HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1976/01/08
REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Thursday January 8, 1976
A regularly scheduled meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Chula Vista, California, was held on the above date beginning at 7:30 p.m.
in the Council Conference Room, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, with the
following
1. Members present: Chairman Hamilton, Members Scott, Hobel, Hyde, Egdahl
Members absent: None
Staff present: Executive Director Cole, City Attorney Lindberg,
Community Development Director Desrochers, Director
of Parks & Recreation Hall, Assistant Director of
Public Works Lippitt
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Member Hobel, seconded by
Member Hyde and unanimously carried by
those present that the minutes of the
meeting of December 11, 1975 be approved,
copies having been sent to each Member.
(Member Scott arrived at this time)
3. RESOLUTION NO. 33 - Referring to his written report to the
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR Agency, Community Development Director
ENGINEERING SERVICES Desrochers explained that requests for
TO WILSEY AND HAM - proposals for engineering services for
BAYFRONT PROJECT the Bayfront project went out to twelve
area firms and ten responded. A screening
committee narrowed the field down to
three firms. The recommendation of the
Oral Interview Board was the selection
of Wilsey and Ham. The cost for the
services is $94,800.
Resolution offered Offered by Member Hobel, the reading of
the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Members Hobel, Hamilton, Hyde,
Egdahl, Scott
Noes: None
Absent: None
-113-
4. RESOLUTION NO. 34 - Director Desrochers reported that the
ENTERING INTO AN OWNER conditional use permit for the auto
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT wrecking yard at Bay Boulevard and "E"
WITH JOENEAL STREET Street expired December 1, 1975. On
December 22, 1975, the Planning Commission
suggested that the Agency direct the
owner to discontinue the automobile
wrecking yard as of April 1, 1976.
Mr. Desrochers recommended that in place
of the conditional use permit, an owner
participation agreement be entered into,
to allow the wrecking yard use until
December 1, 1976 and then provide a
ninety-day notice period to discontinue
the use.
Joeneal Street In answer to the Chairman's query, Mr.
Owner Street stated he would clear the area
immediately if a bona fide restaurant
wanted to construct on the property. He
would need sixty to ninety days notice
and would relocate on an area near Brown
Field.
Discussion of Motels Discussion followed regarding Mr. Street's
efforts to negotiate for a motel on this
property.
Member Scott questioned utilizing the
services of Gruen and Gruen in this
regard. Mr. Desrochers said that the
Gruens will be present at the next meeting
and can discuss the matter: at the present
time, they feel they need more market
data before they can participate in this.
The Agency concurred that they should
take an aggressive role in helping Mr.
Street - meet with and negotiate with
prospective clients - to get this property
developed.
Resolution offered Offered by Member Egdahl, the reading of
the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Members Egdahl, Scott, Hobel,
Hamilton, lIyde
Noes: None
Absent: None
-114-
Motion for staff It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by
direction Chairman Hamilton and unanimously carried
to ask the staff to assist, rather than
cooperate, and become partners with the
Redevelopment Agency and the property owner
on the Bayfront and "E" Street property.
Mr. Hasselbring Mr. Hasselbring showed the Agency a rendering
Partner, Speakeasy of his proposed restaurant explaining that
Restaurant construction would be from 4 1/2 to 6 months;
the seating capacity would be in two sections:
170 in the banquet-type area and 147 in the
restaurant; the total square footage would
be 8,000 square feet.
5. REPORT - TIIIRD AVENUE Community Development Director Desrochers
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT explained the Project Work Program calendar.
WORK PROGRAM The third week in August, the County Tax
Assessor will set the tax rate, and if the
Redevelopment Project is completed before
that date, the City would be able to capture
the March 1975 tax rolls instead of the 1976
tax rolls. June 22 will be the date for the
adoption of the ordinance.
Report accepted It was moved by Member Hobel, seconded by
Member Hyde and unanimously carried that
the report be accepted.
6. REPORT - GRUEN GRUEN AND Director Desrochers submitted the progress
ASSOCIATES BAYFRONT report for the first month of the five~month
PROGRESS REPORT economic and development analysis for the
Bayfront Project as presented by Claude
Gruen, consultant.
The Agency discussed the working relationship
with the Gruens and Wilsey and Ham. Mr.
Desrochers indicated that the consultants
will meet with representatives of Wilsey and
Ham to exchange information.
Mr. Desrochers then discussed the meeting
held in San Francisco with the consultants -
specifically what needed to be done to build
on Gunpowder Point.
Members Egdahl and Scott, who attended this
mee t ing, noted some of the issues also dis-
cussed: the first phase of the development,
residential development, the recreational-
commercial aspect, and the desirability of
getting a large hotel to build on Gunpowder
Point.
-115-
Report accepted It wasmmoved by Member Hobel, seconded by
Member Egdahl and unanimously carried that
the staff report be accepted.
7. STATUS REPORT - A draft of the guidelines was presented to
DEVELOPER GUIDELINES, the Agency. Mr. Desrochers, Community
BAYFRONT PROJECT Development Director, explained that the data
lists the mechanical steps necessary for Agency
consideration. In addition, the conceptual
design elements of the Sedway-Cooke Plan
are provided for each development area.
Suggestion for insert Member Hobel commented that he was concerned
that although the staff is referenced in the
guidelines in dealing with potential developers,
the Chairman or the two-Member committee is
not. When this is sent to the potential
developers, they should know that the elected
officials are also working on this. Mr.
Desrochers stated he would insert this in-
formation.
Member Scott suggested a telephonic conference
once a month with the consultants.
Report accepted It was moved by Member Egdahl, seconded by
with amendment Member Hyde and unanimously carried that the
report be accepted, as amended.
APPOINTMENT OF COMMITTEE Member Scott suggested the Agency appoint the
two Member committee to work with the consul-
tants and potential developers.
Member Hyde spoke against appointing two Members
stating that on all issues relating to the
Bayfront project, the Agency as a whole should
participate. In those instances where this
is not possible, the Agency should follow the
procedure of the City Council -- the Mayor
meets with the developer; if he is not able
to do so, then the Vice-Mayor comes in; if this
is not possible, then a member of the Council
is called.
Motion for Agency It was moved by Member Hyde and seconded by .
guidelines Member Egdahl that, at this point in time,
the Agency in its relationships with the
consultant, follow the same working procedures
that the City Council of Chula Vista follows,
namely that all policy matters are resolved
with full Agency, and that if necessary to
implement close working relationships with
-116-
the consultants. that individuals - either
the Chairman or the Vice Chairman or the
Chairman's designee could be contact points
with the consultants on a random basis rather
than fixed.
Discussion of motion Member Scott commented that Member Hyde, by
his Taotion, appointed the Chairman and the
Vice Chairman as the two-member committee.
Member Egdahl commented that the motion
stated the Chairman "or" the Vice Chairman
"or" Chairman's designee - one person.
Motion to table It was moved by Member Scott and seconded
by Member Egdahl that the matter be tabled.
Motion carried The motion to table carried by the following
vote, to-wit:
AYES: Members Scott, Egdahl, Hamilton
Noes: Members Hyde, Hobel
Absent: None
Matter to be rediscussed It was moved by Member Egdahl and seconded
at next meeting by Member Hyde that this item be placed on
the next agenda of the Redevelopment Agency
meeting for discussion, refinement of policy
and practice.
City Attorney Lindberg explained that Member
Egdahl can move to discuss the whole matter -
not the motion made tonight.
Motion carried The motion carried by the following vote,-
to-wit:
AYES: Members Egdahl, Hyde, Hobel, Hamilton
Noes: Member Scott
Absent: None
ADJOURNMENT Chairman Hamilton adjourned the meeting at
9:00 p.m. to the next meeting scheduled for
February 5, 1976 at 7:30 p.m.
(2 . âCJ;t·
;;':J¿::tZ1U-ò 7t:~Úr
. . Secretary / -117-