HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 2004/06/23 GMOC
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
June 23, 2004 JOHN LIPPITT PUBLIC WORKS CENTER
6:00 P.M. 1800 MAXWELL ROAD
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Davis, McCann, Rindone, Salas, and Mayor Padilla
1. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ESTABLISHING A COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION PROGRAM IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE SECTIONS 218.3,
331.1, 366, 366.2, 381.1, 394, AND 394.25, ALLOWING THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, ACTING AS THE MUNICIPAL ENERGY UTILITY, TO AGGREGATE THE
ELECTRICAL LOAD OF ELECTRICITY CONSUMERS WITHIN THE CITY
(SECOND READING)
At the June 8, 2004 Council meeting, the Council approved staffs recommendation to
begin to implement a phased approach to the Municipal Energy Utility (MEV) business
models recommended by the MEU Feasibility Study, which included Community Choice
Aggregation. On June 8, 2004, Council also directed staff to return with an ordinance for
its review and consideration declaring the Chula Vista MEU a Community Choice
Aggregator (CCA). This ordinance was introduced at the Regular Meeting of June 15,
2004. (Assistant City Manager Morris)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the ordinance.
2. CONSIDERATION OF A REPORT REGARDING THE PROPOSED GROWTH
MANAGEMENT WORK PROGRAM (Continued from June 15,2004)
On May 27, 2004, the City's growth management consultant, Walter Kieser, from
Economic and Planning Systems, Inc., presented to Council a White Paper with options
regarding the City's growth management program. Based on Council's response, a
proposed work program has been prepared. (Director of Planning and Building)
Staff recommendation: Council accept the report and provide guidance on the proposed
work program.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
ADJOURNMENT to the Regular Meeting of July 13, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am
employed by the City of Chula Vista in the.
Office of the City Clerk and that I posted thiS
document on the bulletin board according to
Brown Act requirements.
Dated (o!n!Ol{ Slgned~IAI.R.)Últ~
OROINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA EST~
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION ~ M IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA PUBLI ITIES CODE
SECTIONS 218.3, 331.1, 366, ~~ 1.1, 394, AND
394.25,ALLOWING CHULA VIST AGGREGATE THE
ELECTRICAL LOAD OF ELECT~él~ CONSUMERS WITHIN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
WHEREAS, at Council's direction, staff began implementing the City's Energy
Strategy and Action Plan, adopted in May, 2001; and
WHEREAS, a significant component of the strategy required an analysis of the
costs, benefits and risks associated with fo=ing and operating a municipal energy utility,
(MEU); and
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2002, the Governor signed into law Chapter 838
which authorizes any California city, county, or city and county, whose governing board
so elects, to combine the electricity loads of its residents and businesses in a community-
wide electricity buyers' program known as Community Choice Aggregation; and
WHEREAS, at the May 19, 2004 MEU Workshop and Council Meeting, the City
Council listened to approximately five and one half hours of expert testimony and public
input regarding the potential development of a Chula Vista public utility; and
WHEREAS, at the June 8, 2004 workshop, the City Council directed staff to
return to the June 15,2004 City Council meeting with an ordinance declaring the Chula
Vista MEU (established on June 5, 2001, by Ordinance No. 2835) a Community Choice
Aggregator, and to further consider the MEU Feasibility Study Consultants'
recommendations to implement selected MEU business models; and
WHEREAS, as a Community Choice Aggregator, the City could have a
significant additional means of increasing the scale and cost-effectiveness of
conservation, energy efficiency and renewable energy in Chula Vista.
WHEREAS, the existing energy policy and previously articulated Council support
for quality jobs and the increased use ofrenewable energy, energy conservation and
efficiency, the recommended and proposed CCA MEU business model provides the
Council with an opportunity to develop and incorporate economically viable and local
renewable resources in the City's energy portfolio.
WHEREAS, Community Choice Aggregation provides a means of exercising
local control over electricity rates and future increases, resources, quality of service, and
designing local energy systems to protect against future blackouts.
.1 ,...],
WHEREAS, it is important that the City of Chula Vista act expeditiously to
implement a Community Choice Aggregation regime in order to properly engage the
CPUC in rulemaking related to Community Choice Aggregation; and
WHEREAS, under California Law (Public Utilities Code §366.2 and other
sections of Chapter 838 of2002, formerly ABI17), for Chula Vista to implement
Community Choice Aggregation so that it may find a new electric service provider for
the residents and businesses within its jurisdiction, the City Council must proceed via a
series of ordinances. The Public Utilities Code further provides the following:
A. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) must establish rules by
which any entity can seek to provide electricity aggregation service, now
being undertaken in Rulemakings 03-10-003 and 01-08-028;
B. All electrical corporations must cooperate with entities investigating, pursuing
or implementing Community Choice Aggregation, and provide them with
billing and electrical load data, subject to rules established by CPUC;
C. A Community Choice Aggregator may apply to become the administrator for
cost-effective energy efficiency and conservation programs for its retail
electric customers;
D. A Community Choice Aggregator must develop an implementation Plan
detailing the process and consequences of aggregation, which must be adopted
by the Board of Supervisors at a duly noticed public hearing by ordinance;
E. Potential Community Choice Aggregation customers must be fully informed
of the program and be given ample opportunity to opt out pursuant to Section
366.2(c)(lI) of the Public Utilities Code.
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista ordains as follows:
Section I. COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The City shall develop a Draft Implementation for a Community Choice Aggregation
(CCA) program for Chula Vista for consideration by the City Council consistent with
Section 366.2(c)(lI) of the Public Utilities Code, and other sections of Chapter 838 of
2002 - formerly AB 117.
Section II: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from
and after its second reading and adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Ann Moore
City Attorney
J..&
¡
(lorre ued C!r'f
f0. a~ /h..'Ù1/J
Environmental Health Coalition + South Bay GTeens + San Diego Baykeeper +
Paul Fenn of Local Power + Sierra Club, San Diego Chapter + Jim Bell of Ecological
Life Systems Institute + Imperial Beach Councilmember Patricia McCoy + American
Wind Energy Association + Kurt 1. Kammerer of Energy Solutions Partners
June 23, 2004
g~
:-::t,
5 r::.. ~
Mayor Stephen C. Padilla and Chula Vista Council Members ~ ...,
276 Fourth Avenue ~ t.~
Chula Vista, California 91910 ";:" ¡;;:
Co) I '£
Comments on Ordinance ofthe City Council of Chula Vista Establishing r À. ~"
Community Choice Aggregation Program ~
Re:
Dear Honorable Mayor Padilla and Council Members:
The undersigned ofthis letter are writing to express our support for the City of
Chula Vista's efforts to create a Municipal Energy Utility ("MEU") via a joint
Community Choice Aggregation ("CCA") and Greenfield approach,
We recognize that by supporting this ordinance, the City will not only realize
great long-term savings in the cost of electricity, but the City will also have the historic
opportunity to purchase and develop a substantial amount of its own energy that is clean
and renewable (such as solar and wind), while creating quality jobs for the City's
residents.
We believe that the City has an urgent public health and environmental need to
facilitate the rapid and large-scale development of clean renewable energy and
conservation resources within the City as part of a plan to retire old, inefficient, and
polluting electric generation plants currently located within the City, as well as a social,
ecological, and economic need for stable electricity prices, reliability, reasonable
electricity rates, and sustainability. To address these urgent needs, we believe that CCA
offers significant additional means of increasing the scale and cost-effectiveness of clean
renewable energy (i.e. solar and wind energy), energy efficiency, and conservation, while
at the same time providing reasonably priced and reliable electricity to City customers.
In addition, we believe that CCA allows the City to plan for a future that is not wholly
reliant on fossil-fueled energy.
Therefore, we commend the City ofChula Vista for creating such opportunities
for its residents and taking the much-needed leadership in the region on energy issues.
(1_, /Ý!W¿jtrT ~ 6tW·70J
(!/'hJ /YJa.n.04A
(h I~W lYLt~t-~
~/h/ fti1vTÝ1 e '/
1
Other Key Reasons for Our Support
First and foremost, we support CCA because it has been proven to do exactly
what it advertises - it gives the community a choice and voice in local energy decisions.
Without Community Choice, customers must rely on investor-owned utility ("IOU")
companies that serve the interests oftheir shareholders and who have no direct local
accountability. As we've seen in San Francisco and cities throughout the country, CCA
allows the power to return to the people.
The second reason we support a CCA is that it creates the opportunity to
aggressively develop truly "green, " not "green-washed," renewable power - that is non-
polluting, non-fossil-fueled power such as solar and wind. By concentrating buying
power in a publicly accountable local government, consumers can require that a supplier
of electricity provide "green" power in their energy portfolio.
Finally, we support CCA because it allows the local government to use monies
earned from electric sales to fund local programs that reduce overall demand (i.e. energy
efficiency and conservation technologies) and to invest in clean renewable energy. As a
ŒA, the City could collect and manage allocations and expenditures of Public Benefit
Funds and allocate them to program categories, such as renewable energy resources and
development, and energy efficiency and energy conservation technologies. In other words,
the City could prioritize or earmark funding to applicable programs based on local needs and
desires. Under the IOU model, the utility is required to spend these funds in the area
prescribed by California legislation, but there is no local flexibility to determine which
categories the funds go to. For example of the scale of this, SDG&E currently collects $37
million annually from customers in the San Diego region for Public Benefit Programs, of
that amount, approximately $3 million comes from Chula Vista. Under CCA, the City
would have control of its $3 million share and could choose to put it towards local projects
and programs that support renewable energy, energy efficiency, and conservation.
Implementation Plan
One ofthe most important next steps that the City will take is the development of
an Implementation Plan. The Plan will be critical to ensuring that the local region
secures the full benefit ofthe CCA, We understand that community support will be
crucial to the success of this endeavor.
As a result, we request that the City create a community stakeholder or work
group committee to provide public input and support to the drafting of the City's
Implementation Plan for CCA. The key word in Community Choice Aggregation is the
word "community," and we believe that the community must play an important role in
advising the City as it plans its new energy future.
2
Conclusion
We appreciate the City's recognition of CCA as an opportunity to forge a new and
sustainable energy future. We understand that this ordinance is the first step on the long
road to energy independence for the City. Thank you for your time and consideration of
our comments and request. We look forward to working with the City as it move towards
energy independence and a sustainable future.
Sincerely,
Albert Huang, Esq.
Policy Advocate
Environmental Health Coalition
Lupita Jimenez
Chair
South Bay Greens
Gabe Solmer, Esq.
Staff Attorney
San Diego Baykeeper
Dan Perkins
Chair, Energy Committee
Sierra Club
San Diego Chapter
Jim Bell
Director
Ecological Life Systems Institute
Paul Fenn
Author of AB 117
Executive Director
Local Power
Kurt J. Kammerer
KJ Kammerer and Associates
Patricia McCoy
Councilmember
City ofImperial Beach
Mike McCoy, DVM
Alan Ridley
Chula Vista Resident
Member, American Wind Energy
Association
cc:
Mr, Tom Orreola, Chief of Staff for the Mayor
Mr, Sid Morris, Assistant City Manager
Mr. David D. Rowlands Jr., City Manager
Mr. Michael T. Meacham, Director of Environmental and Conservation Services
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item: ;r
Meeting Date~/~
~/;B/ó'l
ITEM TITLE: Report: Proposed Growth Management Work Program
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning and Buildin~
REVIEWED BY: ,~¡;" rl (4/5ths Vote: Yes _No.xJ
City Manager J.-I iJ On May 27,2004 the City's growth management consultant, Walter Kieser from Economic and
Planning Systems, Inc., presented to Council a White Paper with options regarding the City's growth
management program. Based on Council's response, a proposed work program has been prepared.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council provides guidance on the proposed work program.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
In it's 2002 Annual Report, presented on June 12, 2003, the Growth Management Oversight
Commission supported the Council's call for the "top to bottom" review of the growth management
program.
DISCUSSION:
A proposed narrative work program (Attachment 1) has been prepared by the consultant in
collaboration with City staff. The Work Program provides info=ation on the proposed content to
follow-up on Council's direction to:
. Investigate revising threshold standards recognizing emerging policy objectives within
Western Chula Vista versus the suburban new development focus of the existing threshold
standards. These revised thresholds will reflect the emerging urban character ofthe Urban
Core and possibly other redeveloping portions of western Chula Vista.
. Develop amended threshold standards based upon an assessment of the current threshold's
utility, to reflect new service delivery methods and measurement techniques.
. Prepare proposed techniques that allow control of development activity beyond current
methods that will provide the Council with flexibility of response. While an annual city-
wide growth "cap" that sets a specific upward limit upon the number of residential units that
~I
Page 2, Item No. ~
Meeting Date: 06/15/04
are issued building pe=its for the purposes of controlling the rate of growth is not
contemplated by this work program, the ability to establish short te= controls to address or
avoid a threshold violation is suggested to be analyzed as a tool. This could result in
establishing a program such as the current "Pennit Monitoring Program" as an example.
. Investigate improved regional and intergovernmental cooperation efforts for threshold
compliance not within the City's jurisdiction.
With the initial Council direction received on May 27,2004, and further comments this evening,
each of the 4 components will proceed on interrelated parallel tracks in revising the growth
management element of the general plan. The Growth Management Oversight Commission and the
General Plan Update Steering Committee will be solicited for their comments and recommendations
on various aspects of the growth management program. For example, the General Plan Steering
Committee as well as the GMOC will review proposed revisions to the General Plan Growth
Management Element. The GMOC will also be involved in potential changes to the current GMOC
process. In addition, staff from affected City departments and external agencies will be involved as
essential participants in the review process. Ultimately, revisions to the growth management
program will be comprised of a new Growth Management Element of the General Plan and a new
Growth Management Ordinance for Council action.
The new Growth Management Element will be drafted by mid July 2004. The updated growth
management ordinance will be in the drafting process concurrent to the element but will not be in
final draft from until late summer. The Growth Management Program will be the subject of a
separate process that follows both the Growth Management Element and ordinance, and is expected
to be drafted during the fall of2004.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time. This work is part of the contract for services entered into with Economic and
Planning Systems, Inc.
Attachments
Attachment 1: Growth Management Program Work Program
:1:~
Econo
Planning Systems
&,' E..", &'Mmi"
&gi""" E,oo,mi"
,,"bl~Fi=n"
Land u~ Poli"
MEMORANDUM
To: Dan Forster, Growth Management Coordinator
From: Walter Kieser
Subject: Refinement Contract Scope of Work, Chula Vista Growth Management
Program; EPS #14022
Date: June 9, 2004
This Memorandum outlines a proposed direction for subsequent consultant work effort
in Task 2 of our Scope of Work. Task 2 contemplated technical assistance with the
redrafting the Growth Management Ordinance. The research conducted as a part of
preparing the White Paper, the City staff interaction, and the guidance from the City
Council received at the May 27th meeting, all provide a basis for the technical effort
required prior to amending the Growth Management Ordinance. I have considered
each of these in formulating a proposed focus for the Task 2 effort, as outlined below.
Following City review we can finalize this direction and proceed with the work effort.
THRESHOLD STANDARDS FOR URBAN DENSITY AREAS
The key changes to the Growth Management Ordinance related to the Urban Density
Area (e.g. the Urban Core Area) relate to the traffic threshold, although each of the
threshold standards should be considered for there applicability to urban density areas.
Regarding the transportation threshold, there appears to be general agreement that a
revised urban standard is needed to complement the desired level of urban
intensification and development in these areas. The work required here is collaboration
with City Department of Engineering staff and their transportation consultants to
develop the technical and policy components of the new threshold.
. The technical efforts include modification of the traffic modeling efforts to reflect
differential trip generation from urban mixed use areas, including demographic
differences in households, the greater propensity of "internal trips", and the greater
use of alternative modes of transportation including transit. It is presumed that
these modifications will be applied to the results of the ongoing traffic modeling
efforts. There will also be the need to develop corridor improvement programs for
key urban corridors such as H Street.
BERKELEY y SACRAMENTO DENVER
2501 Ninth St.. Suito 200 Phon" 510-841-9190 Phon" 916-649-8010 Phon" 303-623-3557
8,,'oloy. CA 94710-2515 Fo" 510-841-9208 Fa<' 916-649-2070 Fa<' 303-623-9049
WWW.op'y'.oom
3-3
--~._---~~~_.~-----------
Memorandum June 8, 2004
Dan Forster Page 2
. The policy effort, ultimately reflected in the Growth Management Ordinance, will
involve creation of a new street classification "urban arterial", adding to the three
already existing in the Ordinance. The other policy will be selecting the "LOS" to
apply to the designated urban arterials, for example, the LOS could be set at "E", or
specific road segments exempted altogether from the standards.
Another example of a revised or reapplied standard is for community and neighborhood
parks. While the three acres per thousand population standard currently applied in
Eastern Chula Vista is impossible to achieve in Western Chula Vista due to the lack of
available park sites, a facility-based standard linked to a Western Chula Vista Parks
Master Plan could be included so that opportunities to improve and expand parks in
Western Chula Vista are pursued.
The Consultant will assist staff with the technical and policy aspects of the new
transportation and other thresholds for urban density areas.
UPDATED CITYWIDE THRESHOLD STANDARDS
The White Paper identified potential modifications to several threshold standards that
will be further explored, including:
. Converting library and parks and fire standards to facility concurrency based
thresholds rather that a level of service as is currently applied. This change is
recommended since the facilities required to achieve the desired thresholds in each
of these cases have been identified in respective facility master plans; the change will
simplify administration of the thresholds.
. Refining threshold standards for traffic, police, and fiscal analysis. These thresholds
would benefit from technical improvements that better reflect =rent conditions and
measurement methods.
. Altering threshold standards not directly enforceable by the City. These thresholds
need a clearer statement of the City's limited ability to enforce any violation.
Stronger intergovernmental and regional efforts are encouraged.
The Consultant will assist staff with crafting the new threshold standards, including
meetings with department staff members, additional research, and drafting language.
The area requiring the greatest effort may involve the Police Department; Department
staff members are presently working on this matter and are expected to provide their
recommendations in the near future.
tL-4 GMm""06-D9-04.d,,
Memorandum June 8, 2004
Dan Forster Page 3
ENHANCED GROWTH CONTROLS
The White Paper described a set of options for imposing annual city-wide growth caps
on development in Chula Vista given concerns that the rate of growth, in certain
circumstances, make achieving individual thresholds difficult and affect overall quality
of life in the City. The City Council directed that no further research be conducted on
the matter. Given the thoughtful discussion on the matter it is proposed that policy
language be included in the General Plan Growth Management Element that specifies
and allows the City Council, subject to specific findings such as a forecasted threshold
failure, to impose a short term (Le. a period of one to three years) growth limitation or
metering similar to what was done when creating the 3 years "Permit Monitoring"
program. Under tlùs proposal similar language would be included in the Growth
Management Ordinance.
Another possible approach for controlling growth, during periods of very rapid
development, would be to institute sequential map and permit processing. Sequential
processing helps to insures a standard level of quality.
The Consultant will assist staff in drafting the policy and ordinance language, including
delineating the necessary findings for taking such an actions.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND REGIONAL COOPERATION
The White Paper described several areas where intergovernmental and regional
cooperation could be improved to enhance the quality of life in Chula Vista. While these
efforts lie beyond the purview of the Growth Management Ordinance, they were
endorsed by the City Council, especially the proposed effort to improve cooperation
with the school districts. While State statute restricts the ability of the City to condition
new development related to school capacity, cooperative efforts, such as those outlined
in the Chu/a Vista City/Schools Community Task Force Report (March 2003), have the
potential for improving schools and their performance in the City.
The Consultant will assist staff in exploring the potential "next steps" to implementing
Task Force recommendations and other proposal that may have more recently been
developed.
:1-6 GMm=O6-<J9-04.do<
------ ------------ -