HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1980/03/06 8 PM
MINUTES OF A WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Thursday - 8:23 p.m. March 6, 198D
A workshop meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista was held
on the above date, beginning at 8:23 p.m. following the regularly scheduled Rede-
velopment Agency meeting in the Council Chambers of the Public Services Building,
276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, with the following:
MEMBERS PRESENT Chairman Hyde; Members McCandliss, Scott, Gi1low, Cox
Members Absent None
ST AFF PRESENT Executive Director Cole, Community Development Director
Desrochers, Special Counsel Reed, Development Services
Administrator Robens, Community Development Coordinator
Sanseverino, Senior Planner Pass, Agency Attorney
Lindberg
ALSO PRESENT Richard Zogob, Ed Laguardia
STATUS OF ALPHA BETA
At the January 24 focus area workshop session, Agency members requested further
meetings of this nature be held with the developer. Due to the illness of
Mr. Zogob's architect, however, the February 28 workshop was postponed until this
date following the regular Agency meeting.
Community Development Director Desrochers reported that Community Development has
received sketches from Alpha Beta as well as from the developer's architect,
Don Innis. The Town Planner, Dan Pass, has briefly reviewed these sketches that
were available for members' review. Staff will now be able to evaluate the
sketches but would like Agency input prior to doing so.
Special Counsel Reed commented that Alpha Beta is conducting a marketing study to
determine if they want to locate in the focus area. That study is expected in
two weeks.
Senior Planner Pass addressed the proposed plan submitted by Alpha Beta. He de-
scribed the 51,000 square foot proposal as a fairly large junior department store
that had little to do with the focus area mercantile, and because of the plan's
scattered pattern, he could not see how it would fit in with the Design Manual or
Redevelopment Plan concept.
Mr. Desrochers stated the Senior Planner has been asked to check on the merits of
a 35,000 square foot store.
Mr. Pass briefly commented on Mr. Innis' proposal that would include Alpha Beta.
He stated the architect has attempted to ameliorate the difficulties of placement
of a large structure. A bold attempt to save the plan has been made by Mr. Innis
but it appears the present parking structure cannot be retained if Alpha Beta is
to build any store in the area.
3/6/80
------ --------------
-2-
Redevelopment Agency
Workshop Meeting March 6, 1980
Discussion ensued regarding UDAG. Member Scott questioned the rationale of senior
citizen housing.
Mr. Desrochers cited three reasons:
1) priority to obtain a site for senior citizens;
2) assist in obtaining funds to provide for the acquisition of a portion
of that area;
3) could also assist with the obtaining of a UDAG.
In addition, the sketches may provide a "fall back" position in case UDAG is not
obtai ned. He emphasize~though, that staff and the developer still need to
evaluate all proposed plans.
Member Gillow questioned how staff could evaluate four schemes without being over-
burdened.
The director noted that one plan has already been evaluated. The developer must
evaluate feasibility and staff will evaluate public cost and parking.
Discussion followed relative to the Disposition & Development Agreement (DDA)
between the Agency and Centre City Associates. Mr. Zogob noted that Option "A"
of the DDA provides for a parking structure. Option "B" allows for surface
parking.
Member Scott reiterated his previous suggestion (as stated at the February 28
workshop) about the City guaranteeing the money up front to assist the developer.
Mr. Desrochers remarked that Member Scott's suggestion is still a very viable
idea but there is too much of a risk to guarantee the entire amount proposed
by the developer if he cannot secure a good number of credit tenants.
MOTION
It was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member McCandliss and unanimously
carried that:
1) An alternative financing plan (other than the UDAG) to support the
parking structure be prepared.
2) Evaluate concept plan without a parking structure.
3) Continue our efforts to accommodate a credit tenant market but not
at the expense of substantially distorting the plan's basic concept
that was originally approved.
3/6/80
--- ------.----
-3-
Redevelopment Agency
Workshop Meeti ng March 6, 1980
MOTION TO NO LONGER PURSUE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
It was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member Scott and unanimously carried
to direct staff to no longer pursue residential (senior citizen housing) develop-
ment in the focus area.
Chairman Hyde remarked that Alpha Beta's pla~while not acceptable, does not pre-
clude implementation of further plans with a market.
OPTIONS TO CONSIDER FOR THE "OLD" CENTER
Community Development Director Desrochers pointed out the Agency has no control
over the center at this point in time. Only if remodeling is accomplished does
the Agency have jurisdiction.
Special Counsel Reed told members the Agency does not have funds to acquire the
center (approximately $2 million required).
OWNER PARTICIPATION
The developer reported that he has met with Messrs. Bernes and Isham, and
Ms. Fletcher of the Chula Vista Beauty College. It is felt that Bud's Athletic
Supply is a desirable use in the area, but a beauty college is not. However, a
beauty and supply type operation may be appropriate.
In response to Member Cox's question, Mr. Zogob indicated that the adjacent auto
parts and machine shop can be relocated elsewhere and has never been considered
for retenti on.
The director informed the Agency that staff is preparing an offer for the prin-
ciples involved outlining their options in order to make an evaluation. This
offer should be ready in 30 days.
At this time, Mr. Zogob requested the Agency suggest a timetable for owner partici-
pation to be established.
MOTION FOR FINANCING TIMETABLE
It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Member McCandliss and unanimously
carried that not more than one month after the developer has arranged his finan-
cing, the Agency will make a decision on the matter of owner participation.
MOTION TO SCHEDULE WORKSHOP
It was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member Scott and unanimously carried
to continue to hold workshop sessions following regularly scheduled Redevelopment
Agency meetings, and that they be held in Conference Rooms 2 and 3.
3/6/80
-4-
Redevelopment Agency
Workshop Meeting March 6, 1980
Mr. Desrochers commented on the June 30 deadline for Messrs. Bernes and Isham set
to see if they could comply.
Special Counsel Reed stated that the deadline could not be enforced.
ADJOURNMENT
The workshop meeting was adjourned at 9:54 p.m.
¡;Jl}J¿~
Paul G. Desrochers, Executive Secretary
3/6/80
--------- -----------------~---1--------- ----------------- -----