Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1977/04/14 MINUTES OF A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Thursday April 14, 1977 A regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, California, was held on the above date, beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, with the following MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Scott, Members Egdahl, Hobel, Hyde, Cox MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Executive Director Cole, Special Counsel Reed, Community Development Coordinator Henthorn l. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Member Cox, seconded by Member Hyde and unanimously carried that the minutes of the meetings of February 24, March 3 and 10, 1977 be approved, copies having been sent to each member. 2. RESOLUTION NO. - Policy Member Hyde inquired if the policy had been presented for Acquisition of Real to the Town Centre Project Area Committee for comments. Property and Relocation Upon the reply from staff that the policy had not been presented to the Committee, Member Hyde stated his concern for its input. Motion to refer to It was moved by Member Hyde, seconded by Member Cox Project Area Committee and unanimously carried to refer the policy to the Town Centre Project Area Committee for recommendation. Discussion ensued relative to the negotiator as included in the policy. Special Counsel Reed stated that, depending on the number of acquisitions, staff could act as negotiator if the level of activities was small. If, on the other hand, there is a large number of acquisition, an impartial negotiator could be contracted. The policy does not establish who the negotiator might be but sets the policy for providing one. Member Cox concerns with the County Relocation personnel who are doing a disservice to the people on the Court site by not explaining the full benefits of relocating to them. He stated that he hopes that the application of the City's policy be totally explained to the people. Community Development Coordinator Henthorn responded that the law is explicit in this matter and in some cases, staff has advised people not to move. - 1 - 3. STATUS REPORT - As explained in a report to the Council, this is Collins/La Jolla the second in a 10 day interval series. The second Development Co. phase has focused upon owner/tenant participation Negotiations and design/layout. A newsletter and questionnaire had been sent out during the week of March 18-24 asking øwners their interest in owner participation. There have been nine responses. Staff has discussed with the architect the layout of buildings along Third Avenue and are encouraged by the firm's cooperation. Motion to accept report It was moved by Mayor Scott, seconded by Member Hyde and unanimously carried to accept staff's report. Update on Report Member Hobel requested an update on the report. Coordinator Henthorn responded that Director Desrochers had contacted the other owners relative to the questionnaire. Mr. Isham, Me. Bernes and Mr. Peters responded that they were interested in discussing owner participation. Mr. Milo Berenson Mr. Berenson stated he had not been contacted by anyone and is interested in owner participation. He commented that the center has 20 tenants and is waiting for Collins to come up with a more developed plan so they would come to some conclu- sion. He asked for an opportunity to talk with the Collins firm and mentioned the workshop session as stated ?t the previous meeting. Mr. Henthorn added that he had talked with Mr. Collins yesteraay and he is working the the major. Mr. Collins had stated that he was encouraged by the market's acceptance of the proposal. The drug situation remains to be resolved relative to the site compatibility. In addition, he had contacted two savings and loans that are willing to move onto the site. Until they have a ballpark figure on the lease rates, they are reluctant to discuss owner pa rti ci pa ti on. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 76 Presently, the current contract amount is close to its APPROVING CONTRACT FOR 1 imit and shoul d be renewed if recei pt of thei r servi ce SERVICES WITH GRUEN GRUEN is to be expected. Speci fi ca lly, it is proposed to + ASSOCIATES RELATIVE TO THE focus their services as follows: 1) analysis of TOWN CENTRE REDEVELOPMENT developer's concept plan; 2) review of financial plan PROJECT submitted by developer; 3) justification of resale price of land; 4) review, assistance in the preparation of a Disposition and Development Agreement. Resolution Offered Offered by Member Cox, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Member Cox, Scott, Egdahl, Hobel, Hyde NOES: None ABSENT: None - 2 - 4/14/77 r 5a. RESOLUTION NO. 77 It is proposed to obtain another real estate appraisal APPROVING CONTRACT WITH on the 4+ acres owned by Mr. Richard Zogob and Mr. MR. TOM ROBERTS FOR Frank Ferri era. Due to the complexity of the cir- APPRAISAL SERVICES cumstances regarding the development of this parcel, a second independent opinion of value is warranted. After consulting with legal counsel, it is proposed to utilize the services of Mr. Tom Roberts, MAl, for a second appraisal. The use of all comparable sales data, except for the completed valuation study, obtained by Mr. Johnson (first appraisal) is permissable and proposed. Resolution offered Offered by Member Hyde, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Member Hyde, Cox, Scott, Egdahl, Hobel Noes: None Absent: None 5b. RESOLUTION NO. 78 Resolution No. 59 authorized appraisal services with APPROVING NOTICE TO PROCEED the Lee C. Johnson Co. In accordance with the terms WITH APPRAISALS/MR. LEE of our agreement, Agency action is required prior to JOHNSON authorizing the conduct of additional appraisals. It is requested that the Ferriera parcel fronting Fourth Avenue between Center Street and the Park be appraised. Resolution offered Offered by Member Hyde, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and adoped by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Member Hyde, Cox, Scott, Egdahl, Hobel Noes: None Absent: None 6. STATUS REPORT - Design Review Plans have been approved to remodel four store fronts New/Remodeling Projects as proposed by the new property owner, Tom Money at 361-271 Third Avenue. Signs were also favorably re- viewed for the new location of the Third Avenue News as were the plans for a family room addition. At present, two applications are pending, one for signing and another for the construction of an office building on Third Avenue. In addition, staff has met with owners and agents with regard to the construction of an apart- ment house on Del Mar; the remodeling of the El Primero Hotel to offices; the vacant service station at Third and Alvarado; the construction of several additional commercial structures along Third. Motion to accept report It was moved by Member Hobel, seconded by Member Hyde and unanimously carried to accept the report. QUARTERLY REPORT - At the present time, it appears that progress is being Joe Street Property/Extension made toward the development of the site. The owner of Interim Participation is not receiving any new inventory so as to facilitate Agreement - 3 - 4/14/77 moving the operation to their new site. The most encouraging sign, however, is that the owner has made a franchise commitment to å nationally recognized, quality motel chain. Member Hyde questioned if a time schedule had been drawn on this new development. Coordinator Henthorn responded nothing had been discussed between staff and the owner. Motion to accept report It was moved by Member Egdahl, seconded by Member Hyde and unanimously carried to accept the report and continue the terms of the present interim Owner Participation Agreement for another three months and so advise the owner. 8. STATUS REPORT - The Lawless Detroit Diesel Building, under construction Lawless Detroit Diesel at Bay and G Street, has passed the two-thirds stage of completion. Opening is expected by the end of May. The facility will not only be a significant addition to the project but, will contribute a sizable sum to the City's sales tax revenue. Motion to accept report It was moved by Member Cox, seconded by Member Egdahl and unanimously carried to accept the report. 9. STATUS REPORT - Coastal It was moved by Mayor Scott, seconded by Member Hyde to Commission and Litigation continue the agenda and after which recess to Motion to continue agenda Executive Session. The motion passed unanimously. At a public hearing held on March 25, 1977, staff presented the San Diego Coast Regional Commission with a critique of the "Interpretive Guidelines for Coastal Planning and Permits". The Commission entered the critique into the record and was requested to give consideration to the "strike out" version of the guidelines. Staff intends to closely monitor the adoption of process in an effort to gain input into the finalization of the guidelines. Upon final adoption, staff will report to the Agency on the steps necessary to attain certification of the Bayfront Plan. Motion to accept report It was moved by Member Cox, seconded by ~1ember Hobel and unanimously carried to accept the report. JACK HENTHORN'S RESIGNATION Executive Director Cole announced that Coordinator FROM CITY SERVICE Henthorn has accepted a job as Redevelopment Coordinator in Carlsbad and this being his last meeting wished him well in his new position. Mayor Scott stated that Council wishes him good luck and expressed their appreciation of the job done here. ~~REWELL TO CHAIRMAN SCOTT The Agency bid farewell to Chairman Scott and expressed appreciation for his tenure as Chairman of the Agency. - 4 - 4/14/77 MEMBERS COMMENTS None. ¡AIRMAN COMMENTS Chairman Scott stated he had sent a memo to Council relative to utilizing Chula Vista's D Street Fill as a possible location for a Honda assembly plant. As announced in the press, the Japanese firm is interested in locating in California and there are only three sites on the coast that could be used: Hunter's Point, National City and Chula Vista. He had proceeded to talk with various other people including Gruen Gruen + Associates, Senator Mills, the Economic Development Corporation and Bob Campbell of the Port District. Their comments were all favorable to proceed. Senator Mills suggested sending a letter which he would hand carry to the Governor expressing the Redevelopment Agency's desire to discuss this matter and also stating that there are certain problems: 1) no access - I-54/I-5 interchange would need to be completed; and 2) the Coastal Commission. Senator Mills believed that Governor Brown would be receptive. When Gruen Gruen + Associates were contacted, they felt the same about the I-54/I-5 interchange and cooperátion from the Coas ta 1 Commi ss i on. They felt this development could be done with the present plan. They advi sed to approach caustiously but with some vigor. )ncern with the envi ronment Member Hobel stated he was disturbed by staff's recommendation in that if the City waits for a statement of interest from the firm, they are going to go someplace else. Secondly, as far as endangered species, it is the person that is looking for a job. He felt the City should agressively pursue this matter and invite the Japanese firm here to talk. They have no reservations about going northwest should we not show interest. Chances of certification Chairman Scott inquired as to the chances of certification of the present Bayfront Plan. Executive Director Cole responded that communications are getting better with the Coastal Commission but there are still hurdles to overcome. Staff feels that we are making progress but it depends on the finalized guidelines. Coordi nator Henthorn stated that at this point in time, we stand probably 75% chance of getting the plan as developed at staff level certified. Industrial usage of the D Street fill in light of the Coastal regulations could create some problems. Member Hyde stated his concern as to going forth with this new development and its impact on the current Bayfront Pl an. The development is appealing and attractive but should be approach cautiously without abandoning the Bayfront Plan. Member Cox stated that there should be a way to utilize both an assembly plant and the Bayfront plan together. 4/14/77 - 5 - --_.~_......- The industrial could very well benefit the entire plan, bringing in I-54, the finanical impact and pro- viding more employment. He felt the City should proceed and express interest; there is always the option to refuse. Member Egdahl commented that all of the possible sites were going to have a problem with the Coastal Commission. He stated he never favored housing in the plan and that the tax increments from this type of development would greatly boost the City's revenue. Chairman Scott added that the Honda firm's interest is very tentative but if brought to the attention of the Governor, we might have a chance. Gruen & Gruen did not say it was not compatible with our plan now. It is realized there are some problems but contacts should be made to solicit assistance. Member Hobel added that an assembly plant is clean industry and could very well be the impetus for the current plan. Motion to proceed It was moved by Member Hobel, seconded by Member Cox and unanimously carried that the Chairman on behalf of the Agency proceed to make initial contacts expressing interest in the Japanese assembly plant location, verifying this through the Governor. Bond Status Member Egdahl asked as far as the bond issue on the Bayfront Project which was sold, what latitude is there to alter the plan on record. Counsel Reed responded there is room to amend the record not only on a legal basis but on a practical basis. The bonds are paying off and should be completely paid off in a year or two. Report back Member Hobel requested that the Chairman keep the Agency informed as to the progress he has made. Adjournment to Executive Session The Chairman adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. to Executive Session and from there to the next regularly scheduled meeting of May 5, 1977 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Jac 4/14/77