Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1980/02/19 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Tuesday - 9:02 p.m. February 19, 1980 An adjourned regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista was held on the above date beginning at 9:02 p.m. following the City Council meeting in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California with the following: MEMBERS PRESENT Chairman Hyde; Members McCandliss, Scott, Gillow, Cox Members Absent None STAFF PRESENT Executive Director Cole, Special Counsel Reed, Community Development Director Desrochers, Community Development Coordinator Sanseverino ALSO PRESENT Fred Bors t ITEM NO.1 - RESOLUTION NO. 232 - APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND WALKE~ SCOTT PROPERTIES CORPORATION TO NEGOTIATE EXCLUSIVELY At the February 7 meeting, the Agency postponed this item to this date in order to receive input from the remaining ownerships in the shopping center. On February 14, Chairman Hyde, Member McCandliss and staff met with all parties involved. This meeting resulted in no major changes in the City's efforts to expand the center tot~, ultimate capacity. Under the exclusive negotiation agreement, Walker Scott proposes to limit their "exclusive" to only the area between the Broadway and Sears. Community Development Director Desrochers told the Agency that Walker Scott is pro- posing an amendment to their previous agreement and neither staff nor legal counsel has had the opportunity to thoroughly review this amendment. FRED BORST WALKER SCOTT PROPERTIES CORPORATION 908 Sherman Street San Diego, CA Mr. Borst di scussed the fact that Walker Scott does not suggest the Agency be bound to the six month exclusive negotiation agreement relating to the western portion of the shopping center. (Mr. Borst described this area as displayed for members' review.) Member Scott commented that the responsibility should be coordinated by one body and Walker Scott shouldhave the flexibility to work this into an agreement. Special Counsel Reed briefly commented on the amendment to the previously submitted agreement. He felt that Walker Scott has excl usi ve negoti ati on rights for the redevel- opment of the shopping center and they (Walker Scott) will have to prepare a realistic plan to develop the center with the owners. Therefore, Mr. Reed recommended that the amendment (paragraph 13) be stricken, as it clouds the issue, and that the original agreement be approved. 2/19/80 -2- Adjourned Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting February 19, 1980 Mr. Borst stated that the language proposed in the amendment was only an accommodation to the Agency and not a concession to the private entities. RESOLUTION OFFERED Offered by Member Scott, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Members Scott, Gillow, Cox, Hyde, McCandliss Noes: None Absent: None Mr. Borst further explained his company's anticipation of putting together a meaningful development agreement in six months in order to begin construction in the fall of 1980. (Completion of the project would be in the fall of 1981.) Member Cox commented on staff's agenda statement of February 7 regarding participation of all parties concerned. In this regard, Mr. Borst remarked it would be presumptuous of Walker Scott to approach a program and expect to accomplish it without the coopera- tion of just one or two of the owners. Regarding the Pebruary 14 meeting, Member Cox noted Mr. Nohl 's comments that he was total oblivious to expansion of the center. In response, Mr. Desrochers reiterated that at the beginning of the Town Centre II project, Mr. Nohl was notified of the City's intentions; and, at that time, he re- quested all information be funneled through Mr. Lipp of Carter Hawley Hale. Member Cox also requested the tenants of the existing center by apprised of all devel- opment there. In addition, he suggested Walker Scott work closely with the focus area developer in order to deter competition between the two projects. Member Scott mentioned a remark made at a previous Agency meeting that staff suggest Mr. Zogob seek financial expertise in leasing portions of the focus area. The director stated this item is scheduled for a topic of discussion at the Agency's February 28 workshop meeting. MOTION TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION It was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member McCandliss and unanimously carried to adjourn to executive session to discuss matters of litigation. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Hyde adjourned the meeting at 9:42 p.m. 2/19/80