HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1984/04/19
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
r OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Thursday, April 19, 1984 Council Conference Room
4:12 p.m. City Hall
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT Chairman Cox; Members Moore, Scott, Malcolm
MEMBERS EXCUSED Member McCand1iss
STAFF PRESHJT Executive Director Goss, Commun i ty Development
Director Desrochers, Agency Counsel Gill, Special
Counsel Reed, Redevelopment Coordinator Zeg1 er,
Public Information Coordinator Cox
ALSO PRESENT Jeff Ki nsell. Jeff Phair, Paul Thoryk, Rev. Jim
Goins
ITEM NO.1 - FINANCING ALTERNATIVES - BAYFRONT/TOWN CENTRE
The Redevelopment Aency is now in a position to consider funding to implement
the Bayfront Redevelopment Project. There are several financing alternatives
to raise needed funds. At the last meeting the Agency was provided with a
computer printout of several methods of financing prepared by Agency financial
consultant and bond underwriter, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
Community Development Director Desrochers discussed redevelopment funds needed
as a resul t of the Coastal Commission approval of our Land Use Plan.
Approximately $11 million, which includes $6-$7 million infrastructure costs,
will be necessary in the next three years. And if the Bayfront Trolley
Station is approved, another $1.5 million will be needed. Because of the
greater f1 exibil ity allowed by short-term notes, ~Ihich also provide for an
escrowing of funds relative to the business inventory tax question, they Ire
recommended for the Agency.
Mr. Jeff Kinsell, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. , 505 Lomas Santa Fe
Drive, Sui te 100, Sol ana Beach, CA 92075, discussed the business inventory
subventions based on 1983-84 tax increment revenues.
MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT
MSUC (Malcolm/Cox) to accept the report.
Community Development Director Desrochers indicated that documents relative to
sizing the issue will be prepared and report brought back to the Agency prior
to a sale.
-.......--...- ---. -"---"---~'-'-~--------'-"--'~-"'-'---"'-'
Adjourned Regular
Redevelopment Agency Meeting - 2 - April 19, 1984
Special Counsel Reed remarked that the Superior Court issued a judgment
val i dating the Agency's ri gh t to issue tax increment bonds and/or notes;
therefore, the Agency Executive Secretary lost.
ITEM NO. 2 - REPORT: TOWN CENTRE FOCUS AREA PARCEL 8 (RESIDENTIAL PARCEL)
Since Mr. Zo gob, developer for this site, and his legal counsel, were in
attendance at the Desi gn Review Committee meeting at this time on another
matter, this item was continued.
MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM
MSUC (Malcolm/Cox) to postpone this item to the next meeting.
ITEM NO. 3* - REPORT: SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY CHAPEL - LAND USE PERMIT
A land use permit to locate a church in an existing building at 310 Park Way
has been requested by Rev. Jim Goins of the South Bay Community Chape1. The
Town Centre Redevelopment Plan authorizes the Agency to permit establishment
of unclassified uses such as a church with in the project area. The Town
Centre Project Area Committee recommends approval for the 14-month interim use
period.
Discussion foll owed involving the avail abil i ty of parking for this use.
Al thou gh church members meet on Sunday mornings and Tuesday evenings, the
congregation is not anticipated to increase above 120 members within the next
year. Currently, there are 14 off-street park ing spaces adjacent to the
building and 28 additional off-street spaces, which will become available when
the Sweetwater Authority relocates. Additional parking can be handled by the
Parking Structure.
Community development Director Desrochers stated that the Planning Department
rendered their approval of the project since there were no environmental or
parking problems.
Member Moore questioned the appropriateness of approving this request without
the Parking Place Commission's review.
(Member Malcolm left at this time, 4:22 p.m.)
MOTION TO REFER TO PARKING PLACE COMMISSION AND DOWNTOWN COMMITTEE
MSUC (Moore/Scott) to refer this request to the Parking Place Commission and
Downtown Committee for review.
*Please see Page 6 for continued discussion on this item.
_n"_ ~. _.--._._._-_..__._-----_...~.--_. --
Adjourned Regular
Redevelopment Agency Meeting - 3 - April 19, 1984
ITEM NO. 4 - REPORT: SIDEWALK CAFE POLICY - ANNUAL REVIEW
According to the Sidewalk Cafe Policy, all sidewalk cafe permits in Subarea 1
and the pol icy itself must be revi ewed annually by the Redevelopment Agency
for a recommendation to alter or continue the permit and/or pol icy.
Currently, the only restaurant with a sidewalk cafe is the Munchner Kind'l
Restaurant located at Third Avenue and Center Street. This cafe has been in
business since May 1983 and the lease renewal is due in May 1984.
Staff recommends that the Agency approve the continuation of the existing
sidewalk cafe policy and fee structure.
MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to accept the report.
ITEM NO.5 - REPORT: TOWN CENTRE CLOCK CARILLON
The Town Centre clock carillon is now operati onal and wi 11 begi n pl ayi ng at
the clock dedication ceremony on April 28. A 1 isting of optional chime and
melody patterns, along with proposed hours of operation, are being submitted
for Agency review. Staff recommends that the Agency approve the chimes on the
hour and ha1 f hour between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. wi th a melody to follow the
noontime and 5 p.m. chimes.
(Member Malcolm returned, 4:26 p.m.)
MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT
MSUC (Moore/Scott) to accept the report and staff recommendation.
Chairman Cox discussed the listing of names on the clock's dedication plaque.
He suggested the th ree boards/committee responsible for the downtown
activities shoul d be 1 i sted under their respective board/committee. In
addition, the Chairman proposed that Mr. Daniel Pass, Town Pl anner for th e
area, should be included for recognition because of his valuable contributions
to the project.
MOTION TO ADOPT PROPOSED DEDICATION LIST
MSUC (Cox/Scott) adopt the proposed dedication 1 ist for the Town Centre clock
plaque (recognizing three major boards and their members, including the Town
P1 anner).
Chairman Cox requested an update on the grand opening activities ceremony for
the Town Centre Focus Area. In response, Public Information Coordinator Cox
highl ighted pl anned activities, incl udi ng: a four-page newspaper insert,
"before and after" pictures of the area; reception immediately following the
clock dedication on 4/28; entertainment by Music Machine; groundbreaking for
Sea food Broil er Restaurant; Jack LaLanne's grand opening; recognition of
"Asian-Pacific Week" with related entertainment.
-- - ----~_.._-_._--_.~-
Adjourned Regular
Redevelopment Agency Meeting - 4 - April 19, 1984
ITEM NO.6 - Port Commissioner's Quarterly Report
Due to the Port Commissioner's absence, no quarterly report was given.
ITEM NO. 7 - REPORT: ROHR REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY SPACE
Rohr Indus tri es proposes to increase the number of temporary offi ce coaches
located on the east side of Tidelands Avenue between "G" and "H" Streets. The
San Diego Unified Port District will be responsible for land use approval and
development in this area; however, the City will process the required building
permit.
MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT
MSUC (Moore/Malcolm) to accept the report.
ITEM NO. 8 - REPORT: DEVELOPMENT OF PARCEL 3
Responses to a Request for Propos a 1 s and advertisements were soli ci ted from
the real estate development community for the Agency-owned parcel at Bay
Boul evard and "F" Street. The parcel was appraised at a fair market value of
$325,000. On April 5, 1984, staff recommended the Agency approve the
selection of Bay Boulevard, Ltd. However, at that time members requested more
information regarding all of the proposals.
Community Development Director Desrochers reported because of new information
received, staff does not maintain its previous recommendation. Instead, the
Agency is recommended to authorize staff to enter into an Exclusive
Negotiation Agreement with Paul Thoryk, AlA.
Mr. Desrochers indicated that representatives from Bay Blvd., Ltd. and Paul
Thoryk & Associates were available this afternoon to make presentations.
Mr. Jeff Phair, Bay Blvd., Ltd., 3110 Camino del Rio South, Suite 100, San
Diego, 92108, congratulated the Agency and staff for their recent victory with
the Coastal Commission. He urged the Agency to rev i ew all proposals based on
their consideration of the developer's willingness to financial commitment, as
well as their commi tment to quality development. Bay Blvd. , Ltd. has an
excell ent track record for provi ding qual ity development. Although the City
is anxious to proceed with development of this parcel due to their recent
Coastal Commission approval, Mr. Phair suggested "patience" shoul d not
override "prudence. " The sUbject parcel is a key parcel on the bay front ,
therefore, development should not be rushed.
In answer to Member Scott's question, Mr. Phair indicated the developer will
bui1d-to-suit and will hire a restaurant operator. A major operator will not
be selected, however, until a development agreement is entered into between
Bay Blvd., Ltd. and the Agency.
. . ""___m.'_____ __.______......_. _.-.._.'.__ - --._-------,,--------
Adjourned Regular
Redevelopment Agency Meeting - 5 - April 19, 1984
Discussion involved the Agency's review rights once the development agreement
is signed. Special Counsel Reed noted that the understanding of Bay Blvd.,
Ltd. is duri ng the negoti ati on peri od if they do not purchase the property,
they have the ri ght to resubmi t a proposal a fter the property has been
readvertised.
Mr. Phair interjected that after discussing this matter with staff, Bay Blvd.,
Ltd. agreed to delete this statement from their proposal.
A brief recess was taken at this time, 4:59 p.m.
The meeting reconvened at 5:05 p.m.
Mr. Paul Thoryk, representing Paul Thoryk & Associates, Inc., 1157 Columbia
Street, San Diego, 92101, narrated a slide presentation depicting his previous
developments nation-wide, including: people-oriented town structures,
industrial projects, and prefabricated and spec. houses. In answer to Member
Scott's earlier comment, Mr. Thoryk responded that he does not intend to copy
E1 Tori to Restaurant's menu, rather he intends to bring a unique-type
"white-tablecloth" dinnerhouse to the site.
In the absence of the other two developers who submitted proposals (Appel
Development and Saga Corporati on), Redevelopment Coordinator Zeg1 er stated he
contacted C. W. Clark, broker for Saga Corporation. The broker indicated they
were not interested in locating a restaurant comparable to the quality of a
"Velvet Turtle" at this site. Their proposal for a "Spoons" restaurant is
similar to the Fuddruckers Restaurant being constructed at the Focus Area site
downtown.
Regarding the Appel Development proposal, the RFP did not request proposals
for hotel development; however, the developer was not discouraged from
submitting this type of use in his proposal.
Member Malcolm stated that since the Eye Physicians Group has withdrawn their
proposal for this parcel, the Agency Attorney advises he can participate and
vote on this item. Acting Agency Attorney Gill concurred with Member
Malcolm's comments.
MOTION TO ACCEPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION
MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to accept the staff recommendation (authorizing staff to
enter into negotiation with Paul Thoryk for the purpose of preparing an
Exclusive Negotiation Agreement).
Member Malcolm suggested if Bay Blvd., Ltd. is still interested, they should
contact Income Property Group regarding development possibilities at the
mari na.
Chairman Cox, noting the presence of the appl icant for the South Bay Community
Chapel request, suggested Item 3 be reconsidered at this time.
___..._. ._....w...... ___...',___ _ _ ___._m'..'_'_'·'__'_"~'··'_·__··__··_~·_'·_~ - - - -..----
Adjourned Regular
Redevelopment Agency Meeting - 6 - Apr i 1 19, 1984
MOTION TO RECONSIDER ITEM 3
MSUC (Moore/Scott) reconsider Item #3.
ITEM NO.3 - REPORT: SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY CHAPEL - LAND USE PERMIT
Mr. Jim Goins, Pastor, South Bay Community Chapel, P.O. Box 7062, Chu1a Vista,
92012. expl ained ampl e parking is available for church services at the
proposed temporary location. The congregation includes 120 members, but
evangelistically-speaking, this includes adults and children, all of whom do
not drive cars to church.
In answer to Member Malcolm's question, Commun i ty Development Director
Desrochers reiterated that this type of request does not require Parking Place
Commission review, nor is a conditional use permit necessary.
MOTION TO ACCEPT RECOMMENDATION
MSUC (Scott/Moore) to accept the staff recommendation.
MEMBERS' COMMENTS - None.
DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS
Executive Director Goss requested a Closed Session to discuss matters of
litigation.
MOTION TO ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
MSUC (Cox/Moore) to adjourn to Closed Session.
ADJOURNMENT at 4:42 p.m. to the City Council meeting and to Closed Session
immediately following (6:05 p.m.). The Recording Secretary was excused and
the Executive Secretary reported that Closed Session . urned at 6:40 p.m.
WPC 1090H
"" ..____'__'n.._______ _____._~~_~_.____._____