Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1998/01/13 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Tuesday, January 13, 1998 Council Chambers 6:03 p.m. Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Councilmembers:Moot, Padilla (arrived at 6: 10 p.m.), Rindone, Salas, and Mayor Horton. ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ALSO PRESENT: City Manager, John D. Goss; City Attorney, John M. Kaheny; and City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. MOMENT OF SILENCE 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 9, 1997 MSC (Rindone/Moot) to approve the minutes of 12/9/97. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Padilla absent). 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: a. Presentation was made to Stephen Padilla, by Mayor Horton for his s~rvice as Mayor Pro Tern from December 1996 through December 1997. Continued from the meeting of 1/6/98. Presentation was made at the end of the meeting since Councilmember Padilla arrived late. b. Presentation of San Diego Business Journal's Who's Who award to Mayor Horton and Sweetwater Union High School District by Ted Owen, President and Publisher of the San Diego Business Journal. Continued from the meeting of 1/6/98. Item was cootinued to 2/10/98. c. Presentation of the Connect-ory by the East County Economic Development Council. Item was continued to 2/10/98. CONSENT CALENDAR (Item,' pulled: 5b, 7, and 8) BALANCE OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR OFFERED BY MAYOR HORTON, headings read, texts waived, passed and approved 5-0. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from ohservance of actions taken in Closed Session on 1/6/98, that there were no reportable actions which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. Per staff's recommendation, the letter was received and tìled, b. LeUer from Tris Hubbard, Member, Soutb Bay Family YMCA Board of Directors, requesting block grant funds to enable the YMCA to retain the Community Child Care Coordinator for a three month period ~_._--- Minutes January 13, 1998 Page 2 until funding can he obtained through a grant. Per staffs recommendation, if the YMCA cannot obtain funding for the Coordinator position, staff will work with the YMCA to research alternative funding soutces. . Tobi Webster, 156 E. Emerson Street, Chula Vista, 91910, requested the item be pulled. She was a child care provider. She stated the Community Child Care Coordinator was a very important position in the community. The funding for the Community Child Care Coordinator runs out at the end of the mooth. She requested that Council approve the funding to extend the position, and study the report that she delivered to Council. . Alma Romero, 881 Oaklawn Avenue, Chula Vista, 91910, representing Hispanic Child Care Providers urged Council to approve funding for this position. c. Letter from Melody Cernitz, Vice President, Friends of the Arts, requesting Council, by resolution, recognize the Friends of the Arts as a Local Arts Agency so that they can receive State and Federal grant funds. Per staffs recommendation, a resolution be scheduled for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting. 6. RESOLUTION 18858 APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING WAGES AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 2180, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997/98 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR - Negotiating teams representing the City and the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) , Local 2180, have reached agreement on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) covering tiscal year 1997/98. The proposed MOU was ratified by the IAFF membership. The cost of the contract is proposed to be appropriated from the unappropriated fund balance of the general fund. Per staff's recommendation, the resolution was approved 5-0. (Dave Byers, Management Chief Negotiator for IAFF) 4/5th's vute required. 7. RESOLUTION 18859 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH ESTRADA LAND PLANNING, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THEMTDBRIGHT-OF-W A Y BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT - Council has approved a concept master plan for the MTDB right-of-way beautilication project (C1P-LD- 106). In Septemher 1997, the Planning Department issued a Request for Proposal to obtain a qualified landscape architectural firm to provide consultant services. Services are needed to assist in the design, construction plan preparation and other items related to Phase 1 of the beautification project. Per staffs œcommendation, the resolution was approved 4-1. (Acting Director of Planning) Councilmember Rindone asked the following questions: 1. Who would be responsible for the estimated $25,000 per year maintenance costs. Garry Williams, Landscape Architect, stated that the responsibility of the maintenance costs would be the City. Councilmember Rindone stated that this was acceptable for the initial stage, but he informed staff there were some potential new monies that MTDB would be receiving for improving the beautitication of the line, and we may want to apply for on-going maintenance costs. 2. Was the completion date of March 1999 realistic and when would we begin the devdopment of the planning for Phase 2. Mr. Williams replied that staff was comfortable with that date. However, it was only for the planning; it did not include lighting and other fixtures. The planning for Phase 2 was dependeot upon receiviog additional funds for Phase 2. At this point, the only funding that we have are funds from MTDB. ..-"----- Minutes January 13, 1998 Page 3 Councilmember Rindone stated that MTDB is accessing some more TDA funds for future projects, close to $11 million should be available. He asked staff to make contact with MTDB to begin discussion for Phase 2. If we don't, the monies will go to other areas. * * * Item pulled by Counci1member Padilla who asked why didn't we go with the lowest bidder. E. Peter d' Ablaing, MTDB, member of the Selection Committee, stated that one of the reasons Estrada Land Planning was selected was because they have worked on previous MTDB projects. They were familiar with MTDB procedures witbin trolley corridors and were familiar with working with TEA funds which this project has. Based on the questions asked of all of the consultants. it came out that Estrada Land Planning was the most responsible bidder, and that is why they were selected. Councilmember Rindone stated he was familiar with the process that they used in the selection of consultants. Price was an important factor, but it was not the sole factor. He was convinced from staff's report that the most qualified landscape architectural firm has been selected. Unfortunately it was not the lowest, but sometimes the lowest price is not the cheapest. RESOLUTION 18859 OFFERED BY COUNCILMEMBER RINDONE, beading read, text waived, passed and approved 4-1 (Padilla no). 8. REPORT USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 TO FINANCE INFRASTRUCTURE - Recently, McMillin Otay Ranch and Otay Ranch Development requested the City to initiate proceedings for the establishment of Community Facilities Districts (CFDs), also known as Melia-RoDs Districts, pursuant to the "Melia-RoDs Community Facilities Act of 1982," to finance specific public improvements serving their proposed developments. Staff retained a consultant, Brown, Diven & Hentschke, based on their expertise and experience in working with the City and other agencies as bond counsel to prepare the report on the use of CFDs as a public financing mechanism with the City. The "Mello-Roos Act" requires that as a prerequisite for the use of CFDs. the City shall adopt a "statement of local goals and policies" concerning the use of the Act. Staff recommends Council accept the report and approve the resolution. (Director of Public Works) RESOLUTION 18860 ADOPTING THE CITY'S STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS MSUC (Horton/Rindone) to continue item to January 20, 1998. 9. REPORT REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (DIF) AND PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD) FEE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 - State Government Code Section 66000 requires local agencies assessing DIF fees to make available specified financial data to the public each tiscal year. It also requires that the local agency provide this information to the public for a minimum of fifteen days prior to reviewing the information at a public meding. Staff also chose to include for ease of reference and for the convenience of members of the public Parkland Acquisition and Development fees. Local agencies are also required to make findings every five years for any DIF tìmds æmaining unexpended that identify tbe purpose for tbe fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged. This year the City elected to make such findings for any funds remaining unexpended for tive or more years. Per staffs recommendation, the resolution was approved 5-0. (Director of Finance and Director of Public Works) --~-------_._-----_.~- Minutes January 13, 1998 Page 4 RESOLUTION 18861 MAKING FINDINGS THAT THE UNEXPENDED FUNDS IN THE VARIOUS DIF FUNDS ARE STILL NEEDED TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES FOR WHICH THE FEES WERE COLLECTED · · · END OF CONSENT CALENDAR' · . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 10. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A MODIFIED CITY GAMING PLAN, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 5.20 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TO ALLOW FOR: (1) FURTHER CONSOLIDATION OF CARDROOM LICENSES TO PERMIT A 24 TABLE CARDROOM; (2) CARDROOM OPERATIONS ON A 24 HOURS A DAY, 365 DAYS A YEAR BASIS; (3) ADDITIONAL TYPES OF GAMES; (4) REVISED CARDROOM LICENSE TRANSFER POLICIES; AND (5) RELATED AMENDMENTS - On 2/20/96, Council approved a Gaming Plan which made a number of changes to the City's previous Gaming Ordinance. Tnis was the result of a request made by Harvey Souza of the Village Club Cardroom. The new Gaming Plan allowed additional games to be played subject to certain restrictions. The new Gaming Plan also made modifications to the hours of operation, days of operation, maximum bets, and per table charges. Mr. Souza is now asking for additional changes to the City Ordinance and Gaming Plan. Staff recommended that Council: (A) Deny the request and continue to follow the Gaming Plan Instituted in 1996; or (B) Modify the Gaming Plan to include applicant's requested chaoges. (City Maoager aod Chief of Police) RESOLUTION 18862 AMENDING THE CITY GAMING PLAN TO INCLUDE A SECURITY ELEMENT AND DENYING REQUEST FOR FURTHER MODIFICATION OF THE CITY GAMING PLAN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 5.20 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE Richard Emerson, Police Chief, stated that the applicant has asked for eight changes to the current Gaming Plan: 1) permit the playing of all card games permitted by the Division of Gambliog Control; 2) consolidate two twelve- table cardroom licenses; 3) waive the provision of the three year card club operation when moving from a Class I to a Class II operation; 4) allow a twenty-four operation versus the current operating hours of closing from 4:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.; 5) increase the number of players from 9 to 11 at each table; 6) not segregate the Class I and Class II tables; 7) have the drinking of intoxicating liquors controlled by the City's land use regulation versus being prohibited by the Gaming Plan; and 8) add a security element to the Gaming Plan. Statf supports adding the security element. Additionally, there was a request from Haig Kelegian to transfer ownership on the other two licenses currently owned by Commerce Casino, changing those into his name and ultimately consolidate to a 24 table cardroom. One of staffs concerns was how does this affect our family-oriented community. At this point in time, the cardroom is viewed by the Police as a "mom and pop" operation that was not creating a criminal problem. Staff believes that we should make the moditication to the Gaming Plan as far as the security issues, but leave the operation as it is. Glen Googins, Deputy City Attorney, clarified the basic options as follows: 1) To deny the reyuested èhanges and make only those technical changes that staff has developed in order to comply with some State law requirements which were recently adopted. 2) To approve some or all of the substantive modifications. It is staff s recommendation that if Council decided to proceed with some or all of the suhstantive changes, that approval be done in concept, and direct staff to work out some of the more detailed language that staff would desire to the actual Gaming Plan. The applicant has proposed specific changes which staff would request additional time to review ordinances and jurisdictions with larger cardroorns operations to look more closely at recent affective State regulations which impose certain kinds of regulations and to analyze revenues, security, transfer, land use, etc. to make sure the Council's and Police Chief's concerns might be properly addressed. ---------- ~.-.-,--- Minutes Januaty 13, 1998 Page 5 This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. Addressing Council were: . Paul Pfingst, San Diego, District Attorney, stated that throughout the unincorporated areas of the County, cardrooms are illegal, and have been so for a long period of time. In most cities inside the County, cardrooms are illegal. In the areas where cardrooms are legal, it is because they are generally grandfathered in from a time where there were many cardrooms, and city councils have taken the position that to deprive someone of their business would be unfair, so they have grandfathered those businesses to stay within families. From time-to-time those cardroom operators who have been grandfathered have made requests to expand the nature of the operation and go from a "mom and pop" operation to large corporate operation. In 1992, the County Police Chiefs and Sheriffs Association were asked to study the matter. They crafted a policy on hehalf of County law eoforcement expressed in a letter of August 6, 1992 and addressed to Mayor O'Connor discussing the feelings about this issue. He requested that this letter be made a part of the record. There were two issues: 1) traditional law enforcement which includes money laundering, bookmaking, robbery, and various other things that come along with gambling; and 2) the undo influence that large scale gambling can have on elected political officials with the lobbying that takes place. Corporate participation and large scale accommodations present a very real threat to the integrity of the political processes of a community and to the law enforcement community. He was opposed to these consolidations if they present the level of consolidation that poses that risk to a community. He admitted that he had not studied Chula Vista's proposal in depth. Mayor Horton asked him to explain why he would think it was more beneficial to leave the status quo having Harvey Souza own one license for 8 to 12 and having Chula Vista Bay Club, an outside owner, operate a 12 table cardroom versus having combined ownership of 24 tables under one ownership with somebody who has a history of being an outstanding citizen. Why would this be detrimental to our community_ Me. Pfingst responded that the most difficult question presented to city councils is where do you divide lines. Sometimes when a business acquires another business, it doesn't become just the sum assets of both businesses, it can have a significantly greater value to other people who may want to purchase an interest in that Club, and it becomes a much more valuable asset. It also has the capability of doing some other things that the small businesses do not have. One of the capabilities is because there is a large volume of dollars running through the same person, the opportunity for money laundering and other types of things are more present. The other part is, there is a history that corporate ownership presents some very significant problems. This should be explored in great detail. Whenever you vote, these institutions will be back. If you say no, they will still be hack. 11' you say 25, next will be 35, then 45 etc. This is the history of a process of incrementalism. It is a small process by institutional participants who at the time are well known to us and are good positive community memhers, but this is a long-term decision for the long term effort, and we don't know who will own these licenses in the future. Mayor Horton asked if he had to make the decision to accept our existing ordinance with a known individual who is from the conununity, raised in the community, and has been a wonderful corporate citizen; and you have permits for another twelve tables from a group who may have questionable ties versus consolidating with Me. Souza into a known commodity, would you still keep the status quo. Recognizing that we could have the Chula Vista Bay Club come into Chula Vista and operate a cardroom. Mr. ptingst responded he would keep the status quo. The scaling issue is a much more signitîcant issue in the long run for purposes of the public integrity of the political processes and also for purposes of volumes of money being able to run through any type of gambling institutions. Councilmember Moot stated that there has been some fairly large-scaled gamhling on the Indian reservations for some time in San Diego County. What could we do about this type of gamhling when it exists in such large scales within such short proximity to Chula Vista. Mr. Pfingst stated that Indian reservations are in federal jurisdiction. Local cardrooms will not be able to compete with the Indian gambling places. The "mom and pop" operations have a different nitch than large-type casinos. The two will never be equal. _'___._._m_.._ Minutes January 13, 1998 Page 6 · Mark Jones, 52 "G" Street, Chula Vista, 91910, stated he was "pro" gaming. In response to the question on mooey laundering and the effect on the 10diao tribes, he stated that Indian tribes were extremely sensitive to money laundering. He works at the casino at Sycuan. They track player's actions throughout the day. All the money that is recorded is required by the federal government under Title 31. There is no money laundering in the casino itself. · Tina Marie Whitten, 52 "G" Street, Cbula Vista, 91910, stated she was "pro" gaming and was a qualified license holder. She felt the gaming licenses should be available to all citizeos, perhaps by a bidding process. Twelve tables were too small of an operation. She felt these licenses were being held to restrict competition. They have also denied the City of potential revenue. She wanted the City Council to make sure all applicants were on equal footing and deny the transfer of the two licenses held by the Commerce Club. She also wanted a gaming license and wanted to know how she could obtain one. · Haig Kelegian, 121 Brooks Street, Oceanside, representing Ocean's Eleven Casino Cardroom in Oceanside, stated he took a nm-down club that had many problems, moved it to a new location, built a new facility, increased the size of the business, and increased the size of revenues to the City. They have been in operation for a year with twenty-five tables. His was not a corporate entity that Mr. Souza was proposing. Councilmemher Salas asked Mr. Kelegian if he would pay $1 million for this license even if the Council did not expand the gambling ordinance. Mr. Kelegian responded yes. · Petet Watty, 81 Second Avenue, Chula Vista, 91910, stated he supported staffs tecommeodatioo to deny the request for modification to the City's Gaming Plan. · Rod Davis, 46 Center Street, Chula Vista, 91910, felt that the State was going to put card rooms in every fair ground that it owns in the State; that bill was already in front of the Legislature. This was not a question of whether you give Mr. Souza and Mr. Kelegian the opportunity to do business and control it locally, its a question of whether you give it to them this year or the State gives it to them next year, and the State makes the million dollars worth ofincome. He felt this was an opportunity to do something good for the City. If you don't like what the cardroom does, you can pull the license. He felt this did oot have anything to do with whether we have 24 tables, but had to do with whether we cootrol it locally or whether the State controls it aod takes the money. · Barbara McAlister, 857 Crest Drive, Chula Vista, 91910, spoke against having any change or increase in the gambling activities in the City. · B. L. Seaton, 952 Fourtb Avenue, Cbula Vista, 91910, stated he was against gambling and strongly recommended that this not be approved. · Michael Green, attorney representing Harvey Souza and the Village Club Cardroom, requested that staff tell the Council that the applicant withdrew its request regarding the so call "monopoly". Mr. Googins stated the request that had heen made earlier by Village Cardroom that no further licenses be issued was subsequently withdrawn. However, the proposal would consolidate all the existing issued licenses. There is the potential for the City under its existing Gaming Plan to issue an additional license ahove the four existing licenses once the population of Chula Vista exceeds 160,000 people. The Gaming Plan was drafted in such a way that the issuance of additional licenses would be at the City Council's discretion. · Deonis Youog, 719 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, 91910, stated he has known Mr. Souza for 20 years. He felt that knowing him and his integrity, he would rather have all of the gaming played io this town under his control then have another cardroom pop up somewhere else which would increase the problems with law enforcement. --- -- ---'-~-'----"-'._.- -------~_.- Minutes January 13, 1998 Page 7 · Harvey Souza, 429 Broadway, Chula Vista, 91910, applicant and owner of Village Club Cardroom, expressed he had two issues to bring up: I) he felt through his application that he was doing what the City wanted to have done for the future which was to hold down the growth of the cardrooms by not allowing the corporate card rooms to come here. A corporate cardroom explored the possibilities, but they have decided that Chula Vista never did want them. By the consolidation of the card rooms, it would hold the amount of tables in the town to the level that Council has ratified; and 2) the other issues are requested for the economics of providing a bigger club which would be nicer with all the security that the police department has indicated they wanted. The State has required them as of January 1, 1998 to step up all fonnsof security and all forms of monitoring whether it be monetary or on-site surveillance. They will be in control of that and the permitting of it, and they will be sending agents out from the State. Some of the things alluded to such as crime, skimming, etc. are basically an integrity issue on an individual. He felt that he has met that in the thirty-five years he has heen the owner of the cardroom. Councilmemher Moot asked, under the consolidation, who was going to own the cluh. · Michael Green, attorney representing the applicant, stated that what was going to happen, now that we know that limited liability companies are not pennitted to own card clubs in California, they are going to end up with a limited partnership which Mr. Souza is a genera' partner. The limited partner would be Mr. Kelegian, and he would have no say by law as a limited partner. If, for some reason, the Commerce Club comes back in the contract, they would also come back in as a limited partner. Not only does Mr. Souza have 51 %, he will be the one managing the partnership, and by law limited partners have no right to have input into the management. · Cberyl Cox, 647 Windsor Circle, Cbula Vista, 91910, stated the City Council has the authority not only to look at who holds a license, but has the authority to look at the site where that license may be granted. Several years ago, the Council looked at this community as a family-oriented community and an 8 table license when merged with an 8 table license would mean a 12 table license. That happened twice, so that is why we have 12 and 12. The question that Mr. Souza poses is, lets put that math aside because we do have a much larger city and we are looking at a population that could play card games at an institution that holds 24 tables. Mr. Souza will not allow anybody in his cardroom if they are under 21. You can get into an Indian casino if you are 18. Mr. Souza's new location cannot be near churches, schools, or residents. Mr. Souza is in this for his business and to perpetuate 53 years of solid ownership of a business that has been good for Chula V ista, and has not levied the kind of pressure upon its political figures that we might fear should We be looking at institutions of 180-200 tables. You could get Mr. Souza to sign right now that the 51 % ownership of a consolidated license is his 51 % ownership and he is in control. He will not be back to ask for any other extension. She asked the Council to allow him to continue his business in a way in which he could provide the kind of supervision which the police chief is concerned about and that we can reward Mr. ptïngst with knowing that in Chula Vista we do it right. There being no one else indicating a desire to address the Council, the public hearing was Closed. Mayor Horton stated her tirst inclination was to support the request from M r. Souza, because he was an outstanding citizen with an impeccable reputation who gives back to the community and provides funding for our Boys and Girls Clubs and for other social events and services. At first she did not See a problem in consolidating licenses, because we would have the same number of card tables in the community whether we let this one known commodity consolidate the license and have full control of the gambling. History has shown us that he is above board and does not allow the criminal element into his club. However, she was not the educated person in this industry, therefore, she felt she had to go by tbe advise given to het by the Police Chief and the District Attoroey. Therefore, she will regretfully support staffs recommendation. Councilmember Padilla stated that the real issue was not about individual ownership or members of the community; the real question was about whether We should change our rules on gaming establishments and the ordinance that we have in Chula Vista. Gaming is a particular type of enterprise that has historically been easy pickings by people who are quite sophisticated at stealing other people's money. The problem with that pottmtial intluence is that in most of those cases, it is at a level that frequently the owner was not even aware of what is occurring in their own business. The question before us is what kind of community do we want to be. Although the "mom and pop" operations have a good history, and the applicant has a good personal history, was not the question. The question Minutes January 13, 1998 Page 8 was what potential risk is the Council going to allow. To move in the direction of being known as a community that has large cardroom establishments was not something he felt was appropriate for Chula Vista. When he campaigned for office, he made it clear at that time that he would not support the expansion of card rooms or gaming in the City; he still will not. MAYOR HORTON OFFERED RESOLUTION 18862, heading read, text waived. Councilmember Rindone stated he felt that there was no question about Mr. Souza's reputation, and he believed his intention was genuine in efforts of fighting off other people who have made a raid at him to buy his license and sell it off and consolidation. This issue has come before Council at least three times since he has been on the Council. Councils have looked at this issue and have determined that in this community our intent to keep it as a family- owned business and operation and not to expand it. He was willing to continue to have the business that has been operating successfully 53 years continue. Cardrooms are the biggest source of gambling revenue in the State that exceeds horse racing and the lottery. This is a thriving industry, and we don't want this in Chula Vista. He concurred with staff's recommendation to r~iect all provisions of the proposal except for the security provision. He would also like to amend this by directing staff to bring back the provision about adding a fifth or more licenses as the population increases. He did not want to see this in the current gaming plan. He wanted to see that we don't have an opportunity to upscale to a tïfth license. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: MSUC (RindonelPadilla) to include directing staff to come back to eliminate the provisions for expansion of the number of licenses based upon population, * * Council recessed at 7:42 p.m. and reconvened at 7:55 p.m. All members of the Council were present. * * 11. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF SEVEN MAJOR AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT - Council previously had work sessions to discuss and develop City-wide ptiorities. On 9/11/97, Council completed a final review of the priorities and identitïed the seven major areas of improvement. Council received public comment and input on the proposed seven issues at a public hearing on 10/21/97 and determined that additional public comment was necessary prior to tinal adoption. Council members have made 13 talks to community groups, and reached out to the community in general for input via phone, mail, fax, and the Internet. In addition, articles have appeared in the local paper and the Quarterly. Per staff's recommendation, Council accepted public testimony on the seven major areas of improvement and continued the public hearing to 1/20/98 at 6:00 p.m. (Budget Maoager and Public 1nformatioo Coordinator) This being the time and place as advertised, the puhlic hearing was opened. Addressing Council expressing opposition to SR-125 were: · Fred Sams, P. O. Box 214, Bonita, 91908-0214. · Joe Silva, 6566 San Miguel Road, Bonita · Gil Oakes, 5631 Watercrest, Bonita, representing Preserve San Diego Bay · Allison Rolfe, P. O. Box 7745, San Diego, 92107, representing Southwest Center for Biological Diversity · Marianne Greene, P. O. Box 632974, San Diego, 92103 · E. V. Burley, 6500 San Miguel Road, Bonita · John Hammond, 3012 Anderson Street, Bonita, representing Sweetwater Community Planning Group · Kevin Kidd, 5144 Sunnyside Drive · Harriet Taylor, 3142 Orchard Hill Road, Bonita, 91902, representing Presorve South Bay · John Taylor, 3142 Orchard Hill Road, Bonita, 91902, representing Presorve South Bay Minutes Jaouary 13, 1998 Page 9 · Ramon A. Urnzon, 5732 Sweetwatet Road, Bonita, 91902 · Patricia Householder, 8475 Aenida Angulia No.5, Bonita · Nancy Gatt, 3400 Randy Lane, Chula Vista, 91910, representing Preserve South Bay · Gretchen Burkey, 4807 Del Prado, representing Preserve South Bay Those addressing other issues were: · Marco Cortes, 1196 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista. 91911, Chair, Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee and member of the Otay Valley Regional Park Citizens Advisory Committee, expressed that the Otay Valley Road PAC has been receiving some notices from some of the business owners in that aœa ahout the traftic congestion with the amphitheater and the Water Park. They will be requesting staff and Council for better traffic management between the Water Park, City, and the Amphitheater. The Regional Park CAC would like to see some of the progress that we have been making there and get moœ funds allocated through the State and City. Since the incorporation, there have been some significant capital improvements, but he felt there was a need for more ClP projects in the Montgomery area such as a Cultural Arts Center or something that will complement the Regional Park near Main Street; he would like to see this added to the list of priorities. He was Suppottive of SR-125. If the route does happen, he felt it would..diminish the impact .of tr41ffic.m his community . · Walter Fisher, P. O. Box 3666, Chula Vista, member of the Otay Valley Road PAC and member of GMOC, felt the top priority should be the economic health and growth of the community in providing jobs for the citizens. Secondly, you have to watch the Otay Ranch project. He has heard that the main flaw in the Otay Ranch plan is the fact it was developed with the idea that you would have one owner in perpetuity. We no longer have that. He has also heard that the words Otay Ranch Plan and Amendment have now become permanently linked and there is a desire to change the vision that was developed over a number of years. One of the priorities should be to maintain the vision and not let the quality that was built into the pf(~ject initially be diluted. He felt that SR-125 was beyond Couocil's scope of stopping, although he agreed it should be. MS (Horton/Rindone) to continue the item to the January 20th meeting. Councilmember Moot stated that one of the presentations not on the list was the one he gave to the Chamher of Commerce. He was disappointed that some of the people who gave input at that pœsentation did not come to the hearing. One thing that was thrown out that made some sense was that Council ought to consider a process in how the City makes decisions. Several of the people in the Chamber said that you can have all these great priorities and goals, but until you change the way business is done in the City, it will be very hard to make any of these priorities a reality. We need to improve the way we make decisions, the quickness with which they are made, and how they are coordinated. We may want to be open to a general notion that we need to actualize these priorities, and we need to put a process in place by which we can let all this work be something other than a nice report. A suggestion was that each councilmember adopt one of these priorities and have it he their responsibility to see that this priority was acted on and followed through. Another suggestion was that as part of the budget process, we have a section in the budget to identify how these priorities are retlected in the budget itself. VOTE ON MOTION: Approved unanimously 5-0. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS None submitted. ACTION ITEMS 12. REPORT REQUEST FOR AN ALL-WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF HIDDEN VISTA DRIVE AND WOODHOUSE A VENUE - In July 1997, staff received a petition asking if a way could be fouod ~ '_-~..--.,_.-...--_.~.._--~.._-_.._--_._. Minutes January 13, 1998 Page 10 to discourage traffic from using Hidden Vista Drive as a short cut and requesting all-way stops be installed on Hidden Vista Drive at Woodhouse Avenue and at Wind rose Way. Staff recommends Council accept the report and deny the request for an all-way stop. (Director of Public Works) Continued from the meeting 01' 12/16/97. Addressing Council urging installation of a stop sign at Woodhouse and Hidden Vista Drive were: · Daniel Ballez, 521 Woodhouse Avenue, ChuIa Vista, 91910 · Rod Ballard, 516 Chantel Court, Chula Vista, 91910 · Leslie Woldt, 455 Windrose Way, Chula Vista, 91910 · Caryn Hoffman, 455 Lawn View Drive, Chula Vista, 91910 · Tara Hoffman, 20 Richmond Park Court, Chula Vista, 91910 · Bert Urhano, 485 Lawn View Drive, Chula Vista, 91910 · Jim Plate!, 455 Lawn View Drive, Chula Vista, 91910 Councilmember PadiIJa stated his comfort level would increase if there was a sign there. Not every intersection that doesn't meet the warrants have both a park and a school. This does, so he felt this was a case where we should support the Safety Conunission's recommendation. MSUC (HortonlPadilla) that we install an all-way stop sign at the intersection of Woodhouse Avenue and Hidden Vista Drive. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (iteInS 5e, 7, and 8 were pulled. Minutes reflect the published agenda order) OTHER BUSINESS 13. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTfS) a. Scheduling of meetings. February 5, 1998 at 7:00 p.m., a meeting has been set to meet jointly with the Sweetwater High School District; they want to host it at their Board Room. Thursday, January 22, 1998, at 5:30 p.m. a workshop was planned on the Otay River Valley to be held in the Council Conference Room. Because only two of the five councilrnembers were able to attend, the meeting was cancelled. 14. MA YOR'S REPORTfS) a. Ratification of appointments: Conunission on Aging, Susan Carrillo (to fill vacancy created by Commissioner Scrivener, whose term expires June 30, 1999); and Dtay Valley Road Project Area Committee, Raul Tellez (to fiB vacancy created by Commissioner Doria, whose term expires June 30, 2000). MSUC (Horton/Rindone) to ratify Susan Carrillo to the Commission on Aging. MSUC (Horton/Rindone) to ratify Raul Tellez to the Otay Valley Road PAC. Minutes January 13, 1998 Page 11 15. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Padilla a. Discussion of traftìc concerns near Park V iew Elementary School. Councilmember Padilla recommended that staff should reschedule the meeting with the dementary school board as soon as possible, and he requested that this issue be placed on that agenda. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:57 p.m. ~7t~ Beverly A. Authelet, CMCIAAE City Clerk -"------- . .._-----"------- - -.._.~-_.- "I declare tlndèf penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Chula Vista in tha Office of the City Clerk and that I posted this AgendalNoti~e on the Bulletin Board at Tuesday, January 13, 1998 the Public er ¡ces Building yo/n.. Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. DATED. 1'1 SIGNED . Public Services Building REVISED Regular Meeting of the City of Chula Vista City Council CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Moot _, Padilla _. Rindone _' Salas _' and Mayor Horton _. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. MOMENT OF SILENCE 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 9, 1997 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: a. Presentation to Mayor Pro Tern, Stephen Padilla, by Mayor Horton for his service from December 1996 through December 1997. Continued from the meeting of 1/6/98. b. Presentation of San Diego Business Journal's Who's Who awards to Mayor Horton and Sweetwater Union High School District by Ted Owen, President and Publisher of the San Diego Business Journal. Continued from the meeting of 1/6/98. c. Presentation of the COlU1ect-ory by the East County Economic Development Council. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 9) The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in Closed Session on 1/6/98, that there were no reportable actions which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. It is recommended that the letter be received and tiled. b. Letter from Tris Hubbard, Member, South Bay Family YMCA Board of Directors, requesting block grant funds to enable the YMCA to retain the Community Child Care Coordinator for a three month period until funding can be obtained through a grant. It is recommended that if the YMCA cannot obtain funding for the Coordinator position, staff work with the YMCA to research alternative funding sources. ---~-~- ----- ~_._-,,_. Agenda -2- January 13, 1998 c. Letter from Melody Cernitz, Vice President, Friends of the Arts, requesting Council, by resolution, recognize the Friends of the Arts as a Local Arts Agency so that they can receive State and Federal grant funds. It is recommended that such a resolution be scheduled for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting. 6. RESOLUTION 18858 APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING WAGES AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 2180, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997/98 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR - Negotiating teams representing the City and the International Association of Firelighters (lAFF), Local 2180, have reached agreement on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOD) covering fiscal year 1997/98. Tbe proposed MOU was ratified by the 1AFF membersbip. Tbe cost of the contract is proposed to be appropriated from the uoappropriated fund balance of the general fund. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Dave Byers, Management Chief Negotiator for IAFF) 4/5th's vote required. 7. RESOLUTION 18859 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH ESTRADA LAND PLANNING, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE MTDB RIGHT-OF- WAY BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT - Council has approved a concept master plan for the MTDB right-of-way beautification project (CIP-LD-106). In September 1997, the Planning Department issued a Request for Proposal to obtain a qualified landscape architectural firm to provide consultant services. Services are needed to assist in the design, construction plan preparation and other items related to Phase 1 of the beautification project. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Acting Director of Planning) 8. REPORT USE OF THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 TO FINANCE INFRASTRUCTURE - Recently, McMillin Otay Ranch and Otay Ranch Development requested the City to initiate proceedings for the establishment of Community Facilities Districts (CFDs), also known as Mello- Roos Districts, pursuant to the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," to finance specific public improvements serving their proposed developments. Staff retained a consultant, Brown, Diven & Hentschke, based on their expertise and experience in working with the City and other agencies as bond counsel to prepare the report on the use of CFDs as a public financing mechanism with the City. The "Mello-Roos Act" requires that as a prerequisite for the use of CFDs. the City shall adopt a "statement of local goals and policies" concerning the use of the Act. Staff recommends Council accept the report and approve the resolution. (Director of Public Works) RESOLUTION 18860 ADOPTING THE CITY'S STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS --- .'-'~ Agenda -3- January 13, 1998 9. REPORT REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (DIF) AND PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD) FEE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 - State Government Code Section 66000 requires local agencies assessing DlF fees to make available specified tinancial data to the public each fiscal year. It also requires that the local agency provide this information to the public for a minimum of fifteen days prior to reviewing the information at a public meeting. Staff also chose to include for ease of reference and for the convenience of members of the public Parkland Acquisition and Development fees. Local agencies are also required to make findings every five years for any DIF funds remaining unexpended that identify the purpose for the fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged. This year the City elected to make such findings for any funds remaining unexpended for five or more years. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Finance and Director of Public Works) RESOLUTION 18861 MAKING FINDINGS THAT THE UNEXPENDED FUNDS IN THE VARIOUS DIF FUNDS ARE STILL NEEDED TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES FOR WHICH THE FEES WERE COLLECTED · · · END OF CONSENT CALENDAR · · · ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the generaL public to address the City Council on any subject mailer within the Council's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State Law, however, generally prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, pLease compLete the "Request to Speak Under OraL Communications Fonn" availabLe in the Lobby and submit it to the City CLerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, pLease give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by Law. If you wish to speak to any item, pLease fiLL out the "Request to Speak Fonn" availabLe in the Lobby and submit it to the City CLerk prior to the meeting. 10. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A MODIFIED CITY GAMING PLAN, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 5.20 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TO ALLOW FOR: (1) FURTHER CONSOLIDATION OF CARDROOM LICENSES TO PERMIT A 24 TABLE CARDROOM; (2) CARDROOM OPERATIONS ON A 24 HOURS A DAY, 365 DAYS A YEAR BASIS; (3) ADDITIONAL TYPES OF GAMES; (4) REVISED CARDROOM LICENSE TRANSFER POLICIES; AND (5) RELATED AMENDMENTS - On 2120/96, Council approved a Gaming Plan which made a number of changes to the City's previous Gaming Ordinance. This was the result of a request made by Mr. Harvey Souza of the Village Club Cardroom. The new Gaming Plan allowed additional games to be played subject to certain restrictions. The new Gaming Plan also made modifications to the hours of operation. days of operation, maximum bets, and per table charges. Mr. Souza is now asking for additional changes to the City Ordinance and Gaming Plan. Staff recommends Council: (A) Deny the request and continue to follow the Gaming Plan instituted in 1996; or (B) Modify the Gaming Plan to include applicant's requested changes. (City Manager and Chief of Police) RESOLUTION 18862 AMENDING THE CITY GAMING PLAN TO INCLUDE A SECURITY ELEMENT AND DENYING REQUEST FOR FURTHER MODIFICATION OF THE CITY GAMING PLAN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 5.20 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ________.n.__'._._.._...__ _____.___ Agenda -4- January 13, 1998 11. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF SEVEN MAJOR AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT - Council pteviously had work sessions to discuss and develop City-wide priorities. On 9/11/97, Council completed a final review of the priorities and identified the seven major areas of improvement. Council received public comment and input on the proposed seven issues at a public hearing on 10/21/97 and determined that additional public comment was necessary prior to final adoption. Councilmembers have made 13 talks to community groups, and reached out to the community in general for input via phone, mail, fax, and the Internet. In addition, articles have appeared in the local paper and the Quarterly. Staff recommends Council accept public testimony on the seven major areas of improvement and continue the public hearing to 1/20/98 at 6:00 p.m. (Budget Manager aod Public Information Coordinator) BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one of the City's Boards, Commissions, and/or Committees. None submitted. ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individUlllly by the Council and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak" fonn avaiwble in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 12. REPORT REQUEST FOR AN ALL-WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF HIDDEN VISTA DRIVE AND WOODHOUSE AVENUE - In July 1997, staff received a petition asking if a way could be found to discourage traffic from using Hidden Vista Drive as a short cut and requesting all-way stops be installed on Hidden Vista Drive at Woodhouse Avenue and at Windrose Way. Staff recommends Council accept the report and deny the request for an all-way stop. (Director of Public Works) Continued from the meeting of 12/16/97. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers. OTHER BUSINESS 13. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) a. Scheduling of meetings. -~'''-"-~_._.__._-,~,------.- Agenda -5- January 13, 1998 14. MAYOR'S REPORT(S) a. Ratification of appointments: Commission on Aging - Susan Carrillo (to fill vacancy created by Commissioner Scrivener, whose term expires June 3D, 1999); and Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee - Raul Tellez (to fill vacancy created by Commissioner Doria, whose term expires June 30, 2000). 15. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmemher Padilla a. Discussion of traffic concerns near Park View Elementary School. ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) a special closed sessionlmeeting on Wednesday, January 14, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, Administration Building, thence to a special closed session/meeting on Thursday, January 15, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, Administration Building, and thence to the regular City Council meeting on January 20, 1998 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A special joint meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following tbe City Council meeting. - -~ ----- -- ----------~--_._-- -. declere "lnder penelty of perjury thet I em employed by the City of Chula Vista in the Office of the City Clerk and that I posted Tuesday, January 13, 1998 this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin Bosrd at Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. the Public ~tc~U¡¡ding a,"1 e\ 8"1. .. I' on Pubtic Services Building (immediately following the City <WJ¡PJ¡Ao~ 'J SIGNED [J ~o;;:- ft Citv of Chula Vista Citv Council CLOSED SESSION AGENDA Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. Unless the City Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are permitted by lflw to be the subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the interests of the City. The Council is required by lflw to return to open session, issue any reports of final action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session, reports of final action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office. 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING: 1. Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 · City of Chula Vista v. EastLake and Pacific Scene. · Wolfe v. City of Chula Vista. · Griffin v. City of Chula Vista. 2. Significant explosure to Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(b) Letter dated 10/22/97 from John Yeager (Attorney with Hewitt & McGuire) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 . City Manager CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 . Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, POA, IAFF, Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. Employee organization: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) and Western Council of Engineers (WCE), Police Officers Association (POA) and International Association of Fire Fighters (lAFF). Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. 2. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION /.------., : 'I, ~- ) ,- ~/ '- --« -:,/'"\.... ~ ____/'" :/ :i;'" January 8, 1998 TO: The Honorable Mayor and city counci~ FROM: John D. Goss, city Manager0Ct ~ ..-"? SUBJECT: City council Meeting of January 13, 1998 This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular city Council meeting of Tuesday, January 13, 1998. Comments regarding the Written Communications are as follows: Sa. This is a letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in . Closed Session on 1/6/98, there were no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED. Sb. This is a letter from Tris Hubbard, South Bay YMCA Board of Directors, requesting block grant funds to enable the YMCA to retain the Community Child Care Coordinator for a three month period until funding can be obtained through a grant. All CDBG funds for 1997-98 have been budgeted already and funds remaining from program year 1996-97 are recommended to be used for a Cold Weather She I ter Voucher program. (See attached memo from the Director of Community Development. ) IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT IF THE YMCA CANNOT OBTAIN FUNDING FOR THE COORDINATOR POSITION, STAFF WORK WITH THE YMCA TO RESEARCH ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES. 5c. This is a letter from Melody Cernitz, Vice President, Friends of the Arts, requesting that Council adopt a resolution recognizing the Friends of the Arts as a Local Arts Agency so that they can receive State and Federal grant funds. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT SUCH A RESOLUTION BE SCHEDULED FOR ADOPTION AT A SUBSEQUENT COUNCIL MEETING. JDG:mab ---- ----,._._~-,~.".__....- MEMORANDUM January 8, 1998 TO: John D. Goss, City Manager C?' FROM: Chris Salomone, Community Development Director SUBJECT: South Bay Family YMCA Funding Request . On December 17, 1997 a letter was received by the Mayor's Office from South Bay Family YMCA requesting Community Development Block Grant funds to·· continue funding a Community Child Care Coordinator position. The grant which enabled the South Bay Family YMCA to hire the Coordinator expired on December 31, 1997 and the YMCA is working to find short-term financial assistance in the amount of $9,697 to retain the position. According to Tina Williams of YMCA, the Coordinator has continued to work in the position and will remain until January 30, 1998. The Child Care Coordinator is responsible for delivery of new child care slots for children of welfare recipients who are required to be in job training and employment as mandated by welfare reform. The Coordinator is also responsible for training new child care providers and develops an area wide strategy to address projected child care needs. The YMCA request is eligible for CDBG funding and there is evidence that the services provided by the Child Care Coordinator are important in addressing a high priority community need. Staff researched if there were existing CDBG funds available to provide assistance to South Bay Family YMCA. Staff was able to identify existing CDBG funds from program year 1996-97, however, these funds have been identified to be used for a request received by the County of San Diego for a Cold Weather Shelter Voucher program. The request, in the amount of $8,318, was received on November 12, 1997. Staff will be forwarding an Agenda Statement .which recommends Council approval to fund the Cold Weather Shelter Voucher program for the meeting of January 20, 1998. For the current program year 1997-98, all CDBG funds have been budgeted. Staff recommends funding the Cold Weather Shelter Voucher program due to the emergency need to house over 100 homeless families from the extreme weather conditions predicted for the winter. In the event the Coordinator position is not funded, the position will be eliminated until further funding can be obtained. The request from the South Bay Family YMCA to continue funding for the Child Care Coordinator position merits consideration and staff recommends further analysis to research alternative funding sources. . - "__' _,______.0___....'__._ ___"_,. ~~~ :---~:-: ~"'t.""t.~ ""'"~""-~ -::....- - "- CllY OF CHUIA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY A TIORNEY Date: January 7, 1998 To: The Honoreble Heyor end city ~' ~ From: John M. Kaheny, City Attorney ~ Re: Report Regarding Actions Tak in Closed Session for the Meeting of 1/6/98 The city council met in Closed Session on 1/6/98 to discuss Public Employee Appointment: City Manager and labor negotiations. The Redevelopment Agency met in Closed Session on 1/6/98 to discuss Conference with Real Property Negotiator: Potential sale of Redevelopment Property-John Moores and Larry Lucchino and Potential Purchase of Easement: SDG&E. The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the City Attorney participated, that there were no reportable actions which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. JMK: 19k C:\lt\clossess.no <.--ça- - / 276 FOURTH AVENUE' CHULA VISTA· CALIFORNIA 91910 . (619) 691-5037 . FAX (619) 585-5612 ·f/.; PosI<:.o:niIrøAet)dadP..- _ __.__.___...._ __ _____..._.M.__ ,........-.-----..."-----. ..--. "._---._._...._------~-_._--_._-~._..__._._-,._- . .'..'.'--'.' -- -----_.._..__._._-----~ y~ 50 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California Y 1 Y 10 16, 1997 Telephone ¡6191 4~~·g.15.t SOUTH BAY FAMILY YMCA December FAX (619)4::!~-4.. .J2 Shirley Horton, Mayor ('")('") ~ =i=i City of Chula Vista -<-< ::0 ('")0 276 Fourth Avenue í ,...." ~ /'11 M1('") (') Chula Vista, CA 91910 ;c:z: - IT! ::O:c ...,,... ...., - o:Þ ð < Dear Mayor Horton: ~:s IT! - 0 -V> ('")-., f.J rT1:t'~ - As you are aware our community leaders have joined together to provide an organized effort to meet the mandates of welfare reform. One of the major components of the welfare reform program is the need to provide child care programs for welfare recipients who are returning to the work force. We currently have approximately 7,000 children in child care in the City of Chula Vista and we anticipate the need to add 14,000 new slots for children of welfare recipients who will be in job training and employment. The Chula Vista Human Services Council organized the 6 to 6 child care committee in April of this year. Tina Williams accepted the challenge of chairing this extremely important committee in spite of her major responsibilities of managing a growing YMCA program and overseeing the construction of the new YMCA on Paseo Magda. Fortunately, Tina was able to secure a small grant which enabled the YMCA to hire Sylvia Cunningham in August as a Community Child Care Coordinator. Sylvia serves on the Chula Vista Child Care Commission and has done an outstanding job of researching our communities child care programs and developed an analysis of our projected child care needs. Unfortunately the grant which enabled the YMCA to hire Sylvia ends December 31, 1997. The YMCA is looking for short tel'm financial assistance to retain Sylvia in her current position. Tina has submitted an RFP for Child Care funding and Sylvia's position has been written into that grant proposal, however it will be several months before the grant could be funded. Would there be any possibility of receiving block grant funds enabling the YMCA to retain Sylvia for another 3 month period? Sylvia's salary for a 3 month period, including fringe benefits = ~.~~{.¡,¡) WRlnEr.! COMMiJ!\!ICA Ti~ () \~c.-.: ~ ~Et<T .TheSo"thB'YF""'IYYMCA"de"'~;;!.lheq",bIYoth"manbt'''dIO."<lP,"' /' J /3 l'Y A f'KYCled ~¿...., , p e I'tahze their fullest polenuaJ as ctuldren of God through development of the Spin!. mmd and body LLJA ?~ . ...___ .. · would be $9,697. Sylvia, in her capacity as Community Child Care Coordinator, provides a valuable service to the needy children and families of Chula Vista. The process of locating new child care facilities, and training child care managers and workers will be a monumental task. It is imperative to our community that we need to proceed as rapidly as we can to open and staff child care facilities. Your consideration to help keep Sylvia on the job will be appreciated. Sincerely, /.~s ~J::::: Tris bard, ember South Bay Family YMCA Board of Directors 5b --2 Community Child Care Report To: Chula Vista City Council Members From: Sylvia Cunningham Community Child Care Coordinator 6 to 6 Task Force RE: Community Child Care Report Date: 1/13/98 Background of Community Child Care Project Chula Vista's current Child care system was assessed through funding from the San Diego County's Gain Program and 6 to 6 task force of the Human Services Council. The projects goal was to assess current availability, quantity, and quality of child care in Chula Vista. Parent needs were also to addressed in regards to location of services, costs of child care and training of providers. Project Tasks The project began in April 1997 with a community forum held at Cook Elementary School attended by over 100 parents in the Chula Vista Area. The theme of the forum was "Caring for Chula Vista's Children". Parents were asked for their opinions on Child Care needs and concerns. Parents in the Chula Vista Elementary School District were also surveyed last spring, in regards to their child care needs. The results were tabulated by "Building Healthier Futures" , Assessment and Planning office. The only zip code available at this time is 91910. Due to staff shortages the remaining five zip codes have not been tabulated. ~::"þ " :; A Community Child Care Coordinator was hired to map all existing child care, interview over 300 child care providers on current statistics of their child care facilities, and train new and established providers. The Community Child Care Coordinator, implemented support services for new providers to Family Day Care, 10 established Small Day Care providers wbo have applied for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Large Family Day Care Home and coordinated Family Day Care Training's in our local community. Results of the Child Care Survey The telephone survey and mapping project were made possible with technical assistance from YMCA CHILD CARE RESOURCE SERVICE AND COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING. Statistics on the telepbone survey and mapping project can be reviewed on figures 1-5 at the end of this report. 91910 1. Limited Supply of Infant - Toddler Care 2. Limited supply of subsidized child care centers in 91910 3. Significantly lower population of Family Day care Homes in 91910 4. Large number of For - Profit Child Care Centers in 91910 5. 3,120.48 children on AFDC as of 2/3/97 ß-f 91911 1. Limited supply of Infant - Toddler care 2. 9 subsidized Child care centers 3. 125 Licensed Family Day Care Homes. 4. 5 For Profit Child Care Centers 5. 4,991.58 children on AFDC as of 2/3/97 The remaining zip codes of Chula Vista (91913,91914,91915) and Bonita(91902) do not appear to be as limited in their choices for child care. Since some of these areas are still new their population of child care sites is lower than 91910 and 91911. Parents in these areas were in agreement with parents from other zip codes in regards to the safety and quality of child care in their neighborhoods. Future Projections The community child care coordinator will continue to assist 10 identified candidates for Home day care expansion. Three area workshops will be held locally over the next three months for Family Day Care Providers on topics that promote Professionalism in the Field of Early Childhood Education. For additional information in regards to the child care report , contact: Sylvia Cunningham Community Child Care Coordinator c/o South Bay Family YMCA 422-8354 5b<ß ,,-..-....- ............, .,. . ...~~,. ~................~ .~-~----- -~. .--- - Community Child Care Project Childcare Vacancy Chart Figure 1 Zip Code Familv Dav Subsidized Non-Profit For-Profit Before/After l : Care Home! Childcare Childcare Childcare School Car Tota~ Ug1iiio~' 33 0, 36 19¡-----¡¡- 88- ¡ 91911 I 50 0 0 6 0 56: 91913_.?___ 0 0 0 0 --I 2 l 91914 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 91915 0 0 0 I 0 0 ----O! 91902 0 ! 0 63! 0 0 63: ___ Total 85 T 0 99 25 0 209 --: Childcare Capacity Levels Figure 2 i Zio Code Familv Dm¡ Subsidized Non-Profit For-Profit :sefore/After ' Care Home Childcare Childcare Childcare choal Car Total I 91910 128 163 244 644 802 88 i 91911 740 490 178 84 93/200 1981 i I 91913 116 0: 0 162 83 1785 I 91914 8 0 0 0 0 8 91915 18 0 0 0 0 18 91902 128 i 24 127 120 160 I 559 __ Total 1138 I 677 : 549 1010 1338! 4712 Childcare Sites in Chula Vista Figure3 I Zi Code 'Famil D IS~bsidized Non-Profit For-Profit I , - i___ Care Home~ Childcare I Childcare Childcare Total 91910.~ 64 ___~~_-----g-n - 11 .- 111 98 ---e1911- I- 125 9 t 2 , 5- 5 146~ _n__ _ ___+--__ __-----¡--___ _----,-___" - - --------I 91913 15 0: 1 1 In _-.l_ '_ 18 __________ _____~._. __u,..__ ..______ , r -- -- . ---..j 919~n_ 1 __ O~____ 0 0 _ -l 0_.1_ 1 91915.lnn_+ 0 0 1__J__..J5_ un 91902 12 1 1 2 2 18 Total 220 13 13 20 20 286 Statistics ptovided by YMCA Childcare Resource Service and Community Care Licensing. ~tjþ ~? Cormmmity Child Care Project Subsidized Childcare Waiting List In Chuta Vista Figure 4 -~,- ¡ 1---- I Pr ram Names , In! 1 Tad I Preschool I ECS Southbay Headstart 200 i Chula Vista Elm. State Preschool 172 - I Park Village Center 30 50 20 : I . Child Development Associates I ----...- _.,..,.__.~- Total' 30 u~1 20 I Statistics provided by YMCA Childcare Resource Service and Commuoity Care Licensing. 5b~? RECEIVED / VI ŒC 16 A9':53 , December 10,1997 / / %ITY OF CHULA VISTA / ! fry CLERK'S OFFICE ""-'---.' Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, The Friends of the Arts is a local, all-volunteer organization devoted to the promotion, protection, and preservation of the arts in the City of Chula Vista. First established in 1994, the Friends have grown from a core unit of artists to a current membership of more than 80. Mem- bers are from all walks of life with the same interest - promoting the arts in our community. Board of Directors: Our long-term goal is to establish and operate a multi-purpose arts Jess Valenzuela, complex in Chula Vista. A space where all artists from diverse disci- President plines may study, practice, and display their talents and work. It will also provide a place where citizens of all ages may enjoy the arts. Melody Cernitz, This community endeavor will encourage and perpetuate our local, Vice Ptesident multi-cultural diversity through the arts. Gloria Galbraith, The Friends has embarked on the following activities: develop fund- Treasurer ing resources, establish study programs, facilitate art projects, and Linda Boutin, establish a communication network in the Chula Vista art community. Secretary The Friends of the Arts is requesting that the City of Chula Vista help in this venture. Robert E. Clement It is requested that the City Council by resolution recognize the Susan Mendes Friends of the Arts as a Local Arts Agency (LAA). This City Council Pamela Buchan action will position the Friends of the Arts to receive state and federal grant funds. Josie Kane A package of information describing the Friends of the Arts, its history and future goals is enclosed. We will be calling to schedule a meeting with you to answer any questions you may have, or you may contact me at 427-1102. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Friends of the Arts ~ _ P. O. Box 121815 , -f~ Chula Vista, CA 91912 ~ ()-' 619/691-5273 Melody Cernitz, Vice President The Friends of the Arts functions as an onservancy to promote, protect, and preserve all fine and cultural arts in the South Bay communities. Cc : (:C Ct CD-n<: I /c-j d-1 ¿; l.1Qro. Y Ci Cl~ éi+¡ A~rncj _...,.,__/"'1., ~__::::::,_ ____. .__'n__.__.__._', COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item_~ Meeting Date 01/13/98 ITEM TITLE: Resolution / g'F.::5~lution approving Memorandum of Understanding concerning wages and other terms and conditions of employment with the International Association of Fire Fighters Local 2180, for FY 1997-98 and appropriating funds therefore. SUBMITTED BY: Dave Byers, Management Chief Negotiator for IAF~ (9(t:- REVIEWED BY: City Manager ftl1(; (4/5ths Vote: YeslNo_) Negotiating teams representing the City and International Association of Firefighters, Local 2180 (IAFF) have reached agreement on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) covering FY 1997- 98. The proposed MOU was ratified by the IAFF membership. The major changes to the terms and conditions are outlined in this report. The cost of the contract is proposed to be appropriated from the unappropriated fund balance of the general fund. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving the FY 1997-98 Memorandum of Understanding with IAFF and appropriate funding for the contract trom the unappropriated fund balance of the general fund. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable DISCUSSION: The one-year MOU with IAFF for FY 1997-98 includes the following changes from the FY 1996-97 MOU: 1. Wal!es: a 1-% pay increase effective July 4, 1997. 2. Mileal!e: increase the reimbursement rate by 5 cents per mile. The top rate will be $0.31 per mile, the rate allowed by the IRS. 3. Retirement: the City will provide the Fourth Level Survivor benefits. 4. 4850 Lanl!ual!e: the MOU language was changed so that, while IAFF members still may not extend their disability retirement by using sick leave after their year of 4850 leave, they do not lose all the sick leave they have accumulated. In addition, in those very unusual cases where a member will be able to return to duty, but the rehabilitation or healing process takes longer than a year, the City Manager may approve the use of sick leave until the employee can return to work. 5. Bilinl!Ual Pay: IAFF members must complete a Bilingual Performance Evaluation on a biannual basis; The testing material will take into account the requirements of the Fire Service; and the maximum 50 % level of IAFF members being eligible to receive Bilingual pay is eliminated. The current percentage of lAFF members receiving Bilingual pay is far below 50 %. 6. Term and Effect: All time limits for negotiations for FY 1998-99 will be moved up 30 days. ~~J Page 2, Item___ Meeting Date 01/07 /98 7. Staffine: No Firefighter vacancies will be filled during the Term and Effect of the MOU unless the number of Suppression employees falls below that required for minimum staffing of 22 per shift. This will permit the study of the concept of Constant Minimum Staffing as opposed to the current Supplemental Staffing. This will not adversely impact the provision of Safety Services to the public. The City will appropriate $7,500 to be used to help staff conduct the study. FISCAL IMP ACT: The cost of this Memorandum of Understanding is within the guidelines established by City Council. The total cost ofthe package is $59,300. Note: The proposed MOU is on file and available for public review in the City Clerk's office D:\WINWORDIIAFF\A1I3 MOU FY1997-98.doc & ~ .2.. RESOLUTION NO. ¡I¿r¿r~~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING WAGES AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 2180, FOR FY 1997/98 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR WHEREAS, the Management Negotiation Team representing the city Manager of the City of Chula Vista, acting for and on behalf of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, have heretofore met and conferred with Local 2180, International Association of Fire Fighters, an organization representing members of the Chula vista Fire Department from Fire Fighter up through the rank of Fire Captain, in accordance with the provisions of section 3500 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the Memorandum of Understanding jointly prepared by said parties as a result of meeting and conferring in good faith has been presented to the City Council and is on file in the office of the City Clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Wages and Other Terms and Conditions of Employment with the International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 2180, for FY 1997/98, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $59,300 be appropriated from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund to cover the cost of the MOU. Presented by Approved as to form by Dave Byers, Management Chief Negotiator for IAFF c:\rs\fire.MOU ~~3 ".- -,,-_._-_.~~ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 7 Item Meeting Date 01113/98 ITEM TITLE: Resolution) g g-fZprOVing an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Estrada Land Planning, Inc r landscape architectural services for the Metropolitan Transit Dis . t Bard Right-of-Way Beautification Project (CIP-LD-106~ SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning .' REVIEWED BY: City Manager (; ¡),- fJ (4/Sths Vote: Yes _ No X) f..J The City Council has approved a concept master plan for the MTDB right-of-way that provides for landscape enhancement along the 4 mile right-of-way corridor. The right-of-way averages 150 feet in width and runs between the most southerly and most northerly city boundaries and encompasses approximately 72 acres. The master plan discusses the need for beautifying this corridor through landscaping and other improvements and provides an outline and phasing program for implementing improvements per the concept plan. In September of 1997, Phase I of this project was started with the issuance of a Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit interested landscape architectural firms for their services to prepare plans, specifications, cost estimates, and other project related items for Phase 1. This report discusses the consultant selection process, the scope of work and provides a recommendation for Council authorization to hire a consultant for Phase 1. As determined in earlier reports, both staff and City Council have concluded that this project will have a positive affect on local users of the trolley, residents of Chula Vista and international travelers travelling from San Diego to Mexico. Through the transformation of this transportation corridor, riders and Chula Vista's residents will experience the corridor as an attractive landscape feature adjacent to interstate 5. RECOMMENDATION: That the Council approve the Resolution and authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement with Estrada Land Planning, Inc. for consultant services for the MTDB right-of-way beautification project (CIP-LD-I06). BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A DISCUSSION: In September 1997, the Planning Department issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to obtain a qualified landscape architectural firm to provide consultant services on the (Al13 -contract.estrada] 1 7~) Item Meeting Date 01113/98 MTDB beautification project. Services are needed to assist in the design, construction plan preparation, writing of specifications and preparation of cosl estimates as related to Phase 1 of the MTDB beautification project. Consultant Selection Process Council Policy #102-03 which outlines procedures for consultant selection, was followed in the selection of this consultant. The department advertised in the San Diego Dailv Transcript and over 23 finns were given an RFP for their consideration. Ultimately, the Department received five replies (all San Diego County firms) to the RFP. To evaluate the proposals and select a consultant for council recommendation, a selection committee was fonned. Made up of five members and comprised of representatives from the Parks and Recreation Department, Engineering Department, the Planning Department and metropolitan transit development board, the committee was charged with" scoring" each proposal and interviewing each finn. To assist the selection committee in scoring each firm, a rating sheet was prepared and specific criteria used. The criteria used was: 1. Related project experience. 10 points weight 2. Firm's ability and capacity to perform the work. 5 points weight 3. Grasp of the project requirements. 10 points weight 4. Method to be used to fulfill the required services. 15 points weight 5. Management approach for technical requirements. 10 points weight 6. Time schedule planned for this project. 10 points weight 7. Use of consultants that may work on the project. 10 points weight 8. Firm's experience and methods used for: .Budgeting and financial controls. .Determining fee and compensation. 10 points weight 9. Quality of oral presentation 5 points weight The committee members were instructed to rate each finn, in each category on a scale of 1 to 5: 5 being the highest and 1 the lowest. Each criteria had a weight between 5 and 15 points. Their rating number was then multiplied by the weighted points to achieve a "score" for each criteria. The total points for each of the 4 firms, listed below in the table is a compilation of their final scores. (5 raters x each criteria score x weighted number = final score for each finn) . The following are each firms score: [AU3 -contract,estrada] 2 7~;¿ Item Meeting Date 01113/98 Architect Score Rank Estrada Land Planning, Inc. 2042.5 1 Schmidt Design Group, Inc. 1940.0 2 DeLorenzo Incorporated 1827.5 3 DNA, Inc. 1817.0 4 Nowell & Associates 1442.5 5 At the conclusion of this process Estrada Land Planning, Inc. was judged the most qualified and desirable firm. The committee was impressed with Estrada because of their extensive experience, available resources, the continuity the firm could bring to the project because of their current involvement in the San Y sidro trolley facility, the firms excellent references, their interpersonal skills noted in the interview process, their community-teamwork philosophy, and their knowledge of design standards and guidelines of MTDB and knowledge of the proposed project. Estrada's references spoke very highly of the firm and unequivocally stated the firms qualifications and ability to complete work in a timely manner and within budget. In addition, Estrada Land Planning was the prime consultant providing site planning and landscape architectural design on the Bayfront trolley station and the Southwestern College Transit Center. Estrada will hold a public meeting using an interactive approach to involve the public. Simulated computer images will be prepared for use in this meeting. This community workshop will involve the landscape architect and design team and city staff. This information will be used as a basis to begin the design development phase. It is important to note that Estrada Land Planning, Inc. toured the site and evaluated the opportunities and constraints of the project prior to interviewing with the selection committee. Conversely, some of the other firms interviewed did not take time to make a site visit to understand the project's parameters. The Department believes that all five firms were qualified to perform the required consultant services. It was a very difficult choice to recommend one firm to the Council; however on the basis that Estrada has demonstrated competence and qualifications and will provide services at a fair and reasonable cost, the selection committee ranked Estrada Land Planning number one. [AI13 -contract.estrada] 3 7-3 Item Meeting Date 01113/98 SCODe of Work: Phase I - Design Confirmation - will include: 1. Reconnaissance and Survev The landscape architect will provide a survey of the site by walking the project area with city staff and riding the trolley to discuss the project. 2. Site analvsis Dlan The project consultant will provide the city with a plan showing opportunities of the project area as well as constraints. Additionally the analysis plan will define planting areas and prioritize those areas to remain within the available monies of Phase 1. 4. PreDare conceDtual Dlan The project architect will prepare for the city a colored presentation plan, in elevations, sections as sketches. Information from the site analysis plan will be inserted into the plan, such as plant locations and areas prioritized. 5. Public meeting The services will include facilitation of one citizen input workshop meeting. The consultant will explain the design and goals to the citizens as well as explaining the proposed improvements. If necessary the concept plan will be revised based on citizens input. SCODe of Work: Phase 2 - Construction Documents - will include: 1. Preliminary Submittal Three preliminary sets of plans, specifications and cost estimates of completion shall be submitted to the City for plan checking. 2. Plans. SDecifications. Cost Estimates The consultant will provide one complete set of original specifications and one original set of full size (24" x 36") photo mylars. All plans and specifications will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to acceptance. Detailed final cost estimates will be provided to the City for review and acceptance. In the event that the construction bids exceed the project budget by 10% or more, the consultant will revise the construction drawings so the project can be constructed to the City's satisfaction within the funds available. There will be no extra charge to the City for these revisions. A disc in autocad format will also be provided to the city. [AI13 -contract.estrada] 4 7-'-1 Item Meeting Date 01/13/98 The time schedule for the design confirmation and construction document preparation phase(s) is estimated to be 15 weeks. The date for completion of all consultant services is April 30, 1997. The consultant will deliver the services in two primary components: (1) Design Confirmation and (2) Construction Documents. Cost of the Consultant Based on negotiation guidelines outline in the Municipal Code (Chapter 2.56 - Purchasing System, 2.56.230 - Consultants Selection Process, Section B.4. - Negotiating a Price determined to be fair and reasonable), the total contract cost of $36,895 includes all the components of the scope of work described above and meets all guidelines. Bids of Other RFP Respondents In order to compare the proposed contract price to the other firm's responses, the following is provided: FIRM FEE The Schmidt Design Group, Inc. $41,030 ONA Incorporated $39,493 Estrada Land Planning, Inc. $36,895 Nowell & Associates $34,400 DeLorenzo Incorporated $26,500 It should be noted that the selection committee did not select the firm with the lowest fee, for the following reasons; 1. The guidelines outlined in Chapter 2.56 - Consultants Selection Process, Section B.4, requires that a consultants fee be "fair and reasonable". Based on staff's cost estimate of $40,000 to provide the services outlined in the RFP, the selection committee was uncertain of the firms ability to perform at a cost so much lower than staff's estimate and believed it was not reasonable. [All3 -contract.estrada] 5 7~-Š Item Meeting Date 01/13/98 2. Estrada scored the highest based on the selection criteria. Delorenzo scored third. It would have been hard to justify not selecting the highest score solely because of fee. Particularly when the fee was not a selection criteria. 3. The MTDB representative on the selection committee felt comfortable with the selection of Estrada and did not want to base their selection on the lowest fee. Most of the funds for Phase 1 are provided by MTDB. It should be noted that every firm was notified by phone of the final selection and no objections to the selection committees choice was expressed. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the contract for design and architectural services is $36,895. Sufficient funds are appropriated and available in the MTDB right-of-way beautification - Phase 1 account, 600-6000, LD 106, to pay for these services (1997-98). Funding sources for this account are from MTDB's, ICETEA and Billboard Reserve funds, $400,000 and $54,000 respectfully. Phase I focuses on landscaping only (no hardscape or lighting) for the full 4-mile right-of-way endorsed by Council Reso. 18628. The project budget proposed for the FY 1997- 98 CIP process includes $40,000 for design, $335,000 for construction and $25,000 for general administration, totally $454,000. Design will be completed in the first quarter of FY 1998/99. Construction will take place during the second and third quarters of FY 1998/99. It should be noted that there are associated maintenance costs associated with the new landscaping, estimated at $25,000 per year for Phase 1 improvements. The exact cost however, is unknown until contract documents are developed. Attachments - "A" - Agreement Resolution [A113 -contract.estrada] 6 7/Þ ---- --- RESOLUTION NO. /%8'../;;9 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND ESTRADA LAND PLANNING. INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE MTDB RIGHT-OF-WAY BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council has an approved comprehensive master plan that when implemented will beautify the Metropolitan Transit Development Board right of-way corridor within the City; and WHEREAS, a project has been created that will implement this master plan and will be a cooperative effort between the City and the Metropolitan Transit Development Board and is envisioned to beautify the corridor through landscape enhancement; and WHEREAS, the project will encompass the entire length of the corridor and will be implemented in phases, Phase 1 is limited in scope to contract documents for planting and irrigation; and WHEREAS, the City and the Metropolitan Transit Development Board on May 17, 1997, entered into an agreement to implement Phase 1; and WHEREAS, Phase 1 will be implemented by the City through the City's Capital Improvement Project process (#LD-106) and is funded through MTDB's 1993-4 TEA funding and will cost $454,000 and includes final design, construction documents, implementation, general administration and project contingencies; and WHEREAS, the project necessitates the hiring of a consultant, and on August 29, 1997 the preparation and advertisement of a request for proposal to solicit interested and qualified landscape estimates and construction documents for Phase 1 was completed; and WHEREAS, the City received responses from five architectural firms providing proposals of interest, and, in following Council Policy on the selection of a consultant, a Selection Committee was appointed by the City Manager to review each proposal, interview and provide a recommendation to council of the most qualified firm; and WHEREAS, as a result of this selection process, Estrada Land Planning, Inc. was determined to be the most qualified and most responsible firm to provide contractual services to design Phase 1; and WHEREAS, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to City within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve an agreement with ESTRADA LAND PLANNING, INC. for the professional services for the MTDB Right-of-Way Beautification Project, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the 7-7 office of the City Clerk as Document No. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chura Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by ~.~ ~ Kenneth G. Lee John M. Kaheny Acting Director of Planning City Attorney H:\HOME\PLANNING\MTDB\RESOS (January 13, 1998] 7~zr Parties and Recital Page(s) Agreement between City of Chula Vista and Estrada Land Planning, Inc. for Landscape Architectural Services This agreement ( "Agreement") , dated for the purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 1 is between the City-related entity as is indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 2, as such ("City") , whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 4, as Consultant, whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 5, and whose place of business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 6 ( "Consul tant" ) , and is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals WHEREAS, the City Council has an approved comprehensive master plan that when implemented will beautify the Metropolitan Transit Development Board right of-way corridor within the City; and WHEREAS, a project has been created that will implement this master plan and will be a cooperative effort between the City and the Metropolitan Transit Development Board and is envisioned to beautify the corridor through landscape enhancement; and WHEREAS, the project will encompass the entire length of the corridor and will be implemented in phases, Phase 1 is limited in scope to contract documents for planting and irrigation; and WHEREAS, the City and the Metropolitan Transit Development Board on May 17th entered into an agreement to implement Phase 1; and Page 1 7~9 WHEREAS, Phase 1 will be implemented by the City through the City's Capital Improvement Project process (#LD-106) and is funded through MTDB's 1993-4 TEA funding and will cost $454,000 and includes final design, construction documents, implementation, general administration and project contingencies; and WHEREAS, the project necessitates the hiring of a consultant, and on August 29, 1997 the preparation and advertisement of a request for proposal to solicit interested and qualified landscape estimates and construction documents for Phase 1 was completed; and WHEREAS, the City received responses from five architectural firms providing proposals of interest, and, in following Council Policy on the selection of a consultant, a Selection Committee was appointed by the City Manager to review each proposal, interview and provide a recommendation to council of the most , qualified firm; and WHEREAS, as a result of this selection process, Estrada Land Planning, Inc. was determined to be the most qualified and most responsible firm to provide contractual services to design Phase l' and , WHEREAS, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to City within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; (End of Recitals. Next Page starts Obligatory Provisions.) Page 2 7~/(} ,._____n__._______.____ Obligatory provisions Pages NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do hereby mutually agree as follows: l. Consultant's Duties A. General Duties Consultant shall perform all of the services described on the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, entitled "General Duties" . B. Scope-of-Work and Schedule In the process of performing and delivering said "General Dutiesll , Consultant shall also perform all of the services described in Exhibit A, Paragraph B, entitled "Scope-of-Work and Schedule" , not inconsistent with the General Duties, according to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph B, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph B, within the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence of this Agreement. The General Duties and the work and deliverables required in the Scope-of-Work and Schedule shall be herein referred to as the "Defined Services". Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times indicated does not, except at the option of the City, operate to terminate this Agreement. C. Reductions in Scope-of-Work City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time reduce the Defined Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with said reduction. D. Additional Services In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set forth, City may require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related to the Defined Services ( "Additional Services"), and upon doing so in writing, if they are within the scope of services offered by Consultant, Consultant shall perform same on a time and materials basis at the rates set forth in the "Rate Schedule" in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11 (C) , unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed, Page 3 7~/1 '/v . -,_.._...._-_."-~ -,.",------- -- - ---- E. Standard of Care Consultant, in performing any Services under this Agreement, whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. F. Insurance Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and sub- consultants employed by it in connection with the services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following insurance coverage, in the following categories, and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval of the City: Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance. Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, combined single limit applied separately to each project away from premises owned or rented by Consultant, which names by endorsement the City and Applicant as Additional Insured, and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ( "Primary Coverage") , and which treats the employees of the City and Applicant in the same manner as members of the general public ("Cross-liability Coverage") . Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is included in the General Liability policy. G. Proof of Insurance Coverage. (1) Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance in a form approved by the City's Risk Manager, demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Additional Insured. Page 4 7-);2.. /2 I < ~ -- -------- -- ^-...,.......--.----... (2) Policy Endorsements Required. In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured Coverage, Primary Coverage and Cross-liability Coverage required under Consultant's Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy, Consultant shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Risk Manager. H. Security for Performance. (1) Performance Bond. In the event that Exhibit A, Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide a Performance Bond (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Performance Bond"), then Consultant shall provide to the City a performance bond by a surety and in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney which amount is indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Performance Bondll, in said Paragraph 19, Exhibit A. (2) Letter of Credit. In the event that Exhibit A, Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Letter of Credit"), then Consultant shall provide to the City an irrevocable letter of credit callable by the City at their unfettered discretion by submitting to the bank a letter, signed by the City Manager, stating that the Consultant is in breach of the terms of this Agreement. The letter of credit shall be issued by a bank, and be in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney which amount is indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Letter of Credit" , in said Paragraph 19, Exhibit A. (3) Other Security In the event that Exhibit A, Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide security other than a Performance Bond or a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Other Security"), then Consultant shall provide to the City such other security therein listed in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney. Page 5 7~/3 -- ----~-~..._._,.._--~_.~-"..._--~--_..- -- -- -~.__...._--.- 1. Business License Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to otherwise comply with Title 5 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 2 . Duties of the City A. Consultation and Cooperation City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose of reviewing the progress of the Defined Services and Schedule therein contained, and to provide direction and guidance to achieve the objectives of this Agreement. The City shall permit access to its office facilities, files and records by Consultant throughout the term of the agreement. In addition thereto, City agrees to provide the information, data, items and materials set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, and with the further understanding that delay in the provision of these materials beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a basis for the justifiable delay in the Consultant's performance of this Agreement. B. Compensation Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Consultant submitted to the City periodically as indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, but in no event more frequently than monthly, on the day of the period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, City shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consultant according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11, adjacent to the governing compensation relationship indicated by a "check-mark" next to the appropriate arrangement, subject to the requirements for retention set forth in Paragraph 19 of Exhibit A, and shall compensate Consultant for out of pocket expenses as provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 12. All billings submitted by Consultant shall contain sufficient information as to the propriety of the billing to permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper, and shall specifically contain the City's account number indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 18 (C) to be charged upon making such payment. 3 . Administration of Contract Each party designates the individuals ( "Contract Administrators" ) indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 13, as said Page 6 7---) r party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to represent them in the routine administration of this Agreement. 4. Term. This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all executory provisions hereof. 5. Liquidated Damages The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages Rate is provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14. It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the essence in the completion of this Agreement. It is difficult to estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in per- formance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a . reasonable amount to compensate for delay. Failure to complete the Defined Services within the allotted time period specified in this Agreement shall result in the following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess of the time specified for the completion of the respective work assignment or Deliverable, the consultant shall pay to the City, or have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14 ("Liquidated Damages Rate") . Time extensions for delays beyond the consultant's control, other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in writing to the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, prior to the expiration of the specified time. Extensions of time, when granted, will be based upon the effect of delays to the work and will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work unless it can be shown that such delays did or will delay the progress of the work. 6 . Financial Interests of Consultant A. Consultant is Designated as an FPPC Filer. If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 15, as an "FPPC filer", Consultant is deemed to be a "Consultant" for the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure provisions, and shall report economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 15 of Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney. Page 7 7//~ _ ______________ "_'0' _..___.__._.__~_m B. Decline to Participate. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Consultant's position to influence a governmental decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this Agreement. C. Search to Determine Economic Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant warrants and represents that Consultant has diligently conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's economic interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair political Practices Commission, and has determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with . Consultant's duties under this Agreement. D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act. E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Consultant learns of an economic interest of Consultant's which may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder. F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests. Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, ("Prohibited Interest"), other than as listed in Exhibit A, Paragraph 15. Page 8 7-/!" ._-"-- Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates in connection with Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter. Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. . 7 . Hold Harmless Consultant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the neglicent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant, or any agent or employee, subcontractors, in connection with the execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except' only for those claims arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, or employees. Consultants' indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant. S. Termination of Agreement for Cause If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Consultant's breach. Page 9 7/) 7 "-' --' -_.,.._..~. -.---.-..---. ..--...-. 9. Errors and Omissions In the event that the City Administrator determines that the Consultants' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than would have resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions, Consultant shall reimburse City for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this Agreement. 10. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein. 1l. Assignability The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of City. City hereby consents to the assignment of the portions of the Defined Services identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17 to the sub-consultants identified thereat as "Permitted Sub- consultants" . Page 10 7,¡g/ -- ------_._-_._"--_._."----~. 12. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. 13 . Independent Contractor City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. Therefore, City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax, and Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and shall hold the City harmless with regard thereto. 14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the. City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. Page 11 7~/~ -.-.-.-------.-- 15. Attorney's Fees Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including costs and attorney's fees. 16. Statement of Costs In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or participates in the preparation of a report or document in performing the Defined Services, Consultant shall include, or cause the inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document. 17. Miscellaneous A. Consultant not authorized to Represent City Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Consult- ant shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever. B. Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesperson If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 is marked, the Consultant and/or their principals is/are licensed with the State of California or some other state as a licensed real estate broker or salesperson. Otherwise, Consultant represents that neither Consultant, nor their principals are licensed real estate brokers or salespersons. C. Notices All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified herein as the places of business for each of the designated parties. D. Entire Agreement This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject Page 12 7/,2{) --_.~...._.~" matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought. E. Capacity of Parties Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement. F. Governing Law/Venue This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista. [end of page. next page is signature page.] Page 13 7--.2/ Signature Page to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and Estrada Land Planning, for Landscape Architectural Services for the M.T.D.B. landscape beautification project IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: Dated: , 19 City of Chula Vista - . by: Shirley Horton, Mayor Attest: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk Approved as to form: 0.-.--- ìV\ A1~ trt"- John M. Kaheny, City torney Dated: Estrada Land By: Steve da, President Exhibit List to Agreement (X) Exhibit A. Page 14 7 .-' .J-:J-. .- _.__.__.__._,-_._._~--- Exhibi t A to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and Estrada Land Planning, Inc. 1. Effective Date of Agreement: 2. City-Related Entity: (X) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California ( ) Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, a political subdivision of the State of California ( ) Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chula Vista, a ( ) Other: 3 . Place of Business for City: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 4. Consultant: Estrada Land Planning, Inc. 5 . Business Form of Consultant: ( ) Sole Proprietorship ( ) Partnership (X) Corporation 6 . Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Consultant: 85 Horton J;'laza, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92101 Voice Phone (619) 236-0143 Fax Phone (619) 236-0578 Page 15 7-c23 ~- -- -------~._~ 7. General Duties: Consultant shall prepare plans, specifications, cost estimates and any other project related item for a landscape, beautification project within the Metropolitan Transit Development Board light rail corridor of the City of Chula Vista. 8. Scope-of-Work and Schedule: A. Detailed Scope-of-Work: Four meetings with City staff throughout the project; to be scheduled by City staff. . Phase 1 (Design Confirmation) Contract effective date through January 30, 1998: (1) Reconnaissance and Survey of the project area; field visit - walking-riding trolley (consultant and city staff) . (2) Site analysis plan: showing opportunities and constraints. (3) Site analysis plan: defined planting subareas; prioritize planting areas. (4) Prepare conceptual plan: provide City six computer simulations; provide City colored presentation plans; (elevations, sections and sketches); indicates plant locations; and prioritize the locations. February 06, 1998: (5) Citizen input/workshop meeting: explain design goals and explain proposed improvements. (6) If necessary, revise concept plan. Phase 2 (Construction Documents) March 06, 1998: (1) 50% completion, Plan Review Submittal, 4 sets of bluelines. Page 16 7-o2i _.._m....___ April 03, 1998: (2) 90%- completion, Plan Review Submittal, 4 sets of bluelines. April 30, 1998: (3) 100%- completion, Plan Review Submittal, 4 sets of bluelines. (4) Final Plan Submittal, 24"X 36" photo blackline mylar(s); Disc in autocad format; Specification 8-1/2" XII" in wordperfect. (5) Final Cost Estimate Submittal. B. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services: (X) Same as Effective Date of Agreement ( ) Other: C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables: Deliverable No. 1: Four meetings with City staff, to be scheduled by City staff. Deliverable No. 2 : January 30, 1998 Deliverable No. 3 : February 06, 1998 Deliverable No. 4: March 06, 1998 Deliverable No. 5 : April 03, 1998 Deliverable No. 6 : April 30, 1998 D. Date for completion of all Consultant services: April 30, 1998 Page 17 7/.2~ - -- ~._-- -_..._._,~.- 9. Insurance Requirements: (X) Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance. ( ) Commercial General Liability Insurance: $1,000,000. ( ) Errors and Omissions insurance: None Required (if included in Commercial General Liability coverage) . (X) Errors and Omissions Insurance: $500,000 each claim/aggregate (not included in Commercial General Liability coverage) . (X) Business Automobile Liability Insurance, with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 for each accident. (X) Professional Liability Insurance. 10. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Consultant: Autocad format base information provided by the City. . 11. Compensation: A. ( ) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement. For performance of all of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or milestones or for the deliverables set forth below: Single Fixed Fee Amount: , payable as follows: Milestone or Event or Deliverable Amount or Percent of Fixed Fee ( ) 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances against the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for each given phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that phase has been paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest free loans which must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily completed. If the Phase is satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive credit against the compensation due for that phase. The retention amount or percentage set forth in Paragraph 19 is to be applied to each interim payment such that, at the end of the phase, the full retention has been held back from the compensation due for that phase. Percentage Page 18 7 ~;2? _._.._n__"_·__..__ of completion of a phase shall be assessed in the sole and unfettered discretion by the Contracts Administrator designated herein by the City, or such other person as the City Manager shall designate, but only upon such proof demanded by the City that has been provided, but in no event shall such interim advance payment be made unless the Contractor shall have represented in writing that said percentage of completion of the phase has been performed by the Contractor. The practice of making interim monthly advances shall not convert this agreement to a time and materials basis of payment. B. (X) Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement. For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defined Services by Consultant as are separately identified below, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth Consultant shall not commence Services under any Phase, and shall not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless City shall have issued a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase. Phase Fee for Said Phase Meetings $1,760.00 1. Design Confirmation $9,400.00 2 . Construction Documents 50% Submittal $10,020.00 90% Submittal $8,830.00 100% Submittal $4,885.00 ( ) 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances against the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for each given phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that phase has been paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest free loans which must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily completed. If the Phase is satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive Page 19 7~.2 7 . --,,~_.-,-, ,.~_.. ..'-'~'-----------"--'-'- credit against the compensation due for that phase. The retention amount or percentage set forth in Paragraph 19 is to be applied to each interim payment such that, at the end of the phase, the full retention has been held back from the compensation due for that phase. Percentage of completion of a phase shall be assessed in the sole and unfettered discretion by the Contracts Administrator designated herein by the City, or such other person as the City Manager shall designate, but only upon such proof demanded by the City that has been provided, but in no event shall such interim advance payment be made unless the Contractor shall have represented in writing that said percentage of completion of the phase has been performed by the Contractor. The practice of making interim monthly advances shall . not convert this agreement to a time and materials basis of payment. C. ( ) Hourly Rate Arrangement For performance of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay Consultant for the productive hours of time spent by Consultant in the performance of said Services, at the rates or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule hereinbelow according to the following terms and conditions: (1) ( ) Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials Arrangement Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and materials in excess of said Maximum Compensation amount, Consultant agrees that Consultant will perform all of the Defined Services herein required of Consultant for $ including all Materials, and other "reimbursable items" ( "Maximum Compensation") . (2) ( ) Limitation without Further Authorization on Time and Materials Arrangement At such time as Consultant shall have incurred time and materials equal to ("Authorization Limit"), Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and approved by the City. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional Services at Consultant's own cost and expense. Page 20 7~,22Y' -.-....- .. --- - -----_...._~.~.._.._-~--~-- Rate Schedule Category of Employee Hourly of Consultant Name Rate Prin. Land Arch/Proj. Man. Steve Estrada $125.00 Assoc. Land Architect Scott Molentin $ 95.00 Landscape Architect Mark Caro $ 70.00 Draft person Assigned by Consul. $ 55.00 Clerical Assigned by Consul. $ 35.00 ( ) Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services rendered after [month] , 1998, if delay in , providing services is caused by City. 12. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Consultant in the performance of services herein required, City shall pay Consultant at the rates or amounts set forth below: ( ) None, the compensation includes all costs. Cost or Rate ( ) Reports, not to exceed $ : ( ) Copies, not to exceed $ : ( ) Travel, not to exceed $ : (x) Printing, not to exceed $ 1,800: ( ) Postage, not to exceed $ : (X) Delivery, not to exceed $-2QQ: ( ) Long Distance Telephone Charges, not to exceed $ ( ) Other Actual Identifiable Direct Costs: , not to exceed $ : , not to exceed $ : 13 . Contract Administrators: City: Garry Williams, Planning Department, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, (619) 691-5098 Consultant: Steve Estrada, Estrada Land Planning, 85 Horton Plaza, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92101 Page 21 7~27 --".. 14. Liquidated Damages Rate: ( ) $ per day. ( ) Other: 15. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code: (X ) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer. ( ) FPPC Filer ( ) Category No. 1. Investments and sources of income. ( ) Category No. 2 . Interests in real property. . ( ) Category No. 3 . Investments, interest in real property and sources of income subject to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the department. ( ) Category No. 4. Investments in business entities and sources of income which engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property. ( ) Category No. 5. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula Vista (Redevelopment Agency) to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. ( ) Category No. G . Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the designated employee's department to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. ( ) Category No. 7. Business positions. ( ) List "Consultant Associates" interests in real property within 2 radial miles of Project Property, if any: Page 22 7~J¿J -._--- 16. ( ) Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman 17. Permitted Sub-consultants: 18. Bill Processing: A. Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time: ( ) Monthly ( ) Quarterly (X ) Other:By phase B. Day of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing: ( ) First of the Month ( ) 15th Day of each Month ( ) End of the Month (X ) Other: Completion of Phase C. City's Account Number: 600-6000-LD106 19. Security for Performance ( ) Performance Bond, $ ( ) Letter of Credit, $ ( ) Other Security: Type: Amount: $ ( ) Retention. If this space is checked, then notwithstanding other provisions to the contrary requiring the payment of compensation to the Consultant sooner, the City shall be entitled to retain, at their option, either the following "Retention Percentage" or "Retention Amount" until the City determines that the Retention Release Event, listed below, has occurred: ( ) Retention Percentage: % ( ) Retention Amount: $ - Retention Release Event: ( ) Completion of All Consultant Services ( ) Other: Page 23 7/3/ u·· ;/ - ---- ......---"" COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ltemL Meeting Date 1/13/98 ITEM TITLE: Report on the use of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 to finance infrastructure. Resolution / g.8',¿'¿:ìadopting the City of Chula Vista statement of goals and policies regarding the establishment of Community Facilities Districts SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work~~ 6'¡f... REVIEWED BY: City Manager .f .,., j\; (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX) Recently, McMillin Otay Ranch and atay Ranch Development requested the City to initiate proceedings for the establishment of Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) also known as Mello- Roos Districts, pursuant to the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" ("Mello-Roos Act"), to finance specific public improvements serving their proposed developments. Staff retained a consultant, Brown, Diven & Hentschke, based on their expertise and experience in working with the City and other agencies as bond counsel to prepare the enclosed report on the use of CFDs as a public financing mechanism within the City of Chula Vista. The "Mello-Roos Act" requires that as a prerequisite for the use of CFDs, the City shall adopt a "statement of local goals and policies" concerning the use of the Act. That document was also prepared by the consultant and reviewed by staff and developers. The approval of the proposed resolution will ratify the use of CFDs as a public financing mechanism for (1) the construction and/or acquisition of public infrastructure, and (2) the provision of authorized public services. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council: 1) accept the report on the use of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 to finance infrastructure, and 2) approve the resolution adopting the City of Chula Vista statement of goals and policies regarding the establishment of Community Facilities Districts. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Back~round Traditionally, developers have financed the public facilities (streets, utilities, parks, etc.) within their projects and included those costs in the price of the homes. The City has used the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" ("1913 Act") to form Assessment Districts (AD) to finance the construction and/or acquisition of backbone public infrastructure serving the major developments in Eastern Chula Vista. Under current Council policy the use of the 1913 Act is limited to financing major highways, utilities, and related facilities and not normal subdivision improvements. 2{/ / Ll.. Page 2, Item 2š Meeting Date 1/13/98 The recently enacted Proposition 218 places a number of restrictions on the use of "special benefit assessments" by local agencies to pay for the operation and maintenance of public improvements. These restrictions may not be applicable to CFDs, which levy a "special tax" and not an "assessment". On June 3, 1997, Council considered several alternatives ("1972 Landscaping & Lighting Act", CFDs, and Homeowner's Association) for funding the operation and maintenance of public landscaping improvements. In the past, "1972 Act" Assessment Districts had been formed to provide that necessary funding. At that meeting, because of the impacts of Proposition 218 on the "1972 Act" districts, Council indicated a preference for homeowner associations to maintain open space landscaping, but directed staff to utilize CFDs for the on-going operation and maintenance of public landscaping improvements in new developments when a homeowner association is not formed. The approval by Council of the proposed resolution will expand that authority one step further to permit use of CFDs to fund infrastructure costs. Historically, there has been a negative connotation associated with the name "Mello-Roos District". Some developers have been typically against the imposition of CFDs because of that connotation. While some cities have not used CFD's in the past, the trend seems to be reversing since the apparent turnaround in the real estate market and the passage of Proposition 218, which imposed severe limitations on AD fmancing. The current perception of the development community is that CFDs may be a better fmancial tool and adapt better to changes in development plans than ADs. The CFDs which currently exist within City's jurisdiction have been formed by the School Districts to fund the construction of new schools. The following discussion will describe the issues in more detail as to how and where the various financing districts have been and might be used in Chula Vista. It should be noted that at the August 20, 1996 public hearing on the Development Agreement for Baldwin Builders, a number of residents from the Paloma Master Planned Community in the City of San Marcos raised several complaints regarding the CFD formed to finance several public improvements for that development. These issues are discussed below in the section "Goals and Policies Regarding the Establishment of Community Facilities District". Recently, McMillin requested the City initiate proceedings for the establishment of a Community Facilities Districts (CFD) to fmance the construction and/or acquisition of public infrastructure necessary for the development of their property (approximately 1,031 acres) within the Otay Ranch. The facilities requested to be financed are grading, water mains, sewer trunk: lines, reclaimed water mains, curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscaping and pavement for selected arterials and collector streets. These roads include La Media Road, Birch Road, Eastlake Parkway, East Palomar Street and collector streets serving the project (see Attachment A). The bond sale has been estimated between $13 and $20 million. At the request of Otay Ranch Development, the City is currently conducting proceedings to form Assessment District 97-02, pursuant to the "1913 Act". This district would fmance the g"/.;J... Page 3, Item£ Meeting Date 1/13/98 acquisition of grading, water mains, sewer trunk lines, reclaimed water mains, curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscaping and pavement for selected arterials and collector streets serving Village One. These roads include Paseo Ranchero, East Palomar Street and Monarche Drive (see Attachment B). The bond sale has been estimated in approximately $14.5 million. The developer desires to complete the current" 1913 Act" proceedings because of time constraints, but has also expressed the intention to use CFDs for financing future public improvements within the Otay Ranch. Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 The" 1913 Act" is a fmancing mechanism which allows the financing of public infrastructure through the issuance of bonds, the repayment of which is made from assessment installments collected from the property owners with their property taxes. There is no direct cost to the City. The historical concept for the utilization of ADs has been limited to financing traditional public iII1Provements, i.e., sanitary sewer, water, streets and drainage, where it can be clearly demonstrated that the property receives a special, local and direct benefit from the improvements. The ultimate security behind the bonds would be the properties located within the district, lli1l the City's General Fund or its ability to tax property within its jurisdiction. The approval of Proposition 218, "The Right To Vote On Taxes Act" impacts the fonnation of "1913 Act" Assessment Districts, since the City has the burden to show (1) that parcels to be assessed receive a "special benefit", (2) that the amount of any assessment be limited to the special benefit received by the assessed property, and (3) that all publicly owned parcels specially benefitting from the improvements are included in the assessment of the overall costs. At the core of the issue regarding assessment districts are the definitions of "General Benefit" and "Special Benefit". A "General Benefit" is something which is available to the public without regard to their property, such as public libraries, fire and police protection, to name a few. A "Special Benefit" is defmed as a particular and distinct benefit, over and above general benefits to the public at large, received from the improvements being funded by the district (e.g., a collector street providing the main access to a subdivision). It should be noted that detennining special benefit or distinguishing between general and special benefit to properties is not an exact science. Additionally, there is no substantive judicial precedent which establishes a bright line test for distinguishing between general and special benefits. Proposition 218 only allows public agencies to assess for special benefits. Those special benefits are detennined by the Assessment Engineer and incorporated in the Engineer's Report, which is approved by Council prior to district formation. Benefitted public parcels, such as fire stations, libraries, parks and school sites are not exempt and may be assessed. Prior to the passage of Prop 218, in a lawsuit the challenging party had the burden of proof to show that the fees and assessments were not legal. Proposition 218 shifts the burden onto the local government to prove that the fees and assessment are legal. New" 1913 Act" districts would also be subject to the majority protest and notification requirements of Proposition 218. These ?:3 - --"---,-_.__.._------- Page 4, Item~ Meeting Date 1/13/98 requirements should not pose any difficulty, since it is the landowner/developer who is requesting to subdivide the property. There would be no cost to the City for this additional processing needed to form a district because all formation costs are paid for by the developer/applicant. Staff considers that the "1913 Act" Assessment Districts may still be a viable financing alternative for those developments where the following circumstances exist: 1) it can be clearly demonstrated that the property to be assessed receives a special, local and direct benefit from the improvements, and 2) the developer agrees to contribute an amount equal to both, the assessment which would be levied on any public parcels (fire stations, libraries, parks, school, etc.) specially benefitting from the improvements and the amount which represents the general benefits derived from the improvements. An important consideration before approving future "1913 Act" districts would be the implications of a potential legal challenge by future property owners (Proposition 218 provides that the burden to prove that the fees and assessment are legal is on the City). Mello-Roos Communi~ Facilities Act of 1982 This section of the staff report is only intended to discuss the main advantages/disadvantages of Community Facilities Districts as compared with "1913 Act" Assessment Districts. The "Report on the Use of the Mello-Roos Community Facility Act of 1982 to Finance Infrastructure" (Attachment C), prepared by Brown, Diven & Hentschke, presents a complete discussion on this subject, and is summarized below. The "Mello-Roos Act" allows for the creation of Community Facilities DistricIS and the issuance of bonds to provide for financing the construction and/or acquisition of public facilities needed for the development. In addition, a CFD may also finance a broad range of services, including fire, flood control maintenance, landscaping, library, open-space facilities, parks, parkways, recreational services and school facilities maintenance. Any public facilities which the City may own, operate or contribute money to and which have a useful life of five or more years are eligible to be financed through a CFD. Debt services on the bonds are met through the imposition of a Special Tax (explicitly not ad valorem) on properties solely within the CFD. The special tax is collected with the property taxes. The ultimate security behind the bonds would be the properties located within the district, lli11 the City's General Fund or its ability to tax property within its jurisdiction. Advanta~es of a Communitv Facilities District. The main advantages of a Community Facilities District over an Assessment District may be the following: 1. Allocation of the special tax to properties within the CFD must be based on reasonable criteria, but does not specifically have to relate to the level of special benefit received by each property. Improvements providing general benefits may be fmanced by a CFD. ~/J-I ---~--_.__.._.,--_.- Page 5, Item~ Meeting Date 1/13/98 2. The Mello-Roos Act (CFD) provides that publicly owned parcels existing at the time of formation of the CFD are exempt from the levy of special taxes. 3. CFDs can finance a wider variety of public facilities and services. Assessment Districts have been limited to finance traditional public improvements, i.e., sanitary sewer, water, streets and drainage. In addition to those improvements, CFDs may fmance any facility which the City is authorized to own, construct or maintain. 4. CFDs provide landowners with off-balance sheet financing, since a property's only lien under a CFD is the annual special tax, I1Q1 the full amount of the bond principal. Disadvanta~es of a Community Facilities District. On the other hand, the main disadvantages may be : 1. Since a CFD levies a special tax, it requires 2/3rds vote approval, as opposed to a 50% majority needed with the "1913 Act". So far as formation of a district is concerned, the 2/3rds requirement may not be a problem since one or few developer(s) own(s) all the land. 2. Proposition 218 has a potential impact on CFDs, which still must be addressed in the California judicial system. This impact relates to the initiative power of the public to reduce or repeal an assessment, charge, fee or local tax that is used to pay debt service for outstanding bonds and also where the special tax is not collected for debt service. In the case of CFDs formed to finance services (as in landscaping maintenance districts), the legal consultant, Brown, Diven & Hentschke has indicated that the initiative power may be successful in reducing or repealing (with the approval of 2/3rds of the electorate) an existing special tax levied to finance such services. The consultant has also indicated that CFDs formed to finance the construction and/or aCQ lisition of infrastructure through the sale of bonds may be protected from the initiative power to reduce or repeal an existing special tax levied for that specific purpose under one or both of the following theories: First, that the repeal of the tax would violate the Contract Clause of the Constitution of the United States. Second, the levy of the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds is an exercise of an administrative function imposed upon the City by the Mello-Roos Act and not the exercise of the legislative power of the City. Inasmuch as the exercise of the initiative power is limited to legislative matters, it may not be used to curtail the exercise of a mandatory administrative duty. It should be mentioned that Assessment Districts are also subject to the same potential impacts of the initiative power of the public relative to financing services. /" ¿r'2 Page 6, Item~ Meeting Date 1/13/98 Goals and Policies Re~ardin~ the Establishment of Communi~ Facilities Districts As a prerequisite to the initiation of the formal proceedings to form a Community Facilities District, the "Mello-Roos Act" requires a local agency to consider and adopt a statement of local goals and policies concerning the use of the Act. A proposed policy document (Appendix D of Attachment C) was prepared by the consultant Brown, Diven & Henschke, reviewed by City staff, and discussed with the major developers of Eastern Chula Vista. In addition to complying with all the requirements of the "Mello-Roos Act", this document also incorporates all the current applicable City's policies and procedures for the use of Assessment District fInancing in the City. The following discussion on the recommended goals and policies wiII focus on the most relevant issues regarding CFD's fmancing, as follows: 1. The document requires the submittal of an "Application", which would include all the necessary information (business plan, percenl of ownership requesting the CFD, etc.) demonstrating the applicant's fmancial ability to carry the project, including the payment of special taxes, during buildout. The Application shall be reviewed by a committee composed of the City Manager, City Attorney, Director of Public Works, City Engineer, Planning Director, Finance Director and such consultants and additional persons as the City Manager may deem necessary. The committee shall prepare a report with fIndings and recommendations, which shall be submitted to Council prior to initiating the formal proceedings for formation of a CFD. 2. As a consequence of experiences during the recent recession, the "goals and policies" require a minimwn 4: 1 value-to-lien ratio. A ratio of less than 4: 1, but equal to or greater than 3:1, may be approved, in the sole discretion of Council, when it is determined that a ratio of less than 4:1 is fmancially prudent under the circumstances of a particular CFD. It should be noted that current Assessment District policy only requires a ratio equal to or greater than 3: 1. 3. The docwnent establishes that the maximum annual CFD special taxes applicable to any newly developed residential property shall be no more than 1 % of the sale price of the house. In addition, the aggregate of all annual taxes and assessments is limited to 2 % of the sale price of the house, as in current City policy. 4. The proposed "goals and policies" would prohibit the escalation of the maximwn special tax for a residential parcel after the fIscal year in which the building permit for such parcel is issued. 5. The proposed maximum annual special tax would be set at 110% of the expected annual debt service. This guideline would provide added security for the special tax bonds. g/'~ Page 7, Iteml Meeting Date 1/13/98 6. The document provides that all property not statutorily exempt from the levy of special taxes shall bear its appropriate share of the CFD's aggregate special tax obligation. Undeveloped land may be taxed at different rates than those levied on developed property of the same land use designation, but the undeveloped land will still bear its appropriate share of the special tax based on the benefit received from the improvements being financed. 7. The document contains specific requirements regarding disclosure to buyers within a CFD. All the disclosure requirements of Section 5.46.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Attachment D) have also been incorporated. It should be mentioned that the Act requires that specific notice of the special tax obligation be provided to all purchasers including not only the initial purchasers of dwelling units but to subsequent purchasers as well 8. The proposed policy declares that it is the goal of the City Council to require the developer to pay a monetary compensation of I % of the bond authorization amount as consideration for the City's agreement to use the City's bonding capacity to provide the fmancing mechanism for the financing and/or acquisition of the authorized improvements. Payment would be required prior to the issuance of bonds and for a CFD with multiple bond series of bonds, the prorata portion of the payment would be due with each bond issue. The proposed policy also declares that such monetary compensation shall be born by the developer and shall not be financed out of the district bond proceeds. As mentioned before, at the August 20, 1996 public hearing on the Development Agreement for Baldwin Builders, a number of residents from the Paloma Master Planned Community in the City of San Marcos raised several issues regarding the CFD formed to finance several public improvements for that development. The main complaints were: I) the annual tax exceeded 2 % of the assessed value of the homes, 2) Mello-Roos taxes increased yearly, and 3) Baldwin became delinquenl in paying their share of the taxes. Staff considers that the safeguards incorporated in the "statement of goals and policies" will ensure that the aforementioned issues # I and 2 will not occur in any CFD formed in Chula Vista. Regarding issue # 3, staff believes that the requirement to submit an "Application", which would include all the necessary information demonstrating the applicant's financial ability to carry the project, including the payment of special taxes during buildout, would provide a level of assurance that the project will be developed as planned. In addition, the requirement of a minimum 4: I value-to-lien ratio would provide added protection in the event of default by the developer. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that the use of CFDs for public financing, like many other fmancial decisions, involves a calculated risk and nothing can complelely insulate the City from the possibility of future problems. Taxpayers may complain. Changes in the real estate market may happen and delinquencies occur. A developer may make the decision to walk away from a project because it is no longer economically feasible. Staff believes, however, thai the adoption '8"'--7 Page 8, Item~ Meeting Date 1/13/98 of lhe proposed "goals and policies" would minimize lhe occurrence and consequences of lhese potential problems. Comments from Developers On September 19, 1997, staff met wilh lhe following developers to discuss lhe proposed report and goals and policies: Ayres Land Company (Sunbow II), EastLake, McMillin, Otay Ranch Development, and San Miguel Ranch. Pacific Bay Homes (Salt Creek Ranch) was invited but did not attend lhe meeting. Minor changes and clarifications proposed by lhe developers, at lhe meeting, were incorporated into lhe document. In addition, McMillin presented lheir comments and requested several changes to lhe "goals and policies" in three letters dated October 2, 1997 (Attachment E), October 22, 1997 (Attachment F), and October 27 (Attachment H). Staff met wilh McMillin representatives to clarify lhe intent of lhe policy document and discuss lheir concerns. The majority of McMillin's concerns were satisfactorily resolved, wilh lhe exception of lhe following policy issues: 1. Acquisition of InJprovements. McMillin requested that lhe City approve lhe acquisition of discrete and/or useable reaches of improvements (Item 3 of Attachment E). The proposed policy for CFDs is consistent wilh lhe current policy for ADs, which requires lhat improvements be acquired on a "complete" project basis, such as a street wilh alllhe surface and underground improvements completed and accepted by lhe City. Staff believes lhat lhe proposed policy provides some flexibility by leaving lhe determination of "complete project" and lhe approval of any deviation of lhe project definition to lhe Director of Public Works and recommends approval of lhe proposed policy. 2. Maintenance of Public Parks. McMillin requested that maintenance of public parks should be permitted as required to comply wilh applicable conditions of approval (Item 4 of Attachment E). The conditions of approval of Chula Vista Tract 97-02 (McMillin Otay Ranch) require thallhe "public" pedestrian park P-5 be maintained by lhe CFD which would be formed to maintain lhe landscape improvements within that development. Normally, lhe maintenance of public parks is funded by lhe City's General Fund. Staff believes lhat requiring lhe maintenance of public parks by a CFD should be generally discouraged, but may be considered by Council on a case-by-case basis under special circumstances. The proposed policy, allhough it does not explicitly include maintenance of public parks, covers lhis activity by approving lhe CFD financing for all services aulhorized by lhe Mello-Roos Act ( which include maintenance of public parks). Staff recommends approval of lhe proposed policy. 3. Ori¡¡ination Char~e. On October 9, 1990 Council approved Resolution 15897 establishing lhe payment of an origination charge of one percent (I %) of lhe estimated bond sale for developer-initiated Assessment Districts. McMillin is requesting lhe elimination of lhe requirement to pay an origination charge (Items 8 and 19 of Attachment E & Item 3 of Attachment H) from lhe original version of lhe "CFDs goals and policies". McMillin's ~--~ Page 9, ItemL Meeting Date 1/13/98 position is that said charge fails any test for a pennissible fee or tax under existing law and that the City does not have the legal authority to impose said charge. However, the City contends that the term "origination charge" does not reflect the actual intent of the required payment which is that certain monetary compensation may be required as consideration for the City's agreement to provide the fInancing mechanism for fInancing the public improvements serving the developer's project. The nature of the payment is actually a form of contractual consideration. The Goals and Policies declare that the appropriate compensation would be I % of the bond authorization. Staff considers that the developer is receiving a tangible benefIt by using the City's bonding capacity to provide funds for developing his property. Use of public fInancing districts historically has decreased the developer's cost of fInancing and has enhanced the developer's ability to fInance their projects. Typically, the developer advance the funds necessary to construct the improvements, and the City subsequently acquires the improvements and makes a payment or payments from bond proceeds to the developer upon completion of the project. This enables the developer to recover the money advanced sooner than if these costs were incorporated into the selling price of the homes. In addition, this is an important feature if a developer is near the ceiling of the development loan and needs the capital to pursue other development requirements. This fInancing frees up construction loan money which in turn can be used to construcl the next project. Another benefIt is that in obtaining special district fInancing, the developer uses the City's name to obtain tax exempt rates creating a savings of thousands of dollars in interest costs not only for the future homeowners, but the developers as well. In a letter to McMillin dated October 27, 1997, John P. Yeager of Hewitt & Mcguire, LLP states that "... the Origination Charge could result in increased interest rate on the bonds, which in turn, would reduce the amount of proceeds available to acquire public improvements. In the final analysis then, the Ultimate taxpayer -- each homeowner within a community facilities district for example -- will receive less for its special tax dollars. .. " (Attachment F, item C, second paragraph). In this respect, staff requested the opinion of Carl Kadie of Kadie- Jensen, Johnson & Bodnard, who have been the fmancial advisors for the majority of the assessment districts formed in the City. The consultant has indicated that the City has successfully offered bonds to the market by public and negotiated sale with the origination charge in place. He also indicated that prior bonds have been extremely well received and that in his opinion the existence of the origination charge has not resulted in higher interest rates on the bonds. The major factors determining the interest rates are: value to lien ratio, diversity of ownership, fInancial strength of the developer, and developmenl proforma. 25'/1 Page 10, Item~ Meeting Date 1/13/98 borrower pays points to get a lower loan interest rate. In public financing, staff considers reasonable that the developer pays consideration for the use of the City's bonding capacity, which would result in lower interest rates. In conclusion staff recommends approval of the proposed policy that requires the developer to pay a monetary compensation of one (1 %) percent of the bond sale amount as consideration for the fmancing and/or acquisition of the authorized improvements and eligible incidental expenses. Staff recommends that the requirement to pay such monetary consideration be incorporated in the Acquisition/Financing agreement, which sets outs the terms and conditions for the use of public financing to acquire the public improvements financed by the proposed district. This agreement is approved by Council prior to the public hearing to consider the fonnation of the district. McMillin also requested that the 1 % monetary compensation be eligible for financing out of the district bond proceeds. The proposed Goals and Policies categorize said compensation as an ineliiible incidental cost. Staff believes that such cost should be born by the developer and not included in the special taxes to be paid by the future property owners. This is consistent with the existing policy for assessment district financing. Staff recommends approval of the proposed policy of requiring a Consideration charge for CFD's. 4. ReQ lired Value-to-Lien Ratio The developer is requesting (Item 9 of Attachment E & Item 1 of Attachment G) that this criteria be the same as currently required for AD's fmancing (minimum of 3:1). Staff recommends that, due to the experience during the recent recession, the City should adopt a more conservative approach and recommends approval of the proposed criteria requiring a minimum 4:1 value-to-lien ratio. However, the proposed policy adds certain flexibility to this criteria by providing that a ratio of less that 4: 1 but equal to or greater than 3: 1 may be approved, in the sole discretion of Council, when it is detennined that a ratio of less than 4: 1 is financially prudent under the circumstances of a particular CFD. 5. Maximum Ai~re~ate Taxes. McMillin objects to the provision requiring that compliance with the maximum aggregate tax criteria (2 % of the house price) for newly residential properties be demonstrated at the close of escrow (Item 10 of Attachment E & Item 2 of Attachment G). This procedure would ensure that the aggregate tax, to be paid by the purchaser of the house, meets the City's criteria. This requirement has been imposed on the fonnation of recent assessment districts in the City and was mandated by previous Council action in 1995. McMillin proposes that compliance with said criteria be conducted at the time of district fonnation and based on the weighted average sale prices of new homes or the assessed value of existing homes within the community facilities district. With this approach the ultimate taxpayer may end up paying a tax which is higher than the 2 % of the actual sale price. Staff considers that requiring compliance at the close g~ /0 Page 11, Item~ Meeting Date 1/13/98 of escrow will ensure that the aggregate tax will meet the financial criteria and recommends approval of the proposed procedure. In summary, staff recommends that the City take a more conservative position in public financing issues rather than the somewhat more liberal approach proposed by McMillin. For example, McMillin's proposal for the ability to go less than the 3: 1 value-to-lien ratio and basing the maximum aggregate tax on the "weighted average" sales price of the new homes outlined above are more liberal than staff's proposals. The approval of the proposed "CFD's goals and policies" would provide the City with the essential tools to assure fairness in the application of special taxes to property owners, protect the City's credit rating and financial position, and ensure that the City's financial obligations with the bondholders are met in accordance with the Act. FISCAL IMPACT: None to the General Fund. McMillin and Otay Ranch Development have agreed to pay for all City staff and consultant cost incurred in the preparation of the subject report and the "statement of goals and policies". In future districts, the developers will front all necessary cost for the establishment of a proposed CFD and will be reimbursed once bonds are sold. I FILE: 0725-1O-CFDOO 08, 1997; 12:53pm Ian 07, 1998; 4:06pm H:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA \CFDPOL3.LDT g~/I ______ _.._.·U RESOLUTION NO. / f{¿['¿'C RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STATEMENT OF GOALS AND POLICIES REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS WHEREAS, McMillin Project Services and Otay Ranch Development requested the City to initiate proceedings for the establishment of Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) also known as Mello-Roos Districts, pursuant to the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" ("Mello-Roos Act"), to finance specific public improvements serving their proposed developments; and WHEREAS, staff retained a consultant, Brown, Diven & Hentschke, based on their expertise and experience in working with the City and other agencies to prepare a report on the use of CFDs as a public financing mechanism within the City of Chula Vista; and WHEREAS, the "Mello-Roos Act" requires that as a prerequisite for the use of CFDs, the city shall adopt a "statement of local goals and policies" concerning the use of the Act which was also prepared by the consultant and reviewed by staff and developers; and WHEREAS, the approval of this resolution will ratify the use of CFDs as a public financing mechanism for (1) the construction and/or acquisition of public infrastructure, and (2) the provision of authorized public services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby adopt the City of Chula vista statement of goals and pOlicies regarding the establishment of Community Facilities Districts as set forth in Attachment "C", Appendix B ("Policy"). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Policy is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term and provision herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms or provisions are determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this Policy shall be deemed of no further force and effect in its entirety. Presented by Approved as to form by CL~ R~ John P. Lippitt, Director of John M. Kaheny, City Atlorney Public Works c: \rs\cfds ¿rr/~ ^ _......_._.~--- --_...._,~ THE DrAY RANCH' COMPANY January 13, 1998 The Honorable Shirley Horton Mayor Members of the Chula Vista City Council CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Re: Staff Recommendation Concerning Statement of Goals and Policies Regarding the Establishment of Community Facilities Districts (Agenda Item 8) Dear Mayor Horton and Councilmembers: The Otay Ranch Company supports the staff recommendation concerning the Statement of Goals and Policies regarding the establishment of Community Facilities Districts. We are currently in the process of developing a Community Facility District (CFD) for portions of Village One. As part of this process, we are seriously considering fmancing part or all of the SPA One local parks through a Community Facility District. This is consistent with state law and the proposed goals and policies. However, city staff has expressed reluctance to include the parks. Because of the time and expense necessary to perfonn the preliminary work leading to thè creation of a CFD, The Otay Ranch Company seeks to use this agenda item to infonn the Council of our proposal and to solicit the Council's support for our current direction. Pennitting parks to be funded throughout a CFD provides the following benefits: . Provides laTf!er neif!hborhood parks earlier: The use of a CFD will enable The Otay Ranch Company to build all of our initial 11 acre park very early in the development . of SPA One. Without CFD funding, the park would be phased over several years. Specifically, under the standard PLDO/turn-key approach, the park would not have to be completed until over 1,800 homes were constructed. . Assures timelv fimdinf! of Communitv Parks: The use of a CFD will ensure that funding is assured for the construction of community parks. Otay Ranch's community parks are larger than community parks required in other master planned communities (i.e., 25 acres verses 15 acres). The first Otay Ranch Community Park is outside of SPA One (in Village 2). These considerations have created some 1 t 975 EI Camino RealI Suite 104 . San Diego, CA 92 t 30 Tel. 619-259-2934 . Fax. 619-259-4364 E-mail. ahartin@otay.com ?~/3 --~~'--'---"-"-~--"---'--"~---"-'-------- -.-. _..._---------~_._-"---_._-_.- The Honorable Shirley Horton Mayor Members of the City Council CITY OF CHULA VISTA January 13, 1998 Page 2 concerns as to how to best assure the City that future community parks will be developed as needed. CFD funding solves this problem. . Solves Droblems with dual ownershiD of the Villafle Five Dark site: The initial Village Five neighborhood park is owned by both the McMillin Companies and the Otay Ranch Company. This creates coordination problems to ensure the park is built by both parties, when needed. Use of a CFD solves this problem. In response to the benefits offered by our proposal, and in light of our practical need to receive an early indication from the Council about our proposal, The Otav Ranch ComDanv reauests that vour Council OOODt the recommended Dolicies and indicate vour SUDDOrt for the use of CFD fmancim! for local Darks. consistent with City Policv and state laws. Sincerely, THE OTA Y RANCH COMPANY KAlmdrn C:\Mora\K.im\Letters\City Council 1-13-98 [?/Jý ~ i ~ ~ ... ~ ~0 ~ ~;- -t-- ~ ..... z , <t: ~ 'I: P-.t>¡....,J :z: :.:: p... . ~ ... ¡:>:; . < ¡:>:; W ~<t;; , <t: :I:>:::E u Z...¡;; <t:><t: ¡:>:; Z ..... / ~ ?i r fý E-< ,...¡ ~ o ~ is u..P:::: v'" t~ p... . ~ ~ #} ... " .... 3 t~ r ~ II: or/5 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 9 - Meeting Date 1/13/98 ITEM TITLE: Report Regarding the Development Impact Fee (DIF) and Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) Fee Funds for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1997 Resolution NO/.r 8" ~~ing Findings that the Unexpended Funds in the Various DIF Funds are still needed to provide construction of facilities for which the fees were collected SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finance ~ ~ Director of Public Works REVIEWED BY: City Manager ç Ii- ~ jl. (4/5THS Vote: Yes_NoX) k' State Government Code Section 66000 requires local agencies assessing Development Impact Fees ("DIF") fees to make available specified financial data to the public each fiscal year. It also requires that the local agency provide this information to the public for a minimum of fifteen days prior to reviewing this information at a public meeting. This report has been available in the City Clerk's office for public review since December 24, 1997. We have also chosen to include for ease of reference and for the convenience of members of the public Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD) fees in this same report. Local agencies are also required to make findings every five years for any DIF funds remaining unexpended that identify the purpose for the fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged. This year the City has elected to make such findings for any funds remaining unexpended for five or more years. This report includes the required fmancial information for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 and specifies the findings of need for funds held for five years. Copies of this report were sent to the Ayres Land Company, the Building Industry Association of San Diego, the Eastlake Development Company, the McMillin Companies, the Otay Ranch Company and Pacific Bay Homes. 9-/ Page 2, Item L Meeting Date 1/13/98 RECOMMEl'.'DATION: That Council accept the report and approve the Resolution making findings that the unexpended funds in the various DIF Funds are still needed to provide construction of facilities for which the fees were collected. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable. DISCUSSION: The City of Chula Vista has several types of Development Impact Fees ("DIF") and Parkland Acquisition and Development fees ("PAD") which were assessed during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997. The major categories of DIFs are for transportation, traffic signal, park, drainage, sewer and public facilities. During FY97 no new DIFs were added. All existing DIFs remained at the same rate as the previous year. DEVELOPMENTIMPACTFEESmI~ TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City to finance and coordinate the construction of new transportation facilities so that streets are built when needed. This fee is applicable to all new development east of 1-805. Prior to the program, streets were built by developers in a fragmented fashion with 6-lane facilities, necking down to 2-lanes and expanding back to 6 lanes again. In addition, there was a fairness issue since some developers fronted on large streets and others did not. Now all developers in the Eastern portion of Chula Vista pay the same fee per dwelling unit and either the City constructs the street or a developer does, using the cost to offset the TransDIF fee at the building permit stage. The fee for FY97 was $3,998 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). Detailed FY97 fmancial information is presented on Attachment A - Schedule 1. EASTLAKE PARK DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City to finance and coordinate the construction of park facilities in the EastLake area. During FY96, the City and EastLake revised the original agreement. Under the revised agreement, the City has loaned the principal and interest from this fund to EastLake at 3 % interest until July 1, 1999. When the funds are repaid, they will be used to build a community center. Detailed FY97 fmancial information is presented on Attachment A - Schedule 2. TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE - This fee was adopted to provide for the projected traffic signal needs for the City that result from increases in traffic volume caused by development. As funds are accumulated they are expended on traffic signal projects that meet the warrants at the time the funds are available. This is a city-wide fee with a FY97 rate of $13 per tr ip generated. Detailed FY97 financial information is presented on Attachment A - Schedule 3. 9-;¿ Page 3, Item ~ Meeting Date 1/13/98 TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF - This fee is applicable to all new development within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin. The FY97 fee was $3,922 per acre and pays for the construction of the Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo Ladera and the EastLake Business Center and a portion of the channel west of I-80S. Detailed FY97 financial information is presented on Attachment A - Schedule 4. INTERIM PRE-SR125 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City to finance transportation facilities in the Eastern Territories that would be needed to provide adequate and safe tra!!-sportation facilities if there are delays in the construction of State Route (SR) 125 by CALTRANS or others. The fee in FY97 was $820 per EDU. Detailed FY97 fmancial information is presented on Attachment A - Schedule 5. TELEGRAPH CANYON GRAVITY SEWER DIF - This is a fee for the expansion of the trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. The FY97 fee was $184 per EDU. Detailed FY97 fmancial information is presented on Attachment A - Schedule 5. TELEGRAPH CANYON PUMPED SEWER DIF - This fee is collected for the expansion of the Telegraph Canyon trunk sewer to serve those properties outside of the basin. These flows are pumped into the trunk line temporarily and it is anticipated they will ultimately drain to another basin, either Poggi or Salt Creek, by gravity. If Telegraph Canyon basin becomes built out, there may be no reserve capacity for the temporary pumped flows and a parallel system must be built. If, however, the capacity is never exceeded once the Telegraph Canyon gravity basin is built out and no parallel system is built because of the temporary flows, the funds will be returned to the current property owners. The FY97 fee was $560 per EDU. Detailed FY97 financial information is presented on Attachment A - Schedule 5. SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted to provide the necessary financing to construct the Salt Creek Interceptor. This fee is applicable to the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, that portion of the Upper Otay Lake Basin north of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, and that portion of the Lower Otay Lake Basin east of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. The fee in FY97 was $284 per EDU. Detailed FY97 financial information is presented on Attachment A - Schedule 5. PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF - The Public Facilities DIF is a city-wide fee with several components levied to fund that portion of public facilities projects attributable to new development. Prior to July 1993, the separate fee components collected for the different public facilities were placed in separate funds. . Funds from one facility component fund could not be used to fmance projects of another facility component, regardless of the need for, or timing of the various projects. Loans were made from other City funds for project components with insufficient cash. Under the current ordinance, fees collected after July 1993 for the separate fee components are consolidated in a single fund rather than in separate facility funds. Thus, the funds are 9-3 Page 4, Item í Meeting Date 1/13/98 available for whichever approved project is currently scheduled and inter-fund loans are minimized. For FY97 the total fee for all components was $2,150 per EDU. Detailed FY97 financial information is presented on Attachment B - Schedules 1 and 2. The components of the Public Facilities DIF with the associated fee are as follows: ADMINISTRATION ($79) - Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program, overseeing of expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of costs, etc. This fee is set at 2 % of the other Public Facilities DIFs charged. CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION ($527) - Expansion of the Civic Center per the Civic Center Master Plan prepared in 1989, to provide sufficient building space and par king for the existing and anticipated staff and the public. POLICE FACILITY ($235) - Accommodation of the building space needs per the Civic Center Master Plan, which included upgrading of the communications center, construction of a new crime lab, office improvements and installation of new communication consoles. Also included is the purchase and installation of a new computer aided dispatch system (CAD), a new Records Management System, and new Mobile Digital Terminals. CORPORATION YARD RELOCATION ($515) - Relocation of the City's existing corporation yard from the bayfront area to a site more centrally located and of a larger size. The existing site is near capacity. LIBRARIES ($544) - Improvements include construction of the South Chula Vista library and Eastern Territories library(ies), and installation of a new automated library system. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM ($141) - Projects include the relocation of Fire Station #4 & #3, construction of a fire training tower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig, expansion of Fire Station #1, installation of a radio communications tower and construction of an interim and permanent Station #6. GEOGRAPIDC INFORMATION SYSTEM ($49) - Purchase and installation of a GIS system for mapping of various base maps and creation of geo -data files to aid in planning and processing of land developments. MAINFRAME COMPUTER ($23) - Purchase and installation of a new mainframe computer and various enhancements to meet existing and future needs for additional memory and storage space and enhanced processing speed. TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE ($32) - Upgrading and expansion of the City's existing telephone system to accommodate growth, including installation of new conduit, 9-t/ Page 5, Item ~ Meeting Date 1/13/98 wiring additional telephone lines, and a voice processing system. RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ($5) - Updating and modernization of the existing records system to prepare the City for anticipated increases in transactions and volumes of records. PARKLAND ACOUlSITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAm FEES This in lieu fee was adopted by the City to acquire neighborhood and community parkland and construct parks and recreational facilities. The FY97 fee was $4,375 per single family DU. Detailed FY97 fmancial information is presented on Attachment C. FY97 FINANCIAL INFORMATION Attachment A, Schedules 1 through 5 reports the required financial information for all DIFs other than public facilities. Attachment B, Schedules 1 and 2 reports the required financial information for the Public Facilities DIF and its components. Attachment C reports the required financial information for the PAD fees. The schedules contain the following items: - The beginning balances as of July 1, 1996 - The fees received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 - Other miscellaneous revenues received during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 - The interest earned from investing the cash balances available in each fund during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 - The expenditures from each of the funds during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 - A description of each capital project with expenditures funded entirely or in part by DIF/P AD in FY97 and the percentage of the project funded by this fee through FY97. More detailed information on any project is available in the annual Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Budget. - Information on any loans from DIF/PAD funds during FY97 - The ending balances as of June 30, 1997 for each of the DIF IP AD Funds The ending balances as of June 30, 1997 are in the process of being audited as part of the audit of City-wide financial statements, and are therefore subject to adjustment. 9-S ;../ .__._'_0...·. ___."...~"__ . ._....__ __~_______.__...._ Page 6, Item í Meeting Date 1/13/98 FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR FUNDS IN POSSESSION OVER 5 YEARS Government Code Section 66001(d) requires the local agency to make [mdings every five years with respect to any portion of the DlF fees remaining unexpended to identify the purpose for which it was charged. This year the City has elected to make such [mdings for any funds remaining unexpended for five or more years. The following projects have fees which were collected five or more years ago which remain unexpended and are listed to satisfy Section 66001(d) of the Government Code. a. EastLake Park Development Impact Fee The fees collected prior to FY93 plus the interest earned are still needed for park facilities. Per Council direction, the funds are on loan to EastLake Development Company to be repaid July 1, 1999. b. Public Facilities DlF - Corporation Yard Relocation The City is in the process of siting a new corporation yard. The fees collected prior to FY93 are still needed for the intended purpose. The Corporation Yard Master Plan is currently being updated and will be available for review by developers in early February. This plan will be adopted as part of the Public Facilities DlF update which is targeted for adoption in March of 1998. c. Public Facilities DlF - Fire The fees collected prior to FY93 are still needed for [lIe facilities and have been committed to identified capital improvement projects for fire facilities. The Fire Station Master Plan is in the process of being updated and has already been reviewed by the development community and the Growth Management Oversight Commission. This plan will specify which facilities are to be built within various five year increments. This plan will be adopted as part of the Public Facilities DlF update which is targeted for adoption in March of 1998. No other DIF or PAD funds contain monies that have been on deposit for five or more years. FISCAL IMPACT: With findings that identify the continued need for the unexpended and/or committed or uncommitted fees, the City retains the DIF fees for the future projects. Without [mdings that the unexpended funds are still needed for the projects, the City would be obligated to refund the following funds plus inlerest accrued that have been held for five or more years pursuant to State Government Code Section 66000: $660,171 in park funds, $572,055 of PFDlF - Corporation Yard funds, and $111,846 of PFDlF - Fire Suppression System Funds. Since the City has loaned $800,000 of the park funds to the developer, EastLake Development Company, money would have to come from some other source to 9-¿' I -- ,-~-_. -----,', Page 7, Item -.L Meeting Date 1/13/98 refund the $660,171 plus interest. The loss of the funds would jeopardize the EastLake Park Agreement and the future EastLake community center. Without the $572,055 plus interest in PFDlF - Corporation Yard funds, alternative funding sources would likely need to be found for the corporation yard project, or the project would have to be scaled back to meet the available funding level. Without the $111,846 plus interest in PFDlF - Fire Suppression System funds, alternative funding sources would likely need to be found to construct needed fIre stations in the Eastern territories. Attachment A - Schedules 1 through 5: FY97 Financial Information for all DlFs except Public Facilities DlF Attachment B - Schedules 1 and 2: FY97 Financial Information for Public Facilities DlF Attachment C - FY97 Financial Information for PAD fees 9/7 RESOLUTION NO. ) íf~¿ / RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAKING FINDINGS THAT THE UNEXPENDED FUNDS IN THE VARIOUS DIF FUNDS ARE STILL NEEDED TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES FOR WHICH THE FEES WERE COLLECTED WHEREAS, Government Code §66000 requires local agencies assessing Development Impact Fees ("DIF") to make available specified financial data to the public each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this information has been available in the City Clerk's office for public review since December 24, 1997; and WHEREAS, it also required that the local agency review this information at a pUblic meeting; and WHEREAS, local agencies are also required to make findings once each year for any funds remaining unexpended or uncommitted for five or more years, which findings must identify the purpose for the fee and demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee ad the purpose for which it was charged. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby make findings that the unexpended funds in the various DIF Funds are still needed to provide construction of facilities for which the fees were collected for the following projects: EastLake Park Development Impact Fee The fees collected prior to FY93 plus the interest earned are still needed for park facilities. Per Council direction, the funds are on loan to EastLake Development Company to be repaid July 1, 1999. Public Facilities DIF - corporation Yard Relocation. The City is in the process of siting a new corporation yard. The fees collected prior to FY93 are still needed for the intended purpose. The Corporation Yard Master Plan is currently being updated and will be available for review by developers in early February. This plan will be adopted as part of the Public Facilities DIF update which is targeted for adoption in March of 1998. PUblic Facilities DIF - Fire The fees collected prior to FY 93 are still needed for fire facilities and have been committed to identified capital improvement projects for fire facilities. The 9-¿Ý . -- - -.-- - -- - ---~--,- - _._~.,._,--~ Fire station Master Plan is in the process of being updated and has already been reviewed by the development community and the Growth Management Oversight commission. This plan will be adopted as part of the Public Facilities DIF update which is targeted for adoption in March of 1998. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the staff report and all exhibits are hereby incorporated into the record of these proceedings. Presented by Approved as to form by (L Î\A~ ~~ Robert Powell, Director of John M. Kaheny, cify Finance Attorney C:\rs\findings.DIF 9~9 -.---.-.--.- ATTACHMENT A - SCHEDULE 1 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY97 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BY FEE Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) - Fund 621 Description of Fee: To finance and coordinate construction of new transportation facilities. Amount of the Fee: $3,998 per single family equivalent dwelling unit detacbed $3,198 per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached $2,399 per multi-family equivalent dwelling unit $99,950 per commercial gross acre $79,960 per industrial gross acre FY97 Fund Balance Information Fund 621 Trans DIF Beginning Balance as of 07101/96 $5, 175,387 TDIF Fees Collected 1,034,005 Refund from State on deposit for STM305 116,141 Interest Eamed 364,673 Expenditures (835,578) Unaudited Balance as of 06/30/97 $5,854,628 FY97 Expenditures: FY 96-97 % of Project Funded Project Project Description Expenditure by TDIF thru FY97 GG104 Geographic Information System $2,961 1.9% GG137 92/Engineering Remodel 569 53.0% GG156 98/City-wide LAN Upgtade 3,500 16.7% ST131B 89/0tay Lks Rd,Rutgers to Apache St 113,009 35.6% STM304 93/1-805,Tel Cyn Rd-Phase II 965 100.0% STM305 94/H St Interchange Impvt-Ph II 24,269 100.0% STM312 94/Bonita Rd,I-805,Plaza Bonita Rd (668) 100.0% STM322 95/0tay Lakes Rd Dual Left Tum Lane 146,246 91.2% STM327 96/1-805 Interchanges-Rick 179,887 100.0% TF236 96fTraffic Monitoring Program 7,604 100.0% TF248 97fTraffic Monitoring Ptogram 17 ,692 100.0% Administration 339,544 $835,578 9//0 09-Dec-97 ^....-.--.. ATTACHMENT A· SCHEDULE 2 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY97 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BY FEE EastLake Park Development Impact Fee (EL Park DIF) . Fund 621 Description of Fee: To finance and coordinate construction of park facilities in the EastLake area. Amount of the Fee: No longer assessed. FY97 Fund Balance Information EL Park DIF Beginning Balance as of 07/01/96 $16,490 EL Park Fees Collected 0 Interest Earned 1,095 Expenditures 0 Unaudited Balance as of 06/30/97 $17,585 Loans Repayment Description of Loan Amount of Loan Interest Rate Date Loan to Eastlake Development Corp. $800,000 3.00% July 01, 1999 approved by Council Reso. #18244 on March 26, 1996 9-// 10-Dec-97 ..- ~--"_..---.._~...- ATTACHMENT A - SCHEDULE 3 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY97 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BY FEE Traffic Signal Fee - Funds 211 & 600-6005 Description of Fee: For City's traffic signal needs resulting from increased traffic volume caused by new development Amount of the Fee: $13 per trip generated FY97 Fund Balance Information Fund 211 Fund 600-6005 Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Fund CIP Fund Total Beginning Balance as of 07/01/96 $653,232 $795,082 $1,448,314 Traffic signal Fees $190,822 190,822 Reimbursement from State for TF237 103,219 103,219 I nterest Earned 90,836 90,836 Expenditures (4,983) (499,990) (504,973) Transfers In(Out) (1,187,142) 1,187,142 0 Unaudited Balance as of 06/30/97 ($154,016) $1,482,234 $1,328,218 FY97 Expenditures: % of Project Funded FY 96-97 from Traffic Signal Project Project Description Expenditure Fees thru FY97 GG104 Geographic Information System $12,343 0.7% GG129 91/Records mgmt City-wide 200 1.8% GG137 92/Engineering Remodel 422 35.9% STL230 97/Pavement Overlay Program 25,000 7.3% STL231 97/Minor Entrance C,Cypress,Riverlaw 10,426 72.3% TF154 94/0tay Lakes Rd/Gotham Signal 211 100.0% TF211 91/1ndustrial & Anita, T.S. Install 8,668 100.0% TF220 92/1-805 & Otay Vly Rd T.S. Impvts 12,552 100.0% TF230 95fTraffic Signal Safety Project 17,009 100.0% TF232 96/Main & Date Signal 94,676 100.0% TF234 97/ProtecUPermisve Sig 3/J,5/H,Hltp/J 7,180 42.9% TF235 96fTraffic Signal Safety Upgrade 137,499 100.0% TF237 97fTraffic Signal System upgrade 108,310 100.0% TF240 97 fTraf Signal Upgrades-4 Locs-Ph II 12,766 100.0% TF241 97fTraf Signal-Buena Vista & Tel Cyn 23,930 100.0% TF244 97fTraffic Improvements-Peppertree R 5,010 100.0% TF247 97fTraf Signallns-Otay Lks & Rutgers 23,788 100.0% Administration 4,983 $504,973 9~J;;¿ 10-Dec-97 -------- ---------,~-- - ---.- ATTACHMENT A - SCHEDULE 4 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY97 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BY FEE Telegraph Canyon Drainage DIF (TC Drainage DIF) - Fund 628 Description of Fee: For construction of Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo Ladera and the Eastlake Business Center and for a portion of the channel west of 1-805. Amount of the Fee: $3,922 per acre FY97 Fund Balance Information Fund 628 TC Drainage DIF Beginning Balance as of 07/01/96 $1,084,228 DIF Fees Collected 227.162 Interest Earned 64,779 Expenditures (148,658) Unaudited Balance as of 06/30/97 $1,227,511 FY97 Expenditures: FY 96-97 % of Project Funded from Project Project Description Expenditure TC Drainage DIF thru FY97 DR119 96/Rain Gauges $472 36.2% GG152 97/Mainfrarne Fiscal System 118 1.2% ST131B 89/0tay Lks Rd,Rutgers to Apache St 5,663 2.1% DR118 Shy Lane-Right of Way Purchase 142,270 99.9% DR125 Tel Cyn Channel Stream Flow G 135 100.0% $148,658 9~/3 09-Dec-97 ----_._~--- ATIACHMENT A· SCHEDULE 5 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FY97 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BY FEE Interim Pre-SR125 DIF (SR125 DIF) - Fund 665 Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF (TC Gravity Sewer DIF) - Fund 627 Telegraph Canyon Pumped Sewer DIF (TC Pumped Sewer DIF) - Fund 629 Sa~ Creek Sewer Basin DIF (SC Sewer Basin DIF) - Fund 670 Description of Fees: Interim Pre--SR125 DIF: For providing transportation facilities in the Eastern Territories if SR-125 construction is delayed. Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF: For the expansion of trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. Telegraph Canyon Pumped Sewer DIF: For expansion of the Telegraph Canyon trnk sewer to serve properties outside of the basin. Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF: For construction of the Salt Creek Interceptor. Amount of the Fee: Fund 665 Fund 627 Fund 629 Fund 670 SR125 DlF TC Gravity Sewer DIF TC Pumped Sewer DIF SC Sewer Basin DIF per single family equivalent dwelling unit detached: $620 $184 $560 $284 per single family equivalent dwelling unit attached: $656 $184 $560 $284 pet mu~i-fam"y equivalent dwelling unit $492 $138 $420 $213 per commercial gross acre: $20,500 $184/edu-fixture unit based $5,600 $2,840 per industrial gross acre: $16,400 $184/edu-fixture unUased $5,600 $2,840 FY97 Fund Balance Information Fund 665 Fund 627 Fund 629 Fund 670 SR125 DIF TC Gravity Sewer DIF TC Pumped Sewer DlF SC Sewer Basin DIF Beginning Balance as of 07101/96 $1,117,264 $82,627 $92,688 $24,516 DIF Fees Collected 862.107 11,776 31,248 80,258 Interest Earned 91.437 5.296 6,132 3,717 Expenditures a Administration 0 (135) 0 (332) Unaudited Balance as of 6130/97 $2.070.806 $99.564 $130.068 $108.159 9'-)( 09-Dec-97 ~........_--"-~--- r--. .-.O\O¡:::- r;r:> 00 cccc......-c ....... N. 1:'4 \C - "'T C- O; 0 r.:..:".;..; ~ 'E g ;';~~8 ~ c... .. . . . ("I 1"1 _ M .,q. 'A '-' 10'). ~_ N ~ ~8 ~ i::::OC \C \C ...... \C 8 ;¡¡~;;::; !:! or) M "'-;::"00 - '-' _ o:~ I j õò c:c 1"1 C\ _.. C\ C\ I'C\ ..... ==0\0-. q N. \C.OI:!. ~ -~-o ...... \C 1"'110 C\ =-....0\...... 0.................. r-- ..!:! >-.<""ICIC _ "" _ ...v.¡ _ ....... ... ~ ~ ., M C\ S' ;-¡ COI.I \0 oc \0 ~ C':!':\Ooc 0 0...... ...... '::5.-0 o\\C"Ñ ....¡ .. - C\...... r-- 1"1....... ...... .= =<"'\00 "" "" "" C':IC __ ....... :;¡u ...... ,....,...... ...... . y- r-- - NN 0 0 -= 00 oo......N 00 N ~... M...... 0\_ 00 00 Ê~~b S ~ ~~ .....] c.l ct:lC'\...... N "" ::::I ccMOO "" "" ~ ~~'=""" -.==~ '-' - Q'- i- ...§ ... ~$~;q 8~:¥~ >. r-- "'T 00 N 00 C :: ~~~~ C'\ ~ ~M ~ ~ ~~ ~c.C'\""" N "" - M 0 ~~ =1'"'\00..,. ""e.!:!ð: CI) <'II :ë... ~ æ~ NCQ ô,g!! ~ æ : ("I ~ ~~ ~.::-=.2 L:J -M...... . -.. 'o=c. u. ;-0 ~ 00 N\O ~ C =::1 I-z s",C'I...... _ t5 -00 NOell..:. ~o ~MOO - "" ...... ~ ::r-'å~ ..... a.¡:: -.~ c:'.- ... w :::E 0:( 5-10 ~ ~ ...J -:::E u C\ = ... ~ I-Q: 0 "TN N _ \0...... N œ>-8= wZQ 00 MIO...... ":C C'\Nl"'- 0\...1.:.._:::1"; - Wu.. 00. M.t'"-. M. ;.2 ~ M. '0. 0\. -==004.1 Ü~~ .:: ~ ~~ S >-=!::!;5 ~~~ N"'=~~ã fJ) OW c C'I -- 0 c.~C\""" 00...... _ ...... ..E\O"O ._ ...JC,).... N" I._MOO "" N UCOc!:!'g c:lwZ . _ ""I- Co;" """ -OON"?ï::U I- Gj:S u'=: 1;C'\~~~ ~ 0« .:. z;¡. "C ~ G.I ~ æ~ ...... NM '\T :;- -::::;:: _ ~'ë..2«1.š û ¡:::z ~ g-¡ 8;: 8 ..... :g g:!;õ ~ ËU3:'C.... < -::I -. ~ ~ ~. 0:,0>' _ ~ _ ~ ~ _Uo:.>C;: ~ c3~ ~~:::: ~ ~~ ~ ~ª::8 ~::g ~~ ~ i5-ª;:.2.~ < <0) --- M M cc.oQ'\1t') N __ Q'\ ="'011...._ u.>- ¡;:"E-::IC ~ ~ ¡:..c:IIMCO ~ ~ u.o _.=.~ ou. v;¡ ¡;:., ~ .=":1 di: -= 'C - . - -=.;:- a ::¿~_~ ::I ~=~ .~ ~ - It') ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _..._~> ~õ ~ It') ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g~~~~ ~;;::: I""Ï .....; c;\ c.o tON Ñ r-: r-: oÕ:';; 0 ~~._ _e~ ~ It') ~ ~=~~ ~ ~ ~ C~-5~ ~~co ~ ~ U~MCO ~ Ñ ¿_~...= c'"' '-' ~ ~...c!2U. u= ~=~~~ E=~.E:tO - ~ ~$ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ _ e _0 ~ ~~ ~ It') ~~-O 0 u ~ . - ~ ~ -0\- ~ _ ~ . _ ~ ~t~ ~ ~: ~ ~g~ S ~~M~ $ 0 U=S ~ - ~ ~M;C ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Ü;C r;" 0 Z ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 o ~ c ,... Z .... Z q¡ \0 15 9 \0 ë ~ ~ z:g ~ z 0) - u.: C) t.:.J ..... 0 ...... 0 a::: ¡::: v:: 0 a::: j:::: v:: 0 < 000< 0 \:)0 w ¡.:,¡ Z ~ LIJ ¡.:,¡ Z i:2 ~ u - ¡.:,¡ ~ u v::- ¡.:,¡ < Z Z ~ < Z dZ ~ u < <~ ~ 0 -< v::<~ ~ "' ~ < (f.) ~ <. -< ~ < v::u.:æ ~ ~ < v::¡.:,¡¡.:,¡~ ~ u. ~ s~~ ~ u. ~ s~~~ 0 5 0 zæ~ ~ ã 0 z~ffi~ ¡.:,¡ (f.) z u.:~~ ~ (f.) z u.:~~_ ~ !:!:! - >":;0 - w - >..1":::0 _ ~ z u.:~z 0 ~ ~ t.:.J<~Z 0 = ~ ~~¡.:,¡ ~ ~ - ~~¡.:,¡u.: ~ u " .>~ < 0 0 ~z>~ -< < ¡.:,¡ = x z < u.: -~zX z u. ~ Q~¡.:,¡ ~ u. = Q~_¡.:,¡ ~ ~ u ~ 9~/"-Ç ~ ~ ò . CJ " ATTACHMENT B· SCHEDULE 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF (PFDIF) - DETAILED EXPENDITURES FY 96-97 FY 96-97 '10 of Project Funded Project Description Expenditure from PFDIF thru FY97 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION - Fund 850-8501 Administration $163,036 CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION - Funds 802 & 820 GG137 92/Engineering Remodel $26 2.2% GG142 94/TeJecommunications Trench 11,681 100.0% GG130 91/Acquire property 32,762 100.0% Total PFDIF - Civic Ctr Expansion $44,469 POLICE FACILITIES REMODELLING - Fund 850-8503 PS115 97/Public Safety Communications $1,411 58.4% PS144 96/PD Locker Room Renovations 17,467 36.7% Total PFDlF - Police Facilities Remodelling $18,878 LIBRARIES FOR EASTERN TERRITORIES - Fund 850-8505 LB125 92/New Area Library-So CV $816,808 26.2% FIRE SUPPRESSION SYS EXPANSION - Funds 806 & 850-8506 PS120 92/New Fire StalE. H & Paseo Ranch $8,293 100.0% PS147 97/Fire Facilities Master Plan 13,225 100.0% Total PFDIF - Fire Suppression Systems Expansion $21,518 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM - Fund 850-8507 GG104 Geographic Information System $8,622 30.7% GG156 98/City-wide LAN Upgrade 3,500 50.0% Total PFDIF - GIS $12,122 TELEPHONE SWITCH EXPANSION - Fund 850-8509 GG128 91/Phone System Upgrades $6,899 100.0% RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - Fund 850-8510 GG156 98/City-wide LAN Upgrade $3,500 50.0% 9~J? - - _. -~--- ._.-. ATTACHMENT C PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT (PAD) FEES FY97 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD) Fees - Funds 420 & 600-6004 Description of Fee: In lieu fee for providing neighborhood and community park and recreational facilities. Amount of the Fee: $4,375 per single family dwelling unit detached $3,810 per single family dwelling unit attached $2,990 per multi-family dwelling unit $3,365 per duplex dwelling unit $2,230 per mobile home dwelling unit $2,030 per motel/hotel dwelling unit FY97 Fund Balance Information Fund 420 Fund 600-6004 PAD Fund PAD CIP Fund Total Beginning Balance as of 07/01/96 $5,182 $1,540,722 $1,545,904 Park Dedication Fees 504,385 504,385 Interest Earned 111,952 111,952 Expenditures (341,177) (341,177) Transfers In (Out) (323,950) 323,950 0 Unaudited Balance as of 06130/97 $297,569 $1,523,495 $1 ,821 ,064 FY97 Expenditures: % of Project Funded FY 96-97 from PAD fees Project Project Description Expenditure thru FY97 PR136 94/Master Plan Study-Eucalyptus Park $9,130 100.0% PR146 94/Renovate Play EquipWarious Sites $36,685 33.3% PR162 921Parkway Complex Renovation-Ph I $21,992 59.0% PR164 93/Parks Implementation Plan $875 100.0% PR168 93/Memorial Park-Phase II $59,351 69.0% PR169 93/Greg Rogers Park Impvts-Ph I $8,559 100.0% PR175 93/Hilltop Park Improvements $915 100.0% PR177 93/McCandliss Memorial Park-Ph II $2,327 100.0% PR178 94/McCandliss Mem Grove Pk-Ph III $28,316 100.0% PR183 93/Playground Renovation $31,179 100.0% PR185 93/Park Acquisition & Development $21,635 100.0% PR188 96/Eastem Aquatic Complex $20,000 7.1% PR205 96/0utdoor Sports Court Renovation $2,019 100.0% PR208 96IPh III Playground Renovation $64,420 100.0% PR210 96iLauderbach Improvements $15,720 100.0% PR211 Eucalyptus Park Parking Lot $17,697 100.0% PR218 97/Park Security Lighting $357 100.0% $341,177 9~)7 22-Dec-97 ,_.~~--_._~~-----~----_._- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /.tJ Meeting Date 01/13/98 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: To consider approval of a modified City Gaming Plan, pursuant to Chapter 5.20 of the Municipal Code, to allow for: 1) further consolidation of cardroom licenses to permit a 24-table cardroom; 2) cardroom operations on a 24 hours a day, 365 days a year basis; 3) additional types of games; 4) revised cardroom license transfer policies; and 5) related amendments /8'8'in.:2. RESOLUTION mending the City Gaming Plan to include a security element and denying request for further modification of the City Gaming Plan pursuant to Chapter 5.20 of the Municipal Code ~. SUBMITTED BY: City Mana~r Chief of Po Ice (4/5ths Vote: Yes_ No_X..! RECOMMENDATION: A. Council can deny the request and continue to follow the Gaming Plan instituted in February, 1996. Given current information, staff supports this proposal. B. Council can modify the Gaming Plan to include applicants' requested changes. BACKGROUND: During the City Council meeting of February 20, 1996, the City Council approved a Gaming Plan which made a number of changes to the City's previous Gaming Ordinance. This was the result of a request made by Mr. Harvey Souza of the Village Club Cardroom. The new Gaming Plan allowed additional games to be played (Pai Gow and Super Pan 9) subject to certain restrictions. The new gaming plan also made modifications to increase the hours of operation, days of operation, maximum bets, and per table charges. Mr. Souza is now asking for additional changes to further liberalize the City Ordinance and Gaming Plan (Attachments A, B & C). Some of these items were requested but not granted in 1996. These changes include: · Permit the playing of all card games permitted by the Division of Gambling Control of the Department of Justice. · Consolidation of two 12 table cardroom licenses. · City waiver of the provision of the three year card club operation when moving from Class I (Poker) to Class II (Poker/Asian Gaming) License. Also, only one licensee must meet obligation when consolidating. /ð~/ Page 2, Item .l!2.... Meeting Date 01/13/98 · 24 hour operation vs. closing from 4:00 A.M. to 8:00 A.M. · Increasing the number of players at a table from 9 to 11. · No segregation of Class I and Class II tables. · Drinking of intoxicating liquor subject to City's land use regulation vs. prohibited by Gaming Plan. · Adding a security element to the Gaming Plan. In addition, we have received a request from Mr. Haig Kelegian requesting to transfer ownership of the license currently held by the Chula Vista Bay Club, Inc. to himself (Attachments D, E, F & G). He would then partner with Mr. Souza into one card club. The current Gaming Plan does not allow for such a transfer as the current license has never been placed into use. Mr. Souza's request for consolidation of his 12 table license with the requested 12 table license of Mr. Kelegian in one gaming operation in Chula Vista, a consolidation of the current four licenses, is not permitted in the Gaming Plan. Under the Gaming Plan the City of Chula Vista permits consolidation of two cardroom licenses permitting eight tables each into one license permitting twelve (12) tables. Mr. Souza's request would change the current Gaming Plan enabling the consolidation of the two current 12 card table licenses into one (I) license permitting twenty-four (24) tables under one consolidated license. His letter also requests a monopoly of gaming in Chula Vista in that no future cardroom licenses could be issued by the City of Chula Vista. Mr. Souza believes it would be advantageous for the City to have one large cardroom, although these advantages would seem to spring more to his benefit and his business associates than for the City. His request goes beyond consolidation and includes a request for a 24 hour a day, 365 days a year gaming operation which allows all card games legal in the State to be played. Mr. Souza strongly believes these changes are necessary to allow him to compete with the Indian gaming casinos which also have cardroom gaming, satellite race track betting, bingo and video gaming machines. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The issue of cardrooms in California has been subject to considerable political debate. Currently, cardrooms are regulated by the local governmental entity. New legislation creates a stronger foundation for enhanced controls at the state level. The City of Chula Vista developed the Chula Vista Gaming Plan instituted in February, 1996, in an effort to regulate cardrooms and address Mr. Harvey Souza's request for changes to the Ordinance. The assertion in Attachment B that the City ". . . will have lost the prospect of local control" if their proposals are not accepted is not accepted as valid by staff.) /¿;J·~2 Page 3, Item It;;> Meeting Date 01/13/98 Currently, a public vote is required before a City can permit card rooms in their jurisdiction; however, no public vote is required to expand existing cardrooms allowed by City Ordinance. Attorney General Dan Lungren, and others, have supported more control at the state level maintaining that local governments are not always equipped to regulate what has become a large sophisticated gaming industry in California. Large scale gambling in other states is regulated at the state level so that individual cities are not vulnerable to political pressures, influence peddling and bribery which has occurred in some jurisdictions. The latest statistical estimates are that the existing cardroom industry is an $8.4 billion dollar a year business. As a result, cardroom revenues overshadow the combined revenues of the other two forms (horse racing and State lottery) of legal gambling regulations by the State. The City of Chula Vista has historically allowed "mom and pop" sized cardrooms to operate in our city. Previous Councils felt that the "mom & pop" cardroom provided social and recreational opportunities to community members. In April, 1992 and December, 1995, the City Council reviewed and discussed requests by cardroom owners to modify days and hours of operation, games allowed and consolidation, as well as other issues. The hours of operation were expanded, days increased, and games allowed were increased on two occasions. However, Council was concerned about consolidation and did not approve requests to increase the number of tables under one roof. Over the years, even prior to 1992, part of the concerns were the projected image a major card club would have on Chula Vista as a "family oriented" community, the criminal element that a larger room would bring into the community, and the fear that if a larger room was brought in, with substantially more revenue than the City is now receiving to pay for enforcement costs, it would be difficult to "wean" the City from this revenue source if the card club needed to be closed. MATRIX (on next page) / If -:3 - - -- - "------_.._,-_. - <-- CD '" O)"C > _ C æ '0 _ .8 õ ....._ ca J::.... c: co.~ ca"CO)o~ c:::::J "C 7....~ ca 0)(5 tnæ,e:oQ)-c roO c:..... ,.... Q)ctI - J::~O)CL:': ca C't .......J::2:? ..c:J::Q) ctlO) _ ~c.. "ë .....~......OCD Q)~a..~~Q) -;æ::i5 -=~ o ~.... - 2t~.s-·> EO....a>.Qt:D ,;::;o.!9 CD'ëi. ~'" <> ~OÕI!! ",CJ2!.C>.t:'" <>O~ C>. !! r--CL. Z 8 s.o CD m·æ::::J.......o3: EaR OQ;, ;; ~ g a:g' ~D.-C/)~~ ~~ :a. m ch 0 & Q 11.. ~ ~ ~ o~ø E "C D -,w 0 Q) J!2 Oc: Q) -ê æ"æe Q)cn~ J!2 J5 ..0.....-::) - ....tQ..cn ...._0>_ .0 S(¡) .£9Q)gu.. ~m ~-ê§"C a -ê~fiiS .19..... .....æ: .....ffiO'E....1::: 8..n:sCTæ~ ctI .¡;sf"-.. ....m 8.:3 8.::::JLÔe 8.§ .....6-(ijm...... à-"':"C\.I,g 8.~ O~ O~~~ OCT 2i.....CLC:: ~ ....0 '0 82i. g CD g 2i(l)~" "'..... à> 0 ~~l1..ca¡;:.: æC'\lSim 0 _0. -::::J _CL 0 ...... to- .......('\10 - ..,.... ~ a-º ....... Ll) ~.... ~ER-~ ~ .... ~ "'.... N <:I>2!.õ .... ~ .... ::> <> W - C>. ::> r.ñ cñ <Ii ~~ ~~ ~~ .... <> _ J! <> .... <> øj- "ë cn,?- cn~ ._._ ~ (.> = Q) .::.c. ..92 (.) .~ E ..ens -°..eca ...J'- S·-' 0 ~-~ .£9-- ...J o Z.¡.:IO 0 0 0 Oc: oc: at: Z Z ~ ~ ~ "0"0 '" .c:.l!3_ J::$!- (I) (J) (I) ~ CD ~.{g~ :t::{gm ~æ ~c:: E o:)~=c: co3==c ..co ITI~ co ctI C'\IO~ ('\Jom 19= ~= en .......~._ ..,....~.g ....."'~ "'~ -8- -8- C>. ....2!. ~ ~ <> '-E Æ<.;' 0-- 0:) co - co a..ctS co <> 11.. :z C) <X> '" S '" SEE >- rn Cd ca>-. C"I ca xco Xco coca ..:.:: ìä' ~-g ~' m, '-g m~ E -g 5 ::> .~ E .~ E E ::> ~ ::> ctI'::::J .c:(J') (}:¡ca (;sco cacn (]se ......00 <0;1"1:: >o...::t~....... C\.I-c >.oJ:: -g-g C\.I 8. {g-o"C~ :;; m {g~ en (I) 0 r-- ~ r-- (/) ~..Q to- ..Q..Q O..Q 00 au ð () ð en G> ." C C) tV 0) .. ,Q) 0) O.c .. C::~ "C æ6 C: "C n:J en cn'O .æ 3: a.. C n:J cn'O cn'O .!!!~I1..C: Q)Q)Q) ·-0 -- ..11..3: Q)Q)Q) Q)( )Q) E ·-0·- E::::- ..cu,....:::JC'\I en 0 E::t::::- E::::- o =ºø....:::JC'\I n:J--.m :EY8.en~ c....ø ro·-oS n:J·-19 o -5-~2i.~~ enEen 2ëij:::Jæ"Cij :s8..~ O>Een O>Een .;, ....n:J:::Jn:Jn:J =:5Q)>- a..a..ena..() 'O:::Jn:J =Q)>- =:5Q)>- ¡¡ a..o...eno...() ...... a...c < en 0... < a...c ...... a...c o ~ - ~'" ~ 'Oæ ~Q) u ro( )(I) - a. >- U')Ct::cCC c~....cnctl'1:l~ o 19 ..c O')n:J:::J·-=:JB LOn:Jc~æ.s::.QI~ 0 ( ) ... ~ ro O)'OOC.s= o)u_co~c::. 0)>-'0>- a.. 5~ ~!:l~ '"'"':~êti~.~.- ~mctS:::J='C~fä _m~ (ñ~ .... m:;::;;. cnOO') >o......m:> en :>0'0"''''''''',,°., OQ) SQ) o "'5....~ :::Jen.- oa......o en oa. 0cn- _ t:: ."t::: - .c: CT _ zo~o.s.gctl zcn~~cn==co iij:::J~:::J >< () Q)::g èLen-:::JO ecao12Q1 æ enO 00 ::: a: ~ Gm: a..o....Qus. as ::E /v- 00 ~ C "'0 ." ." '" -0 ." ." ." ;z Co c:: ~ c:: ~ c:: c:: ~ '" . "'0> "'0> '" 0> c:: ~ '" 0> c:: ~ .r:::~ .r:::>. .r:::>. ~:a .:g~ .r::: >. "'0> - ~". ~ '" ~ '" ~ '" .r::: >. 0 lIS.õ lIS.ëi. lIS.ëi. lIS.~ ~ '" lIS.~ ~ '" '" OX 8~ o~ 2S.~ 2i~ '" ...,,,, 02S. 82S. ~~ ~8. :52i ~ ",E N ;;; Ii ". ". ". ". C '" 0> Z; 0> gj.m 0> Z; 0> :a~~ ::c..... ~ .m", :i5~ soe .m 0> 0 ~ '" .m'" "- 'C en 0>0 oEo> a. ~ ~~ '7è5õ 8.g¡....- 0>0> lIS.~ croo e>~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 0.... ::Æ ...,lIS. ~ 8. ~ "'''' z z z o;;~ .r:::~ ~ '" ~o '" <D 0 0 ". Z '" ". ;0 ~ 0 ~ O>e) -'" , '" 8. ,ij ~ e) X 0> S <n-..!... ~"- "'E X 0> '" ,g--- E '" "'E"- 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë ~~ 00> E 0= E '" c:: :::¡ :::¡ :::¡ :::¡ E ~ ",,,, o~~ 0 0 0 0 ". ~ 0- -- ollS. ,g ~"'~ z z z z 00 "'0 0 "'", Z ". ~ ~ ",$ ~~ "'$"i' ~;O-'" ;0 ;0 0> co 0> 0 ]i¿a~ _ 0 _ c:: :O~l? ~o~ .me) _C:: :i5¡'¡ -"'¡'¡ -"'¡'¡ o '? 3Z' ¡Q...!.. æ ,Q "ffi .m= .m= .m= m.2 "iij a.."iã m 11>8:"- ...,~ o ~ o~ 0-:: a.... 0"-", g~ "'lIS. "'2i co 2io ",'" "'lIS. ~ ~ "'co'" Z ;0 0 ~<? ~ ëij 0"- .... co co n...;::: C) C) C) ooª 0 Z '" '" ~ '" '" ~ '" ~ '" "'~ '" ~ '" ~ '" ~ >.~ >.~ >.~ >.~ >.~ >.~ >.~ ",0 '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 -o.r::: -o.r::: -o.r::: -0 .r::: -0 .r::: -0 .r::: -o.r::: .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ... C 8 <ñ .. "" C '" .r::: m"OQ) "'-0 "'-0 "'-0 '" '" '" U 0> 0> 0> i¥:ms ~~jg 0> 0> 0> E EO>_ ~""- E E E m-t; m "- .m "'.- .m co'- .£9 '" '" '" 0 o§ø o§cn °E(/) CflEØ 0> 0> 0> 0 - ;¡: 2i.ð' ;¡: lIS..ð' 4: 8-~ ;¡: lIS..ð' ;¡: ;¡: « .., - ð .., ~ 51 0 c:: "'- a. "g?5>- 55~>- 0 >. $>. '~y 'ê >. >. "'>. - 'E~= c::= "'= 0.. 0= 0= (t 0 55 '" c:: '" co c::= co c:: ~c:: Q) ~ ê e)()t= ~ 0> "- 0> e 55 - "'0> 0> .~ t:: .e @ t= c:: t= E 0> ~ §!.t= '" t= '" ~ UJE'" 'ä)~a CI)G > ~ m ~ u...~ CI)", '" '" '" .. '" m':' .¡: ~ i 10- S- -+--- -- _u.__..__.'..___ --.-.-....---.-------------.--,..----- Page 4, Item _ Meeting Date 01/13/98 Council modified the Ordinance/Gaming Plan in order to keep the small cardrooms competitive; however, the focus has always been to keep them small cardrooms. Consolidation of all licenses in Chula Vista will change the dynamics of card rooms from small "mom and pop" operations to corporate level operations. This is a major shift associated with Chula Vista cardrooms. The community is continuing to grow with significant expansion to the east with the ARCO Olympic Training Center. To the south the development of the water park and amphitheater and to the west with the bayfront development which has attracted considerable interest over the past several months. Is a consolidated cardroom the value added component meeting the Council's goals for development? Or would it actually be a detriment to the City's economic development efforts? Maybe it is more about the vision for Chula Vista as a family oriented community n does a large cardroom fit into that overall vision? Other Information . Two large card clubs exist in Los Angeles County. Both the Commerce Casino and the Bicycle Club have in excess of 200 card tables in their facility. The City of Commerce collected $13 million last year in feesltaxes and the City of Bell Gardens received $9.1 million on fees paid by the Bicycle Club. This fee equates to 13% of the gross revenues of the cardrooms. A new gaming club in San Jose, operating 40 tables, generates an annual gross revenue of $33 million with $4.3 million of that paid to the City of San Jose. The City of Chula Vista, under its current structure, would receive $240,000 per year in table taxes with a possible increase based on gross revenues. This could occur in two separate 12 table cardrooms or a consolidated 24 table club. . Crime and cardrooms have been significant reasons cities have opposed gambling in their communities. Currently, crime is not a factor in Chula Vista with an eight (8) table "mom and pop" cardroom. It is unknown, however, what the consequences of a 24 table, all games legal, around the clock cardroom might bring. A review of the literature on cardrooms and crime, coupled with interviews of law enforcement representatives, revealed the following: In a recent University of Illinois at Urbana study, Professor John Kindt found "that for every dollar obtained from gambling, cities paid out three for social services, public safety, and other problems created by the industry." In 1993, 14 people at a San Jose card club pled guilty to skimming $4 million in club revenues over an eight year period. In 1994, the independent contractor operating the Pai Gow tables at the Bicycle Club was sentenced to 12 1/2 years in Federal prison for conspiracy, loan-sharking and extortion. In 1995, a Sunnyvale woman reported a home invasion robbery. Responding officers noticed that the woman had six sets of car keys and six pink slips (titles) on the top of a dresser. Further investigation revealed she was conducting "loan sharking" at a San Jose card club. In November, 1996, two major cardrooms experienced Laotian and Thai females working as prostitutes out of motor homes in the parking lot of the clubs. The females, who had ties to Asian organized crime, targeted Vietnamese male patrons of the two clubs. /tJ/þ Page 5. Item _ Meeting Date 01/13/98 There is no way to know if a Chula Vista cardroom will encounter these specific types of criminal activity, but the industry is susceptible to crimes in these categories. particularly as it relates to larger cardrooms. Some are concerned the risk is not worth the possible positive municipal revenue, while others feel legislation coupled with strict enforcement will be able to ferret out these types of criminal activity. Cardroom Administration Management of the cardrooms is an important factor in dealing with potential crime that can occur inside the organization. Cardrooms are susceptible to "skimming," "kickbacks" and "syphoning" of funds for illegal use. Extortion, based on gamblers losses, as well as employees having to "pay" for lucrative assignments, is another challenge to be addressed by management and law enforcement. The current eight (8) table cardroom has not created an unmanageable operation for police. However, a cardroom three times the size automatically changes it from a "mom and pop" operation to an operation that heightens concern of law enforcement. Strict operating rules, coupled with land use planning and cooperative yet strong management, can lessen the negative impacts as identified in previous sections. This comes, however, with increased service demands on several City departments not the least of which is the Police Department. CONCLUSION: The Police Department has conducted an initial review of the requests from Mr. Souza and Mr. Kelegian. The review has included personal interviews with both principals, site visits at both the Village Card Club and the Ocean's 11 Club. Additionally, preliminary reviews and questioning have been started with other agencies throughout the state to determine their experience with the gaming issues. The initial review provided information that has been included in this report; however, additional information and data is being forwarded for review and analysis. That information has not been received at this time. Without all of the data it is difficult to determine the appropriate next step. Some cities are extremely happy with gaming, others have voted the issue down. What is abundantly clear is the need for specific local rules and ordinances to address the areas of potential criminal concern. Our initial reviews must be examined more thoroughly to determine the impacts of a consolidated cardroom in Chula Vista. The Police Department needs to investigate more closely several issues. These include but are not limited to: 1) crime and nuisance control outside of facilities; 2) criminal conduct inside the facility (money laundering/skimming/extortion); 3) organized crime influences; 4) auditing/accounting practices; and, 5) technology and its ability to monitor and uncover potential criminal activity. These issues have not been a problem with the "mom & pop" sized cardroom; however, have been issues in other areas and must be thoroughly examined to ensure they don't become problems here. ) tf-' 1 Page 6. Item _ Meeting Date 01/13/98 FISCAL IMPACT: Four licenses are currently owned; however, only eight tables are presently in operation. These eight tables generate $56,000 annually. Twenty-four tables licensed according to the Gaming Plan or in a consolidated fashion, would generate $240,000 in table tax. Additional monies would be paid to the City based on gross revenues incurred by a cardroom. However, the net impact to the General Fund is unknown at this time. The revenues would be offset by an increase in expenditures associated with service demands on City departments and the need for additional law enforcement of these establishments including potential criminal activity . Attachments: Attachment A - Letter from Village Club Card Room, dated 12/8/97 Attachment B - Letter from Village Club Card Room, dated 12/16/97 Attachment C - Memo from Michael Green, dated 12/22/97 Attachment 0 - Letter from Ocean's Eleven Casino, dated 12/30/97 Attachment E - Letter from Inglis, Ledbetter & Gower, dated 12/5/97 Attachment F - Agreement between Harvey Souza and Haig Kelegian, dated 12/1/97 Attachment G - Letter from Michael Green, Re: Harvey Souza application to consolidate (re) C:\wp51\.c.\.11~\cc.rdroo.113 [Jlnuary 8, 1998 (4:04pm) !tJ /~ /j \ // ,," ¡ RESOLUTION NO. ) '¡fJ"¿' .:2. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE CITY GAMING PLAN TO INCLUDE A SECURITY ELEMENT AND DENYING REQUEST FOR FURTHER MODIFICATION OF THE CITY GAMING PLAN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 5.20 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, at the City Council meeting of February 20, 1996, the City Council approved a Gaming Plan which made a number of changes to the City's previous Gaming Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the new Gaming Plan allowed additional games to be played (pai Gow and Super Pan 9) subject to certain restrictions and also made modifications to the hours of operation, days of operation, maximum bets, and per table charges; and WHEREAS, Mr. Harvey Souza of the Village Club Cardroom is now asking for additional changes to the City Ordinance and Gaming Plan (Attachments A, B & C); and WHEREAS, some of these items were requested but not granted in 1996. These changes include: · Permit the playing of all card games permitted by the Division of Gambling Control of the Department of Justice. · Consolidation of two 12 table cardroom licenses. · city waiver of the provision of the three year card club operation when moving from Class I to Class II License. Also, only one licensee must meet obligation when consolidating. · 24 hour operation vs. closing from 4:00 A.M. to 8:00 A.M. · Increasing the number of players at a table from 9 to 11. · No segregation of Class I and Class II tables. · Drinking of intoxicating liquor subject to City's land use regulation vs. prohibited by Gaming Plan. · Adding a security element to the Gaming Plan. and WHEREAS, in addition, a request has been received from Mr. Haig Kelegian requesting to transfer ownership of the license currently held by the Chula vista Bay Club, Inc. to himself (Attachments D, E, F & G) and he would then partner with Mr. Souza into one card club; and /¿?~ 7 ,Y / _____ - ___"m...._"_. .. ._._-_._--,---~------ -------------, WHEREAS, the current Gaming Plan does not allow for such a transfer as the current license has never been placed into use; and WHEREAS, Mr. Souza's request for consolidation of his 12 table license with the requested 12 table license of Mr. Kelegian in one gaming operation in Chula Vista, a consolidation of the current four licenses, is not permitted in the Gaming Plan; and WHEREAS, under the Gaming Plan the city of Chu1a Vista permits consolidation of two cardroom licenses permitting eight tables each into one license permitting twelve (12) tables; and WHEREAS, Mr. Souza's request would change the current Gaming Plan enabling the consolidation of the two current 12 card table licenses into one (1) license permitting twenty-four (24) tables under one consolidated license; and WHEREAS, his letter also requests that no future cardroom licenses be issued by the City of Chu1a vista because he believes it would be advantageous for the City to have one large cardroom and goes beyond consolidation and includes a request for a 24 hour a day, 365 days a year gaming operation which allows all card games legal in the State to be played; and WHEREAS, Mr. Souza strongly believes these changes are necessary to allow him to compete with the Indian gaming casinos which also have cardroom gaming, satellite race track betting, bingo and video gaming machines; and WHEREAS, staff recommends that Council deny the request and continue to follow the Gaming Plan instituted in February, 1996; and WHEREAS, changes in state law would indicate the appropriateness of a conforming change in the Gaming Plan's security element. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend section 3.14 of the City Gaming Plan to read as follows: "3.14 Operations in Accordance with an Approved Security Plan. All cardrooms operating morc thaR 8 tablcs under a Class I liccnsc sr opcratiRg Class II gamcs undcr a Class II liccnsc shall be operated in strict accordance with a security plan which has been submitted to and approved in advance of commencement of such operations by the Chief of Police. Every security plan shall include the following elements: (a) minimum qualifications of security personnel; (b) number of security personnel to be present; (c) schedule and locations for security personnel; (d) system for communication between / P-'/ f7 security personnel and the City pOlice department; and (e) any and all other provisions required by the Chief of Police in his sole discretion." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby deny the request for further modification of the City Gaming Plan pursuant to Chapter 5.20 of the Municipal Code. Presented by Approved as to form by Richard P. Emerson, Chief of Police C:\rs\ga~ing.amd j¿j/j) ------.- ..---- _.__._----_.._-_.~._------- ·kttQQ.~ Me ¡0 t q ;:/::1=/6 Village Club Card Room 429 Broadway Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 619/426-4542 December 8, 1997 Richard P. Emerson Hand Delivered Chief of Police City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Re: Amendment of Gaming Ordinance, Plan; Request for Approval of Consolidation Dear Chief Emerson: I am the owner of the Village Club Card Room. I hold a consolidated class II license which permits me to open a twelve table cardroom and operate certain Asian games, in addition to poker. There have been certain legislative changes, namely 588, which affect the future of my business. These changes also affect the ability of localities to determine the course of this business within their own jurisdictions. My request, described below, will give Chula Vista maximum flexibility under the law to deal with gambling issues. Reauest for chances in ordinance. At present, Chula Vista's ordinance permits consolidation of two cardroom licenses permitting eight tables each into on license permitting twelve tables. I request the ordinance be changed to permit the consolidation of two licenses permitting twelve tables into one license permitting twenty-four tables, and that the ordinance be further amended to provided that no further licenses will be issued. The advantages to the City would be several. It would only have to regulate one license and one cardroom. This cardroom would have the scale necessary to compete with other gambling establishments in the area. There should be a significant increase in City revenues from fees imposed by the ordinance. For a cardroom to succeed, there will have to be further modifications to Chula Vista's ordinance. First, a Club must be permitted to play all games legal in California. Secondly, the Iv r (3 i __on ---- -- -....------ . -------._.- Richard P. Emerson Chief of Police City of Chula Vista December 8, 1997 Page Two club must be permitted to operate twenty-four hours a day, 365 days a year. I request that these changes be made to the ordinance. With the above changes, I would be able to combine my license with the other license currently issued in Chula Vista. My goal is to create a gambling facility which will allow me to compete, to survive, and prosper. Reauest for further consolidation Enclosed with this letter are copies of the following agreements: 1. Agreement dated December 1, 1997 between me and Haig Kelegian. Under this Agreement, Kelegian is to enter an agreement with Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd., a holder of a twelve table license in Chula Vista, for the transfer of its license to him, then combine that license with mine. A new entity is to be formed in which I will have a controlling interest. This entity then will endeavor to open a new club. 2. Agreement dated December 5, 1997 between Haig Kelegian and Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. under which Mr. Kelegian has the right to acquire the license owned by Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. under certain terms, including the right of Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. to later acquire a twenty-five percent interest in the total entity from Mr. Kelegian and a first right of refusal as to his interest. Chula Vista's ordinance does not permit the transfer of a license that has not been used to operate a business for the previous three years. However, there is precedent for such a transfer. Also, the transfer is contingent on further consolidation with my license in an entity in which I will hold the controlling interest. Finally, I believe it wise to incorporate the existing gaming plan, which was adopted by resolution, into the proposed amendment to the ordinance. Due to constraints imposed by SB 8, it is necessary to accomplish these changes prior to December 31, 1997, or at least have the matter heard by the city Council prior to that date, so that the intent of the city Council is clear. It) - / i Richard P. Emerson Chief of Police City of Chula Vista December 8, 1997 Page Three Please feel free to discuss any aspect of this matter with my attorney, Michael A. Green, telephone (619) 425-4020. Sincerely, 4~ HARVEY SOU cc: Glen Googins, Deputy City Attorney II John Goss, City Manager !t) ~ (5 ----~-, ,. "-~.-.._.._,- . ,---~._------~.._---- frt't0(10 Mf!~-t 6 -f*/c; Village Club Card Room 429 Broadway Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 619/426-4542 December 16, 1997 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Hand Delivered City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Horton and Members of the Council: Last week I submitted an application to the city of Chula Vista requesting changes to the City's Gaming Ordinance. I asked that the matter be decided prior to December 31, 1997. I realize that my request was unrealistic in regard to timing. I now request that this matter be heard January 15, 1998, because: 1. The California Attorney General's Office has indicated that it will accept my application during January, 1998, even though a literal reading of Senate Bill 8 would seem to preclude this. 2. If I am unable to submit an application to the Attorney General's Office before January 31, 1998, Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. will no longer be bound to sell its license to Haig Kelegian. As a result, the City of Chula vista will continue to have two licenses to regulate and will have lost the prospect of local control. 3. Any subsequent proposal might take a year or more for approval by the State due to regulatory changes. It is unfortunate that staff will have less time to analyze this proposal than would be desirable. However, my understanding is that the Police Department has made a great effort to become familiar with gambling issues and should be able to address the matter quickly. The actual changes to the ordinance would be few and the City has evaluated related matters frequently enough that staff is familiar with most of the issues. Also, Haig Kelegian, the person I hope to combine with, is currently licensed by the State of California to operate a cardroom in Oceanside. Therefore, the background check should be simplified. /0 -/¿;; ____.__u____ __ __ ____._._.......___ The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Chula Vista December 16, 1997 Page Two Let me remind you that my proposal would not increase the number of tables authorized in Chula Vista. My proposal would put control in local hands and would allow me to survive in what has become a very competitive business. Please direct that my proposal be considered January 15, 1998. EY SOUZA cc: Glen Googins, Deputy City Attorney II John Goss, City Manager Richard P. Emerson, Chief of Police I It) - /7 .... . "___.________ _ _ m··_._..._.__~____~_._______~_~ /l't 't Q.. (! It ¡VI (0 tSé CL- fr(Ò MICHAEL A. GREEN ATTORNEY AT LAW 227 Third Avenue CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 9191Q.-2710 16191 425-4020 FAX (6191 425-4879 - . - . - -- - -- - -':- . -.2 Memorandum To: Glen Googins From: Mike Green Date: December 22, 1997 Subject: Gaming plan Glen: The proposed gaming plan is found on the disk as GAMING2.PLN. A redlined draft is enclosed. MG ICJ - (~ _n_ _'_"M_'U --...-. Exhibit A CHULA VISTA GAMING PLAN In accordance with Chapter 5.20 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (the "Gaming Code"), this document shall serve as the gaming plan for the City of Chula Vista (the "Gaming Plan"). This Gaming Plan was adopted on February 13, 1996, after a public hearing, pursuant to city council Resolution No. 18212. Effective upon its adoption, this Gaming Plan shall implement, in its entirety, Subchapter 2 of the Gaming Code. In the event of any inconsistency between this Gaming Plan and the Gaming Code, the terms and conditions of this Gaming Plan shall govern. Except to the extent that this Gaming Plan expressly modifies or is otherwise inconsistent with the Gaming Code, the Gaming Code shall remain in full force and effect. This Gaming Plan is intended to deal only with the subject of cardrooms. No other types of gaming permitted by the code, subject to the adoption of a gaming plan with respect thereto, shall be permitted or governed hereby. To be permitted, such other types of gaming must be the subject of further action by resolution of the city council to amend or add to this Gaming Plan. CARDROOMS 1. Cardroom Defined. For the purpose of this Gaming Plan, a "cardroom" is defined to be any space, room or enclosure furnished or equipped with a table or tables used or intended to be used, either exclusively or in. conjunction with another business or activity, as a card$pºm table for the playing of cards and similar games, and the ûse=of which is available to the public. 2. Licensinq. 2.1 License Reauired to OÐerate Cardroom -- Individual Licensee's Must be 21 Years or Older. A license from the city issued pursuant to the Gaming Code or this Gaming Plan, is required for any person, group of persons, partnership, corporation, or any other entity or organization (each a "Person" hereinafter) to engage in or carryon, or to maintain or conduct, or cause to be engaged in, carried on, maintained or conducted, any cardroom in the city. Any such activity conducted without such a license, or otherwise in non- compliance with the terms of the Gaming Code, this Gaming Plan, or any and all other applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations shall be unlawful. No license shall be issued to any ! 1 //Y - (q . --- - -~---_._,_..~.,-- ~-, ,----, ",'----". , individual Person under the age of twenty-one years. 2.2 Number of Licenses Permitted -- Existinq Licenses. The number of licenses authorized to be issued or held, in the aggregate, under the provisions of this Gaming Plan shall be limited, based upon the population of the city according to the certified determination thereof by the state department of finance. The number of licenses so authorized may not be more than one per forty thousand (40,000) residents or any fraction thereof. All such licenses shall be issued and held in accordancè with the provisions of this Gaming Plan; provided, however, any Person holding a license or licenses to conduct cardroom operation upon the effective date of this Gaming Plan may continue to hold such license or licenses subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. For purposes of determining the number of licenses which are authorized to be issued by the city hereunder, any ~ licenses which are "consolidated" pu!,~uant to ^.3.~ction 2:.!i ..hereof shall still be treated as bein $1i.MTõr~~~g¡Wmaèï:iWõf tue se ante licenses counted againstgtÊ~~¥~t~'~nn~~¥~~œ£R8¥ized. ~ 2.3 TVDes of Licenses -- Class I and Class II. 2.3.1 There shall be two types of cardroom licenses: Class I and Class II. The characteristics, rights, obligations and limitations attributable, respectively, to a Class I or Class II licenses are set forth throughout this Gaming Plan. Subject to all such provisions, in general, (a) a Class I license shall permit the playing of all games permitted by the state attorney general as of December 31, 1995 to be within the permissible subject of local licensing by California cities, exceut Super Pan 9, Pai Gow, California 22, panguingue, and any and all similar games; and (b) a Class II license shall permit the playing of all i~:e:I~~r:~t:~à£:8::rp:8c~a=:àIp~te~:~~'~~~Rr~~ijIT~~~¡¡~~ii lil!¡llìllfErlliilllll!lillll¡tièæ:i;~,ß~j~t~~.ªætti~il;I~Öli~~~Blf~i, 2.3.2 All licenses issued by the city shall initially be Class I licenses. In order to convert a Class I license into a Class II license the holder of a Class I license (a) must have continuously operated a cardroom under its Class I license within the city for a period of three (3) years at a fixed location; and (b) must apply with the city and receive prior approval from the city for such conversion in accordance with the application procedures set forth in Section 2.4 hereof, below. 2.4 AÞÞlication/Issuance Procedure. 2.4.1 Any Person desiring a cardroom license must submit an application therefor to the chief of police. Such application 2 ! /èu-Ze) ----- ~--.._~--,--,,----- ---.._----- ----.------ shall be on a form issued by, or otherwise approved in advance by, the chief of police. Such application shall include, in addition to any other information required by the chief of police, (a) the true names and addresses of any and all Persons currently, or contemplated to have a "financial interest" in the cardroom operation proposed to be licensed; (b) the past criminal record, if any, of any and all such Persons; (c) the fingerprints of any and all such Persons; (d) the proposed location of the cardroom; and (e) a non-refundable fee, as presently designated, or as may in the future be amended, in the Master Fee Schedule, to cover the cost of processing the application and of any required investigation of the applicant. Upon the issuance of a cardroom license, the chief of police may authorize the refund of the investigation portion of the application fee to any Persons who were not subject to investigations. 2.4.2 Each cardroom license application shall be totally independent and unassociated with any other application being submitted for the purpose of obtaining such a license. No applicant requesting a license pursuant to this section may have a financial interest, or any other interest (as described in section 2.4.3 hereof) in any other cardroom license, or application pending therefor. 2.4.3 For purposes of this Section 2.4 and the Gaming Plan, the term "financial interest" shall mean any and all direct or indirect ownership, creditor or other interests in a cardroom license, the cardroom business operated thereunder, the assets thereof, or the revenues generated thereby. Such an interest shall include, without limitation, any and all interests held by building owners, landlords, tenants, equipment or fixtures owners, lessors or lessees, creditors, lenders or guarantors related in any way to the ownership, financing or operation of the cardroom; and (b) a parent, spouse, sibling or child of an individual Person holding a direct, majority or controlling ownership interest in a license or cardroom shall also be deemed the holder of a "financial interest" for purposes of this Section and this Gaming Plan. 2.4.4 Any new or revoked cardroom license otherwise qualified for issuance may be issued during the period of May 1 through June 30 following the availability or revocation date of such a license. After the expiration of this period no further licenses shall be issued until the following May 1 through June 30 period. In the event that there are applications in excess of the number of licenses available in accordance with the limitations set forth in Section 2.2 hereof, a license may by issued to the most qualified of such applicants in accordance with a procedure established by the city. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city shall decide, in its sole discretion, as to whether to issue any cardroom license authorized hereunder, and whether or how to condition such an issuance; furthermore, the city reserves the 3 IÒ r Z ( -..-..- ,. "---...-. -"._~_.._..._..._._~_._-_...~~-- ......--.-.-,,---....--.- right, for any reason whatsoever, to reject any and all applications for a cardroom license hereunder. 2.5 Transfers. 2.5.1 Any license issued pursuant to the Gaming Code or this Gaming Plan, a cardroom operated thereunder, or any direct or indirect interest therein, may be transferred, but only in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of this Section 2.5. Transfers governed by this section shall include, without limitation, any and all sales, leases, conveyances, assignments, grants, pledges, gifts, devises, donations and/or similar transfers by a Person of any or all of such Persons, direct or indirect, ownership interest in a license or cardroom operated thereunder, or "financial interest" in a license or cardroom operated thereunder, as such concept is defined in Section 2.4.3 hereof. Such transfers shall include, without limitation, (a) a transfer of all or any shares by a shareholder in a corporate licensee; (b) the transfer of all or any partnership interest by a partner in a partnership licensee; (c) the transfer of all or any portion of a controlling shareholder or partnership interest in an entity which itself holds a direct or indirect ownership or financial interest in a license or cardroom; and (d) a transfer of a substantial portion of the assets of a Person holding a license or a cardroom operated thereunder. 2.5.2 A license may only be transferred to a Person that submits an application for approval by the city and receives approval from the city in accordance with the procedures set forth for the issuance of a licenses set forth in Section 2.4 hereof. 2.5.3 Any and all proposed cardroom license transfers must receive (a) prior written approval of the chief of police, which approval may be withheld in the sole discretion of the chief of police, and (b) the ratification of the city council, which ratification may be withheld in the sole discretion of the city council. Such approval and/or ratification may be conditioned as the acting parties deem appropriate, and may be based, but is not required to be based, entirely or in part on the assessment by the chief of pOlice or, as applicable, the city council, of the character of the proposed licensee, or on the opinion of the approving or ratifying entity, that there appears to be good cause why such Person should not operate a cardroom. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a transfer directly caused by the death or divorce of a Person holding a financial interest in a license, the "prior approval" requirement, above, shall be amended to require that approval of the resulting transferee be obtained by no later than sixty (60) days following the death or divorce causing such transfer. 2.5.4 With the exception of those licenses which have been issued prior to September 1, 1992, no license may be transferred 4 !¿/~ZZ- ._'^- _p __u_~,_._......____ unless and until the holder thereof has been operating a cardroom governed by such license for three (3) years at a fixed location in the city. Licenses issued prior to September 1, 1992 may not be transferred unless and until the holder thereof has been operating a cardroom governed by such license for one (1) year at 2.5.5 In the event of a purported transfer of a license which does not comply with the terms of this Section (a) the purported transferror shall be subject to monetary penalties as provided in Section 4.2 hereof; (b) the purported transferee shall have no rights to operate a cardroom in the city under the authority of such license; (c) the license involved shall be subject to revocation by the city as provided in Section 4.3 hereof; and (d) the transfer may otherwise be declared null and void. 2.5.6 Upon transfer of a Class II license, the Class II license so transferred shall immediately revert back to a Class I license. A Class II license so reverted may be converted back to a Class II license, but only in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.3.2 hereof. 2.6 Consolidation. 2.6.1 Notwithstanding any other section of this Gaming Plan to the contrary, the holder of a Class I or Class II license may acquire one, but only cine, additional Class I or Class II License, subject to the consolidation rules and procedures of this Section 2.6. URdcr R8 eireuH\stanccs may aflj" ,rcrsal~. aeEluire: '::::;;:;;.;.;;;;x;:::;;:;:;::::>;;.:::;:.:;::::::::::;::;:.;::::;¡;»::;:::~; 2.6.2 In order to acquire an additional license 9~0Ç9 ·······"·-..····'··;.;··········':1j'"·"····-..············-. ,,'.........,.......- ¢ºn$º';¡;ª~t;èi, an existing license holder (a) must hàiïe" contInuously operated a cardroom under its existing license within the city for a period of three (3) years at a fixed H!ij!ii'!fl!II!"~1'li!i~!:~~'!l~!!:!~!!~!,~!~!~!:!!'¡!'(l~ß acquisition in accordance with the rules and procedures set forth in Section 2.4 hereof regarding the initial issuance of licenses. If the additional license is to be acquired from another existing license holder, such application shall also be made in accordance 5 (e) - c 3 with the rules and procedures governing license transfers set forth in Section 2.5.3 hereof. 2.6.3 If an application for the acquisition of an additional license is granted, the ~ licenses held by the applicanGY~~ shall become "consolidated". In addition, licenses shall be~~ deemed to be "consolidated" in the event that the same Person holds, or comes to hold, a "financial interest" (as defined in Section 2.4.3 thereof) in such licenses or the cardrooms operated thereunder. Under a consolidated license, the maximum number of ïitijJBijì¡ìii,ili·~iil:i!i~ii.~ji,'i!"'f'IJt.JI~g terms and cond~t~ons set forth in Sect~on 3.5 and/or other provisions of this Gaming Plan. All tables operated under a consolidated license must be operated in the same location. 2.6.4 In the event that a Class I license is consolidated with a Class II license, the full benefits and burdens hereunder of Class II status shall apply to all the card tables operated under such consolidated license. 2.7 License Tax. 2.7.1 rn General. There shall be a license tax imposed on any licensed cardroom within the city in accordance with the terms of this Section 2.7. The license tax is imposed for purposes of generating revenues to the general fund of the city and is not imposed for purposes of regulation. The tax shall be imposed against the number of tables licensed, based upon the class of license issued with respect thereto, regardless of the number of tables which may be operated on any given day or the class of game conducted thereon. 2.7.2 Amount of Tax -- Greater of Base or Gross Revenues Rate. The license tax to be assessed and collected on each licensed cardroom shall be the qreater of the applicable "base rate" tax per table, or the applicable "adjusted gross revenue rate" tax per table, if any, determined as follows: 2.7.2.1 Base Rate: a. Class I -- Non-consolidated: The base license tax for card tables licensed under a single, non-consolidated Class I license shall be (1) $1,500 per card table per quarter for a cardroom authorized to operate six (6) days per week; and $1,750 per card table per annual quarter for a cardroom authorized to operate seven (7) days per week. b. Class I -- Consolidated: The base license tax for card tables licensed under a consolidated Class I license shall be $2,500 per card table per annual quarter. 6 Jð-L'I' .........u_..._____....______ - "'___'..___'.____ ____._______,._ u_'._. c. Class I -- Greater Than $3 Charge Per Hand: Notwithstanding the foregoing, at such time that this Gaming Plan approves and the licensee charges in excess of three dollars ($3.00) per table per hand, the base license tax for such Class I card tables shall be $4,000 per card table per annual quarter. d. Class II: The base license tax for each card table licensed to play Class II games under a Class II license shall be $4,000 per table per annual quarter. For example, if a single non- consolidated Class I license is converted to a Class II License, the base rate for 6 of the 8 licensed tables shall be determined by the applicable Class I rate, and the base rate for the remaining 2 tables shall be the Class II base rate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that no games are conducted at a table operated under a Class II license for an entire quarter, that table shall be treated as a Class I table for purposes of this Section 2.7. 2.7.2.2 Adjusted Gross Revenues Rate: a. calculated for Both Class I and Class II Tables: If the mean average "adjusted gross revenues" (defined below) per quarter per table for Class I tables, on the one hand, or Class II tables (if any), on the other hand, exceeds $60,000 per table, an adjusted gross revenues tax per table per quarter shall be determined for each Class of tables with such an average, based upon the following rates: Gross revenues UD to: Tax rate: $70,000 7.00% $80,000 7.25% $100,000 7.50% With an additional 0.25% tax for each additional $100,000 or fraction thereof in adjusted gross revenues per table per quarter, up to a maximum rate of 10%. Any applicable rate shall be applied on the aggregate amount of adjusted gross revenues generated per table; in other words, the applicable rate shall not be applied in combination with other rates as a marginal rate. b. Revenues Not Attributable to a Class I or Class II Table: In any case in which a portion of the adjusted gross revenues cannot be allocated directly to either Class I or Class II games, these revenues shall be divided between the two classes based on the proportion of maximum allowable players per class of games as licensed at that establishment. For example, if a cardroom has nine poker tables (Class I) and three pai Gow tables (Class II), the maximum number of poker players would be 81 and the maximum number of Pai Gow players would be 84. Thus, in this case, the 7 It/ -c?S .-...-. ~---- ..-...-..--.-... Class I tables would be allocated 49.09% of the non-game-specific adjusted gross revenue and the Class II tables would be allocated 50.91% of the non-game-specific adjusted gross revenue. c. Definition of Adjusted Gross Revenues: Adjusted gross revenues shall be defined to include all revenues received by the license holder from per hand money collected, seat rental fees, and any and all other revenues generated from or attributable to card play, except fees charged to players that are returned to the players through approved direct promotions, subject to any applicable state and/or city restrictions on such promotions. Adjusted gross revenues shall be calculated separately for Class I and Class II Games. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Section 2.7 to the contrary, any table which is not in use at any time for an entire quarter shall not be considered in the calculation of adjusted gross revenues per table per quarter for the other tables and shall itself be assigned an adjusted gross revenue figure for that quarter of $0. 2.7.3 Procedures for Payment of Tax. 2.7.3.1 Advance Payment. The license tax assessed hereunder shall be payable quarterly in advance by no later than the day falling fifteen (15) days prior to the first day of each calendar quarter. For the first three (3) quarters of any cardroom operation, the minimum advance payment amount shall be the applicable base license tax applicable thereto. For each quarter thereafter, the minimum advance payment amount shall be the mean average of the license tax amounts which were determined by the city to be ultimately due and payable to the city with respect to the most recent previous two quarters for which such data is available. 2.7.3.2 Reconciliation Payment. By no later than the date falling thirty (30) days after the expiration of each calendar quarter, a licensee hereunder shall submit to the finance director, in a form approved thereby (a) a verified statement of the adjusted gross revenues generated during such quarter, and (b) licensee's request for reimbursement from the city, or licensee's payment of any additional amounts owed, as appropriate, determined by licensee based upon such statement of adjusted gross revenues. The finance director shall have the authority to designate an alternate payment procedure to ensure timely collection of all amounts due. 2.7.4 Audit Rights. In the event that the city disagrees with any verified statement of adjusted gross revenues submitted pursuant to Section 2.7.3.2, above, the city shall notify licensee in writing of such disagreement and, at city's request, licensee shall submit to an independent audit by the city, or its designee, of licensee's accounting records in order to verify such statement. In the event that the city determines that 8 /¿) - 2b " ~.. ._u _. __ __ _____ __ __~___.____ ____._.,_~'_.__H.__"__.._ licensee's verified statement understates adjusted gross revenues, licensee shall be immediately required to submit payment of the difference to the city. If such discrepancy exceeds a factor of five percent (5%), then (a) licensee shall be deemed to be in violation of the Gaming Plan, and (b) in addition to licensee's obligation to immediately pay the discrepancy, licensee shall be required to pay the city's costs in conducting its audit hereunder. 2.7.5 Tax Receipt. The finance director shall issue a receipt for each licensed cardroom and such receipt shall be displayed on the premises during the full term for which such receipt was issued. 3. OÐeratinq Limitations and Conditions. 3.1 ~~!~§~: City Land Use Reaulations Shall Control. A±± whl!m1bðitr$Qñgõ~Yã14 cardrooms and card table operations shall be sUb'j'ê'c't''''t'ô'''''Ehe'c'lt'ý''ls land use regulations. Notwithstanding any provision in this Gaming Plan to the contrary, no cardroom operations shall be permitted without the prior acquisition of any and all necessary approvals and permits from the city in connection therewith, and any cardroom operation with such approvals and permits shall operate in strict compliance with any and all terms and conditions thereof. 3.2 Games Permitted. 3.2.1 Class r License: Subject to the terms and conditions of this Gaming Plan and the Gaming Code, the holder of a Class I cardroom license shall be permitted to operate a cardroom which conducts all card games which were determined by the attorney general as of December 31, 1995 to be within the permissible subject of local licensing by California cities, except that Super Pan 9, Pai Gow, California 22, Panguingue and any and all similar games may not be played. The games permitted under this section shall be referred to herein from time to time as "Class I Games". 3.2.2 Class rr License: Subject to the terms and conditions of this Gaming Plan and the Gaming Code, the holder of a Class II cardroom license shall be permitted to operate a cardroom which conducts all card games permitted by a Class I lieeRse (as àcserieeà iR EeÐ~ieß 3.2.1, ass7e,) ~lHa E~p£r Paß 9 âRà Pai Caw. EUP£F PaR 9 aF1à Pai Ceu shall se referred t.a Þic1:'ein _ ,frem t.~JBe:.,te:i gi¡¡iii~if1ai¡!~~ii11ii¡¡'gil'lliJllilllli'llillllllrll.~~*¡¡¡~J 3.2.3 Posting of Permitted Games -- Game Being Played. There shall be posted in every cardroom in letters plainly visible from all parts thereof, signs stating which games have been approved i I 9 /ò' 27 I ----- --'-'~'---.'-'---~- --. .,.---.......,...-.-.. for play at said cardroom. In addition to the foregoing, each table shall identify by prominent sign located thereon the game which is currently being played at said table. 3.3 Game Rules. 3.3.1- In General. No permitted game may be played in a cardroom unless and until a written set of rules ("Games RUles") for such a game has been submitted to the chief of police and approved thereby. Said approval may be amended, conditioned or revoked from time to time in the sole discretion of the chief of police. Each and every permitted game must, at all times, be played strictly in accordance with the approved and posted Game Rules applicable thereto. Variations of a game, unless specifically described in the Game Rules, shall not be allowed. 3.3.2 Posting or Game Rules. A copy of the approved Game Rules showing thereon the approval of the chief of police shall be posted in the cardroom in a conspicuous place readily available to the patrons or prospective patrons and visible from any seat at any card table on the premises. 3.4 Hours and Davs or ODeration. Licensed cardrooms may operate £W~4f6U~*fi6HEsf~~Eia~ seven days per week, except that AS ea:r~reê;···âì\âIí~~Ä~p1r~ãtê~, aRå Be earà tasle:. lisE:.Rse:.el 1.iRåe:.r the pre7isießs af tRie seà£:. ¡'lhieh is maiRtaiReel SF eperateel iR eeRReetieR wi~h aRJ ether s~siResa ~~~i: ~e aseà ier aft~ earà :a;ä4~~~1OO!~~~!-€í;1~~~0:'~)1f,,~~~ht ¡ñ;Jîii~,ri~¡~li~&iij¡j1iii¥ii$g~(r~t:£L;jL9Bg~~LL;gPifigF,~t¡1Mf",,~~··.·····.·.··\.e 3.5 Maximum Number or Tables. 3.5.1 Class I -- Non-Consolidated. The maximum number of tables permitted under a single, non-consolidated Class I license shall be eight (8) . 3.5.2 Class I -- Consolidated. The maximum number of tables permitted under a consolidated Class I license shall be twelve ... ~ê¡~dlll"I;!II¡llili1IBS9¡j!±læŠ!œ~£§l\;¡äñ:9¡!¡Œ'!IîÉîT¡Ê9Hæ;~*~~¡~gªf¡¡~9HÊ 3.5.3 Class II -- Non-Consolidated. The maximum number of tables permitted under a single, non-consolidated Class II license shall be eight (8) ; as,;e·..cr, aBly t·...·s (2) af the eitg'ht (8) lieeRscel tasles shall Be ~crmit~cel a~ ãRY aRe time te eSRàuet Class II Camca. 3.5.4 Class II -- Consolidated. The maximum number of tables permitted under a consolidated Class II license shall be ei~Rt twe¡(V'ê' (12) . hs\w·c·:cr I aptly three (3) sf the t1.¡el-:e (12) lieeP1seå ·:X::::::::;;;:;;:~:~~~::::::~:::~:; , 10 j¿J-??f ' I) ¡Oc .._-~."-~------ - --- _.~,._"-, -_.'-'....._-- i¡iii;iiÎiììIiÎlliiiìì¡i¡~1¡~i~i~¡iJi~¡i¡iw~i.Bi¡i~¡fJ1ili;~_¡9~k_~ IIIJ'11'111.'[Cllfjilllllll$\\¡'~&~IM$Æ.î!E9è1f1~~%ii~t1~ 3.6 Maximum Number o~ Players Per Table. 3.6.1 Class I Tables. No more than RiRe (9)ill~ì£t.'Æ1 players shall be permitted at anyone card table conduëtlng'Cläss I Games. 3.6.2 Class n: Tables. No more than seven (7) seated players with three additional standing players per seat, for a total of twenty-eight (28) players per table shall be permitted at anyone card table conducting Class II Games. 3.7 Maximum Bets and Bettinq Rules. 3.7.1 Class I Games. No bet or wager in any Class I Game shall exceed the sum of eighty dollars ($80). Only table stakes shall be permitted. }fa jaeJt~ets shall se alle-.lcà. 3.7.2 Class II Games. There shall be no limit on bets or wagers in any Class II Game except that only table stakes shall be permitted. 3.8 Maximum House Charqes Per Hand -- Postinq Reauired. 3.8.1 Class I Games. No charge in excess of three dollars ($3.00) per hand per table shall be collected by a cardroom operator from any players for the privilege of participating in any Class I Game. Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective January 1, 1998, the maximum charge allowed shall be increased to a maximum of four dollars ($4.00) per hand per table for Class I Games. 3.8.2 Class II Games. No charge in excess of one percent (1%) of each one hundred dollars ($100) wagered shall be collected from any player for the privilege of participating in any Class II Game. 3.8.3 Posting Required. A copy of all schedules of house charges shall be provided to the police chief and shall be clearly posted in each licensed cardroom. 3.9 Work Permits and Identification Badqes Reauired For Manaqers and EmÞlovees. 3.9.1 Work Permit Required. Prior to commencing work at a cardroom, each proposed manager or employee of a cardroom, if 11 I /¿)r 2-9 1_" f I i _..._._......~- -"----...- ----.--.- -.-.- such Person is other than the Person or Persons whose names appear on the application for the cardroom license, must obtain a work permit from the chief of police. 3.9.2 Application Process. Each proposed manager or employee shall submit an application for the required work permit to the chief of police. Such application shall be on a form issued by, or otherwise approved in advance by, the chief of police. Such application shall include, in addition to any other information required by the chief of police, (a) the past criminal record, if any, of such Person; (c) the fingerprints of such Person; and (d) a non-refundable fee, as presently designated, or as may in the future be amended, in the Master Fee Schedule for cardroom applications, to cover the cost of processing the application and of any required investigation of the applicant. The work permit, when issued, shall be valid for one (1) year. Any renewal must also be approved by the chief of police. The chief of pOlice may deny the initial approval or renewal of a work permit if, in the chief of police's opinion, (1) in the case of a proposed manager the applicant therefor should not be permitted to act as manager or employee in lieu of management by the licensee of the cardroom; and (2) in the case of a proposed employee the applicant therefor should not be permitted to be employed in a cardroom. 3.9.3 Identification badges to be worn. Every manager and employee of a cardroom shall, at all times when present in such cardrooms, wear an identification badge containing such Person's photograph, age, address and description of such individual. 3.10 Drinkina of intoxicatina beveraaes ÐrBhihi~ed. The drinking of any intoxicating liquor in a cardroom by any Person in the cardroom is prshihiteà. Tàe liecß~~e af a earàraam ¡i;¡i¡i¡iiE~~i¡;.~~t:s:~~t!:: iiiiiii~¡¡~i¡~iB¡iÊi¡iiii.~¡tl!~! 3.11 Minors Ðrohibited from Ðatronaae or emÐlovment. No person under twenty-one years of age shall be permitted to play any game at any card table in the city. No person under twenty-one years of age shall be employed where any card table is maintained in the city. 3.12 Sians to be Posted. Licensee shall comply at all times with the sign requirements set forth in this Gaming Plan including, without limitation, Sections 3.2.3, 3.3.2 and 3.8.3 hereof, and any and all other signage or posting requirements contained in applicable federal, state or local laws, rules and regulations. 12 /¿? -3ò . -~"~~-_.__..."-----.._,-_. 3.13 ¢êr~fti Class XX Games to be Played Only at Cordoned o~~ Tab 1 es·;'''··,w......,,,w. . . .. .... All cardroom areas to be used for Class II gaming IiitffGm:~~¡£ !~i!~'lr~~~!'I!"~!%1i!~l'!'f!'.fJ~'!'''d s~;~~ ~~e r~l:~~-I ' il!~ gaming areas. All individuals w~thin such Class II gaming areas other than cardroom employees, c~ty regulatory or enforcement staff or uniformed security personnel who are working within the scope of their employment shall be considered players at the table for purposes of compliance with the maximum number of players allowed ~a~Eru$fi~ provisions of Section 3.6 hereof. .»;.:.»;«:;:~:-:';.;::;:~:;.;.;.:.:.:<.:-»:::.::»: '?;¡~3i¡@8eêùr3;t^~iiF""'r¡'tifBñsHìti(j{ã&õrð'ãHce;¡wf£H¡¡t>'"W);"''''rõvêðiW :!!~~!!:~!.:'~!.!~!.!....,.,...,.,'Ú,......,.".,.....ú..'"·",··,·,·,·"'",·,·"·,..·"·"",·,,,,,,«w.·.·.'·'..m..w'.·',"""'''''''''''.''''''.''''''''''''''=''''''''''''''''.'''ú"..,.....,.,.,«.'..'M"V~«".. ~ 3.15 Licensee ResDonsible for ComDliance and SUDervision of ODerations. The licensee of a cardroom shall be responsible for assuring that any cardroom operated under such license is operated in strict compliance with the terms of this Gaming Plan, the provisions of the Penal Code of the state of California and any and all other applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, or permits. All cardrooms and/or card tables shall be supervised by the operator or an employee of the operator of the cardroom, to assure such compliance. Any violation of the cardroom operating limitations and conditions in this Section 3, or elsewhere in the Gaming Plan, whether or not caused by the licensee or any employee thereof, shall be considered a violation by the licensee of the terms and conditions of its license, and therefore subject to the city's enforcement rights and policies set forth in Section 4 hereof. 4. Enforcement. 4.1 In General. 13 i /¿) -3/ , , .._._-.--" _._-------~-_.- ....---- - It is unlawful and a violation of this Gaming Plan to obtain, transfer or consolidate a cardroom license, or to operate a cardroom in violation of any of the regulations and rules set forth in the Gaming Code, this Gaming Plan, and any and all other applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations or permits. 4.2 Monetarv Fines. 4.2.1 Amounts of Fines. For any violation of the terms of this Gaming Plan, the city shall have the right to impose a penalty of up to $1,000 per day for each day the licensee is in violation. In the event that a licensee is cited for a violation (not necessarily the same violation) more than three (3) times within a 6 month period, upon the fourth such citation, and with respect to any occurrence thereafter, the city shall have the right to impose a penalty of up to $5,000 per day the licensee is in violation. 4.2.2 Imposition of Fine Not Election of Remedies. The pursuit of monetary fines against a licensee or the receipt of payment therefor shall not constitute an election of remedies on the part of the city and thus shall not preclude any other course of action such as may be available including, without limitation, the revocation of the cardroom license held or issued hereunder, the revocation of any and all permits or approvals permitting the operation of the cardroom, and any and all other remedies available to the city at law or in equity. 4.3 Revocation and SusDension. 4.3.1 City Right to Revoke or Suspend. Any cardroom license issued or held hereunder may be revoked or suspended by the city, after a public hearing, upon the determination by the city council and the chief of police that with respect to the license and/or cardroom operated thereunder, there has been a material violation, or repeated violations of this Gaming Plan or any or all other applicable federal, state or local laws, rules, regulations or permits. 4.3.2 Material Violation. The city shall determine, in its sole discretion, what shall constitute a material violation for purposes of revocation or suspension under this section 4.3. Material violations may include, without limitation, the following: (a) A misrepresentation or exclusion on any application for approval, report or statement of revenues required to be submitted under this Gaming Plan or under any other applicable federal, state or local law, rule, regulation or permit. (b) A non-complying purported transfer of a cardroom 14 I?J r32 license held or issued hereunder. (c) Allowing persons other than those named in the application on file with the city to own an interest in, or have direct management of a cardroom. (d) Maintaining a greater number of tables than the number permitted by the license. (e) Failure to strictly comply with any and all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and permits applicable to the holding of a license or the operation of a cardroom hereunder, including, without limitation local land use and other code provisions. (f) Failure to pay, when due, the amount of license tax owed pursuant to Section 2.7 hereof. (g) Citation of five (5) or more minor violations of this Gaming Plan within any twelve (12) consecutive months. (h) The conduct of criminal or dangerous activities at or attributable to the licensed cardroom. (i) Failure to pay, when due, the amount of any monetary fine imposed pursuant to Section 4.2.1 hereof. (j) Refusal to permit city access to a cardroom for purposes of auditing or inspecting same. 4.4· Audit and Insnection Riqhts. The city shall have the right, at any time, without notice, to enter into any cardroom operating within the city and to conduct a reasonable inspection of all areas of such cardroom, and/or any or all fixtures, equipment, accounting materials or documents contained therein, in order to determine whether or not such cardroom is being operated in accordance with this Gaming Plan. 5. General Provisions. 5.1 Definitions. Except as otherwise expressly defined herein, capitalized terms, and terms otherwise requiring definitions for proper interpretation, shall have the meanings ascribed thereto by the Gaming Code. 5.2 Section Headinqs. Section headings contained herein are for reference purposes 15 / ¿¿ r 33 -. --..--- --.----- only and shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions of any section hereof. 5.3 Gamina Plan Amendments. This Gaming Plan may be revoked or amended, in whole or in part, at any time, after a public hearing, by approval of the city council. 5.4 Intearated Plan. All provisions of this Gaming Plan are intended to be integral parts of a comprehensive regulatory scheme. In the event that any material provision hereof is finally determined to be invalid, then, as of the date of such determination (a) the entire Gaming Plan shall, ab initio, become void and of no effect, and (b) the Gaming Code provisions otherwise implemented or superseded hereby shall become effective. 5.5 Aareement of Licensee to Accent Validity and Abide bv All Provisions. Each license which holds or is issued a license hereunder, in order to leg~lly operate a cardroom within the city must first enter into a written agreement with the city whereby such licensee agrees, on behalf of itself, any successors or assigns thereof, and any and all parties with a financial interest in the license or the cardroom operated thereunder, that such Persons (a) shall abide by any and all provisions of the Gaming Plan; (b) acknowledge that all provisions of the Gaming Plan are valid and enforceable by the city against such Persons; and (c) waive and agree not to pursue any and all claims or other action against the city that any or all provisions of the Gaming Plan were not legally adopted, valid or enforceable with respect thereto. ---. 16 /{)~3Y ----.-.--.---.------ ~u._..,_..._._·..___ -A---fiia t¡ M(! ~ t Þ 4/0 Oc.aftsld.~ eallfornla °4~~ December 30,1997 Richard P. Emerson Chief of Police City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: Transfer of license for Chula Vista Bay Club, Inc. (owned by Commerce Casino _ Request for approval of transfer to Haig Kelegian. Dear Chief Emerson: The pw:pose of this letter is to respectfully request the transfer of the above-noted licenses to Haig Kelegian; per an agreement dated December 5, 1997 between the Commerce Casino and Haig Kelegian. A copy of said agreement was forwarded to your office by Harvey Souza on December 8, 1997. I have recently submitted a preliminary application to Sgt. Tom Maloney of your department with copies of my current gaming licenses. I will, of course, comply with all requests from your office for any infonnation. As I told Sgt. Maloney, I am available at any time to answer any questions regarding this matter. Z4¡w~ . ./ / j) ,35 ~/1 ~fj 't- 19/? 121 Brooks Street . Oceanside, California 92054 . (760) 439-6988 Fax: (760) 439-5099 ~----- ---".._.._._._._~. 4ìT~AM(!>~£ INGLIS. LEDBETTER 6. GOWER -Ii . l.ð MtC~ 11I.. I"GUS ATTO~...IIt,.S .AT l.A.... ST~DI w.. I.C8E'T'T1:Jt 50'C: .OVTH C5RAJoJD ....yENUE ......"'h'fG ."OA'C~:¡: ~"""P"'';~ POST O,."a BOX ~2. ~AO Ci.. RITÇ""IC 18.... ,.....':)OR LOS _.,.~c.". C"'~.O_.... ,oo-r~.... OM::~ .... o;¡OC_ I..OS ........OI!:.L.I£S. <:::AU~O l:: ",, ..,A,. 900'7'1-e;el2: t.Zt31 eZ7"151!100 "'Q~" Co "0""," ....... (ZI3) 15~ë:e5? TI..O"I'.....t:.~ ..14..13 _. ....oa..C,""N .......~....IoI£8W~ D.:œmber 5, 1997 VIa Fax - (213) 726-0.456 Mr. Haig Kelegian 138 West Los Amígos MontebeUo, CA 90.640. Re: Chula Vista Our fÍ[e No. 1762 Deu Haig: Following your proposal to the Board of Directors oftae CaJifomia Commerce Club on December 2, 1997, the poinrs not=! below W<:rC agreed to in connection with the City of Chula Vist3 consolid¡¡te<! gammg lic.ense ovroed by ChuJa Vista Bay Club, Ltd. (tbe 'CVBC License"). Ifby December 3 I, 1997 you receive a written indication from the City ofChu1a Vista that they wiU allow for the consolidarion of the CVBC Li= with thæ catain Chula Vista gaming Iiccn:!C OYfT1ed by Harvey Souz;a (the "Souza License") into one Jiceme that will be able to operate no fewer than 24 gaming ubles in the City ofChula VISta, with all of the rights and pri~iJeg>:S avaiW>Je under the Souza Lìce~ which license will be the only authorized gaming license tor the City of ChuJa Vista; and ifby December 31. 1991 you reeeive written approval from the appropriate state agencies involved in the regulation of controlled gaming that tlle con.<olidation of licomses referred to above ¡,¡ allowed under all applicable S....te stalUtes, then, subject to such approval of 8lI required go\'emmental ageucies as m.y be necessary, Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. would e.ntcr imo a formal written contract with yoo and Mr. Walter Lack, and othen;, ¡fyou so desire, wherein you would acquire the CYBC License on the following terms and conditions: I. Purcha<e Price: S 1,000, COO. 2. Interest on Purcha.o;e Obli<r.!rion: None ~. Payment Date for Note: Three years from the date of acquisition. 4. Oblil!.or> Under Note: Haig Kclegian, individually, and Walter Lack, individually, on a join< and several ba.sis. Tfyou add other purchasers to thU transac-tion. then they /IJ - 3/0 --.-...- ._.w December 5, 1997 Page 2 would also eocecute the acquisition agreement and would be jointly and sevenùly liable thereunder. 5. F oral of EnIÍtv: The entity formed between Harvey Souu and yourself would be either.. limited liability C<1mpany. if same is allowed under California Jaw, and if same is nor allowed for the operation of me card club in Chula Vista, then a California limited paT1nership. 6. 1\.finimum Percent:",. of Ownershin: Your and Mr. uck'. ownership interests in the new entity formed ~een yourselves and Mr. Souz.~ ("the new Chula. Vista Card Club") would œ no less than 49% of =e. 7. M.n."ement Al1reement: The new Chula Vista Card Club would enter into a mu.nagement agre.m¡ent with ssid entity reasonably sel.e~'ted by you, regarding the da.y to dayaif:a.irs of the new Chula Vi5ta Card Club. The terms of this agreement would be reasonable and negotiateJ on an arms-length basis S. Onti,," tn Purcha~e: The Ca1ifurnia Co= Club, 01' its nominee, would have an ïrr""ocable option to acquire !tom you, Mr. Lack, and yom cu-owners, if any, such percent:1gC of your collective ownership interest in the new Chula Vi!'ta card club opo:nrtion such tn..t California Commerce Club would own no Jess than 15% afthe total entity. 9. Notice of EXercise of Oction' The option WeTTed to in paragraph 8 above is exercisable at any time by the Califortrill Commerce Club, or its nomiTlee, lendering 10 you written notice of its e>cercise of same, which natice may ~ tendered IIO earlier than the Ist ann;"ers:ory dote of yom' acquisition of the eVBC License and no later th<on Ihe 3rd anniversary of said purchase. 10. Ri"ñ¡ "fFi"'t Refusal: In addition to the option noted above, you, Mr. Lack, and your co-oaluers. if any. in the new Chula Vists. Card Club win grant 10 the California. Conlwerce Club, or it~ nomin~, a. right offif>( refu~ on commercially reascnwle h:rms to acquire your e.n1Ù'" interest in the neW Chula ViSta Card Club tlutt you wish to transfer to other than close family members. If:ill of the conditions noted ~bo\te are satisfucto!j' ro you, (will prepàre forma) written docum=ts regarding the subject transaction which. as you mow. must be approved in .,Jvance by alllc'1uired goverrunental agencies before they csn b=ome effec!Ìve. The Califomia Co=erce Club wishes you thc: b"", Qfluck in pursuing this tD.1rter. lò . 37 .----..-......-- ,-,.-..-----..---..--. --,.,-._---- December 5.1997 Page 3 If you ~ satisfied with the terms and conditions outline<! above, plea3e execute tbe copy of this lener thai ;.. enclosed and return same to me for my fiJe, together with the agreement that you have entered into ....ith Mr. $0""". Sincerely, ff/ijrJL Steven K. Ledbetter SKUcb cc: George TumOUljan Agreed to by ChuJa V...-t.. Bay Club. Ltd. Agreed to by Haig Kdegi.an this th~ day of December. 1997. - day of December. 1997. CHULA VISTA BAY CLUB, LTD. By: Chula VISta Bay Crob. Inc. ./ Its ~ Partner ' HAlG KELEGIAN By: , TOT..... p.e.> i /Cr:ir _ __~_"·'·_·'__M__.. ,._~_____ ____~_ _ ______ __ /!7/~J¡#/P¿ F #/Ô AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this I ~/ day of tJ.a.,,¡, (..- , 1997, by and between Harvey Souza, ("Souza') and Haig Kelegian ("Kelegian') (hereinafter collectively the "parties'). RECITALS: Whereas, Souza has been engaged for many years in the operation of a card club within the City of Chula Vista. Souza owns a consolidated card club license issued by the City of Chula Vista that allows him to operate a card club with up to 12 tables; Whereas, Kelegian intends to purchase the consolidated card club license owned by Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd., a California limited partnership, that would allow it to operate up to a 12 table card club within the City of Chula Vista; Whereas, the parties hereto feel that it is in their best interest to consolidate their card room operations within the City of Chula Vista, all in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement; Therefore, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Goal; Roles. Souza and Kelegian agree to work together to secure approval from all required governmental agencies for their combined ownership and operation of a card club within the City of Chula Vista. For the success of this project the following must þé' occur: a. Kelegian must demonstrate that he has acquired the consolidated license of Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. within one week of the execution of this agreement, subject only to the approval of the transfer by City and State regulators. The transfer may be contingent upon the parties obtaining the approvals stated in this agreement. Kelegian's agreement with Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. shall be presented to Souza for review immediately and may be disclosed to City and State regulators as the parties attempt to obtain the approvals described in this agreement. b. Kelegian warrants that there shall be no agreements between him and Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. or any other third party concerning this agreement or this project which are not disclosed to Souza. Souza warrants that there shall be no agreements between him and Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. or any other third party concerning this agreement or this project which are not disclosed to Kelegian. c. Souza and Kelegian must file an application with the City of Chula Vista within ten days of the execution of this agreement seeking approval of the following: i. Approval of the transfer of the Chula Vista Bay Club, Ltd. consolidated licc:nse to Kelegian. ii. Amendment of the gambling ordinance to permit consolidation of the previously consolidated licenses so that there will be only one authorized license for the operation of a card club within the City of Chula Vista, which license will be owned by the nc:w entity of the parties. iii. Amendment of the gambling ordinance ordinance to permit the new entity to operate a card club with at least twenty tables; to permit operation 24 hours per day, 365 days per year; and to permit play of all games legal within the State of California. iv. Amendment of the gambling ordinance to conform to the requirements of SB S. , 1 . /c) ·JI -,-,~".__._._..._-_.._-_._-----_.- __.._.".__~.___._.,. _. _.__n_n__ - -----+- v. Souza will be responsible for the process of obtaining the approval of the City of Chula Vista of the above. Kelegian will assist Souza if asked. d. Souza and Kelegian must file an application with the State of California within tifteen days of the execution of this agreement seeking approval of their combination as stated above and the operation of a card club as stated above. Kelegian will be responsible for obtaining the approval of the State of California of the above. Souza will assist Kelegian if asked. e. Souza must obtain the approval of Francis Burger and the Vegas Club to this project (consent may not be withheld unreasonably). The new entity must be willing to accept the encumbrance of the consolidated license to the loans of Burger and the Vegas Club. f. The parties must agree within 21 days of the date of this agreement on the details of the composition of the new entity, with all of the terms described herein, including the restrictions on transfer as described below. 2. Formation of New Entity. Provided that the parties secure the approvals stated in -\- h ¿ ('r"~¿' y paragraph, they agree that they will immediately form a California limited liability company, and after its formation forthwith contribute their Chula Vista card club licenses to the new limited liability company (the "Club") or if a new card club license is issued to the Club, surrender their current card club licenses upon the issuance of the new card club license. If for any reason a limited liability company is not allowed to own the subject card club licenses, the parties agree to form a California corporation (to qualify as a Subchapter S corporation) and contribute their licenses to it. Souza is to own a fifty-one percent interest in the entity and Kelegian is to own a forty-nine percent interest in the entity. The parties intend that Souza have a controlling interest by virtue of his majority ownership. 3. Composition of New Entity. Bob Moyer may own a portion of Kelegian's share of the new entity, provided that his interest is non-voting and provided the new entity, if it must be a subchapter corporation, will qualify as such if Moyer's shares are nonvoting. If this is not conselVatively feasible, Kelegian and Souza will be the sole shareholders. Either party may transfer shares to family members provided that the party retains voting control of the shares. Other transfers may be vetoed by the other party. Any transfer must be approved by the City of Chula Vista and the State of California and may not jeopardize the licensing of the club in any way. There shall be a shareholder agreement swing forth the above and providing for a method of purchasing the shares of a shareholder who wishes to withdraw or who dies or becomes disabled. 4. Additional Contributions. In addition to contributing his card club licenses to the Club. Kelegian agrees to assume the responsibility of acquiring, developing and outtining a new cardroom facility in the City of Chula Vista. Haig agrees to contribute up to One Million Dollars for this purpose. The contribution may be in cash, personal property, equipment, or guarantees of loans or leases. Souza shall not be required to make any additional contribution. 5. Operation of Existing Club. Until the Club opens for business, Souza may continue to operate his current card club business in substantially the same manner that it is currently operated, and Souza shall retain all profits therefrqm and be responsible for all costs and losses associated therewith. 2 /0 ~ C¡'¿::? --~_._.- -"-'--'-"--~" -~ ~-- -~~-~-- 6. Management. Souza will control the new entity. The new entity may hire International Casino Management, a California corporation totally owned by Kelegian and Walter Lack/to manage the Club on terms to be determined in a management contract. 7. Termination. Either party may terminate this agreement at any time until the approvals mentioned herein are obtained, at which time this agreement may not be unilaterally terminated. 8. General Provisions. a. Notices. Any notices required or permitted to be served by one party upon the other under the provisions hereof shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person, or mailed, by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the parties hereto, at their respective addresses set forth below, or such other addresses as shall be established for such purposes by the service of written notice in the manner herein provided. wü ì /.<><" 4""'5"'1' ;¡....~ . Kelegian's address: 1J"'j k.~ Ùs ,'A-'1 J I ~g' m""kiNI/P, clf 9P¡,~d ~;~... fl . lip>, Tn' - Souza's Address: Harvey Souza 429 Broadway Chula Vista, CA 91910 with a copy to: Michael Green, Esq. 227 Third Avenue ChuIa Vista, CA 91910-2763 b. Benefit of Al!reement. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective executors, administrators, successors and assigns. c. Applicable Law. This Agreement is to be governed by and construed under the laws of the United States and of the State of California. d. Captions and Paral!raph Headinl!s. Captions and paragraph headings used herein are for convenience only and not a part of this Agreement and will not be used in construing it. e. Invalid Provisions. Should any provision of this Agreement for any reason be declared invalid, void, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity and binding effect of any remaining portion will not be affected, and the remaining portions of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect as if this Agreement had been executed with said provisions eliminated. f. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. g. Entire Agreement. This,Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties. It supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in 3 . C// 10 ~ ..- -----.------------ _._~--_.. -"-.~ writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the parties' respective card club licenses in the City of Chula Vista. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representa- tions, inducements, promises, or agreements, oral or otherWise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement will be valid or binding. h. Modification. This Agreement may not be modified or amended by oral agreement, but only by an agreement in writing signed by the parties. I. Attornevs' Fees. In the event any party hereto shall commence an action to enforce or recover damages for the breach of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover, in addition to all the other relief which shall be granted, a reasonable attorneys' fee fIXed by the Court. J. Construction of A!!reement. Not as a mere recital and intending to be fully bound, Kelegian acknowledges that this Agreement was prepared by counsel for Souza and that Kelegian was advised that he was free to and did seek the advice of counsel representing his interest prior t~~~:~ same. Any ambiguity in the terms of this Agreement shall not be construed against x= but rather the terms hereof shall be construed as if both parties prepared this Agreement. k. Arbitration. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or to the breach of this agreement, shall be resolved by final and binding arbitration with the parties hereto selecting a single arbitrator to consider said matter within 15 business days following notice from one of the parties to the other party requesting the selection of an arbitrator. If within said 15 day period the parties are unable to agree upon an arbitrator, or if the arbitrator selected has not rendered his or her award on the matter within 45 business days of being selected, then the presiding judge of the San Diego County Superior Court, on the petition of either party, may select a single arbitrator to consider this matter. The arbitration is to be held in either the City of Chula Vista or the City of San Diego, State of California. Judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. In the event of any arbitration, all parties shall have equal rights under section 1283 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. The cost of the arbitrator shall be borne by the unsuccessful party in the arbitration or allocated between the parties as the arbitrator may determine if one of the parties does not totally prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. ./-' / ~ì Dated: /..1. -/ - , 1997 ~S~ r Harvev $erclZa Dated: ¡}.lc.[.~" /~ .1997 .{µ..v' 4 /O~f¡'2 ..__.__."._~__.__ ,u_..,.._..._..__." cc: John Goss Sid Morris Rick Emerson John Kaheny MICHAEL A. GREEN "À~Q0 &, /V1p¡J~ 6- ATTORNEY AT LAW 227 THIRD AVENUE #/6 CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910-2710 t619} 425-4020 FAX (6191 425·9709 Mr. Glen Googins Deputy City Attorney II .- - Office of the City Attorney 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Re: Harvey Souza application to consolidate Dear Mr. Googins: The purpose of this letter is to provide more detail as to the entity to be created to own the consolidated licenses, if approved by the City Council. The parties have agreed to the following: 1. Harvey Souza is to have management control of the entity which will own the licenses. He is also to own 51% of the entity. 2. While all persons shall have personal accountability to City and State regulators, the entity shall limit personal liability to the amount of the members' investments as to tort and contractual matters. This can be provided by corporations, limited liability companies, and limited partnerships. 3. The entity shall allow "pass through" treatment for profits and losses for tax purposes. This can be provided by Sub-S corporations, limited liability companies, and limited partnerships. 4. The entity will permit limited transferability (subject to the City and State regulation): a. Kelegian is obligated to allow the Commerce Club to purchase up to 25% of his 49% interest in the entity during a two year time frame beginning one year from consolidation. b. Kelegian is obligated to give the Commerce Club a first right of refusal to acquire his entire interest, if Kelegian wishes to make transfers other than to his family. c. Both Souza and Kelegian may wish to transfer limited amounts of their respective interests in order to raise capital for development purposes. The entity should be such that it will allow investor's interests to be nonvoting. /¿J --t/~ Glen Googins Deputy City Attorney City of Chula Vista January 5, 1998 Page two d. After the initial capitalization, and excepting permitted transfers to family, transfers would be subject to first rights of refusal 5. The entity will be capitalized by the contribution of each party's licenses to the entity. Further, Kelegian has agreed to contribute $1,000,000 in cash to the entity to be used for development of a new card club. However, the parties contributions shall be considered equal, considering Souza's history of development of a card club in Chula Vista. This contribution could be partly in the form of a loan, if better for tax purposes. Also, Souza's license is subject to a loan to Francis Burger. If the entity assumes both liabilities, this could equalize the parties contributions. The parties would prefer that the entity be a limited liability company. Unfortunately, the parties are still waiting to hear from the Attorney General's office as to whether this form of entity may hold a card club license. Limited liability companies are still new in California and not all regulatory agencies have caught up. If this is not permitted the form will be either a limited partnership or a Sub-s corporation. The disadvantage to these forms of entity is that they may necessitate the creation of further entities. For example, Harvey Souza would not wish to be general partner of a limited partnership because of exposure to personal liability, so he would create a corporation under his control to be the general partner. As soon as the Attorney General's office clarifies this point, the parties will decide on the form of entity and I will inform you. The parties are well aware of other limitations on transfer imposed by City and State regulations. They will endeavor at all times to comply with regulations and, beyond that, to inform authorities of prospective changes prior to formal application when possible. Please let me know if there is any further question regarding the above. Sincerely, ~a.~ MICHAEL A. GREEN MAG/wafw cc: Harvey Souza /d - VY ---- .. -,,-_.~--_._----- --------~------ Is the Oceans 11 cardroom in Oceanside the closest comparable cardroom in San Diego County to that proposed by Mr. Souza? Yes The case studies profiled on page 4 of the staff report seem to address card clubs of major size. For example, San Jose has _ tables; the Bicycle Club has 180 (?) tables, and the report lists "two major cardrooms" with law enforcement incidents. Are these incidents common to cardroom businesses of the scope of the Oceanside business and of the cardroom Mr. Souza and his father have run in Chula Vista for the past 50 years? These problems are unusual. Neither the Oceanside Club nor the ViI/age Club have experienced this type of problem. How does Oceanside law enforcement view the Oceans 11 operation? Oceanside is pleased with its operations. We hope to have an Oceanside Police Department representative present to respond to the Council's questions regarding Oceanside. Under the current ordinance, Chula Vista could have two 12-table operations in separate locations. Would a 24-table operation in one location involve more or less supervision than two 12-table operations in two locations? Probably less. Can the Chula Vista Police Department supervise a 24-table operation? Yes. The CVPD knows Mr. Souza, and can work closely with him in his new operation. Page 6 of the staff report indicates that the City can anticipate $240,000 in table tax, and ooditional monies based on gross revenues for a 24-table cardroom. Will these revenues be sufficient to cover law enforcement and other administrative costs? At 10 percent of gross, revenue should be 3 to 4 times what it is currently, more than enough to pay for these costs. In the past, the State's role in regulating card rooms has addressed ownership and monetary issues. Are the new State regulations that came into effect on January 1 just as stringent? The State has strong regulations regarding aI/ gaming issues. Chula Vista can count on support by the State in license issuance and monitoring. (!)-CjS I understand that the Oceanside cardroom is the closest comparable cardroom in San Diego County to the 24-table cardroom proposed by Mr. Souza. The case studies profiled on page 4 of the staff report refer to card clubs of major size. For example, the Bicycle Club has 180 tables, and the report lists "two major card rooms' with law enforcement incidents. Are these incidents common to smaller cardroom businesses? In the past, the State's role in regulating cardrooms has addressed ownership and monetary issues. Are the new State regulations that came into effect on January 1 just as stringent? Chula Vista's current ordinance permits two 12-table operations in separate locations. Would a 24-table operation in one location involve more or less supervision than two 12-table operations in two locations? Can the Chula Vista Police Department supervise a 24-table operation? /!J-I/~ ; I/O DATE: January 14, 1998 TO: Mayor and City Council members John M. Kaheny, City Attorney John Goss, City Manager Richard P. Emerson, Chief of Police VIA: Beverly A. Authelet, City Cler~ FROM: Carla J. Griffin, Acting Deputy City Clerk V SUBJECT: Gaming Plans At the January 13, 1998 City Council meeting, Paul J. Pfingst, District Attorney, County of San Diego, spoke regarding Chula Vista's and other cities' gaming plans. Documents were given to the City Clerk for distribution. Attached are copies of those documents. - - -_...__..__...._"._------_._--_.__..~-_..~ PAGE 35 24TH STORY of Level 1 printed in FULL format. Copyright 1996 The Chronicle Publishing Co. The San Francisco Chronicle OCTOBER 8, 1996 , TUESDAY, FINAL EDITION Correction Appended SECTION: NEWS; Pg. A1 LENGTH: 4899 words HEADLINE: Gambling Industry Aces Out Reforms SERIES: BILLION-DOLLAR JACKPOT BYLINE: April Lynch, Chronicle Staff Writer BODY: Part of an Occasional Series The gambling industry, once relegated to a few racetracks and small saloon card tables in California, is now one of the most influential players in state politics, shelling out at least $ 11. 5 million over the past five years to sway state lawmakers. A Chronicle analysis of state political spending data reveals an avalanche of gambling money aimed at Sacramento - - the kind of massive spending that, many observers say, has allowed gambling interests to buy political paralysis at public expense. With the death of the Gambling Control Act this year, state lawmakers have failed to pass stronger gambling regulations for the past four years in a row. Although California is the sixth-biggest gambling state, it lags far behind Nevada, New Jersey and other big gaming states when it comes to controls to rein in casino operatorš and stop crime. , 'Gambling has a very narrow set of interests and little organized opposition, and that is when political contributions really matter," said David Vogel, a business professor and campaign finance expert at the University of California at Berkeley. "The situation is tailor-made for a relatively corrupt level of policy-making." Gaming's large-scale cash infusion into the political system puts the industry at the level of other powerhouse special interests with deep pockets. From 1991 to 1994, for example, gambling interests spent about $ 1.1 million just on state legislative races. During that same time, the California Dental Association spent about $ 1 million on the Legislature, and the political action committee for the Association of Cê!lifornia Insurance Companies shelled out about $ 1.5 million. The Chronicle's analysis of state political contribution reports shows that when it comes to lawmakers In Sacramento, the gambling world has spared no expense over the past five years: PAGE 36 The San Prancisco Chronicle, OCTOBEE 8, 1996 * About $ 6.2 million has been spent on lobbyists to work the state Capitol. * The state Democratic Party and its candidates have been the gambling industry's clear favorites, pulling In $ 4 million to the Republicans' $ 1.3 million. * The state Democratic Party itself has raked in more than $ 660,000. Former Assembly Speaker Willie Brown, now mayor of San Francisco, received almost $ 450,000. The current head of the state Senate, President Pro Tem Bill Lockyer, has received almost $ 290,000. * Governor Pete Wilson took In $ 122,000 before he stopped accepting checks from gambling interests in 1994. The new Assembly speaker, Republican Curt Pringle, has pulled in at least $ 46,000 from the gambling world since he rose to power late last year, including $ 20,000 in the last week of June. Gambling interests and the politicians who take their money are quick to point out that there is nothing illegal about the giving and receiving of such campaign contributions. , , People contribute because they share a candidate's general philosophy, ' , said Lockyer. ' 'They don't contribute to influence a particular vote or decision. I / But everyone from gambling professionals in other states to government watchdogs says California needs its lawmakers to move beyond campaign money and make some tough decisions about gaming in the state. , 'Right now, gambling in California is wide open to massive evasion of the law,' , said Bill Eadington, who heads the Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming at the University of Nevada in Reno. I¡You'll always have an outlaw industry in the state until you can demonstrate that it can move beyond that. And to do that, you need competent regulation. ' * - - - - To follow the growth of gambling campaign contributions in Sacramento, one need look no further back than 1992, the first time lawmakers began to seriously talk about regulation. Gambling interests - - including big card clubs, racetracks, Indian casinos and Nevada groups - - heard the I 'R" word and started spending big. Now lawmakers do nothing with gambling regulation without the industry's input, even if that input means that regulation efforts die. t I Everyone in gambling would rather see gridlock than see one side get an advantage, ' , said Ruth Holton, director of California Common Cause. ' 'They fight it out, and the gambling bills go nowhere.' I Until 1992, total contributions and lobbying expenses by top g¿¡ming interests were below $ ] million a year. But then Attorney General Dan Lungren, a Republican, began to seriously talk about crime from gambling and the need for PAGE 37 The San Francisco Chronicle, OCTOBER 8, 1996 regulation. Gambling interests decided to turn to the Democrats. Most special interests try to win favor from both political parties equally, but this time the gambling world decided to choose sides. Brown, then the Assembly speaker and the state's top Democrat, had long been friendly to the industry, and many other Democrats followed his lead. The Democrats also controlled the Legislature, and could block Lungren's attempts at gambling control. By 1994, an election year, contributions from the gambling industry had soared to $ 4.2 million, with Indian tribes pouring millions of dollars into Democratic campaigns for governor and attorney general. The majority of the money! about $ 2.5 million, went to Democrats. Republicans got about $ 300,000. (Much of the remainder went to lobbyists.) The GOP slate won soundly. Now gambling interests had to contend not only with a hostile Lungren but also Wilson, who started returning their campaign checks. The gambling world continued to pour money into Democratic coffers so that Democrats who controlled the Legislature would stave off new regulatory laws. The spending paid off. Gambling regulation died in 1993, 1994, and 1995, blocked twice by Democratic heavyweights Brown and Lockyer. Last year, Lockyer killed the gambling regulation bill by letting it die in a Senate committee he chairs. On May 31, the day before the bill passed the Assembly 67 to 4 and headed for the Senate, Lockyer got a $ 25,000 donation from the state's biggest card club, the Commerce Club near Los Angeles. The next month, he got an additional $ 12,500 in gambling donations. The bill died in committee September 6. One month later, Lockyer got another $ 10,000 - - from the Commerce Club. Lockyer said such timing is purely coincidental. "Sometimes checks are pledged months before they arrive!' , he said. !IIlm not aware of any undue influence or inappropriate behavior." In late 1995, the picture changed when Democrats lost control of the Assembly. The gambling industry quickly wised up, throwing money at GOP lawmakers and committees to make up for years of giving Republicans the campaign contribution equivalent of spare change. For the first half of this year, Democratic candidates got about $ 170,000 and Republicans about $ 167,000, the first time In years that gambling contributions to the parties have been close to equal. And this year, just like every other one, the gambling regulation bill died. f'This bill has been held up and not allowed to pass because it served an even bigger cause as a juice bill (for legislators) , ' , Lungren said. ' I It has seemed to generate tremendous sums of money as long as it stays around. ' , PAGE 38 The San Francisco Chronicle, OCTOBER 8, 1996 * - - - - Among the biggest gambling powerhouses in the state are conglomerates with interests in horse racing and card clubs. In Southern California, Hollywood Park Inc. has built a glitzy high-rise cardroom next to its racetrack. Owner R.D. Hubbard has made himself a political force in the state, treating lawmakers to golf games and fancy meals. In the East Bay, British gambling giant Ladbroke Racing Corp. owns Golden Gate Fields and Casino San Pablo. The company represents the sort of corporate gambling interest now common in places such as Las Vegas and Atlantic City. But it has also had its problems with the law, and was banned from running casinos in England from 1979 to 1995. Both conglomerates are eager to expand in the state, and their political spending shows it. Hollywood Park has spent about $ 1.4 million on state lobbyists and contributions in the last five years. Ladbroke has thrown in about $ 752,000. Those figures don't include the millions spent by the two companies, and other gambling groups, on local elections to open cardrooms around the state. To many Californians, the size of the gambling industry here often comes as a surprise. The state does not allow Nevada-style games, but gambling is still a $ 14.5 billion-a-year business - - one of the biggest entertainment industries in the state. California has a small force to watch over all of this. It consists of three people in the attorney general's office, who license gambling operators and investigate possible crimes such as loan-sharking, money-laundering or gambling-related violence. The division is clearly outgunned and overwhelmed. "California's gambling industry is kind of retro, and not in a good way," said William Thompson, a professor of public administration who studies gambling at the University of Nevada in Las Vegas. , , It has slipped into what Nevada was like in the 1940s - - no oversight and sleazy operators. Every sleazy thing that can happen with gambling is happening in California.' , * - - - - There may be more hope for a gambling control bill next year - - not because the gaming industry has less to spend in the political arena, but because state politicians may have finally run out of excuses for the impasse. Lungren, the top GOP candidate for governor in 1998, still wants gambling control. Lockyer, eyelng a run for attorney general, knows that he can't campalsn well for the state's top law enforcement job as the legislator who let gambling run amok. And gambling interests seem to want the whole fight resolved. PAGE 39 The San Francisco Chronicle, OCTOBER 8, 1996 Many Indian tribes are willing to change their slot machines to comply with state law if it means wilson will finally negotiate gaming agreements with them. Racetracks and card clubs also seem to want to move ahead. , 'The gambling interests are tired of being milked for campaign contributions, 1 , said Assemblyman Phil Isenberg, D-Sacramento, who has parted ways with other Democrats in his longtime opposition to gambling. ' 'They want this over with, too. ' , But if gambling interests are tired of writing checks, it doesn't mean that many lawmakers will tire of getting them. Isenberg learned that firsthand this year, when he tried to get a law passed limiting legislators to $ 250 In contributions from each gambling company each election cycle. That bill was quickly killed by an Assembly committee. Over in the Senate, one of Lockyer's chief annoyances with this year's proposed gambling law was that he could not get a prohibition on gambling contributions to candidates for attorney general taken out of it. , 'When it comes to gambling, politicians are not saying 'What is in the public interest? I , , said UNLV's Thompson. ' 'They are saying 'Who lS sitting in my office today? ' That means you get unregulated gambling, and unregulated gambling is garbage. ' , DESPITE BIG PAYOUTS, INDIANS CAN'T BUY CLOUT California's Indian tribes, card-club owners and racetrack operators have one thing in common - - all have given huge amounts of money to state politicians. But the tribes have one major thing that sets them apart. Unlike other gambling interests, they haven't had much political clout to show for all the money they've spent. . Other gambling groups have worked to keep newly arrived Indian casinos from getting too big a share of the state's gambling market. Indian tribes have made some political investments that have proved to be losers. And backers of Indian gaming also say the resistance the tribes have met in Sacramento is only part of a long history of unequal treatment. , 'The tribes have the problem of opposition from racetracks and card clubs," said Fred Hiestand, a Sacramento lobbyist who represents several tribes. ' 'And historically, they've always gotten the short end of the totem pole.' , The state's tribes have plunked down about $ 2.8 million on contributions and lobbying in the last five years. Card clubs have spent about $ 4 million, and racetracks about $ 2 million. Those dollars have not added up to equal pull in Sacramento. The Legislature took up more than 30 bills backed by racing interests In the last SeSSlOTI. Card clubs are included in every major discussion about changes in gambling law. Meanwhile, Indian tribes have tried for years to get the state to negotiate with them over tribal casinos. Federal law allows tribes to offer .any kind of gambling legal in the state, and there are about 30 Indian casinos in California. PAGE 40 The San Francisco Chronicle, OCTOBER 8, 1996 The sticking point has been the 12,000 video slot machines that the Indian casinos run. The slots are a big moneymaker, but Governor Pete wilson and Attorney General Dan Lungren have long said they are illegal under state law. wilson won't negotiate state gaming agreements with tribes that have the slots. And the stakes for tribes that don't have state approval are high - - two large New Mexico tribal casinos were recently ordered closed. California tribes turned to the Legislature for help. Lawmakers debated two Indian slot bills this year. Both died in committee. Some observers say the cold shoulder that Indian caSlnos get in Sacramento lies In the tribes' relative lack of political experience. In 1994, for example, Indian interests contributed about $ 800,000 to Democratic attorney general candidate Tom Umberg. He lost. The tribes have given almost exclusively to Democratic candidates, in a state where the governor's office, attorney general's office and Assembly are currently controlled by Republicans. , 'The tribes are kind of new at this,' , said Ruth Holton, executive director of California Common Cause. ' 'And all the gambling interests are working at cross purposes, so it ends up being big money against other big money." Later this year, however, the tribes hope things will be looking up. Lungren and Wilson have agreed to negotiate a gambling agreement with the Pala Band of Mission Indians, who have a reservation near San Diego. Those negotiations will begin this fall. The tribe does not have a casino, but wants to open one. And it is willing to put aside slots in favor of a type of electronic gaming machine that would comply with state law. If the Pala tribe can negotiate a gambling compact with the state, the agreement could serve as a model for other tribes. "We're very heartened with the governor's decision to signal a new phase of dialogue with the state's tribes, , , said Dan Tucker, chair of the California-Nevada Indian Gaming Association. ' 'This is tremendous progress." * April Lynch ABOUT THE STORY The Chronicle's examination of political spending by gambling interests was based on state campaign contribution records and lobbying expenditure reports. State data covering nine years was examined, with a special focus on the past five years, when lawmakers began to debate gambling regulation. The state political spending data was gathered from online sources and paper records, and then examined using a computerized database manager program. The analysis did not include other gambling monies spent on national or local elections. Political spending was analyzed for the following gambling business owners or concerns: Artichoke Joe's Casino, Barona Band of Mission Indians, Bay 101 Casino, Bay Meadows Operating Company, Bell Gardens Bicycle Club, George and . __n -- ~..~ ---- ..-----,- -, -- - - ~ ~ PAGE 41 The San Francisco Chronicle, OCTOBER 8, 1996 Tom Bumb, Buena Vista Rancheria, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, Caesar's World, Inc" California Commerce Club, California Indian Nations PAC, Casino Morongo of Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. , Coyote Valley Tribal Council, Del Mar Thoroughbred Club, GTECH Corporation, Garden City Casino, George Hardie, Hoopa Valley Tribal Council, Hollywood Park Operating Company, R.D. Hubbard, Inland Casino Corp. , Ladbroke Racing Corporation/Pacific Racing Association, Los Angeles Turf Club, Norrnandie Club, Oak Tree Racing Association, Park Place Associates, Robinson Rancheria Citizens, Rumsey Rancheria, Dennis Sammut, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Santa Ynez Band of Chumas Indians, Sycuan Gaming Center of Sycuan Band of Mission Indians, Table Mountain Rancheria, Thoroughbred Breeders Association of California, Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians. ABOUT THE SERIES "Billion-Dollar Jackpot: Gambling in Cal i fornia' , is a Chronicle examination of legalized gambling, which has quietly become a major power in the Golden State. Today's installment of the occasional series shows how the $ 14 billion gaming industry has aimed huge amounts of money at Sacramento - - and in the process thwarted major gambling regulation in the state. WHY GAMBLING CONTROL CAN'T PASS GO The Gambling Control Act of 1996 (Senate Bill 1887) started out with celebratory fanfare in Sacramento earlier this year, but died an ugly death in the waning hours of the legislative session that ended September 1. Along the way, favors for gambling interests were tucked into the bill, often by politicians who have had their campaign war chests heavily stocked with gambling money over the past five years. Those goodies were stripped out of the proposed law at the last minute, but the Gambling Control Act still never made it out of the Legislature alive.: Contributions $ 122,200. California's Republican governor doesn't take money from the gambling world anymore, but he got a few big checks back when he did. Didn't want any gaming interest to get a sweet deal out of the gambling regulation bill. * Attorney General Dan Lungren: $ 13,450 The top Republican candidate for governor in 1998 has gotten a few checks from racetrack owners, but that's it. Has tried to get tougher laws to control gaming passed for four years In a row, only to be thwarted by the Legislature each time. * State Senate President Pro Tem Bill Lockyer: $ 288,000 A big friend of gaming interests, Lockyer has been Lungren's archrival when it comes to gambling regulation. When it comes to gambling controls, some call him I I the Roadblock. ' , * Assembly Speaker Curt Pringle: $ 60,071 The first Republican speaker in decades, Pringle has stayed out of some of the more public fights over gambling but has been active behind the scenes. He P1\GE 42 The San Francisco Chronicle, OCTOBER ¡¡, 1996 has'made' it clear that gaming interests better start giving to the GOP under his watch. * Assemblyman Bill Hoge: $ 111,000 A Republican from Pasadena, Hoge has pulled in a huge amount of money from the gambling industry during only four years in the Legislature. One of gambling's biggest advocates in the Legislature. * Assemblyman Phil Isenberg: $ 16,500 The city of Sacramento's longtime representative in the Assembly, Isenberg has bucked other Democrats for years by actively opposing gambling expansion. Like Lungren, not exactly a magnet for gambling contributions. * U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno (Not an elected official, no direct campaign contributions) As the federal honcho stuck with the bizarre duty of overseeing the Bell Gardens Bicycle Club, Reno would like nothing more than to get rid of it. Ladbroke has stepped forward as the most likely buyer, but there's a catch -- state law won't allow Ladbroke to operate the casino after purchasing it, a bad business deal. GAMBLING LOBBY Ladbroke Racing TOTAL SPENT ON LOBBYISTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS: $ 752,000 CorporationA British gambling conglomerate, Ladbroke owns the Golden Gate Fields racetrack in Albany, and has been trying to open a card club there for years. The company also owns the recently-opened Casino San Pablo in the East Bay. Ladbroke is smart and polished, but has had problems with the law in the past. GAMBLING LOBBY Commerce Club TOTAL SPENT ON LOBBYISTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS: $ 1.5 million A huge Southern California cardroom, the Commerce Club has long been an active force in Sacramento. One of its biggest gripes with the state these days is a recent court decision that prohibits ' 'backline betting, , , a very lucrative form of wagering where spectators simply watching card games bet on the game's outcome, GAMBLING LOBBY PAGE 43 'The San Prancisco Chronicle, OCTOBER 8, 1996 Hollywood Park Inc. TOTAL SPENT ON LOBBYISTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS, $ 1.4 million Located near the L.A. airport, Hollywood Park's racetrack and flashy highrise card club represent what the gambling industry hopes is the future of gaming in California. Chairman R.D. Hubbard has positioned himself as a major political player in the state. GAMBLING LOBBY California Indian tribes with casinos TOTAL SPENT ON LOBBYISTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS, $ 2.8 million The state's two dozen tribes that offer gambling on their reservations have had one focus for years - - to get an official OK from the state to run their 12,000 video slot machines. The governor and the attorney general want these gone. GAMBLING LOBBY The Bell Gardens Bicycle Club TOTAL SPENT ON LOBBYISTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS, $ 988,430 This Southern California card palace is the state's most notorious gambling club. The federal government took it over after finding out it had been bought with drug money, but the club has not exactly been clean under the fed's watch. The feds want to sell it, badly. Now see how they played the game, FOLLOW THE GAMBLING BILL START HERE: * CAN WE TALK? LOCKYER AND LUNGREN NEGOTIATE A GAMBLING BILL THEY BOTH LIKE PROCEED PACE 48 The San J?ranci:3co Chronicle, OCTOBER 8, 1996 (x) - Average gambling campaign conLribution to state lawmaker Source: Chronicle research GRAPHICS BY STEVE KEARSLEY, TEXT BY APRIL LYNCH/THE CHRONICLE CHART: (1) HOW MUCH EACH PARTY OR GROUP HAS GOTTEN FROM GAMBLING 1991 A fairly typical year, before all the talk of gambling control Lobbyist $543,309 Democrat $229,250 Republicans $123,900 1992 political parties get a bit more money, as talk of gambling control begins Lobbyist $508,441 Democrat $260,090 Republicans $175,266 1993 With gambling control efforts under way, many more lobbyists are hired to work the Capitol Lobbyist $1,003,596 Democrat $312,301 Republicans $292,225 1994 A big election year, with gambling pinning its hopes on the Democrats Lobbyist $1,404,505 Democrat $2,502,834 Republicans $307,221 1995 More tries at gambling control, more lobbyists, more cash to Democrats Lobbyist $1,847,666 Democrat $418,227 Republicans $243,514 1996 As of June, gambling interests had already contributed $1.2 million. Since 1996 is an election year, contributions from the industry are expected to be heavy again. The money this year is more evenly split between Democrats and Republicans Source: Chronicle research CHRONICLE GRAPHIC EC: BC: CHART: (2 ) GAMBLING GROUPS SHELL OUT BIG BUCKS In the last five years, competing gambling interests have poured millions of dollars into the state's political system. PAGE 49 The San Francisco Chronicle, OCTOBER 8, 1996 Some of the money has gone toward cutting off competition, some has been spent to push one group's agenda or stymie efforts at gambling regulation. But all the gambling interests have learned that to play the game, they have to spend big. Card clubs $3.7 million Indian tribes with casinos $2.8 million Card club/horse-racing conglomerates $2.2 million Horse racing $2 million Gaming machine maker $890,000 Source: Chronicle research CHRONICLE GRAPHIC EC: BC: CHART: (3) THE MAJOR GAMBLING PLAYERS Here are the 10 largest gambling donors to state lawmakers over the past five years. Commerce Club $1.5 million Hollywood Park $1. 4 million Bell Gardens Bicycle Club $988,430 GTECH (gaming machines) $893,742 L.A. Turf Club $756,793 Del Mar Thoroughbred Club $581,920 Calif. Indian Nations PAC $552,833 Circus Circus $522,974 Oak Tree Racing $521,942 Ladbroke Racing $472,000 Source: Chronicle research CHRONICLE GRAPHIC EC: BC: CHART: (4) TOP 10 RECIPIENTS political war chests with the biggest gambling contributions in the last five years: Tom Umberg, ex-attorney general candidate, now chair of Clinton's California re-election effort $810,000 State Democratic Party committees $663,804 Willie Brown, former Assembly speaker, now mayor of San Francisco $448,534 Bill Lockyer, state Senate president pro tem (D-Hayward) $289,000 John Garamendi, former gubernatorial candidate, now deputy interior secretary $241,000 Ken Maddy $198,300 Curtis Tucker $164,210 Pete Wilson $122,200 Republican Party $117,040 Bill Hoge $110,981 Source: Chronicle research CHRONICLE GRAPHIC EC: BC: PAGE 50 The San Francisco Chronicle, OCTOBER 8, 1996 CHART (5) : WHERE 'GAMBLING INDUSTRY MONEY GOES A look at gambling spending on state politics shows what happened when some state leaders started trying to get tougher gambling controls. The talk began in 1992, and by election year 1994, gambling spending topped $4 million. More big spending is expected in 1996, another election year. 1987 $436,675 1992 Gambling talks start $950,897 1994 $4.2 million NOTE: Spending for 1996 as of 6/29 is $1.2 million Source: Chronicle research CHRONICLE GRAPHIC EC: In The Chronicle's October 8 story on how the gambling industry has sidetracked regulation, an explanation in a chart about the 10 largest gambling donors was incomplete: The money totals in included both contributions to state lawmakers and payments to lobbyists. CORRECTION-DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1996 , THURSDAY, FINAL EDITION CORRECTION: GRAPHIC: PHOTO, CHART ,At the Rumsey Cache Creek Rancheria Casino in Yolo County, gamblers arriving by bus from the Bay Area get chips and cash as an incentive to play the games , BY RUSSELL YIP, THE CHRONICLE LANGUAGE: ENGLISH LOAD-DATE: October 8, 1996 November 18, 1996 The City of San Diego MANAGER'S REPORT DATE ISSUED: August 6, 1992 REPORT NO. 92-263 ATTENTION: City Council Meeting, Agenda of August 10, 1992 SUBJECT: proposal to consolidate existing cardrooms and establish a large casino style card club/entertainment complex REFERENCE: Municipal Code Chapter III, Article 3, Division 39 SUMMARY: Issue: Should the City allow the consolidation of existing cardrooms and the establishment of a single, large card club, by amending the current cardroom ordinances? Manaqer's Recommendation: Do not permit the consolidation of existing cardrooms and the establishment of a large card club. Do not amend the existing cardroom ordinances. Other Recommendations: None. Fiscal Impact: ( 1 ) The Commerce club will pay the City a $2 million "license fee" for the exclusive right to develop and operate the proposed card club casino. (2 ) The proposed new card club would also provide the City with new revenues of approximately $10 million per year. The proponents of this facility also estimate that 1500 new jobs would be created. BACKGROUND: On June 17, 1992, Robert MOYER, president of the San Diego Card Club Association, and Ron MIX, Attorney for the Card Club Association, submitted a proposal to the Public Services and Safety Committee on behalf of the Commerce Casino, to consolidate the existing cardroom licenses and establish a single, 100 table card club/entertainment center. The Committee referred the matter to the City Manager for evaluation and response. City Manager's Report ~ Page 2 During a 1978 City Council hearing, a federally protected witness articulated hidden ownership and organized crime involvement in local cardrooms. Based on this hearing and other investigative findings, the current cardroom ordinance was adopted in 1983. The ordinance clearly states its goal of phasing out cardrooms because they attract a criminal element, promote compulsive gambling, and aggravate existing police problems. Since the adoption of the existing ordinance, the City Council, City Manager, and the Police Department have adhered to a policy of strict cardroom regulation and enforcement. During the late 1970s, there were in excess of 100 cardrooms; today, there are 12. DISCUSSION: Commerce Casino and Bicvcle Club Overview The Commerce Casino, in the City of Commerce and the Bicycle Club Casino, in Bell Gardens are the two ( 2 ) largest casinos in the State. Members of the Police Department visited the Los Angeles area, to investigate the operation of these two ( 2 ) casinos. The investigation resulted in the interviews of individuals representing law enforcement officers, casino personnel, a Commerce City Official and persons from the private sector. The Commerce Club and Bicycle Club both have had their share of controversy. Commerce City Officials were indicted and convicted in 1984 for accepting bribes from the card club financier in order to obtain the license to operate the club. Federal authorities seized the Bicycle Club in April 1990, after a jury found that $12 million of the $22 million used in its construction came from Florida drug smugglers. The club's profits were frozen and placed in a special Marshal's account. The club seized under the provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act is the single most valuable asset ever confiscated by the U.S. Government. Since these incidents, the operation of these large card club casinos appears, at least on the surface, to be well run. Based on law enforcement interviews, the internal security operation is geared to prevent obvious problems such as cheating, prostitution, selling stolen property, and to a certain extent, bookmaking and narcotics dealing. Addi tionally, law enforcement and casino personnel indicated that loansharking, bookmaking and narcotic - ---..--------------------..--- city Manager's Report Page 3 dealing do exist, but these crimes are aggressively investigated when it comes to their attention. Backqround Investiqation The San Diego Police Department conducted a background investigation on the forty-two (42) current pointholders involved with the Commerce Card Club, Commerce, California, and the current owners of the San Diego cardrooms, who will eventually become pointholders in the proposed San Diego version of the Commerce Card Club. The results of the Police Department's background checks revealed no significant criminal history on any of the currently listed Commerce Card club pointholders. Howeve r , the inquiry revealed questionable business practices by several card club owners. One pointholder was appointed to the California Athletic Commission in 1978, reappointed in 1981, and again in 1983 by former governor George DEUKMEJIAN. During this time, it was determined that the appointed individual was a member of the North American Boxing Federation and a member of the world Boxing Council Executive Committee. This individual was also an insurance executive attempting to increase insurance requirements in the boxing industry. Several state senators believed this was a conflict of interest and subpoenaed the pointholder to appear before the Senate in 1983. The pointholder refused to appear requiring the Governor to find a replacement. Another shareholder, currently holding a high level management position with the Commerce Card Club, operated H & C Disposal in the city of Hawthorne. In 1985, the Los Angeles County Grand Jury criticized Hawthorne City for contracting with H & C Disposal since 1957, without competitive bidding. During this time, Hawthorne residents were paying approximately 21% more for trash services than residents of neighboring cities. Another individual owner currently owns the Hi-Desert Casino in Adelanto, California. Her husband, who is now deceased, was a sports Book Operator in Las Vegas in 1981. This same individual made political contributions to a mayoral candidate of the city of Compton, while he had city contracts to haul residential and commercial refuse. This same person, while operating the Hi-Desert Casino in 1992, was involved in a controversy with the Police Chief of Adelanto. The Police Chief was charged with thirty-six (36) counts of theft, - -_._._~_.... City Manager's Report Page 4 embezzlement and perjury, after he cashed hundreds of dollars of checks made out to a police canine unit and later asked the donor, Hi-Desert Casino, to destroy the records. The casino manager testified he endorsed a series of $700 in checks made payable to Friends of Adelanto Canine and gave the cash to the Police Chief. A background inquiry was also conducted on the existing San Diego cardroom owners. One owner was found to have been charged with bookmaking in 1975. However, he was acquitted on that charge. In September of 1985, he was again charged with four (4) different gambling violations, including bookmaking and one (1) count of criminal conspiracy. The individual pled guilty to a gambling violation as an infraction. The remaining charges were dismissed. Orqanized Crime Involvement in California Casino Type Gamb1inq The Commerce Card Club fi rst opened its doors in 1983. It drew both public attention and criticism. The City Council of Commerce initially awarded the cardroom license in 1982 to a group from Las Vegas, Nevada. At the time, other investor groups protested the "secretive" manner in which the license was awarded. One of the initial licenses was awarded to a Las Vegas resident, who hired a number of persons with ties to Frank BALISTRIERI, who is allegedly associated with Organized Crime in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The initial financial backer of the card club was wallace Pat MORIARTY. The Pat MORIARTY group was subsequently indicted and convicted for bribery of Commerce city officials so they would award the exclusive license to operate the Commerce Card Club. The city officials were charged with corruption charges and convicted. In the early 1980s, George HARDIE and a group of investors sought to open "the largest card club ever." He settled on Bell Gardens, California, and after raising $22 million in construction funds to open the club, he found out he needed an additional $12 million. This $12 million allegedly came from Florida drug dealers. Al though Mr. HARDIE was absolved of any wrong doing, Federal Prosecutors seized 20% of the club and are seeking 16% more. The Federal Government currently owns a portion of the Bicycle Club. The Asian games at the Bicycle Club are controlled by Hollmad CHEUNG, who came from Hong Kong. Mr. CHEUNG is currently the subject of a criminal investigation and is reported to be the leader of a loan shark extortion operation conducted out of the Bicycle Club. One heavy gambler, who was interviewed by investigators, claimed to have had $900,000 extorted from her during the last three years. This investigation lead to an extortion conviction in Pomona, California. --- -~--_._- City Manager's Report Page 5 Affidavits link CHEUNG as an associate of the "Wo HOp To," a major Hong Kong based Chinese crime group, active in the United States. A second example of organized crime in the gambling business involves San Diegan Allen GLICK. Mr. GLICK was the owner of Hacienda and Marina Hotels in Las Vegas. He had an opportunity to buy the Stardust and Fremont Hotels. He needed $63 million to buy the casinos. It was suggested to GLICK that the Teamsters' Pension Fund could make the loan necessary to make the purchase and that Frank BALISTRIERI, alleged head of the Milwaukee Crime Family, could influence the Teamsters to obtain the loan. BALISTRIERI eventually obtained the money and GLICK took over the two hotels. Organized Crime influence took over as BALISTRIERI ordered GLICK to promote one of his floor bosses to take over gambling and promotions to report back to the Milwaukee Crime Family. GLICK tried to control this appointed individual, but was told by this individual that he reported to the Milwaukee Family. It soon became apparent to GLICK that the organized crime network was taking over the gambling interest. An investigation revealed the scales used to weigh the coins had been rigged. He estimated his loss at about $7 million. This apparently was skim money routed to the organized crime family. GLICK later testified against these organized crime figures and his testimony led to the incarceration of many of the crime family leaders. A third example of organized crime in casino gambling involves the Barona Indian Casino. The Barona Casino was the first to open in San Diego County. In 1984, an organized crime associate, Stuart SIEGEL, from Las Vegas, Nevada, became the General Manager of the casino. Within eleven (11) months, SIEGEL skimmed $110,000 from the casino operation. He was indicted and convicted for conspiracy and grand theft. SIEGEL used decoy players, who were his associates from Las vegas and New Jersey, to win large "fixed" prize games. These games ranged from $16,000 to $28,000. In the late 1980s, federal and local law enforcement began an investigation into the takeover of the Rincon Indian Gambling casino by the Chicago Organized Crime Family. The Chicago Organized Crime Family was allegedly directing local organized crime figure Chris PETTI to gain control of the Rincon Casino using a front man. The purpose of this takeover was to establish a western base of operation for Chicago organized crime, to skim money from the casino, launder illegal monies and promote City Manager's Report Page 6 acts of prostitution, loansharking and extortion. This has apparently been verified by tape recorded conversations between Chris PETTI and organized crime figures. The Chicago organized crime leadeJ:s, Chris PETTI and several others, have been indicted and are awaiting trial. It took an inordinate amount of personnel hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars to prevent Chicago organized crime from establishing in San Diego. Another example of organized crime ties to local gaming casinos involves the Viejas Casino in Alpine, California. The casino opened in September of 1991. Since then, information has been received that the Detroit Organized Crime Family has invested a large amount of money into this casino. Cardrooms and Criminal Activity Police investigations of cardrooms, throughout the years, have revealed them to be magnets for criminal activities, such as bookmaking, loansharking, narcotics sales and use, and trafficking in stolen property. Between June 27, 1991, and October 30, 1991, the Police Department conducted an undercover investigation into unlawful activities occurring in or about cardrooms. Illegal activities observed by the officer included: Narcotics provided to or sold to the officer on several different occasions by cardroom employees and patrons. Narcotics use on cardroom premises by both employees and patrons. The placing of wagers on horse races and sporting events with cardroom employees and patrons. Convicted and known bookmakers and individuals suspected of ties to organized crime frequenting cardrooms on a regular basis. Personal observation of cardroom employees and patrons under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol, while on the cardroom premises. Based on the above unlawful activities, eleven (11) persons, including cardroom employees, were charged .by the District Attorney's Office with eighteen (18) narcotics and bookmaking violations. Ten (10) of the eleven (11) cases were adjudicated City Manager's Report Page 7 with guilty pleas and a conviction. One ( 1 ) suspect remains at large. These investigative findings mirror conclusions uncovered during earlier police investigations and probes completed in other cities. During January 1991, the San Jose Police Department, in connection with State and Federal Law Enforcement agencies, completed a nine (9 ) month undercover investigation involving organized bookmaking operations. This inquiry originated in two (2) San Jose cardrooms, leading to the identification of thirty (30 ) bookmaking sites throughout the State, generating more than $1 million a week in illegitimate business. The most recent San Diego undercover operation and o the r police investigations throughout the State strongly support the Police Department's factual statement, that card rooms attract and promote criminal behavior. The card room proposal does not contain new evidence or information to the contrary. Asian Games As the number of large casino type cardrooms has increased, so has the popularity of Asian games and monies generated from these games. One-third of the games played at the Commerce Casino are Asian. According to law enforcement and City of Commerce officials, 60% to 65% of the casino's revenue is derived from these games. Asian games at the Bicycle Club Casino account for approximately 50% of their revenue. A major concern that currently plagues law enforcement is "follow- homett robberies. The victims are usually Asian gaming winners. The suspects are Asian gang members. According to Los Angeles County law enforcement, approximately twenty (20) "follow-home" robberies occurred last year involving card players being followed anywhere from Oxnard, California to San Diego. Members of the Alhambra Police Department indicated that on the average, two (2 ) or three ( 3 ) residential robberies occur weekly in their city and a majority of them are attributed to the Commerce Casino. Investigators from the Alhambra Police Department also estimate that only 30% to 40% of these residential robberies are reported. Robbery victims are reluctant to report and/or identify the suspects involved because of intimidation and distrust of law enforcement among the Asian community. Another major concern is the noticeable increase in Asian Organized Crime activity. The most developed Asian criminal group on the west coast is the Wah Ching (literally, Youth of China). It is an City Manager's Report Page 8 international criminal cartel with ties to the leaders of two (2) Hong Kong based triads and one Canadian based triad. From its origins in 1968 as a street gang, Wah Ching leaders now control a vast array of legal and illegal businesses, including night clubs, entertainment holdings, jewelry stores, travel agencies, medical services, gas stations, and gambling clubs. It is estimated Wah Ching has a hard core membership of approximately 200. Not surprisingly, disputes over control between rival groups can become violent. In 1983, a gambling dispute between two (2) rival Seattle Chinese Organized Crime groups resulted in the "Wai Mei" massacre; thirteen (13) persons were tied up and executed. On June 18, 1992, Robert W. KOPPE, Jr., Assistant Director, Office of Strategic Analysis, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, U.S. Department of the Treasury, testified before the Permanent Subcommi ttee on Investigations (Uni ted States Senate) regarding Asian Organized Crime. His testimony describes a disturbing trend of Asian organized gangs increasing their influence and involvement in gambling and money laundering. (Attachment 1) The game of pai Gow was introduced into California cardrooms in the mid-1980's, primarily in large casino type clubs. pai Gow is a Chinese dominoes style game. It is played with black tiles and/or with playing cards (simplified version). The majority of pai Gow operations are contracted out by casinos to a person(s) of Chinese descent. In 1985, the pai Gow manager for the Huntington Park cardroom was murdered. His body was discovered in the trunk of a car parked at the Los Angeles Airport. During September 1987, a former pai Gow dealer for the Commerce Club was also the victim of a homicide. Allowing the establishment of a casino type card club offering Asian games, could provide Asian Organized Crime with an opportunity to establish their criminal presence in San Diego. Asian Gamblinq, A New Wave of Compulsive Gamblinq Based on a 1991 investigative report by a Los Angeles Times reporter, Asian games are beginning to show society the problems of compulsive gambling. Asian games have dramatically and swiftly reversed the fortunes of California casinos. Businesses have doubled and in some cases tripled at some of these card clubs. According to a law enforcement source, many card clubs would fold without Asian games. Additionally, the investigative report indicated that many participants in Asian games will gamble upwards of eighteen (18) consecutive hours, then go to their vehicle in the parking lot, City Manager's Report Page 9 sleep for two hours, only to come back and gamble again. Many have lost their businesses, their houses and their marriages, because of their gambling. Many of these Asian game participants are indebted to loan sharks who charge exorbitant interest rates for their loans. (Attachment 2) Social Issues Involvinq Gamblinq Traditionally, law enforcement has resisted the expansion of legalized gambling locations, based on crime associated with these types of operations. However, law enforcement, mental health, and public policy professionals have all overlooked one of the most critical areas of concern, which is compulsive gambling and its impact on society. Gambling experts estimate there are eight (8) million compulsive gamblers in the united States. During the evaluation of ,this proposal, three (3) nationally recognized experts in the field of compulsive gambling and the impact on society were interviewed. The consensus among these experts is that pathological gambling is a psychological, social, and economic problem of great magnitude which must be addressed. (Attachment 3) Fiscal Concerns Historically, the concept of establishing a casino style card club has focused on city governments struggling with budget constraints and the lack of new tax revenues. Proposals have painted a picture of immediate and significant relief to shrinking city budgets, based on the opportunity to acquire millions of dollars in new revenues. These casino cardroom proposals on the surface are difficult to dismiss, in light of the fact there are no initial financial outlays for the city and as mentioned, additional revenues in some cases are substantial. However, anticipated costs to the city for increased law enforcement services, social services programs, and lower property values relating to the operation of a large card club, could well exceed the expected annual card club tax revenues. For example, Atlantic City casinos have created more than 41,000 new jobs, since establishment of casinos - more than the City's population, but welfare rolls have significantly increased. Additionally, the number of overnight guests at the City's Rescue Mission has swollen from an average of 25 in 1976 to 220 during 1989. The current cost to regulate and police the existing card rooms is City Manager's Report Page 10 approximately $18,000 per year, based on weekly inspections to monitor cardroom activities and curtail criminal behavior. A large cardroom opened 24 hours a day and drawing thousands of persons, high stakes games, criminal elements, etc. , would substantially increase policing costs. Major crimes/investigations and organized crime would require the continuous attention of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies increasing enforcement costs to several hundred thousand dollars per year. Proponents of this casino estimated that 1500 new jobs would be created. Although the economy is declining during these uncertain times and there is a desperate need for city governments to generate new revenues and jobs, gambling monies are no substitute for productive economic growth. Cardroom Attrition Based on factual informätion that cardrooms create an environment conducive to criminal activity, various cities throughout the State have moved to eliminate, phase out, or not allow cardrooms to operate. Comparable areas such as the City of Los Angeles and San Francisco do not permit cardroom operations. The City of San Jose has three (3 ) card rooms and additional cardrooms are prohibited. If a cardroom permit is surrendered, revoked, or terminated by law, the number of card rooms in San Jose is reduced to that extent. The cities of La Mesa and El Cajon closed their cardrooms approximately 20 years ago. Requlation of Cardrooms San Diego cardrooms are designated as police-regulated businesses under the existing ordinance. This regulation authorizes the Police Department to make regular inspections to insure compliance with applicable laws and to curtail criminal acti vi ties. The proposed ordinance does not classify the new cardroom as a police- regulated business. (Attachment 4) The Police Department could be prohibited from entering the cardroom and moni toring its operations, absent an emergency call or during the course of an active investigation. The inability to conduct regular inspections would compound crime problems in and about the cardroom. Private security would be unable to address these crime concerns due to the lack of expertise, training, and ties to cardroom management. The State of California does not have a gaming commission. Card clubs are licensed through a regulatory board of the State Department of Justice, but this process involves only a cursory review of criminal records of the clubs' owners and employees. The City Manager's Report Page 11 lack of regulation has allowed these clubs to exist while maintaining little accountability. Consequently, the clubs employ gang members and serve as a central meeting place for persons associated with gangs. Additionally, the lack of adequate record keeping or accountability for cash flow in these clubs provides obvious opportunities for money laundering. Summary The San Diego area offers a wide variety of gambling entertainment. The Del Mar Racetrack provides on-site and satellite wagering on horse races, Barona, Sycuan, Viejas, and the existing San Diego cardrooms offer an assortment of card games and bingo. Sports betting, dog, and horse racing are available in Tijuana. Avid gamblers are just a short driving or flying distance to Las Vegas, without San Diego dealing with criminal and social problems associated with gambling. Ten potential locations for the proposed cardroom (Mission Valley and the Mira Mesa areas) have been identified. The cardroom is to be opened 24 hours a day, seven days a week, drawing large numbers of people, traffic, noise, and persons potentially involved in criminal activities. The possibility of substantial new revenues is attractive at a time of shrinking City funds. However, the likelihood that this facility could become a magnet for organized crime outweighs the financial benefits. The establishment of the casino cardroom would be inconsistent with previously stated Council goals regarding cardrooms, impede law enforcement efforts to reduce criminal acts attributed to cardrooms, provide organized crime with the incentive to initiate illegal operations in San Diego, and cause the exploi ta tion of compulsive gambling. Respectfully submitted, fk< Jack McGrory, Bob Burgreen/DB city Manager's Report Page 12 Attachments: ( 1 ) Testimony before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs by Robert w. KOPPE, Jr. I Assistant Director, Office of Strategic Analysis, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, U.S. Department of the Treasury, dated June 18, 1992. ( 2) Los Angeles Times investigative article dated July 28,1991. (3 ) Interviews of recognized experts; Richard J. ROSENTHALL, M.D., Rachael A. VOLBERG, ph.D. , and Durand F. JACOBS, ph.D. , regarding compulsive gambling and the impact on society. (4 ) Memorandum by City Attorney dated July 27, 1992. PAGE 59 1ST STORY of Level 1 printed in FULL format. Copyright 1998 City News Service of Los Angeles, Inc. City News Service January 7, 1998, Wednesday LENGTH: 281 words HEADLINE: Casino Complaint DATELINE: BELL GARDENS BODY: The state's Fair Political Practices Commission has filed a 922-count complaint against a Bell Gardens casino partially owned by the federal government. The FPPC complaint accuses the Bicycle Club of concealing its role in several election campaigns aimed at blocking potential competitors, the Los Angeles Times reported. The case contains the most counts ever filed against an organization in the 23-year history of the state's political reform law. If the casino and its staff of political consultants are found liable on all counts! the FPPC could impose a record $1.84-million fine, officials said. The state action is an embarrassment to the U.S. Justice Department, which owns 36 percent of the casino and has overseen its operations since 1990 when the club was seized during the course of a money-laundering case. The complaint arose after a series of elections in 1995, when more than a dozen California cities were scrambling to hold balloting to decide whether to allow card clubs before a moratorium on new clubs took effect Jan. 1, 1996 . State investigators said the Bicycle Club spent more than $1 million to oppose casino plans in those cities and that it organized and financed campaign committees that sent political mailers. The mailers warned voters that a card club would attract loan sharks and would addict residents to gambling, investigators said. While the complaint is pending, the FPPC is scheduled to consider on Jan. 15 a $414,000 default judgment against the casino's eight political committees. Former casino manager George G. Hardie and four others are named in the accusation. LANGUAGE: ENGLISH LOAD-DATE: January 8, 1998 PAGE 60 2ND STORY of Levell printed in FULL format. Copyright 1998 Times Mirror Company Los Angeles Times January 7, 1998, Wednesday, Home Edition SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Metro Desk LENGTH: 693 words HEADLINE: U.S.-RUN CASINO FACES STATE CHARGES; REGULATORS: FPPC FILES LARGEST- EVER CASE AGAINST BICYCLE CLUB, SAYING IT CONCEALED ROLE IN SEVERAL ELECTIONS. BYLINE: JEFF LEEDS, TIMES STAFF WRITER BODY: The state Fair political Practices Commission has filed a 922-count complaint against a Bell Gardens casino partially owned by the federal government, accusing the card club of concealing its role in several election campaigns aimed at blocking potential competitors. If the Bicycle Club and its staff of political consultants are found liable on all counts, the FPPC could impose a record $ 1.84-million fine, officials said. The complaint contains the most counts ever filed against an organization in the 23-year history of California's political reform law. The state action is an embarrassment to the U.S. Justice Department, which owns 36% of the casino and has overseen its operations since 1990 when the club was seized during the course of a money-laundering case. The FPPC complaint arose after a series of elections in 1995, when more than a dozen California cities were scrambling to hold balloting to decide whether to allow card clubs before a moratorium on new clubs took effect Jan. 1, 1996 . State investigators said the Bicycle Club spent more than $ 1 million to oppose casino plans in those cities. The Bicycle Club organized and financed campaign committees that sent political mailers warning voters that a card club would attract loan sharks and would addict residents to gambling, investigators said. Although the casino's involvement in political campaigns is legal, FPPC investigators found that campaign committees financed by the Bicycle Club failed to disclose that relationship. Among the targets of the accusation is the casino's top political consultant, Jerry Westlund, who was indicted last month for allegedly embezzling $ 380,000 of campaign funds. Of eight cities that considered new casinos on their 1995 ballots, only one voted to allow them. Similar ballot measures have failed in seven other cities since 1993 in campaigns where the Bicycle Club financed the opposition, investigators said. "The scheme was simple and consistent," FPPC general counsel Steven Churchwell said in the complaint. The casino first created "shell committees II PAGE 61 Los Angeles Times, January 7, 1998 to hide its identity, then pumped money into the committee, allowing one to siphon the money to others. When voters received mailers from such organizations as Concerned Taxpayers of California, with no mention of the Bicycle Club, they could not know the true source of the opposition, he said. Harry Richard, a former Las Vegas casino executive who ran the casino for the u.s. Marshals Service during the Bicycle Club's heaviest involvement in political campaigns, has not been charged in the FPPC complaint, nor has any federal employee. The Marshals Service has said that its asset managers told Richard to stop making political contributions in late 1995, but that he disregarded their instructions. While the complaint is pending, the FPPC is scheduled to consider on Jan. 15 a $ 414,000 default judgment against the casino's eight political committees. Former casino manager George G. Hardie and four others are named in the accusation. Hardie, who founded the Bicycle Club in 1984 and served as its manager before he was ousted in 1994, contends that the FPPC is seeking to blame him because it doesn't want to pursue the federal government. "They trumpet the record fine, then they don't go after the people who were actually overseeing these activities, 11 said Hardie's attorney, Frederic D. Woocher. He also said that the FPPC had II overcharged II the targets of the investigation, and noted that many of the counts are not for direct violations, but aiding and abetting. The case, which will be argued before the commission¡ involves twice as many counts as the FPPC's second-largest complaint, taken against an anti-gun control organization that unsuccessfully worked to recall former state Sen. David Roberti in 1994. The agency imposed a $ 808,000 fine in that case. "The question is, as a technical matter, should they have been reported as sponsored committees?" Woocher said. "That's something George left to the others. They've got these sort of bizarre, technical violations. Let's see what the fine is at the end of the case. " LANGUAGE: English LOAD-DATE: January 7, 1998 PAGE 62 20TH STORY of Level 1 printed in FULL format. Copyright 1997 Times Mirror Company Los Angeles Times November 29, 1997, Saturday, Home Edition SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Metro Desk LENGTH: 1825 words HEADLINE: CASINO POLITICAL MISDEEDS ALLEGED; INQUIRY: STATE WATCHDOG SAYS U.S.- CONTROLLED BICYCLE CLUB SPENT $1 MILLION IN TRYING TO DEFEAT PROPOSED GAMBLING CENTERS--AND FAILED TO PROPERLY ACCOUNT FOR DONATIONS. BYLINE: JEFF LEEDS, TIMES STAFF WRITER BODY: In elections two years ago, voters from Ontario to pico Rivera went to the polls to decide whether to allow card clubs in their cities. Casino backers--promising jobs and additional tax revenues--were scrambling to get them approved before Jan. 1, 1996 , when a state moratorium on new card clubs went into effect. Opponents warned that casinos would attract loan sharks, prostitutes and gangsters while destroying families--as breadwinners became addicted to gambling. Of the eight cities with casino measures on their ballots that year, only one--Hawaiian Gardens--approved a new card club. Seven other cities have defeated similar measures since 1993. All the cities are in the Southland, except for Stockton--whose election after the deadline was allowed because it involved broadening of an existing card club ordinance--and South San Francisco. What voters didn't know in any of those cases, investigators for the state political watchdog say, was that opposition to new card clubs was financed by more than $ 1 million from the Bicycle Club in Bell Gardens--a casino controlled by the U.S. government. Campaign committees opposing the new clubs had names such as Concerned Taxpayers of California and Californians Against Gaming Expansion, but they were all bankrolled by the Bicycle Club, according to a report by the state Fair political Practices Commission. "When voting on gaming initiatives, the public by and large did not know that the opposition was orchestrated by a casino controlled by the united States government, " commission investigator Richard McSherry said in court documents. The campaigns against new clubs were run so that the Bicycle Club, II and ultimately the United States government, could eliminate competition and maintain a near monopoly on casinos in the Los Angeles area," McSherry said. PAGE 63 Los Angeles Times, November 29, 1997 The report also alleges that casino campaign committees failed to properly account for donations and that some of that money was illegally diverted for personal use by the casino's top political consultant. The Los Angeles County district attorney's office, working with investigators from the state commission, is also examining payments made to the consultant. No charges have been filed in connection with either investigation, but prosecutors have called several witnesses who are scheduled to testify before the county grand jury next week. The federal government became part owner of the Bicycle Club in 1990, when the Justice Department seized a share of it in a money-laundering case. Since then, a federally appointed trustee has overseen the casino for the U.S. Marshals Service, which maintains seized properties for the department. The business has generated more than $ 30 million in profits for the Marshals Service, making it the most valuable asset ever seized by federal law enforcement. But it has also generated considerable embarrassment for the Justice Department. Critics in the U.S. Senate have accused department officials of turning a blind eye to crime in the casino, and the department's inspector general is now examining its handling of the club. Federal officials who oversaw the casino knew its history of contributing to campaigns opposing new card clubs, but they decided not to interfere in the business' political activity, a Marshals Service official said. TlThis was outside the scope of the government's responsibilities," said Kenneth C. Holecko, the agency's assistant director for business services. While federal officials defended in court the club's right to contribute to a campaign against a Cypress card club in 1993, Holecko said no one at the Marshals Service reviewed how the money was spent. Nor was anyone at the agency aware that the club failed to disclose its involvement in political activities, he said. Political practices commission investigators questioned Harry J. Richard, the former federal trustee who authorized the contributions, but the state report does not accuse him of wrongdoing. Instead, the document places much of the blame for the alleged campaign violations on George G. Hardie, the founder of the Bicycle Club, who served as its general manager until he was ousted in 1994. After Hardie's removal, Richard continued to approve checks to various political committees, the Marshals Service said. In August 1995--after most of the elections on new card clubs were over- -the agency instructed Richard to stop making contributions. But Hardie, who remains a minority owner of the club, protested that the casino wasn't doing enough to fight the remaining ballot measures in late 1995. In a statement to a Senate subcommittee last year, the Marshals Service said it told Richard at the time that "the U.S. government should not be involved in local elections or referenda." Richard ignored their instructions, according PAGE 64 Los Angeles Times, November 29, 1997 to the agency. When the Marshals Service confronted him in November 1995, Richard admitted that he had continued to fund campaign committees to oppose ballot measures, agency officials said. "The trustee stated that he had not informed the Marshals Service or the Justice Department about his actions because he knew that its officials would have opposed such contributions," the agency said. Richard, who later resigned under pressure, said in a brief interview that he did not monitor the club's political consultants closely enough to know whether they were breaking the law. "I expected the people we were working with to handle everything properly," he said. "I've never seen one campaign mailer. Ever. " Hardie insists he is being made a patsy for actions committed by Richard and his overseers in the Marshals Service. Hardie said he sent Richard and the agency copies of political mail pieces--many of which investigators for the state commission allege violated campaign laws. "The government's repeated assertion that it knows nothing about these activities is flatly false, is shameful and further erodes confidence in the integrity of the u.s. Marshals Service," Hardie wrote in a letter to Frederick S. Wyle, the Bicycle Club's current trustee. "Now the FPPC, in a quandary because they don't know how to sue the federal government, wants to go after the messenger. " Commission investigators have also focused on the club's Long Beach-based political consultant, Jerry westlund. Investigators allege that he paid at least $ 70,022 of the campaign committees' money to two companies he owned--Cal Coast Printing and Conceptual Designs. Investigators said he was not entitled to those funds. Westlund was able to make those expenditures, investigators allege, in part because David L. Gould, the treasurer for most of the campaign committees, "failed to maintain invoices for the vast majority of the expenses, but instead chose to make expenditures based on invoices prepared by or on behalf of Mr. Westlund. " Gould declined to comment. One hotly contest election cited in the report was in November 1995 in Pomona. Investigators found that three Bicycle Club committees deposited $ 40,000 during the Pomona campaign into a bulk mail account--established in the name of Cal Coast Printing--that was usually used to pay postage. In January 1996, Westlund sent a letter to the U.S. postmaster and asked that a check for $ 40,000 be issued to him from the account. The post office issued Westlund the check, but the club committees failed to properly account for the money, commission investigators said in their report. Another section of the document deals with independent contractors who received payments from the club's campaign committees. One contractor, Dave PAGE 65 Los Angeles Times, November 29, 1997 Gutierrez, was paid more than $ 34,000 for "general operations and overhead." When interviewed by authorities, however, "Mr. Gutierrez stated he did not perform any such work for the committee, but was provided checks as payment for construction services rendered on Mr. Westlund's personal property," the report said. Another contractor, Tilo Steurer, was paid more than $ 30,000 by a campaign committee for unspecified services, investigators said. Steurer, owner of a Los Alamitos car dealership, told commission investigators that he never worked for a campaign committee. He said he received checks "as payment on a loan he made to Mr. Westlund which had been secured by a 1989 Mercedes." Westlund declined to comment, referring calls to his attorney, Wayne Ordos, former executive director of the state commission. "Everything that Mr. Westlund did was designed to advance the political cause of the Bicycle Club and was endorsed by upper management," Ordos said. While the commission investigation continues, the Justice Department is eager to sell its share of the casino. But those efforts remain bogged down. Officials announced in July that they hoped the Ladbroke Group, a British gaming company, would buy the government's 36% share for $ 25 million. But under California law, a publicly traded firm such as Ladbroke can only own casino property. It cannot operate a casino. Brokers of the Ladbroke deal devised a new approach. The Justice Department would still sell to Ladbroke, but the club's partners would lease the day-to-day operation to a start-up firm! TBC Operating Co. The company comprises several attorneys from Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, a politically well-connected Century City law firm. The federal judge overseeing the case that led to the casino's seizure has approved the deal, and the Century City attorneys have applied for licenses from the state Office of Gaming Registration. "The Department of Justice is very eager to sell this asset," said Associate Deputy Atty. Gen. Paul J. Fishman, who is overseeing the sale from Washington. "The sooner that happens, the better." (BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX / INFOGRAPHIC) Behind the Scenes Fair political Practice Commission investigators believe political committees backed by the Bicycle Club casino broke campaign laws in the process of influencing elections in 15 cities. Voters were considering ballot measures that would have allowed new card clubs to open in those communities. In nearly every case, the Bicycle Club-backed opposition succeeded. 1993 * Bellflower: Ballot measure defeated PAGE 66 Los Angeles Times, November 29, 1997 * Compton: Casino approved by City Council; effort to petition for a citywide vote failed * Cypress: Ballot measure defeated * Lynwood: Ballot measure defeated * West Hollywood: Ballot measure defeated * 1994 * South El Monte: Ballot measure defeated * 1995 * Azusa: Ballot measure defeated * Colton: Ballot measure defeated * Hawaiian Gardens: Ballot measure passed * Irwindale: Ballot measure defeated * Ontario: Ballot measure defeated * pico Rivera: Ballot measure defeated * Pomona: Ballot measure defeated * South San Francisco: Ballot measure defeated * 1996 * Stockton: Ballot measure defeated GRAPHIC: PHOTO: Portions of four of the campaign mailers that are among the court exhibits in a case involving the 1995 casino vote in pico Rivera. GRAPHIC-CHART: Behind the Scenes, Los Angeles Times LANGUAGE: English LOAD-DATE: November 29, 1997 rdruv rØ7 ~~ POLICE CliIEf 8' (0 8liEQlff'8 - ~ August 6, 1992 100 FLETCHER PARKWAY EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92020 TELEPHONE (61 9) 579-3351 Mayor Maureen O'Connor and San Diego City Council City Administration Building 202 "C" Street OFFICERS San Diego, California 92101 President RE: Cardroom Casinos in San Diego County Jack Smith E Cajon Dear Mayor O'Connor and Council: Vice President Robert R. Soto La Mesa Our association has been advised of the details of a proposal made to the city of San Diego to Secretaryl Treasurer consolidate current cardroom operations into a Stan Knee National City single, multi-million dollar cardroom casino. We are also aware of an initiative on the November 1992 ballot in National City which would allow a EXECUTIVE BOARD similar facility. Please be advised that we - - Clarence Tuck considered these proposals at a regular meeting on CHP, Border Division August 5, 1992, and voted unanimously to oppose them. Robert Vales Carlsbad We are acutely aware of the financial difficulties Rick Emerson currently being experienced by local governments Chula Vista and that the potential revenues promised by Jack Drown operators of cardroom casinos may seem attractive. Coronado However, we believe the fiscal benefits are Edwin L. Miller, Jr. considerably outweighed by the negative impact District Attorney these vice-ridden businesses would have on local Vincent Jimno communities. Escondida Bruce Dunne Age-old law enforcement experience has demonstrated Oceanside that cardroom operations have fostered serious Michael $gobba criminal activity including robbery, loan sharking, San Diego Co. Marshals extortion, prostitution, money laundering and organized crime. For example, patrons of these Jim Roache establishments have been victims of home invasion San Diego Co. Sheriffs robberies which have been traced to members of Robert Burgreen street gangs associated with the clubs. A cardroom San Diego Police casino in San Diego or National city would open our Martin Hight communities to similar unlawful activity. San Diego Port District John Carpenter SDSU -- John Anderson UCSD Mayor Maureen O'Connor and San Diego City Council Page 2 August 6, 1992 We believe the proposed cardroom casinos are not in the best interest of the people we serve and urge your council and the voters in National City to reject these proposals. JACK G. SMITH President JGS:bsc cc: John W. Witt, City Attorney Jack MCGrory, city Manager Charles G. Abdelnour, City Clerk 1997 REt;. SESSION 5337 CIIAl'Tlm 867 SEe. J SEe. 2. Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 19HOO) of Division 8 of the ßusi- ncs..<; and Profc.....sÎons Code is repealed. SEe. 3. Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 19800) is added (0 Division 8 of the ßtlsinc.·~<; and Professions Code, to read: CHAPTER 5 THE GAMBLING CONTROL ACf ARTICLE I General Provisions § 19800. This chapter shall be known, and may be cited, as the "Gambling Control Act." § 19801. The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following: , (a) The longstanding public policy of this state disfavors the business of gambling. State law prohibits commercially operated lotteries, banked or percentage games, and gambling machines, and strictly regulates parimutuel wagering on horseracing. To the extent that state law categorically prohibits certain fonns of gambling and prohibits gambling devices, nothing herein shall be construed, in any manner, to reflect a legislative intent to relax those prohibitions. '-(b) Gambling can become addictive and is not an activity to be promoted or legitimized as entertainment for children and families. (c) Unregulated gambling enterprises are inimical to the public health, safety, welfare, and good order. Accordingly, no person in this state has a right to operate a gambling enterprise except as may be expressly permitted by the laws of this state and by the ordinances of local governmental bodies. (d) It is the policy of this state that gambling activities that are not expressly prohibited or regulated by state law may be prohibited or regulated by local govern- ment. Moreover. it is the policy of this state that no new cardroom may be opened in a city. county, or city and county in which a cardroom was not operating on and before Januàry I, 1984, except upon the affiOllative vote of the electors of that city, . county, or city and county. (è) It is not the purpose of this chapter to expand opportunities for gambling. or to create any right to operate a gambling enterprise in this state or -to hav~ a financial interest in any gambling enterprise. Rather, it is (he purpose of this chapter to regulate businesses that offer otherwise lawful foons of gambling gaffies. . . (f) Public trust that peOllissible gambling will not endanger public health, safety, or welfare requires that comprehensive measures be enacted to ensure - that such gambling is free from criminal and corruptive elements, that it is conducted honestly and competitively, and that it is conducted in suitable locations. (g) Public trust and confidence can only be maintained by strict and comprehensive regulation of all persons, locations, practices, associations, and activities related to the operation of lawful gambling establishments and the manufacture or distribution of permissible gambling equipment. (h) All gambling operations, all persons having a significant involvement in gambling operations. all establishments where gambling is conducted, and all manufacturers, sellers, and distributors of gambling equipment mlL')t be licensed and regulated to protect the public health, safety, and gcnerdl welfare of the residents of this slate as an exercise of the police powers of the state. (Î) To ensure that gamhling is conducted honestly, competitively, and free of crim- inal and corruptive clements, all licensed gamhling cswhlishments in (his state must remaiu open to the gen~ral public cHId the acces.... of the general public to liccnsc:...-d Italin indicatc changes or additions. * .., * indicate omis."ions. CIIAI'TER 8(,7 5333 1997 RE<;. SESSION SEC, J gambling uctivitic:s mu:-:;t not be restricted in nny manner, except ns provided by the Legislature. I-fowever, subject to state and federal prohihitions ngninst discrimina- tion, nothing herein shall be construed to preclude exclusion of unsuitable persons from licensed gambling establishments in the exercisc of reasonable business judg. I11cnt. (j) J n order to elrcc(uate state policy as declared herein, if is necessary that gambling establishments. activities, and equipment be licensed. that persons participating in those activities be licensed or registered, that certain transactions, event.s. and proce..<;scs involving gambling cstablishments and owners of gambling c.<:;[ablishmcnts be subjcct to prior approval or pcrmis.<;ion, that unsuitable persons not be permitted to a&~ociate with gambling activities or gambling establishments, and that gambling activities take place only in suitable locations. Any license or permit issued. or other approval granted pursuant to this chapter, is declared to be a revocable privilege, and no holder acquires any vested right therein or thereunder. (k) The location of lawful gambling premises. the hours of operation of those premises, the number of tables penniued in those premises. and wagering limits in pennissible games conducted in those premises are proper subjects for regulation by local governmental bodies. However, consideration of those same subjects by a state regulatory agency. as specified in this chapter, is warranted when local governmental regulation respecting those subjects is inadequate or the regulation fails to safeguard the legitimate interests of residents in other governmental jurisdictions. (l) The exclusion or ejection of certain persons from gambling establishments is necessary to effectuate the policies of this chapter and to maintain effectively the strict regulation of licensed gambling. (m) Records and reports of cash and credit transactions involving gambling establishments may have a high degree of usefulness in criminal and regulatory investigations and, therefore, licensed gambling operators may be required to keep records and make reports concerning significant cash and credit transactions. § 19801.2. The Legislature further finds and declares as follows: Appropriate regulation of banking and percentage games or of gambling devices consistent with public safety and welfare would require, at a minimwn, all of the fol- lowing safeguards: (a) The creation of an adequately funded gambling control commission with comprehensive powers to establish minimum standards and technical specifications for gambling equipment and devices. . . .' , . ; (b) The creation of an adequately funded law enforcement capability within state government ,to InSpect, test. and evaluate gambling eq~ipment and devices and modifications thereto. . . '-''',1 (c) An appropriation by the Legislaiure to sufficiently fund a full-time commission and law enforcement capability with responsibilities commensurate with the expand.o;I scope of gambling. (d) The enactment of necessary regulations setting forth standards and procedures for the licensing of persons connected with the manufacture, sale, and distribution of equipment and dcviccs in this statc. (e) The enactment of standards related to the trustworthiness and fairness of equipmcnt and devices, upon the commission's recommendation to the Legislature. (I) The enactment of statutory provL<>ions governing the importation, transporta- tion, salc, and disposal of equipment and devices, upon the commission's recommen- dation to the Legi.slature. (g) The enactment of statutes providing for appropriate íJ1spcf.:tioll and testing of cll'IÎpment and devices, upon the conllnis......ion·s recommendarion to the Legislature. ~ 19802. (a) Jt is thc intcn( of the Legislature, in enacting this chapter, to provide Italin- indicate changes or additions. -'t- ... '" indicate ornis.....ions. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item II Meeting 1m... 01/13/9S ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing To consider adoption of Seven Major Areas of Improvement I' 'v REVIEWED BY: City Manager (,j 16 SUBMITTED BY: B""gctM_"~ r Public Information Coordinat (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No..x..) The City Council previously had work sessions to discuss city-wide priorities and identify areas for improvement. On September 11, 1997, City Council completed a fmal review of the priorities and identified the seven major areas of improvement. The City Council received public comment and input on the proposed seven issues at a public hearing on October 21, 1997 and determined that an additional public comment was necessary prior to final adoption. Prior to this meeting council members will have made 14 talks to community groups, and reached out to the community in general for input via phone, mail, fax, and the Internet. In addition articles have appeared in local paper and the City's newsletter. The intent of this meeting is to allow for more public testimony and then to continue the public hearing. This will allow Council sufficient time to listen to public comment prior to making a final decision at the next meeting. RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept public testimony on the seven major areas for improvement, and continue the public hearing to January 20, 1998 at 6:00 p.m. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: All boards and commissions members were sent the listing of the seven major areas for improvement and the 63 priority projects for review and comment. Any comments received prior to distribution of this report will be included as an attachment, however, Boards and Commissions have been advised that they may want to make a presentation to Council at this meeting. DISCUSSION: The City Council had four work sessions to specifically discuss the development of city-wide priorities. They met for a total of 13 and one-half hours and narrowed a list of 226 staff priorities to a final list of approximately 63 goals and sub-goals that the City Council believed to be the highest priority for completion. At the final work session the Council selected their 7 areas of improvement. //~/ Page 2, Item I' Meeting Date 01/11/9R The Council also held two special work sessions on two of the proposed priorities of the Bayfront and Town Centre 1. During the work session on the Bayfront the Council received input from the following groups: Yacht Harbor Coalition, Bayfront Conservancy Trust, Environmental Health Coalition, San Diego Audubon Society, Rohr, the Port District, Save Our Bay, SDG&E, and several citizens. At the work session on Town Centre I Project Area, which represents Third Avenue, the Council received further input from the Downtown Business Association, Chamber of Commerce, Southwestern College Small Business Development and International Trade Center, Economic Development Commission, Sweetwater Union High School District and several Third A venue business owners. Through this process a total of six major goal areas were identified with sub-goals under each of these m'\Îor headings. (See Attachment A) From this total list of approximately 63 different goals or projects, each Council member selected their top 8 priorities. By matching those selections Council identified 7 projects or goals which they agreed were the highest priority. The top seven (7) priorities identified are Bayfront, Downtown Revitalization, Broadway Revitalization, Otay Valley, Educational Center/Environmental Institute, SR-125 and Revenue Enhancement. After completion of this process, Council determined that the term, "priorities" did not truly reflect the intent of the Council. This term was changed to, "The Seven Major areas of Improvement," as these projects represent important areas in the city that are in need of staff and resources to implement plans to improve them. A brief description of each of these follows: R~yfrnnt Continue the redevelopment and replanning of the Bayfront Project Area to errcourage and facilitate quality visitor-serving commercial, recreational and residential development for the undeveloped coastal related properties west of 1-5 between SR-54 and "L" Street. The redevelopment and replanning efforts are to include furthering the joint planning process with the San Diego Port Commission toward the collective goal of expanding the Bayfront Project Area boundaries to include the Port District properties adjacent to the Chula Vista Yacht Harbor, extending "H" Street westerly to Marina Parkway and establishing the Chula Vista Bayfront as a resort destination. Ot~y V~l1ey Continue the redevelopment and replanning of the Otay Valley Road Project Area to encourage and facilitate quality commercial, entertainment, recreation and industrial development along the Otay Valley Road corridor between 1-805 and the eastern and southern City limits. The ) /---;¿ Page 3, Item II Meeting Date 01 /11/QR redevelopment and replanning efforts are to capitalize and expand on the opportunities created by the Auto Park, MCA Amphitheater and White Water Canyon projects toward the goal of improving the image and character of the area, and creating a commercial/recreational hub for the region. Third Avp.nup. - Downtown Continue the revitalization of the Town Centre I Downtown District along Third A venue from "E" to "I" Street by encouraging and facilitating quality infill commercial and office development as well as attracting quality commercial tenants. The revitalization efforts are to include continued marketing, leasing, and image enhancement programs with the Downtown Business Association toward the goal of re-establishing the Downtown as the commercial-civic focus of the City. Rrm:uiw~y Rpv;t~H7~tinn Implement a focused revitalization effort along the Broadway commercial corridor to impede the proliferation of blighting influences and encourage quality commercial/retail development. The revitalization effort should include coordination with the Broadway Business Association and further the progress made with the Palomar Trolley Center, the auto dealership relocations, and the completed Broadway Street improvements, and could include a "pilot" area for focused revitalization. Hiehp.T FLiIlC':::Ition rp.ntp.r/Fnv1ronmp.nt~1 ~r.ipnC':p.s: Tns:titnte Continue to advance the planning for a "Higher Education Center and Environmental Sciences Institute" concept to involve the establishment of a single campus which would house academic programs from San Diego State University, University of California at San Diego, and Southwestern College with emphasis in the areas of high technology and biotechnology, as well as environmental research and commerce. The planning efforts should include further definition of organizational structure, academic and research focus, as well as siting and financial issues. SR-I?'i Continue to support the construction of a Freeway/Tollroad to serve the eastern area north south traffic movement. The facility will be a 6 to 10 lane divided and controlled access highway built to freeway standards beginning at I-90S in Otay Mesa and traversing north to SR-54. The project has regional funding in the amount of $70 million (approx) to pay for the San Miguel Connector (between SR-54 and San Miguel Rd.) It is important to keep political interest and support for the funding with State, Federal, and local elected officials. ///3 Page 4, Item /I Meeting Date O1111/9R Improve c.ity Revenlle< R~"" Continue to focus on increasing the revenue base for basic City services, actively participate in lobbying efforts to "return" funds taken from the State, limit the use of one-time revenue sources, make progress toward the Council goal of an 8 % reserve, and generally ensure an improvement in the City's long term financial stability. PUBLIC NOTICE At the previous meeting Council approved the implementation of the following methods to encourage public input into this process: · Pre« Relf'-"I<e: A press release was sent and media contacts made which resulted in articles published in the San Diego Union-Tribune, Chula Vista Star News, the Independent Community Post and the Chula Vista Eagle. (Attachment B) · Infnrm~tinn Nntic.e nn Televi<f'n C.nllndl Mf'.etine;<: An informational message was provided prior to the October meetings and before this meeting. · "C.hlll~ Vi<t~ QII~rterly": A story was included in the City's newsletter which was published in late December. This newsletter reaches virtually every household and business in the City. Approximately 26,000 are mailed to Laidlaw single-family household customers and another 31,000 are directly mailed to multi-family dwelling units and businesses. (Attachment C) · Servic.e c.1l1h Pre<entMinn<: The Mayor and/or City Council members have given presentations to 14 different service organizations in Chula Vista. A listing of these meetings and some general comments are attached. (Attachment D) · Pllhlicity in Other New<letter<: A press release was submitted to other community organizations for publication in their newsletters including the Rancho del Rey and EastLake developments, the Chamber of Commerce, Downtown Business Association, Broadway Business Association, Bonita Business and Professional Association and South County Economic Development Corporation. · C.ity Weh Site: Information about the priorities was placed on the city's web site which allowed for direct E-mail responses. There were 123 "web site hits" from November 6 through December 22. In Attachment E are four (4) E-mail responses as a result of the web site information. · Vnic.e-M~il: The voice-mail box set up has received five (5) responses, which have been transcribed in Attachment F. //-l( . Page 5, Item )( Meeting Date 01/I,I9R . Rn~ro ~no C.ommi«ion Mf>mhf>r<: Each City board and commission member was sent a letter detailing the identified priorities and asking each group or individual to provide any input regarding these areas for improvement to the Council. In response to these letters, a presentation was made to the Board of Ethics, and two (2) letters from individuals were received along with a letter from the GMOC. (Attachment G) There may be presentations by some Boards and Commissions at tonight's public hearing. . EJ¿æ.r: A flyer summarizing the Council's seven priorities was placed in the City's libraries, counters at City Hall and in other City facilities. This flyer included a section detailing ways the community could give input. (Attachment H) ONGOING PROCESS The process recently completed by the City Council has provided valuable direction to staff to establish a better plan for achieving these identified priorities. However, the areas for improvement are stated very generally and Council has not had sufficient time to provide further details. In order to assist Council with this process, staff is in the process of developing a draft action plan for each of the seven areas of improvement. A process to prepare this action plan is currently being developed. An Informational Memo will be provided to Council to provide details on this process and provide suggestions for further implementation. In order for Council to regularly evaluate priorities, it is recommended that a semi-annual review be incorporated into the budget process. Annn~1 Prioritif>< Worhhop Since the Council has identified the need for one workshop per month, it would be recommended that the September workshop be set aside for an annual review of the Council's priorities. This would set the tone, clarify any changing priorities to work plans so that they can then be incorporated into the beginning phase of the budget process. By having Council's direction and input prior to the department's budget development, it will ensure that the budget is prepared with that input in mind rather than adjusted later as a result of Council feedback. Rn0B:f>t Rf>vif>w Work Sf>«ion< In addition to the annual workshop, it is critical that the priorities actually appear as part of the budget document. One way to do this, which fits well within the new budget format, is to incorporate these priorities into the "goals" of the City Council as listed with the Council's budget. Since "goals" are general in nature, these broad priorities would fit into the current structure very well. During the budget review work sessions in May, the Council may then take another look at the priorities and revise them as necessary. /I--J __ ___ _._~.m._.. ._u,w·_.·,.__~ Page 6, Item JI Meeting Date 01/11/QR These two review periods will provide for semi-annual review of Council's priorities and incorporation of those priorities into the budget process. FISCAL IMPACT: The semi-annual review of the City Council's priorities will not create additional direct costs. If the Council desires to implement any of the additional options for public input, those costs identified would need to be included in the budget. In order to accomplish these proposed priorities, it may be necessary to reduce the prioritization of other projects or reallocate staff and other resources. Implementation plans and budgets to accomplish these priorities have yet to be developed by the impacted departments. Such items will be brought back to Council as appropriate, either within the current fiscal year or as part of the workshop process for the 1998-99 budget. Attachments: ~~'^ Additional Council Priority Goals ment B Various Newspaper Articles chment C Fall/Winter '98 Chula Vista Quarterly .. ttachment D Service Club Presentations r§' Attachment E Four E-Mail Responses ~ Attachment F Five Voice Mail Responses Attachment G Two Individual Letters of Response From Two Board/Commission Members and one Commission Response from the GMOC Attachment H Blue Informational Flyer H,IHOMEIADMINICCPRlA3.WPD /J~~ ----- --.--.-.- --~-_...._-- - Jr// ATTACHMENT A ADDITIONAL COUNCIL PRIORITY GOALS: In order to be the best that the City of Chula Vista can be in preparation for the twenty-first century, the following goal areas are proposed: . Insure Long-Term Financial Stability 1. Balance budget by: · reducing expenditures · reducing reliance on one-time revenues · continue to bring Redevelopment Agency out of the red 2. Implement three-year financial plan · investment policy · potential revenue streams · examine future needs 3. Continue utilization of performance-based budgeting · establish measures/ standards · how do we know when we "get there"? . Promote Economic Development 1. Attain four-star quality hotels/resorts within city limits 2. Review all franchise and other agreements a. SDG&E b. Cox Cable c. Laidlaw d. Electric Utility Restructuring 1 -- -- -.----- '~'-"-'-'-- 3. Promote individual economic development projects a. IDEC b. School administration building relocation c. WERE d. EastLake Business Park e. BEA 4. Joint corporate yard . Promote Quality of Life Indicators 1. Air Quality - an.nual rejX>rt required from Air Pollution Control District on impact of growth on air quahty. 2. Fiscal - annual report required to evaluate impacts of growth on city operations, capital improvements, and development impact fee revenues and expenditures. 3. Police - respond to 84 % of the Priorit1' I emergency calls within 7 minutes and maintain avera~e responded time of 4. minutes. Respond to 62 % of Priority II urgent calls wit in 7 minutes and maintain average response time of 7.0 minutes. 4. FirelEMS - respond to calls within 7 minutes in 85 % of the cases. 5. Schools - annual report required to evaluate school district's ability to accommodate new growth. 6. LibTöõd'rovide 500 square feet of library space adequately equipped and staffed per I, population. 7. Parks and Recreation - maintain 3 acres of neighborhood and community parkland with ~propriate facilities ~r 1,000 residents east of Interstate 805, and continue to ev uate the quality an condition of the parks 8. Water - annual report from water service agencies on impact of growth and future water availability 9. Sewer - sewage flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Annual report from metropolitan Sewer Authority on impact of growth on sewer capacity. 10. Drain~e - storm flows and volume shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Annu report reviewing performance of city's storm drain system. 2 Ii. Traffic - maintain Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better as measured by observed average travel sßeed on all sir,naliZed arterial streets, except, that during peak hours, an LOS" "can occur or no more than any two hours of the day. Those signalized intersections west of Interstate 805 that do not meet the above standard may continue to operate at their 1991 LOS, but shall not worsen. 12. Higher Education - (has not been officially adopted by the City Council) . Evaluate and Assess Land Use and Planning i. Process land use plans effectively and efficiently while implementing and protecting the City's policy interests. 2. Review and update land use projects: A. Project Specific (1) Replanning EastLake III (2) San Miguel Ranch - next phase (3) Salt Creek Ranch (a.k.a. Rolling Hills Ranch) (4) Otay Ranch SPA I (including West Coast land change of ownership) (5) University (6) Lower Sweetwater Area Plan (7) Sun bow B. Area wide (1) DIF Update (2) Prepare Master Plans for Fire, Parks, and Library (3) Restudy Development Phasing Plan (4) Finalize Agreement with County for Preserve Owner Manager 3 . Update Administrative Policies and Procedures 1. Look at incorporating performance-based budgeting process for budget planning - to be completed prior to July I, 1997 2. Examine the benefits of multi-year or two-year budget process as an approach - to be completed prior to July I, 1997 3. Examine a short-term Financial Plan as a possible benefit to the City - to be completed by January 1998 4. Staff review and recommend a policy-review cycle (3 year, 4 year, whatever) - within next 3-4 months 5. Staff to develop systematic way to prioritize individual land use requests 6. Staff work on developing a long-term strategic economic development plan. . Promote and Influence Regional Issues Maintain a presence and/or achieve a role at meetings involving regional issues which have ~tential impact on Chula Vista (e.g. SANDAG, Water, Trash, Brown Field, NAFTA, obs Training, Regional Librl!lY Bond, Regional Work/Force and Employers Center, MSCP, Sewer-wastewater, 905, Regional Transit issues, Welfare Reform Impacts). H:\HOME\ADMIN\DAWN\GOALS.A13 4 - ~~~ ATTACHMENT B =~~-~ --~--~- ~ ..;;;::----- - - -- -. CITY OF CHULA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER NEWS RELEASE CONTACT: Jeri Gulbransen, Public Information Coordinator, 691-5296 Dawn Herring, Budget Manager, 691-5031 For immediate release Oct. 14, 1997 PUBLIC INPUT SOUGHT ON CHULA VISTA CITYWIDE PRIORITIES OCT. 21. 28 Community input is being sought by the Chula Vista City Council on its proposed top seven citywide priorities for 1997-98 during the Oct. 21 and 28 City Council meetings. Set to begin at 6 p.m., both meetings will be held in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center complex, 276 Fourth - Ave. " The top seven priorities identified by the City Council during a series of workshops are the bayfront, downtown revitalization, Broadway revitalization, Otay Valley redevelopment, higher education center/environmental sciences institute planrùng, SR-125 support, and revenue enh~cement. These were identified from a list of approximately 63 goals and sub-goals that the City Council recognized as having the highest priority for completion. A brief description of each of the Council's top seven proposed priorities follows. . Bavfront: Continue the redevelopment of the Bayfront Project Area to facilitate quality visitor- serving commercial, recreational and residential development for the undeveloped coastal properties west ofI-5 between SR-54 and L Street. . Otav Vallev: Continue the replanning efforts to expand the opportunities created by the auto ---MOREm 276 FOURTH AVENUE' CHULA VISTA' CALIFORNIA 91910' (6191691·5031 . FAX (619) 585·5612 :::'Pos!-~'~~_< - ------_.~._-- --- -_.~--^'-'-'-'- - 2-2-2-PUBLIC INPUT SOUGHT ON CHULA VISTA CITYWIDE PRIORITIES ,..---.. park, MCA amphitheater and White Water Canyon water park, and improve the image and . character of the area. · Third Avenue - Downtown: Continue the marketing, leasing and image enhancement programs with the Downtown Business Association toward the goal of re-establishing downtown as the commercial/civic focus of the city. · Broadwav Revitalization: Coordinate with the Broadway Business Association to implement a focused revitalization effort along the Broadway commercial corridor and further the progress made with the Palomar Trolley Center, the auto dealership relocations, and completed street improvements. · Hi¡:-her Education Center/Environmental Sciences Institute: Continue to advance planning ~ for a "Higher Education Center and Environmental Sciences Institute" concept to involve the establishment of a single campus which would house academic programs from San Diego State University, University of California at San Diego and Southwestern College with emphasis in the area of high technology and biotechnology, as well as environmental research and commerce. · SR-125: Support the construction of a state route to serve the eastern area rrom I-90S in Otay Mesa and traversing north to SR-54. · Improve City Revenues Base: Focus on increasing the revenue base for basic city services, actively participate in lobbying efforts to "return" funds taken rrom the state, limit the use of one-time revenue sources, make progress toward the Council goal of an eight percent reserve, and ensure improvement in the city's long-tenn financial stability. ---MORE--- CITY OF CHULA VISTA 3-3-3-PUBLIC INPUT SOUGHT ON CHULA VISTA CITYWIDE PRIORITIES ~, For further infomlation or a copy of the agenda statement, interested residents may contact the City Clerk's office in City Hal!, 276 Fourth Ave., or phone 691-5044. City Council meetings are televised at 7 p.m. on Wednesdays on Cox Cable Channel 24 and Chula Vista Cable Channel 47. --30-- " '~ CITY OF CHULA VISTA - -----~-~..."""----_.._..---_.__. ~~ (0/2->-/'17 - Top~7' ,priorities hea,ring d~awsanemiêrespolÎse ..¡.,,';...,.-. ~'~'",,- . . . ,. ..",'*,.1-.""".,. '.,. _ ....,' ". ,...., '.,. ". ' , t·,".;:. ·t',,' ",'." . < ,',. _":.' _'",' ',', . ~.ThêTtis.~Dells;' "'.;~:~:·>--·Broa-d\yay·_coi.r1Ynerciaf COT- should be placed in the 1i~ '. Rèpò;re'l1i-'? .<: . ,~:.:;. ',;-. ridór;continwng to advance braries' ànd council mem- , --~~;~:"~~~"~:~.:.':: _,.~<_.~:;, ,the. plø:in~I1g..f9:r a "Higher be~s should make..presen- _.~"'-Þ<~~_":'p"êf". .<: "j """"k Education. GeJ:l,ter. aqdEn-- tations to the"vanous ser- '@' >! one person spo e. t81S" '. I ti ", 'ti" th .' -...~. ,!-"t"â"èliula ViétØ. City VlTopmen.." .Clence~ _. os, -' ,":ce ',<>;rgamza ans]n e f:(,}.êõ··....S.'"I· ~lí h" tutè;" can'tinmng toSUp&ort CIty. . -- ,:' unCI p c ear-. . '. _ . ,'.' ''''hi h~' 'd' "tJÍ ,the construction .of a ee-' - -- -- --..- l~.f.VI ,c ~u8!. '. ~n.. e way/tollroad to' serve - the .C1ty'S to~ seven pnontie~. eastern' area north ~-south Counel members deeded affi '. . d to te d th ti . ~h' bl' . tr c movement; an con- ex n e me epu IC , .' '-,' fI'-" . can spea]f ôn' the'·priorities. ~n~ng to ocus on lnCTeas: A . dpubli . hèaring' is 109 the revenue base f~r be- . sec~n ,', c:'_ " sicciijr' services and 'actively schedtÙed for the next coun- . rti . . ti· . I bb . cil meeting~. Titesd8y,-, Oct: - pa cpa ng "In» 0 ymg 28.Ari. Unpl,.,med third u- efforts to "return_ funds ta- blic. heàring has been sehe- kenfi-0n: the s~te,. . duled fòr Jan. 13. ÇQun.el!"an Steve F'adilla . The seven tóp priotities saIa this ]5 an evoluti,?nary the city has right now are: Process, not _ the fin~shed Continuing the redeve- p~uct. More~ publ~c m~ut lopment and replanning of IS needed, ~hICh WIll bnng the bayfront area; continu-: mor~ deta:ilsand refine- ing, the redevelopment and ment. . , _ r~p]anning of the Otay VaI- Counelman John Moot . ley Road Project Area; con- sood even If,It ~es a lot of- tinuing,the,revi~lization of effort, the CIty ~':',~t ~e~ ~~e the Town. Centré I D.own- word out to ~he pubhc. '.' , town District along Third . Moot said copies òfthe top' Avenue from E to I streets; s,even .priórities- should, be _ "implementing a focused ,re-; 'sent, to an volun~eT board vitalization _ effort along the; members and gen.era1 flyers .. . ¡ ,. ............., ..~7tA....; II-Z¿t--~7 . '. ReaderllSts·pnorities/problems. Editòr; . . , city ahd for necessary'ser- including one car in the' past 6) The city's infi-astruc.· Star·N ews reporter vices. If expansion makes a year, someone inthe police ture appears to be over- Theresa Delia did a goodjob city rich then Los Angeles. department has written our loaded. For example, driving of uncovering the reasons would be very rich, but we. neighborhood off as one in on East H Street one. ~t'ten for public non-participation all know the truth about which nothing ever hap- feels that it's dangerous to in .. input· concerning the: that. But w01'se~or us~ if we . pens.. - But .µ-y "getting are- do so. Try observing ~ the ChulaVista City Council's wish 'to selF óur 'homePwe'" sþonse tõ anything except a speed limits and one is priorities. - '. may' weU_reCeive leSs than dire èmergency such as a nearly run over. Traffic ~ with much of what the we paid for it. homicide. lights along Broadway and council discusses. it all 2) Chula Vista city Coun- 4) Some on the city council F'ourth Avenue appear to be seems to be a done ~a18!ld,;: cil __su.,~ \, development, appear to represent special coordinated for traffic halt reflects little Qfwhat,many butthecitycan'tcareforthe interest grou~S with money rather than traffic move- ordinary ·citizens feel· is im';' areas a1r~ady developed. rather than t e average citi- ment. Traffic bunches up at portent. . . Many of the streets in south zen. Perhaps district rep- the red light creating a Here is a partia1list of my .ChulaVistaare in appalling resentation would be a congestion scenario. It's al- . priorities/problems. for, dis· condition.Furthernorth,;try method for increasing re- mos,tas though someone has cussion. Unlike the council, . G Strset between Broadway sponsibility to the people decided that if traffic is aI- I'm willing to precede this and" Fifth' . Avenue. Every who of course must pay the ways ~topped there can be with an acknowledgment morning I take a two-mile biBs and live with the con- no 8CCldents. _' thatImaybeall wet. walk and I need to watch for. Sequenè" of 'council de- . . 7)Thereisapl~i" of roof 1) Unbridled city expan- . deteriorating'.and' uneven cisions-._ __.." ... , rats. in' our, neig borhood. sion has resulted in a de- sidewalks, .... .:' '. '.." S)"·People. who visitímd·. ,Perhaps this is a conse-' crease of the value of our 3) There IS very little· shop in' the Third Avenue quence of the. destructIOn of ho!"e in,'.an e~t8:blished po~ice' protection in .öW"·· where there are·, parking' habitat .of· the hawks and neIghborhood. ThisIs f¡eat nelghb,orhood. .Certa1nly meters 'must pay an addi- owls which used to he1p con- for our p~~ tax bi~ þut. this is. not the fault of the tional tax for doing so be- tr91 such pests: makes a heothè,·_pbilfJ6(.)-'~··officers on. the streets. De-causeofthosemetersinàd- _ÇhulaVista·has been a phy that· ~i>anaion: broa;' 'spite a.t least two attempted' dition to' the taxes they and ' nice place in which to live. dens the ety tax. base. :: bre.ak-md'Jj'0 acts of wan- '.the businesò ownerS already We can 001: that the ety Lowered assessed value ·ton· van 'sm;' tWoaban- ·--pay. This Seems very much coun.cil will able to keep it means less revenue for the donments of stole.~ property to bé dóuble taxation. . so, but they must work to Council's priorities , fail to draw interest #.A ¡;:. ~ ~ (ð-¡'""' ~7 Theresa Delia groups. Reporter A.]though he knows it's not City Council Seeks Community Inl true, Schulman said the way onlY a few people the priorities are Jisted, it spoke at the second of sounds like the council Community input is being on Cox Cable Channel 2' three public hearings doesn't care about people. sought. by !he Chula Vista City Chula Vista Cable Channel set by the Chula Vista City ","'m>, .."" mo,,, ~ Council on Its proposed topseven. . '.-c~·'"-,--~.~- Council on the city's seven he admires Chamber of _. citywide priorities for 1997-98 -...... .' . ..... , Commerce Executive Direc.: , priorities. Most of the com· during. the O~t~ 21 and 28 City':.'. .': . ments were directed at how tor Rod Davis, he represents . . Counctlmeetmgs. Setto begin at . ." . ,. little attention' the council a sOC>c1al interest and his gaVE> to the public when for- opinion shouJd not be the ", . 6 pm, both meetings will be held '. mulating the priorities. on1yone. incouncil chamberS at the Civic' Ricnard Schulman, who is Councilwoman Mary Center coIt)plex, 276 Fourth Ave. ' chainnan of the city's board Salas agreed with Schulman . . The top seven priorities iden- of ethics, said he is dis. that most of the "public" . llfied by the City Council during a appointed in the way the who attended had some· series of workshops are the bay counciJ informed the public. thing to either gain or lose. He said even as a chairman But she said thl:' counei} did front, downtown revitalization of a board, he did not know try to get the public in· Broad~ay revitalization, Otaý meetings were taking place valved. She said often the ....... Valley' redevelopment, higher to decide on the city's priori· public comes out for issues ...... education center/environmental ties. that really don't affect them I sciences instiíuté planning, SR- Whi1e he faulted rumself and pass up opportunities to ...... 125 support and revellueenhance- partially for not being contribute to something im· \r aware, he said he didn't portant, ) men!. These were identified form' know the couocn wanted his Jeri Gulbransen, public I a list of approxinîately 63 goals opinion. information coordinator for "'0 II!Id sub-goals that the City Coun- Schu1man said the city the city, said there will be '\1 cd recognized as having the high- has already come up with more notice to get residents est priority for è )mpletion. the priorities, so what the to the third public hearing For further information, or a public has to say win not in January. Press releases copy of the agenda statement in- carry that much weight. have been sent to Jocal "The train - has left the papers, the chamber, the terested residents may contaci the station," Schulman, Downtown Business Asso· City Clerk's office in City Hall, The public should have cintion and the Broadway 276 Fourth avenue; or phone 691- had a chance to speak before Business Association. An ar· 5044. City Council meetings are the priorities were narrowed tiele Ylill be in the next issue televised at 7 pm on Wednesdays down, not after. There is no of the "Chu]a Vista Quar· mention of residents he said, ter!y," the city's newsletter. -- --. just tourists and businesses. She said the infonnation For example, there is no can a180 be put on the city's word an the changes in the web site, given to board and welfarE' system and what af· commission members and feCI.. that will have on people. flyers can be put up in Ii· There is also no mention of braries nnd other public friction between racial meeting places, .....,...-_._~ -.,. .._,._..~._.__._. vir 1/- ~ -'17 Goals Chula Vista plans Chula Vista releases a traveling show list of top priorities to tout priorities Continuedfrom B-1 "'. Richard Schulman, a resident By Luis Monteagudo Jr. and chairman of the city Ethics' Board, complained to council mem- STAFF WRiTER bers last week that the city should CHULA VISTA - David Letterman has his Top 10 have sought public input before cre- list. Chula Vista now has a Top 7. ating the list. It's a list of the city's top seven priorities, ranging UThe train has left the station}" from developing the waterfront to revitalizing down· Schulman said, "What I say now town. about priorities, or what any other But, like one of Letterman's jokes gone flat, Chula citizen says, isn't going to carry a Vista's list has been met with silence, lot of weight. . . . The whole proce- There's been little public interest in the list, with dure is backward." one recent Schulman's point was valid, coun-, "We have to try meeting on the cil members say. But they· added city's priorities thàt the list isn't final, and they are. attracting only seeking more input. even harder in one resident. To give your oPinion on the Chula advertising what Some blame Vista's priorities, call the city at apathy, some (619) 409·5800, Call the mayor or cynicism. and council members at (619) we're doing." one resident said 691-5044. E-mail the city at lvig· the city just napiano@ci.chula·vista.ca.us. Or Shirley Horton, didn't do a good send a letter to 276 Fourth Ave:; enough job' of Chula Vista, CA 91910. Chula Vista mayor getting word out about priorities. What's a city City's waterfront, to do? Road show! Over the next several weeks, city officials plan to get downtown are focus word out about the Top 7 by speaking at Kiwanis and Rotary club meetings and other functions. of 'Top 7' goals list ,. There also will be a story in the city's quarterly 'I newsletter, which is mailed to most households. And Chula Vista's top seven information will be posted on the city's Internet web goals (not ranked by priority): , site. Members of city boards and commissions will be · Develop the waterfront . asked for their input, and fliers will be posted on public area. buildings, including libraries and City Hall. · Continue planning efforts It all will lead up to a Jan. 13 hearing on the matter. in the Otay Valley. Not everyone is happy with the process. · Market the Third Ave- nue-downtown area. See GOALS on Page B·3 · Revitalize Broadway's commercial corridor, · Create a high-tech educa- tion center. · Support construction of state Route 125. . , · Improve the city's reve· nue base to ensurefinanciak stability. :, ~ " - --.......- --_._'"---------,~ , ... I.:::' I· Q' ~ ~ M @£ CU .~~ È~ È >15'~ »~ .....~ ~.....C ... ........ .... 0""- I-oO¡;:¡ _..... u m Q)C)~.c.c¡:: ,.Qt¡)Þ.O_1-o a,) Q.) 1-01-0 '-¡:;'~ :::!:1: ',., æ ,;-~.Š.2 ~.~ ~~~ §.§ .; ~.§10 § ~.~ :~ , ...·...ca,) s::: II)O:'=-"'~ c ocuo .~.".. r" :,' E: - Q,) 0 V,I .3 1-0 , .3 CCI _.... (1) = CO 5 0 f t) "'":I.... '5 Q,. ~ ~.::_' .,co- ... .. t'CI.. ~_. ,/1) "0= .."'-. ( ,) >. u_<::; . ".".,. .; -f" ::II "0 In ..... co ...... Q.) co .. ~ _0 . ~ " .., ...:>. .... s::: .... Q) a.. >~.>¡.,. :_".", c·... .... 'Q" ...... g,--...... '0 .... ~....... -.... )( t:: "¡,#._' ,;:",.C:'i:>":::r...-Îit,= Q)'~~'''' f C!I....·~-d·_Cl:S"'"' ;.,...... as I-o~>.;:::r .... 0 =. ,Q) § ". ....-., ""1¡t' d,w "u '.-' (, .......(.I o, -0 Co.o ::s...._ 1-0 Q) Q) ..~'_..-... "-"- CICI::: ~~'>~o=":-.......-..,-;rn....,·~""-=--' ·:200·....... ~o..a,-- --t. 0', .,..' ,,' ' . ......c0:4.,.". _,' -" _', ' .::S tU,Q,I w -. t.)......... -'.- ,. 3!..... t >., r.¡l'.Jct":·N;,('f/¡CD·_'o,-~·~t:'.3'4);t:,.s·"',"··~ Q) Q)- a =·,·;:<..af-I-oo Q)-, !'t:i.... 4it¡"i , ,,',' ,,'c' 'it~-,4~c:r::U:..."> Q) =,."'.d-,=:Q).,.>,_~ y a..._= ",:,Q)ti '-,a..., :1-0.;" _cuo .,."r;<-ó,( .,i,'i.;".',I' '-,i.,'·"','''''''',:....ü~~'¡'O.V~~·" . ,!;5l{~¡-,,;:;êY-.. .-;... ~".~ Q,.:l....,Q"~oÇI-¡,,.I-o,b.Oo 0 ..".d,_. 0 O-~,::S" ,-~.... :.;.' ",'-',"'+'-+','~ "",,..=,m_' <',",,""', , -',< r'~," ',_"-,~',,- """".. ,""""_ ,b.O_,"'- ",~,_", -".. .. ",.', "W .~r'.'~""~':t,~~''@I¡ìiL CI.h'@\;¡¡; l:' " " ... i: >, ... >,>,;t: "" -= ".... - ." . "0 ", , . f1 ,!;..!J .,....- - .' ¡, .- -',-,;:,,':_~::'~<~,·::~~;-~.1;;;l~k:.t!..-~;~tt:f~~. CD~:-".('!t' ït'·~' = Gi a,) 'ãi ~.o:'ãi 8'S_, Q)....- ~ 0.;; E.E·ü f..o '¡,.¡f;;;,~ ': '-ClS!2 ~' . ..... ,1_<:_",_"",:,.(,~,·"I"""7."IóI-',>.."'~~"".µ",~",,· ,¡;,,,,"1'<::':"" ;¡':"i"'~'''''''''_...c:!...... cw C ""CW", ..!"'I..... ...,'"" ',,' " ,,-1-0" ~'''::::,I:; _;j:_"*':",""<_{:~;l',-:~i¡,~'-"~"'i";";::'!~\~:":¡'::,,_,:,,~:1!:!'''':!;';;,..=:ri'_i....~"..,;:=....'+J,w.~'.::;'4).:; Q);,~ g'-.a,),- C,Q,I'" ~......,' '::s~ .12.. (j,' ;='~;,:;.t,·::":'f«\~1t:~~t~t(~f'~·~:tf:~~·;;r;~;>,~l~ ¡-,;Š\~.~~~'~~. ~-'~-å:~'~ ~,~ g,~ ~',~ ~~.~~~~:...t~>~~ ~. ..,-......,..)~;.. - --, )~' :'t". ~ :'~"f:."è::~? "'; ;;~~~~f:: =?,!"::~)t ¡¡ - : ,;;.,:0::: ._~"';-; .-.... .~' '-" ..":' '.:.':' .. ".... y . ' .,,;: ·;;;'.S" .~ ~ ~ ., '::1 . CICI '. E·,.'" ,. "":E >, '0" .,. . ..':' ',"-. (1' 0E-4~. ô~6 it-.. ' ~~:~;., . .',.".~,;,:;,:,: ".. ~ ..' :~;; ~'~ "> ._.. ,.... ,,>' w.., '.,,;,., _'" '_'>. -. I ""a,)- -,~,.!."., -~, <U ..~~'I-.~_......¡.,.... "t:S''- Q):f -. ~,.. ...' J~. ·......+..·~~rñcu "'" '. .-" ,f' :::5a,):Eë;ë; ....:.:>t'tj:; ,,,,,:(~iì..c;~O-Ò'd).£CI.1.,:;.c- <:6,::;,'- ~'<;,. ::.....f.r i;':' \, 'Q.~~:s C $:,,'f.., ,:-g ".:l} '.:.~.E ":: :5 g\O'O] J~ ~:~':>- /!J) 0 :wt:',lt\"";:\!'Q1 Q).r!Z13~';:;_~·~;:: o'g~· ,....1,/:~ ':_'.';'; .~~~_~--..:3"O "r~", 'o"g·- a>!"O;C'j5 ~.~''''j~=/~ -','"1:tÒf >lY·~Ò g,'t:S::::~:..{- >'O.~~~O~l%4e H'\"i-::·",:n.'" ,,:: . ,)~ "'~ _ ~ ~."-...ø::.... 8~ CI C-".,~ ~Q).Q)..a,).--:-..." '. Jt::_....":iQ)...~~. .....'1".2' O:.;.f-:cd,,!2-~'''U1o: xþ·ø.t:~'";..O 1:,'....'/...... .'-; Iiiiiiiii;~'- - ;" ._~ Q): ~ ''O-ø' ....:5'1:10 ... ~ ="t:S4.a:: ~,cu CCO...._~-A ~- -Q).-=i ,...Q,O Q,I-ø ~"'~ >'\.'''<;¡{:~'~.f~>;:.;: " :1!",,\;'~d,2: ~ .:l " .\ to -g ;.;:: _~ I:f 1î':: "4):ci~i.-; ~.~- ~ ;; ~ g- ~"" ~ ~. ~ Q,la.:"CU:Clo"~\':;(,'~~,g a:: =~~~\ ~-:;; Q) .. :{,""',';---"" ''',,'''; 1II"',va,)- CI~· _ =.....- 0 _ ....w Ct::I~jJ-'" g - ~. "',,-, ...., ¡;;... ".... ·_··J'1IJUQOO CI- ''f'''-'-~- ,..... :(~ '_0 ; "." _ __I U f:! Q) . ',..c;.... û ~.~:= 8 8.:3 ~ClH~"-' ~ " CI <U '. O.CI <U Q,I ~ U ::S';.;--Q) .....ã) 0 {/J,";Jé,::S {/J' ~ ....": '.. - 8 . -> ..~ f..,;; Y = 0.'.... -,....\ ~ a,)"- ,'.... Ct::I ~ C. b. E > -ø.c:;):.... CI - t.) '0 ~-l 0 ~l'.co_ ~". -. ~ ì':â~:~~·t~,>.~~~~-g~~:f·.2~~£~..ã·'-j.3-s:~' ,.~~!~~= g.:a'S~:3 ¡ ~'~'; g;'ãi ¡ ;~-g~~ ¿".. = ' ~:~' ~'[;,;}\)ig.¡¡¡;~~:f~:~. ~~:::ë ~{lß .~ '<5: :. :,. r2 3' ~ .9 ~. ~ åÆ ~ ~ ] ~ §'~.~ ~ .j ~ ~' ~ g ,:~' ", ...... &..~o¡ u·8-~\C":::t¥:=:4)~0·t='\3 +r~ .~',CI .... a:s.~ 1; ~ , ~ ë 0.... Q,I CI 4) =:=._.- -g.~ a,) :;.~ CI: ,Of'-- , -'.," ., cuQ)Q)·_f..¡.-""o~~,~.........<S=-,::s=a...OI-o..... ~_o".d::sO.dI-oY.~.;:=o=O's::{/J goQ,l"C,,"9 , ,,1fI/a - s-ø.d.....' CD·-....'O ::so- -S.....ø.. Q) 1-0 o.Y .- ~ s::.-........ ='"CI Ct::I..... 1-0 <u = g....... , #'¥.." '~.2t.s; ~~l'~=~'-~{¡tgii;¡ i~·s.8..9.êâ·~.§ ~ : ~~'5;;-g:g-g t~~'Q) ~ ~~.=~{/J ~~·;;~Z~~ .', . ."m, <'"Elm:= Clb,jf~I:;-"'i:I"CI'\::s\I-; = cu"'o...9\~'oc..o.-.CI ,~Ift 0:5 l:100b G,) o.d ¡ Y =..c:: ~o~ ~"O:: cu~ ....~ ~ ';".--{', CU aStIJ:~r... ~(IJ...n:r~~O'~~-øu.:;¡o~......">.o Y"êoN~~'ClCJ It) U} Ct::IE-4_ = :t::~._-=......ø::.... Y.... a,) u "~~ ~ Jt,>ti ~"' '~cP_.-t:~ f'~'~~~¡':¡,'~<t-;'#"'-... ~d·_I,.".,,'-'~>¡., ",. 1"' ..;: ..-'\ ,~,.....--, < ~ '";.'~' ~5 ....f.... ' '.1i#i'';::-¿,~"Æ' '"'1'.....'.. g U} . -', ".("'J<.>. ," ~ . .' <' -~. l' , .)-.~' .:, "''t.--:I ~ ~.wa;.":.. 'f;j ."':~ - ~c:r:: ~'o.... :::". Ir- I.·... ,~ t'~',~'" ~r_",+ ;~ ffi:a,)rš ~~'[l._':;'j_ì '(I) ...~,.. .. 'f . ,__ .::~5!':i:~,"~t" ~~~·~-':;;I~~;:~{~~~~.;~ ;~~-t ,{.è-[~··;~··;~']Š~~,(~~~~,: ";.'~;';!<~'! . ~,~ ~~ ~",; ::i";'~. " \, è;~' ..:'7. "'i--,'k:-.1I"~·")!' ""'$>!".;ti'/W-.J',t'1':S"T ;,¡'~ ~1,,-'f.:;:~r.J,·I'Úi: ~1'~t ~'::: ,....~ ::'.",.,'~~ <; , "" ,', "~ ..... ..l....);'~t,':{1i',~p'J>--.~~ >.~....,";'::.~'''å=·¡8;}:'··1, "";:"-áQ,l-~ 'c ,'-; ,(.' . ..... WI' " eeI.d '" -0 eel CI"'~" ¡;;¡.. ). 'St: '"CI 0'" n 0.0 0 , ....d' <u - ~.- - .... '" 0 cw '- . CI Ct::I "~;¥ '.S~cu:;~=ë;:~-~~}Q..2:·~:'·!~?"·§roCl-ug..~,f.S.:;'ð=""·E\"': ,[ 8:; . ::;~.....o~.~ t .2~~ 'C# "0 Q,I:i : >i"l b~ S '"œ7" '4' [;1':= d as::: - -; ---, ~ ~ St: St: ~ G,).~ S· ':, -g t:: .... ::; CI '0 t: : ~ ã;.S-;:: Ct' ~ ¡,<!a,) Q) S'~ ~;;, ~ C $:'~; ~(" >~ :t:: ~t;¡:.~ ::s ~.a,) ã .9 ,g :a 8 :~ II: 0.3:, CIS Q,I ~"'S.2 ¡ ~ ::; .S ~ Q) ~ 'c....'"CI:=Ct::I~. ~'1r:=t",·oc(·-'.-0·Q=..!'0".<.~8s::=~8þ" oy"'S.""OCI~·J-oêâ § t:::'"CI¡:Q=..... ;. ~!"'" :< Y ::s 1-0 t:::' Q,I' = ~ ~ _ Q,I"-J m Q as '-... 'aO 21 'aO Q,I St: 0 ::::10._ ..:¡:¡ ~ Q) Q) 0..... ::; ... ~ g.... Q,I.... ....c ~ a,).Q) - ~,....-,II;~:t:: : -" ~ -. c ~~: .~ _ 1-0 b Q).s CI.S U o:=.c U 'Y ~ ca cu... ~:= ,cw Y ~ Y 0 = = 15 .."Z::: .....--... cw.... U - eel....· i'" '~......~. '>- ::S.- Y ~ eel..... ClI""\ <U = 4) a,)' :t::... ::s = 0 ._ CI Y Q,I 0 .. ~ ~._. ~of.Ef-;. 'i)>'.d1::~:'-.:;Þ"C¡,~C)fo""i::!u·Cla,)<u....·-ti..c.a::~'.~"Orn u.~ c;-Q):>..8'-Y::'"CI--- ..~ -1l4 Q,::S':.Q,I:;Uo~~o<",,:,,"'...CJ§;;;;<U4).!:It..c::Q,lgQ,l..~....:-=t) 8-2J·-2::s-:::- ....Q,I"Os::Q) . ~'~~~ ~.....3....c3~~ b~j( Q)..;¿t' 0:Et) Q) ã ~ ct°~::::; ã:i ~ ~ :;cg- ~ 2 s·:;·=~ ~ ~ o.c::¡~.;-g ~ =] "C ,,1:10§ ;';:~Q)~.tIJ: :;=......ç' "'I ~ e:::o >.b.O"g =.~ 8 Q,I.d<~ = Ct::I" >~'o:; d > 8 ~~..a::s Q,liif,--z;ø=¡ Š 8 .. I Q) l:: ï::: b .d.':.: == 1l4.d =', _, CD ë -'1a,) CI.c.CI = 'C Y a,) b.O::: ~ 0 ~ ::s' CD ë l::, Q,I f tIl) g..... 0.0 0" > ~ CI := Ct::I .__"'~ >.ca·~""2·¡¡'''O ~..~V~~. :s Orn_!=':t::-~ë; d ~ ::S.= ~;o¡ 0 2:'\~c:r:: 0..... 8"; ~ S Q,I C Q,I-8'>'- ~ = ~ ,m- êj <U "0 Q'.3 C ø- =~, C :¡j'':"4 = o.~ ~ ._-~ !:I S 8 Ct::I !:I 0.... ~ ,:. >\:= 0 ' Q) Q) o"O:¡j. ä'.... Q,I:9....·ü f , . \ ~ Q,I ¡:Q C ....'i... Q,I ':'" ~ ..." t¡. CD eel' B ..... E-4 b;:: ~,...." :3..... '-, !:I ..;;¡ bI e ó '. ca = '0, - ~ 1:10" Y Q,I..d a...'~ 1-0 = _ 0 b.O , f - ::s.... C .... .....- ~ (¡ > Y C .- - g C"O g Ct::I "'r""" ~ y·- 0. = .." ¡:::¡, b.O::I.o;J a,) 0.... ~ 0 .=- ~"gooQ)<u~cuCt::l2~~o~'o~~~Q,lQ)00Cle::sJo~~:;Þo~ 8.dS=8;::0a>.d.d~~'" " = _ :u......Q ~_,~ ~ ~.~,~:-,:"'r.~::'a ~:Q) U..... A ,~, ~ 8 ~ t2 !I' ~,~ - ~ ~~ ~-;., ~ ~ g.'Š - ~ = :t::._.Q Y ... E-4 11) ~ < c. '_ :~ .:.-1' ~... ;::._ ~~ .. '5~ .{:r-¡: "i ;,~'~ .:":: _2;-· -: .'~ ,.1 .- 1': :,l'. :~:' e... ~ b . .- _'. '~II!:J!; . t-~, " . £Ø. tJ {/J .'U) '. . ~. ~'"'" :/)j·....."..",'.ti_ ";! è;;.'~_., ';;'. ';.,"-, ..,,::~>:~.;\ "- ,.,......, ..!II: , Q,I,-,\ ""'-'.'~CI:"~-~.CI"'S::s,~, ,__ '. .~, - ,~,~..:_, "Q) :......'1 2l"OCt::I...!. ï:::'"CI··:;·Q,l6..,.::'-o,'"CI....··=::s.~.CI--..·:~··.ir. f to a· CI_:",:.=_ ....O.d , , .....' = Y Q) CI!... .I-o'~- 1-0'1:10 .;_: Q)·O.....' o........U ~-:'-'~..;¡-.:-:' ' tJ Q) - Q) =.cu'::. -b.O'" \ '.....~ - . 4)~~ Q, ·o.0r-5 O'd~.-'C_""="....CI:,....-: '..~-'[I.." " "C Q,I.c e 0 ::S"-'CI' s:: Q,I'"CI . C..' . - .Ë .3,'0' ~ Q,I "C 21 Q,I s::. ...~:".~' Q, ï::: Ø) :a ::s,: Q,I'~ .~ ;g cJ. '¡.(~~...Q;.' ftS ,._. ~.... IO~, 0. ..... C' ~ Q) ;'-... ·a;::: .... ~. ,,', 0...... 1-0-5-4) Y.~.-.¡, .. <U¡=.-4"Oü.->..C'·.... ::s=\,:,:;z'!-.,....<,~ <U"O~ '0 a,).<u Q,lQ,I.:2: CI-,= L '(â!" ~ S.~~]A.9"~=~··~ ;·~d,:,·S~å·~·:,~t3:ái ,~,~..;;):.=::::,:::.'" _f ;~-~i~:~š:.'~;~'.':.~.-å.; ~ f~ " "-- ~ . ... Q,I, 0._ = ~ ~tú ~_,\_,f, ~.~ >;;:;]A f ~.-;::.~~ 0" .~~ :¡:r,' -..-.-:/ .... -; ti f -8 ,0 ...;.-30 ~.::: .... en ~ 1,' ......_ . ." 'õ ~t;'õ s =Q,I-'..c::·~;iôQ¡-:::_'!::-·,,· ··_a,)ai·d Q,I-..d~·-~_·:-f'.!!<I· S.~ a,);:',Q) b.O" U tJ Uc.d:.= ~ 0 ", . """" .'- "....,'....' - - -, ¡;;¡, Y ........ '....' -_ "'--, ~... ..... 1-0 Q) = ,'"'.... ,'- , ~, "~,. :'. .,~.d -~Q,I .3.."..,,= _,4). ,,!.- s:: ::f::s a... "0 "!:('...!II:.Q i::! 1-0.-4-,.; -Q,,= _.: = ~ :t::.., ._ .....f..,;;. b.O" =.i.J 0.. ~ " .". '¡". ...-"t:SU'· ,:::u;,...-" Q,I_~;::::s(¡;.;¡ Q)',,:;._' :.,~ ow·Ct::I_·Q,lCO ~ .......d~ f' :>. -·'b? ~~~~'~.,~ ¡ ~ .~1~.3 g'. '~'.~-' ~ ~:5. g :~r:9, ~:,~~~:'.~..;~~'ã:':~:~~. ~] ~.]-":5, ¡ ~-,~ "E'~ ; ~ i'"ë t . .'.. ·.~¡¡~,·J,)a.1=::&1;)'I-o'.~:·~ eõ Q,I=blB·L.ò·~ ~,::S::3 ~:'ü'cce ''':'__ C:_,~ = ~~ëQ,l ~';~'c.~rn 8 ~: .. ~Q,I. ~:8·~_0::;;_°ti~0=CI~Q,I'O...~w::s~~..~Clt-~... i..Q ~",,;0.;1;CI,d.l0 tI.O,1.ã;oG,)~8 ~ III,.. .,Þ: ._,g.ù!::~,~CI._.~_Q)=!;:,CO_"OO _ .-::::::S..iN.._..,>::Þot. ==o"~a...~!'tIOQ)-,,ii" , _ '-. .,1'-Q,I >._=_- ~"I-o_'" <Uï::'" 1-0 >.::s ::s-o A_ ....- - u'ü 1-0 S::'"CI ;>....~ 1-0 .... Ut: J.. __ ..~..!3_ '~;f.d;::: = Q,I uj~~,g (1,)-,= :;~':l o...! ~S 0 o',¿U:;ð CD'._, g 0 I-o~~ 0 CI = 6:3 g iV::s 2 0 (i'..... !:::::~ ~;:,r.,.,,9 \.0:3 s:: ....:;~ ¡¡o; ~ 0.-» u Q,I.s . y..". >._ >...... ~ en c.:t ... ~ ~ = " C) = ¡:Q Y > .....'01%4 Q,Ø-.. ~, -... ....._" '+GÞ'Q)",Q)(þ,Q)-Q)~ C)._......Q)~~...._""".~. "1-. ¡;;¡d' .' ~ .... u~ 1:"~':.CI·''"5''N...:=:t:::;::¡;;¡ ë;'=Q)C)·....8ec2ë3>.~ a.-CD ...., eo~· . 1". ~... >.u ..··.:tt),'.-';E O,ï::'Oï::~ .....c.¡;=2!~ 0 O=·~ Q.c ca 0:::: ~ . 1;. .......c::!! >b.O:?:: y8,otI::0 ° c.o.Ct::loo.._._~.....o> .-... m u=.... ~. ." -_.- "" ._~. --------_._~--- Audiences will applaud top entertainment acts this summer at the Universal Amphitheater in Chula Vista. Construction underway on 20,OOO-seat amphitheater WOrld-renowned entertainers in the summer of 1997. will be spotlighted in Chula Universal Concerts, Inc. is a subsid- Vista on the stage of the new iary of Universal, ¡ne., one of the world's $15 million, 20,000-seat Universal Am- largest entertainment companies with phitheater starting this spring. Now more than $7 billion in annual revenues. under construction, a gala grand open- It owns and operates the Universal ing is expected in June 1998 to kick-off Amphitheater in Los Angeles; Fiddler's the outdoor theater season. Green, Denver; Starplex Amphitheater, Located on Otay Valley Road ap- Dallas; Lakewood Amphitheater, proximately two miles east of I-80S, the Atlanta; The Gorge, George, Wash.; and amphitheater will have 10,000 penna- the Molson Amphitheater, Toronto, nent seats, additional seating for 10,000 Canada; and operates Blossom Music on the lawn and more than 6,000 park· Center in Cleveland, Ohio, and Red Rock ing spaces. This will be San Diego in Denver. County's only outdoor amphitheater Besides the concerts scheduled by able to accommodate an audience of this Universal, major regional groups have size. The 72.5·acre site is next to White Water Canyon water park which opened Continuedinside,centcrpa11el --. . '.- Resident input sought on city's major areas for improvement The Chula Vista City Council is seeking the Broadway Busmes~ A~sociation to imp.Æ community input on its proposed top ment a focused revitalIZation effort along . . . seven major areas for improvement for the commercial corridor, city. The Council also isaskmg residents if there · Higher Education Center/Environmental Sci- are other major issues which should be added, ences Institute: Continue to plan for a major, some that should be removed or any that need smgle campus with emphasis m high technol-. . .,. to be expanded. ogy, biotechnology, environmental r€search ~,~ commerce. . <,_?,~~ Q How were the areas for improvanel\t · SR·I25: Support construction to serve tha ~W; identified? em area from 1-905 m Otay Mesa and traver ...·t. The CityCounciJ !wId a series.ofwork- north to SR-54.>.x· shops, andr~eìved inPUt fro¡n l1,U!JletOus ~. Improve City Revenue Base: increaSE! reVlm~~¡' groups and mdividuals. Alist 01 226 staff base for basic services and lobby to "return·\,.~'¡¡ proj~ts was narrowed toa.pproldmately 63 f01\ds taken from tha state. . ¡'if goals that the CityCounciJ r~ognizedas having Q What are the City Council's additiål1al tha highest priority for completion and from proposed priorities? ..:, those the top seven were identified, . Promote quality of life mdicators md!l(j,;; Q What are the top seven major areas for mg air quality, fiscal, police, fire/EMS,":., improvement? schools, library, parks and r~reation, ~11i: . Bayfront. Continue visitor-servmg com- sewer, drainage, traffic and higher ed¡¡ça..: " metcial/r~reational redevelopment of · Insure long-term financial stability;';:;.: thacoa.stal properti€s west of 1"5 between SR- · Promote ~onomic development; . . >':G:~ 54 and L Street. · Evaluate and assess land use and pl~t . Otay Valley: Expand the opportunities created · Promote and influence regional issues; ~¡!i!1c by theallto park, Universal Amrhitheater and · Update administrative policies and p . White Water Canyon water par ,and improve How can residel1.ts participate? the area's image. Q The City Council is encouragin.g your' . Third Av- el1.lIe: Work What are your ideas? Would you lilœ Wormation? Reach the city m any of. . with the Down.- following ways: town Business · Leave a voicemail: 409-5800 Association to · Call the Mayor or Council: 691-5044 re-establish · Fax: 585-5612 down.town. as · On-line at tha city's web page: the city's com- http:/ /www.cLchula-vista.ca.us mercial/ civic · E-mail: lvignapial1.0@ci.chula-vista.ca.u...... focus. · Send a letter: 276 Fourth Avenue, ChulaY¡" . Broadway: CA 91910"": Coordmate with · Attend the public hearing: 6 p.m., Jan. 13,¡"f Council Chambers. .A; J.'i'l~ i..J .~ . " - !1,. ,. ---- " " , , \ ." " I'; , ,j :é ¡¡\ G1 ..~ -- ~.'--" .. , _.'-'----._-~{ ~I >,< --_.--------- _-=c~-.,=c_,·, ---0":'====---" ..._~-.-, ''-''>o~ I . ! I City wins awards an approved electric or natuff Chula Vista is the only city that vehicle retrofit. received two Grand Prizes in the Businesses that have local deliv- 1997 California Cities Helen ery vehicles or residents with short I Putnam Awards for Excellence routes are the prime candidates. from the League of California City staff will work with appli. I Cities. Announced at the League's cants to find area retrofitters, which annual meeting in San Francisco, Recycle holiday trees! will expedite the procedures. For ! the city was recognized for: information or an application, call . The Chula Vista Human Ser- Chula Vista residents can the city's Environmental Resource vices Council, which has recycle holiday trees again this Manager at 691-5296. generated numerous action- year. Remove all tinsel, decora- Calendar of events oriented projects including tions, metal or plastic stand, and, Project CARE, the Youth Coali- i! possible, cut into four-foot · Second Annual Bird Fest- tion, Citizen's Adversity lengths. Curbside participants Jan.30--Feb.1,426-2882 Support Team (CAST), and a should place the tree at the curb · Chula Vista Expo '98-April4 school-based collaborative. on the regular trash/recycling · Free tours on tall ship "Califor- . The CO2 Reduction Plan, with its day. nian"-March 28-29, April 4 innovative environmental pro- Chula Vista aparbnent and . grams including the telecenter, condominium residents may drop , ';,', , ' '''ry, zero-emission vehicle support, trees off on Jan. 10 from 9 a.m. to 1 ,< Of"~ electric vehicle rebates, COJ p.m. in the parking lot adjacent to . ,- educational curriculum an the Fire Station at 447 F St. Free building incentive programs. compost will be available at the event. For more information, and I Every drop counts! details about a possible east Chula Residents with curbside service Vista drop-off location, contact can recycle used motor oil and Pacific Waste Services (Laidlaw), filters for free on at 421-9400, or the city's conserva- /i' their regular trash tion coordinator, 691-5122. - . $ day by scheduling Coverupr -- with Pacific Waste Businesses offered Services (Laidlaw), vehicle rebates Trash can lids, which help to RECYCLE 421-9400, two days Local businesses and residents prevent litter and pest problems, USED OIL in advance. To also keep trash dry. Since almost - only have three more months to locate the nearest free used oil 50 percent of costs are based on drop-off center in Chula Vista or participate in the City of Chula weight, trash rates can be kept Vista's Smogbuster Vehicle Rebate to report a storm drain violation program, for up to $4,000 towards lower by using lids-especially contact 1-800-237-2583, a program ~ during the rainy season. Replace· funded by the California Inte- ment lids are available at many grated Waste Management Board. retail stores throughout Chula Vista. III ----..----.-- n_ _.___ __._.......__n__ During Super Bowl week, . , the 1998 Global Junior Mexico, Europe to play CJu¡mpionship football game will feature a rematch t championship here of teams from Mexico and I ( Europe in Chula Vista. "- The Global Junior Championship II, Darren Bennett, an American-rules football game San Diego Chargers featuring the European Junior All- All·Pro Punter, is the Star Team vs. the Mexican Junior All-Star Honorary Chairman. Team (ages 16-19), will be played on Jan. 23, 7 Prior to the game, Bennett and other pro football p.m., at Devore Stadium, Southwestern College in players will sign autographs. Chula Vista. It is an official Super Bowl XXXII and Tickets, priced at $7 for adults and $5 for stu- Super Bowl '98 Host Committee event. Last year's dents and children, are on sale at the Visitor game was won 30-6 by Mexico. Information Center, 750 E St. . Bay-Delta program critical to local water supplies Since 1995, a group of technical experts has water for more than four million acres of the been working to find a solution to environ- world's most productive farmland, which, for mental and water management problems example, produce 45 percent of the nation's fruits related to the Bay-Delta, an intricate web of water- and vegetables. Some 120 species of fish and wild- ways created at the junction of the San Francisco life are found in the Bay-Delta, some found Bay and the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers. nowhere else on the planet. Ultimately, CALFED representatives come from a variety California's trillion·dollar economy, the seventh of state and federal agencies as well as a federally largest in the world, is at risk if we cannot find a chartered public advisory committee. Under a solution to the problems of the Bay-Delta. mandate from Governor Pete Wilson and the CALFED has recently completed a series of Clinton Administration, the group has undertaken public hearings in order to find a preferred alter· the process of reviewing alternative plans for native for a Bay·Delta solution. Add your voice to solving the crisis of the Bay-Delta, which is today those heard at the meetings: call 916·657·2666 to I' C in serious trouble. Habitats are declining, and speak to program staff, or visit the website at some of the species native to the Bay-Delta are http://calfed.ca.gov. listed as endangered. Water quality has suffered, To learn more about the Bay·Delta's relation- and water supply reliability has significantly ship to the imported water which supplies 90 declined. Many levees are weakened and in dan- percent of San Diego County's water needs, con· ger of breaking. tact the public information offices at Sweetwater The Bay-Delta supplies drinking water for Authority, 422·8395 ext. 608, or the Otay Water more than 22 million Californians and irrigation District, 670-2254. . .. -. ---...-------'.---------,- I I Weather forecasters are predicting a wette: than n,o:mal I winter in Southern California because of EI Nlño condlflOns. I Prepare for winter storms DO you know what to do in case of a severe win- - I ter storm or flooding? Since weather experts are predicting that San Diego County ":111 have I heavy rains this winter as a result of EI Nmo cond¡- I tions, preparation is especially important. I The City of Chula Vista has taken a number of steps to help prevent erosion and flooding. Recently, city ! crews have cleaned out storm drains and grates, filled sandbags, sandbagged areas that accumubte silt, trimmed trees, checked all emergency eqUIpment and conducted staff training. In addition, during the past 10 years the city has from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday through Friday. Sand- I spent more than $13 million on erosion control and bags also are available at a number of local I flood channel improvements because some areas he businesses. within a floodplain. To report non-emergency problems or actual I Wherever residents live or travel, it is important to storm damage/flooding during office hours, residents I be aware of the dangers of winter storms and be pre- may call 691·5027. To report storm damage on eve- I pared. For valuable tips, read the free "Be Winter nings and weekends, call 691-5151. Remember that Wise!" brochure, available in all city buildings or from the 911 emergency phone system should be used only Chula Vista's Disaster Preparedness Office by calling for life-threatening emergencies. 476-5338. If conditions result in any road closures or flooded If residents anticipate a flooding/erosion problem areas, residents may get information from local TV on their property, they may pick up 10 free filled and radio stations, including 1610-AM. . sandbags at the city's Public Works Yard, 707 F St., Th "(hula V'sta Quarterly" newsletter is published four times per year and is distributed as a public service to residents and businesses by the City of Ch:!a Vista. ¿opies are also available at various locations around the cÜy, or (all 691-5296 to be added to the "Quarterly" mal¡~ng hs~, PublicatIOn costs are ---- funded by the City 0/ Chula Vista, with contributions from Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water !Aslrie,1. Send comment, or.mqUl.nesto Jen Gulbransen, Public Information Coordinator, City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula VIsta, CA 91910. The crty s web page add!!'» IS www.cr.chula-v\sta.ca.us ~\ ft.. -n- ~- -~ CITY OF CHULA VISTA U~\ji)~~U.) Sffi¡.~/íf~': )~~~~Hill ~"~i'" Mà~' êltjr iii.';; @Printed on Recycled Paper .......~ ¡"hn1J. GQei) ATTACHMENT D ~ .g ~ - ~ ~ 00 u ~ IZI Q) Q) ~ 00 ~ 00 Q) = ~~ § ~ ~~ ~~ ~ u oo~ ~ 00 oo~ oo~·~ ~o ~= '" <= '" "'""0 ~ :::..Q ~ ::: :::-:::..Q ro ~ .c= ro'-' P'< ro ro.g ro'-' ¡:>... 0 -00 e~ <= e e~ e~ <= :r:: ~ 0...... Cd 0 0_ 0_ Cd ~ .... ~'" e ~ ~~ ~'" e 0 = -~............ ...... -~ - ~ ~ .~.~.~.~ '~i .~.~.~ ~ _ 000 0 0 0 - 0 ~ U e:. U U U .;;: U e:. U ~ ¡:>... "-' .... - U 00 . .. 00 Z .... - . r./J .......~ >. o ~ .~ ro '" .... c/5."'. c/5 ~.S ~ § ~ ~ U 2~ a...¡ ~::: Õ. ~ ~ ~ § ....... c,¡ \0 0_ ",' "':> ro OCl) 0 E-i ~ '" .,s ¡:Q .- J:> '",,,, § .¡::! ¡:>... ç ¡:>::: Z ¡¡:: '" ..ê~ 0.2 7ii~ 0 ,3~J3 0", ~ ~ d .¡:Q §U '";,¡:>... Z ,;::~~ d g 00 'i 8 Cl)Q 8'" . .........::: 'i~ ~ ~ p, 0 d i:J 0 .§ ~ d '" .... p, ~ 1:1 0 ¡::: $:J ::s = Cd cIj ¡::¡ d I lfì = .- 0 N i:dO N~ 0 cIjQ)~ ~o ~ E-o N _ .....U - - .....u¡:>::: ",U = ;;;J ...;¡ U ~ U .... .-. > ~ - ~ ~ ...... ("f') "d" 0 ~ ~Qì r- ;;.: ...... ...... r- N 00 ~:ë ;.: 0 ;.: ;.: -: ;.: - I) )~ 0 Zoo :> 0 '-' =:: Z >; Z Z Z Z ð ... ~ >: CI:I .;;.; . ~ ~ ro '1:1 IZI Cd . 00 . - ..... ""0 ~ !3 ""0 ::: !3 ::: ~ "" ._ ;:; ..Q ._ 0..Q 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '-' :.a ~ oo?-:-- p, ~ .~ æ ::s 0 :u § õ !â 0 ""0 '" ~ ¡:>::: - õ~.¡!J [;; - ._ .. 0 .... '" 0 '" ::.:: :¡; ¡:>::: '" ",'- ¡:Q ã U .- .... ~ e = '" .¡::!.¡¡;.....- '" - tn 00 ~ p.. ti) ~ .- § .- .... § 0 .- J:> :> CI) :>""-'<::: :> 1iJ ro ;g {'Ij "'d;::..s cd ....... ~ 'S 3 ]~'S 3 § ..Q 0 ..Q :><,.. 0 ..Q U U ¡:Q U ;:;>0 ¡:Q U ... <I) - {¡ - .~ ~ '" . ;. <I) '" "t¡j <I) ...."0 '" ç: 0 ç: .... - 0 .... 0: - .... <I) 0 ~ "0 0 Q) ;;::: g- O ç: 0 OJ)OJ)U :::E ¡:l., ç: ÄZ :::E '" ç: 9 ;>, 0 ¡¡J·S 0 í3 ¡¡J ¡¡J t ¡¡J ¡¡J 0 :::E<I)UO .E .E ::I: .E .E ....::I:ì:<g¡ .~ 'ü .... 'ü .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § 0 § "0 '" 9 ¡;. 9 ='''':::E''O 0 0 :::E 0 0 ¡:QO,-,¡¡J U U U U ..; .-"i i) .... '" - t;; i:i -¡;¡ 2 C ::I: ¡:l., <I) '" '" ¡¡J~ ç: .D.... ..... ;>, <I) o <I) '" <I) § .S 0: ;>, Z ....¡ <I) M 11 .~ <I) .... o 0: OJ)~ '" "0.... 1;; "0_ ....¡ <I)'" .... Z~ - <I) , ~~ ç:..g ¡:Q . ¡:Q 0 o_ S S S °U S s ~ 0 Z .; cd.s~ .; .; 0 P.. 0 o_u 0'" ¡¡J 0 0 0 0 0 O\~~ ~ M M ~ 0 00 ..... - '" - - - \0 '" M U - - u <I) U 0\ 0\ ¡¡J <I) 0 <I) 0 0 ¡¡J ¡¡J ~ "Ó .; .; ~ ~ .; <I) ð <I) .¿ ....; ] ~ ,2 .... ~ ~ f-< <I) U U -¡;¡ o<:!~ 0 0: u ....._ 0 '" 0 '" '" o ç: ê '" « ''ª '" <I) « < ~ 0 '" OJ) '" '" <I) '" 1j 4-< .... t)Q)U <I) OJ) <I) ;. '" 0: .~ 0 ç: .~ '" 0 .... ~ 0.= '" =' ..g 4-<2 ..sCIS =' ¡:Q U ¡:Q U¡g þ o ç: ='~<+-< ~ '" <I) o ~ <r: f 00 .~ 1~ i)U ",0_ o;!:::: cd 0 "0: :> ~ ¡¡J ~ <I) c.;:: ~.~ --g S~ 'ü ~ :E 0 ~ð - § '" 4-< 0 .... 0 0"<:: 0 0 ¡:l.,0¡:l., ¡:Q 0 UU :>Z - - - -~---~_.~.._..,_...._,._-,..._."-_.._- ~ ~ E-< U -< E-< Z o u 00 z o .. ... 01J E-< ::: -< '5 01J~ N " ::: ::: - ~ ~~ z ü " " -< .- " " ~ ~ aa ~ ~ ~- ~ A ~ .- o ~] g§ = .~ ~O Z §~ ~U -< -..D a~ 00 ..; "'d ( J .~ ~ ~~ üU -., cIj ._ d ( J 00 ... ;>" 0 to o '38 a ""d" ¡:¡:: ::: ~ 0 ::: a ~ ='" ~""d oj'.¡:i bl) A ( J ~ ~ ( J ~ .S .::: ç q:: 1: ~ q:: q:: .D ¡:: q:: ~ ~.....- ( J 0 ( J ( J a æ ( J ::c ~ ( ) ~ ...... .~ ~ ...... ...... ( J r./J ..- E-< E ,::: ~" ""d to " " ;> ~ " OJ) ..... ~ r.n r.n êf ~ o. ~ o ~o 8", $ ¡:¡ '" '" ZE ~'" ,.D+-> ~oo - c:! 00 IZ) .....-1:1.:I ro r.IJ ~ ( ) 0.. ¡::¡ ( ) S ( J ~ A :::s ( J '"ª ~ 0 a g,9 a.~ E '+< \C 0 E >~ dB ~ ( ) B >3 ~~ r.nB ...... ro 0 ""-I IJ:¡ cIj ...... "' 1:\S( )"'d '';:::(1) ~m d ( J ~QJ ;;::=tf') dIU d d ro r.fJ ~ ~ 0 r.fJ ~ r.fJ _ ...... ( J r.fJ o 1; oj .-::: 8 '" ~ :::..c: ::: ",. E::: '.¡:i..c:- üO ~'>- '" 0 UO ¡;¡::: 00 cIj cd 0 0.. ( J A A Cd A a +-' .~ {fJ {J'.j ~ _;... 00 ~ 00 ( ) ~ :.. 00 "';"" r.n ( J .----. W ( ) 0 ( J t-; ¡;;;> ( J ( Jd2 «;... cd""S 0 ( J ..; ;... ~bOd ;... ..; -~ro 0 ~~ Z bJ)O ..Do 08° 20 SOE §Z ~U ' ~Z -u='z ~~.~ IZ cd U r.fJ ( ) ~ "'2 .~ cd ( ) ~ r.fJ r.fJ ( ) ( J -S "";;",, tf dO( ) ..... ~ _ ~"'" 0 0 > -::I - to - .- .... ;> '" U '"'-I '"'-I ~ "'" [/J . . . .. . . . ____~____~__..___ ~._.._m COMMENTS FROM COMMUNITY PRESENT A nONS General Comments from meetings: Has the Council had any thoughts of moving the Civic Center east? Seniors don't have a need for growth, they like Chula Vista as a small town City needs a vision Recreation Comments: Complaints about closure of Parkway Pool and warm up Lorna Verde Pool Should not be giving $500,000 to YMCA for pool, need to spend it on city pools Ballpark Comments: If it works, great. Is the City serious? Has the City looked at the problems related to traffic congestion? Padres should pay for the full cost of the ballpark. BaytTont Comments: Bayfront uses could include a college on the bay instead of a ballpark. Is there any recreation planned for the Bayfront? SR 125 Comments: There are bigger problems with 905 which should be dealt with before 125. General problems related to traffic in the eastern areas. You're Doing Great/Thank You's: Libraries. Senior Center. Street Sweeping. ATTACHMENT E I Mark Lovewove, 03:32 PM 11/6/199, Kudos and sr-12S I Return-Path: marklovegrove@home.com Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 15:32:47 -0800 From: Mark Lovegrove < marklovegrove@home.com> Reply-To: marklovegrove@home.com Organization: @Home Network To: lvignapiano@cLchula-vista.ca.us Subject: Kudos and sr-125 For Chula Vista city council; First of all, the Chula Vista city council is doing a great job. Especially when compared with some other cities in this county. From the trash collection issues to the long shot attempt to get the "Chula Vista Padres", (don't give up on that, anything could happen as long as san diego is a mess). You all have performed with great integrity and foresight. Thank you. I'm glad to see sr-125 on the priorities list. I don't have to tell you how important that is to support several other of our priorities. What is the latest timeline for construction? Does anyone know? I would support any attempt to speed things up, and would appreciate news along those lines. Once again thanks and keep charging! Mark Lovegrove 576 Douglas St. C.V. CA 91910 619482-5582 marklovegrove@home.com I Printed for Louie Vignapiano < lvignapiano@ci.chula-vista.ca.... 1 I .'. _.-,--..---- ---~---- I Steve Wood, 01:46 PM 11/14/19, Top Goals I Return-Path: swood@Comps.COM From: Steve Wood <swood@Comps.COM> To: "'lvignapiano@cLchula-vista.ca.us'" < lvignapiano@ci.chula-vista.ca.us> Subject: Top Goals Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 13:46:53 -0800 The absolute number one goal for the City SHOULD BE to update/modernize/expand the storm sewer system in preparation for El Nino. There are huge inadequacies that need to be addressed quickly. Steve Wood swood@comps.com I Printed for Louie Vi2Wlpiano <lvÍ ~napiano@ci.chula-vista.ca.... 1 I .~--"_.'"-"-_._. I Mark Love2rove, 04:28 PM 11/21/19, Kudos and sr-125 I Return-Path: marklovegrove@home.com Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 16:28:18 -0800 From: Mark Lovegrove < marklovegrove@home.com> Reply-To: marklovegrove@home.com Organization: @Home Network To: lvignapiano@ci.chula-vista.ca.us, "jmoot@ci.chula-vista.ca.us" <jmoot@ci.chula-vista.ca.us>, "jrindone@ci.chula-vista.ca.us" <jrindone@ci.chula-vista.ca.us>, "msalas@ci.chula-vista.ca.us" < msalas@ci.chula-vista.ca.us> , "shorton@ci.chula-vista.ca.us" < shorton@ci.chula-vista.ca.us> , "spadilla@ci.chula-vista.ca.us" < spadilla@ci.chula-vista.ca.us> Subject: Kudos and sr-125 Representative, You have performed with great integrity and foresight. THANK YOU. Glad to see SR-125 on the PRIORITIES LIST. Traffic jams on 805 north represent bad growth. ADVERTISE SR-125 AS RESONSIBLE GROWTH! What is the latest timeline for construction? Does anyone know? I would support any attempt to SPEED THINGS UP, and would appreciate news along those lines. and GET the "CHULA VISTA PADRES". Anything could happen as long as SAN DIEGO IS A MESS!. CHULA VISTA PADRES SOUNDS COOL! MOVE ON THIS ISSUE! ! Any questions, Contact me. or DRIVE 805 NORTH SOME MORNING. Keep charging! Mark Lovegrove 576 Douglas St. C.V. CA 91910 Home 619 482-5582 FAX 619 482-6699 Email marklovegrove@home.com I Printed for Louie Vi2Wlpiano <lvignapiano@ci.chuIa-vista.ca.... 1 I ___ _ ~.___m,,_____....__,__ I FOXEKO@aol.com, 10:26 PM 11/21/19, Padres Ball Park I Return-Path: FOXEKO@ao1.com Received: from mrin84.mai1.ao1.com (mrin84.mx.ao1.com [198.81.19.194]) by en 1. connectnet. com (8.8.8/CONNECTnet-4.0/NORELAY+THROTILE) with ESMTP id TAA17856 for <chulavis@connectnet.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 199719:26:51-0800 (pST) From: FOXEKO@ao1.com Received: (from root@localhost) by mrin84.mai1.ao1.com (8.8.5/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id WAA15 142 for chulavis@connectnet.com; Fri, 21 Noy 199722:26:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 199722:26:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: < 971121222628_718233390@mrin84.mai1.ao1.com> To: chulavis Subject: Padres Ball Park Status: We do not need, or want, that ball park in Chula Vista. All it will do is bring congestion & noise. For Pete's sake use the land for a larger public park and quit thinking in "revenue" and "prestige" terms. I Printed for Louie Vianapiano < chulavis@connectnet.com> 1 I ATTACHMENT F Transcribed 11/13/97 1. I just want to say that I think it's disgraceful that anybody doesn't just love Chula vista. We moved here from the Los Angeles area; we love it here. The policemen are polite, the library is lovely, and the whole city is lovely. We have a beautiful bayfront. You're doing a good job. Don't let a few people bitching stop you from completing your projects. Thank you. Bye, bye. 2. Hi. I was really amazed that the City's top goals are market the Third Avenue downtown area. You might mention that you've raised the fines on the parking meters here.... . parking meters...you jury-rigged them up so you don't even get a full hour there with your money. And there's nothing downtown. You might also mention that the shops all close about 5:00. The only thing that's open is the bars and the theater down there and Max's 99¢ store, so really you don't have a great deal to promote. In revitalizing Broadway's commercial corridor, I think you already revitalized it down there next to courtney's Tire. That lot's been sitting there vacant now for two years. You people have got to be out of your mind to buy this kind of property and hope somebody is going to come in and develop it in that neighborhood. I wouldn't be caught walking down there after dark let alone going down their shopping. You people have got your priorities wrong. Give the police a pay raise and stay out of the commercial business. We have realtors that will do that. Shirley ought to know that. You developed downtown Third Avenue here what 10-15 years ago and tore all those business out. Now we've got the Plaza there on the corner which are four buildings in there now that's occupied. the rest of them are all vacant. So there again was another big blunder. so, I don't know. Then when you fly into Chula vista you don't see Chula vista down there written in stone you see EastLake. You could change that and at least acknowledge Chula vista's on the map. Okay, bye. 3. Yes. I've read the priorities and I think they're absolutely ridiculous. This City needs a heck of a lot more than developing the waterfront area or the Otay Valley or revitalizing Third Avenue. We need police protection. We need public safety to know that our citizens and anybody coming into this city is safe. And, that is something this city lacks. You continue to build. I don't know what you're doing with the revenue that you're receiving, but it certainly is not going into public safety. The only thing out of your priorities that makes any sense to me is cleaning up Broadway. But as far as Third Avenue, if I didn't live here I wouldn't come here to shop if I knew the truth about the public safety issues. And I think the other thing is the Park Avenue pool. We have elderly people -- citizens that pay taxes and contribute to this city. That should be a priority -- taking care of what is currently existing and seeing that the people of this city who put every one of you in office are safe. Thank you very much. 4. Yes, I'd like to give my opinion regarding your seven priorities. I've read them, and what it says to me is there is a total lack of consideration for the citizens of this city. When the honorable Mayor took this position, I think her focus was redevelopment, and it has continued with a total disregard for the citizens of this community. I have watched the Council meetings that are televised. I find it absolutely appalling when citizens come before the Mayor and the council to see how they are patronized. You ask for the people of the city to come to you, and yet when you do you do nothing more than patronize them. I find it absolutely sickening. I watched the program or the meeting with Mr. Schulman who said the train left the station. I personally attended the council meeting with the POA and officers of this community. Again, you know, I can't help remembering what Mr. Schulman said...the train left the station. I guess my question is to myself certainly not to the Councilmembers and the Mayor because I don't intend to be patronized by anyone in this city, why do you bother asking? Why do you bother asking the people of this city for an opinion? The community has needs. The people have needs. We have people living in this city living on streets that are so severely full of potholes you can't safely drive your vehicle up and down them. We have senior citizens that need a swimming pool and you close the doors. We have an unprotected city. We have a 30-40% less reaction time on emergency vehicles than any other city. You know, I guess what it's going to have to take is for one of these incidents to personally affect you people that sit on the Council before you get up and do something about it. I am so sick of the redevelopment as are many of the people of this community. We have needs. We want those needs met. For you to pour money into the waterfront/Broadway...it is absolutely ludicrous, ludicrous when we have people that need things. It will be interesting to see when all of you come up for re-election; I can guarantee not one of you will have my vote. I want to see the needs of this city met, not the needs of egos that sit on that Council. These are ridiculous priorities. You need to take care of the city workers. You want opinions, ask them. They deal with the public. They have the public calling them all the time. They are under- paid as are the Firefighters and the Police Officers. Protect our streets. See that we get emergency vehicles in a timely manner. Take care of the senior citizens; help the schools. We don't need the waterfront developed. We don't need anymore bulldozers coming in here. Same thing about Ms. Horton meeting with Larry Lucchino. I thought it was ridiculous. I've since spoken to them. Chula vista is the last place they would consider, and it's primarily because of the traffic control and police protection. So you need to hear what the citizens have to say people. What you're doing is ruining this city. The decent people want to get out of here, and when the people in these new developments that are paying these high taxes find out what kind of police protection and emergency protection they have, they're going to be up in arms and they deserve to be because you have done a disservice to the people of this community. Thank you very much...that is my opinion. 5. Yes, I'm calling in regard to the article on the seven priorities of the city. Nowhere on that article did I see anything about police and fire protection. I mean the city is getting bigger and bigger every day and the services are getting smaller and smaller every day. You guys are amazing. I watched on the news with the police...the big rally they had and you guys turning down their contract, but that doesn't seem to be a priority with you. I'm sure they will take that into account when we vote for you. Thank you. H:\HOME\ADUIN\OAWN\PHONE.CC John A. Willett ATTACHMENT G Vice-Chair, Planning Commission en Montebello Street Chula Vista, CA. 91910 January 5, 1998 Mr. John Goss, City Manager City of Chula Vista 276 4th A venue Chula Vista, CA. 91910 Subj: Chula Vista's Top Seven "Enhancement" Priorities, dated November 12, 1997: Review comments Dear Mr. Goss, 1. CONCERN. There appears to be a lack of percieved public interest with respect to discussions on attracting new businesses or developments to Chula Vista. East of I-80S, where the quality of life is good, crime is down, good schools, recreational parks etc., residents state "it doesn't impact us, so why bother". "Montgomery Area" residents state; "Streets are lacking curbs and sidewalks, schools need repairs, parks lacking and this is the way its going to be, so why bother". 2. UNDERSTANDING. Many residents question why so much effort is placed on the expenditure of city funds to attract new business, which increases traffic, impacts schools and public services. A need exists to erase this concept by developing a better understanding with residents that: a. New businesses support residents ability to procure a better quality of commodities and serv- ices to reach a higher quality of life. b. New businesses provide the opportunity for residents to work in newer and higher grade businesses to sustain a better quality of life. c. City will be able to procure from new businesses commodities and services in order to sup- port requirements. d. City will be able to acquire new revenue (sales, transient occupancy property, utility user tax and State motor vehicle-in-lieu tax) to fund administrative functions, support, operate, maintain and repair infrastructure requirements. e. City will be able to acquire increased revenue from redevelopment districts, assessment dis- tricts, transit, sewer, etc., to payoff advances or indebtedness issued. 3. RECOMMENDATION: Assign an individual council person to interact with Community Groups / Areas and City Commissions / Committees. 4. BAYFRONT: Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce letter dated September 30, 1997, (Drafted by this writer) concurred with the Port of San Diego's Concept Plan for Chula Vista's Bayfront, multi- faceted land use allocation, environmental conservation, public parks and commercial recreation use. To insure long-tenn economic viability of Chula Vista Yacht Harbor / Bayfront, the plan must be aggress- ively pursued. Public access to the Bayfront and other waterfront amenities must be maintained. a. The City needs to pursue the development of a Hotel/Motel on Marina Way with a capacity of 350 - 400 people, including a conference facility to handle 600 people, to provide accommodations for visitors to businesses and recreational facilities. Currently the City is unable to attract convention type activities and large social events because adequate facilities are lacking. 1 5. THIRD A VENUE - DOWNTOWN: There is a question in many minds, is the goal of re-establish- ing . ':Downtown 3rd A venue" as the commercial-civic focus of the city realistic? The proposed additIon of a large commercial office building on the vacant property on the east side of 3rd avenue between G and H street, by its self will not do it. There is a lacking of business diversity in the area from E to H Street to attract repeat customers. The city has spent large sums of money for new parking areas, but it did not bring more people to the area, some activities are operating on a day-to-day basis. A personnel observation, many of the current store operators between E street and south to G Street, lack a real interest in keeping the side walks in front of their stores swept, trash picked up, windows cleaned etc. The vacant lot at the south-east corner of E Street and 3rd A venue is an eyesore and should be cleaned up. 6. BROADWAY REVITALIZATION: Although the corridor was recently re-identified as from "C" to Main Street. Emphasis for the last 5-6 years, championed by the Broadway Association has been from Broadway south from "H" to Main Street The area north of "j-f' Street does not have such an organ- ization. Revitalization of "C" Street to "H" Street should be given the same effort as that was given to "H" Street south to Main Street. North Broadway can be considered a "Gateway" to Chula Vista from National City, but contains many blighting influences which could be cleaned up if the proper incentive and recognition is given. 7. OTAY VALLEY: The City should take aggressive action to obtain better highway signage. Unless Caltrans eases restrictions of advertising signage on I-80S, businesses success on Otay Valley Road, will have to depend on traffic to the White Water Canyon water pa¡X and the Universal Aphitheator. 8. HIGHER EDUCATION CENTER I ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES INSITUTE; Higher educational facilities attract new businesses and residents. Is there not a misconception in the title? The Center will include the Insitute as a part of the overall complex. The concept of an "Higher Education Facility" is highly supported as there are sufficient numbers of stu-dents to support the center. More effort should be given to publicizing the concept locally and the regional area. 9. STATE ROUTE SOUTH (SR-I25): The City needs to become more involved in the Caltrans Horseshoe Bend alignment (northern section of SR-I25) mitigation process, in the Sunnyside I San Miguel area. Preserve South Bay, a private group receiving funding from Southwest Center for Bio- logical Resources based in Tucson, AZ and the local area, is preparing legal procedures based on environmental issues to stop the project There is no Chula Vista representation on the CaItrans mitiga- tion committee. a. SR-125 Justification: The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) population growth forecasts, indicate the San Diego region will contain nearly four million people in 2015, an in- crease of 1.5 million, or 60 percent more than the 1990 population. Jobs and housing are estimated to increase at even faster rate, with a large portion of the projected growth is expected to occur in the South Bay. In addition, a SANDAG economic study, concluded that, without SR-125 South, the South Bay Communities (Chula Vista and East Otay Mesa) would forgo the opportunity of further de- velopment of residential, commercial, and industrial areas occwring east of I-80S in Chula Vista and OtayMesa 10. IMPROVE CITY REVENUE BASE: As previously stated, the general public needs to be come more infonned on lobbying efforts to "return" funds I increase sales tax "retWll" funding. The public should be advised as to results of the sub-paragraphs statements, generated by Council Action. Pro- gress towards improvement of the City's long tenn financial stability should be mandatory Department Standard Operating Procedures. II. ADDITIONAL COUNCIL PRIORITY GOALS: a. Insure Long Term Financial Stability: Sub-paragraphs 1 thru 3, should collectively be the responsibility and accountability of each of the City Managers, Directors and Supervisors in establish- ing, implementing and performing cost effectiveness evaluations to insure contribution to the City's long tenn financial stability. Accountability standards should be if not already set forth in the City's operating procedures, be established by council action. 2 12. Prorrwte Economic Development. Sub-paragraph's; 1). unless land exists next to a recognized golf course, an attraction such as the proposed "Ball Park" or the Olympic Training Center, action is almost fruitless. 2). Reviewing franchise's and agreements on a periodic basis should be standard procedures. 3). IDEC, WERC and BECA abbreviations should be spelled out, the general public just passes these over. 4). The Joint Corporate Yard concept has been in the talking stage for many years, still no work- able plans have been generated to the concurrence of all those activities which would be involved. 13. Prorrwte Quality of life Indicators. What is needed is "feed-back" as to what action has been taken. As this sub-paragraph was extracted from the Growth Management & Ove",ight Committee Report as presented to and accepted by the Council, no additional comments are made. This writer was a member of that group. 14. Evaluate and Assess Land Use and Planning: 1) Sub-paragraph A. Although the "plans land use" processing is technically correct, there should be a more business-friendly method developed in approaching this procedure. An example, is the action took by Oceanside in the development of their 24-point action plan. 2) Sub-paragraph 2A and B , should be a continuing and on-going process. 3) Sub-paragraph (4), Over come by events, McMillin is moving dirt on the land purchased. 15. Update AdmÙústrative Polices and Procedmes; Sub-paragraphs 1. & 2. according to the state- ments should have been completed prior to July 1, 1997. What happened? Sub-paragraph 3, has this been submitted for review by the Council? Sub-paragraphs 3,4 & 6, has staff(s) submitted recomen- dations relative to the request set by Council? 16. Prorrwte and Influence Regional Issues: Concur with the stated recommendations for the City to maintain a presence, especially to take a more active participation. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the City's Top Seven "Enhancement" Priorities. If addit- ional clarification is desired, please call me at 420-1607. Respectfully, ~~h~ ohn Willett dc Mr. Chris Salomone, Director of Community Development Mr. Ken Lee, Acting Director of Planning Mr. John lippitt, Director of Public Works Mr. Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing Mr. Jess Valenszuela, Director of Parks and Recreation Ms. Patty Davis, Chair, Planning Commission Mr. Rod Davis, Executive Director, Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce Ms. Dawn Herring, Budget Manager 3 ~"'_._--.__._.'..._-'._-- . i : rJ h:--1:-'-J~;-~---::- To: all Council Members .....:~----,~-- -._ __ ___ !,.r., f'ri; _ "_IJ 9 ii, . ' I L j' From: Viviane Marquez ~(:;;:;';'-'c---J "/ ~""~' ;"t. ,. : " ,: ',r r ' ~~~~e~~~~,A¿~n~~91O C'li i ',;:,' ii' 476-1040 About Chula Vista's priorities.... I was temporarily encouraged when I read that the council was going to solicit additional input from the citizens regarding the council's priorities. The input from the commissions appeared especially apropos since these are generally concerned and interested citizens who have a stake in the decisions that are made for them. Therefore, I was highly disappointed when I realized that what was being requested from the commissions was to rank the seven already determined priorities, quite different from asking what the priorities should be in the first place. I noticed in the Star News that the priorities were rephrased so that four of them would not start with ...continue redevelopment...., unfortunately that does not change the fact that this is the jist of the first four. When will the Council realize that the Redevelopment Agency is a HUGE fiscal catastrophe .... the debt it has amassed should be an indication that it's just not working. I would like the Council to pay more attention to enhancing what is already developed (which is the intended purpose of redevelopment agencies) and less to building in areas that are not. I'm glad to see the SD Union discussing the "high-tech" education center as opposed to the previously stated "environmental-biotech" university since it has been made clear to me that the very compatible environmental portion of this university was not appropriately looked into and an environmental university was not at all in the plans- in fact I would like to see an accounting of the $10,000 funding received from The California Department of Fish and Game to look into the environmental aspect of this proposed university. Supporting construction of SR 125 should absolutely be removed from the list of priorities. The only City of Chula Vista commission that reviewed SR 125 supported the no build alternative, this is not something the citizens of Chula Vista (minus future developers) have expressed any interest in. It is per mile the most environmentally damaging freeway ever proposed in San Diego County and it will devastate the ambiance of a very unique community. If you look back at the comments from the Resource Conservation Commission on this issue you will see that almost without exception, these are the exact same comments submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a short time later. We did not fabricate our comments from thin air, these are serious and valid concerns. The impetus for extension of SR 905 is building at a surprising speed and is what this region really needs- a way to get people to 805 and 5. Chula Vista should not spend a nickel including staff time on promoting this private TOLL freeway let alone make it one of their top 7 goals!!! You want a goal? support SR 905! Improving the city's revenue base should be changed to improving the city's reserve base. My understanding is that the 4 million dollar debt of the Chula Vista Nature Center is included in the paltry 5 million dollars in "reserves". The debt will likely get higher rather than lower anytime soon and can certainly not be counted on as a reserve. Please quit counting on increasing revenues (a fonn of taxes any way you look at it) and start considering fiscal responsibility (ie. spend less than you make). In general the list of priorities reads like a "keep doing the same old things" list. Some alternative suggestions follow. · Actively support the Formation of the South Bay National Wildlife Refuge · Finalize the MSCP and City of Chula Vista Subarea Plan to preserve something in this town for future generations · Increase maintenance of our existing natural open space areas before they are so degraded that tens of thousands of dollars need to be spent to restore them · Quit dependence on one time development fees · Increase attention to potential for ecotourism · Get more citizen input and base council decisions on citizen input · Put questionaire in city newsletter (and/or have a dedicated phone answering machine for input and have input distributed to council on a biweekly schedule) about important issues- and find out what the people -- -- - --~^-,. "-~""'--""-'--"'~'- who don't have time (or are not paid) to make it to meetings are thinking . Keep in mind that an increase in 1,000 jobs does nothing when you are allowing the increase of 10,000 residents. Work towards making the lives better of the people who live here now, rather than continuing to work on getting more people here. Thank you for the opportunity to be heard. Sincerely, ,1fv?£Vti- )1fcv'fð P.S. Responses may also be sent to vmarquez@cts.com ŒC' Q::twn l-b"ri()9 C-r\¡ I.-{Wìú!j¿;r- December 18, 1997 Mayor Shirley Horton City Council Members City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Horton and Council Members: In response to the letter of November 12, 1997, from John Goss- Ci ty Manager, the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) has input and concerns with regard to the seven priority projects being considered by the City Council. The GMOC's concerns are not necessarily with the specific project priorities, however, they do relate to the anticipated impact of additional priorities being placed on city department staff that are already burdened by a dramatic increase in workload. That increase is largely attributable to development activity in the City's eastern area. On November 6, 1997, Planning Department staff presented growth forecasts, and an overview of active planning work efforts to the GMOC (please see attached outline) . These major planning programs represent a significant portion of City staff's workload, and a number of them are directly related to growth management planning, and to ensuring ongoing compliance with growth management threshold standards. The Multiple Species Conservation Program, the Parks Master Plan, Schools Policy Issues, State Route 125 Implementation/ Major Project traffic studies, Orange Avenue Financing and Improvement Plans are just a few examples of significant projects currently undertaken by staff. Considering current policy, program and infrastructure projects, in addition to the increase in residential, commercial, and industrial development activity, increased workload for Planning, Engineering (traffic) , Parks, Fire, and Police Departments are of legitimate concern. Specifically, the GMOC's concern is that staff will be unable to absorb the additional workload associated with the proposed seven priority projects, without shifting time away from current projects, which could potentially jeopardize progress on work efforts associated with growth management issues. -- --- ---..---..-... -_.~-- __n__ _ ______________.___._..'""'.___ I would be happy to meet and respond to any questions that you have regarding GMOC's concerns. I look forward to attending the next community forum regarding Council priorities. S~y /-t...iL~ Tris bar, GMOC Chairman Attachment c: John Goss, City Manager Ken Lee, Acting Planning Director Duane Bazzel, Acting Assistant Planning Director Ed Batchelder, Senior planner GMOC members H\HOME\PLANNING\EDALIA\GMOC\HUBLTR.CC -- ~.,--_._-,._---------_.._--~~------ ".---.-- GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION NOVEMBER 6, 1997 - AGENDA ITEM NO.2 "MAJOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPlv1ENT PROJECTS OVERVIEW" - PRESENTATION OUTLINE - I. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS - Rancho Del Rey - San Miguel Ranch - Bonita Meadows - Rolling Hills Ranch - Watson Land Company - Eastlake Greens, Trails, Land Swap and Eastlake III - Otay Ranch - SPA One (Otay Ranch Company / McMillin) - SPA One West (Otay Ranch Company) - Future McMillin - Future GDP/SPA (Otay Ranch Company / Others) - Sunbow - Bayfront II. MAJOR PLANNING PROGRAMS - Parks Master Plan (Parks Implementation Plan) - Greenbelt Master Plan - Otay Valley Regional Park - Multiple Species Conservation Program/Otay Ranch Preserve - San Diego National Wildlife Refuge (Otay/Sweetwater, Vernal Pools, So. SD Bay) - University (Higher Education Center, Environmental Sciences Institute) - Southwest Redevelopment Plan - Broadway and Third Ave. Revitalization - Lower Sweetwater Study Area III. POLICY / REGULATION - SANDAG Series 9 Forecasts / Land Use Distribution Element - C02 Reduction Plan (Air Quality Improvement Plans) - Schools Policy Issues - Development Phasing Policy - Industrial Lands Policy - Housing Element Law / Affordable Housing IV. INFRASTRUCTURE / FUNDING - Public Facilities DIF Update (Library M.P., Fire Station M.P.) - Orange Ave. Financing and Improvement Plans - SR125 Implementation / Major Project Traffic Studies - Otay Landfill Re-Permitting (H:\.1-iOME\PLANNING\GMOC\MJR·PROJ.OUï) -- --~,.,., -_..._.__.~ - .-.-.-~-----.--.--".- ATTACHMENT H -- T .. d.... "'" "" ""',dt t, 'H.', oomm..", t..."... proposed top seven major areas forlmprovementforthe dty. The Coundl also Is asking residents if there are other major Issues which should be added, some that should be removed or any that need to be expanded. How were the areas for improvement identified? The CltyCoundl held a series of workshops, and received Input from numerous groups and Individuals. A list of 226 staff projects was narrowed to approximately 63 goals that the CltyCoundl recognized as having the highest priority for completion and from those the top seven were identified. What are the top seven major areas forimprovement? · Bayfront: Continue visitor-serving commercial/recreational redevelopment of the coastal properties west of 1-5 between SR-54 and L Street. . Otay Valley: Expand the opportunities created by the auto park, Universal Amphitheater and White Water Canyon water park, and Improve the area's Image. · Third Avenue: Work with the Downtown Business Association to re-establish downtown as the dtýs commerdal/dvic focus. · Broadway: Coordinate with the Broadway Business Assodation to Implement a focused revitalization effort along this commerdal corridor. · Higher Education Center/Environmental Sdences Institute: Continue to plan for a major, single campus with emphasis in high technology, biotechnology, environmental research and commerce. · SR-125: Support construction to serve the eastern area from 1-905 in Otay Mesa and traversing north to SR-54. · Improve City Revenue Base: Increase revenue base for basic services and lobby to "return" funds taken from the state. What are the City Council's additional proposed priorities? · Promote quality of life Indicators including air quality, fiscal, police, fire/EMS, schools, library, parks and recreation, water, sewer, drainage, traffic and higher education; · Insure long-term finandal stability; · Promote economic development; · Evaluate and assess land use and planning; · Promote and influence regional issues; and · Update administrative polides and procedures. How can residents participate? The City Coundl Is encouraging your input. What are your ideas? Would you like more Information? Reach the dty in any of the following ways: · Leave a voicemall: 409-5800 · Call the Mayor or Coundl: 691-5044 · Fax: 585-5612 · On-line at the dtýs web page: http://www.d.chula-vista.ca.us · E-mail: lvignaplano@d.chula-vista.ca.us · Send a letter: 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 · Attend the public hearing: 6 p.m., Jan. 13, Coundl Chambers. """ ð/j 14 Hilltop Court Chu1a Vista, 91911 January 13, !r,9S-:--;---¡iñ-"-I\- City Council I 0 ~ L' ¡") " c ' , ' , 1---- -- - 276 Fourth Ave. II n Chula Vista, Calif . ¡i,I, tMNI3'~ IUU'- Subject: Proposed Priorities, 1 d & 1 . L-_____--.J an use p ann19g C;I!T:'!:_ c¡-;[r,::S , C;".': : \;:~--:r'¡_ ',:þ. ¡ Gentlemen: I want to address the issue of developer fees and affordable housing. Developers would have you believe that low cost housing is in jeopardy if development fees remain in place. Let's look at my neighborhood, Hilltop Court, a quiet and centrally located neighborhood of 3 bedroom, 2 bath homes. Though we are in the latter part of the decade, not one of these homes has even come close to keeping up with the inflation rate the last several years. These homes which feature hardwood floors and some with swimming pools are selling for about $130,000. Developers are building and will soon offer for sale much larger brand new homes in Chula Vista starting in the low $l40's. That's in spite of the cost of installing infrastructure and the payment of all fees and a handsome profit to boot. The Governor wants to reduce the threshold for school bonding from two thirds to a mere majority. This would unfairly impact people like myself with noone else in the household. You know that it is in the new developments where the influx of school children will corne from. Otay Mesa will pose huge costs on education and social services and will drain a whole lot more water from Sweetwater's limited supplies. Make these people pay some of the freight, whether through developer fees or other charges. Affordable housing is not out of sight; come to Hilltop Court. Let's all pay our way. Thank you for sOliciting resident participation. Sincerely yours, ftFa-J) £~~~ "' David S. Hanna 1/13/98 --------- - ~-_. ._m__. --.-------- ",f ~~ \3 1 «('1'¿: ~ , .--1 , , "'~ 2 3 November 1997 / // {" Honorable Mayor Horton ¡ !~'" Chula Vista City Council " This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation ofthe all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. µ() ?;/~11. _ Very Sincerely: ffO/l{~ ---- . K ~ . AId£¿ d t.?~.L~igned . . . ~. ~-~ / --~ ,{--_..~ . ! I ~ : ! ~ / 7)e l c? ) ./lc;lI / IY Ö Print name / ¡-----.. \, : ,.. " '~.' '---'-- J .-..-- ----.--.,"-.---------...-,. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who uSe Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design uSe for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .-- ' . !¿ Signed '- -r , Print name . .' - Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very smaIl part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ Signed Address CY. CA· ")1"))0 - - - ------- ------- -- ---_..---~-----_._. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: a~T~/? Signed ß- I-J; fl11 ~:nrname ...--r- i) ¡,/( " - ------ ~_._._._.._-_.. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. ------...-".---..------ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers. or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: {~ r!jµ¡j Signed 'f(fr¡'i: 7Aí A¿ Print name Address !ðD/Vf[A I CA· 71C,Od- ---~-_.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~. ,f: ~igned £/¡,(') r )f/.I1q,¡h1:.m name ChLl(a (/¡'-s7á I rA November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed -l1ò7' S AJ-EW ¿ L/ Print name November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation ofthe stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: r K~/i'"'" \11 YJ ì ~z ¡I ¡.¿. e \ \ -{ '1 Print name November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who uSe Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: iýJ/lJllJf!2~_ f0)ffJ/IJ.f1/t:YJ9'Jn (1.tuy Print name Address .~ ---------~---------_.,.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceotable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: kL~ ~gned ~......,~~¿;¿;"U\ Print name /- November 1997 I Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 97ry O¡i.-Qft, Sigo'd /1/ It TV lJ / ~rint name j . J~ .' ~ C¡..ktLjf V í"f:../If. cVI- Address I. Cf/9/ () November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .~~ ::T~",:, ~ Signed kc¡ ~...ICo Tqlof:fI1l..1vc:. Print name November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~~ Signed _~m ~U CLrdPrint name . Address - ---_._---~------~-~~._-~-"---- ." ---"_...._~--"..--- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ Signed WÇr~V Print name _Address - - -- - ..- ~ "--'~' --.-.".,- ",-,-"'-'-' November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed .-------- ,.-.- V ~IJar Print name 11/0 t_ Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: /)1///1) :;: /.h ("-~rf'</¡/;tJrint name . Address --- -- -"""" LÁ./ //\_ ~ t" I ( )-:t. Î (1 (0 November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~~/ ';"00 :J 6fffltV' ()J :3!1/It¡/~Ý . . Pnnt name - Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~~ig",d f\~ F\I'\Y\ \-\ex--Y\a.tìdebrint name Address t, ~~ \j\ ':h,. (k\- q \" \ò ~________ ___u_ __n....__ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 1ffh~ Si,.,d 1Zri ÅJeÁjJMr Print name ~Address __...~___."n·_._u,~..__ -------- - ______________m November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ;; SffJrP Signed ;feu ef /5(' , ( Print name . _._~..._- ---..-.. m _........_...__....__.....___..______ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: O~º~O Signed ÁJ..J ~ ~ tJ;¿J'hoj1.þ Print name Cvvt...o J¡~~\ cl~ "")L9(o November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed Print name Address . ._.W. .~_.______ .....__.._ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: j)~J ¿ ~ed ( ~nt name Address -~~-_.- . - ..__.._--~-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceotable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ôfeuy1g QMT~:;d Hc7Ze/ Cq~f¡/ /6 . Pnnt name November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, wil\ not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who uSe Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very smaIl part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design uSe for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Q~µ; /~ Owgn~ Is /f-~ t- L 1m L fI~ V ¡L/þ z- nnt name November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceotable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~~. -. ~-~~-=-~~Signed y~.¿ ¿, «.. C;. G,«-l \ Print name - -. .-... -- . ......- :011o___. Address e,",,>--\.<>- \j ì ~ CÇt. 9./ ?! 0 ö-..\ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Ak Î{ ftJ,"'t Signed ])e.-hrn K. Ki nn '2-y Print name Address ---~-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: (XkrJ~~ Signed C h ~ cJ) oct_ rh..aprint name -.,,' ~ -~~.._-- -----------..--- , November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: rJ"i=c{ St,"", -Jø(J: 11 Do" ¡; ('oLPrint name _Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Signed &nr-lro. I (:r hÚf/){Li') Print name ddress --- ------..- ---_._~------- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design uSe for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: /dr cU Signed 17fµ( Mw.N¿, Print name I t ,~ Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceotable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: aV g . / ~ Signed -------- C/2/3/C- -L$ßf t { Print name ~ Address Cv CIl c¡ 10//0 November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chu1a Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: i £fJ. ~ Signed 1/ ¿&I(/v t). I; L-L J.SIA ( Print name .....-.. Address .-..-. ~. - --"--...---.---.,,".--,..,-..-.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ·h..,,"¡t' ,.-t, J/M"1j('"' M .F-/tfy ~ Print name r Address (,""~J(q Vp~o J ..---- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: _é Signed ( ,...... J.> I Print name , Address - - ..--"-.----...-.-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: , I ¡r \ V V' \ '\",., . Signed . \ . . i t .. ,. . t' , ;".* Print name " ~ . 4' - ,I > ~ t - --- ._- ------~---_._--_._...._-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ßJi-¡ ~J:( S;goed { 6~ C- \~ i1'K- Print name ----~._-- - -~._-~-----_._"-_._.__._-_._- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: }"~w &w;Z¿ Signed NOr fY\Q, C1\nter" Print name Address -_..._-~ ------.-.-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chu1a Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: J~]\A ~Sig"" 9a11î HCcI~ Print name ddress November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~éS~d2I Signed ~I "^~ pvdwl LL Print name Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation ofthe all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: V1t~~ Signed fVìw+hv.- /-e j ú ~p ( Print name - --------...-- .---...--....."...-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation ofthe stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 0(d; ¡;;;,,/ ci~-?JrLSigned . ¿k' /117 An,) . ~./ef·.¡oyPrint name Address (l~ j/,sh; ,~ . 7/1/cJ , L---£l November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ^ µ, -- ( {:ä'C,- ¿, . Oyz[Z-( ?(:"& Signed /-J I", ("(,/,' ("~I) f)·cn~j Print name Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ,(~'. ¿¿T<£ 1r¡j:eiL(( f( ¡~kCSígned [L<-//1:} f' (AlI(, ~()lIlre r<l.A>rint name ddress _.__.~- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: £¿H Signed .-..- LI/Z II .JU¡Jù7'- Print name Address u-J.L LA 'Ρ'liC - ---~~_..__.. ..'.___'0-_" November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: c ~~4)Signed 0(tíìMrX I~ 0ûYlciYn L. KOMi (p 1Print name Address -...-......-.----- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ? ~Signed /" ./"/ßc.- ~J- Print name ~ Address ch'w ~ 0fÚ a '7/7/) - .--.-.. --~.__._------_..._- -----"-~~- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: JUða,.,)~ Signed SlL ,CiliA G em t Print name ------.-_..--- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: j; 1) 1/ ~ I 'ftJ~ :5.'/-,- Signed '?/U).h I - Fe eSÚf?ú-·:T ( Print name .......-. Address e~(/(~ CÁ Crl7rO November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: l1Imùc i)A(X ~()-' Signed C· TI(1Vß /0 ( 'a Print name ~,V· Q/Ofl/ -~--_._.....-------.- --,.,...--.----.-.----- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: -# ( Iltff= Signed fJlA/\ If ill r. I/£GI} Print name r, Address ----.-.......-.---- 'u__ _...__.-__. ----.- - ---- .-----.'-.--.-..------.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Ø-e...,' < ~u(,Si""d ÅÙCh Þ ¿¡'~¿./-li}~ S- Print name Address .__a___ ___._^.._...___ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: C '" Pi ~~Si,"" ¿¡ (! Qt> 0 «Aint name Address - ------..---..------------------- -.-- _._--_._~---- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 5"1J2.1>'\ ~ÑUEÙ" <) Signed ~1J11~ ~ f" µUE(J\ ') Print name Address -.---.--...- --- "" - -, -----~ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~~~/ Signed ~C;lí-e.- (' j á cJ e 2... Print name ~ Address _ ___ _____~m.._·____"m _.___._~ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~~~ Signed 6l.o~IA ~ ,c.l.-A H0~ Print name - ^ . . CV, O(Í{ CJICJ¡o Address -------.- ---~--- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job. and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed H Ú-J""Cð À. (; v .{. "'^ ~ Print name Address -."----.."-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 'If # ffh 27-1}_";'''d Jx1 r1 J ~ 'j e' Q () i"141 It=>< Print name ddress - -~.._--_._._.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: {kw ~ Signed Print name .. . __._.....-....~.....y..~ ddress __n_ ___'0__ _____. -_.__.__.,.~--~._-~_._-_._.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. L Signed ~~ù,~~ ~c,JS,Ù . fl· Print name Address V ì<;.f14 C/t C¡ f¡ 1/ - , '" ._._._ '"'"~""',"'_'___U'_ _ ..' _ .__ ".._,._~_ ...___,.__,_.~_________.___.__. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: v-tá ,q- -- C-iAlòr Åned '"ThowttÚ C. . ¡.Jt>6 Ì) Print name Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who uSe Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other eVents in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design uSe for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: I ) /...Q\ L Lknr ~ed - \) \C' \J...., L lOC' 'v.-ejPrint name ddress November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: , ~"- a(D.~ Signed , L, So- 0,/1..... Print name (ÌI - .----...- -."---.".-----. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~p;;~ Signed YlMlu +JAø~r Print name Address __'______ ___on _______m November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed L~.-'Ct . Print name Address Œ..h vi ~ V¡J-., ~. -.-"- ~-'-'-----"-'-'-',". November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ [f /¡J aJ/IJWLf} Signed GU;~ Ho-m9/)(J Print name Address ~;-kA - - ---..------.-.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chu1a Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 41t~fl t? ¡:¿V~gned knt;-nn V\"(A£Of) Print name Address CIC/)C'Ý, Cð C¡'t110 - ..~ --- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: (~ð~Áj,~,Io.(2¿¡¡ (PAR f.-4 (~II:"J..t::"7....i;)G fH¿;J>fMdf'ame - Address -.--..-.-.----.,. __ __~."_______.._..._.._.___~__..___ _ _ _._._ _.·_.~'m November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceotable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~.o..i).lL Signed ~~"'~~ \~\.-s. ~ () fI ~ E. z... Print name Address .--.-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~r :J~ ( JQ r }(Yl.' ~< Signed R \ -\'(\, \ \ \ Y,\,\\.., \, \. Print name \ Address ..-...--..---- -...-...-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs. soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: >n~ ~ Signed ~1o(l;ÙJ _ 1 -!eí(]cr1de..7- Print name . Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~/ {.¿p '-??'¿..'$"¿¿~Q (t;--a..{~ Signed ,) / Á. Æ /¿/' /. '7 v?_ C' ¡:Z'e 1',., $ '- C{ n. I UPrint name ------ adress November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: G~~. Signed JJ fI..lnú ç.i 1'- C. ~ 'c, Print name Address C\.1."\o. \J:~\Q ('{ ctlqro - - -- _..__._.---~_._--_--._--- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ,;/ I' Lf- . ':.'..\ t'" 1 ~ Signed ." . ;, ( (J .' ") r Print name "--.-' " Address , , ------- --_._--.------ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~J/{rf~, ~J Signed lr:.lÎ("f!\- ~i/Jl Print name , ---- ddress ~ (IlL Ie, V, st ({ {cr ((/91 ¡: _____ u__ - _._~._._.~- "..-.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceotable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Wt:11[/ .. Signed .:/ . ;;< I (,,,{ ?A fT!./(A H 1-/(.:;:;1.117 Print name Address (¡fe Lp... C' \/7) CA 'Ì/LìIC , November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: /1 y _ Signed / y/Z-..."( (/2e/'/'~ ¡/ / ~e/ I. (;;J~ç /;(~ Print name // '-! Address tlÍ~r; ¿./Í5I~ (:::/ ý/ý/() - _..._.,._-~---~- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed Print name _ ^'_.".~________.._ _m__'~'_~___ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: j~~ ~. ¿,} Signed VI e, kVI~ -' A. ~_print name .~ . --,~-- __~~.....-r' ../, . "ress ~'D. c4 1~¡D3 .... ----.....-.- --..---- -"-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~1 ~~4)/tJ¥';""oo ~11 &nnDf':> - íJ tJòds Print name - Address ~\--\R (¡.~ ~lq02- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation ofthe all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: . Signed ¿Jtili~ ¡: tJðJoij Print name ....... ~Address ~n;~ crr 1/1b?...... _..."---._-_...~------ --- .---,-----..- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: /) Yf~ (Lff ,""t5c; Signed 'j( ì) (Jf.,11~ J f'?f CÆ ¡/.4-7l//) Print name \ ' / /0/ &1 1/?JD November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: , . '-~ lINe h"-- ( L'~ I , . ---. .. ~ ) nit fl' c- Print name Address . ._...._._-----_._--~---~_..- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ,~ VcYlQlJ1Qo ~æ~ri2 Signed CO~fLO ~Ob~\~LJU Print name ~Address q I U i<'; ---""---- - ,-------...-... November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ --1 ~,\.,i Signed 1 b¡j) D 1A.fAt Print name _ Address ~\¡\--J ¡\C\, C"", 11"\ \)J.. - - .-.-_.._._~-_..._"---"-~-_..- --....---- - .-.".--..-,. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and an those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: A'~~ Signed /lJ tel/1'1Et [) ØÆ/?1. Print name Address (j ¡j. '1'¡q¡O - --_.- _______._ u November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: -i p41rve Signed \OX'~ ,~~(Å,\(\, Print name _ess ,-..._- __.__,"~n __ _" __.___..__. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .~~~ '-' Signed Q (. W\I? r ~ Print name ~ Address .------------ .' ",-----.-.-.--. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: r:'f!~t . g. -;h~ _ Signed \}\(J Iv\ I(A ~ o.~(q i_Print name Address eN (A q¡C(1() -------. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 4:f;t~~ . Signed ,? 1) t/YlD ~16veKD~ t . ..-.- v int name -----~~-- Address CV CA q \e¡ \ Ù - -~-_._.- --~._-_.......-,._--.._----_._--_. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us, Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ /J ~ð Signed CfI7' NC:V /j f-¡CUW./1 Print name Address CJ-ft<LPf VI ~/f, CIf C¡/?(C ____..__u ---~-_...,- .- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceotable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~/?-o ~Signed \J lÁ.-V\k.,.-,- :So h. ,^S 0 ~ Print name Address ------...---- - ....---.-.-.--""..-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: dU'vt~'~gned ÎÒ.mafGt /Vl as, {J).-- Print name Address ~'.._--._'..m__'_____. _____~,._~~__ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: . /2CJtädClf!Jgned vtJu4wfL l1t/issa f\Otddt fti¿rint name Address - --~---'--'~-'---'--- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chu1a Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~kf 9¡~' Signed ¿'So- L. 1õ"~ Sð", Print name Address (. ¡/. 11 'fli! - ------~ "---..-------..".---., November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: -~_.-_."-""'----. 7 fjJú-IIJI Print name / / ddress ---,-~-_..._." November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: o,tf!ü~ ¡~/}y1£þ?V Signed r f()f!1I~ ' í~J"fÎ"Qn Print name Address c.V. _".".~______m.._'__"___ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation ofthe all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~~ úJ;k Signed , SL.{ Sèt/¡ WI/e.'?, Print name Address ~ ¿/;3/a-- 11110 ---,-......--.------- -"",_._- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unaccentable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: I i ¡ I... l Signed fi,&J PM R-es!cknf ¡~?berrQ~ ) ß / ac h.xJè<l Print name Address ¡I~'¡' (,lqlO J - --,.--.-..- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ '/11 é< Signed ·~v /.J..-.<-. / . '-- CQr C~ ¿jl¡'~ 1vI. Print name I -..-......-.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very smaIl part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: . a~ / L,Q) ¡¡Po. v' UJ1 ~ Signed JfnGl ---r'G\.\OJ¿(tA- Print name ddress ~IÎ'-.- , cA ~I~ O -_.._----------~----~--_._..- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: &~- Mnt2pTf Signed C~ rk r2tøMtl 4> Print name Address ~ -----..---...--...'"-. -----_.--- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: (~ 't<A4~//ü4(<- (¿~Zt!~4 Signed l: V4J1/C¡;!IJ!/¡J. (;;;r/;n "co. Print name Address .-----.-----...-..---.---..,-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty. it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ¿~ J &)1&""".." fù 0 11 v¡ 12. J Q ((oev L Print name Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceotable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very ~incerely: ^ l~ Ull----- Signed I ~A I~ Print name -'--.'-' _..._._.._0__.._...__.._.._.__..._____ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed ~ \JrF·[Li) Print name _ddress November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of,the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~.~ .' ¡va.! ì / .. ~ YLsigned .~ Î\ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed Print name _"___ ____" UO.___ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed ~ÝÌ R1x~¡ Print name ~.. -~..~-----_.__.__._._..- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: n'..~ ~'l~ AK éL,. .'. " Signed ~ \ \j \ C~ \15ìx \7,") Print name Address C·\j . -- - - - ~ - ~.._-_.__.---_.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: }~ . fV\.r( ~ Signed ( '()...:-I_ ,,)C\Vi .Q {V\(MI<h¿t 1,1 Print name Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unaccentable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .~t\."" ~\.q/~lA Signed - -.:)~V\ jv \(¡1<V\()1/\J\ Print name -- ~ .-.....------ Ad. ess ------------ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: '/~?~Y/- Signed /J¡~1 C 0-~j¡;i Print name November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of·the stop signs at Woodhouse. Signed Print name - - - . - . 'ddress "-",.~..._-_.._---,- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceotable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: . i \ \ \ -~' ...> Signed é.' ... ~~,-.'I .Ä:¡-.;.:..une./cc...J \ Print name ---.........----- --~ Address c'--V 1l"'('cJ . . ._.~_..--_.._,---_._-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sinçerely: /' ,V Signed J Î,-^,Ú-\l,,-t.-L- !i1¡]\J.. ,-\...íf:::;6 '- " Print name ---- Address ~ - i IC') \ L! --- - ---- -- -_..--._._.~- ----- ~.__._----- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: W~ f!ddk Signed !.AlA j. íKIP fll¡ c. ;ItA Print name Address - - u"__._u . _._._.~__.,.~___ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs. soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed Address _.m__._.'_____ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design uSe for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of·the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ ~ Signed -Mo rvl- ~tuV~O?<î-Print name November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission . (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~c.<~ _~IDI41t-l1? R.v~ ' ~çrt;:0- ~ Print name November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ¡ ¿ J7tfJft I~ G 8igned (/!I,4 I+CoZ-CP¡-W,4/U>rint name ~ ___________ "_,__ _ _ __ __ __ __~__._.__..__u____._.__________·_·,~ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: . I' \ ¿~ )~'-- Signed C;;. ÙClf):Ç' r;c V'iÎe'it Print name Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job,. and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unaccentable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~~.~(~\~. Signed \> 'ì\uu. \OJ C W P(( EQ<;. Print name ----- - ~._ . ·ddress ,~_...,. .... ---_..~-_..~,_.._._-~-.._. --- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ "c:ct Signed ~"'-1- COLIN L 1",-7) Print name '-. (I..::: 1~ .--"" ----_._.,-~-----------_.....~. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~iN~~ Signed , 12ft '<' YI..L> c.- h c\"f\,.- Q.... Print name . -.------.-...---..------ . November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way, The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park, They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: J [L Jl~ Ónl.b( - ..' VI Lf..--e '(Signed L1J¡) 1-4 f) 14 . 11(' tI11 ~ M , 'ntname àJ~ eJrW~I-, \J,~ . LA G\IQlû November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .~ Q ~ r' / ¡ ~¿-~~£.P7¡j .' {(,[ ~ Signed D (j ~m()'Îd jj/)¡¡ Ú(!ÎLõ Print name L~\C{ ViS~, CiA. ~\L1I(J -- .---. _._"'--_.~_...._._-,_._" November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job~ and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed Print name -" _.~ -,-,~_..,~._--_.~--_. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: -L:Ì,-, r:' Signed ./ ¿g' , 1-- ¡¿ /I ¿. . 'LJ17 Print name Address ...--"...- ..---"--.---" November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chu1a Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us, Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job~ and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: J)~Y.&5< Signed ilíl1'I~1 l. 0C1((e.-,. Print name -,. i~___~ ~Address C "-0-(a lhtzt cA 1{?W I November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: V~tIA) k¿iÛ¿f/ Signed -þóyG{/1 &/ ie z- Print name CA~jc, ifs7/-¡ {.'¡/117/,:; / November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ( L .4~1 / // ./ .."'1A' Signed - ¿/ -be ~~ ~ úLz. ()-s Print name _ddress Uf\k ~ ~'---7~c- C¡ l S. l ~ _'·_0·._..________··. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: /, ( :kJdw,~ I _ . , {)Ÿ"))' /Y)'c.-.-lhl'lrj../~ Print name Address C~Jllh V, j 1 _.u......__.__._.___......_.___... _~__.. _._._. ___ n._____...__..__._______ .---- ..._._.~-- -.-".--..---- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way, The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ) " . .~ J -ð/'~¿?V'~ )J ).k.-v~ ROi-Í! /Y\VI (I'.¿ "~Y\ ~ Print name ......... Address --~---------,--~_._- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The neW stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who uSe Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design uSe for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: I~-' , n~I"VlJJ""iigned './1 ~(p...<-.. tt"'i,~ ; L ) '"' fh i/J Y P h I_Print name . - - ~----- Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed '-y; \-\-~ ßP-6fJ5,o 0 Print name ~s C l~\~ V ( ~:fq I \'~ C\ 11/ f November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: iZU~i :2~,~, 4 Signed ~ \\.I.. Of-1 ':::2.. ç;("..) ~<:!J¿ c.' Print name Address - -------~..._--._---_._- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ){~~ .¡J(5N~~C Signed . ~S ð"Vv--~, Print name Address ....__.."._._---~"._...__._-----_.._...- . November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed Print name "- ---,._,--,----~._._- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~~Aj10L~ Signed _~b~.1kld) Ù-e... Print name . Address ."----_.._._.__.__.._...__._---~-_.~--_.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Ûz7?(r~ Signed ~IA. <,/#J fl V trJ-1 ~ Print name Address ______..__...______."_._,__..._.___.. .....___.'"__.__..,_ ... m"__.""__ ~____. _".__-._________'_.'______. November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 73lif7~ Signed / J~rintname ~_. _ ~___,~,._._~_.~_..______'m____ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed Z- Print name ...... Address _ _ ..__..m_~m.·._.__..._._._.u..~_ _ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 0, [/ 9/ 910 ..~-_... _'.__0·' November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: L?{Þf7v-y- Signed r~IL r( M 1+ JZ a. u Z"L.. Print name Address - --.-- --....,. .....--.--.-.-......-...--".- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 5/¡~~~--- Signed Mat1L.1t2 I. e !jJf!.,a./lzPrint name ..."..__ ._.. "_ ·_.~___.__~~.__u·__._._~_~_ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chu1a Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .ßA/¡/~ ad Signed , (};Ul . lJl (/ V\ . (Ii; ¡<:'4~ Pnnt name - November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chu1a Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: , LML ~igned - /ffit1y C; !l/èa¿" . . '-Fnnt name CJ~~ w'5·fq. uA. C¡I11D } . _....-.-- '. ---- ----.......-- - - -- - --_.__._---~.._..._--_.._-_._- -- -- ---------..---- ._---~---~---~,--~_.__.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us, Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: //¿:'.1~ (:I~¿,¡ ,9~~L¢",.signed (h I) 16 ,/,';1(, Address - --_._--- .'--.-- -_._._-~-~-_.,--- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: IJ .' / - Signed )-If ;//~<--- '~'1 r- L ,/ cDvt' Print name _ddress --"--' --- ----.....--.- -- ~.._.__.__._-_._. .._._. __...____.·_·~__m~·'···____·____·+___ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: %~ Signed / !Át¡j fJlJtlL Print name .......,.. Address . _.~- ---~-.-_.._._._---- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Signed ~print name Address _________,_______"_n."' November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: DÀ'-I/D C 4A.Y;;;;'-?::- Print name Address November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: cP~~~ !sv:.cLigned ,.---~ F,cL Pri",M~ . Lilli ~ ~uJ C\ ~ \ "':J '\ "6 C f\Address ) 9 \1/6 .,... -.-.. ....---.-...-.-,.--.- ---- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: O·IP}<t. l'l/(} Signed -----Lf~e (a, M~ Print name ddress -----_..........".._----".__.__.~- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation ofthe stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: /1 ~tiJ( /j7f/l~ Signed ./7 /-X ~ f/)-.)tÙt6 ol--/~ rintname Address -- - .__._--"._._."-"~,---" November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and ail those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very smail part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~Ct~ Signed -JOI-\\-J C· fOJCL.( Print name Address a____. - - __ ..' ._ _0'__. _._~_,_.~_~___..._____ .'_..'_ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ C¡¡ IV '" '" II, ~ 0 ~AO~ (~ ~Address -._,--'".,"._""---"-_."~---- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: 11m ~ Signed rp~~ A.V\.<-L. Print·name / ....-....- "__H ~--_. - ._-_._----~------_.__..- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ß~~ 'Signed 0-0\3c1Cl ßoI3v..\.(.¡J(t. Print name Address -_.._.._.~-------------~-_..-.."~-----_.._- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chu1a Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ I ~ f)1a r ìCjIJI7¿ f:¡)/J ~rint name ~ Address - _.,~._--_.- . '. .---.-'.-----++---...------ . "'_'0_'_'.""'___".___. ....... .,_._.__~_.___"_~..__.__._ ... u _..._ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ----- .-) P-;:L~"_ "'--:::::;ë...1:. _.- Signed R .<:... h..D T"J () R 1=" A (II oS Print name Address e~""R \) I~'ï~ I e,~ C'\ \~ \C' - r¡ ~ \'2 - ...._.~.._..~--- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of J the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and ! order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. J Very Sincerely: , '$' c~ ~ 1"\,'-- \ ÁJ/i / l{ , .. \ V Signed \ "v '" ~\C,\ \ ~ \{ , .~ 0.. \' I Print name ~ Address C' ,Li, C\\I1\O _r)é\12 -.---- -- _.-.~--- - -_.._~ - -----_.~-_._.._--_._--_._,_..-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .~ ~ \" . \ ~~, \~.~~ \\ Signed D Q~\\1. \J \'11« Print name Address ~:\l '\\~\O "-_.._-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .I /,/, ;(1'1 f{ttIt~ ( t q 0. ( !<2pnnt name J ddress - ..~,.. ------ - - ---- ~---~--_.------_.~._---~-- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9,1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .~ ]41 ' . .... ."cIu¡··úJt~gned 'f) h C{rrYJEllleJ"1 h ¡(- It.. Print name ddress -.... ._--.._-_.__..__..~ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation oBhe stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~. , . . \\...; '^I\ 'Q."" ~ .¡y... \~" vv.?rint name (\,-...)\ C'À, C\\ \0 -...---..--.-......---.--- -----.,-----.-... November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ) , clQyb ~ Signed - S (:0-1" ì\)¿;:('-LE.. ¿Print name ~ - - - Address . ..--"---.------"-----.----.-.'" November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard. roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: Jj~ ilk; Signed h,.: l>.LÙ~ ,2 Print name Address ----........_- ------~---- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: m ~O-/;;, Signed /f/!1/f,- i ry ~/U Print name Address . ~-_.._...__.._..--- ..,.---.- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation ofthe stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: .';1; Signed ~Ç~/V, 1 I!~l) /1 - -f-. Print name , Address ________._ .__·h__,.,__·_·______ November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceDtable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of, the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ( ··ø"5" Signed ~-... . //;;,¿.¡,.¿' Ý ;/147)' /Sv /1/ Print name Address __ _..___n__.__ - _._------"--_._.__..._._,-~_.._- November 1997 Honorable Mayor Horton Chula Vista City Council This letter is to urge you to uphold the decision of the Chula Vista Safety Commission (October 9, 1997) and order the installation of the all way stop sign on Hidden Vista at Woodhouse. Traffic volume (mostly short-cutters from Rancho Del Rey) and its' speed has greatly impacted our neighborhood. The new stop sign at Windrose Way, by itself, will not significantly impact the numbers of cut-through drivers, or their speed. We need the Woodhouse stop to provide a safer crossing for all the children and other pedestrians who use Terra Nova Park and all those who park along Hidden Vista Way. The Safety Commission agreed with us. Even when the Clear View crossing guards are on duty, it has become increasingly difficult and dangerous for them to do their job, and they are at the intersection only a very small part of the day. Our children are very active with after school clubs, soccer practice, baseball and many other events in the park. They also bicycle, skateboard, roller-blade, and walk their dogs around the park. All this means having to cross Hidden Vista with cars travelling 40 mph or more, and at an average rate of one every 5 to 7 seconds during the afternoons. This is unacceptable. This is not the design use for this street. Please keep our children and us safe, and order the installation of the stop signs at Woodhouse. Very Sincerely: ~ss' -_...,.,_._.,-,~--_._.~._~- ..~_.._---------_._._-_._--,,--,_... .,._....~-~..._--,- _._~_._-----------