIt 113466 1(, ØI 0 13 a 1.'-L- NO CHARGE FOR PACKING OR DRAYAGE WILL BE ALLOWED UNLESS TO: !WERTZ '1' I LE ¡U cJ I- (I,'f1 (! It SPECIFIED ON THIS ORDER IF COMPLETE SHIPMENT CANNOT BE MADE AS SPECIFIED, OR IF ANY CHANGES ARE REQUIRED, NOTIFY THE PURCHASING AGENl 9"';050 IMMEDIATELY 33 -05& 9'77/ SHOW SALES TAX AS A SEPARATE ITEM ON INVOICE. , , INVOICES WITH PREPAID TRANSPORTATION CHARGES MUST BE , SuPPORTED BY ORIGINAL RECEIPTED BILL, -, L MAil DUPLICATE INVOICE TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT - r PO BOX 1087, CHULA VISTA, CA 91912 , IS oréermu ! t,11 ,,, ace ,... ....,¡r""st'\,,OCT'CnS ¡SHIP TO: C.V. t.A'1·uIU, CEt.T~k BID OR QUOTE 1000 CUt.PO~DER PT DR 0eI.e' davs from recelþt 01 order NO CHULA VISTA CA ~1~10 F.O,S CHULA VISTA TERMS Œlp8':'..-- NOT NET DUf'UCATE ITEM ORDEAED WHSE DESCRIPTION UNT"""" AMOuNT NO OUNrITlTY \,NT STOCK NO '. REPAIR BROKlN/MISSINC TIL~ ON F-E'l'TING POOL 1 '1 LOT AMOUNT NO~ TO EXCEED 500.000 500.t (NIC 118/PS15546) . . " ThIS F-URCHASE ORDER IS FOR ENCuMBRANCE OF FY 93/~4 :'UNDS ONLY. . A PURCHASE REQuI~ITION WILL HAvE TO BE SUBM1TTED AFTER 7/1/94 LISTING TEE ITlMS REQUEST~D AND vEMiOR'S !,"'ME. A ChANGE ORDER ~ILL BE PRbcESSED AND MAILED TO THE VENDOR. NO ~Hvt.E ORDERS ARE ACCEPTABLE '1'OTAL 500.l ------------~--------------------------------------------------~---------------- FUt.D DEPT OBJEC'!' I'ROJECT AMOuNT O'vRD TAX P/C PURCHASING AGENT 415 4150 ~529 500.00 0 0 JAMES ". ESPINOSA ~ TOTAL 500.00 ¡Ýkiü,u, ~,.¡Ä !£>QhBITJ ~~ l' ) $'0,., /)S_. ( .-, .7 FINANCE DBPT, ""'" - ---------------~- ._-,----'"~----_._~._-----_._---~,....._-_..- -.-,,---. ---_.~-".- -.-- - - ------ -.-.----..-.-.".- ~. ~, ~'r~ . e,-:ro,.."s ._-,-.::-._~., teJ PURCHASING , L\n_',3 ,., ~ .,..sr'"'''''''' 'O.LO"""" ..'0 0""''' TO "'" "TO'"EI O. ...'"~~ .."UElT\?... ~.o."" COJIID\JCT T)4£ Þ\C1'IV\TIU· , TIo!£ 00 ,.1IttE. . FUNDi .." "'~~\A'I.£ IN nli CUU.'-"Ii lu!)CtT ~ Chula Vista ~ature Ce~ter 4/14/94 l\..\<~ an' Of l H v - CHUlA VISJA ON O. Ir.fOlt "...,., ) n40tIUO SICNATUIt IC....'..C ",,,rr ~.."",.~, , "~INISTUtO.'S A. ) )ICVA.L I'" ¡ F:N.ANC( ~O"'Al I'Y. ACCOUN'r HUMIn. i 7I"'L I lIKKi1XXK41S-4150-SS2 STOCK -' - - QUANTITY I aUANTJ:12 uwh DESCRIPTION UNIT AMOUNT I R QUESTED NUMBER ¡:URNISHED PRICE \ 1 :ot ~epair broken/~issing tile on petting 0001 i w¡ t'!I:< not to e:;cicd ~ 500.00 ¡ I \~~ck Xatki~ að' ~~.å _6 -;;.... I r.cumber the fun I-- I to repaIr the pool while they try to locat. I I... tile "')00""_' L/ I - - -~".- .- . o' .... . ,. - - . 'IV ,~..~. . --.....- . ,.~or "..,,-..... \ ( Rick ~atkin to øele~ : I ; '" l '- -' .- I I -.--. ....__.-..-_.~ ! \ I \ I' r I \ \S i..\" I.-I.D , I I I 1 -- . I'-L- .L ·-1 I . \ Pi.,..! I \ I \1r.......L,'. \Je')~L~ \. I . I . " ,-' '. I I .. .--" -- ,----.- 1---- ....- ,-- Nft1.{.Î) ~\,)'i(. - l -, ~wtW\~tAo""\.G. _.- I I I I , , tU,LED I" UCEIVEOIY ""IC ANO 1'01110 . ~oASE 0~01~ NUMIEt . ~s.;)~ ~~.t"""'G "" ON" 0" - - --.-- -_.,-.- .-- AM f 4 _"?("_~ I~.-=-· £J- __' l- i - . " j? a- - / ~ [( _< _.. _oO~__"'_"'. - "·102 (l,Þ711'J ,..,.. .-.-.. -.... ë:O 'd 8116S8S 'ON XI;I.:I HHnd-l;IlSI^ I;IlnHO .:10 AlIO a:ol 3nl Š-6-vë:-Nl;lf --- -.--...---- ....-...-.........----.-..--"....------ - -_._--_...._~ _._--_._--~~ I' c.' \ Description of Account Codes on Purchase Order No. 205235 Fund 100 - General Fund Det>artment Expenditure Account 105 - Council 5105 - Hourly Wages 5212 - Printing & Binding 5224 - Training 730 - Non-Departmental 5399 - contingencies AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA^^AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The description of additional account codes included in the January 16 memo from the City Manager are as follows: . Fund 100 - General Fund Department 132 - Chula vista Jaycees Expenditure Account 5451 -contributions to other Agencies ;3'¿7L -I? .,--- ~. -.~----------,-,_...._,".....'.- -~._._._._....._---- -,,_._,---------- " ._~_.__.,- "tt Prior to the end of a fiscal year, many City departments submitted requisitions to Purchasing equal to the unencumbered balance remaining in a budget account (capital outlay accounts). A purchase order was produced to a fictitious vendor, "Pic and Save" and the funds were encumbered. Most departments has a number of these "Pic and Save" purchase orders on file, often from different fiscal years. These P.O. 's were eventually used to purchase various equipment and/or furniture by submitting another requisition and referencing it to the past years' "Pic and Save" P.O. 's number. Purchasing then prepared a Change Order, a hand typed form that did . not enter the integrated accounting system. The Change Order looked like a P.O. and described the item(s) to be purchased, except for two differences; 1. The description did not merge into the integrated accounting system (as the funds were already encumbered) , and 2. The first line of a Change Order began, "Alternate Vendor: Change vendor name and address to the following:...(Name of new vendor was inserted here). Later in the process accounts payable accounting assistants would enter the vendor name change so that the warrant would reflect the new vendor. - ) Z'éJc. - / g/ ^.~~_..__._"~--~~---'--..--..-.-'---..-..--.-..-..- ..-_...... . .._..._--_.._-~.-._----~-----_._---_.._-----'---. Accounting Program - XAI09 (Note: I may have the numbers incorrect.) When tracking funds or transactions it was helpful to refer to several screens available in the accounting system (these could be accessed as "view only" by many offices): PNA Similar to a word processing screen used to enter text and produce Purchase Orders, you could insert a P.O. number and be able to pull up P.O. text on the screen. PDI Worked in conjunction with the PNA to encumber the funds for the P.O. This screen shows the amounts and budget accounts charged for this expenditure. . 171 Vendor payment records, show P.O. number, vendor name, date, warrant #, and amount. Record could be called up by vendor name or number. .Departments could request computerized reports listing all encumbered amounts in ascending order by P.O. I believe the Pic and Save P.O.'S were shown on this report. These P.O.'S could have several Change Orders issued against them. For instance, a P.O. open from FY '90-'91, #19050 could have Change Orders processed in various amounts to different vendors as Change Order, 19050A, 19050B, 19050C, etc. , each Change Order amount would reduce the balance remaining in the original "Pic and Save" P.O. until it was fully expended. ) Ycv- /9 - ---........-.----.". - -_..__.-----~----- --- ..--.-.--- ------------~~_._-_._--_..---_..," ._--~..__.._~_._._~----- It was also possible for a lot purchase to be made from one vendor involving Change Orders to more than one past fiscal year's "Pic and Save" P.O., using as many as were necessary to accumulate the necessary dollar total. Purchasing assigned the P.O. numbers to the requisitions as they were approved for processing. The start and end P.O. numbers were recorded for each fiscal year allowing easy identification of which fiscal year a Pic and Save P.O. orginated from. /'ð'û -c2iJ --.-' - ----~~-~.--_._--_._-~-_.._~_._.".._._-~._-----