HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-01-08 TSC Agenda Packet
Date:Thursday, January 8, 2026
Time:6:00 p.m.
Location:Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA
Traffic Safety Commission Regular Meeting
______________________________________________________________________________
In-Person Public Comments: Join us for the Traffic Safety Commission meeting at the time and
location specified on this agenda to make your comments. Each person will be allotted three minutes
to address the Commission, unless otherwise adjusted by the presiding officer.
Electronic Public Comments: At www.chulavistaca.gov/boardmeetings, locate this meeting and click
on the comment bubble icon. Select the item and click on "Leave Comment." The deadline to submit
e-comments or any comments emailed to TSC@chulavistaca.gov will be noon on the day of the
meeting.
Accessibility: Individuals with disabilities are invited to request modifications or accommodations in
order to access and/or participate in a Traffic Safety Commission meeting by contacting the
commission staff at TSC@chulavistaca.gov (California Relay Service is available for the hearing
impaired by dialing 711) at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting.
Pages
1.CALL TO ORDER
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.ROLL CALL
Commissioners Becerra Firsht, Caudillo, DeMarco, Galicia, Luke, Marroquin, and
Chair Orso-Delgado
4.PUBLIC COMMENTS
The public may address the Commission on any subject matter within the
Commission’s jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law
generally prohibits the Commission from discussing or taking action on any issue
not included on the agenda. The Commission may schedule the topic for future
discussion or refer the matter to staff.
5.ACTION ITEMS
Action items are considered individually by the Commission and are expected to
elicit discussion and deliberation.
5.1 RESOLUTION OF THE TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND CITY COUNCIL
POLICY NO. 576-16 “INSTALLATION OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS”
4
Staff Recommendation: Commission adopt resolution.
6.PRESENTATIONS
The following item(s) will be presentations given to the Commission. Action on
these item(s) is typically limited to the Commission receiving the presentation and
providing direction or feedback to staff, as appropriate.
6.1 PURVIEW OF THE TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 18
Staff Recommendation: Commission hear the presentation.
6.2 POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC COLLISIONS/CITATIONS UPDATE 24
Staff Recommendation: Commission hear the presentation.
6.3 BIKEWAYS AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES CIP PROJECT UPDATE 28
Staff Recommendation: Commission hear the presentation.
7.OTHER BUSINESS
7.1 Election of Chair and Vice Chair
8.STAFF COMMENTS
9.COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 2 of 40
10.ADJOURNMENT
to the regular meeting on February 12, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.
Materials provided to the Traffic Safety Commission related to any open-session
item on this agenda are available for public review by contacting the Engineering
Department at TSC@chulavistaca.gov.
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 3 of 40
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Item 5.1 Meeting Date 1/8/2026
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION OF THE TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMEND CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 576-16 “INSTALLATION OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS”
SUBMITTED BY: City Traffic Engineer
As part of its ongoing operational activities, Traffic Engineering staff conducted a comprehensive review of the City’s existing City Council policy regarding Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks
#576-16 that was adopted in 1978 (the “Policy”). Staff is proposing a comprehensive update to the Policy to address newer t raffic control and pedestrian access standards, technologies, and modal shift priorities that make it better align with more recent policies such as the Complete Streets Policy.
RECOMMENDATION That the Traffic Safety Commission adopt the resolution recommending City Council amend the Policy.
DISCUSSION
The existing Policy was approved in April 1978, when Chula Vista’s population was nearly 76,000 people, there were no disabled pedestrian access standards, curb ramps, or pedestrian-activated flashing beacon crossings, and the primary motivation in the field of Traffic Engineering was
conveying the most passenger vehicles with minimal delay while accommodating pedestrians
where they would minimally impact drivers. Since that time, Chula Vista has far more than tripled in size, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Public Right of Way Access Guidelines (PROWAG) have be come standards for pedestrian access, and focus has shifted from solely conveying passenger vehicles to providing infrastructure and traffic control measures for all
transportation modes including pedestrians. Staff is presenting a comprehensive update to the
Policy to guide future crosswalk installation decisions.
The existing Policy provided warrant criteria for the installation of an uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk using the following factors as criteria:
1.Pedestrian Volume – how many pedestrians are observed crossing during the peak hour
2.“General Conditions” – site-specific conditions that would support pedestrian crossingsuch as helping with pedestrian navigation, directing pedestrians to shorter crossingdistances, improving visibility of pedestrians, and limiting pedestrian exposure to vehicles.3.Gap Time – How many gaps between vehicles are sufficiently large for a pedestrian to
cross without conflicting with a passing vehicle in an average five-minute period.
01/08/2026 TSC 4 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 1/8/20
The proposed Policy preserves the point-based criteria and some of the existing factors, but updates
point weights and site conditions criteria to reflect current standards for pedestrian traffic control and right-of-way. The proposed Policy begins with screening criteria that are primarily relevant to mid-block conditions, but can be applicable to any uncontrolled crossing. The screening criteria are:
• Do at least 5 pedestrians cross the location during the peak hour or does it serve a major pedestrian generator?
• Is the crossing at least 300 feet from the nearest pedestrian crossing?
• Is the prevailing speed of vehicles less than 40 mph?
• Is there a sight distance of at least 10 times the speed limit or will it be improved? The proposed Policy then introduces the points criteria similar to the existing policy, evaluating
the following factors: 1. Pedestrian Volume – similar to existing Policy 2. Pedestrian Setting/Generators – whether the crossing connecting pedestrian generators or dedicated pedestrian pathways 3. General Factors – site-specific factors of the crossing such as distance to the nearest
controlled crossing, pedestrian visibility to motorists, proximity to a transit stop, the road being crossed is lower volume and speed. 4. Gap Time – similar to existing Policy In addition to the warrant criteria, the proposed Policy provides guidance for appropriate
crossing treatments at a warranted crossing based on vehicular volume, crossing distance, and prevailing vehicular speeds. Depending on the combination of these factors, crossing treatments may range from a marked crosswalk with standard signage to a crosswalk with signage and rectangular rapid flashing beacons or a pedestrian hybrid beacon crossing.
The updated criteria in the proposed Policy equip staff with updated standards for implementing pedestrian crossings and appropriate crossing treatments using established methods that efficiently determine how to address a request for an uncontrolled pedestrian crossing using modern criteria and crossing treatments.
FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact of this item.
Attachments:
1. Existing City Council Policy 576-16 2. Proposed Amendment to City Council Policy 576-16
01/08/2026 TSC 5 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 6 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 7 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 8 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 9 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
CITY COUNCIL POLICIES
POLICY NAME:POLICY NUMBER:
Effective Date: Last Revised Date: Status:Page:
I. BACKGROUND
Per California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 275, a crosswalk is defined as either that portion of a roadway included
within the prolongation or connection of the boundary lines of sidewalks at intersections where the intersecting
roadways meet at approximately right angles, except the prolongation of such lines from an alley across a street or any
portion of a roadway distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface. Crosswalks
can be categorized as either marked or unmarked. Marked crosswalks are delineated by white or yellow painted
markings placed on the pavement that extend from curb to curb. Crosswalks without white or yellow painted markings
on the pavement are considered as unmarked crosswalks. Pedestrians have the right-of-way in both marked and
unmarked crosswalks.
Crosswalks function to connect pedestrians through a network of sidewalks. Marked crosswalks are typically placed
at intersections where there is substantial conflict between pedestrians and vehicles, where there is significant
pedestrian activity, and/or where traffic movements are controlled, such as all-way stop-controlled intersections and
signalized intersections. Marked crosswalks serve the purpose of guiding pedestrians onto the suggested path,
encouraging pedestrians to use a particular crossing.
To enhance pedestrian safety, California enacted the “Daylighting Law” via Assembly Bill 413 (AB 413) which
became effective in January 2025. This new state law made it illegal to park within 20 feet of the vehicle approach
side of any marked or unmarked crosswalk, regardless of whether red curbs or signage is posted. As a result, CVC
22500 (n) prohibits stopping, parking, or leave standing any vehicle within 20 feet of the vehicle approach side of any
marked or unmarked crosswalks or within 15 feet of any crosswalks with curb extension. It is important to note that
the City of Chula Vista already had a similar law in place under Municipal Code Section 10.52.070.
The City’s original “Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks” Council Policy was adopted on April 25, 1978 per Council
Resolution No. 9086. This latest revision to the City’s “Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks” policy was developed
to provide a methodology that is representative of current best practices that have been implemented in the San Diego
region and elsewhere, but suited to the context of Chula Vista. In addition, this revised policy considers several factors
and criteria described in the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at
Uncontrolled Crossing Locations which provides guidance on the use of various pedestrian-related safety measures,
such as uncontrolled crossings, crosswalk visibility enhancements, pedestrian refuge islands, rectangular rapid
flashing beacons, pedestrian hybrid beacons, and other measures.
01/08/2026 TSC 10 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
CITY COUNCIL POLICIES
POLICY NAME:POLICY NUMBER:
Effective Date: Last Revised Date: Status:Page:
II. PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to establish minimum criteria for the installation of pedestrian crosswalks between
intersections or at intersections that are not controlled by stop signs or traffic signals and provide guidance for
crosswalk treatments based on roadway conditions.
III. POLICY
Staff shall conduct the following analysis in order to determine whether installation of a marked crosswalk is warranted
at a given location. If a location being considered for installation of a marked crosswalk does not meet the criteria of this policy, the City Traffic Engineer or designee may exercise engineering judgment in determining whether a marked crosswalk is necessary or appropriate at that location.
STEP 1: BASIC SCREENING CRITERIA EVALUATION
The following basic screening criteria are evaluated to determine if a proposed crosswalk location is suitable for further
evaluation:
• Pedestrian Demand: Is the pedestrian volume at the proposed crosswalk equal to 5 pedestrians1 or more per
hour during the peak pedestrian hour? If “No”, is the proposed crosswalk on a direct route to or from a
pedestrian generator, such as a school, library, senior center, shopping center, park, or employment center?
• Distance to Nearest Controlled Crossing: Is the proposed crosswalk location farther than 300 feet from the
nearest controlled pedestrian crossing2 (measured from the nearest edge of the proposed marked crosswalk
to the closest edge of the controlled crossing)?
• Approach Speed: Is the 85th percentile approach speed of the roadway that the proposed crosswalk would
traverse less than 40 mph3?
1 The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) addresses mid-block crossings for signalization using 20 persons per hour demand as the lowest threshold for pedestrian hybrid beacon installation on higher speed roadways. However, existing volume of pedestrian demand is difficult to assess in the absence of a crossing; therefore, observed existing crossing demand of five pedestrians per hour is appropriate for an unmarked and uncontrolled location for consideration of a marked crosswalk.
2 Per the CAMUTCD, midblock crossings should not be signalized if located within 300 feet of another traffic control signal unless the new signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. 3 Per the CAMUTCD, midblock crosswalks shall not be installed if posted speed limits exceed 40 mph.
01/08/2026 TSC 11 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
CITY COUNCIL POLICIES
POLICY NAME:POLICY NUMBER:
Effective Date: Last Revised Date: Status:Page:
• Sight Distance: Does the proposed crosswalk location have a sight distance (in feet) that is greater than 10
times the posted speed limit (in mph)4 or will the sight distance be improved prior to installation of the
crosswalk?
STEP 2: POINT SYSTEM EVALUATION
If all basic screening criteria are satisfied (i.e., answered as “Yes”), then the proposed crosswalk shall be evaluated
based on a point system, utilizing the following four warrant categories:
1. Pedestrian Volume – Assigns points based on the number of pedestrian crossings in a peak hour at the
proposed crosswalk
2. Pedestrian Setting/Generators – Assigns points based on where the proposed crosswalk is located relative to
pedestrian paths and land uses
3. General Factors – Assigns points based on various factors such as distance to nearest controlled crossing and
vehicle volume
4. Gap Time – Assigns points based on the average number of adequate gaps in vehicle traffic at the proposed
crosswalk
Table 1 presents the point system scoring evaluation, noting the point value to be awarded by each question within
the warrant categories. The point system includes a combination of “Yes/No” questions and data-related questions.
In order for a location to satisfy the point system warrant evaluation, a threshold of 24 points must be achieved, which
equates to 48% of the possible 50 points.
STEP 3: CROSSWALK TREATMENT EVALUATION
If the proposed crossing location meets both the Basic Screening and Point System warrants, then the most appropriate
crossing treatments to be installed with the marked crosswalk are evaluated. The crossing treatments are based on:
1. Roadway Average Daily Traffic (ADT);
2. Roadway Configuration; and
3. Roadway Speed Limit.
Table 2 presents thresholds for identifying supplemental crossing treatments to be considered with the installation of
new marked crosswalks.
4 Per the CAMUTCD, sight distance in feet is 10 times the posted speed limit in miles per hour.
01/08/2026 TSC 12 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
CITY COUNCIL POLICIES
POLICY NAME:POLICY NUMBER:
Effective Date: Last Revised Date: Status:Page:
The installation of any supplemental traffic control devices at a proposed uncontrolled crossing meeting both the Basic
Screening and Point System warrants will be as determined by the City Traffic Engineer or designee.
01/08/2026 TSC 13 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
CITY COUNCIL POLICIES
POLICY NAME:POLICY NUMBER:
Effective Date: Last Revised Date: Status:Page:
Table 1: Marked Crosswalk Point System Evaluation
01/08/2026 TSC 14 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
CITY COUNCIL POLICIES
POLICY NAME:POLICY NUMBER:
Effective Date: Last Revised Date: Status:Page:
Table 2: Crosswalk Treatment Screening
01/08/2026 TSC 15 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
CITY COUNCIL POLICIES
POLICY NAME:POLICY NUMBER:
Effective Date: Last Revised Date: Status:Page:
HISTORY DATE ACTION RESOLUTION NO.
01/08/2026 TSC 16 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
RESOLUTION NO. SC-2026-_____
RESOLUTION OF THE TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMEND CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 576-16 “INSTALLATION OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS”
WHEREAS, on April 25, 1978, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 9086 that established City Council Policy No. 576-16 “Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks” (“Policy”); and
WHEREAS, the new federal and City standards have been adopted and new pedestrian crossing treatments have been developed subsequent to the Policy that reflect evolving priorities since the initial adoption of the Policy; and
WHEREAS, Chula Vista’s population has more than tripled since adoption of the Policy and its roadway network has grown correspondingly; and WHEREAS, as part of its routine operational activities, Traffic Engineering staff determined that an amendment to the Policy to reflect current transportation priorities,
technologies, and standards would be appropriate to inform future evaluations and procured the services of a consultant to prepare said amended Policy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Traffic Safety Commission of the City
of Chula Vista does hereby recommend that the City Council amend the Policy in accordance
with staff’s recommendation. ACTION by the Traffic Safety Commission of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 8th day of January 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NAYS: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners:
____________________________________ Pedro Orso-Delgado, Chair
ATTEST: ______________________________________
Florence Picardal, Secretary
01/08/2026 TSC 17 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 18 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Traffic Safety Commission
TSC’s Role and Authority
City Engineer presents traffic control measures for TSC
consideration and approval (10.04.030.A; 10.12.020.A)
If TSC objects to proposed action, the matter is referred to
Council for final decision (10.04.030.A; 2.44.020)
TSC can recommend to City Engineer proposed traffic control
measures for consideration (10.04.030.A)
TSC cannot initiate or order implementation of a measure
(10.04.030.B)
If City Engineer declines recommended measure, TSC can refer
matter to Council with majority vote (10.04.030.A; 2.44.020)
TSC and City Engineer must adhere to Vehicle Code, MUTCD, and established Council Policies (10.04.030.C,D)
If a request is contrary to Vehicle Code, MUTCD, and/or established Council Policies after analysis, Staff denies
without referral to TSC (10.04.030.C,D; 10.12.020.B)
01/08/2026 TSC 19 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Traffic Safety Commission
City Council Reserved
Authority
Traffic control measures included in capital improvement projects (10.04.030.G.1)
Road closures, One-way Designations (10.04.030.G.2)
Traffic control measures affecting businesses including
angle parking and street parking in business districts
(10.04.030.G.3)
Parking regulations on private property (10.04.030.G.4)
Amending authority of City Engineer (10.04.030.G.5)
Setting parking meter zones and fees (10.04.030.G.6)
Setting speed limits (10.04.030.G.7)
Staff presents these items to TSC as part of community
outreach in advance of presenting to Council (2.44.020)
01/08/2026 TSC 20 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Traffic Safety Commission
City Engineer Delegated
Authority
Traffic control measures related to temporary road construction activities (unless 3 Councilmembers vote
against; City Engineer must provide Council 7 day’s
notice for certain conditions) –no TSC oversight
(10.04.030.H.1)
Emergency traffic regulations with concurrence from
Chief of Police –TSC oversight is optional
(10.04.030.H.2; 10.12.030)
Special event regulations for special events in the public
right-of-way (10.04.030.H.3)
Determining installation, proper timing, and
maintenance of traffic control devices after analysis of
collision data and traffic patterns (10.12.020.B)
No parking zones up to 200 feet (10.52.070.C)
01/08/2026 TSC 21 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Traffic Safety Commission
Planning Commission’s
Authority
Planning Commission is given the authority to:
Recommend to the Council, the adoption, amendment,
or repeal of a Master Plan or any part thereof for the
physical development of the City; and
Exercises such functions with respect to land
subdivisions, planning, and zoning as may be prescribed
by ordinance. (2.42)
The section vests the Planning Commission with the power
to recommend to Council issues over “physical
development of the City,” which would authorize the
Planning Commission to review and determine
development issues such as traffic impact studies,
improvements, and issues before Council consideration
Such authority is not identified in the CVMC for the TSC
01/08/2026 TSC 22 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 23 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
January 2026
01/08/2026 TSC 24 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Traffic Safety
Commission
Traffic Collisions
01/08/2026 TSC 25 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Traffic Safety
Commission
Traffic Citations*
* NOT counting
parking citations
01/08/2026 TSC 26 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 27 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
January 2026
01/08/2026 TSC 28 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 29 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Safety Commission
TRF0415
3
Project to construct a new raised median to restrict westbound left-turns out of Old Telegraph
Canyon Road and provide U-turn pocket and traffic signal modification at Telegraph Canyon
Road & Medical Center Drive.
01/08/2026 TSC 30 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Safety Commission
TRF0411
4
Project will construct a pedestrian mid-block uncontrolled crosswalk on Quintard Street for
Castle Park Middle School.
01/08/2026 TSC 31 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Safety Commission
TRF0426
5
Project will expand
the existing adaptive
traffic signal system
along Telegraph
Canyon Road & Otay
Lakes Road
01/08/2026 TSC 32 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Safety Commission
STM0386/STM0388
6
STM0386 - Project will complete the Heritage Road bridge improvements on Heritage Road from
Entertainment Circle North (Amphitheater) to Main Street intersection crossing the Otay River
STM0388 – Main Street widening from Nirvana Avenue to
Heritage Road & Main Street intersection
01/08/2026 TSC 33 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 34 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Safety Commission
TRF0429
8
Project will incorporate concrete
curb “bulb-outs” to provide
additional sidewalk space for
pedestrians, shortening the crossing
distance on the crosswalk. The
project will also install pedestrian-
activated rectangular rapid flashing
beacons (RRFBs).
*Estimated advertisement in Fall 2026
01/08/2026 TSC 35 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Safety Commission
TRF0436
9
Project includes upgrades to
existing flashing beacon crossing
at Fourth Avenue & Orsett Street
in front of Lauderbach
Elementary School to a
pedestrian hybrid beacon
*Estimated advertisement in Spring 202601/08/2026 TSC 36 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Safety Commission
TRF0441
Valle Lindo Elementary School Mid-Block
Pedestrian Crossing
10
Project will construct curb extensions at the pedestrian crossing located in the
vicinity of Valle Lindo Elementary School.
*Project advertisement
estimated for Spring 2026
01/08/2026 TSC 37 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Safety Commission
TRF0443
L Street & Industrial Blvd Intersection
Improvements
11
Project will upgrade traffic signal hardware, install accessible pedestrian signal
equipment and install ADA curb ramps.
*Project advertisement
estimated for Spring 2027
01/08/2026 TSC 38 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
Safety Commission
STL0464
*Project currently undergoing consultant
selection for design services01/08/2026 TSC 39 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission
01/08/2026 TSC 40 of 40
City of Chula Vista Safety Commission