HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1992/03/10
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
City Council Meeting
The regular meeting of the City
Council for March 10, 1992 has
been cancelled due to lack of a
quorum.
The next regular meeting of the
City Council will be held on March
17, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers.
DATED: March 10, 1992
~(l¡[ CJßIJ
Beverly 1. Authelet, City Clerk
-^ ..------.-...-".--.--.--
"I declare under penalty of perjury that I aln
em:-;!3:¡c:! b, t!:e City of Chu!a Vista in the
OHi:e cf ':f:e City Clerk and thet I posted
t:Ús P..gt::n:!t¡/Notk:o on the 1:JL'I!etin BQard at
t!:~.,ou::!ic? S rvices CuilÔins ~¡ City Hall on
Tuesday, March 10, 1992 Ui-I, E0, . ..:L SiGNED ð~'
Council Chambers
6:00 p.m. Public Services Building
Resro1ar MeetinS! of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CAll. TO ORDER
1. ROIJ. CAll.: Councilmembers Grasser Horton _, Malcolm _, Moore ~ Rindone ~ and
Mayor Nader _.
2. PLEDGE OF AIJ.EGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 28, February 18, February 25, and February 27, 1992
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: None
CONSENf CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 9)
The staff recommendJJtions regarding the following iJems listed under the Consent CaIendiu will be enaded by the
Council by one motion without discussion unless a CounciImember, a member of the pub/Ú; or City staff m¡uests
that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these iJems, pkose ftll out a "&quest to
Speak Form" available in the lobby and submiJ iJ to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recomnzendi1tion; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recomrnendiltion.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendor will be discussed after Action Items and Boards and
Commission ReaJmmendations. Items pulled by the pub/ú; will be the first iJems of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter requesting support for a Grand Jury investigation into the issue of excessive force
utilized by the law enforcement community· Wayne Holden, President, Cardiff·by·the·Sea
Town Council, P.O. Box 114, Cardiff·by·the·Sea, CA 92007.
b. Letter requesting clarification concerning the implementation of the City's mobile home rent
control ordinance· Frederick Dufresne, Otay Lakes Mobile Home Association; James R.
Quin, President, Golden State Mobilehome Owners League.
6. ORDINANCE 2497 AMENDING SECTION 2.05.010 OF THE ŒIULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE
TO ESTABUSH THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF POUΠCAPTAIN AND
ASSISTANT DIRECfOR OF BillLDING AND HOUSING IN THE
UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE OF THE CITY OF ŒIULA VISTA (second readin!!:
and adoDtion) - On 2/25/92, Council approved the movement of Police
Captain classification from the Mid·Management group to the Executive
group, subject to ordinance adoption. Additionally, Council approved
placing the position of Assistant Director of Building and Housing in the
-~ -,--._~-,_._~._..-.-.-
Agenda ·2· March 10, 1992
Unclassified Service; however, the Municipal Code was inadvertently not
amended at that time. Approval of the ordinance will place both positions
in the Unclassified Executive Service. Staff recommends Council place
ordinance on second reading and approval. (Director of Personnel)
4/5th's vote required.
7. ORDINANCE 2495 CHANGING THE ZONE a.ASSlFICATION FROM I-L-P TO C-C-P FOR THE
SOUTHERN THREE ACRES OF THE PALOMAR TROIJ.EY CENTER
PROJECf, AND MAKING FINDINGS TO PERMIT APPUCATION OF THE "P"
MODIFIER; AND CHANGING THE ZONE CLASSIFICATION FOR ZONING
CONSISTENCY SUBAREA B-3-A FROM APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL (R-3)
TO APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL WITH A P-MODIFIER., NOT MORE THAN
TWENfY-TWO UNITS PER ACRE (R-3-P-22) (second readin~ and adoption)
. The City· initiated General Plan Amendment, Montgomery Specific Plan
Amendment, and rezone for three acres located on the southerly side of
Palomar Street are required actions for implementation of an expanded
18.2 acre Palomar Trolley Center commercial project pursuant to
Council/Redevelopment Agency direction in August 1990. Staff
recommends Council place ordinance on second reading and adoption.
(Director of Planning)
8. RESOUmON 16535 INCREASING THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS' SALARIES· Charter
Section 304(c) allows for cost of living increases in an amount equal to the
increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPl). Staff recommends approval
of the resolution. (City Attorney)
9. RESOLUTION 16536 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH ERNST AND YOUNG FOR
TECHNICAL GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) CONSULTING
SERVICES TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT THE CITY-WIDE GIS CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECf - The GIS system is a multi·year CIP project
which is currently budgeted for fiscal year 91/92. As part of the first
phase, technical GIS consulting services are necessary to assist in: 1)
developing requirements definition for the GIS and database design, 2)
developing specifications for the GIS system, and 3) developing
specifications for the land base information and the digital base maps of
the City. The agreement is in the amount of $40,260. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following iJems have been advertised and/or posted as pub/Ú; hearings as required by low. If you wish to speak
to any item, please ftll out the "&quest to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submiJ iJ to the City Clerk prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff rec011l1ne1lilßtion; complete the pink form
to speak in opposiJion to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per indiviJhJßl.
10. PUBUC HEARING REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL OF UNDERGROUNDING REQUIREMENTS -
NORTH FlFI1I AVENUE FROM "e" STREET TO ROUTE 54 - STAFF
RECOMMENDS COUNCIL OPEN THE PUBUC HEARING AND CONTINlÆ
TO THE MEETING OF MARCH 24. 1992 (Director of Public Works)
-- ,..-.-..-
Agenda ·3· March 10, 1992
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter wiJhin the Council's
jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda. (StoU! law, however, generally prohibils the City Council from
taking action on any issues not included on the posted agendß.) If you wish to address the Council on such a
subject, pkose complete the yellow "&quest to Speak Undo Oral Comnwnications Form" available in the lobby
and submiJ iJ to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, pkose give your name and address
for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker.
ACTION ITEMS
The iJems listed in this section of the agendß are expected to elú:iJ substantial discussions and deliberations by the
Council, stoff, or members of the general public. The iJems will be considered individually by the Council and staff
rec01ll1llelldßtion 1IUIY in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please ftll out
a "&quest to Speak" form available in the lobby and submiJ iJ to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Pub/Ú;
comments are limiJed to five minutes.
11.A. REPORT PARKING CONCERNS FOR THE 400 BLOCK OF "L" STREET AND THE
YOlmI CENŒR PARKING LOT· On 4/17/90, Council approved
Resolution 15591 prohibiting parking on both sides of "L" Street between
Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue to allow for the addition of a two·way left
turn lane. Subsequent to the 4/17/90 meeting, staff received a request
from the homeowners to rescind Resolution 15591 and retain on·street
parking. In response to the homeowners appeal, a public heating was
conducted by the Council on 11/12/91 at which time staff was directed to
look at redesigning the Youth Center parking lot and consider access from
Fifth Avenue or limiting access from "L" Street. Staff recommends Council
accept the report and approve the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
B. RESOLlJIlON 16537 ESTABUSHING A NO PARKING ZONE ON"L" STREET BE1WEEN FOURTH
AVENUE AND FIFTH AVENUE IN THE VICINITY OF THE YOlmI CENŒR
PARKING LOT DRIVEWAY AND THE CASA VIANNEY CONDOMINIUMS
AND RESCINDING RESOLlJIlON 15591 WHICH PROHIBITED ON-STREET
PARKING FOR THE ENTIRE 400 BLOCK OF "L" STREET
12. RESOLlJIlON 16538 WWERING THE SPEED UMIT FOR THE 100 BWCK OF "E" STREET
FROM 35 MPH TO 30 MPH; AND AlmIORIZING THE INSTALLATION OF
A PAINTED TRAFFIC MEDIAN BE1WEEN SECOND AVENUE AND THE 100
BLOCK OF MINOT AVENUE . The recent resurfacing of "E" Street between
First Avenue and Third Avenue provides the opportunity to change the
roadway striping between First Avenue and Second Avenue to enhance
traffic safety in the area. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Public Works)
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Council will consider iJems which have been forwarded to them for consit1eration by one
of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees.
None submitted.
-- .--_.._._--_.~,._--_..-
Agenda ·4· March 10, 1992
ITEMS PUlJ.ED FROM TI-IE CONSENf CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss iJems whù:h have been removed from the Consent CaIendiu. Agenda
iJems pulled at the requm of the pub/ú; will be considoed prior to those pulled by CounciJmembers. Pub/Ú;
comments are limited to five minutes per individual
OTHER BUSINESS
13. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTfS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
14. MAYOR'S REPORTfS)
15. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to the Regular City Council Meeting on March 17, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers.
-~--
March 5, 1992
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: John D. Goss, City Manager ¡[G -1 f
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting of March 10, 1992
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council
meeting of Tuesday, March 10, 1992. Comments regarding the Written
Communications are as follows:
Sa. This is a letter from Wayne Holden, President of the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Town Council, requesting support for a Grand Jury investigation into the
issue of excessive force utilized by the law enforcement community, as
well as support for the adoption of State legislation providing uniform
procedures to be used regarding arrests and use of force. Both the City
Manager and the Ch ief of Police believe that po 1 ice-invo lved shoot ings
need to be thoroughly examined, but we do not support Mr. Holden's
proposa 1 s. We be 1i eve the Chu 1 a Vista Po 1 ice Department has a we 11-
deserved excellent reputation for avoiding the use of excessive force, as
most recently evidenced by the February 28-29 hostage situation at the
Readicare Center. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT MR. HOLDEN'S LETTER BE
ACKNOWLEDGED AND FILED.
5b. This is a letter from the Otay Lakes Mobile Home Association and the
Golden State Mobilehome Owners League requesting clarification concerning
the implementation of the City's mobile home rent control ordinance.
Community Development staff and the Assistant City Attorney have spoken
with Mr. Dufresne numerous times since August 2, 1991 when he and fourteen
other affected mobile home owners reached agreement in mediation, rather
than arbitration, with the park owner regarding rents and other issues for
those tenants who had been given notice of potential rent increases in the
event they sold their mobile homes and moved out of the park. None of the
other affected tenants have ~omplained about resolution of the dispute and
are in a position to enforce the agreement by having the purchaser of
their coach enter into an agreement for rent with the park owner at the
amount agreed to in the mediation, without the necessity of reopening the
arbitration. Nevertheless, staff and the Assistant City Attorney are
continuing to work with the park owner and his attorney to reduce the
mediator's decision to a form memorializing it accurately to the
satisfaction of all concerned. The agreement has been partially executed,
in that one of the tenants sold her coach and the park owner entered into
an agreement with the purchaser at the agreed upon amount.
- ..._..._"._~--_.._--_. ...----
Mr. Dufresne now believes that the affected tenants made a bad deal and he
wants to unilaterally reopen the process. Contrary to Mr. Dufresne's
assertion, the city attorney's office cannot prevent the arbitration from
going forward if it should go forward. Conversely, the city attorney's
office would sue the park owner to require arbitration in accordance with
the ord i nance, if agreement had not been reached short of arbitration.
However, such a suit appears guaranteed to fail in the courts, in light of
the dispute being resolved in mediation to the satisfaction to all but one
of the participants.
Mr. Dufresne asserts that the owners of the park are not complying with
the ordinance requirement to notify old or new residents of their right to
arbitrate rent increases. Mr. Dufresne has not complained to or requested
an investigation of such allegations by the COlIDnunity Development
Department. The Community Development Department knows that the owner and
resident manager at the Otay Lakes Mobile Home Park are aware of the
notice requirement (giving the notice as required is what initiated the
arbitration/mediation process with Mr. Dufresne's group); the resident
manager has specifically told Community Development Staff that she is
aware of and is providing the required notice; and Community Development
Staff has verified by personal observation that the notice is present in
documents presented to them by prospective purchasers/tenants when they
have come to inquire regarding the nature of the right to arbitration.
Staff has no reason to believe the ordinance is being violated at all,
much less violated in a wholesale manner.
No action appears to be required at this time AND IT I S THEREFORE
RECOMMENDED THAT MR. DUFRESNE'S LETTER BE FILED. Community Development
staff will follow up whenever investigation appears appropriate.
.
JDG:mab
trans
..
--..".--'"'.-----.----"
Minutes
March 3, 1992
Page 3
7. ORDINANCE 2495 CHANGING THE ZONE CLASSIFICATION FROM I-L-P TO C-C·P FOR THE
SOUTIiERN TI-IREE ACRES OF THE PALOMAR rn.OIJ.EY CENTER PROJECf, AND MAKING FINDINGS TO
PERMIT APPLICATION OF THE "P" MODIFIER; AND CHANGING THE ZONE a.ASSJFlCATION FOR ZONING
CONSISTENCY SUBAREA B-3-A FROM APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL (R-3) TO APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL
Willi AP-MODIFIER, NOT MORE TIlANTWEN1Y-1WO UNITS PER ACRE ("R-3-P-22") (second readinS! and
adoption) - The City-initiated General Plan Amendment, Montgomery Specific Plan Amendment, and rezone
for three acres located on the southerly side of Palomar Street are required actions for implementation of
an expanded 18.2 acre Palomar Trolley Center commercial project pursuant to Council/Redevelopment
Agency direction in August 1990. Staff recommends Council place ordinance on second reading and
adoption. (Director of Planning)
City Attorney Boogaard referred to Page 7C-5 of the Ordinance and stated that in order to accommodate the
concern that Jayken Way should not run through the entire project area, but be connected to the south side
of the entire project area, he recommended the amendment of the first full paragraph on Page 5, starting
with 'i', fifth line, 'Design, financing, and construction of the roadway facility be required to design the
improvement on the entire project in such a manner so that the roadway facility can be connected to the
south side of the entire project area without requiring the demolition of any significant structures, or any
structures with significant value......'. He had thought there was a proposal that Jaykan Way would be a
constructed roadway through the project, but Councilman Moore had corrected him and stated it was his
intent that Jayken Way be connected to the south side of the project.
Councilman Malcolm stated Council might have to use the right of eminent domain in order to put the road
through, therefore there were a number of unresolved issues. He wanted it understood that it was a study
not a comminnent at this time.
City Attorney Boogaard responded that the commitment be that the project would be designed to tolerate
a connection across the SDG&E right·of·way while the two years of 70% occupancy was occurring.
Councilman Malcolm stated he understood the motion as, staff had already looked at it, staff said we didn't
want it, Councilman Moore said he wanted to revisit it, so he thought they were looking at it again. He did
not want a project designed, improvements moved around, or the project delayed delayed unless it was
necessary.
City Attorney Boogaard felt there was a different philosophy between what Councilman Malcolm had
expressed and Councilman Moore's motion. The motion stated 'at 70% occupancy, not to exceed two years,
a study be designed on traffic circulation, and if indicated that it was necessary to allow the terminus of
Jayken Way to be connected to the south side of the project'.
Councilman Moore stated that if the developer knew that he might have to put it in, he would have to
consider design. When the zoning was changed from industrial to commercial he had made a motion to
make that one of the conditions.
Councilman Malcolm stated he did not agree, the motion was for additional study. There was nothing in
the motion to require the developer to redesign his project.
City Attorney Boogaard responded that Councilman Malcolm was correct in that regard. As a result in
drafring the language Councilman Moore proposed, it became evident that if there was to be any validity
or usefulness to doing the study and a determination at the end was made, that the City would have to
accommodate the consequences of the study.
Councilman Malcolm stated they were trying to determine if they needed something for circulation. If the
City didn't have the traffic people on board, Council should hire them or a consultant rather than taking two
years and redesigning a project on a maybe. The City should get their act together and tell the developer
whether or not he would have to do it.
Otl~f1 COP'"
-'c.~c¡
._-~-_._-_._---~-_.
Minutes
March 3, 1992
Page 4
Councilman Moore stated his previous motion could be put in the Ordinance "as is" and the developer could
do whatever he wanted to.
Councilman Malcolm responded that he understood the motion to state "further study to determine if they
wanted the road to go all the way through". Now he was saying the road was not to go all the way through.
If he were the developer, he would want the City to say what was wanted. He supported the motion for an
additional study with the expectation that the report would be back within several months so while the
developer was starting their plans the City could tell them yes or no.
Mayor Nader asked if there was a representative of the developer present.
Dave Gustafson, Assistant Director of Community Development, infonned Council that a representative was
not at the meeting.
Councilman Moore felt the change he had requested would be in favor of the developer rather than the City.
MS (Malcolm/Grasser Horton) study the issue and direct staff to return with a recommendation on the issue
(should the City require the developer to have the road system, as outlined by Councilman Moore) no later
than sixty days.
Mr. Gustafson informed Council that staff could return with a report within sixty days.
Mayor Nader stated he might have misunderstood Councilman Moore's motion. He felt the intent was that
the City would monitor the situation over a period of time or at a certain level of occupancy.
Councilman Moore responded that was the intent of his motion.
Mayor Nader questioned how that could be accomplished within sixty days.
Mr. Gustafson responded that the intent of Councilman Moore's motion could not be accomplished within
sixty days. Staff had assumed Council wanted some type of further traffic analysis.
Mayor Nader stated it was an important project and he did not want it delayed any longer. He questioned
whether the City could monitor the situation and keep options open for some later time without causing
undue delay to the project.
City Attorney Boogaard clarified that Councilman Moore had not proposed that Jayken Way run through the
project. All the developer would have to do would be to design an accommodation for a terminus for Jayken
Way to the parking lot at the south side of the project. This was much less intrusive of a condition than
previously agreed upon.
Councilman Malcolm responded that the whole center would have to be designed as if the road was going
to go through.
Mayor Nader questioned whether the applicant had been notified regarding the proposal.
City Attorney Boogaard stated it was a technical correction of the Council's prior motion and that the
ordinance should be placed on first reading rather than second reading and adoption. Councilman Moore's
motion was contained on page 7C·4, Section ll(b), the words underlined were added by the City Attorney.
Councilman Moore stated that if the study had been done right in the beginning, he would not expect any
major changes today. He withdrew his motion and stated he would vote against the project. When the
property was changed from industrial to commercial, Council came up with about five conditions. There
would be no parking or park on the SDG&E easement, the day care center might be in place but located on
the other side of a busy street and Jayken Way was not needed. Now the only thing that the City would COf}~
receive from the conditions set to enhance the community would be the widening of Palomar.
Otl~f1
ít - 10
--.---.-----.------
Minutes
March 3, 1992
Page 5
MOTION OF 3/3/92 WITIIDRAWN: (Moore) died for lack of second.
Councilman Malcolm did not feel it would be fair to state that the developer had eliminated the park. The
Ciry had removed the condition due to the questionability of safety due to the overhead power lines.
Mayor Nader stated it was his understanding that the City would also receive child care services. The land
originally designated for the park was not being developed in any way to preclude the City from establishing
a park there. He questioned whether the original language before them was what had been presented to
Council when everyone was notified that the item was on the agenda.
City Attorney Boogaard responded that all of Section II, Sub·paragraph B was not there when the item was
originally discussed. The developer was not notified regarding the change to the ordinance.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: (Nader/Moore) to stand with the original language of Councilman Moore's motion
of 3/3/92.
Mayor Nader felt that if after meeting, all parties agreed that the City Attorney's language was superior, it
would be brought back for Council consideration.
Mr. Gustafson stated he had talked with the developer after the last meeting and had been informed that
they would have no problem if, when 70% occupancy occurred it was determined that Jayken Way needed
to come through and "T" into the perimeter road at the south portion of the project and then come around
the project. They would indeed have a problem if it was necessary to divide the center with Jayken Way
going through to Palomar. The preliminary plan staff had received would not have any problem in
accommodating the petirneter road to Jayken Way.
Councilman Malcolm felt it was a win/win situation if the developer agreed to have Jayken Way T into the
petirneter road.
Councilman Moore stated his concern was that if the Center and surrounding areas were to become
successful it would result in more traffic than anticipated. This would give the City a "plug to pull" without
interfering with the development. If it did not come to pass, it would not adversely impact the project.
Mr. Gustafson informed Council that the specific language was not discussed with the developer. The
concept, if it proved necessary in the future, of "T"ing Jayken Way into the perimeter road around the center
was discussed after the meeting.
City Attorney Boogaard felt the language in the second full paragraph on Page 5 would address Councilman
Moore's motions intent and the developer's satisfaction. He recommended that the Ordinance contained in
the agenda packet be amended and placed on first reading. The word "to" at the top of Page 2 at the end,
and the words "be constructed on the" be modified to read "be connected on the south side of'.
AMENDMENf TO MOTION: (Nader/Moore) to modify the Ordinance, top of Page 2 at the end, and the
words "to be constructed on the" be modified to read "be connected on the south side of".
City Attorney Boogaard stated the super· imposed language would not make sense because it was being
super·imposed upon his language which Council was deleting by going back to Councilman Moore's original
motion.
MOTION WITIIDRAWN: (Nader/Moore)
VOTE ON AMENDMENf: approved unanimously.
ORDINANCE 2495, AS AMENDED, PLACED ON FIRST READING BY COUNCILMAN MALCOLM, reading of
the text was waived, passed and approved ~1 with Councilmember Grasser Horton absent.
O.~f1 CO,~
(c.-II
- -_._~-----,-,..__.,-_._-
Item No. /Õ
Meeting Date 3/10/92
ID. PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL OF UNDERGROUNDING
REQUIREMENTS - NORTH FIFTH AVENUE FROM "C"
STREET TO ROUTE 54
Staff recommends Council open the public hearing and continue to
the Council meeting of March 24, 1992.
tÖ-1
-.-.-.---...-....--....--..-
Minutes
.November 12, 1991
Page 8 ·
Mayor Pro Tern Moore declined and asked mat someone else volunteer and on mose occasions when that
person could not attend a function, he would try to fill in for them.
MSC (Malco1m/Moore) to appoint Councilwoman Shirley Grasser Horton to serve as liaison on the
subcommittee. Approved 4-0-1 with Mayor Nader absenL
RESOumON 16414 OFFERED BY COUNCLMAN RINDONE, reading of the text was waived, passed and
approved 4-0-1 with Mayor Nader absent
20. RESOLtmON 16415 ACCEPTING REPORT ON TIm C1Y OF 0iUlA VISTA Ul'ILI1Y
UNDERGROUND CONVERSION PROORAM (STAroS SUMMARY) AND APPROVING REVISED UST OF
PROPOSED Ul'ILI1Y UNDERGROUND CONVERSION PROJEcrs - On 9/17191, me City Council accepted
staffs report on the Utility Underground Conversion for Fifth Avenue between "L" and Naples Streets. At
the same meeting, Council directed staff to prepare a status summary report on the entire Utility
Underground Conversion Program (UUCP) and specifically address the issue of undergrounding utilities in
conjunction wim me reconstrUction of Fifth Avenue between Naples Street and Orange Avenue. Staff
recommends approval of me resolution. (Director of Public Works)
Councilman Rindone stated he would have to abstain due to a conllict of interest because of the location
of his current residence.
Mayor Pro Tern Moore said the item would be continued until 11/19191 because of a lack of quorum due ·
to the absence of Mayor Nader and Councilman Malcolm (arrived at 7:00 p.m.).
RESOLtmON 16415 OFFERED BY COUNCLMAN MALCOLM, reading of the text was waived, passed and
approved 3-~ 1-1 with Mayor Nader absent and Councilman Rindone abstaining.
21.A. REPORT ON PARKING PROHIBITION FOR THE 400 BLOCK OF"L" STREET· On 4/17/90,
the City Council approved a resolution prohibiting parking on the 400 block of "L" Street. Staff received a
letter requesting that parking not be prohibited on this block. Staff recommends City Council reaffirm their
position of 4/17190 and approve the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 4/5th's vote required.
B. RESOLtmON 16416 APPROPRIATING $2,700 FROM GENERALFiJND FOR STRIPING CHANGES
Councilwoman Grasser Horton stated that the item should be continued until 11/19191 because it required
a 4/5th's vote.
Councilman Rindone noted that several people were present who wanted to speak. Rather than have them
come back, he thought they should be allowed to speak that evening. Input could be reviewed and direction
given to staff.
Judith Sullivan, 162 Mankato St., Chula Vista, CA 91910, stated she owned property at 440 "L" St., Unit B,
Chula Vista, CA. She said none of the people living on "L" Street between 4th and 5th had requested the
parking prohibition, although staff said they had received a letter. She also said they were not notified until
the day of the vote. The Safety Commission had said that parking on one side of the street would encourage
jaywalking, but she did not think anything could be done to prevent jaywalking and that jaywalking was ·
a problem allover the City.
J I 'A -19 -
._.._---~--_..
Minutes
November 12, 1991
Page 9
Chuck Schrader 440 "L" St., Unit l, Chula Vista, CA., spoke in opposition to staff recommendation. In a copy
of minutes he had from the' Safety Commission meeting of 11/11/90, he quoted Ms. Buchan as saying "...
that parking lot is not over utilized." And, "As a matter of fact, not a lot of cars park there even when the
fields are being used." He presented Council with an article from a newspaper dated 11/6/91 which stated
that 7,000 people attended the last Chula Vista High School game and he asked Council to read the article.
He also presented Council with a letter he had received from the Chula Vista Police Department which stated
that in a 6 month period, out of 195 jaywalking citations given out, none were given out on "L" Street.
Councihuan Rindone asked if parking on one side of the street would be an acceptable compromise.
Mr. Schrader stated that parking on the north side was better than no parking at all. However, there could
be a problem with mail delivery and trash pick·up if parking was only allowed on the north side. He said
he'd want to be sure there were no parking restrictions if parking were allowed only on one side of the
street.
Councilm2: \1aJcolm stated it seemed the parking issue was being driven by the youth facility and he had
a problem ".':th letting that facility dictate. The apartments/condos were not built with todaJ's off· street
parking sta,dards so on·street parking was essential for the people living there. He suggested Council refer
the item b.'c.: to staff, directing them to negotiate with the school district to come up with an access point
at 5th Awe._e.
Carolyn Wheatley, 440 "L" Street, #M, Chula Vista, CA, spoke in opposition of stafi recommendation. She
stated that parking was needed. She presented Council with pictures showing a number of vehicles parked
on the street and in Jots.
Charles Craig, 416 "L" Street, Chula Vista, C' also representing Mrs. Lorraine Lakes, 416 1/2 "L" Street,
Chula Vista, CA, spoke in opposition of staff re,·ommendation. He stated that he and his wife run businesses
from their home. He said that when he parks his truck in the driveway, it blocks Mrs. Lakes driveway. He
pre,ented Council with a picture showing his truck parked in the driveway. He usually parb his t:-uck in
front of their house and their car on the street. If parking were prohibited, he'd have to either sell his
business or their car. He asked Council to please help them keep the standard of lÌ\ing they had when they
bought there.
Mayor Pro Tern Moore said that in looking at both sides of the street, he thought the north side would be
better to leave open. He confirmed that there was a problem with jaywalking. A painted cross walk had
been put in, but there was still a lot of jaywalking. He stated that broadening streets helped to eliminate
accidents.
Councilman Riridone said that the traffic on "L" Street moved faster and was more dangerous &tan on "F"
Street. He thought jaywalking would increase with the youth center and that the number one issue was
safety for residents and potential users. He'd support parking on both sides only if there was a fencing of
some sort, similar to what was on Beyer Blvd. across from Montgomery High School. If not, then he'd only
vote for parking on the north side. He said he was leaning toward referring the item back to staff.
Councilman Malcolm stated he was against the fencing. He thought the parking lot should be redesigned
and the present exit widened. He felt parking was needed on both sides of the street.
Hal Rosenberg, City Traffic Engineer, eXplained that to put a fence down the center of the roadway, an
island would have to be installed which would prevent left turns.
/I A - 19 L
.------.--..-:.:-.-.:.."'''''''.',.,....,..,,...-
Minutes
November 12, 1991
Page 10
)
MSC (Malcolm/Grasser Horton) to refer back to staff to worlc with the school district to redesign the parlúng
lot with access at 5th. Approved 4-0-1 with Mayor Nader absent.
Mayor Pro Tern Moore announced that when the item was again put on the agenda, the speakers would be
notified.
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
None submitted.
ITEMS PULl.ED FROM THE CONSENT CAt ""IDAR
"
None.
OTHER BUSINESS
22. C1Y MANAGER'S REPORTCS)
RESOLUTION 16417 SUPPORTING THE EXŒNSION OF PERMITS FOR THE SAN MARCOS ~
LANDFlIJ. . This resolution urges various boards to permit continued operation of the San Marcos
landfill. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (City Manager)
City Manager Goss stated a letter, signed by Councilman Leonard Moore, Councilwoman Judy McCarty from
the City of San Diego, and Jack Doyle, Mayor of Santee, was submitted to the Mayors and City
Councilmembers of all the cities in the County. They were asked to present the issues in that letter to their
respective City Councils. One of those issues was supporting the effortS to get permits for the vertical
extension of the San Marcos landfill and Resolution 16417 would accomplish that in terms of Council's
overall support.
Mayor Pro Tern Moore stated he had spoken quite strongly on that and instead of wasting time on a number
of other things that might be overtaken by events, their time and talent should go into working with the
local and State Water Quality control Boards. They have the authority to get variances to ensure that the
landfill does not close and that it continues to be expanded.
RESOLUTION 16417 OFFERED BY MAYOR PRO TEM MOORE, reading of the text was waived, passed and
approved 4-~1 with Mayor Nader absent.
City Manager Goss said there were going to be a number of meetings. Some dates had been set as to when
the item would be appearing before the local Water Quality Control Board and when it would be appearing
before the state Integrated Waste Management Board. Political presence will be requested at several of the
meetings. He stated he was satisfied that the County was expediting those meetings. The first meeting was
scheduled for December 6 and there would probably be another meeting right before Christmas. There will
be a staff member at those meetings and, hopefully, an elected member of the City Council. .
23. MAYOR'S REPORTCS) . None
JIll -~
'-':::~'.. ~'".. -
, -
&aJ.ty Commllllon Mlnutel
October 10.1891 ,
Pa". Ii
,
Mr. RI\'IfI uld that tha school uf.ty IIC'OIII too far lway from tha IntIructlon to monitor Mtclical Cent.r
.. ÐrIvI. TIlt law atat..that .chool crouwalka must bI pelntld yellow end within eoo flit of tha achool. linet
MedlClI Center Drlw Ia mort than 800 flit lwaV from the achooI. the erouwalk IIIUIt bI peInted white and.
1hamOfl.1ha achooI ufety IIC'OI could not monitor It. Mr. RIverIthan poIntId out to tha CommIulon that
1harl II I white crouwalk It In uncOhtrollld IntlraectIon on IIrotcIway In ChuIa ViltlIIId wtthIn I two yelr
period, "*' W\'Ire two fItaIItiN. .
"';'"
7. "88" en ..rklna Prðhlbltlnn fer &DO Meek ef -L- atN-'
.
Frank RmrI uld that In Jlnulry 1890. the Safety CommIuIon voted to prohibit or...~rit perldng for tha 400
block of ·L- Street.. I requirement fortha futUrl Youth Cent.r. TIlt CIty CouncU on AprIl 17, 1890 IPProwd
....oIution 15591 to prohibit perkin" on the 400 block of -L- Street. SubatQutnt to the IIIIItIng.tha striping
....d.d to provld. for I two WlY left turn Ian.. ThiI would IlIow "IV leetll for ..Itbound 1fIffIC to the
Youth Center Ind would not ClUII 1fIffic to back up on -L - S"'Nt whIIt motorIatI tried to IntIr tha youth
Cent.r. Wlltbound whic'" would bllbl. to mer". Into tha two WlV tum laM Ind Inter tha aln"l. famllv
....denc...
frink Rlwfl had rec.ntly rec.lv.d reQu,au. howaver. to IlIow for some perkin" on -L - S",..t. SlnCl Counc"
frlldV approved the plrkin" prohibition. ltaff f.1t It Mcelllry to return thil It.m to tha Slf.ty Commlllion.
tiff rec.lved a I.tter from Mr. Charles Schrader, rr..ldent of tha Cua Vlann.y Homeown.fI AaaocIatlonl
which II Ioc:ated It 440 ·L· Strllt. The request propolld perking on tha .outll ald. of -L· Strllt Ind no
perkin" on the north lide. Stiff did not Wlnt to chlnge the recomm.ndltion thlt WlI Ipproved bv the Saf.ty
Commlslion and City Council in 1990. The traffic volumes on ·L· Itrllt will continu. to lnertall and mOlt
of the ruidenU In the Irll hive IdeQuate off·ltreet plrklng. The problem with tha eall Viannev
condominiums II thlt there II no guest parkin" Ivallable.
Mr. ROllnberg said ·L· Street II a 64' wide and deslgnlt.d II a Class I collector atfIIt In the G.ntfll Plan.
ThII type of rold II In old atlndard thlt II no Ion".r applied. ItCluII -L - Street Ia .11"nattd .. a four"'nt
roadway with I left tum provision, thl only way to ICCOmplilh the provlalon II to'remove perking on both
aides. It II pollible to r.-stripe thl road with plrklng only on one ald. Ind atllI hive I left turn lant. How.ver,
I down aide of the alternative II thlt the Ian. next to the curb would be narrow Ind thare would not be a
·buff.r or ahould.r ar.. between the lidewalk and the 1fIffic lane. The llcond probl.m with the altemltlve
II that th.r. would not be anv room for blcyclisu. Th. lant adjlc.nt to Chull ViltI High School, Clrries I hl"h
numblr of bicyclilu. A third probl.m II that tha lant Idjlc.nt to tha achooI would be narrow Ind prll.ntl
. I problem for motorists .Iowlng down to tum Into the youth Qnter. The motoriat would ha\'l to atop Ind
force aU CIfI behind them to atoP. II turning right Idjacent to I curb II difficult.
ChaIr iridin IIktcIIf perkin" Wllto be tllmInIt.d on tha entire block.
Mr. Roatnbtrg uld tha plln WlI to IUmlnltt perking on the entire block. StIff receIvecI llIIIOIltIona to ke.p
tha perking In front of tha eall Vlannev condominiums. but thll wouldn't be prectlClI beCluse traffic would
lit 1fIVlm"" through I urpentlnt lliDnment on -L- StrMt. Another lltamatlve -.Id be for the property
OMlll'l to wIcItn tha road on tha aouth aide.
Chltr IrIcItn uld that I problem could occur If I truck petbd ~xt to tha narrow lane of traffic.
Mr. Rivera uld that -L - Strllt II I deslgnat.d truck routl. II II Fourth AVlnu..
Chair IIracItn uid thet to her recoU.ctlon when this laIut WII brou"ht up lilt year, no one .LlØCltd the Slf.ty
CommtuIon IIIIItIng .ven thou"h they W\'Ire notlflld.
. "" ,
. ~ . IlfI-zl
-' . .-
/x··
A ~~ - - - ----~-~._-~._---_..__.
--
.
s.ftty CommIaalon Minute.
October 10.1891 ,
. Peg. e
-
I ComrnIu/oner ChIcIutar ..ked If It would be.lller to wIeI,n -L- S1I'Ht to 1hI north, ra1hIr thin to the louth.
'-ch clrivtwly on the 10uth would hlvl to be moved beck. whlrua, the north aIcII haa f,w interruptioN .nd
.. CUI'IWI1ty uncIer conatruction. He alao ..ked If there was . 8IdeWllk eIong 1hI nonh 8Ide of "1." S1reet.
.
Mr. fliYlre IIld 1hIt there II . IId'Wllk on the nonh 1kII.
Mr. RoIenblrg IIld -L - StrNt could be wld,ned to 1hI nonh, but 1hI achooI cIIItrIct haa ......d conc,rn
ebout the .mount of pmpIrty tIIIt would be required for a wIeI,nlng. AIao, 1hI .,lItrelctiona of "1." StrHt and
Founh end fifth Avenuu would not match If the ItrHt was wldlnacI to1hl north.
ComrnIu/oner ChIcIeltlr IIld 1hIt It 434 -L - Strut. half 1hI curti" paInt8cI NIl end 1hI 0IhIr half II not and
W8rnec11O know why.
frink Rivere IIld 1h.t over numerou. Y'IfS, ItIff hi. re.pond.d to cItiz,n reQueltl to -red tip- drlveWlY. In
the .m, BeCluse 1h.se ,aaid.nCI. .re nllf 1h1 Chul. Viata High football field, VIhIcIt. would crowd
clrlYlWlYs during ,vlnts which would not allow .eeell to the ruld,ncu.
CornmIa.loner Chldllt.r slid hi. objection to re'!!ovlng 1hI parking was 1hIt. peraon IhouIcI be.IIoWld to part
. Clr In front of 1h.ir house.
\.1r. ROllnberg Slid 1hlt City ItIndard. do not glv. cr.dit for parking on the ItrHt. All new developments er.
required to provide off-¡tr..t parking sufficl.nt for occupants .nd vialtors. ,
Commla.ion.r Mltlcil slid the Youth C.nter will be used from 7:00 '.m. . ':30 p.m. .nd operet.d prlmlfily
by 1h. Chuls Vista Boys Ind Girls Club. It will .Iso be used by 1h. YMCA on weekends and II . drop-In c,nter
for youths. Th. school di.trict will .Iso b. utilizing 1h. Center.
Co-Ch.ir Thomls ask.d Mr. Rosenberg If 1h.r. would be.n ov.rflow for 1he Youth Center. Prevlou.ly.1here
were 1 10 sp.c.. .nd when the Youth Center w.s built. 36apacII Wire remov,d. He aaktd whit 1he formul.
we. for hiving 74 parking SpIC...
Mr, Rosenberg lIid he could not en.wer the Question. beCluH the Pltnnlng Department IItI the ItIndlfds.
He lI¡d he was led to believe 1h.t 1he parking WII lufficltnt for the sIz, of the flclllty.
Co-Chllr Thom.. lIid If 1he on-Itr.tt parking wes removed, ,..ltIentI on 1hI aouth 8Ide of -L - Street might
... the Youth Centar parking lot .nd crOll mid-block.
Convtrllly, Mr. Rosenberg SlId, If parking II .!low,d on the IO~ lid, of -L" Strut. UMrI of the Youth
Center might part on -L- StrNt and crou mid-block to the Youth Center. .
.
Chair IIrIden ..k,d If the youth Center would hive .YI/ItI open to 1hI public.
ComrnIu/oner MeUcll IIld It 1he current Ioya . GlrIa Club ,venti .re open to 1hI pubßc. TIlt Boys . Girl.
Club Is In negotiation¡ with the CIty'I Parkl . Recreation Department end 1hI SWHtWIlltr UnIon High School
DiItrict to clttermlne1he types of ,venti to be held .t the Center.
Mr. RoHnbergllld he undtrattnds1hlt there Is .dditionll parking on 1hI ChuII ViItI HIgh School Clmpus
which provld.. overflow plfking.
Mr. RiYlflllid there II. _II parking lot nIIr the gyrMIIium off Founh Avenue and. lot on 1hI1OUth lIde
of "K" StrHt. "'" "
or t .
r.~( ¿ - /I fI... ~
. .- - ----~-~-
.
I SIfwty Commlaalon Minutes
Oc:tobtr 10,1891 "
'.ge7
,
Comrnluloner Pius aid .n IoU lvallable on the CI/nPUI .,. full during footballs DlInN Ind with the
, conaWC1ion of the Youth Canter, 36 lpaCU Wire IoIt, HI QUlItIonIcI where motOriItI would park If In lvant
II going on It. ~ Youth CIntIt end .. the mdium,
Mr, RIvIra aid motoriIta would lit parIdna on the per'.meter of thelChoollncluclinG fifth AVInUI, -K" Stree"
end 1IdI1trHU. .
." t:Aa".. .,.IIrat/",. ~II" -L· .."..,.1. eAuI. VI.,.. l:A .'.ff ,
Mr. SctvIcIIr responded to the ItItement ""de flglrdlngldlqum notice by .tIotll.o thIi nodcu for Council
IIIIItinoI Ife ""lied on Thuraclly for TUllClly 1nHtinga. Ita I ruuIt. cItIønI ncelve notice for Council
IIIHtinga on the day of the mlltlng.
Mr. ISctI/'IdIr Ixplllned thlt the prevloUI Bolrd of DirecIora of the Cau YIInney Homeowners AlloCiItion did
not flel they could do Inythlng .bout thl flmovll of plrklng on "L" Streit. When hi became ""Iident of the '
Bolrd of Directors. he Immediltely begin looking Into the altultion. Mr. SchrIder _ told by Frank Riverl
1hIt thlltlndlrd for I two-WIY left turn line II 10'. TraffIC Englllltrlng llwaVl rtCOIMItnds the widest
polllble lines emf the widest line Is 12'. HI Ilid with four lines It 12' Ind I turn line It 10', It Itill doeln't
.Idd up to 64'. He brought this Item to the City CouncU .nd _ told thlt on thl "W StrHt bridge the lines
Ire 9' wide. Ind If then IInls Ire 9' wide, then ""king llnel on "L" Street 1" lnIteed of '2' Ihould not be
, problem. He slid thlt two lines could be , " wide Ind two lines' 2' Ind this would ItII/ IlIow for .dequlte
Iplce for on-street Plrklng. Mr. Schrlder Ilid thlt when there II I footblll glme .. the high moo!, plrklng
lots Ire fun .. Ire the surrounding Itr..ts, Ind clrs hive been tOWld from thl Casa VÎlnney complex during
. football games. He said this situltion will only oet worse Ind Isked thlt the CommIssion IlIow plrklng on the
10uth Ilde of the .treet .0 their gUilts Cln have. pllce to Plrk. Mr, Schrader aid thlt ""ny homeowner.
carne to the City Council meeting on October " 1991. Then homeowner. have one car plrked In their
driveway .nd one on the street. If parking is removed, thI.e homeowner. will have to park Ifound the block
from their homes.
t:.mlvrt Wh..tJøv. UD -L· Sir.., .M. Chul. VI.'.. l:A .,gr,
Ms. Wheltley pointed out thlt "L" Street will have to be rt-strlped whtthIr parking islllmllllted or not. The
ouest plrklngls needed, otherwlle. CaSI VÎlnney guesu ""y have to park In thI Youth Canter, Thase guests
would then crOll mid-block causing I lilbility to the City. She is opposed to cIo.lng thI parking on the aouth
lide of "L" Street.
ChaIr Inden aked Mr, Ronnberg hie opinion of narrowing thlllna to allow parking on one lide.
Mr. RoItnbtro give thÎ dimenslonl of the atrtlt If parking were llIowed. On the aouth IlcIe, there would be
the I' parking line. the next line 12', the next "', the canter 11ft turn line would be 1 0', the next line' l'
then the line Igllnst the north licit' 2'. Mr. Ronnbero aid hi doel IIC!t rICOrnrntnd . 12' line next to I
alcltwalk becausa there would not be I buHer between pedeatrllna end vehicles. ThIs ItripIng is currently on
-P Streit between third Ind Fourth Avenuel.
~Ir Thoma aked If there Wire Idcrltionel flQuIIlßlllltI aIncI this.. I truck routt. .
Mr. RivIrI aid that lUff doll not ItcOI11IMnd lilY line.... thin '2' In width for trucka,
Mr. Rotenberg aid there Ire'" llnel In the City and cited -E" StrIIt under 1-105 a In PImple. He is
unaware of .ny location In the City thlt hal 9' IInll.
II,. eA.".. S~",.d.,. 44D -L- .".., .1. CI"JI. VI.,.. t:A .'!J"
Mr. Schrader lIid hi hal been Dvlng on "L" Streit for Ii ( years Ind his ntVII' "1OWn IIrgI truekI to park on
"L" Streit. He aId trucks travel the ~ut4c1o not park. .
- --t. .
.... ..
II A -)..3
"to.
.'~" '" ...
- . -. ..._.__.~_~.___.~-'--._n_
.
.
,
. 8efetv Commiallon Minutel
.
. , October '0, 1991 ;
. 'Ig. 8
;
II,. II.",., S.lf1bUI'V. un -L· ."..t .A. Chili. "VI.tr.. t:A .f."
, Mr. Stlilbury QUUtionId whV I 11ft tµm line was nøcled, when nwlling ..It the only 11ft turn thet could
.be_cSt wal to tµm Into the Vouth Center. TrawllingWllt. then.,. no IIuIInuHI end a 11ft turn IIn. Is
not n.Q....ry, Mr. Slb.bury ..1cI1hat the CommIaaIon WII not cII.ClII.lngthe factor of not htvlng1M 11ft
turn lint,
Co-ChIlr 1bomu uld If the CommIaaion anowad partdng on the IOUIh aIeIe of -L- SVttt. It wouIcIencourag.
. IIIIcJ.blDck croa..lnll and jlywalklnll Into the Youth Center.
MSe rThomIIlMatadal to 8Pprove 8tIff'e raDDmmendttlon MIl prohibit on....dt ~" on the 400 block
of -L- 'traIt. Approved I·' with Commllllonll' ChId....r voting no,
Mr. Rlwra told the audltncethet thIIltem wID be tII'ItatIwly tcheduled for MCond CIty CouncIl "".tlng In
NOYIrnbtr. Only the City CouncIl can rawr.e their decision of 1890. Mr. Riwra will notify the audience. (
Chair BrlcStn told the ludienc.thet th.V can Ippaa' to 1M City Council. The Slfety Commlaalon racommend.
.ctions, but It Is Council thlt IIU policv.
M,. t:h.".. Seh,.dtlf. UD -L· Sir.", MI. Chuf. Vi.'.. CA .,g"
/tr. Schl'lder liked the Commission whV thev voted to .limilllte plrtdng. -
Chair BrlcStn uld It was I matter of IIfetV.
Co-CtIIlr Thomas lIid his vote WII PlrtlV blsed on the mid·block crossIng of Pldemln..
Mr, Schrader IIld thlt bv the Commillion'. racommendltion, they would be meklng Cell Vilnnev gutlu wllk
ICI'OII -L - Strllt or IIv.rl' blocks. Most the resldenult Cell Vilnnev Ire IInlor citizens II Ire their gueltS.
Co-Chalr Thomas liked Mr. Schrlder If there was gUilt partdng In the Cell VilMlV complex.
Mr, Schrader uld th.V do not hive gutlt plrklng, Ind he discovered 1Mt It would COlt .5,000 to put In two
partdnglPlctl. The Cell Vilnnev complex WII built In 1877 before th.re was I minimum partdng spice
raquirement. Ce.1 Vlann.v hel 1.8 plrking SPICtl per unit which 11 lltilflctOry for raald.nu, but not gutlu.
Chair Bred.n told Mr. Schrader that he htd us.d hla Illotted time to IpeIk to the CommlaaJon. She' then
nlnforced thet the Commilllon'a Job was to .velUStl altultiona on ufetV and advilld Mr. Schrader to go to
CouncIl,
.
I, Orll CommunicatIon. None.
I. Fa.1d TrIð Ruaa.ntðftl
Mr. RiVlfl live the achedule of the School Safety TIsk Foret which .veluat1s the School SIfetv Pltrol. If
the CommIIIlonerl Ira Intereatld In IttInding this Tllk Foree, the.v ahould contact ItIff Ind Irrlngemenu can
be _de to 90 with the Police Department .nd Englllllrlnll ltaff on .n evelustlon. Another IUII"ewon would
be for the Commillloner. to 00 with ltaff on I lpeed aurvev. Thla would entlll IIttin"lPI.d counter., uslnll
tICIlr OUIII, and poallblv Ullno the Police Dlplrtment Smert unit.
The CommIIIIon ."reed that thII would be their field trip and let Slturdav, November ,e, '891 u the dati
from 8:00 l.m."12:oo p.m. . ,.~, ~
. " .
~ IlfI-~¥
;/.
~ ./ -~ ~ .. . .
....--...........
:
. ,
.
. .
amMES 06- AprI!17,l990 . '.
.
I
( .
Cr-...·" Malcolm ltated dlat IrNdwarlqW1iellbollld 84m.. "'" 1IM7 did DOt keep dadr cd of Ibe ..
hrlaIII when Ibe æy did. He would like 1D bavea ~ aplafDin¡ .ylbC)' did DOt put tra wbatnv Ibe)'
..d ClllllZÚtttd 1D IDCI "'" <>-t-"" IbouId ..-male lbelr ~...lo,IOIII.
~ Mc"'-.nw .......... r m durfzta" pu1IUc IIeartDp ... IDGIoE d&bt4foWlJllnd
.... .... lor dUll up.
...,. Co cIIritied 11M &cr dlat 11M weprar 11M IDGU ..1ID1IIt lIad aoclleeD ~dtcllNt dIat Ibere
... alptdlI 1tIId)' IIefzI¡ ~vcted wiIb Ibe fKI -tDdadom... tra çp.l..4..ately 1. -..... He
JDIonDed lb. CoIIndllbat Ibe app1iclllt would" 0IIt If IiDWD IIIIdI 511I9O .. would .. lIIIIftIIabl. for .
.... SI1I9O 1DHtiD¡.
.
1ISC~).rl~ ....-JIdor.~. . -.... JM" Jœ1D.... v- I . If snm. .
~I"'_...d s.G-2 wJda C---"-_......... MoanINader .~-.
MSC (CozlMcCaDdlia) . -=ve .... 2Qo\.. Jœ ..... __--'II r I . If IfI.1IQ. o\-,.....d s.G-2
wIIb CDuD""-Mn Moort/NIdc .t..-.
21. JlUBUCH£ARING ~'nON or PR.OHIBmON or 0N-S'1'REET PAJUaNG POll '!HE
400 )I NY OF ". I"IREET " '!be Swlttwlter UDlon Hi¡h School DiIuict and 1bea.dlYlloplllW A;tnC)'
an pnpo.lnr to blll1d 117,000 14. fL Youlb CeDter mld·block 011 ". Street between'ourth Awnve Ind
,iIth Avtnve In lb. Chul. VISta Hi¡h Schoo! property. Ita!' rw---Aolbat Coundl: 1. e.ldvct 1 pvblic
1Iaarin¡: 2. adopt 1 ....olvtion prohibltin. on-atreet parkin. for lb. 400 block or "" Street; and 3.
( appropriate 12.700 fromlbe Genera! 'lUId for lb. nquired Itripfn¡ and sI¡n cbanJe.. CÞJnctor or Pvblic
Works)
RESOLUTION 15591 APPIlOW¡G PR.OHIBmON or 'AJUaNG POJltHE 4:)0 JI ncr OF ""
mEET AND APPROPIUA11NG $2,700 PJlOM '!HE UNAPPaoPlUA1ED ŒNERAL PUNDS IALANCE
'Ibis kinrlbe time and plac. II Iclftniled, Ibe public baarIDa ... dedan4 opeD.
Hal Rosenber¡, TrafFic En¡lneer. ltated dlat durin¡ Ibe Safety c--1"ñon IIurfD¡ Iben... DO opposition
1D Ibe parkin¡ prohibition. '!be IMIJhborbood ... DOtified or Ibe pIII"I'!I putizI& prohibition.
1bere IIeina DO pIIbllc cutimOJl)', .... public IIearIn& ... dedan4 doHd.
DSOl'mON 15591 OPJIERED BY CXXJNœMAN MAt 1'OtM. ........, If... 1IIt_.......-s and
~w.-,'" s.G-2 wIda c-'--"_._~ ..~ .,-"-. .
cttyMulqer Goa DOted dlat 11M refll'lDCl1D ~ IfAm4s" W IIeeD .11...... "'1IN!ution.
22- JlUBUC: H!ARING ICh 90 m. ~'nON ar '!HE CHJLA ¥IStA GRDWIH
MANAGEhŒm' ., ~~,~ AMEHDMEN1' 10 tHE ŒNERAL IUN . an JNmA1ID.1IM Growth
Mulqement lIement It 'an I If an ....u GrvwIh IiIanapIIIeDt fftpIm ..eð 1D r ,1-t a
amprehenslw Public facilities 'baaIII¡ aDd ,..-....., ~ lea!' n I 40 ....I"'..~ of Ibe
ftI01l1don. CÞJnctor of P1anDln¡) .
JESOumON 15592 RPIlOYlNG 1'Cf.90ff1 IPPIDYING 1HZ GR.DW1'H MANAGEMENT
( m ftInll',loN AMENDMENT 10 tHE GENERAL PLAN
1bis IlåD¡Ibe 1be aDd ptace II ..._1544; 11M p\I1I1Ic 1IIarfD¡...1Iedand open.
. -; .
I
- .., .
;{, , /IA -25
/. ,.,.
-,..
. .
. .
SAFETY eOMMiSSION MT~S - R- :l'anuBrv 11. 1990
.
Commissioner Braden a.ked what were the number of
( parking apace. that would be lost. "
Mr. Riv.ra not.eS that probably six to ei;ht parking
., apace. would be lo.t.
lI.bran S.pahri stat.d that b.for. staff 90.. to City
Council th.y will notify the bu. in..... of this ar.a to
l.t th_ know what we are doing.
COlllJllissioner leeester atated that this ai;ht bave an
impact on what we ai;ht want to d.cide d.p.nding upon
what they bave to aay.
The Chair r.quest.d any oth.r comment.. c
MOTION:
MSC (Waller/Braden) 5-1 in favor (Arnold again.t).
COlllJllissioner Braden r.que.t.d that her approval of the
Minut.s of the last a.eting.
Chair so noted. Th. approval of the Minut.s of the
last meeting be changed to 5-0 (Braden' al.o approved)
with 1 abst.ntion (Waller).
( ill. Pro~oaed vou~h eênter in ~hê .00 block of "L" Rtr@et
Chair asked for staff's r.port.
Frank Rivera stated that Pam Buchan, from the COlllJllunity
Development Department, was in the audience and
available to answer any qu.stions the COlllJllission aay
have on the youth center.
There is a youth center that is proposed to be built on
the Chula Vista High School area ait. and it will be a
14,000 square foot center on .th. north aieSe of "L"
Str..t, aid-bloCk b.tw.en Fifth Av.nue aneS Fourth
Avenue. Volume. on "L" Str.et ar. exp.cted to increase
b.cau.e of . the youth c.nter as well as other
d.velopments in the East.rn part of the City of Chula
Vi8ta. Staff bas looked at the eccieS.nt. that bave
occurreeS in this block and have d.t.rmined that aany of
the accident. which occurred couleS have b.n prohibited
by the installation of a two-way turn pock.t on the
center,of "L" Str..t. Frank Riv.ra, u.ing vi.wgraphs,
showed the COlllJlliss1on the youth center aite. The
existing driv.way locat.d on "L" Str.et just east of
Fifth Av.nu. will. be closed aneS relocated on Fifth
Avenue just north of "L" Street. The addition of a
two-way turn lane into the youth center on "L" Street
e- will nec..sitat. the prohibition of str.et parking and
at this time aC?,¡ ~f the vehicles which do park on "L"
. .
. . .
.; ;
- ~, ; ¡If¡ -~
i~- :." :
, ,
-0"-',"'''','''''''''-' ..,".,,!,.,.,....,"!..'"""""""~,....:.,'''''-..,.
I
.
.
.
, ,
SA~TY COMMISSYON ~NUT~S - 0- 3aftUBrv 1~. 1990
.
Street are parking along Üe aouth aide, Üere are
t several apartment cOlllplexes, aingle ~amily dWellinqs
and a private school located on üe aouth aide of "L"
Street.Some of Üese building. ~oward Üe we.t end of
üe street do have large parking lots, ~oward the e..t
.. and many ju.t have double dri~eway.. In üe interest
of public aafety and in view of üe propo.ed youth
center development staff j.s :recommending 'that 1:I1e
Safety COlllllli..ion recommend prohibiting atreet parking
along both aid.s of üe 400 block of "L" street.
Chair ..ked for question. of ataff.
COllllllis.ioner Arnold ..ked if the ~ire hydrant located
at üe northeast corner of Fifth Avenue and "L" Street "
would have to be lIIoved.
Mr. Rivera stated üat it would not have to be lIIoved.
The driveway could be lIIoved further to 1:I1e north.
COllllllissioner Arnold asked if the ainqle falllily hOllies
and apartment. have off-street parking.
Mr. Rivera responded that 1:I1e single falllily dwellings
have driveways, thouqh 1:I1ere Üere are some parcels
that have lIIore 1:I1an one house on them and so parking
( for them, at tillles, can be quite difficult--they would
have three to four cars in one driveway and some of
. them do utilize the on-street parking. Most of 1:I1em do
not and on occasion üere has probably been about seven
or eight cars parked at night. . Most of .1:I1e people do
park off-street.
COllllllissioner Braden .sked if 1:I1e parking on both sides
of the street would need to be eliminated.
Mr. Rivera stated üat it would be for both sides
because 1:I1e two-way turn pocket is propo.ed to be 10 to
12 feet wide and üat we would have to take 1:I1e parking
off on both side. to .ccollllllodate Üe number of ~rucks
1:I1at u.e 1:I1at street .s it is . designated truck route
and we do have . lot of traffic on 'that atreet.
COllllllissioner Braden ..ked if the re.idents along that
area been notified.
Mr. Riyera atated üat ataff notified averybody--the
Chula Vista School District, all resident. .long 1:I1e
aouth aide and averybody on all four aide. of the
inter.ections. .
COllllllissioner Arnold a.ked if anyone wa. here.
( "" .
; . l/fJ - 21
.
...
r '~" __".__.u
"-.. ....
.".",._._~
.
. ,
'. .
.A~TY COMMYSSION MYNUTES - 10- ~anu8rv 11. 1090 ·
·
( Chairman Decker stated that no one rrom the public was
at thi. .eeting. .-
Commisdon.r Amo1d a.k.d Who would be operating th.
youth c.nt.r.
..
Pam Buchan r.·.ponded that at th. pr...nt, th. plan is
that th. Chu1a Vi.ta High School Di.trict will utilize
part of 1:.h. racility during the day and during the
summer.· ~h. City will .ith.r participat. in op.rating
so.. activiti.. and g.t a 1..... for oth.r tJa.. .owe
can get ru1l utilization of 1:.h. building, or it will
ju.t be 1:.h. City and 1:.h. School District with no
1...... As far a. op.ration, 'th. answ.r to your
qu.stion i. .o.t likely 1:.h. City and 'th. School
Di.trict and pos.ib1y a 1..... a. w.11.
It was aSkeeS if the activiti.. of 1:.he youth center
wouleS be clo.ed if and when th. high school has
activities on the fields.
Ms. Buchan .tated that .taff has not .ade that
provision. She further .tateeS that sh. would not
.nvision that would b. the case" .
Commissioner Braden .tated there wa. a lot of activity
( on that field"
Commissioner Arnold, was concern.d about 1:.he pr.sent
·
off-str.et parking lot.
Ms. Buchan .tated that when .he has att.ndeeS functions
at the field that the parkin; lot 1:.hat is there now
where the ~outh center parkin; lot will b. 10cateeS and
the facH ty itself, that parking lot i. not over
utilized. A. a .atter of fact, not a lot of car. park
. there .ven when the fieleSs ar. being u..d. Everybody
s.ems to park along ·X" Str..t. ~at is full of
parking.
Commissioner &moleS stat.d he is conc.rneeS primarily
with night aneS/or aft.rnoon activiti.. in the stadium,
a. 1:.hat parking ar.a i. heavily u..d Wh.n they are
having gam.. or activiti.. at 1:.h. staeSium, track, and
so rorth. He wi.hed to know if 1:.he parking racilitie.
of 1:.he LOUth c.nt.r when 'ther. is h.avy traffic being
parked, n that ar.a.
Chairman Decker wi.hed to know what will be 1:.he hour.
of operation for th~ youth c.nt.r.
(
.ø':'" ..
., .
. 11.f/ -ED
..Þ
~. .
,. ..-
~ ~...-
- - -- .-.."".,-.,..,..--
.
. - .
. .
SA~TY COMMISSION MINUTES . - 11- 3anuarv 1!. 199D .
.
( Ms. Buchan re.ponded that 1:hia haa 1tot been decided
. until ataff has actually determined what 1:he programs
are 90ing to be. She atated that 'thb b aOllething
,. that certainly ahoulcS be taken into consicSeration,
particularly when a rootball 9ame ia 90in; on, a. ahe
could aee the parkin; lot being over utilized. %t
could be 'that when a . rootball 9&11e is 90inv on that the
youth center woulcS ftot be operating tully because the
youth. woulcS be at the rootball 9&11e. !'hat b ftot ,
90in; to be all1:he ·oa.e., but 1:hat certainly i.
something ror ataff to take into con.ideration when we
prepare the activity li.t and acheduling. We will be
doing that in conjUftction with the School Di.trict so
we will have all the achedule. available. She believe. <"
the School Diatrict will be aensitive to that very
que.tion.
Commiadoner Braden a.ked what ia the timing for all
thi. construction.
Ms. Buchan stated it would commence aa quickly a. we
can do it. Accordin; to the tentative schedule, the
start of construction ahould be;in in aarly 1991, and
it could be moved forward, Completion is axpected to
be within .even to ei;ht month. after start of
( construction, At this point ataff i. still in final
desi;n development. It i. not po.sible to be preci.e
about the achedule when ataff is still working with
construction drawin;s: however, Ma. Buchan'. best
estimate is that it would be aroUftd the first part of
1991.
Commiasioner Braden asked when 18 it planned to
eliminate the parkin;. If the con.truction i. not due
to start; for nearly a year, when doe. staff plan to .,
. prohibit the parkin; and why is it being done ftow. Is ,
thi. not premature?
Frank Riverà re.ponded, atatin; that thi. item has to
be brou;ht before the City Council and, in addition,
the mo.t efficient 'way to remove the parkin; is 90ing
to be to chan;e the strip in; and we wOulcS prefer to do'
it in the summer when there i. a chip sealing rro;ram
in effect and we can chip over the old striping nstead
of sandblasting and paint it at that time. So we would
be 100k,1n; at removin; the parkin; aometime in the late .
aummer at the earlie.t.
, Commi..ioner Braden inquired about how many layer. of
chip aeal cSo you put on before you finally quit. She
stated that cro.sin; some street. i. ju.t about bottoms
( out one's car.
,~" .
. " .
" IIA -~I
."Þ
/',
.,.,~ - w,_· "~;'.~:':';'_f
MAl LING LIST FOR "l" STREET
LABELS ON 4914E
Robert Acuna RES IDENT
Principal Chula Vista High School 448-B "L" Street
820 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91911
Chu.l a Vi sta, CA 91911
RESIDENT
Thomas Sil va 454 "L" Street
Director of Planning Chula Vista, CA 91911
Administration Center
1130 Fifth Avenue RESIDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 456 "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
904 Fourth Avenue RES IDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 458 "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
410 "L" Street RES IDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 460 "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
416 "L" Street RES IDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 464 "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
416-1/2 "L" Street RES IDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 468 "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
422 "L" Street RES IDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 470 "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
426 "L" Street RES IDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 482 "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
428 "L" Street RES IDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 490 "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RESIDENT
430 "L" Street RES IDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 448 "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RESIDENT
440-M "L" Street RES IDENT
Chula Vista, CA 91911 440-M "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
448-A "L" Street RES IDENT
Chula Vi sta, CA 91911 440-N "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
WPC 4915E
II fJ -.3Z
-"---...--- _....___...u n_ ______._._._____.__.._.._.__..........__
MAILING LIST FOR "L" STREET
LABELS ON 4914E
RES IDENT RES IDE NT
440-0 "L" Street 440-L "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911 Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
440-P "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
440-Q "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Casa Vianney Homeowners Association
440-Y "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
440-A "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
440-B "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RESIDENT
440-C "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RESIDENT
440-D "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
440-E "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
440-F "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
440-G "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RESIDENT
440-H "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RES IDENT
440-K "L" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
WPC 4915E
II A -33
,---------..__.--,- -- .--.-..-.---.-..-..-... ....._~_.-