HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 2000/02/22
"I dee'ore "'n-'e~ reM:t" n' rcr;',"" t'"t I ar,l
em'):o/C':I b> ',;:'U 3 Vista in the
Q",ce 0,' 'i"" 'n:! t',ot : posóod
t, ,0 Þ ::n"'I;;'-';'" '., ,:,.,!!,,'n Boa,d nt
AGENDA tlC¡'U"'I¥"~f"" i'~atC¡:'./~'~
DAi ED.' /;; 5i'~NED 'tf4¡Þ""'" U-t-c-:,
FEBRUARY 22, 2000 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas, and Mayor Horton.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items I through 6)
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent
Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion, without discussion, unless
a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that the item be
removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out
a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk
prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed
after Action Items, Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business,
1. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter ITom the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge ITOm
observance of actions taken in Closed Session on February 15, 2000, there were
no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported.
Staff recommendation: The letter be received and filed.
B. Letter ITom Dulce Alvarez, a student at Bonita Vista High School, requesting
financial assistance towards her expenses to compete in the Miss Teenage
California Scholarship Pageant.
Staff recommendation: The request be denied. This event does not meet the
criteria established in Council Policy 159-02, as it provides no "tangible benefit to
the City."
2. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ADOPTING AN AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE EASTLAKE COMPANY, LLC
FOR EASTLAKE III (TRAILS, WOODS, VISTAS, BUSINESS CENTER
EXPANSION, OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER AND LAND SWAP) (CONTINUED
FROM THE MEETING OF 2/1/2000 - SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
This item is to consider an amended and restated development agreement for EastLake
III. The original development agreement was executed and recorded in April 1990 and
will expire in April 2000, Both the City and EastLake are desirous of extending the tenn
of the agreement for another 10 years to April 2010. The basic provisions of the
agreement remain unchanged; the focus of the amendment is an update and change to
reflect contemporaneous conditions in City codes and ordinances. Also, the provisions of
certain park agreements entered into since 1990 are incorporated so that all of those
provisions are consoJidated into one document. The amended development agreement
will cover 1,514 acres ofthe approximate 3,000 acres of original EastLake property.
Staff recommendation: Council place the ordinance on second reading for adoption.
(Director of Planning and Building)
3. RESOLUTJON OF THE CJTY COUNCIL OF THE CJTY OF CHULA VJSTA
APPROVING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CJTY OF CHULA VISTA AND RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY FOR
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THREE
INTERCHANGES WJTH INTERSTATE 805 AT TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD,
OLYMPIC PARKWAY AND PALOMAR STREET; WAIVING THE CONSULTANT
SELECTJON PROCESS; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
AMENDMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND APPROPRIATING $73,700 IN
TRANSPORTATJON DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO PROJECT NO. 24093270
(4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED)
On January 23, 1996, Council adopted Resolution No. 18193, approving a contract with
Rick Engineering for preliminary engineering design services for three interchanges on
Interstate 805 at Telegraph Canyon Road, Olympic Parkway, and Palomar Street. Since
then, due to additional work requirements by Caltrans, five amendments to this contract
have been made. This sixth amendment will provide for the finaJ design of Olympic
Parkway, between Oleander and Brandywine. The design includes the preparation of
plans, specifications and estimate, modification of the existing project study report, the
project report, and environmental documents for said segment of Olympic Parkway. It
also allows for reimbursable expenses incurred in the compJetion of this work.
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
4. RESOLUTJON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ACCEPTING $74,595 OF HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA)
GRANT FUNDS FOR ADMINISTRATJVE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
CALIFORNIA BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP (CBAG); AND AMENDING THE
FISCAL YEAR 2000/01 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING THE UNANTJCIPATED
GRANT REVENUES AND APPROVING ONE ADDITJONAL POSITJON IN THE
POLICE DEPARTMENT (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED)
On September 5, 1995, Council approved the City's role as "fiscal agent" for the
California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) and as a conduit to hire support personnel and
acquire necessary supplies and services. The mission of CBAG is to develop multi-
jurisdictionaJ, cooperative strategies to gather intelligence on drug traffickers, investigate
drug trafficking activities, arrest persons involved in illegal drug trafficking activities,
and to prosecute those arrested. CBAG receives an annual allocation of HIDTA funds
each fiscal year trom which the City is reimbursed. The City also receives 2% of those
costs for administration of the grant.
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Chief of Police)
Page 2 - Council Agenda 02/22/2000
5. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL TO SANDAG OF TWO APPLICATIONS FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2000/01 2% NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) AND TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX (TRANSNET)
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECT FUNDS
The City annually submits an updated Jist of projects for inclusion in the seven-year
implementation program of the non-motorized element of the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program. SANDAG regulations require that official applications be
submitted to SANDAG in order for projects to be considered by its Board of Directors
for funding. In order for the applications to be official, Council must adopt a resolution
authorizing submittal of the Fiscal Year 2000/01 non-motorized transportation project
applications for available TDA and TransNet funds. Both funding sources fonn a single
fund with annual allocations totaJing $2.5 million for the San Diego region. Projects are
chosen and then approved for funding after the applications have been evaluated by
SANDAG's Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee.
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
6. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE 619 AREA CODE OVERLAY AND
RECOMMENDING SAID OVERLAY TO THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION
At its meeting of February IS, 2000, Council directed staff to schedule adoption of a
resolution supporting the 619 area code overlay.
Recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Mayor Horton)
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial
discussion and deliberation by the Council, staff, or members of the public. The
items will be considered individually by the Council, and staff recommendations
may, in certain cases, be presented in the alternative. If you wish to speak on any
item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and
submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting.
7, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT A PILOT
PROJECT TO DEVELOP A RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR
REGULATING THE PLACEMENT OF UTILITY BOXES IN THE PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO REPLACE APPROXIMATELY 180 EXISTING POWER SUPPLIES IN
THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH APPROXIMATELY 90 POWER
SUPPLIES IN COOPERATION WITH COX COMMUNICATIONS AS PART
OF THE PILOT
Page 3 - Council Agenda 02/22/2000
Staff IS recommending that Council authorize the development and
implementation of a pilot program that will establish unifonn procedures and
standards for the regulation of large utility installations that are placed above
ground in the public right-of-way. The impetus for this program is Cox
Communications' proposal to install 90 to 120 "Network Reliability Units" in the
next six months. Staff then expects to come back with a refined version of the
program for Council consideration.
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution and direct staff to return to
Council with a recommendation for an ordinance that will update the
specifications for placing utility boxes, pedestals or other equipment above
ground in the public right-of-way. (Special Projects Manager)
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
OTHER BUSINESS
8. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
A. Scheduling of meetings.
9. MAYOR'S REPORTS
A. Ratification of appointment to the Library Board of Trustees - Tris Hubbard.
B. Ratification of appointment to the Board of Ethics - Charles Bull.
10, COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT to a Closed Session and thence to an adjourned meeting of February 29,
2000 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Page 4 - Council Agenda 02/22/2000
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 22, 2000 Council Conference Room
6:00 P.M. Administration Building
Immediately following City Council Meeting
CALL TO ORDER
1. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas, and Mayor Horton.
2. WORKSHOP ESTABLISHING A VISION AND DIRECTION FOR THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA
Consultant Gary Winters will be working with Council to discuss concepts such as goals,
visions, missions and core values,
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
ADJOURNMENT to the Regular Meeting of February 22, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
Tuesday, February 22, 2000 Couucil Chambers
6:00 p.m. Public Services Building
(immediately following the City Council Meeting)
CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. Unless the City
Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will
discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are permitted by law to be the
subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in
closed session to best protect the interests of the City. The Council is required by law to return
to open session, issue any reports of final action taken in closed session, and the votes taken.
However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be
terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session,
reports offinal action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped, Nevertheless, the report of
final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's
Office.
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING SIGNIFICANT
EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.9(8)
A. One case
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A)
A. Fritsch v. City ofChula Vista, USDC, 98-CV-O972-E (CGA)
B. D' AbJaing Workers' Compensation Claim, CV980125
409 Palm Ave., suite 100, Imperial Beach, CA 91932-1121 Tel: (619)429 7946
Feb. 12, 2000
I know no s.fe depository of the ulti_te poorer. of
the society but 'the people thell.elve.; end
if ",e think the" not enliqhtened enough
to exereie_ their control with.
",holesolle di.cretion, the r_ec:ty i.
not to take it. frOlR th_1I but to inforlll their
discretion. ThOll.. Jefferson
Septellber 28, 1820
MEMORANDUM
TO: San Diego county Board of supervisors, Who are also the
Air pollution control District Board
Attn: Ron Roberts
San Diego city council
Chula vista city council
FROM: William E. Claycomb, president
SUBJECT: supervisor Roberts' Trouble With FACTS
We have studied Supervisor Roberts' Feb. 8, 2000, speech, his
fourth on the subject of fuel cells.
To date he has not mentioned photovoltaics to get the needed
hydrogen from water even though we have done so in papers
presented to you on five different dates. (May 11, June 3,
July 21, Sept. 14, all in 1999 and Feb. 8,2000).
on Feb. 8, supervisor Roberts severely criticized us for "
. Suggest(ing) things that are so far removed from reality
as - to. be unbelievable "If he's talking about our
suggestion that we should get the needed hydrogen from water
using electricity produced by photovoltaics, we note:
1 ) Michael Shames, utility Consumers Action Network in
his paper, "The coming Electric Shock". Oct. 28, 1999, seven
times [pages (p) 9, 15, 24, 27, 28, 42 and 44] mentions
"innovative new energy technologies" to produce electricity.
Twice he especially mentions photovoltaics.
2) The california
photovoltaic electricity
installed kilowatt.
Energy commission is subsidizing
production by paying up to $3,000 per
supervisor Roberts says:" if you wanna come here
tell us they" (fuel cell vehicles, we guess) "don I t exist
continue to do it." If you would all take the time to
the paper about fuel cells we gave you on May 11, 1999,
would see we mentioned that nine automobile companies
and
then
read
you
and
-2-
partnerships and others are working on fuel cell motors for
automobiles and other vehicles.
Supervisor Roberts said:" a fuel cell needs somethin'
' - - -
that serves as a as a a vehicle for extracting the hYdrogen
." Again if you would read the paper we just mentioned,
you would see that the best solution for extracting hYdrogen
is from water Using hYdrolysis. The paper also gives several
excellent reasons for not Using gaSoline including its greater
cost.
SUpervisor Roberts said on May 11,
and Texaco are partners and are
gasoline be the source of power for
1999:" Arco, Shell
clearly interested that uh
those fuel cells "
Roberts said (Feb. 8, 2000):" dbb. It's a partnership
with Daimler-Benz and Ballard" with-"a major plant in Carlsbad,
- - -" We have the business card of Rick COoper, P.E., copy
attached. It says the partnership also includes Ford and their
major plant is in Poway. They have nothing in Carlsbad.
We just don't know what to believe when Roberts tells us
Something.
-.- -
Finally, if you don't want to
mentioned above, try "Powering
Cell and the Race to Change the
by Tom Koppel, Published by John
read the seven page paper we
the Future: The Ballard Fuel
World". Oct., 1999, 276 pages,
7aZ.;2c14;~
.<
.
..... -...
.', ,,/' .~ ..l~ ''Y. \,".... . \.
.~, " .""'"
;' ~;:-_"';"t'.;,i;==-:'
. .;1
-O\!
~!
"tj"
a
i
~<-- s
.;::c.n~O
Cl~~~8
8~~~1
CN""""=
uO\QiCii'.a
-ecS~~-d
. ~t
~ ;~~
_ 0
N CL. 'C
.... .:.:
".
S
"'
~ Ci
0; II
.:~
x.i5
g 1J'
U";;:'o
'" .
u "
a:::!
l
5
11
~
~
..
;;
"
t
E-
~
..
.~
Cl
""
l
,~..
. 'j. -~",..."" ,~.......
409 Palm Ave., suite 100, Imperial Beach, CA 91932-1121 Tel: (619)429 7946
MEMORANDUM
February 8, 2000
~
, I know no IIl1fe lepOllitOfV of the ultilllllte powers of
the society but the people thelllselves, and
(_... we think the not enliqhtened enough .
exercise th it control with II
Jleaolllll discretion, the remedy is .
not to take it ~rolll th." but to inform their
discretion. I Thomllll Jefferson
septelllber 28, 1820
TO: Files
FROM: William E. Claycomb
SUBJECT: FOURTH SPEECH
Following our Reading of
a.m. Meeting on Feb. 8,
pf supervisors
by Ron
our Feb.
2000, of
Roberts
5, 2000,
the San
at his insistence
MEMORANDUM to 9: 00
Diego county Board
(on tape
campaign)
of all other efforts
See at 9-22-99
in Ron Roberts
Global warming
Madam
don't
sure
Chairman,
wanna get
he's
could I just respond for a minute (?) n an I
in a debate uh but for the gentleman an an I'm
sincere in doing his research.
I have been the company is dbb. It's a partnership with Daimler
(pronounced Damnler)-BenZ and Ballard. They have a major plant
in Carlsbad, the industrial park there. They are building fuel
cell vehicles including buses n other things. you will . have
an opportunity to see them someday an in fact we may bring a
demonstration model down so that perhaps this gentleman can
be better informed in his comments but this is not a figment
of my imagination. They are looking at different fuels that
these will run on. Even a fuel cell needs somethin' that serves
as a as a a vehicle for extracting the hydrogen and uh the work
is very far along.
At a State Board meeting about three weeks ago in Diamond Bar
uh they had a number of different vehicles on display for us.
These things do exist and with all due respect n I I appreciate
the effort you've done to get information, You need to work
a little bit harder and I would give you the company name.
They do exist in carlsbad n you I re going to see these
are gonna be new technologies that yoU 're gonna see rolling
on this the our own streets in the not too distant future.
(Claycomb tries to interject to say: poway not Carlsbad but
Jacobs and Roberts over ride and Roberts continues) I didn 't
ask for a debate. I I kindly listened to you and heard yOU
and I've heard yOU several times come down here and and uh speak
-2-
"
,
to this issue and uh an an suggest things that are so far
removed from reality as to be unbelievable an I've sat patiently
an I've taken that. Now you yoU've heard me and I've give yoU
the information and if you wanna come here and tell us they
don't exist then continue to do it.
Chairwoman Dianne Jacob: Mr. Claycomb, what I would suggest
that Supervisor Roberts has indicated he will provide you with
the information, the address of the business in Carlsbad an
you may wanna check it out n n to see what they have available
to them. We appreciate you being here today.
After listening to the next two speakers, I left. On the way
out, Roberts' aide, Anthony Orlando, J.D., Policy Advisor gave
me a copy (attached) of the business card of Rick Cooper, P.E.,
Managing Director dbb fuel cell engines Corp. 12190 Tech Center
Drive, Poway:, CA 92064 USA, Tel. (858) 513-4801 Fax (858) 679_
4901 E-mail: riccoo@sd.ballard.com _ A Daimler Chrysler/Ballard/
Ford Company.
-
NOTE: Roberts' Speech (this is his fourth one) took
-
43 sec. SOB I and other public cO~i:i;t~, r__s -b,reAiven
min. 60 sec. 7f~ V, eft
~(f?
-.-
r_-- --s¡:
'5~~'"
CllY OF
CHUrA VISfA
OFFICE OFTHE CITY ATTORNEY
Date: February 16, 2000
To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: John M. Kaheny, ' fL-
C~ty Attorney
Re: Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session
for the Meeting of 2/15/00
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista met in Closed session
on 2/15/00 to discuss:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING:
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(b)
Claim No. 99-15-006
One Case
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(c)
Two Cases
The city Attorney hereby reports to the best of his knowledge from
observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the City
Attorney participated, that there were no reportable actions which
are required under the Brown Act to be reported.
JMK: 19k
276 FOURTH AVENUE' CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910. (619) 691-5037' FAX (619) 409-5823
"""Ooo'"~'"'~""-'
.. -~-_..-
j'r ~ h '; "
January 7, 2000 ~ (.~.~-,- ',.
'¡ FEe," t1J1)
City of Chula Vista (:[i','ii;;:i~"fÍ ..;¡:~-,--,
276 4th Avenue 91910 ---.,1' . Vl.S.lj\.i~~_. :
Chula Vista, CA
Dear City ofChula Vista,
Enclosed please find my Prospective Sponsor Fonn for the 2000 Miss Teenage California
scholarship Pageant, April 7-9, 2000, As a delegate, I am most excited to represent our area in
the 21 st annual state event.
I am 16, and a junior at Bonita Vista High SchooL My educational goals are to attend Harvard
University, with the hopes of one day becoming a lawyer, I am an honor student, taking AP and
m classes, a prospective m Diploma candidate, have a 4,50 GPA, and a member of the Cross
Country and Track and Field teams.
I am sure you are ffequently asked to support important projects and causes. I hope you will
consider my request a priority. The Miss Teenage California Scholarship Pageant is the oldest
teen pageant for young women in the state, Contestants are judged in the areas of Activities and
Achievement, Personality, Poise & Appearance. Over $25,000 in college scholarships and prizes
will be awarded at the pageant. The pageant provides an environment for building confidence,
self-esteem, communication, social, and organizational skills for the young women of the state.
The sponsorship fee for participation is $550. The sponsorship fee pays for my hotel,
accommodations during my stay at the pageant, meals, and helps deffay the extensive costs of
producing the program, Any amount will be graciously appreciated.
It would be very helpful if I could receive a response ffom your office before April 22nd My
advertising deadline to the state pageant is March 4th,
I will be most appreciative of your consideration.
Sincerely,
~~
Dulce Alvarez
Miss Teen Border Cities
Ino Sauve,,;, p,.,..o~~ DM'. _L.," -~- -,.-- -- \,. .ponsorea I>van i"Æv;'¡...1\ ---' -,_. ,,-, ..
~
MISS TEENAGE CALIFORNIA
SCHOLARSHIP PAGEANT
IndependenUy produced by Denfranc Productions for 21 years
State Headquarters: llO46 Mollnero Court, Elk Grove, CA 95758
Telephone: 916-684-4225 Fax: 916-683-2442 Ema": Mlssteenca@ao/.com
Official Webslte: hftp:l/WWW.mlssteenageca/.fom/a.com
MISS TEENAGE CALIFORNIA SPONSOR FORM
Contestant~it1e: Miss Teen eovJer c i+1 es
NameOfCb.'ntestant:~\.l\C IJor€"Z ..
ContestanVs Address: -
City, State. Zip: ( 0
DEAR SP~NSOR:
DIe above named young lady has been selected to compete in the 21st Annual Miss Teenage California Scholarship Pageant. April ,-
9.2000 at the Westin Los Angeles Airport Hotel, Los Angeles, CA. The sponsorship fee for participation is $550.00. This fee covers
her shared.hotel accommodations, entry into the state competition. designated meals, and other program related expenses. In other
eveots of ljiis kind there is a separate fee for accommodations and meals. Our fee covers all the above.
y contribute any amount towards the sponsorship fee. AIL CRECKS ARE MADE PAYABLE TO THE ABOVE
N E ONCE SHE HAS COLLECTED ALL OF HER SPONSOR CHECKS, SHE IS TO MAKE ONE
CASHlE 'S CHECK PAYABLE TO DANFRANC PRODlICTIONS IN THE FULL AMOUNT.
SPONS~SHIP INFORMATION:
Sponsors Will have their name of business OB. individual name (if sponsored by an indivi<\ual) and city listed in a special section ot
the Souvenir Program Book, should sponsorship total $550.00. Please type or print the following information: (see imponant note
below) j
:"iame orjSponsor: Phone #
Address iof Sponsor:
City, State, Zip:
DlI'Ol\"fANT NOTE:
sponso~hiP paid totaling $550.00 sponsors fee will have their name of business OR individual name (if sponsored by an individual)
and ci listed in a special section of the "Souvenir Program Book". If a contestant has sponsorship totaling $595.00 she will be
entitled: 0 a one-fourth page advertisement in the pageant program book. If a contestant has sponsorship totaling 5695.00. she will be
elltitledlto a one-half page advertisement. A full-page advertisement can be purchased for 5795.00 sponsorship. All ads must be
camera ready.and typeset by a local printer. No exceptions. Please see cban below. (All sponsors must be mentioned in the display
ads.)
One-Fourth Page..........................................5595
One-Half Page.... ...... ....................................$695
Full Page... ............... .....................................$795
Inside Cover (front or back).........................$995 (inside ftontlback must be reserved)
Back COver..................................................$I,OOO (back cover must be reserved)
HYU~!jRTANT RF.M1NDER:
~ remember, that all checks must be made payable to the above-named contestant. Once all of her necessary funds have been
collec ed, she is required to submit one cashier's check/money order only for the full amount, payable to Danfranc Productions.
We II ank you for your &enerOU5 contribution. which will enable tbls outstanding YOUD& lady to compete for the title or Mis.'
Tee/l ge Clllifomill 2000. Over 515,000 In scholanhlps and prizes will be awarded at the MIss Teenage California Pageant.
Miss eenage Californla will also be selected by a distinguished panel of judges.
SPONSORSHIP FUNDS ARE NON-REFUNDABLE UNDER ANY AND ALL CmCUMST ANCES.
February 22, 2000
MEMO TO: The Honorable Mayor Shirley Horton
FROM: Armando Bueln~
SUBJECT: SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY - FEBRUARY 22,2000
Per your request, we have prepared a proclamation and certificates to be presented to
the members of the Hilltop High School Academic Decathlon Team for their victory of
the 17th Annual San Diego County Academic Decathlon.
cc: City Clerk
February 16, 2000
'l
(,,1
I
-------~~
MEMO TO: City Clerk".#
FROM: Patty Wesp f~p
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT - FEB 22, 2000
At the request of Mayor Horton, please placed the following under Mayor's
Report:
Ratification of Appointment to the Library Board
Tris Hubbard
Thank you.
cc: Mayor Horton
February 16, 2000
MEMO TO: City Clerk
FROM, Pany W"p ß #
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT - FEB 22, 2000
At the request of Mayor Horton, please placed the following under Mayor's
Report:
Ratification of Appointment to the Board of Ethics
Charles Bull
Thank you.
cc: Mayor Horton
HI ðllc'!>,e tin":,,' penalty of perjury that I .Ift
øn.,ilJ e" hi ;a """ "f C:lU!~ Vista In till
",,:1:0 (Ii ' "Ð '_it:; "oJu.;, ~nrl t:'3t I posted
t,,11 ;\, çn:~f.'~jLeúÌ1the Bulletin Baird .t
the f'U~~e~¡ces Bu;~Jin3 a~~~,
Tuesday, February 22, 2000 DATED, ¥~ SHiNED
- ouncIl Chambers
6:00 p.m. Public Services Building
(immediately following the City Council Meeting)
CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. Unless the City
Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will
discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are permitted by law to be the
subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in
closed session to best protect the interests of the City. The Council is required by law to return
to open session, issue any reports of final action taken in closed session, and the votes taken,
However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be
terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session,
reports offinal action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of
final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerks
Office,
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING SIGNIFICANT
EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.9(B)
A. One case
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A)
A. Fritsch v. City ofChula Vista, USDC, 98-CV-O972-E (CGA)
B. D'Ablaing Workers' Compensation Claim, CV980125
~y~
-1J-
-
CllY OF
CHUIA VISTA
MEMORANDUM
February 16, 2000
To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: David D. Rowlands, Jr., City Manage~
Subject: Council Meeting of February 22, 2000
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting
of Tuesday February 22, 2000. Comments regarding the Written Communications are
as follows:
1a. This is a letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge
from observance of actions taken in Closed Session on February 15, 2000, there
were no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported.
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS lETTER BE RECEIVED AND FilED.
1 b. This is a letter from Dulce Alvarez, a student at Bonita Vista High School,
requesting financial assistance towards her expenses to compete in the Miss
Teenage California Scholarship Pageant. This event does not meet the criteria
established in Council Policy 159-02, as it provides no "tangible benefit to the
City." THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS REQUEST BE
DENIED.
DDRmab
, :[t;~L\;\
January 7, 2000 ~! ¡_._-~_.. - -
I ¡ FEB'" lOOO
City of Chula Vista
276 4th Avenue 91910
Chula Vista, CA
Dear City of Chula Vista,
Enclosed please find my Prospective Sponsor Fonn for the 2000 Miss Teenage California
scholarship Pageant, April 7-9, 2000. As a delegate, I am most excited to represent our area in
the 21" annual state event,
I am 16, and a junior at Bonita Vista High School. My educational goals are to attend Harvard
University, with the hopes of one day becoming a lawyer. I am an honor student, taking AP and
IB classes, a prospective,IB Diploma candidate, have a 4.50 GPA, and a member of the Cross
Country and Track and Field teams,
I am sure you are fTequently asked to support important projects and causes, I hope you will
consider my request a priority, The Miss Teenage California Scholarship Pageant is the oldest
teen pageant for young women in the state. Contestants are judged in the areas of Activities and
Achievement, Personality, Poise & Appearance, Over $25,000 in college scholarships and prizes
will be awarded at the pageant. The pageant provides an environment for building confidence,
self-esteem, communication, social, and organizational skills for the young women of the state.
The sponsorship fee for participation is $550. The sponsorship fee pays for my hotel,
accommodations during my stay at the pageant, meals, and helps defTay the extensive costs of
producing the program. Any amount will be graciously appreciated.
It would be very helpful if I could receive a response fTom your office before April 22nd My
advertising deadline to the state pageant is March 4th
I will be most appreciative of your consideration.
Sincerely,
~~
Dulce Alvarez
Miss Teen Border Cities
/-13- /
~ ..
MISS TEENAGE CALIFORNIA
SCHOLARSHIP PAGEANT
Independently produced by Denfranc Productions for 21 years
Stat. Headquarters: 11046 Molinaro Court, Elk Grove, CA 95758
Telephone: 916-684-4225 Fax: 1116-683-2442 Emall: MIssteenca@ao/.com
Official Website: http://www.m/ssteenagecalifomla.com
MISS TEENAGE CALIFORNIA SPONSOR FORM
Cont~stant Title: Miss Teen ear dB rei -} \ {IS
NameofConte,s~tan: \lIe ez,
Contestant's Addre -
City. State, Zip:
DEAR SPONSOR:
The above named young lady has been selected to compete in the 21st Annual Miss Teenage California Scholarship Pageant. April 7-
9,2000 at the Westin Los Angeles Airport Hotel, Los Angeles, CA, The sponsorship fee for participation is $550.00. This fee covers
her shared hotel accommodations. entry into the state competition, designated meals. and other program related expenses. In other
events of this kind there is a separate fee for accommodations and meals. Our fee covers all the above.
Sponsors may contribute any amount towards the sponsorship fee. ALL CHECKS ARE MADE PAYABLE TO THE ABOVE
NAMED CONTESTANT. ONCE SHE HAS COLLECTED ALL OF HER SPONSOR CHECKS. SHE IS TO MAKE ONE
CASHIER'S CHECK PAYABLE TO DANFRANC PRODUCTIONS IN TIlE FULL AMOUNT.
SPONSORSHIP INFORMATION:
Sponsors will have their name of business OR individual name (if sponsored by an individ:ual) and city listed in a special section of
the Souvenir Program Book, should sponsorship total $550.00. Please type or print the following information: (see importantnole
below)
Name of Sponsor:
Address of Sponsor:
City, State. Zip:
I~\I'ORTANT NOTE:
Sponsorship paid totaling $550.00 sponsors fee will have their name of business OR individual name (if sponsored by an individual)
and city listed in a special section of the "Souvenir Program Book". If a contestant has sponsorship totaling $595.00 she will be
entitled to a one-fourth page advertisement in the pageant program book. If a contestant has sponsorship totaling $695.00, she will be
cntitled to a one-half page advertisement. A full-page advertisement can be purchased for 5795.00 sponsorship. All ads must be
camera ready.and typeset by a local printer. No exceptions. Please see chart below. (All sponsors must be mentioned in the display
ads.)
Phone #
One-Fourth Page......... .................................5595
One_HalfPage..............................................5695
Full Page.......................................................5795
Inside Cover (front or back).........................5995 (inside frontlback must be reserved)
Back COver..................................................51.Ooo (back cover must be reserved)
IMPORTANT REMINDER:
Please remember, that all checks must be made payable to the above-named contestant. Once all of her necessary funds have been
collected. she is required to submit one cashier's check/money order only for the full amount, payable to Danfranc Productions.
We thank you for your generous contributioo, which will enable this outstanding young lady to compete for the title of Mis.'
Tee/lage Califorllia 2000. Over 525,000 In scholarships and prizes will be awarded at the MIss Teenage California Pageant.
Miss Teenage CaUfornla will also be selected by a dlstlngulshed panel of judges.
SPONSORSIDP FUNDS ARE NON-REFUNDABLE UNDER ANY AND ALL CIRCUMSTANCES.
j-/:3-C)-
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCJL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ADOPTING AN AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE EASTLAKE COMPANY,
LLC FOR EASTLAKE III (TRAILS, WOODS VISTAS, BUSINESS
EXPANSION, OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER AND LAND SWAP)
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the areas of land which are the subject of this Ordinance are
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A of the Amended and Restated
Development Agreement; and for the purpose of General description herein consist
of: a) 108,8 acres located north of Olympic Parkway between the future SR-125
fteeway alignment and the existing EastLake Greens development boundaries
(Southern "Land Swap" parcel); b) 24,7 acres located on the south side ofOtay Lakes
Road west of the future SR-125 fteeway (Northern "Land Swap" parcel); 3) 322.2
acres located east of Hunte Parkway between Otay Lakes Road and Olympic
Parkway (EastLake Trails); 4)108 acres located on the north side ofOtay Lakes Road
between Lane Avenue and Hunte Parkway (EastLake Business Center Phase II); and
5) 950 acres east of Hunte Parkway known as EastLake III GDP (Woods, Vistas
neighborhoods and Olympic Training Center) ("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on December 18, 1999, The EastLake Company, LLC ("Developer")
filed an application requesting an extension and restatement of the EastLake III
Development Agreement originally approved in April 1990 ("Project"); and,
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, The EastLake III Development Agreement was previously approved by
City Council on April February 27, 1990 Ordinance No. 2356; and,
WHEREAS, the EastLake III General Development Plan was previously approved by
City Council Resolution No, 15413; EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA)
plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15199 ("EastLake Greens
(SPA) plan") and Planned Community District Regulations previously approved by
City Council Ordinance No, 2317 (EastLake II-EastLake I Expansion-Planned
Community District Regulations) on July 18,1989.
D, Planning Commission Record on Applications
;;. - \
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said
project on January 26, 2000, and voted to recommend that the City Council approve
the extension and restated EastLake III Development Agreement; and,
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at
their public hearing on this Project held on January 26, 2000, and the minutes and
resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this
proceeding,
E, City Council Record on Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City
Council of the City ofChula Vista on February 1,2000 on the Project, and to receive
the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with
regard to same; and,
II NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, detennine and ordain as
follows:
A. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The Environmental Review Coordinator has detennined that the amended and
restated development agreement between the City ofChula Vista and the EastLake
Company, LLc. for the EastLake III is not a project as defined by the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15378).
B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY GENERAL PLAN
The City Council has detennined that the Development agreement as proposed to be
amended and restated, is consistent with the City=s General Plan, all applicable
mandatory and optional elements of the General Development plan for EastLake III
as well as all other applicable policies and regulations of the city in that the
Development Agreement would vest the right ofthe Developer to develop the subject
property in a manner consistent with the regulations found in those documents; and,
C, APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
In accordance with Section 65867,5 of the Govemment Code, the City Council ofthe
city ofChula Vista hereby approves the document entitled Amended and Restated
Development Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and the EastLake
Company, LLC for EastLake III (Trails, woods, Vistas, Business Center Expansion,
Olympic Training Site and Land Swap Parcels),
III. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
The Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
d- :L
IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption.
V RECORDATJON OF DOCUMENT
The City Clerk is hereby directed to record the Amended and Restated Development
Agreement in the office of the County Recorder.
Presented by Approved as to fonTI by
(À. ~~ ~
Robert A. Leiter John Kaheny
Director of Planning City Attorney
(H:\home\plannìnglluis\pcm-OO 16,ord)
d,-3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
,;¡
Item ",'
Meeting Date ~
'2./'2. -z/oo
ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving the sixth amendment to the agreement
between the City of Chula Vista and Rick Engineering Company for
preliminary engineering design services for three interchanges with Jnterstate
805 at Telegraph Canyon Road, Olympic Parkway and Palomar Street;
waiving the consultant selection process and authorizing the Mayor to
execute said amendment in behalf of the City; and appropriating $73,700 in
T=",ort"io, D"'I"Pm~1 F,æ <0 Projoc< No, 24093270
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works
REVIEWED BY: Gr
City Manager t'iv'í'" (4/Sths Vote: YesX No--'>
On January 23,1996, Council by Resolution No, 18193 approved a contract with Rick Engineering
for preJiminary engineering design services for three interchanges on Interstate 805 at Telegraph
Canyon Road, Olympic Parkway, and Palomar Street. Since then, due to additional work
requirements by Caltrans, five amendments to this contract have been made. These amendments
were approved by Council on January 21, 1997 (Resolution 18555) and May 20,1997 (Resolution
No. 18670) and August 5,1997 (Resolution 18749) and November 17,1998 (Resolution 19269) and
July 13, 1999 (Resolution No, 19540). This sixth amendment to the contract will provide for the
final Design of Olympic Parkway, between Oleander and Brandywine, The Design includes
preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E), modification of the existing Project Study
report (PSR), Project Report (PR) and environmental documents for said segment of Olympic
Parkway and allow for reimbursable expenses incurred in the completion ofthis work.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve a resolution approving the sixth amendment to the
agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Rick Engineering Company for preliminary
engineering design services for three interchanges with Interstate 805 at Telegraph Canyon Road,
Olympic Parkway and Palomar Street; waiving the consultant selection process and authorizing the
Mayor to execute said amendment in behalf of the City; and appropriating $73,700 in Transportation
Development Impact Fees to Project No. 24093270
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not appJicable,
DISCUSSION:
In late 1995, after a thorough selection process, staff recommended that Rick Engineering Company
be awarded a contract for engineering services for three interchanges with Interstate 805 at Telegraph
Canyon Road, Olympic Parkway and Palomar Street. The agreement with Rick Engineering
Company was approved on January 23, 1996, by Council Resolution No, 18193, Since then, Rick
Engineering has worked diligently to design and process the project with all the agencies involved
(local, State, and Federal). During this period, five amendments to the contract have been made due
to modifications, delays and changes by Caltrans encountered throughout the planning and design
phases of the three interchanges. The first two amendments were approved by Council Resolution
Page 2, Item 3
Meeting Date 2M/OO
d~
Nos. 18555 and 18670 increasing the original contact cost of $502,070 to $648,390. The third
amendment to the contract was necessary to have Rick Engineering prepare a Noise Barrier Scope
Summary Report in connection with an opportunity to obtain State funding trom their retrofit
soundwall program along fteeways, This amendment authorized $6,000 for preparation of the Noise
barrier report. The City's application for State Soundwall Retrofit funding was successful in the
amount of $1.14 million, These funds will be used to offset part of the construction cost of the
Olympic Parkway Interchange,
The fourth and fifth amendments to the contract covered additional follow-up work required by
Caltrans, affecting all three interchanges, and are described in more detail on Exhibits I and 2
(attached).
The proposed sixth amendment to the Rick Engineering contract provides for the completion of the
Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the Olympic Parkway street segment between
Oleander and Brandywine. Rick Engineering had initiated said PS&E for Sunbow and we felt that
it would be more efficient if they completed the work. Following the completion of the PS&E, we
will explore the possibility of including the construction work of the subject segment with the
construction contract for Olympic Parkway east of Brandywine. The environmental work for the
subject street segment is scheduled to be compJeted with the Interchange project and is cUITently
being done under the Rick Engineering contract. Our goal is to speed up the completion of the
PS&E and award the project in time to coincide with the construction of improvements within the
larger Olympic Parkway project east of Brandywine.
As in the case ofthe previous amendments, Rick Engineering Company proposes to accomplish this
additional scope of work at what we believe is a reasonable price, Rick Engineering is being
proposed to do the design for this work without a new competitive consultant seJection process
because they possess extensive cumulative knowledge of the project planning and design essential
for the successful completion of this project. Accordingly, staff is recommending that the City
Council waive the consultant selection process of Municipal Code Section 2.56.070 because of the
substantial design work already perfonned by Rick Engineering on the project, which makes the
selection impractical and potentially detrimental to the project in light of the need for coordinated
design drawings,
The proposed amendment provides for the reimbursement of up to $6,400 in expenses incUITed by
Rick Engineering in the perfonnance of the additional work. These expenses include the cost of
making blueprints and copies of various reports, which, due to Caltrans' review has been much more
voluminous than originally anticipated. The reimbursable expenses are a budget item for all three
phases (projects) included in the contract.
Once the work proposed under this amendment is completed, the preparation of the PS&E would
begin. As indicated in the original RFP, assuming Rick Engineering continues to provide the
quality, cost effective work that has marked their perfonnance to date, staff anticipates negotiating
a further amendment or separate contract to prepare the PS&E, Rick's perfonnance and extensive
cumulative knowledge of the project will be valuable in quickly completing this critical element of
our transportation system. Further construction management assistance will probably also be needed
when this project moves into the construction phase,
--,
Page 3, Item ~
Meeting Date 2 M/OO
,7d.
FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed sixth amendment will increase the contract with Rick
Engineering, as amended, by $73,700 to a total of$I,257,840. All of the costs associated with this
amendment, as wen as the amended contract, wiJI be funded from TransDIF fees. There are
sufficient funds in the TransDIF fund to cover the proposed increase. City staffwiJI be involved in
oversight, coordination and direction. The TransDIF will also pay staff costs.
EXHIBITS: 1, Background on Amendments 1 through 5
2, Table of Contract fees for each amendment
H:IHOMEIENGlNEERIAGENDAI6RICKaI13rev,smn,doc
File No, 0735-IO-STM327
-¡I.:;¡;
,~,)
Exhibit 1
Background on Amendments 1 through 5
Because additional work beyond the original scope of services is again being required, staff reviewed
the previous contract and amendments, along with the overview of each of the projects to make sure
that we are progressing in an orderly, cost effective manner and according to a master plan. The
history of the previous amendments relating to the individuaJ projects will be discussed beJow:
Telegraph Canvon Road
The original contract required Rick Engineering to do preJiminary geometries, and assess the need,
for a combined Caltrans Project Study ReportlProject Report (pSR/PR); after initiating work on the
project, Caltrans committed that they would allow the City to do the work under a pennit, which
eliminated the need to go through the PSR/PR phase. However, at the same time, CaJtrans required
the City to do work beyond that initially anticipated and included in the scope of Rick Engineering's
contract. This work included additional lane widening under the overpass and northbound off-ramp
widening. The first amendment, which was a no net cost increase amendment, transferred funds that
were included in the contract for the PSR/PR phase to the PS&E phase for the additional design
work. This additional work included related geotechnical and environmental studies as well as
actual design work.
The second amendment to Rick Engineering's contract involved accomplishing additional work
which resulted in an increase of$145,270, bringing the new contract total to $648,390. Thechanges
in the Fourth Amendment to the contract allowed Rick Engineering to perfonn office caJculations,
field staking, and assist staff in the bidding and inspection processes. The Fifth Amendment did not
include any additional items pertaining to the Telegraph Canyon Interchange. Also, the proposed
sixth amendment does not include any additional items pertaining to the Telegraph Canyon
Interchange, which has already entered the construction phase.
Palomar Street
This project invoJves the provision of a new access to 1-805 by widening the existing East Palomar
Street overpass and providing a partial interchange with ramp connections to and ITom the north. As
originally envisioned, this project includes a minor bridge widening, installation of new ramps,
intersection widening and the installation of traffic signals.
The work under Rick Engineering's contract involves the preparation of Access Approval Request
(AAR) document addressing interchange spacing for submittal to Caltrans and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHW A). The purpose of the AAR is to provide an initial screening of new
interchange projects, allowing for FHW A to provide conceptual approval prior to the approval of a
PSR by Caltrans. Rick's contract also provided for preparation of a PSR upon completion of the
AAR, with much of the infonnation in the AAR being directly incorporated into the PSR. The
contract further provided for preparation of a Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR)
that documents a preliminary environmental screening of potential issues. The PEAR will provide a
recommendation on the type of environmental clearance required by the project and the scope of
additional studies that will be required at subsequent stages (PR and Environmental Documentation).
The proposed sixth amendment does not incJude any additional items pertaining to the PaJomar
Street Interchange. However, a future amendment could be necessary because Caltrans has indicated
Exhibit 1
Page 2
that a full diamond interchange, which is one of the study alternatives, may be required in order to
approve this additional access point to I-80S.
Olvrnpic Parkwav
The original contract required Rick Engineering to prepare a combined PSR/PR for the Orange
A venue (Olympic Parkway)/I-805 Interchange. The project included bridge widening or installation
of a new parallel structure, ramp widening, intersection widening, and the installation of traffic
signals. The first amendment to Rick Engineering's contract only extended the completion date for
the work related to this particular project. Neither the first nor second amendments made any other
changes to the scope of work for the Olympic Parkway interchange. While Caltrans was nearly
ready to approve the PSR for the Interchange, in September 1998, after they learned we intended to
add the segment between Oleander and Brandywine to the overall interchange construction project,
they required the PSR to be revised to include the additional work.
The fourth amendment approved the separation of the original PSR/PR into two phases for a separate
PSR and PR, and added Olympic Parkway between Oleander and Brandywine to the PSR in order to
complete this phase of the project. The fourth amendment also completed the Project Report
according to Caltrans' requirements. As in the case of Telegraph Canyon Road, Rick Engineering
proposed to accomplish this additional work at what we believed was a reasonable price because
they possess extensive cumulative knowledge of the project planning and design essential for the
successful completion ofthis project. The total cost for all work under the fourth amendment related
to Olympic Parkway project was $208,200.
The Fifth Amendment was solely related to the Olympic Parkway/I-805 Interchange Project and was
the result of traffic issues on Interstate 805 and the Otay Valley Road southbound off-ramp. These
traffic issues are related to events that are held at the Coors Amphitheater. Caltrans required that the
Olympic Parkway/I-805 Interchange Project include improvements to mitigate traffic backup onto
the freeway caused by Amphitheater events. As evident by the traffic backup and delays on the ]-
805 freeway coincident with Amphitheater events, Caltrans required the issue to be evaluated as part
of this project. This Fifth Amendment will accomplish the addition of anticipated improvements to
the nearly approved Project Study Report, and incorporate the appropriate improvements into the
Project Report and environmental studies recently started. The Project Report and Environmental
Document approved with the fourth amendment was modified by this Fifth Amendment to include
additional engineering and environmental documentation expanding project features. The work
inc]uded metric topographic mapping; additional environmental documentation including noise,
biologica], archaeological, cultural, traffic, geotechnical, lead testing, air quality and visual
quality/land fonn elements, completing the actual PR and additional reimbursables, The additional
total cost for the Fifth Amendment was $174,700.00.
Fondin!! Backl!roond:
City staff was able to obtain approximately $11.14 million in state and federal funding for this
project. First, the City has received approval for $] .14 million in State Soundwall Retrofit funding.
Second, Congressman Bob FiJner was instrumenta] in assisting the City to obtain $5.0 million in
Federal Demonstration Project funding under the new Federal "Transportation Equity Act for the
21st Century" (TEA-21) program for an access road to the Olympic Training Center (OTe).
Exhibit 1
Page 3
Olympic Parkway from 1-805 to the OTC was identified as the project. Due to the need to get the
first phase from Hunte Parkway to the OTC compJeted as soon as possible and the delay which
wouJd be created by the need to follow Federa1 procedures, Congressman Filner authorized the City
to use this funding for the Olympic Parkway 1-805 interchange project. The third outside funding
source is also undertheTEA-21Iaw. Another category underTEA-21 is the Surface Transportation
Program (STP), which provides additional resources for agencies to solve transportation problems in
the local area. City staff submitted an application to SANDAG, which is the body that apportions
STP funds in this local area, and was successful in obtaining $5.0 million in STP funding for
Olympic Parkway interchange with 1-805. The Olympic Parkway between Oleander and
Brandywine segment was originally added to the interchange improvements to assure the full
utilization of federal funds.
However, we recently learned from SANDAG staff that STP funding already programmed for our
region could be lost ifnot obligated very quickly. They indicated that a "use it or lose it" policy is
being fonnuJated in Sacramento regarding the timely use of federal funds for local projects. The
State is not pleased with the fact that only 3% of the regional arterial federal funds have been
obligated in our region so far. Construction on the interchange project is currently scheduled to
commence in October of2001. Therefore, we will be unable to have the STP funds fully obligated
before the summer of 2001. On December 9,1999, the SANDAG Cities/County Transportation
Advisory Committee (CT AC), based on our request, approved the shifting of $5 million in this
region's STP funds from the I-805/Olympic Parkway Interchange Project to the Chula Vista Fiscal
Year 2000-2001 Pavement Rehabilitation Program, and replacing it with TransNet funds. On
January 11,2000, the City Council approved a resolution committing the City to spend $5 million in
TransNet funds on the interchange project during fiscal years 2001, 01-02, and 02-03.
The Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) as approved by the City Council on
April 13, 1999, includes $8 million in Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) funds that are
programmed to finance the Pavement Rehabilitation Program over the next three fiscal years. The
shifting of the $5 million in STP funds from the interchange project to the FY 00-01 Pavement
Rehabilitation Program will require an RTIP amendment by reprogramming the $5 million in
TransNet funds (currently programmed for pavement rehabilitation) for the interchange project over
FY 00-01, FY 01-02 and FY 02-03. Construction on the interchange project will continue through
FY 02-03 and is currently scheduled to be completed in April of 2003. The shifting of funds
described above reduces the federal contribution by $5 million and makes it unnecessary to keep said
street segment a part of the interchange project. Said segment can instead be added to the larger
Olympic Parkway project in order to assure earlier completion.
HIIHOME\ENGINEERIAGENDA\6RICK EXHIBIT,smn,doc
File No, 0735-10-STM327
Exhibit 2
First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth
Original Amendment Amendment Amendment Amendment Amendment Amendment
Phase Geueral Description of Contract Revised Revised Revised Revised Revised Revised
No. Work for Esch Phase Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts
Geometries and Cost
Estimate for Telegraph
I Canyon Road $20,150 $20,150 $20,150 $20,150 $20,150 $20,150 $20,150
Project Study
Report/Project Report
(PSRlPR) for Telegraph
Canyon Road (Original
ConlTact) Encroachment
Permit for Telegraph
Canyon Road (First
2 Amendment) $92,960 $74,080 $80,853 $80,853 $80,853 $80,853 $80,853
Plans Specifications and
Estimates (PS&E) fof $157,630
3 Telegraph Canyon Road $138,750 $291,127 $291,127 $291,127 $291,127 $291,127
Access Appfoval Report
4 (AAR) for East Palomar $50,400 $50,400 $50,400 $50,400 $50,400 $50,400 $50,400
Project Study Report
(PSR) for East Palomar
5 SlTeet $78,960 $78,960 $78,960 $78.960 $86,310 $86,310 $86,310
Pfoject Study
Report/Project Report
(PSRlPR) for Olympic
6 Parkway $104,720 $104,720 $104,720 $104.720 $191,820 $224,330 $228,430
7 Expenses $17,180 $17,180 $22,180 $22,180 $32,t80 $40,820 $47,220
Submittal of request fOf
soundwal1 program
8 funding 0 0 0 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000
9 Construction staking,
support and inspection
and overhead sign design
for Telegraph Canyon
Road 0 0 0 0 $129,500 $129,500 $129,500
10 Environmental
Document and Metric
Topographic Mapping
for Olympic Parkway 0 0 0 0 $121.100 $254,650 $254,650
11 Preparation of PS&E fof
Olympic Parkway
between Oleander and
Brandywine 0 0 0 0 0 0 $63,200
Total Cost $503,120 $503,120 $648,390 $654,390 $1,009,440 $1,184,140 $1,257,840
H: IHO MEIEN GINEERIAD VPLAN\R] CK6, TBL
-:tJ3
RESOLUTION NO. -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO
THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY FOR PRELIMINARY
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THREE
INTERCHANGES WITH INTERSTATE 805 AT TELEGRAPH
CANYON ROAD, OLYMPIC PARKWAY AND PALOMAR
STREET; WAIVING THE CONSULTANT SELECTION
PROCESS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE
SAID AMENDMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND
APPROPRIATING $73,700 IN TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES TO PROJECT NO.
24093270
WHEREAS, on January 23, 1996, Council by Resolution No.
l8l93, approved a contract with Rick Engineering for preliminary
engineering design services for three interchanges on Interstate
805 at Telegraph Canyon Road, Olympic Parkway, and Palomar Street;
and
WHEREAS, since then, due to additional work requirements
by Caltrans, five amendments to this contract have been made; and
WHEREAS, these amendments were approved by Council on
January 21, 1997 (Resolution 18555) and May 20, 1997 (Resolution
No. 18670) and August 5, 1997 (Resolution 18749) and November
17,1998 (Resolution 19269) and July 13, 1999 (Resolution No.
19540); and
WHEREAS, this sixth amendment to the contract will
provide for the final Design of Olympic Parkway, between Oleander
and Brandywine and includes preparation of Plans, Specifications
and Estimate (PS&E) , modification of the existing Project Study
report (PSR), Project Report (PR) and environmental documents for
said segment of Olympic Parkway and allow for reimbursable expenses
incurred in the completion of this work.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista hereby waives the consultant selection
process of Municipal Code Section 2.56.070 because of the
substantial design work already performed by Rick Engineering on
the proj ect which makes the selection process impractical and
potentially detrimental to the project in light of the need for
coordinated design drawings.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the city
of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Sixth Amendment to the
Agreement between the City of Chula vista and Rick Engineering
1
Company for preliminary engineering design services for three
interchanges with Interstate 805 at Telegraph Canyon Road, Olympic
Parkway and Palomar Street, a copy of which is on file in the
office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby
authorized to execute said amendment on behalf of the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $73,700 is hereby
appropriated in Transportation Development Impact Fees to Project
No. 24093270.
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
H, \home\lorraine\rs\rick, 6th
2
vY3
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN, ENVIRONMENTAL
AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION/ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
FOR THREE INTERCHANGES WITH ]-805 AT
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD, OLYMPIC P ARKW A Y AND PALOMAR STREET
THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PRELJMINARY DES]GN,
ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION/ ADMINISTRATION SERVICES is entered
into as of February 22, 2000, by and between the City of Chula Vista (CITY) a municipal chartered
corporation ofthe State of California, and Rick Engineering Company (CONSULTANT), whose place of
business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 6.
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the City ofChula Vista has approved an Agreement with Rick Engineering Company
dated January 23,1996 and approved by Resolution 18193 (Agreement); and
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has approved five amendments to said Agreement dated
January 21,1997, May 20,1997; August 5,1997; November 17,1998; and July 13, 1999; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is required to do additional work not anticipated in the original
Agreement and amendments thereto; and
WHEREAS, CITY requires the completion of the contract in order to complete needed
improvements to the interchanges at Telegraph Canyon Road, Olympic Parkway and Palomar Street to
provide necessary infTastructures to meet future threshold standards; and
WHEREAS, both CITY and CONSULTANT desire to further amend the Agreement approved by
Resolution 18193 to revise the scope of work to include additional items required by CalTrans,
WHEREAS, City Staff cannot perfonn the work outlined above due to lack of available stafftime
and/or lack of expertise to efficiently deal with the State and Federal requirements and processes.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
A. Amend Exhibit A, Section 8A, by expanding the Detailed Scope of Work as set forth in the original
Agreement and amendments thereto, as follows:
Additional Scope of Work:
I. Additional Project Description
A. Complete plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for use by the City of Chula Vist¡¡ to
construct Olympic Parkway improvements from Oleander Avenue to Brandywine, The basis for
this work will be the geometry and partially completed plans started by the Sunbow
-1-
8. Revise environmental scope of work for interchange to separate Olympic Parkway from
Oleander to Brandywine into stand alone technical studies,
C. Update Project Study Report (PSR) pursuant to Caltrans direction to take Olympic Parkway from
Oleander to Brandywine out of the interchange project.
II. Additional Proiect Scope of Work
A. PS&E
I. Improvement Plans - Update and complete improvement plan drawings, including title sheet,
cross-sections, plan and profiles, and details. Update will include coordination of matching
improvements to current projects east and west of the project limits. Plans will also be
updated to incorporate appropriate plan review comments made by City reviewers.
2. Grading Plans - Update and complete grading and drainage plan drawings to coincide with
proposed street improvements described above.
3. Drainage Study - Update and complete project drainage study to support proposed drainage
improvements,
4, Right-of-way DrawinglLegals - Update and revise right-of-way documentation for temporary
and permanent impacts for use by City ofChula Vista in their acquisition of the necessary
project right-of-way, City will provide updated title reports for affected parcels.
5. Retaining Wall Plans/Sound Wall Plans - Prepare retaining wall and sound wall plans for
construction of walls proposed on northern side of Olympic Parkway to reduce right-of-way
impacts and to mitigate noise as identified by environmental technical studies.
6. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) - Prepare erosion control plans and SWPPP
to comply with NPDES permitting requirements. In compliance with regional permits, This
includes not only forms, guidelines, and instructions, but also drawings depicting drainage
patterns, temporary sediment control measures, temporary pollution control measures,
construction site limits, phasing, permanent erosion control measures and best management
practices,
7, Traffic Control- Prepare construction traffic control/stage construction drawings for work at
tie-ins at the intersections of both Oleander and Brandywine. It is assumed that the City will
allow closure of the section of Olympic Parkway during construction.
8. Utility Coordination - Provide information and input to City utility coordinator regarding
necessary utility company coordination.
9. Specifications and Estimates - Prepare technical special provisions and engineer's estimate
for use by City in preparation of contract documents.
10. Striping, Signing, Traffic Signals - Update signing and striping plans to match current
conditions to the east. Prepare traffic signal plan for the intersection of Oleander/Olympic
-2-
Parkway. Brandywine/Olympic Parkway is covered by the adjoining project immediate]y
east.
II, Prepare landscape and irrigation plans for medians, parkways, and slopes from Oleander to
Brandywine in conformance with corridor planning documents and themes.
]2. Reimbursables - Cost for reimbursable expenses such as printing, bluelines, and deliveries
will be billed to the City at the cost incurred by Rick Engineering Company. Budgets are set
up approximating the expenses for the additional project scope.
B. Environmental
1. Break out and complete separate, stand-alone technical documents on Olympic Parkway for
noise, air quality, cultural resources, and visual resources. These technical documents will
then be used by the consultant for the preparation of the appropriate environmental clearance
document for Olympic Parkway from Oleander to Brandywine. Said document shall include
CEQA Initial Study and if appropriate a Mitigated Negative Declaration or other such
document in accordance with the requirements ofCEQA.
2. Modify Historic Architectural Survey to comply with the Caltrans requirements, based upon
the age of homes in the project limits for the remaining interchange project.
C. Project Study Report (PSR) Update
1. Update text, project limits, funding allocations, and tables to reflect the removal of Olympic
Parkway from the interchange. Update geometric exhibits to remove Olympic Parkway.
Update right-of-way requirement data sheets, and project summary estimates for the
interchange to reflect the removal of Olympic Parkway from the interchange project.
III. Assumptions/Limitations
1. The City will conduct the bid, advertise, and award process,
2. The City will perform all appraisal and right-of-way acquisition work, along with any necessary
utility company coordination for relocations.
3. The environmental technical studies will be those provided by consultant for the existing
contract, and the City will utilize results of said reports to prepare a separate environmental
document for Olympic Parkway from that of the adjacent interchange.
4, Geotechnical Evaluations, paving section design, and grading requirements will be utilized from
the Geotechnical studies prepared by Geocon for Sunbow, and the Geotechnical Design Report
(GDR) prepared for the existing contract.
-3-
IV. Cost Summary
A. PS&E
1. Improvement Plans $ 15,000.00
2, Grading Plans $ 4,500.00
3. Drainage Study $ 4,500.00
4, Right-of-way Drawing $ 2,500.00
5. Retaining Wall Plans/Sound Wall Plans $ 7,000.00
6. SWPPP/Erosion Control $ 5,000.00
7. Traffic Control $ 5,000.00
8. Utility Coordination $ 1,000.00
9. Specifications/Estimates $ 5,000,00
10. Striping, Signing, Traffic Signals $ 7,000.00
11. Landscape and Irrigation Plans $ 23,200,00
12, Reimbursable Expense Budget $ 6.400,00
Subtotal $ 85,900.00
B. Environmental
1. Technical Studies, CEQA Compliance Documents $ 16,000.00
2. Reduced Historical Surveys $(33,000,00)
3. Environmental Document Expenses (Printing) $ 500.00
Subtotal $(16,500.00)
C. Project Study Report (PSR)
1. Update PSR $ 4.100.00
Subtotal $ 4,100.00
Total $ 73,700.00
-4-
The proposed amendment will increase the contract with the CONSULTANT, as amended, by $73,700 to a
total of$1,257,840,
.!!, Amend Exhibit A, Section liB Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement as follows:
1. Revise the Table as follows:
Fint Socond Third Foorth Fifth Sixth
Originsl Amendment Amendment Amendment Amendment Amendment Ameodmeot
Phase General Deseriptinn of Contract Revised Revised Revised Revised Revised Revised
No. Work for Eaeh Phase Amounts Amounts Amnunts Amnunts Amnnnts Amounts Amonnts
Geometries snd Cost
Estimate fOf Te]egraph $20.]50
I Canyon Road $20,150 $20,]50 $20,]50 $20,150 $20,]50 $20,]50
Pr')iect Study
ReportJPmject Report
(PSRlPR) fOf Te]egraph
Canyon Road (Original
Contract) Encroachment
Pennit for Telegraph
Canyon Road (First
2 Amendment) $92,960 $74,080 $80,853 $80,853 $80,853 $80,853 $80,853
Plans Specifications and
Estimates (PS&E) for $157,630
) Te]egraph Canyon Road $138,750 $291,127 $291,127 $291,127 $291,127 $291,127
Access Appmval Report
4 (AAR) for East Palomar $50,400 $50,400 $50,400 $50,400 $50,400 $50,400 $50,400
Project Study Report
(PSR) for East Palomar
5 Street $78,960 $78,960 $78,960 $78,960 $86,310 $86,310 $86,310
Project Study
ReportlProject Report
(PSRlPR) for Olympic
6 Parkway $104,720 $104,720 $104,720 $104,720 $]91,820 $224,330 $228,430
7 Expenses $17,180 $17,180 $22,180 $22,180 $32,180 $40,820 $47,220
Submittal of request for
soundwall pmgram
8 funding 0 0 0 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000
9 Construction staking,
support and inspection
and overhead sign design
fOf Te]egraph Canyon
Road 0 0 0 0 $129,500 $129,500 $129,500
10 Environmenta]
Document and Metric
Topographic Mapping
for Olympic Parkway 0 0 0 0 $121,100 $254,650 $254,650
11 Prepamtion ofPS&E for
Olympic Parkway
between Oleander and
Brandywine 0 0 0 0 0 0 $63,200
Tota] Cost $503,120 $503,120 $648,390 $654,390 $1,009,440 $1,184,140 $1,257,840
-5-
Services (excluding reimbursables) will be paid on a phased fixed fee arrangement in accordance with the
Cost Summary outlined in Section V of Exhibit A, Section 8.A.
C. Except as modified herein, all other provisions of the Agreement approved by Resolution No.
18-193 on January 23, 1996, the first amendment approved by Resolution No. 18555 on January
21,1997, the second amendment approved by Resolution No. 18670 on May 2O, 1997, the third
amendment approved by Resolution No. 18749 on August 5, 1997, the fourth amendment
approved by Resolution No. 19269 on November 17, 1998, and the fifth amendment approved
by Resolution No. 19540 on July 13, 1999, shall remain in full force and effect.
END OF SIXTH AMENDMENT
SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS
-6-
Signature Page
for the Sixth Amendment to
Agreement between City ofChula Vista
and Rick Engineering Company
for Preliminary Engineering Design, Environmental
and Construction Inspection! Administration Services
for Three Interchanges with 1-805 at Telegraph Canyon Road,
Olympic Parkway and Palomar Street
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONSULTANT have executed this sixth Amendment
thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete
consent to its tenns:
DATED: CITY OF CHULA VISTA
By:
Shirley Horton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
§'w
DATED. Rick Engineering Company
By: øK-
Kai Ramer, Associate
H: IS HARED\EN G INEER \RI CK6A M D, smn, DOC
-7-
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM L\
MEETING DATE Februarv 22. 2000
ITEM TITLE: Resolution 1) Accepting $74,595 of High Intensity Drug Trafficking
Area (HIDTA) Grant funds for administrative costs associated with the
California Border Alliance Group (CBAG); and 2) amending the Fiscal
Year 00-01 budget by appropriating the unanticipated grant revenues
and approving 1 additional position in the Police Department
SUBMITTED BY: Chief of police(r'~.J'V
REVIEWED BY: City Manage.tE~QcV' (4/5th Vote: Yes X No~
{~ \ On September 5, 1995, the City Council approved the City ofChula Vista to act as the "fiscal agent"
for the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) and to act as conduit to hire support personnel and
acquire necessary supplies and services. The mission ofCBAG is to develop multi-jurisdictional,
cooperative strategies to:
v" Gather intelligence on drug traffickers
v" Investigate drug trafficking activities
v" Arrest persons involved in illegal drug trafficking activities
v" Prosecute those arrested
CBAG receives an annual allocation of HIDTA funds each fiscal year ITom which the City is
reimbursed. The City also receives 2% of those costs for administration of the Grant.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution accepting the $74,595 in HIDTA
Grant funds for administrative costs associated with the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG)
and amend the Fiscal Year 00-01 budget by appropriating the unanticipated grant revenues and
approving I additional FTE position in the Police Department.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION: The following has been requested by the Chair of the CBAG, in cooperation with
the Director of the Southwest Border HJDTA. The recommendation is based on a need for network
administration and support of the Southwest Border HIDTA office and the Narcotic Information
Network, as well as the desire to improve interagency connectivity within the California Border
Alliance Group and along the entire southwest border.
I
J'
ITEM ~i
MEETING DATE Februarv 22. 2000
Staff recommends adding one (1) Network Administrator (Salary $60,000, benefits commensurate
with Confidential classification) to be assigned to both the Southwest Border HIDTA and the San
Diego/Imperial County Narcotic Information Network.
Specific duties and areas ofresponsibility assigned to this position include:
Network Administration
./ Workstation management/maintenance
./ Routine Hardware/Software upgrades
./ User management
./ InternaJ and external messaging management (Exchange/Outlook & GroupWise)
./ Backup data and restoration
./ Maintain antivirus protection
./ Intranet Web Development and Administration
./ Remote site dial up management - maintaining remote e-mail connectivity
./ Network security functions and policy
./ Research and recommend hardware/software purchases
./ ADNET onsite admin, and Information Systems Security Officer
Support
./ End user software support - Help users with applications on site
Administrative Duties
./ Develop and propose Information Systems poJicy
./ Participate in technology committees and conferences
./ Propose and process hardware and software purchasing
./ Coordinate the receipt, replacement and disposition of hardware and software with the
site inventory manager
FISCAL IMPACT: The $74,595 grant reimbursement will fund the aforementioned costs as wen
as $1,462.64 which represents the 2% for the City's indirect administrative costs related to these
actions. There will be no impact to the General Fund.
2
,co>.
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING
$74,595 OF HIGH DENSITY DRUG
TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) GRANT
FUNDS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THE CALIFORNIA
BORDER ALLIANCE GROUP (CBAG); AND
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 00-01
BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING THE
UNANTICIPATED GRANT REVENUES AND
APPROVING 1 ADDITIONAL POSITION IN
THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista currently acts as the fiscal agent for
the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) and acts as a conduit to hire support
personnel and acquire necessary supplies and services; and,
WHEREAS, CBAG receives an annual allocation of High Density Drug
Trafficking Area (HIDTA) grant funds the California Border Alliance Group will pay the
City of Chula Vista a processing fee calculated at 2% of the total funds passed through
the City to CBAG; and,
WHEREAS, the California Border Alliance Group has requested the
addition of one FTE Network Administrator position to support the Southwest Border
HIDTA office and the Narcotic Information Network; and,
WHEREAS, $74,595 have been appropriated for this purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accept
$74,595 of High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Grant Funds for administrative
costs associated with the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) and amend the
Fiscal Year 00-01 budget by appropriating the unanticipated grant revenues and
approving 1 additional position in the Police Department.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fiscal Year 00-01 budget is amended to
include said position.
Presented by:
Approved as to form by:
Richard P. Emerson
Police Chief
H:lSHARED/CLERK/CBAGSWBF/SCAL RESO
M. Kaheny
Ity Attorney
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 2/22/00
ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving the submittal to SANDAG of two
applications for the Fiscal Year 2000-012% Non-Motorized Transportation
Development Act (TDA) and Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) Bicycle
and Pedestrian Project Funds
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work"
C,
REVIEWED BY: City Manager taíV (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
The City of Chula Vista annually submits an updated list of projects for inclusion in the 7-year
impJementation program of the non-motorized element of the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program. SANDAG regulations require that official applications be submitted to
SANDAG in order for projects to be considered by its Board of Directors for funding. In order
for the applications to be official, Council must approve a resolution authorizing submittal of the
Fiscal Year 2000-01 Non-Motorized Transportation Project applications for available
Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) Funds. Both
funding sources fonn a single fund with annual allocations totaling $2.5 million for the San Diego
region. Projects are chosen and then approved for funding after the applications have been
evaluated by SANDAG's Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC).
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve a resolution approving the submittal to SANDAG
of two applications for the FY 2000-01 2% Non-Motorized Transportation Development Act
(TDA) and Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) Bicycle and Pedestrian Funds.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Annually, the 2% Non-Motorized Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds are made
available for the regional planning and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. TDA
funds will contribute about $1.5 million in FY 2000-0 I to the implementation of non-motorized
projects in the San Diego region. AJso, with the passage of Proposition A in 1987, an additional
$1 million of TransNet revenues per year is available for the implementation of said projects that
are submitted annually by the Cities and the County. The following is a description of the project
applications that we propose to submit to SANDAG for FY 2000-01 funding:
1) Bicycle Master Plan: The purpose of the new Bicycle Master Plan study is to review and
make recommendations as to how the current bikeway network within the City planning
area can be updated to best suit the needs of the City in the future. Total application
request is $50,000.00.
Page 2, Item S
Meeting Date 2/22/00
2) Sidewalk Safety Program, north side of Palomar Street between Fourth and Fifth
A venues: The project involves the installation of sidewalk improvements to increase
pedestrian safety and accessibility to the Palomar High School and Lauderbach Elementary
School. Currently the only concrete sidewalk along this section is at the frontage of Palomar
High School. The rest has either asphalt benn and dirt sidewalk or only a dirt path.
Substantial pedestrian traffic is being generated by the high school on Palomar Street and
the elementary schoo] located at the northeast comer of Palomar Street and Fourth Avenue.
In combination with recently completed sidewalks in the area, this project will provide for
a safe walking route for students and other pedestrians between the two schools and
surrounding neighborhoods. Total application request is $47,000.00.
The foHowing table shows the total costs for each project.
I Project I TDA Fund I Gas Tax Fund I Total I
I. Bicycle Master Plan $50,000.00 $50,000.00
2. Palomar Street $47,000.00 $50,000.00 $97,000.00
TOTAL $97,000.00 $50,000.00 $147,000.00
Project components that are eligible for TDA funding include the removal of existing
improvements, grading work, instaHation of sidewalk, and pedestrian ramps. Eligible items also
include traffic control, protection and restoration of existing private improvements, required
drainage improvements, and contingencies covering design and inspection. Gas Tax contributions
will cover the cost of TDA ineligible items. Gas Tax Funds can be used in the building or
rebuilding of streets, roads, bridges, and acquisition of rights of way or their component parts to
a degree that improved traffic service is provided and geometric or structural improvements are
affected including aHocated administration and engineering. This description is based on Section
I of Chapter 2 of the guidelines relating to Gas Tax expenditures, Division of Local Government
Fiscal Affairs. The Gas Tax requests will be submitted as part of the CIP review and approval
process.
Projects submitted to SANDAG must meet at least the foHowing criteria:
I. Projects must be consistent with SANDAG's adopted non-motorized plans, and be included
in an adopted regional, county, city or community plan.
2. If the project abuts other jurisdictions, it must be shown on the adopted plans of the
adjacent jurisdictions, or a letter must be submitted from the abutting jurisdiction showing
that cooperative efforts are underway.
Page 3, ItemL
Meeting Date 2122/00
4. Pedestrian projects must meet the design requirements of the American with Disabilities
Act.
5. Other sources of funding must be identified.
6. The City Council must approve the projects being submitted for funding.
Projects are also subject to prioritization criteria such as elimination of safety problem areas on
routes which would provide relatively safe travel use, service to high use activity centers
(economic, educational, cultural, recreational) including access to transportation system such as
transit centers, local effort in developing the pedestrian or bicycle project, and connection to and
continuity of longer routes provided by other means (e.g., regional park trails) to improve
regional continuity.
The FY 2000-01 application will be reviewed by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee
which is composed of representatives from each SANDAG member agency, CalTrans, the
region's transit development boards, and four members from the community at large. Based on
the Committee's recommendations, the SANDAG Board of Directors will authorize allocation of
the available TDA and TransNet funds.
A copy of the application's package is located in the City Clerk's Office for Council's review.
FISCAL IMPACT: Potential total revenues to the City of $97,000. The actual amount is
dependent upon which of the projects is approved for funding by the SANDAG Board of Directors
and the amount that they approve. This resolution approves the submittal of the applications, and
does not formally approve the implementation of the projects. These projects will be submitted
for approval in the FY 2000-01 CIP.
Attachments: Two TDA Applications
File No.: 0690-20-KY036
H: \H OMElEN GINEER lAD VPLAN\OOA - TD A, RDJ
5
IDA APPLICATION FORM
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Claimant: CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Amount of Claim: $50,000
Length and Type of Project:
Bike Path
Bike Lane
Shared Route
Related Facilities
Sidewalk
Other X
Project description:
Bicycle Master Plan Study:
The objective of the new Bicycle Master Plan study is to review and make recommendations
as to how the current bikeway network within the City planning area can be updated to best
snit the needs of the City in the future.
Note. Please attach location map proiect limits and !\p-propriate cross sections.
I. Project Eligibility (Check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. For bicycle projects, is the project included in an adopted -L -
regional, county, city or community plan?
B. If the project abuts other jurisdictions, is it shown on ~-
adopted plans of adjacent jurisdictions?
C. For bicycle projects, does the project follow Caltrans Bike N/A-
Route Standards from the Caltrans Highway Design
Manua], Section 7-1000; Bikeway Planning and Design
Standards? Ifthe project exceeds the design standard,
provide a separate justification for any added costs
associated with the higher standard.
D. Identify other sources of funding for the cooperative
projects, and/or specifY how the TransNetlTDA-related
costs for this application were detennined.
No other funding source.
II, Status of Project (check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. Resolution passed by governing agency - -
Approval of Resolution scheduled for City Council meeting on March 22, 2000.
B. On adopted Capital Improvement Program - -L
This project will be included in Chula Vista's upcoming CIP Program.
C. Maintenance and liability N/A -
m. Proposed Project Schedule (provide dates)
A. Preliminary engineering compJeted N/A -
B. Environmental Document approved. ~-
C. Final design complete ~-
D. Construction begins (Study) 2ND OTR 2001
E. Construction complete (Study) 4TH OTR 2001
JIJ. Evaluation Criteria (Check and fuJly explain in comments) Yes No
A. Does the project eliminate problem areas on routes
that otherwise would provide relatively safe travel?
I. Jntersections, driveways ....NlA... -
2. Bridges ....NlA... -
3. NaITOW road segments N/A -
4. Removal of parking N/A -
5. High traffic volume and speed N/A -
6. Wide crossing distance ....NlA... -
7. Other
B. Does the project provide service to high activity Yes No
centers?
8. Employment N/A -
9. Commercial ....NlA... -
10. Educational N/A -
II. Public transportation interface N/A -
12. Government or social service centers ....NlA... -
13. Cultural or recreational ..NLA.. -
14, Other N/A -
C. Does the project provide connection to and continuity Yes No
of longer routes?
]5. Inter-regional ~ -
16. Regional ...M.A.. -
17. Inter-jurisdictionaI N/A -
]8. Local ~ -
19. Community N/A -
D. Descibe the current and future contributions ofiocaI resources toward the project:
No other funding source.
E. SpeciaI Circumstances and Local Participation:
No other funding source.
HI IHOMEIENGINEER lAD VPLANI IDA 000 ),RDJ
Date: February 15, 2000
ESTIMATE OF BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN PROJECT COSTS
Project Name: Bicycle Master Plan Study Length: Citywide Miles
Construction Costs
1. Earthwork a. Roadway Excavation C.Y. X $ = $
b. Embankment C.Y. X $ = $
$ -0-
2. Drainage - Major Work
Describe:
$ -0-
3. Signing. Striping, Pavement Markings
Signs 18/mile! = $1,000/Mile }
Stripe = $1.500/Mile $3,000 IMile X - Miles = $ -0-
Markings 320 S,F./Mile = $500/Mile
4. Paving a. Agg. Base C.Y. X $ IC,Y.= $
I calc:
length x width x depth 27 ~I
- -
b. Paving Tons X $ ITon = $
I calc:
length x width x depth + 27 X 2 = Tons I
- - -
PAVING TOTAL $ -0-
5. Bridge Work a, Modify Bridge S.F, X $ IS.F. = $
b, New Bridge S,F, X $ IS,F. = $
BRIDGE TOTAL $ -0-
6. Fencing LF, X $ ILF, = $ -0-
7, Storage a. Racks ea. X $ = -0-
b. Lockers ea. X $ = -0-
8 Sidewalk
Cost per square foot $ 4,85 X 3.660 SF = $ -0-
g. Ped Ramps No. of Ramps X $ tramp = $ -0-
0, Other (Specify and identify unit costs if appropriate.)
Bicycle Master Plan Study (Lump Sum) $ 50,000.00
$
$
1, Construction Subtotal $ 50,000,00
2/15/2000
Construction Subtotal $ 50.000.00
Construction Contingencies 110% of construction subtotall
X 10% = $ -0-
Construction Inspection (10% of construction subtotal)
X 10% = $ -0-
2. CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 50.000,00
Non-Construction Costs
3. Design Engineering 115% of Construction Subtotal, line 9.) $ -0-
4. Environmental Document/Permits $ -0-
5. PROJECT TOTAL $ 50,000.00
6. Less Other Revenue Sources (Specify)
Previous TDA $ -0-
Previous TransNet $ -0-
$ ( )
$ ( )
$ ( )
7, CLAIM AMOUNT $ 50,000.00
8. Cost detail not shown above. Use to explain special circumstances such as deviations from suggested
percentage or unit costs. Do not attach additional sheets,
2/15/2000
TDA APPLICATION FORM
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Claimant: CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Amount of Claim: $47,000
Length and Type of Project:
Bike Path
Bike Lane
Shared Route
Related Facilities
Sidewalk 732'
Other
Project description:
Sidewalk Sa(ety Program. north side of Palomar Street between Fourth and Fifth Avenues:
Installation of sidewalk improvements will increase pedestrian safety and accessibility to the
Palomar High School and Lauderbach Elementary School. Substantial pedestrian traffic is
being generated by the high school on Palomar Street and the elementary school located at
the northeast corner of Palomar Street and Fourth Avenue. In combination with recently
completed sidewalks in the area, this project will provide a safe walking route for students
and other pedestrians between the two schools and surrounding neighborhoods.
Note' Please attach location map project limits and appropriate cross sections,
I. Project Eligibility (Check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. For bicycle projects, is the project included in an adopted ----L -
regional, county, city or community plan?
A sidewalk project with a Bicycle Route,
B, If the project abuts other jurisdictions, is it shown on ~-
adopted plans of adjacent jurisdictions?
C For bicycle projects, does the project follow Caltrans Bike ~-
Route Standards from the Caltrans Highway Design
Manual, Section 7-1000; Bikeway Planning and Design
Standards? If the project exceeds the design standard,
provide a separate justification for any added costs
associated with the higher standard,
D, IdentifY other sources of funding for the cooperative ----L -
projects, and/or specifY how the TransNetlTDA-related
costs for this application were determined,
Only the cost necessary for the construction (TDA eligible items) of the sidewalk is
included, Other funding will be obtained from local sources.
II, Status of Project (check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. Resolution passed by governing agency - -
Approval of Resolution scheduled for City Council meeting on March 22, 2000.
B, On adopted Capital Improvement Program ~ -
This project is included in Chula Vista's CIP Program.
C. Maintenance and liability ~ -
This improvement will be maintained by the City of Chula Vista's Operations Staff.
III. Proposed Project Schedule (provide dates)
A. Preliminary engineering completed May 1999
B. Environmental Document approved, N/A
C. Final design complete September 1999
D, Construction begins September 2000
E, Construction complete December 2000
III. Evaluation Criteria (Check and fully explain in comments) Yes No
A. Does the project eliminate problem areas on routes
that otherwise would provide relatively safe travel?
1. Intersections, driveways ~ -
2, Bridges N/A -
3, Narrow road segments - ~
4, Removal of parking - ~
5, High traffic volume and speed ~ -
6, Wide crossing distance ~ -
7, Other
This segment currently has an A.c. berm and a dirt walkway and some vegetation. The
pedestrians are forced to walk on the street during rainy days as this area gets too muddy.
This project will provide a safer path away from the street.
B, Does the project provide service to high activity Yes No
centers?
8, Employment - -X......
9, Commercial ~ -
JO, Educational (Elementary and High School) ~ -
11. Public transportation interface ~ -
12, Government or social service centers - -----X-
13, Cultural or recreational - -----X-
14, Other N/A -
This project is primarily intended to provide a safer route for students and other
pedestrians between the elementary school, high school, the neighborhood in the vicinity
and the commercial district to the west.
C. Does the project provide connection to and continuity Yes No
oflonger routes?
15, Inter-regional - -----X-
16, Regional - -----X-
17, Inter-jurisdictional - -----X-
18, Local ~ -
19, Community ~ -
D, Descibe the current and future contributions oflocal resources toward the project:
This project is currently in the CIP program with GAS Tax funding for the preliminary
engineering phase. The design ofthe project is completed. The final phase, consisting of
the final design and construction will start as soon as additional funding can be met.
E, Special Circumstances and Local Participation:
The City has already invested $50,000 in Gas Tax funding and is fully committed to
completing this project. This project, which has been in the sidewalk safety program, will
increase pedestrian safety and will provide a safer walking route for students and other
pedestrians between the two schools and the surrounding neighborhoods.
H:\HOME\EN GINEER lAD VPLANI TDAOOO 1 A RDJ
Date: February 15. 2000
ESTIMATE OF BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN PROJECT COSTS
Project Name: Palomar Street Sidewalk Installation Length: 732 ft Miles
Construction Costs
1. Earthwork a. Roadway Excavation C.Y. X $ = $
b. Embankment C.y, X $ = $
$ -0-
2. Drainage - Major Work
Describe:
$ -0-
3, Signing, Striping, Pavement Markings
Signs 18/mile) ~ $1.000/Mile }
Stripe = $1.500/Mile $3,000 IMile X - Miies = $ -0-
Markings 320 S.F./Mile ~ $500/Mile
4. Paving a, Agg. Base C.Y. X $ IC.Y.= $
I calc: length x width x depth 27 ~I
- -
b. Paving Tons X $ ITon = $
I caic: I
length x width x depth -c 27 X 2 = Tons
- - -
PAVING TOTAL $ -0-
5, Bridge Work a. Modify Bridge S.F. X $ IS.F. = $
b. New Bridge S.F. X $ IS.F. = $
BRIDGE TOTAL $ -0-
6, Fencing LF. X $ ILF. = $ -0-
7. Storage a. Racks ea, X $ = -0-
b. Lockers ea, X $ = -0-
8 Sidewalk
Cost per square foot $ 4.85 X 3.660 SF = $ 17,751.00
9, Ped Ramps No, of Ramps X $ Iramp = $ -0-
O. Other (Specify and identify unit costs if appropriate,)
See Item #10 (Continuation) next page $ 17,000.00
$
$
1. Construction Subtotal $ 34,751,00
2/15/2000
Construction Subtotal $ 34,751.00
Construction Contingencies (10% of construction subtotal)
34,751 X 10% = $ 3,475.10
Construction Inspection (10% of construction subtotal)
34,751 X 10% = $ 3,475.10
2, CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 41,70t.20
Non-Construction Costs
3. Design Engineering (15% of Construction Subtotal, line 9,) $ 5,212.65
4, Environmental DocumentlPermits $ -0-
5. PROJECT TOTAL $ 46,913.85
6. Less Other Revenue Sources (Specify)
Previous TDA $ -0-
Previous TransNet $ -0-
$ ( I
$ ( I
$ ( )
7. CLAIM AMOUNT $ 46.913.85
SAY $ 47,000.00
8. Cost detail not shown above. Use to explain special circumstances such as deviations from suggested
percentage or unit costs. Do not attach additional sheets.
2/15/2000
f--..
tj
e:
Cr)
Q::
"'C
~
I ;, ~
~ Q
f ). bj
'" "" '"
P:! \.) co "-->
~~kI <-
C)b!~ C)
-t-\.)~~ f::::::
'" \,j '-'S
(,oJ ~ is <..:> (,
\.) '" '--..J
~ ... ß lw
~~òi V)
a: 8; iÈ
/¡ ~ C) '" \,j f--..
~ è5 ~" It...J
\.). ""
., ~ - I, ~
~ ~ '- '-l.J
"""' - f"'\-
~ U) f::::::
~ Cr)
h..
'-
--.J
"'C
\.JLu
--- -.J
\.) " '<I:
;t ~ U
"" c::, .->--- tr¡
~~ f--.. a
is !:I:: '>c: <:
~ :::¡;bí.....
...¡¡¡¡
...:::","
~<":>Q
e::co.tij
V)~
is\.:>
\.)
CVPLAT 8-14-97 1:44:38 pm PST PROJECT FILE STL-241
DRAWN BY: TITLE: PREPARED BY:
CESAR V. MAGBUHAT CITY OF CHULA VISTA CESAR MAGBUHAT
J~::2000 Z1ŒT SHTS, PALOMAR ST S\W IMPROVEMENTS ~:~~~~~Ltis
-~.------ ~~
c c ---~~.-------- >----/ .'
~ ~ -,/~ ~,/~--, " /~--=---
!!' :E " ---- ..---- " ... ,/ ----~
Z ~' ~I I I ,.-
ID " '0"1\\\ I' I, \ I
-< -- " ""OÀ<r4~", "', I --\, " "', '.
.. -----,.~ \, '¡""" I I I
;II -~' /~ ,.---s~\ \ ... ,', I, "
~. I L)I~ I \
~!=' d ì_/" \ ' 1°'
0 c.., ï, " '
0 c:: "', I ",i,~ ,,~-', I \~",,~
~ "I/~'\" O,_'----'
I ' ! ~/
'" 'I", ,/ / ~ \",-,' .. , " ','--,", ----,
' i L-L', ~ \~-::~I'
, ! ~,' \ \ v---í \ ~.'1 ------ ,/-
, 'I': Í\'" \ uç" I '\--i~';:, \ '.: -- ~----------- ~
--¡," ,I~, \\ ~'" ", I ~ ----,,',',,"-
' ) ~I \.\.- \" \~ --~_/- ~
Z 2 "--j :\ \ \~ ,~\, -:-;- 1\A ~ . ,
I ~\ \ J---' '...-----' '. '4 ~ " '-, " C/, C/- , .. ----
.... "I II I, I \ ,I I'/~'~,/ ,-----,
. ,¡) \-'r.!' ~ L~ y' I ~=-\//'.Îi;
::j:~~ 'i ~ /_>-'~~'-~:J,\W \¿ê~'~~~/ '-- -----/
.... -,/""-"----"",,,,\ "-'----""""" " '"',','",,,",'~',~
~ -- ~:: ~>C/~~~<-" ~ --::::;'-:::~ -::-~ --~~:;;) .--,/
~,",~o .---- " " '" \-_..-'\, -:; >Ò ".--------,..",-- \~-\, /-->, ~ ...--Þ
. ~', ' '...---"'--' 'ö 'to ' ---- ~~. ,
~ ,L.! ~ (I, \, -y.---'n V ~,'o ,,--------, "------- "~ ~ -- ,/ , ----
- ,~,--!:z: ~ \ ".~\ \ '-- -rÞ ~ '.--------\ '----::::- "~'>-"/'/'-- .--------'
Z ,--,-'-QC¡ \ " /c-- ~~/, ~'7 '~, Î' .'---------; -~'/-::-'--_.-/
'1ft , ----L.., , ,~ I:':! L-,.c.---- "-------:\, \..---j "~" o ~ ~'~" :... - -
VII ",;¡. -é",',I""-------- o ~'\",~/ ...--
..... ,~~ C,!;s",---",\, 11,1 :...,,~I,'I\,r'\ .J" r...-----\.....J, ,~~ ,,' ., -- "
- '---'--c,~~' ( \ ,~,--, I" '0""--, \"'~,'--
-~....., 1l!§LJ¿, \ I I '~ n'. ----\-----,---- ------------- .-- .--,/
r- ,~,' ~,' I:':!,' " "" \~ /(\ÎS\~, I "/""Î".-/ I Î --,.: -,,~
r- ""----"!"'/ ,--'- , I "", ' o \ ' ~
'. I - : , 1.-/ ~ '" '-----, ",t",;....---'I, .------1,,";' " " - ~- ,,/
», , ,----- /'Í \ \ Y , , ,.;. "'.-// / .-
"U..... I "'~'",, 1,',/", ',',",,"""'~""'\, "","""""'~"'----------""" """"""", ;,....--ê,','~' ',/, ,,~'" ,/'-'--/ ..'~
D)- : '\~'.\ ,\II\Y"""" I,\'.>î,----~-
0 I ~ '- ",' j.-C/ ) ,I ----
Õ ;.- ,~~\ ',.-I
3 Z '----.'--' -----í", I '- 'c , "
-ê, " I >--:-', \ 1.:---" / .--" -
I» 0.., ,---------- , y/ <...-v~' " ~ .--// .--.
~ "T1 := ----; '---J ' '. /, ,1.---, \..-"'" I " ~/ \ .-- - - /~ ~
' 1ft 0 '~, \ I " I.', ' .1 : ' ,,""""" I ,/
VII ~'--'," \---\~.-------- ,
- en ð ! \ " \ \,.--"/~ \.---'-/~1 ',' ~ ~ I,
., - ~ ,!.--, "" ',~\ -«\\}'>, ,'~ ""'~ I
CD C \:I ~I \ ~n>', ' aO c-, 'd '
CD m '" I ", r," \~.. \" \ I' \ ~ , ~ ~ . ,/
-- <: S ';\"'-. \----- ~~ '.' \ 0 I 'f!, '\:II _/
Z < ~ - i~, 1)....-- '\Ç:\' \ \, \'" \~y , ,:\~\ 'i;;~ '/-,--'" /' .---c-'/'
o»~ ~í":' \ '\ \ \ \ / ~ <6~ ~ //
r- t"" .. ,-. I ,\.-i '$, r , -_/
;¡ " ~ ! \' \91 \......--1 \ í".. \ \ /' t::J ~ \, \""",~I_-
'3' ! ~\' \ 1...-----\, \.----\ .. I 'C--J ~, ,~ ~ '
- i \-~ I \.-----"""-' w ----'I, ;..\, \ .--
~3!: -",,! " '~'\ \</",\ \',,"'.~' '\J~\, \ \~.. ~""'" ..-/..---
C. "U , \ \ Y.-\ I ,I ~'í: \
CD;U ':,1, I,r-I\I,I ,
; I I I \ \, ", --
~ : r ",~ '.~"" ' \ ,~/\ \V----\\,/ "~..J---\,,' ,', \,,------..---"', " '
¡....-----\ I , ~..L~, \" ~~I""
m !.---\', I ~" ~\ ,,! \\' , 1':-----/,-
3: /\I\~,'""\\\,, \"\,'~ \c'-- ./
m -- :--J-'/'\\-:::,',',\\\~",", \,\él' , /--
z,---',,----, \',"'~"/" "
.....--'-" ',,'/"- \ ~,' '/-
..... .-- .J--e----" '/'..--- " --, --~/
-_:=:--::----::" ~ .//,/-- /~..----
.5
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL TO SANDAG OF TWO
APPLICATIONS FOR THE FY 2000-01 2% NON-MOTORIZED
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) AND
TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX (TRANSNET) BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN PROJECT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Chula vista annually submits an
updated list of projects for inclusion in the 7-year implementation
program of the non-motorized element of the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, SANDAG regulations require that official
applications be submitted to SANDAG in order for projects to be
considered by its Board of Directors for funding; and
WHEREAS, in order for the application to be official,
Council must approve a resolution authorizing submittal of the FY
2000-01 Non-Motorized Project applications for available
Transportation Development Act and Transportation Sales Tax
(TransNetJ Funds; and
WHEREAS, the following is a description of the project
applications to be submitted:
Bicycle Master Plan: The purpose of the new Bicycle
Master Plan Study is to review and make recommendations
as to how the current bikeway network within the City
planning area can be updated to est suit the needs of the
City in the future. Total applications request is
$50,000.00.
Sidewalk Safety Program, north side of Palomar Street
between Fourth and Fifth Avenues: The project involves
the installation of sidewalk improvements to increase
pedestrian safety and accessibility to Palomar High
School and Lauderbach Elementary School. Total
application request is $47,000.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the submittal to SANDAG
of two applications for Fiscal Year 2000-01 2% Non-Motorized
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Fund and Transportation Sales
Tax (TransNet) Bicycle and Pedestrian project funds.
Presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
H, Ihome Ilorraine I" 12%NONMOT
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION .OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE 619 AREA CODE
OVERLAY AND RECOMMENDING SAJD OVERLAY TO
THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
WHEREAS two years ago the Chu1a Vista City Council took a position in support of an
area code overlay rather than an area code split for this region, and
WHEREAS the California Public Utilities Commission chose to impose an area code
split in spite of this city's support for an area code overlay, and
WHEREAS the imposition of an 858 area code in certain northern sections of the County
of San Diego has already created a hardship on individuals and businesses alike; and
WHEREAS there are two additional area codes scheduled for implementation in the
County this summer (935 and 442); and
WHEREAS continued assignment of phone numbers in blocks of 10,000 will require the
number of area codes in California to increase from 25 to 41 by the end of 2002; and
WHEREAS assigning phone numbers in blocks of 1,000 will delay an increase in the
number of area codes for the foreseeable future, and
WHEREAS area code splits form divisive barriers among communities, and in this
county will separate the eastern and southern communities from the central business core of the
region; and
WHEREAS an area code overlay would be the least impactive option for the residents
and businesses of Chula Vista, and
WHEREAS, the City Council, at its meeting of 2/15/00, instructed staff to prepare a
resolution in support of the 619 Area Code Overlay which is also supported by Pacific Bell.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chu1a Vista
does hereby support the 619 Area Code Overlay and urges the California Public Utilities
Commission to make every effort to avoid fragmentation of this region.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Shirley Horton
Mayor
HlIsharedlclerkl619 area code overlay
~~f? Council Agenda Statement
-n-
r-,
CßY OF Item: I
CHUIA VISTA Meeting Date: February 22, 2000
ITEM TITLE Resolution; Authorizing the City Manager to Implement a Pilot
Project to Develop a Recommended Standard for Regulating the Placement of
Utility Boxes Placed in the PubJic Right--Qf-Way, and Further Authorizing the
City Manager to Replace Approximately J 80 Existing Power Supplies in the
Public Right-of-Way with Approximately 90 Network Reliability Units
(NRU's) in Cooperation with Cox Communications as Part of the Pilot.
SUBMITTED BY: Special Projects Manager ~-)
City Manager¡:;;';;
REVIEWED BY: (4/5ths Vote: Yes- No X)
BACKGROUND: Staff is recommending that Council authorize the development and
implementation of a pilot program that will establish uniform procedures and standards for the
regulation of Jarge utility installations that are placed above ground in the public right-of-way. The
impetus for this program is Cox Communications' proposal to install 90 to 120, "Network
Reliability Units" or "NRU's", in the next six months. After the experience with Cox
Communications Staff expects to come back with a refined version of the program for City CounciJ
consideration.
Before Cox Communication can offer telephone service they must increase the reliability of the
system and provide a redundant back up system that is capable of powering telephone transmission
in case of a power failure. Cox Communications proposes to replace approximately 180 existing,
single cabinet power units in the public right-of-way with approximately 90 new, two cabinet
systems or NRU's. Like the old units, the NRU's are powered by electricity supplied over SDG&E
transmission lines. The new units are substantially larger and contain a battery back up and
generator to recharge the batteries and keep the system running even during extended power losses.
RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends that Council adopt the resolution authorizing the City
Manager to execute the pilot program. Staff further recommends that Council direct Staff to return
to Council with a recommendation for an Ordinance that will update the specifications for placing
utility boxes, pedestals or other equipment above ground in the public right of way.
DISCUSSION:
Existing Policv and Procedure
The Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMe) does not currently contain a comprehensive system for
regulating the installation of multiple, large utility box facilities in the public right-of-way. At the
time the applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code were drafted Staff could not have
foreseen the changes in technoJogy that have generated the need for larger, above ground utility
improvements, or the change in the market forces that may increase the demand to place even more
Page: 2 Jtem:l
Meeting Date: 02/22/2000
such boxes in the right-of-way in the future. The applications for utility boxes are typically
processed on a site-by-site basis. Continuing to process individual site specific permits without
addressing the foreseeable and eventual outcome of a City-wide network system is an inefficient
way for utility providers and City Staff to handJe this demand, and to deliver the benefits of this or
future reJated technoJogy to Chula Vista consumers. Jt is aJso an ineffective way to plan and protect
the use of the right-of-way from the public health, safety and visual impacts that could result from
what is likely to be a larger group of service providers in the future. The effort to protect the public
interest in the right-of-way is made even more difficult by utility providers that do not submit
permits prior to installing a box.
The proposed pilot program will allow the City and Cox Communications to move forward with the
utility infrastructure necessary for the proposed service in an expeditious but responsible manner. It
will provide consumers with the benefits inherent in the option of choosing among multiple service
providers more quickly but at the same time will assure that those large boxes do not impose undue
visual impacts on the areas where they will be installed. The pilot program also provides Staff and
Council with the time and experience it needs to develop a superior set of standards and a process
that can ultimately be incorporated into the municipal code, and applied uniformly throughout the
City to all users ofthe public right-of-way. The program would remain in place for six months or
for so long as it takes Cox Communication to implement its NRU program. By the end of this
period Staff intends to bring back to Council a proposed permanent utility box program that
incorporates the lessons leamed from the pilot program experience.
Applicability:
Staff recommends that the proposed conditions and process shall apply to any individual or group of
meter cabinets, pedestals, power supplies, terminal boxes, transformers or other infrastructure
proposed by any utility provider to be placed above ground within or adjacent to any public right of
way (a "Special Utility Facility" or "SUF"). Although this program has been developed specifically
to process the Cox Communications NRU's, to the extent permitted by law, Staff shall apply the
program standards to all proposed SUF's during the term ofthe program. The standards shall also
be applied in new subdivisions as part of the subdivision improvement process. Staff further
recommends that SUF's that are less than 36 inches above grade (including pad) and/or less than (3)
cubic feet in mass shall be exempt. The final height and mass standard for exemption shall also be
examined during the pilot project.
Attachment A is a list of requirements and conditions that have been established by the City
Manager's Office with input from the City Attorney's Office, Public WorkslEngineering and the
Planning Department. Staff has attempted to organize potential applications into three tiers based
on their potential for impact to adjacent residences and businesses. The top tier has the greatest
potential for impact and therefore the greater number of conditions and requirements to address
those impacts. The subsequent two tiers have less potential for impact and therefore a reduced
number of conditions. The document also contains general conditions that attempt to balance the
reasonable use of the public right of way to deliver services in a prompt and cost-effective manner
and the City's attempt to protect the right-of-way from unreasonable or unnecessary visual impacts.
Page: 3 Item:í
Meeting Date: 02/22/2000
Characteristics ofthe Proposed Cox Communications System
The Cox Communications fiber optic system relies on a network of electrical power units that allow
signals for television, Internet and other services to be transmitted in each neighborhood of
approximately J,OOO subscribers. Cox Communications has sited and maintained approximately
180 units in Chula Vista to power its current system. The current power units are approximately (2)
two feet wide by (2) two feet deep and (5) five feet high (Exhibit A). Historically, the power units,
like other utility boxes, were placed in the public right of way where they were most convenient for
the service provider to periodically check and work on the units. Many of the power units are
currently placed in front of homes or grouped on busy street corners with a number of other similar
boxes.
The NRU's proposed by Cox Communications include two cabinets that are approximately (3) feet
deep. One cabinet is approximately (3) three feet high and the other is (5) five feet high. The
NRU's sit on a (10) ten-foot long concrete pad and are approximately (7.5) seven and one-half feet
in length (Exhibit B). The proposed two cabinet systems include batteries and a back-up generator
that runs on natural gas. A propane alternative is available where gas lines are not available
however, Staff does not anticipate the use of any propane units in the City.
The NRU's typically run on electricity provided by SDG& E power lines and generate a "light"
hum that can only be heard when standing within approximately ten feet ofthe system. When
operating, the system's natural gas powered generator will make a more audible noise. The
generator will not come on unless a power failure exceeds twelve minutes. The majority of power
failures are less than 4 minutes. Operation ofthe generators will be limited primarily to the duration
of the power failure after twelve minutes and the period of time it takes to recharge the batteries. It
takes approximately fourteen minutes to recharge the batteries following an extended power failure.
NRU's will be located at least 50 feet away from residential dwellings where maximum levels will
be 49.5 decibels. The Chula Vista Municipal Code states that the City should "strive for an
eventual reduction of day/night average sound Jevels below 55 decibels. In most cases the level is
well below the adjacent traffic noise that is likely to occur where boxes are located. The generators
are also on during testing, which occurs quarterly and lasts approximately 15 minutes. The testing
period will be set during regular working hours when it is least likely to affect adjacent occupants.
Cox Communications has stated that testing periods can be adjusted for each location if necessary to
accommodate the schedule of adjacent occupants.
Staff has also attached a list (Attachment B) of proposed sites and potential alternative sites. The
Special Operations Manager has visited each of the proposed sites with representatives of Cox
Communications to verify their acceptability or recommend that Cox seek an alternative. Cox
Communication's efforts to respond to Staffs concern have lead to a number of changes in the list
and design of the structures. Cox will use comparable quality materials throughout the City for
screening for any sites that may require that treatment. The plant, stone or other materials that may
be used in screening will complement the color and textures of the surrounding neighborhoods.
Cox has worked with SDG&E to develop a proposal to remove the gas meter originally proposed
for each new NRU. Cox Communications has also been very cooperative in working with Staff to
locate boxes in areas where they will have the least visual impact. Finally, Cox Communications
has made a commitment to remove up to 180 existing large power supplies shortly after the new
system is in place. All the old power supplies will be removed within approximately (3) three
months of the completion of the pilot project. The removal of the power supplies will have a
Page: 4 Item:l
Meeting Date: 02/22/2000
significant positive impact on a number of single-family residential homes and high traffic
commercial streets where they are currently placed. New units will be placed in far less sensitive
locations and when appropriate will be screened by existing shrubs and trees or by similar plant
material that is selected to blend into the surrounding plant materials. A conscientious effort has
also been made to keep the units off major streets and away from primary entrances of adjacent
businesses. Additionally, where it is detennined that plant material is required to screen the
facilities, Cox has committed to a short-tenn maintenance plan that will insure that the plants can
sustain themselves with the irrigation and maintenance provided to the site prior to locating the
utility box.
Finally, it has been detennined by the Planning & Environmental Manager for the Community
DeveJopment Department that the proposed Cox Cable Network Reliability Units are exempt from
further environmental review based on Section 15303 Class 3( d), [New Construction of Small
Structures] of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
FISCAL IMP ACT:
There will be no fiscal impact resulting ftom Council's adoption of the resolution or the
implementation of the pilot project. Cox Communications has agreed to pay pennit fees adequate
to fund the Staff costs associated with the pilot project. Cox Communications has also agreed to
provide the slump stone, plant material or other structures that may be necessary to help
installations blend into the area where they are located. Cox Communications will also be
responsible for removing graffiti from any equipment they place above ground in the public right-
of-way. Ongoing maintenance costs if any would be limited to any potential, incremental cost in
maintaining the additional plant material added to any open space districts to screen the utility box.
r¡
Submittal Requirements: (ATTACHMENT A)
A party seeking to obtain approval of one or more Special Utility Facilities (SUF's) shall be
required to submit the following to the City Engineer:
. A completed City fonn application. Only one application needs to be submitted for one or more
unifonn SUF's with common function and exterior design. Up to ten (10) SUF's may be
processed on anyone application.
. A site plan showing the location of each proposed unit, its pertinent dimensions, location and a
facsimile of the unit in the context of surrounding properties with applicant's proposed
screening if any is warranted. When warranted, the site plan shall include a description of
proposed plantings and irrigation plans and a maintenance schedule.
. Testing shall be scheduled in a manner to minimize any noise impact on the surrounding
neighborhood. Testing shall occur between the hours of9 a.m. and 6 p.m. unless alternate hours
are requested by neighboring residents.
. The appJicable fees for each level of processing the application. Fees shall either be based on a
fixed fee or time and materials basis with a deposit/draw-down or pay as you go system. Staff
currently estimates the fixed fee per SUF cost to be $750. The City shall exercise best efforts to
process each package of up to ten SUF's within 15 days of receiving complete applications.
General Conditions - All SUF's shall be subject to the following General Conditions:
1. Concrete pads for the structure shall be level with the existing sidewalk.
2. Raised pads shall be spaced as to not impede pedestrian traffic or cause a tripping hazard.
3. Units shall not be located in the parkway adjacent to a curb and gutter.
4. Proper visual sight distance must be maintained in accordance with all City standards at all
intersections and driveways.
5. Proposed placements shall not interfere with pedestrian or other sidewalk traffic, or the use and
operation of public facilities in the right of way (e.g. fire hydrants).
6. Sidewalks, pavements and other improvements damaged or disturbed during installation,
maintenance or removal of an SUF shall be restored to original condition.
7. Traffic control plans shall be submitted for City Engineer approval forty-eight (48) hours prior
to commencing construction, servicing or perfonning maintenance unless an emergency
necessitates immediate repair work be perfonned.
8. Graffiti resistant surfaces shall be used. The SUF owner shall survey SUF's for graffiti as a part
of routine field operations but no less frequently than every (30) thirty days. All graffiti noted
by or reported to a SUF owner must be removed thereby within three business days.
9. The Jocation, design and required screening (see Special Conditions, below) shall be compatible
with the character of the surrounding neighborhood.
10. Where screening requirements include plant material the City shall require a short-tenn
maintenance plan and/or agreement sufficient to allow plant material to be self-sustaining.
11. Each proposed installation shall confonn to all applicable laws including without limitation the
Americans with Disabilities Act and the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Chapter 12.20
requirements for bonding, insurance, and construction standards shall also apply.
Page 2: (Attachment A)
Special Conditions:
Subject to the General Conditions, above, each SUF shall also comply with the following set of
applicable Special Conditions:
Level I - Primary Residential
Description: ResidentiaJ and Collector]]] streets where the proposed SUF would be visible from
either inside a residential dwelling or from a front yard at a point twenty feet back from the curb
line or further.
Process:
1. Submittal of Application.
2. Coordinated Site Visit with City and applicant staff.
3. Notice to adjoining residents and residential dwelling units directly across the street
(approximately 150 feet).
4. Administrative hearing to consider/address neighborhood concerns if any.
5. Appeal right (for applicant and resident) to City Manager.
6. Issuance of approval letter with conditions.
Standards:
1. Site plan to include substantial screening on at least three sides and on all sides in highly
visible area.
2. Screening to be at least equaJ to the height of the unit.
3. Preferable screening to consist of plant material.
4. Alternate screening may include slope, walls, decorative block, fencing, or ornamental
"architectural" structures and complementary paint color as appropriate for the
surrounding neighborhood.
5. City may require the applicant to underground SUF's in proposed level I locations that
are highly visible and present significant potential visual impacts.
Level 11- Secondary Residential
Description: Residential and Collector] and II streets where the proposed SUF would not be visible
from the front of a detached single-family residentiaJ dwelling.
Process:
1. Submittal of Application.
2. Coordinated Site Visit with City and applicant staff.
3. Notice the property owner(s) immediately adjacent the public right-of-way.
4. Administrative hearing when applicable to consider/address neighborhood concerns.
5. Issuance of approvaJ letter with conditions.
Standards:
1. Site Plan to include existing screening, or provide adequate additional screening on up to
three sides as may be required by the City.
2. Provide plant material, walls, decorative block, fencing, or ornamental "architectural"
structures and complementary paint color acceptable to the City as screening.
3. Screening alternatives may be proposed by applicant and will be considered by the City
where applicant demonstrates their effectiveness to the satisfaction of the City.
4. Where site selection and other site characteristics substantiaUy mitigate visual impacts,
the City may elect not to require the instaUation of landscape or structural screening
materials.
Level IJ] Commercial-Jndustrial
Description: Commercial, Industrial and Major Arterials where the proposed SUF would not be
visible from a residential dwelling.
Process:
1. Submittal of Application.
2. Coordinated Site Visit with City and applicant staff.
3. Notice to adjacent property owners if City determines that the potential impacts warrant
such notice.
4. Issuance of approval letter with conditions.
Standards:
1. Supplemental screening may be limited to that provided by similar structures in the
immediate area, or to that needed to complement the surrounding land uses.
2. Where site seJection and other site characteristics substantiaUy mitigate visual impacts, the
City may elect not to require the instaUation of landscape or structural screening materials.
City Manager Modifications:
The City Manager shan have the authority to waive one or more conditions, or to apply additional
conditions, upon demonstration of special circumstances.
~ "" "gp ~
..<: <=I § "" "" ~.;:: "" "" '¡¡;
i U 0 ",.gO .§.¡¡; 0 0 '" ~
~ gj .5 5 '5 ~ 11.£' §< ~ 11 11 8, ~" ~
5 &~ ~ ]a <=I<=I~",,!5..~ <=I <=I gj 13'.5 ~
] ~B ~ ~,g ¡@gJ1j.g[if ;;' ¡@ gJ ~ 1j E Š
~ ~~ B a& ~~a~¡@ "a'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s
p ",..:.:"" ~o aoo<=l<=l 0 "<..!. oõ:! -
~ -b/)g ~ §~ o~~gj~ ~<=I~ ~ 9 ~~o..:.: ~"'b/)
.D ~ - --"" ~ -0- - ~ "'-~o .D
'3" 8 ~ g 8: 8: ~ <¡¡ tJ <¡¡ ~ 8: 8: -§¡ "".9'~ 1;\ 0 ,S
,~~ ¡@ ,,~1?~;::3°š~ 13~;::3 ;::3 'i::: ~~8<=1 a::¡J
~õ:! ~ ~~,~~~fi2~ ~B~ ~ ,S ~~~~ .~
~~ 5 '¡;!.s,"oo~o.~ """,0 0 ..:.: ~'aõ:!gJ¡ gj-
00 8 000~.~",~0 '"o~ ~ g ~o":':'- b/)'"
8] ~ ~<¡¡",.=u6U"'8 ~]6 6 .D ~~~.~ o'¿¡
-B.;9 êt 11 Š ~;9 ~ .9 .g e; ~ '" 1J.9 .9 J!J '.8 ~ '" ð3 o.g
0.',,;::3 0"f=!~'"~g,~8 ~"'~ ~ '" OOb/)õ"S! :;5'0;;
~..: ~ !5..õ..~'+'.fõ:!blJ¡:¡o. ~~õ:!. õ:! ~ ":':,.§::'5 ¡:¡~
~ ""~ 0 [if~',-È"5'¡::'.§.9'§ '~5'¡::'-"¡::ð3Ub/)~'~§!5.. "Q)'+-<
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ ~ '~ ~. S" 8 ] ~ ~ ~ ] ~ ,§ ,5 ~ ~ '5 ~ ~
e ~~ 0 c,,~o 80""" 00.8~8~~0~""+-<",, ,+-<0
'" ¡:¡"" '-~"'..<:blJblJ<û'¡::'" 80.blJ~b/) '¡::~,,;::30'- o~
~ .Q::a ~ '" § 13 S' ~..§ ,S i1f ~ .E 1$ ~ .5 õ:! ,5 § t; ~ 5 :è ~ ~ "" ..1J
'" o"'~~ ~.Q;::30"'t;"'a" .D,"t;..:.:t;-":':"'ablJo,+-< c~
~ :::~o'" ~~"¡¡)='¡;!'¡;!gj:õ 8o,¡;!~,¡;!,§~",,0'¡¡;~'~ ~~
~ "'o~~o ~ ~~Oo~b/).¡¡; <=Io",ooo.~'"""<=I<=I """0
~ .~:g~..:.:[if ð3.~:¡;;.-È'~~e;,§¡g J¡~~¿~~,S,:~g';;;~ ,~2;:
.~ ,¡:j",§g~ ~,,~õ:!7;;'~'~": 13~7'Õ7~õ"Q)~b/)~~ ,¡:j8,g
~ ~ ~ 5 ::@ ] gp ~ ~ gp & gp gpõ:! " .g gp § B gp-5 gp § ~ ~ gp oD g of ~ § ~.
= g;::3oo- 'ao""-..<:'a'-~~'¡¡;'-~-'ao.-~.~",,~.8~o y 0
',"~ SblJ <=10;::3 <=I"'", <=I<=I-,,'+-<ca N ..~o
~ ~'=:~"'b/) o:ggp'"""~"",, Uo'i3'¡::o 0..<::.-<::00080 ~õ...þ
,.......<::,ß 8,S~~""-"""",,,"~,o;;õ:!.0~00~¡:;;~.-<::"'0~~0~ ..<::~'"
~ U~Bou2u~u~0~u"..~~UN.U'¡::U>""""uu~"" U;::3""
,-., '" ~._-"'-,~ f=!~-"'~~ ""-8"'~"';>o'¡¡;""" 0 -"'<=I
'" õ:!~1<õ:!"'¡¡;0""l$æo055e;08 0"'0 <=I t: o,,~t: ",,"0
. '-,"~"OO~UO "'~~'"- ~._~~..:.:~o"..<:i~~oo '~o""
;:J gb/)]"õJOO'¡¡¡ o::a .¡¡¡,¡¡¡~,~~'¡¡¡~g'¡¡¡~'¡¡¡~'+';::'¡¡¡'¡¡¡,"'+' g~",
~ ~~1J~~.;Š~~~~~~~~~~~::;Eõ..~ð~~£Z~~~£ ~~~
~,~ o'¿
¡:: § " ~ ~
;:J -ê'~ ~ "" ,-
j:;> 0 8 o'¿ 10 >-
:.= ::9 <£ '" ~ ,-, .!'!
:E ~ ~ ð3g .g;j!; ~ ..ê
'" <=I ð ¡:::-c <=I '¡¡;~ ~¡;..gu
.~ ¡:,- ~ §<æ 0 ~ 8 '" ~ '" '+-<
OJ 'i-, ~~ .!'! Z5' '¡¡; M 0 u"" e; 0
¡::,::: '+-< ,9<"" "8 '+-<U'~ 7 ~ "õ ¡gu õ ~ ~
-t: 0.g.5 0 ~<=I::;E ~'" ~ °ð:i~ U S ð3
0 ~ g..<:: ~æ"l::~ ~~ §8 8 ~~u ~ 8 ~
~ ~ 00"E'i ""t;:i0~.8'" 7 U "'0;::3 '" .s
õ ?". 0 § '+-< Z"Q) 0."" ~ ~ $ '€ C';:: - gj '"
Z "Q) ""';. ".:;¡:;;.D Z","a ð3"" '" o,+-<o"õ ,"õ ;;
~ <=I"' >-"<"'0" >'"" ZO".. 0-
~ ,- c '" "'.=:"" <;::0 ;><£ õ.." ,"v ~ ~d .!'!
00 lO'¡:: OO-'¡¡; ,v. ..<::" """'~oo" 0",;::3
~ ~~ s~æ..<:: ð3~ "1::0 z.¡¡; ~S ~ -U ..<::
'+-< ~~ O,+-< ~ -'+-< Z°'+-< '+-< ,"o~~°"l::", U
0 '+-<,+-< Uo"õ;::3 [if 0 0. 000,€ ~UaoUd'i3> '+-<
.g ~ o.g U 0 0 ~ Z 0"E ,g u' 0.5 0 0 ~ ~ u 0 ~ t; 0 <û ì:: 0
cæ "".gD~::a::a~ -~<£ =.=::as::ag u~~oo~~""~<=I]
,~ '¡¡;'¡¡;~;>"'oo", ~ " ~""""~'" N"';>"'C;>",'¡¡;::a'~o
~;9 uu..<::;9;9u§< ~;90 oo;9oo;9~:~;9¡g "<::::;EUo.u
U;::3 ooU;::3;::3o..:.: ~;::30 O~,"~;::3~ooo,"," ;:: ooUo
3a ~~~aa~~ ~a~ ~Nz~a~~ooz~~z~~~3~
" "
~ ~
0- -- - -- 0
~~ ~~ -~~~ -~~ ~-- --~-~~---- ~-
0 "'.D .D '" .DOU
~ 0 -N~ 7~~~~~OO~O o~o
00- N~ 7~~~ oo~- --- --------N NOON
~ e:: » a
~ 0 ..0 0
§-g¡ ~ ~ ~ ~o
.;:: ~ ..c:: e:: ¡,J ~ ~
¡o;~ g §..o gp~-
~B 8 ~ ~ ~ ~~~
o¡¡'" i:E '" ~ ~ ><o¡¡u
at 0 6 ] ~b u~'ê~
°u '" 1¡¡ .;;: ';::.~..... 1;;~u.-
~e:: 8 OJ) ..... ~ @~~ 'c~~B
u~ u,5 8 8 u..o';;; g.B~'"
.þu- 8e:: 'õ. 0 ':=:~"'" "'-08
~"¡;j o~ ~ "'~o ~~e::o
~.¡:: ..c:: tJ r .S » .-"i ~^u ~z "'~ o¡¡
~u u~ o¡¡ ..c:: '" U~e:: ~ .....» "
81;; =:::~ ~ u ~ ~u~ "'o'¿je::", 'a
u8..o", Be:: '" '¡,J.-"i ""'e::1J~u
"'..... 0..... u ~ 1¡¡ ~-u ¡::o"'" ~
""¡:: 8¡:: u..... <.¡.<¡::~;:I OJ) 1J~u1¡¡u
e::Oj ,,1J e:: ~ '" ui'::.þ e:: "b5"" ~
OJ'õ. u § ¡¡¡ ~ 6b u "':Q -u 'S u~:::::"" '" o¡¡
õ;::a'-¡;j~;;. u '., Õ ~ ¡'j&~ ~ .e:ê::..!¿§~"'o::'S
-~o 0 u... -"""", """"~ ~--~
o¡¡¡~1~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8~gp ~ ê"'1;;~8~'R
.5u"",088 if 0 0 ~ 0""';:: OJ) "bUOi.-"i.-"iu
~ 'õ. 8 ~ ~ ,- ...^ ;:õ U 'E <./:i 8'R .5 J;! U 8 ~ .-"i^ 1¡¡ ~
"'~.Þ",.~~ u""""" ¡:¡ '" ",-u ~ "'1;;°u-~~
~~~.....",o ;;. ê 0 ~ .-"i "'o¡¡..... ,- .-"iu..c::"""
-"",,¡:¡u~ .- - e:: c:: c--... °e::U >< uo"",--¡';e::~
.:!:!""" N", 1;; ~ 0 ¡¡¡ ue::'" ....;::.:!:! u u_O"'U'-..o
.8ê8~-§..o~N S i'::~'" ~u .::,;:;.>~ ¡,J.~8 ~ "'i'::1::J¡:Q~~
Ua.~ 0 u u';::u^ 1;; 1;;",e:: ai><~ ~ Oi'o "'.,::.'¡¡¡
~]<i~J¡~ ~ i~i i8.....S~~ ;:Õ~B '" ~.r<./:i~]~=
~~d88u~ 1 ~.:!:!~ ¡!~~~e:: ~~S1:: ê ~¡:¡.S8~æ~
'.,"'",ooB1;;...o¡¡ 0 "'"¡;j'" u"'»"'o...: '" -uu Õ ._U"¡;j ..o~.-"i
"0 1;;; '~ ~ ,S ~ 1;.s ~ o¡¡ ] ~ ] = ~ ~ ~ .; "¡;j = g -g 5 .8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1:: 8. oi
~ ~ 8 B 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ 5 § gp ~ gp 0 ..6' ~ 5 ~ jg ~ .r ~ ~ ~ ~ EJ gp ¡:¡ ~ å ~ ~
.5 ta'õ.~~tJu.:!:!'tJ:ë,cl: '~.e.'~"'!3.e:.gp.e:..:!:!]B¡:¡EJ~~ ;S ~'~~u'u"¡;j]
-¡::: ""'O¡¡"'~~~-.,~8E '-.Þ'-~-~.Þ'a.þ-""'~i'::õ"¡;j ~ ~.-~i~.c",
0 ê-sê~~æ",~~~ n~næ""~.-~",,e::uu=¡,;o'¿j .-"i uno~u~e::
u 'õ.!~§'¡¡¡~g-¡¡¡~~ ~~~~õ~~~g~]~;~8 b g~511~~
~ sn~<¡s~o¡Sw~ o~o8.e::~<~O~i'::Z~'.,oo ~ ~o~_oos~
OJ
a b '" '"
~ ¡o; "5!i § § §
en,~ u;:s ~ ~ ~ ~
~ :> a b- '., ~ ~ ~
"-'.; '" .- '.., u - '" '" u
::9] ~g.ta ~ ¡¡¡Q g - ;:s;:s -,
OJ u EJ~;:S ~ ooo'¿j ~"¡;j u u ~
¡;:: ~~ õ '" 8..c:: 00 8 ;::;:: '"
o'¿j ~~ Q e:: OU »..c:: 0 0 "
q:: » .Ë..o "'" ..... :s ~ !3 u o¡¡ .S< u u = 8
~ ~ 1¡¡~ ~ Æ~ ~Õ ~æ ~ g¡ g¡~ ~
...... "" ue:: ~ ~u 8e:: ¿::~ ~ u Uu ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :9 ¡,J 8 u :$ EJ ,S ì ì ] 8
~ ~ :9'., ~ u= u~ :9ta,-? ~§ ~ ~""~ g
....., 00- ._.....",~ """"'" ~u::r:~ ^,- ~ ~e::"'"
~~ "'" ~ ~u,-u .-u", ""'e:: ~ ~~ ~ ~...,e:: ~
0 ..c::.... u~:> ~..o.". ~ e::~ 0-", '" w..o¡U U
... ;::0 "€.Þ..c::~ ..c::""'~ ~~o......:=:oo S S~8 'õ.
g oZ o~;::",^~ t:~õ e::'.,»;g =:::u.". .".-~ '" "¡;j
en § ZuZUzog!3.....~O¡¡Q !J°.....go::r:.=~~o~Z"¡;j,¡::
~ u J5 õ~' ¡,;..c::8......S"", e::õ¡'j~", ~~ ~ ~.8'" ~ 'E ~
~ ~ !~ .Þuu~~U.Þ~~~ ~~¡s¡s.s ~~ u u~ta u ~ ~
~ u ..... "'~o¡¡e::oo....""" <~ .....o¡¡ ",-, '" "'.....u '" '" e::
~ ¡,; oo~ oo"'~'¡::~~~~'., ~~"'b u~ '., '.""e:: ~ S -
~ ~ Uu u~~~~~~~..... ~EJ,~ð:~ "€"'~¿~~~ 0 ~
~ ~ ~c:: o~~~.....~~..oB "'...='" ~ ~~~oo~ ~ ~
...0 0 ,.o¡¡ ,.O~~~N~~ë> ,.u--- "'00'-0--0-0 --
.::! 00 ~¡Z¡ N¡Z¡"-~ N~;;> ,.<::r:UN w~ Z:>oo:>~~oo - -
~
~ ~ - ~-~ -- - ~ -~ - ~
0 - -- ---- --- ----- -- - - --- - -
~
t ~ "'..0 N~~~ ,.~~ "'~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ oß- N ~
Z N NN NNNN NNN NNNNN NN N N ~~~ ~ ~
~ Q) '+-< ::::
Q) ~.-'< 0 Q)
.... ::c :\J :9 ;.:::: Q) "O:-S¡
gp O'¡;:; =' ¡ç¡ Þ£E ~ '"
13 .~ <= ~ ~. ~ 8. ~ '¡;: § ~]
0 B.- Æ~ <=: <=: O,+-< =' ~;;. <=: ~
~ '! n ~; ~ ~ I': ~ 6 ~ :::: i
~g.~:\J "".'=:Q)Q) Q)£:! ,,8Q) õ:'¡;¡
::: """0'" Q)15 6 6 13Q) æ ~ $ Q) ~
~ g;~~ ê"<=: ~ ~ ~e. "'. 8: § <=:
.¡:: ~ p..'¡;:; ~ ~ a a gp "0 ¡¡ =,,9 p.."::
~ ": a"O ] @¡ Q)';;' ~ .~ .~ ¡¡ ~ ~ §' ,"
§ 688 -<=:~EQ)~ '~~ ~ 0 ~ '" 5
'" 8"'~ M~~"'~::: Q)~ Q)þ~ ~ ~ ~
õ: ~,-êQ) '.§"'.:-:.-'<!5.~ ~<=: ..oï3U ~ '¡:: 8
Q) 8:.: & .~ ~ ~ ~ 8 '¡;; ] ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ê
§;;. ~~~ ~J:1§"O8:] [¡-~ 8ê~ £ ~ 813p..
....<=: - ~§,,~ .... "'0" '" ,- ~"O
8 o~~ g~~.-'<::::6 ~8 ~u'¡:: i b §~B
S' ~::::.å ;;':;cr~~:\J& ~~ :::..B~ t¡¡ 1¡j8 p...;i
~ .~ U~Q)'" p"Q)Q):::", ....'¡::.-'< 8"" M'-,
6 .-'<.Q g, ;;. ~ ~ ~ "'. Q) ~ -g ~ B g B ~ ~ ~ .S õ: ~
8 ] oj)'"§t¡¡'¡;¡ ~~Õ:]t3:a M 3a ::C'~§ Q)] .~Q)8:9
i Q) ,s..o~~ b313~Q)15 ,S ~~ ~~P.."'6 ~ nQ)~
§' ] 6 ~ ;;.:;-5 ~ ~:-æ ~'~ 13 ai 6 Q) ~ ] § !5. g¡>~ 8 .~ :\J p.. ~
~ """O~'>~<=::9 ~58B.Q§ ~.~"'~ ¡;:)ê"'~"'].~ ",§'::::
0 <3~",~4!..~,~ ~~~8.~0" ","O8.g¡> oj)~'~~b n ,¡";,~
M 8"" g¡> -:: 9 Q);;' 0 8 .$ "0 ~ ~ 1i gp 8 ,$ .~"O ,s.... Q) 0 1¡j Q) ;:§ 1i 0
.~ 8['~".E~~ g¡>õ:.-'<ê'5"i3'~M",'~.~ 6.Q:\J~8 g ~i3'"
Q) ""Q).~:::.gp"'M '-Æ]Q)~&~'-"..oQ)'" Q)S"""õ: . 0"'3
~ ~..ont3 3:.Ei~6~:>'<;::ai3§nõ"':\J¡f bÞ~"Æ ~ ~]Q)
"0 ~ ~1?Q)~~-Q)""8¡¡~~~~-Q)<=:13"'~ ""-:::,€~..o ~-ß
~ gp -.. 8 ¡g..¡::" 'ð.~ ã ~. 5 '¡;:;. ~..§ § g¡> ¡g.¡¡' 0 .i ,S .~ ~"O 8 g¡> ~ ~ '€ gp b
5 ~ õMQ)~QB"OBQ)8~"'~-~Q)~~:96 ~g§<=:~§o o~"O
'1;1'~ ::.S'~8"'a8~'~Q)'Beg¡>g¡>,~.~>.E§,~~ '~~~o,~í5..~ z.~§~
0 Q) § 6 "0 <= b ~ M"O"O ~ ~ o',,'~ Q) "0 ~ <.::: ~ ~ r.LI gp t¡¡ ~ Q) b 08 ~ Q) Q) ~
<">:\J ~~8ro-g§õ8gp..t¡¡",.~'~:\Jg~t¡¡"'0 :\J°Q)§1AMQ) ",1A~'"
~ ~ >~"~~P"z""~~on~~,,~~~z ~-5zP..~~~ --<~~8.
(\)
~ i ~ B .-
'" j: ~ " b ~ ~ ::r:
¡ :~ ~ ~ ~ o'd .¡;:; ;
......~"" <!; ~ -N >",~'-
~ ~~ ~Q)Q) 3 ~ ~ Q)"O ~ >
::9 ~~ ~ ê ~ ::= Q) 'õ ~ ê :::.-'<-3
.~ b£ í:::1 ~ '" ::r: 5J¡ ~ ,~ " ~ ~.~~
¡.¡., ,,- 0,,"0 ~ B" Q) > Q "'" o:::u
~ ~] ~ .-'< § .... ~~::: ~ 0 $ z6'+-<
",$:> Q)~"""'¡ Q) ",Q)""-g",,,~o
ð ~~ ~ :::'õ§ § 6E] 8 §~> -g~§
~ ",:> ~ ~~'¡;¡ ~ ~- <= ~ ~ß'õ .~~<.:::
'" 0.-'<' Q) U ._~" '" ~ r.LI U "0"'£ ~'+-«=:
~ "'t¡¡ :s! t¡¡ ~~ê B ~ .S<=: 0 § §'õ=, ::r:o;
~ '+-<~ ~ "'"OQ) 0"'>. " ~'" :\J ~ 0 0 ,,£~
OQ) .Q ~t¡¡Z ~'~o Q.S '€ ~Q)~ " oob~'" .>-"'~
~ t::~, Q) ,+-<" "j: ~~ Q)",'-. 0
'" Jj:::~ ~.§~ ~~g~~~ Q)g,~ ~;~ ~ Ƨ1~i$~~]
'ã ,S ¿j.~ g; t¡¡8 S' ~ 'š ~ ~ gp ~ ~ 8 ~ -g ~ '8 § ,~õ ~ 'õ Æ ~ ~ ~ .~ g ~ ~ è
;:J "..0" "0"" Q)o,":;;¡~", - '-'=:=,"""O"g Q)ô:¡B .~t3~ro .s
.<;::..g8.<;:: °t¡¡~- N",...t¡¡"'o ~~~:;:::0",,--g...¡,,:O~"'~0-<=:u6<=:
~ ~""'~~ ~8~ ]~~~.~~ o~æ~~'~~"'o~~§æ:::-g~~õQ)Q)
= ~80M~ o.Q~ 'S'¡t¡¡'¡-ê ~-~".,~0"".,80:\J~~¡o~"'gd~~§
~ "., o~ ~,,~ Q)~Q)~W ~~~~~Q)O "~~",N"ro."roa_-
.~ ~<':::..o~ ~~- ".,N"",c:"",Q --~-~lfJ~<':::~r.LI;:>Q)~~~uuu¡:qr.LI
~
~ - ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ----~~~ - ~ --~
0 - - --- --- -- ------- - - - ---
~
~ ..0 ..0..0 ..0..0
Z ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
... ..<:1 §.Ef OJ) 0 ...
'" ... ...... Q... §
~ .~ :s g¡ .~ i:J .~ .S Õ,
==..><: 8 8"" Š'¡;!§ OJ)
" ~ 0 0 ~ ~ """;:;.=
5; Õ 813 <I:: OJ) '" õ,~¡;!.~
" '", gj"Š 'ã.§ ~ "" ~ ~ e- ~
<B §'"dïSg- "'.:!3 1;¡.- ...§o"
0 U Õ "'" i) ~ oDt; 0 g :g
- i)..<:1 ~- > ..<:1..><: OJ)E.- "-
"""'Uro ;>0 u... Qro....-
w -:::"""~ 0'" """ .-uQ"
g :- go"" ~ 8"" ¡:¡2Š :ë.-ê
ï:'L -g..<:1 Qgf 1'j 2 ".S ~~" 'u;'"
.,J' ro ~ t;ïS ~ ou oD", ~'> ¡g~ OJ)
¡:¡ "fJ 13 "'@ ] ~ '" :9.g OJ)11 [",,~ Q
8 ,,¡:¡ ... ~m "Q 0 =ã g'u; '.§~8;';::~'5
~ ""oD"-- 8" 8 ~ ~o """'- ""u "
8: ¡:J:g ~::¡¡¡8 ..8 ~ ~ OJ) "ì '¡;!ð~ 'Bg b
~~~oD § ~~ b Q õ.S ~Q ~~~~... :
...~Q"'<I:: OJ) " ._._~o ~ ",0 """"'!i;" Q
o"ro~ Q Q~ § i).C..<:1'- "'OJ) "'~o ""~ ~
,,'"d-;:;'"d .- 's" ""' >"u ~ 8..S '"den"" "-~' .:!3
~&g~ S]~ ~ 2~en ~~";';::¡:¡ §8~ ~~13 ~
.-Š=ãõ,'"d ~ ~~ gf 2~~ "'~8gf""~ "gfE'"d:9 "'813 ~
~8~1J - ,,0 'U; 0§i:J '"d"""'s'B~ '~'S¡:J£'" ~gg '"
"""', .s OJ) 8 "- "-" !i;S~""" ~"o 0 >- '
~ OJ) 0 b iG !i; ~ 0 ,,:9 "" 8 ~ i:5"O ~ ~ .§< E ~" S ì .-§.~ g¡ 8
'C.=E"" '"d";;;'õ i:Jê-"'gf~ .groo~",~ ,,~"',8Q E~i:J §
~'~~o§" & ~'" ,8~i'~~ '.,õ,~0J)~..><:!?!J~0J)0~':;: O)Š"8!?!J~
S" '" ... 'S" '-+-<'"d>'-~"'QOJ)...QQ"'.-..><:Q "Q ~ .--
""i) ,,~~ Q§;>"!i;~OQ8~~~S"~~~,, "'S"S~
§ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..5" .;;; 7. g' ~ ~ t; ~:~ ",,~ ~] ~ ~.~ .S~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ]: ~ ~
- -QQ - "'OJ» >-= -~E~>w~.-_WW..<:1- -_u'"
~ ""ro""" "'Q";:;";:;.=,,"'O 0"..;:;"""..<:1""-:::"0..."" ";.Q""""
Q) OJ)"OJ)O) Q ~._'" ro~2""¡:<: u"ro""C"OJ)"""U"'§" ""ro'"dOJ)~
::! Q!3QQ 0 OJ)~" "'-L..O...O...""""...oDQ'"d"',,-""" 'C"'o"Q"
.... ";:;""';:;0", "'.-'" "'"r-..<:1","O""""",enOJ)";:;o"oo... ..._ro',;:;"O
':g .~.§.~~...~ o~~ ~~~~~"~~~'~"><:'='~~'~i:J~og;~OJ):"§'~'"
0 "Q"å"'å ~gf..><: ..><::g~~.,§-;S:9..><:'"dJ;¡:¡""""d0...¡:¡~!i;]i)""€
~ ~~~"§,, ,,'.,~ ~..><:~!i;!~g~~8QG~~8~;:G:g~!i;~~0
~ ~o~¡:<:~¡:<: Z~en enO~~~oen""enC~",~ZC_~",oD_~S~Z
Q)
d .~
¡jj ] Q §:;::
00 ... 0 ~ p
1A " ~ ~§Jj!
00 S en ro U .-
<è S~ Õ u..<:1~ " i)
:9 ð5z..8 "8,ê--ê § E
Q) '"d u ¡;!bD~ ""." 0
..... § ¡;! en OJ) " :;:: ~ 0 C u
¡:¡., i) ~ ,.!:¡"P ~"O ~
ct:: '"d E--< '" " E--< õ3 -g .- ~ '"
ro §... Q E--<o""' ro ~ ~ "
.... ~ <ñ'" ,,'"d"'~ ... - ¡:¡ -;S
0 .~ -" .E § i) gf ~ - 6 tj... g
';i;'i;; ~~~ ",¡g.., 2 8 ro'~-" "en
, .-... "'-... 0... > '
~ ¡:¡ ~en '" ~u'" C <1::'- " :9 ~
~ ~ Q~ ...¡ OJ)"" '0 '" §.~ ¡g... '" ~
C ~~ ~ g<B~ i) 8 ~> ~s ~ '"d~.s
!i;~"'"Qo... E u'"d'"d 0 ¡:: 0 ¡g
oo""~"Q"'iG 0 ro§§ ...~u ~ en...
~ Q oD'õ ~ ~~~ u...~ ~ '"dQ'" ""~ ~ ~ ~'õ
8 ~ .~.g¡~ ì~" ~!I~ 1 ¡g~1 ~~, 8 ~Q ~~
~ ~ i;;~ß! ]S~ 2~en~ "" ~",en 8!-;S ~ 2~]2
~ ¡:¡ ¡:¡-;s~~i)~~C QC"€~~ ~ ~]C ¡:<:,,~~] ~~ ~~
..... -~ ~g""g;§~~;;:; ~f:o;;:;[,,!::;:: §o~;;<:: gro :2~ Qg
~ 0 Cen~~uUU ~ Z~- ~ ~~N ~~~~~ -~ O~
Q)
~
~ ~ -- - -- --~ - ~~~ -~-~- ~~~-
0 - -- - --- ----- - --- ----- ----
~
~ oD
Z ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ;;<::~@~~ ~ ~:2~ ~~~f:~ ~~ ["!:~
~ ".::; ~ ,g
1A "" ~ 1A :s!"E ~
'" ~ ..0 '" '" '" '" '"0
.~.: ,.š *.¿; '"0 ~ 5 ';;1
'" 0 () oj '" 0 - ("')
"8 ~ ~~ ..9 E 5,,;:; 2: §
5'0~ ~6 ~~ 5.ê Š ~ 6
.,roj ",-50 "'". ....'" 2 0 ~
'" ¡;: ""8>f::!~(;j'" "'~ "" (;j ~
Š""¡:: 08- ""¡::1A ..08 §' '¡:: 0-
'" g,-.,t; ..0:"" '" ::~.... ,g() '" ~ ... oj
>-"'~"'6" ",oj 0 ,.,oj ""'¡; oj -'¡::
0 ..o:i5.... 6.- 8 ."" 6"" r: ""¡; 0 ,~'" 6 '"
""""oj'" ,,~"" §""'" -""¡::-""" 6'"
~ 6¡: ~1 6 2~g,~ r~*.~ *~ 2 6
~ ~~,5 oj", ~ 0~()8 ......0:6 * 6~ ß~ ~
(;j .",,~~ S:s! ~ ~~]b ~~"E 8 ~~ ~~~~
¡;: "'",..0 0'" 0 ~,~""" O.....oj... _.- "'-
'" oj >."" ~.... - ~- 0 "" ""<+<- § ""- ,- ::;';;1 ""
i1 ~'1i1 ê ~ oS 3 ~-] ~.ß ~ ~ ~ ~ gp .~ 2 '¡; t ,ß
" ..,8~ :s!80 t ¡;:~>,;!)~ ',p:s!.5 "" ',p~ '.,'¡::05.[3
" '" '" '" 0 " ~ '" '" - '" '" ~ .... '" 0 ~
8 ("').:::;~ ",8 '" ~jj8""a '>«"').[3 ',p '><;'1 ~"'o~
"" "," - '" '" " ,~'" '" '" '" '" '" ~ en '" '" - ... 8'" v
7J ~ ~ ,~ .s ~ ~ gp.~.E ~- ~ b .¿; 1j 8 ~ 'B ~ "E ~ ~ "E ~ §
oj ",""" ",'" -'S""""-,,, ojob~ ",..o::g"" -oj',p=;
..0 ,-~" 0- """""~8~"" 8 '" en...."::; 8~oj'"
~ @~~ 6~- ~~~~;:;.g'~]~]]~f ~~~."" ~~j~
¡;: .....-- "'.- ~ 0'-'" '" '" '" -§ ",.--()
.... ~""~~b~~£~....-õ80~"'~"'~8 oj~~", ~8.~"'..9
0 --~p"'aen8,""':::',p:g~8¡::",8",8:Q~ *""",~", 'S~"~..o
-",,'" """-- """""~"" __en- 0 ._0", '" "'"""'"
~,5.ê~8~8~~~'><8~,,§~§~§i~ g~1A¿:s!",~~1A'~6
~ '¡::6':&oj~~~~:s!~.]~£~~~~""8 ¡'~"'I~,~~i1"'8,~
:g ¡:¡¡~o",~~""¡;:""~~"'....t....~..o:gp~'~ -"']"'ì"""'("')]....£
¡:: o¿~~~'tJ',po.....5"""¡;:6~:t=::;.,p"õ',p,,,~ '¡; 8oj:s!",8.ß",oj"",=
~ O""';;1""en.;!)~~.0=£8~~""',;!)-,;!)"'~ ¡;:!~eno!.;!)O~:s!~
§ ~~"€2~~';;1~]6~~~~~§~§~I~ ~~§]6~~6§~6
u <=i';!)ol""1AI'¡::1A~g<=i""bg1A1A~1A~¡;: ..ê8,,~~81Ab,,¡jb
~ O~Zu..9~¡:¡¡.5",~OO~<o~~..9~« ~~~~~~~~~~~
IU
S oj
en <=i ... ""
¡'j .... o.;!) 0 '" ~
gJ Ë .§:> 3~ ¡;:t
<r: 0 "õu ~"",~ "õ8
~ ~ ""¡; "'.ê §~ "'8
Q) ¡(JB" i1b 8 '" ~'" ~ .g~-
.~ "'oj '" 0 ""~8,s '-'."1¡(J
~ ..0:1) tJ £u ."" 0 .- ~ "'~'"
q:: t::<=i ~ "'."".... § '" g~ ~ .¡:¡¡£
f"J .¡g 8 ~.5 e; § "'8 ¡;: i1 "'::E ~ ]o¿ g
- .~ oj -- ~O'"
Q ~ ~~ ~ "'~ 8 .~ "€ oj oj ~"'".'" -
';}."" -t' ~ 1j '" ~ ~ I ~ ~ Zo ~ ~ ::.@¡ ~ e; ~ ~
^ <=i '" ."" '" "', ,., o."" ...... '" '" ..r <=i .-
~ oj '¡;¡ -:s!-¡¡¡"€ -- """u óo~~ o~tt;o::E
~ '" ~ g",~o 0 ~"õ "€¡;¡.... ."".",,~~ ~::;.¡::-
~ . O'~~ <=i õ"" o;:;°.¡g~~~~ ~~~~ §
.... oj o¿ß""""....Ë <=i1jt"""""."., êt"o¿ 0
~ 0 ~ ~",t ~",o~ ~ 00 i28>~~~~ ~::;~oj ~
'26'" oj8] 8'[:0':;.g 1()~~¡:¡¡8è;>88"" .",,~~,~ '"
~ ",.5 ~"", 00-5,., 0 "'¡(J~en"'.-'-'-OOoj"',~";: :> '"
;" '" "'-- <=ioj 0 -,.,-"'~oj<=i¡::;¡::; ",oj-~ .-
~ ~ ~ t::Eo ~~oj- ¡::jj§-"'~j"""ææ~~O",4-<~<=i ~
.~ ~ ,.; 3'<t'("') -()~o 1"..o:..o~....¡-£8UU()(),9<.g~""~:Q
= - "'N '" "'0 oj_t::~ """ 0 . """.""
~ ~ ~ ~'<t"" ~~~~ ~8z~8~~§~~~~~ð~žæ ~
Q)
¡::.:::
~ = -= -==- ---- -- ---= -=----
0 - - --- ---- ------- ---- ------
~
~ 0 - N
Z ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~SSS
~ 0
- = .....
0 '8...' ...?->
,g oq = (i '" æ
u ~ ~ ~ ". ¡:: '"
"'(i .s = 0 0;> ;$ ~
~'C """S 5b~~~... '" 0 '" U
""" = ",...>""".S '-,J "',~::: ;> '"
.--¡;; """"""""'" "';9 ¡;:t: .~ =
5 e j ~ ~§~;9'a~B~'" .2& fi -¡;;a ~
"'..... ""'" '--¡;;"""v;:Eg¡ >0... '" '"
,~..§ 15'.~ O.S ~ .s ~.2 1S 0 '" å!5. ~ ~] ::!!:
~ "" '" ~"~...~~","'" ~ (i ¿ """
= ~ ...0 ~ ,S.t3 ¡:¡~'v;'¡¡;.<;:::!J ~.8'u 0 ~ ~ ~
0': -= ",'~'~"'p' - ...';:: '"
",';:: '" ~ "'ê~8S;>=.0 ]8"'" '" o~
8.~ H;¡:J ~o~'v;~bo~ ~~e '~E B ",'v;
~ n ~ § ~u.....~>.§~t o=~.- e-¡;;e
..... '" '" 0 ,.~§""':Eu~ ""'",u = 0 go
~ :g ~ ~ ~ ~g~~~",~~ ~b~ ~ ~]~
::::: ",' '¡¡; (i '" g",¡)=8",8!J'~ S""" '" § .~
<2 ;:õ >. 'c ~ u~'~""'gJ.8S... a"Òì---'~ ~ ~.2
",' 'v; := ~ .~ "§ u .~..§ tJ '" 8 0 ,. § ~,. 0 gp "'¡) 's ~
'" ~ ,38 = ~i2"""iJ"'¡)~¡;: €B>."'-è 's"'gp~,,?
e "" <$:I ..... .- ...0 .~",:>§..., ,,~,,-'" ~'¡¡;'St>IQ
.8 ¡q 4-< g oE '3g~'S~~..."'S ~'¡¡;~'IIop, tJ""""'u
..... ... 0 ~ ..... i",'¡¡;~"'¡)"'t;¡ (i gJige "'~~~~
~ ,. t;¡ ~ 0 """õ",~Z,,"8 ""'~e~"" ~tJ~E-
u ¡;: ..2 S =. :;2go~8.s=u ..s.....¡:Q...~ ..â"~.~-¡;;
.;¡!, '" u 'u i2 ::I~~'v;-,,! '" oS ... =,..... ""~ ,~-s.= '" ""
i ¡ ~ 'R " i~~o,,"u~"d ~o~~... n~u:gJ
8 8 ~ '" 8 ",.....=~~g",b"""",~~~u ",>.'R"'...
- '" 0 .....=0""'=b~8"'u~",;>.", ",~",;:J.
~ ~ ~ g¡i~ ~~"'¡)§'SiJ~e~~'~~~,gp~ ::I15'M.....i
~ ... .~ ~'v;i ~~~=~~""'~.s~~~a~ ¡=~~'v;
] ¡ j gJ 19Js ~~~!~~~ig~~'~!bi ~~~~gJ
~ ~ t;¡ ~ ~~~ ËË~~gpË;:;S~~];:;S-¡;;"~'¡¡; ~&~:~
.5 = "" - ._=~ """~""""'~"""u05§=",~~"",,~=
.... 0""" " "'0= """""'-"""'=:0="" ~""'~'-"""~"'~t-O
§ ~ '8 ~ ~.9 ] ~.~ ,.,. ~ ~ '~ -< gj¡:.::: ~ ~ ¡g ,. !J'~ § ~ ""] 'v; ;:1¡ iJ
u ~g~""" ~"'~ ~~t:o.tJ",~",t;¡~ße~¡::n",~§""'Z-,,,
en u...-""" """u """ ~""".<;:::"'g""o"",,=......_,,,;>........
~ r/)~~~;:J ¡:Q~r/) r/)r/)z,,;:Jr/)r/)Ü_r/)Ur/)¡:Q_O,=r/)~f-o-<~
Q)
S >.
en ~ "
~ -S ~
~ ¡o. ~ i
<t: ~ 8' ." Æ
:9.~ g. § .~ ~
Q)'" tJ ",'.....;> =
.- ~ ="'" '" ',""1 ro
~~ ¡,Li:.§ g'~", = ... 0
=::s ~ U ~õ~ .9", '" t;¡ ¡,Li- '~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~i B t ~gJ ~
Q. z = '3"5" z" 0 § 0 c.¡¡; ,.
,-., ~ ~ ...>.0 ~r/)" ~z ;:;s '" !J ¡;]'" U
en - ~ ag",~....¡ g~ 0 ~ a -~ N
~ iJ ::r: iJJ:¡'~ -¡;;:ËiJ ....¡g i ~ 0 rot> 8
~ fi ~ ut;¡o ~ '" ~~ § 0 ~ b: -
;-;; ::so ~~, ",§ì ""c"" ...0 = 'V; a",--
- =- "',~"'... '" '" 0 0--
en r/) 's.~r/) e =~ u.'" SO 8 u;;:... -¡;; u ê'- '"
'ã .§ § '§š"~ ~~§~'~ 8~~ ~o~"'¡)¡o. ~;z:§~
0 :> 0 f-ob,; ~B",""¡~ uiJ~ ...~~",¡;: ",¡,Li'"
.~ ~ .~O= ~~;>-¡;;..;- "'UU =ONg~... ..ga..~~
~ "" ",,"4-<C ~-<-~ ~ " .9 ... ~a..Uo
~ 8 b 80'" ;:;S"'U~~ ~~¡,Li -¡;;~~¡:Q~~ o~ob
~ >. ;> >.",c IQ~"::SO """,0 UIQa..a....;- Ot-o-
~ _0 ~ -O~- IQ;>9~~ Zo~~ ~IQIQ";-~o= "'a..-~
.~ r/) ",r/) ..;-r/)--", ~..;- _-NN'" -10--
Õ
~ ~
~ - - ::::: - _:::::::::: ~- --- - --
0 - - - - - --- --- ....¡----- ----
~
~ ~ ..;- '" 10 t-~a.. O-N B~..;-"'IOt- ~a..o-
Z S S S S sss ~-- ~~~~-- ~~NN
.,;
, "
,.,."0
- "
~ 1:j
{j "
.- ..0
~ ~
0 S
~d
.¡:¡ -E
..<:: '"
.9 ~
,.,. '"
- 0
"'-
f;: g
~ "
.- ;::,
'" õ3 .
lJf;:"8
~ gp.8
1:j:5..8
"O,S"<::
'" ~,~
~...,1:j
0 § OJ)
:\'0 I-< .S
"0<2"0
"þ§
".~ 0
-Eu!3
~ g..s ~
..o-~"<::
.~ ~ g ";;
0 ¡¡¡ ..<:: .-
Q.. ~ ~ ~
~ ..<:: g -å
....< " gp -:::; u
13 ¡:¡ ,~ ..<:: "
.~ ..<:: Q.. u -E
t) r:: .& § '"
¡;!,.,..þ~"Ei
Q..- '" "
¡(j ~"Ei 3.5
...,{j ~OP..
~ .¡¡; ~ lJ S
4!. "0 Q.. ~ 8
'1':.§ B.S d
~lJ""'ã3;S
.- '" õ3 ¡g "'¡)
~ " f;: '" ::::
,~ .g ~ '" '"
~ ,S'¡¡; 1j ~
.2~BB..9
0 '" '" 0
JšSlJ¡f~
¡(j t: g 3 "ô
.'" ~ ;;;; üj .2
~ ~ §'-I:::i
z2;Sg¡g
"0"01-< ..<::
§ § ~ " ~
..-g-g~~~
'" Q.. Q..'- " '"
S88-g-E~
.s '" '" Q.. " 3
::;¡;í:î:í:î::::::!JÜ;
I-<
~ . . . . .
"
~
~
~ - r...o
~ ~..
z ~ ~ ~
... ,.. --, r"",
- - ~ '-.-1
0 ,:= Z
> :...-
Q ~
:_~ .c 0 C)U
";: ~ r- J:
..... - c.. f'.
»,'. '", >< C) ~ ~ N
,r¡' W c:: "0,1:...
. :,' ;~. - c.. 0') ..
.~ 1;) « C) Q)
.- Q) (/)
>< ~ ~
W J:
c..
r---
..., ~
ø M
Q) . .
~ ø
"tj ...,
Cj (j) v
ø 0
..., N V Z
.- ~
.- -
..0 tV C'tj
.- ~ c
.c ..... ~
X r- C'tj M
-
U.l C) CC ~
U . .
~
0
~
M
n
I
RESOLUTION NO. -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
IMPLEMENT A PILOT PROJECT TO DEVELOP A
RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR REGULATING THE
PLACEMENT OF UTILITY BOXES PLACED IN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO REPLACE APPROXIMATELY 180
EXISTING POWER SUPPLIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-
OF-WAY WITH APPROXIMATELY 90 POWER SUPPLIES IN
COOPERATION WITH COX COMMUNICATIONS AS PART OF
THE PILOT
WHEREAS, Cox Communications is proposing to install 90 to
120 "Network Reliability Units" or "NRU's" in the next six months;
and
WHEREAS, before Cox Communications can offer telephone
service, they must increase the reliability of the system and
provide a redundant back up system that is capable of powering
telephone transmission in case of a power failure; and
WHEREAS, Cox Communications proposes to replace
approximately 180 existing, single cabinet power units in the
public right-of-way with approximately 90 new two cabinet systems;
and
WHEREAS, due to the number of units to be installed, the
size of the units, and staff's expectation that the number of
utility installations in the right-of-way may increase
substantially over the next few years, staff is recommending that
a pilot program be authorized which will establish uniform
standards for staff level permitting of multiple, large utility box
facilities that are placed above ground in the public right-of-way;
and
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Coordinator has
determined that the pilot Program and the NRU roll-out is exempt
from CEQA pursuant to Categorical Exemption 15303 Class 3(d), and
a Notice of Exemption thereon was filed with the County Clerk on
January 7, 2000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista does hereby authorize the city Manager (1) to
implement a pilot Project to develop a recommended standard for
regulating the placement of utility boxes placed in the public
right-of-way, as set forth in Attachment A; and (2) to process the
Cox Communications NRU installation plan under the pilot Program.
1
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff is authorized and
directed to return to Council with a recommendation for an
ordinance that would update the specifications for placing utility
boxes, pedestals or other equipment above ground in the public
right-of-way.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Michael Meacham, Special
Projects Manager
H, Ihomelattorneylreaolpilotbox, cox
2
7
Submitta] Requirements: (ATTACHMENT A)
A party seeking to obtain approval of one or more Special Utility Facilities (SUF's) shall be
required to submit the following to the City Engineer:
8 A completed City form application. Only one application needs to be submitted for one or more
uniform SUF's with common function and exterior design. Up to ten (10) SUF's may be
processed on anyone application.
8 A site plan showing the location of each proposed unit, its pertinent dimensions, location and a
facsimile of the unit in the context of surrounding properties with applicant's proposed
screening if any is warranted. When warranted, the site plan shall include a description of
proposed plantings and irrigation plans and a maintenance schedule.
8 Testing shall be scheduled in a manner to minimize any noise impact on the surrounding
neighborhood. Testing shall occur between the hours of9 a.m. and 6 p.m. unless alternate hours
are requested by neighboring residents.
8 The appJicable fees for each level of processing the application. Fees shall either be based on a
fixed fee or time and materials basis with a deposit/draw-down or pay as you go system. Staff
currently estimates the fixed fee per SUF cost to be $750. The City shall exercise best efforts to
process each package of up to ten SUF's within 15 days ofreceiving complete applications.
General Conditions - All SUF's shaH be subject to the foHowing General Conditions:
I. Concrete pads for the structure shaH be level with the existing sidewalk.
2. Raised pads shaH be spaced as to not impede pedestrian traffic or cause a tripping hazard.
3. Units shall not be located in the parkway adjacent to a curb and gutter.
4. Proper visual sight distance must be maintained in accordance with aH City standards at aH
intersections and driveways.
5. Proposed placements shaH not interfere with pedestrian or other sidewalk traffic, or the use and
operation ofpubJic facilities in the right of way (e.g. fire hydrants).
6. Sidewalks, pavements and other improvements damaged or disturbed during instaHation,
maintenance or removal of an SUF shall be restored to original condition.
7. Traffic control plans shall be submitted for City Engineer approval forty-eight (48) hours prior
to commencing construction, servicing or performing maintenance unless an emergency
necessitates immediate repair work be performed.
8. Graffiti resistant surfaces shaH be used. The SUF owner shall survey SUF's for graffiti as a part
of routine field operations but no less frequently than every (30) thirty days. All graffiti noted
by or reported to a SUF owner must be removed thereby within three business days.
9. The location, design and required screening (see Special Conditions, below) shall be compatible
with the character of the surrounding neighborhood.
10. Where screening requirements include plant material the City shaH require a short-term
maintenance plan and/or agreement sufficient to aHow plant material to be self-sustaining.
11. Each proposed instaHation shaH conform to aH applicable laws including without limitation the
Americans with Disabilities Act and the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Chapter 12.20
requirements for bonding, insurance, and construction standards shaH a]so apply.
Page 2: (Attachment A)
Special Conditions:
Subject to the General Conditions, above, each SUF shall also comply with the following set of
applicable Special Conditions:
Level I - Primary Residential
Description: Residential and Collector III streets where the proposed SUF would be visible from
either inside a residentia] dwelling or from a front yard at a point twenty feet back from the curb
line or further.
Process:
1. Submittal of Application.
2. Coordinated Site Visit with City and applicant staff.
3. Notice to adjoining residents and residential dwelling units directly across the street
(approximately ISO feet).
4. Administrative hearing to consider/address neighborhood concerns if any.
5. Appeal right (for applicant and resident) to City Manager.
6. Issuance of approval letter with conditions.
Standards:
1. Site plan to include substantial screening on at least three sides and on aU sides in highly
visible area.
2. Screening to be at least equal to the height of the unit.
3. Preferable screening to consist of plant material.
4. Alternate screening may include slope, waUs, decorative block, fencing, or ornamental
"architectural" structures and complementary paint color as appropriate for the
surrounding neighborhood.
5. City may require the applicant to underground SUF's in proposed level I locations that
are highly visible and present significant potential visual impacts.
Level II- Secondary Residential
Description: Residential and CoUector I and II streets where the proposed SUF would not be visible
from the front of a detached single-family residential dwelling.
Process:
1. Submittal of Application.
2. Coordinated Site Visit with City and applicant staff.
3. Notice the property owner(s) immediately adjacent the pubJic right-of-way.
4. Administrative hearing when applicable to consider/address neighborhood concerns.
5. Issuance of approval letter with conditions.
Standards:
1. Site Plan to include existing screening, or provide adequate additional screening on up to
three sides as may be required by the City.
2. Provide plant material, waUs, decorative block, fencing, or ornamental "architectural"
structures and complementary paint color acceptable to the City as screening.
3. Screening alternatives may be proposed by applicant and win be considered by the City
where applicant demonstrates their effectiveness to the satisfaction of the City.
4. Where site selection and other site characteristics substantially mitigate visual impacts,
the City may elect not to require the installation of landscape or structural screening
materials.
Level III Commercial-Industrial
Description: Commercia!, ]ndustrial and Major Arterials where the proposed SUF would not be
visible from a residential dwelling.
Process:
I. Submittal of Application.
2. Coordinated Site Visit with City and applicant staff.
3. Notice to adjacent property owners if City determines that the potential impacts warrant
such notice.
4. Issuance of approval letter with conditions.
Standards:
I. Supplemental screening may be limited to that provided by similar structures in the
immediate area, or to that needed to complement the surrounding land uses.
2. Where site selection and other site characteristics substantially mitigate visua! impacts, the
City may elect not to require the installation of landscape or structura! screening materials.
City Manager Modifications:
The City Manager shall have the authority to waive one or more conditions, or to apply additional
conditions, upon demonstration of special circumstances.
"OINT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCy/CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM No. ~
MEETING DATE 02/22/00
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION WAIVING THE FORMAL BID REQUIREMENTS AND
AWARDING A PURCHASE AGREEMENT IN A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF
$115,000 TO SAFEWAY SIGNS FOR THE MANUFACTURE AND
INSTALLATION OF CALTRANS SIGNS FOR MAIN STREET AND AUTO PARK
DRIVE
SUBMITTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR uI- ~ t.s
REVIEWED BY: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ~;zI (4/STH8 VOTE: YES..lL- No-->
On October 5, 1999 the City Council and Redevelopment Agency approved changing the name of Otay Valley Road
to Main Street from west of Interstate 805 east to SR 125, with an overlay of Auto Park Drive from Interstate 805 east
to Brandywine. The portion of Otay Valley Road from where it turns south to the City boundary was renamed
Heritage Road, The estimated cost to implement the name change including CAL TRANS and new City signs was
$141,000 which was appropriated from the Otay Valley Road project fund at that time,
Staff has been working with CAL TRANS to have the new freeway signs installed, The goal is to have the signs
installed by mid-April 2000. CAL TRANS utiiizes Safeway Sign Company as their sole vendor for the manufacturing of
CAL TRANS signs, The City of Chula Vista received a cost estimate from Safewa"y Signs to manufacture and install
the new signs for $115,000, City staff is designing and permitting the signs, so the overall cost was reduced by
$30,000, Staff is recommending that the Council/Agency approve the purchase agreement with Safeway Sign
Company in a not to exceed amount of $115,000,
That the City Council and Redevelopment Agency approve waiving the formal bid requirements and awarding a
purchase agreement in a not to exceed amount of $115,000 to Safeway Sign Company to manufacture and install
the CAL TRANS signs.
Not applicabie.
As mentioned, the Council/Agency approved, in October 1999, the name change of Otay Valley Road to Main Street
with an overlay of Auto Park Drive from 1,805 east to Brandywine, By creating the overlay of Auto Park Drive,
02 -I
PAGE 2, ITEM ~
MEETING DATE 02/22/00
CAL TRANS signs will include "Auto Park Drive' for several miles north and south of the Main Street exit. This
improved identification is expected to assist the Auto Park to expand and increase sales.
Staff has been working with CAL TRANS to obtain an encroachment permit in order to implement the name change
which will involve replacing 9 CAL TRANS signs, 4 "Amphitheater" directional signs to include "Soak City USA', and
42 City street signs.
Council/Agency approved an appropriation of $141,000 from the available fund balance of the Otay Valley Road
project fund to pay for the new signs, It was determined that the use of Agency funds is of benefit to the project area
and is consistent with the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment and Implementation Plans, The project and will assist in
the elimination of blight by reducing confusion due to the several roads in the area with the name 'Otay'; encouraging
attraction of new consumers and new businesses to the area; fostering the expansion of existing businesses; and
that no other reasonable means of financing was available for the project.
Safeway Sign Company is the sole vendor for CAL TRANS to manufacture CAL TRANS signs, In addition,
CAL TRANS utilizes Safeway's services to install the signs to simplify the bidding process and to ensure quality
control. Staff received a cost estimate from SAFEWAY Sign Company for $115,000 for the design, permitting,
manufacture and installation of the new CAL TRANS signs, City staff is designing and permitting the signs resulting
in a $30,000 savings in the cost. Staff is recommending a not to exceed amount of $115,000 which will include the
manufacture and installation of the signs, quality control, inspection, Safeway's encroachment permit, performance
and payment bonds, and liability insurance, The final form of the purchase agreement will be approved by the
Purchasing Agent and the City Attomey before the Mayor's signature, The project is scheduled to be complete by
April 15, 2000.
The Safeway Sign purchase agreement is a not to exceed amount of $115,000. The funds have been appropriated
from the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment project fund,
[DDA) H:IHOMEICDMMOEVISTAfF,REP\D2\22\DDlDTVRNAME.CHG [F,'maIY 16. 2000 111:45AMII
Q2-cJ..
AGENCY RESOLUTION NO,
AND
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO,
JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
WAIVING THE FORMAL BID REQUIREMENTS AND AWARDING A
PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO SAFEWAY SIGNS FOR THE
MANUFACTURE AND INSTALLATION OF CALTRANS SIGNS FOR
MAIN STREET AND AUTO PARK DRIVE
WHEREAS, on October 5, 1999 the City Council and Redevelopment Agency approved
changing the name of Otay Valley Road to Main Street from west of Interstate 805 east to SR 125,
with an overlay of Auto Park Drive from Interstate 805 east to Brandywine, .
WHEREAS, the funds to implement the name change were appropriated from the Otay
Valley Road project fund; and
WHEREAS, at that time the City and Agency found and determined (1) that the use of
Agency funds is of benefit to the project area and will assist in the elimination of blight by reducing
confusion due to the several roads in the area with the name "Otay" encouraging attraction of new
consumers and new businesses to the area, and fostering the expansion of existing business; (2)
that the project is consistent with the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment and Implementation Plans;
and (3) that no other reasonable means of financing was available for the project; and
WHEREAS, CAL TRANS utilizes Safeway Sign Company as their sole vendor for the
manufacturing of CAL TRANS signs as such the City wishes to waive the formal bid requirements
and award a purchase agreement to Safeway Signs for the manufacture and installation of the
CAL TRANS signs for Main Street and Auto Park Drive; and
WHEREAS, Safeway Signs has provided a bid for $115,000 to manufacture and install 13
signs;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council and Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Chula Vista do hereby waive the formal bid requirements based on the facts set forth
above; award a purchase agreement to Safeway Signs for the manufacture and installation of
CALTRANS signs for Main Street and Auto Park Drive in an amount not to exceed $115,000; and
authorize the Mayor to execute the purchase agreement in a final form approved by the Purchasing
Agent and the City Attorney.
Presented by Approved as to form by
(ÙL ~/
Chris Salomone
Director of Community Development
HIIHOME\COMMOEVlRESOSlsafeway signs,doc
02-3