Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRCC AGENDA PK 2002/05/29 Negatjve Declaraöol'l PROJECT NAME: Southwest Redevelopment Plan Amendment To Extend Eminent Domain Authority PROJECT LOCATION: Southwest Redevelopment Project Area ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: V ARlOUS PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista CASE NO.: IS-02-048 DATE: May 29, 2002 A. Proiect Setting The amended Southwest Redevelopment Project Area (SWRPA) boundaries, found totally within the City of Chula Vista, are illustrated on the map attached hereto and incorporated as Exhibit A. B. Project Description The project involves an amendment to the existing Amended Southwest Redevelopment Project Area Plan, dated November 1990. While the Redevelopment Plan itself does not expire until the year 2030, the power of eminent domain, which the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista may exercise (under the provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law) is set to expire on November 26, 2002, unless otherwise amended. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, with the approval of the City Council, proposes to amend that Plan by extending the provision of eminent domain to"November 27, 2014, as allowed by California Community Redevelopment Law. Although there are no current plans to acquire additional property through the use of eminent domain, the Agency has indicated that should either a commercial or residential project be undertaken in the future, that the extension of the time limit to exercise its eminent domain powers could be crucial to the success and completion of those projects, and hence, to its overall success in removing blight from the Project Area. C. Compliance with Zoning and Plans The proposed use is consistent with the underlying zone districts and General Plan designation, D. Comments On April 29, 2002 a Notice of Initial Study was circulated to City and governmental staff. Seven Department staff members responded with no comments. 1 OS/29/02 E. Identification of Environmental Effects An Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including an attached Environment.al Checklist form) determined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. This Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. F. Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Impacts NO MITIGATION REQUIRED G. Consultation 1. City of Chula Vista: Marilyn Ponseggi, Planning Division Paul Hellman, Planning Division John Schmitz, Planning Division Jim Geering, Fire Marshall Frank Rivera, Engineering Department Joe Gamble, Landscape Architecture Division Bill Ullrich, Public Works/Operations Frank Herrera-A, Planning Division Miguel Z. Tapia, Community Development Benjamin Guerrero, Community Development 2. Documents Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code, September 1997 Redevelopment Project Area Plans Initial Study This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period for this negative declaration. The report reflects the independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth A venue, Chula Vista, CA 91910. ~]"~' Date: b Jfí rJL Planning & Environmental Services Manager 2 OS/29/02 / <C W 0:: <C t-) \ ' o " WI \v , -, Ic~\ \ \ o ,- 0> ~ ø", w....'" ë~3 \ \ ¡ I I Y I 0::\ ' zOO ~-~I a.\~\~U ill I , t- ':i \j Z~) I .í'rlI\<Q p,'-J . Wç~ \ ~ .---'. I Q. ,~I . O~' .---í- ....I ~ . W\ t: ,;\, I > I W , 'ò\<oP,Q'fJ"''' c- I W~I c=: I- 11 en W L ~ J: t-~ =» / i 0 i! "'.... en S;Z :3~ ::>~ :1:", ....Z 0 Reviewing Agencies Checklist KEY S = Document sent by lead agency _Resources Agency X = Document sent by SCH ~ating & WateN'ays ./ = SuggesLed distribution _Coastal Commission _Coastal Conservancy - Colorado Ri vcr Board Environmental Affairs Conservation - Air Resources Board ../ Fish & Game APCD/AQMD Forestry 7 California Waste Management Board 7 Office of Historic Preserv,won - SWRCB: Clean Water Grants ~Parks & Recreation SWRCB: Delta Unit - Reclam;¡tion 1SWRCB: Water QualilY _S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Commission _SWRCB: WaLer Rights _Water Resources (DWR) _Regional WQCB # ( ) Business, Transportation & Housing Youth & Adult Corrections - Aeronauocs Corr~tions - _Califorrua Highwayparrol Independent Commissions & Offices ~CALTRANS Disoict# i! ,Änergy Commission _Depanment of Transporution Planning (h03dqU:lI1ers) . Naùve American HeriL.1gc Commission _Housing & Community [Y.:velopmcnl Public Utiliùes Commission - _Food & Agriculture Santa Monica h-1ounlJ.Íns Cons.::--..:mcy Health & Welfare 7 Sl.11C Lwds Commission - H<::1Jth Serviœs _Tahoe Region;¡] Planning Agen:y State & Consumer Services General Services - Other - -.LOLA (Schools) ----------------------------------------- Public Review Peri d (to be filled in by l03d agency) Ending Dale July 22, 2002 Si ~, Date /~/l f' .:;Jò, 20"-'"2 Ú ' ---------------------------------- lead Agency (Complete if applicable): ¡vIA For SCH Use Only: Consulting Finn: Date Received at SCH Addr=: Date Review SL'lrtS Cily/State(Zip: Date to Agencies Contact: Date to SCH Phone:L--J Clearance Date Notes,' Applicant: City of Chula Vista Address: 276 Fourth Avenue City/State(Zip: Chula Vista, CA 91910 --. ~LJ~L\~Þ \~ ~~~s ~~f? G ~'?-, \ ad- ~~~~ - - -- ~- -~ ellY OF CHUIA VISTA NOTIFICACION DE UNA PROPUESTA DECLARACION NEGATIVA (DETERMINACION DE NO SIGNIFICATIVO IMPACTO AMBIENTAL) NOTIFICACION HE AQUI SE DA que la Ciudad de Chula Vista esta considerando una recommendacion que el proyecto identificado aqui no tendra impacto significativo en el ambiente en cumplimiento con la Seccion 15070 dellas leyes del estado sobre CEQA. Una copia de esta Declaracion Negativa(determinacion) esta archivada en el departamento de Community Development Deparnnent, Legislative Building, 430 Davidson Street, Suite B, Chula Vista, CA. 919m Este documento esta disponible para el publico dentro de las horas 8;00 a.m. y 5;00 p,m., Lunes a Viernes. Cualquier persona que desee comentar sobe la propuesta Declaracion Negativa debera proveer sus comentarios por escrito a Chula Vista Community Development Deparnnent en la siguiente; 276 Fourth Avenue, C.V. CA. 91910 para el22 de Julio, 2002. Esta determinacion no constituye aprobacion or negacion del proyecto en sie; solo determina si el proyecto podra tener impactos significativos al ambiente. Para proyectos que puedan tener impactos significativos al ambiente se debera preparar un Reporte de Impactos Ambientales con el fin de evaluar los possible impactos en cumplimiento con Seccion 15064 de las leyes de CEQA del Estado. Si usted de sea cuestionar la accion de la Ciudad sobre esta Declaracion Negativa en corte, posiblemente estara limitado ha hablar sobre asuntos que usted 0 otra persona haya hecho solo por escrito dentro del tiempo y lugar indicado. Para mas informacion, incluyendo informacion sobre futures juntas 0 sesiones, por favor de ponerse en contacto con Miguel Tapia al (619) 691-52910 Benjamin Guerrero al (619) 476-5311. Esta Notificacion se require que se archive con la oficina del County Clerk's por un periodo no menos de treinta (30) dias. NUMERO DEL ASESOR: Varios PROYECTO LOCALIZADO: Por favor ver el mapa; Ciudad de Chula Vista. DESCRIPCION DE PROYECTO: Enmienda al Area de Proyecto Sudoeste de Desarrollo extendiendo la provision de Dominio eminente del estado al 27 de Noviembre, 2014, AUTORIDAD DE MANDATARIO: Agencia de Desarrollo (Ciudad deChula Vista) INITIAL STUDY NO, (#de Archivo): IS-02-048 J:IHcmeICOO1TIDev\GuerreroIPubDc lIIOOœs\N(XjCt.ß', <.µJ>edNE GDEC Chula Vista Elementary School District Ms, Dianne Russo, Director of Fiscal Services Sweetwater Authority Sweetwater Union High School District 505 Garrett Avenue 84 East J Street 1130 Fifth Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 Chula Vista CA 91910-6199 Chula Vista, CA 91911-2896 Southwestern Community College Ms, Anne Marie Yang Ms, Suzanne Chambers Metropolitan Water District of Southern Otay Water District Attn: Finance Director California 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd, 900 Otay Lakes Road PO Box 54153, Terminal Annex Spring Valley CA 91977 Chula Vista CA 91910 Los Angeles CA 90054-0153 Mr Thomas E, Robinson Mr, James Munson, Controller Mr, Bob Graves Director of Facility Planning Services San Diego County Water Authority San Diego Unified Port District San Diego County Office of Education 4677 Overland Avenue PO Box 120488 6401 Linda Vista Road, Room 506 San Diego CA 92123 San Diego CA 92112 San Diego CA 92111-7399 Mr Ed Ryan Southbay Irrigation County of San Diego Finance Director, Auditor/Controller 505 Garrett Avenue 3989 Ruffin Road City of San Diego Chula Vista CA 91910 San Diego CA 92123 202 'C' Street, Suite 9B San Diego CA 92101 \-\-\B"~ k~~(E:Ç ~ ~,,-,\ KJ D\\L~ 6F rø"~ë?O tj~~'-J E- 'DECL0\2ATlov /+Nt::> A--Copy OP NEc-AT\ '-'E \)t::éL-f'> \2-1\\i OW D 6CU \iY\ 'ËI"I, \WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLKFIB4\taxingagcylabels.doc Case No.IS-02-048 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Name of Proponent: City of Chula Vista 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth A venue Chula Vista, CA 91910 3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 276 Fourth A venue Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 691-5291 4. Name of Proposal: Fourth Amendment to the Southwest Redevelopment Plan to extend Eminent Domain Authority 5. Date of Checklist: May 30, 2002 Potmliaßy Pot~tia1!y Signifkaot Less than Significant U..... S¡pincant No lmpKI Mitigattd Impact Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? 0 0 0 I> b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 0 I> policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e,g., 0 0 0 I> impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an 0 0 0 I> established community (including a low-income or minority community)? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to land use, lndirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time, Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista, Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required, The approval of this extension would not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community , 1 5/30/02 Potentially Potentially Sigamcanl Lou tha. Significant U..... Slgnlßcant N. Impact Mitigated Impact Impact Mitigation: None II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 181 population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly 0 0 0 181 or indirectly (e,g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 181 housing? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to population and housing. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its eminent domain authority and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain authority, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None III. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic 0 0 0 181 substructures? b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or 0 0 0 181 overcovering of the soil? c) Change in topography or ground surface relief 0 0 0 181 features? d) The destruction, covering or modification of any 0 0 0 181 unique geologic or physical features? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, 0 0 0 181 either on or off the site? t) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, 0 0 0 181 or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay inlet or lake? g) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards 0 0 0 181 such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground 2 5/30/02 PoteDdall, PoteDtlall, Sipißcant Lou""'n Slpif"KaDt u,,¡'" SignificaDt Nn Impoct Mitigated Impoct Impact failure, or similar hazards? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to ground surface or geologic conditions. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its eminent domain authority and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain authority, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or 0 0 0 181 the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related 0 0 0 181 hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of 0 0 0 181 surface water quality (e,g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 181 water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of 0 0 0 181 water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 181 through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 0 0 0 181 h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 181 i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? 0 0 0 181 j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water 0 0 0 181 otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to water resources. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its eminent domain authority and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result 3 5/30/02 PotenliaU,. PoceutiaUy Significant Less tban Significant Unless Sl&IIlfkanl No Impo" Mitigated Impact Impact cof the extension of eminent domain authority, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further eenvironmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, LZoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City cof Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from aany responsible public agency would also be required. !\Mitigation: None W. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an 0 0 0 ¡¡; existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 ¡¡; c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0 0 0 ¡¡; cause any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d) Create objectionable odors? 0 0 0 ¡¡; e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or non- 0 0 0 ¡¡; stationary sources of air emissions or the deterioration of ambient air quality? (Comments: Tfhe proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The eextension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the eenvironment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to Air Quality. ¡indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future ëacquisition of property through its eminent domain authority and subsequent development are too sspeculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result oof the extension of eminent domain authority, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further eenvironmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, LZoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City cof Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from aany responsible public agency would also be required. !\Mitigation: None 'VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 ¡¡; b) Hazards to safety from design features (e,g., sharp 0 0 0 ¡¡¡¡ curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e,g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby 0 0 0 ¡¡; uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? 0 0 0 ¡¡¡¡ e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 0 ¡¡; 4 5/30/02 PottnliaUy PottntiaUy Significant Less than SlgnmcaDt Unless SigDincanl No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 0 0 0 181 f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 181 h) A "large project" under the Congestion 0 0 0 181 Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips.) Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to the city's transportation or circulation system. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its eminent domain authority and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain authority, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said project would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required, Mitigation: None VII, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of concern 0 0 0 181 or species that are candidates for listing? b) Locally designated species (e,g., heriœge trees)? 0 0 0 181 c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak 0 0 0 181 forest, coasœl habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e,g., marsh, riparian and vernal 0 0 0 181 pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 181 f) Affect regional habitat preservation planning 0 0 0 181 efforts? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to biological resources. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its eminent domain authority and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain authority, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said project would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, 5 5/30/02 PotenttaUy PotenHally S'¡gaif"lCant Less than Signiracant u."" Signinc.ant N. Impact Mitigated Impact hnpaet Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Contlict with adopted energy conservation plans? 0 0 0 C!iI b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 C!iI inefficient manner? c) If the site is designated for mineral resource 0 0 0 C!iI protection, will this project impact this protection? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to energy or mineral resources. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time, Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review, Said project would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None IX, HAZARDS, Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 C!iI hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response 0 0 0 C!iI plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 C!iI health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential 0 0 0 C!iI health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with tlammable 0 0 0 C!iI brush, grass, or trees? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority, The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any creation or exposure of humans or 6 5/30/02 PotmtiaUy PoteDtå.lUy Si~nt Less tban Significant UoIou SignlrKIIDt N. Impact Mitigated Impact Impact animal species to hazardous situations. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required, Mitigation: None X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 0 Ii! b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 Ii! Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant noise impacts. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said project would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None XI, PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 Ii! b) Police protection? 0 0 0 Ii! c) Schools? 0 0 0 Ii! d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 0 0 0 Ii! e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 Ii! Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to public services, Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further 7 5/30/02 PoteJItlaÐy PoteDtbUy Sigu.mc:lDt Less thaD SigDifJCaDt Un.... Signif)(&Dt No Impact Mitig:ated Impact Impact environmental review. Said project would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and an applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with an applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. No new or altered governmental services will be required for this project. Mitigation: None XII. Thresholds, Will the proposal adversely impact the 0 0 0 181 City's Threshold Standards? As described below, the proposed project does not significantly impact any of the seven Threshold Standards. a) Fire/EMS 0 0 0 181 The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to cans within 7 minutes or less in 85 % of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75 % of the cases. Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to fire rescue or emergency medical services. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review, Said project would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and an applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with an applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required, Mitigation: None b) Police 0 0 0 181 The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84 % of Priority I cans within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to an Priority I cans of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 cans within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to an Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to police services. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time, Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said project would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and an applicable codes, conditions, ordinances and regulations and procedures of the 8 5/30/02 Potentia1J1 Potentially S'agnlfkant Uss tban Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None c) Traffic 0 0 0 ~ Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the enviromnent; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to the city's traffic system, Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required, Mitigation: None d) Parks/Recreation 0 0 0 ~ Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the enviromnent; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to parks or recreational resources. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further enviromnental review. Said project would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances and regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None e) Drainage 0 0 0 t!I The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority, The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to city's drainage 9 5/30/02 Poteøtially Potentially Slgnlßcant Less than Signlficant U""" Slgnllkant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact system. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review, Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None t) Sewer 0 0 0 C!i The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to the city's sewer resources. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. No sewer facilities or services are required to serve this project. Therefore, no conflict with the City's threshold is anticipated. Mitigation: None g) Water 0 0 0 C!i The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and those water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building pennit issuance. Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority . The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to water resources. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time, Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances and regulations and procedures of the 10 5/30/02 PotenttaUy Potentian, Significant Less tban Sl~irtca.at Unless Slgnlfka.at No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. No water service is required for this project Therefore, no conflict with the City's threshold is anticipated, Mitigation: None XIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS, Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 181 b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 181 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 181 facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 181 e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 181 f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 181 Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to utility and service systems. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. The proposed project would not require new systems to be installed, or alterations of existing utilities. Mitigation: None XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the 0 0 0 181 public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? b) Cause the destruction or modification of a scenic 0 0 0 181 route? c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 181 d) Create added light or glare sources that could 0 0 0 181 increase the level of sky glow in an area or cause this project to fail to comply with Section 19,66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 19? 11 5/30/02 PottntbD, Pottntlall, Significant Less tban Significant Un"" Significant Nn Impact Mitigattd Impact Impact e) Reduce an additional amount of spill light? 0 0 0 II Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to aesthetic resources. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista, Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required, Mitigation: None XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES, Would the proposal: a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the 0 0 0 II destruction or a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or 0 0 0 II aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a 0 0 0 II physical change that would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or 0 0 0 II sacred uses within the potential impact area? e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan 0 0 0 II ElR as an area of high potential for archeological resources? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to cultural resources, Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None 12 5/30/02 PotentiaU, PotentiaU, Signmcanl Less than Significanl Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impacl XVI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the 0 0 0 ø proposal result in the alteration of or the destrnction of paleontological resources? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to paleontological resources, Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time, Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review, Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None XVII. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional 0 0 0 ø parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 ø c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation plans 0 0 0 ø or programs? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts' to recreational resources, Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain power, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required, Mitigation: None XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declaration for mandatory findings of significance. If an EIR is needed, this section should be completed. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the 0 0 0 ø quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining 13 5/30/02 pot~ptianJ Pot~ptiall1 Si~ifkaPI Less tbap Significant Unless Slgnitkant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods or California history or prehistory? Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing eminent domain authority. The extension of existing eminent domain power will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts to sensitive plant or animal communities. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its power of eminent domain and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain authority, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said project would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. Mitigation: None b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 181 short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Comments: Extending the existing eminent domain authority of the city would not significantly affect the long-term environmental goals of the City of Chula Vista, c) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 0 181 limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Comments: The proposed project only extends the Redevelopment Agency's existing power of eminent domain. The extension of existing eminent domain authority will not result in any direct physical changes to the environment; therefore, the proposed project will not result in any significant cumulative impacts. Indirect physical changes resulting in land use impacts as a result of the Redevelopment Agency's future acquisition of property through its eminent domain authority and subsequent development are too speculative to analyze at this time. Any redevelopment projects, which may occur in the future as a result of the extension of eminent domain authority, would, at the time of proposal, be subject to further environmental review. Said projects would also be required to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and all applicable codes, conditions, ordinances, regulations and procedures of the City of Chula Vista. Compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and with any approval from any responsible public agency would also be required. 14 5/30/02 PotmtiaUy Potenti:aUy SigDirJCant Less than SignirlCant u..... SlgDirlCant N. hnpact Mitigatt'd Impact Impact Mitigation: None d) Does the project have environmental effects that 0 0 0 ¡; will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: No substantial significant effects on human beings would result from extending the city's existing eminent domain authority. XIX, PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES: NONE REQillRED XX. AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT MITIGATION MEASURES NO MITIGATION MEASURES REQillRED XXI. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: NONE CHECKED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages, D Land Use and Planning D Transportation/Circulation D Public Services D Population and Housing D Biological Resources D Utilities and Service Systems D Geophysical D Energy and Mineral Resources D Aesthetics D Water D Hazards D Cultural Resources D Air Quality D Noise D Recreation D Paleontology D Mandatory Findings of Significance 15 5/30/02 XXII. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, . and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, 0 there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MA Y have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at 0 least one effect: I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impacts" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 0 (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project An addendum has been prepared to provide a record of this determination, J)þ«=-~~ Date May 29, 2002 Signature Brian Hunter Planning & Environmental Services Manager City of Chula Vista 16 5/30/02 Notice of Completion Fonn A SCH # Su NOTE bdow Mail/a: Slate Clearinghouse, 1400 Tcnth SlrCC~ SJcramcnlO, CA 95814 916/445-û613 ProJoct Title: Extending Eminent Domain Authority Lead Agoncy: City of Chula Vista Contact Pe~on: Bri an Hunter Street Address: 276 Fourth Ave Phone: (619) 691-5016 City: Chula Vista Zip: 91910 County: San Di ego ;~~~~~----SEEATTACHEDMAP----------------------- ro DC Dca on County: San Diego Ciry!NcJ:fcs[ Community: City of Chula Vista Cross Streets: Various Zip Code: 91911 Total Acres: 1,100 Various ", 18S IE Base:S.B.B.M. Assessor's Puce1 No. Se.ction: vanous Twp, Range: Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 15/1805 Waterw<ays: San Diego Bay Air¡xms: None Rai1ways: SO&E Schools: Various ----------------------------------------- Document Type CEOA: ONOP o Supplement/Subsequent NEPA: DNOI Other: o Joint Document o Early Cons o EIR (Prior SCH No,) DEA o Final Document o Neg Dee o Other D Draft EIS o Other o Draft EIR D FONSI ----------------------------------------- Local Action Type o Genera! Plan Update o Specifie Pi"" o Rewnc: o Annexaûon o Genera! Plan Amendrm:nt o Master PI." o Prerone o Redevelopment D Genera! Plan Element o Planned Unit Development o Use P=.Ü D C03S~1tc:mit [j Community PI." o Site Plan o Land Division (Subdivi..sion. ~ Other X tend i ng PareclM.p.TraClM.p,e:c.) Eminent Domain Authority ----------------------------------------- Dovolopment Type o Resid..."u:ù: UniJs Acra o Wa~r Facilities: Type /.fGD o Office: SqJ!. Acra Employ~a o Tramp:>rtJtion: Type " Com:r.=ia!: Sqft. Acres Emplayecs o Minin.: .Hj~ral LJ Indust:iJl: Sqft· Acra Employea o Power: Type Walts U Educational o Wa:s~ Tre.:1tm~nt; Type U RCCTC3[jO "..JJ o Ha=dous W85!C: Type ŒjOthc::Administratlve ~Ollce AutnOrltv ----------------------------------------- ProJoct Issuos Dlscussod In Document o Aesthetier.ïsuaJ o Rood PiainlFJoodin. o SchoolslUruversities o Water Qu:ùity o AgriculQlr"1 Land o Forest LandJFirc Hazard o Septic Systems o Water Supply/Groundwater o Air Qua!i!:' o Ge.ologic/Scismic: o Sewer Capacity o WetlandIRiparian o Arehcolo¡;i=:ù/Historic:ù o Minc:a!s o Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading o Wildl¡re o C085tal Z::-,~ o Noise o Solid W85te o GrowÙ1lnduc:ing o DrainageJ.~~S( rption o PopulationJHousing Balance: D Toric/Haz.ardous o Landuse o Economicflcbs o Public Services/Facilities o Traffic/Circu1aûon o Cumulative Effects o Fisca! o Rcc:e.,¡ion/Parks o Vcgetation o Other Admi n i strat i ve Action ----------------------------------------- Present L,nd Us.elZonlng/General Plan Use Various ----------------------------------------- Project Description Amendment to Southwest Redevelopment Project area plan extending the provision of Eminent Demain Authority to November 27, 2014 "'"'!:?NT ~I2N\Gf'rT (VI A-t L- . ~,. ..:> LVlTt\ ~ ~ 1 5 Co¡?le?) q:(\JC=G.Î)fiC. NOTE:CJemnghouse willassignidcnuficalion numbers for all new projccIS, If fH number a e y exisISforaprojcc'(e.g. from aNoticcofPreparauon or previous draft document) please fill it in. N pN () . r:,..::~",_-! (1:t,,,,.h~ !O~O 41 Reviewing Agencies Checklist KEY S = Document sent by lead agency _Resources AIJency X = Document sent by SCH ~ating & Waterv..a)'s ./ = Suggesu:d distribution _Coastal Commission _Coastal Conservancy - Colorado Ri ver Board Environmental AffaIrs Conservation - Air Resources Board ,/ Fish & Game APCD/AQMD Forestry 7 California Waste Management Board 7 Office of Historic Preservation - SWRCB: Clean Water Grants ~Parks & Recreation SWRCB: DeI14 Unit - Reclamation ~SWRCB: Water Quality _S.F. Ba)' Conservation & Development Commission _SWRCB: Water Rights _Water Resources (DWR) _Regional WQCB # ( ) BusIness, Transportation & HouslnlJ Youth & Adult Corrections - Aeronautics - Corre<:tions _California Highway Patrol Independent Commissions & Offices ~CALTR}J~S District # ¡I ,~nerg)' Commission , _Deparunent of Transport.1tion Planning (headquarters) , Native American Heritage Commission _Housing & Community Development Public Utilities Commission - _Food & AIJrlculture San[;J Monica Moun[;Jins Cons::,vancy Health & Welfare 7 s~ Lands Commission - Hc:¡]th Services _Tahoe Regional Pbnning Agcccy State & Consumer Services Gener.l! Services - Other - --LOLA (Schools) ----------------------------------------- Public Review Peri d (to be filled in by lead agency) Ending Date July 22, 2002 Si Date i¿;/J r" ';;ò, )0'/2 Ú ' ---------------------------------- lead Agency (Complete if applicable): ;V)A For SCH Use Only: Consulting Firm: Date Rocei vcd at SCH Address: Date Review Starts Cily/S[;JtefZip: Date to Agencies Cont;¡ct: Date to SCH Phone:L-J Clearance Date Notes: Applicant: City of Chula Vista Address: 276 Fourth Avenue Cily/SU1tefZip: Chula Vista, CA 91910 -- 0 ~@L¡SJ~D (IV ~~~ '3Tf\rL NÞ.~s 6jé)(fo"à. =~~-~ ...¿:~~~ ~~-~ cm OF CHULA VISfA NOTICE OF PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRO~Ì\'IENTAL IMPACT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Chula Vista is considering a recommendation that the project herein identified will have no significant environmental impact in compliance with Section 15070 of State CEQA guidelines. A copy of me Negative Declaration (findings) is on file in me Chula Vista Community Development Department, Legislative Building, 430 Davidson Street, Suite B, Chula Vista, CA. 91910. This document is available for public review between me hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Anyone wishing to comment on me proposed Negative Declaration should provide their written comments to the Chula Vista Community Development Department at the following address: 276 Founh Avenue, C.V. CA, 91910 by Julv 22. 2002, This proposed finding does not constitute approval or denial of the project itself; it QI}!y determines if the project could have significant environmental impact. Projects which could have significant impact must have an Environmental Impact Report prepared to evaluate those possible impacts in compliance with Section 15064 of State CEQA Guidelines, If you wish to challenge the City's action on the Negative Declaration in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in "'Tinen correspondence. For further information concerning this project, including public hearing dates, please contact Brian Hunter at (619) 691-5016 or Benjamin Guerrero at (619) 476-531 L This Notice is required to be filed with the County Clerk's office for a period of not less than thirty (30) days. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUl\ffiER: Various PROJECT LOCATION: Please see attached map; City of Chula Vista. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Amendment to Southwest Redevelopment Project Area Plan extending the provision of eminent domain authority to November 27, 2014. DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY: Redevelopment Agency (City of Chula Vista) INITIAL STUDY NO.: IS-02-048 J:\HaT1e\COl111OEN\GuemrolPUbnc NdjœsINctjœctPrq:xJSedNEG D E C '7 ,-- ; , z~ n ~ê "'S:; 0< z- ' '^ ~_ w. ,. 0 II c: ~~ :I: q I ::E " II > ~ , ~ r \ ;;:¡ . \ m -0 :-cJ¡i>o,,¡O\)'ò \ \ \ \ m , " é \\ \' < , ' ' , ,c , " ,," -, \ F< _ ,_ ' \ " ,\ '. \" \ \ ;. \;, ---I m , ,~ ,,0' ~ ~ ~ ,~ C' ,""",- '",.-"{j, ,c \, r- \,_ _cê= ,~ ' ' \",' ",' ,~O ,\ ' ' - -,"~ , ",,' \,' " "", \ \ \ ' í.!' "J L-111%fBllll ~,\ '- c , '", I, ' , ",..Y ~ .. ' ' ¡II I "I ,,- - , ' \./ "" , " ,c:--- ' _, ' ,I L.." " íD LU I ' I' ,< ",,(D', " \ " \ š:: III I '--¡:::Jl l' ' ____ \ '.----;-\ \ ------ m , H ' ,,, 1-; ? ' I ,< 0""'\ \--... \-.---- Z I II ' I != I ~ : \ \ \.--- , ~ I \\,~~ I II I' _ _ \::::::=-:---' : n ~' \~' \ [5] I_I ,'/' ~' ,~I'~...-" '. " , ,'¡ n< \ ~-a , ~ " I ________" "noz , .1J. II, II~' ,~\ O"O~! " ~ 0 \ <::0 1 ;;:¡ W' Illillllll) ~'\ \' Î'''¡\~h~ ",§ ~e 1.lJ = \\ \, \ ' , ; , \ \ U hT2' /':"" ,< ,siÍ'~' /\ \ m I ~ ~\ \ 'i \ í -------- () I' -- II U 'ii; -'í '. ~è,' '.' \ _ lj,f'-Y\\'\ ~ ~ _ ' , I o~ ~ ,,0 ;0'\"" ~ _ I ,---j:;; \ '\' _ ' \' :Þ ~z \,ý' \ '" ;;:¡ , ~ ~_ YC' _\\ '!},. m I ' :Þ - 01 I o 0 i ~I:;¡ ::1 0 ~.'j ~I~= , ~I¡;' ; !2 s ê1š! /