Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1982/03/04 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Thursday, March 4,1982 Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. Public Services Building ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT Chairman Cox; Members Gillow, Campbell, McCandliss, Scott MEMBERS ABSENT None STAFF PRESENT Executive Director Cole, Agency Attorney Lindberg, Redevelopment Coordinator legler, Development Specialist Kassman ALSO PRESENT David Nuffer, John DeBello, Lyle Jenkins ITEM NO.1 - APPROVAL OF MINUTES MSUC (Campbell/Gillow) to approve the minutes of February 4, 18, and 22, 1982 as mailed. ITEM NO.2 - REPORT: STATUS OF WHITEMAN/GURNEE NEGOTIATIONS At the February 18 Agency meeting, staff was directed to negotiate with the principals in this proposal towards the recolll11endation of an owner participation agreement. Because Mrs. Whiteman is out of the country at this time, an agreement cannot be acted upon. MOTION TO ACCEPT THE REPORT MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to accept the report. ITEM NO.3 - RESOLUTION NO. 355 - AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BAY FRONT SIGNS TO GRAPHIC SOLUTIONS LTD. In January of this year, a request for bi ds was sent to six local sign producers for the construction of Bayfront signs. Funds have been appropriated in the 1981-82 Redevelopment Agency budget. Redevelopment Coordinator Zegl er narrated a bri ef sl i de presentation of the proposed signing offered by Graphic Solutions, Ltd. The slide show depicted architectural renderings including materials to be used as well as height limitations established by the Agency for signs to be located at the Bayfront. Redevelopment Agency Meeting -2- March 4, 1982 RESOLUTION OFFERED by Member McCandl i ss, the reading of the text was wai ved by unanimous consent, passed and adopted unanimously. ITEM NO.4 - REPORT: BAY FRONT STATUS A report was provi ded for Agency members' consi derati on with regard to the invol vement by the State Coastal Conservancy relative to discussions about the Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Plan, an organizational meeting to be set up for discussion on the financing of the proposed "J II Street marina, temporary housing facil iti es for Navy personnel in the tidelands area, and invol vement by the Santa Fe Land Improvement Company regarding their joint venture partnership proposal for planning and development of 17 acres in the vicinity of "J" Street and Bay Boulevard. In response to Member McCandliss' question regarding involvement by the State Coastal Conservancy, Chairman Cox noted that the most recent contact with the Conservancy came as a result of the first non-negotiating session with the State Coastal Commission. Mr. Zegler explained the Coastal Conservancy's affiliation with other State departments. MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT MSUC (Gillow/Campbell) to accept the report. ITEM NO.5 - REPORT: FOCUS AREA STATUS Agency members were provi ded wi th a status report on the Town Centre parking structure, United Artists Theatre parcel, and leasing of colll11ercial space in the proposed retail center. With regard to the parking structure, the consultant contract for servi ces will not be brought to the Agency until financial commitments have been secured by the developer, Mr. Zogob. In answer to Member McCandliss' question, the Redevelopment Coordinator stated that plans and el evati ons of the restaurant and theatre bun di ngs are to be submitted to the Agency in the near future. Discussion followed with regard to competitive rental rates being offered in the Town Centre Focus Area. Mr. Zegler noted that the rates are certainly not competiti ve wi th rents along Third Avenue; however, according to the John Burnham Company these rates are wi thin an acceptable market range, particularly for newer colll11ercial sites to the east, i.e. Bonita. Redevelopment Coordinator legler, in response to Chai rman Cox's question, stated that all indications are that Crystal T'S is committed to the property along the Bayfront. He al so noted that a Day Break Restaurant i s schedul ed for opening on March 15. The grand opening for the completed Days Inn motel is scheduled for June 1, 1982. 3/4/82 Redevelopment Agency Meeting -3- March 4, 1982 ITEM NO.6 - REPORT: STATUS OF RELOCATION OF SOUTH BAY AUTO PARTS The owner of this operation, Mr. Lyle Jenkins, has informed staff that he is close to an agreement with the adjacent property owner for a drainage easement for his new site at Third Avenue and "L" Street. The agreement i s necessary before construction of his new facility can begin. The Stipulati on for Judgment concerning the termination date of occupancy at this site and actual rel ocati on of the business has been prepared by the Agency Speci al Counsel. The document's 1 anguage is being reviewed at this time by Mr. Jenkins' attorney. Agency Attorney Lindberg explained that due to Special Counsel Reed's absence from this meeting due to illness, he could not explain the conditions of the Stipulation for Judgment tonight. He suggested that this item be deferred to the Agency's mid-month meeting on March 18. MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT AND CONTINUE ITEM. MSUC (Scott/Cox) to accept the report and continue the item to the March 18 Redevelopment Agency meeting. LYLE JENKINS SOUTH BAY AUTO PARTS 602 Melrose Avenue Chula Vista, California Mr. Jenkins reiterated that the problem that currently exists is for an agreement with the adjacent property owner for a drainage easement. He noted that the Engineering Department has come up with an al ternate plan. Mr. Jenkins also commented that he probably would not be able to vacate the premi ses before the end of June. Agency Attorney Lindberg explained to the owner that he did not feel it was appropriate at this time to discuss an extension for the operation to remain on the premises until further discussion with the Special Counsel, Mr. Reed. ITEM NO.7 - REPORT: TOWN CENTRE SIGN REBATE PROGRAM An addendum to the Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program is being proposed whi ch woul d provi de for rebates of up to $500 to Town Centre businesses towards the cost of replacing signs which do not conform to City design standards. Priority will be given to Third Avenue locations, but only those entities located within the Town Centre redevelopment area will be eligible. Member Scott expressed concern with the fairness of this proposal. For instance, is it fair to restrict this type of rebate program to just Town Centre redevelopment area businesses? How many businesses are we going to do? And, what is the timing - when are we going to cut it off? 3/4/82 Redevelopment Agency Meeting -4- March 4, 1982 Further discussion ensued regarding the City/Agency's potential liability. Redevelopment Coordinator Zegler commented that originally this proposal was to be a one-time-only aid for redevelopment to assist in removing old signage in the area. The proposal was currently being reveiewed by the Town Centre Development Corporation, and after input was received from other businessmen, we should have an understanding of the dynamics of the program. Member McCandliss indicated that she could endorse the concept; however, she would rather endorse it as a concept to be implemented. MOTION TO ENDORSE CONCEPT OF THE SIGN REBATE PROGRAM MSUC (McCandliss/Campbell) to endorse the concept of a si gn rebate program and request the Town Centre Development Corporation to return to the Agency with an implementation program or similar program. ITEM NO.8 - REPORT: STATUS OF TOWN CENTRE II Members of staff, along with Mayor Cox, met on February 18 with Messrs. Lipp and Healy of Carter Harley Hale Properties, Incorporated. The meeting was to discuss the development status of the Chula Vista Shopping Center. MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT MSUC (Cox/Gillow) to accept the report. Mr. Zegler reported that Mr. Borst, Walker Scott, has reaffirmed his interest in participating in the development. Upon conferring with Mr. Borst this afternoon, he indicated that Walker Scott is developing a store in El Centro and the Corona Del Mar area. ITEM NO.9 - REPORT: PUBLIC RELATIONS PROGRAM - AUDIO/VISUAL PRESENTATION Staff was directed to investigate the cost of developing a professional audio/ visual presentation to promote the City. A promotional film recently completed for the City of National City has been produced by Four Square Productions and the film has been made available for Agency member's review tonight. At this time, the 18-minute film was viewed. JOHN DEBELLO FOUR SQUARE PRODUCTIONS 1775 Diamond Street San Diego, California Mr. DeBello explained that the film was recently completed for the City of Nati ona 1 City for two purposes: 1. to leave a legacy for the City; 3/4/82 Redevelopment Agency Meeting -5- March 4, 1982 ? to promote civic pride; 3. for business attraction and promotion. Mr. DeBello explained that the approximately $20,000 film will be sent to prospective businesses. The fil m was a concerted effort of the City of National City as well as their Chamber of Colll11erce. In response to members I questions, Mr. DeBello explained that 50% of the funding for the film came from the City and the other funds were contributed by the Chamber and private sources. He further expl ained that the film has segments that coul d be edited in order to update as well as 1 engthen the producti on. He continued to explain the easy transportation of the film - the 811111 projector can fold into a briefcase-size carrying case. Member McCandliss said that her initial conception of the purpose of the public relations film was to obtain Bayfront plan approval. It seems now that we are reaching out into other areas, and tonight's presentation could not effectively sell the Bayfront plan to the Coastal Commission in a technical sense. Member Scott colll11ented on the goals of redevelopment utilizing this type of presentati on. He questioned the justification of a film of this nature for promoti ng those goals. Member Campbell suggested that the Agency give serious consideration to approving this type of film presentation. In terms of financing, he suggested that the Chamber of Colll11erce be contacted for sharing expenses. Chairman Cox echoed Member Campbell's comments. He noted that thi s subject should be considered in the next budget session. MOTION TO BRING ITEM BACK AT BUDGET TIME MSUC (Scott/Campbell) to bring this i tem back at budget time, outlining goal s, and to refer item to the Chamber of Colll11erce to solicit their participation in funding through colll11ittee or private sources. Member Gillow noted that initially staff was directed to study the implementation of a Bayfront slide presentation. The Agency also directed staff to look into a total presentation beyond the scope of just selling the Coastal Commission on the Bayfront. ITEM NO. 10 - REPORT: FINANCIAL REPORT A financi al status report prepared by the Finance Department for quarter ending December 31, 1981 was prepared for the Agency. This report covers activity of all bond issues existing at that time, as well as funds held by the Agency. 3/4/82 Redevelopment Agency Meeting -6- March 4, 1982 MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to accept the report. MEMBERS' COMMENTS Chairman Cox commented on the dedication ceremony for the South County Regional Center this afternoon. He was very pleased wi th the 1 arge turn out by Chula Vista citizens. Chairman Cox remarked that the light fixtures at the Regional Center are not energized yet. Mr. Cole indicated that staff would look into this. MOTION TO ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to adjourn to closed session for possible litigation. The Agency adjourned to Closed Session at 8:11 p.m. The Recording Secretary was excused and staff reported that the Closed Session ended at 8:38 p.m. ADJOURNMENT AT 8:38 p.m. to the mid-month meeting of Thursday, March 18, 1982 at 4:00 p.m. Secretary 3/4/82