Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1997/04/29 "I declare ynder penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Chu;a 'list.) in Üh1 Office of the City Cle,i< an:) that I :)"'0" od Tuesday, April 29, 1997 this Agenda/Notice 011 the Bulletin ¡)oDrd at Council Conference Room 5:30 p.m. the Public S rvic s Building and at Cit .t<Iall n City Hall Building DATED . ;;¿ . SIGNED ,~ " S ecial Joint Meetin or ho of the Ci Chul taCi Council Planning Commission. and Growth Management Oversight Commission CALL TO ORDER l. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Moot ---,-, Padilla _, Rindone _' Salas _' and Mayor Horton - Planning Commissioners Tarantino _' Aguilar _, Davis _' O'Neill_, Ray _' Thomas~, WilIett_, _~ Ihln_. Growth Management Oversight Commissioners Hubbard _' Allen _' Tarantino _' O'Neill_, Dull_, Hyde _' WilIett_, Peter _, and Kell _. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Growth Management Oversight Commission Minutes from April 10, 1997 (GMOC Members only). 3. PUBLIC HEARING: PCM-97-03; REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION'S I996ANNUALREPORT The GMOC's 1996 Annual Report on compliance with the City's Quality-of-Life Threshold Standards focuses on the period from 7/1/95 to 6/30/96. Pertinent issues identified in latter 1996 and early 1997 are also included. The workshop provides an opportunity to comprehensively review the Report's fmdings and recommendations. Staff recommends that: l. The Planning Commission accept the 1996 GMOC Annual Report and recommendations as presented, and adopt a motion recommending that the City Council do the same; and 2. That Council: a. Accept the GMOC's 1996 Annual Report and the recommendations contained therein; b. Direct staff to undertake the actions necessary to implement those recommendations as presented in the 1996 GMOC Recommendations/Proposed Implementing Actions Summary; . and c. Authorize the Mayor to fmalize and forward to both school districts the draft' Statements of Concern' . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not an item 0'; this agenda for public discussion. (State law, however, genera/ly prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. ADJOURNMENT The City Council will adjourn to the regular City Council meeting on May 6, 1997 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. The Planning Commission will adjourn to the workshop on April 30, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. in Conference Rooms 2 and 3 of the Public Services Building. ---~"~,~,_..,,----_._.._-_._--~--" SPECIAL JOINT MEETING CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION COUNCIL CONFERENCE AGENDA STATEMENT Item 3 Meeting Date 4/29/97 ITEM TITLE: Review and Consideration of the Growth Management Oversight Commission's (GMOC) 1996 Annual Report, PCM-97-03. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_NoX) On April 10, 1996, the GMOC finalized its 1996 Annual Report to the City Council regarding compliance with the City's Quality-of-Life Thresholds Standards. The Report focuses on the period from July I, 1995 through June 30, 1996, although issues identified in the second half of 1996 and early 1997 are also included where pertinent. The chainnan's cover memorandum to the Report provides a summary of the GMOC's findings and recommendations (please see Attachment A). The workshop will give the GMOC an opportunity to discuss in detail the Report's full findings and recommendations with the Planning Commission and City Council. RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) That the Planning Commission accept the 1996 GMOC Annual Report and recommendations as presented therein, and adopt a motion recommending that the City Council do the same. (2) That Council: (a) Accept the GMOC's 1996 Annual Report and the recommendations contained therein; (b) Direct staff to undertake actions necessary to implement those recommendations as presented in Attachment B - "1996 GMOC Recommendations/Proposed Implementing Actions Summary"; and (c) Authorize the Mayor to finalize and forward to both school districts the draft "Statements of Concern" presented in Attachment C. .:]-) Page 2, Item 3 Meeting Date 4/29/97 BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission is jointly participating in the workshop with Council, and will provide its comments and recommendations at that time. DISCUSSION: Main Conclusions 1 Issues of the 1996 Annual Reoort The GMOC approved their fmal1996 Annual Report and recommendations on April 10, 1997. In summary, the GMOC found the following with respect to Threshold Standard compliance as presented in greater detail in Attachment A: Threshold with Potential for Thresholds Thresholds Non-Comoliance Not in Comoliance In Comoliance Schools Police Library Drainage Fire Sewer Air Quality Traffic Fiscal Water Parks & Rec. Threshold with Potential for Non-Compliance - Issuance of Statements of Concern The situation in the schools is the most crucial area of review this year. Schools- Although the two school districts met the Schools Threshold this year by demonstrating their ability to physically accommodate existing students within their districts, as well as those projected from development forecast through December 1997, the measures necessary to accommodate the students have resulted in many schools operating above capacity. Institution of class size reductions in grades 1-3 has also exacerbated the situation. For example, relocatable classrooms are already in use at several schools in eastern Chula Vista opened during the last few years. The GMOC feels that the resulting conditions have the potential to reduce the quality of education within the two districts. The issuance of a "Statement of Concern" to each of the school districts is recommended, and draft proposed versions are presented in Attachment C. As intended by the Statements, the City Council, community leaders, and the school districts need to work as a team to find both short- and long-tenn solutions to the school capacity problems. The GMOC therefore recommends the fonnation of a Schools Task Force to seek solutions to policy and management issues of mutual interest; first and foremost the capacity situation within both districts. The GMOC further recommends that one of the goals of the task force be to generate support for needed bond measures for school construction and modernization (the school districts are limited by law from lobbying for bond measures). .3-02 "- ---_..._._--~..- _..-.--,~_._.- ..--..-..-----.-.-- Page 3, ltem.3 Meeting Date 4/29/97 Thresholds Not in Compliance With regard to the thresholds not found in full compliance, the following GMOC positions andl or recommendations should be noted: Fire/EMS - As with the Police Department, the Fire Department's threshold shortfall is slight. Still, all means to reduce the response times prior to the full installation of the proposed CAD/RMS system should be examined. The current Fire Station Master Plan Update (FSMPU) provides an excellent opportunity, and the GMOC recommends that pending reviews for several major master planned communities in eastern Chula Vista be closely coordinated with the FSMPU effort. Also proposed as part of the FSMPU, the GMOC sees the need for approval and funding of a FY1997-98 CIP for installation of signal preemption equipment at those major arterial intersections the Fire Department deems most useful. Police - The shortfall of the Police Department relative to its Priority I (emergency) call for service (Pl-CFS) threshold continues to be slight. The Priority II CFS Threshold was again met and exceeded. Even though the shortfall was slight, the GMOC has concern since this is the sixth consecutive year that the Police Department has been very close to compliance for PI-CFS, but has not fully achieved such. The Police Chief reported that a contributing factor to the Department's workload were the approximately 7000 false alarms which the Department responded to last year, many of which originated from the newer communities in eastern Chula Vista. The GMOC recommends that the City Council support the Police Department's efforts to reduce the incidence of false alarms. Thresholds in Compliance With regard to the thresholds found in compliance, the GMOC is also making several recommendations which should be noted: Librarv - The GMOC is again identifying the need for update of the City's 1987 Library Master Plan, to address future library funding, siting and timing issues in eastern Chula Vista. Since that Update is not presently scheduled for completion until Summer 1998, the GMOC recommends that Council direct appropriate staff to ensure that future library siting issues are fully considered as part of the current reevaluation of several major master planned communities in eastern Chula Vista. Drainal!e - Previously recommended drainage monitoring devices to measure the effect of developments in eastern Chula Vista upon older infrastructure in western Chula Vista, have been installed. The GMOC requests that the monitoring results from those devices be included in the Public Works Department's future Drainage Threshold reports to the GMOC. 3--3 ._,~"'._,_..._--. m_'_.u.___ _.______ -~_.- Page 4, Item J Meeting Date 4/29/97 Sewer - There are on-going efforts to ensure the availability of adequate, cost-effective sewage treatment capacity to meet the long-tenn needs for buildout of the City's General Plan Area. These efforts are also strategically related to the future availability of reclaimed water. The GMOC is requesting that Council continue to support and fund efforts to those ends. Water - The GMOC recommends that the City Council continue to support the efforts of the Interagency Water Task Force, particularly toward developing local water supplies, and coordinating with regional sewage treatment planning efforts and the attendant creation of a market for reclaimed water. Parks and Recreation - As noted for a number of years now, the GMOC continues to urge the Council to ensure timely completion and adoption of Parks Master Plan (PMP)(fonnerly known as the Parks Implementation Plan). Per prior Council action on this matter, the PMP is to fonn the basis for establishing solutions to long-standing park deficiencies in western Chula Vista, and correspondingly, for amendment of the Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard to apply City-wide. The GMOC recommends that Council direct staff to complete the PMP no later than October 1997, so that adoption of an amended, City-wide threshold standard can be included as part of the actions on the GMOC's 1997 Annual Report. Air Oualitv - Air quality in Chula Vista and the San Diego region continues to improve. Chula Vista is again in the forefront of efforts to control locally generated air pollution as evidenced by the City's pending adoption of a CO2 Reduction Plan. The GMOC recommends that the City Council carefully review potential implementation proposals to ensure that Chula Vista is not placed at an economic disadvantage. Fiscal- Given the important role of the DIF's in maintaining compliance with Fiscal and other thresholds, and the level of ongoing planning in eastern Chula Vista affecting DIF facility considerations, the GMOC is recommending that the Council ensure adequate staffing and fiscal resources are allocated in appropriate City departments so that the DIF's can be reviewed on a regular, periodic schedule (every 1-2 years), to detennine if updates are necessary. Traffic - This year's traffic recommendations propose several changes to the Arterial Segment Map used in the conduct of the annual Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP). The GMOC supports the requested changes which are intended to recognize traffic patterns in downtown Chula Vista along Third Avenue. The GMOC's 1996 Annual Report, included as Attachment A, contains complete discussions on each threshold topic. To assist the Council in evaluating and acting upon the Report's many recommendations, a concise summary of recommendations and proposed Council implementing actions is presented in Attachment B. Staff requests that Council direct staff to implement those :]-1/ - -.,--.-...-......-.,-...-.-.-..--------- .3 Page 5, Item_ Meeting Date 4/29/97 recommendations through the actions outlined in the right hand column of Attachment B. Appendices to the 1996 Annual Report (see Attachment C) contain the threshold compliance reports presented to the GMOC by City departments and outside agencies. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. As specific follow-up actions are brought forward to the City Council, fiscal analysis of these actions will be provided. Attachments: A. Chairman's cover memo and GMOC 1996 Annual Report. NOT SCANNED I/Ù ~l1f I B. 1996 GMOC RecommendationslProposed Implementing Actions Summary C. Draft proposed "Statements of Concern" to the school districts. D. Appendices to the 1996 Annual Report. NOT S ' CANNED (GMOC-96\CCAGENDA.REP) 3/S -~,_..- - -~- "' . "".u_____..___.,_, __~..___._.__.___ TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: April 10, 1997 TO: ouncil, Chairman and Members of the Planning FROM: h irman, Growth Management Oversight Commission SUBJECT: nagement Oversight Commission (GMOC) Annual Report The GMOC appreciated the timely response from the various City departments, school district's staff, water districts and air pollution control district personnel that enabled us to complete the 1996 report on schedule. Commendations are in order for Duane Bazzel and Ed Batchelder for their support to the Commission. The knowledge, dedication and follow- up that the Commission received from Duane and Ed was outstanding. In addition, Kirk Dakan, Associate Planner provided significant help to the Commission. The GMOC is pleased to report, as depicted below, that nine of the eleven Threshold Standards have been met for the FY 1995-96 review period. The GMOC further finds that the degree of non-compliance with the Police and Fire/EMS Thresholds is not significant, nor has it resulted in any material impacts to delivery of these vital services. The GMOC however, has found areas of concern, most notably, the school systems. Thresholds in Compliance Thresholds Not in Full Compliance Schools Parks & Recreation Fire/EMS Libraries Air Quality Police Drainage Fiscal Sewer Traffic Water SCHOOLS The GMOC wishes to stress the severity of the school capacity situation. Even though the schools threshold was met this year, the exacerbation of school overcrowding concerns the GMOC, and we correspondingly recommend issuance of a Statement-of-Concern to both districts. Despite the valiant efforts of the two districts to respond to changing circumstances, most schools continue to operate above capacity. Some of the new schools in eastern Chula Vista are already at or above capacity and utilizing relocatable classrooms. As described in the accompanying report, the school system is being impacted by a number of converging influences: changing demographics and population growth in western Chula Vista; class size reductions; higher than average student per household ratios in some eastern area communities; and the phasing/timing of school construction among major master planned developments. H-I - -,". ......- -,~-,_..._"..,._-,-,-.-" --- It is the GMOC's viewpoint that present conditions cannot continue without the potential for reducing the quality of education for Chula Vista students. Since resolution of the issues facing the school districts can best occur through the mutual cooperation and assistance of all interested parties, the GMOC is recommending the creation of a schools task force similar to the Interagency Water Task Force. The task force would focus the efforts of the school districts, the City and the private sector to create solutions for maintaining the high quality of education in Chula Vista in the face of growth and demographic changes. The pending review of several major master plans in eastern Chula Vista over the next 12 to 18 months appears to afford an excellent opportunity for such a task force. FIRE/EMS and POLICE The thresholds for Police and Fire/EMS were not met again this year by a very slim margin. The GMOC concluded that the slight non-compliance does not reflect a deterioration in the quality of service. As recommended in past years, a comprehensive re- examination of these two thresholds should occur once sufficient information from the pending Computer Aided Dispatch/Record Management System (CAD/RMS) is available. Initial examination of whether the current FIRE/EMS Threshold is appropriate can, and should, be examined as part of the Fire Station Master Plan Update currently underway. The GMOC commends the Police Department for its pro-active approach to crime prevention, including the use of the Senior Volunteer Patrol. The GMOC also recommends that the City Council support the installation of a Fire Department signal preemption system, especially in the main arterial street corridors. The GMOC again recommends that the Police Department prepare for the future by completing a Police Services Master Plan that includes an analysis of the needs associated with the provision of police services in the expanding eastern area of Chula Vista. The appropriateness of the police service threshold should be examined as a part of that effort. PARKS AND RECREATION The Parks and Recreation Threshold (which calls for a minimum of 3 acres of parkland for every 1000 residents) was met again this year because the Threshold pertains only to areas of the City east of 1-805. The western area's park ratio is 1.19 acres/1000 residents and shrinking due to continued population growth. The combined western and eastern parkland ratio is 2.08 acres to 1,000 residents, which represents only two-thirds of the threshold standard. The GMOC feels there is some urgency for the City to complete planning, and move on to taking actions to reduce the long-standing deficiency in the west, beginning with timely adoption of the Parks Master Plan (PMP). The GMOC requests that the PMP be completed no later than October, 1997, when the next threshold review cycle commences. AIR QUALITY The GMOC commends the City for being a leader in air quality improvement efforts in the San Diego region. The GMOC supports the concept of the proposed CO2 Reduction Plan, but is quick to add that the Council should ensure that its implementation does not place Chula Vista at an economic disadvantage. The GMOC recommends that the City work for regional adoption of such a program, and that the individual elements of the plan be - fJ f) -"'" implemented in Chula Vista as they become economically feasible. FISCAL The brevity of the Fiscal section in this year's Annual Report does not imply that the Development Impact Fee (DIF) program is unimportant, but instead is a reflection that the DIF system is working well. The GMOC recognizes the extreme importance of the DIF program to the maintenance of the City's quality of life, and stresses the need for the City to continue to allocate sufficient resources to ensure a regular, periodic review and update of the various DIF's, including preparation and usage of a consistent 5-year growth forecast. (GMCOVLET.MEM) !r g - -~..~_._-----_._..._,.,-,.__.__.__._---- CITY OF CHULA VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 1996 REPORT (Threshold Standard Review Period 7/1/95 to 6/30/96) SUBMITTED APRIL 1997 1f-1- --.,...- .._.._-.._--~,--_.._._..-----_.,--_.._-_.- CITY OF CHULA VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION 1996 REPORT Commission Members Tris Hubbard, Chairman (Education) James Kell, Vice Chairman (Eastern Territories) Will T. Hyde (Environmental) Chuck Peter (Business) John Willett (Planning Commission) Loren Tarantino (Center City) Elizabeth Allen (Montgomery) C. Lynn Dull (Sweetwater) Kevin O'Neill (Development) Staff Edgar Batchelder, Senior Planner Kirk Dakan, Associate Planner Linda Bond, Administrative Office Specialist Maureen Casper, Administrative Office Specialist III April 1997 /ì-(' --~..__. . ---....--..-.--.--.-- TABLE OF CONTENTS TODic Paee Introduction. .... . . ..... . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Review Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Development Forecasts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1996 Thresholdl Annual Review Summary . . . . .. . . . . . . 4 1996 Annual Review of Thresholds- GMOC Findings and Recommendations Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 FirelEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Police . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Libraries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Drainage ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Parks and Recreation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Fiscal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Review of Potential Higher and Adult Education Threshold . 19 LIST OF APPENDICES ADDendix A. Chula Vista Elementary School Memorandum B. Sweetwater Union High School District Memorandum C. Fire Department Memorandum D. Police Department Memorandum E. Library Memorandum F. Engineering Drainage and Sewerage Report G. Otay Valley Water District Communication H. Sweetwater Water District Communication I. Parks and Recreation Department Memorandum J. Air Pollution Control District Communication K. Environmental Resource Manager's Communication L. Draft Revised Air Quality Threshold Standard M. Finance Department Memorandum N. Engineering Traffic Reports and Memoranda O. Development Forecast Infonnation fJ- b ~~.'_M·__ --...--- . __,_~.,._.__. ..m.. ~..._._. .__u INTRODUCTION In November 1987, the City Council adopted the Threshold/Standards Policy for Chula Vista. The policy addresses eleven public facilities and services, and each is discussed in terms of a goal, objective(s), a "threshold" or standard, and implementation measures. Adherence to these Citywide standards is intended to preserve and enhance both the environment and residents' quality-of-life as growth occurs. To provide an independent, annual City-wide Threshold/Standards compliance review, the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) was created. It is composed of nine members representing a geographical balance of residents, as well as a cross section of interests including education, environment, business, development and the City Planning Commission. The GMOC's review is structured around a fiscal year cycle to accommodate City Council review of GMOC recommendations which may have budget implications. The official review period for this report is July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996, although pertinent issues identified during the second half of 1996 and early 1997 are also addressed as necessary. REVIEW PROCESS The GMOC held a series of 11 meetings from November 1996 through April 1997. Threshold reports submitted and orally presented by both individual City departments and external agencies, were reviewed to determine compliance for the pertinent thresholds. The GMOC also reviewed whether or not it was appropriate to issue a "statement of concern" or to make other recommendations regarding each threshold. Following completion of the individual threshold reviews, the GMOC prepared this annual report for presentation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Hil!her and Adult Education Threshold Subcommittee In addition to the regular GMOC meetings, select members of the GMOC along with representatives from Southwestern Community College, Sweetwater Union High School District and the Chula Vista Adult School, held several meetings during the above review period to discuss possible development of a "Higher and Adult Education" Threshold Standard. Such a standard would expand beyond the scope of the current "Schools" Threshold which address mandatory primary and secondary education, and was requested to be looked at as part of the City Council's actions on the GMOC's 1995 Annual Report. A synopsis of the subcommittees efforts are presented on page 18 of this report. DEVELOPMENT FORECASTS The Threshold/Standards Policy calls for the City to prepare both short-range (12 to 18 month) and mid-range (5 to 7 years) development forecasts at the beginning of the annual GMOC review process. Complimentary to threshold performance evaluation, which reviews the prior year period, these forecasts serve to provide a common basis by which the GMOC, staff and external GMOC 1996 Annual Report 1 (4/1 0/97) f)-- 1 _,_...__nU ..-.-.-.--.."..-""-.--.,."..-.-.--". agencies can identify and address any potential threshold issues before a problem arises. A copy of this year's forecast information is included as Appendix 0 and is summarized below. 12-18 Month Forecast The 12-18 month forecast is the main set of development projections upon which the annual threshold reviews are based. This forecast focuses on near-term development which will place demands on available infrastructure and services, and presents information at the project-specific level. The forecast is derived from a survey of local developers and builders as to their anticipations, and from a review of development under processing by the City including design review, subdivision maps, plan checks and building permits. By experience, the 12-18 month forecast based on developer inputs is an aggressive, or worst case, scenario. For example, building permit activity over the last three years has averaged about 800 new dwelling unit completions per year, compared to the annual average of approximately 1250 units reflected in the current forecast. Such a worst case scenario, however, is beneficial for growth management purposes in that it represents a maximum potential impact to facilities and services. Two tables are used in Appendix 0 to present the forecast figures; one for the Otay Water District area which encompasses new development east of the 1-805 freeway, and one for the Sweetwater Authority area which encompasses mostly inf¡ l development in older areas of the City west of 1-805. The figures cover the 18-month period from July 1996 through December 1997. As indicated in these tables, during this period approximately 2204 housing units are anticipated to be authorized for construction, and 1835 housing units are anticipated to reach occupancy within the Otay Water District area. For the Sweetwater Authority service area, the 18-month projections are for 122 housing units to be authorized for construction, and 50 units to reach occupancy. This equates to a City-wide annual average of 1551 housing unit authorizations, and 1256 housing unit occupancies for the forecast period. 5-7 Year Forecast The mid-range (5-7 year) forecast is more general, and presents information on a City-wide basis. It is intended to provide sufficient foresight to identify potential growth management issues before they become a problem. The City used SANDAG's Series 8 Interim Forecast to produce figures for the seven-year period from 1996-2003 time frame. Given the lingering uncertainty in building activity stemming from the recession, the forecast employs low- and high- end figures. The low end provides a basis for conservative side revenue and fiscal considerations, and the high-end for maximum potential facility and service impacts. As indicated in the table in Appendix 0, the low-end forecast projects an annual average of 967 dwelling units completions, while the high-end indicates 1187 units per year. While these two averages appear somewhat close to each other, much greater differences can be seen in the year- to-year figures. The figures take into consideration development in the first phases of Otay Ranch which is anticipated to commence construction in late 1997. GM OC 1996 Annual Report 2 (411 0/97) /ì,g While a majority of the forecast is attributable to growth in eastern Chula Vista, the above figures include approximately 100 dwelling units per year of infill development in western Chula Vista (Sweetwater Authority area), based primarily on an analysis of historic trends. Non-Residential DeveloDment Although not intended as a forecast, the last table in Appendix 0 provides a listing of non- residential development projects which were at the various stages of processing indicated as of July 1996. GMOC 1996 Annual Report 3 (4/10/97) Iì - '1' -._-~-_...".---_.._---------..----.----. --- . 0 ~ø.:;;: ::::::::B~: - 1ftt.b " fifi'1f ~ ... . ~:N: . ;:;: .~ c ~l:3:r?-,:=é:;: t: .! :>:0.<= *i[1:::: ,,- 'Itw ... Q, i1'I; -= e ~ ;::.'. c 0 b:::t.:I::=> ~~ @~-:::. i :tii: þ~~: - t ¡:::. . ~~. Q,.~ ~I:m~ 0..0 f@" ~~ -= ... . ., < ~i.L::::::> c ... " ... =.!:! ..... 0..0 ... U·- c ... ~ " o 8.~ ë~:;:. "~ Q, !j 0 ~ - - >< .5 ::! '" ~ ~ t- '" - * s: - '" , " ~ ~ -; = CJ ::: 0 ; ~\O 5z= - ... Q, ~~ ~~§ ~s¡ u ~~ :: ..0 , - ",,,, ~~ ~~ ...~ '" ~ Q " ,.;¡ .- o t - =~ " '" ::?1 v i õ z -= 'õ \0 ..0 '" ~ '" .... ..0 d ... .9 1;j Iii "E- " " þ - ~ c 'C ..a - e 0 ... ~ 0 °C 0 " ~ ..0 - t- Oo ~ - .ia , ~ = "" " ... < Q = ~ -;;; 0 " - " ... :;p [:j ~ 10 ... " ~ " ;> " - c ~ - " 00 c " ~ < '" " - ~ ¿ '" " ¡j ;; " 1! .9 "" .... ~ .... ~ '" ..0 '" " È tJ '" U '" ~ Õ -= " - ~ ~ " '" c .. ~ ;,; .. " ... ~ u g " °C " ... ¡; = B E õ 0 - o~ E c " " ~ r::I 0 ::< " .;¡ ~ - " ..0 ... 'õ ..0 ~ ... ... '" ... ..0 t:) ... r<; ;:¡ ... " ~ :;;: r<; ... ... '" ~ Q '" '" " ..; ..; .,; ò ....; " ....; ... ,,¡ '<:Ï ...: oé '" .... .... * ft-Ib - 1996 ANNUAL REVIEW OF THRESHOLDS - GMOC FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS SCHOOLS The GMOC fmds that both the Chula Vista Elementary School and Sweetwater Union High School Districts are in compliance with the Schools Threshold Standard based on their expressed ability to accommodate projected student enrollment growth resulting from the City's 12-18 month development forecast. The GMOC further fmds that a majority of both districts' school facilities are severely impacted, and that a number of the techniques utilized by the districts to manage the impacts (resulting from both new enrollment growth and class size reduction) is a less-than-desirable situation which has the potential to compromise the quality of education for students. Listed below are summaries of the conditions at the two school districts as reported to the GMOC, followed by a list of recommendations to help correct the identified problems. The GMOC knows that the school districts are fully aware of the situation within their educational systems. The following discussions and recommendations should not be perceived as a criticism of the districts or as an attempt by the GMOC or the City to tell the districts how to run their organizations. Rather, the recommendations are intended to foster partnership with the districts on these issues in the hope of reaching solutions. The Sweetwater Union High School District (SUHSD) reported that: 1. Four of the five High Schools in Chula Vista are operating above capacity. Only the newer Eastlake High School has remaining capacity. 2. One of the three middle schools is above capacity. The SUHSD report concluded its near-tenn projections by saying that the new growth in Chula Vista is impacting the secondary school system, but that the impact is manageable through the use of busing, relocatable classrooms, and the conversion of other rooms to classroom use. Since it takes at least five years to plan and construct a new high school, the capacity issues must be examined at an early stage using at least a three to five year development forecast. To help prevent future capacity problems in the eastern areas, the City needs to work hand-in-hand with the SUHSD to ensure that any potential, interrelated future phasingltiming issues among the eastern area master plans are identified and addressed through conditions of approval on new development. There is an excellent opportunity to do that because of the large number of eastern area master plans to be reviewed over the next 12-18 months (Eastlake, Sunbow, Otay Ranch and San Miguel Ranch). GMOC 1996 Annual Report 5 (4/1 0/97) if- f/ --'-"'-'- .~-_._-_.,.__.... The Chula Vista Elementary School District (CVESD) reported that: . l. The elementary schools are operating at or above capacity. 2. Sixty-five additional teaching stations have been accommodated through relocatable classrooms this year (mostly for class size reductions, but some were for new growth). 3. Auxiliary teaching rooms (computer labs, resource rooms, libraries) have been reduced or eliminated to create additional classroom space. 4. There has been a reduction in the physical size of the classrooms by partitioning classrooms, where possible, with moveable walls to reduce floor space from 900 square feet to 600 square feet (minimum 30 square feet per student). 5. There has been a doubling up of classes (40 students total) into those oversized rooms that can not be partitioned. 6. Some of the rooms being converted for classrooms were not designed for classroom purposes and therefore these new "classrooms": a. Have no windows that face directly outdoors. b. Have no direct access to the outdoors, thus requiring children to enter and exit these rooms through other classrooms. These are rooms in the newest five schools. 7. One school (Mueller) is on a multi-track year-round schedule, one additional school is planned to be multi-track in the fall. Some schools are on year round single-track and one other school is on a split session schedule. In many instances, these special schedules directly impede the District's ability to better balance enrollment by shifting students from one school to another. The above described situation in the elementary school system has been created by a combination of the following factors: l. Class size reductions in grades 1-3 . 2. A continuing increase in the overall number of students, caused by: a. In some of the neighborhoods in the west, older households with no (or grown) children are moving out and are being replaced by younger households with school-age children. In some instances, children are being overflow bused to elementary schools which are already experiencing their own challenges in housing students from new developments. GMOC 1996 Annual Report 6 (4/10/97) 1t-(lJ..- . b. New growth, including higher than expected student/household ratios in some of the new developments in the east. The average in these areas is about .35 elementary school children per housing unit, as compared to the district-wide average of .30 originally used in calculating school needs for these developments. Such changes in the student per household ratio should be considered in the planning of future schools in eastern Chula Vista. This small difference in the ratios represents a 17 % increase in enrollment 3. The lag time between the occupancy of households in new subdivisions in the east and the construction of schools. Generally speaking, schools are not constructed until one half of the children to attend the school are there. It takes about 1000 housing units to generate half the enrollment (300 students) for an elementary school. Until the home school is built, these students must be housed at other school sites. 4. A shift in the expected phasinglcompletions of some of the new major developments in the east, resulting in the delay of school construction in those developments which were intended to also serve adjacent projects which were not delayed. This exacerbates the situation in 3. above, and results in additional interim housing conditions that have contributed to overcrowding in certain schools. To a certain extent, the school situation can be divided into two geographic areas: 1. The urbanized western neighborhoods which are experiencing demographic changes resulting in increasing student populations absent any significant new residential construction. There are few parcels remaining that are large enough to accommodate more schools, and such land is very expensive when available. There are limited financing mechanisms for schools in these older neighborhoods. This area is almost entirely dependent on state derived revenues, or possible bond issues for the construction of new school facilities. 2. The urbanizing eastern Dlanned communities which will eventually have enough money to construct schools because of development agreements and Mello-Roos district financing, but there is often a lag time between the children moving into the neighborhood and the opening of the neighborhood school. As noted above, changes in anticipated phasing among developments stemming from economic conditions can exacerbate this situation. The problems can not, however, be entirely reduced into east and west scenarios because what happens in one part of the District will inevitably have repercussions in other parts of the District. The GMOC is concerned that these current conditions have the potential to reduce the quality of education for some of the students in the two districts. A reduction in the quality of education (in GMOC 1996 Annual Report 7 (4/10/97) fì-r .8 ---.-.-----. many cases driven by the need to physically accommodate enrollment), goes directly to the educational "quality-of-life" at which the City's Threshold Standard is aimed. A perception (and in some cases a reality) that an area's schools are overcrowded, and that children will not be able to attend the neighborhood school, can alter the perception of a neighborhood or community's overall quality-of-life. The school overcrowding issue is effectively a citywide issue, deserving of the City's interest and involvement. Given the nature of the factors influencing enrollment growth and overcrowding, the GMOC sees the issues falling into two main groups; (1) those associated with broader policy and management considerations such as varying school calendars, class size reduction, and financing of facility expansions and modernization upgrades, and (2) those associated with collective new development phasing and timing considerations in eastern Chula Vista relative to the location and construction of planned schools. As a result, the GMOC recommends: . That the City Council, in cooperation with the two school district boards, form a task force to look for solutions to both the SUHS and CVES districts' capacity problems, and to address other policy and management issues of mutual interest to the City and the districts on an on-going basis. One initial topic for the task force could be the development of a campaign to educate the public about the need for passage of a school facilities construction and modernization bond measure. . That the City Council direct appropriate City staff to form a working/technical committee with the districts' planning staff to comprehensively examine phasing schedules in the context of reviewing a number of the major developments in eastern Chula Vista over the next year. Their fundamental charge should be to address the interdependent relationships of the projects relative to coordinating the timing for school construction to reduce the extent of interim housing and overcrowding. FIRE/EMS The GMOC fmds that the City is not in full compliance with the Fire/EMS Threshold Standard. The GMOC recognizes that this apparent non-compliance is attributable to changes in the manner of data collection, and not a reduction in fIre service levels for FY 1995-96. The GMOC, however, still expresses concern since this is the fourth consecutive year in which the current system of measurement does not afford a direct evaluation consistent with the structure of the present Fire/EMS Threshold. As the GMOC understands, since tools do not exist for an adequate evaluation consistent with the present standard, purchase and installation of the full Computer-Aided Dispatch/Records Management System (CAD/RMS) is necessary. The CAD/RMS will enable the Fire Department to properly evaluate its response time performance toward correcting present statistical GMOC 1996 Annual Report 8 (4/10/97) f)-If- inconsistencies, providing a true and accurate measurement of compliance with the present standard, and to determine whether any changes to the Threshold Standard are needed. The GMOC is pleased that the purchase of a CAD/RMS system is now funded as a part of the current budget but understands that there is still some uncertainty as to which system is to be purchased. This Commission further understands that the installation of such a computer system will take more than 12 months. After a CAD/RMS system is installed, it will likely take a year to obtain a useful database, and it will take another year beyond that to obtain the first year-to- year comparisons on the new system. While the City awaits the benefits of comparative data from a new CAD/RMS system, all ways to reduce the travel portion of the overall response time need to be examined. The Fire Chief stated that he is working with the Public Works Department on the installation and operation of a signal preemption system. Presently, there are insufficient funds to create a City-wide system, but certain key intersections or corridors could be equipped. Therefore, the GMOC recommends: . That Council ensure the provision of adequate staff and funding for the Fire Department's completion of the Fire Station Master Plan Update by Summer 1997, and direct that the Update also include the following: 1) Identification of which intersections andlor corridors would best serve the Fire Department if they were equipped with a signal preemption system, and; 2) A CIP for installation and activation of a signal preemption system on the identified streets and intersections. Several eastern Chula Vista master planned communities currently in the planning stages will have a significant impact on demand for FirelEMS services. During the planning process for those communities (Eastlake, Otay Ranch, San Miguel Ranch and Sunbow) FirelEMS Threshold-related planning matters need to be sufficiently addressed, and appropriate conditions established through the Public Facility Financing Plans (PFFP's). These considerations will be occurring at the same time the Fire Station Master Plan is being updated. To ensure that those matters are adequately addressed and coordinated with the Fire Station Master Plan Update, the GMOC recommends: . That the City Council direct the Fire Department, in cooperation with the Planning Department, to ensure that any changes in land use and circulation being proposed through the master plan reviews are consistent with the Fire Station Master Plan Update. GM OC 1996 Annual Report 9 (4/1 0/97) /" l)-rJ - ---.-~_.""..~... _.----------"~.'~--- POLICE The GMOC fmds that the City is not in compliance with the Police Threshold for Priority I CFS (calls for service). Although the shortfall was again slight, the GMOC expresses concern since this is the sixth consecutive year in which the PI-CFS standard has not been met, despite a 3.8% decrease in CFS volume over last year and an overall increase in patrol staffmg. Standards for Priority II CFS were again met and surpassed. The GMOC is concerned over the continued PI CFS deficiency despite continued increases in patrol staffmg, and the overall reduction in CFS volume. The GMOC is concerned about the high incidence of false alanns generated by the thousands of burglarlemergency alann systems installed in Chula Vista by a number of different companies. During presentation to the GMOC, the Police Chief stressed the impact that the incidence of false alanns has on his Department's workload. He indicated that there were more than 7000 false alarms in the last year. Given the magnitude of this problem and its negative City-wide affects on overall CFS volume, the GMOC believes that the issue needs to be resolved. Therefore the GMOC recommends: . That the City Council and the Police Department continue to pursue a course of action for dealing with false alarms. The Police Department should present the action plan to the City Council by October, 1997 so that it is available when the GMOC commences its next review cycle. The Police Department has been implementing a variety of operational and managerial changes. Many of those changes are designed to improve call-for-service (CFS) response perfonnance, and intended to address non-confonnance with the Police Threshold Standard. Despite commendable efforts on the part of the Department to effect community based policing, and other significant managerial and deployment tactics, the Police Department continues to be slightly out of compliance with the PI-CFS Standards as evidenced by the following statistics: Priority I Calls for Service (PI CFS)- Response Time Reported Period Call Volume wlin 7 minutes Av. ResD. Time Threshold 84.0% 4:30 FY1993-94 3184 85.4 % 4:35 FY1994-95 2453 84.9% 4:37 FY1995-96 1915 83.0% 4:46 GMOC 1996 Annual Report 10 (4/10/97) A-I ¿, Priority II Calls for Service (PII CFS)- Response Time Reported Period Call Volume w/in 7 minutes Av. ResD. Time Threshold 62% 7:00 FY1993-94 20,580 63.5% 6:48 FY1994-95 21,900 63.4% 6:39 FY1995-96 21,743 64.5% 6:38 While the GMOC considers the PI CFS shortfall to be a modest deficiency, the GMOC none-the- less remains concerned since this is the sixth consecutive year in which Police perfonnance has been very near, but below, the minimum acceptable standard. Based on oral presentations, the GMOC believes extension of police services into the expansive eastern area of the city may actually be having a negative impact on the ability to meet Priority I threshold response times. This is mainly attributable to topography (canyons, etc.), the resulting winding, loop roads and cul-de-sac streets, and the fact that several of the major north/south connections to the eastlwest arterial street system are not in place. The Police Department continues to indicate that present dispatch and record keeping systems do not enable data management in a fashion which can readily quantify whether increases in CFS are growth related. Since adequate tools do not exist to conduct an evaluation of these eastern Chula Vista conditions, and their actual affect to response times, purchase and installation of the full CAD/RMS (also to be used by the Fire Department) is crucial to evaluating police efficiency. The GMOC therefore recommends: . That the City Council aggressively support the timely purchase, installation and operation of the proposed CAD/RMS. The GMOC would like to stress the need to expedite vendor selection, and the purchase and installation of the CAD/RMS during FY1997/98. The GMOC has been faced with the PI-CFS non-compliance for six years already, and at least one year of CAD/RMS statistics will be needed to enable the GMOC's review. Therefore, if the CAD/RMS is not in place promptly, there may be several more years of non-compliance before the GMOC has enough infonnation to adequately address the issue. As noted last year, when better data is available through the CAD/RMS, re-evaluation of the threshold standard is warranted. In order to produce worthwhile indicators and/or measurable results for use in the reevaluation, it is anticipated that at least one year of CAD/RMS statistics will be necessary to detennine if current issues influencing police perfonnance can be solved through managerial techniques, or if an alteration of the current Standard is warranted. The GMOC recognizes the Police Department for its pro-active efforts in crime prevention, including the use of the Senior Volunteer Patrol. GMOC 1996 Annual Report 11 (4/10/97) fI-f'7 ..~.__.._.__.. .. -_.,- _.~-_._---~._-- The GMOC is aware that the Civic Center Master Plan (CCMP) serves as the current master plan for police facilities through its proposal that the existing police station at the Civic Center remain as the City's single police facility. The GMOC concurs that there is a need to revisit the Police component of the CCMP, given the significant changes in land use, including the comprehensive General Plan Update in 1989, and adoption of the Otay Ranch Plan, which have occurred since the CCMP was adopted in 1988. The GMOC believes some urgency to commence an effort since ongoing development planning and approvals in eastern Chula Vista are effecting the physical and social environment in which the services will ultimately be delivered. As noted earlier, one example is the layout and street configurations in eastern Chula Vista which are having an affect on response times. In order to ensure that eastern area master planning addresses issues with respect to extending police services and facilities to a growing and geographically expanding city, the GMOC recommends: . That the City Council direct staff of appropriate City Departments, and allocate the necessary resources and budget in FY1997-98, to commence preparation of a long-range master plan for the future delivery of police services to the expanding eastern area of the City consistent with threshold standards. This plan should address expansions andlor changes in the level and methods of deployment, as well as any needed or desirable physical facility expansions andlor relocations. LmRARIES The GMOC fmds that the City continues to be in compliance with the Library Threshold, and will remain so at least through the year 2000 based on current growth and population projections. The GMOC again commends the Library Department for its continued and diligent forward planning efforts including the pending update of the Library Master Plan Update scheduled for completion in FYI997-98. That schedule is intended to meet the deadline of the present EastLake site option (which the City must exercise, or not, by August 1998). Additionally, the current land planning re-evaluations for future phases of EastLake (Trails, Eastlake III and the Land Swap area) are anticipated for processing during 1997 and early 1998. To ensure that alternate library site options are not precluded in relation to the timing for the fonnal Library Master Plan Update, the GMOC recommends: . That the City Council ensure appropriate staff and fiscal resources are approved in the Library Department's FY 1997/98 budget for completion of the Library Master Plan Update. The completion and adoption of the Update by August 1998, is critical in relation to determining permanent site selection with regard to the City's present site option within the Eastiake project area. The Master Plan Update is also viewed as important to addressing library needs for the eastern territories area, and to updating library facility costs as part of the larger Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (pFDIF) update. GMOC 1996 Annual Report 12 (4/10/97) II-It -----.--.--.------- ~---~.-.._-_..- - ----_.. -.-. ~- · That the City Council direct Planning Department staff to ensure that interim and permanent library siting issues are fully considered and coordinated with the Library Department during the course of the pending EastLake Master Plan re-evaluation effort. Although more time is needed for technology to evolve before considering any potential revisions to the Threshold Standard, the GMOC again requests that Council continue to recognize the need for reconsideration of the threshold standard at an appropriate future date. In this regard, the GMOC would like to note that integration of computers into the libraries has raised issues regarding both adequate floor space needs to accommodate them, as well as changes in the level and training of staff necessary to provide technological assistance to patrons. The pending Library Master Plan Update provides an excellent opportunity to evaluate and report on these considerations which the GMOC sees as being directly related to the ".. . adequately equipped and staffed.." portion of the Library Threshold Standard. Therefore, the GMOC recommends: · That the City Council direct Library staff to ensure that these potential floor area and staffmg related threshold issues stemming from the integration of computers, are evaluated and reported upon as part of the Library Master Plan Update effort. Considering the EastLake High School library joint use venture, the GMOC sees the potential for expansion of such ventures to other secondary school sites, and therefore further recommends: · That the City Council direct the Library staff to include an initial evaluation of the feasibility and desirability of expanding such ventures to other secondary school sites as a component of the pending Library Master Plan Update. DRAINAGE The GMOC fmds that the City is in compliance with the Drainage Threshold on both a project and cumulative basis. Last year, the GMOC noted the lack of quantifiable data on drainage flows from eastern Chula Vista into the older facilities to the west, and therefore recommended that monitoring stations be constructed at the Telegraph and Poggi Canyon drainage courses. The GMOC recognizes the Engineering Division for its responsiveness in proposing the installation of two stations as part of the upcoming CIP. The GMOC looks forward to seeing the data from those monitoring stations and therefore, the GMOC recommends: · That the Engineering Division include a summary of data derived from the monitoring stations as part of its future Drainage Threshold reports to the GMOC, beginning with the 1997 report. GMOC 1996 Annual Report 13 (4/10/97) If -/1 . ......,.".--- -.".- . As was noted in last year's report, there remains $23 million of unfunded drainage improvements that need to be made in western Chula Vista over the next 20 years (this would require $1,695,000 per year for 20 years). The GMOC is aware that sources of funding for drainage projects are limited, and may be further impacted by the passage of Proposition 218. Therefore, the GMOC requests; . That the Engineering Division include information as to Proposition 218's impacts on construction of these needed drainage improvements in western Chula Vista as part of its 1997 Threshold report to the GMOC. SEWERS The GMOC fmds that the City is in compliance with the Sewer Threshold Standard on both project and cumulative basis. The report and presentation by the Engineering Division demonstrated that Chula Vista has adequate short term and long term sewerage treatment capacity through at least the year 2010. The challenge for the future is to make sure that there is adequate capacity to support full build-out of the City's present General Plan which is presently projected for the year 2030 or beyond. Related challenges are for keeping costs down through reclamation which will be largely dependent upon creating markets for reclaimed water. Therefore, the GMOC again recommends: . That Council support staff and consultive efforts to expeditiously develop a strategic plan which ensures future sewage treatment capacity sufficient to meet the long-range, buildout needs of the City's adopted General Plan. WATER The GMOC finds that both the Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District are in compliance with the Water Threshold Standard and have sufficient water supply and availability to meet the needs of local growth over the next 12 to 18 months. The presentation of the Otay Water District again emphasized the ever increasing role that reclaimed water will play in the total regional water supply. Awareness and involvement are necessary for building a market for reclaimed water, the economics of which will have a direct and fundamental bearing on whether significant future use of reclaimed water becomes a meaningful reality or not. Therefore the GMOC recommends: . That the City Council continue to support the Interagency Water Task Force's efforts to establish a reclaimed water market at the local level, and its coordinative actions which will ensure proper integration and timing between reclaimed water availability and demand, such that reclaimed water usage will become a reality on a meaningful scale. GMOC 1996 Annual Report 14 (4/10/97) f1-J...o -- ---- ---- - -- .-..--.- ~-~-- --- -",---- ----- --- --- -...--..------- -- - PARKS AND RECREATION The GMOC finds that the eastern portion of the City meets and exceeds the parkland threshold and is adequately served, and therefore the City is in compliance with the present Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard which applies only in eastern Chula Vista. The older western sections of the City continue to be severely deficient with regard to the three acre per 1000 population standard. Per the Park and Recreation Department's report, as of June 30, 1996, the eastern area was at 4.24 acresl 1000 , and the western area was at 1.19 acres/1000. The combined City-wide ratio is 2.08 acres of parkland per 1000 population. The Park Master Plan (PMP), currently in the preparation stages, would help the GMOC to know how the park system in the western area of Chula Vista wiII be expanded to bring that area into closer conformance with the threshold. The GMOC's expectation for the last four review periods was that the PMP would be completed. Since the PMP has yet to be completed, much to the dismay of the Commission, the GMOC recommends: . That the City Council direct the appropriate Departments and staff to ensure that the Parks Master Plan is completed no later than October 1997 , so that it will be available when this Commission commences its next review cycle. The GMOC realizes that the park deficiency in the older western areas is the result of the development history in those areas, which naturally predated any parkland standard, and by the annexation of the park deficient Montgomery area. The planned communities of the eastern portion of the City continue to be adequately served by parks. Because of the dramaticaIIy different circumstances between the eastern and western portions of the City, it is inappropriate to hold them to the same parkIands standard, therefore, the GMOC again recommends: . That the City Council direct the staff to finalize the revised draft Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard amendment originally endorsed by Council in 1994, and presented in Appendix I, and return it for formal public hearing adoption with the Park Master Plan. AIR OUALITY The GMOC fmds that the City meets the revised Air Quality Threshold (April 25, 1996) in that the City's regulations are consistent with Federal, State and Regional air quality regulations and the City is implementing programs which will further reduce air pollution emissions. The Air PoIIution Control District reported that the air quality in the San Diego region continues to improve. The air in Chula Vista exceeded State poIIution standards only once in 1996 and had GMOC 1996 Annual Report 15 (4/10/97) H- 1--( ----" ---- . ---..-.--..." ._--------"--_._~.- --.....---.-- - --..- , no days in violation of Federal standards. To further the progress in air quality. the City has continued to implement air pollution reduction programs. Additionally, various City departments are working on a CO2 reduction program which will be presented to the City Council this year. , ~.III.~~!IIII lIt 'Iilll ¡ illllll!!llllillll!¡!IIIIII;II Sm Di'go "'gioo I 39 I 14 I 12 I 2 I Chula Vista 3 1 0 0 The GMOC is pleased with the contribution that the City is making to the regional air quality program and feels that the City has not received sufficient credit andlor publicity for its efforts, therefore the GMOC recommends: . That the City promote public awareness of its innovative air pollution control programs and emphasize the need for a regional effort on the part of all Cities and the County to work together on this regional problem. . That the City Council continue to pursue air pollution reduction measures, and in particular to adopt the CO2 Reduction Plan. The GMOC notes that care must be exercised in the implementation of the CO2 Reduction Plan to ensure that Chula Vista is not placed at an economic disadvantage. The CO2 reduction measures should be implemented when they become economically feasible. FISCAL The GMOC finds that the City is again in compliance with the Fiscal Threshold on both project and cumulative bases. The City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) program continues to produce sufficient revenues to fund current, related facilities and services in the eastern territories. Development Impact Fees (DIP's) are essential to fmancing public improvements associated with growth so the importance of updating the fee schedule as necessary can not be over-emphasized. Even a temporary shortfall could substantially reduce the city's ability to construct needed GMOC 1996 Annual Report 16 (4/10/97) Iì-d-~ facilities. A standard periodic update of the fees is therefore necessary to protect the current level of fInancing and protect against any shortfalls, regardless of how temporary they might be. Given the understanding that some of the DIF's have not been recently updated, the GMOC therefore recommends: . That the City Council ensure that adequate staff"mg and resources are provided to conduct reviews and necessary updates of the DIF's every one to two years, and perhaps adopt a schedule for such, to ensure the accuracy of projections, facility costs and other assumptions. This would include a requirement for the inclusion of standard, five-year growth projections in each of the DIF updates. TRAFFIC The GMOC finds that the City is in compliance with the Traffic Threshold Standard on both a project and cumulative basis, based on the presented results of the City's 1996 Traffic Monitoring Program. Those results indicate that all arterial street segments studied operate at LOS 'c' or better, and that there were no arterial interchange segments found to be operating at LOS 'D' for more than the two hour maximum set by the threshold standard. The 1996 Traffic Monitoring Program (IMP) evaluated arterial segments from last year's (1995) program which were operating at LOS C or less, as well as any other arterial segments where traffic volumes have increased 10% or more since the segment was last studied by a previous TMP report. Additional segments were studied where new traffic signals have been built which significantly affect the operational characteristics of the roadway. The 'H' Street/East 'H' Street corridor from 1-5 to Rutgers Ave. was also studied per prior GMOC requests. Although this approach to the IMP varies slightly from that originally proposed when the City switched to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) measurement method in 1991, the GMOC concurs with the present methodology which is also proposed for use in conducting the 1997 TMP. In summary, that methodology focuses only on those arterial street segments identified as operating at LOS 'C' or less by the prior year's IMP, and those segments which have seen a 10% or more increase in volume, or have had alterations which significantly change the street's operational characteristics. Because the TMP effort is labor intensive, this approach will focus available resources where they have the most value. Ihe GMOC therefore recommends: . That the Public Works Department, Engineering Division, Traffic Section continue to conduct the annual TMP using the methodology presented with 1996 TMP. GMOC 1996 Annual Report 17 (4/10/97) H-~·3 "_e_·"·"__ ----.--.-....-------- In addition to the fmdings of the 1996 TMP Report, the GMOC was also presented with several requests from the Public Works Department, Engineering Division, for modification to the arterial street system segments evaluated for threshold perfonnance by the TMP. Two segments were requested for deletion from TMP monitoring, and a remainder segment resulting from these deletions be combined with another existing segment. The Engineering Division cited the following reasons for the requested modifications: Delete Third Ave from C to E Streets- has an average daily trip (ADT) volume of less than 10,000 (7240 ADT). The Traffic Threshold Standard indicates that only those arterials with 10,000 ADT or more are included in threshold measurements. The surrounding area is largely built-out, and significant future increases in ADT are not anticipated. Delete Third Avenue from E to G Streets- does not have the typical characteristics of an arterial street, because: 1. It is in the downtown business district. 2. The speed limit is 25 miles per hour. 3. A portion contains angled parking and one lane of traffic (between E and F Streets). 4. It contains wide sidewalks and planters which narrow approaches to intersections. Combine Third Ave. from G to H Streets with the existilll! selmlent between H Street and Nanles Street- with the above deletion of Third Ave. from E to G Streets, the remaining portion of the present segment from G Street to H Street is too short to remain as its own segment. Given that the existing segment of Third Ave. from H Street to Naples St. has the same characteristics and 35 MPH speed limit, the two are proposed for combination. The GMOC agrees with the rationale for the modifications presented above, and therefore recommends: . That Council approve in concept the following proposed amendments to the conduct of the annual Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP), and to the "Arterial Segment Map" which defines the streets to be monitored, and direct that the Public Works Department, Engineering Division, return the matters to Council as necessary to formally adopt the amendments: . Remove the segments of Third A venue between C and G Streets from the Arterial Segment Map and exempt from evaluation under the TMP. GMOC 1996 Annual Report 18 (4/10/97) ß-rJtf - ---- -- - .-.------- -. -- - ----_.~.. .-.---- ._.____ - - __._ __u___..__ ________ u ___ ___u_ n____ ___ ._ . Modify the Arterial Segment Map to combine the remaining portion of the Third Ave. segment between G and H Streets with the existing segment between H and Naples Streets. One other TMP related change that should be noted involved the reclassification of the arterial interchange segment at 1-805 and Otay Valley Rd. from a Class I to a Class II segment. This is the result of the installation of new traffic signals in the area as outlined on page 5 of the cover memorandum transmitting the 1996 TMP Report (please see Appendix N). The GMOC is also pleased to note the responsiveness of the Engineering Division in addressing prior traffic issues and questions posed by the GMOC. It appears that through several pending efforts (including the review of several major master planned projects in eastern Chula Vista, and the forthcoming adoption of a revised growth management Development Phasing and Monitoring Policy), that ongoing review of projected traffic conditions looking out 3 to 5 years will be occurring. Such a continual, structured review was a prior recommendation of the GMOC as a tool to ensure that the City maintains its Traffic Threshold Standard by creating the ability to see potential problems and take remedial actions before they occur. REVIEW OF POTENTIAL HIGHER AND ADULT EDUCATION THRESHOLD As part of its actions on the GMOC's 1995 Annual Report, the City Council requested that the GMOC consider the possible formulation of a threshold for addressing planning coordination for post-secondary education (community college, adult education 1 vocational training). One of the fundamental thrusts for Council's request stems from recent economic development oriented discussions regarding the readiness of Chula Vista's workforce to meet with the changing job market in terms of the attraction andlor retention of local businesses. This is especially true of so-called "higher value" jobs such as manufacturing and technology which generally have better wage scales, and also encompass emerging economic sectors within the San Diego region. In response, the GMOC elected to form a sub-committee comprised of four GMOC members, and representatives from Southwestern College (SWC) and Chula Vista Adult School (CV AS). Since strategic planning services for local adult schools are provided through the Sweetwater Union High School District (SUHSD), a member of SUHSD's planning staff was also invited to attend. The sub-committee held four meetings during the same time frame of the overall 1996 GMOC review cycle. Through those meetings, it became apparent that a significant amount of forward planning is already taking place relative to post -secondary education. Chula Vista is also fortunate to already have a community college (Southwestern), an established adult school program, as well as a proposal in its present General Plan for a future university site within the Otay Ranch project area. In addition to the university site, the current Otay Ranch General Development Plan also contains policies for providing a six-acre site with the Village Nine/Ten area for an adult education center. GMOC 1996 Annual Report 19 (4/10/97) f1- - d-'!/~ ------..-"------.-..,--.------------- ---- - ---- As indicated by the education representatives on the subcommittee, the significant amount of growth within proposed eastern Chula Vista master planned communities warrants the need for a new adult education facilitylcampus in the City's eastern area if future populations are to be provided with adequate post-secondary education services. For example, Southwestern College projects that it will reach its present facility's capacity by the year 2000. The proposed six-acre site in Otay Ranch is a direct outgrowth of SWC's and SUHSD's involvement in future land use planning efforts. It is this "involvement" of affected agencies which the subcommittee saw a fundamental issue in considering whether or not a new threshold standard should be developed at this time. Generally speaking, the City's fonnal Threshold Standards serve as requirements which ensure that growth's impacts upon specified facilities and services are evaluated and responded to before they become a problem, or jeopardize local quality-of-life. Stated otherwise, they foster communication and involvement of the various parties in devising forward planning responses/solutions. Given the amount of forward planning coordination for post-secondary education which is occurring in Chula Vista (and the larger South Bay area) today, the subcommittee did not see a fundamental gap or significant problem which would warrant creation of a threshold standard at the present time. This is not to say, however, that continuation and enhancement of current post-secondary education planning activities are not needed. On the contrary, the GMOC feels that excellent opportunity for such is on the immediate horizon through the continued planning activities for several major eastern area master planned communities anticipated to occur simultaneously over the next 12 to 18 months. As discussed earlier in the Schools section of this report (pgs. 5-8), the GMOC recommends creation of a City Council/School Boards "task force" to address policy and management-level issues of mutual interest, as well as creation of a "technical committee" of City and school district staff to address school siting, timing and other coordination issues in conjunction with the eastern area master planned project reviews. Considering this, and the desire of the Education Threshold Review Subcommittee members to continue discussions on an important topic, the GMOC recommends the following two actions which are intended to coordinate all education planning activities through the previously recommended task force and technical committee: . That the City Council authorize the present Education Threshold Review Subcommittee to continue meeting over the next several months to refine cooperative, post-secondary education planning strategies for consideration by the proposed City/School Boards task force; and, . That the City Council direct the Planning Department to ensure that the proposed "working/technical committee" of city and school district staff, to be fonned in conjunction with pending eastern Chula Vista master planned communities reviews, also address post-secondary education facilities plauning issues as may be appropriate. (H,IHOMEIPLANNlNGIKIRKIFIN96.RPT) GMOC 1996 Annual Report 20 (4/10/97) H-U - - ATTACHMENT B 1996 GMOC Recommendationsl Proposed Implementing Action Summary - IJ-I _._--. --.-....-.,-..--... -,-- ..... --~--"...,----- UJ '" -:5 co en Õ en m en'- ~m-ð~i ~£ø_=t ~ œ~o~.~Ec ~m-5~~icccn ~~-0"C"'0 ,"_~o - ",'"0- _ c: '-' "'C:.¡:o û) CO S::::..c 1I):.¡:o oEmo-s:::: "'C·-~~3..commmc ~_m..c-~m m~~~..c~Ecn .~g ,"o~t-~=E ~8o>üt-;:"'~"C() -- .~! ~ 5~ £.5~m m~æ~_._m ~ > ecuen_co OOC'--C-'= = "'C~..cæoc = ~~:.¡:oOt·-- SmOmm~c mOU ~m'-Coocn cnm=_û) :.¡:o~-_C () O"">c:"'oo.-- m:::..cm.... w....a.m::s ~ Co ~ -~c~ 'Q)~ '-0 O UJ '-üo"C~ >oE~·-"'UJEC.UJ()ü > ~Q)cn Cu ;E-~c£ øQ)Q) ""a::: "'~"C""c:'"'" c: o'-C: _EC.~ ~ æ-~~-m en 4)000 o~-=øQ) C)<C m.J::(QoU or u()"Eo~E'::':' OW; c:~ Q)(,)Þ Q) '" (,) Q)'COL...'- 11III::': m:>..c Q)"'C '- c: 10...- Q) QJ Q) (I)-.-::s ~ ~ .c·-oo mE_~ø>ø :3_ Z::æ ::'::':'Õ-~~ëñ gJ.2"t:·~e"7~80C'"o 0::» ~o~£ '--æ ~ ..c:..§ to ¡; a.N'C e.,g ~Z -C/)C/) ·ü-3:o,s:D.mo _o~c..c:"t'""~a.~æ cn>-c-cn cWe ctlxc ~3:' men m.9.c 0>"5 m"õ mt- .91S.0) Q)~"O ~. ""Z ~_-0·5°.ccn Ec>b_,-CE-~~û)QJ ~ ""'c -3:0- "t:c'-'w E ~~ E :EO 0",.QQ) ......- (Q._{)O_G) ~:¡:;.c~.- m -L... c -cn.co-c en- - :E.9 ~cn~~ ~cøQJm-OOQJ3:õcn 01- Q)t:: E:.;=;_ rn Om::s -E'- .c"CQ)'¡::'- uO :::mca.O>°UJ'ã) ã:.QC g?~~'-::sû)£ <C m a..Q 0 Q) c:.2 .... C) ffi goo ..s::: 0 0 m._..... I- Em-.cEoc.::s c~>m'- .....!Q.!!!"'Cco Cmw '-000 .-~. co"'Cø~co :::t", ø .2~o.ñí-m", c:c:ï=E~EQ)ø- Q)"O~ v ~æc~oEQ) ~ 0 -~Q)w"'C0co C>z -.5~~~~::cE jgEeØm~'-E~m'¡~U) C/)I-- ~cE;:>wo.- a..E-C:::~·- c~ ~U) "'C:E_~~w"'C ~ mUE~~mvlm a:::z -",," C:~omU)c mOm"'C>~occommo -0'- ~oo ~U_cQ)c o_~~m W W c::: a.. 0.2. 3: _ o...c ~: 00 co U) m U 0 00 m _ c I >:E M Ow I I-~ ~ N z~ ~ ~ W! :::IE - "'C "'C co m c co . c E ~ UJ WtJ) "0 CO~.!!! _co '- -ë m C>z o.9uJ"5~ 5c: .Eæ·5Q) og <CO {¡UJEE.o .o.Q o·~UJE -"C z- wCm-c> mõ _c:~o. mm <c1- og::coc 02 ~ffi~.Q .~~ :::IE<C ~~e~'& :ãïn ~ã.~~.= ~.9cn C oo.~ I m~c: - ~mmmQ)c: ..,.. Z m (/) >. 00 C :5 a. 0 >.~ ~ "'C ~t- ~ '- 0.5 ~ :5'-_000 mO ~o ~ -U)~"'C ~ W ~.E·õ: c: ~ ~ 00 U E c>.Q, ~ 00 õ g ~ S:::E ~~mcm -.~ mw£mcoU)mb~ O~ 3:oimEc ~2~ ~~~E~~'~(/)~ c 0 ~.- ~ ~ ~"'C~C:m ~O c:-omo o~~ ·~m~Q)~"'Co.o> C>O .Q.9-enc>~ o~_ g-:5o.:5Q)mmoo W ~ m :g ~ .g ~ -g "0 5.£ ~ Õ c: .9 :5 00 "Cc: cø a::: m (J co ~ ~ 0 0.'- .- m - ~ o.~~E'!!! .E.9~. m3:E~~~o~m Ø) O"'-"'C "'C o~ mco..c~ enC) o "'C ~C:U)~ - XE'-"'C(/) c: ~ o~ooc:m enCJmw 02m m-~,-.- UJw-~ 00- m_ ~>~~ow em 'v_ _co_co .='E->'cOOU)"'-~ ._~> "'C o.OQ) "'C - ~e 0 ~coO~e ~EQ)E =E~m~U).Q~~ o E "'C"O m '- ~ æ-o (J 8 '0 æ.!!! Q) ñí E E §'-co.~ 0 me § c£>~~~.~ o.Eco,-.- -coeno o-Q)3:mco'- Q) Ü mü o-m..c Üm~m-~ m_ -oo~ --0c. om._~,,_~c: enI~m a. c ·~'->~~c~·- .&::-"'C o~ 0- '- 0 >.~ o.mü- '" - -'-~ - -C:O·- ~oE'- m-oCJO ~ O~ø~.9 m~"'-~ U20õEë~~ë o ø..cm~_ ~o.~'~ mè»(J_mm0.00 m O ~-~-(/) co",'- ~cox~Em£~ -0~~Q) .-- Q) ~'--mU)m"'C"'Cx ~ _.~~~'- Q)mc"'C ~~~~ctJ-o,-,-m o mû)-,v2 c>mo ctJomcQ)e20m m ~~2.9.5 O~:5E ~3:ïn8£2_58:5 . '""' ~ ~ ~ ~ \ , ß -z,- df-4~h*f^+ &,__ . '" Q) '" Q) o Q) "iõ £ '" Q) .z:: ",.c .z:: .- - ....."0= mo- - ." " " '" ~.fg .£ .æ m .~ Q) ",-r¡ 1::: 00 C - 0", ~.s '" a. ~" (tJ = .- m "C~cu.Q ,,::> " .z::Q)" ~ '" ~--a>c m m Q) 0 Q) CO 0 ::>.z:: 0", . ._QUJ{/)._1'j _"'0 ;= a.:;; U- Ora"EQ)~ "'0£ :g.a CJ)-..... "'" Q) Q)'- I- ",::>0> Q)~EccoEo c: .L:ê5"C"ffi"C EQ)", Q)"~ .cOG) 0E:w ctI ,S ~ 0'5 c: Q) c:£~_o.~8: 1::::2c: 0"'>, ......-.0 '°..00 '" ;=.- §3c.:; ~m c: c: :J Q) 0'- Q).s::. en'- rn:J"C.º'-UJ~ .- 3= "'C Q) U) :J a."," E~--' ECij"3m...;cn2 UJ Q)..........C)C'" Q) Q)" E Q) ~ ~ E ~ 1;) -.S Q) o.....,!2 - 0 2>o=c:cac: _m a..N om- UJ Q) == 19 OJ.r:.·- 020_ .û)œ "'- . °E'" >- cnE 10 .~ (/J c.. m Q).- c: .5 c:~~ UJ~-£.St:::"';~ "C~_'ffi:Õ~ëï> c: (tJ,c Q) >-m.!! c:-·-_mgl... Q) =t::::J!! ..c c: en:J en "'.z::'" .ºg~Oo.E.e "'0 c: ~ co'm g> CI) .!!!"'E" m ..... ,9- -"'0 mQ)t:::: ~·Q"'C,-~·>m . D-"'E8. -= c:.~ E6Cf)( )°mm cuoë 0ã.ca> _ C ~.5 0 m Q)OC~Q)a.1 .5 E cu:5 ( ) g"C~ "'~'" Q) 0 Co.!:: Q) ,..... -Q) ~oQ)cQ)a. -2u.... co æ >- '->-ti LLQ(J) =Q)ffi"E'-IijE - CtI Q) c: ..ccu;:: CL"O _ CJ) 3:...._._o~_Q) N -..c'- -.z::" _mæ·~~~T'"" .... Coa.. 0 0 f/) Q) ~ Q......"'C ffiu æ mQ).....~-....CL: c: -.... C Q) ==.5 L... Q) C J:: Q) c: -= Q) c: a> cuQ) o.c a. E~~ C)m-'- _0 ~ E~û)~CJQ)g>- CI).Q g>=º .- "Q)"'3:~0 cmob 1:: a. UJ f/)'- C 0 t::.- co > c:"'C.- ctI -.c -"'0 o_.....(/} '" '" '" om~_.Q.~ ï:: m UJ ~ .- .- m Q) c: Co (/).c Q) a.:=!< ._ -.co.....ñí:õ9:è5 0.= Õ -g ê;,.c.2> UJQ)....."'C Q)~ "Eë:gJ2,2::JUo Q)mC:~::::Jc.UJrn Q) ~ 0_" °æ:OC:-:Jm- '-¡,¡::~ <U Q) c:.Q cuQ)"--cuQ.o- >;0(1) CC 0"0 - Q) ,,-ßã> C)Eocu>Q)oQ) ~ocu;cu>'C'JQ) - "':::: ~~0'2Q)~o~ .- -cu c'-E '- Q) C .- iL-Sã. cu-¡¡:: Q)- -- u..cen=Q)cuUJQ) cu !€.- E Q) ~ E :5a.m~(I)~~en Q)cuQ)jg:S-~ã. E"E~E .z::oo ~ Q) "- Q) o~......- ~c'!:::~"5~Q)E ._ 11) ° ° f-oU Oû)..c:5~Eßo;r: I- ° u.. ._ _ _ c ._ en3:!oü I N I ~ N N N "CQ)õ ~ '" - '" 0 '" cu.m "'",;= . - c .!::: ~ '" £ -:.;::; :5Q)Q)~ cuu..~ " 0" (1)'- cu '" .~ 11)0>"0 tl::Q)", Q) c::;a.~a. '" Q) "'" "'.z:: " o .- .- UJ ° => û)::m c.!::: "0 Þ C "- C 0"- Q) ;Q) "E Q) a..!2 c: Q) 0 _ .- a..- "'.z:: - I'- õQ)c."C >- Q) ° C)c..!2 "'''0> 11) ~.- c ; c E-·~mQ. ::>00> ~-5-m ¡¡J 0 1::: ÞQ)_ '- tT;...... C'J Q) 11) 11) - '" E . m"E..cU)Q) Q)~ "- c "E 2: Q) E a. "'- "C C. Q)'_ .- Q) "- Q) " Q) '" Q) Q) C E UJ '" E E ;: ~UJI1)û) "'-" 0.§:8",~ '" 0 -oE..Q o-~>. C ~TI Q)m.!2- 00 - .- UJ UJ C ::J.E .z::Q)>' .Q 11) .!::: c.::J.~ 5 .Q ~ en Q) ;= .c Q) " -"", u.. Q) ~ >._ -"C:5 .Q ::m.Q iD Q)o'õmrn UJ c >.~ O-_ã. "'-- :5 C)"C "5 êi5 .:; Q)..c- _ a. " ::>.- E ~ E'- o E Q) Q) "0_ _.!: c~ CD a.t1U-g ° ~ C Q) .- Q)"C oc:mü,- ; Q)Q) ~ Q) " CD C .- GJ ~"Co ~~Ec.. o ~ '" .!::: m m c u.. ~ 11) a. c _ a. "Oã:::JIDQ) - =>.- ¡¡::Ot_ Q.-~ o 0 ;3:!cum -"'Q) TIGJ"CÛ):5 ~ Q) C UJ C "- C. C U"Q) c~cm.c: :;),,-m- Q)"-Q)C'J "'~ UJ'- - m :2 8o'w « 'w û) ::J-m ~ ,,"-D- o - ;: uÉcC'J 11)Q)"-~ ;=.- " .z::Q)", Z. (I)~"E =-û)"C en O'-mC. .- c Q) c CD 5.E:E=> N üoC)l1)û) :æ ~ ; c c.·w W 8 C) c Q) ~~~~c - '=0:5 -11)00)0 W rn"C:æ- _ c. :J 0 0:: ~c_m mo>.eQ) ¡¡: l-.2en:5 ~8æ£æ ~ N NI N N ~,,~ . II> .c Q)-Q) 0 .!!1 c: ~ õ c-æ0g_ - ~ ~ U) ~ 0(1) ..a .Q..... QJ 0 0 0'- 0 CO o C):.¡:; c: c: .c:'- æ.5 ~ m '- CDõo(ãQ.(I) Q)U):J oQ)C) o ~..c co....."'C.c: Q) ......-E ._.cQ)t» .c:-t:==- ~~= ,-;J .....0 n:J~ m.c-êQ.!: ""'0(1)(0 õo>·§152t..8~ "&.mE,....:.c3="'CI-t: 0;::0>£ ..... 0 ..... Q)"'" c: Q)"'" ~ c: CO ~ '- a. ::JUJ(JO)'§Õ c: rn CO . ~Q)£"C 'õ'-ca::::JE 0>. c:. ~ _:.ëma.E '-.a Q). L...LO..... o.-"C~- CO"'C m >. t»!:: E Õ 0 ~ 3': (/)_1'-- a.N en () û) Q) -- êã Q)a._Coo ._0) Q)=~~Q) O.c: L-m-U)m "O""'o::J3;2 c>o ':; 3': L.., ._ 0> Q ~ c:n.9.~ [g Q) Q)~-"""')'-(I)O'EQ)Q. Q) "C "C.2,.... ~mc "õ .c tt»(1) om 0>10 '- "0-,- ::::;E'_cc'-:=!- mc>~~3':'_"';E'-~ >-æct'læQ) ..... .....c_L... - 0..!2 0 'E -_ U);:]-c.Ecn=mQ.U>Q ;:; 0 .c Cccc.·-ro 0 (I) Q)'- 0 c: 0 3': c: __ U) 0 « m - U) >. 0..a_coo-"C Q) U) .-..... (J 0 5: m19 c: Qj ..... ~~- c:u..a.~Q)"C cnE"E:::8 cnt;:c:t:ttIi-5i Q) C)-cQ)oEm-gc: ..... .- Q) ::s OJ ~ OJ -gc:~gE£a.c: I-t:«QJE'-ou_m CiJ!! E . >. cnQ).QcoQ)'-E&' m.!!;!aõt]50L...g..... co ""C E..c oEScï5..3:°E U) c.z :J co :J .6 0·- OJ ~ Q) r::: ~ Q) g.1:: c."" E uiü 0 co,-«"'Ca.a. ~CI)C) (QcnQ)C)o .eO) C<LJQ)æcom"C 15:æ~K-[ '-[~"'O·-..c:mo .....(¡jCl)8C.c m.cß Q.woO> -ëñím c: ttIi.c Q)"'" OJ"'C..... en ~ Q) 3':.5 1?Qm~~oaQ) a>E-a>oQ>c ceo -Q)C)a.>E ... E ';:..0=..... 0 Q) CDCJ) ......'- 0 CD Q) '-c:00 a>m ~ ~ C).9~{g ~~ E~ ~~æc:.c "0,-.-.... ....~= GJu.. c: c.c.T"".c U) tUoc: c.mGJ1::'O) E OJ·!: "'." >-ccuGJg. o~¿ c.'-·->'GJ:::::J U)mO) Q)2:~4J.e tI)coc.T"" 1::'fE"E.e"3 e c:15.e _ ~~.Q.Q Q 4J 0 2:-,g.Q!..Q 0>>- m 0 U) 0 c.mo--4J .em 4JU)3::::::J~_Š4JQu.. g-~c::Ë3': c.GJoC) ·m.....:GJ- coo_.S«)EO»~ ° GJ>.(J)mc:o:'Qm.!!! 0.2"'.¡!! E := == - - >.'- 0) Q) E =.Q;:; C)c:19J!! >.e,- Q)m"Em~ oOoC:mXT""!:::: °õ c: c: 0'3 01-_ c:o..~m~ e Q)~~ a. c.Q)'õ:e U) Q) c. .0 u- '" Q) U) = "C c: ,Q c: 1::' ._ :::I ~ ." OJ 50>..QQ) c.c:"Oc. - OJ 0 .e~!!!o"Coõ=~co o Q) 0 c: .... () £ ~ c. 5 g.~ æ.5 o.,-_ctlc. f-_ c.1l.<{ü c.~ c.c. I f'1 I ~ N '" M M M OJ . en :ß U) :::I II> "CC:o:;C:-:- c:E.9Q) c: 0,- ,-.Q c: ~(ijc::O ~." ",-1:~~OJ c:_ m co "'OJ_",E 8 tUõ..= a) OJ OJ ~U)_U)C:c.>.~ OJ "'- Ell> ,- Q) 0 Q) 0 ()O QJ_X_= - U) c: > ° ~o '- ° U) Q) c.'- c:-octl>' OJg. Q):::::J 5 = 'ti) Q) ~ Q) J!!:.¡::o U) ° ro g~ 8..c: ~"O_ E u·- ~ .<:::~ ~£m:!:::::Q) - c. '~~~-8~õm ~'~æm'~ 1:: OJ c. mo "C ° 0.<::: o ¡:.c. ~." II>ïñ Q) C) .c '- c.- Ci co !!! ~ë3 co -g >. oc:--_ c.- =~ox :::I 0 c.U)c.Q) "C.c.c mU) ,2:Q)__c. Q) m U) U) Q) II> c: _Q)Q)ëü.c:::::JQ)Q) .2 Q) Q) _ c: »0 OO0"C-oE_ o~ c..~.!!! ëü~ mc: _..t: .c ~c:mQ)oU)"Cm 0.00)'- > œ 19 Q) E ~ co c: C:'æ ø Q)-32T""U) .ti) 8- £C:5'-~ II> 0 U)..c:E-Q)cocoQ)C: o OJ ~ Õ - 0.2 æ o.ëü "C.Q "C~..c:..cC: OJ'" w.!°Q) U»I,..- c: ° U) 0 Q) OJc: '=!30.<:::E·-OJo!3 coco-õE '" '" "C __Q).c_ 0 =õ:BoE o _,-_l-w"O_ =c: ==cooU) .cQ)Q) u E 0 u 0 ocoO)'t"-CDcñ_"'C'- §mtZ;-° c:.- c: I c: W"C c: Q) '- :::1- :::::J "'C t-- m '-._ Q) 0 o'-co_U O~ OC:O)_C)CO C:ì:; Ü :::I c..- 0 LJ.¡!! Ü m ~ c.,S -g m >. c: o OJ u >.°O§~ »11> ~cñ>- ffi-g.æ C)C: co :::: co 0 (!) _ c: ·--u..-coU)c:mU) ü OJü (Y-. en U:Bc:~c. .êU)C: OJ u OJ W Q):::::J= .c OJ OJ::;: OJ E'- E x ~ u "'.2 .c f/) 0..2:'_ £10c:: .c _ Q)o -(I) ü - '- 0.'- -1:::Q)Q)Q).caã>c: ::¡ _:::::J U c: .<:::- -uO - ~C)C).c:3- 3': ctI 0 coc.Q)Q)~ "'~<{ co "C c: - '- "C C. ~.e~£3': ~ 5.U ~¿g:::::Jcoo.cC:u)x Do. ..Q,-__mCDQ) ~ N '" ...1 M M M ~..__a ?-Ý. -~-~----'-~"~~-- - ---. .....---.- - " en c: OJ Q) ~ ~Imo~ Q) c: en Q) Q)C~~-m~ E'- en U £mm~~m~ tQ)2 ~ co -m~mo~ m~m ~ ~ 0C'.l>-êi5~Q)"'C a.'-ä:"'C UJ ""LJ.. ,,2 CIJ;;: .. ~ Z 0:> .~:>~ c"b~ CIJ .. 0.··.· ._~aø~'a. 0)._. ~ ~ m omocE C'.Iroc~ ~ - 1,..........00:=:.._ c_ :J ...J .... ..~ -._" CIJ .-- ECIJ .- " a.q>0C: w- 2c en:=:. Q) ~.,. Q)~~Q)~~Õ mmEÕ cn2 ~ ........'."""Ii a. (]) If) co .- 0 ë: II) 0 a. "C co ..... mco..... > mO Q)"C C UJ.-·""" ~ c: - [. >. (f) Q) Q. ._ W'..·.'.·~ ~~m_mm~~ !C)~~ c:~ "C ,-:z "'C..... > .- .... - c: --- Q) tJJ:_ ::J f/) - "S 3' 'E Q) - ï:: ...... .!: en c: "C Z:h ~~~cn~mm ~c:~ .5~ :J o-.z .S: c: .5 5 ~ 3 a. N.!!! ~~ 15 c... g £L'W (/) .- 0 (/) "'0 a. 0 ..c ..... '- ._ (I)<':E co Q) "5"'C C) c: .~ c: ~.c '5 (/) oS Q) W·.::.:.W. J:: 1O:t: Q).5 00 CIJ m = ..... (/) "C CIJ ..c .. "Ow-- ..... N'- Q) em a=::..;J ëa._.!!!~Q)m .~~"C m:E 0 ft.:. Q):Jm!·-..c::"C T""-..,;._ Q) l!1 II.:···..... E J:: "E ..... a. en to Q) 0 ~ m ..;.'::e c:-'-o,-::J Q)~C:Q) co ~~ ¡.!!!~~8SQ) cn~~~ a.~ .~ «( c.D.. - J:::: ".aoE 1/)09 " ....:._,0 o>....tm"Ca..:: 8..=OE........1 c: U»W o2moQ)~o. tn-00o 8m .Q. ø^ (/)D..a.t:: co Q)mwu ¡¡::J:: .....(1) ~ ~m .orocCO) '-~..c ..... rom q ~~~a.~mg~ s~o~ ~~ ~"C m ..c - >'Q)Q) I,...Q)-2 ~ >a. 0',: :,:j~a.9:"'Ccnã.C) m'C="c: a.t:: w=> " m~umm c: -'-Q)..c:: co ~ m~~ mmE'~ '~ø~o E~ .~~ ~ ~~ooo~~o~ .-mOOm 000 ~_ ~~~œm~Uw w~.~~ Um ~~ I '" I ~ N M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CIJ " c: E m (1) c: c: ro>-..~ CIJ~ 0 øm m-m o ã:..c (1)tn = U) (1) -(1)~ 0- U)~ U)-c:..c m ~ m~_ m o~ ~ ~m ~U)._ ~ o~ m ~U)mC: ~ ~ ~mm ~mOOO~m -00 = -oo>~ ~_ow ~~~~ ~U)CIJ- - -00 ø m·-m~ 0000_ c:.... 00 ~ m -.- m ~ c 00 m m m ~ tn- m -c -g m ~ 19 tn ~ ~::2 ~ ~ ._ .?;- ~ m ~E~~.~~~~m~~ ooc:~w ~~m2 o~m~ m t: ~ m .~ U ~ m _ m ~ _ :e ..c tn m 00 _ 00 - :c ~ -mL·~E ' m-_ C:oo'-C: moom ~mC:~ oo~m- mmBmm~ m ~~ o~~~ m.~Om m~-~~m ~~- E~CIJ -~m -ooo~ 2o~02-~Em-o æ'~~ ~-5~ OOmm~ m ~cmommø-o~ ~~-~ m~~m ~~ø~ .~~ o~--t:m ~ ..c~ -mE~ ~ ~ ~m~~o~uo·~t:- i=~m OOmo~ ~~mtn e15-~-m·~~Bmm OE:=£ ~ã)0~ ~m:5.~ ~.-~OC:tn~E·~~m m _ m~_Q) ~ o~ ~~ ~ ,Q ~ ~.- w 00 ~ tn C ~ o.¿ .c tn 0 ~ m ~ 0 a¡ mmc: m m~_m-o .~m-mO '...J-CC- ~=-~ _~o~_~~'u 00 cEmoo~ ~o- -..cø m-~em~m~C:_! C:~C~m _~._o _~mm £c~m~:=;ClJIDI/)E ~m~~ o19mt: 0m~~ ._~ c ø _0 D..~~OC mØ~ mm~- CIJ Ec·-em:=øo- ooo.~ tnm .~-E- ~~ o-owmm _~o ~ ~~m~ ~ (1)0 ~mo~m~ '~m'?;-E ocomm _C-ø _m>_ oo>om,Qom =m mm :5~ ·-m,~m ,-£ c ce~~-m~Om'ðE .~ ~ - u O_mm ClJC.0E·~ã)-oo:5m ~Ectnm> cmmc c:oooc c.- 0 - _ ~ ._ m c ~ m ~ 0 ~ ~ = 0 oocm~ 0 =~ ·~m o~-~ 0 ,0 gm~u.~mEooS~ã) g2~CIJ~~' umE~ U§'EEC. mtn --.- m> c ~~ ~ . ._._ ~ gm~~g'~'i2~15m g=w_c ~gg~~ ~m.g8 w Uoo..c~œEcmm=O u~~ffi~ U~tnt:~ U~tnm æ ~moo .~mgR~tnoo .?;--CE~ m~e&Q) Q»'~ø' ~ .-Umm_e~~ em '-m0t:~ ~'-'-Emm ~m~mm U~_~~mo ~~:e U~o_m -E ~~ -_e ~ ~'Y-E e m- ~ 'U_ _ E 'u -mmø'Y m m~œ~c.tn~Q)m~~·ð moo~~ClJm m2m~~c. m~~m~C. - ~Q)œ ~m--..c~m ~e- ~o_e ~.-x- ~ ~~~~<~.~~=~~ ~m2o~ ~~oom~ ~.~Q).~~ ~ N M ~ ..rl ..r ..r..r..r \j-S . ~_ en· ~-om ~m~ - z.e:e: ~ -e:- _...._e: ·-3=0 ·-We: .~a.e:W OO:¡:; ::J :>: UJ UJ 0 ~ > a..9l E -æ ~ UJ m - ~,~ m cnã:) m ~ ~ :ß e: m ~ E ::J - Q)U e::E- .-....o0"Cn:I .!: en e: e: ~ ::J en ::J cn:¡:; _- '" ~ Q) 0 .... _ ..c: Õ C'" m:a ~ ·3 ~ '" '" ....C)_~oümQ) "CQ)..c.... iô iô a.mffi _ '::'o~coe:oQ) " " ·....E3=æcn§oe:Q)E-;S a> a> UJQ) 0EQ)o~o(/JO-- t ..c Q) e: 'õ ° :¡:; m .... a. =' ..c: ..c: oE~ e:e:OMe:..c:-O- - - ~Q)C)Q)0Q)"" Q)o - - a> a> .....- -.... E.... UJ"C co Q)En:lm1::C)wQ) ='...."5:¡:; " " Q) Octl:E..c: a.Q)0e: .:;; .:;; UJ(I)~"Ca..... -Q) ..coQ) e 0 a=' e:a.Q)-o>oE - ~ o..cmm..ce:e:o- z.0 a. a. £,¡::o ~m..cUJQ)._a.. co m=~Q) E...._ m e: EO ctI >- 'j¡ 'j¡ 15 > '- C):5 Q) G =' Q) 0 .... Q) ~ a.Q)Q).!:;C)E B..cëñQ)..c:"É>rn " " 0.£ > -g e: Q) ffi m ~ .S: £ - =' > o ai 0 =' m .-..c"C 00....0 ëñ :is ëñ en"C..c:j!!"E-C:1::.-:..'- o....(]:; :~ ~ .:;; o e: E ~ m c)=' 0 UJ o.E ö:5 > 1:1 ë. i:5 _m Q)C)e: o.::>UJO ä:: > (I) 02"C ~ o=ª,a.c.!:;'='::'z. "'''' '" Q)C)(I)e: Eo~wm Q),õ>- .§ .~ " ::J Q) >-::>ë m m -ë=ª,:ã: n:I m ." e:·-en o.e: 00.- a>_ a> :¡:;C....õË~mm:ê8mß"mO a>'- a> e:e:Q) (l)00e: a. OQ) " en " . 8m3=:ß:ß8C)-:J~~"C-:5 .5:1 co .- " "'a> fJ) Q)-.... e:C - Q) (tJ " en ,,- = _ UJ .9- C) E '2 (!) ~ Q) en a. e: .!:; wt:: w:ß 0000'" .-::¡¡.-::¡¡::J.Q.Q a> 0 a> ::J c: ....e: Q)ea = -Q)-- ='z.-ï=rnOOE Q).r::.e->:ac: ..c:a. ..c:CT o._Q)a..e:>- co:;:~=,Q)"cro r ~ f-~ oo::E= ¡¡::UJ~r--.:"C:;:UJ"Cma.. I ll) I ~ N ~ '" .,.; <Ó ~ '" £ - ::J ¿ 0 - - Q) ,- ::J ..!!! '" ~ ;: .8 t:: -'e.. "::J en" '" en'" --", o.a e: "'a>a. a>"- o .....Q ~ è:'en ·c "en _::J a> "a> '" en (I) Q) c: m:!: .~ .Q Q) m 1::C:£Q) E - '" o a> 10':00 oQ)_<9 Et::'<:> E 0'- :t:..c:a> ::J '" _ ~ > woQ)"c en a. () J2C:ro a>:C E .2! "'enO e: 0- . .O!: ;: 0 g- .- ::J () a>"'::¡¡ ';;;-g..cO ~c:-"'C "ene! "C....ü:æ: ='ro-m en- " .2§Q) .2OOc:(!) c: a. Q) (I) 0,_ .r::. ° " ~ o .- ~ £ñi- " 0 a> ouo>- .- 0 00 ~ 'æ~~ e:oo£ C:c:Q)- "CQ)='U C:_(I)Q) ,Q C) UJ .Q 0 ;: 0 ro~ .r::. .~ c: t en - :t:: - Z'- >.¡:: 0 .S: ~.~ t m UJ 'õ- .- 0 a. .- 0 0 -mmO C~Q) C co ~ 0- en a. " ~ a."a> to. (tJ ~ ~0"C C)EQ).... 0..Q 0 Q) ï:: E õ .§.- E"C a. Q) _ Q) :ß Q).c . Q)UJQ)- o.>e:e: Q) ëo > .,g ::J a> a> .~:5m15 .£:"'I"""" e (I) UJ"CE"5 cnE.cO- cnN a. Q) = >-10 0 w Œjo~~ C:c:E.c o(ñQ):!2 e! ~ w 0 .- f- g¡ c: ::J .... .- < Q)-Q),..... Q) :E 8>,..... :::la-=' ..c: "C cnm 0.- Q)..c Z _Q)mm :5~mcn w O:scn- ~ ..... >.~"'I"""" _o.c:m 3: _Q)m8> CO·¡:: m m 0·-"'1"""" m a. 3= e: .r::.Q)....Q) ..c....~UJ W ..cxQ)m C ~"'Cc:6 ~a.,,:!: rn ~Q)UJ.... ~ N ~ ",I .,.; .,.; uil <Ó ß -/;, - - --..,.-,.,".-." ....-----... ---...- ----.------....-... . lJ.. j?;- ~ 0 "C._ ~ . o ..... ~~.- ~ .- ... (1 0 Q) _ ~< -y, '~~ø- =~ ::;s- 0'5 _a..........O~ ~o. c.. en c: c: ctJ_.- ", .~ :J a. Q) (t .- m ...n :t:: Q) ¥I - ..... Q) E.ft "C 0 0) co,... Z. o"C m .... UJ on C C)T""" .....;:; Q) U_..... ~(t n:Jm UJ O .... c: VJ x co - Q).... ..c:: ," o"Sæ en Q) Q) o.c.. -Q) -.... Q) -c...... .... ..... oJ c: -..c c'- H 01) .....o..c::c m:f:;:m.....o m3= #:, Q) C .- ..... .... D a.. Q) ..c:: ..... .~ .!:.- .bc:"(i) (I)..c~u-c ...../<C OQ) (I) OJ:: Q)Q)(1 ~O CQ).Q ...... '-..... OJ:: Q) _ QJ ...... 0 C/) m ..... cñ > 00- >. .~ a. fir-it!) £; en .... .æ .S a. '0 E ra (ñ .a 0> .g w:-,z 05 2m(/) rn.mm..c:coo. em tn.,.___ ..... ._ m "'C C1) C:.- O)....:t::..o '-=::: Q) '- Z ¡... (I):> 0.'- ~ (1 "" Q) . '.':.:.Z' .2 en. >:J::: Wo. c: 0..... >.0. ..c.E 0,·.... a..::s,.... > Q) ....W- ft::\.",W 0 U 0) >. Q) t5 0 32 a. -æ CD >. "'C ....> _WQ) ctJ-c ~ w..c::-.... tJ)}:E Qj::¿;T""" Õ.=cor:::- -g~o~~= ~~ W)Jj --0) Q)gg>m cam3:(Qroo.Qc 0::,_:;;;;;.1 ~ ~ .= ..c: .- ,= ~ c: ..c: ......... c: > ß ,:::".Q¡, :> ......... ..... ~ co..... c: 0) C 0 ~ C/) 1L. ~ :::s ............. .- c: Q) 0 o:¡:¡ a. W)_~ ~ ~"C ~ .~ ~~ 10 IV t: c.â) ~ en -g ~ E:::sC/) -..c: 0 ~E:::S~Q)m co( ) ~::.:-C:::> .- cr co ..... '5 iü õ 0 t: 0 .... E a. ..c: ':; ~'" raQ)"C cn..... wra....o Q) (/,):<W o....c: m«roO a:::a.'(jj3=oCt c:~ ,^ Q) Q) :::S:>- Q),........ 0 VI .... "'C C) cr ffi :> - 0 ::; co :;:; Q) o Q)cm ~-"CU ~ c:(J)C)~ o£ ft; ..c: co m Q) 0 .... 0).- I C._ Q) ...... ..... - ~ ~ ~ E ~ co c: _ I"-- '5 W .!:: "'C O UJ.... Q) .G..:::: c.. .- 0 0> ,... - "'C ~ . ..... ~ ..::.::::.¡::¡ ..c Q) co (!) c: Q) O>.=: c. _ co ~ ~~Q) tQ)- Q)C:'-~EE co~ Œ.' QJgQ) ::J3:0Q) ..c.!2e>-oo..cc D:::> E LLU) ~= t-a.. a.LL 0 ° t-.E I \D I ~ ~ N r---: c:xj cO » "C o c: m ~ UJ m "'C c: 0 Q) C:'- Q) .- c: Q) :;; E Q) _..0 _ ã; co.~ C)~"'C Ea..:=x ~~::ë ~m C)C:8 t:E3::!? Q) 'V::Jo.--'- QJ QJ m QJ m a.. ..c 0> a.. c..cUJc ..0 c.~~oo - O>-:E -UJ~'-~_ Q)c:-~ Q)E~ma.. Q)="'C~== DmmUJ Nmc:E~ ..c..oc:Q)..o~ -£ ="'C'-~ _mmQ.m Q)a.. ~ mc:_OC: û) O=Q) -~o c:m'õ-J!! '§ Q) Q) C. ~ g> .~ 2 UJ ffi ij: Ci5 c: 0 c... coo> mUJ a.UJ ~E 0 ::J_~ a.-Q)Q)::J oml"--E -"'C0~Q) -~~ ~~O> :t::-U- ~UJ-::JQ)~ c...:::: 0> 0 mO c:UJ t~~m2 c.UJ~o _~~~m O.EoQ)~m m..::.:::~ UJQ)_:E --- 3: Q)~Q)C: Q)~"'CQ) QJQ)Q):="'C. ..cm..o.Q ..c..cQJ~~ ::J-..c3: QJ"'CQ) Z _a..,gUJ -I-UJ"'Cm .~LL_ EQ)ëij 0 õQ)o.~ õc:offic... c t: m -£ 'm .~ ~ ¡::: ~ ;; 0 E ~ .Q -g ~ QJ oS_~~m <C '-_c:E '--Q)-..c o~QJ~Q)~_ "'Cmmo "'Cm x- - :::::....::.::: :> ~ QJ.2 w _..c ..c 0 _ ~ >"'- ..c 'õ ~UJ ~C) c::: "()-- 'õo="'C~ c:_UJmE_cQ)~c 0 CQ)~UJ C:QJmQ)c> QJ .... m'- QJ'- ,..". c: :> go .QQJ..cC: W g~_£ gu...-a.c: oo.æg~~m c::: U~.!!!c: U-g·~~.Q »lJ.. (1 i!! 0 E c »Q) 0 Q). ... (1 0 ã. - ~ .... .... c:....c: Q) .... c: 0 .- ..::.::: :> Q) ::J m Z·- 0 :> _ .-....... .- OUJ .~C)UJ « U-"'C:>~ U~:ii"'C~ .. Q)l-m-gñí.5 _c: Q):t:2Q) ° Q)~EQ) 0:: J:: Ec:E"'CO U'J ..cCOQJ- .em-C) W - ~ '-._ c: ':>. ~ _ - _..0 3: _ a.."'C c: c: .... Q) 'm "'C - m .... _ UJ a. m QJ c: Q)._ <C ~--o"'CE= ~ m"'CE~'- m=Q)UJ~ :::. ..c:~ooC:QJm « .cc:o» .c~E~Q) > 1->~om"'C~ a.. I-mom~ I-"'Cmc..c ~ ~ N ..:1 ,...: cOl cO cO ß~7 '" .8 .S '" o g'_ "E ca CJ) - 0. ro '" 0 .¡:: ..... :wo~Q) -2 ~ 0- tI) Q) C'IJ..c:"'" E N ro .- ~ '" '" '" '" :J > 10 ~ C) Q)I-"O..... a.Q) ''''C c: !/1 0'" m¡¡::o..o'=o..c:..q"a. -5 z ","0 E = (¡; c "'Cu:Jm.....:ãj-_"'C:J Q) '" 0 o .- g-C:è5 E>offiu:Q)~ 0 0::- -cc-m'E co _ -c . Q)"'" ..a ¡::: -'-¿ Q) :J E ro C>Q)~ Q) C""'C"'CNÕ 0 OJ roO 0). 19 .8 C'J ã)oQ)~æ c:o"-'-(/)cnQ)C\Ï -.~ 0 c: m'- '¡::= 0 co LO c::!:::: "'C = c: .....< '" c: '" L... >. en - co 0 ;: g.T'"":.c .5 (''or 2 (/) ffi ._ 0. "'C:=:~~Q. c.. 0.._ ..... _ -. co Q) _ !/1e, E"E E c: ü ~ 5. Q) ~Q)oa.oæ-T"""ã)~a..N c: 0 '" rol- c..£: 0.:5 E CJC a.g m '-.~ >.~ Wz eoo cn.E¿·-- !/1- 'S:Ü en 1:: O"'C C) Õ C)~.5g ~- cn-g Q):g Q) z¡.., c: c: '" OC:~C:C: c:æQ)rn :Jcm"C:JU'J Wo" o..~ ~ m~ C/)·-o..cx=..co '-Ec OZ (/)"'C '- Q) Q) a. -;: 0 ._ c: ~ Q..= f/) Q) B..:!a.~c:?:cicnæroEa. a./W ~t/) 15 ~ C)c"C"EE o - c: c: 0)_ CD 0 en !/1:e ÞEro Oc«ntmUJ·_'-O"..... Q) .- ~ c: 0 ..... Q) Q) c..'-_ (/) m-g ° ,-=CfJt> I- W<W ü.em .-:¡::j Q) E 15.. ·_0 --4) me a::u ~E"C mg:êEE Q)lL. crilL."'" ¡i.0 1-_ rn..c'- Q.; Q.-c .- £õ1:- Q)'-'S:~ m ttI--c .u.:e -oc: ~Q).28o c: fIJ ~CI ~() m'Ë E"C..c: Q) 0= m a.c::"'C ~-- w_· - .a '-moc:oo>û),- Q)cn..Q ¡$8 '- :J 5 >-N c: co..c .- 0 a...c:.- en ..?;> tt= :J ï:::: .æQ.:;::¡ ;om.....o ~~ E":z:; (/).:: > = ~ e ~ c: '" '" c: 0 0 m ~ 0 ('IJ m'õ w..c: Q) (l)W m-cCU me.> ¿m e mOO 1:: - (Q-C""'''O !/1 E c: E :ßm.Q..a. UJu..9oct':J~_'- '" ~ ~ ..ca.·-ro..cm_c:-gm 0 WI-£': ,-..c"""- 0. c...... ~.ç: m 0..2 ::J t/) CD 0. 0 0 CD ..... CD Q.; £ CD ,ç: .~"E ~ CD"O t/)]5t/)æ(ij,=,=-g,-CD~~ \0 "'0 ,_::JZ-'- '-'-xCD.o·-E w m ,- m ,- "0 CD Q.. I-CDCDCD .0 "0 a:: _c]5 :::: 1: "':J '" ~ := en..........Q)EQ)'-E ctI c.- m S Q)'ü Q) Q) ~ ~ 2::J ~ g 0 Q.; ., "':J .....oog..l:: O::::!: 0. m _ U ,_ 0. m£.棣wQ)mc...I::uO I r- I ~ ~ N 0 c; c; ~ ~ 0 c: 0_ '" ~'" - ",- C:o "Omg. 'E. >"O.Þ N .- Q) cD '=m-E_t/)~83 :'¡::;CD'= o c:E.o- '" ",:J coO>oo :9: m Q) w 0 ,- c:..... > c: 0 o .c:'¡::;'="Ot/) U ..I::roctl œ Q) 0. >.1- ..... "C gCDU :.¡::;CD.....u03m É '= "c U ,en g. ::J"ct/)::JuoO> ,5£ 0> =.....;j"CQ) - ,=mt/)_ .s:;; o.....EO> .c ctI"Cm:;c0u.. ~(1)"'" c. c. a:: '= t/).?:> - c: 0 o "'- t/) m - U ,- '= is ,- N "C ,= "C ~ N en m t/)u.....o -.- c mctlmOñi~,2 $ en m m ~(ñ Q) o rJ ctI "000 :JE m3:;wo> ::J.c t/)..I:: en ' ::J.......... "Ceno 5-'~ >.£ ~ õ.: '" c.., E t/) m 0> CD m c 0> ã; ~ 0> ~.5 0 '" E .- '-(ij..l::..I::uo>o c(1):!::::"g¿ ::J ..........mEo "0 '- '- CD .c '" 0.0 0.3 en - i5.. 0> m..... ::J '-..I:: U (ij "C = e 0", 0 .....oot/)Q).....ctI 0,- ..... '= 0> m:J.....c£'-Q) 3:;cmo. .....t..... 00 ctlCtI__ ctl°cc'-E £-gwQ)0.E,= U) 0 '" CDo.C.Q Õo 0>06.8"0.....'- ~Et:::a ê,=oñJÆ::Ju '- u C C t/) .c m m .- :,¡::;'-oë m-g~ ~ 0 ~..I::- m 0> '= B.~o.g> '="C:EQ).....'- c..... CD g t/) E ,Q 0,= EÆ N>' o '" ~ 0",(9",>011 Q)"C ã; t/) 1i.i ~ Õ Q) c...c t/) =~t/)'-8'5,~ õ_.....:.c: 13uiQ)ë.~o"", U._~ 0 c-0 EOC..... cO>FE::JQ)c c: > u.. - >. Q) '- o.b°,= ::J '- .-.s=.s= m ::Je-Q):!::::,-0. '-t::t:::o O::J 'm()l-.r: 00.°313 m.r:. ~ 0.00 o ~ æ£..... ,3: o ""0 '" ~ >. U ~ W >. m - m 0> >-~.r:.m-Q)o ::¡ :!::::,=Q).s= :!::::EQ..'=.J::.œ-g :!:::: m .......c _ -g '- Oo-ã) U .-..... m..... Ot/)õ~~õC) « '=c"CO>.....c :J (1) ~ ~ œ Q) o·Q 0>:; æ Q) ..:.; ~ ~ t/) m.Q ,ç: (ij 0 ..1::=0.8 £:'¡::;õ'~en>E « .....:;$.....õ"C~ ..... 0'- .....g::J~'="CQ) 16 0. g>~ () .....omo.Q)- I 0:: m"C"CQ)Q>mã, I/ m "C o·-.::J Q) ..1::'-'-0 .J::. m m x o'~ E .s= t/)o."C eo> ;;: I- ëii '" ~ I- '- a:: Q) ..... "C._ ¡¡ 1-~::Jmo.3:¡¡:: ~I ~ ~ N 0 .,;1 c; c; ~ ß-8' - ,-,-~---"---,.,-^". ._--~,. --'" Q) "0 .<:: - 2 c: 0 .- c: II) >-Q) Q) "'", :5 Z 0._ 0 o~ Eè:' "OQ) :J '" ¡:: 0.<:: -'" .<::- ~ '" 0 Qjo Q) -:c:r: E '" "0 U '" c: Q) We¡ "OQ) '" c: Q)- Q) '" _c: Wz o :J -'" 11)_ C:a. '" "0 - Zl- Q)::¡;; o.§ OZ :51- ::s:¡::¡ a,;W _u >-- =ro 11):5 0'" ;;:- WW _ :J :1= ë3 o.c: ..0:::;..1 E c: . '" c: 0)<013 _ :J 1.i.;0.. '" 0 o Q) c: c:Ü u.;~ _.<:::J -0 .Q~ c:r: ~õu "'.- 1-0 .s:..... Q) :~ Ü II)W -u.<:: o~ II) C::J- oE 0 0"0>- .~~ uc:..o a.. = 0 ~ c: .- o"C Q) Q) 0 3:Q)2 ê E 0::: :I=~U .- :J a.. ",:J Q) "'u - - ~ c: 0 (f) ::s .- _"0 W"O ~ N I ~ ~ CD ~ ~ r -'" Õ Ü"O c: c: "C ë ~ ~ o .- c: c: Q) .- '" Q) OJ :a Õ .~ ::s Q) '" .<:: .~ a. '" E .- >- l~ - &. C)"'O.~= o::¡;; c: > '" Q)- o Q) '" .- E Q)::¡;; c: c: ",l- e. 2 (f) Q '- ..0 :.ãa>C) c:- !§ ñi -0- C) S Q)'E . E E .!: iii ï::::: co g' '- ï::: ~ ,f: 0 :JQ)a. c c>û) ..... Q):J . .-I-WQ'-- c:E::¡;; o Q) .- Q) Q)C:a. '" x Q) .f: æ~ ;;:-t""æè:' Q) ",I- o Q) ~ g~~5.s:m > Q) Q) .....cDa>û5 g>Cl)1- .EêQ)Eg>~ «(J).<:: 0.>.<:: W.<::CD "0-- m«-(/) -0> Q)m:5Q)W~ ~ '" ~ ::!:-cJ::.,9¿ ...;_0) '-'- Q) :5 Q) o..c _ OJ ..c:a;'O L... :=: a. c:U~ I-tc: E:C~~ Q):J.<:: _..c:-oë~ E-g:=: 0.- "'C"'" Q) en õ«:J Q) I- '" to;;: ~õæ.!1Ern '" Q) c: EQ)--c en.c Q) c: '" U c__ 0>1:::= _.<::0 Q)_~m 0.0"0 o o..-::.lEro 0 c:-:;:::; OOõêi5:r: Q)- Q) o :::J Q."'" c.. t: Q) E '" o - "'C "'w::s Eo.:! Æc:::r:1:: Q) c: .!: §~ Q) 00.. "':J Q) "'~'" Q)- > ~ 0 Q) -"'c:'" Q>u_:5u>UJ!3 Q).- 'C Q) 1-.- Q) fjQ)E(/)~.9~ '" '" Q) ttc:~ o-~ Q)mE ~§o. «0'" a.:5mQ)~( )E :5lEe a. Q) U >- '- c: '-"0 ~C)C>..c .~ c: C) c.. 0 C)¡'¡:: Q) Q)û5- :ëo.2 m-emo::::æ >(9ã. -.f: :ilë ::s:;:; 0 ="'a."O="'E o E ~.!:Q)Q) Ü a.u"O gë ..c:-gEm E"O Q) .- '" E Q) 0 :J<vg>.2Q.Q)Q) -gE~'" ~CI):5 Q) c: x ii: oE·_J:: J::.r: a:"'Q) ::¡;;Q)Q)Q) LL -uQ) (,)"003:0)-- ~..o '" ~ _lEE ..... c::=:. :5 c:..... '" '" Q) m Q) c: ~a...... :; 0- I- .<::~.<:: ..c EO mm..... ° 1-1-- I-m::!:::ã::5IE-g . . ;:1 ~ "! ~ ~ ~ ~ ß-q "Ôc: !!! 0 1J Q) '" .- >.CC)(/) Q)- (/) en ~ c ca.!: c: C) C).- C)Cl:Je>§8. c: :J"O . C:-C(tJOO ~(/)Io...c ,::oï::-m Q) 00 Q) en 0._ C;:CQ..'- ElOuñí .!!:! I1J ~ >..5 '" 1J N a.. 'S; c.~"O Q) Q) c'¡:: ..c::.- ctI 0 Q)~~:JCD _ C> ;;;; :5 Q):= E:9 .....Q)t:- ca.....o:J U E ~ C'\ --m rn (.) ..c:: ~ a. m I... _ 0 (/) ....... êi5 a.~ . <.J Q) U) :J._ "¢ 8. c: "'C 5 ~ (/) Q) "'Oo·Q Q) (I) g It:: 15·~ coñi£m coeu_ S Q) - C> N'-:J 0 (/) ~ '" N.8~t:g o 1J _.......m::; c: '- 32 0 C'\f-g ~ ~ Q) mw>..c:: E"'O 0 (/) ..-Q)(tJ(1)U) t: 0 c..= U) 1::"0 m-Q) .- C Q) ctI c: 0 g Q) 0°_ ar'-"'" :J OO"'C (.) Q)~ C:-SQ):JE o CD "'0 0 8.01{J~E "'Q)() U) 3:......- C>c:~ '" 0 c::.¡:::; CO . ~-oc:ü .- c: 0."'0 c: C. 0 c: 0 Q) C 00> :;:::::1- æ u a. Q) -E...;-rnctl ã:"'OC/J- L... t: c: c:.2 co CO'- C -._ ro =CO>"'E..c: m5-c£ E a. Q) 0 (.) . ¢:~æ.s ·_Q)Q)OQ)~ (/)0 L... 01-..- I '" I ~ N N N ~ ~ ~ - Q) c: o .,; > o =Q) c: ~ o .Q c: OJ ~ - 0 ~ IV·- a. .Q.5..!. Q)-ë ë~õ 0 z ñiã)cn3;!t: Q)'E§ ~c. o Q) 0 ( ) ro EE·-1JIOC. 0 ~Ea.§i1f to5W1jCO ~ co 0 0 2 c: Q) W Q) Qf 0 ~ C. 0 c( ..... :J.2= 0 0 Q)_c..!QU.c () cc""'_- o~·-a.~>. ::I Q):;:::~ .:x:. ._ "'C '- I ro C fJ) c: Q) ~ (/) ~.ÉQ)2(;jE w ~Oa.._ro .- 0 E en 0 en 0.(00)..... 22ê5cua.m !3 00 Q) en W-Om"'C J2õ>-EwfJ) ::I £Q)Q).=ffi a...5Jl19m~ C Q) c: (/) 0 -'" "'~ Q)......- a:l ~ '- o·-"'C ~ c( N ~ ã:i C) .....0->"'0._ C '¡:: E.... 1::- _~==mro.C) Z .,g E o'E g o ro- 0 c: ""'o""'C..c:: CD",o..... :J (1)'- c( :Jocn.!S!o .: Q) (/)..c:: - c: 0:: ro ..c..c: a.(/) "0 (/).....0 co ffi ",- - = 8..g c (/)-a. w =(/)cc>' o 0o:!::: goû)ffi3': J: 53E:¡:,() ::s ......-..... Q) (/) CI o Q) '" oa."C(/)·:;.~ 5: .. U":;"êg-g UQ)_ctlQ):!::: .coQ).....= ..JC ~Q)~~~ ~.....~C)(/)~ c(..J .- c::: Q) a. .-..... C Q)- _0 ()1J"'~o UctI~._.- I-J: - ~ .c "C:!:::c zen Q)°xma. ~""'''Cæ§g ww £~Q)-gQ) .....~~a.Em 1-0:: .....Q)cO..c: _ '" U OJ: m..... 0..... co (/) >.£ E ::s .c..c:~Q)>' .cc.....·-o"C D..I- 1-1-.....(/)..0 l-Q)ë33uQ) ~ N ~I N N ~ ~ 8 -10 ,---------- --,--.----.. -------~ - ATTACHMENT C Draft Proposed "Statements of Concern" to the School Districts - ~v?-- :~--~ ~~~~ em OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 29, 1997 President Sandoval and Members of the Board of Trustees Sweetwater Union High School District Superintendent's Office Administration Center 1130 Fifth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91911-2896 RE: City of ChuIa Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission 1996 Annual Report, Statement of Concern Dear President Sandoval and Members of the Board: On April 29, 1997, the Chula Vista City Council took final action on the 1996 Annual Report from its Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) regarding compliance with the City's Quality of Life Threshold Standards. Based on written and oral presentations by school district staff, the GMOC's report contains an overview of the efforts by the two school district's to keep up with growth and the resulting effects on the students of Chula Vista. Based on its review of the GMOC report, the City Council approved the issuance of a Statement of Concern to both school districts. The Statement of Concern regarding the Sweetwater Union High School District is enclosed as Attachment "A". Also enclosed is the City's Growth Management Threshold for schools, see Attachment "B'. The Statement of Concern and its recommendations should not be perceived as a criticism of the districts nor as an attempt by the City to tell the districts how to run their organizations. The recommendations are instead an attempt to create a partnership between the districts and the City to foster dialog on these issues in the hope of reaching solutions. The intent of the Statement of Concern and its recommendations is to emphasize the need for a team approach to addressing the capacity issues in the two school districts. The converging trends and circumstances which have created overcrowded schools can not be solved by the school districts alone. The City urges the school districts to join with the City of Chula Vista and others in the community in a joint effort to solve the school's capacity problems so that the school districts may concentrate on education. I invite the two Boards of Education to meet with the Chula Vista City Council to discuss the feasibility of forming a task force to work together towards solutions. Sincerely, Shirley Horton Mayor cc: City Council, City Manager Attachments: A)Letter of Concern, B)Schools Threshold (gmconcm.let) - c:- -I 276 )RNIA 91910/(619) 691-5101 -.-..-'"..---.--. .._u.____._____ ___ _._.____._u_. ATTACHMENT "A" - LETI"ER OF CONCERN City of Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission STATEMENT OF CONCERN RECARDINC SCHOOLS [Sweetwater Union High School District] The City recognizes the efforts of the Sweetwater Union High School District to provide quality education in the face of severe capacity problems caused by: 1. Continuing residential development in the expanding eastern portion of Chula Vista. 2. Demographic changes in western Chula Vista resulting in an increased student population despite limited residential development. 3. Higher than usual studentihousehold ratios in some of the new communities in eastern Chula Vista. 4. Changes in the residential build-out"of large communities resulting in delayed openings of new schools in developing neighborhoods. I. CONCERNS: Despite the best efforts of the school district to accommodate the above factors, the City is concerned because many of the schools are operating above capacity. The City is further concerned that the measures the school district has been forced to take in order to accommodate the student population growth could possibly result in a reduction of the quality of education for students in the district. The decisions which the district has been compelled to make have resulted in the following circumstances: 1. Four of the five high schools are operating above capacity. OIÙY the newer Eastlake High School has remaining capacity. 2. One of the three middle schools is above capacity. The current conditions have the potential to reduce the quality of education for some of the students in the two districts. A reduction in the quality of education (in many cases driven by the need to physically accommodate enrollment), goes directly to the educational "quality-of-life" at which the City's Threshold Standard is aimed. A perception (and in some cases, a reality) that an area's schools are overcrowded and that students will not be able to attend the neighborhood school can alter the perception of a neighborhood or community's overall quality-of-life. The school overcrowding issue is effectively a citywide issue, deserving of the City's interest and involvement. C -J-- - II. RECOMMENDATIONS: The GMOC recommends the following: . That the City Council, in cooperation with the two school district boards, form a task force to look for solutions to both the SUHSD and CVESD districts' capacity problems and to address other policy and management issues of mutual interest to the City and the districts on an on-going basis. One initial topic for the task force could be development of a campaign to educate the public about the need for passage of a school facilities construction and modernization bond measure. . That the City Council direct appropriate City staff to form a working/technical committee with the districts' planning staff to comprehensively examine phasing schedules in the context of reviewing a number of the major developments in eastern Chula Vista over the next year. Their fundamental charge should be to address the interdependent relationships of the projects relative to coordinating the timing for school construction to reduce the extent of interim housing and overcrowding. C - 3 - ___"m - - -----.-_.__..---,._..-.--,--~------ SCHOOLS .- iMJ.. : To ensure that the Chula Vista City School District and Sweetwater Union High School District have the necessary school sites and funds to meet the needs of students in new development areas in a timely manner. OBJECTIVE: Provide school district personnel with current development forecasts so that they may plan and implement school building and/or allocation programs in a timely manner. THRESHOLD: The City shall annually provide the two local school districts with a 12 to 18 month development forecast and request an evaluation of their ability to accommodate the forecast and continuing growth. The Districts' replies should address the following: 1. Amount of current capacity now used or committed. 2. Ability to absorb forecast growth in affected facilities. 3. Evaluation of funding and' site avail abil i ty for projected new facilities. 4. Other relevant information the District(s) desire to communicate to the City and GMDC. The growth forecast and school district response letters shall be provided to the GMOC for inclusion in its review. IMPLEMENTATION MEASURE: Shoul d the GMDC determi ne that a potent ially seri ous problem exists with respect to. schools, it may adopt a fonnal "Statement of Concern" within its annual report. Such a "Statement" requires the City Council to consider the adoption of a resolution reflecting that concern during the public hearing on the GMOC's report, to be directed to the responsible public agency(s) with follow up to assure appropriate response by that agency. c-+ - _7_ ~\f?- - :~.:._~ .:- ~~~""= - - Cm' OF (HUlA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 29, 1997 > -~, -:~ ~., .' - President Cummings and Members of Board of Education ChuIa Vista Elementary School District . . 84 East J Street Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: City of Chula VISta Growth Management Oversight Commission 1996 Annual Report, Statement of Concern Dear President Cummings and members of the Board: On April 29, 1997, the Chula Vista City Council took fmal action on the 1996 Annual Report from its . Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) regarding compliance with the City's Quality of Life Threshold Standards. Based on written and oral presentations by school district staff, the GMOC's report contains an overview of the efforts by the two school district's to keep up with growth and the resulting effects on the children of Chula Vista. -- - Based on its review of the GMOC report, the City Council approved the issuance of a Statement of Concern to both school districts. The Statement of Concern regarding the Chula Vista Elementary School District is enclosed as Attachment' A'. Also enclosed is the City's Growth Management Threshold for schools, see Attachment "B'. The Statement of Concern and its recommendations should not be perceived as a criticism of the districts nor as an attempt by the City to tell the districts how to rim their organizations. The recommendations are instead an attempt to create a partnership between the districts and the City to foster dialog on these issues in the hope of reaching solutions. The intent of the Statement of Concern and its recommendations is to emphasize the need for a team approach to addressing the capacity issues in the two school districts. The converging trends and circumstances which have created overcrowded schools can not be solved by the school districts alone. The City urges the school districts to join with the City of Chula Vista and others in the community in a joint effort to solve the school's capacity problems so that the school ~tricts may concentrate on education. I inviie the two Boards of Education to meet with the Chula Vista City Council to discuss the feasibility of forming a task force to work together towards solutions. Sincerely, Shirley Horton Mayor -. cc: City Council, City Manager Attachments: A)Letter of Concern, B)Schools Threshold (sm<œan.ld) - C--s 276 FOURl 91910/(619) 691·5101 .__..___"__.,.__.__._"".__ ,__·'..m_~__··_·_ - A TT ACHMENT IIA" - LETTER OF CONCERN City of ChuIa Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission STATEMENT OF CONCERN REGARDING SCHOOLS [ChuIa VISta Elementary School District] The City recognizes the efforts of the Chula Vista Elementary School District to provide quality education in the face of severe capacity problems caused by: l. Continuing residential development in the expanding eastern portion of Chula Vista. 2. Demographic changes in western Chula Vista resulting in an increased student population despite limited residential development. 3. Higher than usual studentJhousehold ratios in some of the new communities in eastern Chula Vista. 4. Class size reductions in grades I through 3. 5. Changes in the residential build-out of large communities resulting in delayed openings of new schools in developing neighborhoods. I. CONCERNS: Despite the best efforts of the school district to accommodate the above factors, the City is concerned because many of the schools are operating above capacity. The City is further concerned that the measures the school district has been forced to take in order to accommodate the student population growth could possibly result in a reduction of the quality of education for students in the district. The decisions which the district has been compelled to make have resulted in the following circumstances: l. The elementary schools are operating at or above capacity.. 2. SixtY-five additional teaching stations were accommodated through relocatable classrooms this year (mostly for class size reductions, but some were for new growth). 3. Auxiliary teaching rooms (computer labs, resource rooms, libraries) have been reduced or eliminated to create additioual classroom space. 4. There has been a reduction in the physical size of the classrooms by partitioning classrooms, where possible, with moveable walls to reduce floor space from 900 square feet to 600 square feet (nùnimum 30 square feet per student). 6. There has been a doubling up of classes (40 students total) into those oversized rooms that can not be partitioned. - - - C ~& - .. 7. Some of the rooms converted to classrooms were not designed for classroom purposes and therefore these new 'classrooms": a. Have no windows that face directly outdoors. b. Have no direct access to the outdoors, thus requiring children to enter and exit these rooms through other classrooms. __ _ These are rooms in the newest five schools. _ - "" .... - - - . ..0. 8. One school (Mueller) is on a rnulti-track year-round schedule, one additional school is planned to be multi-track in the fall. Some schools are on year round single-track and one other school is on a split session schedule. In many instances, these special schedules directly impede the District's ability to better balance enrollment by shifting students from one school to another. The current conditions have the potential to reduce the quality of education for some of the students in the two districts. A reduction in the quality of education (in many cases driven by the need to physically accommodate enrollment), goes directly tò the educational"quality-of-life' at which the City's Threshold Standard is aimed. A perception (and in some cases, a reality) that an area's schools are overcrowded and that children will not be able to attend the neighborhood school can alter the perception of a neighborhood or community's overall quality-of-life. The school overcrowding issue is effectively a citywide issue, deserving of the City's interest and involvement. - -- II. RECOMMENDATIONS: The GMOC recommends the following: . - That the City CoUÌlcil, in cooperation with !he two school district boards, form a task force to look for solutions to both the SUHSD and CVESD districts' Capacity problems and to address other policy and management issues of mutual interest to the City and the districts on an on-going basis. One initial topic for the task force could be development of a campaign to educate the public about the need for passage of a school facilities construction and modernization bond measure. . That the City Council direct appropriate City staff to form a working/technical committee with the districts' planning staff to comprehensively examine phasing schedules in the context of reviewing a number of the major developments in eastern Chula Vista over the next year. Their fundamental charge should be to address the interdependent relationships of the projects relative to coordinating the timing for school construction to reduce the extent of interim housing and overcrowding. Œ-r¡ .; - _._,_..~-_.__..--_._._--_.__._._,----_..- - .. SCHOOlS - ~: To ensure that the Chula Vista City School District' and Sweetwater Union High School District have the necessary school sites and funds to meet the needs of students in new development areas in a timely manner. OBJECTIVE: Provide school district personnel with current development forecasts so that they may plan and implement school building and/or allocation programs in a timely manner. THRESHOLD: The City shall annually provide the two local school districts with a 12 to 18 month development forecast and request an evaluation of their abil ity to ~ccommodate the forecast and continuing growth. The Districts' replies should address the following: - 1. Amount of current capacity now used Dr committed. 2. Ability to absorb. forecast growth in affected facilities. 3. Evaluation of funding and' site avail abil i ty for projected new facilities. 4. Other relevant information the District(s) desire to communicate to the City and GHOt. The growth forecast and school district response letters shall be provided to the GHot for inclusion in its review. lHPLEHENTATION HEASURE: Shoul d the GHOC determine that .a potentially serious problem exi sts wi th respect to.schools, it may adopt a formal "Statement of Concern" within its annua 1 report. Such a "Statement" requi res the Ci ty Council to consi der the adoption of a resolution reflecting that concern during the public hearing on the GHOt' s report, to be directed to the respons i b 1 e pub 1 i c agency (s) wi th follow up to assure appropriate response by that agency. C -?; - - - - - f1.J ~C~I~- - ATTACHMENT A Chairman's Cover Memo GMOC 1996 Annual Report - ---------..- ----_._--------.------- APPENDICES Growth Management Oversight Commission 1996 Annual Report (April 1997) , (Appendix.doc) 1ft. "-' , APPENDIX A , Ilz CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 84 EAST "J" STREET . CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619 425-9600 EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH BOARD OF EDUCATION D rn©rnn\'§[§~' JOSEPIf D. CUMMINGS, PhD. February 21, 1997 SHARON GILES PATRICK A J.JIJO Mr. Ed Batchelder ÆB2 I 1997 PAMElA B. SMITH MIl<EASPEYÆR Senior Planner SUPERINTENDENT City ofChula Vista UBIA s. GIL. PhD. 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: Report to the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC)-1996 Threshold Standards Review Dear Ed, The Chula Vista Elementary School District estimates that it will need to accommodate an additional 650 students by December 1997, based upon an increasing enrollment trend: 3,5% increase in enrollment from 12/95 to 12/96 3.0%, 12/94-12/95 1.3%,12/93-12/94, and 1.7%,12/92-12/93. It is anticipated that well over 50% of growth will come from new students from residential units anticipated to generate .35 students per household in the eastern areas of the City, and .3 students per housing unit west ofI-805. Although district staff anticipate positive impacts on student learning from recently enacted class size reduction in grades one, two, and three, several steps have been necessary to address the shortage of classroom space throughout the district: purchase since 7/96 of65 classroom spaces in relocatable buildings, conversion of a second school (Lauderbach) ITom single track to multi-track year round in 7/97, . implementation of split session classes for primary grades at Feaster and Lauderbach schools, conversion of computer labs, libraries, staff lounges, and resource rooms to classrooms, repartitioning classrooms with moveable walls from 900 square feet to 600 square feet, doubling up two classes (40 students total) in oversize rooms, and use of rooms designed as teacher workrooms in newer schools as classrooms As of December 1996, 454 students had been bused to relieve overcrowding at schools whose capacity had been reàched. A four acre -. NIT 96-97/ENWGMOC /13 -....-..- ._...._______...__..n'__ I site at Feaster School has been purchased. Plans are underway to expand Feaster School once a funding source can be established. The following increases account for student projected from housing planned to close by December 1997: EastLake Greens 24% Rancho del Rey SP AB I, II, and III 37% Salt Creek I 7% Sunbow 21% Other 11% The Chula Vista Elementary School District plans to build its next school at the intersection of East J Street and Paseo Ranchero. Located across the street from Sweetwater Union High School District's newest middle school, tbis elementary school is scheduled to open :in July 1998 on a year-round calendar. It will accommodate new students from Rancho del Rey SPA III and Otay Ranch, as well as students from established neighborhoods east of the school. Until another school is built on East Palomar Drive, students from Sunbow will attend Rogers and Parkview Schools. EastLake Elementary is at maximum capacity. New students from Salt Creek I will be overflowed unless capacity can \. . be increased at EastLake. The district is working with developers to ~ establish full mitigation to address school provisions for Salt Creek and Otay Ranch projects. Thank you for the opportunity to provide insight into the Chula Vista Elementary School District's needs and conditions. Should you need further information, please call me (425-9600 x 322). Sincerely, - ~l7 , LB:csc . NIT 96-97/ENRlGMOC AJ./ . APPENDIX B , AS- _____.._____...._. ~.._......._ ____._.n_._ Sweetwater Union High School District ADMINISTRATION CENTER 1130 Fifth Avenue , Chula Vista, California 91911·2895 (619) 691-5500 Division of Planning and Facilities February 6, 1997 Mr. Ed Batchelder Senior Planner City of Chula Vista Plamúng Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Batchelder: Re: 1997 GMOC Report: SUHSD Enclosed please fmd the Sweetwater Union High School District's response to the City of ChuJa Vista GMOC growth forecast. It is presented in two parts. Part one responds to the impact projected growth will have on classroom space, and part two responds to the concerns raised by the GMOC in last year's fmal report as well as those requested in your January 7, 1997, letter to me. Feel free to call me at 691-5553 if you have any questions. S~~øß- , Thornas Silva Director of Plamúng Ts/ml enclosure ~, At, .-.....-...-- -~.._-,.- -- - -~- ----.---....-....-..--... -~._._.._-- --.----.-.-.---- .... _.__._~.__.- Part One: District's Response to Forecast Developrnent Introduction The Sweetwater Union High School District encompasses 155 square miles and includes five local governmental jurisdictions. Ten regular day schools are located in the City of Chula Vista. They include five high schools, one continuation high school, three middle schools and one junior high school. For the purpose of this response to the GMOC committee, an assessment of the potential impact to the continuation high school was not done since it is not based upon any particular school attendance area. Between the 1995/96 and 1996/97 school years, the district's enrollment increased by 1,191 students, a 4 percent increase. With the exception of Eastlake High School, all high schools are operating above capacity. Bonita Vista Middle School exceeded its total capacity by 151 students. The other middle and junior high schools are either at or below capacity. A total of 16,109 students, 52 percent of the district's total enrollment, attend schools located in the City of Chula Vista; 5,605 are middleljunior high school students, and 10,504 are high school students. The following table shows the student distribution and change in student enrollment from last year to this year. ENROTIMENT CHANGE BY YEAR 96 / 97 95 / 96 Enroll. School CBEDS CBEDS Increase -" Bonita Vista High 2,389 2,332 57 Castle Park High 2,291 2,154 137 ." Chula Vista High 2,150 2,093 57 Eastlake High 1,726 1,557 169 HUlton Hiah ~ 1..81.5. n High Sch. Subtotal 10,504 10,011 493 Bonita Vista Middle 1,645 1,549 96 Castle Park Middle 1,295 1,284 11 Chula Vista Junior 1,402 1,425 -23 HUlton Middle ~ 123.J. ~ I Middle Sch. Subtotal 5,605 5,491 113 C.V. Total 16,109 15,502 607 C.V. % of CBEDS Total 52.32 % 52.38 % N/A District CBEDS Total 30,787 29,596 1,191 . Bonita Vista Middle, Castle Park High, Chula Vista High and Eastlake High Schools have experienced significant gains in enrollment. Eastlake High School had an 11 percent increase; however, the school is only at 72 percent total capacity. There is classroom space for approximately 687 additional students. "-. ¡::J? SweetwaJer Union High School District GMOC Report Februory, 1997 Page 1 A. 12 - 18 Month Projections: Enrollment Forecast As in previous years' responses to the GMOC, the district determined the potential impact the "Final Pennit" 12 - 18 Month development forecast wouId have on schools and then distributed those impacts to each school site attendance area. It is important to note that, with the exception of Salt Creek Ranch, San Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch, all development proposals mitigated their impact to schools through participation in a community facilities district. A total of 580 new students shouId enter district schools after build-out of the 18 month projection. Bonita Vista High, Eastlake High and Bonita Vista Middle Schools will absorb 97 percent of this enrollment growth. The following table lists the projected student distribution by school. "Final Permit" 12 - 18 Month Enrollment Foreca.çt School 1st 6 Mos 2nd 6 Mos 3rd 6 Mos I21iI1 Bonita Vista High 34 31 .ft:2 'Va ~'? ,.. ~ Eastlake High 67 57 142 266 Castle Park High 0 0 2 2 Chula Vista High 0 4 3 7 Bonita Vista Middle 17 12 11 40 New Middle School in RDR 34 31 76 141 Chula Vista Junior 0 3 2 5 Castle Park Middle 1 0 1 2 Total . 153. 138 289 ~ Bonita Vista High and Bonita Vista Middle Schools have enrollments which exceed classroom space. The district has plans to construct two additional teaching stations at Bonita Vista High School during the 1997/98 school year and two more teaching stations in 1998/99. Additionally, the District will start a satellite middle school at Eastlake High School to serve two primary purposes: 1) to relieve the overcrowding at Bonita Vista Middle School by approximately 200 students, and 2) to get a "head start" on the new middle school class. This satellite school will start in the summer or fall of 1997. In summary, development in the eastern territories continues to impact district facilities, but the impact is temporary and manageable. , B. Three year trend analysis of the 12 - 18 Month Projections "This year the city requested that the district show the previous three year GMOC projections relative to their impact to schools. The following table identifies the anticipated change in enrollment. The actual CBEDS enrollment is also identified to show the comparison between the two data sources. /1/3 SweetwaJer Union High School District GMOC Report February, 1997 Page 2 -.-" -.--------.---.--.-- .. COMPARATJVE REVIEW OF ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS: FORECAST v CBEDS 3rd Prevo Actual 2nd Prevo Actual 1st. Prevo Actual Current GMOC Change in GMOC Change in GMOC Change in GMOC mE. CBEDS CBEDS CBEDS BVH 141 145 142 27 131 75 117 BVM 170 85 176 25 151 42 40 CPH 1 101 40 57 4 -20 2 CPM 1 -46 0 -23 3 37 2 CVH 12 -10 3 -19 7 32 7 CVJ 6 35 2 -16 4 15 5 EHS 180 64 189 240 144 207 266 HH 2 154 0 27 0 109 0 HM 1 -121 0 114 0 7 0 New Mid. N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A NIA 141 Sch. Total 514 407 552 432 444 504 580 This table shows that there is a parallel between the enrollment projection baSed on the GMOC forecast and the actual CBEDS count. This parallel is more evident if the lag time from fmal approval of a building to its actual occupancy by residents is taken into consideration. This lag time can take up to 12 months depending upon the economy and the region's ability to absorb housing units. Part Two:' District's Response to GMOC Concerns A. Issues identified in the 1995 GMOC Report: Issue: That the City encourage the new developer of the Salt Creek Ranch project (JM Development Co.) to promptly commence mitigation negotiations with the district. Response: J.M. Development has been working diligently with the district on a mitigation agreement. There has been significant progress. Issue: That the timing and the siting of a high school in Otay Ranch be accelerated to serve the Otay Ranch SPA I project. Response: The Baldwin Company has agreed to specific thresholds which trigger the siting "'- and delivery of a new high school which will serve Otay Ranch SPA I. At the present time, the district and Baldwin are working on the establishment of a Mello- Roos community facilities district which will serve the Ranch. California Terraces, a planned community on Otay Mesa, has received a copy of the draft community facilities district tax report and is also moving ahead with a similar agreement to serve their project in the City of San Diego. '- ,q? Sweetwater Union High School Disrrict GMOC Report February, 1997 Page 3 B. Issues identified for inclusion in the 1996 GMOC Report: - Issue: Staoo report of advancing of the high school in Otay Ranch SPA I. Response: Response noted above. Issue: StaOO of schools planning / phasing for the Salt Creek Ranch and San Miguel Ranch projects. Response: School fmancial planning for' the Salt Creek Ranch project is well under way; however, no progress has been made on the San Miguel Ranch project. Issue: Formulation of a standing task force to address school planning issues. Response: The District administration has not discussed this issue. . The division of planning has enjoyed an excellent working relationship with the development community and city staff and has not experienced significant problems in planning for new schools. Issue: Potential impacts and additional facility capacity needs as a result of mandated class size reduction. Response: The class size reduction program directly impacts the elementary school districts. Union high school districts are indirectly impacted in that the timing for the delivery of classrooms to schools is significantly delayed. What used to take six to eight weeks now takes six to eight months. Regardless of this timing problem, the district has developed a classroom construction program up to the 1998/99 school year. A copy of the board approved Building Needs summary sheet is enclosed to show how the District plans to meet its future demand for classroom space. . : ~ A/O SweelWaJer Union High Sclwol District GMOC Report February, 1997 Page 4 ~·'_I - r - , - - - '- : r '. ".. . BUILDING !'t"EEDS I .... . - - 1997-98 -1998-99 - ! .". . .. .- j ." ..... . . 1.- -:..... '. j' . -.. . , i . . .. :. I . , ; -- . . School 1997-98 1998-99 -' '. ......."- :Bonia v"", Ei;Ï1 S6oo1 1 Scie::.c.: 2 Cbs:s':-aac:s .'.~ ::. .:::~<..: '-. :::., Wit.!:.~c.:è:I.t:r=.a.~ . 1 CI.:usroo c:: wi:ca: !:OŒJ:.ùr¡ c:!=.::c ":::"::?T';: ~~~:..--~ ".. . : :-~:I..': .: ._.. ~. P:t..-!.:Hi;!t S¿'ool 1 Scie::.c: .~ 1 ~OC1 -- .,;;; 2 Cbs.srooz::.s -. . ç"ul:1 .."'" Ei;Ï1 S6oo1 1 ?åence 1 Cbs=om . Mu YJStI Ri:!t S¿'ool 2 CI:usroOI:J.S 2 CWsroo::s "." . 1 Fec.:ùe R~ot:l . .' '. ! "'Ioutgo"'.". Eig!1 S¿'ool 3 Cl::wirooc::s 1 C~OC1 . . . ! .... ::1-.' Sout!:.wert Eg]l SèooI 2 Sc!e:I.c: 1 C!z:srtlOC .. -- - . .. 3SAC . 2 Res;:-co:=.s -. .. .-' -.. '. Sou-Q~ JUJ:iar ~~;. Sèool ;3 Cla.ssro01:.S SS'eQ:U Eë.t:.=t:O:1 E1!top 'C';~ñ 56001 2~QC:S Tot:! 5 Sciee: 10 CI=:-ooc> llCIassrooJ::S 3 SAC .. - . 2 R~oc.s : , 1 Fe.....:lle Re:s-::-ooc. - Qt:::u:=::y '- Cl:1ssroo c. :_ S is,OOO XU S 8"'...5,000 Science S !!S,OCO üd: tI I:a...~ X2 S 4:0,000 S!.:\I,DOO Sic;!. X3 S iSO,OOO , .. SAC S liO,OOO Xl S iS,oOO X2 S 3!O,COO Re:strooc. S US,OOO X2 S !.:O,OOO Fe:::Ie Rc:s::-ooc S US,oOO Xl S US,OOO S1.í20,OOO 20o/ó - -,::-...-dic:p S.:4,OOO 199i-93 S;¡..!54.000 . -- 111/ . __ ____.._ __.__..__n__...__ . .._-~--_.".. ---_.~----_._-_. APPENDIX C , ~/~ MEMORANDUM " . DATE: December 17,1996 TO: Growth Management Oversight Commission VIA: John D. Goss, City Manager 9 FROM: James B. Hardiman, Fire Chief!~Ø-- SUBJECT: Fire Department Response Data: Fiscal Year 1995-96 This report serves to update the Commission on the pelformance of the Fire Department in responding to various emergencies in Chula Vista for the period July 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996. "- Emergency call volume for this period (6,682 increased by 3.1 % over the previous fiscal year (6,480). Threshold Comoliance Findings The current Fire Threshold Standard requires that 85% of all emergency fire and medical calls for service be responded to within seven minutes. For Fiscal Year 1995/96, the data collected indicates that the Chula Vista Fire Department responded to 75.2% of the emergency calls within 7 minutes (7:00). 85% of the calls were responded to in approximately 7:50. As in the previous year, this apparent non-compliance continues to result from statistical inconsistencies in the manner in which the present automated system records total call response time. This could be adding 20 to 60 seconds to overall response times per call. ProDosed Remedial Actions . It is suggested, as in previous discussions, that the installation of the Computer-Aided Dispatch system will offer significant assistance in collecting accurate times and streamlining the call intake and dispatch process, thereby providing a system to better measure pelformance and compliance. At present, staff is actively engaged in contract negotiations with a proposed CAD vendor and it is anticipated that the CAD system could be operational at this time next year. Response to Prior Year GMOC Recommendations/Focus Issues Fire Station Master Plan - It is anticipated that a consultant will be used to update the Plan. The City Manage'r's Office is in the process of reviewing proposals from potential consultants for this project planned for completion by Fiscal Year end. For your information, 2 maps are attached which depict the current and future fire station network with the relocation of Fire Station #4.lt is anticipated that the construction of this facility will begin in late 1997/early 1998. Chu/a Vista Fire Department ßJJ3 . n.__'~._.._..__ ..__.._._-~._--_. December 17, 1996 Page 2. --~ Separation of Code/No-Code Calls: The response time statistics referenced above reflect á trial period where the calls for service have been separated into two response mode categories: Code and No-Code. While this has given Fire Department and Dispatch staff a more refined picture of response to actual emergencies, various other operational and dispatch considerations have emerged and are still being evaluated. It is clear, however, that as we modify bookkeeping procedures to capture actual emergency response data, we move away from some basic assumptions which were completely germane to the formulation of the original standard in 1987. As we have discussed in the past, it will be important to use the new CAD system for a significant period to gather pristine data, unaffected by many of the human intervention opportunities we currently have in our manual dispatch and record keeping system. The clarity that this will bring to the discussion will be invaluable in determining an appropriate \NaY to set a standard against which performance can accurately be measured. Fire Department staff will be available for further discussion when the Commission reviews this standard in January. Impacts to EMS Call Volumes Stemming from Managed Health Care Reforms: With the -- advent of Managed Care, ·system" administrators anticipated that individuals in need of immediate (non-life threatening) medical attention who also subscribed to a health care program would be encouraged to by-pass the 911 system and contact their health care facility directly. In actual practice, however, the Chula Vista Fire Department is continuing to experience an increase in Call for Service volume, rising 9% in FY 94/95 and another 3.1 % in FY 95/96. The degree to which the Call Volume is impacted by managed care or population growth is not clear at this time. Recommendations It is recommended that the Fire Department continue with its present course of action, including: . Coordination with Finance and Police Departments for purchase of CAD system; . Coordination with the Planning Department in making revisions to the Fire Station Master Plan. . , Should you have any questions on this or other Fire Department issues, I can be reached at 691-5055. . . Chu/a Vista Are Department .4/4 A IT ACHMENT C LJ , - 8 , - I II -< Ü - . . II e -< 0.. 11 11 £ i >0 W II o!I a: .z: - u !J i o a: 1 ! a: ~"?·D ;:;;~'-: ,- -.' :::..,'~. <. .. .. :-',::< . C . o .:.: , CI._ .. '" , c1;j 0 , IJ t;;g ~ è'i) .! ~ §1 il¡~~ ! >< GI CD , 711 Hù D;:¡ , W .= Z u" 'I ¡,. :tu ¡ IL _! ~ ~ - " , 8 II .. -< - u I ~ .. - < Q. ~ .§ õ" ~ õ:. ¡ ,.. w ;. '" - .<: ..,,,, ~ ¡ "'0 0O! o~~ 1§ J~", : (1)UOO ~.........".................."...0......... .- i""·. Z~~ ~ C~...... o en .- C) (1) f = .... '" .. , " , ~.-.- , Iii! ìñ ~ ~ ~ ~I~:~ ð> ; I!! = 0 : ~dJ 5~ : .- 0 _ _ _ / (( {I' ::t t u.u. u; ~ ¡fØNIðu~ ct;1 )1& If;- 4~e'f7' CHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENT GENERAL STATISTICS BUDGET FY 1996-97 General Fund Budget $7,631,082 Number of Employees 89.8 FTE ORGANIZATION FTE Fire Suppression 79.0 Fire Prevention 6.0 Training 1.0 Administration 2.8 Disaster Preparedness 1.0 - BOARD SUPPORT , International Friendship Commission . 1996 EMERGENCY RESPONSES Medical Aid 5994 False Alarms 787 Fires 749 Citizen Assists 552 Hazardous Conditions· , 198 All Other 32 Total 8312 1996 FIRE LOSS $2,030,000 INSURANCE SERVICE OFFICE (ISo) RATING 3 FIRE INSPECTIONS PERFORMED 3,954 - a.L~... - --_."_.__._.,,,._~----_..._--,--,_._-_.- Total personnel: 169 Number of personnel on-duty per shift: 40 Number of Stations: 7 Number of Engines: 7 Engine Staffing: 4 personnel Number of Ladders: 2 Ladder Staffing: 4 personnel , Total calls for one year: 8,801 Fire - 1,205 EMS - 5,561 Total fire department budget: $9,884,000 , Fire loss for one year: $2,566,000 JCl/ß - EMT-Deiìbrillator Statistics I 1991 (6Mos.) 1992 1993 1994- 1995 1996 Total Total # of Calls 21 71 39 4-5 66 61 303 # Qualified Patients Treated 6 26 12 12 19 15 90 # of Saves 1 2 0 2 2 2 9 Qualified patients are those patients presenting in one of two heart rhythms, Ventricular Fibrillation or Ventricular Tachycardia. These patients are "shocked" (treated) with the machine. \ ~ "Saved" patients are those patients which when released from medical care possess normal mentation and physical abilities. This is the most conservative view of a machine save. , Chula Vista save percentage is 3%; County save percentage is 3%. , - r9/1 -..". --.--..-.--" Fire Loss Totals Year Buildings Contents Mobile Total 1989 810,000 300,00 183,000 1.3 Million 1990 1.7 Million 578,000 203,000 2.5 Million 1991 1.05 Million 424,000 203,000 1.7 Million 1992 1.3 Million 260,000 199,000 1.7 Million 1993 1.09 Million 626,000 246,000 1.9 Million 1994 1.96 Million 345,000 222,000 2.5 Million 1995 1.7 Million 693,000 298,000 2.7 Million 1996 1.14 Million 399,000 341,000 1.9 Million AveraQe 1.34 Million 453,000 237,000 2.03 Million 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 Buildings Contents Mobile Total -- ~ 1989 . 1990 . 1991 . 1992 . 1993 . 1994 . 1995 . 1996 J::J?I!) . INCIDENT RESPONSE REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 1996 NUMBER OF INCIDENTS BY AREA (As Dispatched by South Bay Dispatch) AREA # OF CALLS % OF TOTAL Chula Vista 8312 76% National City 219 2% Imperial Beach 1635 15% Bonita/Sunnyside F.PD. 648 6% Other 182 2% Total 10996 100% INCIDENTS IN CHULA VISTA TYPE INCIDENT # OF CALLS % OF TOTAL Emergency Medical 5994 72% False Alarms 787 9% Fires: Total 749 9% Structure 243 3% Grass, Trash, Misc. 283 3% Vehicle 223 3% Courtesy Calls 552 7% Hazardous Conditions 198 2% All Other 32 >1% Total 8312 100% INCIDENT RESPONSES BY FIRE COM~ANY STATION APPARATUS # OF CALLS MO. AVERAGE % OF TOTAL Station 1 Eng.21 2743 229 29% Station 5 Eng.25 2294 191 24% Station 3 Eng. 23 1422 119 15% Station 2 Eng.22 1360 113 14% Station 1 Truck 71 875 73 9% Station 4 Eng.24 596 50 6% Station 6 Eng. 26 298 25 3% TOTALS 9588 570 100% - Rescue 87 in Reserve from 7/1/95 /12/ --".....,_.~_....- ~ - --~._--,.,.._.... --- ---------~ ¡CODE VS. NO CODE CALLS CALENDAR YEAR 1996 1 CATEGORY CODE I NO CODE TOTAL 1-STRUC FIRE , 27 164 1371 2-STRUC FIRE 21 16 37 3-STRUC FIRE 17 21 38 4-STRUC FIRE 3 1 4 GRASS, TRAS 2051 78 283 FALSE ALARM 450 337 787 VEHICLE FIRE 2041 19 223 MEDICAL AID 5857 137 5994 HAZMAT 1181 80 198 COURTESY 1851 367 552 TOTALS I 7197: 1083 8280 \ - , - /122- APPENDIX D , /)23 ,~r:~~:~ ~ DATE : January 20, 1997 ' \11 'j \ TO : Growth Management Oversight Commission I VIA : John D. Goss, City ManaØ'. . _ FROM : Richard P. Emerson, Chief of Police V SUBJECT : Police Department 1996 Annual Threshold Compliance Review The Police Department is responsible for reporting two Quality-of-Life Threshold Standards to the GMOC. Each of these Threshold Standards includes two statistics: 1) proportion of calls for service (CFS) responded to within seven 7 minutes; and, 2) average response time of four minutes and thirty seconds. This report serves to update the Commission on the perfonnance of the Police Department for Fiscal Year 1995-96. Threshold Compliance Findin2s The first threshold measure is for Priority One (P 1) CFS. PI CFS include felony crimes in progress and known injury to persons or property. The current threshold standard for PI CFS requires that 84% of all PI CFS be responded to within seven minutes and that the average response time be four minutes and thirty seconds. For FY 1995-96, the PI CFS data collected indicates that the Police Department responded to: · 83% of all PI CFS within 7 minutes (7:00); and, · the average response time for all PI CFS was four minutes and forty six seconds (4:46). The second threshold measure is for Priority Two (P2) CFS. P2 CFS include misdemeanor crimes in progress, possibility of injury to persons or property, and emergency public services (i.e., traffic signal out). The current threshold standards for P2 CFS are that 62 % of all priority II CFS be responded to within seven minutes and that the average response time be seven minutes. For FY 1995-96, the P2 CFS data collected indicates that the Police Department responded to: · 64.5% of all Priority 2 CFS responded to within 7:00; and, · an average response time for all P2 CFS of 6:38. '-:----" CHUIA VISTA POUCE DEPARTMENT /lZ~ --..-.....-- ..._~_."'----_._._------,--_.. -"'----'-' GMOC Threshold Data for FY 1995-96 - Trends in Priority 1 CFS. These statistics have been tracked and reported since calendar year 1989. The annual numbers (see attached) show the roller-coaster nature of the calls for service statistics and the resultant response times. Despite the ups and downs of the annual figures, the overall increase from 62,396 in 1990 to 75,507 in 1995 produces an annual rate of approx. 2.7% equal to the annual compounded growth rate for the same period which is also 2.7 %. As mentioned previously, 83 % of Priority 1 CFS were responded to within seven minutes for FY 1996. During the same period the average response time for Priority 1 calls was four minutes forty-six seconds. Both are below the threshold standards. Over the years 1989 through 1995, the Police Department has responded to 84.7% of all Priority 1 calls within seven minutes. This is within the 84% threshold average, with exception of three years. The lowest response rate was in 1991 with an 81.7% rate. This was a result of the greatest growth in calls for service (+9.2 %) and the highest number of priority 1 CFS as a percentage of total calls (4.36%). One significant factor contributing to the up and down nature of these statistics is the fact that "genuine' priority one calls are consistently only 2 to 4 percent of our calls for service. As a result of the same percentage, a few out of compliance calls significantly alter the statistics. This is particularly true in the average response time statistics. One long call, such as a shooting where officers stage and setup before going on-scene, can drastically effect the overall statistics. During the same seven year period the department's average response time for Priority 1 calls has been four minutes thirty-five seconds. This is five seconds beyond the threshold. While there may be several factors that impact response times, the most significant factor is an increase in residential robbery and panic alarms in the east. In the time period from January to June 1995 the department handled 258 robbery alarms. For the same period of time in 1996, the department handled 346, an increase of 34.1%. Most of this increase in 211 alarms are residential and the majority are in the newly built homes in the Easktlake and Gtay Ranch areas. Additionally, 98 % of these CFS are false alarms. Often times response times for these CFS are long because a west end unit frequently has to respond because of the number of false alann CFS in the east. Proposed Remedial Actions , The Police Department plans to take the following steps: 1) Evaluate methods to reduce the 98 % false alann rate. 2) Review re-alignment of beats, or the addition of a unit in the eastern sector to address the increase volumes of alann CFS in the east. 3) Continue to review Co=unication Center Operational and Dispatch Procedures and make sure procedures are uniformly followed by the Co=unications Center and Patrol Division. ""- CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT ~ :z..S- _. Police Department FY 1995-96 Growth Management Oversight Committee Report P"Ii",3 As mentioned in previous years, the Police Department has made proactive community based policing a priority. Our approach has been that it is more effective to prevent crime before it occurs than to respond to calls for service. As a result calls for service reductions over the last few years are probably anributable to problems headed off by field officers through Community Oriented Policing and Problem Oriented Policing Projects. These problems are solved at the source and do not become CFS. Various other programs continue to also have a positive effect on CFS statistics: the School Resource Officer (SRO) Program, the Street Team, the Gang Unit, the Regional Auto Theft Task Force (RATI), the Sworn Staffing Overhire Program, and a variety of Volunteer Based Programming including the Citizens Adversity Support Team, the Police Activities League, the Senior Volunteer Patrol Program (SVPP) and the Overhire Program continues to enable the department to staff the Uniform. Patrol Division at a level that more closely approximates full-staffing. As a result of the proactive approach by the Police Department, the number of calls for service and crime rate has decreased. The number of CFS decreased from 72,507 in calendar year 95 to 69,935 in calendar year 96. The overall crime rate decreased by 16% from 1991 to 1995. Violent crime is down by 29% and property crime down by 14%. Additionally, the community policing strategies combined with the volunteer programs such as SVPP and CAST continue to enhance the quality of life for all Chula Vista. FOCUS ISSUE: Provide information regarding the èffectiveness of the Senior Volunteer Patrol Program and other community based, proactive policing efforts. The Senior Volunteer Patrol Program (SVPP) does not handle Priority 1 & 2 calls. However, indirectly, the SVPP has helped to increase the availability of officers on day watch. SVPP provides a variety of supplementary public safety and community services like vacation house checks, parking enforcement and license enforcement. More importantly, SVPP's visibility ill the community and contact with business owners has improved the "quality of life." There are currently a total of 89 SVPP members. SVPP activity reports indicate that SVPP is increasingly being called upon for service on a regular basis. We.. currently have two SVPP units on the 0700-100 shift, 2 SVPP units on the 1000-1600 shift and 2 SVPP units on the 1300-1900 shift. In addition to the mobile units, we have walking patrol three days a week from 1000-1600, this patrol walks 3rd ave. from E St. to G St and Broadway when available. In addition to the above mentioned programs, staff and the City Council have taken further action by approving various grant programs designed to further enhance officer effectiveness and "bridge" toward the future. In October 1996, Council approved four grant programs designed to work together to meet various law enforcement needs. The first grant program was the COPS Universal Hiring Grant which will add six patrol officers this fiscal year. This will allow the . department to expand the SRO Program by adding two SRO positions at the Elementary Level, CHUIA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT ,4z¿, "--. -----'. -- -.-.--...-..-.-..... ,...-.,.-.-------..--...---..-- -... ---..-...-- Police Department FY 1995-96 Growth Management Oversight Committee Report Page, 4 add two officers to the Street Team, one position to the Narcotics Task Force (NTF) and one position to handle special event planning. The second grant program was the State COPS funding which also helps fund the six new officers, equipment purchases, community based programs and the department's strategic plan. The third, grant program is the COPS Domestic Violence program which establishes a Family Protection Unit in collaboration with Children's Hospital. These funds combined with the State funding added a Sergeant, Administrative Office Assistant and Advocate to manage the program. The fourth and final grant is the Federal Local Law Enforcement Block Grant which funded a .5 Crime Prevention specialist, equipment and a grant writer. Based upon these new programs,. staff expects that response time data will continue to improve and that the Police Department will comply with all GMOC Quality-of-Life Threshold Standards during the next reporting period. Responses to GMOC Reco=endations and other FOCUS Issues: FOCUS ISSUE: Is it possible to evaluate threshold performance by beat area? The current CAD system does not have the ability at this time to evaluate threshold performance by beat area. The reason is that the beats split numerous "grids," and reporting districts. This will be corrected when the new CAD is in place. FOCUS ISSUE: Provide status update on funding, acquisition, installation and operation of the CADIRMS. Funding for PS U5 CADIMCT was approved by Council in the FY 96-97 CIP Budget. Since . then, staff has been in the process of negotiating an agreement with Unisys for implementation of PS-U5, the Public Safety Communications Project., Negotiations include the development of an acceptable Scope of Work, Contract, and other design documents. We are currently in the fInal stages of negotiations. Implementation of the project will take approximately 14 months from the date the contract is signed. Contingent on successful negotiations, staff anticipates that the fIrst phase will include the installation of mobile computer terminals and fIeld reporting in patrol vehicles. The second phase of the project will include installation of the "Life Line CAD" system and other related system interfaces. Installation of these systems will have a signifIcant impact on staff productivity and CFS data. In the event negotiations· fail, there may be a considerable delay in any technological improvements. Police and Administration are working together to negotiate an acceptable agreement and explore alternatives in the event negotiations were to fail. - CHUU VISTA POUCE DEPARTMENT ~Z? Police Department FY 1995-96 Growth Management Oversight Committee Report Page, 5 FOCUS ISSUE: Provide a work plan status update regarding review of Police facility master plans to co=ence in FY 1996-97. The effort would address the evaluation of future police service delivery system in eastern Chula Vista. The update to the Police facility master plan is to be addressed with the department's strategic plan. The department secured $25,000 in State COPS Grant funding for the purpose of developing a strategic plan to include police facility planning. Council approved the expenditure of these funds for this purpose in December 1996. The Police Department is requesting proposals from interested strategic planners. We estimate the strategic planning process will begin the last quarter of 1996-97~ Reco=endations: It is reco=ended that the Police Department continue with its present course of action, including: I) Implementation of CAD/MCT systems. 2) Development of a Strategic Plan and update of the Police Master Facility Plan. 3) Implementation of the grant programs to include hiring of 6 new· officers and expansion of programs such as the SRO program and the Street Team. 4) Evaluate strategies to decrease the number of false alarm CFS in the eastern sector. , cc: John D. Goss Sid W. Morris Ed Batchelder PD Staff Captains (3) Lieutenants (7) Sergeants (17) Mid-Managers (6) . - ~ CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT ,r::; Zß _ _..._.____".n.. -- - ------.....-..-- -- ---"-"-....,.'--.,..-- CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT CALL STATISTICS July 1995 through June 1996 Priority One Calls Month % w/in 5 min. % w/in 7 min. Avq. ResD. # call s % total July 71. 9% 85.6% 04:30 167 2.58% August 62.0% 79.9% 04:48 184 2.74% September 53.9% 76.0% 05:18 154 2.45% October 61.l% 85.4% 04:33 144 2.36% November 60.l% 83.3% 05:00 138 2.43% December 60.0% 83.0% 04:39 135 2.44% January 60.2% 80.4% 04:59 143 2.54% February 63.9% 85.4% 04:31 130 2.33% March 61. 8% 86.8% 04:36 144 2.42% April 62.0% 87.7% 04;28 179 3.23% May 58.2% 83.0% 04:54 194 3.30% June 60.l% 79.8% 04:53 203 3.49% Averages 61.3% 83.0% 04:46 160 2.69% , ,4z9 Call Statistics, Page 2 Priority Two Calls - July 1995 through June 1996 Month % wi in 5 min. % w/in 7 min. Ava. ResD. # calls % total July 40.1% 61.4% 06:40 1949 30.06% August 39.1% 62.9% 06:48 2060 30.66% September 41.1% 62.5% 07:25 1955 31.13% October 42.3% 63.6% 06:42 1983 32.50% November 44.4% 64.2% 06:36 1781 31.31% December 41.7% 62.7% 06;51 1680 30.34% January 47.8% 68.7% 06:08 1622 28.84% February 44.8% 66.3% 06:16 1680 30.17% March 46.0% 68.3% 06:23 1742 29.27% April 45.5% 67.5% 06:15 1633 29.44% May 39.9% 63.9% 06;48 1784 30.33% June 40.5% 62.3% 06:48 1874 32.19% Averages 42.8% 64.5% 06:38 1812 30.52% , '. . ¡::; 30 .··_____·._____"_.___.___'"·.m~__._ -.....--..--- . --.-- CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT CALL STATISICS January, 1989 through December, 1995 Priority One Calls Year % w/in 5 min. % w/in 7 min. Avq. Rest). # calls % total 1989 69.2% 86.0% 04:22 122 2.31%- 1990 69.8% 87.6% 04:13 152 2.92% 1991 64.2% 83.2% 04:41 164 2.90% 1992 59.6% 81.7% 04:57 267 4.36% 1993 65.6% 86.2% 04 :31 283 4.55% 1994 63.5% 84.H 04:40 237 3.82'" 1995 63.2'" 83.9% 04:41 168 2.79'" Averages 65.0'" 84.7% 04:35 199 3.38% Y'ID 1996 6l.1%- 83.6% 04:48 172 2.93% , . / Jl3/ POLICE PERFORMANCE STATISTICS - CALLS FOR SERVICE: 1989-1995 1989 63,300 Calls for Service (CFS) Overall Growth Rate: +1.8% 1990 62,396 Calls for Service (CFS) Overall Growth Rate: -1.5% 1991 67,421 Calls for Service (CFS) Overall Growth Rate: +8.1% 1992 73,601 Calls for Service (CFS) Overall Growth Rate: + 9_2% 1993 74,826 Calls for Service (CFS) Overall Growth Rate: +1.7% 1994 74,356 Calls for Service (CFS) Overall Growth Rate: -0.6% 1995 72,507 Calls for Service (CFS) Overall Growth Rate: -2.6% - - - - 1996--YEAR TO DATE 64,520 Calls for Service (CFS) (Thru 11-96) --LAST YR TO DATE: 66,970 Overall Growth Rate: -3.8% Estimated Call for Service for 1996 70,385 Overall Growth Rate: -3.0% - , ~ /1:1;;). ._.._~- -------- -.~._._~---- ----" , ~ _ J ~ ,.. \ J~ \ ,I 6;~", ,~, Iio> ~ ;;; I -...;: 0.. N ~ ~~ 6~ ! :: \ ( ~ - "¡",,E .". \ U;:¡ t;,." .. g ~ .. ~ ~ \ .., 13 I [[) \ .. "1 ~ .... N C") 'I [[) [[) [IJ \ .æB~Hfðððð I E ~ .~ .:01: ~.~ 11 ~ I en ,~.~ j~ ~ ~ ~ ~ </"~'I~III'~ . .. Il. I ~ æ ...... - w - .- ~ >~ N ~ ~ _ (1) ::::1m ~ .... o ~ 'I- == o 0 0 ~c.. ...... .- .. o \ \ -" ____)z ~ //3'3 APPENDIX E , /lgl( ç \-.J~ ' C(:. r~ . r;¡.:j; ('-. \. í,) ~- orv't" . ..,(. "Ñ.,\~\\....v ~\..¡>:\ Memorandum To: Growth Management Oversi~ Commission Via; John D. Goss, City Managerltf"i.J. From: David J. Palmer, Library DirectolJõf? Date: December 9, 1996 Subject: Compliance with Library Threshold Standard - July I, 1995- June30, 1996 I. THRESHOLD COMPLIANCE FINDINGS During this review period, July 1 1995 through June 30, 1996, the Library continued to meet the threshold requirement of 500 square feet of adequately equipped and staffed library facility per 1,000 population. Compliance was aclùeved in April 1995 with the opening of the South Chula Vista Library. II. IDENTIFICATION OF CURRENT RELEVANT ISSUES AND ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THRESHOLD COMPLIANCE The Library currently operates three branch libraries (Civic Cente¡¡lMain, South Chula Vista and EastLake) with a combined square footage of 102,000. Based on the mid 1996 State Department of Finance certified population of 153,200, the threshold would require 76,600 square feet of library facilities. Therefore, the current square footage exceeds this threshold requirement by 25,400. Even , considering the Planrùng Department's "worst case" population estimates, the Library will continue to be in compliance well into the 2000s. For example, If the population reaches 176,263 in 2000 and 199,573 in 2005, the threshold would only still require 88,132 square feet and 99,786 square feet respectively. TIûs past summer, the City Council approved a three year renewal of the agreement with the Sweetwater Union High School District to jointly operate the 10,000 square foot EastLake Library until August 1999. The decision to utilize the one acre donated site for a permanent library in EastLake was also offiåally postponed for two years. "'--...:..-- The Library continues to plan for the construction of a 29,000 square foot library to be built at the comer of H Street and Paseo Ranchero. This project is designed ,4gr ..-. .-.-.-.. _...- --.-........-..- to provIde service to the SweetwatedBonita Planning Area as called for in the Library Facilities Master Plan. This project would have been completed by 2001/02 if Proposition A, the Community and Branch Library Improvement Measure, had been approved by the voters this November.1 Unfortunately, the defeat of the quarter of a cent sales taX, coupled with the slow rate of Development Impact Fee accrual, means that this faciliry will probably not be constructed until the latter part of the decade. III. RESPONSE TO PRIOR YEAR GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS Last year the GMOC recommended that the City undertake a timely update of the. 1987 Library Facilities Master Plan. This update is now scheduled in the City's Capital Improvement Program for the first half of FY 1997-98. The GMOC also recommended that the staff ensure that interim and pennanent library siting issues be fully considered during the course of the EastLake Library , Master Plan re-evaluation effort, and the ongoing Otay Ranch planning efforts. TIüs, in effect, has been done. The decision regarding whether or not to accept one acre of land for future construction of a free standing EastLake Library has now been postponed by two years in order to allow for a thorough examination of the issues when the facilities master plan is revised next fall. The GMOC has also asked the Ubrary to monitor the impact of new teclmologies in order to determine whether or not the growth management threshold could be revised. Although many local residents may now access the Internet in the privacy of their homes, this trend has not resulted in a decrease in the number of reference questions answered at the library. The Internet has also not impacted the number of books being published in the United States. In fact, the development of the Internet and other new teclmologies has, if anything, placed greater demands by the public on the library. The final report to the City Counål on the SmartCommunity Project (July 9, 1996) describes how computer disenfranchised residents expect that thc:y will be able to get access to the Web and other electronic resources at telecenters, schools, and libraries. This demand is, of course, entirely consistent V'áth the role of the public library as the 'people's university.' To meet that demand, the Chula Vista Public Library will finally implement public access to the Internet late this winter. Considering this volatile environment, coupled with the library's continuing role as a community center, we continue to believe that more time is needed in order to tnùydetennine whether square footage requirements can or even should be changed. '¡County wide the measure received 59% of the vote. In Chula 'sta, 59.5% of the voters were willing to tax themselves for libraries. Tlús high level ofì support shows h / .,. strongly people feel about their public library. )93/' VI. PROPOSED ACTIONS/SUGGESTED RECOMMENDATIONS A:; disaJSSed, thefaålities master plan will be revised in early FY 1997-98 and will address many issues outlined. above. The regional Library Authority, which authorized the quarter of a cent sales taX initiative, sunset the week of December 9. However, before they went out of business they did vote to ask the County Board of Supervisors to recreate the authority and urged that the sales taX be once again put before the voters during the 1998 primary election. The authority members all felt that with a better organized and funded campaign, a five year library sales tax could receive the necessary two thirds vote. Approval of such a measure would raise approximately $19 million for the Chula Vista Public Library_ These dedicated funds would ensure that the Library continues to meet the service needs of the corrununity. At this point there is no indication of when the Board of Supervisors will take action on the Authority's recorrunendation. - ~- -~--~- -------- "------ -.- , ,19:19 APPENDIX F , /138 MEMORANDUM December 11, 1996 File No. 0790-80-KY-043 TO: Growth Management Oversight Commission VIA: John Go~. ŒY""",:9' ¡ FROM: John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Compliance with Threshold Standards for Sewers and Drainage, Fiscal Year 1995-96 This report serves to update the Commission on compliance with the threshold standards for sewers and drainage during Fiscal Year 1995-96 and also looks at future trends and developments. Sewers L Threshold Compliance Findin!ls Threshold standards for sanitary sewers have been met during Fiscal Year 1995-96. Development Impact Fees (DIF) have been established in the Telegraph Canyon and Salt Creek sewer basins to fmance new and relief facilities as needed to serve new developments. A facilities fmancing plan is currently being prepared for the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin. Existing facilities which require expansion or rehabilitation are identified through our sewer TV inspection and flow monitoring program. The construction of Phase VI of the Sewer Rehabilitation Program was completed during Fiscal Year 1995-96. This contract included the lining of2870 lineal feet and replacement of255 lineal feet of sewer mains and the rehabilitation or replacement of 10 manholes. / , The average daily flow of wastewater into the Metropolitan Sewerage System (Metro) during FY 1995-96 was approximately 11.4 million gallons per day (mgd). This includes 9.5 mgd of flows discharged directly to the Metro interceptor and 1.9 mgd of flows discharged through the Spring Valley Outfall sewer. This is a 1.4 percent increase over the projected flow given in the November 28, 1995 GMOC memorandum of 11.2 mgd, which.was based on flows during the first half of Fiscal Year 1995-96. Flows during the fust four months ofFY1996-97 have been an average of 11.7 mgd, including 9.7 mgd discharged directly to Metro and 2.0 mgd discharged to Spring Valley. This amounts to an '.-- annual increase of 4.4 percent. This is considerably higher than the City's long tenn rate of increase ,431 '"-""-.--.--.---- .__m.. --.--- --~-_..._. -~._.__.--.. .. --. .......-.---- ......_,.._....,.._,---_.,"--_._.,......,_._--~~-- GMOC -2- December 5, 1996 of 1.5 to 2.0 percent per year based on the number of new sewer connections. Beginning in Fiscal Year 1992-93, sewer flows showed little or no increase for several years. This trend appeared to be due to an increase in water conservation activities, use of low flow plumbing fixtures in new construction and a slower rate of new construction. It now appears that this trend has come to an end. Staffwill continue to monitor the rate at which the City's sewer flows change to assure that any significant increases will be noted early enough to avoid a shortage of capacity in the Metro system. The City's existing sewage capacity reservation in the Metro System is 19.2 mgd. This is more than sufficient to handle existing flows. Previous estimates indicated that the City would reach the capacity reservation with Metro by 2010. Based on our current rate of increase, the capacity limit would be reached during Fiscal Year 2008-09. The exact year that this limitation would be reached is difficult to predict, since it depends on the rate of development of major projects in Chula Vista, particularly Otay Ranch. II. Proposed Remedial Actions Since the San Diego Area Wastewater Management District was disbanded, the concept of eliminating ownership of sewer capacity in the regional treatment system has been abandoned. Chula Vista's capacity of 19.2 mgd in the Metro system, as established by the Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960 and subsequent amendments, will remain in force. There would therefore be three methods for acquiring additional sewage treatment capacity: , l. Purchasing Metro capacity from the City of San Diego 2. Purchasing Metro capacity from another Metro agency 3. Constructing a wastewater treatment! water reclamation facility, either independently or in association with other agencies The most immediate way to acquire additional capacity would be to purchase it from another Metro agency. The City of National City has excess capacity which would otherwise remain unused. We are currently in negotiations with National City to purchase capacity for three new large dischargers: the Water Park, the MCA Amphitheater and San Diego Gas and Electric. As mentioned in the November 28, 1995 report, construction of a water reclamation facility in the ,.q~¿) GMOC , December 5, 1996 -j- Otay Valley by the San Diego Metro System has been indefinitely postponed. A facility in this area could provide the capacity needed by the Otay Ranch and other developments in the eastern area of Chula Vista. The County of San Diego has indicated some interest in constructing a facility which could serve a portion of Chula Vista. The South Bay Water Reclamation Facility, which is currently under design by the City of San Diego, is not expected to provide either wastewater treatment or reclaimed water to the City of Chula Vista in the near future. Although it will tend to lessen the load on Point Lorna. III. Response to Prior Year GMOC Recommendations Last year's GMOC recommendations specified that an update be provided regarding the efforts of staff to develop a strategic plan to ensure sufficient future sewage treatment capacity to meet the City's long-term build-out needs. Such a plan requires the City to both safeguard existing capacity rights in the Metro System and to investigats: ways to expand existing capacity. The City's existing Metro agreement is valid until September 2003, and can be unilaterally extended by the City of Chula Vista for an additional ten years. San Diego, by letter agreement, dated November 25, 1996, has agreed to serve Chula Vista . until the year 2050. However, the City of San Diego is interested in having new agreements which would reflect the expanded Metro System developed by the end of 1997. It is important that such agreements protect existing capacity rights and provide for the acquisition of new capacity. Negotiations on these agreements commenced during Fiscal Year 1995-96. However, they did not progress too far due to the lack of information provided by San Diego. At the same time, AFFORD (an organization composed of most of the Metro agencies) was conducting an audit of Metro system costs and fmancing and negotiating with San Diego on various issues, including sale and acquisition of Metro sewer capacity. Staff felt that negotiations would be more productive after resolution had been reached on AFFORD's issues. Therefore, staff has been monitoring the progress of negotiations between the City of San Diego and AfFORD and has arranged to obtain results of the Metro audit. It appears that negotiations will soon be concluded. The City of San Diego has acknowledged existing capacity rights and the right of the Participating Agencies to sell capacity to each other. A regional capacity charge will be considered with respect to acquisition of additional Metro capacity from San Diego. -.... ,'- /J~/ "_.~~-~_.- -....,..... .-.-,.---. '---.-.--..--.- , GMOC -4- December S, 1996 Additionally, the City of San Diego will consider sale of up to 4.8 mgd of capacity in the South Bay Land and Ocean Outfall to any agency that may wish to purchase it. Such capacity might be needed for discharges from a treatment facility in the Otay Valley during winter months. The highest priority issue during Fiscal Year 1996-97 should be to pursue negotiations with the City of San Diego regarding the provisions of the Sewage Disposal Agreement. During the negotiation process the need to acquire treatment capacity independent of the Metro System should be clarified. ~ IV. Recommendations ~ ~~ It is recommended that the Public Works Department continue its negotiations with the City of ~ ""'- National City to acquire additional sewage capacity in the Metro System and commence ~ negotiations with the City of San Diego (both independently and with other agencies) with respect ~ to existing and future sewage capacity rights. - ~ Drainage L Threshold COmpliance Finding-s The Drainage Threshold Standard requires that new growth or development not cause storm water flows and volumes to exceed City Engineering Standards. The Engineering Division implements the Drainage Threshold Standard by requiring individual projects to provide improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. No· major problems can be attributed to new growth or development within the City during , calendar year 1996. One reason for this is that developers east of Interstate-80S have constructed detention basins, which are designed to impound the additional volume of runoff created by new development and to release that additional runoff at a controlled rate over an extended period of time such that lO-year, 50-year, and, in some cases, lOa-year pre-development peak flow rates are not increased. Another reason is that each new subdivision is required to construct drainage. facilities to handle storms of 10 to 100 year magnitudes, depending on the type of facility and size of drainage basin. Developers are also required to dedicate land and to construct drainage facilities necessary to serve their proposed developments. Drainage facilities benefitting an extensive area with multiple owners may be financed through the establishment of assessment districts lor development impact fees of the drainage basin underdeveloped. Further, - environmental impact reports and/or other environmental studies for major developments require /1/12 GMOC -5- December 5,1996 that any possible drainage problems on-site or off-site be mitigated when development occurs. The City's current (FY 1996/97) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes a project that will improve the Telegraph Canyon Channel between "K" Street/Country Club Drive and Sierra Way at an approximate cost of $1,400,000. This project is funded by the Telegraph Canyon Basin Development Impact Fee (DIF) and is scheduled for construction during the fIrst half of 1997. It should be noted that the Telegraph Canyon Basin DIP is a fee charged to new development east of Interstate~805 to correct the remaining deficiencies in the Telegraph Canyon Channel. The current CIP also includes three other projects that will correct major drainage channel deficiencies west of Interstate-80S. Two of these three projects will correct drainage defIciencies in the Central Basin. One of the Central Basin projects was planned to alleviate flooding problems from Second Avenue upstream to "H" Street at a cost of approximately $454,000. However, due to a problem with the acquisition of right of way for the project, staff is re-defming the scope of the project to allow completion of only the downstream portion of the work. The full amount for this project has been appropriated using Storm Drain Fee revenues, which are used primarily for storm drain maintenance and the development and implementation of storm water pollution prevention programs in compliance with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NODES) Municipal Storm Water Permit. Construction is. currently scheduled to co=ence in mid-1997, but is dependent upon dedication of drainage easements. The other project in the Central Basin will correct a drainage deficiency north of Del Mar Court, between Second Avenue and "G" Street at an estimated cost of $235,000 ($220,000 in Residential Construction Tax funds and $15,000 in Storm Drain Fee funds). Construction is scheduled to co=ence in mid-1997, but is also dependent upon dedication of drainage easements. The third· project is part of the reconstruction project for Main Street, between Industrial Boulevard and Broadway. This drainage facility will cost at least $750,000 and will be constructed with TransNet funds, which may only be used for the improvement of roadways and appurtenant facilities. Full construction funding for this project is currently scheduled for FY 1997-98. It must be noted that, with the exception of the Telegraph Canyon Channel project, none of the above-mentioned projects are needed for the correction of conditions created by development east of Interstate-80S, but are intended to correct drainage deficiencies west of Interstate-80S that existed prior to the implementation of basin-wide drainage studies and land development controls by the City. /I /ý.3 -...~---~..~- -".- GMOC -6- December 5, 1996 A list of seven future drainage projects that Engineering staff is proposing for inclusion in the FY 1996-97 to FY 2000-01 CIP is enclosed as Exlùbit "A". Exlùbit "A" also mcludes three additional priority drainage projects that should be undertaken as soon as the other seven priority . drainage projects are completed. Please note that Exlùbit "A" is somewhat different than the list of unfunded drainage deficiencies provided to the GMOC in last year's report. The list has been modified and updated to reflect additional data and analysis of storm drain performance over the past year. Because the City does not have a dedicated funding source for general drainage improvement projects, the projects listed in Exlùbit "A" will need to compete with other projects for scarce CIP funds. Possible funding sources include Community Development Block Grant, State Gas Tax, TransNet, Residential Construction Tax, Storm Drain Revenue Funds, and General Funds. It is not possible to identify which funding sources will be pursued for future projects at this time. A further issue that must be clarified is the impact of the newly passed Proposition 218 on this drainage fee. Because of the length of time this fee has been in place, it is believed that the City can continue its imposition without an election. However, a court action will determine whether this is the case. Also, any increase in the fee to provide specifically for the construction of drainage facilities will most likely be required to be submitted to the electorate for approval. II. Proposed Remedial Actions Drainage Threshold Standards have been satisfied with respect to new development in the City. Therefore, no remedial actions are necessary to correct drainage problems associated with new development. However, Engineering staff will contmue to pursue projects and funding sources to correct deficient drainage facilities west ofInterstate-805. ill. Response to Prior Year GMOC Recommendations In its 'prior year's report to the City Council, the GMOC recommended that the City Council approve the funding and installation of monitoring stations in the Telegraph Canyon and Poggi Canyon Channels east of Interstate-805. The GMOC further recommended that the City Council direct appropriate staff to undertake a proactive re-evaluation of potential funding sources for needed drainage improvements in western Chula Vista and report back to the City Council and '~ GMOC on prospects and proposed efforts to obtain these funds. These reco=endations were /l "1'1 GMOC -7- December 5, 1996 accepted by the City Council. With respect to the installation of monitoring stations, the City Council approved funding for the two monitoring stations in the FY 1996-97 CIP. These monitoring stations and the monitoring station in the Telegraph Canyon Channel at Fifth Avenue, which was approved in the FY 1995-96 CIP, will be installed and fully operational prior to the start of the 1997-98 stonn season. With respect to re-evaluation of funding sources for needed drainage improvements west of Interstate-805, Engineering staff has determined that federal and State funds are not available for the correction of remaining drainage deficiencies west of Interstate-805 since the remaining unfunded deficient drainage facilities serve relatively small drainage areas. The City has typically funded drainage improvement projects with Community Development Block Grant, State Gas Tax, TransNet, Residential Construction Tax, Stonn Drain Revenue Funds, and General Funds. The· only other possible source of funds is the creation of benefit assessment districts, which could be difficult to establish, particularly since the passage of Proposition 218. Under Proposition 218, establishment of a benefit assessment district would require that all property owners upstream of, and tributary to, a proposed drainage improvement project pay their "fair share" of the improvements, which would be based upon parcel size and impervious surface within each parcel. Engineering staff feels that it is unlikely that such assessments would be approved, given the fact that most property owners within a drainage basin are not directly affected by flooding caused by deficient drainage facilities. Further, unless certain provisions of Proposition 218 are successfully challenged in the courts by the California League of Cities, it is possible that a portion or all of the Stonn Drain Fee could be tenninated, which would make the funding of stonn drain improvements!west'of Interstate-805 even more difficult. As discussed above, Proposition 218 may even have a negative impact on the existing storm drain fee IV. Recommendations None. Enclosures: 1. Exhibit "A"( List of drainage projects proposed for 1996-2001 CIP's) 2. City of Chula Vista Sewer Basins Map 3. City ofChula Vista Drainage Basins Map M:\HOME\ENGINEERIGMOCREPT.96 ¡:}-¥S -_.--~.__.--..- . ..-...-- -.-----....--..... --.-,---.-...- ---~--~---'" " " " v " " N ~ ~ ~ - 0 ~ o 0 0"':1 "'0 "':7 ..... -- __ '" U IU 8 8 0 8 c: c: c: 8>8>- õr;: 8>-15" §- g.. -u.-u. -- -u.......... ~c:~c: 8·5 Õcp.,. Q... c.. >;>; >~ >-;.~ .r .~ u"uu"u u.~8. U.IU~ x "':I c: ~ = c: c _ ~ c: - c .- 8,.- c.. .- 0 -'= 8.æ If æ -:::I 0"':1 0 '1:1 ... U -:::I 0 ~ ~~~~ Mc..*~~§ g § IU &~&~ &~"'8.~~ ~ ~ õ' oCoC: o·-Q.,ocu u u ... ....-....- ...13c.....·-2 2 2 Q.. p.,.13c..~ c..~~c..~~ ~ ~ ""5 ÞÐ :;I co :;: ÞO u.. I: till ::J = c: c: ... cu.cLI. c ~...=u..o 0 0 ~= ~=~c ~g~~cu U U = rq :;: .g § .g ::I .g III § .g !! "g ] ~~ u..ou..u u.u'1:lu.u~a.a.s S§ ~È6:0.5 ~È~8.~È~::;~::::~:::; =~ '~a~a '~a ·~a~o,~o.~o o Lg IU 0 U 0 U 0 8 u 0 u >- u >- IU >- UL.:J CluOU OUc..CUOb..Ou.ou.. ~ ~ ª ª ª ª g '" - ~ ~ - - ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ <> ~;;~~f'!.. ~ - o ~ ~ £j~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ª ªª ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ - - - - - ~^ õ ~ ~8 ~ "'.J -0 N N 11'I ~ > ~ ~~ ~ ..... ~ ó:¿ ~ª~~a.~§5;§§a~a~g t.r:J - - 01 . - - - _ tlJ~':c ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ z~.~ 1: :;¡;;;¡ ;;;¡ ::¡ ~ o~ õ = ~I ~g;;~~§§~~ ~aa~~ ~ z~ < ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ::J U ~ > ~ z; ~ ~ ~ ¡¡..g; z~ ~ Š ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ª ª ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8- ¡...( ~¡:l.¡ §-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~:': >- ~ ~ ~ þoóoo( >< 0 ~ ~~;2 ~xªa¡;¡;~~ ~~~~8 r....., ::E :;;: ¡;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ""~ ;.."'::;¡ ::¡ ;:30 ~ CI)~ i~~ ª. ª. ª. ª. ~ ª. ª.ê. ê. ê. ê. ~ - - 0 0 0 ~ . 0 O~ ~ 8 0 ~ ~ .= v..., ~ \0 0 \0 -.:rr- 0 00 Q ~ - ~ ~ -.:r -.:r N N M~ _ -.:r ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - , ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 " ^ ~ > ~ ~ = .- ..... v v v ~ ~ u ~ ~ v ~< C _~ - w C ~.~ ~ ~ ':":: ._ u v.i 'E ~ ~ IX ¿ 0 G,I ._ VOoI)G,I 0 <0 >. >-. . . = ~ -~== ~ 8 .... ~ = v ~ 2 0 =~~~E ~ ~G,I ~ õ ~ Ar-u...>-.~oooo._=--:= C ~ ~5g~~g' ~s ~.~ ~ s ~ uE~ 2-0 ·c~:=~ .0::..:: "0 -< ~~c ~~·~-.5uccu o~ 0 = ~~~ ~u~u~~~~~ ;s : ~ .;~ C;;~~ 0-S: ~¡:Q v<~ ~= G,I ~G,I .=::;5¡:; t:..~sv.i>-.-5¡;'Oc fi:t ~ ~ ,~ ...... Õ. 'ë~u~ ~·ËE..§~ >, ci:i ~ ~ti5 ~S;:E ~~~:t"O~EuU <.5>-. > fi~ &::r-.... u~ti5~ ~s....~ E .§ ~ .a >-. E~ = 0 ~ ~ ~..... ~ 0 ~ ~ ~"8 .I. .I. ,a:¡ ~ ~ V.... ~~~a~~o~~ .~~N~ ~- ~ 0 B~ -C~.- u..c....c:;"._.....u u~ . .....~ __CalCUuuut:: <'01",= u'"Cuu u _= ·_~Ul.õu=c»o l.õl-o... ~ >~ ~ Eo ~ >~>~N'-'-Z~~'-~ ~:=·-c C .... . .J'.......N"'~......... "".......¡.t.,u- -....u u ~ - H...... .. ... c: c::I .0 .0 u ë; .. c: > ~ c: ...0 > > u 0 ¡:~~;Qfi£...o..ÇaZ;MU<~£g;..,< < ::'- . _...~ooO\ U"O ~ N ... C'" ~~~~cu:==~'3~!...-u~~s C .~~ ~ ~~ E~==~~~u~~E~o5 ~ ...= ~ o.os~_==.o~O~bt:..~.or-t:.. ~ .o~ '" . :::: ..,.. ==:::;-NC""\-.:r~<c::Ir-ooO\o -c,sz \D \D - ... - £)~'ú1 APPENDIX G , A-Y1 2'-07-1997 12,48Pt· mar· ENGINEERING DTAY WD 619 670 8920 P.2 ( ...c[)edicoted to Con\l>IUnl!y SeMee zss..c SWEETV~R Sl"'RlfiGS BOVL~A.RD. SPRING VALlEY, <:,At ~Nl4 rll1tT1'.7299 TELEPHONE:; 6'10.2221, .&.REA CODE 619 W,O. 2980 Mr_ Ed Batchelder senior Planner Growth Management Oversight commission city of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Subject: City of Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight commission (GMOC) 1996 Water Threshold standards Review Dear Mr. Batchelder: The following is a report on the status of the 1996 water Thresholds for Otay Water District (OWD) . The OWD continues to assure a high quality, reliable water supply through the planning, design and construction of water facilities, as well as close coordination with the City of Chula Vista, Sweetwater Authority, Helix Water District, city of San Diego and San Diego - County Water Authority. The projected water demand in chula Vista is expected to continue to increase at a moderate rate (approximately 3 percent per year) with new meter sets averaging about 1000 per year- for the next five years. The meter sales between July 1995 and June 1996 (FY 95-96) were 812, versus the prior 12 months sales of 997, and current meter sales are on track with a projected 975 for FY 96- 97. 1 - . County and The overall outlook for water supply in the State, City of Chula Vista for the next 12-18 months is excellent. The long term picture-is also very positive and capable of supporting chula vista's long term growth. This outlook has been achieved through the cooperative efforts of all agencies involved in' providing water to Chula vista and particularly the coordination efforts of Chula vista, otay Water District, Sweetwater Authority and the City of San Diego. The OWD is actively developing local water supplies such as wells, recharge, desalination, and the sharing of treatment plant and storage capacity with other agencies such as Sweetwater Authority, Helix water District and ·the City of San Diego. To increase local water supplies the OWD is evaluating a well. located at Rancho del Rey _parkway and Terra Nova Drive, which was ~- developed in April 1991 by McMillin companies for grading water. )1./13 .- .._..___._,.._h._,..__._._ .---.. 2-07-1997 12, <19PI·l FROt·j ENGINEERING CTAY WD 619 670 8920 P.3 Mr. Ed Batchelder Growth Management oversight commission city of Chula Vista February 7, 1996 Page 2 since grading activities have been completed, McMillin has no further use for the well. O\-1D, through a treatment process, can use this well as a source of local water supply. The well will be capable of 315 gpm of potable quality water to be added to our potable distribution system. The availability of water in an emergency is being addressed by Metropolitan Water District (MHD) , San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) and Otay Water District (OWD) . OWD's need for a ten day water supply during a SDCWA shutdown has been fully addressed in OWD's Water Resources Master Plan. The OWD is currently able to meet this requirement through its own storage and existing interconnections with other agencies. MWD, SDCWA, and OWD all have programs to continue to meet or exceed the emergency water needs of the region into the foreseeable future. The OWD, in concert with the city of Chula Vista, continues to expand the use of recycled water. Chula vista and OWD are both evaluating opportunities to create more recycled water, and the city of San Diego is evaluating the construction of its South Bay Treatment Plant by the year 2000. Recycled water from these facilities will be available for distribution by OWD. - The District continues to encourage water conservation through; a school education program and penalties on excessive use of water for irrigation_ The education program includes school site garden grants, treatment plant tours and classroom programs for elementary schools, as well as science fair participation for elementary and junior high school levels. There is water quality testing certification availability for the senior high levels and a video lending library for all school grade levels. The OWD school education program has been enthusiastically received by the school community, and twelve schools in Chula Vista are participating. , The following paragraphs provide more detail about each of the threshold areas summarized above. . PLANNING THE WATER SYSTEM On June 5, 1996 the OWD Board adopted the Water Resources Master Plan (WRMP) prepared by Montgomery Watson and the Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) for the WRMP. The basis of the new Master Plan is the population growth projections from SANDAG's most recent forecast, designated as the Interim Series 8 Regional Growth Forecast, Water and Sewer Agencies and input from the city of Chula vista, and developers. It has incorporated the concepts of water storage and supply from neighboring water agencies to meet operational and emergency water supply. OWD - , worked closely with the city of chula vista staff in finalizing ;:J /{ f 2-07-1897 12, 5ØPt·j n~Ot·1 ENGINEERING DTAY WD 619 670 8920 P.A Mr. Ed Batchelder Growth Management Oversight commission City of Chula vista February 7, 1996 Page 3 the WRMP and MEIR and coordinating the otay Ranch development activities. The process of planning followed by the OWD is to use the Master Plan as a guide and to revisit each year the best alternatives for providing a reliable water supply. The Master Plan is also revised every five years through an in-depth review. This year although SANDAG's forecast is for a six percent growth rate, OWD has projected a three percent growth rate based on the historical trends and discussions with developers. WATER SUPPLY The short term and long term water supply is expected to meet the projected water demand in Chula Vista without any restrictions for the following reas9ns. The significant rain and snow California received last year in conjunction with the most recent precipitation events in the state have resulted in many reservoirs, both State-wide and local reservoirs, to beat higher than normal levels. Therefore, the water outlook for the next 12-18 months is that there will be no ~. restriction on the water supply as reported by SDCWA and MWD. The long-range prognosis is also very favorable in that the MWD has adopted an Integrated Resources plan which includes six new implementation policies. These pOlicies are as follows: · Reliability: Through the implementation of the Integrated Resources Plan, MWD and its member agencies will have full capability to meet full service demands at the retail levels at all times. · Balance: MWD shall demonstrate ~tewardship by maintaining a resource mix which balances investments and additional improved imported supply capability with investments to assure leadership in local resource development and conservation. · Competitiveness: MWD shall provide affordable water service and will maintain its competitiveness by assuring that the effective rate for MWD will be less than $500 per acre-foot in the year 2005. · Eastside Reservoir: MWD affirms its commitment to complete the 800,000 acre-feet Eastside Reservoir Project with water deliveries to storage commencing in the year 2000. - ¡:} 5"0 "- ,-~-,_._._.. ..--- ,--,,-_._.~--- 2-07-1997 12,50P~1 FROM ENGINEERING OïAY WO 619 670 8920 P.5 , Mr. Ed Batchelder Growth Management Oversight Commission City of Chula vista February 7, 1996 Page 4 . Colorado River Aqueduct: }rno will take all necessary access to assure that the Colorado River Aqueduct will be operated at capacity for the benefit of all member agencies. . Adaptabil i tv: MWD commits to a resource development and financial strategy that is flexible and will provide acceptable water quality and financial security for MWD and its member agencies_ To achieve this goal, the ffi'D is investing in recharge projects, desalination, funding of recycled water and other new water sources. On the regional front, the SDCWA and individual agencies are discussing the potential exchange of water between agencies and , "wheeling" of vlater by SDCWA_ This will further increase the reliability of the long term water supply as this allows for the more effective use of regionally available water. SDCWA continues studying the feasibility of bringing Imperial Irrigation District (IID) water to San Diego. The SDCWA is seeking up to 400,000 acre-feet of water annually for at least 50 to 100 years, through a water conservation and transfer agreement with IID. This would further improve the long term reliability -- of water supply. The SDCWA construction of Pipeline No. 4 is expected to be in operation in April 1997. This pipeline will substantially increase the capacity of the treated water delivery system to OWD. Additional reliability will be achieved by having both a treated water and raw water pipeline coming to the South County. The OWD has adopted revisions to our Code of Ordinances, which allows for customers to utilize and be assured a highly reliable water supply. This is available becquse the MWD and SDCWA have committed to provide a water supply from alternative available sources such as farmers and other member agencies. Also, on the local level, the OWD is developing local interconnections. local water supplies, wells. and recycled water. Two potential areas of concern are the Arizona Water Banking and the Bay-Delta. The State of Arizona. has implemented a new "Water Bank" to store much of their unused allotment (260,000 acre-feet) of Colorado River water in aquifers. This action limits California utilizing Arizona's unused allotment andMWD·will have to find alternative sources. The MWD believes that Arizona's "Water Bank" will not have an imroediate impact on Californians for at least two or three years. ,195/ 2-07-1997 12,51P~· FRŒ· ENGINEERING OTAY WD 619 670 8920 P.6 Hr. Ed Batchelder G=owth Management oversight commission city of Chula Vista February 7, 1996 Page 5 The Bay-Delta issue on the other hand is headed towards a solution. California and federal cooperation has formalized a CalFed Bay-Delta Program with signing of a Framework Agreement. The Framework Agreement projected that the State and Federal Agencies would work together in the following areas of Bay-Delta Estuary Management: · Water quality standards formulation; · Coordination of state Water Project and Central Valley project operations with regulatory requirements; and · Long-term solutions to problems in the Bay-Delta Estuary. state - Federal process is to develop long-term solutions to problems in the Bay-Delta Estuary related to fish and wildlife, water supply reliability, natural disasters and water supply. The intent is to develop a comprehensive and balanced plan, which addresses all of the resource problems. LOCAL WATER SUPPLY i As part of OWD's long term plans to assure the reliability of I. water supply, We are developing an Integrated ~esource Planning \- (IRP). The OWD's IRP has established a goal of obtaining 40% of its water supply locally when SDCWA aqueducts arc out of service, and 70% from local reservoir storage when SDCWA aqueducts are available to replenish the local reservoirs. The IRP considers development of wells, recharge, desalination, local treatment plants, local storage, recycled water, raw water and conservation. To date the OWD has completed studies on several wells and the feasibility of a recharge project. Two wells were drilled by Mainstream Water Development, Inc. at no cost to the District in return for a commitment to purchase tQe water. Unfortunately these wells were low producing and not put into production. The OWD completed a joint venture with Sweetwater Authority (SWA) investigating a well site on Otay Valley Road. This also was a low producer. The District is currently evaluating purchasing a well from McMillin Companies, with a known production level of 315 gpm. The water from this well requires extensive treatment, but results in a ten year return of $1.2 million dollars. This benefit is primarily achieved by avoiding construction of covered reservoirs. This will be the first well the District will integrate into its water system. The OWD has been negotiating with the city of san Diego, Sweetwater Authority and Helix water District for treatment plant capacity and lake storage. All have indicated they are willing ~ to enter into agreements pending Board and Council approvals.. At ¡:} 5' ¿;{ ---.'-"-'--'..'-'-..--'. ._--_..._----~-_._-_.- 2-07-1997 12oS1PN FRON ENGINEERING OTAY WD 619 670 8920 P. 7 Mr. Ed Batchelder , Growth Management Oversight commission city of Chula vista February 7, 1996 Page 6 this time SDCWA has finalized an agreement with Helix water District which will guarantee Otay 8 MGD from the Helix plant. The District is negotiating on increasing this to 16 MGD for use during a SDCWA shutdown. OWD is currently designing and starting to construct several , projects that will increase the use of recycled water. one consists of lining and covering a recycled water pond that will improve the recycled water quality and quantity. . The second project is the extension of several pipelines to open up new areas for use of recycled water. Otay is also working closely with the. City of San Diego and the city of Chula vista on obtaining recyclèd water from the South Bay Treatment Plant. We are also evaluating the potential use of raw water in the recycled system. The OWD continues to have a water Conservation Program Ordinance to reduce the quantity of water used by customers for the purpose , of conserving water supplies. The program actually provides a water "budget", thereby requiring irrigation efficiency by water accounts dedicated solely to the irrigation of landscaping. A study suggested that if over users could be encouraged to manage their landscape with a maximum annual amount of 48-inches of - water, approximately 1,000 acre-feet of water would be saved annually. Conservation is also promoted by the education of the pUblic through its school programs that include twelve schools in Chula vista and nineteen others throughout the District. The District is also currently working with Helix Water District and cuyamaca College in the design and possible construction of an "Educational Conservation Garden." EMERGENCY WATER SUPPLY , The need for an emergency water supply is based on providing for events that may interrupt the water supply for six months (MWD) , three months (SDCWA) and 10 days (OWD) . The MWD is constructing the Eastside Reservoir (formerly known as Domenigoni Reservoir) to provide six months of storage in case of an interruption of their raw water supply. The MWD reports that the Eastside Reservoir construction progress is on schedule. Significant construction contracts have been let for the construction. The planned schedule to begin' placing water into storage is in the year 2000 with an estimate of four years to complete the filling operation_ SDCWA continues with their efforts to provide for emergency storage for three months needs for delivery to their member agencies in the event of supply outages from MWD deliveries. - /153 2-07-1997 12,S2Pt·j FROt·j EI~GINEERING OTAY WD 619 670 8920 P.8 Hr. Ed Batchelder Growth Management oversight Commission \ city of Chula vista February 7, 1996 Page 7 SDCWA has finaled the ErR for their Emergency Storage Project (ESP). SDCWA now has approved a new combined reservoir in Olivenhain with La~e Hodges improvements and' an expanded San Vicente Reservoir. This project provides for the emergency storage needs of the member agencies by adding 90,100 acre feet· of reservoir storage within the county dedicated to use during emergencies. Combined with storage already dedicated for emergency use, the additional capacity would meet the County's projected emergency needs through the year 2030. SDCWA is also working with the City of San Diego to develop an agreement to provide SDCWA storage in City lakes. OWD has a policy to be able to meet a 10 day outage of SDCWA system by having a maximum of five average day's demand in storage and a minimum of five average day's demand from other sources. The OWD has a number of interconnections with other agencies to assist during aquEduct shutdowns. The OWD has effectively managed ten days of SDCWA planned and emergency shutdowns in the-past, and through its Water Master Plan, has established a program to address future shutdowns of the SOCWA aqueduct. OWD has also evaluated the abillty to withstand various ten day outages without adding terminal storage reservoirs or interconnections beyond those that exist today. The conclusion of the evaluation is that OWO can withstand an emergency ten day outage without any new terminal storage reservoirs or interconnections being built until after the year 2007. The maximum of five average days in storage continues to be developed with completion of a major 30 MG terminal reservoir adjacent to EastLake Parkway, known as the EastLake Greens Reservoir. This reservoir has two independent 15 MG cells and is in operation. Also, OWD has under design a project to link storage from its Roll Reservoir in th~ south to the 30 MG EastLake Greens Reservoir in the Central Area. This project will deliver 20 MGD to the central Area in an emergency and perhaps as a normal supply from the Lower Otay Reservoir Complex Facilities. OWD Staff continues to aggressively negotiate alternative water sources in an expedient fashion, to assure we stay ahead of the projected growth in demand. OWD negotiations with the city of San Diego for Lower Otay Reservoir/Treatment capacity for the central and southern portions of the OWD, are in progress as are discussion with Sweetwater Authority. RECYCLED WATER On the recycled water front, OWO continues to actively pursue the .'-.-- development of recycled water facilities within new development ,q. .s- "I . ,.-.,--..-..--.--,..---.- .-._-~---- 2-07-1 997 1 2 ,53PI·j FROt·j ENGINEERING GTAY WD 619 670 B920 P.9 Mr.. Ed Batchelder Growth Management Oversigh~ Commission City of Chula Vista Febx:uary 7, 1996 Page 8 projects. The OWD is fully supportive of the construction of an advanced wastewater treatment plant in the Otay River Valley which would provide recycled water for newly built distribution facilities. The city of san Diego is evaluating the construction of the South Bay Water'Reclamation Plant_ The current projected date of implementation is around the year 2000. The city of San Diego has identified the Otay Water District as a potential market for recycled water from the South Bay Plant. OWD has expressed our interest. in receiving recycled water from this plant and related joint use of storage and pipeline facilities that benefit the city and OWD. The OWD completed a study of the wastewater and the water reclamation program which evaluated future expansion of the Ralph w. Chapman Water Recycling Facility (RWCWRF) . Future expansion of this facility will be driven by the market for recycled water. As additional recycled water demand is needed beyond current treatment capacity, the RWCWRF may be expanded. The future recycled water supply for new markets is well positioned to meet the increasing demands. These efforts have been closely coordinated with the City of Chula Vista, Sweetwater Authority and the City of San Diego recycling plans for the Otay River Valley Plant and the South Bay Plant. INTERAGENCY COOPERATION Representatives from Sweetwater Authority, Chula Vista city Council and OWD have continued to meet (Chula vista Interagency Meetings) during the past year to address issues of joint concern as well as keep the City informed regarding state-wide water issues which may impact development within Chula Vista. These coordination meetings include: Sweetwater Authority;otay Water District Board Members and Chula vista representatives. Quarterly meetings of SWA and OWD Chief Engineers and Chula vista Director of Public Works are also held. There have been significant accomplishments in the coordination efforts of the four agencies. Some examples are: 1. The OWD and the City of Chula Vista entered into an agreement designating otay Water District as the water purveyor within the City of Chula vista. 2. The shared resources agreement executed between Sweetwater Authority and OWD has been implemented such as sharing of heavy equipment. The agreement has been expanded to include Helix Water District, Padre Dam, Lakeside and Riverview Water Districts. The City of Chula Vista has also expressed interest in developing a shared resources agreement. - ¡::¡ ~S' 2-07-1897 12,S<1Pt·l FROt·j ENGINEERING OTAY ViD 619 670 8920 P.10 Mr. Ed Batchelder Growth Management Oversight Commission city of Chula Vista February 7, 1996 Page 9 3. Coordination with Chula vista on its Sphere of Influence Study and related EIR as well as close coordination and joint planning of water facilities to serve the planned Otay Ranch SPA One Development. 4_ Sweetwater Authority and OWD are jointly investigating opportunities to develop local water supplies and share water resources. These include such projects as: The San Diego Formation Investigation, the Middle Sweetwater River Study, and evaluation of multiple interconnections. , 5. Chula Vista, Sweetwater Authority, and OWD are sharing information and data needed to develop Geographical Information Systems that will enhance the operations of all the agencies. 6. OWD continues to assist Chula Vista with its sewer billings. HIGHLIGHTS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT'S OPERATION The following are a few highlights of the 1995-1996 accomplishments by OWD. 1. No water rate increases associated with owD operations. 2. No capacity fee increases. 3. $12.0 million in capital improvements designed and/or constructed. 4. Installed and inspected approximately 79,733 feet of pipelines. 5. Developers installed approximately.$4.S million in pipelines. 6. Delivered approximately 21,797 acre-feet of water. 7. Delivered approximately 822 acre-feet of recycled water. S. During the period between July 1995 to June 1996 Otay sold 812 meters. In summary, the water supply outlook is excellent and the City of Chula vista's long term growth will be assured of a reliable water supply_ Potential interruptions to the water supply have been addressed by OWD, SDCWA and MWD through the long term emergency water supply development of the SDCWA's Emergency storage Project (90 days), the MWD Eastside Reservoir (six __ months) and OWD's ten day storage plan. The continued close ,.q S-t, _...M___.__.______.__~.._ _ +.'___+___.'.' 2-07-1997 12,5~PM FRat·1 ENGINEERING QïAY VlD 619 670 8920 P.l1 Mr. Ed Batchelder Growth Management Oversight Co~mission City of Chula Vista , February 7, 1996 Page 10 coordination efforts with Chula Vista and the other agencies have brought forth significant enhancements for the effective utilization of the regions water supply to the benefit of all citizens. The OWD will attend the February 13, 1997 meeting and make a brief presentation as requested. We will need an overhead projector for our presentation. Very truly yours, Timo "N. Stanton De rtment Head gineering and Planning TNS/JFP: jkp cc: Keith Lewinger Jim Peasley P:\WQRKJIQMI02'NOICV...GMOC:Z DOC "- , - It S-7 APPENDIX H , ~ .s-S' SWEETWATER AUTHORITY 505 GARRETT AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 2328 CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91912-2328 (619) 420-1413 GOVERNING SOARD FAX (619) 425-7469 GEORGE H. WATERS. CHAIRMAN MARGARET COOK WELSH, VICE CHAIR JAMES F. OOUD. SR. m © m D'V:!J ~ \ t\¡: SUE JARRETT BUD POCKlINGTON JAMES S. WOLNIEWICZ ~¡ l'~1 GARY F. WRIGHT !u\\L JI\N 3 11991 i~ WANDA AVERY TREASURER DIAN J. REEVES SECRETARY Mr. Ed Batchelder, Senior Planner " City of Chula Vista Planning Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Subject: 1996 GMOC REPORT - SERVICE AVAILABILITY STATUS Dear Mr. Batchelder: This is in response to your request letter dated January 7, 1997 to provide an evaluation of Sweetwater Authority's ability to accommodate forecasted growth considering both short and long-term perspectives. The San Diego County Water Authority and Metropolitan Water District continue their -- efforts to improve the reliability of the region's water supply system and its ability to weather a repeat of the 1991 drought situation. Metropolitan Water District has acquired a large reservoir site in the Domenigoni Valley in Riverside County for the construction of Eastside Reservoir to store excess water during periods of plentiful supply to the San Diego region. This will provide for drought or other emergencies, such as earthquakes. Construction of the second pipeline (Pipeline 4E) by the San Diego County Water Authority to serve the South Bay should be completed and operational by the end of this year. This will provide the necessary redundancy to minimize interruptions of water supply as a result of planned or unplanned shutdowns of a one-supply pipeline system. , Partly as a result of the establishment of the Chula Vista Interagency Task Force, Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District have developed an ad hoc committee to coordinate each agency's water supply and service activities in Chula Vista. As of December 31, 1996, Sweetwater Authority had approximately 24,000 acre-feet of water in storage combined at Loveland and Sweetwater Reservoirs. This amount of water is equivalent to over one year of imported water supply. A portion of the stored water at Loveland Reservoir will be transferred to Sweetwater Reservoir to benefit the use of local water. Sweetwater Authority will need to purchase imported water this year, beginning in the late summer, from the San Diego County Water Authority for some of its supplies depending on how much rain is received locally. This does not mean that there will not - )95'1 A Public Agency, ,,"a.n!Î-1::111,.NntioT1_aJ. Cit!).L.E.k.L:z.. "tl; ....+ri ..a.-a..d..~B"",~·u.~...d.i..n..tt----1i~___._____.__ +-----_.._..._~._--_._.,.- Mr. Ed Batchelder Re: 1996 GMOC Report - Service Availability Status January 29,1997 page two be sufficient water to meet local needs. It does mean that a portion of the water we use will be imported instead of local. The expected delivery to consumers for 1997 is 22,000 acre-feet for the 12 month period. This represents a slight increase from the consumption during 1996. The Authority has the following updates for the 1996 report: . 1. The Authority has continued to provide information to consumers regarding water conservation programs and is maintaining a voluntary conservation status. Changes in types of landscaping using xeriscape, as well as other water use changes, have been recommended to our customers since the origination of our Water Conservation Program. 2. The Authority continues to work on the brackish groundwater demineralization project. This project will extract groundwater from the Lower Sweetwater River. The Environmental Impact Report has been --- completed. Final design is in progress for this project. Construction is expected to commence by Fall of 1997. 3. The Authority plans to store surplus water in groundwater aquifers (San Diego Formation) by using injection/extraction wells. 4. The Authority is proceeding with design and environmental compliance to increase the storage capacity of Sweetwater Reservoir by approximately 2,000 acre-feet. (Enough water to serve 4,000 more families for a year.) 5. The County of San Diego is developing a feasibility -report to produce and distribute reclaimed water. However, Sweetwater Authority does not have plans to distribute reclaimed water at this time. If reclaimed water becomes available, we will consider the potential use of injection into the groundwater aquifer for recharge for our demineralization facility and distribution to potential reclaimed water customers. 6. The staff of the Authority and the Otay Water District have met frequently on sharing of services. A shared resources agreement between the two districts has been executed. This agreement has also expanded to include Padre Dam and Helix Water District. Also, discussions are being held to - improve each agency's water supply reliability by installing additional interconnections. ~~ð Mr. Ed Batchelder Re: 1996 GMOC Report - Service Availability Status January 29,1997 page three 7. Rezoning of older residential communities in Chula Vista to multi-unit housing continues to make existing small diameter cast iron pipes unable to meet the required fire flow demands. Sweetwater Authority requests that consideration be given to this situation before land use decisions that increase demands on the water supply infrastructure are made. 8. Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District continue to work through the San Diego County Water Authority to develop a region-wide "Highly Reliable Water Supply Rate" available for industry. This effort is in response to the mayor of Chula Vista's request for a firm water supply for new industry. This proposal has been merged with the City of San Diego's SWAP program (San Diego Water Availability Plan) which proposes to collect slightly higher rates to provide funds for water transfers. 9. Through Sweetwater Authority's Master Planned Facilities and Metallic Main Replacement Program, we continue to improve the efficiency and reliability of the local water distribution system. All the items listed above are directed towards Sweetwater Authority's goal to reduce dependency on imported water to below fifty percent. Regarding your request to provide an overview of recent activities of the Interagency Water Task Force, we are providing the following ,update of local, regional, and State-level water planning activities: 1. Further progress/refinements regarding MWD's long-term water supply policy. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California has adopted an integrated resources plan which includes six new implementation policies. The policies are as follows: A. Reliabilitv: Through the implementation of the Integrated Resources Plan, MWD and its member agencies will have full capability to meet ~ full service demands at the retail levels at all times. ,4/,/ --.- .-- .._.---_....._-- - --------.-------...--.. , Mr. Ed Batchelder Re: 1996 GMOC Report - Service Availability Status January 29,1997 page four B. Balance: MWD shall demonstrate stewardship by maintaining a resource mix which balances investments and additional improved imported supply capability with investments to assure leadership in local resource development and conservation. C. Competitiveness: MWD shall provide affordable water service and will maintain its competitiveness by assuring that the effective rate for MWD will be less than $500 per acre-foot in the year 2005. D. Eastside Reservoir: MWD affirms its commitment to complete the 800,000 acre-feet Eastside Reservoir Project with water deliveries to storage commencing in 1999. E. Colorado River Aqueduct: MWD will take all necessary access to assure that the Colorado River Aqueduct will be operated at capacity \, for the benefit of all member agencies. F. Adaptability: MWD commits to a resource development and financial strategy that is flexible and will provide acceptable water quality and financial security for MWD and its member agencies. These new policies change the MWD previous goal of 100 percent of the demand 90 percent of the time and 80 percent of the demand the remaining 10 percent of the time, and indicate the MWD's responsiveness to its member agencies' concerns. , 2. Status of discussion with CWA regarding the wheeling of water to increase long-term supply reliability and progress on the related highly reliable water supply rate. The San Diego County Water Authority has prepared a Draft Wheeling Policy and has discussed the policy with the general managers of member agencies. There were many concerns about the policy because it did not encourage member agencies to utilize local resources at an affordable wheeling price. The policy is currently being looked at again by the SDCWA staff. The highly reliable water supply concept was never approved by the SDCWA Board. Instead, the San Diego Water Assurance Plan suggested by the City of San Diego has - been adopted by the CWA Board. The initial concept of this program was to develop ,4/,ól Mr. Ed Batchelder Re: 1996 GMOC Report - Service Availability Status January 29,1997 page five plans to purchase water during water-short years and to pay all costs necessary to deliver the water to San Diego. Currently, the feeling about this concept is being reevaluated and the concept of the San Diego Water Assurance Program is melded into the current negotiations between SDCWA and MWD regarding the Colorado River reliability and the use of the State Water Project. 3. Progress update on Eastside Reservoir construction. Metropolitan has committed to proceeding with the Eastside Reservoir (formerly Domenigoni Reservoir) and has committed to being ready to begin delivering water to storage in this reservoir commencing in 1999. Currently, work is proceeding on construction of the dams and relocation and construction of conveyances which feed the project. 4. Review recent regional discussions regarding reclaimed water planning in conjunction with implementation of Clean Water Program Sewage Treatment Facilities. The Sweetwater Authority is not involved in projects in the Otay River at this time. The Authority is talking to the County of San Diego about its construction of an 8 to 10 MGD reclaimed water treatment plant on the Spring Valley trunk sewer. Sweetwater Authority's concept is to use reclaimed water in the seawater barrier along Interstate 5 which would protect its future Phase II of the Lower Sweetwater River Demineralization Facility from seawater intrusion. We hope the information provided in this letter helps to better communicate the steps currently being taken to continuously improve'the reliability of Sweetwater Authority, locally, regionally and state-wide. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Hector Martinez at 422-8395, ext. 613. Very truly yours, SWEETWATER AUTHORITY Richard A. Reynolds General Manager RAR:HM:ln 17/,3 pc: Mr. James L. Smyth, Chief Engineer, Sweetwater Authority . , - I APPENDIX I , ~¡,.y .. MEMORANDUM January 24, 1997 TO: The Growth Management Oversight Conunission VIA: John D. Goss, City Manager q FROM: Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks, Recreation and Open spac~ SUBJECT: Compliance with the Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard - July 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996 The Deparunent is pleased to present a report on Parks and Recreation activities relating to the Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard in the Growth Management Ordinance. The last reporting date was March of 1996. This report is strucmred in the following topical areas: · Threshold Compliance Findings · IdentificationlDiscussion of Current, Relevant Issues, and Proposed Remedial Actions for Non- Compliance Conditions · Response to IssueslRecommendations from FY 1995/96 · Proposed Actions/Suggested Recommendations for Current Year Threshold Compliance Findin!!s Attachment' A' is a revised park deficiency statistics report. The numbers are slightly revised from past years, based on population information provided by the City's Planning Deparunent and the State of California Deparunent of Finance. Presently, the City has a shortfall in park acreage from 2.20 acres per thousand to 2.08 acres per thousand (July 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996). The on-going park deficiency can be attributed to two factors: 1. The timing of subdivision construction: Typically new park acreage is not added to the system at the same rate as the city's population increases. This is a common occurrence for only a short period of time. This lag in park construction is attributed to the phasing of the subdivision's public infrastrucmre. This usually includes streets, sewers, sidewalks, gutters, etc. For example, during the initial phases of subdivision constructiçn and occupancy, the neighborhood may not have a park because of its location in the subdivision. Further, when fees are paid for parks, the developer pays for the number of housing units approved on their final map. In the past, when large quantities of units were approved, large acres of park land was developed. In teday's economy, a typical subdivision fina1 map contains increments of 20-100 units.' As this occurs, staff must wait until sufficient funds are collected through the park land dedication fee to build a park that is of sufficient size to serve the residents of that subdivision at full build-out. Finally, the park construction phase may lag behind the occupancy of the homes. For instance, a given subdivision may grow to a population of 1,000 residents but the park may be in its construction phase or one year maintenance period and not available for public use. However, - [¡moo. gmoo97/gmoó.""J 1 ¡::; ¡,S-- ~.__ __ _____.._____.____m.__~__"·. Growth Management Oversight Commission January 16, 1997 there is a certain catch-up period once the park is built. In some cases, the park, once it is built could exceed the park land ratio witil the subdivision is built-out. 2. Western Chula Vista Park Deficiency: The western park deficiency is due, in part, to a change in the parkland ratio standard of 2.00 acres per thousand to 3.00 acres per thousand, in 1987. In addition, the deficiency was exacerbated further through the annexation of the park deficient Montgomery area approximately 11 years ago. As you will read further on in this status report, a City plan which is in its last stages of development, establishes an action plan which addresses our park deficiency. Attachment 'B" is an EastlWest Inventory as of June 30, 1996. Two fmal points worth noting about park acreage are: (1) four eastern parks will be master planned, constructed or accepted by staff this year: Voyager Park [10 acres] (final construction document phase), Explorer Park [5+ acres] (constructed and in a maintenance period), EastLake Neighborhood Park [10 acres] (Master planned and finalizing construction plans), and Salt Creek Ranch Community Park [22 acres] and Neighborhood Park [10 acres] (currently in the needs assessment phase of park master planning); and (2) staff is working on the purchase of slightly less than 1-1/2 acres of land in western ChuIa Vista for a recreation facility. The candidate property is located on Main Street and its service . area will include the Otay neighborhood. IdentificationIDiscussion of Current. Relevant Issues. and Proposed Remedial Actions for Non- Compliance Conditions Although new park acreage has not been accepted for maintenance since the inclusion of Chula Vista Community Park in 1994, the Department completed or commenced the following projects during the review period: 1. ParkWay Center - Phase I: Project Status: Completed. 2. Parkway Complex Rehabilitation: The parkwaý Center, Phase II, Renovation Project includes the interior rehabilitation of the community center. Wòrk will entail accessibility improvements and office modifications to include heating/ventilation, lighting, an improved computer registration area, and office area. , 3. Play Equipment Renovation ($420,970): This next fiscal year the Department hopes to renovate (contingent on funding) play areas at Loma Verde, Eucalyptus and Valle Lindo Parks. Depending on funding availability, the Department hopes to add more equipment to the Rohr Park play area as well. The staff work will require site analysis, formulation of working drawings and construction documents. 4. Park Security Lighting ($64,000): Security lighting at Memorial Park and Lauderbach Park to mitigate problem areas. Additional park security lighting is needed for these parks. 5. Memorial Park II ($125,000): Project Status: A new restroom was constructed because the previous existing restroom was old, deteriorated and did not meet ADA compliance standards. - (pooo . ga>«97/8""Ó.'P'¡ 2 -4/,1., Growth Management Oversight Commission January 16, 1997 6. Memorial Bowl Stage Improvements ($98,500): Project Status: Currently under construction. 7. Otay Gymnasium ($2,410,000): In Fall of this year construction will commence, with an anticipated opening date of December of 1997. 8. Otay Gymnasium Site Acquisition (may require additional funding for Otay Gymnasium project above): Staff from Community Development and Parks and Recreation are jointiy investigating the feasibility of acquiring property along Main Street- for the location and construction of the Otay Gymnasiwn (PR-133). Currentiy environmental ~ork is being performed, two appraisals have been completed, and staff will be presenting a proposal to the Council this Spring. 9. McCandliss Memorial - Phase II ($85,000): Council approved funding for constructing a decomposed granite access way; Memorial Plaza; revised sand play area and associated concrete paving at Halecrest Park - 415 East J Street. The work includes removal of existing improvements, protection and restoration of existing improvements, excavation and grading, placement of decomposed granite paving, construction of cast in place .concrete retaining walls, irrigation and planting, and other miscellaneous work as shown on the drawings. The project bid has been awarded and construction will commence shortly. 10. Eucalyptus Park Master Plan ($U6,000): Eucalyptus Park is the next park scheduled for the Department's Master Planning program. This high use park was chosen because of its deteriorated condition and non-functional elements. Staff will analyze and recommend the best arrangements for park amenities. A cost conscious phasing program will be developed for the capital improvement schedule. As noted in previous years, there are two main issues affecting the City's ability to meet the park acreage standards: a lag in the park development process and acreage availability (western Chula Vista) due to lower park ratio standards prior to 1987. The latter issue will be addressed in the Parks Implementation Plan, discussed"in more detail below. Response to Focus Issues from 1995 GMOC Final Report , Focus Issue # 1. Provide status update regarding the Western Park Implementation Plan's (PIP) completion, and the related development of fmal Ian"auage for adoption of a revised Threshold Standard. There have been several accomplishments in the progress toward completion of the PIP. Staff completed an inventory of all recreation and sports facilities on the campuses of Sweetwater Union High School District and Chula Vista Elementary School District. Although some of the amenities at elementary school sites do not meet City standards (they are designed for use by elementary age children only), many of the amenities may be evaluated as potential recreation site uses which may alleviate the park deficiency. In addition, the City has begun the process of bringing its facilities up to ADA compliance to accommodate the disabled. !gmoo . gmoc'TIl""""""""J 3 19¿? --.-....--....-- --.......---.,. ...- ._._._-_.._---,_..--_.._-----~- Growth Management Oversight Commission January 16, 1997 Staff also recently completed an evaluation/inventory of all western and older eastern parks and facility sites. Teams went out into the field and evaluated potential capital improvements. This inventory is currently being assembled to augment the Department's five year CIP Plan, in order to give the City Council information for future decision making for parks and recreation amenities in Chula Vista. During the course of staffs work in the PIP. the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Department and the Planning Department, have been presented with a number of parks issues within existing and proposed master planned communities in eastern Chula Vista. Those issues involved matters of facility placement, joint usage with school sites, private parks facilities credit, and possible credits for open space areas in meeting parks and recreation standards. Similar to the PIP effort, staff and the affected developers (EastLake, Baldwin, JM Development and Emerald Properties) have completed a needs assessment. AJ; part of the reorganization of the work program, it would be appropriate at this time to also re-title the project to recognize the city-wide emphasis. In addition, by putting both the western and eastern components together into a single plan, the City would also fully achieve preparation of the city-wide Parks and Recreation Master Plan called for in the General Plan Parks and Recreation Element. Therefore, the scope of work in the approved PIP Work Plan was revised to include similar analyses for eastern Chula Vista. By including eastern Chula Vista, staff would be able to make comprehensive recommendations to the City Council regarding future parks and recreation needs on a city-wide basis. The consolidated planning efforts of eastern and western Chula Vista will most likely conclude in Fall of this year. Since planning of the PIP is currently underway, language for a revised park threshold in western ChuIa) '( Vista is not ready for consideration. . . - Other Planrúne: Efforts AJ; the Commission may be aware, a major component of adding recreation and park land to Chula Vista is the Otay Valley Regional Park project. The current status of the Otay Valley Regional Park planning process is: The proposed regional park is 13 miles long, encompassing over 3,000 acres and would provide the opportunity for several neighborhood parks and one community park. Joint staff involved with the project (City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego and County of San Diego) completed the preparation of the Otay Valley Regional Park Concept P\an. The Concept Plan was presented to and approved by the Otay Valley Regional Park Citizen's Advisory Committee (CAC). The Concept Plan will be going to the Executive Management Team of the project and to the City's Boards/Commissions for consideration and approval in rnid-1997. Property acquisition to date includes 78 acres through a: grant from the California Coastal Conservancy. Additional funding is being sought for more property purchases. Threshold Standard A report on matters related to the threshold standard was considered by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The report is being reviewed and will either be folded into the PIP, or presented to the City Council in the near future. In their 1994 Annual Report, the GMOC conceptually endorsed the draft. --' gm<c . gmœ97/¡onoó.<p<J 4 )tl/,? Growth Management Oversight Commission January 16, 1997 r;ocus Issue #2. Provide status update in the development and adoption of the MSCP, and its bearing on the timing for preparation of a Greenbelt Master Plan. See Attachment ·C·. Focus Issue #3. ""= fu. "'om" of ,,",y R..",b .pp"",", "'_ _""'.00 ~ 7 partial PAD (threshold) credit for public park spaces of 5 acres or less. . See Attachment "D". Proposed Actions/Su!!!!ested Recommendations for the Current Year Any proposed action that may be recommended to the Commission regarding any follow-up actions would be based on the completion of the Parks Implementation Plan. As this report is in the preparation stage, it would be premature for staff to offer any recommendations of substance; other than it is staffs full intent to commence with any actions that the City Council may approve following the Council's consideration of the Parks Implementation Plan. JV: Attachments "A" - Park Deficiency Statistics Report liB" _ East/W est Inventory "C" - Memorandum from Planning Department on MSCP - "D" - Memorandum from Plaruùng Department on Otay Ranch Threshold Credit , - l<m« . """,971""""'.'1'1 5 ,4/,7 -.-.-,. - ---.....- -..-..- ...-_.. -,-.. - --.--.----.......--..- ._."--_.._.,~-_.._.. ~._---"-~-_.- . '" '" ". "'I '" '" '" "'{ ° '" ® "' '" ø'" '" :t: ~ CD 0 ~ ~ CD ..;: "-: q U) ~ q Ñ . o~øø Il'!O - 01 co CJ) v U) or: 0) ...... co 0. C') C\I V C\I cac.ë:; (")00 c ...... v.- U) C) C'J 0'1 V ...... to -cœ.r:. œ . va...... ...... 10 CO) . v -...... C "'C _ ...... _ E g ...... I ...... ~1ØÕ;"": ~~ -§ Q ~=E~:: a.ø rtt C ø a.1 0 3: ( ) Q) ::: :J ... a.. 0 ø (II ~ £ <C -, O-OJ::.... 0c u.O......_a:I 10_ c.cCOLOC\lOCOtOO>VVU)C')C\lNQ)..5 v ~ ~ ó ~ ~ g ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ om~ø ~8 ...... ~ ~ v ~ ci re ~ M ~ C\I ci ci caa..¡m MO ...... va...... ...... U) M C") ~ ......"'0"05 ......_ ...... ....... ...... v ~ c _. .... (/J ~ I t..- ro: 0') _ CD 1'1:I «I ~:g!:: a..C1I E 4I1Ø03: :~ t!I' ....c.0œQl ...._ ..., o_o~.... 0c U.O......_fII «1_ ......VlOV......lt)OONtOOr--.NCII.,£: ""'" ~ C\I M ~ ~ lO ~ C\I q ~ ~ ~ q ~ oœ0ø ~o C) ~ 0 v v "": 0) ...... 10 ~ C\I C\I 0 N cac.ë:; (")8 ...... C\I C\I ,... co N en 0 M C\I to -cQ).c . v 0............ 10 C') ...... V ......c-c- ....._ g ......' ...... . ~raø"":;~ rJ) Q) ~:g!:: a.œ o c CIIrtlO~3: mœ ¡::: :J .... c..o CD CD :!.£ rJ) ..., O-o..c.... 0c ¡::: u.O......_CG CG_ <:tn VMIl>OUìOr--......LONNI'-ø..5...... ~ ~ 1O M ~ ~ ~ ~ C\I ~ ~ ~ ~ It! ~ oœ~œ qg ~ ...... Ñ ~ v ~ ~ re ...... g ci ~ C\I ~ * caQ..¡œ Va Ü ...... v 0............ V M ...... v ......~"'C£ ......_ Z ....... ...... ,~.... _. .... en W :>. L,.- IU (/J ...... m CtI - n; g:g:!: Q..œ S¿ E 111«103: :.ê u. ra ....a.0œm ...._ w .., a_0oC'- 0c £:) LLO............IG as_ o lOVNN(J)U') MVI.O<D c.cCÞ..5 v z ~ C') M 0 C') 1O V C\I co lO co NO)""," oœØœ ......0 <: C') ~ 0 ~ ...... ~ ci ...... Ó ~ Ñ ci ~ ~ ~~ë~ ~o d ~ 0 N ~ ~ N ~ ~ M 0 ~ ~m~ 0 ..... ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ o::r- C? ~ "C" ~c1:J- ~_ II: 0 ~. ~ I ~~Cñ.: a;~ « M eD-mrl) ~CU a.. m > .:: ~ m <: c m~o3:: "'m I- ~ ~c..0mœ :!£ UJ ..., O-0..c~ 0c - U.O~_~ ra_ > " <::~tO"C"tONOtON~tOU")r-..C\lCD CÐ_ ~ ~ ~ ~ M 0 to M o::r- N C\I C\I CD N r-.. ~ oa;0CÐ ~O ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ N ~ ci ~ ci ~ N N ~ ci ra~ëa; ~g ION CD ~ N CD ~ MOM ~"CID..c ~ Ü ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ "C" M ~ v c~- ~0 U. >. ...-. ~ 2:'~0': alra o (ij ~:g:!: ~ID >- ª m «I 0 3::.. ~ ~ I- «I ~~0CÐCÐ ~_ U ~ tfõ~£ = g.E OtOr-..O~~MN...-~..-MC")eD.E CD ~ 0 Ó ~ ~ ~ o::r- N ..- ~ ~ C\I N ~ 0 a; 0 ø CD 0 m ~ m ~ Ó ~ ci ~ ¿ ~ ci N ~ ~ rac..ë-a; cig ~ ~ ~ ~ lO N CD to...- ~ U") 1:JID..c ~ C') 0 ~ ~ "C" CO) ...- CO) ~c1:J- ~__ g ~. ~ ~ "C" ~CClCñ.: a;~ ø ~:g:!: c..œ c œ CCI 0 3::.. ~ ~ ~ \ ~c..°CDm...._ ~ O-0..c~ 0c u.. 0...- __ ra CIS_ MOlO lOtOlOo::r-OCClO CDCDeD.5 CD ~ to Ó r-.. ~ ~ ~ N ~ cc m N "C" ~ oa;øm ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ci q ci ~ N ~ ci N ~ ~ ra~ëœ Mg o ~ W o::r- N ~ "C" ~ M M ~1:JCD..c ..- ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ M ...- C? c~- ....0 ~ ~ ~ ~ "C" ~caø': mra ItS ~:g:!: c...œ ~ m I'( 0 3:: q) m ~ ....~omm ~= ~ o-0..c.... 0c ¡::::" lLO...-_ca ca_ ~ ø C , ,,~ '" "'\ 3: ;b o 0 >. .- CD ar 111 :: ~ = "C () - 0 - . cr to 0 ~ -~"O ~ o -- 0 en . .... ccU")ø CDlOm ca ",-,-0'""'::á53: .g ~I" o-",wá5o' >ø~¡¡ " a¡Jo~(/) -=(/)111>"0",_ ° -Ü;õcn-"'Oen"C:>'5cnUJ E õca œOC1l-œ~->CtI en _UJø 00~ ~ ox 10:>'0-0 ¡:::: en raxeD > >. __xc ~ racnUJ~>CI»~-CI)ü~.!!! ° W ~ _ >..::.:: = U ~ _ ~ .. 0 . ~o.1!! ;¡;O~ ~o.1!!~ W E co-o ï:: c a.. 0 ~ c a.. 0 ï:: a.. ,¥J. 7() >- 0> ..Q_o.o..Q_o~o_º_o~o_ 0 jûo:::::...cftjo:::::.æftjo::::..co Z 0 -cnrl)CI)-CI)ct) -cncnUJcn I- n .. ~œCtlm~mmm:;J.........m ,.., EAST/WEST PARK INVENTORY ATTACJ\1E1'oI, "B" as of June 30, 1996 City of ChuJa Vista II EAST OF 1-805 WEST OF I-80S II I Park I Acreage II Park I Acreage I Discovery Park 14.5 Eucalyptus Park . 19.8 Greg Rogers Park 52.1 "J" Street Marina 21.4 Rohr Park 62.2 Bay Blvd. Park 1.5 Bonita Long Canyon 12.5 Friendship Park 8.4 Halecrest Park 2.0 Hilltop Park 10.9 Independence Park 4.1 Lauderbach Park 4.0 Paseo del Rey Park 3.0 Lorna Verde Park 6.2 Rancho del Rey Park 10.2 Los Ninos Park 5.2 Sunbow Park 4.0 Marina View Park 4.5 Sunridge Park 6.0 Memorial Park 8.0 ~ Terra Nova Park 8.5 Norman Park 1.7 Tiffany Park 7.2 Orange Avenue Fields 4.0 Valle Lindo Park 4.2 Otay Park 5.2 Chula Vista Rdnstra Ball . . 6.0 Community Park 12.9 Fields Palomar Park 3.1 . SDG&E Park 18.0 Connoley Park .65 Holiday Estates I . .26 Holiday Estates II .26 Lancerlot Park .10 . Sherwood Park .28 . 203.4 129.45 .--./ [,moo. gmoo97/_0.ob .OI.07·97 ~71 APPENDIX J , A7;;J.. ~~ ~¡¡;<S g ol'i;c ¡, ,æ .IAN 2 3 1997 ~ January 17, 1997 1D: Growth Management Oversight Commission FROM: Andy Hamilton, APCD· Last December, as part of its Indirect Source Program, the Air Pollution Control Board directed the District to produce a voluntary guidance document on how local jurisdictions can reduce velúcle emissions through appropriate land use and transportation planning. TIris document, entitled Air OualitvlLand Use Guidelines for General Plans, is available for public review. The document is intended to support the work of local planning departments in implementing the Land Use Distribution Element and related strategies to reduce velúcle trips. The intended audience includes elected officials, co=unity planning groups and interested members of the public. The District intends to follow up issuance of the document by offering technical assistance adapting the policies to local needs, as the need or interest arises. In the interest of reducing reading material for the Air Quality Threshold review, the attached draft includes only Chapter 2 and Appendix A. Chapter 2, the heart of the document, contains the policies, their justification, and known examples. Appendix A lists the policies alone. (Gaps in ¡ numbering have occured through successive revisions as policies have been deleted or combined.) , The idea here was to provide an exhaustive list of policies and strategies for increasing the use of alternatives to the automobile. An interested jurisdiction might choose to adopt only some of these policies. I GMOC members are welcome to request Chapters 1, 3, and 4, which provide introductory I material, implementation tools (legal and financial), and a review of current General Plans within the county, respectively. From our review of the plans, it is apparent some of the suggested ! policies have already been adopted, many in Chula Vista. Review Schedule While the GMOC may benefit from the Guidelines, the District also welcomes co=ent on them. In addition to suggesting changes to the policies, please note appropriate local examples not ;:nentioned. The review period is scheduled to conclude by April 5. I am available to answer questions orreceive co=ents at (619) 694-8965. I ,L}73 I I -..-- -_.._.._-_.~_.~_._-_._--_..._._------~~ . . --------~-_.._.__.~--_.." -.-. DRAFT PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT - JANUARY 17, 1996 APPENDIX A. LAND USE AND TRANSPORT A TION POLICIES This section reprints the policies presented in Chapter 2 without the implementation strategies and the justification. It is a comprehensive "menu" of objectives and policies any or all of which could be incorporated into a General Plan or a Co=unity Plan. GOA. L: TO REDUCE TRIPS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ARRANGEMENT OF LAND USES OBJECTIVE: To design land uses to allow travel by alternatives to the single-occupant automobile. LAND USE: PROJECT PLANNING AND REVIEW Policy 1 The City/County of _ should consider air quality when planning land uses or considering changes to the land use pattern of this co=unity . Policy 2 AU City/County submittals of transportation projects to be included in regional transportation improvement programs should be consistent with the air quality goals and policies of the General Plan. LAND USE: PUBLIC EDUCATIONIPARTICIPATION Policy 6 The City/County of _ should work to educate the public on the link between transportation, land use, and air quality. Policy 7 The City/County of _should actively involve the public in all important decisions regarding transportation infrasttucture and land use planning. LAND USE: DEVELOPMENT PATTERN Policy 8 The City/County of _ should encourage new urban development with a mix of uses, and efficiently linked by transit to existing activity centers, minimizing new vehicle trips. , Policy 10 The City/County of _should encourage the development of pedestrian-oriented co=unities, both within and outside transit focus areas. Policy 11 The City/County of _should encourage clustered development in lower density areas to provide greater opportunities for walking, bicycling, and ridesharing. Policy 12 The City/County of _should work to preserve and enhance existing neighborhoods and co=ercial districts having transit and pedestrian- oriented designs. ,z}?¥ D rn © r? O'W ¡g ~¡! I~ :.IN 2 3 1997 A-I t.:...__.._..._._.~_____...__,,___._____~. _______._______m_ DRAFT Policy 14 The City/County of _should designate one or more central business cores for high-density and uúxed-use development. Policy 15 The City/County of _should encourage pedestrian-oriented uses to locate in designated uúxed-use, pedestrian-oriented districts or neighborhoods. LAND USE: PUBLIC FACILITIES Policy 18 The City/County of _should adopt a development fee structure thai reflects the ture marginal cost of providing infrastructure and sei:vices to each development project Policy 19 The City/County of _should give priority to transit focus areas and higher density areas when allocating funds for infrastructure improvements and public services. Policy 20 The City/County of _should encourage subdivision designs that incorporate existing or planned parks, libraries, and other public facilities within walking distance of residential uses. LAND USE: SITE DESIGNS Policy 22 The City/County of _should encourage developers to design project sites to increase the convenience, safety and comfort of people using transit, walking or cycling. Policy 23 The City/County of _ should require all development projects proposed within 2,000 feet of an existing or planned light rail transit, co=uter rail, express bus, or transit corridor stop to incorporate site design measures that enhance access to the transit system. Policy 25 The City/County of _ should review all plans for subdivision streets and lots, co=ercial sites, public facilities and multi-family residences to identify design changes to improve access by transit, bicycle, and walking. , LAND USE: COMMERCIAL/INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT Policy 26 The City/County of _ should ensure that, wherever possible, new co=ercial developments include convenient, comfortable, and safe pedestrian/bicycle connections to adjacent properties. Policy 27 The City/County of _ should encourage the location of large employment or shopping centers in major bus transit corridors and within walking distance of planned or existing transit stations. ¡ A7~ A-2 ---' , --<-,.,-,-_._-,-,-----_._------ DRAFT Policy 28 The City/County of _ should encourage the location of pedestrian- accessible neighborhood co=ercial areas within walking distance of residences. LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Policy 31 The City/County of _ should encourage compatible inÍùl and redevelopment projects within urban residential areas. Policy 32 The City/County of _ should encourage higher housing densities in transit corridors maximize transit ridership. SUGGESTED GOALS AND POLICIES FOR CIRCULATION ELEMENTS OBJECTIVE: To provide a transportation, system which maximizes opponunities for walking, bicycling, and transit use. TRANSPORTATION: MULTI-MODAL SYSTEM Policy 33 The City/County of _ should plan for a multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the co=unity and improves air quality. Policy 34 The City/County of _ should work with SANDAG to vigorously pursue and use state and federal funds earmarked for pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements. Policy 35 The City/County of _ should encourage transit, pedestrian and bicycle travel in existing suburban neighborhoods by constructing additional pathways where appropriate. Policy 36 The City/County of _ should work with transit providers to plan for multi-modal transfer sites that incorporate bicycle paths, bicycle parking, transit, pedestrian access, and Park and Ride lots. Policy 39 The City/County of _ should provide pedestrian, bicycle, and automobile facilities that connect co=unities and reduce the burden on the freeway system for shon trips. , TRANSPORTATION: TRANSIT Policy 40 The City/County of _ should coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions and transit providers to plan land uses supporting existing transit services and to designate future transit corridors. Policy 42 The City/County of _ should specify site design and roadway features to enhance-pedestrian and bicycle access to transit in existing service corridors and those designated for future transit service. .. ~7¡' A-3 DRAFT Policy 43 The City/County of _ should participate with regional transit agencies to identify potential light rail or co=uter rail corridors during majer General Plan updates and take action to protect the right-of-way from incompatible development TRANSPORTATION: BICYCLE FACILITIES Policy 46 The City/County of _ should plan and construct a comprehensive system of bikeways in accordance with an adopted City/County plan: Policy 47 The City/County of _ should ensure that co=uter bikeways are extended to serve new development Policy 48 The City/County of _ should ensure that upgrades to existing roads (widening, curb and gutter, etc.) include bicycle and pedestrian improvements where appropriate. Policy 49 The City/County of _ should encourage new major activity centers, office, and co=ercial development to provide secure bicycle storage and bicycle parking facilities. Policy 50 The City/County of _ should consider unused portions of rights-of- way for use as bikeways and pedestrian paths. - TRANSPORTATION: PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Policy 51 The City/County of _ should develop and implement a master plan for pedestrian facilities and amenities in new and existing areas of development Policy 54 The City/County of _ should revise street design standards to deter speeding and encourage pedestrian and bicycle access. Policy 55 The City/County of _ should encourage the development of interconnected street networks. Policy 56a The City/County of _ should institute a program to prioritize and implement "traffic calming" measures where appropriate to reduce traffic speeds and enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety. TRANSPORTATION: PARKING Policy 57 The City/County of _ should ensure parking requirements do not significantly exceed demand, while addressing spillover parking in local neighborhoods. Policy 58 The City/County of _ should support pedestrian-oriented co=ercial areas in major activity centers by appropriately pricing the municipal parking supply. /ì7? A-4 --~.._._,_..._--+---,.- - -----~_. DRAIT Policy 59 The City/County of _ should allow on-street parking, where compatible with existing land uses, to buffer pedestrians from vehicle traffic. Policy 60 The City/County of _ should encourage parking facility designs that enhance the pedestrian environment. Policy 61 The City/County of _ should reduce parking requirements in exchange for construction <:Jf walking, bicycling, and transit amenities that reduce parking demand. ,e:J74' A-S . Am POLLUfION CONTROL DISTRICT Growth Management Oversight Commission Meeting of Jan. 30, 1997 Andy Hamilton 694-8965 GENERAL L 1996 Air Quality · Federal: 2 transport + 0 local days over standard = 2 First time in 40 years of monitoring that no local exceedances were recorded · State: 24 (est.) transport + 27 (est.) local days over standard = 51 · 0 Health Advisory Days (15 pphm) · Chula Vista monitoring station: No federal exceedances; 1 state exceedance 2. Compliance Activity in Chula Vista · XX businesses with violations Contact Theresa Moms, 694-3342 · XX Notices of Violations · 5 Major sources Contact Barney MacIntire, 694-3314 FEDERAL ISSUES 3. 1994 State Implementation Plan (federal) · Approved by EPA September 1996 · Shows region will attain standard by 1999 · District just fùed Milestone Compliance Demo showing we're on track to meet 1999 target · EP A has proposed stricter ozone and particulate matter (PM) standards · Ozone - 8ppm over 8 hours · PM- · New standards, once implemented, will reqlrire new State Implementation Plan (SIP) · New standards could trigger major Congressional battle · Effect on San Diego County unclear. STATE ISSUES 6. AB3319 allows Districts to exempt medium-sized emitters from New Source Review control requirements. San Diego is pursuing this. . 7. Updating the Regional Air Quality Strategy - New control effectiveness data is being used to delete and possibly add control measures. New measures will include: · Low-NOx standards for newly installed furnaces and water heaters · Volatility standards for adhesives 8. Air Resources Board research indicates California motor vehicle controls will be more effective in the long run than previously thought. 9. Indirect Source Program · Draft Air Quality/Land Use Guidelines for General Plans under review since June 1996. · Technical assistance on amending General Plans to reduce bias against walking, biking, and transit. The Guidelines cite Chula Vista for particularly good policies and development projects. However, predominant low-density zoning makes pedestrian, bike, and transit travel difficult. /9 7'1 -~~._---_._.._._----_..- -- .. . . DRAFT · Implementation of the land use measures recommended by the C02 Task Force (which APCD sits on) would satisfy many of the recommendations in the Draft Guidelines. · Implementation of land use measures to improve air quality and reduce CO2 emissions may conflict with the GMOC traffic threshold. Reducing local street traffic is usually accomplished by reducing development density, which increases vehicle trips and highway congestion. APeD recommends examining traffic congestion from a broader perspective, e.g. person-trip congestion rather than vehicle congestion (see attached discussion). · Implementation of SANDAG's Land Use Distribution Element of the Regional Growth Management Strategy is also recommended as a priority for the city. 10. AB 2766 Vehicle Registration Fund: Proposed 1997 Projects Oceanside Schools Purchase 6 CNG buses $200,000 Clean Air Partners Conven 54 Trash Trucks to LNG $1,771,500 San Marcos Schools Purchase 12 CNG buses $300,000 Southbay Union Schools Purchase 2 CNG buses $100,000 SANDAG Vanpool Subsidies $250,000 NCID Purchase/Install Bike Racks $19,884 County of San Diego Guaranteed Ride Horne Program $36,400 Commuter Training Inst. Park and Ride Development $55,440 MlDB Sorrento Valley Coaster Connection $700,000 City of Carlsbad Coastal Rail Trail Bike Path $184,176 · Contingent: $664,659 offered to MlDB for CNG bus purchases subject to local match · Chula Vista Distance Learning Project ($62,500) didn't make funding cut-<>ff · Board decided not to fund technology R&D projects, including Metallic Power battery research project, co-funded by Chula Vista, South Coast Air District, and others · Next Request For Proposals out in 1998. REGIONAL ISSUES 11. Border Vehicle Program , · AB2008 (1993) requires foreign commuters to register vehicles in California · No effective enforcement mechanism has been identified. · Working with Mexican officials on a public information campaign in TIjuana · Rep. Bilbray filed a bill to penalize border commuters using vehicles not registered in California. ,.q K'O · Traffic Flow Standards - The Best Way to Increase Traffic? Excerpted from Draft Land Use/ Air Quality Guidelines for General Plans, S.D. Air Pollution Control District January 1997 One standard popular among cities, and required by the region's Congestion Management Plan, is a traffic flow or Level of Service standard. Level of Service categories range from "A" (free-flowing) to "F" (stop-and-go traffic). At Level of Service C, the regional standard, motorists can drive at least half their nonnal speed at all times. While this seems reasonable, insisting on minimal traffic delays even during commute hours can easily increase the length and number of vehicle trips by forcing development into low- density or fringe areas. The result is overburdened arterials and clogged highways. Level of Service standards are usually applied without acknowledgment of this risk or of the beneficial effect of congestion on transit use, pedestrian activity, and support of local businesses by nearby residents. Recognizing this problem, several U.S. cities have adopted alternative standards.! Montgomery County, Maryland, and the Florida Department of Transportation both relax Level of Service standards in areas oriented to pedestrians, bikes, or I transit. For example, Dade County permits roads to serve 150 ,- percent of planned capacity in corridors served by a rail line or express buses. Other areas average Level of Service along a single arterial (Snohomish County, Washington), across parallel roadways (Brevard County, Florida; Orlando, Florida, Montgomery County, Maryland), or within a defined district, rather than measuring Level of Service only at individual intersections, as is nonnally done. Still another approach has been to average Level of Service for person-trips across all travel modes (roads and transit) rather than simply examining vehicle trips (Pierce County, Washington). Each of these methods seeks to balance traffic congestion reductions with other community goals, including air quality, pedestrian access, and lower taxes. By contrast, strict Level of Service standards inherently assume free flowing local traffic is worth any price necessary to achieve it. 1 Savage, Joseph P., Jr. 1993. WS Leaærs, Plannin~ January 1993, American Planning Association. ¡!fFI APPENDIX K /lK~ -. - __n_ -- ---. AIR QUALITY THRESHOLD I, DATE: February 20,1997 TO: GMOC - Growth Management Oversight Committee FROM: Barbara Bamberger, Environmental Resource Manage~ Threshold Compliance Findin¡:-s I. The city's Environmental Resource Division has implemented numerous projects aimed at air quality threshold compliance. The projects meet the guidelines of the threshold. SummarY In 1995-96, the City embarked on a major planning effort to develop a Carbon Dioxide Reduction Plan. The plan was completed and went out for public review during this reporting period. The plan, as drafted, projects a 100,000 annual ton reduction of CO; and related emissions each year through the year 20 I O. It plans to accomplish this goal by diversifying the City's transportation system, using ~nergy more efficiently through land use/transportation ~ - coordination, incentivizing residential builders to cut household energy consumption by 50%, '~.. and providing options for residents to cut commute driving. The CO2 Reduction Plan includes: 1. Improvements in pedestrian transit connections resulting in a 15,936,500 savings of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per year and 83,258 million BTU (MMBtu) energy saved annually. 2. Increasing housing and employment density within 1/4 mile of major transit routes and stops resulting in 55,657,578 VMT per year and 290,775 MMBtu/year saved. 3. Energy efficient residential builder incentive program, resulting in 105,777 mmbtu/yr energy saved. 4. Transit oriented site design, resulting in 11,000,400 VMT (miles/year) saved per year and 57,500 MMBtu energy saved. If the City does not implement the Plan, CO2 emissions and associated with air pollutants are forecasted to increase emissions by 200,000 tons per year by the year 2010. This is based upon increased VMT and population growth projections. The plan is expected to go to Council for adoption in the spring of this year. The plan, once adopted, will implement 20 policy changes related to land use, transportation, the city's operations, building and housing construction, and '-' ,4~3 --...-. --..--.------- education. The City has exceeded compliance in its implementation of an Alternative Fuel Rebate Retrofit program. To date, the program has provided $23,000 in rebates for electric and CNG vehicle retrofits. The alternative fuel vehicle is estimated to save 27 tons of CO2 per year and, replace 20 ICE vehicles and 893 million BTU in energy savings. The City has also realized a reduction in vehicle miles traveled annually fÌ"om resident participation in the Telecenters program. The telecenters have resulted in 50,000 VMT saved, along with the associated criteria pollutant reductions. Finally, this year the City embarked on a significant municipal lighting retrofit program. During the reporting period, the City retrofitted 33 buildings with energy efficient lights, both internally and externally. This resulted in air quality impacts as follows: 1995: 720,543 Kwh/year 1996: 294,518 CO2 saved per year 352,044 Kwh II. Identification of current/relevant issues and activities· related to threshold compliance: The two most significant current issues are: 1. Implementation of the CO2 Plan in 1997 and, prioritization of the land-use policies within that plan for implementation in 1997-98, in time for 1997 plan development reviews, 2. Continued commitment to the Telecenter Project, 3. Exploration of the effects of utility restructuring for city residents as of 1-1-98. ill. In 1995-96, the GMOC report stated (p.14, 5th bullet): "Establishment of the Indirect Source Program for local jurisdictions to receive technical assistance on amending the local General Plan and/or other local land use plans to reduce bias against walking, and promote design which encourages biking and the use of transit. APCD will produce a set of General Plan guidelines by the end of 1996." ' If the Indirect Source program has been established by the APCD, it would behoove the City to take advantage of this effort and request technical assistance to implement CO2 Plan measures consistent with the Indirect Source Program. /JK~ IV. Proposed actionslsuggested recommendations for the current year: New recommendations: 1. The most promising energy/air quality improvement may be the opportunity presented as a result of electric utility restructuring in California. Utilities will be deregulated as of 1/1/98 and consumers will have a choice as to from whom they purchase power. Residents and businesses will have the right to choose where their energy will come from, be it natural gas plants in Chula Vista, renewable energy such as hydro-electricity, wind or solar power from Arizona, heavily polluting energy production sources such as coal or oil power plants, or a mix of all of the above. The GMOC may wish to recommend the City purchase energy for its own buildings and street lights from an energy mix containing a large percentage of renewables. Furthermore, the City is participating with SANDAG to aggregate energy for the region. GMOC also could recommend that the City participate in aggregation efforts which prioritize inclusion of power generated from renewable sources. Ths includes development of a Green Power Pool to offer residents a choice ofless polluting power for their homes. .- -- . ~ FIg'S APPENDIX L ,4FIP -PROPOSED DRAFT REVISED THRESHOLD STANDARD- ~ AIR QUALITY . , GOAL: To maintain and improve the ambient air quality enjoyed by the citizens of Chula Vista. OBJECTIVE: Recognizing that airqualityisan i~sue V>'hi~hcaAAet se e#ec;ti'/cly ñ~~ª~~ª~ addressed BY [Aula Vista, ªt§§Œ~hiii~¡9Dªt~hª!§g,~1!~ý~I§¡ the City shall ~þª~~¥grJg implement the tactics estaslisRes in tRe currently asepted Re¡¡ienal ^ir Q¡,¡ality Maintonanc;e Plan (/l.QM P) ªppJ@glê·..·~¡f:qîj·àl¡tY.·..·imþ¡§'!I~m~h~i§t"ªt~9i@§ªDª.·Pmgr~fi:i§~h~fmgef.·.§¡ê~9~~9 thósèêståblishêd.thróügh.thê··cuijél1!IYãdijpted·..R~ii:iijãl!Aii'QÛåLi!y!StråtégY/(RAQS)·..ål1i;1 i1iªgg§;~~.y~~~qµ~Íìtjmp~~9!?~q9(m~?~Hrê~¡············"· ..................................... . ......... .............................. ......... ... THRESHOLD: The Gity. B.Mg.Ç shall annually .~ providep the San Die¡¡e .^.PCD with a 12 to 18 meAth se'/elopmeAt ferecast and reE¡¡,¡est aA evaluatioA af its impact aA c¡,¡rreAt and fut¡,¡re air quality maAa¡¡emeAt ¡¡ro¡¡raFRs, alan¡¡ I':ith raceAt air quality data. The ¡¡rewtR mrecast and ,^,PCD resp8Ase letters sRall se l3r8vided to tRe GMOC for iAclusion iA its review. wi!f\ªª ··········l···············ff'·h'H··· . ......... .... annüareþoWJc : ......,...'.:.-;.-.......-:.;.;...-..-:.;..-....:.:.;.:.......:..'_._.;..-;.,.;-.-....;.;..-;.....;.: , , 1;IR¡9Y¡ª~§.··ª.!Îpyè¡YÎ~Y!...ªnd...~.yªI~~~i§¡j··.·§fJºªª1..~.~y~!Rpiil~rtp·r§~~c~~PRt9y~9. ......... dÜring tfièpribi.yearló determine fowhäterlèrifthey irriþlemérited méasÚres ª~~¡Qpédì9f9~t~r~Œ§6~1itY¡l11pr9Y~m~¡,¡(pi.i~µênt~q¡~j~YªBlr~g1(j¡i~Iªhª ïòc¡ilå¡fqûaHty¡mptt;)vérriëinr.strat~ièš; .-.--.-..................,..........-,....-....".........---.-.-.....-.....-...........'........._._-...-.-.._-....,-,...._'....-.-..............,.-......-...-,..................... ~~¡i@~i~!Ä~m~rl~I¡:WÎ~~f~~~~i[i~¡i~¡lil~I~~~~~~ti~~~Qii~~m~~1¡li statusofregiOÌ1áläifqi.íälityimpfoverriè"t.implemeòfãtîófiêffôrìS...ûl1der.ttièRegiòrÎalAir ~~~~'~~~~¡(IJi~~~~we~¡[:~CI~f~i~fi~~~~il~¡If~~fl!;~5\1~i~\r~~i~~~'~~~\~ /It?? ---.-.-.-...----- ~._- - - .~.,_.__._,--,..._.._.,---_. IMPLEMENTATION MEASURE: ~ Should the GMOC determine that a potentially serious problem exists with respect to any Þtt\)~~Þ9Y~ air quality iITiprqll~rrië"têffortsa~ eith~r~~lo~!9(ff'!9i9ni;¡J E:!,,~1:9rb9th, it may adopt a formal "Statement of Concern" within its annual report. Such a "Statement" requires the City Council to consider the adoption of a resolution reflecting that concern during the public hearing onthe GMOC's report¡qgpi.f:j~gf~gj'§~féiITig¡jk~h~!I~I~9 Ie be directed to ij:¡e ~nYiptr~f responsible public agencY(¡~~l with follow up to assure appropriate response by that agency(iê$). (3/14/95) (A:\GMOC·94\AO·THSRV.5TO) - ,/¡rJ' APPENDIX M /I tf9 "" '^" 11'-11 ",," ...." r~ ...., "'".11 ,_"-,",, ............."...., I ,... v, ,......, " ." 11111".... '''...."......'''' """-," "']":..1.-, ............, INTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE DATE: January 23, 1997 TO: Growth Management Oversight Commission VIA: John D. Goss, City ManagerV FROM: Robert W. ·Powell, Director of Financ~ SUBJECT: F1SCAL UPDATE - DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) The ·purpose of this report is to provide the Growth Management Oversight Co=ission (GMOC) with an update on the Development Impact Fee program of the City of Chula Vista. GENERAL - Pursuant to Government Code section 66000, the City has established a DIF program. The purpose of the City's DIF program is to identify public facilities and improvements required to support future development within the City's general planning area. Where an additional or enhanced facility need is created by future development, the associated cost is apportioned to future development in the form of a development impact fee. The City has several types of DIP's which were assessed during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996. The major categories of DIP's are transportation, traffic signal, park, drainage, sewer and public facilities. In many instances, the construction of a particular facility is triggered when development reaches a certain number of units or level of traffic generation. If development slows down, then the need for the facility is delayed. If development accelerates, then it also accelerates the need for facilities. Additionally,· it is not unusual for developers to advance fund and construct facilities for which they are given credit against payment of future development impact fees. FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 ACTIVITY Anached are financial reports that indicate the revenue and expenditure activity of each DIF Fund for FY 1995-96 and the Fund Balance in each as of June 30, 1996. The following Sllmm~ry co=ents are provided as additional information on each individual DIF category. ------ A90 ---~--_._-^ --"-_._".._-~------- FISCAL OVERVIEW -2- January 23, 1997 Transportation - This fee was adopted by the City to fInance and coordinate the construction of - new transportation facilities so that streets are built when needed. This fee is applicable to all new development east of 1-805. Prior to the program, streets were built by developers in a fragmented fashion with 6-lane facilities, necking down to 2-lanes and expanding back to 6 lanes again. In addition, there was a fairness issue since some developers fronted on large streets and others did not. Now all developers in the Eastern portion. of Chula Vista pay the same fee per dwelling unit and either the City constructs the street or a developer does, using the cost to offset the TransDIF fee at the building permit stage. This fee is currently set at $3,998 for single family residences, was last updated at the end of 1994, and will be updated in the near future due to the Otay Ranch annexation. The major expenditures from the Transportation DIF were for street improvements for Otay Valley Road Widening ($74,500), Otay Lakes Road ($66,800), 1-805 traffic interchange studies ($19,600), Traffic Monitoring Program ($43,600), and Bonita RoadJI-805 ($420,000). Interim Pre-SR125 - This fee was adopted by the City to fmance transportation facilities in the Eastern Territories that would be needed to provide adequate and safe transportation facilities if there are delays in the construction of State Route (SR) 125 by CALTRANS or others. The fee was adopted in January 1994, but implementation was delayed until January 1995. The fee co=encing in January 1995 was $820 per EDU. This fee will be updated in the near future for the annexation of the Otay Ranch. Traffic Siwal - This fee was adopted to provide for the projected traffic signal needs for the - City that result from increases in traffic volume caused by development. As funds are accumulated they are expended on traffic signal projects that meet the warrants at the time the funds are available. This is a city-wide fee with a FY95-96 rate of $13 per trip generated. Projects installed or funded during FY95-96 include traffic signals at Telegraph Canyon Road and Paseo Ladera, Otay Lakes Road and Gotham, 1-805 and Otay Valley Road, 1-805 and East Orange, and Main and Date. Additional projects included left turn signals at three locations and citywide traffic signal safety upgrades. Eastlake Park - This fee was adopted by the City to finance and coordinate the construction of new parks in the Eastlake I area which also encompasses the north half of Eastlake Greens. During FY95-96, the City and Eastlake revised the original agreement. Under the revised , agreement, the City has loaned the principal and interest from this fund to Eastlake at 3 % interest until July 1, 1999. When the funds are repaid, they will be used to build a co=unity center. Telegraph Canvon Drainage - This fee is applicable to all new development within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin. The FY95-96 fee was $3,922 per acre and pays for the construction of the Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo Ladera and the Eastlake Business Center and a portion of the channel west of! -805. . Expenditures for FY95-96 were associated with the Telegraph Canyon Channel Design. /f/9/ TISCAL OVERVIEW -3- January 23, 1997 TeJelITaph Canvon Gravity Sewer - This is a fee for the expansion of the trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. The FY95-96 fee was $184 per EDU. Expendimres for this DIF were only for staff administration of the DIP. Telegraph Canvon Pumped Sewer - This fee is collected for the expansion of the Telegraph Canyon trunk sewer to serve those properties outside of the basin. These flows are pumped into· the trunk line temporarily and it is anticipated they will ultimately drain to another basin, either Poggi or Salt Creek, by gravity. If Telegraph Canyon basin becomes built out, there may be no reserve capacity for the temporary pumped flows and a parallel system must be built. If, however, the capacity is never exceeded once the Telegraph Canyon gravity basin is built out and no parallel system is built because of the temporary flows, the funds will be returned to the current property owners. The FY95-96 fee was $560 per EDU. Salt Creek Sewer Basin - This fee was adopted in December 1994 to provide the necessary financing to construct the Salt Creek Interceptor. This fee is applicable to the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, that portion of the Upper ûtay Lake Basin north of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, and that portion of the Lower Otay Lake Basin east of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. The fee adopted was $284 per EDU. Expenditures during FY95-96 included construction of a portion of the Salt Creek Trunk Sewer Line in conjunction with SDG&E's Pipeline 2000 project. . Public Facilities - The Public. Facilities. DIF is a city-wide fee with several components levied ~ to fund that portion of public facilities projects attributable to new development. Prior to July 1993, the separate fee components collected for the different public facilities were placed in. separate funds. Funds from one facility component fund could not be used to finance projects of another facility component, regardless of the ·need for, or timing of the various projects. Loans were made from other City funds for project components with insùfficient cash. Under the current ordinance, fees collected after July 1993 for the separate fee components are consolidated in a single fund rather than in separate facility funds. Thus, the funds are available for whichever approved project is currently scheduled and interfund loanS are minimi7.ed. For FY95-96 the total fee for all components was $2,150 per EDU. The components of the Public Facilities DIF with the associated fee are as follows: Administration ($79) - Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program, overseeing of expendimres and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of costs, etc. This fee is set at 2 % of the other Public Facilities DIFs charged. Civic Center Expansion ($527) - Expansion of the Civic Center per the Civic Center Master Plan prepared in 1989, to provide sufficient building space and parking for the existing and anticipated staff and the public. The major expendimres in FY95-96 were for acquiring the EI Dorado Office Building '"--' at 215 "F" Street for Civic Center expansion ($1,175,000) and expansion of the Civic Center parking lot ($91,457). ,q9;l. ---,_._~-- "'-----.-.-.-"-- · FISCAL OVERVIEW -4- January 23, 1997 Police Facility ($235) - Acco=odation of the building space needs per the Civic Center Master Plan, which included upgrading of the co=unications center, construction of a new crime lab, office improvements and installation of new co=unication consoles. Also included is the purchase and installation of a new computer aided dispatch system (CAD), a new Records Management System, and new Mobile Digital Terminals. Corporation Yard Relocation ($515) - Relocation of the City's existing corporation yard from the bayfront area to a site more centrally located and of a larger size. The existing site is near capacity. Libraries ($544) - Improvements include construction of the South Chula Vista library and Eastern Territories library(ies), and installation of a new automated library system. FY95-96 expenditures were related to the new South Chula Vista Library, including expansion of the Library automation system. Fire Suppression Svstem ($141) - Projects include the relocation of Fire Station #4 & #3, construction of a fire training tower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig, expansion of Fire Station #1, installation of a radio corrununications tower and construction of an interim and pe=anent Station #6. The expenditures from this account were $6,684 for property tax reimbursement for the Eastlake interim fire station and $5,016 for restroom renovation in Station #1. Geoffaphic Info=ation Svstem ($49) - Purchase and installation of a GIS system for mapping of various base maps and creation of geo-data files to aid in planning and processing of land developments. This project is a multi-year installation project with F¥95-96 expenditures of $27,406. Mainframe Computer ($23) - Purchase and installation of a new mainframe computer and· various enhancements to meet existing and future needs for additional memory and storage space and enhanced processing speed. Minor expenses of $1,156 were expended on this project. Telephone Svstem Upffade ($32) - Upgrading and expansion of the City's existing telephone system to acco=odate growth, including installation of new conduit, wiring additional telephone lines, and a voice processing system. Expenditures during FY95-96 entailed $9,814 for general phone system upgrades. Records Manaæment System ($5) - Updating and modernization of the existing records system to prepare the City for anticipated increases in transactions and volumes of records. rl93 fiSCAL OVERVIEW -5- January 23, 1997 RESPONSE TO FY94-5 GMOC RECOMMENDATION In the FY94-5 Final Report, the GMOC recommended: "That the City Council ensure that adequate staffmg and resources are provided to conduct a review and necessary update of the DIP's every one to two years, to ensure the accuracy of projections, facility costs and other assumptions. This should include a requirement for inclusion of standard, five-year growth projections in each of the DIF updates. " On January 21, 1997, the City Council approved a consultant contract to complete an update of the Public Facilities DIP and the Fire Master Plan. The main thrust of the effort will be to incorporate the impacts of the Otay Ranch annexation but will include validation of other projections and assumptions. It is expected that both projects will be completed within the next six months and will include the standard five year growth projections. rr.:\dau.\m:mos\direaorigm0c97.rwp - 199~ --,---~-_.__._.- ..--_._,-,--_...~-_..- '" NNC 0 .". OOCDiñ'O .... 0 I"-I,."C "' I,[)..-..-Q' ~ '" -¡¡ 0 r--I.')t:! '" -¡¡ "'- "<::"1'-C7)tt)(D "' ci cicic:5 ci .... ~·r:ia5óc5 oi Õ N -",,,, .". Õ '" NC])COCOO) .". .... "'. -'"- "'. .... "! .....'" ~. "'. N "'. '" - '" .. '" '" '" ô'" '" '" ô C" ô '" C" "C - '" '" "E-oo '" '" ~ ~ N ~ ¡: 0 - o EN..... '" ~ .". 0&..... u Q)CJ) 1.0 .,¡ .". '" g:E= o:EMCO !::!. '" " " " 0 ¡;;-::;"M 0 " ô "' M'ÔM <D C E '" """'0 '" 5 E C) C') N "'<DO N ~Clo) -o_ N <D ........- N ÑÑ .c:..!.....o tIS <D- -.::--"':Ñ .,¡ --0 c.øO)I.O go ~~ - I» >OM CO ~ N -- 0 ã;'" ã;'" ~ '" <4 .... .... !::!. " - 0 ã)êD~ 0 " - õ> '" ... ... N Eo! '" N"'''' '" Eo! .... ~ a; '" <D 0 """, -~- ft ::HC CD '" ~ N N .:: C.o .:: Co..... 0 M oi !i oi '" -- £E~~ ~ "C .5Ecc '" ~ .... !::!. '" .... " " ° " ° " :E'-' :E'-' LL '" r::-êDM .!! E ;::- Ô C LL.~ .!!E 0 0 N '" ... .- .:: " '" -0_ .... .:: " N N m ~ Þ Õ=Ö 0.- .".... C.iñlDI' N .... <D ... "' ,,"'.... ,..:~ tIS Ö ci ,: Ñ Ii; "'''' - ""0 NN E~o;~ N ... - N N 0. "LL C> '" '" - ~ OM 1:0 '" 12 ~O ° ° !::!. '" 0. -g:ä ,,- ,,- Os. Os. ° LL" E a. .". oÕ> U) '" .... m .... '" .Q.c '" ~ ....'" m "' ... m 0 " :ë~ "., >. < "",CO .... "'N "! G:I(f. ~CD '" m ... 0 ?" '" "':N- - "- Q,..... 0 ,: .,¡ M oj " -= 0..0 '" -~ ... Ü:c.O)U) N '" ~ m :; " Õ LL 0. '" '" '" "M'" N .. N .::- " '" .. .. .... Õ -0. '" '" '" " =" "'-' w .Q ~ Q) w M"r::-O ;::-ã5'o u. 0 0 '" N '" ... '-=:COccn ... '" '" "''''''' .. '" .... "'N'" <D -šcp:£m ü " "'om -êMLO '" 0 ",mm '" < ";:'" -,..:,..: '" Ñ -0)-,...- ö 8""'.c ~ 0. "0 ,,~ 0 mE_ ::¡ .<;= <DCO - m '" <D U) CD<D N t'IJ>-°c - .e"'''' <4 ..,. U) '" ~¡: ~ ~ '" - ŒlLL 0 :J "'z £cô8cñ _w .....-1.() u Q) >::¡ "C ¡: ... '" U) N .2CDQ)ro~ <0.0 "C ¡: 0 a; C;; Q)~"'CCI)= s3J; - ° ~ ° U) .... 0 '" ,,- U) '" "< ~=N-':- '" m '" .... :g...:§ ê-g ZWCI >-ñí'O:t '" ,,; '" >-Rl..-o '" ,: M ,: m Cf) u. Q) Q) ü» 0.,,0 m .". ... c.. U 0) I.() N N '" '" Lt')->Q. u..WL:.. _0'" '" m õ.EMct) '" ... '" ..!.~"'CQ)X 00 0- .... '" ~ .. ~ CD.... C .... Q) >'" '-'~ '-'~ '" .... CI) 0 :::::I m ... ...!!! - - ° õ~ ¡¡;- ÑëD cB~-õ- ~ 0 0 0 <D ~-ª~.2§ ¡¡ '" '" " >. m m NM CD '" " >. - N N 0'" '" ro~tOJ!2~ u. O=M U =..... M tIS ",- ",- tIS -=.....0 jJ) .-.c: > ü --0 -ucnlt') ... m U) 0 .c: -c..,. -.- ::; õOcc °I'llMCO M <4 - N _ccnc"O 0.. " o..LL tn.2r;-ëij '" LL ~ ~ " !::!. .. ~ro~-ci-5 0. .2 (1)..... ~.> CD "'Ô .". 0 ....ê '" uro.....-- ~ .... "'... m - a; ..,. mo m .s..cra:ê"g B:N '": ..,.'" "< M m <DO m o (!).c.- OCJON 'ON >'ro-c .... añc:i .". '>1;.....0 ,: ....- Ôtn- 0 §CO~(;;C > "0 m ....... "' -mCJ:I1O '" M <DN M üëC '" .... CD c..>UMCO M ..,. !£. M --0 Q)(\J " ~ - .... .. .~ § &ê I/) IJ..- '-' .... .. .. ¡::LL..s~C E 0 E 11)0(");::- ~ ~ 0 CD "C '" '" "C 0 "=tT"".....,..... '" 0; <~ <"'- m co..... en (') 0 00 Ñ ttiaj~"": oi 0 -mon W ë'" ¡ (') co !::!. CDm !£. 0 .... " .. .... ~ 0 0 0 .... Z <D ~ <D '" m ð 0 ð '" ~ M ¡¡; = ¡¡; 0 D 0 0 z t? " Z u. Z 0 . '" õ 0 '" Õ m ~ m ~ .;, Z .;, Z m e w m 0 W m m ~ .... (/) 0 ~ ;:: '" Q ~ 0 t? 0 ~ 0 t? 0 w w Z ¡:::- ii w w z ii > ü Z w >- '-' 00- ¡:::- w ~ Z ::0 0.. ~ Z wZ ::0 a. < " 0 ...J 13 :5 "," 0 ...J '" ...J <(/)- < '" oo~~æŽ ¡¡: '" oowwZ ¡¡: < < ID wl-a::- ID ID ~..JI-a::~ ID u. t? :OZ::o'" Q u. Q Õ Õ t? Zoð Z:J a:: ;?; ZWI-a:: w Z wC/)wt::w w '" w::E-W .... '" .... w Z >1-0L1. Õ w Z >..J~OLL Õ '- ¡:: Z WC/)ZCI) ¡:: Z W<U)Zø ::; a::wLUZ :0 ::; (3 a::l-wWZ ::0 ¡¡ t? L1.>c-<t < ~ u..Z>D..< < < w -Zxa:: Z w õ~~[5g: Z u. ID O_WI- ::0 u. ID ::0 ü ü r19S- ::; ::; '" '" " " "- 0. ~ MNG' ~ 0 <D '" 0 "<t '" ~ '" ( "<t ...... <D N <D '" ,,)C), '" N N 0 ~ T"""_ CDþ N "<t ......"'''' '" N L'> ......"'"<t ,.: II> ~ c..f cD a) ~ "<t E'" '" ..,."'~ ~ 0> '" O"'N co .- N 1.") ,.., ...... ~ "co <D '" ~ 0 ........'" .... .... - "'N .... .... ~ - .!a:::cø ~ iii'" ~ .!:UJ .... .... .... c 0 00 ô 0 ...... 'o::tlt>O <D <D "'A 0 '" '" ..,. 0"'''' ~ a. 0_ <D. 0_ "<t <0. "'<0<0 "'. <ri" ",,- .ñ ~ II> '" '" '" 0 '" III co ..,. "" '" "<t~ 0 .... '" .. .... ~ N ...... ...... '" .... ....1D0 .... .... :::N .... ~ ü.......... III'" ~"'''' " iii~ W UJ'" UJ '" 0 I.D(J)~ '" ...... '" .... <0 ON co ..,. CON<D 0 co ~ "<t'" co 0 ~ ......,..,'" co '" >-11> co ",N <0. ::: r:£-.:ir-: 0; .ñ ü~ 0; a5..f .. '" '" N ~ "<t ~<O'" ~ ...... "<:UJ", "<t '" '" ........ "<t_ lD_N q ~ 0."0 N .... .... .... ON .ñ 0.", "<t ~ ~ EQ)cø CJ) III .... .... ~ .... 0>0. ill '" ~E ill " «u.. .... '" ::> f-f- f- f-Q. ~Ü >< ~~ MN¡:::- 0 It)C::>T"""Q N '" ...... «Q.", iii '" -.:::t'O>c::ItO '" '" ~ "'<O"<t N ...J:2", <0. CD V M.,.... N >- <0_ "'......'" <0 ::>-. '" tñ..¡tñiD C'Õ ü>- ò..;- Ñ .~ '" ...... I.-a; '" or--.-o '" .c:::,.... '" N co UZ>- CJ).... ...... "<t <D <0 .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ .... o.>N ILWIL ON ~ECD 0:2 ::: g>C) - Q. .. >-0 .... ãi f-...J f- f- -W Ü> ill 0 <0 <0 '" '" 0 0 '" ,.., - - <0 <0 0 0 CJ CJ Z Z 0 0 OCD Z OCD Z W W L'> Ü:2 0 '" Ü:2 0 C) >::> 0 C) >::> 0 - Wü - Wü ~ æ ~ æ 0 Oz e Oz - (/) WW W ...... (/) WW W ...... 0.. 0.. 0 CJ ~c:: 0 CJ ~c:: W Z ~«O W W Z ~«O W ü - f-...JIL Ü Ü - f-...JIL U Z Z ::>f- Z Z Z ::>f- Z « c:: O(/» « « c:: D(/» « ...J « ~«(/) ...J ...J « ~«(/) ...J « (/)W¡ZZWW « « CJ)W¡ZZWW « CD Wf-C::-OC:: CD CD Wf-C::-OC:: CD CJ ::>Z::>(/)f-Z 0 CJ ::>Z::>(/)f-Z 0 Z ZWf-C:: - W Z ZWf-C:: - W W::;:_WW~ f- W::;:_WW~ !:: Z >f-OILUU 15 Z >f-OILÜU 0 Z W(/)ZUJZW ::> ~ W(/)Z(/)ZW ::> C::wWZ«O C::WWZ«O CJ IL> 0.. «> (3" « CJ IL>o..~>(3" « W -ZXC::OZ Z W -ZX Oz Z CD O_Wf-«_ ::> CD O_Wf-«_ ::> ,_/ 19 '11, - - - - APPENDIX N /997 - -- ---. - - -- ---- - - ---.-- -- .. -< -- ---"- MEMORANDUM ( February 12, 1997 File No. 061O-95-GY 051 TO: Robert Leiter, Director of Planning VIA: Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Director of Public Works! City Engin? FROM: William A. Ullrich, Seruor Civil Engineer wru1. SUBJECT: Response to addition questions raised by the Growth Management Oversight Committee (GMOC) in November 1996. The GMOC requested that additional issues relating to traffic be addressed along with the 1996 TMP report. Following is a discussion of the traffic related items which were asked to be addressed by the GMOC which are not already included in the TMP report. REQUEST 1. Provide an overview and update on the finalization and adoption of proposed "Development Phasing and Morutoring" policies as they relate to advance management of available street system capacity. ~ RESPONSE: The item went to City Council on July 23,1996 for consideration. Council accepted the report and directed staff to fine tune the ordinance revisions and bring the item back to them: Staff proposes to complete the process by June 1997. For more detail on the proposed program a copy of the July 1996 staff report is attached. REQUEST 2 Provide an overview/explanation of how traffic modeling is conducted, and what tYPe oflong-range modeling of area traffic conditions the City has recently conducted, and will be conducting in the future. . RESPONSE: Recent traffic modeling has utilized SANDAG's Series 8 Model to project traffic in our area. The model includes development for the all of San Diego County (Regional ) . Model) and is fine tuned for the area being studied (Subregional Model). The fine tuning includes adjusting the development assumptions included in the model to reflect more precise information as a result of approved: development projects, Specific Plans, Tentative Maps and Final Maps. In addition, the circulation streets included in the model can be coded to reflect currènt roadway configurations or future configurations including totally new streets. The Series 8 model includes subareas where types of uses and estimated trip generation are more precisely determined. These subarea are called Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ). The Series 8 Model includes over 4000 TAZ's. ~ .. Once the land use is updated to reflect the most current development information in each TAZ within the Subregional Model, a run is completed to determine the distribution of trips on the existing , . \.~ A- '1ð / "U____"'____.._.._. _.__..___ __._______"___ .- GMOC 1996 2 February 12, 1997 transportation network. These trip projections are compared to ground counts and adjustments are made to make the model compare closely with the existing traffic counts. After the existing condition subregional model is calibrated, changes to the model to include future development and addition circulation network can be added to detennine the impact on an assumed system. The best example of this process would be the phasing analysis that was performed for Otay Ranch SPAr. That analysis did traffic projections for the years 2000, 2005 and 20ID. Each projection assumed additional development in various parts of the City assuming approximately 1400 dwelling units a year would be constructed. In addition, the model assumed a proportion of area outside of the study area which was undeveloped would also be constructed. Each Phase made assumptions as to the circulation system (network) that would be available during that time trame. The roadways and major intersections were analyzed as to Level of Service (LOS) under the assumptions made. This was done for all three periods of time. This analysis was used to determine which street improvements needed to be completed at various levels of development ofOtay Ranch SPA I (Note that the traffic runs were done based upon SR- 125 not being available, a worst case scenario). The San MIguel Ranch project wilI have to do something similar to Otay Ranch SPA I to detennine roadway improvements necessary to serve their project as part of their SPA approval. The City wilI also perform additional traffic projection runs when updating the Transportation Phasing Plan TPP and the Transportation Development Impact Fee emIF) to include the western 9000+ acres of Otay Ranch being annexed into the City. REQUEST 3 Discuss anticipated schedule and range of issues to be addressed for the next update of the Phasing Plan (TPP). RESPONSE The last actual update of the TPP identified all of the minor road improvements that would be needed up to the point that a facility within the SR-125 corridor is needed. The TPP then indicated that none of the remaining DIF streets would relieve problems without that facility. The City then had a study done for an Interim SR-125 Development Impact Fee (SRl25DIF) which would allow funding of interim facilities within the SR-125 corridor if the Tollway/freeway could not be built. This· SR125DIF study also phased the needed interim improvements. Because the SR"125 facility is such a major need and controls all of the future growth, there is no need for a further update to the TPP Until SR-125 (or some interim facility) is assured. While the Otay Ranch will require an update to the TDIF all the roads will still feed into the ultimate network identified in the previous TPP. Therefore, no immediate update to the TPP is planned. REQUEST 4 Provide status report on planning and implementation for SR125, including ", proposed schedules, and any related bearing on the City's Interim Facility program. -. ¡::¡ q e¡ GMOC 1996 3 February 12, 1997 RESPONSE The ErR for SR-125 has been released and the public review period has concluded. The fInal EIR has not been prepared because there is not a consensus between Caltrans, the Federal Highway Administration and some elected officials on the preferred route. The final EIR will be prepared when consensus is reached. Caltrans could not give a defInitive time for this to occur but felt that it could happen within a couple of months (By the end of April 1997). Once the alignment is agreed upon, the fInal EIR will be processed. The next step would be preparation of construction drawings and obtaining financing. Construction is anticipated to begin in late 1998 with the opening by late 2000. The City's Interim SR -125 program will not be necessary ifSR-125 is constructed. The SR-125 fee program will have to be eliminated and disposition of funds acquired' through that program determined by the City Council. As a result of SR- 125 construction, many of the Public Facilities Financing Plans (PFFP) for developments such as Salt Creek Ranch, Sunbowand Otay Ranch SPA I may end up revised as a result of requests by the developers to amend those doctunents because the PFFP's were prepared without consideration of SR-125 being constructed. The Engineer's report for the Interim SR-125 Facility concluded that there would probably be no need for the interim facility prior to 1999. Since development has been at a much slower pace than asstuned in that report, the need for the interim facility will be closer to the year 2003 unless construction increases signifIcantly. REQUEST 4 Discuss efforts to ensure adequate funding and staffing for ongoing traffic monitoring and forecasting programs. l , - RESPONSE The funding for these programs comes from the TDIF and SR-125 program. Therefore funding should be available if development continues. If development does not continue the need for such continued in-depth monitoring is lessened. If the revision to the Growth Management Program and Ordinance are adopted by Council, the requirement to perform a traffic analysis prior to approval of a fmal map to determine if the roadway system can absorb the additional traffic will provide a continuous process to monitor traffic. This alone with the annual TMP and traffic projections done for San Miguel Ranch and EastLake III should provide sufficiept information on the ability of the roadway system to handle additional traffic as well as provide information about the need to add to or improve the circulation system. Staffing to prepare extensive reports to the GMOC is not available at this time. Existing staff is adequate to review traffic projections prepared by City consultants or developer's consultants. The Traffic Engineering section has been reduced in recent years as a result of tight budgets. Staffhas received instructions to maintain the existing budget for FY 97-98. Therefore staffhas not requested any additional staff. M:\HOMElENGINEERITRAFFIaGM0C97.W AU ,~' ;:¡ It? 0 "-..__._._,~-_...."------ --.. MEMORANDUM February 12, 1997 File: 0610-95-GY05l 0735-10-TF236 \ TO: Bob Leiter, Director of Planning VIA: C~iff Sw~nson, Deputy Public Works Director~ CJ.ty·EngJ.neer FROM: William Ullrich, Senior Civil Engineer~ SUBJECT: 1996 Traffic Monitoring Program Final Report - GMOC Annual Review of Threshold Compliance This report is' being forwarded to the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) to summarize the results of the 1996 Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP). This program assesses the operating performance of the City's arterial street system for compliance with the Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan. These Threshold Standards specify that Level of Service (LOS) C or better, as measured by observed average travel speed, shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments except that during peak hours LOS D can occur for no more than any two hours of the day. Threshold ComDliance Findinqs ~ This year's Study indicates that all arterial segments evaluated during each time period operate at LOS C or better; therefore, the Threshold Standards have been met for the 1996 TMP. This year's TMP evaluated arterial segments from last year's program which were operating at LOS C or less, as well as segments where traffic volumes have increased 10% or more since the segment was last studied for a previous report. Also,additional segments were studied where new traffic signals have been built which significantly affects the operational characteristics of the roadway. H St.jEast H St., from I-5 to Rutgers Ave., was also evaluated to provide the most current information possible for this traffic corridor. The following table summarizes the results of the 1996 TMP showing the number of arterial segments, listed by classification, which conform to each Level of Service during each of the three time periods studied (AM, Mid-day and PM). For more details, please refer to Attachment 1. This attachment presents the 1996 TMP resul ts for each time period for H St., East H ·St., and each LOS C arterial segment comparing this information to the corresponding 1995 data (or the most recent data collected) for each segment listed. \/ A /11 ~ . ._"__..,.~~__"__, _ w._.···_~_..____"·_____ M-96TMP 2 February 12, 1997 1995 TMP ÞRTERIAL PERFORMANCE ALL TIME PERIODS AM PERIOD 7AM-9AM CLASS LOS I II III TOTAL A 2 - - 2 A/B* 2 1 - 3 B - - 4 4 B/C* - 1 1 2 C - 1 - 1 C/D* - - - - D-F - - - - MID-DAY PERIOD 11:30 AM - 1:30 PM CLASS LOS I II III TOTAL A , 2 - - 2 A/B* 1 - - 1 R - - 2 2 B/C* - ·2 - 2 C - - 3 3 C/D* - - - - D-F - - - - PM PERIOD 4PM-6PM CLASS LOS I II III TOTAL A 1 - - 1 A/B* 1 - 2 3 B 1 1 2 4 B/C* - 3 2 5 C - - 3 3 C/D* - - - - D-F - - - - * Indicates segments operating at different - LOS's in different directions. ,q/ð3 M-96TMP 3 February 12, 1997 Current Relevant Issues Related to Threshold ComDliance of the arterial segments studied this year, the following segments ¡ were found to operate in the lower half of the LOS C range of , average travel speeds: 1. Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H St.) operates in the lower half of the LOS C range of average travel speeds for 2 'hourš during the day in the northbound direction. Northbound speeds during these times range from 13.8 to 15.7 MPH which are below the mid-range speed of 16 MPH for å class III arterial segment. In the southbound direction, this segment operates in the lower half of LOS C for 1 hour during the day. Average southbound (LOS C) speeds range from 14.6 to 15.1 MPH which are below the 16 MPH mid-level LOS C speed for this arterial classification. The TMP is intended to measure the operating efficiency of arterial streets in the City. Arterial streets are defined in the Traffic Element of the General Plan as surface highways having a signal spacing of less than two miles with average weekday traffic volumes greater than 10,000 vehicles per day. Because of the existing characteristics of Third Ave. from C St. to H St., this segment should not be considered an arterial segment for the purposes of the Traffic Monitoring Program. Traffic volumes on Third Ave. between C St. and E St. are currently 7240 vehicles per day and have not exceeded 10,000·' vehicles per day since 1989. \ Between E St. and G St. the traffic volumes range from 11,290 ~ to 15,150 vehicles per day, but this portion of Third Ave. is also designated as the downtown central business district. The speed limit in this area is 25 MPH, angle parking along both sides of the street restricts Third Ave. to one lane in each direction between E St. and F St., and wide sidewalks with large planters exist which' narrow the, approaches to intersections at Davidson St., F St. andG Street. Only the portion of Third Ave. from G St. to H St_ is outside of the downtown central business district and carries sufficient traffic to be considered an arterial street for the,purposes of the TMP. Thereforè, it is recommended that Third Ave. from C St. to G St. be exempted from the Threshold Standards and be removed as an arterial segment from the TMP. Third Ave. from G St. to R St. would become part of the TMP segment currently studied between R St. and Naples St. and would continue to be studied as part of the TMP. 2. Otay Lakes Rd. (East H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) operates in the lower half of LOS C for 1 hour during the day in the northbound direction of travel. Speeds range from 18.7 to 20.3 MPH which are below the mid-range LOS C speed of _21 MPH for this class II arterial sègment. The City has a CIP project· under design for the intersection of East H St./ Otay Lakes Rd. to construct duel left turn .~ lanes for northbound and southbound traffic on Otay Lakes Rd. ,&I/ð/{ -,-,~~,_.'..._.. -...--. --- M-96TMP 4 February 12, 1997 Construction of this project is currently scheduled for summer 1997. Once completed, this project will improve the LOS for Otay Lakes Rd. by increasing the capacity of the intersection. 3. Palomar St. (1-5 NB Ramps - Broadway) operates in the lower half of LOS C for 1 hour in the eastbound direction and for 3 hours in the westbound direction during the course of the day. Average travel speeds vary from 13.5 to 14.1 MPH eastbound and from 13.5 to 15.3 MPH westbound. These speeds are below the mid-range speed of 16 MPH for a Class III arterial. Delay along this segment primarily occurs at the 1-5 northbound ramps and occasionally at the signalized intersections of Murrell Dr. /Palomar St. and Industrial Blvd. /Palomar Street. There are currently two future CIP pròjects planned for Palomar St. west of Industrial Boulevard. One project would provide topographic mapping and traffic data to Caltrans for the preparation of a project study report for the I-5/Palomar St. interchange. The second project would construct the ultimate st~eet improvements on Palomar St. from Industrial Blvd. to the 1-5 northbound ramps. In addition to studying arterial segments, the 1996 TMP assessed the LOS of the arterial interchange segments which were found to operate at LOS D by the 1995 TMP. Additional studies were also done on H St. at 1-5 and East H St. at I-80S to maintain current information at these locations. The results of this year's TMP indicate that along I-80S, each segment studied is operating at LOS C or better except for the eastbound direction of East H St. at 1- 805 which operates at LOS D from 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM in the evening. Along 1-5, all segments studied are operating at LOS C or better except for the following segments which operate at LOS D: E St. (Bay - Woodlawn) 4 - 5 PM WE H St. (Bay - Woodlawn) 11:30 AM - 1:30 PM WE' H St. (Bay - Woodlawn) 4 - 6 PM WE' Palomar St. (Bay - Industrial) 4 - 5 PM EB' & 5 - 6 PM EB * Operating in the lower 1/2 of LOS D Further analysis· of the collected data (see Attachment 4) indicates that westbound H St. at 1-5, is functioning at the lower limit of LOS D (within 1 MPH of LOS E) from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM and at LOS E (0.2 MPH below LOS' D) from 5:00 PM to 5:30.PM. Although these segments are not subject to the City's.Threshold Standards, they ·were evaluated to maintain current data for information purposes. Using existing guidelines which consider LOS A through D as acceptable for arterial interchange segments, all the segments studied this year were found to operate at acceptable Levels of Service except for westbound H St. at 1-5 which operates at LOS E (0.2 MPHbelow LOS D) between 5 PM and 5:30 PM. This LOS A I~.Ç _u_ _ __ I~-96T!JjP _u __ ___ 5 February 12, 1997 E condition (8.8 MPH) , however, is not considered significant because the average travel time across this short (883') segment is only 68.1 seconds. \ As part of this yéar's study, the classification of the arterial interchange segment at I-805 and Otay Valley Rd. was reevaluated subsequent to the construction of traffic signals at the northbound and southbound ramps at this interchange. As a result of this evaluation, the segment was reclassified from a class I to a class II segment. Class I segments are characterized by free flow traffic speeds that range from 35 MPH to 45 MPH. These segments have less than 4 signals per mile, no parking and generally no access to abutting properties. Class II segments have free flow traffic speeds that range from 30 to 3"5 MPH, there are from four to eight traffic signals per mile, there is some parking and access to abutting properties is limited. Although there is no parking along this short portion of Otay Valley Rd. and the free flow traffic speeds are characteristic of a class I segment, the new traffic signals bring the equivalent number of signals per mile to seven and there is limited access to existing abutting properties. The addition of these signals at I-80S and Otay Valley Rd., therefore, makes this roadway more characteristic of a class II segment than a class I. For this reason, this segment has been reclassified from a class I to class II arterial interchange segment and was restudied during this year's program. Response to Recommendations from the 1995 GMOC Final Report I Recommendation 1. That the City Council direct the Engineering '-..:- Division to continue to include 5 to 7 year performance projections for major streets, such as H Street, as part of its annual reporting to the GMOC. Response: The Public Works Department, Engineering - Division, proposes to continue its annual Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) , and periodic update of the City's Transportation Phasing Program (TPP). In addition, the Engineering Division will use traffic projections prepared for other projects such asOtay Ranch SPA I, the Otay River Crossing fee study and the baseline forcasts used to propose modification to the Growth Management Program to project performance of maj or arterials. Results indicated in those traffic projections will be indicated in the annual report if a problem is identified. Recommendation 2. That the City.Council actively support plans for development of the full SR-125 freeway or tollway facility. Response: In adopting the Interim SR-125 Financing Study, Council recognized ~ the need for the full facility to meet the buildout circulation A /~(, --"._--_._"--+-----_._---~-- H-96TM:" __._ 6 February 12, 1997 needs of developments within the City's General Plan Area. On September 10, 1996, Council adopted Resolution 18431 directing staff to make comments to Caltrans on the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Statement (EIR/EIS) for the SR-125 Tollway/Freeway project and selecting Alternative la, from Table S-l of the Draft EIR/EIS (which includes the Citizen's Advisory Committee/Horseshoe Bend and Brown Field Modified alignments) as the preferred alignment for the SR-125 facility. In addition, Council has approved a contract with the firm of Smith & Kempton which requires, in part,that firm work as the City's advocates to tract funding for SR-125 and to attempt to obtain additional funding for ) tne facility with SANDAG and at the State and Federal levels. Proposed Actions for the Current Year For the 1997 TMP, Traffic Engineering staff will use the same. methodology used for the 1996 study. Therefore, the 1997 TMP will study the following segments: + arterial segments from the 1996 study that operated at ~ LOS C, + arterial interchange segments from the 1996 study that operated at ~ LOS D, + segments where traffic volumes have increased 10% or more (atcany count station along the segment) since the segment was last studied for a previous TMP report, + segments where major street widening has occurred and/or where new· traffic signals have been constructed which significantly affect the operational characteristics of the roadway, + H St./East H St., from 1-5 to Rutgers Ave., (to provide the most current information possible for this traffic corridor) . For the 1997 TMP, the arterial segment on Third Ave. from 4th Ave./C St. to H St. will be revised. That portion of Third Ave. (from C St. to E St.) which carries less than 10,000 vehicles per day will be removed as an arterial segment from the TMP. It is recommended that Third Ave. (from E St. to G St.), which comprises the central downtown business district, be exempted from the Threshold Standards and also be removed as an arterial segment from the TMP. Third Ave. from G St. to H St. would become part of the segment currently studied between H St. and Naples St. and would continue to be studied as part of the Traffic Monitoring Program. Conducting the 1997 TMP in this way will minimize the extensive field work required for the program while still providing the information necessary to monitor changing traffic conditions in the field. A/IJ7 r1-96TMP 7 ï=:ebruary 12, 1997 -- - ---- ------------------ Attachments; 1 - Arterial Segment LOS Comparison (1995 VS. 1996) ( 2 - 1996 TMP Arterial Segment LOS {All Time Periods} 3 - 1996 TMP Arterial Segments Operating at ~ Mid LOS C 4 - 1996 TMP Arterial Interchange Segments Operating at 5. Mid LOS D (M:\HOME\ENGINEER\TRAFFIC\M-96TMP.SM) \- '----' ¡t/ /0/ -,---.-..-....-..--- ._-~._~- , N c: 51 "'I"- uu UU '-<1"- N... ID", ZZ ZZ "\I,., ...ID ;¡::> "'N NO '-<N .-<.-< ....N ........ . 0 ~ . '" c:J", ~o.. '" C/J ID '" C/J H '" '" 0 1"-'" .-<.-< ...'" "'''' "'''' H .-< H . "'''' ...... "'''' IDN .-<'" '" - .....-< NN "'''' NN NN '" '0 '" ~c:J'" .... :>'" 'U «0.. U01 0101 01« O1U UU '" C/J .... '" , .... Z C/J J.< 0 I"- 0 ., C/J H '-' H J.< 0: .,; .,; 0.. C ::E: ,...¡ 0 0 U ID .... -'" . . . . '-' oW C/JO'" N~àl r-r- 0", '-<ID ID ID "'... '" ¡:: 00.-< "'''' "'''' ...'" 0'" ID'" () ;¡::> .-<'" IDID "'''' 0.... ....... .... QJ HH .... NN N... NN .-<.-< ..... .å 0: .... ~'~CJ) Zo..:> '" u '" '" II! ::E:~'" ~'O '" "-- '", ....-< ...'" "'.... "'... '" '" .... oW c:J '" "'" () oW "'-'" m~~ r-o r-... IDO) "'''' .-<... .0: C/J .-< '-<N NN "'''' NN NN '" ~ , ., on '" '" '" C/J .... H '" 0 U01 ";01 .,;.,; UU U¡¡¡ > 0: '" .... H ., f-< J.< 0: ~"O '" .,; "'" "'''' r-... 0'" .-<.-< ID'" . :>'" '-' "''';0.. "'0 IDID "'''' N'" 0'" C C/J '-<N NN "'''' NN NN ., , E rn r- C/J ., 0 ¡¡¡O1 .,;« .,;.,; UU UU J.< '" H " 0 J.< ;¡: 0 ..... ~I ¡¡¡¡¡¡ O1¡¡¡ IDID IDID IDID J.< "'3: OJ 3: OJ 3: "'3: ZC/J ., '" Q, ., '-' '" '" ., ;;¡ .... .,.., .... '" C ::E: '" .'-' '" >, ID C J.< U C '" -0 C/J '" "0 0 .... "'''' "'ID rn", : oM ., 3 J.<... '" U '-'", ..... I"- .,"''-' .... 0 3: ;;¡ 0 't:I., 0 ~JJCCJ) .c:ò '" C/Ju 0:", ø:f-<r- IOrtt:30 f-<", 'U . ,Z ,.N "',.... OOH HZ '" U '...... '-' '-' ]~....... oW'" '" '...... "''''...... "'oW...... .,....¡ 0'\ JJ 0'\ , 01. Z. C. m C/J. 1:0'\00'\ ZO "'0 =: 0 =:OJO ..:¡ 0 ::>r-IZrt . ID . J.<.-< "'0) '" ;¡:", '-''''''' +'..-1 I.D '-'0.... '-'UN >. '" "', 0 ",.c: "'''' 0 "'3: '" 0 HI"- f-<o "'H... "'C/JO '-''''''' u. =:-N =:-... 1>1-'" 1>1-", 0-.-< n'Q'Z .. ~ A lIt) --.-..-.--.-.... -......-..-.-.-----..- ------< -- .--- ~ ._.__u ____. ____~__._.__ __. -.-----.. ----------..--... ---'. ---. - - .-- N~~ "'111 N..,. UU UU "'M "'''' ..,.0 0'" MN ZZ ZZ "'''' 0'" ..,...,. ;¡:> "'''' 0..,. N..,. NM ON MM "'N MM MM NN , ::s::s- " a,¡p" '(:.¡:J "'..,. c:>", OO~Q.¡ ..,.'" "'''' MM .. .. NM '" M U) 0\ 0 UU "'" "'''' "'''' "'''' "'0 II1N - 0\ ,..:¡ H M "''' "'..,. "N "'''' "'''' "'''' H MM NN "'''' NN NN MM '" , '" ¡¡¡::s-." '" "'c:>'" ..,.'" UU aJaJ "¡;aJ aJU UaJ UU rl >'" U OO~c.. 111..,. "'''' MM ., rl .. -, c: '" MN 0 -.... Z .-<.-< U) N " 0 UU ., U) ,..:¡ "0 .u H ., " ~ ., .,¡; '" - '" '" ::s_ c: ,... 0 ;¡: 0 U"", '" -.... 0", . . . . . . . . . . . . ::s .u .¡J U)H", N~61 N'" "''' 1110 N'" "'111 "'" ..,.'" '" ¡::: O~M .-<" 1110 111'" 0'" "'M "'N "'111 II1"OU ,..:¡'" ;¡:> 111111 00 0111 .-<'" "'0 .-<'" "'N N ( J.,..¡ Q) '" . .-<.-< NN "'N "'''' '-<N .-<.-< '-<N .u..... ~ "':..U) [IJ ¡::.,..¡ .,,, '" t.1 Z.,¡;> , "00'" It! ~OUì ::s::s- " "U '" \ Pdl.. '00 ..,." "'''' '-<0 ..,..-< 111'" ..,.'" N", rl rl -~ .¡J c:>'", c:>", ","", U.uU .¡J tl)H.-< OO~p" 111111 "0 "'.-< "'''' 0'" "'''' "'" c: 0 ~ ::;: "'''' tI) .-<.-< '-<N NN "'''' N'-< NN .-<.-< HZ"O ~- .. .. ., N'-< '" Il1 .-< U) -.... H 0\ 0 UU UaJ aJaJ "¡;aJ UU UaJ UU U> ~ '" '" ,..:¡ + Z" ... M " , ~ ¡¡¡::s-." '" .,¡; "'c:>'" "'" "'111 .-<..,. "''' "'" ..,..-< N'" . >'" .u OO~P.. "'''' "" 111", ..,..-< N'-< "'..,. 111111 c: "'''' .-<.-< .-<.-< NN "'''' NN NN .-<.-< ., .. .. E '-<N Dl .-<.-< U) ., 0 UU UU "¡;aJ aJaJ UU UaJ UU " '" ,..:¡ " 0 " ;¡: 0 ..... 81 aJaJ aJaJ aJaJ aJaJ aJaJ aJaJ aJaJ I-< ZU) "'~ "'~ w~ w~ ZU) w~ ., "0 '" ., .u '" '" ., " rl 'n ..... "0 . - c: ::s '" - .u '" :>, :>, aJ c: " U '" c: '" .uo -0 tI) W "0 . 0 "0 ..... '" tI)" "0", Dl", . "", "0", " ;¡:';. "..,. 111 U .u", . rl " "'.-< ., '" ..... 0 ~ " . "0., _ o _ ".uti) '" .r;: . '" U)u ~'" ø::::E-i_t""- ".-< "''''0 '.'-< ...0 'u . ,z . ,N 10''-< ~aJM ",..:¡ . '" HZ '" ...u..... '..... ~CC........ ~JJ........ .. ...... ""..... .u..,.1I1 . >U) , ..... .>:.u '..-iCt\C'\ ..; . aJ. Z. C:. nS tI). I-< IX>. C:"'''' UO Zo 't10 ;¡: 0 ;¡:wo ..:I 0 nSZo ::>M.-< "".......,. '" . ".-< 111'" '" ;¡:'" a '" k.r;: '" . .J1I1'" . .J....'" . .JO'-< . .JUN >. 111 OIl1N ......u "', - ",.r;: 10'" - 1O~ - nS - rl' - - .r;:..,.", H" ...0 nSH..,. nStI)O . .Jw", nSH..,. . E-<-.-< ;¡:-N ;¡:-..,. r<I-1I1 r<I-", 0-.-< "'-'" .-<..,. . -.- ,¿:¡ /II ____ . ___n________ _~___._.. _ . - - _._------ ----.. -- .---- '- \P >41 . . "'0 \PCO N\P O\P 00 . ~O r-CO 00<", 0", CO 00< UU UU \PN "''''> N.., NO 00<'" "'N ZZ ZZ Or- 00<00< "'N NOO< NN NOO< ::;:- 0 \D '" '", '" "'" '" U)~~ 00< , OJ t: '" U) 0 0 "'N \POO< ..,0 COr- ·COOO< OCO OO<N N >4 \Pr- r-.., COCO r-'" ... \P ..,.., ..,00< "0 ::;:"'0 00<00< NN 00<00< 00<00< NN ..,.., NN OJ OJ "'''''' a. >'" '" ",o<:a. uu o:¡U UU Uo:¡ o:¡o<: o:¡o:¡ UU U) :>: , '" U) ::;: Z '" 0 0 '" U) >4 N H « '" 0<: OJ '" "0 ::;: :J ri 0 rl U \P U -'" t: +J U)O'" . . " " . . . . H ¡:: 0000< \P >4/ N.., r-O "'\P "'CO OCO ..,r- "'N '::;:0 r-oo< COCO "'\P ..,0 "'00< NO Or- ( ) >4H "'a.> "'\P "'''' O\P NOO< r-CO 0... r-CO ] « 00<00< ..,00< NOO< NN "'N "'.., NOO< + E-<"'U) Za.> U '" ::;:-0 '--~ lIS ::;:::;:1f! '" .'" "'CO "'... "'''' "'\P 00<.., "'CO +J ""'''' "'" +J "'-'" \P~~ \P'" "'CO r-CO 0.., N... ..,00< ~ U) 00< 00<00< 00<00< 00<00< NN ..,.., NN ~ . In H '" '" U) " " "0 '" '" 0 UU ro '" o:¡U UU o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ UU OJ '" 00< >4 rou E-< "'\P Ut: '" - NN ro :J 0<: ::;: '0 00 "'''''' O\P r-oo< NO N... N\P 000< U >'" '" "'0<:'" r-", o:¡o:¡ COCO \Pr- N.., 00<00< "'N "'U U) 00<00< 00<00< 00<00< NN ..,.., NN "'0 , oo<Z ... U) 0 UU UU UU o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡U U >4 "'z ~I o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ zu) "'3: "'3: "'3: "'3: "'3: "'3: ~ - ¡;; U '" ::;: U >4 o:¡ t: H U)o U· -0 U) '" '"0 t: :>:r- >0 "00 "O\p olco '... UN HN H... '" U Uco .., '" ......, ..... 0 3: :J _ '" ro ,..; 'r- .c: .c: - CO U)u "'.., HU . 00< ."'.., E-<'" E-<~ 'U . ,Z . ,N ro ro . N HZ 0 QJU...... "0....... , '...... .¡J .¡J '" >U) '" ...... , ...... "'o:¡...... "'.u...... .uN ..; . "" o:¡ o:¡. Z. t:. ....'" UO "00 ZO ZO "00 = 0 ="'0 t:'" "'......... .urlN . '" . \P . HOO< "'CO '" Poo< k.c:.., .,.¡.....'" .¡J1f!0 .¡J1f!", .¡J....\P .¡J000< .¡JUN .,.¡.u t:.... - "', - "" - ",.c: "'CO "'3: - - J::",'" 03:N H... Hr- E-<o "H... ..U)O ........-- E-<-oo< 11I-'" ¡'¡-N =-N :>:-... ¡,¡-", ¡,¡-.., OO<N ¡:¡ /I¿ - -_..'-_..~-- -...--- -------,.,- ~---_._--_._+-_._--~---..~------~ -- ---- - -. --_.- --. - -- ~- . --- .0 HI ~ri NN 0.0 ':EO ~" "" 00"> ~"'> "'N N~ "'''' ri ri riri NN :E' 0 10 '" . OJ "''' "'"' '" °OJ 0"> ~~~ 0", "'~ ri NN riri , - "' '" H 0 "0"> UC:¡ UU H H "'ri '" :E -. 0 riN '" '" "'OOJ "0"0 "''' ..... >OJ U ",<1:'" UC:¡ 0", "'''' '" NN riri ..... , '" -... Z ~ '" " 0 UU UU Q) 0 H '-' '" " H <1: ~ <1: '" " :E 0 M 0 -... U .0 '-' -0"> . .J "'00"> . . Ln~ . . '" ¡:: OOri .0 HI "'" "'N U ':EO ",.0 0.0 NN .... QJ HH ~"'> "'N N", "'ri ..... ] ~ riri ri ri N'" .... E-<OJ'" '" Z"'> U OJ '" rtI :E:E"' :E - 0 '" '- -~ '" . OJ ""' ",N ",.0 ..... . .J 0"'0"> °OJ U . .J OJ-'" U)~~ 0'" "'"' ~.o ~ '" ri Nri riN riri 'Ö :i! , Q) "' '" '" "' CI) .... H '" 0 c:¡c:¡ UC:¡ UU > ~ ri H Q) OJ " E-< :;¿ :E '. 0 '" "'OOJ "ri riri .o~ , >OJ '-' 10<1:'" 0">'" 0">.0 1010 " '" riri riN riri Q) , E 01 ~ '" Q) 0 C:¡U UC:¡ UU '" H Q) " " 00 "..... 8/ c:¡c:¡ c:¡c:¡ C:¡C:¡ OJ 3: Z'" OJ 3: 'Ö'Ö Q) Q) Q)'-' ""'" '" :;J :J: 'n '" :J:'Ö 'Ö " >. :E "''" " >, :E .... U '" " '" .co 0 :00 .... 'ÖIO," E-<", : 'M 'Ö", Q)N :0 , N, ...... " '"ri IDmm.JJ 't:! Q) , o , ¡"¡JJ.1J¡::tT.IU) ......0 O:E-<" "ri rorom:JQJO .. , ri .µa:lM OOO'ÖH .'" ri OJ U:;J .~....... .. ., "", '-'N~ ..... 10 . .>:'-' -.....O\O'\JJuO'\ '-'. .. "'. k c:¡. cO\O\o¡::'" "'0 ..:I 0 ..ZO O..-i.-lZH..-I . :;J " :J:a> ¡¡ '" "'ÖO"> >. 10 OION "''' , R5 ": .. ....., , , HIO "OJ'" ,"H~ U . -- ..:I-ri O-ri "'-'" ,-q~ <:tI Z +-tc A 113 _._~_._--- .- -- - ----- - - - --... ----- -- ~-~----- ------~- -- - _.~--- -- ---_.---~--_. N~51 Mr- ~~ ,",M No:> UU ~> MN Zz .-<.-< "" · ~~I " Mr- -'1 "'''' · ~¡;,:, 5 '"' .,.'" '"' '"'''' u '" .0: a. ........ '" <0:'" NN '" '" '" '" " 0 .... .... z , , r- 31 uu r- ~ 0000 u z Z 0 '" H ~ <0: · 0. " ;:¡: '" . . . . · 0 r< N~~ r-r- . ~ ....'"' " u z "'''' N~ "'.,. ~ r;¡ 0:> .-<'" 0:> "'M ~ '" :.: .-< N'" ~ 0 " .... 0-1 r;¡ ..-i '" - 0 N,", . 0 N,", ~ E-< '"' ~ '", ~ '", . J z_", r;¡ D", ,",M D", '"'0 !:::I 0 0'\ " >0. ........ -0'\ ~ a. NM t:: ;:¡:o.-< z ",<0:", ~I ( DH ¡¡¡ ~~ .å "'~ It1 , It1 , UJ[::JUJ U a.> ~ '" '" '" '" tJ '" '" 0 uu '" '" 00<0: L '" r;¡ .... ..:¡ .... ..:¡ n D~1t1 r< . J ~-~ z . J H -=: 0: .... U ..:¡ '0 '"'0 - 00 ~ ..:: M'" '" H ~DOJ ~DOJ · E-< <>: >'" "'M >'" 1t10 " Z r;¡ .0:0. .-<.... ";0. NM · '" '" '" '" " H r< <>: M ..:¡ ..:: , , ~ '" ~ <0: r- 0 UU r- 0 aJ<O: .... H ~ ..:¡ 0-1 OJ M E-< ~ <0: ~ aJaJ ~ aJaJ H OJ:;:: H OJ:;:: 0 0 " " -'" ,g H.w HOJ " ..... · H 0 OJ> '" E-< HC:'"' E-< OJ · E-<-O H3:~ E-<-o '" · z",..; "'0 z",<o: ...."'u .... .... OJE-< ~~M OJE-< tJ 0.-( z ;¡: ;:¡:H,", ;:¡:H\D -0: D;:¡: '" 0, D;:¡: " · OJ H. ....0 OJ H . .... "'..:¡ u :;::. "'..:¡ .w A.. · E-< - 0 E-< "'00 " E-< .~ ''"' E-< 00 .w", · OJD '" OJD"; :I:........ · OJ OJ .:>, . r;¡OJ .... . " ~"'1t1 """'r- ~'" .LJ..-(~ .... E-<-'" "'OON f-<- 0:1t1 · '" . '" . '" " :I: r;¡ .... '../ A/I~ . ..----.-- .-..-----. .-. --.--_."----"-- -- ------------ --- --~- ~_._--- . n__.__ ____.___ .__ ____~__ _ _ _ __~__.____ .__u__ - - -- - -- -------,... ..:¡ N.,. ..:¡ tJU N=:O ""N N~O Zz ~> 0.,. "'> ,",N - 0 '0 """ D_ O '"'''''' '"' .", u>'" .,.'" ..000 " ....<1:a. .... ....>a. , '" ,<1:", 0 ... '" 0 '" 0 1t1N ., U '" '"' '" '" '"' '" ~ '" .. 0 UO o, .. 0 '"'''' .... N ..:¡ .... N ..:¡ NN ., · .... .... " 0 u U¡!J 0".0 '"'1t1 0 0 ..; MDt:J M".t:J .. ..> '" ,",0 .." '" 0 N<1:a. ........ N>a. ., .... '" 7~tf) , · 0 0 " '"' '" '"' '" :'ò z .. 0 uo .. 0 0 rl ..:I .... ..:¡ · rl rl ., '" · H "tJ ~ 0 a. " ::;: tIJ . . . . 0 !-< ~..:¡ ",r- ~..:¡ N,", U Z N::cO 1t10 N::cO 0,", · OJ > 00 > rl'" '" ;0:' NN '"''"' 0 " ..:1_ OJ rl "OlD tIJ D- O NN D- O '"' rl zO", OJ '"' -'" '"' -'" +J t:J~0'\ " .. CJ t:.::1 Nrl -..000 1t10 ¡:: Z r-I~a. rl rl ~I r-I~a. N,", :E:t:Jr-I , '" , '" Q) "a. ::¡ ~~ ] OJ - IJ1 0 IJ1 0 "tJ "'><'" tJ o, '"' '" o, '"' '" · <1:> 0: o, u 0 00 o, u 0 C:¡<1: ., U '" OJ .... ..:I .... N ..:I " .............:.-- It! ,,01t1 !-< N " ~'''' Z rl rl 0 +J 0", u +J H ::cHrl ., ..: U::;: ,.: - - 0 ~- 0<; 0 -0 "'''' 0 '0 "'''' " '"'''''' '"'''''' '" H -- > '" .,.N u>'" "'N " 0: N<1:a. rlrl N<1:a. N,", u Z OJ H !-< rl '" rl '" " , , ~ 0 0 ~ 0<; '"' '" '"' '" u 0 UO u 0 C:¡<1: H rl ..:I rl ..:I ~ rl .... '" " ~ · <1: ., · " .. ~ C:¡C:¡ 0: C:¡C:¡ ~ ~ H "'3: H "'3: .... 0 0 .. _ro H.w HtIJ ¡:¡ 0 ..... 00> HC'" " 00 H 3~.. "-~ ro '" IJJ~O Z'" .-<'OU '" "''' U-.-rZ >: 00'0'"' ::;:H'" -::c roo,- ,,::;:'" . ,'- " '-<0 '" H_ ... u 3:. "'..:I .... c.. · - 0 " tlJOO .. , '" " .~ .w", · '" "'" :>:.-<.... · . >, - "'''' .-< - ., ""ror- ~"'1t1 .¡.J-.-r~ ... tlJC:¡N "-,,, "'::C1t1 :5 - '" - .. :>: '" ----.~ .... /IllS- ----.-----..------ - ~------ --------~---- - ._---~ ----- -- ----- - ---~--- ~----- ____n - ..:¡ N'" 0", 0", ..:¡ Nf::O 0", "'.-< 0'" N'"O UU -> '-<LI1 "'N C" 01 æ> ZZ N.-< NN NN . '0 01 .-< '" '0 ... ::;:,,'" ::;:,,'" "'>'" ... 0 .-< "'>'" '" ~'" .-< .-< .-< ~'" .-< '" UJ '" '" .-< 01 01 '" , \D '" UJ 'U ":0 0' '" UJ U' '" LI1 0 " '" '" LI1 0 N .-< ..:¡ .-< .-< .-< .-< ..:¡ 01 - .0 U", U", - ." "U .0 LI1>'!; · ::;:"", ::;:"", " " "'>'" .-< 0 '" "'>'" " 0 U1<~ .-< .-< U1<~ .-< 0 " , " 0 UJ ° 0 0 UJ 0 Z Z ... 0 ... 0 0 ..:¡ ..:¡ UJ " H Z ~ '" 15 CI) . . . . . . Eo< '"..:¡ ...'" ...'" MN '"..:¡ 01" U Z NæO "'''' 010 NN NæO NO '" > 0'" N'-< 01.-< > 0... UJ :<: N'-< NN NM LI1M · 0 " " ..:¡ '" · " ,.. CI) 0 ".... "'0 \D'" . ° NO ¡.. \D ~ Z-'" '" ::;: '", :E '", '" oJ "'0'" " "'''''' "'''' LI1.-< 0", a,¿O[:J "'.-< '" ¡:1 ::;:0.-< ~ ~'" .-<.-< .-<.-< .-<.-< :1 >", '-<01 .< QJ "H !i \D UJ "'>'!;UJ ] "''" LI1 , LI1 , ~ UJ"'UJ U "'> I>: '" '" UJ tI '" LI1 0 UU UO OU '" LI1 0 U~ '" '" .-< ..:¡ .-< ..:¡ ItS "::;:LI1 Eo< ,-- oJ ~"'''' Z oJ -'" H ..: .-< U ..:! - ,0 . '0 '" 0( "'''' "'0 LI1'" "'N · '" H ::;:,,'" ::;:,,'" " ¡.. '" "'>'" \D.-< 01'" 0LI1 "'>'" NM · Z '" ~'" .-<.-< .-< .-<.-< >'!;'" NM " H Eo< LI1 UJ LI1 UJ N I>: '" ~ 0( , , '" UJ UJ .< '" 0 UO UO OU '" 0 U>'!; H ..:¡ ..:¡ '" '" N ¡.. ~ '" oooo oooo oooo ~I oooo H "'3: "'3: "'3: "'3: 0 " 0 _m 0 - '" H H'-' H H'" " - - H~O .... · 0 0. H 0 ~C\D "'> ¡.. HC::N "'....'" ¡.. '" · ¡"-O H"M H"'" ....1-<.-< ¡..-~ m · ZUJ>'!; '" - '" - tJ.u~ ZUJ ....'OU .-< "'¡" "'....0 "'¡" .... "'....LI1 -~('I" ()-,..¡ Z " ::;:H\D "''ON ",'OM :EH'" -æ "::E '" ° "'0...... . '0...... ,,::;: ...... " '" H_ ....0...... ....0 .., c:: '" H_ . , .... UJ":¡ U3: U 3:. CI) H. UJ":¡ .., c.. · ¡.. - 0 - 0 0 ¡.. "'00 " ¡.. ,0 '''' , \D 1-<'0:0 ¡.. .~ '-'0:0 · "',,>'!; 0 '" m N "''' æ.....-< · "'''' . >. - . >. - Ii >. - "'''' .... - " "'UJ ..,"'''' ..,"'" Om... "'UJ ..,....... .... ¡..- "'OON "'OON ...."'01 ¡..- mæLI1 § UJ - m UJ - .. '" æ '" '" '.-./ ... ',/;II¡' .------------- -- ---- .-- ------------- -- ---- --- ----- ---------------------- .---_._- " 01 o:;:úJ 0!:...t:.J H 0.. ~\.::)U) c.. U) ~ÑoUlÑ70 · . . . :;: 0 ~~OO"l\DCX) ""'¡O\D...-tIJ')N 0..",..:1 \Dr"'-NOO"lM O~~~N...-t O~r--M...-tO"\ rl...-tNN...-tN N N N N N N' ~MNNMM Q;:E:D Oa.~ UUaJaJaJCJ .cD aJ tIlLXI aJ aJ ";aJaJU";<:: H 0.. g5lJ')U) 0.. , "'I :;: 0 ",.,...:1 0 · . MO C:>.,. ..", ~...-ttQ .,.'" ..; 0.. .......... 0'''' ,0 · . OM "'I O'\'<:t'NM r--\D~NI.DO"\ OLJ")~r-IlJ')O Hua UU :;:N..:1 OOr-l...-t O"IO'\M\D\DN t'...-taJUlNO'\ ..... NNNN r-Ir-INNNN M~NNMM t/ 0 ,.:¡ 0 · . MO .,.'" t-< ... "00 . II:! aJ CC CC CJaJaJ<::<::aJ ";<::aJCJ<::<:: ~N!=J "'.,. Z <::.....0.. .......... riI' 0,,,, :st/ '0 "Q OMClJI N rilO H --0 UU :;:.......:1 ..., t/ H ..... · . ¡:: DI ." ,.:¡riI " . OJ -::Poo ...." ~ · H >~ ø:riI " 0 '" tJ .'" riI:S O~", "'.... II! t-<H o '" · -- ..., Dlt-< H 0.. " ..., &5O"1U) · -::,.:¡ >~ -:: 0.. 'CIJ · . · . · r-Ir--OI.ONI.O MNONMO O"IMOOMO Poo":¡ ~c:>3 " ~-:: O'\Oo::t1NON NNOMt'o::t1 .-I Mt't'UlO 5 rlNNNNN NNNNNN "dI"dINNM~ -" ... \0 " 0 0 · . . '" o~'" £I)CCCCCJcccc a:u:Q CJ CJ..:( ¡:n ";";aJaJ<::< "" " '" H '" · . . M eo: '" ."" úJC:>CIJ ¡¡~~ 0.. , ClJI ""'''' ...."'''' ~<--3 0........ 0 ~M.. ~I " CCCJ£I) II:! CJCC CJCCt::Qcccccc c:oc:oroccc:¡cc 0 ZenzenzU) ZCIJZCIJZCIJ ~3:I1J3:P::J3: · · · " J.J · . CIJ-..:1 ,,- AO - J.J H J.J J.J ,U > 0 "to" H CIJ H J.J CIJ CIJ :>'0:> <::'0 · H H CIJ oeo:u eo: ""to H - '" ..:1 '" t:: ..... ..... · . " U '" :I: " ..... ..... >'J.J "'>' " . o 0, '" J.J ..... :> '" ..... '" -rl .LJ tIJ I-<J.J · . '" CIJ C. U m C. :;: :3:t::rtI_JJC 0 m '" ..... m :::HilH C::1 '" ..... :I: Z U Z '" 0 H"O ... .'" U CIJ - '" , ø: 'u uu ... f-o - C. , '" "on Z , , , . ¡; , oS '" - "" - "... 0 . '" . cI) eo: .... J.JH . oS H .." :;: cI) J.J > J.J .... .... .LJr--IHH . . " > J.J CIJ ..; aJ CIJ t: CtOCJ)uu . "to " úJ ..; CIJ '" 0 0'" -:>'" ...." "'....... CIJ '" J: '" aJ aJm:> u'" 00'" '" U " .... .,. " .....0 m "'0'" k ...... J.J ..... k '" J.J ..... mu..... ......... "'........ .... J: CIJ C. " , CIJ C. N-..... "'U J: J.J '" 0 eo: '" ..... .... "'- .",-- f-o '" :I: Z I>< CIJ :I: Z '" ~ '" ........ ~ II,? " 0 O¿!.:J O.a..!.:J ~ c.. [:::J~U) a. , "'I · . · . .... ... ... ... z 0 111 i:O\.DNN 0"1 MO\.OC'\ """ CDf'IXI.- o.",,,:¡ NO'\'<1'.- a\O'\ a)CO..;t\.O "'.... ['O'\~I.D Nr-INNr-Ir-! rlr-lNN "'''' .- ..--fNN Ö:':f:° 00.'" CQCJt:QCQCCaJ UU"'.o: "'OJ UtIH:a,c:¡; H '" ~LOt; Cl4 I wI z 0 o."''':¡ o' · . · . "'0 0'" "'" .ot:J ~r-It:J ....0 "'''' .0: a. "'''' riri CI I. U) ,0 ... ... .. ... CI M CI) 00:11 \DO CD "'''' "'.... ['\D CO CO H"O CJc:J~~r-:~ "'OJ Z"'..:¡ "'''' ....'" I..Dt'"-M...,. .... Nrl..--fN "'''' "'''' rlr-lNN tJJ 0 ,.:¡ 0 · . · . . ~gl "'.... ....'" E-< 'aJaJUCJ .",.0: "'''' uucc£n ~Nt:J .... ri "'0 Z .0:....0. "'''' ....'" rz¡. 0,,,, :¡:tJJ '0 øQ CI M UJI N rz¡O HooO "'''' "'''' Z......:¡ JJ tJJH .... P: · . ¡::: ,.:¡rz¡ 0..., Q) , . ..:Po ..." .å · Hrz¡ >'" " I ~ \-./ U P::¡: .~ g~¡;J "'.... ctI rz¡H · JJ ?;:E-< H a. >< JJ ~'" · > "'. ..: ..:,.:¡ '" · a. , ~I ......... or...... . . . . Po":¡ o:fr-l...-i....-iNf' Ul...-i""'ri "'''' r--COr-l"""¡ >< , ~..: ~"'..:¡ ['''''''¡I.DLf'J...-Ir-! ONI.Dt' "'.... COCT\'<1''<:t' Jj NNNNNN NNNN "'''' .-IrlNN ... \Þ Q 0 · . . '" O~'" «"'.0:.0:"'''' "''''.0:.0: "'''' u"''''''' ><..., ..., '" H '" · . . rl ~ a. ."" "''''''' §~"' a. ,,~~ , "'I ...~~ ~,,3 0........ 0 g~ IfI ~I ..., aJeQ ro aJ CO ca "'''''''''' "'''' aJálroCO " ZtI)ZU)Z(J) "'''''''''' 01'" t:JS:[:Q~ · 0 , H " <:: H oo 0 Q) ..¡ H C. .0 Q) ..... 0 Q) E ." > D oo ~ ~ · ..:¡ « c. oo >< H U '" 0 '" '" 0 " H > '"d '-' '-' ..... '"d '" " H '-' '-' U ..¡ ..... ..... U ..¡ · '" '" H .... <:: H ..... - ..... '" 0 oo H .r: 0 H ..... .r: 0 · oo :r: ..:¡ '" H E-< '" H :r: . E-< '" 0 '" +> H --< E-< ..... oo , , oo '" , >< Z U , , " " oo , " , " " . . 01 - '" c. '" :r: c. 0..., ..., ::E ..... E Q) ..... E Q) . . D >. U '" ~ U >, ~ ~ 0" " 01 '" - - '" riI ... "'... M '" .ã '" " ...... '" "~~ Z '"d '"d Z '"d --<~~ '" '-' '-' '-' +> ..¡ +> '" +> ..¡ "'........ 0 '" '" '" '" on ..... '" 0 '" '" ..... ..¡ , .r: ..¡ , .r: ""- '" u :r: ..:¡ riI H E-< '" '" :r: H E-< ....M ;t:1//cf -.----.. -.--.------.-- --.--- . --- -. - -_.-~ .---- ----- - -------------- ----. ~---- ----.- - ---- -.- - " 0 0-", 015:w ~ '" w\DtIJ '" , "'I ... ... ... ... . . . . · . :;: ° OC)~N f"'-OCj~ ",r- oo r"'-O'\ON ",,,,... r)r)r)~ NNor;7'N ON NN CO~tJ')C""I r)MNN NNNN NN NN ~NNN Ô:E:Q 0",'" CCCJt)U CJCCtCCC mm mm um.o:m H '" ~lt)~ Q." 1(.1)1 :;: 0 ",..,.... 0 · . MO M'" ··w ~rlW 0.... .0: '" NN 0'''' ,0 ......... ... Q r) 00/ O'ICOr)CO \,Olt)O'If"'- "'''' "'.... r-N HUO mm :;:N'" C"'-N\DM ~rlNr) 0..,. NM "'''' .... Mr)NN NNNN NN NN NN tJ 0 ,..:¡ 0 · - MO "'''' E-< .. uW .o:mmu cccccccc mm mm '.0:.0: ><Nr:J "'0 Z .0:....'" ....N ¡,¡. 0,,,, ::;:tJ '0 CJQ CI r) 001 N ¡,¡O H..a mm :;:....... .1J tJ H .... ~ · . . .: ,..:¡¡,¡ o.u .u " . . QJ .o:Ø< ...."r ~ · H >on ~¡,¡ §~~I ~. tJ o~'" rØ ¡,¡::;: tn.-l.-l·~_~ E-<H · .1J H '" " .1J ~E-< ~0'\Cf) 0 .o:,..:¡ ... ... ... ... . . . . >on ~ .0: Q." 1001 or;7'MU1CO MOrlO"¡ 00 N"" NOC"'-Lf') · Ø<"':¡ " ~"'S ~U1\"oN MMrlO ..,.M "'''' NLt')Lt')f"'- " ~.o: MMNN NNNN NN NN NNNN .2 N \J) " 0 0 o . . '" O~'" m<::mu ccrororo mm .0:.0: m<::.o:.o: ".u .u '" H '" · . . ,..¡ " '" ." " "''''''' ¡¡..... '" , "'I ""'''' ...."'''' ~r-S 0........ " ~M'O:I' .u" ~I au::c ¡:Q ¡:Q ro¡:Qroc:a mm mm ¡:QCCc:¡cQ 0 W~W3: ZCf)ZU) H z'" "':;:: W~t:J~ 0 0 H · H .u OJ - o 0 -W ~ .[1) OJ .00 0 t: H OJ [I) OJ > '0 """ '" H > '" ~ .0: " 0 [I) H .0: ..... """ " U '0 o 0 .u 0 ..... OJ [I) OJ - '0 " t: o 0. ..... rn [I) rn - " M :>. o . 0 -W_ '" -W t: H M H U " U_::IH ..... '" '" '0 -W H H '" .0. H"H U " > '" H , H 0'" :;:: - ... 0 .... ..... ..... .... E-< '" [I) , [I) m t: II> [I) [I) m OJ "on Z II>-WII> ..... II> C. [I) E-< .uN 0 . '" . "'t:'" " , .... '" '" E '" ..... o..u :;: .¡J I~[:J~ Q .. :;: ..... '" ..... .. O. UJ U U ..... U " U ...... 0"" " '" m- .- C. " , - - " OJ ...." "'.... UJ =: z ..... 0 .¡J m µ ~ 0" 0 .¡J II! . Z II> .... 0' .¡J '" U M µ µ " µ .¡J .¡J " "........ II! 0 M '" '" '" UJ UJ '" UJ '0 '0 .. '" :;:: ..... ¡:: , t: " - '" H '" =: '" ... H ... '" H ... H M · .... N A/I? ._u.______.__._ - .------ ~---- -~----_. - -- - -- --~.._-- --- - -- -. -~------~ - - -- ----.- -~- --.-- ---. -.-- N 0 . . O.,..W lOt' OËt~ ~ '" 010 ~I..:)U) NN '" (J) . . Or-. \ '0 NNCON NMO'\O"I 0'" ..,.N ~U)~ . U OJ N\DCO...-i \D.-Icx)\D ..,.0 <""1"" NN NNMM NNNN <""1<""1 ""<""1 ""<""1 ë¿o "'" 0",'" OJ";";"; ";OJ";"; cccc C;;"';"::: 4; ";OJ H '" ~1.'1~ NN 0, '(J)I :;: 0 UU o,..,.":¡ 0 <""10 ..", ~MItJ ..; 0, o It!) ,0 . . . . CMC/}! NMO...-i ..:;tIt'--N\D O'\CCC'lO~M t'0 Hua :;:N":¡ ONM...-i U)NOO"l OOM\DU)N ..,." ,.; NNMM NNMN Mr"1NN~~ ""<""1 rn 0 ..:¡ 0 <""10 1-< .. ..£:::1 OJOJ";"; ";OJ";"; OJOJUOJ";"; ..;..; ~Nt:::! Z ..;,.;0, iii- O'(J) ::;:rn '0 t!JQ CJ r"1 (1)1 N iii 0 Hue :;:,.;..:¡ JJ rnH ,.; .,: · ~ ..:¡1iI · Q) " .0:'" ..; ~ · H > 0 .,:1iI " 0 · \ III iii::;: 0:;:", m 1-<H ~":::£:::1 · ~- JJ " JJ .,:1-< ~O'\~ · .o:..:¡ '" '" ... ... . . > .0: c.. 1(1)1 r"1O'\...-iCD ...-i...-i~...-i MO'\MO"ICO\.D NIO · "'..:¡ " ~",,3 NN\.DO CO~COCX) rlO.-lMNO ..,...,. " ~.o: NNr"1r"1 NNNN MMNN-.;!<~ ""<""1 ] N '" " 0 0 · . . 0\ 0:;:'" OJ OJ";"; ";OJ";"; tnOJUU";"; ";OJ ".u .u 0\ H<t::J · . . ,...¡ ¡>: 0, .00 "'C:>(J) c~~ 0, E~~ , (J) ,~~ ~t'3 '6.-1.-1 0 ~""\þ 81 .u cccccccc cccccccc cceccccccccc OJ OJ " tiI~tiI~ "':3:"':3: ZCJ)ZCJ)t::J~ "':3: · · > " - .u > " ~ H · " rn ..; ... > .0 ~ 0. 0 ..; ... -'" rn "" E " (J) '0 0, rn ..:¡ · m '" 0. OJ ¡>: m U " '0 ¡>: <: 0 rn :I: OJ .-< > · ... n ... 0 <: -'" U U .u C <""1 OJ ... .-< ... '-' >. m - · -(J) 0 ,....¡-,....¡- rn u_.-< 0 , H -"'¡H Q)H m_ H'-'_ '" · . H U) H . :I:HZH tilH""'¡HmH '0 · ""'¡HOH 1><1 H H '0 OJ m ø: , -.< ¡... OJ "" ..... , , ø: , m E-r moo tI) rn " Z rnH rn . 'ID . '" '" "', '" >. 0. .u " . . '" .-<rn rn CD JJm~oo ID . m , m'O m CD E ..u.u :;: mm, m > U) ft1 CJ ft1 CD '0.-< .-<¡>:.-< .-< ¡>: . . C> . .....-< ..-< ..; .-< .-< -'" ¡>:u ,U U .-< .00 '" .u ~UQ)U ... U o.U n -.¡J-t:- n OJ ..; (J) '" ..u->- CD ro-O- ..0 m (J) >. > Z mNM "~~ rn ..; '" E '-' '-' U -.<~~ <: " <: 0 .-< >. ..-< :I: >. 10 "'........ ..-< '0 '0 n .-< .-< n <: .-< n 0 n <: ... ... m .... .u 0 OJ .., "" ~ :>: H <""1 0 0, :I: 0 OJ '" ¡... 0 H · N M - .4/20 ..~-- --,.....-.- ,,-,,~-_._""--_._--- - ~_._- ---- - -~------_._- .- .. -----~ ---~- ---- ------- - ----~- - - --- -.-.--- --- --- -~._----~-- . 0 · . °ZW M'" O"-tiI LO '" ;;: "- W\.:)U) .-<.-< c.. I U} '" ... .. '" "'a NO.....tt"'- ¿ 0 UU .. "-"'..:¡ NO c)1.!1\D~ NN NN~-<:' . 1 · . §¿tiI "'C- Hc..t=: ~";aJtO "''''0<:0<: <=","- .-<.-< tiI "- , "'I ¿ 0 UU "-"'..:¡ 0 MI ... ooC:tJ ><'"'tiI 0<: "- 0' ,0 · . . . OM "'I LnN\DO C)0'\t"'-\D H ·'0 . ¿N":¡ CO\DN...-I N\D\DUi '"' ...-I..-INN MN'O''O' tI1 0 ~ 0 MO Eo< ... oot:J UU"'''' 0<:"'0<:0<: ><NtiI Z <.-<"- r:¡. 0,,,, . ~ :<:tI1 '0 . C!1Q Q M UJ " N r:¡O H ..0 ¿.-<":¡ ~ tI1H ~ . J ~ .-< .~ ¡::; ~r:¡ ..... C1J ~ .::P< .... ] H ~~ ¡:>:r:¡ " · . tJ r:¡:<: o 0 .-<c- · cd O~'" '" .j Eo<H H tiI · . J '-<0 .. . J ~Eo< <= "- NN · .::~ [:JO'\UJ ......... .. > .:: "- ~ NO) \Dt"'-NO'\ · P<~ ~~..:¡ cctO~~ O\D-<:'Ln .. " :<:.:: MN-<:'''<;1t ..8 Eo< " · . N '" 0 0 c-.-< · . . '" O¿tiI .",,,, 0<:"'<0<: ",,~ 0\ H<C::I:J ON · . . M <= "- NN ." " tiI"'''' ".. '" "- e~ ~ , "'I "~~ ~c-s "'''' '6"" D ~ 'QI Ln ~1 " tOr:aCOCC CJ CO c:f ro c- " r::J~t:J~ C::I:J~[:J~ ,., · · , ~ .... 'Ö - · - 0 <= '" .Q H >. E-< "" H '" .... UJ Z · H :3 0 .... OJ '" .. 'Ö 't:I oW "" :.: · UJ '" C. 0: c: '" to ~ " UJ 0 0 U ..:¡ '" · '" .... oW c: 'Ö H >._ '" D .... '" .... 0 · U .... >. Q)HrOH ..:I · - , ..... ¡: ¿ oW .; ... ¡.. X .. UJO UJ H .. Z . UJ U , UJ UJ 0: ~ tiI .LI C. , "', '" '" " . . .~ ~ ¿ '" E .t: oW .... ..... E-< . . CO <= >. '" tJJU~U 0: ." " tiI I< '" .. Q)-,¡J- <. .... nS '" :3 I< .... c: "'Nn "~~ I: z 'Ö rn U U ..:I ...~~ 0 '" .. OJ ~ "'........ .... '" 0 .... .... 'Ö nS , .... .. '" OJ 0 "- ø. H '" E-< X ¿ E-< .N,., ,41Z,/ ------ -~.- ~ --.---------- _._--.---- -- --- .--- -----.~-_..--- ____.._______u__u _ _ ____uo__ _____ ____ ____ '" CI ..." oF- ... O¿~ M ~ ~ro ~ Oa.t:J H ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~"'WI --<.--< --<--< --<. ,WO ~ M NO M M~ ¿ -u -0 UU D ~~H ~ ~ M~ ~ N~ M M MM M NM N CI .... ... ... '" ... CI¿OO ~ 00 ~~ ~ 8a.00 U~ U~ MM ~~ ~U ro~ ~1.Of;; .--f r-I .-1M ""~ ~ CI CI UU CI "'.,.,.:¡ o ...... ...... "'.... <'1"1 N'<:fI O'HD r--~ ut:J ~Mt:J COU1 ...:'0'\ CX)\,D ~ P.c MM r-I r-ir-l ,,'W 10 ...... "<'1WI Mr-- ~~ .-1M H .. 0 U U U 0 U U . .' ~NH N~ ~~ NN M MM .-1..-1 NM tIJ 8 Z 0 '" III ...... ........ ~ MO C\~ MU1 M~ '" ...OJ a¡<:; uu a¡.o: tI) ~ ~Nr::=I a)!.!") MO CO\!) o ~ ~Ma. MM .-1.-1 MM ..,. ri1 0 I Ul 2 H~ ~ to ~ Q or"")U) C N 80 riI ~"O uu u" uu ~ Z H 0 ""''''''¡H a\ .¿J riI ~ ~ --< ~~ ~ ;¡¡::~ .~ riI " QJ CJ PI 1f)11 .-< Ei r:1 tJ I ~ IÞ ~ tr1µ:¡ ... III '" .... '" tJ ~ et:: H 0 CI Nee ["-oM v ., PI "" riI 0::;: OJ to> ''---, +J ~ ~ E-t H ,::¡:; ~ N co \.D I..D ~ " ¡;--. Z ~...... rn N r-i .-!.-I ¢) - H t:J "'. v~ ... ... ... ... :> ~ H a. Mr-- ee\D 1"'11""- o::f'M rc: ~.., lUll " O\~ H :E 0 C::¡U ..:''<:f' Uu ""'¡\.D ..:'O"\.-IM =' ........:e ~CDH .-1.-1 MM""'¡r-! NM 0 0\ H "" rl p: N tI1 'ò 0 Ñ~ 'OÑ v E-t O:Et:::J u() to'::;: ura aJ~ ~~~ P:: H¡::¡:;OO ['--'<; '< C'\I""- te:/'ISnI < e:::: a.,...¡,- MM moe \ÏI co U) ¡::..,. Ll'I a. Ea\a\ , U}I "~~ ::s 0 UU CQU '6"'¡.-I ~r--H 0 ~""1l'J " ~I moo CQOO roro roro ro~ OO~ c H ~~ ~~ ~~ zoo oo~ W~ ~ " , " . -~ ~ .Q C C C HItS It] "tI ~ ~ ~ H·~ _~ V It] ro ro J.J H~ H~ ¡.¡ M M M -00 J.J HJ.J B ~ ~ ~ H 0000 HOO C _0 _0 -0 ~ m~ ~ v HO HQ HQ oom m~ OO~ u H~ H~ H~ mE ~C ooC m H H H roO UH!lSH V I ~...-1 - ~ ...c t--t 00 00 00 U res I CJ I ¡.¡ Zoom 00 _~ _ il [i ro~ rc~ m~ JJ'd Q) ~~~ :E: ~;> ...-1 ;> M;> . I CJJ ;> rn 11I11I C) ()...-1 ()...-1 ()r-i 'd ~. ro tlQQ ~ -~ -00 -~ ;> ~~ J.JJJ ~ [J) ...-1 JJ rtI [J) C ~~ ~ .>, .:>, .>. roC/) E>' 0 -..40'10\ JJIO JJct1 JJct1 Oct1 C~ O'l..-t..-t 0000 C/)~ moo >.~ ,....¡ro ~~ It! It! It! "---" tiJ :I: t-:I ro a.::E i<NM /I/2-Z ~-~_.- -------- ------~_._.._._-_.--_.._-----_.__._--- -- ~--- ~ ----~-- -- ---- ----.--- -- --- --------_._-~--------'--- --~_.. --.. ou -- -~ ..--- -- --.- -- --- ------ , r < O¿:t;J 8c:...~ '" '" '-- .-< [:JI.::)(J) ~I~ . .,..-< '" .,.U1 0:- r-.-< g;U)~ U .-<0 1'0 "'''' "'.,. 00 1'0"" ..., 1'0.-< 1'01'0 1'01'0 " C . O¿:[:J U1 OCq;::J ee.o: ":.0: .o:ee .0:'" uu H 0. ~Ll'IU) .-< 0. , "'I ::E 0 C 0."'''' 0 ~.. '" . ~I 0'-< ~"",[:J 1'0'" .0: 0. 1'0'-< C' ,0 . . . . OMC!)I 0", U1N "'.,. "'''' H ',0 eeu ::EN'" .-< U1 ...,'" r-U1 .-<..., .-< 1'01'0 1'01'0 1'01'0 1'01'0 UJ 1-< Z 0 ~~ '" r,¡ ...,0 C).-< ::;;: .., ..t:J "'.0: u'" « uu UJ ~Nt:J .-<'" 0. t!J <.-<0. 1'0'-< r,¡ '" '''' . HUJ UJ '0 ., . 1-<¡:¡ £:) M (1)/ 0 N r,¡ H ,.0 ¡:¡U z8 ::E.-<.., ~ t!J .-< .'" . .J ¡'¡p;: ~ .'" ¡:: ::;;:¡,¡ ." IrI " CV t!Jp., 0 ... .å ¡,¡ tJ CX) ~~ UJ¡;¡ p;: I ~ I u p.,::;;: g::Eto:J · II! r,¡ H II) ~ ::;;:H 1-< "OJ · . .J ~ 0. k .u 1-<1-< Z · H OJ'" . . . . > .0: ",H 0. , "'I U1'" "'''' 0.,. 1'0'" .,.0 · ",H H ~"'S ON "'''' 1'0'" "'.,. 1'0'" k " "'~ ~ 1'01'0 1'01'0 1'0'-< 1'01'0 1'0'-< 1! H ,...¡ p;: N r,¡ Q C M · . . 1-< O~OJ eeee "'ee roe:¡ "e:¡ UU M k., ., p;: H OJ · . . ~ '" 0. .00 ú:J~tf. ".'" 0. .. S"'''' , "'I tIJ '",,,, ~r-S E-< '6...c.... Z U ¡,¡ :>: ~..,.II\ '" ., ~ OJ e:¡e:¡ me:¡ e:¡e:¡ e:¡e:¡ me:¡ tIJ " "'''' "'''' OJ'" "'''' "'''' · ¡,¡ · , re - - (! ., '" re H H - Z · -.... '" H H H '" .0 H C -OJ H H H :I; "" HQ H·... U · He:¡ H> OJ'" OJ '-< OJ '-< '" k OJ OJ OJ Q) riQ) ¡,¡ · OJ re OJ c· re Q) re'O u'O E-< ., " OJ N OJ Q) ri'-< riC -¡:: Z · reri re'O uu ure re H u rio. ri'O -Q) -Q) . Q) · u, u·... ri ri 'Ori .., · -C -:I; ·re Q)O "'0 '" .., ¡.. Q) 'Ox ;> H k Z ri , '" '" >" '" ., '" .(! , Q) ¡,¡ " . . ..,., ::E '0 "'c. ¡:: Q) Q) riQ) ¡.. . . ",re "'0 >,¡:: "'II) riOJ '" .00 '" '" '" uO C 0 re 0 '" ... ro·... :I:ri .... re '-< >.... II)N M "'" '" "'C ri ·u '-<ri ri .., ..,"'''' .... Q "'.... Q) re OQ) >,Q) '" OJ"" ce:¡ OJX riZ ::E ro::E ¡.. 0 re Q) '" 0 "- e:¡ '" ¡.. '" 0 ¡.. <NM )1 /z,3 -. ..- -. -. - - --_.- . ....---- - . --.-.-. .....----.-.. . --- ------.- - - . Attachment - 3 - 1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENTS OPERATING AT ~ MID LOS C (Data Reported at ~ 60% Level of Confidence) Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H St.') - Class III Lower Half of LOS C Avg. MPH Above LOS D LOS C Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe NB 11:30 - 12:00 15.4 2.4' 13 - 19 _ NB 12:00 - 12:30 15.4 2.4 (6 MPH) NB 12:30 - 1:00 15.7 2.7 NB 1:00 - 1:30 13.8' 0.8 SB 11:30 - 12:00 14.6' 1.6 SB 12:00 - 12:30 15.1 2.1 1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone. ~ 2 This speed is an average of 3 data runs with a Level of Confidence (LC) of 60'1;. 3 This speed is an average of 4 data runs with a LC of 40%. This analysis indicates that this segment operates near the middle of the range of average travel speeds for LOS C during most of the. mid-day period. For -one 30 minute period (1:00 - 1:30 PM) for northbound traffic, this segment operates at 13.8 MPH (0.8 MPH above LOS D) . However, it must be noted that this 13.8 MPH value represents an average of only 3 data runs and, therefore, should be considered only as an indication of the travel speed experienced during this time. -,.../ /1/zf ....--...."....._,..._,._---~.---_.- ______ - ____ ___ - _____.__ u_ ---- - .. ---- -- - --- .-- --- -- n _._ -- --- ---- -- Attachment 3 1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENTS OPERATING AT ~ MID LOS C (Data Reported at ~ 60% Level of Confidence) Otay Lakes Rd. (East H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) - Class II Lower Half of LOS C Avg. MPH Above LOS D LOS C Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe NB 4:30 - 5:00 20.3 2.3 18 - 24 NB 5:00 - 5:30 18.7 0.7 (6 MPH) Þ~alysis of the field data indicates that Otay Lakes Rd. operates near the lower limit of LOS C (0.7 MPH above LOS D) in the northbound direction for 30 minutes in the evening (from 5: 00 to 5:30 PM). This lower Level of Service C condition for northbound traffic is due to delay at the intersection of East H St. and Otay Lakes Rd. '- .- ,4/25 -_. -__"_.~_.__.___ u_ _ "_____ __ _ ___. _._~.. __ .______ __ __ ~_.__ ___ ____ .____ _ ____ _______ _______ Attachment 3 1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENTS OPERATING AT S. MID LOS C (Data Reported at ~ 60% Level of Confidence) Palomar St. (I-5 NB Rmps - Broadway) - Class III Lower Half of LOS C Avg. MPH Above LOS D LOS C Dir. Time Sneed Threshold Sneed Ranqe EB 4:30 - 5:00 13.5 0.5 13 - 19 EB 5:00 - 5:30 14.1 1.1 (6 MPH) WE 11:30 - 12:00 15.3 2.3 WE 12:00 - 12:30 13.8 0.8 WE 4:00 - 4:30 13.5 0.5 WE 4:30 - 5:00 13.9 0.9 WE 5:00 - 5:30 15.1 2.1 WB 5:30 - 6:00 14.0 1.0 Þ~alysis of the collected data indicates that Palomar St. operates near the middle of the range of average travel speeds for LOS C except for one 30 minute period (from 4:30 PM to 5:00 PM) where this segment operates at 13.5 MPH (0.5 MPH above LOS D) in the eastbound direction of traffic. Westbound, this street operates near the lower limit of LOS C (within 1.0 MPH of LOS D) for 30 minutes at mid-day (from 12:00 to 12:30 PM) and for one and a half hours in ~he evening (from 4:00 to 5:00 PM and from 5:30 to 6:00 PM) . Westbound traffic experiences delay primarily at the 1-5 northbound ramps and occasionally at the intersections of Murrell Dr./Palomar St. and Industrial Blvd./Palomar St.; for eastbound traffic, delay occurs at the intersection of Broadway and Palomar Street. '.;"/ ,/;¡/Z¡' .. ._-_.,---"'----'..,....._._~-"'-- ----- ----------._-- --~._--~----- -.-- . ---------- --- -- ----.. ~ ~.._-- Attachment 4 1996 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS OPERATING AT $ MID LOS D (Data Reported at ~ 60% Level of Confidence) H St. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave) - Class III Lower Half of LOS D Avg. MPH Above LOS E LOS D Dir. Time SDeed Threshold SDeed Ranqe WE 11:30 - 12:00 10.5' 1.5 9 - 13 WE 12:00 - 12:30 10.6 1.6 (4 MPH) WB 12:30 - 1:00 9.9' 0.9 WB 1:00 - 1:30 9.3 0.3 WB 4:00 - 4:30 10.3 1.3 * Data reported with a 40% Level of Confidence LOS E -- Avg. MPH Below LOS D LOS E Dir. Time SDeed Threshold SDeed Ranqe WB 5:00 - 5:30 8.8 0.2 7 - 9 (2 MPH) Analysis of the field data indicates that westbound H St. at 1-5, is functioning at the lower limit of LOS D (within 1 MPH of LOS E) from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM and at LOS E (0.2 MPH below LOS D) from 5:00. PM to 5:30 PM. This LOS E condition (8.8 MPH) is not considered significant, however, because the average travel time across this short (883' ) segment at this level of service is only 68.1 seconds. :..-. ,4/2- '1 - ~~- --- --- --. --- ...- --- - -- --- -- - -. Attachment 4 1996 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS OPERATING AT ~ MID LOS D (Data Reported at ~ 60% Level of Confidence) Palomar St. (Bay Blvd. - Industrial Blvd.) - Class III Lower Half of LOS D Avg. MPH Above LOS E LOS D Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe EB 4:00 - 4:30 9.4 0.4 9 - 13 EB 4:30 - 5:00 10.2 1.2 (4 MPH) Eastbound Palomar St. at I-5, is functioning at 9.4 MPH from 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM and at 10.2 MPH from 4:30 PM to 5:00 PM. This represents a change from 1995 when the average travel speeds during these periods where 11.6MPH (4:00 - 4:30 PM) and 9.4 MPH (4 :30 - 5:00 PM) respectively. Delay for eastbound traffic along this segment occurs primarily at the I-5 southbound ramps with some 'additional delay also occurring at Industrial Blvd. . There is \. currently a CIP project pla=ed which will provide topographic mapping and traffic data to Caltrans for the preparation of a project study report for the I-5/Palomar St. interchange. This project study report will identify the ultimate improvements for the interchange. ~ (H:\HOHB\SNGINSBR\TRAFFIC\H-96TMP.SH) FJ/z$ .'nm__"__.."_·"'_'.. .------- -- _-,..... I ¡ - ." - ~-- - --~ -- -. - --. . -. _ 0 __._n _.__. _on J j(", I I.. - ........,.;...-~ I. ~ -ï:"'/ ~ 0 - 1-, ,r t~"_"_:. Vì2L{....) , _. CITY OF CHULA VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 1996 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM FINAL REPORT . - ~ - November 15, 1996 - /I/z1 --. ---~. ..-- - -- . ---. - - TABLE. OF CONTENTS i Paqe Project Background 1 Project Methodology 2 1996 TMP Study Results and Analysis 4 Arterial Interchange Segments 22 Conclusions and Recommendations 32 Appendices - 1 Chula Vista Growth Management plan 1-1 Revised Traffic Element (May 1991) 2 Arterial Level of Service 2-1 3 Arterial Segment Classifications 3-1 ( 4 'Summary of Previous TMP study Results 4-1 , 5 1996 TMP Arterial Segment LOS 5-1 (All Time Periods) 6 1996 TMP Arterial Segments 6~1 Operating at ~ Mid LOS C 7 1996 TMP Arterial Interchange Segments 7-1 Operating at ~ Mid LOS D .. -- A/3ð ... ··.._____"^·m_.·~··_·._·___ - -- -- ~ ~ .-- .-- .---- - __n__ __ ~.- - _.-- ~ -_.-- -.- ----- --~~ .--- - LIST OF TABLES. Table Paqe 1 1996 TMP Arterial Performance 4 (All Time Periods) 2 1996 TMP Arterial Segment LOS 6 (All Time Periods) . 3 Arterial Segment LOS Comparison 12 1995 VS. 1996 4 1996 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment 24 LOS (All Time Periods) 5 1996 TMP'Arterial Interchange 27 Segment Performance 6 1996 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment 28 - LOS Comparison 1995 VS. 1996 (All Time Periods) 2-1 Arterial Segment Classification Factors 2-1 4-1 Arterial Segment Level of Service 4-2 (Previous TMP Study Results) -- 4-2 Arterial Performance . 4-9 (Previous TMP Study Results) 4-3 Arterial Interchange Segment Performance 4-10 (Previous TMP Study Results) LIST OF FIGURES Appendix 1 - Growth Management Plan Revised Traffic Element 1992 Arterial Network & Segment Classification Map ~ /1/31 , 1996 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM - . FINAL REPORT .--- PROJECT BACKGROUND In 1988, the City of Chula Vista adopted a Growth Management Plan to assist the City in assessing the environmental, fiscal and operational impacts of proposed land development. In 1991, the Traffic Element of this plan was revised to conform to the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for determining arterial Level of Service (LOS). based on average travel speed. This Traffic Element, which specifies threshold standards for acceptable Levels of Service for arterial streets in the City, forms the basis for the Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) which the City performs annually. This revised Traffic Element, along with the approved Arterial Network and Segment Classification Map, is presented in Appendix 1. Since 1992, the City has conducted travel time studies to assess the operating LOS of arterial streets in the Ci ty . During the -- first three years of the program, baseline data was collected for each arterial segment during the three time periods studied (AM, Mid-day and PM) . Each year those segments found to be operating at LOS C or less in the previous year's TMP were also restudied. This Final Report will describe the methodology and procedures involved in conducting the 1996 TMP and will analyze and present the results obtained from this study. Additional information has also been included at the end of this report to provide the following: The revised Traffic Element, along with the approved Arterial Network and Segment Classification Map (Appendix 1). A description of Arterial Level of Service and Arterial Se~ent Classification Factors (Appendix 2).. A description of Arterial Segment Classifications for the City's existing arterial network (Appendix 3). A summary: of results from studies performed in previous years (Appendix 4). A listing of Arterial Segment LOS (for all time periods) which includes the most current information available for each segment (Appendix 5). A listing of Arterial Segments (from the 1996 TMP) which were found to be operating at ~ Mid LOSC (Appendix 6). 1 - A 13;;1. -.-..-.- .- .... .". "-"-"--'--~--'--_.'- - - ..--- ..-- ._-~ -- .-.. .... - A listing of Arterial Interchange Segments-(from~the 1996~TMP) whJ.ch were found to be operating at i. Mid LOS D (Appendix 7). PROJECT METHODOLOGY The arterial network established for the 1992 TMP (Appendix 1 , Figure 1) was the basis for the field studies conducted during the 1996 TMP. However, as stated in the 1995 TMP report, the classification of the segment on Otay Lakes Rd. from East H st. to Telegraph Canyon Rd. was changed from Class I (as shown in Appendix 1 , Fig. 1 ) to Class II to more accurately reflect the characteristics of the existing roadway. Since travel time studies are very labor intensive, this year's TMP was limited (city-wide) to an evaluation of the following segments: arterial segments which were found by the 1995 TMP to be operating at LOS C or less, - arterial interchange segments which were found by the 1995 TMP to be operating at LOS D or less, segments where traffic volumes have increased 10% or more (at any count station along the segment) since the segment was last studied for a previous TMP report, segments where major street widening has occurred andlor where new traffic signals have been built which significantly affect the operational characteristics of the roadway, H st. lEast H st., from 1-5 to Rutgers Ave., was also studied to provide the most current information possible for this traffic corridor. Data collection for the TMP used a special vehicle equipped with a computer which recorded the distance traveled for each second of time spent driving a segment. Subsequent analysis of the field , data generated information (on a directional basis) for travel time, average speed, cruise speed, number of stops, and delay time along the length of the segment. Each arterial segment evaluated during this year's program was driven for the entire two hour time period under study. A sufficient number of runs were done for each direction of each segment to provide a statistically adequate sample with a minimum acceptable level of confidence of 80% for the two hour study period. For segments found ·to be operating in the lower half of the LOS C range of average travel speeds, additional data was collected to evaluate those segments on an hourly basis during the 2 -~ 19/33 ___.______u. _.__._~_~________._ ______ ~__ _ __ ______ .--- _._-~- - --- two-hour study period where -that lower LOS C condition was found to exist. Segments evaluated hourly that were found to operate in the lower half of the LOS C range of average travel speeds were analyzed in half hour intervals, however, additional field data was not collected. Arterial LOS values shown in the 1996 TMP were evaluated according to the following HCM Level of Service values (from Appendix 1): LOS Averaqe Travel Speed (MPH) Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 A 2.35 2.30 2.25 B 2.28 2.24 2.19 C 2.22 2.18 2. 13 D 2.17 2.14 2. 9 E 2.13 2.10 2. 7 F <13 < 10 < 7 - Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985. \ - 3 -- ~ /:1/f LJ-" - - - - -.... - -.- -- ----.--.- . -"'- .-.. __ 0·----00 __ - _ 1996 TMP STUDY. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS This section of the report analyzes and presents the results of the field studies for the arterial segments studied during the 1996 TMP. The results for the arterial interchange segments studied are found in the section titled ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS which follows this section of the report. Arterial LOS is directional in nature and is based on both the classification and the average travel speed of the arterial segment under consideration. Table 1 summarizes the results of the 1996 TMP showing the number of arterial segments, listed by classification, which conform to each Level of Service during each of the three time periods studied (AM, Mid-day and PM). Table 1 1996 TMP ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE ALL TIME PERIODS - AM PERIOD 7AM-9AM CLASS LOS I II III TOTAL - A 2 - - 2 A/B* 2 1 - 3 B - - 4 4 B/C* - 1 1 2 C - 1 - 1 C/D* - - - - D-F - - - - * Indicates segments operating at different LOS's in different directions. 4 .~ ,&:1135 -'..-"'-'-- . ._--~._.,.._- ~--'---~~- -- ,. - Table 1._ (Cont. ) --.- ~.. --- --- ~ - -.-. .- - - -. -... ---- -- - 1996 TMP ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE ALL TIME PERIODS MID-DAY PERIOD 11:30 AM - 1:30 PM CLASS LOS I II III TOTAL A 2 - - 2 A/B* 1 - - 1 B - - 2 2 B/C* - 2 - 2 c - - 3 3 C/D* - - - - D-F - - - - -- PM PERIOD 4 PM - 6 PM CLASS LOS I II III TOTAL < " A 1 - - 1 A/B* 1 - 2 3 B 1 1 2 4 B/C* - 3 2 5 C - - 3 3 C/D* - - - - D-F - - - - * Indicates segments operating at different LOS's in different directions. The following table presents the results of. the 1996 TMP Study in terms of arterial LOS, average speed and travel time for each arterial segment studied during this year's program. To compare LOS values for each of the three time periods studied by the TMP please refer to Appendix 4 at the end of this report. This appendix combines information from previous TMP studies to provide LOS values and average travel speeds for each arterial and arterial interchange segment studied. during the AM, Mid~day and PM peak periods. Appendix 5 provides the same information as Appendix 4 . . updated to include the data obtained for the 1996 TMP. .. -. 5 /f 1:1(, ....___.__,.._.__... .._m _ . _..___..,___~....___._ . ._.~-_. -----_.~ --_.~---_.- ..--- -- ~- ~- - - -.. -- -- ~----- _.-,- -- - - - ~- -. - ----~_. - - . Table 2.-- -. - - - - · n_ ____ ---- -. 1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS ALL TIME PERIODS AM PERIOD" TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 7-8AM 8-9AM TIME fiR . ADT (YR) DIR. LOS SPEED LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) VOL Fourth Ave. (Class III) SR-54 EB RmJ¡'s - H st_ NB B 22.3 4:01.6 1443 , 30,380 ( 96) SB B 22.2 4:02.8 1393 H st. IE_ H st_ (Class III) I-5 NB Rmps- Third Ave. EB C 18.7 3:36.8 1363 30,460 ('96) WB B 19.8 3:24_0 1237 Third Ave.- I805 SB Rmps EB B 24.1 3:09.7 26805 40,610 ('95) WB B 24.1 3:09.8 26945 -- East H st. · I805 NB - SW CoIl. Ent. EB B 34.4 5:40.9 29414 54,180 ('94) (Class I) WB A 35.3 5:32.2 43464 SW Col. Ent- Rutgers Ave. EB B 26.5 1 :57.1 1291 23,880 ('96) (CIs II) WB C 22.8 2:16.0 2057 Hilltop Dr. (Class III) L st. - Orange Ave. NB B 21.1 4:54.5 6565 10,920 ('95) SB B 20.9 4:57.6 5005 Industrial Blvd. (Class III) L st. -Main st. NB B 24.0 3:41.3 ~:306 6,380 ('96) SB B 23.0 3:50.7 411 Otay Lakes Rd_ E. H st. - Tel Cyn Rd. NB C 21.3 1:48.8 1142 17,730 ('96) (CIs II) SB C 23.9 1 :37.0 1264 Tel Cyn Rd-Eastlake Pkwy EB A 42.8 2: 15.2 17175 23,690 ('95) (CIs I) WB A 40.6 2:22.5 24235 · 4 1994 Data 5 1995 Data * Single entries centered between two columns are 2 hour average values. 6 · /I/.1? - Table 2 (Cent.) - - -~. -,~_.. --- . --.... -. .~.. ." - - - ----- -- _. -- - -- - --- , -- -.-- - -- -- . - -- ---.--.. -_.~ - --...- - -- . --_ __ - - _n" _ --- - .. ---- - .... 1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGM-~T LOS ALL TIME PERIODS AM PERIOD" TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 7-8AM 8-9AM TIME HR ADT (YR) JlliL LOS SPEED LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) YQ!, Otay Valley Rd. (Class I) I805 NB Rmps- E. CVCL EB A 44.2 2:27.9 14955 18,600 ('95) WB - B 34.5 3:09.6 8865 Telegraph Canyen Rd. Halecrest-Med Cntr Dr. EB A 30.6 2:00.6 32175 45,120 ('95) (CIs II) WB B 26.7 2: 18.4 38965 Med Cntr-Otay Lakes Rd. EB A 44.2 3:19.7 26324 31,460 ('94) (Class I) WB A 45.9 3: 12.4 27634 - TOTAL ARTZRIAL SEGMENTS: 12 4 1994 Data 5 1995 Data * Single entries centered between two columns are 2 hour average values. 7 . -- ¡t} /3" "n"'._"_.__"____.. -. - - . - .,- .---.-- -- - .------ ..._,-- -- --- - .------ --- -.--'- .- Table 2_ (ConL~___ _d . __. __ ..__. __ u_.__._,." ...d. . - - - -+-- . +---. . _u 1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS ALL TIME PERIODS MID-DAY PERIOD· TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 11:30-12:30 12:30- 1 :30 TIME HR ADT (YR) DIR. LOS SPEED LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) VOL Third Ave. (Class III) , 4th/c st. - H st.1 NB C 15.4 C 14.8 5:30.5 1308 16,370 ('96) SB C 14.9 C 16.4 5:20.8 1365 Fourth Ave_ (Class III) SR-54 EB Rmps - H st. NB B 19.7 4:34.4 2369 30,380 ('96) SB B 19.6 4:35.9 1921 Broadway (Class III) -- L st. - S. CVCL NB No data due to road 14805 · 19,090 ('95) SB construction. 15205 H st. IE. H St. (Class III) I-5 NB Rmps- Third Ave. EB C 16.7 4:02.3 3012 30,460 ('96) WE C 17.6 3:49.3 2424 Third Ave.- I805 SB Rmps EB B 23.8 3.12.7 30555 40,610 ('95) WB B 24.8 3:04.3 25305 East H st. · I805 NB - SW ColI. Ent. A 37.9 5:08.9 31024 EB 54,180 ('94) (CIs I) WB B 32.8 5:57.9 :><;334 SW Col. Ent- Rutgers Ave. EB B 26.3 1:58.0 1266 23,880 ('96) (CIs II) WB C 23.8 2:10.7 1431 Otay Lakes Rd. E. H st. - Tel Cyn Rd. NB C 23.9 1 :36.7 1206 17,730 ('96) (CIs II) SB B 26.0 1 :29.1 1169 Tel Cyn Rd-Eastlake Pkwy EB No data due to road 11695 · 23,690 ('95) (CIs I) WB construction. 12065 1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone. 4 1994 Data 5 1995 Data * Single entries centered between two columns are 2·hour average values. . -. - - - - 8 · /1139 _____. ________________ _ __._.._____.Iab]!!_2..lConLJ____ . ._______ --.. -.-:-::-. .--.---------- .----. - - -- ------ ---- ... _m __ __ _ ____ 1996 TMP ~£TER1AL SEGM7-NT LOS ALL T1Y~ PERIODS :(- MID-DAY PERIOD" TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 11:30-12:30 12:30- 1:30 TIME HR ADT (YRJ DIR_ LOS SPEED LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) VOL Otay Valley Rd. (Class I) 1805 NB Rmps- E. CVCL EB A ,44.7 2:26.1 14635 18,600 ('95) WE A 37.0 2:56.5 14285 Palomar st. (Class III) 1-5 NB Rmps - Broadway EB C 18.5 1:55.8 2044 31,180 ('96) WB C 16.2 2: 11.8 2240 Telegraph Canyon Rd_ - Med Cntr.- Otay Lakes Rd. EB A 46.7 3:09.0 15154 31,460 ('94) (CIs I) WB A 45.6 3: 13.4 18934 TOTAL ARTERIAL SEGMENTS: 12 4 1994 Data 5 1995 Data * Single entries centered between two columns are 2 hour average values. ---- 9 ,41/1¿? --"...-,-,----- ---_.._-_._.._..._-"....._--"._~_. ~ --- - --- -- - - ------------- .__.-=-_~ ---:.-c--'c _ --.-- :--------___Tab)e__2__(Çpl!t_..L_____-.,-__-=---:c---.---::-:---_--:- ._,___,:--_ 1 996 TlfJ' ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS . ALL TIME PERIODS PM PERIOD· TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 4 - 5 PM 5 - 6 PM TIME HR ADT (YR) DIR. LOS~ LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) Yill! Third Ave. (Class III) 4th/C St. - H st.1 NB C 16.5 5:03.4 1274 16,370 ('96) SB C 17.2 4:50.1 1380 , Bonita Rd. Willow St_ - East CVCL EB B 27.6 1:42.4 42164 37,420 ('94) (Class II) WE C 23.1 2:02.0 20484 E St. (Class III) -- I-5 NB Rmps- Third Ave. E3 C 18.3 3:40.5 2102 25,320 ('96) WB C 18.0 3:45.0 1546 H St_/E. H St. (Class III) I-5 NB Rmps- Third Ave. EB C 17.8 3:47.3 2480 30,460 ('96) WE B 19.7 3:25.0 2216 Third Ave.- I805 SB Rmps EB B 24.8 3:04.4 37505 40,610.( '95) WE A 26.1 2:55_4 28185 East H st_ I805 NB - SW ColI. Ent. EB B 33.0 5:54.8 50234 54,180 ('94) (CIs I) WB B 33.8 5:47.0 ~074 SW Col. Ent- Rutgers Ave. EB C 23.1 2:14.6 2060 23,880 ('96) (CIs II) WE C 21.2 2:26.6 1720 Hilltop Dr. (Class III) L st. ~ Orange Ave. NB B 24.8 4:10.0 8185 10,920 ('95) SB B 22.4 4:37.4 972S Industrial Blvd. (Class III) L st. - Main st. NB B 20.6 3:54.3 537 6,380 ('96) SB B 22.7 4: 18.3 479 1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone. 4 1994 Data 5 1995 Data * Single entries centered between two columns are 2 hour average values. 10 - A/~/ - ____ __ _un ._______.Table_2:~Cont.) .----- --"- ..~ - .-.--.---- ... -- . __ - _._ _0.·_--- . - .---.-...-. - ".- 1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS ALL TIME PERIODS \. PM PERIOD" TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 4 - 5 PM 5 - 6 PM TIME HR. ADT (YR) DIR. LOS SPEED LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) VOL L st. (Class III) Industrial Bl.- 3rd Ave. EB C 18.7 3:37.0 1344 16,280 ('96) WB B 21.9 3:05.6 1271 Orange Ave_/E_ Orange Ave_ Palomar st.- Hilltop Dr. EB A 26.2 3:33.8 11535 14,570 ('95) (Class· III) WE B 21.3. 4:23.0 12325 Otay Lakes Rd. - E. H St. - Tel Cyn Rd. NB C 20.7 C 20.5 1 :52.2 1272 17 ,730 (' 96) (Cls II) SB C 23.9 B 25.7 1 :33.5 1472 Tel Cyn Rd~Eastlake Pkwy EB No data due to road 23195 23,690 ('95) (Cls I) WB construction. 15825 Otay Valley·Rd. (Class I) I-80S NB Rmps - E. CVCL EB A 42.0 2:35.5 11115 18,600 ('95) WE B 32.7 3: 19.7 15935 Palomar St_ (Class III) I-5 NB Rmps - Broadway EB C 15.5 C 15.3 2:19.7 2500 31,180 ('96) WE C 13.7 C 14.5 2:32.3 }396 Telegraph Canyon Rd. Halecrest - Med entr. Dr. EB B 28.2 2: 11.1 36915 45,120 ('95) (Cls II) WE B 25.0 2:27.7 30375 Med entr.- Otay Lakes Rd. EB A 46.1 3:11.8 28874 31,460 ('94) (Cls I) WE A 44.7 3:17 .8 19204 TOTAL ARTERIAL SEGMENTS: 17 4 1994 Data 5 1995 Data * Single entries centered between two columns are 2 hour average values. '- 11 ,¿; / 'I .,;J.. """-..-.."..-...----.----....-- ( ) .c - -:-- - -.------------- --~:.~---- .----- ----------- --- --~---- ----- O· ~I ~~ ~~ UU UU ~~ ~o - !o V~ ~~ ZZ ZZ ~~ ~o . N_> ~M MN NO ~~ ro~ ~~ __ _N , .¡J( ) ro~ '0] _.0 ~.¡J .:E: l-' [.i ~UJ <>f=1 ~ ....Po, _+J O'\......U) C MN ~~ __ ~M. ~ro _0'\ ~~ I ~ ~~ ~~ ~V ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ro 0 NN __ NN MM NN NN k ( ) 0\ ~ roUJ 0\ ~.c ~ _ 0 ¡:¡¡¡:¡¡ U¡:¡¡ ¡:¡¡'" ¡:Q< ¡:¡¡U ¡:Q¡:¡¡ 00 :E: . f=1 0113 <l-'f=1 ( ) > Po, '~ CO<~ 'O~ I O<¡..¡ ~ ~ Z ~ 0 ~ ( )'O 0 ~ ~ ~( ) ~ ~ t:: H ;j ( )~ ~ 0 ~ro < u -- .. .¡J Po, ~ ~ ..w..Q:E: r'"1M ~~ "'I:I'~ '0::1''0::1' MM 0 o 0 ~ 0'\0 ~~ O~ _~ ~~ ~_ Z ~ U w ~O ~~ ~~ 000'\ ~~ O~ ~_ oC -0'\ N~> roM _0'\ ~W 0'\1""") 0_ MO'\ ~O WOrn -_ ,- NN N~ NN _ U ( )~ ~ Oo~ Z .¡J ~H ..113 ( ) ~. , Me...-i E-<[.i ~ -.0 ~ 2k ~ ZPo,> :E:l-'f=1 V~ V~ ~~ O\V o 113 f=1 <>f=1 '" . " " <¡..¡ E-< :E::E:~ <Po, ~o ~V ~CO ~~ ~ C e,,<0\ 0'\ [JJ MM _N NN MM NN MM E-<~ f=1-O\ ~~ ~~ mm CJ),- I . . .. ".. .J \D t/) Ln_ "'=1'N røctS ~~ ~ ~ CO 0 NN U¡:¡¡ <¡:Q « UU NN CC 0\0\ < 0\ ~ V 11"1 _- H 0'\ ~~ ~ ,- ~m (I) (I) f=1 _ 0 < ¡:¡¡ ¡:¡¡ ¡:¡¡ ~_ ..d 8 :E:-t::J L!')C"") l'''d' 00\ _,- .c.¡J. ~ <l-'f=1 ........ ....11"1 .¡J < > Po, 0\0 ~~ ~~ N~ _ <¡..¡~ co<~ ~N NN ~~ NN O~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ¡:Q¡:Q«« UU -~ ~ ...-i'O k :I ( ) ::J UJ.¡J 0 (1)0 ~I ¡:Q¡:¡¡ ¡:¡¡¡:Q ¡:Q¡:Q ¡:Q¡:Q ¡:¡¡¡:¡¡ ¡:Q¡:Q ~ k(l) H Z~ f=1~ f=1~ f=1~ f=1~ Z~ k ...-i 0 Q) ~~ - ~ J:: 0 . _ _ _ ..wo ~ -..w 00 ~ ~ ~ ¡:¡¡ t:: k >11"1.... UJro E-< 0 ~o ~ f=1 ( )o <0 ~ .¡J.¡J E-<~O ~co 'O~ ~CO N ~ t::ro Z~< ~ kv ~ U .¡JCO (1)0\ ~ (1)'0 f=1E-< I ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ :I, ~,~ UJ :E:H~ ~o .co CO ~U ~~ ~o ( ).¡J l-':E:O\ 'e~ E-<~ IU Z N 'ro~ cvm kt:: f=1H- (I)~ HZ'I 'I I-Ik k~ ~ (I) ~ ~ >....... I....... .¡J ....... .¡J ....... Q 0....... m ~ o E-< < ¡:¡¡ I....... tf. ¡:¡¡ tf. .¡J II> ~ (I) E-< . Q f=1M ¡:¡¡.... Z.... t::.... ~ 1 M ~ M k f=1l-'< ~ 0 ZO '00 = 0 =f=10 0 0 ~~ OJ ww ..woqt,-. \0 .H_ I.t)t:::) 0'\ ..w+JO'\ t::0\. ...-i.¡J ~~~ 1-I1l"1~ .¡J~~ .¡J~~ .¡JO~ .¡JUN ...-i~co ~~ _ ~UJ E-<-O\ ;:5~, ~1,~.c UJCO, UJ~'...-i, . 113 0 ~ - O~~ H~ E-<o roHV ro~o ...¡~~ 8E ~-M =-N =-~ ~-L!') ~-M =__ ~M /i/~j " - 0 -------- -- -~_._------------------------ ~~----_..~-_._'----_.- -..~_.- ~-~ --..---- .:~ -- -- LnLn LnLr) "I;;I"":!" U ~I ~~ N~ ~M OU ~~ NM ~ ~O O~ ~~ ~N ZZ ~~ M~ ~ NX> M~ _N ~~ NeD W~.~ ~- _N MM NN C o U ~ 0 'Ö . ~ ~ø~ ° ~>~ ~ ~~~ B 00 M~ ~~ N~ ~~ N~ I . . . .. . . IV tI) "QIC"') '_M NO ocr ocr O\D oo:::'tn .§ ~ ro 0 NN NN ocr~ ~M MN ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ 0 P:¡¡Q UU ~~ '::P< ":P< ..:.:: ~ ~ .~ .::ø~ Zo >ø. ~ ~..:OO ::: .. I ~ 00 ~ Z ~ 0 'Ö~ o ~ Q)U 00 ~~ H ~~~ ~ ~~~ .:: c O'~ -- U 4 '" It) Q) :E "I;; "~ "I;; ""I;; " 1""")(""") MM NN Ct\.LJ..u ~ 0 ~I NO L(')~ <0::::'\0 Lf)\.:;) _0 L(')C) O'\O~ U ~ ~O ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~N ~~ ~Z< ~ -~ N=> MM _~ ~M ~ro ON M~ c: [f. OO'\ t""""_ _ ,- Nt"l N.,- US:: o 00... It)ZO U ~H .~ - c:::. ..u 8 ~ 00 -. Q ~ M M Z,,",> ~ø~ M~ .;¡ ... ~ ~ r=¡ . . ..... '" C1J ~~~ ~""' ",~"oj: .~ -- M e,,<rn 0'\ tI) MM NN MM MM MM ~ ..Q [::1-0'\ o..qo 1l')('I"") 000'\ _r- ttlRSm ItS tf.J - I . . . . . .. .¡.J.¡.J....... 8; (IJ ocr~ "Q'\D MCD \DID tOttlO ~ L(') CD 0 NN O~ ocr ocr ~~ MN ocr ocr QQ .:;. ~ ~ 'Ö H ~ M~m "''''~ ~ ~ O'\O'\~ ~ _0 ¡::¡P< ~..: ..:¡::¡..:.:: __> ·8 ~ .r=¡ ~~ Q) ~ ~ø~· 4 .:: > ,,",OM oj: oj: M'" ~ ~..:oo NN _ ~ I ~ 00 Q) ~ 0 uu.;:.;: 5- ~ Q) 4 ~ ~ o 4 ~I P<P< P<P< P<P< P<P< P<¡::¡ P<p< ==.8 H Zoo ZOO ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 4 Q Q) 'Ö - - 0, Q) c:: - J.1 _ .LJ >t >t ,J.) tI) tI] tI] Q) ~ U ~1J1 - ·CLn .~"I;; " r-t-n 8 '..,.... 0 '>:0 ~ 'ÖUo 'Ö~o '~'Ö 8~Q 'Ö.JJ "'C'") ø.~ 'U ~ N ~ \D :>: ~ Zrt.I':; >000 '..-I~ . \D 'Ö> 'Ö... >.~ ~ ~ ~8 ..-I ~ 'ÖQ), 'Ö" ~U !::Q), !::ro, ""' ~ ~H\D I:Q!::M p,:E-t~ p,:';:¡M >,~~ >..JJ... ~ ø~~ .,.;, ... 'N >'IU UI~ UOM Q)~ ~H- ,....¡ro~ 1111 1I1fi1 Q) Z.JJ I 4~[/) rt.I';:¡ ro ~ Q)........ Q) I....... ,....¡ I:Q ..c:: UJ....... ..c:: \..I....... ~~S E-t ~.......~..., ~!:: ,....¡Z....... ~C1J ~..., ~ E-t . 0 \..I I r: en.... ro >M r: ro \..1M ro £::N ~ N It) ~ø.:; .JJ '" ,;:¡ 0 ';:¡UO >~o \..100 \..Iuo .~",,,,' ~~ II1.JJO :I:'~ ~ 00 OtC1J~ Ot '" ~"'''' ~rt.I~ ;:JOO~ >. ~ >'..-1'" >'~\D C1J..-IO Q)'Ö~ ~-- ~ E-t ~~ 'Ö C'") r: . ro C1J' ro I - ,....¡ ro - ,....¡ C1J _ 00 - !::,;:¡, ...,~~ ""E-t~ ""H~ C1J:I:... Q)~~ .. H-\D 0-_ 0-- 0-_ 8-ocr 8-N ~N~ A/t/If ..-0-'._-.,---·--· . - ----_._----------~-----~- .- - ---- ------ ... ------ ---- --- -- "-- -~--- ~I co'" "'~ uu N~ UU UU 0::0 0'" "'N ZZ ~N ZZ ZZ N=> "'''' "'''' o~ ~~ N~ "'N 1 ~ 'C .0 0> . :<::<:~¡,:¡ ro~ ..., P<P<>¡':¡ . . § OO<~ ~ID ~~ 0 MM r--", r--ID coro ",ro u \D .. .. . . . . . . , . ..., '" N~ U) "'''' -Ie -Ie IDr-- "'~ r--N 0 '" ~ 0 UU ~~ ~~ NN "'''' Z ~ ~ 1 U ~:<:-'O P:¡P:¡ -Ie -Ie UU P:¡P:¡ <P:¡ z P<~¡':¡ ~'" >¡,:¡ . . OO<P< "'~ "'M U) ~~ .. .. ~N ~~ U) , Z 0 UU 0 ,.:¡ U) H 0> 0:: c:: < 0 -- P< N ::;:~ ~ .... .... .... .... .... 'C ~ 0 ~I N'" IDN 00 COr-- "'0 N'" 0> . UOID 0::0 ~r-- r--", roN "'0 "'''' 0'" 0> ..., 0", N:I:> "'''' N'" ~'" 00 0'" ~ID 0- U)H", 10 ¡:: ~~ NN ~~ NN "'N "'M 0 OO::~ = U ¡,:¡ '" ~ ,.:¡ P< . :>: 8:><U) - 1 .0 '" '" Z<> ::;::<:~¡,:¡ ~r-- '" ID "'''' ~O ~~ N ¡,:¡ P<P<>¡':¡ . . · . . . . . . III $ ::;:0", Oo<~ "'''' OCO -Ie -Ie r--O M~ ID", 10"" ~ ~I", ~~ N~ ~N NN "'''' 0>11I .0 ¡,:¡O", MM 'CC ct H ::> U)::;:~ .. .. ......... 8 N~ U) U", ,.:¡~ ~ 0 uu P:¡U -Ie -Ie UP:¡ P:¡P:¡ <P:¡ c::'" < 1t) ,.:¡ H~ H '" 0:: '" ~ ¡,:¡ ,.... I '0 +.... 8 :<::<:~¡,:¡ r--", roo ro1t) ~~ ror-- 0:: <P<>¡':¡ . · . . . . . . . < <P< ID ID 00 -Ie -Ie r--r-- 1t)M ""'~ .. 00 U) ~~ NN ~~ NN M'" ~ "'''' c:: .. .. 0 ~N U) -.< ~~ 0 UU P:¡P:¡ -Ie-le UU <P:¡ P:¡P:¡ ..., U ,.:¡ ::> kk ...,::> 100 ~I P:¡P:¡ P:¡P:¡ I:QI:Q I:QI:Q I:QI:Q I:QI:Q c::= 0 ZU) ZU) ZU) ¡,:¡~ ¡,:¡~ ¡,:¡~ Uk 0> 'Cc. + ~ III ~ ~ ~ ..., 010 . · ~ I:Q ¡:: k 0> ..... 8 ""0 ..., ,.:¡ ~o U) ¡,:¡ 0-.< 8~0 U)r-- U)o U 'CID ...,:>: ZU)< M ro > k"", '" U o>ç: ¡':¡8 :r: ~ :r:M U '.-1 - 0 ~ ::>-.< ::;:HID ID ~ .c:o ro U)U 'C ~::;:", I~ . 10 'U 8", IU Z ~o> ¡,:¡ H- . . $ '" U)Z HZ . k U)":¡ $...,...... >I:Q I...... ..., ...... 11I11I 8 >U) <r:q...... >< ...... I...... U)t!I ..., 11I10 8 '0 < .... to I:Q.... Z.... 'C..., -r:q~< UO -'=""'0 ~ '0 Zo 'Co :r: 0 -.< . r:qr:q 'C......"'" ""1t)ID 'C...,'" . ID . k~ 1t)ro oc:: 0::U)1t) k.c: '" k '''' ct U)0 .¡J1t)'" .¡J"';ID .¡Jo~ z::> ~ 8~", "';.¡J ~ :; ~ ~ 0 ~ U) I . ~ U).c: ~ ~ro ~ U) - .c:"",,,, OU)~ k,.:¡", Hr-- 80 ct H"'" 8~~ ~-M ¡:¡~~ :::-N :r:~~ ~-IJ") ..~ A/~~- - .____ ____ _ __ _ uo__ on -- -. ---.- . _ 0____ ..'-. o _ - - - --- -- -- - - -. --"0-- - _0 --- -- c: QI ~I \D~ \DO"I ()() ()() "'0 ()() O.¡J· ~O \D(T) O\D ZZ ZZ ...... ZZ .... c: N:;¡:::> N... N~ ON .¡J;:> ~~ ~~ NN UO ( - ;:>U k .¡J..... I ",0 - 0 c:z ;:;::;:;::~¡,¡ 0 U "''''>¡'¡ 'tIU OO.o:~ "'Z (T)(T) (T)CO 0..0 1'0 II)N I' ID 0 \D .0.. . . . . . . . . . k 0.. N~ U) ID (T). (T)\D .;: .;: ...r-- CO ID ID II) 0 0.. ~ 0 NN NN ... (T) ~~ ...... ..... ~ ,.:¡ QI I ;:> - "0 ;:;::;:;:: '0 P:¡() ()P:¡ .;: .;: .0:< ()() .0:< ~ .o:"',,¡,¡ >¡,¡ III 00.0:'" .¡J~ (T)(T) U) IIIH .. .. "OH ~N 0", ~~ U) Z"' Z 0 III 0 ~ .-< U U) .;: H .-< ~ III .0: .... -- '" k ;:;::~ .... .... .... .... "'''' .... .... QI .... .... III.¡J ~ gOlD ~I 0..11) r--co o..ID (T) CO "'CO II)(T) .¡Jk . ~O 0.. ~ CON IDa IDN COli) ~ 0.. "'< "'-' 00.. N:r:> \DO ~(T) ~N ...... CON "'CO 0- c: U)Ho.. ~N ~~ ~~ ~~ ~N ~~ lAC: 0 ~ o¡,¡~ "'0 () ~ '" . "'.... ~ -..... 8><U) I - 0 '" II) (T) ;:;::;:;::~¡,¡ "'CO ...CO N(T) U ~ Z.o:> .... ¡,¡ "''''>¡'¡ . . · . . . "'''' ( ) ;:;::0", OO<~ 00.. (T)\D .;: .;: r--co .... ,...¡ ,,10.. N~ NN .... .... ~~ ....... '" ..0 ¡,¡0o.. (T)(T) '< O(T) 0.. .... '" rø H . tIS [J);:;::.... .. .. . . . .-< 8 N~ U) "'N IDo.. tlSU ~~ ~ 0 ()() ()P:¡ ...... .;: .;: ()() ...... .¡J < c.., ,.:¡ "''tI H 0.. OIV ~ 0.. '" - ........ ¡,¡ ,... I ,0 « « "'> 8 ;:;::;:;::,,¡,¡ r--o.. '< O~ N(T) "'IV ~ <"'>¡,¡ . · . . . -k .0: .0:'" N~ "'... .;: .;: "'''' '" 00 U) NN NN ........ - (T)", ......... .. .0 c: ~N U) IV ....~ 0 ()() ()P:¡ .;: .;: ()() e t>I ~ QI k'" ;:> Ok ~I P:¡P:¡ ¡!¡P:¡ P:¡P:¡ ¡!¡¡!¡ P:¡¡!¡ P:¡¡!¡ :>:0 '" ¡'¡3: ZU) ¡'¡3: ¡,¡~ ¡'¡3: ¡'¡3: k QI'tI ~ ~ Q,QI ~ c: ~ ~ UJ ..... UJ >. >. >. ~ "'''' QI ;:>. \.; () ~ ~ rø .,.:¡ .-<.,-, 8 Q)o « 0 ... ,.:¡ ~o 'Ö ....'tI 8~0 0\ co « .'" ¡;; .() 'Öco ~>. :.:'" zU).o: "'-'co '''''¡r-- . 'Ö> rø.... rø c: '" ¡'¡8 " 'Ö ( ) , 'Ö . ~() 0 c:.w ....'" ;:;::HID ~(T) ~8r-- ~,.:¡ \.;.... >.O() ~ ,,;:;:: N ~ .() >'I() . r:Q(T) ()IZ Q) ¡,¡ H- . I UJ I UJ¡'¡Z ( ) Z JJ k'" U)":¡ .w ........ Q) ......... Q)I ..-ir:Q [J) I........ ..c::\.;........ "'0 8 U)JJ ~.w ~c:"""" ..-iZ....... c..w 0-1 '" 8 '0 c:.... rø en.... Id >. Id k r:Q.... Id c:.... .¡J", ¡,¡,,< =:r:1o H 0 H()O >11)0 Idzo k()o "rim· ¡,¡¡,¡ 0.. :r:co 0.. 00 e CO 0\ ID C:'" t:t:U)1I) .w()N >; II) >;,...¡ ID >;CO ID OIl)N Q)'Ö... ::>- .- 8"-0'1 UJ~ , Id · , Id Q) , Id I , ,...¡, , .- ( ) , U) - r, U)0 .w¡:.¡co .w8(T) JJHCO IdH'< O Q);:;::~ -I< r:J-M O~~ O~N O~.... "'~'" 8~(T) --I< A/~¡' .............- . .-. ~ -~, , ..;; -- - - - - __________ ___ __ ______. __. ·"u___ u_ _.. _. ___.__ --- - -.- . --. .-.-. ----- -~'~ lO ~I "'0 lOC::> N lO o lO J:ZO r--c::> ~'" 0'" c::>~ UU uu ",,,-<> NIT) NO ~Il1 "'N ZZ ZZ ~~ "'N N~ NN ~ .0 :Z~r:1 "-<>r:1 lO<~ Il1N lO ~ IT) 0 COr-- c::>~ OC::> J . . . . . . . . . . . . tI) lOr-- r--IT) COCO r--aI -.:olO IT) IT) \.? Il1 0 ~~ NN ~~ ~~ NN IT) IT) aI ~ aI ~ ~ '0 UU P¡U UU UP¡ P¡< P¡P¡ ::;:~r:1 IV "-<>r:1 C <"-< 0 Il1 tI) N 'Ö I IV tI) IV Z '" 0 c. 0 ~ '" tI) '" H '" ¡::: :>: -=: an -- '" '" :z ~ 0 ... ... "'''' ... ... ... ... '" . U ID 'f :z c31 NIT) r--o -.:olD ""'c::> OCO IT)r-- IV .... ~aI r--~ COCO allD IT) 0 Il1~ NO 'Ö t: [l)Oal ""'''-<> "'ID Il1a1 OlD N~ r--CO 0"", " .... 0 OO~ ~~ IT)~ N~ NN IT)N Il11T) U U ~H C ~ ¡::: . H 8r:1[1) ~ .0 IT) Z"-<> ::;:~r:1 ""'C::> -.:0-.:0 aI"", allD ~IT) , r:1 "'>r:1 · . . . . . . . . . + IV :Z::;:Il1 ID<~ IDIl1 alCO r--c::> o IT) N-.:o .-' o-i t:J"-<aI ~~ --'N"N ~~ ~~ NN IT) IT) .Q [:)-0\ CO-.:o It! [I) ~ I . 8 tI) It) ID ~ It) Il1 0 UU NN ~U UU P¡I!¡ I!¡ I!¡ -=: aI ~ H aI 'Ö ¡::: ~ ~ IV 1=1 '0 I!¡ I!¡ "'.... 8 :Z~1=1 OlD r--~ NO N'" N ID ....C ¡::: "'>r:1 · . . . . . . . . . "''' -=: <"-< r---.:o COCO IDr-- NIT) ~~ Q...Q -.t) Il1 tI) ~~ ~~ ~~ NN IT) IT) .... "'.... 1 "'0 tI) ~Z -.:0 0 UU UU UU I!¡P¡ I!¡P¡ ~ t) "'Z ~I ~P¡ P¡~ ~~ ~P¡ ~P¡ ~P¡ Zrp r:1~ r:1~ r:1~ r:¡-~ r:1~ , ~ ~ · ~ ~ .... .... ~... P¡ t: '" 8 [1)0 UO ~ ~o tI) r:1 '" 8~0 r-- >N '00 'OlD :>: Z[I)< :I: IT) U-.:o loiN 101-.:0 Il1 U c r:18' ~ ~ .....IT) ..... ~ 0 ~ .... :ZHID lID 'r-- .c ~ . .co CO ·[I)U ~::;:aI + ~ r:11T) . 8111 8 IT) IU JZ IV'" r:1 H- . · . N HZ . ....... tI)~ Q)........... '0 I....... . I I....... .... ....... "'''' 8 >[1) ~ ....... I....... [I) I!¡ Q '" 8 '0 -=: ... :t", ~ ~... Z... ....'" r:1~ UO CIS 00 ZO Zo '00 :I: 0 ....'" r:1r:1 '0.......-.:0 ""o-iN . -.:0 . ID . H~ Il1CO C'" ~tI)Il1 H.c IT) .....rlC"l ""Il10 ""Il1C"1 .........ID ""o~ 0- - 8~C"I ......... ~ c:..... ~ tl)1 ~ [1)1 ~ tI).c ~ rnco ~ [I) - .c-.:oC"l O~N H-.:o Hr-- 80 IOH-.:o 8~~ P¡~IT) ~-N =-N :I:~"", r:1~Il1 ~'" ..Al'l2. _._-_._-~~_._--_.._-- - ~...._-_. - - --.-------..- ----,-,,_. -----.-.-. --- _._---- ------- --. ---- ----------- -- n _ ._ LOU") LOLO ~ ~I 00 ~N ~~ ~~ MN I~O ~N ~~ M~ ~~ ~M ~~> a~ ~~ ~~ MN ~N \ NT"'"" T"'""T"'"" '1""""_ -.0 Ze¡r:¡ P<>r:¡ ~.:;¡;¡ _N ro~ ~~ ~~ NM I ... . . . .. .. ~ M~ ~N ON ~_ ~'I"""" ~ ~ 0 NN NN NN _N NN a\ ~ a\ ,... - . 0 CH.J ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ u ¡¡¡ .:; ¡¡¡ Ze¡r:¡ p<>r:¡ .:;'" I/) [J) 1 [J) Z .... 0 o ~ [J) H I>:: .:; - '" m Z ~ - 0 <qI<qI MM NN -.::0...,. MM m . U ~ ~ ~I MN om ~~ ~~ ~_ 0 ~ -m I~O D~ NO ~~ ~~ ~~ U":I ~ [J)Orn ...."'> ~co MM 1/).... MN N,... ~ o 00r- N_ '1""""_ __ '1""""_ m U ...:!H ~ ~ 1>::. Eo< r:¡ [J) - C ~ M ZP<> Z~r:¡ I/) co ~I/) 1/)"" " r:¡ ",>r:¡. . . . ~ ~ ZZI/) .:;'" M,... Om ~ C,!)~O\ \D tI) NN NN NN N,- NN ~ ~-O\ _~ ~N ~~ ~ tI) _ I . . .. . . 8 ~ ~'I"""" MM ~~ ...:! I/) I/) 0 UU NN NN ¡¡¡¡¡¡ NN .:; a\ ~ H a\ I>:: ,..._ r:¡ . C ¡:¡ C!:I C!:I C!:I <.:; m m Eo< Ze¡r:¡ 0.... ~,... ~~ I>:: '" > r:¡ .. . . m m .:; .:; P< .... N rn ro C C ~.,.. LO [J) N N _ T"'"" 1""'100::1" . ~~ I ~~ [J) ~~ .... 0 ¡¡¡U ¡¡¡U ~ "'.... ~I ¡:¡¡¡¡ C!:IC!:I ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ~ r:¡~ Z[J) Z[J) r:¡~ r:¡~ ~ ~ - Q.) "Ö- UJ > ~ ¡.¡ 0. ¡.¡ <", . .,..¡ 0", :I: Eo< ~o O'~ ..co ~o "- Eo< ~ C 0\ CO ~ N 'Ö [J) Eo< CO .-i ~ :.: Z [J) < ~ co 0\", > N.-i I/) ~ r:¡Eo< ;:3, ~,.-i¡:: I, OM, ..... ZH~ I>::M ~o ¡¡¡.,..¡o ~ :t:.... C)~O'\ N eH_ met) r-i_ .,.... Q)rn r:¡H- 'I 1-10 .-iZM ~ 11)1 I;~ [J)...:! ~........ Q ........ ~ ~ .,..¡........ >........ m ~ Eo< [/)~ 1 'M 1 1-1 < ¡.¡ UJ Eo< . C ~.... 0. '" 1-1........ .J.).,< It!M ~N r:¡e¡< =r:¡o 0'0 ~, mo II)Eo _...~ r:¡r:¡ '" 'µ~rn m~N ';:3~ 0\01/) ~~ - I>::[J)I/) ~UN .-i[J)CO ;:3[/)0 ~'Öa\ ~.-iO ~~ - Eo<~rn m ~'.-i ''Ö rn [J) ~, ~ ~ ' [/) - ~[J)o 'M~M ~...:!CO HI/) 1-1"'1/) ~-M ~-_ H-~ ~-'I"""" 0-_ ~N ,4 l'If - _,_,__, ____"_n_ _ __,_'.___"._ _ ______.____.'u ____.._~_____.._~__.__,_____ : - .---- - - _.-- ---- ---- - ---- ---- ._--. ----_._- . ._-. -.-- -- -.-. .--- . ____on __. n_ --- "" '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" ~I NN O\N ~M 0'" ~ r- r- 0 '::;:0 r-r- ~CO ~O\ 00\ O\M a;)N ",Po.> N", M1l"> ~1l"> 1l">M "'0' a;) 0\ ~~ N~ ~~ NN MM N~ ~ I: ° 0'" ~ .0 ..... u ::;:e>riI 1l">r- M1l"> ::> Po.>riI · · · · " ",<~ 01l"> 1l">", ..... NN ~~ II] or- NO ~r- I: ° I . . . . . . U [/) .;: .;: NN C01l"> "'''' '" 1l"> 0 tJ¡:Q "'M tJtJ NN "'''' '0 0\ ~ ItI '" ° " ~ ~ '0 .;: .;: <¡:Q ¡:Q¡:Q « ° ::;:e>riI r-", 1l">r- ..... Po.>riI · · · · ~ <Po. OM 1l">M QlH ::>H 1l"> [/) NN ~~ '0 1tI~II] I ..... II] [/) ItIItIItI Z '" 0 tJtJ tJtJ e......... 0 ~ ItIU "''0 [/) '" .... H "'Oltl ¡¡:: """'Z-r-i < " -- Po. QI ..... ::;: "'ok " ~ 0 ~ ~ N N ,., ,., "'~ N N NN -=: tJ '" 'f ::;: (31 1l">O\ "'''' 01l"> MN "'M '" '" - .:..> ~O\ 0'" 1l">'" 1l">M NN ~'" 0\ '" I: I: [/)00\ ",Po.> N1l"> ~O\ r- '" M~ N'" r- 1l"> ° , 0 OO~ ~~ ~ ~ NM MN N~ ..... tJ ~H ..... ~ ¡¡:: . ItI E<(:1[/) ~.O U 0.. 0'" r M ZPo.> ::;:e>(:1 1l">N 1l">'" .... riI Po.>riI · · · · ..... - Q) ::;:::;:1l"> ",<~ "'1l"> "'''' II] .-I e>Po.'" ~N NN NN ~~ N N NN II] .0 r::J-rn ",N CON <'IN '" a;) ItI .... ro [/) ~ 1 . . . . . . . . u E< [/) MCO MM Mr- "'''' ItIItI ~ c') 1l"> 0 tJ¡:Q "'M "'''' tJtJ MN "'''' ..........'0 < '" ~ ItIItIQI H '" cell] 0'" ¡¡:: ,.... ~ ,.,"'> [i¡ '0 « « <¡:Q < <. "''''QI E< ::;:e>riI ,....~ "'''' "'''''' ¡¡:: Po.>riI · · · · ~~ < <Po. "'''' "'1l"> -=--:- U] - , 1l"> [/) ~N ~~ ..... "''''1: 1 QI [/) e '" 0 tJ¡:Q tJtJ 0> QI ~ II] " 0 ~I ¡:Q¡:Q ¡:Q¡:Q ¡:Q¡:Q ¡:Q¡:Q ¡:Q¡:Q ¡:Q¡:Q .... Z[/) riI~ riI~ riI~ riI~ riI~ '0 QI ~ ~ ..... I: ~ ~ k ~ II] >. >. >. .u '" ::> ...... tJ :3:", '" ro ' t:", .~'" :c '0 E-t ok 0 ~O ~o :3:0 'OtJo 'O~o Do ItI E<~O ok 'M 1><", o~o '0 CO ø:: N ø:: '" :>: Z[/)< 0.-1 r- 0 \!) 'OtJ\!) ro~ 'O~ >.'" II] . rilE-t '0 Q) ~ '0 . ~ ø:: > ~ 0 t: Q) ~ t: ro ~ I: ItI ~ ..... :t ::;:H'" ø::E-tr- ø::~M tJco k~ >.::;: 1l"> >,..µ T"'"" e>::;: ~ 'N >. ,.... o ¡:QM tJl", tJOM QlItIUJ riI H- '" 1 ",(:1 Q)I .u .:..> I ".....0 [/)~ Q) ........ Q) I....... ..-1 ....... [/) I....... .0"'....... 'Ok....... 1tI1tI,.:¡ E-t ~.u ~t: .-I¡:Q 0.Q) o..u 0 E-t '0 ro[/)oqo ro>M ro Z'" 1-1 ¡:Q", ro kN ro t:N II] '" .....N'" rile> < ...:¡ 0 "':¡tJo >0 roZo 1-100 I-ItJo ....."'''' riIriI :::CO N 1l">M e CO OIII)M 01 '" 1:"'- - ¡¡::[/)1l"> >. 1l"> >'.-1'" >.01l"> 01l">N Q) .-I .... Q) '0 '" ::0- E<~'" ro · ~ ro Q) ~ roco ~ .-I I ~ .-Iro ~ .-IQ) ~ [/) - ':">(:1CO ':">E<N ':">HCO roH", Q):::r- 1I)::;:r- ok O~~ O~,.... O~,.... I><~M E<~M E<~N ~Nok ,/11'19 ~ ___..._. _.' ..AIl.. 9f_th~ t",~1y~_segl!l.ep!:~. studied during. the AM· period· operate- at - . LOS C or better for data averaged over this two hour study period (from 7 AM to 9 AM). \ Of the 12 segments designated for study during the Mid-day period, 2 segments (one on Broadway and one on Otay Lakes Rd.) could not be studied due to road construction. The remaining 10 segments continue to operate at LOS C or better during this time period. Of these studied segments, two segments (one on Third Ave. and one on Palomar St.) operate in the lower half of the LOS C range of average travel speeds during the Mid-day period. The LOS C range of average travel speeds for a class III arterial is 13 MPH to 19 MPH. On Third Ave., this lower Level of Service C condition exists during the following times: Third Ave. (C st. to H st.) - Class III Speed MPH Above Direction Time LOS (MPH) LOS D NB 11:30 - 12:30 C 15.4 2.4 NB 12:30 - 1:30 C 14.8 1.8 SB 11:30 - 12:30 C 1{.9 1.9 '- Further analysis of existing data for Third Ave. (refer to Appendix 6) indicates that this segment· operates near the middle of the range of average travel speeds for LOS C during most of the mid-day period. This data also indicates that this segment operates at 13.8 MPH (0.8 MPH above LOS D) for one. 30 minute period (from 1:00 - 1:30 PM) for northbound traffic. However, it must be noted that this 13.8 MPH value represents an average 6f only 3 data runs_~nd, therefore, should be considered only as an indication of the travel speed experienced during this time. The Traffic Monitoring Program is intended to measure the operating efficiency of arterial streets in the City. Arterial streets are defined in the Traffic Element of the General Plan as surface highways having a signal spacirig of less than two miles with average weekday traffic volumes greater. than 10,000 vehicles per day; Because of the characteristics of Third Ave. from C st. to H st., this segment should not be considered an arterial segment for the purposes of the Traffic Monitoring Program. Traffic volumes on Third Ave. between C st. and E st. are currently 7240 vehicles per day and have not exceeded 10,000 vehicles per day since 1989. Between E st. and G st. the traffic volumes range from 11,290 to 15,150 vehicles per day but this portion of Third Ave. is also designated as the central downtown business district. The speed '- 19 19 1St) . -.-._--. -----".~-~.~-~_.._._---_.~-_.- - .___.___limit.in__thi:>. a~ea_.ish:2_!;_):1J)H_, _apg.le_parking_along__both sides -of. the.-- -- . street restricts Third Ave. to one. lane in each direction between E st. and F st.; and wide ·sidewalks with large planters exist which narrow the approaches to intersections at Davidson St., F St. and G Street. Only the portion of Third Ave. from G st. to H St. is outside of the central downtown business district and carries sufficient traffic to be considered an arterial street for the purposes of the TMP. Therefore, it is recommended that Third Ave. from C st. to G st. be exempted from the Threshold Standards and be removed as an arterial segment from the TMP. Third Ave. from G st. to H st. would become pàrt of the TMP segment currently studied between H st. and Naples st. and would continue to be studied as part of the Traffic Monitoring Program. One segment of Palomar st. (between Broadway and the northbound ramps to I-5) also operates in the lower half of the LOS C range of average travel speeds during the Mid-day period. This lower Level of Service C condition exists during the following times: Palomar st_ (I-!; NB Ramps to Broadway) - Class III -- Speed MPH Above Direction Time LOS (MPH) LOS D WB 11:30 - 12:30 C 14.6 1.6 Further analysis of existing data (Appendix 6) indicates that, similar to Third Ave., Palomar st. also operates near the middle of the range of average travel speeds for LOSC except for one 30 minute period (from 12:00 - 12:30 PM) where this segment. operates at 13.8 MPH (0.8·MPH above LOS D) in the westbound direction of traffic. Delay along this segment primarily occurs. at the- I-5 northbound ramps and· occasionally at the intersections' of Murrell Dr. /Palomar st. and Industrial Blvd./Palomar street. . For the 1996 TMP, seventeen segments were designated for study during the PM period. Of these 17 segments, 1 segment on Otay Lakes Rd. could not be studied due to road construction. The remaining 16 segments continue to operate at LOS C or better during this time period. Of these studied segments, two segments (one on Otay Lakes Rd. and one on Palomar st.) operate in the lower half of the LOS C range of average travel speeds during the PM period_ The following is a list of these segments: 20 .~ /1 Is-I --.- . .- . - -- _u____ _ - - --,-_ 0l:ay:LakesRd_ -(East -H-St-.-·to-Tel-.-Canyon -Rd. )-..:; -Class-II -~ Speed .MPH Above ( Direction Time LOS (MPH) LOS D NB -4:00_ 5:00 C 20.7 2.7 NB 5:00 - 6:00 C 20.5 2.5 Palomar st. (I-5 NB Ramps to Broadway) - Class III Speed MPH Above Direction Time LOS (MPH) LOS D EB 4:00":; 5:00 C 15.5 2.5 EB 5:00 - 6:00 C 15.3 2.3 WE 4:00 - 5:00 C 13.7 0.7 - WE 5:00 - 6:00 C 14.5 -1.5 Further analysis of the data collected (Appendix 6) indicates that Palomar St. operates at 13.5 MPH (0.5 MPH above LOS D) for 30 minutes in the evening (from 4:30 PM to 5:00 PM) in the eastbound direction. Westbound, Palomar St. operates near the _lower limit of \. LOS C (wi thin 1. 0 MPH of LOS D) for one and a half hours (from 4: 00 '- to 5:00 PM and from 5:30 to 6:00 PM). As during the mid-day period, westbound traffic experiences delay primarily at the I-5 northbound ramps; for eastbound traffic, the delay occurs at the intersection of Broadway and Palomar Street. There are currently two future CIP projects planned for Palomar st. west of Industrial Boulevard. One project would provide topographic mapping and traffic data to Caltrans for the preparation of a project ~udy report for the I-5/Palomar st. interchange. The second project would construct the ultimate street improvements on Palomar st. from Industrial Blvd. to the I-5 northbound ramps. The existing field data collected for the PM period on Otay Lakes Rd. was also· analyzed to obtain LOS values for one half hour intervals. However, the standard deviation - for some of the intervals was too great to provide statistically acceptable results (with a minimum acceptable level of confidence of 60%). The results of this analysis (Appendix 6), however, indicate that Otay Lakes Rd. operates near the lower limit of LOS C (0.7 MPH above LOS D) in the northbound direction for 30 minutes in the evening (from 5:00 to 5:30 PM). This lower Level of Service C condition is due to delay at the intersection of East H st. and Otay Lakes Rd. The City has a CIP project under design for this intersection to construct duel left turn lanes for northbound and southbound - 21 FI/S"':< "_"'"_H _ __"__.__.._ ____~____~_ . _-- -- traft:ic on Otay.LakesuRd. at..this location.._Construction_of_this____. projecf· -is currently on· hold pending the undergrounding of utilities in this area. Once completed, this project will improve the - LOS for otay Lakes Rd. by increasing the· capaci ty of the intersection. The Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify that . LOS C or better, as measured by observed average travel speed, shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments except that during peak hours LOS D can occur fOr no more than any two hours of the day. Table 2 indicates that 41 arterial segments were designated for study during this year's program. Of these 41 segments, 3 segments could not be studied due to road construction; the remaining 38 segments operate at LOS C or better during each of the three peak traffic periods (AM, Mid-day and PM). Since the results of this year's study indicate that all arterial segments operate at LOS C or better during each of the peak traffic periods during the day, therefore, the Threshold Standards have been met , for the 1996 Traffic Monitoring Program. ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS In addition to studying arterial segments within the City, information was gathered for arterial interchange segments (arterial segments crossing freeway interchanges). Although these segments are not subject to the Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan, LOS measurements on these segments are a growth management consideration in situations were proposed developments have a significant impact at interchanges. Therefore, these segments were included for study in the TMP program for information purposes only. Due to the short length of arterial interchange segments anti- the close spacing of traffic signals in these areas,· travel times obtained on any given segment could vary significantly. Because of the wide variation in the field data, it was not possible to achieve an 80% level of confidence for the segment on H st. at I-5 (between Bay Blvd. and Woodlawn Ave.) without doing a prohibitive number of data runs. Therefore, studies were limited to 40 data runs with a level of confidence of less than 80% for the following study periods and directions of travel: 7 - 9 AM (EB) 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM (EB & WE) 4 - 5. PM (WE), 5 - 6 PM (WE) For the 1996 TMP, the arterial interchange segments studied during each time period were those that were found to operate at LOS D during the 1995 TMP study. Additional studies were done on H st. 22 --- ---. ~ -- - -- -. ----- - - ---- ---- -- - - - . ---- ,q/S3 .. u ."" - --. - aLI-5-and East-H St. at- I-80S to- -maintain current information on these segments. As part of this year's study, the classification of the arterial interchange segment at I~805 and otay Valley Rd. was reevaluated subsequent to the construction of traffic signals at the northbound and southbound ramps at this interchange. As a result of this evaluation, the segment was reclassified from a class I to a class II segment. Class I segments are characterized by free flow traffic speeds that range from 35 MPH to 45 MPH. These segments have less than 4 signals per mile, no parking and generally no access to abutting properties. Class II segments have free flow traffic speeds that range from 30 to.35 MPH, there are from four to eight traffic signals per mile, there is some parking and access to abutting properties is limited. Although there is no parking along this short portion of Otay Valley Rd. and the free flow traffic speeds are characteristic of a class I segment, the new traffic signals bring the equivalent number of signals per. mile to seven and there is limited access to existing abutting properties. The addition of these signals at I-80S and Otay Valley Rd., therefore, makes this roadway more characteristic of a class II segment than - a class I. For this reason, this segment has been reclassified from a class I to class II arterial interchange segment and has been restudied for this year's program. The results obtained for the 1996 study are presented in the following tables. Table 4 provides information on LOS, average travel speed and travel time for each segment studied. This information is summarized in Table 5 which shows the number of -- segments of each classification which conform to each LOS during each time period_ Finally, Table 6 presents LOS and average travel speed for each segment, comparing 1995 data with' the information obtained in 1996. - , ~ 23 --- .. -~-~ ~. - -- - - R/S-r _ ___. _..·___..·..._m..·________.______ ",____ _n_.. -~-- - - -.- - ---- ~' -- - Table 4 -..- "-'-- .--- - ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS 1996 T~~ SEGMENT LOS AM PERIOD . I-5 - TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 7-9AM TIME HR ADT (YR) DIR. . LOS~ (Min:Sec) YQ!, H st_ (Class III) Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn EB C 14.3 0:42.1 1363 30,460 ('96) WB C 14_7 0:41.1 1237 Palomar st. (Class III) , Bay Blvd.- Industrial EB C 14.3 1:38.5 1294 31,180 ('96) WB B 19.7 1: 11. 7 1475 - I-80S = TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 7-9AM TIME HR ADT (YR) DIR. LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) YQ!, East H st. (Class II) Hilltop - Hidden Vista EB B 26.8 2; 10.1 29414 54,180 ('94) WB B 29.9 1:56.6 43464 Otay Valley Rd_ (Class II) 14545 Melrose - Oleander EB C 22.4 1:09.2 22,380 ('95) WB C 19.0 1 ;21.5 13905 TOTAL ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS: 4 4 1994 Data 5 1995 Data 24 - .- .-..--- ----- n u -. -.- '--. . /9/~b - -... - -- -- - ~ - "-" -"Table 4 (Cont.) -- - ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS 1996 TM? SEGMENT LOS MID-DAY PERIOD" 1-5 - TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 11:30-12:30 12:30- 1 :30 TIME HR ADT (YR) DIR. . LOS SPEED LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) VOL H st. (Class III) Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn EB C 13.3 C 14.9 0:42.9 3012 30,460 ('96) WB D 10.5 D 9.6 0:59.8 2424 Palomar St. (Class III) Bay Blvd:- Industrial EB C 14.7 1 :36.1 2044 31,180 ('96) WB C 14.5 1 :37.5 2240 ~ -- TRAVEL 2 SEGY2NT 11 :30-12:30 12:30- 1 :30 TIME· HR ADT (YR) DIR. LOS SPEED LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) VOL East H St. (Class II) Hilltop - Hidden Vista EB C 23.5 2:28.8 31024 - 54,180 ('94) WB B 29.2 1 :59.7 36334 Otay Valley Rd. (Class II) 14225 Melrose - Oleander EB C 21.6 1: 11.6 22,380 ('95) WB C 23.8 1 :05.0 15135 TOTAL ARTI:RIAL ~æANGE SEGMENTS: 4 4 1994 Data 5 1995 Data " Single en~es centered between two columns are 2 hour average values. 25 "- /I /.s-/, .-.,' ---,.--.-....-.---.--- . ,.-...-..-,--... .."...,.....--- ·- .-- . Table·4 (Cont.) ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS 1996 TMP SEGMENT LOS PM PERIOD" ~ TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 4 - 5 PM 5 - 6 PM . TIME HR , ADT (YR) DIR. LOS SPEED LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) VOL ESt. (Class III) Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn EB C 17.1 0:50.2 2102 25,320 ('96) WB 0 11.6 C 14.3 1 :07.1 1546 H st. (Class III) Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn EB C 17.3 0:34.8 2480 30,460 ('96) WB D 10.8 D 10.1 0:57.7 2216 Palomar st. (Class III) Bay Blvd.- Industrial EB D 9.7 D 11.9 2:12.6 2500 31,180 ('96) WB C 14.3 1 :38.5 2396 I-805 = TRAVEL 2 SEGMENT 4 - 5 PM 5 - 6 PM TIME HR ADT (YR) DIR. LOS~ LOS SPEED (Min:Sec) VOL East H st. (Class II) Hilltop - Hidden Vista EB· D 17.5 C 18.4 3: 14.8 50234 54,180 ('94) WB A 32.6 1: 47.2 34074 Otay Valley Rd. (Class II) 17785 Melrose - Oleander EB C 20.7 1: 14.6 22,380 (' 95) WB C 20.1 1: 17.1 17575 TOTAL ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS: 5 4 1994 Data 5 1995 Data * Single entries centered between two columns are 2 hour average values. 26 ~/.s-7 Table 5 - 1996 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment Performance i AM PERIOD 7AM-9AM CLASS LOS I II III TOTAL A - - - - B - 1 - 1 B/C* - - 1 1 C - 1 1 2 D-F - - - - MID-DAY PERIOD - 11:30 AM - 1:30 PM CLASS LOS I II III TOTAL ·A - - - - B/C* - 1 - 1 \ C - 1 1 2 '.- C/D* - - 1 1 D-F - - - - PM PERIOD 4 PM - 6 PM CLASS LOS I II III TOTAL A - - - - A/D* - 1 - 1 C - 1 - 1 C/D* - - 3 3 D-F - - - - * Indicates segments operating at different LOS's in different directions. -- ,4/.s-? 27 :.._~-., -- ~ ~ ~ ~. - - - - - - -. --..- - --- --. - -- ._u _._ - - _ _ u - --- Ne:ë3 '" I- .". on O:,..:¡ "'''' '" I- N",O UU UU -> "'N "'.". > zZ ZZ ~~ -~ ~ ~ ·0 '" I- '" I- -0 CD'" ...0 :&ø'" - · . :&ø", . . - - ID <>'" .".... .".'" ID <>'" "'''' "'''' '" <I'. ~~ -~ '" <I'. "'''' "'~ '" '" u:> '" '" u:> "i ~ ~ I I ... 31 §I c I- uu Ua:! I- a:! a:! uu .§ ... ~ ~ '" u:> ...... ...... ...... ,..:¡ 1-1- o~ ,..:¡ -'" ...0 C> ~ ",0:0 CD"" "'CD ",0:0 ...... on", z -- :;:z "'> ~'" "'''' "'> "'''' ...'" - -~ "'... -~ 5° ø · 0: u:>. '" ... ","" u:> ~.o ~.o · ¡...o: '" ",ID "'C!) "'''' c z<-O"I '" :&ø'" . · . :&ø'" . ... HC,¡CO'\ ø <>'" "'''' N'" <>'" "'0 0> :&o~ O'\-=:~ -~ ~- Ch<~ "'''' ,.,,., 0> ID ~ ~I ~ ,..:¡o.... ~I OCD OJ < u 0: . . . .... H[I)~tI) Ü '" I '" I CD I- ... .!) 0:01'.> g¡ '" tJ) '" tJ) "'''' '" '" '" CD ° uu o a:! '" CD ° "'< ¡... E-4~:EU") !a ~ ,..:¡ ~ ,..:¡ O:¡...<'" .c::z-'" .... « '" ~ :2 ~ ~ 1'.:& -0 "'0 ...CD ·0 "'... :&ø .... :&ø'" . · :&ø'" - . E-<", g¡ <>'" .".'" on CD <>'" ono "'U:> <I'. -- ~~ <I'. "'''' '" E-< CD u:> CD tJ) '" ~ I , ... - tJ) '" I- 0 UU uu I- 0 a:! < · ,..:¡ ,..:¡ ... · - .. c '" ,., E-< 0> 0> Z ~ '" :& ,., ø 0: a:! a:! a:! a:! 0: a:! a:! "'''' '" .... "'3: "'3: .... "'3: "'3: '" 0 0 '" - ø .... z .... < - -'" '" L .... ......... '" u " .... ....'" ........ 0: 0 - H....O ..... UOJ '" :I: 0 H '" tIl.~~ "'> ~'O E-< L ¡... HC... ¡... '" C Z ~ E-<-O H 30 _ ........ - E-<-O '" .", H ZtJ)< "'0 u.....~ z"'< ....'Ou '0 OJ ~ œ "'E-< "'....'" ~"'''' "'¡... u.....z o:....u ,..:¡ ~ :&H'" "''0 :> :&HID ~'" :.,OZ < ~ ø:E:'" "'0...... - '0...... ø:&", - ,...... H '" H- ....0 .....c "'H- OJ ,...... 0: c "',..:¡ u 3:... "'H... "',..:¡ ..... c.,. .... '" ~ ¡... ~ 0 0 ¡... tf.IOO ""¡OJ E-< E E-< ·0 '''' klCD E-< '0 .....CD ","'0 0: ",ø< '" '" '" ",ø< =11"""I...... >OCD < . "'''' . :., - e :., - "'''' .... - ....'" ~ 0:tJ)'" ....."'1- 0"'''' 0:"'''' ............. :.,.... - ,..:¡ ... E-<~'" tJ)a:!'" ...."'''' E-<-'" "''''''' "'OJ'" < " tJ) - '" tJ) - '" .....:&'" ¡... :::> '" Po '" ° ° ¡... ~ -- ;:JIS"? . n__·_. ____ ____...__u______··· --------------. ""-----. - --- - ~" -. ----- ." " - "...:¡ "- N"" ""0 ...:¡ tJU UU 0:0 -N ..,...,. 0:0 ZZ ZZ N=:> 0..,. ON N:I;> MN NN - o '0 "'''' o '0 M¡:¡", . M¡:¡", 00>'" ..,.'" ..>", ~<'" ~ ~<'" , '" I '" '" ~ '" 0 ,..'" 0 "'N "'c:> C '" M '" '" M '" . . . 0 '" .. 0 UO ..,...,. '" u 0 M'" ~M ... ~ N ...:¡ ~- ~ N ...:¡ NN NN 0 - ~ è ... c UU U<l1 UU C 0- 0 MIt) 0- 0 8 f"') 0rij . M '", ..¡:¡'" MO uel", ~ N>'" N>'" -<", -- ~<", 0 1 , ... 0 0 œ M '" M tI) ~ u ° uo .. ° ." ~ ...:¡ ~ ,..:¡ ~ - ~ .. ... .. ." 0 Z '" tI) ~~ ~~ ~~ ¡:¡ E-< ...:¡ CO,.. ..,.co ...:¡ NM NM Z Z NO:O "'0 CO'" NO:O OM N_ . -- <Z '" :I; > 00 CON :I; > -'" ..,.It) "'0 :<: NN ~N MM ~- U", ¡:¡ o:...~ '" - '" tI) 0...... CI NN M'" - .0 M_ . E-< 0: 0", 0 .¡.J Z<O", '" Mc."t::I . . . M¡:¡'" c: J-jQ.¡H", ¡:¡ 00>'" N_ M"" u>'" "'0 ° :>:0:_ Z -<'" -- ~- ~I ~<'" NM U ...:¡O'" ::: ~I ' tI) , tI) ~ <U'" . Ü It) 0 .., 0 '" H[I)>Ctf.1 '" M tI) '" M tI) N '" ·¡;jO<> c: "2 - '" '" u ° 00 UU '" .. 0 <11< .. .. f-i~9U1 ~ N ...:¡ ~ N ...:¡ ... ( ) E-< C .-< ~E--4CO'\ Z ~ - ~ - .0 <ZHO\ ... .. .. u 11> ¡,¡:>:- - ... 8 "':>:- ...:¡ < 0 '0 "'CO "'c:> 0 '0 "'''' 0 :>:to M¡:¡'" . MeI'" . z E-<", ... ¡;¡ u>'" ""N ..,.'" u>'" ""N ",'" N<'" -- .~- NoO;'" NM U '" E-< ~ '" ~ tI) z '" ~ I , ~ 0 0 ..,. M tI) M tI) .. 0 UO UU .. 0 <11< ~ ...:¡ ~ ...:¡ - ~ ... '" E-< .. Z ... '" .. :>: Q ¡:¡ ~ 0: "'<11 "'''' 0: "'<11 "'<11 '" en ... "'''' "'3: . ... "'''' "'''' '" ~ 0 0 '" - to ~ ... Z ... < - -11> :I; ... ......, It)\.< U ... ...It) .-<( ) 0: - 0 "''-<0 ..... U'C '" ... '" tI)~~ It) > -c: 8 8 ...c:..,. 8 It) 11> Z 8-0 ...:< - .-<\.< E-<-O 11> .( ) ... ZtI)oO; 11>0 U.µ..: ZtI)< .-<'CU '0.-< "'8 It)'-<M -It)M "'E-< U.....Z C:OU ...:¡ ii:. :>:...'" It) '0 :> :>:....'" -:I; Z < to:>:", 11>0...... . '0...... ¡:¡:>:'" , ,...... >., ... :>: '" ....- '-<0 ""c: '" ....- ( ) ...... 0: C "'...:¡ Ua:... "'...~ "'...:¡ ..., e..- .-<( ) '" ~ 8 - 0 0 8 "'00 '-<It)e 8 œ 8 '0 , '" \.<,'" 8 '0 ...,'" roo", c: ~ "'¡:¡< '" 11> N "'to < ::::......... >\.<M < .. "'''' . ... - a >. _ "'''' .-< .-< c· 0:"'''' ""11>,.. 011>..,. 0: "'It) "-,.; '0:::' >'( )N ...:¡ ... 8-'" "'<I1N '-<<I1M E-<-", 1t):I;1t) ro:>:N < ·C '" - ro '" - 11> ..., 8 => :: '" '" 0 0 8 - I9-IIAO ~".__.'_..__.__~___m ._._..____.____. -_.~.+---- ~ - '"'I N\.D 0\.0 0\.0 ~I UU uu ~O O~ W..... O~ ~O ZZ ZZ N=> -~ ~N ~M NX> N~ NN NN . - ~ '0 M _ 0'\ '0 "'=I' :E"¡.¡ :O:"¡.¡ . ~>~ "'=I' 0 ~ ~>~ ~ <~ ...... .,.... ..- <~ ..- \D 00 \D ~ \.0 I M M \D I \D r-_ C7'I tI) 'U '0 O· 0"1 tf) U. C7'I ~ 0 r- r- ~ m ~ 0 N 00 ..- H ..- ..- ...... - ~ M NN .....0 U\O UC() r---U .....0 Lt')< UU :E . ¡.¡ :E . ¡.¡ ~~~ ...... 0 0'\ ~~~ r- _1:l4 ...... ..- ...,.p.¡ ..- Lt')-tf) Lt')-tf) I I '" a a a '" a -g oc:r 0 ~ 0 ~ ,.:¡ ,.:¡, 8 ... £ r:.1 tf.I H ~\D ~1D M~ H M~ aJr- ~ ~ N~O 0'\...0 MO NN N~O NO l-Lt') ~ ~ ~ > 0...0 N_ M_ -> O~ r-r- =Z X N_ NN NM Lt')M __ UO " c:'" ¡.¡ _ wH ~..... ..... E-tD:: \D .0 t""'-'<::I" \DO \DCO .0 NO oW Z<-<3> ¡.¡ :E,,¡.¡ " :E,,¡.¡. ~ H~CO'\ ~ ~>~ aJ~ Lt')_ 0'<::1" ~>~ 0'\_ o :Eo~ Z <'" ~~ -~ -~ I <"'~"" NN ~ U HaH < \D tI) Lt') \D tI) MO'\ ~ - ..:;:Uc:::. = Ll') It') I 0 Lt') I o~ ~ Htf)~tf) U _I C7'I tf) co m- tI) ~M. ~ ¡;jo"'> ¡;¡ ~ <3> ~ 0 uu ua au ~ <3> ~ 0 u< ~ œ E-tH~Lt') ~ ..- H ..- H ..... _ r-I ø::[-oIc.l4O'1 z: ~ <z-'" H <~ q '" ¡.¡- E-4~:t ~ .....·0 \D\D 0'\0 1t1'<::1" -'0 oq<N " :E"¡'¡ .. :O:,,¡.¡ E-t~ ~ ~>~ ...0_ MQ"o aU") ~>~ NM \Dtf) ~ <~ -- ..- -- <~ NM C7'I ~ Lt') tI) Lt') tf) 0'1 ~ I I Lt') ..- ~ tf) tf) '<::I" 0 Uo UC CU '<::I" 0 U< ~ H H ~ .. N '" '" E-< ~ Z ¡.¡ :E N " ø:: mm ~ro moo ø:: moo moo ~ H W~ ~~ ~~ H ~~ ~~ tf) a a ¡.¡ - " ::1 ~ - -to::C s.. H H.... OJ'" u 5 H H tD r-I Q) C::::z:: - - 0 Hr-IO ~ U~ ~ H 0 H \D "'0:> 00> _~ E-t t... E-t H!::N H t::"Q" tI]-ri..- E-4 U) "' z 8- 8-0 H~M H3-... ......~... [-01-0 co .ev H Zoo-=: to - tØo U..¡.J.,.... 2:tl:JlCC ......"Öu 'tjr-lt) ~ WE-t tI)~~ OO~M -OOM ~8 U~Z ~oz ~ ~ ¿H~ OO~N OO~ ~ ¿H~ -x < _ ø~O\ ~o roo....... .~......... ø::E:O"\......... >,1....... H :E: þ: H- ~ 0....... ~ 0 ., t: ~ H- . I Q) 0:: c tI)..:I t,)~ t,)~v CJ)t-I..:- tI)...:I +Jpq ~cv ~- 8 - 0 - 0 0 ~ ~oo MOOO ~ œ E-4·0 100::1'" 1\.0 ,. ICO ~·O..¡JCX) røoco ~ ,.. ~ø~ 0 m ~ N ~~< =~_ >~M < ~ ~~ .>,... .>.... a>.... 1Z.:I~.....t........t... en o::~~ ~m~ "ro~ oro~ o::~~ .,~~ ~Q)N ..:I ~ E-4-m CJ)~N ~~N ~~M E-4-~ W~~ rø~N < c tI) - n:I tI) -", .u 8:) ~ = Ø4 ~ 0 0 '-'- E-< _ - -. - - .-"- ¡q /t,/ - From the information shown in Table 6 it can be seen that the arterial interchange segments studied along I-805 are functioning at better overall Levels of Service than segments along I-5. Along I-805, each segment studied is operating at LOS C or better except for the eastbound direction of East.H st. at I-805 which operates at LOS D from 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM in the evening. Along I-5, all segments studied are operating at LOS C or better except for the following segments which operate at LOS D: Mid-day Period H st. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM WE* H St. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) 12:30 - 1:30 PM WE* PM Period E st. (Bay - Woodlawn) 4 - 5 PM WB * * H st. (Bay - Woodlawn) 4 - 5 PM WB & 5 - 6 PM WE Palomar st. (Bay - Industrial) 4 - 5 PM EB* & 5 - 6 PM EB * Òperating in the lower 1/2 of LOS D It should be noted that two of the arterial interchange segments (marked above with an asterisk) are functioning in the lower 1/2 of -~ the LOS D range of average travel speeds during the mid-day and/or evening peak periods. Further analysis. of these two segments (Appendix 7) indicates that the first segment, westbound H st. at I-5, is functioning at the lower limit of LOS D (within 1 MPH of LOS E) from 12:30 PM to 1 :30 PM in the afternoon and at LOS E (0.2 MPH below LOS D) from 5:00 PM to 5:30 PM. This LOS E condition (8.8 MPH) is not considered significant, however, because_ the average travel time across this short (883') segment at this level of service is only 68.1 seconds. . The second segment, eastbound Palomar st. at I-5, is functioning at 9.4 MPH from 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM and at 10;2 MPH from 4:30 PM to ·5: 00 PM. . This represents a change from 1995 when the average travel speeds during these periods where 11.6 MPH (4:00 - 4:30 PM) and 9.4 MPH (4:30 - 5:00 PM) respectively. Delay for eastbound traffic along this segment occurs primarily at the I-5 southbound ramps with some additional delay also occurring at Industrial Blvd.. There is currently a CIP project planned which will provide topographic . mapping and traffic data to Caltrans for' the preparation of a project study report for· the I-5/palomar st. interchange. This project study report will identify the ultimate improvements for the interchange. '- 31 A ¡/,.:< ..__.~ ...... .,__.______M...__. - When evaluating Levels ·of Service" for·· arterial "interchange segments, the following factors must be considered: 1.. Most segments are short.with controlled intersections spaced from 130 I to 750' apart. This causes traffic delayed at freeway ramp intersections to back up along the length of the segment. 2. Segments along 1-5 have trolley crossings close to the northbound ramp intersections. Grade crossings for the trolley restrict the speed of vehicles as they cross the tracks. Also, due to the frequency of trolley operations, additional delay will be experienced by vehicles at the intersections of the arterial and the freeway ramps. 3. Traffic signals at freeway ramps are under the jurisdiction of Caltrans and, therefore, are· not part of Chula Vista's computer controlled signal system. Typically, Caltrans signals favor traffic on the ramps. This keeps traffic on the ramps from backing up onto the freeway but increases the delay to traffic on the street crossing the freeway. 4. The existence of a transit center or other major traffic generator at or near a freeway interchange will serve to increase the volume of traffic attracted to the interchange. An example of such a facility would be the transit center which is located on the north side of H st. at the 1-5 interchange_ As previously indicated, the City's Threshold Standards exclude segments at freeway ramps. Since higher volume levels and lower Levels of Service are typically anticipated. at freeway ramp intersections, LOS A through D operations are considered acceptable for arterial interchange segments while LOS E and F are considered a significant impact. Using these guidelines, the 1996 TMP Study indicates that all arterial interchange segments studied': are operating at acceptable Levels of Service except westbound H st. at 1-5 which functions at LOS E (0.2 MPH below LOS D) from 5:00 PM to 5:30 PM. This LOS E condition is not considered significant, however, because the average travel time across this short segment at this level of service is only 68.1 seconds. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The purpose of the 1996 TMP Study is to assess the LOS of arterial segments for compliance with the Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan. These Threshold Standards specify that LOS C or better, as measured· by observed average travel speed, shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments except that during 32 - - ..-- - ---.- .--- . - ~ ~~-- A It, '3 - peak hours LOS D can occur for no more than any two hours of the day; The 1996 Study-îndicates that all arterial segments studied during each time period operate at LOS C or better; therefore, the Threshold Standards have been met for the 1996 TMP. It should be noted, however, that the following segments were found to operate in the lower half of the LOS C range of average travel speeds: 1. Third Ave. (4th/C st. - H st.) operates in the lower half of the LOS C range of average travel speeds for 2 hours during the day in the northbound direction. Northbound speeds during these times range from 13.8 to 15.7 MPH which are below the mid-range speed of 16 MPH for a class III arterial segment. In the southbound direction, this segment operates in the lower half of LOS C for 1 hour during the day. Average (LOS C) speeds range from 14.6 to 15.1 MPH which are below the 16 MPH mid-level LOS C speed for this arterial classification. - 2. Otay Lakes Rd. (East H st. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) operates in the lower half of LOS C for 1 hour during the day in the northbound direction of travel. Speeds range from 18.7 to 20.3 MPH which are below the mid-range LOS C speed of 21 MPH for this class II arterial segment. . 3. Palomar St. (1-5 NB Ramps - Broàdway) operates in the lower half of LOS C for 1 hour in the eastbound direction and for - 3 hours in the westbound direction during the course of the day. Average travel speeds vary from 13.5 to 14.1 MPH eastbound and from 13.5 to 15.3 MPH westbound. These speeds are below the mid-range speed of 16 MPH for a Class III arterial. In addition to studying arterial segments, the 1996 TMP':also assessed the LOS of arterial interchange segments. Although the City's Threshold Standards exclude segments at freeway ramps, these' segments were studied to maintain current information for arterial interchange segments which were found to operate at LOS D by the 1995 TMP. Using existing guidelines which consider LOS A through D as acceptable for arterial interchange segments, all the segments studied during this year's TMP were found to operate at acceptable Levels of Service except for westbound H st. at 1-5. This segment functions at LOS E (0.2 MPH below LOS D) between 5 PM and 5:30 PM. This LOS E condition (8.8 MPH) is not considered significant, however, because the average travel time across this short (883') segment is only 68.1 seconds. 33 ,q./(,~ --_..._..~-_._---_._-_._-- ____ _ F:or1997, it is recommended thaLthe same methodology used for the - --.- . 1996 TMPbe used for the 1997 study. Using this methodology, the 1997 TMP would study the following segments: ---- arterial segments which were found by last year's study to be operating at LOS C or less, arterial interchange segments which were found by last year's study to be operating at LOS D or less, segments where traffic volumes have increased 10% or more (at any count station along the segment) since the segment was last , studied for a previous TMP report, segments where major street widening has occurred and/or where new traffic signals have been constructed which significantly affect the operational characteristics of the roadway, H st. lEast H st., from I-5 to Rutgers Ave., (to provide the most current information possible for this traffic corridor). It is also recommended that the arterial segment on Third Ave. from 4th Ave./e st. to H st. be revised. That portion of Third Ave. (from est. to E st.) which carries less than 10,000 vehicles per day would be removed as an arterial segment from the Traffic Monitoring Program. That part of Third Ave. (from E st. to G st.) which comprises the central downtown business district would be exempted from the Threshold Standards_and would also-be removed as an arterial segment from the TMP. Third Ave. from G st. to H st. -- would become part of the TMP segment currently studied between H st. and Naples st. and would continue to be studied as part of the Traffic Monitoring Program. Conducting the 1997 TMP in this way will minimize the extensive field work required for the program while still providing the information necessary to monitor changing traffic conditions in the field. (M:\HOME\ENGINEER\TRAFFIC\96TMPFR.SM) File: 073S-10-TF236 34 ~ . -~.. --..- --- __ _u -- .-- ___ _n. __ ~ IllS- . . --- - _u "-. --.--... "-- - --. -- .-.- _ _ _..u_ ---- - -....-- . - - - -~ .- -- -- - - ... - ..- -.- APPENDICES 1 Chula Vista Growth Management Plan Revised Traffic Element (May 1991) 2 Arterial Level of Service 3 Arterial Segment Classifications 4 Summary of Previous TMP Study Results -- 5 1996 TMP Arterial Segment LOS (All Time Periods) 6 1996 TMP Arterial Segments Operating at ~ Mid LOS C 7 1996 TMP Arterial Interchange Segments - Operating at ~ Mid LOS D .'-" 35 ,.q I ¿,¿, ....",_h___ _,_...~.____.~_"_.__._._.___ .---." ._,. -..-. APPENDIX 1 ------ -- - CITY OF CHULA- -VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN_- - .- ---.. ~ _ -... REVISED TRAFFIC ELEMENT - MAY 1991 . GOALS * To provide and maintain a safe and efficient street system within the City of Chula vista. . * To establish a performance measurement methodology enabling the City to accurat~ly determine existing Levels of Service for motorists. * To define a Level of Service (LOS) value that represents a high quality of traffic· flow under constrained. operating , conditions during peak periods of traffic activity. * To establish a performance standard which is consistent with the Regional Growth Management Standards. * To maintain consistency in terms of LOS ratings with the previous Intersection Capacity utilization (ICU) methodology. OBJECTIVES 1. Ensure timely provision of adequate local circulation system capacity in response to planned growth, maintaining acceptable Levels of Service. 2. Plan new roadway segments and signalized intersections to maintain acceptable standards at build-out of the General Plan Circulation Element. THRESHOLD STANDARDS * City-wide: Maintain LOS "c" or better as measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial segments except that during peak hours LOS "D" can occur for no more than any two hours of the day. * West of I-805: Those signalized arterial segments which do not meet the standard above, may continue to· operate at their current (Year 1991) LOS, but shall not worsen. Notes to Standards * Arterial ·segment LOS measurements shall be for the average weekday peak hours, excluding seasonal and special circumstance variations. -- ------ - --- 19 It, 7 -..- suburban * Urban and arterials are defined as surface - highways having signal spacing of less than two miles .- ..-.. with average weekday traffic volumes greater than 10,000 - . -- - -. . vehicles per day. * Arterial segments are stratified into the following three classifications as shown on the attached graphic: Class I arterials are roadways where free flow traffic speeds range between 35 mph and 45 mph and the number of signalized intersections per mile are less than four. There is no pa~king and there is generally no access to abutting property. Class II arterials are roadways where free flow traffic speeds range between 30 mph and 35 mph,. the number of signalized intersections per mile range between four and eight, there is some parking and access to abutting properties is limited. Class III arterials are roadways where free flow traffic speeds range between 25 mph and 35 mph and the number of signalized intersections per mile are closely spaced. - There is substantial parking and access to abutting property is unrestricted. * The LOS measurements of arterial segments at freeway ramps shall be a growth management consideration in situations where proposed developments have a significant impact at interchanges. Ie v * Circulation improvements should be implemented prior to anticipated deterioration of LOS . below established standards. * The criteria for calculating arterial LOS and ·defining arterial lengths and classifications shall follow the procedures detailed'in Chapter 11 of the 1985 Hi¢1way Capacity Manual (HCM) and shall be confirmed by the City Traffic Engineer. * During the conduct of future Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) traffic field surveys, intersections experiencing significant delays will be identified. The information generated by the field surveys will be used to determine possible signal timing changes, geometric and/or traffic operational improvements for the purpose of . reducing intersection delay. 1-2 '- ---- ,4 /~tf ---_..._._,~_..,._".. ---.. --- --. --.- ~ - - * Level of Service values_ for arterial segments-shall be - -- . ~ based on the following table: LOS Averaqe Travel Speed (MPH) Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 A 2.35 2.30 2.25 B 2.28 2.24 2.19 C 2.22 2.18 2.13 D 2.17 2.14 2. 9 E 2.13 2.10 2. 7 F < 13 < 10 < 7 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985. Implementation Measures * Should the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) - determine that the Threshold Standard is not being satisfied, then the City Council shall, within 60 days of the GMOC's report, schedule and hold a public hearing for the purpose of adopting a moratorium on the acceptance of new tentative map applications based on all of the following criteria: - 1. That the moratorium is limited to an area wherein a causal relationship to the problem has been established; and, 2. That the moratorium provides a mitigation measure to a specifically identified impact. 1-3 - /I //, ? u ~ riTJS "-,. CI . Ie · - r g, -- " . . · ,,- - - -- ... · . . .. · .. t . --- n.. nr - <., · - - - . - " ----U.. · - . IÞ . . . ... ~.. - ...... i - ...c-. -----~I: I.IJ : (, (, (, ~ < 0 · I.IJ L> pI ~ . - : I · Pi - " · . : I - " HI < c: , c - C. ! . c . .. ~ c: 01 C 0 E ~ . C C. ' 01 . COO' c: C f CI - ~ ~ ~ ( 0 .::. .. . .. - ~ c: I >- ( < 0 0 I - ~ ~ 0 t l C \ I ~- U C - ~ .. ~ 't . ~ - C I > ~ I I- .: i i c ~ - N ( · ~ = I · · .::. = . · U ... ( · · · ~ :: ~ .. , ~ o c _ .. .. · t >. )-. - .. ~ - U . . .0' ~ ,,."tt. . ,,~~' \ .¡ot ...,ÞÞ' . .¡ot ~~ ~...¡ot ....~- . . -. .... .¡ot .' ..:........:... ,';\ ~ ...... ,~... ~ .:I"L"'< .... . . .... ". 2.'. ...0 . ..... -.. . ... ". :..... .."\ i -- ~ .0- ..... ~ ... 0° ~.. . ø 0° ~..¡. - ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . \" ,...,.. t/I ' . .... "'''' ~ .... "-:'.: .. _ 0 /I-/7ð ...... ---- - ,---_._- -. - .--- -.----...------..- ____.0" APPENDIX 2 - . .. ARTERIAL LEVEL OF· SERVICE .. The 1996 .. evaluates arterial LOS defined in the Highway TMP as Capacity Manual (HCM) . The 1985 HCM uses arterial LOS, based on the average travel speed of through-vehicles on the segment, as the basic measure of effectiveness used to describe the operating performance of arterial segments. Average travel speed is calculated from the running time on the arterial segment and the intersection approach de~ay. On any given segment, factors such as arterial classification, side friction (due to parking and driveways), signal density (the number of signals per mile), signal timing and progression, and traffic flow can substantially affect arterial LOS_ The HCM classifies arterial Level of Service into six categories, LOS A through F, with LOS A being the best quality of service and LOS F the poorest. These arterial LOS definitions have been incorporated into the Revised Traffic Element of the Growth Management Plan (Appendix 1). It should be noted, however, that the LOS definitions shown in the Traffic Element vary wi th the - classification of the arterial. The lesser the arterial classification (Le. , the higher the class number) the lower the speed associated with that LOS. Therefore, a Class III arterial provides LOS C at a lower average travel speed than does a Class I arterial. In order-tb-·evaluate Level of Service"for any arter£al segment, the classification of . that segment must first be determined. These arterial classifications are functional in nature and, as defined in the Revised Traffic Element, are summarized in the following Table: Table 2-1 ARTERIAL SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION FACTORS Class I Class II Class III Free Flow Traffic 45 - 35 35 - 30 35 - 25 Speeds Number of Signals < 4 4 - 8 Closely per Mile Spaced Availabili ty of None Some Substantial Parking Access to Abutting Generally Lfmited Unrestricted Properties None 2-1 - ..-. -. ---- ,l!/17/ - . -- -. - - . APPENDIX 3 .. ARTERIAL SEGMENT CLASSIFICATIONS ~ - . .-- - . -- During the 1992 TMP, the arterial network in the City was determined. Thirty-seven (37) arterial segments and eleven (11) arterial interchange segments were designated for study. Each segment was assigned an arterial classification based on the free flow speed of the segment, the number of signals per mile, the availability of parking· and the degree of access available to properties abutting the roadway. These arterial classifications (Classes I, II and III) are defined in Appendix 1 and are summarized in Table 2-1 of Appendix 2. In 1995, the arterial classification of otay Lakes Road from East H St. to Telegraph Canyon Rd. was re-evaluated. Based on the existing characteristics of the roadway, the classification of this segment was changed from a Class I to a Class II arterial. Of the 37 arterial segments currently defined, 25 are designated Class III, 6 are Class II and 6 are Class I. As part of this year's TMP, -- the classification of the arterial interchange segment on otay Valley Rd. at I-80S was reevaluated subsequent to the signalization of the northbound and southbound I-80S ramps. Based on the characteristics of the roadway, the classification of this segment was changed from a Class I to a Class II arterial interchange segment. Of the 11 arterial interchange segments, 8 are designated Class III; 2 are Class II and 1 is Class I_ These arterial network -- and segment classifications have been used for the 1996 TMP study. As currently designated, all of the Class III arterials are located west of I-80S. This lower classification is due to the constrained operating conditions of the street system and the nature of existing development in this area. The only exception to this occurs on Main Street between Third Ave. and I-80S where there are fewer signals per mile, more limited access, less parking, _ and higher free flow speeds than are typical of other arterial segments in the central part of the City. In the areas east of I-80S, where traffic conditions are less restricted, the arterial segments are classified Class I and Class.II. -- 3-1 ;tJ/7dl m...~*'.___ .~. _..___._n__ - APPENDIX 4 -... -<-. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS TMP STUDY RESULTS The following table presents the results of previous TMP studies in terms of arterial LOS and average travel speed for each arterial segment and arterial interchange segment in the City. Superscript notations within the table (on columns and on individual values) indicate the year the data was collected. - _.~ . - - 4-1 -- "-- - - - - - -- --- /1-/7.3 .-. - N 01 ~~ 8:<:(.4 ..,.0 -.-. H~~' . 0: ..,,,,, ",,,, "' ~~ Pol I tI) MM .,., OU" NJI") ...-......OO'\\.Dc::J ......OCD<q'U" N :>:" 0 uu~~~~ . . . "'''''"" O___N_ OqoLfl\D_", NN-N NNNNNN ""'MNNMM NO :>: 0 ~'" 0'" Oø.¡'¡ . .¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ ..;¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡..;..; H ¡,¡ r-.... c a:.,.,Po ~ -~ ~ "' '" 0 ~ I [/)1 '" :>: 0 UU '" ø.....'"" '" ~ 0 "'~ ~ ~ MO ...." M'" ... u¡'¡ . . ><~¡,¡ "'''' OCD ..; ø. ~~ N_ O,,,, '0 OM[/)f O"IOO::::<NM oo;2'N\DO'I OU"')qo....Ll10 c H ..0 UU ¡¡¡U . . . . . . . . ~ r:¡ :>:N,"" 00__ M\O\DN t"'---COIf"INC7\ ~ U ~ NNNN NNNN M-a'NNMM 0 H ... '" > '" ~ 0 "'''' "'~ r:¡ MO "M 00 u¡ <o;r ut:; .¡¡¡¡¡¡",¡¡¡ .¡¡¡..;..;¡¡¡ ..;..;¡¡¡¡¡¡..;..; ... )-fNt::I "'''' 00 -- "'-ø. -~ NN ¡,.¡" 0,,,, Ou¡ '0 Q Ot"')[/) ...:¡O ~...O uu ¡¡¡¡¡¡ r:¡H -'"" ,... ~ I >0::: ~ "<!' r:¡r:¡ ~ ...:¡a. c N ° Q) M I ...; ;.; ~ CO") C '" . "<!' .Q Z u...g:>:", ",0 _ø \ r: ~ H H<~ , .~ E-< (!) E-< ¡;¡ '" g; .. M> r:¡ ...:¡ ø. , "'I ...... ø -t"'--O\DN\.D \Dr--ONMD O'\MOOMa CO u¡ ~ :>: 0 . . · . · . . . . . c ~ <0,"" mO~NDN If''I..-DMf'''-qo -Mr---t'--1J10 ø ~ '" ......NNNNN NNNNNN oq<qoNNM<o::' > C ~ H 0 0 , ~ O:>:¡'¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ "'¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡..;¡¡¡ ..;"'¡¡¡¡¡¡..;..; 0 o.c r:¡ H<:t::I -:iN E-< 0: ø. ~ ",CD'" °ø ø. N~ , "'I ",0 :>: 0 "'0 <"'"" -c E , N- ~I 8 CJCJCJCJDJCJ CJ IU:IJ OJ W DJ CJCJtQlIICJCJ ~ Ztf.l:ZUJZ[/) ZtlJZtI)ZtI) "''''"''''"'''' ~ c . ø .... ø . ~ · · ",~..:¡ Q)~ . - .... H .... .... ·u > ° o~ H '" H .... '" '" :.'" > <'" i!!~ H H '" oo:u 0: 0 H - " ..:¡ " t: ..... ..... N] Q) U " ::: Q) "M ..... >..., ro>. .,,~ " .... ..... > " ..... ro -.....µ U] ".... ø ø II) '" Do U ro Do :>: "'t:ro~....t: i!.~ ro ro ..... , ro , ::>¡'¡Ht:::> o ø u ..... ::: z u z '" 0 HQ)O :J: U '" - " I 0: IU UU "-0 E-< - Do '" >:ø Z , , , . e I " ro - (1)1 - ","[ ¡,¡ , Q) 0: · .... ....H . ro H N.... C :>: Q) . .... > .... OM OM .µ......~H o ø t!> ~ .... '" '" ¡¡¡ '" c:: t:,,"'UU ø "' '" ¡,¡ 0 CD] ->m ." ø ,- '" " .<:: " ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ro:. u" -CO 't . U . Q) .... .... · Q) ""'0 ro gE " --.. .... ..... ~ '" .... ..... roU..... ......... -.'" OM .<:: '" Do I '" Do N-..... "U .<:: .... ro 0 0: ro ..... ..... ro- E-< .... ::: z r.. '" ::: z ø. '" ¡,¡ -. "- ¡r; /7,¥ ~-------- -----~-- -.-..-.--....- -,.-..-. - - - N 0 "' "' LnI,l')U")V'I O:.:W ........ 0'1 ~ a\\D OQ.¡(:.1 O"oCJ ['CDOM H '" C::<D'" -- --NN W .,..,. ~ I tI) 1lìC)\DNNO"I <DO"o IOCJ :0:: 0 . . . o¡ U . . . . ·UUo¡o¡ ",,,,..:I NO'I<O::<_O\O\ .... 10 N- N-NN__ NN NN N 0 Lnl/')U"IU'I O:>:W NON~ O",W aJa:l:a:l:tQa:I:¡:Q "' "' o¡< o¡o¡ . . H '" r-_ \Or-NM f5U1t1) --N'N CJCJ Pc 1 Cf.II -- :>: 0 UUo¡o¡ "'''''..:1 UU 0 "' "' "'''' LnI.nU"lU"l MO 00"0 , ~ ..~ · r- .... MI"'"I-O ><-W _0 . . < '" NN 0"00"0 r---OM...... 0,,,, -- -NNN '0 QMtI] q'\DOCD CJ"" "'- H ..0 OJ o¡ . . . . o¡o¡ . . UOJo¡o¡ :>:N..:I omr---o ....'" -N - N--N NN NN tIJ 0 ~ 0 "'''' "'''' I.t)InU")Ll'I MO "'- -N COIJ"'I..-"I:I" ""' od'" ..r:::J · · CD III () a:I: . OJ < o¡o¡ · . )-INr:::J -- 0"00 f't"'-U"'IM -- Z <-'" NN _N --NN ~ t:J« 0,,,, · . ::E:tIJ '0 +' JJ l?Q CI M WI · ~..O o¡o¡ roo¡ UU<o¡ 0 ¡:: f=10 -..:I "' 0 tIJH - '" U e:: '" ~ ~f=1 o<::¡\¡ M .... H "' I I e::~ M 1l')U"ILt)U') ,; o 0 qo.........,.tn '<I' f=1 O:>:W . . · œ "",H H<W r-Or"'-oe:r' , Q) ~""' c:: '" -NNN · ,...¡ W: 0'1[1) > ..Q ~ Pc I tIJ ~od'"od'"q-od'"'<õf" ....'" œ qo---Nr--- 1lì..-'o;:t...... co rt ~~ ~CJS · · . . . 0 . . ....- Uo¡<o¡ · · c Eo< r--_\DLn__ ON\Dl' NN +' 0 E-< NNNNNN NNNN · > o. L~ M 1.t)1l')Lt')1/') ... C 0 0 U")Mr---qo "', C"\ O:>:W <o¡«o¡o¡ o¡o¡« o¡o¡ . . · "'0 -.<: C"\ H<W 0'\0\0\0 0::. '" -NNN N .... WCJ'" ... œ '" c ''''/ · :>: 0 o¡o¡« ~ <r-..:I c E ~ ~I 8 o¡o¡o¡o¡o¡o¡ o¡o¡o¡OJ o¡OJ OOlXlaJeJ · ~ z"'z"'z'" w~w~ ¡.¡~ ¡.¡~¡.¡~ +'+' - · H o c œ c: . H II] ~ ~ OJ " H C. OJ ..-< 0 OJ e "'+' > t:> II] > 0:: -1: - ..:I < C. II] < M] H U 111 0 111 o¡ H > .'0 ..., ..., ..-< '0 '" C H ..., ..., U - " -.-< - ..-< U " œ +' '" '" H 0.-< c: H ..-< ~ .... '" c II] H .c: 0 H -.-< .c: 0 0 II] = ..:I '" H E-< o¡ H = , E-< co u 111 .... H · E-< ..-< II] , I II] '" I 0 Z U I I I II] II] II] I II] I .. W ~ 111 C. . 111 - C. · +' - · c :>: ..-< e OJ ..-< e OJ +'œ t:> >. U 0:: > U >. . 0:: > · W 111 ~ < ~ 111 r.¡ < 00 '" :J o¡ :J ...... o¡ NO. '0 · . . Z '0 . '0 , Z '0 '" c 111 ..., ..., ..., .... " .... 111 .... " "'~ _U) 0 '" '" '" '" '" .... '" 0 '" '" .... " , .c: " , ~ o¡ U = ..:I r.¡ H E-< ~ o¡ - H ~ N* - n _ u___ . --- -- ------- ..- A/7tr - N 0 U")1l'}U")1,I") 1f)0rI 0Z~ _M~~ ~~ O~~ . H ~ N~M- O~ ~~~ MMNN N_ ,.¡ ~Iml ~O-O ~N 00 ON :E 0 tIlCJUU . .. tIUII: . . ~~~ NN~_ MM NN ~M NNNN NN NN NN N CI Lf) If) II) U'I Q~t:..1 N\DO_ O~t:..1 .... CJCJØUII: øun ,IHXI: "')¡,n<~ H ~ __~N ~_ ~ ø::1ntJ) MMNN . . IG r4 0\ CD 0 ~Im¡ __ ~ ~~q CJCJCJU ~ P. ~ rou ..... ~ o MCI U')U')U')I/') 1l)U') ~ uti:! ~-LnCD MO\ )of ~ .. . . <-~ ~MOO\ 0_ CltJ) MMN_ NN '0 QMm \DLnO\~ 0\1..0 CD_ ~N Hue -=::CJUU .... .. . CJCC...5 ~N~ __NM O~ NM Ln~ m ..- NNNN NN NN NN 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0 U")1t)U"I1.l'I LnU"l MC CD~~m \DC) 8 o::r ut:..1 .. CJCIlCJtQ CJCJ cca:¡ .,c;:.r::::: v >tN~ ~-N_ 0\0 - Z ~-~ Mt"iNN _N - t:JiC ¡..,¡ ItfJ . :.t tr.I J 0 JJ "Q SMm¡ c: r:¡ 0 :>: 000 I! t:! UU I! I! o ~ H -0-1 U t::: ~ ~ H r:¡ ~ <~ £ ~ ~ H I I c:: ~ ('1"),..., U"II.t')U")U") ~. "d' t., 0..... IJ")-O\q< en 11'I ~..:..: o:E~ ... ......aI \ 8H ._p:;::t:..1 \DQJMM ;: '- a> rv. E-I c:: ø,¡ MMNN lIS ,...¡ ~ riJO''dJ) M> ..a ,c;; J..J ~ I tfJ -:~~~ ~~ ~~ ~0r-:U") ~ ~ ~~ :E 01 --UU MMq<N ~~ IJ")1J1 NIJ")IJ")~ IG 8 :£ øe::: <CO~ ........ NNNN NN NN NNNN ; 8 ~ U') Me 0 6~~~ 5 cr\ o:>:,.¡ . . . . 1! 1! t:! I! I! I! <::<:: I! <::<::.<:: ø..2 ~ H~t:..1 IJ")IJ")NM ~ ,... c:: III MMNN ¿gN ~C)tJ) œ ~ '" '" . Im m~ :E 0 «uu ~~ <~~ E ~ "'- 8 ~I CJCJCJCJ CJCJCJCJ - CJIX!. CJIX!. CJCJIXI,CJ ~ H ~~t:..1~ ZtnZtn H Zoo t:..1~ t:..1~t:..1~ ~ c. ~ t: . (!I . _ $ .µ> - tI] ~ IV~ :.. c:: <:: '"' (!I '" (!I > 'Ö .; ~ ~ H > rø > -== 0:: goO tI] H ..::::.-( -=: N~ . " U 'Ö. ~ .-( ~ 00 IV - ~ ~ ~ I'" .-( t:TI 0tl) . t:TI _ ~ _ M >. $ o ~- ro ~ ~ H M HUe U-::IH r-I tI) to 't:S.µ H H I Ul3 HO::H u ~ > tIJ H I H·. :J: ~ - ~ 0 M r-I r-I ~Ift E-c t!J tt.I I 00 ¡:Q c: U} tt.I U} en Q) x: ~ Z tI1~ tI1. "'f"i tI1 0.. tl) E-t I.l) I- ~ . lØ ~ lØ '-4 I 01 M ro ro e cø r-I N ~ ~ ...¡J 1 r-I ~,...¡ Q res::t,...¡ m ,...¡ cø I 1ft ¡ " tI U U .,. U a: U·.... ~ ~ ØJ-·- ~ '-4 I - _ ~ Q) -g,! tIJ = Z r-I 0 ~ ~ ~ > ~D o ...,. ",. . Z . '" <:: g c .¡J ~ U M ~.µ ~.µ.¡J 'µ::I _~ tl) 0 M tfJ-tIJ ~ tIJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ttI '" "'.,. c:: I c:: " '- ~ H tIJ = ~ ~ H ~ ~ H ~ H M ~* ,e:) /7t, -_...,--_..._.~" .~_.._--_._------,. N 0 ~ ~ - 0:>:", "'''' 0",,,, ___. - - --0 -- on H '" "'''' c: """ ~'" W Po. I tf) NNCON -.::<r--O"IO'I e", ....'" co'" :>: 0 . . ";~Qu~cD . "'''',..:¡ N\.?aJ_ r---\D co \0 MM ~ NNMM NNNN MM ....M ........ C 0 'ö ~o "'", .. 0 ~~ è o",w "''';';:''; ..;.;:..;..; "'''' . ...;..; ..;..; .. H W "'ID M f5LO~ ~'" C 8 Ilt 1[1)1 ." :>: 0 ou ~ Po........ e 0 .. œ 0 "'''' , MO ....co ." V 00'" . . ~ ><-W MID ~ .;: '" NN .. ~ 0,,,, ." , '0 OMtn NMO_ "'::I"'t"-N\D "'CO ....M 0 z H "0 . . . . . . . . u u . , , :>:"'.... ONM_ 1('JNO~ 00 "'N ~ NNMM NNMN MM ....... I tJJ 0 ... 0 "'''' MO ....- E-< v ..~ "''''';:';: .;:"'..;.;: "'''' . ..;:.;: , , ><NW M.... Z ';:~Po N'" - ~ ¡,¡.. 0,,,, ~tJJ 'e œ OMcnl .. "'-' ~Q œ H..O UU 0 C ¡,¡O :>:~,..:¡ ~ 0 tJJH '" U t:>: '" ~ ~~ 111 ... H '" I I t:>:~ M ~ '" .;, ~ gd1 .M'" "'" t:J œ "<H I-I<~ ~.... , aJ - E-< c: Po "'''' ';j ,...¡ ~... ¡'¡"'''' > ..0 Po , "'I MO\-Q --"'::1"'- M'" "'M œ . . . . . . C> 11 ~~. ~co3 NN\DQ CO<o:::'CDCO -OOO",=,,\O I , ~ ~ ~ E-< NNMM NNNN MM ~"'::I'" ..œ œ > ... O~ "'1 M ~'" V ~ 0 0 ID", :5:5 0\ o:>:¡,¡ "''''';:''; .;:"'.;:.;: "'''' . ..;:.;: , , _ .c C"I H';:¡'¡ OM N ... c: Po "'N ¡,¡CO", v œ Po 0- ~ I "'I ~ :>: 0 OU M -=:r--.... c E , ~I '8 II] C:U:a CJ "'''''''''' "'''''''''''''''' "'''' 0 ¡,¡~¡,¡~ ¡,¡~¡,¡~ Z"'Z"'¡,¡~ , ¡,¡~ ~ . .... , ~ ) - o c . > OJ - >. H M* OJ '" < ... > H '" "'. > 0. 0 .;: .... ~ '" "'.. .;: E ) '" '" 'Ö Po '" .... -j¡ '" 0\ 0. ) '" c: '" U M"i 'Ö c: ã 0 '" '" ::: ) .... > ... .... 0 .... c: ~ U U ~ M '" ... .... ... U .... >. '" - œ .. -'" 0 """¡-n_ - '" U .... . c 'H - ·"'¡H Q)H '" . .J ¡,¡ B -HI.t1H =H~H ¡,¡ .... '" 'Ö ..-.iHOH ¡,¡ H H 'Ö OJ '" c: , M ¡.. '" CO "- I I c: I ¡.. ¡,¡ '" œ Z "'H'" . '" . '" , >. 0. ;: ¡,¡ ....'" '" ) _,¿JtI)$.( UJ '" . , 'Ö ) . E .. ~c :>: rotðlftl ~ Cf.IrtlOrt\ ) 'Ö c: .... c: ...œ " . ........ ..... .... .... ~ c: . .... ~ ¡,¡ .... ...U )U ... U o.U ~ .... ~ ~ '" oœ - '" u.1 +J->_ aJ rø-O- '" '" Z "'C> '" .;: 0\ E .... . .J U "'c c: :3 ã 0 .... >. .... ::: >. '" "'~ _U) .... 'Ö 'Ö .... .... '" c: .... '" O' '" c: ... ... '" ..... .... 0 OJ ..... CO X H M 0 Po ::: 0 '" ¡,¡ ¡.. 0 H "'. .-.. -- - ·._____d___ -.-- - -. ~/77 - N 0 "'''' 0>:", """ 0a.", H a. ..,.'" e>:",CI) -- '" P4 I tI) ..,.0 NNC'\C >: 0 UU · . · . a."'''':¡ NO t""")t--'<:1"1.D NN MN<q'<q' CO~C "'''' "'... 0",'" t.Ö~tIlCII <"'« H '" ¡;¡",~ -- t:1t I en :.: 0 UU "'...,..:¡ 0 "' "' M~ NM oo:t" ..~ · · ><-r.¡ r--a:> < a. -- 0, '0 Qt'ltl'1l "'0 co cn 0\- HuO UU · . · · :':N"':¡ N_ N\D'-DC"I - NN t""')Noqo..qo CI) 0 "' '" 0 MO NM ..¡ ~ ..tz: · .",,,, <"'« >tN~ "'''' -- ¡... <-a. -- Q,CI) Z '0 ~ ~ r.¡. Cr""')t1) .., . >:CI) ~ ..... t.?0 ~;.:3 UU '" C ",0 "' 0 Cl)H - en U ..¡gj ~ ~ <a. "' '" - H J I ¡;¡~ .., "' "' ,; ... ... Q Q - r- E-<H 0:':'" · · ø \~ G1 ~E-< H<~ _0 ~ .... [5cn~ NN ~ ~ ,..:¡ > ~~ a. 'CI) NO> COO'l-r--- ø E-< · · " ~a:>S ØJa:lMN M C) "'HO ~ E-< ~ c NN MN":I"'<q' .., ø It") ~ > "'~ 0\ .., "'''' .,.c 0\ Q Q r-_ en~ - O>:r.¡ · CJ '" <PJ",< eno _.c H"'r.¡· ON e>: a. NN N r.¡a:>CI) .,.ø '" 1..-~ 1<01 ~'. :.: ° CJPJ 0 <r--,..:¡ c E ~ 'õ .~ 0 to a:H:C tII tII C:UII CJ r-- ~ ~ fiI~fiI~ fiI~r.¡~ M ..,.., ~ · '" C 0 k 'Ö " "'0 ~ Q 0:; CI) en > H ... · !;; en.., -0 H '" k "' .., H '" Q " II> !ij " 'Ö 'Ö ..... .>: '"' 0 "' '" Po 0:; C '" t.? c "' 0 0 U ,..:¡ r.¡ 0 .., '" k ..... c:: .~ CI) C .... CJ .... 0 "tjH >,_ 0 U .... ... Q)H (ØH ~ 0 - I .... ~ >: ..... 0 E-o :: ",0", H . Z "' U '"' "' gj ì: fiI ..... Co I ""'" .., >: CI) ~ .<: ......... ..... ~ ~ c ..,ø t:> ... Co ",UkU ~ r.¡ ~ '" '" QI-.µ- "'ø '" '" k k C NO. a z '0 en {) U ~ enc 0 '" G1 II> en~ -'" .... '" 0 .... .... 'Ö E-o '" I k G1 '" II> ° '" H '" E-< :: >: E-< N. - A) 71' --.-- --- -.--. --.- N 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 0::c¡:¡:¡ t-<oc:' <DO "",) <DCD O",W···· . . - - -. · - -- - · .-- - -- - -- .--- . H tl4 -. CD<o::t "'~ oQ'oQ' -OoQ' a::\DtI) -- -~ -- -- "'- tl4 I tf.)1 NO ,.,'" :E 0 UU UO UU . . OU · "''''.... ,., r- N~ MM NM NO::CO ~ ~ ~'" "'''' "'''' <D<D "'0 '" '" '" .... o",W · · · · 0:1< · · ¡¡¡< H W <D~ M", MM 0'" ex:",ø. ~~ ~~ ~~ W tf.I P4 I tIJ :E 0 UO UO UU OU ø.oQ'.... 0 ., ., '" ., .,., "'''' ,.,0 NoQ' NN r- oQ' ,.,<D ~ utJ.: · · · · · ><~¡,¡ CD '" N~ CD<D MoQ' < ø. ~~ ~- ~- ~~ Cltf.I '0 CI t"") tf) ,., r- ~M Hua UU 00 UU UU . · :EN.... N<D NN ~ MM NM II) ~ 0 "'''' "'., "'''' "'''' ~ MO "'oQ' <DCD MoQ' <DCD ~ ..1£1 · · . · ¡¡¡< · · 0:1< tIJ ><N ¡,¡ CD'" oQ'N CD<D oQ'<D 0.. l? <~ø. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ - ~ r:¡ o ItJ) ';¡tIJ 10 ~ . tIJ ~ .:.J Q c f"'1 tn ~ ~~ ~..o UU UC UU UU Q C. r:¡ ~.... ., 0 r:¡p;: l? ~ '" U ~ '" ~ :Er:¡ l?", !I .... r:¡ - '" .... tIJ~ U I I p;: M "'''' "'''' "'''' "'''' .; .,. °:Eß NCD N<D r-~ <DCD ~ r:¡ · · · · · ø "'H ~ o<¡,¡ NCD <DM <D<D N'" ~ ~~ H ø. ';j Q) ~"'[JJ N- ~~ ~~ ~~ M H > ..0 ~., ,;¡ '" ,tf.I CD<D oQ'M ø · 0> rtI O\~ ~ ~CDS ¡¡¡U UU UU ~<D C¡¡¡ ~- ~ ø ~ ~ ,.,,., NM ~ ø 0\ H ø > .... p;: Q. . M "'''' "'''' '" ., "'''' .. ~ r:¡ 0 0 N '" <DO ON ....CD '" ~ ~ O:EW · · · ¡¡¡< · ¡¡¡< '" 0 --" ~ H<¡'¡ r- .... ....M ",r- "'CD ex: ø. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ N WCDtf.I .. ø '" ~ -- I tf.I . .- :E 0 UU UU ¡¡¡U UU ~ <r-.... c E ~ 0 ~I 0 ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ 0 ¡,¡¡¡: W¡¡: ¡,¡¡¡: Ztf.l ¡,¡¡¡: ¡,¡¡¡: ø > ~~ ~ Q C ø MØ -o-i o-i '" > e e e H'" '" "'~ 30 30 30 . H·... -.... -1: '" '" '" .¡.J H.... H.... ..,ãi o-i o-i o-i "';"tf.I .¡.J H.¡.J '" '" '" H "'''' H'" ~ -0 -0 -0 .... "';j ;j ø ~ HO HO HO "'''' "'''' "'''' C H¡¡: H¡¡: H¡¡: ",e o-ie '" e ø H H H "'0 UH "'H 0 I I ,- o-io-i ~ o-i ~ E-o '" '" '" U'" I UI _ø Z '" '" · '" -ø. - ì: ¡,¡ "'''' "'''' "'''' .¡.J'" ( ~ . C :E o-i;> o-i;> o-i;> .. I "';> 0> ~ . ~ Uo-i Uo-i Uo-i '" o-i .", ø ¡,¡ ~¡¡¡ ~¡¡¡ ~¡¡¡ ;> ....¡¡¡ .¡.J.¡.J Q. - '" o-i.¡.J '" "'C:: NO> .;>. .;>. .;>. ¡¡¡'" e;>. 0 '" C "'- .¡.J'" .¡.J'" .¡.J'" 0'" e.... _ U) tf.I¡¡¡ "'¡¡¡ "'¡¡¡ ;>.~ o-i¡¡¡ ....r.. '" '" '" ¡,¡ :I: ~ ¡¡¡ ø. :E NO ;4179 . .. ..--.,,-------..-----......"--- "--- -.....---.-.. -......--.. - N 01 ~ ~ 0:.:,., NO Op,.I:J . · · ~ .p,. "'~ 01"'''' _M t:::IoI I tn ...- "'111 Or- M'" ::E: 0 .... U<c . · . "'1110-1 -0 c:::>'" "'... 0.... NM N_ NN "'M ê 0 N 0 "' "' +' "'N 0 O:>:¡,:¡ è ~ Cq~~ o:¡<c · · <co:¡ <co:¡ <co:¡ NM +' ~ "111'" NM c ¡,:¡ '" 8 P4 tI) :>: ° U<C "C ~ "'....0-1 e j 0 "'"' "'"' œ ~ MO M~ o~ "C ~ ..~ · · . ~ ><-¡,:¡ 1110 N'" ~ <c '" NM N_ +' 0,,,, ~ '0 "C CM[f.) oeo "'... ,g HuO . o:¡<c o:¡u . · I , ::E:No-1 -1l1 r-1I1 ~ NN NN , tIJ Eo< Z 0 "' "' "'"' ~ MO "'''' c:::>- o::t ..ti o:¡<c · .,;.,; , I tIJ >fNI::I "'N ~c:::> - 0" ~ <c_", NM N- ~ ¡,¡ o It!) , "'tIJ tIJ '0 ~ SMtI) +' "'"' "",0 ~ C . 0 ¡,¡ :& .. ° o:¡.,; o:¡u c 0 ZH ~ -0-1 "' ~,..., - 0> U ~ 0> :E[;1 - ~ !I ~p., co .-- r:¡ ü "' I I tlJr:¡ p:: M "' "' "< ' o:&ß N'" .;, "< ' p.,:E ¡,¡ o.,;¡,:¡ · œ :EH ~ H '" "'0 ~ Q) ¡..Eo< ~a'\Cf.} NM ~ ..; H > .Q L') ... ~ 1[1')1 111'" 0... N'" OC:::> œ . . . · . co r, C\~ ~ ~c:::>S ON O:¡<C N'" c:::>.... eor- ~ Eo< NN N_ NN MM ~ L +' œ '" H ~ > .-- p:: cø M "' "' "L ¡,¡ 0 0 M'" ~ O>~ Eo< O:&¡,:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ .,;o:¡ <c<c ~ 0>0 ~ Hø<µJ 1110 _.z:: " '" Nro") N ¡':¡C:::>t!) "œ '" .. L I "'I tIJ ø :& ° O:¡.,; ~ ~ <cr-0-1 c E ~ ~I " '8 ¡,:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ o:¡o:¡ tIJ ~ ~ ¡':¡3: ¡':¡3: ¡':¡3: ¡':¡3: 013: +'.. ¡,:¡ ~ ro - - - " cc œ .¡.J ro H H H ~ Mœ -.... .¡.J H H 0>, H<: -II} H H II} 0> +' HO H·... II} Ü -.8 HO:¡ H> II}.¡.J II} " ro" ~ M] II} II} II} Q) ....Q) II}ro II} <: "'Q) "''Ö U'Ö !;; L II} N II}Q) ...." ....<: -<: œ +' "'.... "''Ö UU U'" '" H c ....'" ....'Ö -Q) -Q) .Q) œ UI U·... .... .... 'Ö.... ~ 0 -<: -:I: ·ro Q)O "0 ~ 1-< Q) 'Ö:I: > H œ Z .... I a: ";1 >., ~ L ¡,:¡ ." I Q) +' :& 'Ö .¡.Jc. <: Q)Q) ....Q) ~ ø c +'œ " "ro tlJO >.<: ",II} ....., ~ ¡,:¡ .¡.J .¡.J uo <: 0 roO oœ tIJ ro·... =.... .,., ro" >" NO. .¡.J<: .... . U ".... .... ~ O>C .... 0 .¡.J.... Q)ro OQ) >.a> 0> ~ <:o:¡ II}:I: ....Z :& ro:& Eo< -'" 0 '" Q) .¡.J 0 ¡:¡ ¡,:¡ Eo< ¡,:¡ 0 . Eo< N* - ,4/J'¿) _m.,__"__ . ____.__._·.·~_u_,__ -.-....--- ---,--_._- _....,-- ,- __._. __·_~_·_u -- -.- ..-- - -- - - . - Table 4-2 summarizes the information presented in Table 4-1 showing ,- the number of_, arterial segmentsr-listed by-classification, which conförm to each Level of Service for each time period (AM, Mid-day and PM) studied in previous years. < Table 4-2 ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE ALL TIME PERIODS AM PERIOD Class LOS I II III TOTAL A 4 2 5 1 1 A/B* - 1 6 7 B 1 1 13 15 B/C* - - 1 1 C - 1 - 1 - C/D* 1 - - 0 D-F - - - 1 * Indicates segments operating at different LOS in different directions. Note: No data was collécted'on', Class I ., segment (Otay Valley Rd.) due to " - road construction. - MID-DAY PERIOD Class LOS I II III TOTAL A 3 2 2 7 A/B* 1 1 5 7 B 1 1 13 15 B/C* - - 3 3 C 1 1 2 4 D-F - - - 0 * Indicates segments operating at different LOS in different directions. Note: No data was collected on , Class I segment (Otay Valley Rd.) due to road construction. 4-9 A/ð/ · ~..- - - - - - .--- - .. _____. _ n .~_ ______ _..._---_..~--- -~ -- ~ --. - ...---. - Table 4~2 (Cont.) -- ... -. ---- ._u ._-. - - - ARTERIAL PERFORMÞ~CE ALL TIME PERIODS PM PERIOD Class LOS I II III TOTAL A 3 . 2 2 7 A/B* 1 1 3 5 B 2 1 15 18 B/C* - 1 2 3 C - - 3 3 C/D* 1 - - 1 D-F - - - 0 * Indicates segments operating at different LOS in different directions. - Table 4-3 suItUTlarizes the information presented in Table 4-1 for arterial interchange segments. These tables show the number of arterial interchange segments, listed by classification, which conform to each Level of Service for each time period. -_._-.- ---- \...... Table 4-3 ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENT PERFORMANCE ALL TIME PERIODS AM PERIOD) Class LOS I II III TOTAL A 1 - - 1 A/B* 1 1 2 4 B - - 2 2 B/C* - - 2 2 C - - 1 1 B/C/D** - - 1 1 E-F - - - 0 * Indicates segments operating at different LOS in different directions. ** Indicates segments operating at different LOS in different directions at different times. 4-10 '- ,4 /J';i .-~._.__.- -- - ~--- .~_._._-~-------,.-. - Table 4-3 (Cant. ) .. -- -- --- - ..o-- -- - -- .. -- --- -- . - -..- ..------ '0" . __ . _ _ ~ - - . - --- .- - -._- -.. -- ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENT PERFORMANCE ALL TIME PERIODS MID-DAY PERIOD Class LOS I II III TOTAL A - - 1 1 A/B* 1 1 2 4 B/C* - - 1 1 C - - 3 3 C/D* - - 1 1 E-F - - - 0 * Indicates segments operating at different LOS in different directions. - Note: No data was collected on 1 Class I segment (otay Valley Rd.) due to road construction. PM PERIOD Class LOS I II III TOTAL A/B* 2 - 4 6 A/C* - 1 - 1 C - - 1 1 C/D* - - 3 3 E-F' - - - 0 * Indicates segments operating at different LOS in different directions. - 4-11 -- . A/J'3 -. .- - - Table 4-1 indicates-that 17 arterial segments ope~ate at LOS C in- .'. - -- . atleast one-dirediõn. (3 duiii1g--thë~.M·r period,-'-7 - at Mid-day añd 7-- in the PM). There is also one segment that operates at LOS D in one direction during the AM and PM period. The following is a list of these segments: AM (LOS C) H st. (1-5 NB Ramps - Third Ave.) - EB E. H st. (SW College Ent. - Rutgers Ave.) - EB & WB Otay Lakes (E. H st. - Tel. Canyon Rd.) - SB MID-DAY (LOS C) Third Ave. (Fourth Ave./C st. - H st.) - NB & SB Fourth Ave. (SR-54 EB ramps - H st.) - SB Broadway (L Street - S. CVCL) -NB H st. (1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.) - EB & WE E. H St. (SW College Ent. - Rutgers Ave.) - EB & WE Otay Lakes (E. H st. - Tel. Canyon Rd.) - NB & SB Palomar st_ (I-5 NB ramps - Broadway) - EB & WE - - PM (LOS C) Third Ave. (Fourth Ave./C st. - H st.) - NB & SB E St. (1-5 NB ramps~:Third Ave.)- - EB & WE H st. (1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)- - EB & WE '- E. H st. (SW College Ent. - Rutgers Ave.) - EB & WB L st. (Industrial - Third Ave.) -WE Otay Lakes (E. H st. - Tel. Canyon Rd.) - SB Palomar st. (1-5 NB ramps - Broadway) - EB & WE PM (LOS D) otay Lakes (E. H st. - _Tel. Canyon Rd.) - NB (7 - 9 AM) otay Lakes (E. H st. - Tel. Canyon Rd.) - NB (4 - 6 PM) The Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify that LOS C or better (measured by average travel speed) shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments except that during peak hours LOS D can occur for no more than any two hours of the day. The results of previous year's studies indicate that all arterial segments have satisfied the City's Threshold Standards with one exception. Since the LOS D condition for the northbound direction of otay Lakes Rd. (between East H st. and Telegraph Canyon Rd.) '--- 4-12 ----- - - . ----- -_.- ------ --- - . .-- n/J>~ ------------. ___0____...-----"."------.--" - . - occurred for more than two hours out of the day, this segment-does -~~. --- ___ . not. IDe~t_:_the· City ',s Th:çe~Þold-S.t:?-l)dards::-£ora-class=I-a:rtéri-al:~:~-::-=::' n__ _ ._.u For northbound otay Lakes Rd., this LOS D conditión.is primarily due to congestion at Otay Lakes Rd. lEast H St. due to the high volume of left turning movements at the intersection. The City currently has a CIP project planned for the intersection of Otay Lakes Rd.1 East H st. which will add dual left turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic on Otay Lakes Rd. This project is currently under design_ The construction schedule for this project is on hold pending the undergrounding of utilities in this area. Once completed, this project will increase the capacity of the intersection and improve the operating LOS for Otay Lakes Road. It should be mentioned here, that the problem with the lower Level of Service on this - segment· of Otay Lakes Rd. is influenced by several factors. One factor is the length of the segment (3395').. The shorter the segment, the greater the impact delay at one or two intersections has on the overall segment LOS. A second factor is the presence of Southwestern College which ge~erates large amounts of traffic during short periods of time as students go to and from school for their classes. Another factor is the classification of -- the segment itself. Class + arterials are roadways where free flow traffic speeds range from 35 to 45 mph and the number of signalized intersections per mile are less than four. There is no parking and there is generally no access to abutting property. The segment of Otay Lakes Rd. from East H St. to Telegraph Canyon Rd. is classified as class I but there is access to abu~ting ~esidential and commercial properties on the east side of the street. There is also parking along part of the east side of this segment. The speed limit in this area is 40 mph which limits free flow traffic speed under all èxcept the lightest traffic conditions, and with the new signal at Otay Lakes Rd./Gotham st., this brings the number of signals per mile to four. These characteristics make this segment closer to a class II arterial than to a class I. -Class II arterials are roadways where free flow traffic speeds range from 30 to 35 mph, the number of signalized intersections per mile range - . between four and eight, there is some parking and access to abutting properties is limi ted. Because of the nature of this segment of Otay Lakes Rd., the City will, in the future, analyze this segment as a class II arterial rather than as a class I: When the road classification is taken into consideration, this segment. no longer operates at a Level of Service worse than LOS C. From Table 4-1 it can be seen that arterial interchange segments along I-80S function at better Levels of Service than segments along 1-5. It can also be seen that all segments operate at LOS C or better except for the following locations: 4-13 -- . rJ /JÞ,5 .' - ._- - - _ AM (LOS D)· __~ _._ "__ _.__u_p "- -- . -. -- - - -.-. - *---- .-. -- .-..--- -----_...- --- _.~._-_. -.----. --.-.-._._+--~ ---- -. --- .. - ~-PalÖmar - S C (äa~~Blv~. - Industrial) - EB (8 - 9 AM) MID-DAY (LOS D) H st. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) - EB (12:30 - 1:30 PM) HSt. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) - WE (11:30 AM - 1 :30 PM) PM (LOS D) E St. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) - WE (4 - 5 PM) H St. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) - WB (4 - 6 PM) Palomar St. (Bay Blvd. - Industrial) - EB (4 - 6 PM) Although the City's Threshold Standards exclude segments at freeway ramps, LOS measurements at interchanges are a growth management - consideration for projects which will have a significant impact at those interchanges. Due to the higher volumes and lower LOS's that typically occur at freeway ramp intersections, LOS A through D operations are considered acceptable for arterial interchange segments while LOS E and F are considered a significant impact. Using these guidelines, all of the arterial interchange segments studied operate at acceptable Levels of.Service. - - . -. -- -- . 4-14 - ;1IK¿, -- - ,.-.-.......- ...-..-...----------- - -. ~ -- ..--- _.- . - .__.·U . -------... ----. ----- .-_.. --. --- -- -- - ------- ~----_.- --- . - -.-- ------. -- --- ----- tI.! 0 ...:! .. - .¡J t: ~ IIJ U") -'" 0>0 Q).,..¡ Þ-: tI.! ¡..¡ or-; .-iCV '0 ItS'" C ""¡cv OJ ~ E ,.... C. .¡J',.. I C. ¡..¡8 Lt) ..:t: <.-i ",.-i - :,;:< 8 \D '" '" ,.... -:-"':"" . ..-- ----' /I/J»7 -.-- N 01 - Q:t:~ ~C, ~ __ -- - .--- ._-- --- -- .-0::- "'- _.- -. '.- -, --- ---. -.-_. ..- t.: ID<f.I ø.. I CI) "'''' MM ~ ~ "'''' 1t')N01t')NIt"I --OO\\DCD -O\D_Lt"IN :E: 0 . . . . . . "'''',.;¡ \Dt-NOO"oM O--_N_ Ooo::'t-M_C\ --NN_N NNNNNN '"I:t'MNNMM NO:E:° O",¡'¡ uummmlI! mmmmmm ...;mmu...;...; H ¡,¡ g¡",¡¡; ø. I tl)I :E: 0 "'...,.;¡ 0 "'''' "'0 co... ~ u~ . ><-¡,¡ "'ID ...; '" -- O'<f.I '0 O'I"IQ"'NM "'''' OMtI')l t-I.O"IQ"'N\DO\ OU")~_U")O l-(uO UU . . . . . . . . . . :E:N";¡ 00__ O'\OH'f")\D'-ON t--CD&ONo\ - MNNN --NNNN M~NMMM II) 0 ¡.:¡ 0 "'''' "'0 ...'" E-< ~ -.~ -ø:lCU:Qø:I ø:lg:; g:; «g:; 0::"'; o¡ m 0::"'; ><Nt.: "'... Z ...;-'" -- - r:¡« O'<f.I ~II) '0 "0 OMCI) r:¡O l-(uO UU 1t1 II)H :E:_,.;¡ - >: 0:: ~ 'M ~~ ... ~ " ro 0 c H '" , o::~ M Ir IV 8dJ .'" r:¡ ~'" c. g~ l___ C. E-<H H"';¡'¡ ~ ~~ .'" ~ .:: ~OHJ) >", ..:¡ '" I <f.I1 ~~ "'''' œ -t-O\DN\D MNONMO O'\MOOMO co ~~ ~coS . . . . . · . . . . . ~ O'IO~NON NNOMt-...,. -Mt-t-&OO ~ · E-< -NNNNN NNNNNN ""'~NNMoo::I" > ~ <::> M ~ 0 0 , 0\ O:E:t.: mmmmmm mmmm...;m ...;...;mm...;..: 0 .<:~~ 0\ H'::;r:.:¡ N...... ,.... c:: '" ~ ~ t.: CO<f.l .00 '" _-s..M~ , <f.I1 ".' 11I0'10'1 :E: 0 ~"'''' ..:....,.;¡ o~~ E , ~M'" ~, 8 g:; ¡:Q¡:Qg:;jD: g:;j D: IXIOOtI:llXltII tQtQtQtQtctQ ~ Z<f.lZ<f.lZ<f.l Z<f.IZ<f.IZ<f.I ¡'¡3:¡'¡3:¡'¡3: ... . 0 . .J . m . - · . <f.I-";¡ GJ- · ... - . .J H . . .J . .J ·u > .E~ H <f.I H . .J <f.I <f.I :''0 > ":'0 H H <f.I oc::u c:: 0 H ~ II) ,.;¡ II) C ... ... ã: N . ( ) U "' = GJ on ... >.. .J 10>. ~l "' . .J ... > "' ... 10 ..... .JII) I.<. .J II) <f.I 0. U ro 0. :E: ~c rtI-.¡.JC ro ro ... 1 ro ::I¡'¡HC::I · .. ... = Z U Z 'IiJ 0 H( )O U'" U <f.I ~ II) , 'U uu a f< ~ 0. '"' Z 1 , , e I ro ro 11)' - T", ¡,¡ . . ( ) c:: . . .J . .JH . ro H "'N :E: ( ) . . .J > . .J .... .... .. .Jr-i~H c: ~ ...... t:> ~ .µ <f.I ..: m <f.I C C",<f.IUU . ~ !.:I <f.I !.:I 0 0", ~>"' ..,,0 ~ , <f.I '0. "' .<: II) II! mro:. UII) "'~N U ( ) . .J ... · ( ) "'0 ro ~ gg: I.< ....... . .J ... ~ It") . .J ... rou... . .J", "'-~ .... .<: <f.I 0. I <f.I 0. N~'" "'U t: . .J ro 0 c:: 10 ... .... ro~ ... = Z 1>< <f.I = Z '" 3: ¡,¡ '~N - A/J'ð --'."-'.'- "._--_..._-.._~-_..,.,..._-- -- _n -- . N 01 -.--. - o :¿:'t:.J - -.. ~~~ ----, -- - -- -- - -- -- .". -- --~-- _". +__. - - n.· _n__ _ __._ __ -- -_. .-- --.-- - -- - -- -.-~- ... At I [1)1 .... - "'''' \01,£)..0\,0 U)Cj\ONNO"I 1"'101.0'" "'CD c::n... c:J..- :>: 0 . . . p,¡Lt')..:J NO\"'=t'_"'''' . COa)"'=t''-D N_ r--",~I..O N......NN__ --NN NN --NN ~:c c 0",'" I!:Itr ØJØJC:UII UU~oO: ~~ U~~oO: H '" f5Lt')~ At I tI) :>: 0 "'....,..:¡ 0 "'''' '" '" "'0 00> r-.... .. ..t:J . . ><-'" _0 "'''' 00: '" NN -- 0,,,, 10 !Þ\D\D\O OMen 'q"I.DOCX) CD.... It">_ r-I.DIX)QJ Hue P¡ P¡ . . . . .~~ . . . . . :>:N"':¡ OCt\r"-O ....It"> -N wr--C""'),"=" - N-_N NN NN --NN CI1 0 ...:¡ 0 '" '" '" '" "'0 It">_ -N E-< ~ ..µ:¡ . a::¡ aJ U rII '~00: ~~ UU~P¡ ><N'" -- 0>0 Z 00:_", NN -N -- ¡,¡., 0,,,, &CI1 '0 t?Q CI C"'1 UJ ¡,¡O ~ ·'0 ~'" ~~ Ll1 -,..:¡ CI1H - >: c::: ø .,.¡ ~æ ... ~ ... 't:I 0 H I c: C::¡,¡ M '" .1{ a> o 0 .'" ¡,¡& ø", 0. QZ ::; ~- 0. E-<H HoO:'" ';ã C:::E-< a: '" < <...:¡ µ:¡C"ItI) >", '" ''''/ voo:roo:rvvv I.D\OI.O\D ø ~---Nr- Lt')_qt.,.... ....'" r-CD__ '" "':;à ~CD3 . . '.' . . . . ø r----I.DLn__ ONI.Dt"'-- ....- CCO'l"ld"<w;:r< C ~ ø NNNNNN NNNN NN --NN > ~ \:) M C 0 0 ~ aI 0:>:'" .:::~.:::.:::~~ ~¡:¡.:::.::: ~~ U¡:¡P¡~ 0 -"øø aI H""", N...... ~ a: '" ø ø "'CD", øOO '" J,.-O:::-U"I , "'I "'",,,, :>: 0 ."'''' ~.-..... ""r-,..:¡ E ~ ÕVU"I ~I 0 ø:lWttltrllIltxl ~~¡:¡~ ¡:¡~ tQ aua en ~ Z[I)ZCJ:IZtI) "'3: ¡.¡ 3: ¡'¡3: "'3:"'3: , ... ~ H c C . H tIJ m . ( ... H . 0. > ( ..... 0 ( E ... > t:> tIJ > a: 11 ~ ,..:¡ .::: 0. tIJ "" "& H U '" 0 '" ~ H . > 'Ö ..... ..... ..... 'Ö '" c H ..... ..... u - ... .... - ..... u ... ø ... '" '" H -... C H ..... ~ .... It"> " III H .c 0 H -... .c 0 ø tIJ ::c ,..:¡ tI) H E-< ~ H ::c . E-< CD 0 '" ..... H ø E-< ..... III , I tIJ '" I ø Z U I 1 I tIJ tIJ III I III I c '" - '" 0. '" - 0. . ... - c ø ø :>: ..... E ( ..... E ( ø...... t:> >. u a: > u >. . a: > ø ø ¡.¡ '" ~ .:; ~ '" þ¡ "" ØOO ~ '" :t ~ :t ...... ~ "'NM 'Ö . . , z 'Ö . 'Ö Z 'Ö ""'''' '" ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... '" ..., ... ~"'''' "'~- 0 '" '" '" '" It"> .... '" 0 '" It"> .... ... I .c ... , ~ -- ¡:¡ u ::c ,..:¡ þ¡ H E-< r.. ~ - H ~ ONM - /1/ JÞ '1 ~~. ----- ~ ~ ~- ~- _n_ _ ____ _.._. .------- - .--.- -- N 01 - - -~-:l~ ~-~-:-.:--:- ~ -- -::~-::-- ~ =-~~ ~.~~~.: --- ~~ ~:~ -- .. ~ -- ---. -- -- "_n____. .-- -.- ~- - - _'0 .---- ---. t::¡1..D u) - p,. '-0<.01.:11.0 1.01.0 \0:11.0 «0«0 I~I OQ-N ~OQ~ ~~ 00 I'O"ION :.: 0 . . . . . . . . . . · . p,.~~ MMM_ NN~N ON NN CD_ tf" t"") Mr"'1NN NNNN NN NN -NNN NO~O O"'¡,¡ "''''UU .cn.cIIctlt:Q "'''' "'''' U"'<'" H ¡,¡ 0:",'" ¡,¡ '" ø.. 1 tl)1 :.: 0 ",..,...:¡ 0 "'''' MO M'" "" ..t:.: · >4_t::I 0_ < '" NN 0,,,, '0 ..0..0 <.OlD OM"'I O"Ic:)MCO \.O100'\~ "'''' CO~ r-N HuO . . . . . . . . . "'''' . :.:"'..:¡ t'N\DM --NM 0"" NM "'''' - Mt"')NN NNNN NN NN NN tIJ 0 .. ~ 0 "'''' MO "'CO :- o::t ..W <"''''U IHII c::I¡:Q "'Q "'''' · .« >fNt::I 0\0 :z; <-'" -N - t:JiC 0,,,, ~tIJ '0 ~O Cl"")tI)l t::IO ~..O "'''' J") tlJH ~..:¡ - ~ 0:: ~t::I ~ ~ ." ~~ ::.. ~ ~ .... 'Ö 00 ¡:: H "'«0 , o::~ .., J") Q) o 0 . 0> 0> t::I 00>0> P, 0:':'" ~........ P, ;:"¡H H.::t::I ~ ~E-< 0: '" ~ .~ <: <:,:¡ ¡,¡O\'" c:I\D\D1.O «0«0 "'''' >",,,, ~ I tl)1 oqoMU1CO -0-0'\ 00 N"" NOr-I.{') . . . . '.' · . . . co §:~ ;'icoS "::I"lf)~N MM_O ..,.'" "'''' N U'HfU'..... ~ I- MMNN NNNN NN NN NNNN . E-< > ~ 1.0 .., I- 0 0 5 C\ o:.:¡,¡ "'<"'U "''''IDID QID « "'«< .c~~ C\ H<¡'¡ N~~ ,.. 0: '" ~ ~ ¡,¡co", .00 '" 1-..,,, , "'I ~O>O> :.: 0 00>0> <r-..:¡ C~~ E , ~..,,, ~I 8 CII t:Q PHIl tca1ro.cn - "'''' IDID ID"'",,,, ~ ¡'¡~¡'¡3: Ztr.lZt1) H Z'" ¡'¡3: ¡'¡3:¡,¡3: ~ H C H ~ Q) ~ ..... > - . '" Q) > e < H Q) '" Q) > '0 ~ ¡,¡ H > rn > < 0: .U '" H < .... < 0 . " U '0 . ]N .... Q) '" Q) - '0 " e ~l .... 0\ '" 0\ - " - '" >. 0 .u_ rn .u e · H M H U U-::IH .... '" rn ~ .u H H , .0 HO:H U " '" H , H 0_ ~ - ..:¡ 0 .... .... .... më: '"' tr.IUJltI] '" e '" tI] tI] '" Q) .'" Z tI].u tI] , .... tI] '" tI] '"' "['" ¡,¡ . mern " , , .... rn rn e rn .... ~N C ~ :.: ..... Ir-Iµ:jr-t 0 rn :.: .... rn .... rn , .m~ " tf.I U U .... U 0: U .... . . ~ ¡,¡ CII-·- '" " , - - " Q) ..,,0 ~, '" - z .... 0 .u '" .u > "'~N - 0 .u . . '" · z , tI] < COO> ..... '" u .... .u .u ::I .u .u .u ::I _ CO> "'-~ '" 0 ..... tf.I tf.I '0 '" tI) '" tI) '0 '0 rn CD 3: .... ¡:: , ¡:: " f<1 H '" = r.. ..:¡ H ..:¡ I-) H .... H '" . ~N '- ,/;/9 ð ...._.._,_ _,_,,__._______.B - -_. - ~- ---- --.. -- N 01 -- "'''' -- g ~ W . _u__. ~._ ~___ ___ _____ =- _--Lt}t- ._n -. --- --.-- -- --- --- ~H~·~ ~---_- - - 0U""l "C:::I.OUl "'''' ~ "'''' '" '" ~I~ ~~~~ ~~~~ 0,,", "'''' 0..... . -U¡¡¡ - . . ~~~ NI.O~_ ~-~I.O "'0 ..,'" "'''' NNMM NNNN ..,.., "'.., "'.., NC~O "'''' .....'" 0",1iI ¡¡¡«< <¡¡¡« ~a:I~"";IC« <¡¡¡ I-< iii gjU""lB) "'N ø. I tl)1 :.: ° uu "''''''':¡ 0 "'0 v ..w ><-1iI < '" 0,,,, '0 "'''' "'''' Cl""')tI) NMO_ -.:oC'N\D O"aCCO\Ooo::rM .....0 H ..0 . . . . . . . . - . . . . :':N"':¡ ONM...... U")NOO'\ OOM\Olt' N "'.... - NNMM NNMN MMNN'oo::roo::r "'.., tI) 0 .... 0 "'0 <-< ~ ..~ ¡¡¡¡¡¡« <¡¡¡« o:¡¡¡¡U¡¡¡« « )-4N~ Z <-'" - ¡'¡<o: 0,,,, '"tI) '0 "Q OMtI) It) ¡'¡O ~ ··0 tl)H -,..:¡ X ~ ''; ~æ U" 't1 c: H I ~~ ,., .; U" ( ) C:t:ß c. ¡,¡ 0<1iI .. E-<H ~ C. ~E-< I-< '" 0 0<: ~O\tI) ID ID ID \0 "'''' > "', "'I MO'\_CO -_'0::1"'_ MO'\MO\CDI..O "'U""I .. ..:¡ . . . . · . . . . . . co "'~ ~"'S NN\,CO CCoo::rtDCO -O......MNO "'''' 0 NNMM NNNN MMNNOO::Ooo:;:' "'.., ~ ~ .. > 0 \D ,., ~ 0 0 ~ 0\ 0:': iii ¡¡¡¡¡¡« <o:¡« ¡¡¡¡¡¡UU« <¡¡¡ 0 ""'00 0\ H<~ "" ,.... 0: '" "'00 iii"'", ..00 '" '-... '" , "'I ~O'IO\ :.: ° .0>0> <.....,..:¡ c-- E ~ 'õ.q-\O ~ u aJ¡¡¡¡¡¡aJ ¡¡¡¡¡¡aJaJ aJ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡aJ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ~ iii 3: iii 3: iii 3: iii 3: Z"'Z'" iii 3: iii 3: " af C · - .. . > . Q >. I-< .. Q '" < \.< > . ~ . > a. 0 < +> X '" " < e Q '" '0 '" '" ,..:¡ .8 ItS en a. Q 0: ItS U a¡ '0 0: § 0 '" :I: Q ..... > \.< +> 0 C X U U ~ .., '" \.< ..... \.< +> >. ItS - œ " -'" 0 ......-......- '" U-..... . C II-< - ""'¡HQlH ItS- I-<+>_ . iii .. oHI.OH :I:H:¿:H ~H""'¡HtnH ~ U r-O-40H iii I-< I-< '0 Q ItS , . ... ¡¡¡ '" '- , , ø; ItnE-4U}~tI] '" .. Z "'I-<'" . .", · '" '" ""'" >. a. 1: iii .....'" '" Q .¡.JtI]J,.. tQ rn -ra I ro"t:S rtS Q e " :.: IUrtllra > tl)rt\cra Q '0..... .....0:..... ..... 0: c" .. .." " to .,..¡..... ...... .:: ..... ..... X o:U 'U U ,... .. .. iii ..., \.<UQ U \.<U a.u ~ -.. .J-~_ ro aJ ..00 - '" tI) ..¡.J->_ ( ) rtI-O- ro tI) >. > z "'''',., '" < en e +> +> U CO>O> c: ::> § 0 ..... :.; .,..¡ :I: >. U""I -0>0> "'-- .,..¡ '0 .'0 ..... ..... ItS C ..... ro 0 ro c \.< \.< ItS .,..¡ +> 0 . Q +> '" :E: I-< .., 0 '" :I: 0 ¡¡¡ iii Eo< 0 I-< ."',., -" /J19/ .- .---..--.- -_.- nn ..--. - -- - - .-. -. ._-.-. --.. -.'.---.- -- n_ N 01 ~ ~ - 0_- W ....,'" - - - - - -- .- -- ~~-~ ~- ._n '_,-. __U_. "'....- -- -. ---.-.-.-- -.------ ---- - - ---_. - _.... __ __n___._ - - -- .--- - '.- ... -- ~\.::)U) -- Po. 'trj -- \DID!':)!.:) "'0 NO-r--- :>: 0 UU . ",,,,...:I NO CX)1O\!)<qI NN N-N"d""d" ~~O "'''' "'..... 0",1» u1~tQ¡:Q "''''« H I» a:",'" -- I» '" p,¡: I tI) :>: 0 UU "'......:1 0 010 ~ ..~ ><-1» < '" 0,,,, '0 "'''' "'''' C(f")[J) Il")N\DO a:>C""""\D H ..0 . . . :>:N...:I cr"''ON...... N\D\DLl') - ............NN I"·H·~"d""d" II) 0 ¡..::¡ 0 010 8 ..,. ..~ uUCJCC <"'« >eNt::I Z <-'" -- t:H: 0,,,, ::<:11) '0 t.!)Q OMtI) 1!1 t::IO ~..o II)H -...:I - :< c:: ø .,.¡ ¡..::¡t::I .. <¡l, ø , 'Ö 0 c:: H '" c::t::I M ........ 1 Q) o 0 -..... .", t::I::<: ø", 0. 0:>:1» . . ~- 0. 8H H<I» -0 ';ü e::8 a: '" NN - ..:: <...:¡ ~O\U) ID\D!.:>\D >", P-4 I ú'J Na> \Dl"'-NC'\ 0 · . . co i:~ ;,¿",S CIltIlMN O\D~Lf'I ø ~ NN MN"<:'"d" · ... > ø \:> M .... .... ~ 0 0 .....- 0 '" 0:>:1» . '" c¡ <c¡« 0 -=I'CIIØ '" H<I» ON N.... ,.... a: '" NN ø ø 1»"'''' .00 '" 1 "'I >--.,..... -:::ca 0\ en :>: 0 "'''' ø"'''' <........:1 c-- E 0 -.,..... ~I 8 CJCJtIllIJ to CUXI CJ ..... ~ I»~I»~ I»~I»~ 01 .. · c " 'Ö .. m - .0 a: '" > H >. ~ .. H n " · 01 .z H 3: 0 , " QJ -g 'Ö 'Ö ..... ... 01 n 0. a: c n '-' ~ 01 0 0 U ...:I I» · .. n " ..... c '" c ..... '" ..... 0 "ÖH >.- · U ..... >. Q)HrtlH ~ U ~ , .,..¡ æ :>: ..... ø ¡... :::: 01001 H 0 Z . 01 U 101 01 ¡;¡ 1: I» ..... 0. , n 1 n .. c ø .. :>: '" e .c .......... ...... ¡... 0" .. '-' a: >. 0. O1U"U ~ ø ø I» " n n - Q)-+.I- 000 - '" '" '" 3: " " C CONM e z 'Ö 01 U U ~ c'" '" 0 n QJ QJ -"'''' "'-- .... '" 0 .... ..... 'Ö '" I " QJ n QJ 0 '" H '" E-t :::: :>: E-t · NM ,-. -- -.-- -- - -- /t- / e¡ ;;1.. _ . ____,.._._ ,_'n_.·__·_ _________...,,__ -.-, -- ..- .--. - - -- -.. ~ ~ . . N 0 '" ~ ~ '" - .. . -. . °ZW - "C"'IC) 0'\--- _O~.[:J,..._.__.~_. _. __ .. ____._. ----. --~:. ..~ - --- n. _._--- .- - -..- -....-. H c.. 0 '<1'oq' - C::\DtJ) ""7__ __ - ~ \DID 0.0 '" P.1u:I -CD M NO '" "'''' :>: 0 .. '0 UU 0 . . tltLr"l..:J f-N t'-- "',... .... N_ -- - "'''' - N'" 'O:t:0 '" ~ ~ '" 0:> "'''' ,... 0",'" UO U' . "'< 'U "'< H '" 0 "'''' '" <>:",'" - -- '" '" At tJ) :>: 0 0 UU 0 "'....... 0 ~~ "'''' "'"' "'0 N.... "'''' ,....... q- .. ¡,;:¡ . . ><-r.:¡ 0:>'" ....'" 0:>'" < '" -- - -- 0,,,, '0 "'''' CMtf)! "',... ,...'" -'" H..O UU UO UU . . . . . :>:N'" N'" ........ NN - "'''' -- N'" tJJ ~ 0 ~ ~ "'''' "'~ ~ "'0 "'.... "'''' "'.... v ooIxJ . "'< UU "'< UJ >tN~ 0:>'" "'0 CO'" 0" " <-'" -- -- -- - ¡:¡ 0,,,, ....UJ tJJ '0 ....Q CI""1tf) ¡:¡ H ..0 UU UO UU 11") Z~ " :>:-... ~c: - :< ¡:¡ ~ ~ .,.¡ ¡ßPo< ... 11 ~ '" ... C .... C UJ¡:¡ ~ M 01 ~~ ~~ '" I Q) NO:> ,...- 'co> 11") :E r::¡ 0:>:", o CO> C. c..H O<r.:¡ . . œ_ .... NCD "'''' , c. :E8 Z H '" N_ -- ';ã ~ 8 H ffimU) "'''' "'''' >", 1.:).... '" ''''I "',... co'" "',... ....'" œ . . . '" ~~ ~ ~CDS "'u ........ UU -'" ....'" -- ~ -- "'''' -- N'" ~ œ ~ H > ... c: ~ M "' ~ "'"' ~ ¡:¡ 0 0 NJ.<" ON , .... O:>:r.:¡ UU . "'< U'" "'< 0 .r:;~~ ~ H<'" ,...... "',... N~~ <>: '" -- -- ~ ~ r.:¡CD", œCC '" ~.,...", , "'/ ~"'''' :>: 0 UU "'U 0"'''' <,...... 0-- E , -...", ~I 8 "'''' "'''' "'''' "'''' "'''' "'''' i "'3: "'3: "'3: Z;", "'3: "'3: ~ 0 œ œ -.... .... > t: t: t: Hili III ~ ~ ~ ~ H-.i --rl j¡ III III III .w Hk H k· ] .... .... .... -'" .w H.w '" '" '" H "'''' H'" ~ -0 -0 -0 k "';j ;j œ ~ HO HO HO "'III III'" "'''' 0 H:3: H3: H:3: '" e ....t: "'t: œ H H H III 0 UH IIIH 0 , I , ........ ~ .... 0 ¡... '" '" '" UIII I U, œ z;. '" '" . '" ~'" . ~ "[ r.:¡ III'" III'" III'" .w", .Q ~ :>: ....> ....> ....> . I "'> tJ> o ~ ~ œ... ~ to U.... U.... U.... '" .... . III ~ ~ r.:¡ ~'" ~ø:¡ ~ø:¡ > . kø:¡ .w.w œcc '" .... .w III "'t: ';.Nt'f'J .>. .>. .>. "'''' e>. 0 0"'", .will .will .will 011I t: ... -"'''' ",ø:¡ "'''' ",ø:¡ >..., ....ø:¡ -.ir.. "'-- III III III r.:¡ :z: .., '" '" :>: . NM - /9/93 ._------ ....:...--- --_._------~-- ------.:- -.--. --------+- - ~ cl c"'''' n ---. -- n _ 0",,,, .. __..+ n _.__ -.-. --, --._- -_.- . -. --- ._,- ..- H P4 ------ . ' c: ..,,,,, <.:I "'''' "'''' Ai I enl ..,.- ""D ..,.on or- r- _ '" 0 . . 0 . ",on":> _0 r- N "'c» "'..,. 00 NM _M N_ NN NN '"b:E 0 0",<.:1 ro.: C.: .:ro ':<II UU H <.:I c:",'" <.:I '" '" ''''I :E 0 p...,....¡ 0 "'''' MO C_ <C" ..~ 0 0 ><-<.:1 N'" .: '" N_ C,'" 'a "'''' "'''' OM "'I OOJ "'N C»..,. "'OJ HuO <IlU . 0 0 :EN":> -on Mc» r-on -M -. NN NN NN NN [JJ fz1 0 "'''' ~ MO OJ- ~ ..~ <II': U<II .:<:; UU [JJ ><N<.:I -OJ - 0.. " .:_", N_ t:¡ c,'" ....[JJ [JJ 'a fz1S OMenl t:¡ ~"O <IlU If) " -...¡ - X ~c:: ~ ~ OM t:¡ !I +' gP< ~ c:> '" - 0 c: [JJ~ t) '" J c:: M It) I ) §:E:§ 0", t:¡ M", C. P<H ~- i C. :!::e-< fz1 H":;:µ:¡ - .. ..:: fJO\~ ~ - E-< H "'''' "'''' >", 10.... '" It''l on", "'''' 0..,. NC» ....0 m . 0 0 '" C\~ .... ~OJ3 ON "'c» NC» "'..,. NC» ~ ..:: NN NN N_ NN N_ ~ m C\ H > ... c:: ~ M ~ t:¡ 0 0 - " E-< O¡;:<.:I <II <II <II <II <II <II <:;<II UU - .BIGICI ~ H~~ N+'+' c: '" ~ ~ <.:I e,,,,, mOO '" .. _-L.o;tLn , "'I '" -.. ICIC'IC'I ¡;: 0 <-< M'" '" <r-..:> ~ c-- E " -..", C-' 8 ~I '" <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <II <Ilro '" ~ <.:I~ <.:I~ <.:I~ <.:I~ <.:I~ +' <.:I c III - - C-' .µ III H H - § ~ -..... .µ H H H . H<:: -'" H H H +' 'H 0 H-'" Û 1: , H<II H> "'.µ "'... "'... ¡;¡ "'''' '" '" .-<'" -¡¡ '" ro "'<:: ro '" 111'0 u'O ~ ~ "'N "'''' .-<... .-<<:: -<:: m +' ro.-< 111'0 uu Uro III H c .-<'" '-<'0 -'" -'" o '" B u, u·... .-< .-< '0.-< ~ -<:: -:x: '111 "'0 <X: 0 M <-< '" 'O:x: > H m Z .-< , c: <:;, >0, ¡;¡ I <.:I 'C-' 0 , '" +' ¡;: '0 .µa. <:: "'''' .-<'" <-< c m ~ m+,+, C-' <X: 111 "'0 >0<:: DlUJ '-<UJ ~ m ~ <.:I .µ .¡J UO <::0 1110 moo '" ro..... :x:.-< -M ro... >... ~NM .µ<:: .-< . U ....-< .-< ~ c"'''' .....0 .µ..... "'III 0'" >o(!) -"'''' <::<II UJ:: .-<z ¡;: III¡;: <-< (1).....0;- 0 ro '" .¡J 0 ',,---, <II <.:I <-< '" 0 <-< ONM ,/II?~ +------.-----..-- - u. _ Appendix 6 1996 TMP Arterial Segments Operating at i. Mid LOS C (Data Reported at ~ 60% Level of Confidence) - - 6-1 ,.4 /fJS- . .-.. . - --- ~. - ---- - - -..-- ~--.._- . - .-. . ._- --- -. - - --.----. .~. ----. . u__u_ ----- -- -- ~- -- ~ Appendix 6 - -- 1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENTS OPERATING AT ~ MID LOS C (Data Reported at L 60% ~Level of Confidence) Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H st.') - Class III Lower Half of LOS C Avg. MPH Above LOS D LOS C Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe NB 11:30 - 12:00 15.4 2.4 13 - 19 NB 12:00 - 12:30 15.4 2.4 (6 MPH) NB 12:30 - 1: 00 15.7 2.7 NB 1:00 - 1: 30 13.82 0.8 - SB 11:30 - 12:00 14.63 1.6 SB 12:00 - 12:30 15.1 2.1 1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone. 2 This speed is an average of 3 data runs with a Level of Confidence of " 60%. - 3 This speed is an average of 4 data runs with a Level of Confidence of 40%. Otay Lakes Rd. (East H st. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) - Clas~~I Lower Half of LOS C Avg. MPH Above LOS D LOS C Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe NB 4:30 - 5:00 20.3 2.3 18 - 24 NB 5:00 - 5:30 . 18.7 0.7 (6 MPH) ~. ,l919ú> ---. - ---. - - -..-- . --- 6-2 ..-.~-~---"_. ---~:..~- -~.:._--~_:: ..:._-- _._-~-:.::.::..:..- ---..:.::.::..::=:.:. Appei1di-x:~ 6~-:"':=-"::":":: -- - -- ------ ...- - - -- ---- - - _. .._ m_ .__._ __ .___ _ . .- - --- --- - -- - --1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENTS OPERATING AT_ ~.MID LOS _ C u (Data Reported at ~ 60% Level of Confidence) Palomar st. (I-5 NB Rmps - Broadway) - Class III Lówer Half of LOS C Avg~ MPH Above LOS D LOS C Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe EB 4:30 - 5:00 13.5 0.5 13 - 19 EB 5:00 - 5:30 14.1 1 .1 (6 MPH) WE 11:30-12:00 15.3 2.3 - WB 12:00 - 12:30 13.8 0.8 WE 4:00 - 4:30 13.5 0.5 WB 4:30 - 5:00 13.9 0.9 WE 5:00 - 5:30 15.1 2.1 WE 5:30 - 6;00 14.0 1.0 - - - A: /97. - - .~- - -- - -- --- ---. -- - ----" . _.- . - - -- 6-3 ----- --- - -- - - ---. -- -- -. ----.--. ~ -- - Appendix 6 - 1996 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENTS OPERATING AT ~ MID LOS C (Data Reported at ~ 60% Level of Confidence) Palomar st. (I-5 NB Rmps - Broadway) - Class III Lówer Half of LOS C Avg~ MPH Above LOS D LOS C Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe EB 4:30 - 5:00 13.5 0.5 13 - 19 EB 5:00 - 5:30 14.1 1 .1 (6 MPH) WB 11:30-12:00 15.3 2.3 - WE 12:00 - 12:30 13.8 0.8 WB 4:00 - 4:30 13.5 0.5 WE 4:30 - 5:00 13_9 0.9 WE 5:00 - 5:30 15.1 2.1 WE 5:30 - 6:00 14.0 1.0 ( -- :..........;.... , .----.- -... ~_ u . - - ~ It?-- - - --- 6-3 --- - _,___..__.._______~_____"_ __n_______ .~,______.___~ -- - ---- --- -- - . u__ _ - - ----.~-- - ---------- ------- ----- ---- .--- ---- --- -~ - - -- __ _ __ _n_" _ _ ._ -- - -- u_ ___ Appendix 7 1996 TMP Arterial Interchange Segments Operating at ~ Mid LOS D (Data Reported at ~ 60% Level of Confidence) - \ -- --- A/99 \..---- .. -- ___ _ __ .3-1 ..--.-- ---- - - .--._- - . --- ----- - - - - - -- - --AppendiX -., --- - -.- . ----- -- -- -- -- --- -- ..n. _._._ -_-~. - - -- - ---- - - 1996 TMP -- ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS OPERATING AT ~MID LOS D (Data Reported at L 60% Level of Confidence) - ... -- _n -'-. , H st. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave) - Class III Lower Half of LOS D Avg. MPH Above LOS E LOS D Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe WE 11:30-12:00 10.5* 1.5 9 - 13 WE 12:00 - 12:30 10.6 1.6. (4 MPH) WE 12:30 - 1: 00 9.9* 0.9 WE 1:00 - 1: 30 9.3 0.3 WE 4:00 - 4:30 10.3 1.3 - * Data reported with a 40% Level of Confidence LOS E \. -- Avg. MPH Below LOS D LOS E Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe WE 5:00 - 5:30 8.8 0.2 7 -:- 9 (2 MPH) - nn Palomar st. (Bay Blvd. - Industrial Blvd.) - Class III Lower Half of LOS D Avg. MPH Above LOS E LOS D Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Ranqe 394XEB 4:00 - 4:30 9.4 0.4 9 - 13 EB 4:30 - 5:00 10.2 1.2 (4 MPH) "--' ___A~{?~ __0 ,- .~-- - .---------- -~ - -' -- -----. _ n -"'-"'----- 7-2 APPENDIX 0 /i2~Z- ~ .~ ,. MEMORANDUM November 27, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the GMOC Other Interested Parties FROM: Ed Batchelder, Senior PlannØ SUBJECT: Development Forecast Report- Preliminary Information Attached you will find a major projects location map, two sets of spreadsheets, and a table of Chula Vista's historic permit activity. Planning Department staff is in the final stage of preparing the complete 12-18 month, and 5-7 year forecast tables and report, and will distribute and present such at the 12/5 meeting. For reference in the interim, the first spreadsheet set reflects a comparison of residential units projected for development in last year's forecast report (July 1995 through December 1996), in comparison to actual building permit activity. There is one spreadsheet for each of the two water district areas. Please note that the forecast figures represented inputs provided by the development community, and as such, were considered as maximum potential. As can be seen, and consistent with the trends in development activity over the last three to four years, actual activity was once again only about 50-60% of that projected by the development community. Looking to the historic permit activity table, the trend can easily be seen in the post 1990 years, due largely to lingering recession. Regional economic sources suggest that 1997 will not see a substantial change over 1996. The second spreadsheet set reflects a current snapshot of the processing and construction status for all major projects. The last several columns indicate the number of residential units already completed, as well as those that aré under construction and nearing permit issuance. The sum totals of these latter columns (indicated at the bottom of the second page), effectively represent the amount of development activity likely to occur over the next 12-18 months. Those numbers suggest something in the neighborhood of 800+ completions, and approximately 600-700 issuances. Looking to the historic table, these levels are again largely similar to what has been occurring over the last three years. (B:\GMOC96\PRE-FORE.MEM) 1f,;2~g · , ~ .. ......II::"ë .r:. .!ã;c»ü) o c: a.. 0 CD a. c: c» en Ø) ':» '!I:I m-c CJøø> , - a:: c: J: at C» C» CD Ø) ct) ,:¡¡:.::¡:aJ°tnCC:"C"CCø .J UJ GlGI..JccuëñëÞ00:=_c: I- CIIe»Ca:l=::1::100....~.!a:I UUOŒ:;;:mm3=3=C¡I->..J C,,) <II >- . . . . . . ~~-CU.J.J.J...J..J..J..J..J..J W "¡"¡~Õujujujujujujujujuj .., o CD,....COOJ~N~~~~~~~ dJ ex: ~~~~ a.. -" a: ~C o ",Om ..., :: ~ -ª'; ~ ~(.):;¡o -== 1: == ::Jcnc'g -=:; Oca __;;~tDCa:l. 11. =~ -cèiioj~:E ~ 0 ~z_ =~~~~~m~s ,....., D¡I e Œ Œ ä:.g.g >-,2 :1§ g 'E L-' t; ~.!!i!!i!!i!'¡¡'¡¡iŠ.ilõ~&!~ _....I _O,...N(") "'NC'?~Il)CD""CO.........,.......,... ~ = a. « ~ CJ) .... (.) W J o ~~ - z", ..... ....¡¡¡ ~ 'II·!! ~ ~ : o ., ,:: ~\ ô> r :~ J ",'--'- 7;1 6~ ~ ~ «cñ ( :J:zJ¡ ~~ Uz~ ' .::::; z :s ~ Q.. () O~:~:;:¡OOO~OI"- ""& .... 't :; Iò. ..... - II) .,., ": IS:. oJ I/) :;¡! ~ ~ ~ ~~oco~ooooo 0:2 ~ ;- - II. I'- Õ II) . ¿ _ ~ . . <: o;:~8~~oo;;o~....:;: 8; ~ I). 1-0< to. ... - - - DO II) :: o Io '" ~ ,. ¡.. ¡;; ~!::::::::oe!?::eoooo 0;; ~ I- !!!.... - ~ " ~ ." ::::: !::: ~ M ~ ." ." ~ .,,::::: ." ~ ..... ~ .J ¡;¡ "" ..... - - - ::::: =: " < o"CIiS :oooo~ooooo 0;; ~ ~ 1Zo~1Zo~ - N.... N ,.:..: " " - - ~ o O~::~~~og~O:: O~ j!: « .::~~ ...N_ - :! ~ "5 ~ >000001'-00000 0..... DO "2¡¡ ... ~ ... ~ ... =: :; ~ ~ .õ' "" ~ ~~;:;: ~ J oJ II) - .. .~~~ ~ "'I" ... ..,. .. ~- ~ '" ~. ~ ä '" =' _ 00 _ _ " -: !o. _ .......- ¡;;: -< =: < (;o '" =: I> ¡.¡ ;:;. ¡,,¡ .5 '" ¡a ~ > ï ~ ~ « ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u.. ~::::;:~....o ~ '" ~ « ... II) - -.... ;:;. = ~ z ~~ ~o ~ ~ .... !:::z z )0 ~ 100 ~ .... N « ~ " !i; ;;..: «> g ......... ."." \C \C -< "'0 ~ ~_...",...-:;:: ~ U . ~ b!:1 1Io~ ." 0100 ~ t- DO .. ;¡ Õ ¡ .. ~ :g ~ ... - N -~ ~ :!.... t;; ~- .. _~œ] 10__.... 0000.... ...... Q_~"'" Iò. _DO'" <'I .... ;;.. ~=.s ~ '" - N -< ~ >! t5 ~ ... ~!; c f-< Cu c: . II. ¡;" = __ O~~a. _ ¿ 1aI~........ , I:IJQ E .... Ii: Q¡ 11 ¡:::g.,;ð :.:: Iò. ;!;tõ:::::~oooo\O "'~ §j¡.1! ~=g::1! -~Jo '" - ... ::E1! ;;.. ... - i Io Q .... .... ... .... ~ ¡ '- <...>_ z:; ~ N__ ..... ....ê'~ ~¡"'~E p _1:':1 -,Q.,õi ~ZO~,Q., ... ~ U1!~ = ~ ¡:¡ .. ., U:!: ...................0 '" t- ... oS,1i ...... I>- - N '" .... N '" \C _ '-' \10 ....J '" N - '" .J !t:- o III:: « ;:;0 ~ <",i!5 ~ ~O ~ g ¡::: ... ~ ~ '" ~ '" £ z " < . ....... '" '" .... ... ... 0 0.. '" 0.. o ¡,.. ... 0.. ... .... - .... .. 1&1'" .... ~ ~ II:> '" ..... 0 - 0 ... !!j ~ ....... '" ~ ~ ...._0\ 00000 .... ¡,.. ........... .... ... ~ _ M ~ < ~ M~ ~ . ...._ ¡¡:; I!" ........... £ ~ . " ~ . ....= ¡,.. ::::~......~OOÕÕO... g: ... < .., - .... ~ ~ = ~ 0 0\ 0.. '" :E ~ I!" .... -... g: ~ " - V ~ 1&1 ¡,.. ~ :;;! ~ ~ ¡::: ::¿ g: .0. ~.., - M _ I ~ Z........ ....... ~ i:' >-~¡:~ ....... £ ~... ~ oJ .. ~ ~ . . . ~.... _ 0.. ... 0\ 0\ "'... ... ...... _ .. 0 Jo g:; :! £... - 0.. r.: ·2 I:¡ ~ ;; 0 '" "'...... :;. 1: !!j I!" .... '" ... 0 0 .= i ~ .... '" g II:> .. = ~ .. .. .¡¡ ~ ü .. ..:..; . g: '" ~ ~!¡¡ <'!.ã 5-- E ~ ~ < ~§ ~ ~l rn ui 0 0 .., ... z ~ .5 ;::I ... Z Z5!-...... i t.:I i i< ~ ~ ~ S~; ~JI ; Jl ~~ ~ o = _=- =U..J~ ffi -J: ~ -£ >~ :I ~ ~~~~~~~~~i~ 5 J¡ JI ~j ! ~~¡:¿¡:¿¡:¿!-!-~¡¡¡zi;; U = = tj,Š 2 «o.qo:;¡!~!-d« ~ .. «I ..,¡¡¡øc:øc:¡:¿..,..,O¡:..,w ¿ j- is Rõl"S- ~ '" --~- ------- .,-~.. .- -- . ----.- ---- . o 0 0 0 0 0 I........ - ~ ~ - ~ . !.I. , "".... ~ ~ '" , ." ~ ~ i ~ OO~O 0:2 :2 ;¡; æ ï .... "."' a ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 I..... ;0:......... - ~ ~ -< ... '. .1)\ _ f-o 0( !.I.'. r ... o ~ II) .1 ': ~ .... f-< '" 0 0 '>0 <;> <;> '>0 '>0 '" ~ - - . . ~ :: ~ . ( « 000.... 0.... .... U!.l. - .... ~ "' ~ " "" o"l;l~ 00\00 0'0'" .... ~ ~ 110"", .... - ....... .... .¡¡ · ~ 8 .. 000.... 0.... r---... « .. - - ... "1;1 .. ¡a¡ ¡;¡ Iii ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 '>0 '>0 <;> <;>.... ..... '" 1": ~!.I. .... - ......., .... ú ~ ~ I ~ I ~ '" ~ Z . · !õ: !.I. .. ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ . ~ -: ~ < ; œ « ¡.¡ '" œ 5 Jo ;;¡ ¡:oj .5 III ~~ > ~ ~ ~ -< 5 ~ - ~ U <;> .... -.... .... « ¡a¡.... - ;;¡ = :¡J '" :z: "1;1 is ~ ¡;;:::: ~ :: ~ :z: >- ~ 110 ~ -< "' . r-~ :;¡.~ <;> <;> <;> U < ... (> u. ¡ U ~ ~ II) !;;~\C ~ ~ ::! ~ ~ 0\ '" - 0 ~ - ~ Q ~ O\;¡ ¿ a: ¡... ; ~ '"'I _ W -< !.I. ':: z = " ..J '" ..", ;:¡ - - « ~CI~~ ~ ~ ~ . Ia;1ZU. -"'~ 13]' ¡;,;¡¿¡;S~ "': È i'i ¡:c:;:¡ .. ... .. Q "- -. V, 0 'u CJ\... U. 0 II., ..... =~1 -<r.¡'" ~1!£ "":_-. ¡a¡ :;¡ >oi~ !-o Z In '" ''''' .. ~~~f ;;¡ ~~ =£~ > 0 ;;;J a.,... ¿, ~ "S! X < ~ Q = .. ..;¡ ':!! 0 <;> .. ~ ð ;;. \IC >-..J ~ ,:j '=- ..... = "';' øc -< ;;¡ u~ <"':5 ::: ~ ~ :2 ... ;;¡.. J;r" ~ Z ~ ;:E < . ....... <;> ... .. "- - - · ~ ~ ~ ~ ",'" ... - .... '" - - .... ... - ~ ~ "' ~ < 0 ~ - ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . -- øc ~ ¡;; ~ ~ =;: '" '>0 '>0 '" :E !!;!;: - - - g: ~ ¿ - " ~ ¡,,¡ 0 0 '" .= ..J * ~ ,"<II ~ <;> <;> 0 ¡:. >~¡:~ ~£ ..J ... > - ;;¡.~ <;> 0 -: j¡ .... : Jo ~ ;§ ti a., a '>0 '>0 '" '>0 till ë- !!; ~ - - - - .~ ~ . , ~ . ~ § §... §." ä ~ i. ~ ~~ ~ < <!~ d~i! ~: '" ~ I- I- 0( ¡... 3 < 1>1I 11 ",200"O0%"O .::it ¡... .11'> ~ ¡... ¡... 5 ¡... 5 ~~ " ~~ ~ ~.~ Ii ill ;: . ¡; ~ w~ ~ ~.¡¡ - .¡¡." s ...::J "'~.~Z:_.=..Oì N o ::311:1ø::: œ _e 2: ~e;::;- ::i =: ¿~o~ ~ ~~ Ii ¡¡D..;i 8 ~ ~~3> 0- ,~~ti~. g ~:iì~~ ~ D.t¡ ~ u.-g ::i zOf-6}i 11:I :II ~g ~ o ø::: II'> ø::: - ::I _ u :II .= ..J ¡... ~ ~ . tCj w ~~~ ~ ~ - ~ 0 "- f-o "' :¡ on ;:; '" '" 00( ",0 '" ..... ;;; 0 00('" ..... .., 0 .., .., ... 0 .., .. u i2 2;- ... N N .., - ..... - N .. - gj - ¡,; '" 1ií 0 " '" ë ;z: ·C f-o 0. Z "' 0 0 00( "'0 - ;;; .., '" 0 0 ... ::E f-o ;:0", ..... 0 .., ;;; 0 .., 0 0 0 0 0 on - ... - N ... - ..... '" N ~ f-o ;!:! N ",0 ..... N '" '" .. 0 .. ..... on:!; 0 ... '" .., 0 0 N 0 ... 0 '" '" "' - - - '" ::: 00( z '" ¡¡; '" "'0 '" 0 '" 0 0 '" ::E N 0 0 ... N 0 0 0 :=; 0 ::: ::E '" u '" ",,,, ..... N N 0 0 .. ... 0 on!:; 0 ... '" ;:::; 0 0 N 0 0 0 N , '" - - ..... >< ::> "' on ¡.. on ::> - '" '" - ::EO !:; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !:; 00( ¡.. U U I>J .... ;: ~ "" 1::;0 '" õ: ... N ..... '" '" ... 0 0 0 0 .., ¡.. 0 ~ ..... "' - ..... ..... - .., ... '" ¡", ~ '" 00( - ¡.. I>J ::: Z - ~ z ø:¡ '" ¡¡; '" '" '" 00( >< ~:¡:: S ::Eo N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N i .... ~ " I>J - I>J , o z: u ~ ~ _ I>J "'''' '" ..... ... '" 0 0 ..... ~ ''''~ 00( on - ..... '" ..... .., 0 0 ... 0 0 0 0 - - ... '" " 00( ~ , ::> '" - ¡.. 0 '<> z ::> ¡", on 22 = ~ ::; ;!:! "'0 '" 0 '" 0 0 > ==.... ::E .., 0 0 ... N 0 0 0 0 0 0 - N 00( ¡.. >< ,.¡ z: ,.¡ ~ 0 ~ 1::;0 '" ... N .., '" 0 .., ..... ==:¡:: .., '" ... 0 ..... '" - 0 - - 0 0 N U 00 '" "' - - ... ::: 00( .... Z 0 . '" ¡¡; M '" '" '" 0 '" .... '" ::E N 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 0 '" ::E '" u '" 1::;0 .., N ..... 0 ..... ... 0 - 0 '" 0 0 0 '" - ... '" '" - N , '" >< ::> "' on ::> ;!:! "'0 '" N - .., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::E N .., '" :;;- on "<! "' - O"i ;:; on f-o '" on i2 '" <::0 Z O"i f-o 00( ~ ;z: ;z: "' on 0 f-o U "' Z u ~ on U '" - '" Z '" Z ~ ~ Ggj ;;¡ 00( '" ;;¡ ;z: <::0 - U ~ .,; '" - ...: ...: "' ~ U ~ - - - ;z: '" "" ~ !:2 ~ ~ 00( '" "' ~ 0 '" gj gj "' ::> a: ~ <::0 " : :s on on on ~ u. , U U <::0 0 :E " >< f-o '" '" '" !:¡ !:¡ 5 f-o "' r:: 00( on Ó Ó Ó on S ~ '" f-o 00( '" '" '" 00( 00( "' 00( 5 - 0 '" on on f-o '" on on w '" a: 00( 900( '" u 0 '" '" <::0 ;z: - - ...: 0 ::E ~ iri ,¡9ólO7 -..~-..--..._._...- "- .----- _.._~--- ---_...._._.,------~..._._~---- ~ '" f- ...¡ ::> '" ¡:S "' < ...¡ >C 0 0 u < 0 M 0 - .". ~ - ~ 0 Z . f- ¡¡: ;¡ 0 C "- ~ 0 ·0 Q. ...¡ '" 0 < "' ;:;: f- :J .". >C 00 0 .". N 0 '" - M - - 00 ~ f- ;!J "- 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... '" '" ...¡ ~ < ~ Z "' ¡¡: "- 00 0 00 CO ;:;: 0 - 0 - 0 N ;:;: "' U "' "- .". .". '" '" - 0 0 0 0 - , "' ::¡ :J Eo< Eo< '" :J '" - "- U '" ~ ;:;: 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ - -< ~ U ¡... "'I '" t- - ~ '" "- 0 0 0 0 .". .". ~ 0 '" '" ~ ¡..- .... ...¡ '" < "'I ¡... ~ ~ Z - ¡... - "'I "' ¡¡: "- == -< Z == 5 ;:;: 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ _ ~ ;J ;:¡¡ "'I ¡... " "'I ~ ~ "'I Z U ~ ;J "'I [;J "'I "- 0 0 0 0 .". .". "~;J~ "' '" &": rIl 0 ~ :J '" ,=='" < '" -< == ~ ~ - "- 0 0 0 ;:;: 0 M 0 - 0 .". ¡... ¡... >< ~ z .;¡ > 0 ;J "- -< ;:¡¡ ..., >C '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...;¡ QO '" ...¡ ;J _ ~ ~ == . ~ ¡¡: u ~ "' "- co ;:;: 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;:;: "' u "' "- '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 , "' ::¡ :J '" :J ;!J "- ~ ;:;: 0 >C 0 0 0 >C '" u; ...¡ u; '" ;:;: ¡:S f- "' :I: 0 '" ;:;: ~ f- "' 0 f- U :I: f- U ~ "' u; ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 "' :J 0 '" '" '" '" æ '" < .; 0. ::J >- ~ ;:;: '" s: < u ...¡ "- ~ >- 0 "' '" ¡:S "' '" '" 0 Q "- ...¡ :s ¡:S c Z < ...¡ ¡:: 0 ~ ~ ...¡ '" <J) :> :> " '" co f- 0. < Q - N M .". ~ ;:;: - !!o àj ,1101(:>$ FIGURE 4 HISTORIC HOUSING AND POPULATION GROWTH CITY OF CHULA VISTA ..............................................80:7 1~~¡li~~~ ,·.·...·..·...1<· ·.·.·.·...·.·.·.·...····....·.··..·..·.·.·...i...···............................................... ..·...·.....·..·.i... ··j·······,·.·y~"r.·"~;¡..··.·· i i·.ccc i< «<i'" j,,.;¿, < 1< i< li<n '< i«) '\.' < 1<. < 1<.'.'.. «iQ.q,FnY.. 1980 407 374 84,364 1981 195 496 86,597 1982 232 129 88,023 1983 479 279 89,370 1984 1,200 521 91,166 1985 (1) 1,048 1,552 116,325 1986 2,076 1,120 120,285 1987 1,168 2,490 124,253 1988 1,413 829 128,028 1989 1,680 1,321 134,337 1990 664 1,552 135,163 (2) 138,262 1991 747 701 141,015 1992 560 725 144,466 . 1993 435 462 146,525 1994 700 866 149,791 1995 798 718 153,164 1996 915 820 154,869 (3) 1)IIIrontgomery AnnexatIon (2) 1990 Census Population (4/1/90). (3) Planning Department Estimate. - Reflects DOF comprehensively revised population figures. /lóJ" 9 .. .--..-.. .... "'-'-'--."..-'--'--- -..--- -~-_.._--.__..._.._. --'x "'ñ '" «~ . èo en '" > :~~~~~ "''"''"' "- ",0 w , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , '"''''"''" '" o~ ¡¡: Zoü , ,....,....000');: N"-~ '" - ~~a:: ~_N - C)~ w en en C) ;¡:::. , « "' U 0 L.UO~ N "'W", -;J¿fi,?f!. M 0>- w ~~~:::R u...CI)~1- , , , , , , , , , IÖt:..:o~ o ... 0 en 0"'«« , , , , , , , , , I , , , I : I """",en en .....1.l)C')~ "- . . Z"'"')UC::: ¡¡j~uic.ó 'ON - "--- ~ WO> ,<U U C) < ~...J:CZ c.. < ~~Q O.....O;:::~~~~ "--"- <DN<D U , , I , , I , , I I , , :I.l)N"=tONCDC)1.l) <D",O ZOC) , , , , , , en 'l;fr--N'o:tt"')(")(")'V <DN<D Z",W (DWeD......................... _NN Z <C)'" 0 I- ëi ",ñ w C/) '" --,X « "- <~ . è:5 ü 0 '" > N'o:tcnVCC _",,"en "- ",N , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I :,....Œ:I.....Mt--. ","'''- <D 0' W ~ ¡-ZOO , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ","'0 a:: 0 enZ'" (D1.l)(D<OtD _N en C)~ en " 0 < «C) >en ~ U <:: u. w a:: w:,;¡: (DI- U o ~~ ;f!.';/."$.*-#- ;f!.?ft.?ft. a>Z < a>W c.. L.L.>::>W I , , I I I , , , , , , , , I '......NNan,..... "''"'''' < OÜI-~ , , , , , I"'-V 1.0 100 CD NO en .....:¡;; Z c..< -o:tV"';V"¡ ui,..:r--.: U w <", >-11. w , U ...10 '" ~ w °...JIZ :J..J X --'<~ ...,W c.. '" º O.....Or::~~U;~ "--"- '> en I I : , , I I I , I , , IIJ'}NVONWO)I.O <DN<O ZOC) , , , , , <D",O > Vr--N'o:t(,,)(,,)(,,)V <ON<O <cw U Z",W (D CD CD......................... _NN 1-0 <C)'" (D~..J . . . . . . >- W>« !D a::<c- en --,XZ Z :J..JI- >-W <~O en Wmo.....o.....CO(").....W "--"- -aui en'" '" - , , , , , , , - COVI.ONV...........C)I.ON <ON<O <-'" C):JZ I I '<0 <0",0 >->-, <'" ZOC) , , , , , , , "VOV.....NONWC)I.('} «0 N ~C)tDtOtO;!~~~;! <ON<O -:I:W uC) Z",W - _NN CI><~ U. 0 ,-,W¡:¡: <C)'" ",W::;; ü- <"'>- enZO u.C/) 00- , . . . , . , WZ", O~ Z,,-Z -<,,- <='" "'>-X en5" C) W"'~ >-a:: "'~ Z",Z 0 C)U')VV\OU')(D'o:t,....CO ",,"_N "'w ¡¡;t:º ,",," ¡,()VC)VWO,...cnCOC") <D .., "' !::« W'" I I I , , , , , , aJ MC") CO I.l)OO CO 0""'''''' Nen",," 0::;;0 , , , , , , , N en t..') co -'" ",Z" <0 CO.....OtOMcnMI'-O'o:t <D co 0 ~Oo:: üW "'0 O",W """ L!}I'COcomcn.....NVLO '" cnmcnC)mcn~~~~ 00_ "''''' >- ~X X '" --- <t~-I r-- UO< , W::;;'" L() '" Z W ::; O"'Z UW u...~« C) < X ->- >--'" ~u...cnI "'« Z U 0- ~ 0",,,, ¡¡: O;f!.ðO ,*"#,rJ!.';/!.'<f!.ìf!.'ift.'f1!.'#.tJ!.rf!. ?ft.tft';¡ft.tfl.'#. ~ 00:: ZO--' <c ~'" Il)mMNNCO.....CO(")("')(") ~~~~~I , , , , , , , '" >-W ;;)u.D.. a:: '" - Il).....,.,. ('),...ON mwr--I,Q , , , , , , 0 !!2", "<",,, N~NMNuiMc.óc-jVCÓ . . 'O'¢' .,; X", I-I-~ , "'W >CJ)~C> 1l),...1'--.......... ZZ< 0 -'" ,,>- 2:.", U< ~~ ::J::>L.U.-. 000::::1.0 :¡;; --'" OÜ<~ <- U z"- ¡-Üc::..... w ot: --,X -«06 <~ . ,,'" zou...c:o w -z Nr--.v'o:tmOOI.O J')cor-- Ó "'" '" > ~~~:2rel , I I I , , 1 "' :JI-I-~ . ZOü I.O.....NC»NNIJ')O)cnU')1'- , , , en >è 0 W (")Il)N(,,)CD!;:::::~m:::~ "OZ- .. "''' w,...LQ......m '" <'" z'" ~W::>~ a oð~ <" 0 (l)I-OW ~ <en ::::>CI)()I- >-'" 0::::>(1)0::: ~ ",0 --'XZ ::I:""')::::>O 5X . ~~º co......"'C"......COCO\o\oONOJ tDcno...-o en ,,'" ...J0(l)Q. ,;, :::í ~~~~ê5o~~~~w ~"'C"\ON"'C"I 1 1 I I , , i ;¡; >è «ZW w ;0; Z 0 C) , , :JI-WO::: 0: ~~co:::~~~~~~~ N°"'C"t'-N "- <'" 0 '" . Z W ...-mcccccc - I-ZUu.. ~ <¡§'" 0 X O:JoO U «OcoO w enuen ~ '" I-C)"'-Z G u: '" ¡¡;- UZ"O 0 ,. - . en '" W-ZO , ) -", q...-NM"'C"\Occt'-comZ "'-NM"'C"\Occt'---como ~N'" en ti~aw 2< ocococococococococow cncncncncnmOJmmo 000 ¿, "WO°Cl) o~~~~~~~~~() mcncncncnmmmmo 000 .~./ <W ...-........................................N NNN '" ~a:::I:«~ Ž ..,>- '" 0 en >- . z en en - ~ - en o . . - Z' . . .g, W ,. 0 ,; j; .4 õ11¿) ~. . - I . ., ---.-¡ FIGURE 5 - JULY 1996 COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAl f INSTITUTIONAL PROJECT STATUS LISTING Square Footage Total Status DRC# Project Name Address Office Retail Industrial Sq. Fl Under Construction 9509 Jeromes 775 Plaza CI. 40,000 40,000 9530 Gas Station/Mini Mart 1495 Melrose' 1.912 1.912 9539 Church 750 1st Ave. 14,500 14,500 9542 CommURetail 689 Palomar SI. 12,000 12,000 9545 Church Expansion 293 H SI. 384 384 9546 Hospital Expansion 373 &435 H SI. 254 ,500 254,500 9628 Gas StationlFast Food 1498 Melrose Ave. 1,736 1,736 9643 Service Station 2210 Otay Lakes Rd. 2.520 2.520 327,552 Plan Check 9519 Broadway Business Homes 760 Broadway 20.704 20,704 9525 McDonalds 2254 OIay Lakes Road 3,233 3,233 9609 Warehouse Showroom 1150 Bay Blvd. 55,000 55,000 9629 Restaurant 397 E SI. 2,890 2.890 9635 Auto Service 840 Lazo CI. 17.700 17,700 9640 Auto Service 1550 E. H SI. 1.650 1,650 101,177 Design Review 9514 Industrial Bldg. 875 Canario CI. 18.745 18.745 - 9536 Comm'I/Retail Telegraph Cyn/La Nacion 6,176 6,176 ì 9537 Gas StationlMini Mart 401 Telegraph Canyon 1,083 1,083 9541 MCA Amphitheater Otay Valley Rd. 55,890 55,890 9543 Wendy's 895 E H SI. 3.309 3,309 9611 Multi Screen Theater 1025 Tíerra del Rey 34,170 34,170 . 9612 Price Club Addition 1144 Broadway 6,600 6.600 9613 Kaiser Phann.Temp. Bldg. 3955 Bonita Rd. 2,400 2,400 9614 Price Club Addition 895 H SI. 16,000 16,000 9620 Trash Transfer Station 1855 Maxwell Rd. 7,500 76.000 83,500 9623 Drive Thru Restaurant 75 North Broadway 5.710 5,710 9625 Auto Detail 2952 Main SI. 698 698 9626 Auto Body 2513 Main SI. 4,064 4,064 9627 Flower Stand 1415 3rd Ave. 88 88 9630 Sweetwater Auth. Office 505 Garrett Ave. 2,390 2.390 9637 Comm'I/Retail 1140 Broadway 9,950 9,950 9638 Boston Market 502 Broadway.. 0 0 9639 McDonald's Piayland 551 Telegraph Canyon 1,439 1,439 9641 Water Park Otay Rio Business Park 12.000 12,000 9642 Auto Salvage 880 Energy Way 0 0 9507 Comm'l/Office 688 Old Telegraph Cyn. Rd. 4.843 4.843 9510 Dr, Thru Food Add. 1009 Third Ave. 0 0 9633 Medical Office 215 3rd Ave. 576 576 9634 Medical Off. Remodel 384 H Sl 1.218 1,218 270,849 Total Square Footage: 699,578 . .) "...../' M:\HOMElPLANNING\GMOC\1996\PIPELlNE.WB1 ~õlJ/ 20-Nov-96 . .""~,._-"-_._......- -_._,-~--,--.--