HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1988/04/07
AGENDA
AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Thursday, April 7, 1988
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
ROLL CALL;" ,q¡¡ "ores<-,,+- /I,. ,
/Va.-der ".. '-/l?dco ~1 ax!t.{/ljë(j' ",X; I 3(:; i" --r>,
1. ,APPR~OVAL 0 MINUTES - 3/15/88, 3/22/88, and 3/29/88 , ' ]
Y1¡5 ((ê- (' bJL) ¥¡MYl-'¿ -' (["-1:: .:l-tf.¿:t;iu~/' ·5/.22) 'f11cd!."f:y¡ 4"".t,x~~r:: )
2. RESOLUTI ~pproving Pac~fic Southwest Biological 'i¿q
Services, Inc. as the consultant to prepare a biological
report on the endangered species in the Chula vista
Bayfront and authorizing the agreement
'h15(~~5?t,)V/,;;l~10J)tÇ~/UbV v-t- fh-d;/; ~"~ ¿~ YJ{~.
3. RESOLUTION~/b Accepting deed for properties located
at 281-287 Landis Avenue in Chula vista and directing
the Secretary to record the deed
Co)L ~Á..-ed2- ( 3 -0 ~ L/L,~L 'P ~é.ðé.IYG YLC T ~f-t u.J'~ )
4. REPORT: America'·s cup ,
'-1J15ct ¿, ('/J1è.t,y.t.-~ / _'.o;¿ ) ~:r Ju~;¡-
5. REPORT: Circulati6n, Parking and Landscaping Plan
for the Chula vist, Center
'f'~.s ('IJ1~/ /Ytd.<!~~~ ~rv-e-~ P!!i!/ M.:.#P-/~'~~¿#4-<!~·
~L COMMUNICATIONS cu:e£ .fdj'--/:h1j?' /ff,ÃA.f.vJ;LP~:;¡""!~~' l'
,prI.L- ..(/v. ~~, (f-/; Y'¿a.;d/¿.J. t,;;t1~~£..)
6. DIRECTOR'S REPORT v
a. Parking Structure Brick Fascia Repairs
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
'-1Ze'71£/
8. MEMBERS' COMMENTS
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE MEETING TO DISCUSS:
Sierra Club vs. Marsh;
Sierra Club vs. Coastal Commission, et. al.; and
Potential acquisition of property located at:
327 "R" Street (Michael & Susan Adkins,
owners), and
329 "H" Street (Edwin & Jean Jones and
J,erry ~Kar~n Alt, 9wners)
~,1 r!;{¡ C/..cr;Jßd/~ë)'0 .
ADJOURNMENT1to the regular meet~ng of Apr~l 21, 1988 at
4:00 p.m.
-"..~~._------
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Thursday, April 7, 1988
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Cox; Members Moore and McCandl iss; Members
Nader and Malcolm arrived at 7:30 p.m.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
STAFF PRESENT:
Executive Director Goss, Community Development
Director Desrochers, Assistant Community Development
Director Gustafson, Redevelopment Coordinator Kassman,
Director of Planning Kremp1, Agency Attorney Harron
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 3/15/88,3/22/88 and 3/29/88
This item was trailed pending the arrival of an additional member.
2. RESOLUTION
APPROVING PACIFIC SOUTHWEST BIOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC. AS
THE CONSULTANT TO PREPARE A BIOLOGICAL REPORT ON THE
ENDANGERED SPECIES IN THE CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT AND
AUTHORIZING THE AGREEMENT
Community Development Director Desrochers suggested t~is item be continued to
the fi rst meeti ng of the Redevelopment Agency 1 n May due to recent
developments in the litigation concerning the Bayfront at the U.S. District
Court.
MSUC (Cox/McCand1iss) to continue this item to the first meeting in May.
ACCEPTING DEED FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 281-287
LANDIS AVENUE IN CHULA VISTA AND DIRECTING THE
SECRETARY TO RECORD THE DEED
3. RESOLUTION 916
At the meeting of March 1, 1988, the Agency approved the purchase of
properties at 281-287 Landis Avenue for a price mutually agreed upon by the
sell ers and the Agency. Thi s transacti on is currently in escrow. The deed
for the property is bei ng submi tted into escrow and wi 11 be conveyed to the
Agency upon close of escrow. The Agency was requested to accept the deed and
authorize recordance.
THE RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED BY CHAIRMAN COX, the reading of
by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
Members Nader and Malcolm were not present for the vote.)
the text was waived
(The vote was 3-0;
MINUTES
-2-
April 7, 1988
America's Cup
4. REPORT:
The Agency has taken the foll owi ng acti ons regardi ng Chu1 a Vi sta 's ro1 e in a
San Di ego Yacht C1 ub defense of the Ameri ca 's Cup: The Agency consi dered a
staff report on a Chu1 a Vi sta Ameri ca I s Cup Task Force and provi ded some
nominee suggestions; and the Agency requested a report on how Chula Vista
cou1 d capi tal i ze on the Ameri ca I s Cup event. Thi s report responded to those
actions.
Chairman Cox stated John Ray has expressed interest in being a member of this
task force.
Assistant Community Development Director
desirable to receive 8 - 10 names from
candidates for the task force.
Gustafson stated it wou1 d be
each Agency member as potential
Member McCand1 i ss stated she wou1 d 1 i ke to have a 1 arger commi ttee. Because
of the magnitude of this effort, one group to be considered are those people
who are not the racing syndicate, but those who come from all over the world
to view the race and need a home base. This focus may be a possibility for
the City.
MS (McCand1iss/Cox) to accept the staff report.
Member Moore commented
committee is desirable.
by each Agency member.
The motion passed unanimously.
he agrees with Member McCand1iss that a larger
He suggested that an additional 5 names be submitted
CIRCULATION, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE CHULA VISTA
CENTER
5. REPORT:
The last step in the planning process for the expansion and renovation of the
Chu1 a Vi sta Center is approval of the Ci rcu1 ati on, Park i ng and Landscapi ng
Plan. With the approval of these plans, Homart will have all of the
discretionary approvals required for construction of the overall Center.
Mr. Desrochers reported that representatives from Homart Development were
present at the meeting to discuss the plans. The revised plans were received
by the City on Tuesday, AprilS, 1988 and the Planning staff has reviewed the
plans. At the last Agency meeting it was suggested that a comparative
analysis be prepared of various cities and shopping centers to see what
standards are required by other cities with regard to landscaping and larking
lots. Community Development prepared a study whi ch shows the City 0 Chu1 a
Vista in the mainstream with other cities as far as requirements and that
Chu1a Vista is not being overly burdensome on developers with regard to
1 andscape requirements. Another important e1 ement to consi der is that the
Chu1a Vista Center is being redeveloped and some of the centers looked at in
this study are new centers.
MINUTES
-3-
April 7, 1988
Director of Planning Krempl stated approval of the landscape plan is being
recommended subject to three conditions, two of which Homart agreed to on this
date, and the third one still needs to be discussed. Mr. Kremp1 pointed out
the City Landscape Manual requires a landscape strip 10 feet in minimum
dimension between the parking area and the public right-of-way. In addition
to that there is a requirement within the parking lot itself for 10% of the
parking lot area to be landscaped. The landscape guidelines go on to say that
a pleasing, decorative paving of brick, stone or tile will be considered in
lieu of plant ground cover as long as one tree, a minimum 16 sq. ft. cut-out
for every 100 square feet of decorative paving, is also included.
Mr. Kremp1 further reported that along Broadway there is 7 feet of landscaping
on private property and along H Street there is 9 feet of landscaping in the
current plan. In terms of the landscaping percentages within the parking lot,
currently based on Homart' s p1 an, 6% wou1 d be 1 andscaped (4% short of the
standard). The applicant has suggested and agreed to provision of decorative
paving within the parking lot which would add an additional approximately 1%,
bringing the total amount of landscaped area up to 7%. However, with
inclusion of the decorative paving, Homart is disagreeing with the one
additional tree per 100 square feet of the decorative paving area. This would
amount to approximately 40-45 additional trees.
Mr. Kremp1 stated the Planning Department is generally satisfied with the
balance of the site plan. The first two conditions (agreed to by Homart) were:
1. The tree wells which consist of pavement cutouts with redwood headers
are not acceptable. All trees must be located in planters with
standard concrete curbs or protected with tree grates and guards.
2. The printed asphalt and slat finished concrete pedestrian walkways in
the park i ng area must be rep1 aced with enhanced textured/colored
concrete, pavers or brick.
Member McCand1 i ss poi nted out her pri ori ti es are to have a good depth of
landscaping along the streets, well-landscaped and attractive; attractive
landscaping near the mall and then have some level of interior parking
landscaping (this would be less of a priority).
Mr. Thomas Gourguechon representi ng Homart Development addressed the Agency.
He pointed out the City staff analysis excluded consideration of 130 trees in
the buffer area along Broadway and H Street; shrubbery, flowers and
demon strati on garden were not taken into consi derati on. In additi on, between
the curb at the building and the building itself (the exterior side of the
mall), there is an additional 58 trees; within the mall there is another 44
trees. This brings the total number of trees to approximately 520 trees
(including the 288 trees in the parking field). Each one of those trees
requires additional work (irrigation and curbing).
MINUTES
-4-
April 7 1988
Mr. Gourguechon further commented he bel i eves the center is over-1 andscaped
from a functional point of view. On "H" Street and Broadway there is a
3-3-1/2 foot continuous hedge which separates the site visually from the
street, however, this screens the view of the center from cars driving by. He
further pointed out the importance of the design and intensity of the interest
of Homart on the interior of the shopping center. Homart is now at the point
where they have exceeded their landscape projections significantly enough
where they are now considering taking a look at the plans for the interior to
offset the costs incurred on the exterior.
At this point the Agency members left the dais to view renderings of the plans.
Mr. Kremp1 commented that in requesting the additional trees, the location is
flexible.
Mr. Gourguechon added Homart has been restri cted by easements, 1 easeho1 ds,
separate property owners, by parking requirements that are in leases. It was
necessary to consi der these items as well as the tenants, co-anchors (Sears
and Broadway), and J.C. Penneys. Many tenants are operating under leases that
are 20 years old which have restrictions pertaining to parking. Therefore,
Homart is not in strict compliance to the City guidelines, however, Homart has
made efforts to accommodate City staff and Design Review Committee
considerations.
Member Nader asked for a clarification of the type of trees to be included in
the 1 andscapi ng. Mr. Steven Ormenyi, 1 andscape architect for the project,
stated the trees that are in the field of the parking lot are Carrot Wood
trees which are evergreen. The trees on the edges are Golden Rain trees which
are deciduous. A tree which was removed from the plan was the Fern Pine
because it is so invasive with it's roots.
MS (Malcolm/Nader) approval of Mr. Kremp1 's recommendation.
Respondi ng to Member Nader's questi on regardi ng what wou1 d happen if the
additional 40-45 trees were not required, Mr. Krempl stated the hardscape
wou1 d remai n the same and there wou1 d be a net 6% of the total center
1 andscaped. The Desi gn Review Commi ttee di sapproved the 1 andscape p1 an and
they have not seen the most recent version.
Mr. Gourguechon stated that a non-deci si on on the 1 andscape pl an does not
allow the civil engineering work to proceed. The curbing for the planters and
the design of the irrigation system are major issues to be considered.
Respondi ng to Mr. Nader, Mr. Gourguechon sai d that the cost and schedu1 i ng
issues wou1 d make it very diffi cult to return to the Desi gn Revi ew Committee
to work out a hardscape plan different than what is being presented.
Responding to Member Malcolm's questions, Mr. Kremp1 stated Terra Nova
Shopping Center met all of the City's landscaping guidelines. Member Malcolm
commented the City has already given in on many issues with regard to this
project. Staff is not aSking Homart to meet the full guidelines. He feels
Homart should meet the standards being recommended by staff at this time.
MINUTES
-5-
April 7, 1988
Responding to Member Nader I s questi ons, Mr. Gourguechon stated until this
eveni ng he was under the impression that the 40-45 trees in questi on wou1 d
have to be located where the enhanced pavi ng is located. There is some
flexibility as to where the trees can be located, however, consideration must
be given to the irrigation system.
Member Nader asked if it wou1 d be possi b1 e to identify a certain amount of
square footage that would be devoted to some type of 1andscape/hardscape in
lieu of the additional trees. Mr. Kremp1 stated this may be possible. It is
his understanding that Homart's major concern with regard to the trees is the
cost. There is flexibility on where the trees can be placed. He is confident
locations can be found where the irrigation exists and views will not be
blocked and still be able to accommodate the number of trees in question. Mr.
Kremp1 stated there were 3,500 square feet of aspha1 t pedestri an areas that
were goi ng to be painted, however, were taken out of consi derati on earl i er
this afternoon. This could be reinstated in the plan and treated in the same
way as the other hardscape with the decorative treatment.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION
MS (Nader/McCand1iss) direct that staff establish a square footage equivalent
to the 40-45 trees to be set asi de for some sort of 1 andscapi ng other than
asphalt (shrubs, ground cover, creative hardscape).
Member McCand1iss suggested making
or come up with the alternative.
the motion.
it either/or - either add the 40-45 trees
Member Nader stated that is the intent of
Mr. Kremp1 stated it is the preference of staff to have the trees because of
the canopy form and the visual from the exterior.
Member McCand1iss withdrew her second of the motion.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION
MS (Moore/Malcolm) approve the staff recommendation, modified as follows: add
approximately 40 trees; flexibility in their location in considering viewing
corridors and in conjunction with the irrigation system.
Mr. Gourguechon stated the cost of these trees will affect other parts of the
project.
Member Nader stated he has a problem with a specified number of trees, not out
of concern for Homart I s costs, but out of a concern that he feel s more
creative landscape solutions should be explored.
The motion passed. The vote was 4-1 with Member Nader voting no.
MINUTES
-6-
April 7, 1988
~
Member McCand1iss stated since there is a concern of site lines, it would be
appropriate for Homart to have the lead in placement of the trees.
Chairman Cox asked for an update from Homart regarding the leasing situation.
Mr. Gourguechon stated the center is at this point 63-64% leased; they are
projecting approximately 80% occupancy on October 27 (opening day).
Member Moore stated the Council agreed in concept to allowing a sign to go on
the corner of Third and H Street promoting the shopping center and downtown.
He asked Mr. Gourguechon if this had been communicated to him. Mr.
Gourguechon stated Homart wou1 d 1 ike the opportunity to do some promotional
work. He felt that any location that announces the project on the east side
of the City is an advantage. An additional location would be on East H Street
near I-80S.
Member Nader asked about the pedestrian walkways. Mr. Gourguechon stated that
in the cases where Homart is providing pedestrian access, as of this
afternoon's meeti ng, those are enhanced concrete. It is the understandi ng of
Homart that it would be textured, tinted concrete. Member Nader further asked
if there is some type of physical barrier between cars and pedestrians. Mr.
Gourguechon responded there is a curb.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 3/15/88, 3/22/88, and 3/29//88
MSUC (Moore/Cox) approve the minutes of 3/15/88, 3/22/88 and 3/29/88 as
submitted. (Chairman Cox abstained from voting on the minutes of 3/22; Member
Ma1co1m.abstained from voting on the minutes of 3/29.)
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
6. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
a. Parking Structure Brick Fascia Repairs
Executi ve Di rector Goss reported there has been a problem with the bri ck
veneer pulling away from the walls of the elevators of the parking structure.
Based on information received at this point, the problem is not a settlement
or structural problem. It is an inconsistent bonding of the veneer to the
wall. Staff is currently exploring further to determine if this is the
responsibi1 i ty of the general contractor or subcontractor who di d the veneer
work.
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
None.
MINUTES
-7-
April 7, 1988
8. MEMBERS' COMMENTS
Member Moore:
Member Moore stated the Social Security Office is now located in the new
building across from LaBella's Pizza on Third Avenue. He is under the
impression that the Agency gave advice on this location. He would 1 ike the
Agency to receive a copy of the minutes that would substantiate this.
Member Moore further questi oned the use of thi s 1 ocati on for the Soci a1
Securi ty Offi ceo He understands there may not be an ordi nance that wou1 d
prevent such a use in a retail location. Member Moore also feels the business
community shoul d be informed of these matters in the very begi nni ng stages.
He wou1 d 1 ike the Agency to be brought up to date at the next meeti ng
regarding the pros and cons, etc. and if there should be a change in
ordinances.
Chai rman Cox commented that he and Member McCand1 i ss had a meeti ng on thi s
date with members of the Downtown Committee and they had a draft of a letter
to be submitted to the Council /Agency that expressed their concern about the
location of the Social Security Office.
Member McCand1 iss stated what Mr. Moore has addressed may meet some of the
concerns that she has had with regard to Otay Valley Road where there are
buildings going in that have parking spaces designed around a proposed use,
and then the actual use of the building requires more parking.
Member McCandliss:
One of the items on toni ght' s agenda accepted the deed on properti es located
at 281-287 Landis Avenue. The Agency has purchased a number of properties on
Landis for parking. Member McCand1 iss asked if staff has considered the
possibility of decking up one level and taking in 3-4 properties. Mr.
Desrochers stated by acquiring the properties, it would give the City
sufficient space to deck if possible. With this amount of land it gives staff
the flexibility to explore such alternatives.
Member Moore commented on the parking lots located at Church and Del Mar. Mr.
Desrochers stated there is an easement problem on the Del Mar property. The
property immediately north of the existing Del Mar parking lot is using about
20 feet of the City's property without any rights. This was discovered in the
survey and staff is attempting to resolve this situation. Member Moore
commented the City should not surrender the property.
Chai rman Cox asked if the Agency approved the pl ans for the constructi on of
the parking lot behind the old Central Federal building, and if so, when will
constructi on begi n. Redevelopment Coordi nator Kassman stated the p1 ans have
been revi ewed and the correcti ons are bei ng made at thi s time. The p1 ans
should be back in the next week, and if they are acceptable to the Engineering
Department, it can go out to bid later this month or in May.
MINUTES
-8-
April 7, 1988
Chairman Cox further asked the status of the remaining parcels on the proposed
School District site. Mr. Desrochers responded it is necessary to relocate
South Bay Community Services before any further action can be taken.
ADJOURNMENT at 8:48 p.m. to Closed Session to discuss Sierra Club vs. Marsh;
Sierra Club vs. Coastal Commission, et a1., and potential acquisition of
p,roperty located at 327 "H" Street (Michael & Susan Adkins, owners), and 329
'H" Street (Edwi n & Jean Jones and Jerry & Karen Alt, owners).
ADJOURNMENT from Closed Session at 9:30 to the regular meeting of April 21,
1988, at 4:00 p.m.
ç!i{ C
pJ. es o~~
~
Community Development Director
WPC 3541H