The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 1995/06/27 , "I declare NnC:"r penalty of perjury t~at I am I employed by the City of Chura Vista '".the Office of the City ClerK and that I pos,od this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin B~ard at, Tuesday, June 27, 1995 the Publi~ rv' .~uilding aŠ#~~- Council Chambers 4:00 p.m. DATED. :.l - ~-- SIGNED Public Services Building Regular Meeting of the City of Chula Vista City Council CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Alevy -, Moot -' Padilla -, Rindone -' and Mayor Horton -' 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 13, 1995. 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: None submitted. ***** Effective April I, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now reconvene into open session to report any J1ll!Jl actions taken in closed session and to adjourn the meeting. Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However, final actions reported win be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office. ***** CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 6) The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fin out a "Request to Speak Form" availllble in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink fonn to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public win be the first items of business. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that there were no observed reportable actions taken in Closed Session on 6/20/95. In addition, in Closed Session on 6/21/95, the City Attorney hereby reports that although it is not necessarily reportable action, the City Council authorized a settlement offer in the Metro Sewer Billing dispute, the extent of which is of a nature to be kept confidential. Further negotiations are believed necessary in order to produce a settlement. It is recommeoded that the letter be received and filed. I ------------------------------ --..----------------- ------- ---------~-~--- Agenda -2- June 27, 1995 6. RESOLUTION 17938 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE TO PAY THE SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR THE VISITOR CENTER IN THREE ANNUAL PAYMENTS- The United States Olympic Committee has been processing the plans for construction of the Visitor Center at the Olympic Training Center. As the Committee was preparing to obtain the building permit, they discovered that the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee (SC Swr DIF) had not been anticipated and was beyond their financing capacity at this time. The Committee has, therefore, requested that the City allow payment of the SC Swr DIF for the Visitor Center in three equal installments. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. 7. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR 1995/96 - Council has held five special work sessions to consider and discuss the proposed fiscal year 1995/96 budget. Council has received citizen input and discussed in detail with staff the impact of this budget on all City operations. The Manager's proposed budget has been amended based on tentative decisions by the Council at the budget work sessions and it is this amended budget which is recommended to be adopted. Staff recommends Council accept public testimony and adopt the proposed budget as amended during the review sessions and as may be further amended as a result of the public testimony. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Administration) RESOLUTION 17939 ADOPTION OF THE FINAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1995 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996 AND AMENDING THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE TO INCORPORATE CHANGES TO FEES AND FINES PROPOSED IN THE 1995/96 BUDGET 8. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF RATE DECREASE FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE, RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE AND YARD WASTE RECYCLING - The report describes proposed changes to the existing rates charged by Laidlaw Waste Systems as a result of a number of changes to different components of the rate. The overall effect on the final rates is a significant decrease from the existing rates. The report also addresses the cost of establishing a new administrative component of the overall rate as allowed by Public Resources Code Section 41901. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Deputy City Manager Krempl and Principal Management Assistant Snyder) Time certain 6:00 n.m. RESOLUTION 17940 APPROVING RATE SCHEDULES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE, RESIDENTIAL AND YARD WASTE RECYCLING EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1995 ---- - - -------- ---- ---------------------- -- Agenda -3- June 27, 1995 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the Council'sjurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State lllw, however, generally prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" availllble in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS This is the lime the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees. None submitted. ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak" foro¡ available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public comments are limited to five minutes. 9.A. ORDINANCE 2632 AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CllliLA VISTA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM lufI!encv and second readim!1 - Staff reCommends Council place the ordinance on second reading as an urgency measure and adopt effective immediately. (Administration) 4/5th's vote required. B. RESOLUTION 17941 UNILATERALLY IMPLEMENTING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT AFTER IMPASSE FOR EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE WESTERN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERS (WCE) FOR THE PERIOD OF 7/8/94 THROUGH 7/6/95 - On 6/2/95, representatives ofWCE and the City came to tentative agreement on a four-year Memorandum of Understanding covering the period 7/8/94 through about 1/1/98. On 6/20/95, WCE membership held a ratification meeting but did not ratify the tentative agreement. Impasse was declared by the City on 6/20/95. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (City Chief Negotiator for WCE) C. RESOLUTION 17942 APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING WAGES AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT WITH THE CllliLA VISTA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CVEA) FOR FISCAL YEARS 1994/95 THROUGH 1997/98 AND APPROVING THE ACCOMPANYING SIDE LETTERS OF UNDERSTANDING - This is an agreement with CVEA for four years regarding wages and other benefits. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Personnel) ,3 -----..---------- - Agenda -4- June27,1995 10. RESOLUTION 17943 AMENDING AGREEMENT NUMBER 114239 WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXTENDING THE TERMINATION DATE AND BUDGET THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 FOR THE TELECENTER PROJECT; EXTENDING LEASE AGREEMENT ON A MONTHLY BASIS FOR THE "H" STREET TELECENTER AND APPROPRIATING $20,000 FOR SAME - The item provides for approval to roll-over existing funds from fiscal year 1994/95 to allow expenditures in fiscal year 1995/96 from existing grant through Caltrans. It also extends the lease agreement with Kelton Title Corp on a monthly basis for the East "R" Street Telecenter and establishes budget for fiscal year 1995/96. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Environmental Resource Manager) 4/5th's vote required. 11. RESOLUTION 17944 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 CITY BUDGET TO INCLUDE YEAR ONE BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL COMMERCE ALLIANCE APPROPRIATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $956,536 WHICH INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF THREE INTERIM FULL-TIME ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS - On 1/10/95, Council approved the three year Border Environmental Commerce Alliance (BECA) budget and related staff for submission in the City's application to EDA. The BECA budget and staff have subsequently been approved by EDA. Council needs to take the necessary administrative actions to legally appropriate the already approved BECA budget and staff as part of the City's fiscal year 1995/96 budget, appropriate the Year One BECA budget, and approve the addition of the three BECA interim City personnel. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Community Development) 4/5th's vote required. 12.A. RESOLUTION 17945 SUPPORTING THE PROPOSAL TO FUND THE SAN MIGUEL CONNECTOR FROM TRANSNET FUNDS AS A SCALED DOWN PROJECT SUBJECT TO IT BEING CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULE FOR ST -125 SOUTH SECTION AND SUBJECT TO THE SR-125 SWEETWATER SECTION BEING CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADOYfED PLAN OF FINANCE - California Transportation Ventures has requested the opportunity to address Council on two issues concerning the SR-125 Toll Road between the US/Mexican horder (SR- 905) and SR-54. Due to several factors, funds are not expected to be adequate to construct the entire regional highway system under the Transnet Program. This could mean that the San Miguel connector between the Toll Road and SR- 125 will not be fully funded. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions. (Director of Public Works) B. RESOLUTION 17946 SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION VENTURES TO CONSTRUCT SR-125 BETWEEN SR-905 AND SR-54 ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers. Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual. J -----~---- -"---------- -~--------_....__.._-- Agenda -5- June 27, 1995 OTHER BUSINESS 13. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Is) a. Scheduling of meetings. 14. MAYOR'S REPORTIS) 15. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Rindone a. Status report on negotiations of the Broadway Business Homes Project. The request is to discuss in Closed Session. ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on July 11, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A Special Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council Meeting. A Special Meeting of the Industrial Development Authority will be held immediately following the Special Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency. A Special Meeting of the Housing Authority will be held immediately following the Special Meeting of the Industrial Development Authority. ***** CLOSED SESSION Unless the City Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are permitted by lllw to be the subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the interests of the City. The Council is required by lllw to return to open session, issue any reports of J1ll!Jl action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session, reports of J1ll!Jl action taken, and at/journment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken win be recorded in the minutes which will be availllble in the City Clerk's Office. 16. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING: 1. Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 . Chula Vista and nine other cities vs. the County of San Diego regarding solid waste issues (trash litigation). 2. Anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 . Metro Sewer Adjustment Billing (water reclamation and expansion costs) and EPA lawsuit. June 22, 1995 TO: The Honorable Mayor and city CoU~~ FROM: John D. Goss, city ManagerJ~~ ~ ~ SUBJECT: City Council Meeting of June 27~ 1995 This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting of Tuesday, June 27,1995. Comments regarding the Written Communications are as follows: 5a. This is a letter from the City Attorney stating that there were no observed reportable actions taken in Closed Session on 6/20/95. In addition, in Closed Session on 6/21/95, the City Attorney hereby reports that although it is not necessarily reportable action, the City Council authorized a settlement offer in the Metro Sewer Billing dispute, the extent of which is of a nature to be kept confidential. Further negotiations are believed necessary in order to produce a settlement. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED. JDG:SWM:mab ------.-- ----._----. ---- - ----.------------.--. ~~f?- ::-~ç ~:::.......... CllY OF CHULA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Date: June 21, 1995 To: The Honorable Mayor and City cou~ From: Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney Re: Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session for the Meetings of 6/20/95 and 6/21/95 The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of my knowledge from observance of actions taken in the Closed Session, that there were no actions taken in the Closed Session of 6/20/95 which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. In addition, in Closed Session on 6/21/95, the City Attorney hereby reports that although it is not necessarily reportable action, the City Council authorized a settlement offer in the Metro Sewer Billing dispute, the extent of which is of a nature to be kept conf idential. Further negotiations are believed necessary in order to produce a settlement. BMB: Igk 0:\lt\01066066.00 5a-/ 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5037 ---. -.---------. ------ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item~ Meeting Date 06/27/95 I 79;rr ITEM TITLE: Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the United States Olympic Committee to pay the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Pee for the Visitor Center in three annual payments. SUBMITTED BY: D",- of PubUo't{ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ~ ----? (4/5ths Yote: Yes_NoX) The United States Olympic Committee has been processing the plans for construction of the Visitor Center at the Olympic Training Center in Chula Vista. As the Committee was preparing to obtain the building permit, they discovered that the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Pee (DIP) had not been anticipated and was beyond their fmancing capacity at this time. The Committee has, therefore, requested that the City allow payment of the Salt Creek Sewer DIP for the Visitor Center in three equal annual installments. Because they are ready to pull their building permits and are on a time frame ito be open this winter, they requested this item be concluded as soon as possible. This item authorizes the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the United States Olympic Committee for payment of this fee. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the United States Olympic Committee to pay the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Pee for the Visitor Center in three equal annual installments. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A DISCUSSION: On December 6, 1994, the City Council approved ordinance 2617 (attached as Exhibit 'A') establishing the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Pee to pay for improvements within the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. The ordinance was based on the Salt Creek Basin Gravity Sewer Analysis that estimated the ultimate sewer flows anticipated from the Otay Lake and Salt Creek Basins, recommended sewer facilities needed to transport the flows, and established a fee for developments within these basins. Since the Otay Lakes Sewer basin drains naturally into the Lower and Upper Otay Reservoirs, development in that basin requires pumping into the Salt Crek basin. The study area of the report included four "properties" located within the basins. Flows from Eastlake and the Olympic Training Center plus portions of Salt Creek Ranch and Otay Ranch are tributary to the Salt Creek sewer basin. The report recommended the construction of the Salt ¿~! '/ ---._----~------ - Page 2, Itemk Meeting Date...6mL2S... Creek Interceptor within the Salt Creek sewer basin to transport sewage flow from these properties to future downstream transmission and treatment facilities. The construction of these facilities will be fInanced by the development impact fee. The cost per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) was calculated based on the total ultimate number of EDU's requiring service in the Otay Lake and Salt Creek basins. The fee was calculated to be be $284 per EDU, based on a total of 28,737 EDU's discharging to the interceptor and a total cost of $8,170,678 including contingencies. In the report, the Olympic Training Center facility was broken down into four separate uses and a sewage generation was assigned to each of those uses. The Visitor Center was assigned an EDU factor of 16 EDU's per acre. Attached as Exhibit 'B' is copy of Table 6 from the final report indicating the EDU conversion factors for financial analysis. In a companion report on the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement incorporating pumped flows, the Visitor Center was estimated at 14.8 acres. Attached as Exhibit 'C' is Figure 6 from that report showing the acreage. The combination of those figures resulted in a Salt Creek Sewer DIF of $67,308.00 ($284/EDU x 16EDU/acre x 14.8 acres) for the Visitor Center. The report was sent to all of the affected developers, including the Olympic Training Center (OTe) , and a public meeting was held on October 18 , 1993 to discuss the report and staff recommendations. Although they were notified, the OTC representatives did not attend the meeting. Recently, when the architect for the Visitor Center at the OTC came in to pull the building permits, they were advised of the amount of the permit based on the plan check. The Visitor Center had gone through the design review process and they were notified that the permit would be subject to several sewer fees although, due to the preliminary nature of the plans at that time, they were not informed of the amOl1llt. Because they had apparently not planned on this fee, they were surprised by the amount. When they indicated that they had not previously paid the fee on their other building permits, it was shown that those previous permits had been taken out before the adoption of the fee. They then requested staff to review the calculations. Staff reviewed the plans for the Visitor Center at this point and determined that, based on the actual development plan, the COITect figure for the Visitor Center should be based on the actual development of 5.7 acres resulting in a revised Salt Creek Sewer DIF of $25,900.80 ($284/EDU x 16EDU/acre x 5.7acres). The remaining 9.1 acres is anticipated to be developed as overflow parking which)Vill only have a minor impact on the sewer flow, the parking only being used by visitors during major events. As a side note, the Olympic Committee believes that even this corrected fee is inappropriate and should be recalculated. Staff will be pursuing their request and, as required by Section 18 (Procedure for Fee Modification) of Ordinace 2617 will be returning to Council after an analysis is completed. This analysis could result in further modifications to the fee. The entire fee distribution issue which might result from such a modification will be reviewed as part of the next Salt Creek Sewer DIF update. ¡. .r,;2. 'G ~---- ---..-.. - - - ------_._-----~- ----- Page 3, Item~ Meeting Date~ Because the United States Olympic Committee had not anticipated this fee, their financing was not sufficient to pay the entire fee at this time. They have, therefore, requested that they be allowed to enter into an agreement with the City to pay the fee in three installments. The first installment would be paid at the time the building permit is issued. The two remaining payments are proposed to be paid one year and two years from the date of the permit. Because of the time frame resulting from the Olympic Committee's desire to get the improvements completed as soon as possible, there was insufficient time for the final agreement to be worked out before coming to the Council. It is recommended that the City Manager be authorized to enter into this agreement on behalf of the City. Staff believes that it is appropriate to allow payment of the fee in three installments because the Visitor Center permit being taken out at this time does not construct the entire proposed Visitor Center. Since the full Visitor Center is not being constructed at this time, the sewer usage from this facility will not be at the ultimate flow. There are two future expansions that will provide an auditorium and exhibit hall which will both attract more visitors and, as a result, increase the sewer use to the maximum from this portion of the facility. Further, since the Salt Creek sewer is not planned to be constructed within the next two to three years, the need for these funds is not critical. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this resolution will authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement to defer payment of a portion of the Salt Creek Sewer DIF for a maximum of two years. The Olympic Committee would pay approximately $8,660 now and in two future payments for a total of $25,980. Since the line is anticipated to be built by the developers, who will either receive credit towards future building permits or reimbursement from an assessment district for any cost not collected by the time the line is built, there will be no direct impact to the Salt Creek Sewer DIP. Attachments: Exhibit A: Ordinance 2617 Exhibit B: Table 6, EDU conversion Factorsfor financial analysis Exhibit--C Table 6, Total pumped EDU's by land use type Exhibit D Letter from USOC m: \home lengineerlagenda lotcswr . cis '¡;-:>ß-7' ') -----.---. -~-------_._----_.__._------------ .._-----_..~..__._--_. ---- RESOLUTION NO. /7:JJr RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE TO PAY THE SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR THE VISITOR CENTER IN THREE ANNUAL PAYMENTS WHEREAS, the united States Olympic Committee has been processing the plans for construction of the Visitor Center at the Olympic Training Center in Chula Vista; and WHEREAS, as the Committee was preparing to obtain the building permit, they discovered that the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee (DIF) had not been anticipated and was beyond their financing capacity at this time; and WHEREAS, the Committee has, therefore, requested that the City allow payment of the Salt Creek Sewer DIF for the Visitor Center in three equal annual installments; and WHEREAS, because they are ready to pull their building permits and are on a time frame to be open this winter, they requested this item to be concluded as soon as possible; and WHEREAS, this resolution authorizes the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the united States Olympic Committee for payment of this fee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the united States Olympic Committee to pay the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee for the Visitor Center in three annual payments, and that once a satisfactory has been finalized, the City Manager is authorized to permit the issuance of the requirement building permits if all other requirements are met other than the payment of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee. Presented by 7!;..ed r/ ¡hi: John P. Lippitt, Director of Bruce M. Bo Public Works Attorney C:\rs\otcsewer.dif ¿'-..?'ß-? 10 EXHJ[j¡r 'A' ORDINANCE NO. 2617 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO PAY FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN AS A CONDITION OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS WHEREAS, developers of land within the City should be required to mitigate the burden created by development through the construction or improvement of sewer facilities within the boundaries of the development and either the construction or improvement of sewer facilities outside the boundaries of the development which are needed to provide service to the development in accordance with City standards or the payment of a fee to finance a development's portion of the total cost of the public facilities; and. WHEREAS, all development within the City contributes to the cumulative burden on various sewer facilities in direct relationship to the amount of population generated by the development or the gross acreage of the commercial or industrial land in the development; and, WHEREAS, the Salt Creek Sewer Basin (Gravity Basin) is that area of land within the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego from which wastewater will flow by gravity from Salt Creek into the Otay River Valley. The Otay Lake Basins are those areas of land within the County of San Diego from which wastewater will flow by gravity into the Lower and Upper Otay Lake Reservoirs. a portion of which will be pumped into the Gravity Basin. These areas are shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit" A". Salt Creek Sewer Study Map. This map is also included as an attachment to the Salt Creek Ba.sin Gravity Sewer Analysis; and. .~ WHEREAS, Wilson Engineering has prepared the Salt Creek Basin avity Sewer Analysis ("Report") dated November 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Report has determined that new development within Upper and Lower Otay Lake and Salt Creek Basins will create adverse impacts on the City's existing sewer facilities--to wit, that there are no existing sewers which can serve gravity sewage flows expected to be generated from new development within these Basins--which must be mitigated by the financing and construction of certain sewer facilities identified in this ordinance; and, WHEREAS. said Report includes an estimate of ultimate sewer flows anticipated from the Otay Lake and Salt Creek Basins. recommends sewer facilities needed to transport these flows. and establishes a fee payable by persons obtaining building permits for developments within these basins benefiting from the construction of these facilities; and, WHEREAS. on October 18. 1993 a public meeting was held with the owners and developers of properties located within the Gravity Basin to discuss the Report and city staff recommendations for establishing the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee; and, WHEREAS. the Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study. IS-94- &,r7 -.-- . -------- --- ...----------- ------~--------------------_._-~_._~----_...__. Ordinance No. 2617 Page 2 24, of potential environmental impact associated with the proposed Project and has concluded that there would be no significant environmental impacts, and recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on 15-94-24; and, WHEREAS, on November 22, 1994 a Public Hearing was held before the City Council to provide an opportunity for interested persons to be heard on the approval of the Report and establishment of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee; and, WHEREAS, the City Council determined, based upon the evidence presented at the Public Hearing, including, but not limited to, the Report and other information received by the City Council in the course of its business, that imposition of the sewer facilities development impact fee on all developments within the Salt Creek and Otay Lake Basins in the City of Chula Vista for which building permits have not yet been issued is necessary in order to protect the public safety and welfare and to ensure effective implementation of the City's General Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the amount of the fee levied by this ordinance does not exceed the estimated cost of providing the public facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: SECTION 1. Environmental Review. That the Project will have no significant environmental impacts, and the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby adopts the Negative Declaration issued on 15-94-24. SECTION 2. Approval of Report. The City Council has independently reviewed the proposed Report herewith presented, finds that it is fair, reasonable and equitable to all parties, and herewith adopts same in the form on file with the City Clerk, known as document number CO94-260, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer. SECTION 3. "Facilities". The facilities which are the subject matter of the fee herein established are fully described in the Report at page 10, Table 5 thereof, and the locations at which they will be constructed are shown on Exhibit "A", Salt Creek Basin Sewer Study Map, which is included in the Report, all of which facilities may be modified by the City Council from time to time by resolution ("Facilities"). The City Council may modify or amend the list of projects herein considered to be part of the Facilities by written resolution tf;,~ ---------------- ---- --------- ------ ---- Ordinance No. 2617 Page 3 in order to maintain compliance with the City's Capital Improvement Program or to reflect changes in land development and estimated and actual wastewater flow. SECTION 4. Territory to Which Fee Is Applicable. The area of the City of Chula Vista to which the Fee herein established shall be applicable is set forth on Exhibit "A", and is generally described as the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, that portion of the Upper Otay Lake Basin north of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, and that portion of the Lower Otay Lake Basin east of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. SECTION 5. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to provide the necessary financing to construct the Salt Creek Interceptor within the areas shown in Exhibit" A". SECTION 6. Establishment of Fee. A Development Impact Fee ("Fee"), to be expressed on a per Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") basis. and payable prior to the issuance of a building permit for a development project within the Territory, is hereby established. SECTION 7. Due on Issuance of Building Permit. The Fee shall be paid in cash upon the issuance of a building permit. Early payment is not permitted. SECTION 8. Determination of Equivalent Dwelling Units. Each single family detached dwelling or single family attached dwelling shall be considered one EDU for purposes of this Fee. Each unit within a multi- family dwelling shall be considered 0.75 EDU. Every other commercial, industrial, non-profit, public or quasi-public, or other usage shall be charged at a rate calculated in accordance with the method for estimating ED Us set forth in Exhibit "B", EDU Conversion Factors For Financial Analysis, and is included as Table 6 in the Report. SECTION 9. Time to Determine Amount Due; Advance Payment Prohibited. The Fee for each development shall be calculated at the time of building ~~9 ,~~; --~~.. ----.--------. - ... --~------~- ------~ Ordinance No. 2617 Page 4 permit issuance and shall be the amount as indicated at that time and not when the tentative map or final map was granted or applied for, or when the building permit plan check was conducted, or when application was made for the building permit. SECTION 10. Purpose and Use of Fee. The purpose of the Fee is to pay for the planning, design, construction and/or financing (including the cost of interest and other financing costs as appropriate) of the Facilities, or reimbursement to the City or, at the discretion of the City if approved in advance in writing, other third parties for advancing costs actually incurred for planning, designing, constructing, or financing the Facilities. Any use of the Fee shall receive the advance consent of the City Council and be used in a manner consistent with the purpose of the Fee. SECTION 11. Amount of Fee; Amendment to the Master Fee Schedule. The Fee shall be calculated at the rate of $284 per EDU. Chapter XVI, Other Fees, of the Master Fee Schedule is hereby amended to add Section C, which shall read as fòllows: .C. Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee. This section is intended to memorialize the key provisions of Ordinance No._, but said Ordinance governs over the provisions of the Master Fee Schedule. For example, in the event of a conflict in interpretation between the Master Fee Schedule and the Ordinance, or in the event that there are additional rules applicable to the imposition of the Fee, the language of the Ordinance governs. a. Territory to which Fee Applicable. The area of the City of Chula Vista to which the Fee herein established shall be applicable is set forth in Exhibit. A. of the Salt Creek Basin Gravity Sewer Analysis dated November 1994, and is generally described as the Salt Creek Basin. that portion of the Upper Otay lake Basin north of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. and that portion of the Lower Otay lake Basin east of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. b. Rate per EDU. The Fee shall be calculated at the rate of $284 per EDU, which rate shall be adjusted from time to time by the City Council. ç.jtJ ------..- ---- -------------------.-----------------------------. ..------. ------ Ordinance No. 2617 Page 5 c. EDU Calculation. Each single family detached dwelling or single family attached dwelling shall be considered one EDU for purposes of this Fee. Each unit within a multi-family dwelling shall be considered 0.75 EDU. Every other commercial. industrial. non-profit. public or quasi-public. or other usage shall be charged at a rate calculated in accordance with the method for estimating ED Us set forth in Table 6 of the Salt Creek Basin Gravity Sewer Analysis. "Flow Rates and Equivalent Dwelling Unit Factors". d. When Payable. The Fee shall be paid in cash not later than immediately prior to the issuance of a building permit." The City Council intends to review the amount of the Fee annually or from time to time. The City Council may. at such reviews. adjust the amount of this Fee as necessary to assure construction and operation of the Facilities. The reasons for which adjustments may be made include. but are limited to, the following: changes in the costs of the Facilities as may be reflected by such index as the Council deems appropriate, such as the Engineering-News Rec.ord Construction Cost Index (ENR-CCI); changes in the type. size, location or cost of the Facilities to be financed by the Fee; changes in land use on approved tentative maps or Specific Plan Amendments; other sound engineering, financing and planning information. Adjustments to the above Fee may be made by resolution amending the Master Fee Schedule. SECTION 12. Authority for Accounting and Expenditures. The proceeds collected from the imposition of the Fee shall be deposited into a public facility financing fund ("Salt Creek Sewer Basin Benefit Area Fee Fund". or alternatively herein "Fund") which is hereby created and shall be expended only for the purposes set forth in this ordinance. The Director of Finance is authorized to establish various accounts within the Fund for the Facilities identified in this ordinance and to periodically make expenditures from the Fund for the purposes set forth herein in accordance with the facilities phasing plan or capital improvement plan adopted by the City Council. &~// -_._~---- - --------------------- ---.-.--- Ordinance No. 2617 Page 6 SECTION 13. Findings. The City Council finds that collection of the Fees established by this ordinance at the time of issuance of the building permit is necessary to ensure that funds will be available for the construction of facilities concurrent with the need for these facilities and to ensure certainty in the capital facilities budgeting for growth impacted public facilities. SECTION 14. Fee Additional to other Fees and Charges. The Fee established by this section is in addition to the requirements imposed by other City laws, policies or regulations relating to the construction or the financing of the construction of public improvements within subdivisions or developments. SECTION 15. Mandatory Construction of a Portion of the Facilities; Duty to Tender Reimbursement Offer. Whenever a developer of a development project is required as a condition of approval of a development permit to cause a portion of the sewer system which is the subject matter of a Facilities enhancement planned for improvement under the Basin Plan to be constructed to accommodate the sewage flow generated by the development, the City may require the developer to install Facilities according to design specifications approved by the City. Such improvements shall have the size or capacity necessary to accommodate estimated ultimate flow as indicated in the Basin Plan and subsequent amendments. If such a requirement is imposed, the City shall offer to reimburse the developer from the Fund either in cash or over time as Fees are collected, at the option of the City, for costs incurred by the developer for the design and construction of the Facility not to exceed the estimated cost of that particular Facility as included in the calculation and updating of the Fee. The City may update the Fee calculation as City deems appropriate prior to making such offer. This duty to offer reimbursement shall be independent of the developer's obligation to pay the Fee. SECTION 16. Voluntary Construction of a Portion of the Facilities; Duty of City to Tender Reimbursement Offer. If a developer is willing and agrees in writing to design and construct a portion of the Facilities in conjunction with the prosecution of a development project within the Territory, the City may, as part of the written agreement, grant credits against the Developer's obligation to pay the Fee, and may thereafter, use the proceeds of the Fund to reimburse the ¿ ~/;J.., 16 ------- - .----- ------- ~-----~~--- -------- Ordinance No. 2617 Page 7 developer from the Fund either at the time the expenditures are incurred or over time as fees are collected, at the option of the City, for costs incurred by the developer for the design and construction of the Facility not to exceed the estimated cost of that particular Facility as included in the calculation and updating of the Fee, and in an amount agreed to in advance of their expenditure in writing by the City. The City may update the Fee calculation as City deems appropriate prior to making such offer. This duty to extend credits or offer reimbursement shall be independent of the developer's obligation to pay the Fee. SECTION 17. Procedure for Entitlement to Reimbursement Offer. The City's duty to extend a reimbursement offer to a developer pursuant to Section 14 or 15 above shall be conditioned on the developer complying with the terms and conditions of this section: a. Written authorization shall be requested by the developer from the City and issued by the City Council by written resolution before developer may incur any costs eligible for reimbursement relating to the Work. b. The request for authorization shall contain the following information, and such other information as may from time to time be requested by the City: (1) Detailed descriptions of the Work with the preliminary cost estimate. c. If the Council grants authorization, it shall be by written agreement with the Developer, and on the following conditions among such other conditions as the Council may from time to time impose: (1) Developer shall prepare all plans and specifications and submit same to the City for approval; (2) Developer shall secure and dedicate any right-of-way required for the Work; (3) Developer shall secure all required permits and environmental clearances necessary for construction of the project; (4) Developer shall provide performance bonds in a form and amount, and with a surety satisfactory to the City; (5) Developer shall pay all City fees and costs. ~~/3 I' ' , ! - --.----- Ordinance No. 2617 Page 8 (6) The City shall be held harmless and indemnified, and upon demand by the City, defended by the developer for any of the costs and liabilities associated with the construction of the project. (7) The developer shall advance all necessary funds to design and construct the project. (8) The developer shall secure at least three (3) qualified bids for work to be done. The construction contract shall be granted to the lowest qualified bidder. Any claims for additional payment for extra work or charges during construction shall be justified and shall be documented to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. (9) The developer shall provide a detailed cost estimate which itemizes those costs of the construction attributable to the Work. The estimate is preliminary and subject to final determination by the Director of Public Works upon completion of the Public Facility Project. (10) The agreeme.nt may provide that upon determination of satisfactory incremental completion of a Facility, as approved and certified by the Director of Public Works, the City may pay the developer progress payments in an amount not to exceed 75 percent of the estimated cost of the construction completed to the time of the progress payment but shall provide in such case for the retention of 25% of such costs until issuance by the City of a Notice of Completion. (11) The agreement may provide that any funds owed to the developer as reimbursements may be applied to the developer's obligations to pay the Fee for building permits to be applied for in the future. (12) When all work has been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the developer shall submit verification of payments made for the construction of the project to the City. The Director of Public Works shall make the final determination on expenditures which are eligible for reimbursement. (13) After final determination of expenditures eligible for reimbursement has been made by the Public Works Director, the parties may agree to offset the developer's duty to pay Fees required by this ordinance against the City's duty to reimburse the developer. ~~J( --._----~----- -------. -------..--------------- Ordinance No. 2617 Page 9 (14) If, after offset if any, funds are due the developer under this section, the City shall reimburse the developer from the Fund either at the time the expenditures are incurred or over time as Fees are collected, at the option of the City, for eligible costs incurred by the developer for the design and construction of the Facility not to exceed the estimated cost of that particular Facility as included in the calculation and updating of the Fee; or the developer may waive reimbursement and use the amount due them as credit against future Development Impact Fee obligations. SECTION 18. Procedure for Fee Modification. Any developer who. because of the nature or type of uses proposed for a development project, contends that application of the Fee imposed by this ordinance is unconstitutional or unrelated to mitigation of the burdens of the development, may a¡1ply to the City Council for a modification of the Fee and the manner in which it is calculated. The application shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk not later than ten (10) days after notice is given of the public hearing on the development permit application for the project, or if no development permit is required, at the time of the filing of the building permit application. The application shall state.in detail the factual basis for the claim of modification. and shall provide an engineering and accounting report showing the overall impact on the DIF and the ability of the City to complete construction of the Facilities by making the modification requested by the applicant. The City Council shall make reasonable efforts to consider the application within sixty (60) days after its filing. The decision of the City Council shall be final. The procedure provided by this section is additional to any other procedure authorized by law for protection or challenging the Fee imposed by this ordinance. SECTION 19. Fee Applicable to Public Agencies. Development projects by public agencies, including schools, shall not be exempt from the provisions of the Fee. SECTION 20. Assessment District. If any assessment or special taxing district is established to design, construct and pay for any or all of the Facilities ("Work Alternatively Financed"), the owner or developer of a project may apply to the City Council for reimbursement from the Fund in an amount equal to that portion of the cost included in the calculation of the Fee attributable to the Work Alternatively Financed. In this regard. the amount of the reimbursement ......--- þ-/~ J --~'---_-____n- - ------- -~----- - --- -------------~-------------- Ordinance No. 2617 Page 10 shall be based on the costs included in the Basin Plan, as amended from time to time, and therefore, will not include any portion of the financing costs associated with the formation of the assessment or other special taxing district. SECTION 21. Expiration of this Ordinance. This ordinance shall be of no further force and effect when the City Council determines that the amount of Fees which have been collected reaches an amount equal to the cost of the Facilities. SECTION 22. Time Limit for Judicial Action. Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this ordinance shall be brought within the time period as established by Government Code Section 54995 after the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 23. Other Not Previously Defined Terms. For the purposes of this ordinance, the following words or phrases shall be construed as defined in this Section, unless from the context it appears that a different meaning is intended. (a) "Building Permit" means a permit required by and issued pursuant to the Uniform Building Code as adopted by reference by this City. (b) "Developer" means the owner or developer of a development. (c) "Development Permit" means any discretionary permit, entitlement or approval for a development project issued under any zoning or subdivision ordinance of the City. (d) "Development Project" or "Development" means any activity described in Section 65927 and 65928 of the State Government Code. (e) "Single Family Attached Dwelling" means a single family dwelling attached to another single family dwelling, with each dwelling on its own lot. &-/? ~):) --...--- -- ,----....--- -. ----------~-- Ordinance No. 2617 Page 11 SECTION 24. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective sixty (60) days after its second reading and adoption. Presented by l ÄT7 by ~~~~~ Bruce M. Boogaa d Director of Public Works City Attorney &-/7 ,l..\ ..--.----------- - - ------ ------------------- Ordinance No. 2617 Page 12 EXHIBIT A I I I I -~ - ~-/r -- ------ - -. - ---- -- - -- - ~ - .- - - - - ~ Ordinance No. 2617 Page 13 EXHIBIT B EDU CONVERSION FACl'ORS FOR FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Land Use Sewage Flow Rate EDU Factor Residential. SFD 250 gpd!DU 1.00/DU Residential. Multi-Family 187 gpd;DU O.75/DU Commercial 2,500 gpd;acre 10.00/acre High School. 20 gpdistudent O.OB/student Junior High School. 20 gpd;student O.OB/student Elementary School. 15 gpd;student 0.06/student Park 500 gpd;acre 2.00/acre O.T.C. Training Facility 250 gpd;DU 1.00/DU O.T.C. Residential Dorms BO gpd;person 0.32/person O.T.C. Support Staff BO gpdiperson 0.32/person O.T.C. Visitor Center Acres 4,000 gpdiacre 16.00/acre CPF 2,500 gpd;acre 10.OO/acre O.T.C. . Olympic Training Center CPF . Community Purpose Facilities . If number of students is not provided, use 1000 gpd;acre or 4 EDU/acre ¿-;1 ~---------- ----- - -------.--------------- -------------.----- Ordinance No. 2617 Page 14 PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista. ¡ California, this 6th day December, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Fox. Padilla. Rindone, Horton NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) sS. CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I. Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2617 had its first reading on November 22, 1994, and its second reading and adoption at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 6th day of December, 1994. Executed this 6th day of December. 1994. ~ C. tldv&~ Beverly. Authelet. City Clerk ¿,.,,1.0 ------- ------ ---- II E ?O-118 rt '7;5) II TABLE 6 EDU CONVERSION FACTORS FOR FINANCIAL ANALYSIS . Residential -SFD 1.0 EDUIDU . Residential - Multi-family 0.75 EDU/DU Commercial 10 EDU / ACRE . High Scbool 0.08 EDU 1 Student Junior High School 0.08 EDU/Student I Elementary School 0.06 EDU 1 Student Park 2EDU/Acre . OTC Training Facility 1 EDU/DU OTC Residential Dorms 0.32 EDU/Person . OTC Support Staff 0.32 EDU/Person OTC Visitors Center 16 EDU/ Acre . CPF 10 EDU 1 Acre . TABLE 7 EDU PROJECTIONS FOR FEE CALCULATIONS . <\ ~~~ \\. I~ 11 \~ .~~ I~. "-"- '~f~r~~; i\ .<.......«....'.... ... <......... <".','.....'.i..... '.."...'.... i~ .~ i\\. \\ '.~. .'.'..'.. « <) . Single Family Residential 1,015 9,825 2,454 314 Multi-Family Residential - 5,113 1,373 - . Commercial - 5,087 150 - High Scbool - 200 - - . Jr. High School - 200 104 - Elementary Scbool 28 360 96 - . Park 44 345 75 - Olympic Training Center (OTC) - - 1,108 - . Community Purpose Faoilities (CPF) 70 736 40 - TOTAL 1,157 21,866 5,400 314 28,737 - I Sued o. .pproved GDPISRP land uae pl.... , City nf Cbul. Vi... projectio.a reviaed per SPA plan ame.dment. . . 12 b ';2/ .l I ExHrBiT 'C/ METHODOLOGY I . Figure 6 presents the total pumped EDU's per land use by multiplying the EDU factors for each land use developed in figure 5 times the pumped units per land use developed in figure 3. The total pumped EDU's equal 7,800. . I FIGURE 6 TOTAL PuMPED EDU's BY LAND USE TYPE TOTAL PuMPED LAND USE EDU FACTOR PuMPED UNITS EDU's II SFDU l.00/DU 3,592 DU's 3,592 MFDU .75/DU 3,137 DU's 2,353 . Commercial Acres 10.OO/acre 29.2 acres 292 High School Site 192.00/site I site 192 . Jr. High School Site I 12.00/site I site 112 \, Elementary School Sites 36.oo/site 4 sites 144 Reservoir Site 1.00/site I site I 18 Park Acres 2.00/acre 75.1 acres 150 O.T.C. Training Facility 1.00/DU 81 DU's 81 . O.T.C. Resident Dorms .32/person 1,000 persons 320 O.T.C Support Staff .32/person 524 persons ]68 O.T.C. Visitor Ctr. 16.00/acre 14.8 acres 237 . CPF Acres 10.OO/acre 15.8 acres 158 Total Pumped £OU's 7,800 . . . 18 q q . I I Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin I t ~.;2:2- 10 Improvenu<nt and Financing Plan I Incorporating Pumped Flows ------~- -- -~--- ----------~------_. ---_u_--------.--- -------------- USOC FACILITIES OPS ID:719-632-9810 JUN 21'95 17:26 No.OO6 P.O3 Ø".~ ,.' ~ \' /1 :>U S A\.. £1!1Iß /í b ~~~ ~';þ.. r" '...... Thomas C. Wilkin..m June 21, 1995 "",__...D~ City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: Sail Creek and Telegraph Canyon DIF Fees In an effort 10 receive construel/on permits for the Olympic Training Center Visitor's Center, the United Slates Olympic Committee (USeC) Is making payment of all City fees, including posting a Letter of Credit for $51 ,072 for Telegraph Canyon Sewer DIFfees and payment of $8,633 representing one-third (33%) of the requested $25,900 Salt Creek DIF fee. The usee makes these payments with the underslandlng that we believe that the DiF fees calculated for Telegraphy Canyon and Salt Creek sewer projects for the orc Visitor's Center are disproportionate to the amount of sewage capacity required for this facility, and that the usec reselVes the right to protest payment of these fees. Sincerely, ~/J d/i~. Thomas C. Wilkinson TCW/cld co: John lippitt Gøorge Kremple Cliff Swanson Laurie McKinley Urn"" ~...,... Olympic C"'IIInitl.. 1'150 E." H"..klor Strcci C<>ko'CId" ~""rilW'. Q~unod.. 1101)09 719-6~2-55.~1 ¿'-~.J J_r; Item # 7 Meeting Date 6/27/95 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing Consideration of the adoption of the city of Chula Vista Operating and Capital Budget for 1995-96 Resolution /7931 Approving Adoption of the final Operating and capital budgets of the City of Chula vista for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1996 and amending the Master Fee Schedule to incorporate changes to fees and fines ~s~ in ilie ",,-% -~t. SUBMITTED BY: City Manage~ b '--? (4/5ths Vote: YeS_NoXX) The city Council has held five special work sessions to consider and discuss the proposed FY 1995-96 budget. The Council has received citizen input and discussed in detail with staff the impact of this budget on all city operations. The Manager I s proposed budget has been amended based on tentative decisions by the Council at the budget work sessions and it is this amended budget which is recommended to be adopted. Based on the amendments the general fund budget is recommended to be $54,663,123 from the original proposed $54,326,000. The increase in funding of $337,123 is fully offset by an increase in revenues of $345,467 so that the amended budget represents a balanced budget (surplus of $8,344). RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept public testimony and adopt the proposed budget as amended during the review sessions and as may be further amended as a result of the public testimony. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The proposed Fiscal Year 1995-96 budget includes the Manager's recommended spending level, as well as adjustments proposed by Council during the budget workshops. The City Manager's recommended '}-/ ------ -.----.------------. --~---- ---.------------_._------- --------- -~-- Item # 7 Meeting Date 6/27/95 general fund budget is recommended to be $54,663,123 while the All Funds budget is recommended to be $105,080,603 which represents an increase of $1,828,749. The increase is discussed in the detail in the report as well as listed in the exhibits. During the Council budget workshops all City departments were tentatively approved. The following list includes all changes to the general fund as amended by Council's tentative action. General Fund Appropriation Amendments The following is a listing of all adjustments to the general fund appropriations: Administration $6,000 Cable TV rate consultant Administration $6,000 Labor negotiations consultant (POA) Boards & $1,270 Addition of $1,270 to IFC Commissions Building & Housing ($5,500) Deletion of funds for additional microfilming Council $8,040 Reinstatement of .25 Council Assistant Clerk (Elections) $7,000 Addition of one proposition Community $22,500 Addition of $5,000 for travel, $10,000 Development for San Diego EDC and $7,500 for South County EDC Community $15,000 Marketing program for economic Development development/city image. Community $1,407 Reclassification for 6 months for Development Admin. Office Specialist Finance $7,601 Reclassification for 6 months for Buyer, Customer Service Representative and Accounting Assistant II. Non-Departmental ($134,580) Transfer of Environmental Resources Manager and Conservation Coordinator and related support costs to the Public Works Department 7-2 I ì ---------- - -~---- -_.__._._--~----_.- Item # 7 Meeting Date 6/27/95 Parks & Recreation $72,000 Maintain existing salary structure for Aides, leaders and Specialists. Reduce new part-time staff salaries for Aides. Bring back report to clarify. Parks & Recreation $7,678 Add back the Sr. Lifeguard for 3 months. staff to return with alternatives. Personnel $64,204 Transfer of Police Community Relations coordinator to Personnel Department QWL/Training Coordinator subject to further evaluation and report back within 30 days. Planning $2,812 Reclassification for 6 months for Planning Tech III, Environmental Review Coordinator and Admin. Office Assistant III. Police $15,800 Addition of 7 computers Police $73,520 Reinstate South Bay Community Services funding for juvenile diversion, less amount of new revenue offset. Police $2,600 Police reserves stipend left out in error Police ($64,204) Transfer of Police Community Relations Coordinator to Personnel Department QWL/Training Coordinator subject to further evaluation and report back within 30 days. Public Works $40,890 Program costs for sewer billing - new position in Engineering. This amount includes support costs for position. Public Works $56,475 Minor CIP's additionally approved with full revenue offset. Public Works $134,580 Transfer of Environmental Resources Manager and Conservation Coordinator and related support costs from Non- Departmental budget to the Public Works Department. Public Works ($3,970) South Bay community Services to take over graffiti maintenance along trolley line fence. 7~J j ---~_.-- ----------.---- - -----~----~----------- Item # 7 Meeting Date 6/27/95 Total $337,123 GENERAL FUND REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS Beginning Balance $35,250 Revenue from ($10,000) Deleted this new revenue Afterschool Recreation Program Revenue from Youth ($5,000) Deleted this new revenue Leagues Revenue from Swim ($25,000) Revised estimate of revenue with new Passes proposed fees Vehicle ID $1,800 New revenue Verification Security Alarm Fees $31,540 New revenue AB 939 Admin. Fee $110,000 Corrected amount. Report to approve to be presented 6/27/95. Sewer Billing $93,560 New revenues to General Fund for staff Program Revenues and program costs Alternative Funding $92,775 New revenue for Minor CIP Released CIP $46,469 Based on closing projects Revenue to General Fund Storm Drain Fee ($25,927) Reduce reimbursement from storm Drain to General Fund to actual level $345,467 OTHER FUNDS ADJUSTMENTS Central Garage Fund $10,396 Reinstate the Equipment Mechanic 1 for 3 months, vacate through attrition. Sewer Service Fund $119,550 Implementation of city Sewer Billing Program 7~r ---~------- -- -~_._------------ ---~---_._------- Item # ? Meeting Date 6/27/95 Equipment $855,855 Approval of program Replacement Fund Public Facilities $200 Correction to Fire station DIF DIF Total $986,001 SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED CIP PROJECT PROPOSED FINAL CHANGE BUDGET BUDGET STL228-0range Ave. TDA- Sidewalk $84,000 $-0- ($84,000) GAST AX- $112,500 $64,000 ($48,500) STL229-0xford Sidewalk TDA-$190,000 $141,500 ($48,500) GASTAX- $0 $48,500 +$48,500 GGl47-Reroofing ofPSB SPCAPOUT- $93,500 $-0- ($93,500) RCT- $0 $93,500 +93,500 GGI 54-LOB/CD LOWMOD- Modifications $0 $26,000 +$26,000 HOME- $0 $7,000 +$7,000 STL222-0range/4th to TPF- $138,000 $211,000 +$73,000 Third Sidewalk PR133-0tay Park CDBG-$1,098,000 Gymnasium $952,225 ($145,775) PRl88-Eastern Aquatic PAD- Complex $50,000 $0 ($50,000) RCT- $0 $50,000 +$50,000 7-S --'~----------~-----' - - ---- PROJECT PROPOSED FINAL ~~<F 7 BUDGET BUDM~ting Date 6/27/95 PR210-Lauderbach PAD- Improvements $-0- $27,900 +$27,900 GGl53-Civic Center Annex DIFCIVIC- $650,000 $1,300,000 +$650,000 PSI44-PD Locker Room Revenue Sharing- Renovations $6,150 $-0- ($6,150) RCT- $12,750 $18,900 +$6,150 OTHER CHANGES TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CIP PROJECTS PROJECT PREVIOUSLY RECOMMENDED TITLE AND APPROPRIATED and CHANGE YEAR APPROVED UNCOMMITTED FUNDS REMAINING IN PROJECT PRI52-Los Ninos Park RCT- Restrooms (FY 91/92) $33,750 ($33,750) PAD- $22,570 ($22,570) LDl05-MTDB Right of FEDRS- Way Landscaping (FY $6,158 ($6,158) 89/90) GF33- TELEGRAPH GENERAL FUND- CANYON FLOOD $40,311 ($40,311) CONTROL- MONTGOMERY (FY 86/87) 7-" .~ ----- --------.- - -~-~--~~--_. Item # ~ Meeting Date 6/2 /95 SUMMARY OF NET CIP CHANGES: IDA ($132,500) SPCAPOUT ($ 93,500) RCT +$149,650 LOWMOD +$ 26,000 HOME +$ 7,000 TPF +$ 73,000 CDBG ($145,775) PAD ($22,100) DIF +$650,000 REVSHARING ($ 6,150) TOTAL CIP CHANGE +$505,625 SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS Expenditure Adjustments General Fund 337,123 Other Funds 986,001 CIP Fund Adjustments 505.625 All Funds Adjustment 1,828,749 General Fund Revenue Adjustments $345,467 Expenditure Increases ($337,123) Net Gen Fund Surplus $ 8,344 Master Fee Schedule Update Attachment D provides detail on the actual amendments to the Master Fee Schedule which are required as a result of the actions taken by city Council in providing a balanced budget. The detail provides the amendments for fees for : alarm permits, equipment violation reinspection, vehicle ID verification, privately-initiated negligent vehicle tows, high-hazard permits, swimming programs, adult athletic leagues and therapeutics programs. 7-7 ~----_._---- - - ------------------------------- Item # ? Meeting Date 6/27/95 FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed all funds budget, including debt service was $104,118,105, plus adjustments requested of $1,828,749 this creates a revised all funds budget of $105,080,603. This amount includes a revised general fund operating budget of $54,663,123. Exhibits: Attached are the following exhibits: Exhibit A: Operating Budget, Special Revenue, and Capital Detail Exhibit B: Financing Sources and Uses Exhibit C: General Fund summary Exhibit D: Master Fee Schedule Update budadopt.f96 7~~ .------- -,--- --- -----~--------~._--~-- RESOLUTION NO /79 :JéJ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING ADOPTION OF THE FINAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1995 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996 AND AMENDING THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE TO INCORPORATE CHANGES TO FEES AND FINES PROPOSED IN THE 1995-96 BUDGET WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Charter of the City of Chula vista, sections 1004 and 1005, the City Council is required to adopt a budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1996, and WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared and filed with the City Clerk his proposed budget, and WHEREAS, due notice has been given by the City Clerk, as required by law, that said proposed budget is on file and open to anyone interested, and WHEREAS, a hearing has been held on said proposed budget as required by law, and WHEREAS, as a result of Council action in presenting a balanced budget, the City Council drafted and implemented a variety of new fees and fines and amendments to existing fee and fine structures as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula vista that there is hereby appropriated out of the resources, including prospective revenues, of the City of Chula vista for municipal purposes and for use by the various departments, the amounts shown in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth herein in full. The city Council finds that all appropriations contained in this resolution are within the legal spending limitations authorized by law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the appropriations attached are approved as the budget for the 1995-96 fiscal year. The city Manager and the Director of Finance are hereby jointly authorized to transfer appropriations within control accounts for all services and to transfer appropriations between control accounts for Employee Services only. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Finance may, from time to time, invest temporarily idle funds from anyone fund in legal investments permitted by law for charter cities. 1 7-9 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the interfund transfers described on Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby authorized; and any such interfund transfers described thereon as loans shall bear interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum which the City Council finds and determines is the current prime interest rate. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that revenues received from Developer Deposit Funds for projects for which consultants rather than City officers or employees are engaged are hereby continuously appropriated to the Developer Deposit Fund. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Master Fee Schedule is hereby amended to incorporate changes to fees and fines proposed in the 1995-96 budget as set forth in Exhibit D. Presented by Approved as to form by John D. Goss, City Manager Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney C:\rs\annual.bud 2 7-/ t} - Q 0> '" c.. ~ 00 OOOO~~-NO~~ ~~OOO M " ~~ ~OO~OOO-~oo- o~~~ N ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ = 00- ~N ~OO~N ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~- ~M~~ MN ~N~ M ~ ~ ~~ -~ ~N~ M ..Q U ~ ~ ~ ~ .s= ~ x ~ ,~ Oz OOOOOOO~~-NOS~OO~OOO M ! ~ - Ñ~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ! ~~~ s~8~~~g~~i~~~~i~~$~ ~ ! d~P;: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ u~o~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~S~~ ~ ~ S-~ ~ ~ ~ " 0 ~ § u ~ ¡:Q " ~ ~ Z gg~~~~~S~~~~~~~g~~~ 8 E-< . - -~OOO-~~~OM~~~~~~~-- 0 ~ ~~~ ~~MMÓÓ~~Ó~~~~~~~NÓ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ .~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ó~M ~ 0 ~~o~ ~ ~~~ -~~-~~ ~ : ~-~ ~ ~ ~ : ;:¡s ~ i ~ ~ E-< . Z ., ~ II~ >< ~Z >~~ ~ E-< ze ~ ~~~ ~ . > eE-< Z ~~~" ~ "Z E-< - ~ ~O e O~~~ < 7 0 ~ ~~¡ r'~;:¡s E-< g; ~~ E-< ¡::; - ~ I ~ ~o><~Z~~~~ z ~ ~ § ~I'.'~.' - ~~~~~-E-<OOU ~ o~~ ¡:Q l, E-< ""'0 ~E-<zt:: ~ E-< :r:::.:u " ~ ~ ~~~o;~~~~~"Ô:;j o'd~~ ~ v..--, ~ ~;:¡ ;E-<~~~¡;!;~I~~ ö¡::-,,'-.. E-< .'j ~ E-< o~ E-<~ Z ~ ",,0'" ~If.'i ~ ~ ug <uz~o ~ OÔ ~~~~ ~ I', ~ < ><:;:: >< >< 5§ ~ ~ < Z - d ~ !:î;;;: ~ ~ ~ ~ boobbo ~o~~~o~;~ê:;::æ ~ . ~ ~ U¡:Quuu< ~U~~¡::;Z~~¡:Q~~~ é 0 E-< Ë3 ~ z 00- 0 M~-O~ ooo-~o ~ ;:¡ N~ ~ -~~OON O~~~~OO -- - NNN~~ -NM~~~ ~ ~ 0 00 0 00000 ------ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~g~~~~ ~~~~~~g ~ ~ ~ E-<E-< E-<N~E-<E-<E-<E-< NE-<E-<E-<E-<E-<~ ~ 0 9 ~-OOOÓNOOO-OÓ------ Ö ~ ~ O-M~~--~~NNOM--OO-- ~ ~ E-< -----NNNN~~~~ONM~~~ < ~ Z qqqqqqqqqqqqq~~~~~~ E-< ~ 0 8888888888888888888 0 w U ------------------- E-< ~ 7'i( ~ ----- ----------- -,--~~--------- y/-¿ N QJ C'> co ~ ~ 0 ~~O, ~ ~ ~~~~ 0 ~ c:;¡~ ~ ~~~~ ~ - ~ O~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ U ~ ~~ ~ ..r::: ~ x ~ LLI ~ Š 00000000000 OOOOOOO~~~OO ~ ~ ~ ~~8bg~~~~8~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ : ~~~ ~~6~~~N~~~~ 666~N~M~~~~oo M , <~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~M~~MO~~~~ ~ ¡ d~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ a~s~~~~S~~ ~ ~ : u~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ M : ~~~ ~ ~ ê 0 ~ ~ ~ u ~ ê5 ~ Zo 00000000000 ooooooo~oooo ~ ~ ~ OOONO~M~MO~ ~N~~~~~~M~~~ ~ 0 < . ~ ~~O~~~~~MOM ~~~~~M~~O ~ M ~ ~ ~~~ ~~6~~~N~~~~ 666~N~M~~ ~ M ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~M~~~~ ~~~~~~~8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ ~ oo~~~~ N~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ N > ~ ffi~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ M ~ : V~~ ~ ~ c;: : ::is ~ V) , ~ ~ : < 0 '~ ~ ~~ E-< Z ~ ~Z -" ~ ~ ¡.; < 0 .... ~ ~ E-< LLI ~ U~ E-< ~ Q Z ~ ~ ~ E-< ~~ Õ S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E-< Z~~ ~ ~~E-< ~ ~ E-<~ c:;¡~~ ~ Z ~ ~c:;¡~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~æs~~~s~ § ~ U ~~~~ ~~ ~ E-<ZUE-<Z~~uZ ~ 0 ~ ~~~~~~~ffis~ ~~~~~~Q~~~~E c:;¡ ~ E-< Z~E-<~~E-<~Q~êô ~OQ~ê~~~~~~d ~ V) ~ ~~§~~~~~z~~ ~~~ffi~~~ËC:;¡z~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~g~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ffi ~~~o~~~oæ~~ê ~ 6 Q E-<U~~~~E-<E-<~C:;¡Q Z~OE-<~~E-<UU~~~ Z ~ ~ N ~ 0 E-< N ~ LLI Z ~~ ~ÖO 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ::J::::f;J ~oo ~ M :;;~ ~ 0 NN N;:;:;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g: ~ ~~ ~~"~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 O~ E-<E-< E-<,:.;ö E-< E-<** E-<~ "':¡: -" O~OOOOOOOMO~OOOOooooooo~ ~ ~ . .... ~~N~~O~~~OO~~~~~O~~~O~~O ~ z E-< ~~NNNMMMM~M~~~~~~~N~OOO~ < ZII N N N N N N N N N N 6" 6" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 aJ 0 =~~~~g~~~~8~:Ò~~~~~~~8¿~~ b ~ ~ U NNNNNNNNNNM~~~~~~~~~~~~~ E-< .. ¡g M OJ 0> '" "- <:( - ~ ~ ~ Ö N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ U ~ "" "" ~ Oz 0000000000 0 ~ ~ ~ ~g~g~~~~g~ g N ~~~ OOOONÓ~~~OOOON ~ ~ <:(~~ ~~""O--~-""M ~ ~ d~~ ~"" ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ , u~~ "" "" "" ~ ! ê3~~ "" : 0 ~ ! u ~ CI) ~ Zo 0000000000 0 ~ ~ . ~ ~g~g~~~~g~ g ~ ~~ ~~~ OOOONÓ~~~OOOON ~ ~ ~~~ ~~""O--~-""M ~ ~ ~ .~~ ~"" ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ q ~~~ "" "" "" ~ i ::E æ i ~ ~ ~EJ~ ~ Z gj Ö CI) ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ § ~ ~~~~ æ ~ CI) Q ~ ~ ....:IÖ U 0 ~ ~ u ~~~ z~ ~ ö ~ -< ~~~ ~~ ~ § ö ~ -<~Qö ogj~ -< ~ ~ Z ~~~~~~~~ ~ ö ~ ~ ~SSB~~Ô~§§ ~ ~ ~ ~@~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ Q u~6~~~~o~....:I ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ CI)~ ~ ~ ¿".!.~ 00 ....:I 0 ~~~ ~ <:( ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ -< ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ....:I ~~~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 00000-0000 0 ~ ~ ~ NN~-~ON~-M ~ ~ ~ OM~~~~~~~~ < ~~~~~~~~~~ m 0 ~~~~~~~~~~ b ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ö 7..../ J ~ ~~-- -.------------ "'" OJ C> ~ ,-.. ,-..,-..,-" ,-.. ~ ¡1J 00000 00 00 0 ~ ~~ Ö g ~ ~~S ~~ gg g ~ ~~ ~ ~ M ¿ M~Ñ Ñ ~Ô ¿ ~ ~~ :I: ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ U '-'~'-' ~ ~ ~ ~_. ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ .<:: X u.J Zo ~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OO~ ~~ - ~g~S~gg~g~~~~g~~~g~~gg~gg~ ~~ ~~ ~Ô~~ÔÑÔ ÔM¿ÔÔ~~~~~~¿~ÔM¿~Ô ~Ô ~~ NO-~~-N -~~NON~~V~--~~~N~~ ~~ : ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~a~~~~~~~ ~~~ : ~~ : ~~ ~ ~ ~-O : - ex: ~ ~ >- ¡:>.. -<: ~ ,...¡ ... ::;¡ 0 Oz ~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOO 0 ~ ~ ~OOO~OO~O~OOOO~~OO~O~~~~OO ~ 0 - ~O~-NOO-ONO~~O~VOO~~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~~ ~Ó~~Ó~Ó¿.Ó~~ÑÓ~~~~~~¿ M ~¿ M~ ~ ~~ NO-~~~N~-~VVON~~~~-- ~ ~O ~- ~ ~2 ~~~~~~~ ~~~~a~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ <: ~¡:>.. N - - 0 ~ U ~O ~ ~ ~ ~ S =' ~ , ¡:>.. ¡ ~ ~ -<: ~ ri~ > ~ ~Õ >- æ§~ 5~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ æ ~~~ ~~æ~ ~§ ~~~ ~ ~ ... ~2; -::;¡ < ... ~o~ 0 ¡1J ~ ~ ~~uöðo~ðæ§~~ zzo~~~~ ~ - ,...¡~ffi~~='~~~~...~~~U¡1J gg~~õ~~~~ ~ Z -<:... 2;~ "'~-z~='u """u~='~::;¡_z ¡1J ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~8g~8~~~§~~~~~~~ð; § ~ ... u~ö;.<o¡:>..~~~,...¡,...¡uu2;~~ 22¡;;¡g¡1J~o!::1:!:! a:I ~ .=' -<: ~oz~-<:...-<:-=, =' ~~ ~uu ~6 ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ g ~~ u~¡:>......,~...-ex:....,~cx:¡:>.....~...~............uu¡:>..,...¡¡:u -<: S::... ~ t.f 0 ¡1J ... ~ ~ ö 5 ... ... § 0 0 0 ¡:Q U ... ...,...¡ U ~ ~ ~-<: -<: 0'" ,...¡ ~- 9 NO--~OOO-N~V~~~~oooo~o~ooo ~u ~ ~~OO~~-OOOOOOOOONM-~ONO~VN Ö Ö ... -NM~N~OOOOOOOOOOOONN~O~~O~ Z NNNNNN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 ~~g~~~~ggggg8ggg~8~~~~~~g~ U NNNNNN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~V~ 7-/'/ --~~-- - ~ .------~ II ~g~~~~~~~o~~~o~~ g~g~~~N g g ~ ~ßNNNNNNN~""""'~~~ ~~~......~~ - - ~ II f ß -_ß~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ -~IINNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNN N N N ~~ß~,,~~~~~,~~~~, ~"~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 =~--~~~~~-~~~~- ~--~~~~ ~ N N ~ 5 Ii ~ ~ '" Z ü:;:;:;:; ~ ~ ~ :; 'j N II~~~~ ~~ cc ~ ~ 5 ",ii:::: .... .3.3:::: :::: u.J ~ë¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡~i~fn~i~i~ii~~i~i ~>.>.~~~~ ¡¡ ¡¡ ~ ¡:¡ 5!!~¡g¡g¡g :e¡¡~ 5-.:-.:55~~ ~ ~ ~ (/) ","0 >:;.... ~::::~~oo '" 0 0 "," ,-~~------- LL uu U =~~~~¡~~¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ i~~ii~~ ~ ~ ~ ß~~~~,~~""", ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ñ~~~~¡¡ii~¡¡¡¡¡¡~¡¡~ ~~~~~:: ~ ~ : ñ~~~~¡g~~~i¡g¡g~i~ ~55~~~~ ~ ~ ~ II II .................... ............ .... ... .... .. II U U U U u............ U U U ~ ~.... ~ ~ ~........ ~ ~ U U U ~ - II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ñ999QQ999QQ9~t;¡¡; ~~~99~~ Q 9 Q ~ """"ãSãS......ãSãS..~~ãS ~~~....~~ ãS.. ãS - :1 .. ~ ffi ¡¡ ~ .... .... ~ ñ:.""'" ~ ~~~ ¡¡~~ .... .. 110 ~I!! .... .. ~ ~~~ I!! '" :::t ,,-:t ~ - U :. '" "- "- :t !Z ~ ~ ß Ii!.... Ii! Ii! "-.................. ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡¡... ~ ~ .... Ii! ~ ~ ~ ñ ~ ~ ~ ~.... Ii! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0"" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~"""'---!lE""'-"-"-"-"-""'~ ",- "- '" .. n~Ii!~~¡¡:~Ii!Ii!Ii!Ii!Ii!:!!~~ ~~~....Ii!~~ Ii! ~ ~ ~ Ii ~~~¡¡¡~~~~~~¡j~~ iSiSiS~~iSiS ~ U is .. IIU-"" ..-----...."'0 """""'--""" - U '" ~ II-"""""" """""""""U'" """"'".....'" ... - '" :!; :I:::~~~~::i~~~~~~..~ ..........."'~....... ~:::.... ~ ß~"'~~~~"""""""'511§::i æææt;"'ææ '" ~ æ ~ 1I....1!i~~"-",I!iI!iI!iI!iI!i,,-~,,, ooo..l!ioo I!i.... 0 ;;: ~ II !i! ~ II " " II 0 0 ~ iJ Ii ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ßo~:::o '" i!i~::!!i!"" ~ 0 .. :I!i3~!!i!!i!i!i!;::;;!i2i!i i3 ! ... II~ >~""!!;!"~"" -, ~ U ~!i~~~1<::~:;~~:!;~g~ ~ ~ ~1:~õ:..~!i~..~!I:';!Z6~u !i!!i!!i!!i!!i!!i!!i! õ: ~ '" ß ~ ð! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ f ~ ~ 2222222 ð ~ ~ Ü ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ Š ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U § II ~ - ~ -.... '" z - '" - "-.... ~ '" '" '" ~ '" '" '" ~ - ~ II~U ~"'!!:I!!""~z--~ """""""""'" U ~ ñ g ~ ri ~ S ~:;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ '" II '" U I: g"g~::¡;;: I: ~ ~ ~ 1;; ::¡, ::i II z" 0 '" II ooo~~"" II .. .. z > 0 0 "- .... II " " " '" ~ '" .. 011 ~~~'" "-- '" ... II '" '" - 0 ñ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e::i ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > > > "'........ ~ ~ '" n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::i::i::i!Z ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ i3 ß ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" 51 ~ '" U ~ ~ U il~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ i ßg~ggg~gggog$~g ~ ~~g~~~i ~ ~ g ~ """N~OOO~oo~~-"'~o ~ N~O~~N~ ~ ~ N ~ ~"n~~¿i¿~~¿~~¿¿~~ i ¿~¿i~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n~"'~ ~~~~ ~-...~- N ~~O_~~$ ~ ~ ~ ~ II' . ~ ~ ~. . ~ :: N 7..1 ~ ~ - N ~ ... ~n ~~ i.<~ - - - - - ::;:: ... '" '" - 0 -0 CO .... '" "'::~ ~ !" !" ~ ~ !i ~ '" -'" ~ '" ~- CO -0 '" ~ "'" '" .... ~ ~ ....- '" '" """ '" "'--... 0 .... "'" ... ð 0 ....'" 0 CO'" '" CO...."'... 0 CO 0" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ S ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ 0 0 0 ...'" S S ss ! 05",~ S S S" S 0 0 0 0 ~ w ~ w w w ~ ~ ~ ~" .- :::::: :::::: \:1 ~ \:1 ~ ~ ~ \:1 \:1 \:1 \:1:: ~ ........ """":;:) '" :;:) '" '" ",:;:) :;:) :;:) e:: §~~ ~~/!' w/!' www/!'/!'/!'.-:: "'::!!::!! ::!!::!!~ :::~ :::::::::~~~~II w-- c: <c: «<c:c:c:c:" m n n nn '" '" '" '" '" "'" m m mm 0 ~O ~~~O 0 0 0" 0 c: c: c: c: " .... m ~ ~ ~~ '" """'" "0 .. c: c: c: c: 0 000 " ; :::: DÎ DÎDÎDÎ Ii '" 0 0 0 0 " < '" '" 0 0 " - " ~ " "'........ ......" ww w",ow»o;!!n" e :: ~ ~~ ~ ¡B i:Jl:;;~ ¡a i!! ~!! '" - :II: :II: :II: .- ~ '" .... - .-" § ~ ~ ~ i ~ 00 0 n i w w n ;:: '" ~ ~ ~ ~:II: ~ ~ ~ i 0:;:) ~ ~ ~:: w-m m....m -WCO<N""'" m""" ",n.... """ ",....",-c:",-<" '" m '" 0 n '" »0 " ~ - -" '" '" '" '" c: m m '" W" '" ,,- - '" m m m n .... -< m"!i! n ~" ,,~~ ~;¡¡ ~:::p:!~~~~:: :; ~¡:g ¡:g~¡s ~~ ~i~¡S¡Siñ:: -< ~~.... mm m z 0 m" 0 ::: . <':!~ ~E~ Wi! ;; '" '" '" "Z " 0 " ~ w "c: c: -< ".- '" w "»0 " ~ 0-- --!¡¡ !¡¡!¡¡ o.-.-w".-.-" ;: ;:g:g i!!i!!m mm ~!i!!i!\2I2..;:: ~ ....""" ........~ ~~ ~""":;::ñ~~11 '" w n '" nn.... ........ ....""" m '" "'" »0 :;:)!¡¡!:: ~~z """ z~~~w-<-<:: 1i < c: ~ ~~ ~»o»o"'c:WW" - -....'" WW -<-«"mm" '" ~ ~ 8 :;:):;:) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ñ ~ ::!! ~::;!! '" " - ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ñ ñ II '" ~ ==:;1: ww2 22 !i! ~ mm::~ !i ~~~ ........ ........ .... ~ ~~::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~¡¡ : z .... ...." c: »0 " W ~ ~ - ~ - -< »0 »0 »0 »0" .. ...... .. ~ :¡¡ ~ ~ n ~ ~ 6 6 ~ 6 ~ ~ 6 6 ~ 6 II ~ ~ .... c: ë! c: c: '" '" ~ '" '" ~ ~ .... .... ...." W -0 »0 »0 »0 »0 »0 m m m m m m m »0 »0 »0" - '" n.-.- .-.-.... ........ ................nnn"w .... .... .... ...." " " - - "" - --0 -00-0 ~ - -" ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~I¡ ~ š š ~~ SlE SI' E SI 5I!i 5. ~ ~ 5.5. C ~~ ~CC~ C ~ ~:: n - - nn - - --- - " "-c-c ",,- ,'" ,--"'- ," 0 ~ 11 0" »0 o~ o»o~~ I 0 o::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 8 ~'" ~8i!'" ~ ~::¡:¡ n 0 "" "0 5 ~~ ~55~ ~ ~::!! f;i :!:'!i'Ø :!::!:~ ..~ ..~~~~....:::;; 0 " ~ ~ " " " - ". "" " c:: E E "'" '" ,,:: ~ .... .... »0"" »0 .... »0 »0" '" m ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~::':' '" 5 5 ....:: 5 ¡ ¡ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 '" '" '" 00 0 ........ """""" co .... "'"""" , " ," , , , , " , , '" m.. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "'" ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~::-- :: ~ ?- /~ ~ :g:g :g:g s ~s ~!!:8:S S s s!!~ '" '" '" "'0 0 "'0 ""000 0 0 0::- " II .Co 0 0 0 O~ 00 0 0 0 00 ~IIO N 0 0 0 00- 0 0 0 00 ~Ii~ ., ~ ~ ~ ~o- ~ ~ ~ f :: ~.C~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~IIN N N N NN NN N N N NN :1i~!I,g Ii; ~ g ~~ .0.0 ~ i; PI go II'" '" '" '" ...... ...... ......... <> ~ ~ § !I co ~ II W NI: cc ¡;C ::::::::: -' N I: ~~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w~ 11 11 ~ Æ ~ ~ ~!15 5 ~ ~:: :: ~ ~ ~ 55 u !:!I:~ s ~ ~ ~~ 5~ :¡,:¡,:¡, QQ V) :;::: "'t:t:~~ ~~ ooo:l:l C = = ! ! -- "" " a a .. .. .. "" II~ ~ ~ ~ -- -- 0 0 0 ~~ II " " " " ~ ~ ~ II ~~ ~~ '" '" '" ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ "' , , '" " "'" C8 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ = = = ~~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ a!l~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ ~ 9 9 ~ ~ !!: II'" '" '" '" .. as .. as as.... '" '" ~ ~ ð ; ~ II ~ ~ 6 ~ "" z 0 ~ ~ C 3 ~ ~ ~ II U ~ ~ ~ '" II ~:5 ~ ~::~ ~ ~ ð ðð ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 '" ~Cwwww '5'5 '5'5'5~~ '" IIUUUU~~ """ """"'00 :!; ::;;;;;;;;33""" """",¡j¡j U II~ ~ ~ ~...... zz z z z Z IIW W W W ...... - - - ~~ '" """""""~~ ~~ ~~~uu :!; C~ ~ ~ ~ """ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ww ~ """""~~ ww wwwoo '" :: ~ ~ ~ ~ :¡:¡ 15 15 !!;!!;!!; g: g: :;; ;; 15 ~ '" "'" ~ ii ~ i W ~'" ~ II ~ ~ - ~ 2 ~ ~~ II ~ U - ~ .. " ~ II W W ~ ~"'~oo ~ II ~ ~ ~ "'~"'oo ¡;; !i:: ¡:¡ ~ U ~i!::!;~~ ~ II U ... Z W ~II~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ffi §§ II~ > ~ ~~, ~, U - :E ~ ~ ¡;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ...... "'" 0 '" ~ "'.. "'.. ::Ii... ~ UU II II C 8 ~ ~ g ~ ~ II '" '" '" '" U U ~ i i i i ~ ~ ð ð II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 II ~ ~ ~ ~ W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i i i 11- - - - uu ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ II> > > > """ ~ ~ ~ ~~ C ffi ffi ffi ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II '" '" '" '" 0 0 IS ¡¡¡ '" '" '" '" '" I: ~ ~ ~ ~ :::::: .. ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi """""~~ ~~ zzzzz IIW W W W """ uu W W W WW II 0 0 0 0 .... .. .. '" '" '" '" '" "~ 0 <> 0 o-~ ~ 00 0 S S S ~= ~ ~CN ~ ~ g ~~ ~ ~~ = ~ ¡¡¡ ~ ~~ ~ ¡zCÒ ~ ~ Ò ~~ ~ Ñ~ ~ ~ ~ Ò ~Ò ~ II~ '" ~ '" <>0- <> ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~... ... C'" ~~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~::~ <> ..., 0- 0 ~ N '" ... 7-/7 ~::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N " '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" " m '" '" - ° '" co",""" ::~ .- ~ ~ ~¡¡! J ~ = ~ ~ ~Q~ a ~ '" ~ ~~" '" þ '" ° co "'°'" - '" ° '" "'-" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~"- ~ ~ ~ g Ð ~8S s ~ ~ ~ §i" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " .. .. .. ~ .. .. iii .. .... iii Z " : : : E ~~"': ~ ~ "'~i¡ ~ ~ ~ '" ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~:: < < < - ~~'" < ~ ~ "'~" - - - z nn< - n n <c:" nnnlO n- z" m m m ~~~ m ~ ~ ~o" " --c: - - c: ,,- ~ ~ ~ '" -_z ~ - - z "O c:c:c:o --oc:-- 0" ~ ~ ~ £ :;::;:'" ~ :;::;: "':: :S!èj¡èj¡;; oo~~~~ ~!! ¥""",~ ~~ "'~~ " c: " ~ H ! ! ! ~ ~ ~! ! ~ ~ 5 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .." '" '" "'.. --~ - - ~~" i i i nnc: n n " ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ i i ~ - - - nnco - n n """" nnn" ",n --" '" 000 0 0 """"~ """0 -- n-- c:c:,,'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~- --,,- \!J\!J\!J~ ~"~~~,, ii" -< - - - ~ -oz - 0 " 0 "~i 1; .. ~ --" ~ e¡;¡m ¡: e ¡;¡ ~~q Q - '" is - ~ ~ " c: m~-< m ~ c:c:" ~ "'~'" " '" ~ zz" ~ n ~ n 00 ~ - - - z ~n~ 0 ~ ~ ~~" ;: :g:g:g2 ",;:!i!:::""" !i!!i!:: ~ þ þ þ '" zzz - z z zz" - " z """"'z 00"""00 """" ~ m~~10 ~~~~~~ !¡¡!¡¡II ¡!¡ '" --~ < - ~~" - ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ ¡;¡ g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 1; --,,'" 2 ~ ~ ~ ! !¡~ ¡!; :: m :;: iii ~ Ii" 0 0 0 z "c: '" '" '" " '" n .. ~ :;: ~ -< " - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~!:'¡ !:'¡ !:'¡:¡¡ !:'¡ !:'¡!:'¡ !:'¡ ~ :: ~ ~ I ¡ ¡¡¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡¡~ ;: ;: ;: , , " " " " " ~ ~ ~ <! <! <! <! <! <! <! <! <! :1 i ; ; i iii i i i ii~i g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,,~ rr1 ., ., ., " m '" 2' 2' 2' !! i= :!. :!. :!. "I:! rr1 g g g :i 5 "" II , ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ¡¡~"'~ , , " , " , " , , " m .. '" '" '" '" """'" '" '" '" """"~- . ~ . ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~n-- - " I 7-/ r ~ 8 '" '" co co '" '" co co '" - ¡i ~ '" '" 0°'" ° '" '" "'o,,~ ° '" """'" '" ° ° "'O"- n II !~ggg~~~~~ gg~~ ~ WII--""""""'¡¡: -"""'" '" '" Ü if::: - - - -..::RRR>:>::!:!:! RRRR R -~IINNNNN"""'" NNNN N ~~ß",~"" ~~~~ ~ 0 !!¡s:¡s:¡s:g;¡s:¡s:¡s:¡s: g;g;g;g; g; ~ II : : 5 II .. .. "" 7 Ii ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ Ii ~,,]]] ~~ :::> IIU u,3.-.-.- uu.... '" W II.. ..,... ~ ~ ~ .. .. Ii. ¡¡, ~ ill:¡~JL¡]]] ~::: ~ V> :;:ßO!!O !!ggg 008.8. .:i! IIU-U --- uu>->- - IIU-U ---- uu-- - II-~---~~~ --~~ ~ II>~>-~ ».... ~ ::~,~~~~~~ ~~~~ ü:~:~~;;; :::: ~ ßi~i~,~~~ ii~~ ~ 110-00"'"""", 00-- 0 II II ~ II ... ~... ~ ~......... ............ ~ ~ - II ewe W wee ~ ~ ~ ~ c W ~ ~ ß ~ § ~ ~ § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I m ~ ~ m ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ... - ~.. - ~ ~W ~mu ~m W ~ II:::::: ~~~ :::~ ~ => II .. 000 .. W .. .. ::~~ !!! ~;;;~... II ... - m m m ... W m ~ ~ II ~ Z ~ ~ ß ~ ~ m ~ ~ g g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ... ß ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :!; ::;; ~~~~~~ ;;~i!i~ ~ ~ li¡¡¡~~¡¡¡š~~~ ¡¡¡~~~ ~ - II~""" "'...... ~"""'" ~ ~ IIm~m~wg;g;g; mmg;g; i3 ~ :::é:¡:¡~~!!;--- :é:~-- .. > C II 5 :: Q :: II ~ II . - 0 II ~~-~~~ ~~ ~ II UU UUU cow w ... II ww"'www """~ '" ~ II ~~~~~~~ ......~ ~ ~ !'i:: ~~~u~~~ --~ ~ ~ Ü ~::: ~::: ~ '" '" ~ ~ ::2!:::.!:::.!:::.!:::.!:::.!:::.!:::. 2~~;;; R Ü ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ æ II '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ",;:¡ .. Ü ~ 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ II ~ m m m m m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ... c 0 I: ~ ~ i!i IIW 0 ~~i& ~ON'" ~ ::~ :;:c ¡¡:""" ~:;::;::;: Z II Z Z 0 ~ ß a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ ~ ~ II '" => '" ... => => => => => => 0 011... ~w ~~~ -~~~ '" ~ II ~ W - ... ß ~ ~ ~!'i ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ => - U ~ - - - W - - - Z II ,~> ~ > > > ~ > > > ü ~ ~ ¡¡¡ ~ ~ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ~ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ~ II '" '" '" m .. Ü 5 ~ ~ 5 c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II m ~ 0 m moo 0 ~ 0 0 0 '" ~~~iiiii~¡ i ~ii¡ 0 io iz Ii <j."~"<j."'i."i£i&"'!J" ~. ~'f:::"~"ì!' g" / II~~~- -~'" ~ ..-¡S:N '" II ~~ .~~ . .~~~ ~ :t ;~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ? - /q 7-).6 '" II I. '-' UJ -' 5 æ ~ '" íñ ... ~ ... ;:! ~ ¡!! ~ ~ ...' ,;; 0' N' .. ... '" '" 10 ... co 10 lOCO 0 , ' I' N NI' 0 ~ 0 10 g N M cr... IX; ~ 'j>§ Ñ ... M CO ~ ~ '" N ~ N ' N N I' ... 10 10 10 0 0 ~ "'10 OIOOOOO~OOOO"'COO CO Ô~ÔÔ~Ô @~ ~~~888~8g~8~;:!8 ~ ~~~~~8 " """"""'" ,"'" ~ 10 1"" ON"'OCOO"'MIOMO~"'IO '" IOCOONMO '" ~ ~ ~~ """~~I'~~~ MIO"'~'" ~ ~~~~~~ ~ cr ... ' , , ,~~ M 10 ~¡;¡ N ... ~ ~ '" I' 0 0 '" 0 i Ê ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~5~ 8 ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ Ii! 1~~ld~n;~¡I~ ~ i ¡ ~ ~I~~ ~ ~ i ~;~ ~~~~illh~d~~~ ~ ~ 1~~§9~~~ ~ ï II Iln~uunnn I i nilhU I ;« ..¡ iii ú ci rzi r.:ci := 7~d..1 /7-,1,2 Exhibit "0" QHA~TER II Page ~ Records. Documents. Research and Processine: Fees C. POLICE 1. Records and Documents The Police Chief is authorized to furnish any person applying therefor any of the following documents, papers or official records of tbe Police Department upon payment of the fOllowing fees: a. Accident Reports - $~ 10.00 per copy b. Crime Reports - $~ 10.00 per copy c. Photograpbs - $12.00 per copy d. Record Check Letter Request - $2.00 each 2. Processing a. Fingerprint Requests The Police Chief shall furnish fingerprint identification service to any person applying therefor upon payment of a fee for City residents ....................... $-&.00 10.00 for non-residents of the City of Chula Vista. . . . . . . .. $w'w 20.00 7-.;2.] ------.-------.- ---------------.---- - .------------ _..~------- --------~------ Ex. "0" Pg. 2 £!!A~IEß Y Library A. SERVICE FEES 1. Library Cards a. Resident card - no charge b. Replacement of Lost Card - $bOO 2.00 c. Non-California Resident Card - $~ 30.00/yr 2. Audio Visual a. Insurance Charge - $~ 15/year b. Video Cassette Reserve - $O.50titem 1.QQjitem 3. Books a. Book Reserve - $Q.5Qiitem 1.QQjitem b. Interlibrary Loan - $9.5(:}/item 1.QQjitem 4. Darkroom a. Use Fee - $4.00/hr 5. Lost Items a. ~ $10.00 processing fee added on to the retail price of any lost book or audio-visual item B. FINES 1. Overdue Charges a. Books Adults $~ t1Q. per day per item Children $~ t1Q per day per item b. Audio-Visual - $3.00/day 2. AudioNisual a. Cassette Rewinding - $1.00/each ?;~r -----...-.-----------------. .--- .------------------------ Ex. "b" P9.3 ~!!ArI~R YI Police A. AlARMS 1. Alarm Use Permit A nonrefundable fee shall accompany each application for an alarm user permit as follows: a. A fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) for Both BusiDess aDd residential applications. b. A twenty dollar ($20.00) residential renewal fee will be required every twenty-four (24) months. (Per budget actions, 6/94) £,. In the case of alarm permits for commercial customers. the fees shall be as follows: U A fee of forty dollars ($40.00) iU Afortv dollar ($40.00) renewal fee will be required every twentY-four (24) months. D. VEHICUlAR .L Equipment Violation Reinspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10.00 b Vehicle ID Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10.00 b Privately-Initiated Ne2ligent Vehicle Impound Fee (NVIF) ........................$55Nehicle 4. Negligent Vehicle Impound Fee (NVIF) (in the Public Right of Way) .......................$55Nehicle (Per budget actions, 6/94) 7'-,2~ ':ir --.-.__..__............_---~----- Ex. "0" Pg. 4 ÇH~~~~R Y1.1. Recreation Proarams/Facilities B. PROGRAMS 1. Swimming a. Classes. Fees for various Parks and Recreation Department programs and classes shall be as follows. Non-Resident surcharge is 50%: Resident w/Non-Resident Adult/Youlh Adult 1. Beginners swimming $22/participant $33.00/participant 2. Advanced swimming $22/participant $33.oo/participant 3. Tiny Tots swimming $22/participant $33.00/participant 4. Parents and tots swimming $22/pair $33.oo/pair Re,olution 17905. Moy 23. t995 b. Pool Passes ABBlial: Faæil} $59 8eBier $39 Adult $19 Chih! $15 Daily: $.75 per perseB Quarterly: Family - $50 (Memorial Day throug:h Labor Day) Other Dates - Purchase Quarterly Pass or Purchase Daily Admission Senior - $35 Adult - $45 Child - $15 (Memorial Day throu!!h Labor Day) Other Dates - Purchase Daily Admission Quarters: Quarter 1: January - March Quarter 2: April - June 7'~ .~---- - -----_._---~~-----------_. -----------.---.. Ex. "0" Pg. 5 Ouarter 3: July - September Ouarter 4: October - December c. Daily Admission Fee" Child: $1.00 Adult: $1.50 Senior: $1.00 . Rewu,ion 17905 - M.,. 23.1995 !t Child Group Rate for Pool Usa!!e A rate of $0.75 per child will be char!!ed for all !!roups using the pool from Memorial Day through Labor Day who are actiye members of a Youth Coalition !!roup: including. but not limited to the YMCA. the Boys and Girls Club. Healthy Starts. Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts. etc. C. FACILITY USE £ Adult Athletic Leagues Adult Athletic Lea!!ues shall pay a Maintenance Surcharge of $50 per team per season. For non-resident leagues. the Maintenance Surchar!!e fee is additionally increased by 50%. 2., Therapeutics Pro!!ram All persons who wish to participate in a city-sponsored Therapeutics Program shall pay an annual membership fee of $30.00: $40.00 per year for non- residents. 7-2? -------~_. J CHAPTER XV Ex. "0" Pg. 6 Fire DeDartment Fees A. PERMITS +. rlammable and/or Combtlstible Liqtlid Storage Tank3 a-. Installation (per tank).. $50 b-. Removal (per tank)......$SO * ï These items have been incorporated into the fee schedule below. The fees for these two permits have been increased to more accurately reflect the time required to complete the involved inspections.] The following fees are based on an inspection/review of the activity to be conducted. Issuance of a permit is contingent upon compliance. ~ En Freauencv ADDlicabllitvlComments Assembly"" $65 AnnuallylEach Concerts and/or large public gatherings. Exits, access, occupant Occurrence load, concessions. Firefighting personnel deemed required to standby during event shall be paid for by the applicant. Auto Wrecking $65 Annually Automobile wrecking yard operation. Access, storage, welding, Yard cutting, fire protection devices. Candles and Open Annually Use of open flame/ candles In connection with assembly areas, Flame - Assembly Area $50 dining areas of restaurants or drinking establishment. Carnival & Fairs $65 Each Operation of a carnival or fair. Exits, access,emergency Occurrence lighting ,seating , occupant load, fire protection devices. Combustible Fiber $65 Annually Storage or handling of fibers in quantities in excess of 100 cu. ft. Ex: Storage cotton, sisal, jute, hemp, bailed waste, hay, straw, etc. Combustible Material $120 Annually Storage of more than 2500 cu. ft. gross volume of combustible Storage empty packing cases, boxes, barrels or similar containers. Compressed Gases $80 AnnuallylEach Storage, transportation on site, dispensing, using or handling Occurrence compressed gases. Each tank will be inspected to meet U.F.C. standards on an annual basis or when tanks are newly installed or removed. Cryogens $75 Annually Any business that produces, stores or handles Cryogens In excess of 1 gallon and less than 60 gallons, depending upon type. Dry Cleaning Plants $65 Annually Dry cleaning operations or to change to a more hazardous cleaning solvent after annual permit issued. Dust Producing $65 Annually Grain elevator/ feed mill operations, plant pulverizing operations, Operations aluminum, coal, cocoa, magnesium, spices, sugar or other operations producing explosive dusts from the processing of materials. Explosives or Blasting $65 AnnuallylEach Manufacture, storage, sale, display, or disposal of explosive Agents Occurrence materials; and/or transportation or use of explosive materials commonly used for blasting operations. 7 - .,l~ ---~---- --- ----- -- .---.------- ._--------~----------_._. --------.- tx. "0" ~g. / Fireworks $100 Annually! Manufacture, display, storage or use of pyrotechnic special effects Each material. Site location, wind direction, types of devices used, test Occurrence detonation, fire protection. Organizations providing evidence of Federal Tax-exempt status will be permitted fee waiver. Garages for Motor $75 Annually Structures used as a place of business for repairing motor vehicles. Vehicle Repair Flammable and corrosive materials use, disposal, and storage. Hazardous Materials $150 Annually Storage, transportation on site, dispensing, use or handling of Use & Storage hazardous materials. High-Piled $75 Annually Use of any building or portion thereof exceeding 2500 SF. for high- Combustibles Storage piled combustible storage. Liquefied Petroleum $65 Annually! Per tank over 125 gal. aggregate water capacity. Inspect tanks for Gases Each durability, shut-offs & location, vehicular protection. Occurrence Oven, Industrial $50 Annually Location, construction & operation of industrial baking & drying Baking or Drying ovens which are heated with oil or gas fuel. Spraying or Dipping! $65 Annually Spraying or dipping operation utilizing flammable or toxic vapor- Flammable finishes producing liquids: paint, varnish, lacquer, stain; dip tanks, spray guns. Tents, Canopies & $65 Each Erection or operation of a tent or air-supported temporary Temporary Membrane Occurrence membrane structure having an area in excess of 200 sq. ft. or Structures canopy in excess of 400 sq. ft. Access, structural stability, flame retardancy, fire protection appliances, exits, etc. Welding & Cutting $50 Annually Welding and cutting operations in a building. Ventilation, equipment Operations '. test certifications. StorageTanks $100 Each Installation, operation, repair or modification of pipelines, equipment (Flammable and/or occurrence or facilities where flammable or combustible liquids are produced, Combustible Liquids)- (Per Tank) processed, dispensed, stored, handled or used. Tanks to be INSTALLATION inspected for design & construction, and soil compaction. StorageTanks $125 Each Removal, abandonment, placing temporarily out of service, or (Flammable and/or Occurrence otherwise disposing of a flammable or combustible liquids storage Combustible Liquids)- (Per Tank) tank. Vessel must be inspected for penetration - tanks shall be REMOVAL triple-washed, purged with dry ice & removed from ground. Costs relating to soil tests for contamination to be borne by the applicant. Tanks - Storage of $75 Annually Storage, handling, or use of Class I, II, or III-A liquids in excess of Flammable or specified amounts. Combustible Liquids Christmas Tree Lots $50 Each Operation of an area used for the sale of Christmas trees. Electrical Occurrence safelY, access, flame-retardancy, fire protection, etc. .. Definition of Assembly: The gathering together of 50 or more persons for such purposes as deliberation, education, Instruction, worship, entertainment, amusement, drinking, dining, or awaiting transportation. a:\mfsprop.tbl 7-2; ,"I ----- --."--.- - --"----~--"---------~-------_. -----. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT r Item Meeting Date 6/27/95 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of Rate Decrease for Collection and Disposal of Refuse, Residential Curbside and Yard Waste Recycling RESOLUTION /79fjO Approving Rate Schedules for Collection and Disposal of Refuse, Residential and SUBMITTED BY: Yard Waste ReCYClingEffe~ 7/1/95 D~uty city ~n~~p ~ Principal Managem nt 'Assistant Snyde REVIEWED BY: City Manager~Þ\ (4/5ths vote: Yes- No---X-) This report describes proposed changes to the existing rates charged by Laidlaw Waste Systems, the city's franchised hauler, as a result of a number of changes to different components of the rate. Although some of the components may be proposed to increase and some to decrease, the overall effect on the final rates is a significant decrease from the existing rates for both residential and commercial customers. For council's consideration, the report also addresses the cost of establishing of a new administrative component of the overall rate as allowed by Public Resources Code section 41901. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving the rate schedules to be effective 7/1/95 which: 1) removes the temporary disposal surcharge, 2) lowers the ongoing disposal component based on anticipated landfill fees, 3) increases the franchise fee by 1/2%,4) approves an AB939 administrative fee of 1%, and 5) reduces recycling and yard waste rates. Approval of these components will result in an overall reduction in the total rate. It is not recommended at this time that a 2.5% cpr increase for the franchised hauler be approved. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Recent Rate Historv and Related Actions The most recent rate change for the collection and disposal of refuse was implemented effective 3/1/95 as a temporary increase for four months. The increase allowed Laidlaw Waste Systems, the City's franchised hauler, to recover approximately $595,000 in disposal fees paid to the County of San Diego from 10/1/94 to 2/1/95 when the tip fee for Chula vista (and nine other cities) was increased from $55/ton to $74/ton. The temporary recoupment period has ended and the surcharge should be deleted from the rate structure. Additionally, the County and the Solid Waste Authority have announced plans to lower the disposal cost at the landfill from $55/ton to $47.50/ton effective 7/1/95 for all system users. This action J5) ...---------- Page 2, Item ~ Meeting Date 6/27/95 creates another reason to project rate adjustments for the next year. It is also time for an annual review of curbside and yard waste recycling rate charges. Trash Rate structure For background, Council approved a methodology in August 1991 for the calculation of refuse collection and dispc;>sal rates. with that change, the ratepayer's total cost of servJ.ce is broken down into several components. These components are briefly described below in terms of how they are determined and what their status is currently. (How they are proposed to chanqe as a result of the recommendations included in this report is described further on in more specific detail.) 0 Landfill disposal fee- Paid to landfill operator for disposal; amount set by operator. Cost is passed through to ratepayer as a proportion of the change (increase or decrease) in the tip fee to be paid at the landfill. Because of the volatile and expensive disposal system in the County, this component presently accounts for about 51% of the total trash and recycling rate paid by a single-family household. 0 Franchise fee- Collected by Laidlaw in the billing process as a direct pass-through of costs and remitted to the City to offset public costs of maintaining streets, litter control and code enforcement, etc.; amount is a percentage of gross receipts. Municipal Code has provisions for franchise fee to increase by 1/2% each year until reaching a maximum of 10%. Actual practice since August 1993 has been to process rate increases as "revenue neutral" in order to avoid increased costs passed on to rate payers. As a result, franchise fee currently "frozen" at 8% has the actual effect of only paying an average of 6.33% on total gross receipts. 0 other costs- Laidlaw's cost of personnel, operating expenses, capital investments, etc. Per the Municipal Code, hauler is limited to one increase per year based on the most recent CPI adjustment for the immediate area. The last increase was granted in 1992 and City Council directed that recommendations for CPI increase in the "other costs" component be accompanied by additional information regarding company's return on investment, profit margin, etc. Curbside Recvclinq and Yard Waste Rate structure The residential curbside recycling program for single-family homes began Citywide in February 1991. Since that time, residential recycling programs for apartments and condominiums and yard waste collection have been added to the list of services provided to Chula vista residents. The first program set the basic rate structure 8' ,r ;2.. ..- ~._--- ------------- --------------- Page 3, Item ~ Meeting Date 6/27/95 which is currently followed for establishing the cost of all of the City's recycling programs. In general, the cost of these services starts with the operatinq cost (cost of collection), public education and franchise fee. For curbside recycling, that total cost is then reduced by the following components: 0 Revenues- Income from the sale of materials collected and delivered to the processor for secondary markets is applied 100% (less processing fees) to reduce the cost of service. 0 Landfill diversion credit- Credit is calculated at current landfill tip fees for tonnage collected in the program but diverted to secondary markets instead of being disposed. 0 Grants or other fundinq sources- In earlier years, Laidlaw has been the recipient of grant funds for start-up costs to reduce capital expenditures. Most recently, the company receives refunds from the state through the Beverage container Redemption Program which is an incentive program to encourage beverage container recycling. All grant funds, no matter the source, are applied 100% to reduce program costs. For yard waste recycling, where there are no revenues from material collected, the operatinq cost is primarily based on the curbside collection cost plus the costs to transport the material and have it accepted and processed at a nearby compost facility. Franchise fees are also included, however, the total cost is reduced by a landfill diversion credit which is applied to tonnage collected but diverted to compost instead of being disposed. In all recycling programs, rates are further adjusted at each review period based on estimates compared to actual performance of these components. These rate components may appear to be complex to understand and cumbersome to track, but the City's experience has been that they provide a mechanism to capture benefits from successful programs which reward users by reducing the cost of rendering the service. Examples of how the rate components work together to the public's advantage can be seen in the history of recycling program rates. since the inception of the curbside recycling program, the rate has gone from $1.10 to the current rate of 35 cents. Because of active public participation, strong market prices and high landfill costs, the single family curbside rate is now proposed at <$2.42> which means that it would offset the cost of trash collection and disposal by $2.42. Multi-family unit costs (for a program that is only a year old) are proposed to go from $1.50 to 92 cents. ~'-3 ---.-------- . - -.---- -.------- - - ----______nn___. --'---______n______- ----.------- Page 4, Item r- Meeting Date 6/27/95 The yard waste program has also been a significant success since the rate structure was changed in September 1994 to a universal program where the cost of the program is spread to all rate payers rather than paid by subscription. Tonnage collected has exceeded projections by 61%, allowing a recommendation that the rate decrease from $1.48 to 64 cents. A New Rate Component- AB939 Administrative Fee The opportunity to establish a new rate component to help cover the administrative costs of implementing AB939 was first discussed in the narrative for the FY 1995-96 Proposed Budget and in Supplemental Budget Report #13 dated 6/8/95. (See Attachment A.) When AB939 (The Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989) was enacted, affected jurisdictions were granted legal authority to recover these costs although Chula vista has not chosen to pursue such charges to date. However, the policy question of adding this rate component to the trash and recycling rate structures is timely because of the continuing General Fund program costs required by the mandate and the City's current financial situation. Based on current program costs, it would be justifiable to charge fees up to $142,000 for the full cost recovery of staff time involved in the city's recycling, composting and solid waste management programs. This amount would cover 100% of the Conservation Coordinator's time, and a portion of time for the two key positions actively involved in direct supervision and program management: a Deputy city Manager (10%) and Principal Management Assistant (50%). It was recommended that the Council approve the policy of charging for the recovery of some or all of these costs effective with this 7/1/95 rate change. For ease of payment, it was also suggested that the computation be set as a percentage of gross receipts similar to the monthly franchise fee payment which is remitted to the city by the hauler. An AB939 administrative fee as part of the total rate would also produce an equitable distribution of the fee because residential and commercial generators would be charged in relation to their service needs. As future recycling program needs develop, the option exists to adjust this revenue source commensurately. At the Special Meeting on 6/20/95 to discuss the Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget, the Council approved the policy issue of recovering these administrative costs through an AB939 fee as outlined in the Supplemental Budget Report. Recommendations Based on the above discussion, it is recommended that the rates included in Attachment B be approved effective 7/1/95. In summary, those rates include the following adjustments and their justifications: g-~( - -- ----~------ Page 5, Item r Meeting Date 6/27/95 1. Disposal Component 0 Remove temporary surcharge for higher disposal fees paid from 10/1/94 through 1/31/95 0 Reduce disposal component to reflect lower landfill fees effective 7/1/95 Discussion: All temporary surcharges which were imposed with the 3/1/95 billing will now be removed. For example, this will mean a decrease of $2.58/month for each single family household (SFH) and $10.99/month for a business with one dumpster picked up once/week. In addition, the disposal component of the entire rate for all customers will decrease 13.6% to reflect the County tip fee decrease from $55/ton to $47.50/ton on July 1st. This part of the disposal component will mean a further monthly decrease of $1.02 for SFHs and $4.33 for small business owners. 2. Franchise Fee Component 0 Increase franchise fee by 1/2 % Discussion: In August 1993, the city Council expressed concern about continuing to escalate the franchise fees each year, given the increasingly higher disposal costs that were also being passed on to rate payers. As a result of those concerns, each subsequent rate review hearing presented Council with a "revenue neutral" scenario which did not pass on any additional revenue to the city or any additional cost to the rate payer. Since franchise fees are calculated as a percentage of gross receipts, the result has been a gradual erosion of the effective franchise fee rate which is now averaging about 6.33% on a base rate of 8%. Based on the City's current financial situation and an analysis of franchise fee revenue over the past two years, staff recommended including a franchise fee increase of 1/2% in the FY 1995-96 Proposed Budget. At the time the budget document was prepared, the effect of the "revenue neutral" position on the franchise fee was that the City received $166,000 less than it would have if fees had been increased. That amount is now revised to $283,770 with results of three additional payments through April 1995. As noted in the Budget transmittal letter, this recommendation to increase 1/2% adds an estimated $76,000 in Laidlaw's franchise fee revenue which is projected in total to be about $770,000 in the coming year. 8'f Clf -- - - ------------- ---______m____--- Page 6, Item <6 Meeting Date 6/27/95 3. AB939 Administrative Fee Component 0 Add 1% AB939 administrative fee component rates for all generators Discussion: For reasons previously discussed, this rate recommendation includes a component for the administrative costs of planning, implementing and managing the recycling, composting and waste reduction programs. It is recommended to be calculated as 1% of gross receipts which is estimated to generate about $llO,OOO. The cost to SFHs should be about 15 cents/month and to small business owners about 76 cents/month. This additional General Fund revenue would significantly offset most of $142,000 in current General Fund program costs. 4. Recvclinq Proqram Components 0 Reduce curbside recycling rate to reflect public education monies to be covered by new AB939 administrative fee 0 Adjust all recycling program fees as appropriate to reflect pa~t performance and future estimated participation and market prJ.ces Discussion: other than program performance adjustments, the major change is in the public education component for the curbside program. As part of the original rate structure when the programs were first set, the unit cost for single and multi- family recycling included funds to cover public education needs. It is now recommended that the unit cost be reduced since all waste generators (including commercial customers) will need to receive public education material which is most appropriately funded through the funding mechanism for the programs, the AB939 fee. ~¿ - -------------------------------- Page 7, Item g Meeting Date 6/27/95 Conclusions with the changes as recommended above, the monthly impact on rates for commonly used services is illustrated below: Current Proposed Mo. Type of Service 6/30/95 ~ Chq. Residential (single fam.) $19.85* $12.49* <$7.36> Senior "Yellow Bag" Pgm. $12.00* $ 8.38* <$3.62> (Avg. 1 month cost) Commercial (Small business) $91. 35 $77.18 <$14.17> (One container/once wkly) . Includes charges for curbside recycling and yard waste. Alternatives to the Recommended Rates For Council's consideration, the following alternatives are presented even though they are not recommended. Attachment C is a matrix showing a comparison of the recommended and alternative rates in relation to their fiscal impacts on the rate payers and the General Fund. Option #1: Recommended Rates without 1/2% Franchise Fee Increase Option #2: Recommended Rates without 1% AB939 Administrative Fee option #3: Recommended Rates without Either 1/2% Franchise Fee Increase OR 1% AB939 Administrative Fee option #4: Recommended Rates With 2.5% CPI Increase on "Other Cost" Component CPI Adiustment to "Other Cost" Component (Option #4) As described previously, the Municipal Code allows for an increase in the "Other Cost" component of the rates, not to exceed the latest CPI for the local region. Laidlaw has not received a CPI adjustment since August 1992. At that time, the City Council required that staff bring forward additional information regarding profitability before another increase would be granted. Since that time, staff has worked with Laidlaw to find acceptable ways of gathering that information. To date, a preliminary study has been completed by an outside consultant under the direction of City staff and paid for by Laidlaw. 8"7 0-- --------------- -------- - ------------ - ----------- ----- ---- ----------- ---------- - Page 8, Item ( Meeting Date 6/27/95 The results of that study are expected to be presented to the City Council at the 8/1/95 meeting and a plan and timetable for further work will be described. In brief, the study results are inconclusive with respect to financial indicators such as expense ratio, return on assets, operating ratio, sales on assets and debt worth. staff has identified that an analysis of Laidlaw's operating costs would be the minimum amount of information necessary to draw meaningful conclusions from this preliminary work. Therefore, because of the previous Council's direction, staff is not recommending at this time the 2.5% cpr increase request brought forward by Laidlaw with the rate schedules requested for this public hearing. staff has notified Laidlaw that the City will work towards attempting to resolve the CPI issue by the end of the calendar year. Attached for council information, following Attachment C, is correspondence on the subject between the City and Laidlaw over the last few weeks. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the staff's recommended rates will cause no chanqe to the to the General Fund but will resul t in the implementing action to allow the city to collect an estimated $880,000 from a total of franchise fees ($770,000) and AB939 fees ($110,000). The fiscal impact of increasing franchise fees by 1/2% is estimated at $76,000 and was included in the original General Fund budget estimates presented in the FY 1995-96 Proposed Budget. Also, as a result of Council's action on 6/20/95 to approve the policy of charging an AB939 administrative fee, the $110,000 additional revenue anticipated is being included in the revised revenue estimates to be adopted with the budget at this city Council meeting. Even with this additional revenue to the City, as noted in the report, the overall impact on the rate payer is a substantial reduction. Fiscal Impact of Alternatives The impact upon the General Fund of choosing any of the four alternatives not recommended is detailed in Attachment c. In brief, the impact of choosing: option #1: To not approve franchise fee increase (but approve AB939 fee) . Decrease to GF of $76,000 option #2: To not approve AB939 fee (but approve franchise fee increase) . Decrease to GF of $110,000 option #3: To not approve either franchise fee increase or AB939 fee Decrease to GF of $186,000 Option #4: To approve both franchise fee increase and AB939 fee and 2.5% CPI increase. . Increase to GF of $1,540 8" g--- RESOLUTION NO. /77¥tl RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING RATE SCHEDULES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE, RESIDENTIAL AND YARD WASTE RECYCLING EFFECTIVE 7/1/95 WHEREAS, it is staff's conclusions and recommendations, that rates effective 7/1/95 include the following adjustments: . Remove temporary surcharge for higher disposal fees paid from 10/1/94 through 1/31/95. . Reduce disposal component to reflect lower landfill fees effective 7/1/95. . Increase franchise fee by 1/2%. . Reduce curbside recycling rate to reflect public education monies to be covered by new AB939 administrative fee. . Adjust all recycling program fees as appropriate to reflect past performance and future estimated participation and market prices. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the rate schedule for collection and disposal of refuse, residential and yard waste recycling effective 7/1/95 as set forth in Attachment B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. Presented by George Krempl, Deputy City city Manager c: \ rs\ trashrat.. inc 15' 1 j5 -¡Ò :;, Attachment A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET REPORT #~ DATE : June 8, 1995 TO : The Honorable Mayor and City Council VIA : John D. Goss, city Manage~ FROM : stephanie snyder, princiPa- -- Management Assistan~ SUBJECT : Additional Revenue option-- AB 939-related Administrative Fee During discussion of the proposed Administration budget for next fiscal year at the 5/31/95 workshop, Council was reminded of an additional revenue option which could be considered. As noted in the Budget transmittal letter (page xxiv) and the narrative for the Administration budget (page 100), the state granted legal authority to cities and counties to recover administrative costs for recycling and waste diversion plans and programs required under AB939, the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989. until this time, Chula vista has not chosen to pursue recovery of any General Fund costs necessitated by this state mandate. However, the City's current financial situation, as well as the knowledge gained by five years of experience in these programs, now raises this policy question for Council consideration. Backqround When AB939 was first enacted, it included authority for a jurisdiction to impose fees in amounts sufficient to pay the costs of preparing, adopting and implementing the required plans, as well as "in setting and collecting local fees." Between 1991 and 1992, six cities in the San Diego region added AB939 fees to their haulers' rates for residential and commercial trash service. These fees are in addition to recycling service costs, which represent the cost of picking up material and diverting it to secondary markets in order to keep it from being disposed at a landfill. The AB939 fees are also over and above the franchise fees retained by cities in their General Funds to maintain streets, enforce related litter abatement and Municipal Code requirements, etc. The local cities with current AB939 fees are Carlsbad, coronado, Escondido, La Mesa, Oceanside and vista. Both residential and commercial customers pay the fees in all six cities. Four of the six cities have determined specific flat charges by customer type and two charge a percentage of gross receipts, similar to the franchise fee calculation. The percents range from 1.1% to 3.5% 8"'1/ ¿.¡) SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET REPORT #----- Page 2 and flat charges range from 6 cents (residential) to $2.02 (commercial). The total amounts recovered range from $50,000 to over $150,000 annually. In all cases, the revenues are used to cover the total cost of staff, services and supplies directly needed for implementing recycling, composting and waste diversion programs as outlined in the cities' AB939 plans. In some cases, the revenues also partially cover the cost of staff with oversight and support responsibility for the AB939 programs, such as clerical assistance and supervision. The citv's Current Situation The City has one full-time permanent position specifically dedicated to the AB939 plan and programs, the Conservation Coordinator. In addition, both a Deputy City Manager (DCM) and a Principal Management Assistant (PMA) in Administration devote time to these programs and the related solid waste issues facing the City. Although some of the staff time is charged to non-General Fund sources, most of the costs are supported by the General Fund. Recommended Action It would be appropriate under the authority allowed in Public Resources Code Section 41901 to impose a fee to cover the cost of providing this service. Total cost for the Conservation Coordinator (at 100%), Principal Management Assistant (at 50%) and Deputy City Manager (at 10%) ranges from $87,440 for salary only to $141,800 for full cost recovery. If the policy decision is made to pursue this offsetting revenue, it is strongly recommended that the minimum amount should be the full cost recovery of the Conservation Coordinator's time at $76,650. It is also recommended that the form of fee be set as a percentage of Laidlaw's gross receipts for ease of calculation and payment. As an example of the impact on ratepayers, an AB939 administrative fee of 1/2% might be expected to cost a single-family homeowner about 7 cents/month based on current rates, and a business owner about 40 cents/month for one container picked up once/week. Although it is difficult to project precisely how much additional revenue a 1/2% fee would generate, it is estimated conservatively at $55,000 to $75,000 annually. As discussed in the budget narrative, actual implementation of this additional revenue would require approval through the trash and recycling rate review process. If Council approves the policy issue recommended in this report that the city may charge this fee, staff will provide rate options (with and without an AB939 fee) for consideration at an upcoming rate review hearing planned for the July 1995 billing. 'it> ) ,2 Staff Recommended Rate Schedules Attachment B ~I~~.~~~",: 10 C\ v It) I ¡;; ... ... ... "~N.. ~. N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I oj = :!Iö :I:!:!: Iö~ 10:: ~ i i ~: : I : i i ~ å 0 Z I . : . . . . : . . '"I :1-::: :1- :: ~- .... * * * .... U u ~: i !! ¡::: Iii¡ ::I : :: ,~~¡ ;¡ilii; I \1) ~I I I C - í ~! ;; f ~ ~ ,~ r-- (IJ ~I' ; . i ! 11 11 -(IJ W W '" ~ ó ¡ I.> ~ ~ 01' C - I ~~ I !!..¡ :5u..J 1!!¡!5'" ~ ,:>~< ~'I o~ ':I:u.-.. :I~ UW~ ~ ~~~ u.W!!:! '" czl- 1° if! - ~I' S r" I>«IJ U Q i!:: I-' ~ ~ 'IU ~ lEI 0 ,.. ,.. . ,.. . . ~ ~ ..lii ~ ~ ~ i i à 'I ~! ¡:; r¡ z.. .. z'."" '" 0.. 00 00.. I "~~!¡- ci ci j ci ci - .; I .. 0 III. ;; 15;;:: . :I: u Do ~ I!!I' : Iö :: C; I ~!¡ II :: il!!~1 ~ ~ .:J ¡::"!!'- r--v c '" ..!C ..,. s ...... ii' ~.I¡ ~ j , lø ; i ~ I ~ æ ¡ S!::.011 f g ~ ¡II i ~ i ~ e> ¡ > ~ I C § ! > ¡ ... ~ a:;111i I!I II ~ >1 Ii ~ ~ ¡ I ~ ~III-, m ! : ~ ~ ;1 ~ ~ IIII ~-.- w S w~ ~ w i!i!~ I§~ a ~E' ,i! i ~ ì ; i! ~ II i ! ~ i ~ ! i 8 ~J ~ I; ~--) J -----------.----- -----------..--.------- '-' - --...-.------ ','~ Ii ] Ii !~ Ii i~ Ii ¡~:Ii !~ 'i,P I ~ :i.~ i ¡i ¡I !i Ii ¡i Ii 11."rn ¡----r ~- I~ IH i i I~ ~ I~ i i Ii !i i~ ~ i li;~ Ii i Ii ii H i~ H "~ I~ ~ ~ ¡ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ i~ ! ~ !!~ ~ ~ ~ I~ !'~ § ~ !,~ I~ ~ I: : : : : : : N : : I: :!: : . . . . . . . .. .. ,- . ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . . w W IN iN 1- - !iiliiii22~~i~lGlIlI! i r; z " 0 ~UJJ.øu.n~. B~I.nn~~.n III ~ F ò111!!B:iI!!lIrIIIS; 1.¡;¡lrl!!rli:o:rl:: 1ft ... n .. 0 10 ill: :: li!!lluunJJ ~~~ ~ liI~81111rr81111188 ~ f; ... ,10 ::0 ¡ co I~ > 1 " Iml-i ~ m m .. ". 0 -i £? "10> -i ~1:C3-< nl:r-o ¡æ¡m m"T1 1/11::0 m mlO"T1 o! 1"'-"T1 ::t I:::ì~ m c "! or 1~::O::! > 10'> < < I,!~ m ¡¡¡ I!" len -. -i I~I .!. > ii I ì~¡ ~ :~ '" i i ¡¡ I~i ~ I :;1 f!\ I!:' , ' , I' i ,!!! ,~ ,;;I , Ii. ,: i = ,I I, ! .. .. .. ," .. ...1.. .. . " . i." 'ZI n ~ ¡~ I~~ Iii i¡¡~ .I¡~ !~~ ;;: ~:~ 1°; Ilii!!!!SS,r¡:B'B~'~ n ~l Q i ~I' ti!:!:!;;!;!!!!;.!! ;I!I!!!!!!!!!!:!.II!l1I1! §;!o ~ "I~,.",,~.~,,II'~ . I~.$IGII..OII'II'~~ !II .~8111~Ð\BI1811¡¡ ;!!~Ñ¡:::18!1¡!I~II~ ~I ~I "'I " ~ ~'Jrt ~ ]. r ' ------.- ,--.----- - ---- ----.-- ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ .. .. .. '" ... .. N .. .. "'1'" N ...,1 IU~: "!C!C!"!"!II!,,!":'I;C!"!ill!lI!"!, : ~;IU~ "';~:!::!!~fì¡~:g~:8!i13"'õ' lat Z;~I ¡¡¡Nlrl"'",:C>I!::~"'O"IO~OI., ~ c'" * 1-** 1- *;¡;;;;; ~ SI¡!!:::;8S'I/!i8li' ~ UUá$_..¡..~~S~ . .. ; 1:;1;1I1...1=II'iI~18' 8¡ill.IIIIII'IAlel !!~¡.iil¡i§l!il !~¡llii!a!¡!!1 ~~IIIJIJ=!1e2""1!1! ø ø ! ! I I¡II i i, II I i { IIII;SIIII=II.;(=I'.'" ~ ~ S S ~ ! ~ i ~ ø ~I S s .1 IU '" C IU Cu 1111¡¡lllIIlIIililIJIJAR IU ÊÊU!!!!lIIilllfq~U Q ..llllllaa.... '" ¡¡ ¡¡ ¡¡ ¡¡ , IU 1 IU 1 .. :;1118::8:;11111;111;111 ~ gø.UHiS~..!! Q ~ .. fT1J 1,1 I!I!::::IIIIIIIIII s,s I! I! SlSI¡I¡IIII."II.~!==,!,!, tJlj I ~-~~~~¡¡¡¡.... ~,~-,-,¡¡¡¡'""I,I ~i,~ -~"N""..~~..""", ~-"NI"'I"...~~..""" , I , '~! ~""""""""""""', ....¡.I......... ~ ,~~ š,šnnnni,iii' ššii'ili¡šššilšlšši CY--JS ~ ~ :~ 911 ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ! ~ !ilH ~ i HI t HI i ~ ~ i: i i ~ ii ¡') -~ I il,~iï~ï~lil~l~i~ï~ ,,~ï'~'ï5ï'~iil~iil~ïl~' /, =. , »¡»»'»»»» »>,»»»>,»», ' . - - - -- ---~~- --._-----~-.--- ---.---- 10 010 00 0 0 0 I' 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 '010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . ~ 1& 11& 1 & :,1 ti I !II& 1 it 1 ill &:1 i 11& II & 1 & 1 i P I ¡ :;; 10.10.0. .oc ' olc Clol.IOco. Co¡¡ Iii" '!1 ioioioio,i~.ii¡¡i¡ i.oiol¡oio¡o¡.¡ jiI~ Sa 55i555i5~i~I~§5!!i5 5l555515555§!~E~ " ~'~~~"'~~,'~ ~~.I~ "I~~~~I~.~~ ~ ~ ~ ì! ....'.1..-.1.1....!. ..1......................... ~ , "I. 'III I D- ¡:¡ ¡ ¡ 'i Ii ~:æ ii i i i ~ i; ¡:¡ i i i i i i i i i i ;; Ii i .. . . " UHU"JJ~~n p !~!.a;:8~.;:.1:11 ~ m ....... : ¡¡iijjllllii~~ ~ iilliil¡¡88~~lIlIiôiô :II m :D r; > III! U I n i i i ~ n m 0 nI 0' 1¡;¡¡.ISllltltI:81i1 ;:O~~ ~il: œ < nil: ,.. 01 !¡m m 'T' ~1:D mol ." £! :¡¡ J: I ::ili'! m c:: ~:D ~ > ;;1'>:.;: < ,llnlmëii !'cn"'¡~ :; 1>1 i j' : n, '" ! ;::1 III 1 I~ ';1 ' ~I I :II ! ~ ,m I': I~: n :I: ~ IIJJill~iii~!i ~ 1¡;¡¡.ISlltltI:811 ¡; : I ~ I , . ~ w .. ~~b w --------- ---------- ___un ----'------_____--n______---------- CITY OF CHULA VISTA RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE RECYCLING CONTRACT RATES FOR THE FIFTY THREE MONTHS ENDED: JUNE 30, 1995 1-"-2 YEAR 5 RATE EFFECTIVE 7-1-95 FIlE, CV!IEC705 3) PUBLIC EDUCATION DECREASE, FRANCHISE FEES RATE - 0.5'10 INCREASE. OPERATING COSTS - NO CHANGE : c:J D:J I RATE RATE RATE BASIS I COST COMPONENTS: I I OPERATINGCOSTS NOCHANGE ! PU8lIC EDUCATION ~ PUBLIC EDUCATION DECREASE FfìN'CHISE FEE $0.01 0,5% INCREASE TO COST COMPONE~ II $1.791 ' TOTAL RATE TOTAL RECYCLING RATE $1.881 RATE SOURCES: MATERIAL SALES ACTUAl 8 MOS AVG PROCEEDS (8/84-4/05) I..A/'VF1LL DIVERSION 0 MOS AVG TONS(O{04-5IO5) @$47,!!OrrON PFOGRAM GRANTS REMAINING PROGRAM GRANTS BASE UNIT RATE III $0.9211 I ($1.49~ I ($0.656)1 BASE UNIT RATE iRATE SHORTFALL I MATERIAL SALES RATE (OVERAGE) ADJUSTMENT I..A/'VF1LL DIVERSION RATE (OVERAGE) ADJUSTMENT i I CUSTOMER CHARGE RATE II $0.5011 II ($2.4211 YEAR 5 BlWNG RATE : SENIOR CITIZEN RATE II $0.3311 1\ ($1.58)1 35% SENIOR DISCOUNT ~,. /? ~-------- ----------, - -----_..,-------------- ----------------~~------------ ., CITY OF CHULA VISTA YARDWASTE RECYCLING CONTRACT ANNUAL COST EVALUATION FOR THE 10 MONTHS ENDED: JUNE 30,1995 .....""""'" ,YEAR 2 RATE EFFECTIVE 7-1-95 I-tO-" I 15 PROGRAM RESULTS ADJUSTMENTS. FRANCHISE FEES RATE - 0.5% INCREASE. OPERATING COSTS - NO CHANGE. AB 939 FEE - 1% [¡!]EAR [Z]EAR I~12 I . RATE RATE I RATE BASIS I COST COMPONENTS: OPERATING COSTS $2.03 $2.030 PROCESSING COSTS $0.56 $0.879 10IAOSAVGTONS@II2UO(l'ONPROCESSING ¡FRANCHISE FEE $0.12 $0.123 0,""" FRANCHISE FEE INCREASE , AB939 FEE $0.00 $0.006 1'U8838 FEE ,TOTAL YARDWASTE RATE I $2.71: I $0.000: $0.329. $3.0391 TOTALRATE BASE RATE SOURCE: : LANDFILL DIVERSION I ($1.230) ($0.428\ I ($1.658~ 10 lAOS AVGTONS@S47,50II'ONDIVERSION i BASE UNIT RATE II $1.480 t I $0.000 I ($0.099~ I $1.3811 BASE UNIT RATE RATE SHORTFALL I OVERAGES): LANDFILL DIVERSION ($0. 739~ RATE (OVERAGE) ADJUSTMENT !CUSTOMER CHARGE RATE II $1.480! II $0.64211 YEAR2BIWNGRATE ?, / f" ------------ -- ..,----------",,- ,---- ",,--------,-------------- ,--- --,--------------,--------,---------------- CITY OF CHULA VISTA MULTIFAMILY RECYCLING CONTRACT RATES FOR THE NINETEEN MONTHS ENDED: JUNE 30. 1995 0-'0.0' YEAR 2 RATE EFFECTIVE 7-1-95 I : 'ILEe'""" 5) PROGRAM RESULTS ADJUSlMENTS. FRANCHISE FEE RA-æ - 0.5% INCREASE. oPERATING COSTS - PROGRAM REVIEW. - FEE - 1 % c:J : R;TE RATE BASIS I ~COSTC()MPONENTS: OPERATING COSTS $1.78 ($0.100 I $1.680 1st YEAR PROGRAM REVIEW r PUBLIC EDUCATION $0.10 $0.090 I $0.010 EOUCATION REOUCTION FRANCHISE FEE $0.12 $0.005 I $0.125 0,5% INCREASE TO CUSTOMER CHARGE RATE AB939 FEE $0.00 $0.009 I $0.009 1%AB039FEE I ¡TOTAL RECYCLING RATE II $2.001 I $0.000 I ($0.176)1 I $1.8241 TOTAL RATE BASE..RATEiSOURCE: I MATERIAL SALES ~ ~ 12 MOS AVG PROCEEDS (5/94-4/95) e- LANDFILL DIVERSION $0.300 $0.065 12 MOS AVGTONS (5/94-5/95) @$47.50ITON ¡BASE UN-IT RATE II $1.500 I ($0.133)! 1$1.191! BASE UNIT RATE ~ATE SHORTFALL! MATERIAL SALES RATE (OVERAGE) ADJUSTMENT , LANOFILL DIVERSION RATE (OVERAGE) ADJUSTMENT I CUSTOMER CHARGE RATE 11$1.500l I~ YEAR 2 BILLING RATE - ------- -- %;)1 -------------------- - ----------------------,--------,--- ,------------, Attachment C Comparison of Recommended Rates to Alternatives Estimated Description Monthly Rate Payer Impacts General Fund Residential* Commercial** (Budgeted) Impacts RECOMMENDATION: 0 Disposal reductions 0 1/2% franchise fee increase $12.49 $77.18 -0- 0 1% AB939 fee 0 recycling adjustments OPTION #1: NO franchise fee increase 0 Disposal reductions $12.41 $76.80 <$76,000> 0 1% AB939 fee 0 recycling adjustments OPTION #2: NO AB939 fee 0 Disposal reductions 0 1/2% franchise fee increase $12.34 $76.42 <$110,000> 0 Recycling adjustments OPTION #3: NO AB939 fee AND NO franchise fee increase $12.26 $76.04 <$186,000> 0 Disposal reductions 0 Recycling adjustments OPTION #4: CPI increase on "other cost" component $12.75 $78.28 +$1.540 0 Disposal reductions 0 1/2% franchise fee increase 0 1% AB939 fee 0 Recycling adjustments 0 2.5% CPI increase *Single family household rate including recycling and yard waste collection. **One 3-yard container picked up once/week. ~.,2.0 - ------------------_on_--, - - ------------ ØØ"8J1ØØ LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS June 21, 1995 LWS-I061 George Krempl, Deputy City Manager City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 George, As a follow-up to your letter ofJune 9th and my conversation with Stephanie ofJune 16th, I want to confirm my request to go forward to the City Council with the cpr adjustment in the rate presentation package. I appreciate your acknowledgment of the frustration we have experienced in recent years in securing a cpr adjustment for the operational components of the rate. At the same time, I am surprised to see your reference of the 45 day back-up advance referred to in paragraph 2. Our direction has been to submit our requests at the same time as other rate adjustments to eliminate multiple rate changes to the customer billing over a short time frame. Specifically, the Council has recommended that cpr requests come at the same time landfill rate adjustments. Since our last cpr approval in July of 1992, we have worked with a variety of City Staff members to answers questions and support next steps in the review process. We have maintained separate financials for your operations, suggested financial indicators to be used in a review process, submitted financial indicator information, paid for an independent review of financial data and indicators submitted by Laidlaw, and paid for financial consulting services to the City by their chosen consultant. Just as the City has experienced wry real operational cost increases since July of J 992, so has Laidlaw. Accordingly, we find it critical to present our cpr request to Council at this time with the understanding that the City will continue their study. Your support is appreciated. Sincerely, , cc: Dan Higgins ¿r "c2 , P.o. BOX 967 . Chula Vista, California 91912 . (619) 421-9400 . FAX (619) 421-0841 Recycled Paper 'i J ------ ~~lt- -.- ~~~ cm OF CHUA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER June 9, 1995 Jim Weaver, Market General Manager Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. 881 Energy Way Chula Vista, CA 91912 Dear Mr. Weaver: Thank you for your reply to my May 25,1995 letter concerning rate adjustments and other informational requests we made. We appreciate receiving the various rate schedule scenarios. At this point we are not sure when the rate adjustments might be considered by Council. The choices are June 27 or July 11. The June 27 date will require direction from Council as they normally take off the two weeks following adoption of the budget (June 20). Due to public hearing advertising requirements, consideration prior to June 27 is not possible. We will advise you further as soon as we have more information. with regard to your C.P.I. adjustment request, we must respectfully decline although we fully appreciate the frustration that has occurred. Staff does not feel it has sufficient information nor sufficient time to analyze information that you may submit to make a positive recommendation to take effect July 1. We also believe the requirement to furnish us a rate increase request and backup 45 days in advance of any effective proposal date is an important one. Should you wish a C.P.I. request to go forward to Council without staff support, please advise us. We did proceed with the Hilton, Farnkopf and Hobson financial indicator study with g?od intentions and in the hopes it would simplify the rate revJ.ew process for CPI increases. We also appreciate your funding of the study. The product does provide valuable information but unfortunately falls considerably short of my expectations as to how this data might be used. One problem is the lack of any comparative indicator information except on a national level, which is not terribly helpful. Even more critical is the fact that for each indicator there are two possible scenarios, either ineffective management of operating expenses or rates that are too low. without being able to conclude that a "negative" indicator is not based on operating expenses being at fault, we are really no better off in measuring a C. P. I. rate ~ " .,,2.;2.. 276 FOURTH AVENUE' CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910 . (619) 691-5031 . FAX (619) 585-5612 * ""'.....-... increase. We anticipate a report to Council on the indicators late in July, probably the 25th. Both the Finance Director and our office believe that a rate analysis of operations is in order. This, coupled with the indicators and a comparison survey of our rates with other jurisdictions, should provide a more complete picture. We would be happy to discuss this further. Sincerely, Æ:.'hL-/ Deputy City Manager GK:mab cc: John Goss, City Manager Bob Powell, Finance Director [5' e23 CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) øoøseøø LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS INC. June 6, 1995 LWS-1057 George Krempl, Deputy City Manager City ofChula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: Rate Review Public Hearing June 20, 1995 George, In preparing for the Public Hearing and in response to your May 25th letter, we have discussed the following response schedule with Stephanie Snyder to provide the requested infonnation to the City- " Refuse Fee Issues The infonnation is being provided for both residential and commercial waste services, Rate schedules reflecting the requested changes are attached- In addition we have submitted schedules reflecting a c.P_I. to be provided to Laidlaw under each of your requested scenarios as well. Schedules submitted include four residential and four commercial reflecting the following, 1. . Landfill decrease from $55/ton to $47.50/ton effective 7/1/95- 136% base rate decrease of Landfill Component and elimination of the temporary surcharge, . Franchise Fee Rate - No Change- . Other Rate Fee - No Change, 2. . Landfill decrease from $55/ton to $47.50/ton effective 7/1/95- 13_6% base rate decrease of Landfill Component and elimination of the temporary surcharge- . Franchise Fee Rate - No Change, . Other Rate Fee - 2.5% C.P-I. increase (San Diego CPlU for All Urban Consumers as of 12/31/94), 3. . Landfill decrease from $55/ton to $47.50/ton effective 7/1/95. 13,6% base rate decrease of Landfill Component and elimination of the temporary surcharge, . Franchise Fee Rate - 0_5% increase of the new Landfill and Other Rate Components along with 0.5% increase of current Franchise Fee Rate Component. . Other Rate Fee - No Change- ~" ..2 f 8364 CLAIREMONT MESA BLVD.. SAN OIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 (619) 278-6061 FAX (619) 278-7528 @ 4- . Landfill decrease from $55/ton to $47,50/ton effective 7/1/95- 13.6% base rate decrease of Landfill Component and elimination of the temporary surcharge, . Franchise Fee Rate - 0.5% increase of the new Landfill and Other Rate Components along with 0,5% increase of current Franchise Fee Rate Component. . Other Rate Fee - 2.5% C.P.!. increase (San Diego CPIU for All Urban Consumers as of 12/31/94), We have included separate schedules for a requested and earned cp,!. adjustment for Laidlaw, We ask that you reconsider your position to support this request. As you know. Laidlaw has gone without any adjustment to their portion of the rate component since July 1, 1992- We have worked closely with the City in providing the financial information and indicators reqeusted and, most recently, paid at the City's request for the consultation exercise performed by Hilton, Frankopf. and Hobson. As you recall last fall. we also provided certain financial indicators that were reviewed by our independent auditor. Coopers & Lybrand LLP- In addition, we have maintained separate financials for the City of Chula Vista service operations, We will provide information by June 9, 1995 reflecting the changes in operational cost to further support this request. We will fully support a rate analysis by the City's 'in-house staff" in the future but respectfully ask that we receive your support of our request for the 2,5% CP.!. adjustment in the interim period, Curbside Recyclinl! and Yardwaste These schedules are being prepared and will be forwarded immediately upon their completion for your review- All schedules for curbside single family homes, multi-family residential, and single family home yardwaste will be completed by Friday, June 9th, As discussed with Stephanie, a mixed paper collection component for the single family home is being completed and analyzed. We are researching an alternative approach to fund this addition at the City's request. We should have preliminary data to discuss at the end of the week. We are also considering acc collection to further support diversion efforts, I believe this addresses the request in your letter and our conversations with City Staff- We look forward to meeting with you soon- ð" '" ,23 r' , ( ~(~ G~ --.- .~~~~ CIlY OF CHUlA VISfA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER May 25, 1995 Mr. Jim Weaver, Market General Manager Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. 881 Energy Way Chula Vista, CA 91912 Dear Jim: Re: Preparation for Rate Review Public Hearing - June 20, 1995 There are a number of rate components that need to be addressed in Laidlaw's July billing and we are planning on scheduling a public hearing for Tuesday, 6/20/95 so that we can minimize the chance that the billing will have to be delayed. Following is our list of components and the action we would like you to take in proposed rate schedules. At this time, the schedules should be calculated to run from 7/1/95 through 6/30/96. Curbside Recvclinq and Yard Waste Please submit proposed curbside rates for both single-family (SFH) and multi-family (MFH) residential and SFH yard waste, including at least the following elements: 0 SFH curbside and yard waste rates now spread over 12 months instead of 8 0 Eliminate the SFH public education component (10 cents/household) which you now rebate to the City 0 MFH curbside evaluated with landfill diversion credit and passing on operational savings from major changes to the original pro forma, i.e. number of vehicles needed for program, public education efforts, etc. 0 Since the markets are so strong, we have been looking forward to your plan to add mixed waste paper collection to the curbside program as soon as possible and this should have a positive impact on the recycling rate, or be "rate neutral" at the least. Refuse Fee Issues Calculate the trash fee based on: 0 Elimination of the temporary increase collected from March through June for the tip fee surcharge last year lrr,2.~ 276 FOURTH AVENUE. CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910 . (619) 691-5031 . FAX (619) 585-5612 @-_.... '/1 Mr. Jim Weaver May 25, 1995 Page 2 0 Tip fee to go from $55/ton to $47.50/ton effective 7/1/95, a 13.6% decrease from the existing base rate of the landfill component, not including the temporary surcharge 0 ~ calculations of franchise fees-- one showing a "revenue neutral" no change as we have done over the past year and a half, and a second showing a pass-through of a 1/2% increase in the franchise fee, bringing it up to a base of 8-1/2% CPI and other Issues On the remaining ("other") refuse rate component, we do not feel we can recommend a CPI increase at this time even though we have recently gone through the Hilton, Farnkopf and Hobson (HFH) exercise to establish financial indicators requested by the Council over two years ago. At the 4/25/95 meeting with city staff, Dan Higgins and Bob Hilton, we all acknowledged that the final product of the exercise is inconclusive without further analysis of Laidlaw's operational costs and revenues or a complete solid waste rate study. Our Finance Director has indicated that his office would be able to undertake a rate analysis after the beginning of the new fiscal year. Doing the work" in-house" has a number of advantages for both the city and Laidlaw. The city retains the prerogative to determine subsequently that outside assistance is still needed in order to apply the information and draw conclusions about Laidlaw's rates within the industry. We understand that discussions about a possible CPI increase have gone on for a long time but we feel positive about the progress made towards a defensible, understandable rate increase. Although we are attempting to achieve some rate stability by limiting the number of changes to once a year, we will work with you towards attempting to resolve the CPI issues by the end of the calendar year as you have requested. You have also promised Michael a proposal to implement unit-based pricing effective January 1996, so we agree that it may be reasonable or advantageous to the ratepayers to bring forward another rate change prior to July 1996. 8""";¿ 7 /D ---------- Mr. Jim Weaver May 25, 1995 Page 3 To keep on schedule for preparation of our report to Council, we need to have your rate schedules and back-up documentation no later than Monday, 6/5/95. Feel free to call me once you and Dan have had a chance to go over the items needed and we can meet to discuss specific steps to take to address the cpr issue. It would also be our intent to report to council on the results of the HFH indicator analysis at the same meeting on 6/20/95. lelY, ~.V Deputy City Manager cc: Bob Powell Stephanie Snyder Michael Meacham lJ' .2 'if ~ - 32-.. rl PUBUC HEARING CHECK UST PUBUC HEARING DATE: (,b.7/o, S . . 'UWECT, ~ ~ ~ -== ~ ..00.4-., ~ p-o-P LOCATION: :'.....' ð,.,..; ........ i:1.. SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBUCATION -- BY FAX /' ; BY HAND ; BY MAIL PUBUCATION DATE <'/1"+ /q:s - - MAILED NOTICES TO PROPER1Y OWNERS - NO. MAILED PER GC §54992 Legislative Staff, Construction IndustIy Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122 LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK tø/t:t IQ~ COPIES TO: Administration (4) / Planning ,/"' Originating Depaltment Engineering ¿ Others City Clerk's Office (2) /' POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS 1,!4.!tfS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 7/93 .55- g~-i( NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public hearing to consider the following: The purpose of considering rate decrease for collection & disposal of refuse, recyclables & residential yard waste. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: June 9,1995 ?5";JéJ PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is forthe County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 CoC.Po) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Diego: cv 06232 Proof of Publication of: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of t~e County aforesaid; I am over PUBL I C HEAR I NG the age of eighteen years, and not a party ------------------- to or interested in the above-entitled matter; I am the principal clerk of the printer of the STAR-NEWS, CHULA VISTA, a newspi3-per of general circulation, published TWICE-WEEKLY in the City of Chula Vista, and the South Bay Judicial District, County of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of April 23, 1951, Case Number 164327; that the notice, of which the annexed is' a printed copy ( set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 6/14 ali in the year 1995 I certify ( or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at CHULA VISTA California, this ~ day of ~ ,1995 Signatur~I!.G.-~ grJ"l PRINCIPAL CLERK é COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item '1/J Meeting Dat;- g/ø1;;h~ ITEM TITLE: Amendment to the City's Public Employees Retirement (PERS) Contract to Provide 2% at 55 Full Fonnula for Local Miscellaneous Members ~b~A. Resolution /79/7 of Intention to Approve an Amendment to Contract Between the Board of Administration of the Public Employees Retirement System and the City Council of the City of Chula Vista B. Urgency Ordinance ,2(,3'< of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract Between the City of Chula Vista and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees Retirement System SUBMI'ITED BY: John D. Goss, City Manager 4 (4/Stbs Vote: Yes X No ~ After negotiating with represented miscellaneous employees of the City of Chula Vista (Chula Vista Employees Association [CVEA] and Western Council of Engineers [WCED. agreement was reached on a four-year contract which reflects the negotiation guidelines of the City Council. that includes the 2 % at 55 retirement modification, under PERS Section 21251. 132 (a mandatory work furlough. two stipends. and a wage increase fonnula in the founh year). Amending the PERS contract will provide a modified retirement benefit in accordance with the agreement. This amendment is contingent upon the ratification of the applicable Memorandums of Understanding with the affected bargaining units. RECOMMENDATION: That the Council adopt the Resolution declaring the City's intent to approve an amendment to the PERS contract in order to provide the 2 % at 55 retirement benefit to the local miscellaneous members. and place the Ordinance on first reading. authorizing the Amendment. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A DISCUSSION: The proposed 2 % at 55 provisions will modify the retirement fonnula, enabling employees to retire earlier than under the current 2% at 60 contract provision. The Ordinance is requested to be placed on the agenda as an urgency measure in order to facilitate continued labor hannony and the uninterrupted smooth flow of City govenunent services. If the amendment does not go into effect July I, 1995, the efficient provision of City services could be affected. FISCAL IMPACT: Pursuant to the PERS actuarial valuation, the cost of 2 % at 55 for local miscellaneous members. is 2.891 % of applicable salary costs for that group. The increased rate is effective July I. 1996 and due to the offsetting furlough savings through the tenn of the Memorandum of Understandings. there will be no cost associated with this benefit. (CVEA . ""'.A,"3) 9/1 -/j?J9-:< _i ORDINANCE NO.J "'~~ AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM The City Council of the City of Chula vista does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Chula vista and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit, and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full. SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption not sooner than twenty (20) days after its introduction as an urgency measure for the following reasons: Labor discontent that will prevent the proper and efficient operation of the City government and provision of public services if the proposed amendment does not go into effect July 1, 1995. Prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days from the passage thereof, the City Clerk shall publish this ordinance in the Chula vista Star News, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Chula vista. Presented by (l'. t Orueo ", £. John D. Goss, City Manager Attorney C:\or\2'I'SS 9~ -.J ! "j¡)-"l ,I PERS CONT SERV DIV TEL:916-326-3005 Apr 26'95 10:47 No.002 P.O4/10 EXHIBIT AJoIIINDMENT TO 00N'1'2ACT --I'WAUI 'DIE BOA:RD OP ADMINI8TL\'I'ION or 'l'BE ftJIILIC DII'LOYI'.IS" JIIt1'IIIIIMEIQ IYS1IM AND TBB an COtJNCIL or 'l'BE an .. CIIVI.Á 'VISI'A The JIoaId of II I . ,hoot!.. Pub&~' a.m.-t s,-. b-~ IIII6:In4 to . Bo8rd, l1li1 die aovcadDI body of above pubIk: f8IŒ)' . --- nd'med to . PIIbIIc At/,rtt1t:1. IlaYÚIIIIIIIII'Id. Do . c:omract dfcafve Ocaokt I, 1M8. l1li1 wiIDeI8! Aupst 31, 194&, l1li1 . ...sed ell"ective Oetober I, 19$1, NOYaDbcr I, 1955, lilliiii)' I, 1960,1liliiii)' 1, 1961, S8K8aIber I, 1961. SIpcImber 28. 1973. 0ttDbcr 4, 1973, Ocaokt 8. 1976. April 16, 1981. J..,. 8, 1982, SIpc8Dber 28. 1984. July 3. 1987. 0c:IDba' 13. 1989. ScpIaDbcr 7:1, 1990. Novcmber 16. 1990, JIIIuary 4. 1"1. ScpIcmbcc 6. 1"1l1li1 0cIdIIr 7, 19M wIdch pIOVidIa tbr ~... of PIIbIü: ~ III aid SJIIrm, Baud aDd P\JbIie A8fIlC1 baeby ape . follows: A. P8ra¡rapbs 1 IbrouJb 14 IR hereby 8IIidœz1 fIœ1 aid COIIU8CI . 8UCIdId eII"ectiYe 0cÞIbcr 7, 19M, aad hI:Rby ap.:aI by !be: tbIIowq pIIIpIpJIa IIIIåcn:d 1 datqb 14 IzdIsIye; I. All words l1li1- .. bereiD wbIc:h IR deCIDed iD !be: P\Ib1Ic Bmp~' R8cinmIø Law Ih8D baYe .. -ma . dc:t'iIIcd dIcrciD ua1C1S cdIerwI8e IpCdfIcaIly provided. "NonD&1 ~ .- IbaI1 DaD . 55 b 1oca1"-""-18IIben l1li1. SO for local 88frsy D8Dbe1s. 2. PllbIk ".-:1 Ü8I1 ~ ID tœ ÞahIie e...y..,...' Lt, . S7*m ÍIOID 8D4 lifter 0c:tDbct I, 1948 DIIIåII& IIa ~ u 1IIIà..... pIO\'ÍIIIC1, IDIIIIIIca of aid SJStIm 1Ubja;t tD an proYiskD of !be: Pubüc 1!mpI0ye8' ..... lAw 8CeF' I1ICh . çp1y oaly lID eIaIaD at . CDIIraaIIIc IIpœy aDd 81: lICIt pIOVkIed for beIåD aDd to aI1 ØBIdmenIs tD aid Law bereafttr CIIII;Ud .. dIaIe, wJIid1 by ..... pzuYÏÅIIIIS Ib8reof, ..,py cdy C8I .. eIIaÎIID of . ~...m.IpIII:)'. 3. EqIIoyIa of PIIb1iç ~ III dI8 followlDa dI8cI II8Il bcçome IIIIIJIbeø or aid RedremaIt s,am acIp I1ICh iii eK:h IUd! class . lie acIuded by law or Ibis .-z: .. Local fIø FJPIm o-m nImed to . b:a1 8â:ty 1IICIIIben); b. Local Police 0!IiøaI (bInåu ndinad tD . local 8f¡¡¡q -*n); Co Bmpk:/yIIG GIla" dIaD b:a1 ufeq IIICIIIbcø (bInID IIII'8:nd lei . Ioca1 .....11- ---). '- , 9/Î~ PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBiT ONLY. 4. III 8ddidoD to die ... of employ88 GdudecI ftœ2 ......01. .d I~ by Aid It8tir8œøt , -. fIe fullowint d- of cmpIoycm 8ball aor become IIXIIIbcn oIlÚd Rt:dreøImJI SyIrem; NO.ADDrI1ONAL D'.CI~ISIONS 5. Prior CD IIIIIIIIY I, 1975, dIOIc ....... wbo -- Idn4 by Pablic ApDt:y OD a ~ 8l1li« ..-l ... .. to cacccd (; 8CIIIIIIt - C8Wc4 fr<Im Pæ9 --.Jdp by aanct. eä.-.......t Code Sec:daa 20336 sapeøedcs 1l1li CICIIII8Ct povI8IoI1 by pœvidID& ... my Ada I8aIpOlUY ..voc ~ ~ ... -mew ftœ2 PERS - II,':&: ....... lID JØ8y I, 1975. LcIi""'" rcpcI1cd IDI1 npJ-s IIkI SccdaD wbh ~ Code Sec:dœ 2œS4 ðedve Jab' 1. 1994. 6. Pdør eo ,~ 1. 1975. ..... --- wbo - bINd by PIIbIic Apt/I:1 OD a -.pnry ..vor ~ -- DOC eo --S 6 ...... -- GducIed ftœ2 PBBS ødIenbIp by COIåICL Cår.---4 Code Sec:daa 20334 sapeøedcs 1l1li CICJIIIDCt pruviIÌIID by prvridiaa -lIlY I11C11I8II!pOnIY 8JJJIac ...... emp1o,e8 ... adaded fnIm PERS ~ -",",?-ID bmI8Iy 1. 1975. 7. TbiI c:œIrIIi:t IbID be a, ......~,&tLmofdle 00IItI8C:C ofdle Moata 7 Pin PraIIcI:ioD Diárict. ~ rdcmd eo - "FoaDer Apø;y". '!be __.1..... -..ww..., 8IISS III! IIabflty for prtar III! cmn\III servtœ 1IIIdIr die I'orIœr A¡rø::y'8 caatr8Cl8ball be -sed panœsat CD Scc:IiOD 20567.1 of die ~ Code. SIIc:h -.- oc:mmIC! JIzIwy I, 1986. a. AIl badD ¡mMded IIIIder dd8 COIIIDI:t 8baII1IpI,. eo III pIIt ISYIœ for foma IIIIpIøJes of die tofoIa8oIDeI1 FIre Proœc:dœ DiIak:t. I. Tb8 I8rI8âp of fIIII1 «IIIp ,~ ID be pœrided Ibr tId1 YIIr of cn&e4 pIiør IDI1 camar 8CrYice . a Ioc81 mfJ-I1-111C:1J11a IbIII be cIdIo....w4 ill ~ wIIh :oIIaim ?1~1 1'J7. oflldll RaimDcrI Law (2" . 811'" PuD). 9. 1k pcnaI8&e of fiII&1 c IIIIIp -'zlID be ~ for aICh year of cn4ÞcI pelot till! c:umm 8C¥II:8 . a Ioc:I1 ...,,-- -- IlIaD be danDiœd Ia -"- wtIh ScaIaa 11251.01 of aid R8dnID8It Law (2" .811'50 PuII). 9. Pab1ic A&G?J cIDCIIC4 ID be 8Ubject eo dI8 IaI1owia8 apIÎIIaII pmriIiaaI: L S8cdœ 2OIQ.I (OIdII1z UIIa8d SiI:t Lave). b, S8cdœ 20020 rLoc:8l foIice omø:r" åIl bIDCIe ...- 8MipecI CD IdeUII\c8IOD ad -~ åIiat iD die Påiœ DcpuIIIIcat wbo -- !lilt d85i&d. Ioc:aI 8ds1.-abm ad wIIo _1I1111C11 ~ OD oc prior eo A11p114. 1m, 8Dd 1Ibo eIecad eo be Iøc:a1 8&!ety ....... OD f1l before ...... 28, 1m). 911 ' t PER$ CO NT $ERV DIV l~L:~lQ-~¿Q-~UU~ HI' r "'" "'" ¿V'Q~ ~D.VV'" r.VD'.V PLEASE DO NOT SIGN .EXHIBIT ONLY" 0.. 88CIioD 21222.15 (SpeoIa1 3 l' . 15 l' --) h ... - w.Jf of dIO8e Ioc81 ~1_1D8IIba IIId ... 1aca18detr...... wbø nånd or dXd prior to Jaauy 1. 1".4. d. .... 2126S - 2126U (PaIt-lt8âr8l8at Sarmw ADøwm:e) for Ioc81 .., --- CIIIIy. e. Sec:daa. 20500 (NJIic A.-:y l1li111 ...".. !aft IpI8IID IIIIre die CXIII. of die foIIowIII8 b88IIt): .... 21252.01- 21' . .. ~ PIIII faaIIaJa. PnlDIIIII .... ...... 28. 1984 ID JÞJf 1. 1985 die IIIet1 CIIIpIø,ecs of PIIb1ic Â&fIIlI:1811111 be -- m8dditiGaal 0.341 l' of IIIIIr 'aIIII ,I.... for . tIOIIl CXIIIIribaII8... of 9.341 l' ..-- to 0..... --4 Code SecIiOII 20500. f. Sa:doa 21!IU (I'Idrd lAMI ~ 1m SanhŒ 1IIaIðII) JIII8IIDr ID .ArIIde 6 (1---1.. willi SecdoG 21380). I. 8ecIioa 2DOZ4.2 (OaI-Y- FiaI1 CUI( ""'1). h. Sccdoa 2QOæ.l ("Loc:d Police 0IIIcer° IIIaIIIDduIfe IIIJ amœr or IIIIIpicJyee of a paIice dtpnmaIIeqlloyed ID perfomI ~ dudes 8Dd no eIec:Ied 10 '*- a1ocl118f8ty -- .. ÃIIpIt 25. 1m). i. Scd:iœ &30.3 (MiIäry Scrrir;e CødIr . PIIII& ScYir;:e). SIIIIØI8 of 1976. ,. SecIiOII2Im4.2 (tJDe-Yec FIDI1 CJJII( 10 0). 10. PubJ1ç Aaea:1. Ia --- with 0.......-1 Code Scctioa 20740. œuc:d 10 be aD °Clllp~o for parpoICI or Scçdœ 'JI1159 eðiIc::dve em 0aDbar 8. 1".6. ~-hr'" ~øfPubllc Aptaq IIIaIl be tIJœd 111114d~ I""'. proYided iD ao......-£ Code SecIioa 'JI1159. - _.1"'" COIIIr;.-- tbIndIIr lid be WcJ by die loud . ¡mMd8c1 ÎD 0..._- Code S8cdoG 'JI1159. 11. PubIk: A¡a¥:y II1JIl1 CIIIIIIZIIIIIIe 10 IIId ltaIrIaJø SyIJIm die .....ø1b.Ä.uo ~..m..4 by acawkt nIu8Iiuua uC pr- aø1 IWn ...... Ii8biJity with I8pIICt ID Ioc81 "',""""'" ~ IllllIoc81I8f8ty --- of Aid ~ SyItan. 12. PubIk: It.p:ø;J III8Il aI8o CII1IIIrII:IUIIID IIid .~ SJI8aD . toJlowI; L PIIb1Ic /oJCfII:Y 8b8II. 00IIIdIIaII $2.00 ,.. ~ perlllOlllh OG -- ofilia IIabIIIIy Ii&' die 1959 ~ B..&a pmvid8d. UIIder 5ecaoII 213t1Z.4 alllld ....... Law. (SaIIjact ID ~ cIIIap.) In IIIIdiIiœ. .n .... - IIIbDilbofl'ublk AJ8DÞ181111 iIa~ IIbI1I be puulalia aatøp8IDIIII. IIIIed œ - bmm:e ala. far amoø of ID 1ocI1 ~- IIIIIIIbcn 8Dd Ioc81 ...., ---. 9.4'7 ,:.,.> ~,"" "~,,...., -- .... ...- ..-- b. Ã II8OIIIbJe IIIIØIIIIt, IS fImI by !be BoIId. pQIbIe 111 ODe Iall8J1- 1rithin 60 days of cIaI8 of 0IIIIàII:t 10 CtMIt tile CO8tI of IdmIIIIIœriDa uid SJII!ID . II 8II'ecII die ~ of Pablic Apø:y. IIØt bIducIiII8 die COlla øl special --- cz of.. periodic IIIvc8dpIIoD 8Dd V8IaIdcIœ I8IpIired by law. c:. It. RISODIb1e 1IIIiJID. . Øød by die load. pII1IbIc 111 ODe ~ as the 0CC8Iiœ8 arise, 10 CtMIt die CO8tI of speclllVIIDItIøDs 0I111CC111U111 of empIø)'ee$ of Public ApIII:y. 8Dd CIOIÞ at die p8iodic iImItIpdœ 8Dd ¥8bIIdcø ~ bylø. 13. C9r'hJdœ8 œcped ofP\Jblk: Af'IlC/IIId lis IIIIpIøJe8 8bI11 be IUIIject 10 IIf.uIID8III by IIa8rd em -- at I ........ 10 tb8 PIdI& 1IaIp~' Jio:cå...eat Law, IIId 011 ~ cI die apcrIIar:c 1IIIIIer die ~ s,.- 15 .......œ-s by tb8 p8riøcIic IøvcIdpdoo IIId wIuIiøa nqaInd by AId RIdnaIaI& ~. 14. CœIIibuIkIIII øqaInd of MIle Apt1q 8Dd III ~ 8l1li1 be pIId by PublIc A¡fø:;y 10 die ~ s,.r.n w\IIrin ftfI881 .1ft8r IN IIId or die (ICria4 IØ which aid aaribuIÎODI nrcr « 15 IIII.y lie pnICIibed by load npI8dœ. If IIIOI'C or leA Ibm tile QQII8I1t IIIIØIIIII of 0IJIIId)II1Iios II pIkJ for ~ period, ~ IdjaIImeat Iball be IIIIde In COIIDICIIœ wMh IIIbIequcØ ftIIIIa8Dca. A&\u8mr.IIIS 0II1aXIIŒ of errors 111 caatrIbutkD IÇInd of ~ ClllPIøJW may be IIIIdc by cti=t p&yIDIIIà benreeD !be 8111p1oyw 8Dd IbD 8c8nL B. 'ibis ~ sIIaI1 be ðI:tift aD die day of .19_. ~ BOARD OF A'D~~ CITY COONCIL PUBIJC EMPLOYEES' SYSTEM OF 'l'IŒ ~ ~ CITY OP OIULA VISTA ~ By.j ~f:j BY , CHIEF ACTU:~ P1aIdID& 0tIIcer , ACI'UARlAL 0 ~ PVBUC ~ . 1tB'1'IIUDŒNT SYmn.t: ~ ,;/J' ~ --n.~:S> .f ~ Oak AMENDNENl' PJIRS.CON- 7OZA ~. JI95) 9/9-'15' - - - ..- u_- . -._.-....'._"----' :~ú~;:,:---~,-;: ..~..'.~.:-. '.'~.. Thì~~¡;~~~ í~ ío~ the County Cleril's Fi¡i~g- Stamp PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Diego: cv 06320 Proof of Publication of: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over .0RD..LNMI£L.1~L - - - - - - - - -- -- the age of eighteen years, and not a party " to or interested in the above-entitled matter. f I am the prindpal clerk of the printer of the ? STAR-NEWS, CHULA VISTA, a newspaper ---- { of general circulation, published TWICE-WEEKLY in the City of Chula Vista, and the South Bay Judicial District, County of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of April 23, 1951, Case Number 164327; that the notice, of which 1.llon' 1. -Thll an the annexed is a printed copy ( set in type amendment to \!Ie - not smaller than nonpareil), has been ~:r~\~-= published in each regular and entire issue the Board 0' Admini&ralon of said newspaper and not in any CaIi~PUblicEm~;(" Ralirlmenl ~ 1m' J supplement thereof on the following dates, ~~-" to-wit: ched hereto, marl<ed ~ end I7t SUcI,,"' . 7/12 I part hereof hareinlltoilt~ Section all in the year 1995 ~On3.This~ I certify ( or declare) under penalty of sho!II. like affact inI""" -'!OI- perjury that the foregoing is true and tllli altar ....... correct. írforderto <OI1tinutd Ieboi Iiif; '\;:~~ - ~.._forthe Dated at CHULA VISTA . _:labOr _t!letwÍlpra¥e1lt the ,¡iopar end alficiònl \", California, this ~ day of -'='.ili ,1995 " .' ¡; ¡r s¡gnatu::J1 hQ¡f þ JJ. ~~~5~~ ~ I PRINCIPAL CLER' ~ ~ . /9/1/ I COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 9g Meeting Date 06/27 ITEM TITLE: Resolution /79'1/ Unilaterally implementing terms and conditions of employment after impasse for employees represented by the Western Council of Engineers for the period July 8. 1994 through July 6, 1995. SUBMITTED BY: D~, By~,. Ci~ ~'"..'" fm WC~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~G¡ I 5THS vote: Yes_NoX) Representatives from City management and WCE have been meeting and conferring in an effort to agree on a memorandum of understanding (MOU) for FY 1994-95 and beyond if possible. On June 2, 1995, representatives of WCE and the City came to tentative agreement on a four-year MOU covering the period July 8, 1994 through about July I. 1998. On June 20, 1995, the WCE membership held a ratification meeting on the agreement. The membership did not ratify the tentative agreement. At that point it became necessary for the City's negotiation team to issue a letter of impasse to WCE. Impasse was declared by the City on June 20, 1995. A meeting was held with the City Manager acting as the City's Municipal Employee Relations Officer between WCE and the City's negotiation team on June 21, 1995. At the end of a meeting held by WCE members on June 22, 1995, the Municipal Employees' Relations Officer determined that the impasse could not be resolved and it would be necessary to refer the matter to the City Council. Through legislative action (which would be the adoption of the accompanying resolution). the City Council may unilaterally implement terms and conditions for WCE represented employees. Staff recommends that City Council go into Closed Session to discuss the status of negotiations prior to consideration of this item. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution unilaterally implementing terms and conditions of employment for WCE members. BOARDS & COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: As indicated above, City negotiators and WCE negotiators have been meeting and conferring in an attempt to come to an agreement for FY 1994-95. Since WCE membership rejected the tentative agreement that included a provision for granting of 2% at 55 prior to July I, 1995, and CVEA ratified their agreement, it will be necessary for the City Council to unilaterally implement terms and conditions of employment for WCE members that contain the provision of 2 % of 55 if Council ratifies the agreement with CVEA. PERS regulations do not permit granting retirement benefits such as 2 % of 55 to single bargaining units within the miscellaneous (that is non-safety) employee classification. Because the City negotiators knew there was a possibility that WCE members would ~ß-/ r(, Page 3 Item ? ß Meeting Date ~ FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of this Memorandum of Understanding is within the guidelines established by the City Council. The cost of 2 % at 55 during the term of the agreement, net of the savings associated with the five (5) day furlough, is a savings of $14,188. A potential major cost is the survey that will be conducted in Year 4. The City has agreed to provide a wage increase equal to the average of the increases given by all the cities surveyed, however, in no case shall an increase of more than 4% be granted. Other components of the Memorandum of Understanding, and their associated costs, are as follows: . Year 2: a $125 per employee stipend costing a total of $3,500 . Year 3: a $250 per employee stipend costing a total of $7,000 . Year 4: a general salary increase between $0 and $57,196 depending upon the results of the survey. Total costs over the term of this Memorandum of Understanding could range from $10,500 to $67,696 based primarily on the results of the survey. '1ß-} )78-1 RESOLUTION NO. /79'1/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA UNILATERALLY IMPLEMENTING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT AFTER IMPASSE FOR EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE WESTERN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERS FOR THE PERIOD JULY 8, 1994 THROUGH JULY 6, 1995 WHEREAS, the City and Western Council of Engineers (WCE) have been meeting and conferring in good faith; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 1995, representatives of WCE reached tentative agreement; and WHEREAS, WCE membership rej ected ratif ication on June 20, 1995; and WHEREAS, at the point, the city declared impasse; and WHEREAS, all of the impasse provisions in the City's Employer-Employee Relations Policy have been followed and the City's Municipal city Employees Relations Officer has decided on June 22, 1995 that the matter cannot be settled; and WHEREAS, CVEA members ratified an agreement which would implement the 2% @ 55 retirement plan; and WHEREAS, PERS law does not permit the exclusion of any miscellaneous (non-safety) employee groups. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby find and declare an impasse has been reached in negotiations with the WCE bargaining unit and that further discussions will not produce an agreement and that the Charter requires our budget to be adopted prior to the commencement of the fiscal year. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby unilaterally implement terms and conditions of employment after impasse for employees represented by the Western Council of Engineers for the period July 8, 1994 through July 6, 1995. Presented by Approved as to form by ~/J1. Dave Byers, Chief Negotiator Bruce M. for WCE Attorney C:\rs\ispasse.wce C) ß -5) 1B-t; I ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ......... ......... ~ """'" . """" ~ ~ ~ CllY OF CHUlA VISTA MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTL"..NDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ANÐ WESTERN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERS 98-7 ~, ) ~----_..._----- .-.---- --_~__n_.__- - ------ ----------- MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTf.NDINC CONCERNING WAGES AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT p~Ii._.g@~i6Jm!I~wl!¥~):'\BETWEEN THE CITY OF CIIUL/. 'lIST"^. f.ND THE cH'Uï.A\tïSTA CH'AÞTËR, WESTERN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERS FOR FISCAL YEAR ~ 1.01 PREAMBLE 1.02 RECOGNITION 1.03 CITY RIGHTS 1.04 W.c.E. RIGHTS 1.05 DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED 2.01 WAGES 2.01.1 JOB SHARING 2.02 OUT OF CLASS ASSIGNMENT 2.03 EXTRAORDINARY SERVICE 2.04 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 2.05 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 2.06 WORKWEEK 2.07 OVERTIME 2.08 BILINGUAL PAY 2.09 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2.10 RETIREMENT 2.11 HOLIDAYS 2.12 V ACA TION AND SICK LEAVE 2.12.1 PROFESSIONAL LICENSE OR REGISTRATION EXAM LEAVE 2.13 LEAVE OF ABSENCE 2.14 MILITARY LEAVE 2.15 JURY DUTY 2.15.1 COURT LEAVE 2.16 CAREER ADVANCEMENT 2.17 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION 2.18 ACTING APPOINTMENTS 2.19 DRIVING ELIGIBILITY 2.20 SUBST ANCEl ALCOHOL ABUSE POLICY 3.01 PROHIBITED PRACTICES 3.02 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 3.03 TERM 3.04 FULL UNDERSTANDING, MODIFICATION, AND WAIVER 3.05 SAVINGS CLAUSE C;!J ~3' .} \ , , ---------------------"---- ____n______----------------- --------- 1.01 PREAMBLE This MGY ~~¡¡¡~is efttcreà iftte y the ¡:¡¡îii¡¡¡¡:¡~¡¡HÞ'~\I,~City of Chula vištä,IÏërëúiiliër referred to as the "City " :tftd the Cnlila Yist~cj;;;;Ptë~~rth~W~3teYfi Cmmal 6f Eftgtlteers, her eiftafter l'cfen.cà t6 as thc"WCE." 1.02 RECOGNmON Assistant Engineer I Assistant Engineer II AssistMt Citil E~fteer Civil Engineer Assist:tftt Traffic Eftgtftur Associate Traffic Engineer Chief Plans Examiner Land Surveyor 1.03 CITY RIGHTS A. The WCE recognizes that the City has and will continue to retain in all respects, whether exercised or not, the unilateral and exclusive right, subject to this MGYmîîîl:îp,æJìy¡:¡¡; to operate, administer, and manage its public services and its work force pertorffiing those semces. B. The exclusive rights of the City shall include, but not be limited to: . Determining the organization of City government and the purpose and mission of its constituent agencies. . Setting standards of service to be offered to the public and, through its management officials, to exercise control and discretion over its organization and operations. . Establishing and effecting administrative regulations and employment rules consistent with law and the specific provisions of this MOUI~I~#ílq. . Directing its employees. . Determining the City budget. . Taking disciplinary action. . Relieving employees from duty because of a lack of work or for other legitimate reasons. c¡ fJ -7 Page 1 , :> - ------ ----- ------------- . Determining the methods, means, and personnel by which the City's services are to be provided, including the right to schedule and assign work and overtime, and to otherwise act in the interest of efficient service to the City. . Subcontracting out various services whether currently performed by City workforce or not, when no eliminations of current employees will result and management determines it is in the public interest. C. The exercise and retention of the City rights contained herein does not preclude the employees and! or WCE from consulting about the practical consequences that decisions on these matters may have on wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. D. Nothing contained in this provision shall be deemed to supersede the provisions of existing State law and the ordinances and rules of the City which establish the Civil Service System. 1.04 WCE RIGHfS WCE shall have the right to: . Be provided a reasonable amount of space on relevant City bulletin boards for legitimate communications with members. . Be granted use of City facilities by the appropriate authority for meetings composed of WCE members, provided such meetings are held outside regularly scheduled working hours for the group which is meeting, and provided space can be made available without interfering with City needs. WCE ~ 11m provide proper advance notice of such meetings and pay any contingent coSts of security, supervision, damage and clean-up. . . Be allowed reasonable access to employees of the unit at their work locations during working hours for the purpose of consulting with employees in the unit regarding the employer-employee relationship, provided that (1) the work of the employee and the service of the public are not unduly impaired, and (2) the authorized representative shall have given advance notice to the department head or his designated representative when contacting departmental employees during the duty period of the employees. The department head shall determine the appropriate time for such access. . Designate two (2) employees plus alternates who serve as official representatives. Such persons shall be released from work, without loss of compensation, when formally meeting and conferring with management representatives on matters 9!3 - /0 Page 2 Q2, --~-~------------- - ----------------- - ----.------------------- within the scope of representation. One member shall also be released from work without loss of compensation when meeting with management representatives on matters pertaining to an allowable grievance item. . Be provided, upon request, such literature and public documents as may be necessary (i.e., City budget, Workers Compensation benefits). A reasonable duplication charge may be made for items not normally available for wide distribution. . The City of Chula Vista shall bill WCE $.18 per member per pay period for the full costs incurred for dues deduction on behalf of WCE. 1.05 DISCRIMINA nON PROHIBITED Neither the City nor Western Council of Engineers (WCE) shall discriminate in any way on account of race, creed, religion, sex, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, age or disability as provided by law. Western Council of Engineers and those it represents, shall fully cooperate with the City in complying with this requirement of nondiscrimination. 2.01 WAGES A. Due to the current economic conditions, there will be no salary increase for WCE represented positions. This section of the MOUU~lq!fjig!li is agt'eeà t6 by WCE based on WCE's good faith acceptance of the City's claim thät thë City has no funds available for salary increases. The pay range of each classification shall be as listed in the "Salary Plan" attached hereto and made a part hereof. 913 -J 7 Page 3 f'Î - ---------- ------ --------- -------------- ------- -------------------- B. The City shall pay seven percent (7%) of the employee's contribution to PERS for classifications represented by WCE. C. All other payroll and wage changes, such as merit increases, shall be made effective at the beginning of the regular pay period closest to the date of change. D. Distribution of paychecks shall be done only on regular paydays except in an emergency, when employees may receive their check on a day other than a regular payday if a memo is directed from the Department Head to the Finance Officer justifying the request. E. All classifications represented by WCE may receive in advance a maximum of two weeks earned vacation pay. Vacation pay in advance will be made on a regular payday if the employee notifies the Finance Department at least three working days prior to the payday on which payment is desired. F. All Assi3l:Mit Eft!;Înecrs I, Assistant Engineers II and Chief Plans Examiners who become registered by the State of California as a Professional Civil Engineer, Professional Traffic Engineer or Land Surveyor, and such registration is not a requirement of the position held, shall receive five percent (5%) additional compensation. C. Wages fer Assistaftt Cloil Eftgtneer omd ASJist- Tnffie Engineer shall be set at f~oe 3ereeftt ~S%) aee. e tlie "\ssi3l:- ERgffieer II Ie 0 el. 2.01.1 JOB SHARING The City will make reasonable accommodation for an employee in a regular position who desires to share his/her job with another qualified employee or eligible person. Jobs may be shared on an hourly or daily basis. All legally permissible benefits will be pro-rated. Each employee shall be notified in writing by the appointing authority (Director of Public Works) at the time of the appointment and such notification will clearly define the benefits to which each employee is entitled. 16 -)d-- Page 4 ï "----- ----- ---~- ---"---" --- ---"----"--- --------- 2.02 OUT OF CLASS ASSIGNMENT A. When, at the sole discretion of the City, an employee is assigned by the City to perform the duties of a higher paid classification for a period of ten (10) or more consecutive working days, such employee shall receive the next higher step in pay range, or five percent (5%) over the iltiii¡i1!iÎ\j~i~¡i\r e~ ~: ~;: :~~~~!!'~f!!~~!~~~~~!!~~~!:~~!!t!~ day of the temporary appointment. B. This provision is not applicable to situations deemed by the City to be for training or educational purposes. This provision does not apply if a unit member is given an acting appointment to a position not represented by WCE. However, in the event a WCE member was temporarily appointed to a middle management position, City policy concerning middle management would apply. 2.03 EXTRAORDINARY SERVICE A. Extraordinary Service Pay is defined as pay for exceptional performance by an individual at his/her classification level as determined by the department head. B. Eligibility shall be determined by one or more of the following criteria: 1. The employee has performed outstanding work on a continuing basis at his/her current job classification level such as, but not limited to: a) Frequent completion of work significantly ahead of schedule. b) Volume and/or quality of work produced greatly exceeds department norms on a continuing basis. 2. The employee has completed, or is currently working on an assignment which calls for a substantial degree of greater responsibility and/or professional or technical expertise than his/her current job classification requires and is not covered by Temporary Work in a Higher Classification Pay provisions contained herein. 3. The employee has completed, or is currently planning, developing or implementing a special program initiated or suggested by himself/herself and approved by the department head which will provide substantial overall benefit to the department and/or the City. C. Implementation 1. The department head shall, during the months of June and December, meet with his/her supervisory staff to determine if any employee should receive Extraordinary Service Pay for exceptional performance during the past six (6) month period. The 'lfJ -/} Page 5 -----------.--.- ---------- -~----- ----------------- --- ---------------.----------- maximum number of eligible employees during the year shall not exceed three (3) persons. 2. When the department head determines that an employee should receive ESP, it shall be his/her responsibility to determine the amount and to forward his/her recommendation(s) to the City Manager for approval. 3. ESP shall be a lump sum payment of one of the following amounts as determined by the department head and approved by the City Manager: $250, $300, $400, $500 or $600. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days following the City Manager's approval at a staff meeting called for the purpose of presenting the awards. Along with the awards, each recipient will receive a letter of appreciation signed by the City Manager or his/her designated representative which, in part, will give the reasons for that particular award. D. Annual review by the department head(s) or their designated representative(s) and WCE shall be made in the second quarter of each calendar year. The eligibility and implementation procedures shall be reviewed to determine if any revisions, deletions, or additions should be made to this provision (ESP). Changes to this provision (ESP) shall be subject to the mutual approval of the department head(s) and WCE. E. The provisions of this Section shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. The provisions of this Section are separate and distinct from the City's Performance Evaluation System. 2.04 DEFERRED COMPENSATION Employees represented by WCE shall be eligible to participate in the City's approved Deferred Compensation Plan. 2.05 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT Employees in this unit shall be subject to the City's Mileage Reimbursement Program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. 26<t per mile first 200 miles each month 24<t per mile next 300 miles each month 22<t per mile over 500 miles each month 2.06 WORK WEEK A. Definition - The work week is a fixed and regular recurring period of work hours during the seven consecutive 24 hour periods beginning at 12:01 a.m. on Friday and ending at 12:00 a.m. the following Friday morning. Excepting overtime, the work day will commence no earlier than 7:00 a.m. and end no later than 6.00 p.m.. ñiRQ¡:¡!I! 915 -/f Page 6 :-(' -- -------- ------------ __m______-- B. Work Schedules are four types of schedules utilized in the Department of Public Works. Each of these schedules fall within the normal two week payroll cycle: h(#) Regular Work Schedule - A five day, 40 hour week with an eight hour day and a choice of a 30 - 120 minute lunch period. ~), Flex-time Schedule - A non-regular work schedule with a consistent pattern as to the number of work hours per day, but an arrangement whereby the employee is obligated to perform work and be responsible for flexing the hours of his/her own work schedule in accordance with written arrangements agreed to by the employees and the appointing authority. ~(~J Flex-Week Schedule (4/10) - The Flex-week Schedule (4/10) consists of four 10-hour days during a one week period with a choice of a 30 - 60 minute lunch period. ~g) Flex-week Schedule - The Flex-week schedule consists of four 9-hour days and one one-half day during a one week period with a choice of a 30 - 120 minute lunch period. C. Policy and Procedures 1. Individual employee's preference will be considered whenever possible based upon seniority, satisfactory work performance and the needs of the department within each work unit in choosing a particular work schedule. However, the overriding factor to be considered in allowing variable work schedules shall be that all work units are adequately staffed, including supervision, from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 2. 3. Should the production and efficiency of an individual or work unit on a variable work schedule not meet the department's needs, as determined by the department head, it shall be the division head's prerogative to alter individual work schedules or schedules of a work unit. ...........-- Page 7 '1(5 - /~ J -------- ----------- - ~--- --------- ----------- 4. An employee may be required to alter his/her work schedule, either temporarily or permanently to provide adequate coverage when other personnel are absent, vacancies exists, when holidays create time constraints, or when peak load requirements demand. Except in cases of emergency operations or unforeseen absences, proper notice of a change in work schedule arising from other than a transfer or promotion shall be given the affected employee. Proper notice shall be two weeks notice. Failure to give proper notice to the employee shall entitle the affected employee to compensation for all hours actually worked on the new schedule which are at variance from the employee's previous schedule until proper notice is given. S. If an empls) ee I"eqltests in 'i\ fiting 8. ehMige iR '1\ srl. sehedltle fer the eæpl8) ee' s 8- wn. enienee, Mid Slteft reqlieJt is appt a . ed, the eæpla) ee shall 'i\ iii. ea. ertÏlne nsttlting f~aft1 the sehe.lt1le ehMlge 8.S bng as the tatal nttmber af hðt113 .laes liat exeeed 19 ili 11ft) aRe 'i\ ark 'i\ eek. 6-.p¡ Time off for vacation or sick leave shall be charged in accordance with the employees . . work schedule for the days in question. Holidays are credited for eight hours. Depending upon the work schedule (i.e., for days in excess of eight hours) an employee shall make up the additional time or take vacation time off for the excess. 2.07 OVERTIME A. Definition - Whenever an employee is ordered to work more than 40 hours in a work week they shall be granted overtime pay at the rate of 1 ~ times their Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) "Regular Rate" or compensatory time off at 1 ~ times the extra hours worked (except as stated in Section 2.06.). Such overtime work shall be only at the direction of and first approved by the employee's i=ediate supervisor. Payment for overtime shall be made during the pay period wherein the overtime was earned. A record of compensatory overtime earned and utilized shall be maintained on the biweekly pay records. Compensatory overtime shall not be accrued to an employee's credit for any time in excess of 40 hours. Reimbursement for overtime with time off or pay will be at the option of the supervisor and the department head based on the employee's request while recognizing the overall departmental staffing requirements. "Time Worked" - Includes all paid hours including sick leave, leaves during which Workers' Compensation is paid, vacation time, holidays or any other time away from the job that is paid. B. Administration of Overtime - All time worked in addition to the work week with the exception of insignificant amounts of "hours worked" will be counted toward the 40 hour work week. Insignificant amounts of hours worked is defined as any time worked outside the regular schedule that is less than 15 minutes in a day, unless definition is changed in Federal Regulations or by court action. Tð-/~ PageS éì-Ì , ; - --.------.---- --_._----~----- 2.08 BILINGUAL PAY The City recognizes that employees from various divisions and sections may be eligible for bilingual pay. WCE members who upon recommendation of the department head, approval of the Personnel Department and City Manager, and successful completion of a Bilingual Performance Evaluation are required to continuously use their bilingual skills in the performance of their duties, will receive $40 a month in addition to their regular pay. 2.09 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS A. Flexible Benefit Plan 1. Description of Program - From , f!P1§Hg¡¡,îIm*Ê¡f~~!!¡ each represented employee shall receive, beuseds()ldy f()rapproved e.mployee benefits. , 7, 1991, the Flex Plan Affiotmt shall be iacreaseà b, $130, te $5,501.70. 2. Adnùnistration of Program (a) From June 15 through June 30 of the fiscal year, requests for reimbursement under the City's "Flexible Benefit Plan" will be approved for "emergency" expenses only. An emergency is defined as an unforeseen occurrence or combination of circumstances which necessitated immediate action. Requests for reimbursements for purchases made by employees after June 15 for those items and services rendered which are not of a routine nature, will be reviewed on an individual bases by Personnel to determine if an emergency existed. Upon approval of emergency requests, reimbursements will be granted. Examples: . Emergency medical expenses not covered by insurance for an illness that requires the services of a doctor, clinic, or hospital including auxiliary services (emergency transportation, lab tests, prescriptions and so forth) will be covered. . Emergency Vision Expenses-Repair of broken eyeglasses or replacement of lost contact lenses will be approved. (Note: routine eye exam, spare glasses, etc.). . Emergency Dental Expenses-Reimbursements for expenses associated with toothaches, broken teeth, impacted wisdom teeth, root canals, etc. will be covered. (Note: routine dental work done as a result of an exam done after June 1.) 9tJ~/7 Page 9 , ,,-, ~-----~~------ u_---- ---~--------- ~_m______-- . Non-mediiial items considered routine and not covered include: conferencé.expenses, books, memberships, subscriptions, extra insurance (except authorized payroll deductions). (b) Reimbursements shall be for a minimum of $50 except from May 15 to June 30 of the fiscal year when no minimum will be required for reimbursement. Reimbursement will be processed generally on a bi-weekly basis. (c) Employees who are on a leave of absence, unless such leave is due to disability or suspension for disciplinary reasons, may not utilize their Flex Plan benefit during the absence (see Section 2.13 Leave of Absence). (d) Employees may not utilize their flex plan benefits to pre-pay health or dental insurance premiums for periods after they retire or otherwise terminate from City employment. 3. Content of Program - The Flexible Benefit Plan will consist of one mandatory selection and additional optional selections. (a) Mandatory Selection Hospital, Medical and Life Benefits (Employee) Each represented employee must select one of the medical plans offered by the City for health protection. Employee coverage includes a $3,000 group term life policy. In addition, the City will provide an additional $7,000 group term life insurance policy for each represented employee for a total of $10,000. In the case of two City employees who are married to each other, one spouse may cover the other as a dependent. (b) Optional Selections (1) Hospital/Medical Care Benefits (Dependents) A represented employee may elect dependent coverage under the approved City sponsored health plans under one of two categories of coverage either "Employee plus one" or "employee plus family" coverage. (2) Prepaid dental insurance benefits offered by the City for employee, employees plus one or employee plus family coverage. (3) Reimbursable Programs A represented employee may elect to receive reimbursement for the following expenditures with any balance left after the purchase of health insurance for the employee and! or the employee and dependents. The ¡!J Page 10 \ ----~-_._------ u_--- ------------------ descriptions below are general in nature. Eligible programs shall be the same as those for the Mid-Management Group. Specific rules for allowable reimbursements will be based on applicable Internal Revenue Code (IRe) sections. 8 Vision, Dental and Medical Each represented employee may apply any remaining portion (after mandatory costs are paid) to out-of-pocket vision, dental and medical costs on a reimbursement basis. Employees remain free to be attended by a practitioner of their own choosing. 8 Educational Assistance Employees may select to receive reimbursement for expenses incurred for education directly related to their work. Allowable expenses include tuition, fees, and similar payments, books, supplies, and equipment. Expenses not allowed for reimbursement include books, tools or supplies which are retained by an employee after completion of a course of instruction, or meals, lodging, or transportation. Employees must obtain approval of the department head and the Director of Personnel prior to enrollment in the desired course. Educational assistance reimbursements under this section must be considered non-taxable in accordance with State and Federal laws. To receive funds in advance, employees must read and sign the Advance Funds Request Form available in the Personnel Department and have it approved by their Department Head and Training Coordinator. Upon completion of a course of instruction, employees must submit evidence of a C grade or better, pass/fail or the equivalent based upon how the course is structured or advanced funds must be returned immediately. 8 Physical Exam Employees may elect to receive reimbursement for a voluntary physical exam from the physician of their choice. 8 Supplemental Life Insurance Each represented employee may purchase additional group life insurance (in accordance with IRC §79) in addition to the $10,000 group term life insurance provided by the City under Section 3(a) above. 9fJ ~/Î Page 11 -~ ---------- ---- ------------------- ----~--------_._._------ ------~._-_. . Miscellaneous Categories Employees may elect to apply any remaining portion (after mandatory costs are paid) towards deductible and out-of-pocket health plan costs. . Dependent Care Employee may receive reimbursement for dependent care expenses incurred in order to allow the employee to work for the City. Dependent care reimbursements from the Flexible Benefit Plan, alone or in combination with a Dependent Care FSA, cannot exceed $5,000 per calendar year (refer to Section 2.09.BA.{b}) . Supplemental Health Insurance Employees may receive reimbursement for the costs of any City sponsored health insurance plans which supplement the existing City-offered health plans. Examples of such insurance may include cancer insurance or intensive care insurance. . Group Vision Care If available, employees may individually purchase group vision care offered by the City. . Group Psychological Health Plan If available, employees may individually purchase group psychological health plan offered by the City. B. Additional Benefits 1. Long-Term Disability - The City ~ ., contribute the amount necessary to provide long-term disability protection for each employee represented by WCE in accordance with the following: The plan will include a thirty (30) day waiting period, a maximum benefit of 60% of salary up to $7,500/month. The plan will provide benefits until age 65 in the event a disability prevents the employee from perfornÜng his or her own occupation, and is subject to the provisions of existing applicable insurance and retirement plans. 2. Employees will be eligible to deposit a maximum of 20% of the beginning flex plan balance into the deferred compensation plan if the employee matches the deposit with a like contribution from his/her paycheck. The allowability of this provision is conditioned on approval by the IRS. If it is disallowed by the IRS, the parties will 9!J ~020 Page 12 m____- ------------------------ - ---------- reopen this portion of the contract to discuss this issue. Employees are responsible for completing the appropriate forms to defer flex plan monies. 3. Professional Enrichment - A special fund of $5,500 will be established for use by represented employees in FY -l-993-94~!lI~~. Employees must receive approval from his/her department head and Director of Personnel before funds may be claimed for reimbursement out of the special fund. The maximum reimbursement per employee is $211.50 for Fiscal Year -l-993-94~~~~tj¡,q. However, with approval of the department head, a represented member may consent to allocate up to $211.50 of his/her entitlement to another represented member. Reimbursement to any individual employee may not exceed $423. Funds paid to the employee from the Professional Enrichment special fund may be reportable as part of gross income to the employee. Professional enrichment allowable reimbursements shall include, but not be limited to: 1. Conferences and Seminars 2. Professionally related dues 3. College courses 4. Books and supplies associated with course work or professional development 5. _~i~i~~¡~¡ÎJ ~=~ ~~iiì¡¡ ~ :~~= ~~~; ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~t!,!~~ 6. Lodging at conferences and seminars 7. Meals at conferences and seminars ($30 per day maximum) 8. Periodicals and subscriptions 9. Application fees for licensing examinations 10. Professional registration fees. 11. Hand-held scientific calculators, peripherals and computer software. NOTE: With regard to computer software, all purchases shall be work related, compatible with software used by the City and subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and/or Public Works Director. Ftirther, the City'" ill implemCftt J.tid polie, for a Jix ffi61!.th trial. baJiJ, c6mmefteifig ttp61!. C6~fteilllflflr6.aI. af the MOD, 'l\it~ the ti~i~ateral.right at the end 6f that 7ð~02-1 Page 13 ----- -----.---------- -"----_."-- hours shall not be considered time worked Of iiltthol'Ü:eà for overtime!.. Such expenses must be related to the employees' professional or technical growth. The purpose of this special fund is to reimburse employees for those types of expenses that are not eligible for reimbursement under Educational Assistance. Professional enrichment will also be administered in accordance with State and Federal laws. 4. Flexible Spending Accounts for Health Care and Dependent Care Two Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs), under Sections 125, lOS, 129 and 213 of the Internal Revenue Service Code, are offered to all represented employees. Employees may elect to budget by salary reduction, for certain health and welfare benefits and dependent care reimbursements on a pre-tax basis. If the City does not meet IRS regulations or if the IRS regulations change for any reason, this benefit may be discontinued. a) Health and Welfare FSA Before the start of the FSA plan year (Tanuary 1 to December 31), represented employees may reduce their salary up to $2,500 to pay for eligible health and welfare expenses. Salary reductions will accrue bi-weekly during the plan year and reimbursements will be made on a schedule to be determined by the City. This is a reimbursement program. Participating employees must submit documentation of payment on the appropriate forms to receive reimbursement. Salary reductions not spent by the end of the plan year, by law, are forfeited to the City. b) Dependent Care FSA Before the start of the FSA plan Year (Tanuary 1, to December 31), represented employees may reduce their salary up to $5,000 to pay for eligible dependent care. In no event can dependent care pre-tax dollars, whether reimbursed through an FSA, the City Flexible Benefit Plan or a combination of both, exceed $5,000 per calendar year (refer to Section 2.09.A.3(b)(3). Salary reductions will accrue bi-weekly during the plan year and reimbursements will be made on a schedule to be determined by the City. Dependent care must qualify under all pertinent IRS regulations. This is a reimbursement program. Participating employees must submit documentation of payment and other information related to dependent care arrangements to receive reimbursement. Salary reductions not spent by the end of the plan year, by law, are forfeited to the City. c) FSA Administration The City reserves the right to contract with a Third Party Administrator (TP A) for administration of both FSA's. The City will pay the start-up costs 93 -~;L Page 14 " - ------- - ------ ~------ associated with third party administration. Participating employees will pay monthly, per employee, or per transaction administration fees, if any. 5. Health and Dental Payroll Deductions Treated as Pre-Tax Under Sections 125, 105, and 213 of the Internal Revenue Service Code, the City will treat all payroll deductions for health and dental care on a pre-tax basis, unless an affected employee requests such deductions be taxed. If the City does not meet IRS regulations or if the IRS regulations change for any reason, this benefit may be discontinued. 6. Medical Premium Retirement Benefit Plan The City will offer a medical premium retirement benefit plan, under Section 457(f) of the Internal Revenue Service Code, to all represented employees through the ]PEBA, Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority (or an equivalent plan). This program will provide employees the option of making unlimited pre-tax contributions from their wages to pre-fund post-retirement health insurance premium costs for themselves and their dependents. Since IRS Section 457(f) requires restrictions on the program that can result in forfeiture of the contributions to the City for specified reasons, employees are advised to carefully review the information that will be provided on the program prior to deciding whether or when to participate. The City will pay the start-up costs associated with third party administration. Participating employees will pay the participant costs (currently $24 per year). If the City does not meet IRS regulations or if the IRS regulations change for any reason, this benefit will be discontinued. 7. Supplemental Life Insurance Represented employees may purchase from $30,000 to $300,000 of group term supplemental life insurance in $10,000 increments through the City's group insurance plan with said employees paying the additional~ cost through payroll deduction. 2.10 RETIREMENT A. The City shall provide the 2% at 6G~~ retirement for miscellaneous employees as provided for under the Public Employees Retirement 9!J /~) Page 15 -------~--------------- - - - .-------~---~-----~----------------------------~ B. Additional Retirement Benefits All WCE represented employees will receive Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefit under PERS Sections 21380-21387, and 21382.4). The PERS 1959 Survivors Benefit employee premium cost of $2.00 per month will continue to be paid by the City. All refunds of employee contributions or additional costs of employee retirement contributions mandated by the courts and! or requested by PERS because of court decisions during the life of the contract will be reimbursed to or paid by the employee. 2.11 HOLIDAYS ~~~gí¡~~~¡i~i[f_iìLí~ì¡~i!i~~~3 agmffieHt, the ree6gHizeå ft6liJa, 3 areB~[9~!ÂIj~¡¡ Cjt) Offices Cle"à FY 199391 Ieàl!!eadeRee Do) ~ ~ ~ Th...It.gi ,jag DIIj ~ D"1 .her TRanJ.sginag ~ ~ ~ Ne", Year's DOo) ~ Melllea'" Do) ~ 1. Holiday Pay - Employees shall receive eight (8) hours pay at their regular hourly rate for each fixed holiday payable during the pay period in which the regular holiday occurs. 2. F or employees who work the traditional Monday through Friday work week, overtime i~~~~~~¡i ~ ~ ~ :5e e o~Pa~~~?~~'!~!~~!i!!i~~!!;~~l~'!! 1.ð õ21 Page 16 .'-, -------,- ,---- -----------------_____n______----------------- 3. If a fixed holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be observed as the holiday. If a fixed holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as the holiday. B. Floating Holidays: 1. Amount - Effective the first pay period in July of each fiscal year of this iigrcemcftt ~!li9î:'Jm!!., employees shall be credited with thirty-two (32) hours floating holiday i:ìi1ïë,ëighihoUrs each for: Lincoln's Birthday, Washington's Birthday, Admission Day and Veteran's Day. Employees may take floating holiday time at their discretion with the approval of their department head. 2. Floating Holiday Use - If an employee uses floating holiday time before the holiday passes and subsequently leaves City service, they will be charged for such time, If employees do not use their floating holiday time before June 30 of the fiscal year, they will lose such time. The smallest unit of time chargeable to floating holiday time is one half hour. 2.12 VACATION AND SICK LEAVE A. Definition - For the purpose of this section, the following definitions shall apply: 1. "Continuous Service" means City service uninterrupted by separation. 2. "Intermittent service" means City service interrupted by separation. 3. "Time worked" includes all paid time. 4. "Active service" includes time worked, leave of absence without pay not to exceed 14 calendar days, and leave of absence not to exceed one (1) year for which Workers Compensation is paid. B. Vacation 1. Vacation Accrual- ~qThm#.~œiÂ~!¡Each employee paid biweekly shall be entitled to vacation with pay.i'hëtol1owlngprovisions shall apply: (a) Employees will accrue 10 working days during the first year of service. This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 3.07 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. (b) Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 10 working days annually (cumulative to a total leave balance of 20 working days) during the second through fourth year of service. This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 3.07 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. 9!J-c2~ Page 17 P)? ----- ----------------"------ (c) Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 15 working days annually (cumulative to a total leave balance of 30 working days) during the fifth through fifteenth year of service. The benefits will be accumulated at the rate of 4.60 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. (d) Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 20 working days annually (cumulative to a total leave balance of 40 working days) during the sixteenth and succeeding years of service. This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 6.14 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. Maximum Vacation Accrual - At no time may an employee have more than two years of vacation leave accumulated. No credits shall be accrued above this limit and any time in excess of the two-year limitation will be lost. (e) Vacation accrual rate changes will become effective at the beginning of the pay period closest to the actual date of change. 2. Each part-time employee paid at a biweekly rate shall be entitled to vacation with pay. The number of working days of such vacation shall be computed on the basis set forth in subsection (b), (c), or (d) and shall be in the proportion that such part-time employment bears to full-time employment. 3. Employees separated from the City service, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, shall be granted all of the unused vacation to which they are entitled based upon continuous service computed on the basis set forth in subsections (b), (c) and (d). Payment shall be made hour for hour with any portion of an hour being considered a full hour. 4. Vacation Use - Vacation leave balances shall be reduced for actual time not worked to the nearest quarter hour for reasons allowable under this section. Absence may not be charged to vacation not already accumulated. C. Sick Leave 1. Accumulated paid sick leave credit is to be used for the sole purpose of protecting the employee's wages in the event absence is made necessary because of disability due to injury or illness of the employee or members of their immediate family. 2. Sick Leave Accrual - Computation of sick leave: Sick leave with pay is cumulative at the rate of 3.68 working hours for each biweekly pay period of service, 96 hours annually, beginning at the time of full-time probationary employment. A person who has held a position with temporary or interim status and is appointed to a position with probationary status, without a break in service, may have such time credited to sick leave upon the reco=endation of the department head and Director of Personnel and with the approval of the City Manager. 3. Maximum Sick Leave Accumulation - Unused sick leave may be accumulated in an unlimited amount. 96-02? Page 18 .,: ------- -- ------ - ----- - ~---------- 4. Sick Leave Use - Sick leave balances shall be reduced for actual time not worked to the nearest quarter hour for reasons allowable under this section. Absence for illness may not be charged to sick leave not already accumulated. 5. Sick Leave Verification - The City may, in its discretion, require a doctor's certificate and! or a personal sworn affidavit verifying the nature, severity and cause of the disabling injury or illness of the employee in order to determine eligibility for sick leave. If an employee is to be required to furnish a doctor's certificate, the employee shall be notified by their supervisor that a doctor's certificate shall be required when the employee notifies the City that they will be absent by reason of illness or disability. 6. Bereavement Leave - When an employee with permanent status is compelled to be absent from work because of the death of an immediate family member, an immediate family member of the employee's spouse, or any other person defined by the Internal Revenue Service as a dependent, and after such employee makes a written request and receives written approval from the department head, such employee may be allowed the privilege to be absent from work with full pay up to five (5) days, plus reasonable travel time. Travel time will be actual time used not to exceed three (3) calendar days. Paid leave of absence for family death shall be charged to sick leave. 7. Sick Leave Reimbursement (a) WCE members using four (4) days of sick leave or less during the fiscal year shall have the option of converting twenty-five percent (25%) of their remaining yearly sick leave pay. (b) Pay shall be computed based on the following schedule and all computations shall be rounded to the nearest whole hour: REMAINING YEARLY SICK LEAVE PAY OPTION (25%) 12 days 3 days 11 days 2 days, 6 hrs. 10 days 2 days, 4 hrs. 9 days 2 days, 2 hrs. 8 days 2 days 7 days or less 0 (c) If the pay option is selected, the paid sick leave hours shall be subtracted from the employee's accumulated yearly sick leave balance. The remaining sick leave hours shall be carried over and accumulated. (Example: Employee uses 4 days sick leave. They then elect to receive pay for 25% of remaining days, or 2 days. The 2 days are subtracted from their remaining yearly sick leave and the other 6 days are added to the employee's accumulated sick leave balance.) 9~ -c2) Page 19 ------- ------------------ (d) Payment will be made during the month of July of each year. Pay will be computed based on the employee's salary step on June 15. (~) Payment will be made only to members on the payroll twelve consecutive months prior to the payoff calculation. Permanent employees who retire during the fiscal year will be compensated under this plan based upon their formal retirement date. Prorated payments will not be made to employees who terminate during the fiscal year. However, in the event of the death of an individual while employed by the City, 50% of the employee's unused, accumulated sick leave will be paid to the appropriate beneficiary. 2.12.1 PROFESSIONAL liCENSE OR REGISTRATION EXAMINATION LEAVE Represented employees who have made application for and are scheduled to participate in a licensure examination for Professional Engineer, Professional Traffic Engineer, or Land Surveyor shall, upon verification by the appointing authority, be granted time with pay to participate in any such part of the examination which is scheduled during City work hours. Such time off shall be granted one time only and shall not be charged to any leave time. 2.13 LEAVE OF ABSENCE Employees who are mentally or physically incapacitated to perform their duties, or who desire to engage in a course of study that will, in the judgement of the City, increase their usefulness on their return to the classified service or who, for any reason considered to be in the best interest of the City government by the appointing authority and the Director of Personnel, and with the approval of the City Manager, be granted leave of absence without payor benefits for a period not to exceed one year. Employees asking for leave of absence without pay shall submit their request in writing stating the reasons why, in their opinion, the request should be granted, the date when they desire the leave to begin, and the probable date of their return. For each leave without pay, the Director of Personnel shall determine whether the employee granted such leave shall be entitled to their former position on their return from such leave or whether their name shall be placed on the reinstatement list for the class as provided for in the Civil Service rules. If a request for leave is denied, a copy of such request and the reasons for denial shall be sent to the Civil Service Commission. An employee who is granted an unpaid leave of absence for more than one month for any reason, including a leave for disciplinary purposes, shall pay the cost of health and life insurance premiums for the entire period of the leave of absence, provided, however, that this provision shall not apply if the leave of absence is a result of the employee being ill or disabled. 2.14 MILITARY LEAVE Military leave shall be granted in accordance with the provisions of applicable State and Federal laws (California Military and Veteran's Code). 9ß~c2~ Page 20 ---------^- --~-- -- --^-~---~-------^---------~~----^----^ ------------- -----~----------- 2.15 JURY DUlY Permanent and probationary employees who are called to serve on jury duty for any county, state o.r federal court within the San Diego area shall be entitled to paid leave under the following cIrcumstances: 1. They must present to their supervisor the court order to appear for jury duty at least three weeks prior to their date to report. 2. All fees received by the employee for jury duty for days when scheduled for work, excluding mileage, shall be paid over to the City. 3. The employee must submit a daily court authorized, stamped time card accounting for all hours of required service ordered by the court. 4. If jury service and travel time from court to work is less than five hours in a work day, the employee is expected to return to work unless a justification is provided and approved or pre- authorized leave is approved. 5. Employees who are required to serve jury duty on their scheduled days off will not be compensated for this time and may keep any fees paid by the court. 6. If the employee is not required to report for jury duty on any particular day(s) they are then expected to be at work as per their normal schedule. 7. It is the employee's responsibility to inform his or her supervisor on a daily basis if they are required to report for jury duty the following day. This may include calling the supervisor after or before normal working hours. 8. Absence due to jury duty will be submitted on the City leave form. 2.15.1 Court Leave Court leave is paid leave granted by the City to enable an employee to fulfill his/her duty as a citizen to serve as a witness in a court action to which the employee is not a party, before a Federal, Superior, or Municipal Court located within San Diego County. Court leave shall be limited to: 1. Required attendance before Federal, Superior, Municipal, Justice Courts located within San Diego County. 2. Time in attendance at court together with reasonable travel time between court and work if attendance is for less than a full day and the employee can reasonably be expected to return to work. 3. Court leave shall not be granted when the employee is paid an expert witness fee. 51!] - ;¿ ï Page 21 -------------- -- - ------------------------- -------------------- 4. The employee must submit to the City any payment received for court leave except travel and subsistence pay for such duty. 5. Court leave shall not be granted to employees who are not litigants in the civil case nor related to litigants in the civil case or defendants in a criminal case. 6. Employees shall provide their supervisor with a copy of the legal subpoena and provide other documentary evidence of service. 2.16 CAREER ADVANCEMENT A. Promotion 1. The Assistant Engineer I classification will be considered as career advancement to the Assistant Engineer II level. Employees will not be required to undergo a promotional exam but will qualify for certification upon (1) fulfillment of a minimum of one year as an Assistant Engineer I and upon forwarding of a positive recommendation by the relevant appointing authority or (2) becoming registered as a professional engineer by the State of California. Permanent employees who advance from the Assistant Engineer I classification under #(1) above to the Assistant Engineer II level shall not be subjected to an additional probationary period. Employees who advance from the Assistant Engineer I level as a result of #(2) above, shall serve at least a six month probationary period at the Assistant Engineer II level and at least a combined total of one year as an Assistant Engineer I and! or Assistant Engineer II. 2. Employees classified as an Assistant Engineer II will be aà.ftReeà t8 the classifieati811. e4!¡¡:¡t~Mt4¡¡'~{Ií'il!m.i.~_~~tt4~ Assistant Civil Engineer or Assistant Traffic E~ghî~ê;:;:;po~(~)¡;~¿oñûngrêgi~têred as a Professional Civil Engineer or Professional Traffic Engineer by the State of California; and (b) upon completion of the probationary period specified above and upon forwarding of a positive recommendation by the relevant appointing authority. 2.17 LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION During the term of this agi'eeæcftt 1~~li!ii, the City ~ $1m explore ongoing relationship with this unit beyond the traditionälnegotiätion process. The objective is to jointly develop and implement programs designed to improve City operations and enhance employee satisfaction. 2.18 ACTING APPOINTMENTS In the absence of an eligible list, upon the recommendation of the Department Head and the Director of Personnel, and with approval of the City Manager, a unit member may be appointed on an "acting" basis to a vacant position if he/she meets the desired qualifications. He/she shall receive a minimum compensation equal to five percent (5%) over their current salary, or step A of the new salary range, whichever is greater. The effective date of such increase will be the first working day of the acting appointment. Employees so appointed will maintain their status in their regular position and receive earned salary increases if they would otherwise be eligible. '13 --30 Page 22 1'-;' , ~ _._-_._-------~- 2.19 DRIVING ELIGIBILITY Whenever an employee drives a vehicle for City business he or she shall have a valid California Drivers License. In order to ascertain the validity of the employee's licenses, employees must present their drivers license to their supervisor upon request. The City reserves the right to check at any time with the Department of Motor Vehicles to determine if the license is valid. If an employee's drivers license is revoked, suspended or otherwise made invalid, the employee must inform his or her supervisor. Failure to notify the supervisor may result in immediate disciplinary action. An employee who does not posses a valid California Drivers License will be considered for a non- driving position, if one is available in the employee's classification. The non-driving assignment will continue for a maximum of six months if there is a reasonable expectation the employee will have a valid California Drivers License at the expiration of that time. Extensions to the six month limit will be considered on a case-by-case basis, however, in no case shall an employee receive more than one non-driving assignment in any three-year period. When no non-driving assignment is available, employees must request a leave of absence without pay for six months or such time as their license is once again valid, whichever is shorter. In order to assure that non-driving assignments are provided on a fair and equitable basis, the following procedures shall be observed: 1. Each department will determine whether or not it has any non-driving assignments that can be filled by employees who would otherwise have driving assignments. 2. Non-driving assignments will be given on a first come, first served basis. For example, if two employees in a department have non-valid drivers licenses and there is only one non-driving assignment, the first employee who comes forward will be given the non-driving assignment. The other employee may apply for a leave of absence as described above. 2.20 SUBSTANCE/ALCOHOL ABUSE PROGRAM Represented employees are subject to the current substance abuse policy as stated in Resolution No. 13971, as adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on February 21, 1989. 3.01 PROHIBITED PRACTICES A. WCE pledges it shall not cause, condone or counsel its unit members or any of them to strike, fail to fully and faithfully perform duties, slow down, disrupt, impede or otherwise impair the normal functions and procedures of the City. B. Should any unit employees during the term of this Memorandum of UHàecJtmàffig breach the obligations of Section A above, the City Manager or his designee shall immediately notify WCE that an alleged prohibited action is in progress. C. WCE shall forthwith, and in any event, within eight working hours disavow said strike or other alleged prohibited action, shall advise such members orally and in writing to immediately return to work and! or cease the prohibited activity and provide the City 9!S--y / Page 23 ---------------- Manager with a copy of its advisement or, alternatively, accept the responsibility for the strike or other prohibited activity. D. If WCE disavows the prohibited activity and takes all positive actions hereunder in good faith, the City shall not hold WCE financially or otherwise responsible. The City may impose such penalties or sanctions as the City may appropriately assess against the participants. E. Should WCE during the term of this Memorandum af Unàclstanàffig breach its obligations or any of them under this section, it is >I1;Fccà th.tt the City shall pursue all legal and administrative remedies available to the City that in its discretion it may elect to pursue. 3.02 GRŒVANCEPROCEDURE This grievance procedure shall be in effect during the full term of this Memorandum -ef Uftàcl'stwdift¡;. Section 1. PURPOSE. The purposes and objectives of the Grievance Procedure are to: (1) Resolve disputes arising from the interpretation, application or enforcement of specific terms of this agrCCffiCIlt I~igt¡jft_. (2) Encourage the settlement of disagreements informally at the employee-supervisor level and provide an orderly procedure to handle grievances through the several supervisory levels where necessary. (3) Resolve grievances as quickly as possible and correct, if possible, the causes of grievances thereby reducing the number of grievances and future similar disputes. Section 2. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this grievance procedure the following definitions shall apply: (1) Manager: The City Manager or his/her authorized representative. (2) Day: A calendar day, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and hard holidays as described by this agmffiellt 11J,9~1~.. (3) Department head or head of a department: The chief executive officer of a department. (4) Director of Personnel: The Director of Personnel or his/her authorized representative. (5) Employee: Any officer or regular (not temporary) employee of the City, except an elected official. (6) Employee representative: An individual who speaks on behalf of the employee. (7) Grievance: A complaint of an employee or group of employees arising out of the application or interpretation of a specific clause in this agrecffiCIlt 1.98.11 75 - Jd}- Page 24 - -- --------------------- (8) Immediate supervisor: The individual who assigns, reviews, or directs the work of an employee. (9) Superior: The individual to whom an immediate supervisor reports. Section 3. REVIEWABLE AND NON-REVIEWABLE GRIEVANCES. (1) To be reviewable under this procedure a grievance must: (a) Concern matters or incidents that have occurred in alleged violation of a specific clause in this itgf'ecmcftt and (b) Specify the relief sought, which relief must be within the power of the City to grant in whole or in part. (2) A grievance is not reviewable under this procedure if it is a matter which: (a) Is subject to those reserved City Management Rights as stipulated under Section 4 of the Employer-Employee Relations Policy for the City of Chula Vista or under management rights as specified in this ftgt'ccmcftt 11I-9fe!!.. (b) Is reviewable under some other administrative procedure and/or rules of the Civil Service Commission such as: 1. Applications for changes in title, job classification or salary. 2. Appeals from formal disciplinary proceeding. 3. Appeals arising out of Civil Service examinations. 4. Appeals from work performance evaluations. 5. Appeals that have Affirmative Action or civil rights remedy. (c) General complaints not directly related to specific clauses of this itgf'ccæcftt 1.9~~mL (d) Would require the modification of a policy established by the City Council or by law. (e) Relates to any City group insurance or retirement programs. Section 4. GENERAL PROVISION OF THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. (1) Grievances may be initiated only by the employee or employees concerned and may not be pursued without his/her or their consent. ;iff ~3J Page 25 0 -----------, --------,-------- ---,------------------- (2) Procedure for Presentation: In presenting his/her grievance, the employee shall follow the sequence and the procedure outlined in Section 5. (3) Prompt Presentation. The employee shall discuss his/her grievance with his/her immediate supervisor within ten (10) working days after the act or omission of management causing the grievance, or within ten (10) working days of when the employee, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered the act or omission being grieved. (4) Prescribed Form. The written grievance shall be submitted on a form prescribed by the Director of Personnel for this purpose. (5) Statement of Grievance. The grievance shall contain a statement of: (a) The specific situation, act or acts complained of as aft agreement violation; (b) The inequity or damage suffered by the employee; and (c) The relief sought. (6) Employee Representative. The employee may choose someone to represent his/her at any step in the procedure. No person hearing a grievance need recognize more than one representative for any employee at anyone time, unless he/she so desires. (7) Handled During Working Hours. Whenever possible, grievances will be handled during the regularly scheduled working hours of the parties involved. (8) Extension of Time. The time limits within which action must be taken or a decision made as specified in this procedure may be extended by mutual written consent of the parties involved. A statement of the duration of such extension of time must be signed by both parties involved at the step to be extended. (9) Consolidation of Grievances. If the grievance involves a group of employees or if a number of employees file separate grievances on the same matter, the grievances shall, whenever possible, be handled as a single grievance. (10) Settlement. Any complaint shall be considered settled without prejudice at the completion of any step if all parties are satisfied or if neither party presents the matter to a higher authority within the prescribed period of time. (11) Reprisal. The grievance procedure is intended to assure a grieving employee the right to present his/her grievance without fear of disciplinary action or reprisal by his/her supervisor, superior or department head, provided he/she observes the provisions of this grievance procedure. 5'tJ -:3'1 Page 26 I r" --------- -- - -------- -------------- (12) Back pay. The resolution of a grievance shall not include provisions for back pay retroactive further than twenty (20) working days prior to the date the grievance is filed. However, if with the exercise of reasonable diligence the act or omission being grieved was not discovered within 10 working days of its occurrence, and the grievance is subsequently timely filed pursuant to Section IV (3), then the resolution of the grievance may include provision for back pay for a maximum period of one year from the date the grievance was filed. Section 5. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE STEPS. The following procedure shall be followed by an employee submitting a grievance pursuant to policy: Step 1 Discussion with Supervisor. The employee shall discuss his/her grievance with his/her immediate supervisor informally. Within three (3) working days, the supervisor shall give his/her decision to the employee orally. Step 2 Written Grievance to Superior. If the employee and supervisor cannot reach an agreement as to a solution of the grievance or the employee has not received a decision within the three (3) working days' limit, the employee may within seven (7) working days present his/her grievance in writing to his/her supervisor who shall endorse his/her comments thereon and present it to his/her superior within seven (7) working days. The superior shall hear the grievance and give his/her written decision to the employee within seven (7) working days after receiving the grievance. Step 3 Grievance to Department Head. If the employee and superior cannot reach an agreement as to a solution of the grievance or the employee has not received a written decision within the seven (7) working days' limit, the employee may within seven (7) working days present his/her grievance in writing to his/her department head. The department head shall hear the grievance and give his/her written decision to the employee within seven (7) working days after receiving the grievance. Step 4 Grievance to Director and Manager. If the grievance is not settled at the department head level, it may be submitted by WCE's Representative within twenty (20) working days to the Personnel Director, who shall investigate and report his/her findings and recommendations to the city Manager within ten (10) working days. The City Manager shall provide his/her answer within ten (10) additional working days. The times indicated may be extended by mutual agreement. Any Employee grievance will be filed with WCE's Representative at Step 4. Following the submission of the City Manager's answer, and before going to Section 6, Advisory Arbitration, matters which are unresolved shall be discussed at a meeting between the parties during which all pertinent facts and information will be reviewed in an effort to resolve the matter through conciliation. Section 6. ADVISORY ARBITRATION. Any dispute or grievance which has not been resolved by the Grievance Procedure may be submitted to advisory arbitration by WCE's Representative or the City without the consent of the other party providing it is submitted within ten (10) working 'Jß -;¡ç Page 27 ~, '---~---------,------------ days, following its termination in the Grievance Procedure. The following advisory arbitration procedures shall be followed: (1) The requesting party will notify the other party in writing of the matter to be arbitrated and the contract provision(s) allegedly violated. Within five (5) working days of the receipt of this notice, the parties may agree upon an arbitrator, or panel of three arbitrators, trained in conducting grievance hearings. If agreement on an arbitrator cannot be reached, the State Department of Industrial Relations shall be requested by either or both parties to provide a list of five arbitrators. Both the City and WCE shall have the right to strike two names from the list. The party requesting the arbitration shall strike the first name; the other party shall then strike one name. The process will be repeated and the remaining person shall be the arbitrator. (2) The arbitrator shall hear the case within twenty (20) working days after the arbitrator has been selected. The arbitrator may make a written report of their findings to WCE and the City within fifteen (15) working days after the hearing is concluded. The arbitrator shall make rules of procedure. The decision of the arbitrator shall be advisory to the City Manager who shall render a final decision within ten (10) working days. The arbitrator shall have no authority to amend, alter or modify this ligt'eemeat !~iî!!~~t!~r ~~s :~:::;~:~ l;¡~~¡;¡¡da~~:s :~~~ t~::e ~~~r~~a~~~ provision may be extended by mutual agreëÏÏÏënt:. (3) Each grievance or dispute will be submitted to a separately convened arbitration proceeding except when the City and WCE mutually agree to have more than one grievance or dispute submitted to the same arbitrator. (4) The City and WCE shall share the expense of arbitrators and witnesses and shall share equally any other expenses, including those of a stenographer, if required by either party. If either party elects not to follow the advisory decision rendered by the arbitrator, that party shall pay the entire cost of the arbitration process, including the expense of the arbitrator, witnesses and/or stenographer. 3.03 TERM This Memorandum 6f Ufl.àer3tMl.ài.flg shall remain in full force and effect from Jsae 25, 199311~ $)¡~~~!f up to and including 12:00 midnight of jttl) 7-, 1991 (the date closest to July fHiã£is the end of a pay period). This :tgrwRCftt S continue in effect year by year unless one of the parties notifies the other in writing on or e ore May 15, 1994;1 of their desire to negotiate a successor :tgf'cemeflt ..... -.tten proposals for such ended ;Jß -3? Page 28 , 1 - ------------. ----~--_.- - --.----- 3.04 FULL UNDERSTANDING, MODIFICATION, WAIVER A. This Memorandum 5f Ulidel3tftfttliflg sets forth the full and entire understanding of the parties regarding the matters set forth herein. Any other prior or existing understanding or ilgf'ccmclits IIfiI_ll'i)i by the parties, whether formal or informal, regarding such matters are hereby superseded or terminated in their entirety. B. Except as specifically provided herein, it is agreed illl.a understood that WCE voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives its right to meet and confer with respect to any matter covered herein. C. No agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver, or modification of any of the terms or provisions contained herein shall in any way be binding upon the parties hereto unless made and executed in writing by the parties hereto and, if required, approved and implemented by the City Council. D. The waiver of any breach, term, or condition of this Memorandum 5f lh1acrstmàiflg by either party shall constitute a precedent in the future enforcement of all its terms and prOVISIOns. E. Except as specifically provided in this MOUl;~i9!11íqE, it is understood illid ilgf'eea that any benefits and/or working conditions with¡ÏÏthe šcope of representation published in the Civil Service Rules, Salary Ordinance and other resolutions and ordinances that affect benefits and/or working conditions presently in effect and not modified by this MOUI~IB¡¡M!~., shall remain unchanged unless and until the City and WCE meet and confer ¡ÏÏgoodfaith pursuant to the provisions of Section 3504.5 of the Government Code and the City Employer- . Employee Relations Policy concerning any such proposed changes. F. The provisions of paragraph E, above, shall not obligate either party to meet and confer on any issue for the term of this MOUJ~.lq~1 except as provided herein. 3.05 SAVINGS CLAUSE If any article or section of this Memorandum of Uliclerstftfttlia:g shall be held invalid by operation of law or by any tribunal or competent jurisdiction or if compliance with or enforcement of any article or section shall be restrained by such tribunal, the remainder of this ilgf'ccmeftt ~~!i9r¡¡¡j~. shall not be affected thereby. The parties shall if possible meet and confer or meet and consult as the case may be for the purpose of arriving at a mutually satisfactory replacement for such article or section. ~îq9ml.fi~"li' <}!f/J? Page 29 :'; -.-.-------- -----.-------------------- Da.eE,crs Jim. Wfight Depttt, DireetêJr e£ Ptlblie W-ðrks Ol'cratiafis Chief Negetiater Chief Negatiater Westerfi CetiReH ef EHgffiecrs City ef Cluda Yi:Ha Page 30 --------------_._-------------~-------~- W.l; ~C¡ß Since 1970 ( WESTERN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERS Tel.: (510) 934-5408 1812 TRINITY AVENUE, # 302, WALNUT CREEK, CA 945% FAX: (510) 934-4281 ~ :sf :ø June 27, 1995 ~SfI fa '" ""0 (') Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council ~2 !::f fTI v>r- < City of Chula Vista o)Þo Chula Vista, CA -r¡c::: ::ç ", :::pi/> N ¡j Ö Subject: 1994-95 Successor Memorandum of Understanding Negotiations Impasse ,- Honorable Mayor and Council Members: First, I wish to thank each of you for accepting this communication and allowing the designated speaker the opportunity to address the issue before you orally. Health problems has denied me the opportunity to be here today and this I regret. About this time nineteen years ago, I signed the first Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the professional engineers employed by the City. Through the intervening good years as well as the bad, the City, consistent with the spirit and intent of California Government Code Section 3500, never failed to consider fully each presentation made by Western Council, prior to arriving at a determination of policy or course of action. That good faith effort always resulted in agreement. However, this year, the system designed to promote the improvement of employer-employee relations has, thus far, failed Failed, not because the Western Council failed in its obligation to fully consider the needs of the City, but rather because the City failed to fully consider the needs and concerns of our membership. Failure to reach agreement was not so much a reflection of the magnitude of the CUlTent fiscal condition of the City, but rather because collaboration and reason was replaced by power, based on coercion and threat. Failed because the City's inflexibility and impersonality in human relations failed to consider the existing commonality of organizational goals and individual needs, which is, in fact, the key to organizational effectiveness and efficiency. The above argument is supported by the following: 1. We were told, and we accepted, the fact that there was no money for wage adjustments. Yet the City "found" money to adjust wages for some, seemingly in spite of "supply and demand" considerations ( PERS "pick-up" is by case law wages, not fringe benefit). This action kindles fears and prejudices, and puts in harms way needed positive attitudes and trusting relationships for the future. 2. As you are aware, we supported the proposal to modify the PERS contract to include the "2 @ 55" formula. That support was, of course, conditional on total agreement. We argue the 2 @ 55 option cost will be partially offset by earlier retirement by some which will permit the City to hold open vacated positions or fill with new hires at a lower overall cost to the City. Even though we have thus far failed to reach agreement, implementing the option still has our support. Promoting e=ellence in engineering achievement thru the individual engineer 9!J -.71 ,-" However, how to pay for the option was subject to good faith negotiations. We very early requested to be a part of those negotiations. We had that right under law. Even so, this we were denied. Without given full, or any, consideration to our proposals on the issue of paying for the option, the City reached agreement with CVEA and then "imposed" those conditions on the Western Council members "word for word" with the implied threat "take it or leave it". The need for collaboration and reason was therefore ignored. 3. If the above alone leaves doubt as to whether or not the City negotiated in "good faith". then one must consider the fact that the full agreement negotiated by another organization was "imposed" on Western Council members. 4. On June 5th, the City requested we take back to our members the "imposed" tentative agreement with the understanding that even though we ratify and CVFA failed to ratify, the CVEA action would nullify our acceptance. CVEA had no such condition placed on their decision. This demonstrated a total lack of concern for the need for humanistic and democratic values in the process. Quantity and quality of product and service is dependent on the performance of the engineer which, in turn, is dependent on the degree to which personal needs are fulfilled, individually and collectively. To ignore these needs will not best serve the mandate of people of Chula Vista to accomplish the mission in the most effective and efficient manner. On June 5th an impasse meeting was held with the City Manager. At that meeting, we aired our grievance. We believe he understood and gave full consideration to our concerns. In addition, in our opinion, he did what he could to resolve the issues. However, and unfortunately, his efforts in a one hour meeting could not erase the one year of accumulated disappointment with the process. At this juncture we wish to make it clear that the engineers have no reservations about paying their fair share for the 2 @ 55 option. They do believe there is more than one way to do it. Not knowing what the state of the economy will be during the third and fourth years of the City imposed contract duration, we are willing to agree to the City proposal, as proposed, for the first two years and request the opportunity to re-enter the negotiating process, in a meaningfully w<\y. during the spring of 1996 for the purpose of reaching agreement on the remaining two years. By accepting this proposal the City has nothing to lose, but will go a long way toward rekindling the trusting relationship we have enjoyed for so many years. The engineers employed by the City are more educated and better trained than ever before, and they have every intent to continue to meet and/or exceed the expectations of the people of Chula Vista. From this group will emerge a great many of tomorrows managers. It is important the working environment for these professionals be designed to encourage and motivate these individuals to accept the responsibility for the effective and efficient execution of the City's mission. I believe you have sufficient insight into the situation such that you will not abdicate from your role of responsibility to these City employed professionals, individually and collectively, and I hope those values will be reflected in Council action today. Respectfully Submitted, ~~~~ J es L. Wright, Execu . . tor c. John D. Goss, City Manager 9!J /'tJ :" COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM 9C MEETING DATE 6/27/95 ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION 177r1pprOving the MOU concerning wages and other terms and conditions of employment with the Chula Vista Employees Association for FY 1994/95 through FY 1997/98. SUBMITTED BY: DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL r:ß- REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER Ç}"- (4/5th Vote: Yes- No_X..! Negotiating teams representing the City and the Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) have reached agreement on a Memorandum of Understand (MOU) covering FY 1994/95 through FY 1997/98. The proposed MOU was ratified by CVEA members on June 16th. The major terms and conditions of the proposed MOU are highlighted below. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving the MOU with CVEA. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION' N/A DISCUSSION: The FY 94/95 through FY 97/98 MOU with CVEA includes the following major provisions/changes: FY 1994/95 1. SIDE LETTER .. The special adjustment letter of understanding shall be implemented effective July 8, 1994. 2. ADVISORY COMMITTEE - The CVEA/Management Classification Review Advisory Committee shall be convened. 3. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE .. Added to allowable categories of leave for the purpose of bereavement are vacation, comp time and floating holiday hours. 9C-j 4. P.E.R.S. - The PERS contact will be amended to provide the 2% @ 55 retirement benefit to local miscellaneous members after final reading and adoption. FY 1995/96 1. STIPEND - A one time, pre-tax stipend of $200 for each employee represented by CVEA will be paid the first pay period in December, 1995. 2. WORK FURLOUGH - Employees represented by CVEA have agreed to a 40 hour per year, unpaid work furlough. The furlough will be effected during the otherwise normal work week between the hard holidays of December 25th and January 1 st. (In the event that the subject work week consists of fewer than five days, the additional work furlough days will be added, on a non-paid basis, to an appropriate unpaid leave balance.) In classifications where staffing of positions will be necessary (as determined by the City Manager) during the subject work week, the affected employees shall be credited the number of furlough hours worked. FY 1996/97 1. STIPEND - A one time, pre-tax stipend of $325 will be paid to each employee represented by CVEA the first pay period in December, 1996. 2. DEFERRED COMPENSATION - The maximum allowable contribution will be increased from 20% to 25%. FY 1997/98 1. SALARY SURVEY - In October, 1997. the City will conduct a survey of specified jurisdictions to determine the average base wage adjustment contracted for and affecting the general employees of those jurisdictions in FY 1997/98. CVEA represented employees shall receive a base wage adjustment equal to the average of the base wage adjustment granted to the general employees in the survey jurisdictions. The base wage adjustment shall not exceed 4%. In addition to the formal MOU, two additional agreements were reached with CVEA. 1. CVEA agreed to commence meet and confer on the Communications Operator work schedule and related issues. The process will take place between June 9, 1995 and July 21. 1995. Any agreements reached in this process will be included in the Memorandum of Understanding or a side letter thereto. 9C-.;L ,-- FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of this Memorandum of Understanding is within the guidelines established by the City Council. The cost of 2 % at 55 during the term of the agreement, net of the savings associated with the five (5) day furlough, is a savings of $19,816. A potential major cost is the survey that will be conducted in Year 4. The City has agreed to provide a wage increase equal to the average of the increases given by all the cities surveyed, however, in no case shall an increase of more than 4 % be granted. Other components of the Memorandum of Understanding, and their associated costs. are as follows: . Year 2: a $200 per employee stipend costing a total of $77,000 . Year 3: a $325 per employee stipend costing a total of $125,125 . Year 4: a general salary increase between $0 and $508,077 depending upon the results of the survey. Total costs over the term of this Memorandum of Understanding could range from $184,309 to $692,386 based primarily on the results of the survey. 'Jc.- J lie-if RESOLUTION NO. J 79~ø2. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING WAGES AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT WITH THE CHULA VISTA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CVEA) FOR FISCAL YEARS 1994/95 THROUGH 1997/98 AND APPROVING THE ACCOMPANYING SIDE LETTERS OF UNDERSTANDING WHEREAS, the Management Negotiation Team representing the City Manager of the City of Chula Vista, acting for and on behalf of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, have heretofore met and conferred with the Chula vista Employees Association (CVEA) , an organization representing various employee classifications throughout the city, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3500 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the Memorandum of Understanding jointly prepared by said parties as a result of meeting and conferring in good faith has been presented to the City Council and is on file in the office of the City Clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Wages and Other Terms and Conditions of Employment with the Chula vista Employees Association and accompanying side Letters of Understanding for Fiscal Years 1994/95 through 1997/98, copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ WhJ.-t AJ) t1 ~~.t:g~~~y Candy Emerson, Director of Personnel Attorney c: \rs\CVEA.MOU '/c-.? /CCt-b I ,I I Page I Item It? COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT TITLE: Resolution /79'13 amending agreement No- 11-4239 between the State of California Department of Transportation and the City extending the termination date and budget through FY '95-96 for the Telecenter Project; extending lease agreement on a monthly basis for the R Street Telecenter and appropriating $20,000 for same- SUBMITfED BY: B,""u. B=b"",. E.~m=m~" M_'~<f'::, REVIEWED BY: John D. Goss, City Manage~ --?" (4/5th Vote: Yes~ No--> In April 1994, the City Council approved the development of two Telecenters, funded through various grants. The first telecenter opened in August 1994, the downtown telecenter in December 1994. This action establishes support for the telecenter project's second year of operation, provides an extension of an existing lease agreement on a month to month basis for the R Street Telecenter, approves a carryover of the $26,000 appropriation from the city's existing grants to be carried over to FY 95-96 for the Telecenters project, and appropriating an additional $20,000 of estimated rental revenues. . RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolution. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS: nla DISCUSSION: Since the first telecenter opened at East "R" Street, the City has been part of a state-wide study on the impact telecenters have on trip reduction- The primary goal of establishing a telecenter program is to enable residents to work out of the telecenter one to four days per week. The telecenters serve the city's highest concentration of "information workers" - those residents who can work at their current job at a site closer to home through the use of telecommunications equipment (i.e. computers, modems, and telephones) to stay in touch with their office. A secondary goal is to develop partnerships that will assist in the goal of reducing or eliminating vehicle trips by using the telecenters for a variety of purposes, such as distance learning, telemedicine, videoconferencing, etc... Finally the Telecenters provide economic development opportunities by retaining residents in the community -- capturing shopping, restaurant and retail dollars otherwise spent outside the City. reducing travel, and freeing up local infrastructure resource demands. Currently, the City's telecenters are used statewide as a model for the development of telecenters- The East "R" Street telecenter has an occupancy rate of 42% and the downtown telecenter, open only 6 months, has an occupancy rate of 27%, a full time renter, and income J~-I 1"-" [ " (, Page 2 Item /0 generation of over $2,000 per month. Regarding the renter, University of Phoenix has an ongoing agreement with the Telecenter; the University rents private office space and additionally holds regular evening classes in both the classroom and the conference room. Staff has produced a telecenter marketing and business plan, which outlines the following: the telecenters shall be operational for three years prior to becoming self - sufficient. After the third year, numerous partnerships should be developed which will bring a combination of grant funds and additional revenue to turn the telecenter into a profitable venture. As of June 1995, during its first year of operation, the telecenters have generated over $10,000 in revenue, are projected to continue generating over $2,000 per month, and have provided the State with trip reduction documentation- The Citizen's Telecenter Task Force established milestones to measure the ongoing effectiveness and success of the telecenters. These milestones include: increasing occupancy rate for the East "R" Street Telecenter to 75% by June 1996, and 50% by January 1996 for the downtown telecenter; increasing revenue to $5,000 per month by the end of year 2, establishing three major partnerships by the end of year two. At the end of the second year, staff will use these milestones to compare with occupancy rates and revenues- Based upon this information, staff will provide recommendations to the Council on the continuation of the telecenter project. Staff is requesting approval for extension of an existing Caltrans grant. This extension provides for rollover of funds already budgeted in FY 94-95 to the next fiscal year and continues the City's scope of work regarding partnership development for the Telecenter. Per the contract, attachment 2, the City will continue marketing and promoting the two telecenters, with a special emphasis on the downtown telecenter, continue to evaluate the success of the telecenters and proceed with developing partnerships to utilize the telecenter's off-commuting hours and produce new sources of revenue, with the goal of making the telecenters self sufficient. The City has received an additional $80,000 in grants for the telecenters project from the California Energy Commission. These funds will not be available to the City until late summer. In the interim, staff is requesting appropriation of funds for operation of the R Street telecenter generated directly from telecenter revenue. Once the City approves the contract with the California Energy Commission, expected to arrive August 1995, operation expenditures will revert back to the grant. As such, staff anticipates using only the minimum required revenues in order to continue operating the East R Street site while the grant contract is negotiated- Staff is also requesting extension of the East R Street lease agreement, the terms of which were approved by the City Council in June 1996 with Kelton Title Corporation. This lease agreement will revert to a month to month lease, with identical terms to the City's current lease, until the new grant contracts have been approved by Council. At that time, we will re- establish the one year lease agreement with Kelton Title Corporation. Lease costs are $1,600 per month @ $1.14 per square foot. Kelton Title Corporation has provided the City with a /tJ -.;2- P9 Page 3 Item If} rate reduction of $.76 per square foot. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact to the general fund. The Council will be taking action on three separate items. These include (I) extending existing Caltrans contract: Extending the Caltrans contract in department 280-2806 provides for a rollover of appropriated funds, approximately $26,500, into FY 95-96- (2) extending the lease agreement for 1550 E H Street: The current lease agreement expires on June 30th, 1995- Extension of the lease agreement will result in a $1,600 monthly expenditure- The City has the perogative to end the lease with a 30 day notice, if necessary. Initially, these funds will be appropriated from telecenter rental revenue, when the California Energy Commission grant contract is provided to the city, expenditures will be shifted to the grant funds. (3) appropriate $20,000 from generated rental revenues to account 280-2821 for operation expenditures. See attachment 1. Attachments: Attachment I - Budget for 280-2821 Expenditures Attachment 2 - Caltrans Contract Extension Attachment 3 - Kelton Title Corporation H Street Lease Agreement 1&-3/6-1 I r.ì I') i. RESOLUTION NO. J'l9'1:J - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING AGREEMENT NO. 11-4239 BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY EXTENDING THE TERMINATION DATE AND BUDGET THROUGH FY 1995-96 FOR THE TELECENTER PROJECT; EXTENDING LEASE AGREEMENT ON A MONTHLY BASIS FOR THE H STREET TELECENTER AND APPROPRIATING $20,000 FOR SAME WHEREAS, in April 1994, the city Council approve the development of two Telecenters, funded through various grants; and WHEREAS, the first telecen~er opened in August 1994, the downtown telecenter in December 1994; and WHEREAS, staff recommends Council support the telecenter project's second year of operation, provide an extension of an existing lease agreement on a month to month basis for the H Street Telecenter, approve a carryover of the $26,000 appropriation from the city's existing grants to be carried over to FY 1995-96 for the Telecenter project and appropriate additional funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby amend Agreement No. 11-4239 between the State of California Department of Transportation and the City extending the termination date and budget through 1995-96 for the Telecenter Project, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No.----- (to be completed by the City Clerk in the final document). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chula vista does hereby extend the lease agreement for l550 East H Street between the City and Bollenbacher & Kelton, Inc. on a month to month basis as set forth in their letter agreement dated June 7, 1995. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $20,000 of estimated rental revenues is hereby appropriated to Energy Conservation Fund Account 280-2821 for rental and operation of the telecenters as set forth in Attachment 1. Presented by Approved as to form by Barbara Bamberger, Environmental Bruce M. Boogaard, City Resources Manager Attorney c: \ rs\teletr2 /¿J~f )CJ -~ ! ATTACHMENT 1 Energy Conservation Fund 280-2821 Account Description Budget 5271 Rentals and Leases $7,000 5251 Utilities $3,000 5252 Telephone $3,000 5398 Other commodities $4,000 5301 Office Supplies $1,000 5231 Insurance $2,000 TOTAL $20,000 )6J ,--? -/- _.-Om- ATTACHMENT 2 11-SD-VAR P. M. VAR EA 995196-3TEL3-114239 Agreement No. 11-4239!A1 Telecenter Study AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON , is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to herein as CITY. RECITALS 1. The parties hereto entered into an Agreement District Number 11-4239 (Document No. 9459) on June 30, 1994, said Agreement defining the terms and conditions of a project for preparation of a study for a telebusiness work center, referred to herein as PROJECT. 2. It has been determined that PROJECT will not be completed prior to the termination date of said Agreement. IT IS THEREFORE MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. The termination date specified in Section III, Article 9, of the original Agreement, shall now be June 30,1996, instead of June 30, 1995. 2. The other terms and conditions of said Agreement 11-4239 (Document 9459) shall remain in full force and effect. I(}~g/ -;l - ~ -' - ~ 11-4239/A1 3. This Amendment to Agreement 11-4239 is hereby deemed to be part of Document 9459. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: By: Deputy District Director Certified as to funds District Resource Manager Approved as to form Approved as to form and procedure and procedure Attorney Department of Transportation - Certified as to Procedure Accounting Administrator 2 / ¿;:J---i -J- ,,)1 !. ,,) ---. --- ---.. -------------- ------- 11-SD-VAR P.M. VAR EA 995196-3TEL3-114239 Agreement No. 11-4239 Telecenter Study COOPERATZVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON Q U-/fI..L 9C~ rff1, is between the STATE OF CALIFORL'1IA, acting byV and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and CITY OF Chula Vista, a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to herein as CITY. RECITALS 1. STATE and CITY pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Sections 114 and 130, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways within the CITY. 2. STATE wishes to have a regional Traffic Demand management (TDM) program which includes, but is not limited to, development of TDM research and the evaluation of new technologies such as telebusiness work centers and their potential to impact transportation mode shifts. This Agreement addresses the use of residential area-based telebusiness work centers. Marketing, business plan development and feasibility assessment must be performed as first step. This work is henceforth referred to herein as , STUDY' . 3. CITY is willing and able to perform STUDY and STATE is agreeable to this. 4. Subsequent phases in the developm~t of a telebusiness work center in the City of Chula Vista, including Implementation and Evaluation could be the subject of one or more future Agreements. 5. STATE and CITY provide benefits to the public by alleviating trips and traffic congestion in the San Diego County metropolitan area, thereby mitigating the negative impacts on air quality, travel time and energy consumption associated with such congestion. Doc. No. 9459 /0-/0 -1- '-, ------------- ---- ---,- ----~~~-- 11-4239 6. The funding source under this Agreement for STUDY is the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act ISTEA) 23 USC SEC. 146. 7. STATE and CITY mutually desire to cooperate and jointly participate in STUDY and desire to specify herein the terms and conditions under which the STUDY is to conducted, financed, and administered. SECTION I CITY AGREES: 1. To carry out the Work Plan for STUDY as specified in Attachment 1 of this Agreement. 2. To provide, from local, non-federal sources, at least twelve percent (l2%) of the total STATE contribution as matching funds in support of STUDY. 3. To begin the work described in Attachment 1 of this Agreement July 1, 19~or ~pon execution of this Agreement. ~Mi ¡;ìH,"er iCi later. G!v 4. To submit an initial billing for STUDY expenditures described in Attachment 1 of this Agreement within thirty (30) days of execution of this Agreement. 5. To be solely responsible for all travel costs associated with STUDY. 6. To provide STATE monthly reports of actual expenditures for comparison against the advance payment. 7. To provide STATE with monthly written reports beginning August 1, 1994, or one month after work begins, describing the results of activities undertaken pursuant to the approved Work Plan for STUDY. 8. To meet informally with STATE at lèast bi-monthly in order to monitor progress of STUDY. 9. To account for all costs of STUDY to be paid by STATE pursuant to this Agreement. 10. To retain or cause to be retained for audit by STATE or other government auditors for a period of three (3) years from date of final payment, all records and accounts relating to STUDY. 2 Doc. No. 9459 )¿) ---II -5"- '0 --------~----~_._--_._~- ~ - _._---------~- -------- ------------ 11-4239 11. To return any unused portion of STATE's deposit upon completion of work, within 30 days after expiration of this Agreement or within 30 days after termination of this Agreement. SECTION II STATE AGREES: 1. To deposit with CITY within twenty-five (25) days of receipt of initial billing an amount not to exceed $50,000 to support the activities described in Attachment 1 of this Agreement. 2. To work with CITY to assure that required State and Federal laws and regulations are followed. 3. To provide prompt reviews and approvals, as appropriate, of submittals by CITY and to cooperate in timely processing of STUDY. SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) , the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California Transportation Commission. 2. STATE shall designate a Contract Manager and CITY shall designate a representative through whom all communications between the two agencies shall be channeled. The initial STATE Contract Manager is MICHELE FELL-CASALE and the initial CITY representative is BARBARA BAMBERGER. 3. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liabiliDY occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. 3 Doc. No. 9459 /(J- /2 -t - ---------------- - --------------- ----- -- ---- ----------------------- 11-4239 4. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Codes Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. 5. Ownership, title or copyright of all product(s) of STUDY including but not limited to, reports, studies, and software developed for STUDY; will automatically be vested in STATE and no further agreement will be necessary to transfer ownership to STATE. 6. To affix the statement and disclaimer in Attachment 2 to all products of STUDY as described in the Article above. 7. provisions contained herein may be altered, changed, or amended by mutual written consent of the parties hereto. No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 8. All Attachments referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated and made part of this Agreement. . 4 Dec. No. 9459 /(fJ---(J -?- ~. ~-----" ---"--------- -----------~-----------"- --- 11-4239 9. This Agreement shall terminate upon completion of STUDY by CITY, or on JUNE 30, 1995, whichever is earlier in time, unless all parties agree to an extension of time. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: &~~ By: ...,r::;::- /l ~ A... - Deputy District Director Approved as to form Approved as to form and procedure and Procedure Y~~~¿L ~ Certified as to funds and procedure: 5 Doc. No. 9459 J(!) -Ii ~8"- --~ -------"----- ----"------------------------------- - ----~-- ATTACHMENT I City of ChuJa Vista T~~ect I. BACKGROUND The City of Chula Vista has developed a proposal to operate two Neighborhood Telecenters in Chula Vista. The goals of the Chula Vista telecenters include: A) serving as a pilot that will supply evaluation criteria to those interested in developing telecenters. B) monitoring and evaluating activities at the center for their transportation, air quality and energy reduction impacts. Exploring the potential of utilizing telecenters as a land use measure relating to mode-shift, trip reduction, air quality reduction measures, and congestion management. C) assisting businesses in their compliance efforts to reduce vehicle trips while maintaining a professional alternative environment for workers to telecommute. D) Reducing vehicle trips by replacing them with the movement of information through state-of-the-art telecommunications technology (for example, video conference, fiber optics, teleshopping, etc) II. GENERAL APPROACH The Neighborhood Telecenter is proposed to be used by both public and private entities, with the greater emphasis on recruiting employees from private businesses. Telecenters allow for the partial substitution of computers or telecommunication technologies in place of a typical commute to work by employees. The Telecenter will also contribute to reducing employee commute trips which will help businesses comply with oncoming air quality regulations, help reduce pollution from automobiles, improve jobs/housing balance, result in an approximate 12% improvement in worker productivity (according to Caltrans figures), allow employees to work closer to home, and result in cost savings for the employer from avoided transit subsidies. The goal of this project is to reduce 44 daily vehicle trips through use of the telecenter by the end of the contract period. The ultimate number of trips reduced is based on the capacity of the center and the variety of users it attracts. The first telecenter will open by August I, 1994 with 10 workstations and with a telecommuter occupancy of 25%. The second telecenter will open in the fall of 1994 with 10 workstations, for a total of 20 workstations, and the second telecenter will offer conference room facilities equipped with state-of-the art telecommunications equipment that will potentially be linked to other parts of California and to Mexico via satellite. We will develop partnerships for evening uses of the workstations and the conference room, through distance learning, computer courses, etc. We will market the telecenters to employees and to off-peak hour uses, all those uses having the intended purpose of reducing trips and turning the telecenter into a self-sufficient operation. In order to maintain high occupancy I Doc. No. 9459 /tJ~/5 - 9 '- I ,\ -~_. .._-_.._-_._-----_._--~----------------- ------------------- -~- rate, a variety of partnerships will be sought. During the first two years of operation, the telecenter will seek added services to be available to the public and, at the same time reduce trips. These uses include, but are not limited to distance learning, teleshopping, telemedicine, video conferencing, and night classes. At maximum occupancy during year two, the goal is to reduce vehicle trips by 44 trips per day. It is expected that the telecenter can initially reduce vehicle trips by 10-44 trips per day for the first year. IV. SECURITY The City has developed an Education Technology Task Force to identify the technological needs and security concerns associated with the telecenters. The City plans to take the highest level of precaution to protect not only the computer equipment but also the privacy of those businesses patronizing the telecenter. Security is of utmost concern and will be addressed within the planning process for both telecenter sites. During off-peak hours, there will be a code system to enter the building and the computers and telephones will be coded as well. ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- I. CONCEPT AND OBJECTIVES THE CONCEPT The primary goal of establishing a telecenter program is to enable residents to work out of the telecenter one to five days per week. The City will develop two telecenters, both serving the city's highest concentration of "information workers" - those residents who can work at their current job at a site closer to home by using telecommunications equipment such as computers, modems and telephones to stay in touch with their offices. The telecenters will accommodate most computer hardware and software and allow individual commuters from Chula Vista and the local area to telecommute from a centrally located facility, thereby reducing the number of vehicles, the number of trips generated and promotes mode shift and congestion reduction on the region's highway and road infrastructure. A secondary goal is to develop partnerships that will assist in the goal of reducing and/or eliminating vehicle trips by using the telecenters for a variety of purposes at off- commuting hours. The City plans to establish the feasibility for state-of-the-art telecenter partnerships, such as telemedicine, video-conferencing into Mexico, teleshopping, distance learning, distance learning, and other uses that can occur in the telecenter, instead of driving long-distances and across the border. Finally, the Telecenter will assist in the economic development of the Chula Vista community by locating two telecommuting centers convenient to shops, restaurants and other public establishments creating work opportunities close to housing, capturing home and work shopping, reducing travel, and freeing-up local infrastructure resource demands. 2 Doc. No. 9459 /t)~/ ~ --It} , -I i ------------- ----- ------------------------------- ------------ ----------~------ OBTECTIVES The following objectives are proposed based on implementation of ¡ill phases of the project: 1. The TeleCenters will be operational within nine (9) months of initiation of the proJect. 2. A 25% occupancy rate of the first telecenter with 10 workstations will be achieved by opening day, increasing to 50% by November 1, 1994; a 25% occupancy of the second telecenter with 10 workstations will be achieved upon opening of the telecenter, which will occur by December 1994; the occupancy rate increasing to 50% six months after opening. 3. The TeleCenters, when both are fully operational, will eliminate approximately 880 commute trips per month from the Chula Vista area. 4. The TeleCenters will meet the needs of its participants by providing computer facilities, office equipment, services to enable users to work out of the telecenter. 5. Identify if there's a market for transportation "replacement" services ~.e. partnership development) to a) reduce cross-border transportation impacts b) help meet the goal of reducing regional trips and b) enable the telecenter to become self-sufficient. 6. Identify the feasibility of turning telecenters over to the private sector as a concession once the telecenters are up-and-running. ll. PHASING DESCRIPTION The Chula Vista TeleCenters project is requesting funding for Phase I & II of a three phased program: Phase I - Business/Marketing Plan development and Employee Recruitment Planning, Phase II - Implementation, Operational Evaluation and Plan Update. 1lI. ACTIVITIES PHASE I: Business/Marketing Plan Development ànd Employee Recruitment Planning ACTIVITY PERIOD: MONTH 1 - 3 This proposal outlines activities for Phase I of the Chula Vista Telecenters which consists of conducting comprehensive marketing, promotions, site and design, and partnership development. 3 Doc. Nc. 9459 /tJ-/7 -11- _!- -~------_._.._--_.. - -_.._-----~----_._--_._----- . ---_.._---------~---- Proposed Tasks: 1. Select Subcontractor City will conduct a selection process to obtain a qualified subcontractor(s) to conduct activities in Tasks 2 - 7. City will work with Site Designer to implement Product: Agreement with subcontractor to conduct marketing/promotional tasks, and to begin development of partnerships. Activity Period: Month I 2. Conduct Marlœting Analysis Utilizing available and relevant information, task will include: 0 review of regional air quality employer trip reduction mandates. 0 Refine existing business and marketing plan to include section on partnerships. 0 employee and employer participation recruitment. 0 Conduct study on the feasibility of a) concessionairing the teleceniers to the private sector, b) the use of new technologies for potential new partnership to pursue 0 Prepare feasibility analysis and partnership report for presentation to City and CalTrans. Product: Addendum to business plan/marketing plan and report on partnership development, specifically on which have the potential for success and how those partnerships will be pursued. Activity Period: Months 1 -3. 3. Conduct MarlœtingIR~tional Activities . A marketing strategy will be launched to attract potential employer and employee users and will, at a minimum, consist of the following: 0 Develop quality brochures and information materials explaining the concept, purpose and benefits of the project targeted to the needs and interest of the market(s) identified in Task 2. 0 Announce the telecenter through press releases to major and regional 4- Joe. No. 9459 /O~/g/ -/..2- /,- ____om_.____--------- - -_0____0__.___.------------------------------ newspapers, publications, voice and video media. 0 Conduct a direct mail solicitation to residents within a 3 mile radius of the telecenters and identify employers/agencies with telephone and face- to-face follow up. No less than 6,000 prospective employees and 50 prospective employer/agencies will be identified and contacted. 0 Meet with both potential employers and professional groups to explain the proposed program and identify interests and requirements. 0 Secure Participation Agreements from employers. Product: Promotional materials, revised marketing plan, letters of intent. Activity Period: I - 6 4. Business and Operating Plan Further develop and implement the initial Business Plan to incorporate the following: 0 Identify most likely partnerships and other revenue generating services. 0 Project start-up and promotional costs for each partnership and service. 0 Project first year operational costs and revenues for centers, including partnerships and services. Product: Business Plan, feasibility study results Activity Period: Month 3 . 6 5. Reporting Reports will be prepared and delivered to funding agencies including Marketing Analysis tasks and Business Plan. Product: Reports provided in multiple copies and on word processing computer disk. . Activity Period: Month 3 and 6. END OF WORK TASKS IN PHASE I 5 Doc. No. 9459 )1).---/1 -/ J ---- --------"----0___--"_-"--- - - ----------------- - ---------""--------- IV. BUDGET The anticipated budget requirement for Phase I of the Chula Vista TeleCenter is detailed below. CHULA VISTA TELECENTER PHASE I & II PROPOSED BUDGET CATEGORY /ITEM # UNITS EST. FUNDING FUNDING PROJECT UNIT MATCH REQUEST TOTAL COST CONTRACT SERVICES Feasibility 300 hrs 70.00 21,000 21,000 Study /Partnership Development Marketing/Promotion 140 hrs 70.00 39,900 9,800 49,700 Recruitment Addendum to deliverable 0 30,000 0 30,000 Business/Marketing Plan of marketing efforts Site Planning/Design 30,000 11,700 41,700 Reporting/Preparation 40 70.00 2,800 2,BOO OTHER COSTS Printing/Reproduction 8,000 2,000 10,000 Telecommunications 20,000 500 20,500 Postage 4,000 1,700 5,700 Travel Reimbursement (4) 750 750 Misc. Reimbursable (5) 500 500 GRAND TOTAL 132,650 50,000 182,650 6 Doc. No. 9459 J () ~,)-O -It(' ----------- ----------- -- - --------- - - ----- -- --------------~------- ATTACHMENT 2- Documents or written reports prepared under this Agreement shall contain the following statement: This report (document) was prepared through grants from the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration with the cooperation of the State of California, Department of Transportation. Documents or written reports prepared under this Agreement shall also contain the following disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the da ta presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. Doc. No. 9459 It) /02 / -/5"~ -~~--~--- ---------_._----~ ~----- -- --------------- RESOLUTION NO.1 7538 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CITY ACCEPTANCE OF $50,000 FEDERAL INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT (lSTEA) "PASS THROUGH" MONEYS FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE CHULA VISTA TELECENTER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACT WITH CAL TRANS, ESTABLISHING THE TERMS OF SUCH AGREEMENT IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY AND THE CITY MANAGER, AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO APPROPRIATE $50,000 TO THE APPROPRIATE ACCOUNTS AS NEEDED WHEREAS, as part of the City's overall effort toward development of a comprehensive energy conservation and air quality improvement program, and consistent with the City's Environmental Agenda, the City applied for funding from the State of California Department of Transportation (CaITransl; and, WHEREAS. CalTrans and the City pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Sections 114 and 130. are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways within the San Diego County metropolitan area; and, WHEREAS, the CalTrans wishes to have a regional Traffic Demand management program which includes the research and the evaluation of new technologies such as telebusiness work centers and their potential to impact transportation mode shifts; and, WHEREAS, up to $50,000 in federallntermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (lSTEA) "pass through" monies from CalTrans will be given to the City of Chula Vista to assist in the development of the Chula Vista Telecenters; and. WHEREAS. the City will receive a total, not to exceed $50,000 to implement the Chula Vista Telecenter Project; and, WHEREAS. the Agreement between the C.ity and CalTrans will address the use of residential area-based telebusiness work centers and development of partnerships therein; and. WHEREAS. marketing. business plan development and feasibility assessment must be performed as a first step toward implementation of the Telecenters; WHEREAS, in order to proceed with a contract between the City and CalTrans, CalTrans requires a resolution which authorizes the Mayor to proceed with contract negotiations. in accordance with the CalTrans ISTEA Funding guidelines- Doc. No. 9459 /{9~c2;L -It' ..~------- - ----------------'--- --------.---------------- ----~-----~---- Resolution No. 17538 Page 2 NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby authorize the Mayor to execute a contract with CalTrans establishing the terms of such an Agreement in a form acceptable to and approved by the City Attorney and the City Manager. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is hereby authorized to appropriate $50.000 to a newly established activity account within the Energy Conservation Fund. earmarked Telecenter II. Account 280.2806. Presented by ~~_l Barbara Bamberger Environmental Resource Manager Doc. No. 9459 / ¡) -- cJ.- 'J -/7- -------_.__._.._~- ------------------------- Resolution No. 17538 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista. California, this 21 st day of June. 1994, by the following vote: YES: Councilmembers: Fox. Horton. Moore, Rindone NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Nader ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None ATTEST: ~ () r2:d Cd Beverly. Authelet, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I, Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 17538 was duly passed. approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 21 st day of June. 1994. Executed this 21st day of June. 1994. ~~ rJ ()m/.þJ£ Beverly. Authelet, City Clerk THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IS A CORRECT COpy OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE S OFFICE. A ST: BE E Y.A, Doc. No. 9459 BY: /()--;21 _/ð'r -) .ZIIIBI~ a ... CO..~RDcrIO. .~I.I~ CIIb IoancUord hereby agr.e., axcepting for cau.e. beyond landlord'. control, to erect the building depicted in Exhibit ".", a portion of which approxiaat81y 1,400 .q. ft. .hall be 1a..ed to the under.i9JIed ~enant. .aid con.truction .hell be COlI leted in accordance with Exhibit 'c' hereto attached. "".4141'., hI' UU" lIa~ If. t-. 1'81811 allh .~I.~--l, i. -..&1. L~ ,,-U._- r--iau h w....... hiLt. .. a."~ fa..o .U.L~. af tot.. .lIan"'a.. .f ~ia Laa.., 1Ihta ¡u.. .~al1 L - L .~U .1....5 ~f ..~ ? hutt.n far.. ... aU..,.. Any additional change, 8Odification or alteration not contained in Exhibit .c' 8hall be at the .ole co.t and expen.e of Tenant. .' '!'he '1'anant a91'ee. that upon the -pletion ot the .rection of said buildill9 .1Ib.tantiall~ in accordance vith the plan. and .pecification. therefor IIan upon tbe delivery of .......,.. ~ ~'. ... ~"' riU ~~. M""~ b - ~ condition which it may then be. a... jet u ., ~ .L,~.. n .ld.. ~~~L~':': ~~~m~.~e""fa~L.~~~.::W:~L~,L~~.:~;::l~~~:~:~ .Ii \!I.__~lL, "'L ta,.. aaa..... WI...... ... 1II<a a",L,a.," lIka...f. H ~enant 8hall tbereafter save and bold barala.. the Landlord trOll liability a. provided in thia Ioaa.e. '!'he fact that the '1'anant aay anter into po..a..ion prior to the actual completion ot the buildill9 for the purpo.e of in.talling fixture. and equipllent .hall not be de_ed an acceptance by the Tenant of _pletion by the landlord until actual -pletion .hall bave taken place, but in .uch event Tenant llball bold Ioandlord barml... and indemnity Ioandlord for any 10.. or -ge to ~enant.. fixture., .quipllent and ..rchandiae and for injury to any per.on., unle.. .Ule be cau.ed by the active negligence of landlord or it. agent.. Upon actual _pletion ot the iaprov-ant. to be cOllplet.d by Ioandlord in the building, the landlord a91'ee. to ~ record e lIotice ot COIIpletion in the office of the County aecorder. July 18, 1994, or '!'he tan of thia Lea.e shall _ance on the day on which landlord deliver. the d_i.ed Pr_iae. to Tenant, p 0 all of the landlord'. work i. Í581ayed by ~enant'. failure to complete the nece..ary work, Ioandlord "y fil. a lIotice ot ce...tion ot Work or a Notice of CoIIIpletion on the portion of landlord'. vork actually completed, and the filing of either of .ucb notice. 8hall be equivalent to the filing of e valid 1I0tice of Completion. If the ten _ence. on a day other than the fir.t day of a calandar month, the toen of th1a '..a.e aball be iT. atfact for the ..a11:i..l month anc! until the tenination date aet forth in the Ioaa.e. &1.0 in that event, nnt for the r:rtial month 8hall be prorated on the beai. of the aonthly ain wa rant. lIben the _en..-nt date i. detenined, the pertie. aball _acute a certificata of tha date of -_ant. aar 111' to occur. .See R1ðer II. CITY OF CIIUIA VISTA aLTON 'J'I'1'LI: CORPORATION By: G/£Jr!;1- By'~, /. 'J'l!:llAII'I' .. e on DLORD Vice Praa1dent It.. q--W~?- ~ J ¡}"'< ¿, -;2ð -- --------'--- I ----~--- ----- --- ---------------------,----- --" -~--------- ----------- , amu....n '!'he Landlord hereby a'lreee, axcapUn'l for cauee. beyond Landlord'. rea.onable control, to phya1cally complete the work de.cribed in Exhibit .C., Article I., .oe.cription of LancUorcS'. Work., no later than July 18, 1994, provicSecS the following evente occur within the re.pective period. .tatecS below: 1. '!'h18 lA..e A'lr.e.ent 18 fully .xecutecS ancS deliver8cS by /1 both perti.. no later than .adn..day, June 15, lU4. '/ 2. Upon full execution ancS delivery of the lAe.e, LancSlorcS ~. will cau.e to have coap18tecS, plan. for LancSlorcS'. Work under Article I. of Exhibit .C', which plan. will be 8u))aitted to the appropriate City GoveZ'll8ent departlOents ancS be approved no later than Friday. June 17. 1194. 3. Upon Landlord'. receipt of all neces.ary penait. encS approval. to proceecS with con.truction within the lA..ecS Preml8.., Landlord agre.. to diligently prosecute .uch work through coapletion, and deliver the lAa.ecS Pr.mie.s in the concSition outl1necS uncSer Article I. of Exhibit .C" no leter than July.18, 1994. 4. If Landlord receive. ell nece..ary pe1'llit. and approval. by June 15, 1994, encS LandlorcS doe. not coaplete the work callecS for uncSer Article I. of Exhibit 'c' on or before _July 31, 1914, Tenant .hall bave the option of tenainating thi. lAa.e by delivering written notice to LancSlord no 18ter than Aur¡ust 3, 1914. If Landlord does not recdve .uch notice fro. Tenant, thl8 lAa.. .hall remain in full forca encS effect ancS .hall COIIIIence trOll LancSlorcS'. coapletion of .uch work. 5. Tenant ha. agreed to u.a it. be.t and rea.onabla efforts to u.e it. available re.ourca. to allow LancSlorcS to in.tall only one hancSicef.pecS acca..ible toilet room in the Laa.ecS Premi.e. (Art cle I.C., SANITARY FACILITIES, of Exhibit .C"). Tenant will advl8e LancSlord of it. 8ucce.. in obtaining .uch approval. froa the appropriate 9oveZ'll8ent a;ancie., upon aignin; of the lAa.e. 6. Tenant i. to contract eeparataly with contractor of Tenant'. choice for ita .pecialbecS '1'anant I.prov....nts (1.e., conference room, chan;e. to li;hting, air concSitionin;, ductin;, work .tation., electrical plu;e, ancS coaputer wirin;). lAndlord will un it. be.t efforts to coordinate with tho.e effort. of Tenant'a contractor in allowing efficient ancS co.t-affective ~l.'don for both pertia.. '1'IŒ l'ORZGOING IS D1ŒBY ACCEPTED, AGR:EI!D TO, COIIl"IRMED, AND ACDIOWL!DGED THIS DAY OF 1114. CITY OF c:øuu. VISTA DLTON '1'ITLI: CORPORATION By: Ch!.:p~ ~"'6c&- pi' DIWIT Vice Pra.ident Ita: t::( 1?1. ¿r' /O~ 02 ? -;1 1--- --------- .----..-...------ -- , "--------- BY SJ:GNJ:NG '1'IIJ:S DOCUMENT TENANT CONFJ:RMS 'l'IIAT ALL OF '1'IŒ PROVJ:SJ:ONS CONTAJ:NED J:N '1'IIJ:S LEASE RAVE BEEN IIEAD AND UNDERSTOOD. PARAGRAPH SECOND PROVJ:DES FOR '1'IŒ EXTENSJ:ON OF '1'IIJ:S LEASE BEYOND '1'IŒ ORJ:GJ:IIAL TERM. " CITY or CIIt1LA VISTA aLTON TITLI! CORPORATION By: ()/pjh , tf7 'l'ENANT J:t8: 4 rr~ J¿')r02g/ )O-3ò ~,);¿ - ; ~11- - -. ~---~-- ~-------- - O- . ! ADDmCIN TO L&AB AGaUMI:IfT JKnBU XII. TON'ITI'LI cauc:llAnON.AND DII CITY or CIR/LA. 'YIlT'" pea PItDIIIU '" T - &A8T B ftIIUT.1RIln I. œIILA 'YIlT A, c:.u.JPœI'QA. --'r'..- . ~-"'....~--.,.~......--_.. ...... - . .... - - .. - ..... ""- ~ .. .. ~~..IIIIt~_._"';-.""- n88"- .. .. ... . CIo8IIr -- .... ~ - ...", ... -. -....... ¡ """_JO""-_.~._"'--~"" . ,Î .-~----I!o<-~ '. ...;.-ä__s._odtlotlU-li....-il- . , ;..-~.- '=-~~~---~~:;.øe¡.. .~~.- -.-..~-~-:-::~, -".. -- ~:'...- '..' -'-'.. aI'Y œ c:III.U ~A SIL'IaI mLI CC¡III'CI8A'IDf ~Ð~-,. . . ~'~ ""~C" ¡£¡Ç-/f-~f -. . ..'. I .J..~ /t//.2j -,2,:1.- ----------- -- -----.-.-.- .-.----------.. r I -... - -.- ,..u- -.. - '011-.,. .1... - I -- _"~"-.r ". ,... ~---- ft~ CIOIpO.ñ OIl. .. -, .... ClIo Citor 0'081. -...:: -.c. - ClIo -- or 118t lut ... -. "8úto ..,", Yi8I:a, IIo1Uaai& 111101 ':"'* -::F .... - -=' ~ =- ~ --... ~ ~ "l.: ~ == ~.-.:=t:"-=-~Ó': -==:"..:'u: e",IOD.). -- - win lie ..,- - -. ~ - ~ or -~~. 18 - ...180 -. 11.8. = . All .-, , e"N'.'." . ""b,.- .... _r"~r'.. ~I.r= ::J:: ":" ~ U1u:="..ioa": ,/ .. ,,"~. 1II"1Iii _t QU r.J: _11 lie _nor --... 8Ino..o- ----- _<-e. .... _u- "" - s- _n' .. - '. =~-::""':"::r~~ún~.:r...==-=r~~.. '--'--'-'" --,. ,'" _., r., - 8A11 .. -.- .... - en """"'",~-- ., 818 -,", ',.."",,,.. -... .....bt-'~ - of.... '~-'zJ:".,.J' =:'lIMll :':"t"'" -- wi... .... ....... IR- . .... -=I~I." t,=":'=~ ~~ ~ -_oaI.4I_.""'ac. __0""1.._" ÞOtJI....I.", .... tt- 8ay or .... - '¡. 0bI.8 ~- _u lie -- .. . ---- lit -- - - .... u...... --_~r'--.ulle-~-- ~....U~o,_. -:=: ~=-=¡::.. -== ~ 1~~~ -:;1::. ~~~...::.:r::.. ~~e") ..,.. ~ to - - - . - "Þ ........'-iIII - _.r -.s. - aII811- --- ~ =-=~"~ ~..~~r:.~ _1808 -. '.... ~ 18 _r _u.. - -- - - ..u..s." :' , e') - - II8SaI 18 ..r...1\ or ur or - _JaJ_, _.. ~u- or lu - ~.t.... --..1.8 -.u- 18 _1.- .. ..1.. .. - "'_1.. .u 0' -.,.uoo. ") ___Þ_"_o'---.-I.. =c - _"-. ...... - - þ' _180 "" .... o. - u.. or _'0 ..- u ~ I... .-. --ø_-. --. - "" ~ -MIl................ .'DI' , "", u ..- -.ca, ca. - 111ft .. -......... ---.. '" ()¿£)~ "'~~ /' ,- .... .I.CIII-- Ir' (?~r- ~ /¿;)r- J f) -t?-Ý-' -~-- ----------------..----- .._---_.._---~--~--- r ADDZImDM :r The under.igned partiee agree ~o the fOllowing with reference to the Lea.e Agre..ent deted May 16, 1994 by and between Kelton Title Corporation, as Landlord, and tlIe City of Chula Viata, as Tenant, for tlIe Pr..iaes of 1550 last "H" street, Suite "07", Chula Viata, California nno: - Tenant shall have and is hereby granted one Option of one (1) year to extend the terms of tlIis Lease upon tlIe same teras and i¡ conditions of tlIe existing Lease Agre..ent, witll exception of tlIe Guaranteed Montllly Rent, which shall be Sixteen Hundred Dollar. ::' ($1,600.) , which amount will be adjusted each year by the percentage ot increase, it any, in Cons...er Price Index, U.S. City Average, All It..e, Index-v, (1982-1984 . 100) for tlIe last reported period i...ediat81y prior to tlIe date of tlIa exacution of tlIia Lease which was - for tlIa nation (to be initialed as soon .. published). In tlIe event tlIia index shall be hereafter converted to a different .tandard reterence be.e or otherwise revised, tlIe determination of percentage increa.e shall be "de using such conver.ion factor, formula or table as "y be publi.hed by tlIa Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor agency. This index shall be known as tlIa base CPI t1gur& for tlIe purpo.e of tlIis Lease. During tlIe 12tl1 month of tlIe Pri&ary Lea.e Term, the parties shall acquaint th...elve. with tlIe Cons...er Price Index reported during tlIat month and shall determine the 8IIIount by which the Con....er Price Index reported during tlIese month. shall have increa.ed OVer said bese CPI figure. The amount of this increase beginning tlIe first day of the tarm extended by this Option .hall be converted to a percentage of increa.e OVer the bese CPI figure, and tlIe guaranteed monthly rent shall be increased by the same percentage as said percentage of - incraase. In order for Tenant to exercise it. Option a. provided herdn, Tenant shall deliver written notice of its exercise of tlIe Option to Landlord no later tlIan sixty (60) days prior to tlIe date upon which tlIe Primary Term expires. In no event during the term of this Leaee shall the guaranteed monthly rent established for each twelve-aonth period be le.. than for the imoediately preceding twelve-month period. Said Option is expressly conditioned and contingent upon the , following: (1) Tenant not being in default of any of the provisions, teras or conditions of its Lea.e Aqre..ent .t the tille said Option is .xercised or prior to tlIe effective date of the Option. (2) The current Tenant in peasession of the Premiae., !tot it. .ssir-ee or suble.see, being th. Tenant in possession ot the Pr.. ... at the tiae of 'l'anant'. election to exercise its Option. '1'IIE ABOVE IS ØEREBY APPROVED, COIl7IRMED, ACRIED '.1'0, ACKNOWLEDGED AIID ACCEPTED ON THIS - DAY OF , 1994, AT SANTA MONICA, CA. CITY OF CIIt!LA VISTA DIIl'ON TITLE CORPORATION By: ~~~ By: 'l'INAII'1' liar 11;øn LANDIÞRD Vice President It.: -.2-> - /t9~ J I /;0 -1.). I":; Lì _._-~--- ------- -~-- -~-- Io..l'-f+' 0 ATTACHMENT 1 Energy Conservation Fund 280-2821 Account Description Budget 5271 Rentals and Leases $7,000 5251 Utilities $3,000 5252 Telephone $3,000 5398 Other commodities $4,000 5301 Office Supplies $1,000 5231 Insurance $2,000 TOTAL $20,000 /tJr ');; /- ~" .-- >"' -) ATTACHMENT 2 11-SD-VAR P.M. VAR EA 995196-3TEL3-114239 Agreement No. 11-4239/A1 Telecenter Study AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON . is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to herein as CITY. RECITALS 1. The parties hereto entered into an Agreement District Number 11-4239 (Document No. 9459) on June 30, 1994, said Agreement defining the terms and conditions of a project for preparation of a study for a telebusiness work center, referred to herein as PROJECT. 2. It has been determined that PROJECT will not be completed prior to the termination date of said Agreement. IT IS THEREFORE MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. The termination date specified in Section III, Article 9, of the original Agreement, shall now be June 30,1996, instead of June 30, 1995. 2. The other terms and conditions of said Agreement 11-4239 (Document 9459) shall remain in full force and effect. )¿,}/Ji ~ - / jr 11-4239/Al 3. This Amendment to Agreement 11-4239 is hereby deemed to be part of Document 9459. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: By: Deputy District Director Certified as to funds District Resource Manager Approved as to form Approved as to form and procedure and procedure Attorney Department of Transportation - Certified as to Procedure Accounting Administrator 2 )¡;~J3 / ,-r-< -) I 11-SD-VAR P.M. VAR EA 995196-3TEL3-114239 Agreement No. 11-4239 Telecenter Stuèy COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON 0 is between the STATE OF CALI FOR..'HA , acting b and Department of Transportation, referred to herein as CITY OF Chula Vista. a body politic anà a municipal corporation of the State of Cali::ornia, referred to herein as CITY. RECITALS 1. STATE anà C:TY purs~ant to Streets and Highways Coàe Sections 114 anà 130, are authorizeà to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways within the CITY. 2. STATE wishes to have a regional Traffic Demanà management (TDM) program which includes, but is not limited to, development of TDM research aJ".d the evaluation of new tecÌ"_"lologies such as telebusiness work centers anà their pote::ltial to impact transportation mode shifts. This Agreeme::lt addresses the use of reside::ltial area-based telebusiness work centers. Marketing, business plan development and feasibility assessment must be performed as first step. This work is henceforth referred to herein as , STUDY' . 3. CITY is willing and able to perform STUDY and STATE is agreeable to this. 4. Subsequent phases in the developm~t of a telebusiness work center in the City of Chula Vista, including Implementation and Evaluation could be the subject of one or more future Agreements. 5. STATE and CITY provide benefits to the public by alleviating trips and traffic congestion in the San Diego County metropolitan area, thereby mitigating the negative impacts on air quality, travel time and energy consumption associated with such congestion. Doc. No. 9459 /tJ-;I b~ ~ ---- . ---/ 11-4239 6. The funding source under this Agreement for STUDY is the Inte~odal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act ISTEA) 23 USC SEC. 146. 7. STATE and CITY mutually desire to cooperate and jointly participate in STUDY and desire to specify herein the te~s and conditions under which the STUDY is to conducted, financed, and administered. SECTION:r CITY AGREES: 1. To carry out the Work Plan for STu"DY as specified in Attachment 1 of this Agreement. 2. To provide, from local, non-federal sources, at least twel"Je percent (12%) of the total S':'ATE contribution as matching f~nds in s~pport of STUDY. 3. To begin the work described in Attachment 1 of this Agreement July 1, 19~ orl~pon execution of this Agreement.. \.+" ¡;j;¡¡¡"er "-- _--gr. G:&:/ 4. To submit an initial billing for STUDY expenditures described in Attachment 1 of this Agreement within thirty (30) days of execution o£ this Agreement. 5. To be solely responsible for all travel costs associated with STù"DY. 6. To provide STATE monthly reports of actual expenditures £0-:: comparison against the advance payment. 7. To provide STATE with monthly written reports begir.:1ing Aug'.1st 1, 1994, or one month after work begins, describing the results of activities undertaken pursuant to the approved Work plan for STUDY. 8. To meet informally with STATE at lèast bi-monthly in order to monitor progress of STUDY. 9. To account for all costs of STUDY to be paid by STATE pursuant to this Agreement. 10. To retain or cause to be retained for audit by STATE or other government auditors for a period of three (3) years from date of final payment, all records and accounts relating to STu"DY. 2 Doc. No. 9459 /&~ J7 ~ 11-4239 l1. To return any unused portion of STATE's deposit upon completion of work, within 30 days after expiration of this Agreement or within 30 days after termination of this Agreement. SECTION II STATE AGREES: 1. To deposit with CITY within twenty-five (25) days of receipt of initial billing an amount not to exceed $50,000 to support the activities described in Attachment 1 of this Agreement. 2. To work with CITY to assure that required State and Federal laws and regulations are followed. 3. To provide prompt reviews and approvals, as appropriate, of submittals by CITY and to cooperate in timely processing of STtJDY. SECTION I!! IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Feåeral Highway Aåministra::ion (FHWA) , the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California Transportation Commission. 2. STATE shall åesignate a Contract Manager and CITY shall desigr.ate a representative through whom all communications between the two agencies shall be channeled. The initial STATE Contract Manager is MICHELE FELL-CASALE and the initial CITY representative is BARBARA Bk~BERGER. 3. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liabiliny occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. 3 Doc. No. 9459 /¿J --;rr ~ (&'? 0 ~~-4239 4. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done . by STATE under in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Codes Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY. from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. 5. Ownership, title or copyright of all product(s) of STUDY including but not limited to, reports, studies, and software developed for STUDY; will automatically be vested in STATE and no further agreement will be necessary to transfer ownership to STATE. 6. To affix the statemeTIt and disclaimer in AttachmeTIt 2 to all products of STUDY as described in the Article above. 7. provisions contained herein may be altered, changed, or amended by mutual written consent of the parties hereto. No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 8. All Attachments referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated and made part of this Agreement. 4 Dec. No. 9459 /tJ~Jl ~ (b( 11-4239 9. This Agreement shall terminate upon completion of STUDY by CITY, or on JUNE 30, 1995, whichever is earlier in time, unless all parties agree to an extension of time. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF CHULA VISrA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: &<!~~ ¿? By: ~/l~~ - Deputy District Director Approved as to form Approved as to form and procedure and Procedure r ~ J.------ ~~ ¡/ '4r.fi-1)7 £## t:p"Alf'¿L Certified as ~o funds and procedure: ti Ó//Y)/'ÁJ ~- iftrict Accounting Administrator 5 Doc. No. 9459 /¿J, ~ ¿;:J ~ (fc.,":) A IT ACHMENT I City of Chula Vista Teleœnters Project I. BACKGROUND The City of Chura Vista has developed a proposal to operate two Neighborhood Telecenters in Chula Vista. The goals of the Chula Vista telecenters include: A) serving as a pilot that will supply evaluation criteria to those interested in developing telecenters. B) monitoring and evaluating activities at the center for their transportation, air quality and energy reduction impacts. Exploring the potential of utilizing telecenters as a land use measure relating to mode.shift, trip reduction, air quality reduction measures, and congestIon management. C) assisting businesses in their compliance efforts to reduce vehicle trips while maintaining a professional alternative environment for workers to telecommute. D) Reducing vehicle trips by replacing them with the movement of information through state-of-the-art telecommunications technology (for example, video conference, fiber optics, teleshopping, etc) II. GENERAL APPROACH The Neighborhood Telecenter is proposed to be used by both public and private entities, .,.,ith the greater emphasis on recruiting employees from private businesses. Telecenters allow for the partial substitution of computers or telecommunication technologies in place of a typical commute to work by employees. The Telecenter will also contribute to reducing employee commute trips which will help businesses comply with oncoming air quality regulations, help reduce pollution from automobiles, improve jobs/housing balance, result in an approximate 12% improvement in worker productivity (according to Caltrans figures), allow employees to work closer to home, and result in cost savings for the employer from avoided transit subsidies. The goal of this project is to reduce 44 daily vehicle trips through use of the telecenter by the end of the contract period. The ultimate number of trips reduced is based on the capacity of the center and the variety of users it attracts. The first telecenter will open by August I, 1994 with 10 workstations and with a telecommuter occupancy of 25%. The second telecenter will open in the fall of 1994 with 10 workstations, for a total of 20 workstations, and the second telecenter will offer conference room facilities equipped with state.of-the art telecommunications equipment that will potentially be linked to other parts of California and to Mexico via satellite. We will develop partnerships for evening uses of the workstations and the conference room, through distance learning, computer courses, etc. We .,.,ill market the telecenters to employees and to off-peak hour uses, all those uses having the intended purpose of reducing trips and turning the telecenter into a self-sufficient operation. In order to maintain high occupancy 1 Doc. No. 9459 //J~t/ ~ rate, a variety of partnerships will be sought. During the first two years of operation, the telecenter will seek added services to be available to the public and, at the same time reduce trips. These uses include, but are not limited to distance learning, teleshopping, telemedicine, video conferencing, and night classes. At ma.ximum occupancy during year two, the goal is to reduce vehicle trips by 44 trips per day. It is expected that the telecenter can initially reduce vehicle trips by 10-44 trips per day for the first year. IV. SECURITY The City has developed an Education Technology Task Force to identify the technological needs and security concerns associated with the telecenters. The City plans to take the highest level of precaution to protect not only the computer equipment but also the privacy of those businesses patronizing the telecenter. Security is of utmost concern and will be addressed within the planning process for both telecenter sites. During ofT-peak hours, there will be a code system to enter the building and the computers and telephones will be coded as well. ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- I. CONCEPT AND OBJECTIVES THE CONCEPT The primary goal of establishing a telecenter program is to enable residents to work out of the telecenter one to five days per week. The City will develop two telecenters, both serving the city's highest concentration of "information workers" - those residents who can work at their current job at a site closer to home by using telecommunications equipment such as computers, modems and telephones to stay in tOuch "ith their offices. The telecenters "ill accommodate most computer hardware and software and allow individual commuters from Chula Vista and the local area to telecommute from a centrally located facility, thereby reducing the number of vehicles, the number of trips generated and promotes mode shift and congestion reduction on the region's highway and road infrastructure. A secondary goal is to develop partnerships that \\;11 assist in the goal of reducing and/or eliminating vehicle trips by using the telecenters for a variety of purposes at ofT- commuting hours. The City plans to establish the feasibility for state-of-the-art telecenter partnerships, such as telemedicine, video-conferencing into Mexico, teleshopping, distance learning, distance learning, and other uses that can occur in the telecenter, instead of driving long-distances and across the border. Finally, the Telecenter will assist in the economic development of the Chula Vista community by locating two telecommuting centers convenient to shops, restaurants and other public establishments creating work opportunities close to housing, capturing home and work shopping, reducing travel, and freeing-up local infrastructure resource demands. 2 Doc. No. 9459 /¿1~~2 ~ IbL} , , OBIECTIVES The follo"ing objectives are proposed based on implementation of all phases of the project: 1. The TeleCenters will be operational within nine (9) months of initiation of the project. 2. A 25% occupancy rate of the first telecenter with 10 workstations will be achieved by opening day, increasing to 50% by November 1, 1994; a 25% occupancy of the second telecenter with 10 workstations will be achieved upon opening of the telecenter, which will occur by December 1994; the occupancy rate increasing to 50% six months after opening. 3. The TeleCenters, when both are fully operational, will eliminate approximately 880 commute trips per month from the Chula Vista area. 4. The TeleCenters will meet the needs of its participants by providing computer facilities, office equipment, services to enable users to work out of the telecenter. 5. Identify if there's a market for transportation "replacement" services ~.e. partnership development) to a) reduce cross-border transportation impacts b) help meet the goal of reducing regional trips and b) enable the telecenter to become self-sufficient. 6. Identify the feasibility of turning telecenters over to the private sector as a concession once the telecenters are up-and-running. ll. PHASING DESCRIPTION The Chula Vista TeleCenters project is requesting funding for Phase I & II of a three phased program: Phase I - Business/!vIarketing Plan development and Employee Recruitment Planning, Phase II - Implementation, Operational Evaluation and Plan Update. ID. ACTIVITIES PHASE I: Business/Marketing Plan Development ånd Employee Recruitment Planning ACTIVITY PERIOD: MONTH 1 - 3 This proposal outlines activities for Phase I of the Chula Vista Telecenters which consists of conducting comprehensive marketing, promotions, site and design, and partnership development. 3 Doc. Nc. 9459 !¡}"I} ~ I '0 c;- Proposed Tasks: 1. Sdect Subcontractor City will conduct a selection process to obtain a qualified subcontractor(s) to conduct activities in Tasks 2 - 7. City will work with Site Designer to implement Product: Agreement with subcontractor to conduct marketing/promotional tasks, and to begin development of partnerships. . Activity Period: Month 1 2. Conduct Madœting Analysis Utilizing available and relevant information, task will include: 0 review of regional air quality employer trip reduction mandates. 0 Refine existing business and marketing plan to include section on partnerships. 0 employee and employer participation recruitment. 0 Conduct study on the feasibility of a) concessionairing the teleceniers to the private sector, b) the use of new technologies for potential new partnership to pursue 0 Prepare feasibility analysis and partnership report for presentation to City and CalTrans. Product: Addendum to business plan/marketing plan and report on partnership development, specifically on which have the potential for success and how those partnerships will be pursued. Activity Period: Months I -3. 3. Conduct MadœtinglReauitmentlProm:>tional Activities A marketing strategy will be launched to attract potential employer and employee users and will, at a minimum, consist of the following: 0 Develop quality brochures and information materials explaining the concept, purpose and benefits of the project targeted to the needs and interest of the market(s) identified in Task 2. 0 Announce the telecenter through press releases to major and regional 4 :Joc. No. 9459 J P-f"~ ~ 'c;",;.. newspapers, publications, voice and video media. 0 Conduct a direct mail solicitation to residents within a 3 mile radius of the telecenters and identify employers/agencies with telephone and face- to-face follow up. No less than 6,000 prospective employees and 50 prospective employer/agencies will be identified and contacted. 0 Meet with both potential employers and professional groups to explain the proposed program and identify interests and requirements. 0 Secure Participation Agreements from employers. Product: Promotional materials, revised marketing plan, letters of intent. Activity Period: 1 - 6 4. Business and Operating Plan Further develop and implement the initial Business Plan to incorporate the following: 0 Identify most likely partnerships and other revenue generating services. 0 Project start ùp and promotional costs for each partnership and service. 0 Project first year operational costs and revenues for centers, including partnerships and services. Product: Business Plan, feasibility study results Activity Period: !-.!onth 3 - 6 5. Reporting Reports will be prepared and delivered to funding agencies including Marketing Analysis tasks and Business Plan. Product: Reports provided in multiple copies and on word processing computer disk. . Activity Period: Month 3 and 6. END OF WORK TASKS IN PHASE I 5 Doc. No. 9459 )tJ-/fÇ' ~ 1{,,7 IV. BUDGET The anticipated budget requirement for Phase I of the Chula Vista TeleCenter is detailed below. CHULA VISTA TELECENTER PHASEI&ll PROPOSED BUDGET CATEGORY /ITEM # UNITS EST. FUNDING FUNDING PROJECT UNIT MATCH REQUEST TOTAL COST CONTRACT SERVICES Feasibility 300 hrs 70.00 21,000 21,000 Study /Partnership Development Marketing/Promotion 140 hrs 70.00 39,900 9,800 49,700 Recruitment Addendum to deliverable 0 30,000 0 30,000 Business/~!arketing Plan of marketing efforts Site Planning/Design 30,000 11,700 41,700 Reporting/Preparation 40 70.00 2,800 2,800 OTHER COSTS Printing/Reproduction 8,000 2,000 10,000 Telecommunications 20,000 500 20,500 Postage 4,000 1,700 5,700 Travel Reimbursement (4) 750 750 Misc. Reimbursable (5) 500 500 GRAND TOTAL 132,650 50,000 182,650 6 Doc. No. 9459 /¿J-f/~ ~ ~Ý, ATTACHMENT ~ Documents or written reports prepared under this Agreement shall contain the following statement: This report (document) was prepared through grants from the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration with the cooperation of the State of California, Department of Transportation. Documents or written reports prepared under this Agreement shall also contain the following disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. Doc. No. 9459 ,It) --'17 ~ 1(" [f RESOLUTION NO. 17538 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CITY ACCEPTANCE OF $50,000 FEDERAL INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT (lSTEA) "PASS THROUGH" MONEYS FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE CHULA VISTA TELECENTER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACT WITH CALTRANS. ESTABLISHING THE TERMS OF SUCH AGREEMENT IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY AND THE CITY MANAGER, AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO APPROPRIATE $50,000 TO THE APPROPRIATE ACCOUNTS AS NEEDED WHEREAS, as part of the City's overall effort toward development of a comprehensive energy conservation and air quality improvement program, and consistent with the City's Environmental Agenda. the City applied for funding from the State of California Department of Transportation (CaITrans); and. WHEREAS. CalTrans and the City pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Sections 114 and 130, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways within the San Diego County metropolitan area; and, WHEREAS, the CalTrans wishes to have a regional Traffic Demand management program which includes the research and the evaluation of new technologies such as telebusiness work centers and their potential to impact transportation mode shifts; and, WHEREAS, up to $50,000 in federallntermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (lSTEA) "pass through" monies from CalTrans will be given to the City of Chula Vista to assist in the development of the Chula Vista Telecenters; and. WHEREAS, the City will receive a total, not to exceed $50,000 to implement the Chula Vista Telecenter Project; and. WHEREAS, the Agreement between the C.ity and CalTrans will address the use of residential area-based telebusiness work centers and development of partnerships therein; and, WHEREAS, marketing, business plan development and feasibility assessment must be performed as a first step toward implementation of the Telecenters; WHEREAS, in order to proceed with a contract between the City and CalTrans, CalTrans requires a resolution which authorizes the Mayor to proceed with contract negotiations, in accordance with the CalTrans ISTEA Funding guidelines. Doc. t;o. 9459 /¿í-yr ~ 1'70 Resolution No.1 7538 Page 2 NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula ¡ista does hereby authorize the Mayor to execute a contract with CalTrans establishing the terms of such an Agreement in a form acceptable to and approved by the City Attorney and the City Manager. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is hereby authorized to appropriate $50.000 to a newly established activity account within the Energy Conservation Fund. earmarked Telecenter II. Account 280.2806. Presented by ~~-¿ Barbara Bamberger Environmental Resource Manager Dec. No. 9459 )[)-Yf 4?- \ '--, ì n"""",LO"" "U. 1/:>">1:1 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California. this 21 st day of June, 1994, by the following vote: YES: Councilmembers: Fox. Horton. Moore, Rindone NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Nader ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I. Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista. California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 17538 was duly passed. approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 21 st day of June. 1994. Executed this 21st day of June. 1994. ~~ () () m I. fj£ Beverly. Authelet, City Clerk Dec. lio. 9459 I¿J~ S--tJ ~ 17;) "I I "~nI.'C" I ..> .oe... 0 -1üïi" BOLLENBACHER & KELTON,INC. : ': - . 5109 Waling Rcad. San Diego. Call1c,",a 92120 . Phone (619) 582-9111 .~".... ...e' ,0" 2716 Ocean Park Blvd., SOlIe 3006. Santa Monica. Cahlornla 90405-5207 . Phone (213) 396.4514 0'1<0" L~"L K"'co Rc,,"'d Ko"en o."d K~ICO R J S.an<' Ma,' KOhco June 7, 1995 City of Chula Vista Telecenter Angie Jarchow, Te1ecenter Director 1550 E. "H" Street, Suite J Chula Vis ta, Ca. 91913 Dear Angie: As you know, your lease for Suite OJ in the Otay Lakes Plaza building will expire on June 18, 1995. Based on our phone conversation on May 30, 1995, the following agreement was made: Under the terms of your lease, Bollenbacher & Kelton, Inc. will allow the City of Chu1a Vista to continue on a month to month basis through August 31, 1995 at the current rental rate and otherwise in accordance with the terms of the lease. The contract includes a rental rate of $1,600.00 per month. The only provision is that the City of Chula Vista call Bollenbacher & Kelton, Inc. in July to update them on whether or not the Te1ecenter will be able to extend the lease after August 31, 1995 or cancel it based on funding received to continue operating. dïiJ¡~ Bollenbacher & Kelton, Inc. By: Linda Lasher, Property Manager The undersigned Lessee hereby approved, confirmed, agreed to, acknowledged and accepted the above agreement. Lessor: BO1~ By: By: Print Name: L.i naa L.c6hev' 1¿}~5'1 ~ .--. .. ~ .-. (73 ou cab Landlord hereby agra.., axcepting for caua.. beyond Landlord'a control, to erect the building depicted in Exhibit "B", a portion of which approxiaately 1,400 aq. ft. .hall be laa..d to the underaigned Tenant. laid conatruction .hall be COlD leted in accordance with Exhibit .C" hereto attached, ""'111.." fn u~..e II...., h. O'...n.Ua a...hal, i. ...41. ~~ '.11._- ......h ~ Ita Tal u, iOlo'" ..'. f&~O' aal.U~ .f ".6 e"n.Un .f ~h ."", OIoh ..... a~all L a ...14 &...5 wI .~ ? f. t:i.u fa.... .O' .U..II.* Any additional change, .oc1if1cation or alteration not contained 1n Exhibit .C. .hall be at the .ole coat and axpanaa of.Tenant. '!'he !'enent a91"ee. that upon the coap18tion of the erection of .aid building .ub.tantiall~ in accordenee with the plan. and .peeification. therefor /Ian upon the delivery of "'HO"~ t. -,t. tho "'M'" vm ...... "', """'" I, tho ~ condition which it .ay then be. ..., .1."". 8'1.,1 \ a 101.01 a,d.""'. "r~~.~' fn .R). un., IIl.ruUj ... I.P.III...al1" ._i.il.. ~ v~L ~I Uo. ww..,UlL... .1 kl.. "~-hd .-._h -, .... arr..h..&I0"". I V'.hh, "". 'af'" ...a..'. "".n." ..11 "". a",l.,a.I1' ""nut. r Tenant .h.ll thereafter .ave and hold uralea. the Landlord frOlD liability a. provided in th18 Laeae. '!'he fact that the 'J'enant ..y enter into po..e..ion prior to the actual completion of the building for the purpo.. of inatal11ng fixture. and equipaent .hall not be de..ed an acceptance by the Tenant of completion by the Landlord until actual .....pletion .hall have taken place, but 1n .uch event Tenant .ball hold Landlord hanlle.. and indemnify Landlord for any 10.. or daaage to Tenant'. fixture., equipment and .erchand18e and for injury to any peraon., unlee. ....e be cau.ed by the active 1\8911,ence of Landlord or it. egent.. Upon actual coapletion of the iJlprov..enta to be cOlllpleted by Landlord in the building, the Landlord a91"ee. to If= racord a Notice of Complation in the office of the COunty Recorder. July lB, 1994, or '!'he ten of th18 Lea.e ahall _ence on the day on which Landlord deliver. the d..18ed Pr..18e. to Tenant, OlOp 0 all of the Landlord'. work 1. ;Selayed by Tenant'. failure to complete the necea.ary work, Landlord ..y tile a Notice of Cea..tion of Work or a Notice of COIIIpletion on the portion of Landlord'. work actually completed. and the fi11ng of either of .uch notic.. ahall be equivalent to the tiling of a valid Notice of COIIIpletion. If the ten -once. on a day Other than the fint day of a calardar aonth, the ten of th18 Laaae .ball be ir. effect tor the pal~ikl aonth and until the termination data .et forth in the Lea.e. Al.o in that event, rant for the crtial .onth &ball be prorated on the ba.18 of the .onthly .in UJD rent. lIban the CODen~t date i. determined, the partie. ahall exacute a cartificata of the date of _an_ant. ear or to ccxur. *See IIi4er II. CI'1'Y 0.. CIIt1u. VISTA UL'1'ON TI'l'LI: CORPOIlATION . ~.~< By: (J/.iJ~- / '1'I:NANT IIa e on DLORD Vice Preaident Ita, q-7?"--;J'- ~ /tif:2- ._---~ 17LI , ~ The Landlord bereby e;re.., except in; tor caus.. beyond Landlord's reasonable control, to phydcsllY complete the work described in Exhibit "C', Article 1., "Description of Landlord'. Work., no later than July lB, 1884, provided thefollowin; avanta occur within the re.pective per1ocS. atsted below: 1. Thia Leaee A;ree.ent 1. tully executed 'ancS deliverecS by 'I both partie. no later thsn .edne.day, June 15, ln4. 'I 2. Opon full execution and delivery ot tha La..a, Landlord ': will cau.e to bave completed, plan. tor Landlord'. Worl< uncSer Article I. ot J:xhibit "C", which plane will be aubmitted to the appropriate City Governaent departm.nts and be approved no later than Friday, June 17, 18U. 3. Upon Landlord'a receipt ot all nece.ury permit. end approval. to proceecS with con.truction within the LaancS Pr8llliae., Landlord a;re.. to dnic¡ently pro.ecute auch work throu;h completion, and deliver th. Le..ed Premius in the condition outlined under Article I. ot J:xhibit .C" no later than July.lB, ln4. 4. It Landlord receives all necenary permits and approval. by June 15, leU, and Landlord do.. not complete th. worl< called tor under Article 1. ot Exhibit "C' on or before _July 31, ln4, Tenant aball bave the option of teninatin; thia Leu. by deliverinc¡ written notice to 1.andlord no later than Au;U.t 3, ln4. If Landlord does not receive auch notice from Tenant, thia Laa.. .hall remain in full force and effect and aball co...ence troll Landlord'a complation of auch work. 5. Tenant baa a;reed to u.e ita be.t and raa.onable efforts to u.e it. evanable re.ource. to allow LancSlord to in.tall only one bandicapped acce..ible toilet room in the La..ed Praiae. (Article I.C., SANITARY FACILITIES, of J:xh1bit "C"). Tenant will edvbe Landlord of its aucce.. in obtainin; such approval. troll the appropriate 'lovernaent a;encie., upon aivn1.n; ot the Laa.e. 6. Tenant i. to contrect .eparately with contractor of Tenant'. choice tor it. .pecislized Tenant Improv8lllents (i.e., conterence room, chsn;.. to li;htin;, air conditionin;, duct in; , work atation., electrical plu;., and cOllputer wirin;). Landlord will u.e it. be.t effort. to coordinate with tho.. effort. ot Tanant' a contractor in all_in; efficient and co.t-effective COJIpledon tor both partie.. '1'IŒ PDREGOIIIC: IS JlERJ!:BY ACCEPTED, AGRZJ:D '1'0, COIIFIJtIŒD, AND AC:IJIOW1ZDGED '1'IUS DAY OF ln4. C1'1'Y OF CIIOLA VISTA UL'1'OII 'l'I'1'L! CORJlOI!ATIOII By: Ch!'¿ì~ .,. ...6'l~-" / 'RllAIIT Vice Pra.ident Ita : t:{" 1?1 i>' ~ ~ ///-5';; , -------- BY SIGNING THIS DOCUlŒNT TENANT CONFIRIIS THAT ALL OF '1'IŒ PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THIS LEASE HAVE: BEEN READ AND IJIIt)E:RSTOOD. PARAGRAPII SECOND PROVIDES FOR '1'IŒ EXTENSION OF ~IS LEASE BEYOND TIlE ORIGINAL '1'E:RM. CI'l'Y OF c:øt1U. VISTA KELTON '1'ITIZ CORPORATION By: ()!p~ If' 'l'EHANT It..:~ rr'? /c:J:5Ý ~ ; -11- !7L", - . ! ADDmCIR TO I.&AR AGaU.JØm' ~ XII. TOI'! Tn'1.I c:caPCIIIA nON AND 'l1li CITY or CBUL4 \'lIT A. rea PIIDØIU "T .. LUr B ftJI&&T. tmn " CIIUI.A 'YIlT At CAJJrO8I'IJA, _.....~- . ~_~I_- "'r~""""-~ ---..... -- ..---- ""--~ -.. ~"-Ølp"---""-"'~ --~- .,.. -.0.." -.,- ... -........ - - - .. ¡ -"--,,,,---1-.,--...--..- . ,J ._-------..,,~ '. ......k.._",_........- Ci...._M- . . . "-."'Ú881~_"""~-,!~..!...._I.... ..U. -_.~. .-- _-d' -- ...~ ~-:P-=:t ~ A~~~ -..-. ..'S' '.. . . lIlY fit CIIIII.A 'VII1'A ...1aII1m.& 1IqIII'C8A1DI :jU'~-" ~ . ~~ --'I/"c" 4£t:-/(-"I' . 1W8:'. .... . ! .;¿.p /¿}~ç' ~ ¡ \ ~ I - --.s..... puU" - .. ... ,.11-'" wi. - \ to .... -.. M'" -r ", u., ~ - - -- ftu. _..:r.;..~' _. - ... 0:1"1' et. ca.1. -.1 !8 -, -.... - Of .... -. ... -, hi" or. -- .£.øta, _Ueaia ...... ~ -:::u ... - -= :: ~ --... --.: -:.: :.l C.u.. Of - -18UIII - _. 111. -... Of ... -- ......r -, - .... .. .-- DoUan (81.CO'.I. 8ich - win .. ..~- - -. ~ .... ~ 8C -, ~ _. '" - Ir- -. II... 01-.. . ioU ""'. -"', (1"'."" .. lAID) - - .- _100 -., ~- .. ... - ., ... -- et ...... *.011 - ---- - ... Md- C" .. ",..1a18d .. - .. pal>1.-). 111 - -, .'" - -" ... --- I, -..... .. . ........ -- ..,- - .. - }I _iMd. --.......,---_U."'- .,' .. =~ -=::r~ra::=~.; tL c=::.=r.::.::!~r" '"-' --.- ... -- ..,. . roo .- 8811'" -.. - - en "",,"'XU---, Of." -..,-,..,.",- -... ............ - of ... 1r1,l!u7.- -, ~ 0, ~' .nU.. ~l:':",iM -- wi'" ""_.'Ir_"'. . ::-"-=.~... ',= '="::U"::--- a:...:"~ -= --- - MU -. en 'Mu", - - et ".0 _.. ÞOIIMI", ... Urn MY Of ... '- - IV ... ...- _11 Do -- to . ---- of -- - Go - .... U....., -... ----~r- 801'- -~-- --- .. ..U -- er _. -:-=r :s:=-..¡::.. -== ~r 1-c::,::-,r::. a;~ .... ....u- .. 10- -. -r C"I ..,. ...- .. - - - .... ... IIr&aoo7 .... _u-. ' ' . :, "þ.. ';""': -... ... .... ot .... - IIDoU ... ......... ~r ...., _U- - - _"- _108 ... 1888 -- - ... ~O81r ~ eRl- _1". .... ....... '" -"r -- - ~ - ... ..n......,. ~. , _C~ .::rJ:Of~"::"~ ='.=::. C~~ '" _1- .. ..... .. - ..t_l.. -.. e' ... .,..... ;::.~ ::- ::-.~.1: =-~ e",,'" -a:: ':' ::: .. ... .- lit _'0 ..- .. ~&ao ... --_. -.. "-~~-=--' ~. - to: 1M', U ..- _lea. ea. - ""'___A ---- '" (h!j)" ~ "'~~ -- - / .... -- I~' ('~V- ~ . , )¿J/-f6 ~ r &nDZNDOJI I The underei9ned partie. e9ree to the tollowin9 with reterence to the Lea.e Airee..ant deted Mey 16, 1'114 by and betwean Kelton Title Corporation, a. Landlord, and the City of Chula Vista, a. Tenant, for the Pr..isa. of 1550 .a.t ex" Itraet, 8uita e;S", Cbula Vi.ta, Ca1.l.fornia 1111110: Tenant .hall have and i. hereby vranted one Option ot one (1) year to extend the term. ot thi. Lea.e upon the ...e teras and ;, condition. of the existini Leue Aire..ent, vith axception of the Guaranteed Monthly .ent, which .hall be Sixtaen Bundrad Dollar. } ($1,600.), which ..ount vill be adjuated each year by the percentage ot increa.e, it any, in Con....er Price Index, V.S. City Averaie, All It..., Index-v, (lU2-1IÞ84 . 100) for the la.t reported period i..edietely prior to the date of the execution ot this Le..e which v.. - for the nation (to be initial ad .. .oon a. published). In the event this index ahell be hereatter converted to a different .tendard reterence be.e or Othervi88 revised, the determination of percentage increa.e .hall be Ude uaini .uch convaraion factor, formula or table a. uy be publi.hed by the Bureau of Labor Statistic. or ita .ucce..or agency. '1'hi. index .hall be Icnown a. the bu. CPI tiflUre for the purpo.e of this Lea.e. During the 12th 80nth ot the Priaary Lea.e Term, the partie. .hall aco¡uaint th"'elve. vith the Con....er Price Index reported durini that 80nth and ahall datermine the aaount by which the Con.lDler Price Index reported durini the.e 80nth. .hall have increa.ed over .aid be.e CPI tiflUre. 'l'he aaount ot this increa.. begiMini the tir.t day of the term extended by this Option .hall be converted to a percentage of increa.e over the be.e CPI ti!\lre, and the flUarante.d 80nthly rent .hall be increa.ed by the eUle percentage a. .aid percentage ot. increa.e. In order for Tenant to exerci.e ita Option a. provided herdn, Tenant .hall deliver written notice of it. exercise of the Option to Landlord no later than .ixty (60) day. prior to the date upon which the Primary Term expire.. In no event durini the term of this Lea.e shall the flUaranteed 80nthly rent ..tabli.hed for each twelve-80nth r:.riod be le.e than . for the illaedietely precedini twelv.-.onth per od. Said Option i. expr...ly conditioned and continvent upon the , followini: (1) Tenant not being in default of any of the providon., teras or condition. of ita Lea.e Aire..ent at the tille .eid Option i. exerci.ed or prior to the ettective date of the Option. (2) 'l'he current'1'8nant in po."..ion of the Pruise., "ot ita e..i9l\.e or euble..ee, bei"9 the Tenant in po..e..ion Of the Pruise. .t the tiae of 'l'enant'. election to exerei.e ita Option. '1'IŒ ABOVE IS IlEREBY APPRoVI:D, COIl7IRlŒD, AGREED '1'0, ACIQIOWLEDGZD AND ACCZP'l'ED ON 'l'HIS - DAy OF , 1"4, AT 8AN'1'A MONICA, CA. CI'1'Y OP cøcu. VISTA DL'J'OJI '1'I'1'Lr: CORPORATION By: tR~~ By: 'l'ENAII'J' liar e11;l>n loAIfDIÞRD Vice Pre.ident Ita: ~ /fJ--->l THIS PAGE BUNK )j)~çr ~ COUNCil AGENDA STATEMENT Item / / Meeting Date 06/27/95 ITEM TiTlE: Resolution /79 J/YAmending the FY 1995/96 City budget to include Year 1 Border Environmental Commerce Alliance appropriations in the amount of $956,536 which includes the addition of three interim full-time administrative positions SUBMITTED BY: Community Developme~ector ¿-c.., , REVIEWED av, CI'y M,"""Ji:¡ ~ ~ 14I5<h, Yo<" "'-"-No_' BACKGROUND: On January 1O, 1995, oun:1 approved the three year Border Environmental Commerce Alliance (BECA) budget and related staff for submission in the City's application to EDA. The BECA budget and staff have subsequently been approved by EDA and are included in the existing agreement between the City and EDA (which authorizes the EDA grant). At the January Council meeting, staff indicated that the BECA budget and staff would be brought back to Council to be formally adopted as part of the City's overall budget process. Therefore the recommendation this evening is for Council to take the necessary administrative actions to legally appropriate the already approved BECA budget and staff as part of the City's FY 1995/96 budget. Specifically, staff is recommending that Council adopt and appropriate the Year 1 BECA budget and approve the addition of the three BECA interim City personnel. Staff will return for approval of Year 2 and Year 3 BECA budgets concurrently with submission of the City's FY 1996/97 and FY 1997/98 budgets, respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution: 1) adopting the FY 1995/96 Year 1 BECA budget as delineated within this staff report, 2) adding three interim full-time City BECA positions, and 3) appropriating $956,536. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: BECA Budaet The total three year BECA budget, as approved by Council, is $3,187,823. The BECA budget covers three functional areas: BECA administration (City Interim Staff), the Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC), and the Border Environmental Business Cluster (BEBC). In terms of revenue sources, the $3,187,823 budget includes grant funding, City and Rohr contributions and projected program revenue (such as incubator rental fees). Per the existing EDA agreement the BECA program is to become operational- and EDA funds can be spent - effective July 1, 1995. As discussed above, in order to authorize expenditures of BECA funds, staff is recommending that Council appropriate the Year 1 BECA budget in the amount of $956,536 to General Fund 1OO, BECA Account, Division 0262 concurrently with the adoption of the city's overall FY 95/96 budget. As indicated above, staff will return in future year budget cycles to request appropriation of BECA Year 2 and Year 3 budgets. The overall three year BECA budget ("Master Program Budget") and Organizational Chart ("BECA Functions & Staffing") are provided for your information as Attachments G & A, respectively. Attachment G shows staff broken down by BECA administration (interim City personnel), BETRC, and BEBC, as well as all combined operational expenses for the entire program. This budget includes projected program revenues, such as incubator rental income and projected corporate sponsorships. Attachments H. I. and J, respectively, show further line item breakdowns for each of the three /)-) i' 'ì '--, Page 2, Itemg Meeting Date 6/27/95 functional areas. (These documents were provided to and approved by Council at the January 1O, 1995 meeting.) The BECA Year 1 budget delineated below proposed for adoption as part of the City's FY 95/96 budget is identified within Attachment G. For purposes of the recommended appropriation action, the BECA Year 1 budget has been reformatted into line item accounts consistent with those of the City's Finance Department as follows: YEAR 1 BECA PROGRAM BUDGET FUNDING SOURCES PROGRAM OBJECT DESCRIPTION CTCA EDA CDBG REVENUE' TOTAL CJWÐ rorAL Staff Services': 5101 Sala,ie. 0 $ 98.424 $ 29,160 0 $ 124,922 5103 Oveftima 0 1.591 0 1,591 5141 Retirement 0 13.264 4.048 0 18,346 6142 Empioyae Benefit Plan 0 11.200 6.460 0 17,760 6143 Medicare 0 1.400 454 0 ~ $164,991 Specialized Con"ac! Services:' 6203 Con"act Sarvices $91.050 607,833 0 80,007 678,890 BEBC Development Fee' 0 0 0 60.000 60000 738,890 6221 T,avel 0 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 6224 T,aining 0 867 0 $ 1,143 2.000 5398 Capital Outlay IFurniture! 0 $ 5,000 0 0 $ 5.000 5271 Computer/Copie,/Fax Laases 0 19,655 0 0 19.655 5301 Office Supplies 0 900 0 0 900 5212 Printing and Binding 0 800 0 0 800 5218 Postage 0 500 0 0 500 5252 Telephone 0 1,800 0 0 1.800 5399 Program Reserve 0 0 0 $ 20.000 20,000 52,655 $ 956,536 , Program Revenue is projected income from BEBC rental fees, corporate sponsorships, and, potentially, client fees. 2 Staff Services refer QDjy to 1.00 BECA Director, 1.00 Contract Manager, 1.00 Administrative Assistant, I.E. the three BECA interim City personnel. Each position is budgeted to allow hiring up to "E" step. (Other BECA personnel are covered under Specialized Contract Services, which pertains to contracts for administration of the BETRC and BEBC programs.) 3 Specialized Contract Services refer to the contracts for administration of the BETRC and BEBC. These respective contracts cover ~ costs associated with the two programs including personnel and operating costs. (Note: the contract with Southwestern College for administration of the BETRC was approved by Council on June 20, 1995.1 4 BEBC Development Fee refers to: 1) $50.000 per the existing agreement with the California Business Incubation Network (CBINI and Business Cluster Development (as previously approved by Council) for the development of the BEBC, fund-raising, and interim BEBC administration (this $50,000 fee will be paid exclusively from fund-raising proceeds generated by the contractors); and 2) $10,000 for additional proposed services from Business Cluster Development (BCD) related to statewide Environmental Business Cluster networking per a future contract. ) /-"t Page 3, Item / 1 Meeting Date 6/27/95 BECA Staffina As noted above, on January 10, 1995 Council approved the BECA budget and staffing (Attachment G) for submission to EDA. The subsequent EDA award and related agreement with the City reflect these prior approvals. Staff is now recommending that Council formally add the three interim BECA personnel positions as part of the City's FY 95/96 budget (see Attachment B). The BECA Budget delineates the maximum combined salary and fringe levels for each of the BECA positions. While these numbers reflect maximum levels, actual salary ranges are shown on Attachment B, which also shows comparable City positions. As reported to Council on January 10, the positions, job descriptions and salary ranges were developed for recommendation to Council by an informal task force of representatives from the California Business Incubation Network and Business Cluster Development (the City's incubator development consultants). Southwestern College, Environmental Business Partners (an environmental business consultant). the City's Environmental Resource Manager, and the Community Development and Personnel Departments. As noted, these were approved by Council on January 10, 1995. All BECA staff costs are fully provided for by the EDA Grant and the City's CDBG cash match. Job descriptions have been attached for your information; these were given to Council with the January 10 report (see Attachment C, D, and E). As indicated in the January 10 staff report, staff has moved ahead with the recruitment and selection of BECA staff following the EDA award in February, in order to meet the EDA program start date of July 1, 1995. In response to questions raised by Council at the January 10 meeting, the City Manager noted that staff would keep Council informed of this process. Accordingly, the attached memo was sent to Council as an update (See Attachment F). FISCAL IMPACT: 1) Cost to the City Appropriation of the BECA Program budget will not result in any new fiscal impact to the City. However, on January 10 Council approved the following City contributions for the total three year program: Cash In-Kind . City Cash Match (CDBG) $119,976 . Facility Improvements (CDBG) 42,223 . Non-cash City staff in-kind match $68.413 (existing Community Development staff time) . On-site office space and overhead for Not Quantified the three federally-funded BECA staff 2) Year 1 Budget Appropriation Of the $956,536 being appropriated for Year 1, the funding sources are as follows: EDA (Federal) $665,224 CTCA (State) 91,050 CDBG (City) 39,1125 Program Revenues 161,150 $956,536 s The $39,112 is the Year 1 expenditure from the total $119,976 City cash match. 1/';3 -----..- ------- - ------------ Page 4, Item / / Meeting Date 6/27/95 Attachments: A Organizational Chart ("BECA Functions & Staffing") B BECA Staff Costs C BECA Director Approved Job Description D Contract Manager Approved Job Description E Administrative Assistant Job Description F Information Memorandum (Dated May 8, 1995) G Master Program Budget H Master BECA Program Budget I Master BETAC Program Budget J Master BEBC Program Budget IIMOI o:\wp5I1doo"moot\458_95 IJ""o 22, 199511 //-1 " RESOLUTION NO. /79~,r RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FY 1995/96 CITY BUDGET TO INCLUDE YEAR 1 BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL COMMERCE ALLIANCE APPROPRIATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $956,536 WHICH INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF THREE INTERIM FULL-TIME ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend the FY 1995/96 City Budget by adding thereto Division 262 thereby including the Year 1 Border Environmental Commerce Alliance appropriations in the amount of $956,536, including the addition of three interim full-time administrative positions as follows: YEAR 1 BECA PROGRAM BUDGET FUNDING SOURCES PROGRAM OBJECT DESCRIPTION CTCA EDA CDBG REVENUE' TOTAL G!AI\D lUfAL Staff Services': 5101 Salaries 0 $ 98,424 $ 29.160 0 $ 124,922 5103 Overtime 0 1,591 0 1.591 5141 Retirement 0 13.264 4.048 0 18.346 5142 Employee Benefit Plan 0 11,200 5,450 0 17,750 5143 Medicare 0 1,400 454 0 ~ $164,991 Specialized Contract Services:' 5203 Contract Services $ 91,050 507,833 0 80.007 678.890 BEBC Development Fee' 0 0 0 60.000 60000 738,890 5221 Travel 0 $ 2.000 $ 2,000 5224 Training 0 857 0 $ 1,143 2,000 5398 Capital Outlay IFurniture) 0 $ 5,000 0 0 $ 5,000 5271 Computer/Copier/Fax Leases 0 19,655 0 0 19.655 5301 Office Supplies 0 900 0 0 900 5212 Printing and Binding 0 800 0 0 800 5218 Postage 0 500 0 0 500 5252 Telephone 0 1,800 0 0 1,800 5399 Program Reserve 0 0 0 $ 20.000 20000 ~ $ 956.536 //-5- 1(,/ ---------------------..--------- --------------------------- -----------------------._- ----- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the three interim full-time administrative positions are as follows: Job Title Salarv Ranqe Job Description BECA Director $54,350-66,081 Attachment C Contract Manager $27,851-33,862 Attachment D Administrative Assistant $23,899-29,050 Attachment E Presented by ~J--.~~/ Chris Salomone, Director of Bruce M. Boogaar , City Community Development Attorney liMO) c:\wp51\doeumentlbeea.bud (June 22,1995)] ENDNOTES: 1. Program Revenue is projected income from BEBC rental fees. corporate sponsorships, and. potentially, client fees. 2. Staff Services refer Q!!]y to 1_00 BECA Director, 1.00 Contract Manager, 1.00 Administrative Assistant, I.E. the three BECA interim City personnel. Each position is budgeted to allow hiring up to "E" step. IOther BECA personnel are covered under Specialized Contract Services, which pertains to contracts for administration of the BETRC and BEBC programs.) 3. Specialized Contract Services refer to the contracts for administration of the BETRC and BEBC. These respective contracts cover ~ costs associated with the two programs including personnel and operating costs- (Note: the contract with Southwestern College fo, administration of the BETRC was approved by Council on June 20. 1995.) 4. BEBC Development Fee refers to: 1) $50,000 per the existing agreement with the California Business Incubation Network (CBIN) and Business Cluster Development (as previously approved by Council) for the development of the BEBC, fund- raising, and interim BEBG administration (this $50,000 fee will be paid exclusively from fund-raising proceeds generated by the contractors); and 2) $10,000 for additional proposed services from Business Cluster Development IBCD) related to statewide Environmental Business Cluster networking per a future contract. //,¿, I (7( -~ , (, .,; --------",~----------._---- - -------------~----- Attachment A I * ~ - .~ a if ~",«: 'Po... "E.$I c;.6 IJ "t! « 5'"E ~ g'~ .6 11] ~ § l; ~ &J.!!! Ó u«: ~ 8 "" ~II. oJj m ~ m ~ ï3.:J ~ 60 . cr . ~ Q H rz:I::i!f-< . . . . . . '5 c '" 0 u ... Õ ~ ~ ~ ... .,-i : b ~ ä of! i 3 j~~ ~ : ~ ~ rz:If-«<: c.ð ~ ~ ~ 0 § ~ .. .,-i LL YO Po ~ « YO of! ;¡¡ t ~ ~.~~1 ~' .. YO ;::j::¡ Q «: ~ % ~ ~ - YO U 8" "" ~,~ & ~ J.~~ * ""J¡~ JI, 7 . - -- .---.---- - -~----_. ;' i-:::"? ATTACHMENT B BECA STAFF COSTS BECA POSITION COMPARABLE CITY POSITION SALARY SALARY BENEFITS AT "A" AT "E" AT "A" BECA Director 54,522 66,081 14,983 Economic Development Manager Contract Manager 27,551 32,862 9,490 Administrative Analyst I Administrative Assistant 23,899 29,050 9,078 Administrative Office Assistant III IIMOI "'w'.'\d"'~""<14...'. IJ"~ 22. 19..11 / I, g/ ._~--~_._-_._.._._-_._---- ---------------------_._-~------- -,,------- , . ty 01 ~~ PmolllldDeputtocm ""I ~.. . 276 FounhA_ue ø . CwlaVlrto, CA 91910 . . (619) 691- . Announces An Employment OPPOrtunity IJ..!.I..-. e II BORDER ENVIRON"'ENTAL COMMERCE ALLIANCE DIRECTOR HOURLY: $28.13 $27.44 $28.81 $30.25 $31.77 BIWEEKLY: $2090.98 $2195.54 $2305.31 $2420.58 $2541.61 NOTE; The Border EnvIronmental Commetce Alßance Director position WIll be gnont funded for ~ """"mum of 3 yeara end.. such WID be unclassified (AT-WIll). The posllfon has a generous benefit package. tHE posmOtf The Border EnvIronmental Commerce Alliance DIrector Is an Interim employment position which Works out 01 the City'8 Community Development 0e>8IIm8nt end PØIfonns hlg/1'Y professional admInIstratIve !asks InvoMng the development end Implementalfon of the Border EnvIronmental Commerce Alliance Program and rel8Ied environmental technology business end IndU8lry development actMtJes. This program Is gnont funded lor a period of three y88l8. THE DUTlEI¡ - ThIs position reports to the Community Development Department's Economic Development Manager and Is I'8SponslbJe for OV8I8ee/ng a feci...., Economic Convwsion Gnont along with staff suP8Ms/on end training. Addllfonal I'88ponsibllllfes Include: contract adrnlnlst1auon: program budgeting end accountIng; monnorlng þrogr8ms end I8porIfng InfonnatJon to 8pþrOprfat. governmental agencies: overseeing contracts with the 'BErRO' and the 'BEBC' (s.. above explanation) sulH:ontractors; monnorlng performance and accounting procecures; implementing a Memorandum of Understanding with the San Diego Economic Adjustment Program end the Ca/Ifomfa RegIonal Technology AllIance; developing formal and Informal working reletJonshlps with all 'BECA' partn- (InclUdIng such groups eo the Small Busln... Developmentllntemational TredeAdmlnlstration, the -Callfomla EnvIronmental Technology Center. the Callfomla EnvIronmentaf Busln... Council, and the Business EnvIronmental Assistance Cent.., OV8I8ee1ng the development and Implementation of an environmental buslnesa outreach plan; COOrdinating the development of a long range plan for 'BETAO' and 'BEBC' thai enables self-sufflciancy as .non-protIt organizations; also p8lfoims solicitations of corporate Sl'O/l8Or8hlps and grants; institutes clIent fees end seeks other financial 8Upport vIa privata consultant spot'l8OrshJps and other related duties. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS Ira/nino and Ex""".n~ . Any combination equivalent to completion of a bachelor's degree In public admInistration. bus/nesa admInIstration or a rel8Ied field, and live yeers of Increasingly responsIble experience In govemment or the private sector. Highly Desirable: Masters Degree and knowledge of specific economic development In the areas of defense conversIon technology transfer. business planning and developmen~ and env/ronmentallndusby technology, goods, products and selVlces. Knowledae Skills and Abllnl8.! - Knowledg. of the fundamentals of public admInistration, supervIsion, communicatIons and presentation skills. economic development policies and programs; Intergovemmental COOrdination; ability to establish and maIntaIn PubRC/prfvate sector PartnershIps; Provide staff support to various boards and commissions; adminIster grants end contracts; and skills In program planning. budgeting. grants, contract monnorlng end reporting. ESSENTIAL DUTIES ThIs posllfon requIres sulllclent ability to read. analyze. Interpret and wrIte hIgh level reports. A person In thIs posllfon must be able to communicate effectively end attend meetings at various locatIons on behalf of the Border EnvIronmental Commerce Alliance; and us. typical office equipment, materials and supplies. Ucense¡Certlficatlnns . Must possess a valid Calnomla's Driver's Ucense or the ability to obtain one 81 time 01 appointment. EXAMINATlOt.f Those candIdates whose resumes and appllcatfons IndIcate education and experience most directly related to the position will be Invited to participate In the selection process. CLOSING DA~ - Applicatfons will be accepted until 5:00 p.m., Friday, April 21, 1995. RECRUITMENT NUMBER - ... ,..' -":'- _PUBUSHED UC/259 >,'r,,:-, \.:~, ::.'...."""( ','.' 4/4/95 Wj,ARE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER J/ - 7 Job Hotline: (619) 691-5095 ~------- - Employment infonnation and employee benefits AII_--..~...--.bJ«t.."".",...,...,.¡~ F__or_øf_"'I-....m " - "" ~ --- Þ- ".. ~ ", or ..,..". Þ- - 1M '"""'- ., do/, ""'""" do - ......... .. ...- or -- - .,.¡ .... '"""'- -- .. do/, ....... ..., " -/lid or """"'-4"""-'" Empw,ø Process Salary Tho SoIuy ...... tor ... poo""'" 10 ....... ... ... Appllutfou """"",., ~ bullellL CudIda"""-UY """"""""ote."""""""", SoIuy.......... ... a_... ... - ... -- .......... -a Tho aa, '" 01... VIote """ - ............ tor """'al'" ........... a_lII8)'be -..... -"""""""'."""L AII"'--.. -....aftor""""""""lbInIltOpafte,....,... --..,.. a ell'applJca""""""- k.,1IIa1lDq :¡"=:IIo~ ~ =:.:aa...~"'~ - ne""""""I1IoICIJ-"'IIIa........... - be ........... .... ilia _doo - be ...... ..... 10 ........ EJ>Jmlnattou Hø1úlap ..... - ......,... - II paid IoofidayJ ..',.... y-.......... will be ..- .. .-",.,."" =.~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~\'"= - ilia -.Joo. aporia- - ........ -- u _...IIIa"""""",---"1"""'" If,.,....., ......... --"""'-"'IIIa""-""'lII8)'be ""-""""""....--......- Sid IetzWI - ..- --. -"""""""U"*_dall...,....- Amn1ctuu with Dlsabfl/dø Ád (ADA) beaeØu ... -- tor ... De_I..-1 - ... a_-wet. A"*_",,,IIYa--. 'I1IÒ OIJ '" CIIaIa VIote will - -.. -- Ii> oR I\0Il."'" amploJoea. - .. ... """"""'- -.........., FIeJd1JIe BoM.ftt Pi4n a__UIoul___.......... 1b Thodlyolrena_.__tor_...,."... nq---.....-...-. -""""""---_tor no-. ...-..... Tho........., ""'"- 1118)' .... be - .. .......... a .... ..... '" -- be....... Tho be.... Ellgfbilfly Ilsú ........ ...... ., .......... oak. All -... - """'u6oJIr - oR ..-. '" ... Ufo insurtmco -"-"""""""'.JJaIbIIk¡oIllo. Tho ell' ..- ..... .... &le - tor .... Empløymmt prt1CIt/urø .- (....... dUten -... .. .......... -} SuppIO....... lite Ù>I""- 10 ...nable ., ..""" deducOaa " Depe..... ... ... -..... ............. 1118)' be -,..... -'" - '-"'I - '" a """"'...., Long linn disability insuranu --~""'-""¡lncIudea""" -(pftIOaccIooa..........udedJ. ...==.':':."~'"'"::::'~t~~;~ lI1np/IJymmIoUgfbilfly mt/IœIIon =W"':i".': .: C~::::- ........ ""'" ... Tho__wmbe........_-", .............--..."""..................... Rotl"""nt 1IIa""'""""-"",u_"",,, ""0.. ... -- tor fIoD.- .... ......... pan - I'robtttltIIIIlI7 1Irlød =- ~~':'":..=r--.... ~=-~...= AI-ad..-...,."........-"'"7- ~.. .. ... -., ......,. Relhenoe., ""'~ARS). ~""""'_,"'_'" .... a~poriod"'_,...(........tor...,."..... Soda! ~. ilia - '" Peaœ 0IIIc:e,} "'1IIa-- -"'IIIa-........ñad.IIIa._- POt71llJMnt 1Q11.lf"" IHnojiIs a_- --..........,..-pan- ilia ~":l:."":,=--6Io ...... Ia ..... - .. .... """'-IIIedpaol-- allbewm",... OIJ .......,. Employee Benefits FIeJdbIe S1Indlng Accounts (FSAs) ...0.. depeod... "8I,Ula.."" aad....... applicable "ou. The d~ oa.n roo .".. '" flexible S..-. """""to; heal.. .... FSAo aad de"",., .... FSAo. ~ Vacødøn aIJowol"..."',...Iu....,.doIJan""ltorœ be".. .... de........... -......... """'" - ,..ada.1e ...... ""'""- ...,."... ... .1i8Ib1e tor 10 "1I..1d -"-.--"-._be..O"""'" - tor - ....... roo.,.... ...pIoymeac; 1$ ..,....... ..........,.... -IS ,.... """"""'a. 20"""" dall """1IIa.6" Smoking poUcy aDd .-...., ,.... '" ..- (1118)' diJI'u ......... .. .......... -) - be..610 ... -- I.. PIn The CIy"'Cb'" v... bu a...,..., pcticy............ De..-..-.........I__a,.......- '-"laaUladlilies. -"...mù,.............- -to """. Do <14r"'CWo"* 10.. -..... -- - -_.. "'- "'- --.... - - --.- -.. """"."'-"--' ~{f? Æ~~ ~5=-~ CIlY OF ÇHUIA VISfA - j/-/t? ---------- - --------- -------- ----------------- - - --- -----~-~----- Cir¡ ~11~ Pmoane l)epanmw 276 Pounh A- CwI& VIm, CA 91910 (619) 691-$096 , tß. AnDounce, An -"""on, Oppottunity IJ--If "1:> II BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL COMMERCE ALLIANCE CONTRACT MANAGER HOURLY: $13.39 ' $14.06 $14.77 $15.51 $16.28 MONTHLY: $2,329.71 $2,448.18 $2.568.49 . $2,696.92 $2.831.78 NOTE: The Border EnvIronmental Commerce Alliance Director position will be grant funded for a maximum of 3 Y8818 and as such will be unclassified (AT-WILL). The position has a genetOl/8 benefit package. THE posmON This position works out of the Community Development Department and pertonna professional admlnlstralfve WOfk In the ..- of municipal II18/I8g8m8nI; budgeting; contract and grant admlnlatratlon, including )8/fonnance and IICOOUnUng 0Y8I8Ight, monitoring and I8pOIting of program parfonnance and perfonna related duties as assigned by tha Border EnvII'OI1IT18nta/ Commerce AllIance Director. THE DUTIEI This Is an Independent professional level position which assists the director In all phases of administration of the Border EnvIronmental Commerce AllIance program. This posnlon requires managerial and administrative skills and experience with contracts. grants and revenues as well as support staff supervision. Duties Include parfonnlng professional and technical public administratIon duties In assigned areas of the BECA program and n Is directly responsible for the administratIon of the federal Economic Development Administration and state Defense Conversion Grants (and other revenu. 8OUrces): reviewing budget llama; establishIng and reviewing budgeting and accountIng pract1ce8 and PfOC8dures; monitoring and I8pOIting program perfonnance: maJdng admlnJstndfve -mendatlona; ProvIdIng advice and assistance to 8ub<onlr8cto.. regarding program administration; negotiating and administering lIQI88menta with outside consultanta or contractors on an as needed basis; conducUng apllClal 81ud1es; prepare COIT8SPOndence; prepare grant related and City Council 18port8; assf8t In the preparation of public relations documents: lead the work of administrative 8UPport staff and other related duties as assigned. DESIRABLE QUALIFICAnONS TmlnlM and Emerlence - Any combination equivalent to completion of a bachelor's degree In public administratIon, business administration or a related field. and one, year of experience In professional administrative work of acceptable level and quality. Knowledae SklII8 and Abilities - Knowtedg. of public administration policies, practices, Procedures Including familiarity with budgeting. contractIng, accounUng and revenue applications: skills In analyzing complex data and documents; ability to use oral and written expression In the application of grant and contract administratIon techniques; ability to maintain effective relatlonahlp8 with all levels of staff; and an ability to supervIse staff, Use tact and diplomacy when Interacting with public and private sector organizations and the general public. ESSENTIAL DUTIES This position requires sufficient ability to read, analyze. Interpret and write reports. A person In this position must be able to communicate effectiveJy; attend meetings at VerlouslocatJons; and Use typical office equipment. materials and 8upplies Including a personal computer. Must po",ss a valid Calnomla Driver's Ucense at time of appointment EXAMINATION Thos. candidates whose applications Indicate education and experience most directly related to the position will be Invited to participate In the selection process. CLOSING DATE Applications will be accepted until 5:00 p.m., Friday, Apr1l21,1995. Interviews are tentatively scheduled In Mid-May t995 with placement effective July t, t995.. 1/-/ RECRUITMENT NUMBER DOCUMENT NUMBER", ..,"', PUBU~HED " '. """".:-"', '",' '<?';:..,::.", :'.'~ ' 4/4 95 UC/260 WE ARE AN. ~g~~.L °FlPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ! F '/ ---------.- --,---------- -- Employment information and employee benefits All-...... .",.."...... ""'i«t ., ""- """ ~ F.. - or- '" -Inf- MIl "-"'~--"'~lbtor_-- """""""-"""""""""'40_- .. -- or - - """ .."....... - .. "'" """"'" ..., .. ~ or -- - """"- Emplqyee Prøcess Salizry The ...... Ra... for ... "",1Iloo . ...... .. ... Applli:øtlmø ._..~........ """""""""- """""""'.10........,.- ......-... ... -""'" ... ..... GO ..- ......Iit. -- The co, '" ""... VIola ...,. -... -- for ....... .. ... ......." .. ........ - ... ......... .. ... --"'-- All_.",.,.... ........... oftcr ........ ... ... -.... oftcr -- ..... -.... . day oppIIooilaa ... .... k .., ... IIIIaa 01...,.."...... 'I1Ioreafto... uJor¡olacoaue 10 _led oftcr ........ n.""""""'iIIoIOoy_oIlhoopplleadoa -_0I1IIIolacIOry1Oftlco1Ullll"'..............0I... - ... -",Ied - ... app/Ioodoa - be I/ped. ..... 10 ......... EmmlntltWu Hol/d4y6 ..... - .- ....... 11 poId """" per,.... v_""""""""'-............w,....... ~ ~:t ~.."i.., s;:..:..= -"'-liao,""I"rioaœ""""""",~",u IleladGOIho""""""~-iIL II,......, ......... ---"'-01'" ""'qaaIiIod,"'_be taqeIrad .. _Ia-Io .., _M.", - .... ........ SlckktIN -- be::"':: =:r; ~2 D:*"=~~~ ÁIMt'IctItU WIth Dlsab1lJdø Ad (ADA) . '"".... - -I;. A Iict lea.. loco.... ........ 10 n. co, 01 CIIuJa VIola will ........ - avùleblo .. aU 1IdJ..... ......".... _10"'""""",___.. F1øIbk Ikuftt PI4n .--.......--.-.....--. To 1bedayolfon._...-_for_.- ----"'-' - - ...,. ..... ........ .....&01 ........ for ~... ...-..... 1be......... -- - .... be -.I .. ........ . - ..... 01 --...ao/Ita. 'I1ío be..'" EIlgtj1llq fIstJJ -- ...... ..,.......... "'¡L AI -- - -..... ... .. - '" ... Lq. Insurturcø - - ... pIaœd ... .. .1J&IbIUtr ... 1be ..., ..- ..... - Iita ""-uœ for - Empløymmt prøcødurø .mpIaooa (....... dUfen .......on, .. barpJaJq ....~ Supple....I8IM. inowuœ 10 8Y8Dab.. by ,.,... doducdco .. ~ .. ... -I&oodco, ......,.... - be -bien.... -...... - -cui """'Iloo 01 . ............. Long tørm dlsablllV luurtuu:. -..................,...............-,.............. ...... --.... ..... -udodJ. .,,==:::,"::u;;.-~.,t":~'1:: Emp/øynwnl.UglbUIV NrI/ktzdoIl ~"d= .: C":":,¡~ - If ,.. ... 1be_-"""'-"-_01 -....... or ........ -.iIaa .... at- ... IodMdaoI R.lÛYmmt "'!oJoI"""'-Io"'U_"'"" ""'1Ito ... ........ for 1IdJ..... ud .......... .... .... ProbatIiIIUII7 HrlDd <=r' ~~=..,~:..::r-... .::.~.= AI-"'"""""""""".",.-a,- ~ 10 ... Pub.. ....... ........... -..:s;.ARSJ. . ,....-.,. ...... 01- ,... (18 moo" for ...,."... Ia ~~pa"'I0""'_but_... .... ... - 01 ..... ()ft"...,~ AI...-cuI ............ 01... """"""1..riod.... .....,.. - PmtUlMlIt pœ1-tJmtI b.Mjfá '--l!Iœplloa:............-......... lho"='~~." ...... 10 ..... popcnioa '" ud aacIuoUIad - ..... " ... will """ CIy .......,. Employee Benefits Flo:lbk Sp.ndlng Aecounls (FSAs) Do..... do.." oa -""'Iloo'" cuneO! .ppIkab" "ou. The dlJ c/I'... IWo ..... '" F1mb~ Spo-. ^"",""Io; ""111 .... FSAI ... do....... .... FSAI. Th......... VIlC4ttoIl :::-:.:::.~ .:::-:,. -= ~for I'::':~= ..... - ......,... ... .Ii"", for 10 .." paid -""""""._"""'_._ho..."""'" -for_"""""""""'."""'" """duños bOIsaJaúos uaJL -.".... 01 ...,..,..... 20""""", durIq'" 1'" SIIU1ldng policy ... .-. ,.... '" ..- (..., dUfu .......on, .. .......... -) SItaIIu ........ ... .......... for fino ~~ ~ ~~'d:'~. =~ ~..c::: Do,.,...... "'-'"' _I buod - . '""....- -I;. ...,.. Do C/f"ew. "*10. ~- -.,..-.¿.. ...-. ...-,,- -."".,..... -"'-~"--"-""'-"- ~flt- Z~~-~ ¡¡f-:Æ~~ CIlY OF CHUIA VISTA. //-/e:2- --- _On- - --~---------------- --- ------ - .__--_n = City of lIaØ Peno""e! Dtpanmtnl 276 Fourth A...,... CuIIa V...., Co'. 91910 ~ kmcunœ. An Employm"" Opponunlty (619) 691-5096 Ilfl-, "E// BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL COMMERCE ALLIANCE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOURLY: $11.49 $12.06 $12.67 $13.30 $13.97 BIWEEKLY: $919.46 $965.44 $1013.71 $1064.40. $1117.62 NOTE: The Border EnYIronm_1 Common:e Alliance Dlr8ctor POSition WIll ba grant funded for a maximum 013 )'88ra and al luch WIll be unolallltled (AT.Wl14. Tha posltJon hel a ganerOUI benafit paokaga. THE POSmON Thla pooItJon -. out of tha Community Devalopment Department and perform a varf8ty of routIne to ve<y d/1lloutt and complax cIortoallupport for the Border EnvIronmintal Commarce Alliance DlrlClor and Contract Manager IUch.. typing. NO8ptlon, word procelllng, I8OOrd keepIng, IIIlng, mHtlng lOhedullng and related admlnillratlve IUpport work al "lIgned. THE DUTIES: Thla pOlItion P8rIormI admlnl8ll8tlva wort< which IUpportl otIIca and dlpartmanl ..llgnmanll for tha 'BECA' program: Thla POSition reporto dlractly to tha Border Envlronmantal Commarce Alilan.. DlrlClor In tha Community Davalopment Dapartmentand II relponllblefo""forml 01 oJ-I and admlnlatratlva IUpport luoh..: typIng CO"'"pondanca, reports, forma and lpectallzed documanll ralated to the functlonl of tha BECA from drab, notll, dlolaled tapel or brief Inatructlonl: proofing and checking typed documenll and other materlall: antarlng and retrieving data: preperlng reports from 01\01",. or p8/8onel computer lyataml: following ..tabllihed formato for preparing and updating a varf8ty of reportl and forma: performing calculaUonl: maJntalnlng recordl: P-Ilng forma (payroll. requllltJonl, purchale orda.., alc.); ntablilhing end maintaining ofIIc8 III..; ru"""'lng and compOlng information: reoaMog and I....nlng vfattora and Ielaphone calla: dlapanalng pertInent information for alloclaled BECA programl (Border Environmental Tachnology R..ource Canter and the Border Environmental BUIIn..1 Cluater~noubator) actlvltln and functIonal ravIawIng computOf reporto for 8OCUI8cy and making COIT8CIfona: 'operaUng ltanclard om.. equlpman~ opening and dls1ributlng mall; P-ling outgoing man, maintaIning fixed allat Inventory: ordering ofllO8 luppllea and performing relalad duties al elligned. DESIRABLE QUAUFlCATlONS Tllllnino and Ex..rlen.. . Any combination equivalent to graduaUon from high Ichootand four yea.. 01 gene,al clerical or ofIIc8 ..llltancellXpariance. HIghly d,,'rabla: Famillarllywlth pe..onal compute.. Including Microsoft and Wordperfect lo1twore. Knowfadoe Sklill and Ablllll.l. Knowfedga of oftIce pfOC8dur.. and typIcal clarlcal op.ratlonl: skIllIn performing detailed oJ_""lgnmento of varying compl8>Clly: composIng COITISpondenca: maintaining raco,dl and ftlas: making accurste mathamalfcalcalculatlonl: operating alypawriter and a Paraonal computa~ altablllhing and maintaining IfflCllva wo,king ralatlonlhlpa with stall, department cuatom.... and vlaOM. Ability to follow oral and written InstructIons: type accurately at a ral8 of 55 nat words per minute; and Priorftlze work and COOrdlnata multiple actlvltJ... ESSENTIAL DUTIES Thla POSition requlrH 8UIIIo/ent ability to read documanto and reporto and work from taped/dIctated notes and 10 follow oral and Wri!tan Inotructfonl. In addition. a p8/8on In thla posOIon mUll be able to communl..ta 8flactlvaly In pe..on and on the telaphone; - varioul omoa equipment, matarlall and luppllea (typawrller, pa..onel computer, facslmna machine, elo.) ule good Judgement when g,88tJng ltall and vlallo.. on tha telephone or In person. LJcan.elCertlftcatlona. Mult pollell a valid Cailfornla'i Drlva~. Ucanse or the ability to obtain one at tlma of appointment. A QW 'OF A TYPING CERTIFICATE OF AT LEAST 55 N W.P."1. DATED VilTHIN THE PAST 1W0 YEARS MUST BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH THE APPUCATION. ' EXAMINATION ThOla candldat.. whOle rllume. and appllcatlonllndlcata education and a"Perience most di,ectly related to Iho pos~ion WIll be invited to pert/oJpala In the selection procel,. , CLOSING DATE Appllcatlonl WIll be accepted until 5:00 p.m., Friday, Aprfl21. 1885. Intarvlews arelentatlvely lCheduled In mld.May 1885 WIth Placamonl affective July 1, f895. r RECRUITMENT NUMBER PUBUSHED //-/3 UC/261 .. 4/4/9S WE ARE AN,~,~~~.LOf'.PORTUNITY EMPLOYER --..------..---- Employment infonnation and employee benefits AlI- ........ .",.,...,.. -.,¡,¡ø,. -'-""""- F- -., --- '" --"'I"""'" "'" .. -/or.....-... -- Þ- "'" ~ .. ., ........ Þ-....,."... 77w - of dIU """'" 40 ... -- .. -- or..".. -"'... --" dIU """",...,.".....s¡W or -..- -... Employee Process Salary 1>0 ..... ...... for ... ......,. k ...... co ... Appllutto... e.....".... ~ _IlL CudIdatoo... - -....................,."...... .....-... """""""""""'-"-"""riI. -. 1>0 a., at 01'" YIota aaIy -,.. -- lor ....... .. ... lint otep, .. e..".".. ..." be -- to'" --""""aIIy...... AD_........,.. -""-.-"""-",p--- - -...... . dt)" appIIcallao ... .... ~ .,. "" mr., :"~~":7=:=at~ ...... na......,.....IIIotoI¡o_at...appllcallao _be"""""""""'-_be-, ..... k ........ EXIImInatio... HolJdap "'...............,.."......... 11 paJdllollda"par_. Y-_wlllbe_to........,ll,....... =-~ ~:: ~.!:;Iy S;:"::"'Pa= ... ... -..... apadoaca -- ....... reqoIoo-.. - .. ... .....,..... ~Iy -IlL If,.. - ......... --.......-at"'--"'_be -"-""-'.'.,,----- Sid; kavø ---- . be:::::=~2';'~:=:ï~ Amerktuu wUh Dlsabllldø Ad (ADA) . '"'"'- _to A dot - ....".. -- k 1>0 a., at 0IaIa YIota will ....... - - to""""'" e.....,.... -10"'_- -............. FIøxJbk ~ PI4n '--"---t_..",,- 'Ib 1>0""'-, -.. Be- PIaa lor""""'"""", ---.....-...- "- - ....,. - ........ ........ -- lor Do- - "'-- no..................,.... be - .. ...- ..... ..... at_- be...... 1>0 be- Ellglblllq Ibø - ...... ... .......... - - AI - - --.u, - ... ..... at "" LIfe Insurturce -- ....... ... pIaood co .. .1IôbIIJty Dot. 1>odt)"P'"'Idea _Ie... Dfa......... lor..... Employment prøcødures e..".".. (_, diIre.. -I to .......... oaIt¡' .........,taI Ute ......... k _Ie ... """'" ............ Do"......, co ... -..... ...."."..... - be -...... -.......---....plellaoat.....,.......or Long term dlsabUlty IlISUI'tUU:e ---P'J'IooIook:aI""'_""""""""" ...... <-JaoaI ..... ududed). e~=.':':.Ie.~Iy~~==-~ Emp/IJymmJ .JIgIlJllIq Nr(fIœdøn =-:...":":::' .: C~:::- ........ If,..... ""'-""""""" be""'..- _at -.... .. ....... -- !Oat ..... ... - IlItlnIMnI """"""""-10...0_- -l1li... - for"""'" "'pe- part.... =-"""~Ite--= ~ period ~. ... put- ... AII.......-...........---.u,........... ~ç ~:'i:' ~~"'::' ..r~~ . -., period at_,.., (II -- lor...,..,..... Soda! -Iy. ... -... at ..... 0tIIc0t¡' At... -..tal """'J'Iallaoat"'-.,period,""e..".".......... p,f7ltllMnI ptU1-time beneftá .-- &eo""",, -"""".-part-limo ...Pa=':J::;.~o" ....... In dåecl- to "'-pooI-".....lhe..Uat...acy",.....,. Employee Benefits Flezlbk Spending Æccounå (FSAs) Be..O.. depeod.. -....... """'or '_Ie "'°0. 1>0 dly_- Iypea at....,ble """'1""""'" heallb .... FSAa .... depe"'" .... FSAa. """""'" Vacation :=-:.::-.:,~ '::':x..~ ~~':=: ""'" II1II-.... ...,..,... ... eU8lbla for 10 ...,. paid Iaooooeby""""""""lazablelaooooe- Thkbe..lk......by - b - ....... """"""""""" .,...,. durloa .......... - """"'" at.......",..", 20~...,. d"""" 115ØI Smoldng policy ... .-.. ,..,. at ....... (ma, dô1fu -.... to ......... -) - be..1111 ... - for FIro ~":::~~='=i~~ De-"_pe.....,.lbued........."",,- -to aaIy. n.C1!r<fCWo -..-----...-........,-. ---. -"'-"""""'or_-"_or""'.........,- ~{ft. -'.-- ~"""'- -~~ ~~~::-- CIlY Of J/-)( CHUIA VISfA - ~..., ---- n___- ---~ --- --- - ----- no_____- ..--------- ----- --------- Attachmen~, J-nßrmaiion. memorandum May 8, 1995 TO: Tho Hooonb. "'"" "" Ci~.~ VIA: John D. Goss, City Manager~C; ~. FROM: Chris Salomone, Director of Community Development í. SUBJECT: Border Environmental Commerce Alliance (BECA) Recruitment Process I. PURPOSEIBACKGROUND On January 10, 1995, Council authorized staff to proceed to rcauit and hire budgeted staff for the BOCA program. The purpose of this memo is to advise you regardiug the ongoing process to tecmit and hire personnel in order.to meet our July I, 1995 opening date. BECA personnel will include the following: 1) City Interim Personnel (BECA Director, BECA Contract Administrator, Administrative Assistant); 2) Southwestern College Personnel for the Environmental Technology Resource Center (BE'fRC Manager, Cross-Border Environmental Marketing Specialist, Environmental Management Specialist, Environmental Busiœss Development Specialist (SO%), Seoior Project aedc, Project Oede); and 3) CBIN Peuoooc1 for the IDœbator (BBBC Mauagu-. BnviroumemaI Business DevdO{JlDeDt. Spec:Jalist (SO,,), AdmiuIstrativc - ( AssistautIOmc:c Mauagec), The job cfcscdptiœs for each of these ~ have been presœted to Council. -- , u. MINJMUM BDA REQUIREMENTs EDA requires at a minimum: . Notice/Advertisement in a daily vehicle of regional circulation for at least three days . Accept I!Pplications for at least 10 consecutive days . Report to BDA outlining the recruitment process including copies of the ads placed . Report to BDA outlining the top three candidate resumes and the rationale for the - recommended person for EDA concurrence prior to offering the position ID. Cl1Y PERSONNEL: RECRUfIMENT AND SELECl10N OF THREE ADMINISTRA'IIVE POSmONS .' Job announcemems were placed in the San Diego Umon Tribune and the Los Angeles Time, Orange County Edition. In addition IIIIIlOIlnœments have been distnòuted to various sources, including cities, counties, and state agencies, community-based environmental groups, and environmental businesses. The recruitment period for City personnel (only) closed on Friday, April 28, 1995. Applications will be screened by the Personnel Department with the assistance of the Community Development Department staff and the Environmental Resources Manager. Selected candidates will be interviewed by a panel of non-city employees. The Director's panel will include representatives of the San Diego Economic Conversion Program, SoUthwestern College Small Business Development Center, and the environmental industry. Following panel interviews, the fmal recommendation will be made by the Economic Development Manager and the Community Development Director. ,........- / //-/~ V' ------ -- -- ..----...------ - --.------------- --_.._------~-- ---- ----..-.---- - . -- - Border Envirorunental Commerce Alliance (BECA) Recruitment Process Page 2 May 8, 1995 IV. SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE PERSONNEL: RECRUITMENT & SELECTION OF BETRC STAFF Southwestern will establish an interviewing panel for the BETRC professional positions similar in composition to the panel for the BECA Director plus experts in each position's respective field, and representation from City's Community Development Department. Fmal reconunendations will be made to President Joe Conte. The interviewing panel for clerical personnel will include Southwestern College and Commwúty Development Department representatives. Final recommendations will be made to President Copte. . V. CBIN PERSONNEL: RECRUITMENT & SELEcl10N OF BEBC STAFF CBIN will hire two contract positions. including the BBBC Manager and the Office Manager. Again, a similar panel will be established for the Manager as for the BECA Director. with the addition of CBIN, aud with the final selection IiJadc by CBIN. the Community Development Director aud Economic Developmcot Manager. Fmal selection will be made b~ CBIN, Community Development Director and Economic Development Manager. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. 1bank you. ~ Caw...,.. Do IfJS - . . .,;¡- /1- / ¿" -.------ - - .,-__,___m_,__- -- -----.---- - - ---~~-.,-- Attachment G r ! H Ji q q H ,..., III ~Iirfi II rll,'ffffIJfflflllJ'JIJlll,11 f'II"1 III ¡fllrl' I r f flf lf~1 f Fr ( If I ,- 'f rlll'l rr "Ir'lf I f ~ ~p _I f- f I! I! f" f !t I ~I ItS ~ ~ ~ il i - f f J l~H f !J~' ð' rL~u f f r ~~- ! hi OJ "¡II 9 r! ~" .. LB 1 ~~ ~ ¡¡Sf ~l ~ if B Iii iiiiHBHHh~HH~Hf ~B IB aH~ ~ B( g I h n ~ - 1~~i~.~~a¡ß Q f r. ..., p en f I Ii ~ ~Ë~~ Q ~ * ¡ g"-- :::::: . I q I I i Ii I¡iïiiiiíi€~§iíi.~~iiii~ii ~s~ã~ii I~~ ~i~~~ ~ ~~~~ [ I i ii I iiiii€~§iíi ~~iililii iff i~~ i~~~i ~ ~~iìf ~ n . I ~~ .- = ~ct"~ sEe ":! z=c..*g ; ~f ~ i HH ? " Q -1 ~ ii I ï iiiii€~§iíi.~~iiiilii fi~~¡ilf i~~ i~~~i ~ ~~ii en ~, ~ ~ ¡ ~ " ~ ii I iii~~i~¡15i riiiiilii ¡if g~~ ;~~~I ~ ~~I c- n ~ ~J:¡¡M ê P ~ U:h I .0 ;:;: n V> 5: ~'c-. Q ¡ .h¡; : r ~ ii I ï iii¡~i~ii5i.¡iiiiilii ~i¡~iif g~~ ;~;il ~ ~~Ii B: ~p ~ Ii IiI ii~€~~f~~i~ii¡i¡iii;~il ~II ~~I ~~~~; I ~~~ ~ n¡ ~. 1~~hHïB n þ ~ i ~ ¡Hi ~ !~r ~ Ii 1¡liii¡€~~f~~i~ii¡~¡iiii~il ¡~ii~11 ~~i ~~~~; i ~~~i :E V> Q (') ri- <= Q Þ I ", V> ri- en -c ..., Q ::5 ~ ~~? - ----------..-------------------------- -------______M- ------------------- ------------------- THIS PAGE BLANK //-1 r - -- - ---------------------- ------------ --------------- ------- ------------- Attachment H r II r[ f~ ¡ ! ~f [J~tr r~Jf{fi'~t~f!I~¡ ~rrr f(J ~ ~ ~f [EIgr rfl~l r i ~ 1 t~~~ Jfi ~ * g 1~ ~fl~f I 'II ~ 8' [[ii t'ai ~ ~ ~ ~I r f\ß 0 °r8 ~ttt ¡ 8 m ~jj 1I,:p.~f '\I ' !"""~ t.C .. .:: it '"'JI. i. "'Ill! c: U'> if I~~ g. l~~'a ~ ri- .¡.¡ . ~ .. -;:: .... ~ "..ii ii ~~~ ~ 0 fIrr if -$ ~ ~ ê ~ ~ w - ~ w ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~iii88iiè:~iii§~ €i"rl- '" .[ ¡;> ¡;' ~ ~ ~~\1~ - "'tA SoR- e- ~~t:~;~:2~~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~- .g- u: ~ tj.to'."'.'" i: ~ U. ~ ~ 8S~~ '" ri- m lili88i~è:~il§§¡ ~s~g ~ 1t .I;j . . "' .to' fl .to' .to' ~ ~ 888§ è:~~g§~ '" ¡;> ¡;' ~ t ~tJ_-~ tA SoR- . .~."':- "' .~ . .<> ~ ~Ë~~¡U~ ~ ~ 10: ~ .to'."'."'." !:! U. c+ tH~& 8- e- m ::> ~ .I;j . . "' t fl.to'.to' .to'."'."'!" ~ § 888§ è:~~g~§ ~~~& ~ ~ ~ I;j - !" w tA.to'.to' ~ ~ ~ ~e8~ ~~~~~~ m ~ ~:;¡!p:;;: $ :;;: ~[ ~ "g~~~~ ': ~ ~ 10: ¡;' .to'.'" ~.<> ~ U. J. ~ ~ tj ¡;¡ '" '" I;j - !"wtA.to'.to' .to"""'<> Þ 2 ~.~a ~2~222 ~~w~ ri- ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "' ~ tj N ri- ~ ~.~"'-~~"'~~-~"'"'~ ; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ f $!:f8:~ww~",e; ~[¡ ~ ~~~~~iã!~i ~ tj ~ õ:;; Ii( ~ f '; ~ !!~~§ I: I '"' IT1 "' W W I;j W ~ --N :::5\111"[ ~ iii~tiii~~~~§§§ ~~i¡ ~~~~ -s '" ::> 0 ~ //'/~ ---- - --, ----_u -,,--------- --______m-- -- -----,----- - - ---__--___n---- THIS PAGE BlÄNK J/-~ -"---- - ---------"------ Attachment I I r ~ Ii r~ ~~ ~ ~¡f 'U ~ PPffHfHHfIK~ ~I ~ffIJI~ ~ I.! If I f I ¡fl t~ fl' Inllil ~ ~~I ~fi ~; ~ ~ f r g '"11 !~~ ~ I. f f.ff. W If II J ilt ~ [-II! I!iï ~ flrf J~ f to -< ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ w w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-wœ~.~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~t~ ~ t- ð 8 t $ S œ ~ ð ð ð ð 8 ð ~ ð ð ð ð 8 0 ~ ~ 8 8 ~~,~~~~ ~[ ìif ~ š! ¡¡¡Hi '0: ~ ~ Ii- ~ if i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~w~w~ ~R i ii¡~~~ti¡iiiiiii Ii ii~ii ¡~ -< ~ ~~~~H~~~~ ~~ ~~$~P ~ ~ § t š š! ~ § ~ § § 8 § 8 § § § § = ~ ~ = ~ ~ . . I: ~ [ ;¡.w.~þ E.e: íHai§¡;~~ ~ if ~ if i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~W$~~ ~R i ~ tš~!~§¡i§ii~ii §§ ~~~~¡ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~. ~ J ~ ~~~~H~~~~ ~~ ~~~1.H ~ W § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ š § ~ 8 § 8 § § § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ i[ t! .; 8 ¡UH ~ i i i .i ~ ~ ~~~~H~;~~ ~~ ~~~1.Þ ~Q § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ 8 § 8 § § § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I .... . -~ ~ ~.~w \*;;; ;¡œœ:;::;; ~ ¡ ~ .... ~HH~..~..H.""""~~~ ,.'" . ~~"'H H § 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 e § ~ 8 § § § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ i[~ ."'~.~~""~$ ~ fS¡;J¡;! § !:! iU ~ if ii .... ~ ,~~ ~. ¡ ~ ~~ ~HH~;~~~~~~~~ 1-~ ~~;1.~ ~Q § ii 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Š 8 e § ~ 8 § § § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I /I-~I ---- --- --_._------,--------, --- ---- --- -,,----------,- .. - ----- --- ------------ THIS PAGE BLANK / /- .2)" ----------- -- -- ----- - - - ----- - -------- -- Attachment J r f It ~~ ~ iì' ,;¡ ! fl i[ ~ Jlrrf[IfJlffJ!I!~f( f[~ ~ i If II ¡ if! f!U ¡lrlfF flf .~ ~ ~ r rl iì' r f!- f f f g 6' ~ ~ i I ~ f I i 8 i g; ri ~ 8' i: fl t ] ... ... i 'al ~~!! f fIff ~ - N - N - W ~ ~ ~ ~ w - ~. ~ w 0 ~ - -. ~ - ~ ~ ~ - I!! 0 Ii! ~ ~ § ~~~i~~~g~~§§§§~~§~ §~~ ~- ~N~~ -I:i ~[ J,';~~.", ~$î ~::¡ ~ ~ i!:- ~ ~f t ~ ~~~J"'~~~I!!J"'-~~~~~~~~~ 8 t~~~~~~~8~~8888og88 - N - N WW~ ¡~ .~ ~J"'.~",.w."'t:t:¡;;...~~.~.~.~~.o t.o.'" "N g ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ 8 888 g 8 g 8 g g 8 8 ~ ~ ~~~g ~~ ~[ ~NW~ ~~ W - ~ '" .. 0 Ii' ¡¡: ~ ~~ t i ~ iii~¡~~~~iii¡i~il - W - N NN~ ¡~ ~ J"'~~J"'J"'J"'-t~~~~p~~p ~-~ "w 8 ¡t~t;~e~8888g8888 ~~~ ~-~~ ~~ ~[ i~t~ ~~ Ii' ¡¡: ~ ~~ t i ~ ¡~~i~~ë~~iiiiiiil ~ ~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~ õ 80. W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 õ õ õ õ ~ 0 õ õ ~E~,:J j¡}3 :;: w.. ~ ~ ¡; W W ~ - W ~ ~ ~f ~ N . i . i i~~~~~~~ê~š~~ii~~il i~~~ / /-.23 ----------- - ------- -- ------~---._---__~__~n_._____.__._-_._------_._. ._~-----_.... COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /:2- Meeting Date 6/27/95 ITEM TITLE: 1/. Resolution /79J/£' Supporting the proposal to fund the San Miguel Connector from Transnet Funds as a scaled down project subject to it being constructed in accordance with the schedule for SR-125 South Section and subject to the SR-125 Sweetwater section being constructed in accordance with adopted Plan of Finance. ß Resolution /? 9 ¥?Supporting the efforts of California Transportation Ventures to Construct SR-125 Between SR-905 and SR-54. SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: City Manage~~ t (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX) Funds are not expected to be adequate to n ct the entire regional highway system under the Transnet Program. This could mean that the San Miguel connector between the Toll Road and SR-54 will not be fully funded. SANDAG is considering options to deal with the funding shortfalL California Transportation Ventures (CTV) (The holder of the franchise for the Toll Road) has request the opportunity to address the City Council concerning the SR-125 Toll Road between the US/Mexican border (SR-905) and SR-54- RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolutions supporting the current SANDAG Plan of Finance and supporting the construction of the Toll Road by CTV in a timely manner. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: When the voters of San Diego County approved Measure "A" in 1987, (1/2 sales tax for Transportation), the ballot documents described the regional highways that would be constructed with the funds. The SR-125 San Miguel connector to SR-54 was in the program. Also, there was a statement that if additional funds became available the money could be used to build SR-125 South. Chula Vista City Council was very concerned with Measure "A" and considered not supporting it However, with the efforts of then Mayor Cox, and former Councilman Malcolm, the SANDAG Board modified the documents to provide for the San Miguel connector and the ability to spend additional funds for the south portion- Other than that and the SR-54 project, the South Bay got very little from Transnet The point is that the San Miguel connector is a very important element in the Transportation Plan for the South Bay, (including Chula Vista and Otay Mesa). This is a vital transportation link whether or not the Toll Road is built early- /;¿~I ----_____"0_________0_____- ---------- ---~--_.._----- Page 2, Item I:J- Meeting Date 6/27/95 It was several years after the SANDAG Measure "A" was approved, that the legislature provided a law to allow Caltrans to build 4 projects as toll roads. In 1991 a franchise was given to CTV for the SR-125 Toll Road. Since the franchise was issued, it was intended that the Priyate Toll would be between SR-905 and San Miguel Road (approximately), and the public portion of SR-125 would start at San Miguel Road northerly to SR-94. SR-54/SR-125 SAN MIGUEL CONNECTOR CTV' s intent is to open the first 4 lanes of the Toll Road between San Miguel Rd- and SR-905 by 1998 or 1999. The 1994 Plan of Finance had funding for the San Miguel Connector as a payback to CTV beginning in 1999 for a period of 10 years. CTV would build the interim interchange for a cost of approximately $60 million. In order to secure financing CTV needs a fIrnl guarentee from SANDAG that monies will be available for ten years- SANDAG financial advisors are concerned that such a guarentee could limit future funding options for other TransNet projects. SANDAG is concerned that the proposed design of the Tollway will not have on/off ramps at San Miguel Road- Spokespeople for the Bonita Valley residents do not want on/off ramps on existing San Miguel Rd. Therefore it is possible that the first off ramp for south bound traffic from SR-54 would be at East H Street, which would require a tolL Chula Vista staff believes that the above concern of paying a Toll on a SANDAG segment would be valid if there were adequate funds to build the entire system. However, there is not adequate funding for the entire Highway program, other sources of funding, including Tolls on SR-125, and other segments of the Regional Highway system should be considered as sources for additional funding to complete the system- CTV has indicated that in order to make the Tollway financially feasible the SR-125 Sweetwater section between SR-54 and SR-94 needs to be constructed- Complete connections to SR-94 west are not planned until 2001 and SR-125 north and SR-94 East not until 2003- Chula Vista staff would support keeping this project in the plan of finance and moved up if possible. This segment of SR-125 has been a congested roadway for many years, prior to much development in the areas north of here. Because of Right of Way requirements this project could not be built before year 2000. At best the schedule shouldn't slip- FUNDING SHORTFALL & SR-52 (Santee) The City of Santee had requested that SANDAG move the easterly portion of SR-52 ahead in the schedule to soften the impact on Santee of SR-67 traffic driving on local streets in Santee to get to SR-52. Phase one of SR-52 has recently been completed between SR-163 and the western portion of Santee. Phase II is nearing the construction phase and will end at SR-125 (yet to be built). The last phase (between SR-125 and SR-67) will not be built until 2007. This would be one of the last projects in the current Transnet program. If this project were put ahead of another project, the delayed project would likely not be built due to funding shortfalls. The funding shortfalls are a result of a combination of forces: 1) lower sales tax revenue than expected; 2) lessor amount of State funding for regional highways; and 3) higher costs for the individual projects. The attached Transnet Subcommittee report lists the impacts on the highway program under several scenarios. 1;2 -,;l... ,'-7 '.,i, t -------- ------ -- --------_..---~--- Page 3, Item / J... Meeting Date 6/27/95 The San Miguel Connector is currently in the SANDAG plan of finance listed as payments to CTV over a ten period between 1999 and 2008. CTV would build the facility and get reimbursed from Transnet. However, if the program funding dries out early, CTV would not get reimbursed. The Transnet Subcommittee report discusses the status of the Transnet Highway Project Schedules and a proposed agreement by CTV to advance the funding for the San Miguel Connector, but not at full funding. SANDAG and CTV staff are making further efforts to address the concerns of the subcommittee. RATIONALE AND IMPACTS IF SR-125 CONNECTION NOT BUILT It is also very important that the segment of SR-125 between SR-54 and SR-94 be build within the SANDAG plan of finance by the year 2003. Without this link, the transportation plan and the funding scenario for the Toll Road may not be successful. Staff believes that funding must remain for this connector project and SR-125 (Sweetwater) for the following reasons: GENERAL PLAN This north/south facility is the only major facility east of 1-805 that will traverse through Chula Vista between Otay Mesa and SR-54- The General Plan for Chula Vista bases the success of the traffic analysis on the construction of a north/south facility for the ultimate buildout. BONITA ROADS If the San Miguel Connector is not built, then the Traffic will have to snake through rural Bonita roads to get to SR-54. Traffic studies have indicated without the connector and Freeway/Tollway traffic on the local roads will greatly increase. The connector will allow northbound trips to the northeast of Chula Vista to avoid the Bonita Streets and yet not have to go 15 miles out of direction. ECONOMIC DEV. The commercial and business growth opportunities provided for by the City's General Plan in the Eastern Area is critical to the City's future economic stability. SR-125 provides critical transportation service to this area. The Chamber of Commerce has recognized this fact by previously stating that SR-125 is an important factor in attracting new jobs to the Eastern Area. FUNDING This connector is really a leverage of public funds in the ratio of 5 to 1 to provide for a road system. Otherwise, for $60 million of public funds, the region ends up with a transportation facility worth $300 million. The ability of private enterprize to build and finance a $300 million road in a developing area is risky and difficult to accomplish- There is the possibility that CTV may not be able to fmance the project on their original schedule. It could be constructed later as a toll road or much later possibly as a freeway- In any event, the connector is needed by the year 2000, to connect the northeasterly eastern area traffic without traversing through the rural Bonita Roads. /;¿~ J --.------ - ----___m - -- ---- ---~----------___m___- Page 4, Item /)...... Meeting Date 6/27/95 Without some major funding changes to the State Transportation Program, there will not be available funding for SR-125 South for many years to come. Even though all local parties would like a freeway instead of a Toll Road, the real life financial future is that a freeway is not a short term accomplishment. CTV PRESENTATION CTV and Caltrans staff will be making a short presentation on the needs and benefits of the Toll Road and the status of the environmental process. There will also be a 4 minute video on the automated toll collection booths- Attachment "B" is material distributed by CTV and Caltrans for your review prior to the meeting. STAFF MEETING WITH SENATOR PEACE City staff, along with the City Consultant, will be meeting with Senator Steve Peace on Tuesday June 27 to discuss some of his concerns with the Project. Staff will be able to orally cover items discussed in that meeting- FISCAL IMPACT: The total fiscal impact could be very high if the north/south facility is not constructed. Hundreds of millions of dollars of construction, development, and jobs could be jeopardized if the connector and Toll Road is not build on time. The specific loss to the South Bay is the potential loss of $60 million from Transnet funds. The loss of the Toll Road is well over $200 million. JPL m:lhome\ongmeorlag""da'M12S".jpl Attachments: A-SANDAG Transnet Subcommittee Report B-Material for Presentation ).;J. -( 1'16 -------------.------- - __m______->--- ------- ----------- >- -> --------~------------------- . ~ ~ San Diego ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Suite BOO. FI"'t Inte",tate Plaza 401 B Street San Diego. California 92101 (619)595-5300 Fax (619)595-5305 MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA TRANSNET SUBCOMMI'ITEE Thursday, June 8, 1995 1:30 p.m. SANDAG Board Room - 8th Floor Access 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 Staff Contact: Eric Pahlke lIEM..l 1. Election of Subcommittee Chair The position of Chair is currently vacant. In accordance with the Subcommittee's procedures, a Chair is elected by a majority of the voting members present. A copy of . the "Membership and Functioning" memorandum, explaining how the Subcommittee generally functions, as well as the latest membership 1isting are attached. Action: Election 2. Status of TransNet Highway Project Schedules (Eric PahI1œ) The 1994 TransNet Plan of Finance anticipated the completion of all major highway projects prior to the end of the sales tax program in 2008. This plan was predicated upon various assumptions regarding the level of state and federa1 fiDancial support. The schedules identified in the 1994 Plan have been reviewed in light of the statewide transportation funding shortfall discussed at the last meeting of the Subcommittee. SANDAG staff will present several funding/scheduling alternatives. Action: Discussion /02 ~ s- MEMBER AGENCIES: Cnles of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, EI Cajon, Enclnltas, Escondldo, Impel1al Beach, La Maaa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista, and County 01 San Diego. ADVISORYILIAISON MEMBERS: Calffomia Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Defense, S.D. Unified pon DIstrIct. and TijuanalBaa Callfomla. II ___m,_____-- .o- m______------, ------------------------- . 3. Route 125 San Miguel Connector (Eric Pahlke) The 1994 Plan of Finance includes funding for an interim Connector to the tollroad being planned by the California Transportation Ventures (CTV). The Plan envisions a lO-year reimbursement to CTV for the CoDIICCtor if they built it with their tollroad. The statewide funding shortfall and other issues must be resolved before this reimbursement approach can be fmalized. CTV has asked that Route 125 Sweetwater be opened to traffic by no later than 2001. In addition, CTV has offered to accept a lower payment for the Connector if it is made earlier. SANDAG staff will present its lIIIlysis of these alternatives. CTV will be available to discuss these issues as well. ,...\cdon: Discussion /1;.-::'-".' ".;::" -- ;' ~~ Tráusportation Consensus Project (Craig Scott) ,;.- -0--. - !~ - The Finá1 RepÍ:>rt of the Transportation Consensus Project (copy enclosed) was released . -- . in,February. 1995, This project was a joint effort of Californians for Better Transporta- , ". bon, regionalplanning agencies, such as SANDAG, and other transportation agencies statewide. The report provides background information on trends in transportation and ; funding, -outlines the needs for future funding, and proposes institutional and regulatory reforms. Action: Information 5. Applications for Cycle 7 of the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program (Eric Pahlke) The deadline for submitting applications for Cycle 7 is June 30, 1995. Staff will present the list of projects which should meet the June 30, 1997 deadline for construction contract award for this cycle of the SLTP Program. Action: Approval 6. Other 7. Public Comments and Communications (Speakers limited to three minutes each) This agenda Is sent to all rqular memben of the SANDAGIRTC Board of Directon for Informational purposes. 2 /;2--þ --- ---------- -------------------------- ---------------- --------- -------------------------- ------------ ------ Agenda Item #1 ~ San Diego ASSOCL\TIOX OF GO, "ERX~IEXTS Suite 800. For.. Interstate Plaza 401 B St'eet May I, 1995 San Diego. Calilo,nia 92101 (originally issued May 29, 1992) (619)595-5300 Fax (619)595'5305 TO: TransNet Subcommittee FROM: Eric Pahllce Manager of Highway Engineering and Project Development SUBJECT: Membership and Functioning The Subcommittee provides oversight for the major highway and transit projects funded under the TransNet Program and advises the SANDAG Board of Directors on major policy-level matters. Areas of interest include project schedules, costs, and scope. The Subcommittee assists in the preparation of the TransNet Plan of Finance as well as other regional programming efforts. Recommendations of the Subcommittee are forwarded to the Board of Directors for action. The Subcommittee generally functions as follows: Meetings The meetings are held on an as-needed basis, preferably on the fl1"St or second Friday of the month beginning at 8:00 a.m. Agenda SANDAG Staff prepares the agenda and mails it to the Sub- committee members one (1) week prior to the meeting. The agenda is also mailed to all regular SANDAG Board members prior to the meeting. Staff reports, if available, are included with the agenda packets of Subcommittee members. Appointment Subcommittee members representing East County, Nonh County Coastal, Nonh County Inland, and South Bay are appointed by the SANDAG Chairman/Chairwoman ftom the membership of the Board of Directors. The CbainnaniChairwoman will attempt to appoint some members who have overlapping assignments as members of the transit development boards. Appointees to the Board of Directors (regular and alternate members) for the City of San Diego and the County are automatically members of the TransNe! Subcommittee. /;l~? MEMBER AGENCIES: CitIes 01 Carlsbad, Chula Vista. Coronado. Del Mar. EI Cajon. Encini..s, Escondido. Imperial Beach,la Mesa, Lemon Grove, Nallonal CIty. Oceanside, Poway. San Diego. San Marcos, Santee. Solana Beach, VISta, and County 01 San Diego. ... ADVISORYILIAISON MEMBERS: Calilornia Dapanment of Transponation, U.S. Depanment of Defense. S.D. Unified Pon DIStrict. and TiJuanaIBaa Callfomla. [C('1 >. --->-------- --»--------------~----- . Chair/Vice Chair The Chair and Vice Chair are elected by a majority of Sub- committee members present. The Vice Chair conducts the meetings in the absence of the Chair. Attendance Regular and alternate members are encouraged to attend all meetings. Quorum Four Subcommittee members (either regular or alternate) representing different areas constitute a quorum. Voting Regular members vote on all Subcommittee actions. Alter- nates vote only when their com;sponding regular member is absent. A majority of regular and eligible alternate members voting constitutes approval. Ex-Officio Members The District Director of the California Department of Trans- portation (Caltrans) District 11, the General Manager of the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB), and the Executive Director of the North San Diego County Transit Development Board (NSDCTDB) are non-voting, ex-officio members. These agency representatives, or their designated alternate. are encouraged to attend all meetings. Compensation Regular members and alternate members acting on behalf of their regular member are compensated $100 per meeting attended. All members receive compensation for mileage and parking validation. Attachment );l-Y 2 M-34209.EPA (TAN) ------- -----. ------------ TransNet Subcommittee Regular/Alternate Membership The following individuals are regular members, representing the geographical areas noted: 1udy McCarty, Vice Chair. .. Councilmember (236-6677) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of San Diego Pam Slater """""" Supervisor (531-5533) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. County of San Die~o Dick Lyon. . . . . . . . . . . .. Mayor, Oceanside (966-4400) .. . . . . . . . . North County Coastal Don Higginson.......... Mayor, Poway (748-6600) """""" North County Inland lack Dale ............. Mayor, Santee (258-4100) .................. East County Rosalie Zarate ......"" Councilmember, National City (336-4234) ."...... South Bay The following individuals are alternate members, representing the geographical areas noted: 1st Alt.: BmHorn....... Supervisor (531-5555) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. County of San Diego 2nd All.: Greg Cox ...... Supervisor (531-5511) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. County of San Diego 1st Alt.: Barbara Warden .. Councilmember (237-6655) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of San Diego 2nd All.: Valerie Stallings '. Councilmember (237-6616) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of San Diego Bud Lewis............. Mayor, Carlsbad (434-2830) . . . . . . . . . . . North County Coastal Corky Smith ..'.""". Mayor, San Marcos (744-7543, ext. 3101) .. North County Inland An Madrid. . . . .. . " ... Mayor, La Mesa (463-6611) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . East County Shirley Horton. . . . . . . . .. Mayor, Chula Vista (691-5044) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Bay The following individuals are ex-officio members, representing the agencies noted: Gary Gallegos .......". District Director (688-6668) ................... Caltrans Tom Larwin ........... General Manager (231-1466) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MTDB Dick Fifer. . . . . . . . . . . .. Executive Director (967-2828) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. NSDCTDB /c2 ~;; Key Staff Contact: Eric Pahlke 595-5323 May 1, 1995 ..'"......'..., --~~--_.. ---_._------------~---- .---------- Agenda Item #2 ~ San Diego ASSOCL\TIOX OF GO\ LR..'~IEXTS Suile BOO, FlfSI Inle,stale Plaza June 8, 1995 .01 B Slreet San Diego. California 92101 (619)595.5300 Fa. (619)595-5305 TO: TransNet Subcommittee FROM: SANDAG Staff SUBJECT: Status of TransNet Highway Project Schedules Introduction The scheduling of individual TransNet highway projects has historically been based upon a program-wide approach. Beginning with the initial TransNet Plan of Finance in 1989, relative project priorities have reflected a regional balance, early construction of usable segments, greatest traffic service, cost-effectiveness, and consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan. The 1994 Plan of Finance retained the relative priorities carried forward through all previous versions of the Plan of Finance (see attached Table 2 "Recommended 1994 TransNet Plan of Finance - Highway Project Schedule"). This plan also assumed a level of state and federal funding sufficient to complete all highway projects by the end of the 20-year sales tax program in 2008. At the February 10, 1995 meeting, SANDAG staff reviewed the statewide transportation funding shortfall. Because of this shortfall, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) will probably not be accepting new projects for the upcoming 1996-2003 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Instead, the additional state/federal revenues in the last two years of the 1996-2003 STIP will be required to fmance projects in the previously approved 1994-2001 STIP. Given this development, SANDAG staff has analyzed the impact of the current statewide funding shortfall upon the adopted schedules for TransNet highway projects. This analysis has considered two basic scenarios: (1) DO new taxes will be enacted prior to the end of the sales tax in 2008, and (2) new taxes will be levied as soon as legislatively possible. No New Taxes The fIrSt basic scenario assumes that DO actions will be taken at the local, state, or federal level to increase the revenue stream for the duration of the TransNet Program. The only available /:2 -J ¡J MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad. Chu!a Visla. Coronado. Del Mar. EI Cajon, Encinitas. Escondido. Imperial Beach. La Mesa. Lamon Grove, National Clly. Oceanside, Poway. San Diago, San Marcos, Sanlee. Solana Beach, VISta, and Counly of San DIOgo. ADVISORYILIAISON MEMBERS: Calitornla Depanment of Transpona"on, U.S. Depanment of Defense, S.D- Unified Pon DlSlrict. and TiuanaIBaja California. _u------- - ---- "'___n - -,..--- ----u.--.--- ---------------- _u~--- funding under this assumption are the locally approved sales tax revenues and the state and federal gas tax revenues from the current 18 cent and 18.3 cent per gallon levies, respectively. The fIrSt alternative under the No New Taxes option is the "worse-case scenario." This assumes that the statewide funding problems continue and that no additional monies from the existing gas tax levies are available for TransNet highway projects prior to the end of the sales tax in 2008. This alternative assumes that no new projects can be added during the 1996-2003 STIP and all subsequent STIPs through the end of the TransNet Program. The second alternative under the No New Taxes option is the "balanced allocation of additional revenues." The "additional revenues" assumed under this scenario are from the currently authorized state and federal gas tax levies and the reauthorization of the federal Intermodal Suñace Transportation Efficiency Act (lSTEA) at current levels. The additional state/federal revenues through Fiscal Year 2008 for the San Diego region are estimated at $448 million. This estimate includes $331 million in Flexible Congestion Relief (FCR) monies from future STIPs and $117 million in federal Suñace Transportation Program (STP) monies available through the reauthorization of ISTEA. ISTEA Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds are not included in this estimate since TransNet highway projects are not eligible for CMAQ funding. CMAQ funds can be used for TransNet transit projects. Given the other needs in the region for major highway and transit improvements, SANDAG staff cannot propose that all of the additional statelfederal revenues from the existing gas tax levies be allocated to completing TransNet highway projects. The proposed "balanced allocation of additional revenues" allocates $219 million of the $448 million of additional state/federal monies to TransNet highway projects. The remaining monies would be available for other competing highway and transit projects in the region. Worse-Case Scenario The only state and federal monies considered under this alternative are the $130.7 million already programmed in the 1994-2001 STIP. This includes $22.9 million in state/federal FCR funds programmed for Route 125 Sweetwater and $40.4 million from the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program. Also included is $14.4 million of Route 76 federal demonstration monies and $53 million of federal STP funds. State/federal assistance over the length of the TransNet Program would be $188.6 million or slightly more than 10% of the total revenue available for highway projects (refer to Chart 1). Under this "Worse-Case" scenario. several TransNet highway projects may not be constructed prior to the end of the sales tax in 2008. The projected status of the TransNet highway program would be as follows (refer also to the attached Map 1 - TransNet Highway Program - Worse- Case Scenario). Route 52, Santo Road to Route 67. The segment between Santo Road and Mission Gorge Road at Big Rock Road was opened to traffic in December. 1993. The only additional section that can be constructed without additional state/federal funding is the extension to the Route 125 /~ ~// 2 -- /':.:-. ---- ----- -----------.-- - --- --------.------.-.-- --. --------------------..------------------------.------._.~- Fanita interchange. This segment is the last one required as pan of the Inner Loop freeway system and should be under construction by Fall 1995. This project also relocates Mission Gorge Road between Big Rock Road and Fanita Drive. The two remaining sections between Routes 125 and 67 would have to compete for funding after the expiration of the sales tax program. Route 54 and Route 125 San Miguel Connector. The 6-lanc freeway from 1-805 to relocated Reo Drive was opened to traffic in October, 1993. The next section of freeway with interchanges at Woodman Sttcct and Briarwood Road is under construction and will be completed by mid-1996. These segments arc key clements in the Inner Loop. The addition of two inside lanes on Route 54 between 1-805 and the Briarwood interchange would not be funded without new revenues. Sales tax monies would only be sufficient to reimburse the Route 125 South tollroad consortium for 50% of the cost of the interim San Miguel Connector. Route 56; Carmel Valley and Rancho Penasquitos. The eastern segment in the Rancho Penasquitos community of San Diego was open to traffic in July, 1993. The section in the Carmel Valley area opened in March, 1995. Under the "Worse-Case" alternative, there would only be monies for the extension of the Carmel Valley and Rancho Penasquitos segments to the Future Urbanizing Area (FUA). The widening of the freeway in Carmel Valley to a 6-lane cross section would not be completed. Route 76 West and East. The environmental document for Route 76 West covered the three westernmost sections from Airport Road to Melrose Drive. These three sections can be completed under the "Worse-Case" alternative with construction beginning in late 1995. Route 76 East, the three remaining sections to I-IS, would need to compete for funding after 2008. Route 125 Sweetwater. The entire length of this route could be constructed, albeit only to a 6-lane cross section and at a much delayed implementation schedule. This part of the Inner Loop freeway system, connecting to Route 54 in the south and Route 94 in the north, would be open to traffic by 2007 based upon current sales tax projections. The addition of two inside lanes for both this route and Route 54 to 1-805 would be delayed until after the sales tax program. Route 125 Fanita. This 6-1ane freeway could also be constructed in its entirety. However, like Route 125 Sweetwater, the opening would be delayed. This portion of the Inner Loop between 1-8 and Route 52 would not be fully opened to traffic until 2007. Balanced Allocation of Additional Revenues This alternative includes the $130.7 million of state and federal monies already programmed in the 1994-2001 STIP plus an additional $219 million of state/federal gas tax monies. The additional funding consists of $140 million in FCR monies from future STIPs and $79 million in anticipated federal STP monies available through the reauthorization of ISTEA (see Chart 2). Even under this scenario, some TransNet highway projects may not be constructed prior to the end of the sales tax program. The projected status of the TransNet highway program would be 3 /;2-/7 " ---"---- _u_--- ------~---------------- ----______n - - ----- ---_u_----- as follows (refer also to the attached Map 2 - TransNet Highway Program - Balanced Allocation of Additional Revenues). Route S1, Santo Road to Route 67. The next two segments east of the current freeway terminus at Mission Gorge Road and Big Rock Road could be completed with additional state! federal monies. The extension to the Route 125 Fanita interchange should be under construction by Fall 1995. The section between the Route 125 interchange and Cuyamaca Street could be completed by 2008. The remaining section between Cuyamaca Street and Route 67 would have to compete for funding after the expiration of the sales tax program. If this project was then the region's first priority for STIP funding, it could be completed within four years. Route 54 and Route US San Miguel Connector. The 6-1ane freeway from I-80S to east of the Briarwood Road interchange will be completed by mid-I996. The addition of two inside lanes could be completed by 2008 with these new state/federal revenues. Sales tax monies would be sufficient to reimburse the Route 125 South tollroad consortium for the interim San Miguel Connector. Route 56, Carmel Valley and Rancho Penasquitos. With the "Balanced Allocation of Additional Revenues" the extension of the Cannel Valley segment east of Cannel Country Road to the FUA as well as the Rancho Penasquitos segment from the FUA to Black Mountain Road could be completed by 2008. The funding may not, however, be sufficient to widen the Cannel Valley section to six lanes. Route 76 West and East. The three westernmost sections from Airpon Road to Melrose Drive should be under construction beginning in late 1995. The westerly section of Route 76 East between Melrose Drive and East Vista Way could also be completed under this increased funding scenario. This section of 4-lane highway could be opened to traffic as early as 2005. The remaining two sections between East Vista Way and 1-15 could be completed within three years if they were the region's top priority for STIP funding after the sales tax program expires in 2008. Route 125 Sweetwater. The entire length of this route could be constructed by 2007 if additional state/federal monies are made available. Anticipated funding would also allow for the widening of both the Route S4and Route 125 Sweetwater segments to an 8-1ane configuration by 2008. Route 125 Fanita. This 6-lane freeway could also be constructed in its entirety. This portion of the Inner Loop between 1-8 and Route 52 could be opened to traffic by 2004, three years sooner than otherwise possible without the extra state/federal monies anticipated under this scenano. New Taxes The second basic scenario assumes that actions will be taken at the local, state, and/or federal level to increase revenues for transportation purposes. The earliest such an increase could take effect would most likely be 1997. )2---).3 4 ~, -----------...-------------- -_._-----_._-_.~------ 9 f~ l~ f~ :~ i~ ~; JII ~II h -~ :II r r j' E. ~. :I:I:IjI ~I: ~;;; f~f~ ~~~~~~i. ;;0 ;¡¡oIío~ II .~~ ""..~ ""..n.~ m ~ - -N- ¡¡ ..0 . 0 liff II frmm !¡,¡ fàli=¡ i: ~ [!~[ It JI" i'I!; 'r[ii ~ :II ,~I, fir .[[ I if ift'r' C Ii ~ i i fIr! i i [[ ~ ! 1.1 I I. g [!f '"' i~JJ ¡i[ ~I~f f i .. ~ i I I . r r .. I .. r [ . -i . f;. ~ 1- ¡-~--- ~ I I - ~~: -====~: i~ 1- fTii=Ä=HP; i~ ..-.-.-..... .-.....-..- ----... "'.'.-..-................ ............................................... 0 ~ ~ ~ ê ~ ê ~ æ m "-.'" ..-- .--- .-,--....""..,. --..............-.....-....--.. I I _.. l ---..--.1.-..... ......-.-.........1....-....--.......-.: ~ .. .... ----... "--..--.-.-.-. . :::e !! ê . > ¡¡ -..- OJ ~ I : :s ~ Ii - ; f-------- .." ~ z I : $ 0 ~ .-.- . - c.. I II - .¡. ~L- ~ ft ft i I I 0 --. --.-.....----.. J: -LL _u__. ._lJ___- g I~~ i I~ c: .-r~-"~'- .- .! -... .....~-_.~.._---_.. fñ -R ,.. ,.. - .-;------.. "".R-.."'---'..'.--'..'.'" " R ,.. ,.. - R ~ g '-ä--" -- '-¡:¡-sf-- -..;----.......' _...~.....E......................._...... ¡' ,.. ~ ~. ¡:: /:2 -/'/ ---------,.----------",,---..,..------------------------- - --------- SANDAG developed this scenario by reviewing the highway project schedules in the 1994 TransNet Plan of Finance against the annual funding shortfalls under the previous "Balanced Allocation of Additional Revenues" alternative. To overcome these revenue shortfalls, a gas tax increase of 4 cents per gallon should take effect in Fiscal Year 1997-98, with an additional 1 cent per gallon increase each year for the next four years. Consistent with current state law, it was assumed that 70% of the additional gas tax monies generated would be made available for programming at the regional level with 30% used on a statewide discretionary basis. It was further assumed that 100% of the additional revenue at the regional level would be programmed for TransNet highway projects for the fl1'St three years, dropping to 50% for the remainder of the TransNet Program (see Chart 3). This approach is consistent with the revenue assumptions made in the 1994 TransNet Plan of Finance, which included an increase in the gas tax of 1 cent per gallon per year beginning in Fiscal Year 1994-95. It is also similar to the last statewide gas tax increase which started with a 5 cent per gallon increase in 1990 followed by a 1 cent per gallon per year increase for the next four years. The assumed 4 cent increase in Fiscal Year 1997-98 could be viewed as a "catch-up" for not having an increase in the gas tax since January 1994. The history of gas tax increases at both the state and federal levels is shown on the attached Appendix C(3) from the 1994 Regional Transportation Plan. Over the last decade, the annual average gas tax increase has been 1.8 cents per gallon. The annual average increase over the last 20 years has been 1.3 cents per gallon. Given these trends, an average annual increase of 1 cent per gallon is not an unreasonable assumption. ProDosed Action bv TransNet Subcommittee Without new taxes, the "balanced allocation of additional revenues" should probably be the basis for updating the TransNet Plan of Finance. The Plan would not need modification if the new 8 cents per gallon gas tax (4 cents plus 1 cent per year for four years), or some equivalent revenue source, goes into effect by 1997. Before deciding upon a course of action, the Subcommincc should review the status of the reimbursement proposal for the Route 125 San Miguel Connector (refer to Agenda Item #2) reflected in the 1994 Plan of Finance. The latest alternatives for early payment to CTV for the Connector should also be considered. This item will be on the agenda for the June 30, 1995 meeting of the Subcommincc for further discussion and/or action. Anaclunents 5 /;¿ - ~ç-- . (\ '! - --~------ ---------- ---------------- - ---------~-- -------------- - ------------------------- ! .................................... '..'...".."..'.'......'.."'."".'..'.".' .......-................. .. 0 ."'.".'."'.."......"...."..... .....'..'...."".'....'.""..-".""'.. ....-..--......... w I ...J .................................... -...................................-.... .............-........ => II C .................................... .......................-.................. ----_.. w a ~ ~ :t: '--"....."".'... ....-...............-."'-..-...-. 0 s ~ V) .....-.-......-........ ................_.........~..._..... -- I t- ~ :! ~ :! ~ \J ~ frl ,õ .........-...--....-.. ............_..~......~...._..... """"1-' a ' ....-.-..........--.. ..............................-. ".j-.-' Iii Q: g ~ ~ ~ I D. I '."""'--'..'.".".".""'.' ...........~......~._._...._...... .~-I- ~ >- .-""--."."."".. .......................-.-. ..-...- < I ~~II ~Ig I ~ ~ """..'."".'.".""""r" '~.."'I"..'rl....'._.' I-I."'.'r I (!) ..."".'."."".'..........'-..... .....................................-..... ........-........ :E I:! ~ iiii i ¡¡ = \J i i i i i ¡j I ...............-................ ....'..................................,..... .....--..-.. w I~~ ~ 1111 1 I . 0 .................................... ............................................. ....._...... 3 ~~ :~-f:~~ f ãI u. Sj ~ I . ~~:==:[ I i "--- --- I ~ ) . t- . J i I I ~~ i I I i 1 I j I c J ,I , I , ~ .".,'..,.'.'.'.'.".'""..",.'",,'.11 1]1:11 ,!. I Z {if If 1)1 1)3 r:: ¡ ~:~~~] Jill I III ~ 0, fa .,'" 1"~'? ~;~~; æ¡; ~ /!/!/!/! ~~~~~ ~p~ - .f .1 i /!.. ~I ~t iiI Ii.. Ii... /:;l-/ç{ 7 -----~----- ------------.. ----------~----_..._-..- _m______--------- --------------------~------m_..____--- CHART 1 800~ jf LOOt: ---- _._--- / 9OOt: -- - - . . - . - SOOt: --- --... -- ---..f ¡,oot: .. .. -..f tOOt: . . - . -I. .. f Q) t:001: ~ j 6í a: ~00t: 1!! E ¡ i f! .2 0001: 'i en êã. . . . ¡¡; e c éi5 a. Q) 666~ II! III i:/A .1 ~ ê ~ Q) 866~ ~ ~øt £ ~ c3 L66~ ~ .. '. - -I - t "' CI) Q) J! Z ~ 966~ ðJ ~ 0 .t c f! ~ S66~ I- lit ¡'66~ I &66~ - . - - . . - . . t:66~ '-'" ----.- --/-- .'ì¡!!"~':,'! ,,'!'!'" !,!,!.", 'r" ~66~ . j II 1/-"',,\/ ,.",.,..,'" 066~ . . -- ¡ - . -I 686~ 8 ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ a - M M M M ø M ø M ~ M (SUO!IIIt") S8nU8^81:1lenuuy /;2 - )J? 8 . I ---------'______n . -.--- -----______n- -_.__._------- ---'-"-'--______n______------.--------- -------.- m - 8cIIod.loa '_Pion W..... -,- of ....... eo.. -12 -Mio8ionGorgotoRta_125 1895.96 1996-97 - Ate. 125 to Cuyomaca 2004-06 2008 . . Cuyomaca to Ate, FiT 2008-07 2008 . ... DIogo !Ioglon -.. MAP AREA - Son MJguol Connoctor 1999-08 1999-08 - &-Laning 2004-04 2008 . RoUloH - ExIon8ions to FUA 2008-06 2008-08 - 8-Lanlng Cormol VoJloy 2008-06 2008 . RouIo 78 -Airport to Malro.. 1895.97 1896-98 - Mal- 10 E.VIota Way 2003-06 2008 . -E_Vi.1a 10 Mi..k>n 2003-06 2008 . . Miuíon 10 1.15 2008-08 2008 . R- 125 -..., - Flood Conlrol Channel 1997.98 1997-98 - Jamacha Bv. 10 Jamaeha Rd- 1998.99 1998-00 -Jamacha Rd. to Rio. 94 1999-01 2001-03 - Ria. 54 and 94 Connactíona 2001-03 2005-07 -8-Laning 2004-04 2008 . 1998-99 2002-04 2000-01 2005-07 1896-97 1998.97 Map 1 TRANSNET HIGHWAY PROGRAM WORSE CASE SCENARIO - TransNet Highweys Completed by FY 2008 -- TransNet Highweys Åo Pending in FY 2008 3 a N "'LES ~San Diego U.S.A. ASSOCIATION OF MEXICO GOVERNMENTS );¿ -J Y "".....,"'~,-"... 9 ----~--- ----..-- .. _._------~..__.... .__._---~--------- 01 ~ f;""" Annual Revenues (Millions) C7 ... ... ... - ~ ~ 8 2ì § 8 ~ 8 c:9 ,I .Y f{ 1989 ,:1 ~ ,/~ e -.. - -. "'" - - - - -.. - - -. - - .... - - - - - - .... - . - UJ( ~ ~ m 1990 e!. .... C I» --I :I 1991 ,,'/1liliiii (") - - - .. - -. - - .. - - - - -" - - - - - - - - CD 0- 1992 > '1-' 0 1993 ':'1: ;0. (") ~ 0 1994 ' , :,IL :I t .. - - -1- - - - - S,...¡ 1995 :cii1 c - - - - - (1) :J I» In g¡ 1996 C/lZ iÐ -. - - - - - - - - O! .. :I:z: ~ 1997 I» -. S!:co f '<~ 1998 ~I ::J i §¡ - - - - - - .. - 1»"< iii iiJ 1999 ;', ='V ¡{2 I I» a a S!:co ~ 2000 'Ii-:,' (1) ii1 +.. - - - - .. - . -. - - - - - - -. - - - - . -- ~3 t1) æ. it 2001 JJ t - - - ~ ~ -. "T1 2002 (1) :i t.. - - - -I - - - -. 0- - - - - - (1) 2003 ØJ .. .. - - - - - .. ... -. - - .. - - - - - - - .. - - - -- - - - :c 2004 . "I ,. CD - f - I I -I < - - CD 2005 .,<,;J::;;?:"..,.;:':'::' : :I c: - - - - - - f -. -. - - -. - - - - - - - -- . - - - - - . - - - - - - -- - (1) 2006 """"""""""""""',"':.,.;.'!!.;.;. I - - I 1 2007 , - - - .. - -- -. - - - 2008 ' , " Z UIVH::> I;) - /9 ------- ------------ - -------. - -- -------------- ------ --_._-----------------~--- m Con8truction _.'0. '1M Pion 8oloncod -,- of Finan.. AlIocoUon 1995-96 1996-97 2004.06 2006.08 2006-07 2008 + 1M DIogo Roglon IIAP AREA '899-08 , 999-08 2004-04 2008-08 _58 . extensions to FUA 2008-08 2008-08 . Sol.8nlng 01",,01 Volley 2008-08 2008 + Routon . Airport 10 Moho.o '995-97 '996-98 . Melrose 10 E. Vist8 Woy 2003-06 2004-05 . E.Vill8 to Mission 2003-08 2008 + . Million to 1.15 2008.08 2008 + Route '25 8_..., . FlOOd Control Chonnol '997-98 '997-98 . Jameche Bv- to Jlmeche Rd- '998.99 1898-00 . Jamachl Rd. to RIo. 84 '898.01 2001-03 . Rli. 54 and 84 Connections 2001-03 2005-07 . SoLoninS 2004-04 2008-08 '998-99 '999.01 2000-01 2003-04 1996-97 '996-97 Map 2 TRANS NET HIGHWAY PROGRAM BALANCED ALLOCATION OF ADDITIONAL REVENUES - TrlnlNot Hlghw8YS Completed by FY 2008 - TransNot Highways ÂD Pending In FY 2008 . . N MILES ~ San Diego U.S.A. ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS MEXICO ._"'-_...~.- .".. /2 -d- tJ 11 ~---~- - -------.. -------- - ------------ II Annual Revenues (Millions) ø ø ø ø ø Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ â ~ ~ ~ 00 1~ 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - 1990 en 1--- -- -- ~ 1~ ~ ---- - - -- ø 1992 Ø) ---- -- - g 1993 G> Ø) en c 1994 ~ (J II) -I !!!. X D1 ~ 1995 I ::J ~ ~ø ; 1996 (') ~ ~ CD:z: CD ::J -. è 1997 Cñ cg. CD --~ m ::J ~ ~ 1m ~~ - -<- -< ~ : co ~ §. iiI 1999 00 0 ~ Ø)~ - ::J III ii' 2000 a. 3 ~ -- ~ ::J ~ 2001 --- --- Q z ~ ~ 2002 - (j) - - - -< ! ~ m e¡ .. - - - ~ 2004 "" Q -..-- -_..---- z ~ ~ - - ~ 2006 "- - - -< -.. . CD f\ Ø) 2007 " ø ~œ ~ \; , E ~~VH~ /c1 ---,;l J \ '.; ,--=-, ----------- ---------------- ----- ------ -- ---- ------ ---- - - ----------- APPENDIX C (3) STATE AND FEDERAL GASOUNE TAX RATE HISTORY (Cents per Gallol\) Federal Slate Total Gu Tax Effective Date ~ ~ Gu Tax (2) J22il.ill Before 1923 0 0 0 -- October I, 1923 0 2C 2C - February 29, 1927 0 3c 3c - June 21, 1932 IC 3C 4C - June 17, 1933 J.5C 3C 4.5C - JanlW)' 1. 1934 IC 3C 4C - July I, 1940 1.5C 3c 4.5c 61c July I, 1947 1.5C 4.5c 6C 41C November I, 1951 2C 4.5C 6.5C 41C July I, 1953 2C 6C 8C sac July I, 1956 3C 6C 9C sac October 1. 1959 4C 6C loe 6OC October 1. 1963 4C 7C (I) JlC 61C JanlW)' I, 1983 4C 9C 13C 17C April 1, 1983 9C 9C 18C 23C Au¡ust I, 1990 9C 14C (4) 23C 23C December I, 1990 14C (5) 14C 28C 28C JanlW)' I, 1991 14C 15c 29C 29C JanlW)' I, 1992 14C 16C 3OC 3OC JanlW)' I, 1993 14C 17C 31C 31C October I, 1993 18.3C 17c 35.3C 35C JanlW)' I, 1994 18.3C (7) 18c 36.3C 36c Note.: (1) Temporary Ie ÎDCreuel ÎD the IWe au tax were imposed for ..veralmoaths ÎD 1965 aDd 1969 for floocl-<lama¡e road repair. (2) III JanlW)' 1994, di_1 fuel wu taxed II 42.4e per ao11on. ne IIaIe eli-I fuel tax (currently 18c per ao11on) wu fin! impooed ÎD 1937. ne federal die..1 tax which wu ÎDcnued to 24.4e per ao11on on October I, 1993, wu lint impooed OD November I, 1951. (3) Total au tax meuured ÎD _t 1993 doDan. Califomia Coutruction Colt IIIdex uoed ÎD detenninina relative buyÎDa power of pi tax. IIIdex not available prior to 1940. Bue 1987111dex - 100.0. 1992 IIIdex - 106.8. (4) ne IIaIe au tax and IIaIe die..1 fuel tax will be ÎDcnued by 1 cent per pJ\on DII JanlW)' 1 of 1991, 1992, 1993, ad 1994. (5) ne 5e per pJ\on federal au tax ÎDcreue effective December I, 1990 ÎDclude. 2.5e for Hilhway Trust Fund and 2.5e for focIeral General FWld 'deficit ncluction.' ne 'IDtermoclal Surface Tnwportation EfficieDcy Act of 1991' extended the 11.5e federal pi tax lOins to the Hislnvay Trust Fund throu¡h September 30, 1999. ne 2.5e coÎDa to the federal General Fund wu ICheduJed to expire on October I, 1995. ne 'Omnibuo Budael RCCOIIcilialion Act of 1993' extended the expiration dale of the 2.5e from October I, 1995 to December 31, 1999 with the revenue. depotited ÎD the Hish-y Trust FWld. (6) nere is an additional O.le per p110D federal Gu Tax to finance the Lealåna UnclerJTOWld StoTaae Trust FWld 'LUST FWld.' (T) ne 'Budaet RCCOIIcilillion Act of 1993' ÎDcnued the federal motor fuel tax by 4.3e per ao11oD effective October I, 1993 for deficit reduction. 13 /.2 --- d-;L , ./)U ._~-----_.__._--- ...-----.-------..,,----- tl )ÞID a.!!!. 0.11 æ~ g:!. !!.)Þ 21= =! z ~ 0 ; Ii ~ 18 0 C) - II 1/1 ~ ';} M 3: ~ -I II ~ .. m =:D ::::J O~ ." fn ~~ Z ;;3: CD II~ ... ~= ëÞ6' ::t "',Æ. -. g':D CC a;.g :r ¡;¡ _. == s.~ ~~ m ~ ¡Q '< ::r. ~ "'tJ g" II Iii" .. f{!~ 0 -- CC "':!! " .. z'" m ." ~ :IE.. 3 G'> e¡ -t ~ II r !:!1 8 !!!. en !!!. : ';} M V ~ tlVH:::> /.2 ~;¿5 '/ . / i ! ------ -- ----.--.- ___n--_____------ .----.-.-- /' Agenda Item #3 ~ San Diego ASSOCIATIOX OF / 8, ,~' GO, LR.\:~IEXTS Suilo BOO. F"s' Inlo'slalo Plaza 401 B Street San Diego. California 92101 /' (619)595-5300 Fax (619)595-5305 TO: TransNet Subcommittee FROM: SANDAG Staff SUBJECT: Agreement with California Transponation Ventures for Route 125 San Miguel Connector Introduction In 1991, Caltrans granted California Transponation Ventures (CTV) a franchise to develop the 125 South Expressway as one of the four, privately-funded AD 680 projects statewide. The project extends between Route 9O5/0tay Mesa Road and the Route 125 San Miguel Counector, one of the projects included in the TransNet Program (refer to the attached figure entitled Alternative Alignment Segments). The franchise agreement also allows crv to expand its coverage to include Route 125 Sweetwater (Route 54 to Route 94) and Route 125 Fanita (Fletcher Parkway to Route 52) with the approval of SANDAG. The original design concept for the Route 125 San Miguel Counector (Connector) was a full freeway-to-freeway interchange with Route 54 in the vicinity of Sweetwater RoadlWorthington Street and an 8-lane roadway connecting to an anerial street at San Miguel Road. The ultimate design for the CTV project is an 8-lane tollway with provisions for HOV/transit in the median. 4altrans is preparing the environmental document for the entire length of Route 125 between oute 905 and Route 54, including the Connector. crv is assisting Caltrans with this effort and is providing the design engineering services. CTV plans to begin construction in 1ate-1996 of an initial 4-1ane highway. 1994 TransNet Plan of Finance Fundinl! Pronosal for the Connector The concept for the Connector was revised when the 1994 TransNet Plan of Finance was adopted. A lower cost 4-lane interim connection between Route 54 and the crv project to the IOUth was developed, compatible withcrv's plans for an initial 4-lane highway. The 1994 Plan assumed that crv would build the Connector at the same time it built the tollroad (1996) and that SANDAG would reimburse CTV over a 100year period beginning in 1999. MEMBER AGENCIES: Ci;ies 01 Carlsbed,.Chula Vista. Coronado, Dol Mar, EI Calon, Encinitas, Escondido Imperial Beeeh. La Masa. Lemon Grove. . Nalionel City. Oceanside. Poway. Son Diego, Son Marcos, Santee, Solene Beach. Visla, and Counly 01 San Diego. ADVISORYILIAISON MEMBERS: California Depanment of Transponatlon. U_S. Depanmant of Dj;¿,:;:ty Pon Dislnct- and TijuanaiBaja California. -~ -----~-- ---_.--...__._-_.._---_.._-----------------~---------------- ' I OTAY MESA P: ~ , - - - - - FUTURE ROADS us' .~IE~~R:_~~V~.p~:_....._.=..J..._..--_.__......_.. .......... FUTURE HIGHWAYS .-.....--......-.- ._..'.._"~~;,~ö"°._- 6? ~5ELARDOLoRODRIGUEZ 0"- 'ii'fk!}(jf)LiJœ!ij~ AIRPORT "...-- /d- ~ .2-> Alternative Alignment Segments 2 In ------~ --~--_o_-_o__o -- _0__--___---------- --------- - ----- ------------ - ------- _0 ----- SANDAG staff and CTV have been attempting to formulate a written agreement to implement the 10-year reimbursement provided for in the Plan of Finance. These discussions have identified four issues that must be resolved prior to a formal agreement. 1. Under the current proposal, CTV would provide the initial funding for the Connector. In order to secure fmancing, CTV needs a fJrm guarantee ftom SANDAG that monies will be available for the 100year reimbursement. To satisfy its investors, CTV asked for a letter of credit and a stipulation that their reimbursement would not be subordinated to future bond issues. On the other hand, SANDAG's fmancial advisors are concerned that such a guarantee could limit future funding options for the implementation of other TransNet projects. 2. The Connector design in effect at the time of Proposition A was a freeway connection between Route 54 and a local anerial at San Miguel Road. This facility was to be funded with sales tax revenues and has, therefore, always assumed to be "toll free." The current design does not include an interchange at San Miguel Road because of concerns over increased neighborhood traffic and local opposition to the highway going through the Bonita-Sunnyside area. Both the County of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista prefer that the fIrSt interchange be at San Miguel Ranch Road, a proposed street approximately one-quarter mile to the south of existing San Miguel Road. The construction of this street, however, depends upon the development of the area currently owned by Emerald Properties. Unless plans proceed quickly for this new street, the fIrSt interchange with the initial highway may be at East H Street, almost three miles south of San Miguel Road. Without an interchange at San Miguel Road, motorists would have to pay a toll when using the first section of highway south of Route 54. Even though residents have been paying sales tax since 1988, they would not be able to drive on a "toll free segment." 3. CTV's traffic/economic forecasts highlight the need to have Route 125 open to traffic to at least Route 94 when the tollroad opens or shonIy thereafter. The to1lroad could be open as early as 1998. The 1994 Plan of Finance does not complete the Route 125 Sweetwater connection to Route 94 West until 2001. The connections to Route 125 North and Route 94 East are not planned until 2003. Given the amount of right-of-way required for Route 125 Sweetwater, it probably cannot be completed before 2000 even with unlimited funding. Accelerating the completion of this route is apparently crucial to the to1lroad's success, but would delay all of the other TransNet routes currently scheduled between now and 2000. 4. The Connector is just one of many projects in the TransNet Program. The current statewide transportation funding shortfall (see Agenda Item #1) impacts the entire program. Financing the Connector with 100% sales tax revenues complicates the funding situation for the other routes. 3 / ;l-d.'?' --------- ------------------------------- -- - -------------------- Alternative Fundinl! ProDosal CTV has suggested that an earlier, lower payment for the San Miguel Connector would be an acceptable alternative to the la-year reimbursement reflected in the 1994 Plan of Finance. Under this alternative, SANDAG would pay CTV for 80% of the cost of the Connector (interim 4-lane design) in two installments prior to consttuction rather than over 10 years after the facility was consttucted. SANDAG would also pre-pay CTV for completing the porÍìon of Route 54 involved in the Route 125 interchange in the vicinity of existing Sweetwater Road. Under any alternative, the completion of Route 125 Sweetwater no later than 2001 is very imponant to CTV. The Early Payment to CTV alternative requires a $2 million disbursement in 1995 for the design of the Connector. An additional $69 million would be payable in 1997 for the consttuction of the Connector and the affected segment of Route 54. Paying 80% of the cost of the Connector could save the TransNet Program approximately $12 million. The earlier payment dates will, however, have an adverse impact upon the schedules for several of the other TransNet highway projects. Paying earlier also means that the disbursements must be made with sales tax funds rather than a mix of sales tax and state and/or federal monies. Under the "worse-case" scenario (refer to Agenda Item #1), the accelerated payments to CTV would only be possible by dramatically impacting Route 125 Fanita. The segment between Fletcher Parkway and Navajo Road would be delayed three years, while the Grossmont College to Route 52 section would be delayed nine years (Map A). Finally, under this alternative, the segment between Navajo and Grossmont College would not be built before the end of the sales tax program. The early payment to CTV would have less of an impact, although still significant, upon Route 125 Fanita under the "balanced allocation of additional revenues" scenario. The section between Fletcher and Navajo would be delayed three years, the section between Navajo and Grossmont would be delayed one year, and the section north of Grossmont to Route S2 would be delayed 8 years (Map B). Under the "balanced allocation" scenario, the Early Payment to CTV alternative would also impact Routes 52 and 76. The funds remaining after the early payment would no longer be adequate to fund the section of Route S2 between Route 125 and Cuyamaca. The remaining monies would only be sufficient to complete the section of Route 76 between East Vista Way and Mission RoadlFallbrook Junction. There would be no funds for widening Routes 54 and 125 Sweetwater to 8 lanes. The extension of Route S6 to the City of San Diego's Future Urbanizing Area would also be delayed until after the end of the sales tax program. 4 /;.2-.2) ! /7 --~-------------~------------- -------------~- - ----------------------------- --------------- m C_lon Schodu'" W- loony II..... IlIogmonto Cua '-' 1996.97 1996.97 2008 + 2008 + 2008 + 2008 + \--- MAP AREA 1899-OS 1995-97 2008 + 2008 + _II . ExtonoJons to FUA 2008 + 2008 + Ocoonaldo ~... . tI-.....ng Co,,",,1 Valley 2008 + 2008 + IIoUio 71 . Alrpon to Malro.. 1996-99 1996-99 . MolraealO E.ViIto Way 2008 + 2008 + . E.ViIto to Mission 2008 + 2008 + . Miloionto 1.15 2008 + 2008 + IIoUio 125 8_010, - Flood Control Channal 1997-98 1997-98 . Jamacha By. to Jamacha Ad. 1998-00 1998.99 . Jamacl1a Ad. to Ata. 94 2001-03 1999.01 . Ato. 54 and 94 Connactlons 2005-07 2000-01 . Haning 2008 + 2008 + 11- 125 Fanlta . Flatchar to Nayajo 2002-04 2006-07 Enclnllas , - Nayajo to Grae,,"ont CoIJega 2005.07 2008 + --1 . GlOOImont CoIIaga to Ata, 52 1996-97 2005-06 DaIMa, MapA J TRANSNET HIGHWAY PROGRAM WORSE CASE SCENARIO EARLY PAYMENT TO CTV - TrsnlNet Highways Completed by FY 2008 -- TrsnsNet Highways Âo Pending in FY 2008 3 1 N MILES ~SaD Diego ~~I\ ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS ..""""'-~-_..... ~. S 0.) ----~----- ---------------- -- - - - ------------- ---------- -- m Con8tructlon "_uloa "10""" E8r1y - I SogIMIII8 81- P8ymant Rou1852 - Miuion Go<ge to Ate. 125 1996-97 1996-97 - Rle- 125 to Cuyamaca 2006-08 2008 + . Cuyamaca to Rta. 67 2008 + 2008 + Ian DIogolloGlon 118. aREA 11189-08 1995.97 2008-08 2008 + Route sa . Extanai0n8 to FUa 2006-08 2008 + .6-Unlng COrmal Valley 2008 + 2008 + Route 71 . AIrport to Melrose 1996-98 1996-98 - Melrose to E.Viota Way 2004-05 2006-07 . E.VioIato Minion 2008 + 2005-07 . Miseion to 1.15 2008 + 2008 + _125_"'r . Flood CanUel Channel 1997.98 1997.98 . Jamacha Bv. to Jamaeha Rd. 1998-00 1998-99 . Jamacha Rd. to Rte. 94 2001-03 1998-00 . RIa. 54 and 94 Connaclions 2005-07 1997-00 .6-Lanlng 2008-08 2008 + 2002-04 2005-07 2005-07 2006-08 1996-97 2004-05 MapB TRANSNET HIGHWAY PROGRAM BALANCED ALLOCATION OF ADDITIONAL REVENUES EARLY PAYMENT TO CTV - TranaNet Highways Completed by FY 2008 - TransNet Highways Åo Pending in FY 2008 3 . N MILES ~ San Diego ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS ..__M_-N- "... 6 I .----------- ______n ------ ------~---- ProDosed Action bv TransNet Subcommittee SANDAG staff and CTV need feedback from the Subcommittee on the continued viability of the 10-year reimbursement proposal in the 1994 Plan of Finance as well as the Early Payment alternative. This item will also be on the agenda for the June 30, 1995 meeting of the Subcommittee for further discussion and/or action. 7 /,;¿<J 0 ----------- - u_------ - ------------ - -------------- ---------------- ------- ------------ Agenda Item #5 June 8, 1995 ~ San Diego ASSOCIATIOX OF GO, 'ER"ÜIEXTS Suite 800, F"st Interstate Plaza 401 B Street San Dle90, California 92101 (619)595-5300 Fax (619)595-5305 TO: Trans Net Subcommittee FROM: SANDAG Staff SUBJECT: Applications for Cycle 7 of the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program Introduction The project applications for the seventh cycle of the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program (SLTPP) are due to Caltrans District 11 by June 30, 1995. This program provides up to 50% state funding for locally fmanced transportation projects meeting certain eligibility requirements. Construction contracts for the projects included in this cycle of the program must be awarded after July I, 1995, but not later than June 30, 1997. TransNet Highway projects have already received almost $29 million of supplemental funding under the first five cycles of this program. The funding rates for the first five cycles were 21.77%, 30.04%, 21.S7%, 22.43%, and 19.35%. The preliminary estimate for the sixth cycle is only 3.53 %, reflecting the governor's recommendation to only budget $100 million for this program instead of the $200 million in prior years. This rate will be finalized once all project sponsors notify Caltrans which projects to keep in the sixth cycle and the Legislature approves the budget for SLTPP. For a point of reference, the preliminary rate for the fourth cycle was 9.87% and increased to 22.43 % after the deadline for shifting projects out of that funding cycle. The experience during the fifth cycle was similar with the preliminary rate of 9.37% increasing to the fina1 rate of 19.35%. There are four (4) projects, included in the updated Plan of Finance for the TransNet Program, which should be eligible for SLTPP funding (refer to Table 1). Some of the projects currently in Cycle 6 (see Table 2) may have to shift to Cycle 7 because ongoing right-of-way lCqUisition efforts may delay contract award beyond the June 30, 1996 deadline for that cycle of the program. SANDAG and Caltrans staffs are currently reviewing these projects in detail and will repon the results of their analysis at the June 23, 1995 meeting of the Board of Directors. Pronosed Action bv TransNet Subcommittee Staff requests the Subcommittee's suppon of the Cycle 7 applications for the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program. MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Dal Mar. EI Cajon, Encinitas. Escondi¿ ~;¿ Lh,la Mesa, Lamon Grove. National City, Oceanside, Poway. San Die90, San Marcos, Santee. Solana Beach, Vista, and County Of San Diego. ADVISORYIlIAISON MEMBERS: Califomia Depanment 01 Transponation. U-S- Depanment of Defen.e, 5,0. Unified pon DIStrict. and TijuanalBaja Califomia. -----.----------- . ---------- -------______n ------ --------....------..----- Table 1 TRANSNET HIGHWAY PROGRAM 7TH CYCLE APPLICATIONS STA TE.LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE Route 5 Bikeway $3,112.000 South Bay Route 76 West Landscaping $1,560.000 Foussat to Academy Rd Route 76 West Landscaping $500,000 Academy Rd to College Route 76 West: Landscaping $600,000 College to Jeffries Ranch /.;2-3.:2 2 - ---------.---- ---_.- - --- ..- . --------_._------_._____~n_____.-- Table 2 TRANSNET HIGHWAY PROGRAM STATUS OF 6TH CYCLE APPLICATIONS STATE. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM PROJECT APPLICA nON STATUS Route 52 East 4-lane Freeway $14,100,000 Advertising August 1995 Mission Gonle to Route 125 Route 54 South Bay Landscaping $735,000 Advertising March 1996 Woodman/Briarwood Route 76 West Mitigation $5,268,000 Advertising October 1995 Pihmm Creek Route 76 West 4-lane Expressway $26,928,000 Advertising October 1995 Foussat to Academv Rd Route 76 West 4-lane Expressway $9,622,000 Advertising August 1995 Academv Rd to CoHel!e Route 76 West 4-lane Expressway $8,987,000 Advertising October 1995 CoHel!e to Jeffries Ranch Route 125 Sweetwater Flood Channel $36.114,100 Advertising April 1996 Jamacha Bv. to Tvler Route 125 Fanita 6-lane Freeway $28,300,000 Advertising September 1995 Grossmont CoHel!e to Mission Gorl!e 3 );)~;7J ------~------ --- - ------------~_..._--------~-----~--------_.__.~------------ 1!6/15/95 18:11 U1 619 338 8123 CTV PB SD IiIIOO1 CALIFORNIA 'lRANSPORTATION VENTURES, INC. 1230 COLUMBIA STREET, SUlTB 640 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 Phone: (619) 338-8385 FAX: (619) 3388123 FAX COVER SHEET June IS, 1995 To: Mr.lohnLippett From: Kent Olsen cç: Charles Stoll Robert Garin Subject: Material for Council Package - SR125 South As we diøc:ussed today, attached is some background infol'D1ll1ion on the SR125 South Project. Some oftbis may be useful as background infol'D1ll1ion for the COUDCiI. For the presentation itself: we would propose the following outline: Introduction - Kent Olsen (CTV) Slide presentation on need and benefits - Kent Olsen Status of environmental process - Charles "Musss" Stoll (CaItrans) Four minute video on electronic toll collection Questions and amswers. We would hope to obtain a resolution ftom the City that would include the following points: 1. The City supports the SRl2S South ToU Rold as proposed by Ca1trans and crY. 2. The City urges SANDAG to keep the San Migue1 Road Connector and SR125 Sweetwater Section scbeduled and tùnded as aurently approved in the plan offinalwe to leverage the private funds proposed for SR12S South. 3. The City will assist Caltrans, SANDAG and crv u DeCeIIIIy to help make SR12S South happen. If there is addiûonal information you need, please don't hesitate to call. /;2- J'Í ---~--------_.--_.- ------------------- ------------------..--------------------. ~6/15/S5 18:12 1t1 US 338 8123 CTV PB SD IZIOO2 . ." . STATE ROUI'E 125 SOUTH AN INNOVATIVE FINANCING PUBLICIPlUV ATE P ARTNERSBIP FOCUS: THE ENVIRONMENTAL ARROV AL PROCESS StIde Rœtc (SIt) 125 Souda is 8D 11.2111i1e, œa limo. 1imiIecI- Jüahway in DIIbcm SaD Diego Couoty, Cali&xDia. This ICIpICIIt ofhighway ïi c:ñtical to die ncïoa.- oaly cIoe8 it fill in a IIIiaia¡ IiD1c ÍD a cbiJd DDI'Ih1auIh corridor fbr die 1XNII1y, but it providea criIic:IIly a=ded apœssway - to die OIay t.ba Port ofPøtry to Mmåco. 1bis border CR8ÎD8111C111t1y ~ die oaly COIIIIIICI'eÍII CI'CIiIIÏIIC in metropoIitaø SaD Diego allOW baDd1a170% oldIe ÎDtI:nuItioaal tmde with Mcxiœ. SR 125 South is beiø¡ ~ . a tnIe eumpJe of publK:lprivaœ plltlll:øbips. TIllIIIÜeI of die project is to be a toU rOId fimdcd by a priwre comp8II)', CaIifbmia ~ IDe. (CI'V), UDder CaIiComia'. AB6BO progtam. CaItraaa Idmiaisfen die hdIiae fix die ton mad a is perfonaiD¡ die 1ll\lÌRllllllel1IucIiea. ODe mile It die IIOfIh cad oldIe project IIId die ÌIItcR:II8II¡e with die e:rcistiaa hi¡hway œtwodc: is 1imded by die local MáIOpo1itan PbmaiDa OJp,,¡-tioo\ SID Die¡o Association ofGoYemmeats (SANDAG) IIIÏD¡ local sales laX _. CaItraaa, SANDAG IIIId C1V haw been wariåa& topIbcr IÎIIœ 1991 to -plele a1ipmcat IIIId tccImica1 atudies IIId PRpaRI die cbaft IIIVÌRIIIIIIeII doI:umeDt. 'DIe cbaft BIR/EIS will be åRuIaœcI dWi.-mer. 'DIe IaIgCt elite for fiaa1 CIIYÏJaImeaIal apprvval wal8YÌled 1ast)Uf to December 1995. For dWi publiclprivatc partDenhip to be au=:a6d in IIØradÏII¡ $300 miIIioa in priwre capital for cœstrucIiDg dWi aICIItiaI public iD1iaCruc:Iwe, die f'edeI1I1 so-zaœut .-Is to join die p8I1Dm1hip by cxpeditiDg die Record ofDocisiOll- by die IaIgCt daœ. /;2.~ yç ----------------- ---n____- - ----------------------------------------------- - ------------ Q6/15/95 18:27 01 619 338 8123 crv PB SD i¡OO2 . , \ 7.. "2- MAti Of ~I--' -A1ION AND -- ACI!NCY Pm WIlSON, 0..- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . FACT SHEET ROUTE 126 SOUTH (FROM ROUTE 906 TO ROUTE 54) February 1995 OVERALL GOALS Complete e missing gap in the San Diego highway "etwork Reduce out-of-direction travel Increase north/soUth capacity for future travel between the United States and - Mexico via the Intemetional Port of Entry at Otey Mesa Alleviate congestion on Interstates 5 and 805 Serve existing and future planned and approved development in the South Bay and Otay Mesa THE PROJECT The project consists of constructing about 11 miles of new highway alignment from Route 905 near the Intemational Border to Route 54 near the SweetwBter Reservoir. The project calls for the ultimate construction of an eight-lane highway plus possible construction of either two transit lanes or rail facilities. BACKGROUND Route 125 has been part of the state freeway/expressway system since 1959. The Califomia Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted all of the Route 125 segment locations in the early 1960's. The route 8doption for the southern portion of Route 125 was rescinded by the CTC in 1976 because there wes no funding and maintaining a route in an undeveloped area was considered premature. However, In 1984, the San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG) addad Route 125 South to the Regional Trensportation Plan IRTP) as part of San Diego County's future freeway system. The RTP establishes the San Diego region's 2o.year trIIinsport8tÏon plan based on population and employment projections. The plan assumed that Route 125 would be constructed on its previously adopted alignment. In 1988, the City of Chula Vista began studying an "Interim Road" project to be constructed as a prime arterial in a portion of the Route 125 South corridor. This effort was suspended when the Caltrans Headquarters office approved the Route 125 project for study in June 1988. In December 1988, a Notice of Initietion of Studies and Notice of Preparation were created and distributed. A Public Advisory Committee was established and the first meeting occurred in December 1988. /;2-3? ---------- ------- - ----------- - - ---------- -- ----------~~--~-------- 06/15/95 18:14 01 819 338 8123 crv PB SD 1iII004 -- BACKGROUND (continued! On January 12. 1989. the first public meeting was held to gather input on five conceptual alternatives for the project between Otay Lakes Road and Route 54. An additional altemative to the east of the Sweetwater Reservoir was submitted by a community group, as well es a proposal for a San Miguel Road interchange altemative location in Proctor Valley. ALTERNATIVES After stUdies and public review, Caltr"8ns selectad several altematives for more in- depth studies. Alternatives selected for more study would have substantial adverse impacts but are considered environmentelly deliverable and meet project objectives of service and reasonable cost. The environmental process and final route adoption are expected to be completed early in 1996. The environmental study will consider tollway, freeway, transit, Transportation Systems Management (TSM), and no-build alternatives. Caltrans has an extensive community outreach program, including a Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC). Recently, an alignment variation suggeeted by the CAC was added for full studies in the environmental document. Every effort will be made to reduce expected community character changes. TRAFFIC It Is estimated that in the future more than 200,000 vehicles per day will ultimately travel this section of Route 125 in the South Bay, and 160,000 on the section of Route 125 in Spring Valley. TOLLWAYIFUNDING On January 6. 1991, a franchise agreement was signed with Califomia Transportation Ventures (CTV), a private consortium, to develop Route 125 between Route 905 and San Miguel Roed as a tollway. If the portion of the project south of San Miguel Road were constructed as a toll road, it would be funded through private financing by CTV in order to begin operation in 1998. Construction of the section of Route 125 between San Miguel Road and Route 54 in Bonite is funded through the San Diego County sales tax TransNet funds. Through coordination among Caltrans, SANDAG, and CTV, construction and completion of the two projects should coincide. . The consortium will fund the franchised project, which is expected to cost in exC8as of $250 million, depending on the final alignment and interchange requirements of the highway. However. if the Freeway Instead of Tollwayaltemative were chosen, the portion south of San Miguel Road would remain unfunded and the project would not likely be constructed in the foreseeable future. . INTERCHANGES Initially. Route 125 will be constructed with Interchanges at Otay Mesa RoadlRoute 905, Oral'!ge Avenue, Telegraph Canyon Road, East H Street, San Miguel Ranch Road, and Route 54. Other interchanges are likely to be constructed after future development occurs. /;2~J? - ------------- u_------,., -.- -----------.,.------------.-- .._--------~-~-~--,...._-~------- q6/15/95 18:16 Vi 619 338 8123 CTV PB SD iI 005 . ~A\IE. I '\, - - :-:~ -:;' ---~ Alternative Alignment Segments . ",,;1 ' STATE ROLlE 125 SOUTII /.2-yJY' --------------..-- - ----_..~---~----~----,------,--,----------------- ~OO6 , ~6/15/95 ,18:17 ~1 619 338 8123, CTV PB, Si.I , . " ,-, , , " " "" " ,.,',', -- , " ..', /- ':",', " '-,"',.' ': '- -"",', - - ' , '. ,'- " , -:' Fact. About State "oute f. South 'tlle,San ~'flU.'AJtn..",rlcWÌl.Y'. ,.' - THE SAN MIGUEL M1N. PARKwAY is a 11,2 IIICb publiclpri~- ptoj~ iri IþeUpited~~:,' ' mile limìted~accesS highway which willnm from 5nan~g for the ptqjèct C:ombqaes PQÍ)Uc':fuilds, State Route 54 to Oray Mesa near the Mexican allocated from the loçaI 8a1e8~ ~~~. pro;.. ' border, Scheduled to open in late 1998. tbePai'kway sœm. ($60. mjlJjon» and $270 nûlIioQ,øf. private will befuitded by private c:çital, a $330 miiJjon capital,' - - ",' -;, :cash.investmentin San Ðiego's iDfrastructure, , " -',,',.', ' -,' '-,:-, ' ' , ,11Œ:SAN MlGUEL1.fI.N. PARK'VVA Ywill be " ,',' THE SAN MIGUEL M1N. PARKWAY will~ CODSlrUl(tedbYCalifomia'haJli¡parialioiiYentlires, '. " videa Vitalliuk in the north-sOuth riansportation Inc. (CTV>, a private CalifOniia CÌrpòœi!XI ~cIi. ' corridor for San Diego County. It will relievuntici- , holds the franclÌisefrOm Ça1rnnsto deliign;fÍllllnce; , , , pated congestion onnortb-south arterialstreets such ¥d. ~ and maintaiÌI the projeetior 35 ~, ' a SweêtwatlicRoad andOtay Lakes Road and on east-wesiarterialstlcetsin'SouthCountyareassucþ CI:V is Owuedby two iD~~ná1 CÔIiIpanies , as East HSIreet, Telegraph Canyon ~oad and Bonita - ' wbic!1Specialiže in IrJ!rispor!lltiOD enøneerin&:Par~ Road. :SODS ,B,rinck!lfboff, Inc,,', 8nilTran~ìrte , Jnten¡iI. lÌonal; 'S.A..Parscills,B1illC~ff; regàrded as~ ' , ' , TbeP ARKW A Y will help ,to, reduce, theSt!vere ", pmni~ ~itatioj¡ firmin theUnitedSbites,bas' . traffic congestion on Otay Mesa Road by, providing !leeR raiaked lIumber ô~jn traBSpørtat!OD by "Engi-, , ,adÌlilional access to -and from °laY Mesa ,and 'the lI'-¡ng-NewsReco~. for tbèp8at~ven yeaø: iDtemational border crossing to Mexico. It will alsO He¡¡cIq\lartmed iri Paris,_FraDee. TI'IDSIywe1ìls the , , provide a limited access highway alternative to East èxperience of develQping and ~ting,over 3.000 - LaiCe,SaitCree.k,thenewOiympicTrainingCenrec. ' 1llÌ1~ of toll roadS, worldwide. -. , - and other residential, COlllli1ercial ~dindustrial ',- '-. ' . . .' , - -, " . areas'of easfChuia Visla IiDd San DiegoCoUDty, THE ~AN MIGUEL M'FN.PARKWAY Will ~i - . , . , , '.", ;thèstandtrctføi-bíÌhwaYSiritheU;S.in~:.nexL' " The PARKWAY will Îllitially be a fQur-Ianè limo ' .centurybj incotpOmmg,s~f"thNit~I"' ited accesshighway~ Sufficient width will be pro- , ogy. ,The rOed~sautomatic ,vehicle ,ideÞtifi~OI!; , vicled for future acèommodationof four additional ,~ coupled witbothcr "high cech" ÙIIIoYà~ons' - ll'afficlanesaitdeithertwohighoccupancyvebicle ,willenablem~orists,to paY~l1sby:~~c lanes or1ight railtrBnsit. ' ' ':tr8lisfer Witbout havin¡. to stop or even JioW clown ' ,,'" ','. . ,.atátOlllKiò1b,tbuSavoiding,deiayS~~.se.#ò,j¡" ' Tbe PARKWAY.ìsbeing joinilYl'lanned,by , ," '-:", ,- . ',Ca1Iràns,SANDAGand CI:V and will be tbethird , " , C AL IF OR N fA TR AN SPO.RT'A,T I<ON ,VENT.U,R ~ S"N"6:":, , ...., ,,-"r~ .... ,'-,', c.,;" ',-- .. "./.2--J(z.::---',,",~, ,'..0.", ~-~-- ~6/ 15/95 18:19 "1 ~19 338 8123 CTV PB SD , iI 007 " , , -' ,--,' . ", "- " ,;' . °- , ,-- ,', .! ,;' : '" .. -'. .. -, -", ~- - :.,-' -- , - -' , -' , Ben.flts 01 ftatfJRout.'125 Soúth.,.;.. ""';'~.II'¡~"""~.'~,,,,!,,' " , 'l1œSANMlGUELtd'lN.PARKWAYwillåccom- " Opciationd~,~y'~iÌiiiiSÌ1y ;", ,'mociatèfuniretnffjc!batWo.ildothawi8èUSe~tåDa- èæal&70ilìØlocaljObs.~tQi~o~"" ti~~tberebyimproviogcln:ulaliori;IraVel ti¡ncs _35 yearlifè of1befrandlise.'" ',' and ~ on ægiona1 rœMys ÍIiId c:ïty streets. , The ~ ~of tiiu~ID'~ &nit toiL THE SAN MIGUEL MTN. PARK\VAYwiII im- boo1hareasofdlePARKW~'YWiIlbè~plish8d,;. . ProveJeÌponse.timeford1ebigbWaypøuÕl.poIiœ,fiæ widllI8!ivepl~andgr&ssel!to~ibeViewof . .. and othef emergency vehìciès thrOughoUt the Soulb , the P ARKW~ y' imcI1ÌIe-Vfèw ~ tbe PARKWAY: , " County ~dor, In 15 DIIIIIYan:as as pO&sibIe,Jand~".pe(n8inswjU be , --' , , used topro¥icSC twual'and IOIQIdbllltiet,fotlhec .- '~'~ " DWgnalion of THE SAN MIGUEL MIN,PARK-' roidwayó" ' ,,- ,', W ,. Y as Ii, toll road will c;nsure !bat thoSe who use the , .. -i, , -' -, - roadway will pay 1beir fair share ofbighwa.y Cosin.nd THE SAN MIGUEL MTN.'- P A"B¥..W AY will inœt.; " ,,' , that die roadway will not be a ~on_local taxpay- porate a ~ of die art etedrOnic iou, co1Iectkiri and GS:Thosewþøchosenot,io usedle_1\eW tOllway " lriffic mäiIagement~ whicli ,i11owstoU ,coUee- ", because of ,die toUswill also benefii from œduœd lion únoniia1 bi~:~. :1bui.\Ì~ the. ttaftic ~d shcIrIer.lravelthnes on ihe aI~ve free delaysandaJDFSlion ofll'ldiliona1 fòU plazas and '. routes, ' re4ucíng air J1OU.. TI¡é II!Í~. ~ol!ISY \Vi!l' !.. , also provide1be çoiIvenienœ ofalitpm8iic j¡ayïnelitof, THE SAN MIGUEL MTN ,P ARKw A Y is anÏßDova- !be tolls monthly by i mdit ~ debit Wd; users to 'be ' live publici private partnership which will be funded . provided will! ,MUIar!y u¡xJaœd llâf6çüdmnanôn:, " by II $,330 million cash investment in San Diego's vital and faSt rOadside aSsisIaDce or~~ëC in ~ 11Iisinfusion of private capital will case ohchic1ebRakdoWu (r accident ' , ' '~le SanÌ>iego tomaintaln ~ exc:eI1ent 1riuIsporta- ,,:' ': ' ..',. - .,',,-' , lion system witho~ an ~ in local JJr state taxes. CoosIJuclÎoo of,liIè P~AY Will ~ptop,., , -- , at)' values m.m corridçIr !Ii iIçrovjrig8lD&S:a¥ ' Overall, the conSlÎuction ,and opeRtÏon of THE SAN ,~gtrave1_, ' ' ". " ' MIGUEL M'IN. P ARKW A Y will provide a Iobll of A ~8lion linè Will be avaUablèfÌ:rØJe durition ò( , 6SO other direct andindilect job oppoI:tIIDitïes for San Diego County, . ' tile ~ pr¡x:essio '~nd ,~Iy to ' , . c:onsttUction of !he inilial phase of ihe project conceiIis 1eIa1ÎD8 to conili'llCljOli. pUbJicsafetyèt". " . will create more dum SOO diIm loéaI jobs òver . oi!Ierjssuespenainingto~On~f!hePARJ{~ ' ". - II two Yl!'ar period. WAY,' , .. ':,:,;;,,- ""~,, CALIFORNIA TRAN$PORTAitON' VENTVR'e'S"INC, "--, -'.-" _Go_..... .. --e /a2--;/tP..." ,,- ',' ':-- " ~ " - ----~--,--- -..,-....-..-----..----------- - - --------------------..--,....-------------.. RESOLUTION NO. / 79tJ.5 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE PROPOSAL TO FUND THE SAN MIGUEL CONNECTOR FROM TRANSNET FUNDS AS A SCALED DOWN PROJECT SUBJECT TO IT BEING CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULE FOR ST-125 SOUTH SECTION AND SUBJECT TO THE SR-125 SWEETWATER SECTION BEING CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADOPTED PLAN OF FINANCE WHEREAS, the San Miguel Connector is currently in the SANDAG plan of finance listed as payments to CTVover a ten period between 1999 and 2008; and WHEREAS, CTV would build the facility and get reimbursed from Transnet, however, if the program funding dries out early, CTV would not get reimbursed; and WHEREAS, the Transnet Subcommittee report discusses the status of the Transnet Highway Project Schedules and a proposed agreement by CTV to advance the funding for the San Miguel Connector, but not at full funding; and WHEREAS, SANDAG and CTV staff are making further efforts to address the concerns of the subcommittee which concerns involve the impacts on other projects, uncertainty of other outside funding, and the fact that since the Bonita group does not want ramps at San Miguel Road there will be some sort of toll for the people that get on and off the first ramps south of SR-54; and WHEREAS, staff believes that funding must remain for this connector project and SR-l25 (Sweetwater) for the following reasons: GENERAL PLAN This north/south facility is the only major facility east of 1-805 that will traverse through Chula vista between Otay Mesa and SR-54. The General Plan for Chula vista bases the success of the traffic analysis on the construction of a north/south facility for the ultimate buildout. BONITA ROADS If the San Miguel Connector is not built, then the Traffic will have to snake through rural Bonita roads to get to SR-54. Traffic studies have indicated without the connector and Freeway/Tollway traffic on the local roads will greatly increase. The connector will allow northbound trips to the northeast of Chula vista to avoid the Bonita Streets and yet not have to go 15 miles out of direction. I,},/} -/ ,- . ECONOMIC DEV. For the ability to develop parcels in the Eastlake Business Center, Rancho del Rey, and otay Ranch, it is vitally important to have SR-J.25 constructed between SR-54 and Otay Mesa. It has been stated by the Chamber of Commerce Manager that SR-125 is an important factor in attracting jobs into eastern area of Chula vista. FUNDING This connector is really a leverage of public funds in the ratio of 5 to 1 to provide for a road system. otherwise, for $60 million of public funds, the region ends up with a transportation facility worth $300 million. The ability of private enterprize to build and finance a $300 million road in a developing area is risky and difficult to accomplish. There is the possibility that CTV may not be able to finance the project on their original schedule. It could be constructed later as a toll road or much later possibly as a freeway. In any event, the connector is needed by the year 2000, to connect the northeasterly eastern area traffic without traversing through the rural Bonita Roads. without some major funding changes to the state Transportation Program, there will not be available funding for SR-125 South for many years to come. Even though all local parties would like a freeway instead of a Toll Road, the real life financial future is that a freeway is not a short term accomplishment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby support the proposal to fund the San Miguel Connector from Transnet Funds as a scaled down project subject to it being constructed in accordance with the schedule for SR-125 South section and subject to the SR-125 Sweetwater section being constructed in accordance with adopted Plan of Finance. Presented by Approved as to form by Clvv- ~ ~ John P. Lippitt, Director of Bruce M. Boo aard, City Public Works Attorney c: \rs\SR125 );2;9,e1. MARKED TO SHOW CHANGES Agenda Item No. 12 RESOLUTION NO. 17945 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE PROPOSAL TO MAINTAIN FUNDING OF THE SAN MIGUEL CONNECTOR FROM TRANSNET FUNDS 1\.0 1. CCALED DOlIN PROJECT OUBJECT TO IT BEING CONCTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULE FOR SR-125 SOUTH CECTION AND URGING SANDAG TO FUND THE CUBJECT TO TilE SR- 125 SWEETWATER SECTION BEING Cm¡OTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS ADOPTED PLAN OF FINANCE WHEREAS. failure to construct the San Miquel Connector in a timelY manner will delay construction of SR 125: and WHEREAS. SR-125 will relieve forecasted conqestion on north-south arterial streets such as Sweetwater Road and Otav Lakes Road. and east west arterial streets such as East H Street. Teleqraph Canyon Road and Bonita Road: and WHEREAS. passaqe and implementation of the North American Free Trade Aqreement (NAFTA) will increase commerce and trade between Mexico and the San Dieqo reqion: and WHEREAS. SR-125 will improve response time for hiqhway patrol. police. fire and other emerqencv vehicles throuqhout South Countv: and WHEREAS. the San Miquel Connector is a key TransNet transportation link in the SR-125 reqional transportation system: and WHEREAS, the San Miguel Connector is currently in the SANDAG plan of finance listed as payments to CTV over a ten year period between 1999 and 2008; and WHEREAS, CTV would build the facility and get reimbursed from Transnet, hmlever, if tae ~re<Jram fuf!dif!<J dries out early, GT\' \J8ulà not <Jet reimburGeà; and WHEREAS, the Transnet Subcommittee report discusses the status of the Transnet Highway Project Schedules and a proposed agreement by CTV to advance the funding for the San Miguel Connector, but not at full funding; and WHEREAS, SANDAG and CTV staff are making further efforts to address the concerns of the subcommittee which concerns involve the impacts on other projects, uncertainty gf other outside ,'LL' ;Ü, '-V '""U/VQ - , '.I,. /:2 /7 -3 within Bonita/Sprinq Valley does not want ramps at San Miguel Road there will be some sort of toll for the ~eo~le that ~et OR aRà off the firat ram~a aouth of OR 54 no access and eqress from the connector other than the toll road; and WHEREAS, staff believes that funding must remain for this connector project and SR-125 (Sweetwater) for the following reasons: GENERAL PLAN This north/south facility is the only major facility east of 1-805 that will traverse through Chula vista between Otay Mesa and SR-54. The General Plan for Chula vista bases the success of the traffic analysis on the construction of a north/south facility for the ultimate buildout. BONITA ROADS If the San Miguel Connector is not built, then the Traffic will have to snake through rural Bonita roads to get to SR-54. Traffic studies have indicated without the connector and Freeway/Tollway traffic on the local roads will greatly increase. The connector will allow northbound trips to the northeast of Chula vista to avoid the Bonita Streets and yet not have to go 15 miles out of direction. ECONOMIC DEV. For the ability to develop parcels in the Eastlake Business Center, Rancho del Rey, and otay Ranch, it is vitally important to have SR-125 constructed between SR-54 and otay Mesa. It has been stated by the Chamber of Commerce Manager that SR-125 is an important factor in attracting jobs into eastern area of Chula vista. FUNDING This connector is really a leverage of public funds in the ratio of 5 to 1 to provide for a road system. Otherwise, for $60 million of public funds, the region ends up with a transportation facility worth $300 million. The ability of private enterprize to build and finance a $300 million road in a developing area is risky and difficult to accomplish. There is the possibility that CTV may not be able to finance the project on their original schedule. It could be constructed later as a toll road or much later possibly as a freeway. In any event, the connector is needed by the year 2000, to connect the northeasterly eastern area traffic without traversing through the rural Bonita Roads. without some major funding changes to the state Transportation Program, there will not be available funding for SR-125 South for many years to come. Even though all local parties would like a freeway J;¿ /j -( .'. instead of a Toll Road, the real life financial future is that a freeway is not a short term accomplishment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby support the proposal to maintain the fundinq of the San Miguel Connector from Transnet Funds as-a Gcaleà ào\/n pFoject Gasject to it scin~ oonGtFuotcà in accordance with the schedule for SR-125 South~ Ccctien and Gusjcot to The city council urqes SANDAG to fund the SR-125 Sweetwater section ~ constructed in accordance with adopted Plan of Finance. Presented by Approved as to form by ~ 11;(~ ~ John P. Lippitt, Director of Bruce M. Boogaard, City Public Works Attorney C:\rs\SR125 ""--~---- RESOLUTION NO. /?7'1v - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION VENTURES TO CONSTRUCT SR-125 BETWEEN SR-905 AND SR-54 WHEREAS, it is very important that the segment of SR-125 between SR-54 and SR-94 be built within the SANDAG plan of finance by the year 2003; and WHEREAS, without this link, the transportation plan and the funding scenario for the Toll Road may not be successful; and WHEREAS, staff hereby supports the construction of the Toll Road by CTV in a timely manner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby support the efforts of California Transportation Ventures to construct SR-125 between SR-905 and SR- 54. Such support shall not be deemed to imply any requirement for a financial contribution by the city to the project. Presented by Approved as to form by B~~a~'-: ~ John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works Attorney C:\rs\SR125 ;:<ß -I )~ etZ '~n(2 MARKED TO SHOW CHANGES Agenda Item No. 12 RESOLUTION NO. 17946 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION VENTURES TO CONSTRUCT SR-125 BETWEEN SR-905 AND SR-54 WHEREAS. on September 14. 1990 the Governor of the State of California desiqnated SR 125 as an historic public-private partnership facility; and WHEREAS. Caltrans executed a franchise aqreement with California Transportation venture for the eventual construction of a SR-125 limited access toll hiqhway with free hiqh occupancy vehicle lanes; and WHEREAS. SR-125 will provide a vital link in north/south transportation corridor for San Dieqo Countv; and WHEREAS. SR-125 will relieve forecasted conqestion on north-south arterial streets such as Sweetwater Road and Otay Lakes road. and east west arterial streets such as East H Street. Teleqraph Canyon Road and Bonita Road; and WHEREAS. passaqe and implementation of the North American Free Trade Aqreement (NAFTA) will increase commerce and trade between Mexico and the San Dieqo reqion and the need for SR-125; and WHEREAS. SR-125 will help reduce severe traffic conqestion on the Otay Mesa Road by providinq additional access to and for Otay Mesa and the international border crossinq; and WHEREAS. SR-125 will provide improved access to the ARCO Olvmpic Traininq Center and other commercial residential and industrial areas in the Eastern Chula vista Territories; and WHEREAS. SR-125 will improve response time for hiqhway patrol. police. fire and other emerqency vehicles throuqhout South County; and WHEREAS. SR-125 is an innovative public/private partnership which will be funded by a $330.000.000 private sector cash investment; and WHEREAS. the construction and completion of SR-125 is a necessary facility to continue to attract iobs to Chula Vista. South County and the San Dieqo reqion: and J.J.ß-- J WHEREAS, it is very important that the segment of SR-l25 between SR-54 and SR-94 be built within the SANDAG plan of finance by the year 2003; and WHEREAS, without this link, the transportation plan and the funding scenario for the Toll Road may not be successful; and WHEREAS, staff hereby supports the construction of the Toll Road by CTV in a timely manner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby support the efforts of California Transportation Ventures to construct SR-l25 between SR-905 and SR- 54. Such support shall not be deemed to imply any requirement for a financial contribution by the city to the project. Presented by Approved as to form by ~~fh- John P. Lippitt, Director of Bruce M. Boogaard, cit Public Works Attorney /;2!J-'Y d.-L/o ...--.-_u.-.