HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 2023-3557
ORDINANCE NO. 3557
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING
CHAPTER 2.73,
WAGETO TITLE 2 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO ESTABLISH A TRAFFIC CONTROL WORKER
MINIMUM WAGE
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista , a charter city, may adopt ordinances in
accordance with its police powers to ensure the public health, welfare, and safety of its residents; and
WHEREAS, construction and maintenance projects in the public rights-of-way may cause
unexpected hazards and difficult driving conditions, creating health and safety risks to the public,
including drivers, pedestrians, and workers; and
WHEREAS, traffic control workers perform a critical role in ensuring public safety during
-of-way; and
WHEREAS, traffic control workers are exposed to health and safety hazards and risks,
including the risks of serious injury and death; and
WHEREAS, traffic control workers who work on public works projects for the City must
be paid the prevailing wage required by the California Labor Code for public works projects;
however, private employers currently may pay traffic control workers on non-public works
-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Industrial Relations generally describes the
prevailing wage rate as the basic hourly rate paid on public works projects to a majority of workers
engaged in a particular craft, classification, or type of work within the locality and in the nearest
labor market area (if a majority of such workers are paid at a single rate). If there is no single rate
paid to the majority, then the single or modal rate being paid to the greatest number of workers is
prevailing; and
WHEREAS, studies have shown that the payment of applicable prevailing wage rate
improves safety and reduces the rate of injury and death among workers because workers who are
paid the prevailing wage generally are more qualified, based on factors such as skill, training, and
experience; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to limit health and safety risks to the public and traffic control
-of-way,
by requiring private employers to pay no less than the prevailing wage rate paid for the same type
of work on public works projects in San Diego County; and
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2023, the City Council directed City staff to draft and present a
traffic control worker minimum wage ordinance for consideration; and
Ordinance No.3557
Page No. 2
WHEREAS, a draft traffic control worker minimum wage ordinance was presented to the
City Council on September 12, 2023, and the City Council received public testimony, including
proposed amendments to the ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 2023, the City Council directed staff to incorporate certain
amendments proposed to the traffic control worker minimum wage ordinance and return with an
ordinance for action on September 19, 2023.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
Section I. Chapter 2.73 is added to the Chula Vista Municipal Code to read as follows:
Chapter 2.73
TRAFFIC CONTROL WORKER MINIMUM WAGE
2.73.010 Title
Traffic Control Worker Minimum Wage
2.73.020 Purpose and Intent
The purpose of this chapter is to address the unique safety risks confronted by workers and users
of City public rights-of-way by ensuring that, except in limited circumstances, all traffic control
workers are paid a wage at least equivalent to the prevailing wage they would receive if they were
working on a City public works project.
2.73.030 Definitions
When used in this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to
them below. Words and phrases not specifically defined below shall have the meanings ascribed
to them elsewhere in this Code, or shall otherwise be defined by common usage. For definitions
of nouns, the singular shall also include the plural; for definitions of verbs, all verb conjugations
shall be included.
of Chula Vista Municipal Code.
Section 2775 in the California Labor Code.
Ordinance No. 3557
Page No.3
indirectly, or through any other Person, including through the services of a temporary service,
staffing agency, or similar entity, employs or exercises control over the wages, hours, or working
conditions of any Employee.
a City issued permit that includes a traffic control plan.
means any individual, firm, partnership, joint venture, association, corporation, limited
liability company, estate, trust, business trust, receiver, syndicate, or any other group or
combination of Persons acting as a unit.
wage required by Labor Code Section 1720 et seq. to be paid to a
worker on a public works or maintenance project in the location where the work is performed.
streets, utilities, and other public works, including design-build contracts, construction manager
at-risk contracts, and job orders.
, or controlling
of traffic pursuant to a Permit.
erany Person engaged in Traffic Control Work, excluding public
agency Employees performing traffic control for a public agency.
2.73.040 Minimum Wage Required
All Traffic Control Workers performing Traffic Control Work, as required by a Permit, shall be
paid no less than the Prevailing Wage, except as follows:
A. Traffic Control Work performed by an Employee in support of the construction,
renovation, or repair of a single-family home, duplex, triplex, or accessory dwelling unit.
B. Traffic Control Work performed by an Employee on any project costing $1,000 or less, as
specified in California Labor Code Section 1771 or any subsequent cost threshold applicable to
the payment of Prevailing Wage established by California law.
C. Traffic Control Work performed by an Employee of a gas or electric utility company on
any project where the Employee performs Traffic Control Work for one hour or less per workday
or one hour or less per shift.
D. To the extent prohibited by law, or by a state or federal funding source requirement
applicable to the work that is the subject of the Permit.
Ordinance No.3557
Page No. 4
2.73.050 Retaliation
No Employer shall discharge, terminate a contract with, reduce compensation to, or otherwise
discriminate against or take adverse action against any Traffic Control Worker for opposing any
practice prohibited by this chapter, for participating in proceedings related to this chapter, for
seeking to enforce rights under this chapter by any lawful means, or for otherwise asserting rights
under this chapter. Protections in this section shall apply to any Traffic Control Worker who
mistakenly, but in good faith, alleges noncompliance with this chapter. Taking any adverse action
against a Traffic Control Worker within 90 days of the Traffi
protected under this chapter shall raise a rebuttable presumption of having done so in retaliation
for the exercise of such rights.
2.73.060 Enforcement
A. The City Manager may enforce this chapter in accordance with the provisions of CVMC
Chapter 1.41.
B. If an Employer ceases its business operations, or sells, exchanges, transfers, or otherwise
disposes of the business, then any Person that becomes a successor to the business
shall be liable for any unpaid amounts owed under this chapter, if, at the time of the conveyance
of the business, the successor has actual or constructive knowledge of the amounts owed as
determined by the City.
C. Civil Enforcement. A Traffic Control Worker, a representative of a Traffic Control Worker,
the City Attorney, or another Person acting on behalf of the public as provided for under applicable
state law may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against an Employer violating
this chapter.
1. Remedies for Violation. A Court of competent jurisdiction may impose all remedies
available under law or in equity, including injunctive or other equitable relief,
reinstatement, the payment of any wages unlawfully withheld, the payment of penalties
in the amount of up to $120 to each Traffic Control Worker for each day that a violation
fees shall be subject to the provisions
of 2.73.060(C)(2) below. In addition to the remedies identified above, a Traffic Control
Worker who is the subject of retaliation by an Employer, as described in Section
2.73.050, is entitled to reinstatement and treble damages.
2.
prevailing party only in individual actions or proceedings in which the City elects, at
the initiation of that individual action or proceeding, to seek recovery of its own
Ordinance No. 3557
Page No.5
2.73.070Limitations
A. Any waiver by a Traffic Control Worker of any or all of the provisions of this chapter or
of rights or protections afforded under the authority of this chapter shall be deemed contrary to
public policy and shall be void and unenforceable.
B. This chapter is not intended to, and shall not be interpreted to, conflict with federal or state
law and shall be interpreted to be compatible with federal and state enactments, not limited to those
dealing with employee/employer and labor relations, and in furtherance of the public purposes that
those enactments encompass.
C. This chapter does not create any cause of action for damages against the City.
D. This chapter shall not be construed as limiting right to obtain
relief to which the Traffic Control Worker may be entitled at law or in equity. Exhaustion of
remedies under this chapter is not a prerequisite to the assertion of any right.
E. This chapter shall not be construed to discourage or prohibit an Employer from providing
higher wages to its Employees.
2.73.080 Promulgation of regulations, standards, and other legal duties
A. The City Manager is authorized to establish, consistent with the terms of this chapter, any
additional administrative rules, regulations, and standards determined to be necessary to carry out
the purposes of this chapter.
B.
public in the Office of the City Clerk.
C. Regulations promulgated by the City Manager shall become effective and enforceable upon
date
2.73.090 Effective Date
Any Permit issued by the City on or after December 2, 2023, shall be deemed to include the
requirement to comply with this chapter.
Section II. Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any
reason held to be invalid, unenforceable, or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction,
that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability, or unconstitutionality
shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance or its
application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista
hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses, or
phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Ordinance No.3557
Page No. 6
Section III. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in
light of that intent.
Section IV. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage.
Section V. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
\[SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE\]
Ordinance No. 3557
Page No.7
Presented by Approved as to form by
Tiffany Allen Jill D.S. Maland
Assistant City Manager Lounsbery Ferguson Altona & Peak
Acting City Attorney
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
rd
California, this 3 day of October 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Cardenas, Chavez, Gonzalez, Preciado, and McCann
NAYS: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
John McCann, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Kerry K. Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 3557 had its first reading at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of September
2023, and its second reading and adoption at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
3rd day of October 2023 and was duly published in summary form in accordance with the
requirements of state law and the City Charter.
Dated Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk