Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 1996/07/16
"I dedare bIn:;er pC?13:t.'J 0: ~erJl.!ry that 1 am employed bi ·c.· C : t!' (1 ~Is"~Q in the Office or tiw ( ; .¡:' ,"- ~.~. .)Sod Tuesday, July 16, 1996 this Agenjuj-"Jü,¡" G en 'tho ;.:';.d,e :;['1 l303rd at Council Chambers the Public rvi s Du" jinj En al Cit 6:00 p.m. DATED. 7, 1;;2 76' SIGNED " Public Services Building ~ Re!!Ular Meetin. of the Citv of REVISED CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Alevy _' Moot _' Padilla _. Rindone _, and Mayor Horton _. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER 3. APPRO V AL OF MINUTES: None submitted. 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: a. Oath of Office: Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee - Marco Polo Cortez; and Youth Commission - Angela Kodicek. b. Update on the Port District by Port Commissioner David Malcolm. ***** Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now reconvene into open session to report any final actions taken in closed session and to adjourn the meeting. Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However, final actions reported will be recorded in the minutes which will be availoble in the City Clerk's Office. ***** CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 10) The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak Form" availoble in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter from the Interim City Attorney stating that there was not reportable actions in Closed Session on 7/9/96. 11 is recommended that the letter be received and filed. b. Letter of resignation from the Board of Ethics - Virgil Whitehead. 11 is recommended that the resignation be accepted with regret and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according to the Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library. . ..--- Agenda -2- July 16, 1996 6. A. ORDINANCE 2679 ADOPTING THE PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND OTA Y RANCH, L.P., A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP, TIGER DEVELOPMENT TWO, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY TIGERHEART INC" A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ITS GENERAL PARTNER, VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP (second readini! and adootion) - Staff recommends Council place the ordinances on second reading and adoption. (Deputy City Manager Krempl) B. ORDINANCE 2680 ADOPTING THE PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SNMB, LTD., JEWELS OF CHARITY, AND STEVEN AND MARY BIRCH FOUNDATION (second readin. and adootion) C. ORDINANCE 2681 ADOPTING THE PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND UNITED ENTERPRISES LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (second readin. and adootion) D. ORDINANCE 2682 ADOPTING THE PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND GREGORY T. SMITH AND GEORGIANA R. SMITH (second readiDl! and adootion) 7. REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 8. ORDINANCE 2684 AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 19.18.010 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY REZONING APPROXIMATELY 25,000 SQUARE FEET OF LAND LOCATED AT 415/445 ORANGE A VENUE, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ORANGE A VENUE BETWEEN BROADW A Y AND FOURTH A VENUE, FROMR2P (DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL WITH PRECISE PLAN MODIFIER) TO MHP (MOBILE HOME PARK ZONE) (second readin. and adootion) - The proposal is to rezone two areas totaling approximately 25, 000 square feet from the existing zoning designation of R2P (Duplex residential with precise plan modifier) to MHP (Mobile home park zone) in order to allow these areas to be officially consolidated into the existing surrounding mobile home park. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (Director of Planning) 9.A. ORDINANCE 2685 AMENDING SECTION 2.05.010 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL UNCLASSIFIED CALIFORNIA BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP FULL-TIME POSITIONS (lirst readin2) - This is to authorize the City to act as the Fiscal Agent for Califomia Border Alliance Group (CBAG), extend funding for present CBAG staff and add two staff positions to the CBAG staff. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading and approve the resolutions. (Chief of Police) B. RESOLUTION ]8360 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT BY AND THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR FISCAL AGENT SERVICES C. RESOLUTION 18361 AMENDING THE FRINGE BENEFIT RESOLUTION FOR EXECUTIVES AND MID-MANAGERS TO INCLUDE TWO CALIFORNIA BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP FULL-TIME POSITIONS --.---.--.-- Agenda -3- July 16, 1996 D. RESOLUTION 18362 ACCEPTING $22,950 OF IIIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CALIFORNIA BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP (CRAG), APPROPRIATING UNANTICIPATED GRANT REVENUES IN THE GENERAL FUND, AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 BUDGET TO INCLUDE A TOTAL OF 2.00 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS SUBJECT TO CONTINUED GRANT FUNDING - 4/5th's vote required E. RESOLUTION 18363 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT AND PERSONNEL ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT, AND AMENDING THE BUDGET TO APPROPRIA TE THE FUNDS RECEIVED UNDER THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT TO THE EMPLOYEE EXPENSES FOR THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR POSITION, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENTS, FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 F. RESOLUTION 18364 1) ACCEPTING $61,709 OF IIIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) GRANT FUNDS TO THE CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADMINISTERED BY THE MASTER FISCAL AGENT SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE OTHER AGENCIES PER THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE OTHER CITIES TO EXTEND THE TWO CBAG POSITIONS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DECEMBER 5, 1995 10. RESOLUTION 18365 GRANTING EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY TO PLACE GUY POLE AND ANCHOR WITHIN CITY'S MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE - San Diego Gas and Electric Company has requested an easement from the City to install a gny pole and anchor on the eastern edge of the golf course. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works and Director of Parks and Recreation) * * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * * PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as rezuired by low. If you wish to Òeak to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" availoble in the obby and submit it to the City lerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to fi~e minutes per individual. 11. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERING: (A) PCM-96-09 - AMENDMENTS TO THE RANCHO DEL REY SPA III SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES, WATER CONSERVATION PLAN AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN; AND (B) PCS-96-05 - TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP, TRACT 96-05 - The applicant, Rancho Del Rey Investments, L.P., has requested the amendments to the Rancho Del Rey Spa III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, General Development Plan, Planned Community District Regulations, Residential Design Guidelines, Water Conservation Plan and Air Quality Improvemeot Plan. The purpose of these amendments are to change the land use designation of parcel R-7 from Residential Specialty Housing (SP) to Single Family Detached (SFD) and Residential Duplex/Townbomes (SF A). Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading and approve the resolution. (Director of Planning) A. ORDINANCE 2686 AMENDING THE RANCHO DEL REY SPA III SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND LAND USE DISTRICT MAP (first readin !) Agenda -4- July 16, 1996 B. RESOLUTION 18366 AMENDING THE RANCHO DEL REY SPA ill SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN CHANGING PARCEL R-7 LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM SPECIALTY HOUSING (SH) TO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (SFD) AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED (SFA); APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR 156 ACRES AT THE RANCHO DEL REY SPA ill, TRACT 96-06 AND ADOPTING ADDENDUM TO FEIR 89-10 11.1 PUBLIC HEARING ADOPTION OF THE OTAYRANCHRESERVE FUND FEE - On 5/14/96, Council established the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program which has two components: (a) a Reserve Fund fee to be paid by the developer/applicant, and (b) the Otay Ranch Property Tax Transfer Agreement with the County of San Diego. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading. (Deputy City Manager Thomson and Director of Finance) Continued from the meeting of 7/9/96. ORDINANCE 2683 ESTABLISHING THE OTAY RANCH RESERVE FUND FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION 18288, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE OTAY RANCH RESERVE FUND PROGRAM (first readin~) 12. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NUMBER I FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 _ Based upon the advice of the City Attomey, this agenda item has been separated due to conflict of interest concerns. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works and Director of Parks and Recreation) RESOLUTION 18367 ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 13. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NUMBER 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, this agenda item has been separated due to conflict of interest concerns. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works and Director of Parks and Recreation) RESOLUTION 18368 ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NUMBER 10 14. PUBLIC HEARING EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 - Based upon the advice of the City Attomey, this agenda item has been separated due to conflict of interest concerns. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works and Director of Parks and Recreation) RESOLUTION 18369 ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 15. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS 2-9,11,14,15,17,18,20,23,24,26,31, BAY BOULEVARD, AND TOWN CENTER FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 - The City administers 24 open space districts established over the last twenty-five years. The districts provide the mechanism to finance the maintenance of common open space areas (canyons, trails, medians, etc.) associated with and benefitting that particular development. As part of the process, a levy of an annual assessment is necessary to enable the City to collect funds for the Agenda -5- July 16, 1996 proposed open space maintenance. On 5/23/96, Council approved the open space reports on assessments for all existing open space districts and setting the public hearings. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works and Director of Parks and Recreation) RESOLUTION 18370 ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS 2-9,11,14,15,17,18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 31, BAY BOULEVARD, AND TOWN CENTER 16. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER 69 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF THE BA YSHORE BIKE ROUTE PROPOSED WITHIN THE COASTAL ZONE - Caltrans, in conjunction with local jurisdictions and the San Diego Unified Port District, plan to construct a 26 mile long, regional bicycle route that will traverse the perimeter of San Diego Bay with a portion in Chula Vista. Most of the route will be marked within the existing street right-of-way; but a portion, located within the Chula Vista coastal rone, is proposed to be constructed west of and adjacent to 1-5. Staff recommends the Dublic heariDl! be continued to 7/23/96. (Director of Community Development) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the Council'sjurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State low, however, generally prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees. None submitted. ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form availoble in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public comments are limited to five minutes. 17. RESOLUTION 18371 APPROVING PROPOSED SPENDING ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED QUARTER OF A CENT SALES TAX FOR LIBRARIES - The County of San Diego has proposed putting a quarter of a cent sales tax, to be collected for five years to supplement local library budgets, on the November 1996 ballot. If approved by 2/3rds of County voters, this sales tax increase would raise approximately $3 million dollars a year, or $15 million total for the Chula Vista Public Library. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Library Director) f Agenda -6- July 16, 1996 18. REPORT REESTABLISHMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY TASK FORCE AND FUNDING FOR BIOLOGICAL CONSULT ANT FOR UNIVERSITY SITE ANALYSIS - On 5/28/96, Council directed staff to include draft policy language relating to the proposed university site in the City's draft Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan for analysis in the MSCP EIRIEIS. In order to provide additional input into decisions relating to this issue, staff is recommending that Council reestablish the University Task Force. In addition, staff recommends approval of resolution. (Assistant City Manager and Director of Planning) RESOLUTION 18372 APPROPRIATING $10,000 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED GENERAL FUND BALANCE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY SITEALTERNA TIVES AND REESTABLISHING THE UNIVERSITY TASK FORCE - 4/Sth's vote required. 19. REPORT REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT SUBAREA PLAN FOR THE MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM (MSCP) - On 5/21/96, Council conducted a public hearing on the draft MSCP Subarea Plan and directed staff to forward the draft, along with Council's concems, to the City of San Diego for inclusion in the environmental analysis (ElRlElS) being conducted on the MSCP and associated Subarea Plans. Since that time, staff has been meeting with the Wildlife Agencies to respond to their concems with the draft Subarea Plan. Staff recommends Council authorize that revisions to the Subarea Plan be forwarded to the City of San Diego for evaluation in the final draft ElRIEIS for the overall MSCP plan. (Director of Planning) ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers. Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual. OTHER BUSINESS 20. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTlS) a. Scheduling of meetings. 21. MAYOR'S REPORT IS) a. RESOLUTION 18373 SUPPORTING HUD FUNDING FOR NON-PROFIT HOUSING ACQffiSITIONS 22. COUNCIL COMMENTS Agenda -7- July 16, 1996 ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjoum to (a closed session and thence to) the regular City Council meeting on July 23, 1996 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A Joint Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council Meeting. ***** CLOSED SESSION Unless the City Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are permitted by law to be the subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the interests of the City. The Council is required by low to return to open session, issue any reports of final action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session, reports of final action taken, and atijournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be availoble in the City Clerk's Office. 23. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING: 1. Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 · Erxleben vs. the City of Chula Vista · Christopher vs. the City of Chula Vista · West Coast Land Fund vs. the City of Chula Vista 2. Anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 · Fritsch vs. the City of Chula Vista · Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: I. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELEASE - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 . Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, POA, 1AFF, Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. Employee organization: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) and Westem Council of Engineers (WCE), Police Officers Associatioo (POA) and Intemational Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF). Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. 24. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION >Ie**** . .---.-"-.-.--.~"--'.--.'--..---.--"----"..~.."- July 11, 1996 TO: The Honorable Mayor and city counc~ FROM: John D. Goss, city Manage~G¡ ~Ä SUBJECT: city council Meeting of July 9, 96~ This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular city council meeting of Tuesday, July 16, 1996. Comments regarding the written communications are as follows: 5a. This is a letter from the Interim city Attorney stating that there were no observed reportable actions taken by the city council in Closed session on July 9, 1996. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED. 5b. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE RESIGNATION OF VIRGIL WHITEHEAD FROM THE BOARD OF ETHICS BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET AND THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED TO POST IMMEDIATELY ACCORDING TO THE MADDY ACT IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND THE PUBLIC LIBRARY. JDG:mab .- -.-- ~-_._-. ~~~ -: .d:~ ~ ~~~~ .......~~- CllY OF CHUIA VISfA OFFICE OF THE CITY A TIORNEY Date: July 10, 1996 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council rnA From: Ann Y. Moore, Interim City Attorney lA, ' Re: Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session for the Meeting of 7/9/96 The City Council met in Closed Session to discuss Christopher v. city of Chula vista, West Coast Land Fund v. city of Chula Vista, significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 54956.9(1), Donn Gordon v. the City of Chula vista and labor negotiations. The Interim city Attorney hereby reports to the best of my knowledge from observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the Interim City Attorney participated, that there were no actions taken in the Closed Session of 7/9/96 which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. AYM: Igk C:\lt\clossed.no ~-/ 276 FOURTH AVENUE. CHULA VISTA· CALIFORNIA 91910 . (619) 691-5037 . FAX (619) 585-5612 ©PoI.ca&Irøfll!c)dild~ ----------_..._-"~-~-'--- í-·-----u----- ...,..-.--. r, ' lip! . I, "ECEIVEEI "r-- ..... .-"-..----- Ii "<! ! i P : I -,' I,ll,· uU i Jl - :¡ gC)n ' I ¡i.J' '96 .u.. -3 P 1 :07 L. --.-__--.J Mayor Shirley Horton r.c:,'ueIL (if 'i(:!_S , c:·:):.r \:..:l;,i!\!:.A lIœA YISU Mayor, City of Chula Vista . "S tffi(ìE 276 fourth Avenue Chula Vista, Ca 91910 June 26, 1996 Dear Madam Mayor, Iwwas recently reappointed as a member of the city ethics board and for that I want to thank you and the Council very much. I have been requested to go to Saudi Arabia and I have accepted the assignment; regretfully I must resign the membership of the ethics board, effectively immediately. I feel that you have a very good board and will serve the city well; however they do require the support of the Council and your office. They are on the cutting edge of doing a procedural policy that is sorely needed in the city. For information no city has an acceptable set of ethical standards but given the support that the board needs, you should be the first one in San Diego County to have one. A Departmental set of policies and procedures are also very necessary and should be completed without delay. I have enjoyed serving the city and working with a very professional group of volunteers. ¥§,tf"id rf6f-' i ,1 hiteheaö cc: Susan Herney, Chair~Board of Ethics-Chula Vista Lorraine Kraker-Secretary-Board of Ethics WRIUEN C'f"iMMU'" ?I~CA 1"10N5 ' U '_' '~"ø' , CC,' g-' /f~ (tj) ¡kz f;~/1? ~~ S'b-/ '.') __ ___.______m_.__.__..._m__ - ---~~--~----,---_.._-------- Revised 6-24-96 ORDINANCE NO. 2679 ,O~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VI~-<": ADOPTING THE PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPM T AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VIS~AND OTAY RANCH, L.P., A CALIFORNIA PART~SHIP, TIGER DEVELOPMENT TWO, A CALIFORN~;: IMITED PARTNERSHIP BY TIGERHEART INC.,~ ALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ITS GENERAL P~ R, VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, A CALIFORNIA GE~L PARTNERSHIP ~~\;- WHEREAS, a city of Chula Vista application is pending before the County of San Diego and LAFCO to have the otay Valley Parcel included within City's sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the development of the otay Valley Parcel will require substantial public improvements phased over a period of time; and WHEREAS, California Government Code §65867.5 et seq. provides authority for cities to enter into development agreements; and - WHEREAS, CEQA review is not required for the development agreement since an in-depth review occurred when the environmental review was approved for the otay Ranch General Development Plan and adopted by the city on October 28, 1993. (Lona Beach Sav. & Loan v. Lona Beach Redevel., 232 Cal.Rptr. 772, 881-2 [1986]); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and city Council held a joint public hearing on . June 25, 1996 to consider the Pre- Annexation Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the Pre-Annexation Development Agreement and recommend its approval. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista ordains as follows: SECTION I: Pre-Annexation Development Agreement for a portion of the Otay valley. Parcel. < accor-ðance with section 65867.5 of the Government .- In Code, the City Council of the city of Chula Vista has approved that certain document entitled "Pre-Annexation Development Agr'eement" for a portion of the Otay Valley Parcel with otay Ranch, L.P. , a California limited partnership, Tiger Development Two, a California limited partnership, by Tigerheart Inc. , a California corporation, its general partner, Village Development, a . ~ Þ/?Î - / , California general partnership, on file in the office of .. the City Clerk as Document No. . SECTION II: The Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista. SECTION III: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the 'thirtieth day fram BP1à aft.eJ:" i~s pa9sB§£: effective date of annexation-as set forth in the attached Pre- Annexation Development Aareement. Presented by Approved as to form by Ov-- ~ ~ George Krempl, Deputy City Ann Y. Moore, Interim Manager City Attorney c: \or\preannex.ov "" .-? -' .,.clA ~6/fl-;2.. . California general partnership, on file in the office of . the City Clerk as Document No. . SECTION II: The Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista. SECTION III: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the t.hirtie't.1\ day fram 8J\Š after its passage effective date of annexation' as set forth in the attached Pre- Annexation Development Aareement. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ VJ ~ George Krempl, Deputy City Ann Y. Moore, Interim Manager City Attorney c:\or\preannex.ov "" -, .,::¿ - AP- ~6~-;Z . -.-.-.-.-.-. _~._"_.._u ,. Rev~d .6-24-96 ORDINANCE NO. 2680 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ~LA VISTA ADOPTING THE PRE-ANNEXATION ,'DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ~ULA VISTA AND SNMB, LTD., JEWELS OF CHARITy:.·AND STEVEN AND MARY BIRCH FOUNDATION WHEREAS, a City of Chula vista application is pending before the County of San Diego and LAFCO to have the otay Valley Parcel included within city's sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the development of the Otay Valley Parcel will require substantial public improvements phased over a period of time; and WHEREAS, California Government Code §65867.5 et seq. provides authority for cities to enter into development agreements; and WHEREAS, CEQA review is not required for the development agreement $ince an in-depth review occurred when the environmental review was approved for the Otay Ranch General Development Plan and adopted by-the City on October 28, 1993. (Lona Beach Sav. & Loan v. Lona Beach Redevel.,. 232 Cal.Rptr. 772, 881-2 [1986]); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and city Council held a joint public hearing on June 25, 1996 to consider the Pre- Annexation Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the Pre-Annexation Development Agreement and recommend its approval. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the city of Chula vista ordains as follows: SECTION I: Pre-Annexation Development Agreement for a portion of the Otay Valley Parcel. In accordance with section 65867.5 of the Government Code, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has approved that certain document entitled "Pre-Annexation Development Agreement" for a portion of the Otay Valley Parcel with SNMB, Ltd., Jewels of Charity, and Steven and Mary Birch Foundation on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No. . SECTION II: The Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the city of Chula Vista. ~g-/ .- ~ ~ 'I' \ j ...-.--. SECTION III: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the tfiirtictA àa:f fram a¡:¡à after it.s paas6,!e effective date of annexation as set forth in the attached Pre- Annexation Development Aqreement. Presented by Approved as to form by George Krempl, Deputy City 0--- ~ ~ Ann Y. Moore, Interim Manager City Attorney C:\or\preannex,ov .- ¡ ~(5-~ 68- c:2 ~ ~~f ~Þß LATHAM & WATKINS ATTORNEYS AT LAW NEW JERSEY OFFICE PAUL R. WATKINS (189g-1973 ONE NEWARK CENTER DANA LATHAM (1898-19741 701 "8" STREET, SUITE 2100 NEWARK, NEW JERSEY 07101-3174 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 -8 197 TELEPHONE 12011 639-1234 TELEPHONE (619) 236-1234 FAX 12011 639-7298 CHICAGO OFFICE SEARS TOWER, SUITE 5800 FAX 16191 696-7419 NEW YORK OFFICE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 885 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 1000 TELEPHONE (3121 876-7700 TLX 590778 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022-4802 FAX (3121 993-9767 ELN 62793276 TELEPHONE (2121 906-1200 FAX (2121 761-4864 LONDON OFFICE ONE ANGEL COURT ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE LONDON EC2R 7HJ ENGLAND 650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 2000 TELEPHONE + 44-71·3744444 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1925 FAX + 44-71-3744460 TELEPHONE (714) 540-1235 July 16, 1996 FAX (714) 755-8290 LOS ANGELES OFFICE 633 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 4000 SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-2007 505 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 1900 TELEPHONE (2131485-1234 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-2562 FAX (213) 891-8763 TELEPHONE f4151391-0600 FAX 1415) 395·8095 MOSCOW OFFICE 113/1 LENINSKY PROSPECT, SUITE C200 WASHINGTON. D.C. OFFICE MOSCOW 117198 RUSSIA 1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 1300 TELEPHONE + 7-503 956-5555 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-2505 FAX + 7-503956·5556 TELEPHONE (2021 637·2200 FAX (202) 637-2201 BY HAND DELIVERY City Council City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Re: SN~ DeveloDment j\greement Dear City Councilmembers: I write on behalf of my client, MCA Concerts, Inc. concerning the City of Chula Vista's plans to enter into a development agreement with SN~ and related parties. The City Council may have before it tonight either the second reading of a development agreement with SN~ and other related parties, or the first reading of a revised development agreement with SN~. (We had previously been told that the development agreement would be revised, and presented again for a new first reading, but tlÎis was not confirmed in the City Council agenda we received this afternoon.) As we have informed your City Manager, Planning Director and Deputy City Attorney in our meetings with them, MCA is quite concerned by the terms of this development agreement. We believe the development agreement as written represents a failure to consider or even consult with other projects and land uses in the vicinity which could be affected by the changes in zoning contemplated or provided for in the development agreement, including MCA Concerts. We also believe the development agreement is an attempt by SN~ to injure the City's legal position in the case which SNMB has filed against the City of Chula Vista, San Diego Superior Court Case No. 695489. SD\WP51\ LA THAM & WATKINS City Council July 16, 1996 Page 2 MCA Concerts, Inc. is opposed to the development agreement as written. The development agreement appears to be an attempt to grant a vested right or other contractual rights in a rezoning decision that the City Council has yet to consider. The California Government Code provisions governing development agreements do not authorize a City to enter into an agreement which grants any vested or contractual rights concerning future discretionary actions of the City involving future changes in zoning. Additionally, the SNMB Development Agreement is not consistent with Chula Vista's existing General Plan, because, among other things, it contemplates residential development at densities and in locations which are not consistent with the General Plan. Additionally, the development agreement does not comply with other provisions of the Government Code governing such agreements. The development agreement also appears to be a "first step" discretionary decision concerning an increase in residential development, beyond the levels and at locations other than contemplated in the City's existing zoning and planning decisions. Before any residential development is considered for the portions of SNMB's property which are now zoned "industrial," the City must first comply with the California Environmental Quality Act, ("CEQA"). This new discretionary decision is not exempt from CEQA, nor is it covered by prior environmental review conducted for the Otay Ranch proj ect. Before taking action on this SNMB Development Agreement, we believe the City should fully explain what zoning changes it intends to make, and consult with surrounding affected project. Additionally, we urge the City Council to amend the development agreement so that it does not contain an references to residential development, other than as set forth in the existing Otay Ranch planning documents, including the densities and locations already specified in those documents. Additionally, the_ development agreement should be amended to grant the City the exclusive authority at any time to make any zoning and planning decisions necessary to respond to the arguments made by SNMB in San Diego Superior Court Case No. 695489. Without these consultations with surrounding affected projects, such as the MCA Amphitheater project, and without these changes, MCA Concerts is opposed to the development agreement. SD\WP51\ LATHAM & WATKINS City Council July 16, 1996 Page 3 MCA is convinced that its project is consistent with surrounding land uses, and that by working together in good faith with the City and surrounding land owners MCA's project will be consistent with future development projects. However, by considering a development agreement with provisions for future changes in zoning without first describing and analyzing the impact of those future changes. Sincerely, W ~ ~r W. Garrett ~;ti~ & WATKINS SD\WP5l\ ~,o~ Revised 6-24-96 & ~ ORDINANCE NO. 2681 ~Ç) '?' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ~ULA VISTA ADOPTING THE PRE-ANNEXATI~Ç) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF . ULA VISTA AND UNITED ENTERPRISES, LTD., A~LIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP <cý S,V WHEREAS, a city of Chula Vista application is pending before the County of San Diego and LAFCO to have the Otay Valley Parcel included within City's sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the development of the Otay Valley Parcel will require substantial public improvements phased over a period of time; and WHEREAS, California Government Code §65867.5 et seq. provides authority for cities to enter into development agreements; and WHEREAS, CEQA review is not required for the development agreement since an in-depth review occurred when the environmental review was approved for the otay Ranch General Development Plan and adopted by , the city on October 28, 1993. (Lona Beach Sav. & Loan v. Lona Beach Redevel., 232 Cal.Rptr. 772, 881-2 [1986]); and WHEREAS, the Planning commission and City Council held a joint public hearing on June 25, 1996 to consider the Pre- Annexation Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the Pre-Annexation Development Agreement and recommend its approval. NOW, THEREFORE, the city Council of the city of Chula Vista ordains as follows: SECTION I: Pre-Annexation Development Agreement for a portion of the Otay Valley Parcel. In accordance with Section 65867.5 of the Government Code, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has approved that certain document entitled "Pre-Annexation Development Agreement" for a portion of the Otay Valley Parcel with united Enterprises, Ltd., a California limited partnership on file in the office of the City Clerk as'Document No. . SECTION II: The Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista. SECTION III: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the tl=1irt.ie~h àay fram a'p¡à af'ter it-a 13aaS8EJE ,', " ¿c-/ , -dC-t"" " -,----- effective date of annexation as set forth in the attached Pre- Annexation Development Aqreement. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ V\ Y\Á .~...... George Krempl, Deputy City Ann Y. ,~ . Moore, Inter~m Manager City Attorney c: \ol"\preann,x. ov 0 , ..~ &C-c2 , dC ~ , Rev~ed 6-24-96 ~O # ORDINANCE NO. 2682 ~ ~ . ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CH~ ~VISTA ADOPTING THE PRE-ANNEXATION D LOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHU~ ISTA AND GREGORY T. SMITH AND GEORGIANA ~ MITH WHEREAS, a City of Chula v~~apPlication is pending before the County of San Diego and LA to have the otay Valley Parcel included within City's sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the development of the Otay Valley Parcel will require substantial public improvements phased over a period of time; and WHEREAS, California Government Code §65867.5 et seq. provides authority for cities to enter into development agreements; and WHEREAS, CEQA review is not required for the development agreement since an in-depth review occurred when the environmental review was approved for the Otay Ranch General Development Plan and adopted by the City on October 28, 1993. (Lona Beach Sav. & Loan v. Lona Beach Redevel., 232 Cal.Rptr. 772, 881-2 [1986]); and - WHEREAS, the Planning commission and City Council held a joint public hearing on June 25, 1996 to consider the Pre- Annexation Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and city Council have reviewed the Pre-Annexation Development Agreement and recommend its approval. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista ordains as follows: SECTION I: Pre-Annexation Development Agreement for a portion of the Otay Valley Parcel. In accordance with section 65867.5 of the Government Code, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has approved that certain document entitled "Pre-Annexation Development Agreement" for a portion of the otay Valley Parcel with Gregory T. Smith and Georgiana R. Smith on file in-the office of the city Clerk as Document No._ -' - SECTION II: The Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. SECTION III: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the 'thirtictR day fram 8ßå after it.s passagE- ~¿;:p-/ effective date of annexation as set forth in the attached Pre- . Annexation Development Aoreement. Presented by Approved as to form by ú.-. VI rL~.,.. 0 . George Krempl, Deputy City Ann Y. Moore, Interim Manager city Attorney C:\or\preannex,ov " - ~ ~ þ .--~ .. ORDINANCE NO. . .,2¿8''/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION r\\O~ ,......,. OF TIlE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL ~ REZONING APPROXIMATELY 25,000 SQUARE FEET OF LOCATED AT 415/445 ORANGE AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH OF ORANGE A VENUE BETWEEN BROADWAY AND FO~ NUE, FROM R2P (DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL WITH PRECISE P ODIFIER) TO MHP, (MOBILE HOME PARK ZONE) ~<vçp~ WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a rezone was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning Department on May I, 1996 by Terry Enterprises; and, WHEREAS, said application requests approval to rezone two areas totaling approximately 25,000 square feet from R2P to MHP for purposes of incorporating said areas into the existing mobilehome park, for property located at 415/445 Orange Avenue, on the south side of Orange Avenue as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the proposed project is a Class 3(a) exemption (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) under Section 15303 of CEQA; and, WHEREAS, on June 12, 1996, the City Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the City Council approve the rezoning in accordance with Resolution PCZ 96-B; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said rezoning application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely June 12, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby fmd, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION I: the City Council hereby fmds that the rezoning provided for herein is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and that the rezoning is supported by public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. SECTION II: that the land areas at 415/445 Orange Avenue, as shown on attached Exhibit A is hereby rezoned from R2P to MHP, Mobile Home Park. ~ fÇ~J \ - - _.__.~.__._'"- '__.m. -- --.-~-.-.------"'------.--.--.--..- SECTION III: this Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force the thirtieth day from its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by Q.-- 'lK ~ 0 Robert A. Leiter City Attorney Director of Planning (m:\homc:\planning\jc:ff\ccord) ~25~2 . . e ~ITA ITREET [ (JJJJJJ . r " 111111"1 CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT . ê!5 ~, tiny .dIdIM1"" IICWCr I ........ REZONE' CONDlnONAL USE PERMIT ~. .'11"'0. I' II JI ~........ tram 121' III MHI' and CUI' ICAII: III NUMIII: l! a ilfia l n ...w _.. ,,'''' III moW\I honW parte. NORTH No loa. I'Q~I. POe''''7 . ,EXHIBIT A ~Z:3 - -.- .-. _ .·..·____·_·_..._·'....____._m._.' COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 9 Meeting Date 7~1] " ~ftð~ o//~/'~ ITEM TITLE: A. Ordinance ,,2~ff' Amending section 2.05.010 of the Chula vista Municipal Code to add two additional unclassified California Border Alliance Group full-time positions. B. ResolutionJ¿r3~~pproving an Agreement between the City of Chula vista and the united states Government by and through the Executive Offices of the united states Attorney for fiscal agent services. C. Resolution JY.3¿.1 Amending the Fringe Benefit Resolutions for Executives and Mid-Managers to include two California Border Alliance Group positions. D. Resolution /1l'.3(':1.1) accepting $22,950 of High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant funds through the United states Attorneys Office for administrative costs associated with the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) , 2) appropriating unanticipated grant revenues in the General Fund, and 3) amending the Fiscal Year 1996-97 budget to include total of 2.00 FTE positions subject to continued grant funding. E. Resolution JY:U.3 Approving Reimbursement Agreement and an Intergovernmental Personnel Assignment Agreement and amending the budget to appropriate the funds received under the Reimbursement Agreement to the Employee Expenses for the Deputy Director, and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreements, FY 1996-97. F. Resolution )~.1~~AccePting $61,709 of High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant funds to the Chula vista Police Department, administered by the Master Fiscal Agent San Diego Police Department for the other agencies per the Memorandum of Understanding with the other citles to extend the two CBAG positions previously approved December 5, 1995. SUBMITTED BY: Chief of Police ~ REVIEWED BY: city Manager {,11qJ1!o (4/5th's Vote: Yes X No ) - On September 5, 1995, City Council Approved the City of Chula vista to act as the "fiscal agent" for the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) and act as conduit to obtain civilian support personnel and to 9-/ -_..---- -----+-- Page 2, Item ~ Meeting Date ..:Tn'". II l!i'~) 0 . /,1 9~ acquire related supplies and services for three employees (Attachmen A) . We are now being asked by the United states Attorney I s Office (USA) to add two employees to the CBAG support personnel compliment. These employees are currently employed by the united states Attorney's Office as CBAG personnel and would be hired by the city of Chula vista. The hiring of the Deputy Director to take effect July 1,1996, and the Coordinator for operationsjCBAG to take effect January 1, 1997. These employees would continue to work in the united States Attorney's Office and perform their same duties, however, the ci ty would become the "fiscal agent" for these two employees as well as continue to be the "fiscal agent" for the previous three CBAG employees. The proposed ordinance and resolutions would enable Chula vista to act in this capacity, result in the full reimbursement of all expenditures by the City in support of CBAG and compensate the City for related processing costs at the rate of 2% of total CBAG expenditures. The funding is a combination of funds from the USA as well as the San Diego Police Department Master Fiscal Agent MOU (Attachment B). RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed Ordinance and Resolutions. The staff recommendation will: 1) create 2.0 additional Unclassified CBAG positions; 2) provide for the city to be reimbursed for all expenses associated with hiring these CBAG positions including a nominal processing cost reimbursement; 3) make appropriate technical adjustments to the Police Department's Grant Fund budget to support these actions. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A I. BACKGROUND The united States Attorney's Office - Southern District of California (USA), a division of the united States Department of Justice (DOJ), has received federal funding to implement the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG). The mission of CBAG is to develop multi-jurisdictional, cooperative strategies to: a) gather intelligence on drug traffickers; b) investigate drug trafficking activities; c) arrest persons involved with illegal drug trafficking; and, d) to successfully prosecute those arrested. CBAG is funded through a "High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area" (HIDTA) supplemental funding provision contained in the Federal Appropriations Acts for each federal fiscal year from 1988 to 1996 (the current federal fiscal year); the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988; and, the National Drug Control Strategy of 1990. San Diego and Imperial counties have been designated as a HIDTA due to the volume of illegal narcotics entering the united States through the international border frontier. The City of San Diego, through the Police Department, is the Master Fiscal Agent for the area fiscal agent approved cities. The San Diego Police Department receives an annual allocation of HIDTA funding by making application to the DOJ prior to each federal fiscal year. The application reflects the personnel and non-personnel costs for each \ 9 .. ,,2.. (\ _m....'_ ____._. _..__~______"_ Page 3, Item f Meeting Date 8al~ 9, 199( ~¿;f9t' agency expected to participate in CBAG during the next fiscal year. upon approval of this grant application #110100, participating agencies, including the City, assigns one or more sworn law enforcement officers to CBAG. During the course of the year, participating agencies make individual claims to obtain reimbursement from the DOJ for expenses related to their CBAG assigned officer. As articulated in the FY 1996-97 Police Department Grant Funds - Operation Alliance budget (100-1094), the CVPD has assigned 1.0 Police Agent to CBAG. The ordinance and resolutions proposed by staff will: * increase the number of unclassified positions from three to five (Existing-CBAG Executive Director; CBAG Analyst; CBAG Secretary; Add-CBAG Deputy Executive Director effective July 1, 1996; and, CBAG Coordinator for Operations/Intelligence POlicy, Plans, and Program requirements effective January 1, 1997) required to ~rovide to an appropriate level of administrative support to this 1mportant national security effort; * extend the CBAG Executive and Secretary funded positions FY 1996-97 and transition the reimbursement funding from the Imperial County Sheriff's Department to the Master Fiscal Agent, San Diego Police Department effective July 1, 1996, funding for these positions was appropriated through the FY 1996-97 budget adoption; * provide for the City to be reimbursed for all expenses associated with hiring and maintaining the five positions including a processing fee payable to the City that will be calculated at 2% of total funds passed through the city to CBAG; * direct the staff to place the two new unclassified positions in the City's salary and benefits plans, authorize the Chief of police, subject to the approval of the City Manager, to appoint Ron Papania CBAG Deputy Director and Kean McAdams CBAG Coordinator for Operations effective the official date of city council action on these items; and, * direct staff to amend the Police Department's Grant Fund budget in the manner prescribed in Attachment C. II. DISCUSSION A. participation and Cooperation. One of the primary Congressional policy objectives of CBAG is to increase coo~eration between federal, state and local law enforcement jurisd1ctions. Accordingly, the CBAG effort is staffed by sworn, civil service employees from local, state and federal law enforcement agencies. HIDTA funds cannot be expended unless each level of law enforcement in HIDTA designated region is represented in the effort. Federal agencies represented in CBAG include the united States Customs Service, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the united States Border Patrol. State 9~3 , Page 4, Item 9 Meeting Date .:1....,y ð 1ðR6?J. . '/I,/f ¡, agencies represented in CBAG include the Bureau . of Narcotic Enforcement, the Imperial County Sheriff, the San Diego County Sheriff and the District Attorneys of both counties. Local agencies represented in CBAG include San Diego Unified Port Department and numerous municipal police departments including Chula vista Police Department (CVPD). In total, fourteen (14) agencies and over one-hundred sworn officers participate in the CBAG effort. The Office of the USA coordinates the efforts of participating agencies to ensure this cooperation and representation exists. B. CBAG support staffing. The united States Attorney's office sought and received additional federal funding to hire a total of five full-time administrative and managerial support personnel: an Executive Director, an Analyst, an Secretary (are w1th us at this time), and add an Deputy Director and a Coordinator for Operations to our "fiscal agent" role. C. Why Chula vista. The united States Attorney's (USA) office approached Chula vista to act as the "fiscal agent" based on a number of factors. First, the USA felt it was imperative that a participating entity act as the CBAG fiscal agent. Second, the city of Chula vista was one of the only a~encies participating in CBAG which met all of the USA's eligibility cr1teria and was, therefore, the first choice to serve CBAG as its fiscal agent for the additional two CBAG positions. III. SUB-ITEM SPECIFIC DISCUSSION A. Ordinance Amending section 2.05.010 of the Chula vista Municipal Code to add two additional unclassified California Border Alliance Groul? fUll-time positions. Article VII, section 701(a) (7) enables the C1ty Council to create unclassified Service positions for "Persons employed to fill positions which have been created for work and/or projects funded entirely or in part by grants made to the city." Article VII, section 701(a) (8) requires that such positions be created by an Ordinance adopted by a 4/5ths vote of the City Council. Chapter 2.05.010 of the Municipal Code specifies the unclassified positions be established by the City Council. This section of the Municipal Code must be amended to reflect the inclusion of the proposed two additional CBAG positions. The two additional recommended employees will receive the benefit package prescribed for their representation unit. All direct costs born by the City of Chula vista in the employment of the two additional proposed positions will be reimbursed by the Department of Justice through the Executive Office for united States Attorneys and the City of San Diego. B. Resolution Approving an Agreement between the City of Chula vista and the united Sates Government by and through the Executive Offices of the United states Attorney for fiscal agent services. The proposed agreement will protect the City from potential liabilities that could arise from services performed by the CBAG executive and management staff. 9-~ Page 5, Item 9 Meeting Date 3.1y 8, [rp6 ~~1? C. Resolution Amending the Fringe Benefit Resolutions for Executives and Mid-Managers to include two additional California Border Alliance Group positions. This resolution will amend the Fringe Benefit Resolutions that specify the benefit package for the representation unit into which it is recommended that the two additional CBAG employees be placed. The proposed Resolution will add the two recommended CBAG positions to the employees specified to receive benefits, Executive classification for Deputy Director, and Mid-Manager classification for the Coordinator for OperationsjCBAG. D. Resolution accepting $22,950 of High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant funds through the united states Attorneys Office for administrative costs associated with the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG). This portion of the Resolution would reimburse the City for the salary of the CBAG Deputy Director until september 30, 1996, when the fund1ng source will be from HIDTA funds through the San Diego Police Department. 2) appropriating unanticipated grant revenues. This portion of the Resolution would provide the funds for the position. 3) amending the Fiscal Year 1996-97 budget to include total of 2.00 FTE positions subj ect to continued grant funding. This portion of the Resolution would provide for the changes needed to amend the number of positions in CBAG. E. Resolution Approving one Reimbursement Agreement and an Intergovernmental Personnel Assignment Agreement and amending the budget to appropriate the funds received under the Reimbursement Agreement to the Employee Expenses for the one additional employee, and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement,FY 1996-97. The Reimbursement Agreement (RA) is the Department of Justice offer to reimburse the city for what they term "contract employment" of the one additional position, Deputy Director until September 30, 1996. On October 1, 1996, the funding for Deputy Director would be from the grant through the MOU with the city of San Diego Police Department. The second new position, Coordinator for operationsjCBAG, would not take effect until January 1, 1997, and would be funded through the MOU with the City of San Diego Police Department. According to the United States Attorney, all five CBAG positions have an approximate funding expectancy of at least twenty-four months. The proposed Resolutions and Ordinances contain specific language conditioning the em~loyment of CBAG positions to federal funding through Department of JUst1ce and the Executive Office for united States Attorneys. Specifically, this proposed Resolution accepts the Department of Justice offer to reimburse the City for costs associated with the additional recommended CBAG positions subject to the cited time frames and conditions. The purposes of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act Agreement are to provide: 1) a mechanism for the City to loan employees to the Federal government; and, 2) complete indemnification by the Federal government to the City for all acts of those employees. f-f .-...---_.~----_.__._---_.- Page 6, Item 9 Meeting Date 3'lIly 9, !!III' ~~h?- F. Resolution Accepting $61,709 of High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant Funds to the Chu1a vista Police Department, administered by the Master Fiscal Agent San Diego Police Department for the other agencies per the Memorandum of Understanding with the other cities to extend the two ,Positions previously approved by Council December 5, 1995. The portlon of the resolution continues to provide salary reimbursement for the two current CBAG employees, Executive Director and Secretary, to become effective July 1, 1996, for FY 1996-97, via the Master Fiscal Agent. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the staff recommendation will result in the appropriation of $22,950, in the amount specified in Resolution D, for the purpose of creating two new unclassified positions, and the extension of two CBAG support staff, which provide professional administrative support of the California Border Alliance Group. The Reimbursement Agreements tendered by the Department of Justice will provide for reimbursement of all City expenditures related to the two additional positions and approximately $436.00 (2%) in processing cost charges to the City. Based on anticipated expenses, net fiscal impact is + $436.00, in new revenue to the city. The City presently receives the 2% ($1,234) processing costs from the $61,709 listed in Resolution F above. The total net impact of extending two positions and adding two positions to CBAG, is + $1,670 in revenue to the General Fund. 9'~ . ORDINANCE NO. .2.6 ð"'/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING SECTION 2.05.010 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL UNCLASSIFIED CALIFORNIA BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP FULL-TIME POSITIONS SECTION I: That section 2.05.010 of the Chula vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.05.010 Unclassified positions established. In addition to those unclassified positions specifically delineated in section 500 of the Charter of the City, there are established the unclassified positions entitled deputy city manager, assistant to the city manager, deputy city clerk, assistant fire chief, assistant director of planning, assistant director of finance, assistant director of personnel, assistant director of building and housing, city engineer, director of management services and information services, redevelopment coordinator, housing coordinator, transit coordinator, assistant director of community development, deputy director of public works/city engineer, public information coordinator, traffic engineer, deputy director of public works/operations, budget manager, revenue manager, assistant director of management services and information services, assistant library director, police captain, special planning projects manager, assistant to the Mayor and council, border environmental business cluster manager and administrative assistant/office manager, ftRà California Border Alliance Group executive director, california Border Alliance Group analyst ftRà California Border Alliance Group secretary. California Border Alliance Group deputv executive director and California Border Alliance Group coordinator for operations/intelliqence policv, plans and proqram. SECTION II: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect upon its second reading and adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by Richard Emerson, Chief of An~~oor:1. ~ Police Attorney c: \or\205010 9/9-/ RESOLUTION NO. JJI.J¿,tJ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT BY AND THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR FISCAL AGENT SERVICES WHEREAS, the united States Attorney's Office - Southern District of California (USA), a division of the united States Department of Justice (DOJ) , has received federal funding to implement the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG)¡ and WHEREAS, the united States Attorney's office sought and received additional federal funding to hire a total of five full- time administrative and managerial support personnel: an Executive Director, an Analyst, a Secretary, and add a Deputy Director and a Coordinator for Operations to our "fiscal agent" role.' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve an Agreement between the City of Chula vista and the united States Government by and through the Executive Offices of the united States Attorney for fiscal agent services, a copy of which is on file in the office of the city Clerk as Document No. . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista. Presented by Approved as to form by (>-----. ~ ìV\ Å~~ Richard P. Emerson, Chief of Ann Y. Moor, Interim City of Police Attorney 913-/ --.-- . ..-- . _._,~'".- THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1996, for the purpose of reference only and effective as of the date last executed by the parties is between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a Chartered municipal corporation of the State of Califomia and THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, U. S. Department of Justice, United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Califomia, and is made with reference to the following facts: WHEREAS, the United States Attomey's Office is the "Lead Agency" for the Califomia Border Alliance Group (CBAG) Executive Committee Support Unit and said Unit has four authorized positions. CBAG provides drug interdiction services in high intensity drug trafficking areas such as is within the South Bay portion of the County of San Diego, and WHEREAS, these four positions are authorized by the Office of National Drug Control Policy, to provide support to the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) Executive Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree: I. Upon receiving appropriate funds, the City will provide Fiscal Agent services in the form of salaries, benefits and related items for the Califomia Border Alliance Group (CBAG) Executive Committee Support Unit. 2. The United States Attomey's Office agrees that as consideration for the City acting as a fiscal agent in this matter, the City is entitles to receive two percent (2%) of the total amount of funds processed by Chula Vista for providing the fiscal agent services herein specified. 3. Nothing herein is intended and both parties agree that incumbents of the CBAG positions will not provide the City with employment or professional services other than for CBAG purposes, and are not an employees or independent contractors for the city. 4. The United States Government, Department of Justice, agrees to defend the City of Chula Vista without regard to contributory negligence ,and to indemnify and hold the city, and each of its officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, and other proceedings arising from that defense, to include, but not limited to payment of Workman's Compensation claims, and alleged torts and related claims associated with the official actions of the incumbents of the aforementioned CBAG positions. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Mayor of the City ofChula Vista ALAN D. BERSIN United States Attomey ATTEST City Clerk Approved as to form by CIv- "¡I...k-\.~ City Attomey 9ð,,;¡.. -~--_._- --...- , ..-- - ---.---., ,--- RESOLUTION NO. J /rJÚ / RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FRINGE BENEFIT RESOLUTION FOR EXECUTIVES AND MID-MANAGERS TO INCLUDE TWO ADDITIONAL CALIFORNIA BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP FULL-TIME POSITIONS WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the Fringe Benefit Resolution for Executives and Mid-Managers to include two California Border Alliance Group full-time positions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby amend the Fringe Benefit Resolution for Executives and Mid-Managers to include the California Border Alliance Group Deputy Executive Director and California Border Alliance Group Coordinator for Operations/Intelligence Policy, Plans and Program as set forth in Attachment 1 and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. Presented by Approved as to form by Richard Emerson, Chief of ~l1~~<). Ann Y. Moore, Interim City Police Attorney C:\rs\cbag.FB 9C'! ____...__._~_u~__..~______m_ __~,,__m..____~__ _~___,_ ATTACHMENT 1 EXECUTIVE, MIDDLE MANAGEMENT AND UNREPRESENTED FRINGE BENEFIT COMPENSATION FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 I. EXECUTIVE GROUP A. Membership City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Assistant City Attorney Assistant City Attorney/Chief Litigator Assistant City Manager Assistant to the City Manager Assistant Director of Building & Housing Assistant Director of Community Development Assistant Director of Finance Assistant Director of Management and Information Services Assistant Director of Personnel Assistant Director of Planning Assistant Library Director Budget Manager California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) Executive Director CBAG Deputy Executive Director (UC) Chief of Police Deputy City Manager Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Deputy Director of Public Works/Operations Director of Building and Housing Director of Community Development Director of Finance Director of Management and Information Services Director of Parks and Recreation Director of Personnel Director of Planning Director of Public Works Executive Director, Nature Interpretive Center Fire Chief Library Director Police Captain Revenue Manager Special Planning Projects Manager Special Projects Manager 9C.,;J .'·'i ---- --.-- MIDDLE MANAGEMENT FRINGE BENEFIT COMPENSATION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 II. MIDDLE MANAGEMENT GROUP A. Membership Animal Control Manager Assistant to Mayor and City Council (UC) Assistant Transit Coordinator Battalion Chief Border Environmental Business Cluster Manager Border Environmental Commerce Alliance Director Building Projects Supervisor Building Services Superintendent Business Office Manager CBAG Executive Director (UC) CBAG Coordinator for Operations (eft. 1/1/97) (UC) Collections Supervisor Communications Systems Manager Computer Operations Manager Conservation Coordinator Crime Analysis Manager Crime Laboratory Manager Deputy City Attorney (UC) Deputy City Clerk Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation Economic Development Manager (UC) Emergency Management Coordinator Environmental Projects Manager Environmental Resource Manager Environmental Review Coordinator Fire Marshal Fleet Manager Geographic Information Systems Manager Housing Coordinator (UC) Landscape Architect Library Automation Manager Micro Computer Specialist Open Space Coordinator . Principal Community Development Specialist Principal Librarian Principal Management Assistant Principal Personnel Analyst Principal Planner Public Information Coordinator (UC) Public Works Maintenance Superintendent Purchasing Agent (UC) Redevelopment Coordinator (UC) 9c-J( Risk Manager RESOLUTION NO. JY..:lI,;¡'" RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING $22,950 OF HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) GRANT FUNDS THROUGH THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CALIFORNIA BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP (CBAG), APPROPRIATING UNANTICIPATED GRANT REVENUES IN THE GENERAL FUND, AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 BUDGET TO INCLUDE A TOTAL OF 2.00 FTE POSITIONS SUBJECT TO CONTINUED GRANT FUNDING WHEREAS, it is necessary to reimburse the city for the salary of the CBAG Deputy Director until September 30, 1996, when the funding source will be from HIDTA funds through the San Diego Police Department; and WHEREAS, a new second position, Coordinator for operations CBAG, will not take effect until January 1, 1997 and will be funded at that time through a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of San Diego Police Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby accept $22,950 of High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) grant funds through the United States Attorneys Office for administrative costs associated with the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city Council does hereby appropriate unanticipated grant revenues to the General Fund and amend the fiscal year 1996-97 budget to include a total of 2.00 FTE positions subject to continued grant funding. Presented by Approved as to form by (" Á.J-- '1 ìV1.ßtJ.-Sl- Richard P. Emerson, Chief of Ann Y. Moore, Interim City of Police Attorney Cj}) ~ I ..--, ..~._m_._.___~_ __~.._.._m.__ RESOLUTION NO. JIJ'.J¿ J RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT AND PERSONNEL ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT, AND AMENDING THE BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE THE FUNDS RECEIVED UNDER THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT TO THE EMPLOYEE EXPENSES FOR THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR POSITION, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENTS, FY 1996-97 WHEREAS, the Reimbursement Agreement is the Department of Justice offer to reimburse the city for what they term "contract employment" of the one additional position, Deputy Director until September 30, 1996; and WHEREAS, on October 1, 1996, the funding for Deputy Director would be from the grant through the MOU with the City of San Diego Police Department; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Personnel Agreement is to provide a mechanism for the temporary assignment of parties pursuant to the Intergovernmental Personnel Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Reimbursement Agreement, and Personnel Agreement, copies of which are on file in the office of the city Clerk as Document Nos. . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the city council does hereby amend the budget to appropriate the funds received under the Reimbursement Agreement to Fund #100-1094. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreements for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista. Presented by Approved as to form by a~~~ Richard P. Emerson, Chief of Ann Y. Moor, Interlm Clty Police Attorney C:\rs\cbag1 JUN 13 '96 07:50AM USA 0 SAN DIEGO! P.2 U.S. Department or Justice Refmburæmeat Agteeme4t Bd...eed Agencies Provider Cost Center Customer Number Customer Alias 5-15010004 Provider Contact hone Customer Contact Phone Captain Dan Wolf (619) 691-5262 Jane Duarte, 619/557-6476 udget Officer ame ame (if bilüog address is different, specity on reverse side.) City of Chula Vista, Chula Vista Police ffice of the United States Attorney epartment ddress 276 4th Avenue Street, Room ity Chula Vista Ir ~~ .,.;,~ ,.,.:~~,~,: . :;.,.~;~~,' " ,it! aplanotion of work or ltrvic.. to be performed aN1 basis for dettrmining cost: The United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of California, agrees to reimburse the City of Chula vista, Chula Vista Police Department, for contract employment of the Deputy irector, Chief Budget/Fiscal Officer for the California Border Alliance Administration HIDTA. Salary and benefits are estimated as follows: $18,000 4,500 fee (2t) 450 $22,950 will be monthly based on actual expenses. Elümated amount $22,950 (Sit "vers. sid. of form.) Approved for Provider Office: Approved for Customer Office: rganlnüon ity of Chula Vista, Chula Vista police the United States Attorney epartment ignature BERSIN City of Chula Vista Attorney FORM 001-216 9E'3C>f-j- OCTOBER 1993 _·u..,._..__~. __. __.__"__.~___.~ OF It (A.v. 2·'11) ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT l'.S. Office of P.rIOftne'ÞMtIzg.m.f"Il FPM C/ltPltr 334 Title IV of the Intergovernmental Peraonnel Act of 1970 (5 U,S,C, 3371 . 3376) INSTRUCTIONS This agreement constitutes the wr~Ian racord of the obligations Within 30 days of Ihe elleClive dale of Iha asslgnmenl, two and responsibilities of tha parties to a lemporary assignment copies of this form mu.t be .ent to: arranged under the provisions of the Inlergovernmenter U.S. Office of Peraonnel Managament Personnel Act of 1970. Pereonne! Mobility Ptogram SIalling Opera!Ï9n. Divi.ionICEG The lerm ·Slale or IQÇal governmen.," When appearing on Ihie '900 E Slreel, NW form. also "fors to an Institution of higher education, an Indian Washington, D.C. 20"'5 tribal government, end eny other eligibre organization. Procedural que.tlons on completing the assignment agreement form or on other aspects relating 10 the mobility program Copies of Ihe completed and signed agreemenl should be should b. addres..d 10 .ilher mobility program coordlnl1ors In each Federal agincy or 10 Ih. elall of the Per.onnel Mobility retained by each signatory. Programs In Iha U.S. Office of Personne' Management. .' PART ',,0 NATURE OF THE ASSlGNMENTAGREEMENT'':'::''~ è""-""',;~".,, ..,.--;:"-.,"-'~ ·.··c.o.'. >.,.. :".:~.::, :. "".:0.:.; ::::~c,:_· :¡. '7"; ~;:..,.^": 1. Check Appropriate Box . . . . 2. Name (Les~ First, Middl.) PAPANIA, RONALD N. 4. Home Addre.. (Sir.." City, S,.,., ZIP Code) 4027 Ria" Circle San Diego CA 92124 &, Federal Agency (Ust otllce, bureau ororganizaUOt1alunll which i, party 10 7. State or Local Government (ld8tldfy the govemmentat agency) the egr..m.nl¡ Dept of Justice/Office of the U.S. Attorney Vista Police Department 8.ls assignment being madelhrough a tac:ultt rellows program? X NO U"YES", give name of the program. PARt4~POsmONDATA~"":::;::'::=¿'-:----=~'~""'--::;::::."=-S=-~~-:-:":;;--"=-"'== A. POlltlon Currently Held g, Employment OfllGe Name and Address (5""et, Ciry. Stats and ZIP Code) 10. Employ..·.·Po.ltion Title 1'. Office Telephone Number San Diego District Attorney I B Office ,.. Deputy Direetor (Includ. the Area Cod.) JJO West Broadway, Suite 1300 Budnet & Fiscal 619-557-5324 (x14) San Diego. CA 92101 12. Immediate Supervisor (Nam. and Tille) Terry Smith, Executive Director B . Tv.e of Currant Appolnlmenl 13. Feeleral Employ". (Check epptØprlare box.) . 14. Stale and Local Employee. B CortlrCompetitive Glade Level State Of Local Annual Salary Original Data Employed by the Stale or Local Clowmment (Month, O,y. Other (Specify): V..r) ~6.9. 207 12-23-95 c· Po.ltlon To Which Ass¡gnment W111 Be Meda - 15. Employment OWce Name and Addre.. (Stree~ Cirr, Stals and ZIP Cork) 1&. As'Ignee', Po.ltlon Title 17. Office Telephone Number DOJ/Office of the U.S. Attorney Deputy Director (Include the Arte Code) eeo Front Street, Rm 6293 Budget & Fiseal 619-557-5324 (x14) San Diego CA 92101-8893 18.lmmeeliate Supervisor (/oIem.end ¡ I.) Terry Smith ~xecutive Direetor P,'vlouledltlon Is usablt &069·105 .....- 9£0 /<' 2'd iO~3Ia N~S 0 ~ 5 n W~8Ë:6Ø 96, Ë1 Nnr "- -"---^ PART 5;' TYPE OF ASSIGNMENT, ,. ~",~~~::::--.è'~, :::,",,;"2:,...:, ; ~,~ .:..:::.. _.~, , . 0' ,~. 0'; ; ."c:·,.. :., - - -. ,~- . ,- "" --', >- , ' '" . ~. , . 19. Check Appropriate Bo... 20, Petlod of Aa.lgnmenl (Monlh. Oq. y.at) 011 detail from a Federalagonoy ',om T. On leave without pay Irom a F.deralagoncy two years X On detail'" a Foderalagency On a Inlmen!ln a Federal a en " . , o . 0: 21, Indlcat. th. roasono ro, Ibi. mobilily a..lgnm.nt and ".cu.s how. the w.or1< wnl b.neflt th. pardc:ipa~ng gOll8rrvn.nls. In addition, Indicate how"'. omploy.. will be uUllzed at the comøle~on 011111. a..lgnmonl -- To enhance the combined efforts of local, state, and Federal government to provide effective law enforcement to the citizens of San Diego and Imperial Counties, and enhance the war on drugs and violence. 22. U.I tho major dutia. and r8.pon.lblli~e. to be per10rmed while on the mobllil)' ...Ignmenl The Deputy Director of Budget and Fiscal is responsible for the financial management of HIDTA funds for planning, programming, budgeting, internal auditing, and reporting. Develops grant programs; prepares, submits, adm1nis~ers, and implements·gran~s. 24, SpedaJ Pay Condi~ono (Indic.'. any tot dIllons that could IlItfeas.th. '"lønod .mployee» compeIV.Oon during th. .../gnm.n' period) 07 None 25. l.avo Provisions (Indicate th. 'Muat and sick ~av. bøn.nts for wh/th th. auløn.d .mploy" /. "igible. Sp.clly th. procedure. forrepotllng. fltIU.dng .nd fltørdlng.uch /eaYe.) Subject to annual and sick leave benefits provided by parent agency to which he will comply . , Page 2 9E-t ...~ E'd iO~3Ia N~S 0 ~ 5 n W~6E:6Ø 96, Et Nnr --...-.--,,-" -. -.-."-.....--- -" _._----~.~...__..- - PART 9· RSCAL OBlIGATlONS·-:;:"·'... - c' :·",,:~H:_:.":" ;:-"'-:--~:''"':--' ;~""':H~::":' :...:::::'," .'.c' '.:..'" .: ",.". ._ .:;, C ,,~_. .C .. Id.nU wh.r.. ro riale the omee 10 which invol... and time and a"endance rtcCrds .hould ba sent. 26. Federal Ag.ncy Obngadons (It paying mo,. than 5() p.rc.nt 01. FetJ.ral 27. State or Local Government Agency Obllgadonl employ..·. ..,ary beyond a 6-month period, apec/ty ra~ona/elor..,.t· sharing dodrlon.} Federal'High Intènsity Drug Trafficking Benefits and B~lary to be paid by Chula Area (HIDTA) or other Federal funds will Vista Police Department reimburse salary and benefits to Chula vista Police Department. .' PART 10 ·'CONFlICTS OF INTERESTANO EMPLOYEE CONDUCT·,.,·~~'-:'~~':..:~ :H~ : -:z:> ,', . .. - ,~, '" ~ < . -- , > , ... > ~, ' tEl 28, Applicable Federal, Slate or local connicl-or·lnl.r..t Iawl hive baen ravlewed with tile employ.. to auura thaI contlict-or· ntereluiluationo do not Inadvertentiy arl.e during thl. a.llgnment. .ffi 211, The employea hal baen noUned 0' lawI. rul.. and r.gulalion.. and pollclel on employee conduct which apply to himlher whll. on thilalsignm.nl PARL11'';OPTlONSõ':-:'':::';;':.-;::C-:-::-::H-::';;'-::''''3'.'':'~ ...;",,·,,'2 """,..".,:~.."... ESe'; ",...o.':..._.,,"~"~::::. '::::':' ,:. ,'''. :..,.' .'>:_ :.. ~ : .c.'~ ..- " 30. Indicate .overage uN/A", if not applicable 31. Slate or Local Agency Bensnll (Indlc.afs all ~Is emptoyse Hnatllo thaI A. Fadøral Employees Group Uf.lnluranc8 wi" b. ,.~/ned by th. St.te CI' IøgJ .ø-fJr:y employ.. being ua/gnsd to . Feclaræ agsncy. ~ Includ.. slll'-m.n' .,rfjfylng cøvereg. In an Stals .nd /øcal smployes bend! prØ(¡ratrls fhalOf. .Iocted by the F.d- B. Federal Civil SeNice Retirement System or Federal Employees Ifel employe. on leev. without pay frøm ,hs Fedsral JI(J.ncy to. 51.1. Redl8lllont Sy¡tem CI' /ocaI.g.nr:y.) Covered NIA C, Federal Employee Health Benefits " 32. Oth.r Benents {indi..!s any other employes ben.fitl to be macla part 01 this .gtll,m.nQ It ,h ~nderlltood ~hat Hr. Papania is covered under Chapter 73 of 5 use (au~t.b~litYr eecur~tYr conduct), Chapter 81 of 5 use (workers' oampena.ticn) and 28 use 2671-2680 (tort claimsr aexual haraaament, BBO). Oertai~ miacellanecua expense a may be provided aa individually authori.ed by the U 8 Attorney Office in accordance with aeparate "Reimbursement Agoreement B t . . Agoenoiea, Form DOJ-2l6". ...._...... e ween PART 12 -''l'RAVELAND TRANSPORT A ON EXPENSES 'AND ALLOWANCES "__~',~;=; ~.~. ::.., ,:::."'- ,-.;" ',C: -C'. .;~o,' ,',,:: ;c .:.... 33.lndlcalo: (1) Whether the Foderal agency or Slate or locaI.g.ncy will pay travel and tranlportolion expenlel to, Irom, and during the alOignment u spe<:lfIod in Chapter 3340' the Federal Perlonnel Manual. and (2) which travel and relocalion .xpen... win belnduded. Official busine&s travel expenses. authorized in advance ~y the U.S. Attorney's office, - will be paid by Federal government. No relocation expens~s authorized~ Page 3 9£-7 þ'd iO~3Ia N~S 0 ~ 5 n W~6E:6Ø 96. n NIlf I ìI'·~¡'-¡~_'~--:':------.:-:.:E-· ..= o A. The rule. ond policie. governing the Internal operadon ond monagement o D. I have been Inlormed of oppllcable provisions should my . of the agency to which my assignment Is made under this agreement will be po.l~on with my permanent employer beçome lubject to a ob.erved by me. redudion·jn·force procedure. o B. I hive been Informed that my ..signment may be terminated at eny o E. lagre. to servo In the Civil Service upon the cempledon 01 .. Ume at the opdon of the Federal agency or the Stlte or local Qovernment o C. I havI been Informed th,at any travel and transportation expenles covered my assignment for a period equal to that of my assIgnment. fram Federal8gency appropriations may be rvc:cwrabkl as a debt due the Should t fall to ..rve the required Ume, I have been Informed Uniled States, ill do not .erv. until the complerion of my ...ignm.nt (unle.. that I will be liable to the Uniled Slate. for o"expen..s terminated earlier by either employer) or one year, whichever Îlshorter. (except salary) 01 my assignment (Fo, Fede,81employee. only) ~- .~=¡-!,!,'-¡¡-.~-~; t·!·!-,-C,....:;-·(-í~~·I·,, LI-¡:}::_.:"'i.....~;~-;-~-~_J;;~'-"\-~--~.--·_..¡-i.¡-_.·."-.~__-~-,:-::-I·._~·~"~i.=~;^!i:_=:~_~ In signing this agreement, I cer1l1y that I understand Ihelerms of this agreement and agree to the rules, regulations and policies as indicated in Part 13 above. 35. I.<>eatlon of Assignment (Nome o( Orpenizelion) 36. Dale (Month, Day, Year) Dept, of Justice/Office of the U. S. Attorney From T. San Die o. CA 37. Signature of Assigned Employee 38. Date of Signa lure (Month, Day. Yea,) '" PART,1S::iCERTlFICAl1ON OF APPROVINGOff ClALS-:-::=.'.Ëi:£;;=,"S;:;S::-*:'2;-=~~_'"""i:..-zs;;.£-"€~~~~ In signing this agreement, We certify that: - the description of duties and responsibilities is ~rrent ond fully and aa:urately describes thosa of the a88igned employee: - this assignment Is being entered Into 10 serve a sound, mufua' public purpose and not solely for tha smployee's benefit; - at the completion of the assignment. the par1icipating employee will be rsturned to the position he or sha occupied at the time this agreement was entered Into or a position of like seniority, stalul and pay. Slate or locer Government Agenoy Federsl Agency 3g. Signature 01 Authorizing OHloe, .0. Slgnetu," of Authortzlng Officer 41. Date of Signature (Month, Day, Yesr) .2. Dalo 01 Signature (Mon/h, uey, roar) ~3. Typed Name ond Title .~. Typed Nome and Title PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Sections 3373 and 3374, Assignment of Empioyee, To or agencies, or by State, local, or Federal income taxing From State or Local Governments, of Trtle 5, U.S. Cede. agencies. authorizes ColleC1lon of this information. The data will be uled primarily to formally document and reccrd your tamporary Solicitation of your Social Securay Number (SSN) i. authorized assignment to or from a State or local government, Institution by Executive Order Q397, which permitted uee of the SSN as of higher education, Indian tribal government, er ether eligible an Identifier ef individual recerds maintained by Federal erganlzatlon. This information may al.e bÞ used as the legal agencies. Furnishing yeur SSN er any ether data requested Is basis for persennel and financialtransactiens, te identify yeu volunlary. Hewever, failure te prcvide any ef the requested when requesting ¡nfennallon about you. e.g., frem prier information may result in your being ineligible for participatien emp eyera, educatienal Institutions, or law enforcement in the Intergovernmental Assignment Program. Page 4 9£-7' ,..0# 0'U.s. GOVERNMENT PFIiIJrrlf'1NO OFFtC&.: '''~9A S'd iO~3Ia N~5 0 ~ 5 n W~ØÞ:6Ø 96. E! Nnr RESOLUTION NO. JY.2¿'/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING $61,709 OF HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) GRANT FUNDS TO THE CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADMINISTERED BY THE MASTER FISCAL AGENT SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE OTHER AGENCIES PER THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE OTHER CITIES TO EXTEND THE TWo CBAG POSITIONS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DECEMBER 5, 1995 WHEREAS, on september 5, 1995, City council approved the City of Chula vista to act as the "fiscal agent" for the California Border Alliance Group and act as conduit to obtain civilian support personnel and to acquire related supplies and services; and WHEREAS, CBAG is funded through a "High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area" supplemental funding provision contained in the Federal Appropriations Act for each federal fiscal year from 1988 to 1996; the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988; and the National Drug Control Strategy of 1990; and WHEREAS, San Diego and Imperial Counties have been designated as a HIDTA area due to the volume of illegal narcotics entering the united States through the international border frontier; and WHEREAS, the City of San Diego, through the Police Department, is the Master Fiscal Agent for the area fiscal agent approved cities and receives an annual allocation of HIDTA funding by making application to the Department of Justice prior to each federal fiscal year which application reflects the personnel and non-personnel costs for each agency expected to participate in CBAG during the next federal fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the funding available in the amount of $61,709 is to provide salary reimbursement for the two current CBAG employees, Executive Director and Secretary, to become effective July 1, 1996 for FY 1996-97, via the Master Fiscal Agent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby accept $61,709 of High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Grant funds to the Chula vista Police Department, administered by the master Fiscal Agent San Diego Police Department for the other agencies per the Memorandum of Understanding with the other cities to extend the two CBAG positions previously approved December 5, 1995. Presented by Approved as to form by Richard P. Emerson, Chief of Ú ~ , ~ ïVt~ Ann Y. Moore, Interim city Police Attorney 9~" I , ,\ ~ ~: ( ----. ~.._.._. ~ ~~~ d/7 ATTACHMENT "Au CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SUBMITTAL FORM ITo be submitted bv noon. the Thursdav two weeks orior to Council Meetino) (one form ocr item) FOR MEETING DATE: Scot. 5. 1995 Submitted by: Chief of Police VExt: 5144 FOR PLACEMENT: (check one) X Action Items _ Council Comments : " - = TITLE: (as it will appear on A-113 -- be brief A. Ordinance Amending Section 2.05.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code to add three unclassilied California Border Alliance Group full-time positions. B. Resolution Amending the Fringe Benefit Resolution for Middle Managers and Unrepresented Employees to include three California Border Alliance Group Positions. C. Resolution Approving two identical United States Department of Justice Reimbursement Agreements between the City of Chula Vista and the Executive Ollice for United States Attorneys. D. Resolution Approving an Agreement for Professional Services between the City 01 Chula Vista and Dennis M. Kenneally, Executive Director, California Border Alliance Group. E. Resolution Amending the FY 1995-96 Police Department Grant Funds -- Operation Alliance (219-2193) to reflect $140,990 in additional expenses required to support three full-time, reimbursable, California Border Alliance Group positions; and, appropriating and transferring funds therefor. SUMMARY: The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has received funding through a variety of federal appropriations to implement the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG). CBAG is one of several regional eflorts being implemented nationwide by the DOJ to decrease drug trallicking along the international border with Mexico. Local and state law enforcement agencies that have chosen to assign sworn officers to CBAG, including Chula Vista, are reimbursed by the Department of Justice for the full cost of their participation in CBAG. The legislation authorizing funding for CBAG requires the United States Attorney to identify local "fiscal agents" to act as a conduit to obtain civilian support personnel 'and to acquire related supplies and services. This policy is designed to provide an enhanced level of national security while maintaining current federal responsibilities and not increasing the size of the full- time federal work force. The United States Attorney for the Southern District of California. Mr Alan Bersin, requested that Chula Vista act as the "fiscal agent" for CBAG. The proposed ordinance and resolutions would enable Chula Vista to act in this capacity, result in the full reimbursement of all expenditures by the City in support of CBAG and compensate the City at the rate of 2% of expenditures for processing costs. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed Ordinance and Resolutions. The staff recommendation will: 1) create 3.0 Unclassified CBAG positions; 2) provide for the City to be reimbursed for all expenses associated with hiring these CBAG positions including a nominal processing cost reimbursement; 3) make payments to the CBAG Executive Director for services rendered from May 1, 1995, to August 31, 1995; and,'4) make appropriate technical adjustments to the Police Department's Grant Fund budget to support these actions. A step Salary Retirmnt Benefits Medicare Total % of Ben Exec Dir $65,728 $9,831 $7,003 $953 $83,515 27.06% Analyst $27,957 $4,195 $5,783 $405 $38,340 37.14% Secy $28,047 $4,209 $2,410 $407 $35,073 25.05% Estep ~~ - Salary Retirmnt Benefits Medicare Total % of Ben Exec Dir $79,893 $11,944 $7,170 $1,158 $100,165 25.37% Analyst $33,981 $5,094 $5,854 $493 $45,422 33.67% Secy $34,090 $5,110 $2,440 $494 542,134 23.60% Budaet Amendment Fund 219 Division 2193 - Operalion Alliance - Execulive Director - CBAG Obiect Account Amounl Proposed Use 5101 77 000 Funded Salaries 5106 200 Executive Car Allowance 5141 11512 Funded Relirement , 5142 7006 Funded Flexitile Benefils = ,- 5143 1117 Funded Medicare 5201 Funded Professional Services 5398 Funded Computer and Telephone Eauipment 5566 Funded OHice Furniture Tolal 96,835 Total Anlicipated Reimbursable Expenses CITY OF CHULA VISTA REO. NO OE..-r. REQUEST FOR PERSONNEL 7112 DIY, t. POSITION TiTlE AND CODE l. No. EMP\,. REO, 3. DATE 1'0 eeCIN A. REQUEST CBAG Analyst 1 ASAP ". DURATION OF EMPlOYMENT S. .. o P!EAMAN!NT :: HOURlY o REC. PAYROll ð FULL TIME .:: TEMPORARY UNTIL .:: OTHER = PAIn TIME NO. HAS.IWI(. I , 1.IF REPlACEMENT; NAME OF EMPlOYEE B£INO REPLACED DATe VACANCY OCCURS REASON: = RESIGNED = DISCHARCED .:: PROMOTED = DEMOTeD ~ TRANSFERRED : OTHER '.IF SUBSTITUTE; NAME OF EMPLOYEE ON LEAVE LE......e ENDS APPROXIMATEl'l' TYPE OF LEAVE; = INJURY û SICK C MilITARY = ~ ANNUAL = orHER '.,. POSiTION BUDCETED _ ACCOUNT NO. 10. IY, ~S" , :: OTHER (EXPlAIN} 219-2193 REOUESTED 8'( DATE Richard P. Emerson, Chief 11. REMARKS This is a federally funded, off-site, California Border Alliance Group. Anal osition. We are the fiscal a ent for thå:s osition. Contact Person: Bryan Treul, ext. 5336 B. APPROVAL FOR FILLING VACANCY ¡l-if. '9~ DATE C. CERTIFICATION ero 8E COMPLETED BY PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT} H ADDRESS TEL. NO, PAY RATE DID ElIG/BLE REPORT/WAIVE CERTIFIED 8Y DATE D. DEPARTMENT HEAD RECOMMENDED APPOINTMENT (MEorCAL CLEARANCE IS REQUIRED BEFORE APPOINTMENT. IF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT. USE THIS SeCTION. NO CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.) NAME AND ADDRESS PROPOSED DATE TO START WORK REOUESTeO PAY RATE. JENNIFER HALL JAN 8 1996 A STEP 1154 PACIFIC BEACH DR. #2 SAN DIEGO CA 92109 E. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT j2-(_]-'ìÎ DATE "IF OTHER THAN STeP A OR THAT SHOWN IN CERTIFICATION ArrACH MEM UESTlNG AUTHORIZATION, P~RS 122 {3-U¡ RETURN COMPLETe FORM TO P!õRSONNEL FROMa 50HZH RMRlVflCRl UHlf 'AMI,., "'-"Z6 he-D'-" Two 16. 34 \!'~!. D' . '- .. JENNIFER .H. HALL ~ " ~ '-\ 1154 Pacific Beach Drive ff2 ~ SM Diego, CA 92J09 t..\ (619) 274-5771 -'. " -. EDUCA TION , Connecticut Colle¡:e. New London, CT (Fall 1988 _ Jr¡¡)l J99J) Bachofnr of Arts in Child Development; minor in AnthropoJoS)'; GrA 3.46 DOM'S Lis! 011 semesters; Grndll~ti:d CIUII laut/to and wilh DiS1inction in Mnjor. .JJ!.>i:.;;¡¡/Ý .oi·S~,::niègo ·L¡"vi~r.; 'bSí.tru.i.P\'~~-;' (S¡¡Íiu~ ]~~3j. . , .: ' : ~ '. .. .. . .: \ ,'. . . AII"terican Bar Assqciation.approv~!1 PAPilc!:Al Ce~rilic~(e.' . '.,' .. . , Specialized in Genetai Litigation. Gi.dunlod with Ho~ors. - - " · EXP.ERIEN CE Sheliff's })ep",1menl, SAn Die!:o, California (August 1994 _ pl1:senl) IrrvesfiCfllive SpecinIl.<t: Assigned to Homicide Detail. Maintain, organiz. and update Dotnil's databases. Prep"re repons, statistic, anù queries. Handle miscellancous inquiries from Iho general public. Communicnlc cfTectively with fedoral, state Md loccl Jaw enforcement ngeneies. Assist Detoctivos in investigAtions of Homicide and Missing Persons Casas. Respond to crime sccncs with Homicide InvostigaJion Teams. Research suspects, victims and witnesses through eomputor search os of federnl, stato and loco! records. Ohtwn dDculDonts, statements, records and other facts from various agencies. Office of tho Disf1iet Attonloy, SAn PieGo, Califomia (.JWIO 1993 _ Augl13t 1994) Pnrn],:gaJ: Assigned to Mnjor Nareo!ies Unit. Drafu,d logal documents for attorney review including: discovery. motions, responses and stipulations. Gathered, IlDnlyzed and organized docurncnfcuy evidence. S\lmmi\rizc.d discovory responses. Ro.<caJ"ehed le[;hl I i""ues. Organized files nnd tickled dendlines. Coordinated auction of various forfeited , proporry. Sllrcr\"i~ed pr.mlo¿¡:,1 intern. Co:r.",uJ1i«tcd effectivoly with federa:, state OJ1d , local Jaw enforeemeJ1t, nttorneys. in pro pcr claimants, court personnel, and general puhlic. i AHemSt(e Public Derender's Office, SRn Diego, California (Spline 1993) LeIJal I,tlermhip: Assigned to Juvenile Department. Organized case files. Researched logal k<ue.s. Contacted clients nnd soeinl workers for progress reports on reunification pIMS. a,ild Development S.,yice" Moehi.s, Muine (Summcr 1991) Cum'¡ú/tll/t ln1crm"ltip: Researched 1he process of early intervention to children with special needs through interviews IU1d litcrawre. Developed Md produced public relations informationnl brochures FDr IDeal corly iJ11nrvcntion sitcs based on f(,soarch. , COMPUTEn SJ<JLLS Paradox, WordPerfect, Excel, ARJIS, SUN REFERENCES A VAILABLIt UVON REQUEST ___+._u. FROfta 5DHIH ANALYTICAL UHIT FAX' 61' "''''''Z6 D.c-""'" Tw. 16133 'AIJ£a e: . . , ,. . ") 1164 Padfic Beach Dr. #2 San Diego, CA 92109 October 17, 1995 Ms. Jocelyn Kircher San Dlegollmperlal County Regional Narcotic (nfonnalion Network 402 W 35th Street National City. CA 91950 : :- = - Dear Ms. Kircher, , I am writing to apply for tha Intelligence Analyst posilion currently available In the Anti. Violent Crime InltiaUve Gang Uni!. As my resume shows, I havo worked In the law enforcement field for the past several years, both in the District Attorney's Office and the Sheriffs Department. In my present position as an Investigative SpecleUst for the Sheriff's Homicide Detail, my duties include the maintenance, up9rade and organization of the Detail's various databases. On a daily basis, I Input Infonnation regarding all homicide$, missing persons, ) death Investigations, attempt suicides and accidental shootings tracked by this Detail. I output this information In the form of queries, statistics, Bnd reports necessary for Invesllgetlons, quarterly reports, and other inquiries. Addilionally, I compile case synopses for use In various reports, committee reviews and subpoenas. This position requIres that I possess superior organizational skills, advanced computer skillS, excellent written and verbal skills, end en understanding of confidential and sensitive information. Further, my current position requires a strong ability to effectively communicate with Jaw enforcement, the general public, and, In particular, my collea·gues. 1 As my enclosed resume indiCðtos, I possess the experience, skills and resp.onslbiUty necessary for the Int~liigenCE! ~alys\ posl,tion..llook forward to speaking with yc:ü further reg~rdin9 this p.osition,. Tliank yo\-! for ¥our tirrie an? con.5Ider~ion.. ". '. : ' .' . '. '. . .', . : ./ :', '. .: ". '.' '. . .... ¡ . " .' ..' .. . . .. . . " . .... . . Sincerely, ? ;}~~ HI ~df ¡ , Jennifer H. Hall ") Enclosure , " . MíA~"9'" , . . # .. I115M 8' COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT I :z.-S-«J5 Item .;2/ Meeting Date 09/05/95 ITEM TITlE: A. Resolution Approving an Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and the United Ståtes Government by and through the Executive Offices of the United States AnorrÏey; for fiscal aQ..ent services. ;- , B. Ordinance Amending Section 2.05.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code to add three unclassified California Border Alliance Group full. time pOsitions. C. Resolution Amending the Fringe Ben'efit Resolutions for Executives and Unrepresented Employees to include three California Border Alliance Group positions. D. Resolution Approving two Reimbursement Agreements and an Intergovernmental Personnel Assignment Agreement and amending the budget to 'appropriate the funds received under the Reimbursement Agreements to the Employee Expenses for the three employees, and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement. SUBMITTED BY: Chief of Police V REVIEWED BY: f9lt~ (4/5th's Vote:YesL No-.J City Manager '~,.J The United States Department of Justice !DOJ) has received funding through ,a variety of federal appropriations to implement the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG). CBAG is one of several regional efforts being implemented throughout the southwestern United States by the DOJ to decrease drug trafficking along the international border with' Mexico. The legislation authorizing funding for CBAG requires the United States Anorney to identify local "fiscal agents" to act as a conduit to obtain civilian suPPOrt personnel and to acquire related supplies and services. This po.licy is designed to provide an enhanced level of national security while maintaining current federal responsibilities and no!. increasing the size of the full-time tederal work force. The 'United States Anorney for the Southern District of California, Mr. Alan Bersin, requested that Chula Vista act as the "fiscal agent" tor CBAG. The proposed ordinance and resolutions would. enable Chula Vista to act in this capacity, result in the full reimbursement of all expenditures by the City in support of CBAG and compensate the City tor related processing costs at the rate of 2% of total CBAG expenditures. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed Ordinance and Resolutions. The staff recommendation will: 1) create 3.0 Unclassified CBAG positions; 2) provide for the City to be reimbursed for all expenses associated with hiring these CBAG positions including a nominal processing cost reimbursement; 3) make payments to the CBAG Executive Director for services rendered from May 1, 1995, to August 31, 1995; and, 4) make appropriate tectinical 'adjustments to the Police Department's Grant Fund bUdget to suPPOrt these actions. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A 4 , . - .' Page 2, Item _ Meeting Date 09/05/95 I. BACKGROUND The United States Attorney's Office - Southern District of California (USA), a division of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), has .received federal funding to implement the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG). The mission of CBAG is to develop multi-jurisdictional, cooperative strategies to: a) gather intelligence on drug traffickers; b) investigate drug trafficking activities; c) arrest persons involved with illegal drug traHicking; and, ·d) to successfully prosecute those arrested. CBAG is funded through a "High Intensity Drug TraHicking Area" (HIDTA) supplemental funding provision contained in - the Federål Appropriations Acts for each federal fiscal year from 1988 to 1995 (the current federal fiscal year); the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of ,1988; and, the N~tional DrlUj..contröl Strategy of 1990. San ... '- ·Diego and Imperial counties have been designated as a HlDTA due to the volume of illegal narcotics entering the United States through' the international border frontier. CBAG receives an annual allocation of HIDTA funding by making application to the DOJ prior to each federal fiscal year. The application reflects the personnel and non-personnel costs for each agency expected to participate in CBAG during that next federal" fisèal year. Upon approval of this grant application, participating agencies. ¡nduping the City. assigns one or more sworn law enforcement oHicers to CBAG. During the course of the year, participating agencies make individual claims to obtain reimbursement from the DOJ for expenses related to their CBAG assigned oHicer. As articulated in the FY 1995-96 Police Department Grant Funds -- Operation Alliance budget (219-2193), the CVPD has assigned 1.0 Police Agent to CBAG. The ordinance and resolutions proposed by staff will: · create the three new unclassified positions (CBAG Executive Director; CBAG Analyst; and, CBAG Secretary) required to provide to an appropriate level of administrative support to this important national security effort; - · provide for the City to be reimbursed for all expenses associated with hiring and maintaining the three pOsitions including a processing fee payable to the City that will be calculated at 2% of total funds passed through the City to CBAG; '. · execute an agreement to pay to the CBAG Executive Director a total of $26,466.6B In reimbursable salary expenses for his w'ork in support of the CBAG from May 1, 1995, to August 31, 1995, and absolve the City of all risks associated with his pertormance of CBAG Executive Director tasks for that time period; · direct staff to place the three new unclassified positions in the City's salary and benefits plans, authorize the Chief of Police, subject to the approval of the City Manager, to appoint Dennis M. Kenneally CBAG Executive Director and Kevin Tidwell CBAG Analyst effective the oHicial date of City Council action on this Items; and, · direct staff to amend the Police Department's Grant Fund budget in the manner prescribed in Attachment A. II. DISCUSSION A. Participation ..and Cooperation. One of the primary Congressional policy objectives of CBAG is to increase cooperation between federal, state and local law enforcement jurisdictions. Accordingly, the CBAG effort is staHed by sworn, civil service employees from local, state and federal Jaw enforcement agencies. HIDT A funds cannot be expended unless each level of law enforcement in 5 · . Page 3, Item_ Meeting Date 09/0S/9!i " HIDT A designated region is represented in the effort. Federal agenci!"s represented in CBAG include the United States Customs Service, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the United States Border Patrol. State agencies represented in CBAG Include the Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement, the Imperial County Sheriff, the San Diego County Sheriff and the District Attorneys of both counties.. local agencies represented CBAG include the San Diågo Unified Port Police Department and numerous municipal police 'departments including the Chula Vista Police Department ICVPD). In total, fOurteen ' . , (14) agencies and over one-hundred SWOrn officers participate In the CBAG effort. The Office of the USA coordinates the efforts of participaiing agencies to' ensure this c90peration and representation <- exists. ' , - - - , B. CBAG Sworl1 Staffing. Notwithstanding their assignment to CBAG, sworn officer~ a~signed to CBAG remain. employees of their respective jurisdictions. This arrangement reflects a CongresSional directive to ~und a policy .of enhancing national security through increased law enforcem~nt effectiveness in HIDT A regions while. Simultaneously, this arrangement maintains a general Congressional policy of not increasing the number of full.time, federal civil service personnel. C. CBAG Support Staffing. In addition to this coordinating role, CBAG was originally administered directly the USA's staff. .Uliimately, the USA determined that in-house staff could no longer effectively support CBAG's expanding operations. While participating agencies have been sympathetic to the\.lSA's ånd the CBAG's administrative needs, participating law enforcement agencies do not have the same level of flexibility with administrative staffs as they typically have with their sworn staffs. Consequently, the USA ,concludéd that CBAß would best be mar-aged by dedicated professional administrative staff. ìhe ÚSA's sought and received aÓditional federal funding to hire three full-time administrative and managerial support personnel: an Executive Director, an Analyst and a Secretary. Given the Congressiol)al policy objective of not adding to the federal civil service and the limited availability of appropriately' trained and åvailable local law enforcement administrative personnel, the USA had very few Options in terms of how to acquire CBAG administrative staff. Each of these options involved the use of contracting with indiyiduals to provide the required services. From the perspective of the USA and Congress, using contract staff in CBAG suPPOrt positions has the same advantages the Use of contract staff has in the City's organizatio'n: contract staff can perform certain functions at a lower cost than permanent employees and contract staff often provide the employer with significantly more flexibility in meeting short- or indefinite-term administrative or operational needs that or that have funding source limitations. D. Fiscal Agency. The USA's Office has two options to implement a contract employee: 1) they can use the centralized DOJ contracting office in Washington, D.C.; or, 2) they can contract with a local agencv to act as their "fisèal agent."' The USA's Office is concerned with two specific aspects of contracting through DOJ., First, it has been the USA's experience that the DOJ's Washington, D.C. contracting office is not particularly responsive tO,the needs of the Southern California District. Second, if the central contracting office is used, it has the ultimate authority to appoint individuals to the positions - an authority the USA would prefer to retain. Accordingly, the USA decided to pursue the latter alternative. And, by retaining local appointing authority, the USA was able to appoint individuals to the Executive Director and Analyst positions who are familiar with the law enforcement operations in the San Diego/Imperial couniy region and those agencies roles in the CBAG effort. The USA has determined that this "local" knowledge will assist in making CBAG as effective and efficient as possible. E. Why Chula Vista. The USA approached Chula Vista to act as the "fiscal agent" based on a number of factors. First, the USA felt it was imperative that a participating entity act as the CBAG 6 - '. Page 4, Item_ Meeting Datc 09/05/95 fiscal agent. Second, the Executive Ortice for the United States Attorneys advised the USA that, based on their substantial experience in managing similar fiscal agency relationships, using a fiscally sound municipal government was the most efficient and effective course of action. Third, the USA, again acting on .the acÎvice of the Executiv~ Offico, èxpressed a preference to obtain tho services of a fiscal agent,th'at was of sufficient administrative capacity to handle the CBAG workload without significant organizational impact; but not so largo that processing requirements would be cumbersome. Fourth, Chief Em.erson has been instr~,!,.entåi in the development of local agency participation in CBAG via his role as Chair of the County Chief's and Sheriff's Association. ,- I . _- . . In the course of the past twenty-four months, Chief Emerson has developed a valuable relationship with the USA, Mr. Alan Bersin. This r~lationship has contributed significantly to the Polico Department obtaining reimbursement funding for its pai-ticipation in: Operation Alliance (a component of CBAG which pays 100% of ~he assigned Police Agent's expenses): and, Operation Buckstop and the Organized Crime Task Force (efforts that have reimbursed the City approximately $76,057 in associated Overtime expenditures since their inception April 1994). The City of Chula Vista was the only agency participating in CBAG which met all of the USA's eligibility criteria and was, therefore, his first choice to serve CBAG as its fiscal agent. . F. Conceptual Development. Based on these factors, the USA approached Chief Emerson with the concept of ChL¡la Vista acting as the CBAG fiscal agent in May, '1995. Based on the complexity of the policy issues raised by entering into a fiscal agency relationship with the federal government, appointing incumbent staff and making payments thereto, creating new unclassified pOSitions and enhancing the City's role in CBAG from simple participation to significant administrative involvement, Chief Emerson agreed to bring the idea forward for Council consideration subsequent to the FY 1995-96 budget pr,?cess. This item !las been crahed through a cooperative effort of staff from the Police Department, City Manager's Office, City Attorney's Office and the Personnel Department in an effort to appropriately address those policy issues. Ill. SUB-ITEM SPECIFIC DISCUSSION A. Resolution Approving an Agreement betwe,en the City of Chula Vista and the United States Government by and through the Executive Offices of the United States Attorney for fiscal agent services. The proposed agreement will protect the City from potential liabilities that could arise from services performed by the CBAG Executive Director prior to his employment by the City in much the same manner as the city is protected in its more' timely and.conventional professional services agreements. This resoluiion also results in payments to Mr. Kenneally for services rendered to CBAG from May 1, 1995 to August 30, 1995 ($31;728). This amount will be funded by one of the two Reimbursement "Agreements discussed below. Mr. Kenneally has not been paid since assuming his duties. The decision to hire Mr. Kenneally as Executive Director was made by the USA and endorsed by the Chief Officers of the participating ågencies (including Chief Emerson) prior to the .identification of a fiscal agent. B. Ordinance Amending Section 2.05.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code to add three unclassified California Border Alliance Group full-time positions. Article VII, Section 701 (a)(7) enables the City Council to create Unclassified Service positions for 'Persons employed to fill pOsitions which have been created for work andlor projects funded entirely or in part by grants made to the City.' Article VII, Section 701(a)(8) requires that such positions be created by an Ordinance adopted by a 4/5ths Vote of the 'City Council. Chapter 2.05.010 of the Municipal Code specifies the unclassified positions established by the City Council. This section of the Municipal Code must be 7 . '. . . Page 5. Item_ Meeting Date 09/05/95 amended to reflect the inclusion of the proposed CBAG positions. The USA and the Chief Officers (including Chief Emerson) of the participating agencies have concluded that, in order to provide professional administrative support for 'tile CBAG. one executive-!evel and two general-level employees. In terms of equivalency to existing classified positions. the Executive Director is proposed to be the equivalent of, Police Captain ($65;728 - $79,893), the CBAG Analyst is proposed to be the equivalent of Administrative Analyst i ($27.957 - $33,9811, and the CBAG Secretary is proposed to be the equivalent of Administrative Secretary ($28.047 - $34.090). Specifically, based on his agreement with the USA, it is proposed that the Executive Director be paid a montf1ly salary of $6,416.77 ($77,000 , annually) plus a $200 per month car allowance. ·1t is' further:proposed that the" CBAG Analyst ~. ($1071.57 monthly/$27,957 annually) and Secretary ($1075.02 monthly/$28,047 annually) start at . A· step within their respective salary ranges. All three recommended employees will receive the benefit pac'kage prescribed for their representation unit. All direct costs born by the City of Chula Vista in the employment of the three proposed positions will be reimbursed by the DOJ through the Executive Office for United States Anorneys. .C_ Resolution Amending the Fringe Benefit Resolutions for Executives and Unrepresented Employees to inclüde "three California Border Alliance Group positions. This resolution will amend the Fringe Benefit Resolutions that specify the' benefit package for the two representation units into which it is .recommended the CBAG employees be placed. The proposed Resolution will add the three' recommended CBAG positions to the employees specified to receive benefits. D. Resolution Approving two Reimbursement Agreements and an Intergovernmental Personnel Assignment Agreementand amending t/.1e budget to appropria"te the funds received under ,the Reimbursement Agreem!'nts to the E'mployee Expenses for the three employees, and authorizing trye Mayor to execute said agreement. The Reimbursement Agreement (RA) is the DOJ's offer to reimburse the City for what they term ·contract employment- of the three positions. RA-1 (see Attachment B) reflects the DOJ offer to reimburse the City for costs up to $104,350 associated with the CBAG Executive Director and the CBAG Secretary through September 30. 1995 ,(the end of the current federal fiscal year). Given that RA-1 will not provide reimbyrsement beyond September 30, 1995, accepting the DOJ offer contain!'d in .RA-1 at this time appears, on its face, to be somewhat imprudent. However, the USA has assured staff that another RA, funded from Federal FY 1996 DOJ appropriations, will be forthcoming to ensure continued funding of the CBAG Executive Director and CBAG S.ecretary positions. RA-2 (see Attachment C) reflects the DOJ offer to reimburse the City for costs up to $36,636 associated wi,th the CBAG Anaiyst through June 30, 1996. RA-2 funds the CBAG Analyst position through the end of. the City's FY.1995-96. According to the USA, all three positions have an approximate funding expectancy of at least twenty-four months. The proposed Resolutions and Ordinances contain, specific language conditioning the employment of CBAG positions to federal funding through the DOJ and the Executive OHice for United States Attorneys. Specifically, this proposed Resolution accepts the DOJ offer to reimburse the City for costs not to exceed $140,986 associated with the three recommended CBAG positions subject to the cited time- trames and conditions. The purposes of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act Agreement are to provide: 1) a mechanism tor the City to loan employees to the Federal government; and, 2) complete indemnification by the Federal government to the City for all acts of those employees (see Attachment D). Additionally, the FY 1995-96 Police Grant Fund budget includes an appropriation of $84,200 lot Division 219-2193 -- Operation Alliance. Operation Alliance is one of the initiatives under the CBAG umbrella. Based on the tact that the existing Poiice Agent funded by Operation Alliance and the three 8 ·'. Page 6, Item_ Meeting Date 09105/95 CBAG positions proposed herein share the same funding source, ic made sense to add the recommended CBAG positions to this budget. Attachm(!nt A describes the amendment at the object account level. The distribution of the $1~6,530 available based on the limitations inherent in the Reimburseme'nt Agreements as described above, specifically that the Executive Director and Secretary positions have received funding only through September 30, 1995. Finally, this resolution provides for the approval of the position descriptions for each of the three CBAG positions. (see Attachment E, F, and G). . - , - - FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the staff recommendation will result in the appropriation of $136,530', in the amounts and accounts' specified in Attachm(!nt A, for the purpose of creating three new unclassified positions effective October 1, 1995, to provide professio~al administrative support of the California Border Alliance Group. The Reimbursement Agreements tendered by the DOJ will provide for reimbursement of all City expenditures related to the three positions and approximately $2,570 in processing cost charges. Based on anticipated expenses, net fiscal impact is + $2,570. 9 .... ATT.AC.I-IMtNT A Budget Amendment Fund 219, Division 2193 - Operation Alliance Object Account Amount Proposed Use 5101 $28,840 Funded Salaries 10/1195 . 6/30/96 5106 $200 Executive Car Allowance - September 5141 $5,160 Funded Retirement 10/1/95 - 6/30/96 , .'~ 5142 $5,440 Funded Flexible BenefitŠ" 10/1195 - 6/30/96' 5143 $420 Funded Medicare 10/1195 - 6/30/96 5201 $26,470 Funded Professional Services 5/1/95 _ 10/1/95 5398 $?4,OOO Funded Computer and Telephone Equipment 5566 $16,000 Funded Office Furniture Total $136,530 Total Anticipated Reimbursable Expenses /l j,:;4'/l'// /f/£~¡'LI :; í .::r :: 10 -- _..~--~_.._._-- flTí~.~.Œ1-JT B U.s. Department of J'o.Stïœ ar Code 1 Reimbursement Agreement Between Agenåes .;~t~f~~(:~~it';R\t~;;{Ö::S?:if:~:~:i: r:;w~·tWt:'f}¡::!t~9i~~:~,i!:.f~(,~::nw¡:~~wW:~:~?::{:~'Ù~ Pa'i1:íU'f'o' Lhil(="",-' eÎ:Dêñh~' '~':. :-·:Ut;..."::\:AW?t:":(~'~..~%Wi~'¥t.~:~~~~~.h~H:~t;·:r~'·: ~::';:/f.~:'~~:~:¡.. Provider Agcacy CWCotDcr Agency rovidcr Cost Center CN Description Stomer Number Cu,S(omcr AJiu 5-15010004 rovidcr COQUCt bone Phone evin Hardy (G19) G91-5144 od Shaffer 292/G1G-G88G Wle ame (if billing address is differeDI, specify 00 revc<se side.) ity of Chula Vista, Chula Vista Police ecutive Office for United' States Attorneys epartment: ddrcss ddrcss - ~:. 7G 4th Avenue 600 E Street:; N.H., Room 8000 i<y talc Zip i<y hula Vista ashington HiW¡tftÆi@fÆîîÆ*MMMK#M;;Pdìß$¡&@hWf1W!¡;îWi1Jf_!fftN&1J*Pifát£Wl$W.[t~W;FPMi;iP¡¡;¡Œitii;Œ¡WlliÞNWœ¡:>tYCIî!1i3@rt\tf1¡;'>';'i?'YDS lsAgrccmcnc shall become cff~c[ive on May 1. 1995 and shall conúnuc: lhrough Sectember 30. 1995. i%iiiif!N0¡¡¡WåMi';Wi.\i{!ii'í1W:¡¡&fÆWJJ;{ttiilimrtð¡mifli!~ti¡YLdjj;W§lfi!¥.;;jJii:i.&:~t%K#;i1r;g¡¡N~'!X@;g@u'.;n:'·@1WijM%K#fi~;g¡WW;Wti>·i<i':?"Wi ri~/ c.rPWItCn"Ofl 01 work !,r urvices 10 b~ p~rform~d and basú lor 'd~/umifliflg COSI: he United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of California, agrees to reimburse the ity of Chula Vista, Chula Vista Police Depart~ent, for contract employment of the Executive irector and a secretary for the California Border Alliance Administration HIDTA. Salary and ther expenses are estimated as follows: Salaries/Benefits/Car Allowance $4G,OOO ravel/Training 3,000 -auicment 33,000 FÛrniture 20,000 Process:ing 1,850 otal: $104,350 il1ings will be monthly based on actual expenses. Esúmat:d amount (Arr:::ch addirior.al shul/or conrir.UDtion oj aplanarion, 1/ nu~ssary.) 5104,3'50 i¡fÆ¡¡;¡gMŒgWWni1Œi#¡;'¡1tZø&¡¡i;mîÆ;W1;mhfM¡;;\iNmMf)j%,!;Mtǧ¥'Œijßt¡!:€~t*f~WMnMiMMÆœfi¡¡:i1iMMA*M*t\\niŒAm:.¡;Y¡;t¡H¡M$ÚV""}!/U (Cu.sIOtr'..u a.g~flC'j will indicp/~ accounllo b~ charg~d. F~dual ag~flcies will b~ bill~d OPAC. c.rc~pllor Ih~ OBDs, USUS &: DOD.) Agency Location Code Appropriation Symbol oS! Cenler/SaC 10 be Cha.rged YRe g Doc 150~OO04 1550322 5E409G11029B (for aBD and USMS only) DC# 75540 SOC 1190 , !(Sa U~'uu side o//orm.) I Approved ror Provider Office: Approved (or Customer Office:: , 'Organiza.tion City of Chula Vista, Chula Vista polic'e Office for United States Atto~eys Department ) SignJrJrc: Title ::ity Nanage=, City of Chula Vista Director, Administrative Services FORM DOJ-216 OCTOBER t 993 11 . AITACJlME.,lJT C ., U.S. Department of Justice fllOr COde Reúnbursement Agreement Between Agenåes ,~"j;~,1µ'Œ~"'''f%f.'\';;>::f,t'¡~niPQiW~';~¡¡;:¡¡;1'!:i\''1í1~Ø,'''"::W~'4~''l'IiitiëS'"tiJ'·lh.'¡~'ëînëiìi:7';""/j'f.''I;'':''''-'')'i¡-¡'j\'~~fit%,WMg"",,,~:.1Æ'-'!f'~'~"'"'~''''''~¿'1'~d;: PrOY(dcr Agency Cwtomcr Ageacy Provider COSt Cenl<:r [CN fCN Dcscripdon \-lJstomcr Numbcr CUstOmer Alia.s 5-15010004 rovidcr COQUet lte pSlOmer Con13et Phoae ¡::evin Hardy (619) 691-5144 Irod Shaffer 202/&16-6886 fName !N"amc (if billing address is diffcrcnt. specify On rcverse side.) ~ity of Chula Vista, Chu1a Vista Police Executive Office for United States Atto~ey~. e>epartment ,- "delress i\delress - 276 4th Avenue 600 E Street, N.W. , Room 8000 C,iry ~e ~p '-iry 1~1<: ~p =-hula Vista 91910 twashington 20530 i@*ff11\1{;Wg\t.if@tMJi;;rktWt;¡f,1¥M%t_4{t\Wi:1fj!iW~ÆHli¥ìf4N¡Pf€¥JlÆEPë¡¡;ifAWM¡§WBìnH?!.ø¡ii;;m¡¡¡Nfr1!Wt!tð;¡:figitg¥;i?!!9i¡:XiW'lf::B~i (This Agreemcnt s.haH become cffcclÎvc on June 26, 1995 and shall conúnuc lhraugh JUIle 30. 1996. X@ifiWn1i&Ii\WWillÆî$1!#lWIWWki%ËWÔì1%ill1i0Æ&:;iWJfif!f§fßl!ifit!ii;;¡§Æm¥£!W,9)if\!,<,!û:;¡;:œW@¡¡¡¡¡:;;ftiJ1iîtltM;¡S'i;ít¡g®t¡¡U¡H:;\f:%i!.\}f!{B Bri~j e.rplattarion of work or urvica /0 be performcd and basis lor dClumlning COJI: The United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of California, agrees to reimburse the ity of Chula Vista, Chula Vista Police Department, for contract employment of Kevin Tidwell, ~riminal Intelligence Specialist (NIN Analyst) for assignment to the Violent Crimes Task Force for a twelve month period, which was approved under the Anti-violent Crime Initiative by the ~nited S~ates Department of Justice. Salary and other expenses are estimated as follows: Salaries $34,717 -fisc. 1,200 Processing 719 tal: $36,636 ~illings will' be monthly based on actual expenses. Esúmatcd amOUDt . (Artach additional Jhurfor continuan·on oj aplattan'on, If n~ceJJary.) S36,636 @iifWIfJ&&1i%¡Mi¡¡Mfn\!Kt¡#ì@ift*1¡Wiili!J!ìì_iWi;W.J&.%tiifAg~tðÆt:ûJ~!Jì)mfiWMi11MfìîiMWtZ!t;¡;ìlMW;J\tKì\N!ffi¡Wftt.'%%í@IM&:;WWitlî\1\1. (CUstom a og<ncy witt indico" oeCOUnt to b< charg<d. Fdaol og<nci<s witt b< bilkd OPAC, uc<ptfor 0< OBDs, USUS« DOD.) , -"'geney Loeatioa Code \ :Appropriation Symbol ['-os. Center/SaC '0 be Charged YRegDoe 15010004 1550322 5E64039B SOC 1190 ((or aBD and USMS o;'¡)") DCN: 75542 @¡M!lÙJîj1gW@@¡jM¡M:mMMi!tMWmìWtjj¡t%%\'î.t%t%tlif&'it?Xj¡jiîj¡j1í1i6:i€f§'i~R¥M1tlffiW-¿iiìWtMlliMii£,íifgWtÛimfjf¡\ttWiWktXfMMiitU.mì;WJi&Mi (S~t rnuu Jió~ a/form.) Approved for Provider Office: Approved for CUstomer Office:: Org>niz3[ion Org>nizaùon . ~ity of Chula Vista, Chula Vista Police Exeputivy'-ffj for ~ed States Atto~~ys ::::partment I 11_1 --'- , Sign:Hurc: '. . ~ W.{ CW-f/1-D lri[le rd[le Services ~ity Nanager, City of Chula Vista ~eputy Director, Administrative ~ FORM DO) 216 oerOBER 993 12 ------ ArrAGH''''¡;:''YT .D . . , - ,- - THIS PAGE IS BLANK THE PROPOSED INTERGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT HAD NOT BEEN RECEIVED BY STAFF AS OF PRINTING. IF. THE AGREEMENT IS RECEIVED BEFORE COUNCIL TAKES ACTION ON THIS ITEM, IT WILL PRESENTED TO COUNCIL. IF THE AGREEMENT IS NOT RECEIVED BEFORE COUNCIL IS SCHEDULED TO TAKE ACTION ON THIS ITEM, STAFF WILL RECOMMEND THE ITEM BE CONTINUED. , 13 . ATTAC-HME)Jf" F , , . . JOB SPECIFICATION California Border Alliance Group Analyst Salary: $27,957 - $33,981 The incumbent serves as the Criminal Intelligence Specialist for the San Diego/lmperial Counties High Intensity Drug Trafficking ""rea IHIDTAI anê1 reports directly to the HIDTA Executive Director. The appointing authority for this position is the Chief of Police of the Ci\ý of Chula Vista. The incumbent serves in suPPOrt, of the Executive Director, HIDTA staff, the Executive Committee of the HIDTA and the United States Attorney. The incumbent collects and analyzes narcotics intelligence information using various dat~ bases. Duties include, but are not limited to: collecting information from a variety ~ of Sources; analyzil]g, evaluatirig, and torre!ating ¡hit rnformatiòrl'j querY law enforcement databases; _ input and maintain information in data bases;ïraèk critical events and filing; reporting information in wri~en and verbal form; Writing criminal intelligence reports; preparing computer-analysis link charts; and, preparing correspondence an memoranda: The position requires two (2) years experience in criminal intelligence work and a Bachelor's degree in Criminal Justice, Political Science or a related field. Position require~ knowledge of criminal intelligence techniques and procedures, charting techniques, and types of applicable crimes and laws, ability to work independently, possess good personal skills, good oral and COmmunicátion skills, and computer skills. This position is a term appointment established to temporarily assist the U.S. Attorney's Office in its ,role to help establish counter-drug task forces assóciated with the District's designation as a High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. Establishment of these tåsk forces and acquisition of grants and temporary funding sources to support these task forces require more administrative expertise than is available in the U.S. Attorney's Office. The life span of the task forces and this pOsition is temporary, and will exist in only until drug trafficking in the Sa'; Diego/Imperial Counties area is eradicated or shifts to another region of the United States, or until the City of Chula Vista declines to participate in HIDT A or, without cause, terminates this position. The City of Chula Vista is the Fiscal Agent for this position. The incumbent is an employee of the City of Chula Vista, California, on loan to United States Government. Therefore, the incumbent is an "Unclassified/At_WiIi Employee" of the City of Chula Vista subject entirely to the continuation, and receipt by Chula Vista, of HIDTA funding designated forthe salaries and benefits of this pOsition. Unclássified/At_Will emploýees of the City of Chula Vista are subject"to unilateral termination at any ìime, for any reason determined appropriate by the Chief of Pólice of the City of Chula Vista. The incumbent shall not: violate any federal, ~tate or local "law, statute or ordinance, or conduct their personal or professional affairs in an inappropriate manner; act in contravention of a policy decision by the City Council, City Manager or Chief of Police of the City of Chula Vista; perform the duties of this position in an unsatisfactory manner; acquire conflicts. of interesi as defined by the California Fair Political Practices Commission without obtaining the prior approval of the City of Chula Vista; or, make, cause or acquire knowledge of any change to the Intergovernmental Personal Act Agreement governing this position without notifying the City Attorney of the City of Chula Vista, who may, at his/her unilateral discretion approve or disapprove any such change. ACknowledged: (Signature) (Pdnt Name Legibly) Date: 14 tt7TACl-jMeJ C- - JOB SPECIFICATION California Border Alliance Group Executive Director Salary: $65,728 - $79,893 Annually The incumbent serVes as the Executive Director for the San Diego/lmperial Counties High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA), The appointing authority for this position is the Chief of Police of the City of Chula Vista. The incumbent is responsible to, and is the principal advisor for, the Chairman of the Executive Comminee of the HIDT A and the United States Anorney regarding management issues confronting the anorneys and law enforcement agencies'regarding the,interdiction oi drug-trafficking in the Southern ' - District of California. Th.e U.S. Anorney"is"the feClerallitigator and prosecutor for the United States in the District with responsibility for managing caseload, the nature, complexity, and volume of which requires frequent progra"m and resource redirection. The incumbent has comprehensive financial management, organization, public relaiions, oversight, personnel responsibilities for the San Diego/Imperial Coùnties HIDTA and participates in the formulation of national drug interdiction strategy. The incumbent manages the administration of HIDT A operations and, as such, conducts studies, develops policies and procedures, and implements plans to enhance HIDTA programs. This position is a term appointment established to temporarily assist the U.S. Anorney's Office in its role to help est~blish counter-drug task forces asso"ciated with the District's designation as a High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. Establishment of these task forces and acquisition of grants and temporary funding sources to s~pport these task forces require more administrative expertise than is available in the U.S. Anornoy's Office. The life span of the task forces and this position is temporary, and will exist in orily until drug Úafficking in the San Diego/lmperial Cou'nties area is eradicated or shihs to anoth'er region of the United States, or until the City of Chula Vista declines to participate in HIDT A or, without cause, terminates this pOsition. The City of Chula Vista is the Fiscal Agent for this position. The incumbent is an employee of the City of Chula Vista, California, on loan to United States Government. Therefore, the incumbent is an -Unclassified/At-Will Employee" of the City of Chula Vista subject entirely to the continuation, and receipt by Chula Vista, of HIDT A funding designated for the salaries and benefits of this pOsition. Unclassified/At-Will employees of the .City of Chula Vista are subject to unilateral termination at any time, for any reason determined appropriate by the Chief of Police of the City of Chula Vista. The incumbent shall not: violate any federal, state or local law, statute or ordinance, or conduct their personal or professional affairs in an inappropriate manner; act in contravention of a policy decision by the City Council, City Manager or Chief of Police of the City of Chula Vista; perform the duties of this position in an unsatisfactory manner; acquire conflicts of interest as defined by the California Fair Political Practices Commission without obtaining the prior approval of the City of Chula Vista; or, make, cause or acquire knowledge of any change to the Intergovernmenta'l Personal Act Agreement governing this position without notifying the City Anorney of the City of Chula Vista, who may, at his/her unilateral discretion approve or disapprove any such change. ACknowledged: (Signature) (Print Name Legibly) Date: 15 · ATTAc.Hi<'1EìJT G " JOB SPECIFICATION California Border Alliance Group Secreatary Salary: $28,046 - $34,090 The incumbent serves as the Secreatary to the Executive Director for the San Diegollmperial Counties High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area fH/DTA). The appointing authority for this pOsition is the Chief of Police of the City of Chula Vista. The incumbent serves in support of the Executive Director, HIDT A staff and the Executive Comminee of the HIDTA and the United States Attorney. The incumbent will be responsible for preparing a vareity , of confidential documents, composing éorresponenceireceiving visitors a~d callers, arrãnging meetings, = making travel arrangements and maintianing files and retrieving documents contained therein. The in,cumbent will provide a variety of comple¡¡ and confidential support s,¡rvices must therefore have knowleC1ge of microcompters and a variety of word processing, spreadsheet and database applications. Three-years experiance in a similar capacity is required. The position requires a combination of skill, knowledge, ability or education which demonstrates that a candidate can successfully perform the duties described above. This position is a term appointment established to temporarily assist t/¡e U.S. Anorney's Office in its' role to help establish counter-drug task forces associated with the District's designation as a High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. Establishment of these task forces and acquisition of grants and temporary funding sources to support these ¡ask forces require more administrative expertise than is available in the U.S. Anorney's Office., The life span of the task forces and this position is temporary, and will exist in only until drug trafficking in the.San Dieoollmperial Counties area is eradicated or shifts to another region of the United States, or until the City of Chula Vista declines to participate in HIDTA or, without cause, terminates this position. The City of Chula Vista is the Fis,cal Agent for this position. The incumbent is an employee of the City of Chula Vista, Cali/ornia, on loan to United States Government. Therefore, the incumbent is an "Unclassified/At-Will Employee" of the City of Chula Vista subject entirely to the continuation, and receipt by Chula Vista, of HIDT A funding designated for the salaries and benefits of this pOsition. Unclassified/At-Will employees of the City of Chula Vista are Subject to unilateral termination at any time, for any reason determined appropriate by the Chief of Police of the City of Chula Vista. The incumbent shall, not: violate any federal, state or local law, statute or ordinance, or conduct their personal or professional affairs in an inappropriate manner; act in contravention of a policy decision by the City Council, City Manager' or Chief of Police of the City of Chula Vista; perform the duties of this position in an unsatisfactory manner; acquire conflicts of interest as defined by, the California Fair Political Practices Commission without obtaining the prior approval of the City of Chula Vista; or, make, cause or acquire knowledge of any, change to the Intergovernmental Personal Act Agreement governing this poSition without notifying the City Anorney of the City of Chula Vista, who may, at his/her unilateral discretion approve or disapprove any such change. ACknowledged: (Signature) (Print Name Legibly) Date: 16 · RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT BY AND THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF" THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR FISCAL AGENT SERVICES - ~:. WHEREAS, the U. S. Attorney's Office has retained the services of Dennis M. Kenneally as Executive Director of the California Border Alliance Group to provide drug interdiction services in high intensity drug trafficking areas such as is within the South Bay portion of the County of San Diego; and WHEREAS, the U. S. Attorney's Office has not been, due to budgetary or other constraints, able to pay ,compensation to Mr. Kenneally and has requested the city of Chula Vista, upon receiving frunds from the U. S. Attorney's office to provide said compensation for historical services previously rendered by Mr.. Kenneally to the U. S. Attorney's Office. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve an Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and the United States Government by and through the Executive Offices of the United States Attorney for Fiscal Agent Services, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No. (to be completed by the Clerk in the final document). - BE IT FUR:rHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by Richard Emerson, Chief of Bruce H. Boogaard, City Police Attorney C:\rs\cb2o 17 '. -' '(1) AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT BY AND THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR FISCAL AGENT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made this -.5J,{ day of..5l?7,1:/'7/J''¿:-{ , 1995 for the purpose of reference only and effective as of the date last executed by the parties is between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a Chartered municipal corporation of the State of California and TH~ UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, by and through~he Executive Offices or the United states Attorney, a Division of the United States government and is made with reference to the following facts: WHEREAS, the U. S. Attorney's Office has retained the services of one Dennis M. Kenneally as Executive Director of California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) to provide drug interdiction services in high intensity drug trafficking areas such as is within the South Bay portion of·the Cou~ty of San Diego; and WHEREAS, the U. S. Attorney's Office has not been, due to bUdgetary or other constraints, able to pay compensation to Mr. Kenneally and has requested the City of Chula Vista, Upon receiving funds from the U. S·. Attorney's Office to provide said compensation for histo~ical services previously rendered by Mr. Kenneally to the U. S. Attorney's Office. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree: l. Upon receiving appropriate funds in the amount of $31,730, the City will pay Mr. Kenneally $31,730 for services rendered to the U. s. Attorney's Office between May 1, 1995 and August 30, 1995. 2. The U. S. Attorney's Office agrees that as consideration for the City acting as a fiscal agent for the U. S. Attorney's Office in this matter, that the City is entitled to receive two percent (2%) of the total amount of funds processed by .. - chula Vista for providing the fiscal agent services herein specified. 3 . The U. S. Attorney's Office agrees to pay the City's fiscal ageT!t services at the same time they provide funds to the City for the payment over to Mr. Kenneally for his services rendered to them. 4. Nothing herein is intended and both parties admit that Mr. Kenneally has not been nor has provided the City with employment or professional services, and is not an employee or independent contractor for the City. 5. The U. S. Attorney's Office agrees to indemnify the City of Chula Vista for any and all costs, expenses, losses, CCJ7S~/JYJ 18 Cf/JYOd.-ý jUdgments, attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with providing these fiscal agent services. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -#~ ' . ,()~ Chula A;Lan lJers~n '- - - aJtiU asr C:\ao\kenMally 19 , . RESOLUTION NO.~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FRINGE BENEFIT RESOLUTION FOR EXECUTIVES AND UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES TO INCLUDE THREE CALIFORNIA BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP FULL-TIME POSITIONS . .. WHEREAS, it is' necessary to a~nd 'the Fringe Benefit Resolution for Executives and Unrepresented employees to include three California Border Alliance Group fUll-time positions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the C~ty of chula Vista does hereby amend the Fringe Benefit Resolution for Executives and Unrepresented Employees to include the California Border Alliance Group Executive Director, Analyst and Secretary as set forth in Attachment 1 and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. Presented by Approved as to form by Richard Emerson, Chief of Bruce H. Boogaard, City Police Attorney C:\rs\cb.ag.F8 20 .' _,.,_____._m RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO CIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING TWO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS AND AN INTER ERSONNEL ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT AND AMENDING THE BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE THE FUNDS RECEIVED UNDER THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS TO THE EMPLOYEE EXPENSES FOR THE THREE EMPLOYEES, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENTS - 1~ - WHEREAS, the Reimbursement Agreement (RA) is the Department of Justice's offer to reimburse the City for what they term "contract employment" of the three positions; and WHEREAS, RA-1 (Attachment B) reflects the DOJ offer to reimburse the City for costs up to $104,350 associated with the CBAG Executive Director and the CBAG Secretary through September 30, 1995; and WHEREAS, RA-2 (Attachment C) reflects the DOJ offer to reimburse the City for costs up to $36,636 associated with the CBAG Analyst through June 30, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Interpersopnel Assignment Agreement is Attachment D. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve two Reimbursement Agreements and an Interpersonnel Assignment Agreement, copies of which are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Hayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the FY 1995-96 Police Department Grant Funds -- Operation Alliance (219-2193) is amended to reflect $136,530 in additional expenses required to support three fUll-time, reimbursable, California Border Alliance Group positions. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $136,530 is hereby appropriated to Fund 219, Division 2193 as set forth on Attachment A. Presented by Approved as to form by Richard Emerson, Chief of Bruce H. Boogaard, City Police Atto'rney 21 · . - ~ .0. '. . jUdgments, attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with Providing these fiscal agent services. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ,- Mayor of the City of Chula Alan Bersin Vista ATTEST City Clerk Approved as to form by City Attorney C:\:aC\kennully -. , 22 IJû'14 :,Jtj t:.:: 1.; 'Jti19 j,j7 ti~.;1J Cü.\(; . ~ . . ( - THE: Cire" OF I ATTACHMENT "B" SAN DIEGO poue:: DEI'.u1T.II£.W ' uo/ BRO.WII:U· S.iN DIECO. CAUfORSf,\ 911V1· $;29 . TELEPHONE (6/9) $J/.2C/jO OFFICE OF IN "'LYING JERRY SANDERS PLEASE CIVE OVA REF. NO. CHIEF OF POLICE , .- lVlEMORANbUM OF UNDERSTANDIN"G (PACB 1 01'" J) The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) has awarded a HIDTA Grant (Appendix A), to the San Diego Police Department (SDPD) in behalf of all St~te and Local Law Enforcement Agencies participating in the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG). These funds shall be \ sed as designated in each agency's CBAG- recommended and ONDCP-ap'proved budget for each initiative (Appendix B) . Scope of S,ervice The oCl,-V lcc=, carrie.d out under i:hio 1D.cmor~ndum of undorctø.nding shall be consistent with those contained in the Initiative Proposal and Budget as approved ~or funding by ONDCP. Changes shall not be nade in the subject olf the proposed objectives and products of initiative activities w~thout prior written approval from the CBAG Executive Committee and the Southwest Border HIDTA Director. Reprogramming of Fundk Reprogramming of funds ¡require different levels of approval based on the amount to be regrogrammed and whether the reprogramming is inter-agency or inter~initiative, In all cases the recipient agency is responsible: for maintaining detailed records of the reprogramming activities and forwarding a request for authorization to the CBAG Executive dommittee. Reporting ReQUirements1 A final report of ini iative expenditures shall be su~mitted to CBAG within thirty (30) days after the close of the approved period . of the HIDTA grant. I~terim financial reports shall be submitted to CBAG by April 30thlfor the period ending March 31st. It is understood that these reports are required by ONDCP. The financial report shall contain expenditures/costs by cost categories of the appro~ed initiative budget and the comparison of actual e>.:penditures/coþts against budget estimates. Failure to submit reports on a timely basis may result in the interruption or termination of the initiative funding for'that agency. Detail?d information on the financial rep,orting requirement are \~\i\. found 1n the FY96 Program Guidance (Append1x C). .;<j<~ç:. 4_~'~' " Yj=. ¥ .¡ 0 DIVci<S¡ '~I·..~'..:.......~.,..,~.,., a~s t:S .A~l ro: UÔ 1..1 :Jõ 1~: lti 5'ô19 5jj 6..¡:)() <:6,\<: . .. E~c¡¡$O,\ ~ OOJ.·OOJ . ---- ~ Memorandwn of Understanding (?:lOR 2 0.. 2) Financial Management Standards (Reter to Appenqix A) Records Retention (B€ter to Appendix A) -- EquipmenUVehicIes (Reter to Appendix A) Procurement Standards (Refer to Appendix A) Suppìanting (Refer to Appendix A) Invoicing Each agency shall invoice once per month, on or about the fifteenth of the month, for expenditures incurred during the prior month. Invoices shall report each initiative separately and contain the expenditures by category ",ith the agency maintaining the docUI:lentation. Equipment should be identified by item and cost. A CBAG inventory bar code tag will be issued for each item. Each agency shall maintain the item in its inventory and place the CBAG bar code tag on each item. This ",ill assist us in meeting ONDCP's requirement for a Partnership Equipment Book. Acceptance Acceptance of this MOU by participating agencies is acceptance of all standards and conditions of the HIDTA Grant, included as i'.ppandix A. Participating Agency: Fiscal Agent: Chu1a vista Police Department San Diego Police Department ~ {f!l "th .Ç ___ .L- p/~/,-r R~chard P. Emerson, Chief ate Jerry San ers, Ch~ef Date APPLICATION FOR OMB Approva' No. OJ48.000l.l FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. DATE SUBMITTED Aøphcanl 1C:.nClfter lId /00 J 1. rfPE OF SUBMISSION: . !J. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE SUIt Ap"IICUiOn Id.nQ~" Apølaåon P,uø~acon ~ Con.sll'~alO" - a ConS~Qon .. DATE RECSVED BY ÆDERAL ÞaH:.Y Ftd...:alldenahe, D Non-Construction o Non.Construaon n.a. s. I'PPlICANT INFORMATION L~:aJ Name: OtganlUDOnaI Ut1IC Adcreu tgn. c:rfy, c:oc.ortty. .tM_. .and", ~1: N.Jtnt.and It'ephone numbolr 0' peuon 10 bt conQCled on ma~." in\lOlWlg h' .J.Ppllaoon (~_~ 1401 Broadllay : , : ~ = San Die 0 CA. 9 0 - 6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER iE/H): [Ç] [iGJ - A.S13re H, Indeø.nc:lonl School o.SI. 8. ïYPE OF APPLICATION; B. Counry I, State Conuolled Institution ot Htgtler lumll"O C. MuniOøal J. P'lVare U"'versuy 2 ReVIsIOn D. Township K. indian Trrbt! i=xNew :J ConUnuallOn E.I""rstale l. Indwlduaf F. Inrennunic:ipal M. P,olilOrganization 0 0 G. Speoal DistrlC! N. OÙ'\., (Spec¡Iy) " ReVIsion. enler aøproønate lener{s in bo.l(es A. Increase Award B. D9Ctea..se Award C. Increase Duration D. Deaease Dut3!1on Ot1'ler (spedlyf. ". 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: Office of National prug Control Ploicy , 10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER: ". OeSCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT: [iliJ ~ High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area - for TlTL E : :Southern California Border Area. f AREAS AFFECTEO BY ?ROJECT ICi.... Counti... Sf.,... .tOJ: I I San Die 0 and 1m erial C n 13. PROPOSED PROJECT ¡ 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: rs;;,t Oa[8 'a, Apolu:.an[ : b. Project ! 1/1/96 12/31 96 48 49 0 i 15. ESTIMATED FUNDING: 16. IS APPUCATlON SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXEClJT1VE ORDER i a. F~era1 15 ,00 I 12:172 PROCESS? , 5 060 772 a, YES. THIS PREAPPl/CATlONlAPPLICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE b Aoolleanl S .00 TO THE STATE EXECUTive ORDER 12372 PROCESS FCR REVIEW ON: c. Slale S .00 OATE d. Local S ,00 b. NO. X:x PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY e.o. 12312 e.Otrler IS .00 o OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR 0 REVIEW I. Pr~ram Income S .00 0 17. IS THE APPUCANT OEUNOUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? ç. TOTAL S .00 o Ves If -Yes: attach an explanation. xOii N. 5,060,772 18. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION/PREAPPUCATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPUCANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED. Type Name of Aulhoflled Reørese lattve S-L b. TiUe Jerry Sanders Chief of Police I Pr....'''u. EdIIIO,.. U'.bl.. 51.,.. ard Fotm 4241REV. 4.12) Alllho'llecI 10' loCi 1 R..ptodllcl,on Prucrib.d tIy OMS Ci,cular "'.1:'2 · c:-::u-~:) . IU·;:~ \.I..U..- ·"1·J, 1, ~t." In :U.'Ult' (;,.IJJFORNtA tlOICO Ad""¡"¡"lrotlon MnuoI ~ TImo 6ub<olol Toto' ^ T7,f1XJ 00% 69.300 101.700 I :J6,f1XJ 00% ~.= B. 18.1 90% 18,367 7.300 00% 66<2 ZI.OO9 Aet:HCy TOTAL 12_.709 LESS: 163 f1XJ¡ N;'/ C",,",'~"'" R_.forFYOO 6t.709 CBAO :Support S4n [);ogo Po/Iea Oopt. Operol!cnoo Support NomoIPosition Annuo/ " Torno 5"""""1 Total , ^ P...""""", 25.ii:x, I ::: rSY""""'AtWY"t SO.f1XJ ~ 25.f1XJ O. Travel NGnCOt1( 2 1.200 2.= SW8 Coot 2 500 1.f1XJ v.oriouo 6 1.200 7,200 v.nou. 10 500 5.f1XJ mil~ 1,800 17.400 Oeocrip1!on Periodiº-'Y ¡Unit Subtotal Totol E. Focditleo Ron! & Ubl 9 1.250 11250 11.250 F. Servic... I T olophono 9 1.f1XJ 9. f1XJ 15.f1XJ 1 Vochlclo løa... 12 500 6.000 G. EqUJ~nt mlnOt' uipment 1 1.000 1.000 1,f1XJ I H. Supplies paper. pone, sic 6 1.000 8,f1XJ 8Oft'wgre 1 5,100 SH)(J 11.100 I. Other CootR ¡"";"Ing 1 2,500 2,500 82.500 I PrOCOSGing COGt 1 eo.f1XJ 80,000 AGENCY TOTAl. 1.:3,250 lESS: 1"8 f1XJ) Req~ fe, FY 96 95,250 CBAG Support SUMM^RV 8U8RECIPIENT TOTAL 110109 Chulo Vløta Polfco Døpl 61.709 Son Diego poac., Dopt. 95.250 TOTAL lU,959 P~gð 13 Attachment C CBAG PROPOSED POSITIONS Object ~I Proposed Use ¡ Account 5101 $27,500 CBAG Coordinator for Ops/lntel...Salary , Total'Retirement :Contributiõn ~ 5141 $3,020 - ~ 5142 $2,773 Flex Plan Annual Cost 5143 $327 Medicare Contribution 5144 $196 Workers Compensation $101 Life Insurance $266 Long Term Disability TOTAL $29,182 Total Compensation Jan. 1 - June 30, 1997 I I $584 I 2% Processing Fee I $29,766 I TOTAL COST JAN. 1 - JUNE 30, 1997 , Object ~I Proposed Use I Account 5101 $18,031 CBAG Deputy Director 5141 $2,322 Total Retirement Contribution 5142 $1,506 Flex Plan Annual Cost 5143 $251 Medicare Contribution 5144 $150 Workers Compensation $50 Life Insurance $204 Long Term Disability TOTAL $22,514 Total Compensation July 1 - Sept. 30, 1996 ! ! $436 I 2% Processing Fee I TOTAL $22,950 TOTAL COST JULY 1 - SEPT. 30, 1996 n_ ~--- oF " (R,v. z.e.) ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT l'.S. Otf'ice of Personn.' Jw&vIaçemenc fPM CN..., 331 Title IV of the Intergovemmenlel Peraonnel Act of 1970 (5 U.S,C, 3371 .3376) INSTRUCTIONS This agreemont constitutes tho written record of tho obligations Whhln 30 daya of tho effoctive date of tho ..slgnmont, I and responsibililles 01 the parties to a tomporary ..a¡gomeol copies of thla form muat be aent to: arranged undor the provisions of the Intergovernmental U.S. Office of Peraonnel Management Personnel Act of 1970. Peraonnel Mobility Ptogram Staffing OpøratÏ9n. Divl.ionlCEG The term 'Stato or local government," when appearing on thle 1900 E Street, NW lorm, also relers to an In.tltutlon of higher education, an Indian Washington, D.C. 20415 t,ibal government, and any other eligible organization. Ptocedur.1 que.tlona on comploting the assignment agrøement form or On other aspect. relaling 10 the mobility program Copies or the completed and signod agreement should be should be addressed to either mobility program coordinators In each Federal agency or to the ataff of tha Peraonnel Mobility rerelned by each signatory. .- Ptogram. fn--,he U.S: Office of Per~onnel M.nagemen!1.~ .' ~~/.:' LI ~~ I ~;~~~:::-;"~'._~~~;.!:~(:~::~-~~¡:-a~.~;£f~J.'.'¡"'~':~', 1. CMck Appropriet. Box o New Agreement ,. , , " . 2. Nam. (LasL First, Middle) PAPANIA, RONALD N. 4. Home Addrøu (SlffUlf, City, SLIts. ZIP Cods) 6... A. Hav. you 8VQr been on a mobility ...ignmenl? 4027 Risa Circle :¡ San Diego CA 92124 ð. . B. II "YES", dar. or each ...¡gnment tMonlh and Y.e,) Ñom 0 i. Federal Agency (Llsl ottlce. bU,eau o,o,gantzaUonat unit wh~ Is party '0 7. State or Local Government (Idsnd(y the governmenlal agency) Ihf1lgf~~mel?t) Dept of Justice/Office of the u.s. Attorney Chula Vista Police Department S.I. as.lgnment being made Ihrough a laculty rellows program? YES X NO If "YES", give name of th. program. 11. Office Telephone Number (Include 1M Area Coda) 619-557-5324 (x14) 13. Federal Employees (Check app,oprlate box.) . [J ~areer Comp,tWve Grade Level Original Date Employed by lI1e Slale Oll1er /Speclfy): or Local Go....rnm.nt (Month, D.y. Ye.,) ·~6.9. 207 12-23-95 C. POIlUon To Which Aulgnment Will Be Made - 15. Employment Office Name and Addre.. (St,eel, City, Slate and ZIP Code) 16. As,lgnee'l Position Tille 17. Office Telephone Number DOJ/Office of the U.S. Attorney Deputy Director (tnc/ude the Area Code) 880 Front Street, Rm 6293 Budget & Fiscal 619-557-5324 (x14) San Diego ClI 92101-8893 1B.lmmediatÐ Supervisor (Name sI'1d Tlt/Il) Terry Srni th Executive Director Prcvlous .duro" Is uubl. sa 69..105 2'd ;0~3Ia N~S 0 ~ 5 n W~8E:60 C:H:;, r-t J.Jnr . 19. Check App,oprllll eo,"" 20. Portod 01 Aulgnmlnl (MotIIh, Day, y..,) r On dtlal/ (rom a Fodoral ag.noy ',om T. On leave without pay from a Federal 8gency two years X On dttaJllD I F.dtralogenq On aooolntment In I Federel8 en " . : . . . . . : 21. Indicolo th. 'a"ona lor thi. mobRity oulgnm.nl8nd dlocu.. how the woll< wnl benenttha potÛc:ipa~ng gOll!lmmenls. 'n oddltlon, IndlClle how tho employee will be utilized at th<> compledon ot thIs aulgnm.nl . - To enhance the combined efforts of local, state, and Federal government to provide effective law enforcement to the citizens of San Diego and Imperial Counties, and enhance the war on drugs and violence. , ....,.. - filJM...G;L·}'~·~--.-....~_~-) ,:'¡;-, .~~i"---!!':~_~-:i~~I:::_~_?·~~i.~.'·u ~~~.ø~~li1__)¡",:.;:'I·~':.¡¡·,:::t/1_~A:·~'::~::"=,,-I\ :=Cc='O~ 22. Uat the major duties and f8sponi.lblfiUes to be pertormed whUe on the mobllit)' 8&1IgnmenL The Deputy Director of Budget and Fiscal is responsible for the financial management of HIDTA funds for planning, programming, budgeting, internal auditing, and reporting. Develops grsnt programs; prepares, submits, administers, and implements' grants. 24. Speclsf Pay Conditiono (tndical. .ny condlllons fhat could Ina....Ih. 8n1gnsd Imp/oyee'. compens8rJon during th. B!lsignment period) 69 207 None 25. leave ProoAslons (Indicate th. annu.1 end sick /..ve benent. for which Ih. a,,'gnod smp/oy.. i. .Iigibl.. Specify /h. prøc.dura. for ropøt1lng, reqf.1.s"ng and r.cordlng .Uch leavo.) Subject to annual and sick leave benefits provided by parent agency to which he.will comply . Page 2 _.- E"d iO~3Ia N~S 0 ~ S n W~6£:6Ø 96, £t Nnf .--_... ----- ---- .- .-.- 0" . : . t fdenli wher.8 ro rlate th. office to which ¡nvorceland' dme and attendance reecnb Ihould be að"t 26. Foderal Ageney Obr.ga~on. (It payfng mo", than SlJ porçenl 01. Ftlde,al 27, Slat. 0' Local Go",",nrnent Ageney Obliga~ona employe.', ,alary beYOfld. 6·monlh poriod. ,pacIfy (dona/.Ioreo." .hatlng døc/slon.) Federa1'Hiqh Intensity Drug Trafficking Benefits and B~lary to be paid by Chu1a Area (HIDTA) or other Federal funds will Vista Police Department reimburse salary and benefits to Chula Vista Police Department. , .' . .. o 28. Apprïcable FGderal, Slate or local conftic(.o(.lnlerest laws have been reviewed with the employee to assure that connicl:-of.fnterest aituatjons do not Inadver1en~y arise du,lng thl. a..lgnmenl ill 2g, The employe. has be.n notifi.d 01 law., rul.. and ,egulatlon., and po/lcle. on employe. oonduct which apply 10 himhle, whil. on this assignment 31. State Of Local Agency Benefit. (Indlcale alt SIal. ""'ployee benefits that . win be relalned by th. SI.le Of loca/ol/flncy employe. being .../gned to A. FQderal Employees Group Ute Insurance a Federal agsncy. AJ~o Include a ,t"/tlmllnl c8rlifying coverage In aU St.t. and local employee beneHt P'O{I''''"s thaI". .Iecled by the Fed- wlal employe. on JeQvø without psy from the Federal aQøncy to a Slats B. Federal Civu SelVice Retirement System or Federal Emproyees or loellt .g.ney.) Re~rement System Coyered NIA C. Federa' Employee Health Benents '. 32. Other Benefits (indjçsle any other employeø bÐnefits to be made part 01 thi~ agnu~mflnt) It .ill ~nder..tood ~hat .Hr. Papania is eovered under Chapter 73 of 5 Use (su1tab11ity, Becur~ty, conduct), Chapter 81 of 5 use (workerll' oompensation) a~d 28 use 2671-2680 (tort claims, sexual haras.ment, BEO). Certai~ m~.ce11aneous expenlles may be provided as individually authori..d by the U S Attor~ey Office in accordance with øeparate wReimburQQment Agreement Betw~Q. Aqenou.., Form !)CJ-216". . ...._...... _. . n ~'PÌ:r:·\'J~"~~:L.l:"(~~I' ~i~?:æ' 33. Indicate: (1) Whether the Federalageney Of State Of locaI.gooey wiU pay ltayeland tran.porta~on e.penae. 10, tram, and during the ...ignmonIBS spe<:ifiad in Chapter 334 of the Fede..1 Personnel Manual, and (2) which Irayel and relooaUon expen.e. win belnc:lvded. . Official business travel expenses, authorized in advance bY the U.S. Attorney's office, _. will be paid by Federal government. No relocation expenses authorized" Page 3 þ'd iO~3Ia N~S 0 ~ 5 n W~6E:60 96, E. Nnr ~rtlJ .., f{.}~ ~~ ~'llCl5iE~~ j¡~\.--:----~;:---~~~.._¥1,..:_:\-_i-l.I'·'\'~_'-11::-:~:-~. .,-.,,~-;,.;::--__~-~.:::~-:.'~,-:J-~-"'-~ ~-~:~~=.~.:}-:,:"="-_-:::-:"~~~~::----~:...",,:._=-~ ~ i 4. Check Appropriate Boxes D A. The rules Bnd policies governIng \he Internal operadon and management 0 O. I have boon Informed of eppllc:.nble provision. Ihol.ld my . of the agønG)' to which my assignment Is made under this agreement will be posl~on wilh my permanent employer become .vbjec:t (0 a ob..",ed by me. I'Rduc:tion·in·fotcl proœdurø. o B. I have 6ø,n informed that m)' usignment may be terminated at any 0 ... dme at the option of the Federal agency or the Slate or Jocal government. o C. I havD been Informed that any 1taveI and ttansportatlol"l expen.es covered from Feder.' agency appropriations may be I'8cc\IØ(ablø as 8 debl due the United States, if I do not UNe unlil the Gomplelion of my anignment (unlen terminaled earUer by either employ.r) or one year, whIchever i. shoner. 3S. Date (Month, Day, Y.",) U. S. At:t:orney From T. 38. DalÐ 01 Signature (Month, Day, Year) " In signing this agreement, we eor1l(y that: - the description of duties and responsibilities is current and fully and accurately doscribes those of the a..igned employea; - this assignment Is being enterad Into to serve a sound, mutual public purpose end not solely for the employee's benefit; - at the completion of the assignment, the participating employee will be returned to the position he or she occupied at the time this agreement was entered Inlo or a position or like senlorily, statu. Bnd pay. Stale or Locel Government Agenoy Federal Agency 39. Signature 01 Authorizing OHloer 40. Slgnalurv of AuthorizIng OtTlcor 4 f, Date of Signature (Month, Dgy, rut) 42, Dato of SI9nature (Month, uoy, r.or) ~3. Typed Name and Title 44. Typed Name end Titlo PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Sections 3373 and 3374, Assignment of Employees To or agenelss, or by State, local, or Federal it\coms taxing From State or Local Governments, of Title 5, U.S. Code, agencle.. authorizes collection of this information. The data will be used primarily to formally document and record your temporary Solicitation of your Social Security Number (SSN) is authorized assignment to or from a State or local government, Institution by Executive Order 9397, which permitted u.e of the SSN as of higher education, Indian tribal government, or other eligible an Identifier of Individual record. maintained by Federal organization. This inlormation may also b.. used as the legal agencies. Furnishing your SSN or any other data requested Is basis for personnel and financial transaction., to identify you voluntary. Howevet, failure to provide any of the requested when requesting lnrormatlon about you, e.g., from prior information may result in your being ineligible for par:icipation employere, educational Instilutions, or law enforcement In Ihe Intergovernmental Assignmont Program. Page 4 ..- 'Q'U,$. OOViRN ,(ENT ÞRtNTINQ OFFICE: 'a.e~9A S'd ;O~3Ia N~S 0 ~ 5 n W~0Þ:60 %, £1: Nnf u.s. Department of Justice Bar Code 1 Reimbursement Agreement Between Agencies Provider Agency Customer Agency Provider Cost Center RCN Description Customer Number Customer Alias 5-15010004 Provider Contact Phone ustomcr Contact Phone Captain Dan Wolf (619) 691-5262 ane Duarte, 619/557-6476 Budget Officer Name Name (if billing address is different, specity on reverse side.) City of Chula Vista, Chula Vista Police ffice of the United States Attorney Department , Address Address - ~ - 276 4th Avenue 880 Front Street, Room City City Chula Vista San rief explana/ion of work or services /0 be performed and basis for detumining COSI: The United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of California, agrees to reimburse the City of Chula Vista, Chula Vista Police Department, for contract employment of the Deputy Director, Chief BUdget/Fiscal Officer for the California Border Alliance Administration HIDTA. Salary and benefits are estimated as follows: Salary $18,000 Benefits 4,500 Processing fee (2t) 450 Total: $22,950 Billings will be monthly based on actual expenses. Estimated amount (Anach additional sheet for continuation of uplana/ion, q necessary.) $22,950 :¡'H;fi¡¡Wiíß1;í¡1ì~ß%ft¡1ì\\.1m¡jjîfÆ;iK\î\fj%ªi¡n¡%îMMI¡;W~tW¡¡fim$l!im~íî¡!i\Wffiì~¡.l¡fØfi.::1·¡¡¡%¡¡l¡lft¡¡:M¡¡i1\¡[j@¡'Œi11ì;iif¡:¡~¡Ii\%iijjW%'W¡¡¡¡W;@¡¡¡'I¡ (Customer agency will indicate account to be charged. Federal agencies will be billed OPAC, except for the OBDs, USMS & DOD.) Agency Location Code pproprialion Symbol Cost Center/SaC to be Charged YRegDoc 15010004 1550322 6E4096110298 SOC 1190 (for OBD and USMS only) (See reverse side of form.) Approved for Provider Office: Approved for Customer Office: OrgalÚzation Organization City of Chula Vista, Chula Vista Police Office of the United States Attorney Department Signarure . itle City Manager, City of Chula Vista Attorney FORM DOI-216 OCTOBER 1993 Job Specification California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) Deputy Director, Fiscal and Budget Salary: $69,207 The incumbent serves as the Deputy Director for the California Border Alliance Group Executive Committee representing 22 federal, state and municipal law enforcement agencies in San Diego and Imperial Counties. The incumbant is responsible to the CBAG Executive Director and participates fully with the Director, Chair and Vice-Chair regarding management issues, the nature. complexity and volume of which require frequent program and resource direction. Th'e incumbent manages the administration of High Intensity Drug TraNicking Area CHIOTA) fiscal and budget and, as such. conducts studies, develops policies and procedures, and implements plans to enhance HIDTA programs and to ensure compliance with the Office of National Drug Control Policy. , Duties include but are not limited to: Developing overall'plans and Obje~tjves to acco~plish t~e HIOTA program; setting priorjtie~ and preparing schedules for completion of work; assigning work and evaluating the perfonnance of employees; making decisions on"'Work problems presented by subordinates; providing requirements and descriptions 01 the work to be accomplished; planning and establishing work schedules, deadlines and standards for acceptable work; coordinating and integrating multiple agencies' work and processes as it relates to HIDTA; tracking progress and quality 01 performance; deciding on the acceptability, rejection or correction 01 work products 01 services and similar matters that may affect payment from HIDTA lunds; responsible lor establishing policies and procedures and the directing and supervising of operating elements to provide the resource required to support HIDTA's mission; financial management of HIDTA funds tor planning, programming, budgeting, internal auditing, and reporting; developing grant programs'; preparing, submitting, administering and implementing these grants; developing and executing short. and long-range resource planning and programming required for accomplishment of HIDTA's mission; providing guidance and direction to interagency and intergovernmental organizations and task forces in the preparation of inquires and reports, providing technical assistance and training to staff and grantees; overseeing the development, presentation and execution of the HIDTA budget and financial goals; developing the Fiscal Policies and Procedures and is a member at the Fiscal and Reprogramming Sut>Committee; developing interagency agreements/memorandum of understandings, reviewing and/or approving all State and Local invoices, and chairing fi~al technical working group; overseeing personnel function of the office; and other related duties as required. This position is a term appointment established to temporarily assist the U.S. Attorney's Office in its role to help establish counter.drug task forces associated with the District's designation as a High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA). Establishment of these task ·orces and acquisition of grants and temporary tunding sources to support these task require more administrative expertise than is available in the U.S. Attorney's Office. The life span at the task forces and this position is temporary, and will exist in only until crug trafficking in the San Diego/Imperial Counties area is eradicated or shifts to another region of the United States. or until the City of Chula Vista declines to participate in HIDTA or, without cause, terminates this position. The City of Chula Vista is the Fiscal Agent for this position. The incumbent is an employee of the City of Chula Vista. California, on loan to United States Government. Therefore, the incumbent is an "Unclassified/At.WiJl Employee" of the City of Chula Vista subject entirely to the continuation, and receipt by Chula Vista, or HIDTA funding designated for the salaries and benefits of this position. Unclassifi:dIAt- WiJ/ employees of the City ot Chula Vista are subject to unilateral termination at any time, ror any reason determined appropriate by the Chief at Police of the City at Chula Vista. The incumbent shall not: violate any federal, state or local law, statue or ordinance. or conduct their personal or professional affairs in an inappropriate manner; act in contravention of a policy decision by the City Council. City Manager or Chief of Police of the City or Chula Vista; perform the duties ot this position in an unsatisfactory manner; acquire conflicts at interest as defined by the California Fair Political Practices Commission without obtaining the prior approval of the City of Chula Vista; or, make, cause or acquire knowledge of any change to the Intergovernmental Personal Act Agreement governing this position without notifying the City Attorney 01 the City of Chula Vista, who may, at his/her unilateral discretion approve or disapprove any such change. Acknowledged: (Signature) (pnnt Name Legibly) (LJate) r Job Specification California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) Coordinator for Operations/Intelligence Policy, Plans, and Program Requirements Salary: $44,760 - $58-193 The Coordinator for Operations/lntelligence Policy, Plans and Program Requirements reports to the Executive Director ot the California Border Alliance Group, and coordinates policies, programs, intelligence and operational requirements in support ot the Southern District ot California High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area and associated campaign plans. This position requires a Bachelor's degree, and postgraduate education in the Intellegence field is preterred. This position also requires ten (10) years experience in progressively responsible positions in the areas ot intellegence and operational planning. Knowledge and experience In both Intelligence and Law Enforcemet't Intelligence support, along with exceÌtent interpersonal, oral and written communication skills are required. .:' .' ::- Duties include: Identifying and coordinating operational initiatives; developing and Intelligence Architecture tormulti.agency information sharing and interoperability; coordinating tederal, state and local intelligence for the tormulation ot plans and strategies in support ot the regional counter-narcotics effort; coordinating strategic and operational-level intelligence analysis and assessments including trend and pattern analysis tor the development ot guidance and policies; identifying intelligence gaps and corrective action as necessary; developing and implementing a joint Intelligence Collection Requirements Management architecture. including request, validation, and tasking mechanisms tor collection and reporting by appropriate agency; and other related duties as required. This position is a term appointment established to temporarily assist the U.S. Attorney's Office in its role to help establish counter-drug task forces associated with the District's designation as a High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA). Establishment of these task forces and acquisition ot grants and temporary tunding sources to support these task require more administrative expertise than is available in the U.S. Attorney's Office. The lite span ot the task forces and this position is temporary, and will exist in only until drug trafficking in the San Diego/Imperial Counties area is eradicated or shifts to another region ot the United States, or until the City ot Chula Vista declines to participate in HIDT A or, without cause, terminates this position. The City ot Chula Vista is the Fiscal Agent tor this position. The incumbent is an employee ot the City of Chula Vista, Calitornia, on loan to United States Government. Therefore, the incumbent is an "Unclassified/At-Will Employee" of the City of Chula Vista subject entirely to the continuation, and receipt by Chula Vista, of HlDT A tunding designated for the salaries and benefits ot this position. Unclassified/At-Will employees of the City ot Chula Vista are subject to unilateral termination at any time, for any reason determined appropriate by the Chiet of Police of the City ot Chula Vista. The incumbent shall not: violate any federal, state or local law, statue or ordinance, or conduct their personal or protessional affairs in an inappropriate manner; act in contravention ot a policy decision by the City Council. City Manager or Chief of Police of the City of Chula Vista; perform the duties ot this position in an unsatistactory manner; acquire contlicts ot interest as defined by the California Fair Political Practices Commission without obtaining the prior approval ot the City of Chula Vista; or, make, cause or acquire knowledge of any change to the Intergovernmental Personal Act Agreement governing this position without notifying the City Attorney of the City ot Chula Vista, who may, at his/her unilateral discretion approve or disapprove any such change. Acknowledge: (Signature) (Print Name Legibly) (Uate) u__ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /C? Meeting Date 7 /16/96 ITEM TITLE: R I' /8".:J¿,ç. S D' d I . eso utlOn grantmg easement to an tego Gas An E ectric Company to place guy pole and ancho within City's Municipal Golf Course SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work~ Director of Parks and Recrea' REVIEWED BV, C"" M=g~G¡ ~ (41'.... Vo", V~ _ NoX) San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG has -;;quested an easement trom the City to install a guy pole and anchor on the eastern edge of the golf course. Please refer to Exhibit "A" for approximate location. The City Council must authorize the granting of the easement by adoption of a resolution and signing of the grant deed by the Mayor. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the subject resolution granting an easement to San Diego Gas and Electric Company, have the Mayor sign the easement documents on behalf of the City and direct the City Clerk to return the signed document to SDG&E. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: No action by City Boards or Commissions is necessary in this matter. DISCUSSION: The County of San Diego is nearing the start of reconstruction of the intersection of Bonita Road and Central A venue. As part of this project, SDG&E must relocate a portion of its overhead electrical lines in the area. This alteration necessitates placing a pole and anchor wire in the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course property. Due to the location of the new poles and the configuration of the overhead lines on the east side of Bonita Road, a guy pole and wire anchor must be installed on the west side to help support one of those poles. The pole must be installed within the City's golf course property. The proposal is to place it on the west side of the jogging trail with a guy wire anchored in the ground to the west of the pole. The pole and anchor cable will not interfere with golfing activities, since it is at the edge of the course, in a treed area, and outside the "nonnal" playing area. Staff contacted American Golf, the lessee of the Golf Course, and they are in concurrence with the requested easement. The easement for these facilities is proposed to be four feet wide by approximately 45 feet long. (The length is such so that the pole and anchor are ouside the jogging trail.) The wire crossing Bonita Road will be approximately 24 feet above the roadway and not be a hazard to the public. It is not an electrical line, merely a support cable. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts are anticipated. Attachments: Exhibit A - Locator plat [M:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\SDGEESMT.JWH] Engineering File No: 0490-60-PF-245 Easement deed /~./cv-::< 1\( " RESOLUTION NO. JK3¿f RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA GRANTING EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY TO PLACE GUY POLE AND ANCHOR WITHIN CITY'S MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE WHEREAS, San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E) has requested an easement from the City to install a guy pole and anchor on the eastern edge of the golf course at a location shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council must authorize the granting of the easement by adoption of a resolution and signing of the grant deed by the Mayor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula Vista does hereby grant an easement in the manner and form set forth in Exhibit "A" to San Diego Gas and Electric Company to place guy pole and anchor within city's Municipal Golf Course. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the easement documents on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to return the signed document to SDG&E. Presented by Approved as to form by (L- v¡ 111.~ John P. Lippitt, Director of Ann Y. Moore, Interim Public Works Attorney C:\rs\easelent.sdg //P'J ".-., ij - u._._ _ - I I ì . , I tS J - ~ I I / ,/ ~ .; -- ". -- I . k ¡:;~ 'f". . ~ /~-' - ". I ~~ ~ r~.. "" ~ oiPr'" "< . I %1' '\ ". I .. ~ .. ..." t::::J ... · ", I ' ~ ~ff. ~,~~ ~ ~~ÅI.&:..-: ø¡. ~ GIIYW#?' (A""(!j 1 I I 5/JðjECT 4' \.J:- pOt.£ I I RELOC,4 TED PoL.E EA SGM~NT . ~ FILE NO. PF -245 DWN BY: J~ EXHIBIT II At! lð--( , ì.·1 I . DATE: (,/171'~ .. .' - -.-..-----. --- ... · "~~!:''.. Recording Requested by ¡J/rA/!- ,L"/;.-: - f--A' , /ri1v.."¿ ,-, San Diego Gas & Electric Company ..'...... I ¡!'''- , /,j /'/C'í, i' /. ; L . 71fi ' .' c ~j,·,"l "J When recorded, mail to: 6'Jt ,r/-il' .: t~--:J i ..,/'", '- ~ "-' - c:' c.ø .-,,- San Diego Gas & Electric Company en --< ~ Ç) -c.. P.O. Box 1831 ~ Z 0;, San Diego, CA 92112 r- m"rr. - ,Tl (") C) Attn: Office Services, EB 5 .Q ::o:r: fT\ z~< \~) r ff~ ¡.. C SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USI:: rT, ::: .. -u ,n Project No.: 604149-040 to.) - - 2546642 Transfer Tax ~ " N t- Const. No.: APN No.: 593-240-24 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRlC COMPANY EASEMENT CITY OF CHULA VISTA, A MVNICIPAL CORPORATlONhereinafter called "Grantor", grants to SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRlC COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter called "Grantee", an easement and right of way to erect, construct, change the size of, improve, reconstruct, relocate, repair, maintain and use facilities consisting of: Guy poles and/or anchors together with connecting wires to support that certain pole line located upon or adjacent to Grantor's land, together with the right of ingress thereto and egress therefrom over said easement and over other practical routes across Grantor's land situated in the County of San Diego, State of California. That portion of Quarter Section 47 of Rancho De La Nacion, according to Map thereof No. 166 filed in the office of the County Recorder of said County of San Diego; described in a Deed recorded January 15, 1974 at Recorder's File/Page No. 19905 of Official Records of said County of San Diego. The said easement in the aforesaid land shall be 4.00 feet in width, the centerline of which shall be the centerline ofthe facilities as installed on Grantor's property, the approximate location being shown and delineated on the Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Grantor will exercise only such reserved rights in said land as will not interfere with or prohibit the free and complete use and enjoyment by Grantee, its' successor or assigns, of the rights hereby granted. Grantee shall have the right to top, cut, remove, or trim interfering plants and trees, and to keep said easement free from and to prevent any person, including Grantor and successors and assigns, ITom erecting, placing, or storing on said easement any flammable or other hazards and any structures, objects, or earth fills/cuts or other obstructions, except walls and fences. H:\R\D6.dot..BAJ /~'-5 ' , _u__ .. . . @ ANITA .-rREET [ IJImJ . r ., 1111'111 , CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT . ë) ~, ""'......... IIQKI' .........""" REZONE I CONDlftONAL USE PERMIT =, 4111441 0. ....... llllllleIt:" _hm I2PiD MHP and CUP '11 a Vallan iD add ... iD '~-I mobile home paIIc. ICAII: III...... ' . ' NORTH No leale P'CZ.., PCO","7 '.EXHIBIT A J tf) "-.5C¡ Î , , The legal description for this easement was prepared by San Diego Gas & Electric Company pursuant to Section 8730 ofthe Business and Professions Code, State of California. CITY OF CHULA VISTA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION By r By Prepared by Hildebran Date 5/09/96 State of California ) County of San Diego) On , before me, ' Notary Public, personally appeared proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in hislherltheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislher/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Wl1NESS my hand and official seal. ~1I.Il.~~ (91( ? ~ G-,.-~ H:\R\D6.doL,BAJ I¿J-¿ . - ) Tìì- \ 5 5. \-\0 LÐ So k..DC/:¡ "t"IO,.V C? r- POLE~ 1'\ 'FïE \"L lLD A ì.\ ~\ Ip ~Ð\)C¡; l\t.6ùT. / N ..... \>-.) ./ / v ,,~i'< c..~ ~ -- / ./ \ Iltg c. ~~ r.:! N~W u:>C-. . ) ? "(d.d-C Ù ~ ~ I ¡:; I o~ , = " - 1: ~ ~g C!Tý ÓP Ole/fA 0..JrA ,.. I I- 00 I . i d: I - ~~ ~= .40/ 1-;5-7,d '" I J.9¿J5 ^ I ¿, ;;1\ ,- j =- \J a ~~ CoOL P- Z ì ~ iíg - I ¡¡ LOUQ%.. 1.1 ~ J I 0 , i '1 J n e 0 ... I z 7Q.c)(r,'.t I) ~ '" 3 ~ .... IJ t. uJ z '" 0 c: ..,;.\..1& POL-I<:" ¿ n .... uJla~i"T AL) ~ Õ _ ?o\e. z I 0 1~51tS '" éAJé1l1b/í ~64- c m ~ '" 0 z " !< P ~ ' ~ \5. IS. is ~ (.u'i UJ, 11..£ C>IJI..: ~ e I ... A??QIN. ~ ;: " EX.JIBIY"A~ ~ ô I ~ d4. ~ T 1\ ~CI'¡~ ~ '" ~ I< S! /tJ.-7 ~[) m I < is œ œ . ,,:; ~""- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /1 Meeting Date 7/16/96 ITEM TInE: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of the following applications filed by Rancho Del Rey Partnership for 156 acres located on the south side of East "H" Street between Paseo Ranchero and Del Rey Boulevard within the Rancho Del Rey Planned Community. a. PCM-96-09: Amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, General Development Plan, Planned Community District Regulations, Residential Design Guidelines, Water ConselVation Plan and Air Quality Improvement Plan. b. PCS-96-05: Tentative Subdivision Map Chula Vista, Chula Vista Tract 96-06. Resolution /r:Jl,tAmending the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan changing Parcel R-7 land use designation from Specialty Housing (SH) to Single Family Detached (SFI') and Single Family Attached (SFA); approving Tentative Subdivision Map For 156 acres at the Rancho Del Rey SPA III, Lhula Vista Tract 96-06 and adopting addendum to FEIR 89-10. Ordinance .)./, Y ¿, Amending the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area Plan Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use Districts Map. SUBMITfED BY: Director of Planning ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-X) The applicant, Rancho Del Rey Investments L.P., has requested amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, General Development Plan, Planned Community District Regulations, Residential Design Guidelines, Water ConselVation Plan and Air Quality Improvement Plan. The purpose of these amendments is to change the land use designation of parcel R-7 from Residential Specialty Housing (SP) to Single Family Detached (SFD) and Residential Duplex/fownhomes (SFA) (see Exhibit B). The Specialty Housing designation was intended to allow for a senior housing project. The documents affected by the amendments, as proposed to be revised, have been provided for your consideration and approval (see Sections 3-6 in the book). I/-j ..-.--..---.---.------.- Page 2, Item 1/ Meeting Date: 7/16/96 The proposal also includes a Tentative Subdivision Map application to subdivide 156 acres located on the south side of East "H" Street between Paseo Ranchero and Del Rey Boulevard within the Rancho Del Rey Planned Community and P-C Zone District. The subdivision site includes 86 acres for residential development (Parcel R-7) and 70 acres of open space (OS-l) (see LocatorlExhibit A, G and H). The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new or supplemental EIR is necessary and has prepared an addendum to EIR-89-1O, Rancho Del Rey SPA III, which must be considered and adopted by the City Council prior to a decision on the project (see attachment 4). RECOMMENDATION: That The City Council adopt the Resolution approving the proposed Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendment (PCM-96-09) and Tentative Subdivision Map for Rancho Del Rey Partnership L.P., Chula Vista Tract 96-05, based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed therein. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On June 26, 1996, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 (Salas absent; Davis abstained) to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Tentative Subdivision Map in accordance with Resolution PCM-96-09/ PCS-96-05 attached hereto (Attachment 3). DISCUSSION: 1. Site Characteristics The subject site, which consists of the 86 acre parcel R-7 and 70 acres of open space (Parcel OS-l), is located on the south side of East "H" Street between Paseo Ranchero and Del Rey Boulevard within the Rancho Del Rey planned community (see Locator/ Exhibit A). Parcel R-7 was graded as part of the Rancho Del Rey SPA III mass grading program. The remaining 70 acres are open space lots including the south leg of Rice Canyon located immediately to the south and west. The project site is limited to the soutÌI and west by single family dwellings, to the north by a commercial center across East "H" Street, and to the east by a church and single family dwellings across Paseo Ranchero. A two hundred and fifty foot wide SDG&E easement bisects diagonally across the site. / I-:L --,,_. ..~'" -.---'"_.-.---_.- Page 3, Item ~ Meeting Date: 7/16/96 2. SPA Land Use Designations and Existing Land Use. RDR SPA III Land Use Existing Designation Land Use Site SH, Specialty Housing Vacant OS, Open Space Open Space North (across East "H" St C, Commercial Commercial Ctr. West R-lHP, Single Single Family Family detached, Detached East CPF Community Purpose Church/ SFD and M-23,Single Family Detached 3. Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendment General Development Plan The General Development Plan, Text and statistical tables are proposed to be amended to reflect the following requested changes in land use designation, land use designation boundaries, project density, maximum number of pennitted dwelling units and pennitted residential types (see Exhibit B): · Change Parcel R-7 land use designation from Specialty Housing (SH) to Single Family Detached-Cottages (SFD) and Single Family Attached Duplex! Townhomes (SFA). · Reduce the number of pennitted dwelling units from 588 specialty units to 300 single family detached-cottages and 220 single Family attached - Duplex!townhomes (520 units total). · Reduce Parcel R-7 overall density from 6.7 to 6.5 du/ac and · Reduce the total number of dwelling units in the SPA from 1380 to 1312 (-68). /1-- 3 ! Page 4, Item / / Meeting Date: 7/16/96 Site Utilization Plan Parcel R-7 is proposed to be divided into three new parcels. Parcels R-7a, R-7b and R-7c. Each parcel is intended to be developed under a different small lot standard to produce single family detached and duplex housing products. The target housing type, parcel acreage, target density and pennitted number of units per individual parcel are shown in comparison with the adopted plan in Table, Exhibit E. Land Use Districts The proposed amendments request to change the land use designation of Parcel R-7 from RSP, Residential Specialty Housing District to R-P, Residential Planned Concept for Parcels R-7a and R-7b, and R-C, Residential Condominium for Parcel R-7c (see Exhibit F). These new land use designations would add duplex (zero lot line) housing to the adopted SPA housing mix. As a result of the proposed land use changes and the introduction a duplex lot product (zero lot line), the Pennitted Land Use Matrix and the Residential Property Development Standards of the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Planned Community District Regulations are proposed to be modified to delete the Specialty Housing regulations and add development criteria for certain aspects of the proposed small lot and duplex product (see Section 3 in the book). However, not all aspects of the proposed small lot development have been included in the proposed amendments. Thus, staff recommends that the following specific property development standards be adopted for this project: UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 · Min Lot Area (sq. ft.) 3,850 3,%0 2,720 · Min Lot Width (lin. ft) Regular shape lot 55 44 32 Panhandle shape Jot 25 25 n/a · Minimum Lot Depth 70 90 85 · Max Lot Coverage (%) 50 50 50 · Floor Area Ratio .60 .60 .70"** · Front Yard Setback (lin. ft.) (from public right of way) To garage 15 15 15 To Main Res 15 15 15 )/-f , /0 Jj '" Page 5, Item II Meeting Date: 7/16/96 · Side Yard Setback (lin. ft.) To adj. res. lot 10/3 10/3 1010'" Min. dist btwn units 10 10 20··· To adj. St. (cor. lot) 10 10 10 · Rear Yard Setback 15 15 15*···· · Max. BuiJding Height 28 28 28 · Parking Spaces/ Unit 2 car/gar 2 car/gar 2car/gar · Usable open spaceAot (sq. ft.) 750' 750' 750' · private open Space/ unit (percentage of lot area) 15%" 15%" 15%"'· · Guest Parking- on street Wot Wot Wot · Usable open space for each typical three or four bedroom dwelling, either exclusive in private yards. or in combination of private yards, landscaped front yards and/or common areas. .. Private usable fenced yard area shaH be no less than 15 percent of the lot size with no dimension less than 10 feet. ... May be modified with site plan approval provided the dimension is not Jess than seven feet. Five percent of the total number of dwelling units within an individuaJ neighborhood may use five foot setback. "'''''''- May be increased with site plan approval. *.... Rear Yard setback may be reduced to 10 ft. with site plan approval provided 15% of the lot area is stiIJ provided in private open space. Open Space The Tentative Subdivision map shows the recreational trails along East "H" Street from Paseo Ranchero to Del Rey Boulevard and the trails connecting the project with the southerly adjacent recreational trail. The applicant is required to install, as part of the project, all recreational trails within the project boundaries. Thus, in order to insure that the recreational trails are installed as prescribed in the SPA plan and comply with the City Standards for recreational trails, staff suggests that a detailed open space/ recreational trails plan incorporating the following items be submitted to the Planning Department and Engineering Division prior to approval of the first final map: II-,Ç , " Page 6, Item / I Meeting Date: 7/16/96 · Provide a minimum separation of ten feet from the face of curb to the recreational trails located along East "H" Street, except where physical constraints or ADA requirements do not allow it. · Submit and obtain approval of the usable open space facility proposed to be located within the SDG&E easement by the Directors of Parks and Recreation and Planning. Usable open space areas shall take into consideration the following design criteria in order to qualify for maintenance through open space maintenance district: Usable open space shall include the following components: a. Turf! landscaping b. sidewalks! trails c. Benches and tables The Following shall be excluded from usable open space areas: a. Picnic shelters b. Hard surface areas such as basketball courts c. any other structure prohibited by SDG&E · Submit a letter from SDG&E to the Parks and Recreation Department verifying that permission has been granted to develop the usable open space amenity within their easement. · Incorporate the usable open space located within the SDG&E easement into the project's open space maintenance district. · Include all roads and pedestrian trails within the SDG&E easement and Otay Water District property in the overall open space landscape irrigation plans. · Install a forty two inch (42") high decorative wall or railing along with landscaping where cul-de-sacs abut open space per Rancho Del Rey SPA III Fencing Design Guidelines. · Provide a minimum of ten feet wide landscaping strip along the eastern edge of the project abutting Paseo Ranchero and a minimum ten feet wide landscaping strip between curb and perimeter walls or edges abutting rights of way. I/-¿ ___ .....__~____.________' "'-_ ___.L·.__.L____...I_L__. _____,__"'- -'_"'-_ TTTI__ _1__________.._ __ ___________11.._ Page 7, Item / / Meeting Date: 7/16/96 · Submit water management guidelines in accordance with the Chula Vista Landscape Design Manual for all open space lots. · The landscaping fonnat for the project shall be in substantial confonnance with Section 6.4 (General Landscape Concept) of the Rancho Del Rey SPA III. · Provide a landscape buffer with an average width of 80 ft. and minimum dimension of 40 ft. along East "H" Street west of the SDG&E easement. This buffer area shall contain a 10 ft. wide recreation trail from Paseo Ranchero to the sewer access road and an eight ft. wide trail from the sewer access road to Del Rey Boulevard. Where necessary, include post and fence railing per Chula Vista Design Standards (CVDS). Landscape buffer design is subject to approval by the Director of Parks and Recreation and Planning. · Extend the proposed retaining wall and handrail as detennined by the City Engineer to provide a minimum of eight feet (8') clear sidewalk width. Residential Design Guidelines The Rancho Del Rey SPA III Residential Design Guidelines would be amended to remove the development and design criteria pertaining to the Specialty Housing and provide design guidelines for the three new small lot products (see Section 5 in the book). The amendments address most aspects of site design including the design of the 80 ft. landscaped buffer area along East "H" Street, special design criteria for each product and typical lot development guidelines. The design guidelines would have to be revised to reflect the recommended property development standards and provide specific architectural design criteria for all building elevations exposed to public streets and open space. The specific design guidelines should be incorporated in Section VI.8 of the Rancho Del Rey SPA III. Rancho Del Rey SPA III Water ConselVation Plan. Air Quality Improvement Plan As a result of the proposed amendments, minor statistical amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Air Quality Improvement Plan and Water ConselVation are being proposed to reflect updated project data. The documents, as proposed to be revised, have been included in the book (see Sections 5 and 5 of the book). )/-7 -. ,~-~-,._-...--.- Page 8, Item £ Meeting Date: 7/16/96 4. Tentative Subdivision Map The tentative subdivision map consists of subdividing 156 acres into three neighborhood (Units 1, 2 and 3) containing a total of 403 residential and 11 open space lots (see Exhibit G and H). The Neighborhoods or Units Subdivision designs feature lots with typical lot dimensions as follows: Unit I 55' X 70' lot area 3,850 sq. ft. Unit 2 44' X 90' lot area 3,960 sq. ft. Unit 3 32' X 85' lot area 2,720 sq. ft. Based on the recommended Property Development Standards, some of the lots do not meet the minimum width and depth dimensions. Thus, Staff has included conditions requiring that the subdivision design be revised to comply with the minimum property development standards (see tentative map condition No. 53 in the Draft City Council Resolution) prior to approval of the final map. For the eleven open space parcels, the applicant is required to provide landscape and irrigation plans as well as a water management program, and establish long term maintenance through an open space maintenance district. Also included in the open space maintenance district would be a usable open space area that the applicant is proposing within the SDG&E easement. A number of conditions pertinent to this type of project have been recommended by the Engineering, Fire, Parks and Recreation and Planning Departments as conditions of the tentative map. These conditions are listed in the Draft City Council Resolution. 5. AnalysIs The original SPA plan design envisioned a senior retirement community with amenities and a variety of housing types to accommodate a wide range of income levels for parcel R-7. However, after unsuccessfully seeking development proposals for this site and contacting several retirement community developers, the applicant has concluded that the site does not have the shape and acreage needed to accommodate the amenities necessary for a modern and successful retirement community. For this reason the applicant is seeking to change the land use designation to market the property with residential products that are more in J/- 8" Page 9, Item J.L Meeting Date: 7116196 demand at the present time and which would also enhance the variety of housing types being offered in Rancho Del Rey SPA III. The proposed three new neighborhoods function somewhat independently, but vehicular and pedestrian connections and a central passive open space area have been incorporated to provide an acceptable interior linkage. Additional pedestrian and vehicular connections also provide the necessary linkages to the remainder of the Rancho Del Rey Community Facilities. The Planning Department received a letter from a resident of the southerly adjacent residential nei¡¡hborhood known as Summer Ridge. The author of the letter expressed concerns about the number of SPA plan changes that McMillin has made in the area to the detriment of the surrounding neighborhoods property values. The resident recommends that the City direct the developer to build a quality senior citizen retirement community, as originally envisioned, instead of the residential development being proposed (see attachment 5). The staff does not concur with the above mentioned resident's concern primarily because, as mentioned above, the adopted Specialty Housing land use designation allows for a variety of housing types including single family detached and townhomes and could be developed with a similar housing product under the adopted land use designation. The project, in staffs opinion, has .been well adapted to the site and overall planned community. 6. Conclusion For the reasons noted above, staff recommends approval of the project in accordance with the attached City Council Resolution. FISCAL IMPACT: The applicant has paid for all costs associated with the processing of these applications. Attachments 1. City Council Resolution and Ordinance (see Section 2 in the book) 2. Exhibits 3. Planning Commission Minutes and Resolution 4. Addendum to FEIR-89-1O 5. Public Input 6. Disclosure Statement (m:\home\plaoning\PCS-9609.A13) 1/- ~ ".' ORDINANCE NO. o(¿.y~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE RANCHO DEL REY SPA III PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, AND LAND USE DISTRICT MAPS 1. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the properties which are the subject matter of this ordinance are diagrammatically represented on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, and located within the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Planned Community Area of the City of Chula Vista ("Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on March 8, 1996, the Rancho Del Rey Partnership L.P. ("Developer") filed an application requesting amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Planned Community District Regulations (known as Document No. _ on file with the office of the City Clerk) Land Use District Map and Land Use District designations of certain areas within the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Planned Community ("Project"). C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the Project Site has been in part the subject matter of a Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15993 ("Rancho Del Rey SPA III ") and Planned Community (P.C.) District Regulations previously approved by City Council Ordinance No. 2440 (Rancho" Del Rey SPA III Planned Community District Regulations) on March 8, 1996. D. Planning Commission Record on Applications WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said project on June 26, 1996, and voted to recommend that the City Council approve the Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map amendments in accordance with the findings in the City Council Resolution. The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on this Project held on June 26, 1996, and the minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. 1 11-4,,/ ~, E. City Council Record on Applications WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on July 16, 1996, on the Discretionary Approval Application, and to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and, F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution and Ordinance WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting at which this ordinance was introduced for first reading on July 16, 1996, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approved Resolution No. 18366 by which it imposed amendments on the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, Rancho Del Rey SPA III General Development Plan, Rancho Del Rey SPA III Residential Design Guidelines, Rancho Del Rey SPA III Water Conservation Plan and Rancho Del Rey SPA III Air Quality Improvement Plan. II. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: A. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new supplemental EIR is necessary and has prepared an addendum to EIR-89-1O, Rancho Del Rey SPA III, which must be considered and recertified by the City Council prior to a decision on the project. B. INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL The City Council does hereby find that in the exercise of their independent review and judgement, the addendum to EIR 89-10 in the form presented has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the state EIR guidelines and the Environmental Review procedures of the City of Chula Vista and hereby adopt same. C. FINDINGS FOR P-C PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE AMENDMENTS The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendment to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Planned Community District Regulations Land Use Districts Plan are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and public necessity, convenience, the general welfare, and good zoning practice support the amendments. 2 //19':2- -, D. APPROVAL The City Council does hereby approve the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Planned Community District Regulation amendments, as represented in Exhibit _ on file with the City Clerk as Document No._, and the Land Use District Maps as shown on Exhibit D, on file with the City Clerk as Document No. III. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by Robert A. Leiter G~~~ Ann Y. Moore, Interim City Attorney Director of Planning N:\shared\attomey\PCM-9605.cco 3 J/t9'J RESOLUTION NO. /8'"J¡'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE RANCHO DEL REY SPA III SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES, WATER CONSERVATION PLAN AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN (PCM -96-05); AND APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS ON TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CHULA VISTA TRACT 96-05 (PCS-96-05), AND ADOPT ADDENDUM TO FEIR-89-1O 1. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and commonly known as Rancho Del Rey SPA III Parcel R-7, Tentative Subdivision Map Chula Vista Tract 96-05; and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 156 acres located on the south side of East "H" Street between Paseo Ranchero and Del Rey Boulevard, within the Rancho Del Rey Planned Community ("Project Site"); and, B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on March 8, 1996 Rancho Del Rey Investors, L.P. ("Owner") filed applications with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista requesting approval of amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, General Development, Plan and Planned Community District Regulations, Rancho Del Rey SPA III Water Conservation Plan, Rancho Del Rey Air Quality Improvement Plan and Rancho Del Rey SPA III Residential Design Guidelines. The applications also request approval of a tentative subdivision map in order to subdivide Parcel R -7 into 403 residential lots and eleven open space lots (Lots A,B,C,D,E and F of Unit I, Lots A,B and C of Unit 2, and Lots A and B of Unit 3) ("Project"). Parcel R-7 will be divided into three subdivision units, identified here as "Units I, 2, and 3"; and C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of 1) a Specific Plan, EI Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. _ approved on November 12, 1985 2) the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area Plan, previously adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15993 ("SPA"); and 3) a Master Tentative Subdivision Map, previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 16222 ("TSM"), Chula Vista Tract 90-02; 4) an Air Quality 1 //ß-/ Council Resolution No. 16222 ("TSM"), Chula Vista Tract 90-02; 4) an Air Quality Improvement Plan, Rancho Del Rey SPA III Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP); and 5) a Water Conservation Plan, Rancho Del Rey Water Conservation Plan (WCP); both previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 16220 and 16219, respectively on July 9, 1991. D. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on June 26, 1996, and voted (7-0) to recommend that the City Council approve the Project, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions listed below; and, E. City Council Record of Applications WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on July 16, 1996, on the Project and to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on the Project held on June 26, 1996 and the minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. ill. PREVIOUS EIR-89-10 AND ADDENDUM EIR-89-10 REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED;~~GS;APPROVALS The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has previously reviewed, analyzed, considered, approved and certified EIR-89-1O and has considered Addendum FEIR-89- 10; and, IV. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council does hereby find that FEIR -89-10 and the addendum has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines, and Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and hereby adopts the addendum to FEIR-89-1O. V. INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL 2 )/8-.,2 The City Council finds that the FEIR-89-1O and addendum reflects the independent judgement of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista. VI. SPA FlNDINGSI APPROVAL A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AS AMENDED IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE RANCHO DEL REY SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN. The amended Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan is consistent with the Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan and the Chula Vista General Plan. B. THE RANCHO DEL REY SPA III SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA. The SPA Plan as amended is consistent with the amended phasing of internal and external infrastructure and consistent with the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Public Facilities Financing Plan, Air Quality Improvement Plan, and Water Conservation Plan and will, therefore, promote the orderly sequentialized development of the involved Sectional Planning Area. C. THE RANCHO DEL REY SPA III SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AS AMENDED WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USES, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULA TlON, OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The land uses within the Rancho Del Rey SPA III area represent the same uses approved by the Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan and will not adversely affect adjacent land use, residential enjoyment, circulation, or environmental quality. The implementation of this plan will allow for the completion of trail linkages to existing neighborhoods in the area D. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND RESEARCH USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION, AND OVER-ALL DESIGN FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED; THAT THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE SUCH AS TO CREATE A RESEARCH OR INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY AND STABILITY; AND, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE. The amendments do not involve areas planned for industrial and research uses. 3 /18-J E. IN THE CASE OF INSTITUTIONAL, RECREATIONAL, AND OTHER SIMILAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION AND OVER-ALL PLANNING TO THE PURPOSE PROPOSED, AND THAT SURROUNDING AREAS ARE PROTECTED FROM ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM SUCH DEVELOPMENT. The project includes the construction of the hiking trails within the project boundary which are a component of the overall Rancho Del Rey Planned Community recreational trails system. F. THE STREET AND THOROUGHFARES PROPOSED ARE SUITABLE AND ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC THEREON. The amendments do not involve changes to the existing circulation system, except for internal streets and access points along Paseo Ranchero and East "H" Street. A traffic analysis for the project concludes that although a net increase of approximately 2,000 trips (ADT) is expected on East "H" Street as a result of the proposed change in land use, there will be no changes in either the AM or PM levels of service (LOS) at the near by intersections. G. ANY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE JUSTIFIED ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION(S) PROPOSED AND WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL FACILITIES OF THE TYPES NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCATION(S). The amendments do not involve areas planned for commercial uses. H. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT CAN BE PLANNED AND ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID DEVELOPMENT. The amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and regulations applicable to surrounding areas and therefore, said development can be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with said development. I. ADOPTION OF SPA In light of the findings above, the amended Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan is hereby approved and adopted in the form presented and attached subject to the general and specific conditions set forth hereinbelow. 4 //ß-f --"---- VII. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS/ APPROVAL A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein for Rancho Del Rey SPA III Parcel R-7, Chula Vista Tract No. 96-05 is in conformance with the Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan and the elements of the City of Chula Vista General Plan, based on the following: a. Land Use The Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, as amended, designates parcel (R-7) as Residential Single Family Cottages (4-6 & 6-8 du/ac) and SFA Residential Duplex Townhomes (8-12 du/ac). The target density for the 156 acre parcel is 6.2 du/ac with a maximum of 520 dwelling units. The project, as conditioned, is in compliance with the City's General Plan, Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan and SPA. b. Circulation All of the on-site and off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision will be constructed or DIF fees paid by ,the developer in accordance with the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Public Facilities Financing Plan and Development Agreement. The public streets within the Project will be designed in accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements and provide for vehicular and pedestrian connections for the entire SPA c. Housing Resolution No. 15751 adopted by the City Council on August 7, 1990, acknowledged that the requirement to provide ten percent of the total number of units allowed in the Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan for low and moderate income households. The resolution also acknowledge that the 5 % moderate income housing and most of the low income housing have been provided in SPA I and II. The remaining requirement is to provide approximately 23 units for low income households in SPA III. The City Council designated the northerly 2.2 acres of Parcel R -6 as the low income housing site in the Rancho Del Rey SPA III where 40 low income townhomes will be constructed in the near future. d. Conservation The Environmental Impact Report EIR -89-10 and Addendum FEIR 89-10 5 IIßf -- ^-- ~------~ ___.._.___~__"_ _ ______.._..___.u____.._____ ~__~~.~________ addressed the goals and policies of the Conservation Element of the General Plan and found the development of this site to be consistent with these goals and policies. e. Parks and Recreation, Open Space The Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan provides public parks, trails and open space consistent with City policies. f. Seismic Safety The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and policies of the Seismic Element of the General Plan for this site. g. Safety The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have reviewed the proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety policies and have determined that the proposal meets the City Threshold Standards for emergency services. h. Noise Noise mitigation measures included in the Environmental Impact Report EIR-89-1O and Addendum FEIR-89-1O adequately address the noise policy of the General Plan. The project has been conditioned to require that all dwelling units be designed to preclude interior noise levels over 45 dBA. and exterior noise exposure to 65 dBA which in accordance with the City's performance standards. 1. Scenic Highway The project site is located adjacent to a designated scenic highway and an average 80 ft. wide landscaped open space buffer and a decorative perimeter wall will be provided along East "H" Street and extended along Paseo Ranchero. j. Bicycle Routes Bicycle lanes have been incorporated within the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Planned Community and are presently in use. The public streets within the project are of adequate width to accommodate bicycle travel within the interior of the subdivision. 6 Ilg...¿ k. Public Buildings No public buildings are proposed on the project site. The project is subject to RCT fees prior to issuance of building permits. B. Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. C. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site partially allows for the optimum sitting of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities as required by Government Code Section 66473.1. D. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects. E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in light of the findings above, the City Council does hereby approve the Tentative Subdivision Map subject to the general and specific conditions set forth below. Vill. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the foregoing SPA Amendments and Tentative Subdivision Map which are conditioned on "General Conditions", is hereby conditioned as follows: A. Project Site is Improved with Project Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in the Master Tentative Subdivision Map Chula Vista Tract 96-06 and EIR- 89-10 and Addendum FEIR-89-10 except as modified by this Resolution. B. Implement Mitigation Measures Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report EIR-89-10 and Addendum FEIR-89-10. C. Implement previously adopted conditions of approval pertinent to project 7 //ß" ? I ';{) Unless otherwise conditioned, developer shall comply with all unfulfilled conditions of approval of the Rancho Del Rey SPA In Master Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 90- 02, established by Resolution No. 16222 approved by Council on June 18, 1991, and shall remain in compliance with and implement the terms, conditions, and provisions of Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, General Development Plan, Planned Community District Regulations, Rancho Del Rey SPA III Water Conservation Plan, Rancho Del Rey SPA In Air Quality Improvement Plan, Rancho Del Rey SPA III Residential Design Guidelines and Rancho Del Rey SPA III Public Facilities Financing Plan as amended and as are applicable to the property which is the subject matter of this SPA amendment and tentative map, prior to approval of the Final Map or shall have entered into an agreement with the City, providing the City with such security (including recordation of covenants running with the land) and implementation procedures, as the City may require, assuring that after approval of the Final Map, the developer shall continue to comply with, remain in compliance with, and implement such plans. D. Implement Public Facilities Financing Plan Developer shall install public facilities in accordance with the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Public Facilities Financing Plan, as amended or as required by the City Engineer, to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The City Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. E. Contingency of Project Approval Approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map is contingent upon the amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, General Development Plan, Planned Community District Regulations and Rancho Del Rey SPA III Residential Design Guidelines taking effect (PCM-96-09). F. Design Approval The applicant shall develop the lots in accordance with the applicable Rancho Del Rey SPA III Development Regulations and Design Guidelines. The plans for the residential units for Units 1, 2 and 3 shall be submitted for review and obtain approval under the City's design review process prior to submittal for building permits. IX. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. Sectional Planning Area(SPA) Plan As a condition to the approval of the SPA Plan amendments the applicant shall: 1. Provide a landscape buffer with an average width of 80 ft. and minimum 8 I/ß-t?' .-....--....- .._-_..~..._". dimension of 40 ft. along East "R" Street. This buffer area shall contain a 10 ft. wide recreation trail from the sewer access road to Paseo Del Rey and an eight ft. wide trail from the sewer access road to Del Rey Boulevard. Extend the proposed retaining wall and handrail, as determined by the City Engineer, to provide a minimum of eight feet (8') clear sidewalk width. The landscape buffer design is subject to approval by the director of Parks and Recreation and Planning Departments. 2. Include post and fence railing per CVDS standards, where necessary, along the recreational trail from Paseo Del Rey to Del Rey Boulevard. 3. Prepare, submit and obtain approval by the Director of Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments of all hiking and pedestrian trails design associated with this project. 4. Provide a minimum separation of ten feet from the street right of way to the recreational trails located along East "R" Street, except where physical constraints or ADA do not allow it. 5. Amend the Rancho Del Rey Planned Community District Regulations to include the following property development standards for Units 1, 2 and 3: UNIT I UNIT 2 UNIT 3 · Min lot Area (sq. ft.) 3,850 3,960 2,720 · Min lot Width (lin. ft) Regular shape lot 55 44 32 Panhandle shape lot 25 25 n/a · Minimum lot Depth 70 90 85 · Max lot Coverage (%) 50 50 50 · HOOT Area Ratio .60 .60 .70·"· · Front Yard Setback (lin. ft.) (from public right of way) To garage 15 15 15 To Main Res 15 15 15 · Side Yard Setback (lin. ft.) To adj. res. lot 10/3 10/3 10/0*** Min. dist btwn units 10 10 20*** To adj. St. (cor. lot) 10 10 10 · Rear Yard Setback 15 15 15# · Max. Building Height 28 28 28 · Parking Spaces/ Unit 2 car/gar 2 car/gar 2car/gar · Usable open space/lot (sq.ft.) 750' 750' 750' · private open Space/ unit (percentage of lot area) 15%** 15%** 15%** · Guest Parking- on street l/lot 1/l0t l/lot · Usable open space for each typical three or four bedroom dwelling, either excJusive in private ards, or in combination of private yards, landscaped front yards and/or common areas. 9 //8~1 - - _._,,-~-~_.. .. Private usable fenced yard area shan be no less than 15 percent of the lot size with no dimension less than 10 feet. ... May be modified with site plan approval provided the dimension is not less than seven feet. 5' side yards may be allowed for no more than 10% of the total number of dwelling units. ..** May be increased with site plan (Design Review) approval. # Rear yard setback may be reduced to ten feet (10') with site plan approval provided fifteen percent (15%) of the lot area is still provided as private open space. 6. Amend Section VI.8 of the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan to include specific architectural design criteria for all building elevations exposed to East "H" Street, Paseo Ranchero and any other public street prior to approval of the first final map. 7. Prepare and submit 15 bound copies of the final revised SPA prior to approval of the first final map. 8. Design all Dwelling units to preclude interior noise levels over 45 dBA and all exterior private open space shield with solid masonry walls and or buildings to limit noise exposure to 65 dBA. 9. Provide a comprehensive fencing program incorporating the following fencing standards: a. Where privacy fences are installed directly over, or immediately adjacent to retaining walls, the overall wall! fence height shall not exceed 7 ft. Where higher retaining walV fence conditions occurs, a four foot landscape transition strip between the wall and the fence shall be provided. b. Fences, retaining walls or a combination of both located within the required front setback area shall be limited to forty two inches in height (42"). c. Provide a design and install 5 ft. high decorative fences on along the exterior side yard of all corner lots. B. Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions Prior to approval of the final map unless otherwise indicated, the developer shall: GENERAL/PRELIMINARY 10 I/ß-It? I. Comply with all unfulfilled conditions of approval applicable to Phase 1 of the Rancho del Rey SPA III, Chula Vista Tract 90-02, Tentative Map established by Resolution No. 16222 approved by Council on July 30, 1991 II. Install public facilities in accordance with the Rancho del Rey SPA's I, II, & III Public Facilities Financing Plan as amended or as required by the City Engineer to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The City Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. III. If phasing is proposed within an individual map or through multiple final maps, Developer shall submit and obtain approval for a development phasing plan by the City Engineer and Director of Planning prior to approval of each final map. Improvements, facilities and dedications to be provided with each phase or unit of development shall be as detennined by the City Engineer and Director of Planning. The developer shall provide said improvement facilities and/or dedications as detennined to be necessary by the City to provide adequate circulation and to meet the requirements of police and fire departments. The City Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. STREETS. RIGHTS-OF- WAY AND IMPROVEMENTS 1. Design and construct all street improvements in accordance with Chula Vista Design Standards, Chula Vista Street standards, and the Chula Vista Subdivision Manual unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Submit for approval by the City Engineer improvement plans detailing horizontal and vertical alignment of said streets. Said improvements shall include, but not be limited to, asphalt concrete pavement, base, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, sewer and water utilities, drainage facilities, street lights, signs, and fire hydrants. 2. Construct or agree to construct prior to approval of the final map for each unit the construction of public street improvements deemed necessary to provide service to the subject subdivision in accordance with City standards. 3. Submit and obtain preliminary approval for proposed street names from the Director of Planning and City Engineer. Final approval of street names shall be by the Planning Commission. Dedicate to public use right of way for all streets shown on the Tentative map within the subdivision. 4. Street light locations shall be approved by the City Engineer. 11 1/0-// 5. Construct proposed lO-foot wide sidewalk along East "H" Street to meet American with Disabilities Act standards. 6. Modify existing traffic signal and median island at East "H" Street and Tierra del Rey to accommodate movements for the southerly extension of Tierra del Rey. Submit and obtain approval of the City Engineer for signal and median island modification and striping plans. 7. Construct a bus turnout at the southeasterly corner of East "H" Street and Tierra del Rey. Construct said bus turnout to meet City standards. 8. Present written verification to the City Engineer from Otay Water District that the subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long term water storage facilities. 9. Provide temporary turnarounds for emergency vehicle access at all unit and/or phase boundaries to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Fire Marshal. 10. Remove portions within street rights of way and future residential lots of existing storms drains to be abandoned. Method of abandonment for portion of storm drain to be abandoned shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 11. Provide paved access (minimum 12' width) to all public sewer manholes necessary to serve the subdivision. Design access road to accommodate H-20 wheel loads and maximum 15% grade to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 12. Provide access from East "H" Street to the existing IS-foot wide SDG&E access road satisfactory to the City Engineer and SDG&E. Design the 10- foot sidewalk crossing at said access road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13. Design all center line horizontal curves for Camino del Sol with minimum radii length of 200 feet. GRADING 14. Submit an hydrologic and hydraulic studies and calculations, including dry lane calculations for all public streets. 15. Provide improved access to all storm drain clean outs or as approved by the City Engineer. 12 II[J~/~ __~m._.....__.._ ~m_..__,,_.. 16. Submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer for an erosion and sedimentation control plan as part of grading plans. 17. Obtain and submit a letter of permission to grade within or adjacent to the 250-foot wide SDG&E easement prior to start of grading. 18. Extend the existing storm drain from the Otay Water District reservoir across the IS-foot wide SDG&E access road. 19. Show the location of existing cut/fill lines on grading plans unless othelWise approved by the City Engineer. 20. Provide a minimum 10' wide area with a maximum slope of 2% between the back of sidewalk and a wall or fence at the cul-de-sacs of Streets Plaza La Paz, Camino del Sol, Plaza Amistad, and along Camino del Rey. 21. AU grading and pad elevations shall be within 2 feet of the grades and elevations shown on the approved tentative map or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director. 22. Submit a preliminary list of proposed lots indicating whether the structure will be located on fill, cut, or a transition between the two situations prior to approval of grading plans and a final list with the final soils report. 23. Design grading to bring lots 106/107, 115, 116/ 117, 118/119, 111/110, 109, 34/35 of Unit 3 and lot 50 of Unit 1 into compliance with the retaining wall design criteria in SPA condition 9a through 9d. AGREEMENTS 24. Agree that the City may withhold building permits for the subject subdivision if anyone of the following occur: a. Regional development threshold limits set by the East Chula Vista Transportation Phasing Plan have been reached. b. Traffic volumes, levels of service, public utilities and/or services exceed the adopted City threshold standards in the then effective Growth Management Ordinance. c. The required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or as amended or otherwise conditioned have not been completed or constructed to 13 1/[5 -/3 \ satisfaction of the City. The developer may propose changes in the timing and sequencing of development and the construction of improvements affected. In such case, the PFFP may be amended as approved by the City Planning Director and Public Works Director. 25. Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Councilor any approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision pursuant to Section 66499.37 of the State Map Act provided the City promptly notifies the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the defense. 26. Agree to hold the City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation or increase flow of drainage resulting from this project. 27. Agree to ensure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Company") are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television service to each lot within the subdivision. When directed by the City, restrict access to the conduit to only those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been, or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista. 28. Agree to provide, prior to issuance of any building permits a noise study addressing noise impacts generated by major streets surrounding the project (East "H" Street/Paseo Ranchero). Developer shall take the necessary measures to preclude interior noise levels over 45 dBA and shield all exterior private open space with solid masonry walls and or buildings to limit noise exposure to 65 dBA. 29. Agree to provide the initial cycle of fire management! brush clearance in areas of the subject site adjacent to natural open space to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal and the Director of Parks and Recreation Department prior to issuance of building permits. 30. Agree to install fire hydrants at every 500 ft and make them operable prior to delivery of combustible building materials. Exact location of fire hydrants shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall prior to installation. 14 JIß'I{ I J +.... _~...__.++____.____ __ _ ___._______+m_____m._'.___......._..__.....__ OPEN SPACE/ASSESSMENTS 31. Offer to grant in fee on each Final Map all open Space Lots within the subdivision. Prepare and record a grant deed for each open space lot. The minimum width of each open space shall maintain a lO-foot wide landscaping area behind the back of sidewalk. 32. Submit a list of all facilities located on open space lots to be maintained by the existing open space landscape maintenance district. This list shall include a description, quantity and unit price per year for the perpetual maintenance of all facilities located on open space lots to include but not be limited to: walls, fences, water fountains, lighting structures, paths, access roads, drainage structures and landscaping. Only those items on an open space lot are eligible for open space maintenance. Each open space lot shall also be broken down by the number of acres of turf, irrigated, and non-irrigated open space to aid the estimation of a maintenance budget thereof. 33. Deposit funds with the City to process a change and modification to the Engineer's Report for Reassessment District of 1995 for Council approval. Obtain Council approval. Submit for Council approval said change and modification prior to first final map approval. Alternately, make payment to reduce the debt on the subject property as a result of lower density than assumed for the assessment district at the time of district. 34. Pay all costs associated with apportionment of assessments for all City assessment districts as a result of subdivision of lands within the boundary. Complete and submit application for apportionment and provide a deposit to the City estimated at $25 per unit to cover costs. 35. Prepare a disclosure form to be signed be the home buyer acknowledging that additional fees have been paid into the Assessment District, and that these additional fees are reflected in the purchase price of the home for those units which have a density change from that indicated in the assessment district's Engineer's Report. Submit disclosure forms for the approval of the City Engineer. 36. Prepare, submit and obtain design approval by the Director of Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments of a detailed design and development plan of all hiking and pedestrian trail connections associated with this project. 37. Provide a minimum separation of ten feet from the face of the curb to the sidewalk! recreational trail located along East "H" Street except where physical constraints as determined by the City Engineer and ADA requirements do not allow. 15 1/13-;-.5 38. Submit and obtain approval of the usable open space facility located within the SDG&E easement by the Directors of Parks and Recreation and Planning Departments. Applicant shall design the usable open space areas to qualify for maintenance through open space maintenance district as follows: Usable open space shall include the following components: a. Turf! landscaping b. sidewalks/ trails c. Benches and tables The Following shall be excluded from usable open space areas: a. Picnic shelters b. Hard surface areas such as basket ball courts c. any other structure prohibited by SDG&E 39. Obtain authorization from SDG&E and develop the usable open space, as described above, within the power line easement. 40. Incorporate the usable open space located within the SDG&E easement into the project's open space maintenance district. 41. Include the location and treatment of all roads and recreational trails within the SDG&E easement and Otay Water District property in the final landscape and irrigation plans for the open space. 42. Install a minimum forty two inch (42") high decorative wall or railing along with landscaping where cul-de-sacs abut open space per Rancho Del Rey SPA III Fencing Design Guidelines. 43. Provide a minimum of ten feet wide landscaping strip along the eastern edge of the project abutting Paseo Ranchero and a minimum of ten feet wide landscaping strip between curb and perimeter walls or edges abutting rights of way. 44. Submit detailed irrigation plans and water management guidelines for all open space landscaping in accordance with the Chula Vista Landscape Manual. The plans are subject to approval by the Director of Planning and the Director of Parks and Recreation Department. 45. Modify the Rancho Del Rey SPA III master landscape plan and water 16 1/8-1i, _...._,_..~-- management guidelines to include the open space of the Project. Modifications shall be accordance with the Chula Vista Landscape Design Manual and submitted to the Parks and Recreation and Planning Departments for review and approval. 46. Provide a landscape buffer with an average width of 80 ft. and minimum dimension of 40 ft. along East "H" Street west of the SDG&E power line easement. This buffer area shall contain a 10 ft. wide recreation trail from the sewer access road to Paseo Del Rey and an eight ft. wide from the sewer access road to Del Rey Boulevard. Where necessary, include post and fence railing per CVDS standards except as modified by the Director of Parks and Recreation or Planning. EASEMENTS 47. Grant to the City a 10' wide easement for general utility purposes along East uH" Street frontage of the open space lots to be granted in fee to the City. 48. Grant on the associated final map a minimum 15' wide easement to the City of Chula Vista for construction and maintenance of storm drain facilities within Lots 10, 23,75 and 88 of Unit 1, Lots 54 and 86 of Unit 2. 49. Grant to the City a 5.5 foot wide street tree planting and maintenance easement along all public streets within the subdivision. MISCELLANEOUS 50. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System -Zone VI (NAD '83). 51. Submit copies of each final map and improvement plan in a digital format such as (DXF) graphic file prior to approval of each Final Map. Provide computer aided Design (CAD) copy of the Pinal Map based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and submit the information in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal in duplicate on 5-1/4 HD floppy disk prior to the approval of each Final Map. 52. Comply, implement and remain in compliance with the mitigation measures required by the Environmental Impact Report FEIR-89-1O and addendum which are hereby incorporated into this resolution by reference. Any measure not satisfied by specific condition of this resolution or by the project design should be implemented to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning. 17 //ß-/7 Mitigation Measures shall be monitored via Mitigation Measures Monitoring Program approved in conjunction with FEIR-89-10. Modification of the sequence of mitigation shall be at the discretion of the Director of Planning should changes in circumstances warrant such revision. 53. Redesign lot lines to bring following lots into compliance with the above mentioned property development standards (SPA condition No.5) and insure that the minimum lot width dimensions, as measured from the front setback line is maintained on all Cul-de-sacs and knuckle lots. (UNIT 1) WIDTH of regular lots 38 and 41 and knuckle lots 47-51,51-60, 108-110, 120, 125-127 inclusive. DEPTH of lot 118. (UNIT 2) WIDTH of regular lots 46-48, 82-84,100,132 knuckle lots 7, 9, 19, 21, 92, 93, 94. DEPTH of lots 11-16 and 18. (UNIT 3) WIDTH of regular lots 26,90 and 105 knuckle lots 7-10, 28, 29, 36-39, 59-61. DEPTH of lots 30, 40, 41, 84, 98, 115, 116 and 120. 54. Design all public sidewalks to comply and remain in compliance with the American Disability Act. 55. Provide a bond to be approved by the City, guaranteeing the construction of the community trails prior to approval of the first final map. 56. Prepare and submit to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning 15 bound copies of the final revised SPA prior to approval of the first final map. 57. Amend Section VI.8 of the Rancho Del Ray SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan to incorporate specific architectural design criteria for all building elevations exposed to East "H" Street, Paseo Ranchero, internal Streets and open space. 58. Provide a tabulation of the square footage, lot widths and lot depths of all 18 lIB-If" lots prior to approval with each final map. X CODE REQUIREMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 59. Comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual. 60. Developer shall apply for and receive, a take permit from the appropriate resource agencies or comply with an approved MCSP or other equivalent lO(a) permit as may be applicable to the property. 61. Underground all utilities within the subdivision in accordance with Municipal Code requirements. 62. Pay the Spring Valley Trunk Sewer connection fees ($130/acre). 63. Pay the following fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy: a. The Transportation and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. b. Signal Participation Fees. c. All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection fees. d. SR-125 impact fee. Pay the amount of said fees in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. XI. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Resolution. 19 J)!J-I? ".-.. XII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provision, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction top be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. Presented by Approved as to form by Cl~ \.1 'Y\tt~Q - Robert A. Leiter Ann Y. Moore, Interim City Attorney Director of Planning n:\shared\attomey\pcs9606.ccr 20 )/0'20 '~'- ,- .--- "---~._._~_. ! , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS BY THE I CITY COUNCIL OF , CHULA VISTA, CAUFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering a Tentative Subdivision Map for 156 acres located on the south side of East "H" Street between Pasco Ranchero and Del Rey Boulevard within the Rancho Del Rey SPA III planned community. The City Council will also consider amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, General Development Plan, Planned Community District Regulations, Rancho Del Rey SPA III Residential Design Guidelines, Water Conservation and Air Quality Improvement Plans. The applications submitted by the Rancho Del Rey Partnership request the following: 1. Amendments to the Rancho Del Rey SPA III consist of changing the land use designation of parcel R-7 from Specialty Housing (SH) to Single Family Detached Cottages (SFS) and Residential Duplex/l'ownhomes (SFA); reducing the allowable number of units from 588 to 520 and incorporating statistical changes and additional design and development criteria in the above mentioned Rancho Del Rey SPA III documents, 2. The Tentative Subdivision Map application consists of subdividing 156 acres into 403 residential lots (approximately 86 acres) and 11 open space lots (70 acres). improvements. The proposed Rancho Del Rey SPA III amendments and Tentative Subdivision Map applications are on file in the office of the Planning Department. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by the Planning Department no later than noon of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this SPA Plan Amendment and Tentative Subdivision Map in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing, descnbed in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday July 16, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.. in the Council Chambers Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. COMPUANCE WlTII TIlE AMERICANS WlTII DISABtUTIES Th. City of Cbula VI.1a, In o:omplylq wllb !be AlDerIcaD. with Dloabltll1es Ad (ADA, roquest tndbldual. wbo roqulre .pedal a..........odallon. 10 acceo.. attend, and/or parilclpate tn a City me.tI.... aelMty, or ..nI.. roquesl .ueb a<commodatlon al 1...1 forty-ellbl bOlln tn adva.... for meell...s and Doe days for scbeduled .enl... and activities. Please o:onlad Nancy Ripley for speem. Infurmallon al (619) 691-5101 or Telecommunication. Devl... for lbe Deaf (roD) at (619) 585·5647. California Relay Servl.. I. also avallabl. for !be bearl"l Impaired. DATED: July 3, 1996 CASE NO. PCM-96-09 and PCS·96·0S SEE VICINITY MAP ON TIlE REVERSE SIDE OF TIllS NOTICE (M,\HOME'J'IANNING\LUIS\PCM......œN) ~~a/ m~V ~A-&, L,~ _, ~'___M ______..__..___'m__..__.__,_.___~_,__.. .. _."._..__~._.__,_.."___,...~.., _._....___..._._..__ /J~/' - c-l!! o 0 "¿;;= 'S;: 0 .- - \ ,,0 \ ..0- :>M "0 \ -ooq- \ 0_ ~.:! \ ~..Q :'2)( 'J :s~ ~a. ,,:> C" ~- E- 00 -N Z ~~ E" W "c c 0 :E " .. E'ãj E- «~ ~8. I¥ V>- 0 -< O''¡:: ~ c Q. o~ en C·- _ W Z.Q :s~ - ~ 1 Q .. 0 ~~ 0 z - "'t).J: a. o en .- u to') f- ~oc ~ ~>o;;" _ U"U a. Z "CI 0000 0 t; a:I 1ñ00~ "N~ - ~:) :> ~ Z a 0"='" ff en ~.~ 5 Z -< ~ Q. ~ I/) 0 -< .0 0- E- o tI') A: ffi~ - ..J ~ > . - u .. C .. Z -0 ~ -t; .. II ¡¡: -< I!I > .~ .5 ~ GJ to,.... :::J "'III 'I; - ãi II II :c ·õa ~ .. 0 a U ...oc... .S! ~~= 0 =&- ~ =fi..:; 0 :EJ!cn z '" gð glii § ~~ ~; ~8 o I ==:=:J ð ð o z ..;.¡ , ----.--,,- .'".____._ .__m__~_ ) , 6400500800 6400501800 6400501900 ~ EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CHULA VI 945 EAST J 5T 795 EAST J 8T C/O LA PETITE ACADEMY 8717 W 110TH 5T #300 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 OVERLAND PARK KS 66210 6400502000 6400502500 6400503200 "RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONS30\#RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L cIa MCMILLIN PROJECT SERV 2727 HOOVER AVE 91910 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 / 6400503300 6400601800 6400601900 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS CONS30!t#RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L CONS30\#RANCHO DEL REY I TORS L CONS30\#RANCHO DE L Clo TRIDENT RDR L P c/o MCMILLIN P SERV C/O HCM! PROJECT SERV 7001 N SCOTTSDALE RD AVE 272 COVER AVE SCO'ITSDALE AZ 85253 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 :r:i{TIONAL CITY CA 91950 6400803900 6400803900 6401521800 NSNS3/5#BENNETT SUSIE M 945 EAST J 5T 4623 SCHAUMBERG PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 91910 BONITA CA 91902 6401521800 6401521900 6401522000 RESIDENT* ..-....... 755 BAJa CT 759 BAJO CT 763 BAJO CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401522100 6401522200 6401522300 __.__ w...._.. : 767 BAJO CT 771 BAJO CT 776 BAJO CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401522400 6401522500 6401522600 - , w.. . ..~ 772 BAJO CT 768 BAJO CT 7690 GOLFCREST DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 SAN DIEGO CA 92119 6401522600 6401522700 6401522700 w RESIDENT* UWJT~GUILLEN MARIA D _RESIDENT* 76. BAJa CT 4 BLUE ANCHOR CAY 760 BAJa CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CORONADO CA 92118 6401522800 6401522900 -. , 756 BAJO CT 752 PASEO DEL REY 748 PASEO DEL REY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 - -0".-· _ _ _ __ ___________._ __ ____ \ I 640~523100 6401523200 6401523300 - - -- SWJT#PASTEN SORAYA 744 PASEO DEL REY 740 PASED DEL REY 736 PASEO DEL REY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6401523400 6401523500 6401523600 - 732 PASEO DEL REY 41205 WHITTIER AVE 2425 LARKHAVEN LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 HEMET CA 92544 OXNARD CA 9:3030 6401523700 6401523800 6401523900 L -"T' 720 PABEO DEL REY 716 PASEO DEL REY 712 PABEO DEL REY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6401524000 6401524100 6401524200 SMJT#GALVEZ JOEL 708 PASEO DEL HEY 704 PASEO DEL REY 700 PASEO DEL REY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402000100 6402000100 6402000200 , - RESIDENT· MWSOSO\ffCLARK SANDRA M 420 E H ST #1416 902 REDBUD RD 904 REDBUD RD CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402000300 6402000400 6402000400 1 &. RESIDENT· 906 REDBUD RD 251 ARDENNES erR 908 REDBUD RD CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SEASIDE CA 93955 6402000500 6402000600 6402000700 -. . L - ilDJT#BARNET'I' DAGMAR J 910 REDBUD RD 912 REDBUD RD 822 AVENIDA MADERA CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402000700 6402003900 6402004000 RESIDENT* ---- 91. REDBUD RD 925 REDBUD RD 923 REDBUD RD CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHCJ..A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402004100 6402004200 6402004200 RESIDENT* 802 CEDARBEND WAY 80 w . ... ~ ,. 80. CEnARBEND IfY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 - _.~._~--_. - ~.---_._--_._.__._'--_. ( i 6402004300 6402004400 6402004500 --- no CEDARBEND WAY 812 CEDARBEND WAY 816 CEDARBEND NAY . CHULA VISTA CA 9191'1) CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHeLA VISTA CA 91910 6402004600 6402004700 6402004800 - 818 CEDARSEND WAY 820 C'ECARBEND WAY 824 CEDARBEND WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402004900 6402004900 6402005000 RESIDENT· .. --- PMRF BARKING SANDS 82. CEDARBEND WY 828 CE'DARBEND WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 KEKAHA HI 96152 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402005700 6402005700 6402005800 RESIDENT· I 1419 MAX AVE 839 CEDARBEND WY 466 ACERO PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91911 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 640:2005800 6402005900 6402005900 RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 837 CEDARBEND NY 835 CEDARBEND WAY 835 CEDARBEND NY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402006000 6402006000 6402006100 ..- - -. RESIDENT· HM'JTSO'tGUARIN DEMETRIO U&ElLEEN P 889 REDBUD PL 833 CEDARBEND NY 831 CEDARBEND WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402006200 6402006300 6402006400 - 829 CEDARBEND WAY 827 CEDARBEND WAY 825 CEDARBEND WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402006500 6402006600 6402006700 -.. - UWJT#RASO JANET S 823 CEnARBEND WAY 821 CEDAJU3END WAY 819 CEDARBEND WAY œtJLA VISTA CA 91910 c:HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402006800 6402006900 6402007000 - - 8'1'1 CEDARBEND WAY·' " 815 CEDARBEND WAY 1032 DORADO CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 .._.._----_._,--,----~.._---~-_.__. i 6402007000 6402007100 6402007200 RESIDENT- - ..............LIV"IJ:I '13 CEDARBEND WY B 11 CEDARBEND WAY B09 CEDARBEND WAY CHtJlA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402007300 6402007300 6402007400 - . RESIDENT- t AMERICAN EMBASSY SANTIAGO .07 CEJ?ARBEND WY 80S CEDARBEND WAY UNIT 4119 ætJLA VISTA CA 91910 APO AA 34033 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402007500 6402007600 6402007600 .--- - RESIDENT- 803 CEDARBEND WAY 740 CARDONA AVE .01 CEDARBEND WY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402007700 6402210100 6402210200 CITY OF CHULA VISTA -- r - C/O CITY MANAGER 898 REDBUD PL 894 REDBUD PL 276 FOURTH A 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402210300 6402210400 6402210400 RESIDENT* S 90 REDBUD PL 3160 CASA BLANCA CT ... REDBUD PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 6402210500 6402210600 6402210700 - - -.- - .II[ 8 B5 REDBUD PL 889 REDBUD PL 586 PARKSIDE DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402210700 6402210800 6402210900 RESIDENT· --.--- - " .93 REDBUD PL 801 EAST J ST 803 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402211000 6402211100 6402211200 - ....-- ...- _. __... A_ , 807 EAST J ST 811 EAST J ST 813 EAST J ST CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402211300 6402211400 6402211500 "- - - 951 CHESTNUT C'I' 953 0IESTNtJ'l" CT C/O ARMANDO MARTINEZ 365 CHURCH AVE CHULA VISTA CA 91910 æuLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 -- --.- --_._---~_.- I ~- 6402211500 6402211600 6402211700 RESIDENT· 955 CHESTNUT CT 957 CHESTNUT CT 959 ClŒSTNtTI' cr CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CIItJLA VISTA CA 91910 CIItJLA VISTA CA 91910 6402211800 6402211900 6402212000 - 961 CHESTNUT CT 963 CHESTNUT CT .816 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 OIULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6402212100 6402212200 6402212300 812 EAST J ST 810 EAST J ST 806 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 OIULA VISTA CA 91910 OIULA VISTA CA 91910 6402212400 6402212500 6402220100 - 802 EAST J ST 800 EAST J ST 965 CHESTNtTI' CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402220200 6402220300 6402220400 - '''1 967 CHESTNUT CT 969 CHESTNUT CT 971 CHESTNUT CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402220500 6402220600 6402220700 .. 980 CHESTNUT CT 2175 TECALOTE DR 975 CHESTNtJT CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 FALLBROOK CA 92028 6402220700 6402:220800 6402220900 RESIDENT· T 97. CHESTNUT CT 974 CHESTNtTI' CT 972 CHESTNUT CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402221000 6402221100 6402221200 --. - - .4 970 CHESTNUT CT 968 CHESTNUT CT 966 CHESTNUT CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402221300 6402221400 6402221500 958 CHESTNUT cr 950 CHESnwr CT 827 E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 ( , 6402221600 6402221700 6402221800 --. .-- .. - SMJT'EISENBART ROBERT S 831 EAST J ST 833 EAST J ST 837 BAST J ST 0lULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402221900 6402222000 6402222100 -- SWJTf#GONZALEZ ELVIRA R C 841 EAST J ST 843 EAST J ST 847 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402222200 6402222200 6402222300 --- - 11 3518 NORIEGA ST 851 E J ST 855 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94122 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402222400 6402222500 6402222600 - - 85,9 EAST J ST 852 E J ST 850 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402222700 6402222800 6402222900 ~ , - .& - 846 E J ST 842 E J ST 840 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402223000 6402223100 6402223200 - .. u".1.Ji.a 836 EAST J ST 832 E J ST 830 E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402223300 6402223400 6402223400 --- ...- -,' th. .SIDENT* 826 EAST J ST 822 E J ST 822 E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHUI..A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402223500 6402310100 6402310200 ~. .._n. . . - 820 EAST J ST 1020 RED OAK PL 1016 RED OAK PL CHUI..A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402310300 6402310400 6.402310500 - - .. 1012 RED OAK PL 1008 RED OAK PL 1004 RED OAK PL 0ftJI..A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 C 6402310600 6402310700 6402310800 - UMNS#SANDOVAL GUILLERMO F 1000 RED OAK PL 1001 Rtc OAK PL 1005 RED OAK PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 ætJLA VISTA CA 91910 6402310900 6402310900 6402311000 - - RESIDENT'" 1454 WOODGLEN TER 1009 RED OAK PL 1013 RED OAK PL CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6402311100 6402311200 6402311200 - . RESIDENT* 1017 RED OAK PL 1121 CORRALES LN 1021 RED OAK PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402311300 6402311400 6402311500 - - - 963 E J ST 967 EAST J ST 971 EAST J ST CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 OIULA VISTA CA 91910 6402311600 6402311700 6402311800 --.... -- - -- . j H T 975 EAST J ST 950 EAST J ST 954 EAST J ST CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402311900 6402312000 6402312000 ~ - " RESIDENT'" 958 EAST J ST POBOX 434394 962 E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 SAN YSIDRO CA 92143 6402312100 6402312200 6402312300 - --- -,."nvc: n 966 EAST J ST 970 EAST J ST 9n WILD OAK RD CHt1LA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 6402312400 6402312500 . 6402312600 , - -'~.<A" - 959 WILD OAK RD 957 WILD OAK RD 955 WILD OAK RD CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402312700 6402312800 6402312900 I - -..--. 953 WILD OAK RD 952 WILD OAK RD CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 . ---,..- --- ----------~...~._._~-_..- .--.--..- I, 6402313000 6402313100 6402313200 ,,- 958 WILD OAK RD 960 WILD OAK RD 51 BLACKWOOD RD OIULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91.910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402313300 6402313400 6402313500 - 947 BLACKWOOD RD 943 BLACKWOOD RD 941 BLACKWOOD RD CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402313600 6402340100 6402340200 931 BLACKWOOD RD 872EJST 876 E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402340200 6402340300 6402340400 RESIDENT* 876 E E ST 469 SMOKY erR 1024 RIVER ASH DR CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402340500 6402340500 6402340600 1 RESIDENT* __u 744 TWIN CAKS AVE 1030 RIVER ASH DR 873 GOLD OAK CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402340700 6402340800 6402345300 871 GOLD OAK cr 867 GOLD OAK CT 1019 RIVER ASH DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402345400 6402345500 6402345600 I - 1023 RIVER ASH DR 1027 RIVER ASH DR 4634 PASEO DE LA VISTA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 6402345600 6402345700 6402345700 RESIDENT· - 6SIDENT* 1031 RIVER ASH DR 1584 CHAPARRAL DR 1035 RIVER ASH DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 6402400100 6402400400 6402400400 -- .. HWJ'I'#LIZAN FILEMON N&:MERCEDITAS M RESIDENT· 981 E J ST 1055 CORDOVA DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 91910 _......_.."_ ____.~._._ ___._._....___·__._H_.. ( I 6402400500 6402400600 6402400700 - .. _n 1049 CORDOVA DR 1043 CORDOVA DR 1012 CORDOVA CT CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402400800 6402400900 6402400900 - SWJT#BRAMBILA MlDALIA R IESIDENT* 1008 CORDOVA CT POBOX 2774 1004 CORDOVA CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 PAGOSA SPRINGS CO 81147 6402401000 6402401100 6402401200 '_'n - - . 1000 CORDOVA cr lOOl CORDOVA cr 1005 CORDOVA CT œtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402401300 6402401400 6402401500 1009 CORDOVA CT 1037 CORDOVA DR 1031 CORDOVA DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402401600 6402401700 6402401800 1025 CORDOVA DR 101.9 CORDOVA DR 1013 CORDOVA DR æuLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402401900 6402402000 6402402100 ., .. - 1007 CORDOVA DR 1001 CORDOVA DR 1000 CORDOVA DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402402200 6402402300 6402402400 - - -' ..-- 1006 CORDOVA DR 1012 CORDOVA DR 1018 CORDOVA DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402402500 6402402600 6402402700 - . M ' ~ - 1024 CORDOVA DR 1030 CORDOVA DR 1036 CORDOVA DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402402800 6402402900 6402402900 - - - nn __ RESIDENT* 1042 CORDOVA DR 1584 CHAPARRAL DR 1048 CORDOVA DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 "--....-.---. "---_.._-~_._.. ----_.--~"-_._._- 6402403000 6402403100 6402403200 - - .-... . - 1054 CORDOVA DR 1001 EAST J ST 1005 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402403300 6402403400 6402403500 . ·S-· - -. '. .L. - -..--..- E 1009 E J T 1013 EAST J ST ;rul? EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ætJLA VISTA CA 91910 6402403600 6402403700 6402403800 _ _ n _ .._, 1021 DORADO C'T 1027 DORADO C'T 1033 DORADO CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402403900 6402404000 6402404100 _ ... G 1039 DORADO CT 1045 DORADO CT 1051 DORADO CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402404200 6402404300 6402404400 _ _ J... -.-- _ - -lIiii' 1044 DORADO CT 1038 DORADO CT 1032 DORADO cr CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402404500 6402404600 6402404700 .____.^ ....w.. _ _ l' CITY OF CHULA VISTA 1026 DORADO CT 1020 DORADO CT C/O CITY MANAGE 27. CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ISTA CA 91910 6402404800 6402404900 6402800200 - - . -..:II -'·0 .... VILLA FJWŒRA HOMEOWNERS ASSN 987 E J 5T 993 E J ST - C/O AMERICAN PROP CARE SVC5 6150 MISSION GORGE RD '209 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SAN DIEGO CA 92120 6403400200 6403400300 6403400400 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P Y INVESTORS L CONS30URANCHO DEL REY INVES L CONS30'*RANCHO DEL REY tNVE --I. PROJEcr SERV C/O MO!ILLIN PR V C/O MCoIJILLI SERV 2727 H VB COVER AVE NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 ONAL CITY CA 91950 RATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403400500 6403400600 6403400700 RANCHO DEL REY IksTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY tNvEsTORS L P RANœO' DEL REY INVESTORS L P . CONS30tftRANCHO DEL REY INYESTORS L CONS30'IRANCHO DEL REY INVES ~ CONS30\#RANCHO DE INVESTORS L / C/O MOoULLIN PROJEÇl' SERV C/O MOo1ILLIN PROJE C/O MCoIJILL OJEcr SERV 2727 HOOVER ~ 2121 OOVER 2727 R AVE HATIO~ CA 91950 ~TIONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 ----_._--~- 6403400800 6403401000 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONS30\#RANCHO DEL --INVESTORS L OONS30\#RANCHO DEL RE OONS30\#RANCHO DE STORS L C/O MCMILLIN C/O MOULLIN C/O M PROJECT SERV 2727 H RAVE 2727 H 27 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403401100 6403401200 6403401300 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P OONS30\#RANCHO DE INVESTORS L CONS30\#RANCHO DEL STORS L 3210 C/O MCMILLI CT SERV AVE NATIONAL 91950 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403401400 6403401500 6403401600 - ~- RDR32~ "" RDR 3210 ,. CONS#RDR 3210 COHS#RDR 3210 . HOOVER A 2727 HOO VE 2727 H VE NATI~·-CITY CA 91950 N~IOÑAL CITY CA 91950 CITY CA 91950 ~ /" 6403401700 6403401800 6403..02100 - - RDR 3210 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P ---- CONS#RDR 3210 CONS30\#RANCHO DEL TORS L 2727 HOO 2727 H VE C/O MCMILLI CT SERV - 27 VER AVE NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403402200 6403402300 6403402400 - RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P ---" CON~INVESTORS L CONS30\#RANCHO DEL RE STORS L C/O MOIJILLIN P CT SERV C/O MOULLIN CT SERV C/ ILLIN PROJECT SERV 2727 H AVE 2727 RAVE 2"~27 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 NÃTIONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403402500 6403402600 6403402700 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVES OONS30\#RANCHO DEL REY~TORS L CONS30\#RANCHO DEL STORS L CONS30\# DEL REY INVESTORS L C/O MCMI~SERV C/O MCMILLI CT SERV CMILLIN PROJECT SERV 2727 HooVE 2727 RAVE 2727 HOOVER AVE " "ÑATIONAL CITY CA NATIOmu. CITY CA 91950 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403402800 6403402900 64.03403000 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONS30\#RAHCHO DEL --mvESTORS L CONS30\#RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS...lr- CONS30\lRANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L C/O MOo1ILLIN CT C/O MOULLIN PROJECT C/O MotlLLIN SERV 2127H9\' AVE 2727 HOOVER 272 AVE NATZONAL CITY CA 91950 HATI CITY CA 91950 RATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403403100 64.03403200 6403403800 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVE~ CONS30\#RANCHO DEL REY INVES L CONS30\lRARCHO DEL REY I L CONS30\#RANCHO ~ INVESTORS L C/O MCMILLIN PROJECT C/O MaofILLIN PR SERV C/O MCMILLIN PROJECT SERV 2727 2727 HooViiR VE 2727 HOOVER AVE HATI CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403403900 6403404000 6403404100 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONS30\#RANCHO DEL ~ CONS30\#RAN~-L CONS30~STORS L C/O MCMILLIN 7 ERV c/o MCMILLIN cr SERV C/O MOIl OJECT SERV 2727 HooVER.A 2727 HOOVER AVE 2727 rHOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 RATIONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 ( 6403404200 6403405300 6403405400 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REV INVESTORS~-- CONS30\#RANCHO Y INVESTORS L CONS30URANCHO DEL RE STORS L CONS30\ftRANCHO ~INVESTORS L C/O HCMI PROJEC"I' SERV CIO MCMILLIN CT SERV C/O ~ROJEcr SERV 2727 H AVE 2727, VER AVE -- 91950 DNAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403405500 6403405600 6403405700 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RDR 3210 RDR 3210 CONS30URANCHO DE L CONSftRDR CONSftRDR 3210 CIO MCMILL DJECT SERV 2127Hoo 2727 H VE 2727 HOÓVER AVE NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403405800 6403405900 6403406000 RDR 3210 RDR 3210 CONS#RDR 3210 CONSftRDR 3210 2727 HOOVER AVE 2727809 NATIONAL CITY 91950 NATIO CA 91950 CITY CA 91950 /' 6403406100 6403406200 6403406300 RDR 3210 RDR 3210 RDR 3210 CONS#RDR 3210 CONS#RDR 2721 ~ ~ NATIONAL C 91950 ITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403406400 6403408600 6403500700 RDR 3210 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONS#RDR 3210 -..' CONS30t#RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L ..--- 2727 HOOVER AVE C/O MCMILLIN PROJjCl' --st:RV 2121 HOO1ry:R~ NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 NAT¡ONÁL CITY CA 91950 6403500BOO 6403500900 6403501000 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX,REAL ESTATE CORP -- 5962 LA PLACE CT #250 5962 LA PLACE CT #250 5962 LA PLACE CT CARLSBAD CA 92008 9200B CARLS 92008 6403501100 6403501200 6403501300 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP 5962 LA PLACE CT ft~ ~- ~--- CARLSBAD CA .- 008 CARLS 92008 -~ 6403501400 6403501500 6403501600 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP 5962 LA PLACE CT ft250 5962 LA~ 5962 LA PLACE CT CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 ------'- 6403501700 6403501800 6.403501900 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP 5962 LA PLACE CT #250 5962 LA PLACE CT 1250 ~Õ --- CARLSBAD CA ~-92008 CARLSBAD CA___ 92008 CA 92008 - ------- - /' --_--I ( 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ... REGULO PL " 2313 ... REGULa PL ft 2314 ... REGULa PL .. 2315 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ... REGULa PL . 2316 ... REGULa PL · 2317 ... REGULa PL . 2318 ætJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ... REGULa PL . 2321 ... REGULa PL · 2322 ... REGULO PL .. 2323 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ... REGULO PL " 2324 ... REGULO PL · 2325 ... REGULO PL " 2326 CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ... REGULO PL " 2327 ... REGULO PL " 2328 ... REGULa PL " 2331 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDEtIT ... REGULO PL " 2332 ... REGULO PL " 2333 ... REGULa PL " 2334 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ... REGULa PL " 2335 ... REGULO PL " 2336 ... REGULO PL " 2337 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA ' CA 91910 6423921300 6423921400 RESIDENT CITY OF CHULA VISTA ... REGULa PL " 2338 CHUI..A VISTA CA 91910 00000 - 6403502000 6403502100 6403502200 ~" CEN'TEX REAL ESTATE CO CEN'TEX REAL ESTA 5962 LA P CT 1#250 CA 92008 6403502300 6403502400 6403502500 CEN'I'EX REAL ESTATE CO ....--- 5962 92008 92008 92008 ~ 6403502600 6403502700 6403502800 CEN'I'EX REAL ESTATE CORP CEN'I'EX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CÒRP S902~_ S902~' 5962 LA PLACE CT CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD 92008 CARLS 92008 ,.- -' 6403502900 6403503000 6403503100 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP .- S902~ 5962 LA PLACE CT 1#250 CARLSBAD 92008 CARl8~ 6403503200 6403503300 6403503400 CEN'I'EX REAL ES~ CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP 5962 LA PLACE 50 5962 LA P~ . CARLSB~ ~ 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 CA 92008 ,.-/ < ~ 6403503500 6403503600 6403503700 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP 5902 LA ~'_ S9S2 LA~- 5962~ CARLSBAD CA 2008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 ~~ 92008 6403503800 6403503900 6403504000 CEN'I'EX REAL ESTATE CORP CEN'I'EX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP 5962 LA PLACE CT '250 _____ 5962 LA PLACE CT 1#250 ~" CARLSBAD CA ~ ~~ CA 92008 ,.- 6403504.100 6403504200 6403504300 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P C'ENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CONS30URANCHO DEL REY I TORS L CONS30tl#RANCHO DEL REY IWES RSL S902~ C/O MCMILLIN PR SERV C/O MOo1ILLIN SERV 2727 VE 2727 RAVE CARLS CA 92008 NAL CITY CA 91950 TIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403505600 6403505700 6403505800 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONS30URANCHO D~STORS L CONS30URANCHO DEL REY I RSL CONS30'I#RANCHO DEL STORS L C/O MCMILLIN PRO SERV C/O MCMILLIN PR SERV C/O MOotILLIN C'I'SERV -' 2727 HOOVER AVE Hoo VE 2727 RAVE NATIONAL 'CITY CA 91950 CITY CA 91950 91950 ,,-," ._...~..- .--.-----.-- 6403505900 6403506000 6403506100 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONS30URANCHO DEL REY STORS L CONS30URANCHO DEL REY CONS30URANCHO DEL RE TORS L C/O Mc>tILLIN PR SERV C/O MOfILLIN PR C/O MOfILLI cr SERV 2727 BCOVE 272 VER AVE NATI CITY CA 91950 91950 TIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403506200 6403506300 6403506400 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP 5962 LA PLACE CT '25 5962 LA PLACE CT '25 5962 LA PLACE 50 92008 92008 92008 6403506500 6403506600 6403506700 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP CENTEX ~ 5962 LA PLACE CT 1250 ---------- 5..2 LA PLA~~ 5962 LA PLACE 0 CARLSBAD CA 92Ó-08 CARLSBAD CA 92008 ,.9JUoBB1J¡ CA .2008 - / / _/ 6403506800 6403507300 6403510100 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CENTEX REAL ESTATE CÇ..RP' ~ .-- CITY OF CHULA V~- . CONS30URANCHO DEL STORS L 5962 LA PLACE CT-t250 C/O MCMI~;N--PROJECT SERV C/O MOIl OJECT SERV / /' 2727JWOVERAVE 2 COVER AVE ./ CARLSBAI:> CA 9:2008 NA-rÍONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403510200 6403510300 640J510400 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONSJOURANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L CONS30'#RANCHO DEL REY I RSL CONSJO'IRANCHO DE INVESTORS L C/O MOoULLI~ yaoJEcr SERV C/O MCMILLIN PR SERV C/O MCMI PROJECT SERV 2727 H()()J¡gR AVE 2727 HOC VE V /' NATlOOAL CITY CA NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 91950 91950 640J510500 6403510600 6403510700 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO 'DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONS30\tRANCHO DEL REV "'INvESTORS L CONS30'IRANCHO DEL HEY INVESTORS L CONS30\tRANCHO DEL STORS L ./ C/O MCMILL~OJECT SERV C/O MCMILLIN CT SERV C/O MCMILL CT snv 2727 HOOVE AVE 2727 H AVE 27 AVE / - NATIoÑAL CITY CA 91950 ONAL CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403510800 6403510900 6403511000 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L 1:--- RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS ...p-,.- CONS30'#RANCHO DEL STORS L CONS30\tRANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L CONS30'IRANCHO D Y INVESTORS L C/O MC>1ILLIN CT SERV C/O M~V C/O MCMI PROJECT SER.V 2727HOO AVE 2727 H AVE CITY CA 91950 )l"r.fÔNAL CITY CA 91950 91950 6403511100 6403512700 6403512800 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONS30\tRANCHO DEL STORS L CONS30'IRANCHO DE STORS L SERV C/O MOULL OJECT SERV C/O MO!I 2727 AVE 27 VER AVE 27 NATIONAL CITY CA (NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 ' NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6403513000 6403513100 RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P RANCHO DEL RBY INVESTORS CONS30"RANCHO DEL INVESTORS L CONS30URANCHO DEL RE TORS L CONS30t#RANCHO D INVESTORS L C/O MCMILLIN SERV C/O MCMILLIN CT SERV C/O MaU ROJECT SERV 2727 H AVE 2727 AVE 2727 VER AVE / NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 TIONAL CITY CA 91950 pTIONAL CITY CA 91950 ._u_.._ \ 6403518200 640351B300 6403518400 RANCHO DEL REY RANCHO DEL REY RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P_ _ L L CONS30URANCHO D INVESTORS L C/O M PROJECT SERV HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 91950 NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 6420110300 6420110400 6420110500 - 1261 CAMINO CATALONIA 1263 CAMINO CATALONIA 1265 CAMINO CATALONIA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6420110600 6420111900 6420112000 - - 1267 CAMINO CATALONIA 891 PLAZA CATALONIA 89~ PLAZA CATALONIA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6420112100 6420112200 6420112300 899 PLAZA CATALONIA 898 PLAZA CATALONIA 894 PLAZA CATALONIA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6420112400 6420112500 6420112700 --- ~ SWNS#FOULK CARRIE L-SWNS#FOULK LISA OF 890 PLAZA CATALONIA 1256 CAMINO CATALONIA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 91950 , 6420113100 6420113200 6423110100 FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF CH CITY OF CHULA VISTA TAYLOR DAVID B&REBECCA 915 PASEO RANCHERO 1224 CALLE CANDELERO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHUIA VISTA CA 91910 .- 6423110200 6423110200 6423110300 RESIDENT* .. - 610 SM COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 1226 CALLE CANDELERO 1228 CALLE CANDELERO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 LEESBURG VA 22075 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423110400 6423110500 6423110500 - 54.4 LAUREl_ RESIDENT* 1230 CALLE CANDELERO 1232 CALLE CANDELERO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CAMARILLO CA 93012 6423110600 6423110600 6423110700 RESIDENT* 11 CATSPAW CPE 1235 CALLE CANDELERO 1239 CALLE CANDELERO CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 CORONADO CA 92118 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 .."-......."--.-.---- \ I 6423110800 6423110900 6423111000 - 1243 CALLE CANDELERO 1247 CALLE CANDELERO 1251 CALLE CANDELERO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6423111100 6423111100 6423111200 _f 11 . RESIDENT- UwJ'I'lZATARAIN BE'ITY 539 TELEGRAPH CANYON RD 1284 1255 CALLE CANPELERO 1259 CALLE CANtlELERO CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6423111300 6423111400 RESIDENT* 1263 CALLE CANDELERO POBOX 910 1267 CALLE CANDELERO CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 JAMUL CA 91935 6423111500 6423111600 6423111600 1 RESIDENT- 1271 CALLE CANDELERO 434 BLUME ST 1275 CALLE CANDELERO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 NlPOMO CA 93444 6423111700 6423111800 6423111900 - - 1279 CALLE CANDELERO 1283 CALLE CANDELERO 1287 CALLE CANDELERO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423140100 6423140200 6423140300 - l - ....-... 1211 CALLE SANTIAGO 1215 CALLE SANTIAGO 1219 CALLE SANTIAGO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423140400 6423140500 6423140600 1223 CALLE SANTIAGO 1227 CALLE SANTIAGO 1231 CALLE SANTIAGO CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423140700 6423140700 6423140800 RESIDENT· 1S 0 SOLEDAD DR 1235 CALLE SANTIAGO 1239 CALLE SANTIAGO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 MONTEREY CA 93940 OIULA VISTA CA 91910 Ei42~140900 6423140900 6423141000 - ..-- j RESIDENT· 1243 CALLE SANTIAGO 1243 CALLE SANTIAGO 1247 CALLE SANTIAGO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHelA VISTA CA 91910 -~--- 6423141100 6423141200 6423141300 - '-'--- - 1251 CALLE SANTIAGO 1255 CALLE SANTIAGO 1284 CALLE CANDELERO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423141400 6423141500 6423141600 - I 1280 CALLE CANDELERO 1276 CALLE CANDELERO 1272 CALLE CANDELERO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423141700 6423141800 6423141900 - 1268 CALLE CANDELERO 1264 CALLE CANDELERO 1260 CALLE CANDELERO CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 , 6423142000 6423142100 6423142200 - - 1256 CALLE CANDELERO 1252 CALLE CANDELERO 1248 CALLE CANDELERO CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423142300 6423142300 6423142400 .- - ~SIDENT' ----- -. 1244 CALLE CANDELERO 1240 CALLE CANDELERO 4190 BONITA RD #106 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423150100 6423150200 6423150300 J 1208 CALLE SANTIAGO 1212 CALLE SANTIAGO 1216 CALLE SANTIAGO C'HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423150400 6423150500 6423150500 .._. _..ww_ .. -. . RESIDENT· 1220 CALLE SANTIAGO 2728 PASEO POTRIL 1224 CALLE SANTIAGO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 C'HULA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 6423150600 6423150700 6423200100 ------ .-.- ~ 1228 CALLE SANTIAGO 1232 CALLE SANTIAGO 1204 CORTE DE CERA C'HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423200200 6423200300 6423200400 - - 1208 CORTE DE CERA 1:2 12 CORTE DE CERA 1216 CORTE DE CERA C'HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ---... ,,---. ------.- 6423200500 6423200600 6423200700 f 1220 CORTE DE CERA 1224 CORTE DE CERA 1228 CORTE DE CERA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423200800 6423200800 6423200900 RESIDENT* 11 CATSPAW CPE 1235 CORTE DE CERA 1231 CORTE DE CERA OIULA VISTA CA 91910 CORONADO CA 92118 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423201000 6423201100 6423201200 1227 CORTE DE CERA 1223 CORTE DE CERA 1219 CORTE DE CERA CHULA VISTA CA 915110 CHULA VISTA CA 915110 CHULA VISTA CA 915110 6423201300 6423201400 6423201500 - - - 1215 CORTE DE CERA 1211 CORTE DE CERA 1207 CORTE DE CERA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423201600 6423201700 6423201800 - HWJT#INFANTE REf'UGIO SR&GUADALUPE - 1206 CORTE DE VELA 1210 CORTE DE VELA 1214 CORTE DE VELA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423201900 6423201900 6423202000 RESIDENT* 123.8 CORTE DE VELA 1218 CORTE DE VELA 1222 CORTE DE VELA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423202100 6423202200 6423202300 u_ U - 1226 CORTE DE VELA 1230 CORTE DE VELA C/O PA'ClaA SAFLAR 744 OTAY LAKES RD #153 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423202300 6423202400 6423202500 RESIDENT* - 1234 CORTE DE VELA 1237 CORTE DE VELA 1233 CORTE DE VELA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423202600 6423202600 6'423202700 - - J RESIDENT* 562 PORT HARWICK 1229 CORTE DE VELA 1225 CORTE DE VELA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91913 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 -_._-~_.- I \ 6423202800 6423202800 6423202900 RESIDENT- . NAVAL WAR. COLLEGE 1221 CORTE DE VELA 1217 CORTE DE VELA CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 NEWPORT RI 02841 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423203000 6423203100 6423203200 ~ 1213 CORTE DE ~ 1209 CORTE DE VELA 950 VALENCIA CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423203300 6423203300 6423203400 -.. - RESIDENT- 1562 HAVENWOOD DR OS, VALENCIA CT 958 VALENCIA CT c:HULA VISTA CA 91910 OCEANSIDE CA 92056 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423203500 6423203600 6423203600 IfESIDENT" 962 VALENCIA CT 34 TURKEY MEADOW RD >.. VALENCIA CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 TRUMBULL CT 06611 6423205600 CITY OF CHULA VISTA C/O CITY MANAGER 276 FOURTH AVE CA 91910 , .~......_-_..__._------- ( ! 5921210500 5921921600 5921921800 CITY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF CHULA VISTA cia PROPERTY DEPT c/o CITY 202 C ST 276 PO SAN DIEGO CA 92101 91910 ;' \ 6400101900 6400102200 6400102500 CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY OF CHULA VISTA c/o MC MILLIN D 2727HOO 91950 00000 6400301200 6400301700 6400302200 CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY OF CHtJLA VISTA CITY OF CHULA VISTA C/O MC MILLIN ~ c/o Me MILLIN DEVELOPMENT ___ -/ 27~ 2127 HOOVER AVE .-----' ~T CITY CA 91950 NATIONAL c;¡~cÁ 91950 AGENCY 00000 - _/ 6402910400 6402910500 6402910600 NAVARRA JEROME FAMILY TRU ~-. CHEVRON USA INC NSNS1/3*NAVARRA TRUST 12·16· POBOX 285 2181 GUY ST 2181 GUY HOUSTON TX 77001 SAN DIEGO CA 92103 IEGO CA 92103 6402910700 6402911300 6402911400 CITY OF CHULA VISTA HOME DEPOT USA INC CITY OF CHt1LA VISTA c/o Me MILLIN DEVELOPl$NT- POBOX 816368 / 2727 HOOVER~______ NATIONß1o- 'CITY CA 91950 DALLAS TX 75381 PUBL CY 00000 - 6402921900 6402922000 6402923600 LEISERV INC ICMART CORPORATIO~ 4180 CIO BILL BRIODY KMART CORP #7636 520 LAKE COOK RD #420 700 S ORANGE AVE 1A CA 92037 DEERFIELD IL 60015 WEST COVINA CA 91790 6402923700 6402923900 6402924000 KMART CORPORATION STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY STANDARD INSURANCE KMAR~- CIO TAX DEPT CIO TAX DEPT 700 S ORANG POBOX 711 POBOX 7 ~S INA CA 91790 PORTLAND OR 97207 PO OR 97207 6402924100 6402924200 6402924300 CITY OF CHtJLA VISTA CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY OF CHULA VISTA -- PUBLIC AG~ ,~. PUBLIC AGENCY 0 ,.. 6402924400 6402924600 6402924700 PASEO CORNERS LTC PETSMART INC CORNERS PASEO LTC 4180 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR #300 10000 N 31ST AVE #C300 4180 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR '300 LA JOLLA CA 92037 PHOENIX AZ 85051 LA JOLLA CA 92037 ..--- - ~---.----_._.._.__..._---_._-~...._- (, I 6402924800 64029249<10 6402930300 PRICE ENTERPRISES INC PRICE COMPANY 'I1Œ CLARK REAL ESTATE GROUP INC clO PRICE REAL ESTATE INC 2641 ARIANE DR 4180 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR '300 - / 4649 MORENA BLVD r SAN DIEGO CA 92117 SAN DIEGO CA 92117 92037 6402930400 6402930600 6402931200 E D D PARTNERS NO 1 - 9645 GRANITE RIDGE DR '170 750 OTAY LAKES RD 3861 GRANDVIEM' PL SAN DIEGO CA 9.2123 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 6402931300 6402931400 6402931500 CITY OF CHULA VISTA - C/O MC MILLIN DEVELO~--- - 2"727 272~ POBOX 68 NAT! 91950 NA:ION TY CA 91950 BONITA CA 91908 6402931600 6402931700 6402932000 LOT 27 LAND PARTNERS -- CONS#LOT 27 LAND PAATNERS·CONS#LOT 865 AMENA CT C/O INTERN'TL R E 2320 PASEO DE LAS AMERICAS '200 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 VISTA CA 91910 SAN YSIDRO CA 92173 6402932100 6402932200 6402932300 SAN DIEGO QAS&.ELECTRIC CO , CLARK REAL ESTATE GROUP INC ROHR FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ~~ 4180 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR #300 279 F ST 00000 LA JOLLA CA 92037 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402932400 6402932600 6403300100 R D R INVESTORS 200-CHULA VISTA L P CONSHR D R INVESTORS*CONSHR D R INV PACIFIC SOtn'HWEST ASSN OF REALTORS OONS#200-CHULA VISTA L P C/O INTERNATIONAL REAL ESTATE C/O MARK MARæAND C/O CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES 2320 PASEO DE LAS AMERICAS H200 880 CANARIOS CT 4365 EXECUTIVE DR #600 SAN DIEGO CA 92173 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SAN DIEGO CA 92121 6403300200 6403300600 6403300700 200-CHULA VISTA L P 200-CHULA VISTA L P 200~CHULA VISTA L P --- C/O CORNESTONE OO~1u:rU!'IES C/O OORNESTONE~ITIES C/O OORNESTONE COMMUNI 4365 EX~ DR 1600 4365 EXECU'I'I #600 ~1600 s.ut"'15ÍEGO CA 92121 SAN c:A 92121 DIEGO CA 92121 6403300800 6403300900 6403301000 200-CHULA VISTA L P 200-CHULA VISTA L P 200-CHULA VISTA L P C/O OORNESTONE COMMUNITIES C/O OORNESTONE COMMUNITIES CIO CORIlESTONE s 4365 ~600 4365 EXECUTI 600 4365 IVE DR '600 SAN DIE 92121 c:A 92121 DIEGO CA 92121 6403301100 6403301200 6403302200 200-CHULA VISTA L P 200-CHULA VISTA L P 20D-CHULA ~ C/O CORNESTONE s C/O OORNESTONE- T'''''-- C/O OORNESTONE ITIES 4365 EXE DR .600 4365 EXE DR 1600 4365 ~IVE DR 1600 SAN 92121 IEGO c:A 92121 .,S.'IIÓD'EGO c:A 92121 < I 6403302300 6403302400 6403302500 200-CHULA VISTA L P 200-CHULA VISTA L P ____ 20Q-CHULA VISTA L P CONS#200-CIroLA VISTA.-h-"'P - - C/O CORNESTONE~ITIES --- C/O CO 1TIES C~~ COMMtJNITIES -~ ~IVE DR #600 4365 lVB DR #600 ~ CUTlVE DR #600 DIEGO CA 92121 DIEGO CA 92121 SAN DIEGO CA 92121 6403302600 6403303000 6403303100 200-CHULA VISTA L P CONS#20Q-CHULA VISTA LP--- ASPIRE-ENCORE AT RANCHO DE YROM ASPIRE-ENCORE AT RANCHO DE~,REY ROM --- C/O ~ITIES C/O CORNERSTONE 1TIES C/O CORNERSTONE ITIES 4365 IVB DR #600 4365 DR '600 4365 EX! DR '600 ...--- SJd't DIEGO CA 92121 DIEGO CA 92121 S lEGO CA 92121 6403303200 6403303300 6403303400 200 CHULA VISTA LTD PTNSHP 200-CHULA VISTA L P 200-CHULA VISTA L P C/O CORNESTONE S C/O CORNESTONE 4365 EXECUTI 4365 EXE R '600 92121 SAN D GO CA 92121 6403303800 6403304000 6403304100 ASPIRE-ENCORE AT RANCHO DEL REY HOM 20Q-CHULA VISTA L P 200-CHULA VISTA L P C/O CORNERSTONE COMMUNI~-- C/O CORNESTONE COMMUN..!.VES'- C/O CORNESTONE COMMUN S---- --- 4365 EX~OO 436~O 4365 EXE R #600 SAN 01 92121 SAN 01 92121 EGO CA 92121 / .. 6423910400 6423910600 6423910700 RANCHO OELREY INVESTORS L ~~_- CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY OF c:HU1..A VISTA C/O MCofILLIN COM~~ C/O MC MILLIN DEVELOPMga~- C/O MC MILL~fIf.ŒNT 2727 HOOVE~_~W 2727 HOO~ 27~ VE NATION~tITY CA 91950 NATIgNAL CITY CA 92050 NA ONAL CITY CA 91950 / / . 6423910800 6423920500 6423921100 CITY OF CHULA VISTA ~ CITY OF~- C/O MC MILLIN DEjœL PMENT C/O MC MILLIN DEVE 4715 VIEWRIDGE AVE #100 /' 2727 HOOvç~VE 2727 HOOVE /- NAT;ONAL CITY CA 92050 NA':t'¡QIQL CITY CA 91950 SAN DIEGO CA 92123 / 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 PARKVIEW VILLAGE WEST RESIDENT RESIDENT C/O R&.B REALTY GROUP/GARRY GRUBBS 1200 PASEO MAGDA # 411 1200 PASEO MAGDA · 412 2222 CORINTH AVE CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 LOS ANGELES CA 90064 6423921200 6423921200 642~921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1200 PASEO MAGDA . 413 1200 PASEO MAGDA . 414 1200 PASEO MAGDA · US CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1200 PASEO MAGDA . 416 1200 PASEO MAGDA # 417 1200 PASEO MAGDA · 418 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 \ I . 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1200 PASED MAGDA # 421 1200 PASEO MAGDA # 422 1200 PASEO MAGDA · 423 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1200 PABEO MAGDA 1# 424 1200 PASEO MAGDA · 425 1200 PASEO MAGDA " 426 CHeLA VISTA CA 91910 æuLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1200 PASEO MAGDA . 427 1200 PASEO MAGDA · 428 1210 PASEO MAGDA 1311 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1210 PASEO MAGDA # 312 1210 PASEO MAGDA , 313 1210 PASED MAGDA # 314 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1210 PASED MAGDA # 315 1210 PASED MAGDA # 316 1210 PASED MAGDA · 317 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1210 PASEO MAGDA # 318 1210 PABED MAGDA # 321 1210 PABEO MAGDA # 322 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1210 PASED MAGDA 1 323 1210 PASED MAGDA · 324 1210 PABEO MAGDA # 325 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1210 pABEO MAGDA # 326 1210 PABEO MAGDA .. 327 1210 PASEO MAGDA · 328 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 c::HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1220 PASEO MAGDA IS11 1220 PASEO MAGDA · 512 1220 PABEO MAGDA 1513 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHUIA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 I , 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT - RESIDENT 1220 PASEO MAGDA # 514 1220 PASED MAGDA ,. 51S 1220 PASEO MAGDA , 516 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1220 PASED MAGDA .. 517 1220 PASEO MAGDA , 518 1220 PASEe MAGDA . 521 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1220 PABEO MAGDA " 522 1220 PABEO MAGDA # 523 1220 PABED MAGDA . 524 CHt1LA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1220 PASEO MAGDA # 525 1220 PASED MAGDA # 526 1220 PABEO MAGDA It 527 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1220 PASED MAGDA .. 528 1230 PAS£O MAGDA # 211 1230 PASED MAGDA # 212 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1230 PASEO MAGDA # 213 1230 PMEO MAGDA # 214 1230 PASEO MAGDA # 215 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1230 PMEO MAGDA .. 216 1230 PABEO MAGDA , 217 1230 PASEO MAGDA .. 218 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 C'HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 . 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1230 PABEO twIDA # 221 1230 PASEO MAGDA .. 222 1230 PMEO MAGDA .. 223 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 C'HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDEm' 1230 PMEO MAGDA .. 224 1230 PABEO MAGDA .. 225 1230 PABEO MAGDA .. 226 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 _._-~- . "...,,-.--- ( 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1230 PASEO MAGDA # 227 1230 PASEQ MAGDA · 228 1230 PASEa MAGDA · 231 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1230 PABED MAGDA . 232 1230 PABED MAGDA · 233 1230 PABED MAGDA · 234 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91no 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1230 PASEa MAGDA # 235 1230 PASED MAGDA .. 236 1230 PASED MAGDA # 237 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1230 PASED MAGDA # 238 1240 PASED MAGDA · 611 1240 PASED MAGDA · 612 CHULA VISTA CA !H910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1240 PASED MAGDA # 613 1240 PASEa MAGDA 1614 1240 PASEa MAGDA # 615 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1240 PASEO MAGDA .. 616 1240 PASEO MAGDA · 617 1240 PASEO MAGDA .. 618 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1240 PASEO MAGDA .. 621 1240 PASEO MAGDA .. 622 1240 PASEO MAGDA , 623 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1240 PASEO ~A .. 624 1240 PASEO MAGDA , 625 1240 PASEO MAGDA " 626 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1240 PASEO MAGDA .. 627 1240 PASEO MAGDA · 628 1240 PASEO MAGDA " 631 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ( 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1240 PASEO MAGDA 4# 632 1240 PASEO MAGDA · 633 1240 PASEO MAGDA . 634 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1240 PASEO MAGCA . 635 1240 PASEO MAGDA · 636 1240 PASEO MAGDA ., 637 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 c:HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1240 PASEO MAGDA . 638 1250 PASEO MAGDA · 711 1250 PASEO MAGDA .. 712 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA V~-STA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1250 PASEO MAGDA it 713 1250 PASEO MAGDA .. 714 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 715 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1250 PASEO MAGDA # i'16 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 717 1250 PASEO MAGDA .. 718 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 721 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 722 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 723 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 724 1250 PASEO twJDA · 725 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 726 cmn..A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1250 PASEO MAGDA .. 727 1250 PASEO MAGDA .. 728 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 731 cmn..A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6.423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1250 PASEO MAGDA .. 732 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 733 1250 PASEO MAGDA # 734 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 .-~...-----_._---~~- --.~--_.- i . 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1250 PASEO MAGDA , 735 1250 PASEO MAGDA , 736 1250 PASEQ MAGDA " 737 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 125D PASEO MAGDA " 738 1260 PASEO MAGDA , III 1260 PASEO MAGDA " 112 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 C'HULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 113 1260 PASEO MAGDA , 114 1260 PASEO MAGDA . 115 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHt.1LA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1260 PASEO MAGDA " 116 1260 PASEO M1\GDA , 117 1260 PASEO MAGDA " 118 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1260 PASEa MAGDA , 121 1260 PASED MAGDA , 122 1260 PASEO MAGDA , 123 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 124 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 125 1260 PASEO MMIDA # 126 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 127 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 128 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 131 CEItJIA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 132 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 133 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 134 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6423921200 6423921200 6423921200 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 135 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 136 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 137 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 -,~--_.~---_._-- I , i 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT .2. REGULO PL " 1912 .2. REGULa PL '" 1913 '2' REGULO PL ,. 1914 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT '2' REGULO PL # 1915 '2' REGULa PL # 1916 .2. REGULa PL . 1917 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 82. REGULa PL " 1918 82. REGULa PL , 1921 82. REGULO PL . 1922 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 82' REGULO PL .. 1923 82. REGULa PL " 1924 82' REGULO PL # 1925 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 82. REGULO PL " 1926 82. REGm..O PL # 1927 82. REGULO PL " 1928 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT .2. REGULO PL " 1931 82' REGULO PL .. 1932 82. REGULO PL " 1933 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 82. REGULa PI. H 1934 82. REGULO PL # 1935 82. REGULO PL # 1936 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT .2. REGULO PL .. 1937 82. REGULO PL # 1938 83. REGULa PL # 2011 CHtJI.A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 83. REGULO PI. # 2012 83. REGULO P~ .. 2013 83. REGULa PI. # 2014 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 -.-----<- 6423921200 64239213.00 6423921300 RESIDENT R&B EXECUTIVE INVESTMENTS-MARBRISAS RESIDENT 1260 PASEO MAGDA # 138 C/O R&B REALTY GROUP 820 REGULO PL · 1811 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 2222 CORINTH AVE C1lUIA VISTA CA 91910 LOS ANGELES CA 90064 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 820 REGULO PL . 1812 820 REGULO PL · 1813 820 REGULO PL · 1814 CHUlA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 œcLA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 820 REGULO PL . 1815 820 REGULa PL · 1816 820 REGULO PL · 1817 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 820 REGULO PL .. 1818 820 REGULO PL .. 182-1 820 REGULa PL .. 1822 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 820 REGULO PL .. 1823 820 REGULO PL # 1824 820 REGULO PL .. 1825 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 820 REmn..O PL # 1826 820 REGULO PL # 1827 820 REGULO PL # 1828 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 820 REGULO PL # 1831 820 REGULa PL # 1832 820 REGULO PL # 1833 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 820 REGULO p¡. , 1834 820 REGULO PL · 1835 820 REGULO PL .. 1836 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6:123921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 820 REGULO PL .. 1837 820 REGULO PL .. 1838 82. REGULO PL # 1911 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 " ------ --"-.------ I 6423921300 64239213.QO 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 830 REGULa PL . 2015 830 REGULa PL . 2016 830 REGULa PL .. 2017 c:HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 830 REGULa PL , 2018 830 REGULO PI. , 2021 830 REGULa PL # 2022 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 830 REGULO PI. , 2023 830 REGULO PI. " 2024 830 REGULO PI. , 2025 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIÐENT RESIDENT 830 REGULa PL .. 2026 830 REGULO PL " 2027 830 REGULO PI. # 2028 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 830 REGULO PL # 2031 830 REGULa PL " 2032 830 REGULO PL " 2033 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 830 REGULO PL . 2034 830 REGULO PL " 2035 830 REGULa PL " 2036 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 830 REGULa PL .. 2037 830 REGULa PL .. 2038 83. REGULa PL .. 2111 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtn.A VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 83. REGULO PL .. 2112 83. REGULO PL . 2113 83. REGULa PL .. 2114 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 83. REGULa PL .. 2121 83' REGULO PL .. 2122 83. REGULa PL .. 2123 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 .---- l 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT '3' REGULO PL ff 2124 ..0 REGULa PL " 2211 ..0 REGOLO PL " 2212 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ..0 REGULa PL .. 2213 ..0 REGULa PL # 2214 "0 REGULO PL · 2215 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ..0 REGULa PL # 2216 ..0 REGULa PL .. 2217 "0 REGULa PL # 2218 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT "0 REGULa PL ., 2221 "0 REGULa PL " 2222 ..0 REGULO PL # 2223 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 642392i300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ..0 REGULO PL " 2224 ..0 REGULO PL # 2225 ..0 REGULa PL It 2226 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ..0 REGULa PL .. 2227 ..0 REGULa PL # 2228 ..0 REGULO PL # 2231 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ..0 REGULO PL .. 2232 ..0 REGULO PL it 2233 ..0 REGCLO PL · 2234 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ..0 REGULO PL . 2235 "0 REGCLO PL .. 2236 ..0 REGULa PL · 2237 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6423921300 6423921300 6423921300 '. RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT "0 REGULa PL . 2238 844 REGULO PL .. 2311 ... REGULO PL · 2312 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 .....,,_.. .. ~_..-..._-----_......_.._--_..~,_..__. \ 5921921200 5921922300 5921922300 CITY OF CHULA VISTA BEACON COVE LTD RESIDENT C/O CITY MANAGER 5550 BALTIMORE DR 500 E H ST * 1 276 FOURTH CHULA VISTA CA 91910 IBTA CA 91910 LA MESA CA 91942 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 500 E H ST * 2 500 E H.ST * 3 500 E H ST * . CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 500 E H ST * 5 500 E H ST * " 500 E H ST * 7 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT SOD E H ST * 8 500 E H ST * . 500 E H ST * 10 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 500 E H ST * 11 500 E H ST * 12 500 E H ST * 13 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 500 E H ST * 14 SOD E H ST * 15 500 E H ST * 1" CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 JlESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 510 E H ST * 17 510 E H ST * 18 510 E H ST * i' CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 510 E H ST * 20 510 E H ST * 21 510 E H ST . 22 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ætJLA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 510 E H ST * 23 510 E H ST * 2. 510 E H ST * 25 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 I I , 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 510 E H ST I 2' 510 E H ST I 27 510 E H ST I 2. CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 æuLA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 510 E H ST I 2. 510 E H ST I 30 510 E H ST I 31 c:HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 510 E H ST I 32 520 E H ST I 33 520 E H ST I 34 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 520 E H ST I 35 520 E H ST I 3' 520 E H ST I 37 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 520 E H ST 138 520 E H ST 139 520 E H ST I 40 OWLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 520 E H ST 141 520 E H ST I 42 520 E H ST I 43 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 520 E H ST 144 520 E H ST I 45 520 E H ST I 4' CHUI..A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 520 ERST I .7 520 E H ST I 4. 530 E H ST I 4' CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 - RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 530 E H ST I 50 530 E H ST I 51 530 E H ST I 52 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 \ 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 530 E H ST 8 53 530 E H ST 8 S' 530 E H ST 8 S5 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 530 E H ST 8 56 530 E H ST 8 57 530 E H ST 8 58 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 530 E H ST 8 5. 530 E H ST 8 60 530 E H ST 8 61 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 530 E H ST 8 62 530 E H ST 8 63 530 E H ST 8 6. CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 536 E H ST 540 E H ST 8 65 540 E H ST 8 66 CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 540 E H ST 8 67 540 E H ST 8 68 540 E H ST 8 6. CHULA VISTA CA . 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 540 E H ST 8 70 540 E H ST 871 540 E H ST 8 72 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 540 E H ST 873 540 E H ST 8 7. 540 E H ST 8 75 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 540 E H ST 8 76 540 E H ST #. 77 540 E H ST 8 78 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ------ --..---------- - --"---.--- ~ 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 540 E H ST .79 540 E H ST · 80 SSO E H ST · 81 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 550 E H ST . 82 550 E H ST · 83 550 E H ST · 8. CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 550 E H ST . 85 550 E H ST · 8. 550 E H ST · 87 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VI.STA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT SSO E H ST 8 88 550 E H ST · 8. SSO E H ST · 9D CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 550 E H ST 8 '1 550 E H ST 8 '2 sso E H ST · 93 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDEN'l' 550 E H ST 8 .. SSO E H ST 8 .5 sse E H ST · .. CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 560 E H ST « '7 560 E H ST · '8 560 E H ST · .. CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 560 E H ST . 100 560 E H ST · 101 560 E H ST · 102 c:HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 - RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 560 E H ST . 103 560 E H ST · 104 560 E H ST # 105 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 , --~,.. - --- ----------, ( I 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 560 E H ST .. 106 560 E H ST . 107 560 E H S'I' .. 108 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 560 E H ST ., 109 560 E H ST ., 110 560 E H ST 8111 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 560 E H ST " 112 570 E H ST . 113 570 E H ST . 114 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 570 E H ST # 115 570 E H ST .. 116 570 E H ST # 117 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 570 E H ST # 118 570 E H 5T # 119 570 E H ST . 120 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 570 E H ST · 121 570 E H ST # 122 570 E H ST It 123 CHlTlJ\ VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 570 E H ST · 124 570 E H ST It 125 570 E H ST 1# 126 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 570 E H ST · 127 570 E H ST , 128 580 E H ST .. 129 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 :RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 580 E H ST · 130 580 E H ST . 131 580 E H ST . 132 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 --'"------- I I , 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 580 E H ST .. 133 580 E H ST , 134 580 E H ST .. 135 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5~21922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT Saa E H ST " 136 580 E H ST . 137 . 580 E H 8T ,. 138 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 c:HCLA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 580 E H 5T . 139 sea E H 5T . 140 580 E H ST #141 C'HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 580 E H ST " 142 580 E H ST " 143 580 E H ST " 144 C'HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 590 E H ST .. 145 590 E H ST .. 146 590 E H ST # 147 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 590 E H ST " 148 590 E H ST # 149 590 E H ST # 150 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 590 E H ST # 151 590 E H ST # 152 590 E H ST # 153 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 590 E H ST # 154 590 E H ST # 155 590 E H ST # 156 CHtJ1.A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5.921922300 . RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 590 E H ST . 157 590 E H ST # 158 590 E H ST # 159 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 œt1LA VISTA CA 91910 -+._._-~--_._._.._-_.- ..,..., \ 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 590 E H ST · 160 596 E H ST # 161 596 E H 8T # 162 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESInEm' 596 E H ST · 163 596 E H ST . 164 596 E H ST # 165 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 596 E H ST · 166 596 E H ST # 167 596 E H ST . 168 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 596 E H ST It 169 596 E H ST # 170 596 E H ST # 171 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 5921922300 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 596 E H ST # 172 596. E H ST # 173 596 E H ST . 174 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 5921922300 5921922300 6390301600 - RESIDENT RESIDENT 596 E H ST 11 175 596 E H ST . 176 c/o LAWRENCE HERMAN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 cmJLA VISTA CA 91910 POBOX 24099 LOS ANGELES CA 90024 6391920900 6391920900 6391931100 RESIDENT* - 418 WINTERGREEN PL 543 BERLAND WY 542 BERLAND WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SAN MARCOS CA 92069 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6392310400 6392310500 6392310600 ........... - - i - - 802 HALECREST DR 796 LORI LN , 792 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6392320700 6392320800 6392320900 - - 801 HALECREST DR 806 LORI LN 810 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 -- --~- -" --.,,--.".--. \ 6392321000 6392330100 6392330200 _: . Bl8 LORI LN 791 LORI LN 795 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 n. 6392330300 6392330300 6392330400 RESIDENT· ----.. 6126 MORNING RIDGE erR 7" LORI LN 803 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ALEXANDRIA VA 22310 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6392330500 6392330600 6392330700 - - - - -. 80S LORI LN 801 LORI LN 636 VIA ARMADO CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 C1RJLA VISTA CA 91910 6392330700 6392330800 6392330900 RESIDENT· --. - 80. LORI LN 811 LORI LN 815 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6392331000 6392331100 6392331200 .... - --0 lL Ell 7 LORI LN 819 LORI LN 821 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6392331400 6392340700 6395300600 - - . 823 LORI LN 801 DAVID DR 845 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6395300700 6395300800 6395300900 SMNSl!2#"LUCK TONY R - - 841 LORI LN 837 LORI LN 833 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 æuLA VISTA CA 91910 6395301000 6395301200 6395301300 . 829 LORI LN 826 LORI LN 830 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6395301400 6395301500 6395301600 ,. - - . 834 LORI LN 838 LORI LN 842 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 --.--- \ 6395301700 6395301800 6395302800 - - 846 LORI LN 850 LORI LN 825 LORI IoN CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396900100 6396900200 6396900300 - " 546 EAST J ST 554 EAST J ST 562 EAST J ST CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396900400 6396900500 6396900600 1 , - 570 EAST J ST 578 EAST J ST 586 E J ST OIULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396900700 6396900800 6396900900 - "I ~^" 600 E J ST 604 EAST J ST 608 EAST J ST CH1JLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396901000 6396901100 6396901200 - 612 E J ST 616 EAST J ST 620 E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396901300 6396901400 6396901500 l' --.. - - 624 E J ST 628 E J ST 632 BAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396901600 6396901700 6396901800 ".n. .--- - - Ih - 636 EAST J ST 640 EAST J ST 644 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396901900 6396902000 6396902100 .""0.." ""_n_ NSNS#KRUEGER BARBARA F TR ~"o ~. L 648 EAST J ST 547 BERLAND WAY 553 BERLAND WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396902200 6396902300 6396902300 ,- - NSJT#CANETl' SAµ. C p L 561 BERLAND WAY POBOX 120303 569 BERLAND WY CHULA VISTA CA nno CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91912 ---- ( 6396902400 6396902500 6396902600 - _u,.n ~ 577 BERLAND WAY 585 BERLAND WAY 731 LORI LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396902700 6396902800 6396902900 751 LORI LN 771 LORI LN 770 LORI LN CHULA VISTA 'CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396903000 6396903100 6396903200 - - 590 BERLAND WAY 582 BERLAND WAY 574 BERLAND WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 6396903300 6396903400 6396903500 - 566 BERLAND WAY 558 BERLAND WAY SSO BERLAND WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396906400 6396906500 6396906600 545 EAST J ST 553 E J ST 557 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396906700 6396906800 6396906900 UMNssot#SIM SENGLY - 561 EAST J ST 565 E J ST 571 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396907000 6396907100 6396907200 577 EAST J ST 58; EAST J ST SB9 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396907300 6396907400 6396907500 - .. -.-- 601 EAST J ST 603 EAST J ST 605 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396907600 6396907700 . 6396907900 - -"·T 1 607 EAST J ST 609 E J ST 61\. E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ( 6396907900 63969080<10 6396908100 613 EAST J ST US EAST J ST 619 EAST J ST CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396908200 6396908300 6396908400 I1f . __'""~ u 623 EAST J ST 625 EAST J ST 627 BAST J ST CHULA. VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396908500 6396908500 639U08600 - '--.IDENT- - 631 E J ST 635 EAST J ST 815 3RD AVE CHULA VISTA CA 91910 C'HULA VISTA CA 91911 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6396908900 6400503200 6401010200 tþRANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS L P CONS30tjRANCHO DEL STORS L . 641 EAST J ST C/O MCofILLI CT SERV 668 EAST J ST RAVE CHULA VISTA CA 91910 91950 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401010300 6401010400 6401010500 - 670 E J ST 672 E J ST 674 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401010600 6401010700 6401010800 - - 676 EAST J ST 669 VIA CURVADA 665 VIA CURVADA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401010900 6401010900 64010110,00 - RESIDENT* 744 TWIN OAKS AVE ..1 VIA CURVADA 657 VIA CURVADA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6401011100 6401011200 6401011200 - - -.....- - .. --- RESIDENT* 653 VIA CURVADA 2924 SANDOVER cr ... VIA CURVADA CHCLA VISTA CA 91nO CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 6401011300 6401011400 6401011500 645 VIA CURVAÐA 641 VIA ctJRVADA 659 MISSION cr CHUI..Þ. VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ._.,'",._""____.,__._H_'. ( I 6401011500 6401011600 6401011700 RESIDENT- 6" VIA CURVADA 633 VIA C'CRVADA 804 DUEN TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401011800 6401011900 6401011900 SMJT#ITURBE LIBRADO P*SMJTftlTURBE F RESIDENT· 810 BDEN TIEMPO DR 2555 I~ C'I' 814 BDEN TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SAN DIEGO CA 92111 6401012000 6401012100 6401012200 HWJTl/2#DECDEH ZOHAIR H&NADIA D - -- - - BIB BUEN TIEMPO DR 822 BURN TIEMPO DR 826 BUER TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401012300 6401012400 6401012500 - -.-.-.. - -- -- 830 BVEN TIEMPO DR 834 BeEN TIEMPO DR POBOX 3304 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91909 6401012500 6401020100 6401020200 RESIDENT· 838 BUEN TIEMPO DR 839 BUEN TIEMPO DR 835 BUER TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401020300 6401020400 6401020500 .. _.- --- - -. 831 BUEN TIEMPO DR 644 CORTE CERRADA 648 CORTE CERRADA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401020600 6401020700 6401020700 - - RESIDENT· 647 CORTE CERRADA 643 CORTE CERRADA 6.3 CORTE CERRADA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401020800 6401020900 6fOl021000 - ...-'-.... u.~.._ - .._~ ..- 639 CORTE CERRADA 640 VIA CCRVADA 644 VIA CCRVADA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401021100 6401021200 6"401021300 - L 648 VIA CURVADA 652 VIA CURVADA 658 VIA CCRVADA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 __~____m__~.~_._"_._~_.'__. _..~_ t 6401021400 6401021500 6401021600 UHJT'OSUNA IRMA 664 VIA CURVADA 830 LA SENDA WAY 834 LA SENDA WAY c:HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401021700 6401021800 6401021900 UB LA BENDA WAY 842 LA BENDA WAY 846 LA SENDA WAY CHUI.A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401022000 6401030100 6401030200 850 LA BENDA WAY 845 LA BENDA WAY 841 LA SENDA WAY CHt.1LA VISTA CA 91910 cmn.A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401030300 6401030400 6401030500 837 LA SENDA WAY 833 LA SENDA WAY 633 FORESTER LN CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 6401030500 6401030600 6401030700 RESIDEN'l'* HWJT'AN'I'ON PABLO G&ELENA .. . 82. LA BENDA WY 825 LA BENDA WAY 821 LA BENDA WAY . CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401030800 6401030900 6401031000 . - .-. 618 EAST J 5T 680 EAST J 5T 762 CASSIA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401031000 6401031100 6401031200 RESIDENT- --- .. ...~. .._n. - 682 E J ST 684 EAST J ST 686 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA uno CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6401031300 6401031400 6401040100 . . 688 EAST J ST 690 EAST J ST 673 EAST J ST OIULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 6401040200 6401040300 6401040400 ...-.. - r 6"5 EAST J ST 677 E J ST 679 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 I 6401040500 6401040600 6401040600 SWJT#SHAMAI SARA RESIDENT" 681 E J ST 1938 RUE CHATEAU 683 E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91913 6401040700 6401040800 6401040900 - - - 685 EAST J ST 687 EAST J ST 819 ARROYO PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401041000 6401041100 6401041200 815 ARROYO PL 689 EAST J ST 691 E J ST œtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401041300 6401100100 CITY OF CHULA VISTA - - cia CITY MANAGER POBOX 3304 1224 COAST VILLAGE RD #36 276 FOURTH SANTA BARBARA CA 93108 IBTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91909 6401100100 6401100200 6401100300 RESIDENT- MMJT#SHAHTOUT EMILE I - 842 BUEN TIEMPO DR 846 BllEN TIEMPO DR sse BUER TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA, VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401100400 6401100500 6401100600 -- - 854 BUEN TIEMPO DR 858 BUEN TIEMPO DR 862 BUEN TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401100700 6401100800 6401100900 '- .., - 866 BUEN TIEMPO DR 870 BUER TIEMPO DR 52 HALF MOON BND CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CORONADO CA 92118 6401100900 6401101000 6401101100 RESIDENT· '''TY~ T . --- " 878 SUER TIEMPO DR -"' 3693 FLORISTA ST .74 SUER TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720 6401101100 6401101200 6401101200 ~SIDENT· '._",.,. - . RESIDENT· ..'LÂ"ši:NDA'WY 46 POLK t'T 887 LA SENDA WY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 NEWPORT It! 02840 '-- 64011.01300 6401.101400 6401101500 883 LA. SENDA WAY 879 LA SENDA WAY 867 LA BENDA WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401101600 6401101700 6401101800 863 LA SENDA WAY 859 LA SENDA WAY 851 LA SENDA WAY CHUlA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 64011.01900 6401102000 6401102100 - 854 LA BENDA WAY sse LA SENDA NAY 862 LA BENDA WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401102200 6401102300 6401102400 866 LA BENDA WAY 870 LA BENDA WAY 874 LA BENDA WAY CHUlA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401102500 6401102500 6401102600 RESIDENT· 878 LA SENDA WAY 878 LA BENDA WY 869 aUEN TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJIA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401102700 6401102700 6401102800 RESIDENT* 10 DELTA ST 865 BUEN TIEMPO DR 661 BUEN TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CONCORD CA 94520 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401102900 6401103000 6401103000 - ---- - RESIDENT· BS? BUEN TIEMPO DR POBOX 5669 853 BUEN TIEMPO DR CHtnA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91912 6401103100 6401103200 6401103300 MMJTlMADUENO EDWARD-MMJT#MADUENO IL NSJTlWALDVOOEL ALICE M TR B51 BUEN TIEMPO DR Sf 7 BUEN TIEMPO DR 139 CAMINO ENTRADA CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401103400 6401103500 6401103600 692 EAST J ST 694 EAST J ST . lOBS ilATERVILLE LAKE RD CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91915 ( 6401103600 640110370Q 6401103800 RESIDENT· 696 E J ST 698 EAST J ST 870 ENTRADA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401103900 6401103900 6401104000 FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHORCH OF CH RESIDENT· 915 PASED RANCHERO .7' ENTRADA PL 878 ENTRADA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401104100 6401104200 6401104300 882 ENTRADA PL 88 6 ENTRADA PL 890 ENTRADA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401104900 6401410100 6401410200 - 1 J CITY OF CHULA VISTA - C/O CITY ~ER 882 BUEN TIEMPO DR 886 BUEN TIEMPO DR 276 FOURTH AVE CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401410300 6401410400 6401410500 890 BUEN TIEMPO DR 894 BUEN TIEMPO DR 898 BUEN TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401410600 6401410700 6401410800 902 BVEN TIEMPO DR 996 BUEN TIEMPO DR 901 BUEN TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 . 6401410900 6401411000 6401411100 - 897 BDEN TIEMPO DR 893 BUEN TIEMPO DR 889 BUEN TIEMPO DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401411200 6401411300 6401411400 - ---- 885 BUEN TIEMPO DR 881 BUEN TIEMPO DR 877 BUEN TIEMPO DR CHUl.A VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401411500 6401411600 6401411700 --- - - 873 BUEN TIEMPO DR 713 ANZA WAY 709 ANZA WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ( 6401411800 6401411900 6401412000 - 105 ANZA WAY 101 ANZA WAY 914 CAlM DR CRULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401412100 6401412200 6401412300 - " 918 c:AUotA DR 900 W NINTH ST ROOM 402 209 ELVADO WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 LOS ANGELES CA 90015 SAN DIEGO CA 92114 6401412400 6401412500 6401510100 CITY OF CHULA VISTA . 139 CAMINO ENTRADA C/O CITY MANAG 700 EAST J ST 27S AVE CHULA VISTA CA 91910 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 640151C200 6401510300 6401510400 - ....... ; .. 1- 102 EAST J ST 894 ENTRADA PL 895 ENTRADA PL CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401510500 6401510600 6401510600 .. :~ RESIDENT· 891 ENTRADA PL B 8 '7 ENTRADA PL 887 ENTRADA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401510700 6401510800 6401510900 Ba3 ENTRADA PL B79 ENTRADA PL 87S ENTR1\DA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 œuLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401511000 6401511100 6401511200 4-·· .-.. 871 ENTRADA PI.. 867 ENTRADA PL 708 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401511300 6401511300 6401511400 RESIDENT· 350 SURREY DR 710 E J ST 712 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 CHULA VISTA CA. 91910 6401511600 6401511700 - 716 EAST J ST 7320 75TH PL NE CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 MARYSVILLE WA 98270 - ---~-_..._~~-'" _._~_._- ( 6401511700 640151.1800 6401511900 RESIDENT· 718 E J ST 30 WHEELER 722 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 IRVINE CA 92720 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401512000 6401512100 6401512200 724EJST 900 MESA CT ·904 MESA CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401512300 6401512400 6401512500 - . ...... 908 MESA CT 912 MESA cr 916 MESA CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401512600 6401512600 6401512700 RESIDENT· 4508 BONITA RD 920 MESA CT 45 DORAN CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 BONITA CA 91902 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401512700 6401512800 64D1512900 RESIDENT· - 919 MESA CT 915 MESA CT 911 MESA CT CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401513000 6401513100 6401513200 907 MESA CT 903 MESA CT 463 WESTVIEW DR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401513200 6401513300 6401513400 RESIDENT* 921 LOMA VW 917 LOMA VW 913 LOMA VW CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401513500 6401513600 6401513700 5112 CALLE DE LOS POTROS 905 LeMA VW 901 LeMA VW BONITA CA 91902 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401513800 6401513900 6-401514000 ---- 902 LOMA VW 906 LOMA VW 910 LOMA VW CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ---".-- ( 6401514100 6401514200 6401514300 914 LOMA VW 729 ANZA WAY 72S ANZA WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401514400 6401514500 6401514600 - CITY OF CHULA VIST~ --- 721 ANZA WAY 717 ANZA WAY C/O CITY 276 OICLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 91910 6401520100 6401520200 6401520300 700 ANZA WAY 704 ANZA WAY 708 ANZA WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401520400 6401520500 6401520600 - 712 ANZA WAY 716 ANZA WAY 720 WZA WAY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401520700 6401520800 6401520900 724 ANZA WAY 725 PASEO DEL REY 721 PABEO DEL REY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401521000 6401521100 6401521200 - 8323 YOLO CT 113 PASEO DEL REY 709 PABEO DEL REX SAN DIEGO CA 92129 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6401521300 6401521400 6401521500 - " 705 PABEO DEL REY 701 PASEO DEL REY 925 LOMA VW CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ætJLA VISTA CA 91910 6401521600 6401521700 6402110300 - - T 729 PASEO DEI. REY 733 PASEO DEL REY C/O GOLDEN MANAGEMENT 8641 NAVAJO RD CHt1LA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SAN DIEGO CA 92119 6402110300 6402110400 6402110500 RESIDENT· 766 CASSIA PL 764 CASSIA PL 762 CASSIA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtJLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ! 6402110600 64021107t10 6402110800 760 CASSIA PL 758 CASSIA PL 763 CASSIA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHtn.A VISTA CA 91910 6402110900 6402111000 6402111100 765 CASSIA PL 767 CASSIA PL 612 PORT DUNBAR CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHOLA VISTA CA 91910 OIULA VISTA CA 91913 6402111100 6402111200 6402111300 RESIDENT· UWJTUNTON ELENA A 771 CASSIA PL 655 E J ST POBOX 431258 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SAN DIEGO CA· 92143 6402111300 6402111400 6402111500 . RESIDENT· 657 E J ST C/O CITY 762 CASSIA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 276 AVE VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402111600 6402111700 6402111800 664 1/2 E J ST 664 E J ST 662 EAST J ST POBOX 726 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91912 6402111900 6402112000 6402112100 SWTCttFEJERAN JULIE S 660 EAST J ST 658 E J ST 656 E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402112200 6402112300 6402112400 - U 654 E J ST 652 E J ST 650 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402112500 6402112600 6402120100 :t'70 CASSIA PL 768 CASSIA PL 809 ARROYO PL CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402120200 6402120300 6402120400 .' ....-- . 807 ARROYO PL 805 ARROYO PL 206 W SURSE'!' BLVD CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHCLA VISTA CA 91910 BARRIGADA GU 96913 \ 6402120400 6402120600 RESIDENT· - 800 ARROYO PL 808 ARROYO PL 810 ARROYO PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402120700 6402120800 6402120900 - - 812 ARROYO PL 816 ARROYO PL 820 ARROYO PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402121000 6402121100 6402121200 693 EAST J ST 697 EAST J ST 701 EAST J 5T CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402121300 6402121400 6402130100 703 EAST J ST 705 EAST J ST 707 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402130200 6402130300 6402130400 - -' 709 EAST J ST 711 EAST J ST 404 W BONITA ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SAFFORD AZ 85546 6402130400 640213D500 6402130600 RESIDENT· 713 E J ST 715 EAST J ST 717EJST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402130700 6402130800 6402130900 - '719 EAST J ST 721 EAST J ST 723 EAST J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402131000 6402131100 6402131200 g ..~. ~ 725 EAST J ST 727 EAST J ST 896 MESA PL c:HULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 6402131300 -' 6402131400 6402131500 - ....-. - 892 MESA PL 890 MESA PL 891 MESA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 ____._____.n .. ~_..._ I I 6402131600 6402131700 6402131800 - ._..~ - foMJT#LOPEZ ADOLFO 893 MESA PL B9S MESA PL 891 MESA PL CHULA VISTA CA 91910 æuLA VISTA CA 91910 CHUt.A VISTA CA 91910 6402131900 6402132000 6402132000 RESIDENT'" 899 MESA PL 11022 E FLINTLOCK CT 731 E J ST CHULA VISTA CA 91910 CHULA VISTA CA 91910 SUN tAKES AZ 85248 6402132100 6402132100 'RESIDENTo CITY OF CHULA VISTA 204 KOLA HWY 733 E J ST C/O CITY CHULA VISTA CA 91910 276 PO KULA HI 96790 91910 . " -----. ---.-.----- ~I . '\ . 2 EXlDBITS -/- ~ -.. .-..- --...-------.------..- -..-- TillS PAGE BLANK -~- cJ.2..c,Y6 -:>/2 3 t ·å= 'fl 113 it . . 11- Eo- i~ z r.g ]1 ~ Eo- ~1 I¥ Dj < Õ . ø. C·- .g r.g ~ j~- , Q , I~di ì' ~ " II! z lID C'I_ - i~ 11 z z < ..¡ Q., ! ~ I! tI) e: - .I > Jj ï! < I,.. ..¡ ;::) fa) :c u ¡I= I ..i i il il s .=:J ~8~ ~ ~ -;3....- ____. __d _",""._..._,_,_,,_,_,___.__'_m._ -..- - -- , õ - 0 - ~ õJ!1 50 u m ~ ., Ie .... CI .- :;: s~ EJ I "'- .. 'tJ GI ~III U GI III III ;::= c(0 >.~ _c -;t , Eo I ~~ - I .!GI l ~}. CI- ~ I I CD. -= . I ! = .. me ~~ ' i! ;; , 'gj . e It ~ .. r / ¡¡ . = .. GI Ii .. ÕI ¡jj. J i -lIii; ¡ . ; ~ ~ ~ ~ i tj~ <i & / GI tOe - Ie - i! ¡ :: ! IL,III U OJ en= . as .0 , D. !! ~ () 1 L:.... m E 'C J1 r "7 c ....!! §j ¡f.! ' I !. å I ! I ij J;) I 0 III ] 1! l ! .I: :. en >. , - " f1 ~ /?~/ 'I . J I â~ en IL,~ ï ' & I / ~~ t ~ ~ I I~ I ¡ £ £ I ! ;@ I ! I.J ! EJGJ[~r } J . if' -f; I!J[!J@ ~G·Þ8i J 1-9 _ '-11' - ~. ~ - , ,:,(. ~ ... õ ~l\ . - :....-....:.:. '." . , C'II Q. ° .:' ~~. '::,:':' ".:' ~..~:.::':::...~":'..... .,:\.. ~ -. S +-' U U .- CII en .c 0 ~ .- ...... ~ ..c: , , J: X W . . EJ '. . ...... '. . . I ... .. . ¡¡ I . _ N ¡; \ - ~ . .. ~. \ \. . g:~E C "'00 I.L. ~ 0'" en .. .... o-ECÞOo!S ë°c."", -,g~ClCÞ ,,:,'6>CI.5E D::CÞc"'o U · . . ¡ = ~ . = . . ~I!i ~j --::s.c ã)Z~oc ~¡¡0J:~ CII:;:¡~:>'O . Q.CCÞ=~m I Ii j J 11111111 J ~;t CÞ ~ CI.!! CÞ CI 'C_cu-~ ">"'CIICÞC. -CÞ~c.::JO Lmmm[!][!J[j]ill0D~ I Ci j CD::uencu Iii iii ~ a III IE! ! E I g §j ii;:I:¡ :ø=;:I~;I: .-. CÞ I~¡~~a;aæ~:¡ u ell a~ c. en . ,lHilhlh c CÞ c. 0 . IllaE10000000G i -~- --~. _ _ ---.-.--.-.--...---.......--.. .- ~JI: Þ 0..1 - Sb :E x w EJ , ~ .. ~ i ~ I - I ~ ) iii 0 j ~t ~¡ ¡ ëi~ ~8: I I a ~ ; ! ~ Q! Ii I II 00 OJ f J I I, j j ~ -.. I I I I J J âJ -~- JEJGJ0 100 Ii Ii1 W ¡ ~ ~ ~ Iii !'I- t- ~ ~ ...~ f - - I m - I ~ ~ ::1: >< W ¡¡¡ ... ... '" ~~ i .,; . Ñ ~ è. ~ ~ ~ Q .... ~ .... Ie .,; .... ~ ~ .,; .... I~ ... ~ &! ¡¡¡ ¡ = ~ . ~ ~ Ii ~~ '" <:¡ ... :2'5 ~ ;J ... r-: ... ~ "'~ ! 8 . - ~ .. ~ '" '" ... ;J ~ r-: .... ~ ¡ ~ ... ... ¡¡¡ i i , ~ i '" ~ ~ ~ ~ R s æ æ !.8 Ii! '" '" ~ f ~ Q E: i'.r i'.r i'.r I ~ l~ l~ l~ "'=: ¡ ~ ..... I ....... ~ ~ r!1- ~ ... " II: ! -1- ~ - --.-.-.... -...- -"~-----"-._.._"-.-.-.---- .' . TlDS PAGE BLANK , . - . . , -8'-: EXHIBIT F - .~ .\ . /" :t '._. -t , '- . "'-~" -.. -. "". .9 /'\..~ L ", , I A'" r i',- ... , ... . C) . ..-~~ . ~ '. .. .. .... .- .c .- --- . -. ;¡ .c '" >< " "-; .' ·ì( ~ w 'J , '! " "', ' , .' , f . !. ~ ,. . " . . , ".',': . I ./ :. ! ,( \ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ .¡ .' ~ ¡ ~ .' ~ ij == t:: I ~ ~ . ! f .. "';' ., '1$.. ~~. tf- . .... '. - ;. .~ " ___.__~_'____~'_.m___ . ---~----- - -.--..-- .... -.-.-...-. ...- -- .,. , ~_._. - - \ -¡:. \ . . .... .- , .c ~ .- .c. x w , , , ~ ~ .,. ~ ~ , ., ~ _I I , r ~ , ~ ' I -. '. ~ j & - .. '" j ; .' t: ¡ ~ ';1 -+, ~ I . :.~ ;, -:""""'" ~.. ~ " . .,. ""-ìo ~ .;; .j :'" ) ~ I, \ ~ .!! ~ J2 ,...1.-"" eGG) ".1/ . == CD U /, , ,!'f I . ' en '. I' ',." 1 - ~ ::t!. /~':' i-'~ i ~: ~ ; , -!' ~ - "ø .... .,.' .;1. f CII C~· ('.' I tn CD:' -t:' 1. ,I . ~. o Q. " ..... --' ~ " !' .. i Q.O \ ,'.... ......, 1 o .¡. .. '1 --.' 1£'1'(' 'I,. ", " ~ ,. III .'!,....'.. \;' - -- , ' . , , , . - - N , I .i:'-. :L l~ . - f¡ :~ - - ,.... :·t: . ..... no .- , .c '~. .- :.\\7~ ~ ::-k ¡ .c ~" '.::'1.- ¡ X 'I.~ . ~ "; i: ~~1, Æ, <1 w i '1. ,!II C ¡ilf, '" 'Ii: !Jji 'I" I,,' , C· W, 'II" ,,,, , . 0 ""'-c . ~ ' .; , :. j !: ~ V , ~ ~ ,~ ~ '. , ~ CD ~ :is IV CD ~ CD U I/) IV ::I Q, 1;.:.:.. - ~4:, "rn ~ ¡-.."... . CD C ,..\..:. "- I/) CD ~ p..P,·· '!'. o Q, Q,o ,,><..;.' I' '1',1' e ~ "". . . Q" i:"':'(; >'¿.j ~ >! ];i ~ -. 1;;" . ~ ,~ . .;: ·1 ~ ~ ."~ ! § "I ~ -//- " - . - -- --------- ----- - . TInS PAGE BLANK , . _ /.:1 _ - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AND RESOLUTION -;3_ --- ._- . _____.u. __ TillS PAGE BLANK . - - /tf- Excemt from Unannroved 6/26/96 PI~nninl! Commission Minutes ITEM 1: PUBUC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF THE FOlLOWING APPUCATIONS FILED BY RANCHO DEL REY PARTNERSlßP FOR 156 ACRES LOCATED ON TIlE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST 'H' STREET BETWEEN PASEO RANCHERO AND DEL REY BOULEY ARD WITHIN THE RANCHO DEL REY PLANNED COMMUNITY A. PCM-96-05: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO TIlE RANCHO DEL REY SPA m SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES, AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND WATER CONSERVATION PLAN B. PCS-96-06: TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP FOR 156 ACRES AT TIlE RANCHO DEL REY SPA m, CHULA VISTA TRACT 96-06 Commissioner Davis abstained from this item because of a relationship with McMillin Realty and to avoid any appearance of impropriety. Acting Senior Planner Hernandez presented the staff report, and noted that the SPA amendment was in substantial compliance with the Rancho del Rey Specific Plan and with the small lot development criteria established by the City's Design Manual. Staff recommended approval of the project, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. Commissioner Willett asked if the unresolved issue on Study B superseded Exhibit J. Mr. Hernandez answered negatively. He stated that in the staff report, it had been reported that they had not been able to resolve the design of the area that contained lots 45 to 65, and that they were suggesting an alternative design that was included in the packet. After the reports had been delivered, the applicant had submitted a sketch that was similar to the one staff recommended; therefore, staff was in concurrence with the applicant's sketch and recommended approval of that design. Commissioner Willett, regarding a 4' landscape transition which was to exist between a wall and a fence, asked who would maintain it and how it would be accessed. Mr. Hern~nite7 replied that typically when the wall is to delineate the property line and the landscaping is between the right-of-way and the wall, those lanð"'.aped strips become a part of )~ m~intenance district. Mr. Lee explained that when there is ret~¡ning wall of 4' or 5' in height, and a 5' or 6' high fence is placed on top, it would be a barrier that is out of scale, The applicant had been asked to provide an offset between the retaining wall and the fence itself, so there would be a landscaped break between the two. ~/J"'- ---- -~-_._--~ - -. - PC Minutes -3- June 26, 1996 Commissioner Willett asked if the lO-acre public park had been accepted by the Parks & Recreation Department. Mr. Hernandez stated it had not yet been dedicated to the City, because development had not gone that far. An additional 2 acres would be provided either by paying the fees or adding additional amenities to the park. Mr. Lee noted that as the subdivision activity progressed in the area, the public facilities document controlled the timing in ter,ms of dedication and construction. Commissioner Willett questioned the impact on the elementary school. He asked if some of the students would be going to Chula Vista Hills. Environmental Review Coordinator Reid stated that the response received from the Chula Vista Elementary School District indicated that it was.in a community facilities district and Rancho del Rey would be required to pay the annual fee. The District could serve the property with existing proposed sites. They did not specify which school the children would be utilizing. Commissioner Willett noted that most of them would probably go to Chula Vista Hills, which was already above maximum. Mr. Reid stated it would be the District's decision as to where the children would go. Commissioner Ray asked why a retirement community could not exist there. Why was it too small? Who was contacted as to why the parcel would not work as a retirement community. He asked for some background from staff. Mr. Hernandez deferred the question to the applicant who did the research. He felt it had to do with the Fair Housing Act. Commissioner Ray asked if there would have to be a parcel somewhere else, to provide a facility the City had envisioned would have been on this parcel. Mr. Lee stated that there had been some initial discussion on several of the villages in Otay Ranch as potentially offering a chance for that to occur. The applicant had contacted a number of the firms that build these types of facilities in an attempt to entice one to come to this particular site. Because of the size and configuration, it did not work, There were opportunities within Otay Ranch because of the land available and the size, or possibly the next phase of EastLake, Commissioner Ray questioned whether there was a requirement for the City to dedicate a portion of land for a facility such as this, or is this strictly up to the developer or the builder. Is there some state or federal mandate. -/6_ - -.- PC Minutes -4- June 26, 1996 Mr. Lee stated that was not a mandate. The City tried to provide a mixture of housing, and expected those to occur in the new communities. Commissioner Ray asked if it was economy driven. Mr. Lee concurred. Chair ~chscher noted there was a significant difference in assisted living or congregate care and what was envisioned as a specialty housing project for retirees. It was a focused marketing effort. Commissioner Tarantino noted that a retirement community would necessitate single-story as opposed to two-story. If so, it would need a bigger footprint and, therefore, more area. He commended McMillin for the trail system and open space. Commissioner Willett, referring to the conditions of approval, asked if there was a setback from East "H" Street of 80 feet. Mr. Hernandez expl~ined that the 10' separation was from the face of curb of East "H" Street. The 40' is the minimum width of the 80' strip of landscape. Both sides of the trail would be landscaped. This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. Donna Mallen, 693 East "J" Street, CV, lived above the site. She did not oppose the project, but wanted the natural vegetation preserved as much as possible, and hoped there would be less grading on the site. She was also concerned about how the City preserved the open space. She wanted to see more responsible follow-through. Assistant Planning Director Lee indicated a fence and trail system located along the boundary which was the trail system. All of the natural area south of that would remain. Development is north of that area. The applicant would provide a connecting trail system along "H" back to Paseo and the existing trail, plus continuing the trail to the west. Nora Forrest, 957 Chestnut Court, CV, was opposed to the single-family dwellings instead of the senior housing community. Thought it would bring their property value down. Bill Torre, 963 Chestnut Court, CV, felt there was very little concern for the homeowners; more concerned with the tax revenue. It appeared to him that the homes would be low-cost homes which would reduce the values of the existing homes. He felt the existing homeowners should be considered. He didn't understand why it was too small an area for senior housing. Thought it was economy-driven; concerned about the noise from "H" Street and impact on Chula Vista Hills Elementary School. The school is already crowded and they are trying to add two more trailers to accommodate students, Staff had stated there was no requirement for mixed land use, but Mr. Torre thought it should be considered. He asked if the SDG&E easeJnent was being used for some of the environmental mitigation or if other land was being provided. -/1- -.~~..__..._._---- PC Minutes -5- June 26, 1996 Mr. Hernandez stated the SDG&E easement was not being used for environmental mitigation. Other land was being provided. Environmental Review Coordinator Reid stated that when the project was originally approved, 360 acres were purchased by McMillin in O'Neill Canyon south of the Otay Valley area to mitigate for the . impacts by this project. Craig Fukuyama, 2727 Hoover Avenue, NC, representing McMillin Co=unity and Rancho del Rey investors of the property, stated that other than one multi-family site, this would be the last tentative tract map in Rancho del Rey. In response to one of the speakers, he stated that the grading that had occurred to date was about 50% of the grading that would take place in the area. All the current vegetation would remain; there would not be any further native vegetation removed. The restoration and revegetation work that they had undertaken needed to germinate with natural rainfall. The Federal Government gave a minimum of 5 years to restore and complete the requirements of the permits. Mr. Fukuyama gave the reasons why senior housing would not be built, including the size of the property, which could not fmancially handle all the amenities that were required. All the builders contacted had rejected the proposal. Mr. Fukuyama stated they had no issue with staff's reco=endation and requested approval by the Planning Commission. Answering Co=issioner Willett, Mr. Fukuyama stated the future middle school would be located off "J" Street and Pasco Ranchero next to the co=unity park. It would be a joint use facility with the school and the park. A joint use agreement was being negotiated. They would begin construction of the park January 1997, as well as the school. Both facilities would be open for use in September 1998. When the school was ready for use, the park would be ready for use.. The park would sit for a year to allow the grass to mature. Commissioner Willett asked if this was in keeping with the City ànd School agreement of shared facilities--the shared parking that was agreed to. Mr. Fukuyama answered affirmatively. Mr. Fukuyama noted there would be a trail from Pasco Ranchero accessing the park, as well. Regarding the type of housing, Commissioner Willett asked if Mr. Fukuyama would give him the sizes of the houses. Mr. Fukuyama explained the different products and their sizes and comparable projects. Commissioner Willett asked if the SDGE&E power line easement would be leveled and replanted as open space. Mr. Fukuyama stated they were proposing to install an open space area under the easement of approximately 1 acre. SDG&E. however, has stated that they may wish to install other facilities in their easement. SDG&E has approved in concept a I-acre grassed turfed area with picnic tables and benches for children to play. There would, however, be no play equipment, and would be maintained by the open space maintenance district. -/R- PC Minutes -6- June 26, 1996 Commissioner Tarantino thought there may be some turf and possibly a jogging trail, as in the Sunbow park. Mr. Tarantino concurred, although he believed it would not be quite as flat and would be more rolling rather than flat. Commissioner Thomas asked ü there was a la-acre park and a 2-acre park. Mr. Fukuyama stated the la-acre park would be next to the school and would be known as Voyager Park. The other park is on the SDG&E easement and was not included in the acreage. It did not count as park credit. Chair Tuchscher asked the square footage of the R7C lots. Mr. Fukuyama stated they were 55 x 70 pad. The average lot size was over 5,000 sq. ft, Answering Mr. Tuchscher, Mr. Fukuyama stated the average lot size in R7A 5,400 sq. ft. and on the duplex, the average lot would be 3,700 sq. ft. Answering Commissioner Thomas, Mr. Fukuyama explained how the duplexes would look and the location of the garages and the sound wall, noting the garages separated the two units. No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed, Commissioner Thomas asked Mr. Willett the capacity of the Discovery School and how close it was to the maximum. Commissioner Willett stated that all the new schools used the same plot plan and accommodated from 670 to 700 students. Commissioner Thomas noted that Chula Vista Hills was 100 children under maximum and questioned the enrollment at Discovery. Mr. Willett believed Discovery to be at the maximum, but noted they were transferring in from other areas. He asked Mr. Fukuyama when the houses in Rancho del Rey would be completed. Mr. Fukuyama explained that houses were currently being constructed. Chula Vista Hills, Clearview, and Discovery Elementary Schools served Rancho del Rey. In talking with the District, they were adjusting their boundaries in anticipation of Rancho del Rey as well as other enrollments being generated for the schools. The District seemed to feel confident they would be able to manage the growth being anticipated. Commissioner Thomas questioned Mr. Fukuyama as to the number he anticipated enrolling in the elementary schools. Mr. Fukuyama stated that the District used 1.2 or 1.3 as a generation factor, so with 400 units there should be approximately 450 students for the elementary school. Mr. Lee stated he recalled that the Elementary District used approximately .6, or approximately 240 students at build-out at the Elementary District. The middle school and high school were approximately .3. Both factors added together totaled close to 1.3. -/9- ~..- - .-- .. -_.__._.._-,.._,,~-"_._. -----...--- PC Minutes -7- June 26, 1996 MS (ThomaslWillett) to accept staf'f's proposal. Commissioner Ray asked where the open space was proposed. Aside from trying to maintain a continuity for the open space and a greenbelt, were the areas selected based on topography or other factors other than maintaining the continuity. Mr. Fukuyama stated the when the specific plan was originally conceived the intent was to maintain the canyons and open space. Because of the habitat preservation criteria, an agreement was negotiated with USF&WS for off-site mitigation, They had purchased 350 acres in Otay Mesa which had been determined to be of greater or equal biological value by the USF&WS, which the applicant had bought. They in turn had been allowed to develop portions of Rancho del Rey and maintain parts of the open space system currently designed there, rehabilitate and revegetate, and manage it for the long- term preservation of other plants and species including the gnatcatcher, cactus wren, etc. that currently reside in those areas. The selection then was based on amenity, environmental, and the land plan. VOTE: 5-0-1 (Salas absent; Davis abstaining) Commissioner Davis rejoined the meeting at 8:20 p.m. . - -h- - RESOLUTION NO. PCS-96-06/PCM-96-05 RESOLUTION OF 1HE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TIlAT 1HE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE TIlE 1ENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PARCEL R-7, CHULA VISTA TRACf 96-06, RANCHO DEL REY SPA ill; AND AMENDMENTS TO 1HE RANCHO DEL REY SPA m SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PLANNED COMMUNITY DlSTRICf REGUlATIONS, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES, WA1ER CONSERVATION PLAN AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND ADOPT ADDENDUM TO FEIR-89-10 WHEREAS, duly verified applications for a SPA amendment and tentative subdivision map was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on March 8, 1996 by the Rancho Del Rey Partnership LP; and, WHEREAS, said applications requests approval to subdivide Parcel,R-7, Chula Vista Tract 96-06, Rancho Del Rey SPA ill, and amend the Rancho Del Rey SPA ill Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, General Development Plan, Planned Community District Regulations, Residential Design Guidelines, water Conservation Plan, and Air Quality Improvement Plan; and, WHEREAS, the tentative subdivision project consists of 156 acres located on the south side of East "H" Street between Paseo Ranchero and Del Rey Boulevard, and the proposal is to subdivide the property into 403 single family detached and 11 open space lots along with all on site and off site associated public and private improvements; and, WHEREAS, the SPA amendment application requested to change the text, statistical tables, and land use designation of 86 acres in the Rancho Del Rey SPA ill Parcel R-7 located on ihe south side of East "H" Street between Paseo Del Rey and Paseo Ranchero. The requested changes include: 1) a change in land use designation from Specialty Housing (SH) to Single Family Detached-Cottages SFS, and Single Family Attached- Duplex! Townhomes,2) a reduction in density from 6.7 to 6.5, and the permitted number of units from 588 to 520 (-68), and 3) a reduction in the overall SPA permitted number of units from 1,380 to 1312 (-68); and, WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new supplemental EIR is necessaI)' and has prepared an addendum to EIR 89-10, Rancho Del Rey SPA ill, which must be considered and adopted by the City Council prior to a decision on the project; and, - WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on the tentative map and SPA amendment and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and it mailing - -9-1- --,-,...._~~..".._~_._"-,,.- - to property owners and tenants within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and, . WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 . p.m., June 26, 1996, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered and recommends adoption of the proposed addendum to the EIR-89-10, NOW, TIlEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED TIIAT TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution! Ordinance in the forms attached with said minor modifications as may be approved by the City Attorney adopting the addendum to FEI-89-10, approving the Tentative Subdivision Map for Chula Vista Tract 96-06 and SPA amendments in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. BE IT FUR TIlER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TIlE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 26th day of June, 1996, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Commissioners Ray, Tarantino, Thomas, Tuchscher, Willett NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Salas (conflict of interest) ABSTAIN: Commissioner Davis William C. Tuchscher II, Chair ATIEST: Nancy Ripley, Secretary m:/bomeIp1.nn;nglluislpcs9606.pcr -;1)..- . . ADDENDUM TO FErn-S9-10 -~3- --~-- . ----- -.- - -..- TInS PAGE BLANK , . - ." - ,71./ - - - ( ADDENDUM TO RANCHO del REY SPA m EIR (89-10) PROJECT NAME: Rancho del Rey SPA ill Sectional Planning Area AmendmentIParcel R-' Tentative Map PROJECT LOCATION: South side of East "II" Street between Paseo del Rey and Paseo Ranchero. PROJECT APPLICANT: McMillan Project Servk:es, IDe. for RaDello del Rey IDveston, LP. PROJECT AGENT: Cinti Land Planning CASE NO.: IS-96-06 DATE: June 13, 1996 I. INTRODUCTION (a) When an EIR has been certified or a Negative Declaration adopted for a project, no subsec:juent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: J. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant ( environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undenaken which will require major revisions of the previous 'EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted. (b) If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a Negative Declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR ifrequired IDIcIer subsection (a). Otherwise the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent Negative Declaration, an addendum, or no fùrther documentation. 'Ibis addendum has been prepared in order to provide additional information and analysis concerning public service impacts as a resuh of the applicants decision to change the project description. As a result of this analysis, the basic conclusions of the FEIR·I9-10 have not changed. Environmental impacts are ~ fOlDld to be less than significant for the proposed project. . (" Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared the following addendum to EIR (19-10). - ,;LJ-: -_..- - ( n. PROJECT SETl'ING Parcel R-7 is the residential development parcel along the south of East "H" Street between Paseo Ranchero to the east and Paseo del Rey to the west. The parcel encompasses ISS.94 acres. The site is currently undeveloped. Zoning on-site is PC (planned Comnllmity). Surrounding land uses include: commen:ial to the north, the south leg of Rice Canyon to the south, singl~-family residential to the east along with open space and single-family residential to the west. The average slope of the site is I S% and the maximum slope of the site is 200A.. m. PROJECT DESCRIFJ'ION The proposed project is a SPA Plan A""""'mf!Dt aDd Tentative Tract Map for the subdivision of Parcel R-7 in SPA m of Rancho del Rey. The proposed I8Dd use designation is ·SFS" (single-family detached-cottages) and ·SFA" (Single-Family Attached-ToWnhomes) and will include: single-family detached, single-family attached and open space. SPA level densities allow for S20 dwelling units, maximum. This project initially proposed S88 units of senior housing, however, the Tentative Map now proposes 403 dwelling units (283 single-family detached and 120 single-family attached) on ISS.94 acres. The entire Rancho del Rey project is within Mello-Roos C(llTlmnnity Facilities District No.3. The property will be assessed a special tax to fully mitigate impacts on Elementary /High school facilities. A site specific Soils Study will be required prior to the issuance of grading ( and/or building permits. A traffic analysis was prepared for the project site, This study concluded that although there would be a net decrease in dwelling units, there will be a net increase in traffic generated (from 10,110 to 12,106 daily trips). However, the study found that the tyroPOsed I8Dd use modifications will not cause AM or PM levels of service (LOS) to c:hange at any intersections relevant to the project. Section vm.3 of the Rancho del Rey SPA m Sectional p¡_nni"l Area Plan A""""'""'1It Draft states that mlximum permissible interior noise levels are not to exceed SS dbA between 7 a.m.-IO p.m. and 4S dbA between 10 p.m.-7 a.m. To assure compliance, a noise study was prepared for the project site, This study concluded that mitigation of first-floor noise impacts can be achieved through the construction of a bmier (wall or berm or combination thereof). However, second-floor receivers CCJUld be ~ to noise levels in excess of City staDdards. Special building materials will be required to mitigate noise levels on the second floor. This is also a requirement of die SPA Regulations. The discretionæy actions include: approval of a Tentative Map aDd a SPA .................~ as well as approval by die Design Review Cnmmi-e, . . .. ( ~dJ;- ( IV. CONCLUSION . Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines IIId based upon the above discussion, I hereby fmd that the project revisions to the proposed project will result in only minor technical chaDges or additions which are DeCeSsary to make the FEIR-89-10 adequate UDder .CEQA. ~~~ ENVIRO NT RE W RDINATOR REFERENCES General Plan, City of Chula Vista Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code City of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures Final Rancho del Rey SPA m Traffic Analysis (BRW. Inc. January. 1996) Noise Technical Report for the Portions of Rancho del Rey SPA m (RECON, February 12, 1996) ( . ( -.;2 ? - ."'_.._--_._~_._~--_._._-_.. - .----- --.- ----. - - -_._"- ~. ---_.~- . THIS PAGE BLANK 0 - -).8_ , " I( . IXECUDYE SUMIIAIlY : I TbI. document II a Supplemental E1IvIronrnental Impact Report C$EIR) which adchIMI the.prapa..d Rancho del Ray Sectional'JannIn¡ Area CSPA)Œ project. ThII SE1R Ihould be ....d In amJuncdon "lth the prev10ualy ....pIRd Pinal" DR I þ-I).2). Th. project applicant, Rancho del Rey 'artn.nh1p, II propolln¡ .ve1opment of the third phue CSPA m) of the m Rancho del R.y SpecifIc 'Jane I The fIr.t and ..cond phue of the project, SPA I arid SPA D, are clWrently under conavUâlon. I . . The E1 Rancho del Rey SpeeWc Plan ..... .ncompaue. apprOximately 2,"0 acre. ( located eat of Interatate ao" lOuth and wat of Otay LaIcu Road, and north of . T.IIsraph Canyon Road In the City of Chula VlIta. SPA µJ conallu"of a dftalled plan for realdentl.1 development, community f.cWtle., and park and open apace f I uae. on approxIm.tely .0' .cres loc.ted lOutheat of Ean H Sveet and north of \ T.lesr.ph Canyon Road. The SPA UI Plan 11 In conformance wIth the overall . lpeclOc pl.n. Included within the provlalona of the !1 Rancho del Rey SpeeWc " \( , Plan 11 . mechanllm t.o U'anlfer denalty from OIle cawF!')' to another.. apll't of , the SPA Pl.n .pproval proce... The d.nalty U'anlfer "W Involve the tranafer of ~ I 171 realdentlal unltl within the SPA m pr~Ject ...... Th. approval of SPA 81 wil i Include the SPA m Plan, a wntatlve map, a 'ubUc PacWtla PJnanclna 'lan, Deall" Gulde11ne., . Development A¡reement, and a SpecifIc .lan Amendm.nt for denalty v.lllfe,. .nd park acre..e adcl1t1ona. The e11~tlon of the Ean 3 SU'IIt [ Unk coMeàlns Pueo Ranchero and Buena YlIta wil requlr' a Specific '.n and General Pl.n Amendment. r U03ECT DUS!YfTlON t Thll1anc:ho del R.y SPA m 'lan propa... the connrudlon of I,saO 11n¡1e-famUy I clwe11ln¡ unit. (DU) ran¡1ns In denalty from from J.I to 10.6 DUlac on el¡I\t naldentlal. ~ on approximately 206 acru. Jnc1uded amon¡ the p1amed . I' dwe11lna unlU .... 'I) DUI. of ~1.lty houa1n¡ on approximately.' acrtI ~ a .. tinia11 retirement community which wW lie compoaed of cletachecl and attached \ hoUllna. In .ddltion, a Junlor blah school site totalUna 2..7 acru, a ne1&hborhoocl -,)9 - . ~.-.-...--_._-'~-_._.__._-,.,. - . -- - .. -... .. -_. . . ( Summary of Findings . . TIle pIOpOIed RlDcbo delRey ~0DIl Plunl", Area (SPA) m "-""em. located wi1IIJD die ell)' of Qula VJata. would be Iffec:ted by II'If6c DOlle OD Eut B S1rIeL 'DIe aty of CwJa Villa.. DOlle IIIDcIardI lie 65 -"'111II1)' DOlle IIQ1IIVIJeat Ine1 (CNEL) for a1aior JUideødIJ lIeU and 45 CNEL for DOJ---sidve ht~or IOGIIIL . TIle tntf'1C em Eut B S1reet could pIIeIlSe DOlle Jeû It JI'OIIDd-Ine1 -.tttve ncepto..OJI I limited portioa of die SPA plan M,I-ðme:nt project lite paIIt dIaD 65 CNEL. Which II die Cit)"a exterior 1IIDdud. 'Jbeae ImpICII wouJd be ..u......~ w1tb die construction of I twrier It die Idle of die Iota adjacent to die roadway. 1bere II tile potenlill tbat Jec:ond·lIoor atedor seœpto..cou1d be -."*41 to Doiae IeveJs in ucess of tile Cit)"'IIIDdud. Mitipdon of _ poIeDliIl ImpICII would be achieved IbroUlh die use of proper COIIIInICdon ......."Iquea which euare adec¡uase .....",.,.,Iufon loss for Jntedor receiveø. Introduction ( i TIle proposed Rancho del Rey SPA m Amenclmeøt II Jocated cut of die ........- ction of Eut H Street and Pueo Ranchero. IIetweeø Paleo P·"Chero and Paleo del Re)' ill 'die ell)' of Chula Vista. Pi¡me I Ibowadle project YlciDiI)' 1IIIp. FJ¡area 21. 2b, aDd 3 present die proposed lot COJIf1¡uratioa for die ... IIUIce:nt to Ibe road.....y. 1be eutallmost portion of tile project will be ~T·~ m1lld·flmDy......."tI.1 ne aldmate confJ¡W'ldon of tbJs portion of die project 11 Itillllllder CCIIIIideradoa. TIle project --'Rtf of an IIP-ðme:nt to Ibe sPA plan for PMICbo del Rey. C'hMIJI",dIe .·""·"d !lie from mor JaouaIøa to IiD¡Je-fImDy and mlllti.fImDy 1IUI"-tI.1 'JbIa æpon analyzeadle impICII to die popoaed lIUI"-daJlota from faIare tIIf6c DOlle pœrared OIl Eut H StreeL Impacll lie ,.-.~ JD accanIuce w1tb Ibe .......11_... poll... and ltanclardl atlb".....4 by Ibe aty of CwJa VIata. u.._ _ .~lDeøded to reduce IIpIftcant ImpICII to Do''f-' - dtlve lIeU. .' :..00'. . - . , . . . . ,1 ,\ . '. ( .".. - -3ð - ;...... . -"-,------ . ( EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpoH of the Rancho Del Ray SPA III Tdc Analysis Is to evaluate the Impact of a propoaed land. use change within the entire SPA III area. SpIcIficaIly. the ltudy . 1ocuI1I on a new land use proposal for the parcel _rred to II Parcel R-7, which II IocaWd aouth of East H Ibeet and welt of Paleo Ranchero within the Rancho Del Ray SPA boundaries. The proposed change from the qlnally approved development (refened to .. the Base Condition) InvoIveI the elimination of 588 unIII of..nIor houIIng and their replacement by 285 eddltlonalllngle family detached homes and 224 atlached unIta. for a net decrea.1 .of 78 dwelling units. However, the higher trip gen..¿n rates of non aenlor housing wID cause an Incru.. of epproxlmately 1.. In the overaD number of dally trlpl generated by Rancho Del Ray SPA III. tom 10.110 to 12,108 trIpa pardI)'. ' Background (non-alte-generated) trip levels and Intaructlon turning movements were estimated from projections In the OIay Rench SPA One TtansporœtJon Study and the OIay Ranch SPA One PhasIng Analysis. with appropriate lubtractlonl made to account for the 101I of senior housing, New trips due to the additionai lingle ~mlly and attached housing units were then genereted, diltrlbuted and IIIlgned to one of three aeee.. polnta located to the east (on Pallo Ranchero) and to the north (at the H StreetITIerra Del Ray Intersection). The Ilgnallzed Intersections operations analysis technique from the 1894 Highway Capacity Manualwas UMd to estimate Vear 2000 and Vear 2010 NA «( and PM peak hour Inte....ction levels of ..NIce with and without the proposed R-71and . USI changes. Four key Interaectlons (H Street at Pallo Del Ray. TIerra Del Ray and PallO Ranchero; and PallO Ranchero at Telegraph Canyon Road) were evaluated for this atudy. The Study found that the proposed land UN modifications wID not cause any change In either NA or PM levels of ..NIce at any of the four Itudy lråraectlonl: nor wID they result In any significant change In the rJerage peak hour delay experlenoed by motorlata. . ThIs finding applies equally to near·tenn (Year 2000) and Iong-tenn (Year 2010) conditions. However. the project will ...uIt In a modest Incrull In overall dally trip levels. which the City of Chula VIsta lhould consider In the light of the many other proposed development changes that could generate additional trips and potentially ...ult In cumulative Impacts within the H Street Contdor east of Iì..... 805 (1-805). : I . . , ... . . :. . . . . ( .<:,.00.... ~ ,..y' ,.' . -3/- ,....dIO"""" ,I Mw. Inc. . 0; ... -.- , aPA II' TIIfIJø AMIYØ i# . -... ----- .- .,- ....-.---.-- -.- - . TInS PAGE BLANK . . - _ 3.;1..- PUBLIC INPUT - 33- ._-~-_..._-..._- --_._--~.- .'.- - , TIllS PAGE BLANK . , . --- ??-- - . - . r_ at· .....-.. --":: . ..... , NARO (J ...._ ~ JIarOh 4, litIS .:.....,. $)' " ID:. .1111_ V. '4ón. ..3 Cbutmlt ct. ... ,. ebula Vl81:&, ca. .1110 ID:. llart:in IUller &..ociat. Planner, City of Cbula Vb1:& planning Depar.t:aent 271 Fourth Ave. Cbula Vb1:&, CA. 11110 . Dear 1Ir. Kill.r ea.. Ro.. pcø-..-O' aDd 1'-"-0' .ab'.ct: ~·e. ð~ ..vi.ad Pro~ . I .. very conc.rn.d about tha pror;.al by:..eH1ÍÍin Projact luvl0.. to ..and th. Rancho dal R.y ..ac fie Planning Araa (SPA) III Plan. !rh. propo.a4 chang. of parcal R-' ~roa .ardor bouaing to ..... conventional at1:&ch.4 and d.1:&chad bouaing producta i. un- .' acoaptabla. It ia obvloua what KcMill1n baa lleen doing, and vbat .... th.y plan to bar.· afaln. !rh.y wer. orlg1DallY 00IIII1t1:&4 to building .enior boo ng of an up-.cal. utur., DOW tbay ere . pr:t:a1ng to in.tall c:b.ap at1:&cha4 and unat1:&che4 hoM. to ax b. their profita, at our dateraent. !rh... boo.. will drive th. aark.t value of our bOlD.. down even aor.. ftey will build tba.. c:b.aply built boa.. and offer tbem in 110,000'., or ..yba .v.n lower. W. bav. ..en what tbay bav. done h tb. Itaftobo Del by Developmant, fir.t thay COIDa in .aking proai... of building ",aUty bOlD.. at aark.t pric.. then th.y nitch and r:: in abnp bOlD.. and driv. down th. aarkat price. of .very exi.t boa. owner aroun4. ftay don't cara, .. lone¡ a. th.!. aü. th.ir buoJc and V.t out. ft. pr:..d obang. to R-' is _a4 ately 1lab1n4 way hou.. and will bav. a .ct !apact, ~1nanolally, env1rCmaen1:&lly, and ...theUcally. Whan I bougbt tb. ........er Ridg. boaa h 111. (12 yåan ago), I ... told thet tha Itaftobo Del by lNsina.. oent:er would _ en office. type oenter ( I lleU.ve if you look Oft th. ..11 of 7ODZ' ~&ftfting nception ar.a the original ... Þ .Ull tbere). IUtead order to ......~.h. profita and aak. . f¡U1oJc ..1. tbay ob.~it to n1:&l1. .ow we bave . Boa. Depot, a Cbevron va.oliDe .1:&UOD, . IIowl~ alley, ..ytag, Cb111i'., Þart, Prioe Club and· ¥bol. .1_ , , r of add tioul ntal1.etorea. _ain ita tba old llait and nitch, # atuact r:OP1. in vet tbem to I:Iuy and tall tbea one '.h,C,., and than CIbaftg. t and aot can vbat ·the ocmaequenoe. ere to tb8 tben .... existing bCIIae owner.. .. an v.tUq ~e4 of ita ,.-..... I tboqbt tb. oity ".-þJ\'o." to lie protaot1n; tb8 o1Uaana, or , - .3 J- . . . -. . ( 18 ~e need ror t:ax revenue out weighing ~e intere.u of iu citbena. We are· getting hit hard, ~ey are overbuilding and driving aarket price. down. I eü ~.t you aake ~_ .tick ~ ~e1r plan.. And ~t you keep u. inroraed .. ~ what ~o.e plana are and ~.t . rorum be held for ua to voice our op1n1ona prior ~ approval of any app11cation on t:h1. and any other ahange. that ~ey ..y be propoaing. . . With aegarda,. ?i~~ ?ØúL Wil11_ V. !'one ce: Barbara add Summer It1dge Homeowner. ( . - . - . ( _ 36- , DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - $1- . - - ~- - --_. . . . . 1HB ~ Y OP.aM.A mA DJSa..OSuu~.l'I'BMBNT ~ 11 Ire required 10 lie I SlalcmeDI' or DiIcIoIure 01 GCnaIa OWIIaIblp or lullClll ......... )18)1111'" or ..palp ('. ..,lbullollS, 01 III_lien wIIlcII will require clllcrctloDlty action on tile pan or 11I1 City CouIIcII, ,......,1\1 n-......ioa, lid -.d Oilier oIDcIaJ IIodJeL 'he followln.laro....tIoa .USIIIe 4IiJc:Iofcd: . . I. Ust IIIc -- or IU pcnou UYIa. I """nelal "1.,.1 III tile propln) wlllclllI tile IUbjIc:I or.... appUcatloa or tile ..ana, ..... OWDer, Ipplleu\, CDIIIICIOI,IIIbcDIU'ICIOr, ..terlallllppUer. ' . 'RANCHO DEL REY INVESTORS. L.P. . A CALIFORNIA' LIMITED PARTNERSHIP . ''1 UIIIJ pcnoa" JdeAllllcd punUlnt to (I) IbcM II I CDrporallol Of panaenblp.lllt tile __ orlllllldMduala OWIIID. ... IIIaa 10.. or 11I1 alia,. II 11I1 CDrporatlol or OWIIin'lIIJ panlllllblp "1IraI1 ..ilia pIft\IIIIJIIp. . TRIDlNT USA. INC. McMILLIN-RDR. INC. 3- ., I.., penon" Jelenllllld punUlnl 10 (I) IbcM II BOn.proDI orplllallon or I trill\, lilt 11II .... or IIIJ petIOlI lIMa. . dIrKIor or tile DOn·proDI orplllallon or .. U'llltII or IIcnellclaty or U'IIItOf or IIIc trIIIL \ ( RIA ... Haw JOu MellIOre lllan S250 wonll or bus.... trlDllelld wlllIlIIJ -.ember or tile Qty IUIt IoInIa, iI'!Mot......1ou, O""...'t~ IIUI Coundl wltbln tile pullMM IIOnllls' Y__ No..!....,,.,,..... .........tl pIIIOa(I): . . S. ,..... JdeAIIfy eacII ind IVety perIOl, IIIcIUCS",lny ...n... "p~ CDUIlItu... or "4I.,.01.lt _tracton wIIo JOu ~ ..Iped 10 ..pracll JOu Wore tile City .. \ilia ..tter. M{, 'ý ~ ;,4-, . Crall ,. FukuJaJDa 'boil Fuller . k.,,",.th IblnMIPII"'!':."." · 6. Haw JOIII\Id1or JOUr oØlœra or Ipn... .. tile IlI"pte, CDIItrlllutad MIl IIIaa SI,GOO 10 I 0Mt,...,-.... .. tile .nat or pi "'" .... perIocI'Y__ No.J. .,,.,.... wIIIcII -"--"IIer(I): , · . · · · · (NO'IB: ..- .-....111011II1 .... { I: 9/12/95 ofCDIIIIICICIr/IppIIc . - 31-- PriIIt or '" .... of CDIItrlClDrlqpUcaii · ~"'*"'-I- .....~...._, ......~~ ;.;....tIM&ft--.,.ÌMít!lll.6ØðIIJØtA.....",.~·_ w .-d._ __...,..,.,.~_ COUNCXL AGENDA STATEMENT ~ xtem4-!/' / Meeting Date ~ ~ 7/;?)Jt XTEM TXTLE: Public Hearing on Adoption of the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee Ordinance e:<¡' ?"-lstablishing the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee in accordance with Resolution 18288, which established the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program ¿' SUBMITTED BY: Deputy city Manager Thomson JI Finance Director ~ REVXEWED BY: City Manager~~ (4/5ths vote: Yes_ No-X-) At its May 14, 1996 meeting, the city council adopted Resolution 18288 which established the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program. As established by that Resolution, the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program has two components: (a) a Reserve Fund fee, to be paid by the developer/applicant, adopted by ordinance by the City council, and (b) the otay Ranch Property Tax Transfer Agreement between the city of Chula vista and the County of San Diego. The Property Tax Transfer Agreement was approved by the city council on May 14, 1996 and by the County Board of Supervisors on May 15, 1996. In adopting the Property Tax Transfer Agreement and establishing the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program on May 14, 1996, the city council also directed staff to schedule a public hearing to establish the fee for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program. This public hearing and the proposed ordinance are thus for the City council to consider establishing the fee for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program. RECOMMENDATXON: That council: 1. Conduct the public hearing on the adoption of the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund fee, and 2. Place the ordinance establishing the otay Ranch Reserve Fund fee on the first reading. BOARD/COMMXSSXON RECOMMENDATXON: N/A DXSCUSSION: The otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), approved by the Chula vista city Council and Board of supervisors on october 28, //.)-/ ) _ .-- .-._._~_.. _._..~ ....-....... --~_.- -" - - --j..--..-...-----...- ---..--- ...Un. Dete "'r" 7(11-/91, Page 2 1993, included the following policy on page 264 of the GDP: "All city local services provided to the incorporated portions of otay Ranch, including direct and indirect costs, and including capital and operating costs, shall be covered by project revenues and project exactions. Shortfalls shall be covered through a specially designated fund established by the developer and through an agreement between the City of Chula vista and the county of San Diego. Capital costs for regional facilities shall also be covered by the project revenues... n The otay Ranch GDP also includes an Implementation Measure on page 265 that states: "A reserve fund program shall be established concurrent with the approval of the first SPA, to correct any annual operating deficiencies incurred by the applicable jurisdiction. The reserve fund program shall finance the cost of an annual review and updated fiscal impact analysis, and be the basis for any transfer of monies from the reserve fund... n The Property Tax Transfer Agreement previously approved by the City Council and the County Board of Supervisors for otay Ranch, calls for the city and county to jointly undertake an annual fiscal impact analysis of the project area for twenty years commencing with FY 1997-98 using the Fiscal Impact of New Development (FIND) Model. The Property Tax Agreement also requires the county to utilize a portion of its annual fiscal surplus to offset any residual operating deficits incurred by the City through FY 2016- 17, subject to specified constraints. The otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program, as adopted by the city Council in Resolution 18288 on May 14, 1996, specifies that the Reserve Fund Program shall consist of the following: a. The developer and/or applicant shall pay a fee, adopted by ordinance by the City council, to pay for the financing of the cost of an annual review and an updated fiscal impact analysis, as performed by the Fiscal Impact of New Development (FIND) Model. The FIND Model produces a representation of city and County fiscal impacts for any given year and throughout the otay Ranch Project's build out period. b. The otay Ranch Property Tax Transfer Agreement, entered into with the County by Resolution #18261, wherein the county has agreed to cover, subject to a number of contingencies, the potential City operating deficits from the otay Ranch Project that the City might incur through FY 2016-17. Resolution #18288 also indicates that the -city council may amend 1I.¡-ë7- , +-......-.-- -.--..-"-"-.---._._~-- "-'" ~.._',._._----_.__.__.__._"" Meeting Date the Reserve Fund Program, from time to time, to include additional fees to cover any potential city operating deficits that may not be covered by the adopted Reserve Fund Program. Considering the provisions of the otay Ranch Property Tax Agreement, there are two types of potential city operating deficits that could conceivably result in such a need to amend the Reserve Fund Program: - To cover any potential city operating deficits that may not be covered by the County through transfer payments during the first twenty years if the limitations in the Property Tax Agreement prevent the City from being fully covered by the County's transfer payments. - To cover any potential city operating deficits that might occur after the County's 20-year transfer payment obligation period ends in FY 2016-17. At this point, staff believes that it is likely that the Property Tax Transfer Agreement with the County will cover any operating deficits from the otay Ranch that the City might incur through FY 2016-17, and that the city will be in a surplus rather than a deficit position in otay Ranch operating costs by then, so staff is not recommending that the initial fee for the Reserve Fund include a component to cover potential City deficits. Instead, staff is recommending that the initial fee for the Reserve Fund be established to cover the annual fiscal impact analysis discussed above. While not reflected in the initial fee, the Reserve Fund Program will allow for the possibility, if necessary at some future point, to amend the Reserve Fund Program to include a Reserve Fund fee component to cover any potential city deficits that may not be covered by the County through transfer payments through the first twenty years or to cover any potential City deficits that might occur after the county's 20-year transfer payment obligation ends. The Property Tax Transfer Agreement requires the city to pay for the County's staff costs of participating in the annual fiscal analysis unless the City arranges for another source, such as the Developer Reserve Fund, to pay for the County's staff costs. The County's staff costs are limited to $30,000 the first year, $15,000 the second year, and $10,000 for years 3 through 20 with these maximums subject to an annual CPI adjustment and other potential adjustments. Attachment 1 provides an estimate of the cost of conducting the annual otay Ranch fiscal analysis, jointly with the County for the first 20 years and without the County's participation for years 21 through 35. These estimates include an estimate of contractor costs for running the FIND Model. The cost estimate is the highest /I·I-J _ __ ___.____~__. "._....._._._ ___'__~_'_____'_.___"~__'__'_m____'________'__~_ Meeting Date for the first year the FIND Model is run, decreasing in the second year and also in the third year and then remaining flat until year 21, when the County's involvement ends and the annual cost is further reduced. As indicated in Attachment 1, the total estimated cost of conducting the annual fiscal analysis over 35 years is $626,000 in current year dollars. These costs will likely increase over time depending on inflation rates. Because the FIND Model projections indicate that the City's deficits result from residential development, not commercial or industrial, it is recommended that the fees for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund be tied to residential units. The GDP indicates a total of 18,367 dwelling units (both single family and multi- family) on the portions of otay Ranch covered by the otay Ranch Property Tax Transfer Agreement (most of the western parcel, the "inverted L", and the ranchhouse area). Dividing the $626,000 total estimated cost of conducting the annual fiscal analysis by the 18,367 dwelling units would result in an initial fee of $34.08 per dwelling unit. As discussed above and illustrated in Attachment 1, however, the annual cost of conducting the fiscal analysis is projected to be significantly higher in the first two years than thereafter. staff therefore proposes that a higher fee of $124.00 per dwelling unit be charged for the first 1,500 dwelling units to cover the estimated first five years of cost ($186,000), and $26.09 per dwelling unit be charged for the remaining 16,867 dwelling units to cover the remaining estimated cost ($440,000), as shown on Attachment 1. These fees would be collected at the building permit stage and would need to be increased over time to take into account the increases in the cost of processing over the 35-year period starting in FY 1997-98. The proposed ordinance specifies that the otay Ranch Reserve Fund fee shall be suspended when the City Council determines that adequate funds have been collected for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund or that no further expenditures will be required from the otay Ranch Reserve Fund. At that time, the Finance Director would provide a report to the City Council summarizing the revenues and expenditures up to that time for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund as well as any projected funding requirements for the Reserve Fund. At that time, if there are surplus funds available in the Reserve Fund, the City Manager will provide a recommendation to the City Council on the most fair and equitable disposition of any excess fees that may have been collected. For example, any remaining balance of the Reserve Fund could be divided by the number of residential units for each developer or applicant who has paid the Reserve Fund fee. The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the /1,/- Y ---~~-~ .. .~- - - -_..~--_._... _.__.._.~._...... --- _._--_...._--------_.._---~._.- -. --- ,...-....-----...---------.-.... Meeting Date 7f~/t (p Page 5 proposed ordinance is exempt under the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b) (3). FISCAL IMPACT: Based on the most recent Ralph Anderson FIND Model analysis (1995) and the provisions of the adopted Property Tax Transfer Agreement, the City is projected to receive a surplus of approximately $18.4 million (in current year dollars) from development in the parts of the Otay Ranch covered by the Property Tax Agreement over a 30-year period. The City's actual fiscal impact will depend on a myriad of factors involving the actual land use mix and phasing of the development as well as City (and County) cost and revenue patterns. The otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program will provide the estimated $626,000 in funding for the annual fiscal impact studies needed to implement the adopted Property Tax Transfer Agreement, including the county's costs for the first twenty years as well as the City's costs of conducting the fiscal impact studies for up to 35 years. The Reserve Fund Program, if amended to do so in the future, could also potentially serve as an "insurance" fund should city deficits in the buildout years exceed the levels the county is obligated to offset by the Property Tax Transfer Agreement or should such potential City deficits occur after the county's 20-year transfer payment obligation ends. Attachments: - Calculation of otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee - Ordinance establishing otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee - May 14, 1996 Council Agenda Statement - Resolution #18288 adopted May 14, 1996 establishing the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program - July 9, 1996 Public Hearing Notification Memo - Reserve Fund Fee Property Owner Distribution List M:\HOME\ADMIN\J1\RESERVE.OR ! / .J-~ - ----- - -_._._---~.~-~......_-~-~.._-_._'--_...-.._._'-_.__......._..,......-~'--"-- ._---~- ATTACHMENT 1 CALCULATION OF INITIAL FEE FOR OTAY RANCH RESERVE FUND YEAR CITY COUNTY CONTRACT ANNUAL YEARS TOTAL COST COST COST COST COST 1 $30,000 $30,000 $20,000 $80,000 1 $ 80,000 2 15,000 15,000 10,000 40,000 1 40,000 3-20 10,000 10,000 2,000 22,000 18 396,000 21 10,000 0 2,000 12,000 1 12,000 22-35 6,000 0 1,000 7,000 14 98,000 TOTAL 35 $626,000 ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO SPREADING THE COST: (B is Recommended) A. Cost If Spread Equally Over 18,367 Dwelling Units (DU) $626,000 / 18,367 = $34.08 Per DU B. Cost If 1st Five Year's Cost spread Over 1st 1,500 DU's (Recommended Approach) $186,000 is Cost For 1st 5 Years 440,000 is Cost For Years 6-35 $186,000 / 1,500 = $124.00 Per DU For 1st 1,500 DU's $440,000 / 16,867 = $26.09 Per DU For Remaining 16,867 DU's I } .¡--{¡; I _......_u.. --,~ ----".-.---.-.--r--~~--~-. ORDINANCE NO. ..) 6 ¡-- .3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE OTAY RANCH RESERVE FUND FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION 18288, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE OTAY RANCH RESERVE FUND PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) approved by the Chula vista City Council and the Board of Supervisors on October 28, 1993, required that: "All City local services provided to the incorporated portions of Otay Ranch, including direct and indirect costs, and including capital and operating costs, shall be covered by project revenues and project exactions. Shortfalls shall be covered through a specially designed fund established by the developer and through an agreement between the City of Chula vista and the County of San Diego;" and WHEREAS, the Otay Ranch GDP also requires that: "A reserve fund program shall be established concurrent with the approval of the first SPA, to correct any annual operating deficiencies incurred by the applicable jurisdiction. The reserve fund program shall finance the cost of an annual review and updated fiscal impact analysis, and be the basis for any transfer of monies from the reserve fund...;" and . WHEREAS, the Chula vista City Council on May 14, 1996 adopted Resolution 18288 establishing the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program; and WHEREAS, Resolution 18288 specifies that the Reserve Fund Program shall consist of the following: (a) The developer and/or applicant shall pay a fee, adopted by ordinance by the City Council, to pay for the financing of the cost of an annual review and updated fiscal impact analysis, as performed by the Fiscal Impact of New Development (FIND) Model. The FIND Model produces a representation of City and County fiscal impacts for any given year and throughout the Otay Ranch Project's buildout period. (b) The Property Tax Transfer Agreement, entered into with the County, by Resolution 18261, wherein the County has agreed to cover, subject to a number of contingencies, the potential City operating deficits from the otay Ranch Project that the City might incur through FY 2016-17; and WHEREAS, Resolution 18288 specifies that the City Council may amend the Reserve Fund Program, from time to time, to include additional fees to cover any potential City deficits that may not be covered by the adopted Reserve Fund Program; and 1 II ./-1 -.-.-+--.~.,."-.--,,.----_,~,_ WHEREAS, Resolution 18288 specifies that failure to comply with the terms of the Reserve Fund Program shall be considered a violation of the GDP at which time the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals granted for the otay Ranch Project, including issuance of building permits; and WHEREAS, the otay Ranch Property Tax Transfer Agreement was approved by the City Council on May 14, 1996 and by the County Board of Supervisors on May 15, 1996; and WHEREAS, said Property Tax Transfer Agreement calls for the city and county to jointly undertake an annual fiscal impact analysis of the project area for twenty years commencing with FY 1997-98 and for the County to utilize a portion of its annual fiscal surplus to offset any residential operating deficits incurred by the city through FY 2016-17, subject to specified constraints; and WHEREAS, the affected property owners were notified of the proposed otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program prior to its being adopted by the City Council on May 14, 1996; and WHEREAS, the affected property owners have been notified of the July 9, 1996 public hearing on the proposed otay Ranch Reserve Fund fee; and . WHEREAS, information regarding the fee and the estimated costs required to provide the service for which the fee is to be levied, was made available at the City Clerk's office; and WHEREAS, Attachment 1 describes the calculation of the initial fee for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund; and WHEREAS, the city Council has determined, based upon the evidence presented at the July 9, 1996 public hearing, including but not limited to the various reports and other information received by the City Council in the course of its business, that imposition of the otay Ranch Reserve Fund fee on all developments within the otay Ranch General Development Plan for which building permits have not yet been issued is necessary in order to protect the public safety and welfare, to ensure the effective implementation of the otay Ranch General Development Plan and is reasonably related to the development of the otay Ranch project; and WHEREAS, the FIND Model projections indicate that the city's operating deficits result from residential development, not commercial or industrial, so the proposed fees for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund are proposed to be tied to residential units, both single family and multi-family, on the portions of the otay Ranch covered by the otay Ranch Property Tax Transfer Agreement; and 2 11.¡-i5 .. .-..-.-- .-.... -,_..._.~--.. .-- ...- -,...-_._.._._~-........-.._-_.,-~_._-_......_._.._--_..,......_... WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that this proposed ordinance is exempt under the provisions of section 15061(b) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: section 1. Territory to which Fee is Applicable. The area of the City of Chula vista to which the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee herein established shall be applicable is the same as the "Affected Territory" defined in the Otay Ranch Property Tax Transfer Agreement adopted by the Chula Vista City Council on May 14, 1996, which is summarized as "Areas subject to 1996 Otay Ranch Property Tax Agreement" on the attached Exhibit A. Section 2. Purpose. By Resolution 18288, the City Council established the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program which is specified to include a fee paid by the developer and/or applicant. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee in accordance with Resolution 18288 and in accordance with the Otay Ranch General Development Plan. section 3. Establishment of Fee. An Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee ("Fee") to be expressed on a per residential dwelling,unit basis, shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for a residential development project within the Affected Territory. section 4. Determination of Dwelling units Each single family attached and detached dwelling unit shall be considered one dwelling unit for purposes of this Fee. Each mUlti-family attached and detached dwelling unit shall also be considered a dwelling unit for the purposes of this Fee. Commercial, industrial and other non-residential uses shall not be charged an otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee. section 5. Time to Determine Amount Due; Advance Payment Prohibited. The Fee for each residential dwelling unit shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance and shall be the amount as indicated at that time and not when the tentative map or final map was granted or applied for, or when the building permit plan check was conducted, or when application was made for the building permit. The Fee shall be adjusted from time to time as the City determines appropriate. 3 II . )-1 .__ ..__.,., ... __....._____.._.~.. ___.____.,_.__..,_____ u___.,.___..____,~__ .~-_. section 6. Amount of Fee. The Fee shall be calculated at the rate of $124.00 per dwelling unit for the first 1,500 dwelling units within the Affected Territory, and $26.09 per dwelling unit for the estimated remaining 16,867 dwelling units, after said first 1,500 dwelling units, within the Affected Territory. The calculation of the initial Fee for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund is shown in Attachment 1. The city Council intends to review the amount of this Fee annually or from time to time. The City Council may, at such reviews, adjust the amount of this Fee as necessary to assure compliance with the purposes of this Fee as set forth herein, the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program and the otay Ranch General Development Plan. Adjustments to the above Fee may be made by resolution. section 7. Authority for Accounting and Expenditures. The proceeds collected from the imposition of this Fee and any interest earned thereon shall be deposited into a separate fund or account ("otay Ranch Reserve Fund" ) which is hereby created and such proceeds shall be expended only for the purposes set forth in this ordinance. The Director of Finance is authorized to periodically make expenditures from the otay Ranch Reserve Fund for the purposes set forth herein. Expenditures from the otay Ranch Reserve Fund and any interest earned thereon shall be accounted for separately from o~her City accounts. section 8. Revision and Refund of Fees. At such time as the City council determines that this Fee is no longer required to be collected for the purposes set forth herein, the Fee shall be suspended. If the Fee is suspended as provided above, the Finance Director shall provide a report to the City Council summarizing the revenues and expenditures to date resulting from the Fee. I f there are surplus funds available, the city Manager shall provide a recommendation to the City Council on the most fair and equitable disposition of any excess Fees that may have been collected. In the absence of an alternative determination of fairness by the City Council, a refund which divides the remaining unused balance by the residential units for each developer or applicant who has paid the Fee for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund shall be deemed a fair method. section 9. Findings. 4 '/'/-1'0 .. -- - ~- _ _~_..^'__..._..._'_...___.___.._ .... ..__..._ H __,.._ The City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby finds that the establishment of the Fee is necessary to protect the public safety and welfare, to ensure the effective implementation of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan and is reasonably related to the development of the Otay Ranch Project, for the following reasons: A. The otay Ranch GDP requires that a Reserve Fund Program be established to correct any annual "operating deficiencies" incurred by the City as a result of the development of the otay Ranch Project and to finance the cost of an annual review and analysis of the fiscal impact this Project is having on the City. B. The FIND Model produces a representation of the Otay Ranch Project's fiscal impacts on the city and County for any given year to the buildout of such project. C. It is projected that the City's operating deficits will result from residential development, not commercial or industrial, so the proposed fees for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund are proposed to be tied to residential units, both single family and multi- family. D. The amount of the fee levied by this ordinance, to fund the FIND Analysis does not exceed the estimated cost of providing this service. It is anticipated that the FIND Analysis will be more costly for the first five years of the otay Ranch Project. E. The collection of the Fee established by this ordinance at the time of the building permit is necessary to ensure that funds will be available for the purposes described in Resolution 18288 and the otay Ranch GDP. section 10. Fee Additional to other Fees and Charges. The Fee established by this ordinance is in addition to the requirements imposed by other City laws, policies or regulations relating to the development of Otay Ranch. section 11. Time Limit for Judicial Action. Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this ordinance shall be brought within the time period as established by Government Code section 54995 after the effective date of this ordinance. section 12. Expiration of This Ordinance. This ordinance shall be of no further force and effect when the City Council determines that the Fees are no longer needed for the purposes stated herein. 5 //'/-11 .._".. ~ ----.- .-"--_._'-'-"~..------,,---- -----..----... section 13. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective sixty (60) days after its second reading and adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ 71A~~ Jim Thomson Ann Moore Deputy City Manager Interim City Attorney M:\hole\attorney\reserve.fee 6 //'/-/:2 -- +.--- --- ---_._~,......__._+~--~_._._-+_. a m r, >< ~'I '.. :T .. ,:, -. ~I C- -. ~ . r-+- ... I', I.: , » J' 'I- . , , --I L" . . . I ~ .... .... " , · I . , . \ ~' > I I Þ ~I I - I_- I . I , , . I . ..... 0 1__.. I ..- , . ~". .- N ~.. ;;; !. I I I · I · iÞ · I III , , , I , . , - , I , I~I~ , õ , I m 0 »"....» »"....» , CO) w ~z 0 cc...cø... CQ'" cø"" m Õ c ... 0 COCÞ ... 0 COCÞ 00::0 00 z :I CÞ'C ~DI CÞ'C GO DI C ~ - CÞ CÞ 3:11I CÞ CÞ 011I =r-' ;::;:r <Ii ~~ '< (1)< '<c ëØ :I ~DlIII :I~_III III~ GO 5~ õ CÞ'< III C CÞ'< DI C 311I õAi' DI :1...._1:1" :I..«C' 3< :I ... oa ('¡)-. "'1»';lJm 11I11I I ~ Co >C"'~ :I ;::;ëi >CDln c. = - :1- 11I- - n- DI 0 ::r0 /1/-/ } _ ~.._.~__"~.__""_......"-"_..u. _. ATTACHMENT 1 CALCULATION OF INITIAL FEE FOR OTAY RANCH RESERVE FUND YEAR CITY COUNTY CONTRACT ANNUAL YEARS TOTAL COST COST COST COST COST 1 $30,000 $30,000 $20,000 $80,000 1 $ 80,000 2 15,000 15,000 10,000 40,000 1 40,000 3-20 10,000 10,000 2,000 22,000 18 396,000 21 10,000 0 2,000 12,000 1 12,000 22-35 6,000 0 1,000 7,000 14 98,000 TOTAL 35 $626,000 ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO SPREADING THE COST: (B i8 Recommended) A. Cost If Spread Equally Over 18,367 Dwelling units (DU) $626,000 I 18,367 = $34.08 Per DU B. Cost If l·t Five Year's Cost Spread Over l·t 1,500 DU's (RecOmmended Approach) $186,000 is Cost For l·t 5 Years 440,000 is Cost For Years 6-35 $186,000 I 1,500 = $124.00 Per DU For l·t 1,500 DU's $440,000 I 16,867 = $26.09 Per DU For Remaining 16,867 DU's / /./~ /3) /-If ..._,_._~-_.."..__._._._-- ---- ~~ - COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item.1Æ.A.- t Meeting Date May 14. 1996 :IT£){ 'l'YTLE: A-1 Resolution 18261 approving the Property Tax Transfer Agreement with the County of San Diego for the otay Ranch A-2 Resolution,~It1t establishing the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program SUBMITTED BY: Deputy City M;RP~r ~homson REVIEWED BY: City Manager " íJ"G (4/5ths Vote: Yes_ No~) At its April 16, 1996 meeting, the City Council considered the proposed Property Tax Transfer Agreement with the county of San Diego for the otay Ranch, and continued the item to the April 30 Council meeting to obtain additional information from staff regarding: comparisons with other property tax agreements; the Fiscal Impact of New Development (FIND) Model and its methodology; commercial-property in otay Ranch; and the proposed Developer Reserve Fund and the provisions of the General Development Plan related to the Reserve Fund. At the April 30 meeting, the Council continued the proposed Property Tax Transfer Agreement until the related Landfill Agreement could be further refined and brought back to the City Council. The staff reports submitted to the Council for the April 16 and April 30 council meetings are attached for Council's information. The Landfill Agreement is discussed in a separate companion item on the council's May 14 agenda. This report also addresses the developer-funded otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program, and recommends establishment of the Reserve Fund Program with staff to schedule a subsequent public hearing establishing the fee for the Program. RECOMMENDATION: That council: 1- Adopt the resolution approving the Property Tax Transfer Agreement with the County for otay Ranch. . , Adopt th~ resolution establishing the Otay Ranch Reserve 2. Fund Program. 3. Direct staff to schedule a public hearing to establish the fee for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund. I/. /- /5 ~ ,_._.._.._.__.._.~..----.._------- .._-..-..-_.~.._------~-~~_.__..- Item Meeting Date May 14. 1996 Page 2 B01RD/COMK~BB~ON REcnVMv.Nn~T~ON: On September 12, 1995 the Council appointed Mayor Horton and councilmember Moot as an ad hoc council subcommittee regarding the property tax agreement with the county for otay Ranch. This ad hoc Council Subcommittee recommends approval of the proposed Property. Tax Transfer Agreement. I)IBCUSSYON: The proposed property Tax Transfer Agreement is described in detail in the attached staff reports submitted to the Council for the April 16 and April 30, 1996 Council meetings. The only changes that have been made to the proposed Property Tax Transfer Agreement since those previous reports have related to the contingencies of the Property Tax Agreement covered in section 5 of the Agreement. The proposed Property Tax Agreement is still contingent on LAFCO's approval of the addition of the panhandle area (excluding the County Landfill), or at least a minimum of village III and Planning Area 18-B, to the city's Sphere of Influence by August 5, 1996. The property Tax Agreement is also still contingent on the approval of a separate Landfill Agreement by both the city and the County, and that Agreement is discussed in a separate agenda statement. Instead of also being contingent upon the detachment of the Otay Landfill from the city, the revised Property Tax Agreement applies only to annexations or reorganizations occurring concurrent with, or subsequent to, the detachment of the otay Landfill from the city. This minor change is required to ensure that there is a valid Property Tax Agreement in effect so that LAFCO can process the annexation. The result is still that no otay Ranch annexation can occur prior to the detachment of the otay Landfill from the city. The only other change in the proposed Property Tax Agreement since the April staff reports is to provide a ·walk away· period that allows either the City or the County to rescind its approval of both the Property Tax Agreement and the Landfill Agreement at any time prior to the date for which LAFCO has scheduled the , commencement of a pearing on the first Otay Ranch annexation. To exercise this ·walR away· provision, however, both the property Tax Agreement and the Landfill Agreement must be rescinded at the same time. As discussed in the April 16, 1996 staff report on the property Tax Transfer Agreement, the first annual otay Ranch fiscal impact analysis will be jointly undertaken by city and county staff in FY 1998-99 for fiscal year 1997-98 to determine whether any transfer HL~ I/. /-J~ ----- -------~_._~-- Item Meeting Date May 14. 1996 Page 3 payments should be made from the County to the city for any City deficits resulting from the otay Ranch project during fiscal year 1997-98. It is anticipated that an alternative, less expensive procedure than that represented by the FIND Model may be used until some minimum number (such as 500 to 1,000) of dwelling units are occupied in the otay Ranch area. The Property Tax Agreement also provides that the contract officers for the City and the County may, by mutual consent, modify the FIND Model or replace it on an interim or ongoing basis with another fiscal model or simpler methodology. The Agreement also specifies that the County Board of supervisors and Chula vista City council may, at any time, agree to discontinue the annual fiscal analysis described in the Agreement upon mutually agreeable terms. otav Ranch Reserve Fund Pr09ram As discussed in the attached April 30, 1996 staff report, the otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) approved by the Chula vista City council and the Board of Supervisors on October 28, 1993, included the following policy on page 264 of the GDP: "All City local services provided to the incorporated portions of otay Ranch, including direct and indirect costs, and including capital and operating costs, shall be covered by project revenues and project exactions. Shortfalls shall be covered through a specially designated fund established by the developer and through an agreement between the city of Chula vista and the County of San Diego. Capital costs for regional facilities shall also be covered by project revenues..." The otay Ranch GDP also includes an Implementation Measure on page 265 that states: "A reserve fund program shall be established concurrent with the approval of the first SPA, to correct any annual operating deficiencies incurred by the applicable jurisdiction. The reserve fund program shall finance the cost of an annual review and updated fiscal impact analysis, and be the basis for any transfer of monies from the reserve fund...· As described in detail in the attached April 16, 1996 Council agenda statement regarding the proposed Property Tax Agreement, , that Agreement calls for the City and County to jointly undertake an annual fiscal impact analysis of the project area for twenty years commencing with FY 1997-98 and for the County to utilize a portion of its annual fiscal surplus to offset any residual operating deficits incurred by the city through FY 2016-17, subject to specified constraints. ~ I/. 111 Item Meeting Date May 14. 1996 Page 4 The Developer Reserve Fund required by the otay Ranch GDP therefore has three potential purposes: 1- To provide funds to conduct the annual fiscal impact studies of the otay Ranch required by the GDP. 2. To cover any potential City operating deficits that may not be covered by the County through transfer payments during the first twenty years if the limitations in the Property Tax Agreement prevent the City from being fully covered by the County's transfer payments. 3. To cover any potential City operating deficits that might occur after the County's 20-year transfer payment obligation period ends in FY 2016-17. Staff belíeves that the first item above, providing funding to conduct the annual fiscal analysis, should clearly be a requirement of the Developer Reserve Fund. The Property Tax Agreement requires the City to pay for the county's staff costs of participating in the annual fiscal analysis unless the City arranges for another source, such as the Developer Reserve Fund, to pay for the County's staff costs. The county's staff costs are limited to $30,000 the first year, $15,000 the second year, and $10,000 for years 3 through 20, with these maximums sUbject to an annual CPI adjustment. Attachment 1 provides an estimate of the cost of conducting the annual otay Ranch fiscal analysis, jointly with the County for the first 20 years and without the County's participation for years 21 through 35. These estimates include an estimate of contractor costs for running the FIND Model. The cost estimate is the highest for the first year, decreasing in the second year and also in the third year and then remaining flat until year 21, when the County's involvement ends and the annual cost .is further reduced. As indicated in Attachment 1, the total estimated cost of conducting the fiscal analysis over 35 years is $626,000 in current year .- dollars. These _~osts would increase over time depending on inflation rates. Because the FIND Model projections indicate that the city's deficits result from residential development, not commercial or industrial, it is recommended that the fees for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund be tied to residential units. The GDP indicates a total of 18,367 dwelling units (both single family and multi- family) on the portions of otay Ranch covered by the proposed ~ _ ._ JJ /! /18 ----.--,,,--.--------.., .-_.~,._._-,~._.__._,- _._,,_.",,-- Item Meeting Date Mav 14. 1996 Page 5 Property Tax Agreement (the western parcel, "inverted L", and ranchhouse area). Dividing the $626,000 total estimated cost of conducting the annual fiscal analysis by the 18,367 dwelling units would result in an initial fee of $34.08 per dwelling unit. As discussed above and illustrated in Attachment 1, however, the annual cost of conducting the fiscal analysis is projected to be significantly higher in the first two years than thereafter. Staff therefore proposes that a higher fee of $124.00 per dwelling unit be charged for the first 1,500 dwelling units and $26.09 per dwelling unit be charged for the remaining 16,867 dwelling units as shown on Attachment 1. These fees could either be collected at the tentative map stage or at the building permit stage, and will need to be increased over time to take into account the increases in the cost of processing. At this p~int, staff believes that it is likely that the Property Tax Agreement with the County will cover any operating deficits from the otay Ranch that the city might incur through FY 2016-17, so staff is not recommending that the initial fee for the Reserve Fund include a component to cover potential City deficits. Instead, staff is recommending that the initial fee for the Reserve Fund be established to cover the annual fiscal impact studies discussed above. Staff recommends that Council adopt the resolution establishing the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program and direct staff to prepare the necessary documents to be considered at a subsequent public hearing to adopt the initial fee for the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program. While not reflected in the initial fee, the Reserve Fund Program will allow for the possibility, if necessary at some future point, to include a component of the fee for the Reserve Fund to cover any potential City deficits that may not be covered by the County through transfer payments through the first twenty years or to cover any potential city deficits that might occur after the county's 20-year transfer payment obligation ends. The proposed resolution establishes the otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program as described above. . PISCAL IMPACT: Based on the most recent Ralph Anderson FIND Model analysis (1995) and the provisions of the proposed Property Tax Transfer Agreement, the City is projected to receive a surplus of approximately $18.4 million (in current year dollars) from development in the parts of the otay Ranch covered by this Agreement over a 30-year period. This is $37.6 million more than the potential $19.2 million deficit that would be projected if the - - I/. /-/q .M1t~==-Sm~~ _ .~ ___ ~__ ._ _ ~ ~_____~~__~_____~.~~. Item Meeting Date Mav ]4. 1996 Page 6 1984 Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement applied to the otay Ranch rather than the proposed Property Tax Agreement. The City's actual impact will depend on a myriad of factors involving the actual land use mix and phasing of the development as well as City (and county) cost and revenue patterns. The otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program will provide funds for the annual fiscal impact studies needed to implement the proposed Property Tax Agreement and potentially will serve as an "insurance" fund should city deficits in the buildout years exceed the levels the County is obligated to offset by the proposed Agreement or should such potential city deficits occur after the county's 20- year transfer payment obligation ends. Attachments: - Calculation of Initial fee for Reserve Fund - April 16, 1996 Council Agenda statement on property Tax Agreement - April 30, 1996 supplemental Report on Property Tax Agreement M:\HOME\ADMIN\JT\PROPTAX.A13 < , . - \ \ . I ~:lD . -~_. .,.--"--,,.__.. -....--.,-...- --.._-----_._--~~ -- ---------......:......-..-.... ~ ----~--- RESOLUTION 18288 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING THE OTAY RANCH RESERVE FUND PROGRAM WHEREAS, an application for adoption of the Otay Rancho Sectional Planning Area (SPA) One Plan, was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning Department on July 27, 1994 by the Otay Ranch L.P.; and WHEREAS, the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), covering 22.9000 acres of land, requires a Reserve Fund Program to be established concurrent with the approval of the first SPA to correct any annual operating deficiencies incurred by the City of Chula Vista ("Project"); and WHEREAS, a Property Tax Transfer Agreement has been entered into with the County of San Diego. by Resolution No. 18261, wherein the County has agreed to cover, subject to a number of contingencies, the potential City operating deficits from the Otay Ranch Project that the City might incur through FY 2016-17; and WHEREAS, the Reserve Fund Program shall finance the cost of an annual review and an updated fiscal impact analysis, as performed by the Fiscal Impact of New Development (FIND) Model as described in the Property Tax Transfer Agreement for Otay Ranch. The FIND Model produces a representation of City and County fiscal impacts for any given year and throughout the Otay Ranch project's buildout period; and WHEREAS, the GDP requires a Reserve Fund Program to be established concurrent with the approval of the first SPA, to correct any annual operating deficiencies incurred by the City; and WHEREAS, the GDP requires the applicant to be financially responsible for any operating deficiencies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve, and order as follows: I. CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN The proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan for the following reasons: A. THE PROPOSED OT A Y RANCH RESERVE FUND PROGRAM IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN The Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program advances the goal of the Otay Ranch GDP that, "new development pay its own way." B. THE PROPOSED RESERVE FUND PROGRAM WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTlALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA. 1/, / -;).1 -,~-, ." ....-,-.....-., ..--..... -_...-----"_._-----,~,,_.,".._..-_._-"--,_._- -_.,~_. Resolution 18288 Page 2 I The Reserve Fund Program advances the goals, objectives, and policies of the Otay Ranch GDP and the City of Chula Vista by assuring the efficient and timely provision of public services and facilities to developable areas of the Otay Ranch concurrent with need by identifying a funding source that will correct any annual opereting deficiencies incurred by the applicable jurisdiction. II. ESTABLISHING OF RESERVE FUND The City Council hereby establishes a Reserve Fund Program, in accordance with the GDP, said Program shall consist of the following: a. The Developer and/or Applicant shall pay a fee, adopted by ordinance by the City Council, to pay for the financing of the cost of an annual review and an updated fiscal impact analysis, as performed by the Fiscal Impact of New Devalopment (FIND) Model. The FIND Model produces a representation of City and County fiscal impacts for any given year and throughout the Otay Ranch project's build out period. b. The Property Tax Transfer Agreement, entered into with the County, by Resolution No. 18261, wherein the County has agreed to cover, subject to a number of contingencies, the potential City operating deficits from the Otey Ranch Project that the City might incur through FY 2016-17. III. AMENDMENTS TO RESERVE FUND The City Council may amend the Reserve Fund Program, from time to time, to include additional fees to cover any potential City deficits that may not be covered by the Reserve Fund Program, as adopted herein. IV. NONCOMPLIANCE Failure to comply with the terms of the Reserve Fund Program shall be considered e violation of the GDP at which time the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals granted for the Otay Ranch Project, including issuance of building permits. Presented by .J) ,Gerald Jamri ka, Manager - . Bruce M. Boogsard Special Plann g Projects City Attorney / I . ¡ -?-¢- "___.'.m _.. .. __....._..._.._"..__.__.._._._~_ __._ --- --- .. ----...--..----------.---.-----.-.---.- Resolution 18288 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 14th day of May, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: Council members: Alevy, Moot, Padilla, Rindone, Horton NA YES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ABSTAIN: Council members: None -- Shirley Horton, Mayor ATTEST: ~ () (2,71. a; Beverly . Authelet, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 18288 was duly passed. approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 14th day of May, 1996. Executed this 14th day of May, 1996. , ~C fldß,J , Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk il ,) - 1-3 ___ . _ ___~__._____._..._...__._.___ ._.. _____ _.____~_.____·____'__.__M_.._ ~~~ -.- ........,,;:-~ ....,.;::.... - cnv OF CHUlA VISTA MRMORANßIJM July 2, 1996 TO Distribution List / FROM Jim Thomson, Deputy City Manager J I SUBJECT Notification of July 9 Public Hearing Regarding Adoption of Fee for Otay Ranch Reserve Fund At the July 9, 1996 Council meeting, the Chula Vista City Council will conduct a public hearing regarding the adoption of the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee, and consider an ordinance establishing the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee. This fee would apply to residential units within the Otay Ranch. The Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Program was established by Resolution 18288, adopted at the May 14, 1996 City Council meeting, in accordance with the provisions of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan approved by the City Council and the Board of Supervisors on October 28, 1993. The attached staff report provides additional information regarding the Otay Ranch Reserve Fund Fee. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the July 9 public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerks' office at or prior to the public hearing. The July 9 City Council meeting will begin at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue in the Chula Vista Civic Center. For further information, call Deputy City Manager Jim Thomson at 691-5031 or Finance Director Bob Powell at 691-5051. Attachment cc: Bob Powell Jerry Jamriska M,IHOME\ADMIN\I1\RESERFUN,OR I ) -J. ~ - "_.~ __._u_..._.. ---- ---~.._-.~----.---.-----.-----.---.-----.'~-- VÎllage Development -Š-Itzer Caplan Wilkins &. McMahon P,O. Box 2786 11975 EI Camino Real, Suite 104 750 'B' S...... Suite 2100 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 San Diego. CA 92130 San Diego. CA 92101 . Stephen &. Mary B~on, Inc. SNMB Ud. United Eoterprùes LId, 7811 La Mesa Boulevard. Suite B-3 1071 Sixth Avenue, Suite 258 3650 Silverside Road, Suite 1048 La Mesa. CA 91941 San Diego, CA 92101 Wilmington. DE 19810 --- Colony AdWon, Inc. -The Batdwin Cõinpany 55S South Flower Street. 23rd Floor 1999 Avenue oftbe Stan, Suite 1200 16811 Hale Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071·2371 Los Angeles, CA 90067 1tvU1e, CA 92606 Lempres &. Wulf_g Solomon Ward Seidenwunn & Smith Jewels of Charity, Inc. 300 Lakeside Drive, 24th Floor 401 'B' Street. Suite 1200 70S Severn Road, Suile 1040 OokJand, CA 94612·3524 San Diego, CA 92101 Wilmington, DE t9810 Stephenson wõriey OarTatt Schwartz Heidel & Prairie tOI West Broadway. Suite 1300 San Diego, CA 92101 RESERVE FUND FEE PROPERTY OWNER DISTRIBUTION LIST II.I-d-~ - ".-. .- --_.~..------~_._._-, COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /.)- Meeting Date 7/16/96 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Open Space District No.1 for Fiscal Year 1996-97. Resolution / ~ J" o?ctering certain open space and maintenance facilities to be maintained, approving modification to the Engineer's Report and levying the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97 Open Space District No. 1. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public W orks ~ Director of Parks and Rec eatio REVIEWED BY: City Manager '-Ìi ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.xJ --7 Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, agenda items and have been separated due to conflict of interest concerns. One Council member owns property subject to the proposed assessment in this district. Council should note that agenda statement gives all background information and details on open space districts in general which is applicable to this item, but does not include specific information on Open Space District 1. A public hearing was held on June 18, 1996, to receive testimony on the proposed assessments. This is the second and final public hearing as required by law. RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1) Open the hearing, take testimony, and close the hearing. 2) Direct staff to tally all protests. 3) Adopt the resolution to approve the modification to the Engineer's Report and levying the assessments for FY 1996/97. DISCUSSION: This agenda item is the yearly resolution to assess for open space maintenance within Open Space District Maintenance District Number 1 located between East H Street and Telegraph Canyon Road, east of Paseo Ranchero (see Attachment A). Table 1 relates the present year's assessment to the proposed assessment for Year 1996-97. Agenda item of tonight's agenda contains all the general information regarding open space districts. 1;2-/ - Page 2, Item / :L Meeting Date 7/16/96 TABLE 1 PRIOR FY'S VS. FY 96/97 ASSESSMENT/COLLECTIBLE FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 95-96 96/97 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Revenue EDU EDU EDU Assmt + Assmt/ Collection! CP1(2) EDU(3) EDU OSD No. I $77 $53 $81 $82.86 $86(1) $86 $56,900 El Rancho del Rey Units 1-4 (1) Assessment increase is 3.8% ($3.14/EDU subject to majority protest), plus future CPI adjustments. (2) FY 96/97 assessment may be set at or below the cap without being subject to majority protest. (3) Does not reflect subsequent year CPI adjustments. Staff recommends an increase in assessment from $81 to only $86 per EDU to reflect the estimated cost and funds needed for FY 96/97. This represents a $5 per EDU increase. Staff also recommends a collectible of $86 per EDU, which is equal to the proposed assessment. An increase in assessment is recommend because of an increase in contractual services due to asphalt concrete sidewalk repair, which is a supplemental work item. This work was to make repairs to the meandering bike path on the south side of East H Street between the Methodist Church and the entrance to Southwestern College. This recommendation reflects not increasing the reserve for the supplemental, one-time only work items. The reserve under this recommendation will be 50% for all on-going work items. The recommendation of $86 per EDU is an amount greater than the current year's assessment plus CPI. Consequently, the increase above CPI, $3. 14/EDU ($2,100), is subject to a majority protest. Should this occur, there will be a shortfall of funds unless Council reduces the budget or the reserves are reduced below .2Q % . FISCAL IMPACT: Staff costs associated with the open space program are generated by Parks and Recreation, Public Works, and Data Processing. Contractual costs ($34,711) are outlined in Attachment B. These costs are recovered through the Open Space District collectible, causing no net fiscal impact. The General Fund will be reimbursed $9,836 from the OSD fund for FY 1996-97 for City staff services. Attachments: A District Map B Estimate of Cost M:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\OSDtPH2.DDS /.2-2 ..____..__u RESOLUTION NO. / y;?¿. '} RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of this resolution, the city Council has caused the formation of various districts under and pursuant to either the Chula vista Open Space District Procedural Ordinance ("Procedural Ordinance"), as contained in Chapter 17.07 (adopting in substantial part the 1972 Lighting and Landscaping Act ("Act") as contained in Streets and Highways Code Section 22500, et seq. , or pursuant to the Act itself designated as Open Space District No. 1; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance, the City Engineer has prepared a report on the spread of assessments fo.r said Open Space and Maintenance Districts ("Engineer's Report") ; and, WHEREAS, on May 21, 1996, the City Council approved the Engineer's Report and set June 18, 1996 and July 16, 1996 as the dates for the public hearings; and, WHEREAS, the proposed individual assessment for Open Space District 1 for Fiscal Year 1996-97 is shown below: TABLE I PRIOR FY'S VS. FY 96/97 ASSESSMENT/COLLECTIBLE FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 95-96 96/97 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection/ Assmi/ FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Revenue EDU EDU EDU Assmt + Assmt/ Collection/ CPIQ) EDU(3) EDU OSD No. I $77 $53 $81 $82.86 $86(1) $86 $56,900 El Rancho del Rey Units 1-4 (I) Assessment increase is 3.8% ($3.14/EDU subject to majority protest), plus future CPI adjustments. (2) FY 96/97 assessment may be set at or below the cap without being subject to majority protest. ß) Does not reflect subsequent year CPI adjustments. /;2~ 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as to Open Space and Maintenance District No. 1, that the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby find that written protests against the proposed assessment increase have not been made by owners representing more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvement and confirms the diagram and assessment contained in the modified Engineer's Report, and orders the open space and maintenance facilities to be maintained. The adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of the assessment as proposed in the modified Engineer's Report for the 1996-97 fiscal year and set forth hereinabove for Open Space and Maintenance District No. lo Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt Clv-- ~ ~'+-'--Q Ann Y. oore Director of Public Works Interim City Attorney J~ -'I ..- - .....-----.-- "- -~ -- -"'-- , - . '. . . . .. · . · . . .....:a- . .. i , . . · . /,2 .,y - . ) :'I I 11[1 II I ~ ~ítii i illlJlfiiJiljl m: If 4- ~ .¡:. I i f i~ n I I~' ~tt n i ~~ ... - § .. 01_ Ole :- .... ~ :0 .. i ~.... ... ~'t.o"'"8- ã ...,OIWWN\,ft 0\ 01 VIi W ... -...g;....!;;¡ ~I.... -. I ~. ...~ ~ ?~ ~~ ~ -OIl \Co ~!( ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 88 8 8 8 888888 "'> ~ li.~ .. .. tilt.. ~ Q ~ w u. w VIi ... -52 .. ...._ _ \.It - ...... ." ~å Ep ... ... "8-....~ ~ Š~~~§ !g ~. I.A VIi ...,- N _. = Ò... .:01'" ~ !"~ w!" ? £... ~21- .~~ ~~ ~ 88~~8 8 88888 88 ~~ ~~ : ... n -- .... ... ~ t ... - ...... - ~ . ~ ~ ~ w~\ØQ"'" ...~ g;. ..-... !ëõ i QQQ ) ~ ~ 2 8 88888 88 . \ I,) -? ---..--.-..-----....--..-------...- ~~~ ( June 6, 1996 900 Otay Lakes Rd. Chula Vista, Calif 91910 City of Chula Vista Dept. Of Public Works, Engr. Div. 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, Calif. 91910 Dear Sir, Referenc.e your notice dated 5/23/96 on the subject ofannual assessment for maintenance of the Open Space District; I have no trouble with a modest increase ¡fyou stipulate that all such monies will be used exclusively and directly for the maintenance of open spaces adjacent or near by. I would appreciate a response assuring me that this will be the case. If necessary please forward this letter to the City Council for a public clarification. Thank you II ( W. D. Snell . ( J~-7 Oé\) \ or IS" ? ,.~. '.-0\ 1..-('7/'1(; ---"--...- ..-.-.--.--.-- - ."- . . , ( Memo To: Donna Snider From: John Strasner Date: June 4, 1996 Re: Open Space District 1 annual assessment. Regarding the annual assessment proposal for maintenance of the Open Space District area 1, I have no objection to the new amount of $82.86 providing the following is met. Who ever is contracted to perfonn the maintenance does IJgS kill the Ivy on our wall u is the case currently. It has taken me over two (2) months to clean the dead Ivy from over 100 feet of our property adjacent to the park. The cause of the dead Ivy was a direct result of the current maintenance crew using foliage killer which penetrated the roots of our I~ and killed It. By all rights we should have had the park maintenance crew clean up the mess they left and replant new Ivy In Its place. We will not do that If the future maintenance crew only cleans the park side Ivy and does not kill the plant. ( ~gards. ~ John Strasner 1369 Don Carlos Ct. Chula Vista, CA 91910-7107 421-8485 . ( ),2-y O~D*\ t3~~~~."l~{~~~- .... {)S]) I ,., ' . , mE em OF œvu J7ST P.4RTYÞ1SCLOSURE.STÂTEMENT · ·'atl:ment of discJO$ure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campai¡n coøtributioDi, on eD mattm \ .,hicb will require discretioJW)' action on the pan of the aty CouneD, PJannin¡ ðmttw.øqon, anef an other official bodies. The foDowin¡ infonnation must be dÍJl'losed: ,',' 1. Ust the umes of aD peøons llavin¡ a financiaJ Jnterat In the ClDDtract. t.e.. ClDDtractar, IUbcon~;¡í' mate~ supplier. . 2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corpo.ation or partnerIbf,p, list the umes of aD individuaJs 0WDin¡ more than 10% of the Ibares In the C01t^NAticm or 0WDiD¡ lID)' pumership interest In the partnership. 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit orpnization or a trust, list"the DamCS' of any person serving as director of the non-profit orpnizatiOJl or as trustee or bene6ciaJy or trustor of the trust. . - ( 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with .·Jf member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Councß within the put tweJ'-'.: months? Yes_ No _ If yes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please identify each and every person, iJlcJudúl¡ any apnts, empJoyees, CODSUJtan~ or independent contractors who you have assi¡ned to represent you before the City in this matter. 6. Have you and/or your officers or apts, in the aøre¡ate. contributed moie tban'SJ,OOO to a CouncJJmember In the current or precediJI¡ election period? Yes _ No _ If,., ate whIch Councilmember(s): '"nnn II~ØDIII.: "Ally1tt4itlltlM."""",...""",.".,jtIhIt-.. J J {."'If.M..-t...,.II....r.... L -'",\ MJIII>1I1iM, ølntr. .. IWI'iwIr, ~ IItú 11IIII ØI)' -- CIIIII/)'. ., - -IIÞ)\ ciO\ _1II'q, -~~ 1IIIIiI:t.,... OIIta, IIIbdillbion, ., III)'''' PI" eømbiluuion .,." III..." ' . (NOTE: AlllcII addltlOllll .... . II r ; II .~ry) ( .e: Sipature of CODtraclorlapplicant /,2-? . Print or type Dame of CODtractorlapplicant 1·\·1 U.\;DI5a.OSn.1'-Ï fIIeoioed: II-I .~ ~~f QSt> \'ð . THE em OF CHUU nSTA P..4RTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT , Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contnòutions, on aU matters '( which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and'all other I official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. Ust the names of aU persons having a financial interest in· the contract, ie., contractor, .- con r, material supplier. 2. If any person identified 'pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10%' of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list"the names' of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. ( t 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No _ If yes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. 6, Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contnbuted more than '$1,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No _ If yes, state which Councilmember(s): fm!!!l is dcrlDec, as: "Any individual,flrm, _pnnnmhip. joint -/In, tultJt:ÏatÌDll, ,"ial dub. frøtmull t1IfØ1IÍZtIlÌCNI, corporntion, cstllte, trust, -aver. syndicate, this tlnd tiny OIhør county, city and COI/IIII)'. city, nwnicipnlity, district or Ølhør politiœl mbdivisiotl, or .1IIY OIhør group or t:onlbinttlion acting lIS a unit." . (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) ( )ate: Signature of contractor/applicant ( /3'7 Print or type name of contractor/applicant , 1·\,: 11.\;DISClOSE.Th'l [Revi>cd; II/WJO .... ------- .. -----_._-~.- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Itemll Meeting Date 7/16/96 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Open Space District No. 10 for Fiscal Year 1996-97. R l' /8".:l¿{.d·· d' fT' b .. d eso utlOn r enng certam open space an mamtenance aCl ltIes to e mamtame , approving modification to the Engineer's Report and levying the assessments for Fiscal year 1996/97 Open Space District No. 10. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works~ Director of Parks and Recreatio REVIEWED BY: City Manager0Q ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..x) --:> Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, agenda items , and have been separated due to conflict of interest concerns. One Council member owns property subject to the proposed assessment in this district. Council should note that agenda statement gives all background information and details on open space districts in general which is applicable to this item, but does not include specific information on Open Space District 10. A public hearing was held on June 18, 1996, to receive testimony on the proposed assessments. This is the second and final public hearing as required by law. RECOMMENDATION: That Council: I) Open the hearing, take testimony, close the hearing. 2) Direct staff to tally all protests. 3) Adopt the resolution to approve the modification to the Engineer's Report and levying the assessments for FY 1996/97. DlSCUSSION: This agenda item is the yearly resolution to assess for open space maintenance within Open Space District Number 10 located along East J Street, west of Paseo Ranchero (see Attachment A). Table I relates the present year's assessment to the proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 1996/97. Agenda item of tonight's agenda contains all the general information regarding open space districts. /3 -¡ ..."_... ___.m._~_____.__'_'_"_ ._ ..... _._."'. Page 2, Item / J Meeting Date 7/16/96 TABLE 1 PRIOR FY'S VS. FY 96/97 ASSESSMENT/COLLECTIBLE FY94-95 FY95-96 FY95-96 96/97 Proposed Proposed FY 95-96 Assrnnt/ Collection! Assmt/ CAP: FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Revenue EDU EDU EDU FY 95-96 Assrnnt/ Collection! Assmt + EDU(2) EDU CP1(J) Open Space District No. 10 $42 $71 $83 $84.91 $84.91 $84 $52,951 El Rancho del Rey 6 & Casa del Rey (I) FY 96/97 assessment may be set at or below this cap without being subject to a majority protest. (2) Does not reflect subsequent year CPI adjustments. Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same 'as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $84 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, which is less than the assessment of $84.91, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 59%. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff costs associated with the open space program are generated by Parks and Recreation, Public Works, and Data Processing. Contractual costs ($31,613) are outlined in Attachment B. These costs are recovered through the Open Space District collectible, causing no net fiscal impact. The General Fund will be reimbursed $8,285 from the OSD fund for FY 1996-97. Attachments: A District Map B Estimate of Cost M:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\OSD1OPH2.DDS ).3'-2 RESOLUTION NO. /? :J ~ r RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 10 WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of this resolution, the city Council has caused the formation of various districts under and pursuant to either the Chula vista Open Space District Procedural Ordinance ("Procedural Ordinance"), as contained in Chapter 17.07 (adopting in substantial part the 1972 Lighting and Landscaping Act ("Act") as contained in Streets and Highways Code section 22500, et seq., or pursuant to the Act itself designated as Open space District No. 10; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance, the City Engineer has prepared a report on the spread of assessments for said Open Space and Maintenance Districts ("Engineer's Report"); and, WHEREAS, on May 21, 1996, the City Council approved the Engineer's Report and set June 18, 1996 and July 16, 1996 as the dates for the public hearings; and, WHEREAS, the proposed individual assessment for Open Space District 10 for Fiscal Year 1996-97 is shown below: TABLE 1 PRIOR FY'S VS. FY 96/97 ASSESSMENT/COLLECTIBLE FY94-95 FY95-96 FY95-96 96/97 Proposed Prop~sed FY 95- Assmnt/ Collection/ Assmt/ CAP: FY 96-97 FY 96- 96 EDU EDU EDU FY 95-96 Assmnt/ 97 Revenue Assmt + EDU(2) Collec- CPl(1) tion/ EDU Open Space District No. $42 $71 $83 $84.91 $84.91 $84 $52,951 10 El Rancho del Rey 6 & Casa del Rey {lj FY 96/97 assessment may be set at or below this cap without being subject to a majority protest. (2) Does not reflect subsequent year CPl adjustments. /3'J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as to Open Space and Maintenance District No. 10, that the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby find that written protests against the proposed assessment increase have not been made by owners representing more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvement and confirms the diagram and assessment contained in the modified Engineer's Report, and orders the open space and maintenance facilities to be maintained. The adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of the assessment as proposed in the modified Engineer's Report for the 1996-97 fiscal year and set forth hereinabove for Open Space and Maintenance District No. 10. Presented by Approved as to form by C^'^ " ~iG9<~ - John P. Lippitt Ann Y. Moore Director of Public Works Interim City Attorney C:\rs\OS10Levy J3~1 .....-.--...- .. ." . ~--~ -. -;-0". __. . . . - - .----::--..--...- ... - . ~ . Q §. - . .. ig-t ~b~ il ~l· ·1 ~~ . ~~ . . . . . . -' -_.._-_.~--~ .. - -- .A4tàc.\\ ~ + '3 .. ESTIMATE OF MAINTENANCE COSTS FY 96-97 OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 10 1996-1997 1995-1996 1994-1995 . Personal Services Utilities 5180.00 513,960.00 516,200.00 Trash Collection & Disposal Water 13,781.00 Service to main bldg,struct,grds 200.00 City Staff Services 8,285.00 6,800.00 6,160.00 Contract Services 31,613.00 31,330.00 31,330.00 Landscape Supplies 739.00 740.00 740.00 Materials to main bldgs,struct. 380.00 380.00 380.00 Backflow Certification 200.00 200.00 Professional Services Supplementals Other commodities Advertising ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE C 555,178.00 553,410.00 555,01 0.00 Reserve Requirement 532,555.00 529,086.00 Reserve Percent 59,00% 54.46% Additional reserve 0.00 0.00 Less Food Balance 534,900.00 536,402.00 NET ASSESSMENT 552,833.00 $44,624.00 EDU'S 630.37 630.37 630.37 CollectibleÆDU 583.81 570.79 $42.18 Percent change from prior years 18% 68% Collectible - even dollar 584 571 Revenue from even 5 payment 552,951 $44,756 Assessment 84.91 583 Assessment with CPI 2.3% 584.91 Budget/EDU . $87.53 584.73 587.27 Percent change from prior years 3% -3% .' Protest: J.3-t, F:\homelEngineer\Openspac\96osd,wq1 6/3/96 . ~...-~. ----- -..._- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item / 'f Meeting Date 7/16/96 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Eastlake Maintenance District No.1 for Fiscal Year 1996-97. R I' 18'-1¿'"1o d .. d' fT' b .. d eso utlOn r enng certam open space an mamtenance aCl ltles to e mamtame , approving modification to the Engineer's Report and levying the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996- 97 Eastlake Maintenance District No. 1. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works~ Director of Parks and Recrea . REVIEWED BY: City Manager-J4 ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..x) ~ Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, agenda items , and have been separated due to conflict of interest concerns. One Council member owns property subject to the proposed assessment in this district. Council should note that agenda statement gives all background information and details on open space districts in general which is applicable to this item, but does not include specific information on Eastlake Maintenance District No. 1 (ELMD1). A public hearing was held on June 18, 1996, to receive testimony on the proposed assessments. This is the second and final public hearing as required by law. RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1) Open the hearing, take testimony, close the hearing. 2) Direct staff to tally all protests. 3) Adopt the resolution to approve the modification to the Engineer's Report and levying the assessments for FY 1996/97. DISCUSSION: This agenda item is the yearly resolution to assess for open space maintenance within Eastlake Maintenance District Number 1, a City open space district, located along East H Street and Otay Lakes Road, adjacent to "SR 125" (Attachment A). Table 1 relates the present year's assessment to the proposed assessment for the Fiscal Year 1996/97. Agenda item of tonight's agenda contains all the general information regarding open space districts. 1'/--; Page 2, Item It( Meeting Date 7/16/96 TABLE 1 PRIOR FY'S VS. FY 96/97 ASSESSMENT/COLLECTIBLE OSD FY94/95 FY 95/96 FY 95/96 96/97 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY 95/96 Assmntl Collection! Assmnt/ FY 95/96 FY 96/97 FY 96/97 Revenue EDU EDU EDU Assmnt + Assmntl Collection! CP1(3) EDU(4) EDU ELMO #1(1) Easllake 1 $9.32 $4.34 $9.32 $9.53 $9.53 $8.10 $190,000 Easllake Greens 14.08 14.08 15.24 15.59 15.59 10.65 OTC 125.95 77.31 126.20 129.10 129.10 0.00 Salt Creek 1 168.32 167.38 168.32 172.18 172.18 167.74 TC Channell') 6.16 16.74 24.00 24.55 24.55 15.95 (I) All areas share in the cost of Otay Lakes Road medians and off-site parkways. (') Portions of Eastlake I BC and Eastlake Greens are in benefit area. (3) FY 96/97 assessment may be set at or below this cap without being subject to majority protest. (4) Does not reflect subsequent year CPI adjusttnents. Staff recommends that the assessments for each of the areas remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. In each of these cases, staff recommends an annual collectible, as shown in Table 1, which is less than the proposed assessment, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings, mostly in contractual services. The reserve varies for each zone. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff costs associated with the open space program are generated by Parks and Recreation, Public Works, and Data Processing. Contractual costs ($102,172) are outlined in Attachment B. These costs are recovered through the Open Space District collectible, causing no net fiscal impact. The General Fund will be reimbursed $32,690 for City staff services from the OSD fund for FY 1996-97. Attachments: A District Map B Estimate of Cost M:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\OSELMD2,DDS J '/--:.2 - --_._.~.._-_._- RESOLUTION NO. /%"21.,1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 FOR EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of this resolution, the City Council has caused the formation of various districts under and pursuant to either the Chula vista Open Space District Procedural Ordinance ("Procedural Ordinance"), as contained in Chapter 17.07 (adopting in substantial part the 1972 Lighting and Landscaping Act ("Act") as contained in Streets and Highways Code section 22500, et seq., or pursuant to the Act itself designated as Eastlake Maintenance District No. l' and , WHEREAS, in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance, the City Engineer has prepared a report on the spread of assessments for said Open Space and Maintenance Districts ("Engineer's Report") ; and, WHEREAS, on May 21, 1996, the City Council approved the Engineer's Report and set June 18, 1996 and July 16, 1996 as the dates for the pUblic hearings; and, WHEREAS, the proposed individual assessment for Eastlake Maintenance District 1 for Fiscal Year 1996-97 is shown below: TABLE 1 PRIOR FY'S VS. FY 96/97 ASSESSMENT/COLLECTIBLE OSD FY94/95 FY 95/96 FY 95/96 96/97 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY 95/96 Assmnt/ Collection/ Assmnt/ FY 95/96 FY 96/97 FY 96/97 Revenue EDU EDU EDU Assmnt + Assmnt/ Collection/ cpr(J) EDU(4) EDU ELMD #1(1) Eastlake r $9.32 $4.34 $9.32 $9.53 $9.53 $8.10 $190,000 Eastlake Greens 14.08 14.08 15.24 15.59 15.59 10.65 OTC 125.95 77.31 126.20 129.10 129.10 0.00 Salt Creek r 168.32 167.38 168.32 172.18 172.18 167.74 TC Channel(2) 6.16 16.74 24.00 24.55 24.55 15.95 (I) All areas share in the cost of Otay Lakes Road medians and off-site parkways. ~) Portions of Eastlake r BC and Eastlake Greens are in benefit area. (3) FY 96/97 assessment may be set at or below this cap without being subject to majority protest. (4) Does not reflect subsequent year cpr adjustments. /'1-..3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as to Eastlake Maintenance District No.1, that the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby find that written protests against the proposed assessment increase have not been made by owners representing more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvement and confirms the diagram and assessment contained in the modified Engineer's Report, and orders the open space and maintenance facilities to be maintained. The adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of the assessment as proposed in the modified Engineer's Report for the 1996-97 fiscal year and set forth hereinabove for Eastlake Maintenance District No.1. Presented by Approved as to form by C,c,,--- \.'1 1J{ ÂL~ ~ John P. Lippitt Ann Y. Moore --- Director of Public Works Interim City Attorney /¥ - t( - "...--......,....-- -_.__...._._--_._----~_. . .. - . I . --z . ... . .,' . O' Z . a . t .~ . _ f .'~ c ~ _..~ g .1,<1· Oo tJ ~. . ¡ iE z - ( ~·,I _ þ!f c:( !: ¡¡ :E u, . I· o "l . . h )'/-5 ---.... ---...... .. .... . . . . , . (~ASTLAKE MAINTENANCE 'DISTRICT NO.1. ct: . .. . city OF CMUL& YlltA 1- COUNTy OF IAN ÞEOØ.ITATI OF CAU'ORNIA : . l . . . . . \ ~. 0 . ~ J ,,'iI" ~JI ~~' . "j ........A~".; . ,'" r · " ì .. f II ( '\ \\ ; \~ J\ ZONE I ¡ . f=,f- 1\ _ " II: ~~_ ,~i5'¡¡¡~~ J --==::." ~~ I " \~ 1/ \\ ~ /,~ \~ ~ . . ,,'/ . ~ .' ~ . . I-.Ji. ~ ð . ,. . .- ~ . ~~ . ~ . ,/ M . ~ ~ ~ ~ '. ~ ?/ . ,~:::__~. ¡¡oo . --- -.., .. ,- ~ . "'" '. I :~_:"". . - .' . . - . . :' - . '. . l J'I:.-~ e - _M.......... -....... =............~..........- .. 1 -·._.T··'r·--·· . . . ..... ..,.l1r . --...,_1 JL~ .. - ... .f·. . · .- .. :'.' . . . M . , EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. J <C .' 1 , CITY ·or CMULA YIITA . , COUNTY OF IAN 01£00, IT ATE 'OF CAL"ClRNIA' . l' . ,'. - : , . fí!" ) , . . . / . ~ . ....... . .. , .' . . ( . . , ZONE . . . . . '. \ . -" ( . . , , I . Be...... -........... 1'/-1 ' ...................-- 1f..¿J. I ..... ra....f···· 'h -....... . . . .~..J - ..,.... . ~~ . . " um_.m_, ._.-._...-........-...... (\-t\e.c:'h~l"\t ~ ESTIMATE OF MAINTE NCE COSTS FY 96-97 . EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT . NUMBER 1 1996-1997 1995-1996 1994-1995 Personal Services Utilities $1,680.00 $85,560.00 $100,130.00 Trash Collection & Disposal 4,760.00 4,760.00 7,560.00 Water 93,624.00 Service to main bldg,struct,grds 600.00 760.00 0.00 City Staff Services 32,690.00 34,620.00 45,370.00 Contract Services 102,172.00 118,310.00 209,430.00 Landscape Supplies 1,990.00 2,420.00 4,970,00 Materials to main bldgs,struct. 4,884.00 5,820,00 9,500.00 Backflow Certification 1,480.00 Professional Services Supplementals Other commodities Advertising ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE C $242,400.00 $252,250.00 $378,440.00 Reserve Requirement Reserve Percent See Additional reserve budget Less Fund Balance' worksheet NET ASSESSMENT EDU'S CollectibleÆDU Percent change from prior years Collectible - even dollar Revenue from even $ payment Assessment Assessment with CPl 2.3% Budget/EDU Percent chan2e from orior years Protest: . ) t/ ... 'l'" F:\homelEnglneenOpenspac\960sd. wq1 613196 ~ "-':':: --_.~_..__. - --"'+ _._~- --"- - "---....-.. -.--- . At\Ae"....~t 'ß Eastloke MlintcDlnce District No. I FY 1996/97 BUDGET WORKSHEET , Overall Zone A Zone B ZoneC Zone D Zone E OLR Eut10ke 1 Greens OTC Salt Cnek TC Cwme TOTAL Bud8et 13,035 ",681 38,010 31,657 74,017 6,378 248,778 Reserve Req~ 13,035 55,693 20,906 15,829 29,607 ° 222,368 Special Reserve 5,284 ° ° 73,180 ° 8,836 87,300 Total Funds Req'd 31,354 141,374 58,916 120,666 103,624 15,214 471,146 Less alount ÌD reserve 24,638 40,270 16,800 31,325 24,169 8,836 t46,038 Less prior yr llvinp 4,071 9,746 228 25,.560 9,765 15 49,385 Less estimated IIVÌDp 1,790 8,800 4,210 61,.560 ° ° 76,360 Less estimated iD_ 855 2,860 1,2.55 2,220 2,100 210 9,.500 Subtotal 31,354 61,676 22,493 120,665 36,034 9,061 281,283 Net payment ° 79,698 36,423 I 67,590 6,153 I'Ir1iciplliD¡ ADTs 137,.585 98,380 34,205 5,000 4,234 387 FY 96/97 Net paymentlEDU 0.00 8.10 10.65 0.00 159.64 15.91 ..·...1,.';.)1· ÒI.. ..~- ,'.:. r).', ......., '" . 1,.1 I ~~: - ~ '" t . " ,-""I t ~ I " .~ ¡,V\lt t'...ì.1..:l i:.!....;;1:..:1.~... ,i~ " . ,>_12' ,¡I~',^-I~ . ,~~.¡: . "_ 'Jt;.,tl:~ . ., - ... .......:'0...11' FY 96/97 CostlEDU 0.95 8.71 11.11 63.3r 174.82 16.50 Asmt Asmt Asmt Payment P8YllleDt Asmt> FY 94/95 FY 95/96 FY 96/97 FY 95/96 FY 96/97 Payment Zone AIOLR 9.32 9.32 9.53 4.34 8.10 Yes Zone BIOLR 14.08 15.24 1",9 14.07 10.65 Yes Zone CIOLR 125.95 126.20 129.10 77.31 0.00 Yes Zone D/OLR 168.3'L 168.31. 172.18 167.38 167.74 Yes Zone E 6.16 24.00 24.55 16.70 15.95 Yes Notes: I. OLR shown as part of Zone A '" B 2. Bud8e! for OLR is for ELMDI only, bal.... is iD OSD 31 forFY 96/97 per N. Woods 3. FY 96/97 Zones A thru D ..d OLR share DPW staff (55500) 4. Zone E is not bud¡eted, renects 580 adjustment.... bud8e! liDe 5. Easdoke Greens'reserve is at 55%, Eut1lke I at 65%' 6. Zone DIOLR includes Zone A k 7. Zone C iDcludes merve ofS~ for infiltration basin. 8. Zone C . Relimd should be processed. M:\homeletl¡iDeeñopenspac\96eIsp.wql 613/96 1'1-7 ....-- -- -....-. ---...-- .-....~.._--------~..._._-- .~ ~cV.Å.JLcI turD I , 71IE em OF CHUU nsT.4 P.4RTY DISCLOSURE ST.4TEMENT . ~ ( O::ulIcment of discJosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contn'butions, on aD matters . ,hich w.ilI require discretiolW)' action on the part of the City CouncD, PIa""il1g Commf.qon, and' aU other official bodies. The following information mUlt be cfiscJOIed: '. 1. Ust the Dames or aD persons havinl a fiDanciaJ interest in the CODtÎ'act, Le.. contractor, 11J~:,~~~eriaJ supplier. ') If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnenJûp, Jilt the Dames of aD -. individuals owning more than 10% or the shares in the corporation or 0WDiD¡ BDy partnership interest in the partnership. . 3. If anÿ person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list"the lWDea. of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. . I. 4. Have you had more than S2S0 worth of business transacted with any member or the Oty staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Councll within the past twelve months? Yes_ No _ If yes, please indicate person(s): ~. Please identify each and eve!)' person, including any agents, employees, CODIUltaDtI or indepetldent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the Ci, in this matter. 6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the a¡¡repte, contributed more than 'SI,OOO to a CouncJJmember in the current or preceding election period? Yu_ No _ If JeI, state which Counci1member(s): lwwlll deßDed IS: ':ofll.)' itulilÑllllI~/f1m. ØÞ-,.. l>_IIa¥J, t¡/rII-.nør, .. ·....lot:ÜIIclllb,,.,...4I..... L ».,~ ",nlt. 1rV#. 1Iahwr. 'Yftdictu., tIIb 11II/I11II.)' t1lh".".".. dlyllll/l MIIIn)\ ciI)I ~ IIiIIrIa or __ poIitktlllllbdlllis/øQ, or /III)' ." þIp or rønbi1uJ1kIn «Iinf lIS .. 1l1ÚI." . . . . ~ (NOTE: AlIICII aclclJtIoul paps IS .~",y) ( Ie: Si¡nature of contractor/applicant I'!-It) Print or·type name of contractor !applicant . . 1·\,: 11.\:DISa.OSI!.'nI."T . fM_: II-I - - -r -- ---- -- ---- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ,- Item /3 Meeting Date 7/16/96 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Open Space Districts 2-9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18,20,23,24,26,31, Bay Boulevard, and Town Center for Fiscal Year 1996-97. Resolution IlJ"J716rdering certain open space and maintenance facilities to be maintained, approving modification to the Engineer's Report and levying the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996- 97 Open Space Districts 2-9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18,20,23,24,26,31, Bay Boulevard, and Town Center. ¿ SUBMITTED BY: D;,,,,,,,,fP,bl< Wo"''' ~ REVIEWED BY: ::OC:::j~ ~.ü -? (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX) In accordance with the City Municipal Code Section 17.07, the City Engineer prepared reports on the spread of assessments of the open space districts. The reports were accepted and the required public hearings were set by Council at its meeting of May 21, 1996. The first public hearing was conducted on June 18, 1996. This agenda statement includes information related to the above districts and general information related to Open Space Districts 1 and 10, and Eastlake Maintenance District No.1. RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1) Open the hearing, take testimony, close the hearing. 2) Direct staff to tally all protests. 3) Adopt the resolution to approve modifications to the Engineer's Report and levy the assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97. 4) Authorize staff to begin the process of determining assessments for Fiscal Year 1996/97. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The budget and assessment information for Town Center Maintenance District has been forwarded to the Town Center Committee via the Community Development Department. As the advisory committee for the Town Center developments, the Committee has historically reviewed this information and provided feedback to staff. DISCUSSION: This agenda statement is for the second and final public hearing on the levy of the annual assessments to provide for open space maintenance within the City. Table 1 contains the name and location of the districts. Table 2 relates the present year's assessment to the proposed assessment and collectible for FY 96/97. Following Table 2, there is some general information that applies to all the districts and then each district is analyzed individually. That is followed by a description of the noticing that is required an has been performed. As a final note, Council should be advised that the preceding agenda items contain the same information on Open Space District Nos. 1, 10, and Eastlake which were separated due to conflict of interest concerns. /.5"-/ - -..----- .___m_._" Page 2, Item Meeting Date 7/16/96 Back!!round Pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2 of the Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, also known as "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" and the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code, the City Engineer has prepared and filed the annual reports for all existing Open Space Districts in the City. The name and location of each open space district is shown in the following table. TABLE 1 Open Space Districts Within the City of Chula Vista Open Space District Name Location No. 2 Lark Haven South and east of Lorna Verde Park 3 Rancho Robinhood Units I & 2 South of Allen School Lane 4 Bonita Ridge Camino Elevado 5 Southbay Villas Northern end of Crest Drive 6 Hilltop Vista Camino Vista Road 7 Zenith Units 2, 3, and 4 North and south of Palomar, east of 1-805 8 Rancho Robinhood Unit 3 Surrey Drive 9 El Rancho del Rey Units Paseo del Rey, north of Telegraph Canyon Road 11 Hidden Vista Village East H Street, east of 1-805 14 Bonita Long Canyon North and south of Country Vistas Lane 15 Bonita Haciendas Canyon Drive, east of Otay Lakes Road 17 Bel Air ridge Northeast of Paseo Ladera and East J Street 18 Rancho del Sur Easterly end of East Naples Street 20 Rancho del Rey North of East H Street, west of Otay Lakes Road 23 Otay Rio Business Park West of Heritage/Otay Valley Road, south of Otay Rio Road 24 Canyon View Homes Rutgers Avenue, south of East H Street 26 Park Bonita West of the intersection of E Street and Bonita Road 31 Telegraph Canyon Estates North of Otay Lakes Rd, west of "SR 125" Town Center No. I Third Avenue, north and south of F Street Bay Boulevard - At last year's hearing, Council confirmed the assessments which included a CPI adjustment for subsequent years. Staff proposes for FY 1996/97 that the assessment be kept within that amount previously approved, increasing the FY 95/96 assessment by CPI. Per the City's Municipal Code, the CPI adjustment is the lesser of the January to January San Diego /ý .,2. --"..._- Page 3, Item Meeting Date 7/16/96 Metropolitan Area All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) or the change in the estimated California fourth quarter per capita personal income as contained in the Governor's budget published in January. CPI is estimated at 2.3% based on the San Diego Metropolitan Area and 2.89% based on the State of California. Therefore, staff will use the CPI figure of 2.3% based on the San Diego Metropolitan Area, which is the lesser of the two figures. Assessment increases equal to 2.3 % (CPI) are not subject to majority protest. Only assessment increases !II!:[ CPI are subject to majority protest. Assessments & Collectibles Ordinance 2631, adopted by Council last year, also made the distinction between the assessment and the amount that the City may collect against the assessment (collectible). The assessments for FY 96/97 are generally proposed at FY 95/96 amounts increased by the inflation factor (CPI) pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.07.035. The collectibles, on the other hand, are equal to or less than the proposed assessments based on the budget, reserve requirement, savings and fund balances, including interest earnings and prior years' savings. Under staff's recommendation, a total of two open space districts, OSD 1 and 15, would be subject to a majority protest on the increase (OSD 1 is discussed on separate agenda statement). The proposed assessments and collectibles for Fiscal Year 1996-97 are as follows: TABLE 2 PRIOR FY'S VS. FY 96/97 ASSESSMENT/COLLECTIBLE AND % CHANGE OSD 96/97 Proposed Proposed FY 94/95 FY 95/96 FY 95/96 CAP: FY 96/97 FY 96/97 FY 96/97 Assmnt/ Collection! Assmnt/ FY 95/96 Assmntl Collection! Revenue EDU EDU EDU Assmnt + EDU(6) EDU CPr(8) 2 $34.00 $30.00 $39.00 $39.90 $39.90 $34.00 $8,466 3 267.00 204.00 267.00 273.14 273.14 232.00 29,464 4 282.00 224.00 282.00 288.49 288.49 277.00 58,170 5 '243.00 229.00 275.00 281.33 281.33 275.00 33,550 6 136.00 0.00 136.00 139.13 139.13 65.00 10,530 7 95.00 39.00 95.00 97.19 97.19 90.00 9,360 8 430.00 300.00 434.00 443.98 443.98 441.00 48,510 9 101.00 93.00 123.00 125.83 125.83 123.00 47,232 II 83.00 74.00 84.00 85.93 85.93 85.00 112,288 14(2) 270.00 150.00 270.00 276.21 276.21 273.00 238,154 15 234.00 189.00 240.00 245.52 265.00(4) 265.00 15,105 17 124.00 0.00 124.00 126.85 126.85 1.00 46 18 293.00 234.00 293.00 299.74 299.74 228.00 88,361 20(5) 203.00(1) - - - - - 694,700 Zone I DB 36.67 0.00 45.28 46.32 46.32 0.00 (7) Zone 2 RC .19 0.00 3.44 3.52 3.52 1.01 (7) Zone 3 H 3.73 3.55 4.90 5.01 5.01 4.55 (1) Zone 4 BC 18.25 .78 18.25 18.67 18.67 11.00 (7) Zone 5 I 187.62 83.82 275.15 281.48 281.48 278.26 (7) Zone 6 II 0.00 211.41 211.41 216.27 216.27 209.12 (7) Zone 7 III 9.39 5.59 130.50 133.50 133.50 10.55 (7) Zone 8 NDB 0.00 0.00 30.09 30.78 30.78 0 (7) J.ÝJ ---.. ~.~_... Page 4, Item Meeting Date 7/16/96 OSD 96/97 Proposed Proposed FY 94/95 FY 95/96 FY 95/96 CAP: FY 96/97 FY 96/97 FY 96/97 Assmnt/ Collection! Assmnt/ FY 95/96 Assmnt/ Collection! Revenue EDU EDU EDU Assmnt + EDU(6) EDU CP¡(8) Zone 9 TCC 0.00 16.61 23.89 24.44 24 .44 16.02 (7) 23 335.00 205.00 335.00 342.71 342.71 63.00 3,519 24 432.00 341.00 502.00 513.55 513.55 377.00 15,080 26 394.00 356.00 394.00 403.06 403.06 302.00 5,738 31 407.00 0.00 407.00 416.36 416.36 262.00 90 ,495 33(3) NA NA NA NA 1029.00 686.00 12,348 Bay Blvd. 889.00 31.00 1291.00 1320.69 1320.69 1311.00 13,110 Town Centre 45.00 39.00 45.00 46.04 46.04 12.00 12,000 (1) Represented average residential assessment in SPA I. (2) Assumes Sweetwater Authority does not pay (pending agreement). (3) Per Resolution No. 18127, assessment and collectible set for FY 96/97 (first year assessment & 18 units). (4) Assessment increase is 6% ($19.48/EDU subject to majority protest). (S) Collectible adjusted for available figures. (6) Does not reflect subsequent year CP¡ adjustments. (7) Revenue for all zones included in overall District 20 amount. (8) FY 96/97 assessment may be set at or below this cap without being subject to a majority protest. In general, all budgets have increased due to adjustments in water cost (1.20%), contract services (I %),and City staff services (20 % ). The increase in water cost for most districts is based on water rate increases, and reflects historical use figures which have increased due to less rainfall. The increase in contract services is due to a CPI clause on contracts. The increase in City staff services for most districts is due to the addition of an open space inspector/maintenance worker as proposed in the 1996-97 Open Space budgets. Savings from prior years are proposed to be used to supplement the property owner collections to provide the revenue needed for FY 96/97 maintenance while maintaining reserves between 50%-65 % (City Code requires reserves between 50%-100%). Staff typically does not retain reserves above 65% in consideration of property owners direction to return as much excess funds as practical. For those districts where the reserve still exceeds 50-65 %, staff recommends using the savings to offset some of the assessments to give lower collectibles. This practice should help avoid reserves in excess of 100% in future years, thereby avoiding processing refund checks. Staff generally tries to keep the assessments within the CPI amount allowed by the Municipal Code each year. The following summarizes the major changes for each district. Pursuant to the ordinance, staff has made a distinction between the assessment and collectible amount; the assessment, estimated cost and collection will become the same number whenever an increase in assessment is necessary. The proposed assessment per EDU for FY 96/97 represents, in most cases, the prior year's assessment with an inflation factor of2.3%. The assessment per EDU is the figure mailed to the property owners and the collectible is the amount to be collected which is affected by reserves, savings, etc. The collectible per EDU reflects impacts of the reserve requirements, ending fund balances and savings. For a detailed outline, see Attachment A. 5{ Page 5, Item Meeting Date 7/16/96 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY 96-97 FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Revenue Assmtl Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collection! EDU EDU EDU CP1 EDU EDU I~SD No.2 $34.00 $30.00 $39.00 $39.90 $39.90 $34.00 $8,466 Lark Haven Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3% as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $34 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU), which is less than the assessment of $39.90, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $1,963 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmtl Collection Revenue EDU EDU EDU CPI EDU IEDU OSÚ No.3 $267.00 $204.00 $267.00 $273.14 $273.14 $232.00 $29,464 Rancho Robinhood Units I & 2 Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3% as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $232 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $273.14, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' saving and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $5,720 for City staff ser~ices from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmtl Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CPI EDU tion!EDU 10SD No.4 $282.00 $224.00 $282.00 $288.49 $288.49 $277.00 $58,170 Bonita Ridge Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $277 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $288.49 per EDU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' saving and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $9,092 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. /Ý -5*" Page 6, Item Meeting Date 7/16/96 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection/ Assmt/ Assmt + Assmtl Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU cpr EDU tion/EDU I~SD No.5 $243.00 $229.00 $275.00 $281.00 $281.00 $275.00 $33,550 Southbay Villas Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $275 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $281 per EOU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $5,494 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection/ Assmtl Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU cpr EDU tion!EDU I~SD NO.6 $136.00 $0.00 $136.00 $139.13 $139.13 $65.00 $10,530 Hilltop Vista Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPl of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $65 per EOU, which is less than the assessment of $139.13 per EOD, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 90%. The General Fund will be reimbursed $2,583 for City staff services from the Open Space ~istrict Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmtl Assmt + Assmtl Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CP1 EDU tion/EDU I~SD NO.7 - Zenith $95.00 $39.00 $95.00 $97.19 $97.19 $90.00 $9,360 Units 2, 3, & $ Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3% as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $90 per EOU, which is less than the assessment of $97.19 per EOU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $1,962 for City staff services from the Open Space ~istrict Fund for FY 1996-97. /5~ --..--.-.-.... -- -~.__._~._~.._-_.-....._.__.._.__._"_._---'" Page 7, Item Meeting Date 7/16/96 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CPl EDU tion!EDU OSD No.8 $430.00 $300.00 $434.00 $443.93 $443.93 $441.00 $48,510 Rancho Robinhood Unit 3 Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3% as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $441 per EDD, which is less than the assessment of $443.98 per EDD, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 53 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $8,000 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CPl EDU tion/EDU OSD No.9 $101.00 $93.00 $123.00 $125.83 $125.83 $123.00 $47,232 El Rancho del Rey Units Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3% as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $123 per EDD, which is less than the assessment of $125.83 per EDD, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' saving and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $7,819 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CP1 EDU tion!EDU I~SD No. 11 $83.00 $74 .00 $84.00 $85.93 $85.89 $85.00 $112,288 Hidden Vista Village Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staffrecommends a collectible of $85 per EDD, which is less than the assessment of $85.93 per EDD, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' saving and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 52 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $18,710 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. /5'l _.._.___._____m___~ ._. _........._. Page 8, Item Meeting Date 7 /16/96 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY9S-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CP1 EDU tion!EDU OSD No. 14 $270.00 $150.00 $270.00 $276.21 $276.21 $273.00 $238,154 Bonita Long Canyon Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a cpr of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $273 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $276.21 per EDU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' saving and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 63 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $36,998 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. Sweetwater Authority owns a residential lot for future construction of a water tank within OSD 14. The above mentioned assessment assumes Sweetwater Authority does not pay (pending agreement per Resolution 17957). CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY9S-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU cpr EDU(I) tion!EDU OSD No. IS $234.00 $189.00 $240.00 $245.52 $265.00 $265.00 $15,105 Bonita Haciendas (I) Assessment increase is 6% ($19.48/EDU subject to a majority protest). Staff recommends an increase in the assessment from $240 to $265 per ED U to reflect the estimated cost and funds needed for FY 96/97. This represents a $25 per EDU increase. Staff also recommends a collectible of $265 per EDU, which equals the proposed assessment. An increase in assessment is recommended due to increased water costs, City staff services and contractual services for the district. The reserve under this recommendation will be 50 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $2,832 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. The increase above cpr, equaling $19.48/EDU ($1,110 total revenue), is subject to a majority protest. Should this occur, there will be a shortfall of funds unless Council reduces the budget or the reserves are reduced below 50 %. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CPl EDU tion!EDU 10SD No. 17 $124.00 $0.00 $124.00 $126.00 $126.00 $1.00 $46 Bel Air Ridge Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a cpr of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends minimal collection and utilizing the fund balance for all maintenance. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' saving and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 100 %, the maximum allowed under the City Ordinance. Alternatively, refunds could be processed to lower the reserve below 100%. Staff recommends against this alternative as it is costly to process refunds. The General Fund will be reimbursed $1,082 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. 15.,8'" , ---- Page 9, Item Meeting Date 7/16/96 Staff recormnends collection amounts of at least a minimal amount ($I/EDU) to ensure that the Open Space District collectible is on the tax bill serving as additional disclosure to property owners. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU cpr EDU tion!EDU 10SD No. 18 $293.00 $234.00 $293.00 $299.74 $299.74 $228.00 $88,361 Rancho del Sur Staff recormnends that the assessment remain the sarne as FY 95/96 plus a cpr of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staffrecormnends a collectible of $228 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $299.74 per EDU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $16,510 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY 94/95 FY 95/96 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY 96/97 FY 96/97 FY 96/97 AssmntlEDU Collection/ Assmnt/ Assmt + cpr AssmntlEDU Collection! Revenue EDU EDU EDU OSD No. 20 - - - - - - 694,700 Rancho del Rey Zone I - Desilt 36.67 0.00 45.28 46.32 46.32 0 Basin Zone 2 - Rice Can- .19 0.00 3.44 3.52 3.52 1.01 yon Zone3-HSt. 3.73 3.55 4.90 5.01 5.01 4.55 Zone 4 - Business 18.25 .78 18.25 18.67 18.67 11.00 Center Zone 5 - SPA 1 187.62 83.82 275.15 281.48 281.48 278.26 Zone 6 - SPA II 0.00 211.41 211.41 216.27 216.27 209.12 Zone 7 - SPA 111 9.39 5.59 130.50 133.50 133.50 10.55 Zone 8 - North 0.00 0.00 30.09 30.78 30.78 0 Desilting Basin Zone 9 - Telegraph 0.00 16.61 23.89 24.44 24.44 16.02 Canvon Channel Rancho del Rey is a phased development of three Sectional Planning Areas (SPA). SPA 1 is approximately 50% developed, SPA II and SPA III homes are under construction. The OSD was established in 1989 encompassing all three areas with the understanding that the open space improvements would be constructed in phases. Because this is a large district and not all of the items to be maintained have a benefit to the entire district, OSD 20 is made up of several zones as indicated above. Every property within the district is in more than one zone. /.>~ ··T· n ___"._____"...__.~_ Page 10, Item Meeting Date 7/16/96 TABLE 3 Typical Combined Assessment (FY 96-97) SPA I (Zones 1 or 8, 2, 3, & 5) $305 SPA II (Zones 1 or 8, 2, 3, & 6) $271 SPA III (Zones 1 or 9, 3, & 7) $147 Business Center (Zones 1, 2, 3, & 4) -- Industrial (per acre) $833 Commercial (per acre) $1028 Staff recommends that the assessments remain the same for each zone as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. In each of these zones, staff recommends a collectible which is less than the proposed assessment. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. Also, the improvements are being constructed in phases and not all phases are anticipated to be turned over to the City for maintenance during FY 96/97. Pursuant to City Municipal Code, the reserve will be increased to 50% (minimum) over 5 years. The General Fund will be reimbursed $89,581 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmtl Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CPl EDU tion!EDU OSD No. 23 - Otay $335.00 $265.00 $335.00 $342.71 $342.71 $63.00 $3,519 Rio Business Park Staffrecommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staffrecommends a collectible of $63 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $342.71 per EDU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings due to delayed turnover of improvements and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $2,255 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CP1 EDU tion!EDU OSD No. 24 $432.00 $341.00 $502.00 $513.55 $513.55 $377.00 $15,080 Canyon View Homes Note: OSD 24 consists of only 40 townhomes sharing in the cost of large, landscaped slopes adjacent to the townhomes. Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a CPI of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $377 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $513.55 per EDU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' saving and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $3,343 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. /.5>JCJ ---~_.__._..._~-"-- Page 11, Item Meeting Date 7 /16/96 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CPl EDU tion!EDU 10SD No. 26 $394.00 $356.00 $394.00 $403.06 $403.06 $302.00 $5,738 Park Bonita Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a cpr of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $302 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $403.06 per EDU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $1,461 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CPl EDU tionlEDU OSD No. 31 $407.00 $0.00 $407.00 $416.36 $416.36 $262.00 $90,495 Telegraph Canyon Estates Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a cpr of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $262 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $416.36 per EDU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of saving from prior years and turnover of improvements did not occur. The reserve under this recommendation will be 10 %, and will increase to 50% over five years pursuant to Municipal Code. The General Fund will be reimbursed $13,047 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection/ Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CP1 EDU tion!EDU Bay Boulevard Open $889.00 $31.00 $1,291.00 $1,320.69 $1,320.69 $1,311.00 $13,110 Space Maintenance District Note: Costs of this district are shared between four commercial properties. Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a cpr of 2.3 % as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $1,311 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $1,320.69 per EDU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years' saving and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 61 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $8,129 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. IS"il Page 12, Item Meeting Date 7 /16/96 CAP: Proposed Proposed FY94-95 FY 95/96 FY95-96 FY95-96 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 FY 96-97 Assmt/ Collection! Assmt/ Assmt + Assmt/ Collec- Revenue EDU EDU EDU CP1 EDU tion!EDU Town Center Open $45.00 $39.00 $45.00 $46.04 $46.04 $12.00 $1,000 Space Maintenance District Note: Methodology spread based on 'h of the valuation and '/, the front footage. Staff recommends that the assessment remain the same as FY 95/96 plus a cpr of 2.3% as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. However, staff recommends a collectible of $12 per EDU, which is less than the assessment of $46.04 per EDU, utilizing the fund balance to make up the difference. Funds are available to do this because of prior years savings and by adjusting the reserve balance. The reserve under this recommendation will be 65 %. The General Fund will be reimbursed $20,977 for City staff services from the Open Space District Fund for FY 1996-97. ~ The public hearings were noticed pursuant to Government Code 6063 which requires that notice be published at least once a week for three weeks 10 days before the second public hearing. OSD's I and 15, proposed for assessment increases above the range previously noticed, have more stringent notice requirements. Staff has mailed notice of the hearings to all open space districts. The notice has informed the resident of his/her district, the current year assessment, the cpr adjustment and the proposed assessment for FY 96/97. The 2 districts (OSD I & 15) which are proposed for assessment increases, were notified that any increase in assessment above the cpr adjustment may be overruled by a majority protest. The Parks and Recreation Department has conducted information meetings for all property owners within each district in June. At the meeting, staff explained the proposed budget to interested owners (approximately 10,000 properties received notice). Plans, specifications, and assessment roll are on file in the Public Works/Engineering office. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff costs associated with the open space program are generated by Parks and Recreation, Public Works, and Data Processing. Contractual costs ($828,000) are outlined in Attachment A. These costs are recovered through the Open Space District collectible, causing no net fiscal impact. The total General Fund reimbursement for City staff service.s from the above listed Open Space District Funds for FY 1996-97 is estimated to be $257,500. Attachments: A Cost Summary B District Maps C Protests M:\HOME\ENGlNEER\AGENDA\OSROIPH2.DDS /..5"/~ .. ...._____ .."___m"·_ RESOLUTION NO. /&'370 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED, APPROVING MODIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, AND LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 FOR OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 2-9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 31; BAY BOULEVARD, AND TOWN CENTRE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of this resolution, the City Council has caused the formation of various districts under and pursuant to either the Chula vista Open Space District Procedural Ordinance ("Procedural Ordinance"), as contained in Chapter 17.07 (adopting in substantial part the 1972 Lighting and Landscaping Act ("Act") as contained in streets and Highways Code section 22500, et seq., or pursuant to the Act itself designated as follows: 1. Open Space District Nos. 2-9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 26 and 31. 2. Bay Boulevard and Town Centre Maintenance Districts. WHEREAS, in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance, the city Engineer has prepared a report on the spread of assessments for séÜd Open Space and Maintenance Districts ("Engineer's Report"); and, WHEREAS, on May 21, 1996, the city Council approved the Engineer's Reports and set June 18 and July 16, 1996 as the dates for the public hearings; and, WHEREAS, the proposed individual assessments for Fiscal Year 1996-97 as they compare to the last year are shown below: TABLE 2 PRIOR FY'S VS. FY 96/97 ASSESSMENT/COLLECTIBLE AND % CHANGE OSD 96/97 Proposed Proposed FY 94/95 FY 95/96 FY 95/96 CAP: FY 96/97 FY 96/97 FY 96/97 Assmnt/ Collection/ Assmnt/ FY 95/96 Assmnt/ Collection/ Revenue EDU' EDU EDU Assmnt + EDU(6) EDU CP1(~ 2 $34.00 $30.00 $39.00 $39.90 $39.90 $34.00 $8,466 3 267.00 204.00 267.00 273.14 273.14 232.00 29,464 J5'~J.:J OSD 96/97 Proposed Proposed FY 94/95 FY 95/96 FY 95/96 CAP: FY 96/97 FY 96/97 FY 96/97 Assrnnt/ Collection/ Assrnnt/ FY 95/96 Assrnnt/ Collection/ Revenue EDU EDU EDU Assrnnt + EDU(~ EDU cpr(') 4 282.00 224.00 282.00 288.49 288.49 277.00 58,170 5 243.00 229.00 275.00 281.33 281.33 275.00 33,550 6 136.00 0.00 136.00 139.13 139.13 65.00 10,530 7 95.00 39.00 95.00 97.19 97.19 90.00 9,360 8 430.00 300.00 434.00 443.98 443.98 441. 00 48,510 9 101.00 93.00 123.00 125.83 125.83 123.00 47,232 11 83.00 74.00 84.00 85.93 85.93 85.00 112,288 14(2) 270.00 150.00 270.00 276.21 276.21 273.00 238,154 15 234.00 189.00 240.00 245.52 265.00(4) 265.00 15,105 17 124.00 0.00 124.00 126.85 126.85 1.00 46 18 293.00 234.00 293.00 299.74 299.74 228.00 88,361 20<') 203.00'1) - - - - - 694,700 Zone 1 DB 36.67 0.00 45.28 46.32 46.32 0.00 m Zone 2 RC .19 0.00 3.44 3.52 3.52 1.01 m Zone 3 H 3.73 3.55 4.90 5.01 5.01 4.55 (7) 'Zone 4 BC 18.25 .78 18.25 18.67 18.67 11.00 (7) Zone 5 I 187.62 83.82 275.15 281.48 281.48 278.26 (7) Zone 6 II 0.00 211.41 211.41 216.27 216.27 209.12 (7) Zone 7 III 9.39 5.59 130.50 133.50 133.50 10.55 (7) Zone 8 NDB 0.00 0.00 30.09 30.78 30.78 0 (7) Zone 9 TCC 0.00 16.61 23.89 24.44 24.44 16.02 m 23 335.00 205.00 335.00 342.71 342.71 63.00 3,519 24 432.00 341.00 502.00 513.55 513.55 377.00 15,080 26 394.00 356.00 394.00 403.06 403.06 302.00 5,738 31 407.00 0.00 407.00 416.36 416.36 262.00 90,495 33(3) NA NA NA NA 1029.00 686.00 12,348 Bay Blvd. 889.00 31.00 1291.00 1320.69 1320.69 1311.00 13,110 Town Centre 45.00 39.00 45.00 46.04 46.04 12.00 12,000 (I) Represented average residential assessment in SPA I. (2) Assumes Sweetwater Authority does not pay (pending agreement). ß) Per Resolution No. 18127, assessment and collectible set for FY 96/97 (first year assessment & 18 units). (4) Assessment increase is 6% ($19.48IEDU subject to majority protest). (') Collectible adjusted for available figures. (~ Does not reflect subsequent year cpr adjustments. (7) .Revenue for all zones included in overall District 20 amouot. (II) FY 96/97 assessment may be set at or below this cap without being subject to a majority protest. )yl'/ .....-..-.- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as to all Open Space and Maintenance Districts herein referenced that the City Council of th,e City of Chula vista does hereby find that written protests against the proposed assessment increase have not been made by owners representing more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed from the improvement and confirms the diagram and assessment contained in the modified Engineer's Report, and orders the open space and maintenance facilities to be maintained. The adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of the assessments as proposed in the modified Engineer's Report for the 1996-97 fiscal year and set forth hereinabove for Open Space Districts 2-9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 31, Bay Boulevard and Town Centre Maintenance Districts. Presented by Approved as to form by (\^- \.--t ~~ John P. Lippitt, Director of Ann Y. Moor, Inter1m C1ty Public Works Attorney C:\rs\OsLevy.all /5'''/;5' ~ ~ ,S- 601 Diamond Dr. Chula Vista, CA 91911 July 14, 1996 city of Chula Vista City Clerk 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear City Clerk: We would like to express our opposition to the increase in our property taxes, pertaining to the open space (OSD #18), in back of our property. We feel that there is no real need for this increase for the city does very little maintenance. We see the gardeners going to this area at the most once a month, and we have had to trim the iceplant which comes from the city-maintained open space into our property. (The gardeners should notice that this iceplant is growing into my property.) In the above mentioned open space, there have been incidents of vandalism as well as cars parking with people drinking and smoking marijuana. We believe other illegal activities have also taken place in this area. We spoke with the supervisor of the Parks and Recreation Department, Mr. Jerry Fonsagrada, and requested that a chain link be placed at the entrance on Foxboro street. We have yet to receive a response from him or from anyone else in the city. Due to the improper maintenance in the area and to the inability of the city to keep people and cars from going into the open space in the neighborhood to vandalize property and engage in other improper activities, we oppose any increase to our property taxes. Sincerely, ~~ig"e' a /!ldz - Alfredo RO~ ljUU{;e'LTle'f] _l:~~.L'Jeln..~ UL LCl" ;:)un now I.fteV" H'pnrerrc. nT=':r--"'."T»~~-'--- ---.- nn___. Chula Vista, CA 91911 July 12, 1991) City of Chula Vista Attn: City Clerk 271) Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear City Clerk: We, the undersif':nerJ, re sidents of Sun bow deve lopment, do here b,y, jointly express our strong opposition to any proposed increase in our property taxes that which pertains to open space maintainance by the city of Chula Vista. We feel that the ODen space areas has not been kept up oroperly and there is no real need for tax increase. As it is, our property taxes including mello-roos and o~n space maintenance assessment added altogether are considered as extremely hif':h by any standarrJ. So we do not think it is necessary to pay more at this time. Decrease - Yes In crease - No Sincerely, Concerned residents of the sun bow development, signatures as follows: IIflII!iSIGNATURE AD~SS 1 .nn__~QL· '//1I:I¿JU~ f) r, I ('. I/. 2 nnnÇ"e0\~ n ~_D,,¡-~, J . ,-:Jr C'-J. .Li. '..:D, ., I', , . "' ~_n_._-L ·ní.~llllJ..if4l4;,-'-n I.' ¡'iT 'if' / :; /" L¡ /í-f '\1,);ß~r; IV '11'111 , t. .Ih- /9 7 ~ on c; --- 1n 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19, 20 2L 22, 2), I 24. 251.... ; 26 '" ~ ~O";, "" ~f/t 27, 28. /~~ '~y~ ~:~. I~~ 29. (¿, 9!). 1.ß;~':;<»'~ e;[ ~ f'!~ ; ('1\) ~ I ?/~ 30, 31. 32. 33. 34. 35~ 36, 37.---- - - ~ ~C1-f..A.J2 ( :il) ç i 8 88888 ~ ~ ! ¡ ~ ~~~~~ ... . i. N fò i ...:!! on - " ...- ¡;;; Q if 8 88888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ !¡ ä~~~ It ii 8~s!~8 i a~~~E ~ ä~"ä ~fò - ~~N ... ..; . ..r. "" B- ¡;;; Q a QU ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ä¡ ~ ~~ g~ - "'~~~Sl ~ s~~~i - ã- Ð ä ~ ! ~ (:!.~.N on... ~ - - Q" Q î 8 ~~~~~ 8 ~ èJ ~ ~ 0 '" . i ~~¡i¡ ... ... ~ on N Q 0l\C..~ t"') "': ..r -... - .. ¡;;; .. if 8 88888 8 8~888 ~ ~~ ~~ "'~~~ i~ ~ S¡~¡ii¡ . ·..··N '" .- Q... Q..- !i S!g~$...;:!i tì' . "'''', NW\f'I')t"') ~ . 2"': ~ QQ ti ...:"" 8: '" ... .. .. ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ a~ ~ :~ ~ i esi f"'I f'I"ICf'l"l_....= ... ~. 8'" ... ~ .!ì N ~~ ~ ~...~f;;::::~ ~ ~~ ~~ N M = ~ j t: .. .. .... N -on 2 ~ == .. 'SiS î 88 88888 8 è!i ~ fð : -( co ~s!ii~g o ~ . 5 ~ - .. õõ ... ~ t ~ I .... N ~c..O\ ..'""' ;::¡ ...... - ..: N '" I .I! .. .. - if 88 88888 ~ ~~~~~ : ~~ SS iaè!i~ . r I~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ :::!... 8i ~ :¡' oñ ¡ hI ] I I;¡ eO r--"r-: ...: ~ ~W\ ~... :¿ ¡;;; N :¡ Q :¡¡:¡ i B ~ ~~ ~~ : ~~ ¡~ ; ~~ ~ ~i 888888 8 II- In § !j~~~:S:= 0 ~ onM 8~ ~ i . ¡ I~ W\ f""L to..... ~ _ ~... :¡... :R ~i SBB I M 0\ 0\"; ..: ! eO ~ .. - .., " Q.. I v i JII ~ 11~ ï ~ · .Ji· I J ~ J t- 6! I H HiJU' 1 ~ j II I! J t j msnJUdÎ~f ·~ild i f IJ Hi! I : ..: - . f)-I s: 8 ~~~~~ 8 8 ~ 2 ~ coooc ! :èi ,.; ,.; .J SM-OON - .... . 00 M f"'-_ ¡;;; ¡;;; ~ ~~ å ¡- i~ 8 88888 8 8~888 ~ ~~ aa :s::a~ ~ gggg~ - . .~ ~ ~~c~~ :! M=&I C _lICf'I"Ir--_ :;i ...roñ ..... .... ... t: - ;; ;:; :;: ~ a8888888 8 8~888 8 Sl! !Ie> ... ~~ I~ .... - 8'¡~d;;;=i i ¢~c~~ ~ ¡ ~ ,¡ i N --;:s.r--"",,.... . "l . ¡;;; - .... . ... ~ '" '" ""It f'""I r--c ;; ¡;; ;;¡;; s: 8 88888 ~ 8 :::! :I: g 8g~8~ ¡ N ,.; ,..: ~ :::! ;i!i .... "l -:.V1.00.oo- .. :;: .. .2: ..; ... ... ¡;¡ ~ ¡~ 8 88888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ 0'\110 IIf"¡f'I"IN~ Nf'I"i r--""'.....N i~ ~ g::~8~ i: 1If"¡. C 0'1 \CI ~ ¡;:~ u...:~ ""L ~:;g ~:.. - .... ..~ "1."1.0'-00- :;: :;:... .. .'" ""It N 00 r-- ... ... - M N NN .... ..tilt t: a8 888888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ::::~ ~c "" ...."if. ~¡ ....Z{ ""I "'.... g o~:MÇ8 ..... ! ~ ::¡ce>§:8 .... â Ma ã ~i ¡;;; ::t- ._18_",.. .... f'oo..1If"¡ .. "1. - 00 1If"¡~ '" .... "'.... .... ¡;;; -.... ... ...... s: 8 88888 8 8 : .. c .... ~ !~!~~ ~ g v; .i ¡::¡ .. '" :;: :;: oñ ~.,;,,: <> ¡;;; .... '" ¡- ... i~ 8 88888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ...."if. "'0 go..O\~ "'1- a~ :;:"':"'1. g ~..~ª..~ i o r- .o_~ _ .~ ,...... =~ ~ ~:;: ~.. N a ~ ........ ¡ t: ~ ..; ...."'- - - -..... ...... ¡;;; .... '" .... ~~ ..- ... ... r. e3¡ 8 888888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ E~ , ~~ § I- E !~~~~~ f'I"I .. .cgf'oo - J:i i Øã 00 t"'-1If"¡ :J. N ~ .. ").>0 ~ I "''''- § '" ... - .... ~ ~:.; .. ~ u i J t I ~ I i "if. 1 i i J! ::¡-l ~ · JJI!ljR J i I)ul ¡... fi I :>J II ,¡¡ J J j r 1!!sl]1 ~ it.J j:>f .. ð s ~ 11 j] ;r ~ IJI~~ ~ ~ j I J J Iii . J~J!jsJ ~ Jul J p-;).. - í 88 88888 8 ~ i f;¡ ~! ~~~~.~ C : ..: ,.: ~i ... ... 2 ... 1W\c:p,.-- ~ ... ¡;; - ... i- ... ;~ ~~ !II!.~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ¡~a~~~ ~~ ~NO=' ... 5 ~ ...~~ B! .,;.: ~~ ~~ ...-- !:--. ! c ~ M MM ¡;; ~ .,.~ ~ 88888888 8 8~888 ~ ~~ ~N ~ 2~ ~! $!~~~§~~ ø ß~c8S ~ ~... ¡;;~ ~ ~ ~ ~..:ct ":ô":-" .: ~~ ~~ M : A M _ N :¡ ~ ~~ î 8 88888 ~ ~ ~ !ì g ¡¿g~s::~ 0 ! - ~ ~i tt"I.....rf\f""¡ - ~ tñô ¡;; ... ~ i- i~ 8 88888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~§ ~~~~ ~ ~$¡¡jS;¡¡¡j o ".O...¡ - 8' ... ~"'! _ _~ rf\ _ f""¡ ¡ "i."':."-f""I"'" ~ ~IW\ ~~ :;: ~ B8: ~c ¡;; ... ~ a ~~ ~- 8 888888 ~ ~,~~~ ~ ~~ i2 ~ ~, ~~ 8 ":C§N¡:jC - IW\ .C8~ - -.. ~ i f""¡ _N "" tn ~ "... ... - ~ ~ ! ~ M ....t"") c....f"'I ;.. ~IW\ ~:r : M Ñ oô': - ... :¡ a :;¡~ î 8 88888 8 ~ ~ ... "I !2 ~~.a ~ ~ ~ ! ~ .. - - ~ - --:t "I ~ ¡;; ~ - .. ¡- ¡;; i~ 8 88888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ¡~~~ C ~~a~~ :it ~ .ON'" ~ . . ¡¡. ¡ ¡:::. "'!. ~ ~.a. -:;¡ ~ B~ :;¡ -... ~ ~ =~ .. ~ ~ 8 888888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ !~ ~ ~~ § ~! C ~UN":":~ ~ :i:¡:::::I ~ §~c~~ _ 1_ ~ ¡ ª I i M ... ..... g å ~~ ... ... -... I - .. u ~ Iii i lId r ~ I · ¡IIi1II t I IJIII I! i) ~! I Jil!ilJIIJllIf ~ JJII; ¡ f II I II J . ..: f)-3 . 8 88888 8 '" ", ~ g: ... ..; ... ~ ¡gg~¡ ~ .... o· oo .ï oo .... a ..; "'l").-. ."l t:! -- = ~EfPI""- a ~ i~ 8 88888 8 8~888 ~ IZ~ o~ o-s~ ! ~gg~¡ . 'r--'" f'I"I ~,. ::. a:; ¡::.,. ¡ !:;,..¡o::¡:! .... 00- .... 0..")._.. ..f'1. .. ,.....10 "1... - ;; ... t:!t:! B~ ~ ~f"H"''''''_ :;;;; ~:õI ;; ... - t:! ;; t:!;; òj 8 888888 ~ ~~~~~ ª i!~ ¡:!~ - ~~ I~ ~ ,.:¡....;...~ ... \0 '°18 ~- :;¡-:. :J 5 _ ~"l~~;. oo ", ... oo .... ~ - \Ø-~"'f'O"I"" -.. ~\O ..11IO... t:! a :;¡ M r- :! ~ \0 t:ã ... - - 00 00 00 g: 88 88888 8 !:! oo .. ", ;:! 00 C=cio~ ~ ;::¡ ¡ _ï on .. S.r:::~ :::: = "'... "l <:i N'""," M ", ... -'" - -- 00 ;; ~~ 88 88888 8 8~888 !:! ...~ t;·ìß æ~~~ "'- h gg ooo~~ ~ !:!o~~ Ñ ."": . ",.... 1;-- £; ¡ == "'... .. .... 0.. -:."" ""ì."1. ~ .. .",¡r: M 1In,... 100 ... -'" = ~ f; B- oo 00 , 88888888 8 ~~ 88 !:! "'~ ï=! ~ ~~ - .. ~~ ic::i"'¡c:iC~"':o :;:j '" . is Ñ ~- ¡- ~~~r::~r::~ _ ... oo 0'" on ... - 1:1I 0' ",,;.,.; M oô ro:- .. - ;; ~ ...... ... -.... ~ ~ == 00 00 8 88888 8 .... oo .... g: ... 0 - '"! g i~¡g8 0 :CI ~ .... !!ï "l ~""ì.""'I'f')N Õ = '" "'- ..; : ;; ... ~ i- i~ I 88888 ~ ~,~~~ :;¡ ~~ -\0 fPI_fPl'#. ¡;;~ =~~~ ~:;¡¡gg ~ ~...o~~ f'I"I tt ¡ æ= t .........""N ... 0"" \0 \Ø ¡ ... o,Ó"': ~ ~ ~¡ g- ;; ... 00 t:I 00 Ii: e¡ ~ 888888 ~ ~~~~~ :;¡ .t ¡~ i ...~ I~ "}... § i ;;8";:j~g - W'lo::olf'l"l fPI ¡- .... r-- tn f'I"I \Ø 1:1I ~ ;; r--N~\Ø""fPI -::¡'''' oo ~ I . " . ".. ... oo - 5 ta g:;; - ... III I u i ! J J le I 1 I ~ 1 l.. ;:¡-l I!; Ilul ¡M 5 i II '9l§lU~ ! ~{II t J . - ~ SO]Jl" ~ ~i.J ~f ] ~ î! j I J II j ~!~ J ~ Jjt~i ~ jj II Iii) J : ..: fJ-4 ~ 8888 8 ", .. - í "! ... ~ 5 csi~8 ~ ~ ..; .i !:!."l '"i ... ... ...... - ¡;¡ g ¡;¡ ¡;¡ -... -- ;; ¡ ~ 8888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ q~ ãi ä~~~ i~ ~ ~~.~~ ~ ~~oll ... ã' t ~8' i ... ~s - ¡;¡ e- ... n 8 8 8888 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ D~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ sit!~8 ~ ~~o§~ ... ã .. ~ g ~ ~ ~~ ~ ª Ë ¡! = M ,... _ \0 .. I í ~ 8888 8 ~ ¡!: ~ ~c~8 J '" . ~i rz: ...:1"'- ... ;!i ... ", - - '1 .. ... ¡- " ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ aa ~~~~ ~ i~ 8 8888 i g !C~8 ~ ~~s~a a~ ...~~ š: ", CI:.'" - ... ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ,... MM ...... - e- ... I ~i 8 8888 8 8~888 ~ ~2 ;;! ~ .~ ~~ g d~~8 ~ ~8~i5 ~ ; i É~ ", ~~""- I ~ ~-..;~ ... .. š: 8 ~~~~~ 8 ~ <!i - ~ ~ ... . "I ~s;8!i:;¡ ", ... ã ::i _ ""'N_ t: ~ .....; ... ¡- ;; i~ 8 88888 ~ 8f~~~ ~ ~~ !~ ~q~l ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~c~~ "" I' "ô Q~~ .. ~"" ~.. ¡;; ;; :::::£1 ¡ e!: ~ N'" ... = -0 i ¡;; ;:;;:; < ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ !~ ¡ ~~ t !:Ii a8 888888 s § ~~ ~ .nQN'=~O ~ ~~c~_ "" ~ ~ -- I _ z~~s ~ ~ ~ ~~ g - 5 I tilt .¿ Ñr-:' :! = =~ tilt ... ... I I.> i I I i I·· I ~ ~ i UhUlmllÎf ~ Hn! ~ IIIJ HlI J u: /J-5 î 88 88888 8 8 8 :q ~~ c:ic:i~c:ig c:i c:i â . ~ ~i ....... .., ... -"'1. eo_ - .... = ...... ¡;¡ .. ~ 8 8~ 8 ,,~ -! S!"'8~ i~ 88 88888 8 co ~~~~! . .'" ~ ¡ ;~ æ "1.. I ï::i .. .. f'I':I ..... ~~ ... -- ... - ....... = ...... eS . ... .. .. .. .. t:j!: a a ¡;¡ ; 88888888 ~ ~~~~~ ¡ ..."1- ::C ... ~~ ~~ <')- ::i= "1 igig~";i~ 0-. ~viC8¡ ::- . ... :g ¡;¡.... .- "l~. .. ::t -:.'" "l. ... - ... ...... C "'" _1In :;¡ ¡;¡ ;:¡ ;:¡ N _ __ - .. .. .. .. î 88 88888 8 8 Iè ~ cd ~g5!~i ~ .,; on :So ... ~i - .. ... "'.... ........ ... :;¡ ..; Ñ~ ,.: .. .. ¡;¡ ~- i~ 88 88888 8 8~888 ~ !:!~ !\CI V\_"", f'I':I f'I':I.......... ¡2g ig:è:!~ . . \C . " \CI "';7 t;:tVl ~ÑOÔI II:> i .OOO~ V'I .... ..... ti = ~Ñ "I.... OCI..~N :::I- .. "l"l .. .. .. t:jg: ~ -. - ~ ~= ...- .. .. es 88888888 ~ ~§~~~ ~ $¡; i'" - ..1fI. U - ... ...... ~o~o"'...;o~ ÑI"¡' ... . ..= 1; ~.nC8~ IIn . .... M~:S"'~¡:::Ñ ~ ... . .... ~ IIn _\0 t'1.... .. .., ¡;¡ .. Ñ. ~:£ t:t1 .. .. .. î 88 88888 8 ~~ :2g~:2g g i ....."').-......."'" :;¡. ....- :00... å --- .. !I- .... ;:¡ ~~ 88 88888 8 8~ h ~g g~$\~~ o ...c~ ~ ....c ... ..... ..tf\~..... .. \0..... \ÓÑ :i¡~;:::¡ ¡ .. .... 5 ¡;¡ .., ¡ t:j ;8: 88888888 8 r. g8~g;:!oci~ .,; § ~~ 1"-.. 00 "'1...... "). -:. st "':. 5 ~¡t IIII"IN',... :"""\0_ I M ~ ~_N ¡¡¡ U OJ I \J t I t JiI ¡ i t ~ I ~. I!; I)ul j 1i 5 j i I j 1]jfi~ . ;f 'I ':>} UhiUUillh I OJ j j t l~ IJ ÎJ ]11) , ~ J . û: p-(p î gg g ggg I!¡ I!¡ ~ I!¡ .g !!¡g ~ ~ci:;:¡ i ==: - i .. - I"" _~_ ~. i "!.~ - "1 Q .. ~ ;; - - .. !II I!¡ I!¡ g gg g I!¡ I!¡ I!¡~I!¡I!¡I!¡ ~ I!¡~ aã ~~I!¡~ i~! ~ ~o ~ i S 8-°1: - a' _~s 110 .;:J - - .. ..\0 ..¡;; Mff').f"L Q ,.: .' ~ = ~ MM .. .. ~ ggggg gg I!¡ I!¡ I!¡~ I!¡I!¡ ~ ~~ =: ~ ~~ ~~~ ...:v\~c;o\ de i ¡ ø.. gt - ==:- ~M ~ $ 1...:8........ "'::1 ..~ ... __ 00 - .. "'l."" eI!.-.. ").... M_ "l Ñ .. ~ = =~ - .. - - M M" .. M fî g ggggg g I!¡ :Ii ¡¡ 8 ~cici~ci ~ ~ ! ;i f~ -.... - '" ~ .. ;; ;:;~ g ggggg I!¡g .g~gg~ I!¡ ~! aa i~~~ ii ~ ~~!~.~ ~~ aci~~i ~ u~ ~~ ~ -~ ~"l. - : ,,"0 ... ~ -$::;- ... - .. .. ;¡ ;; ~ g gggggg g g~ggg ~ ~! ~~ ~ ~~ ~ C!í c:i IoØQr-:~NC ~ :ci~8~ ~ ~ a~ - ã~ ~ ~- i ;:~~ ts ~ ~-~~~ a ~ ~ . ~ ..,{'~ÑM .. = ~=... .. I ~ .... -... = ~ î gg ggggg g g ° a !: . ... co ~~~~¡ ~ ~ . ..; ~i - .. - ~ '" ~."" ~.. - Q '" ;; ..:,..; ~ .. 1£- i~ gg ggggg g g~~gg ! =~ ~~ ~8~~ de 0=00= ~ 5~ ~~ - ~. Q~ Qi~ _to ...N............... ¡ "1.N "l"1..- I: ~ ;; -... ~ ..~.. .. ~ ~ g gggggg I!¡ I!¡~ I!¡I!¡ ! ~~ !~ ~ ~~ ti g~ :;:¡ ~~:¡¡S;~~ ~ ~~ ~~ -~' ~ i ! I ~ ;¡ ~ ~~ - ~ ~ ZIZI I CJ i iii i lid ~ I 1 ¡ 1111111 J I 1I111 ¡i t1 ~ i jli!IIJlljl~1 1 iill! a II 11 ))11 J ..: p·7 ---"". î 88 888888 ~ ~g c:i~:a:f28i ~ t; - _'1\ t"'I.... 0'1 tn.... ~ ~ ~ 8": 'f.iF§"'''''':: .... - .... .., .. .. Q ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ 8 :z:z :Z~~~~ I1i ~-~ "'1. 1"-.. ..... \Ø..f"'L .....~ ~ "'.. .... 00 N.,." .. ..,- '" ~B!- .. - ¡;¡ ~~~ 88888888 8 ] oœ:~ir-:~~: ....: :8....... C!;_ .. '" '":. J! Ij ~ ~ ~...~ ~S.:· ~ - .... ... î 8 88888 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g d~gdd i C '" .... t! i - "'.... .... ~ '" '" ;¡ë~~- - ~ _ M ..: il; ... ..,- :.¡ .~ ].'\s 8 ~~~~~ 8 8 8~888 ~ ~~ ~~ "'C!;~~ ¡) fjfi- d ~o§8~ g 8 ~~c~~ § ~~ M~ :!d~ ¡ < ,J.. :¡;. -~ .~"i. - t"'I oW") 0'11"- _ M t"'I ~ II e; s: ¡;¡ CQ-- !..: do' M ~ - ....- a t;~ ~ 8 88888 ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ a~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ i ~ 5~~~~ ~i = ~~ ~~ ~ Ñ i ¡ ~!:: i ~- . 0'1\0 \Q _ M _ ~~ I .n' Ñ dô _ ..: ~ ~~ M .. ....- ~... .... I I.) i I ! ~ i I d I ~ . i JI .. I H!ldHul~1 ~ HBi ~ jJ 1J Hi] "' J ù.: {J-1 - ~~ ~~~::8=8~~ . . . . . <"! . . . _CIf')"'tt"iMNOM ¡¡ ~ "'00"';Z"''''~'''~ I""-Olf"i ..t"-;."'C1- M\ON- - ::;~ 00===888"'''' "'! r; t'i rot . . ."'Id: "! ß~ ~__r-tt"ir--NOM 00"';Z"''O~'''~ ~ I' 0:. t'\ .. 1""-...'" ..- M\ØN- - ã'" ~--"'-'O"'8'" u§ '1').'" an... M _ an ....:"'vir-:~Mror\e>\Ò _ N- - ~ '" '" ~~ "''''~-'''-=88 eN __"'00 ....:...;~\Òvi...:...:Oci '" _ r---- ~ '" '" !'" ~;!~~~8~88 ui ci"':MMNCc:i¿¿ ... N\Ø- > '" "" ;ê~ 8-"'8'0"''''8''' 0'1') N-If') 0 ci....;~....;oögcici\Õ j> -..... - - "'''' 0,," u ~~ 88"'00"'-"'8'" 'l\l""-oo"l:t'li If') 1!~ dO""';OM"":",¿\Õ 00 _ - => '" 8"" 'é~ NN-f"'oo00 r--OOON ""!"1~~~t"1",!r;~ =~ 'to MV'I OO_'tOM 0... <> ... _OC_Mf'P\N "''''- "" i~ oo~~"''''-=g''' N'" N-""V") DC viM~ocivi"":doM <'" ... _r--_MMN ~ "'''' - ...", ..."'....","'8"'88 Ii \O-I""-N\o M \ÒOMOÔr--:Oo\CO <~ .... _00 - ~ ~ ~.!L~tj I c UJ 0 u;;;ð-"'....zu ... to ~!:r:!!I~~~~~ i .-- ¡¡ :Qrnrnrn 0 . . . . . . . . i _NM"''''\OI''"-OOO\ ~!~~~~~~~ .; II: 2 fJ-GJ ~~ii O;:;:;Ø\"'~:g~o~ -~ ~ ~ O.~~."."'!.-. '0 ¡:::!."!. "OCØ\Ø\Ø\.., "'0 >0 ~ NNØ\-- Ø\OC '- - "'It'- - \0 \0 .. ... !"';¡,j O"'-Ø\~-OCOII'I ..,1:í Š!Þ 1I'I..,r--O II'IN N r--U ~ OC.....r--OC 11'I'" 1I'I.s:I .r- .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. U ðj~ OC .., .., r-- 0 '0 r-- r--. M--N-M - - N ... ~~r¡ ONoc-'OOr--OO ~ ~I¥ ...O-N.., N 11'I ..,""..,Ie'" 0\ ~ ..".. ...... .. II. '0 11'I Ø\ 0\ r-- r-- >.¡;- --N r-- '""= N N CQ ... ~1iIO lI'I'Ooc..,-r---ON ..,.., "'" OO\C)MNN-\o N MM \DU 1"'--V')I/")N-<OIII:tt"-o r--. -- 0\ M............ .. .. ..... ..,r--'OO\'Or-- NN .,... Nll'lr--"'II'IN OCOC ,.. 00--- - . . -- ... r--~-g1i OOCONr--OOON 0\1:í ~U ...N 0- N 'OU N 0'0 r-- 1I'I.s:I .. .. .. u t: .... 0\ .., .., ... ~ui~ OONOCO\II'I-OO 11'I ~ - 0 M - 0'1 M 00 00 M ~ .... ¡ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ CQ~ O\~~g~= ! i~ ~ ~~~ II'IOC!"'II'INOOO ~ ~~ t:~ 'IQ - oeM OO_f"'\M - .. _ ø.] r--~.~"'!.~.." ~ ë~ t: CQ .....,..,NNOC'O OC ..<;:ir--~ -..,..ON- .., 0i'LO 11'I- ~ ~]1 'S~ss ~ ð ~~111'1 ~ fi :c E !!! -s E ~ §.! - ¡¡¡ o ti'" -NM ~ M .. - I :~~~·I~~~~ 1:¡~:¡ Ji; 'Ii c¡o¡ ¡JCQrlJrlJrIJ....u N- - 'I:í "".o,c.- 888u . ~ -2;í!" '8 '0 r--oc Ø\ ~~:::~ j !~~!~!!!~ ~ ~M:~ ~ f) ../D - Rancho del Rey Open Space District No. 20 Annualized Costs Am.Dt AccDmulated for Fllcal Y..n: ""1, '1-9 FY "-\17 92-'3, '3-N, ".."- """ AmOUDt ISm .E.HSL .. SPA IP 1 (Business Ctr.) SPA 1, Phases 2-6 6 SPA 2 PA3 Desilting BlSin . Glen Abbey Telegraph Cyn Channel paymenl (SPA 3 area) Total 5<138, 9,56 Nota: I. Zone 2· SI2,044 &om mise teSClVe used formIC (95196) 2. Zone 2 A 3 - Amortized cost for WIlls not determined 3. Zone I- S26,230 (5 yrs) A $6,700 (3 yrs) for db A lIIbilization structutes not collected beyond 5 yrs per Code; Zone 2 Sg73 (5 yrs) for AC DOt collected. 4. Zone,· Amortize cost. 2)'e11S peIIdina c:onstructiqn of_told 5. Zone,· See TC spradsbeet for cost bteIkdowa on chlnDel. 6. loDes 6 A 7 . Theme WIlVmon\llllClllllÍOll to be 1ddecI. 7. Zone I· Add Sl,06S to teSCIVe for FY \17/98 (mise). M;'" . - . . r I _"",I 5/1_ o' . f)-II : I en ~- .'5'~ I ~ -:"" J5 'b "t ."" ¡¡ ãIãIãI . . .. I ,.... -\C.....;;I; 00 N N ""'C>..-- ~~"oêo\ N '-'.... \C~§C>C> ..... ..... ..... oo~ - 0- \C ..... -- ~ oêr:oêè~ ..0; .....r--.~-t"-- ..... .... "IItN _00 0- t: ..... I - ~ ~ H2 ~ 0 C rn "iI$t jjJj H ·t ¡ ~ 0 CQ ~ 1 .. : t' Æ!I!,.... f" « ~ ¡¡. f i 1 ]¡¡,~u "Bl~ j j~ j'B ~ . 1!li .. ~ !. ;ñ . "t ..; ~ CQ rnrn 2 A-I;;>.... \ "' I ~ ,- .(A*Aa-.~ ~~ ~fNT 13 1:1 )- r VV' ~ It": Ñ¡! ~ . y \ _~ '.oi!- ~~ \' \ \ ,,~ t~ __ 6 Ëli ~_ - II. , ~T' oc . _ - ,"0 ::>.. ~ mnTIIlI JTe-/~ ~ 7't-t.- w> . (tA~ :\\11/1 Þ ~ I- gt: ~ ,-,. ". l' "0 P>( ,,:\ 1111" ~t:::: <: - ¡:; If ) · _" "", ~ II IT 'fiT \': '/. '-' ...... -' z !I! . ~._~ Oil" TTT1 ~ '-,< r~ I " ,"" , '" ,,[1T '" ~ i ~ I 11111 I · . !:i ..... .t. '" 2: I\. 1)à ~ - ,,'0' 1/ R ~~ t l.J -' . IBIB IÐ IBIB _ "-' __ - ï - ./ ., . .... " " 2J!;r = 'i'"-' ~.., · \ oI '-- ) TTT7;¡;! = - ~ p. - J~~ . ': m~""TT . T ( · ~ lm~~ L.. I \ ~ "-",,,err I r !€ ~ ..~" "-¡,,,,,,mE = ~= = ~\ '\ ~ .Y\ :\iIRIE-.. _ -- J..I .... ~Il ~ U ~ ~~(" "Lilli'" -"\; r ;;;;;;;;- :31 IH '- <1"" :'-..' ;Jf i:: -'" ~ CT UI. ~ \---. ~ -" ;;.. _ . I-...J .....t= ~ :;~ \llllllllT ....." -](J.. ~T1 ..J ~_ ~~ IT ~~ _ ' , ." n __.~ ß: iT. on ,...... -<.. - ,n I 11-'1 ~ \ T -rs;;;;;J 1= I 1. '""-+ 1fT '.....' lIT r~ . "" " "õ1 4b' "W 'fl' f- .--, '" ' =-"" 'TIT''' . II:: . , ~""" . ~~'II~ I 7 iñ I ~U:II L ~ . . . i . I ~ . - . 3 \ I . ;; \ = ~ .... :0,\ \ ,_,\'\\\) , ~ 'D-I ~ f I - I - i C'I'I « i ~. i 15~ to- > ~I ~ ......"2 ) ) ) '\ ~-a - . \~ ' - . - . \ .. i , /.".;< ~ ~ -'l . ¡; g . r I 1J. ~ À . t ~ t5 - ~ \~ ~ i~ > r ~T\\\l\\' ¡:; ,--..¡ ':7 ~ Jà. ~ . ~ L -~~. ] ~ " ~ 0 jj ~ - ~ ,,~. .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '\1:J. ~ ! ~ ~~ > 1Ç; ~r . ~\ ?~Ll d",,~ at,)) ~l~" - ~ ~~/" ~ 7~ ~ r- ) .1 ~ ~ ~ J. t3 ~~: .:: ~ - \ ~ ; ~ r::¡ ..:¡ --. ~)~ í'"~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ J. . ~ ..._..... : ~ s..2 ~ -- -J ... K J.,.,-:<. I t:-'1! ~ r \\\1. ~ ;:; '::::j~ " ~ !!!'m \j ~ t"" }>~ ~ :-- J I ¡\~ ~ r-.._"......~, ~ .1 ~ ~ -- ~~ ~ ) : í\\\ ~~" I ~ ~ ~ ~~ .- 1111 I\. ..r ..... "I J V( lr-J - ',.. " ~\ 1 ~ \ ~ M ~ . ... -¿~ .t. .~" . ~ ~ lr' - ~) ~r-"= .. , ~~,~ : y 1::- ~ t; .~1 . " ~ k _ 7 ~~) .."-:. ~ _~:~ 1-<- ...~.. -? . ~ - ~ ... - . -...- - 10 ~ ;i :; . ... :5 2 ::» ~ D _ I.L Q 0 ~ ~ f u ...2 ffi ~ ~ ~ \ . . - . /jlL')!i'~I~~\"\\'')¡ f"",ri:",....L. 'T' ~ ~ -.Q\\~ '- II I I I I,. t· I.J '-~/. ~ 1::111-1-).. ...: .;;: ~ ,\"nf t:' ~ ~ -: -\\' - ...: = 1"':11 '- ...: ..~\~ ""f-'¡ ':;¡ \ ~\t: ~... ""\ \: ~ ì . /' \\\l1;,,\ VY: F-. , . ~ £)" !lit \ ~ on \\' rIß~ ~ \\ffi~, ~ ...t, t;) , ,........... \\H::! ....:::\ ~ 'T. ~ > ':::/11\ U) \\ P ::. ¡::: ~4 ~ þ- ç .... lr-r ~ ~ '- ~ ~ I::ð~"" ~ - iš CZ/ ~-- I Y '\./ r'\~ t5 .... Z ?ÇC/\.-I\\ /J' J'V -- ~ ..< ~ r' &. fs ~~ u: ~ ~ œ;;.. ...:;...:;..... ~ . ~ ~~~ = ~L\ ~ 1\ ~ ,a,~\- \~ ~ IV __ \,;,\ \S» . ~ \' ..- W.x .... 'i: ~\ i ~~ ~~ ~ L- I< ~-j ::J ~ ~ .....~ r- \.-\ ...1\1"'\:' ,\ ~ !:2 ~\o'" '~.\'\\\- ,\ ~~\ a:: eY \;ì ltl l\;\~\. ~:: .... .... .a't ...... 10""... :;.I;:: :: !!! -V ::t t::;: - n\H\\ Q _ ,\ t'\ ~ E ... ~......'~ ~ ;¡;, 'Wr ~ ~ "" :: ~ CL ")..'\.\1_' == ~ (/) ~ r..<: ~1I1r.;;;' -~. ~ ffi mllllr ~ 15 TIll " , " IJT I\W"'" . (i\: ~ 11111'11, ~~ ~ ' I "". 'I n \\\ J: \0-' ~ Þ! "IIrlm\\. ~ ;. ./ ~ '1/1\~ \\~::.\::.J..-\ ~ "\\1 ~~\'\\~ I :rm=œ~ \~~ ~l\\::; ~ '--- ~ \. "IPOr 1Q.5. ~~ ~ ~ ~~"'-L~ V II., .... ,~.. _ . . c~w~'W'~ry''''~''L ~~~ ~ - .- ¡ -~ ~ . - o > ~ j o => - :E: ~ 0 (/) LL Õ 0 w >- o t: ~. 0 -, ~ ~ UJ Q. LL o 0 '\ \........ , - . - .- -- .... . -; ~¡ \ i~ 15 ,,/ I : ....z f I . ) ·Y·--- .- - - - _. - .- --- - . - --- ~ - . - ~ - .-. -_. . . , I -. I i . ..1 ; 'I .....2 . p 4 \ - .. ~ !! ¡ i I!s i i iã Ie! ..42 ~ ~Y"ON . . ~ .: . . \ S'~ -" ~ . '- - \ i!t i ~~ . \ ~¡ ¡ , ~~ ~I > 95 D ~ ~ 0 -1 . . \ I . 10 - d --Z \ z , ~ 0 - 0:: I- C/) - C I.&J . 0 ~ C/) Z I.&J ~ /: =Z. . \ ~ ~. I _u ~------- - ---- .-'.-' ----- -. - -- -..--- -- .- - - C&J < -.....2 ~ f- <Cz.~ ·:z:0> CaJ f-~< %_..3 .- ::> < 'X . ::IE 0 . :z:U - ra] t&. Ct)O . c-· Q.~~ cnfñ- Z_U ÿ]Cra] Q. :I:' o E- o . _.. - --- ,-_. .- _. . . -- . ---- - .-- -.. - _.. -- ..... - . -.-~.- ----~-- -~-- ."" - ----. ~ . . -~ \ ~ .i . . . . i g ¡ i!51!J t-> . II ~ . I - - . ~''J ~. " '<"':1 ~ It . ~ QÎ ~ . ~-14 :¡ ~ ~ . , .~ - . .... . - . . . : I -I . I . III 'I . , I . I .> . .111 I I I . I . I" · . I . ~ ~. II I - II I I I . · . i 1111" II JI' ~ ~ ~~~ I· lL tJ) Z5 . ~ ~ .' .. ~ ffi Q Z . ,- . a: c:( - . ) > ~ ~. ~ o ~ . . -~ . . 'I ~ . · . . . . . /""" ., . . . - - . · 'I "..-.:. . . . . ) "':- . 13-:15- - - . --- - - - - - - ,-- - '.. --- - ~,_.. ... -- . - . .- -.-. ~ _2- . I. ·i , I I~ I . -- - --- -- .. J.. -.-. . . . ~ . \Ð ~ ~~ -. < i g i>-~~ ~I ~ ( - - OPE~ SPACE DISTRICT XO, 31 CITY OF CR1:LA VISTA- .. C01::Io"TY GF SA." DIEGO, 51:ATE OF CALlFOR.'ló1A TELEGRAPH CA.~YOX ESTATES . . '. II~ . . . "I' . . . ¡5 . . -. , j . . I I ! ; , , . i ~ :::: ) _or,," .. 00I1f1'l _ 10 '0' _~ or ..... 0·100. anlllOl -AICI. ..- -01 X'AU) ,.,.._ or _ DuO.. -..cu. III _....I¥ID.. tIC _ _. or M . CIn' or _~ ...., IT'" .. coo..._. .. _,.I or ..AJIIO ..OWII 011I .þ' MIII~DI) &SK....NY ___. .-, · .., "'11'_'"' ." ...,'~ .. "'om.'" or -' · IIn. U'CICIICC . MAX 10 "'" r "'" IIO..L ~ UeOlDtD . nc '"lei Dr .., c." 1:3-1 roo tIC 'lAC' _.. 0# ,_ "11_", 0 _IT ,_ o ~I ...en or ~'" __ 011 1It....1IOO dItISOIC.' ~I -- ,. . . IIIõIT" ~'" - 5-' .. ,""".. nat. . 18"" 0 ...._ '-11 M ... ftlllI'fICC ., .... þ'!"P .... ., '~ 18"" .. ...._ Oft' ., o.u.A ... tiel _ ., . ' I &8'.1-..._ 18"'" -__ IiIn .......511 .. ....... ~ w.a.. , 18". - ...._ ~1101 _ or... lto """.. ~ I"\' &8'''' - ,.._ V.lfA ... _ .... " .to. 0 J&GDP I I ~ 1iI&'" .. 5'.... ... ~... ..,. 0 --- ........, .... .pq- .- · ·U, - ......,.. .. Tf"'a"fÎII.... " 1!IiiiI9"fr. . ! c:::::::> """".&.. TI" .... 1101 ...... _ . or .. - t _ .tA" .. ...._ . . : I I -,. '""'- 5VUIIITT ..... UII 81' .... ..."" ..w.. ... . J.. . '.' ~:~ _II. -... "PO ) ¡ ~ø#~ _ua_ _ r~ ~ __.______...__. OPÞI PACe ØII"IIICT 110. I. ::1'.-.-.-.--- ~ .~.........-- "'"' 110. , Of' ' I -. .. - ... . . . "''''1 . - - . .' . _. 4_9 . _._ . ·4 ... . -- "--- -.,. . . . .WI It · OI~11 ..0 II- .~ .. Ie,) . & . .O~ . .- . ,- lOG . . . . II _c ... .- ID) ... ,. c&. .. .0 . .. . . .' G C . 0 B ID) . ,I . &\Z ~ I . . . . . . . . . 1),1 .. II' II . ~-,q I I tIll I ~._-_. , -- -- - ~ : . . .. , . - . , . J . a... Þ'.+r'c.i- ,-4- , ør. . &oW\cI.rl ¡A"fIMW'. . .t \ 1I.r1.....""~ ' . . ).. ~ (11.,.ØZ'.z,) . -.c ~-- :k .., '«I It¡ ~)"'.. INN . ,.",.,,~ CU ¿.iJl1il. ~ (4'''.'11.38) '" . . · Q) II) · . ~ - fQ 4L ""lrlr/fl - . - I ,lf4S T"'''!tAIIT - .. , I (147·t?ZI.,.,) ~ , . I " . · I CD · I ~ I -- " ~OU¡ 4X.c", - . ~ - 1f~.sTAtI~A r - ~ - IT' 'U /11 . " - - ~ - , II' 0 " II ¡:: 10 . ST. · · ~. ~ . 11 . . - i · - - - If þ 0 . . 01lA... "z ·0 'uu .A. . BAY BOULEVARD ~-2.0 0"" - 04-19_ 89 LIGHTING a LANDSCAPING OlSTRICT .. . . - . -- ::.0'_...·. ''''''.-''" ..-......- --- - -. ....-- .- . ( . , .. . .-- . , -6- - . .....,. . . @> ~~4.:'.I . . l1f/-IJI @) bå.""1 c.t '. ø /U4·IZ : . . .IJ~/-IJZ e ·!ÞO"'''!At'y. : . . @ . 4'61 IJ,,-IJJ ~. ASS4S$ØIl. Il""~ (!) (J~4 'Z'ø .' "', 6~a (!) fJU·,. · 1J1/·1J1 e> ø """ -,. III 1I~/-16 e ·æ (J44'~. ::) IJ~/-'~ @J ~ (J'1,-14 0 (!) 1J44'I6 .', ~ 1J1'-11 @ . (!) (J44 ·14 ~ 0 - . (J7I-I. (J44;,.I . 117'-/~ 0 I (J1-4'IZ .. ... T . 8 /41·11 ,.,-1. . o ISI'Z/J ~ ~ ~ .8 IIZ·I. I ~ ~ @ IIZ·/. . i . ... o IIZ'1'1 Q ~ I V) o 111-/4 Q: , , tí Q IIZ -I. ~ ,.,-" ~ . ~ - , ..-. 0 . ~ . , 0 --. 'II· .f . . ,.,-6. : . '.'-.11 @ ( -- ~ $T~~6 T 5UT rO,21' , , 'ILl NO.JD-DC)_ . OWN .,,: ./Wlt T()}f/N' CENTeR NR I 5711££7 J./~HTI^,(; , DATE: J.,JN!)$C':P,£ M':INT~N~,vC= O/5TI/ICT . - , . . . .. - :..:-- ...- -; q í. .r<" . . . ~. ~-., :- .: - . ........-- -.- . ....,r. .,s ". \' 1·1 __ _ . __ . . .. , . , .... .. . , t- ~ ~ a , ... . 0 . ~ I a . Ii.-- __. .. . .. ... ..... - .. .. '. I'Ø -Iii _. 0 0 -- o , -ŒJ-~-:' · · . . . - 0 - . .. -. · . . . . .. o',...,.,C:f..-· . . !>CKr.~ ~, . - . S4SSØI1. . "~(J1t . --:-e.- 1'''·1 n4·/J ~ 0 ". 6~ð . --.-- . .-- 8 0 - .. - '. . - .... . ... 0 ~ Z1Ø-Z3 ~3"·PI ~ · - . ---.... . . - -- - t '0 . °S$1rtJl -S ..- - J,/.I)J ~'T'" . ___a . H,( ".-. . Ie 0 .--.... '. tq . .... ... .. ~ .. . ..~... . - - --..- ~ . --- ... . PA"~ WtA yo . . . 0 .' .II~-I" 0 .. ..... . 0 0 . Q 0 .... . ~ a ßølJ-".. , 0 . .~ . . ~ .ISII-" 8 .. 1I(i- Sr/é'44T · s.t!.I..t-D~ , . . . -.J 'ILl NO .!DoDD., ï()~VN C£Ni:.£ . V~ .r .sTñ'£~T llGIITINO t C&T~: ¿~N;SC':,':£ ''':'':I;'./i':N':'NC~ Ol6il11cr . . . . - . . . ..... . .. ~z . O' Z , a , ' ... c-l¡ -< 9 f . " .,~ s , ~ .' Ii);! ~ ~' ~ . ~ ~ '5' . ~ ' 'I ¡E' z · ~,I c:( ÞO I :i &. , i, . . . . . ._.'. _._.'. .....h. -- ~. - .. .. .. . . . . . I' r EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE ·DISTRICT NO.1 . ct: .. . CITY OF OCULi VIITA 1- .' COUNTY OF SAN OIIGO.ITATI OF C&U'ORNIA ; ~ ~ '. . . . ........ . . \~. __ 0 . ~ . . ~ J ,1."" ._~~ .~~~ . '\\.11 ....~~., '. ~\ 7. ') ....~~_ . ~ ~ V . . ,,,,){ .. . . ~A/I' " .. ~í' " II M \' \\ 7 ; . ~__JL ZONE. ¡ . r-lr~ .J' e 'I II: ~~- ,-~~-·-è ) ....:::::::.... ~~ I " ~ 1/ \\ . ~ , ,,'I \~ ~ . . , ,'/ . ~ .. '. ~~ . I --.J1... ~ ¿ : r·-~ . r. . ~ . "/ ~ ø . ~ . ~ p ~" ~ .- . .:t::::::__~' . jO" . .. -- ~" ,- . ~--.:;;.' '. . .,.- _.'. .,...' . - . . ~. . . . . . '. \ Et~"'·-""''' ~~4 e ............. -..........- .. .-4'I.J .... r --.. . tIIf'!I _.~ I -..... - t " .", ~ \+ ~ , - -'- - '. .. . . . M '. EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ~ o CITY or OCUL.A . ¥lITA . . .' 1. 0 . OCIUNT~ OF IAN elEOO.ITA":!, OF CA1JPI INIA - l . o o . . . o . ~... .' - - .. . . ZONE C 0 . o o '. o . . . -' . . . 0 . ~ =....,_._l~. 6 .....................,.. . ...41.1 ........... . ~~ ,-v.::.w _ -....... . ....... . "_._~~..._,._..:.~..-_.- - ~<_..' ..,..-.,...... +---..._~~=---_. - - ..---. - - - This Page Blank - . ,-at, -- - . . . June 6, 1996 900 Otay LIkes Rd. ChuIa VJSta, CI1if. 91910 City ofChula VISta Dept. Of Public Works, Engr. Div. 276 Fourth Ave. . Chula VJSta, Calif. . 91910 Dear Sir, Reference your notice dated 5/23/96 on the subject of annual usessmelit for maim.....nee of the Open Space District; I have no trouble with a modest increase if you stipulate that all' such lIIOIIÎes will be used exclusively and directly for the maintenance of opeD spaces adjacent or DellI' by. I would appreciate a response usuring me that this will be the case. IfIlece"'·'Y please forward this letter to the City Counell for a public clarification. Thank you!! W. D. Snell . 061) \ or 1'6" ? (1-/ ?I:.,,-'d "f7/ere, -- 6-17-96 Dear City Clerk, This letter is in response to the annual assessment for the OSDt4 in my area. We moved into our home in October, 1994. At that time the area surrounding our home was watered daily automatically. The watering system has apparently been turned off since earty 1995. My concem is that without regular watering the area becomes a hazard for possible fire. I respectfully request that the area be watered again on a regular basis and that the residents in the area have access to the controls should a brush fire break out. Our home is at the bottom of a canyon with thick brush. I must compliment the city for keeping the brush cut back from our property. A crew came out last year and did a wonderful job of keeping the brush away from our fence. I also contacted the city over a year ago and raised some concerns about some large trees that could fall onto our house should a severe storm knock them over. Several months after my call a crew came out and cut the trees down and hauled away the debris. I was very pleased with their work and cleanup. I believe that the proposed increase of $6.49 for FY 96\97 is a modest one and I would support this as long as there is not a cut back in the watering service. We love living in the Bonita area and enjoy the country atmosphere here with the greenbelt surrounding our home. The city has been responsive to our prior requests and we hope to hear a positive response to this letter. Should there be any questions please contact us at the address and number below. Respectfully Yours, r.ftm --y ~~ Terrance and Shan Corrigan 1330 RidgeviewWay Bonita, Calif. 91902 (619) 421-1996 C-~ -------" ~í)f (/~J'11~(j~117~ $,;}.;t. ~ -~-OJ~~(J- ~- ~ ~ ~ . ~~~ \)F 01Y OF ~ CHUlA VISTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS ~ ENGINBBRlNG DMSION . ~ ~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARINGS 5/28/96 1 The City Council will consider the annual assessment (proposed Fiscal Year 96/97) for )1. mAintp.nance of the Open Space Disttict areas at public hearings scheduled for: ~ ~ . June 18, 1996 (Tuesday) at 6:00 p.m. "i July 16, 1996 (Tuesday) at 6:00 p.m. 4 Tho"""" will_ ."'"''' CoomclI CbomI>m. 27.'_ A...... """" V"" "" .. "" . ~ the purpose of taking testimony on the assessment proposed by staff. The hearings are intended to provide an opportunity for property owners within the disttict to convey and express to the ~ City Council their support or opposition to the proposed assessment. At the second hearing ~ ~ (July 16, 1996), the City Council will consider and may confirm the proposed assessment as set forth in this notice or may choose to decrease the final assessment for Fiscal Year 1996/97 after ~ considering all public testimony. Please be advised that letters of support or opposition may be ~ ~ flied during the public hearings or filed by mail prior to the second hearing at City of Chula i V.... Cily am. 27. ...... A....... CIwk V.... CA 9'910.. iif .~ ~ This assessment is not a "new" assessment. City Council considers the amount of the open . ~ space assessment each year, takes public comments, and then determines the assessment amount. ~ The purpose of the AnmlA! assessment is to continue maintenance of the Open Space District ~ J' . areas adjacent to or near property owned by you. ~ . On the reverse side of this letter within the box, you will find the Open Space District Number ")... (OSD #), the proposed assessment (FY 1996/97) and your current assessment (FY 1995/96). '-.. \L The proposed assessment equals your Current asSt'"SIT'ent increased by CPI (estimated at 2.3%). Please note that the City Council may choose to collect less than the assesem~ d"'P"""ing on ~ interest earnings, cost savings, etc. within the Open Space District Fund. The amount will be ~ collected in two instaJ.1ments on your property tax bill. ~ ~ Your participation in this process is encouraged. Should you need additional information, have ¡ ~ f any questions or wish to set up an appointment with staff, please call DoIiDa Snider, Department . "II .- of Public Works-Engineering at (619) 691-5266. .~ .~ ~# - ~ " ~ ~ ~ ..--.... fi .J,:. whJtt;""i- ~ ~ ~ C-3 ;,Jø.1J J,.;r]:J-b}(l"S,. ~ "5"" ~ . L€ ß 11 fict... CD .' +-C/#r t.~~ ..¡..".. ~ fl!cl ~ - ~{~ ~: ~Yt~ Praort ctfç~ Flret CI... L~~ u.s. I'oet_ "AID ~~~~ ......1 t "7 San DIego, CA CITY OF CHUIA VISTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Car-Rt Pre-Son ··COO4 ENGtNEERING DIVISION 276 FOURTH AVENUE 5952620500 CHULA VISTA. CA '1'10 Walter J and Judith M Scon !! ~ 1850 Pon Albans =- Chula Vista, CA 91913-1225 ¡~ I; 1"1 (') OSDNELMDl - IT! FY 95/96 $9.32 ~;: .. - _:Þ < FY 96/97 $9.53 :; < ! ITI ii> 0 ñ.... .. - :-.... CD .. t6þ/?-, /ÎTrd: ~."r t?é"~¿. -rAtJ £,,,~.c·_ -' ~~r' eyfr~Þ 7a /A/P,e~ .-£- ~ ¡.kc'<" ez.4'~/ :z- ~~ ~r .ß/)uF"~ ~ -y¿¡"~ '.[/:¡7¡ h ~t:F A- ~o/: .Hr' ~ ,&-da/ -/J,.~# ~r ~ ¿, ?Jk- ~,~ ð"f/ ~~ k,-~ ~~~ ~'N~ .~ '*' ~ ~ . /.(/~A!. t¡((n:r1 ¿V~~// :Ç'r es- /I ðr 'Anv A-II/¿; A '7». - /.,.,I;~:=- K /~. ~s /I,¡4- . C" . 7/I,¡<it. 4 1&., . Çdi J),,,, - ~-¡~ ~f{4-r7~.(I F" ¿f2/-tlð/g COMPLIANCE WJ11f AMERICAN WJ11f DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), re9ucsts . individuals who may need special accomodation to access, and/or panicipate in a City meeting, activity or service request such accomodation at least fony-eight hours in advance for meetinJs and five days for scheduled services and activities, Please contact Donna Snider for information or to place your request at (619) 691-5266. California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired at 585-5647 (TDD). C-4f - - \ T*", + June 12, 1996 City of Chula Vista Department of Public Works EngineeringDiv~sion Attn: Donna Snider This letter is in regard to the your Notice of Public Hearings dated 28 May 96 re: City Council annual assessment of Open Space District areas of Chula Vista. . As a resident of Bonita Long Canyon, ODS#14 I am against your intentions of of increasing the assessment of the open areas for the following reasons: a. I have not seen any maintenance people maintaining the areas. Dead Bushes, weeds and grasses during summer time are not cleaned which are all fire hazard to the community. b. Last year I called your office requesting a clean up of of the back of my house (which is an open space, because I feel that those brown trees/grass are fire hazard. Somebody in your office referred me to call the Wildlife. Wildlife told me that those areas can not be cleaned because a special specie of birds are living their. If bird. are prioriti.. ov.r prot.cting our hou...·from fir. then l.t Wildlife pay the tax.. for those open spac.. I think its just fair for all residents of Bonita Long Canyon. c. People who bought houses (speaking for myself) in this areas are losing money and can hardly pay their exorbitant property taxes. Property owners in our area have lost a lot of money and still the City or member of City Council have the nerve of increasing the taxes of these open areas which is another additional burden on their pocket. Can the City think of something to help out residents hold/stay in these areas. DON'T DRIVE PEOPLE OUT OP CBtJLA VISTA/OR BONITA LONG CANYON. I a very concerned citizen and hopefully what I have said in this letter will make each and everyone in City Council to consider that increasing or putting another money burden on our part is unbecoming and unconsiderate. ,L. t,,~.u&·.t '1:r- . Mrs Jelicula Ban~t C-S' ~'d "/11f't'.ø . \ _C~f~J""\*\u __ -- - , . T-+c... :4;- 494-228 Belle Vista Drive Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 14, 1996 City of Chula Vista Department of Public Works Engineering Division 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Reference: Notice of Public Hearing OSD#11 To Whom It May Concern: Please consider this as a statement of stroBg support to continue the assessment for Open Space District Number 11. Both my husband and I feel that it is money well spent. We have lived in Chula Vista for just fourteen months and have been extremely pleased with the maintenance of the open space surrounding our townhouse and proud to live in our Chula Vista neighborhood. We are also pleased with the effort that was made to make us aware of the public hearing. " . ....- -........, . u;'~ .2 :.. ~.~ ~ ~~~: 'b" '.'~ -' ~fo '-I . () <-S'l1>l£J.'l:\\\ ~\, C-lø ::1Ãe»--- .. \7 - June 6, 1996 900 Otay Lakes Rd. ChuIa VIItI, Calif. 91910 City of Chula Vista Dept. Of Public Works, En¡r. Div. 276 Founh Ave. Chula Vista, Calif. 91910 Dear Sir, Referenc.e your notice dated 5/23/96 on the subject of annual usessment for maintenance of the Open Space District; 1 have no trouble with a modest increase if you stipulate that alllUch monies . will be used exclusively and directly for the maintenance of open spaces adjacent or near by. . J would appreciate a response assurins me that this will be the case. Ifnece,pry please forward this letter to the City Council for a public clarification. Thank you!! W. D. Snell . . . C-l o6b \ or t1þ',? ..._.... ____m___..__ ,..'::< -"'....\ ¡..f"'l (lit- __.__ un __H._ --_.- .._-- .. .. . . -- - . . . Memo . To: Donna Snider From: John Strasner Data: June 4, 1996 Re: Open Space District 1 annual assessment. Regarding tile ennuI' usessment propoul for melntelllllCl of the Open lplcel)lltJtcl.... 1, I hive no objection to the new Imount of ~.ae providing tile following Is met. Who ever Is contl1lcted to perfonn the mllntenlnce does um kill tile Ivy on our WID u II tile cue currently. n Ills tlken me over two (2) months to eleln the deld Ivy from over 100 feet of our property IdJlcent to tile perk. The cause of the deld Ivy was I dll1lct result of the current melntelllnoe crew UIIng foUege killer which penetrlted the roots of our ~ Ind killed n. By III lights we should hive hid the perk melntelllllCl crew cleln up the mas they I1f1II1cI repIInt new Ivy In Its pllce. We will not do thIt If the fulul1Imelntenlnce crew only clelns the plrk side Ivy end does not kill the pllnt. ~eglrdS. . => John StrIsner 13811 Don Clrtos Ct. ChulI VIsta. CA 1111110.7107 421-1415 . . . . . ~-9 O~t:>· \ ~"-~\d ,,/t, /q r.." - . .. - " ·7" ~,'@N6-rv*-IW:¡-=l~ . ~~~~. ~~£L'j__~ ~-i fJ- ~,)àt¡l"¿r ~ .'" ~ I ~...~ ,J('~¿pr¿~, ~/1EC!jsP5tr..,,~,,-, ~~~f'6/f7, I 7tGr#f~"'C" r , ! ~~~ : I~..~.". - _._ ~ ~ I -p. r'c!. (,/ii1./t:t(. ...; ,'"" ... .....p.:... ~. ~ I _ ___~ lë~ÞI , .--- . : . . c.-q. ._- -.", .., n_._.._._ .._ _ .- ~..._. --- ... J6----.:A~... '- ",- ø)¡4?J. .- - . f '. , ~ I ::-1 1ftJ . cy "I c¿vI" t'ö-4 j)-e I: . "/. pu J¡'~ 11/,,,. is tF~3/~~)' ,;", /Jill. ì ..Lf)J~>- ("'ß~'t?' ..... . .-- --.. . r j~~~i,;tk , t1~;¿ ~#(~,.~~-d r-7k ' ~ 1~ ~z:::. I ~ . (ðS/)f! 7"~/7"I'st'tI Ç5P&S.--1 i J-';t;;.4 (Fy Im19~ i ~~ $ $¿I~.~ ?~(;~L ¡ tff ~./I-' ~c·",~-c ø ~ l t5~ 4/--z. ($4. 917/7/ ¡ ,. .' __";;:~...i.· ____.. - --. ----------- .'- '. C-IO . - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item J(" Meeting Date 7/16/96 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 69 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF THE BAYSHORE BIKE ROUTE PROPOSED WITHIN THE CHULA VISTA COASTAL ZONE SUBMITTED BY: Comm",'" D~,opm.m DIM",", (FC, . REVIEWED BY: City Manager (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No XI Council Referral No. NA Due to the number of public hearings scheduled for the July 16, 1996 meeting, staff requests that this public hearing be continued to a date and time certain, that being Tuesday, July 23, 1996 at 6:00 p.m. The Coastal Commission staff have been advised of this rescheduling. IM:\home\commdev\buchan\bikeschd.113] /¿. -I c COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM /7 MEETING DATE: 7/16/96 )~:J'?I ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving Proposed Spending Allocations for Proposed Quarter of a Cent Sales Tax For Libraries SUBMITTED BY: lib"" Directo<~ ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manageu~,~ /Z- (4/5th Vote: Yes_No_X.) The County Board of Supervisors have voted to place a one quarter of a cent sales tax on the County's November 5, 1996 ballot to supplement support for local public libraries. This measure would require approval by two-thirds of the voters. On June 11, 1996 the City Council approved Resolution No. 18335 supporting this proposal and a similar one eighth of a cent proposal (Mello SB- 1958) (ATTACHMENT A). In the meantime, the County has been attempting to seek urgency legislation in Sacramento to allow this referenda to appear on the ballot. On Monday, June 24, 1996 the Republican members of the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee amended SB 1958-Mello to require that any library tax placed on the ballot would have to be accompanied by a vote on all other existing local taxes that fall under the umbrella of Proposition 62, and those subject to question in the case of Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. Guardino. Although efforts are being made by the City's lobbyist, the County, and the California Library Association to remove or circumvent the amendment, there is a good chance this will "kill" the County's effort at this time. The Legislature will recess beginning July 12, 1996 and return on August 5, 1996. The deadline for Board of Supervisors approval for any ballot measure for the November election is August 9, 1996. In response to a question by Senator Lucy Killea, the Legislative Council opined that urgency legislation was not needed since the County already had constitutional and statutory authority to place a library sales tax on the November ballot using Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.5. However, the County Council disagrees with this legal opinion. This situation is a very fluid one. Although there is a very good chance that the County will not pursue a ballot measure this year, as of today, no final decision has been made. Should the County decide to go forward with the referendum, they are required to write and approve the ballot measure wording by August 9th. In order to write the measure, the Board will need spending allocation plans ITom each independent city library by the end of July. In light of this uncertainty, staff recommends that the most prudent course of action is for Council to proceed with approval of a spending plan for any potential tax monies raised. If the County decides not to pursue the ballot measure before the Council meetil1g on July 16th, this item will be pulled ITom the agenda. /7-/ --.... ~-. ..--" ..... -.-.-...,----.----.....- ITEM ,PAGE 2 MEETING DATE: 7\9/96 RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the expenditure plan for the anticipated revenue raised rrom the proposed quarter of a cent sales tax to supplement current library service. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Library Board of Trustees met in a special workshop, with members of the Friends of the Library, on June 19, 1996. The Board voted to unanimously endorse the staff proposal (ATTACHMENT B). DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that should the quarter of a cent sales tax for libraries be approved, approximately $50 million annually would be raised county-wide, with $3 million per year accruing to Chula Vista based upon the amount of sales tax activity. The tax would be collected for five years, beginning in January 1997 (1997-2001). The total amount collected would, therefore, be approximately $15,000,000. This figure could rise or fall depending on sales tax revenue. The monies could only be used to supplement current public library services provided by the General Fund, and not used to supplant current services. After a review of the options, the Library Board of Trustees, Friends of the Library, and staff recommend the following expenditure plan for these $15 million dollars. This proposal is designed to appeal to a wide range of voters and to garner support rrom all parts of the community as well as meet high priority needs for library service. Construct Rancho Del Rey Branch Library A majority of the dollars raised should be used to fast track the construction of the Rancho Del Rey branch library. As called for in the Library Facility Master Plan, this 30,000 square foot project is to be funded 100% by Development Impact Fees (DIF). However, it is anticipated that the total amount of public facility D IF funds needed will not be available until 2010. It has been determined that sales tax monies raised solely for libraries (which will go directly into the General Fund) could be used for the construction as long as DIF monies eventually reimburse the General Fund. These General Fund reimbursements could then be used to pay for Library operations once the building is constructed. Under this proposal, the $9 to $11 million Rancho Del Rey Library could be constructed approximately eight years earlier than anticipated and that a steady stream of revenue would be then available to operate the facility for up to 9 years after completion. Improved Public Service at Other Branch Libraries It is further recommended that the remaining one-third of the monies collected (or approximately $5 million dollars) be spent to improve the quality of current public services J 7~.,.2. --...-- ___"____.m_ __ _...__,...__......._...... _ _.. ____m__ __..____~ ITEM , PAGE 3 MEETING DATE: 7\9/96 provided at Civic Center/Main, South Chula Vista and EastLake Libraries. It is anticipated that approximately $1 million dollars per year (1997-2001) would be spent on three primary target areas: Improve Access to New Technologies With information delivery now so reliant upon computer technology, public libraries are faced with a never ending struggle to catch-up with public demands and expectations. Funds would be used to purchase and implement a new unix based local library automation system, as well as upgrade hardware and software Monies would also be used to comply with the frequent request to provide all elementary and high schools access to the public library's catalog. In addition, access to the world of information offered by these new technologies would be improved by increasing the public service hours at South Chula Vista Library anywhere from 8 to 12 hours per week. This effort would also help implement phase II of SmartCommunities which found that residents wanted more online library services. Improve Children's Services During the last IS years, the quality of school libraries has steadily deteriorated. For many students, the public library has become the first, last and only resource. The quality of children's and young adult services would be improved by offering more materials, more progrannning, and more after school activities. Adding the above mentioned eight to twelve hours of public services at South Chula Vista would also greatly enhance children's access to such services in the southern section of the City. More Money for Books Staff estimates that $500,000 (in 1996 dollars) is needed annually to augment the circulating book, periodicals, reference and audio visual budgets at all branch libraries, which together create a unified community resource. Even though the buildings may have reached collection capacity, it is still essential that new books be purchased to replace those that wear out, are lost in circulation or become outdated. Library users expect that their public library will have up-to-date, current materials for their use. Although some monies for materials would be allocated to all branches, the majority of these funds would be used to replace the CIP funding at South /?-J .._- - - m..._. .___..___________.. .__ .........__........._._______m.__._... ~~._. ITEM , PAGE 4 MEETING DATE: 7\9/96 Chula Vista Library, which is paying for the development of the foundation collection. However, in FY 1998-99 this appropriation will end and the General Fund will need to pick up the cost of maintaining the circulating book, reference, periodical and audio visual budgets. The workload created by this augmentation could easily be absorbed by the Technical Services Division since the total dollars spent on materials would still be less than current expenditures (CIP plus General Fund). If this spending plan is approved by Council, the infonnation will be forwarded to the County of San Diego and the plan will appear in greatly shortened fonnat in the voter's guide, assuming that the County decides to put this measure on the November 1996 ballot. FISCAL IMPACT: As discussed above, if approved by two thirds of the votes, the quarter of a cent sales tax would raise approximately $3 million a year, for five years, for the Chula Vista Public Library. This $15 million would be used to supplement current General Fund support. The monies collected would come directly to the City of Chula Vista. /7,'1 .- -- ---- ------------_._--~--- ------_.~--- RESOLUTION NO. /8'..:17/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING PROPOSED SPENDING ALLOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED QUARTER OF A CENT SALES TAX FOR LIBRARIES WHEREAS, the County Board of Supervisors have voted to place a one quarter of a cent sales tax on the County's November ballot to supplement support for local public libraries; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 1996, the Council approved Resolution No. 18355 supporting this proposal and a similar one eighth of a cent proposal (SB-1958); and WHEREAS, the County has been attempting to seek urgency legislation in Sacramento to allow this referenda to appear on the ballot; and WHEREAS, staff has forwarded to Council, for its consideration, a proposal for spending the possible monies raised from the proposed quarter of a cent sales tax ("Expenditure Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Library Board of Trustees and members of the Friends of the Library met at a special workshop on June 19, 1996 and voted to endorse the Expenditure Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Expenditure Plan set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein, to supplement current library service. Presented by Approved as to form by David Palmer, Library CL-~~ Ann Y. M ore, Inter~m c~ty Director Attorney C:\rs\library.tax I?',Ç EXHIBIT "A" Construct Rancho Del Rev Branch Librarv A majority of the dollars raised should be used to fast track the construction of the Rancho Del Rey branch library. As called for in the Library Facility Master Plan, this 30,000 square foot proj ect is to be funded 100% by Development Impact Fees (DIF) . However, it is anticipated that there will not be sufficient public facility DIF fees available until 2010. It has been determined that sales tax monies raised solely for libraries (which will go directly into the General Fund) could be used for the construction as long as DIF monies eventually reimburse the General Fund. These General Fund reimbursements could then be used to pay for Library operations once the building is constructed. Under this proposal, the $9 to $11 million Rancho Del Rey Library could be constructed approximately eight years earlier than anticipated and that a steady stream of revenue would be then available to operate the facility for up to 9 years after completion. ImDroved Public Service at other Branch Libraries It is further recommended that the remaining one-third of the monies collected (or approximately $5 million dollars) be spent to improve the quality of current public services provided at civic Center/Main, South Chula vista and EastLake Libraries. It is anticipated that approximately $1 million dollars per year (1997- 2001) would be spent on three primary target areas: Improve Access to New Technologies with information delivery now so reliant upon computer technology, public libraries are faced with a never ending struggle to catch-up with pUblic demands and expectations. Funds would be used to purchase and implement a new unix based local library automation system, as well as upgrade hardware and software Monies would also be used to comply with the frequent request to provide all elementary and high schools access to the public library's catalog. In addition, access to the world of information offered by these new technologies would be improved by increasing the public service hours at South Chula vista Library anywhere from 8 to 12 hours per week. This effort would also help implement phase II of Smartcommunities which found that residents wanted more online library services. Improve Children's Services During the last 15 years, the quality of school libraries has steadily deteriorated. For many students, the public /?-¿ library has become the first, last and only resource. The quality of children's and young adult services would be improved by offering more materials, more programming, and more after school activities. Adding the above mentioned eight to twelve hours of public services at South Chula vista would also greatly enhance children's access to such services in the southern section of the City. More Money for Books Staff estimates that $500,000 (in 1996 dollars) is needed annually to augment the circulating book, periodicals, reference and audio visual budgets at all branch libraries, which together create a unified community resource. Even though the buildings may have reached collection capacity, it is still essential that new books be purchased to replace those that wear out, are lost in circulation or become outdated. Library users expect that their public library will have up-to-date, current materials for their use. Although some monies for materials would be allocated to all branches, the majority of these funds would be used to replace the CIP funding at South Chula vista Library. Currently the CIP is paying for both the development of the foundation collection, as well as for new, ongoing purchases and sUbscriptions. However, in FY 1998-99 this appropriation will end and the General Fund will need to pick up the cost of maintaining the circulating book, reference, periodical and audio visual budgets. The workload created by this augmentation could easily be absorbed by the Technical Services Division since the total dollars spent on materials would still be less than current expenditures (CIP plus General Fund). c:\RS\LIBRARY.TAX /7-- ? , ATTACHMENT A Minutes - June 11, 1996 Page 9 í feel a 3-way stop was safe or that an additional stop sign was warranted. There was no accident history at the intersection and it had very few warrants. If Council considered the installation of a stop sign. staff recommended that it be an all-way stop. Councilmember AJevy felt the accidents had not been reported and the residents noted there had heen a number of near misses. He recommended the installation of an all~way stop. MS (AlevylRindone) to install an all-way stop at Oleander Avenue and Mariposa Circle/Mariposa Street. Councilmember Padilla stated he would not support a 3-way stop at a 4-way intersection and supported the motion. · · · Mayor Horton returned to the dais at 9:32 p.m. . . . VOTE ON MOTION: approved unanimously. · Carl E. Hodges, 1291 Nacion Avenue, Chula Vista, CA, expressed concern tbat motorists would not realize that the stop sign had heen installed. He recommended that Council authoriu the installation of black/white signs which would state that a 4-way stop would be installed in two weeks. Mr. Swanson informed Council that signs were put in in advance that there was a stop sign ahead and a red lIasher was placed on top of the stop sign for a week or two. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR Items pulled: none. Tho rrunutos will rollect tho published agonda order. OTHER BUSINESS 16. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTIS) a. Scheduling of meetings. No report given. b. Replacement of the City Attomey. Councilmember Rindone stated after reviowing tho information submitted by tho city manager, he recommended the following changes: 1) addition of "full time" on the front of the recruitmont tlyer; 2) addition of "ethics and promoting ethics in government" added to the centor section of the lIyor; and 3) salary and benefits of $50,000. He felt the city manager's office should be given authority to adjust tho closing dato anywhere from July 31st to August 30th depending upon the printing cyclos of tho p<riodicals. Councilmember AJevy stated he concurred with Councilrnomber Rindono's comments. MSUC (Rindone/Alevy) to approve the job description as revised, authorize the use of a recruiter, and to hold a modified assessment center. c. Mr. Goss stated that on 3/19/96, Council awarded tho 1995/96 pavemont overlay program contract. Tho contract price for the work was lower than any unit cost for the work in the past six years. In order to take advantage of the low price, staff proposed to proceed with additional work at $80.000. There was sufficient monoy in the CIP for the next fiscal year to cover the costs. Thorofore, staff would proceed with a change order unless otherwise indicated by Council. 17. MAYOR'S REPORTCS) a. RESOLUTION 18335 SUPPORTING SB 1958 AND TO SUPPORT A RELATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY PROPOSAL FOR A 1/4 CENT 5-YEAR SALES TAX FOR LIBRARIES //-9 I , --,-..---.- Minutes June 11, 1996 Page 10 Councilmember Rindone stated the city needed funds for the operation of Ijbrary servic~. Council did not want i to sacrifice the quality of life for the library services. Councilmember Moot questioned the guarantee the cities would receive the funds. David Palmer, Library Director, responded that the Board of Equalization would pass the money directly to the cities. Councilmember Moot stated the letter from the County Board of Supervisors stated the money could not be used to supplant existing services and projects and requested clarification. Mr. Palmer replied that a base year would be determined, i.e. the year that the tax was approved, FY 1996/97, The city would be asked to maintain the general fund support of the libraries at the base year level and the additional funds could be used to enhance hours should they be cut, as an example. RESOLUTION 18335 OFFERED BY MAYOR HORTON, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 4-1 with Moot opposed. b. RESOLUTION 18336 OPPOSING AB3116 (CURRENTLY INACTIVE) REGARDING STATE PRISON CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING FACILITIES IN THE SOUTH BAY, AND AMENDING THE LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM ACCORDINGLY - These items are not addressed in the Legislative Program or otherwise require direct Council action. RESOLUTION 18336 OFFERED BY MAYOR HORTON, reading of the text was waived. Mayor Horton responded that she wanted Council to take a position coflecting that the city's strong opposition to the facility. ¡ 18. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Rindone · Concerns regarding attomey fees paid for the City Manager. Councilmt:mbt:r Rindone statoo there:: had been inquiries about attorney fees that had been paid by the city for the city manager which he was not aware of. He did not remember discussing in closed session approval of hiring an attorney for the city manager and he was concemed that it would set a precedent which Council had not addressed. He was also concern~ that the city manager had discussed the issue with the city attorney at the time regarding representing his interests. He recommended that the city manager cover the fees incurred. Mayor Horton stated it was her understanding that the city manager was willing to pay the fees. In a situation when an employee could not be represented by the city attorney, she felt there should be some plan whereby the person would have legal counsel. She felt there should be a policy with a cap for such services required by Council appointees. Mr. Goss stated if the Council felt they needed to take action to approve or disapprove the payment, and if Council wanted him to pay the cost he would do that. It was approximately 3 hours of review of his response to make sure that there was nothing included that could create a liability for the city or himself as an officer of the city. It was a minimal amount of assistance. Normally, the city attorney would have been his advisor, but he had made it clear that his responsibility was to the Council. The government code made it discretionary to the Council as to whether they supported such a payment. Councilmember Moot felt there were extenuating circumstances that crèated confusion as to what was appropriate. He was one of those people under the impression that under Ihe circumstances it was appropriale for Mr. Goss to seek preliminary advice. He had been told by the city attorney that he could not, and would not, provide Mr. Goss legal advice. He felt Mr. Goss should pay the $700 so a precédént would not be sel with Council developing a policy for the future. / ?'IP I , - ... --- ~.~._._-- .. -"- .°n___. _...._ _ _ _____._____ ATTACHMENT B MINUTES Special Workshop Meeting LffiRARYBOARD OF TRUSTEES JUNE 19, 1996 LffiRARY CONFERENCE ROOM 4:00 PM BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Clover-Byram, Vice Chair Williams, Trustees Alexander, and Viesca BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Trustee Donovan CITY STAFF PRESENT: Library Director Palmer, Principal Librarian Brown OTHERS PRESENT: David Perez, Ron Thomas, Betty Roche, Robert Coye, Harry LaBore This special meeting was called to develop a list of options for which the quarter cent sales tax could be used. Director Palmer gave the Trustees a brief overview of the quarter cent sales tax proposal and the urgency legislation required to place this measure on the November ballot. Staff suggestions for use of the funds included: 1. Construction of the Rancho del Rey Library. This would require approximately 9.5 million dollars. DIF fees would reimburse the City for this construction and could be used to operate the facility for the first nine years. 2. The remaining 5.5 million dollars could be used for operations to: - Implement new technologies - Improve children's services - Improve hours at the South Chula Vista Library - Improve book budget - Improve Literacy services The Chairs of the Friends Umbrella Group and the Friends of the Civic Center and South Chula Vista Library were called upon for comment at this point and concurred with the Trustee's recommendations. Mr. Thomas suggested the addition of support technicians for the technology that is being added and the addition of a young adult librarian. Mr. LaBore suggested the expansion of the Historical Museum. /7-/1 ---~,._,---",,,-,,.----.---. - -..-.----...-- ."..- --'--"-'-'-'~~-'---"" Library Board of Trustees Page Two MSUC (Alexander/Williams) to suggest a greater proportion of the money would be used to build the EI Rancho Del Rey Library in conjunction with DIF funds for operations, the balance would be spend for the improvement and implementation of new technologies, the book budget and children's and young adult services. The meeting adjourned at 5: 15 pm. 17-/;2.. ~....m _"''ON _____. ____~__._~__.._ I RESOLUTION NO. 18335 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TAKING A POSITION TO SUPPORT SB 1958 AND TO SUPPORT A RELATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY PROPOSAL FOR A 1/4 CENT 5-YEAR SALES TAX FOR LIBRARIES WHEREAS, citizens throughout the San Diego County region rely on their community libraries for a variety of services; and WHEREAS, current funding levels are insufficient to provide for essential library programs and operations; and WHEREAS, a number of library facilities are in desperate need of repair, remodeling or expansion to properly serve library patrons; and WHEREAS, hours of operation have been reduced for many libraries due to funding constraints; and WHEREAS, current funding levels are insufficient to pay for an information-age library system; and WHEREAS, libraries serve youngsters from pre-school to college, parents and seniors, as well as businesses; and , WHEREAS, libraries are a vital part of each community; and WHEREAS, a sales tax rate increase of one-quarter cent .for a period of five years would generate approximately $50 million annually for the entire region and approximately $3 million annually for the City of Chula Vista; and WHEREAS, legislation is needed to authorize the voters of San Diego County to vote to impose a sales tax to be used exclusively for library purposes; and WHEREAS, urgency legislation is needed before August 9, 1996 to permit the ballot measure to be placed on the November 5, 1996 ballot; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista has been contacted by the County of San Diego regarding this proposal; and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Library Trustees voted unanimously at its May 29, 1996 meeting to support this proposal. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby support adoption of urgency legislation to permit the voters of San Diego County to consider a one-quarter cent sales tax rate increase for five years to be used exclusively for library improvements as i~ may be pursued via S8 1958 or other legislation yet to be drafted. /7-/3 . Resolution 18335 Page 2 t . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista urges all members of the San Diego Legislative Delegation and the Governor to support such legislation, Presented by Approved as to form by ~/~ Û-- ~ Y"Y'L ~"'-P _ Ann y, Moore Shirley, Horto Assistant City Attorney Mayor , \ ! . i . 17-J'/ I I I - _.~_._.. -- ---..-------.-->----.--- - -+ --~- - - --"- - Resolution 18335 Page 3 t i PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 11 th day of June, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Alevy, Padilla, Rindone, Horton NA YES: Councilmembers: Moot ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None ¿Úf1/~ ~J'Ãx.¡ S . ley Horton, Mayor ATTEST: ~ Ô a~(]£ Beverly . Authelet, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) 55. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 18335 was duly passed, approved, and adoPted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 11 th day of June, 1996. Executed this 11th day of June, 1996. ~ () tLmtil Beverly . Authelet. City Clerk . /7'-/>' I - -- _..__....~_.__. -----------.. THIS PACE BLANK ¡?"../¡, COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /y Meeting Date 7/16/96 ITEM TITLE: Report on the Re-establishment of the University Task Force Resolution I "'{~~priating $10,000 from the unappropriated General Fund balance for Professional Services Related to Biological Analysis of University Site Alternatives SUBMITTED BY: Assistant City Manage~ Director of Planning REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes--X..No_) ...-. In November 1995, Council received a report from staff regarding the status of the proposed university site which is designated in the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP). In response to this report, Council directed staff to have the City's legislative lobbyist promote the selection of the Otay Ranch university site by the University of California, and also appropriated funds to hire a consultant to assist in monitoring the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) and other programs which could affect the future use of the university site. Council also stated that consideration should be given to reviving the University task force. On May 28, 1996, the City Council authorized staff to include draft policy language relating to the proposed university site in the City's MSCP Subarea Plan to ensure that a range of habitat preserve plan alternatives would be adequately analyzed within the Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the MSCP. This analysis is expected to be completed later this year. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1) reestablish the University Task Force, to work with City staff in evaluating the currently designated University site, as well as other options which are being evaluated in conjunction with the MSCP; 2) appropriate $10,000 to allow the City to retain a biological consultant to continue to provide assistance and input regarding the biological analysis of the University site in the MSCP. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. 18"-/ Page 2, Item _ Meeting Date 7/16/96 DISCUSSION: UDdate on University Site Issues On May 28, 1996, the City Council directed staff to include the following as a range of alternatives in the City's Draft Subarea Plan to be analyzed in the Draft EIR/EIS for the MSCP relative to siting the university: The Existing General DeveloDment Plan alternative in the City's overall MSCP Subarea Plan would continue to include the existing designated Otay Ranch university site, including the 400 acres east of Villages 9 and 10; The Modified General DeveloDment Plan alternative would include consideration of two policy options: a) designation of a reconfigured and reduced university site east of Villages 9 and 10, which would include approximately 288 acres, and would reduce impacts on habitats in comparison to the university site designation in the adopted Otay Ranch GDP; and b) purchase of a portion of the currently designated university site by the wildlife agencies for inclusion in the preserve system, and acquisition of an alternative university site, which would be acceptable to the City of Chula Vista, through a land exchange or other acceptable mechanism. Attached are minutes from the City Council meeting of May 28, as well as a letter from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game, which address this matter. Staff will be coordinating with the City of San Diego and the resource agencies to ensure that adequate environmental analysis is conducted on the above alternatives, so that all parties can evaluate the results, and make a final determination regarding the consequences of continuing to pursue development of the proposed university site location. It is expected that the EIR/EIS will be available for public review in late August this year and that Council will be asked to make final decisions on the MSCP and Subarea Plan in late 1996. Re-establish the Universitv Task Force In 1990, the City Council appointed a task force to promote the site proposed on the Otay Ranch as the preferred site for the next Southern California campus of the University of California. Membership of the University of California at Chula Vista (UCCV) Task Force consisted of a total of 21 individuals selected from the community. This membership included representatives / '8' ' .).. Page 3, Item _ Meeting Date 7/16/96 from the Baldwin Company, Chamber of Commerce, Southwestern College and other prominent local individuals interested in attracting a major four university to the Southbay. Since the adoption of the Dtay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) in 1993, the UCCV Task Force has not met. As a result of current preserve planning programs (e.g., MSCP, Federal Wildlife Refuge, etc.) that have the potential to affect the ultimate siting of the proposed university site, staff is recommending that Council re-establish the University Task Force. Attached is a copy of the previous membership list for the Task Force (Attachment 3). The Assistant to the Mayor and Council will provide staff support to the Task Force, with technical assistance from the Planning Department and City Manager's office, as they review and consider the status of the currently designated University site, as well as the other options discussed above. Retention of Professional Consulting Services In November, 1995, Council authorized staff to retain professional services to assist staff in ensuring that opportunities for university-related uses were not eliminated, and that the future ownership of these properties was not conveyed in a manner that would preclude such future uses. Staff retained the services of Ms. Rikki Alberson (biologist) and have utilized the services of Ms. Alberson in review of plan documents and negotiations with the resource agencies relating to the university site up to this point. The funding for these services has been nearly exhausted at this point. In order to provide similar professional assistance during the next phase of review of these issues in the final draft MSCP, staff is recommending that the City Council appropriate an additional $10,000 for professional services. It is proposed that Ms. Alberson be retained to continue to provide this professional assistance during the next phase. FISCAL IMPACT: Proposed consulting services are estimated to cost approximately $10,000, to be allocated from the unappropriated General Fund balance. Attachments 1. City Council Minutes from 5/28/96 meeting 2. Letter to Mayor Horton from Michael Spear, Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Ronald D. Rempel, California Department of Fish and Game 3. Membership List for UCCV Task Force (m:\home\planning\mscp\univtskf.113) I?" 3"'t l' RESOLUTION NO. J ð":J '/:L RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $10,000 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED GENERAL FUND BALANCE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY SITE ALTERNATIVES AND REESTABLISHING THE UNIVERSITY TASK FORCE WHEREAS, in 1990, the city Council appointed 21 individuals to a task force to promote the site proposed on the Otay Ranch Project as the preferred site for the Southern California campus of the University of California; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 1995, the City Council received a report from staff regarding the status of the proposed university site which is designated in the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP); and WHEREAS, in response to this report, Council directed staff to have the city's legislative lobbyist promote the selection of the Otay Ranch university site by the University of California, and also appropriated funds to hire a consultant to assist in monitoring the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) and other programs which could affect the future use of the university site; and WHEREAS, Council also stated that consideration should be given to reviving the University Task Force; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 1996, the City Council authorized staff to include draft policy language relating to the proposed university site in the City's MSCP Subarea Plan to ensure that a range of habitate preserve plan alternatives would be adequately analyzed within the Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the MSCP. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby reestablish the University Task Force, to work with city staff in evaluating the currently designated University site, as well as other options which are being evaluated in conjunction with the MSCP. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby appropriate $10,000 from the General Fund into Account 100-210-5201 to allow the City to retain a biological consultant to continue to provide assistance and input regarding the biological analysis of the University site in the MSCP. Presented by Approved as to form by ~~ , 't f l1 t" Robert A. Le1ter, D1rec or 0 Ann Y. Moore, In er1m C1ty Planning Attorney C:\rs\uccy /%'5 ~ ~~(l ATTACHMENT 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FROM 5/28/95 MEETING /8" '/ .-.-. ",-,-..--~"---".-,-,,,.- - . Minutes May 28, 1996 17. REPORT MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM (MSCP) - OT A Y RANCH UNIVERSITY SITE - ON 5/21/96, Council provided direction to staff regarding draft ·Subarea Plans· for Chula Vista to be analyzed in the final draft Environmental Impact Report/Stat~ment for the MSCP. The Council deferred action regarding delineation of the Otay Ranch University Site, pending further discussion with the wildlife agencies. Staff recommends Council accept the report. (Director of Planning) Continued from the meeting of 5/21/96. Roboort Leiter, Director of Planning, stated staff recommended that the final draft ElR for the MSCP include two alternatives: 1) reflecting the adopted Otay Ranch General Development Plan and university site designation; and 2) consideration of two policy options, i.e. (a) designation of a reconfigured and reduced university site east of Villages 9 and 10 which would include approximately 288 acres and reduce impacts, and (b) consider the purchase of the 400 acre portion of the currently designated university site by th~ wildlif~ agencies for inclusion into the presorve system and acquisition of an aitemative univ~rsity site acceptabl~ to the city through a land exchange or other acc~ptable mechanism. The second altemative came out of discussions with th~ wildlife ag~ncies and would be subject to certain principles set forth in the letter. Staff would work with th~ university task force to ~valuate other alternative sites for consideration while the biological analysis was prepared on the two alternatives as part of the EIR. Staff would return with final recommendations on th~ issue. A leU~r had """n received from the Endangered Habitats League raising specific concerns r~garding that approach. . Rod Davis, 46 Center Street, Chula Vista, CA, past m~mboor of th~ UCCV Task Forc~, stated it scared him to hear staff talk about an alternate site. The document regarding roquir~ments for a university sit~ was approximat~ly 150 pages and one Was a specific description of topography, water view, etc. The on~ sit~ was unique and fit most of the requirements. He requested that Council not tak~ action until roviewing th~ docum~nt to see if there were any other compatible sites within the city. The univ~rsity claimed that they would bring $100 million to the community. He urged Council to move slowly in putting the property in th~ proserv~ when it could possibly be the only site in town. Council member Rindone did not feel there was another site and that Mr. Davis was correct. If Council proceeded it was a vote against the university in Chula Vista. He was disappointed in the staff recommendation and would not support the request. . Michael Beck, P. O. Box 841, Julian, CA, representing the Endang~red Habitats League, clarified that he had , """ñ informed that their letter could be considered a thn,at and that was not their int~nt. Their position had been consistent over the years, i.e. the resource value of th~ area should determine the land use if th~ city participated in the MSCP program. If the decision. based on the resource valu~, was that a univ~rsity sit~ was not allowed there, Villages 9 and 10 were adoquate, which they supported. It was a qu~stion of booing abl~ to reconcile two conflicting desires, i.e. a desire to participate in the program aód th~ boonefits of th~ MCCP program, and to have a specific university site which was in th~ middl~ ofsignificant habitat and would probably not be p~rmitabl~ from th~ir position. They supported a site in Villages 9 and 10. Council member Moot stated his position had also """n consist~nt from wh~n h~ was on th~ Planning Commission. He fdt the 400 acres should be designated as a possibility, but it could be that th~ Endangered Habitats Leagu~ was correct and that no university could build in the-area due to the rosourc~s involved. To giv~ it up betor~ it had """n I~"r -,.. '..".~~"" . ~"., - -- --.-.--.-.- -- ------.- ,--- ---_._._----_.~- - Minutes May 28, 1996 Page 13 planned or looked at did not make any sense. The 400 acres did not make or brw the viability of the MSCP preserve. · Councilmember Rindone stated be agreed with Council member Moot's comments. Council needed to be vigilant in their efforts to make it clear that it would not be included. MOTION: (Rindone) to table the item. Councilmember Moot stated the message to staff should be clear, i.e. Council wanted every effort made to the preserve the university site. COUDcilmember Padilla stated a previous designation was not being deleted nor would Council be limiting their flexibility. It would allow for language in the MSCP for alternatives. The original applicant had given up a lot and the ability to attract a university to Chula Vista was critical. The staff recommendation would allow flexibility. · Mr. Leiter responded that the two altematives would be forwarded to the City of San Diego for inclusion into the fmal MSCP EIR and they would then be studied within the EIR. Staff would return to Council with a final recommendation when the study was completed. MOTION: (Padilla) to approve tbe staff recommendation. Councilmember Rindone questioned what the impact would be of his motion. Mr. Leiter replied that staff would have to retum to Council for further direction if the implication was that staff was to study only the university site as designated in the Otay Ranch GDP. Councilmember Rindone stated that was his intent and felt it sent a strong message to staff and everyone else that the university site set aside was extremely important to the city. n · SECOND TO MOTION TO TABLE: (Alevy) motion failed 2-3 with Horton, Moot, and Padilla opposed. MSC (PadillalHorton) to approve staff recommendation, approved 4-1 with Rindone opposed. --- -- --- ~ . J 8",-1 LETTER TO MAYOR HORTON FROM MICHAEL SPEAR, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, AND RONALD REMPEL, CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF FISH & GAME It?'", /0 rr=--- r¡:¡ C' .. __c. II Î! )i.Je).-;: .... ~:- .~ U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service ~ ì ' -. CA Dept. ofFish and Game .......ua.t.... -~ ~ ....do ."'.... Cornp]~ C:.t!I J I" 1416 Nm<b S_ o . 911 N.E. lIth Avenue L.. -.p O. Box 944209 N, .:r. Portland, Oregon 97232-418 C(,;:;;:Tlõii: . ';. acramento, CA 94244-2090 "'..-.... C. ;:J,,~ V!\'¡~ r ",.." May 23, 1996 Honorable Shirley Horton Mayor of the City ofChula Vista 276 4th Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Dear Mayor Horton: The California Department ofFish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (conectively the Wildlife Agencies) appreciate the significant effort the City ofChula Vista (City) has made in developing a Chula Vista Subarea Plan for incorporation into the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) plan. It appears that we are in significant agreement on issues related to the future configuration of the preserve and the habitat that will be authorized for take pursuant to Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) Act and the State and Federal Endangered Species Acts except with regards to the use of Salt Creek land as a future university campus. The proposed university site as described in the Otay Ranch Project's General Development Plan includes lands within Villages 9 and 10 and portions of Salt Creek easterly to Wueste Road. The Otay Ranch university site was selected to provide the local community with an opportunity to actively pursue the siting of a University of California campus or similar university within the City. The Wildlife Agencies have ar.alyzed the biological resources present on the portion of City's proposed university site east of Salt Creek. The analysis provided to the City at a meeting between the Wildlife Agencies and the City on May 21, 1996, indicates that the proposed development on the site would result in substantial adverse impacts to regional populations of California gnatcatchers and cactus wrens. A!J a result of the analysis, the City and the Wildlife Agencies have agreed to identifY alternative sites to accommodate a university within the City's sphere of influence. Relocation of the university site win ensure that an Otay Ranch project lands in Salt Creek and easterly to Wueste Road (Wueste Road Property) are conserved as part of the MSCP plan. Alternative 1m in the City's Subarea Plan designates this area as conserved and it win be analyzed as such in the MSCP's environmental documents under the MHP A alternative. Alternative IIA in the City's Subarea Plan will also be analyzed in the environmental documents. . . Jff.... /1 - _.- Honorable Shirley Horton May 23, 1996 Page 2 The Wildlife Agencies propose that the parties develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOD) that sets out a process and timeframe under which an alternative university site is identified and acquired. The Wildlife Agencies propose that the following principles guide the development of the MOU: · the parties to the MOU will use their best efforts and available resources to carry out their respective obligations under the MOU; · the uses on the alternative university site will be limited to its use as a university which would be at least equivalent to a California State University in stature and educational programs; · land acquisitions and exchanges will be carried out consistent with the State and Federal laws, regulations and rules for such transactions; · acquisition of the Wueste Road site as a preserve site would be in the general time frame of its anticipated transfer to the Preserve Owner Operator as detailed in the Sectional Plan Area One; · the resources to acquire the Wueste Road site may come from a variety of sources, including state and federal appropriations and land holdings, and other sources associated with implementation of the MSCP; · the acquisition of the alternate university site will be contingent on appropriate zoning of the site by the city; and · the document transferring the alternate university site to the City will include a reversion clause which incorporates the time frame for developing the university specified in the Otay Ranch General Development Plan. The Wildlife Agencies would like to move forward with completing the MOU regarding the university and we would appreciate the City identifying any steps that will have to be taken prior the development of the MOU. Mr. Gail Kobetich will be the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service contact and Mr. Ron Rempel will be the Department ofFish and Game contact for developing the MOU. They can be contacted at (619) 431-9440 and (916) 654-9980, respectively. Sincerely, If! ~~~~~ ar Ronald D. Rempel Regi al Director NCCP Program Manager U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service California Department ofFish and Game cc: See next page. 18'~/~ "---".,--- -..-. I Honorable Shirley Horton May 23,1996 Page 3 cc: Mr. Gail Kobetich U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento, California Mr. Michael A. Mantell The Resources Agency Sacramento, California Ms. Karen Scarborough City of San Diego San Diego, California Mr. Robert Leiter City of Chula Vista Chula Vista, California Mr. Marc Ebbin Department ofInterior San Francisco, California c..;-y CQunG, I c:.e><:;$ --Joh n Norris, ~;d Moorc, A ()f1 . ,/?'/3 .- .~- - -- - ~_.---.._._._. - -- ---- ---- ~---------_.__.._. .---.-" MEMBERSIDP LIST FOR UCCV TASK FORCE 19'/'1 A TT ACHMENT 3 UCCV TASK FORCE Rlldd Alberson Leonard M. Moore William S. Cannon Sid W. Morris Pat Cavanaugh Sandy Murphy Roderick F. Davis Tim Nader Baby Dalle Hancock Pat Patek Susan A. Herney Margie Phares Craig Higgs Ricardo Ruybalid Tris Hubbard Jo Sanzone George Kost Don Swanson Marilyn Lassman David "Bud" Wilson /ð',¡ß .-~- -----~_... THIS 'ACE BU.NK J8""/¿ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item I ~ Meeting Date 7/16/96 ITEM TITLE: Report Regarding Revisions to the Draft City of Chula Vista Subarea Plan for the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) SUBMITIED BY, o;=<o< of P¡"m;og f REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ /7 (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX) On May 21, 1996, the City Council con ted a public hearing on the City's draft Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan and directed staff to forward the draft Subarea Plan, along with Council's concerns, to the City of San Diego for inclusion in the environmental analysis (EIRlEIS) being conducted on the MSCP and associated Subarea Plans. Since that time, City staff have been meeting with the Wildlife Agencies to respond to their concerns with the draft Subarea Plan. Staff is requesting that Council authorize that revisions to the Subarea Plan be forwarded to the City of San Diego for inclusion in the EIRlEIS analysis. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize staff to forward the revised draft MSCP Subarea Plan to the City of San Diego for evaluation in the [mal draft EIRlEIS for the overall MSCP plan. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable. DISCUSSION: Background On May 21, 1996, the City Council conducted a public hearing to receive testimony from property owners and interested parties regarding the draft MSCP Subarea Plan. Council directed staff to forward the draft Subarea Plan to the City of San Diego for inclusion in the documents to be analyzed in the MSCP Environmental Impact Report 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIRlEIS). Subsequently, on May 28, 1996, Council further directed staff to include in the draft Subarea Plan, two alternatives for analysis regarding the university site proposed on the Otay Ranch. Staff forwarded the draft Subarea Plan to the City of San Diego as directed. However, the United States Fish & Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish & Wildlife (Wildlife Agencies), co-leads in the preparation of the draft EIRlEIS, have since met with J,"/ .. Page 2, Item _ Meeting Date 7/16/96 Planning Department staff to discuss format and other relatively minor revisions to the draft Subarea Plan. Subarea Plan Revisions Revisions requested by the Wildlife Agencies are reflected in the attached redline/strike version of the Subarea Plan text. The most significant revision to the text involves re-positioning the two plan alternatives discussed therein. The following is a summary of significant revisions proposed in the Subarea Plan: 1) Previously identified Subarea Plan Alternative One (representing existing approved development plans) is now be identified as the "Existing GDP Alternative." Previously identified Subarea Plan Alternative Two (representing modifications to the Otay Ranch and San Miguel Ranch General Development Plans per tentative agreements with the Wildlife Agencies) is now identified as the "Modified GDP Alternative" (See Section 4.0 and Tables 1 & 2). Rationale for Modification: The Wildlife Agencies have indicated that the proposed change to identify the Modified GDP Alternative first in the Subarea Plan is because, of the two alternatives identified in the Subarea Plan, this alternative would result in "take authorization" (local permitting authority where sensitive species are impacted) for the area covered by the Subarea Plan, and the alternative that would be consistent with the MSCP policies and plans. This approach would be consistent with the structure of their biological opinion on the draft MSCP and other Subarea Plans. 2) Clarification that "take authorization" will only apply to areas annexed into the City (See Sections 4.0 & 7.2.4.1). Rationale for Modification: The Wildlife Agencies wanted it made clear that "take authorization" will only be granted for those areas that are within the jurisdictional boundaries and control of the City of Chula Vista. In instances where conserved portions of a project actually remain in the unincorporated County areas, the development permits will take into consideration these conserved open space areas. 3) Clarification of the terms of agreement between the San Miguel Ranch property owner and the Wildlife Agencies regarding a reversionary clause that would be enacted if the Wildlife Agencies are unable to acquire potential development areas on the North Parcel of San Miguel Ranch (See Sections 4.2.1.1.2 & 4.2.1.1.4). Rationale for Modification: The revised language reflects the terms of an agreement between the Wildlife Agencies and the landowner onlv. This paragraph does not commit the City to any specific development levels on the North Parcel in the event that /9- .,2 .-.- Page 3, Item _ Meeting Date 7/16/96 acquisition does not occur within prescribed time period. The City Council will still have independent authority on any decisions on a proposed revision to the development project, as well as on the final adoption of the MSCP Subarea Plan. 4) Added section addressing the placement of conservation easements on public lands owned by the City of Chula Vista that are located within the preserve boundaries. These lands consist of primarily open space district properties (See Section 6.2.3.2). Rationale for Modification: The Wildlife Agencies indicated to City staff that those properties deeded to the City for open space purposes and are designated within the "preserve" were not addressed under the Public Lands section of the Subarea Plan. 5) Establish that future active recreation areas within the Otay River VaÜey not preclude biological connections between the riparian river valley and habitat located on valley slopes (See Section 6.3.2.1). Rationale for Modification: The Wildlife Agencies requested that stronger language be placed in the Subarea Plan which would assure that future design efforts for active recreation within the Otay River Valley address the need for important biological connections. 6) Clarification that a Fire Management Plan will be prepared as a component of a Preserve Management Plan within one year of adoption of an Implementing Agreement (See Section 6.4.3). Rationale for Modification: The Wildlife Agencies recommended language changes that indicate that the Fire Management Plan (addressing brush management activities) be consistent with County- wide standards being developed in conjunction with the San Diego Fire Chief's Association with other fire protection organizations. 7) Deletion of a requirement for the entity conducting biological activities to "indemnify the underlying landowner against any and all actions that could arise out of the approved activities" (See Section 6.4.8.3). Rationale for Modification: The Wildlife Agencies requested that this section be deleted from the Subarea Plan, expressing their concern that indemnification to land owners for biological or scientific activities to be conducted on private properties was too broad in scope. This issue may be better addressed through provisions contained within the "Implementation Agreement" 19"':; Page 4, Item _ Meeting Date 7/16/96 (A contractual agreement between the City and the Wildlife Agencies on the terms of "take authorization" associated with the Subarea Plan). 8) Clarification of mitigation ratios for Tier III Upland mitigation (See Table 3). Rationale for Modification: Changes to Table 3 were necessary to respond to concerns expressed previously by the EastLake Development Company and the Wildlife Agencies. These changes are consistent with mitigation ratios identified by the City of San Diego for their preserve plans. 9) Clarification of "minor" and "major amendment" criteria to the Subarea Plan (See Sections 9.1 & 9.2). Rationale for Modification: The Wildlife Agencies requested that these two sections addressing amendments to the Subarea Plan be refined to: a) clarify reporting responsibilities for future minor amendments, and b) establish that major amendments to the Subarea Plan will be required for those properties, assumed to be conserved subject to tentative agreements, if acquisition by the Wildlife Agencies does not occur. Staff has evaluated these proposed changes, and finds that they are appropriate and consistent with previous Council direction on these matters. We have also notified major property owners within the MSCP planning area of these proposed changes. Next SteDs Following authorization by the City Council to forward the revised draft City of Chula Vista Subarea Plan to the City of San Diego for analysis in the final draft MSCP and draft EIR/EIS, the City of San Diego and its consultants expect that the documents will be completed and available for public review and comment by late August, 1996. They will be brought back for further review and public hearings by the City of Chula Vista and other participating jurisdictions in September or October 1996. In addition, it will be necessary for the City to enter into an Implementation Agreement, as well as approve necessary General Development Plan amendments and ordinance amendments, in order for the MSCP Subarea Plan to be fully implemented. /1"''1 Page 5, Item _ Meeting Date 7/16/96 FISCAL IMPACT: As described for Council during their previous review of the draft Subarea Plan, the final draft MSCP Plan will include an updated fiscal and economic analysis of the overall program. Attachments: I) Minutes from May 21, 1996, City Council meeting. 2) Draft City of Chula Vista Subarea Preserve Plan for the Multiple Species Conservation Program, dated July 1, 1996. (M:IHOMEIPLANNINGlMSCPIREVISION .AII) /9~3 ~ A/!.~ 11)1 ATI'ACHMENT 1 MINUTES FROM MAY 21, 1996, CITY COUNCIL MEETING -I- . ....-.".'"" - .... -.- - - -- .~ _._-~.. - ---- THIS PAGE BLANK . -~- .. .---- - , ---... - . -- -- --.- 17. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF,. DRAn SUBAREA PRESERVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF CHULA VlST A GENERAL PLANNING AREA . The City is pnpariø,a draft Subarea... erve PIaD wbicb iI iDleDded to ¡~, the draft Multiple Speciea CoaMrvatiOD PIo¡ram (MSCP) for Ibe _tile a..... Vista GeDeraJ PIaaaiD¡ _. The MSCP isa cooperative effort by Ibe City of SuI Dieao; the County of SuI Dieao; the citiea of SuItee, Poway. aad a.ula Vista; oilier jllrildictioas iD the aoutbwakml _ of SuI Dieao County; IIaIe ud federal wildlife aieaciea; other special pIUJIOIO a,OIICiea; and repNIOIItativea of the land developmeat indllllty ud eavÍl'OlllDellIal orpIIÍDIiODl. Staff ncommeacls CowK:iI provide policy clirectiOD re¡ardiD, the Subana Preserve PIaII aad directltaff to forward the draft PIaII to Ibe City of San Die,o for iDc:lusioo iøto Ibe eaviroamealal _lylÚ' doc:umcnt for the MSCP. (Director of PlumiDa) Continued from the meelina or 5/14196. · · · Councilmember Moot left Ibe dais at 6:37 p.m. and ntumed at 6:40 p.m. · . . ~ · · · Councilmember Rindonoo left Ibe dai. at 6:38 p.m. ud rIIIumed at 6:45 p.m. . . . 0-.. Robert Leiter. Dinc:tor of Plumia., ¡ave a brief history of the MSCP. Staff _-lied Cot'ncil -.done the ~ policy posiliaas to be iDc:luded iD the fmal draft MSCP plan. Staff would submit the draft Sube_ PIaD for the ~ 01111. Vista Plannia, Area to the City of San Die,o for inclusiOD iD the overall ElR for the MSCP PIaII. Staff -ad _ ia _ week with a RICOIIIIIIIWIatÏOll nprdia, a university lite. 'Ibis beiDa the tïa. ud plaœ as advertised, the public bearin, was declared opea. '\\ . 'U Xaty Wript. ( () Lane Aveaue, a..... Vista, CA. E¡'''I.alce DoweIopmeat CœJpany. asked tbat prior to fiDalizatiOD or the pIaa aad deveJopmeat of the impIemaatatiOD .._meat that aeveraI __ of ambi¡uity be clarified, i.e, bow !bey would be ùnpIcted by the ~ ve Ihould they have miti,aIÏoII __ 011 lite aad bow Ibe ptoperty would be deaipated as either _-utive ,rusland or .aricultunl. A¡ricuItunI did DOl have mitipliOD nquiNlllellta. They would IXIIIMue to walk with ltaff. ---- - -.- "'- -- -- -- - (~~~) ~ "._, " / 3- ...-' -- .'''''''''..-.-- .....=:..-:,,:::::~"._. -.~ . MiDutes May 21, 1996 PAle 5 . . Kim JCilkeany, 11975 EI r..m;"" Real, SUI DieIlO,CA, Villap DeveJopa.t, IUppOrtecltbulaff I'IICOIIUIIeIIC plan. He _ addreainll!be __ _trolled by Villalle ~ wilbiD OIay Raøcb oaIy. 11Iey bad DOl been iDvolved wilb ataff ,.udinll !be llllivenity lile u tbat _ . aepuate M OIiaIioa betw_ ataff aDd !be .,.ourc:e a¡eacies, Mucb of !be detail of !be plan would be iDcorponted iDlo impI_tatioa 81'- ..... aDd !bey _ted 10 WOItt wilb ataff duriDlI tbat ...- u it would be .. ÎIIIpOItaIIt aDd rIeIiCllw 11II of 4/i-';ons. · Dale McFetrid¡e, FDIC, atated !bey __ iDvoIved wilb !be Suabow project aDd ÏI_ DOl cI_ wIw put of tbeir project would be iDcorpontød; Mr. Leiter reapoDCIed tbat !be __ propœed for delipatioa u put of !be ... J I I rAt ayIIem __ ideøtica110 !be -- tbat __ deaipated u permaneot Opea apace iD !be app,oved SPA Plan, "1'1""" _talive map, aDd !be Sectioa 7 permit tbat bad been iIIued by !be US Filii It Wildlife Service for !be property. It _ . portioa of Poaee CaIIyoa wilbiD !beir property. . Then beiDa DO furtbet leIIimooy, !be public bearÍII, _ declared cIoaed. CouncjJmember Moot questiOlled if !be city was IIIbmillÏDlI two "1eI'IIaI.ivea for coaIidentiOll. Mr. Leiter nIpODded tbat ODe ..ternative would ",nee! !be city'. adopted GeøeraI Plan aDd a-J Development PIaDs; !be aecond "ternative would ",nect additional opeD apace beinll preMI'Yed per _talive apeements wilb Ibe Baldwin CoIll llllY, GIber DOII-BaldwiD property ~en iD Clay RaDcb, and Emerald Properties wilb SUI Mip IùDch. Councilmember Moot atated tbat it appeared tbat !be puticipatioa 011 bebalf of !be federal aDd _ JOY- ¡ . would be !be donatiOll of land u opposed 10 what it would 0DIt 10 buy _ of !be land iD priVllO bands, . Mr. Leiter respoaded that !be federal and alate commi1malts iDcJuded pCIIIible _veyuce of land UDder Bureau of LaDd Mllllllemeøt _trol, bowever, !be federal and alate a¡enciea Juoullbt forwud !be coacepI of IIIiD& federal aDd atale fuDdiDlI pro'l'UIII for purchue of land from priVllO property -.. It would be . combÏl\llioa of land aDd l\mdiD,. No ODe local juriadictioa would be apecifica1ly commillold 10 fund land acquilitioa. bui tbere would be . ,.ioaal fuDdiDlI pro,_ punuecl tbroullb . nllioaalllltity. 11Ie commim-t beiD, NI IIIIIe I from local a¡eacies was 10 participale aDd cooperate iD PUIlÏDIlIo¡etber tbat ,.ioaaI I\mdÌDJ effort. . TIle tbitd put of !be acquilitioa prollraJD would be _ions wbicb would require property -. 10 dedicate property into !be ayIIem u put of tbeir development approv.... CcIIuaI'il............ Alevy q-uoaed wIw Ibe ftacaJ impact miabt be 10 !be city. Mr. Leiter naponded tbat !be direct COlIS would be limited because _ oftbe land iD!be ClluIa Viata portioa of . !be ~e would be put iD tbrou,b !be euction...-. 11Ie..-valioa of !be p.~ wilbiD !be city'. plumÏDlI.... would be bandied tbrou,b opeD apace diltrictathat __ let up for iadividual projects. Then would be _ plarmiD" coonIiDatioa. and monitorinll activities. Staff did DOl beve . COlI estimate at !be preaeat time. Councilmember AlIIV)' queatioaed if Millia, uaei such u fumåJI, would be pmldfalbered. Mr. Leiter atated tbat would be tbe 1IIfr. ÍIIIeDt, but ataff Deed 10 I'CIIIIIIIt wilb !be wildlife aa-ies 10 _ bow it could be -.bliahed. · Rae Reraple, 1416 Knillbt S_. Sacrarao!DIo, CA, CA Fiab It 0-. atated ~y 27,000 __ would beve 10 be purcbued 10 fill out !be ..- .. desip. 11Ie _ and federal ~ __ committed 10 13,500 - of tbat. Tbey __ dedicatiDlI all !be IaDda tbat the _ cumady __ either iD the ~t of Put. It Recreatioa (M. lor ICIive ncnatioa __ and land the Deputmeat of Fiab It Game own) aDd !be BLM. . . . None of tbat land would count. toward the 13.500 _ LaDd eacbaD,.. would occur, but it would be land outIide . of the ~....... They amidered it. Ioalllerm project. Tbey would look at .. dill bad tJu.ta to tbeir land at !be preaeat time alOIIJ wilb diffCNDIIicton of biolOJica1 imporIaace. MSUC (Al"7/HOI'toII) to approY.e- the ataf1' .--nmendatioa: c.mco prowlcle poIIq dInctioa l'llianIi.. the SubanIII\ H !I"Je Plan ~..dirict ItafI' to IDNUd the draft plan to the City or Srm Ðiep lar iDcIusIon Jato ..-.-. _. '- ---.. the enYiroMlental ualJIIa ......_, lar the MSCP. Stall to ntum with. nport I'fIII'IIinI the university . lite. . . , L . no _ ( _ ._ ____ . . ATIACHMENT 2 DRAFT CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBAREA PRESERVE PLAN FOR THE MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM, DATED JULY 1, 1996 - - 5- .....- --..--..-..- . ~ - TInS PAGE BLANK -&- - ·:~»:;':;::,::;:)h:{::i:8~~:::àig~ ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFI' CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBAREA PLAN FOR THE MULTIPLE SPECmS CONSERVATION PROGRAM Prepared by the City of Cbula Vista pI"nnll1g Department . July 11, 1996 - 1- --.-.. ,- - - -.- --. .- ._---- THIS PAGE BLANK . - g~ City of Chu/o V"trta MSCP Subøl'tO PMM"f Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa2e 1.0 IN'rRODUcnON .............................................. 1 2.0 CONSISTENCY WITH Mm:nPLE SPECIES CoNSERVATION PROGRAM. . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 3.0 SUBAREA PLAN ÁLTERNA11VES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ....0 DEsCRIPl'lON OF THE CIIuLA VISI'A SUBAREA .......................... 3 øØ1lØØQ~\Ø»D~ I \RI!t -PI'~ ~~':¡:PZ¡; Qþ¡¡; «.......:....... ....:.........;::::..... ,.~@.::~.' ..;0"". ""0:;'x";~'":. :'?..w. - - - --. .- . ·.~·,.wu.·,w."'.·,·.w.'".w...·.wu,. ..., _. .w.· ,.... ., , 4.1 City Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.1.1 Private Projects in the City Component .......................5 4.1.1.1 Bonita Long eanÿon ............................ 5 4.1.1.2 Salt Creek I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1.1.3 Rancho Del Rey ............,.................. 6 4.1.1.4 Terra Nova . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1.1.5 Salt Creek Ranch .............................. 8 4.1.1.6 'Mid-Bayfront . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.1.1.7 Sunbow n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.1.8 EastLake . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 4.1.1.9 Other Private Properties ..........................11 4.1.2 Public/Quasi-Public LandslProjects in the City Component . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.1.2.1 Sweetwater Valley Regional Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,11 4.1.2.2 Port District Jurisdiction ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.1.2.3 Otay Valley Regional Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 4.2 Bonita Component ....................................... .12 4.2.1 Private Projects in the Bonita Component ..................... 12 4.2.1.1 San Miguel Ranch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 4.2.1.2 Other Private Properties .......................... 13 4.2.2 Public/Quasi-Public LandsIProjects in the 'Bonita Component ......... 13 4.2.2.1 San Diego Gas & Electric ......................... 13 4.2.2.2 Otay Water District ................... . . . . . . . . . .13 4.2.2.3 Sweetwater Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13. 4.2.2,4 Sweetwater Valley Regional Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 . 4.2.2.5 Resolution Trust Corp,lRho. San Diego Mit. Parcel .......... 14 i -9- -_.-.- _._...._._n____ __ __ __ ._____ City ofChula Vrsto MSCP Subarea ,..,.,., Plan Pa2e 4.3 Otay Ranch Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 4.3.1 Private Projects in the Otay Rauch Component ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 4.3.1.1 Otay Rauch .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 4.3.1.2 Other Private Properties ........,................ .18 4.3:2 Public/Quasi-Public LandslProjects in the Otay Rauch Component . . . . . . 19 4.3.2.1 San Diego Water Utilities ........................ .19 4.3.2.2 Bureau of Land Management .................,..... 19 4.3.2.3 Otay Valley Regional Park. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 ~(~lllt.~~-\IŒA -JV_~ ..\I.'mR.~m~ Two 4.4 Bonita Component ...............................;...,... .21 4.4.1 San Miguel Ranch. . . . . : . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 4.5 Otay Ranch Component. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 4.5.1 Otay Rauch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 5.0 COVERED SPECIES LISl' ..........,..............,............. .29 6.0 LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . .31 6.1 Existing Standards, Ordinances and Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . , . . . .31 6.1.1 Federal ....,......................,............. .31 6.1.2 State . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .31 6.1.3 City of Chula Vista . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 6.2 Compatible Land Uses Within the Preserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .32 6.2.1 Existing Uses . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32 6.2.2 Public Access and Recreation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33 6.2.3 Public and Private Lands . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 6.3 Compatible Land Uses AcQacent to the Preserve ..................... 34 6.3.1 General Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 6.3.2 Project Specific Criteria ....................,...........35 6.4 General pII.nnl111 and Design Guidelines .......................... 38 6.4.1 Infrastructure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38 . 6.4.2 Roads .;.. '. . . . . . . , . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .' . . . . . . .39 6.4.3 Fire and BNSh Management .............................39 ü _1° - ~ - --~, -_.~ City of Chula V"am MSCP Subarea A-w.",.. Plan Pa2e - 6.4.4 Fencing, Lighting and Signage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 6.4.S Materials Storage ....................................40 6,4,6 Mining, Extraction and Processing Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 6.4.7 Flood Control ....................~..................40 6.4~8 Scientific and Biological Activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 6.5 Specific Project Exclusions .................................. .41 6.S.1 Otay Ranch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 6.5.2 Otay Valley Regional Park ...........,...............,. .42 6.5.3 Salt Creek Ranch ................................... .43 6.5.4 Sunbow ß . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43 7.0 PREsERVE MANAGEMENT ....,................................. .43 7.1 Plan Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43 7.2 Protection or Resources .....................................44 7.2.1 Interim Protection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,44 7.2.2 Agricultura1 Exemption ........~........................44 7.2.3 Permanent Protection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4S 7.2.4 Mitigation Plan .................................... .45 8.0 FuNDING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 9.0 SUBAREA PLAN AMENDMENTS ................................... .47 9.1 Minor Amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 9.2 Major Amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , .48 10.0 REFERENas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49 11.0 APPENDIX ................................................ .SO 11.1 BaldwlnTentativeAgreementExbibits ......................... .50 11.2 Implementing AgreementlManagement Authority .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SO 11.3 . Draft Otay V811ey Regional Park Concept Plan Diagram .............. SO 11.4 Vegetation Communities Within the Preserve by ~or Project .... . . . . . . SO '. . ill -1/ - q~ _.._......,,_u...._ ...,~___·.~__.___..._w . City of Chula Vtsto MSCP Subareo PNr'A'f Plan Pue LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1; Chula Vista Subarea Preserve Plan Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 Figure 2. Chula Vista Subarea Preserve Plan Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Vegetation Communities Within Multi-habitat Planning Areas - MðdifŒdnnp~fliS h PI \! . 1 36 . ,::....:,.,.:::.:...:_.:...:...':.::::::..);::-:::...:...::..;:..,:::é:.::..L....:::,:.:.::;::.:,:.:.:,:...:..f;,:.:," 11 8fe8 &B. tefBßü"¡e ......... Table 2. Vegêiâ.tiõïîc(ì"iñmWrltiešwHî1¡'¡, Multi-habitat planning Areas- ._!¡Grm¡~1P.1I9_B Pie AJtemati':e 2 . . . . . . . . .37 '::::;::'::;:;:':"":'::';:":.: . .'. .::::::;::~::::::~::::~:;::~:;:::;.,;~.;;;::~.::::, ;:;:::;::.x:,;,:::,,:,:,;::;: . Table 3. Uplands Mitigation Guidelines ....................,.....46 . iv -/~- City ofChula V"rsto MSCP Subarea PNrIl'l'f Plan CITY OF CHVLA VISTA MSCP SUBAREA PLAN 1.0 INTRODUCI10N The Multiple Species Conservation Program ("MSCP") is a comprehensive habitat conservation planning program being. developed by the City of San Diego, County of San Diego and eleven other local jurisdictions in southwestern San Diego County. . The total study area is 581,649 acres, of which 52,476 acres are contained within the General Plan area of the City of Chula Vista. The main text of the MSCP provides an overview and describes the goals of the entire program. This document describes the Chula Vista Subarea Plan, with specific information about the components of the MSCP that apply to the City of Chula Vista portion of the MSCP study area. The City of Chula Vista Subarea Plan ("Subarea Plan") was developed by the City's Planning Department in cooperation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("USFWS"), the California Department of Fish and Game ("CDFG"), property owners ind other interested persons. This subarea plan is a component of the MSCP which is incorporated herein by reference. The MSCP is a comprehensive habitat conservation planniT'lg program which addresses multiple species habitat needs and the preservation of natural communities for a 900-square mile area in southwestern San Diego County. It is one of three subregional habitat planniT'lg efforts in San Diego County. Tþe MSCP addresses the potential impacts of urban growth, loss of natural habitats, and species endangerment and develops a plan to mitigate for the loss of plant and wildlife species and habitat due to the direct and indirect impacts of future development of both private and public lands. The primary goals of the City's Subarea Plan are: 1) to reduce or eliminate red111vlant local, state and federal review of individual projects by obtaini1\g state and federal endangered species act take authorizations for 87 species, and 2) conserve habitat for covered species by creating a preserve system using a variety of techniques including land use regulations, on- and off~ite mitigation, and acquisition (local, state and federal funding sources). This Subarea Plan focuses on: 1) where the habitat will be conserved, 2) how much habitat (by habitat type) will be conserved, 3) mP.r.hani~m(s) which will be used to perm........ly protect the preserve (timing and dedications, mitigation) and the protection method (fee tide, conservation easement, etc.), and 4) preserve management (preserve management plan requirements, inteIim management, etc.). The City's preserve was developed using the design criteria in Section 3.2.5 of the MSCP. Boundary adjustments can be made without the need to amend this Subarea Plan or the MSCP in cases where a DeW preserve boundary would result in a preserve area of equivalent or higher value. The determination of the biological value of a proposed boundary change would be made by the City in accordance with Section 3.4.1 of the MSCP Plan, and with concurrence. of the wildlife agencies. The City intends to enter into an Implementing AgreementlManagement Authorization ("IA") with USFWS and CDFG~. . The IA may be ah..i1n in form and content to the final 1 -/3..... City ofChulo Vrsto MSCP Subaml PIw..... PIon "Model Implementing AgrecmcntlManagcmcnt Authorization" found in the MSCP. The IA docs not preclude landowners, the City and the Wildlife Agencies from entering into separate Conservation Agreements, which provide greater detail and assurances beyond those in this Subarea Plan. The City may enter into Conservation Agreements in connection with the implementation of this Subarea Plan, Provisions in Conservation Agreements shall be consistent with this Subarea Plan. The City's Subarea Plan boundary is primarily represented by the City's General Planning boundary. Approximately 3,997 acres located within the City's Subarea Plan, but owned or controlled by a public or quasi-public agency other than the City of ChuIa Vista, arc not covered by the City's Subarea Plan. These pwpcrties will be addressed through individual preserve plans prepared by these controlling agencies (e,g., water districts, Port Authority, etc.) (please see Figure 1). This plan is intended to identify major areas of open space and their implementation. During the development of this plan, efforts were made to accurately reflect approved projects. It is not intended that this document supersede the regulatory approval requirement for any property or that it supersede any condition in existing County permits or maps. Furthermore, if there is a conflict between the articles of this document and permit conditions, the permit conditions shall prevail. 2.0 CONSISl'ENCY wrm THE MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM The City of Chula Vista is preparing this Subarea Plan in response to direction from the Wildlife Agencies in an effort to meet the applicable requirements of the federal and state Enila"f¡cred Species Acts and the !!!Ji\!!;rliem!iIš!;!iilíllli,~¡I~CCPI Act. The City's Subarea Plan is intended to be consistent with the MSCP (please see Tables 2 & 3 for acreage comparisons) and with the Subarea Plan outline and standards agreed to by the Wildlife Agencies and the other jurisdictions and entities participating in the MSCP. This Subarea Plan, therefore, becomes a component of the MSCP upon the adoption of the Subarea Plan by the Chula Vista City Council. If any standards, regulations or requirements of the Subarea Plan conflict with those of the MSCP, the criteria of the Subarea Plan shall apply. 3.0 SUBAREA PLAN ALTERNATIVES The City's Subarea Plan has been prepared reflecting two alternative preserve designs. III IlDDmtaB1f.BmBllDllSYBAlÆt PMN AlmBlLtmll 9.\"B consists ofa reserve l8!l . ;;;.,......;::....;..,mL.·.·~....... H~·'v»:.:.x.'··..··*.~·v~¡.;.;.;.;.·,·.;.;.·v;.~ p p whièíî'¡S'giiicíécr by thê"^city'šcurient General Plan and previously approved development pIÚx;" aeteE\ etheI"IT;iøe, alll're:ieet desertpHsBS eeBtllmell IB tIHt Subarea PIe tIf(I IS_ell Ie refleet. SuI!IIfeII PIehkel'llllftve Oøe. "l~'____"t'&Y&t PE..i}.' AlJ'EBJ'¡',tmll TM'9 . all f the I ents of\ .. .'.... '" ·'·~;"'M8fea PleB .~l'IIIIti-le ORe with the contaìDS 0 e eJI1 ;:;~~ "~.x::::::::X:' .:x::>::::::;.s.:m:~ .. ':::~::::~ '.. . ':.;.' ' ,.... . exception of preserve areas within the San Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch projects, each ~. 2 - 1'1-- -_._-~,.__..- - City of Chu/a Vrstø MSCP Subøna """..... Plan 1l_.~~~8BtiBgeBt ea die appæ-.'II efa øœc8 efteøteH-.'e 8eBSidemâeæ --"Uer apeemeBtB IBd BiedæeeH8BB (iee Figure 2; Su¡'area PøSlFt!I llap). Im¡lIemeBæHaB af :\It:eI'B8W¡e 'F-,¡a wiHøeeeHitet:e alftlemeBt:s ¡,ew;eeø the Chy ef Cliula Vtilta, Pl'eJlefty aWBeI'8 aM the Wildlife ageøeies, all weH all æedifieeâaBS te the Cify's CeBefal PIIIB aM Jlrejeet 1Ie'¡elEll'æeBt Jl1øøs. Specific differeoces between ______J. IJIiii\i_Su¡'8H8 RIB .\llefBMivl 9ft! __.I. .. ,~xX;«'.. . . *' ¡ox. " ';«"'~" . ....""""0"''''''..','" 'J:?e are descnbed m more detail m Section 4.0. It IS the intent of the City of Chula Vista to adopt one preserve .. in this Subarea Plan which will be the subject of the IA (described in Section 1.0 above); therefore, revisions to this plan are anticipated before final adoption. 4.0 DFSCIUPTlON OF THE CIIuLA VISTA SUBAREA PLAN The City's Subarea Plan coverage, shown in Figure I, consists of the entire Chula Vista General Plan area, with the exception of areas where the City of National City and San Diego have jurisdictional authority. The City's Subarea Plan is divided into three components consisting of: 1) the "City Component" (reflecting the current Chula Vista jurisdictional area), 2) the "Bonita Component," and 3) the "Otay Ranch Component. " The Bonita and Otay Ranch Components consist entirely of unincorporated properties, and are anticipated to be annexed into the City of Chula Vista, either in part or entirely in the future. Those preserve areas that are currently located within unincorporated areas are either covered or will be covered by the County of San Diego's Subarea Plan. For purposes of continuity and preserve integrity, both the preserve lands in the unincorporated portion of the City's Subarea Plan and the overlapping County Subarea Plan are depicted similarly. All unincorporated lands depicted as part of the City's Subarea Plan shall only be considered covered by the Subarea Plan "take authorization" upon annexation to the City of Chula Vista, Where a portion of, but not all of a proposed development project is ¡¡~r~~¥_¡¡li.;_!t'!l"!f~'!ai9!\~~!"'!!!! PlIB.. lB.}' suhseq,u!øt CeBBeFliatieø :~«NemeBt --.I t:I1e If... The Subarea Plan preserve includes approximately 1,937 acres within the City Component, approximately 2,176 acres within the Bonita Component, and approximately 13,094 acres within the Otay Ranch Component (See Figure 2; Subarea ~se_ Map); however, additional acreage may be annexed into the preserve with concurrence of property owners. The City's Subarea Plan contains both public 1ands/projects and private lands/projects, which are further described herein. The Subarea Plan includes portions of core biological resource areas and associated habitat linkages within the MSCP subregion which have been identified in the MSCP. These core areas consist of the Sweetwater River/Sweetwater Reservoir/San Miguel Mountain area and the Otay Lakes/Otay MesalOtay River Valley area, The linkages consist of the Sweetwater River to San Diego Bay, San Miguel. Mountain to Rancho Del Rey area and the Otay River Valley west of Interstate 80S. At. stated in the .' MSCP, these areas encompass one of the larger uninterrupted sensitive habitat areas in the San Diego region with both high AnimAl and plant diversity and large AnimAl and plant populations. A portion of 3 ,../S: - ~._- City of Chula V"tStø MSCP Subarea ",..,.,., Plan these areas are also inclucied in the ~'ì._. 18 ssed Ota /Sweetwater National Wildlife ..,.»"."".,.""."1",. ,."",.. .... ,.""J! I' Y Refuge, a 45,OOO-acre expanse of wildlife habitat stretching from the Mexican border to Interstate 8. Habitat linkages ftom these areas would provide connections west to the Pacific Ocean and the San Diego Bay. The majority of the private lands/projects within the City's Subarea Plan have been either surveyed as part of earlier project entitlement processes or were derived froøi additional biological resource invei:1tories prepared for the MSCP. The field totals for a project should be regarded as more accurate. The database numbers, however, may be utilized for analytical purposes. Tables 1 and 2 show the existing amount of habitat in the City's Subarea Plan and the amount of that habitat that will be preserved once the Subarea Plan is implemented, depending on which Alternative is selected. . 4 _ /6.- -- -. ~I -II ~1J ~~ 6~ ìI ~8 = Z III J z :52 I'l en~ . ¡Ij >8 f ~z ::I~ iSA. õ:3 . ar= ~~ u::l en A. U en ~ ï N <~ ! /1 0 , -' · - City ofChu/a Vrsta MSCP Subarrø JlNsJA'f Plan The development process in the City of Chula Vista consists of a tiered level of approvals until the granting of entitlements. To implement policies of the General Plan a master plAnnPd development must fust obtain approval of a General Development Plan ("GDP") or Specific Plan ("SP"). The GDP aDd SP act as a refmement of the General Plan policies, aDd a bridge between the Genera1 Plan aDd the next level of project approvals, the Sectional plAnnillg Area ("SPA") PIan(s). SPA Plans consist of the establishment of zoning regulations for the project, including land use arrangement aDd development guidelines. Entitlements are next obtained through the approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map. This is followed by the recordation of a Final Subdivision Map aDd the issuance of grading aDd infrastructure improvement plans in advance of actual building permits. Field surveys have been incorporated into the MSCP Geographical Information System database. Some differences may occur between field totals aDd the database. lil.~_~;ßUB~1RE4t PLtÞ{ ALTER/MTß'E OtfE :ntt}'olhnw1tg ¡, a Mei¡Jti8lt 8/ an al1e19lSlive J1TeSeFre J1ltm 1..hith ,eJ1,eaenla lite a,,··, eflFfMt GtlVM .b1ø SNl.J1'ifAN Š~WØJHM1fI ,r6jeela, P,ojeetJ 1rltielt Its-."t )eelf l'eY'islI5l}" .J1rt!J~ aM M\'t 8",ainetl1fetelHP'j åS\WB¡HfIe1fl /1S"1ftit5, ilteålåiRg "tM,€ awJts1'ÍSli8fU, " 1\111 Be gi-Itlt e8¥e6g£ sf the 87 l 1eeiel -.3..3pssalll}" lite mc!' aNi fIt;s EIIiHIr'ea .F!JaIt. 4.1 Citv Comoonent The City Component of the Subarea Plan covers all of the area contJIinM within the City's current jurisdictional boundaries and represents the area which will receive "take authorization" with the signing -- open space p -"""""".""',"",.,."",,,,, mpo p pe g on San Diego Bay, portions of the Sweetwater and Otay Rivers, aDd many finger canyons between Interstate 80S to Upper and Lower Otay Reservoir. Most of this area bas been built out or planned for development and f"I"Aining open space areas are currently reflected on the City's General Plan Land Use Diagram. . 4.1.1 Private Projects In the City Component 4.1.1.1 Bonita Long Canyon Bonita Long Canyon lies north of East H Street, aDd south of Bonita Road, The project is bordered by Country Trails Lane on the North, Otay Lakes Road on the west, East H Street on the south aDd 6 -/1- City ofChula Vista MSCP Subartll Jllwffll" Plan Corral Canyon Road on the east. The 650 acre subdivision encompasses areas with irregular terrain and steep-sided canyons with considerable native vegetation. The subdivision includes 768 single family dwellings and a 56 unit apartment complex, an elementary school, an equestrian center and a park site. All discreûonary approvals have been obtained for development and the project is considered to be built out. A small acreage of Cleveland Sage is preserved. Approximately 281 acres of open space are preserved as dedicated open space. See Appendix for significant on-site vegetation acreage to be preserved. 4.1.1.5.1 Imnlementation Measures Mitigation measures, identified in EIR-79-02 and the resolution approving the tentative subdivision map for the project (Resolution No. 11993), require the permanent preservation and maintenance of the habitat by the project residents through an open space maintenance district: Also required are the preservation of a 5-acre stand of Cleveland sage scrub, restrictions on bJ\l~hil1g and clearing and revegetation of manufactured slopes with native plant species. 4.1.1.2 Salt Creek 1 The project site contains 124 acres of rolling temin located mostly on the south side of Proctor Valley Road which also traverses the property's northeast corner. The parcel is bisected by recently- constructed East H Street which presently terminates at the project's easterly boundary. The project consists of 169 detached single family dwellings, 237 toWDhomes and 144 condominiums, the construction of which has already occurred or is in process. The post-development condition of the project's remaini~g natural open space consists of a limited amount of natural coastal sage scrub and revegetated coastal sage scrub located at the northwest corner of the site. In addition, one acre of Otay tarplant, located in the north-c:entra1 area of the site, has been preserved. See Appendix for significant on-site vegetation acreage to be preserved. 4.1.1.2.1 Imnlementation Measures Mitigation measures, identified in EIR 89-06, adopted with the approval of the tentative map for Salt Creek I (Resolution No. 15299), include the preservation of a limited acreage of natural coastal sage scrub and revegetated acres of that habitat and one acre of Otay tarp1ant fenced for its protection. Mitigation measures have been completed. The vegetation communities will be preserved and maintained by project residents through an open space maintenance district as required by the aforementioned resolution. 4.1.1.3 Rancho Del Rey The Rancho Del Rey project consists of three SPA Plan areas (SPA I, n kIn). The entiœ project area ." contains 1,585 acres located north and south of East H Street between Interstate 805·and Otay Lakes Road and north of Telegraph Canyon Road. Site characteristics consist primarily of east-west trending 7 - If- "--.- -."--...- -------~.- City of Chula Vrsfo MSCP Subarta ~'I'l" Plan ridges, with side slopes of 15 to 30 percent gradient and intervening canyons. The primary topographic features of the property are the three legs of Rice Canyon. The northern leg is the primary drainageway of the project and contains sensitive biological resources. Developed areas are located on the higher elevations or plateaus while the canyons and slopes remain largely in open space. The combined project area consists of a mixed-use development regulated by a specific plan and 3 SPA Plans authorizing the constJuction of approximately 4,067 dwelling units, a commercial/industrial center, schools, parks and approximately 549 acres of open space. The project bas been graded and approximately 50% constructed. The property contains a variety of plant species, included in coastal sage scrub habitat, and is inhabited by several sensitive plants and animals. These include: coast barrel cactus, Snake choUa, San Diego ragweed, California gnatcatcher and Cactus wren. Habitats for these species exist in the retained canyons and hillsides within the project. See Appendix for significant on-site vegetation acreage to be preserved. 4.1.1.3.1 Imnlementation Measures Mitigation measures, identified in EIR-83-02, SEIR-87-01, SEIR-89-02 and SEIR-89-10, were adopted concurrently with the approval of three Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plans and several subsequent tentative subdivision maps. These measures included the preservation of coastal sage scrub acreage, chaparral acreage and riparian woodland acreage. In addition, a required revegetation plan included replanting of manufactured slopes adjacent to natural areas with native vegetation, re-establisbment of canyon bottom biota and the creation of a cacti refuge for snake cholla, fISh hook, and barrel cactus. The habitat will be preserved and maintained by project residents through an open space maintenance district, as identified in the EIR and its supplements, and required by the ~solutions of approval for the aforementioned tentative maps. Mitigation is currently underway. In accordance with Draft Findings for a 4(d) Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) Loss Permit for Rancho Del Rey SPA m (Case No.:CS95-01), a Habitat Management Plan (lIMP) for offsite mitigation within O'Neal Canyon, dated October 14, 1994, shall be implemented. A total of 360 acres have been purchased in O'Neal Canyon, located in the County of San Diego, and funding provided to assure open space maintenance for this property in perpetuity. 4.1.1.4 Terra Nova The Tem Nova project contains 419 acres located north and south of East H Street at its intersection with Interstate 80S. The development plan provides for 334 single family dwellings, 638 condominiums, 224 multi-family units and approximately 188,000 square feet of retail commercial and office space, an elementary school, a neighborhood park and 125 acres of open space. The project bas been fully developed. See Appendix for significant on-site vegetation acreage to be preserved, " 8 -dv- - ~ . City ofChUlQ Vista "Mscp Subol'6o ""'...... Plan 4.1.1.4.1 Jmnlementation Measures Miûgaûon measures, idenûfied in EIR-79-08 and the resoluûon approving the tentaûve map for the project (Resoluûon No, 10416) include the preservaûon of natural open space which contains coastal sage scrub and riparian vegetation and one vernal pool. The vernal pool bas been fenced for its protection and transplantaûon of some of the sensitive plant species bas occurred. The open space is being maintained by the project residents via an City-operated open space maintenance district. 4.1.1.5 Salt Creek Rancl1 The project site contains approximately 1,197 acres of vacant land located north and south of Proctor Valley Road, west of Upper Otay Reservoir and south of San Miguel Mountain, The property consists of rolling to steep terrain focused around Salt Creek, an intermittently flowing drainage course. The project has been approved by the City for subdivision into approximately 2,100 single family dwellings and 509 mulûple family dwellings, two elementary school sites, two park sites, a fire staûon site and approximately 452 acres of open space, "the majority of which will be retained in their natural state. Tentaûve Subdivision Map approvals have been obtained; however, final subdivision maps have not received approval. Within the natural open space, are coastal sage sclUb habitat and wetlands, both considered sensitive habitats. The open space consists of relaûvely narrow canyons averaging 600 feet in width, narrowing to approximately 200 feet. These canyons provide viable wildlife corridors that support extensive habitat. See Appendix for significant on-site vegetation acreage to be preserved. 4.1.1.5.1 Jmnlementaûon Measures Mitigation measures, idenûfied in Supplemental EnviroDmentallmpact Report 91-03, adopted with the approval of the tentative map for the Salt Creek Ranch (Resoluûon No. 16834), include the creaûon and enhancement of on-site wetland habitat, wetland protecûon from grading sedimentaûon and erosion, retention of coastal sage sclUb habitat and the planting of naûve scrub vegetation on manufactured slopes. The miûgaûon measures have not been implemented yet as the project bas not been completed. The project design creates addiûonal contiguous open space, and the approval resoluûon provides for the long-term conservaûon of naûve habitat by requiring the dedicaûon of these areas as natural open space easements. Protecûon of these easements would consist of fencing and/or the planting of naûve barrier plant species around open space, as well as maintenaDce through an open space maintenance district, with the residents of the project contributing funds for these efforts. 4.1.1.6 Mid-Bayfront . The Chula Vista Bayfront Specific Plan Area is located west of lutì::uibate S, south of Highway 54 and the northern boundary of the City of Chula Vista and north of L Street. The area encompasses 9 - d-¡ _ ___n____ _ ___._ - ---.- . City of Chula Vista MSCP Suborta 11M",., Plan approximately 1,013 acres which are original uplands or filled areas above mean high tide and wetlands. The area includes the 316 acre Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. The refuge is the )¡¡rgest remAining natural wetland area on San Diego Bay. Adopted land uses include residential, commercial, industrial, public and quasi-public, open space and a ceDtral resort district. Implementation plans for the Bayfront Specific Plan will required the developer to dedicate open space areas. It is the City's intent to require that an open space maintenance assessment district be formed for the open space within the Bayfront Specific Plan area. See Appendix for significant on-site vegetation acreage to be preserved. 4.1.1.6.1 Imnlementation Measures Mitigation measures identified in EIR-85-1, EIR-86-1 and EIR 89-8 and adopted with the approval of the Chula Vista Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan and Implementation Plan for the Bayfront Specific Plan, via Ordinance Number 2532, are identified below. Mitigation measures identified in the EIR's which have not yet been implemented include development of habitat restoration and management plans,' predator management plans, mudflat and wetland monitoring plans, as well as establishment of 100 foot buffer zones, vegetation screening of the "F" & "0" Street marsh employing coastal sage scrob and maritime succulents, protection of mudflats and eel grass by energy dissipators and traps for oil, grease and particulates in storm drain outfalls, and upland conversion to provide 3.5 acres of freshwater marsh. Mitigation acreages for restoration of wetlands which have not yet been implemented total 27.8 consisting of 5.5 acres of freshwater marsh and 22.3 acres of salt marsh. 2.2 acres of coastal sage scrob perimeter screening and berm are also included. Habitat enhancement acreage which have not yet been implemented include: 0.5 acres of salt marsh wetland and .5 acre of coastal sage. Mitigation measures also include: a desilting basin, improved tidal flushing, 8.5 acres of new coastal sage scrob/succulent scrob habitat in a primary buffer zone, a bridge stnlcture to provide an underpass for fauna, visual screening, and access control. Long-term management and maintenance processes include: ownership and management of the 316 acre Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge by the USFWS and predator management funded by Rohr Industries. The funding of the Nature Interpretive Center is through the City's General Fund and the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency. 4.1.1.7 8unbow n The project site contains approximately 604 acres of vacant land located on the south side of Telegraph Canyon Road at Medical Center Drive about one half mile east of Interstate 805. The property is characterized by gently to steeply sloping hillsides with drainage ocaJ11'ÌD& primarily through two east- west trending canyons, the most prominent being Poggi Canyon through which the planned extension of Orange Avenue would traverse. 10 ~;):;.- -------- City of Chula VISta MSCP SulHtrra /WøA., Plan The proposed project is a mixed use development consisting of 1,128 single family dwellings, 818 multiple family dwellings, 10 acres of commercial uses, 52 acres of research industrial, a 10 acre community recreation center, a 10 acre elementary school site and 177 acres of open space, While a Tentative Subdivision Map has been approved a Final Subdivision Map(s) has not been recorded and therefore no development has 0CCUITed. The primary vegetation within the open space to be retained is coastal sage SClUb and introduced Dative species planted on manufactured slopes. See Appendix for signiÏu:ant on-site vegetation acreage to be preserved. 4.1.1.7.1 Imnlementation Measures Mitigation measures, identified in EIR 88-01 and adopted concurrently with the approval of the tentative map for Sun bow n (Resolution No. 15640), include the preservation of coastal sage scrub located throughout the project. The habitat will be preserved and mAintainl'rl by project residents through an open space maintenance district as required by .the aforementioned resolution. USFWS granted a Section 7 Permit - Biological Opinion (#1-6-95-F-17) on January 6, 1995 for the Sunbow n project. 4.1.1.8 Eastlake The 3,151 acre project site is located approximately 7.5 miles east of downtown Chula Vista and 8 miles north of the United StateslMexico border. Bisected by Otay Lakes Road, the property extends west of the Upper and Lower Otay Lakes and directly south of Proctor Valley Road. The topography consists of rolling hills cut by drainage courses. Various drainages extend into the project site boundary, including Poggi Canyon in the south, Telegraph Canyon in the center, Long Canyon in the west and Proctor Valley in the north and Salt Creek to the south, Upper and Lower Otay Lakes are located along the easterly edge of the project boundary. The planned community is a mixture of residential, employment park, office, commercial, recreational and open space land uses. The project is regulated by three General Development Plans (GDPs) and 6 Sectional plAnning Area plans (SPAs) authorizing the construction of 8,427 dwelling units, 42% of which have been constructed. Discretionary approvals that remain include design review for portioDS of EastLake I and n. A General Development Plan has been approved for EastLake m; however, the developer is pursuing a revision of the GDP, and adoption of SPAs, Tentative Subdivision Maps and Design Review approvals. Habitats that have been or will be retained by the Homeowners Association in open space include: coastal sage scrub, ponds and vernal pools. Open space maintenance assessment distticts will be used to assure the long-term maintenance of preserve open space areas. See Appendix for significant on-site . vegetation acreage to be preserved. 11 - ;)..B~ -.-..- ---- .-.-- ~._-,..- - . City of Chu/o VISta MSCP Subarea 1INHvI.. Plan 4.1.1.8.1 Imnlementation Measures Mitigation measures, identified in EIR-81-3 and adopted with Resolution No. 1193S consist of the incorporation of coastal sage scrub into the project design as open space. The open space is maintllined through an open space maint"1WICe district with residents of the project contributing funds for these efforts. 4.1.1.9 Other Private Properties Other privately-owned parcels of land located within the Subarea Plan preserve and within the City Component consist of approximately 482 acres, and are located within the Otay River Valley. Where agreements with the property owners have not been reached, these properties have been designated as =~g a Minor Amendment (See Section IlLl-t1B11'ì_IlBlIIDIU) to the Subarea 4.1.2 Public/Quasi-Public Projects in the City Component 4.1.2.1 Sweetwater Valley Regional Park The Sweetwater Valley Regional Park consists of SIS acres containing most of the Sweetwater River flood plain and extends from Interstate 80S, on the west, to the Sweetwater Reservoir on the east. The City of Chula Vista portion of the Sweetwater Valley Regional Park, totalling approximately 178 acres, extends from Central A venue on the east to Willow S~t on the west, and is flanked on the north by residential and Sweetwater Road, and on the south by residential, commercial and Bonita Road. This area of the regional park consists primarily of open space uses, such as Robr Park, Sweetwater Park and the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course. This portion of the regional park serves as an open space connection from properties originating at the Sweetwater Reservoir and extending eventually to San Diego Bay (See Section 3.2.2.4 for additional discussion of the Sweetwater Valley Regional Park), Within the City's portion of the regional park, recreational activities such as picnicking, ballfields, golf, biking, and horseback riding occur in designated areas. The Sweetwater River meanders its way through the City of Chula Vista on its way to the bay and serves as a signiflCaJlt biological linkage. 4.1.2.2 Port District Jurisdiction The Port District of San Diego bas jurisdiction over property below the mean high tide line within the City's Bayfront area, but within the City's jurisdictional boundary. The Port District will be responsible for preserve plannil1g and maintenance within its jurisdiction, and have begun initial preparation of a resource enhancement plan for the South San Diego Bay. 4.1.2.3 Otay Valley RegIonal Park .' The Otay Valley Regional Park (OVRP) is a planned regional park system consisting of approximately 1,100 acres, extending from the San Diego Bay to and including the Otay Reservoirs. Approximately 12 -;1<1- City of Chula Vista MSCP Subørta PMIA" Plan 500 acres of the proposed regional park are planned within the City Component of the Subarea Plan. The J'f'11IAinittg portions of the proposed regional park are located within the City of San Diego and the County of San Diego. All natural open space areas identified as part of the OVRP Concept Plan and within the City's jurisdiction (City Component). 11ft! also identified as either preserve IIft!A or areas subject to a Minor Amendment (See Section 6.5). The natural open space areas identified in the Draft OVRP Concept Plan are consistent with the preserve goals of the MSCP and this Subarea Plan. A detailed description of the Draft OVRP Concept Plan is provided in the Otay Ranch Component (See Section 4.3.2.3 herein). 4.2 Bonita CoJQoonent The Bonita Component consists of both existing and planned private and public projectsllands currently located within the unincorporated area of the County, within the Bonita and Sunnyside areas. 4.2.1 PrIvate Projects in the Bonita Component 4.2.1.1 San Miguel Ranch The project site contains approximately 2,590 acres of presently undeveloped land located south and east of the Sweetwater Reservoir and adjacent to the northeastern border of the City of Chula Vista. The San Miguel Ranch project site is within the City's adopted sphere of influence. The property, which is predominantly composed of sloping hillsides, valleys and Mother Miguel Mountain, consists of an 1,852-acre northern parcel and a 738-acre southern parcel. The north and south parcels are separated by property owned by SDG&E, which contains the Miguel Substation and associated tJ1InmniRsion lines. . The project site is bounded generally by Proctor Valley Road on the west and south, the Otay water treatment facility and San Miguel Mountain on the east, and the Sweetwater River and Sweetwater Reservoir on the north and northwest. The northern portion of the project site is located within the Sweetwater Reservoir/San Miguel Mountain/Sweetwater River core area of the MSCP. 13 - ~j-- City ofClrula V"1StD MSCP Subomll'lowfPI'f Plan _"j1~~D.. ~ " ." ,.~, ." '~'" ' .{ , ' . :., ,'.' : .,:= /: .:;:.: .' . .".. .;-; .:.' ,:,' "... ;-' '" ,. _. ';:::::::;;jl ~ .;.;,..'? :;:>=. '::::·.·:t),·,::\·;~~:· : " '" '::. :~" ' '. '" ::: ,':: . . . w,....,,·,· _,', . ....,.. . .,..... ". .'" ^ ;.;« .~ 14 - ~6_ .......-_.. .- City ofChula VISta MSCP Subartll Aw,,,,, Plan .1Ir..~*IÎ.IÌI'lt1_"'·-~ :~.....',.,., X::-:¡'::X~...~"$>-"~'"::;:'~' ~¡.:,\;";}':=:':::"'x~"'-:,.....~' «.'''x~ _, >",¿ ,. , .. ,.;. ...., .;<, "\ 1'''., "".,,,,.,,,.,:~,. ,.",11,.;.,111 *JIII! ·.,.-:>å···,·'·, , x"....",......,_, .¡.; , ,'::: , :;: .... .., > - ;:::-;-,,:«...."«: :::~~;:::~::~;~~~~;:~: ;:. ~) . ~......,.,M""""'" .}. . .' ,-.'. '. '.}. . " . . , . .~.,... ... . ... , 15 -¿)./}- -+--" -~- -----~.~- ---- City of Chulo Vtsfo MSCP Suborro n-~.. PIon 11Iíì__I____ [úlll141l1r__BJIIfJlfRlliIl .""~1i~ ..,..;.:::::; ::::':." v:.;: " ,~~';"'«-X*" ... .'. .;.m ".;":' . .;.;.;.;;.,.:',:, .;y;.;.;*:~' . !~~JIIDIIŒ ,.. ,":...;:::::::::"ø.::;-~.:::... ·'·''''::::::.'::::::£:;:·:::::::.-:::·w·, . :<....,,»., . ., < .~y~ }:.,:-Š~. :~ : '*y:::-~·:·~~·,';;,·:·~~~::.v·?:' '.': ...;:::.,. '" .,.,,' ..'~ ,;:,'. '.... '.:,<:::.::::::.: ' .~" ',' "";m~ ,", '::~ if$¡W_~1.~IIIIKI"'" .·i_~ $i;m''';;w:;ii':i::''~'''''' .... ,..,...,...,;.,...,.."'.,..,:. .' , . '·w v;. .' .. .. ¡.;' .. ,v;,,;.:.:,.:-;.¡.;.; .. ..îi'ìJJI_~I_"A'~~1 . . 11Ie CiI;y's adepøea ef IR efl(l;----e (Ne. :J§iI!) aIIa"'iIIg llie ppapeRy te I,. prei!iaøed 811 a pl&BBell eelBRlllBÌfy, ~ llie HepHea eftlle PIIBBed CelBlB1JfIfty ("PC") 18M, _lIie CiI;y'slppre·18I. ef a resehHiea ENe. 1 'G~9) HepHBg a GÐP feHevlÍIIg tile eel'tÜÌe&âea ef a ,regrem eø';Ífa--eøtel ÌlBJaet I'8pel't ea M&reB 22, 1993. SUh.... appre'J&I ¡, eeBlliMiBg ef ¡P." PlIR, 'feøtaw..e Suhdi"lisiea Map Eo) IRII 1"--' Map(1!) will he I'8ltUired. The SIR Mipel RBBeB CÐP is ,riBeipally regBJ'dell 811 a --""ter pl----4 I'8silleaYel. rv--"-~r .,..1I.ieII. will ,revide al'llBge eflteøsiftg wflIs \~iftg let sÎ!es. 9r..ele,æeRt wtI8 te teJ¡e ,laee wHhiB tile 1,8U eere NeRllem Pareel --.. llie 718 881'8 Eeølliem PaNel. 'fIte eeadiHS"-~'!)' appre'.. ~ _llIdes 1111 te 1,619 d';;elliftg 1IBits (11]1 te J§7 nIIIille-":·' estate leà ÎB tile It8rtk 8 lip te 1,:!62l'8SideøHelleà ÎB tile sBlHh). a er-....reilll. ..øter, HI el8IR8B!8I'y selieel, a puhlie ,1II'k .-.. e,eB lIIIaee. I. IIM\' ,rep8fty . e'l.'ftef lias filed fer IR l11J18BŠed C9P WhiM 1\'B!IId eeaeeBlftte all develepæ_ aft tile ¡e1itltefB Pereel rA:' 1'80el"\'e llie Neft1l.efB Pareel 811 "-"';¡¡'¡'ed epeB lIIIaee. 16 -~J- . City ofChula VISta MSCP Subarea PlwIF1" Plan 1.2.1.1.1 ImeteæelH&tieø hfeaSUfe9 'Fhe CRy appre\'I!d tile SDfl Mig1:Iel Reek CDP, øulljeet 18 8eBdæellØ, wlHeIt æ1l9t he eeæplied ~'idi ,PÌer te appre\'aI ef tile fifst SP/. PIIB fer tile prejeet (Eee CRy af Ckula 'Møta CRy C'ò11BSil ReseløâeB Ne. 17919 far 8eBllifieB!l). j';. BUIBtIer ef disereHelllll'Y _allØ iBelødiBg: a SPA pllB, dNeh-,æ IIBtI lIBB8!IIIfÌellØ, teøtaâ";e IIUIIdi,-ÌIIieB IBIIps, IIBtI tllllr aéefÎi!aâ8BS te ,eRBit tile tIIle ef 11I1 Ce'-8I'IId SjJeeies, iBelødiBg die&e speeies Bat pre&elHly liøted 811 EBtIø:øgered, 'RIreeteBed 5r Cllødidate Speeies _er die ESI. ef tile Cl;SI.. MifiglHÌ5B me8ll1lf89, illeBtiHed ÍB EIR 99 ~ IIBtI H8I'ted with tile al'l're':aI ef die CBP (Res5l1itieB Ne. 1791~ ere idelHiHed ÍB die atteelted EIR, 4.2.1.2 Other Private Properties Other privately-owned parcels of land located within the SlIhllfea Pløø presel'...e IIBtIleeated ·.villliB the Bonita Component are designated as "Minor Amendment Areas" (See Secûon 9.1 BWlti66t ~Ililllìl!), and consist of approximately 926 acres. «~·~~·:«~x,v;..·~x·:·;·~«·, 4.2.2 PubUc/Quasi-Public LandslProJects In the Bonita Component 4.2.2.1 San Diego Gas & Electric San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) owns approximately 301 acres of property located on the westerly slopes of Mother Miguel Mountain. Equivalent NCCP-Ievel preserve planning for this property will be the responsibility of that agency (as requested by SDG&E). 4.2.2.2 Otay Water District Otay Water District (OWD) owns approximately 509 acres of property located directly nonh of the Salt Creek Ranch project. Equivalent NCCP-level preserve planning for this property will be the responsibility of that agency (as requested by OWD). 4.2.2.3 Sweetwater Authority Sweetwater Authority (SA) water district owns approximately 355 acres located along the southern banks of the Sweetwater Reservoir. Equivalent NCCP-Ievel preserve planning for this property will be the responsibility of the agency (as requested by SA). 4.2.2.4 Sw..á..ater Regional Park Sweetwater Regional Park is located in the Sweetwater River Valley between the Sweetwater Reservoir on the east and I-80S on the east in the Bonita/Sunnyside area. The eastern third occupies the high, billy ground between the reservoir and the valley below. The western two-thirds lies within the HIO- year floodplain of the Sweetwater River. . Approximately 178 acres are located within Chula Vista's 17 -..;2P. .----."..-....---. -~. -- - - City ofChu/o VISta MSCP SubDreo PIa",.. Plan boundaries (See lI!IiIj!I~I~lCHy (JelBl'eøeat, hePeiB). The UIIÎDI:Orporated part of the park includes about 515 acres, and is under the jurisdiction of the County. Sensitive plants present within the County portion of the park include Hemi7.onia coniullens. Ferocactus viridesccns. Iva havesiana. Adolphia californica. Viquiera lacinata. Dudleva variellata and Sela¡inella cinerasccns. Existing Park uses include several houses, an equestrian Center, limited retail commercial, a golf driving range, a pine tree nursery, abandoned dairy buildings, trails and a campground. Maintenance of the unincorporated portion of the Sweetwater Regional Park will continue to be addressed by the County of San Diego. 4.1.1.5 Resolution Trust CorporationlRancho San Diego MItigation Bank The County of San Diego and other agencies have recently acquired approximately 160 acres of land, previously owned by the Resolution Trust Corporation as a mitigation parcel (referred to as the Sweetwater IT property) for the development of the Rancho San Diego Specific Plan. Initially, the site may serve as a mitigation area for a number of non-Chula Vista public projects which impact coastal sage scrub and riparian woodland habitats. These lands .will tie managed by the USFWS as part of .;¡I.li.,¡§!I!~I:!I!lflîI"..§i. lIIItiell8l wildlife fefuge. 4.3 Otav RAnch Comoonent The Otay Ranch Component consists of both existing and planned private and public projects/lands currently located within the unincorporated area of the County; however, within the City's General Plan area. This eeæl'SBeBt eSBtaÏØ5 t\VS altefB8â-Je I'feseFl/e desips. 4.3.1 PrIvate Projects In the Otay Ranch Component 4.3.1.1 Otay Ranch 4.3.1.1.1 Annroved GDP/SRP The Otay Ranch General .:·.:::~:::y::::~~2:::<*y¿ :w<m~;~;"~~;~~~<; ,; : ~ œ}I_.PI&& AmeødæeBt, proposed by Baldwin Vista Associates (oov/Õt8ý Rancbl.]>:), was approved-by the County Board of Supervisors on October 28, 1993. The project proposes 24,000 dwelling units on 23,000 acres and includes approximately 12,000 acres of open space, a commercial village and a potential university site, with a potential final population of 68,000-70,000 persons, The approved project included a series of IS villages, ranging from 4.5 to 18 dwelling units per acre within the core areas. These villages and other ruraI«nsity areas would allow as many as 13,144 single-family units and 11,080 multi-family units. See ~al!le9 1 It 2 for project vegetation summaries based on geographic information system analysis, - . 18 -3ð~ ·--- -- - - --- - . -. -- -_.._-_.. --- .. - Cily of Chula VIStø MSCP SuboR/l ~. Plan While most of the Otay Ranch is within the unincorporated area, the City of Chula Vista has applied for a Sphere of Influence designation preparatory to annexing significant portions of the proposed development to the city. The Otay Ranch comprises the largest privately held ownership of Coast8I sage scrub ~ vegetation in the United States. The combination of CSS and other habitats, varying geography, ànd location at the boundaries of several plant floras (unique combinations of plants) make the Ranch a unique biological resource. The Otay Ranch ownership is divided into three major parcels: 1) Otay Valley Parcel (9,449 acres); 2) Proctor Valley Parcel (7,895 acres) and 3) San Ysidro Parcel (5,555 acres). The dominant feature linking the three Otay Ranch parcels is the Otay River system, which includes a tributary system of canyons and drainage courses and the Otay Lakes. The size and undeveloped character of the property, its diverse terrain, its strategic location at the northern margin of Baja California habitat associations, and its links to large areas .of public ownership contribute to the presence of an important and unusual assemblage of habitats and species. The following is a Jllmmary of plant communities, wildlife habitats, and sensitive species that exist on the Otay Ranch property based upon various inventories of existing resources on the site. Otav Vallev Parcel: The Otay Valley Parcel is the largest parcel of Otay Ranch, comprising 9,449 acres. This area of land is bounded by Telegraph Canyon Road on the north, Heritage Road and the Otay Landf1l1 site on the west, Brown Field on the south, and Lower Otay Lake on the east. The Otay River Valley bisects the southern portion of this parcel east to west. Several natura11andforms arc situated within this parcel: Wolf Canyon, Salt Creek Canyon, Poggi Canyon, Johnson Canyon, O'Neal Canyon, and Rock Mountain. The six "out parcels" (property not owned by Baldwin Vista) within the boundaries of the Otay Valley Parcel conespond to lands dedicated to reservoirs (or other facilities) in the Otay Water District and City of San Diego water system, a Federal Aviation Adm;nilltration airway control facility, a rock miniTlg quarry, and privately owned parcels. The Otay Valley Parcel contains approximately 1,825 acres of Coastal sage scrub. Maritime succulent scrub habitat is concentrated in three genera1locations on the Otay Valley Parcel: in the western and eastern corners and in the central southern area, covering 285 acres in all. Other vegetation found on the Otay Valley Parcel includes 7 acres of Cham;!Il! chapaml, 1,310 acres of non-native grassland, and 12 acres of Southern willow scrub. Baccharis scrub, Baccharis floodplain scrub, and Tamarisk scrub arc also present. The Otay Valley Parcel contains an area of Vernal pool habitat and associated mima mound topography. These arc generally located south of the River. Recent sightings (19~9 and later) of sensitive animals made on the Otay Valley Parcel include the American badger, Common barn owl, . California I""tcatcher, Yellow-breasted chat, Cactus wren, Blue grosbeak, and Sage sparrow. Proctor Vallev/Jamul Mountains Parcel: The Proctor Valley Parcel comprises 7,895 acres, The Proctor Valley area is the northernmost portion of the Otay Ranch and is geœra11y bounded by Otay . Lakes Road and Lower Otay Lake to the south, the Upper Otay Lake and San Miguel Monntain~ to the west, the community of Jamul to the north, and vacant agricu1tura11and to the east. The Proctor Valley Parcel also includes the Mary Birch-Patrick Estate and the "1IIII1U,skle Ðe']19 L" areas. The four 19 - 31- -..-- - _n__ ~ _', City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarta I1Mf 'f Plan out parcels encompassed by the Proctor Valley Parcel com:spond to two sections of land owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), a City of San Diego reservoir, and two private holdings. Major landforms include the Jamul and Cl\lIahan MOl1ntain~. It is notable that this parcel contains two separate BLM ownerships which are governed by the adopted South Coast BLM Plan and not by the Otay Ranch Plan. The Proctor Valley Parcel contains approximately 4,843 acres of Coastal sage scrub habitat. Additional significant resources within the Proctor Valley Parcel include 569 acres of Southern mixed chaparral, approximately 49 acres of Valley needlegrass gras~land, and 138 acres of AJkali meadow. Coast live oak woodland covers 176 acres in the Proctor Valley Parcel. Small area containil\g Southern willow scrub and Eucalypú1S can also be found. Vernal pools occur primarily on wel!thered alluvial soils of mesas and floodplain temces in Proctor Valley. Recent sightings (1989 and later) of sensitive IInimals made on the Proctor Valley Parcel include the California gnatcatcher, Loggerhead shrike, Sage sparrow, Blue grosbeak, Two-striped garter snake, Rufous-crowned sparrow, and the Coastal rosy boa. San Ysidro Mountains Parcel: The San Ysidro Mountains Parcel is comprised of 5,555 acres located in the southeastern portion of the project area, along the fringes of the northern foothills of the San Ysidro Mountains and Otay Mountain. The parcel is generally bounded by the eastern ann of Lower Otay Lake and vacant land along Otay Lakes Road to the north, the main body of Lower Otay Lake to the west, land owned by the BLM to the south, and vacant land just west of the community of Dulzura to the east. Major landforms contained within this region include Little and Big Cedar Canyons and Hubbard Springs. The San Ysidro Mountains Parcel contains important biological resources. Coastal sage scrob can be found on 3,698 acres of this parcel. Approximately 469 acres of uniform stands of Chamise occur on mesas and some gentle slopes in the Otay Lakes portion of the San Y sidra Mountains Parcel. In addition, approximately 474 acres of non-native grassland, 5 acres of Coast live oak woodland, 75 acres of Coast southern live oak riparian forest, 7 acres of Sycamore alluvial wondland, and 165 acres of Southern interior cypress forest occur on this parcel. A small number of Vernal pools occur on the level terraces south of the eastern ann of Lower Otay Reservoir. Most of these exist off site on City of San Diego land. Some of the larger contiguous masses of habitat within the San Ysidro M01lntain~ Parcel include numerous sensitive plants and IIn;mal~. Recent sightings (1989 and later) of sensitive IInimllls have been made on the San Ysidro MOl1ntain~ Parcel, including the California gnatcatcher, Blue grosbeak, and San Diego horned lizard. Resource Manal!ement Plan: Part of the approval of General Plan Amendment for Otay Ranch included approval of the Phase I Resource Management Plan (RMP). "This is a comprehensive planning document that addresses the preservation, I!!IIhalV'.ement, and management of sensitive natural and cultural resources on the 22,899 acre Otay Ranch property. The RMP is intended to be the fuDl:tional equivalent of the County of San Diego Resource Protection Ordinance ~) for Otay Ranch. (RMP, 1993)" . 20 - 3ø1_ u - - ----. ~ - - - --- City ofChula Vtsto MSCP Subarea ArwM., Plan wThe goal of the RMP is establishment of an open space system that will become a permanent Management Preserve dedicated to the protection and f!nhA~nt of the multiple resources present on Otay Ranch. The RMP is intended to be implemented as part of the overall integrated plAnnil1g approach for Otay Ranch. W (IBID). The RMP addrCsses and compares the application of RPO and the RMP to various resources, including but not limited to: wetlands, wetland buffer areas, floodways, floodplain fringe, steep slopes lands and sensitive habitat lands. A series of goals, objeètives, policies and standards in the RMP address the following resource protection issues (see page 61-118, RMP): 1) identification of sensitive resources; 2) preservation of sensitive resources; 3) !nhArx:ement and restoration of sensitive resources; 4) wildlife corridors; S) preserve management and maintenance; 6) permitted uses; 7) resource preserve - adjacent land uses; 8) resource preserve - interim land uses; and regulatory framework for future uses. Phase 1 of the RMP was adopted at the time the General Plan for the project was adopted; Phase 2 bas been completed and submitted with the first SPA plan or Specific Plan for Otay Ranch. It will contain the following items: 1) conduct resource studies and related research; 2) select a· Preserve OwnerlManager (pOM); 3) commence implementation of programs for conveyance of land to POM, resource protection, enhancement and restoration, funding and monitoring of implementation; 4) refme preserve boundary based on completed studies; S) develop conceptual infrastructure plans for facilities in the preserve; and 6) identify location of permitted uses within the preserve. Other actions are required during the buildout of Otay Ranch (see RMP, p. IS). A partnership between the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego bas been recommended as the POM. BiOl!eOlmlnhv/Conservation Issues: Volume I or the RMP (1994, p. 147) states: wThe approved Plan Preserve boundary, illustrated in Figure 24 of the RMP, bas been proposed that incorporates the key resource areas identified in Chapter 2 and fulfills the goal, objectives and policies' of the RMP. In addition to the conceptual Preserve illustrated in Figure 24, additional Limited Development Areas totalling 1,166 acres have been identified as part of the plAnni'1g process for the Otay Ranch GDP/Subregional Plan. These Limited Development Areas (Figures 2S and 26) are assumed to be preserved in open space, although not included in the Otay Ranch Preserve. The Limited Development Areas are considered to eventually become part of the Chula Vista Subarea Preserve Plan. The approved IIliilî§flllB Preserve c!escnDed in this chapter is 11,37S acres in size. Together with the 1,166 acres of Limited Development Areas, a total of 12,541 acres are anticipated to be preserved in open space on Otay Ranch. W Concerning the Limited Development Areas, Figure 2S of the RMP (p. 149) states that: "Development within these areas is restricted pending future tecbnical studies. The precise configuration of the Limited Development Areas may be revised based on future studies carried out at the SPA level that will further define the limits of the Rural Development Area (RDA). In no case shall the acreage to be retained in open space be less than 396 acres (for Proctor Valley area and 770 acres for San Ysidro)." . The plAnned preserve area or Management Preserve attempts to capture the highest value resource areas as preserved lands and concentrate development in disturbed habitat or agricultural areas. Generally, 21 _ 33_ ...--., -- - . - - City ofChu/a Vista MSCP Suborta PIa..... Plan development areas are concentrated around major road systems such as Telegraph Canyon Road, East OraIIge Avenue, Paseo Ranchero, Otay Valley Road, Proctor Valley Road and Otay Lakes Road, Areas plRnnl'ñ to be developed also extend to a1n:ady developed areas, such as a series of villages south of Telegraph Canyon Road and residential development to the Nonh in Chula Vista and plRn....n development in. north Proctor Valley south of the community of Jamul. Pioneering development is plRnnl'ñ on the north slopes of Otay Valley, the lower slopes of Proctor Valley, north and south of Otay Reservoir and along Otay Lakes Road, and on the upper east-facing slopes above Highway 94 in the eastern San Y sidra parcel. Policy 6.2 of the RMP (RMP 1) calls for the locating of·up to 400 acres· of active recreation acreage within the Otay Ranch Preserve area, with priority placed on siting within the Otay Valley. A total of 400 acres has been identified within the Otay Valley on three previously disturbed bench areas, These areas are shown on the Subarea Plan (See Figure 2), and are identified as follows: 1) 127 acres south of Otay River, adjacent to Heritage RoadIOtay Valley Road, 2) 69 acres south of Otay River, east and west of future SRI2S, and 3) 204 acres north of Otay River, extending approximately two miles west from the mouth of Salt Creek, Section 6.3.2.1 herein contai1'ls specifIC guidelines designed to encourage a biological connection between habitat areas within the river and habitat on the northerly slopes of the river valley. The Chula Vista City Council and County Board of Supervisors have directed that this subarea plan reflect the plans, data, policies and requirements contained in the RMP 1. The RMP 1, when implemented through the RMP 2, meets all the components of a Subarea Plan, as defmed by the MSCP, and is incorporated herein by reference. AU eendiâeøs aøë eJle9l'âeøs listeå iB tfte 9œy RaøeIt BI'I'f9'J8I lIeB1HBeBB, iBellllliBg tfte Re8911fge MaøagemlRt Plu (VekHBe I) are lterel!y iBeeFpel'llted tly ..fereøee, wid¡ "splat te eHIIBeRt l'e1f8Í:feB1eøtÐ, fe·r;egetttisB NflBÍfefB8IH9, aHe1l.,,¡I faeilHies 1'.idtiB tile Pres.;, area, eIe. University Site: The Otay Ranch GDP/SRP also includes provisions for a University to be placed in Villages 9 and 10 and in the vicinity of Salt Creek Canyon, ·provided that the use of Salt Creek Canyon (including defining slopes) is limited to trails, passive recreation, and biological resean:h and educational activities in keeping with the preservation of sensitive habitat and biological species located there. No buildings or structures shall be permitted within Salt Creek Canyon.· __1_ IJ!iI..1IIIBnlB PIe ldte_â"l Qne assumes that the potential University site may include development between Wueste Road to the east and the defining slopes of Salt Creek Canyon, consistent with the GDP/SRP policies. ~ All conditions and exceptions listed in the Otay Ranch approval documents, including the Resource Management Plan (Volume I) are hereby incorporated by reference, with respect to easement requirements, revegetation requirements, allowed facilities within the ~e Area,. etc. 22 ~ 3tf- City ofChulo Vista MSCP Subo..... _J.... PIon ~ .' ..., , ......,.. . . ~ .,'-- . ..", ,. . .--'..,.., ., ~ 11_BWt_ .a"_I_qi"'_'~:· :.:,:~." .. :,:,~:,:-:-:,:::=:,:¡-:.. .:':' ·,·........w"".,."'",,., 1.1iI~'IlIl._--!IiW " ;:;..;.;;¡.:~ mI~.~iJ.!! _1iB._....I.~IJ~_~dI- '. 23 - 3J....~ - - -.---- -.-.- -- --- -- ~-- - - -----.-.-- _.- City ofChu/a Vtsta MSCP Subarea Pm.-., Plan IIrißBrØMBBUB' _11.111___.> .1I,.r...-..~all I (~¡fl$~.¡D'I"(4i'N~~'«=~.. ..... W·.· ">-,:.:. ..^'.......=M.'W^"''''.iM....".... ....... ..¡.., . ..... .'. .' ·11,· «. ~'UIIiIW,f¡" .... m...~X0X-»:«";«<O; ~~~.*;,..,......., "':::;;;: :::.i> . :":;:;.::~.::x:/ '. :M,~.:..'.}·.·.::.l ::·',·:::~t;::::::~:;:~~::::;. 1IIIIIIil_~lllt"II_"'__1 Ilrjlllll'.1~1_T"'IJIP"~~IIIr.1 'jr~11ti[:.':~v~~~::: '..'r4111i_jÎ~:::::\"':~j:;:.__ W^,^, 24 - 3~_ , City of Chulo Vrstø MSCP Subørttl "'-"Ò PIon ,'~' ..;.;. ':;.w.~.' . ".I......JiI.'BI1!1&.1t¡1J x'''' :;;;:;::: ..... :::: .,:¡:::¡;¡:., ., ::;;- , " '.....,.....~ y'." ' ,... '";::;:::::::;;::...:::;:::=:; ".:«';.. ... . ".«Y:.' Xv, {X " ,'V:'}.':':",.". , . *-"., ,;'=::'::~.tlllI"""··~~~II- If . .:::;. .:" . ~ _1I1Bh'WÎÎJÎt,tij.wc.. ,. 25 - 31_ - - -- --- - - City ofChulo VistD MSCP Subøm JInH-.. Plan -- . 26 - 3~- - .'~"",-- City a/Chura Vrstø MSCP Subareo Aw.",..l'Ian ·:It....'~J·I~t Ii__ 11__8I'~~~~::,:~':=~::11._ ~ '~. . ......~t,:".,) .~.,~): :.,.....:....:...> ,.';'.' .... .)... 27 - 3?_ - . - - -. City ofChula V"tsta MSCP Subat'ta lWrM.. Plan ';:\;:!'~~::~:~:~~~P·"~~~i .~ _.^..~.. .... '.~' ,:.', " ··..··'·';:::·{u· . ;.: ." .,:'., t·, ,:{: -:**-. .,.,:..~ '. .'ow.' . ,..,:..."...,.... :~~, , .,I.a~L~~»ÍIIi....__1 4.3.1.2 Other Private Properties Other privately-owned parcels of land located within the Otay Ranch Component aDd potentially part of the preserve are reflected as "Minor Amendment Areas" (See Section 9. 1~~~"_ ._iD) , These properties represent land which could be annexed into =CiÏy; however';_ sf wlHeli llave Naelied &B agrecm~ with Wildlife Agencies and CDFG and the City on ultimate preserve boundaries.l!î!lllilg.... The largest of the private properties in this Component, aside from the Otay Ranch, is the Watson Land Company property; a 160 acre parcel located north and east of the 1,200 acre Salt Creek Ranch development project and surrouuded on the north and east by the Otay Ranch. The owner of the Watson Land Company bas expressed strong interest in: 1) annexing to the City of Cbula Vista, 2) developing a portion of this parcel under tile policies of the Cbula Vista General Plan (tile current General Plan Low Density designation would permit approximately 226 units), and 3) being included in tile City's preserve plan. In order to develop in the City ofChula Vista, approval ofa GDP and SPA Plan will be required. Inclusion into tile City's preserve plan will require agreement between tile Wildlife Agencies, the City and the property owner. It is the intent of the City of Cbula Vista to identify preserve boundaries on.tIIe Watson Land Company property before fin..li7.ing this Subarea Plan. 28 - t./éJ~ - --. City of Chula VISta MSCP Subarta Awlf't" Plan 4.3.2 Public/Quasi-pubHc LandslProJects in the Otay Ranch Component 4.3.2.1 San Diego Water Utilities . The City of San Diego Water Utiliûes Department owns approximately 2,558 acres of land SUITOundil1g both Upper and Lower Otay Lakes. Preserve plllnnil1g for this land is included in the City of San Diego Ce efSt · - " Subarea P~"~ fB ese - .8. ".; - . :. ~'. .:., .:,.:~. '. ,.' ::::::' '..,. ..,~ :;" ,0 4.3.2.2 Bureau of Land Management While not covered within Chula Vista's Subarea Plan or General Plan, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) controls approximately 860 acres swrounded by the Otay Ranch, east of Proctor Valley and near Callahan Peak. 1f111lI.\šiItiiliaiUim1tii¡iilifj.¡a.iiJil:lf.id____r W:~....... .................. ..,........ ..::;...... ........... .....,.. . .,~~' , "., .,. '~::::::;' -;;:;;;;.;:,-::;:.., .......,'~ :-)K"-;-;m':x:$^ ~.~:::: ,';';'*;''''>:¥.·X';·>;·:·~:-X';·*>X·:-;·;''';'>~>X';':';';':'_»_';';'''''h;'_*. ..;.:.;~..;.;.:.:;" .;;... ;.¡w;...x.;.;.;.;.x, '" ...,.. '. ";';';';':';';':';';'X';':-.-:-: .;.;.'" x .'.... ",.' ., 4.3.2.3 Otay Valley Regional Park The Otay Valley Regional Park Focused plllnnil1g Area (FPA), including the Otay River Valley and many of the drainages into the valley west of the Otay Reservoirs, stretches approximately eleven miles from South San Diego Bay to the Reservoirs. The Otay Valley Regional Park (OVRP) is being plannl'll through a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA) between the County of San Diego, the City of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista. The goal statement adopted for the OVRP is as follows: "The Otay Valley Regional Park will represent one of the major open space areas within southern San Diego County linking south San Diego Bay and Lower Otay Lake. The park will fulf1ll the need to provide a mix of acûve and passive recreaûonal activiûes while protecting environmentally sensiûve areas, protecting cultural and scenic resources, and encouraging compaûble agricultural uses in the park." (see page 1-1 of Lettieri- Mcintyre, 1994) The Focused Planning Area (FP A) of the Otay Valley Regional Park was adopted by the San Diego City Council, County Board of Supervisors and City of Chula Vista in 1993. The draft Concept Plan for the park is described on pages 134-136 of the draft EIRlEIS for the MSCP. In 1995, the OVRP Policy Committee directed funher review of the Draft Concept Plan for the OVRP, and directed that its staff conduct funher review of the Concept Plan, including environmental analysis. The Draft Concept Plan diagram (please see Appendix) consists of the ið.....ificaûon of a proposed regional park boundary, within which is a core area containing environmentally sensiûve open space, a proposed interconnecting regional ttail system, ttail staging areas, proposed recreational development areas, and potentially one or more nature intetpretive centers. Also included in the draft Concept Plan are special study areas which will require future analysis. The foll~ are elf':Jllm'~ of the Draft Concept Plan: 29 - '/-1- .--- City of Chula VISfa MSCP SubartO PIwM., PIa" · The environmentally sensitive open space area of the proposed regional park consists of wct1aDd areas (including the Otay River), biologically sensitive areas subject to preservation and resOurce ~hAnr.ement, and habitat linkages. The boundaries of this area are consistent with the Multiple Habitat plAnning Area (MHP A) boundary contAi""" within the draft Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP). It may permit some active aDd passive recreation uses, such as trails, consistent with the guidelines of the MSCP. · The prOposed "regional trail system" is intended to link: to the Bayshore Bikcpath to the west and serve as a continuing link as part of the envisioned Chula Vista Greenbelt trail system, a 28-mile mil system encircling the City of Chula Vista, and parts cast of the Otay Reservoirs. Trails within the Otay River Valley will uti1iz.c tire and utility roads wherever possible in order to minimize impacts. · The "recreational development areas" identified on the draft Concept Plan include both existing and proposed active and passive recreation sites. Many of these sites also contain existing private development potential through zoning .or development approvals and will require additional land use analysis prior to adoption of a regional park master plan. The following areas are identified on the draft Concept Plan: - Existing rock quarry (approx. 135 acres) on Rock Mountain, cast of the mouth of Wolf Canyon: the quarry operation is expected to continue for approximately 50 years, after which the site may be used for active recreation. - Gun ClublBird Ranch: This area and the area (approximately 22S acres) cast has been a gun club and ranch and would not be used for habitat management purposes under the draft Concept Plan. - Lower Otay County Park (approx. 70 acres): an existing but closed campground; to be refurbished. - The existing County Air Park, located cast of Lower Otay Reservoir, south of Otay Lakes Road: used as a landing field aDd observation area for gliders and parachutists (approx. 60 acres). - The Otay Rios Industtial Park: piA"""" for a multi-purpose amphitheater on disturbed or prior development land (approx. 200± ~). . · A "natiue interpretive center" is envisioned near the salt ponds located at the mouth of the Otay River. In addition, the Otay Ranch Rcsoun:c Management Plan (RMP), Phase I, calls for a nature interpretive c:cntcr to be located within the open space preserve on the Otay Ranch. · The following are identiflcd as "special study areas" on the draft Concept Plan. A determination of appropriate land uses for these areas will be subject to future analysis: 30 _ (jd-- --- " _._- ---- -- _n ..____ -. . -.- - _.- City ofChula VISta MSCP Subarea PM.",., Plan . - Open space sites located on previously disturbed bcDches north and south of the Otay River, within the Otay Ranch, The approved Otay Ranch RMP calls for the provision of a minimIJID of 400 acres of active recreation, to be emphasized within the Otay Valley. These sites will be subject to future special studies to detcnninc the appropriate use of this open space (See also Section 6.3.2 for additional information regudiDg these sites) , - Potential' recreational development site located north of the Otay River, west of Beyer Way. This site will be subject to future study to detenniDe its local/regional recreation or private development potential. - The Otay landfill, located approximately 1h mile north of the Otay River. With ultimate closure of the landfill, potential active/passive recreation opportunities will be studied. 4.3.2.3.1 Imolementation Measures Implementation of the open space preserve within the proposed OVRP will occur through adoption of the OVRP Concept Plan and subsequent Master PIan(s) for the regional park. .~1IIDIl! .. . . . , ... .. - -.". ~ "'.;;$:«;>;:::;:;;;:;:;:,-:;.::3;;;:;.;" ..,... .~.....,'.;..:'.. (1)~'I.1i .::::1'::::::''=~' ..,. , ',.' ;::"~;:::"~":;::';;:; . , 31 -~3--, "--...- ___.n ~_..- ----- _u _ -...- - -.- -.--- Cir¥ of Chu/a VIStD MSCP Subarta Aw,,,,. Plan 4.4.1.1 Imolementation Measures The City approved the San Miguel Ranch GDP, subject to CODdiÛODS, whiCh must be complied with prior to approval of the fU'St SPA Plan for the project (See City of Chula Vista City Council Resoluûon No. 17049 for condiûoDS). A number of discretionary acûons are required, including: a SPA plan, . detachments and annexaûoDS, tentaûve subdivision maps, and take-authorizaûoDS to permit the take of all Covered Species, including those species not presently listed as F.nd"l\g~red, Threatened or Candidate Species under the ESA or the CESA. Miûgaûon measures, identified in EIR-90-02 and adopted with the approval of the GDP (Resoluûon No. 17049) are idenûfied in the EIR, -~~! II~- .~", .' 32 - '/<1_ City ofChula VISta MSCP SubørtØ PM"".. Plan .X:;>;; - :.;.;.¡,' ''':~~~~';:;:;';'''' ~~~;.:{. ..~.::' :v>«''''';':'ù:--:ox:;'' ^ ... 33 _1././', City of Chulo Vista MSCP SubortD PM",,, PIon " 34 - Vb - -- ~-- - -- -- - City of Chula VISta MSCP Subarea ~..... Plan r·· .' .~. ;' .';. ~. :,;:....'. )f'}...;::::;:.:$..w..:.AAw. ,', .::.~ I~Pm - "'I"". ,,,'" IBI' if_" ,<" , ", ~.,. ',:e; r"" w, , '_fj:~ItI<~>'- ,'.<:;f, 'ih """" "iP'.' 'No_, 1 -'I£""""B""" "if""'. '. ïttYa' \\ m ': 1m 3U;I\!!1 tìt: 01t' YJJd &'it¡¡:, iw ' '^~"^"3 ,-),,) ,'" ',-( , ,," ,', ~i~'_~)"'IÍ"."._-""".?"'¡%""'~:"""··""'<'·''"~'"n: ,'" '- " ]~ftifii~.}mai'" "'^' 11'- , ,'W' "IiìIIW¡JI·" , '",< a:.. ~ "'''~'r':''^~'<, ..-.r_",J.; ':" ~C,'< "'<S'"~";'''*\ ^!J~ :»"»:.,;. '«"X;0"'_~~~' __' . m '..' . 35 - tf'J- - . .-. - ---- ·- -- City ofChula VISta MSCP Subaml PlwMw Plan - . .' 36 - t{t- Cily of Chu/o V"tsto MSCP Suborro JllwOR" Plan 4.4 B8BÎt8 C81Bp8øeat 4.4.1 SBB !'IOpel D_-eIt 1.2.1.1.] Jteøuested Pteieet ERHtlemeøt:S 'Ate IlIBtIe1\'Ber ee the BIIB Miguel Røøek is prepesiøg NvisieØ!l te the Ceøera!. PlIIB IS weH IS the aPIINY. QÐP. 11Iese prejeet eøâdemeBtl, whieå are Ii5ted lIelew iB SeeBes 1.2.1.1.1, ,,'ill fel(IIÏfe fII!tåer eS';ÏfeBll'leBtaI w;iew IIBtI deelllBesHiâes pIIr'--' te the Califeæia Bw.<ire1llBeBtal QIIIIIky f.et ("œQ · ") .. . U.1.1.1 1=eMBtive C8MidefBtieM.(}..Re8mSøæ k is llie YSPV!S's, llie CÐPG's IIBtI Cky's iBteøt èat lIeeallse meat ef the Nefèeæ Pereel ef SIIB Miguel R8ftek has sigBiHeet regieBIII lIielelieal '18hte, eeØ!lidef8tiaB slteøW lie li'/ea te 88l1UisiBes IIBtI prete_8ft aM iBelttsieB as part af tljs S1iè8fe8 PJøø. T..eBfatŸ:e &preeæes! te maÏB thee_ NeftBefft PareeIIlBtl put ef the S8IIIIieæ Pereel as pr--R8st apea spaee far haBitat preseF'Ve pllfl'eges lias lIees reBelied II$vIIS llie YSFWS, CÐPG IIBd the lede'il'Ber, aa Ellllarea PIe :\ltefBBtWI '}:v;e (sIIe·}.'B 8S Figure 2). The teB!eâ-¡e BlReæeøt lteP:¡eeø !he l'eseæee egeøeies aød ØIe JUðJ'eft)* 8\-mer is eel11ÏBgeBt øpeø the saHsfaeâsø af a B1:Ißlher af eeæièeæâeæ set laRk èele~¡¡: a. Cky Celløeil Bppre';aI af lIB e...lf811 reaideøtial1Hlit tetal ef II ! te 1, 19ã dWIHiøg 1HIiIs (iBelutliBg aft 8I'l'r87&1 as 18 a I'ereeøæge sf lHge let fesideBtiel 1HIiIs). Te 'aeilete pessiele appre\'aI, the IlIIIie7:øer is fellUe9âBg a Cpt~ICÐP l1.meBdJReat te the IaBd 11ge dlaìgBMieØ!l eB the a9\Hfteæ parell ef SIIB Miguel Røøek. 'Ate C~· reeegBÍ1!85 that the prepesed pl'Ðjlet meN eertaiB leeal IIIld fegiaBØI Bielagieal èjeew"lallBtl èat II ! te. ,g~ ef the pfajeet aM weøld 111 iBekided iB èe Cky'a pfeseF'Ve bitt will eeØ!liåer llieal faetefS as weH as øèefs IIlfere maIEiBg a fiBaI deeisies es the prejeet, 11. 'Ate C~' IIftd IlIBtIewøer Belæawledgl that the dœft MSCP lias pfe'lisieØ!l ealliøg fer Geøeæl Pl. .AmeøElmeBt6, elu5ter me-:-g, let w:eægiBg, FP9feRiBg af tle-¡elepæeøt FÎgI1t6 111'''' ether metkeds fer aHe'."liøg AeJlillilify iB prejeet deaÍIB te ....-1 the aplS spaee IIBtI fesewee preteetieB ebjeeWI8B ef the lIECP PlIIB. e. Pue te llie regieBIII sigRiAenl''Je sf èe NeRltem Pereel te the esÞ1Iw'--eøt ef the pfell8fVe fer the M8CP PIaB IIBtI this SuIl_a PIaB, the City aelæewledglo that the presePI'aûas ef the Nel'tàeæ Pareel eeBStitlHes a oigøifieam --II ......a.ew--"Y lIeøefit te the resideøtø ef the Cky IIBtI the regieø, IIBtI that pl'8sefVBtieB ef a paRies ef the Þrel'tàeæ PereeIJRBy Bet etliefwiøe eeellf' threugk the .e~;.lapmeBt enaeâaB pf8e188. d. Prejeet le-:eI lIialegieal _PBlte IS tile 8811tMm Pareel1\'euld 111 fllHy JRHigated .' WHB implemematies ef the 'l'8serve lI8Uø:!-~ee depieted SB Fipfe 2. PeftÍeØ!l ef the ÞreRlteæ Pøeel . that IIf8 aet eøkided er stlulI'wiøe IIsell te ~·liIitigate '-[Blts EappfeJ"'_Ate~ lfífí 88rea), er l'8'111Íf8d te 111 dedieated aa aplB &JIaee tllr81llk pfejeet appfe':ala I'8su1âøg Hem de':elepJReBt ef the EÐ1Ièeæ 37 -lf9 - -~ .._. City ofChulo Visto M$CP Suboreo !IrrøF... PIon Pareel, æey he aellllÌfed &y èird l18ftÍea tMellgh fair _fit \'llløe lIaymeBtø te !lie laftllewøer. BRei!. &ere eB die BeRliefB paree! iø aBfJUlBed te have "llf8waleBt he"_t value. " e. Cs~;ePlle fer the 9ta1 Tarpleøt, M!Nted ..ptefS, 8Bd 1ke ~-'¡fePBia CBemt1 Wreø ill IIre-¡ided far ÎB dIis EllhBPell PlBB fer !lie EBB Migue11lPÐ.Îeet ÎB die ay. that diese lJIeeiea are Bet _kided ÎB !lie MECP Cav_d Elleeias List. f. ..\Jd1aøglt fuBds far aelJØisæSB af ,ema. 8f the BaRk ,&reel are Bet HSUPH sr JU8I1Ifttr"l, the YEFWE, the CÐF(J BBd die Cky will eeÐllaf8le __01 IBMBiBgfuHy asøillt !lie lBBdewøer is effefts te ÑBd asquiskisB, if B8ee9S~·, af Sltes8 ,efÛeBØ ef the NeflJ!em Parse! EiB asear..lA-re wHIt lIaragt'IIfJh "£I" ahev~, ÌBeIIIdiBg eeøsideratiaft ef!lie IIlIhlie f_iBg medlells set fertli ÎB !lie MECP. ~ee MECP rU.fi~, er e!lier fuBIIiBg æedleth that æey he d8'"leleped fer this IIlIIJIese. 1.:U.U '~2et&tieBlJla1IÍtBt Bf ~aR Mi~el RaRek The }!Ilsl'eRy has heeB SUJ'\·~·etI 8Ð part sf the eerlier eøHdeæeBt ,rseess fer die appre-¡ed 8aB lliguel RimeII. CDP. The Held 9IIr:eya eeBElileted were _ell'ereted ÎBte !lie MECP CIE dete hase, If differeøees eeellf hew/eeø Held tetals BBII tIte dete IIlfJe, !lie Held teføls for the IIFajeet slt81ild lie fegarded as !BSle aeeuf8te. Tahles 1 lit 2 iBdieete the aereage ef sigBifinm eft site llahitet 18 lie I'Nsert:ed. 1.2.1.Uí IøtsleæeJHBtiBB ).(eaSOFeS If eeæiåeæisæ "a" tMeøp "C" ahe-.. are met, a' CSBgepr.,æsB !.geemeBt ~. "e eøtel'ed iBte lIeWleeft the Cky, the UEFWE, !lie CÐPG BBd!lie lBBdewøer 18 fwotker defiBe!lie lIelieies set fa.. ÎB the 118CP &BEl this SHarea PI.. The "A.JN8Øleøt, _I.An "e seøsisteat \VHk die ,eUsies set feFtk ÎB .1.:.. S\I¡'Bfea Pie, The falle·....ÎBg are dilleP8tielllll'Y _eøs that will rellUÌfe allllP8'¡øl hy die City: II. CeøePBI PlBB AmeødæeøtlCÐP .\meødæeøt. ¡,. .... EeetieB81 Pl8BBiBg !_-ea ("81'-/.") PIe, iBelødiøg 8 ",wr eeæePl/MÏeB 1'1&8, 8Íf' IfUIIlfty ÎlBpFe"/eæeøt 111&8 BBd a lIèlie faeilities ~---~iBg 1l1aø. e. Pessi1l1e CeRty ef EBB 9iege 8J111re\'!II ef 8 hyp8IJS Fead er 8 CeøePBI Pløø ECireølatisB BlelBeBt~ "~/,....-..I-eBt. d. PeHi¡'le ---elllttieø ef die IIrðjeet area te die City &eæ die CBUBty af EBB Diege. a. .' --,_aft 18 geudt Bay lPfigMieft 9i&trift. f.. Pessi1l1e deteeløøeøt freæ 9t&Y. Wafer 9i&trift. g. Pessi1l1e IIIBefI.fIIB. te Eeudt Bay Irrigatieø 9istriet Sphere. 38 - S-o~ - . City of Chu/a VtStD MSCP Subaml JIM..... Plan It. getl-'--est frem Ba. SuBøyøide fire Pfeteetias 9is&iet. i. CeB5eRft8ø .·4feemeB~r¡elepæeBt ."'.",eelBeBl. j. Tellfllthe Suèdi7iøiaB 1IIp(~lMøœF Tellfllfive Mep. k. ...._1_- aøt:ØelÏMHsBft 18 pePlBÎt the talE! sf all Ce-;ereEI Epseies, iøekuliøg 1:11858 lIJIeeies øet pfeseøäy IiIHeti 88 BE'''-''Igered, TI1reefeøell aF C_illllte Speeies 1I-"'F èe BS/. aF èe CB8.\. MftigMiaB lBea8ltreS, illeBâfiell iB SIR 9Q ~ _ adepteE\ wiè èe IPPf8"eI af èe GÐP (ResahHieB Na. 17919) 1M are iBeløllell wftftiB èe eeBte!tt ef 1 teBtMÍ':e IgreemeM h$\'eBB èe a'W'Ber, tke Celifal'BÏl 98f!&.I.h..!Bt af Fish _ CllHle _ die Y.8. Fish _ Willllife 8erviee. 'ßIÌs lIgfeeJBest geøefBHy pre-:iåes fer 11§ aeres af epeR spas. aøè hatdtat ,rese"! as the 8eøéem Parèel, 1" aeres af the þJ aftfteæ Pøreel ta he pfeseR'ell 88 fulllBiâgMies fer prejeet 18':91 hialagieel Í!Bplet8 as èe 89\tdtem Pøreel lIe...elaplBeftt, eSB5ervatisB 8ft1ll aF aet¡Øisftias af èe remaiB4er af èe Þ Janheæ PareeI (lJ'prenimately 1,686 aepe~, 1B&BBgemeBt sf the pfeSefVe 8:BtI reteøâSB sf die appfe\°eä laBEl 1IS8 desigBatiens fer these llRt1s that are Bet sueees&ÑI1y aeqøifed. U 9œy Røøelt C8IBpaøeøt 4.5.1 Otøy Røøelt U.1.l Re(tJlemd Preise! EøHdemeøHl The lande-:}ftefs af tile OMy Raøek are I're,esÏBg NVisiSB6 19 tfte Ceøeæl PIs as 11:811 as die appæ-.'ed GÐP, These Jlfejeet eBâtleJBeBts, ·:.-WeIl are listed hela',-¡ iB Eeeties 1.!.1.2, will fequire f\IJ1Ber ew:ÎfsBlBeøtel re-lÏew IBfI dSNlBeBtaasB p\H'Ølt8Bt te tit! CalifePBia BBvifeæøeBf:&l Qualify I.et ("CEQl."). 4.U.2 TeRf:8tŸ:e C8MideøæeM,(}_HeeæeBHI T:he YEFV.'S. CFC, èe Ceuøty af 88ft Ðiega --.. èe City af CItuIa 'Jista _.'9 hees IIiIe1IøsiBg peteBâel eansideRHÏsøø ar 19f8elBeBtø wiè vBÁ9US J!r9J!e~' eWMfB af~' D---k. tke ..suits sf wWeIl v;eølll -filet èe pfeseP\'9 lIesÎgB. 'Ate reøuks af tkese te_VB 81f981B911ts ef eaøøitlertHisøø repfefJeBt Suhuea PIeB ..\kePB&tŸ:e 'h.-a. Ee! l..ppeMBt fer øigøifielftt ,8R site vel_B8R aefeage te ", '!'eBerl/ei. TIle fallev:iBg tesati·:e 19f8eJBests ar eaøøid8f8l\aøø ha'Je heel! lliseusoell _ eaøøûmte 1 pames af SuIJana PIøB A:ke_ø..-e 'þ,¡a! I. Belllwiø CalBp8fty '¡:elØØÌ".'9 AtrUlBeøt i .' 1. ]!liœimHieø ef 9tF: Raneh GDP/gRP J)!r,~I~BlB8Bt ]!BØdeæeBH; 39 - 5"'/_ --- . _. -- City ofChulo Vista MSCP Suborta 1I'rI.""" PIon 'R1e Seødt Ca~'/9tay Raøek U8CP 8!tèllfell Pie "1\111 èe I'repared, &Bd dte eta)" Reek G9Pl8RP PIs -Hill },. amrBded, ts eU-:-...te develepæeæ eøâdrmeø.ts fef tke fellev.'ÌBg IfeM &BEl te desigBete lftIek IlfeI!5 I'IH't af dte M8CP PfeseFl/e. ~. £eøtral PIaater 'hH~' (9tay Pr--I! 'MIlage H, Eee AJ!l'eøëix 19.1.1, éMil!it 1). (1) FYI: :\l'l'reJèmately 19aePeslaaatell westafPfeetarValley Reali lIesignated "U" èy dte Qæy RaøeiI. C9P/8RP eafttllÏBiÐg IIJ!I'I'ØJtimateIy 29 1I',,:elliøg !tRits. ~ P'.t2: !.pl'reJèmately 1Q &ePeS aB dte east sille af ',q¡¡age 11, lIesigøatell "U" èy dte 9tay RaBel! C9P¡8RP, eaBtainiøg al'l'l'ØJtimateIy ]! H'elliBg 1IBÌfS. (]) p',(] ! .\,pfeJ(imatel~· 119.2 aeres sf laød is *e ss\Hhem psmeR af Village 11 åesigB&teå 13y tlte Otay RaøeIt GDP/8RP 8S "U.fY 3" A-.I "LM¥ 2", eeøttiiBiBg IIJ!f)rallÎft1ftte1y 299 IIv/elling 1IBÌfS. fè). ReGert '.'illage (Village U, Eee t.pl'eæiK 19.1.1, EnRæit 2) (1) Rl ¡ ".J!IIraKÎft1fttely 19.5 _s af 1&Bd iB die easteæ l'emaB af'Village 13 designMed "L2" 13y *8 Oæ,- Ranek CQPI8RP, eeBt8ÏBing 8ppFexiœMely 81 d~¡¡elliBg tiIIH&. f2) IU: /4'I'F8niœMely 88 &eRa af ale'¡el8J'meBt is the e&Stem pameR sf '/illage 13 åeBigBMed "IJ.f'l 3" hy the ~. RaøeiI. CDP/ERP, eeatt1iBiBg 8PI'f8XÏIBMely 261 d-.velling BRits. (3) R3: hJ!I'I'ØKÌlBllteIy 9 aePes af .'elal'æeøt iB dte easteFB l'artieB af '.'¡¡Iage B lIesiglllltell "1M\' 3" è)" dte Qæy RaøeII C9PiERP, eefttlliBiBg al'I'reJtimateIy 27 tf'¡¡elliBg 1:JBÌf5. (Iij. Ealtdteast af dte . -tEe (¥üIage U. See :\I'peæm 19.1.1, &æH!it ~ (1) 8él! ^J!I!1'Ø1Iiæately 12 &ePeS sf Ilevelsl'æeBt iB dte aeévrest pelties af '..'illege 15 IlesipateII "'.'UI,7" èy dte Gte)" n___,- C9P/SRP, eSBtAiRil\g 8plJre!lÎBl8tely Hi 117lelliøg 1IBÌfS. f2) 882: t.J!I!I'ØJèmateIy 18 aePes af lIe"lelsl'æeBt iB dte øs1ttltwest ,eRisR af Village IS lIesigBatell "''UI.7" èy tile Gtey R8Bek CDP.'SRP, eaBt8iBiBg IIJ!l'l'ØKÌlBlltely 17 tbJelliøg 1IBÌfS. 2. .\treaa øf Deve1QBlBeRt hlltled 18 the 9tw: RAW" GDP/RIU? 40 -S;J.- City of Chulo Vista MSCP Subarea lWH",., Plan 'FIle SetHh CINB!y/Ofay R8Beh MSCP SèBrea PIe 'I'iII "e PFepared, _ die ~. ¡¡A--I!. GÐP/SRP will "I &IBeBEIed, te desigøate die felle1\'ÍIIg BreI5 15 dl'.'tIlepa"le --.I rEeve neB UlI5 Rem die Qtay R8Beh PreseP'l'e. ~. P8fii Ceyea, (See .\l'I'elHliK 19.1.1, BMihit 1) 'f --II ÌB Otay RaBeh. Villages 0Be __ 'fwe, .,:8. alPHas RaøeheP8 fPl) Vl.iIIlJe tlesigaatetl d~¡eleI'811Ie fer N9itleøtial1lgeP9 Sf fef die eeBStNeH8B af ,Bitlis iBfIuWeeøre, ~rimørilJ· Øœøge ",,:es1Ie, ælated HlHies _ a walley l~. 'Ate eJEpA-..Ied NsitleRt1A' .ae·:elepæeBt &PetL9 ~~ ~ Raøek 8¥J1f1erslHp VI:iY 1111181 appre-:-..tely I1g B8NS (!.'illage Oøe 11I11 Villege 'fvI?e e8lBhiøe~ --of eeBt&ÏB a Inøt1 tlse .esigDlltieB ef "l.M3", pel'HliØÏBg 129 ØIIÌf5. De7e1eplBeBt wellld &lse "e p8l'lBiøed ÍB die 1iIB&l1 Welf OmyeB flBger "eRì'leB 'MIlage 2_ \tiIIege ], eøørelHly elBÌtied ffem .":elepæeBt as a peteBâaI &':ie eePPÎ.dsr liøked te Peggi Ceø}"SØ EN). .\11 these 8I'e&9 (Villages 1, :1 __.3 ]) 'WrY) he Mme·."eeI ffeæ the g~. RaBek ReseHfee PHse,,'e elf eKalllded Rem !lie MSCP PFes8f'\·e. 'RIe Feggi CeyeB &fea el5t ef Peaee Raøehere, "ew:.eB Village Oae _ ytile!e 'Fwe, i5 aet part ef die Otay Raøek PfegeFl'e, er ef die DNa USCP FUSefVe "eeaHse die _ eeBt8ÎB!i lew lIUaIify, ære_d ed iselated ha"Haftl, øét su&æ.iM\!Jle iø die leB! tefIB. BBHtleæeBftI IBIIY "e appre-." --.I tlEivelepæeBt IBIIY preeeed ÍB diet lifeR ,.sulting ÍB !lie de'}elapmeRt ef easHpied ha"HHi. PefÛeøs af the laM west af P&øee Reøehele fPl) are B8t wHhiB ~. R8:Bek 8V.B!F8IHI'. TI1ese l'repefties waHld "e geveffted "y dlis 8!fe8RieBt _ "i\'etlld ael "e iøelllded ÍB die EI!tiBreR PregeFl'e. DevelsJ3æeBt eBtitlem~_Bt fer dies! ,{speroes ~'9ø1d he HtefAti-ød hy die City sf Chllla '.'iMa, effeew.~e .p8B aøøexatisø. E"~. Village Fe1Ir (Eee !"l'I'elHliK 1 9 .1.1, lOOIihit 1) RMl :Reek Mw·-·-iR. :Eftp.._... die de9JetepæeBt area ÎR Village FØI:H" te iøelH. ap¡,reKimately 79 Berea reøghIy laeated es Reak MellBl8ÍB _ Ìll8rel5e die l'el'HlÎ!lsiIIle BlHBtler ef dwelliBg ØIIÌf5 1\'idHB Wlage Fetlr "y J§9 ØIIÌf5 (die leeHieB ef _. ØIIÌf5 will "e 1Ietefooø:-e" "y die 1_ Hse j1lrisdieâeB direugl!. die CDP.'ERP ameøèæeBt preees~. ~. Yillage 19 _ 11 (£ee !4'I'eødiK 19.1.1, BJœiI!it §) (1) sm, 9tay 'hH~' Read, øe&ligB Gay 'jalley Read,qÑBte PørlEwBy IBHwtIÑ æ die Rlad alipmeRt .!pieted ÍB FigunI Ii (?4Hal!. reøgWy llfUI.tes æ !lie a.1¡g;.-'Rt eeRWtiBeII ÍB die Otay R8:Bek nl.--e 2 Pregress PIeR). f2) EC2 'JiHage 19 _ 11. &p_ die de-JelepmeBt _ ÍB ,qullles 19 --.I 11, IlIÐW.wd Ie aIM die 1111\'ly -\W-EI Otay ¥aIIes' Rea4JHliBte Pørkway, aEldiøg al'l'n "i--~' 93 aeres ef H\'elepæeat wid! a 1--01 use desigllaâeB ef "lUV 1.§", pel'lBittiBg appre)l:--teIy 1'9 1lBit!. 'AliI 1\iH .tie a IBÌBer 8djw~_L1 ÍB the ~allfipfaâeB sf die atijaeeat eElR'l-~'I'Hk æ ell51ll'e dIøt die ... eeBlaÍB!l 2§ .reo ef "Jia"1e park laBd. (8m) ~. ,quage þliøe (See !.Pl'elHliß. 19.1.1, &thi1:Ik §) 41 _.53- ~ City of Chu/o Vrstø MSCP Subareo ",-" Plan EC1 Eeøth af 9fay VeIIey ReM. _".1111 IppF8JdmeteIy 19 aeres iB Wee sew de-;elsJllBløt aœas te '.'illage ).liRe se_ af Otay ,talley Read ee---sâøg the exi&tiøg feør .-:eleI'Mest "hlæs" . 1=Be 11IIIII1Ige jurisdieâaa III8Y _Iaeate 'MIlage tliBe ilwelüBg tIIIits ta tIie &fea .eøth af Ot&)' V-aHey ReM. :a. 911181 C8B6idemti8RB (a). Cify af (:kllla 'Jiøta OBtI the C~' af EIB Diega will lIeerease lIeasæes wHhiB die ~. Ib--k trlBøit "JtHege ea_ Ham IB a'lerege af 18 1I·.velliBg tIIIits ,er aere Ie 11.' lI'l;elliBg tIIIits ,er aef8, FllsøIfÏBg iB a lie_lie af 1,9§7t111its (Villeges I, " (j aB¡' 8). Ell). Drøft the MECP Marea PlIB r-¡' ameBII the 9fay RaBek CDP/EßP 8BŠ related deeømeMB te elimiBate 8e8fJt&l 68gB ~ aød -~..~-- BUeeølet 8eNh æiâgaâSB NEfUÎleæeBt6 fer rest8HH9B. EIij. CalifaPBia Der-t..h..!Bt af FiøIi .-.. Came agree. Ie appra','!! tIie estaèlishfBeBt af a IIaèitøt MaiBteBlBee DisMet Ie fuBII the 9fay P-I1-k IleS8IßIM PreoeP'le p__ Ie the pre-¡isisøs af the Haêifat :Þ.faÍRtenaøee ];}ÌfHfiet I.st. E~. 1=Be pll'ties &gFee Ie øuppert tIie esta8lishmeøt af a felleflll wildlife refuge far tfte lIesiguatell Otay Røøek epea spaee areas eHt af the 9Iay Reservair. ~aa tIie estaèlisluBeRt af sulik a Fllfuge, tIie ftsk IBII Willllife AteMY 'will 8e lIesigBate4 the Qay P1Y101i Preserve O\-.'ftef/:Þ.faøager far th8se l'emSBB af the Clay Raøek PtegePJJe that lie ""HhiB the refage. Tke City 11IIII die CallÐty will dlereafter rellliÎfe that 9t&)' RaBek Jlnsen.. 111IIII 8e eew:eyeEI Ie tfte Willllife Refuge, eensisteBt with die I'le7isis1l8 af the ~. RaøeII CDP/8RP, DIP aM Pte~'e CeB~/ey&Bee PIIB. · -"\4 eaw,'eyell te tIie Willllife Refllge shall 8e the --:-'----ee FIIspaBlli8i1i1;y af tIie FiøIi --.. Willllife ht;eøey ar Hs lIesigBee, 1I'illlBIIt (1BIII8i11 assitteBee feBlB asseoSlB8Bt llifltriels ar ether flBlll8iBg sr eKaetiaa meehaBi.1Iftl5 impasell 8Y die City af CJæla ',~ ar the CBllBty af EIB 9iega. (41). "Aie ,arties Bgfe8 dlat 1ke iBiHal Otay n__-It Pf88eFVe p.:----iøg PlIB p,agl'8:lB '¡;ill 8e eslilllHshell Ie geBeflte nfHeieBt Wl8lt111S Ie IIOAi---:- tIie eøâPe 9fay P---'" Presel've "l:illlallt tfte ereaHÐB af a Wildlife Reflige. II8'We\~r , if a Wildlife. Refuge II!I5UIBt!S _A:-MBBBee le9p8BÐæHit:)" fer I'reaerve 1--.... the flflt pPie"!)" fer .¡e_IS tlŸ:ePled hili IB8ÎBteB1Bee af reflige 111IIII shall 8e far 9tay RaøeII PreseFl'e Owøefll,l--~ger t-~hr ""1·...:- the westem ,aNaRl Ðf tIie PreseFl8, wJliIlk were Bat iBiHeIIy i\'ß:!,1I dlr8lllk the .....u., 2 ~ ..----e meehARi- (speeifieaHy tIie e0t88lislHBeBt IlllllIMiBteBllRee af a tIatuft! IBtelpreti'... Ceølef -r¡' researellllllll __aa pf8gt'BtBS asseeieted '.villl the NetIHe lBterpreft\'e eeBtef lB. die 9tay \~ey Regialllll Park). (~, 'Ate SeBllæ','e ReS811fe8 EN4y (8N) area ee---:-ell wHhiB tIie Oray ","-k Resert 'liHage (YiHage U) r--'I tie eeiliÐveEI frem the 9fay ~~nrk QÐP.'ERP --.. Etete --.. : fellel'll aleøeieo AhAn 88t e8jeet Ie III!'JeleplBellt af sueli BreIS JI1II'Ø'llIRt Ie the 9tay ß4Iøeh CDP.'ERP. 42 -~4- ----- City of Chulo VISta MSCP Subal't/l ilNNIw Plan ~. "R!e gate ØBd. FeEleNl ReSettree .....48øeies .pee te ÌflØII8 Beesssary "talir Jl8HBHs" fer the dr:lleplMBt ef Qtay Rnøm eeøsi&leøt witI1 the IIBt 1151 llØHlemeBH eeB··'-rll iø thl ~ RaøeIi GÐPl8RP III Øledifiedlhre\tgli the ÌØlplelBt!BtlltieB ef IIIiø &peeIMllt 4. IJI9.ÐlemeBt:BH8B Pres!s! 'Alis II_Øleat 5JIøI11Ie implemeøtell lIIreøgli the faHawiøg praeess: ~, SullIIfeII PIeø, The City ef Qllla '.tiøtø 11III the ~euøty ef SBB . Diega -1..-11 'feeeed wi. *e de-:eluþJB8Bt af their fe0JJ8eti-Je MECP Sø1una p¡-;...- vdiiH ÍBee!peæte tll.e 9tey Reek PkHIBiøg .\fea. 'Ate Suhareø PlIHIS Ife8 -1..-" Nßeet the "87iøieøø af the Olaf Røel1 GDP/SRP III pfepased fer mellmeêeB IIy IIIiø ltIfeeæeøt. Per these areas fer1\1HeIt it is pfep8sell tllat 8\lffeRt 9tey RBBeIt de':elepØl8Rt emidemeR& lie ~'-iRAtetI (SeedeR a alle"J~, the SuIlI1fe11 PIeø shøH JlFe'/ille diet kIlEe peHBHs will øet "e a1lèefiHd. Fer tll.sal IlfeI5 far 1\1HeIt it ie prapasllI diet allditieøa1 llfeaß af IIÐ'/eleplBeRt "e auèetii!8d (EeesaR" a"e\'lI), the Su"1Ife8 PlBB 5JIøI1 pl'8"lide diet tIIke peHBHs will he a1Hkerimed. The Sèllfea PlIHi te~ 5JIøI1 alss iRee17am. the I'fs-¡iøiaB5 ef "9tlier CaBfiitlemtieBB" a9 disBØsseå iB EeæeB e a1!wJe. ~). MSCP Preeees. 'Ate Mares PI--A shøH III 8llII_aell te tll.1 City af Em Siege fer iBeløSi8B ÎB 'dte pe-;ised Þ.IECP, iBeløåiBg aeees88IY eø-;ÎfeBlBeBteI ft 't:iew. ~. Ell!. Qøe. 'Ate City ef ClNla Vista A_" the CIMIB~ ef EIR Ðiege eIIell eeRtinlle praeeesiBg the 9œy RaøeIi SPl. 9Re applieasell11III I'8latell deeumeRfS fiøelødiRg IIIIt øet limited te tll.e SPl. Gøe teRtative 11IIII", the ClNla 'Jisf8 Spl1ere af lølkteøee, the iIIHiel ~. RBBeIt IllReJilHÏeR, tll.e ~. Reek 9vefaH ÐesigB PIeR 11III 9tey p.--" .....--e 2 1Q~. (~. Ceøentl Pliæ .\ØIr-"-es. SeeR after III'PI'8'.-.I ef tll.e 9tay ~r--h SP.'" 9Re l.amI PIM, teRtllti':e BlIp 11III the lllRee8eR ef EP.'" Qøe iBte the CftoJ· ef Chøla Vista, the Ballw.iB CelBPIlßY sftall iBHiate Oeøeflll PIeø ."\meRdmeBt IIJIplieaâeæ tMeugIt tll.e City ef Chllla \tista &Bd the Ce1:lBty af EaR :Biege seelåBg plM amem'-eBtB t8 :'fleæeBt tile sempeR.8m Bud_if ÍB a, it, and e a"e-:e. It is 1Iftè8fStead diet III a pl'Ì';ate appliellftt, the III'plielRt shøH pay full eest reee':ery fees fer die I'18eeSBÌBg af the Ceneral PIIB /. ---JlMeBfø. I. :¡:. . tMIRIZ ~. .\H paftie& 'lJRIlet'8t811111II8t ..:_, is ef the eeseøee, witII. reSJ!eet te the prepllf88ea, re','ie1\' IIfMI aettea eR UECP daeuØleBt8 r-" SP I. Qøe related deeuæ8IHS (es eøt!'-AII a"e\'~. IIBpleæeRtasea af tll.e MEa> Su"area PI_ &gNSØI'S is a ~\stiI1" m;" &eJlarate presese frSØI the preeessiøg ef EP.'" 9Be related lIe81Hll8IHS. Imp eærlltalÍellef ...,- .greemlBt dees aet fIItUÏIe delay sf the timely eeBÐillefll8eR ef SPA Que related appliealÍeøs. Ta 1he e8BH81'y, failllftl te preenll witII.. SPA 9Re related IIpJ!Iiea8søs jeepaPlliHs the ."ilft)· ef The BallkriB C8ØlpMY te . -plemeøt tll.e eleøHIB& ef IlHs agreeØleRt. . 43 -..)J - City of Chu/a VISta MSCP Suborra PNHA., Plan {II), ImplemeBt8BÐB ef ée eleJBeBtø ef .t.,. agreelBeBt is Bet depeBdeøt øpeB I'IISeltitieB ef ewtr-"iBg MSCP issues ÎR':elviBg Otey IæBeIl ,re,edies Bet eeBwlled by The Haldwill CelBt!aøy affiliates. h. Qéer 9tøy ßeBeII FlðpeRy O¥JBefs' 'FeBfas';e t.~ 9IIter ,re,efties wHftiB ée Otay 1iIeBeII, 8VI'BI!d 11)' eøâHeo etller dIøø. ée Haldwill Cem,aøy, lI&<;e heeB ée _jest ef ell. geiBg øegeØøâeBS ".vfiII YSFWS IIBŠ CÐFC fer ,eteBØtH 'I'IIS8f'l:tiieB IIBŠ aellUisHieB iBte tile MECP ,reserve. 'Riese ppopenies, teHIIliBg a"reJfÍlBllteIy 968 _s, _ eørreBdy refleeted ell. tile ade,ted Otay RllBeIl G9P!SRP (SubBna PIeø. AlteRllMi';e One) 88 IIwJiBg d.":ele,1BIIIH ,etelHial. Hewever, ao ée subjeet ef a teBtMÌ".·e agreemeBt bR'eeB tile "8peRy 8WB8f8 IIBŠ YEFWS,IC9FG, these Jlrspefties 11I":8 ),eeB ideøâlÎed fer I'steøHel ae..isæeø fer 8eB5.."aâ8B. If aellUiøæsB 8f theBe IU81'eFties dees 88t eeear, theR epprevN 1_¡¡!leS ·,;,;eøld feIBGÎB ÎB effeet, per ESB8fea PlIB .\ltePII8WJe Qøe,. U.3 IJ' . S' BI~¡erB1W :tte TJøEler SUBarea Plu :\ltefB8tive T'T:;e, 8 tleliBeatisø af BI'8fÛ8B af die tJBiv8f8~' sHe east af Salt Qreek CaøY8B is d8l'ieted 811. die SlIbarea Plaø di&gI'IIIB (See Figufe 2). 'RUø site it leeated &have the ølBfJes diet defæe Ealt Creek CiIft)'8B, ppevideo a hi818gieel eellBeeH8B ffem EaIt Creek IIBŠ die 9tay River 'hlley to the City 8f Eall. Ðiege Celftel'8teæ Lando diet 81I1'f-š bewer Otey Rell8rveir, 1M is esøsidered 19 he seMis.at 9.\"HIt tile .'JlFe-:.. Gl)P¡ERP ,alisies. 'RIis site 88BSR 8f appreJfÍlBllteIy 2Sg &eres aøtI is æAeeteå 8ft 1M Eøltarea Pte8eP\°e Map (See Figure 2). .\lS8 eeBSidered _er .~tel'BllH";e 1>iI'8 is die p8teBHaI pøï'".., Ðf tile eIHÎfe area east sf Salt Ci'8ek CBRYSB (199 aeres) hy tlte \":ildlife &geRBies fer iBeløSiSB in *1 I'fe88F1.'e øy8SeJB, _d aeftUiBiHsB sf 8B altePB&tŸ:e 1H1Ÿ¡efSit:y sHe, aeeepæèle te the CRy af Ckæa '!ism, ~ 8 Ieøtt exeheBge af edier a8eepæble meeliaøi9IB, . - 44 - ~6_ City of Chula VISta MSCP Subarea "'-~., Plan 5.0 CoVERED SPECIES LIST The following list of plant and animal species for which the resource agencies will be providing Take Authorizations is identical to the MSCP Covered Species lisll, ItIIII &8 medifiecl is the City ef Clude 'lists's Iml'lemeøæøeB ..~. It is recognized that not all species des\gJ>ated on the list occur within the City's Subarea Plan. MSCP COVERED SPECIES LI5T .¡~Eî...fil_ Plants Nevin's barberry Felt-leaved monardella San Diego thorn-mint Willowy monardella Shaw's agave Snake cholla San Diego ambrosia California Orcutt grass Ap"ani~ltIa San Diego mesa mint Del Mar man7J1nita Otay Mesa mint Otay Man7J1n;ta Torrey pine (native populations) Coastal dunes milk vetch Small-leaved rose Encinitas Coyote brush San Miguel savory. Thread-leafed brodiaea Gander's butterweed Orcutt's brodiaea Narrow-leaved nightshade Dense reed grass Parry's tetracoccus Dunn's mariposa lily San Diego goldenstar Slender-pod jewel flower Little mousetail Lakeside ceantothus Prostrate navarreÛ8 Wart-stemmed ceanothus Dehesa bear-grass Salt marsh bird's-beak Orcutt's bird's-beak ,6.n¡mlll~ Del Mar sand aster Tecate cypress Salt marsh skipper butterfly Short-leaved live-forever Thorne's hairstreak butterfly Variegated dudleya San Diego fairy shrimp Sticky dudleya Riverside fairy shrimp Palmer's ericameria Arroyo southwestern toad Coast wallflower Calüornia red-legged frog San Diego buuon-celery Southwestern pond turtle San Diego barrel cactus Orange-throated whiptail Otay tarplant San Diego horned lizard Heart-leaved pitcher sage Cooper's hawk - . Gander's pitcher sage Tricolored blackbird Nuttal's lob.1s Golden eagle 45 -.!1- , -- -------_._--_...--~.- City ofChulo VIStD MSCP SubamJ ~. Plan Southern california rofous-crowned sparrow Grasshopper sparrow CAnada goose Swainson's hawk Ferruginous hawk Coastal cactus wren Western snowy plover Mountain plover Northernhanier Reddish egret SW willow flycatcher American peregrine falcon Bald eagle Long-billed curlew Belding's savannah sparrow Large-billed savannah sparrow California brown pelican White-faced ibis California gnatcatcher Light-footed clapper rail Western bluebird Western burrowing owl Elegant tern California least tern Least Bell's vireo American badger Mountain lion Southern mule deer 6.0 LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS 6.1 Existin2 ;;tllndards. Ordinances And Policies 6.1.1 J?e((eral It is the intent of the City of Chula Vista that this Subarea Plan conform with the U.S. Enda.,gered Species Act (ESA), the National Environmenta1 Policy Act (NEPA), and all of the regulations promulgated pursuant to these laws. . 46 _ ,)'7 - City of Chula VISta MSCP Subarea IINHA" Plan 6.1.2 State It is also the intent of the City of Chula Vista that this Subarea Plan conform with the California Enviromnental Quality Act (CEQA), the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), the Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) policies, and all regulations promulgated pursuant to these laws and other sccûons of the California Fish & Game Code, as applicable. 6.1.3 City of Cbula Vista In preserving significant natural open space areas conta;ning babitat that supports sensitive species, the City of Chula Vista utilizes a number of tools and ø>...,hanim1~ to ensure the long-term protection of these areas. The following ordinances, policies or procedural methods are Il;SCd when a development project is proposed: 6.1.3.1 The General Plan Land Use Diagram for the City of Chula Vista, which covers the entire Subarea Plan, bas been prepared pursuant to goa).s contained in the Land Use and Conservation and Open Space Elements of the General Plan text. These policies call for the permanent preservation of significant landforms (steep slopes, canyons, ridgelines, etc.), and the preservation of sensitive plant and animal species. Implementation of the General Plan policies occur through the application of the Planned Community (PC) zone, and the processing and adoption of Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plans. The Land Use Diagram identifies significant areas to be retained as open space, and conversely focuses development within areas that are appropriate for it. The Subarea Plan is in substantial conformance with the General Plan Land Use Diagram and the policies contained therein, 6.1.3.2 Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), bave been and are required for all major projects. Through the CEQA review process, the City of Chula Vista assures that a full environmental assessment be made of a proposed project and where potential impacts are identified, appropriate mitigation is recommended. The preservation of natural landforms, including natural canyons are encouraged through this process. 6.1.3.3 If through the preparation and adoption of this Subarea Plan, associated Implementation Agreement, and Habitat Management Plan, it is determined that the City should adopt separate development policies that address resource protection, then prior to adoption of said policies, and prior to actual "take authorization" for areas outside of approved projects within the City's Subarea Plan, the City shall consult with the Wildlife AgCIICies. Other ordinances and policies which govern resource protection and development regulations includè the following: - Hillside Modifying District (Section 19.52.210 of the lolling Ord~alV'~) - A zoning designation. which regulates development of areas with steep terrain. '. . 47 - :::'-7- - City of Chula VISta MSCP Subarta PM....'. Plan - Hillside Development Policy (Resolution No. 7088) - Provides policy direction in the regulation of hillside development, where the Hillside Modifying District zoning designation is applied. - Grading Ordinance (Ordin..nf'.e No. 7088) - Regulates the grading, excavation and fil1ing of land throughout the City. 6.2 Comnatlble '.sand Uses Within The Preserve The following land uses are considered conditionally compatible with the biological objectives of the MSCP and thus may be allowed within the City's preserveillll~lIIIIi: " ,0>.:::':~« .. ,0;.., . ;,......:-;....',...»: ...... *x~-:> ^' · Passive Recreation · Utility Lines · Roads (in compliance with policies in Section 6.4.2 below) · Trails · Limited Water Facilities (e.g., tran~mi~sion lines, valves, etc.) · Low Density Residential Uses (1ninimum lot area 10 acres) · A . ultu ( . d' turbed nl '_Bliær.ðtr-''rI1~1I gnc re on pnor 15 areas 0 YII:0:;/. ·>:<;,>:;::::~..~,,::;J:::~;L:ú;,::~~~gL:l;~,:~i~) · Grazing (on non-sensitive areas only) Existing uses, public access and recreation, infrastructure and various scientific and biological uses are also allowed within the preserve. Guidelines for each are established below and in Section 6.4 of this Subarea Plan. The intent of these guidelines is to ensure that the biological resources that are preserved are viable over the long term. 6.2.1 Existing Uses 6.1.1.1 Existing uses are permitted by right within the preserve and sbaI1 be allowed to operate as they have historically. However, there sbaI1 be no expansion or change of such uses, or the clearing of additional areas, unless appropriate local, state and federal permits have been first obtained. 6.1.1 Public Access and Recreation 6.1.2.1 Public access and certain passive recreational uses may be permitted within the preserve and/or its linkages. Access points, new trails and facilities, and a public control plan sbaI1 be included in the Subarea Habitat Management Plan. The public control plan sbaI1 empower the preserve manager to close areas to public use, temporarily or peT"'''''''''dy, if such use excessively damages habitat or during breeding season. 6.1.1.1 Provide sufficient slgnage to clearly identify public access to the preserve. Barriers such as vegetation, rocksIboulders or fencing may be necessary to protect highly sensitive .. areas. Use appropriate type of barrier based on location, setting and use. For example, use chain link or cattle wire to direct wildlife movement, and natural rocksIboulders or split rail fencing to direct 48 - ~O- . ----.- --- --- - --.----..---- - - - --. ._--- _._-_. --- City ofChula V"tsID MSCP SuborN IWrfA'f Plan public access away from sensitive areas~ Lands acquired through mitigation may preclude public access in order to satisfy mitigation requirements. .' 6.2.2.3 Locate trai1s, view overlooks and staging areas in tile least sensitive areas of tile preserve or restrict tlleir use. Locate trails along the edges of urban land uses adjacent to the preserve. or the seam between land uses (e.g. agricu1ture/habitat), and follow existing din roads as much as possible rather than entering habitat or wildlüe movement areas. Avoid 1000tÎI18 trai1s between two different habitat types (ecotones) for longer than œœos ry due to the typically beighteDed resource sensitivity in those locations. - 6.2.2.4 In general, avoid paving roads unless management and monitoring evideDce shows otherwise. Clearly demarcate and monitor trails for degradation and off-trail access and use. Provide trail repair/maintenance as needed. Undertake measures to counter the effects of trail erosion including the use of stone or wood cross joints, edge plantings of native grasses, and mulching of the trail. 6.2.2.5 Limit the extent and location of equestrian trails to the less sensitive areas of the preserve. Locate staging areas for equestrian uses at a sufficient distance (e.g. 300-500 feet) from areas with riparian and coastal sage scrub habitats. 6.2.2.6 Remove homeless and itinerant worker camps on habitat areas as soon as found pursuant to existing procedures, 6.2.2.7 Locate roads, trai1s, and other recreational use areas away from sensitive or high value biological areas. 6.2.2.8 Review existing and fulUre access areas to ensure that they do not inhibit biological functions (e.g. breeding, nesting, roosting) and prevent habitat degradation or loss of key sensitive plant species from trampling erosion by controlling access into sensitive biological resource areas. 6.2.2.9 Construct trai1s to any prominent features or viewpoints that are likely to attract hikers, thereby preventing extensive trampling and compaction. . 6.2.3 Public and Private Lands 6.2.3.1 Public lands turned over to the USFWS and/or CDFG and located within the proposed Otay/Sweetwater National Wildlüe Refuge plannn,g area will be managed by tile USFWS or its designee. Privately-beld lands acquired for preservation will be malUlged through a regional ft,ndil18 source, when source is identified and put into place. Where appropriate, biological monitoring and management will be performed by tile Wildlüe Agencies or tlleir designee. . 49 -û- City of Chula VISta MSCP Subarrll "'--;'f Plan 1I1i!\I..l.":lBl---D~.III" 6.2.3.Ja Approximately 2,500 acres of the subarea preserve are expected to remain in private ownership. Development on those private properties within the preserve boundaries reflected on Figure 2 of this Subarea Plan, but not identified as part of a specific private development project ~ IIISlHBeS a 999t 8'lefllll pfeSef'l'eH8ft geil;owever, .¡ty itle~'iB& exclusions (e.g., major 1"'~ infrastructure, etc,) to the reserveg.,tiðã_:, 1k8se 11'II8II itleBfified III reserve 8ft Fi Itft! P .m::«:X:.1~m:;;,,~m»~ ...;;:;.;:::'<=:_..,;x0:;::w......-::::: 'I' 2 are lllSUHled te he 1999t presefvati8ft areas. 'Ate 8'WMfII 8f these I'repel'ties _II hw.'e Ike Fight te feaee anè 'latest their 8\-}ßef8hÏt1 flam RøplSøef8. 11iìI~_.:¡.f"¡lii_ . '';« . .,... "':';'':::=>X:' ':.:i'""':: ,." . ..:::;:; ...=M;.... ..,..... ,...~' ,... ,.....1«-.. IBl1i~ll~j'..YSI¡t{i¡1!~ltlB! .... .,.; . .'. ., "";'''''''X '.;.x., ..;·X{·x-;.:.;·:·,;':·.;':o>.:.;.;.;·:':-:-:....,,_ 6.3 Comnatlble Land Uses Adjacent To The Preserve . 6.3.1 General Criteria Residential uses will most often be located adjacent to the preserve, although commercial/industrial, roads, manufactured open space, parks and recreation areas, utility facilities and other uses will occur in some areas. Manufactured open space (e,g. parks, playing fields, vegetated slope banks, utility rights-of-way, green belts), roads and recreational facilities are presumed cœnpatible land uses adjacent to the preserve. No additional transitional areas~[..III[."__¡"'J are necessary. The following guidelines will be employed when planning and implementing these uses when they are located adjacent to the preserve, These guidelines are inteDded to ensure compatibility and should serve to protect wildlife values in the areas adjacent to the preserve: 6.3.1.1 Plant materials used to landscape manufactured open space, road cuts/fills and recreational facilities should consist of native species appropriate to the adjacent habitat in the preserve. If possible, those species should be based on plants with genetic materials of the area. 6.3.1.2 AIeas and structures subject to beavy hnman use (e.g., ball fields, parking lots, landscapes/playing courts, equestrian centers, staging areas) shall, to the extent feasible, be located away from the edge of the preserve. 6.3.1.3 Lighting within 100 feet of the prcsc:rve edge shall be confIDed to areas necessary to ensure public safety, and shall be limited to low pressure sodium fixtures, shielded and directed away from the preserve where possible. 6.3.1.4 Signage pertaining specifically to the pleserve shaD be limited to that necessary '. to denote public access points, describe allowable uses and activities, and to identify the preserve boundary . SO -/ø)..- ..-...--.- City ofChula Vista MSCP Subal'ta "'-.... Plan 6.3.1.5 Fencing along the preserve boundary is desirable, but not manrtatory, and may provide a barrier to tire, invasive species, and uncontroned human access. Should a landowner or preserve manager decide to instalI fencing, the type, style, and height must coliform to local regulations or those included in the applicable Sectional Plann¡~ Area (SPA) Plan. 6.3.1.6 There will be no requirements for buffers outside the preserve system. All open space requirements for the preserve system will be incorporated into the preserve system and, conversely, all requirements for the development system will be incorporated into the development area. 6.3.2 Project Specific Criteria Each of the development projects discussed in Section 4.0 of this Subarea Plan are regulated by referenced project approvals, including mitigation requirements. ~re guidelines for adjacent land .&¡:i_q¡¡~Di¡_the general requirements above shall apply.~ lilta"._ 6.3.2.1 OtayRanch - Allowable uses for areas adjacent to the preserve are discussed in Policies 7.1-7.3 of the Otay Ranch RMP. The edge of the preserve is defmed as a strip of land 100 ft, wide that surrounds the perimeter of the management preserve. The Subarea Plan Map (See Figure 2) reflects a total of 400 acres of potential active recreation land area within the Otay Valley (per policy 6.2 of the Otay Ranch RMP 1). One 204 acre potential active recreation land area~ located on previously farmed .11 within the river valley. extending weste~ly approximately two miles from the mouth of Salt Creek IIBII ialapproximately SOO ft..± ÌB 1I'iddt g, could create an obstacle to an existing biological connection now experienced between the riparian river bottom and south-facing slopes on the north side of the Otay River Valley without adherence to iiiiiii......!liJl. inRìf'¥ãê!tãÈljaêt~'Bî'"i8^víhev'pN'šeFì~e""E6ëé=gëeiieft ':3. f5~ ^implêlBeBt8tieø gøi4eJiBea v-11 he dIP.'eleped is eeBj1H1etieB wi. I'IARR11\g far the om}- Valley RegieBBl Park Ie aøsøre l'¡alegieal se-R_eM hew.·eeø the ftl'me ft':er lIeØElIB IIBII hBlIHet IIft!IIS lBBated 8B the øeRliem 81epe8 af the w:er '.'tIIley. Prejeet speeHie el'ite1'Ì8 far the )UlI1'9setl Yøi'leRli~ [He Ifee, ellllt af Salt eN. CIIR3'BB, III&Y fellBw; 1te·.1~·.'ert BegetiaâaBB 1M 8ft gsiBg 1f.it:Ii yg~g 8Bd CÐFC far tÀ1- area at tlte pNøeBt âme. . . 51 -t, 3- --..-...-..- . --~----_._-- Îittt~ ~"" " · v" t ;i¡U1Ar" v - vv" I .r;-.....~....................... ·.··5·.·......·..·.·.·.·.1······...·................ g N'" N.. ...... -... -... ..... -... 0'" ... Ii !5 ...................... ........ ·1· '. l' ~. ~ :!: ::¡ ~ .. ¡ - ~ ~ ... ... ;:0 ~ B. It ':/,\{t-i::, .,' ·':Ii': 00 N - ~ '::::::'..:':"'-. .:..... ,.......,:, .. ." . . ............... , \;~~~~~. 1m"" "om !i Ì..!..... ..... ·.·..·.·.·.·....·.1.....·.....·.....;...................... :!: = N - - ~ II. .~ ... ·..Ið!t - - ~ ~f/,... ..tJ I ~ .8'7........... i~~î ~~ ~... - - 2::¡ i h ~ 1 1< ð "='lli - N 1....- ! ~ ~.. .~. ~ ~... 2;; N ~ ~ ~ ~ ,IIi ~! 1].1..._.1.. - - ... ~j n E ! ~ i</ ........... 6~11 ~, ~{IJ I~.·...:..¡ N:!:I>: -...... ~ :S'" III.... ~' 1-< . oS. } 1. '! - - - - ~ .eo = 1 ~,S i ! ð.~...~.... 1 ~ ~, ~~ Eo< ......'....~ ~ ð... . .. "- · - - - - · - " - ." it· f ""'. - 5·"~.-1. :v-v~v v ~ ~ .I. t ..,0 jot. - a~ .u ~~ II z Do . .. ..~.. J. I'. f:..~ ~o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ s~ ~I "'-.. .........8...........................88-08... II. I~~U .........-.................-.....-- "'- 1 l~ ;;..'.> ~~!2S~!S=~~:2:!:!:~..!~~a§ ~ 1}~1 11¡ft .: -N - 00 1. I ;5.a!U","w;~'as; Ii Iii ~ Ill! ! J J _ J :~I~¡I· J & ] I ! ~iU · J J iJII! ðll~ J ~ IJttl · ! ~~ . J: !:2!J: !ss~! I .... .¡..¡ . - 4_ /iìí¡j !Ñ" ~ sa ¡¡ E I IF> ..............~...............'7.... . I .!...' ~...i. ....·~.~.·...·...'.'..I.....'..·..........~.'...............~.."...'."'.'. !::.. ¡¡ - ¡¡ ¡¡ ¡:¡ ! =J...ð>... J t ....!.........~.......>.. ··¡·········.·.·.···.·.···.··.·i·.· ........·.i................... ;~..... GO ... ... - ." - ... GO '" - ... ø... ... I· .......... ..' ·1' ...... ... ... - GO ø -.. ... '" '" - GO ... ""'. . .. ';... - - ø ... - - .. _ ø .»>.·....,>tÕ....: ..; I .................................................. ............................E........................ - ,-<:0::"';;::':':':;;::;: -/:. :-'....- -.:-!Iiìi' ,.... ,..... .... ."........-..- ."-' ...... ., .-.... .....- ...._._-.-,....'..'..... ............. ................................. J .....................................,................ ·.....1·.....·.·..·..·.·.·.·...·.·.,·...·.···.·.·...··..·....·1·.......................~................................... š! g S! ¡:¡ ~ ~ "'!:: = :iii š! J I ·.·····i.· .. ..' ..... i 1 ......... . .. . I ..... ,-. . ...."....' ., .....' " .... .., ...-.. I..·. ......... .................................................................................................................... t d·lii~ ~= - - - " ~. ,1.11/7 °1 t 1................~...................................... ...·..1....··..···..··1. ....................... "'... ...... - - <> "'!2 i II .I. ..... 1. T':::¡~ ¡:¡ -- ð t. '11 ')' . i j ..: ..; ,.. ~ ...... ~ ............ ..E. ...... 011 11 Ë :i, ...................... '.>... ..... - ..." ø - .. GO GO: "'.. "11 [ <"' IUI1~1'" ~ -~ - '" ... ~ ~~ h I.! ¡ .~...i· 8~ I: ~. ~ rI'J ..Ii I.J. .... .... i1!.. ......._........... ð; .. :!:;;: -...." ~ :8 s:! II i IS 1 . . E oCi5..BII¡ol. - - - - ¡:: .!oJ. Ji~ s ~r~·t,J7. ].1 ~~ ~ po. ·.···.·.[.·....1 g 1.J...............ð.......................................... ...................................................... ... - <> - - - - ... - ... - ..... - I.. J -'. '7'. ·1' '. f! -- gg v - v 2: v v ::¡::¡ .I t . I..· ~~I! - ~! ') .................... ·1 ~ j II J i ~ ..... ~.I..B§ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~i ¡ :!!:z$¡;;:s:¡t;;:aIl ;;:!::IiI~8~-~8... s.' \~â - - . 1 j: r....... ~..:..- ..:--." - - ~'" ~ 11 it '.. r - - tl! ... ~ i i !HHi!U :e ¡ ~ gg ~ ~ GO E i ~ fH! is , I· II'. i oñ..; oñ ..: "¡..; I tl ¡ - -." 1·..1 I .¡ . .dlh ! ~ ~~8 .. !!Ic' !ššM J ..:..; ...;.. wi ':: City of Chulo Vista MSCP Subarea lWH"'f Plan 6.4 General Plann;n [ and Desil!ll Guld..lines 6.4.1 Infrastructure 6.4.1.1 Certain public infrastructure necessary for public health and safety is permitted within the preserve system. Any impact to habitat, sensiûve species or listed species sba1l be considered to be a "take" and will require appropriate mitigaûon. It is expressly intended that flexibility be allowed in locarlng planned infrastructure within the preserve. It is also recognized that it may be necessary to locate public faciliûes in the preserve that are not currently anrlcipated. Mitigation for the impacts of new facilities is included in Secûon 7.2.4. Such faciliûes could include the following: · Electric Distribution Faciliûes · Roads · Waterlines and reservoirs and associated faciliûes (e.g., pump stations, pressure control facilities, and access roads), and water storage and treatment facilities · Sewer lines and pump staûons · Telephone, cable televisions and natural gas faciliûes · Stonn drain and flood control faciliûes, including associated detenûon/retenûon basins and dissipator structures ' Mitigaûon for those public improvement projects which disturb habitat within the MHP A shall be directed within preserve boundaries. 6.4.1.2 Current maintenance and operaûon acûviûes for public infrastructure sba1l be allowed, including access road maintenance, cIearing/desilrlng of flood/drainage control faciliûes and those activiûes which require the maintenance of cleared areas. 6.4.1.3 Maintenance and operaûon of new facilities shall be allowed in accordance with standard practices exisrlng at the ÛIDe of compleûon, including access road maintenance and those which require the clearing of certain areas. 6.4.1.4 To the extent feasible, sensiûve habitats and species sba1l be avoided during the pl~nning, designing and construcûon of new infrastructure and access roads. The physical and engineering requirements of the infrastructure sba1l be considered during the sirlng procedure. Impacts sba1l be mitigated as indicated on Table 3 of this Subarea Plan. Areas temporarily disturbed shall be revegetated. 6.4.1.5 Emergency repairs to infrastructure are permitted. The affected agency will be allowed to enter the preserve and complete neœssary repairs consistent with normal practices. No additional permits or permissions sba1l be required. However, when emergency repairs are necessary, efforts to avoid and minimi7.e impacts to the extent practicable sba1l be made. Areas disturbed by such repairs sba1l be revegetated with native plant materials appropriate to the habitat that was distUrbed, and monitoring sba1l meet success criteria in the Preserve Management Plan(s). 54 - 6>t - -- - ----- city ofChula VIStD MSCP Subøreo lIOf...y PIon 6.4.2 Roads 6.4.2.1 Roads in the preserve areas are limited to those identified in the Circulation Element, collector streets essential for area circu1ation and existing maintenance roads. Local streets shall not cross the preserve except where needed to access isolated development areas. 6.4.2.2 Development of roads in canyon bottoms shall be avoided. Where roads enter and traverse portions of the preserve, provisions shall be taken to provide for wildlife management, such as adequate fencing to direct wildlife movement and undercrossings (preferably bridges). 6.4.2.3 Roads within the preserve shall be narrowed from existing design standards to minimi7e habitat fragmentation and disruption of wildlife movement and breeding areas. Roads shall be located in lower quality habitat or disturbed areas to the extent possible. 6.4.2.4 Preserve access points and mAinteœnce roads, where they cross the preserve, shall be gated and signed to control public access. . 6.4.2.5 State Route 125 is exempt from the requirements of the Chula Vista Subarea Plan .. . f.fmmtðd_""'.&r~ b the WildlW beca t 11 be ed d' w, ',' , " " ','" , a' "" '" " "'" use 1 WI revIew an :::.,:,:,:::::;:::::.Ù~,;,,~jl~~::,:,.~:::::;:,~:,:k.....~;;";.:::::,:.;,~.)lilt:.-, ~h:::~~Jk:::::.~::::::;;:::^~:::X::::,~ y e Agencies through tHeparate processl. 6.4.3 Fire and Brush Management Residential and commercial uses may not be compatible with the preserve and will be separated from the preserve by a brush management zone which shall vary in width. In some, cases, the brush management area will be within the preserve to: protect adjacent uses from fires as well as reducing the possibility if catastrophic wildfires that could destroy much of the subarea preserve. 55 -if1- u____n_.m_ ---- City of Chu/o Vtsta MSCP Subarea JINr..... PIon The fife lBIIBIIgemeBt "laB sBeII he a eem"aBeBt af the Pregef'\'e MlIIIIIgemeBt PIIIB wlliek 811&II he ,pep8:f8å v:HbiB 8M j"8&f af the 8iW:~g af the l'-rlemeBtaisø ."4£eeæeat fl.A.). 6.4.4 Fencing, Lighting And Signage 6.4.4.1' Fencing, lighting and signage arc permitted in the blUSh management zone. 6.4.4.2 Lighting shall be confined to areas neœssary to ensure public safety, and shall be limited to low pressure sodium fixtures. 6.4.4.3 Signage shall be limited to that neœsssry to denote public access points, prohibit trespassing on private property and to call out the preserve boundary. 6.4.5 Materials Storage No storage of materials (e.g. chemicals, equipment, etc.) will be allowed within the preserve or in any areas that may impact the preserve, especially due to leakage, drainage or flood flows. 6.4.6 Mining, Extraction And Processing Faclllties 6.4.6.l In the long-term, it is envisioned that no sand or other mining activities will occur in the preserve except on an interim basis, if determined necessary to maintain ponds, existing flood control channels, or remove excess sediments from strategic floodplain locations if the sediments present a problem to sensitive areas or to management of the preserve. Processing and other related mining activities (e.g., asphaltic processing, etc.) arc incompatible with the MSCP preserve. 6.4.6.2 All temporary sand mining and related activities, as indicated in Section 6.4.6.1 above, must be consistent with the objectives, guidelines, and recommendations in the MSCP Plan, the City ofChula Vista's ordinances, all relevant long-range plans, as well as with the State Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975. 6.4.6.3 Any sand removal activities shall be monitored for noise impacts to surrounding sensitive habitats, and all new sediment removal or mining operations proposed in proximity to the preserve, or changes in existing operations, must include noise reduction methods that take into consideration the breeding and nesting seasons of sensitive bird species. 6.4.6.4 All existing and future mined lands adjacent to or within the preserve shall be reclaimed pursuant to SMARA and should be designed to contribute biologically to the preserve. Native habitats shall be restored as much as possible. Although man-made ponds are technically not native to the region, where these provide nativc wildlife and wetland habitats, they are considered compau'ble uses where they do not interfere with other 1~ natural processes and wildlife movement. . 56 -tf,! - City of Chula VISta MSCP Subarra Awl"" Plan 6.4.6.5 Any permitted activity iDcluding reclamation of sand mining sball consider changes and impacts to water quality, water table level, fluvial hydrology, flooding, and wetlands and habitats upstream and downstream and provide adequate mitigation. . 6.4.7 Flood Control 6.4.7.1 Flood control should generally be limited to existing agreements with the Wildlife Agencies unless demonstrated to be needed based on a cost benefit analysis and pursuant to a restoration plan. Floodplains within the preserve, and upstream from the preserve if feasible, should remain in a natural condition and configuration in order to allow for the ecological, geological, hydrological, and other natural processes to remain or be restored. 6.4.7.2 No berming, channelization, or man-made constraints or baniers to creek, tributary, or river flows shall be allowed in any floodplain within the preserve upless reviewed by all appropriate agencies, and adequately mitigated. Review must include impacts to upstream and downstream habitats, flood flow volumes, velocities and configurations, water availability and changes to the water table level. 6.4.7.3 No riprap, concrete, or other unnatural material sball be used to stabilize river, creek, tributary, and channel banks within the preserve. All river, stream, and channel banks shall be natural, and stabilized with willows and other appropriate native plantil1gS. 6.4.8 Scientific And Biological Activities 6.4.8.1 All scientific, research, monitoring and habitat restoration and enha1V'.ement activities are permitted within the City of Chula Vista portion of the preserve, subject to approval by the preserve manager/landowner and obtJIinil1g any necessary permits. 6.4.8.2 Any of the activities indiC lted in Section 6,4.8.1 above shall be carried out under a regional program implemented by the resource agencies, City of Chula Vista or preserve manager, and are not required elements of the Subarea Plan. The Wildlife Agencies are currently preparing a Biological Monitoring Plan. 6.4.8.3 Pftar te tlegiBBiBg &BY af the Btla'.'e BeWliâeS, the emity ,eFfal'lBiBg the wark shllll _eømify the uøteflyiBg IBBdsWMr BgBiRst &BY r-" all _aIlS 1hat e_1I arise eat af die BlIl'rsvell aeti-vftieo. 6.5 Specific PrcI.ect Exclusions 6.5.1 Otay Ranch '. 6.5.1.1 Permitted Uses. Section S.8 of the RMP indicates that: "the primary goal of the RMP is to provide opportunities for passive recreation within the Preserve that are consistent with S7 -~r- ".~-- City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea 1IIw,r:¡'f Plan resource protection. In addition, 400 acres within the Preserve are available for "active recreational uses· (within the Otay River Valley, pg. 195). With respect to agricultural uses, the RMP states (Section 5.9, pg. 195): "Establishmcntofthe Preserve will provide opportunities for creation of demonstration agricultural uses within the Preserve. The area in the vicinity of Bird Ranch bas been identified as an area suitable for demonstration agriculture. Demonstration agricultural activities must be compatible with RMP policies and standards for resource protection and enhancement. " Revegetation of Preserve Lands. The RMP includes requirements for revegetation of certain disturbed areas to be included in the Preserve; an Appendix in the RMP discusses conceptual revegetation plans. Permitted uses within the preserve are discussed on page 103 of the RMP; they include an .interpretive center(s), native plant nursery and/or botanical garden, active recreation not greater than 400 acres, a system of trails, motorized vehicles necessary for preserve management and emergency services, limited fire roads, and ecologically necessary controlled burning. Objective 8 of the RMP (pgs. 116-117) indicates interim uses and activities that may continue within the proposed preserve until conveyance to the Preserve OwnerlManager. The following specific preserve exclusions are identified for Otay Ranch: - The proposed alignment for SR 125 from Otay Mesa through Otay Ranch along the preferred alignment is excluded ftom the Preserve area, as is the alignment for Alta Road along a near parallel alignment to the east. The specific alignment will depend on the fmal CalTrans and the Wildlife Agencies review and permit process. - The fmal configuration of the proposed Limited Development Area will depend on future detailed resource studies, although the minimum number of acres is fixed. These areas are to be excluded from the preserve area. - The Otay Ranch RMP (Pg. P-3, #3) contains a partial list of facilities as follows: SR 125, California Water Authority (CW A) aqueduct casements, utility casements, the Otay Valley trunk sewer, the proposed Salt Creek trunk sewer, and others (at this time, it is not known which of these potential facilities would impact the preserve area). Refer to the draft (RMP U) for specific facilities. - Other planned roadways that cross the preserve including: Rock Mountain Road, Otay Valley Road, Otay Lakes Road (east of the proposed Resort site), Millar Ranch Road in Proctor Valley and the future widening of Proctor Valley Road through Proctor Valley. S8 -1ð- City of Chulo V"tStD MSCP Subarea JIrw'''-,'f PIon 6.5.2 Otay Valley Regional Park Plan A conceptual plan considered by the JEP A Policy Committee for the park pI'C!liminarily identifies a number of recreational facilities as iDdicated in Section 4.3.2.3. It is not known exactly where these recreational facilities will be placed, but the draft EIR for the MSCP describes Policy 6.2 of the Otay Ranch RMP, relative to the recreational area. In addition to the potential recreational facilities, other facilities listed below may occur within the river park boundary (these exclusions are in addition to the preserve exclusions listed above). - City of San Diego Clean Water Program reclamation facility (located in the western end of the Otay Ranch, within the river valley (see Leuieri-MclntyIe, 1994). - Proposed roads crossing the river: a) Pasco Ranchero; b) La Media Road; c) State Route 125; and d) Alta Road. - Other local roads and trails within the park for local access. - Existing rock quarry (approx. 135 acres) on Rock Mountain, just east of Otay Valley Road; the quarry operation is expected to continue for about the next 50 years, after which the site may be used for active recreation. - The Gun ClublBird Ranch: This area and the area immediately east (about 225 acres) has been a gun club and ranch and would not be used for habitat management puIPOses under the conceptual park plan. - The site for the 400 acres of active recreation in Otay Ranch has been identified for the beDch areas on both sides of the Otay River. - Lower Otay County Park (approx, 70 acres): an existing, but closed campground; to be refurbished. - The existing County Air Park, located east of Otay Reservoir, south of Otay Lakes Road (not in Subarea Plan): used as a landing field aud observation area for gliders aud parachutists (approx. 60 acres) - The Conceptual Park plan also includes the George F. Bailey Detention facility and the 120 acre mitigation/open space area located to the north of the facility (not in Subarea Plan). 6.5.3 Salt Creek Ranch Three future two-lane residential roadways servicing resid...mal estate tÍeighborhoods in eastern Salt . Creek Ranch. '9 -1/- ---_._.~-_._-_.- - . City of Chula Vrsta MSCP Subartll 11M"".. Plan 6.5.4 Sunbow n The future extension of East Orange Avenue from the west end of the Sunbow n property. east to the boundary of the Otay Ranch. 7.0 PREsERVE MANAGEMENT .' 7.1 Plan PreDaration A Preserve Mana ement Plan shaIl be leted _.iIIiI! within one ear after si . of an g camp ~"","U ...... . y gnmg Implementation Agreement, Management entities may differ ~ on ownership (responsibility for management falls on fee-owner or easement holder of preserve land) and whether overall maintenance and operations is contracted to a single management organization for the overall Subarea Plan. 7.2 Protection Of Resources 7.2.1 Interim Protection Interim protection is provided through those standards, ordinances and policies listed in Section IV of this Subarea Plan. The City agrees to make changes necessitated by the approval of the Subarea Plan, including Interim Protection and General Plan amendments. if required, within one year after adoption of the Implementing Agreement (IA) by City Council. The lA, as discussed in Section 6.2 of the MSCP, is the instrument by which interim protection is assured. 7 .2.2 Agricultura1IBi1~"P~em tieB .w'ú.'w..,.... p For agricultura1land users, a primary objective of the agriculture provision of the Chula Vista Subarea Plan is to encourage voluntary habitat restoration or enh"n~ent activities. ..J!1~ N¡jfesêiìië¡rîìKì aWiàiidôWIîèr who enters' intÒ a cOOPëïBtivc agrèement With the Wildlife Agencies will be given a "safe harbor" from any additional future liability under the ESA or CESA beyond thai existing at the time the agreement is signed. Ar. long as landowners carry out the agreed-upon habitat improvements and avoid impacts to listed species and their habitat which exist at the time they enter into the program, they may farm, develop or make any other lawful use of the property, even if such use incidentally results in the loss of listed species. 60 - 7,), - City of Chula Vrsto MSCP Subarrø JlNøAIf PIon The intent of the safe harbor provision is to allow agriculturaIlandowners to carry out measures which would benefit the land in general, such as øe_g im'9VII¡ mlBtli fer l1elšÌIIg water iB tleeš,I-:--, contour grading, or allowing land to go fallow, with the result being the regrowth of native vegetation and return of native species, and not have those good land stewardship efforts lead to potential conflicts with ESA and CESA prohibitions on Take of listed species. 7.2.3 Permanent Protec:tion Permanent protection of preserved land is to be provided through recordation of conservation easements senior to other encumbrances upon the fee title or dedication of the fee title itself, as appropriate and consistent with the needs of the landowners conveying the property to the preserve. Both public and private landowners may wish to retain compadble uses of the property while complying with preserve. management guidelines. This is accommodated with the grant of easement. 7.2.4 Mitigation Plan .. 7.2.4.1 Midgation For Covered Projects Within Or Adjacent To Preserve Boundary £øI!lINiaPÎ8Ii. ., In some cases, ' those projëCïS witl bäve fully mitigated their biological impacts through onsite dedications of property or conveyances of conservation easements. In other cases, the mitigwon for those projects wül be directed to available~ qualified lands within the boundaries of the Subarea. The City will attempt to ~ these available mitigation lands to those affected developments, m........,... thereby further enhancing preserve acquisition and successful preserve implementation. 7.2.4.2 Mitigation For Other Permitted Uses Other penIrltted uses include those projects not covered under Section 7.2.4.1 above and II consttucûon of public and private infrastructure, as described in Sections 6.4.1 and 6.4.2 (Infrastructure and Roads). Mitigation for such uses will be in accordaDce with the guidelines set forth on Table 3, herein. . 61 - 73- ...- - ~._...._._.~._- City of Chula Vista MSCP Subaml lWf'A'I Plan TABLE 3 UPLANDS MITIGATION GUIDELlNESt 1ter Habitat Type Locatioa LocatlOD or Pre_doD I MitlpdoD Rados or IIDpac:t IDlld. Preaerve Outalde Preaerve TIER I: R8.fãa.l ~q¡dIife CaRihla, IDside 2:1 3:,1 (rare Southem Foreduaes Preserve uplaDds) TaRey Pia.s Ferllt Coastal Bluff Scrub Maritime Suc:cu1ent Scrub Outside 1:1 2:1 )(8Ätim.. OaapaR'al Preserve Native Grasslands Oak Woodlands TIER D: Coastal Sage Scrub IDside 0, 1.5:1 2:1 (uncommon CSS/Chaparral Preserve uplands) Outside 1:1 1.5:1 Preserve TIER m: Mixed Chaparral IDside 1:1 1.5:1 (common Chamise Chaparral Preserve uplands) Non-native Grassland IP-W Outside 0.5:1 Preserve (Tr,' .... .,.) Out_d. W 0, W Pr8SIFI"' (w.<t .... ....) TIER IV: Disturbed Lands IDJide No MitlptlOD No MitlptlOD (other Agricultural Lands Preserve 1teq1dnd 1teq1dnd uplands) Eucalyptus Outside No MitlptlOD No Mitlpdon Preserve 1teqalred 1teqalred ~ .....Id.·: Within covered projects located within or adjacent to preserve area. ·Outalde·: Outside of bouadaries of Chula Vista Subarea Plan preserve. "Pre..rve": Area of MHPA included in the Chula Vista Subarea Plan preserve. 1. One example of how Table 3 might be applied would be .. follows: U a .¡~'¡''tM.1y 1M1..11 ,_rlllf _II were to propose deve10pmeJlt which impacted llensitive habitat within tbe Subarea Plan bouadaries, but outside of the Preserve bouadary, then mitigation would be required to occur lPiif~§.illiBtdi_~.iIIa.r~':·"'':- ä. Pr,..~,. 81' 811t... 11I0 51*&1". 1tIa. hY.II.;;'~uih'.tiUdU;~f·iIi:kiDcF~dm t Mitigation ratio. identified' in the table above . '", . .. _~ø!!~£~;=~~':-::r :.::~:,:f~~ the Cty'. Preserve t!!t 62 - 7t.f-- City of Chulo Vista MSCP Subarea JIIw"".. PIon 8.0 FuNDING Land within the preserve that remains in private ownership will be mAintJoi""'" in its current state (unless approved plans dictate otherwise) and all costs to do so will be borne by the existing and any subsequent owners. Land that is dedicated and ownership vested with a government entity or private conservancy shall be JIUIintained in its existing state and all costs to do so will be borne by the new public or private owner/conservancy. A regional funding source will help fund the costs of those areas not acquired through exactions, as discussed in the MSCP. Land that is revegetated shall be monitored and maintained for the period of time specified in the approving documentation by the entity responsible for the revegatation. Upon completion of such activities in accordance with applicable permits, the land may be retained in private ownership with an agreed upon open space or conservation easement, or transfened to an acceptabie government entity or private conservancy. IJIThøt owner shall mAintain the land in the state in which it is receivedi .!It'i.;.i~il;;i*g\''i and shall bear all costs to do SO unless other arrangements are made with the previous landowner. The City of Chula Vista commits to adopting a general funding plan consistent with principles established in the MSCP Plan and acceptable to the City within six months of signing an Implementation Agreement. 9.0 SUBAREA PLAN AMENDMENTS The Subarea Plan includes lands on which the location of preservation and development areas were not resolved (amendment areas) and therefore take authorizations do not apply. However, a process for resolving project design and mitigation issues has been developed that would allow for the properties within the amendment areas to be covered by the Subarea Plan take authorizations in the future. Two types of amendments, minor amendments and minor amendments, will be used to extend take to the amendment areas. The amendment process would only be initiated at the request of the property owner, 9.1 Minor Amendments Minor amendment properties are properties on which habitat could be partially or completely eliminated (with appropriate mitigation) without significantly affecting the overall goals of the City's Subarea Plan, MSCP and associated enviromnental documents. Minor amendment properties would be expected to meet the criteria and achieve the goals for linkages and conidors as described in the Section 2.2 of the MSCP and provide mitigation consistent with those provisions conta;""'" in Table 3 herein. Minor amendments would require the approval of the USFWS's Field Office ~ and the CDFG's NCCP Program Manager. '- 63 . - 7·f-- - --, - - - City ofChula VISta MSCP Subarra Pm"".. Plan It is intended that parcels ipdicated on the Subarea Plan Map (See Figure 2) as "Minor Amendment ¡¡&l~:~~ !!!!J!:~~~t!'~!!!!'!!!!~~!~!1~ be included in the Implementaûon Agreement. In all cases, the land may only be added to the Subarea Plan with the consent or request of the land owner. 'Ate øequeøee sf 8Ø118æsø eeøltI iøelatle IÐ''''8~,'øef's Beeertaøn af èe pravísi8Ø6 sf èe 8a ,IIMB Pie, ~Jrevision of the Chula Vista Subarea Plan to reflect 1i_¡_JII~B8Ø118lU1âaø ra'.'III ,. lIIe City CÕ'·--'tI --~ " . . :<:::':'::;::::'::'';':,~::~':»:,,::;:::::;:~::::::::;:::::;~::X:~:N::;'';::Ø':::'~:;::,-::.-.,:,:,:»::~:<::;:$":-'m t 11'1" t transmi+ to the Wildlife Agencies for appropriate acûon, '.2 MJÿor Amendments Requests for major amendments to the City's Subarea Plan's take authorizaûons would be processed by the Wildlife Agencies consistent with applicable laws and regulations (including the National Environmental Policy Act and the California Environmental Quality Act) in effect at the time the request _ii_.y;¡¡"_lll(~_I.llr_~¡1 ~1' 64 - 1£"':" City of Chu/a V"tsto MSCP Suboroo IWHAw Plan 10.0 REFERENCES [To be completed] .' . 6S - 11- --.-- ____.m_ _ _ ___...__~_._____ .___<.._. ......----- - - ., -- - - City afChuta VISta MSCP Subarta JIM..... Plan 11.0 APPENDIX 11.1 Baldwin Tentative Agreement Exhibits 11.2 Implementation Agreement/Management Authorization 11.3 Draft Otay Valley Regional Park Concept Plan Diagram 11.4 Vegetation Communities Within the Preserve by MlÛor Project . 66 - 7f- - City of Chulo VISta MSCP Subarea JIM""., PIon 11.1- BALDWIN TENTATIVE AGREEMENT EXHIBITS --., . . - -19- .-"--. ---..-....- - - 'I¡;\.~ I BALDWINTENTATlVE AGREEME~ - ExiDBIT 1 I - . ... - '- . - <¡tJ - ..,_.... _n--- , ",!~."~" -.---..- --.. - Ñ . t: I I lJ j I . ~ , . . ~ . . .~.~ .. .. Co .. -- ~ 0 . - . ~ .. ~ I ........."..,.. -. < Î' ~ = - 7'1- ~ ~)l~~f~ ~!~ ~1.~·iiL ·'tt.~~··l~ì~' . . :,. ,. ," " " /' ,j...~ ' ,,»! ,. .,\" .' '. ' . { , , . . ..;0. .!iiit1.....;.. .....~ì.... """ I ....1:... J...:.~ ';'~ ~¡L: . . ~ L...:.~; :'}..': I BALDWIN TENTATIVE AGREEMENT - ExtdRlT 3 t \ 'U·~ . . . . - Very Low Density -9'~ L b Density Relic - ...-..~. - . . ~.~.. ~~~ VILLAGE 5 J' ~."."..:'::..~ .. '" .";1 ';.t:f. ~ "..:' . ... ~ I BALDWIN TENTATIVE AGREEMENT - ExIIIBIr 4 I~ / ~~ . '-/~ V l.--'-K ~ -.,p. ...- ~' , . '. . '. .:. , 41' . '0\Ji\t CO' . .)h - l:::~-i - . . .20 -.---'-¡¡¡1I1ijb-- --._~~ ........ . -w---- 01 ... ~ . . ....... : L· ,.." ....... · . · . · . · . · .."11.... · · -Jì3 - \,' _u_ ~.._-_..- .., ..~ ~,...·--__"-,....:v ::"'--"")'___ --u ¡¡ - -':,'/. ~,.¿':tt, ~ '\'r ...., ~~' ,..Ù ....~ ~ ~ ~,__,\' .. _" ".~"'~ - ',I "~ <~ I BALDWIN TENTATIVE AGREEMENT - E~HIKIT 5 - , S' " ~~~ _.~ 0'" . \~, './.ç:::/ '\-;;.- ,'., \ \,."", 'V ' t ..I --I !I "I ..I _I IT ø ø VILt .. , ( -.Pr- , . . City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Preserve Plan 11.2 - IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENTIMANAGEMENT AUTHORIZATION (NOT INCLUDED AT TIßS TIME) - i'.:s-- - City of Chu/a Vista MSCP Subarea Preserve Plan 11.3 - DRAFT OTAY VALLEY REGIONAL PARK CONCEPT PLAN DIAGRAM -~b _ .. - el . . II: .!I A. . 1å. 21 II: .. U ~ · I I: .- I I I E .- - II II ! f- A. . ~ I II I I · A. 8BD~~ - · II: D .- ---~ CD lit II III a: þo lit - - · I I I I I =- þo J! I · I . = : I... I I , ... . . .. : . . . . . . . . _:.. -<61- -~.- --- ~.._-_..~...- - -~_.- City of Chula VISta MSCP Subarttl PNr'A" Plan 11.4 - VEGETATION COMMUNlTIES WITHIN THE PREsERVE BY MAJOR. PROJECT . - f~- §~l J ' c:!¡ § {, II I) ~ ! i ê . = 1 .. .. ~ ~ E . 'Ii! ~ -ëi, :i.a -e; æ; !ð- .... ~ 1i ~ ...~ t. .... ~8. r8! {, ¡ III" {, f ~ !J ·...0 .. .' j~ ... 11 I {, I~J , ';~ J1 J II J :E .. .. J ,I ~J ~ ]111 I " f J¡ ~ JJ~11J!! III JIIJJiliiliiliill;¡ ! - £Cl..... . . . ._,~-----_......__._---_.,--- -~..- ~J I J ! ~ § II I) {,, ! . i = j ~i :Ë,a ~l ;;5- !J {,, I {,, ~j i~ ... 11 {,, I~J .. J 1 J II I :I I A il ~ 1 ]j1! I i J J~IIJ¡~~Ji j11 t J JJIJJIJiiJi!lill~~¡ ! i - C¡ð -- - COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 02/ Q....- Meeting Date 7/16/96 ITEM TITLE: Resolution /fJ'J7J Supporting HUD Funding for Non-Profit Housing Acquisitions SUBMITTED BY: Legislative Committee (4/5ths Vote: Yes_ NoX) RECOMMENDATION: The Legislative Committee recommends approval of the resolution. DISCUSSION The item proposed for Council action is follows; 1. California Housing Partnership: HUD FUNDING FOR NON-PROFIT HOUSING ACOUISITIONS Would request that Congress take action to prevent the loss of affordable housing units by including sufficient funds in the 1996-97 budget to support the acquisition of at-risk units by non-profit agencies. Fiscal Impact: No direct fiscal impact on the City. However, if the funds are not allocated, there is potential for 22% of the City's affordable housing stock (originally financed by HUD) to increase to market rate rents. This conversion, via early payoff of HUD loans, would create a financial hardship for nearly 100 Chula Vista families which depend on that housing affordability. South Bay Community Services has submitted an application to HUD for the $5 million in capital grant funding necessary to purchase the subject properties and keep those housing units affordable. Legislative Committee Recommendation: SUPPORT The Legislative Program is supportive of creative federal financing of low-income housing. This support, however, is subject to fonnal Council action based on the specifics of each proposal (Section n.D.1.a.). c:lwp51\memoslcc0716,113 .__u. ____....__. THIS PACE BLANK ol/4,';L RESOLUTION NO. /dYJ73 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING HUD FUNDING FOR NON- PROFIT HOUSING ACQUISITIONS WHEREAS, the federal government provided private developers with low-interest loans and rent subsidies administered by HUD to promote housing affordability; and WHEREAS, these loan agreements provided owners with "bailout" clauses to allow such owners to cease participation after 20 years by paying off their mortgages; and WHEREAS, this would permit owners to sell the buildings and would result in a loss of affordable housing inventory; and WHEREAS, non-profit agencies would like to buy such buildings in order to avoid the loss of affordable housing but will need HUD funding; and WHEREAS, in 1995/96, only $700 million was allocated to this program; and WHEREAS, no funding is being proposed by the HUD/VA subcommittee at this committee; and WHEREAS, as of April of this year, HUD estimates some $3 billion will be needed to meet such funding requests; and WHEREAS, the California Housing Partnership is asking all local government agencies to pass resolutions of support for funding to cover the anticipated sales of affordable houses stock, originally financed by HUD nationwide; and WHEREAS, support for this funding is recommended based on the benefit to area low-income families; and WHEREAS, the Legislative Program is supportive of such creative federal or state funding for low-income housing, but reserves such issues for direct Council action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby request that Congress take action to prevent the loss of affordable housing units by including sufficient funds in the 1996-97 budget to support the acquisition of "at risk" units by non-profit agencies. Presented by Approved as to form by ~"'J111-<.~ç Shirley Horton, Mayor Ann Y. Moore, Interim City Attorney C:\rs\funding.hud c2/a.. -3 , CITY OF CHULA VISTA LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS July 11, 1996, BILL AUTHOR TITLE INTRODUCED AMENDED - California Housing HUD Funding for Non-Profit N/A - Partnership Housing Acquisitions CITY POSITION LEAGUE POSITION RELATED BILLS ADDRESSEO BY LEG. PROGRAM PENDING NONE NONE Yes; Section II.D.1.a. (Council action raquired) STATUS: House Appropriations Committee (96/97 budget deliberations) BACKGROUND: In the mid to late 1960's the federal government provided private developers with low-interest loans and rent subsidies administered by HUD and Farmers Home Administration to promote housing afford ability. Owners who secured these subsidies entered into contracts with HUD, agreeing to build or operate multifamily rental housing which reserved the units at restricted rents for lower income households. These agreements were planned as 40 year commitments, however a "bailout" clause was included to allow owners to cease participation after 20 years by paying off their mortgages. This would permit them to sell the buildings, or convert them to market rate housing. In some instances, tenants of these buildings will qualify for section 8 subsidies to protect them from rent increases for no more than one year. In the City of Chula Vista, there are 4 davelopments which have been built and operated under this federal program. Two of these, comprising 300 units of low income housing, have been sold to non- profit organizations and financed through HUD Capital Grant funds. The remaining 86 units (Castle Park Garden Apartments at 727 Kennedy Street with 62 units and Rancho Vista Apartments at 1419 Tobias Drive with 24 units) have now passed their 20-year anniversaries and the owners wish to sell and/or convert them to market-rate units. This represents a potential loss of 22% of the City's affordable housing inventory. At Castle Gardens 50 of the 62 units are reserved for very low income families, those which earn 50% less than the median income for San Diego County. For a family of 4, this reflects approximately $21,000 per year. The remainder of the Castle Park Garden units are reserved for low income families; those which earn between 50 to 80% of the median income for this region. Rancho Vista Apartments reserves 16 of its 24 units for very low income families, with the remainder set aside for low income families. South Bay Community Services would like to acquire these units in order to avoid having them convert to market rate housing, but will need HUD funding of $5,004,B01 in order to do so. As of June 14, 1995, SBCS had submitted Plans of Action to HUD as an application for Capital Grant funding to implement the acquisition, however they face stiff national competition for these scarce dollars. Council Resolution Request that Congress take action to prevent the loss of affordable housing units by including would: sufficient funds in the 1996-97 budget to support the acquisition of at-risk units by non-profit agencies. The California Housing Partnership is asking all local government agencies to pass resolutions of support for enough funding to cover the anticipated sales nationwide. In 1995/96, only $700 million dollars was ailocated to this program. No funding at all is being proposed by the HUDNA subcommittee at this time. As of April of this year, HUD estimated some $3 billion will be needed to e2/¿¿ -f ----..-..-.-------.-----..--,--.--...- UgisI8tiva Ano/ysis .July 11.1996 "'2 meet all of the anticipated funding requests. Support for this funding is recommended based on the benefit to area low-income families. The Legislative Program is supportive of such creative federal or state funding for low-income housing, but reserves such issues for direct Council action. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct impact, however the loss of 22% of the City's affordable housing stock would create a financial hardship for nearly 100 Chula Vista families. Under the guidelines of ·Iow· and ·very low· income levels, current rates for these units are $308- $400/month (depending on the number of bedrooms). It is estimated by South Bay Community Services that the market rate for these same units would raise the monthly rental to between $600 and $800 per month (again, depending on the number of bedrooms), well beyond the reach of those who now live in these developments. DATE TO COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION LETTERS July 16, 1996 SUPPORT YES C:\wp51 \ANAL YSES\HUD$.ana e2/~ - ~