Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix H.3 - Davies Soil and Groundwater Sampling ReportSoil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition 4501 Otay Valley Road Chula Vista, California Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 November 3, 2006 Pardee Homes 12626 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100 San Diego, California 92130 Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services November 3, 2006 Mr. Allen Kashani Pardee Homes 12626 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100 San Diego, California 92130 Subject: Mr. Kashani: Soil and Water Sampling Report Davies Acquisition 4501 Otay Valley Road Chula Vista, California Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 Converse Consultants (Converse) is pleased to submit the attached Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report which summarizes the activities and the analytical results of soil and water samples collected at the above referenced site in general accordance with our Work Order dated July 14, 2003. Dist.:2/Addressee ft Priflledon Norman S. Eke Managing Officer 222 East Huntington Drive, Suite 211, Monrovia, California 91016-3500 \.1=""' Telephone: (626) 930-1200 ♦ Facsimile: (626) 930-1212 ♦ e-mail: converse@converseconsultants.com Table of Contents Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 Page 1.0 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SCOPE OF .SERVICES .......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Objective ............... ; ...................................................................................... 2 2.2 Sampling Protocol and Methodology ........................................................... 2 3.0 SITE SAMPLING .................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Areas of Concern (AOC) .............................................................................. 4 3.2 Field Sampling Activities, July 2003 ............................................................. 5 3.3 Field Sampling Activities, September 2003 ................................................. 9 4.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ........................................................................................ 13 4.1 July 2003 Sample Analytical Results ........................................................... 13 4.1. 1 AOC-1 ....................................................................................................... 13 4.1.2 AOC-2 ....................................................................................................... 15 4.1.3 AOC-3 ....................................................................................................... 16 4.1.4 AOC-4 ....................................................................................................... 17 4.2 September 2003 Sample Analytical Results ................................................ 20 4.2.1 AOC-1 ....................................................................................................... 20 4.2.2 AOC-2 ....................................................................................................... 20 4.2.3 AOC-3 ....................................................................................................... 21 4.2.4 AOC-4 ....................................................................................................... 21 5.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS ........................................................................ 23 @ Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 I Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 FIGURES: FIGURE 1 Areas of Concern FIGURE 2 Area of Concern 1 FIGURE 3 Area of Concern 2 FIGURE 4 Area of Concern 3 FIGURE 5 Area of Concern 4 TABLES: TABLE 1 Soil Sample TPH Analytical Results TABLE 2 Soil Sample Metals Analytical Results TABLE 3 Soil Sample Metals STLC Analytical Results TABLE 4 Soil Sample Metals TCLP Analytical Results TABLE 5 Soil Sample Pesticide and Herbicide Analytical Results TABLE 6 Soil Sample voe and SVOC Analytical Results TABLE 7 Soil Sample Coliform Analytical Results TABLE 8 Soil Sample PCB Analytical Results TABLE 9 Soil Sample PAHs Analytical Results TABLE 10 Water Sample TPH Analytical Results TABLE 11 Water Sample Metals Analytical Results TABLE 12 Water Sample voe and SVOC Analytical Results TABLE 13 Water Sample Coliform Analytical Results APPENDIX A-Boring and Trench Logs (on CD) APPENDIX B -Laboratory Analytical Reports (on CD) @ Converse Project No. 02~41 ~346~02 ii 1.0 Background Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 The subject property (herein referred to as Property) is comprised of one (1) irregular- shaped parcel of land occupying approximately 8-acres. The Phase I ESA Report, prepared by Converse in April 2003, identified the Property to be occupied by the following: two (2) towing/auto salvage yards (Lora's Towing and Monroy's Towing), a portable storage bin lot, porta potties, and portable classrooms (Lamar Portable Toilets and Classrooms). During the Phase I ESA, Converse identified the following recognized environmental conditions (REC's): • Aerial photos indicated that the western portion of the Property was agricultural as early as 1928 to at least 1983. • In the early 1980s a San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Cleanup and Abatement (C&A) Order was issued to the Property for disposal of toxic and hazardous materials on-site. The RWQCB issued a No Further Action (NFA) letter in 1984 after soil sampling indicated the Property was not contaminated by hazardous materials. • In August 1986, during a geotechnical investigation, C.H. Wood and Associates reported the presence of burn-ash in a pit excavated on the central portion of the Property. • In the late 1980s, the San Diego RWQCB issued C&A Order 81-27 to adequately characterize sandblast grit fill material with respect to potential impacts to water resources in the area. Water samples collected in 1988 and 1989 from three monitoring wells on the northern portion of the Property revealed low quantities of metals. The Property owner placed a cap on the fill and constructed a ditch around it to prevent intrusion of storm water runoff. The RWQCB considered C&A Order 8f-27 to be satisfied in July 1990. • During the April 2003 Phase I Property reconnaissance Converse observed the following : 55-gallon drums leaking waste oil, an exterior paint spray booth area, railroad ties, various auto-body and engine parts, porta potties, leaking car batteries, and a burn ash pile on the eastern adjacent property approximately 25-feet east of the Property's western boundary line. • The Phase I ESA recommended soil sampling, groundwater sampling, and surficial water and soil "grab" sampling to further assess potential impacts from the RECs listed above. The Phase I ESA also recommended evaluation of Border Zone issues relative to burn ash at the eastern adjacent property, as well as asbestos and a lead-base paint survey on the Property. Based on the above recommendations, Converse completed soil and groundwater sampling activities at the site from July to September 2003 . This report summarizes these activities and the soil and groundwater sample analytical results. @ Converse Project No. 02-41 '-346-02 1 2.0 Scope of Services 2. 1 Objective Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 The objective of this report is to present soil and groundwater sampling activities and analytical results. Based on the uses of the site at the time of sampling, soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for one or more of the following. • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline (g) and/or carbon chain (cc); • TPH modified for Ethylene Glycol; • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs); • Semi Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs); • Organochlorine Pesticides; • Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); • Organophosphorus Pesticides; • Chlorinated Herbicides; • PAHs; • pH; • Title 22 Metals; and • Total and Fecal Coliform, and Disinfectants (Bromate, Chlorite, Chlorine Dioxide, Free Chlorine, Total Chlorine). 2.2 Sampling Protocol and Methodology On July 24 and 25, 2003, twenty (20) geoprobe direct-push borings (including step- out borings) and two (2) hand auger borings were advanced on the Property to a maximum depth of 19-feet below ground surface (bgs). Six (6) exploratory backhoe trenches were excavated to a maximum depth of 17-feet bgs. Soil samples were collected at depths ranging from 0.5-feet and 19-feet bgs. Four (4) surface soil grab samples, three (3) surface water grab samples, and two (2) river bottom sediment samples were also collected. On September 2 and 3, 2003, fourteen (14) Stanley rig direct-push borings (including step-out samples) were advanced on the Property to a maximum depth of 20-feet bgs. Seven (7) exploratory backhoe trenches were also excavated to a maximum depth of 15-feet bgs. Soil samples were collected at depths ranging from 0.5-feet to 20-feet bgs. Four (4) surface soil grab samples were also collected. Converse used Geoprobe and Stanley direct push drill rigs to complete soil borings and collect soil samples from each boring. The borings were completed using a steel rod which was hydraulically advanced into the soil to the desired sample @ Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 2 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 depth. A closed end sampler with an acetate liner was then advanced at the end of the rod to collect the soil sample. Upon reaching the intended sample depth, the sampler pin was unlocked to open the sampler, which was driven an additional 2- feet into the soil. The sampler was then raised to the ground surface and the soil sample was retrieved. A portion of each soil sample was removed from the liner and placed into a plastic bag and allowed to volatilize. Each bagged sample was screened with a photoionization detector (PIO) for voes, and then visually inspected. Samples for voe analysis were collected using EPA Method 5035 to extract a sub- sample from the sample in the acetate liner. The remaining sample in the liner was capped, labeled, and placed in an ice chest for transport, under chain of custody documentation, to Associated Laboratories. Before each use, all drilling and sampling equipment was cleaned, double rinsed with tap water and final rinsed with distilled water, to reduce the potential for cross- contamination. Bore holes were backfilled with hydrated bentonite and the ground surface was restored to match the existing grade. Samples were collected from the excavated test pits using the backhoe. The samples were collected by hand from the backhoe bucket in 4-ounce glass jars, which were labeled, and placed into an ice chest for transport, under chain of custody documentation, to Associated Laboratories. Upon completion of each excavation, the test pits were backfilled with the excavated soil. @ Converse Project No. 02-41 ~346-02 3 3.0 Site Sampling 3.1 Areas of Concern (AOC) Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 The Property was subdivided into areas of potential environmental concern and sampled by area. These AOCs are shown on Figure 1 and the sample locations are shown on Figures 2 through 5. A brief description of the AOCs sampled is presented below. AOC-1 AOC-1 is located on the southwest and western portions of the Property and is occupied by a commercial auto towing and storage yard (Monroy's Towing), and the dry Otay River bed. Identified recognized environmental concerns (RECs) included used car batteries, leaking containers of waste oil, historical agricultural use, auto storage and repair, 55-gallon drums of unidentified liquid, and potential impacts from dumping into the river from upstream sources. AOC-2 AOC-2 is located on the central portion of the Property. AOC-2 is occupied by a commercial towing yard (Lora's Towing), two (2) associated auto storage areas, an access bridge, and a portion of the Otay River. Identified RECs include leaking 55-gallon drums of waste oil, the presence of burn ash, auto storage and repair, and fill material containing sandblast grit and debris. AOC-3 AOC-3 is located on the eastern-central portion of the Property and is occupied by a portable toilet and portable office storage yard, and a portion of the Otay River . Identified RECs included storage of portable toilets, potential for buried burn ash, and fill material containing debris and sandblast grit. AOC-4 AOC-4 is located on the eastern portion of the Property. AOC-4 is occupied by a storage lot for storage bins. Identified RECs included railroad ties, buried sandblast grit and debris, and potential for burn ash . @ Converse Project No. 02-41 -'346~02 -4 3.2 Field Sampling Activities, July 2003 AOC-1 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 Four (4) surface grab samples (GS-1, -2, -3, -4) were .collected in the northern portion of AOC-1 in the dry riverbed. Three (3) direct-push borings (GP-12, -13, and -18) were advanced to a maximum depth of 10-feet below the ground surface (bgs) in the vicinity of a paint spray area, and two (2) auto and auto part/debris storage areas (GP-12, -18), located along the northern portion of Monroy's Towing. During drilling, soil samples were collected at 2- feet, 5-feet, and 10-feet below ground surface (bgs). The samples were analyzed as indicated below: • GS-1, -2, -3, -4: The samples were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorous pesticides, chlorinated herbicides, and Cam 17 metals. Sample GS-1 was also analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-cc) carbon chain. • GP-12: The 2-foot sample and the 5-foot sample were analyzed for TPH-cc, total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Cam 17 Metals, and PCBs. Due to refusal at a depth of 6.5 feet bgs, no sample was collected from GP-12 at 10-feet. • GP-13: The 2-foot sample and the 5-foot sample were analyzed for Cam 17 metals and VOCs, and the 10-foot sample was archived. • GP-18: The 2-foot sample and the 5-foot sample were analyzed for TPHcc, TPHg, voes, Cam 17 metals, and PCBs. The 10-foot sample was archived. Four (4) direct-push borings (GP-9, GP-10, GP-11, and GP-17) and two (2) hand auger borings (HA-6 and HA-7) were advanced to a maximum depth of 10-feet bgs. These borings were located in areas of historical agricultural use, auto and auto part /debris storage areas, 5-gallon containers of waste oil; and used car batteries. During drilling, soil samples were collected from depths of 0.5-feet, 2-feet, 5-feet, and 10-feet bgs. The samples were analyzed as indicated below. • Samples GP-9 @ 0.5', GP-9 @ 2, GP-10@ 2' and GP-10 @5' were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorous pesticides, chlorinated herbicides. GP-9@ 2', GP-10@ 2' and GP-10 @} Converse Project No : 02~41-346-02 5 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 @5' were also analyzed for TPHcc, TPHg, voes, and PeBs. The 10- foot samples from Borings GP-9 and GP-10 were archived. • Sample GP-11 @ 0.5' was analyzed for organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorous pesticides, and chlorinated herbicides. Sample GP-11 @ 2' was analyzed for TPHcc, TPHg, organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorous pesticides, chlorinated herbicides, voes, and PCBs. The 5-foot sample was analyzed for TPHcc, TPH-g, VOCs, and PCBs. The 10-foot sample from this boring was archived. • Sample GP-17@ 0.5' was analyzed for metals and pH. Samples from boring GP-17 were not collected from depths of 2-feet, 5-feet, and 10- feet were not collected due to refusal encountered in the boring. • Samples HA-6 @ 0.5' and HA-6 @ 2' were analyzed for TPHcc, SVOCs, and VOCs. The 5-foot and 10-foot samples we.re archived. • Samples HA-7 @ 0.5' and HA-7 @ 2' were analyzed for Cam 17 metals and pH. The 5-foot and 10-foot samples were not collected from this boring due to refusal encountered during drilling. AOC-2 One (1) water grab sample (WA-1), and one (1) river bottom sediment sample (SS-1) were collected from the Otay River on the northern portion of this area. A total of five (5) Direct-push borings (GP-4, -5, -6, -7, -8) were advanced to a maximum depth of approximately 16.5-feet bgs, in the vicinity of: 55-gallon drums of waste oil, auto and auto parts/debris storage (GP-5), historical anti-freeze storage and current auto and auto parts/debris storage (GP-6 and GP-7), auto and auto part/debris storage, and potential buried burn ash (GP-4, GP-8). AOC-2 is located at Lora's Towing, which includes two (2) associated auto and auto part/debris storage yards adjacent and contiguous to the west. The samples collected from these areas were analyzed as indicated below. • River water sample WA-1 and river bottom sample SS-1 was analyzed for TPHcc, voes, SVOCs, and Cam 17 metals. • The 2-foot, 5-foot, and 10-foot samples from boring GP-4 were analyzed for Cam 17 metals and pH. The 15-foot sample was archived. • Soil samples collected from boring GP-5 at depths of approximately 2- feet and 5-feet were analyzed for Cam 17 metals and TPHcc. The 10- foot sample was archived . . @ Converse Project No .· 02-41-346-02 6 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 • Soil samples collected from borings GP-6 and GP-7 from depths of approximately 2-feet and 5-feet were analyzed for TPH-c-c, ethylene glycol, and Cam 17 metals. A sample was not collected from boring GP-7 due to refusal. The 10 and 15-foot samples from boring GP-6 were archived. • The 2-foot, 5-foot and 10-foot samples from boring GP-8 were analyzed for TPHcc, TPHg, VOCs, Cam 17 metals, and PCBs. The 15-foot sample was archived AOC-3 One (1) water grab sample (WA-3) was collected and one (1) direct-push boring (GP-14) was advanced in the northern-central portion of AOC-3 in the immediate vicinity of the portable toilet storage area . Samples were collected from the ground surface (GP-14), 0.5-feet bgs and 5-feet bgs. The samples were analyzed as indicated below. • Groundwater sample WA-3 was analyzed for disinfectants, and total and fecal coliform. • The 0.5-foot and 2-foot samples collected from boring GP-14 were analyzed for disinfectants, and total and fecal coliform. The 5-foot sample from this boring was archived. One (1) backhoe trench (TP-6) was excavated on the central portion of AOC- 3 so that the subsurface soils in this area could be observed for indications of burn ash material. The trench was excavated parallel to the southern boundary of the Property, for a distance of approximately 8 to 10-feet. TP-6 was terminated at a maximum depth of approximately 8-feet bgs when refusal was encountered. One (1) sample was collected from TP-6 at a depth of approximately 8-feet bgs . This sample was analyzed for Cam 17 metals and pH. No visual indicators (such as glass shards or gray ash material) were observed in TP-6 during trenching and sampling activities. AOC-4 One (1) water grab sample (WA-2), one (1) river bottom sediment sample (SS-2) were collected, and five (5) direct-push borings (GP-1, -2, -3, -15, -16) were advanced to a maximum depth of approximately 19-feet bgs . Water sample WA-2 and sediment sample SS-3 were collected approximately 30- feet north of the northeastern corner of the Property. Borings GP-1, -2, and - 3 were advanced along the eastern boundary of the Property in the vicinity of burn ash located on the eastern adjacent property. GP-15 and GP-16 were advanced in the immediate vicinity of railroad ties located at the southeastern corner of the Property. During drilling of these borings, soil samples were @ Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 7 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 collected at depths of approximately 0.5-feet, 2-feet, 5-feet, 10-feet, and 15- feet bgs. These samples were analyzed as indicated below. • Samples WA-2 and SS-2 were analyzed for TPHcc, VOCs, SVOCs, and Cam 17 metals. • The 2-foot, 5-foot, 10-foot, and 15-foot samples from boring GP-1 were analyzed for pH and Cam 17 metals. A sample collected from a depth of approximately 19 feet bgs was archived. • The 2-foot and 5-foot samples from boring GP-2 were analyzed for Cam 17 metals and pH. The 10-foot and 15-foot samples from this boring were archived. • Samples were collected at 2-feet and 5-feet bgs from boring GP-3. Samples were not collected at 10-feet and 15-feet bgs due to refusal. The 2-foot and 5-foot samples were analyzed for Cam 17 metals and pH. • Soil samples were collected at 0.5-feet, 2-feet, and 5-feet bgs in boring GP-15 and 0.5-feet, 2-feet, 5-feet and 10-feet in boring GP-16. Samples collected at 0.5-feet and 2-feet bgs from these borings were analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and Cam 17 metals. The 5 and 10-foot samples were archived. Five (5) exploratory backhoe trenches (TP-1, -2, -3, -4, -5), approximately 8 to 10 feet long were excavated at various locations throughout AOC-4 to observe the subsurface soil for indications of potential for burn ash material. All samples collected from TP-1 through TP-5 were analyzed for Cam 17 Metals and pH. The trench excavation and sampling activities are summarized below. • Trench TP-1 was excavated on the eastern portion of AOC-4, near the eastern boundary of the Property, parallel to the southern boundary of the Property. Soil samples were collected at depths of approximately 3-feet bgs and 11-feet bgs. The excavation was terminated at a depth of approximately 12.5-feet bgs due to caving. Burn ash was observed at a depth of approximately 3-feet bgs. • Trench TP-2 was excavated on the central portion of AOC-4, parallel to the southern boundary of the Property, to a maximum depth of approximately 17-feet bgs. Soil samples were collected at depths of approximately 4-feet, 8.5-feet and 16-feet bgs. These three samples were analyzed for Cam 17 metals and pH. Burn ash was observed at a depth of approximately 4-feet bgs. @ Converse Project No. 02-41-346·~02 8 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 • Trench TP-3 was excavated at the northwest corner of AOC-4, parallel to the northern boundary of the Property. Soil samples were collected at 2-feet and 5-feet bgs. These two samples were analyzed for Cam 17 metals and pH. Trace amounts of burn ash were observed at a depth of approximately 5-feet bgs. • Trench TP-4 was excavated on the southwestern portion of AOC-4, parallel to the eastern boundary of the Property, to a maximum depth of 15-feet bgs. One (1) soil sample was collected at a depth of 2-feet bgs and analyzed for Cam 17 metals and pH. Burn ash was not observed in TP-4. • Trench TP-5 was excavated on the western central portion of AOC-4, parallel to the southern boundary of the Property, to a maximum depth of 13-feet bgs. Soil samples were collected at 6-feet bgs and 11-feet bgs and analyzed for Cam 17 metals and pH. Burn ash was not observed in TP-5. 3.3 Field Sampling Activities, September 2003 Soil borings GP-19, GP-20, GP-21 and GP-22 were completed on an adjacent property to south of the subject site concurrently with the September 2003 sampling activities at the Davies property. The completion of these borings and the analysis of the soil samples collected from these borings are not a part of this report and will be provided under separate cover. AOC-1 A total of three (3) direct-push borings (GP-26, GP-31, and -34) were advanced on the northeastern portion of Monroy's Towing to a maximum depth of 15-feet bgs. These step-out borings were • completed based on elevated levels of TPH detected in GP-18 during the initial sampling in July 2003. Soil samples were collected at 2-feet, 5-feet, 10-feet, and 15-feet bgs and were analyzed as indicated below. • GP-26: The 5-foot and 15-foot samples were analyzed for TPHcc. The 2-foot and 10-foot samples were archived. • GP-31: The 5-foot sample was analyzed for TPHcc. The 2-foot sample was archived. Due to refusal encountered during drilling, the boring was moved approximately 1-foot to the south completed to a depth of 10 feet as Boring GP-31a. One sample was collected from Boring 31a at a depth of 10-feet and analyzed for TPHcc. • GP-34: The 5-foot and 10-foot samples were analyzed for TPHcc, and the 2-foot sample was archived. @ Converse Project No: 02-41 ~346~02 9 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 Three (3) exploratory trenches (TP-10, TP-12, and TP-16) were excavated and observed for visual indications of burn ash and samples were collected periodically. • TP-10 was excavated to a maximum depth of approximately 14.5-feet bgs on the western central portion of AOC-1, parallel to the southern boundary of the Property. One (1) sample was collected at 15-feet bgs, and subsequently archived. Visual indications of burn ash were not noted in TP-10. • TP-12 was excavated to a maximum depth of approximately 14.5-feet bgs on the eastern central portion of AOC-1, parallel to the southern boundary of the Property. One (1) sample was collected at 14-feet bgs, and archived. Visual indications of burn ash were not noted inTP- 12. • TP-16 was excavated to a maximum depth of 8-feet bgs on the northeastern portion of AOC-1. No samples were collected from TP- 16 and no visual indications of burn ash were noted. AOC-2 Based on the analytical results of samples collected from borings GP-4, GP-8 during the July 2003 sampling episode, seven (7) direct-push borings (GP-23, -24, -25, -27, -28, -29, -30 and 35) were advanced on the western and southeastern portion of AOC-2. During the completion of Borings GP-23, -24, -25, -29 and -30, soil samples were collected at 2-feet, 5-feet, 10-feet, and 15-feet bgs. Due to refusal encountered at approximately 11-feet bgs Borings GP-27 and GP-28 were completed to a depth of 10-feet bgs. The analysis of the samples from these borings is summarized below. • GP-23: The 10-foot sample was analyzed for TPHcc and PCBs. The 2- foot and 5-foot samples were archived. • GP-24 and GP-25: The 10-foot and 15-foot samples were analyzed for TPHcc and PCBs. The 2-foot and 5-foot samples were archived. • GP-27: The 5-foot and 10-foot samples were analyzed for TPHcc and PCBs. The 2-foot sample was archived. • GP-28: The 2-foot and 1 o.:.foot samples were analyzed for TPHcc and PCBs. The 5-foot sample was archived. @ Converse Project No ; 02-41-346-02 10 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 • GP-29: The 5-foot and 15-foot samples were analyzed for TPHcc and PCBs. The 2-foot and 10-foot samples were archived. • GP-30: The 2-foot, 10-foot, and 15-foot samples were analyzed for TPHcc and PCBs. The 5-foot sample was archived. • GP-35: The 5-foot, 10-foot, and 15-foot samples were analyzed for TPHcc. The 2-foot sample was archived. Two (2) exploratory trenches (TP-9, and TP-15) were excavated and the subsurface soil was observed for visual indications of burn ash. • TP-9 was excavated to a maximum depth of approximately 14.5-feet bgs on the southwest portion of AOC-2, parallel to the eastern Property boundary line. Visual indicators of burn ash were observed in TP-9. No soil samples were collected from this trench. • TP-15 was excavated to a maximum depth of approximately 15-feet bgs, on the northwestern portion of AOC-2, parallel to the northern Property boundary line. A soil sample was collected at 15-feet bgs, and subsequently archived. Groundwater was encountered at 15-feet bgs. No visual indicators of burn ash were observed in TP-15 . AOC-3 Based on the analytical results of soil sample GP-14 collected during the July , 2003 sampling episode, four (4) surface grab samples (GS-5 ,-6, -7, -8) were collected from AOC-3 in the vicinity of the portable toilet storage area, and from the southeastern corner of the area. These samples were analyzed for total and fecal coliform. One (1) exploratory trench (TP-7) was excavated and no visual indications of burn ash were observed in the excavation. AOC-4 Based on the analytical results of soil samples collected from GP-16 during the July 2003 sampling episode, two (2) direct-push borings (GP-32 and GP- 33) were advanced on the southeastern corner of the AOC-4, in the immediate vicinity of the railroad ties, to a maximum depth of 5-feet bgs. Soil samples were collected at 0.5-feet, 2-feet, and 5-feet bgs in these borings. The samples collected at 0.5-feet bgs were analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and PAHs. The 2-foot and 5-foot samples were archived. @ Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 11 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 • One (1) exploratory trench (TP-13) was excavated in the northeastern corner of the property. During excavation of the trench, no visual indicators of burn ash were observed. See Appendix A for the boring and trench logs. @ Converse Project No : 02-41 -346~02 12 4.0 Analytical Results Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 Selected soil and samples were analyzed in accordance with one or more of the following Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods: • EPA 8015, TPHcc, TPH-g; • EPA 8015 modified for Ethylene Glycol; • EPA 8260B, voes; • EPA 8270, SVOCs; • EPA 8081, Organochlorine Pesticides; • EPA 8082, PCBs; • EPA 8141, Organophosphorus Pesticides; • EPA 8151, Chlorinated Herbicides; • EPA 8310, PAHs; • pH; • Title 22 Metals; • EPA 9221, Total and Fecal Coliform; and • EPA 300 and 4500CIO2, Disinfectants (Bromate, Chlorite, Chlorine Dioxide, Free Chlorine, Total Chlorine). The samples collected during the July 2003 sampling event were analyzed on a normal, 5-day turnaround time by Associated Laboratories (State-certified laboratory), located in Orange, California and the samples collected during the September 2003 sampling event were analyzed on a rush 2-day turnaround time by Associated Laboratories. 4.1 July 2003 Sample Analytical Results The sample analytical results are summarized in the attached Tables 1 through 13 and the complete laboratory analytical report is presented in Appendix B. 4.1.1 AOC-1 4.1.1.1 TPHcc The analytical results indicated that the concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the C6-C10 and C1 0-C22 ranges and TPHg were not above the detection limit used for reporting purposes in any of the AOC-1 soil samples analyzed during the July sampling episode. Detected concentrations of TPH C22-C36 in the shallow surface soil (less than 2' bgs) ranged from 6.7 mg/kg in sample GP-12@ 2' bgs to a maximum of 9,370 mg/kg in sample HA-6@ 0.5' bgs and from less @ Converse Project No. 02-41-346°02 13 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3 , 2006 than the method detection limit in sample GP-11 @ 5' to a maximum concentration of 269 mg/kg in sample GP-18@ 5'. The analytical results of TPH concentrations detected in samples from this area are summarized in Table 1. 4.1 .1.2 Cam 17 Metals, The analytical results indicated that various metals were detected in soil samples GS-1, -2, -3, -4, GP-12, -13, -17, -18, and HA-7. The concentrations of metals in these samples were less than 10 times the STLC, and less than the TTLC, with the exception of one sample. • The arsenic concentration (57.9) in sample GP-13 @ 5' was greater than 10 times the STLC but below the TTLC. This sample was then analyzed using the waste extraction test (WET) method. The results of this analysis indicated a concentration of 2.64 mg/L, which is below the STLC of 5 mg/L for arsenic. The analytical results of metal concentrations detected in samples from this area are summarized in Tables 2 and the STLC analytical results are presented in Table 3. 4.1.1.3 pH The pH was reported to be 8.08 in GP-18 at 2-feet bgs, 9.32 in HA-7 at 0.5-feet bgs, and 7.7 in HA-7 at 2-feet bgs. The analytical results of the pH of soil samples are summarized in Table 2. 4.1 .1.4 Organochlorine Pesticides, Organophosphorous Pesticides, and Chlorinated Herbicides The analytical results indicated that organochlorine pesticides were detected in GS-1, -2, -3, -4; GP-9, -10 and -11. The maximum soil concentrations of these pesticides are summarized below. • 0.008 mg/Kg of 4,4-OOD in the surface grab sample GS-2. • 0.094 mg/Kg of 4,4-DDE in sample GP-9 @ 0.5'. • 0.085 mg/Kg of 4,4-DDT in sample GP-9@ 0.5' • 0.12 mg/Kg of aldrin in sample GP-9@ 0.5' • 0.12 mg/Kg of chlordane in sample GP-9@ 2' @ Converse Project No: 02 -41-346-02 14 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 Organophosphorous pesticides and chlorinated herbicides were not detected above method detection limits in GP-9, -10, -11, GS-1, -2, -3, and -4. The analytical results of the organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorous pesticides, and chlorinated herbicides for the soil samples in this area are summarized in Table 5. 4. 1. 1. s voes, svocs, and PCBs VOCs, SVOCs, and PCBs, were not detected in any of the samples analyzed in AOC-1. 4.1.2 AOC-2 4.1.2.1 TPHcc and Ethylene Glycol The analytical results indicated that concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the C6-C10 range were not detected above method detection limits in any of the samples (SS-1, WA-1, GP-4, -5, -6, -7, -8 analyzed from AOC-2 during the July sampling episode. A maximum concentration (2,200 mg/Kg) of TPH in the C10 -C22 range was identified in sample GP-6 @2' and a maximum TPH concentration of 10,400 mg/Kg in the C22 -C36 range was identified in sample GP-8 @10'. The analytical results indicated that ethylene glycol was not detected in the analyzed samples from borings GP-6 and GP-7. The analytical results of TPH concentrations detected in the soil samples from this area are summarized in Tables 1 and the water sample results are shown on Table 10 . 4.1.2.2 Cam 17 Metals The analytical results indicated that concentrations of various metals were detected in SS-1, WA-1, GP-4, -5, -6, -7, -8. These concentrations in the soil samples are less than 10 times the STLC, and less than the TTLC, with the exception of lead in sample GP-4 @ 5' feet bgs. The analytical results indicated a lead concentration of 52.9 mg/kg in this sample. This lead concentration is less than the TTLC of 1,000 mg/Kg and greater than 10 times the STLC of 5 mg/L. Therefore, the sample was analyzed using the WET method. The results of this analysis indicated a lead concentration 9f 0.771 mg/L, which is below the STLC of 5 mg/L for lead. @ Converse Project No. 02-41~346~02 ·' 15 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 Concentrations of barium (0.13 mg/I), copper (0.006 mg/I), molybdenum (0.24mg/l) and zinc (0.015 mg/I) were identified in water sample WA-1. The analytical results of metal concentrations detected in soil samples from this area are summarized in Tables 2 and the STLC analytical results are presented in Table 3. The water sample analytical results are presented in Table 11. 4.1.2.3 pH The pH was reported to be 9.69 in GP-4 at 2-feet bgs, 8.30 in GP-4 at 5-feet bgs, and 8.21 in GP-4 at 10-feet bgs. The analytical results of the pH of soil samples in this area are summarized in Table 2. 4.1.2.4 SVOCs and VOCs The analytical results indicated that no VOCs or SVOCs were detected above the method detection limits in AOC-2 except for sample GP-8 @5'. A Tetrachloroethene concentration of 0.0032 was detected in GP-8, at a depth of 5-feet bgs. The SVOC and VOC analytical results for boring GP-8 are presented in Table 6. 4.1.3 AOC-3 4. 1.3. 1 Cam 17 Metals Analytical results indicated that various metals were detected in backhoe trench sample TP-6 @ 8'. The analytical results of these samples indicated that the metal concentrations are less than 10 times the STLCs, and less than the TTLCs. 4.1.3.2 pH The pH in TP-6 at 8-feet bgs was reported to be 9.26. 4.1.3.3 Total Coliform, Fecal Coliform, and Disinfectants The analytical results indicated concentrations of that total and fecal coliform in samples from boring GP-14 and in water surface grab sample WA-3 as indicated below. @ Converse Project No. 02-41~346-02· ' 16 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 • Sample GP-14 at 0.5-feet bgs: Total coliform concentration of 11,000 MPN/g and a fecal coliform concentration of 460 MPN/g. • GP-14, at 2-feet bgs: Total coliform concentration of 350 MPN/g and fecal coliform at a concentration of 240 MPN/g. • WA-3, surface grab water sample: Total coliform exceeding 160,000 MPN/L and fecal coliform at a concentration of 160,000 MPN/L. Disinfectants were not detected in any of the analyzed samples analyzed from AOC-3. 4.1.4 AOC-4 4. 1.4. 1 TPHcc One soil sample (SS-2) and one surface river water sample (WA-2) collected from this area were analyzed for TPH carbon chains. No concentrations of hydrocarbon carbon chains above the method detection limit were identified in sample WA-2. The analytical results of soil sample SS-2 indicated hydrocarbon chain concentrations of 2.2, 3.6, and 26 mg/kg in the C6-C10, C10-22, and C22-36 carbon chain ranges respectively. 4.1.4.2 Cam 17 Metals, pH The analytical results of soil samples collected in this area indicated that concentrations of various metals were less than 10 times the STLC, and less than the TTLC, with the exception of the following: • Arsenic concentrations of 397 and 70.3 mg/kg were detected in samples TP-5 @11-feet bgs and GP-1 @ 15-feet bgs respectively. These concentrations were greater than ten (10) times the STLC of 5 mg/L, and below the TTLC of 500 mg/kg. Therefore, these samples were analyzed using the WET method. The results of these analysis indicated arsenic concentrations of 1.35 and 1.68 mg/I in samples TP-5@ 11-feet' and GP-1 @ 15-feet respectively. Sample TP-5 @11-feet bgs was also analyzed for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). The TCLP analytical results indicated an arsenic concentration of 0.075 mg/L which is below the Title 26 threshold of 100 mg/L. • Concentrations of copper greater than 10 times the STLC, and below the TTLC were detected in sample TP-1 at 3-feet bgs @ Converse Project No. 02-41-346~02 17 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 (757 mg/kg), TP-2 at 4 (435 mg/kg), TP-3 at 5-feet (1,030 mg/kg), GP-1 at 5 and 15-feet bgs (394 mg/kg and 786 mg/kg respectively), GP-2 at 5-feet bgs (389 mg/kg), and GP-16 at 0.5-feet bgs (789 mg/kg). Therefore, these samples were analyzed using the WET method. The analytical results of these analysis indicated copper concentrations below the STLC. Sample TP-2 at 4-feet bgs was also analyzed for TCLP. The results indicated a concentration of 0.651 mg/L which is below the Title 26 TCLP regulatory threshold of 5 mg/L. • The analytical results also indicated a copper concentration in sample TP-5 at 11-feet bgs. This concentration (2,780 mg/kg) was greater than ten (10) times the STLC, and greater than the TTLC for copper. This sample was analyzed using the WET method and analyzed for TCLP. The results of these additional analyses indicated no concentrations above the method detection limit. • A concentration of lead (136 mg/kg) was detected in soil sample SS-2. This concentration is greater than ten (10) times the STLC and less than the TTLC for lead. • Lead concentrations greater than 10 times the STLC and less than the TTLC were detected in samples GP-1 at 15-feet bgs (173 mg/kg), GP-2 at 5-feet bgs (163 mg/kg), TP-2 at 4-feet bgs (320 mg/kg), TP-2 at 8.5-feet bgs (818 mg/kg), TP-5 at 11- feet bgs (822 mg/kg), GP-1 at 5-feet bgs (61.2 mg/kg), TP-1 at 3-feet bgs (132 mg/kg}, TP-3 at 5-feet bgs (113 mg/kg) and TP-5 at 6-feet bgs (58.9 mg/kg). These samples were analyzed using the WET method. The results of these analyses indicated concentrations of lead above the STLC for lead in samples TP-2 at 4 feet bgs (13.5 mg/L), TP-2 at 8.5- feet bgs (17.5 mg/I), TP-1 at 3-feet bgs (5.27mg/kg) and TP-3 at 5-feet bgs (8.16 mg/kg). These concentrations are above the STLC (5 mg/kg) for lead. Samples TP-2 at 4-feet and 8.5-feet bgs and TP-5 at 11-feet bgs were analyzed using the TCLP. The analytical results of TP-5 at 11 feet bgs reported a lead concentration to be below the Title 26 threshold level for lead. Lead concentrations in samples TP-2 at 4-feet (0.722 mg/L) and TP-2 at 8.5 feet (0.907 mg/L) were above the Title 26 threshold level for lead (0.2 mg/L). • A concentration (2.31 mg/kg) of mercury was detected in sample GP-2 at 5-feet bgs. This concentration is greater than ten (10) times the STLC, and less than the TTLC for mercury. @ Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 18 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 The sample was analyzed using the WET method. The results of this analysis indicated no mercury concentrations above the method detection limit. • Zinc concentrations greater than 10 times the STLC, and greater than the TTLC were identified in samples GP-1 at 15- feet bgs (3,000 mg/kg), and TP-5 at 11-feet bgs (7,310 mg/kg). These samples along with samples TP-2 at 4-feet bgs and TP-2 at 8.5-feet bgs were analyzed using the WET method. The results of these analyses indicated zinc concentrations less than the STLC (250 mg/L) for zinc. Detected concentrations of the following analytes in the following samples were less than ten (10) times their respective STLCs, and below their respective TTLCs. However, the samples were analyzed using the WET and/or TCLP methods. • TCLP analytical results indicated no concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, selenium and silver above the method detections limit in samples TP-2 at 4-feet and TP-2 at 8.5-feet. • TCLP analysis indicated barium concentrations of 0.208, 0.262, and 0.775 mg/Lin samples TP-2 at 4-feet, TP-2 at 8.5-feet; and TP-5 at 11-feet bgs, respectively. • A nickel WET analysis of samples TP-2 at 4-feet bgs (0.331 mg/L), TP-2 at 8-feet bgs (0.437 mg/L) and TP-5 at 11-feet bgs (0.697 mg/L) reported concentrations less than the STLC (20 mg/L) for nickel. 4.1.4.3 pH The pH of the soil samples collected from AOC-4 was reported to be between 7 .57 and 10.90. 4. 1.4.4 voes The analytical results indicated concentrations of VOCs, were detected in two samples from AOC-4. • A toluene concentration of 5 ug/kg was reported in Sample GP-16 at 2 feet. Sample GP-16 at 0.5-feet bgs reported ethyl benzene, toluene, and total xylenes, with concentrations of 8,990 mg/kg; 255,000 mg/kg; and 42, 900 mg/kg, respectively. 4.1.4.5 SVOCs @ Converse ProjectNo. 02-41:345~02 19 I I I I Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 The analytical results also indicated concentrations of SVOCs in sample GP-6 at 0.5-feet bgs. • The analytes benzo(a) anthracene, benzo(b)pyrene, benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(g ,h, i)perylene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene, phenanthrene, and pyrene, with concentrations of 1,530; 2,020; 1,81 0; 1,530; 988; 1,760; 591; 2,450; 1,300; 640; and 2,400 mg/kg, respectively were reported in the sample. 4.1.4.6 PAHs Analytical results ·indicated concentrations of PAHs in sample GP-16 at 0.5-feet bgs. • Anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(b)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, fluoranthene indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene, phenanthrene, and pyrene, with concentrations of 0.034; 1.20; 0.995; 1.59; 2.11; 0.78; 1.96; 0.131; 3.39; 1.11; 0.901 and pyrene mg/kg, respectively were reported in this ,sample. 4.2 September 2003 Sample Analytical Results 4.2.1 AOC-1 4.2.1.1 TPHcc The analytical results reported no concentrations of hydrocarbons in the C6-C 10 and C 1 0-C22 carbon chain ranges above the method detection limit in soil samples GP-26, -31, -31a and -34. The analytical results reported concentrations of hydrocarbons in the C22-36 carbon chain range from below the method detection limit (sample GP-26 at 5-feet bgs) to a maximum 2,820 mg/kg in sample GP-31 at 5-feet bgs. 4.2.2 AOC-2 4.2.2.1 TPHcc @ Converse Project No. 02-41-346~02 20 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 The analytical results reported no concentrations of hydrocarbons in the C6-C 10 and C 1 0-C22 carbon chain ranges above the method detection limit in soil samples from borings GP-23, -24 @10-feet bgs, - 25, -27, -28, -29, -30, and -35. TPH concentrations in the C6-C10 and C10-C22 carbon chain ranges of 34 mg/kg and 9.4 mg/kg respectively were reported in sample GP-24 at 15-feet bgs . • The analytical results indicated that concentrations of C22-C36 carbon chains ranged from less than the method detection limit (samples GP-25 @ 1 0 and 15 feet bgs and GP-35 at 15-feet bgs) to a maximum concentration of 4,300 mg/kg in sample GP- 29 at 15-feet bgs. 4.2.2.1 PCBs The analytical results indicated a PCB concentration above the detection limit for reporting purposes in one sample. A PCB 1254 concentration of 0.035 mg/kg was reported in sample GP-24 at 10-feet bgs. 4.2.3 AOC-3 4.2.3.1 Fecal Coliform • Analytical results of surface grab samples GS-5 through GS-8 indicated that concentrations of fecal coliform from <1 MPN/g in samples GS-5 and GS-7 to a maximum of 350 MPN/g in sample GS-6 . 4.2.4 AOC-4 4.2.4.1 voes and svocs The analytical results indicated that no VOCs or SVOCs were detected above method detection limits in any of the samples analyzed (GP-32 and GP-33 at 0.5-feet bgs) from AOC-4 during the September 2003 sampling episode. @ Converse Project No . 02-41 -346-02 4.2.4.2 PAHs Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 The analytical results indicated concentrations of PAHs above the method detection limit in sample GP-32 at a depth of 0.5-feet bgs. The concentrations of benzo-(a)anthracene (0.219 mg/kg), benzo- (a)pyrene (0.290 mg/kg), benzo-(b)fluoranthene (0.357 mg/kg), benzo- (g,h,i)perylene (0.469 mg/kg), benzo-(k)fluoranthene (0.199 mg/kg), chrysene (0.458 mg/kg), floranthane (0.572 mg/kg), indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene (0.250 mg/kg), phenanthrene (0.100 mg/kg), and pyrene (0.346 mg/kg) were reported in this sample. @ Converse Project No: 02-41-346~02 22 5.0 Limitations and Exceptions Soil and Groundwater Sampling Report Davies Acquisition November 3, 2006 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Pardee Homes in accordance with the professional services agreement under which these services have been provided for as it applies to the Davies Property in the City of Chula Vista, San Diego County, California. Our services have been performed in general accordance with applicable state and local ordinances, and generally accepted practices in the geosciences. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made. Converse Consultants is not responsible or liable for any claims or damages associated with the accuracy and completeness of available information provided by others. Property exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions only at those points where samples are collected, when they are collected. Data derived through sampling and analytical testing are extrapolated by geoscientists who then render an opinion about overall subsurface conditions. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predictions. This report • should not be regarded as a guarantee that no further contamination, beyond that which was detected in our assessment, is present beneath the Property. In the event that changes to the Property occur, or additional, relevant information about the Property is brought to our attention, the recommendations contained in this report may not be valid unless these changes and additional relevant information are reviewed and the recommendations of this report are modified or verified in writing. Reliance on this report by Third Parties shall be at the Third Party's sole risk. E§) Converse Project No . 02-41-346-02 APPENDIX A B o ring and Tren c h Log s (on CD) APPENDIX B • L ab oratory An a lytical Re p o rts (on C D) FIGURE S 0 100 200 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET l r - I I I >-I • ~ w GS-4 w I a: 11. II) 0 co @ I g w [i ~L ---- OTAY RIVER t.,S (DRY WEST OF BRIDGE) * MONROY'$ TOWING r STORAGE 81 f-I TP-12 TP-10 AOC1 TRAILER ORT - 18 c:: I I I ID I JTP-9 I AOC2 ADJACENT NAKANO PROPERTY (AGRICULTURAL) \ * LORA'S TOWING PROPERTY OTAYRIVER \ - GS-7 PORTA POTTIES • \ \ WA-3 ... --i TP-6 DIRT/GRAVEL LOT ;--; TP-7 - AOC3 ·•· GS-8 CONCRETE MONU ENTS SS-2 WA-2 ♦ ? ? ? ;;-~)t~ f:)9"~ '--~' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BURN ASH ALL ADJACENT DENNERY RANCH PROPERTY NDEVELOPED AND RESIDENTIAL) LEGEND AOC AREA OF CONCERN GEOPROBE BORING • HAND AUGER BORING ♦ SOIL SURFACE GRAB SAMPLE TEST PIT GRAB WATER SAMPLE AND SEDIMENT SAMPLE (RIVER BOTTOM SOIL) AREA OF CONCERN BOUNDARY APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BURN ASH AREAS OF CONCERN ~ Converse Consultants DAVIES AQUISmON 4501 OTAYVALLEY ROAD CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Project No. 02-41-346-02 Figure No. 1 ♦ GS-1 OTAY RIVER ♦ GS-2 (DRY WEST OF BRIDGE) RIVER BANK ♦ GS-4 I • ~3P 12 * MONROY'S TOWING I TP-10 GP 10 I GP 11+ • I .. -• I AOC1 50 0 50 ~-Scale 1" = 50' ♦ GS-3 HE CEMENT PAD STORAGE BIN TP-12 GF TIRES ,1------,-_,I CAR PORT CEMENT • PAD TRAILER O I □ .--~ LEGEND * AREA NOT COMPLETELY CHARACTERIZED GEOPROBE BORING • HAND AUGER BORING ♦ SOIL SURFACE GRAB SAMPLE TEST PIT GRAB WATER SAMPLE AND SEDIMENT SAMPLE (RIVER BOTTOM SOIL) -• -PROPERTY BOUNDARIES --AREA OF CONCERN BOUNDARIES -• • -APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BURN ASH AREA OF CONCERN 1 DAVIES AQUISITION 4501 OTAY VALLEY ROAD CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA (i Converse Consultants Project No. 02-41-346-02 Figure No. 2 I I I I AD HE NTPAD I I 50 0 RIVER slNK \ \ 50 I I Scale 1 • = 50' PORTA POTTIES I lw (!) I~ C) I I I I I I I (_ I I SS-1 WA-1 ♦ T~ GI ~\ l GP 29 1 CONCRET MONUMEN S .. p.? UNIMPROVED ROAD * LORA'S TOWING 1f P -7 (:,p.35 GS-6 WA-3 T DIRT/G R 1 T I is•!!!!!!~~~~~~~~~~~~~•:_:~~~~~j~=:r-1 ~ --· * AREA NOT COMPLETELY CHARACTERIZED ... g GEOPROBE BORING \ I I AOC2 • HAND AUGER BORING \ ♦ SOIL SURFACE GRAB SAMPLE TEST PIT \ A GRAB WATER SAMPLE AND T SEDIMENT SAMPLE (RIVER BOTTOM SOIL) -• -PROPERTY BOUNDARIES --AREA OF CONCERN BOUNDARIES ADJACENT NAKANO PROPERTY -··-APPROXIMATELOCATIONOFBURNASH DAVIES AQUISITION 4501 OTAYVALLEY ROAD CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA AREA OF CONCERN 2 Project No. 02-41-346-02 €i Converse Consultants Figure No. 3 P-5 LORA'S TOWING GP-3!'-i 50 r •• • • ♦ GS-7 PORTA POTTIES \ 50\ GP-14 WA-3. f--------1 TP-6 DIRT/GRAVEL LOT TP-7 AOC3 ......__. ________ -. -. -. -. -. -. -.-. -. ~., \ Scale 1" = 50' ♦ GS-8 GS-5 GEOPROBE BORING • HANO AUGER BORING SOIL SURFACE GRAB SAMPLE TEST PIT A GRAB WATER SAMPLE ANO T SEDIMENT SAMPLE (RIVER BOTTOM SOIL) -• -PROPERTY BOUNDARIES --AREA OF CONCERN BOUNDARIES -• • -APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BURN ASH AREA OF CONCERN 3 DAVIES AQUISITION 4501 OTAY VALLEY ROAD CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA (i Converse Consultants Project No. 02-41-346-02 Figure No. 4 J_ TP 50 Scale 1 • = 50' OTAY RIVER OT GS-8 \ \ \ GS-5 DAVIES AQUISITION 4501 OTAY VALLEY ROAD CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA \ \ {!) Converse Consultants TP- ? APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BURN ASH FILL LEGEND @I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BURNASH GEOPROBE BORING • HAND AUGER BORING • SOIL SURFACE GRAB SAMPLE TEST PIT ♦ GRAB WATER SAMPLE AND SEDIMENT SAMPLE (RIVER BOTTOM SOIL) R"TY BOUNDARIES NCERN BOUNDARIES \ -• • -APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BURN ASH I\ r\r"JI AREA OF CONCERN 4 ProJecf No. 02-41-346-02 Figure No. 5 I I t TA B LES Table 1 Soil Sample TPH Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 EPA Method 8015 Boring Sample Number Depth (feet bgs) GP10 2 GP10 5 GP11 2 GP11 5 GP9 2 GS2 0 GP12 2 GP12 5 GP18 2 GP18 5 HA6 0.5 HA6 2 GP26 5 GP26 10 GP31 5 GP31A 10 GP34 5 GP34 10 GP5 2 GP5 5 GP6 2 GP6 5 GP7 2 GP7 5 GP8 2 GP8 5 GP8 10 GP23 10 GP24 10 GP24 15 GP25 10 GP25 15 GP27 5 GP27 10 GP28 2 GP28 10 GP29 5 mg/Kg -Miligrams per kilogram NA -Not analyzed Area of Date Concern Sampled AOC1 7/24/2003 AOC1 7/24/2003 AOC1 7/24/2003 AOC1 7/24/2003 AOC1 7/24/2003 AOC1 7/24/2003 AOC1 7/25/2003 AOC1 7/25/2003 AOC1 7/25/2003 AOC1 7/25/2006 AOC1 7/25/2003 AOC1 7/25/2003 AOC1 9/2/2003 AOC1 9/2/2003 AOC1 9/3/2003 AOC1 9/3/2003 AOC1 9/3/2003 AOC1 9/3/2003 AOC2 7/24/2003 AOC2 7/24/2003 AOC2 7/24/2003 AOC2 7/24/2003 AOC2 7/24/2003 AOC2 7/24/2003 AOC2 7/24/2003 AOC2 7/24/2003 AOC2 7/24/2003 AOC2 9/2/2003 AOC2 9/2/2003 AOC2 9/2/2003 AOC2 9/2/2003 AOC2 9/2/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface J -An estimate concentration below the method detection limit TPH -Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons TPH cc (mg/Kg) TPHg (mg/Kg) C06-C10 C10-C22 C22-C36 ND ND 115 ND ND 2.5J 4.7J ND ND ND 18 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 300 ND ND ND 170 NA ND ND 6.7 ND ND ND 105 ND ND ND 1210 ND ND ND 269 ND ND 235J 9370 NA ND ND 48 NA ND ND ND NA ND ND 130 NA ND ND 2820 NA ND ND 200 NA ND ND 24 NA ND ND · 490 NA ND ND 650 NA ND ND 1800 NA ND 2200 ND NA ND ND 830J NA ND ND ND NA ND ND 380 NA ND ND 90 ND ND ND 6.0 ND ND 540 10400 5.6 ND ND 2320 NA ND ND 1010 NA 34 9.4 81 NA ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NA ND ND 350 NA ND ND 805 NA ND ND 16 NA ND ND 200 NA ND ND 160 NA Ethylene Glycol (mg/Kg) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 of 2 Table 1 Soil Sample TPH Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 EPA Method 8015 Boring Sample Number Depth (feet bgs) GP29 15 GP30 2 GP30 10 GP30 15 GP35 5 GP35 10 GP35 15 SS-1 0 SS-2 0 mg/Kg -Miligrams per kilogram NA -Not analyzed Area of Date Concern Sampled AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 9/3/2003 AOC2 7/25/2006 AOC4 7/25/2003 ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface J -An estimate concentration below the method detection limit TPH -Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons TPHcc (mg/Kg) TPHg (mg/Kg) C06-C10 C10-C22 C22-C36 ND ND 4300 NA ND ND 420 NA ND ND 202 NA ND ND 373 NA ND ND 230 NA NO ND 770 NA ND ND ND NA ND ND 185 NA 2.2J 3.6 26 NA Ethylene Glycol (mg/Kg) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 of 2 Sample Boring Area of Depth Number Concern (feet bgs) GP12 2 AOC1 GP12 5 AOC1 GP13 2 AOC1 GP13 5 AOC1 GP17 0.5 AOC1 GP18 2 AOC1 GP18 5 AOC1 GS1 0 AOC1 GS2 0 AOC1 GS3 0 AOC1 GS4 0 AOC1 HA7 0.5 AOC1 HA7 2 AOC1 GP4 2 AOC2 GP4 5 AOC2 GP4 10 AOC2 GP5 2 AOC2 GP5 5 AOC2 GP6 2 AOC2 GP6 5 AOC2 GP7 2 AOC2 GP7 5 AOC2 GP8 2 AOC2 GP8 5 AOC2 GP8 10 AOC2 SS-1 0 AOC2 TP-6 8 AOC3 mg/Kg -Miligrams per kilogram NA-Not analyzed Date Sampled 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2006 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/25/2003 7/24/2003 ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface >, C: 0 E :;::; C: <( 2.65 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.46 24.5 1.93 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND J -An estimate concentration below the method detection limit E E u E ·c ~ ::, ::, .E Q) ~ II) ·c: ro "C L.. Q) ro <( al al (.) ND 61.3 0.418 ND 1.05 51.6 0.373 ND ND 71.7 0.397 0.078 57.9 110 0.616 ND 2.57 99.5 0.557 0.251 2.01 81.0 0.277 ND 2.13 118 0.513 ND 1.06 54.9 0.280 ND 3.05 65.7 0.301 ND 3.46 77.3 0.625 0.118 3.46 54.4 0.365 ND 1.97 74.9 0.414 0.103 4.15 105 0.566 0.061 8.88 98.2 0.471 0.189 15.8 94.1 0.424 0.23 1.91 29.5 0.391 ND 4.17 213 0.431 0.154 2.26 59.5 0.329 0.191 0.969 202 0.363 0.069 3.33 138 0.438 0.204 ND 0.631 ND 12.4 1.88 89.2 0.391 0.129 1.16 82.4 0.582 0.605 ND 51.4 0.399 0.168 1.59 27.8 0.226 ND 1.65 75.5 0.338 ND 6.50 104 0.572 ND Table 2 Soil Sample Metals Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 CAM 17 Metals EPA Method 6010B (mg/Kg), Mercury EPA Method 7471A E E ~ ::, ::, -L.. C: co Q) "C Q) .E 0. ro ::, Q) ~ .c 0. u "C 0 0 Q) L.. .0 u 0 ....I Q) z ... (.) u >, .s:::. :: 0 (.) :: 13.5 6.01 7.35 4.58 ND 9.29 4.61 10.5 4.87 6.14 16.5 0.17 3.44 4.30 17.0 7.46 2.29 1.20 ND 0.761 5.00 13.7 10.5 7.49 3.30 ND ND 7.33 12.1 6.71 31.8 15.70 0.33 2.62 5.79 12.0 4.04 2.81 4.30 0.29 2.16 20.30 15.0 8.44 9.89 11.5 ND ND 9.01 6.88 3.38 5.11 5.45 ND 0.827 3.35 8.59 4.63 9.27 15.4 ND ND 4.85 15.8 9.09 13.8 14.7 ND ND 9.51 9.88 4.66 9.52 8.54 ND ND 5.73 12 5.50 10.5 11.1 0.48 0.952 8.24 23.3 8.36 37.5 14.3 0.15 0.392 19.4 22 8.58 79.3 30.4 ND 23.9 10.4 17.8 10.8 151 52.9 0.31 30.5 7.21 11.2 6.68 7.28 3.61 ND 2.91 3.82 17.0 4.81 40.0 33.8 ND 0.936 4.95 12.8 5.11 21.5 23.3 ND ND 6.58 14.5 4.39 8.12 18.6 ND ND 6.00 20.8 9.04 160 36.5 ND 2.38 9.39 6.18 6.18 4.32 1.62 ND ND 5.64 13.3 4.82 361 19.5 ND 1.12 6.34 25 6.99 13.7 21.7 ND ND 7.20 13.6 7.02 50.9 17.1 ND 6.69 6.62 14.8 3.81 61.9 8.82 0.21 9.13 2.10 15.8 4.30 68.2 11.4 ND ND 4.54 7.46 3.49 5.29 5.99 ND 12.6 4.55 EPA Method 9045 E E E ::, L.. ::, ·c Q) ~ '5 u 2 C: Q) co ro ci5 N Q) .s:::. C: ro pH Cl) I-> ND ND ND 43.3 31.1 NA ND ND ND 24.9 29.4 NA ND ND ND 72.9 41.3 NA ND ND ND 46.4 32.0 NA ND ND ND 43.6 56.0 8.08 ND ND ND 52.7 25.2 NA ND ND ND 47.8 43.5 NA ND ND ND 24.6 50.8 NA ND ND ND 28.0 47.2 NA ND ND ND 40.7 66.4 NA ND ND ND 30.5 48.4 NA ND ND ND 32.0 48.3 9.32 ND ND ND 54.9 65.2 7.7 ND ND ND 38.5 177 9.69 ND ND ND 38.9 338 8.30 ND ND ND 30.3 19.7 8.21 ND ND ND 63.4 60.4 NA ND ND ND 33.6 74.0 NA ND ND ND 35.9 57.4 NA ND 0.118 ND 34.5 186 NA ND ND ND 39.5 39.9 NA 0.705 ND ND 33.7 83.7 NA ND 0.213 ND 35.3 83 NA 0.903 ND ND 42.5 71.8 NA ND ND ND 20.6 69.1 NA ND ND ND 33.3 205 NA ND ND ND 21.5 38.1 9.26 1 of 2 Sample Boring Area of Date Depth Number Concern Sampled (feet bgs) GP1 2 AOC4 7/24/2003 GP1 5 AOC4 7/24/2003 GP1 10 AOC4 7/24/2003 GP1 15 AOC4 7/24/2003 GP15 0.5 AOC4 7/25/2006 GP15 2 AOC4 7/25/2006 GP16 0.5 AOC4 7/25/2003 GP16 2 AOC4 7/25/2003 GP2 2 AOC4 7/24/2003 GP2 5 AOC4 7/24/2003 GP3 2 AOC4 7/24/2003 GP3 5 AOC4 7/24/2003 SS-2 0 AOC4 7/25/2003 TP-1 3 AOC4 7/24/2003 TP-1 11 AOC4 7/24/2003 TP-2 4 AOC4 7/24/2003 TP-2 8.5 AOC4 7/24/2003 TP-2 16 • Ine 7/24/2003 TP-3 2 AOC4 7/24/2003 TP-3 5 AOC4 7/24/2003 TP-4 2 AOC4 7/24/2003 TP-5 6 AOC4 7/24/2003 TP-5 11 AOC4 7/24/2003 Total Threshhold Limit Concentration (TTLC; mg/kg) Soluable Th reshold Limit Concentration (STLC; mg/L) mg/Kg -Mil igrams per kilogram NA -Not analyzed ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface >, C: 0 E ;;:::; C: <{ ND 4.02 ND 16.4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.73 5.27 ND 7.98 11.2 ND ND ND ND 2.65 138 500 15 J -An estimate concentration below the method detection limit E E 0 E ·2 ~ ::, ::, .E Q) ·c: ~ (/) co "O .... Q) co <{ co co (.) 1.63 227 0.650 ND 21.2 195 0.493 0.347 3.21 75.7 0.257 ND 70.3 333 0.600 1.44 ND 33.3 0.367 ND 9.97 140 0.218 0.286 6.45 219 0.698 0.182 ND 54.8 0.385 ND 3.90 94.9 0.590 0.097 6.69 171 0.453 1.42 2.99 80.9 0.389 0.139 7.01 97.0 0.352 0.115 3.02 76.4 0.379 2.79 24.9 290 0.682 2.95 1.81 94.5 0.672 ND 6.26 142 0.386 1.24 3.17 96.3 0.243 1.39 1.44 23 .6 0.185 ND ND 77.4 0.563 0.101 7.37 336 0.798 0.853 ND 45.9 0.417 0.096 15.4 87 .2 0.537 0.216 397 694 0.944 3.89 500 10,000 75 100 5 100 0.75 1 Table 2 Soil Sample Metals Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 CAM 17 Metals EPA Method 6010B (mg/Kg), Mercury EPA Method 7471A E E ~ ::, ::, -... C: ro Q) "C Q) .E ::, Q) Q. co (.) ~ .0 Q. Q) .... "O 0 0 0 0 ..J Q) .0 z .... (.) (.) >, .c ::E (.) 0 ~ 13.4 6.90 32.2 18.2 ND 6.29 6.29 22.0 18.9 394 61.2 ND 94.2 14.3 9.64 4.11 20.1 14 .5 ND ND 3.40 48.0 48.9 786 173 ND 394 11.4 14.0 5.21 2.66 ND ND ND 4.35 31.8 9.26 223 19.50 ND 24 · 21.90 32.4 18.4 789 44.30 ND 5.77 14.10 18.8 6.67 8.69 ND ND 7.04 9.09 14.5 6.67 21.0 11 .2 ND 4.22 6.94 43.3 14.4 389 163 2.31 26.4 25.9 19.4 8.38 72.7 20.2 ND 11.2 10.2 17.7 8.87 90.2 25.9 ND 25.8 11.9 20.2 4.55 121 136 0.39 6.03 22.7 83.6 31.6 757 132 0.20 73.9 46.9 11.9 6.00 3.62 2.68 ND 1.55 4.80 31.5 12.6 435 320 0.62 5.14 15.1 29.6 5.99 194 818 0.39 7.66 10.4 2 1.33 0.943 1.93 ND 2.19 0.683 15.8 8.55 15.2 7.27 ND 0.591 6.57 52.1 24.2 1030 113 0.64 1.64 24.1 15.8 6.80 28.5 8.61 0.22 1.46 7.86 18.0 12.6 143 58.9 0.30 32.4 7.97 78.2 165 2780 822 0.55 782 33.0 2,500 8,000 2,500 1,000 20 3,500 2,000 560 80 25 5 0.2 350 20 EPA Method 9045 E E E ::, ... ::, Q) .:2 0 ·2 '6 ~ 'iii C: Q) en co N Q) .c C: co pH en I-> ND ND ND 46.8 133 7.57 2.96 0.319 ND 30 1010 8.91 ND ND ND 28.9 31.4 8.85 5.7 1.29 ND 38.6 3000 8.82 ND ND ND 49.7 29.8 NA ND ND ND 124 280.0 NA ND 0.312 ND 28.7 533.0 NA ND 0.719 ND 37.5 24.5 NA ND ND ND 42.5 87.9 7.89 0.953 7.22 ND 36.5 630 10.90 ND ND ND 34.9 204 9.58 ND 0.272 ND 23.7 320 8.88 ND 1.21 ND 23.8 361 NA 5.75 0.811 ND 54.1 1110 8.41 ND ND ND 47.3 30.3 8.58 ND 3.16 ND 30.1 559 8.87 0.727 2.11 ND 18.4 553 7.98 ND ND ND 12.3 9.93 9.03 ND ND ND 56.2 44.5 8.15 0.865 1.06 ND 77.5 1350 8.17 ND ND ND 56.8 66.3 8.37 ND ND ND 34.8 373 9.35 12.7 4.88 ND 68.9 7310 8.99 100 500 700 2,400 5,000 -- 1 5 7 24 250 -- 2 of2 Sample Boring Area of Depth Number Concem (feet bgs) GP-13 5 AOC1 GP-4 5 AOC2 GP1 5 AOC4 GP1 15 AOC4 GP2 5 AOC4 GP16 0.5 AOC4 SS-2 0 AOC4 TP-1 3 AOC4 TP-2 4 AOC4 TP-2 8.5 AOC4 TP-3 5 AOC4 TP-5 6 AOC4 TP-5 11 AOC4 STLC (mg/L) mg/L -Milligrams per Liter NA -Not analyzed Date Sampled 7/25/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface >, C: (,.) 'i: 0 E Q) ~ ~ <( <( NA 2.64 NA NA NA NA NA 1.68 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.35 15 5 J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit STLC -Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration Table 3 Soil Sample Metals STLC Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 Metals EPA Method 6010 STLC, Mercury Extract EPA Method 245.1 (mg/L) E E E E ... ~ :::, E E :::, .., C: :::, :::, tii Q) 'O ] :::, :::, ·e ·e a. :::, Q) 'i: ~ .c a. ct! ~ 'O ·.:::: e 0 Q) .c (,.) Q) ro 'O (.) 0 ...J Q) >, z ai CD Q) ct! ..c: (.) ::E CD (.) (.) 0 en ::E NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.77 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.13 2.32 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.81 0.562 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 8.64 3.99 ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 20 .8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.38 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.57 5.27 NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.101 0.330 NA 12.1 13.5 NA NA 0.331 NA NA NA ND 0.439 NA NA 17.5 NA NA 0.437 NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.94 8.16 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.802 NA NA NA NA NA NA ND 0.184 NA ND 1.36 NA NA 0.697 NA 100 0.75 1 560 80 25 5 0.2 350 20 1 E E ... :::, ~ :::, i5 (,.) C: tii ct! N ci5 C: ..c: ~ f- NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 39.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 28.8 NA NA NA 29.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 90.2 5 7 24 250 1 of 1 Sample Boring Area of Depth Number Concern (feet bgs) TP-2 4 AOC4 TP-2 8.5 AOC4 TP-5 11 AOC4 TCLP (mg/L) mg/L -Milligrams per Liter NA -Not analyzed Date Sampled 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface >, CJ C 0 ·c E Q) Cl) :;:::; ,._ C <.( <.( NA ND NA ND NA 0.075 5 100 J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit TCLP -Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Table 4 Soil Sample Metals TCLP Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 Metals EPA Method 6010 TCLP (mg/L) E E E E ,._ ~ ::::, E ::::, ::::, ::::, -Q) C Q) .E cii "O ::::, Q) ::::, .E .c a. co CJ "O ..:.:: ·c ~ 0 0 a. Q) ,._ .c CJ co "O ,._ (.) 0 ...I Q) >, z co Q) co .c (.) :a: co (.) (.) 0 ~ 0.208 NA ND ND NA 0.651 0.722 NA NA NA 0.262 NA ND ND NA ND 0.907 NA NA NA 0.775 NA ND ND NA ND 0.08 NA NA n NA 1 5 NA NA 5 0.2 NA NA 1 E E E ::::, ,._ ::::, Q) ::::, CJ ·c > 'o C Q) cii co N Q) u5 C .c ctJ Cl) I-> ND ND NA NA NA ND ND NA NA NA ND ND NA NA NA 5 NA NA NA NA 1 of 1 Table 5 Soil Sample Pesticide and Herbicide Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 Organophosphorus Organochlorine Pesticides EPA Test Method 8081 (mg/kg) Boring Sample Area of Date Depth (feet Number bgs) Concern Sampled GS4 0 AOC1 7/24/2003 GS3 0 AOC1 7/24/2003 GS2 0 AOC1 7/24/2003 GS1 0 AOC1 7/24/2003 GP9 0.5 AOC1 7/24/2003 GP9 2 AOC1 7/24/2003 GP11 0.5 AOC1 7/24/2003 GP11 2 AOC1 7/24/2003 GP10 2 AOC1 7/24/2003 GP10 5 AOC1 7/24/2003 mg/Kg -Milligrams per kilogram ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit Cl Cl Cl I ""'" -.i ND ND 0.008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Q) w I-C Cl Cl C co All other Cl Cl ·c -e I ..;. "C 0 analytes s:t" <( :2 -.i -.i t) 0.005 0.006 ND 0.026 ND 0.010 0.009 ND 0.059 ND 0.030 0.010 ND 0.091 ND 0.007 ND ND ND ND 0.094 0.085 0.12 ND ND 0.011 0.020 ND 0.12 ND 0.013 O.Q18 ND ND ND 0.005 ND ND ND ND 0.029 0.012 ND 0.091 ND 0.084 0.012 ND 1 ND Pesticides EPA Method 8141 (mg/kg) All Analytes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Chlorinated Herbicides EPA Method 8151 (mg/kg) All Analytes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 of 1 Sample Boring Area of Depth Number Concern (feet bgs) GP10 2 AOC1 GP10 5 AOC1 GP11 2 AOC1 GP11 5 AOC1 GP12 2 AOC1 GP12 5 AOC1 GP13 2 AOC1 GP13 5 AOC1 GP18 2 AOC1 GP18 5 AOC1 GP9 2 AOC1 HA6 0.5 AOC1 HA6 2 AOC1 GP8 2 AOC2 GP8 5 AOC2 GP8 10 AOC2 SS-1 0 AOC2 GP15 0.5 AOC4 GP15 2 AOC4 GP16 0.5 AOC4 GP16 2 AOC4 GP32 0.5 AOC4 GP33 0.5 AOC4 SS-2 0 AOC4 ug/Kg -Micrograms per kilogram NA -Not analyzed Date Sampled 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/24/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/25/2006 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 7/25/2006 ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface a, C: a, i e 0 :c 0 I!! al I- ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.2J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit II) C: Q) N C: Q) IO >, :6 w ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND 8,990 ND ND ND ND Table 6 Soil Sample VOCs, SVOCs, Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 voes EPA 8260 (µg/Kg) a, a, a, C: C: C: Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ 0 C: ..c: ~ Jg l!! ~ 'E II) I!! Q) C: g :6 >, a. All Other a. Q) C: ro 0 ~ ::, Q) ta ::, .c Analytes ~ C: ro 2 ~ Q) .c 0) >, 0 C: 2 0 X N Ql N C: IO C: C: Ql Ql Ql IO IO IO ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND NO NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND NA NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 255,000 42,900 ND 1,530 2,020 1,810 1,530 5.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND SVOCs EPA 8270 (µg/Kg) a, a, C: C: Q) Q) 0 ..c: ~ a, ~(l) II) 'E C: C: a, :6 a, N C: ~ l!! C: C: :6 • Q) a, Q) :6 C: All Other 0 Ul ,!!!_ C: ~ ... ~ ::, ~» C: ~ l!! 0 a. ~ ..c: C: ~ ta >, Analytes ..,. ..c: ¾ 0 Q) "O C: 11. 0 (.) ::, ~o Ql ..c: N C: iI 11. C: Ql Ql .c IO 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 988 1,760 591 2,450 1,300 640 2,440 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 of 1 Table 7 Soil Sample Coliform Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 9221 Coliform by Multiple Tube Boring Sample Depth Area of Sample Date Number (feet bgs) Concern GP14 0.5 GP14 2 GS5 0 GS6 0 GS? 0 GS8 0 mg/Kg -Milligrams per kilogram NA -Not analyzed AOC3 AOC3 AOC3 AOC3 AOC3 AOC3 ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit MPN/g -Most probable number per gram Fermentation Total Coliform Fecal Coliform (MPN/g) (MPN/g) 11,000 460 350 240 NA <1 NA 350 NA <2 NA <2 Cationic Surfactants (mg/kg) ND ND NA NA NA NA 1 of 1 Table 8 Soil Sample PCB Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 Boring Sample Depth Area of PCBs EPA Method 8082 (mg/Kg) Number (feet bgs) Concern GP10 2 AOC1 GP10 5 AOC1 GP11 2 AOC1 GP11 5 AOC1 GP12 2 AOC1 GP12 5 AOC1 GP18 2 AOC1 GP18 5 AOC1 GP9 2 AOC1 GP23 10 AOC2 GP24 10 AOC2 GP24 15 AOC2 GP25 10 AOC2 GP25 15 AOC2 GP27 5 AOC2 GP27 10 AOC2 GP28 2 AOC2 GP28 10 AOC2 GP29 5 AOC2 GP29 15 AOC2 GP30 2 AOC2 GP30 10 AOC2 GP30 15 AOC2 GP8 2 AOC2 GP8 5 AOC2 GP8 10 AOC2 mg/Kg -Milligrams per kilogram ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface Sample Date 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2003 7/25/2006 7/24/2003 9/2/2003 9/2/2003 9/2/2003 9/2/2003 9/2/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 9/3/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 7/24/2003 J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit 1254 1260 All Other Analytes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.035 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.014J ND ND ND ND ND 0.023J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 of 1 Sample Boring Area of Date Depth Number Sampled Concern (feet bgs) GP16 0.5 AOC4 7/25/2003 GP32 0.5 AOC4 9/3/2003 GP33 0.5 AOC4 9/3/2003 mg/Kg -Milligrams per kilogram ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface (I) C Q) u e ..c c <x: 0.034J ND ND J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit Table 9 Soil Sample PAHs Analyticla Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 PAHs EPA 8310 (mg/Kg) Q) (I) Q) (I) Q) C C C C C Ql (I) (I) (I) Q) Ql u u C ..c ~ ..c e ~ --e C Q) C Q) £ ..c >, e 0. e C -0. 0 0 Ql C C rn ,....._ "' Jt :, :, (1) !E. ..c 5:.. ~ ..c rn 0 .0 0) .::,: ..c ti 0 N 0 0 -CJ -C 0 N N (I) N N N C C Ill C C C Ql (I) (I) Ql Ql .0 Ill Ill Ill (0 i:5 1.2 0.995 1.59 2.11 0.78 1.96 0 .131J 0.219 0.290 0.357 0.469 0.199 0.458 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Q) C ~ >, (I) 0. (I) C C ~ (I) (I) ... (I) ..c c5 -..c C All other I -~ C C'? C e C'i (1) >, Analytes 0 . C a. :, .... Q) u::: 0 ..c a. C (I) "'O .E 3.39 1.11 0.901 1.83 ND 0.572 0 .250 0.100 0.346 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 of 1 Table 10 Water Sample TPH Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 EPA Method 8015 Boring Sample Number Depth {feet bgs) WA-1 0 WA-2 0 mg/L -Milligrams per liter NA -Not analyzed Area of Date Concern Sampled AOC2 7/25/2006 AOC4 7/25/2003 ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit TPH cc (mg/L) TPHg (mg/L) C06-C10 C10-C22 C22-C36 ND 1.1J 0.7J NA ND ND ND NA Ethylene Glycol (mg/L) NA NA 1 of 1 Sample Boring Depth Number (feet bgs) WA-1 0 WA-2 0 mg/L -Milligrams per liter NA -Not analyzed Area of Date Concern Sampled AOC2 7/25/2003 AOC4 7/25/2003 ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface >, C 0 E :;::::; C: <( ND ND J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit u ·c: Q) 1/) .... <( ND ND Table 11 Water Sample Metals Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 CAM 17 Metals EPA Method 6010 (mg/L) E E E E .... ~ ::, E ::::I ::, -Q) C: Q) ::, .E ci'i "'C ::, Q) ::, .E a. ctl .le: ·;:: ~ ..c a. Q) ~ "'C u ca "'C 0 0 0 ..J Q) ..c z .... () >, al Q) ca .c () ~ al () () 0 ~ 0.130 ND ND ND ND 0.006 ND ND 0.24 ND 0.179 ND ND ND ND 0.004 ND ND 0.08 ND EPA Method E 9045 E E .... ::::I ::, Q) .2 u ·c: 'a ~ ci'i ca C: Q) u; C: N a; ..c: ca pH rn I-> ND ND ND ND 0.015 NA ND ND ND ND 0.013 NA 1 of 1 Table 12 Water Sample SVOCs, voes, Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 Boring Sample Area of Date Number Depth Concern Sampled (feet bgs) WA-1 0 AOC2 7/25/2003 WA-2 0 AOC4 7/25/2003 ug/L -Milligrams per liter ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface voes EPA 8260 (µg/L) All Analytes ND ND J -An estimated concentration below the method detection limit SVOCs EPA 8270 (µg/L) All Analytes ND ND - 1 of 1 Table 13 Water Sample Coliform Analytical Results Converse Project No. 02-41-346-02 Boring Sample Depth Area of Sample Date Number (feet bgs) Concern WA-3 0 AOC3 mg/L -Milligrams per Liter ND -Not detected above the method detection limit bgs -Below ground surface 7/25/2006 J -An estimated concentration below the method detection lim it MPN/L -Most probable number per Liter 9221 Coliform by Multiple Tube Fermentation Total Coliform Fecal Coliform (MPN/L) (MPN/L) >160000 160000 Cationic Surfactants (mg/L) ND 1 of 1