Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1977/10/06 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Thursday October 6, 1977 A regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chu1a Vista, California was held on the above date, beginning at 7:00 P. M., in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, with the following: MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Hyde, Members Scott, Cox, Hobel Members Absent: Member Egdah1 STAFF PRESENT: Executive Director Cole, Special Counsel Reed, City Attorney Lindberg, Community Development Coordinator Boyd, Director of Public Works Robens ITEM NO. 1 - APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Member Cox and unanimously carried by those present to approve the minutes of September 1, 1977, copies having been sent to each member. Chairman Hyde stated that a preliminary report on a meeting held with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service would be given at this time. Community Development Coordinator Boyd reported that a meeting had been held on Wednes- day, October 5, 1977, with the following staff members in attendance: Doug Boyd and Joe Sanseverino from Community Development; Shale Hansen, Roger Daoust and Bill Robens from Public Works, and Norm Williams from Planning. Other agencies represented were: Bruce Eliason, California Department of Fish and Game; Jim Slawson, National Marine Fisheries Service; Dale Pierce and Glenn Emigh, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wayne White, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and Bill Foley, Westec Services, Inc. At this meeting specific portions of the Bayfront area were identified as a proposed critical habitat for the light footed clapper rail under the Endangered Species Act. The information on the proposed critical habitat is published in the Federal Register 60 days to allow time for response from agencies involved. During that time, Chu1a Vista will have an opportunity to speak on the matter. Actual limits are defined into law after 60 days. A Recovery Team made up of scientists has inspected the area and made this proposal. However, the City and other agencies involved were not con- tacted until after this inspection and proposal were made. The area involves roughly about 2/3rds of the Bayfront Redevelopment area and affects the City of National City, the Army Corps of Engineers (Sweetwater Channel), Department of Transportation (1-5/54 Interchange), Ca1trans and the Federal Highway Administration. It was pointed out by Director of Public Works Robens that, though we have had no experience with this agency, it is understood that they are required to go through an official consultation process with the State before officially identifying critical habitats and that process has not yet occurred. At this point, nothing has been received in writing from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, nor has a map been submitted showing the proposed area of the critical habitat. The Members and staff were concerned about the consequences to the procedures we have completed for acceptance of the Bayfront Plan by the Coastal Commission and whether the Redevelopment Agency could proceed with plans that have already been made. It was concluded that the Agency would be unable to take action on some of the items on this agenda. -1- Executive Director Cole suggested that the political approach will probably be more effective and should be pursued when more information is available. We should find out why they took this position, develop a chronological statement on what we have done, and then contact Congressman Van Deerlin and Senators to determine if there is a course of action we can take to get our case heard by other than local or regional agencies. It was moved by Member Hobel, seconded by Member Scott and passed unanimously by those present that (1) staff be directed to contact the agencies who informed us of their opposition to our Plan and get a response from them in writing on what basis they are opposing it, and (2) proceed with a letter to all political entities stating that we attempted to get a response but were not able to, if that is the case, and express our concerns and outline how far we have gone along. ITEM NO. 2 - STATUS OF WRECKING YARDS - BAY BOULEVARD In response to the Agency's request, status of the wrecking yards on Bay Boulevard was given. Six auto wrecking firms are operating on Bay Boulevard, five of which are within the project boundaries. The operators were asked in 1971 to obtain a Condi- tional Use Permit or face possible abatement within a three year period. Despite considerable pressure by the City, no CUP's have been issued and the non-conforming use remains. The opßrators have complied by fencing their property but resist abate- ment due to a clause in the ordinance which relates to economic hardship. Therefore, as long as the premises are fenced and screened from public view. the uses can remain. Under the Bayfront Development Project, acquisition of the properties located in the project area is now permissible. After discussi.on of abatement proceedings, i.t was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member Scott and unanimously carried by those present that the Agency request the City Attorney and Special Counsel to make recommendations to the City Council on necessary modifications of the ordinance relating to abatement of nuisances, reporting at the next regular meeting of the Agency. It was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member Cox, and unanimously carried by those present that the report be accepted. ITEM NO. 3 - CONSIDERATION OF TERMS - STREET AND SONS PROPERTY Staff recommended that Mr. Street be informed that, in accordance with the terms of our Owner Participation Agreement, the wrecking use must continue to be phased out and be cleared off the property by January 1, 1978, and should no redevelopment proposals be submitted by that date, the Agency will consider obtaining acquisition appraisals rela- tive to the possible purchase of the property for resale for use in accordance with the Bayfront Plan. It was moved by Member Hobe1, seconded by Member Cox, and unanimously carried by those present that the report be accepted. ITEM NO. 4 - RESOLUTION NO. 98 - APPROVING CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR As funds provided in 1975 have been expended on an approved contract with Gruen Gruen + Associates, and in order to meet the need of continuing economic consulting services, staff is recommending that another contract with Gruen Gruen + Associates be approved for the Bayfront Redevelopment Project and that $15,000 be appropriated for payment -2- /0/0/77 of services. This firm will be prepared to meet with the Agency and the staff as necessary to perform 1) continuing analysis and evaluation of the Development Plan for the Bayfront, 2) additional assistance in responding to Coastal Commission con- cerns in order to achieve certification, and 3) consultation associated with soliciting and evaluating developer proposals for each element of the Bayfront Plan. In addition, the firm has agreed to provide consulting services concerning any other appropriate aspects of the Bayfront Plan and its implementation not specifically mentioned above. Executive Director Cole commented that. while the basic Bayfront Plan may be held up for a time, the portion of the Redevelopment District (Bayfront outside of the clouded area - the light footed clapper rail area) can be pursued and continued. He recommended that this contract should be extended so that other portions can be available as needed. Offered by Member Scott, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent of those present, passed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Members Scott, Hyde, Hobel, Cox Noes: None Absent: Member Egdahl ]TEM NO. 5 - RESOLUTION - APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TESTING LABORATORY, INC., FOR A SURCHARGE TEST PROGRAM WITHIN THE D STREET FILL AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR It was moved by Chairman Hyde that this item be filed. The motion was not seconded. It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Member Cox and unanimously carried by those present that this item be held over to the next meeting. ITEM NO. 6 - REPORT - STATUS OF COASTAL COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM The Agency, on September 1, 1977, approved a contract with Westec Services, Inc., for the completion of Phase II of the Bayfront Development Plan for presentation to the California Coastal Commission by the end of the calendar year. The work on the contract is pro- gressing on schedule, with City staff and the consultant working closely with the Coastal Commission staff and other governmental agencies in an attempt to resolve some of the major issues that remain. It was generally agreed by the Agency members that the scheduling should not be changed and that staff proceed with presentation to the Coastal Commission. It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Member Hobe1 and unanimously carried by those present that the report be accepted. ITEM NO. 7 - STATUS REPORT - LA JOLLA/COLLINS The developers of the Redevelopment focus area have indicated that they are still most anxious to pursue the development as previously approved. The major problem that has not yet been resolved is the cost of the land to the Agency and the resale price to the developer. Until the appraisals are completed, it is not possible for the negotiations to continue any further. It is anticipated that a major decision will be forthcoming at the November meeting of the Agency, at which time these costs can be better ascer- tained. The negotiation agreement also expires at that time. Concern was expressed that some people who have indicated an interest in participation agreements have not been contacted. It was observed that staff has conveyed concern -3- /0/6/77 of the Agency and that the developer could not look forward to easily convincing the Agency to extend the neogtiaUon agreement. It was moved by Member Cox, seconded by Member Scott and unanimously carried by those present that the report be accepted. lTEM NO. 8 - STATUS REPORTS - Third Avenue Street Improvement Plans Design Review Board Activities Appraisals for Collins Focus Area Alleys Off Third Avenue Chairman Hyde reported that he attended the Town Centre Project Area Committee meeting and they were all keenly enthusiastic about getting on with the street improvements. They voiced concern about having the City follow up and utilize its authority to see that ordinances and regulations regarding the project are clearly understood. If people do not cooperate or comply, either through lack of knowledge or just because they don't care to do so, the City should move to get compliance. There were also instances of signings which did not get design approval and which are not in keeping with the general design. Also, the City should be more decisive in maintenance of landscaping. The City should exercise its authority in a temporate and decisive way. It was generally agreed that a letter be prepared from the Mayor telling owners and tenants what the Redevelopment Agency is trying to accomplish and ask for their cooper- ation. This letter would also let them know where information can be obtained. It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Member Hobel and unanimously carried by those present that the reports be accepted. COMMENTS OF AGENCY MEMBERS Member Scott reported that, according to the Wall Street Journal, Honda is going to start a plant in Ohio and automobiles might follow them. Member Hobe1 commented that if the Japanese manufacturing plants would come to this area, there would be Federal training funds available, but the fact remains that the legis- lature and government have done nothing on the unitary tax, which is what is holding back anyone coming to California. Chairman Hyde adjourned the meeting at 7:55 P. M. to October 11,1977, following the next regularly scheduled Council meeting. -4- filED . ~¡ /ì" ,.. " I'"~ - , " ',- .. STATE OF CALIFORlHA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER COUNTY OF SA'J DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOU~'JMENT OF MEETING CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Lane F. Cole being first duly sworn deposes and says: That I am the duly chosen, qualified and Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista; That the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista was held at 7:00 P. M., October 6, 1977 and said meeting was adjourned to the time and place specified in the order of adjournment ATTACHED HERETO: That on October 7, 1977 at the hour of 11 :00 A. M. I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the pl~ce at which said ffi8eting of October 6, 1977 was held. ~;?e?- . Executlve 1 rector Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of October 1977 ~-,--,,-.--.:z... a.[)~ e OFFICIAL SEAL JANE A, DIEDRICHS '~ ...-'~ -.... NOTARY PUBLIC· CAUFORNIA , . . SAN D!EGO COUNTY al'y Fui:>lic in and Jor said County My comrtl. expi~es JAN 22, 1980 a d State of California ;;=-;;. 276 Fourth Ave" OIulo Vista, CA 92010 -"-- -----. -,'.- - --~-~-'-'-~-"- MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR !IEETING or THE REDEIJELOPi-:ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY or CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA ]Ü,ld Thursday, at 7'00 P. M. October 6, 1977 The Redevelopment Agency met in the Council Chamber ~~~~*Ä~X~~~ at the City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, on the above date at 7:00 p.m. wi th the fOllm.¡ing Hembers present: MEHBERS Hydp, Hohpl, Cox. Scott Absent Member Egdah 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ADJOUærHEiJT The Chairman adjoUl'ned the J:leeting until October 11,1977 immediately following the regular City Council meeting at 7: 00 p. m. in the Counci 1 CJlamber ClliäJOOGX:KX:ctJ(,XUJOO<tXWXII¡J¡lbjOO, Ci ty Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. I, Lane F. Cole, Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and eorree-t copy of an order adoptee! by the Redevelopment Agency at the meeting of October 6, 1977 . ~ - Lane F. Cole, Executive Directo Redevelopm8nt Agency City of Chula Vista, California ,. / I -"..""