Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1980/02/07 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Thursday - 7:00 p.m. Februa ry 7, 1980 A regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista was held on the above date beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California with the following MEMBERS PRESENT Chairman Hyde; Members McCandliss, Scott, Gillow, Cox Members Absent None STAFF PRESENT Executive Director Cole, Community Development Director Desrochers, Special Counsel Reed, Community Development Coordinator Sanseverino, Planning Director Peterson ALSO PRESENT Dennis French, Harvey Dick, Jim Mickartz, Sheldon Feinstein, Fred Borst, Robert Bell ITEM NO.1 - APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Member McCandliss, seconded by Chairman Hyde and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of January 2 and 24, 1980 as mailed. (Member Cox abstained on January 24 minutes.) ITEM NO.2 - REPORT: STATUS OF DISPOSITION & DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT COMPANY Orange Development & Investment Company entered into an exclusive negotiation agree- ment in May 1978 and a Disposit;¡on & Development Agreement (DDA) on August 2, 1978. At that time, August 2, a $25,000 cash non-refundable deposit was required of the developer. At the December Agency meeting, the developer was given until February to provide evidence of secured leases and a schedule of performance, or the DDA would be terminated. To date, the schedule of performance has not been submitted. Chairman Hyde remarked that the developer, Mr. Hargraves, spoke to him earlier that afternoon to state that he could not appear before the Agency this ,evening. He further requested another extension. The Chairman indicated that one could be granted perhaps following the City Council meeting on February 12 or 19 to accom- modate the developer. MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM TO FEBRUARY 12, 1980 It was moved by Member Gillow and seconded by Member Cox to continue this item to an Agency meeting following the City Council meeting on February 12, 1980. Community Development Director Desrochers recommended against delaying the project further stating that there are several other developers interested in the project. He strongly recommended the Agency terminate the agreement and retain the $25,000 deposit. Member Scott, speaking against the motion, felt that the first courtesy of the Agency was the extension of the agreement to February. 2/7/80 ~---- - _n____~_-------- -- --- ------- -- --~---- -2- Redevelopment Agency Meeting February 7, 1980 MOTION FAILS The motion to extend the agreement to February 12, 1980 failed 4-1 with Member Gillow voting in favor. MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Member Cox and unanimously carried to ap- prove staff's three recommendations: (1) that the agreement be terminated and the $25,000 deposit be retained; (2) that we offer the property for sale at a higher price than offered to the original developer; and, (3) that staff develop a marketing program and strategy for the property to be brought before the Agency in March. Mr. Desrochers stated he will prepare a two-page leaflet on marketing items relative to criteria for the site that may be ready in two weeks. In response to Member Cox's question to hold a special meeting regarding the reten- tion of the deposit, Special Counsel Reed stated he has requested an executive ses- sion in two weeks to discuss Coastal Commission litigation and this item could also be discussed at that time. MOTION TO SCHEDULE SPECIAL AGENCY MEETING It was moved by Member Cox, seconded by Member Scott and unanimously carried to schedule a special Agency meeting following the City Council meeting on February 19. ITEM NO.3 - REPORT: EQUITY DIRECTIONS - PULLMAN-STANDARD CORPORATION Approximately 17 acres of vacant land along Bay Boulevard south to "L" Street between the freeway and the railroad right-of-way will be purchased by Equity Directions. This sale is conditioned by the Agency's willingness to institute "friendly condemnation" proceedings and the submission of an acceptable development proposal from the developer. DENNIS FRENCH EQUITY DIRECTIONS, INC. 2152 Dupont, Suite 217 Irvi ne, CA Mr. French discussed the concept plan on display for members' review. He disclosed that there would be a theme restaurant, and a "JoJo's" along with a fast-food drive- thru restaurant which would be Naugle's. In addition, Equity Directions has prepared a development plan that incorporates the construction of a major research development facility for the Pullman-Standard Corporation of Chicago. Member Scott commented that the City Council is studying the possibility of elimi- nating drive-thrus as a gas conservation measure. Mr. French stated it was his opinion that a drive-thru off of 1-5 would not contribute to excess use of gas. In fact, it would be accommodating to freeway drivers. 2/7/80 - ----------_mn-------- n-- nU_- ------- -3- Redevelopment Agency Meeting February 7, 1980 Discussion followed on the freeway signing/identity of the restaurants. Mr. French remarked that his sign consultants are studying two different approaches: (1) one large, well-designed theme sign identifying the project to be done in a quality manner; and, (2) two mall signs - one for each commercial structure. HARVEY DICK PULLMAN-STANDARD CORPORATION 4045 Bonita Road, Suite 206 Bonita, CA 92002 Mr. Dick, vice president of this company, discussed the financial and project back- ground of Pullman-Standard Corporation. He described the research and development type of project his company is associated with. The project will consist of an office building that will house analytical and design engineers. Total employment initially is expected to be 60 people with the possibility of future expansion and additional employment of up to 200 people. Mr. Dick indicated this project is scheduled to be considered by the Board of Directors at their April meeting in Chicago. SHELDON FEINSTEIN ENGINEERING ALLIANCE CORPORATION Mr. Feinstein, architectural and engineering consultant, commented that a soils study on the property has been conducted along with a preliminary site plan. He discussed Pullman's desire to build a showplace facility that would house engineers and research personnel to design and test prototy)e rail cars. A $10 million in- vestment is planned (including land and buildings. MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT It was moved by Member Cox, seconded by Member Gillow and unanimously carried to accept staff's recommendation for preparation of a DDA. Mr. Desrochers informed the Agency that with their approval, special counsel will begin processing documents and will arrange transfer of title upon preparation of the DDA. ITEM NO.4 - REPORT: a) BAYFRONT RAMADA INN UPDATE b) BAYFRONT IDENTITY STRUCTURE On January 2, 1980, the Agency approved the Bayfront Ramada Inn precise development plan. With this action, the proponent and City staff are enabled to move forward and begin implementation of the project. Member Scott remarked that he is not convinced it would be appropriate to pursue IDB bonds due to the potential liability of the City and the possible jeopardy to the City because of all the bonds that have recently been issued. 2/7/80 -4- Revelo~ment Agency Meeting February 7,1980 Co~munity Development Director Desrochers explained that the IDB method is the same type used for construction purposes in Town Centre I. He a 1 so noted that Ramada Inn has been involved in several IDB methods in other states. With regard to Member Scott's question, he stated that those concerns will be researched. MOTION TO ACCEPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION It was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member Gillow and unanimously carried to accept staff's recommendation (accept report and authorize exploratory talks relative to issuance of mortgage revenue bonds.) ITEM NO.5 - REPORT: BAYFRONT SIGN CRITERIA At the January meeting, the Agency disapproved the proposed Ramada Inn, E Street, identification sign because it did not appear to conform to the design criteria as proposed. by Sedway-Cooke. At the Agency's direction, Community Development reviewed the sign criteria as established by Sedway-Cooke. MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT It was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member Cox and unanimously carried to accept staff's recommendations: (1) reaffirm existing Sedway-Cooke sign criteria concept as the governing policy for the Bayfront; (2) direct Community Development staff to prepare an RFP soliciting proposals for development of Bayfront Sign Program; and, (3) not permit the Ramada Inn sign on E Street until it can be reviewed in the context of an overall sign program. ITEM NO.6 - RESOLUTION NO. 231 - AMENDING AGREEMENT WITH PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTANTS AND APPROPRIATING $3,500 FOR' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Due to the lack of Engineering staff time available and engineering expertise neces- sary to conduct the studies, outside services were deemed necessary. Therefore, the Redevelopment Agency entered into an agreement with Project Design Consultants for the planning and coordination of utility development on Bay Boulevard north of "G" Street and for the preparation of street widening plans for "E" Street. Now, a new proposal for the Bayfront has been submitted consisting of preliminary concept plans for the "J" Street area of Bay Boulevard. A study will identify existing and future utility needs in the subject vicinity. RESOLUTION OFFERED Offered by Member Cox, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Members Cox, Hyde, McCandliss, Scott, Gillow Noes: None Absent: None 2/7/80 ___m_m_m___-- --------------- -5- Redevelopment Agency Meeting Februa ry 7, 1980 ITEM NO.7 - RESOLUTION - AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND WALKER SCOTT PROPERTIES CORPORATION TO NEGOTIATE EXCLU- SIVELY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A PORTION OF TOWN CENTRE PROJECT II In accordance with the Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan, a major department store, along with retail shops connecting the shopping center now bisected by Fifth Avenue, wi II be added. Walker Scott has asked to be designated as the "lead" entity in the expanded center. FRED BORST WALKER SCOTT PROPERTIES CORPORATION 908 Sherman San Diego, CA Mr. Borst stated that the Walker Scott company is in the process of expansion and will be opening a 120,000 square foot store in Santee. Phase I of their proposal for Town Centre II calls for an 80,000 square foot Walker Scott store within an enclosed mall of two levels. Discussion followed relative to Sears' concern about removal of their TBA store, keeping Fifth Avenue open, and minimal disturbance to The Broadway. Mr. Borst indi- cated he hoped the majority of the obstacles can be overcome in a meeting with all entities involved on February 14. Members discussed the possibility of holding action over following the outcome of the joint meeting on February 14. Mr. Borst indicated he would not object. MOTION TO DELAY ACTION It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Chairman Hyde and unanimously carried to delay action on this item until February 19 following the City Council meeting. ITEM NO. 18 - REPORT: SUBMITTAL OF ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATE OF THE TOWN CENTRE DESIGN MANUAL In accordance with the Town Centre Design Manual, the Design Review Board is to submit an annual report of the Design Manual to the Agency. MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Member Cox and unanimously carried to accept the report. ITEM NO.9 - REPORT: TOWN CENTRE I PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Street improvements on Third Avenue between "E" and "F" Streets have been completed and accepted by the City. However, questions have arisen regarding quality and/or location of several public telephones within the area. Member McCandliss questioned the abandonment of custom design booths. In reply, Mr. Desrochers stated the phone company indicated the City would be responsible for cost and maintenance of these booths, and presently such funds are not available for this purpose. 2/7/80 ~non~io< ~+ +ho ~b+o 10uo1 Thic +n~m,HM h,c m'+o~i,H~^,' ,- "n +n __n__+ 1__i_1, -6- Redevelopment Agency Meeting February 7, 1980 Member McCandliss requested staff provide the Agency with more information and dis- plays of the various types of phone booths available. MOTION ON STYLE OF PHONE BOOTHS It was moved by Member McCandliss that staff be directed to prepare the necessary in- formation for Agency consideration to look into future style changes of telephone booths. Member Scott seconded the motion and offered an amendment that staff provide the Agency with the differences in the phone booths available (i.e., cost, etc.). MOTION CARRIED The motion, as amended, passed unanimously. ITEM NO. 10 - REPORT: ACQUISITION, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND RELOCATION IN THE TOWN CENTRE FOCUS AREA In addition to the process of land purchase, fixtures and equipment, property man- agement and relocation, staff is providing property management services and col- 1 ecti ng rent. MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT It was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member Gillow and unanimously carried to accept the report. ITEM NO. 11 - REPORT: OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT - CHANGE IN TEXT Special Counsel has reviewed our standard owner participation agreement for adequacy due to the number- of completed rehabilitation projects and the acceleration of anti- cipated improvements. MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT It was moved by Member Cox, seconded by Member Scott and unanimously carried to accept the report. ITEM NO. 12 - REPORT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATORS MEMBERSHIP A new organization has been formed out of Orange County for the purpose of representing agencies at the State level. This formation has materialized due to recent legisla- tion and ballot initiatives. MOTION TO ACCEPT REPORT It was moved by Chairman Hyde, seconded by Member Gillow and unanimously carried to accept staff's recommendation and to direct staff to prepare a report, one year hence, if the Agency wishes to retain its membership. Member Scott pointed out the agenda statement does not reflect a 4/5th's vote but in- dicated that vote would be required since appropriation of funds is the case. 2/7/80 m_~---- -~--- -7- Redevelopment Agency Meeting February 7, 1980 Discussion ensued relative to the League of California Cities' association with this organization. Special Counsel Reed strongly supported membership in this organization. He pointed out that the League of California Cities is not knowledgeable enough about redevelop- ment activities and it would be beneficial for Mr. Desrochers to actively participate in the organization's activities. MEMBERS' COMMENTS Member Scott suggested the Focus Area developer, Richard Zogob, utilize the services of an institution that has the leasing expertise and performs this expertise on a daily basis. He stated this may be the key element in developing Third Avenue. Special Counsel Reed concurred that in accordance with the parameters of our DDA with Centre City Associates, the type of suggestion Member Scott mentioned should be made. Chairman Hyde recommended this suggestion be docketed for the special Agency meeting in this regard on February 28. Executive Director Cole informed the Agency that the Sweetwater Authority will be spilling over 50 to 60 cubic feet of water either Friday (2/8) or Monday (2/11). Community Development Director Desrochers mentioned that staff is preparing a state- ment on the Coastal Commission Wetlands Policy and a meeting with Dr. Lacey (WESTEC) and Dr. Smith has been scheduled for next week. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. to the special Agency meeting of February 19, 1980. -~I -~ l /,/ -_."--~// ./' / / --;;j- / ,- -' , .~4'Z - t~;¡-~ßÞV~-¡::(;Z/-.-/ Paul G. Desrochers, Execut1ve Secretary 2/7/80 ------------ ------- ------- - ---"