The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRCC AGENDA PK 2001/04/23 ....j)'kAYL ,;L..; Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT NAME: South Bay Baptist Church Multi-Purpose Buildiug PROJECT LOCATION: 960 Fifth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91911 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO,: 618-062-35 PROJECT APPLICANT: South Bay Baptist Church CASE NO,: IS-00-53 DATE: April 23, 2001 A. Project Setting The site is a 3,02±-acre property located on the west side of Fifth Avenue between Arizona Street and Moss Street (Exhibit A - Locator Map), The site is currently developed with a church building (3,054 sq,ft,), restroom building (352 sq,ft,), a two-story youth/classroom building (9,600 sq,ft,), youth activity building (1,500 sq,ft,), office trailer building (492 sq,ft,), and a storage shed (120 sq,ft,), An outdoor play/recreation area and patio are located along the north side of the youth/classroom building, The rear portion of the property (31,800 sq.ft./O,73-acre) is landscaped, The existing parking lot is striped for 82 standard parking spaces (including four handicapped spaces), An additional five parking spaces (two handicapped) are located on the north side of the youth/classroom building, A 25-foot wide paved driveway (two-lane) provides access to the main parking lot. A 14-foot wide paved driveway along the northern property line provides a secondary access to the main parking lot. The surrounding area is fully developed with the following uses: North Single-family residential; East Single-family residential; West Single-family residential; and South Multi-family residential. The southern property boundary is contiguous with the Telegraph Canyon drainage channel. The maximum weekend usage of the existing facility is on Sunday morning (10:45 a,m, - 12:15 p,m, worship service) with 185 people in the sanctuary, youth house, and Christian Education Building, The maximum weekday usage of the existing sanctuary and classroom building is for a 65 person pre-school program (6:30 a,m. - 6:00 p,m,) and 145 person Christian schoo] (8:30 a,m, - 3:30 p,m,), 1 ~.----, \--~~-- - -- _----\==\0 ( _ r'" "\ \ --- "' CHULA VISTA ---- ,/, ~' n_ / / ,- \ COMMUNITY - /'"~0'\Î / \\ I _\ - \:\ ~, /~ \- 3.\ ~\ \ YOUTH CENTER /,/ I \ I' '(- ,'\' \ ~\ /'"/, \ I I I ~,/"\-<\ \ '--- --\ \ -~~""^~ \ \ .~...-J.-" \0 RICE \ \ \- \ ,Y' I J::\¢,\\ ~ 'ti\ I // /0 "~ \ /' 'C;;;\ ElEMENTARY ~ \ \- ,-,< ,\/ \ \ \/,"'(/ ~ \ \--/ /~//'" \ \ I ~ '- I ~~ \ SCHOOL \ \/ '( _y ,'I I I / /'" // \ \ \ /, 'I \- '\ \ '::¡: L./ "' I \ "\ v-\ CHRISTIAN I " \ I I I ~Y- \, -\ \.-' '\v--- -v/ --- -\ \___~ \~, SCHOOL ~..J,..--·r \} J..,~..>-- ',z. \ 1/\ '\\/\ \.'\'S11't\~7-';:\ \}\\~' :\ \:::\,/Cí\í\~}\ s>~?f{\'\'(\\~\ L \i\-,~- \ /' ,,\.: /~ ,/ U,'), / I '\ I I leèe~þ>"(\ \ I í\-\~y'\ j / /"T/ r \/1\ '): \\/ -' '\;\ ,\" ~~v \J,-'I \ »~ \J-o \/~ \- \ \ Ie /~I \ ,/ ' , 'I/' \ - -~\ ' \ \ LI- - .-:- /, \ \ , " I, \ I /1,- \ I _ / \-= _ \ ,--~-'\ \ .-','.-"'^ \- - \ \ \ yy->- ~ ~ .- V\\ \ \'Ç-\\\ ~\I.rj\\\/\'\:i"\\0 \ /5 1/'\ \ ,~I/'\ \ '/,\-_\-~'\-"\\_:\-\'~fí:'1 \/'"'/í~- \ /,\= \_/\ I \/ '( \.,/ ""~~\' S~\ \-/ , \ ,/ \' -1°\1:'" '\ \ -J.-\ ~- R\t- , ,~___- - v;\/ ~~ ,P';r \ "'/þ \ \ \ 'íÎ " -- ~- \ --~ ì ß ç;/ /4 \ \ ~, \ \ \- \ /~{\ II \",;;;f~/f~I/: _-" \\~' \ \ \ \ L /\ ~ ,/ í ----\ \ ~ -- \ \"-\ //ý///?' /// / / ,\ \ \ 'I ~ \ \ __J-- .-'- \ \ c~ \ 1,/' ~í\\ \ \ u'[_[ - f/ ,/ " \! ~ /'~I/" \ \ \ ~, \ \ Y;;// 'l ß / \ \ \ \ ~ __ \ "/- " , \ ,\ '\ \ '///1/_ \~ \ \ \ ,\-/' ~\~ (í \. /\1 --,~.--- \ \ \ \~ \ ß/// // \ \ _'^ J- ~-f/ \ \ \.-- , \''0'" \ I '\--~ //, \\\, \ \--- \, \ i- ~--" \ ~v ~ ,_ ~ \ \ \ \ ~~ / \ -' ,-r\i-\j.'J ~ ,//í \ \ j:/\//\ \~ \ \0-\ \-i,1- ,-----P/ \}-h/í \ "-//' I I I,\._F /\\\ -<\ ,"1,)-,\ I / ,u.' c\:ò1 //, I, \ -:::¡;\.I _~~- I ---- ~B.~_r\ \ J.L- __ ___/ \ _/ 's- S SJ,;/ I /~,\::¡: _\/\ \ I OEL REY , ,------- 0 - \ -- \ v----- \;- \ ';...-- HIGH " \ / ~-c~- \-_' \ -"C- ~ \_\h \ ""00' - ,f" ' ,-\ r"Y\\\ \-\\\ \ /~I/'~Y:~::-f~-~:} ì)' / -\:rrL\J~\~-~ :\'/< \ ,C-" 1/ \-~'I¡\"\ \ \\-\.\== .\ ~ \ \--\' \. '~~\\'n/r\ '\\ <\ \ I % I ' \' \ \ I ~/j "\"'C~:,-~/,~' \ \ \ I \ \ \ ------^\ \ \ --\-~.- ---\ \.- \\jl \ \j/\/ \ \ -\ <? / , r\'\' o ,v' _I/''f/ \ ~\\ '',-~ /0--\-\ ""J-K / \.F' \ 0 I \ \' -f/ "Î, ---+' _ \ y)( '/j,/'íl.----F /_}\\ /-\ "ii-~~_µ/\.---þlê\ \:,C -\.~\_\~~\ \ \\\ ç //~/,:> \ \ //- ~~' Ir- ,I \ ,"'\':\ ~\ \ \ I y_ / 'ç::::-<-=-~/~~ \/\ /.-/1/'/ ///\ '\-,::\ \/~\- \ \ J-~\- ' 'Í \',-/"Í ,,J.- y ,"-,,/\ \ \ ~ 'I' 'v- I \ j \.,/// ~_J \ \ I \ 'C) /\' C" \ \ ,.:: , \- /~ \ \ \ ///F' /I/'y_ U-Î- <\\Í ), I/'" '/' ,/ \ V ' \ -"-r '\ :::j \- -, I \ ' ~'2.: '~\ \ \F'~' \.- ;CfF \ \ -- \p' \ ~--- ~1 \ '- -- J '\ ::::\ \~\ /-/~~\".~~.\~~i>\'í//.\A-{\'~\L 1\.\ \ ,I I, / OF , ' \ í 1/'1 I t\\/ / ~ J " - ~ ______ y \_ \ \ _.- ~ ~" '(:./ 1.// í/ Ie/\/\ \-~/\~/-" \ \j \ \v-~ --- \_- \ __ ,___,_,__ _________n_' ' ~ PROJECT SOUTH BAY BAPTIST CHURCH PROJECT DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: INITIAL STUDY PROJECT 960 Fifth Avenue N ADDRESS: Request: Proposed construction of a 4,730 square foot "multi- !:lEI purpose" building adjacent to the existing facility, !:lEI FilE NUMBER: No Scale LOCATOR IS _ 00-53 C:lmyfilesllocators\IS0053,cdr 06/26/00 E)(HI'rT' A B, Project Description The project proposes to amend the existing Conditional Use Pennit (P 56-4) that was approved in 1956 by the County of San Diego, The South Bay Baptist Church proposes to: I. Remove an existing mobile office (492 sq,ft, trailer) structure, a storage shed (120 sq,ft,), and an existing 1,500 square-foot youth building (fonner single-family residence); 2, Construct a new 4,730 sq,ft, multi-purpose building with a maximum height of 28 feet; and 3, Construct a new concrete walkway for access to the multi-purpose building (Exhibit B - Site Plan), The proposed new multi-purpose building would be used for Sunday and Wednesday worship services, meetings, group gatherings, and youth activities, Worship services that are currently conducted in the existing church building would be moved to the new multi- purpose building. The proposed building would contain a multi-purpose room with seating for 286 people, a storage room, restrooms, and a lunchroom (no stove or cooking appliances included), The exterior of the building would be stucco to match existing stucco on the existing buildings, Roof shingles and trim would match the existing buildings, C. Compliance with Zoning and Plans The proposed multi-use building is consistent with the R-I (Single-family Residential) zoning designation, LM (Low-Medium Residential 3-6 dulac) General Plan designation, and the City's environmental plans and policies, The project is also consistent with the Montgomery Specific Plan, which designates the site as Low-Medium Residential (3-6) dulac ), D, Public Comments On July 21, 2000 a Notice ofInitial Study was circulated to property owners within 500-foot radius of the proposed project site. The public comment period ended July 31, 2000, One public comment letter was received, E, Identification of Environmental Effects An Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including an attached Environmental Checklist fonn) detennined that although the proposed project could have a significant environmental effect, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures described in Section F below have been added to the project. The preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 ofthe State CEQA Guidelines, I. Noise The architectural plans submitted to the City do not include heating or air conditioning equipment. If heating and air conditioning equipment is installed, the equipment could 2 conceivably exceed City noise standards, Although the nOise analysis report notes that "HV AC units would be of a low-noise type and would have sufficient structural attenuation (i,e" cinder-block enclosure) to preclude impacts to surrounding residential uses," the submitted plans do not provide a basis for this conclusion, Thus, the installation ofHV AC equipment could result in a significant environmental impact. 2, Hazards Demolition of the storage shed and fonner single-family residences could result in the release of airborne asbestos fibers if the structures contain asbestos materials, Release of airborne asbestos fibers would result in a significant health hazard, F, Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Impacts Project-specific mitigation measures are required to reduce potential environmental impacts identified in the Initial Study to a less than significant level. The mitigation measures will be made a condition of approval, as well as requirements of the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment "A"), NOISE Heating and Air Condition Equipment 1. If building plans submitted to the City include exterior heating and air conditioning equipment, a City approved acoustician shall be retained by the applicant to perfonn an acoustical analysis of the heating and air conditioning equipment to detennine if the equipment meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements pertaining to nOise (see §19,68,030), The acoustical analysis shall be submitted to the City's Environmental Coordinator for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building pennit. 2. Concurrent worship services shall not be conducted in the multi-purpose building and the existing church building, The multi-purpose building shall not be used in conjunction with weekday educational programs conducted in the existing church building and the youth/classroom building located behind the existing church building. HAZARDS Asbestos 1. The applicant shall contract with an environmental ëonsultant certified by the State of California to conduct testing for the presence of asbestos in buildings to be demolished, A report shall be submitted to the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department that identifies whether or not asbestos is present. If required, a remedial work plan for the removal and disposal of asbestos shall be submitted for review and approval by the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department and San Diego County Air Pollution Control District. 3 2, The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all required permits from state and local regulatory agencies, including the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD), and shall provide proof of having obtained such permits to the Planning and Building Department prior to issuance of a demolition permit. I agree to implement the mItIgation measures required as stated in this Section (F) of this Mitigated Negative Declaration, , . Ll/-tÁÅJ Jk~ fl·ffÝ ð!r)7 l~útJr /' Name, Title , Date G, Consultation I. City ofChula Vista: Philip Hinshaw, Planning Division Marilyn Ponseggi, Planning Division Edalia Olivo-Gomez, Planning Division Doug Perry, Fire Marshall Samir Nuhaily, Engineering Department Beverly Blessent, Planning Division Ralph Leyva, Engineering Department M,], Donnelly, Engineering Department Applicant's Agent: Bob Belanger, Architect 2, Documents Acoustical Analysis (Site Compliance Survey), Investigative Science and Engineering, Inc" March 23,2001 (Revised) Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and ErR (1989) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code, September 1997 3, Initial Study This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period for this negative declaration, The report reflects the independent judgement of the City ofChula Vista, Further information regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, ~j)~fl' Date: 5/1/01 Maril R. F, Ponseggi ::I I Environmental Review Coordinator 4 ATTACHMENT "A" MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) South Bay Baptist Church Multi-Purpose Buildin~, IS-OO-53 This Mitigation Monitoring Program is prepared for the City of Chula Vista in conjunction with the proposed South Bay Baptist Church Multi-Purpose Building project (IS-00-53), The proposed project has been evaluated in an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City/State CEQA guidelines, The legislation requires public agencies to ensure that adequate mitigation measures are implemented and monitored on Mitigated Negative Declarations, such as IS-00-53, AB 3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or significant environmental impaets, The Mitigation Monitoring Program for this project ensures adequate implementation of mitigation for the following potential impacts(s): 1. Noise, 2, Hazards, MONITORING PROGRAM Due to the nature of the environmental issues identified, the Mitigation Compliance Coordinator shall be the Environmental Review Coordinator for the City of Chula Vista, It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the conditions of the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program are met to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator. Evidence in written fOmJ confimJing compliance with the mitigation measures specified in MND/IS-00-53 shall be provided by the applicant to the Environmental Review Coordinator. The Environmental Review Coordinator will thus provide the ultimate verification that the mitigation measures have been accomplished. Table I, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, lists the mitigation measures listed in Section F, Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Effects, of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, which will be implemented as part of the project. In order to detemJine if the applicant has implemented the measure, the method and timing of verification arc identified, along with the City department or agency responsible for moilitoring/veritying that the applicant has completed each mitigation measure, Space for the signature of the verifying person and the date of inspection is provided in the last column, (H:\home\planning\eda1ia\IS-OI-08 MMRP text.doc) <C ... .> .... . ...... r:: () E .... .. ..r:: · (,) i ;; ...... . cv · :: E ........... <C E i.' · u ..... .'. « ......... : '.' .. B .... '" ~ 0 ". · ë. . E ~ .. · i : u :.ê ..... ",. .. í.IJ' ". . ¡o..;..:^ ~... · :õ :: > 0< ';;j ~ c 1:: I · . ..... ¡¡."" · § § § 0 0:: : "~ "" " ~... ë. P. P. 0. 0. 0. -< -< -< c ~1 - - o. >< ........... 00 .,:I. ~ç ~;u .~ ø _ c i~ b¡.... c . Z 0.2 ·C'=' ~¡: = oooOI, ". =:C::I' =0 ~< c " Q.P QU .- I.: E ,- ~..~. ,- . .... o· ....~ '" Q;¡ ",. f;o;¡ I>.i.. >< . c >< ....í:ì ""ð - ~~. .......~. ~ 00 ;:¡:¡ '" .... ~. ¡..i "" c i· . c ..... 5 r:: ~.. ~ 0 _ c " - " 0. . Q .S! ." u ~ ~ ß -5 '3 . "C c ~§ 0.. ... -< = ;...: d) >. ¡;:.2 ¡:: .š · u .. § ~ Ë ~ = .¡:: . ::: .D 1\)...... Ë ::s H'. ...", - '" t;ï: u 00": :: 'E"O ~ § = ,ê CO - ;:¡:¡~ :...... .<;::"t; § 3 ~ ;a:B .2 .- .... <1.> 0 - 0 ~ -6 Z ..§ 5..š·~·~ ö .g::2 "¡:: .. E g.:S.!:: ~.!::.~ Ö () 0'" .g~13~§~[)o If) :;¡r " ~<BJj~8 æ£~ Vì p.. u <1) U UJ ~ U 0 I (,) ~ (1) (],) 0 bl)~ <I) '"d . (1) t1) Q.).s 0,) E ..c ~ B .S 15 "8 õ ~ ~ è ~ Õ "- ;Zi'" "'8 .¡..1'.£! 13 ... .13 b § :~ .D oS b ·....13 0 ~ E ro ¡::: o..c·.... () t:: ::s 0 I - " '" '- " "- § '" ~" " 0 " o.S b:=: 1-0 ~ <I) U ~ = 11. .....: ŠV,.co'Eo U ill - ~"" gS.....robl)O <1)0 0 ",'" . o ¡::: ;::::. VJ u · <Oi" . 8 '"0 <I) C1) N,...z t1) ~ 0- = ro 9-.S"'O] o ~ ..d.S 1-0 c; 0 13 ro U E I Þ'S< () 'Vj S 0 0.s (,) 0.0 o ~ ,.!:I <IJ S (1) ..... ~ p. gf::Eõ~uo.o 1-0''''' .¡j '" 0 ;.>. (1) ;::: C: ..... g..S .Q.&..c 8 0 .:; .S ..... c; ~ 1:: ro (I) ,D ,..c ~ ::s E4 uo.a~g."""oò"""~:Q "'"- " " g:;S ." > U 0"""" (1) 8 <n .S :¡: ];:g S .;:;"0 =' tí = ........ p.¡::¡"..c ro"""" OJ)...... .... o OJ) ~ ro (\) ~ \0 "2 '5 ..... = s:::: 0 ..... 0,)........ 0 ~ 19 ¡:: ~........ ~.S ~ ..r:: :a 13.S (,) ........ Q) 0\ t:: I-< ,.D <I) =' 0 0 ;>.. >< ~ 0 ~ .;!3 iG ~ ~ 8::Q 0 · ¡::;,.D f3 bI) Ë......·8 ~ ~ ,..D ~ ü u ~ ~ · OIJ~~sOlJ]~ - >f! ~ u < > ¡,¡:: ~ ~ 0....... ¡::¡.. iii .8 .g ::::: 't; .5 ø';,..D ~ ~ ¡::; ..... "'0 OIJ 0..;:::J ::s · ] ] ~ g.§ ~ ~ Œ 0 8 ~ (3 . 8 ~.J:: ..... ~ ~ ~ 1: ° 0 ~ ¡::r¡ .~ · .~ eo "d ~ ] ~ ~U) o"'Ci;:::J o.!:¡ 1È''''O "0 < ..r:: :>! ~ 0 6.. 0 ,..¡:: "d ;:::J ..... P Q (,) c .~8ãg:a8'-',.g~ã ° ;:::J ci! ~ bI) ~ "'d g.¡3 ~u''':g''''d~~ ;§ I. E !:¡ ..... ¡::: t:: .9- ~ ::::: ~ Œ OIJ ~.S ;:::J 8 bI).S .t:I O~~~I-<"O~CJ)Ê · ,..D .~ .~ ~ 8 ;:::J d ~ I-< OIJ ::E ~ ° P..S A ¡:;>'.¡3oo-E~ãoQ;:::J ~ ;:::J - 0"' o.J:: 0·.... O";:::J.....,..D - "0 ~ 8 .D S ç - - _>"§ 0 OIJ"'d~e °SOIJOV :ESE g;.:::,..D :¡: OIJ ~ 8 ~.~ ~ ~,~ u £ OIJ - 0 ::s ::::"'Ot;.gûe-E~~~u t; 0 g.....,..D "'d ~~-..:::. -ê 0 - ã òJ) ~ I-< ~ .¡3 '3 ~ .8 ~.¡3-B ~.J:: E ,..¡:::5CJ)Oo ~S5¡::¡"~ - d "'d ° 0"'- - 1-0 - U U ~ :: ~ .5 ,..D £ ~ ~ ~ <.,;.. -S ~ A.,p ~ A"'d 4-; ~ ~ .g 5 .S .Ë ].g ~ g ~ > 0 c'- 1-0 ~ Q'~ ~ d u t::: 0 0 g. A "'O.;!;1 Q CV ŠVO~~ O_°p.. E"'dUOIJ0..g- ~ O~_QOIJoo> CO . ,.cl-<_ (l)U~§_ êECJ)ò.O~b.OCJ)ob .~ 1: ~ OIJ "0 ......s .~ "'0 I-< 0.. ¡:::. 0 ~ íi~_bI)Oò.OOIJI-tS..:::!ã . ..r:: f;o;¡ :;::Og."'I)I)~;¡,¡::O> " g ,; 5"" "" ,5 fJ-'3 g .S ~ ~ ~ tE .g .E VJ .~ V1 .... ..... ~.~ þ~'~ B ~ g'~ §. u"d'E:Q~'~::9::9 ~ (l) OIJ "d::9 8...... v Q OIJ U l:I :J 0 § ;::::: .- ....... ~ .... ..... ...... Q ;::::: '''''..D ...... ..D "'d OIJ 0 z ;:::~û~~.go~~ê' u8~.Ê~~.Ê.Ê := t= 0 0 ;:::J ;:::J ;:::J OIJ ¿g ~ ~ Q...... en UU,..D(/}CC~o..,..DO~O M ;~ In -.:: Go) · · . 0 "" - N - 0 :;: : · :>! . en :>! « _ 1 C CD E ..c o .f! - « ¡¡ .~ õ. ~ >< t ;., , C 1:5....0 :s ~-~~.~ _ .,,, M ~ g-<u ¡:: g~"'" m ,"0.0 · ...,"' . - p.... . "'" .D ;:I ¡¡J.- 00 ~ rn ;:I <:r I!) > "0 P- O U)~..J::"y¡:;1!) ;:: _ _~.o t:. caè§~OJ}C'3 ~ bl) .8 '+:: 0·5 a.. .5 ~ .a ~ § 'õ · c;:j........ ._ ._ bl) 0 (I) tI) :: ~IU~--C""""O ::::I ..0 I-< ..... ¡::l.;;::: ::::E 0 - ,!::: ;; Q) ~ ar;<p".s~ .c ~ ..9: 0"'" 0 ...... 11) 0.0";..... 0 ~ :D ] .2 ~ 23 ..... ::J .¡¡;; <":I 0 V} ï3 ...... .c c: Q) "0 t=.S: I" o......=coM """ g. g ~ .:oj :I.. p.. ..... Q) <ZI ~ ..... U) I-< Q)~....c: c: ._ (JE~~u€" ..... ..c 0 ~ U ;::I M "" ~ ctI ~'+-ioo-<"'CC'3 OJ ..c::: V) .S '-' II.) p,. . ~ '~ê .", ~ "S ""ê~ 1:: .E!.~ C'30 cu C'30~b.:E0IJ1I) era ~ Q....... .~ O.S p.. p,. "'0 V)~ c::¡ OJ} "'0 C ; ~.~ .~ õ .S ~ .g ::::I ...... U ..!::! > ÇQ ..... o ,Jjg.¡¡"lJ õ (/) [-<iUOl)O,-"'CS I-< C'3 U 0 ã ~ M 10 · o N o · (/) Case No.IS-OO-53 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Name of Proponent: South Bay Baptist Church 2, Lead Agency Name and Address: City ofChula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 3. Address and Phone Nnmber of Proponent: 960 Fifth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 9191 (619) 422-0105 4. Name of Proposal: South Bay Baptist Church Multi-Purpose Building 5. Date of Checklist: April 23, 2001 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Signiflcant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or 0 0 0 181 zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 0 181 policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e,g" 0 0 0 181 impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of 0 0 0 181 an established community (including a low- income or minority community)? Comments: The 3,02~-acre site is fully developed as a church and associated facilities, The proposed project would amend the existing Conditional Use Permit (P 56-4) that was approved in 1956 by the County of San Diego. The proposed multi-use building is consistent with the R-I (Single-family Residential) zoning designation, LM (Low-Medium Residential 3-6 du/ac) General Plan designation, and the city's environmental plans and policies, The project is also consistent with the Montgomery Specific Plan, which designates the site as Low-Medium Residential (3-6) du/ac), The site is on the west side of Fifth Avenue between Arizona Street and Moss Street. Surrounding land uses to the north, east and west are single-family residential homes, Multi-family residential uses are located to the south, The southern property boundary is contiguous with the Telegraph Canyon drainage channel. I Potentially PotentiaHy Significant Less tbaD Significant Unless SignificaDt No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact The requested CUP amendment would: 1. Authorize the removal of an existing mobile office (492 sq,ft. trailer) structure, a storage shed (120 sq,ft,), and an existing 1,500 square-foot youth building (former single-family residence), 2, Authorize the construction of a 4,730 sq,ft, multi-purpose building with a maximum height of28 feet. Maximum seating capacity would be 286 inter-connecting portable chairs, The building is proposed to be constructed as a Type V, I -hour, wood frame and stucco building to match the existing buildings on-site, 3, Authorize the construction of new concrete walkways for access to the multi-purpose building, The proposed new multi-purpose building would be used for Sunday and Wednesday worship services, meetings, group gatherings, and youth activities, Worship services that are currently conducted in the existing church building would be moved to the new multi-purpose building, The requested amendments would not impact the physical arrangement of an established community Mitigation: No mitigation is required, II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local D D D C<I population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either D D D C<I directly or indirectly (e,g" through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable D D D C<I housing? Comments: The project is surrounded by existing residential development and does not involve an extension of public facilities that would induce substantial growth, No existing housing units would be displaced, Construction of the multi-use building is consistent with the General Plan and would not exceed the regional or local population projections, Mitigation: No mitigation is required, III. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in D D D C<I geologic substructures? b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or D D D C<I overcovering of the soil? c) Change in topography or ground surface relief D D D C<I features? 2 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact d) The destruction, covering or modification of 0 0 0 181 any unique geologic or physical features? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, 0 0 0 181 either on or off the site? 1) Changes in deposition or erosion ofbeach 0 0 0 181 sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay inlet or lake? g) Exposure of people or property to geologic 0 0 0 181 hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Comments: There are no known geophysical conditions present that would expose people to geologic or earth hazards, The site is not within a mapped Earthquake Fault Zone; the Rose Canyon Fault Zone is approximately 21 miles to the north, and the La Nacion earthquake fault is approximately three miles to the east. Compliance with the Uniform Building Code requirements would avoid potentially significant geologic impacts, No significant geophysical effects would result from construction of the building, Forty percent of the proposed building site (1,870-sq, ft.) is currently covered with existing structures, Increasing the impervious area by 2,900 sq,ft. to 4,730 sq,ft, would result in a negligible increase in runoff. The project site is essentially flat and no grading would be required to prepare the site for the proposed multi-purpose building, Standard engineering conditions require that a geotechnical/soils study be submitted with the first submittal of improvement plans, No significant effects such as runoff, erosion, sedimentation, change in topography, etc, would result from construction of the building, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 181 or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related 0 0 0 181 hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration 0 0 0 181 of surface water quality (e,g" temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 181 water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction 0 0 0 181 of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? 1) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or 0 0 0 181 through interception of an aquifer by cuts or 3 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significanl Unless Significant No IDlpact Mitigated IDlp8ct IDlpact excavations? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of 0 0 0 [¡J groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 [¡J i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood 0 0 0 [¡J waters? j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water 0 0 0 [¡J otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: Existing drainage patterns would not change as a result of constTucting the new facility, Forty percent of the proposed building site (1,870-sq, ft.) is currently covered with existing stTuctures, Increasing the impervious area by 2,900 sq,ft. to 4,730 sq,ft, would result in a negligible increase in runoff, No significant effects such as runoff, erosion, sedimentation, change in topography, etc, would result from constTuction ofthe building, No significant impacts to surface or ground water would result. Adequate public water service is available to the site, Groundwater would not be impacted because there would be no additions or withdrawals from the local aquifer. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 181 an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 181 c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, 181 or cause any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d) Create objectionable odors? 181 e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or 181 non-stationary sources of air emissions or the deterioration of ambient air quality? Comments: Negligible air quality effects would result because the increase in vehicular emissions (43 ADT Mondays through Saturdays and 172 ADT on Sundays) would be minimal. ConstTuction of the multi-purpose building would result in negligible short-tepn constTuction and grading emissions. Operation of the facility would not result in odor impacts, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 [¡J 0 b) Hazards to safety from design features (e,g" 0 0 0 [¡J sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e,g" farm equipment)? 4 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than SignifICant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact C) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 ~ nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? 0 0 0 ~ e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or 0 0 0 ~ bicyclists? t) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 ~ alternative transportation (e,g, bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 ~ h) A "large project" under the Congestion 0 0 0 ~ Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips,) Comments: The City Engineering Department has calculated the increase in daily traffic to be 43 trips per day Monday through Saturday and 172 trips on Sunday. Fifth Avenue and Moss Street are classified as Class II Co1\ector streets, L Street is classified as a Class I Co1\ector. The additional traffic would not result in a decrease in the Level of Service, The City Engineer recommends that the project be conditioned to widen Fifth Avenue to 26 feet, and that a new curb and gutter be provided to accommodate on-street parking that matches the rest of the 900 block of Fifth A venue, The widening is not required as a mitigation measure, The widening will require a modification of the drainage channel along the southern property boundary, A streetlight (250 watts) sha1\ be insta1\ed at the southern property line, The parking requirement is 82 spaces, The existing main parking lot is striped for 82 parking spaces (including four handicapped spaces), Five additional parking spaces (two handicapped) are located on the north side ofthe youth/classroom building, A 25-foot wide paved driveway (two-lane) provides access to the main parking lot. A 14- foot wide paved driveway along the northern property line provides a secondary access to the main parking lot. No additional parking would be required because the new building would not increase the level of activity at the church facility, No changes to ingress and egress are proposed, and no hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists would be created, No traffic related impacts are anticipated to rešult. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of 0 0 0 ~ concern or species that are candidates for listing? b) Loca1\y designated species (e,g" heritage 0 0 0 ~ trees)? 0 0 0 ~ 5 PotentiaUy PotentiaUy SignifiCant Less than Significant Uniess Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact C) Locally designated natural communities (e,g" oak forest, coastal habitat, etc,)? d) Wetland habitat (e,g" marsh, riparian and 0 0 0 181 vernal pool)? e) Wild1ife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 181 f) Affect regional habitat preservation planning 0 0 0 181 efforts? Comments: The site is fully developed and is located in an urbanized area, There are no sensitive plant or animal species on-site, No biological impacts would result from the proposed use of the site, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation D D D 181 plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and D D D 181 inefficient manner? c) ¡fthe site is designated for mineral resource D D D 181 protection, will this project impact this protection? Comments: The proposed multi-purpose building does not conflict with the recently adopted CO2 Reduction Plan. The project proponent wil1 provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the Sib Avenue frontage that wil1 aid pedestrian circulation in the project area, The proposed project is subject to comp1iance with Energy Requirements ofthe Uniform Building Code and therefore, should not result in the use of non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. The project is not located in an area designated for mineral resource protection as defined in the City's General Plan, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of D D D 181 hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency D D D 181 response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential D D D 181 health hazard? 6 PotentiaUy Potentially Significant Lesstban Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 I!J 0 0 potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0 I!J brush, grass, or trees? Comments: The proposed use ofthe site would not involve operations involving hazardous substances, nor would it interfere with emergency response or evacuation plans, No known health or fire hazard impacts would result from the use of the site, Demolition of the storage shed and fonner single-family residence could result in the release of airborne asbestos fibers if the structures contain asbestos materials, Release of airborne asbestos fibers could result in a significant health hazard, Mitigation: Mitigation measures listed in Section XIX would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 '" 0 0 b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 I!J 0 Comments: In the residential R-I zone, the Zoning Ordinance (§19,68,030) establishes the maximum pennissible daytime hourly noise levels as 55 dB(A) between the hours of? a,m, to 10 p,m, on weekdays (8:00 a,m, to 10:00 p,m, on Sundays) and 45 dB(A) between the hours of 10:00 p,m, and 7:00 a,m, on weekdays (10:00 p,m, to 8:00 a,m,) on Sundays, The ordinance provides that if the measured ambient level exceeds the pennissible noise level, the allowable noise exposure standard shall be the ambient noise level. Noise levels by receiving land uses are measured at the boundary or at any point within the boundary of the property affected. An Acoustical Analysis was perfonned by Investigative Science and Engineering, Inc, (March 23, 200 I Revised) to measure the potential noise impacts from the proposed facility to the adjacent neighbors to the north, A noise measurement of 51,8 Leq was taken near the north property line of the site October 26, 2000 (Thursday) at 12:30 p,m, Noise measurements taken on February 25, 2001 (Sunday) were 54.0 Leq (8:30 a,m,), 60,5 Leq (9:30 a,m,), 55,0 Leq (10:30 a,m,), and 57,0 Leq (II :30 a,m,), The Sunday measurements were taken to establish the noise levels associated with the current church activities, Interior noise measurements of the pipe organ in the existing church facility showed that average noise levels within the center of the building were 69.3 dB(A) Leq-15mm' Maximum levels were 72 dB(A) and minimum levels were 53 dB (A) , Measurements taken at similar facilities by the consulting acoustician indicate that typical church singing can range upwards of 80 dB(A) Leq-15mio' This 80-dB(A) level was used as the basis of the noise analysis of the proposed multi-purpose building" A noise insulation analysis was perfonned to detennine the sound transmission effects of the proposed multi-purpose building, The interior noise level produced by the proposed church activities were ca1culated in tenns of decibels, A-weighted, and converted to six-octave band sound pressure levels. The expected noise levels outside the building are a function of the sound transmission Joss qualities of the construction material and the surface area of the walls, windows, doors, etc, The north wall of the 7 Potentially Potentially Significant Less thaD Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact building would face the adjacent single-family residences located 30 to 35 feet north of the proposed building, There is an existing 7- foot masonry and wood fence along the northern property line. The building floor plan shows one double door in the north wall and no windows, The interior noise level of SO dB(A) requires the building structure to have a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of30 in order to achieve the 55-dB(A) exteriornoise level required by the Zoning Ordinance, The structural noise analysis was based on the architectural plans and the composite building shell, The analysis concluded that the building would have an STC rating of 4S, Thus, the noise reduction that would be achieved by the proposed architecture of the building exceeds the requirement of STC 30 to reduce the exterior noise to a 55-dB(A) level. Consequently, no significant impact would result from activities conducted within the proposed building, However, a significant noise impact could occur if: (I) concurrent worship services are conducted in the existing church building and the proposed multi-purpose building; or (2) the proposed multi-purpose building is used in conjunction with weekday educational programs conducted in the existing church building and the youth/classroom building located behind the existing church building, The single largest noise generator in the vicinity of the project site is traffic along 5'" Avenue, The Acoustical Analysis also evaluated the potential noise impacts to the proposed facility rrom traffic along 5'" Avenue, Existing traffic noise levels at the front (east) of the site were measured to average 52 dB(A) on October 26, 2000, Noise levels associated with the arrival and departure of worshippers for the Sunday morning service results in an approximate 4 to 5 dB(A) increase in overall ambient noise levels These events occur at approximately 9:30 a,m, and 11:30 a,m, and are of a short-term duration (i,e, several minutes), The overall character (L90 or 90% of the time) of the ambient noise levels during the Sunday morning worship period increased by approximately two decibels, This is not considered to be a significant environmental impact. Fifth A venue currently has a traffic volume of 6,SSO ADT, The increase in traffic resulting rrom the proposed multi-purpose building would be 43 trips per day Monday through Saturday and 172 trips on Sunday, This level of traffic increase would increase the noise levels in the area by less than 3 dB(A), the level of noise increase that is barely perceptible by the human ear. The increase in traffic noise as a resuH of the project would be less than significant. The architectural plans submitted to the City do not include heating or air conditioning equipment. If heating and air conditioning equipment is installed, the equipment could conceivably exceed City noise standards, Although the noise analysis report notes that "HV AC units would be of a low-noise type and would have sufficient structural attenuation (i,e" cinder-block enclosure) to preclude impacts to surrounding residential uses," the submitted plans do not provide a basis for this conclusion, Thus, the installation of HV AC equipment could resuH in a significant environmental impact. Mitigation: Mitigation measures listed in Section XIX would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas," a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 t;J b) Police protection? 0 0 0 t;J c) Schools? 0 0 0 t;J 8 PotentiaUy PotentiaUy Significant Less than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact d) Maintenance of public facilities, including 0 0 0 181 roads? e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 181 Comments: No new or altered public faci1ities would be required to serve the proposed multi-purpose building, No significant impacts would result. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, XII. Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact the City's Threshold Standards? 0 0 0 181 As described below, the proposed project does not result in significant impacts to any of the Threshold Standards, a) FirelEMS 0 0 0 181 The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases, The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the nearest fire station is two miles away and would be associated with a four- minute response time, The proposed project woul(comply with this Threshold Standard, Comments: No new fire or EMS service would be required to serve the proposed facilities, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, b) Police 0 0 0 181 The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority I calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of 4,5 minutes or less, Police units must respond to 62,10% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project would comply with this Threshold Standard, Comments: No new police service wou1d be required for the proRosed facilities. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, c) Traffic 0 0 0 181 1. City-wide: Maintain LOS "c" or better as measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial segments except that during peak hours a LOS of"D" can occur for no more than any two hours of the day, 2, West of 1-805: Those signalized intersections which do not meet the standard above may continue to operate at their current 1991 LOS, but shall not worsen, The proposed project complies with this Threshold Standard, 9 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than Significant Unl~ Signmcant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact Comments: The proposed project would generate an additional 43 ADT Monday through Saturday and 172 ADT on Sunday, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, d) Parks/Recreation 0 0 0 I<J The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3-acres/I,OOO population east ofI- 805, The proposed project would comply with this Threshold Standard, Comments: No new park or recreation facilities would be required to serve the proposed facilities, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required. e) Drainage 0 0 0 I<J The Threshold Standards require that stonn water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards, Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards, The proposed project would comply with this Threshold Standard, Comments: No new drainage facilities would be required to serve the facilities, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, t) Sewer 0 0 0 I<J The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards, Individual projects wiJl provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards, The proposed project would_comply with this Threshold Standard, Comments: No new sewer service would be required to serve the requested facilities, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, g) Water 0 0 0 I<J The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and those water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project would comply with this Threshold Standard, Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off- set program the City ofChula Vista has in effect at the time of building pennit issuance, Comments: No new water service would be required to serve the facilities, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, XIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 I<J 10 Potentially Potentially Significanl Less than Significant Unl~ Significanl No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 r2I c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 r2I facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 r2I e) Stonn water drainage? 0 0 0 r2I f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 r2I Comments: No new utilities would be required to serve the proposed facility, The Telegraph Canyon stonn drain channel is contiguous with the project site's southern property boundary, On-site drainage facilities will be installed in accordance with City engineering standards. An eight-inch sewer line is located in Fifth Avenue, The City Engineering Department reports that the sewer line has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed facility, No significant impacts would occur Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the 0 0 0 r2I public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? b) Cause the destruction or modification of a 0 0 0 r2I scenic 'route? c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 r2I d) Create added light or glare sources that could 0 0 0 r2I increase the level of sky glow in an area or cause this project to fail to comply with Section 19,66,100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 19? e) Produce an additional amount of spill light? 0 0 0 r2I Comments: The proposed facility is located within an urbanized area and there are no scenic vista or viewpoints on, or adjacent to, the property, The proposed construction would not result in significant aesthetic impacts or create additional light spill, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposar a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or 0 0 0 r2I the destruction or a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or 0 0 0 r2I aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a 0 0 0 r2I 11 Potentially PotentiaUy Significant Less than Significant UoI", Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or 0 0 0 181 sacred uses within the potential impact area? e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan 0 0 0 181 ErR as an area of high potential for archeological resources? Comments: The Conservation and Open Space Element ofthe General Plan does not identify the project site or surrounding vicinity as an area of potential cultural resources, There are no known cultural resources in the project area and no significant impacts would result. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, 0 0 0 181 XVI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of paleontological resources? Comments: The Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan does not identify the project site or surrounding vicinity as an area of potential paleontological resources, There are no known paleontological resources on the site or in the adjacent area, No cut grading is required and no significant impacts to paleontological resources are anticipated, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, XVII. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 181 regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 181 c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation 0 0 0 181 plans or programs? Comments: The proposed facilities would not require any off-site recreational facilities, No significant impacts would occur. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declarationfor mandatory findings of significance, If an EIR is needed, this section should be completed a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 181 the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to 12 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than SignifICant Unl~ Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods or California history or prehistory? Comments: The site is fully developed with a church and is located in an urbanized area, No sensitive plant or animal resource impacts would occur. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 181 short-term, to the disadvantage oflong-term, environmental goals? Comments: Constructing a church facility on the site would not affect long-term environmental goals of the City ofChula Vista in that the project site is not identified for preservation in the City's recently adopted Draft Multiple Species Conservation Program Subarea Plan and the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 181 individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects,) Comments: The proposed facilities would not result in cumulative effects because the site, and surrounding area, is fully developed, No other projects have been recently approved in the area, nor are there any known future projects in the area, No significant impacts would occur. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, d) Does the project have environmental effects 0 0 0 181 which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: No significant effects on human beings are anticipated to result from approving the proposed multi-purpose building, Mitigation: No mitigation measures are required, 13 XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES: The foHowing project revisions or mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project and will be implemented during the design, construction and operation of the project: NOISE Heating and Air Condition Equipment 1. If building plans submitted to the City include exterior heating and air conditioning equipment, a City approved acoustician shaH be retained by the applicant to perfonn an acoustical analysis of any proposed heating and air conditioning equipment to detennine if the equipment meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements pertaining to noise (see §19,68,030). The acoustical analysis wiH be submitted to the City's Environmental Coordinator for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building pennit. 2, Concurrent worship services shaH not be conducted in the multi-purpose building and the existing church building. The multi-purpose building shaH not be used in conjunction with weekday educational programs conducted in the existing church building and the youth/classroom building located behind the existing church building, HAZARDS Asbestos 1. The applicant shaH contract with an environmental consultant certified by the State of California to conduct testing for the presence of asbestos in buildings to be demolished, A report shaH be submitted to the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department that identifies whether or not asbestos is present. If required, a remedial work plan for the removal and disposal of asbestos shaH be submitted for review and approval by the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department and San Diego County Air PoHution Control District. 2, The applicant shaH be responsible for obtaining aH required pennits from state and local regulatory agencies, including the San Diego Air PoHution Control District (APCD), and shaH provide proof of having obtained such pennits to the Planning and Building Department prior to issuance of a demolition pennit 14 XX. AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT MITIGATION MEASURES By signing the line(s) provided below, the Applicant(s) and/or Operator( s) stipulate that they have each read, understood and have their respective company's authority to and do agree to the mitigation measures contained herein, and will implement same to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator. Failure to sign the line(s) provided below prior to posting of this Mitigated Negative Declaration with the County Clerk shall indicate the Applicants' and/or Operator's desire that the Project be held in abeyance without approval and that Applicant(s) and/or Operator(s) shall apply for an Environmental Impact Report, :5ou-/f;t ÞÚf.. 73a(J-h <sf QÌ1uVl-h,M¡i::kl/lP( j}¡fl0ul It--- O,Ç/OIJ /'?'f/l)/ Printed Name and Title of Authorized Representitive Date (propertyOwn-:'sName) ~ ~~)~ Signatu e of Authorized epresentative (Property Owner's Name) Printed Name and Title of Operator if different Date from Property Owner Signature of Authorized Operator if different from Property Owner 15 XXI. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages, D Land Use and Planning D Transportation/Circulation D Public Services D Population and Housing D Biological Resources D Utilities and Service Systems D Geophysical D Energy and Mineral Resources D Aesthetics D Water . Hazards D Cultural Resources D Air Quality . Noise D Recreation D Paleontology D Mandatory Findings of Significance XXII. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, D and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, . there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an D ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at D least one effect: 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impacts" or "potentially significant unless mitigated," An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed, I find that although the proposed project could have a significant êffect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects D (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. An addendum has been prepared to provide a record of this detennination, ~JY~~' SI'7/o/ Mlyn ,F, Ponseggi Daie I Environmental Review Coordinator City ofChula Vista 16