HomeMy WebLinkAboutRCC AGENDA PK 2003/07/30
DRAFT
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
^pril 21Julv 30,2003 I
Acknowledgements
City of Chula Vista:
Duane E. Bazzel, Principal Planner
Frank J, Herrera-A, Associate Planner
Mary Hofmockel, Principal Landscape Architect
John Krizan, Landscape Architect
Nancy Ross, Geographic Information System Specialist
Todd Schmit, Landscape Architect
Chapin Land Management, Inc.
Peggy Gentry, Project Manager
Kelly Ballard, Research
Liz Sears, Graphics
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft April2-1July 30, 2003 I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Chapter 1 . Purpose and Need 4
11 Purpose of Plan 4
12 Need for Master Plan 6
U Components of the Greenbelt
~lntroduGtion 1
Chapter 1 Purpose and Need 3
U Purpese of Plan 3
12 Noed for Master Plan 5
1-3 Components of the-Gfeenbelt 8
Chapter 2 - Existinq Conditions 12
2,1 Historical Context 12
22 Local and Reqional Settinq 12
2.3 Relationship to Other Local and Reqional Plans 13
Chapter 3 . Goals and Policies 16
Chapter 4 - Desicm Criteria and Standards 19
4,1 Trail Types 20
4,U General Standards 21
4,12 Trail Surface 21
4,U Multi-use Trail 21
4,lA Rural Trail 24
4,1,5 Special Trail Desiqn Criteria 26
4,2 Greenbelt Desiqn 28
42,1 Greenbelt Siqns 28
422 Staqinq Areas 32
42,3 Site Furnishinqs 34
42A Accessibility Guidelines 35
425 Fencinq 35
42.6 Arterial Crossinqs 37
42,7 Standard Urban Storm Water Mitiqation 37
Plan Requirements
4.3 Greenbelt Manaqement and Maintenance 38
4,3,1 Greenbelt Manaqement 38
4,32 Greenbelt Maintenance 42
4.3.3 User Conflicts
44Chapter 2 Existin!! Conditions 10
2,1 Historioal Context 10
22 LeGal and Regienal Setting 10
2,3 Relationship to Other LOGal and Regienal Plans 11
Chapter 3 Goals and PoliGies H
Chapter 1 Desi!!R Criteria and Standards 17
11
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft~Apr¡¡"21Juiy 30, 2003 I
4,1 Trail Types 17
4, 1, 1 Geneml ðt:mdards 17
4, 12Trail ðurfBce 18
4, 1 ,3Multi use Tmil 18
4,1,4RumITrail 21
4,1 ,5ðpeci31 Tmil Design Criteri3 23
42 Groonbolt Design 25
42,1 Greonbolt ðigns 25
42,2 ðtnging /\reas . 29
42,3 ~o Furnishings 31
42,4 .^,ooessibility Guidelines 32
42J; Fenoing 32
42,5/\rterial Cressings 34
42,7 ðtnndard Urbnn Sterm '.^inter Mitigation 34
Plnn Requirements
~" Greenbelt"Mnnngement and Mnintennnce 35
0,1 Groonbelt Management -ðã
02 Greenbelt Mnintennnce 38
-- 4,3,3" User Conflicts 39
Chapter 5 . The Plan 46
5,1 Plannina Approach and Methodoloay 46
5,2 Seament and Trail Descriptions 46
52,1 Lower Sweetwater Seament 46
522 Sweetwater Reaional Park Seament 48
52,3 San Miauel Seqment 50
5,2A Salt Creek Seament 52
52,5 Otay Lakes Seament 53
52,6 Otay Valley Reaional Park, East and West Seqments 54
52,7 Otay Ranch Villaqe Greenway Seament 55
52,8 Bavfront Seament 58
5,3 Greenbelt SummarY 59
5A Greenbelt Maps 62Chaptor 5
The Plan 42
8,1 Plnnning /\pproach and Methodology 42
52 Segment nnd Trail Descriptions 42
52,1 Lower Swoetwater ðogment 42
522 Sweotwntor Regional Park Segment 43
5,2,3 San Miguel Segmont 4§
52,4 Snit Creek Segment 17
52.5 Otny Lakes Segmont 48
5,2,6 Otay Vnlloy Regional Parl\, East and 'Nest Segment~ 49
52-7 Otay RancR Villnge Creenway Segment 50
52,8 Bayfront Segment 52
5,ð Trail Segment ðUmmar¡ 53
5,4 Greenbelt Maps 54
Chapter 6 - Implementation 63
6,1 Publicly & Privatelv Owned Open Space 63
6,1-1 Publicly Owned Open Space 63
6,12 Privatelv Owned Open Space 64
62 Acauisition, Development and Maintenance Fundina 64
62,1 Acauisition of Greenbelt Open Space and Trails 64
III
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApril2-1Julv 30, 2003 I
622 Desian and Construction Fundina 66
6.2,3 Maintenance Fundina 67
Chapter 7 - Consultation 69
Sources Consulted and Persons Interviewed 69
Greenbelt Maps 70
Tables
Table 1 - Trail Standards 25
Table 2 - Grade Separated Roadwav Crossinas 37
Table 3 - Estimate of Probablv Costs 42
Table 4 - Recommended Maintenance Schedule 43
Table 5 - Trail Seament Characteristics 60Chapter 6
Implementation 58
6,1 Publicly &. Privately Owned Open Space 58
6,1-1 PUBlicly Owned Open Space 58
€U2 Privately Owned Open Space 59
6,2 /\cquisition, Development and Maintenance Funding- 59
-- 62,1 /\cquisition of Greenbelt Open Space [md Trails 59
622 Design and Construction Funding 61
62,3 Maintonance Funding 62
Chapter 7 Consultation 61
Seurces Consulted and Persons Interviewed 64
Greenbelt Segment Maps 66
+abies
Table 1 Trail Standards 22
Table 2 Grade Separated Roadway Crossings 34
Table 3 Estimate of Probably Costs 37
+a9te-4--Recommended Maintenance Schedulo 39
Table 5 Trail Segmont Characteristics 54
FiQures
Fiaure 1 - Vicinitv Map 5
Fiaure 2 - General Plan Greenbelt 6
Fiaure 3 - Multi-use Trail / Rural Trail 23
Fiaure 4 - Greenbelt Trail Sian 29
Fiaure 5 - Trail Head Kiosk Concept 30
Fiaure 6 - Trail Sian Post 31
Fiaure 7 - Staaina Area without Eauestrian Facilities 33
Fiaure 8 - Staaina Area with Eauestrian Facilities 34
Fiaure 9 - Post and Rail Fence 36
Fiaure 10 - Greenbelt Jurisdictions & Aaencies 41
Fiaure 11 - Greenbelt Master Plan Map 72
Fiaure 12 - Lower Sweetwater Seament 73
Fiaure 13 - Sweetwater Reaional Park Seament 74
Fiaure 14 - San Miauel Seament 75
Fiaure 15 - Otav Lakes/Salt Creek Seaments 76
Fiaure 16 - Otav Vallev Reaional Park East & Otav Ranch Villaae Greenwav
Seaments 77
Fiaure 17 - Otav Vallev Reaional Park West Seament 78
IV
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Apr41-2-tJulv 30, 2003 I
Fiqure 18 - Bavfront Seqment 79
Fiqure 19 - Maintenance Map 80Figurec
Figure 1 Vicinity Map 1
Figure 2 Genoml Plan Greenbelt 5
Figure 3 Multi use Tmil 20
Figura 1 Ruml Tmil 20
Figura 5 Greenbelt Tmil Sign 26
Figure 6 Tmil Head Kiosk ConGept 27
Figure 7 Tmil Sign Post 28
Figure g staging /\rea without Equestri::m FaGilities 30
Figura 9 Staging Araa .....ith Equestrian Facilities 31
Figure 10 Post and Rail Fence 33
"igure 11 Greeneelt Master Plan Map 57
Figure 12 Lower Sweetwator Segment e7
Figura 13 S'.,>eet'Nater Regional Pari< Segment e8
Figure 11 San Miguel Segment eO
Figure 15 Otay Lakes/Salt Craek Segments 70
Figura 1 e Otay Valley Regional Pmk East g, Otay Ranch Villago Greenway
Segmonts 71
Figura 17 Otay Valley Regional Pmk West Segment 72
"igure 18 Sayfront Segment 73
Figure 1 0 Maintenance Map +4
v
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftAprj~:HJuly 30. 2003 I
Introduction
The Greenbelt is described in the City's General Plan as the backbone of an
open space and park system that extends throughout the city. Comprised
of a series of open space segments, the Greenbelt system will be connected by a
multi-use trail extending through each segment. Essentiallv. the Greenbelt
creates an open space border around the Citv. This Greenbelt is comprised of a
varietv of natural and parklike elements: from the channelized Sweetwater River.
alonq Qolf courses and banks of the Otav Lakes. followinq the Otav River vallev
to the Chula Vista BavfrontHarbor.
Each Greenbelt segment offers unique opportunities for passive and/or active
recreation that mav be connected bv a continuous trail system through the
Greeflbelt that may-be lost or seriously-feduced if each cegment is not identified.
RecoqnizinQ these opportunities within each seqment will serve to enhance and
preserve the benefits and natural amenities of the qreenbelt svstem, The intent
of this Plan is to identifv recognize where opportunities exist to create a trail
Fletv>'Ork so -tMt segments £-af1--Be developed·and plan to develop parks and trails
as funding becomes available or through the development of master planned
communities,
One of the kev components of the Greenbelt is the multi-use trail that serves to I
connect the parks and open space of each Greenbelt seqment. Trails are
defined as paths used for walking, bicycling, horseback riding or other forms of
recreation or transportation. For the purposes of the Greenbelt, there are two
general types of trails: Multi-use Trails and Rural Trails. Multi-Use trails are
trails designed for a variety of users, such as bicyclists, equestrians, pedestrians,
joggers, and other non-motorized activities. The Multi-use Trail may also be
improved with a variety of trail surfaces. Rural Trails provide access to natural
open space areas, and are designed to minimize impacts to natural resource
areas, limit access to maintenance and emergency vehicles, and may limit the
types of users depending on permitted uses in these resource areas.
The trails identified in this Master Plan represent both existing and proposed
trails. The Master Plan is not intended to show precise alignments or locations of
trail improvements, although as a result of master planned community design
efforts, some trail locations have been identified. Precise locations for other trail
segments will be developed on a case by case basis following appropriate
review, through the master planned communities design efforts, or as part of a
capital improvement project.
In the City's General Plan, the Greenbelt is divided into segments that roughly
follow the boundaries of the City along the Sweetwater River, Salt Creek and
Otay Lakes, Otay River Valley, and the San Diego Bay. The Greenbelt is not
entirely located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City. Portions of the
Greenbelt are located within the Cities of National City and San Diego, and the
1
City of Chula Vista
Greenbeit Master Plan
Final DraftApFiI-2~tJuly 30, 2003 I
County of San Diego and Port District. This document recognizes the need for
planning with the neighboring jurisdictions and the City will continue to work with
those agencies to cooperatively plan trail connections to ensure the Greenbelt's
continuity.
The process for developing this Master Plan included the following key steps:
· Identifvinq open space proqrams that comprise the qreenbelt svstem~:
· Evaluating the existinq Greenbelt svstem. existinq trails. proposed trails
within developinq communities. and related open space and trail planninq
documents:.
· Summarizing background information on the open space and regional
parks of the Greenbelt, and existing trails and proposed trails;, I
· Establishing goals of the Master Plan with supporting policies;. I
· Developing a physical plan showing recommended multi-use trails within
the Greenbelt,; I
· Establishing design guidelines for the amenities within the Greenbelt and
for the multi-use trail system: and., I
· Proposing an implementation program for the Greenbelt system.
This document serves as a planning tool to guide future planning decisions.
Specific actions and commitments can assure that in the future the entire
Greenbelt with interconnecting trails will be developed through commitments by
the City and the adjacent jurisdictions, pursuing funding mechanisms, and
through sensitive and flexible design criteria~ The Greenbelt Master Plan is
divided into the following chapters:
Chapter 1: Purpose and Need
Why the Greenbelt Master Plan has been prepared, the need for a
master plan, and who will use the Greenbelt trail system?
Chapter 2: Existing Conditions
Where are the existing Greenbelt segments, what trails have been
planned and where they are located?
Chapter 3: Goals and Policies
What goals and policies guide the development of the Greenbelt?
Chapter 4: Design Criteria and Standards
What types of trails will be constructed, are there additional
2
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-A¡>Fi~~o¡.Juty 30, 2003 I
amenities that will be provided and what signs will be installed that
will provide recognition and guidance to trail users?
Chapter 5 The Plan
Ultimately, where are the existing and future Greenbelt segments
and what trails will be located within each Greenbelt?
Chapter 6: Implementation
What actions need to occur to accomplish the goals of the plan?
Chapter 7: Consultation
Sources Consulted and Persons Interviewed
3
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft"AprH-2tJulv 30, 2003 I
Chapter 1
Purpose and Need
.
The City of Chula Vista has grown rapidly achieving the status as the second
largest city in the San Diego region (See Figure 1). This rapidly growing, diverse
community has a population estimated at 200,000. Over time, the City's N:, tho I
City h:Js grown, its leaders have recognized the value of open space and the
importance of preserving the natural environment, while also understanding that
both open space and trails are important to the quality of life of a diverse
community. This document is a Master Plan for the greenbelt system
surrounding the City and -the trails that are an essential component of the I
greenbelt.
1.1 Purpose of Plan
The Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (pp.1-42) discusses the
concept, describes the major components, and includes a diagram of the
physical layout of the Greenbelt The General Plan states, "to assure a
coordination of planning for all components of the Chula Vista Greenbelt, an
overall master plan is recommended."
The Greenbelt Master Plan (referred to in this document as the Plan) provides
guidance and continuity for planning open space and constructing and
maintaining trails that encircle the City. The Plan's primary purpose is to provide
goals and policies, trail design standards, and implementation tools that guide
the creation of a Greenbelt System connected bv a svstem of multi-use trails
through ~on cp:Jco CorŀlefS" Implementation Bf-tlhe Greenbelt system will
creates an identity for the City while unifying the westem and eastorn areae of
tho City, Chula Vista" The multi-use trail system is an integral component of the
Greenbelt as it links each seQment tho opon spaco corridors that compriso tho
Groonbolt Each of the Greenbelt segments offers unique challenges to
implementing the Plan, ConsultlillLatioo-with State and Federal guidelines
regarding accessibility will be required prior to final trail design and construction.
The Greenbelt Master Plan serves as a flexible, comprehensive, and long-range
planning document It is a guide for identifying significant open space areas
within the Greenbelt and potential multi-use trails and is a tool for planning and
developing the entire Greenbelt svstem" afIEI-#1€--ffiHlti uco tr3i1s ,....ithin tho
Greonbolt eystofff,
4
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft April-2-1Julv 30, 2003 I
5
City of ChuJa Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft--Ä¡}r-i1-2-1Julv 30, 2003 I
~
~N'IY
RIVEiÞ:!IDt.~
~rnE!(;;o~
AAUMOOK
.
_R~~$
N DIEGO
"0
'ñ
'f\
~
~
I'!\CjFIC
ç~
·k
'~
CHULA VISTÀ%
GREEN BEL T E;':ìi<:l=<:::>
~
NO I~ALr
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
6
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApFil2-1Julv 30, 2003 I
Figure 2
General Plan Greenbelt
1.2 Need for a Greenbelt Master Plan I
The Citv of Chula Vista's Parks Master Plan states that providinq well planned
leisure opportunities is one of the qreatest challenqes in the 21st century,
Survevs conducted bv the Citv to determine public interest and commitment in
parks facilities was conducted in 1995 and 1996 and updated in 2000 (Chula
Vista Parks and Recreation Master Plan), The survev resulted in the recoqnition
that 75% of the residents use tAe-Citv parks and that the key proqrams desired
areõ outdoor court facilities. plavinq fields. and bikinq and ioqqinq paths,
Protection of linear corridors and open space networks is vital to providing
access to scenic areas, parks, and other public or non-public recreation.
Connectinq these open space corridors for public access requires preservinq
corridors for trails, Protection of the trail corridors requires identification of trail
corridor!>, coordination with property owners for trail development, and active
public support for trails.
The Greenbelt itself provides visual and environmental benefits. Incorporating a
trail throughout the Greenbelt will continue to ensure the feeling of open space, I
7
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApril-2-1Julv 30, 2003 I
aM-protection of habitat. and providinq for public access to the Greenbelt. Trails I
provide a relatively inexpensive form of recreation for the general public as well
as prove to be an asset to the community and increase propertv values. Other I
benefits are more individualized for the user. Trail users realize improved health,
increased fitness, convenient access to the outdoors, and a diversified selection
of recreational opportunities.
Connectinq each Greenbelt seqment will result in achievinq one of the most
desired recreation amenities for communities, Tr-ails-Bfe--strongly-suppDfted
throughout California. The 1993 California Outdoor Recreation Plan states that
88% of the public participated in walking, 55% in hiking, 31 % in jogging or
running, 46% in biking on paved surfaces, 15% in mountain bicycling and 15% in
horseback riding. Urban and suburban development continues to diminish
available open space; frequently severing trail corridors used for trail purposes,
but never formally designated as public trails. However, the demand for non-
motorized trails is increasing. The 1991 Harris Poll cited studies that showed
54% of Americans would cycle if they had safe, separate designated paths on
which to ride and 59% said they would walk more if there were pathways
separated from motor vehicles (The National Bicycling and Walking Study, pp
30.)
Supporting this need for trails are the results of a telephone survey for the City of
Chula Vista conducted in 1995 and 1996 to assess the community's recreation
needs and preferences. The results issued by Research Network, Ltd., indicated
that 7-8% of those who responded wanted more biking and jogging paths,
Users of trails are classified as either recreationists or commuters. Recreationists
are those users who use the trail for exercise, enjoyment, or sport. Commuters
are generally defined as bicyclists or pedestrians who walk or bike to school,
places of employment or services. It is anticipated that both recreationists and
commuters will use the trail system based on the accessibility of trail segments to
residential areas and to destination points, such as employment centers,
services, schools, and recreation areas. Since the trail system will connect
urbanized areas to open space areas, there will be a variety of trail users
depending on the location and trail surface.
Bus and/or rail service are readily available and accessible within most parts of
the City connecting to Tijuana to the south and the Santa Fe Depot in downtown
San Diego. At the Santa Fe Depot, trolley service is available to other points in
San Diego County; the Coaster provides service along the coast from Oceanside
to San Diego, and Amtrak links San Diego to destinations far north. The Coaster
and Amtrak together offer over 98 passenger trains daily with service along the
San Diego coast and beyond. Residents of Chula Vista may elect to use the
Greenbelt trail system from adjacent residential neighborhoods to bike or walk
along the trail to connect to buses or the trolley.
8
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft·April2tJulv 30, 2003 I
Individuals frequently state that they would ride their bikes to commute to work if
there were adequate safe facilities away from roadways with high vehicular traffic
that connect to their home. (San Diego Bicycle Attitude Survey, 1995). Both
pedestrians and bicyclists who walk/bike to the trolley or to bus stops are
expected to increases when there is a trail system that encounters less cross
traffic and connects to employment centers, bus stops, and train service. The
Sweetwater segment of the Greenbelt trail and the Bayshore Bikeway along the
Bayfront are both identified as regional bikeways in SANDAG's Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP) that will provide connections to bus and rail service.
One of the key goals of the RTP is to integrate bicycle and pedestrian facilities
into the existing multi-modal transportation network and a primary objective of the
RTP is to increase, at a minimum of 30 miles each year, the miles of bikeways
and another is to increase walking by 150% as a mode of regional commuting
trips.
Educational benefits of trails include firsthand experiences highlighting the
importance of the natural environment and developing an appreciation of nature,
At staging areas, trail kiosks can enhance the experience of the trail users by
offering educational experiences.
Some of the economic benefits resulting from multi-use trails include trail-related
expenditures for goods and services, trail-related construction and maintenance
jobs, increased tourism, and increased real estate values. A survey on the
relative increase in property values on homes in close proximity of the trail
identified that 23% to 30% of respondents felt that an adjacent trail significantly
increased the value of their homes (Sonoma State University 1992).
Direct economic benefits are derived from users of the trail who also spend
money on food, lodging, fuel and clothing in the region. An indirect economic
benefit involves the increase in the quality of life in the community, improving
property values near the trails, and increasing air quality by reducing the number
of vehicles.
A 1994 survey of house-buying preferences, by American Lives, Inc., found that
74 percent of homebuyers said the presence of walking and biking trails is very
or extremely important in their choice of location. This answer was fourth, behind
quiet, low traffic area at 93 percent, designed with cul-de-sac streets, circles and
cou rts at 77 percent and lots of natural, open space at 77 percent.
In 1995, Parkwood Research Associates conducted a survey for Rodale Press in
which respondents were asked what their current primary means of travel was,
and "all things being equal, and if good facilities for each existed, which of these
means would you prefer the most"? Persons bicycling and walking rose from 5
percent to 13 percent, while the percentage of people driving alone fell from 76
percent to 56 percent. (Source: Pathways for People, Rodale Press)
9
City of Chula Vista
Greenbeit Master Plan
Final Draft-ApI'il-2-1Julv 30, 2003 I
Trails constructed within natural terrain may limit encroachment into the natural
environment. Nature cannot be fully appreciated until one is allowed to interact
with it and understand it. With appropriate signage, these trails offer an
awareness of the environment and protect varied wildlife species, their habitat,
nesting cover, and breeding grounds.
Multi-use trails allow the general public and people with special needs and
abilities to access outdoor environments and participate in outdoor activities. Off-
road trails improve access to and through areas that otherwise would be difficult
or impossible to view and enjoy. A significant portion of the trail will be designed
to accommodate various groups of people, including the very young, elderly, and
disabled.
1.3 Components of the Greenbelt
For planning purposlJs, the Greenbelt is divided into eight segments. Seven of
these segments are consistent with the segments of the Greenbelt described in
the General Plan except that a more descriptive name has been given to each
segment (See Figure 11). An additional corridor, the Otay Ranch Village
Greenway, a component of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, has
been added as a component of the Greenbelt since it provides an opportunity to
develop a trail corridor connecting from Salt Creek, through the heart of the Otay
Ranch and Wolf Canyon, to the Otay Valley Regional Park near Rock Mountain.
A more detailed description of each of the segments is included in Chapter 5,
The Plan. The segments include:
1. Lower Sweetwater (Figure 12)
2. Sweetwater Regional Park (Figure 13)
3. San Miguel (Figure 14)
4. Otay Lakes (Figure 15)
5. Salt Creek Corridor (Figure 15)
6. Otay Ranch Village Greenway (Figure 16)
7. Otay Valley Regional Park, East and West (Figure 16 & 17)
8. The Bayfront (Figure 18)
The Bayfront borders the San Diego Bay
and parallels Interstate 5 from the Otay
River to the Sweetwater River. It is
characterized by its access to the Bay,
marinas, and the regional Bayshore
Bikeway. The Bayfront hosts several small
parks.
Two segments, the Otay Valley Regional
Park, East and West, follow the Otay River
10 Bayfront
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft April-21 Julv 30, 2003 I
from the County Park at the southern edge of Lower Otay Lake and westerly to
Interstate 5. The regional park comprises 8,700 acres of a multi-jurisdictional open
space that is planned for natural preserve areas, active and passive recreation,
and equestrian, hiking, and biking trails. The valley contains a county park
situated at the eastern end, "Knott's Soak City" a water slide park, Coors
Amphitheatre, and the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge (South San Diego Bay
Unit) at the western end.
Otay Lakes (Upper and Lower Otay Lakes)
lie east of Salt Creek and are located at the
far eastern boundary of the City. The
Olympic Training Center overlooks Lower
Otay Lake.
The Salt Creek corridor begins at the Auld
Golf Course, progresses south through the
Rolling Hills Ranch area and follows Salt
Creek, passing by the Olympic Training
Center to the east and ending at the Otay Otay Lakes
River Valley.
San Miguel includes the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge (Otay-Sweetwater
Unit), the newly developing residential development of San Miguel Ranch and the
Auld Golf Course at the base of the San
Miguel and Mother Miguel Mountains,
Sweetwater Regional Park includes the
County's Summit Park on the west edge of
the Sweetwater Reservoir then extends
from Summit Park west through the Bonita
Golf Course and the Chula Vista Golf
Course to Interstate 805. It comprises 570
acres of which 178 acres are located within
the boundaries of the City of Chula Vista. It
featu res existing hiking, biking and Sweetwater Regional Park
equestrian trails, an equestrian staging
area, Rohr Park (currently the City's largest community park), bordering the Chula
Vista Golf Course and Summit Park at the eastern end of the Bonita Golf Course
Lower Sweetwater extends along the Sweetwater River flood channel from
Interstate 805 west to Interstate 5. Along this segment, the flood channel
generally separates National City and Chula Vista.
Otay Ranch Víllage Greenway travels through portions of Villages 7 and 11,
and the Eastern Urban Center connecting Salt Creek, Wolf Canyon and the Otay
Valley, as depicted on the adopted Otay Ranch General Development Plan. This
11
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-April-2-tJulv 30, 2003 I
segment begins within urban areas on the east, and then continues through the
Wolf Canyon natural drainage corridor beginning at planned La Media Road and
continuing west then south to the Otay Valley Regional Park at Rock Mountain.
t2
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft"ApFiI"21Julv 30, 2003 I
Chapter 2
Existing Conditions
2.1 Historical Context
The historical beginnings of Chula Vista are of interest when planning the
Greenbelt System since much of the early development, from prehistoric to the
early development of California, occurred along the water features that surround
the City and which constitute significant portions of the Greenbelt. Over 283
cultural resource sites were located in the Otay River Valley alone which
indicates that the early settlers inhabited the river valleys" One of the early
developments in Chula Vista occurred with the salt production of the Western
Salt Company in early 1871, under the name of La Punta, along the San Diego
Bay"
Recognizing the opportunities of Chula Vista, the Kimball brothers formed the
San Diego Land and Town Company in 1888" Colonel William Dickinson who
managed the SD" Land and Town Company was well known in the early
development of Chula Vista and is considered its earliest town planner. Lower
Otay Dam was completed in 1897 and served the South Bay communities until
1916 when it was destroyed by flood. The City of San Diego rebuilt the dam in
1919 providing water to the newly developing agricultural communities west of
the Otay Lakes and creating the Greenbelt eastern border of Chula Vista,
At the beginning of World War II, due to Chula Vista's location along the San
Diego Bay, Rohr Aircraft Company settled in Chula Vista. With that, industrial
development grew and the City saw an influx of new residents.
2.2 Local and Regional Setting
The City of Chula Vista is located south of downtown San Diego and National
City, north to northeast of Imperial Beach and north of portions of the City of San
Diego and the Baja, Mexico border. Bordering the City to the north is the
unincorporated community of Bonita. Much of the area to the north, east and
south of the Upper and Lower Otay Lakes is located within the unincorporated
County, portions that wRiBh-are designated as open space as part of the Multiple I
Species Conservation Program (see page 13 for a summary of the MSCP
program).
Chula Vista is growing rapidly with a population of approximately 200,000. By
the year 2020, the population is expected to reach 270,739" The community is
diverse both in economy and ethnicity" Supporting a higher than average
13
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft April2lJulv 3D, 2003 I
proportion of population less than 15 years of age, the demand for parks, trails,
and outdoor activities continues to grow.
2.3 Relationship to Other Local and Regional Plans
Citv of Chula Vista - General Plan
The City's General Plan recognizes that there are opportunities to create a
greenbelt system surrounding the City. The Land Use Element of the General
Plan defines the Greenbelt as a circumferential greenbelt utilize(ing) existing
developed and undeveloped open space and potential new open space linkages
to create a continuous 28-mile open space and park system around the city (See
pp 1-42 of GP).
The General Plan identifies the Greenbelt segments as the following (See Figure
2, page 10 of GP):
· Bayfront Park to Otay River
· Otay River Valley to Otay Lake Regional Park
· Otay Lake Regional Park to Mother Miguel Mountain and
Sweetwater Reservoir
· Sweetwater Reservoir to 1-805
· 1-805 to Bayfront Park
Parks and Recreation Master Plan I
The City recently adopted a Parks Master Plan that guides the City's park
planning efforts for the developed area of the City, as well as the newly
developing areas in the eastern portion of the City. The Parks Master Plan
document corresponds to the planning efforts of the Greenbelt Master Plan for
the interconnecting subregional trails within Salt Creek Canyon, Wolf Canyon,
and the Otay River Valley.
Chula Vista Master Planned Communities (GDP)
Trails are part of the newly developing master planned community areas known
as Eastlake, San Miguel Ranch, Otay Ranch, and Rolling Hills Ranch. These
master plans, guided by adopted policies contained within General Development
Plans, have designated areas of preserved open space and trails. Many of the
trail segments have been constructed or will be constructed during the
construction of the communities.
The Eastlake III General Development Plan, containing the Vistas and Woods
planning areas, identifies two major off-street pedestrian trails: the Eastlake
Community Trail and the Chula Vista Greenbelt Trail. The Eastlake Community
Trail (Thematic Corridor) extends from Eastlake Hills through the developed
portion of the Eastlake Planned Community to Eastlake Trails within Salt Creek
and will be continued across Eastlake Vistas to overlook Otay Lakes, A
14
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Ä }r4J-2-lJulv 30, 2003 I
pedestrian trail through Salt Creek Canyon will connect to the Greenbelt Trail
System.
San Miguel Ranch includes 2,065 acres of an open space preserve which is a
key segment of the Greenbelt System. The Greenbelt will be connected by trails
from within San Miguel Ranch. Trails within San Miguel Ranch include
equestrian, walking and biking trails and will provide access to regional trails and
Greenbelt trails.
The Otay Ranch is a master planned community which includes an open space
area comprising of approximately 11,000 acres to be set-aside as mitigation for
impacts to sensitive resources resulting from the Otay Ranch development. The
dominant feature linking the three Otay Ranch parcels is the Otay River system,
including a system of canyons and drainage courses and Otay Lakes.
Countv of San Dieqo
The County of San Diego borders the City of Chula Vista from approximately
Interstate 805 east to the Sweetwater Reservoir, east of the Otay Lake
Reservoir, and along the eastern portions of the Otay River. Therefore, planning
trails along the Greenbelt in these areas must take into consideration trail
connections in the County areas. The County is in the process of developing a
Trails Master Plan that is scheduled for public review and adoption in 2002/2003.
Additionally, the County completed a study of bicycle trail alignments along the
eastern side of the Sweetwater River. Utilizing grant funds, they completed a
preliminary design study for the portion of Sweetwater River from Plaza Bonita, in
the unincorporated community of Bonita, to the Chula Vista Golf Course. The
County is continuing to pursue other grants for trail improvements along the
Sweetwater River along the Bonita Golf Course to Summit Park.
Other Local and Reqional Planninq Efforts
A number of planning efforts have been underway for each of the segments at
some level. In order to understand those efforts and the opportunities or
constraints that these documents may pose, a short summary of each is
presented below.
Sweetwater Bike Path
An Environmental Opportunities and Constraints Analysis for the Sweetwater
Bike Path, prepared by Recon (February 14, 2001) analyzes alignment
alternatives for a bike path within the Sweetwater Regional Park (identified in the
report as Areas 13 and 17).
15
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApri~21Julv 30, 2003 I
Dtay Valley Regional Park Concept Plan
The key goal of the Otay Valley Regional Park Concept Plan is to link major open
space areas within the southern area of San Diego County and South San Diego
Bay with lower Otay Lake. The concept plan provides policy direction for the
jurisdictions for coordinated land acquisition and development for the Regional
Park.
The Regional Park extends from the southeastern edge of the salt ponds at the
mouth of the river, through the Otay River Valley, to the land surrounding both
Lower and Upper Otay Lakes. Trails should be located on both sides of the river
wherever possible, with crossings where appropriate. Trail corridors should
provide connections to other regional trails, including the Bayshore Bikeway to
the west, the City of Chula Vista Greenbelt trails which will provide a connection
to Sweetwater Regional Park, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
holdings to the east.
Draft Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan
The Draft Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan for the
City of Chula Vista was conditionally approved by the City Council in October
2000. Since then, the City has been in the process of further revising the draft
Plan to provide additional conservation programs and add another species, the
Quino checkerspot butterfly, to the list of covered species. This comprehensive
document is a long-term habitat conservation plan which implements a
Subregional Plan for the South San Diego County, from Del Mar to the Mexico
border. The MSCP addresses the potential impacts of urban growth, natural
habitat loss and species endangerment, and creates a plan to conserve habitat
that supports a variety of endangered and threatened species, as well as other
sensitive species, while providing for future development of both public and
private lands within the South County.
Port District/Chula Vista Bavfront Master Plan
Both the San DieQo Port District and the Citv of Chula Vista have beQun the
preparation of the Bavfront Master Plan that will address the arranQement of land
uses on approximatelv 300-acres west of Interstate 5 freewav and rouahlv
between G Street and Palomar Street. Included in this plan will be where future
open space, parks and trails will be located to implement the Greenbelt concept.
As the Bavfront Master Plan is not expected to be completed for about two years,
anv parks. trails or other facilities identified in this Greenbelt Master Plan are
considered conceptual at this time,
16
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApril21Julv 3D, 2003 I
Chapter 3
Goals and Policies
Goals and policies provide direction for the overall program of the Greenbelt
Master Plan. The following goals and policies respond to the intent of the Master
Plan as defined in the General Plan and specific issues for implementation.
Goals are very broad statements of purpose. These are identified below in
bold type.
Policies are specific statements guiding action and implying clear
commitment. These are identified below in normal type.
Goal 1.0: To establish a comprehensive and coordinated Qreenbelt I
system trail notwork that visually reinforces the natural
character of the community and integrates unique historic and
cultural resources, open space areas, creeks, and trails.
Policy 1.1: The City will coordinate and cooperate with the San Diego
Port District, City of San Diego, County of San Diego,
Resource Agencies, Wildlife Refuge, and other public
agencies, as well as private interests, to provide open space I
easements and connecting trail easements tRat-linklng Chula
Vista's Greenbelt.
Goal 2.0: To provide-a connected open space areas within and I
surrounding Chula Vista to enhance the natural beauty and to
preserve native biological and cultural resources.
Policy 2.1: The City will strive to ensure the protection of the natural
habitat from encroachment of trail users through education,
fencing, signing and design.
Policy 2.2: The City will coordinate implementation of the Greenbelt trail
with the Preserve Owner Manager (POM) of the Otay Ranch
Preserve.
Policy 2.3: The City will coordinate the implementation of the Greenbelt
Master Plan with management plans for the Otay River
Valley.
Policy 2.4 The City recognizes the natural value of the open space
through the MSCP preserves and will plan for trails that do
not diminish the value of the pristine environment.
17
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Apri~21July 30, 2003 I
Policy 2.5 The City will locate trails in areas that avoid or minimize
conflicts with natural resources.
Goal 3.0: To establish a greenbelt that ensures public access within the
greenbelt through an active and passive recreation park
svstem with trails connecting each seqment. itself to other
trails, parks and opon space areas to expand opportunities for
passive"fecreatien.
Policy 3" 1 The City will actively pursue open space proqrams and f)Iar¡ I
fBf-and develop trail links connectinq to parks and te-regional
trails.
Policy 32 The City will design trails that will accommodate a wide
range and number of users anticipated"
Policy 3.3 The City will develop a qreenbelt tFaiI system that offers a
variety of active and passive recreation experiences. tfaiIs
for different trail experiences.
Policy 3A The City will develop trails, wherever possible, which provide
for accessibility for all, including those with disabilities.
Policy 3.5 The City will locate staging areas, parking areas, and other
amenities in areas that enhance the use of the trail system.
Policy 3,6 The City will utilize existing fire roads, access roads and/or
utility easements for the trail system when possible.
Policy 3"7 The City will limit the use of multi-use trails to non-motorized
uses except for motorized wheelchairs, and utility,
maintenance, and emergency vehicles.
Goal 4,0: To provide a trail Greenbelt system that receives the
necessary resources for open space acquisition, park and
trailtFail _development, maintenance, and to establish
volunteer programs.
Policy 4.1 The City will identify and pursue potential grant programs for
trail improvements.
Policy 4.2 The City will pursue grant programs and opportunities with
inter-agency cooperation for park and trail development and I
implementation.
18
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Apr-iJ-étJulv 30,2003 I
Policy 4.3 The City will encourage volunteer/community service
organizations to assist in the construction and maintenance
of PDrks and trails. I
Policy 4.4 The City will collaborate with private organizations for
constructing, maintaining, and monitoring trails.
I
19
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draftġ}ri~~1Julv 3D, 2003 I
Goal 5,0: To establish a framework for the City to identify a designateG-ª
staff person or department who will serves as the Greenbelt
trail Mmanager responsible for open space and park
acquisition, obtaining funds, coordination, implementation,
and ongoing maintenance of the Ggreenbelt. I
Policy 5.1 The City will facilitate the design of parks and trails in accordance I
with applicable State and Federal regulations and with best
practices available.
Policy 5.2 The City will coordinate develop maintenance and monitoring I
program2 for the tfaH-Greenbelt system.
Policy 5.3 The City will facilitate the installation of informational signs and
maps within each Greenbelt seqment and along the trail system to
guide trail users.
Policv 5A The Citv will prepare an implementation plan that establishes
department and staff responsibilities for manaqinq open space
property acquisition and inter-aqency coordination. as well as
addresses fundinq for Greenbelt manaqement and maintenance.
20
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApri\-2~July 30, 2003 I
Chapter 4
Greenbelt Design Criteria and Standards
The Greenbelt currently boasts a number of active and passive recreation
bcilities facilities stemminq from:
· Reqional Parks,
· Communitv Parks,
· Neiqhborhood Parks,
· Special Purpose Parks,
· Commercial Parks and Recreation.
· and Multi-use Trails,
These facilitiesWfks currentlv exist and as the Otav River Vallev Reqional Park
is implementedcomeG to realiz;:¡tion. more active and passive recreation parks
will be developed, The Citv's Parks and Recreation Master Plan defines each
park type as follows:
Reqional Parks - larqe open space and recreational facilities provided, wheither
partiallv or whollv, bv the Countv of San Dieqo, Included within the Greenbelt are
reqional parkcthe Sweetwater and Otav Vallev Reqional ParksReqional Park,
Otav Lake County Park, and San Dieqo National Wildlife REfuqe. Activities and
pProqrams include sports fields, picnickinq, campinq, hikinq. and wildlife refuqes.
ffiBluElÍfl§ ct;:¡ging ;:¡rc;:¡c f0f€€ UBstFianc, p;:¡rkc, n;:¡tur;:¡1 epen cp;:¡co, and trailc.
Community Parks - comprisinq 15 or more acres. community parks serve more
than one neiqhborhood offerinq sport fields. recreation centers, picnickinq, and
plavqrounds. Rohr Park, located within the Sweetwater Seqment, is a
communitv park and two communitv parks are beinq developed within the San
Miquel, Seqment and tho Otav Lakes. andl Salt Creek Seqments,
Neiqhborhood Parks - intended to serve local residents and are within walkinq
distance of Y. - % mile, Neiqhborhood parks ranqe in size from 5 to 15 acres,
frequentlv adiacent to schools. and picnickinq. plavinq fields. and plavqrounds,
Neiqhborhood parks are principallv located within each communitv and are not
tvpicallY planned for within the Greenbelt system.
Special PUffJose Parks - are parks that offer specialized facilities or themes.
Located within the Greenbelt are the followinq: Chula Vista Nature Center within
the Bavfront Ssegment, Summit Park, an equestrian park within Sweetwater
Reqional Park (Countv). and the Olvmpic Traininq Center within the Otav Lakes
SseqmenL
21
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApril:?tJuiv 30, 2003 I
Commercial Parks and Recreation - consists ofeffe¡: a variety of active recreation
focusinq on special activities or events. Within the Gqreenbelt there are several
qolf courses, the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course and the Bonita Golf Course
both within the Sweetwater seqment, the Auld Golf Course within the San Miquel
Seqment, the Coors Amphitheater and Knotts Soak City Water Park. both within
the Otay River Vallev Reqional Park seqment, and the Marina View Park with the
Bavfront seqment
Multi-use Trails - provide for a varietv of uses from equestrians to bikinq and
hikinq, Trails have been and are currently being constructed by several
developers of residential communities including Rolling Hills Ranch, San Miguel
Ranch, Otay Ranch, and Eastlake Trails.
Active and passive parks as described above already define the Greenbelt and it
is because of these parks that the maioritv of the Greenbelt exists. Expandinq on
the existinq parks and creatinq additional parks, primarilv within the Otay Valley
Reqional Park where there are opportunities for expansion, will further enhance
the qreenbelt
Multi-use trails have been randomly developed. both formally and informally, It is
the intent of this Master Plan to recoqnize where trails currently exist and to
identifv where the trail svstem may be expanded to enhance the trail svstem and
connect the Greenbelt seqments,
This :¡::he purpoce of this chapter i&-to define the typec of proposed trails and
describes identification of the design of _the Greenbelt amenities, trail design,
sign standards and provide~ guidance for managimLement of the Greenbelt.
The reader should refer to the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan for
further discussion on park proqrams and park desiqn within the City,
4.1 Trail Types
The City's Landscape Manual, dated November 1994, sets specific standards for
trail construction within the City. The intent of the following trail standards is to
augment the standards in the Landscape Manual.
The design guidelines identified in this chapter set forth minimum standards for
the two general types of trails specified below. Variation to the minimum
standards will be based on consideration of the number and types of trail users
and environmental constraints. These factors should guide the width of the trail
and the location of the trail to reduce impacts on resources and topography.
For the purposes of the Greenbelt, there are two general types of trails defined:
Multi-use Trail and the Rural Trail. The Multi-use Trail is a trail for bicyclists,
equestrians (where identified), pedestrians, joggers, and other non-motorized
22
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApr{j¿-lJulv 30, 2003 I
activities. The Rural Trail provides access to natural open space areas that may
be off limits to vehicles. These trails may serve pedestrians, bicyclists and
equestrians depending on permitted uses in the resource areas.
4.1.1 General Standards
By design, the City's trail system encourages use by a variety of different types of
users. In cases where the trail is adjacent to, or located along an existing or
proposed park, the park design should consider the trail access, trail parking, and
trail signage during the park design. Active recreation is recommended to be
located at a minimum of twenty feet away from the trail.
Continuity and consistency in trail design is necessary to ensure that the user's
expectations are satisfied and will result in the trail being used frequently, A
discontinuous trail or one that changes in trail width or trail composition results in
complaints by users.
Trails should intersect all crossings at 90° angles, if possible. Motorcycle or
vehicular access shall be restricted with signage or additional design or detailing.
No curbs or vertical features within five feet of the edge of the trail should be
constructed along trails that provide for equestrian use, except where a fence is
required for a downhill slope. A minimum of 14'0" overhead clearance shall be
provided and maintained for both built and natural features adjacent to the traiL
Trail design or construction techniques may vary in order to respond to specific
site constraints as determined appropriate by City staff.
4.1.2 Trail Surface
The trail surface may be asphalt, concrete, decomposed granite, a soil-stabilized
surface, or native soil. The advantages of an asphalt or concrete surface are that
the trail can accommodate the widest range of users and is frequently used in a
more urbanized setting. The surface choice will be dependent on the trail
connection and the anticipated trail usage. In more rural areas or where the trail
connects to a decomposed granite trail, the trail should offer a continuous
surface treatment.
A soil-stabilized trail is one constructed of a non-petroleum binder combined with
aggregate to produce a compacted pavement surface that retains the
characteristics of aggregate but is noted for its comparatively cool summer
surface temperature and natural appearance. The soil-stabilized product is
applied as a cold treatment and may be constructed at remote locations. This
product also avoids the air quality concerns of the construction of hot mix asphalt
product. Users of trails constructed of this type of surface may include joggers,
bikers, equestrians, wheelchair users, and strollers. The surface is not
compatible for roller bladders or skaters.
23
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draftġ}ril2tJulv 30, 2003 I
4.2.1 Multi-Use Trail
A multi-use trail is simply defined as any trail that is used by more than one user
group or for more than one trail activity. Multi-use trails are often called "shared
use" or "mutual use" or "diversified use" trails. Multi-use trails accommodate the
largest number of user types on a limited land base and development of multi-
use trails should be given preference over trails with specific users restricted.
Multi-use trails are an efficient, economical, and increasingly common way to
provide broad trail opportunities.
Equestrians, mountain cyclists, and hikers typically share unpaved multi-use
pathways and bicyclists, walkers, joggers, persons with disabilities, rollerblades,
strollers, and other non-motorized activities share paved multi-use pathways.
Even a single-track pedestrian-only trail will be used by hikers, backpackers, trail-
runners, bird watchers, etc., so that in the broadest sense all trails are multi-use
trails.
A multi-use trail constructed of concrete or asphalt would extend a minimum
width of 10'0" with two feet natural shoulders, This hard surfaced pathway
consists of 4" of concretelasphalt over 2" of base and would be ADA accessible.
In some instances, there may be opportunities to provide a hard surface trail with
a reduced width of five to eight feet with a parallel four to five foot natural trail for
equestrians, When the multi-use trail is split, a post and rail fence would
separate the paved pathway from the natural path. A post and rail fence along
side of the trail would be installed where a downslope condition exists greater
than 5' bordering the traiL
A multi-use trail of decomposed granite (DG) or native soil shall have a minimum
width of 10'0" and a depth of 6" of compacted decomposed granite or compacted
native soil contained within 6" wide concrete mow curbs along both sides of the
trail. 4" plastic recycled headers may be used to contain the trail as determined
by the City of Chula Vista. A Concrete Treated Base (CTB) or a similar liquid soil
solidifier may be used to solidify the native base. These types of trails utilize the
existing decomposed granite and do not change the color of the soil. It has been
used for parking lots and service roads to provide stability with the existing soil.
These trails are cheaper to construct but require more frequent maintenance.
Users may include equestrians, mountain bicyclists, joggers and walkers. Due to
the difficulty of rolling on decomposed granite or natural dirt trails, both persons
with disabilities or with strollers avoid these trails.
A 5' separation shall be required when a multi-use trail parallels or borders a
roadway. It is anticipated that pedestrians, joggers, people in wheelchairs, and
bicyclists would use this trail. A multi-use trail along a roadway does not replace
a bicycle lane installed or proposed or required to be installed within the
roadway.
24
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-A¡Mil-é1Julv 3D, 2003 I
Fbst & RaJI Fencit'1g
on Down Slope Side
6' Decomposed Granite, c
2'Concrete Asphan or ConCfete as a
¡¡¡
on 4' Base Specified NatiVØSoj "
Native Soil - E
2'CorICrete ~g
004' Base 0
,,/¡\irOW/)IMi!) m
"-
, ,'...n_ .. .-,:.~. .;<1
1'6' 6 10
Z Z
Adjacent to Slope
Multi-Use Trail
Not to Scale
Pos1& RaitFencing TrailSîgn
on Down Slope Side 2'x2'Max.
Redwood c
orPIastie a
Wood Sign ¡¡¡
Headers Native SoU NaliveSoil 'õ
" Post With ~ §
Native Soil R"'wood 2'Footing
OJP\u.tlc ,- =
0
\!1)\i,O\" Ii\ I III i!) Headers il m
"-
....... , '-.. ".'~"'~,': . ' "", , " . .., ...._.~.. .... --..,,·r " ,., ..., ,,".""~.""'
. , .. ,~_.. .. ,. ,.. .---..
2'CLR ,. 2'CLR
Adjacent 10 Slope
Rural Trail
Not to Scale
Figure 4~ I
25
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-April 21Juiv 30, 2003 I
4.1.4 Rural Trail
A Rural Trail would be constructed at width of 1 O~ Ji compacted native soil and I
contained within redwood header strips or some similar material. The rural trail
would be also designed for a variety of users, such as pedestrians, bicyclists,
and equestrians. However, since it would be constructed in rural areas and may
be subject to steeper slopes, it may not accommodate all types of user abilities or
type of users. In such areas it may also be designed to a reduced width due to
environmental concerns (see Section 4.1.5, Special Trail Design Criteria).
A post and rail fence alongside of the trail shall be installed when a slope
condition higher than 5Ji! exists within 5Ji! to either side of the trail. These trails I
would be located in natural resource areas and where available would utilize
existing maintenance or fire access roads. Rural trails may be located above a
creek bed, on a steep slope or along a dirt utility access road.
26
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft"Aprii2-1Juiv 30, 2003 I
Table 1
Trail Standards
Design Component Multi-use Trail Rural Trail
Standard Width' 10' 10'
Varying width of 4'-5' in Core
Preserve areas or habitat areas
Horizontal Clearance 14' 14'
Vertical Clearance 10' (14' where trail use permits 10' (14' where trail use permits
eauestrian) eauestrian)
Cross Slope 1 - 4% optimum Depends on terrain and
6% maximum in approved environmental constraints
locations****
Vertical Grades*** 0-5% ***** 5-20% maximum distance over
500 feet
10-15% maximum for distance
limited to 250 feet
15-20% maximum for short
distances less than 100 feet
Standard Shoulder Width 2' of native or decomposed No shoulder required
granite adjacent to concrete or
asphalt path
or
6" wide concrete strip ar 4" plastic
recycled headers adjacent to
decomoosed oranite oath
Headers 6" concrete headers Redwood headers
Surface Treatment Decomposed Granite Native Soil
Concrete (Decomposed Granite or Soil-
Asphalt stabilized treatment in areas
Soil-stabilized treatment subject to soil erosion)
(As specified for each trail Trail tread to be cleared of rocks
segment) over 1" in diameter, debris, and
roots.
Post and Rail Fence
Fencing** Post and Rail (wire fence, as appropriate, may
(Fencing to be located outside of (See Fence Exhibit Xl 0) be used in areas of native habitat) I
shoulder) *Width may be reduced for short sections where available width is constrained due to environmental or other
constraints upon approval of the Director of Planning and Building Director.
.. Fencing to be installed on down slope side or separating a paved trail from a natural trail or when a multi-
use trail with equestrian use permitted borders a roadway.
*** Switchbacks may be considered in steep slopes
.... Designated wheel chair access routes shall not exceed 2%,
..... Wheel chair routes will have landings every 30 inches of vertical rise"
27
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft Aprfl-2-1Julv 30, 2003 I
4.1.5 Special Trail Design Criteria
Depending on where trails are located and the expected type of users, there may
be special design criteria required. Short segments of the Greenbelt trail system
may traverse exceptionally steep terrain, be located within sensitive habitat areas
or co-locate on utility maintenance roads. In these special situations, typical
standards for trail construction may not apply. Criteria for trails to minimize the
effect of erosion, reduce the impacts of human or equestrian impacts to sensitive
animals, or provide adequate stability to allow for the use of maintenance
vehicles are addressed below.
Trail Tread Desiqn
The trail will consider the type of use and the unique circumstance where the trail
is proposed to be located. Trail design shall consider erosion and diversionary
devices to reduce erosion through the use if water bars and berms. Slopes shall
be compacted to prevent erosion.
Natural Resource Areas
The Greenbelt travels through urbanized settings to natural, undisturbed
resource areas. The hillsides are covered with native upland habitat, coastal
sage scrub and the valleys boast oak woodland and riparian vegetation.
Together these natural communities provide important and diverse wildlife
habitat. The MSCP Preserve lands, as described in Chapter 2, are dedicated
conservation lands that will also serve to connect large areas of open space
through a series of wildlife corridors. Trails through these areas will be designed
carefully to avoid adverse environmental impacts and will be subject to
environmental review pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act.
Construction of trails mandates that the natural environment be preserved to the
greatest extent possible and that a minimal amount of grading occurs. Clearing
of vegetation for trails should be minimized and trails should be located where
impacts to these natural communities are limited. All disturbed terrain should be
replanted with native vegetation.
Minimizing environmental impacts is a high priority for resource and recreation
managers. Natural resources such as wildlife, vegetation, water, and air quality
and historic and cultural resources are vulnerable to impacts caused by
inappropriate trail usage or overuse of a trail. Resource impacts such as soil
erosion, damaged vegetation, polluted water supplies, litter, and vandalism can
result in dissatisfaction with trail usage and possible closure of trails to various
types of user groups. There have been a number of studies conducted to
determine which user groups or the numbers of users that causes the most
impact to natural resources. Impacts are generally activity specific. Some
activities create impacts more quickly or to a greater degree than others.
28
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApÁ~2-tJuiy 30, 2003 I
Impacts even from the same activity can vary according to such factors as mode
of transportation, characteristics of users, size of group, and behavior.
Along a creek, the top of the bank is the preferred location for the trail in order to
minimize erosion and bank stabilization problems. Although trails along steep
slopes should be avoided, when a trail connection is needed or to optimize the
trail network, a trail may be located along a slope using a bench cut to minimize
erosion. Cut slopes above the trail should be limited to a 2:1 slope and all
disturbed slopes would be replanted with native vegetation.
The following trail design guidelines shall apply within sensitive habitat areas and
are consistent with the City's draft Multiple Species Conservation Program
(MSCP) Subarea Plan (Section 7.5,3 Public Access, Trails and Recreation):
1) Locate public access, trails, view overlooks, and staging areas in the least
sensitive areas of the Preserve, Locate trails along the edges of urban
land uses adjacent to the Preserve, or the seam between land uses (e,g.,
agriculture/habitat), and follow existing dirt roads as much as possible
(except where occupied by Quino checkerspot butterflies) rather than
entering habitat or wildlife movement areas. Avoid locating trails between
two different habitat types (ecotones) due to the typically heightened
resource sensitivity in those locations.
2) In general, avoid paving trails in wildlife areas unless management and
monitoring evidence shows otherwise. Clearly demarcate and monitor
trails for degradation and off-trail access and use. Provide trail
repair/maintenance as needed. Undertake measures to counter the effects
of trail erosion including the use of stone or wood cross-joints, edge
plantings of native grasses, and mulching of the trail.
3) Minimize trail widths to reduce impacts to critical resources. To the
maximum extent practicable, do not locate new trails wider than four feet
in core Preserve areas or wildlife corridors. Core areas and wildlife
corridors, where new trails may be limited to four feet, will be defined in
area-specific management directives (plans). Where trails are planned in
concert with sewer or water utility easements, the trail width should
consider the easement requirements for the utility. Trails should not be
encouraged within SDG&E easements. Provide trail fences or other
barriers at strategic locations when protection of sensitive resources is
required.
4) Limit the extent and location of equestrian trails to the less sensitive areas
of the Preserve. Locate staging areas for equestrian uses at a sufficient
distance (e.g., 300-500 feet) from areas within riparian and coastal sage
scrub habitats to ensure that the biological values of the Preserve are not
impaired.
29
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft Apr-il 21Julv 30,2003 I
5) Limit the access to finger canyons through subdivision design, fencing or
other appropriate barriers, and sign age.
6) Provide sufficient signage to clearly identify public access to the Preserve.
Barriers such as vegetation, rocks/boulders or fencing may be necessary
to protect highly sensitive areas. Use appropriate type of barrier based on
location, setting and use, For example, use chain link or cattle wire to
direct wildlife movement, and natural rocks/boulders or post and rail fence
to direct public access away from sensitive areas. Lands acquired through
mitigation may preclude public access in order to satisfy mitigation
requirements,
4.2 Greenbelt Design
Within the Greenbelt, the residents enjoy golfing, playing fields and playgrounds,
a water park, trails, equestrian staging areas, natural open space, and trails.
Other parks and trails have been and are currently being constructed by several
residential developments including Rolling Hills Ranch, San Miguel Ranch, Otay
Ranch, and Eastlake Trails, The purpose of the Greenbelt Design section of this
chapter is to provide design criteria for proposed Greenbelt amenities.
4.2.1 Greenbelt Signs
Visitors to the Greenbelt will be greeted by a consistent, unique logo that
identifies the Greenbelt and will guide users along the Greenbelt. The logo
should be located at each trailhead or entrance, staging area and along the trail.
Signs for entranceways, staging areas, directional signs, regulatory signs and
trail markers are important to project safety and inform users on the rules of the
road. Trail signs will inform visitors of the location of the trail, where it goes, the
type of activity permitted, and enforcement standards. Trail signs are divided into
the following: Greenbelt Trail Signs, Trail Kiosk Signs, Trail Sign Posts, and
Staging Area signs. All signs shall be painted with graffiti resistant paint.
Information about trail usage displayed on the Trail Kiosk signs shall be in both
English and Spanish. Greenbelt siqn construction and installation responsibilities
will be addressed in the implementation plan. to be prepared subsequent to this
master plan.
30
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Finai Draft-A :}fil-21-Julv 30, 2003 I
Greenbelt Trail Siqns
Trail signs will be located at trail access points such as at street crossings and at
staging areas. The 4' x 4' x 2" wood trail signs consist of the Greenbelt logo and
City logo constructed on an attached to a 6" x 6" post, 6,0' high.
Figure 5
Greenbelt Trail Sign
31
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Ä¡}FiI21Julv 30, 2003 I
Greenbelt Kiosks
A kiosk is a large sign panel that informs the user about the trail. A kiosk is
located at active trail heads and staging areas. Each kiosk includes the Greenbelt
logo, a trail map, regulation for use of the trails and Greenbelt, community
events, and other information. All kiosks will be designed to meet visual and
physical ADA access requirements. Kiosks may be designed to include the
acknowledgement of sponsorships by local agencies, organizations and/or
corporations.
ProtectiVe Wood Cap +,
Greenbelt Logo with
Inset of Appropriate
Jurisdiction logo.
Display Case or 4"x4" Wood
Bulliten Board Support Posts 00
+,
Space Reserved for '"
Trail Maps and
Public Information, '"
+,
Pedeslal with Relief
Image. Actual Materials Ñ
to be Determined,
+.
1 -:4' i.- -~--~
Trail Head Kiosk Concept
Not to Scale
Figure 6
32
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Apr-¡~;1-1Julv 30, 2003 I
Trail Siqn Post
Trail sign posts shall be located along the trail and installed at every half mile,
identifying the trail distance. Affixed on each signpost are permitted and
prohibited uses, distance, and the identifiable Greenbelt logo. The posts will be
constructed of 6" x 6" treated wood posts set in concrete 42" above grade.
Reduced Greenbelt
Logo with 1 nset of
Appropriate
Jurisdiction Logo.
2' Wide Color Band
tor Trail Identification.
<0
Permitted Uses and ¡.,
Trail Information as .'
Applied Buttons.
6'xS" Treated Wood
Post Set Height 3' 6'
Above Ground.
\\1111\11" Vllhl,lll
""."..t-'
'"
.'
Trail Sign Post Concept
Not to Scale
Figure 7
33
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftAw"" 21Julv 30, 2003 I
4.2.2 Staging Areas
Staging areas offer a convenience to the trail
user by providing parking for vehicles,
bicycles and, where noted, tie-ups for horses
and other facilities. Facilities for equestrians,
such as parking for horse trailers, should be
provided where the trail links to trails
designated for equestrian use. Other
amenities may include restrooms, a drinking.
fountain, a public telephone, picnic tables and
benches, trash containers, water trough and
hitching post for horses, mounting stand for Equestrian Staging Area at Bonita Road
equestrians, and a self-latching gated
paddock.
Staging areas should be located at all major
entrances to trails and at key connection
points to other regional rural trails. The
number of parking spaces should be
determined by the projected demand. The
precise number and location of future staqinq
areas will be determined as opportunities and
fundinq becomes available. There are three
types of staging areas discussed in this plan:
staging areas using existing parking lots for Paddocks at Summit Park
parks, libraries and schools or other public
parking lots (Staging Area Type I), standard
staging areas (Staging Area Type II), and
staging areas with equestrian facilities
(Staging Area Type III) as described and
illustrated below:
Staqinq Area Tvpe 1- Public Parkinq
A public parking staging area includes public
parking lots for local parks, schools or other
public parking. A trailhead sign connecting to
a public parking area will identify the
entrance to the traiL Staging Area at Sweetwater Regional
Park
Staqinq Area Tvpe 11- General Staqinq Area
A General Staging Area will be constructed for trail access where appropriate.
Additional amenities may be available such as bicycle parking, trash containers,
picnic tables, drinking fountains, restrooms with pit toilets or flush toilets, or
portable self-contained toilets"benches, air units for pumping bicycle tires, and a
34
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApr#2-iJulv 30. 2003 I
Greenbelt Kiosk with a trail map. A trailhead sign will be erected at the entrance
of the trail and the entrance to the staging area,
Staqinq Area Type 111- An Equestrian Staqinq Area
Staging Area Type III provides equestrian parking for horse trailers, vehicle
parking, and bicycle parking and trash containers. Additional amenities for
equestrians should include a horse corral with a self-closing gate, hitching posts,
mounting benches and water. Greenbelt kiosk signs may include trail map and
notices of upcoming events. Additional amenities may be provided such as a
drinking fountain, restrooms with either pit toilets or flush toilets, or portable self-
contained toilets, and picnic tables. The Greenbelt currently contains three
equestrian staging areas located along Sweetwater River: at Plaza Bonita, at
Sweetwater Park, and at Summit Park. A trailhead sign will be erected at the
entrance to the trail and at the entrance to the staging area.
Restrooms with Trail Head Kiosk
drinking fOuntain
and telephone
Shade Trees and
Accent Landscaping
Typical Staging Area Concept
Without Equestrian Facilities
Not to Scale
Figure 8
35
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-April 21Julv 30, 2003 I
RestrootrlS'With traì1ÏiðadK\()sk
Ddhking'Founfa:in
and Tetèþh6ni!.
Bicycle Pðrklng
Shade Trees and
Accent Landscaping
Typical Staging Area Concept
With Equestrian Facilities
Not to Scale
Figure 9
4.2.3 Site Furnishings
In addition to the trail, other
amenities add to the experience of
the trail user. At trail entrances, a
wider area should be set aside to
provide a park-like setting at the
entrance, which would add to the
enjoyment of the Greenbelt. Site
furnishings may include benches,
picnic tables, trash containers,
drinking fountain, bicycle racks, a
shade structure, lighting and/or
landscaping. Site furnishings will Bench and Kiosk at Sweetwater Regional Park
be made of durable material and
be vandal resistant.
36
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftAprilélJulv 30, 2003 I
4.2,4 Accessibility Guidelines
The Greenbelt facilities will be developed for many types of users and trails will
be designed across various types of terrain and sensitive to the environment.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act presents opportunities to
balance accessibility with sensitivity to the environment.
Federal guidelines prepared to assist in the design of recreation facilities for
accessibility were completed in 1999 with the release of the "Regulatory
Negotiation Committee on Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas,
Final Report" (Accessibility Guidelines), Factors that influence the ability to
provide fully accessible facilities such as soil, surrounding vegetation, hydrology,
terrain, and surface characteristics, are fundamental to designing for accessibility
for the outdoor area.
A continuous path of travel is the single most important tfa#-Qill:Lfeature to a I
person with a physical disability. Additionally, four other design components are
essential to being a fully accessible park or trail. These design components I
include:
1) Access to the park or trail,site, including parking areas and the path of
arrival used to get from parking areas" to the tr;:¡il,
2) Access and egress points points to the Dark and loc;:¡ted along the trail,
3) Support facilities and desirable amenities, including the placement of
restrooms, drinking fountains, telephones, etc., with respect to the park I
proqrams and trail and any access paths leading to these support
elements;
4) Access to accurate information regarding the Greenbelt, project I
loc;:¡tion, how to get to the park or trail site-and potential hazards of a
project, plus location and height of on-site interpretive signage
programs (Federal Highway Administration, National Bicycle and
Walking Study).
4.2.5 Fencing
Post and rail fencing will be used where a fence is
required, unless approved by the Director of Planning
and Building. Fencing is recommended along the
Greenbelt trails to separate the trail from a road
and/or development, to guide the trail along steep
slopes and canyons, and to restrict access into core
Preserve areas or native habitat. The use of post
and rail fencing in natural resource areas allows the
movement of wildlife through the fence. Other types
of fencing may be used when determined by the
Director of Planning and Building.
37 Rural trail along
Sweetwater Road
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-April-21 Julv 30,2003 I
Fencing should be installed along trails in the following conditions:
· When the trail accommodates equestrians and is adjacent to a
roadway,
· When there is a need to separate user groups in areas where high
usage is anticipated or planned for, or
· When it is necessary to prevent trespassing on resource lands, private
property, or agricultural areas. City I
· When there is a down slope condition (per Citv Chock
specifications ).
· To separate a multi-use trail from a paved pedestrian sidewalk.
· To provide an equestrian paddock at Staging Areas.
Fencing should follow the natural grades along the trail. The City's standard for
post and rail fencing include the following and is reflected in the graphic below:
Fence sections are 8'0" on center and 4'0" in height with a 2'0" subgrade footing.
The posts shall be a minimum of 6" diameter and the rails shall be a minimum of
3". All lumber is to be CCA Pressure treated. The subgrade at footings is to be
at 90% compaction. Footings shall be concrete, each with at least 80 pounds of
dry Portland cement. Footings will not be visible upon completion of trail
construction. Concrete footings shall be 470-C-2000 Class B concrete. In all
instances, there will be an 18" clear space at the bottom of the fencing to allow
for movement of wildlife, The lodgepole pine fencing will be treated with wood
preservative.
38
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftAj}rH21Julv 30, 2003 I
1 '!:8'0<; ------ t
,
;,
.
,.
.
"
.
"
}WJ¡\JrAf! \W~~!IMIIW}¡h;~I} rNiAllßf! lìI/¡},¡IA(/ lIiMMliwm)IA{jj \wLihl~f
~ .-.-
..
,.
Post and Rail Fence
Not to Scale
Figure 10
Off-road Vehicle Barriers
Off-road Vehicle Barriers shall be constructed where breaks in fences occur that
would allow vehicle access onto trails. ORV barriers shall be at least eight feet
and eight inches in width and attached to ends of fence posts near to roads.
4.2.6 Arterial Crossings
Where the trail will cross a major roadway carrying traffic volumes in excess
25,000 ADTs (average daily trips) a grade-separated overcrossing may be
considered. Overcrossings are typically less expensive than tunneling under a
roadway, but require as much as 400 to 500 feet of approach structure on each
end due to the maximum 5% gradient as specified by ADA. The following table
identifies key criteria for overcrossings:
Table 2
Grade Se arated Roadwa Crossin s
Traffic volume thresholds: 25,000 ADT or reater
Recommended minimum trail width 8 feet (undercrossings should provide
ta ered sides with wider clearances at to
minimum overhead 10 feet (14 feet for equestrian use)
hones, benches
39
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftAprilé1Julv 30, 2003 I
This master plan identifies overcrossings of EastLake Parkway at Hunte Parkway
and of Hunte Parkway east of EastLake Parkway. Undercrossings of the trail
system are identified through Wolf Canyon at Main Street, La Media Road and at
SR125. Other undercrossings are proposed at Otay Lakes Road near the Otay
Reservoirs and at several roadway crossings through the Otay Valley and the
Sweetwater Valley.
4.2.7 Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan Requirements
As an implementation measure of the State of California's Clean Water Act, the
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board on February 21, 2001 adopted
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System standards (Order No. 2001-01,
NPDES No. CAS0108758) referred to as "Municipal Permit". The Municipal
Permit requires the implementation of a Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management
Program (URMP). The objectives of the Jurisdictional URMP that are to
effectively prohibit non-storm water runoff into storm drain systems. The Model
Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) was developed to
address post construction urban runoff pollution from development projects.
These requirements are important to the development of the staging areas when
there results in the creation of 5,000 square feet of impervious soil or with greater
than 15 parking spaces and potential exposed to urban runoff. Design of staging
areas, which are subject to SUSMP, will need to provide Best Management
Practices (BMP) that may include such measures to reduce imperviousness such
as providing runoff storage measures throughout the site landscape with the use
of detention, retention and runoff practices. These measures of may include
onsite retention or pavement techniques that allow runoff to remain on-site.
BMPs may also include construction of trails with permeable surfaces such as
decomposed granite surface or pervious concrete as recommended in this
document.
Additionally, the NPDES standards identify pollutants of concern that potentially
affect storm water runoff and the quality of groundwater that include animal
waste. Within the Greenbelt where equestrians are permitted, signs may be
posted that require waste pickup and proper disposal along with the availability of
free bags at staging areas and trash receptacles at suitable intervals along the
trails.
4.3 Greenbelt Management and Maintenance
The entire Greenbelt falls within five jurisdictions, the Cities of Chula Vista,
National City, and San Diego, and the County of San Diego and Port District I
(FiQure 10). Management and maintenance responsibility generally lies with the
property owner, which may be one of the jurisdictions, a resource agency, a
40
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-A¡;r-ii21Julv 30, 2003 I
utility company or a homeowners association. In areas where a segment(s) is
within more than one jurisdiction, the greenbelt may be managed by several
agencies or the agencies may agree to jointly manage the open space.
Management and maintenance within the Greenbelt includes open space,
passive and active recreation facilities, and/or trails. Each requires a different
level of management and maintenance; however, there are some typical
ingredients to consider for anyone or all of these components, as discussed in
this section,
4.3.1 Greenbelt Management
A good management program is essential to ensure long-term success. After
planning and implementation, the success of any Greenbelt system is
determined by how well the Greenbelt is managed. This document however does
not identifv the Greenbelt Manaqer but recoqnizes that a Greenbelt Manaqer will
be essential to the overall success of the proqram. Further discussion with the
affected jurisdictions is necessary to determine the appropriate manaqement
aqenCV and fundinq mechanisms for a lonq-term maintenance proqram,
The key tasks of Greenbelt managers are to:
· Maintain safety,
· Protect natural resources, and
· Provide high-quality user experiences.
As the Greenbelt system becomes more refined with a comprehensive trail
system and other active recreation facilities, the number of users and their
diversity increases, management and maintenance will become increasingly
important.
An effective management program may employ a variety of tools and may utilize
various tools at different times. For example, education and appropriate signage
advising users on how to use the Greenbelt have been successful in reducing
encroachments into sensitive areas and reducing user conflicts. Depending on
the location, purpose of the trail, and level of trail use, hours of operation and trail
use restrictions will be important to define.
Hours of operation
The Greenbelt system is primarily intended for use during the day. Tr;:¡iI £Signage I
notinq hours of operation wool€l-restrictª nighttime activity. Limiting the use
during nighttime hours reduces the impact on adjacent properties. Depending on
the segment, and use level, specific hours of operation should be established
and posted.
Trail Use Restriction
Although the majority of the trails within the Greenbelt system are designed for
4t
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft Ä¡}ri124 Julv 30, 2003 I
and intended to be used by a variety of trails users (e.g. pedestrians, bicyclists,
and equestrians) there may be instances within where certain types of users
might be restricted, either permanently or temporarily. It is anticipated that this
would occur when there are specific concerns related to protection of biological
resources; when the trail is undergoing maintenance or construction; when use of
the trail would be detrimental to the trail maintenance such as after a rain storm;
when there is a potential hazard such as crop spraying or harvesting; or during a
emergency situation. Trail signage that identifies the permitted use will be
installed at the beginning of each trail segment. A temporary trail closure sign
would be posted at each trail segment with an anticipated date for trail reopening.
The trails are designed to allow access through open space areas and for the
enjoyment of the public. Trail use will be limited to the designated trail by fencing
and/or signage.
Open Space Manaqement
In addition to passive and active recreation and trails :Jnd :Jctivo rocro:Jtion, the I
Greenbelt includes large areas of natural resource lands. Much of this land will
be protected through the City's Multiple Species Conservation Plan, the Otay
Ranch Resource Management Plan, the Sweetwater Marsh and San Diego
National Wildlife Refuges, and the Otay Valley and Sweetwater Regional Parks,
Because of the scope and size of the Greenbelt, specific implementation,
management, and ownership of these resource lands will vary. Within the
Greenbelt, management is currently implemented by the public agencies
mentioned above and the federal resource agencies (U,S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and California Division of Fish and Game) in the case of the Wildlife
Refuges. Fiqure 10 depicts iurisdictional and aqencv areas of influence. I
As mentioned in the MSCP, management will include a program for short-term
management of resources, primarily prior to dedication to the public. Long-term
management would include:
· Preserve Maintenance
0 Removal of trash, trimmings, debris and other solid waste
0 Maintenance of trails and fences
0 Implementation of security programs to enforce security programs
and curtail activities that may degrade resources
· Preserve Management
0 Implementation of programs to maintain and/or improve, operate
and manage Preserve habitat values through removal and control
of exotic plant species, treatment of disease or injury, and/or habitat
restoration.
0 Remediation necessary due to changed circumstances.
· Long-term Biological Monitoring
I
When considering the implementation of the Greenbelt Plan, the precise
management program that is used should be defined in the planning process and I
42
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft April2,+Julv 30, 2003 I
focused on the three key goals mentioned above: maintaining safety, protecting
natural resources, and providing high quality user experiences. I
43
0
0
0
';>
]
z+~ .
î
~
~
0
-
"
0
..-
w
0:::
:J
C)
-
LL
w In
~ ~ " ~ f-
II: w ü
« ¡¡o
CI > Zw
D.. '" 0>- f-
(J)(J) 0 W '" º<O '" !!1 õ
II: <n « f-::> ",,,, 0 <
ZZ w «~ >
a. 0 Zw w« '"
"'f- Z U
wO "-~ 0'" f-"- W
W ::> <{-I ¡-ill 0
0 a.w 0 <Ow ;:« «> .
a.~ ü'" '" wu. t-z ~o:: ~
<I: ",Z õ::J "
00 ::;:tJ a. wQ >-~ 5,
a. '" ~9 WC) «w ~~
1-0 In >'" 6 $:W t-a::
ü<O "';: ."
z u.¡!r Qa. .0
...J(J) " .
W .'Õ
w- IJ] BËI rn []] ..
aJD: a. >:c
0 .-
z::J ., ~~
"-~
w" lL~
w- ~~
a:::(J) 0 ,,~
~~ « <0 W
f- 0 W
en 0 t-
'> <0 0
w z
I-C) « 0 « ~ f- Z
In ~ en ü
~O Z ::> z u. U ¡¡o
I «
> a::: 0 ü <n 0 ~ f-
<n
¡:: u. u. ~ « 0 .
<CD.. 0 0 Z .0
0 Z 0 f- ~H
...J õ ~ ~ ::> ¡:: '"
::J U U 0 « 0 ~.
In ü z "- ~I e> Ii
X i2
0 => ID~II ~ 6~.~
-. u §~
8~
".
--
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft April-2·1Julv 30, 2003 I
I
Trail Costs
The following table may serve as a guide for approximate costs for trail
construction.
Table 3
Estimate of Probable Costs
Trail Approximate Cost Per Mile
Path
· Rehabilitate or upgrade existing path $50,000
· Construct Soil Stabilized Path on base. $52,000
Includes signing,
· Construct Soil Stabilized Path on base. $96,000
Includes signing with removal of existing
railroad tracks,
· Construct asphalVconcrete path on $150,000
existing level embankment, or right of
way, includes signing, striping
· Construct asphalVconcrete path on $194,000
existing level embankment, or right of
way, includes signing, striping with
removal of existino railroad tracks.
Support Facilities:
· Signal Loop Detectors $2,500/intersection
· Undercrossing $150,000 - 350,000
· Signing, striping $5,000
· Signing, striping, signals $65,000
· Irrigated Landscaping $350,000 - 600,000 mile
· Non-irrigated Landscaping $150,000 - 300,000 mile
· Bridge (8' wide) $60 - 100 square foot
· Fencing $20 linear foot
· Railroad Crossing $125,000
· Emergency Cellular Phone (installed) $3,500
Cost estimates were based on 2002 dollars and actual cost experience in various California communities.
These costs are estimates only; based on specific conditions costs will vary and more detailed estimates
should be developed after preliminary engineering.
4.3.2 Greenbelt Maintenance
Preventive maintenance reduces hazards and future repair costs. Annual trail
maintenance costs are generally estimated at 5% of infrastructure replacement
costs. For example, if a bridge costs $100,000 to construct, $5,000 should be
budgeted for its maintenance each year. (Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning, a
Guide to Best Practices, January 31,2001).
Whoro pr;:¡ctic;:¡blo ;:¡nd fo;:¡Giblo, tr;:¡il m;:¡n;:¡gors ;:¡ro oncoumgod- to m;:¡ximizo tho
opportunity to improvo ;:¡cceGsibility on tr;:¡ils through tr;:¡il maintonance ;:¡nd rop;:¡ir
aGtivitios. Evory time ;:¡ trail is maintained, tho opportunity to improve 3CCOSS is
prosent.
45
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft Apri1-2tJulv 30, 2003 I
Routine maintenance will include provisions for:
· Removal of debris, dead or decaying vegetation, broken branches in the
trail, clearing trail of encroaching brush or grasses, removing rock slides,
etc. Collecting and removing trash and litter. Routinely checking and
repairing vandalism and/or graffiti,
· Maintenance of trail tread such as filling of ruts and entrenchments;
reshaping trail bed; repairing trail surface and washouts; installing rip rap
(rock placed to retain cut and fill slopes); dragging and rolling trails
constructed of native dirt monthly constructing retaining walls or cribbing
to support trail tread, repairing damaged redwood headers, etc.
· Replacing decomposed granite on DG trails where it has eroded or
deteriorated. Erosion control and drainage, replacing or installing
necessary drainage structures such as drainage dips, water bars, or
culverts; realigning sections of trail to deter erosion or avoid boggy/marshy
areas, etc.
· Repairing Greenbelt signs and furniture. Repair of trail and/or trailhead
structures. This includes replacing deteriorated, damaged, or vandalized
parts of structures such as sections of bridges, boardwalks, information
kiosks, fencing, and railings; painting; removing graffiti, etc
Maintenance logs are essential to ensuring that the trail remains an asset to the
community and does not become a hazard or a liability. A consistent
maintenance program should include a mechanism to identify, record, and
respond to maintenance programs and to keep written records of remediation
efforts. The following table provides a general schedule for routine maintenance.
Table 4
Recommended Maintenance Schedule
Item Freauencv
Sign replacement and repair 1-3 years
Pavement marking replacement 1-3 years
Tree, shrub, trimming/fertilization 5 months - 1 year
Pavement sealing 5 -15 years
Clean drainage system 1 year
Pavement sweeping Monthly - annually as needed
Shoulder and grass mowing As needed
Trash disposal As needed along trail, several times
weekly at staging areas,
Lighting replacement/repair 1 year
Graffiti removal Weekly - monthly as needed
Maintain furniture (bike racks, tables) 1 year
Fountain/restroom cleaning/repair Weekly - monthly as needed
Pruning 1 -4 years
Bridqe/tunnel inspection 1 vear
46
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft April-2:tJuly 30, 2003 I
Remove fallen trees As needed
Week control Monthly - as needed
Maintain emergency phones, CCTV 1 year
Maintain irrigation lineslreplace sprinklers 1 year
Irricate! water Dlants Weekly - monthly as needed
*These are general timeframes. Actual frequency will vary depending on weather, usage. and site
conditions,
4.3.3 User Conflicts
The vast majority of users of public open space are satisfied with their
experience and few have complaints. However, conflicts among users do occur
and if not addressed, may have serious consequences. As the number of users
grow at a particular facility and the diversity of the activities expand, the potential
for conflict grows.
For instance, with the advent of mountain bicycling, the use of unpaved multi-use
pathways has sometimes resulted in conflicts with equestrians and hikers.
Rollerblading and skateboarding activities have resulted in user conflicts on
paved pathways with pedestrians, persons with strollers, and cyclists when there
is a high demand for the trail.
User conflict is defined as "goal interference attributed to another's behavior."
This is based on an individual's interpretation or perception of appropriate
behavior that may be contrary to their individual trail objectives. Design in
accordance with "Best Practices" and on-going maintenance can reduce user
conflicts. Although there may be many factors that contribute to user conflict, the
manager of the Greenbelt is responsible to resolve conflicts that hinder the
success of the Greenbelt system and may decrease safety.
Trail User Conflict
The potential number of incidents of user conflicts may be reduced by monitoring
or limiting bicycle speeds, conducting routine surveys, and educating users on
safety and courtesy. User conflicts that threaten user safety may include:
· Collision and near misses of users and/or their bicycles or horses.
· Reckless and irresponsible behavior.
· Poor user preparation or judgment
User conflict is frequently witnessed in areas where there are a high number of
users. Generally in areas more remote or when there is predominantly one type
of user, there are fewer reported conflicts. However, designing a trail that can
accommodate a broad range of users in areas where a large number of users
are expected can alleviate or reduce concerns. While research of 37 trails
throughout the nation (Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, 1998) revealed that while the
47
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Apri~2-iJuly 30, 2003 I
estimated usage of the 37 rail trails was approximately 9.2 million users annually,
there was only one major accident. Ongoing trail monitoring allows a watchful
eye on possible conflicts and continuous trail maintenance will also reduce user
dissatisfaction or potential accidents.
In response to a survey conducted by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, trail
managers identified the following techniques utilized to resolve user conflicts:
· Signage
· Education
· Meeting with user groups
· Expanding facilities
· Police or ranger patrols
· Enforcement of regulations
· Brochures and articles in local newspapers
· Imposing speed limits
· Volunteer patrols
· Partial closing
· Bicycle bell give-aways.
Establishing a uniform and acceptable "passing alert" phrase such as "passing
on the left" reduces numerous potential safety conflicts. In areas where trail use
is the heaviest such as near trailheads, it is advisable to provide separate paths
for different types of users or to provide a wider pathway, For instances, where
trail usage is very heavy around Rohr Park, bicyclists are cautioned to notify trail
users before they pass.
Good tFail--management may employ any or all of the above mechanisms, or I
others that will be applicable to the particular situation. The right choice depends
on local factors and the individual situation as well as recognition of the conflict
before it degenerates beyond reasonably simple solutions. An integrated
program of design, marketing, education, regulation, enforcement and
maintenance are all needed to ensure a successful, long-term tfaiI-- Greenbelt I
system. Developing partnerships with trail groups that conduct trail maintenance
and provide a "watchful eye" while participating in trail activities can assist a trail
manager with limited staff.
48
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-ApriI2-tJulv 30, 2003 I
Chapter 5
The Plan
5.1 Planning Approach and Methodology
The Greenbelt is characterized by its diversity. Each segment varies with
regards to the open space and park tvpe, user tvpe, trail type, variety of UÐers, I
and ty¡:;es-of environment environment, from an urbanized to a natural, rural
setting. The intent of the Greenbelt is to offer a variety of experiences for its
visitors u&efS within a relatively short distance from the surrounding community. I
This chapter is divided into a narrative describing each segment, followed by
Table 5 summarizing the segments and approximate costs of construction for the I
multi-use trail within that seqment, and by a map of the entire Greenbelt system
(Figure 11). At the end of this document are maps delineating each segment of
the Greenbelt (Figures 12 through 18).
The descriptions include the nature of the Greenbelt open space, existing trails,
proposed trails (trails that are planned as part of this document or as part of an
adopted Specific Plan), future trails and the issues that remain for completing trail
gaps within the Greenbelt.
5.2 Greenbelt Segment and Trail Descriptions I
5.2.1 Lower Sweetwater Segment
Lower Sweetwater Sogment-Seqment consists of the channelized portion of the
Sweetwater River with an improved pathwav on the north side and an
unimproved path on the southside. BeeginolD9-S at Interstate 5~ and the
channelized portion of the Sweetwater River borders at the northern edqe portion
of the City, and then continues from 1-5 east along the channelized river to Plaza
Bonita Mall, then south to the equestrian staging area at Plaza Bonita Road and
Bonita Road (Figure 12). The Sweetwater River channel traverses through the
Cities of National City and Chula Vista, the County of San Diego, and is bordered
by the City of San Diego.
Greenbelt Issues:
Althouqh desirable, restorinq the river to its natural state would require extensive
coordination with both state and federal aqencies and qreat expense, #ail
ilmprovements to the trail alonq the souths ide of the river would need to be
coordinated with the appropriate juriÐdictionaqencv. as would ~joint grant
applications for trail development would be decir;:¡ble.
There is no direct connection from the south/west side of the river to the
north/east side near Plaza Bonita MaiL A trail. now overqrown, near Bonita Road
49
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApI'il":?1-Julv 30, 2003 I
would provide a connection to the trails and the staqinq area at Bonita Road and I
Plaza Bonita Road,
Existinq and Future Trail
Within the Lower Sweetwater Segment, two existing trails extend from Interstate
5 to Interstate 805, one on the north and one on the south bank of the
Sweetwater Flood Control Channel. Both trails traverse the Cities of National
City and Chula Vista boundaries and also serve as maintenance roads for the
channel.
The north side trail is twelve feet wide and paved, and extends from the
Bayshore Bikeway, west of Interstate 5, to a concrete walk at the Plaza Bonita
Mall east of Interstate 805. Cyclists, walkers and joggers actively use this multi-
use trail. Users park at the Plaza Bonita Mall or along Plaza Bonita Road near
the eastern entrance to the trail to access the trail and unload/load bicycles for
trail riding.
The south side trail is twelve feet wide and unimproved. This trail extends from
the San Diego Trolley tracks, just east of Interstate 5, to and under Interstate
805, The trail ends at this point One connection between the north side and
south side trails and to Plaza Bonita Road occurs across the flood channel, over
the riprap. The other connection occurs across Sweetwater River at Edgemere
Avenue (extension of N. Second Avenue in Chula Vista),
From the Plaza Bonita Road staging area on the north side of the river the only
access would be along Plaza Bonita Road; however, this roadway is not striped
or posted for bicycle access,
Trail Issues
· The path along the north side of the river offers a paved multi-use pathway to
the staging area at Plaza Bonita Road and Bonita Road. Although desired,
construction of a multi-use paved pathway connecting the trail from Plaza
Bonita Mall to the intersection of Plaza Bonita Road and Bonita Road would
impact riparian habitat by widening the trail along Plaza Bonita Road.
· The unimproved trail along the south side of the river is overgrown from the 1-
805 overcrossing to just north of Plaza Bonita Road, The southside trail is
primarily an equestrian trail and use of that trail and the equestrian staging
area would be increased if the connection to the trail was improved and
maintained.
+rail Greenbelt Recommendations
· Coordinate with the City of National City to provide bicycle lane improvements
along Plaza Bonita Road from the north side of Sweetwater River at Plaza
Bonita to Bonita Road.
50
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft April-2+Julv 30, 2003 I
· Coordinate with the City of National City to encourage development of a park- I
like staging area at the proposed retail center at 1-805 and Plaza Bonita.
· Investigate improvements along the east and west sides of Sweetwater River
from 1-805 to the under-crossing at the equestrian staging area at Plaza
Bonita Road and Bonita Road.
· If fundinQ priorities permit. consider the potential of restorinQ the Sweetwater
Flood Control Channel to a natural condition and closelv coordinate with
affected aQencies and iurisdictions as appropriate on the matteL
5.2.2 Sweetwater Regional Park Segment
Sweetwater Regional Park Segment begins at the equestrian staging area at
Plaza Bonita Road and Bonita Road and proceeds east along Bonita Road past
the private equestrian facilities. Bonita DrivinQ RanQe. Rohr Park. Chula Vista
Golf Course" and the Bonita Golf Course ending at Summit Park (Figure 13).
Rohr Park is a Citv Communitv Park providinq active plavinq fields. plavground,
picnickinq, and a multi-use pathway alonq the perimeteL Summit Park~-ffi-a
County park~ -#!at offers an equestrian staging area, rest rooms, picnicking and
natural dirt trails for equestrian§-tf5e, mountain bicvlists~ and hikersiR§.
Greenbelt Issueso
ExpandinQ the facilities at the staqinq area at Plaza Bonita Road to include
restrooms and a plaVQround would increase it's usaQe. Connections to each of
the park facilities alonQ the Greenbelt would Qreatlv enhance the Greenbelt. An
informal trail, primarily used by equestrians, traverses from the StaQìnQ Area at
Plaza Bonita Road, The Countv has plans to develop a multi-use trail from the
Staqinq Area to Rohr Park and from Rohr Park to Summit Park.
Existinq and Future Trail
From the existing equestrian staging area at the
northeast corner of Plaza Bonita Road and
Bonita Road, the existing unimproved
equestrian trail leads to the bridge under-
crossing at Willow Street. From here, a multi-
use trail, including equestrian use, follows along
the north and south side of the Chula Vista
Municipal Golf Course. On the south side, the
multi-use trail proceeds through the golf course
parking lot continuing to Central Avenue. On
the north side, the multi-use trail extends along
the edge of the Municipal Golf Course at Willow
Street and Sweetwater Road then along
51
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftA¡><il-é+Julv 30, 2003 I
Sweetwater Road and crosses several driveways along Rohr Park. A portion of
the north trail west of Rohr Park extends through the jurisdiction of the County of
San Diego. Rohr Park serves as a staging area for cyclists and pedestrians, and
provides restrooms, picnicking, playgrounds, parking and open fields for play.
I
The multi-use trail with equestrian path continues to Central Avenue and along
Central Avenue with a chainlink fence separating the trail and the road while a
four-foot paved path extends closer towards the edge of the golf course. The
paved pedestrian path ends at Bonita Road. The equestrian trails continue from
Central Avenue along both Bonita Road and Sweetwater Road to the Bonita
Road bridge. The trails continue along the Bonita Golf Course on both north and
south sides of the golf course connecting to Summit Park with an under-crossing
at the Bonita Road crossing. There is a small staging area with no parking on
the north side at Sweetwater Road.
Trail Issues
· The multi-use trail must cross at Central Avenue and users may interact with
vehicles, An under-crossing at Central Avenue does not appear feasible due
to the elevation of the road above the river; however, an equestrian light at
the intersection would improve the trail crossing.
· The trail past the Bonita Golf Course would be reconstructed during the
construction of State Route 125, a proposed freeway that would be aligned
around Summit Park and the north to connect to State Route 54.
· The City of Chula Vista currently maintains the north side trail along
Sweetwater Road, within the jurisdiction of the County of San Diego;
however, no formal maintenance agreement is currently in place between the
two jurisdictions. Adequate budgeted improvements to this segment may be
constrained without a formal agreement.
+raiJ-Greenbelt Recommendations I
· Explore funding opportunities to improve the multi-use path along Rohr Park,
both north and south sides,
· Coordinate with the County to review design plans for trail improvements
between Plaza Bonita Road and Willow Street, and between Central Avenue
and Summit Park along the Sweetwater River.
· Coordinate and review design plans with Caltrans for the realignment and
reconstruction of the trail under SR 125.
· Improve the trail around Rohr Park to a multi-use trail with 10-lL'paved trail I
and a 5J:t' native dirt to enhance the use for pedestrians, wheelchairs, and
strollers while maintaining equestrian use.
52
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Apr¡j·21 Julv 30, 2003 I
. Coordinate with the County to establish formal agreements for future
maintenance and improvements of the multi-purpose trail along Sweetwater
Road, within the County's jurisdiction.
5.2.3 San Miguel Segment
The San Miguel Segment connects Summit
Park, Sweetwater Reservoir, portions of the
San Diego National Wildlife Refuge, and San
Miguel Ranch, a planned residential
community, to the developing planned
communities of Rolling Hills Ranch and
Eastlake along the eastern portion of Chula
Vista (Figure 14k_Portions of this segment
are located in the County of San Diego,
Trails have been designed in San Miguel
Ranch to connect through Rolling Hills Ranch East of Summit Park
to trails east along the Upper Otay Reservoir
and south through the Salt Creek open space corridor.
Greenbelt Issues~
Without a doubt, the views from Summit Park eastward are awesome, Informal
trails in this area are used by equestrians and mountain bicyclists for rides alonq
pristine natural terrain, connectinq to Sweetwater Reservoir. San Miquel
Mountains. and Summit Park. Defininq these trails for future public access will
required coordination with the Countv of San Dieqo.
Existinq and Future Trail
Just before Summit Park, the equestrian trail separates into two trails. A native
trail continues in a northeastern direction to Sweetwater Reservoir. The other trail
continues to Summit Park. The trail wraps around the northside of Summit Park
and then splits with one trail progressing south to San Miguel Road and the other
trail progressing southeast. The trail that continues to San Miguel Road would
cross the road and connect to the east side of Proctor Valley Road. Proctor
Valley Road may be widened in the future and the trail should be accommodated
during the road design.
A multi-use trail for cyclists and pedestrians is proposed along the east side of
Proctor Valley Road. The trail would consist of a stabilized decomposed granite
surface for mountain cyclists, and hikers. The trail would connect from San
Miguel Road and extend along Proctor Valley Road until it reaches Mt. Miguel
Road, After crossing to the east side of Mt. Miguel Road, the trail becomes
concrete south to east/west Proctor Valley Road, then turns east on the north
side of Proctor Valley Road and travels east on a ten-foot wide concrete
meandering trail to Hunte Parkway, The Greenbelt trail then crosses to the east
53
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-April":1-tJulv 30, 2003 I
side of Hunte Parkway to connect with the north/south trail that crosses Proctor
Valley Road.
Where the Greenbelt trail intersects at Mt. Miguel Road, however, a spur of the
trail also extends northerly, along the east side of Mt. Miguel Road, until it
connects with the Community Park in San Miguel Ranch, where from here the
trail extends through the community park running east behind single family
homes to a hilltop in the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge. Opportunities for
other trail connections from this point may present themselves but would require
cooperation among several agencies for this to occur. Additionally, a 10 ft. wide
decomposed granite trail will be constructed along the north side of Mt. Miguel
Road connecting Proctor Valley Road through the San Miguel Ranch community,
crossing the SR125 toll way by bridge, to where Proctor Valley Road intersects
with Mt. Miguel Road to the south. This segment of trail will not accommodate
equestrians due to the SR125 crossing.
Trail Issues
· Currently, there are no known trail easements south of San Miguel Road
along Proctor Valley Road to the San Miguel Ranch master planned
community across existing single-family residential properties.
· The trail along San Miguel Road (in front of Summit Park) may be jeopardized
by future road improvements.
· Construction of the trail along the east side of Proctor Valley Road may be
difficult as a result of available roadway right-of-way constrained by adjacent
open space recently acquired by the State of California for conservation
purposes,
· Connecting a trail from the San Miguel Ranch trail spur to the San Diego
National Wildlife Refuge and the Sweetwater Reservoir may be desirable but
would require cooperation of several agencies.
+míI-Greenbelt Recommendations I
· Coordinate with the property owners south of San Miguel Road to secure trail
easements to connect to the trail along the east side of Proctor Valley Road.
· Coordinate and review trail design plans along Proctor Valley Road to ensure
connectivity of trail and consistency with trail guidelines.
· I ncorporate a 10ft. wide decomposed granite trail along the eastside of
Proctor Valley Road as part of future improvements of Proctor Valley Road,
· Coordinate with the County of San Diego and promote the inclusion of the
trail along San Miguel Road in future improvement plans.
54
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApri!-2otJulv 30, 2003 I
. Coordinate with the County of San Diego on efforts to connect the trail from
Summit Park to Proctor Valley Road.
5.2.4 Salt Creek Segment
The Salt Creek Segment includes the Salt Creek open space corridor from
Rolling Hills Ranch south along the Eastlake and Otay Ranch communities to the
Otay Valley and the Otay Valley Regional Park East (Figure 15). Three
Communitv Parks are beinQ developed as part of the planned communities of
San MiQuel Ranch, RollinQ Hills Ranch and Eastlake Communitv. The Greenbelt
trail will be located within the Salt Creek open space corridor through Rolling Hills
Ranch and Eastlake along the easterly edge of Salt Creek. South of Olympic
Parkway, where highly sensitive natural habitat in Salt Creek will be protected,
the trail will be located along the westerly edge of Salt Creek.
Greenbelt Issuesò
Urbanization of this area has allowed the development of much of the trail
svstem alonQ Salt Creek for bicvclists, walkers and JOQQers. However. in order to
accommodate this future population. roadwavs constructed have reduced trail
opportunities for equestrians and possible connections to open space areas
without roadwav interface. To enhance the experience of the visitor alonq the
trail system and to provide for disabled access, construction of overcrossinQs or
undercrossinqs of maior roadwavs are desirable,
ExistinQ and Future Trail
A multi-use decomposed granite trail would be constructed from Proctor Valley
Road at the Community Park in Rolling Hills Ranch, along the east side of Salt
Creek. At Proctor Valley Road, the Greenbelt trail would cross and proceed
easterly along the edge of Eastlake Woods development and then south along
the edge of the Upper Otay Reservoir.
Currently, there are existing separate paved and dirt trails on the east side of
Hunte Parkway south of Proctor Valley Road. Both trails end prior to Otay Lakes
Road. An extension of the trail is planned as a multi-use trail constructed of a
stabilized decomposed granite surface along the Eastlake Woods and Eastlake
Vistas communities from Proctor Valley Road with an at-grade crossing at the
Community Park, south of Otay Lakes Road. At the southern edge of Eastlake
Vistas and Eastlake Trails, the trail would travel west to the intersection at Hunte
Parkway, then cross Olympic Parkway and continue south along the east side of
Hunte Parkway where the Otay Ranch Village Greenway will connect south of
Village 11. The trail would then continue along the west side of Salt Creek on the
university site and connect to the Otay Valley Regional Park East trails. The
multi-use trail along Salt Creek would accommodate bicyclists, walkers, joggers
and wheelchairs.
55
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-April-L+Julv 30, 2003 I
From the northeast corner of Proctor Valley Road and Hunte Parkway a trail spur
will extend northward through the Salt Creek open space corridor. This
decomposed granite trail will end near the Otay Water District property and Auld
Goff (golf) Course to the north.
HaiJ-Greenbelt Recommendations I
· A signal at Proctor Valley Road and Hunte Parkway is planned to
accommodate pedestrians and cyclists. It is recommended that the signal be
installed when the trail is completed.
· A signal at Otay Lakes Road and Woods Drive is planned to accommodate
pedestrians and cyclists, It is recommended that the signal be installed when
the trail is completed.
· Future consideration of trail overcrossinqs should occur if fundinq becomes
available.
5.2.5 Otay Lakes Segment
The Otay Lakes Segment includes both the Upper and Lower Otay Reservoirs,
bordering the eastern reaches of Chula Vista (Figure 15). This segment offers
views of the reservoirs and the natural mountain terrain. The Olympic Training
Center and a County of San Diego roqiona park are located at the southern end
of Lower Otay Lakes. Fishinq and boatinq are permitted on the lake, Many
cvclists bike alonq Wueste Road, bordinq the Otay Lakes,
Greenbelt Issueso
Lake access for the public is currentlv limited due to the sensitivitv of existinq
bioloqical habitat around the lake and the lack of access paths. Access to the
lake could be further enhanced by developinq controlled hikinq and equestrian
trails alonq the lake, addinqadditional picnic areas. and providinq parkinq. It
would be desirable to limit vehicular access to Wueste Road to maintenance and
emorqenov vehicles ao bicvclinq alonq this two lane roadv/ay is ieopardized by
soenio roadway drivers.
Existinq and Future Trail
Bicyclists currently travel along Wueste Road overlooking the Otay Lakes. A
planned multi-use trail elevated as a graded bench between Eastlake Vistas
development and Wueste Road is to be constructed of a stabilized decomposed
granite pathway and will connect with a planned neighborhood park in the Vistas
development overlooking the Lower Otay Reservoir. A paved trail currently
exists along the portion adjacent to the Olympic Training Center from the
southern portion of the lower Otay Reservoir to the County Park. Part of the
planned trail system for Eastlake Woods includes trails that will follow the west
side of the Upper Otay Reservoir, passing around the Otay Ranch House and
continuing to Otay Lakes Road,
56
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft,Apri~2tJulv 30, 2003 I
The draft County Trail System Assessment, May 3, 2001, identifies an equestrian
trail along the edge of the Otay Reservoirs connecting to the County Park. The
County Otay Lake Park offers picnicking and restrooms. An equestrian staging
area at the park would be ideal to provide additional access to the Otay Valley
Regional Park.
I
Trail Issues
· Bicyclists will continue to travel along Wueste Road despite the lack of bicycle I
laf¡esprovision of other Greenbelt trails and the narrow width of the road.
· Developing the proposed equestrian trail along the Otay Lakes will require
coordination and approval by the City of San Diego Water Department
· There is currentlv no qrade separated trail connection between Upper and
Lower Otav Lakes.
+mil - Greenbelt Recommendations I
· Install a signalized crossing at Otay Lakes Road.
· Encourage the County to construct an equestrian staging area at the County
Park at the southern end of Lower Otay Lakes.
· Coordinate with the County of San Diego and the City of San Diego to permit
equestrian trails along the Otay Lakes,
· If an equestrian trail is successfully established around the Otay Lakes design
and construct a trail connection under Otay Lakes Road when this segment of
roadway is reconstructed and widened in the future.
· If Wueste Road is closed in the future to vehicle traffic between Otay Lakes
Road and Olympic Parkway (except for maintenance and emergencies),
consider the potential for converting this segment as an additional multi-use
trail link for use by bicyclists, rollerblades, and other non-motorists.
5.2.6 Otay Valley Regional Park, East and West Segments
Otay Valley Regional Park is a planning effort by the Cities of Chula Vista and
San Diego and the County of San Diego (Figure 16 and 17). The key goal of the
adopted Otay Valley Regional Park (OVRP) Concept Plan is to link major open
space areas within the southern area of San Diego County and South San Diego
Bay with lower Otay Lake. This component currently supports two commercial
recreational facilities: Coors Amphitheater and Knotts Soak Citv Water Park.
Additional park facilities and proqrams are currentlv beinq planned.
57
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft~pril21Julv 30, 2003 I
Greenbelt Issues~ I
A Tr3i1s Master Plan is currently being prepared for the east and west segments
of the Otay Valley Regional Park, separate from the Greenbelt Master Plan. This
Plan upon adoption will provide implementation policies and standards for these
segments of the Greenbelt. Other future plans include developing active parks
and continuing strategies for acquisition of parkland, Located along the Otay
River Valley are the Coors Amphitheater and the Knott's Soak City water park.
Much of the land within this area is privately owned. The OVRP Concept Plan
provides policy direction for the jurisdictions for coordinated land acquisition and
development for the Regional Park. There is a Policy Committee (PC) consisting
of one elected councilor board member from each participating jurisdiction who
provide direction to the 30-member Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), make
decisions about planning and acquisition for the park, and provide
recommendations relating to OVRP to their respective jurisdictions.
Existinq and Future Trail
Planned multi-use trails, including equestrian trails, would extend south from Salt
Creek, on the east side of Village 11, connecting with the Otay Lakes Trail just
south of Village 11. The trail will follow south to Heritage Road. At least one trail
will extend westerly, on a maintenance road for the Salt Creek Sewer, through
the Otay Valley on the north side of the river. A trail will extend along the south
edge of the existing Auto Park and the proposed Auto Park Expansion. The trail
will then cross under 1-805.
Trail Issues
· Potential trails along SDG&E easements will need to be coordinated with the
utility company,
· Identify location of trail crossings at three major roads between 1-805 and 1-5.
· The connection to the Bayfront through the commercial area and the wildlife
preserve will need to be resolved.
+faiI-Greenbelt Recommendations I
· Support adoption of the Trails Master Plan for the east and west segments of
the Otay Valley Regional Park.
· Assist in the coordination efforts to develop the trail along the river
considering undercrossings at 1-805 freeway, Beyer Road, Beyer Boulevard,
the trolley line, and 1-5 freeway.
· Assist in the coordination efforts to locate a trail along the National Wildlife
Refuge to connect to the Bayshore Bikeway.
58
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftA :}"il-21 Julv 30, 2003 I
5.2.7 Otay Ranch Village Greenway Segment
Although not a part of the original Greenbelt as identified in the General Plan, the
Otay Ranch Village Greenway segment has been added to the Greenbelt Master
Plan as it is a major trail linkage identified within the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan. This segment will connect from the Salt Creek trail through
urban villages and the Eastern Urban Center to the Wolf Canyon natural terrain
area (Figure 17). The greenway presents opportunities for a multi use tr3il th3t
will provide mobility for residents between sever31 --viUagec 3nd provide
connectivity between recreation areas in the Em;tern Urban Center and future
park(c) 310ng the Greenway.
Greenbelt Issues:
-The Villaqe G€lreenwav presents opportunities for a multi-use trail that will
provide mobilitv for residents between several villaqes and provide connectivitv
between recreation areas in the Eastern Urban Center and future -park(s) alonq
the Greenwav_ Developinq a trail link alonq Wolf Canvon tow#! link the Gtav
L:1lwsSalt Creek Seqment to the Otav River Valley will need to be sensitively
planned to avoid adverse environmental impacts while providinq opportunities
foras well ac provide opportunities for a nature trail public access.
Existinq and Future Trail
An existing dirt utility access road for a variety of ranch operations is located
along Wolf Canyon connecting future La Media Road southwest to the Otay
River Valley, on the north and west side of Rock Mountain, offering an ideal
setting for a multi-use trail. With improvements consisting of decomposed
granite or other special material (concrete treated base), depending on
maintenance road minimum requirements, this existing access road would serve
as a multi-use pathway within the Wolf Canyon open space.
The access road/pathway will extend under or over Main Street/Rock Mountain
Road and La Media Road. and through Village 7 of the Otay Ranch within a I
planned open space corridor. Through Village 7, the trail will be constructed of
decomposed granite or concrete and will be ten feet in width. As the trail extends
under the SR-125 Tollway, the trail will be constructed of concrete and traverse
the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) within an open space corridor. Through
subsequent planning of the EUC, it may be warranted to provide both concrete
and decomposed granite trail segments to provide for joggers as well as
rollerbladers, strollers or other non-motorized recreational activities with wheels.
The Village Greenway as it passes through the Eastern Urban Center will provide
a major trail connection that not only enhances mobility, but also provides an
opportunity in the Eastern Urban Center for both residents and employees of the
EUC to recreate. The Village Greenway would be designed to connect
significant park and open space uses in the EUC and provide both active and
passive users opportunities to stop and enjoy the experience through an
enhanced open space paseo.
59
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Aj}ril~~Julv 30, 2003 I
The Village Greenway will cross Eastlake Parkway on a pedestrian bridge at the
southwest corner of Village 11 and continue as a decomposed granite trail within
an open space buffer on the north side of Hunte Parkway, until it crosses Hunte
Parkway by pedestrian bridge to connect with the Greenbelt trail extending along
the westerly edge of Salt Creek.
Trail Issues
· Due to the natural terrain and native habitat along Wolf Canyon, there are
concerns that users would encroach into native habitat areas.
· Use of the access road as a trail would need to be negotiated with property
owners until the Wolf Canyon open space is conveyed to the Otay Ranch
Preserve.
· Implementation of the trail through the EUC may be required to be unique and
different, due to the urban nature of this planning area.
· The design of grade-separated crossings (underpass or overpass) of La
Media Road and Main Street/Rock Mountain Roads for the Village Greenway
will require further roadway alignment and SPA grading analyses to
determine the best type of crossings.
· A university site has been identified south of the Eastern Urban Center
although the specific design has not been determined. Trail routes and
connections should be considered in future planning of the university site.
· Connecting trail links to adjacent villages in Otay Ranch are encouraged;
however, environmental constraints in Wolf Canyon may limit the number and
location.
+mil- Greenbelt Recommendations I
· Provide signs along the Wolf Canvon corridor for a native trail and to #1at
advise users to stay on the path.
· Enlist an organization to function as trail user patrol that would voluntarily
police the trail.
· Place a post and rail fence along both sides of the utility road to restrict
access off of the trail and discourage off trail cycling.
· The Village Greenway trail is proposed to extend through the Wolf Canyon
open space; however, if it is infeasible to place the multi-use trail through Wolf
Canyon the trail should be designed as close as possible to Wolf
Canvonalong the edge of the Wolf Canyon open space or within Village 2 and
3 of the Otay R::mch andte connect from La Media Road to the Otay Valley.
60
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Finai DraftApril2tJulv 30, 2003 I
· Provide a grade-separated trail crossing (underpass or overpass) at Main
Street/Rock Mountain Road to connect to the east/west Otay Valley
Greenbelt Trail.
· A future multi-use trail should be located to and within the University site and
connecting to the Eastern Urban Center to provide a trail for students and
employees. The design will be coordinated through the development process
of the university.
· Connecting trails from adjacent residential areas should be sensitively
designed to minimize environmental impacts.
5.2.8 Bayfront Segment
The Bayfront Segment extends from the Sweetwater Marsh, a National Wildlife
Preserve, and north to 1-5, at the Sweetwater River (Figure 18). The Bayfront
Segment is bordered by 1-5 on the east and the San Diego Bay on the west.
Also located along this segment are existing industrial uses, the Chula Vista
Bayside Park and Marina, and the (former) Western Salt ponds,
Greenbelt Issuesô
Proposed development and redevelopment of the Bayfront wilJ-I!!ill'-include
mixed uses such as residential (mid-bavfront on Iv), retail, commercial,-aA€I hotel
uses and other marine related uses. As this area redevelops. the Citv and other
aoencies should coordinate tReanv open space and trail corridors to ensure
connectivitv and preservation of tRe natural wildlife areas where appropriate.
Existino and Proposed Trail
The Bayfront includes a segment of the
Bayshore Bikeway, a regional bikeway
that is planned to provide a paved multi-
use pathway for cyclists and
pedestrians from the pathway along the
Embarcadero and Seaport Village in
San Diego to Coronado with a
connection across the Say via the ferry.
The connection to the Bayfront, from
National City to the north and Imperial
Beach to the southwest has not been
constructed; however, construction is
expec{od to begin in late 2002has Bayshore Bikeway to Imperial Beach
beoun on a twelve foot wide paved
pathwav with a bridoe across the Sweetwater River Flood Channel. extendino to
E Street at Bav Boulevard. Tho Bayshoro Bikeway is proposed as a 1:\'Ielve foot
61
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DranApr¡I·2~Julv 30, 2003 I
wide p3ved pathway with 3 bridge overcrossing 3t S'Neetwater Ri'Jor 3djacent to
Interstate 5 Freeway. The bridge will connect to an east / west regional bicycle
trail on the north side of the Sweetwater River. The BikO'o·.'()Y '....ill then extend
south 310ng the '/lest side of the Freew3Y to connect to Bay Boulevard.
A second multi-use trail~ follows along the bayside of the Bayfront area,
Conceptuallv. aA twelve foot wide paved multi-use path mav extend throuqh the
Mid-Bavfront property and throuQh the Port District lands to the south connectinq
existinq and proposed open space/parks. then connectinq back with the
Bavshore Bikewav alonq Bav Boulevard at J Street begins at the north end of
B3yside P3rk. This tr3il is proposed to extend 310ng side the bay and m3rin3,
along the edge of the restaurants and retail shops bordering Marina Parkway.
Once past the rectaurants the trail would enter the GOuth end of Bayside Park
f{)lIowing the B3Y and connecting to the B3yshore Bikeway at J Street Bayside
Park could serves as a staging area with amenities ranging from playgrounds,
sand volleyball, picnicking. and restrooms.
Trail Issues
· There is currentlv limited space for a multi-use trail behind the commercial I
services bordering the Marina Parkway.
· Determine use of abandoned railroad tracks for trail or secure alternate route
along bayfront.
· Determine specific routing of trail with property owners for segments within
San Diego Gas and Electric Facility and the Western Salt Works processing
plant
TfaiJ-Greenbelt Recommendations I
· Coordinate with property owners to plan and develop a trail system along the
entire Bayfront by integrating trails within all future development plans.
· Coordinate with CAL TRANS>-BM SANDAG and the Port District to integrate I
the construction of the Bayshore Bikeway into future plans for trails along the
Bayfront.
· Coordinate efforts with San Diego Gas and Electric and Western Salt Works
to locate the trail along the edge of their facilities.
5.3 Greenbelt +FaU-Segmem-Summary I
Most of the Greenbelt is alreadv preserved as natural open space or as an active
public or commercial park facilitv. The onqoinq effort to develop parks within the
Otav River Vallev Reqional Park planninq effort will offer the communitv and
reqion additional open space and park facilities. Trails throuqh these open space
areas and parks, Many of the tmil segments are already installed and
62
City of Chura Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Ä¡)ri~2-tJuiy 30, 2003 I
operational. Others may have missing links or have substandard widths or
surface. A listing of each segment follows on Table 5. Each of the segments
has been further divided into sub-segments. Estimated costs for each sub-
segment based on length and the type of trail surface is also noted on the table
to provide a basis of the cost to construct or refurbish. Also included in Table 5
are sub-segment lengths, anticipated user types, trail surface, and maintenance
responsibility. The Otay Valley Regional Park East and West Segments will be
further modified through adoption of the OVRP Trails Master Plan under separate
cover. Additionallv. parks, open space and trails will be modified throuqh
adoption of development plans for the Mid-Bavfront and the Port DistricUChula
Vista Bavfront Master Plan properties.
63
'" 00 '<:f'<Da:;:ICOO co'<;tco'¢ CO...;tNCD<OOroO
- en 00 Oa>CO'<;tO o:::rOCD-q COOO)('i)t--CON'V
0...; 0'" I.ONOOCO Ol{')..--~ .....1.Of"--C"')C"')o,).....CO
CO'" o)ci~IliO)- Ili 0) M-Ili ""ai~~ÑM¡-..:lÓ
roc"" U C ~'" foI7..................... ..-- tß-ffl-ffi ~OO~~~~.....
-roo ..... ëã ... ",- õ~~~~ vt--- ocod!;oooo~
,~o: 0 _0 _000
<>::;¡ en 0..- coaõoo o OCH.o CO (DO _NNO<DO
> N ::J .8 ON OC\l(DCDO CDOçt')CO C"10-Lt)I"--LONLOO
~
~2å .Þ>. '" - 0- 0)_ r- "'_ D_ O> - - - C')-O)..... cDr--..-criN-CO_
-..- _0 C"? 0
en;:: CO'" 0)1.0"":0<0 o m CD..... <D.....ffl-N'<tl'-'¢<D
=>",,,,, C)- ~~ .....0"'00> O.....ffl-..... "'''' .....f:ß-Eß-..........
.cro~ ""'" (ß-NNC')C') ""'" ~ '" "'''''
ü::;::¡ 0 '" (ß-w-&<)Y')- '" '"
Õ.=:7 U ""
:>.Q)Mj
-L>-L o~ NM'<:f'O>lO O)Nv...... "¢N.....CO('i)lOmD
ü~~ J: - C\i"": "":"":""':""':N ~~ .-: N
_en
"''''
c=
C9", '" E
ro oJ ~
~
0
ëij
c
¡:¡: -EeL »
'" üü
._ en cþ z-.~--~ þ
.. '"
::;:0:: ~ c c: c: 00 c: c««« ««««««00
=:" gg~£5 5000
'" 0 000000"-"-
uu UUUUU üII.I. IIIIIIUU
'" .,; - .,; - .,; -
IJ en ";",
;:) a> V> V> a> V> V> a> V> V>
0 "a>" "a>" "a>" a> "
C"~ (l) C"~ ( ) C"~ Q) ~Q)
¡:: WaJO- WaJO- WaJO- aJO-
IJ
0::: '" J'J J'J a>
<> J'J '¡:
W .. '¡: '¡: '¡: ~
l- t '" ~ '"
0 ::J a, 0> ~ C9
< II) 0 0 0 0
100:::
w< '" ~ ~ ~ ~
...JJ: a.
mO >.
I- a> a> a> a> ..-
<l- V> V> V> V> <n
I-Z ¡ii :¡> :¡> :¡> :¡>
~ "" "" "" ""
W I- :¡ :¡ :¡ :¡
:¡¡ :¡; :¡; :¡; :¡;
C)
W "Ò
IJ C>:
~" ð
...J a> '" "
-0 '"
< "'C>: "" Õ
~'" a>
0::: a>_ i!' -0
I- a> ,- U 1ñ~
ê}¡::§
en :2U)CO a> a> a>~
<.> E "" -!""
- ~ro ~ g '"
C -00. ~ o Q) Q) 0..
'" lQ.....oo .e a> ~ _
E uQ)-- mU).c~ ~ 0 ~ü5 J'J
" >.Q)mro Oc:U-c -oro-o~5:~Þ§
'" '" (j.P([)Q) D::::Q)C(13
'" 0 c: en ::J ::J >.a.~a.. a:::Ia:::ro G.ëñI
en C>: o ~ c c: a>0 a> ..... U).9 u .........
, -5 ~ :ß - o.-ã. ~ ro
.c '" '" .- 0 Q) Q)-O ~Q;~-
::J ~ a> -~= ~-ª= ~ > ::J'- C c:.... ~ (IJ E E'EZ'"
(f) .§~ :¡;;;;(ij(ijC>: ",:I: " <uO ro ~~>-:::> UJ
.....- O)I D:::(f ...J 0- Q)
" aJO> - oo,þ.þã) .9~c:o c: u >'ð:: ... O.c 3:
ro·!: C
C '" --cc:J g c=:;:' o ro rn- u-
rno-u roc( )
.. NO> E rn ro ( ) ( ) r:::n t-cuo_ g;;;O,ë.~"C "'''''
.EQ$ Q) Q)Üü·- (L(/)a:::~
en 0-(1) 0> ~~.s.s~ :Jo.sE~a:::a:::~
- '" g.s.sž.
C - 00 (f) g>g>Q)Q)~ 0_ ,.,:~a. Q) fò~
'" C -- "" O"C"C .s15°02t)õ~
E " "" ,- ,- C) C) ro~~-5
E '" '" ~ ~~:g:g.s "Ooxoc~ ~
'" ;;: 0 .. ~O::O::æ a::: a::: ¡g:;;::E ~.9·ë
'" CO a>'" 11. û5û5~~~
II) " ~rn iã - o >- >-0:: ~~Ücr:.9.9~~
(f) rn rn Q) Q) C a:::~~(I) -
CD~ c: ~~Q)Q)~ C
~ '" c roroQ)(I)~~~()
'¡¡¡ '" a> c 0 cc:.::..::.« E ~~~~ " »C~Q)Q)(Lc
~ - ~ 0 '6> o o en en E t- ro Q) Q) U ro
I- .. 000 aJaJ;;:;;:(ij CO .2> 0 0 r:::n t- t- 0 t... t....- a:::
~ .e", '" '" CO oo..c...Jüüc. >-
V> N 0:: rorooo,þ In :2t)t)~ '" t)t)j >-__ E >-Æ
'" iù'~ ~ NN__c: .000 In
'" '" rnro==Q) ã; 00 rn roroCü >-rnCü
;;: aJO- - õ:ã3;;;u ~D:D:a:: "" D:D:IõenenôÕ>
.. " '"
In ~ 0> '"
~ ~ .0-'-: ~ ç...j('<"j-.:iLri<ór--:oom
'" -,-:ç...j '" -'-:ç...j('<"j-.iLri <X)(J')T""T"" U T""T""T""T""T""T""T""T""
;;: '" c -
0 ;;: .. iã
...J In In In
~ Nill~ OV V O~O~ rovmo 0000000
o M~O NO 0 _~_~ Nv~O m~v~~~W
- O. <D~M~l{)~ O)~Lq L{)~ ( )... OJ - ......lC':I.M.ID. I'---.LO.<D_O> M_<D.t--.
oë <DNO> 1'---0> 0> =Q)=ro 1'---U1<D0> ¡-"'V~~ONt--
SCM ._ . .....~~ ~~ ~ EWE~ ~~~~ ~""''''''ON'''''~
OO~O ~~- ~OO 00 0 -~-2 0000 O~~O~~O
.>-~~ U~WO ONØ oro 0 8E8 <DCONO OOO~OOO
I....~.. 2. Zl;1.O.o. v.q v. v:Jo IJ?00. 1'--. 0. "tg~O'>::ä:~C\I_
co "'¡- _ >oU .t--o coo co o::iEå Nomo It) _ _¿; _ .lO
~ooM ø~ N-.:to) U10) l{) L{) 0 V"'" NO> l{).....C\I t--NU1
..c co c> MY).................... .......... .................... .....O>C"? aLl)..-
Ü 0 M tß- (ß-E:0'7 EA- Eß- EA- EA-tR-EA-EA- WNN vNtR-
:2 '5 0 tR- (17(;1)- EI}{h
Õ==~
.2:'~'1' .....MN ON 0 0 <D C>F'-COO> CO 1.0 N.......... MCO
Gi~ £~ ~..........~ ~ ~ ~ . . ...... ........... ~~
Q.) C!l- Q) Q)
,'ñ « c: ==
v;:::: mE
co -I ~
~
o
ro _
c >g»»>
~ ~~ ~~~ ~O 0 0 0 0000 ~~~~Ü~~
~= 000 O~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ OOOO~OO
~~ III IO 0 0 0 0000 £~££~£~
0a.00a.00
.,
U) :ß 00- rn :ß - 00 f/) iii en
::::) :JQ)-c __0 (1)-0 Q)-o
O"~ Q) æ ~ ~ Q) ~ Q)
wm~ >_ m~ m~
Q) 2 222 Q) gz"E
u ·2 '2~'2 ~ ~Q)
~ ~ :ß- ~~~:ß-=- t5o~~
~ (9 ~~ (9(9(9~~ g 8>
(/). ro I- . . . có ~ 0 CD ro
o >_ ooo>c -oa
Q) ,- =~ .--- ~
C. rn CIJ '- ro ro ro '-
>. '- ....1- ........... I-- If)
1-; ;""ê ;;;~ (J) V)
._ ~ ~:J ~~~I- ~
e ~ ~~ ~~~ro ~
t-"S ::i-g "S"S"S~ "S
::; ::;ro ::;::;::;0:: ::;
.>:
'" æ
~ CL
0) <:I U) Þ
±;;:~a::: Þ c:
00 u.. .-::J
O)OO~ ~~ 0 <:I
~~.::.:: .£9 ~ 0 ~
ororo 0-- >. ^"
...J...J c: ro u..
I>.>. Q5=> 0- '"
.t:ro!9 >.t: C)
U - 0 ;> u .... !Y 1i.í
c: 0 .9 c: 0) .;:: 0)
.!! t2 0.9 _ro ~ 0) :?
c: - 0) >.a::: .3 I ~
G) '::'::0)- ro>. _ 0 _
E Q±;;:~ ~ro 0 - _ c: >.
....00 ~- - W 0) ro
a roO)~ roO - ~ ~ E ë ~ ~~
G) a..~::J 0..0 ~ !:!! 0 C) Q) -c 0000
~ .t:oO u- 0) - a::: 0) E ro~ ~ w~~ ....
~ " I I .- <:I - C '" en ..... CL,..., - 0) ;> _ 0)
- .... a. a::: 0) CI) -~" ro .... - >
~ m{5-ð [2 ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~~~> û3~~ ~~æ
"C ~æ2 ô~ £ "'~ ~ ~ ¡;- ~",U)&E' roE~CDD(9D ~~2
c: ~a:::u..::J 00<:1 > ro ~ oroO --ro
~ ~.::.::.9~....ro ~ ro c: > Wro_.- oenU)_--~
O'::'::U > 0)0 .... 0 c >.<:10 -ooO)O)O)~
W _.U.e: ~- -~a::: ~.::.:: ~ CI) oroO)- ~__O)~~O)
- >...5 - 0 en c: a. ro Q) f!! - ~ ~ <:I _ _.b - - Q)
~ - ~ 8:. 8:. -a::: ~ ::::I 1Il 1õ CL a::: "2 -t: en ~ .9 æ æ en en en 3:
E t:;> .c>'oo.::.::.cOO >. >. ëñro...Ja::: _........-,wwU)
a ~ -g-5eð~a.. g~ 6!9 ~ ~ þCL.sen E ~û5û5.9.9.9.s
(þ CD a..·!=m....ro.5::! ro~ "ÕJ 0 ro .! ·00~~ï5 CI) .Prorow--w
UJ CI) Q)1D:::>.0)...Ja._a:::_ CI).... > .>--= Q5roNQ) E U)EEoð~~Q)
en -:::>. 1..-- a. >. E - >. ro D:: Q) >. :;J ..... ""== t1) c: rn .... .... .P
.- t: 1..-- ro a. ro >. 00 ro Q) ~ ro ~,~ f/) , ~ CI) -- -º -º ....... -- -- U)
œ w ::Jro~::>__~____ ~ 0 _ u c:roa:::m en rororooU)en
~ J I~ _00_0'00 =...J 0 C ::>WU)...J _ ~CLa..u)-,-,W
j O~N M~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~cio..... g NM~~~~~
>0 C\ C\ c\ C\lN C\ >0 N C\I >0 NNMM ~ M('1MMMM('1
.B .B.B ns
000 CD
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftAprH,21Julv 30, 2003 I
5.4 Greenbelt Maps
Fiqure 11 Tho following mGp represents the entire groonbelt Greenbelt open
space and trails(Figure 11 ). The followinq seven maps (Fiqure 12-18)/\t tho end
of this document thore 3re seven mGpc th3t jndividually illustrate each of the
segments of the Greenbelt (Figures 12 through 19). Each map is intended to
show the recommended open space corridor through each segment and the
existing or proposed trail alignment through the open space. Each segment map
overlaps in order to orient the reader to the open space corridor and to show
where the open space corridor connects to provide a continuous greenbelt and to
identify trail connections. Existing staging areas are shown on the map. There
are no additional staging areas shown; however, as development (including
parks) within and adjacent to the Greenbelt occurs and opportunities for future
staging areas present themselves, the city should consider their construction
consistent with standards contained herein. It is anticipated with the completion
of the Otay Valley Regional Park there will be staging areas developed to
accommodate the park and trail usage.
56
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft Apr#-2-1Julv 30, 2003 I
Greenbelt Master Plan Map (Figure 11) I
57
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftAPfil~Julv 30, 2003 I
Chapter 6
Implementation
The purpose of this chapter is to identify possible strategies for implementation of
the Plan. Principally, additional the open space within the Greenbelt could be I
obtained through: acquisition of privately owned land for open space, dedication
of land for open space through the MSCP, or dedication of land as part of the
approval process of a development proposal, such as a Specific Plan,
Subdivision Map or other discretionary permit
Much of the Greenbelt open space is currently preserved through public
ownership, open space dedication, or due to environmental constraints that limit
future development, such as flood plain, steep slopes, or sensitive biological
habitat Some parcels along the Otay Valley Regional Park focused planning
area are currently in private ownership and open space connectivity through
these areas will be evaluated in confirmation with future development.
Other than trail construction by a developer through the specific plan or
subdivision process, construction of additional trails outside of these areas would
generally occur as part of a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) through publicly
owned-land or through dedication of trails from privately-held land. All trail
construction proposals will be subject to environmental review consistent with
CEQA.
The City may utilize anyone of these tools or a mixture of tools for acquisition
and/or implementation of the Greenbelt system. The ultimate mix of
implementation tools will involve City staff, property owners, developers, elected
officials and others. There are a number of mechanisms that may be used for
acquisition, construction, and on-going maintenance based on whether the open
space is publicly or privately owned. These mechanisms are further discussed in
this chapter.
6.1 Public and Privately Owned Open Space
6.1.1 Publicly-owned Open Space
Publicly owned land includes lands owned by water and sewer districts, school
districts, and other semi-public agencies, as well as those lands owned by I
individual cities and counties, the Port District, resource agencies such as the
California Department of Fish and Game, United States Fish and Wildlife
Service, National Wildlife Refuge and other federally-owned land, such as
Bureau of Land Management and the Cleveland National Forest.
58
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-AprH-2tJulv 3D, 2003 I
6.1.2 Private-owned Open Space
Privately owned land within the Greenbelt includes such uses as the Bonita Golf I
Course, Auld priv3to !: Golf CBourse,-s, private recreation centers such as the
water park in the Otay River Valley (Knott's Soak City), and individual
residences, homeowners associations, industrial and commercial uses. Some
privately owned land might be owned by an individual land conservancy for the
protection of natural resources. The City may require, as a condition of approval,
of a private developer to preserve open space and/or reserve areas for future
trails or construct trails within the development. Depending on the agreement
with the City, the open space and/or trails may be maintained by a homeowners
association or by the City.
6.2 Acquisition, Development and Maintenance Funding
Greenways and trails offer a variety of benefits to the community, including
economic development, health opportunities, open space preservation,
transportation links, recreation, cultural preservation, education, natural resource
conservation, as well as others. Funding programs are offered for a variety of
benefits and the trail manager or park manager should be creative in his
approach to pursuing funding programs. Implementation of the Greenbelt
requires funding for acquisition, development (construction, signage, staging
areas, etc), and ongoing management and maintenance, Funding programs
frequently only fund for a specific benefit or a specific category. Various funding
programs are described below,
6.2.1 Acquisition of Greenbelt Open Space and Trails
State and Federal Grant Fundinq for Open Space
The City may pursue acquisition of these open space areas containing sensitive
habitat and/or species using a variety of methods including for habitat
conservation through state and federal funding programs, such as Coastal
Conservancy grants, Habitat Conservation Fund, etc,. In most instances, open
space acquired through grant programs or bonds can only be used for habitat
conservation; however, trails can be considered to be compatible uses within
these areas. Significant acreage within the Otay Valley Regional Park has been
acquired through state funding sources. The majority of the City's MSCP opens
space will be conserved through existing public lands through dedication of open
space as part of the land development process. However, a small component of
the MSCP opens space will be comprised of private landholdings which would be
set aside of portion of the most sensitive lands in exchange for development
along the less sensitive areas remaining.
59
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Ä¡}rfl21Julv 30, 2003 I
Impact Fees
The City requires impact fees for the acquisition and development of public parks
through the Park Dedication Ordinance (PDO), where "turn-key" parks are not
developed as part of large master planned residential developments; however,
land acquired through this funding source is typically targeted to serve local
public park needs and seldom natural and passive open space. Trails would be
considered consistent with the range of active park uses targeted for local
parkland acquired through this funding source. While PDO funds are commonly
used to fund local parkland acquisition, funding for trail construction could be set-
aside in an account established for that purpose.
Donations and Dedications
Natural Heritage Preservation Tax Credit - Land and conservation easements
may be dedicated for open space, parkland, wildlife corridors and cultural
resources in exchange for tax credit equal to 55% of fair market value. The State
Wildlife Conservation Board administers the program.
Williamson Act Contracts
Land for open space or trail use may be set aside for a period of time (30 years)
in exchange for a reduction in property tax, Generally Williamson Act contracts
have been primarily used for agricultural use but they may be used to retain open
space in its natural state for the period of the contract.
Voluntarv Dedication
An individual property owner may desire to dedicate open space for preservation
or a portion of their property for a trail. The City may elect to construct and
maintain the trail upon acceptance of an irrevocable offer of dedication.
Mandatorv Exaction
When there is a crucial link to connect trail segments or a trail is identified on an
adopted trails map or master plan, a mandatory exaction may be required in
conjunction with a request for a discretionary development permit from the public
agency. An example might be a requirement to dedicate land for the
construction of a trail as a condition of approval for a Conditional Use Permit for a
proposed major recreation land use. In lieu of land dedication, in some
circumstances an easement can be recorded to the City to ensure public access
for trail purposes
Income tax deductions
A federal income tax deduction may be allowed when a property owner conveys
land as a gift to a public agency or a non-profit organization for public purposes
such as a trail or open space.
60
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft Apr-II 21Julv 30, 2003 I
6.2.2 Design and Construction Funding
Grant Funds and Reimbursement Fund Proqrams
Identifying where opportunities exist for trails is as much a challenge as is
determining how to implement a trails plan once it is adopted. In the past, grant
funds have been limited to trail design and construction. Responding to
recreational and open space needs of a growing population and expanding
communities, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (TEA)
was reauthorized in 1998 as TEA-21. TEA-21 or the Transportation Equity Act
for the 21st Century authorizes funds for transportation programs over a 6-year
period from 1998-2003. Programs include funds directed at improvements for
Transportation Enhancements (TE), Bicycle Transportation and Pedestrian
Walkways, Recreational Trails, and Conservation Lands.
In San Diego, the regional allotted funds of ISTEA and TEA-21 funds have been
primarily allocated to regional trail projects that benefit a wide geographic area.
One of these regional projects is the Bayshore Bikeway, a paved Class I bicycle
path (a designated path separated from the roadway) that, when completed, will
extend from downtown San Diego south along the Bayfront in Chula Vista then
west to Imperial Beach winding around the South Bay to Coronado. San Diego
Association of Government (SANOAG) is the lead agency for developing a trail
with Tea funds along a levee within the salt flats connecting along the Bay
connecting to Imperial Beach and Bayshore Bikeway in Coronado. This project
will link to the trail along the Bayfront and connection to the Bayshore Bikeway.
Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond
Act of 2000 (Proposition 12) provides $10 million for non-motorized trail projects
of which all but $1_7 million are programmed. Possible expenditures include
hikers, biking, and other means of non-motorized means of transportation and
recreation. The program favors projects that fund the construction of high-priority
trail segments using matching or in-kind contributions, innovative partnerships or
solutions.
Other programs that may be utilized for developing the Greenbelt and its ef-tAe I
trails system include:
· California Recreation Trails Program
· Habitat Conservation Fund
· Land and Water Conservation Fund
· Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (part of the TEA
program)
· Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program (technical
assistance)
61
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft~Apr.I~1July 30, 2003 I
· California Greenways Creative Grants Program.
· AB 2766 Air Pollution Control District Funds
· National Recreation Trails Act,
· California 2000 Bond Act,
· Roberti-Z'berg-Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation Program
· Riparian and Riverine Habitat Grant Program
· Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (program geared toward promoting
healthy communities)
Applications for specific grants require an analysis of whether the type of grant
request meets the grant program guidelines. Many of the grant programs are
tailored specifically for acquisition, design, construction, or maintenance or a
combination of these, Air Pollution Control funds are principally targeted for
programs that reduce vehicle trips and therefore fund for alternative
transportation projects and bicycle facilities which meet the state or federal
standards for multi-use paths, Whereas, the Recreation Trails grant focuses on
trail usage for pleasure and allow more flexibility in the design. The
Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program, administered by the
California Resources Agency, is a mitigation tool for transportation projects. The
program may be applicable for mitigation of the road widening of Proctor Valley
Road or the construction of SR 125.
6.2.3 Maintenance Funding
Parks. :md T!rails and open space within the Greenbelt that are owned by a I
homeowners association (HOA) will be maintained by the HOA. Trails through
Eastlake Trails, Rolling Hills Ranch and San Miguel Ranch will be maintained by
tAe-individual HOA§. Maintenance of the trails through public open space areas
will be maint::¡inod the responsibilitv ofby the City or by-the agency that owns the
land, unless a maintenance aqreement assures this differentlv~ (See Figure 19),
The Citv shall coordinate with individual HOAs to ensure that Greenbelt trails
remain connected and that basic maintenance responsibilities continue to occur.
Greenbelt Mmaintenance of tmils is essential to ensure that the system remains I
an asset to the community. There are few grant programs that offer grant funds
for maintenance. Generally, maintenance costs are allocated through the
General Fund and when there is a reduced General Fund budget, maintenance
of parks and trails may suffer. Maintenance. specificallv for-Bf the trail system" I
can be accomplished through a variety of sources in addition to maintenance
provided by the public agency. Volunteer programs can provide maintenance of
the trails. In order to manage a volunteer program or revenues generated for
maintenance, a trail manager is necessary. The following possible sources may
be used for generating maintenance revenues or used for trail maintenance:
. Advertising - outdoor shelters, benches
62
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftAprj~&tJuly 30. 2003 I
· Corporate Sponsorship
· Special Events - Fund rides, time trails, etc.
· Franchise Fees - Food stands, bike lockers, bike rental/repair at staging
areas and/or parks
· Urban Corps of San Diego - This organization provides young adults job
training, education, and community service opportunities. The Urban
Corps' "Public Service Conservation Works Program" offers services for
trail construction and maintenance, erosion control, brush management,
revegetation and public landscaping.
· California Conservation Corps (CCC) is a state agency that engages
young persons in meaningful work, public service, and educational
activities providing services to communities and they have conducted trail
maintenance and construction.
· User Fees - Typically the City charges user fees paid for the use of
campgrounds, active playing fields, and other day use fees. A user fee for
trail usage would be difficult to collect and enforce unless each trail was
gated and fenced for its entirety. However, a volunteer collection
mechanism may be implemented whereby a user box is installed at
various trailheads. Fees are collected via the honor system.
· Developer Fees
· Corporate Funding
· Fundraising events
63
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft"Al'ril"21Julv 30, 2003 I
Chapter 7
Consultation
In preparing the Greenbelt Master Plan a variety of sources of information
contributed to its content. The following is a listing of documents and individuals
that were consulted in the preparation of the Plan.
1. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, "Regulatory
Negotiation Committee on Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed
Areas, Final Report", September 30,1999,
2, California, State of, The Resources Agency, Department of Parks and
Recreation, California Outdoor Recreation Plan 1993, April 1994,
3. Brookfield Shea Otay, LLC, "Otay Ranch SPA, Village Eleven SPA Land
Use Districts", March 30, 2001.
4" Chula Vista, City of, Chula Vista General Plan, Land Use Element, July
11, 1989, Reprinted September 5, 1995.
5. Chula Vista, City of, Landscape Manual. November 1994.
6. Chula Vista, City of, Draft Parks & Recreation Master Plan, August 2000.
7" Cinti Land Planning, "Eastlake III Specific Planning Area," February 20,
2001"
8. Dudek & Associates, Draft Proqram Environmental Impact Report, Salt
Creek Interceptor Sewer and Wolf Canvon Trunk Sewer. Volume I - EIR,
prepared for the City of Chula Vista, February 2001"
9" Hofmockel, Mary, City of Chula Vista, May 21, 2000.
10" Federal Highway Administration and the National Recreational Trails
Advisory Committee, "Conflicts on Multi-Use Trails: Synthesis of the
Literature and State of the Practice",
11. MNA Consulting, Draft Citv of Chula Vista Multiple Species Conservation
Proqram (MSP) Subarea Plan, prepared for the City of Chula Vista,
September 11, 2000"
12" Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan,
64
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final Draft-Apri~é1July 30, 2003 I
September 11, 2000.
13. Otav Vallev Reqional Park Concept Plan, revised draft July 18, 1997.
14. Payne, Gail, California Bicycle Coalition, Planning and Conservation
League Foundation, "Guide to Bicycle Projects and Program Funding in
California", February 2002
15_ Recon, Number 3434E, Environmental Opportunities and Constraints
Analvsis for the Sweetwater Bike Path, February 14, 2001
16. San Diego, City of and Merkel and Associates, Draft Western Otav Vallev
Reqional Park Natural Resource Manaqement Plan, April 2001
17_ Trimark Pacific San Miguel LLC, "San Miguel Ranch SPA Plan", October
19,1999.
18. "The Impact of the Brush Creek Trail on Property Values and Crime",
Sonoma State University, 1992.
19. "Who's at Fault: Trail Liability 101", National Trails Symposium, Laura A.
Reimche, Staff Counsel, California Department of Parks and Recreation,
September 23, 2000.
20. U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, National
Bicvclinq and Walkinq Studv, Case Study No.7, ''Transportation Potential
and Other Benefits of Off-Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities", January
1992.
21_ U_S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Final
Report National Bicycling and Walking Study, Transportation Choices for a
Changing America".
22_ U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Conflicts on
Multiple-Use Trails, Svnthesis of the Literature and State of the Practice,
August 1994.
23_ Dean Ziegler, Bonita Horseman, July 9,2001
24. San Diego Association of Governments, Reqional Transportation Plan,
2000_
25. San Diego, City of, "San Diego Bicycle Attitude Survey", 1995_
65
City of Chula Vista
Greenbelt Master Plan
Final DraftApril-2-tJulv 3D, 2003 I
Greenbelt Segment Maps I
66
,-- II Ho~ \i
. ~
~ ~
~^.., ì
¡ ,
i "
II
/1"
/
i,,;
ii;¡&~
"'" ~'I
l' t:-<, J' : "
r- -.! '-"> ~. "
-; ~ ~
I ~ '.
;;:J
ì'tt:; ,
M U r~_
'--.. ¡; ,
-j I ¡, ¡I!'
\:::"I I ø: J ~. i
~ i..·....... 0 H Ii j ¡¡ ¡ ¡
~ ú. .' 0 ,... Inn
_. ~ .
I· ~ '!:
t:I.4 · '." € d i ¡
. . H' ' 1<
~ .¡
'T' ..
..... ¡, II!
~ "' ! !lfl¡. ,
= ~ ! ,.......
~ b
~ , .
.... "1 I
:> € ¡!fI¡lu, ¡
=~ 1 !!I,¡ DO
]~ ~ ~
~~ ] L
o r;¡;;¡ ~
~ ~
~ .
, ..
þ - ~I-
U Ò ~I"¡I
--- ----
¡i \/ I tl':' ,~ i N
'i' ,"0 ~
-, .-.-,- ¡ !
l I Ì w
1':' r! d ¡ ./, cr.
'-I rJ_.___.) Jí ¡ ! ilH :::>
c , C)
,If \ .~ ¡*.B ;n;: ¡¡:
,
,
,_,r\ ...~. ';,,_- I., I
, / !
\ E ¡ !
)\ ~,- \ ,
)'\\~ ~-, ì I ,
t í
~ ic ic ic
~0{~ l
Æ ! . d
\ ~. í ï!! J I
. \ ¡Da..!...·.
'"
þ
q ~ ,.
'-' ¡IUd II
1 IIOOD
: ----'\ ,i l-.__.~_______'.
!
" ..0-"
"; pi;
t;.<'
\\ \~_..';... '--.\\:-..-..,j.--...\
',' &-; '" ," ,.\
,.._..:.;\~(~{,' \"~'/' .",~-l_:;-
",'" "','", z+ 0
-.. .'.-".\\\...' .-'-.. ,.... ..-.-.-
\ ,>.~\\, í
-,., .'- .,.'.., \ '"
'i'" ;):\i~æ~{'. " '~,
",>,a, <fI' \' ~
-//1> ~ ðl\.J"
'/',1<1; ,"i'" ~
' ,/,~
-~\ . .-y
X, ,\\,~\(\\\~/\\, ""~)
ic.\'~i' ,,' '
\.,,-':)\:-,) '~---\-._...-\ \"-' ~-"--\- ..\ --/
_I{.,/..l \ \~ - \ .-:-,:::::,:..ÿ;-- -'<í -- - '\ -.~
/' \-" \. \'\ i e=t~((\,V ,- ~ ~~\
'" \ \ \ .-\--~-\ f\~\J\~:--- - \--" ,::.::::-;
\ j...ìÇ -1 \ \,~> (" ~ ~ --\ --- \ì! ---------- ...;¡
G ___, \ /\ \ \ - --- ~;:;:ç¡¡t~-
c ~ ~---,--\--<f \ _ I I--:"øfi(' ~
-!!! g \_ l------y ~ \ )~_ --"",,_ ...",...... ~- ~,þ
a
a. '" ,_-\0,~-?~ø--'¥'" )-~
~a. _~-"'~I;/ L~ - \
~<II ~...-,- 1_" \ ~
<11:2 '/''''~ 'I" '
<11_ ' '
:2c ..\-....;-"'1:,
-Q) '. . 'I-;~
CiiE -","':
.a 0>
CQ)
Q)C/)
Q)~
~ Q)
C)_ i ,.~
,<II
(1 ;:
--
<II Q)
.- Q)
> ;:
(1 C/) --",,,.,,
:;~ -..,."':::::::::::=-::
,c:Q) ;',<' '"
0;: --~--~--
_0 ---
0-'
>- ,o:Ë
"" (\ n\*~¡.~I;
0
~
;/ -' M
\' ~
"¡ß (~ W
..~ I:t:
.' ~
2::__. ,!r < C)
m~ ü:
"'>-'::';~::~:L~___ 'é'C
,¿ ,~/
,I ¡'~
'.' i ',~
'"¡' '
<:,,,:.:\:<',\\ ?,\ "\~'\.)
~l'(>' <\)\~\~,\:~;~~" '__'r.
j ! -
¡ f ~ ~ !
J' . ¡ ï'¡
1fi~i,"!~
"- "- - . \;
'i*UH..
, .
:
I . ,
; . .
, . .
~ ! f
¡ ; . ,
~~iCiCJ
. " J
. j¡ ¡
I.! i i &.. ~ <:>
~ n a .!....
I ¡ !
¡ ¡ I
= I¡" i
moo ~
.......-___1
l
<
è\
'"
'"
ð
.
c"-
.!2",
0-:2
(¡;-
_c '.
!J) 0) , ,
"'E
:20> .',
-0)
ã)(I)
.o~
c ~
0) '"
~O-
C)(ij '"
I C ð
co.Q '>
,
- 0> ~
!J) 0)
>a:
"'~
-0)
:>(;j
"';;::
0_
-0)
00)
>0;;::
Goo
.,¡-
~
w
a::
::>
CJ
ii:
1G~
<:) =....;:
~ M ~
9 :i æ
. ....
~ «t e;t
"ò> i!nIE
Q .
. -
" ~
8 ~
"
~
i
¡
.
\
~ ~
4
./ '-4,
~.3{.Yi
....-....
i!
§> .\~.i.
~ '..~.~
~::~\-:
~ -
f .........\.....~
<:) ". I ¡
"
.
. ~
\' ìc:
'~'" J8'r
1\,]
\ .
; !' .'~ ~
ã: f f ¡ :.
... ! '" )
CD r ¡ f -- '\
~o. i_a_
::¡¡<II .
-~ !
-- ¡
CD C !.£ ~
.c .. !"
c ... ...
CD E i I i
Q) en &;.::.;:\
9~ ~ ~ ~ ~
<II Q) I
-"
.!!!.!!' < ~ L
>::¡¡ ,i¡,.!I!
cu ~ ~ i:r" " "
:; ; ~ 0 II!.!~..
¡}(/) I ' - §>
- . !!:; i ,!.: G
o iii I ¡: þ.. ~
~ !wn ! ¡ íl ¡ ~
Õ II!IDDD I;: þ
c
ç~ 3}; OÐI:I
--.. --...-1:::]
~,_.. . -.-. "'''''HIJ<J
-,-" - "'-~'Y
"'-o""_'LI ~,-- - -.--
--III ---¥ -.
..--* ---.. -II '_11111111
.._-*----¥ -1:2
-- -- -- BIß
=
-
....wo.s "'.'~II.S p.... ....,., A.r1O = -, -
-=
=
-=
ì~~~~~~# ~
"
o8"'GJur>sJoK-¡unoJ '~~e;I
¡
'~~~tmlth~
~mmt{;¡:
~ dew sluaw6as ~OOJ:) lies I sa~e, ~elO
'ii!"''''- ueld JalSeW IlaquaaJD- e¡S!^ elm¡:) 10 ÃI!:>
~
<D
â ;" j ~
- ¡ . ~
~)!\l0hc,," ,i ¡ !f' ! j º
..~ . ~ I ~ 5 LL
.!' ~ ¡ icicic [ [] _
, ~.- ¡
~ ~ ~ I!
ð,~:; ¡I I I
~'~ :....
..
ë f 1
. f !
i I I I í ¡
loa. **B
_ : !¡ ! ~ ; w
,,~Lj ~ ~ J;!~
&>1-' ¡ ,!,¡J¡
" '. [] 0 I I : I
'.
.
o
z+ ~
:1~ ,C:>::'
__,ß'o:.'- ~ I
~þ ß
~ ..
R i;¡ ... 1>~1
o>~ ~'
èi:§'" I f J
\ j/
/. I I
"~ '_'.:';(!~ ~,.",.;--' I
~ ./r
p)>-"
"'..,.
",¡Jf''"-
,ød"
'~"'''''~i':''''''''~''='''l':om'''''''''''"""cO: '"
~ -
f
~
g
--
œ ..
<>..
cW ~'
œ-
œ><
Om
,,,-
..-
-"
.. c
>-5 ~
3~ 0
ð~ 'è-<"
-= ~.--.:..! ;,
~~;"';" -;'" ¿:
= >0 Q' ~ :<
us'" ,,¡,I'~
o ~ ~ ,~
, , ð ",11 ';;>
I, ('......... Ò
, IL..'\" J
ic
¡n-ç- ,....
I' ~
,~ w
" JL ~
::>
· CI
· -
o ~ U.
·
"
þ
g .
ò
! "
ò
~
;;
o
i Ii
J
~
j j
, ,
~ i 3 -,!
i z]j .5 ¡
~ ~ i f ;::J ~
'* II::¡;~ ~
~ . EI ~D
~ []
,
i
; Æ
~ ~ ~
-: Î .r
,. , '
~' , !
~ ic ,.~ ic
.
,
~ : j ~
.iE' I·il~
¡ ñ ~ . 1<1 ~
': ! r i ~ ¡
~ ii I 8- ~ l
ð ¡¡¡ wI" -
i OH;: ð
_ Z, '
11 . j
ï ~ ¡ ';
, I 10
_ t
.
"
g
i. ~
H' , ".
" ' .;' ! I
1~ " ",.I'
!l
,
I I
__- "''8i.~¡
¿111I'~
,:, i Õ!
8~ 3~nÐI::J
8'0 90 1"0 z'm'oo ..·..·.,;.."'..·8 ~-"'iWO
sal!y.¡ -- .--- - ~
+ ~-- --. -..:~ -¿II\'"
--¡I 1111 II --_. .¥- "'-.! '::'::'''''''
-. -:.,-:'-
--ID -'c:::I
g--O
N --.-. .-
---- ..~::! =
-__* -c -._-
-- -- --
"""""
Yr'
........-
--~
ii:eS' o6a!o· ues
~
I
c
,
oD"(þUVffoÁ:lQ
deVIl ¡uaw6as ¡UOJIÁeg
ueld Ja¡SeVII ¡laquaaJ!)- e¡S!^ eln4:> 10 Ál!:>
0>
:-1 5 T""
,+; ~'l#JJI' w
I ~¡J!!~ I g¡
, C>
. ¡¡:
"
. < ,,/
< II lit /
;1· !~.I; \ '
~ _¡ -I ' I
Iii ~E.5 ;1 -:: '¡ I 1
'i!!i :!' :!' -- 5j ! I I \
0' ,_' I ' l-
I ." I ~
, 'I--[I!I'J<""'>; ./., -!
\ I \ - I I <!
, ,,"<
\ \ "
(' - -\ \ j'
, /
, I ,- -
I' 1 ' '
; \ \,' 1/
\ ,I \ __I
\' ,,/ '-- ''-I - "
" ,,p, 7¡,"
;)' ',," \s, rf!/' %\! ...,
I \ \-17 10 ~ \ -
I ' ,\"(,\ <).' ...
. , &,.' .--:
"I '. f""" -- ,.
, ~, ,,0' -..
I t~\,\ , , ''''II "" \ ,---' /'
I, i <-I "%"
t...-:" \ '<' \/
i-II 'ì\; ,--I I t-' ~
, \ \ \ ' ~
/1 I ' \ \ \ I- ~
,i I', (', \ E ¡¡¡
I . " ,\' ,
\ I \ + I I j ~
I I " c
I \ - /, \, /: §,
~ _ 7" I \ . .
r /"" I' ~
__" I / \! ( " ! ¡ :.
~ \ -'7' )' '. / \ \ ! ~ ~
o \ I I I --t '-- ~_.- ' . >.
,I ' ,I'- I 'I, /'\ -\ -I; is
,1_ " ,'/¡ ,-'-~. ',/ I ' ~
8 u, 'I, ! ",.Pé ,I' ,-- -, _"- 1 . rn
I ¡-!'A ,.- -:-\!
\ \\/' \ ~I" ¡¡
, \ " \' w: . s
\ \' "I·
, ! I ~ ~
\" / \ \ ' " --) --" ~
, >' /- \ \ ,~, .
~"\"'r/! ---í -- " \ ~i I
, ,~ \" ' r j \ \ßI ,/ I . æ
\ I -,' \-
\ _Y" \ \ \ \ $' \ <!< "
II' ' ,- \' / .
c' -I , ' \--/--1ii\ ('C" -~ 1- 1 1 ~
\ I l--~ ílii¡\ \ ~/~-t"' 'i,! I ,I ~
_ ---'í I ~ \ 'Ç--"' "', \ ,,~\---,,"--- i -' g.
r" ~ '1 '\ -¡ ': 1'::\ 11 \1 ! I, / ¡
" \, ),_ ~ __ \ I I~; ,I \, ~ ¡ I ì/+ Î . ":.
ð \ II ' \ \ ~, ' \ - 'I' -- 8" 'I! \ I i'i
.. _, _\ \ \ I I
-- ,," "
t; \~ \ \ .~b>Ø'!!! - 5° \ J' L_ ,~
._ " H" , ' ," ,- I "
;, '- ~u I , \ ,'_ ,~~\.?-~--d"\~;}"-- ,_ _~ ¡ji--..------ 7- ----;:"'.---- ---:--~-~-
.s ~ \ --;¿..-/"Þ" \" ' --, ,..'
.... ,.." \ ' -.... ,-
= ,-, .-- ..- - .
..=....Z ,\ / B
U ~ -,-- I
Z f;¡;¡ , ,.
'ë; f;¡;¡ ~
>. ~ .... ~, 0 .
..... ~ ~. D' $
,- ,,' " - - '
U " .., "I, ' ' ' '
~ " .,'¡ - . "
, h ' 11 ~ ~
! ' .
. ~~~'
C) ,.-'
.c
. ,