Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 1998/02/17
-\ declare IIndlll' penalty 01 perjury that \ aRl employad by tha City 01 Chula Vista in the Office of the City Clerk and that I posted this Agenda/Noti=e on the Bulletin Board at Tuesday, February 17, 1998 the Public rvi es Building L'6í'~~ Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. DATED JJ g--SIGNED ~ Public Services Building Re.ular Meetin. of the Citv of Chula Vista Citv Council CALL TO ORDER I. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Moot _, Padilla _. Rindone _' Salas _. and Mayor Horton _. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. MOMENT OF SILENCE 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 20, 1998. 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DA V: a. Proclamation declaring Saturday, Fehruary 28, 1998, as "Kent Froede Memorial Classic Day." The proclamation will he presented by Mayor Horton to Dale and Joy Pruitt, and Mark Smolanovich. b. Presentation by the Boys and Girls Club to the City for support in the matching grant program. The presentation will be made by Dr. Lowell Billings, Chainnan of the Board, and John Clingan, Boys and Girls Club CEO. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 12) The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that the item be puLLed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fiLL out a "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in Closed Session on 2/10/98, that there were no reportable actions which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. It is recommended that the letter be received and filed. b. Letter from Natasha Martinez, Project Manager, The EastLake Company, requesting the City's support on Saturday, May 2, 1998, for the Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center and The EasfLake Company health and wellness fair at Chula Vista Community Park in EastLake and a regional, non-competitive cycling tour to he known as Cycle EastLake '98. It is recommended that action on this ikm be deferred until the street closure request comes before Council. c. Letter from Matthew T. O'Neill requesting financial assistance to attend the Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge Vouth Leadership Conference. It is reco111111ended that $50 from the Council contingency account be granted to Matthew O'Neill towards expenses incurred for his attendance at the Freedoms Foundation Conference. -" ..,~ -~................- ~ u""' .............. ......".....;1 ~....~ «n«............. LH.... '--'HUla ~ j.:lUl. j UIJU.... Agenda -2- February 17, 1998 6. ORDINANCE 2721 AMENDING SECTION 2.05.010 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH THE POSITION OF ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE IN THE UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE (second readine and adoDtion) - The Police Chief has recently promoted two lieutenants to the rank of Police Captain, filling vacancies created by one recent retirement and the "unfreezing" of a six month vacant position. The restructuring of the Executive Management of the department (as a result of the long-term vacancy) has proven beneficial and at the same time, bighlighted the need for a "Number Two" person. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (Chief of Police) 7. RESOLUTION 18896 APPROVING THE FIRE STATION NUMBER 4 DEFERRAL AGREEMENT - The City is in receipt of a request by Rancho Del Rey Investors, L.P. (the McMillin Companies) to defer the advancement of funds for relocating Fire Station Number 4 from the current site on Otay Lakes Road to the approved site in Rancho Del Rey on Paseo Ranchero north of East "H" Street. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Fire Chief and Deputy City Manager Krempl) 8. RESOLUTION 18897 APPROVING SUBMISSION OF A PRELIMINARV REGISTRATION AGREEMENT WITH EXPO 2000 IN HANNOVER, GERMANV FOR THE CHULA VISTA TELECENTER PROJECT - In 1997, Telecenter staff was approached by the World's Fair Exposition and asked to apply for participation in the upcoming World Exposition being held in Hannover, Germany in the year 2000 (EXPO 2000). The International Advisory Board of EXPO 2000 and other experts from various fields got together in Hannover in July 1997 to review 236 applications for projects from all over the world. The Telecenter was one of 73 projects that has been recommended for registration at EXPO 2000. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Environmental Resource Manager) 9. RESOLUTION 18898 ACCEPTING FEDERAL LIBRARV SERVICES AND TECHNOLOGV ACT, BUILDING COMMUNITV SUPPORT FOR CALIFORNIA STATE PUBLIC LIBRARIES GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000, APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1997/98 BUDGET - The State Library has awarded the Chula V ista Public Library $10,000 in Library Services and Tecbnology Act Building C0111111unity Support for California Public Lihraries grant funds. These funds will be used to hire a professional fund raising consultant to meet the goal of raising $250,000 for the newly established "Friends of the Chula Vista Library Endowment Fund." Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Library Director) 4/Sth's vote required. 10. RESOLUTION 18899 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO DBX INCORPORATED, FOR THE STREET LIGHT INST ALLA TION PROJECT ALONG "E" STREET BETWEEN BROADW A V AND FOURTH A VENUE (TF 249) - This project was approved and funded in the City's 1996/97 Capital Improvement Program. The project would he accomplished in conjunction with San Diego Gas and Electric Company's Undergrounding project. The work to he done includes the installation of new or relocated street light standards, luminaries, mast arms, new meter pedestal cabinet to service the existing traffic signals at Fifth Avenue and "E" Street and other miscellaneous equipment necessary to make the system operational. Staff reco111111ends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) ....------..-- -_.._~.._. -.-- Agenda -3- February 17, 1998 II.A. RESOLUTION 18900 EST ABLISHING DATES FOR PROPERTV OWNERS TO BE READV TO RECEIVE UNDERGROUND SERVICE AND THE REMOV AL OF POLES AND OVERHEAD FACILITIES WITHIN UNDERGROUND UTILITV DISTRICT NUMBER 123, PHASE 1, ALONG "E" STREET FROM BROADW A V TO FOURTH A VENUE - On 10/27/92, Council approved estahlishing Underground Utility District Number 123 along "E" Street from Broadway to Toyon Lane. On 12/15/92, Council approved amending Policy Number 585-01 by expanding the use of SDG&E utility funds to reimburse all affected properties for the cost of undergrounding of private service laterals. Staff rec0111l11ends approval of the resolution: (I) setting 3116/98, as the date by which owners shall be ready to receive underground services and 7115198, as the date by which poles, overhead wires and associated structures shall be removed within Underground Utility District Number 123, Phase 1, along "E" Street from Broadway to Fourth Avenue; and (2) authorizing the expenditure of utility allocation funds to subsidize private service lateral conversions serving non-single family residential properties within the entire district from Broadway to Toyon Lane. (Director of Public Works) B. RESOLUTION 18901 AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF UTlLITV ALLOCATION FUNDS TO SUBSIDIZE PRIVATE SER VICE LATERAL CONVERSIONS SERVING NON-SINGLE F AMIL V RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITHIN THE "E" STREET UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER 123 BETWEEN BROADWAV AND TOVON LANE 12. RESOLUTION 18902 ACCEPTING CONTRACT WORK FOR THE "INSTALLATION OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF FOURTH A VENUE BETWEEN CHULA VISTA ADULT SCHOOL AND ORANGE A VENUE (STM-302)" PROJECT; APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITV; AND TRANSFERRING TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 253-2530-STL233 TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 253-2530-STM302 - Builders Staff Corporation had almost completed the project when the City stopped making payments due to stop notices and a lawsuit. The company was forced into bankruptcy, leaving some work incomplete. The bonding company. Redlands Insurance Company. completed the project on 6/2/97. The lawsuit has been settled and Redlands Insurance Company has submitted an invoice which will finalize the project. Change Order Number I includes $27,805.49 for extra work items as well as a deduction of $9,851.02 in contract items that have been adjusted or deleted increasing the contract hy $17,954.47 to a total amount of $245,905.17. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) · . . END OP CONSENT CALENDAR · · · ADJOURNMENT TO REGULAR AND/OR JOINT MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCV ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State law, however, generally prohibits the City Council from taking action on allY issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. ,.----.,,---------" Ageoda -4- February 17, 1998 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by Law. If you wish to speak to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 13. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) ONE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS - Otay Ranch Company has submitted a request to amend the Otay Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) One Plan Planned Community District Regulations to allow market flexibility in detennining the provision of Hollywood driveways. Staff recommends the ordinance be placed on first reading. (Director of Planning) ORDINANCE 2722 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OT A V RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) ONE PLANNED COMMUNITV DISTRICT REGULATIONS (first readin2) 14. PUBLIC HEARING GPA-97-05/PCZ-97-03 - (1) AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE PROPERTV LOCATED AT 675 OXFORD STREET TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION FROM OPEN SPACE/RESEARCH AND LIMITED MANUFACTURING TO PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMMERCIAL; AND (2) REZONE THE PROPERTV FROM R-I (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMIL Y) AND IL-P (INDUSTRIAL LIMITED- PRECISE PLAN OVERLA V) TO CO-P (OFFICE COMMERCIAL) - PRECISE PLAN) PALOMAR STATION, LLC - The applicant, Palomar Station, LLC, is requesting an amendment to the General Plan and rezoning of property located at 675 Oxford Street from residential and limited industrial to oftîce commercial in order to develop the property as offìce space or, with approval of a conditional use permit, multi-hunily residential. The applicant has indicated that they have tried unsuccessfully to market the property as industrial land. Staff recommends the public hearin2 be continued indelinitelv. (Director of Planning) Continued from the meeting of 2/10/98. 15. PUBLIC HEARING GPA-98-01 & PCM-98-09 - REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM, THE RANCHO DEL REY GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THE SITE UTILIZATION PLAN, THE LAND USE DISTRICTS MAP AND THE PLANNED COMMUNITV REGULATIONS TO CREATE THE C-2 COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICT FOR THE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND AT 820 PASEO RANCHERO AND ADDING AND MODIFVING THE PERMITTED, CONDITION ALL V PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED LAND USES APPLICABLE TO THE C-I AND C-2 COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICTS - Rancho del Rey Investors, LP, the owners of the Rancho del Rey Information Center located at 820 Paseo Ranchero will soon not have a need for the existing Information Center as most of Rancho del Rey will be built out over the next year. Because of this anticipated build out, they would like to market this property now for future sale. The current allowable land uses under a Community Purpose designation are highly restrictive and, therefore, the property owners are requesting changes in order to broaden the permitted and conditionally permitted land uses for this parcel. Staff Tt~commends Council approve the resolution and place the ordinance on first reading. (Director of Planning) -------.--.-----..,.-.- ~ .--...-------....- Agenda -5- F"bruary 17, 1998 A. RESOLUTION 18903 CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM DESIGNATION FROM OPEN SPACE TO COMMERCIAL RETAIL, AMENDING THE RANCHO DEL REV SPECIFIC PLANNING AREA I PLAN GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITV FACILITV TO COMMERCIAL, AND CHANGING THE SITE UTILIZATION PLAN DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITV FAClLlTV CF-l TO COMMERCIAL CENTER C-2 FOR THE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 820 PASEO RANCHERO B. ORDINANCE 2723 AMENDING THE RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA I PLAN BV CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 820 PASEO RANCHERO TO THE C-2 COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICT AND ADDING AND MODlFVING THE PERMITTED, CONDITION ALL V PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED LAND USES APPLICABLE TO THE C-l AND C-2 COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICTS (first re¡¡din2) BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one of the City's Boards, Commissions, and/or Committees. None submitted. ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantiaL discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and staffrecommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak" foro! available in the Lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. None submitted. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by CounciLmembers. OTHER BUSINESS 16. CITV MANAGER'S REPORTCS) a. Scheduling of meetings. 17. MA VOR'S REPORT(S) a. City Council Tour, Saturday, Fehruary 28, 1998,9:00 a.m. Agenda -6- February 17, 1998 18. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the regular City Council meeting on February 24, 1998 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A joint meeting of the City Council/Redevelopmtmt Agtmcy will be held immt::diately following the City Council meeting. ____.__ ________..________H. "I deçlare tinder penelty of perjury that I am emploved by t~e Git" of Chuia Vista in tha Office of the Cit'l Glerk and that I posted this Agenda/Notica on the Bulletin Board at Tuesday, February 17, 1998 the Public rvi es Building 8~ Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. DATED c;l, ~ Õ SIGNED c---" Public Services Building (irmnediately following the City Council ee ng) Citv of Chula Vista Citv Council CLOSED SESSION AGENDA Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. Unless the City Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states othenvise at this time, the Council will discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are permitted by law to be the subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised shoultl be discussed in closed session to best protect the interests of the City. The Council is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of final action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session, reports of final action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office. I. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING - Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 · USA v. City of San Diego. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELEASE - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 · City Manager PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 · City Manager CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTV NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 · Property: City right-of-way. Negotiating parties: City of Chula Vista (Sid Morris) and SDG&E. Under negotiations: Price and terms for interest În City right-of-way granted by Gas and Electric Franchise. · Property: Approximately 24.95 acres of property located at 1800 Maxwell Road, Chula Vista. Negotiating parties: City of Chula Vista (Sid Morris) and SDG&E. Under negotiations: Purchase price and terms. Closed Session Agenda -2- Fehruary 17, 1998 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 . Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, POA, IAFF, Executive Management, Mid-Manag~ment, and Unrepresented. Employee organization: Chula Vista Employ~~s Association (CVEA) and Western Council of Engineers (WCE), Police Ofticers Association (POA) and International Association of Fire Fighters (lAFF). Unrepresented employee: Executiv~ Management, Mid-Management, and Unr~pr~sented. 2. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION --..--.-- - - ----~--_..._~._,-,,_.._,--- ,.. . ..4 ,,-J I.r .0c.a.~...\_,__ February 12, 1998 TO: The Honorable Mayor and city council FROM: John D. Goss, City Manager &f; 1010 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting of February 17, 1998 This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular city council meeting of Tuesday, February 17, 1998. Comments regarding the written Communications are as follows: Sa. This is a letter from the city Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in Closed Session on 2/10/98, there were no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED. 5b. This is a letter from Natasha Martinez, Project Manager, the EastLake Company, requesting the City's support on Saturday, May 2, 1998, for the Sharp Chula vista Medical Center and the EastLake Company Health and Wellness Fair at Chula Vista Community Park, and a regional, non-competitive cycling tour to be known as Cycle EastLake '98. A request will be coming forward at a future date for permission to close the street and at that time staff will bring forward a recommendation on the provision of support for this event. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ACTION ON THIS ITEM BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE STREET CLOSURE REQUEST COMES BEFORE COUNCIL. 5c. This is a letter from Matthew T. O'Neill, a student at Bonita vista High School, requesting financial assistance to attend the 1998 Youth Freedom and Leadership Conference at Freedoms Foundation, Valley Forge. Under Council Policy 159-02, Council has approved the expenditure of funds for various Chula vista students to attend this conference in exchange for a presentation to a City youth group. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT $50 FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT BE GRANTED TO MATTHEW O'NEILL TOWARDS EXPENSES INCURRED FOR HIS ATTENDANCE AT THE FREEDOMS FOUNDATION CONFERENCE. JDG:mab ~~~ :£t_ ~ ~~~~ ......--"-'" OlY OF CHUlA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY A TIORNEY Date: February 11, 1998 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: John M. Kaheny, City AttorneY,~~ ¡I Re: Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session for the Meeting of 2/10/98 The City Council met in Closed Session on 2/10/98 to discuss City of Chula vista v. Louis Fernandez, Gillespie v. City of Chula vista, Granite Construction v. City of Chula vista, Wolfe v. City of Chula vista, Griffin v. City of Chula Vista, Western States Petroleum Association, Public Employee Release: city Manager, Public Employee Appointment: city Manager and labor negotiations. The Redevelopment Agency met in Closed Session on 2/10/98 to discuss Conference with Real Property Negotiator: Price and terms for disposition-San Diego Padres Price and terms for acquisition/disposition-Pearl Development and San Diego Padres Price and terms for acquisition/disposition-Port District and San Diego Padres Price and terms for acquisition/disposition-Port District and Rohr, Inc. and San Diego Padres Price and terms for disposition-pacifica Companies and South Bay Pentecostal Church The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of his knowledge from observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the City Attorney participated, that there were no reportable actions which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. JMK: 19k C:\lt\clossess.no So,/ / 276 FOURTH AVENUE, CHULA VISTA' CAUFORNtA 91910 . (619) 691-5037 . FAX (619) 585-5612 '1'';' f'II!;I.QnurøRlqdod~ _._m__.__.._.__.___..'_._..__ ______.__,___,,_________....,_...u. -_..-~ ---~~- RECEIVED ["c;:;¡~· I):J 'J February 4, 1998 . v - ~ -;. '98 FEB -6__ Pl2 :31 ..- .l-----__ - ~ _ . CITY ÖFCWEAVIS=t Honorable Shirley Horton, Mayor ).\.1 CITY CLERK'S OFFI . City of Chula Vista 0ßt' THE 276 Fourth Avenue tASTLAKE Chula Vista, California 91910 COMPANY LLC Dear Mayor Horton and City Council Members: It is my pleasure to inform you of an exciting up-coming event in Chula Vista and to request the approval and support of City Council of the event. On Saturday, May 2,1998, Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center and The EastLake Company will be offering a full service health and wellness fair at Chula Vista Community Park in EastLake. In conjunction with the fair, The EastLake Company, as title sponsor, is organizing a regional, non-competitive cycling tour to be known as Cycle EastLake '98! It is our hope that the event will continue as an annual activity promoting active, healthy living while showcasing the scenic environment of eastern Chula Vista and the ARCO Olympic Training Center. Beneficiary of the event is the EastLake Educational Foundation, non-profit organization. Attendance at the cycling event, coordinated by Kinane Events, is anticipated at a minimum of 1,500. Cycle enthusiasts ITom throughout San Diego County and Orange County are expected to participate as well as families from throughout Chula Vista. Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center normally draws local attendance of 500-800 at their fairs. The City's Parks and Recreation Department has already approved and reserved use ofChula Vista Community Park for both activities. We would like to request that the City ofChula Vista support the event by assisting in providing police and traffic support, use of park personnei, and media and public relations support. Monetary sponsorship, of course, would be most welcome! Attached, in addition to general information regarding the scope of Cycle EastLake '98! and a profile ofKinane Events, is a sponsor benefits matrix for your review. We would be honored to include the City ofChula Vista as an official sponsor and include the city logo in all print materials. (On the enclosed Sponsor Benefits description, please note the 2/20 deadline for inclusion oflogos on entry forms.) I look forward to your positive response and to creating an exciting regional event benefiting all of us in Chula Vista. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, ~J7: Project Manager Enclosures: Event information (5) WRlnEN COMMUNICA TIONS c¿ ?c: Je~ QUlbra~ ('0 c¿J~ ¿{ ~/( '--1 ~ 12 ¿I~ 0Y1 . ~ 00 C~t~~r~~~'0127 . Focsímile(619)421-1830 .. .... ~ ~ CYCLE EASTLAKE 981 EVENT INFORMATION 11£ E451lAKE COWmY EVENT: Cycle EastLake 98! DATE: May 2, 1998 LOCATION: Chula Vista Community Park at EastLake ATTENDANCE: 1,500 Participants anticipated COURSE: Non-Competitive Cycling Tours (5, 12 and 30 Mile Courses). The courses will tour the picturesque master planned community of EastLake in Chula Vista. FEATURES: Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center Health & Wellness Fair Live Entertainment Tykes on Bikes Plenty of Refreshments BENEFICIARY: The EastLake Educational Foundation EVENT CONCEPT Cycle EastLake 98! is a non-competitive cycling adventure for riders of all ages and abilities. The ride (with 5, 12 & 30 mile courses) will tour in and around the rolling hills of the EastLake Community with spectacular vistas of the ARCO Olympic Training Center. Other planned events include: Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center Health & Wellness Fair, ''TYkes On Bikes" big wheel obstacle course, live entertainment, local Olympic Celebrities appearances and more. 0' ' OBJECTIVES · Provide a community event that involves families and the general population in a celebration of sharing and an active healthy lifestyle; · Create funds for the EastLake Educational Foundation, whose 1998 priorities are funding for technol- ogy and academic enhancement; · Create a unique cycling event for the family and the recreational cyclist; · Create a regional celebration that matches the needs and lifestyle pursuits of South San Diego County while showcasing the community of EastLake. · Promote lifelong health and wellness through the participation of Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center with a full scale health fair; · Promote the Spirit of Excellence through the recognition of local Olympic heroes and prominent athletes within the area; Sþ -02... " ~~ BENEFICIARY The EastLake Educational Foundation is dedicated to raising funds to support the highest quality public education in EastLake community schools. The core values of the EastLake Educational Foundation are founded in the belief that each child deserves a safe educational environment which honors and promotes the development of the individual's academic, social, emotional and physical well being. The EastLake Educational Foundation's goal to build a full partnership among the schools, the residential community and the broader business community is based on the knowledge that achieving excellence in education is the cooperative responsibility of our society. EastLake Educational Foundation priorities target support of technoJogy programs in three public schools within EastLake. Providing computer hardware, software, and staff training are of primary importance in the 1998 EastLake Educational Foundation's goals. EVENT MANAGEMENT Established in 1992, KINANE EVENTS currently manages many of Southern California's largest running, walking and cycling events including five of the largest walking and running events in Orange County. KINANE EVENTS is dedicated to developing and enhancing high quality cause-related events that have a positive measurable impact on the community. In 1997, KINANE EVENTS running, walking and cycling events attracted more than 70,000 participants and raised $1.2 million for charity. Ms. Kinane and KINANE EVENTS are committed to continually enhancing and promoting the events they manage to increase bottom-line net proceeds. X~ ents LIST OF EVENTS · Orange County Race For The Cure® · Mobil St Patrick's Day Run For The Blind · 15th Annual Spirit Run · Huntington Beach 4th of July Parade 5K · 14th Annual Bastille Day 8K15K .14th Annual Laguna Beach Classic · Saturn Cycling Tour · LA County Race For The Cure® ,... DEMOGRAPHICS *CYCLING **EASTLAKE COMMUNITY 54% Male 60% Ages 35-54 46% Female 64% HousehoJds with children 73% College Educated 54% Annual household income $40,000-75,000 52% Individual Income >$40,000 36% Annual household income $75,000 or more 94% Travel on Vacations 75% Have computers in home 76% Own their own home * Phillips Report - Feb. 1995 5J:; :3 **EastLake Company Jan. 1998 ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES PRINT AD CAMPAIGN An extensive print promotional campaign has been planned to significantly boost awareness and excite- ment and attendance at the Cycle EastLake 98! * Union 1ìibune- TBD * Competitor Magazine - circulation 90,000 * Race Place - circulation 65,000 RADIO CAMPAIGN A comprehensive promotional radio campaign with prominent San Diego radio stations is being prepared to create excitement and maximize attendance at the Cycle EastLake 98! The planned radio campaign will include over 100 PSA's. WEB SITE ADVERTISING EastLake Company will feature the Cycle EastLake 98! Entry Form in the front page of their home site. Sponsor logos will be prominently featured, with links available to sponsor's site. The Eastlake website is visited by new home shoppers, current residents, and the WWW community. Hits to web site average 5,000 a week. Interested participants will download an entry form. PUBLIC RELATIONS News releases and public service announcements will be distributed to all major newspapers and magazine publications, plus radio and TV stations in San Diego County to ensure maximum exposure and event success. The public relations campaign will be managed by Capener Matthews & Walcher. EVENT BROCHURE 70,000 entry forms will be distributed via direct mail and regionally distributed through local sporting events, health clubs, sporting goods stores as well as through our sponsors. OFFICIAL POSTER 1,000 four color top quality posters distributed throughout San Diego County. OFFICIAL T-SHIRT 1,800 custom t-shirts will be produced and distributed to all registered event participants and volunteers. EVENT INFORMATION SHEET 1,000 Event Information Sheets containing event details and special features will be produced and distrib- uted to all registered participants. DAY OF EVENT PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES * Banner opportunities at startlfmish and along the courses * Complimentary 10 X 10 Expo Booth * Public Address Announcements * Coupon distribution * Product Sampling * Participant Bib Numbers * Complimentary entries Sj; -1" ICycle EastLake '98! Sponsor Benefitsl 9~9Ir¡fi¡Mm~·.. ···ii$~;9ººii..·i . ...... _______. Company Official Assist with Start X Company Official Assist with Awards X X Company Logo on Bib Numbers X X Company Banners in Stage Area X X X Company Name on StartlFinish Banners X X Introduction on Stage X X X Company Logo on 2,000 I-Shirts X X X Name/Logo in alJ Newspaper Ads X X X X X X X Name Mention in alJ Press Releases X X X X Complimentary Booth Space X X X X Logo included in Early Bird Flyers * X X X X Name/Logo on 1,000 Posters * X X X X Name/Logo on 70,000 Entry Forms* X X X Name Coupon/Sample Opportunities X X X X 8 6 4 2 P A Announcements X X X X Website Advertising: Name & Logo on site X X X X *Print deadlines: Early Bird Flyer-2/9/98; Entry Form-2/20/98; Poster-3/2/98 ~-f x~ i£vents 1998 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS EST. EST. NET EVENT DATE ATTEND. CHARITY FEBRUARY 22, 1998 15TH ANNUAL 24HR. FITNESS SPIRIT RUN 6,000 $120,000 FASIDON ISLAND - NEWPORT BEACH, CA '98 MAJOR SPONSORS: O.C. Register, Comcast, ASICS, Irvine Company BENEFITS: Harborview, Anderson, Lincoln Elemenlaly Schools MARCH 15, 1998 19TH ANNUAL MOBIL ST. PATRICK'S DAY RUN 10,000 $150,000 \ DEL AMO FASHION CENTER· TORRANCE ~ ~~ "98 MAJOR SPONSORS: MobR OR Corporation, Daily Breeze BENEFITS: Vista for Blind Cblldren, IDe. MARCR22,1998 3RD ANNUAL SATURN CYCLING TOUR 3,000 $25,000 MISSION BAY-SAN DIEGO, CA '97 MAJOR SPONSORS: Sportmart, Bank of America., SPRINT, Long's Drugs BENEFITS: American Cancer Society MAY 2, 1998 CYCLE EASTLAKE 98 1,500 $15,000 ~~~\MAJOR SPONSORS: Cbula Vista Community Park at EastLake EastLake Company BENEFITS: EastLake Educational Foundation MAY 3, 1998 16TH ANNUAL BMW LAGUNA BEACH CLASSIC 5,000 $55,000 SAWDUST FFSTIV AL - LAGUNA BEACH, CA '97 MAJOR SPONSORS: BMW, The Orange County Register. Orange Coast Title BENEFITS: SchooIPower Educational Foundation JULY 4, 1998 HUNTINGTON BEACH4m OF JULYPARADE5K 60,000 $30,000 CMC CENTER - HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA '97 MAJOR SPONSORS: The Orange County Register. Paå1ica Hospital, Saturn of Orange County BENEFITS: Huntington Vailey Boys and Girls Club JULY 18, 1998 14TH ANNUAL PACIFICARE BASTILLE DAY 8K15K 6,000 $150,000 mE SUITON PLACE HOTEL, NEWPORT BEACH, CA '97 MAJOR SPONSORS: OC Register; PacifiCare. SI, Josepb Health Systems, NIKETOWN, Everen Securities BENEFITS: Second Harvest Food Bank of Orange County SEPTEMBER 27,1998 7TH ANNUAL RACE FOR THE CURE - ORANGE COUNTY 23,000 $600,000 FASIDON ISLAND, NEWPORT BEACH (Two Day Expo) '97 MAJOR SPONSORS: The Orange County Register, Moore Business Solutions, Chevron BENEFITS: Susan G. Kamen Breast Cancer Foundation O' . OCTOBER 18, 1998 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBERTY WALK "FREEDOM FROM DOMESTIC VIOlENCE" LAJOLLA, CA 5,000 $50,000 '97 MAJOR SPONSORS: National University, PinnFund, Home Depot, Foodmaker, Asies BENEFITS: San Diego County Domestic Violence Sbelters & Programs OCTOBER 25,1998 ORANGE COUNTY LIBERTY WALK "FREEDOM FROM DOMESTIC VIOlENCE" DANA POINr, CA 5,000 $40,000 '97 MAJOR SPONSORS: Orange County Register; Bank of America., SOGB, Western Digital, Asics BENEFITS: Orange County Domestic Violence Sbelters & Programs NOVEMBER 15, 1998 3RD ANNUAL RACE FOR THE CURE - LOS ANGELFS 8,000 $250,000 ROSE BOWL· PASADENA, CA RON. CHAIRS MADONNA, CHER, FOREST WIllT AKER '97 MAJOR SPONSORS: JCPenney. Daily News, Kf1640AM BENEFITS: LA. County SusanG. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACf: KINANE EVENTS 32/6 2987 Highland Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92008· (760) 434-2312 . FAX (760) 434-7706 uuu !RP,,n<p.ti1L28LQR). RECEIVED Matthew T. O'Neill 454 Parkside Court '518 FEB. _6 Pl2 '31 Chula Vista, CA 91910-7528 ' 28 January 1998 FEB Q CITY OF CHULA VISTA Chula Vista City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 ---.-- _. Dear Chula Vista City Council: I an1 one of thirty-six high school students tram San Diego County recently selected to attend the 1998 Youth Leadership Conference at Freedoms FOW1dation at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania. TIle mission of Freedoms Fowulation at Valley Forge is. . . . . . to impart to Americans - particularly young .Americans - an understanding of and commitment to our national heritage, the basis values upon which this nation was built. the tree enterprise system and responsible citizenship. The conference 011 the Valley Forge campus will include meetings with prominent historians, educators, journalists, and economists. TI1ere will also be tours of Valley Forge National Park and historic Philadelphia. We will travel to Washington D.C., to meet legislators and visit important national historic sites. I am a junior at Bonita Vista High School, with a 4.33 scholarship and citizenship grade point average. I have attended Soutl1westem College for the past two semesters as well. My school activities include being the Intemet Editor-in-Chief of the school newspaper (tl1e Crnsader), a Co-Captain of the Speech and Debate Team, and I am the student leader of Bonita Vista High School's Edncational Technology Committee. In the community area I am also an Eagle Scout and an active member of the Boy Scouts of America Troop 15!. My service project was redoing a preschool playground because of unsafe play conditions. Recently. I was selected to be one of 12 students from Southern California to participate in the "Best and Brightest II" program which was sponsored by Microsoft Corporation and Vortex Data Systems (a technology education center). llis program will lead to a Microsoft Certified Product Specialist (MCPS) degree in Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 and supporting technologies and bring me halfway to earning the next degree of Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE). The San Diego COWlty Chapter of Freedoms FOWldation at Valley Forge organizes, sponsors, and Wlderwrites a significant portion of the costs of the trip. We students are asked to raise a total of $600 by 1 March 1998. Please keep in mind that this is a non-profit organization and all donations are tax deductible. It would be greatly appreciated if you could assist me in completing tl1is goal that I have set for myself. To show my appreciation for your sponsorship, I would be deligl1led to come and talk with you further about this matter. I would also be pleased to present a program on the conference and Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge. Please call me at 619.426.7655, or you migl1t wish to contact an adult representative ftom Freedoms Foundation, Marcellite Penhune at 619.459.7402 if you need more infonnation. If you do wish to make a contribution then it is requested that all checks be made out to FFVF San Die2'o Countv Chanter and bemailedtoMrs.Pe1ù1une at tl1e address given below. Please include my name with the check. 1118I1k you for all of your time and consideration in this matter. lam hoping to hear or receive word in the near future. You sponsorsl1ip of me on this excitingly wonderfulleaming opportunity will not be forgotten. TI1anks again. Sincerely, ~~ MatthewT. O'Neill Marcellite Penhune Vice-President, Youth Programs 6730 Muirlands Drive I1J ~~IIJ'" ,.ATION~ ~Jolla.CA92037 /) WRITTEN COMMv~~h... % Ce. ~~(7/ ___ ~ ¥? 'J ~~, ~7C-/ 0;-, % /-~ ;;K-eß~i ORDINANCE NO. c2 ?~/ ~ í\"'P~~ ' sF~ ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CH~~STA AMENDING SECTION 2.05.010 OF THE ICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH THE POSITION$~ SSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE IN THE UNCLASSI SERVICE ~<;) SECTION I: That section ~5. 010 of the Chula vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to ~ead as follows: 2.05.010 Unclassified positions established. In addition to those unclassified positions specifically delineated in Section 500 of the Charter of the city, there are established the unclassified positions entitled deputy city manager, assistant to the city manager, deputy city clerk, assistant fire chief, assistant chief of police. assistant director of planning, assistant director of finance, assistant director of personnel, assistant director of building and housing, city engineer, director of management services and information services, redevelopment coordinator, housing coordinator, transit coordinator, assistant director of community development, deputy director of public works/city engineer, public information coordinator, traffic engineer, deputy director of public works/operations, budget manager, revenue manager, assistant director of management services and information services, assistant library director, police captain, special planning projects manager, assistant to the Mayor and Council, border environmental business cluster manager and administrative assistant/office manager, California Border Alliance Group executive director, California Border Alliance Group analyst, California Border Alliance Group secretary, California Border Alliance Group deputy executive director and California Border Alliance Group coordinator for operations/ intelligence policy, plans and program. SECTION II: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect upon its second reading and adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by Richard P. Chief ~ ~'f1{NL. ~ Emerson, John M. Kaheny, City of Police Attorney C:\or\205010 02..0. 1 6 -- / - -,-~ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item ~ Meeting Date 02/17/98 ITEM TITLE: R I . / ,7Y1 ~ ' h ' S ' 4 eso utlon pprovlng t e Flre tatlon No. Deferral Agreement. SUBMITTED BY: Fire Chief~~ Deputy City Manager (' (?; l, REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~i~t) (4/Sths Vote: Yes _No..lU. The City is in receipt of a request by Rancho Del Rey Investors, L,P. (the McMillin Companies) to defer the advancement of funds for relocating Fire Station NO.4 from the current site on Otay Lakes Road to the approved site in Rancho Del Rey on Paseo Ranchero north of East "HII Street. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Resolution amending the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Rancho Del Rey SPA III which would grant a payment deferral until the adoption of the revised Public Facilities DIF (PFFP) Update or until July 1, 199B, whichever occurs first; and that Council authorize the Mayor to execute the First Amendment. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable DISCUSSION: The purpose of this item is to consider a request by Rancho Del Rey Investors, L.P. (the McMillin Companies) to defer the advancement of funds for relocating Fire Station NO.4 from the current site on Otay Lakes Road to the approved site in Rancho Del Rey on Paseo Ranchero north of East "H" Street (Attachment 'A') . The request is 1 7-/ Item: Meeting Date: 2/17/98 Page: 2 . to defer the payment until the adoption of the revised Public Facilities DIF or July 1, 1998, whichever occurs first. The existing performance bond is proposed by McMillin to remain in effect during the proposed interim period. Background In July of 1995, the City and McMillin agreed upon terms and conditions including financing for a new relocated fire station in Rancho Del Rey (Attachment 'B') . The terms of the agreement were memorialized as condition #53.5 in the project's final map supplemental subdivision improvement agreement. The agreement included a provision for McMillin to deposit with the City on February 1,1998, an advance of $598,600 adjusted upward for inflation from February, 1996. The funds were for the construction of a 4,000 square foot 2-bay fire station including furnishings and other normal appurtenances associated therewith. That money is now due. However, two significant events have occurred since 1996 . First, the City is in the process of updating its Public Facilities Development Impact Fee Program (PFFP) and has also had a new draft Fire Station Master Plan prepared to update the 1989 Master Plan. This Plan contemplates a change in the way fire station obligations on major projects are met. Second, the current schedule for the construction of the new Fire Station #4 is such that the deferral requested by McMillin is of no consequence. PFFP U~date and the Fire Station Master Plan The PFFP and the Fire Station Master Plan are under preparation by a consultant and are either in draft form or nearly complete. With the annexation of the Otay Ranch Western Parcel and a revised fire station system, the Fire Station Master Plan will suggest that fire station needs be addressed differently and more globally through the Fire DIF fee than they have in the past. This approach, when fully laid out and presented to Council with the Master Plan, could affect both the amount of the obligation McMillin (as well as other developers) have for providing fire protection facilities and the timing of those obligations. For this reason, it makes sense to defer McMillin's February 1,1998 obligation (as long as it has no negative impact on City fire operations, capital improvement 2 7-c2. - Item: Meeting Date: 2/17/98 Page: 3 . planning, or the threshold standard) until the City Council receives all the necessary information and makes a final policy decision on both the FIRE DIF fee and Master Plan Updates. That information should be forthcoming to the Council in the next several months. Status/Timin9 for the Construction of the New Fire Station No.4 The project architect is in the process of completing the building elevations and the floor plan design for the fire station. An agreement is before the City Council at this same time to amend the project architect's scope of work to include the design of the adjacent Training Classroom as well. The updated project schedule estimates the construction of the fire station to begin in August or September of this year. The advance funds from McMillin would need to be available to the City at that time. In conclusion, staff supports the McMillin request and would condition the approval on retaining the security provided by McMillin to guarantee their obligation. In addition, we recmmnend adding a provision that the annual CPI adjustment for the ultimate amount deposited be adjusted monthly during the deferral period using the City's Pooled Investment rate (current rate is 5.76%) . This will protect the City in the event that the City Council decides in the final analysis not to change McMillin's current obligation for advancing the fire station costs. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. The deferral does not change or remove the previously agreed-upon commitment, nor the amount of the obligation, but allows for its reconsideration at a later date. Finally, the time frame of the deferral will not affect the ability of the City to proceed with the completion of the fire station design, preparation of bid documents, or the construction schedule for Fire Station No.4. ~ ?UJ.i: ~ 3 //3 -~..._.._--",-".. RESOLUTION NO. J?Yfh RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRE STATION NO. 4 DEFERRAL AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the city has received a request from Rancho Del Rey Investors, L.P. (the McMillin Companies) to defer the advancement of funds for relocating Fire station #4 from the current site on Otay Lakes Road to the approved site in Rancho Del Rey on Paseo Ranchero north of East "H" Street, and WHEREAS, the request is to defer the payment until the adoption of the revised Public Facilities DIF or July 1, 1998, whichever occurs first; and WHEREAS, the existing performance bond is proposed by McMillin to remain in effect during the proposed interim period; and WHEREAS, staff supports the McMillin request and would condition the approval on retaining the security provided by McMillin to guarantee their obligation; and WHEREAS, in addition, it is recommended that a provision of the Agreement provide that the annual CPI adjustment for the ultimate amount deposited be adjusted monthly subsequent to February 1, 1998, based on the City's Pooled Investment rate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Fire station No. 4 Deferral Agreement, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the city Clerk as Document No. . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized to execute said Deferral Agreement on behalf of the City of Chula vista. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that interest costs accrue during the interim period as well. Presented by Approved as to form by James Hardiman, Fire Chief ~'~~~ Jo M. Kaheny, ty At r ey c: \ rs\ fire#4. rdr /~y ___n ------------ ------ --._---. ---~-- ~o'tßC~ FIRE STATION NO. 4 DEFERRAL AGREEMENT This Deferral Agreement is made this day of February, 1998, by and between the City of Chula Vista, California and Rancho Del Rey Investors, L.P., with reference to the facts set forth below, which recitals constitute a part of this Agreement: WHEREAS, the City of Chula vista ("City") and Rancho Del Rey Investors, L. P. ("Developer") entered in a Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("Agreement") on July 5, 1995, whereby, Developer agreed to advance funding for Fire station No. 4 by a certain date; WHEREAS, Developer now wishes to modify and defer the funding for Fire station No. 4 and City will agree with such deferral. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Developer agree as follows: 1. Deposit. On July 1, 1998, or upon the adoption by Chula vista City Council of the revised Public Facilities DIF (PFFP), whichever occurs first, Developer will deposit with City the "Advance Amount" (as defined below) for the relocation of Fire station No.4 to Rancho del Rey, which shall include the design and construction of a 4,000 square foot, 2-bay fire station, including fixtures, furnishings and related costs. 2. Advance Amount. The amount advanced by Developer ("Advance Amount") shall be Five Hundred Ninety Eight Thousand six Hundred Dollars ($598,600) plus that interest accrued up to and including February 1, 1998, pursuant to Paragraph 10 of the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement. From February 1, 1998, up to and including the date of Developer's deposit of the Advance Amount, such Advance Amount will be adjusted monthly based on the City's Pooled Investment rate. C:\Agot\RDRSSIA.Aon 1 7'~ - -- -----,.- _.__.....~"_._- SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRE STATION NO. 4 DEFERRAL AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Deferral Agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS, L.P. , a California limited partnership By: By: McMillin project Services, Shirley Horton, Mayor Inc., a California corporation, as Attorney-In-Fact under Durable Power of Attorney Attest: U,t:.U ;::;/hCf Beverly Authelet City Clerk Approved as to form: By: Name: Title: John M. Kaheny City Attorney C:\Ag.t\RDRSSIA.A.n 2 7.-/ ¿, -- - :-':>:'.'¡O. .j¿;:':~'--,¿; Ci:, "L ~",:,~ ¿ '9, L7-:-L Ê '17 '.0/11 . .2 0 1.9gB ..\." \ Ic\ \../X; ljJ~Ul]~":'; January 15, 1998 'Î n '("'1'""',;':\ Mr. George KrempJ Deputy City Manager CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Krempl: We are writing this letter to request the City Council's approval of a deferral of the required payment for the advanced funding of Fire Station NO.4. Pursuant to the Rancho Del Rey SuppJemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement, dated July 5, 1995, Rancho . Del Rey Investors is required to advance the funding for relocating Fire Station NO.4. The Agreement requires the advance payment to be made on February 1, 1998. Because the City is in the process of updating the fire Station Master Plan and the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (DIF), which may adjust the amount of our Fire DIF obligation, we request the deferral of any payment untiJ the adoption of the revised Public Facilities DIF or July 1, 1998, whichever occurs first. The existing perfonnance bond will remain in effect during this interim period. Please present this request to the City Council for approval. Please contact me at (619) 336-3733, if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, CTF/cb h:\data 'nir'ftles\craig\ctycv3.doc /~7 ' ¡ Afbd1n1en{ A __. _'_n~_n'_____" RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 No transfer tax is due as this is a conveyance to a public agency ofl_ than a fee interest for which no cash consideration hao been paid or received. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (E)(.cerp+) Rancho del Rey SPA ill ~ This Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("Agreement") is made this - day of ,.ð~ ' 1995, by and between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, California ("eit#" "Grantee" for recording purposes only) and RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Developer" or "Grantor" for recording purposes only), with reference to the facts set forth below, which recitals constitute a part of this Agreement: A. This Agreement concerns and affects real property located in Chula Vista, California, more particularly described on Exhibit" A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property"). Property is also commonly known as Rancho del Rey SPA ill, a proposed land development project ("Project"). For purposes of this Agreement, the tenn "Project" shall include the tenn "Property.. B. Developer is the owner of the Property. C. City has approved a Tentative Subdivision Map commonly referred to as Rancho Del Rey SPA ill, Chula Vista Tract 90-02 ("Tentative Subdivision Map") for the subdivision of the Property. D. City has adopted Resolution No. 16222 ("Resolution") pursuant to which it approved the Tentative Subdivision Map subject to certain conditions as more particularly described in the Resolution. The description of the conditions in this recital section of this Agreement is intended only to summarize and paraphrase such conditions in the Resolution, and is not intended herein to modify or explain them, and is not intended as a basis for interpreting them. SUPP-SIA 7~2T 1<1'-,9' : JuIr 5. 1995 -1- ..... SIA for __ del Roy SPA m <>-- l' L.::MS -I ~~ .i\~tl~JV\/;,(\'Lß be reimbursed by the City for performing such work, as more specifically described in the condition. O. Condition 53.5 of the Resolution requires Developer and City, prior to approval of the first final map for the Project, to enter into a Development Agreement including a promise satisfactory to the City requiring the Developer to advance the costs of relocating, or at City's option, building and relocating, Fire Station No.4 to a site satisfactory to the City, in exchange for which Developer shall be granted certainty of entitlements or other mutually agreeable consideration. P. Condition No. 55 of the Resolution requires Developer, prior to approval of the first final map for the Project, to enter into an agreement to provide, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, a right turn lane at the intersection of Paseo del Rey and East "H" Street if certain threshold standards in the Growth Management Ordinance are exceeded, as more specifically described in the condition. Q. Condition No. 56 of the Resolution requires Developer, prior to approval of the first final map for the Project, to enter into an agreement to provide a park-n-ride facility and related improvements near the intersection of East "H" Street and Paseo Ranchero, or at the discretion of the City Council, satisfy the requirement of this condition through dedication, improvements, and/or finaI.1cial participation in a park-n-ride facility master plan. R. Condition No. 58 of the Resolution requires Developer, prior to approval of the first final map for the Project, to provide a schedule for the development of low income housing as defined in the agreement between the City and Rancho del Rey Partnership per City Council Resolution No. 15751 dated August 7, 1990. S. Condition No. 61 of the Resolution requires Developer, prior to approval of each final map for the Project, to enter into an agreement with the City to include the subdivisions in a Mello Roos public facilities district or an acceptable alternative financing program, subject to the approval of both the Chula Vista Elementary and Sweetwater IDgh School Districts. T. Condition No. 62 of the Resolution requires Developer, prior to approval of each final map for the Project, to enter into an agreement wherein Developer agrees to comply with that version of the Growth Management Ordinance in effect at the time a building permit is issued. Such compliance includes but is not limited to the then current East Chula Vista Transportation Phasing Plan and the adopted Air Quality Improvement Plan and Water Conservation Plan for Rancho Del Rey SPA m. U. Condition No. 63 of the Resolution requires Developer, prior to final map approval of any phase of the Project or unit thereof to enter into an agreement with the City whereby: SUl'i'-8IA July S, 1995 -3- //C; ...... SIA fa< __ del Roy SPA m done and to grant the construction contract to the Íowest qualified bidder. The detailed cost estimates, attached to this Agreement as Exhibits B and C, itemize those costs attributable to the removal of the Candlewood and Mission Verde sewer pump stations and exclude any work attributable to any non-pump subdivision improvement. The estimates are preliminary and subject to the final determination by the Director of Public Works upon completion of the pump improvements. Any claims for additional payment for extra work or charges during construction shall be justified and shall be documented to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. City agrees that when all work has been completed to the satisfaction of the City, Developer shall submit to City verification of payments made for the construction of the pump improvements. The Director of Public Works shall make the final determination on expenditures which are eligible for cash reimbursement. 10. Condition No. 53.5 - F1re Station. In complete satisfaction of Condition No. 53.5 of the Resolution, Developer agrees to advance the costs of relocating Fire Station No.4, and City agrees to negotiate in good faith with Developer the option to enter into a Development Agreement to grant Developer certainty of entitlements, as follows: a. Develo,per's Advance Fundin~ of Fire Station Relocation. In consideration of the option to obtain vesting of entitlements under a Development Agreement, Developer to advance the costs of relocating Fire Station No.4, as follows: (1) Advance of Fire Station Relocation Costs. On February 1, 1998, Developer will deposit with City the W Advance Amount" (as defined below) for the relocation of Fire Station No.4 to Rancho del Rey, which shall include the design and construction of a 4,000 square foot, 2-bay fire station, including fixtures, furnishings and related costs. (2) Advance Amount. The amount advanced by Developer (the "Advance Amount") shall be Five Hundred N"mety Eight Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($598,600), adjusted annually on February 1, 1996, February 1, 1997 and February 1, 1998 based on the one-year change (from January to January) in the 20 City Average building cost prices recorded in the National Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index. (3) . Security for Advance. Before recording the first Final Map in SPA ill, Developer will provide City with a performance bond in the amount of Six Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($650,000) to secure the Developer's obligation to deposit the Advance Amount. City shall immediately release the peñonnance bond upon Developer's deposit of the Advance Amount. (4) Non-reimbursable Amount. One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($125,000) of the Advance Amount shall be considered consideration for this Agreement and shall not be subject to credit or reimbursement. SUl'I'.s1A 7·-) t/ July 5, 1995 -8- Supp. SIA for _ del Roy SPA m (5) PFDIF Credits for Advance. City agrees to partially reimburse Developer for the Advance Amount by giving Developer credits against the fire services component of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee ("PFDIF") payable by Developer with respect to only SPA ill. Such credits are herein called "Fire PFDIF Credits". The fire services component of the PFDIF is currently One Hundred Forty One Dollars ($141) for each residential building permit, but the Fire PFDIF Credits shall be in the actual amount of the fire component of the PFDIF in effect at the time the building permits are issued. Neither Developer nor any Builder shall be required to pay any fire services component of the PFDIF for SPA ill. The Fire PFDIF Credits shall not apply to SPA I or SPA II. The Fire PFDIF Credits may be assigned by the Developer, in whole or in part, to any Builder or to a successor Developer, but shall not be deemed to have been assigned unless such assignment is specifically made by Developer in writing. If the PFDIF (or its fire services component) is abolished or materially reduced after the effective date of this Agreement, the Fire PFDIF Credits shall be applied, as determined by the greater of the last effective rate of the Fire PFDIF or $141 per unit, to any fees which replace the PFDIF (or its fire services component). (6) Reimbursement of R::Ilance of Advance Amount. On or before January 1, 2002, City shall reimburse Developer an amount equal to: the Advance Amount, less the Non-reimbursable Amount, less the total amount of all Fire PFDIF Credits given Developer (and its assigns). For example, if the Advance Amount is $650,000 and the total amount of all PFDIF Credits given as of the reimbursement date is $175,000, City shall reimburse Developer $350,000 ($650,000 - $125,000 - $175,000 = $350,000). b. DevelQPment A=ment. In consideration of Developer's agreement to advance the costs of relocating Fire Station No.4, City agrees to negotiate in good faith with Developer the right and option, in Developer's sole discretion, but no obligation, to enter into a Development Agreement to grant Developer certainty of entitlements for the Property. Developer's agreement to advance the funds for the relocation of Fire Station No.4 would be the City's sole consideration for the vesting of entitlements to be granted by the Development Agreement. Developer shall have the right and option, in its sole discretion, to exclude from the Development Agreement any prc.pwtj which has been acquired by, or is subject to a purchase or option contract to be acquired by, a third party. 11. Condition No. SS - Paseo del Rey Right Turn Lane. The right turn lane at East "H" Street and Paseo del Rey referred to in ConditiDn No. 5S of the Resolution has already been constructed in connection with the Rancho del Rey Power Center, as shown on the Improvement and Grading Plans for the widening of East "H" Street and Paseo del Rey, Phase 2, City of ChuIa Vista work order numbers PC-946 and PG-48S in satisfaction of condition No. SS of the Resolution. SUPP-SIA ?-// July S. 1995 -9- Sopp. SIA ro. __ del Roy SPA m ----- ---.--- Page I, ItemL Date: 2/17/98 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Title: R I' ) 'YIšC¡ Z· b" f r' .. ·th eso utlOn app vmg su mISSIOn 0 a pre Immary regIstratIOn agreement WI EXPO 2000 in Hannover, Germany for the Chula Vista Telecenter Project. Submitted by: Barbara Bamberger, Environmental Resource Manag~ Angie Jarchow, Telecenter Director Reviewed by: &,'f 5D~ (4/5th vote: Yes _ No L.) City Manager ~¡i In June 1997, telecenter staff was approached by the World's Fair Exposition and asked to apply for participation in the upcoming World Exposition being held in Hannover, Germany in the year 2000 (EXPO 2000). The International Selection Commission (ISe), made up of members of the International Advisory Board (lAB) of EXPO 2000 and other experts from various fields got together in Hannover in July 1997 to review 236 applications for projects from all over the world. The Teiecenter was one of73 projects that has been recommended for registration at EXPO 2000. Staff is recommending approval to submit a registration agreement that contains the measures of utilization of the EXPO 2000 Logo and the claim to be part of the catalogue/CD-ROM of all global EXPO 2000 Projects. This action gives tentative approval to city participation in the Universal World Exposition in Hannover Germany in the year 2000, with an escape clause if the telecenter closes prior to that time due to a lack of funding, if the city can't obtain a sponsor or other funding, or if the City determines it cannot deveiop an effective exhibit. RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve the resolution. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A. DISCUSSION: In June 1997, the City's Telecenter project was invited to submit an application to participate as possible exhibitor in the upcoming World's Fair Exposition in the year 2000, located in Hannover, Germany. Only those projects invited to apply have been considered as exhibitors. Expo 2000 is expected to attract participation and attendance from over 160 countries. In November, the City was informed that it had been chosen as one of 73 projects pre-selected for registration to participate in the EXPO 2000 "Projects All Over the World" World Exposition exhibit. "Projects All Over the World" is one of the main exhibit thematic areas EXPO 2000 Hannover. It concentrates on projects, which under diverse economic, social, cultural and political conditions, finds innovative solutions to problems oriented to the key theme of the World Exposition. This theme is "Humankind-Nature-Technology", and in particular it is geared toward local implementation of Agenda 21, signed at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro 1992.. 1 ç¡r.;j The City has been invited to move into the final round of the two-year selection process. It's nomination as one of 73 final projects does not assure that the City will participate in EXPO 2000. Council is being asked to approve the Agreement that is necessary to go onto the next round of the selection process. If chosen as a final project participant, the World's Fair committee will dictate how the City will present the Telecenter concept to the public. There are a number of options, which are discussed later. EXPO 2000 Time-table: May 1997: Invited to submit application for EXPO 2000. June 1997: Application submitted. August 1997: Notified that the telecenter was selected to become one of the projects recommended for registration. Jan 1998-Jan 1999: Further selection rounds for "Projects All Over the World". February 1998: Registration agreement presented to Council for approval and submitted to Expo 2000 Committee May 1998: Major press event announcing projects: to be held in Los Angeles at Gennan Consulate January 1999: EXPO 2000 will award selected projects the status of a recognized EXPO 2000 "Projects All Over the World" exhibitor June 1999: Second status report submitted on project exhibition plans June 2000 - October 2000: EXPO 2000 event December 2000: Final summary report submitted and Registration Agreement ends Options for Presentation of Telecenter if Selected: The Gennan Consulate is acting as the official EXPO 2000 office throughout the world. The organizing committee will be officially sending a notice to each Gennan Consulate close to the chosen project's locale. The Gennan Consulate will organize a press event announcing the participation of the Exhibitors and their Projects. The Consulate will invite regional media and members of the City Council to participate in the press event, to take place in Los Angeles. If accepted as a Project, the EXPO committee will provide the City will the following possible options for presentation of our exhibit. However, the ultimate decision on the display will be negotiated between the City and the Expo team, with the Expo team providing direction on the type of exhibits they hope to have for each participant. These include: 1. Participation within the National Pavilion of the Project's country-of-origin in EXPO 2000: This option is dependent upon the possibility that the United States' exhibit will want to incorporate the City's project into its official pavilion of the United States. This will be detennined by federal official authorities in charge of Expo 2000. IfChula Vista is invited to be included into the larger U.S. exhibition, it is likely the U.S. government has developed a budget for this purpose and we may be able to negotiate with them to fund the costs of the exhibit. 2 ;;/2 - -- ..---.---_.----_..._- - 2. Thematic Area: The second option for exhibition is to be designated as one ofthe exhibitions within a thematic area. There wiJJ be a number of thematic areas throughout the Expo 2000, similar to various thematic areas at Epcot Center at Disney World. One thematic area being planned for the Pair is the "Puture of Work" pavilion. This would be the most appropriate thematic area for the telecenter. The Pair wiJJ have over 10,000 square meters displaying various scenarios and projects related to this theme. In the case that we are invited to participate in a thematic area, it is unlikely we would need to send anyone to oversee the exhibition because the sponsor ofthe thematic area will have staffing available. Our exhibit would be approximately 3% of any thematic area. 3. International Organizations: Another option is to become part of an international organization's exhibition. In this case, Chula Vista's project would be incorporated into a pavilion or exhibition of an internationally active organization with a workforce theme. 4. Participation in 'Global Dialogue EXPO 2000' Series of Conferences: The final level of participation is for the Expo committee to invite the City to participate in a series of conferences to be held during EXPO 2000. The Pair wiJJ be holding 10 different series of dialogues covering various topics within EXPO 2000. Lasting 3 days, these 'global dialogues' will highlight one of the important topics in the program, and if Chula Vista is invited as a dialogue participant, representatives wiJJ be invited to speak on the telecenter as part of the three day series. Staff wiJJ be following up on these options once our selection looks more certain. Benefits: The key theme of the world Exposition is "Humankind-Nature-Technology". Our city's experiment with the Telecenter concept has been recognized by the World's Pair Committee as offering valuable lessons that could be applied in other cities around the world, important enough to be displayed as a future workplace option. During the past few years, telecenter staff have assisted cities around the world who have expressed interest in the Telecenter for their own communities. The Telecenter has brought national and international recognition to the City. Representatives úom municipalities in Russia, Japan, Germany, Australia and Prance have visited the telecenter for tours, and when government officials outside the United States come to San Diego for official visits, the telecenter seems to be on their list of government projects to visit. EXPO 2000 offers the City of Chula Vista an additional opportunity to showcase its work, possibly reaching beyond the Telecenter, on an international stage. What action Council is being asked to take at this time: As stated earlier, the City has been pre-selected for registration and further selection rounds for "Projects All Over the World" EXPO 2000. The final decision will be determined by the end of 1998. In order to initiate our participation in the final round, the City must authorize a preliminary registration agreement. The agreement represents the City's expression of interest in participating in the EXPO 2000 stages of development. It simply allows us to become one of the projects recommended for registration as an 3 ?/J EXPO 2000 project. The agreement spells out the guidelines for use of the EXPO 2000 logo and the claim to be part of the catalogue/CD-ROM of all EXPO 2000 projects. In addition, by signing the agreement, the City would be obligated to submit status reports in June 1998 and June 1999, pius a final summary report in December 2000. However, if the telecenter closes due to a lack of funding, ¡fthe city can't obtain an exhibit sponsor, or if we determine it is not feasible to develop an effective exhibit, the City is entitled to terminate the agreement and would be released from all contract obligations. If Council approves the registration agreement, staff plans to formulate a committee made of community stakeholders and regionai marketing experts to help design the exhibition. Securing community involvement and support in the development of this application will maximize the quality of the exhibit and will help eliminate some of the staff time otherwise be spent developing the exhibit. Once Chula Vista is notified by the German Consulate that the City has been selected as one of the project participants, the City will have one year to develop the exhibition. If chosen to display an exhibit. staff anticipates the following steps will need to be complete: a. Develop a task force including possible corporate sponsors, media, public relations firms and stakeholders from the community. b. Identify two major corporate sponsors for exhibit. c. Develop design concepts for telecenter display d. Construct exhibit What Happens if the Telecenter Closes prior to Expo 2000: Staff has included an Amendment to the Registration Agreement which will protect the City, provide an 'out' clause that allows the City to cancel the agreement if the telecenter closes, at no cost to either party, at any time prior to Expo 2000. The City's signature on the Agreement will be contingent upon the Worid's Fair committee agreeing to these amendments. FISCAL IMPACT: The EXPO 2000 Committee requires that the City sign a non-binding registration contract to be considered for the final cut. There are no required financial obligations with this agreement. If the City is chosen to participate, the City will need to find corporate sponsorship to cover costs of the exhibit. If telecenter operations continue and corporate sponsorship is obtained to cover costs of the exhibit, the only impact the City might encounter will be staff time. The amount of staff time will be dependent upon the type of exhibit we are asked to provide. For the rest ofFY 1998, staff anticipates staff time to be approximately 8 hours a month. Although it is not possible to tell Council at this time what the exact fiscal impact will be, staff will return to Councii once more information is known. Attachments: Expo 2000 Submission Form Registration Agreement Description of Projects recommended for fmal round of consideration, including Chula Vista 4 'iš / i' RESOLUTION NO. ) gY9? RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING SUBMISSION OF A PRELIMINARY REGISTRATION AGREEMENT WITH EXPO 2000 IN HANNOVER, GERMANY FOR THE CHULA VISTA TELECENTER PROJECT WHEREAS, in June 1997, telecenter staff was approached by the World's Fair Exposition and asked to apply for participation in the upcoming World Exposition being held in Hannover, Germany in the year 2000 (EXPO 2000); and WHEREAS, the International Selection commission (ISC) , made up of members of the International Advisory Board (lAB) of EXPO 2000 and other experts from various fields got together in Hannover in July 1997 to review 236 applications for projects from allover the world; and WHEREAS, the Telecenter was one of 73 projects that has been recommended for registration at EXPO 2000; and WHEREAS, staff is recommending approval to submit a registration agreement that contains the measures of utilization of the EXPO 2000 Logo and the claim to be part of the catalogue/CD-ROM of all global EXPO 2000 Projects; and WHEREAS, this action gives tentative approval to city participation in the Universal World Exposition in Hannover Germany in the year 2000, with an escape clause if the telecenter closes prior to that time due to a lack of funding, if the city can't obtain a sponsor or other funding, or if the city determines it cannot develop an effective exhibit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve submission of a preliminary registration agreement with EXPO 2000 in Hannover, Germany for the Chula vista Telecenter Project. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ Barbara Bamberger, Environ- mental Resource Manager C:\rs\expo2000 .~ -:/~ - - _.... - -.-.-..'"- . - .". --- ATTACH~!¡[NT 1 Project No: :P6 Category: Future of Work International Projects EXPO 2000 Submission Form This form should be sent to the German Embassy or German General Consulate in your country (in case of international organizations it might be sent directly to EXPO 2000) Address: 1. Name of project: City of Chula Vista Telecenter 2. Short form: Telecenter 3· Organizer of project: Anoie Jarchow Mailing.address: 1550 East H Street Chula Vista, CA 91913 USA Telephone: 691-656-3063 Fax: 691-656-3087 E-mail: aiarchow@clubi.net 4· Contact person(s): Barbara Bamberger / Angie Jarchow Mailing address: 1550 East H Street Chula Vista, CA 91913 Telephone: Jarchow - 619-656-3063 Bamberber - 619-691-5296 Fax: Jarchow - 619-656-3087 Bamberger - 619-585-5612 E-mail: hh.mhprgprlðr; ~h,,' a-vi sta. ca. us 5· Type of Organization: 0 Non-Governmental Organization 0 Company \i)X Governmental Authority 0 Other: 6. Is the project sponsored/financed through 3rd Parties? )() Yes o No Name(s) of sponsoring organization(s): Federal and state funding, Cox Communications Cable Company <¡fr-¡f? Telecommuting and Telecenters represent a creative departure from the way we work: Telecommuting allows workers to use a new way of working to better their work environment and be closer to their families. Telecommuters can apply the time they would have spent driving to and from work to family/community activities. Telecommuters eliminate stress caused by a long commute. Telecommuters experience a 15-30% productivity increase due to fewer interruptions and improved task planning. These factors all contribute to higher job satisfaction among telecommuters. Demonstration of New PIannin~ Component: The Chula Vista Telecenter serves as a prototype to be included in future planning schem£s, providing data on such issues as: -- the impact of telecenters on local traffic flow -- optimal market size (geographic and population) for a telecenter - demographic characteristics of communities most likely to benefit -- the start-up and operational cost of a telecenter - co-uses and revenue opportunities of a telecenter San Diego includes some of the most congested traffic corridors in Southern California. Because of local demographics, inadequate public transportation to faraway employment centers, and the demands of multi-worker households, single vehicle trips are growing twice as fast as the population. The telecenter reduces air pollution, conserves energy and promotes better use of the highway and local arterial network. By creating "neighborhood-friendly," attractive facilities accessible by mass transit and blocks from major communities, the city has turned a "concept"-focused on the needs of a few "high end" information workers-into livable, not just workable, places for people to work. In addition, the project was intended to develop and implement new and more creative technological approaches to mobility enhancement as well as provide a "test bed" for concepts not previously utilized in telecenter development. The primary beneficiaries are the residents that commute to jobs out of the City. Because the Telecenters are located close to restaurants, retail services, schools, day care, grocery stores, banking and dry-cleaning services, telecommuters spend money in the community where they live, rather than in far away neighborhoods. Telecenters enhance a user's "quality of life" because people have more time to spend with their family/friends. Telecommuting offers community members the chance to clean our environment by reducing commutes. Residents save money on gas, parking and car maintenance. J:elecommuting benefits employers by increasing productivity levels, decreasing overhead costs and assisting employers in meeting air quality regulations. The primary Telecenter users are local residents in a 1-3 mile radius. The information age has created a new classification of worker in our society referred to as the "information worker". Information works are employed in jobs that require extensive use of the telephone and/or 2Sr? " computer; their physical location has little bearing on their ability to perfonn their jobs, so long as they have access to the data they need. It is these people - data analysts, accountants, sales representatives, customer service representatives, engineers, graphic artist, administrative support workers--who are the primary clients of the telecenter. The City developed a fmancing scheme that other cities should emulate. Chula Vista created partnerships with private business, regional and state government agencies. Because of the uncertainties of governmental financing, government grant opportunities will change over time and would be replicated in the future. Business partnerships will playa more important roJe in the economic vitality of our telecenters. Project developers have been acutely aware of the need to create a dynamic process by which partners will be identified and their participation secured. We understand that, over time, the needs of the community and the users of the site will determine the amount, type and duration of contributions and investment in the facility. Diversification of the telecenter is a strategy that is being used to reduce the telecenter's dependence on telecommuters as the sole clientele. The University of Phoenix is utilizing the telecenter conference room two evenings a week to reach students in the San Diego market, eliminating 3D-minute commutes by 20 students per class. The University is renting space as well. For these services, the telecenter receives $1,500 rent. Our plan is to make the telecenter self-sufficient in three years through utilizing the telecenters as distance learning centers, offering community computer services, such as access to the Internet, access to high level computer equipment at minimal charges. &1510/1 Y'''--~ ----,-~-- ..-..-....----......---- EXPO 2000 International Projects Submission Form Address: City ofChula Vista Telecenter 1550 East H Street, Suite J Chula Vista, CA 91913 1. Name of project: City ofChula Vista Telecenter 2. Short fonn: 3. Organizer of projects: Barbara Bamberger Environmental Resource Manager Mailing address: City ofChula Vista Environmental Division 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Telephone: (619) 691-5296 Fax: (619) 585-5612 E-mail: bbamberger@ci.chula-vista.ca.us 4. Contact person(s): Angie Jarchow Telecenter Director Mailing address: City ofChula Vista Telecenter 1550 East H Street, Suite J Chula Vista, CA 91913 Telephone: (619) 585-5666 Fax: (619) 656-3087 EE-màil: telecenter@ao1.com 5. Type of Organization: City Government Agency 6. Is this project sponsored/financed through 3rd parties? Yes Name(s) of sponsoring organization(s): California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) University of California, Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies California Energy Commission via the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) County of San Diego, Air Pollution Control District Urban Consortium Energy Task Force of Public Technology Inc. (PTI) Cox Communications. 'if> 1 7. To which EXPO 2000 topic does the project relate most: Future of Work 8. Please describe the special contribution of the project to the theme of EXPO 2000 Hannover "Humankind-Nature-Technology" (max. 60 words): Chula Vista will supply information on the successes and failures of operating telecenters. The City is publishing a technology transfer guidebook that introduces telecenters as an alternative mode of transportation. It will assist jurisdictions in developing and implementing a telecenter project The City's telecommuting program ensures that it remains competitive in attracting residents and businesses by keeping up to date on telecommunications technology. 9. Please include information material (e.g.: photo/slide, videotape) 10. Detailed description ofthe project (mu. 1,000 words): '~s a way of organizing work, it (the job) is a social artifact that has outlived its usejùlness. Its demise confronts everyone with unfamiliar risks-and rich opportunities· - Fortune Magazine September 1994. The City of Chula Vista, the second largest city in San Diego County, has a population of 150,000 residents. It is home to one of the country's largest new deveJopment projects. Comprised of 23,500 acres, it may double in size over the next 25 years. The City is grappling with serious traffic, air quality and related environmental issues. Chula Vista has initiated an innovative concept-the ''Neighborhood Telecenter." The Chula Vista Telecenter creates pedestrian-fiiendly, alternative options that can be emulated in the planning process in new and redeveloped communities throughout the County. The ChuIa VISta Telecenter is changing the way people work. Telecenters offer residents innovative alternatives to commuting to work. Telecommuting is achieved by using the ·information highway· (computers, modems, telephones, etc.) versus the ·concrete highway· to accomplish normal work. Telecenters are tools aimed at reducing air pollution, traffic congestion and promoting a better quality of life by providing a workplace close to home. Telecenters can revolutionize the way cities build neighborhoods ITom auto-intensive communities separated ITom the workplace, leveling the playing field for community residents and empJoyers who want access to the information highway but don't have it These telecenters can be integrated as a planning and growth-management tool for all new planned development communities. The ultimate intent is to reduce automobile trips, traffic congestion, energy consumption and air pollution. Additional benefits include improving the quality of lift for commuting worlœrs while enhancing the bottom lines for their employers. ? ---/0 ATTACHMENT 2 Registration Agreement Projects all over the World (International) Betw~n the Gesellschaft zur Vorbereltunl IInd Durchfilhrung der WELTAUSSTEu.uNCi EXP0200D In Hannover mbH. Thurnlthl5trõl5se l.. ~05'9 Hõlnnover. -hereinafter called the EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH- and the City of Chula Ylsb TeIecenter. '550 East H Street, Suite J, Chula Vista, CA 919'3. U. S. A. -hereinafter called the PROJECT ORGANISER ArtIcle , Project Development ,. Both parttes õlgree thõlt the PROJECT shõlll follow the sÌõlges of development proposed by the PROJECT ORGANISER õlnd agreed llpon with EXP02000 GmbH. To that effect, the PROJECT ORGANISER shõlll develop the PROJECT In compliance with the stages of development defined in Annex, of the present Asreement. Initial here: 2- Clty 3· txpo 2000 Hannover 9nbH 4- The achievement by the PROJECT ORGANISER of the stõlBeS of development defined In Annex , is the condition under which the PROJECT will be offidõllly recognlsed by EXPO 2000 GmbH as an "EXPO 2000 Project õlII OVer the World" as mentioned in Article ~ Article a UseflftheLOGO ,. This õlrticle defines the conditions under which the PROJECT ORGANISER may use the logo of EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH (hereinafter referred to õlS lOGO). The LOGO is of great importance for our COrporiltion as a symbol of our company and as ¡¡n economic a55et which is protected under tradem¡¡rk law. For this reason, it is necessary to define precl5ely the conditions under which the LOGO mOlY be used. g> ) / - .- - - 2. Th!! rules concerning the US!! of the LOGO by th!! PIWJECT ORGANISER are as follows: 2.1 The EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH shall grant the PROJECT ORGANISER the right to use the LOGO on travl!l guidl!s. on propl!rty/constructlon signs. at thl! PROJECT location, on information brochures related to the PROJECT itself, but not for advertising or image brochures rl!lated to the Organisation or products of thl! PROJECT ORGANISER. This right shall be granœd free of charge. It Is a non-exclusive and limited right, grantl!d to the PROJECT ORGANISER and not to thl! partners or sponsors of the PROJECT or of the PROJECT ORGANISER, which can be revoked by EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH at any time. 2.2 The scope of this right is limited to the purposes described hereinabove In paragraph (1).The issue of sub-licences or any transfer whatsoever of such rights to corporations. associations, any third party and in particular to the PROJECT ORGANISER's partners or sponsors Is excluded. The PROJECT ORGANISER shall not use any designations which EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH allows its partners/sponsors to use or which might be confused with such designations. Moreovl!r the USI! of the LOGO for COmmercial purpose is excluded. 2·3 When using the LOGO, the PROJECT ORGANISER must comply with the latest version of the EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH Corporate Design Manual which It has been provided with by EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH. Furthermore, when using the LOGO thl! PROJECT ORGANISER must refer In a suitable way that the PROJECT is a ..reglster~ EXPO 2000 Projl!ct all over the World". 24 Thl! LOGO shall be used only in connection with the PROJECT ORGANISER and shall not be used in a way that there Is possible confusion between EXPO 2000 GmbH and the sponsors and/or partners of the PROJECT or of the PROJECT ORGANISER. In particular for information brochures, there shall be no notices on supporters or sponsors on the same page as the LOGO. 2·S Every use of the LOGO is to be agrl!ed In advance with EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH as regards type, scope and design. To slmpilfy this agreeml!nt process, the parties will I!nter Into PROJECT - related agreements. Before information brochures are to be printed, the PROJECT ORGANISER must consult EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH on the use of the LOGO and submit the Information brochures for prior approval. 2.6 If claims for restraint andlor damages are made against the PROJECT ORGANISER by a third party because of use of the lOGO, said PROJECT ORGANISER shall notify EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH without delay. EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH decides if and in which way it shall defend Its interests a¡alnst those cI;alms. EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH will not indemnify the PROJECT ORGANISER for "ny losses or d;amages sustained by such litigation, nor will it pay leg;al expenses of the PROJECT ORGANISER. 2·7 EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH Is the owner of the LOGO. EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH holds the rights of registration/application for the LOGO as mentioned in Annex 2 of this Agreement. EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH does not guarantee that the registrationlapplication of the LOGO mention~ in Annex 2 will always have the same status or will stili be in force during the entire duration of the Agreement EXPO does not guarantee that the use of LOCiO does not violate third party's rights. g>/~ ----~.--,_._--_. ArtIde i Recoanltlon of the PROÆCT In '999. EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH will award the PROJECT the status of a "recognised EXPO 2000 PROJECT all over the World", provided that the PROJECT ORGANISER has actually achll!Ved development of the project as specified In Annex 1 and confirms the same In a written statement to EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH. ArtIcle 4 Pres~..n 1. All projects developed in accordance with this Agreement will be presented in a catalogue and on CD - ROM by EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH. Furthermore, EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH will select and invite some projects to be presented at the World Expositll/n. Should the PROJECT be selected for presentation, the PROJECT ORGANISER shall present a concept for such presentation and further contractual agreement shall be entered Into. 2. Presentation alternatives are: " incorporation in the Thematic Area . participation within natlona' presentation of the PROJECTs country of or/gin In EXPO 2000 " incorporation Into the permanent presentation of an Internationally active organisation which is the organlser of the PROJECT itself or promotes it financially or non-materially or provides advisory services " participation in Global Diall/gue EXP02oo0 (short-term theme events before and during EXPO 2000) ArtIcle 5 Icportlh. system.lnfwm.... 11I11 puIIIIcIty work 1. The PROJECT ORGANISER shall pass on dIrectly to EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH any queries relating to the World Exposition itself and shall positively promote the World Exposition EXPO 2000 Hannover and provide information on participation in the World exposition EXPO 2000 Hannover If neceS5ary. EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH shall make reference to the PROJECT ORGANlSER'S PROJECT. 2. Upon registration and subsequent officlillll!COgnition ilS an "EXPO 2000 Project illI over the World", both parties to the Agreement will aim at organising a suitable event in the PROJECTs country which shall be effective in publicity terms. Details of such an event and Its financing will be agreed separately between the parties to the Agreement 3· The PROJECT ORGANISER shall report on the status of the PROJECT on 30'" June 1998 and 30'" of June '999 in line with EXPO 2000 Hilnnover GmbH requirements, In particular the reports must contain all relevant information concemlng the Indicators of the stages of development as mentioned In Annex 1 of this Agreement If necessary, EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH will supply the PROJECT ORGANISER wIth the requirements concerning the necessary Information. 4- By 31st December 2000, the PROJECT ORGANISER will prepare a final report in the form of a summary. g-/'/) ..- - -----.--- --"-..-- ---^--_...._-~ 5· EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH must be notified of the foliowlng circumshlnces Immediately after they occur or after knowledge thereof is obtained: - major changes relating to the type, .cope and reallsiltlon of the PROJECT. . circumstances jeopardislng the agreed development of the PROJECT. ArtId. , TV and radlD brDucastlnl rl,hts ,. EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH has the right to grant - regòudless of the purpose _ TV and radio broadcasting rights relating to the PROJECT to third parttes and to perform Itself recordings in audio-visual form and use them by seliing them to third parties. 2. If the PROJECT ORGANISER itself plans to grant TV and radio broadcasting rights reiating to the PROJECT or to use recordings it has made Itself, EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH should be consulted in advance. ArtIcle 7 RItIhts of reproduction and publlcatlDn. ,. EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH has the rIght to duplicate, publish and reproduce every document related to the PROJECT and Its development on I!Very type of written documents such as brochures, Qtalogues without limitation in terms of duratIon and location, and has the right to grant sublicense thereof. Furthermore, EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH has the right to present the PROJECT and every documents related to it on, but not limited to CD ROM, Internet. 2. The PROJECT ORGANISER warrants that the documents handed over to EXPO 2000 GmbH are free from proprietary rights of third parties which might Impair their use as mentioned in the present Artlde. ¡j~Ji' --_.~ ArtIcle a. Termination 1. The REGISTRATION AGREEMENT ends on 31st December 2000 without notice of termination being required. 2. The Agreement can be terminated by either party without observing any period of notice for Important caUS!! as defined in Art. 626 of the German Civil Code. In particular, EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH Is entitled to terminate the Asreement without notice if: a. the PROJECT ORGANISE ¡ has deliberately or negligently made false statements with regard to the application for registration as an «EXPO 2000 Project all over the World", unless such statements were of no significance for the decision, or b. the PROJECT ORCiANISER abandons continuation of the PROJECT, or c. the PROJECT ORGANISER discontinues making payments or an application Is filed for the opening of COmposition or bankruptcy proceedings relating to the assets of the PROJECT ORGANISER, or d. the PROJECT ORGANISER has culpably violated major obligations in this Agreement despite being granted an additional period of four weeks to remedy the same or e. the PROJECT ORGANISER has deviated from the regulations concerning the use of the LOGO. ArtIcle ,. "- ma, eun If the OCcurrence of forte majeure leads to interruption of development of the PROJECT, the parties are released from their contractual obligations thereof for the duration of the interruption. If the occurrence of force majeure prevents continuation of the PROJECT completely until 1st June 2000, both partIes are entitled to terminate the Agreement without notice. Damages claims of any kind are not permissible. Each party shall immediately provide the other party with comprehensive information on the circumstances in the event of force majeure. In addItion, both parties will agree on suitable action to reduce damage. Article 9.1 The City reserves the right, upon 30 days written notice to Expo 2~00,.to terminate this agreement without cause. In the event of such term~natlon, neither party shall have further obligations under the terms of.thlS a~reement and each party agrees to take any and all reason~ble steps to dlsassoclate the City from the Project as socn as reasonably posslble. Signature agreeing to Article 9.1 Expo 2000 Hannover GmbH -Project Organizer ¿sr/.} ArtIcle 10. MIKeUaneous ,. If any individual terms in this Agreement are Invalid or impracticable, the legal validity of the rest of the Agreement Is not affected thereby. In such ¡ case, both parties will replace the invalid or impractiable term by a valid or practicable term as close as possible to the financial aim and purpose ofthe original invalid or Impracticable term. I 2. The present Agreement Including Annex " Annex 2 and the letter sent on by EXPO 2000 GmbH constitutes the whole Agreement betwet!n the parties and supersedes all written agreements previously made. No supplementary verbal arrangements have been made. 3· Amendments and supplements must be made in writing in order to be effective. The same applies to any waiver of this written-form requirement. 4- This Agreement together takes effect on the date ofits signature. s· This A¡reement shall be construed and ioverned by Cerman Law. Hannover is the place of jurisdiction. U. iuti - EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH PROJECT ORGANISER ?> /i/ _._--- Annex 1 to the Registration Agreement Projects all over the World (International) PROJECT Strudure 1. PROJECT deKriptlon The city of Chula VIsta, the second largest City In San Diego County, has 150,000 residents. The City Is grappling with serious traffic, air quality, and related environmental Issues. Single vehicle trips are growing twIce as fast as the population. Chula Vim has initiated I concept - the "Nelghbourhood Telecenter", to reduce automobile trips, traffic congestion. energy consumption, and air pollution by offering residents an alternative to commuting to work. The telecenters allow residents to conduct business, go to school through video distlnce learning and provide shlp-o-shore video conferenClng. Since the telecenter opened In 1994, the City has contracted with 4' teleœnter users, resulting In ,81,000 vehicle miles of travel sllved through telecenter uSlge. This translates Into 8,353 gllllons of fuel saved. 2.. States of development JulIe",. · Increase teleœnter cllpaclty utilisation rate from 25% to 30% June ,," · Increase telecenter capacity utilisation rate from 30% to 50% · Reduce vehicle miles travelled and correlated fossil fuel by 25% over current VMT achieved lit telecenter Note; The capacity utilization rate Is a calculation of the number of telecommuting days divided by the product of the number of workstations and. the number of average workdays In I month. The telecenter has nine workstations and uses an average of 20 work days in a month when Capacity rate = .numb~roftele.fommu~nll da~ Number of workstations x number of work days per month The vehicle miles travelled (VMT) Is a calculation of the number miles round trip that the telecerlter user SlIves by driving to the telecenter tIS opposed to driving to his or her main workplace. The average VMT saved for a telecenter user is 40 miles. The fuel savings Is calculated by dividIng VMT reduced by 21·76 (miles' gallon average fuel consumption). ~r// ^~.- - Annex 2 to the Registration Agreement Projects all over the World (International) LOGO Registration º!!rmany 394...00 m I). May '.225 (30. Nov. 2004) 394 00 72'.2 9· Nov. '994 Ar2entine '.~QQ.'r;1 u.a~. 7. MaY'QQ6 (7. May 2006) '.989.711 10. July 1995 Australia !?64.I:;4Q ~. June '395 (21. June 2005) 664-549 21. June '995 Brazil 8'949'00' u.a. 27· Sept '996 Chile 470.,SQ u.a. ~2. Octol:!.er. 'Q9~ (22. October. zo06) 319·16g u.a. 6. Sept '995 Denmark YR oo.S,.,_~ Q. February~ (9· February zo06) VA 04463 '995 '4- June '996 Finland 3692/95 22. June '995 Greece 127528 '3· December. '995 Great Britain 2.024-556 Hong Kong 686Q/1QQ7U.i!..: 28Jun~1995 (28 June 2002) 95/07875 u.a. 28. June 1995 India 670'84 u.a. 26. JulY'996 Indonesia Ireland 168.167·u.a. 26. June '995 (z6 June Z002) 168"76 Israel 99237 u.a. 20. June 1995 Japan 4·02:¡.Q87 u.a. 4 July '997 (4 July 1997) Canada 29°3°-' '3- July '995 lithuanian 95-1994 24- July '995 Malaysia M.exico ~0..:91Q 2J¡. Nov. lQQ6 (z3. Aug. 2003) 536.714 23. August '995 New Ze.aland ~502Q2 u.a. 19., June '.225 250277 u.a. '9· June 1995 Norway T953731/5 16. June '995 Pakistan '31483 u.a. 3'· October '995 Philippines 395133998 27· March '995 Sweden 95107399 22. June '995 Singapore 5688/95 u.a. 23· June '995 South Africa 96/07718 u.a. '9· June '995 South Kor~!! 352:52.0 u.a. I). March 'Q91 (s. March zOO7) 24,8,/95 u.a. 20. June '995 ¿;V"- / ~ ---"-_.._-~ ./ Ta;wa.n. 7,8.6QO U.3. 1. Decem.þer 1q96 131. Nov. 2006) 84050278 u.a. 6. October 1995 Thailand 334-106 u.a. 14- May 1997 Turkey USA 741693425 20. June 1995 International registration 647.379 18 January 1996 IR ML379 18. January 1Qq6 (Egypt, Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Aserbaidschan, Belgium. Bosnien-Hel'2egowina, Bulg.ria, China, France, Italy, Yugoslavia, Kasachstan, Kirglsien. Croatia. Cuba, Latvia. liberia, liechtenstein. luxembourg, Morocco, Macedonia, Moldavia. Monaco. Mongolia, The Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Rumania, Russia. San Marino, Switzerland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sudan, Tadschikistan. Czechoslovakia, Ukraine. Hungary, Usbeklstan, Vietnam, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Belarus) .... g~/7 ATTACHMENT 3 ~t Projects all over the world 1 - projects recommended for registration I -International Selection Commission, July '997- L- I L [ I L L L. l Forfurther information please contact: EXPO 2000 Hannover GmbH - Team Projects all overthe World D-305'9 Hannover Tel.: +49-5,,-8404-'76 (Mrs. Claus) Fax: +49-5,,-8404-440 .. E-mail: claus@exp02ooo.de EXPO internet: http://www.exp02ooo.de - Contents I ntrod ucti on .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of projects recommended for registration, sorted by topics................................................ 3 list of projects recommended for registration, sorted by countries .::....................................... 6 Short descriptions of the projects .............................................................................................. 10 , I Submission form .........................................................................................................................46 I I i , ~ , ì L L ! I '-- . . 1 Projects all over The World Solutions for sustainable development in the 21't century The programme Projects all over the World is one of the pillars of EXPO 2000 Hannover - in addition to the expected participation of 160 countries, a major Culture and Events Programme and the Thematic Area. Through the Programme Projects allover the World ¡ EXPO 2000 will show that on all continents people are already working on practical I solutions for the challenges of the future. World-wide EXPO 2000 is looking for projects , which, under diverse economic, social, cultural and political conditions, get to grips with I problems and contribute to their solutions in an exemplary way. The project content has to , be oriented to the key theme of the World Exposition, "Humankind-Nature-Technology", t.. ! and in particular towards Agenda 21, the action programme for the 21st century signed by 17 countries at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro '992. in a first meeting 73 exemplary projects have been preselected for registration as EXPO 2000 - projects by an international jury chaired by Ricardo Diez Hochleitner, president of the EXPO 2000 International Advisory Board and president of the Club of Rome. Around 250 projects from all corners of the world applied to take part in EXPO 2000. Many of the proposals submitted come from international organisations which whom EXPO 2000 is working close together, in particular from the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ), which on behalf of the German government is responsible for international development policy contributions. The nomination of Projects all over the World does not however finish with the most recent decision of the nine member international jury. Further selection rounds for Projects all over the World registration are also scheduled in '998 and '999. Finally EXPO 2000 will create a unique international network offutµre-oriented solutions and ideas. -- Ld ! l ~ I .; L. : . . \ ..... . - .'.:" t":"" .- 2 The 73 projects recommended for registration -Sorted by topics- HUMANKIND · Children Teaching Children,lsrael · Composting Plant Béjà, Tunesia i · Radyo Timoun, Haiti L ENVIRONMENT ! Banque Populaire du Haut-Rhin, France ¡ · · Conservation-Based Community Development in Southern Africa, Zimbabwe r · Conservation and Development of the Manu Biosphere Reserve, Peru I. Conservation of the Dana Wildlands and Institutional Strengthening, Jordan . . · · Ephemeral Rivers and their catchments, Namibia · Forestry Management and National Environment Protection Programme, ivory Coast · Mamirauá Project (Sociedade Civil Mamirauá), Brazil · Protecting the Tropical forests of Mt. Elgon, Uganda · Regional Forestry Project, Fiji · Restoration of the Waza-Logone Floodplain, Cameroon · Sahel Burkinabe Programme (PSB), Burkina Faso · Saving Animals from Extinction - SAFE, U.K. · Selous Conservation Programme, Tanzania · Sustainable Animal and Range Development Programme in the Communal Areas of Namibia - (SARDEP), Namibia · Sustainable Forestry Management and Utilization in conjunction with the community Chiquitano in , Lomerio, Bolivia , , L · Three-North Shelterbelt Development Programme, China · Tropical Ecoiogy Support Programme, international !' I. NUTRITION .... I · ENDA - Seeds Action Project, Zimbabwe I L · Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Project, Malawi · Integrated Food Security Programme (lFSP) - Shire - Tigray, Ethiopia I ì · Mona Lisa Banana, Honduras <- Promotion of Giant Cane Rat (Agouti) Production, Benin · , · Seeds for Survival, Ethiopia , · SEKEM, Egypt - -'- ..' .. -. - 3 ___ _~._.u_ HEALTH · EMAS - Mobile Well Drilling and Sanitation Schooi, Bolivia · Family Health Management by and for Urban Poor Settlers (FAMUS), Philippines · Healthy Sheffield, U.K. · Living in a Red Day, USA · SMARTRISK Foundation, Canada · TAKIWASI- Drug rehabilitation project and research into traditional Amazon medicines, Peru KNOWLEDGE · Amazon Radio (Friends ofthe Earth International), Brazil · Education for a Sustainable Future (ESF), Canada i · Ethnobotanical Educational Park OMAERE, Ecuador , FUNDAEC, Colombia · · Living Library, Brazil · Personal Power Generation/Radio, South Africa · Programme for the Training of Bilingual Teachers in the Peruvian Amazon, Peru · wrrv - The Global Access Television Network, Canada FUTURE OF WORK · Oujé Bougoumou Cree Nation, Canada [. Arkansas Land and Farm Development Corporation, USA ~. · Banana Kelly, USA · City of Chula Vista Telecenter, USA · Environmental Demands on Purchasing, Sweden i · Greenpoint Manufacturing, USA ~ IDECO-Workshop, Finland · I · PANMAI- Seidenweberei in Isaan, Thailand I · PATH (London) Ltd, U. K. L · Small and Micro Enterprise Project, Egypt I · SOLID ERE, Lebanon , , · The Big Issue, UK ,.- - MOBIUTY · A Living Laboratory for Sustainability, USA · Headstart Transport Awareness Campaign, U.K. · Integrated Transport Network (RIT), Brazil :......:. · Miljøbyen Gamle Oslo - The Environmental City of Old Oslo, Norway ...... " ," ....:.: ..... /. .. - .- 4 ENERGY · Mini Hydro Power Enterprise Project, Indonesia · Promotion of the Use of Renewable Energy Resources, Namibia · Solar Energy Utilisation in Cyprus · Special Energy Programme, Morocco · Wind-Diesel System for Water and Electricity Supply, Fuerteventura, Spain · Zero Emission Brewery, Namibia , , L BASIC NEEDS lj · Ecology and Production of "Algarrobales" - PROSOPIS, Peru · Fog Catcher, Chile r. · Forestry and Farmer Development Programme. Madagascar L · Goreangab Water Reclamation Works, Namibia · Integrated micro-urbanisation and improvement of the habitat. Brazil ¡ · Programme Poverty and Environment in Amazonia - POEMA, Brazil · Protecting the Mangroves of Terraba-Sierpe, Costa Rica · RECA Project - Collective and intensive Afforestation in Acre, Brazil · SOLUX/Small solar lamps for the Third World. Kenya · "Yungas 2000" - Qhana, Bolivia ¡> -. L.· .. .....; I I I. ~ 1- L I ~ ....-. -- .... .: ..:~ 0.: :: ~.: - 5 The 73 projects recommended for registration -sorted by countries- BENIN · Promotion of Giant Cane Rat (Agouti) Production, Nutrition \ BOLIVIA , · Sustainable Forestry Management and Utilization in conjunction with the community Chiquitano in . L.- Lomerio, Environment .' · EMAS - Mobile Well Drilling and Sanitation School, Health t· · ..Yungas 2000" - Qhana, Basic Needs r BRAZIL !. · Mamirauá Project (Sociedade Civil Mamirauá), Environment · Amazon Radio (Friends of the Earth International), Knowledge · Living Library, Knowledge · Integrated Transport Network (RiT), Mobility · Integrated micro-urbanisation and improvement of the habitat, Basic Needs · Programme Poverty and Environment in Amazonia - POEMA, Basic Needs , · RECA Project - Collective and Intensive Afforestation in Acre, Basic Needs BURKINA FASO . . · Sahel Burkinabe Programme (PSB), Environment ,-.. '. CAMEROON .- Restoration of the Waza-Logone Floodplain, Environment · I CANADA i <.,;. SMARTRISK Foundation, Health · !' · Education for a Sustainable Future (ESF), Knowledge L · WITV - The Global Access Television Network, Knowledge · Oujé Bougoumou Cree Nation, Future of Work . CHILE L · Fog Catcher, Basic Needs L . . CHINA · Three-North Shelterbelt Development Programme, Environment - COLOMBIA · FUNDAEC, Knowledge .. COSTA RICA '.' . · Protecting the Mangroves ofTerraba-Sierpe, Basic Needs ..... '. .' - CYPRUS · Solar Energy Utilisation in Cyprus, Energy - - 6 _ ------.-.---.-- ECUADOR · Ethnobotanical Educational Park OMAERE, Knowledge EGYPT · SEKEM, Nutrition · Small and Micro Enterprise Project, Future of Work ETHIOPIA · Integrated Food Security Programme (IFSP) - Shire - Tigray, Nutrition · Seeds for Survival, Nutrition FIJI · Regional Forestry Project, Environment FINLAND · IDECO-Workshop, Future of Work FRANCE · Banque Populaire du Haut-Rhin, Environment HAITI · Radyo Timoun, Humankind HONDURAS · Mona Usa Banana, Nutrition ." .. iNDONESIA · Mini Hydro Power Enterprise Project, Energy INTERNATIONAL - · Tropical Ecology Support Programme, Environment ISRAEl · Children Teaching Children, Humankind ~ IVORY COAST '- · Forestry Management and National Environment Protection Programme, Environment JORDAN - · Conservation of the Dana Wildlands and Institutional Strengthening, Environment KENYA - · SOLUX/Small solar lamps for the Third World, Basic Needs LEBANON - · SOLlDERE, Future of Work .. ....; " MADAGASCAR ..-., .. '- · Forestry and Farmer Development Programme, Basic Needs MALAWI - · Fisheries and Aquaculture Development Project, Nutrition - 7 -- --- USA · Living in a Red Day, Health · Arkansas Land and Farm Development Corporation, Future of Work · Banana Kelly. Future of Work · City of Chula Vista Telecenter, Future of Work · Greenpoint Manufacturing, Future of Work · A Uving Laboratory for Sustainability, Mobility ZIMBABWE · Conservation-Based Community Development in Southern Africa, Environment '-" · ENDA - Seeds Action Project, Nutrition I , l r ¡ -" ¡ , ... ¡" I , " L.. I l, r , '- - 9 - ____u._n.._._."_..__.. i - Promotion of Giant Cane Rat (Al'!outi) Production - Benin Expo topic: Nutrition n Organizer: Ministry of Agriculture, Dept. of Animal Production '1 t·, n Short description: The West African cane rat, a close relative to the porcupine, is actually a wild living animal. As it often invades in rice fields and destroys the yield the rural population hunts it with traps, bushfires and baits. Its meat is considered to be a delicacy and fetches high prices on the local markets. With support of the , j German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) they try to domesticate and to reproduce ..., Agouti. The project supports the maintenance in stables and the breeding of the ;,1 cane rat to create an attractive income source, above all for women and youth in , , villages. For the maintenance a lot of knack, training and expert knowledge is needed. The future Agouti owners are trained in the construction of stables, in "1 the most cost-efficient breeding and tending as possible and are informed of I the dangers of traditional hunting methods. A new lucrative line of production ' I opens to the smallholders, by which they can offset financial shortages (e.g. 1 before the harvest or during the dry season). L .. ..., '.' :j EMAS - Mobile Well Drillinl'! and Sanitation School 1 Bolivia ...:.1 Expo topic: Health ~n Organizer: Action Group Drinking Water and Hospital Chamaca - Bolivia :..I Short description: One major reason for the spreading of infectious diseases in Chamaca is the l strong soiling of the drinking water which arises from the common use of the .. ~. village ponds with the cattle. As a result of this a mobile training place for the :-, job as drinking water specialist was set up. With simple device it is now possible i to equip every family with an own well. Beside the creation of a new profession .J the wells drastically contribute.to the improvement of the hygienic and human conditions and they also slow down the drift to the cities. The job as well builder °1 is very recognised among the population, because it also imparts environment- , , friendly and productive agriculture to them in the long term. ..J . I ~, - "". ~ :1 I ..J - -- Sustainable Forestry Mana~ement and Utilisation in Conjunction with the Community ChiQuitano in Lomerio - Bolivia Expo topic: Environment Organizer: Apoyo para el Campesino-indigena del Oriente Boliviano - Short description: The project supports the Chiquitanos, one of the biggest section of the Indian population in Bolivia, in the sustainable use of their forests. Above all, the Chiquitanos live on tropical subsistence agriculture based on fire clearing. Aim - of the project is to find a way which enables the Indian population to live in harmony with their environment, to diversify their basic food and to consolidate their territory. Till now, the project could already achieve the granting of a - certificate of the forest property management (sello verde) as well as a strengthening of Indian traditions and organizations. The development and realisation of plans for sustainable management, the setting up of tree , , nurseries with national species and exotica I fruit trees, reafforestations with i agro-forestal systems and the development of teaching programmes for ecology are some of the most important activities ofthe project. I J ~ Yun~as 2000 Bolivia Expo topic: Basic Needs Organizer: Centro Educación Popular QHANA Short description: The project supports the farmers of 70 villages in a region affected by conflicts because of the cultivation of coca in a sustainable development process and the development of a viable economy. Through training and communication measures local organizations like trade unions, companies and administration _ under the participation of women - are consolidated to strengthen cultural identity and self-determination. The project wants to support the cultivation of alternative agricultural goods, which should be produced in a' biological way, to guarantee a better sale on the local and international market and to safe Î natural resources. ! ~j . j -, ---_.__...._~. ...' -~,. .'.-.-.-.--- ~--,- ~ Amazon Radio - Brazil n Expo topic: Knowledge Organizer: Friends ofthe Earth International [..., n Short description: The project Amazon Radio develops a communication network to make sustainable development possible also in isolated villages. By means of I, . '. radio engineering products get access to the market, medical aid can ~ be requested, traditional culture is maintained and illegal land occupation can be prevented. Since '99' about '00 of these broadcasting stations were set up, equipped with solar energy, which ~ cover more than '.S Million km2 of the rain forest. The project has founded a maintenance service for the broadcasting services and trains the population in the use of the technical installations. Innovative r, ecological development projects should be included in this network in : future to promote sustainable future development. , '1 , , \ I Integrated micro-urbanisation and improvement ofthe habitat ~ Brazil J ~ Expo topic: Basic Needs -.J Organizer: CEARAH PERI FERIA ~1 Short description: The Brazilian metropolis Fortaleza is a city with 2.S million inhabitants. In more . , than 400 slums live about 540 000 people of which nearly ,60 000 have to I :.:; meet their income from the informal economy sector. One of the biggest ~ problems is the high illiteracy of about 40%. Aim of the project Urban .. Development, which was set up in '99' in a partnership with local authorities, .. .:..:.J citizens' groups and the Technical Institute of Ceara, is to improve the situation ~I of the inhabitants of the slums of Fortaleza through the creation of appropriate I apartments, secure jobs and training. In close cooperation with the inhabitants ...J of the slums, about '000 new apartments were built and 600 steady jobs were ~- ) created since '99'. , , i -' - :..J . -, , 0 --- Integrated Transport Network (RIT) - Brazil Expo topic: Mobility - Organizer: Municipality of Curitiba with the support of Institute for Research and Urban Planning of Curitiba (IPPUC) and municipal transport management agency (URBS) Short description: Curitiba has one of the most efficient mass transport systems in Brazil which has been adopted by other cities in Brazil and abroad. Through the integration of the coordinated transport network in the whole town planning the public transport traffic proved to be exemplary. As road traffic could be reduced the environmental pollution for the city and its inhabitants could also be decreased. -, For the whole system there is only one single "social fare", independent from the distance. Background is that in most cases the longer distances are covered from people with lower income. Subsidised is the cheap fare by people paying 'ì the same price for short distances. I I , ì J living library ..., Brazil , J Expo topic: Knowledge Organizer: Abrinq Foundation for the Rights of Children Short description: "Living Library" aims to make the act of reading and writing an everyday activity for poor children and thereby foster a positive sense of self-esteem and vision of the future. These libraries are being implanted in Community Centres serving children and adolescents living in poor districts on the outskirts of the big cities where acute social problems are concentrated. The project impacts elementary education, families, and teachers in the communities where it is implemented. Moreover, the project accumulates knowledge, ideas, and experiences from a child's point of view: how poor children face the challenges of poverty, illiteracy, and environmental degradation. . I I ..j \ j -, i I , - ------------------- , ~ Mamirauá Proiect - Brazil - Expo topic: Environment Organizer: Sociedad Civil de Mamirauá ' , ::,1 l Short description: This project, realised by the Civil Society Mamirauá, is about to implement a plan for the management of the first conservation area which is cultivated in a sustainable way. The region is 600 km away from Manaus and protects the ~ flooding areas of the Amazonas with the agreement of the local population in the fishing villages. The first phase of the project dealt with the investigation of the natural resources, e.g. fish, to have a scientific basis for the introduction of the management and the use of the natural resources. The most important , thing at the moment is to protect and extend the reservation, to observe the villages with regard to ecological and economical problems and to take ~) measures to increase the living standard of the population. , " ! -, ; Prof!ramme Poverty and Environment in Amazonia POEMA , I Brazil 'l i ~.J Expo topic: Basic Needs .-, Organizer: University of Para - UFPA i J Short description: The main concern ofthe programme Poverty and Environment in Amazonia is to 1:"1 seek and implement concrete solutions for the problems faced by the poorest and most vulnerable groups of society in the urban periphery of Belem. Strategic .i measures in the fields of water supply, sanitation, nutrition, health, education, "1 and agroforestry are undertaken to improve the basic needs of the population : \ of more than 70 communities of the Amazon region. Beside the use of very :1 .-; reasonable, innovative, and efficient technologies also the local knowledge , about nature has its influence on the planning and realisation. The project : integrates different protagonists on governmental, public and entrepreneurial ...J level. "Mercedes Benz do Brazil" supports the project POEMA and finances ,', scientific research on questions of possible industrial use of natural raw , materials and the use of products from natural material for the automobile I , industry. -- , ,-' ---1 .-, j --.J j -,........---.-- - RECA Project - Collective and Intensive Afforestation in Acre - Brazil Expo topic: Basic Needs -, Organizer: Associacào de Pequenhos Agrossilvicultores do Projecto RECA Short description: This project offers smallholders emigrated to the Amazon region an alternative - to conventional agriculture which is one of the main reasons for the destruction of the rain forest ecosystem. After long discussions among 275 concerned families the cultivation of cacao and coffee has been replaced, as far as possible, by sustainable forestry using native trees, The project developed a loan system which helps the families till the first products could be harvested. The repaid loans are used to give them to other families, The project is a model for rural - development and characterised by self-organisation of the population as well as the use of environmental-friendly methods of production, "1 I Sahel Burkinabe Programme (PSB) l Burkina Faso j 1 Organizer: CNGE J Contact Person: Tankoano Michel Phone: 00266-312464 Fax: 00266-316491 Short description: The most important thing of the Sahel programme in Burkina Faso is "Development by self-determination and participation", With support of the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) the project would like speed up the regional rural development, The population's knowledge of use and protection of natural. resources is mobilised with it. The project was started in 1989 and since then remarkable successes have been achieved: In more than 30 sub- regions about 230 men and women have been trained in different fields of " ! agriculture and nature conservation. The women and men of the villages plan .J themselves their development projects. Very important is that the programme 1 upgrades the nomadic cultivation of pastures and involves the nomads in ¡ planning their activities with regard to agriculture and nature conservation. J Here, one succeeded to arrange the different interests which is shown in the - ! local agreements for land use, developed together. .- - Restoration ofthe Waza-Lo~one Floodplain - Cameroon ~. Expo topic: Environment ;".", Organizer: The Government of Cameroon and the University of Leiden, ~: :.: ¡ The Netherlands n Short description: The project in Waza-Logone is special because it relates to a relatively new field ,I in the world of conservation: the field of restoration ecology. Restoration ecology involves understanding the local ecosystems and attempting to re- establish their productivity and diversity once they have been degraded. As more and more ecosystems are destroyed and traditional conservation ~ measures are not applicable there, restoration ecology will become an essential ., technology for the 21st century. r-, I , Education for a Sustainable Future " Canada , ! ~ Expo topic: Knowledge 'I Project Organizer: Learning for a Sustainable Future ] Short Description: The non-governmental organisation (NGO) "Learning for a Sustainable Future" was established in 1991 to facilitate discussion, planning and programming ,-.J focused on reorienting education to prepare citizens to contribute to and ";:'1 participate in the urgent objective of environmental, social, and economic : I sustainability. .J . . The project is committed to integrating the concepts of sustainability education into official policies : and strategies. Networks of people who promote the concept of lifelong :-:1 learning for sustainability shall be established. The Board of Directors includes 1 :..._J representatives offederal and provincial governments, the Canadian Councils of . . Ministers of Education and of the Environment, business and industry, teachers' federations, Native groups and other NGOs. ~ J '--J -. - "..._, - Ouié-Bougoumou Cree Nation - Canada Expo topic: Future of Work - Organizer: Community of Oujé-Bougoumou Short description: For decades, the social, economical, and cultural structures of the Cree-Indians .-. in North Quebec had been endangered and partially destroyed because of intensive mining. For 10 years, a group of Cree-Indians fought for a new village. In 1992, a new Oujé-Bougoumou settlement was founded and offers a good - perspective of the future life to the people. The town planning concept of the famous Indian architect Douglas Cardinal combines cultural traditions of the Indians with modern, environmental-friendly concepts. Traditional sources of , income from arts and craft, hunting and fishing will finance the Oujé- , Bougoumou settlement and offer an ecological future. In addition, ecological tourism shall become a new source of income. Besides, it is the first settlement .--"'1 in North America which has a central heating system using biomass. I I '1 I J SMARTRISK-Foundation Canada ï j Expo topic: Health - Organizer: SMARTRISK-Foundation Short description: In industrial countries like Canada, human and economic costs are considerably increasing because of damages and hurts. The project SMARTRISK motivates youth to respect their own lives and naturally that of others. It encourages indemnity provision technologies and strengthens healthy environment at home, at work and in the local community. The SMARTRISK-Foundation is fundamentally based on 4 programmes: In the programme "Heroes" since 1992 surviving victims of damages report from their experiences. In the radio and newspaper _ì serial "Stupid Line Campaign" the youth is shown how to differentiate between a stupid and a calculablelinsurable risk. SMARTRISK has its .., own on-line service named "Children's Safety Network". In the .J ambassadors' programme of SMARTRISK Canada's most famous aerobatics team as well as Canadian astronauts are presented to show j how it is possible to calculate the risk in dangerous jobs. ¡ ---, I : - WETV- The Global Access Television Network - Canada - Expo topic: Knowledge ;.1 'I Organizer: WETV 1 Short description: WETV is a world-wide television station which offers the following speciality: News of the world and sustainable development are presented in a way that both education and entertainment get the attention they deserve. WETV has - the demand to give a voice to local journalists so that they report themselves on the situation in their country. Like this the viewer get the direct sight from the South. This way the television station contributes to an exchange between -, North and South. ~ Fog Catcher Chile -, · ¡ · Expo topic: Basic Needs - Organizer: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · 'j Short description: The technology to "catch" the fog reminds to over-sized volleyball nets: 75 of . . them were put up in a test region in the north of Chile two meters above the ground, held from two posts each. The fog get caught in the meshes and runs via a drainage system into a 100,000 I collection basin. From that point the water is fed in the water supply system of the village. This simple but efficient method has tradition: In the desert areas of the Kingdom of Oman the leaves of '-.' olive trees and other kinds of trees were used as "fog catcher" to conserve the ~ precious liquid. Canadian and Chilean scientists revived this method to obtain <ì water and combined it with modern technology which is also in other regions '1 ., with comparable climatic conditions simple to use. This "fog catching method" -, was forgotten for a long time. , · - Three-North Shelterbelt Development Programme - China Expo topic: Environment - Organizer: "Three-North" Bureau under the Ministry of Forestry Short description: Because of the increasing desertification the "Three-North" area (north-west, -. north-east and north China) is affected by a strong ecological crisis. Soil and water erosion as well as frequent floodings and droughts are the main problems. Wide areas of agricultural used land are as heavy damaged that the - income of the local farmers are little and instable. The Three-North Shelterbelt Programme is a large-scale development project with which desertification is stopped and the land is made usable again for the local population. The aim is a very varied ecosystem with different kinds of forest which can be used in j different ways. Till now, the forest area could be increased of 4 percent. Thousands of farmers came back and settled again in the "Three-North" area. '] j FUNDAEC - Foundation for the Application and Teaching of Sciences l Colombia l . , Expo topic: Knowledge Project Organizer: Foundation for the Application and Teaching of Sciences (FUNDAEC) ", Short Description: Based on the central idea that traditional educational systems are not applicable to rural inhabitants, the "Foundation for the Application and Teaching of Sciences" (FUNDAEC) sought to create a better adapted educational model for rural areas at a secondary level contented to the rural needs and reality of rural life in Colombia. The Tutorial Learning System (SAT) represented by the "rural universities" has been developed. The project is directed to the requirements of rural life in different ways such as offering flexible study time and no requirement for any special infrastructure to function. Based on the participation of the people, the programme provides access to scientific I , knowledge and enables to produce new knowledge being applicable to their own situation. Started in the 1980s, the SAT project contents a six-year '" programme divided in three levels: Promoter, Practitioner and Bachelor in Rural I Well-Being, each equivalent to two years of the official secondary school .J curriculum. I 1 _I ! - Protecting the Mangroves of Terraba-Sierpe : Costa Rica Expo topic: Basic Needs n t. Organizer: Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza ~ Short description: After a lot of the banana plantations in Costa Rica got unprofitable the workers 'j were forced to live on the riches of the nearby mangrove woods. However, it .. was not known how to sustainable cultivate this valuable ecosystem. Aim of the - project is to protect the unique ecosystem of the mangroves and to , demonstrate the population at the same time that it is an important reservoir to I cover their basic needs. New adjusted technologies reduce the need and the ...., production of charcoal from mangrove wood. Sustainable cultivation of fishing . and crab production motivates the population to protect that ecosystem. Most visible result of the project is the formation of a co-operative for the multiple -1 use of the mangroves: sustainable fishing industry, an ecological tourism park, I sustainable woodworking. From the members ofthat co-operative the children I learn how important this unique ecosystem is for the community; to maintain -, the system the members of the community make sure that new mangroves are planted. .." _I Solar Energy Utilisation -, Cyprus i . ! -=--:) Expo topic: Energy j Organizer: Applied Energy Centre - Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Tourism 1 Short description: This project demonstrates how a simple renewable energy technology can be used to satisfy parts of energy requirements of island societies in an ., . environmental-friendly way. Concerning the development and production of water heaters, operated by solar energy, considerable progresses have been I achieved. At the moment, there are more than 90% of the households, nearly í . 50% of the hotels and other tourist facilities equipped with solar water heaters. , They make up about 4% ofthe national energy balance. ! , -1 " ."oj _J I ----- ----..- - Ethnobotanical Educational Park OMAERE - Ecuador Expo topic: Knowledge .,. Organizer: Fundación OMAERE Short description: The "parque Pedagógico Etnobotánico OMAERE" is situated in the area of Puyo, -, in the Amazon region. It contains of rain forest in different stages of utilisation. The park serves as botanical garden and as centre for research and training. Living plants from the Amazon region are collected, exhibited and used for - protection and spreading. Data base with the flora of the Amazon region and a coliection of ethnobotanical information will be started. This happens together with Indian communities in the surroundings, At the moment, it is worked on a _. programme for teaching different target groups in the management of natural I resources and the infrastructure for eco-tourism is planned. ! '1 ! SEKEM l Egypt ï Expo topic: Nutrition j , Organizer: SEKEM .~ Short description: To produce enough food under environmental-friendly conditions requires the development of innovative solutions. SEKEM, an initiative of companies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs), adjusts methods of organic farming to arid circumstances and introduces them in Egypt. Products, satisfying basic needs of the consumers, are produced like cotton and medicine on the base of medicinal herbs. For the production of their goods SEKEM avoids harmful substances, uses more and more renewable energies and, first of all, packing material which can be recycled. Social and cultural activities are integral part of the project: SEKEM companies use one part of their profit for the maintenance of a SEKEM school, a kindergarten, a medical centre, etc.. -' Î .J 1 I l ..J I I I I _.~.._- ! - Small and Micro Enterprise Proiect - Egypt ~ Expo topic: Future of Work ':i Organizer: Alexandria Business Association (ABA) ~.j n Short descri ption: The project promotes broad-based urban economic growth by providing small :",1 and micro enterprises, which account for over 75% of private non-agricultural I '. employment in Egypt, access to loans and technical assistance. The resulting - business growth has been accompanied by a dramatic increase in employment opportunities among the poor, and the availability of products and services at affordable prices in low-income communities. ...., I i Integrated Food Security Programme (!Em - Shire - Ti2ray Ethiopia ., , Expo topic: Nutrition , i Organizer: Regional Administration Tigray ,.., , Short description: Tigray is one of the poorest regions of Ethiopia. The project, supported by the -_:¡ BMZ focuses on the achievement of sustainable food security. With the support I of the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) a lot of measures were put into , action: in cooperation with the concerned communities appropriate i I technologies are used in agriculture to help about 20,000 smallholders to ,~ '1 provide themselves with. By means of solar cookers the energy supply is "1 improved. A work scheme decreases youth unemployment. Within the scope of local resources management the population fights against soil erosion, recultures the mistreated acreage and plants new trees. Hospitals, health i stations and schools are build. The farmers get credits and food for working programmes. In the course of these activities 150 km country road were built, , 11,5 million tree seedlings were planted, 100 km terraces were built to protect the soil and 10 drinking water stations were set up, which provide about 5.000 people. The project has such a big success that it should be applied now in the whole country. -.' - Seeds for Survival Eth iopia Expo topic: Nutrition Project Organizer: Unitarian Service Committee of Canada Short description: In Ethiopia a programme was initiated in 1988 as partnership project between the Plant Genetic Resource Centre of Ethiopia and the Unitarian Service Committee of Canada with the goal of achieving a secure food supply and improving the livelihood of resource-poor farmers in marginal, stress-prone - areas. Plant genetic resources were endangered from extinction as farmers were forced to eat the seeds which they had stored for future planting seasons. Grain coming in from food aid was displacing traditional varieties. - One major concern of the project is the promotion of indigenous seeds which do not require expensive external inputs such as fertilisers and pesticides guaranteeing diversity of diet, stability of production, reduced pest and disease ì incidence and efficient use of labour. In the Wello region, approximately 1200 j farmers have already shared seeds selected and contractually multiplied. In addition, in-situ gene banks have been successfully established. Besides the ì technical activities, the programme works on the promotion of consumer use of j indigenous seeds, information, public relation and networking. 1 Re~ional Forestry Fidji Expo topic: Environment Organizer: Forestry Department in Fidji and Vanuatu, GTZ Short description: Forest resources are often not used in a sustainable manner what in some cases lead to deforestation and a loss in biodiversity. Together with the forest services of different states in the south pacific area the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) started a regional forest project which should promote the sustainable use of natural forests and the agroforest economy. The project has developed an economical -, profitable method to harvest wood without destroying the natural , , ability of regeneration of trees and other plants. The introduction of J this new technology, which is developed further in cooperation with a I big concern at the moment, could have a positive effect not only on the I environment but also on the job market and the situation of the local j population, especially the women. An important aim ofthe project is to 1 involve the landowners in planning, development and realisation of new management procedures. .' .. . ... ._.M·.'·'·...,_.·_,·_.··,~, ,_. ..____,_,__.....__________'_______ - IDECO-Workshop Finland Expo topic: Future of Work n Organizer: IDECO-Workshop ,. ,. i~ Short description: This project addresses one of the main problems faced by unemployed, :." ~ especially unemployed youth: social exclusion. The Ideco workshops offer both ' .j training and education to encourage the unemployed to improve the quality of ~ their lives. Workshop activities have provided skills to several hundred youth ! and unemployed in the following areas: metal working, household appliance repair, electronics, bicycle repair, woodworking, etc. International development ~ cooperation and environmental concerns are key elements in the IDECO I approach. ~I ! Banque Populaire du Haut-Rhin n ¡ France í . , -., J Expo topic: Environment Organizer: Banque Populaire du Haut-Rhin 1 Short description: The project shows exemplarily how a French bank has developed and implemented a loan system which encourages local small and medium-sized :.j businesses to undertake environmental protection measures. The conditions of -:'\ the "environmental loan" are below the market interest rate. The bank has j implemented its own environmental action plan and is working to encourage J similar programmes for other organisations and companies in other regions and "l European countries. :" ~ , -. J j ¡ : i , I ·1 ¡ f i i J .J , "j J --_.~._- . i - Radyo Timoun - Haiti Expo topic: Humankind Organizer: Aristide Foundation for Democracy Short description: In Haiti, a country with an illiteracy rate between 60 to 70%, radio is the ~ primary source of news and information. There are thousands of children living in the streets of Port- au-Prince, victims of poverty and urbanisation. Radyo Timoun puts a microphone in their hands, literally giving a voice to Haiti's least empowered citizens. The radio station is run by the children - themselves with assistance from adults. The radio is situated in the buildings of "La Fanmai Selavi", a place to go and to live for children living in the streets, founded by the former president Jean- Bertram Aristide. The radio is staffed by a group of about 20 children who have received technical and journalistic training. Those children together with a team offree lancers, also children living in ! the streets, determine the programme of Radyo Timoun which broadcasts news, comments, interviews, music, and culture. The situation of children, and especially of children living in the '1 streets in Haiti, are the centre of this project. ì ¡ Mona Lisa Banana Honduras """1 i Expo topic: Nutrition Organizer: Internationai Network for improvement of Banana and Plantain Short description: Mona Lisa Banana is the result of thirty years research work in Honduras: one sort of bananas which is immune to disease (in most cases fungi) and in contrast to traditional qualities does not need treatment with pesticides (saved costs: about US$ 1,ooo/ha/year). Today this tasty fruit, cultivated above all by Honduran smallholders, is already found in Canadian supermarkets and it could replace in the long run those standard export bananas which are treated with pesticides. .._J . I .J 1 1 , ! - Mini Hydro Power Enterprise Proiect - Indonesia ,..., Expo topic: Energy :1 Organizer: Ministry of Mines and Energy :.J Short description: Through technology transfer with experienced foreign companies local n enterprises, which produce mini hydro power plants, should be supported. By -. -- this regenerative method of energy production with also the right location, ~ ecological consequences of power production can considerably be reduced. The project would like to win local small entrepreneurs and co-operatives for the economical possibilities, opening through the construction of the mini hydro ~ power plants: there is enough water as natural energy source, because of , decentralised power production the rural regions receive stronger autonomy and more equality regarding urban areas. Therefore, the project not only serves -~ environmental interests but also contributes considerably to social and economical development of the rural regions. Within the scope of this project, financed by the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMl) and in charge of the German Technical Cooperation (GTl), more than 30 --, mini hydro power plants were built with a total output of 720 kilowatt. ¡ , ~ ; , ., - , Tropical Ecolol!Y Support Prol!ramme ; International Expo topic: Environment , Organizer: German Technical Cooperation (GTl) ., .' Short description: Tropical forest research, ecological research and small projects of the ":1 environmental sector have priority in the Tropical Ecological Accompanying Programme (TÖB), financed by the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMl). With it the TÖB demonstrates an important link between development cooperation, applied research and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Partners of the TÖB are projects, organisations of the development cooperation, but also universities, institutes, young scientists, native people and German NGOs. They use the research and consultation service of the TÖB. At the same time, it qualifies young native and German scientists who realise investigations on its behalf. _. - - Children Teachine Children - Israel Expo topic: Humankind Organizer: Givat Haviva Institute Short description: In Israel, Jewish and Arab children are taught in different schools. Givat Haviva, the biggest and oldest institution in Israel, supports an understanding between Jewish and Arab children and also brings them together. "Children teaching children" is the success~ul project which is already an integral part of the - curriculum of Israeli schools. Today more than 1200 children from 38 classes of 24 different Jewish and Arab schools take part in the project, set up in 1987. The classes work in pairs, an Arab and a Jewish one. They meet twice a week for -. common lessons where they do topics like "My society: my family, settlement, region" and "My personal, cultural and national identity" as part of the regular lessons. The children look for the topics, which should be discussed, and prepare . , the lessons together with the teachers. An Arab and a Jewish director are together responsible for contents and the realisation ofthe project. ., j Forestry Manaeement and National Environment Protection Pro~ramme Ivory Coast Expo topic: Environment Organizer: SODEFOR (District Office of the National Forest Authority) Short description: At the beginning of the century the Ivory Coast, at the western coast of Africa, was tree-covered at 50%. Today the whole tropical rainforest shrank to 7%. The remaining 43% were sacrificed to the cultivation of coffee and cocoa. Furthermore, the inhabitants were forced to deforest and destroy the forest for a loss of agricultural soil and an increasing population. This programme, on the one hand, would like to maintain and protect the remaining rainforest, but on the other hand come up to the needs of the population. It is not always easy and conflicts are nothing unusual. Only through integration of the people they can be solved. In ,,6 villages SODEFOR developed already, together with the , . population, management plans and contracts for the cultivation of the forest, f up to now. Inhabitants were trained in questions concerning forestry and new -1 income sources have been opened. Like this the motivation of the people, who ! finally have the responsibility for the forest, was strengthened. ! --, ! - Conservation ofthe Dana Wildlands and Institutional Strengthening - Jordan Expo topic: Environment n Organizer: The Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature (RSCN) ~ .: Short description: The conservation of the Dana Wildlands and institutional strengthening project n (Dana Project), born out of the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, has become a ¡: ~ ': ':i model of integrating conservation and development for the Middle East Region. It - demonstrates how poor rural communities in a developing country who live in and around a spectacular natural reserve can be integrated into the reserve's conservation programme and derive social and economic benefits from it. The ~ legal conditions combined with the preservation of flora and fauna are normally . .¡ seen as burden by the people living there as they are against their own interests to survive. An elaborated management plan served as basis for the development ~l of new income sources (e.g. by the harvest of medicinal herbs or the establishment of eco-tourism) through which the nature protection measures , became basis for the development of the local villages. i i j Small solar lamps for the Third World i Kenya -, i Expo topic: Basic Needs ":_: Project Organizer: Hensolex Ltd. I Gilgil :-~ -1 Short Description: Solar light is the only source of light which can be used in regions without electricity production and which does not consume fossil fuel. The substitution " of kerosene lamps by solar lamps can prevent a considerable amount of CO, "..J generation and save fossil resources. The transfer of parts of the production into ::j developing countries causes not only lowest prices for users but shall also transfer basic knowledge and know-how on solar energy. The improvement of lightning after darkness which falls at 6 p.m. in tropical countries, will be a great help especially for all activities regarding education and school. In countries with high kerosene prices the solar lanterns can pay for themselves very quickly. Furthermore, many accidents with kerosene lamps can be avoided. -- - --_._-,_.._"--_._--_.~----- - SOLlDERE - Lebanon Expo topic: Future of Work - Organizer: SOLlDERE Short description: SOLlDERE is the financially strongest society and the showpiece of the .- companies in the Lebanon with about 100,000 shareholders. SOLlDERE was founded by the government Hariri with the aim to rebuild the inner city of Beirut which was completely destroyed in the civil war. The environment, - architectural specialities and the reconstruction of archaeological valuable sites are under special consideration. The reconstruction of Beirut's centre on an area of 1.8 km2 is pushed intensively and professional by SOLlDERE. Not without - reason Beirut and Berlin are compared repeatedly and named as biggest construction sites of the world. -1 , 1 Forestry and Farmer Development Prol!:ramme , ¡ Madagascar -, Basic Needs j Expo topic: Project Organizer: Ministry of Forestry Short Description: The Forestry and Farmer Development Programme (PFDP) started in 1992 and contributes to a community-based land use of the hill slopes in four areas ofthe Highlands of Imerina. Besides measures aimed at increasing agricultural yields in this region and strengthening the socio-organisational capacities of local communities through education and grass-root training, the project is set within the context of sustainable production and a more effective long-term management and of the natural resources. This approach involves the transfer of control over the management and use of resources to the local people. ~J ., ! -. ...~-_.-----_._.._.- ! - Fisheries and Aquaculture Development - Malawi 1 Expo topic: Nutrition Organizer: Malawi Fisheries Department MAG FAD Project Short description: Environmental degradation through inadequate fishing and processing 1 methods may become a great risk for the world most unique freshwater fish '. fauna (more than 1,000 species). The fish resources supply most of the animal -, protein consumed in the country and offer employment opportunities for more than 300,000 people active in the fisheries sector. Meanwhile, 28 beach villages are organized in local fishing groups and obliged to a "management concept" -, for the sustainable use of this important source of food. Part of it is also the development, testing and application of adequate technologies to reduce the risk of decreasing fishing populations, keeping fish in own ponds, fishing --¡ licenses (herewith a limitation) and the renunciation of the haul during the spawn. On a voluntary basis several villages, situated at two other Malawian lakes have taken over this concept. Additionally, the engagement is supported -, by the Malawian government through a broadcast which only deals with the i life, the culture, and the professional consult offishing families. ¡ , ; Special Enerl'1Y Prol'1ramme Morocco Expo topic: Energy Organizer: Development Centre for Renewable Energies ~I Short description: For sustainable development also in Morocco the question of environmental- :' friendly energy production plays a big role. The programme aims to improve the , provision of the rural regions and, at the same time, to save resources by decreasing the consumption offirewood.lt is supported by the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and in charge of the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ). Since 1988 several researches were done on energy demand, saving possibilities and the chances for the use and the extensive spread of renewable energies. Energy and forestry experts effected education campaigns and workshops to mobilise the population. Meanwhile, there are 100 biogas plants in operation in the south of Morocco. Wood saving stoves were developed, tested and sold in cooperation with the women of the region of the "High Atlas". The energy consumption of traditional swimming baths (pools), which used wood as fuel, could be decreased up to so%. In the region of Kenitra'a the rural population gains power by using solar plants which could be installed and maintained by local technicians. - , . -¡ ___. um___ - Ephemeral Rivers and their catchments - Namibia Expo topic: Environment - Organizer: Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Namibia - Short description: The Ephemeral Rivers Project provides an ecological overview of the western catchment areas in an attempt to promote well-coordinated and sustainable development under a dry and variable climate, limited and finite water -- resources, and a rapidly expanding population. It researches and documents in form of maps, videos and books basic information on the resources of Namibia's westward-flowing ephemeral rivers and their catchments. It also shows how ~ people living in this region are currently using them. The effects of historical and i current social and economic policies, laws, and development of these resources and their users are elaborated. The project forms part of Namibia's efforts to .0) reduce land degradation and contributes to Namibia's Programme to Combat I Desertification (NAPCOD). ! -. ¡ 1 ! Goreangab Water Reclamation Works ì Namibia \ .- Expo topic: Basic Needs Project Organizer: Municipality of Windhoek Short Description: Water is an extremely scarce resource in Namibia. The Reclamation Plant has, since its inception in 1968, been a cornerstone in the supply of water to the City of Windhoek. Especially during frequent droughts, it alleviates the shortage of supply from other sources. The plant is an excellent demonstration of what can be achieved by using available technology to supply a basic resource such as water to the end user in a safe and sustainable manner. The plant is only one part of an overall water management strategy based on recycling of water for the City of Windhoek; \ , í oJ I j , - Promotion of the Use of Renewable Energy Resources Namibia ::-, Expo topic: Energy ~···1 Organizer: Ministry of Mines and Energy :.: n Short description: As young independent state Namibia is still very dependent from ::1 energy imports and limited fossil energy sources. However, the land "·1 offers excellent conditions for the use of sun and wind energy. - Therefore, the Namibian Ministry of Mines and Energy, together with the German Government started a programme for the support and use of renewable energy resources in 1994. Priority has the use of solar - energy: Till now, they installed smallest photovoltaic systems in about 100 rural households to secure basic power supply on a purely commercial basis. The solar energy systems are bought by the .-"l households and financed by credits, if necessary. Other technologies , included in the programme are photovoltaic plants for the operation of I municipal drinking water pumps in villages as well as solar energy l systems for the power supply of hospitals and schools in rural regions. At the moment, they investigate the potential of bigger wind energy .1 plants for the power supply in the Namibian coastal region. ""l "., I 'I Sustainable Animal and Range Development Programme in the Communal Areas I (SARDEP) Namibia -, .. . ¡ J Expo topic: Environment ] Project Organizer: Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Rural Development - Short description: Current livestock management systems in the communal farming areas of -I Namibia are, due to high livestock numbers, incompatible with the arid and semi-arid environment and are not sustainable. Erosion and degradation of .. natural grazing land is the result. As there are no blue-print and quick technical '., solutions available for sustainable resource management in those areas, ! SARDEP aims at long term results through human capacity building. Instead of soleiyfocusing on livestock development and range improvement, SARDEP concentrates its limited resources at national level on policy reform and institutional change and on local level at strengthening rural communities and their empowerment. They are seen as the prime movers for sustainable development. Most implementation tasks are not carried out by SARDEP but by , governmental and or private institutions and the communal farmers themselves. ! , :....1 " '1 , :.J - Zero Emission Brewery Namibia "- Expo topic: Energy - Project Organizer: Zero Emission Research Institute (ZERi) Short Descri ption: The company Namibian Breweries demonstrates exemplarily how it is possible -- to integrate industrial waste in the whole production process. Till now, this was to be considered as notfeasible. By efficiently using waste, which can be used in other industry sectors as raw material, a lot of new jobs are created. Through - the prevention of waste and the sustainable use of resources the brewery contributes to sustainable development. The providing of the population is secured in the long-term without having negative impacts on the future -. generation. I , '"j i } Conservation and Development ofthe Manu Biosphere Reserve Peru "l ! Expo topic: Environment -. Organizer: Pro Naturaleza [ Short description: The Manu Biosphere Reserve is the oldest one of jts kind. The project is implementing, through a participatory approach, the management of a biosphere reserve integrating two strategic levels, the support for planning and policy development as well as the promotion of social development based on the sustainable use of natural resources for the benefit of the local population in the buffer zone of the Reserve. With this it is achieved that the population protects the Reserve but at the same time profits from its resources in a responsible way. " \ ¡ -' , ! ) -, I - Drug rehabilitation project and research into traditional Amazon medicines - Peru ::l Expo topic: Health ., Organizer: TAKIWASI Centre ~.j m Short description: The project TAKIWASI develops new concepts of treatment for drug addicts '1 combining traditional Indian medicine with the knowledge of modern medicine. .. ", In a centre, founded in '992, the new therapeutical model is used for drug addicts who can meet there. The centre makes research on medical plants and findings from the Indian knowledge concerning the functions of the brain. It executes information and provision campaigns and also contributes to environmental education on a national and international basis. The centre m J trains future therapists and cultivates a botanical garden with a wide collection of medical plants which are at the disposal of scientists and other visitors for -1 research and information work. The centre also works on alternative concepts I for the cultivation of coca by planting medical plants. I -, I I Ecology and Production of "Algarrobales" -, Peru , i .' -1 Expo topic: Basic Needs , Project Organizer: CEPESER , · J . Short Description: "Algarrobo-EI Papayo" is a farm for experiment on the northern coast of Peru. · , On this farm, research is made in the fields of forestry, agriculture, beekeeping i and livestock breeding, considering the given conditions of this region. In -, addition, the people can learn how to improve their standard of living without , destroying nature. The carob tree (Algarrobo) plays an important role as a great ",'I , variety of products can be obtained from it. With this background, the project -, proposes a management of natural resources according to the Sustainable , Development approach, and one of its main objectives is the establishment of a · J minimum area of "Algarrobo" forest which can support one mean farmer family. improving their standard of living in harmony with the dry forest. -, , ; ! - Programme for the Training of Bilingual Teachers in the Peruvian Amazon - Peru Expo topic: Knowledge .- Project Organizer: Asociación Intertécnica de Desarrollo de la Selva Peruana (AIDESEP) Short Description: The project educates teachers (113 at the moment) with special emphasis on -. women from 12 Indian villages introducing a bilingual curriculum especially integrating traditional culture and knowledge as well as environmental questions. In addition, it works on the further training of Indian teachers - without an official certificate (300) and on the further education of teachers to introduce the newly defined bilingual curriculum (600). Starting with the beginning of education, it is intended to familiarise children with their own values, knowledge and practices. Education is partly taking place in the villages of the pupils under the supervision of professors. The subject of ecology which is part of the education .'--'1 deals with ecological systems of their region, the modifications caused by I human activities and the problems arising for the Indian villages. ¡ ""'1 J j Family Health Management by and for Urban Poor Settlers (FAMUS) ., Philippines .i Expo topic: Health Project Organizer: Ministry of Health Short description: Satisfying basic needs is one prerequisite for sustainable development. Empowerment of community organisations and supporting the national strategy of "giving health back into the hands of the people" are the key issues of the project. The programme, which is presently implemented, includes first aid and emergency services through family health workers. This includes securing the availability of affordable basic medical drugs, development of self- help activities such as growing of medical plants, dissemination of health information, and provision of reproductive health services for safe motherhood and family planning. Local pharmacies are the centre of health care and . ; community development activities. The main focus of activities is directed ¡ ; towards women and children in the urban poor areas. --j 1 ) ì \ -- -- --- _.--.~~- - The wind-up radio - South Africa .:-:1 Expo topic: Knowledge !.I Project Organizer: BayGen Power Company PTY (Ltd.) i.·¡ ~ Short description: The BayGen Power Company constructed a wind up radio which needs no i batteries or electricity. The objective is the generation and storage of light '.' energy by human input. The energy is released controllably and converted into ~ electrical power. The project aims to avoid (battery) waste, to save fossil energy and to support the public awareness for alternative opportunities. The wind up mechanism is also applicable to other electrical instruments. Thus radio - communication will be receivable by all and contributes to communication and information of the world's population. -, . i I Wind-Diesel System for Water and Electricity Supply. Fuerteventura -; Spain , 1 -, Expo topic: Energy í Project Organizer: Instituto Tecnológico de Canarias SA I I Short description: The community of Puerto de la Cruz has a total lack of energy resources and .' drinking water but is situated in an area with strong and constant winds. By .! installing a wind-diesel system for water and electricity supply the situation of ~-, the inhabitants of the village improved tremendously. The project demonstrates . how wind, a renewable, non-polluting, and independent power source "1 "·.1 transformed by means of an advanced technology. can achieve self-supply for a ,71 community avoiding negative impacts on the environment. Drinkable water is j obtained through a sea water desalination plant powered by wind energy. The energy self-supply works by means of a wind-diesel system isolated from the -1 grid. I , .. I ! , .-j -' , " -..) - Environmental Demands on Purchasing in Göteborg - Sweden Expo topic: Future of Work _. Project Organizer: City of Göteborg/Environmental Strategic Office Short Description: Through environmental purchasing, the city of Göteborg proves that a large city with complex structures can contribute to a sustainable development process of the economy combining the objectives of competitiveness and environmental conservation. In '99°, the City of Göteborg decided: "When purchasing, the local - authorities should choose products that are best for the working environment and the world around " This declaration resulted in general us. recommendations which also include bans on specific products. Chosen - products should damage the environment as little as possible, both when they are manufactured and when they are used, should not be harmful to the users, be biologically degradable or recyclable and should not unnecessarily consume cl energy and natural resources. I ì ¡ Selous Conservation Programme ...., Tanzania j ., Expo topic: Environment Organizer: Selous Game Reserve Short description: The Selous Conservation Programme (SCP) aims at safeguarding the existence and ecological integrity of the 45,000 km2 Selous Game Reserve as a conservation area. The Selous Game Reserve contains some of the largest and most important populations of elephants, buffaloes and wild dogs in Africa. Due to its unique ecological importance, the Selous Game Reserve has been designated a World Heritage Site by the United Nations (UN) in '99'. Since then the programme tries to reconcile the "interests" of nature conservation with the needs of the people living in coexistence with wildlife. The development of buffer zones around the reserve, the participation of the local population in the management of the reserve and the legal chance to benefit from its natural . resources are major elements of the approach in the conservation work. The J programme succeeds: The poach decreased. More and more animals come back to the reserve in which no game was seen for years. With the profits gained by 1 the administration of the reserve and the inhabitants of the villages, game can be protected better and better. -, , ì - PANMAI - Thailand ~ Expo topic: Future of Work , Organizer: Appropriate Technology Association ~. :¡ :",\ '""'" Short description: The non-profit organisation Appropriate Technology Association is the ,.J responsible body of the project "Panmai" in the north-east of Thailand. .',1 .-, . . ~ In '995, the organisation began with a project for the support of the ....., local weaver craft with the aim to secure an additional income to the women of the province. The success of the project, about 500 women from 24 villages took part,led in '99' to the foundation of a women co- ....., operative which is called "Panmai". "Panmai" is a business initiative and carries out the purchase and the marketing for the produced goods. Environmental aspects playa very important role in the project. -, I , Compostinl!: Plant Béià i J Tunisia ~ I :. Expo topic: Humankind Organizer: Ministry of Environment and land Use Planning ~ i Short description: The composting plant Béjà is owned by a local initiative of that city in the north- 1 east of Tunisia, its construction was supported by the German Ministry for "'-1 Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). In that plant, which is situated . .i in an old quarry, organic household waste (sludge, agricultural residues) is h com posted and like this 300 to 400 tons of manure are produced which are ~ used for agriculture, afforestation and in nurseries. Especially the region around :ï Béjà suffers from paltriness of the soil which are partly eroded and extraordinarily low-yielding. The manure increases the yields, creates herewith - new income and jobs. By using this organic manure a green space, which nowadays is used from the inhabitants of the city and for excursions, could be laid out and planted. - The composting plant also servès as practical demonstration object station for experiments and model for small composting plants, set up in schools. Here the generation of tomorrow learns why it is so important to separate toxic waste and what is the practical meaning of "Recycling". - ..- - Protecting the Tropical Forests of Mt. Elgon Uganda -. Expo topic: Environment ,- Organizer: Government of Uganda Short description: Mt. Elgon is special because it was one of the first projects in Uganda that -, sought to look at the management of natural resources in conjunction with the needs of the local people. The Mt. Elgon project can serve as an elegant case study in the linkages between socio-economic development and the - environment. The wildlife populations had been severely reduced as a result of hunting and cattle rustling. A link between conserving the forest and assuring the livelihood and cultural integrity of local people was missing. Only by -\ concentrating on this link it was possible to move from conflict to collaboration. ! Formal agreements were made between the local people and the park authorities in two pilot parishes. Local people are thus becoming true 'ì stakeholders in the park. It is only with their consent and participation that the ¡ forest can be conserved. Local people now go into parts of the forest on a trial ! basis to collect bamboo, medicinal herbs and other products at levels that all ì agree will not damage the forest. I .... ! Headstart Transport Awareness Campaign UK Expo topic: Mobility Organizer: Hampshire County Short description: The "Headstart-Campaign" would like to create the awareness that every single person contributes to traffic problems and is therefore also in the situation to help finding a sustainable solution of those. Through enlightenment and information the population should change its behaviour concerning traffic avoiding, use of public transport systems, respectively. In that education campaign the companies, the broad public as well as pupils are involved. ,- Through the reduction of environmental pollution, support of environmental- ¡ friendly transport systems, the raising of awareness, and the involvement of the , ¡ society in this process, the city contributes to sustainable development. -, " ¡ , , ì -¡ , --~_....- i - Healthv Sheffield ~ Great Britain 1 Expo topic: Health t": Organizer: Healthy Sheffield Coordinator t. n Short description: Healthy Sheffield is a "Health for All" initiative whose mission is "to promote ,. and support health in partnership with all social groups in Sheffield, by ,. '.' ;",' eliminating poverty, discrimination, inequalities and other causes of illness, thus ~ creating a healthy, sustainable and equitable city where everyone enjoys the ! best possible environment and quality of life." In local self-aid-organisations health projects are held in the whole city, volunteers are trained and financially ~ backed and the direct cooperation between citizens and local institutions is ! supported. One of the measures is a local organised ambulance service in which · 'j 16 community organisations participate as well as a development programme 'ì forthe 3,000 fellow citizens of the Somali community in Sheffield. I I .~ ! PATH (london) ltd --, UK , I Expo topic: Future of Work -1 Organizer: PATH Ltd. · I · ! " ~, Short description: Since 1986, the project "Social Housing" (PATH) which offers ethnic ""., minorities training to become accountant, surveyor, site manager, 'j property manager or architect. Such a training, in a field where these ..:j minorities are still not enough represented, takes between one and :-:) three years. The project provides the training through a day release ¡ course at college and on-the-job experience. Complementary the -'.1 project offers short courses for groups of trainees with similar .-, backgrounds and who share similar experiences, which means they ! I can learn in an environment of mutual support. Between 95 and 100% .,' of the graduates get a job after the trairiing. '", , .J ..-; ~ " ~J ., ..¡ - The Big Issue United Kingdom Expo topic: Future of Work Project Organizer: The Big Issue Ltd. Short Description: The Big Issue is a magazine sold by homeless people in order to give them a possibility to earn an income and regain their self-esteem. All post-investment profits generated by the magazine are mandated to The Big Issue Foundation which provides support in order to help the socially excluded reintegrate into - society. It supplies a means of gaining an income, and gives the homeless people training and education. The Big Issue has been instrumental in setting up papers in Western and Eastern Europe, South Africa and Australia. The International Network of Street Papers (INSP) was set up in '994. INSP is co- ..- ordinated from the international department of The Big issue. r, 1 , Saving Animals from Extinction '1 \ UK .1 ..., Expo topic: . Environment Organizer: Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust Short description: Many wild living animals are threatened from extinction. Since nearly forty years, the Zoological Garden, Jersey, meanwhile together with the Wildlife Preservation Trust, also Jersey concentrates on the maintenance of the most threatened species. The chosen approach includes different components. The breeding of animals in captivity creates a "genetic security net". The investigation of the threatening factors serves as basis for the restoration of a suitable habitat, if possible. Furthermore, biologists, gamekeeper and attendants get further training in the International Training Centre on Jersey. The main areas of the activities are in Madagascar, the Caribbean, Brazil and North India. ·1 -, ! j . j ~ , i - A livinl'! laboratory for Sustainability - USA ..., Ex po to pic: Mobility ~. i Organizer: City of Chattanooga :.1 ., n Short description: Chattanooga, once one of the most polluted cities of the USA, is today a living '''I example for sustainable development. The city has itself devoted to sustainable "."\ development in the long-term what is visible in different sectors: The city - continues to struggle with sustainability issues such as environmental clean-up and protection, affordable housing, providing family-supporting jobs, application of new technologies and transfer. The electric bus fleet of the city - and also the urban planning and design centre are just two examples for the already achieved successes of the activities of the project organisers. The huge number of activities like the creation of apartments, means of transport and ~. jobs, considering social and environmental aspects, environmental protection and the prevention of waste will also in future contribute to a sustainable development of the city. J , I Anpetu luta Otipi - livinl'! in a Red Day USA ~ i Expo topic: Health , -,"' Project Organizer: Oglala Lakota community -, ".1 "1 Short description: "Anpetu Luta Otipi" is a residential treatment centre for adolescents suffering from alcohol and drug abuse. "Anpetu Luta Otipi (Living in a Red Day)" is a " spiritual, cultural, family-centred healing centre. Based in Pine Ridge Reservation of the Oglala Lakota, it is an advocate for spiritual and cultural identity and pride. Being more than a residential programme, it reaches families and adolescents through radio, newspapers, schools, powwows (traditional Indian celebration), and home visits, giving information about substances and places to go for help. It is successfully reclaiming youth from substance abuse, and giving them a positive self image. Every day begins and ends with burning sage, weed or cedar in and around the facility. Everyday, the grandfather and grandmother spirits are given food and every day begins and ends with blessing. Each staff meeting begins with all participants expressing how they are doing in the Lakota language; and the language is promoted as part of the daily life at Anpetu Luta Otipi. Most of the staff participate in the sweat lodge ceremonies and other ceremonies along with the young people and their families. _J -----_.._...-,---_.~..- - Banana Kelly USA - Expo topic: Future of Work Organizer: Banana Kelly International Short descri ption: About 300 apartment houses in the New York South Bronx were rebuilt or --. renovated, architectural valuable buildings like the Old Bronx Courthouse restored, and hundreds of new jobs and training places created: The list of successes of the New York project "Banana Kelly" is long. Exactly since 20 years, - the inhabitants of the Hunts Point/Longwood in the South Bronx are involved in their citizens' and neighbourhoods' initiative "Banana Kelly". But not a scrap of exhaustion: Still this year the "Banana Kelly Community Learning Centre" for 250 students will be opened. The biggest project of "Banana Kelly" till now, the I first urban paper-recycling plant of the US, which will create about 1,200 new steady jobs, is already in the construction phase. '] \ -, Citv of Chula Vista Telecenter ¡ USA ..., I i Expo topic: Future of Work Organizer: City of Chula Vista Short description: The project offers residents of Chula Vista telecenters as innovative alternatives to commuting to work. The city has two telecenters as prototypes that have been opened for more than one year. Both telecenters have an occupancy rate of 42% with an average of 1.554 vehicle miles saved per month making Chula Vista's telecenters the most successful in the state. The telecenters allow residents to conduct business, go to school through video distance learning and provide ship-o-shore video conferencing. .- . I 1 I .J 1 J \ 1 ____~._______m____·_~··_____ ____ , I - Greenpoint Manufacturinl!: - USA .,.., Expo topic: Future of Work :1 Organizer: Greenpoint Manufacturing Center .. Short descri ption: This non-profit community development corporation is restoring a 19th century n building as the hub of economic growth in a grass roots display of economic ....,. '. development strength. The Greenpoint Center has become the base of ~ operation for a community-oriented industry and arts center which is home to ¡ scores of small- and medium-sized businesses and hosts many talented artists , I and artisans. Currently, 68 tenants and 380 workers are producing high quality furniture, woodwork and art in a cooperative fashion that often combines . i equipment resources and talent to complete job orders. C") ! ! Youth Enterprise ì USA I ì Expo topic: Future of Work j Project Organizer: Arkansas Land and Farm Development Corporation -, Short Description: Limited resource farmers are losing their land and rural communities are J disappearing because people lack the tools and the training to establish sustainable farming systems. Youth have neither the vision nor the motivation ] to work for long range goals and have little involvement in their schools and .:\ local government, believing they are unable to achieve social change. To act against these situations Arkansas Land and Farm Development Corporation '] (ALFDC) was created 1980. As a community organisation working for all rural people, ALFDC' mission is to stem the land loss of limited resource farming families and to encourage alternative farm enterprises. It has initiated several -I autonomous spin-off corporations addressing regional economic and human I development. It has helped to organise co-operatives, to provide technical J assistance, and is conducting a highly successful youth programme in the J Mississippi Delta region of the state. i ¡ , ! J , j .J I .J 1 -~--"---,- .-. - conservation-Based Community Development in Southern Africa - Zimbabwe Expo topic: Environment Organizer: Africa Resources Trust Short description: Until a few years ago wildlife was protected in Zimbabwe by demarcated national reservations. The rurai population, at the border of those reservations, had problems caused by the partiai destruction of the yieid by the animals. Furthermore, they were not allowed to hunt the wildlife, and were excluded from the traditional use of the animal population. Therefore, the people living there did not support the protection measures. The inhabitants of such border regions now manage the wildlife population, outside the reservations, - themselves. controlled hunt means a lucrative income source for that people. They are all together responsible for the sustainable use of the wildlife, profits are shared among the inhabitants of the village, and it is decided together '--1 which means are used and how to spend money. This successful project - in , Zimbabwe known as Campfire - meanwhile serves as model for similar . programmes in many other African states (Botswana, Kenya, Malawi, ~ Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia). , ; ~ i , ENDA - Seeds Action Proiect Zimbabwe Expo topic: Nutrition Organizer: ENDA - Zimbabwe \ Short description: The main interest of the project is the improvement of the promotion and I production of home-grown seeds and its use by the smallholders of the region. Through the project adjusted processing technoiogies were commercialised and new flour products from dry resistant corn were tested. As one result of this project many smallholders could found their own seed production companies. This project is a contribution to ensure nutrition of the smallhoiders and to strengthen local structures. . 1 , ; .J , i .: - Miliøbyen Gamle Oslo - The Environmental City of Old Oslo - Norway Project Organizer: City of Oslo ~. , Contact Person: Per Gregersen '. ¡ [:.j r."1 Short Description: The project will improve the living conditions of the population of the old town :1 of Oslo, promotes a sustainable urban development and makes available assets 1.'. of history, nature, and thriving urban community. Through a transportation and land use planning the traffic is being reduced. A transportation system is also being created that meets agreed environmental standards and promotes movement on foot, by cycle and public transport and which serves housing and ...., commercial development. , , '1 , I -: ! I 1 . -..J Î j i ") 1 .! l I ~ j ~ , ¡ i ; -~-.._..- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEMí Jg-~9fš' MEETING DATE 2/17/98 ITEM TITLE: ResoJution accepting federal Library Services and Technology Act, BuiJding Community Support for California Public Libraries grant funds in the amount of $10,000, appropriating the funds and amending the FY 1997-98 budget. SUBMITTED BY: Library Director~ REVIEWED BY: City ManagerG 1'i)0 Xr (4/5ths Vote: Yes.]LNo_) The California State Library has awarded the Chula Vista PubJic Library $10,000 in federal Library Services and Technology Act, Building Community Support for CaJifornia Public Libraries grant funds. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution and appropriate funds. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Library Board, at its meeting of November 19, 1997 voted to support the Library's application for Building Community Support for California Public Libraries grant funds. (ATTACHMENT A) DISCUSSION Library Staff applied for this grant for the purpose of hiring a professional fund-raising consultant to meet the Library's goal of raising $250,000 for the newJy established "Friends of the Chula Vista Library Endowment Fund" at the San Diego Community Foundation. Council unanimously endorsed a resolution supporting the "Friends of the Chula Vista Library Endowment Fund", which has designated the Chula Vista Library as its recipient, on September 9, 1997. (ATTACHMENT B) The consultant will assist a five member Steering Committee in developing a short-term impJementation plan for fund-raising elements already in progress (i.e. the donor recognition system); and a Jong-range strategic fund-raising plan. The five member steering committee will consist of representatives from the Trustees and Friends as well as Library staff. FISCAL IMPACT: Accepting this grant will provide $10,000 for the Chula Vista Public Library. These funds will be appropriated to account 260-2609. (ATTACHMENT C) ~ ~.~ 9-/ I ~,' , - -- -- ------~~~---,----- RESOLUTION NO. /7Y9r5' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING FEDERAL LIBRARY SERVICES AND TECHNOLOGY ACT, BUILDING COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR CALIFORNIA STATE PUBLIC LIBRARIES GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000, APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS AND AMENDING THE FY 1997-98 BUDGET WHEREAS, the California State Libraries has awarded the Chula vista Public Library $10,000 in Federal Library Services and Technology Act, Building Community Support for California Public Libraries grant funds; and WHEREAS, Library Staff applied for this grant for the purpose of hiring a professional fund-raising consultant to meet the Library's goal of raising $250,000 for the newly established "Friends of the Chula vista Library Endowment Fund" at the San Diego Community Foundation; and WHEREAS, Council unanimously endorsed a resolution supporting the "Friends of the Chula vista Library Endowment Fund", which has designated the Chula vista Library as its recipient, on September 9, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Library Board, at its meeting of November 19, 1997 voted to support the Library's application for Building Community Support for California Public Libraries grant funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby accept Federal Library Services and Technology Act, Building Community Support for California Public Libraries grant funds in the amount of $10,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the FY 1997-98 budget is hereby amended by appropriating $10,000 to Account 260-2609 as follows: 5201 Professional Services $8,700 5212 Printing 500 5218 Postage 300 5398 Other Commodities 500 TOTAL: $10,000 Presented by Approved as to form by David Palmer, Library Director C:\rs\LSTA 9~:L /" ATTACHMENT A Library Board of Trustees - 3 - November 19, 1997 MSUC (Viesca/ Alexander) supported the proposed Library Mission Statement and Goals and Objectives as delineated for FY 1998-99. Trustees then went on to review the Library Board's Goals and Objectives for the FY 1998-99 budget. A fifth goal and an additionaJ objective were added. Goal number 5 would be: Supports the Mission and Goals of the Library system. Objective 5 would be: Reviews and affirms annuaJJy the Mission Statement and Goals of the Library system. MSUC (Alexander/Charett) to approve the Library Board's goals and objectives as amended. B. California State Library Foundation Grant C. Immigrant Grant D. Grandparents Grant MSUC (ViescalValdovinos) The Library Board supports the Library's appJication for these three grants. E. December Meeting Director Palmer requested that the Trustees meet on December 17th to meet with the Library's Facilities Master Plan consultant. Trustees agreed to meet at 4 pm on December 17th. Director Palmer also invited the Trustees to attend any training they see fit on Library Training day. IV. COMMUNICATIONS A. Friends None B. Public Comments Mr. Coye asked about signs for Staff Training. Director Palmer informed him that they would be in place the Saturday after Thanksgiving. He also mentioned that the Cox channel that broadcasts Council meetings also announces civic events on television. He also did not feeJ the tax payers would support additional taxes that would be "banked" for future use. 1-3 -._~ .._"__',,_M..____...._...._____. __~~__."_ ATTACHMENT B RESOLUTION NO. 18772 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FRIENDS OF THE CHULA VISTA LIBRARY DESIGNATED ENDOWMENT FUND AT THE SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION WHEREAS, on August 14, 1997, the Umbrella Board of the Friends of the Chula Vista Library approved the establishment of a Designated Endowment Fund with the San Diego Community Foundation; and WHEREAS, the Board also agreed to donate $15,000 to establish the fund to be called: "The Friends of the Chula Vista Endowment Fund"; and WHEREAS, in establishing the fund, the Friends will designate the Chula Vista Public Library as the beneficiary and the dividends from this fund will be restricted for the acquisition of materials (books, videos, periodicals, software, online information services, etc.); and WHEREAS, these funds must be used to supplement rather than supplant the City's General Fund support for materials. Finally, in establishing the fund, the Umbrella Board has specified that the San Diego Community Foundation may not make any disbursements to the Library prior to the year 2006 or until the fund accumulates $250,000; and WHEREAS, it is recommended to support the creation of identified projects on which to spend these funds and include this documentation in the Library's annual written goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, on August. 27, 1997 the Library Board of Trustees voted to support the Friends' creation of a Designated Endowment Fund with the San Diego Community Foundation. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby support the establishment of a Friends- of the Chula Vista Library Designated Endowment Fund at the San Diego Community Foundation. Presented by Approved as to form by ~~~ Library Director 9~i ________._ _n _ _..____ _ _ __'._,__.__"_",......_,_..__._ _ .." _ ___ ATTACHMENT C Building Community Support for California Public Libraries Budget FY 1998-99 , , I BUDGET ACCOUNT: 260-2609 / I i / f ( í 5201 Professional Services $8,700 5212 Printing 500 5218 Postage 300 5398 Other Commodities 500 TOTAL: $10,000. 9~ ____·___.____n______,___~._~_._____.__._.____,.___~..,__~._~__ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /¿;J Meeting Date 2/17/98 ITEM TITLE: Resolution / f? ð"'J9 Accepting bids and awarding contract to DBX Incorporated, for the Street Light Installation project along "E" Street between Broadway and Fourth Avenue. (TF 249) SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~~Sl)(g (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No..xJ On February 4, 1998, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids from nine (9) electrical contractors for the Street Light Installation project along "E" Street between Broadway and Fourth Avenue. A Jow bid of $40,015 was received from DBX Incorporated. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution accepting bids and awarding contract to DBX Incorporated for the Street Light Installation project along "E" Street between Broadway and Fourth Avenue in the amount of $40,015. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: On February 4, 1998, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids from nine (9) electrical contractors for CIP No. TF249 titled "Installation of Street Lights Project along "E" Street between Broadway and Fourth Avenue". This project was approved and funded in the City's 1996-97 Capital Improvement Program. This project would be accomplished in conjunction with San Diego Gas and Electric Company's Undergrounding project. The work to be done includes the installation of new or relocated street light standards, luminaires, mast arms, new meter pedestal cabinet to service the existing traffic signals at Fifth Avenue and "E" Street and other miscellaneous equipment necessary to make the system operational. The bids received were as follows: Contractor Amount 1. DBX Electric, Inc. - Temecula $40,015 2. Select Electric, Inc. - Spring Valley $41,700 3. Lekos Electric, Inc. - El Cajon $46,050 /¿7 ./ / ~..____ _~_...__.__.___~_.__ ___n_ Page 2, Item_ Meeting Date 2/17/98 4. Sierra Electric - El Cajon $52,589 5. Signal Maintenance - Santee $56,481 6. Golden West Electric - San Diego $59,995 7. HMS Construction - Fallbrook $68,500 8. Trasig Corporation - Chula Vista $78,990 9. 3-D Enterprises. - San Diego $89,220 The low bid of $40,015 for the project was received from DBX Incorporated. The low bid is below the Engineer's estimate of $50,060 by approximately 20%. The Engineer's estimate was based on average bid prices from previously awarded City traffic signal and street lighting projects. The low bid contractor, DBX Incorporated, has completed several projects for the City in the past with favorable performance. DBX Incorporated has met all City requirements for award of contract as set forth in the bid document. The total project cost is $50,000 which includes the $40,015 contract amount, $3,485 for contingencies and $6,500 in staff costs for design, inspection and contract administration. The approved CIP budget for this project is $50,000. There is sufficient funding for the project to proceed with construction. Envirorunental Status The City's Envirorunental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and detennined that the project is exempt for CEQA both under CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b) (3) and Section 15303, Class 3 (new construction or conversion of small structures). Disclosure Statement A copy of the Contractor's disclosure statement is attached as Exhibit" A" . Prevailin¡¡- Walle Statement The source of funding for this project is the Transportation Partnership Fund. Contractors bidding this project were not required to bid based on paying prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under this contract. No special minority or women owned business requirements were necessary as part of the bid documents. Disadvantaged businesses were encouraged to bid through the sending of the "Notice to Contractors" to various minority trade publications. Form of A¡¡-reement The contract will be let on the City's standard Public Works Contract form. The final form will be approved by the City Attorney. If)'- ;L Page 3, Item_ Meeting Date 2/17/98 FISCAL IMPACT: FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount $40,015 B. Contingencies (Approximatelv 10%) $3,485 C. Desilm, Insnection & Administration 6,500 TOTAL $50,000 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION Transportation Partnership Fund - TF249 $50,000 Total funds required for design, inspection and administration include $3,020 in previously expended staff time for design. There are no additional annual maintenance and energy costs associated with this project over what are currently being paid. The source of capital funding for this project is the Transportation Partnership Fund and sufficient funds are available for construction. Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Contractors Disclosure Statement NOT SCANNED File No: 0735-10-TF249 H:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA \TF249.RDJ 16,/3 . -.-..."--.... RESOLUTION NO. /!58'7 7 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO DBX INCORPORATED, FOR THE STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION PROJECT ALONG "E" STREET BETWEEN BROADWAY AND FOURTH AVENUE (TF 249) WHEREAS, on February 4, 1998, the Director of Public Works received the following nine (9) sealed bids from electrical contractors for the Street Light Installation project along "E" Street between Broadway and Fourth Avenue: Contractor Amount 1. DBX Electric, Inc. - TemecuJa $40,015 2. Select Electric, Inc. - Spring Valley $41,700 3. Lekos Electric, Inc. - El Cajon $46,050 4. Sierra Electric - E1 Cajon $52,589 5. Signal Maintenance - Santee $56,481 6. Golden West Electric - San Diego $59,995 7. HMS Construction - Fallbrook $68,500 8. Trasig Corporation - Chula Vista $78,990 9. 3-D Enterprises. - San Diego $89,220 WHEREAS, the low bid of $40,015 for the project was received from DBX Incorporated and is below the Engineer's estimate of $50,060 by approximately 20%; and WHEREAS, the low bid contractor, DBX Incorporated, has completed several projects for the City in the past with favorable performance and has met all City requirements for award of contract as set forth in the bid document; and WHEREAS, the total project cost is $50,000 which includes the $40,015 contract amount, $3,485 for contingencies and $6,500 in staff costs for design, inspection and contract administration; and 1 /¡J-1 WHEREAS, the approved CIP budget for this project is $50,000 and there is sufficient funding for the project to proceed with construction; and WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and determined that the project is exempt for CEQA both under CEQA Guidelines, section 15061 (b) (3) and section 15303, Class 3 (new construction or conversion of small structures). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby accept bids and award the contract to DBX Incorporated in the amount of $40,015, for the street light installation project along "E" Street between Broadway and Fourth Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chu1a vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract on behalf of the City of Chula vista. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt, Director of ttorney Public Works C:lrsIDBX.bid 2 / tJ -c5 - "--_._.~_..__."----_.'--'._----- THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT . You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions on all matters which will require discretionary action on the pan of the City Council, Planning Commission. and all other officiaÍ bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or the Contract e.g., owner. applicant. Contractor. subcontractor, material supplier. . I[)~)() JrìC 2. If any person* identified pursuant to (I) above is a cotpOraùon or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. " ) " rY\ Qo YI(j 3. If any person* idenùfied pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. rì 1 fA.. 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards. Commissions. Committees, and Council within the past twelve month? Yes _ No V'1fyes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please idenùfy each and every person, including any agents, employees. consultants. or independent Contractors who you have assigned to represent you 'before the City in this matter. ,-jìm p~' ;\ CUY\F. " C", P"º--"'¿j 6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the ~gate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council member in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No ~If yes, state which Council members(s): * * * (NOTE: Attached additi ) * * * Date:....;;(} óI} c¡ ð ~ Signature of Contractor/Applicant Jì m Q-¡~ ~ìd.Q(rt Print or type 'of Contractor/Applicant * Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, sodal club, frate/7/LZ1 organization, corporation. estate, trust. receiver, syndicate. this and any other county, dry or country, ciry munidpality, district, or other poliriœl subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit. 14 /tJ~þ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item / / Meeting Date 2/17/98 ITEM TITLE: 11, Resolution Iff:; ¿?~stablishing dates for property owners to be ready to receive underground service and the removal of poles and overhead facilities within Underground Utility District No. 123 Phase 1, along E Street from Broadway to Fourth Avenue ß. Resolution / ð'"'l ð JAuthorizing the expenditure of utility alJocation funds to subsidize private service lateral conversions serving non-single family residential properties within the E Street Underground Utility District No. 123 between Broadway and Toyon Lane SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works()t ~ REVIEWED BY: City ManagerC~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_NoX) f(f ) On October 27, 1992, the City Council heJd a public hearing and approved Resolution No. 16846 establishing Underground UtiJity District No. 123, along E Street, from Broadway to Toyon Lane. This resolution covers the first phase of the district which starts at Broadway and ends at Fourth Ave. In accordance with Section 15.32.150 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Resolution 16846 states that the City Council shall by subsequent resolution set the date upon which affected property owners must be ready to receive underground service and the date by which SDG&E shall remove poles, overhead wires and associated structures. The conversion of overhead utilities to underground within phase 1 is scheduled to be completed July 15, 1998. On December 15, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution 16934 amending City Council Policy #585-01 by expanding the use of SDG&E utility funds to reimburse all affected properties for the cost of undergrounding of private service Jaterals. Prior to the amendment, the policy allowed reimbursement to single family residential properties only. This resolution will enable all affected properties within the district to be reimbursed for the cost of trench work. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolutions to: La. Set March 16, 1998 as the date by which property owners within Underground Utility District No. 123 Phase I, along E Street from Broadway to Fourth Avenue, shall be ready to receive underground services. b. Set July 15, 1998 as the date by which poles, overhead wires and associated structures shall be removed within Underground Utility District No. 123 Phase 1, along E Street from Broadway to Fourth Avenue. /J./ / -.. -"-- -.- ---------.--.----..-." Page 2, Item Meeting Date 2/17/98 2. Authorize the expenditure of utility allocation funds to subsidize private service lateral conversions serving non-single family residential properties within the entire district from Broadway to Toyon Lane. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: On October 27, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 16846 establishing Underground Utility District No. 123, along E Street from Broadway to Toyon Lane. After a meeting of the Utility Undergrounding Advisory Committee (UUAC) on November 12,1997, the utility companies informed Engineering staff that they can meet the following schedule for the underground conversion district: Date for Customers to be ready to receive March 16, 1998 Underground Service Date for the completion of undergrounding July 15, 1998 work and the removal of overhead utilities, poles and associated structures Upon approval of this resolution, notices of these dates will be sent to residents and owners ofreal property within the first phase of the district. Exhibit "A" shows a listing of those property owners. The conversion work by the property owners involves trenching, backfill and installation of conduit from the property line to point of connection. On December 15, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution 16934 amending City Council Policy No. 585-1 expanding the use of SDG&E utility funds to reimburse all property owners for their trench work. The new policy is applicable to all Districts formed in calendar year 1992 and thereafter. Each property owner required to dig a trench for lateral connection will be reimbursed at a rate of$30 per foot of trenching (up to 100'). The City will reimburse each property owner, after receipt of said funds from SDG&E and completion of the building permit process. In the first phase of this district, all property owners required to construct a trench will be reimbursed (20 single family dwellings and 12 non-single family dwellings). The subsidy to single family dwellings is estimated to be $21,600. The estimated subsidy to non-single family dwellings is estimated to be $12,300. Exhibit "B" gives an estimate of the reimbursement to each property owner. The boundary for Phase one of the project is shown on attached Exhibit C. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of pole removal, undergrounding overhead facilities and private property conversion reimbursements as outlined above is estimated to be $1,114,251. SDG&E' s ///;2. Page 3, Item Meeting Date 2/17/98 allocation funds (Rule 20-A) will cover the estimated cost of the project. The estimated subsidy to property owners for their trench work is $33,900. Attachments: Exhibit A - Notification Mailing list NOT SCANNED Exhibit B - List of parcels and property owners qualifYing for reimbursement with an estimate of the reimbursement NOT SCANNEtl1 Exhibit C - Boundary Map of Phase I of the project Copy of Resolution 16846 NOT SCANNED Copy of Resolution 16934 NOT SCANNED File No: 081 0-20-A Y -088 H:\HOMEIENGINEERIADVPLAN\UUDlSnE-sn97 A-CR2. TEA //~ J -~_.--- --. p --- ~ ~g ..... :-'~ tI'Je gi ~ U s; - ~~ - 0 ~ ~ sâ. - ~~ ~~ (þ Z / / -If --.,-..---., ---.-.--..-.---..-....--...-....-..- " a ~N~~~NN~~N~~~~N~~~N~~~~Ntt~N~8~~~~~~~~~·~~~~·~·~··~·~~~..~ ~~~~8~go~~~~~~~ß~~~~$N$~~O~S~ ~~~~~~~~~~æ~~~~~~~~~ ~8~~~~ m>mmmrorommnmmmm~mmmmmmmm~mmmømmmmmmm~mmmmmmrommromrommmmøøømm~ ~ rnrn m ~ 5 ffi c ~ ~ ~ ~ ccc ~ 00 ~ ~ m ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~~~ = ~~ ~ ~ þ 0 ~ ~ »> ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~oooIzroro~m~~mŒo~~~roo~oom~~~oooooømø~øøoOOØI~Ø~~~~~~roø~roo~ro~oî cOCIcømm ÞÞmr>mm~~Oø oøm»mmomzz»>xrm~»~mm>I»oo»~>zmp~ ~~z>rcz~~zz~~zr300Ø~mroo~or~O~~øm~øroo<øoz~o~~ooO~~Ir~>~o~ø^ ~~z~~~~~~~~ð~Q~~~~ ~c~gð~d~^O~c~5ffiozmgooz~oo~~~oo~~oÇ5~~^~~z~ ~~~N<ZO~ rrramo6~~~~~ømr~z~~~O!~~~rnh~~~81~oo~~~~~~~mm~z~z~ ~~~LZ~Z~~O NO ~~ 0 mOO ~^ >0 ç~~ ~ z ZOO ~ ~ -zr ~~nZ ~OrOøO~ >þ OO~~r ~~~~~~ooo~om~ro^~~< I~roro5zro~~B~o~~O~~~öo -; > oo-w ~ I e~ -- ~ ~ ~ m Þ -Þ-- 0 ~- ~~~m~m~~~ð~r>WZ ~~~z~~o~e~~~~$~~O~~~~ooo~mo~~~~z~~m~oo~~~ G ~m~~>~o z~ DZmz ~-ooozro~ z~m~z~o~ m~oo~~OO~~ooQøo~~z ~ø ~~ê~ro~~ ero~~Þ~~ 22g-~omffi~~~~m~~~~Q~ ~~~c~~~~~~m~~~~~O~~ ê~~-~~~ ~~8~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~0~~ozØo ~~~ ~~-~~~~6 ~~~õ~o~~~õ oo~o CZ~ ~ZZ~~~Q 00 c~Q~z ~~mrn~ ~ ~ ~m ømÞÞ~ mcgoz~~~~~ ~o~ ~~ Þ~~~~z~ ~~ ~~z~õ ~~~~m m ~ ~~ ~~~~~ --~oo~ÞC~~ ~ ~~ g ~--~~~~g gg ~~~~~ Þ --g~ ~ ffi Þ~ ê~~~~ ~~8~~~~Æ~ ~ ~ ~ -~~__ 00 ~mþz ~ ž~ ~ ~ 00> oo>~~__ ~ z~~ c>~ -- 0 ~ ~o_ ~~ ~~þm~ ê ooê ~ ~ ~ç 6Ç ~ o$~~oo~~ & _ ~? ee ~ -~- 00 Zoo ~ ooZ ~z ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ çç _ ~ ~~ ~ -- ~- __ ~ e ~<z ~ __« ~ _~ ~ ? Þ 00 ~~o ~ -- ,t? ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~~ e ~~ ~ mß ~ -- ~ 0 ~~c ~ ~~ f ~~ ø ~ ~ ~~~ o -- ~~ ø r 8 z~ ~ >z 00 ~ 000 ~ zoo m ~ - ~~ ? oo~ m ~ ~o ~ ~~ ~ æ ~E þ~ ~ ~ ~> mo 0 ~ Þ~ Z~ ø ~ zoo ooZ = t m~ "'0 ~~ ~ - ~- -z ¡; =r io z ~ = m~ Q ~ ø z~ r ~ . ~~ -- 0 ~~~UI.~~~~~UlUlUI(")~ ··~·i~O~tt·~·Ulo-~~~--.o~.o g;:&o~¡;;Q-Qt:i~~~~Qi ~I"" c:- o~-~~8g g8~m~~g ff~~ ~ògm~~S~~ò~~8 f~~ò~ffiò (")UlUI-~O~OUlo~m-..j0:::s =:!t. wÞO)m(..)tDtDm ommm(..)~ mmmmmm~~m·mQm ø.m~ UI~~~Ulm~ gm~mg:¡5~~m~~:¡;;m~~ =0 ~~;;~~mm~~~~~~~m 00005000000~øoo£00~00~m~00~~~0~~500~ ~~~~G5e~e~x~~~o'" .:!'~ ~Þ:=ô¡=oo .o~.. ·55 ~~m~~~ Þ~m~ ~~~-~ 0 ~ ~ c:'!¡ (..)<m ::¡j~~0< 000 m ôô~ôôô~< ooô~ ~~~ô~~~ffi~~~ô~ ::Eômô~(ñ~~¿(..) ~ôQ> ~ 0 m &:m~~eþ>~m>~~~O~ ~~>~~~m~~~~>~~o~Io~m~~zm~z ~~~~ :¡:; ;¡;;~~0>~~8: i'i >c ..~ez«eoo~eec>~ ee~ccc OC e~e~ e . o~eo eQe . z~c -r¡;¡e ¡: 0~ooÇ>~~ç:1.ÇÇç:uJ » .»>8EÇ~Ç .ç:~~oÇ~~~~~13::E>-ð ~>o~o~~tTiç:ô~.ç:~::: .a~~ EC~<::tIO(')<~o«<r-o ~~2~~~tD>~~~2~ooo~~o~~0~o>~o 1~~~OI>~~Ez2~~ a 0 ::;: ç:>Þ(ñO~~¿¡¡ ~¿¡¡¿¡¡¿¡¡Zo 000<ooÞO~800ç~coos< o~~ee~:::!e~~~~~ ~~c~~~~<~~~e~otTi~~~ç 1>~¿~~ C:IE = I~m~<~ ~ >~ ~ ~ > ~~~> çç>oçÞÞÞOZ ÞÞ>ÞÞÞO¿¡¡>~>ç>~~oo>m ~~~x~>x eÞôÞm":~Ñ>~. >0 oo~cð°m~~o~<oo~~rJ¡ oo<ooo~~o~os(')~wo(')~:¡:;~ -~co~ ç~~~Ô~þ;j~~~s~qJ 8:CD = ~Þ~~Oøoo~~¿¡¡~~-~~ ~~¿¡¡~~~~>~~~oo~~~~~ºrnÞo ~~~~ s- --E~zo->:::!~-i ~ ~ o~~ ffi~~ ~~ 00 ~ m~ Z ~ rn(..)~ =<!Þ~ffi .0 . 00 ::tI çOOI OOÞ C ~. ~-> ~oo ~o ~m o ~- ~ 0 ~ê~ ç~-8 ç~ ç ~ r >ffie þZo ~ ¡¡;-go ~ :;::~~ ~~ 8 ~ ô 0 ~ ~~~ -- 0 0 0 > ~ ss:ø~ --~> ~ - -. o 0 oozo~ 0- ~ :!. ~ - " ~ þ ~ZÞ > ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~O» ~ ~ ~ " ~ - ~~o -- ç ç ~ oo~~ ~ 13 z _o~ 0 0 ~8! ç; ° ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . -- m . ~ z '" " 0 to - I X W » 0 m c: N " m ~ ~ & " " 0 ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 z » '" º " ~ ~ !: ø o i" ~ m '" " " ~g:g:~~~g:g:~g:g:~g:g:g: g:g:UlUlUlUlUI~ggg:g:g:g:g:g:g:g:g:g:g:g:g:g:~g: :¡;:¡;"''''~:¡;:;;:;;:;;:;;:;;:;;:;;:;;» ~-..j""""""""'''''''''''''-' '''''''''-' '''''''''-' ~~~§§~~ooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~r¿;~~ ~~~~~~~~~~:3~~~~ ===~~~~~~-~...~~~~~~~~~~~8 ( )øO)O)O)a>.....CD8............m~ ~~~~~~~è~èo~ooo ~~~ooo~~~~§ooo~~~~~~(..)~~~~~ ==~~~8~8 ~ß~~~ -~~~8§ ~~"'8 (..)~- 8888888888 8g8g8888g8888 8 ~8(..)8-, ~""'~8g,:~8~· 8888 oggoggg8 8 8 8888 08088 " ~~ <:"''' 0 ~ '" " " ~ " ¡g~8 I ;¡;¡~ z°» r » 3 ~ r '¡; "'''' o~~ ;¡; -< -< > ""0: 0 ~~ '" '" » ",00: "U "'''' ....~~ ~ '" '" 0 < " " 3:;oom ~ 1010 "''''0 '" m m z ¡;; I c: rmz ~~~ m ~ m ~ '" c: ~ ~~ m N » > eÇ;U ~ (ñ¿¡¡ O=Þ 10 m m r » ~'" 0 ~~ "'~"U » » "U "U » » Im '" "" (ñõ1~ » ~ "U '" ~ "U "U m", ~-;<oo '" ~ m '" ~ ~ ~< II r" ~ '" '" in '" '" zm c:c: c:_ " 0. 0. "'''' ",. '" '" " ,," "" m;; m c: c: I I» II z 0 c:" " ~ z z 0 t '" ::¡ ::¡ r ",'õ ~ '" '" "" N I~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 0 '" ~ ~ » " ~ r r m ! " ~ " " t .. .. '" " " 0 ~ ! ))~1 -.-.-- ..--.....--" Exhibit "B" List of estimated reimbursement within Phase 1 of Utility Undergroundlng District No. 123 Reimbursement Property Address OWN NAME $0 502 E Traffic 519 $600 192 Brightwood LERMA DOMINIC P&PAMELA lì $1,200 466 E GALLIGAN FAMILY TRUST 11-15-90\ $0 462 E SCOTT GERALD D&CARLENE JI $0 204 ELDER BOWERS OLGA D\ $0 470 E OGIER ROBYN RI $1,350 456 E ESCOBEDO JOSE F&CYNTHIA AI $0 434 E SEVERSIKE JEANINEI $0 203 GUAVA BECK RICHARD F&BETTY A TRUST 07-25-941 $0 420 E CORDOVA BONNIE C TRI $0 205 FIG REYNOLDS DANIEL T&MYLENE MI $0 446 E MADRIGAL RUBEN L&NICOLASAI $0 440 E WALTON ROBERT CI $600 206 FIFTH DELGADO-LYNN MARGARElì $900 560 E HULSE VIRGINIA B TRUST 09-10-871 $750 206 BEECH NGUYEN JOSEPH&L YNNI $600 205 BEECH BENSTON MARDELL LI $600 204 ASH DOPPLER DALE J&RAMONAI $750 568 E DUNN FAMILY TRUST 05-25-951 $1,050 564 E CHAVEZ ROBERT XI $750 540 E BETITA MARSI $900 516 E REYNOLDS HILDRED L TRUST 05-921 $750 512 E ELKERTON DIANA A TRUST 05-10-951 $900 506 E SANCHEZ RUBEN&ELEANORI $900 534 E ZAMBRANA MANUEL&MARY FAMILY TRUST 06-20-951 $600 206 CEDAR BANDAL MARIO&BRENDAI $750 520 E RANGEL RAMIRO&CONCEPCIONI $1,500 194 FIFTH DIXON JONATHAN&GRETHEL SI $2,700 435 E BRANNEN RICHARD L&LlGIA R TRUST OF 1990\ $0 189 BRIGHTWOO FARRIS M MADGE TRUST 06-27-90\ $1,350 489 E TAMER ANNIE T LIVING TRUST 04-20-941 $1,800 507 E SASHER RANDY G&KIMBERL Y T'HWJT#RIGGS BERNARD G III&NANC $900 509 E TAYLOR LAVON RI $1,350 485 E FAST LIVING TRUST 01-10-90\ $1,050 475 E LERMA DOMINIC P&PAMELA lì $0 187 GUAVA BERGAN ROBERT W&MARGARET V TRS·SMNS1/2#BERGAN BRADLEY $1,050 421 E GALLARDO FEDERICO F&CONCHITA C FAMILY TRUST 05-17-941 $1,350 195 GUAVA CAMPBELL DON L&PATRICIA AI $0 188 BRIGHTWOO THIO SHIRLEY TRI $750 479 E HANN DOLORES MI $0 196 GUAVA FINCK BUFORD 0 FAMILY TRUST 12-15'951 $0 443E TAYLOR IRA W&ROSINA M TRSI $900 445 E BISHOP RUTH G TR (DCSD)I $900 545 E OLIVE APT L PI $0 529 E DESOUZA JOSE L&BERTHA S TRSI $900 585 E SNELL FA MIL Y REVOCABLE TRUST 10-02-92·NSNS5/80#JOHNSON CH $900 553 E SABO ESTHER C TRI $0 525 E GROSSENBACHER PIERRE-ALAINI $1,200 519 E GROSSENBACHER PIERRE-ALAINI $0 407 E ORKIN INCI $0 400 E SEABROOK KATHRINE TRI $0 593 E ENGLISH WALTER G EST OF·NSNS1t4#BAUMAN STACIA B·NSNS1t4#E $450 584 E MURPHY FAMILY TRUSlì $450 471 E PARSLEY CONSTANCEI $0 494 E FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CHULA VISTAI $450 484 E FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CHULA VISTAI $0 497 E PILGRIM EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF CHULA VISTAI $33,900 ../ /J./Þ _._-~._._..._--_._--...-.----. RESOLUTION NO. 16846 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 123 ALONG "E" STREET FROM BROADWAY TO TOYON LANE INCLUDING TOYON LANE, CORTE HELENA AVENUE, AND GUAVA AVENUE (CANDY CANE LANE) AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF ALLOCATION FUNDS TO SUBSIDIZE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SERVICE LATERAL CONVERSIONS The Ci ty Counci 1 of the City of Chu 1 a Vi sta does hereby resolve as fo 11 ows: WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 16764, a public hearing was called for 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, the 20th day of October, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City of Chula Vista at 276 Fourth Avenue in said City, to ascertain whether the public health, safety or welfare requires the removal of poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures and the underground installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric, cOlllllunication or similar or associated service within that certain area of the City more particularly described as follows: All that property along "E" Street from Broadway to Toyon Lane including Toyon Lane, Corte Helena Avenue and Guava Avenue (Candy Cane Lane) and enclosed within the boundary as shown on the plat attached hereto as Attachment "A" of subject Underground Utility - Di stri ct. and, WHEREAS, notice of such hearing has been given to all affected ~roperty owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, and to the utility companies concerned in the manner and for the time required by law; and, WHEREAS, such hearing has been duly and regularly held, and all persons interested have been given an opportunity to be heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby finds and determines that the public health, safety and welfare requires the removal of poles, overhead wires and associated structures, and the underground installation of wi res and facilities for supplying electric, cOlllllunication or similar associated services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above-described area is hereby declared an Underground Utility District, and is designated as such in the City of Chula Vista. Attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by reference is a map delineating the boundaries of said District, and attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is a listing, by parcel numbers of parcels included within the di stri ct. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council shall, at a subsequent meeting, by subsequent resolution, notice of which shall be provided to all affected property owners, fix the date on which affected property owners must be ready to receive µ~derground service, and does hereby order the removal of all .. . -. ))/ ? Resolution No. 16846 Page 2 ~ poles, 'overhead wires and associated overhead structures and the underground installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric, communication or similar associated service within said Underground Utility District as of such date. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to notify all affected utilities and all persons owning real property within said Underground Utility District of the adoption of this resolution within fifteen days after the date of said adoption. Said City Clerk shall further notify said property owners of the necessity that, if they or any person occupying such property desires to continue to receive electric, communication or other similar or associ ated servi ce, they, or such occupant shall, by the date fi xed in a subsequent resolution provide all necessary facility changes on their premises so as to receive such service from the lines of the supplying utility or utilities at a new location, subject to the applicable rules, regulations and tariffs of the respective utility or utilities on file with the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California as of the date -of adoption of this resolution. Such notification shall be made by mailing a copy of this resolution to affected property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to the affected utility companies. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby finds that the Underground Utility District herein created is in the general public interest for the following reasons: 1. "E" Street is a major east/west thoroughfare connecting I-80S and 1-5 in ,:--- the northern portion of Chula Vista. "E" Street also passes through and - provides access to the central business dis~rict. The undergrounding of existing overhead utilities will contri Þute to the creation of an aestheticaly pleasing central business district. 2. "E" Street is classified as a Class 1 Collector street. 3. The City will use SDG&E allocation funds based on Rule 20-A Distribution Formula to fund this project. 4. Undergrounding has been completed on "E" Street west of Broadway and east of Toyon Lane thus making the proposed district a link between two undergrounded sections. 5. Undergrounding will eliminate an overhead line on Chula Vista's well known Candy Cane Lane. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the expenditure of $81,000 of allocation funds to subsidize 77 single-family residential service lateral conversions is hereby authorized. / Presented by µ/i -, - Jßhn P. liPPi~ ~ Bruce H. Boogaard ¡/- Director of Public Works Ci ty Attorney Resolution No. 16846 Page 3 ~ ; I j¡.¡ ~=i~~~r~:":':" . ~ n -F [CÞ: .' III .. ... CÞ : CÞ - -f ¡ I, ... - .. -f -f ::0- .. · ~: ¡_ [::o~ . LJEr .. L ! - m Em , '. m ... &. n ~ ~, . "·l~.!S ' -f ~ II ~. . ~. '" N ~ .... - r- -I.a! j:rn ;¡:~B- =. ". '" o FIFTH. AVE -t..,¡.;: - - - ~.' ., . c: . . ,"",' ,.... z-- . . ð c aJ~-- ',,"~ ' - "Y Ie'" ., '. -.:". -- . .... . . , " . . ~~-.. ~. '. ...... :,.. j ª~ I .' .... ,¡.,'. . a< .... ':' .;: ... . 'c":',.-. - III - ....... -E .,.., . --:'"-' ¡. . r-~; ::..~ :::.. :: ~ II L .., :,,~7F' .. ., ~,. ~ ...,.. CI .. - '. _' '. ... . ' ',.' .... -t. . '" . -'I' . .. ~ -< . "." ':.. f " .' -';' ". Z I 0 '. I:r I- 'I.;> G) ...,g /~ !If . .. .-. .< c ' g - m : ~ . ..L"': ~ : I~ :Þ:.' . -J.- ~ '- ,.. :II III:xI ,.,. - IL C ~ i~ ~- r-- ~ ~ (j) : THIRD AVE. . ,. È.,., . .,.. ~ ~ I . : ~., ..-1 ~, ')( I : :xIm3~~G] ~. .~.. r S z .0)( ". ,. _. _ ~ - C % . . -"1 .. ..; · _ Z ãi .::::::.-.. .., . '. ¡ ~ 5!:¡ 1ìß:W"'IÔakii ,aE i i ~ ~> SEe.~D AVE1:bJ":~'hl" ; ~. . .. .;;. 5 .. .. .... ~1~~ï¡:,"111111I1111 I,.L... ø -c 0 .' .. ",. "' '11!.t; c: _ . . -' ,... %-()- '- ~ . . . m .... c Z .. ,. ., ,,, I > ~ 0 1. ~ · ~ -t ;:;.. . <m::o · :::; - . . .. .. ,... ;::; m <II ¡ ~ æ 3.FIRST AVEWi: ;.g::¡'!;±.. ~~~," . Ii 0 nlê!2" ,~.." r-~~ m.' -c.... . .,...;¡;; ...: :.=><'" ..J, .. · 0 .,,':;:' =. () 0="'" . r- ~ z. I :: "'=.= m~: ~~ . .. Z ....... .' J=~":: , - ¡:: ~ æ!=> ~~I~~T~~~R~" ~ =~~. .' i ~ ~ ;¡ ¡¡; ~'+ 12¡:.~ ~ II. ~~ e w .~J 1'-. :" A ~ '- ~ //-7 .~.._...__.- Resolution No. 16846 Page 4 .~ noun ... II/'Im T IIIHI CIIf"",.. IIStllel .. In .... . IIKIf ".m _mum ... ... e. m. HI. ilL _II -.. IT!lITln '"'/1 -. .... . __'s_a an, nl'll, "' e. '" IIHM·J'. N' .....1. " I , , )5'''''M .".I.'lli"'" IIlIftlþlllcr... III IIfa, CI.tll'" ." '" "1-1"'Jp... '" TI'. " · , , II'II"H .""'(MUIl1lnl In"'II. au."n. ø. '111I '" .n "HW-U-ø In TSI. " I , , J5'fll'M! ...., 4 "f' mOl"~'. _''IIIa,a..'I'I' III .. ""81,",. II' WI' IUS If. " I I , 15'/1ltn ".ICIII'I11I ....~n. "'''811, CI.UTI! '"~ ,. ""'''-n-" ,,, TIT, " I · , 15''''151 .tlCIIJI"."'\'IIS1 ...... flJ '.n·....ct..n. '" ,. 1It·""-.·.. ., ."1T. " I , , ft',.,,, "'Clll'll M·f·IU......... "'nTi.a.'1t1! 'H ." ....,w·)'·" .. lRIItu. " · · , J!''''ßI .......1..., ""'1'1I. ..",n.a.."", III .. "'·MI·..... g, TIT. " I , , "'nm "'t . "'UM .ern lliTIT. ."nTi.c..""' I. uo ...·nl·n.... .., 'f'.I. " , I , II'"... ""I I 1n£S1t& ÞIII "'-f·SI. .""Ii.Ci.t1'11 .11 'II "·151·11.. '" "f·SI. " I · "'/11M! -.s'''I'II''II ..... In. ØlU .tsn. a. "'I' '" .. "·ftl'I'" .11 "('11. " , I , n''''M ftllS.....'IIIU.. "'·f·IT. .'"Ita.Ct.'I''' I. .. ..·ftH'.... ,. '('11. I! · I , IS''''M ... 'lfllth .... tIS·".øt. a'-'I tin. CI. ,,'" In '. ...·m-IHe '" "11. I! I , , .'/1," PIS'-..s lII·f·11. ."lIfa.O.'ftll "' "' "'-ut-I'" lit "r II. " · , , a·/lw. -. .tIC..", till' .."(. II. ""rlTa.a."," II' ,. ....·n.... 'H "111". " I , , .·/lDO lIl'.....' ....~lII1t.. urnl.. tI.. - ... ., ...·",·u.. H' 'lIS'''. I! I , , ..,"" ......·"'."t" If' '.'Ir(. "'1m.a.'ftll "' "' ...."'-11... .. "1 KI" at. " I , , .'/1'" IICIt"N .. IIITf K¡flt a". _a'lua,CI.tt',. '" "' ...·"..,HI too "'l 1m.. at. I! , , , 1S·...'y ,,"". _ elMttn .....l( IU" .n. IIIILI'lIt'.I:I,tI'lI ., '" ".."Iots-t. 1M .'1 .lf14 ". " I I , fl',,," ..... . _III ItCIILff . CIIIf au. 'n. ."RI'.CI.IT,q 1M '" "'-"I·W'" III _n.t(..... " I , , IS'II'" ."'llImUlIS IItCll1(lm...t(. ."IIU. Ct. "'" ., I. ....."HHt m _naif"". " I , , "'IIJWI -.....,... IBcanauIIHf. CIIl"llIa,Ct.tI'" I. '" "H'I.'''', III CII'fIlUII'f. I! · I , n·/tu. _"l'-.. .. &liT¡ au.. 'r(. IIIIlI'n".a.'"1t "' '" ...·"'·11... III CIIIIKU"". " 1 I , 1I·,m. ..., . ,... 'UII tlJ'antaullm. "'RI'.CI.tI". ,. .. ....."H'.... H' C1111IIfUII". I! I !I'/tIlH flllleII'lmtlllll "'..ttat,..t(. ... 'n.... ct. ",.. III .. 1If-"'..... II ·f'SI. " I I , 15'''1'" -. . ".1" tI.ll'" ""'1. ""'".CI.II''' ,. III 1I''''1-Ir.. .. IA ". I! , . a'". MU . ... "tn III "'tE. CItI"II".a..tI'" .. m II''''J''''·.. III "11. " , , , ..,,'" -'''..m_ .', KUtT 11I1' . "1ft. ". ."' I. I. IIJ"'J-fr.. ... T11. I! I . , .·1ft0ll """IDlltl "TS1. IIIILI'D.ct.'''" IN ,to ..'...H..... .. ·f·ST. I! I , , .·"toe 111I5111&.III.Sf ...nUl...... ...... ... .... "' H' ..'-teN..... IN .(CI.f. II I , , .·lItDO .m . ..." PlU .. .rø.". ,1IIIl.,nla,Þ.tT.1t III H' III...'...... It! .(tI'f. II I I , .·1''" WflU ( MIS" lII.fCl.ft. CIIt'tll". CI. tI", "' .. "'''II'''J-'' .. T11. " I , , .'11," "tSllm..-".. .'n . "I ......n SlfTS1. CIIU 'RU, Þ. '"11 "' m '''..."...,." ,. ·f·IT. " 1 , "',,'St ..". , 0(111 _nn u.,' II. 1IIII."IU',CI.'''1t "' IN "J"'"",, III CfN' u. II I , , IS'/I"t "CIIU ......u"."þ till fIIQtltlft. CIIt. fUll. Þ. "'It IN "' II'..."...S.. ,. "f'I1. II I , , Ii'I"lI -....". "'TII. CIIUtllll.C'. 'ltl, '" I. 1f'·'ft"HC '" '(·S1. II I , .·'m' In.,, L __tn "'·(·n. _t, "ua. CI. "'11 I. ~- "' "'·III·'H' '" 't·ST. " I I ."'901 'IW'fLIf11D1 "'·(·S1. .'flllI.CI.'"'' tit , 'H II''''''..,·. ., ·f'SI. II I , , .'1'''' .. . ru.. Slltll:l ""flLI."ll. .111, ". II., 'H '" '''...n-ll-IC III flrnu. " I I , an,. 1llUl!1.LM tit" U.... II. lit lire. t&.IlU' '" '" "'...n..'.... ." TSI. II I' !I'III'" 1(ftQr.-(Un '" "' III-In"'l-. .. ·rlT. " I , , """'" IILUCII '11m IM1 ... "t. " ~rm'.Cl.IIII' '" III "''''1''''''' <II ·('11. II I , , II'IIUII _tlf.LOtl ....ßCllr. f1ITIT. _I"IS".Þ.II." '" '" "''''J''' '1f ,,, TIT. II I , , "''''iI _If , .'un .,,. 'If '(' II. .'flSlI,a."". h' ,,, .....'H'-II '" lltatu. II I I , n·,m. IDJII I 1111.51111 "'Tri. IIIIU'"".CI. It'" '0' '" 1I"'''''t... lit RCOItu. " I · , ß'my .,ft . þllC:l lit S(œtI "I- ."ISII.CI.'It'. ,,, ,,, ..,..,.~-" '" TI'. II I , , lIfïulIII .lttIIIIl.IUI '"TST. _UfllU.Þ.'ltl' '" '" Ht-,It-.,.. "' ·f·11. II , · , ""mllt "IL"~ "... .n....IDIT. CIII""II.Þ.,nlf '" III ..HI.·..-. 011 Tit. II I , , ."UIDI '01"''''. H'TST. _1.1 '"11. Þ.'I.II III III .....,1..'-11 "' ·('SI. II I , C .·IItee P'IIfDll(·'.ICIT 1"'f' 11. .'''SII.Ø ",1' III "' "'-II''''-If "' ·f'II. II I , , It'mil llll '''T1.U 1I'·f·". _U'nll.CI.tt'lI ". III "'·NHH' .. ·r 11. S! I , , IS·I.m ... '1111I' III fut·,· It. .''!STt,Þ..IT'I' '" "' 111-'11·"-11 '" "l"SI. II , , , ".",.. IILfI'flll:nllfn "If II. SI. 'I ... II!_. 1:1.1211I '" III II'~H'''' "' "11. I! I I , ,,''''WI ML.....Slm"l IN·f·11. CIIII"ST.I.,a.'1t1t .. H. IIHU...r.. 'H .('It. " I , , "'II1Y III'"LÞI IItIIfltl ""('11. ""I'b, Þ..'I'" H' ., ......HI·.. ". 'f·S1. " I I , "'my S~ '.In -.sl 'NTI1. "'ISb.".tI'lI ft, H' IIHIJ~·" III -rS1. I! I · , W/lTH S....'.IlI_, ,u·rlt. a.'u....Þ..'''. III IN WHU-es·,. HI (InJ". " I I , 15',m. IIIL" . _"LIT II 1111"""_. ""'. ". tI., '" III ............... , 'IISI". " · , , 8'1I1'U lit . .... .~In a".'ln. .. 'Db. a. Iftlf .. ., .....·.5.... ·1·". " I , JI'''IIV -....,. .·f·lt. -"1Iti, a. "11' .' '" -..... -(·S1, I! · · , tI·nu.. "".IlKIt .1I1þf .'rlt. .. 'n1.l., a."'" .. ., ........,.. "11. I! , I , .''''111 _t, acll&. "1M _.11. ..fIItt,CP....tll III '" .........,.. ·(·S1. " I I , JI'ltlftf .. . IlIAI -aa_. -. a. WU' m '" .......·.1.. '·SI. I! I r , .'1"'" ." , '-1( ... .'·It. -- tmA. CI. ItI1I m ,,, ....."..1.... -f·lt. " · , , .·"I'M _I-.sa... .·r81. __'.'..a...... m III ........... -... " , , .·/I'1ff ..-r '1IIIl " _"II. .... rm.. Ct. "'It '" In IIH'Hr.... ·('11. I! , , ,,'/1- _lILÞ'lfCII.ø u-rl1. .... '1111.. CI. "'II m tI. tI'-I""'I"" ""'u. " , , .'/1... IIlR I ..Ie" .... . ... U. "'flItt,..tI'l' III III """IfoIr.. "ll. I! , , .·n,.. it_ . GallI .., . _u. "".ra, Þ..tftll m m 1IH'''''-tI . "II. I! · , ,,'''PlN -'-""IW ...u. .... nn... Þ.. tit" m n, ....-... " ""'If. .. r , II'ltrM .m'I" "-11. .... 'nit, CI."'II '" In tIH,....,... " ""'L'. " · , IS'''''' -"_11 It _u. ","",a..II.1I m . .HIt·".... Nt '1'11. .. , , .."... _",III'li_1IftII ..-r 11. ""'au,.."'" . " ....nt·'I.. ., "·It. " 1 , .'/t. NI'_. MTIT. .. MI, Þ.. IT'I' tI II liS·",·,... IN Jln.... " , , 11'/11.. -_.araumr "Tit. .., 'U", Ct. tit. II . IIH.I........ Nt '°'1. " I , .'/1. .U1... ."'11. ..,Int........ . II ....8'...'.... III .....". " · , ..- .... _IS .1 III". ..-11£. .. fISk. 0.. "'" H " ""-11.. ." ·(·11. I! 1 , 11'/lUM ·.....111I' _. ., .. '·11. """"A. CI. ,,,.. " --. .-.---.. ...-......--.-- " SIll.( '.IIT ,"I.tal I1ltt ......11 . ..... ,d~f ~~ ~:-/ð //-/0 -.._--- ----_......__.~ - - Resolution No. 16846 Page 5 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 27th day of October, 1992, by the following vote: YES: Councilmembers: Horton, Malcolm, Moore NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Counci 1 members : Ri ndone, Nader ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None ,<(¡; CØt-L/ David L. Malcolm Mayor, Pro-Tempore ATTEST: '~'\ i ;: ( ~ . r, . " . )."" . . -- ·f I . 1..','.11. ' ) :(.({4.~,,:~ Beverly~. Authelet, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16846 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council held on the 27th day of October, 1992. Executed this 27th day of October, 1992. ~i! () ~{:rf. Beverly A.¡' Authelet, City Clerk J/~/I-- RESOLUTION NO. 16934 /-, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING COUNCIL POLICY NO. 585-1 BY EXPANDING THE USE OF UTILITY FUNDS TO REIMBURSE ALL PROPERTIES FOR THE COST OF UNDERGROUNDING OF PRIVATE SERVICE LATERALS WHEREAS, Council Policy No. 585-1, adopted by Resolution 11977 on April 2, 1985, addresses the use of util i ty all ocati on funds for the underground conversions of private service laterals; and, WHEREAS, the current Counci 1 Policy limits funding to single family residential properties; and, WHEREAS, in response to the complaints of condominium owners, the Council has directed staff to amend Council Policy 585-1, to examine the possibility of using utility funds to reimburse all properties for the underground conversion of private service laterals; and, WHEREAS, approval of the subject amendment to Council Policy No. 585-1 will a 11 ow the City to reimburse all properties for the cost of private undergrounding; and, WHEREAS, the Ci ty I S Underground Uti 1 i ty Advi sory Commi ttee (UUAC) has - ' reviewed the draft policy revision and recommends its approval by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend Council Policy No. 585-1 by expanding the use of utility funds to reimburse all properties for the cost of undergrounding of private service laterals as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. Presented by (' I I i I - , hn P. Lippitt rector of Public Works j/-/ __ ______~__..m_._..._._ Resolution No. 16934 Page 2 EXHIBIT . A· COUNaL POIJCY CTY OP 0iULA VISTA SUBJECT: USE OP UTIIJ1Y FUNDS POR POIJCY EFFECTIVE UNDERGROUND CONVERSION OP PRIVATE NUMBER DATE PAGE SERVICE LATERALS 585-01 12-15-92 lOP 2 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16934 T DA11ID: 12-15-92 BACKGROUND In 1982, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) by Decision 82-01-18 gave the authority to the local agencies to request electric utilities to expand allocation funds for the conversion of electric lateral services for each customer in utility allocation funded undergrounding districts. On October 18, 1983, Pacific Telephone (now Pacific Bell) filed a change in tariff with the CPUC so that communications utilities would also be in conformance with Decision 82-01-18. Cox Cable TV, is not governed by the CPUC, but chooses to cooperate with the program by providing conduit and service wires up to 100 feet in length at no cost to the single family residence. Decision 82-01-18 provides the ;mechanism to reduce the property owner's cost for the conversion from the distribution line to the residence. This cost depends on the distance from the property line to the point of connection with the customer's wiring and varies from customer to customer. . - The CPUC decision permits the use of utility funds to provide up to 100 feet of the property owner's service lateral (trenching and conduit). The net result is a reduction is cost that will benefit the individual property owner. Under the City Code it is the property owner's responsibility to provide and maintain the underground supporting stru=e needed on the property. PURPOSE To establish a policy for the use of utility funds for conversion of the customer's service laterals to encourage property owner acceptance for desirable conversion district projects. POIJCY The City Council establishes the following policy for the use of utility funds for underground conversion of private service laterals: 1. General Provisions A Punding shall be limited to facilities which customer traditionally supplies/installs - trenching and conduit from property line to point of connection. B. Funding shall not exceed the estimated cost of trenching and conduit installation for up to 100 feet of the private service lateral. //? //-4 -.--.........--..- Resolution No. 16934 Page 3 ~ COUNaL POUCY an OF OIDLA VISTA SUBJECT: USE OF UTIUIT FUNDS FOR POUCY EFFECllVE UNDERGROUND CONVERSION OF PRIVATE NUMBER DATE PAGE SERVICE LATERALS 585-01 12-15-92 2 OF 2 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16934 I DATED: 12-15-92 2. ImDlementation Procedures a. The use of utility funds to convert private service laterals shall be recommended by the City's Utility Undergrounding Advisory Committee (UUAC). b. UUAC members shall determine the length of lateral (trenching and conduit) that is (1) eligible for utility funding for each property within the conversion district and (2) the length of conduit and wire that the appropriate cable company will provide free of charge to each residential property. c. UUAC members shall agree on a 'reasonable' cost per linear foot of lateral conversion. d. UUAC utility member representatives shall agree on the proportional split each utility is to bear for conversion of the service laterals. , I e. All owners within the conversion district shall be informed of the utility fund amount proposed to be reimbursed prior to the public hearing on the conversion district formation. f. Council shall set the limit for each amount of reimbursement to be applied to each service lateral by resolution. The amounts shall be those recommended by the UUAC or as amended by Council pursuant to public hearing deliberations. g. Utility companies shall pay City the total proportional shares specified in 'E' above when: (1) all the customers have satisfactorily completed their service lateral conversion, and (2) the electric metering equipment has passed a City inspection certifying it ready to receive underground service. h. The City shall then pay the amount of reimbursement due each owner after receipt of funds from the utiliry companies. NOTES: (1) The service lateral shall be defined as: trench, backfùl, and any necessary conduit from the customer's property line to the underground sweep at the base of the customer's termination facility. In those cases where the service conduit enters the customer's building, the service lateral will terminate at the point where the conduit enters the building. (2) For the purpose of this policy utility is defmed as any company providing electric, telephone communications, cable television and data transmission services. ¡ //-/1/ Resolution No. 16934 Page 4 --', PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 15th day of December, 1992, by the following vote: YES: Counei 1 members: Fox, Horton, Moore NOES: Counei 1 members: None ABSENT: Council members: None ABSTAIN: Counci lmembers: Rindone, Nader LÚ 1¡;- 1~¿1¡!¡.{? ,{'0 Shitey Horton Mayor / Pro-Tempore ATTEST: <,",:--, Beverly A. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16934 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council held on the 15th day of December, 1992. Executed this 15th day of December, 1992. J/---If .'-_............ --_._-,----_.-.,.~_. ----------- RESOLUTION NO. J 79Ctì RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING DATES FOR PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE READY TO RECEIVE UNDERGROUND SERVICE AND THE REMOVAL OF POLES AND OVERHEAD FACILITIES WITHIN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 123 PHASE 1, ALONG E STREET FROM BROADWAY TO FOURTH AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore by Resolution No. 16846 established Underground utility District No. 123 along E Street, from Broadway to Toyon Lane; and WHEREAS, this resolution covers the first phase of the district which starts at Broadway and ends at Fourth Avenue; and WHEREAS, in accordance with section 15.32.150 of the Chula vista Municipal Code, it is now desired, pursuant to said resolution, to fix the date on which affected property owners must be ready to receive underground service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula vista that the following dates are hereby established ordering the property owners to prepare properties for receipt of underground utilities: l. The property owners within Underground utility District No. 123, Phase 1 shall be ready to receive underground service from San Diego Gas and Electric Company on March 16, 1998. 2. Poles, overhead wires and associated overhead structures shall be removed from parcels within Underground utility District No. 123, Phase 1 by July 15, 1998. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the city of Chula vista be, and she is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to all affected utility companies and property owners. Presented by Approved as to form by s::lc' ~ /~:;::J7 ì John P. Lippitt, Director of ~n M. Kaheny, ~ Public Works ttorney C:\rs\UUD ))/l -/ - _._~-_. "-'"""-- ,-- -...--.-..---- -----..---..---- RESOLUTION NO. / 'if 9 ú / RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF UTILITY ALLOCATION FUNDS TO SUBSIDIZE PRIVATE SERVICE LATERAL CONVERSIONS SERVING NON-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITHIN THE E STREET UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 123 BETWEEN BROADWAY AND TOYON LANE WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution 16934 amending City Council Policy #585-01 by expanding the use of SDG&E utility funds to reimburse all properties for the cost of undergrounding of private service laterals; and WHEREAS, prior to the amendment, the policy allowed reimbursement to single family residential properties only; and WHEREAS, said resolution indicated that the Policy amendment is applicable to all future districts and to all the utility undergrounding districts that were formed in calendar year 1992; and WHEREAS, each property owner required to dig a trench for lateral connection will be reimbursed at a rate of $30 per foot of trenching (up to 100') and the City will reimburse each property owner, after receipt of said funds from SDG&E and completion of the building permit process; and WHEREAS, the subsidy to 20 single family dwellings is estimated to be $21,600 and the estimated subsidy to 12 non-single family dwellings is estimated to be $12,300. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby authorize the expenditure of $33,900 of utility allocation funds to subsidize private service lateral conversions serving non-single family residential properties within the E Street Underground Utility District No. 123 between Broadway and Toyon Lane as set forth in Exhibit B. Presented by Approved as to form by Þt.~ John P. Lippitt, Director of M. Kaheny, Public Works torney C:\r8\Utility.811 ))[J--j . --. ._._---,-,----~--_.__._.._.__. Exhibit "B" , r ,) ? - i: ;-;:' ¡. m íj" '. '''' - 'I;:: - .-f. (L I, , ¡ '0""'..- ,J;I :.:: ._¡:- ~ I ;, J -. 0__ ~ ... ~ ! ;JI :f~ C .¡ i 1. r:;T-~ :¡¡ '¡ ¡ ~~ r T .. Q) ¡-". -.. .. . ,~ .. ;. - t . E "--, 'I ' tJ¡ r J ¡. -r: r"""\ ';h J;_ ; 1-L. ... : o -r-' Q) . > - Q) f . ._, _ o / c\~. I .. \ . ro ..... \ \ --\ : :.........1 \, ". ~. \ \,V :.:.....1 C "":'j' \ Q)':.', ..1 rrç p>.. \.J' .;c.S.·.]. . >''':1': . ."" . f:JL})?;~" . L ~-~f?~~iJ þ r .~\~~, · ...... ./. I ... ¡ . \.. /" . \!1 . '- J . \....,. .: ~ 'v Y'::~:'? \.\¡ '. .. ....~....: "-......... · r-..··..·, . \/~y:: !1!'='..1 F~:::.\ /':E? ) ~ .;. -. ~ .- ~ 0 i,' .' -·;.;;.~~::i·.l u ä ~ ; . .! .';" .! ··1 ··..·.........'....c _ .~ '..-.~.~...:.:.; ..; "!'>::Y?\\ ¿: '~!.... "" '. !~ +- :i:.>:.-:.:: ~ ~ it " ... - - . . ...... . _ - - - , . . ,- -_.._~ ..., :: - . : ]j , ."':1 ......... ~:::¡ - . . ... "... .... ..... - ... .. ,..........-.-. -~ I· ... .. ..." " """""1 · .......'..... a ;< 6. !. ';; .: ".1 -.": :::' ,', :::::\::.:: ~ '-'- - '''':'1 - , ¡ ; i ;·~:i~·;) 2 < , ,- -.,.. ,\ ~ . , ,. \.......~ 0- ~ ! = : : :- - ! ":'~':""':- . .." ,.. .., ". .:".' '> '" 0, ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡; ~ ~ ~ ¡ .,.:_: J -;:, kg· ; ;; .. '.]. < , ~ _ z;;¡ :: : gr:;. "' .. ð ";: .....;o:;r:; c" :0",",,,,,,, ~; , , U- I j ; ~ t :: ~. . : - . I , " :. ,I '. ~ ',I ~ !. 1! ¡. ; i ! á u ;i' ~ ~; . t: . i f ì ! ¡, 1 ~ á~:a.. II:=! :I,)...c....! tI ~ ¡----> m 1 ' , . f; ~.. :: r: .-:=. 1- :! I...,! ,:..::-"·1: ..!a ~ ::..) !·t·I~IU~-¡.·:·ì.,·'~::~ ; ~ - I . . I ! I; 2 ~I r - .. ~'".:2 .: -- < 41/ II n I:.AIIIUIL ~ --. '_", --- :'~ r - ~ : ~ ~ :~~ . ~ ~ O ~ 7:, ; l)~: ;: :: = ~ f:;. - t:.~;, E --.,¡ L:¡ I --r- -"" 't" .. 'F ~ ~ l0 i 'f r ! - N H:;: l ' < --- ;~ -- ¿ ~ - ~ , CD ~ f ~ ro I ~ 1 ." .. J. . . - - . . . i --- . j., - ,.r- '0< .J. i .. - ..' -~- ! ¡ ::- : ,: .. , ! . .,.... .- '. .j <:>-f." ... : . - -:/ ... ~/ -; L:: ~ / '7 - . /:'';:. "'-'. · S : .......,,'e:. .,'.' C- ·L', ., . : -)4..._ i: ;, ~J/.: /~':" \.¡, ¿......"..... . ·.;-_·...::::-1 1:1 .... - i ~ '. ..\(:- .\~; ~ "i~ ¡~, '.' ~~?~;i1?JJ ":\';'. -!- ,::.' \ J\~';¡-J'._-", ____ ,.... ,\ ci~ ':~<__':'_.>~::;.?::'i. I, t "'~-" .' . -s;:-ž·:~~· ~¡ \ - - . '. . - !-ao;..OO.IID-O...... .....rl0l: - ......_.. u::...--O.........ció..:..;.....· .""\ .. V' ! '" <. - -~_.. _..~:;;\. " ~~ r. .::" , .} . -.l ;; ~ ...... ....-; ... ~ õ.., - (...j :s; -:: ë i i" :¡ i" ¡¡ ¡; ; . 'Ir: d-- 11 ""r !: ~~~~~=~;l ~ /' I Z ~ o Z i~~:-~~~D: ::::::::::::Z;. 0 -. í! - . ".~ _ ~ .. :. .. .. _ î I "'!........,. ;. _ ;.¡",, =......!!.Ò& :O_I:LI:LI:LI:I.<>....{ '" Q l>5E~if~.QJ! g.......fÐlIO"'lOló,) ~- ""- - ",Q'tgäiiiJoÞ í¡¡¡¡¡¡¡A: - . ~:s ... U 0 ~ 0 U ~ ~ U ~ 8 6555 g g i \ ..., ~ ~ -G1~--§~ ~~ I i I:;¡ II _ - <..J ... ":" _ 7:-:I~ I"':" 1"7 '"':" I~ "':" ":> , ' ~t, . w, - fi £î tJ 6 eJ~P It ~~S~~@@~@@~;\ ' .::., ~ 8 e Þ : Q~ ~~ \ -- . ~ '" ,\ ' 'n~'/~ . ,$ ¡;" ,. , ~ - "2 ~;··"·.'·'.·<-8".- i - /'Or¡! d ..:¡... ... '" ... ... .. on _ ::,¡ - . .. - ~ t -'. . / - c.J \. _..s --" :\' / >. !;I'i ,.-........."...0....,..,...... . ~~ .;:.-.."'.............."'........ "':::: \ /..- _0 - - /:: , ;< ! U= · ~ ., .. .. . .. .. .. ... t - ....... .....,., .. .. .. ... , 'l5 ... .. - - .. ... - ...... = ~ '.11111, U r ~ ~ ;¡! S! . 1 .... · j J . ~ s,,¡¡!.....& i .' i3 -,!.!.!ti=~.!~.!':.'"'''''' 0,;::;;- <;:;.:I.>,,~~~.,2i~=s:¡!!ff - - _.' 'o~...., ~ -:¡ I:> .. CI = II:> ,. ,. CI ,. ,. :;I ,. ::. ,;, i. ~ i ):;2 < ~~!~" A" ~~.~~. ~" ~~" ~. ~!~;:'I~' ~' .:;, '. _.- . ø~' '":' ":' ·':";:...·:..1,.. ,...... .. ~ :.!i;~li.. I:: III L!_ .. ~~iL~ i':~:"il" ¡" ¡"I" "¡'P'¡"II¡!¡ i¡li¡ ¡ . Exhibit "D" CHAPTER IX-B: COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICTS IX-B.O Purpose In addition to the objectives outlines in Chapter VII, the Commercial Di s t ri ct¡;¡¡¡ìff,%~ 4s- included to provide for a quality environment and to achieve a harmonious mixture of retail and service commercial uses. Specifically, the Commercial District is intended to meet the following objectives: - - To reserve appropriately located areas for retail stores, service establishments and offices, offering commodities and services required by residents of the city and its surrounding market area; -- To provide an opportunity and appropriate development stan- dards for larger warehouse/discount retail commercial and support facilities; -- To encourage retail and service commercial uses, and related support uses, to concentrate for the convenience of the public and for a more mutually beneficial relationship to each other; -- To provide adequate space to meet the needs of modern commer- cial development, including off-street parking and loading areas; - - To minimize traffic congestion and avoid overloading utilities by restricting construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the amount of land around them; and, -- To promote high standards of site planning, architecture and landscape design for commercial developments within the City of Chula Vista. A. Commercial District (C-l.) This district is intended as an area for large scale retail commercial facilities, along with complementary support, recre- ation, and entertainment commercial uses, which can meet the high XL 6'2 9, : :',·¡¡t":.7 ...........-.-.-...-........-.-........ IX-B -1 13 performance and development standards of the Rancho del Rey Planned Community. 'I}; Cbil:iliïerciia); '.'Dis.tt:i¢tE{Gf2).. ................ .-...-.-....,............ ..........-...-....................,.......... .;.;.:.;~.;.;.:.:.;.:.........- .-.-.-.-..................;.;.;.,;.;-:.;.;...; .....................-..........;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.:.:.;....:........... 1ftðÆg¡;~±~!tt.mg!t¡ffiB¡±ft!t~n2i~~;;ft~5t1iBð~g;.¡ftgB¡;.~.mgfj.¿Æ¡~gBW¡~tl;Jtgn1š~~.æ~tliË~ f.aC&lditilieïiW.;$Ií'.;tmäJtiilYIfiÖ'seidtetneWiiii:üï\ei;l±ate1œödaIri1íéighbö:thööds . :::::;;:::;;::~:;;:::;:::;:;:~::~::;:;:~:::;;;:;:;:::;;;:::;;::;:::;::/¡::::::::.....;:;:::;:;:::::~:;:::;:::':;::::::::::;:::::::::::::;:::;..,~::::;;::;;:;;:::;::;;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:::;:;:;:;:::;:::;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;;;:;::;;:;:~;:;:;:::~~;:;:::::::::~~:::::;::;:;:,;;:::;;;:;;;:;:;:;:;:;;:~:;'~::::;';;:::::~;:::::;::::;:::::;:::::::::::::::::~::;:::::;:;:~~::::;:{0::::~:':';';'::::::;:::::::~;:~;::::;;::;;:;'::;;:::;;:;;:;::::::;;:;:::;:;;:::; IX-B.l PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES The following uses shall be permitted uses where the symbol lip" appears and shall be permitted uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit where the symbol "C" appears. !tgtli,\lffi'&riig~,~miH,~~g¡[ffitli¡¡It1f¡;¡g¡¡;æ ii=illlii¡(iC¡112~!!!:~!~~tIi!!!1ff!!'~i~!'~!!!~~~!û!~~ï~;Ñ!~ appears. LAND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ Çi42 .:.>;.:.;.:.......... A. Service and Commercial 1. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic and/or office C ª 2$ Automa1ttiittteIæèJct:tiïíachiiné E p :';:;:;;~~:';: ~:;~;::: :;:::::::;:::,:::,:;:::::&:::::::::~;:::~::~,;,;:::;,:;;;:~ ::;;::::::::::::::;:::::::::::;:;:~;:::,:;: :::::;,::': ;;:::::;:::::;:;:::k:;:;:;:~;: ;,:::::; 3. Automobile and/or truck services C N 4. Bakery, retail P p; 5. Barber or beauty shop P P 6. Blueprinting and photocopying P 9 7. Car washing establishment subject to provisions of Section 19.58.060 CVMC C 1.'1:. 8. Clothes cleaning pick-up agencies with incidental pressing P p 9. Clothing sales P N §l~XJ!iïiI! IX-B -2 I{ . -"-_.._-~---,._---_.._-- LA1ID USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ C;;2 10. Day care, nursery school C g II. Drug store, pharmacy p N 12. Eating and drinking establishments: a. Restaurant, restaurant with cocktail lounge, coffee shop, and full delicatessen (may serve alcoholic beverages) p N b. Refreshment stands & snack bars within a building as accessory to permitted use p p c. Fast food restaurants with drive-in or drive-through P N dM §~~fíi9fi¡gi!;;s,!%tî!tài,m;lt¡¡~~i$~±1BªË;~ :":::::::::~: ;ì;p¡¡¡M,~~I9ËIæ¡¡B±,¥ìSß±$M¡;gn±~ :~:, N ".w: 13. Gasoline dispensing and/or automobile service station C N i4. Grocery, B81t7%f:':n~~1t¡;¡¡¡¡Ffruit or vegetable store p N 15. Health or athletic club C C 16. Hotel, motel; subject to provisions of Section 19.58.210 CVMC C N 17 . Liquor store (package, off-site only) C N ªtg\!;z~? IX-B -3 - I'] OM' "" ...__.... LÞ-~ USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ C"'2 18. Medical and dental offices, and clinics, medical, optical and dental laboratories, not including the man- ufacture of pharmaceutical or other products for general sale or distri- bution C C 19. Movie theater, multi-plex P N 20. Offices: administrative and execu- tive offices; professional offices for lawyers, engineers, architects; financial offices including banks, real estate and other general busi- ness offices P P 21, Plant nurseries and similar outdoor sales C ç >:.:.;. 22. Recreation, commercial including bowling alley, billiard parlor, skating rink, and miniature golf course subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.040 CVMC C ~ 23. The retail of such bulky items as furni ture, carpets and other similar items P N. 24. Retail distribution centers and manufacturer's outlets which require extensive floor areas for the stor- age and display of merchandise, and the high volume, warehouse-type sale of goods and uses which are related to and supportive of existing on-site retail distribution centers of manu- facturer's outlets. P N ¡¡i{~@ïì¥t IX-B -4 lýY LFJID USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT r:.::.J.. CA2 25; g~~8¡¡:%8B¥1;~Þ;8g~¡;Æ!t˱1%~&B:g...Þ;fffi~Æ;SftBtB? Ê!tí±:%2t*f!Þ;8g~; J? ç 2S1 f1ÍMtì'i8BfflfI.9f1i!irfuæ8ffIIffiR'gæ#~E槧8 fa ç gy@ MM€;j;g¡n5ffi'~10Æ~§8;!S~8B#*t p ç .;!4 . Any other retail business or service 28W establishment supplying commodities :.;.,.~;.;.;.:...'." or performing services which is deter- mined by the Planning Commission to be of the same general character as the above mentioned retail business or service uses and open during normal business hours of the above uses P J? ~. Stores, shops and offices supplying 29",<' commodities or performing services for the residents of the city as a whole or the surrounding community such as department stores, specialty shops, banks, business offices, and other financial institutions and personal service enterprises P ~ B. Public and Semi-Public Uses l. Day nurseries, day care schools and nursery schools C P 2. Educational institutions, public or private including vocational schools C J? 3. Post offices and post office terminals!F!!!9\ii¡J¡·ÞP¥!$g;¡¡g¡j;qg$ C C 4. Recreation, private, semi-private, or commercial C ç ~i~WZ~.1 IX-B -5 17 Lh~'D USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ C"4 5. Public and quasi-public uses appro- priate to the district, such as professional, business and technical schools of a public service type, but not including corporation yards, storage or repair yards, and warehouses C !?:. 6. School and studio for arts and crafts; photography, music, dance and art galleries, in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.58.220 CVMC C P gUt f!ffii!i$~ê.ig%j¥1W¡':Þ~I¡i;1i1 C E :::::::;::~:::::;:;.:: .... '8"'" !ê!±gr¡ÆI#}ft!Rwægæ8nIf!5gÊ!tEfH~Effiñ~ c W ::.:.:.;:;~::; .~{!{ §gítæBèIêIf!~Æ1}ìm~B!R#Ê"Mít!RII~Ê$ffijl¡fu˱i~I¡ ~ïig~IB~i:¡n§8~¡I5I¡~E$¡¡2$8;9;!ie¡¡¡i!ia!$IJ!I€ii c )? ;¡;gg RgEMB±1I2{l8IOOfti?i!i~~f!~Ig5~i!iaffi,~;B!tffigtt!f c c "f. Any other public or semi-public use 1L1iW which is determined by the Planning .;.:.:.:-:.",.:-:.:-;. Commission to be of the same general character as the above permitted uses C ¡¡>,. C. Accessory Uses 1. Accessory structures and uses located on the same lot as permitted or conditional use P g 2. Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage facilities P P ªZ¡¡;XZ;¡æ IX-B -6 (t LAND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT .c..::..l 0"'2 3 . Incidental services for employees on a site occupied by a permitted or conditional use, including day care, recreational facilities, showers and locker rooms P p 4. Roof mounted satellite dishes subject to the following standards or conditions: P E a. The dish shall be screened using appropriate matching architectural materials or parapet walls; b. Dishes shall be of a neutral color, match the building, or as otherwise approved by the City; c. A building permit shall be required; and, d. No advertising material shall be allowed on the satellite dish antenna. Satellite dish antennae containing advertising material shall be considered signs. D. Temporary Uses 1. Temporary uses as prescribed in Chapter XI p P IX-B.2 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following property development standards apply to all land and buildings other than accessory buildings authorized in the Commercial District. Any legal lot may be used as a building site, except no building permit shall be issued for any lot having a lot size less than 10,000 square feet. ~lg¡¡;%íì!jj .,--.---.------------ IX-B -7 /1 - ~._.,....- - ---~---,,_...__._--- --~._. A. General Requirements The following requirements are minimums unless otherwise stated: Dev"'loDment Standard I. Lot area, net sq. ft. (000' s) 1 10 2. Lot width (feet) 100 3. Lot depth (feet) 100 4. Front yard setback (feet) 25" 5. Side yard setback, each (feet) 102 6. Public street ROW setback (feet) 20 7. East IIHII St. ROW setback (feet) 607 8. Rear yard setback (feet) 102 9. Rice Canyon top of slope setback 50 Bldg/20 Parking (feet) 10. Building height, maximum',s 35 feet or 2 stories, whichever is less 1I. Maximum lot coverage (percent of net lot) 4 40 12. Parcels 1, 3 and 4 should have a minimum of 100,00 sq. ft. single tenant building. :w.__.»»>: = co::::: . : = ·X{0»:· 1 Map for conàominium development does not need to meet lot area requirement. Minimum lot area may be reduced to 10,000 sq. ft. for master planned building complexes with Precise Plan approval. Such Precise Plans shall be for a total area of no less than 60,000 sq. ft. 2 May be reduced to zero ( 0) with Site Plan approval. 3 Heights which vary from these standards may be approved via a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approval. 4 Open space lots or other special setbacks along East nH" Street shall be included in the adjacent building lot area for purposes of the lot coverage calculation. S Architectural feature, entry identification, or roof-top screening allowed to 50 ft. in height 6 Refer also to Design Guidelines for individual parcel criteria. 7 Existing lots 4,7 & B of Final Map # 12267 (T.T. Map 88-2) shall have a minimum of 40 foot East "H" St. ROW setback for building less than 100,000 square feet. The East "H" St. building setback for all lots shall be used as a landscape buffer area. Any encroachment into this area for parking, driveways, or hardscape shall be subject to the approval of the Design Review Committee. i1K~¢t¡¡Z IX-B -8 20 ---....-.....--.- B. Special Requirements l. Along all street frontages situated across from any residen- tially zoned property, the use of berms, fences, and landscap- ing shall be used consistent with the Business Center Design Guidelines. 2. Streetscapes shall be enhanced to provide an easy transition from the street to the building. Patios, circulation and parking spaces can be included in setback areas to help buffer adjoining parcels from one another. 3. For Lots 1 and 3 of Subdivision 93-01 and Lot 1 of Subdivision 92-05 the minimum building size shall be 100,000 square feet and shall be occupied by a single user. IX-B.3 GENERAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The following performance standards are general guidelines intended to describe the overall minimum design standards for the Commercial Center. The design guidelines which occur in Chapter VI of the SPA Plan and the separate Employment Park/Commercial Center Design Guidelines text provide specific recommendations. A. Landscaping In the Commercial District the required front and exterior side (street !Side) yard setbacks shall be landscaped. Parking, driveways, and other decorative hardscape areas will be permitted within the required rear yard, interior side yard, East "H" Street, and Rice Canyon top-of-slope setbacks. (Refer also to Business Center Design Guidelines for areas abutting Rice Canyon), Landscap- ing shall consist predominantly of plant materials and shall be irrigated by automatic sprinklers. All planting and irrigation shall be in accordance with the City's Landscape Manual and the Business Center Design Guidelines. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained in a clean, healthy and thriving condition, free of weeds, trash and debris. ~12}¡tê7 IX-B -9 '2f -"--.---...-..- B. Equipment All ground mounted mechanical equipment, including heating and air conditioning units and trash receptacle areas, shall be completely screened from view of surrounding properties. (See also Business Center Design Guidelines) C. Utili ties All utility connections shall be designed to coordinate with the architectural elements of the site so as not to be exposed except where required by utility provider. (See also Business Center Design Guidelines) D. Electrical Disturbance, Heat and Cold, Glare No use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which creates changes in temperature or direct glare, detectable by the human senses without the aid of instruments, beyûnd the boundaries of the site. No use shall be permitted which creates electrical disturbances that affect the operation of any equipment beyond the boundaries of the lot. E. Fire and Explosive Hazard All storage of and activities involving inflammable and explosive materials shall be provided with adequate safety and fire fighting devices to the specifications of the Uniform Fire Code. All incineration is prohibited. Adequate smoke detectors shall be installed in all new construction. F. Noise l. General The acceptable outdoor noise exposure levels, measured at the property line, for the Employment Park Districts are given in the table below. (See Chapter 19.66 CVMC for definitions and additional details.) Exterior Noise Limits· Receiving Land Use District 8 am - 10 pm 10 pm - 8 am 'Iii $g¡Pê7 IX-B -10 22- _______uu__. -- - - - -_._-".._----_.__..-~~---- -....- C-1/Qi2 65 dbA 60 dbA *Environmental Noise - Leg in any hour *Nuisance Noise - not exceeded at any time Noise generated by activities within the Commercial District shall not exceed the noise standard for a residential district measured at the boundary of the receiving residential dis- trict. Refer also to Title 19 of the Chu1a Vista Municipal Code for more specific noise attenuation requirements. All truck loading and unloading shall be conducted indoors or, if outdoors, in a manner or in a location which meets the noise performance standard for the C-1 District. Noise attenuation measures ( sound wall, enclosures, operation restrictions, etc. ) shall be provided to acoustically screen or otherwise prevent unacceptable noise impacts to residential development. In order to assure that the proposed attenuation measures are adequate, a Noise Study shall be submitted for the proposed project with the Design Review submittal or delivery operations shall be prohibited from 10 pm to 7 am weekdays or 8 am on weekends. 2. Paging/PA Systems Outdoor sound systems for music and/or paging shall be . prohibited. G. Odor No use shall be permitted which created odor in such quantities as to be readily detectable beyond the boundaries of the site. H. Radioactivity In the Commercial District, the use of radioactive materials shall be limited to measuring, gauging and calibration devices, and medical X-ray diagnostic equipment. I. Vibration No use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which generates inherent and recurrent ground vibration percepti- ~ïg~l{ì7 IX-B -11 :?-~ - _.._,-- ble, without instruments, at the boundary of the lot on which the use is located. J. Condominium Conversion In the Commercial District, the conversion of a project to condominium ownership shall meet all the requirements of the zone to the maximum extent possible. Specific City Council waiver shall be required where the zone requirements cannot be met. K. Air Pollution There shall be no emission on any site, for more than one minute in any hour, of air contaminants which, at the emission point or within a reasonable distance of the emission point, is as dark or darker in shade as that designated as No. 1 on the Ringelman Chart as published in the United States Bureau of Mines Information Circular 7718. L. Outdoor Storage and Sales OUtdoor storage areas shall be entirely enclosed by visual barriers to adequately screen views from the external boundaries of the property. Permanent outdoor sales areas shall be screened to improve site aesthetics when viewed from a distance, but the screening materials are not required to be solid or opaque, and may allow filtered close-range views of the materials for sale. Screening design and materials shall be consistent with the architecture/materials of the adjacent building (Refer also to Business Center Design Guidelines) . M. Energy Conservation Buildings shall be located on the site to provide adjacent buildings adequate sunlight for solar access when practical. Buildings should be designed to minimize energy consumption. N. Toxic Materials No land or building shall be used or occupied in any manner which creates an unhealthful, dangerous, noxious or otherwise objection- able condition due to the use, storage or proximity to toxic materials. ~tgî7?1 IX-B -12 2.1 ---_._.~--~._._- --"..-------- O. Liquid or Solid Waste The discharge or deposit of liquid or solid wastes shall be subject to the provisions of Section 19.66.150 CVMC. P. Aesthetic Standards 1. All uses at the perimeter of the Commercial District shall be landscaped to provide a buffered transition to adjacent uses. 2. Visual appearance shall be a principal consideration in the approval of Conditional Use Permits, especially any uses involving outdoor storage or activity. Consideration should be given to all prospective vantage points, including residen- tial areas which may be at a higher elevation. 2" !~,~¡¡ttj¡ìfti@:¡~~íitt~gi¡~~lil~~ ,;;':" tigii¡ttlt3%~~33®~ii¡Ettî5¡5žæ¡itrl!i$!tè;%9tfl1Ôtt~ffi.ffi®tt~¡¡j¡ì~¡¡~§i,~~¡i1fu~~¡itt~œ5¡g# ~ffi~g~1'f¡¡~iïi!fi¡¡i~!t¡~i!f;ît~J~HJ¡!g@ii¡~1.I~!15i¡1~~g~ijl~!tê1!iW~î¡g~~èf?ì1~~i¡!f~i®þ¡tt~ ftgtt~i1Í'¡¡~mælfffiªgè~ÊgªHIE¡î¡iW]®¡ðî5~~5m¡i1'i§1t1¡iii1fu1t~~Er:gfiti1a~¡i¡~ft~~tt~~ ~kt~~1fffig~i¡¡æt§E¡ii[!f~H¡~~~¡®g~n¡~!nê1ggffiffiggÊ*g~¡¡iæ~$Iill$~!t¡i1flnmff~EHtt\f¡¡¡g ìI%ê&~¡¡&ffi~~i1Í'¡0Æ!f~ft#E\!1ií~Ê[¡ IX-B.4 COMMERCIAL CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS In addition to the standards promulgated herein, Design Guidelines for the Rancho del Rey Business Center shall be adopted by the City of Chula Vista to further refine and implement these zoning regulations. Þ~l development within the Commercial District shall be subject to Design Review as provided in Section 19.14.582 CVMC. The following are primary design standards which are further refined and implemented through the Design Guidelines. A. Fencing Where a fence or wall is required adjacent to Rice Canyon for noise attenuation, screening or other purposes, it shall be a decorative masonry or concrete wall which is consistent with the community wall design standards found in the Design Guidelines. At interior site locations, fencing design and materials shall be consistent with the requirements of the Design Guidelines. ªï~4l}1'1 IX-B -13 2S- __..~____.._______,_____m_""___·__ __ _...'_"_'_____ __ _ __'____... ..."- ,---" -.----.----"~.-- B. Parking All parking areas delineated on the approved Site Plan shall be maintained for parking purposes, unless a modified site plan is approved. Temporary uses, for which a temporary use permit has been secured, may utilize parking areas as allowed by the temporary use permit. c. Site Lighting All light sources shall be shielded in such a manner that the light is directed away from streets and adjoining properties. Illumina- tors shall be integrated within the architecture of the building. Lighting plans shall be submitted and approved as a part of the Design Review process. Such plans shall be evaluated utilizing the criteria set forth in the Design Guidelines. E. Architectural Standards An architectural theme has been established for the Rancho del Rey Community. A complementary theme has been established for the Commercial Center (C-l District) . This theme is described and standards/guidelines for various building and site design elements are set forth in the Business Center Design Guidelines. The intent of these standards is to induce the repetitive use of common designs and building elements to create a unified aesthetic, both for this district and the community as a whole. The proposed architectural design for each project shall be evaluated for consistency with the adopted Business Center Design Guidelines through the Design Review process. . IX-B.5 SIGNS No sign or outdoor advertising structure shall be permitted in the Commercial District except as provided in Chapter XII or herein. Additional standards and regulations for signs are provided in the Business Center Design Guidelines. All permitted or approved signs within this district shall be consistent with the Commercial Center provisions of the Business Center Design Guidelines. 71····· :!ì!?ð?fì! IX-B -14 2~ ___ ...__. .. ~ ..____.______.__.._~'",·U"__·____~ Exhibit "E" w _ ....... ,0 J' - ~ ~.i 0- g; o ,~~ rr ø p~ ~ 81 I .t. Œ:: "0 J~ § I t !Ie -.J / ~~ C I ~ \. : I . . I p ~J 1 r I r . ( = ~ \ '" \ ~ \, \ /~.... \ì- _ / I / . ../ . \1 ( . D / It 0 . / \\ \ ./ '. I . -. '../ . "- ',~ ~~ & ........... ......... It o .' ~ ~ # 1-;:: \ ~ ü 1- ,¡ . b ~ f U 0 0 1:: . ~ )-- ~ . t- I >. · <J1 . -,-c:'" : - I ~ o F> ( r.......8 f ~ I>i I 1 ~ 0' 2 \ Q ¡;¡ þo ~ ~ ~ '!: I ~ u c::: oct _.... ~ :0; 0 '" :'.' I & CI) Ëõitffi~~ I: \ ~ 'wo~~ ~ ~ '\.... O~ to) i Vol.... z.J ~.. ..:... .... _ ~ ~ ~ë'ø~..c c~~~ ~ \j .s ~ ~ eÉ~...J~ ~;;;;;; f \ o ð <:"C:.tt: ;:)ððS .>. w u ~f;;¡;," coo, II I"" ~ ~.c:::~a:'t:~å*~ I: ,g C ... w;:;_w -'cc<C. g Ò ~ ~ ~..".i: w ~ ~ ~ i < 0 z..~:::E", ( )Z~~ -' :: W:~O,.:'i ~r' -' It °c-,o,-, Eli 188m I illill0§ i~ 0 27 fl" THIS PAGE BLANK L~ ------- ._.__~_.."__._.__.~.~~__.~""..M.._._'__....___ '....n...__m__." _~___~______._ /!r7ACHM£iJT Z, ADDENDUM TO EIR-87-01 (EL R-\NCHO DEL REY SPECIFIC PLA.'\ A.l\1.ENDME!\T) RDR SPA 1 Information Center PROJECT NAME: SPA I Amendment & GP A for the RDR Information Center PROJECT LOCATION: Lot, along the south side of the intersection ofRJmcho Del Rey Parkway and Paseo RJmchero, RJmcho Del Rey DeveJopment, ChuJa Vista, CA. PROJECT APPLICANT: Rancho Del Rey Investors, L.P. (McMillin - RDR, inc.) PROJECT AGENT Gary Cinti CASE NO.: IS-98-10 DATE: November 25, 1997 I. ThT'fRODUCTION The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERe) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report (EIR) if one of the following conditions is present: 1. The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion of the Final EIR (EIR-87-01) have not created any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR. 2. Additional or refined information available since completion of the Final EIR regarding the potential environmental impact of the proj ect, or regarding the measures or alternatives avaiJabJe to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show that the project will have one or more significant impacts which were not previousJy addressed in the Final EIR. This addendum has been prepared in order to provide additional information and analysis concerning service impacts as a result of the proposed land use. FEIR 87-01 analyzed the impact of the development of the property as an information center introducing potential home buyers to the neighborhoods ofRJmcho del Rey. The property is now proposed to be developed as a co=ercial site. As a result of tlùs analysis, the basic conclusions of the Final EIR have not changed. Traffic and public service impacts are found to be less than significant for the proposed project. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared the following addendum to EIR-87-01. n. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project proposes a change of land use for a 1.6 acre site located in the Rancho del Rey Community from a present information center use (new homes sales office) to a neighborhood :¿c¡ _.----------~-_._.- .... ... ..._.__..~---- commerciaJ-retai] use. The C-2 district is intended to provide for sma]] scale facilities. primarily to serve the irru-nediate 10ca] neighborhood. In order to accornp1ísh the proposed change in land use, amendments to a number ofpJans/exhibits wiJ] be required as fo]lows: a.) GeneraJ Plan/Specific Plan: Amend the designation on the Land Use EJement diagram for this site to Commercial - Retail. b.) Rancho deJ Rey SPA I: Amend the Site Utilization PJan from Community Facility to Commercial. c.) PC District Regulations: Amend the designation from OS-3 to C-2, and provide the list of uses p=itted, conditionally permitted, and those not permitted. III. PROJECT SETTING The 1.6 acre project site is Jocated one block north of East 'H' Street on the south west portion where Paseo Ranchero forms a 'T' - intersection with Rancho del Rey Parkway. The project site is located at a very prominent visual portal to the Rancho del Rey development. The project site is fully developed. There is presentJy a 2,380 sq. ft. building on this site. There is also a paved and Iandscaped parking lot containing 34 parking spaces. The area surrounding the existing building is also Iandscaped. The average slope of the site is about 2%. The south easterly portion of the site (36,375 sq. ft.) is traversed by a 250 ft. wide San Diego Gas & Electric Easement. The easement covers about half of the project site and precludes the buiJding of any structures within its boundaries. Major SDG&E power lines are Iocated on this easement. There is also an area (17,570 sq. ft.) within the project site that has been cleared and graded but remains unpaved and contains a trailer used as a construction office. Surrounding land uses inc1ude single family residential uses to the north, SDG&E easement to the east, the City's Fire Department training tower and future fire station to the south and an area designated for open space is Iocated to the southwest. There are no sensitive plant or animal species on-site and no cuItural resources wouJd be impacted by the proposed project. IV. COMP ATIBll..ITY WITH ZONING AND PLANS The present PC designation is OS-3 (open space district) and the Site Utilization Plan designates the site as Community Facility. AIthough the project site is designated as Community Facility it does not fo= part of the Community Purpose Facility planning program. The City and the applicant always considered the existing use (home sales office) to be temporary in nature until such time as a more permanent and acceptable use was adopted. Therefore, a proposed amendment to this designation would not constitute removal of land for future community facilities. With the proposed establishment of a new Commercial District in the PC District Regulations, the opportunity will be provided to detennine with more precision and appropriateness the list of specific uses to be permitted, conditionally permitted and those not permitted. The corresponding General PIan/Specific PJan designation proposed would be Commercial-Retail. No conflicts with the proposed zoning and h:\home\planning\lindab\cir8301.adm 3D Pagc;:2 Genera! Plan/Specific PJan designations are noted. V. IDENTIF1CATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 1. Public Services Impacts Fire The nearest Fire Station is to be ¡ocated adjacent to the project site. This station could provide service to the site within 3 minutes. The Fire Department can adequateJy deliver service to the site without an increase in equipment or personnel. The Fire Department states that additional comments will be provided when detailed development plans become available. Police Department The estimated response times on minutes and 13 seconds for Priority I calls and 9 minutes and 8 seconds for Priority 2 calls are above the recommended thresholds. Staff at the Police Department indicate that adequate police service will be provided to the area and no mitigation is required. Upon the availability of specific site plan development, the Police Department recommends a security evaluation by crime prevention personnel. 2. Utilitv and Service Systems Noise No significant noise impacts are expected to result from the proposed retail use of the project site. The nearest residences are located at a considerable distance to the north across Rancho Del Rey Parkway. Schools This project is in CFD #3 and alJ properties are assessed to fully mitigate impacts on school facilities. Traffic The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur h;\hom~\plannjng\lindab\cir£302.adm 3{ Pag~3 -...- ..--------- ------ --- during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Ko intersection may reach an LOS "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this policy. The proposed project would compJy with this TIrreshoJd Policy. The City Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that it would not adversely affect the existing level of service on roads or intersections in the area. The project would be associated with a Level of Service "c" for Paseo Ranchero, Rancho Del Rey Parkway and East "H" Street both before and after project completion Direct access to the project site is via Paseo Ranchero off of East 'H' Street. Paseo Ranchero makes a T-intersection with Rancho Del Rey Parkway which also provides access to the project site. Drainage The Engineering Department has determined that proposed RdR SPA I and GP A amendments to the site will have no significant impacts to the existing building or site. A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Sto=water Permit will not be required because the project is part of a larger co=on plan of development (EIR 87-01 - EI Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan Amendment) that results in than five acres of solid disturbance. A Sto=water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPP) will not be required for the project. Soils No Soils Report will be necessary at this time. , Open Space .). No impacts to open space are noted. VI. CONCLUSION Public service and traffic impacts are found to be Jess than significant for the proposed project with confo=ance to alJ City requirements regarding fire, poJice and school facilities. Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above discussion, I hereby find that the project revisions to the proposed project will resuJt in onIy minor technicaJ changes or additions which are necessary to make the Environmental Impact Report adequate under CEQA. h:\home\p1anning\lindab\eir830Z.adm 3'2- Pagç-4 __ _ __ _ _^_ _."._'..M'___"_·__ 4--r{ØL( DougJas . ReId Environmental Review Coordinator REFERENCES Chula Vista General Plan (1989) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code City of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures EIR 87-01-EI Rancho Del Rey (December 15,1987) h:\homc\pJanning\lîndab\cirS302.adm 33 Pagc:,s Case No.IS-98-10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Name of Proponent: Rancho DeJ Rey lJ;¡vestors, L.P. 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth A venue ChuJa Vista, CA 91910 3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 2727 Hoover Avenue National City, CA. 91950 (619) 477-4117 4. Name of Proposal: RDR SPA I - Information Center GP A/ZC 5. Date of Checklist: November 24, 1997 Polenlially Potenlially Significanl Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Miligaled Impact Impacl L LAND USE AND PLANNING. IfOLl/o' the proposal a) Conllict with general plan designation or 0 0 0 ¡g¡ zoning? b) Conllict with applicable environmental 0 0 0 ¡g¡ plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Affect agricultural resources or operations 0 0 0 ¡g¡ (e.g., impacts to soils or farllÙands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement 0 0 0 ¡g¡ of an established community (including a low-income or minority co=unity)? 3'+ Page No. 1 ----~- ]JuleliliiJIJ)' Pol~r¡Lié.r y SigniriciJnt l.ess limn Srgnifi:znl Unless Significanl No Jmpid Mili{:ölcd impact Im mcl Comments: Alternative land uses to the existing information center presently used as a home sales office would eventually need to be evaluated. The proposed neighborhood commercial designation appears to be compatible with the prominent Jocation of the project site and the surrounding land uses. With the proposed establishment of a new Commercial District in the PC District Regulations, the opportunity will be provided to determine with more precision and appropriateness the list of specific uses to be permined, conditionally permined and those not permined. The corresponding General Plan/Specific Plan designation proposed would be Commercial-Retail. No land use conflicts with the proposed zoning and General Plan/Specific Plan designations are noted. II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or 0 0 0 181 local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 181 directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially 0 0 0 181 affordable housing? Comments: The proposed project will not induce population growth or displace housing. The project proposes a change to the existing land use designation of a developed 1.6 acre sIte. III. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in 0 0 0 181 geologic substructUres? b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or 0 0 0 181 overcovering of the soil? c) Change in topography Dr ground surface 0 0 0 181 relief features? d) The destruction, covering Dr modification 0 0 0 181 of any unique geologic or physical features? -- Page No.2 35 ...---.- ]lolel1tÌi:!iy !;¡¡l(:ntii:¡]ly SlhlJiflCíJfJL J.c:'>.<;l}!iJ1I Sjg Jifj~1::nt Ullle:-.'S Significant ." Imp~d MiligiJlcd Impacl Irnpnc:l e) A:rly increase in wind or water erosion of 0 0 0 ~ soils, either on or off the site? f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach 0 0 0 ~ sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay inlet or lake? g) Exposure of people or property to geologic 0 0 0 ~ hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Comments: The site has been fully graded. The average slope of the site is 2%. The site is fully developed with an existing 2,380 sq. ft. building and a paved and landscaped parking lot. A:rly future development project would need to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage 0 0 0 ~ patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water 0 0 0 ~ related hazards such as flooding or tidal ~raves? c) Discharge into surface waters or other 0 0 0 ~ alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in 0 0 0 ~ any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course of 0 0 0 ~ direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? 3& Page No.3 __n"__ r)Dlel1liiJ!ly POlCfitli1IJy Sí¡.:niflciJlll 1¡.:s."UJiJII SlgnifJ::.t:nl lJl1lexs Signiricí.lnl Nn Imp.íld Mjli¡:;illt:d Impi;lcl Jrnpi;lcl f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, 0 0 0 ~ either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of 0 0 0 ~ groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 ~ i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood 0 0 0 ~ waters? j) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 ~ water otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: The engineering department indicates that no adverse impacts to drainage are noted since there is an existing structUre and the site is fully developed. They further note that the existing off-site drainage facilities are adequate to serve the site. The project will not be required to develop and implement a storm water pollution plan (SWPP). No significant impacts to water or drainage are noted. V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or 0 0 0 ~ contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 ~ c) Alter air movement, moisture, or 0 0 0 !81 temperature, or cause any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d) Create objectionable odors? 0 0 0 ~ e) Create a substantial increase in stationary 0 0 !81 0 or non-stationary sources of air emissions or the deterioration of ambient air quality? 37 Page No.4 ~___m -- - --".._~-~-~~.._.._..,,------ l!olclllliJll}' 1'()L~fjL;Í ,l!y 5i::[]irlciJl1l I.(:s~ Limn Sj:::f:ifl:i::nL Unlt~ Signiricanl No Jrnpi:l::l Mili~;¡lcd Impacl Impar:l Comments: Based solely on the project size of 1.6 acres, the Engineering Department estimates that a neighborhood commercial center would generate 1500 new vehicular trips. This figure represents the worst case scenario. The full utilization of the project site is limited by the existing SDG&E easement which extends over about half of the site. However, based on the existing 2,380 sq. ft. building the proposed use would be expected to generate 225 new trips per day. Even with the worst case scenario the number of calculated new trips would still not be considered significant enough to cause adverse impacts to air quality. No other impacts to air quality are noted. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic 0 0 [8 0 congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features 0 0 0 ¡:g¡ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 ¡:g¡ nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off- 0 0 0 ¡:g¡ site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or 0 0 0 ¡:g¡ bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 ¡:g¡ alt=ative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 ¡:g¡ h) A "large project" under the Congestion 0 0 0 ¡:g¡ Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips.) 30 P8£.e No.5 --"----~... ----~---_." ,-.----- -----~-_._--,._-- --- ---"_. ]¡olt:J!lI'J!ly J;(Jl~ntli: Y Si~l!jrJc¡¡ ]l 11.:~than Si~nirl::onl Unlc:-;s Significilnl '0 Impi:d MiLil.:illt~d Impöcl Impöd Comments: See discussion above under Air Quality. The traffic generated would not adversely impact the surrounding primary access roads including Paseo Ranchero, Rancho Del Rey Parkway and East "H" Street. These would all remain with an L.O.S. of' C'. No adverse impacts to traffic or circulation are noted as a result of approval of the proposed project. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of 0 0 0 181 concern or species that are candidates for list· ~ mg. b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 181 trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities 0 0 0 181 (e.g, oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and 0 0 0 181 vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 181 f) Mect regional habitat preservation 0 0 0 181 planning efforts? Comments: The project site and surrounding develòped area are located in a fully urbanized community which contains no land valued for habitat. The site has been fully graded and includes a 2,380 sq. ft. building and paved and landscaped parking lot. No animal or plant species listed as rare, threatened or endangered by local, State or Federal resource conservation and regulatory agencies are known to be present in this highly disturbed area. No adverse impacts to biological resources are noted. VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 181 plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful 0 0 0 181 and inefficient manner? 31 Page No.6 -.-.- .._--._."w·_______~_____ ------_.~.._- ]/olcnlliJJly ¡lJl~:n lli::1 i Y Si¡:!lIirlei!nt Less lhi1n Si~nif¡::i'llIl Unlcss Significanl No Impi:d Mili~íll(:d impacL 1mlmcl C) If the site is designated for mineral resource 0 0 0 ~ protection, will this project impact this protection? Comments: No impacts to non-renewable resources are noted. IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 12!:1 hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 12!:1 response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or 0 0 0 12!:1 potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0 12!:1 potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with 0 0 0 12!:1 flammable brush, grass, or trees? Co=ents: Project approval would not pose a health hazard to humans. No hazardous materials or substances will be permitted to be stored on site for any proposed use. Therefore, there cannot be a risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset condition. x. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 12!:1 0 b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 12!:1 0 -'10 Page No.7 n_ n___ ~--,-_.... l)oLc:I¡Li¡¡ j' 'oLenLií1!Jy Significant 1/.::;sLhill1 Slgnifr~aßt Un t:~ SignifictJlIL "" Imp"cl ~ iliJ:tlLcd Imptlcl Impí1c:l Comments: There are no sensitive noise receptors immediately adjacent to the project site. The residential dwelling units located north of the project site are buffered from this site by Rancho del Rey Parkway and a six foot block wall. The proposed neighborhood commercial land uses would not represent significant generators of noise. No adverse impacts regarding noise are noted. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 !81 b) Police protection? 0 0 0 !81 c) Schools? 0 0 0 !81 d) Maintenance of public facilities, including 0 0 0 !81 roads? e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 !81 Comments: The project would not have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services. 0 0 0 !81 XII. Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact the Cizy 's Threshold StanMrds? As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seen Threshold Standards. a) Fire/EMS NI A 0 0 0 !81 The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista Fire Department indicates that this threshold standard will be met. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. /.f( Pag~ No.8 --_._-~- !JulclllliJlly 'oL!:I:LJi:ljy Signiflcilnt Jcs.~ limn Sjgnifl~nl Ullle~ Signific¡:¡nl "" Imp",l MiligiJll:d ImpacL ImpàcL Comments: The Fire Department indicates that the property adjacent to the project site is designated for a future fire station. This station will provide service to the site within 3 minutes. The Fire Department will review and comment on any future construction plans. b) Police 0 0 0 181 The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The Police Department response time for both Priority 1 and Priority 2 calls within the vicinity of the proposed project are above the recommended Threshold Standard. Comments: The police Department however, indicates that adequate service can and is being provided to the project site and surrounding area. .AJ:J.y proposed construction plans should be forwarded to the crime prevention unit for evaluation. c) Traffic 0 0 0 181 The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of I-80S are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Comments: No adverse impacts to traffic/circulation are noted from project approval. d) Parks/Recreation 0 0 0 181 The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/l,OOO population. This Threshold Standard does not apply to the proposed project. Comments: No adverse impacts to parks or recreational opportunities are noted. e) Drainage 0 0 0 181 1'L Page No.9 .....--- "---" --.-._..._----~"_.~-" ... ------_....~."...._,---"_.- PolellliiJI!y IJnltr:LJ~ Jy S ~njric:¡ nt Less tlmn SiglJifl::ilnl Unh:!>S Slgnificanl No Imp~d Mili¡::ilLr:d Impact Jmpid The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project does comply with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The Engineering Department indicates that existing off-site drainage facilities are adequate to serve the proposed project subject to review and approval of any proposed grading and construction plans. £) Sewer 0 0 0 ¡g The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The proposed project is not expected to create a need for any new utilities or servIce systems. The Engineering Department indicates that existing sewer facilities are adequate to serve the proposed project. No impacts to sewers are noted. g) Water 0 0 0 ¡g The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project does comply with this Threshold Standard. Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building perIDlt lssuance. Comments: No adverse impacts to water quality are noted from project approval. XIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: . t.¡3"" Page No. 10 o ...".m_ --.-.----. _0 _ __.__________ ._n______________ ~---- 110Lcnli¡¡lly !)oltnt¡c.liy Si,::nìh¡:ant Less limn Si¡::nifl:Dnt Ul1lc::::.<; Si¡::nific¡ml ~o ImpiJd Milig¡¡lcd Impact Impad a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 [g¡ b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 [g c) Local or regional water treatment or 0 0 0 [g distribution facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 [g e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 [g f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 [g Comments: This project will not result in a need for new systems, nor result in alterations in any utilities. XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to 0 0 0 [g the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? b) Cause the destruction or modification of a 0 0 0 [g scenic route? c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic 0 0 0 [g effect? d) Create added light or glare sources that 0 0 0 [g could increase the level of sky glow in an area or cause this project to fail to comply with Section 19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 19? e) Reduce an additional amount of spill light? 0 0 0 [g I/-t{ Page No. 11 ,.__._'.m_'-- _._._..~'_ J1olenlí;¡II)' I'DLtr.ti¡,lIy 5i~¡¡jrir.¡J l J.css thön Slgniri=.anl Unless Si¡::nificiJlll No Imp;cl Mili(iillcd Impacl ImpiJd Comments: The project site is presently developed with a 2,380 sq. ft. building with noteworthy architectural features which complement the overall theme of the Rancho del Rey development. If in the future the site were to be developed with new structures, these would be subject to the requirements of the Design Review Comminee process which along with other adopted standards for Rancho del Rey would ensure the project be in harmony with existing development. xv. CULTIJRAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of 0 0 0 !81 or the destruction or a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical 0 0 0 !81 or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c) Does the proposal have the potential to 0 0 0 ~ cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious 0 0 0 ~ or sacred uses within the potential impact area? e) Is the area identified on the City's General 0 0 0 !81 Plan EIR as an area of high potential for . archeological resources? Comments: The project site is fully developed and disturbed by human activity. No . adverse impacts to cultural resources are noted. XVI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. 0 0 0 !81 Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of paleontological resources? Comments: No paleontological resources have been identified on or near the project site, which is located in a fully developed urban sening. XVII. RECREATION. Would the proposal: 1~ Page No. 12 . _._.~_.- ....~-- II¡¡leJI[j¡Jlly lol!::;:Ji1liy SigJlirtc;Jul /~S'S Uwn SlglLifi:i:nl Unless Sit:nifjci]nl hD Impil::l MiLi¡::aLcd ImpiJcL Imp¡,d a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 [g regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 I8J c) Interfere with recreation parks & 0 0 0 [g recreation plans or programs? Comments: No impacts to Parks or Recreational Plans are noted. XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declaration for mandatory findings of signi;þance. If an EIR is needed, this section should. be completed. a) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 I8J degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining leve1s, threaten to eliminate a plant or onimol community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods or California history or prehistory? Comments: The project site is in a fully developed urban setting. The project site has been completely disturbed by human activity. No impacts to wildlife population, habitat or cultural/historical resources are noted. b) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 I8J achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Comments: The project does not have the potential to achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals. The project will be consistent with the Zoning and General Plan/Specific Plan designations for the site. -<ib Page No_ 13 ----.-^.-- Jnll:lIlliJ iy "OL!:I::liI!Jy Signj[ ciml I/~!\::; lhiJl1 Slgf:ifl~ilnl Unless Si:::nifi¡;¡Jl1l ND Im¡:'ild ldiligiJlcd Imp¡,cl Imp¡ cl C) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 ~ individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (" Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Comments: The project does not have any impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. Project approval will result in the orderly transition of land use for an existing developed site. d) Does the project have environmental effect 0 0 0 ~ which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: The analysis contained in the Initial Study found no evidence indicating the project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES: Comments: The proposed project is not associated with any significant or potentially significant environmental impacts with regard to any specific category, therefore no mitigation over and above standard City requirements will be required. Project Proponent Date ?(7 Page No, 14 __.._~~___._ "'.__... _.."...__.__.___. _._._______.._____..__........_.. ".." _. _.0.__..__ xx. E1\TVIR01\'ME1\rrAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. o Land Use and o T ransportation/ Circulation o Public Services Planning o Population and o Biological Resources o Utilities and Service Housing Systems o Geophysical o Energy and Mineral o Aesthetics Resources o Water o Hazards o Cultural Resources o Air Qualii)' o Noise o Recreation o Mandatory Findings of Significance XXI. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the .~ environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0 environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an anached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the 0 environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ~g Pagf: No. IS ...-- - -_.__._--_.---_..-~,._-"-- I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the 0 environment, but at least one effect: 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a ·potentially significant impacts· or "potentially significant unless mitigated." AIl ENVIRONMENTAL llv1PACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0 environment, there Wll.L NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. AIl addendum has been prepared to provide a record of this determination. Si~;¡;¿(iJL/ /J!.Þlh7 I / ' Date Environmental Review Coordinator City of Chula Vista tf9 Page No. 16 - --~.._----_.._--- ---". ---------- "._-,,-- THIS PAGE BLANK 50 " -,41TIICHMEÆlI 3 RESOLUTION NO. PCM-98-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA I PLAN BY 1) CREATING THE C-2 COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICT, 2) CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 820 PASEO RANCHERO TO THE NEWLY CREATED C-2 COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICT FROM ITS CURRENT OS-3 OPEN SPACE DISTRICT DESIGNATION, AND 3) ADDING AND MODIFYING THE PERMITTED, CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED LAND USES APPLICABLE TO THE C-1 AND C-2 COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICTS WHEREAS, a duly verified application, PCM-98-09, for a Miscellaneous Amendment was filed with the Chula Vista Planning Department on September 15, 1997 by Rancho del Rey Investors, LP ( Applicant); and WHEREAS, said application requested the creation of the C-2 Commercial Center District, a change of the land use designation for the 1.6 acres of land located at 820 Paseo Ranchero to the newly created C-2 Commercial Center District, and adding and modifying the permitted, conditionally permitted and prohibited land uses applicable to the C-1 and C-2 Commercial Center Districts as specified in Exhibit A, attached hereto ( Project); and WHEREAS, subject property consists of approximately 1.6 acres of land and is located at 820 Paseo Ranchero (the southwest corner of Rancho del Rey Parkway and Paseo Ranchero) in the City of Chula Vista, as diagrammatically presented on the area map attached hereto as Exhibit B ( Project Site ); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said amendment application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m. on December 10, 1997 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator determined that the Project falls under the purview of EIR-87-01 and that an addendum to this environmental impact report is the only environmental document required for this project, as documented in IS-98-10. H:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIf'.,"\RDR\SP Al \9809PC.RES 57 . -- -~.- -, - Resolution No. PCM-96-14 Page #2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT from the facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission has determined that the amendment to the Rancho del Rey Sectional Planning Area I Plan creating a new land use district called C-2 Commercial Center District, designating the property located at 820 Paseo Ranchero as C-2 Commercial Center District, and modifying the permitted, conditionally permitted and prohibited land uses applicable in the C-1 and C-2 Commercial Center Districts is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice supports the redesignation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council enact an ordinance to create the new land use district to be called C-2 Commercial Center District, redesignate the Project area to C-2 Commercial Center District, and modify the permitted, conditionally permitted and prohibited land uses applicable in the C-1 and C-2 Commercial Center Districts, in accordance with the attached City Council Ordinance. And that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the property and the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 10th day of December 1997 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: O'Neill, Ray, Tarantino, Thomas, Willett NOES: Aguilar ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Davis ~~~" 52- Ho\HOME\PLANNINGIMARTIN\RDRISP Al "I!09PCRES ~u __. _".,__,_.._.__.__._~__ ____~_u_·_ ,.... _...__~_._..,,_,__ - RESOLUTION NO. GPA-98-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION FROM OPEN SPACE TO COMMERCIAL RETAIL, THE RANCHO DEL REY SPECIFIC PLANNING AREA I PLAN GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY FACILITY TO COMMERCIAL, AND THE SITE UTILIZATION PLAN DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY FACILITY CF-1 TO COMMERCIAL CENTER C-2 FOR THE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 820 PASEO RANCHERO WHEREAS, a duly verified application, GPA-98-01, for a General Plan Amendment was filed with the Chula Vista Planning Department on September 15, 1997 by Rancho del Rey Investors, LP ( Applicant); and WHEREAS, said application requested a change to the General Plan Designation from Open Space to Commercial Retail, the General Development Plan Designation from Community Facility to Commercial and the Site Utilization Designation from Community Facility CF-1 to Commercial Center C-2 for the property located at 820 Paseo Ranchero ( Project ); and WHEREAS, subject property consists of approximately 1.6 acres of land and is located at 820 Paseo Ranchero (the southwest corner of Rancho del Rey Parkway and Paseo Ranchero) in the City of Chula Vista, as diagrammatically presented on the area map attached hereto as Exhibit A ( Project Site ); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said amendment application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m. on December 10, 1997 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator determined that the Project falls under the purview of EIR-87-01 and that an addendum to this environmental impact report is the only environmental document required for this project, as documented in IS-98-10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT from the facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission has determined that the General Plan, General Development Plan and Site Utilization Plan designations should be changed for the H:\HOME\PLANNING\M.'\RTIN\RDR\SP Al \9BOIPC.RES 63 ._-_._._~--_._~---_."---_."--_. - - Resolution No. GPA-98-01 Page #2 property located at 820 Paseo Ranchero, as reflected in Ordinance No. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to change the General Plan designation from Open Space to Retail Commercial, the General Development Plan designation from Community Facility to Commercial and the Site Utilization Plan from Community Facility CF-1 to Commercial Center C-2 for the property located at 820 Pas eo Ranchero. And that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the property and the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 10th day of December 1997 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: O'Neill, Ray, Tarantino, Thomas, Willett NOES: Aguilar ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Davis 9~~~ ATTEST: ~~ Diana Vargas, sec~ H :\HO:ME\PLANNING\MARTOORDR\SP At \9801PC.RES sf - .._--_.---_...~--_.~--"---_..__...._-- - Planning Commission Minutes -9- December 10, 1997 5t or occupan a e year period. I is highly un ely 4. PUBLIC HEARING: .1) GPA 98-01 - Request for a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Designation from Open Space to Commercial Retail, the Rancho del Rey Specific Planning Area I Plan General Development Plan from Community Facility to Commercial and the Site Utilization Plan from Community Facility CF-1 to Commercial Center C-2 for the Property located at 820 Pa5eo Ranchero - Rancho deIReylnv~o~,lP 2) PCM-98-o9 - Proposal to Amend Chapter IX-B; Commercial Center District of the Planned Community Regulations of the Rancho de Rey SPA I Plan by: A. Creating the C-2 Commercial Center District; B. Changing the land Use Designation for the 1.6 acres of land at 820 Paseo Ranchero to the Newly Created C-2 Commercial Center District from its current 05-3 Open Space District Designation C. Adding and Modifying the Permitted, Conditionally Permitted and Prohibited land Uses Applicable to the C-1 and C-2 Commercial Center Districts. Chair Davis stepped down from the dais due to a potential conflict of interest. Background: Martin Miller, Acting Senior Planner, reported that the applicant, Rancho Del Rey Investors, lP, the owners of the Rancho Del Rey Information Center located at 820 Paseo Ranchero no longer have a need for the existing Information Center as most of Rancho Del Rey will be built out approximately over the next year. Because of the anticipated build out, they would like to market this property now for future sale. The current allowable land uses under a Community Purpose designation are highly restrictive and, therefore, the property owners are requesting the above-listed changes in order to broaden the permitted and conditionally permitted land uses for this parcel. The proposal is to establish uses that will allow the existing Information Center to provide services and minor commercial support facilities to the local residential neighborhood. In order to accomplish this, several amendments must first be approved; they are: A. Amending the General Plan, the RdR GDP, the SUP, and the land Use Districts Map. At present, the General Plan designation is Open Space, the RdR GDP designation is Community Facility, the SUP designation is Community Facility CF-l, and the land Use District Map zone is Open Space OS-3. 55"" .....-"-....---.-- .--,-."----------..---...--- . Planning Commission Minutes -10- December 10, 1997 B. Amending the Planned Community District Regulations. This entails the creation of a new district to be called Commercial District C-2 and specifying permitted, conditionally permitted, accessory and prohibited land uses for it. It should be noted that the Commercial District C-1 is currently applied to the Power Center area along East H Street. The C-2 District will differ from the C-1 District in that il is proposed to be targeted toward smaller, neighborhood-type uses, where the C-1 District is designed to accommodate more intense commercial land uses. In addition, where the C-1 District has been applied to a comparatively substantial area, the C-2 District will be limited to the 1.6 acre parcel where the Information Center is now located. Staff Recommendation: Thatthe Planning Commission accept the addendum resulting from 15-98-10 for EIR-87-D1 and recommend approval of GPA 98-01 and PCM 98-09, subject to the draft City Council Resolution approving the amendments to the City's General Plan Amendment and the Rancho del Rey Specific Planning Area I Plan's General Development Plan and Site Utilization Plan, and Ordinance approving the amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA I Planned Community District Regulations for the property located at 820 Paseo Ranchero. Commission Discussion: Commissioner Ray stated he served on the Resource Conservation Commission when the construction of the Information Center was originally brought forth. He recalls that the original intent of this building was that it would be a temporary structure with an Open Space overlay, however, if it were deemed appropriate, the property could be sold, and it would be reviewed again when the time came. Commissioner Aguilar requested to view a slide that depicts the noticing radius of this neighborhood. Public Hearing Opened 8:47 A. Y. Casillas, 791 Avenida de la Barca, Chula Vista, CA spoke in opposition to this proposal. He indicated that when they were first looking into purchasing their home, they were told by the sales representative that there would not be anything at that site other than the Information Center building and that some day in the future the building would be donated to the City. In addition, the perspective buyers were told there would someday be a library and a fire training center in the area. Mr. Casillas is also concerned with the added traffic congestion that any commercial use at this site would generate, adding to the traffic that will be generated with the completion of the YMCA. The area residents urge the Commission to be conservative when deliberating on the types of commercial uses that will be allowed at this site, and to seriously consider the impact on the quality of life the use would have on this community. Mr. Casillas also urged the Commission to not act hastily and suggested a public forum be held with the applicant, staff, and area residents to discuss the proposed uses and provide a means to voice their recommendations. 50 Planning Commission Minutes -11- December 10, 1997 Thierry DiMatteo, 799 Avenida de la Barca, Chula Vista, CA stated he was told by the developer at the time of purchase that nothing other than a day care center would some day replace the Information Center which is what the property was zoned for. Mr. DiMatteo is concerned with the added traffic congestion any commercial use will being to the area and opposes rezoning the site to commercial/retail in order to enhance the marketability of the building. Craig Fukuyama, 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City, CA representing the owner of the property, Rancho Del Rey Investors, LP stated that their goal has been to preserve the building, which has won numerous regional and local awards for architectural excellence and City Beautification. The building was constructed about ten years ago with the intent of using it as an Information Center and as part of the sales and marketing program and eventually vacating the building when the RDR development came to an end. The projections are that they will vacate the building by Spring of 1999. Mr. Fukuyama stated that they met with a couple of homeowners (Mr. Casillas and Mr. DiMatteo) and discussed what the Investors' goals and objectives were. Mr. Fukuyama further stated that the zoning of Open Space exists because at the time, the intention was not to have commercial zoning anywhere but within the business center, and for lack of declaring this site residential or park land; it carried an open space zoning. RDR Investors have been trying to market the building for the last two years and have approached a number of churches, but they've been unable to find the means to acquire the property. As previously stated, originally their intention was to convert the property into a child care center, however, they've discovered that the more contemporary child care facilities, like Children's World and La Petite Academy need a singular facility of approximately 10,000 sf in size. They have indicated that in order to utilize this property, they would have to demolish the building and construct a singular building outside the easement. With the objective of preserving the building because of its quality as well as itbeing somewhat of a landmark, they are trying to market the building offering an expanded list of uses. It is not their intent to create a zoning that resembles the CN zone, because it would be too extensive, but rather, a limited number of uses that would be neighborhood compatible, and those uses that potentially were not neighborhood compatible, that they carried a conditional use requirement. The site is nearly 1.7 acres and only half of the property is currently developed with the Information Center and the parking lot. The property is abutted on two sides by collector streets, which are designed to accommodate the kinds of traffic were talking about, including the YMCA. One advantage is that the entrance to the building faces away from the residential uses, which would confine parking areas and access points away from the residential area and face toward the fire station site. If a second building were to be built or an expansion to the Information Center were to occur to accommodate an office-type building or medical building, it would occur to the west with the parking areas confined to underneath the SDG&E easement. 57 ---- --_._--_._._._----~--~._.".,~-,-_. Planning Commission Minutes -12- December 10, 1997 Mr. Fukuyama stated that it was unfortunate that they underestimated the market for day care centers, and had they known the difficulty they would encounter, they would likely have rezoned the property before the residences were built. Mr. Fukuyama stated thaI a comment was made that RDR Investors could donate the site to the City and pointed out that they donated the 5 acre YMCA site and donated some of the improvements and grading and utilities that are on the site. They have dedicated the fire station and library site for public uses as well as the school. If the property is rezoned, RDR Investors would market the property to those uses and try to insist to the extent that they can, that the building be preserved and any new structure would be have to mimic and be as comparable in terms of architectural style with the existing building. Commissioner Willett asked if any State regulation would preclude a child care facility from being in close proximity to power lines. Mr. Fukuyama stated that with respect to public schools, that may be the case, because where the residences are today, is where the Discovery Elementary School originally was planned and the State Architects Office required them to move it 300 feet outside the SDG&E easement. Commissioner Tarantino asked Mr. Fukuyama to define convenience store. He responded that it would not include a Seven-Eleven type of convenience store, but would be more like a deli, or some other kind of shop that would be ancillary to an office complex. Considering the proximity of the school and the YMCA, as well as the limited hours of operation, this would most likely preclude a convenience market like Seven-Eleven because of the liquor license prohibition. In addition, he pointed out there is a department store use contained in the list, that is probably an oversight and should be excluded as a permitted use. Fred Estepp, 795 Avenida Solaria, Chula Vista, CA stated he supports comments previously made by the residents because he too was told the same thing when he was first looking ito buying a home in that area. Mark Haas, 790 Avenida de La Barca, Chula Vista, CA stated he was upset because of the noticing radius, which barely goes past his home because the rest of his street and everybody else that lives in this area, who would be directly impacted by this corner did not receive a notice. In addition, as a peace officer, he is personally aware of a Seven-Eleven store in South San Diego that closes at 11 :00 p.m. and opens as 6:00 a.m. Safety is of great concern to him because his experience has shown him that convenience stores attract kids, who in turn commit crimes known as "grab'n runs", where they grab an item and run to the nearest place where they can hide, which is into a residential area. He urged the Commission to not take action on this item and to hold a public forum where the entire neighborhood is noticed and they can give their input. 5"8' - --"- ----_.._---- -----.-..,- . _._._'"._----~--,~_.__._---_._--------~_.__._-_._-"-- Planning Commission Minutes -13- December 10, 1997 Ken Lee, Acting Director of Planning, stated that State law requires 300 feet noticing distance, which lilerally every jurisdiction in the County adheres to. The City of Chula Vista was at one time using 1,000 feet noticing radius and is presently down to 500 feet, which is well beyond what everyone else is noticing. Mr. Lee further stated that staff has no objection to holding a public forum and noticing the entire neighborhood that extends to the canyon. Public Hearing Closed 9:10 Commissioner Thomas stated he empathizes with the concerns the residents have raised and supports saving the building, which not changing the land use, almost guarantees the demolition of the building. Commissioner Tarantino stated that the constraints placed on the hours of operation are prohibitive enough that not even a video rental business like Blockbusters would be attracted because they have drop offs til midnight. Under the General Performance Standards, ·...A request for a 24-hour operation must be made on an application supplied by the Chula Vista Planning Department.' Commissioner Thomas stated the Planning Commission has the ability to grant or deny any conditional use permit on this property. Planner Miller stated that the CUP and Design Review could come back to the Planning Commission rather than the Zoning Administrator. The intent was that any land use that has the potential of cause any kind of impacts would come before the Commission and in some cases to the City Council. Mr. Miller stated that any applicant wanting to have a 24-hour operation would need to have it approved by the Zoning Administrator, but it could be required to come before the Planning Commission or City Council. Mr. Lee stated that the Commission could preclude the sale of liquor since they are drafting this ordinance. MSC (RayfThomas) (Chair Davis abstaining) recommending approval of GPA 98-01 and PCM 98-09 subject to the Draft City Council Resolution, approving amendments to the City's General Plan Amendments with the following preclusions under Permitted and Conditional Uses list starting on page 40 of Attachment 4. Exclude: #11. Drug Store, Pharmacy #12 Eating and drinking establishments: A. Restaurant, restaurant with coctail lounge, coffee shop, and full delicatessen (may serve alcoholic beverages) #14 Grocery, convenience, fruit or vegetable store Include an additional item under #12: D. Prohibit liquor sale in the C-2 zone, and Permitted in the C-1 zone; - that any conditional use permit on this property come back before the Planning Commission for approval; and - that no 24-hr. establishment be allowed. 5'7 ~·.___._'m"..".___.'."_ "" .--------.------,-...,-.--,--- ".".-...-.. - Planning Commission Minutes -14- December 10, 1997 Commissioner Tarantino questioned the wording of the motion and stated that in his opinion, listing the uses and changing them from 'C' to 'W as 'not permitted' is somewhat redundant, because all those listed under a conditional use permit would come back to the Planning Commission anyways. Mr. Lee pointed out that at Council's directive, in an attempt to move projects through the system, staff is trying to streamline Zone Variances and process a number of CUP's at staff level depending on the complexity. He reminded the Commission that they are literally structuring this ordinance to fit this site, and the Commission can specify that any items listed as Conditional Use Permits will require Planning Commission approval. Commissioner O'Neill expressed concern with placing excessive restrictions on the land use on this property; it is a prime piece of real estate situated in an area that is not directly surrounded by residents, and has adequate access by two collector streets which abutt the property. Commissioner Ray offer to amend his motion to include a condition that states that any use on the land come back to the Planning Commission for approval, and that can include pre-sale approval. Ann Moore, Assistant City Attorney stated that there needed to be some permitted uses and the property owner needs to have the ability to use the zone at some level. She further stated that the Commission could approve CUP's, but is not in a position to approve the developer's sale of the property. Mr. Miller recommended adding wording on Pg. 40 under iX-B.1 'Permitted & Conditional Uses' to read ·...The following uses shall be permitted uses where the symbol 'P' appears and shall be permitted uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit where the symbol 'C' appears, šUD¡ecfto!ñe"ãI?Rroval,ofthe;elar:l1:!.J.!1giiGommlsslorr" . Furthermore, Mr. Miller pointed out that there was no public forum held on this project, however, if the Commission wishes to proceed on this matter, staff is willing to conduct a public forum prior to this item going before the City Council. The commisssion concurred on both items. Commissioner Aguilar stated she empathized with the residents because they are now faced with an unexpected change which could potentially adversely affect their neighborhood. She also sympathized with RDR Investors in light of their failed attempt to market the building for use as a child care center, and current zoning limits its marketability. She further stated the need to develop creative mitigative measures such as raising the height of the wall which surrounds the residences, which could mitigate safety and noise pollution Issues. Commissioner Aguilar proposed that the public hearing be continued for three weeks to conduct a public forum with area residents. She further asked if Vice Chair Willett could re- open the public hearing to ask Mr. Fukuyama if RDR Investors would be agreeable to this. roo - _.."--- -----"----.-." -----... .--..--- -----.---- Planning Commission Minutes -15- December 10,1997 Ann Moore, Assistant City Attorney stated that re-opening the public hearing is at the discretion of the Chair, and could either be re-opened, or he could simply ask a question of a member of the audience, however, equal time would have to be allowed if there is anyone in the audience wishing to re-address the Commission. Commissioner Ray proposed to table this item for three weeks until the applicant and the residents can meet to discuss mitigating measures. Commissioner O'Neill pointed out that uses such as a day care center or church, allowed under the current zoning, would generate traffic impact as well. Commissioner Tarantino clarified his understanding of the motion as read and asked if the maker's intention was to change the "C" Conditional Use in the C-2 district, to "N" Not Permitted under land uses #11, 12a. and 14. Commissioner Ray responded, "yes". Commissioner Tarantino stated he could not support the motion. Vice-Chair Willett asked Mr. Fukuyama if he would be willing to respond to Commissioner Aguilar's request. Commissioner Aguilar asked Mr. Fukuyama if he would be agreable to continue this public hearing to hold a forum. Craig Fukuyama re-addressed the Commission and stated that RDR Investors desires to move forward on this application and would prefer not to continue this public hearing to facilitate holding a forum with area residents. He stated that they had already met with some of the residents. They would, however, be agreeable to participate in a forum that staff has indicàted they would be willing to hold between now and the time that this item goes to the City Council. Mr. Fukuyama stated that after hearing the Commission's deliberation and residents concerns, that they would not have a problem precluding any of the items that the motion listed as "non- permitted" uses under the C-2 district. The applicant would not commence a sale without disclosing all of the issues. The sale would be conditioned upon the Planning Commission granting a CUP or in some cases would be conditioned upon approval by the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission as well. No prudent buyer would buy the property without knowing that he would be able to use it for the purpose he intended. Mr. Fukuyama further stated that he was sorry that the residents were given inaccurate information by the former developer, UDC Homes. McMillin's sales representatives are prohibited from disclosing information that is not factual and they are specifically told what to disclose and what types of commitments the developer is able to make on the property. Vice Chair Willett called for the vote. (p( . ~-------_.- -~ -------_.._~~-_.~-~-_._"._-- Planning Commission Minutes -16- December 10, 1997 MSC (RayfThomas) 5-1-1 (Commissioner Aguilar voting against the motion and Chair Davis abstaining) recommending approval of GPA 98-01 and PCM 98-09 subject to the Draft City Council Resolution, approving amendments to the City's General Plan Amendments with the following preclusions under Permitted and Conditional Uses list starting on page 40 of Attachment 4. Exclude: #11. Drug Store, Pharmacy #12 Eating and drinking establishments: A. Restaurant, restaurant with coctail lounge, coffee shop, and full delicatessen (may serve alcoholic beverages) #14 Grocery, convenience, fruit or vegetable store Include an additional item under #12: D. Prohibit liquor sale in the C-2 zone, and Permitted in the C-1 zone; - that any conditional use permit on this property come back before the Planning Commission for approval; and - that no 24-hr. establishment be allowed. Motion carried. Chair Davis returned to dais. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: GPA 97-05/PCZ-97-Ð3 - 1) Amend the General Plan for the property located at 675 Oxford 'Street to change the designation from Open Space/Research & limited Manufacturing to Professional & Administrative Commercial; and 2) Rezone the property from R-1 (Res. Single Family) and Il-P (Industrial limited - Precise Plan overlay) to CO-P (Office Commercial - Precise Plan) - Palomar Station, llC Background: Martin Miller, Acting Senior Planner stated that the applicant is requesting an amendment to the Gerneral Plan and rezone of property at 675 Oxford Street from residential and limited industrial to office commercial. The property is zoned Il-limited Industrial with a Precise Plan Overlay. The inverted flag-shaped lot is vacant with primary access from Oxford St., however, there is potential for limited or constrained access from Naples Street over the pole portion of the flag lot. The applicant has tried unsuccessfuly to market the property as industrial land but has encountered difficulty in selling the property because of its proximity to Harborside Elementary School. The developer has come up with two potential development scenarios assuming approval of the General Plan Amendment and the rezone. One scenario would be to construct office buildings, and the second scenario is as a Conditional Use to develop it as multi-family. Either one of these land uses have more potential there considering the surrounding land uses. &7-. - . _.~~ ·- --------- - iì / , "- [ I i ,- j I I I , I ! ! i , , I S.O.G. & E I EASEMENT I DISCOVERY ELEMENTARY MARBRISAS APARTMENTS (12B) Y.M.C.A. OPEN SPACE PROJECT MARBRISAS LOCATION APARTMENTS (144) CITY OF CHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENT TRAINING TOWER "- & FUTURE LIBRARY SITE , \ S,\¢-0 \ ~ .~ \ ~'rS'\ r---. \ \- \ . \ t \ \ \ ~\\\ L \ ¿' '8 \ . ' \ \ / , . , ,II', ,~. \ Rl \~0\~\1 . I rF \ \ \ \ , ~ ',-----,--1 ~ C HULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR ~~~~: R,D.R.lnvestors LPIRDR PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C) AMENDMENTS PROJECT 820 Paseo Ranchero Request: Proposal to amend the PC Dis1rlct regulations in the R.DR SPA 1 ADDRESS: & General Plan Amendment from Community FaaTItyRelaJl. SCALE: ALE NUMeER: ú3 NORTH No Scaie PCM-9S-D9 Related Case: G?A-98-01 h:\home~lanning\carlos~o::ators~cm9S09.cdr 9/30/97 , C 1 I ~ ..... r' - 1'1" -. 'N ~ 1¡J ~.. !E 0.... ¡ I '.. .::=_ ~ r! !: ¡ É g ð!' ~ II ~J 1 : ¡ oJ'~ "" ....... it i'l : E c: 'I ,I. ~ I ...,.-," ,n I ! Ii!. , :. \,V .; :: ì I I. E !!! Is -: '-'-I: 0. _ __ o ,..-' <D ~ > - ,n t. _ \,V J _~_ o I 0.. . I . \ . -. t... m ". . \ \ --\ : \.:.......\ . \ , ,n :..:1 ~.... ~ \ ~ ¡:.:~ '\ C ""'.'j .... \ ~. ~~ 'J \,V ,:;~:'..' ......... (!) '1(' .i.I.-¡-- S Y i <~.} ~ 1M.» '-:" ~ "'-~ ' ·l /... ( ¡ . ;':. :'."'.... [...:\ ; . . . " . ,. .... \ ':.' ~ I'" .' \ ...... ................./ . c:---:!.. ...\ r- "'.. .............'.:J... .:.,......,..;. . ../ I /,,--- ......... ~':............. / " 1'1.,..... ì-::......;.~ I " ;;·ë/ ~. ~d?"..'>\\· It ~ . . / I.................... i' "- "." ......:.......... . '- ì"~" . \ S \ \. J: li·)·;~0-f~··..· \>~i~ '\ }....... \ ...\ ..,~..--. --_-J-(::O'.~.:.;"/? · viA ........ .. \ Q." .\':";"". ":"'.:: ¡ ~..., \".:.S:f :)~) S~ - -- ").\(l. ¡ fji I 0 I ";"::":>_'1 u _ -", ,. ..' DoS' ~I ¡.. . ." '. ··..·'~··..:I· 1: ; i .... .. ~ ;;; -: , I",: '.:: . !C L, --------~~ !1 --i ( .:\ ';, - .. +- \ .¡ '" ". -. . ..:~ ::. . ....,.0: 21-" ". .; '; '... __ _.......c....., .--..". .- ':"1 I; r~ .,. ¿¡ -'-1-·. --.i·-..~:.,: 'I·.. ~~ 1',.- --.'........51 ..... ~ Q_ .i I .. ", I' - .'. Q ,... ~ ..--'~. ....- \.. . -~ i 2 ¡ II"' ." c::: . I . I < ".. ,. . '" ' '. \ o· 0 ~ ~ I I" .,.. '. -= b ;;;;- ; ,II! . · ¡. " - - '" .. \..... .s .. !<;- õ.. ! ':10 "f ;¡" §§ .. ! ! ¡ '! ! f! "'. ~ .::- ,. · ,- !. it" , . ." go< ; : l. l l. l :1.1 '" 011: .. Iò- ! .: ..' = ..... , ',': . u _ ' , U" I - ;: ~ i ~. ::: . , '- - . ð I . ¡, " 1\ :,- '·1' ¡, ! I . f' j. ¡ â ~~ ':' ': ~ - ':-:) i ..i' D .... 0 ; '£ ,~I II a II .. i :1.1 iii or.. ! tI ] ¡:--;-> m'li I I i l: t··.· 'Ii ;a i '::ul iÕ¡" ' UP:-;·'.R7¡ . is: · l..:..:.J LJu 2 c.D....:..EJL: ! <I: &1 . --~ ~--- ------------.- -"_.-~."- CÜ i; r - . IT: . . ¡ t=I " - ~~ :B g; ~ ~ "'.. - - ð" . ~ r- ~::- : '" - .. _ . w .Q :;;:c",1:: r;. 'þ~ $ .t·t -r- ..... ~ t'~ cü ¡ ~ r t ~ î : : .N .. E '"' ..: ~ ;,; ~ ::::> L-...... G) '., f' ..... / ~) (¡) i···· '--.../ ¡ , . . ;- .. ;. ~-.- f i" ....... :' &.:/: t .". 'I' -:'. ¡ , "I -" ~ .' .. , : ,. .. , ! " . / f -!1'/~ , - l/ /.~ ',:_.,-, . ! "'0'/ It . '-' ,(. , -.~'-j/-- /: ... '\ ~)! .:....,,/-: ,.;, -\. ,", "_ 0 ý' .,. ." j-.-. ''"'-. . - \/V' \( '::'. :~;r~'::;D~~;'.';;~~{ .' \ .... J \ ~- .. .", '.' '-'4~:rc:;) ,": , .. :~::' .....:::::-.J<o.o. '.~ i( " :,.:., ."/';"..J-.- - ;- , ." \ ..... . . _ .~~ \ . _ r- '_1__ ~, , ',\ ~':;:':': .~.;-~_..,.~,\ ' . , !:i ., , i "J;;; .-" " ~ ... ... .. CI CO ... '" -: c "'? --: .. .. _ ... .. ... 01'" \ :! ;.'~' < ~=-"~""'~~22;;"~~"g:::: '. "" - ....: Ñ . \ .. '~J ' . ..-j , ' ) <...J ~ · ~ .. ... .. ~ ':!!: ;: .H' ~ c)-- s: ~ë~i":¡iË::.. c : . : .. iii ... Ii:'" ¡¡ 51 / ~ õ1 I- _:>...~...:'g1:CI. .......õõ 0 o Z ~~~;~~i!~ ~:¡fI::;::;:IiIfl:G' .-4- ¡:¡~ ~ i ¡ , í 1 ~ iI- 15 15:: 151515 ~ ( .- 003 t I: ~ i Þ ! ¡ ~ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ! .2 : » -;- ~ Ulug{)uo~fu~~5!8g8 :f\ ... I ~ ~ li~~~~~0~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ \r.\ :'~ -. ~8 c:..J ~ -: ':' ¡...;... '! -: !~ ..., '!' ":> .,.. ~ , ." II. ":' IL ...:.' . IL - <'!' ~ ":' .. .. .. .. .. ø .., 15 ºI ... () ~ jFu ~ ri.. II. .... ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~\ , ','1 '.. ~ c!~ \ jr.:i., ,. -Q~ "'-- & '\ . r--_ .. 0) C3 ê. \ , II! "2 ;" = ~ : ~ i ~ = ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ :: - r?:i -j -. \. t ii \' o - . _ 0 ~ " ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ " " . · 00 - " . ~ . ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~ ~ : · R ;;::;:;;;;~;;::: : ¡ · I . ~ 1.11/111 ~ L.iLHH~~ i -.-------- - <i!: i i S S 3 3 3 3 3 3 ¡¡ ~ Iii i f - ~".. ....·"~ip· i=<OOClCClClClOCCI;) C 05 [I Z-I.IIIi!.IIIIIIIB'..I>;.~ ::r::r -- ~ ~ii000"1~0n~~~~o~~~~ Ci5l" I" ".,... · . EJ· · :'::" ~ ! : . t w~ II: II: 11:110:::'0:: III: II: 10:: II: d: cl¡cll:J *= II: II: 01: ... a:: i~:""'" Lr i -~-_....._-----_. r/) ~ 0 - -2 ð*' ~ ~ . jl - ,^ , . UJ _ oð' W -- 8. ~ liS 1) J~ ffi I ~ rIG .....J / :~v ( ~ \. ~ I . ~ I !!/ , S J t 1& ( ! I ( . I { : '----. 1 ì " I \ ~ '\ } \ / ~- ~_/ \ I- I l_ I ! " \. /' ~ \ I S / ~ \\ ../ \ \ /' " '. I· \ -- '-"1 . '\ I , ) '-. ...-. r . ............:' .......... "'-"-.' a: ........ ,....--- -'- \ \ ~ . .' \ ~.g. . I ~ j \. ~ ü I- '\~. & :!! E tJ / 0 0 t ~ ~ í !- & c...... >. ð' i .. ::::!! : I ~:: ~ p \ ( r~"'8 o ~ ~ 10l i { t ~~ .. ~IU : I a (,):!: ... ~ I I) it:' ~ 1 . .. 0 III '" : I _« ; ~ i .. c:.: _I t; \ c:: U fiO-uw'-'_ t:. \ .. ~. IW~.. ~ G'! '\- 0..::: 0.. U)"'..zJ 11)....:.. .. ..... itõ ::'iõ~-< õuu~ ...: \j È ~5. o~:¡'-,:j ~~~;; ~w \ \ õ.. 0 ~..E<I(a: :>ððS ". _>. w: I) ..I~~u\U o";'';'''i' \ ~.." 1IJi, ;f -ctt:__ ~~~I'! .. ~ C :>- - CI:;¡;zw.... ....Ie < < ¡.. \ c~ ~ ~~~..:.t..i:: wt... i %2 oZc"'~ '" ~~ :5 : : w:: ¡ O,cq ~ ~ ~. . ~."O§'-' 2" ! BHìJ i ~[lliJ H i ~ 0 úi¡) (I ". .4 iTA C H Me /f.)/ c- CHAPTER IX-B, COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICTS IX-B.O Purpose In addition to the objectives outlines in Chapter VII, the Commercial District¡;¡gff~ M included to provide for a quality environment and to achieve a harmonious mixture of retail and service commercial uses. Specifically, the Commercial District is intended to meet the following objectives: -- To reserve appropriately located areas for retail stores, service establishments and offices, offering commodities and services required by residents of the city and its surrounding market area; -- To provide an opportunity and appropriate development stan- dards for larger warehouse/discount retail commercial and support facilities; -- To encourage retail and service commercial uses, and related support uses, to concentrate for the convenience of the public and for a more mutually beneficial relationship to each other; -- To provide adequate space to meet the needs of modern commer- cial development, including off-street parking and loading areas; - - To minimize traffic congestion and avoid overloading utilities by restricting construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the amount of land around them; and, -- To promote high standards of site planning, architecture and landscape design for commercial developments within the City of Chula Vista. A. Commercial District (C-l) This district is intended as an area for large scale retail commercial facilities, along with complementary support, recre- ation, and entertainment commercial uses, which can meet the high $i~W%$7 IX-B -1 07 ~--...-.__....._- --~. performance and development standards of the Rancho del Rey Planned Conununity. ª¥ C " ··:iill>"t t{C;2) .ø=t~ca: I4?1I.· :r¡1;c, .}'I Iii' ',', ............ . . . ......... ...... ...... :;;::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::;:::::::;:::::;:;:::::;:::::::;:;:;:::¡;:::;:::.:.;.:.;.;.-,". w~]¡5\¡êffi~g*,¡!j~!t¡ji~·ffi~.t~ttttt!gft*!'H,¡]if1;tlêêwgè~\i\5±±~!tB±~iggtt*~!ðiælê~¥~ ~BÞÆ#æ!fÆ~ô¡ií.#>t;¡i;11!B~±±Mt8)¡¡!§~!fft~¡æ~gÆê!i\~¡¡$i9$g;¡;¡I~~*Sqþg+;nggê~" I:X-B.l. PERMI:TTED AND CONDI:TI:ONAL USES The following uses shall be permitted uses where the symbol "pI! appears and shall be permitted uses subject to a Conditional Use ii¡i=1iiiii[i~~!~~~;;~;;;;~!~"~;'ill;!iI;!;I~i~¡~ appears. LAND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ Q"g A. Service and Commercial l. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic and/or office C N g¡; .¡;¡gþpmgþ;j;¡:;·tþ~;¡;@i;@·,!!&pfi;iJ;l:Ø P g 3, Automobile and/or truck services C N 4. Bakery , retail P Iij' 5. Barber or beauty shop P P 6 . Blueprinting and photocopying P C 7. Car washing establishment subject to provisions of Section 19"58.060 CVMC C N 8. Clothes cleaning pick-up agencies with incidental pressing P P 9 . Clothing sales P N $.z~M\':$!Þ' IX-B -2 &'1 "~._---_._~~-----~...- . "- --' --- .... .__._~.__._.._".._.,._.._-,. LAND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT .c..::..J.. ç;:¡ ,--, 10. Day care, nursery school C :1(. ll. Drug store, pharmacy p ¡¡¡: 12. Eating and drinking establishments: a. Restaurant, restaurant with cocktail lounge, coffee shop, and full delicatessen (may serve alcoholic beverages) p N b. Refreshment stands & snack bars within a building as accessory to permitted use p C c. Fast food restaurants with drive-in or drive-through p N dt Sa$i!iØf······áitØØb.ØX·····dbi!iMé:tlágé$ i{..·@i" ;¡¡ñi$~~i@tig¡¡¡iìig!¡:¡¡ffi;¡¡!tB¡;¡fIi~M ....< N .,.............................................-........................... 13. Gasoline dispensing and/or automobile service station C !if 14. Grocery , 9!f!1:W!3ß;¡¡~iW1f¡;¡;¡fruit or vegetable store p N 15. Health or athletic club C ç 16. Hotel, motel; subject to provisions of Section 19.58.210 CVMC C 5 17. Liquor store (package, off-site only) C N í%!2MZ!tt .............-........ IX-B -3 to; --~._.,,_._..- ---- ~----_.,,_._~ LAND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ ç¡A~ 18. Medical and dental offices, and clinics, medical, optical and dental laboratories, not including the man- ufacture of pharmaceutical or other products for general sale or distri- bution C C 19. Movie theater, multi-plex P W 20. Offices: administrative and execu- tive offices; professional offices for lawyers, engineers, architects; financial offices including banks, real estate and other general busi- ness offices P g 21. Plant nurseries and similar outdoor sales C C 22. Recreation, commercial including bowling alley, billiard parlor, skating rink, and miniature golf course subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.040 CVMC C W 23. The retail of such bulky items as furniture, carpets and other similar items P W 24. Retail distribution centers and manufacturer's outlets which require extensive floor areas for the stor- age and display of merchandise, and the high volume, warehouse-type sale of goods and uses which are related to and supportive of existing on-site retail distribution centers of manu- facturer's outlets. P N $Zg1iî$@ IX-B -4 ')0 -., _.'-..-~-.-...--.-----"------ LAND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ GF~ ... 25M §¡f§mÆê1!t¡®!'!t1:91!1f!¡¡¡ ..æB-p!!iï4@WAS:!fi'!a1fÆ8AAßkk§ B~!t"t';9MJSšlt1:91!l!?¡ g c 2px g!!'!:píi9n?+ê$!1:0tÆpg#$;Pj;;t¢¡;;¢¡!;øæ g c æ7;t mgj!¡¡j;£;Bn@·.·W¢4$\11gø¡Mii;;!:ÞØX g C *. Any other retail business or service 2jl¥ establishment supplying commodities or performing services which is deter- mined by the Planning Commission to be of the same general character as the above mentioned retail business or service uses and open during normal business hours of the above uses P P ~. Stores, shops and offices supplying 22M commodities or performing services for the residents of the city as a whole or the surrounding community such as department stores, specialty shops, banks, business offices, and other financial institutions and personal service enterprises P ~ B. Public and Semi-Public Uses l. Day nurseries, day care schools and nursery schools C g 2. Educational institutions, public or private including vocational schools C E. 3. Post offices and post office terminalsj1ì\9,\ii;!¡þg?f$$%Ý#P@§ C C 4. Recreation, private, semi-private, or commercial C ç íí.li¡ftZ~W IX-B -5 '71 '".-..---...-.-_.~.--~"- LAND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ ç.;¡¡ .-_. 5. Public and quasi-public uses appro- priate to the district, such as professional, business and technical schools of a public service type, but not including corporation yards, storage or repair yards, and warehouses C P , 6. School and studio for arts and crafts; photography, music, dance and art galleries, in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.58.220 CVMC C E .,. f!*$%~~¡2&¡~9#~8;¡;#1 c E 8; ª$@;;¡;!?iI§f¡¡¡ffæ~Wæ~;¡;g~¡¡¡ihg@~8B!!EÆRr~ ç w §jfE;¡;!1!t!Ê:m~Hm§!fiWææE~!f@¡;¡æ±i!iEiÆff~¡ ~H8~!fMH¡¡¡ï!î*$I¡;;¡i!iË¡¡¡8¡;¡ï!îH&~œâi¡~~ @ p M'1A 8!?i8æfljl¡!IB!t~!fûÊ:¡;¡ì!tfu\fB±2ih$œÆ~BEÆjfH~ @ c "1-. Any other public or semi-public use $Ji; which is determined by the Planning Commission to be of the same general character as the above permitted uses C E c. Accessory Uses 1. Accessory structures and uses located on the same lot as permitted or conditional use p P 2. Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage facilities p P $%iI,¥t~7 IX-B -6 17- ---------.- LAND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ 0"2 3. Incidental services for employees on a site occupied by a permitted or conditional use, including day care, recreational facilities, showers and locker rooms P E 4. Roof mounted satellite dishes subject to the following standards or conditions: P E a. The dish shall be screened using appropriate matching architectural materials or parapet walls; b. Dishes shall be of a neutral color, match the building, or as otherwise approved by the City; c. A building permit shall be required; and, d. No advertising material shall be allowed on the satellite dish antenna. Satellite dish antennae containing advertising material shall be considered signs. D. Temporary Uses l. Temporary uses as prescribed in Chapter XI P Ii IX-B.2 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following property development standards apply to all land and buildings other than accessory buildings authorized in the Commercial District. Any legal lot may be used as a building site, except no building permit shall be issued for any lot having a lot size less than 10,000 square feet. ~Z¡¡%Z¡¡!t ......... n... IX-B -7 13 -- -~--- "- ----"------..-.-----.---.-.- A. General Requirements The following requirements are minimums unless otherwise stated: Development Standard l. Lot area, net sq. ft. (OOO'S)' 10 2. Lot width (feet) 100 3. Lot depth (feet) 100 4. Front yard setback (feet) 25' 5. Side yard setback, each (feet) 102 6. Public street ROW setback (feet) 20 7. East TlHTI St. ROW setback (feet) 607 8 . Rear yard setback (feet) 102 9. Rice Canyon top of slope setback 50 Bldg/20 Parking (feet) 10. Building height, maximum'" 35 feet or 2 stories, whichever is less 11. Maximum lot coverage (percent of net lot) · 40 12. Parcels 1, 3 and 4 should have a minimum of 100,00 sq.ft . single tenant building. <-'~:*»~k:';';':'__~^":·""':«*:«~:-»:-»:*»'_"'h."'_";':':':««*:««O»:-:«·:« »>......__..._~-_.-.-»."".,...«««<.;.:.:.:.:.". 1 Map for condominium development does not need to meet lot area requirement. Minimum lot area may be reduced to 10,000 sq. ft. for master planned building complexes with Precise Plan approval. Such Precise Plans shall be for a total area of no less than 60,000 sq. ft. 2 May be reduced to zero (0) with Site Plan approval. 3 Heights which vary from these standards may be approved via a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approval. 4 Open space lots or other special setbacks along East "HI! Street shall be included in the adjacent building lot area for purposes of the lot coverage calculation. S Architectural feature, entry identification, or roof-top screening allowed to 50 ft. in height 6 Refer also to Design Guidelines for individual parcel criteria. , Existing lots 4,7 & 8 of Final Map # 12267 (T.T. Map 88-2) shall have a minimum of 40 foot East "HI! St. ROW setback for building less than 100,000 square feet. The East "H" St. building setback for all lots shall be used as a landscape buffer area. Any encroachment into this area for parking, driveways, or hardscape shall be subject to the approval of the Design Review Committee. ~IZ~W~'l IX-B -8 1( ... ,._~~~~~-~---~ _._~..--~--_._--- B. Special Requirements 1. Along all street frontages situated across from any residen- tially zoned property, the use of berms, fences, and landscap- ing shall be used consistent with the Business Center Design Guidelines. 2. Streetscapes shall be enhanced to provide an easy transition from the street to the building. Patios, circulation and parking spaces can be included in setback areas to help buffer adjoining parcels from one another. 3 . For Lots 1 and 3 of Subdivision 93-01 and Lot 1 of Subdivision 92-05 the minimum building size shall be 100,000 square feet and shall be occupied by a single user. IX-B.3 GENERAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The following performance standards are general guidelines intended to describe the overall minimum design standards for the Commercial Center. The design guidelines which occur in Chapter VI of the SPA Plan and the separate Employment Park/Commercial Center Design Guidelines text provide specific recommendations. A. Landscaping In the Commercial District the required front and exterior side (street side) yard setbacks shall be landscaped. Parking, driveways, and other decorative hardscape areas will be permitted within the required rear yard, interior side yard, East "R" Street, and Rice Canyon top-of-slope setbacks. (Refer also to Business Center Design Guidelines for areas abutting Rice Canyon), Landscap- ing shall consist predominantly of plant materials and shall be irrigated by automatic sprinklers. All planting and irrigation shall be in accordance with the City's Landscape Manual and the Business Center Design Guidelines. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained in a clean, healthy and thriving condition, free of weeds, trash and debris. ~:7~î4~1 IX-B -9 1)' B. Equipment All ground mounted mechanical equipment, including heating and air conditioning units and trash receptacle areas, shall be completely screened from view of surrounding properties. (See also Business Center Design Guidelines) C. Utilities All utility connections shall be designed to coordinate with the architectural elements of the site so as not to be exposed except where required by utility provider. (See also Business Center Design Guidelines) D. Electrical Disturbance, Heat and Cold, Glare No use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which creates changes in temperature or direct glare, detectable by the human senses without the aid of instruments, beyond the boundaries of the site. No use shall be permitted which creates electrical disturbances that affect the operation of any equipment beyond the boundaries of the lot. E. Fire and Explosive Hazard All storage of and activities involving inflammable and explosive materials shall be provided with adequate safety and fire fighting devices to the specifications of the Uniform Fire Code. All incineration is prohibited. Adequate smoke detectors shall be installed in all new construction. F. Noise 1. General The acceptable outdoor noise exposure levels, measured at the property line, for the Employment Park Districts are given in the table below. (See Chapter 19.66 CVMC for definitions and additional details.) Exterior Noise Limits* Receiving Land Use District 8 am - 10 pm 10 pm - 8 am ~Z~ijiti;¡tt IX-B -10 '7{;' ___ __"__m C- 65 dbA 60 dbA *Environmental Noise - Leg in any hour *Nuisance Noise - not exceeded at any time Noise generated by activities within the Commercial District shall not exceed the noise standard for a residential district measured at the boundary of the receiving residential dis- trict. Refer also to Title 19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code for more specific noise attenuation requirements. All truck loading and unloading shall be conducted indoors or, if outdoors, in a manner or in a location which meets the noise performance standard for the C-1 District. Noise attenuation measures ( sound wall, enclosures, operation restrictions, etc. ) shall be provided to acoustically screen or otherwise prevent unacceptable noise impacts to residential development. In order to assure that the proposed attenuation measures are adequate, a Noise Study shall be submitted for the proposed project with the Design Review submittal or delivery operations shall be prohibited from 10 pm to 7 am weekdays or 8 am on weekends. 2. Paging/PA Systems Outdoor sound systems for music and/or paging shall be prohibited. G. Odor No use shall be permitted which created odor in such quantities as to be readily detectable beyond the boundaries of the site. H. Radioactivity In the Commercial District, the use of radioactive materials shall be limited to measuring, gauging and calibration devices, and medical X-ray diagnostic equipment. I. Vibration No use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which generates inherent and recurrent ground vibration percepti- ¡¡I~¢/¡¡it IX-B -11 17 ble, without instruments, at the boundary of the lot on which the use is located. J. Condominium Conversion In the Commercial District, the conversion of a project to condominium ownership shall meet all the requirements of the zone to the maximum extent possible. Specific City Council waiver shall be required where the zone requirements cannot be met. K. Air Pollution There shall be no emission on any site, for more than one minute in any hour, of air contaminants which, at the emission point or within a reasonable distance of the emission point, is as dark or darker in shade as that designated as No. 1 on the Ringelman Chart as published in the United States Bureau of Mines Information Circular 7718. L. Outdoor Storage and Sales Outdoor storage areas shall be entirely enclosed by visual barriers to adequately screen views from the external boundaries of the property. Permanent outdoor sales areas shall be screened to improve site aesthetics when viewed from a distance, but the screening materials are not required to be solid or opaque, and may allow filtered close-range views of the materials for sale. Screening design and materials shall be consistent with the architecture/materials of the adjacent building (Refer also to Business Center Design Guidelines) . M. Energy Conservation Buildings shall be located on the site to provide adjacent buildings adequate sunlight for solar access when practical. Buildings should be designed to minimize energy consumption. N. Toxic Materials No land or building shall be used or occupied in any manner which creates an unhealthful, dangerous, noxious or otherwise objection- able condition due to the use, storage or proximity to toxic materials. ~7¢$%$)1 1f IX-B -12 ------..--....-- - --- _._-~.__._---- . ..---.....-------- O. Liquid or Solid Waste The discharge or deposit of liquid or solid wastes shall be subject to the provisions of Section 19.66.150 CVMC. P. Aesthetic Standards l. All uses at the perimeter of the Commercial District shall be landscaped to provide a buffered transition to adjacent uses. 2 . Visual appearance shall be a principal consideration in the approval of Conditional Use Permits, especially any uses involving outdoor storage or activity. Consideration should be given to all prospective vantage points, including residen- tial areas which may be at a higher elevation. Q@ ~~~IIff~ft!S~)tîÞ#~~g :§P;!!~p;~!!$ ~gIIt1~~¥~~RB¡,!'tÞm~mifi~mffiê!t#~Ë*IBmî¡I±!!i~g~!I!~~¥r\i¡¡¡~~¡*I!!i~;ttí?~H¡êIg.~ ~!!i!ÊE~n¡~f·~¡I~%ê!ÊM~~¡'ffm¡¡!f1t±!Ê3êII3~Ëffi~¡¥Ë~;¡¡æÃtfli1í11í1#írt1~~m~¥tt~ ftgtt~g-~~mi!i1t~B¥#fIi!tg#¡~#~~!ÊêÞêg#I¡[!I~r~1ttÃt'.~!?:'íf#III~4~~Ittjf'íf# í?~#fliÞffig~!!!-,ê!tm~m~~~gng~Æg!ílWjj¡gfli!tffig~!2!gl±ffi~%¡m~Þm~íæ©!f;¡¡fIi Ÿ1Æêg~IR¡¡¡Æ1t¡ifftg-¡R!Êg~ffiÞm~~¥¡ IX-B.4 COMMERCIAL CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS In addition to the standards promulgated herein, Design Guidelines for the Rancho del Rey Business Center shall be adopted by the City of Chula Vista to further refine and implement these zoning regulations. All development within the Commercial District shall be subject to Design Review as provided in Section 19.14.582 CVMC. The following are primary design standards which are further refined and implemented through the Design Guidelines. A. Fencing Where a fence or wall is required adjacent to Rice Canyon for noise attenuation, screening or other purposes, it shall be a decorative masonry or concrete wall which is consistent with the community wall design standards found in the Design Guidelines. At interior site locations, fencing design and materials shall be consistent with the requirements of the Design Guidelines. ¡¡V¡¡~l~! IX-B -13 11 - -----_._,------,..._...._.._------_.~.- B. Parking All parking areas delineated on the approved Site Plan shall be maintained for parking purposes, unless a modified site plan is approved. Temporary uses, for which a temporary use permit has been secured, may utilize parking areas as allowed by the temporary use permit. c. Site Lighting All light sources shall be shielded in such a manner that the light is directed away from streets and adjoining properties. Illumina- tors shall be integrated within the architecture of the building. Lighting plans shall be submitted and approved as a part of the Design Review process. Such plans shall be evaluated utilizing the criteria set forth in the Design Guidelines. E. Architectural Standards An architectural theme has been established for the Rancho del Rey Community. A complementary theme has been established for the Commercial Center (C-l District) . This theme is described and standards/guidelines for various building and site design elements are set forth in the Business Center Design Guidelines. The intent of these standards is to induce the repetitive use of common designs and building elements to create a unified aesthetic, both for this district and the community as a whole. The proposed architectural design for each project shall be evaluated for consistency with the adopted Business Center Design Guidelines through the Design Review process. . IX-B.5 SIGNS No sign or outdoor advertising structure shall be permitted in the Commercial District except as provided in Chapter XII or herein. Additional standards and regulations for signs are provided in the Business Center Design Guidelines. All permitted or approved signs within this district shall be consistent with the Commercial Center provisions of the Business Center Design Guidelines. ~%~it%@1: fð IX-B -14 ___n_ --....- .._--~-~--_.._---_._- -- - - -_._~._- CHAPTER IX-B: COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICT I IX-B.O Purpose In addition to the objectives outlines in Chapter VII, the commercial District is included to provide for a quality environ- ment and to achieve a harmonious mixture of retail and service commercial uses. Specifically, the Commercial District is intended to meet the following objectives: -- To reserve appropriately located areas for retail stores, service establishments and offices, offering commodities and services required by residents of the city and its surrounding market area; -- To provide an opportunity and appropriate development stan- dards for larger warehouse/discount retail commercial and J support facilities; -- To encourage retail and service commercial uses, and related support uses, to concentrate for the convenience of the public and for a more mutually beneficial relationship to each other; -- To provide adequate space to meet the needs of modern commer- cial development, including off-street parking and loading . areas; I· -- To minimize traffic congestion and avoid overloading utilities by restricting construction of buildings of excessive size in relation to the· amount of land around them; and, -- To promote high standards of site planning, architecture and landscape design for commercial developments within the city of Chula vista. A. Commercial District (C-1) This district is intended as an area for large scale retail commercial facilities, along with complementary support, recre- ation, and entertainment commercial uses, which can meet the high performance and development standards of the Rancho del Rey Planned Community. I £/ IX-B-l ________ _" _._.____M__._.~._____~.__~~~_ IX-B.1 PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES . , The following uses shall be permitted uses where the symbol lip" appears and shall be permitted uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit where the symbol "C" appears. Uses are not permitted where the symbol "N" appears. LAND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT C-1 A. Service and Commercial l. Animal hospital or veterinary clinic and/or office C 2. Automobile and/or truck services C 3. Bakery , retail P , 4. Barber or beauty shop P 5. Blueprinting and photocopying P 6. Car washing establishment subject to provisions of Section 19.58.060 CVMC C I· 7. Clothes cleaning pick-up agencies with incidental pressing P 8. Clothing sales p 9. Day care, nursery school C 10. Drug store, pharmacy p 1l. Eating and drinking establishments: a. Restaurant, restaurant with cocktail lounge, coffee shop, and full delicatessen (may serve alcoholic beverages) p b. Refreshment stands & snack bars within a building as accessory to permitted use p c. Fast food restaurants with drive-in or drive-through P 12. Gasoline dispensing and/or automobile ! service station fZ- C IX-B-2 ~ - -.--,.,- --- --_._--~_.-- IJ..ND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 13. Grocery, fruit or vegetable store p 14. Health or atheletic club C 15. Hotel, motel; subject to provisions of Section 19.58.210 CVMC C 16. Liquor store (package, off-sale only) C 17. Medical and dental offices, and clinics, medical, optical and dental laboratories, not including the man- ufacture of pharmaceutical or other products for general sale or distri- bution C I Movie theater, multi-plex 18. P 19. Offices: administrative and execu- tive offices; professional offices for lawyers, engineers, architects; financial offices including banks, real estate and other general busi- ness offices P 20. Plant nurseries and similar outdoor sales C 21. Recreation, commercial including bowling alley, billiard parlor, skating rink, and miniature golf course subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.040 CVMC C 22. The retail of such bulky items as furniture, carpets and other similar items P 23. Retail distribution centers and manufacturer's outlets which require extensive floor areas for the stor- age and display of merchandise, and the high volume, warehouse-type sale of goods and uses which are related to and supportive Of existing on-site retail distribution centers of manu- facturer's outlets. P \ f3 IX-B-3 . ~_......,.,.._- -- --.--.-. --_._----~-~~.._--- --.-- LJ..ND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT \ 24. Any other retail business or service establishment supplying commodities or performing services which is determined by the Planning Commission to be of the same general character as the above mentioned retail business or service uses and open during normal business hours of the above uses P 25. Stores, shops and offices supplying commodities or performing services for the residents of the city as a whole or the surrounding community such as department stores, specialty shops, banks, business offices, and other financial institutions and personal service enterprises P B. Public and Semi-Public Uses 1- Day nurseries, day care schools and nursery schools C 2. Educational institutions, public \ or private including vocational schools C 3. Post offices and post office terminals C 4. Recreation, private, semi-private, or commercial C 5. Public and quasi-public uses appro- priate to the district, such as professional, business and technical schools of a public service type, but not including corporation yards, storage or repair yards, and warehouses C 6. School and studio for arts and crafts; photography, music, dance and art galleries, in accordance with the provisions of Sectipn 19.58.220 CVMC C 7. Any other public or semi-public use which is determined by the Planning Commission to be of the same general character as the above permitted , uses C IX-B-4 trY ._~._. '. -.- ---_._,._--~-----_...._---- LÞ.ND USE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT \ c. Accessory Uses l. Accessory structures and uses located on the same lot as permitted or conditional use p 2. Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage facilities p 3. Incidental services for employees on a site occupied by a permitted or conditional use, including day care, recreational facilities, showers and locker rooms p I 4. Roof mounted satellite dishes subject to the following standards or conditions: p a. The dish shall be screened using appropriate matching architectural materials or parapet walls; \. b. Dishes shall be of a neutral color, match the building, or as otherwise approved by the City; c. A building permit shall be requi;ed; and, d. No advertising material shall be allowed on the satellite dish antenna. Satellite dish antennae containing advertising material shall be considered signs. D. Temporary Uses l. Temporary uses as prescribed in Chapter XI p \ IX-B-5 is- _.'_..._.__..__m_~_.__~__ IX-B.2 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS \ The following property development standards apply to all land and buildings other than accessory buildings authorized in the Commercial District. Any legal lot may be used as a building site, except no building permit shall be issued for any lot having a lot size less than 10,000 square feet. A. General Requirements The following requirements are minimums unless otherwise stated: Development Standard 1- Lot area, net sq. ft. (000'5)1 10 2. Lot width (feet) 100 3. Lot depth (feet) 100 4. Front yard setback (feet) 256 I 5. Side yard setback, each (feet) 102 6. Public street ROW setback (feet) 20 7. East "H" St. ROW setback (feet) 607 \ 8. Rear yard setback (feet) 102 9. Rice Canyon top of slope setback 50 Bldg/20 Parking (feet) maximum3,s 10. Building height, 35 feet or 2 atories, whichever is less 11- Maximum lot coverage (percent of net lot)' 40 12. Parcels 1, 3 and 4 should have a minimum of 100,00 sq. ft. single tenant building. ¡Map for condominium development does not need to meet lot area requirement. Minimum lot area may be reduced to 10,000 sq. ft. for master planned building complexes with Precise Plan approval. Such Precise Plans shall be for a total rrea of no lesa than 60,000 sq. ft. May be reduced to zero (0) with Site Plan approval. 3aeights which vary from these standards may be approved via a Conditional Use fermit and Site Plan approval. setbacks along "a" shall be Open space lots or other special East Street included in the adjacent building lot area for purposes of the lot coverage falculation. Architectural feature, entry· identification, or roof-top screening allowed to 50 ft. in height · Refer also to Design Guidelines for individual parcel criteria. 7 Existing lots 4,7 & 8 of Final Map # 12267 (T.T. Map 88-2) shall have a minimum of 40 foot East "H" St. ROW setback for building less than 100,000 square feet. The East "H" St. building setback for all lots shall be used as a landscape buffer area. Any encroachment into this area for parking, driveways, or hardscape shall be subject to the approval of the Design Review Committee. IX-B-6 f0 B. Special Requirements 1. Along all street frontages situated across from any residen- tially zoned property, the use of berms, fences, and landscap- ing shall be used consistent with the Buisness Center Design Guidelines. 2. Streetscapes shall be enhanced to provide an easy transition from the street to the building. Patios, circulation and parking spaces can be included in setback areas to help buffer adjoining parcels from one another. 3. For Lots 1 and 3 of Subdivision 93-01 and Lot 1 of Subdivision 92-05 the minimum building size shall be 100,000 square feet and shall be occupied by a single user. IX-B.3 GENERAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS . The following performance standards are general guidelines intended to describe the overall minimum design standards for the Commercial Center. The design guidelines which occur in Chapter VI of the SPA Plan and the separate Employment Park/Commercial Center Design Guidelines text provide specific recommendations. A. Landscaping \... In the Commercial District the required front and exterior side (street side) yard setbacks shall be landscaped. Parking, driveways, and other decorative hardscape areas will be permitted within the required rear yard, interior side yard, East "H" Street, and Rice Canyon top-of-slope setbacks. (Refer also to Business Center Design Guidelines for areas abutting Rice Canyon), Landscap- ing shall consist predominantly of plant materials and shall be irrigated by automatic sprinklers. All planting and irrigation shall be in accordance with the city's Landscape Manual and the Business Center Design Guidelines. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained in a clean, healthy and thriving condition, free of weeds, trash and debris. B. Equipment All ground mounted mechanical equipment, including heating and air conditioning units and trash receptacle areas, shall be completely screened from view of surrounding properties. (See also Business Center Design Guidelines) C. utilities All utility connections shall be designed to coordinate with the architectural elements of the site so as not to be exposed except where required by utility provider. (See also Business Center \ Design Guidelines) 67 IX-B-7 .-.- ,-.~-_....~._.__._,-~-_._-~- D. Electrical Disturbance, Heat and Cold, Glare \ No use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which creates changes in temperature or direct glare, detectable by the human senses without the aid of instruments, beyond the boundaries of the site. No use shall be permitted which creates electrical disturbances that affect the operation of any equipment beyond the boundaries of the lot. E. Fire and Explosive Hazard All storage of and activities involving inflammable and explosive materials shall be provided with adequate safety and fire fighting devices to the specifications of the Uniform Fire Code. All incineration is prohibited. Adequate smoke detectors shall be installed in all new construction. F. Noise , 1. General The acceptable outdoor noise exposure levels, measured at the property line, for the Employment Park Districts are given in the table below. (See Chapter 19.66 CVMC for definitions and additional details.) "- Exterior Noise Limits. Receiving Land Use District 8 am - 10 pm 10 pm - 8 am C-1 65 dbA 60 dbA ·Environmental Noise - Leq in any hour *Nuisance Noise - not exceeded at any time Noise generated by activities within the Commercial District shall not exceed the noise standard for a residential district measured at the boundary of the receiving residential dis- trict. Refer aslo to Title 19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code for more specific noise attenuation requirements. All truck loading and unloading shall be conducted indoors or, if outdoors, in a manner or in a location which meets the noise performance standard for the C-1 District. Noise attenuation measures (sound wall, enclosures, operation restrictions, etc.) shall be provided to acoustically screen or otherwise prevent unacceptable noise impacts to residential development. In order to assure that the proposed attenuation measures are adequate, a Noise Study shall be submitted for the proposed project with the Design Review submittal or delivery operations shall be prohibited from 10 pm to 7 am weekdays or 8 am on weekends. \ ff IX-B-8 - ----.-.--------..- - ------ -..---------.-- -_._-----_._..--.~.,--~-~. 2. Paging/PA Systems ¡ Outdoor sound systems for music and/or paging shall be prohibited. G. Odor No use shall be permitted which created odor in such quantities as to be readily detectable beyond the boundaries of the site. H. Radioactivity In the Commercial District, the use of radioactive materials shall be limited to measuring, gauging and calibration devices, and medical X-ray diagnostic equipment. I. vibration No use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which generates inherent and recurrent ground vibration percepti- ble, without instruments, at the boundary of the lot on which the use is located. J. Condominium Conversion In the Commercial District, the conversion of a project to l condominium ownership shall meet all the requirements of the zone to the maximum extent possible. Specific City council waiver shall be required where the zone requirements cannot be met. K. Air Pollution There shall be no emission on any site, ·for more than one minute in any hour, of air contaminants which, at the emission point or within a reasonable distance of the emission point, is as dark or darker in shade as that designated as No. 1 on the Ringelman Chart as published in the United States Bureau of Mines Information circular 7718. L. outdoor Storage and Sales Outdoor storage areas shall be entirely enclosed by visual barriers to adequately screen views from the external boundaries of the property. Permanent outdoor sales areas shall be screened to improve site aesthetics when viewed from a distance, but the screening materials are not required to be solid or opaque, and may allow filtered close-range views of the materials for sale. Screening design and materials shall be consistent with the architecture/materials of the adjacent building (Refer also to Business Center Design Guidelines). , , f9 IX-B-9 ----"-----.------..--,.-- ------ ---------- ..~._._---.--"-. M. Energy Conservation \ Buildings shall be located on the site to provide adjacent buildings adequate sunlight for solar access when practical. Buildings should be designed to minimize energy consumption. N. Toxic Materials No land or building shall be used or occupied in any manner which creates an unhealthful, dangerous, noxious or otherwise objection- able condition due to the use, storage or proximity to toxic materials. O. Liquid or Solid Waste The discharge or deposit of liquid or solid wastes shall be subject to the provisions of Section 19.66.150 CVMC. P. Aesthetic standards 1. All uses at the perimeter of the Commercial District shall be landscaped to provide a buffered transition to adjacent uses. 2. Visual appearance shall be a principal consideration in the approval of Conditional Use Permits, especially any uses involving outdoor storage or activity. consideration should \ be given to all prospective vantage points, including residen- tial areas which may be at a higher elevation. IX-B.. COKMERCIALCENTER DESIGN STANDARDS In addition to the standards promulgated herein, Design Guidelines for the Rancho del Rey Business Center shall be adopted by the City of Chula Vista to further refine and implement these zoning regulations. All development within the Commercial District shall be subject to Design Review as provided in Section 19.14.582 CVMC. The following are primary design standards which are further refined and implemented through the Design Guidelines. A. Fencing Where a fence or wall is required adjacent to Rice Canyon for noise attenuation, screening or other purposes, it shall be a decorative masonry or concrete wall which is consistent with the community wall design standards found in the Design Guidelines. At interior site locations, fencing. design and materials shall be consistent with the requirements of the Design Guidelines. B. Parking All parking areas delineated on the approved site Plan shall be \ maintained for parking purposes, unless a modified site plan is approved. Temporary uses, for which a temporary use permit has IX-B-10 Cj() --_._-_..._~- -_.__._._--_._--_._-~-_._- - -_..."- been secured, may utilize parking areas as allowed by the temporary use permit. c. site Lighting All light sources shall be shielded in such a manner that the light is directed away from streets and adjoining properties. IllUIllina- tors shall be integrated within the architecture of the building. Lighting plans shall be submitted and approved as a part of the Design Review process. Such plans shall be evaluated utilizing the criteria set forth in the Design Guidelines. E. Architectural Standards An architectural theme has been established for the Rancho del Rey community. A complementary theme has been established for the Commercial Center (C-l District) . This theme is described and standards/guidelines for various building and site design elements I are set forth in the Business Center Design Guidelines. The intent of these standards is to induce the repetitive use of common designs and building elements to create a unified aesthetic, both for this district and the community as a whole. The proposed architectural design for each project shall be evaluated for consistency with the adopted Business Center Design Guidelines through the Design Review process. \ IX-B. 5 SIGNS No sign or outdoor advertising structure shall be permitted in the Commercial District except as provided in Chapter XII or herein. Additional standards and regulations for signs are provided in the Business Center Design Guidelines. All permitted or approved signs within this district shall be consistent with the Commercial Center provisions of the Business Center Design Guidelines. \ IX-B-ll c¡¡ .__....__.._._..,--~"...._---- - --- THIS PAGE BLANK --".---- ........----.-..----.-.---..--..-..... _.."'" .4 TrA-CH JJ {¿ JJT ~ " CHAPTER X: OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS X.O PURPOSE These districts are intended for open space, 1 and scapi ng, recreation, and public uses. Only those additional uses which are complementary to, and can exist in harmony with, open space are permitted. There is no lot size limi- tation and it is intended that this district may be applied to a portion of a lot provided that the remainder of the lot meets the requirements for which it i s zoned. In addition to the objectives outl ined in Chapter VII, the Open Space Dis- tricts are included in the Planned Community District Regulations to achieve the following purposes: --To preserve open space for the conservation of natural resources; --Maintain the natural character of the land; --Provide for public/quasi-public and recreational uses; --Conserve areas of hi storic and community si gni fi cance for the enjoyment of future generations; "'. --Provide for private use of land under limited development; and --Promote public health and safety. X.l· PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES The fo 11 owi ng uses shall be permi tted uses where the symbol "P" appears and shall be permitted subject to a Conditional Use Permit where the symbol "C" appèars. Uses where the symbol "A" appears shall be subject to an Admini- strative Review. Land Use OS-1 OS-2 OS-3 Arboreta - (Horticultural Garden) A P P Christmas tree sales A A A Commercial Recreation - - A Day Care Facilities* - - P Fruit and vegetable stands C - A Incidental Concessions A A P Par"s P P P Places of Worship - A P Public and Quasi-public uses C P P Recreation Facilities P P P Tract signs and offices, temp. A A A ,~ ,- Tree farming A A A Utilities (public and private) P P P *Subject to City Ordinance cr~ X-l ....._--_..-,-- ...--.--.....,,--.--- THIS PAGE BLANK crt(- ___ __ ___ _____~__~___,___~__..__.m__" .A77A-c ff M £JJT 7 Chapter 19.34 CoN - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMEROAL ZONE Sections: 19.34.010 Putpos~ and int~nt. 19.34.020 Permitt~d uses. 19.34.030 Condirional uses. 19.34.040 Sign regularions. 19.34.050 Height requirements. 19.34.060 Area, lot width and yard requirements. 19.34.070 Additional conditions and requirements. 19.34.080 Enclosures reqWr~d for all uses-Exceptions. , 19.34.090 Restrictions on sales of goods. 19.34_100 Site plan and architectural approy¡¡) reqWr~d. 19.34.110 Off-street parking and loading facilities. 19.34.120 Employee activity restrictions. - 19.34.130 Market analysis required when. 19.34.140 Curb cuts and internal traffic circu!ation-Approy¡¡) required. 19.34.150 Shopping centers-Presentation as planned development r~qWred. 19.34.160 Design of buildings. 19.34.170 Hours for conducting business. 19.34.180 Evidence of c~ain complianc~ required annually. 19.34.190 Trash storage areas. 19.34.200 Wall requirements. 19.34.210 Landscaping. 19.34.220 Proh.ibited uses. 19.34.230 Existing nonconfonning shopping centers-Conformanc~ with rules and regulations requir~d when-Tim~ limit. 19_34.240 Performanc~ standards. 19.34.010 Purpose and intent. The purpos~ of this chapt~r is to provide a shopping center for convenienc~ shopping in a r~sidential neighborhood where analysis of residential population demonstrates that such facilities ar~ necessary and desirable.. CoN zoning shaH be applied to property having a minimum area of three acres and a maximum area of eight acres. It is the intent of the city council to insur~ that the character of the CoN zone will be compatibl~ with and will complement the sUITounding residential area. Therefore, parking ar~as must be landscaped as required herein, in order to relieve the baITen appearance which most parking lots possess. It is further the intent of this article to prescribe the number, type, size and design of aH signs to protect the general welfare of the sUITounding residential property owners and of the merchants and property owners within the shopping center by avoiding wasteful and cosrIy competition among sign users resulting from the uncontroHed use of signs. (Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(A)). 19.34.020 Permitted uses. The foHowing are the principal permitted uses in a C·N district: A. Grocery, fruit or vegetable store; B. Bakery; C(S .... ,,~ .. f1' ,., ,,,,,,_. ___._.__ --~. C. Drugstore; D. Barbershop and beauty shop; E. dothes-cleaning pickup agencies with incidental pressing; F. Business or professional office; G. Restaurant, cafe or sorla fountain, not including entertainment, dancing or sale ofliquor, beer, or other alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises or drive·in car service; H. Commercial parking lots for passenger vehicles, subject to the requirements of Section 19.62.010 through 19.62.130; , I. Coin-operated laundry, with maximum capacity washing units of twenty pounds and comparable drying equipment, and clothes cleaning agency; J. My other retail business or service establishment supplying commodities or perfonning services for residents of the neighborhood which is detennined by the planning commission to be of the same general character as the above-mentioned retain business or service uses, and open during nonnal business hours of the above uses; K. Accessory uses and buildings customari1y appurtenant to a pennined use, such as incidental storage facilities and satellite dish antennas in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.22.030 Fl-9; L Agricultural uses as provided in Section 19.16.030. (Ord. 2526 §2,1992; Ord. 2108 §1 (part), 1985; Ord. 1356 §1 (part), 1971; Ord.1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(B)). 19.34.030 Conditional uses. . The following uses shall be pennined in the CoN zone, provided a conditional use pennit is issued in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.14.060: A. Automobile service stations, in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.58.280; B. Sale of beer or other alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises only where the sale is incidental with the sa1e of food; C. Electrical substations and gas regulator stations, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.140; D. Unclassified uses, see Chapter 19.54; . Roof-mounted satellite dishes subject to the standards set forth in Section 19.30.040; F. Recycling collection centers, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.340; G. Automated, drive-through car washes in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.58.060; H. Establishments contained in the list of pennined uses above, but which include the sale of alcoholic beverages for off·site use or consumption, including any new facilities and any facilities which expand qe" (R 9/93) '1}\fod -'"'--- ------~.. .~_.__.".._--~- the area devoted to alcohol sales or which require the issuance of a type of alcoholic beverage license by State Alcohol Beverage Control different from the license previously heJd, .in accordance with the procedw-es in Section 19.14.030; I. Liquor store (package, off sale only), in accordance with the procedures in Section 19.14.030. (Ord. 2560 §3, 1993; Ord. 2552 §1, 1993; Ord. 2526 §3, 1992; Ord. 2491, §2, 1992; Ord. 2252 §2, 1988; Ord. 2233 §2, 1987; Ord. 2152 §1 (part), 1986; Ord. 2108 §1 (part), 1985; Ord. 1571 §1 (part) 1974; Ord. 1356 §1 (part), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(C)). 19.34.04Q Sign regulations. .' See Sections 19.60.020 and 19.60.030 for pennit requirement and approv¡¡l procedure. A. Types of signs allowed: Business (wall and/or marquee and freestanding sign) subject to the following: .- . 1. Wall and/or marquee: Each business shall be allowed a combined sign area of one square foot per lineal foot of building frontage facing a dedicated street or alley; however, the sign may be increased to a maximum of one and one-half square feet per lineal foot of building frontage provided the sign does nor exceed fifty percent of the background area on which the sign is applied as set forth in Secrion 19.60.250; Each business shall be allowed signs facing on·sire parking areas for five cars or more and walkways ten feer in width. Such signs may contain a sign area of one-half square foot per lineal foot of building frontage. The maximum sign area shall nor exceed twenty square feer per business. 2. Freestanding (pole): A freesranding pole sign shall be subject to the following: a. Each neighborhood shopping center or shopping complex consisring of one parcel or contiguous parcels shall be allowed one freesranding pole sign, (in existing developed shopping centers a freesranding service srarion sign shall be allowed to remain and will nor be included in derennining the roral number of signs allowed), b. Signs are restricted to those lots having a minimum frontage of one hundred feet on a dedicared street. In the case of corner lots, onJy one frontage shall be counred, c. Maximum heighr, twenty·five feer, d. Maximum sign area, one hundred square feer, e. Minimum ground clearance, eight feet, f. The sign may projecr a maximum of five feer inro rhe public right.of-way, g. The sign shall maintain a ten-foor serback fr.om ¡¡II interior property lines, h. Freesranding pole signs less than eighr feer in height are restricted to a maximum sign area of twelve square feer and shall maintain a minimum serback of five feer from all streets, 97 1187. _(t) 0 10-.3~_ _ i. Only the name of the commercial complex and four tenant signs, or a tot~1 of five tenant . signs, may be displayed on the sign. Where the pole sign is used to identify the name of the complex or the major tenant, the sign shall be designed to identify all proposed tenants up to the maximum number allowed herein. The minimum sign area allocated for each tenant shall be not less than ten square feet; 3. Ground (monument): A low-profile ground sign may be used in lieu of a freestanding pole sign. The sign shall be subject to the following~ a. Maximum height, eight feet, b. Maximum sign area, fifty square feet, .- c. The sign shall maintain a minimum setback of five feet from all streets and ten feet n-om all interior property lines, d. The sign structUre shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the tI!'lin building and constructed with the same or similar materials; B. Other signs: See Chapter 19.60 for the following signs: Window (Section 19.60.270); canopy (Section 19.60.280); temporary construction (Section 19.60.290); tempor~ry promotional (Section 19.60.300); public and quasi-public (Section 19.60.310); sign bo~rds ~nd buildings (Section 19.60.330); directional (Section 19.60.340); warning and instructional (Section 19.60.350); service station price signs (Section 19.60.360); directory (Section 19.60.370); real estate (Section 19.60.380); unclassified uses (Section 19.60.400); signs on mansard roofs (Section 19.60.410); sign on pitched roofs (Section 19.60.420); business (Section 19.60.430); signs on architectural appendages (Section 19.60.440); and theater marquee (Section 19.60.450); 1. Signs on screening walls or fences: In lieu of a freestanding sign, a sign may be applied to a wall or fence used for screening of parking areas. The sign shall be subject to the following: a. The sign may only denote the name of the principal business or the name of the commercial complex, b. Maximum sign area, twenty-five square feet; C. Other regulations: All signs are subject to the regulations of Sections 19.60.040 through 19.60.130 and the standards of Sections 19.60.140 through 19.60.210; D. Nonconfonrung signs: See Sections 19.60.090 through 19.60.120. E. The design review committee may reduce sign areas below those authorized above b~sed on the sign guidelines and criteria cont~ined in the design mañual. (Ord. 2309A §7, 1989; Ord. 1734 §1, 1977; Ord. 1575 §1 (part), 1974; Ord. 1356 §1 (part), 1971; Ord. 1275 §1 (part), 1970; Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(D)). . 19.34.050 Height requirements. No principal building shall exceed two and one-half stories or thirty·five feet in height, and no accessory building shall exceed one and one·half stories or fifteen feet in height, except as provided in Section 19.16.040. (Ord. 1356 §1 (part), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(E)). C¡g . .lR.~L9.31 __.1..'''.~.P _..~_..._._--------------_.~_._- 19..34.060 Are:4, lot width and yard requirements. - The following minimum lot area and yard requirements shall be observed in rhe CoN zone, except as provided in Sections 19.16.020 and 19.16.060 through 19.16.080, and where increased for conditional uses: Setbacks in Peet Lot area* Front &: En. (Sq. Ft.) Side Yards Side Rear 5,000 15'* for None, except whe.'1 abuning None, except when buildings a residential district, abutting an R district 0' for signs rhen not less rhan rhen not iess rhan fifteen feet fifteen feet; provided however that where such yard is contiguous and parallel wirh an alley one-half rhe width of such alley shall be assumed to be a portion of such yard *or not less rhan rhat specified in rhe building line map shall be provided and maintained. The setback requirements shown on rhe adopted building line map for Chula Vista shall take precedence over the setbacks required in rhe zoning district. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ore!. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(F)). - - 19..34.070 Adcfitional conditions and requirements. The following additional conditions set fonh in Sections 19.34.080 through 19.34.210 shall apply in a CoN zone. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(parr)). 19..34.080 Enclosures required for all uses-Exceptions. Except as orherwise provided, all uses in a CoN zone shall be conducted wholly wirhin a completely enclosed building except for service stations, as stipulated in their conditional use permit, nurseries, and off-street parking and loading facilities and sidewalk cafes. (Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(1)). 19.34.090 Restrictions on sales of goods. In a CoN zone, goods for sale shall consist primarily of new merchandise and shan be sold at retail on the premises. (Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(G) (2)). 19.34.100 Site plan and architectUral approval required. Site plan and architectural approval are required for all uses in a CoN zone, as provided in Section 19.14.420 through 19.14.480. (Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.S08(G)(3)). - Cfe¡ 1189 (R 12/91) -~---- ---~ 19.34.110 Off-str.,.,r parldng and loading f.lc:iliries. Off·street loading and parking required for all uses in a C·N zone, as provided in Secrions 19.62.010 through 19.62.140. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(4)). 19.34.120 Empl~ ac:tÏvityrestrictiom.. The number of employees in any business establishment in a C·N zone shall be limited to those necessary for the conduct of the on·site business and no penon shall be engaged in the activity of processing,fabricating or repairing goods for delivery or sale at other locations. (Ord. 1212 §1 (Part), 1969; prior code §33.508(G) (5)). 19.34.130 Marlœt analysis required when.. A mmet analysis showing demand for new or addirional CoN facilities shall be submitted together with any application for rezoning of a new C·N district, or extension by one aCte or more of any existing CoN district. (Ord. 1212 §1 (Part), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(6)). 19.34.140 Curb CU!S and int-......~I traffic circuJation-ApprovaJ nquiml All curb cuts and internal traffic circulation for ingress and egress shall be approved by the planning commission subject to a recommendation from the city traffic engineer. (Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(7)). i .- 19.34.150 Shopping centers-Presentation as planned deftlopment required. Shopping centers proposed to be located in a C·N zone shall be presented as a planned development, each unit shall then proceed in accordance with the approved planned development. (Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(B)). 19.34.160 Design of buildings. All buildings in a C·N zone shall be designed so as to be compatible with surrounding neighborhood and the general character of the development shall continue and promote the established theme of the community. (Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(9)). 19.34.170 Hours for conducting business. No business shall be open in a C·N zone between the hours of eleven p.m. and seven a.m., unless specifically approved by the planning commission. (Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(G) (10)). 19.34.180 Evidence of certain compliance required annually. Each year, prior to issuing a business license or the renewal of a business license, establishments within the neighborhood shopping center shall present evidence of compliance with the requirements of this ~ I{)(J (R 12/91) 1190 - -- --~..._-'- ..--...-.-..-.- ntle, particularly h1 regard to the nature of the business as set forLh in Secnons 19.34.090 and 19.34.120 of this Òapter. (Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(11)). - 19-34.190 Trash storage are.3S. Trash storage areas in the CoN zone are subject to the conditions of Section 19.58.340. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1969; Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(12)). 19.34.200 Wall requirmlents. Zoning walls shall be pr~vided in the C·N zone subject to the conditions of Sections 19.58.150 and 19.58.360. (Ord. 1356 §1 (part), 1969; Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(13)). 19.34.210 Landscaping. The site shall be landscaped in confonnance with the landscape manual of the city, and approved by the director of planning. (Ord. 1356 §1 (part), 1969; Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.508(G)(14)). 19.34.220 Prohibited uses. , Uses expressly prohibited in a C·N zone include: A. Residential uses; - Any combination of residennal and nonresidential uses on a lot, parcel of land, or in any structure "- B. thereon; C. Industrial uses; D. Public address systems and/or loudspeakers outside of any building. (Ord. 1356 §1 (part), 1969; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(H)). 19-34.230 Emting nonconforming shopping centers-Conformance with rules and regulations required when-Time limit. All existing shopping centers which may, in the future, be classified in the neighborhood.commercial (C·N) zone shall, within the time established herein, be made to confonn to the requirements and regulations of the zone as applicable. The planning department shall submit a letter to the property owner and managers of the businesses being conducted within said shopping center, outlining the requirements and changes necessary to bring the center into confonnance with the zone requirements. All of said changes shall be accomplished within one year of the date of such notification. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(I)). - (O( 1191 (R 12/91) "" . ---------~--- 19.34.240 Performance standards. All uses in a CoN zone shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with the peñormance standards set forth in Chapter 19.66. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.508(J». .-/ (O-¿ ~ (R 12/91) 1192 "....-- ---~- _....~-,-_. ¡:ft (A-C!f-MËZ,(î 6 ChaptOT 19.30 -- C-O - ADMlNJSffiATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONE Sections: 19.30.010 ~ 19.30.020 Pe:n:nined uses. 19.30.030 Acc=ory uses and buildings. 19.30.040 Conditional uses. 19.30.050 Sign ~ons. 19.30.060 H~ regulations. 19.30.070 Area, lot width and yard requirement];. 19.30.080 Off-street parlång. 19.30.090 Parking and loading facilities. 19.30.100 Nonresidential uses in residential structures. 19.30.110 Site plan and arrhit-o>rtotr.d approval 19.30.120 Outdoor storage. 19.30.130 Trash storage areas. 19.30.140 wan requirements. 19.30.150 T.2nd~ing. 19.30.160 Performance standards. 19.30.010 Purpose. Tne purpose!)f the C·O zone is to provide appropriate Jocations where professional and administrative office zones may be established, maintained and protected. The regulations of this district are designed to - promote a quiet and dignified environment for business administration, professional and government activities, free from the congestion and traffic of the usual retail business district. To this end, the regularions permit office buildings and medical and financial facilities; appropriate commercial faciliries primarily for the service of the occupants of the district are permitted subject to special controls. The intensity of development of such a district is intended to reflect its environmental setting with building height and coverage generally similar to and harmonious with those of neighboring districts. (Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.506(A)). 19.30.020 P=nitted uses. Principal permitted uses in the C·O zone are as follows: A. Medical and denral offices and clinics, medical, oprical and denrallaboratories, not including the manufacture of pharmaceurical or other products for general sale or distribution; B. Administrative and executive offices; C. Professional offices, for lawyers, engineers, architects; D. Financial offices, including banks, and real estate and other general business offices; E. Any other office use which is determined by the commission to be of the same general character as the above permitted uses; - /f)3 1171 (R 11191) "---.- ____ ___" ____u_ F. AgricuJru.-aI uses as provided in Section 19.16.030; - G. Prescription pharmacies, see Definitions, Section 19.04.188. - COrd. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(B)). 19.30.030 kc=ory uses and buildings. Accessory uses in the C-O zone are as follows: A. Incidental sernces and incidental uses, such as restaurants, presaiption pharmacies, and retail sales to senre occupants and patrons of the permitted uses, when conducted and entered from within the building; provided there is no display or advertising visible from the public street. B. Accessory uses and buildings customarily appUrtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage facilities. (See Section 19.58.020.) C. A satellite dish antenna may be located in a commercial district when it complies with the provisions of standards 1 through 9 in Section 19.22.030F. In addition, non-conforming satellite dishes shall be amortized as per Section 19.22.030F.1l. (Ord. 2138 §1 (pan), 1986; Ord. 2108 §1 (pan), 1985; Ore!. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Orc!. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(C)). 19.30.040 C"nnrl;";ona1 uses. ~- - Conditional uses permitted in the C-O zone include: A. R·3 residential uses, as regulated therein; B. Public and quasi-public uses appropriate to the district, such as professional, business and technical schools of a public service type, but not including corporation yards, storage or repair yards and warehouses; C. Day nurseries, schools and studios for arts and crafts, photography, music, dance and an galleries, in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.58.220; D. Commercial parking lots and parking garages, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 19.62.010 through 19.62130; E. Radio and television broadcasting, excluding towers; F. Restaurants; G. Electric substations and gas regulators, subject to the ¡>rovisions of Section 19.58.140; H. Plant nurseries and the sale of related hardware items; provided, they are clearly incidental and secondazy to the plant nurset)'o Plant nurseries shall be allowed only on the peripheral areas of the COO zone, so as not to disrupt the continuity of the professional and administrative office land uses; I. Unclassified uses, see Chapter 19.54. -' ;oy (R 12191) 1172 J. Roof-mounted satenite dishes subject to the following standards or conditions: - 1. Th~ dishes shall be screened, using appropriate matching architectural materials or parapet walls. 2. Dish~ shall be of a neutral color, match me building or as otherwise approved by the City. 3. A building permit shall be required. 4. No advertising material shall be allowed on the satellite dish antenna. Satellite dish antenna conWning advertising material shall be considered a sign. K. Recycling collection centers, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.340. (Ord. 2252 §4, 1988; Ord. 2233 §4, 1987; Ord. 2108 §1 (Part), 1985; Ord. 1889 §1, 1980; Ord. 1494 §5, 1973; Ord. 1356 §1 (part), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.506(D)). 19.30.050 Sign regulations. See Sections 19.60.020 and 19.60.030 for permit requirement and approval procedure. A Types of signs allowed: Business (wall and/or marquee and either a freestanding or projecting sign) subject to the following: 1. Wall and/or marquee: Each busiItess shall be allowed a combined sign area of twenty square feet ~, for each portion of the building facing a dedicated street or alley. Businesses facing a major or ! . - coll~r street shall be allowed an additional one square foot for each two feet of lineal building '- frontage over twenty feet facing said street, but shall not exceed a total of fifty square feel. Each business shall also be allowed signs facing on-site parking areas for five or more cars and wall:ways, a minimum of ten feet in width. The signs shall be allowed one-half square foot per lineal foot of building facing said area; maximum area, twenty square feet per business; 2. Freemnding (pole): Each lot shall be allowed a freestanding sign with a maximum sign area of three square 'feet; however, if more than one business is located on the lot or is located in a building d~igned for occupancy by more than one business, the area of the sign may be increased an additional three square feet for each business displayed on the sign to a maximum . area of twelve square feet and four tenant business signs. The sign shall not exceed eight feet in heighL A business or business complex located on a major or collector street shall be allowed a freestanding poJe sign subject to the following: a. Maximum height, sixteen feet, b. Maximum sign area, thirty-two square feet, e. Minimum ground clearance, eight feet, d. The sign shall not be permitted to project into the public right of way, e. The sign shall maintain a ten-foot setback from all interior property lines, f. OnJy one business or the name of the commercial complex may be displayed on the sign; '- .---- ¡OS 1173 (R 12/91) -~.-----_._-_.--." -- ._-~--- -..------. 3. Ground (monument): A low-prome ground sign may be used in place of a freestanding pole si&n- Tne sign shall be subject to the following: - a. Maximum height, four feet- Businesses located on major or collector streets, six feet, b. Maximum sign area, twelve square feet. Businesses located on major or collector streets, twenty-five square feet, <- The sign shall maintain a five-foot setback from all streets and ten feet from all interior property lines, d. The sign structure shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the main building and constructed with the same or similar materials; 4. Projecting: A projecting sign may be used in lieu of a freestanding (pole or ground) sign subject to the following: a. The maximum projection from the face of the building shall be based on the clearance of the sign from the bonom of the sign to the ground as shown in the following table: Maximum Diagonal Ground. Maximum Projection Oeanmce Projection (comer lot) 8' or less 1'0" 1'0· 9' 1'6" 1'8" 10' 2'0' 2'4' _. 11' 2'6" 3'0· 3'8' . -..,/ 12' 3'0' 13' 3'6' 4'4" 14' 4'0' 5'0· . b. Projecting signs less than eight feet from the ground shall not project closer than three feet to any area used for vehiclÙar circlÙation and six inches to any area used for pedestrian circlÙation, c. The sign shall not project above the roof, parapet or first story, d. The maximum sign area for double-faced signs shall be twelve square feet and twenty-four square feet for spheres, cylinders, and mlÙti-sided signs not including the top and bonom of the sign when no copy is applied to those surfaces. B. Other signs: See Chapter 19.60 for the following signs: Window (Section 19.60.270); canopy (Section 19.60.280); temporary construction (Section 19.60.290); temporary promotional '(Section 19.60.300); public and quasi-public (Section 19.60.310); sign boards and buildings (Section 19.60.330); directional (Section 19.60.340); warning and instructional (Section 19.60.350); directory (Section 19.60.370); real estate (Section 19.60.380); unclassißed uses (Section 19.60.400); signs on mansard roofs (Section 19.60.410); sign on pitched roofs (Section 19.60.420); business (Section 19.60.430); signs on architectural appendages (Section 19.60.440); 1. Signs on screening walls or fences: Signs denoting oIÙY the names of the occupants, principal business, or name of the commercial complex may be applied to a wall or fence used as screening of parking areas in lieu of a freestanding or projecting sign. Maximum sign area shall be three '--' 16b (R 12/91) 1174 ._n square feet, except a business or complex located 0;> a major or collector street shall be allowed an area of twenty·five square feet. - c. O1her regulations: All signs are subject to the regulations of Sections 19.60.040 through 19.60.130 2.."1d the standards of Sections 19.60.140 through 19.60.210. D. Nonconforming signs: See Sections 19.60.090 through 19.60.120. E. Tne design review comminee may reduce sign areas beJaw those authorized above based on the sign guidelines and criteria contained in the design manual. (Ord. 2309A §5, 1989; Ord. 1575 §1 (pan), 1974; Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(E)). 19.30.060 HejghI: regulations. No principal building shall exceed three and one-half stories or fony-five feet in height, and no accessory building shall exceed one and one·half stories or fifteen feet in height, except as provided in Section 19.16.040. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(F)). 19.30.070 Area, lot width and yard requiremenB.. The following minimum area, lot width and yard requirements shall be observed in the CoO zone, except as provided in Sections 19.16.020 and 19.16.060 through 19.16.080, and where increased for conditional uses: '-' Setbacks in Feet Lot Are:t* Front &: E:á. (Sq. Pt.) Side Yards Side Rear 7,000 10 None, except when abutting Zero feet, except when any R zone, then not less abutting any R dist- than five feet rict or alley, then not less than ten feet minimum from the alley or rear property line *See Section 19.16.070 for lot area. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(G)). 19.30.080 Off-street parking. Off-street parking is required for all uses.in the CoO zone, as provided in Sections 19.62.010 through 19.62.130. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (part), 1969; prior code §33.506(H)(1)). ~ 107 1175 (R 12/91) ---..--.--- - ----------~-- - _.~ 19.30.090 Parldng and lo.acting facilities. - In any CoO disnict directly across a stIeet or thoroughfare (excluding a freeway) from any R disnict, parJdng and loacting facilities shall be distant at le....t ten feet from said stIeet and said setback shall be permanently landscaped. (Ord. 1356 § 1 (pan), 1971; Ord.1212 § 1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(H) (2)). 19.30.100 Nomesidential uses in residential structures. Nonresidential uses permitted in this zone shall be Jocated in buildings designed for nonresidential uses, except that such uses may be located in existing residential structures existing at the rime of the adoption of the ordinance codified in this title, remodeled for said use and subject to site plan approval by the planning commission. Such buildings may be enlarged, providing that all provisions of this title are complied with. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (Pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(H)C3)). 19.30.110 Siœ pIan and arr-hit.......,r.ù approval. Site plan and architectural approvaJ are required for all uses in the C-O zone, as required in Sections 19.14.420 through 19.20.480. (Ord. 1356 §1 (Pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(H)(4)). 19.30.120 Outdoor storage. Outdoor storage of merchandise, material or equipment shall be permitted in the CoO zone only when incidental to permitted or accessory use located on the same premises, and provided that: .-", A. Storage area shall be completely enclosed by walls, fences or buildings and shall be pan of an approved site plan; B. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment to a height greater than that of any enclosing wall, fence or building shall be permitted. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (Pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(H) (5)). 19.30.130 Trash storage areas. Trash storage areas in the CoO zone are subject to the conditions of Section 19.58.340. COrd. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (Pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(H)(6)). 19.30.14a Wall ~enlS. Zoning walls shall be provided, subject to the conditions of Section 19.58.360. COrd. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(H)(7)). 19.30.150 Landscaping. All landscaping in the CoO zone shall conform to the requirements as specified in the landscape manual and approved by the director of planning. Any parking visible from the street shall be screened with ~ (OJ" (R 12/91) 1176 - ----....---.-----.--....,....-."..--- an appropr'.ate screen not less than four feet in height or a masonry wall of three and one·half fee! in height. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pa..-r) , 1969; prior code §33.506rrl)(B)). - 19.30.160 Performance standards. All uses in the CoO zone shall be subject to initial and continued compliance wirh rhe performance standards set forth in Chapter 19.66. (Ord. 1356 §1 (pan), 1971; Ord. 1212 §1 (pan), 1969; prior code §33.506(H) (B)). - i - - - 16 '7 1177 (R 12191) -- - ~._._- --.--...-.------ ------.- -- ..----------,-,-----,--,.- - --- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /..2. Meeting Date 2/17/98 J~J ;¿ ITEM TITLE: Resolution ¿¡Accepting contract work for the "Installation of Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk hnprovements along the East Side of Fourth Avenue Between Chula Vista Adult School and Orange A venue in the City of Chula Vista, California, (STM-302)" project; Approving Change Order No.1 and authorizing the Director of Public Works to execute it on behalf of the City; and transferring Transportation Partnership Funds from Account No. 253- mQ-STL233 '0 A= NOp"HTM3fY2 SUBMITTED BY: Director of Publ~c Work~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager0~~ (4/Sths Vote: Yesà No_) {..J On July 23, 1996, the City Council by Resolution No. 18376 awarded a contract in the amount of $227,950.70 to Builders Staff Corporation, for the Instanation of Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements along the East Side of Fourth Avenue Between Chula Vista Adult School and Orange Avenue (STM-302). Builders Staff Corporation had almost completed the project when the City stopped making payments due to stop notices and a lawsuit. The company was forced into bankruptcy, leaving some of the work incomplete. The bonding company for Builders Staff Corporation, Redlands Insurance Company, completed the project on June 2, 1997. The law suit has been settled and the Redlands Insurance Company has submitted an invoice which will finalize the project. This invoice includes the 10% Retention of previous payments to Builders Staff Corporation as wen as several changes, mostly minor, that were made during construction. Change Order No.1 for extra work items, as wen as unit changes in contract items that have been adjusted or deJeted, also need to be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approves the Resolution accepting the contract work; approving change order No.1, increasing the contract by $17,954.47 and authorizing the Director of Public Works to execute it on behalf of the City; and transferring $18,537.55 in Transportation Partnership Funds from Account No. 253-2530-STL233 to Account No. 253-2530-STM302. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Builders Staff Corporation, the contractor for this project, declared bankruptcy just prior to completing all contract work requiring their bonding company, Redlands Insurance Company, to complete the project. The work was completed within the contract time. However, to enforce their stop notice, McCain Traffic Supply fùed suit, naming several parties including Builders Staff Corporation and the City of Chula Vista. Several cross-complaints were also filed. On December I, 1997, the case was settled and dismissed. An parties agreed that an moneys held by the City for work done on the project should be paid to Redlands Insurance Company since they had /~ -- / ~ ~-,-...__..._-_._-_._.._-,_. --.-----. Page 2, Item Meeting Date 2/17/98 completed the project and took care of the stop notices filed by subcontractors and/or material providers. The RedJands Insurance Company has since submitted an invoice to finalize the project. This invoice includes, the 10% Retention of previous payments to Builders Staff Corporation as well as for the work changes that were made during construction. The change order consists of the miscellaneous changes in quantities, which is a normal part of all construction contracts, and other additional or deleted work items needed to restore properties to their owner's satisfaction and/or to accommodate changed field conditions. The items in the change order incJude: extension of retaining walls, modifications of driveways, additional fencing, additional water and sewer services. Many of these changes were to account for the addition of the sole property owner that had refused to participate in the project before the contract was awarded. Once the work began, this owner changed his position and dedicated the right-of-way adjacent to his property. Inclusion of this owner allowed us to install the sidewalk improvements throughout the project limits, thus, completing the improvements on the East side of Fourth A venue between Moss Street and Main Street. SUMMARY OF CHANGES - (Change Order No.1) Original Contract amount $227,950.70 Change Order Adjustments to contract unit prices: Contract Items adjustments +$ 6,914.06 Contract Items deleted - $16 765.08 Subtotal - $ 9,851.02 Extra Work +$ 27.805.49 Change Order Total +$ 17.954.47 Revised Contract Amount +$245,905.17 Less Payments made to Builders Staff Corporation - $192.465.83 Remaining Balance to be Paid to Redlands Ins. Co. $ 53,439.34 It should also be noted that the inspection staff cost ($49,863.28) was considerably larger than it was originally estimated ($19,500.00). The principal reason for this increase was that the property restoration associated with the conditions imposed by the property owners in exchange for their dedication of the rights-of-way required the inspector to dedicate more attention to assure property owner satisfaction. In addition the stop notices, associated lawsuit and contractor's bankruptcy required additional staff time to administer the project. /02 -;2 Page 3, Item Meeting Date 2/17/98 FISCAL IMPACT: I. Appropriated Funds (Construction phase only) a. Transportation Partnership Funds $317,729.55 b. Transnet Funds $ 2.582.00 Total I $320,311.55 II. Contract Amount as Awarded on Council Agenda Statement a. A ward Amount $227,950.70 b. Contingencies $ 22.630.85 Subtotal $250,581.55 c. Sweetwater Authority Modifications (City's Cost) $ 19,250.00 d. SDG&E Modifications (City's Cost) $ 30,980.00 e. Staff Time $ 19.500.00 Tota111 $320,311.55 III. Actual Expenditures Construction: a. Contract as completed, including change order $245,905.17 c. Sweetwater Authority Modifications (City's Cost) $ 19,250.00 d. SDG&E Modifications (City's Cost) $ 23.830.65 Construction Cost Subtotal $288,985.82 e. Staff costs during Construction $ 49.863.28 Tota11I1 $338.849.10 This change order will increase the original contract amount by $17,954.47, bringing the final construction contract to $245,905.17. The remaining funds in the account are sufficient to make the fmal payment to Redlands Insurance Company. However, additional funds in the amount of $18,537.55 need to be transferred from Account No. 253-2530-STL233 (FY97/98 Pavement Rehabilitation Program) to Project Account No. 253-2530-STM302 to cover staff time costs. The FY97/98 Pavement Rehabilitation Program will have to be scaled back, however, staff is proposing to increase next year's Pavement Rehabilitation Program CIP by a like amount in order to not impact the overall program. Enclosure: Change Order No. I NOT SCANNED H:\HOMElENGINEERIAGENDA ISTM302.MJI /2-3 -- --..-- - ._._-_.,._---,_._--._.~-_..- '~9 RESOLUTION NO. / ¿7;2- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING CONTRACT WORK FOR THE "INSTALLATION OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF FOURTH AVENUE BETWEEN CHULA VISTA ADULT SCHOOL AND ORANGE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, (STM-302)" PROJECT; APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND TRANSFERRING TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT NO. 253-2530-STL233 TO ACCOUNT NO. 253-2530- STM302 WHEREAS, on July 23, 1996, the City Council by Resolution No. 18376 awarded a contract in the amount of $227,950.70 to Builders Staff Corporation, for the Installation of curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements along the East Side of Fourth Avenue Between Chula vista Adult School and Orange Avenue (STM-302); and WHEREAS, Builders Staff Corporation had almost completed the proj ect when the City stopped making payments due to stop notices and a lawsuit and the company was forced into bankruptcy, leaving some of the work incomplete; and WHEREAS, the bonding company for Builders Staff Corporation, Redlands Insurance Company, completed the project on June 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, the lawsuit has been settled and the Redlands Insurance Company has submitted an invoice which will finalize the project, which invoice includes the 10% Retention of previous payments to Builders Staff Corporation as well as several changes, mostly minor, that were made during construction; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 for extra work items, as well as unit changes in contract items that have been adjusted or deleted, also need to be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby accept contract work for the "Installation of Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements along the East Side of Fourth Avenue between Chula vista Adult School and Orange Avenue in the City of Chula vista, California, (STM-302)" project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Change No. 1 increasing the contract by $17,954.17 is hereby approved and the Director of 1 J.2 -1- , ... -,_._.__.~--~-.-. Public Works is authorized to execute it on behalf of the city of Chula vista. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $18,537.55 in Transportation Partnership Funds is hereby transferred from Account No. 253-2530- STL233 to Account No. 253-2530-STM302. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt, Director of ey Public Works C:\rs\st.302 2 /.2---5 ._-_._~- --~-- CHANGE IN CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DATE: JANUARY 5,1998 FILE NO. 0735-10-STM302 CONTRACT: INSTALLATION OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF FOURTH AVE. BETWEEN C.V. ADULT SCHOOL AND ORANGE AVE. (STM-302) CONTRACTOR: BUILDERS STAFF CORPORATION The following changes shall be made to increase the contract dated July 23, 1997 between the City of Chula Vista and Builders Staff Corporation. REMARKS AND DETAILS: This change in the plans is requested by the City of Chula Vista to complete improvements per plan and to reflect changes made due to conditions encountered in the field. The changes include: I ADJUST BID ITEMS SHOW ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS II INCREASE WORK TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGED CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD IA ADJUST BID ITEMS OF WORK Item Change In Unit Change No. Items per Bid Proposal Quantity Cost In Cost 3 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 133.3 TN @ $43.08 $5,742.56 6 4" PCC Sidewalk and Slabwork 763.4 SF @ $2.03 $1,549.70 8 Keystone Retaining Wall 250 SF @ $8.98 $2,245.00 12 Installation of New Mailboxes 7 EA @ $89.75 $628.25 22 Furnish/Install #5 Pull Box wlTraffic Signal Lid 2 EA @ $179.51 $359.02 27 Furnish/Install ADA Pedestrian Push Buttons 2 EA @ $119.67 $239.34 28 Trench, Furnish/Install Approx. 600 LF Conduit 70 LF @ $11.97 $837.90 32 Install Type D Detector Loops 1 EA @ $478.68 $478.68 4 Crushed Aggregate Base -205.66 TN @ $17.95 -$3,691.60 5 6" PCC Type G Curb/Gutter SDRSD G-2 -145.5 LF @ $5.38 -$782.79 7 6" PCC Driveway approach CVCS-1 -297 SF @ $2.33 -$692.01 TOTAL OF ADJUSTED ITEMS $6,914.06 /)-!- _.... _.__w..._. . __ ..__ __..m_ .__..____~__ _ CHANGE IN CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 JANUARY 5, 1998, 1997 FILE NO. 0735-10-STM302 PAGE NO.2 IB DELETE BID ITEMS OF WORK Item Change In Unit Change No. Item per Bid Proposal Quantity Cost In Cost 9 4' Chain Link Fence -300 LF @ $13.16 -$3,948.00 40 Tree Planting -21 EA @ $418.85 -$8,795.85 42 TransNet Signs -2 EA @ $538.52 -$1,077.04 43 Sandblasting -1LS @ $1,795.07 -$1,795.07 44 Asphalt Concrete Dike SDRSD G-5 -96 LF @ $11.97 -$1,149.12 -$16,765.08 TOTAL CHANGES IN BID ITEMS OF WORK -$9,851.02 II ADD EXTRA WORK ITEMS Item Unit Change No. Extra Work Items Quantity Cost In Cost A Work on Sewer Laterals 1LS @ $3,545.19 $3,545.19 B Remove Tree Stump 1LS @ $610.42 $610.42 C Modify Driveways and Transitions 1 LS @ $5,752.69 $5,752.69 D Additional Block Walls 1 LS @ $8,818.16 $8,818.16 E Additional Gates/Fencing 1 LS @ $1,437.98 $1,437.98 F Additional Water Service 1 LS @ $557.75 $557.75 G Extra Storm Drain Work 1 LS @ $610.33 $610.33 H Install Conduit for Advance Loop 1 LS @ $863.98 $863.98 I Work at 1179 Fourth Avenue 1 LS @ $5,608.99 $5,608.99 TOTAL ADDITIONAL ITEMS $27,805.49 ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE: $ 227,950.70 TOTAL OF ADJUSTED BID ITEMS: $ - 9,851.02 TOTAL OF ADDITIONAL WORK ITEMS: $ 27 .805.49 REVISED TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE: $ 245,905.17 /;2-? CHANGE IN CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 JANUARY 5,1998,1997 FILE NO. 0735-10-STM302 PAGE No.3 It is agreed by the undersigned that all extra work shall be performed and materials furnished according to the original contract and according to the statement, if any, attached hereto. The contract time shall be extended by three (3) working days. t APPROVED BY ACCEPTED BY ORDERED BY John Goss dlands Insurance Company lifford L. Swanson City Manager 7 3 Clairborne Court Deputy Director of Shawnee, KS 66217 Public Works/City Engineer (H,\. .\Inspection\Chg_ Odr\STM302-1.CCO: MJI) );2---Y _~______m. ___ ~__...~__ .__._ .._,~_.._,.._,.._.______~_...__ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item / J Meeting Date Februarv 17. 1998 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: PCM 98-02 - Proposal to amend the Otay Ranch SPA One Planned Community District Regulations Part III, Section II, Table III- 3 to alJow market flexibility in determining the provision of HolJywood Driveways. ORDINANCE NO. ;< ?..<.;L..An Ordinance of the City Council of the City ofChula Vista approving an amendment to the Otay Ranch Sectional PJanning Area (SPA) One Planned Community District Regulations. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning .$( REVIEWED BY: City ManagerCeìt: & (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX) ~cJ JD The Otay Ranch Company has submitted an application to amend the SPA One Planned Community District Regulations to allow market flexibility in determining the provision of HolJywood Driveways. This request is consistent with the amendment approved for the McMiJlin Companies portion ofthe SPA One which was granted by the City Council on June 3, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve Ordinance _ approving an amendment to the Otay Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) One Planned Community District Regulations. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: . The Planning Commission considered the amendment to the Otay Ranch SPA One Planned Community District ReguJations on January 14, 1998. The Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution PCM 98-02, by a unanimous vote (6-0-1, O'Neill absent), recommending that the City Council approve the Planned Community District Regulations amendment with the folJowing two modifications: 1) That the language be changed to reflect that there will be a model home with a HolJywood Driveway, instead of a model with the option of having a HolJywood Driveway; and, 2) That staff work with the appJicant in an attempt to devise a more formal means of evaluating and assessing public reaction to the HolJywood Driveway. The recommended amendment to the Planned Community District Regulations reads as folJows: "Garages for housing located on lots at Jeast 60 feet wide by 110 feet deep (pads) shall be set back a minimum of30 feet and incorporate a "HolJywood" Driveway (see /c~-/ Page 2, Item: _ Meeting Date: 2/17/98 Village Design PJan) as follows: The model homes shall include at Jeast one modeJ sited and constructed with the Hollywood Driveway concept and the minimum percentage to be constructed shall be detennined by market conditions. City staff and the appJicant shall work together to devise a more formal means of evaluating and assessing public reaction to the Hollywood Driveway." BACKGROUND: I. GDP/SP A Approval/Current PJanned Community District RellUlations (PC Rel!s) The Otay Ranch General Development Plan/Subregional Plan (GDP/SRP) was approved jointly by the City and County in October 1993. The GDP/SRP describes the Village Concept which encourages "villages designed for people, with inviting pedestrian-accessibJe pubJic spaces" (page 7). The GDP also states that "Jand uses, roads and buildings shall be designed and Jocated to encourage walking between uses and foster a pedestrian scale" (page 95). The Otay Ranch SPA One Plan was approved by the Chula Vista City Council on June 4, 1996 and implements the goals and principles set forth in the GDP/SRP by encouraging pedestrian friendJy designs such as: · Alley product types with vehicuJar access from the rear of the lot off an alley which serves to minimize vehicular intrusion onto residential streets · Landscaped parkways on the majority oflocal residential streets with a 6-foot parkway and a 4-foot sidewalk · Paseos which provide separate pedestrian bicycle and cart access · Hollywood Driveways which limit the width of driveways at the street rrontage, provide a landscaped strip between two ribbons of concrete and place the garage behind the house. The requirement for Hollywood Driveways in the PC District Regulations for Otay Ranch SPA One is contained in a footnote to the setback requirements and originally read as follows: "A minimum of30% of the garages on housing located on lots at least 55 feet wide and 105 feet deep shall be set back a minimum of 30 feet and incorporate a "Hollywood" driveway." 2. Previous Amendment to PC District Regulations During the processing ofPCS 97-02, the McMillin Companies Tentative Map for Otay Ranch, they expressed concern regarding the marketability of the Hollywood Driveway concept. On June 3, 1997 the City Council approved the map along with the following changes to the PC ReguJations, as noted in bold: A minimum of30% ofthe garages on housing located on lots at least 60 feet wide by 110 feet deep (pads) shall be set back a minimum of30 feet and incorporate a "Hollywood" Driveway (see Village /J/;¿ ....._~~_._..-....- Page 3, Item: _ Meeting Date: 2/17/98 Design Plan). However, for Neighborhood R-ll the model homes shall include at least one model with the option of being sited and constructed with the "Hollywood" Driveway concept and the minimum percentage to be constructed in Neighborhood R-ll shall be determined by market conditions. Essentially, this amendment exempted Neighborhood R-24 ITom the requirement. Neighborhood R- 24 is comprised of 138 5,000 square foot Jots, which are approximately 50 feet by 100 feet deep. Of the 138 Jots in Neighborhood R-24, only 36 of these qualified as being 55 feet wide, therefore, producing only II "Hollywood" Driveways in the entire 138 lot subdivision. Staff did not believe this was significant and found it acceptable to exempt Neighborhood R-24 ITom the requirement. The amendment also allowed for the provision of a Hollywood Driveway on only one of the four models in Neighborhood R-II. Neighborhood R-II was approved with 125 lots with 60 feet by 110 deep pads. This results in a requirement of31 Hollywood Driveways in Neighborhood R-II. Additionally, the potential exists that Hollywood Driveways will not be constructed at all if the deveJoper detennines the concept is not marketable. 3. Village Development Original Reqpest At the June 17, 1997 City Council hearing, the above noted ordinance amendments to the PC District ReguJations were introduced. At that meeting, representatives of Otay Ranch Company (then known as Village Development) requested that the same market flexibility appJy to their portion of SPA One and include their portion of the tentative map. Mr. Aden stated that the flexibility should apply to alJ developers within the same project. The City Manager recommended that the ordinance not be amended for Village Development without analysis by staff. The City Attorney also indicated that there was no evidence presented during the Council pubJic hearing for SPA-wide implementation of the market flexibility provisions. The Council determined that the amendment should only apply to McMillin's property since it is pursuant to their application for an amendment to the SPA One PJan. At the meeting, the City Council requested that staff return with a report addressing the lot width criteria for the Hollywood Driveways in relation to the 50-foot wide Jots within the older existing neighborhoods in Chula Vista. This report was presented to the City Council on July 22, 1997 and is attached as Exhibit 7. The Council accepted the report on that date. The report concludes that utilizing a 50-foot wide lot to achieve the Hollywood Driveway would necessitate the creation of a lot deeper than 110 feet. DISCUSSION: 1. Proposal The applicant, Otay Ranch Company, is requesting the same market flexibility in relation to the provision of Hollywood Driveways that was applied to the McMillin project. The applicant's proposal essentially would apply the same standard that had been previously appJied to McMillin's project on a SPA-wide basis. Specifically, the applicant is requesting the following amendment: /3'3 Page 4, Item: _ Meeting Date: 2/17/98 ;;ii¡~¡¡¡!î!#nl:~I~11\ i¡~g~~ Garages for II housing located on lots at Jeast 60 feet wide by 110 feet deep (pads) shall be set backaII1il1ÎInull1()f3gfeetandincorporatea "IIollywood" Driveway (see Village Design Plan) as foDows: ~1;~¡~~~¡;~î~~~l~J;~¡!lÞªlff!l!íê :rr¡~ model homes shall include at least one model with the option of being sited and constructed with the "Hollywood" Driveway concept and the minimum percentage to be constructedm~{4¡~~¡.j.¡!I~îî shall be determined by market conditions." 2. Analvsis The original requirement in the PC District Regulations (30% of all 55 x lOS-foot Jots and above) would have applied to the following neighborhoods within Otay Ranch Company's portion of SPA One: VILLAGE ONE Neighborhood Lot Size # of Lots 30% of Total R-4 55 x 105' 94 28 R-7 60 x 110' 133 40 R-10 55 x 105' 116 35 SUBTOTAL: 343 103 VILLAGE FIVE Neighborhood Lot Size # of Lots 30% of Total R-25 60 x 11 0' 63 19 R-26 55 x 105' 70 21 R-33 55 x 105' 47 14 R-34 55 x 105' 35 10 R-35 60 x 110' 36 11 SUBTOTAL: 251 75 TOTAL: 594 178 The original SPA One Plan requirements would have required a minimum of 178 Hollywood Driveways throughout Otay Ranch Company's Tentative Map. The first amendment to the Hollywood Driveway requirement increased the lot size requirement to 60 x 110 feet, essentially eliminating all 55 x lOS-foot lots from the requirement to provide / J' v¡ - - --,._.._-----~._- ~._"_.,-,_._-_.- Page 5, Item: _ Meeting Date: 2/17/98 Hollywood Driveways. This amendment, although proposed by McMillin Companies, was applied on a SPA-wide basis and altered the original provision as it applies to the Otay Ranch Company as follows: VILLAGE ONE Neighborhood Lot Size # of Lots 30% of Total R-7 60x 110' 133 40 SUBTOTAL: 133 40 VILLAGE FIVE Neighborhood Lot Size # of Lots 30% of Total R-25 60 x 110' 63 19 R-35 60x 110' 36 11 SUBTOTAL: 99 30 TOTAL: 232 70 Currently, as can be seen from the tables above, the Otay Ranch Company would be obJigated to provide 70 Hollywood Driveways on their portion of SPA One. The applicant's current proposal would reduce the required number of Hollywood Driveways within the Otay Ranch Company portion of the SPA to 58 lots (if all models were plotted equally) as indicated below: VILLAGE ONE Neighborhood Lot Size # of Lots 25% of Total R-7 60 x 110' 133 33 SUBTOTAL 133 33 VILLAGE FIVE Neighborhood Lot Size # of Lots 25% of Total R-25 60x 110' 63 16 R-35 60x 110' 36 9 SUBTOTAL 99 25 TOTAL 232 58 ..--, c:- / ,~ --> ../ -...~._--"_._-- Page 6, Item: _ Meeting Date:2/17/98 It should also be noted that as with the McMillin amendment, if the developer determines that Hollywood Driveways are not marketable, it is possible that none will be provided. However, since the Planning Commission added a requirement that staff and the applicant must develop a more formal means of evaluating the Hollywood Driveways success, staff could potentially have more input into the final determination. 3. Conclusion While staff voiced their concern to the Planning Commission that the neo-traditional concepts of the GDP and SPA One Plan appear to becoming diluted before they have an opportunity to be tested, the Planning Commission believed that there was a strong equity and fairness argument. It is staffs opinion that the recommendation forwarded to the Planning Commission is the desirable standard, however, staff is in agreement with the Planning Commission that the same standards should be used on a project wide basis to ensure consistency and equity. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact to the General Fund since the Otay Ranch Company application has been processed under the current staffing agreement. Attachments I' City Council Ordinance 2. Locator Map. 3. Planning C0111111ission Minutes from January 14, 1998 meeting . 4. Planning Commission Resolution of Approval, PCM 98-02 5. Minutes of June 3,1997 City Council meeting fi 6. Minutes of June 17, 1997 City Council meeting f-.I 7. Minutes of July 22, 1997 City Council meeting o 8. July 22, 1997 City Councillnfonnational Report 2: 9. Map of SPA One Neighborhoods 10. Letters from Otay Ranch Company 11. Disclosure Statement J~s- t --,._~--_..__. ORDINANCE NO. 27;22- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY RANCH SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) ONE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS WHEREAS, an appJication for an amendment to the Otay Ranch Sectional PJanning Area (SP A) One Plan, was filed with the City of ChuJa Vista Planning department on July 15, 1997 ("Project") by the Otay Ranch Company ("Applicant"); and WHEREAS, these Planned Community District Regulations are estabJished pursuant to Title 19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, specifically Chapter 19.48 PC Planned Community Zone, and are applicable to the Otay Ranch SPA One Land Use Plan ofthe SPA PJan, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for hearings on said Project and notice of said hearings, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circuJation in the City and its mailing to Property Owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised on January 14, 1998 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, a Second-tier Environmental Impact Report (EIR) EIR 95-01, a Recirculated Second-tier Draft EIR and Addendum, and Findings of Fact and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been issued to address environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the SPA One Plan and the Project Documents; and WHEREAS, the Second-tier EIR 95-01, the Recirculated EIR and Addendum incorporates, by reference, two prior EIRs: the Otay Ranch General Development Plan/Subregional Plan (GDP/SRP) EIR 90-01 and the Chula Vista Sphere ofInfluence Update EIR 94-03 as well as their associated Findings of Fact and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Program EIR 90-01 was certified by the Chula Vista City Council and San Diego County Board of Supervisors on October 28, 1993, and the Sphere ofInfluence Update EIR 94-03 was certified by the Chula Vista City Council on March 21, 1995; and WHEREAS, the City Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Project and determined that the Project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061 (b) (3) "General Rule" that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and it can be seen with certainty that the proposed project has no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment and therefore is not subject to CEQA; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista held a duJy noticed public hearing on February 17, 1998 regarding the Project. /3-7 --.-.~-~_._..__._--_.__.- ..__.~.__..- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista does hereby ordain as follows: I. ACTION The City Council hereby approves the amendment to the ordinance (footnote to setback requirements) adopting the Planned Community District Regulations for the Otay Ranch SPA One Plan finding that they are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice supports their approval and implementation as follows: "Garages for housing located on lots at least 60 feet wide by 11 0 feet deep (pads) shall be set back a minimnm of 30 feet and incorporate a Hollywood Driveway (see Village Design Plan) as follows: The model homes shall include at least one model being sited and constructed with the Hollywood Driveway concept and the minimum percentage to be constructed shall be determined by market conditions. City staff and the applicant shall work together to devise a more formal means of evaluating and assessing public reaction to the Hollywood Driveway." II. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA That the City council does hereby find that FEIR 95-01 and Addendum, the Findings of Fact, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and the Statement of Overriding Considerations are prepared in accordance with the requirements ofthe CEQA, the State EIR guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista. III. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force the thirtieth day from its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by Robert A. Leiter (Á/'-- YVL19<~ l~ John M. Kaheny, City Attorney Planning Director /. H:\HOMEIBEVERL YB\VILLAGE\SP Al IFINAl,MP\CC 114.0RD /3--V _________...__.._ ___ ~_m_'_'..___..___"' ___.._.___.___._ ~~-{ . I en ;;c .... \ ,~ LEGEND \ _ AREA OF AMENDMENT \ \ . / CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR PROJECT The OIay Ranch, L.P. PROJECT DESCRlPTJDN: C) APPLICA/IT. AMENDMENT :g-'~: So. 01 T.C.R. between Request Amendment to PC (Planned Community) District PaseD Ranchero & SR125 Regulations for Hollywood Driveways. SCALE: FILE NUMBER: .- NORTH No Scale PCM-9B-02-..5 h:\home\planning\car1os~ocators\pcm9802.cdr 7/31/97 ____. _ _ ___ THIS PAGE BLANK Y ---------~..,--_.._---_._._--_.._....._-_.....-.-.._---...-..._-.~--..----.-.-.----.-.---.--_._'..'-_...._.-.----,_.._._---~----"'---- Planning Commission Minutes - 3 - January 14, 1998 . 2. PUBLIC HEARING: PCM 98-02 Proposal to amend the Otay Ranch SPA One Planned Community District Regulations Part III, Section II, Table 11I-3 to allow market flexibility in determining the provision of Hollywood Driveways. Background: Beverly Blessent, Associate Planner, reported that the Otay Ranch SPA One Plan was approved by the City Council on June 4,1996 and contains implementation measures intended toward encouraging pedestrian-friendly designs and attractive streetscapes, they are: alley product types, landscaped parkways, and Hollywood Driveways, which is the subject of the applicant's request. Hollywood Driveways are typically defined by several characteristics; the main one being that the garage is set behind the main house. The current Planned Community district regulations indicate that it would be a minimum of 30 feet from the curb. Additionally, the width of the driveway would be limited at the curb at the street right-of-way and also provide a landscape strip between two ribbons of concrete that would lead back to the driveway. Again, the intent is to create a more aesthetic streetscape and to avoid garages that would dominate the street scene. The applicant, Otay Ranch Company, is requesting an amendment to the PC regulations of the SPA I that would be consistent with the amendment that was granted to McMillin Company in June of 1997. The applicant is requesting the same market flexibility in relation to the provision of Hollywood Driveways that was applied to the McMillin project; that being that the Hollywood Driveways be required on lots of 60 X 110 feet rather than 55 X 105 feet; that the requirement that the Hollywood Driveway be constructed on 30% of these lots be deleted, and to require one model be planned with a Hollywood Driveway and allowing the market to dictate whether or not the model with the Hollywood Driveway is actually constructed. Ms. Blessent stated that while staff is cognizant of the equity issue between McMillin Companies and the Otay Ranch Company, there is strong concern that the neo-traditional concepts of the SPA One Plan are being diluted before they have the opportunity to be tested, and staff is also concerned with the developer's sole discretion to determine the success of the Hollywood Driveway's marketability. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 98-02 recommending that the City Council deny the applicant's request to amend the Hollywood driveway requirement. Public Hearing Opened 7:35 Kent Aden, 11975 EI Camino Real, #104, San Diego, CA, representing Otay Ranch Company, stated that he drafted the Planned Community Regulations for Otay Ranch and is an ardent supporter of Hollywood Driveways as well as the other neo-traditional concepts contained in the PC Regulations, and Otay Ranch Company is strongly committed to promoting the pedestrian-friendly neighborhood. The proposal is to change the present PC District Regulations which require a minimum of 30% of the lots that are 60' X 110' or greater to S- ----- Planning Commission Minutes - 4- January 14, 1998 incorporate the Hollywood Driveway, and would propose to delete the 30% minimum requirement and allow the exact number of units be market-driven. There are two reasons for this request: 1) there are 5 parcels within the SPA for which this requirement applies. At the present time, one of those parcels has been exempted from the 30% and four of them are still required to do it. If the policy is good for one of the parcels, it ought to be good for all five parcels regardless of who the owner is. Secondly, Otay Ranch Company is committed to providing models with Hollywood Driveways; the remaining unanswered questions is, how many will be built, which would remain unanswered until the market has a chance to respond. It would be unreasonable to require the developer to continue to build houses for which there is no market. If it is determined that there is a market for this model, the builders will build them. Commissioner Aguilar asked for clarification on the number and type of model homes that would be constructed and where the model with the Hollywood Driveway fits in. In addition, she asked what criteria would be used to determine the success of the Hollywood driveway marketability. Mr. Aden stated this phase of the project would only be for the larger lots (60' X 110') and they intend to build three model homes, one of which would have the Hollywood driveway. The success of the Hollywood driveway marketability, as with other features of any product is closely monitored and is ascertained by sales representatives who are trained to be able to make these determinations based on feed-back they receive from prospective buyers. Chair Davis asked if the Hollywood garage would be attached to the house where you can enter into the house from the garage. Mr. Aden stated that buyers still prefer to be able to enter into the house from the garage, primarily for safety reasons and weather conditions, therefore, it would be their intent to have . the garages attached to the home. Public Hearing Closed 7:45 Commission Discussion . Commissioner Tarantino stated that the equity issue weighed heavily in his decision and felt that by having Council set precedence in granting McMillin's request to amend the PC district regulations, then in all fairness, the same latitude has to be extended to subsequent requests, therefore, he cannot support staff's recommendation to deny the applicant's request. . Chair Davis concurs with Commissioner Tarantino's statement and supports his recommendation to deny staff's recommendation. In addition, she stated that she is confident that Otay Ranch Company is committed to the pedestrian-friendly development concept and will strive to implement those concepts to the fullest extent possible. (/; - - _.__.__.._-_.~---_. Planning Commission Minutes - 5 - January 14,1998 · Commissioner Thomas stated that in all fairness to the developer, he needs to be granted the flexibility to produce a product that is market-driven, therefore, he too will not support staff's recommendation. MSC (AguilarfThomas) that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 98-02 recommending that the City Council approve the applicant's request to amend the Hollywood Driveway requirement, with the following two additional conditions: 1) that the language be changed to reflect that there will be a model home with a Hollywood driveway, instead of a model with the OPTION of having a Hollywood Driveway; 2) that staff work with the applicant in an attempt to devise a more formal means of evaluating and assessing public reaction to the Hollywood driveway. Motion carried (6-0-1) (Commissioner O'Neill absent) · Vice Chair Willett acknowledged the hard work done by staff in planning the Village concept and also in trying to bring an equitable solution to this matter. He therefore, urged the Commission to stay with and support the original Village concept. · Commissioner Ray stated that while he is cognizant of the equity issue with the precedence that Council established, and understands that these matters are market- driven, he urged the Commission to not lose sight of the countless hours and tremendous effort that was put into planning the original Otay Ranch SPA One and that the Village concept could potentially be compromised, however, he would support the Commission consensus as previously stated. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: PC5-98-02; Tentative Subdivision Map for the Eastlake Greens parcel R-16, Chula Vista Tract 98-02, involving 60 single family and 3 open space lots on 10.89 acres located on the north side of South Greens view Drive west of Hunte Parkway - The Eastlake Company. Background: Luis Hernandez, Acting Senior Planner, reported that the applicant has submitted a tentative subdivision map known as Eastlake South Greens Unit 16, Chula Vista Tract 98-02, in order to subdivide 10.89 acres into 60 single family and 3 open space lots. East neighborhood has a single access point from South Greensview Drive and a single interior street ending in cul-de-sacs. The residential lots are 53 x 89 with an average lot area of 5,400 square feet Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCS-98-02 recommending approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map Eastlake South Greens View Unit 16, Chula Vista Tract 98-02, in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the draft City Council resolution. Public Hearing Opened 8:02 No public input. Public Hearing closed 8:02 1 .'.-..--_.'.-..--- . ---_._.....~,,-_._,._...,._._~. THIS PAGE BLANK '1 - ..--.'"-..,---.-----,-,-"..,--.,---------.-'..-.-...- RESOLUTION NO. PCM 98-02 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE OTAY RANCH PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS WHEREAS, a duly verified application, PCM 98-02, for a Miscellaneous Amendment ("Project") Was filed with the Chula Vista Planning Department on July 15, 1997 by the Otay Ranch Company ("Applicant") ; and WHEREAS, said application requested the amendment of the Otay Ranch SPA One Planned Community District Regulations, Part III, Section II, Table III-3 to allow market flexibility in detennining the provision of Hollywood Driveways; and, WHEREAS, these Planned Community District Regulations are established pursuant to Title 19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, specifically Chapter 19.48 Planned Community (PC) Zone, and are applicable to the Otay Ranch SPA One Land Use Plan of the SPA Plan, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said amendment application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m. on January 14, 1998 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the City Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the Project and determined that the Project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061 (b) (3) "General Rule" that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and it can be seen with certainty that the proposed project has no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment and therefore is not subject to CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT from the facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission has determined that the amendment to the Planned Community District Regulations is consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the Otay Ranch General Development Plan/Subregional Plan regarding the pedestrian orientation described under the Village Concept; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council approve the proposal to amend the Planned Community District Regulations, in accordance with the attached draft City Council Ordinance and that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners ofthe property and the City Council, as follows: ! --- ---'._-.-"~-- "Garages for housing located on lots at least 60 feet wide by 110 feet deep (pads) shaD be set back a minimum of 30 feet and incorporate a Hollywood Driveway (see Village Design Plan) as follows: The model homes shall include at least one model being sited and constructed with the Hollywood Driveway concept and the minimum percentage to be constructed shall be determined by market conditions. City staff and the applicant shall work together to devise a more formal means of evaluating and assessing public reaction to the Hollywood Driveway." PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this day 14th day of January, 1998 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Aguilar, Davis, Ray, Tarantino, Thomas, Willett NOES: ABSENT: O'Neill ABSTENTIONS: Patty Davis, Chair Diana Vargas, Secretary 10 H:\HOME\PLANNING\BEV\217.RES ------. ., . ......... -- :.~ ;~~¡:::s ." .-.' Lo"3. J997 ?j::~:: 3 :,/)¡ ::¡ ; ,;i '1-- J · Em=ld Randolf, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, Dir or of th" C.A.S. T. program. announced that o~ JUD~ 25, tbey will be havÍDg a CAST Chula Vi~ta Dayal t new White Canyon Wat"r Park. She stated that s¡o-..:ial coupo"" worth $5.00 were available. Jt was th"ir . or fund rai~er for the year, they will get a percentage of what the W~ter Park will get for the day. · M...-)' QU2.rtiaDo, 4080 Hancock Strcet, .' 4311. San Diego. 92110, r"presenting the Revolting Gr.mdmas. r~uested that tbe City Council pass a resoluti in support of deploying the California National Guard lroops along lbe border regia"" of SaD Diego County s~nd it to GO"èmor \ViJson. · ..rson Street, Bonita, 91902, Founckr of Light Up the Bord"r, Slated that there a.~ a Dumber of families of ,der Patroi Ag"nts who ar" now und:OT great j""pardy ~s a r"suJt of intelligence passel! forward that Borde a1rel Ag::nts ar-e now prim:: targèt!' for th:: drug smu££krs.. Sh:: urg¢d Council to com~ up with a r-..soJutioD t will match those by Dth"r oili.os. . PUBLJC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLliTTO:'\S AND ORDINANCES 9.""'. PUBLJC HEARING POi 97..20: CONSIDERATION OF AN AME!\"D~ŒNT TO THE OTAY R.-\;'iCH SPA O!\'E PLAN ON PROPERTY GE1\'ERALLY LOCATED ON 1,110 ACRES SOUTH OF TELEGR.~PH CANYON ROAD BET\\'EEN 'PASEO RANCHERO A!\'D THE FUTURE SR-125 ..--r. ALIGNME!\"T _ McMillÎD bas submitted an am"ndm"nl and t"ntativ" map for th" portion of SPA On" owned by ! WeLF to subdivide 290 acr-..s c:r--"ting 1.877 r"sid"ntial units in Villzg.os On" and Five. Th" SPA Amondment proposes deJetiDg PedestriaD P~rk P-5 and Santa D"lphina Av"nue as a prom"ndal" str""t in Neighborhood R-II of Village ÛDe. Staff recommonds approval of th" rlOSolutions. (DirlOClor of Planning) RESOLUTION 18685 ADOPTING THE THIRD ADDE!\"DUM TO THE FL"IAL SECOND-TIER E."1RONME.'"TAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR 95-01) FOR THE OT A Y RANCH SECTION PLA~'NING AREA (SPA) O!\"E PLAN A.''D APPROVL'iG AN A~ŒND~ŒNT PCM 97..20 TO THE OT A Y RANCH SECTIONAL PLA.";"NING AREA (SPA) 01'.'£ PLAN, IMPOSING C01\'DITIONS ON \ŒICH INCLUDES THE Ov"ER.lù.L DESIGN PLAN, VfLLAGE DESIGN PLÀN, PUBLIC FACll..ITIES FINANCING PLAN ./;.,I\"D SUPPORTING DOCUME!\"TS, PARKS, RECREATION, OPEN SPACE A!\'D TRAIT..s PLAN, REGIONAL FACILITIES REPORT, PHASE 2 RESOURCE MANAGEMEf'<ï PLAN AND SUPPORTING PLANS, NON-RE1\'EWABLE E!'.'ERGY CONSERVATION PLAN, RANCH-WIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAJ'I, SPA O!\'E AFFORDABLE HOUSLNG PLAN AND THE GEOTECHNICAL RECOJ\'NAISSA.~CE REPORT 3. PUBLIC HEARING PCS 97..02: CONSIDERATION OF A TE1\ïA TIVESUBDlVISION MAP FOR 290 ACRES OF THE OTAY RANCH SPA 01\'£. TRACT 97-02, GENERALLY LOCATED OFF THE SOù"THER.~ EHENSION OF OT A Y LAh"ES ROAD SOUTH OF TELEGRAPH CA!\YON ROAD RESOLù"TION 18686 ADOPTL'\G THE THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE FL'\AL E!'.'1ROJ\"ME1'.ïAL IMPACT REPORT FEIR 95-01 (SCH #95021012) A!\D APPROVING A TE1\"T A TJ"E SliBDIVISION MAP FOR PORTJONS OF THE OT A Y RANCH SPA 01'.'£, TRACT 97-02, A!\'D MAKING !\"ECESSARY Fr\"DINGS - . 1. ~ Councilmember Moot stated he Deeded to ",cu>o him<olfb=us" this involved McMillin. and th"y wae clionts of j bis compaD)'. - II Rick RosaJer. Se:ÙDr Plann"r. pre~~nled th< slaff rcport and statcd that the application hy McMillin has h<~n n:\'i~w~ by s:..aff and th~ Planning COmmiF;!;iem ant! i!' r-::.::omm:::.m.1.:d for approval. Tn;:-, application has h~n found consistent with th< SPA Plan "'C"pI for th~ IWO am<nùmenl~ which ar< pn'p,,,cd. Th< lenlaliv< map propose~ 527 E:.Xh i bi±-~ . 'n.·'~_··_··__·_·__"__···_·____·_···"__'· _.... "I., ,~ :·~::¡~::::s '::.::;::: 3. ) 99ì ?'=~~ 4 5¡"g]~ famiJy :05id~ntial JDtS, 1350 multi fami])' units in the Villag: 5 core with a JO acr: d:m:ntar)' schoD]. ]5 ac:~S fDr paTi:s, 3.3 acres of CDmm~rcial Jand uses. and g acreS fDr Community Purpose Faci jti~s. COUDcilm6mb::: P..iDdDne statod that if SDG&E was propDsing to put their utili,y hDx under the sidewaJk and it would D~es5j:Zte an =~ment behind that fDr acc:ss, why would it nDt h: proposed to he at the other end of the sidewa]k so tbat tbe =ement would be the parkwa)'. CEff SWaDSOD, City Engio~r, statod that the existing cDndition, the way the uti]iti::s ar: pul in th~ trenches right DOW, you will see Dn the outer odge under the monolithic sidewalk, is the utility trench. That is where the el~trical aDd cab],: TV go. Then they have the transfonner p:d:stals h:hind the sidewalk hut still within the str""t right-of- way. 10 DO=1 siru.atioos, they alsD have a street troe easement there. On this panicu]ar pr~i::.ct. the utilities wi1l still 1>: iD the t:eoch under the sidewalk. SDG&E is concerned ahout purring the transfonner hDX within the parkway b=1!Se of the proximity to th~ traffic and the damage that wouJd he done if a car we"o to hit iL That is v,'by SDG&E v,'2Dts a sr:ocific =ement behind it. The transfonnen; would h:: put in plac:: with walls around it. so tbat tbe property owners wDuJd r:OCDgniu it. and it could share that common tr:nch with·lhe other utilities and th:.. =<tS~m::Dt for th:: SlT~t tr:::e:$. Tnis beiDg the time and place as advenised. the puh!ic hearing w2S opened. Addressing Council were: . Pat 3z.ITJ~, r~pœs~nting SDG&E, stal:.d that in som:: situations th::y hav::: unù:::r,£rouncJ:;:C] in th:: ha::k. For a-"ss, they p:ofer it tD be out in the franchised positinn in the City right-of-way. That way they do nDt have to go thrDugh p""pjes' yards to ser,"i~ the utilities. ]n this panicular sid",,·alk configurdtion. the prohlem that SDG&E is hz\"ing with it is that it is pushing th~m out of th::ir fr.mchis= position onto prh'at:: prop::J1)' r~uiring 1h~m 10 g~t 2n 2S~m~t fro:n th~ prop~rty own~rs. which in som:: C2.$'tS. wh::n it com::s to s::í\·jcing and maintaining th~ir package, whicb is under the sidewalk, th~y go into the ground (they do not t""r up the sidewalk) h::hind it and go uncl:..m2th. T!;2.t is when th:..y would b~ digging into a pri\'~d~ prop:::rt)' own~r's yard. Cil)' Council """"idered the following issues: - . Ped~;::";an Park P-5: should it he d::leted from Nei~hhorhood R-I I in the SPA One Plan? Mr. Rosakr s'.z:od tbat the issues invDh'ed in the pr'!i<::t fDcus Óri Ih:: dimination of Pedestrian Park P-5. Concerns by McMillin ar~ that they felt in Neighhorhood R-ll that the. lot siz.e,< Were sufjjcient to provide for Ihe pri\'ate re.:=tional n-"< of the neighhorhood. In addition. th::re were n::i~hhorhood parks in pol and P-2 in this neigbborhood to satisfy the Park Plan requirements of the SPA. Park P·5 i!' a . 8 acr~ p3rk. McMillin's prDposal U'2.S to elimin2.~:" th:.. park but maintain th~ p::d:!'trian connèction throu£'h to th~ rcgional trail acc~ss. In Village D~vdopment's proposai, they included the small pedestrian parks to meet th:: pri\'al:: r::creati(mal o::eds Df the Deighborhood. ]f the Council agr= with the applicant. then Council should adopt the amendment. If Council wants to s~ the Ped::strian Park in the neighhorhood. then Council should deny the amendment and dir<::t that a Pod::strian Pa~k b~ included in the tentative map. CDuncilmcmhe~ Salas askod the following questions: (]) What wa.< the rdationship hetween Park P-5 and P-6.3. (2) lf we wanted to retain Park P-5, would it h:: a puhlic park and would it he maintained hy a hom""wners association or would it he maintainod hy ao open spac:: district. (3) Wer:: there any physical harrien; or rcstnctions b~= Village vevdopment and West Coast Land Fund propenies which would imp::de the ahility of p""ple heing able tD utilize the parks. (4) What p~enta~e of credit would you h: a.,,<i~nin~ Wesl Coa.,t Land Fund or whomever the Dext prope~y owner would be if we voled to r::tain Park P-5. ()- Mf. Rosalcr r"-',?ondod that P-6.3 was in Villa~e 5. Nei~hhorhood R-Il is in Village J. McMillin is ~oing to put in their portiDn Df 1'-6.3 and the Pas"" which come,< down to the villa~: cor::. ]n Villa~e 5. th::re is a J 0 acre park (p-6); there is a 1.7 acr:: park (P-S) which is the Town Square Park: and there is a 5 aCr:: park (P-?). These are the public parb. Park P-5 would he a puhlic park that would he maiotain::d hy an Open Space Maiotenance District. Sin:~ :h~Te aTè pnvate str==t~ in Villa!.'::: Dc,,:::Jonm<::nt's nortion ~)r~~:::._.~~~~~~~_~~~.~,~~h.::,:~,,4:{_~~_~uhl_~~_.~~,?-=~~ I :,~ J:JU!:!>. / II I j",,~ 3. 1997 ...,.... .'... . ..... ?~~t: 5 ,j'~ "." .: :~UiT~ ID ~ .a p::d:::5trj~n a::tss h::.twc::.n R· J 0 .<::.:1Ù R-Il. \Vi:h :h::. Pc:út:~trjan ?.<::.d:s. th:::::rt: w[)uJd h::. somt. ~ ;f" ::-::stnclioD S:"'j:!: th:.y are. pri\'al~ parks and would h~ Dwn::::d and main:ain::d hy {ht: r-::siù:::nl!' of Iho~t: ne.j~hhDrhoods. I As far 2S pd: crwits, w. do not know "t this timo h~::auso the small park criteria hasn't h~en d~vd()p~d. Jf th.)' ; ::aID' ÌD wjlb a proposal si¡nj ar to ViJ ,,~~ D~\'dopm~nt's, staff would prohahly ho r~:nmm~ndin~ 50% h=use it D2S all of lb. fa:ilities which ato roquirw hy th~ SPA 1 Parks Plan. Tno d~vdopmont of th"t criteria is on th. work 2.g~nda for th:. ?.í:lTl:S and Re..:r~tion D~par1m:::nt in the. coming )'~r. * · Holh'Wood Drivewavs: should tho r~quired numh~r of HolI)'Wood driv~ways h~ rt:Ùuc"d? Mr. RosaJ.,. s-.ated that a Hollywood Dri\'"wa)' in tho SPA Plan is" plan that requir~s "n "L" shap~d horn. with :b. fa"'f' p:sbed to the ba:k of tb. unit. ]n som~ casos. th~ft' is a landsC>lp~d strip in th~ middk of the drive or Ü ::z.n b:. o¡b:r d~Drd.ti\'e material. McMillin was conc~med "hout tho mark"lahilit)' of those typos of units and proposed aJ:e.-¡:ativ.lang-uafe to what is in th~ ~xisting SPA. Staff is con:~med and hi<.< "ddr~ssed the marb,tabjJity issue b)' ÌDdi:ating that tho PJanninf Dir"ctor, if thq can pro\'ido ~videnc~ that thoso typos of units are not I:".Z.r1:etable~ hz.s the ability to waive the rc.quir:::m:::nt and replac~ it with anoth.:r d~~i~n that is consist~n[ with the viJlaf" desigD plan. · Pa¡i:u'z\,s: should r:sid:::ntiaJ slr:ds with parkv,:ay!' h::: usêd in lh~ arpli"canl~s r:::~ic.h:nlial n.:i,ghhorhoods? Mr. RosaJ.r s-.at:Od that a R"sid~ntial Str~t S""tion A is a $tr~t wilh parkways. McM ill in has indicated to staff i1:at th~ R~iè~tial Str=~t S~tion A is 3c.c.~pt4:lhl: to Ih~m as long 2..." th: im]i\'itlual hom~()wnc:r maintains the ?2.1:\J,·ay. 2nd tb:re is Dot a mast~r hom:OVo11c:rs asso:i:ition. "...-r"., Par......."!,' Stre=ts: should a m2S1::r hom::::own:::rs 2.SSD~iali(}n h~ r:::quirc:d to maintain thot op~n spa:::e and , . , · 1znds:::apmg? Mr. RosaJer s-.ated tbat tho Enfin::ering D"panmont hdi~ved that all th~ parkways. m~ior slop::.<. and tho additional landscaping tbat is in th. SPA Plan should ho maintain"d h)' th" hom""\\'n~rs. The conditions of appro",,! hav" h".n prepared 10 pro\·id. fl.xibBity to allow Council to pro\'ido staff dir:o:tion. What OVer di,,,clion is provided ~'h"n tho Op.n Spa:. Maintenanoe Distri:t is fom1~d. staff will ~n"ure that thos" faciliti", ar" included ~ilh~r in a Hom~\\'De~ .~...sso:1atjon or in th~ Op=n Space. Maint=r.anc.= District. Counci!m.m:"'r ?.indone 2Skt:Ù why would Council want to in:lud" th~ p~d"strian parkway in with the Hom~ownof$ .1o.sso::ation or :....,~ Community raciliti::s District. 'Vt'hy not lèli\'::: it to h::: th::: f~sponsihiIiI)' of th::: hom::.o\l"n~T. Mr. Rosal.,. s-.ated tbat would b. .:C'ptahle to staff. Th:: Planning Commission \\'as con.c.c:mc:u ahout common IT.aint.nan::e of it; tbat th"," be unifonn m"int~nance of the parkways throughout th" n~ighhorh[)()d. ]f lh~r" was com.."Don :ma.inI~an:::~ that would insure: a h::ttc:r quttlit)' of r~u:::strian :::n\'ironm~nt. J\1z)'or Horton :.xpr::ss~ that she had a COnCern wjth thi~ anti that the PJarmin;; Commissiun'!', recommendation was r.10st prudent. S:ot ~Il hom::.ov..Tl:rs tr::at th::ir Ittwm:: t:tlu:,1. Th~ purpo:-\.:- of hi1\'in;; th:=!':: rTOmc:nõiù::::~ is Lo create z ni::.r 2.mbi:.n:~ for i.h~ community. Th:::: only \I,,'a)' we wil] htt\'C ¡to :~s",UjanL:c in uoin:; !nttl is to inclm.l~ it in th::: ::o::unon main1::.:::z...'1::e. Tnis h:.in,g th:. tim~ and place 2.S adv'::rtis=-d. thè puhJic h::aring was op:::n;:u. .A¡ùùrcssing Council W~rc: · Craig ?ul-."U)'2rr.a. 2727 HO"èf A"=nuè. National City. rc:rr::::s~nIing McMillin Compani:::s. He st"lt:Ù th"t th.~ W2S an ..,-;i:1o in the papor whi:i, quostiont:Ù Ih~jr int~nt and commitm~nt to the Plan. He wanlt:Ù to pr::.<ent .. J for tb. T""...::ord a Est of the do:um.nts that ~O\'em tho tJ~sign of th. Pr"i~:t tlnd that they w",,, in complian:. of eaob 2nd evei)'on:.. 7:'1:')' do ha\'e four issu=s which ar:: "èf)' minor in nttturc~ anù the inl:::~rity of Ih:: Plan is still in pIa:.; th~y a:. oonsisl"nt with tho Gen~rdl Plan. the GDP, and lh~ o\'o;all Design Plan. H:: wantc:d to as!'ure (3 Coun:il that th:.y \t,1~rt commjtt~ to th:::s::: PJans. Hè ttddr:::ssc:d th::: four isslI:::s: ?~ i;¡:..;:~s , "- JU:1t3. J~;7 ?~~:; 6 Pod~s:rian P.,k P·S: H~ s"'l~d Ihal Ih~y ,uppon~d ,t>.lrs r~"omm~nd>.tion as wcJI as Ihat of tho Pari and R::<:ro.atioD Coznmjssion which is rocomm~ndin~ tho ~Iimination of this park. Tho total numh~r of uni: will Dot incr=~ with tho o1imnation of tho park. Ono of th~ r=ons for the cJimination of tho park w. r211y driven by the maintenance issu~. Staff is r~ommonding thai thore ho an Opon space Maintenanc, District fonn~ for th~ maintonanc~ of tho park. Utilizing an OSMD for tht maintenanct cro.at.s ; dibnma which st;;ff has not fully addr:"od. ]f only this noi~hhorhood Wert to ht ",sossed for th, maint~Danc~ for this park, thtr~ would ho a fooling of oxc)usivity and tho d~sire to pr""Jodo anyone els~ from acc~ssing that park if th~y had tht maintonanco rospon,ihilitits. 1f an OSMD Were us.d that woold b. coll::<:telJ from tho .ntire dtv<:lopmont, thore would ho a disagrtemont as to tho acc~ss, th: ability 10 walk to. and would cro.ate a prohlom in tho coll~tion of tho fe~ on th: :ntire pr'!ject. 1t cr""te' an inequit: that may cr:at~ a prohlom in the future. Thoy hdi~v~d tr..t if the park w..' det~rminod to h. an :ss:ntial part of tb: Plan and is to bo acc:ssihlt to all re,;dont'. il ,hould h~ a puhlic park. 1t should ho ownelJ hy tb. public and fund~ hy the pohlic. * HolJ)'wood Drivewa)'s: Th" Hollywood driveway conc~pt would apply only to the Ont nei~hborhood. R- 11. Th. Hollywood driveways hav" not hoen r;cently used in th" markotplac~. and th"y W"rt rductant to ac::~pt an absolut: requirom"nt for 30%. Th"ir pr;f~r~nc~ Was to bt th" mark"t dictal" the final pe~eD1.2ges. Rather than a prèscripti"è minimum of 30£. th~)' wouJd initialJ)' construct onè mod~J hom~ wIDcb wouJd ho on" of four. which would he 25 % using th~ 30 foot '~thack and th" Hollywood driv"way con~pt and th"n det"rrnin" th" mark~tplac~ pr;f~r~nces. If the hous~ ",,_< alr::ady huilt, th::n th"r" would not be a removal of that houso. 50 they would nOl h~ ah):: 10 ahandon Ihat IYp" of product: it would still he thor:, hut would ¡", plotl"d at a I::"::r porc::ntag". Tho)' would pr;f~r to adapt qu'ickJy hy mark"tplact d~mands as opposod to b"ing hurd~n"d with a "umh::rsom~ and lengthy proc~s.< of coming hack 10 the City to adjust 10 the mark"t pref::r.nc::,. , Par!:....."y Str""ts: 1t was tb"ir int::nt to rc.''P;ct th" wish..., of staff and conslruct th:: parkway as 1)'1''' A , i Str""ts throughout th~ pr,!j~t. How::\'e.r. it w~~ th::ir pr~f::r:nc:: not to h2\':: a Hom::ov.'I1::rs Asso::Ìation , , or 2n Open Space MaiDtenancè District funding th:: maint:i1znc:: of thos: p3rkways. 11 would h. th.ir prof",,,,,c. to utili:re CC&Rs which th~ City has th:: ahi1it)' hut not tbe ohligation 10 "nforc" that would pro\,jè~ instructions for e\'o:ry hom::own:r i!.' to th: n1aint:nznc: ohli~i!tíons and rt:~ponsihiIjtj::s. 1\12,Ster Hom~wn:ts .A..sso:¡ation: Th~y preferr~ to form the continu~ us~ of th" OSMD. Th:ir "'p:ri'DC: indicat::$ that som" horn" huy::r$ prof::r no.! to hav:: an HO.... Th"y hav" no pri\'at:: faciJiti"s wruen n~::ssitat; th; fonnation of an HOA. M,}'or Horton askod if th" mod:1 that McMillin would h:: huilding with the Hollywood driv::ways was mort ~xp=nsive thzn the oth=.ts b:ing propos::d. Mr. Fu!,:uyama ""..sponded that they did not know yet. 11 W.ê:!$ 10D n:w to knO\I,'. They have cOn$trucl~ a comparabl. type product in ono of th::ir other prc~j:::ts. They h:li~v:: il will h~ acc~p:ahl" and preferahl;. Th::y don't want to 't1: Ií::d 10 that in this mark:::t place: not knowjn,g what In:::: markr:t pref:r::n:::s wiJl no:. CouD=ilmemh:r Rindon:: z~l::=.d íor a claritication of the COl11m::nt tt..4:i1 he: WiiS wîIIir.~ to huilu Typ: A Str::.::ts throughout. But Typ: A Str~ts .iU~ only in two of th:::: n::i~hhorhoods. \Vas that \I.'hat h:::: m:::ant? Mr. Ful:uyama respond~ tha! th"y DaVt r;consid~r:d th::ir position. and they arc committing 10 doing all Typo A S!r=ots. ~ M2yor HOrtOD cJos~ the puhlic h""rjn~. /rL ~12'yor Horton s:.at~ that w:: ha\':: s::\':ral pJann::d communities in In:: East:rn part~ of Chu]a Vi~ta. It W2S h"r unö.rslanding that tho d:v:lo!",rs in thos~ C2.'::$ b\'" pr"tty much had th:: Opportuni¡y to ,::I:::t which way th"y would rath", ~o - an as':ssment di,trict or HO.... -' -. - -'. .;;;; I .¡. .. ?>O" 7 '. .. . 4- ~_ ../....,., . . . ~ / j / >:~. Rosale~ >:.::td 1r..1 in Ihe p;:,¡¡, Mc:,1illin in RanchD ð:J R:)' h., prcJj>".,::<J OSMD: :Ö"'Iu.k< has proj>DStd HOA. ·~~:lh~g~ D~\'~b?:o~nfs partion úf Vì1Ja,gt On:: 2m.! Fj\,:: .....'5 propos=-d ¡~ h:: mainl¿.¡in::d oy OSMD, hut wh~n th~y ;, "'¡"~Dl to tbe g'.:z.rd~ entr.m~5. tb~n eVt:.TyIhing h::'='Gm:: private so Ih::y Ì';¡,¡d 10 have tho:: BOA. So, th~r:: h<Œ bt.en f 2 mix. AS5i5tant City .I,tlornty, Annt Moor~, SLaI::d that what th~y n:gotiat::<J with Sunoow i5 thai th:y hav~ th~ option of ôo.:iding wbtÛJtr or not thty want to fonn a CFD or an HOA. Tho dtvdop~r has indicattd that thty want to form 2 CFD. Tbty 2rt proposing tho "'rot thing with Sail Cr:d, which is ~ivin~ thtm an option of doing a CFD or an HOA. It was btr undtrstanding that Sail Cr""k prtf~rr:od an HOA. Tn~ wa)' tho)' hav~ 5tructur:od tht agrttmtnt ·~·jtb Sunbow "-," Salt Crtiok is that th~)' have th~ oplion of d""idin~ on~ or th~ othtr. Jf they d""idt thty want to do a CFD that would bt suojo.:t to Councirs appro\·al. Jf Council d~cid:s that tho)' don'l W'dnt to do a CFD thtn :boy would bavo to form an HOA. Sinc~ that is a futuro 1=~i5Iativo action. staff cannot ;;uar-dnt"" that a CFD would bt approvt:<! by tht Council. Mayor Horton 5t.attD tbat it would bt htr rèComrotndation in this situation that McMillin should hav~ th~ option of goÎDg forv.-aro with th~ir p~f~r-....nc::. She had êI conc::rn ahouI tho: rr.aint:nancc of Ih:: parkways. Jl is easy to s:zy that all tht homtowntrs will roakt suro this is a wdl maintained ar,:a throu~h tht CC&R5. hut that i5 ::umbtrsomt. Ptrsonally. she 2~r",,¡J with tho Planning Corotru55ion to hav~ this included in a t)'pt of as5tS5rotnt ciistrict. Sht 2150 f,,1t tht COnC""'5 of SDG&E should h~ addr"",ed. Councilmtrohtr Rindont 5tattD h~ had m~jor conCtrn< ahout the elimination of P"ù"strian Park P-5. H" would lik~ 10 S~ this r~:.z.~jed be.:.aus~ th~ conc~pt that CounciJ h2S !ahorcc.J o\'::r \I.'~S 10 maintain the: Villa,gê conc~pt with 2::::05S to public p2rks. Ht was supportive of e"<rythin~ :xc"pt th" dimination of the park. (~ Councilmtmbtr Salas stattD that this has hoon 2 point of disa~r""mont hetw<tn staff and th" doveloper of Vill2~e ODt. but she it1t thai wh"" Vill2~t One was proposin~ th"se small residential parks. it was h=uso thtir idta of what would bt nto-t~ditiona1 and 5'...,ff fdt that it would t.a!,~ away froro that. Sh" felt that this do,," retain tht 5""5t of community more than the elimination of th~ park would do. Sho was willing to give the applicant thtir r~Ut5t and not put an imposition on thtro on ro2kin~ a 30 % r"quirtm~nt on tht Hollywood dri"twa)'s in return for the r-..t..--ntion of P2.."1: ?-5. .. ~ Motion on Holh'wood Dri'·ew3\·.<: MSC (HortonlP:¡óill:¡) to :¡dopt for fjr;;t r""din~ an amendnient to the PC Di<trict R"',.:ulation.< in regards to HolI)""ood Dri"ewaY5 in the langu,,:!e set forth in the sLan's report that mirror;; Mc~Iillin's propo<a!. Motion 2PpTO"tD 4..{)-o..l (Moot ahstaining). Motion on P:¡rJ.:wav Maintenance: MSC (P:¡dilJalHorton) to pro"ide direction on the i,,'ue of maintenance for parkways through a Community Faålit)' District consistent with the recommendation of the Plannin~ Commission. Motion approv::<J 4-0-0- (Moot abstaining,). Motion on Ped""t.ian P;¡rk P·5: MSC (P:¡dilJ:¡lHorton) to re!:lin Ped""trian Park P-5 and 1!::lve the m;¡intenance up to the de\'eloper to decide how they w:¡nttd to maintain the park either with :m HOA or ;¡ (FD. Motion appro"td 4-0-0.1 (Moot ab5'..aÏIùDg). . ". .. RESOLUTIONS 18685, J8686, A!\'D ORDL'iANCE 2709 OFFERED BY ~1A YOR HORTO~ AS AMENDED, -' titJes re:¡d, texts ",:¡ived. Councilmtmhtr Rindone S!2ttD ht bd concerns with the 2:ro lot lino product. Ho thou~ht that this w>s not ! S---finë.iiz.::d and would navt a chance for ano¡h=r Tt:\'i::v.'. Sin:::: thj~ \l..'a~ 4:1 n::w prodllcl~ h~ wanh:.d 10 Oè asSUT~ that -..------.---.,-- '- I ~. -- "', JlfI',L:"TES OF A REGù1..AR JlŒETL'>G OF THE CITY COV.'>CIL ¡ OF THE CITY OF CHL1..A "JSTA I Tuosday, Juno J7, J997 Council Cbambors 6:00 p.m. PubJic Sorvicos Building CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: PRESE!\"T: Counci]mombors: Moot, Padi] (am"ed al 6:05 p.m.), Rindono. Salas, and Mayor HOTlon. .-'I.BSE!'."T: Councilm:mkrs: ALSO PRESE)I;'T: City Managor, John D. Go ; Cj¡y Attorno)', John M. KalIoD)'; and City Cbk, BovorJ)' A. .-'Iutbdol. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGJANCE TO THE G. MOJlfE!\"T OF SILE\'CE 3. APPROVAL OF JlfINTJTES: Ap' 29, ]997 (spe::ial joiDl m""tiDg witb Planning Commission and Gro\>,'IJ¡ Managomont Ovorsigbt Commissio ";..Ma)' 20. ]997 (r:gular rn""ting); and May 2:1.,. ]997 (regular m~ting). I MSC (Moot/Salas) to appro~e the nutt:S of April 29, 1997; Mu)' 20, 1997; and May 27, 1997. Motion appro~ed 3-0-1-1 (Councilmember udilla absent and Cnuncilrnember Rindnne abSluinin¡: on April 29, 1997 bocause he was not in attendanc . - , ~. CONSE!\"T CALE1\'DAR (ltCIII" pulled: 6 "lid J 2) BALA!\ICE OF: ONSE!\'T CALENDAR OFFERED BY ]lIA )'OR HORTO!\', h""din;:s re.ad, texts ",ai"ed, pas.<ed and a rO"ed 5-0. 5. ~'RJT 'EN COMMU!\lCA TIO!\'S: Letler from the City Attorney slutin~ that the City Council did not meet in Closed St:Ssion un 6/10/97. s r==oDded that tho ¡:Uor b: r",,:ived and fil:d. 6. ORDNA!\'CE 2709 APPROVING AN AJl1E!\'DME!\T TO THE OTA \' RANCH SECTJONAL PLA_I\'?\1NG AREA (SPA) 01\'£ PLAN!\'£D COJlIJlfUJ'\JTY DJSTRICT REGULATJONS (first re:ldin~) _ McMillin bas submittod an amondmont for Villag:s On: and Five. Tho SPA Arnondm:nt propos::s chango¡; to Ih: Plannod Community District regulations concerning d:sign standards in ":ighhorhood R- J] of Villag: Ono. Su¡ff T==omm~ds Coun::il pla::e the ordinance on first Tt:adjn.£. (Djr:::::tor of Planning) Continued from the m~tin~ -- of 6110/97. Jlom was pulldJ from Ih: Cons:nl Cai:ndar. (fÍJ . K:Dt .-'Idon, repr::sonting Village D:vdopm:nt. ] ]975 EI Carrtin,oR""LS.è';'C:""" ~c,'O':':~c , ..':::.c c '____ r':...,' 'h.. "'''''''.. ....., _, ~ _ _ I ../ (ì : ,;:/ J'~~Ul~ )"~o )7, ]997 ?t:~= 1 ; driv~way CODC,,?t. Thore are five parcds withiD SPA ODe lbat meet the criteria under the proposed langWlge. What is a mystery to him is why would Council be adopting a st.andard that would siDgle out one of those five parcels. If Ibis is a good policy for ODe of the parcels, theD it seems like it would b~ a good poJicy for all of th~ parcels. H~ felt the CODC--j>t to bave the Hollywood driveway be market driveD was a valid one within the entire SPA. He requ::sted that ÙJ: Dew st.andard be applied, rogardless of ownership, in SPA ODe. Councilmemher Salas stated that during lbe discussioD on lbe Hollywood driveways, she wanted to see lbat cODcept because it was "" . old/Dew· Jook ""d it really creates a seDse of Deigbborbood ralber than the IDonolilbic kind of hDU5~S that W~ S~ wh~re. the. fo::a.1 point is tbe. gaT'2.,ge.. \Vbe.n she was asl:ing bt:r questions as to why the.re. weren't more parcels being considered, th: response that she got was that Ibis particular parcel was about tbe onJy one ÙJat had lots wid: enough to support it. Mr. Ad:n stated that was correct wjthiD the West Coast LaDd Fund ownership. There are four additional parcels tbat wouJd be withiD the Village Development ownership which would also IDeet that criteria. Not onJy the future but ÙJe presen!. He b:lieved we will acrual!y be the first phase of SPA ODe deveJoped and in that phase they have a parce] that ID:e!S ÙJ: 60 x 110 foot criteria, so lbe builder that wil! be building lbere wil! be incorpordting Hollywood dri\·......ys. What h~ qu~stions is why that builder will be held to a 30 % standard whereas the future builder in ÙJe West Coast LaDd Fund property would b: )dd to a market-driven standard. AI! he was asking is that w~ apply th~ markel-driven st.andard across the board. Ma;'or Horton asked shouldn't we address this issue-bY-;5-<ue when the project comes before· Council. Mr. Ad:n respoDdorl that h~ did Dot b:lieve so. This is the zoning ordinance that you are amending and the entire ,. SPA One, induåing their ownership, is sul!iect to this zoning ordinance, lbe planned community district n'guJations~' It was Dot dear to him why we're singJing out a parcel to exempt from a policy. - Mr. Goss staled that Council v:as fo:usÎDg on specific policy and took an action on it. He sug£:::stdlthat inst~d of ext~ding that polic)' to othe.r prope.rtj~ on an ad-ho: basis, if you havt: an int:::TèSl at all in pursuing the.-issu~, ÙJeD refer this to S'.aff for furtber analysis to see what the impa~ts would be on such an extension. Mr. Rosaler, Senior Planner, statorl that lbere wa.< one neighb"rhood in Village Development's first pha.'~ that would be affected by this. Staff has had injtial discussions·with that builder about this concept on his prop~rty. W: couJd have a report back to Council at a meeting in July. Assist.ant City Anorney. Ann Moore, stated the reason why this proposaJ applies only to McMillin's property is because this is pursuant to their application for an amendment to the SPA One plan. The evidence that was pr=ted at th~ last public hearing was based upon th~ir project. Ms. Moore clarified h,r statement by saying there was a public hearing hdd on ÙJ: ordin"""" itsdf and e\·idence was presented ¡'y the planning staff as well as c1evelop~ and wboever else v..'2.Dte.d 10 be pTt:scnt to make a presentation regarding that ordinance. Therefore, it could be adoptorl by Council tonight if they wanted to. Councilmember RiDdone Slated that it ta1ks about Hollywood driveways for lots that are at I::.a.<t 60 f,ct wid~. He suggested that S'.afí look at some of lbe older neighborhoods that have the Hollywood drive....-.y on 50 foot wide lots that do--..s have the gan!£e in the ba:.k, 4!I1d it does work. ORDINANCE 2709 OFFERED BY M..\ YOR HORTON, headin:; read, text wai\',d, passed and appnl\'ed 4..0- 0-1 (Moot abstainin:;). 117 7.A. RESOLFTJON JR679 J\g¡.æ.¡G FL"'DL" ON THE PETITION FOR THE OT A Y RANCH VTI..LAGE 01\'£ ASSESSJ\Œ1\! DISTRJCT 1\LJJ\! 97-2 - Village Devdopm:nt has formally p~tition~J the City to use 2Ss.~meDt district finan:ing for certa' punlic improv~ment to be located in Village One of th~ Olay -', "0 Jul) . 'J pricf::s. This was his main conc~m that his pap::.r work has. ~hOV.11 that mllJtiplic~' .In of unit prices has not a1w4-I) resuht.d in the: $uhmitttd hid price. He indicat~ that a mc:.ding h~ callt:cl wit an parti~s invo1vcd to look at thi: . Bob Arciaga, 4113 Sweetwater Road, Bonita, representing RC ¡¡scape, stated that they did make sever< errors in the addition, but they were not large amounts in comparison t hat the total hid was. The error that the did make is in favor of the City, and they were willing to work for at amount. 1t will not be a hurden for therr. He did not protest the last open space. contracts that were suhmi ~. They al50 had addition rrustakes. Councilmemher Moot asked if we could hifurcate Resolutio 8712 and approve Districts 3,4, and 8 only and the direct staff to analyze the July 22nd letter from Blue Ski and give Council a report hack at which lime a d~isio regarding Open Space Districts 11, 14, 15, and 24 co d he made. John Kaheny, City Attorney, stated that staff co amend the resolution as so sUited. Council member Salas stated that waS acce TO INCLUDE DISTRICTS 3, 4, AJ'D 8 OI'IL Y OFFERED B' 1\1A YOR HORTON, heading r . , text wah'ed, passed and apprO\'ed 4-0-1 (Padilla ahsent) with st:lfT t return to Council regarding D' ricts 11, 14, 15, and 24. 9. RESOLUTIO' 18736 APPROPRIATL'<G FŒ\'DS, ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDIN( COJ\iRACT FOR T INST ALLA TlON OF J\UNOR EJ\"HANCEMEJ\iS AT FIFTH A VENUE AJ\'D "C STREET, SECO AVEJ\'UE AJ\'D CYPRESS STREET, RIVERLAWN AVENUE AND KEARNE .-; STREET IN T CITY (0735-10-STL-23I) - On 6/11/97 saled hids were reCeived. The general scope of tr project involv the removal and replacement of deterior.ted street facilities at three locations: Fifth Avenue ar "C" Street _ ¡;:IDoval of the existing cross-gutter. placement of asphalt concrete pavement and crushed aggrega: base, and e installation of a curb inlet and reinforced concrete pipe; Second A venue and Cypress Street; Rived.-, A venu~ d Kearney Street _ reconstruction of settled cross-gutters. replacement of curbs and gutters, installatic of P. . C. pedestrian ramps, placement of asphalt concrete pavement and crushed aggregate hase, and all oth, ins lation items of work as shown on the plans. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Puhl orks) 4/Sth's vote rel uired. - 10. REPORT OTAY RANCH SPA OKE PLANJ\'ED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS 0 "HOLLYWOOD" DRI\'EWA YS - On 6/3/97, Council approved Otay Ranch SPA One amendments and a tentati' map for the McMillin Companies portion of the Otay Ranch SPA One Plan. McMillin proposed amending tl Planned Community District Regulation concerning "Hollywood" driveways. Council introduced the ordinance wi the market flexihility provisions for Neighhorhood R-ll on 6117/97. Representatives from Village Developme rel uested the same market flexihility for their portion of SP A One. It was recommended that the ordinance not 1 amended for Village Development without analysis hy staff. Staff was directed to return with a report on applyir the market flexibility provisions SPA-wide. Staff recommends no action he taken at this time. (Director· Planning) * "" "" Councilmemher Moot 1:ft the dais"" '" .01< Coun::ilmemher Rindone statèd that the report discusses the existing Hollywood Driveways that arc èstahlish.w areas of Chula Vista that were creatt:d a numhèr of yars ago weœ with a typical how;,e that was smaller in siu ar of a single story construction. Older devdopments in many ca.'es utilized sing1c:-c.ar garages with narrow aCCè drivè\\Oays. Both of those statements were not totally accurat~. If you look at some: of the neighhorhoods, you v. see that on 50 foot lots. they have Hollywood Driveways with single story homes and double gar.ges. He felt t information provided seems to try to offer reasons for not doing this when in fact we have examples to the contrar He has no problem with the Hollywood Driveway. All he was trying to do was to point out that the examples we -- not exceptions for not doing Hollywood Drives on a 50 foot lot frz Ken ~, Assistant Planning Director, statèÒ he: had no ùi~grè;èm~nt with Coun¡;ilmèmht:r Rinùone's staternen Staff has found that the lots in the older parts of town are ahout 130 feet deep. That was part of the issue tha: ,:::" L. :L.:J,. I . . ".::>/j:' J;'; Î (ì - - J . ::?' We: have: a lot of ]00 ft::d in d:::p:h. it h~~om=s \'t::ry difficult. That is why staff is $aying th<il in th::: futur~ planning of tht: \'illag:::s. if Wt: Wi:.ot to coosiue:r this on th::: narrower lots, \1,.':;: wilJ have to go to .a dt::t:pe:r Jot 10 make it work. Tht:n:~ an: some oth=f options such as gain£' to a z.::ro Jot lin::: or allow th::: garage. ÏiTa ilsdf to £0 OVt::f to the property lines. Councilm:;:mh::.r Rindon::: stah::d thtlt Mr. L:.e was corn:ct in that th:;: 50 foot wide 10ts, tht: property was deeper. However. he was familiar with a home that had a lot of only 100 f~>t deep. ACTIOK: Council received and filed the report. · · · Councilmemher Moot returned to the dais· · · >4< >I< * END OF CONSE/VT CAL£NDAP.. * * * ORAL COMI\IUNICATIOKS (There were none) PUBLIC HEARINGS A!\1) RELATED RESOLùTIONS AND ORDINANCES 11. PUBLIC HEARING PCA-97-04: CONSIDERATION OF AJ\ŒNDI\ŒNTS TO THE CODE TO CHANGE THE DEFL"IITIONS OF S1I1ALL A.!\D LARGE F AJlUL Y DA Y CAR FA1I1ll..Y DAY CARE - The proposed prq¡e<:t is an amendment to the Municipal Code to chan the definition of family day care and family day care homes such that they are consistent with re<:ent changes i aiifomia State law. Staff re<:ommends Council place the ordinance on first reading. (Director of Planning) ORDINANCE 2710 AJ\ŒNDLNG SECTION 19.04.093 THROUGH .095 OF TH fiJJ\'ICIPAL CODE TO 1I10DIFY THE DEFINITION OF FAMILY DAY CARE AJ\'D FAMILY DAY HOMES (first readin!!) Councilmtmh:::r Rinùon::: slatèil that hè uncJèTslood the int:::nt of state Jaw was expand by at least two children. Hè asked if there was any otht:T s4uare fOl?tage requireme.nt that gO:::5 along Ith this; it would appear to him that - the original premise for the nUl11hers that was estahlished for the child car enters was based upon minimai square feet. He supportoo the expansion of two mon:, hut he was intèr.:st~· there was any companion ]egislation that dealt with square feet. Ken Lee, Assistant Planning Dir~tor. stated that there waS no He felt that h=use there were other qualifiers in the law, e.g. that no more than thrt:è infants an~ carèd for' any time when Ihère are more than twelve children heing cared for. There are qualifiers that deal with the of age groups. This heing the time and place as advertised. the publi t:aring was opened. There being no one indicating a desire to speak, the puhlic hearing was closed. ORDINA!liCE 2710 PLACED ON FIRST ADING BY MA YOR HORTON, h",.ding read, text waived, passed and approved 4-0-] (Padilla ahs ). 12. PUBLIC HEARING 111-94-04: CONSIDERATION OF A STREET NAME CHANGE FROM EAST ORANGE A VE!\ür: OLYMPIC PARh.ì\'AY BETWEEN 1-805 A.!\'D WUESTE ROAD - This is a City-initiated application uesting appro\'al to change the name of East Orange Avenue between 1-805 and Wueste Road to "Olympi ~ arkway." The înteñt is to gain approval of the name change of the entire length of the roadway, hut to imp]e _nt only the segment hetween Hunte Parkway and Wueste Road, which currently COUIle<:ts to the ARCO Olym T r,<ining Center. Implementation of remaining segments of East Orange A venue to the west would only occ as the future stred segments are connected through to the east. Staff recommends approval of the reso]utio . (Director of Planning) /1 1- _ ,_.._.,--_._._._~- THIS PAGE BLANK --"-" -~-----_.__...._~,..__..__.,.._--_.,--_..-- - -------.---_.~._.~~_..~- -- - COUNCil.. AGEJI,DA STATEMENT Item No. - Meeting date: JuJv 22. 1997 ITEM TITLE: Report - City Council Referral - Otay Ranch SPA One Planned Community District Regularions on 'Hollywood"Driveways SUBMlllJill BY: Director of Planning REVIEWED BY: City Manager 4/5 Vote:( Yes _ No.xl RefelTal No. 3060 On June 3, 1997, the City Council approved Otay Ranch SPA One amendments and a tentative map for the McMillin Companies portion of the Otay Ranch SPA One Plan. In their Otay Ranch SPA One PJan Amendment application, the McMillin Companies proposed amending the Planned Community District Regulation concerning 'Hollywood" driveways. During the public hearing, McMillin's representative requested the amendment specifically include market flexibility provisions for the number of units to be built with this concept in Neighborhood R-11. The City Council introduced the ordinance with the market flexibility provisions for Neighborhood R-ll at their June 17 meeting. At that meeting, representatives rrom Village Development requested the same market flex¡oility for their portion of SPA One. The City Manager recommended that the ordinance not be amended for Village Development without analysis by stafE The Assistant City Attorney indicated there was no evidence presented during the Council public hearing for SPA-wide impJementation of the market flex¡oility provisions. The Council unanimously adopted the ordinance and directed staff to return with a report on applying the market flex¡lJility provisions SPA-wide. The Council also requested the lot width requjrements for 'Hollywood" driveways be reevaluated and compared to existing older neighborhoods in Chula VIsta with 50-foot lot widths. RECOMMENDATION: Take no action at this time. Village Development has applied to amend the SPA One Plan for market fleXIOility provision on their part of SPA One. Staffwill be bring the amendment forward to City Council as part of the formal review process. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: None. DISCUSSION: Village Development has applied for an amendment to SPA One to appJy the market flexibility provisions to their portion of Villages One and Five. Staff will process the amendment and provide analysis and a recommendation as part of that review. 21 -.-- .-..--.-.-.. -- -.-.-..---... At the June 17, 1997, meeting, the Council also requested that staff reassess the lot width criteria for the "Hollywood" driveways in relation to the 50' wide lots in the older existing neighborhoods in Chula Vista. Staff found that many of the existing 50' wide lots with Hollywood driveways had Jot depths of 130' or more, whereas even the 60' wide lots in SPA I are limited in depth to 110' and the 55' wide Jots are no more than 105' deep. Staff has prepared the attacbed exhibit to provide Council with the visual comparison between the three lot sizes referenced above. The existing Hollywood drives in the established areas of Chula Vista were created a number of years ago when the typical house was smaller in size and typically of single-story construction; whereas, the more typical house constructed in today's market has more square footage and is two-story in nature, requiring a wider building footpriIit to 'achieve good architectural proportions. In addition, the older deveJopments in many cases utilized single-car garages with narrow access drives. It is, therefore, the conclusion of the staff that utilizing a 50' wide lot to achieve the Hollywood drive would necessitate the creation of a lot deeper than 110' and, thus, the applicant would have to reconfigure the subdivision design which staff would deem to be inappropriate at this time. However, deeper lots couJd be considered and planned in the future SPA I West plan for the areas west of Paseo Ranchero. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Village Development has an existing staff agreement which wouJd cover the cost of processing any SPA plan amendment. A new staffmg agreement is required for the SPA I West amendment. ., 2;;L - -~-- ---'._".._'---".'_._~-----'- §ºoz ::;:Q.J......O cn"< =m 5' JJ '" .. - - _"''''(/) 2:iS¡¡;~ cn::rQ)- ~ GJ::!; ~ CD OCD CD ?JïJ~m -gO a. -;:::: I 3-0- '" '" I =",3 "''''''' to;?' wJJ~ 0 (/) "''''~ -"'''' C I "'''", - }> <0 ::r ° C ëD~- 0 _0'" Z m ",.0 m 0 3 -1 c:: ~:rcg. 0 }> "'- }> ::0 ;U m m }> » (/) en en en c c OJ * OJ c.... 0 c.... m m 0 en en 0 - , ~ ¿, - - 0 - ~ 0 - 0 0 - ;Z~ \J - /-------~ ::0 - ::0 - / \ o(/) G> - - I JJ \0 ~~ 0 - , :II :p - I , \J Z - 1-_ - '{f) 0 » . ~ l:. 0 - ' -- en r a> - m - , en :II , 0 \J rio , -\ » » m s:: ::0 ~ m m GJ Z 0 \':P 0 c , ~ s:: ::0 , m m :;: Z s:: .::. - 0 m -(I] z <. ~ ~c: - -. Z 7~ - GJ ~7 - rn ~ p s:. . ~ !¡ f (\ , . i - . () ~ I ,. I Z I -< [J! I 0 . ~ z !TI .... ~ > s: ?: m 0 g: ,. :II -+ !=' -c t1t 0 ~. -1 ~ tZ3 '---= 7 _ .J $ì ç ---l .' ~ '7'- rn (f) :t J c . /":::~.\':;)\ ::> --.-.- . .......".. '" .' .". -.- . 0 -I ~ ç =- 7"- m (f) -, JJ I 0 I '0 IC{' I \ ~ I .... 1 - - - - - - -- - - - JJ ü< c: -! JJ (;) m -. . " - m m- JJ JJ~ (f) JJ.,A » 0~ < m -! ¡gU\ r r - m -< JJ \ » , r t.J \ (;) JJ U1 \ . / \ Z ... ~((~ \ ~ \ o """ /' ....., ""D \ m ()~ '\ JJ .:. \ z ~~ ~ ,'2_/ ! -! . ~ / JJ ~&J ~ ':O':P \__ .. 0 ç; (f) , (f) ~ ç; CD -! ç (f) ^ -! . ç m =:I ^ m ] - j~ 12.1 - -- 'r , "- -village ; DEVELOPMENT V Quolif)' m.,l" pIon"'. ,ommu"utc< ,/n" J 07" JuJy 3, 1997 Mr. 30b Leit:r CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth AV!mæ Chula Vista, CA 91910 Re: AmendrnenJ to OtJly Ranch Sectional PÙl1Irting Area One Planned CommllPlity District Regulations D= Bob: Village Develop:n!m1: would like to rcqu::st the following IIID!mdm.."Ilt to the P1=ed Community District Regu1mons for Otay Rlmc.h SPA One. The stIIndards that were ~y adopted for N.;~nhorhood R-ll should ~ appropriately applied to B1l affected parcels within SPA One. A mi"imùm of 30% of the garages on housing located on lots 21 least 60 feet wide by 110 deep (p2.ds) shell be s=t back a m;,,;mum of 30 feet and incorporate Ii "Hollywood" driveway (s::e I Vill~e Design Plan). !ie-,'S':e:. ;8: ~Je:¡;h138:1:.88~ It 1~,. *Ihe model ho=s shall include at 1::25t one model vrith thc op1Ìon of being sited and construct:d with the "Hollywood" drivcway I CO!le=pt and the minimum p=entage to b:: eonsttuctf:ð. ,- ~J!!i;;ÌiÌ!e-'¡¡8 ê è. R 11 shsl1 be ~t:...-mined by m2rket conditions. We -will follow up -with the required deposit and appJicaíÏon necessary to a¡;hieve the above =endmcnt. Sincerely. , VILLA E DEVELDPl"iB-,rr ." ..".' . . , ..... . ,........... " ), K=ntAaen ;' ,·t. !,. \.., Vie: President ./ ¡ ':>. .... !:;¡"..,,::.... "'." KA: h .,.; '.;..:....' .2.$ ____ ':';ì "'.:..:/ ~~ . ...... . ........ . .... . . : ~~,~... .~ ~-~ ..,~~.~.~ C·'v..n1\199i'B..:..1.·,.... ( ,..:.':.. .~\ ,1,1'0o;;.. IP..___. ....' f" - ..,., I t, .," Q7/f'1~"""'" 1)!'õ.~:E)Car.:Unn:F.=;.... S:\.I1t:10'i-.õ)m:Du!·!D.::AÇ__..D ,..:', ..... ..J::::" . ' .' ." 'Icl. 6]!/,_2.U.l'jlH-:-U:, 61,-159-i3M ..~., .... \ -:' E'ih ih;+'~______M_ - .~, Village -, is'©rno\yJ~ .-, 'j)6 ¡¡.. DEVELOPMENT ,/ M I Or071~i Quality master pla/Jn~d communitÙ:s sinc~ 1974 July 8, 1997 _ \.1 I MI. Rick RosaJer Planning Department CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Rick: Enclosed is an application for an amendment to the SPA One Planned Community District Regulations. The proposed amendment applies the language related to Hollywood driveways approved by the City Council on June 17, 1997 to the entire SPA One area. A5 we have previously discussed, Village Development needs the flexibility to respond to market conditions related to the demand for Hollywood driveways on appropriately sized lots throughout our ownership. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact either me or Kent Aden. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, ~~~ Ranie L. Hunter A5sistant Project Manager Enclosure r;¿(p 11975 E1 Camino Real, Suite 104· San Diego. CA 92130 Tel. 619-259-293+· Fu:. 619·259·436+ - -_.~ "-.-----.--".-'.-'----- - THE ( (OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE S ."'EMENT You arc required to me a S131cmcnl of Disclosure of certain ownc~hip or financial in:ercsts, payments, or campaign contrihulions, on all mailers which will require discretionary action on the pan of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all othcr official bodies. The following information must be discloscd: I. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the suhject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. Village Development The Otay Ranch, L.P. 2. If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. James P. Baldwin Alfred E. Baldwin 3. If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. N/A 4. Have you had more than S250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees, and Council within the past twelvc months? Yes_ No....!. If yes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please identify e3ch and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants. or independent contractors who you have assigned 10 represcnt you before the City in this matter. Kim John Kilkenny Ranie Hunter Robert Cameron James Baldwin Kent Aden Alfred Baldwin 6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than SI,ooo to a Couneilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes_ No-X.. If yes, state which Couneilmember(s): , , , (NOTE: Attach additional pages as Dea:ssary) . . , Date: Julv 7, 1997 , 't!P/¡ . ~ natur of contractor/applicant (:¡ 5b¡ I!lb/lJ- a Cd{~Û'''' f'lJ¡ 1) m J n ilk n Vice President ~ ;!1l1~ '1. 7· Print or type name of contractor/applicant . Paso" is tkfillcd œ: "AII>, iJ1dÙ'idua~ finn, co-po.rotcSh.ip, jOÙll \.'auure, cmOCÎDlioll, social club, frarC17UJl orgal1izDuon, corporation., CSUJ.lt, UW't, rr.ccÎ"t:f, syruÐcmc, litis and an>, other cowLI)', cily QJW COUIllT)', ciry mwucipa/i,)', district, or odta po/iDeal subdi"isioll, or atl)' other group or COtnbUuzlioll acwag as D waiL" ------- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item: /'1 Meeting Date: 02/17/98 ITEM TITLE: PubJic Hearing: GPA-97-05/PCZ-97-03 - 1) Amend the General Plan for the property located at 675 Oxford Street to change the designation from Open Space/Research & Limited Manufacturing to Professional & Administrative Commercial; and 2) Rezone the property from R-I (Res. Single Family) and IL-P (Industrial Limited - Precise Plan overlay) to CO- P (Office Commercial - Precise Plan) - Palomar Station, LLC SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ;:¡I¿ (;{? (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No..xJ REVIEWED BY: City Manager f,.t1OI.. After consultation between the Applicant, Palomar Station, LLC, and City staff, it has been agreed that the public hearing for the above cases should be continued. The continuance will allow the Applicant to negotiate with various possible buyers of the property for final purchase and/or lease, including potential industrial development. Staff therefore recommends that Council continue the item indefinitely. /1/-/ -------,----~_...,~. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item: I~ Meeting Date: 02/17/98 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: GPA-98-01 & PCM-98-09 - Request for an Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Diagram, the Rancho del Rey General Development Plan, the Site Utilization Plan, the Land Use Districts Map and the Planned Community Regulations to create the C-2 Commercial Center District for the 1.6 Acres of Land at 820 Paseo Ranchero and adding and Modifying the Permitted, Conditionally Permitted and Prohibited Land Uses Applicable to the C-l and C-2 Commercial Center Districts II Resolution No. I ~9 ð'A1esolution of the City of Chula Vista Changing . . the General Plan Land Use Diagram Designation from Open Space to Commercial Retail, Amending the Rancho del Rey Specific Planning Area I Plan General Development Plan Designation from Community Facility to Commercial, and Changing the Site Utilization Plan Designation from Community Facility CF-l to Commercial Center C-2 for the 1.6 acres of land located at 820 Paseo Ranchero ß, Ordinance No. ;¿74n Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista Amending the Rancho del Rey Sectional Planning Area I Plan by Changing the Land Use Designation for the 1.6 acres ofland located at 820 Paseo Ranchero to the C-2 Commercial Center District and adding and modifying the permitted, conditionally permitted and prohibited land uses applicable to the C-l and C-2 Commercial Center Districts SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ß¿ REVIEWED BY: City Manager G.t fr;~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_NoX) BACKGROUND: Rancho del Rey Investors, LP, the owners of the Rancho del Rey Information Center located 820 Paseo Ranchero (southwest corner of Rancho del Rey Parkway and Pas eo Ranchero) will soon not have a need for the existing Information Center as most of Rancho del Rey will be built out over the next year. Because of this anticipated build out, they would like to market this property now for future sale. The current allowable land uses under a Community Purpose designation are highly restrictive and, therefore, the property owners are requesting the above-listed changes in order to broaden the permitted and conditionally permitted land uses for this parcel. Attachment I includes the necessary resoJutions and ordinance to accomplish these actions. The Environmental Review Coordinator prepared Initial Study IS-98-10, which resulted in an addendum to EIR-87-01 (Attachment 2). RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the addendum resulting from IS-98-1O for EIR-87-01 and approve GPA-98-01 and PCM-98-09, subject to the attached City Council Resolution No. _ adopting the amendments to the City's General Plan, the Rancho del Rey IS¡ Page 2, Item: Meeting Date: 02/17/98 Specific Planning Area I Plan's General Development Plan and Site Utilization Plan, and Ordinance No. adopting the Amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA I Planned Community District Regulations for the property located 820 Paseo Ranchero. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Planninii Commission' At its December 10, 1997 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve GPA-98-01 and PCM-98-09 subject to the attached City Council Resolution No. adopting the amendments to the City's General Plan Amendment and the Rancho del Rey Specific Planning Area I Plan's General Development Plan and Site Utilization Plan, and Ordinance No. adopting the Amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA I Planned Community District Regulations for the property located 820 Paseo Ranchero by a vote of 5 to 1 to 1 (one opposed, one abstained). The Resolutions and Minutes from the 12110/97 meeting are attached as Attachment 3. In addition to recommending approval of the Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the Applicant and City staff hold a public forum for the area residents prior to the hearing before Council. The public forum results are discussed later in this report. DISCUSSION: 1. Site CharacteristicslExistin¡¡ Use: At present, the 1.6 acre site is occupied by the Rancho del Rey Information Center, an aesthetically pleasing building designed to be a "visual portal to the Rancho del Rey neighborhoods north of East 'H' Street" (see attached Project Description submitted by the Applicant). Parking adequate for the existing use surrounds the building to the south and west. The building and parking lot occupy approximately half of the site. The southern half of the parcel lies within the SDG&E easement. 2. General Plan Zonin¡¡ and Land Use: GENERAL PLAN ZONING CURRENT LAND nSE Site: Open Space PC/OS-3 RdR Information Center North: Res.Med 6-11du/ac PC/RP Single Family Residents South: Parks & Recreation PC/OS-2 Fire Dept. Training Center* East: Public/Quasi-Public PC/CPF YMCA/SDG&E Easement West: Open Space PC/OS-l Open Space/Canyon PC = Planned Community OS = Open Space RP = Residential Planned Concept District * Also the future site of a public library. /-~~ c2 ____.__u_" Page 3, Item: Meeting Date: 02/17/98 3. Proposal: The proposal is to establish uses that will allow the existing Rancho del Rey Information Center, now functioning as a new home sales office, to provide services and minor commercial support facilities to the local residential neighborhood. To accomplish this, several amendments must be first approved, including: A. Amending the General Plan, the RdR General Development Plan (GDP), the Site Utilization Plan (SUP) and the Land Use Districts Map. At present, the General Plan designation is Open Space, the RdR GDP designation is Community Facility, the SUP designation is Community Facility CF-I, and the Land Use District Map zone is Open Space OS-3. These plans and maps, with the exception of the General Plan Land Use Diagram, are attached as Attachment 4. The General Plan, the General Development Plan and the Site Utilization Plan are amended by resolution, while the Land Use District Map is amended by ordinance. B. Amending the Planned Community District Regulations. This entails the creation of a new district to be called Commercial District C-2 and specifying permitted, conditionally permitted, accessory and prohibited land uses for it. The proposed changes and the original Commercial District Regulations are attached as Attachment 5. Briefly, these changes include the addition of land uses, whether these added land uses are permitted, conditionally permitted, accessory or prohibited uses in the C-I District, and the C-2 District as an entirely new column in the land use matrix. The provisions also address such issues as hours of operation and the sale of alcoholic beverages, among others. It should be noted that the Commercial District C-I is currently applied to the commercial area west of Tierra del Rey along East H Street. The C-I District has been in effect for several years and has allowed the development of the portion of Rancho del Rey along East H Street. The C-2 District will differ from the C- I District in that the C-2 District is proposed to be targeted toward smaller, neighborhood-type uses, where the C-I District is designed to accommodate more intense commercial land uses. In addition, where the C-I District has been applied to a comparatively substantial area, the C-2 District will be limited to the 1.6 acre parcel where the RdR Information Center is now located. 4. Public Fomm: A public fomm was held on this project on January IS, 1998 at the Rancho del Rey information center. Approximately 20 people attended. After a brief overview of the project, the Applicant's representative and City staff fielded questions from those in attendance. The main issues were: A. A desire on everyone's part to retain the existing building if at all possible because of its superior architectural style. /S~> -3 Page 4, Item: Meeting Date: 02/17/98 B. A suggestion that the City purchase the property and use it as part of the fire station/library complex planned for the property immediately to the south. It was suggested that contact be made with the City Manager's office to discuss this matter further. Such a meeting was set and two members of the community met with the City Manager on January 23, 1998. The results of the meeting were that the City Manager explained that the asking price of the property did not appear to be cost- effective for the City. It was then suggested that the community members approach the property owners for a possible solution. C. Staff was requested to investigate the original, planned life span of the Information Center. In interviews with the consultant who prepared the SPA I Plan and representatives from Rancho del Rey Partnership, it was ascertained that the original concept was to eventually convert the facility to a day care use after all the SPA areas were developed. However, upon discussing the issue with potential buyers of the site, it was determined that the building would likely have to be torn down in order to construct an appropriate structure for use as a day care facility because it is too small and not easily converted to use as a day care center for small children. With demolition of the Information Center building not being an acceptable alternative to the current property owner, a decision was made to proceed with the action now under consideration. D. Staff was also asked to compare the current C-2 land uses with those listed in the Administrative and Professional Office (C-O) Zone in the Zoning Ordinance. This was to address the concerns of area residents that there be very few, if any, retail land uses in the C-2 District and that it be limited to office uses. The purpose of and permitted uses in the C-O Zone are as follows: 19.30.010 Purpose. The purpose of the C-O zone is to provide appropriate locations where professional and administrative office zones may be established, maintained and protected. The regulations of this district are designed to promote a quiet and dignified environment for business administration, professional and government activities, free from the congestion and traffic of the usual retail business district. To this end, the regulations permit office buildings and medical and financial facilities; appropriate commercial facilities primarily for the service of the occupants of the district are permitted subject to special controls. The intensity of development of such a district is intended to reflect its environmental setting with /s-( Page 5, Item: Meeting Date: 02/17/98 building height and coverage generally similar to and harmonious with those of neighboring districts. 19.30.020 Permitted uses. Principal permitted uses in the C-O zone are as follows: A. Medical and dental offices and clinics, medical, optical and dental laboratories, not including the manufacture of pharmaceutical or. other products for general sale or distribution; B. Administrative and executive offices; C. Professional offices, for lawyers, engineers, architects; D. Financial offices, including banks, and real estate and other general business offices; E. Any other office use which is determined by the commission to be of the same general character as the above permitted uses; F. Agricultural uses as provided in Section 19.16.030; G. Prescription pharmacies, see Definitions, Section 19.04.188. The comparison of the C-O Zone and the C-2 District is discussed in the following section. 5. Analysis: General Plan Amendment: The General Plan Land Use Diagram currently designates the subject property as Open Space. This is an extension of the major natural canyon area extending to the west of the site. The Open Space land use designation is intended to preserve to the extent feasible natural open space areas and corridors, particularly the major canyons and valleys (Land Use Element, Goal 5, Objective 21 of the General Plan). However, with approval and construction of the Information Center in the early phases of construction of the Rancho Del Rey project, the site has assumed a professional office character as opposed to an open space character. The intent of the Open Space designation is clearly not being met through development that has occurred; therefore, a more appropriate land use designation should be considered. The proposed modification to the land use designation is consistent with the land use character that exists there today and is also consistent with the policies of the SANDAG Land Use Distribution Element, /-Ç~ ____________m Page 6, Item: Meeting Date: 02/17/98 previously accepted by the City Council, that encourages the integration of service commercial closer to residential neighborhoods in an effort to minimize vehicular trips and foster pedestrian-oriented connections and access. The proposed land use designation change to the C-2 District will provide these opportunities and is consistent with the existing land use character. Comparison of the C-2 District to the OS-3 District· As mentioned earlier in this report, the property owners originally planned to convert the Information Center to a day care center once its usefulness as a real estate sales office had finished. To that end, the OS-3 District permits day care facilities, among other uses. However, the floor plan and structural design constraints make the building impractical for use by day care providers; thus the property owner has decided to pursue the General Plan and SPA Plan Amendments now under consideration. Please refer to Attachment 6 for other land uses in the OS-3 District. Comparison of the C-2 District to the C-N Zone: The proposed C-2 District is similar to the existing Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) District now included in the Zoning Ordinance and used to accommodate neighborhood commercial services in various parts of Chula Vista. The primary difference is that the C-2 District would be more restrictive than the C-N Zone by not allowing many retail land uses, and the C-2 District will be applied to only the site under discussion in Rancho del Rey SPA I. The purposes of the two zones are somewhat similar in that the intent of the C-2 District is to act "as an area for small scale convenience facilities, primarily to serve the immediate local neighborhoods" and the purpose and intent of the CN Zone, in part, is to "provide a shopping center for convenience shopping in a residential neighborhood." Chapter 19.34, C-N - Neighborhood Commercial Zone, is attached for comparative purposes (Attachment 7). Comparison of the C-2 District to the C-O Zone: In comparing the proposed C-2 District to the C-O Zone, it was found that the permitted uses in the C-O Zone are basically the same as those in the C-2 District with the exception that agricultural uses and pharmacies are not permitted in the District. The C-2 District does permit such uses as retail bakeries, barber and beauty shops, clothes cleaning pick-up agencies with incidental pressing, day care and nursery schools, educational institutions, public/quasi-public uses, places of worship, social and human service facilities, which are only permitted in the C-O Zone with the issuance of a conditional use permit. The C-2 District includes wording that certain retail uses may occupy the site with Planning Commission approval of the land use (Item 28 under Service & Commercial). Chapter 19.30, C-O - Administrative and Professional Office Zone, is attached for comparative purposes (Attachment 8). /þ~¿,. _.~_..____u._ Page 7, Item: Meeting Date: 02/17/98 All conditionally permitted land uses in the C-2 District are subject to a Planning Commission public hearing, whereas many of the conditionally permitted land uses in the C-O Zone can be processed by the Zoning Administrator at staff level and are not required to go before the Planning Commission or the City Council. Application of the C-2 District· It should be noted that the only property to which the C-2 District will be applied is 820 Paseo Ranchero, the Rancho del Rey Information Center. This is the only property in the SPA I area capable of containing the land uses proposed in this amendment. All other land is designated either residential, employment park, the C-I District, open space or community purpose facility. In addition to the above factors listed when comparing the C-2 District to other zones and designations, there are two other safeguards built into this district which preclude many land uses. First, the hours of operation are limited. In Section Q on page 13 of the revised regulations, businesses may not operate between the hours of II :00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. unless specifically approved by the Zoning Administrator. Second, the sale of alcoholic beverages is prohibited in the C-2 District. This will make the site undesirable to several types of potential developers including mini-marts and restaurants that sell such beverages. 5. Conclusion: Staff has concluded that the proposed General Plan Amendment for this site from Open Space to Commercial Retail is appropriate, in light of the existing utilization of this property as an office, and the compatibility of limited commercial and office uses with the surrounding area. The proposed C-2 District would restrict the allowable commercial and office uses to those which would be most compatible with adjoining residential and open space areas and would require Conditional Use Permits for those uses which may require additional use restrictions. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the attached Ordinance and Resolution. FISCAL IMPACT: The full value of the property as C-2 District land is unknown at this time. Market forces will dictate the true value in time when an appropriate land use is proposed for the property. At that time, fiscal benefits to the City will be evaluated and established. The Applicant is paying staff costs related to the processing of this General Plan Amendment and SPA Plan Amendment. Attachments I. City Council Resolution No. 6} City Council Ordinance No. ,¡,# Addendum to EIR-98-01 (lS-98-01) Resolutions and Minutes from the 12/10/97 Planning Conunission on this Item ~~ /5--- 7 - _.~--,--~ -,-".--------- Page 8, Item: Meeting Date: 02/17/98 3. Locator Map, General Development Plan, Site Utilization Plan, Land Use District Map 4. ø;roposed Rancho del Rey SPA I Plan Amendments and Current C0111111ercial Center District Regulations 5. hapter X: Open Space, from fhe RdR SPA I Plan District Regulations ~ Chapter 19.34, C-N - Neighborhood C0111111ercial Zone <fJ Chapter 19.30, CoO - Administrative and Professional Office Zone D~ (h:\home\planning\martin\rdr\spal \9809pc. rpt) ~ /þ'--5 ..... .--.....-----.- . Exhibit "A" ::zz- ~ -~ - . j ',-L_' ( Ì':/; / '- / / . ~ - ,', <"v'> I ì CI ì rr--'ì--... -''', , , . '" I / ,------I ¡ ,__' , I /'~ I" / ~j i 1=' GW~ '""'// ! I U . r-'ì /\ EASEMENT I~ 1--/ I / Ä ' I--} I I -! \' \/ / I / DISCOVERY I-,! ! ! V'\ / / \ / ELEMENTARY ~' BIS~AY ~UBDIV:SIDN \ \ MARBRISAS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES I( APARTMENTS H '\ Y \ / \ (128) ¡----..\ / \ I ~/ / ~ i / Y.M.C.A. \ ,.../ ~Cf¡O .~...- OEL R ~......-, DPEN SPACE PROJECT A t LOCATION "1..s¿:-o 1l4~ ~/ MARBRISAS Cf¡El?o ( APARTMENTS . "-. (144) CITY DF CHULAVISTA ~ "'-.. ~ FIRE DEPARTMENT ". ~/ TRAINING TOWER '\ " FUTURE LI~RARY SITE / ' :' / / /? I ¡ , , \\ / ~\ \ ~. /.// \ \ // '5.'<--~~ 0:,r¡,- \ \,.----- / s \ \~\ \ ~ __, \ ì I \- " /' ,\ ... r; / ~~S'\ \ \ \ ~Y~', -\ \ \: ...-~ /'.\ \ \\. LEGEND L- ~ \W ~I/JAFRDMGENERALPLAN t /' \ \ V \ DESIGNATIDN ~ -, --\.-- os (OPEN SPACE) TO , \ ~--í'\ \ "y/'" CR (COMMERCIAL RETAIL) ~ ' ~ 0 ''H & FROM OS-3DESIGNATION ~ \ \ \. ~ \---. ,TO C-2 / \ \,~ . '. ¡.-.--- , \. \ \ ! \ \ .___', I i C HULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR ~~~;k: R,D,R, Investors LPIRDR PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROJECT 820 Paseo Ranchero Request: Proposal to sstabllsh uses that will allow the existing R.D.R. ADDRESS: Information Center to provide services and minor commercial support SCALE: FtLE NUMBER: facilities to the local residential neighborhood. NORTH No Scale GPA-98-01 Related Case: 15- & PCM-98-09 h:\homelplanning\carlosllocatorslgpa9801.cdr 2/9/98 /5- RESOLUTION NO. /~903 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM DESIGNATION FROM OPEN SPACE TO COMMERCIAL RETAIL, AMENDING THE RANCHO DEL REY SPECIFIC PLANNING AREA I PLAN GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY FACILITY TO COMMERCIAL, AND CHANGING THE SITE UTILIZATION PLAN DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY FACILITY CF-1 TO COMMERCIAL CENTER C-2 FOR THE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 820 PASEO RANCHERO A. RECITALS 1. Project Site WHEREAS, the parcel which is the subject matter of this resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description herein consists of approximately 1.6 acres currently designated by the General Plan as Open Space, by the General Development Plan as Community Facility and by the Site Utilization Plan as Community Facility-1, and is located in Rancho del Rey, Sectional Planning Area I, at 820 Paseo Ranchero (Southwest corner of Rancho del Rey Parkway and Paseo Ranchero)("Project Site"); and, 2. Project Applicant WHEREAS, a duly verified application, GPA-98-01, for a General Plan Amendment was filed with the Chula Vista Planning Department on September 15, 1997 by Rancho del Rey Investors, LP ( Applicant); and 3. Project Description WHEREAS, said application requested a change to the General Plan Designation from Open Space to Commercial Retail, the General Development Plan Designation from Community Facility to Commercial and the Site Utilization Designation from Community Facility CF-1 to Commercial Center C-2 for the property located at 820 Paseo Ranchero ( Project); and 4. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on December 10, 1997 at which time the Planning Commission voted _ to _ adopting Resolution No. GPA-98-01 H:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\RDR\SP A1 \9801CC.ORD ;S-/Jj - _.._-..__.~ ----" -- ---- ---_.._-~. Resolution No. _ Pafie #2 recommending that the City Council approve the Project in accordance with City Council Resolution No. ; and WHEREAS, from the facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission has determined that the Project is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and that public necessity, convenience, and good zoning practice support the amendment; and 5. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista January 13, 1998 to receive the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same. NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: B. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence on the Project introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on this project held on December 10, 1997 and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. C. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Environmental Review Coordinator determined that the project falls under the purview of EIR-87-01 and that an addendum to this environmental impact reports is the only environmental document required for this project, as documented in IS-98-10. Based upon the recommendations of the Environmental Review Coordinator, the City Council does hereby adopt the Addendum issued on IS-98-10. D. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council does hereby find that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Coordinator was reached in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista. H:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\RDR\SP Al \9801 CC.ORD J~(/J ~ ~ . . --_._--_.--_._-,---~-_..._.- Resolution No. _ Page #3 E. FINDINGS The City Council hereby finds that the amendments are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and that the public necessity, convenience and general welfare and good zoning practice support the change of the General Plan designation from Open Space to Retail Commercial, and of the General Development Plan from Community Facility to Commercial, and of the Site Utilization Plan from Community Facility CF-1 to Commercial Center C-2 for the property located at 820 Paseo Ranchero. F. COUNCIL DIRECTION The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby adopts the amendments to the City's General Plan Land Use Diagram as shown on Exhibit "A", the Rancho del Rey General Development Plan as shown on Exhibit "B" and the Site Utilization Plan as shown on Exhibit "C". All exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference. G. EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS RESOLUTION This amendment to the General Plan shall take effect and be in full force the thirtieth day from its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by Bob Leiter ~.~~o~ John Kaheny Director of Planning City Attorney H:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\RDR\SP Ai \9801CC.ORD /5/}:3 ---- _._-~.._.~-" ORDINANCE NO. e:< 7,.23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA I PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 820 PASEO RANCHERO TO THE C-2 COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICT AND ADDING AND MODIFYING THE PERMITTED, CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED LAND USES APPLICABLE TO THE C-1 AND C-2 COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICTS A. RECITALS 1. Project Site WHEREAS, the parcel which is the subject matter of this resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description herein consists of approximately 1.6 acres currently designated as the OS-3 Open Space and is located in Rancho del Rey, Sectional Planning Area I, at 820 Paseo Ranchero (Southwest corner of Rancho del Rey Parkway and Paseo Ranchero)("Project Site"); and, 2. Project Applicant WHEREAS, a duly verified application, PCM-98-09, for a Miscellaneous Amendment was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on September 15, 1997 by Rancho del Rey Investors, LP (" Applicant"); and 3. Project Description; Application for a Miscellaneous Amendment WHEREAS, said application requested the creation of the C-2 Commercial Center District, a change of the land use designation for the 1.6 acres of land located at 820 Paseo Ranchero to the newly created C-2 Commercial Center District from OS-3 Open Space, and adding and modifying the permitted, conditionally permitted and prohibited land uses applicable to the C-1 and C-2 Commercial Center Districts as specified in Exhibit "0" attached hereto ("project"); and 4. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on December 1 0, 1997 at which time the Planning Commission voted _ to _ adopting Resolution No. PCM-98-09 H:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\RDR\SPAl\9809CC.ORD /58 -~/ ~-_.__._-_._----_. ---~ ---.--..--,.. Ordinance No. _ Pa~e #2 recommending that the City Council approve the Project in accordance with the attached draft Ordinance No. ; and WHEREAS, from the facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission has determined that the Project is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and that public necessity, convenience, and good zoning practice support the amendment; and 5. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista January 13, 1998 to receive the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same. NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: B. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence on the Project introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on this project held on December 10, 1997 and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. C. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Environmental Review Coordinator determined that the project falls under the purview of EIR-87-01 and that an addendum to this environmental impact reports is the only environmental document required for this project, as documented in IS-98-10. Based upon the recommendations of the Environmental Review Coordinator, the City Council does hereby adopt the Addendum issued on IS-98-10. D. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council does hereby find that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Coordinator was reached in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista. H:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTJN\RDR\SP Al \9809CC.ORD ) f'ß'~ Î' Ordinance No. _ paee #3 E. COPIES TO BE PROVIDED Applicant shall provide fifty (50) copies of the amended pages to the Planning Department within thirty (30) days of the date of the approval of this Ordinance. F. FINDINGS The City Council hereby finds that the amendment is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan as amended by City Council Resolution No. _, and that the public necessity, convenience and general welfare and good zoning practice support the creation of a new land use district called C-2 Commercial Center District, a change of the land use designation for the 1.6 acres of land located at 820 Paseo Ranchero to the newly created C-2 Commercial Center District, and adding and modifying the permitted, conditionally permitted and prohibited land uses applicable to the C-1 and C-2 Commercial Center Districts. G. COUNCIL ACTION The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby adopts the amendments to Chapter IX-B: Commercial Center Districts of the Rancho del Rey Specific Planning Area I Plan Planned Community District Regulations as shown on Exhibit "D" and the Land Use District Map as shown on Exhibit "E". All exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference. H. EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force the thirtieth day from its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by Cc- 1Vk'Tl 'h... ~n9-----. _ Bob Leiter John Kaheny Director of Planning City Attorney H:\HOME\PLANNlNG\MARTIN\RDR\SP Al \9809CC.ORD /5ß3 I" 'c,/ _ __.._...__'~...__m'_··_ jJ /If' RECEIVED '58 FEB17 AID :09 February 17, 1998 CITY ßr CHULA VISTA The Honorable Members of The Chula Vista City counc:iOlTY LERK'S OFFICE City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: OPPOSITION TO CASE # PCM-98-09!GPA-98-01 Dear Council Members I, Thierry F. DiMatteo, owner of the property at 799 Avenida De La Barca, Chula Vista CA, oppose to the re-zoning of the Information Center located at Southwest corner of Paseo Ranchero and Rancho Del Rey Pkwy. When I purchased my property I was informed that the information center and its lot would be converted into a Day Care center once McMillan vacated the premises. I then made the decision to purchase this property which over looks the proposed site based on that information (See Attached Map) . Council Members should not condone this bait and switch tactic on the part of the developers. It is the duty of this Council to insure that representations relied upon by families are not altered by the legislative process. This Council should not be participants in this type of tactic, which is clearly against the interests of your constituents. Now, the Rancho Del Rey Investors have decided to request the council to re-zone the property to increase their profits at my expense and the expense of my neighbors. The re-zoning of this property will increase activity, traffic, congestion, and noise thus reducing the value of my property. I request that the Rancho Del Rey Investors not be granted approval of this project and be forced to honor their promise to this community. Approval of this project may lead to litigation by myself and other home owners. Sincerely 'ý ¿7/--;?~b Thierry F. lMatteo 799 Avenida De La Barca Chula Vista Ca, 91910 _ --.---..-... __ -, " " / ( !~¡ 1 ')/ / Iì / ' '(~~ /.."'~/J/ '-.!! I I. : ! / 'J 'ì:/ // / " ,~-'"- /~J"¡ , / ;---- . I I .... / . ".// / : I I ' ',~ , i X· / ~ "D,G~, / '--.I , ! ---< / /, ¡':';;,M,,,, / I ' I -....r ,!. / - ! . I ~ -,./ I /\ ~ ' 'I I ¡I" '- I. / \ ~ I' '---: /) 'J' / / \ I ¡! , I l \ " " . I . / mSCOV:RY -----' I I V, ' / \ ¡ I I , ,\ " a.EM=NíA.~Y _ BIS"AYSUBOI\~SION '. ,/ / /1 \ W,RS!<!S/.S ~Nõ~ ,IJ,\!~\ ",Si:,":'S /(0 / \ ;,pA¡¡¡M,h1S :--' '( \~( Y \/ n2BI I \ \ /, I I. \ Y.MC.A. P.,o l,,~ ' '-/1,'0 . ~ ~ '- ~ oL ROY PAR¡('I<~' '- / ~.< 0.,..,.··, ~ ¡<.Ò' ....n.......... ,,0 .... ~ .,~ j'.....,,' "- -'0 . MA.'.5!<!SAS " PROJECT I/.q,yCltf-9 ,7 ;,p;';¡¡M:h1S ", LOCATION '0 "" I''') CITY Of C,""U.VG:A " ~ A'':O:·AñTII':'" ''('~~/" TRA1N\N~ TOWEñ . & FUTU?':UBRA!!Y SIT! « "... \ \ \\...-"'" :- '¡- \ i \ L :ìì r J ,I ,r --:DR\SPAM8D9Cc.NOT] ,-_ -.-. ,_,~, " .,,,. -" ,'-' V..II::JI-LVI'o j~ UIUjV'/ jl.S~ ~Od VIN~O::lIWJ 'VlS'^ V1nHJ 30 ovonlJ V130 lYdlJlNnW Of3SNOJ 130 VJIlSnd VIJN310nV 30 NOIJVJHIION ¿ J .~_.__._._.______...___._~______ '~ ?') . ' . RECEIVED Petition '98 FÐi 17 A9:02 CITY OF CHULA VIS! ,\ Chula Vista City Council C¥Y CLERK'S OFF!' To: ebruary 11,1998 From: Residents of R~cho Del Rey V.D.C. Biscay Subdivision Subject: Proposal by the R.D.R. Investors LPIRDR to rezone the Information Center at 820 Paseo Del Rancho into a commercial c-2 property . We the undersigned property owners and/or residents do not object to the proposed rezoning of the Information Center property. However, we do object to any commercial permit that would significantly allow an increase in traffic and/or noise beyond the normal working hours, ie: 7a.m. to 7p.m,. We feel that by rezoning the subject parcel it will attract more commercial buyers, and if sold, ~ buyer may have to expand the existing building or demolish it and rebuild to increase the square footage to make it more economically feasible. Demolishing the Information center would destroy a very desirable landmark. Therefore, we encourage the city to consider purchasing the property and using it in conjunction with pl¡mned fire station! training center and librarry. We recommend that the city undertake a cost feasibility study to de~rmine what options, if any, are available. cc: Chula Vista City Manager Chula Vista City Clerk Craig Fukuyama, Rancho Del Rey Investors Constance Byrum, Mc Millan Development ,------.-.-'..... . .._._.._._,_,__,__..__._....m_~__..._.~___.___._..~___.__.___.n.___.'._"' -_._-_..~ Biscay Residents Signatures 6403232200 ~. GUTIERREZ FRED L&REMEDIOS D\ / f-t.d~/v<..-RJ____ . CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403232500 SCOTTO DOMINICK R JR&VEL@A M\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 411tJ~1A--' 6403232800 ~)lélJ!(¿ tit' / - JAMIESON BRUCE R&CATHERINE L\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403233100 ^ha^¥ BRETON GARY &DEBORAH R\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403233400 ~~Y)C-rj CONNAUGHY ROBERT D&TERESA L\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403233700 ~- (.~ ~ DEVORE ALAN R&LEEANN\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403234000 9"~ ? oi1.LL- MELAD JAIME P&SOLEDAD M*SWJTi4rMELAD CHULA VISTA CA 91910 tI~ 111.~~~~ 6403232300 RESENDEZ VICTOR M&SHARON M\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 1/ 6403232600 ~'"~ , FIGY DAVID R&MARITZA M\ I ,( CHULA VISTA CA 91910 0/ ' \ '- -".._~-----_.. . .----.,,-- _....~----_._-_._.- .'. ---- ,. ..___._..___._"_._'..__n_________._____.""'___'... .H__'__'_ 6403232900  I '- t, LEWIS JOHN W*MWS025%jr,LEWIS NUNILA *S L~ (~1-- :c iif "'" \. c ,-) .L--'L.. CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403233200 VERA EVENCIO&ELISA \ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ~ , 6403233500 ,17 ! / ~; FELICIANO ANTONIO H&RASELA VI C /~ ¿ (Jr:(7; / uc> CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403233800 -~ PEARSON DIANE\ ~~~4U/ ~ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403232400 SANDOVAL PORFIRIO\ j;:" . -. CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403232700 f1J H. ¡V¡'-I\flCOn" lÆ--- ~)1~ MCBROOME MELVIN H III&TERESA S\ . - I CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403233000 DIMATTEO THIERRY F\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 ¡(M~ 6403233300 HAAS MARK G&TONI E CHULA VISTA CA 91910 O£U- fVl~ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403233900 BRATCHER CHARLES&KINGSTON SUSAN\ CHULA VISTACA91910 -~-_.,._. ,..... _..,.._____.___._~.__~__~._,~___...__.._. .. _..,_..__.._'u.___..___.m.___._____ 6403232900 ¡/LEWlS JOHN W·MWS025%jr,LEWIS NUNILA·S CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403233200 VERA EVENCIO&ELISA\ CIlliLA VISTACA 91910 6403233500 AELICIANO ANTONIO H&RASELA V\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403233800 AEARSON DIANE\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403232400 SANDOVAL PORFIRIO\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403232700 \..,.-MCBROOME MELVIN H III&TERESA S\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403233000 DIMATTEO THIERRY F\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403233300 HAAS MARK G&TONI E )~.l_ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403233600 ~TINEZ ALBERT&IRMA D\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 ~.~... ¿.c:::__:-".__.. 6403233900 "-'--"'''-'~''_'':'''''>.." BRATCHER CHARLES&KINGSTON SUSAN\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 -----~"._.__..._._._,-_._-_._,,------_.,_.._..-.._----_._.."----~----_._._--_._-- ._.._-~.~._.._'--'_.._-'." "-"-'~- .---- 6403212400 VIAS EDGARDO C&ROSAMILIA D\ CHULA VISTACA91910 6403230100 KECHlER REVOCABLE TRUST 03-08-96\ ., CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230400 PERIOLA IRWIN K&VICTORIA E\ . CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230700 GARCIA JUVENTINO'SWJT#,FORTANEL CIND CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403231000 DEMESA ARMANDO L&ELSIE V\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403231300 ~-'. WURTH ROY S&MARSHALL MICHELE J\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403231600 ~ 7 'lrül)-< BAXTER HARRY F\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 L 6403231900 EWINGPATRICIAA\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403224200 BA YSIC PRUDENTE F&ALEGRIA M\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230200 MEDRANO JOSEPH A&BRATILAND-MEDRANO CHULA VISTACA 91910 -- ----~-_.._..,_._..._-- ',- -_.~...__.._-,. .-.-...-.--~---.----.--......------------"-~---.~--'"--.-.--.. ---- .-.....--. _.m..____._. r'{) ;; J0~ 6403212400 'Y~l/~ VIAS EDGARDO C&ROSAMILIA D\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 7 n/<~~ 6403230100 l1?ð KECHTER REVOCABLE TRUST 03-08-96\ :/ CHULA VISTACA91910 í ( 6403230400 / , PERIOLA IRWIN K&VICTORIA E\ . ff^()Ø , CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230700 fI/ 11 GARCIA JUVENTINO*~WJT#,FORTANEL CIND CHULA VISTA CA 91910 64032310001....rov ÖEMESA ARMANDO L&ELSæ V\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 640323 \300 v'\VURTH ROY S&MARSHALL MICHELE 1\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ¡¡6403231600 BAXTER HARRY F\ "cHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403231900 ~ It EWING PATRICIA A\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403224200 P If BA YSIC PRUDENTE F&ALEGRIA M\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 . 640323<mJO ""A+fI1Mß'rJVWd~~/ . I)J/ J MEDRANO jU:SJo!'H A&öK1\llLANU-lvffiÐ ~~ aM fJ / , - --- ~HULA VISTACA 91910 -...-----.,--.-.".--- . ......._.,_ _~.____._._._____..__~_________.____._.___~._. ___,_._..___.__n_____.__ 6403230500 URREA FRANCISCO&ESTHER\ - CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230800 CHEN WEI BIN&MAXIM SAM\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403231100 ESTEP FRED B&JANIE H\ CHuLA VISTA CA 91910 A~ 6403231400 I ~'IJ~- LIPERA DONN A&DIANE M\ , CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403231700 OCONER ROMY P\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403232000 FERNANDEZ ROLANDO J&PERSIDA F*UWJT# CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ~ '---'..M -- 6403212300 (-- ARANGURE JORGE L\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403230300 HOWE GUY E&BONNIE 1\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230600 V ARGAS MARIA D\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230900 SHIN HYUN HO\ ____._.._..____.--..___.__.__...,__..__ - - ..__._~_.___.______.__._._...__.__.._. "0 _.___ . .......__ _,.___~._._~__._____..___.__.M~._·_. - -------- -.---.-------'^--....-,.-..-.-.--- 6403230500 &~ J~ URREA FRANCISCO&ESTHERI CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230800 ~ (I' CHEN WEI BIN&MAXIM SAM\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403231100 ) ESTEP FRED B&JANlE HI ~td-f~~ CHULA VISTACA 91910 ,./6403231400 LIPERA DONN A&DIANE M\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403231700 1"\0\ OCONER ROMY PI CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403232000 T J~ FERNANDEZ ROLANDO J&PERSIDA F*UWJT# CHULA VISTA CA 91910 v6403212300~ ARANGURE JORGE L\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230300 HOWE GUY E&BONNIE J\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 6403230600 µ H .' V ARGAS MARIA D\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403230900 t' \-I- SHIN HYUN HOI -'-'--~'-----'-"-'-"~------'-'--'--'-"".'--'- _N····~ _~.__.___.____.._.._ ,. .______.__.________._____~__.__._..__.._ __ ,_ . ___'__'__"'_.0__ 787 A VENIDA SOLARIA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 640323120Ûl'" M MINTER WALTER L&VICTORIA R\ CHULA V1STACA 91910 6403231500 Jolt! YOUNGBLOOD RUSSELL V &DEBORAH A\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403231800 .......-r61Z- MOORE VANESSA 1\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 ~03232100 NORCROSS CLEMON E&DORTHY C\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ~b4Uft Ai.¡:, Z.P' ~ >..-'V1f:1':'-A , éllUCA Vt.J("/-t {>'\ ð/Hg +4f'Pï- .__^_"___,___,__~~~___,._".·.'.m.__·___·___"_·__'_·___"_.____..""_.._____~_._ . '----'-... '-~'-'-- · 787 A VENIDA SOLARIA CllliLA VISTA CA 91910 6403231200 MINTER WALTER L&VICTORIA R\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403231500 YOUNGBLOOD RUSSELL V&DEBORAH A\ CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6403231800 MOORE VANESSA 1\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 --r:':t, t7~ 6403232100 NORCROSS CLEMON E&DORTHY C\ CHULA VISTACA 91910 ______n_____.'_._m...__.___..___._____._ ..__..._..---_.~~---_.