HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1981/12/08
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Tuesday, December 8, 1981 - 9:13 p.m. Council Chambers - Public Services Bldg.
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT Chairman Cox; Members McCandliss, Scott, Gillow,
Campbell
Members Absent None
STAFF PRESENT Executive Director Cole, Agency Counsel Lindberg,
Community Development Director Desrochers
ALSO PRESENT Willene Whiteman, Ted Gurnee, James Cappos
CLOSED SESSION
MSUC (McCandliss/Scott) for a Closed Session to discuss litigation.
The Redevelopment Agency recessed to Closed Session at 9:13 p.m. and reconvened
at 9:30 p.m.
RECESS
Chairman Cox announced a two-minute recess ,to provide Agency members an opportunity
to r~View the agenda material.
ITEM NO.1 - RESOLUTION NO. 344 - AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT DEED
TRANSFERRING TITLE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO CENTRE CITY ASSOCIATES
LIMITED - COMMERCIAL AND TO MARIE CALLENDER
VENTURES, INC.
The resolution authorizes transfer of Parcel 3 of Town Centre Project I property,
consisting of approximately 18,720 square feet, pursuant to supplemental agreement
to the Disposition and Development Agreement between the Agency and Centre City
Associates, Limited executed in September 1978.
RESOLUTION OFFERED by Member Scott, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous
consent, passed and adopted unanimously.
ITEM NO.2 - REPORT: CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGES IN THE BAY FRONT
PROJECT AND SETTING TIME AND PLACE FOR SAID PUBLIC HEARING
Community Development Director Desrochers stated that he discussed this issue with
both Mrs. Whiteman and Mr. Cappos by telephone and noted that Mr. Cappos would
most likely not be satisfied with the recommendation. He displayed a map suggesting
that if the Agency considers the proposed land use change and sets a public hearing,
that the Motor Marina Motel, the Whiteman and Cappos parcels and a portion of pro-
perty owned by Santa Fe be included. He recommended a9ainst that course of action
inasmuch as supplemental environmental impact statements will be required prior to
holding the public hearing and it would also involve a Redevelopment Plan amendment
and General Plan amendment. He further recommended postponement until a settlement
is received from the Courts on the LCP or negotiation with the Coastal Commission
is completed.
12/8/81
Adjourned Regular Meeting -
Redevelopment Agency -2- December 8, 1981
Mr. Desrochers explained the reasons for a six-month delay, commenting that a change
from an open space designation to utilization of the property requires an environ-
mental impact statement (supplemental) and it takes at least three months to conduct
such a review.
Responding to Member Campbell, the director explained that Mr. Cappos has proposed
to construct a reverse osmosis plant of approximately 10,000 square feet at the foot
of "F" Street and the Whiteman proposal is for a ten-year interim use, not involving
construction of any new buildings and therefore not requiring a change in land use
for the Redevelopment Plan.
Further comment and discussion ensued concerning the land use and designation of the
Cappos property. It was noted that since a new building is involved in the Cappos
proposal, that it complicates the procedure changing the use which exists presently.
Referring to the Whiteman property, Mr. Desrochers stated that the property can be
used for boatbuilding without major modification in the structure and therefore the
attorney can advise the Agency to accept an owner participation agreement for an
interim specific period of time.
Chairman Cox highlighted the staff report and recommendation to approve a ten-year
owner participation agreement (with no renewal or option clauses) for use of the
Whiteman property for a shipbuilding facility as proposed by Mr. Gurnee, to do
nothing with the Cappos property at this time; to consider land use designation at
a future date after the question of the whole LCP is resolved.
MRS. WILLENE WHITEMAN
766 Ocean Surf Drive
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Mrs. Whiteman, owner of the Shangri-La property, stated that she signed the lease,
anticipating a considerable amount of money for use of her property since the pro-
perty was water-oriented. She said that she requested a ten-year owner participa-
tion agreement in August; that the Agency is giving her the "run-around" and
"sta 11 i ng" and that her property has been vacant because no one wi 11 i nvest and that
she would support a ten-year owner participation agreement but that the agreement
presented to her tonight is wholly unacceptable.
MR. TED GURNEE
PACIFIC COAST WELDING & MACHINE, INC.
P.O. Box 1355
National City, CA 92050
Mr. Gurnee, representing San Diego Shipbuilding & Repair, referred to their agree-
ment that they would go along with an interim, ten-year LIse of the property, but
stated that there are two issues: (1) what will permanently happen to the 12 acres;
and, (2) a decision on the interim use. He spoke in strong support of the recommen-
dation for a public hearing to have permanent use of certain acreage for industrial
use, stressing the need for a permanent decision.
Further Agency discussion concerned the interim use; the ten-year option; the LCP
which the City cannot get through the Coastal Commission; whether the City/Agency
should be preparing to buy the property; the process of making a change in zoning.
12/8/81
--- ----------
Adjourned Regular Meeting -
Redevelopment Agency -3- December 8, 1981
MOTION TO ACCEPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION
MSC (Gillow/McCandliss) to accept the staff recommendation. (Member Campbell ab-
stained from voting on this matter.)
MR. JAMES CAPPOS
RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING OF SOUTH BAY
965 "F" Street
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Mr. Cappos, owner of Rayne Water Conditioning of South Bay, expressed perplexity
that "many things decided last Thursday" (regular Redevelopment Agency meeting) have
gone the other way tonight; he stated that time is of the essence and the project will
be lost if not approved soon; that the architects of the Bayfront Plan have caused
the City to lose many other projects; he stressed the need for industry in the City
and that his property is of greater necessity to the City than it is to him because
of the water that will be produced. He explained that the building will be used to
house long-term testing equipment for reverse osmosis units that will be manufactured
at Scripps Ranch by Fluid Systems.
Community Development Director Desrochers clarified the staff recommendation that
the Agency consider at the next meeting the owner participation agreement and that
Mrs. Whiteman and the Agency have an opportunity to review the agreement before the
next meeting so that consideration of the owner participation agreement would be the
subject of the next meeting.
Chairman Cox commented on the need to expedite negotations with the Coastal Commission;
suggested scheduling a meeting in early January with Santa Fe Land Improvement Com-
pany as a background session for the Agency so that negotiations can begin with the
Coastal Commission possibly in late January; to schedule a tour of the Bayfront area
for the State Coastal Commissioners in conjunction with their meeting scheduled for
January 19-22, in San Diego.
MOTION TO CONTACT SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY AND COASTAL COMMISSION
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to (1) contact Santa Fe Land Improvement Company and their proposed
developer and schedule a meeting early in January to find out where they are with
their proposed use of the Bayfront area lands that they have control of; (2) direct
staff to contact the State Coastal Commission to see if they would be agreeable to
schedule a bus tour which we will conduct and take them on a tour of the coastal
area; and (3) authorize the Mayor to contact the Chairman of the State Coastal
Commission to begin establishing a negotiation schedule.
Additional comment related to the RFP process; the need to restudy the area and the
time required.
MOTION TO REFER TO STAFF
MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to refer to staff the process of going (again) out to consultants
to study the Bayfront and have staff come back with a report on how long it will take,
and what they would recommend and track that at the same time as the other items
along with a review of the scope of the work.
ADJOURNMENT at 10:15 p.m. to
cretary
---- ---------------