Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 2019_06_18 Item 10June 18, 2019File ID: 19-0293 TITLE A.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE THIRD ADDENDUM (IS-17-0005) TO FEIR 02-04; APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO REFLECT LAND USE CHANGES FOR APPROXIMATELY 36 ACRES WITHIN THE OTAY RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL PLANNING AREA 12 PLANNED COMMUNITY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED TEXT, MAPS AND TABLES B.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENTTO THE OTAY RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, DESIGN PLAN, AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS; ANDAPPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH MASTER PRECISE PLAN C.ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO OTAY RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS FOR THE NORTHERLY FC-2 PORTION (FIRST READING) D.ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING ADEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, VILLAGE II TOWN CENTER, LLC AND SUNRANCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC FOR THE FREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH PORTION OF OTAY RANCH PLANNING AREA 12 (FIRST READING) E.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY ACREAGE FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND OTAY PROJECT, L.P F.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTAAPPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CVT 19-0001 FOR OTAY RANCH PLANNING AREA 12 FREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH G.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT DR17-0037 TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF A578 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX, 15,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL USE, TWO INTEGRATED PARKING STRUCTURES ON TWO LOTS CONSISTING OF 10.4 ACRES LOCATED INTHE OTAY RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD PA-12 Page|1 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 243 of 1481 RECOMMENDED ACTION Councilconduct the public hearing, adopt the resolutions and place the ordinances on first reading. SUMMARY Baldwin & Sons, LLC (“Applicant” or “Developer”) is proposing to amend the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP), Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and the associated Planned Community (PC) District Regulations in order to accommodate 300 additional multi-family residential units, maximizing land use potential within walking range of the Otay Ranch Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) stop andensuring transit-supportive densities near the BRT line. The Applicant submitted a Design Review (DR) application for a 4-and 5-story “Texas wrap” apartment project consisting of 578 units with a 5-level parking structure and 15,000 sq. ft. of ground floor commercial. The project also includes an amendment to the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial North Development Agreement (DA) and an amendment to the Agreement for the Provision of Community Purpose Facility (CPF) Acreage for Otay Ranch Village 2. An Environmental Impact report (EIR) Addendum has been prepared in order to provide additional information and analysis concerning land use impacts anticipated to result from the proposed amendments. On November 16, 2017, the Applicant filed applications to process all of the subject items. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project is covered in the previously adoptedFinal Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (FEIR 02-04) (SCH#1989010154). The Development Services Director has (SPA) Plan -Planning Area 12 determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has caused the preparation of a Third Addendum to FEIR 02-04. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On May 22, 2019 the Planning Commission took action and voted 6-1-0 that Council adopt the resolutions and ordinances. DISCUSSION In September 2004, the Freeway Commercial SPA Plan and Tentative Map were adopted, entitling approximately 1,214,000 square-feet of commercial uses, including867,000 square-feet on Freeway Commercial South (FC-1) and 347,000 square-feet on Freeway Commercial North (FC-2). In May of 2015, in conjunction with a first Addendum to FEIR 02-04, General Plan (GP) and General Development Plan (GDP) amendments (Resolution No. 2015-114) entitled the development of 600 multi-family residential units and mixed-usecommercial consisting of 15,000 square-feet of ground-floor commercial retail, and a 2-acre highly amenitized urban park, and assuredthe development of two hotels within the FC-2 portion of the SPA. A Development Agreement was adopted viaOrdinance No. 3345 on June 29, 2015. In September of 2016, a second Addendum to FEIR 02-04, amendments to the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Plan and associated regulatory documents (Resolution 2016-187); Tentative Map CVT 15- Page|2 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 244 of 1481 0007 (Resolution 2016-188); Design Review Permit DR16-0030 (Resolution 2016-189); and amendments to the Freeway Commercial SPA’s Planned Community District Regulations (Ordinance 2016-3376) entitled and implemented the development concept of the GP and GDP for a transit-oriented, mixed use project with two hotels. The 36-acre FC-2 site is currently approved for a Mixed-Use land use including 600 multi-family residential units; a 2-acre park; 15,000 sq. ft. of commercial; and two hotels. The walkable, transit-oriented, mixed-use neighborhood will be a mix of apartments, multi-family townhomes, two hotels, a park and 15,000 sq. ft. of ground-floor retail/commercial space. Previously approved multi-family condominium units are under construction west of Town Center Drive and the Marriott Residence Inn began operations inOctober of 2017. Park construction plans are in review for the 2-acre highly amenitized urban park. The drawings for the second hotel will be considered for approval in 2019. The Applicant is now requesting amendments to the Otay Ranch GDP, Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Plan and its associated documents, and the Development Agreement in order to add 300 additional residential units (for a total of 900 units) to accommodate a mixed-use project consisting of 578 apartments; 15,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses; and two integrated parking structures in lieu of a surface parking lot on two lots consisting of 10.4 acres (DR17-0037). Addendum to FEIR02-04 Section 21002 of the CEQA requires that an environmental impact report identify the significant effects of a project on the environment and provide measures or alternatives that can mitigate or avoid those significant effects. The Freeway Commercial SPA was analyzed in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan -Planning Area 12 (FEIR 02-04) (SCH #1989010154). The First Addendum to the FEIR was approved for the General Plan and Otay Ranch General Development Plan Amendments in May 2015. The Second Addendum to the FEIR was approved for the SPA Plan Amendmentin September2016. The First and Second Addendato the FEIR analyzed the impact of the General Plan, General Development Plan and SPA Plan amendments,based on the urban, mixed use development proposal. As a result of this analysis, the basic conclusions and impacts identified in FEIR 02-04 were determined to not have changed. The land use and public service impacts for the proposed project are found to be less than significant and were adequately covered in FEIR 02-04for the previous two Addenda. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared the ThirdAddendum to the FEIR. The Third Addendum provides an environmental analysis of the potential impacts associated with implementing the proposed Freeway Commercial SPA Plan and Master Precise Plan Amendment.As a result of this analysis, the basic conclusions and impacts identified in FEIR 02-04 were determined to not have changed. The land use and public service impacts are found to be less than significant for thisSPA Plan amendment, Design Review and Tentative Map proposed project and were adequately covered in FEIR 02-04. GDP, SPA Plan and DA Amendment(s) 1.Location, Existing Site Characteristics, and Ownership The Freeway Commercial SPA Plan area is generally located south of Olympic Parkway, north of Birch Page|3 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 245 of 1481 Road, east of State Route 125 and west of Eastlake Parkway (see Locator Map, Attachment 2). This amendment is limited to the FC-2 portion of the SPA Plan, located between Olympic Parkway and the existing Otay Ranch Town Center mall. The project is located within a 10-minute walk of the Otay Ranch BRT station, a major transit hub with an express connection to downtown San Diego, as well as next to bus stops serving 2 local routes connecting the project to Southwestern College and the H Street Transit Center, which is a Blue line trolley stop. Both BRT and localbuses will connect the project to the Millenia Office Campus with its 1.4 million sq. ft. of office space, immediately south of Birch Road. The future University and Innovation District development is a 20-minute bicycle ride and will also be connected via transit routes. The FC-2 mixed-use district is currently under construction, in various stages of completion. One of the two hotels, the Residence Inn by Marriott, has been open since October of 2017.The second hotel is in the design development phase and will be submitted for review in 2019. Two condominium neighborhoods west of Town Center Drive are in early phases of construction. The public park received City Council approval in September 2018 and is currently in the construction permitting phase. The eastern portionof the FC-2 site remains vacant and undeveloped.FC-2 is an infill development surrounded by existing roads, utility services, schools, hospitals, retail centers and entertainment. It is within a ten-minute walk of the Otay Ranch Town Center mall with its 23 restaurants, movie theater and library, within a 20-minute walk of the Marketplace at Windingwalk containing a Vons grocery store, 8 restaurants and 11 various commercial services. Within a 20-minute bike ride, FC-2 residents can reach Southwestern College, Eastlake Business Park, LA Fitness gym, Scripps Coastal Medical Center, and Mattress Firm Amphitheater. The eastern undeveloped portion of FC-2 is owned by Village II Town Center, LLC. Table 1 –Existing General Plan, GDP, SPA Plan Land Use Designations and Land Use General PlanOtayRanchCV Municipal PC District Land Existing GeneralCode ZoningUse DesignationLand Use Development Plan Site–Commercial Retail FreewayPlannedH–CommercialH –hotel Freewayin FC-1 and Retail Commercial in CommunityHotelRM –under CommercialCommercial/Mixed FC-1and(PC)RM -Multi-family construction Use Residential in FreewayResidentialforMulti- FC-2CommercialR/MU–Multi-Family and Mixed Use FamilyResidential; P, in FC-2Resid./Mixed UseR/MU, C/MU - C/MU-Mixed-Use vacant. FC-1 Comm/MFdeveloped as P -ParkOtayRanch Town Center mall. Eastlake NorthCommercial RetailN/A-thePlannedFreewayTerraces EastlakeIICommunityCommercial-FCshopping Page|4 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 246 of 1481 General PlanOtayRanchCV Municipal PC District Land Existing GeneralCode ZoningUse DesignationLand Use Development Plan Freeway(PC)center Commercial EasternUrbanEUC (Millenia)PlannedGatewayMixedMillenia SouthCenterCommunityUseCommercialCommons (PC)Districtandshopping Northeasterncenterand NeighborhoodMulti-Family DistrictResidential Village 11PlannedRM1Fully Low-Medium EastResidential, Mixed Medium-HighCommunitydeveloped Use ResidentialDensity(PC)residential Residential Village6PlannedRM1 and RM2Fully Medium WestResidential, Mixed Medium-HighCommunitydeveloped Useresidential, Density(PC)residential Low-MediumResidential, Residential,Low Medium Public/Quasi-Village Public, Parks & Density RecreationResidential 2.Project Description The proposed amendment adds300 units to the previously approved urban mixed-use multi-family neighborhood.These additional units will achieve the higher density and massing desired for an innovative smart growth design on the eastern portion of the project, consistent with the existing Mixed- Use Residential (MUR) land use designation provisions. No changes to the land use plan, hotels, 15,000 sq. ft. of commercial, or previously approved multi-family neighborhoods on the west side of FC-2 are proposed. All of the additional units will be allocated to R/MU, on the east side of the project. The project will consist of two separate lots with a private street bisecting the two parcels. Lot 1 proposes a 4 to 5- story building with 15,000 square-foot of retail along Town Center Drive and 237 apartment units, with the apartments surrounding a 5-story parking structure. Lot 2 proposes a 4-story building with 341 apartment units that surround a 5-story parking structure. This form of development eliminates the need for large areas of surface parking lots, allowing more space for parks and residential amenities. By not having a surface parking lot, the project’s open space area increases by 173%, from 45,300 sq. ft. in the previous design concept to 123,600 sq. ft. under the subject plan, not counting the interior building amenities. Conversely, the land area covered by parking was reduced by 53%, from 173,000 sq. ft. in the previous design with surface parking to 81,200 sq. ft. of garage footprint. The site plan for the mixed-use apartments now includes two large pools (one in each building), three private parks, a playground, a dog run, amenitized outdoor mingling areas with cabanas, fire pits, and hanging day beds, as well as approximately 10,000 sq. ft. of interior recreational space. Page|5 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 247 of 1481 The 578-unit apartment mix is comprised of 56 studios, 290 one-bedroom units, and 232 two-bedroom units. The floor plans range from approximately 600 sq. ft. to 1,200 sq. ft. with dual master bedrooms, which allow for roommate living. This type of rental housing is especially attractive to students, retail workers, and the future office campus employees, providing a range of housing choices in the Chula Vista housing market, which is heavily skewed toward single-family detached homes. The 15,000 sq. ft. of proposed commercial space will be located on the ground floor in Building A along Town Center Drive. This location provides commercial uses with optimal visibility from the street and sets it as a gateway to FC-2. The sidewalk along ground-floor commercial on Town Center Drive has been expanded from the standard 6-foot width to a 38-foot wide pedestrian zone, including a 13-foot wide sidewalk and a 12-foot wide plaza with seating areas and planters for an inviting pedestrian environment. The retailspaces provide large windows on the ground floor, variation in façade treatment, and seating for human-scale architecture. The project contains transit and pedestrian-friendly elements throughout the site. Tree-lined landscape parkways, setbacks to promote a comfortable pedestrian-oriented environment, and pedestrian-scale facade features on sidewalk-fronting buildings are proposed throughout the development. Several way- finding signs will be installed on Town Center Drive directing pedestrians to the BRT stations, library, and public park. The following is an Analysis of the project approvals that were submitted as part of this application: Analysis 1.Otay Ranch GDP Amendment The Otay Ranch GDP provides a vision and direction for the planning of the Freeway Commercial area, including the FC-2 subarea. The vision of the GDP for thisareais the provision of hotels and high density residential in a mixed-use urban character setting that includes ancillary commercial uses and an urban park. The proposed amendment is consistent with the current land use designations and density allowed by the GDP. A Mixed-Use district, which is the current approved land use district in FC-2, allows a density range between 28-45 dwelling units (DU) per acre. With the additional 300 units, the overall project density is 33.7 DU per acre. GDP amendments include updating project summary tables, population rates and number of units to reflect theadditional 300 units. The comprehensive list of all the proposed GDP policies is located in Appendix B of Attachment 12. 2.Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Plan Amendment With its mixed-use zoning, proximity to good transit service and existing commercial developments, and good walking and cycling conditions, the FC-2 site meets the criteria for high-density compact development. In accordance with General Plan Objective H3, “the provision of new housing opportunities Page|6 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 248 of 1481 within mixed-use areas and at higher density levels, particularly in transit focus areas and identified town centers, is encouraged. Mixed use and compact developments can result in easier access to goods and services, and increased employment and business opportunities, and the creation of vibrant community places.” The proposed density increase will allow FC-2 to fully maximize its land use potential within walking range of the Otay Ranch BRT stop and ensures transit-supportive densities near the BRT line. At 900 residential units, the project will be at the mid-range of the permitted density for a Mixed-Use district. The apartments will have the highest density and will be located along Town Center Drive and Olympic Pkwy. Lower density townhomes and condominiums are set back towards the west side of the project site, thus providing a variety of housing types. Parks, Open Space & Trails The FC-2 amendment triggers new fees for parks. With the additional 300 multi-family units, the project parkland demand totals 7.05 acres based on Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) Section 17.10. The project will meet its parkland obligation of 7.05 acres through two mechanisms. The obligation of the previously entitled 600 residential units will be met through the provision of a 2-acre public park enhanced through additional amenities to a value equivalent to 4.69 acres of parkland, to bemaintained through a Community Facilities District rather than the City General Fund, per the Freeway Commercial North Development Agreement. Due to the lack of available land within the project to site additional park acres, staff proposes to waive the Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD) Fee for units developed in excess of the original 600. The Applicant will instead pay an equivalent in-lieu Park Benefit Fee to address the impacts from the proposed new units. Based on current PAD fees, the Applicant will pay approximately $4,580,100 in Park Benefit Fees if all 300 additional units are constructed. The Park Benefit Fees will be used to provide or enhance parksthat serve the City’s eastern territories. In accordance with the Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan (RMP), parcel FC-2 has a preserve land conveyance obligation of 40.761 acres that will be conveyed upon approval of the first final map. In associationwith the original Final Map for this Project, Map 16291, 40.761 acres were conveyed to the Otay Ranch Preserve Owner Manager via recorded Open Space Easement Doc# 2018-0325995. Community Purpose Facilities CVMC Section 19.48 requires the provision of 1.39 acres of land per 1,000 persons be zoned for Community Purpose Facilities (CPF) when creating a SPA Plan. With the additional 300 multi-family units, the Project will require 3.24 acres of CPF. In accordance with the provisions of Section 5.3.2 of the amended Development Agreement for Freeway Commercial North, the Applicant may satisfy its CPF requirement in any manner consistent with CVMC Section 19.48.025, which may include the provision of the CPF land offsite, alternative compliance, or adjustments to the percentage limitations on the types of facilities, including recreational facilities, that may count toward satisfying the CPF requirement, all in the discretion of the Director of Development Services. Freeway Commercial PC District Regulations Amendments The PC District Regulations amendment is limited to the mixed-use apartments where the additional 300 multi-family units will be allocated. No changes are proposed to the Land Use matrix, or the previously approved regulations for hotels and condominium projects. Page|7 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 249 of 1481 The proposed revisions to the Development Standards are as follows: Table 2–Development Standards StandardCurrently ApprovedProposed Change Private Useable Studios, 1-bedroom, and units above first 60 sq. ft. per unit Open Spacestory: 60 sq. ft. Ground floor units: 80 sq. ft. for 2 bedroom units 100 sq. ft. for 3 bedroom units Parking1-bedroomunits: 1.5 spaces/unitAdd 1.0 space/unit for studios 2-bedroomunits: 2.0 spaces/unit4 spaces/1,000 sq. ft. for 3-bedroomunits: 2.25 spaces/unitcommercial mixed-use Guest parking ratio of 0.33 is included in above ratios. Freeway Commercial SPA Plan Design Guidelines Amendments The Freeway Commercial North Design Plan was updated to include the proposed new site plan for the apartments on the east half of FC-2. Specific design guidelines for residential and mixed use commercial/residential are provided in the Master Precise Plan. Public Facilities Finance Plan(PFFP) and Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) A PFFP has been prepared as a supplemental document to the original PFFP dated April 1, 2003. The Freeway Commercial North Supplemental PFFP for this project analyzes the proposed 300-unit addition, any potential impacts on public facilities and services, and identifies the facilities, phasing and timing triggers for the provision of facilities and services to serve the project, consistent with the City’s Quality of Life Threshold Standards. The PFFP describes in detail the cost, financing mechanism and timing for construction of necessary public facilities based on the project’s proposed phasing. The public facilities needed to serve the project will be guaranteed by placing conditions of approval on the Tentative Map, requiring payment of various fees at the buildingpermit stage, and/or continuing payments under the approved Community Facilities District to finance or maintain public facilities. The PFFP included an analysis of transportation, drainage, water, sewer, fire, schools, libraries, parks, and fiscal impacts of the project. The supplemental PFFP also includes a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) of the Freeway Commercial North plan and phasing program. The Freeway Commercial North Supplemental FIA has been prepared using the City’s current fiscal impact analysis model. It is important to note that the FIA presents a projection of the anticipated fiscal impacts of the development, based upon the best information currently available. Actual fiscal impacts as a result of the development may vary from model outcomes. Based on the FIA and the assumptions contained therein, both the currently approved project and the proposed amendment are projected to generate a positive net fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. The Page|8 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 250 of 1481 relative fiscal performance of the currently approved project and the proposed project over the next 10 years are compared in the table below. Table 3 –Comparison of Modeled Fiscal Impact Scenarios (Annual Net Impact, Millions) Year 1Year 2Year 4Year 6Year 8Year 10 Revenues$0.65$0.76$1.83$2.12$2.24$2.30 Approved ProjectExpenses($0.01)($0.13)($0.42)($0.67)($0.68)($0.69) Net Impact$0.65$0.63$1.41$1.46$1.56$1.62 Revenues$0.65$0.79$2.04$2.31$2.37$2.44 Expenses($0.01)($0.13)($0.72)($0.98)($0.99)($1.01) Proposed Project Net Impact$0.65$0.66$1.32$1.33$1.38$1.43 Overall, comparing the projected net annual fiscal impacts in year 10 for the currently approved project and the proposed project ($1.62 million and $1.43 million, respectively) indicates a $0.19 million reduced annual positive fiscal impactto the City. Affordable Housing Plan The Chula Vista General Plan Housing Element contains objectives, policies and action programs to accomplish key affordable housingobjectives. Key among these is the affordable housing policy which requires that residential development with fifty (50) or more dwelling units provide a minimum of 10% of the total dwelling units for low-and moderate-incomehouseholds; one-half of these units (5% of the total project) being designated for low-income, and the other half (5%) being designated for moderate-income households. Based on the entitlement of 900 residential units in FC-2, 45 low-income and 45 moderate-income affordable units are required. These affordable housing units may be located either within or outside the plan area. An Amended and Restated Housing Development Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Baldwin and Sons was executed on September 21, 2017, which allows the Developer to satisfy its affordable housing obligation throughcredits earned by the development of off-site housing at the Olympic Training Center. The Project may satisfy its affordable housing obligation through a combination of on-site and off-site units. Water Conservation Plan The City of Chula Vista’s Growth Management Ordinance requires that all development of 50 units or more prepare a Water Conservation Plan (WCP) as part of the SPA Plan. This plan presents a review of presently available technologies and practices that result in water conservation. This plan identifies water conservation measures that will be incorporated into the project as a condition of approval on the SPA Plan. A WCP, consistent with the current City standards,has been prepared as a part of the proposed project. This WCP covers additional land uses proposed by this amendment. The FC-2 WCP requires that residential development provide hot water pipe insulation, pressure reducing Page|9 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 251 of 1481 valves and water efficient dishwashers. Non-residential measures include hot water pipe insulation, pressure reducing valves and compliance with Division 5.3 of the California Green Building Standards Code. In addition, to comply with the City’s current water conservation requirements, the developer will also include dual flush toilets and water efficient landscaping. Together these measures annually save approximately 8,850 gallons per multi-family unit. The WCP also provides a discussion of the local water conservation requirements related to the use of reclaimed water. The City of Chula Vista Landscape Manual requires the use of recycled water for irrigation of parks, median landscaping, open space slopes, and common landscaped areas. The Landscape Manual also requires some drought tolerant plant selection in the landscaping plan and the use of evapotranspiration controllers for parks and common landscaped areas. Additionally, the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance is expected to reduce outdoor water consumption due to the setting of strict water budgets on City approved landscape plans that must not be exceeded. The use of recycled water and other water conservation measures is expected to reduce potable water usage by 53,385 gallons per day (gpd), or 24%. The proposed conservation measures outlined above, and identified in the FC-2 WCP, comply with the City of Chula Vista’s Growth Management Ordinance and the goals, objectives and policies of the City’s General Plan and the Otay Ranch GDP. See the Water Conservation Plan section of the SPA Planfor additional information. Air Quality Improvement Plan The City has included a Growth Management Element (GME) in its General Plan. One of the stated objectives of the GME is to actively plan to meet federal and state air quality standards. This objective is incorporated into the GME’s action program. In addition, the City’s Growth Management Ordinance (CVMC 19.09) requires that an Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP) be prepared for all major development projects (50 dwelling units or greater) as part of the SPA Plan process. A new AQIP has been prepared by Criterion Planners for the FC-2 SPA amendment to comply with the City’s current AQIP Guidelines. The purpose of the AQIP is to provide an analysis of air pollution impacts that would result from development and to demonstrate how the project’s design reduces vehicle trips, maintains or improves traffic flow, reduces vehicle miles traveled and reduces direct or indirect greenhouse gas emissions. FC-2 is considered as an infill project site whose AQIP value derives in large part from existing surrounding uses interface with the project site. In accordance with the AQIP Guidelines that allow for utilization of other “equivalent” alternative programs such as LEED ND to demonstrate compliance with INDEX thresholds, AQIP analysis for FC-2 was completed using the LEED-ND rating system in lieu of INDEX indicators. Based on the FC-2 project site characteristics, proposed development plan, and surrounding conditions, the AQIP analysis finds that FC-2 scores the equivalent of 56 points, which would earn a Silver certification under the LEED-ND rating system. Criterion Planning was the expert consultant, who in conjunction with City staff worked on the original development of the INDEX indicator thresholds for the City. Based on their experience with the INDEX model and certifying over 100 LEED-ND projects nationally, the consultant Page|10 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 252 of 1481 concluded that the base ND certification of 40 points is the functional equivalent of INDEX indicator thresholds. A score of 56 points exceeds the INDEX thresholds and demonstrates clear AQIP compliance. Fire Protection Plan (FPP) As determined by the Fire Chief, this project does not require anFPP because it is considered an infill site that is surrounded by manmade slopes and development. 3.Master Precise Plan Amendment Master Precise Plan text and exhibits wereupdated to reflectthe proposed new site plan for the apartments on the east half of FC-2. Overall, the apartment project is consistent with the previously established architectural theme of development and its character of a compact walkable urban community. The new wrap style buildings carry the Santa Barbara design theme of Otay Ranch, with its own unique elements of Spanish Eclectic and Contemporary California to complement the design theme of the surrounding neighborhoods. 4.Development Agreement Amendment TheDevelopment Agreement is amended to allow for up to 900 residential units and associated development triggers for provision of the secondhotel, community purpose facilities, and park requirement updates. In addition, the amendment waives the City’s PAD fee and requires an in-lieu Park Benefit Fee for any residential units constructed in excess of the originally approved 600. 5.Village 2 CPF Amendment The PA-12 Development Agreement allows for provision of CPF land offsite. This project includes an amendment to Applicant’s Village 2 CPF Agreement, which will change the timing of the delivery of the CPF land. This will ensure that the Applicant meets their CPF obligation at whichever trigger occurs first, whether Village 2 or Freeway Commercial. 6.Tentative Map The Applicant intends to build and operate the project as apartments. The purpose of the tentative subdivision map is to allocate the additional 300 units to the R/MU land use district. The tentative map creates 608 residential lots, 10 commercial lots, and 1,049 parking condominium lots on 10.405 acres of land. Project Access Access to the project area is provided from Olympic Parkway via Town Center Drive and Promenade Street, a private street. All streets will conform to the guidelines set forth in the Freeway CommercialSPA Plan and City of Chula Vista street design guidelines. Subdivision Design The subdivision design consists of 2multi-family residential lotsand1private street lot. The subdivision will allow a maximum of 608 residential units and 10 commercial units. Because parking is provided in the common structure, the map creates 1,049 condominium parking spaces. Page|11 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 253 of 1481 Grading The site is atriangularly-shaped lot bounded by Olympic Parkway on the north, Town Center Drive on the west, Otay Ranch Town Center Mall on the south, and Eastlake Parkway on the east. The east portion of Freeway Commercial was sheet-graded in 2002 as a single large pad, mildly sloping (2%) from southeast to northwest, with a temporary sediment basin near the intersection of Olympic Parkway and Town Center Drive. The pad area is generally located above the adjacent streets, with a maximum slope height of approximately 10 feet above the intersection. The Applicant must obtain a LandDevelopment Permit prior to beginning any earthwork activities at the site and before issuance ofbuilding permits in accordance with CVMCChapter 15.05. The Applicantmust also submit grading plans in conformance with the City's Subdivision Manual and theCity' s Development Storm Water Manual requirements. 7.Design Review The project includes a Design Review permit (DR17-0037) for a 578-unit multi-family development with 15,000 sq. ft. of ground floor commercial, which is consistent with and implements the intent and design vision contained in the Freeway Commercial North Design Plan and Master Precise Plan (MPP). Project Site Characteristics The 10.4-acre Project site is located within neighborhood R/MU and C/MU in the eastern portion of Freeway Commercial North, on a vacant, flat and mass graded parcel eastof Town Center Drive. It is bordered by Olympic Parkway on the north, Town Center Drive on the west, Otay Ranch Town Center mall on the south, Eastlake Parkway on the east. Project Description The project consists oftwo separate lots with a private street bisecting the two parcels. Lot 1 (Building A) proposes a 4 to 5-story building with 15,000 square-feet of retail along Town Center Drive and 237 apartment units around a 5-story parking structure. Lot 2 (Building B) proposes a 4-story building with 341 apartment units around a 5-story parking structure. There is direct access to residential units from each level of the parking garage through interior corridors. For Lot 1, the apartment unit mix is comprised of 32 studios, 117 one-bedroom, and 88 two-bedroom units. For Lot 2, the apartment unit mix is comprised of 24 studios, 173 one-bedroom, and 144 two-bedroom units. For the total of 578 units in both buildings, the unit mix is as follows: 10% studios, 50% 1-bedroom, and 40% 2-bedroom units. There are two different floor plans for a studio, five floor plans for a one-bedroom, and six floor plans for a two- bedroom unit. Each unit has a minimum 60 sq. ft. balcony The Project meets the required open space and parking for the site. Private open space is provided by balconies at each residential unit. Common open space is provided by several courtyard areas, private mini parks, two swimming pools –one at each building, dog park, tot lot, and two project entry park areas. There are two driveway entrances, one off of Town Center Drive and one off of Promenade Street. Adjacent to the south of the project is the new BRT line. Ground floor commercial is located entirely in building “A” along Town Center Drive. This building also includes a leasingoffice. Both buildings have elevators and trash chutes. Page|12 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 254 of 1481 Compliance with Development Standards The following Project Data Table shows Freeway Commercial SPA development regulations along with the Applicant’s proposal to meet said requirements. Table 4 –Project Data Table Assessor’s Parcel Number:643-020-88-00 Current Zoning:R/MU and C/MU General Plan DesignationMixed Use Residential Lot Area:10.4 ac PARKING REQUIRED:PARKING PROPOSED: ResidentialResidential Lot 1, Building A:Lot 1, Building A: 1 space per studio (x 32 units)401 spaces are provided (24 extra) 1.5 spaces per 1-bed (x 117 units) 2.0 spaces per 2-bedroom (88 units) Total: 384 spaces Lot 2, Building B: Lot 2, Building B:Total: 597 spaces are provided (25 extra) 1 space per studio (x 24 units) 1.5 spaces per 1-bed (x 173 units) 2.0 spaces per 2-bedroom (144 units) Total: 572 spaces Commercial: Commercial:Total: 67 parking spaces are provided (7 extra) 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of commercial (x 15,000 sq. ft) Total: 60 spaces Setbacks/Height REQUIRED:Setbacks/Height PROPOSED: Front: Subject to Design ReviewFront: Setback along Olympic Pkwy and Side: Subject to Design ReviewEastlake Pkwy: 18’ Rear: Subject to Design ReviewSide: Setback along Town Center Drive: 25’ Height: 75’* Rear: Setback along BRT guideway:10’ *Building features may exceed maximum height Height Bldg “A”: with Design Review approval.84’-8” to 61’-8” along Olympic Pkwy. 79’-8” along Town Center Dr. 51’-10” along Promenade St. Page|13 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 255 of 1481 Height Bldg “B”: 61’-8” to 48’-11” along Olympic Pkwy. 48’-11” along Town Center Dr. 48’-11” along Eastlake Pkwy 58’-6” along Promenade St. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED:OPEN SPACE PROPOSED: Common Useable:Common Useable: 200 sq. ft. per unit x 578 units 115,665 sq. ft. Total common space required: 115,600 sq. ft. Private Useable:Private Useable: 60 sq. ft. per unit x 578 units36,943 sq. ft. (2,263 sq. ft. over req.) Total private space required: 34,680 sq. ft. Compliance with Freeway Commercial SPA Design Guidelines Staff is utilizing the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Planned Community District Regulations and the Freeway Commercial North Master Precise Plan to evaluate this project. The applicable design criteria are first presented in italics followed by staff discussion, analysis and staff recommendation in non-italics. Site Planning and Building Placement/Orientation Encourage multi-modal street design. Enhance the pedestrian and cyclist experience. Create courtyards and paseos, extending the park experience across Town Center Drive to enhance pedestrian connections and provide a variety of places for people to socialize and enjoy nature. Neighborhood streets should promote a social street life experience. Angled parking along Town Center Drive. Well defined pedestrian circulation with pedestrian connection to nearby transit station. Project design follows the above criteria. To encourage multi-modal design, Town Center Drive is designed to provide sharrow markings connecting the project to the existing bike lane route along Olympic Parkway. Back-in diagonal parking along Town Center Drive prioritizes pedestrian and bicyclist safety and slows down traffic. The project is providing a secure onsite bike storage facility. Pedestrian and cyclist experiencesareenhanced with pedestrian- friendly features along the streets, such as tree-lined landscape parkways, hardscape with pavers in special locations and tree wells to buffer pedestrian sidewalks; setbacks to promote a pedestrian-oriented environment; pedestrian-scale façade features on sidewalk-fronting buildings such as horizontal components, overhangs, facade detail, display areas, and pedestrian seating along ground floor commercial frontage. Streets include pedestrian-scale lighting in addition to street light poles and street trees. Pedestrian breezeways are provided through the buildings in key locations to facilitate pedestrian connections. Connection to local bus stations is provided via a direct route along Town Center Drive to the bus stop on Olympic Parkway and via Promenade Street to the bus stop on Eastlake Parkway. Connection Page|14 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 256 of 1481 to the BRT Park & Ride station is provided via Town Center Drive, and along a palm tree-line pedestrian walkway through Otay Ranch Town Center mall. The innovative type of building, the so-called “Texas wrap” intrinsically encourages pedestrian activity through the nature of its building configuration. Since the parking structure cannot be seen from the street and greatly reduces surface parking, the project has an increased visual appeal and safety (i.e. minimizing pedestrian and vehicular conflict). Additionally, this style of architecture encourages pedestrian activity through a mix of uses, higher density and enhanced pedestrian-oriented design. Architectural Theme Buildings shall use simple massing forms that convey solid construction techniques. The design of all front or pedestrian-oriented building elevations shall clearly convey a distinct base, middle, and cornice feature. Building massing shall be broken up subtly into smaller units to engage the streetscape with pedestrian-scaled features. Elevations shall be articulated to reduce the box-like appearance and visual impact ofrepetitive rooflines. In larger buildings or groups of buildings, massing shall be accented with pronounced horizontal or vertical massing features. This may include a tower element, vertical stair element, horizontal colonnade or horizontal succession of porches or trellis features, a colonnade, projecting eaves, accented vertical parapet or offset parapets, or similar design features. Large, uninterrupted wall planes are prohibited. Where entries, windows, glazing, or other articulating features are not feasible, elevations shall be broken up with the use of wall plane offsets, change in materials, and/or change in color. The project design meets the requirements above. The proposed buildings on the site will take on an aesthetic of abstract Spanish with elements of contemporary California, which identifies with a lively urban lifestyle, but still rooted in history. Architectural elements such as awnings, balconies, and trellises are appended to the building for interest and reducing mass. The buildings will employ mostly exterior plaster, accented with wood siding of various hues and finishes to add interest. Furthermore, in order to avoid monolithic buildings of the same continuous height, the buildings are topped with gable and hipped roof elements adjacent to flat, parapet roofs, adding to the contemporary nature of the style. Building “A” embodies the mixed-use element of the project with a more “Irving Gill” inspired architecture, incorporating clean lines, varied roof elements, and arches. The area fronting Town Center Drive will be lined with retail function, with accent materials such as stone and wood siding materials, and a continuous storefront façade. Building “B” is all residential and will have mostly exterior plaster with enhanced materials, including wood elements such as siding and awnings. Both buildings will look different, but will complement each other through massing, color, and materials. Page|15 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 257 of 1481 Building “A,” which is situated along Town Center Drive is composed of ground floor retail serving the local residents and visitors, and 4 and 5 stories of multi-family residential units above. Building “B” contains 4 levels of multi-family residential units. The design features include: Primary enhanced architectural elements located at the corner of Town Center Drive and Olympic parkway to the north and the Otay Ranch Town Center Mall parking lot entry to the south. A park/plaza space, along with a secondary enhanced architectural element at the corner of Town Center Drive and Private Drive. Special architectural enhanced facades along Town Center Drive and Centerpark public park. Enhanced architectural elements at the corner of Promenade St. and Olympic Parkway. The interface between Building “A” and Building “B” along Promenade Street are well-defined. Both buildings employ courtyards that break up the massing along Promenade Street and avoids long stretches of shadow for a more pedestrian friendly experience. The courtyards and walkways along Promenade Street are landscaped to enhance the pedestrian experience. Amenity courtyards and vehicular entry drives for both buildings front each other andpromote ease of pedestrian flow between buildings and social interaction. Vehicular entries occur at the same intersections for both buildings to minimize curb cuts, minimizing potential conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles. Parking See Project Data Table above. The project meets its accessible parking requirement of 3 American Disabilities Act (ADA) spaces for commercial parking, 8 ADA spaces for residential parking in Building “A” and 12 ADA spaces for residential parking in Building “B.” Open Space The Freeway Commercial SPA regulations require 200 sq. ft. of Common Usable Open Space per unit in the R/MU zoning district. The project requires 115,600 sq. ft. of Common Usable Open Space for 578 units; a total of 115,665 sq. ft. is provided. The SPA Plan also requires 60 sq. ft. of Private Open Space per unitfor a total requirement of 34,680 sq. ft.; a total of 36,943 sq. ft. is provided. Storage Although the project is proposed as apartments, which do not require provision of storage space that are required for condominiums, the project provides storage space for condominiums. For studio and one- bedroom units, the required storage space is 150 cubic feet (cu. ft.); the project provides 202-364 and 189- 287 cu. ft., respectively. For two-bedroom units, the storage requirement is 200 cu. ft. and the project provides440 cu. ft. of storage space. Public Outreach On February 1, 2018 the Applicant facilitated a community meeting at the Otay Ranch Library Branch in the Otay Ranch Town Center (The Hub). Four people from the public were in attendance along with staff and Page|16 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 258 of 1481 the applicant team. The key issues raised at this meeting were California Environmental Quality Act review, traffic impacts, pedestrian safety, and adequate services citywide. Also, the residents expressed that there were more people who would be interested in attending the meeting who did not receive the meeting notice. As a result of the issues raised, staff and the Applicant informed those in attendance that a second meeting would be held. On March 12, 2018 the Applicant facilitated a second community meeting at the Otay Ranch Residence Inn, which is located onsite at the Freeway Commercial SPA. Approximately 15 people from the public were in attendance along with staff and the applicant team. Similar concerns were expressed at this meeting as the first meeting. On October 16, 2018 the Applicant facilitated a third community meeting at the Otay Ranch Residence Inn. Approximately 20 people from the public were in attendance along with staff and the applicant team. Staff prepared a response to the issues raised by the residents at the three public community meetings. The response matrix is provided as Attachment 6. Conclusion Within Freeway Commercial North, the proposed integrated land uses, development intensities and grading program directly implement the provisions of the City’s GP and the Otay Ranch GDP that foster “Smart Growth.” The proposed project provides all of the public facilities required by the Otay Ranch GDP. The additional higher-density mixed use residential located proximate to the hotels, park, and ancillary retail commercial further implement pedestrian-and transit-oriented policies and is in conformance with the goals, objectives and policies of the GP and the Otay Ranch GDP. The Development Agreement contains specific triggers for the provision of the second hotel, urban park and CPF. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 1,000 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(7) or (8), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware andhas not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT All costs associated with processing the Project are borne by the Applicant, resulting in no net impact to the General Fund or Development Services Fund. Costs associated with the processing of future implementing permits, will also be recovered by permit and processing fees. ONGOING FISCALIMPACT The proposed project results in an increase of 300 multi-family units within Freeway Commercial North. Page|17 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 259 of 1481 The Supplemental FIA for the Freeway Commercial North Amendment estimates an average positive net fiscal impact of $1,184,595 annually over thenext ten years. This represents an average decrease of approximately $95,931 annually, as compared with the approved project for the same period. See the following table for additional detail. Table 5 –Projected Net Fiscal Impact Approved ProjectProposed ProjectChange 10-Year10-Year10-Year CumulativeAverageCumulativeAverageCumulativeAverage Projected $ 17,571,885 $ 1,757,188 $ 18,997,264 $ 1,899,726 $ 1,425,379 $ 142,538 Revenues Projected Expenditures$ (4,766,623)$ (476,662)$ (7,151,311)$ (715,131)$(2,384,688)$(238,469) Projected Net Impact$ 12,805,262 $ 1,280,526 $ 11,845,953 $ 1,184,595 $ (959,309)$ (95,931) ATTACHMENTS 1.Locator Map 2.Planning Commission Resolution GDP/SPA/MPP/DAs/Addendum 3.Disclosure Statement 4.Development Agreement Amendment 5.First Amendment to CPF Agreement for Village 2 6.Issues Response Matrix to Community Meeting(s) Comments 7.Response letter –Lozeau Drury 8.GDP and SPA Amendments 9.Tentative Map 10.Design Review 11.Third EIR Addendum 12.Technical Reports Otay Ranch GDP, Freeway Commercial North SPA Amendments, Tentative Map, Design Review, and Third Addendum to FEIR 02-04, and Technical Reports (Flash drive provided) Staff Contact:Stan Donn, SeniorPlanner, Development Services Department Page|18 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 260 of 1481 RESOLUTION NO. GDPA/MPA17-0012; MPA 17-0011; IS 17-0005; DR17-0037; PCS 19-0001 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: 1) CONSIDER THIRD ADDENDUM TO FEIR02-04; 2) APPROVE AMENDMENTSTOTHEOTAYRANCHGENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (GDP); FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS,DESIGN PLAN,LAND USE DISTRICTS MAPANDASSOCIATEDREGULATORYDOCUMENTS; DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; AND OTAY RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH MASTER PRECISE PLAN FOR OTAY RANCH PLANNING AREA 12 FREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH; ANDCOMMUNITYPUBLICFACILITYAGREEMENT AMENDMENT FOR VILLAGE 2. WHEREAS, the parcel, that is the subject matter of this resolution, is represented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description is located in the northern 36-acre portion of Freeway Commercial Planning Area 12 of Otay Ranch(Project Site); and WHEREAS, on November 16, 2017, a duly verified applicationwasfiled with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin & Sons (Applicant) requesting approval ofamendmentsto the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) (MPA17-0012), Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (MPA17-0011),including the Planned Community District Regulations, and Design Plan; Master Precise Plan(MPP)and Development Agreement (DA) for the Freeway Commercial North portion of Otay Ranch Planning Area12(PA-12)to add 300 multi- family units within the easterly portion ofthe approximate 10.4acre project site, including Initial Study (IS17-0005), Design Review Permit (DR17-0037);and Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS19-0001), and a separate Community Public Facility (CPF)Agreement for Village 2 (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the property has beenthe subject matter of an amendment to the City’s General Plan (GP) and the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) approved on May 26, 2015 and adopted by City Council by Resolution No.2015-114; andthe Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Planand associated regulatory documents approved on September 13, 2016 by Resolution No. 2016-187; Tentative Map CVT 15-0007 by Resolution No. 2016-189; amendments to the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Planned Community District Regulations by Ordinance No. 2016-3376; and Design Review Permit DR16-0030 by Resolution No. 2016-189; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Directorreviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Project was covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 261 of 1481 PC Resolution MPA17-0011; MPA17-0012; IS 17-0005; DR17-0037; PCS19-0001 May 22, 2019 Page 2 for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan-Planning Area12(FEIR 02-04) (SCH #1989010154),and has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has caused for the preparationof a ThirdAddendum to FEIR 02-04; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Director set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and noticeof said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissionheld an advertisedpublic hearing on the Project, took public testimony, heard staff’s presentation, and thereafter closed the hearing. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista, after hearing public testimony, staff’s presentation and after reviewing all of the subject documents, hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Draft City Council Resolutions and Ordinancesapproving the Project in accordancewith the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista thata copy of this Resolution and the draft City Council Resolutions and Ordinances be transmitted to the City Council. Presented by:Approved as to form by: __________________________________________________________ Kelly Broughton, FSALAGlen R. Googins Development Services DirectorCity Attorney 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 262 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 263 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 264 of 1481 RECORDED AT REQUEST OFAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Attn: City Clerk Fee Exempt B Gov’t Code '6103 (Space above for Recorder’s Use) FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT between the City of Chula Vista, Village IITown Center, LLC and Sunranch Capital Partners, LLC THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Amendment) dated for reference purposesonly as of ________________, 2019, is entered into by and among THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a California charter city and municipal corporation (City), VILLAGE II TOWN CENTER, LLC, a California limited liability company (Village II) and SUNRANCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Sunranch). Village II and Sunranch are collectively referred to in this Amendment as the “Owner.” The City or the Owner are sometimes individually referred to in this Amendment as a “Party”and are collectively referred to as the “Parties.” The Parties enter into this Amendment with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A.Development Agreement. Owner and City are parties to that certain Development Agreement recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Diego, State of California, on June 17, 2015 as Doc. No. 2015-0312805 (Agreement) for the property in the City of Chula Vista, State of California, more particularly described in the Agreement. Terms defined in the Agreement shall have same meaning when used in this Amendment. B.First Hotel. A 148-room hotel meeting the requirements for the first hotel, as described in Section 5.1.1 of the Agreement, has been completed. C.CFD. A Community Facilities District (CFD) for the maintenance of the Park, as described in Section 5.3.1.3 of the Agreement, has been created. D.BRT Right of Way. The right-of-way for the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line right of way, as described in Section 5.3.3 of the Agreement, has been dedicated. City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ PA 12 –DA amendment, April 2019 1 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 265 of 1481 E.AffordableHousing Agreement. An Amended and Restated Housing Development Agreement, which provides for housing credits against Owner’s affordable housing obligations in Planning Area (PA)12, was entered into between Owner and the City in September 2017. F.Transit-Oriented Development.The City would like Owner to construct mid-rise higher density apartments with mixed-use ground floor commercial east of Town Center Drive near the BRT line, because the City finds that: a.This change to the project will promotethe principles of smart growth, maximizingland use potential within walking range of Otay Ranch BRT stationand ensuring transit-supportive densities near BRT line. b.The transit-oriented developmentwill establish a compact walkable community by replacing surface parking with 5-level structured parking,benefitingthe environment by reducing carbon emissions. c.This type of housing product, which is considered costly to construct and has not been built in Chula Vista, will improve housing affordabilityand economic development by providinga more diverse mix of housing types in a fiscally sustainable manner. d.The City wants this form of developmentand Owner is willing to fund this high-cost product. G.Amendment. Toachieve the City’s transit-oriented development objectivesand assure that both Parties can achieve the mutual benefits envisioned in the Agreement, Owner and City would like to amend the Agreement as provided in this Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the aboveRecitals and the mutual obligations of the Parties set forth herein, Owner and City agree as follows: 1.Residential Density. Maximum residential density for the FC-2 area of the Sectional Planning Area (SPA)Plan shall be amendedto allow forup to 900residential units. 2.Second Hotel. The trigger for the commencementof construction of the Second Hotel is hereby changed. Owner shall commence constructionof the Second Hotel prior to st issuance of the building permit for the 651residential unit. Section 5.1.2 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: “5.1.2Owner shall commence substantial construction of the second hotel containing 150 hotel rooms (or the number of rooms needed to bring the total hotel room count of the two hotels to a total of 300 rooms) (the “Second Hotel”) prior to issuance of thebuilding permit for the651st residential unitfor the Project. In the event that Owner has not pulled building permits and, in the reasonable City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ PA 12 –DA amendment, April 2019 2 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 266 of 1481 determination of the Director of Development Services, commenced substantial construction of the Second Hotel prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 651st residential unitfor the Project, Owner shall pay to the City the amount of $629,860 per year (the “In Lieu Hotel Payment”) as provided herein. Owner shall make the first In Lieu Hotel Payment to the City prior to the final inspection for the building permit for the 651st residential unitfor the Project. Owner shall, thereafter, make the In Lieu Hotel Payment annually on the anniversary date of the issuance of the building permit for the 651st residential unitfor the Project. Owner's obligation to make the In Lieu Hotel Payment shall continue until the earlier to occur of (a) the beginning of substantial construction, in the reasonable determination of the Director of Development Services, of the Second Hotel, or (b) the twentieth (20th) anniversary of the Effective Date of the Agreement. Owner's obligation to make the In Lieu Hotel Payment shall be secured by a security interest in the Property or, at the Owner's request, by another security interest reasonably acceptable to the City Manager and City Attorney. Owner shall, at the City's request, enter into a separate promissory note and deed of trust to secure the obligation to make the In Lieu Hotel Payment at the time of issuance of the building permit for the 651st residential unit. Failure to make the In Lieu Hotel Payment when due shall be a material breach of this Agreement and shall, in addition to other available remedies, entitle the City to foreclose on its security interest. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Owner's obligation to make the In Lieu Hotel Payment hereunder shall terminate in the event that the City issues final approval or enters into a contract for the provision of direct or indirect financial incentives to another hotel development within the Otay Ranch community, without first meeting and conferring with Owner in good faith regarding the provision of substantially equivalent financial incentives, and, if Owner's hotel qualifies for such incentives, tendering to the City Council for its consideration approval of such incentives. City Council shall reserve the right to approve or disapprove such incentives in its sole discretion.” 3.Commercial/Mixed Use. The requirement for construction of commercial development on the Property is hereby reduced. Owner shall only be required to construct 15,000 square feet of commercial development on the Property. Section 5.2 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: “5.2Construction of Commercial/Mixed Use. Owner agrees and acknowledges that the SPA Plan originally contemplated only commercial development on the Property. Although the City has agreed to amend the SPA Plan to allow residential development on the Property, commercial development is still an important use for the site. Therefore, Owner agrees to obtain building permits for and commence substantial construction of 15,000 square feet of commercial development on the Property in accordance with the Project Approvals prior to or concurrently with obtaining building permits and commencing construction of the residential development located east of Town Center Drive. The 15,000 square City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ PA 12 –DA amendment, April 2019 3 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 267 of 1481 feet of commercial development will be constructed to construction standards that qualify for commercial occupancy “B” or “M”.” 4.Park a.Park and Park Site. Section 5.3.1 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: “Based on City standards in effect as of August 2018, Owner’s park obligations (land and improvements) related to the Project would require the dedication and the improvement to City standards of up to a 7.05-acrepark on the Property, if all 900residential units are built. Owner’s actual baseline park obligations shall be established for the first 600 residential units at the time park obligations become due for those units in accordance with City standards, including, but not limited to, Chapter 17.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Codeusing the PAD fee rates in effect as of the datesof final inspection for each of the units (“Baseline Park Obligations”). Owner’s actual additional park obligations shall be established for the final (up to) 300 residential units at the time park obligations become due for those unitsin accordance with City standards, including, but not limited to, Chapter 17.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code using the PAD fee rates in effect as of the dates of final inspection for each of the units(“Additional Park Obligations”). Owner shall satisfy its actual park obligations as follows:” b.Granting of Park Site and Development of thePark. Section5.3.1.1 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: “Owner shall grant two (2) acres of the Property (the “Park Site”)to the City in a permanent easement for public usageandshall develop a highly amenitized, “turnkey” park (the “Park”) on the Park Site, as described in this Agreement, to the satisfaction ofthe Director of Development Services.The Park shall generally be located as depicted in Exhibit “B,” with the final location subject to City approval. In order to create an extraordinary public space, the Park shall generally consist of the elementsdescribed in Exhibit “E” to this Agreement. Owner shall invest substantially more to the development and granting of the Park than would be typical for a City standard park, up to andincludingthevalue equivalenttothededicationand improvementrequiredtoachievetheOwner’s Baseline Park Obligations. Owner shall commence construction of the Park prior th totheissuanceofthefive hundred thirtieth (530)residentialbuildingpermitand substantiallycompletethePark within fifteen (15) months of commencement of construction.” c.Audit and Payment of Excess Park Obligations. Section 5.3.1.2 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ PA 12 –DA amendment, April 2019 4 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 268 of 1481 “Ownershall, withinsixty(60)daysofthedateonwhichtheDirectorof DevelopmentServicesreasonablydetermines,inwriting,that the Park has been completed, exclusive of the warranty period, provide the City, for its review and approval, all documentation theCityreasonablyrequires,todeterminethecost (landand improvement)oftheOwner’sconstructionoftheParkonthe ParkSite. TheCityshallusethisinformationtopreparean auditoftheactualcosts ofthe developmentoftheParkonthe Park Site.The audit shall also compare the actual costs of the developmentoftheParkontheParkSite(includingtheactual costs incurred during the warranty period) with the value of the Owner’s actual Baseline Park Obligations.Based on this audit, Owner shall satisfy its remaining park obligations, if any, by paying the excessparkobligationstotheCity’sPAD feeaccountforthe developmentofotherparksineastern Chula Vista. Such excesspark obligationsshallbecalculatedthroughtheauditandshallbe paid as either a pro rata permit fees collected in connection with anyremainingresidential permitsor,ifnoresidentialpermits remain,inalumpsumpaymenttotheCity madewithinsixty (60)daysoftheaudit,orsuchlaterdateasisapprovedbythe Director of Development Services.” c.Park Benefit Fees. Section 5.3.1.5 is added, as follows: “Park Benefit Fees.The development of the Park described in Section 5.3.1.1 of the Agreement will satisfy the Developer’s Baseline Park Obligation. Given the lack of available acreage that could be acquired to serve the Project, the City hereby waives PAD fees for the remaining 300 residential units. Developer shall meet its Additional Park Obligation for each residential unit in excess of 600 through payment ofa Park BenefitFee. The Park Benefit Fee shall be in an amount equal to the PAD fees that would otherwise have been due pursuant to Chapter 17.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. The Park Benefit Fee shall be due and payable no earlier than building permit issuance, but no later than final inspection and shall be assessed using the PAD fee rates in effect as of the date of payment. Park Benefit Fees may be utilized by the City to acquire or develop parkland serving the City’s eastern territories.” 5.Community Purpose Facilities. Section 5.3.2 of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: “Owner shall provide a total of 3.24 acres of net usable land for Community Purpose Facilities (CPF) if all 900residential units are built. If not all 900 residential units are built, then Owner shall provide a pro-rated amount of CPF in accordance with the actual amount of the total number of residential units built (e.g. 900 residential units = 3.24 acres of net usable land for CPF; while 700 residential units = 2.52 acres of net usable land for CPF). Owner may satisfy this CPF requirement in any manner consistent with Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19.48.025, which may include the provision of the CPF land offsite, City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ PA 12 –DA amendment, April 2019 5 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 269 of 1481 alternative compliance, or adjustments to the percentage limitations on the types of facilities, including recreational facilities, that may count toward satisfying the CPF requirement, all in the discretion of the Director of Development Services. Owner shall commence grading of the CPF land or begin alternative compliance prior to the issuance of the building permit for the five hundred thirtieth (530th) residential unit.” 6.Term.The Agreement shall have a remaining term of twenty (20) years from the effective date of the enabling ordinance by which this Amendment is approved, subject to extension as provided in Section 6.1.1. 7.Full Force. Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 8.Authority. Each party represents that it has full right, power and authority to execute this Amendment and to perform its obligations hereunder, without the need for any further action under its governing instruments, and the parties executing this Amendment on the behalf of such party are duly authorized agents with authority to do so. \[Signatures on following page\] City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ PA 12 –DA amendment, April 2019 6 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 270 of 1481 Owner and City have executed this Amendment, which is effective as of the effective date of the enabling ordinance which is at second reading of the City Council. CITYOWNER CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a California VILLAGE II TOWN CENTER, LLC, a charter city and municipal corporationCalifornia limited liability company* By:By: Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor Name: Title: Date: ATTEST:By: Name: Title: By:Date: Kerry K. Bigelow, City Clerk SUNRANCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, a APPROVED AS TO FORM:Delaware limited liability company* By: Name: By: Glen R. Googins, City AttorneyTitle: By: Name: Title: Date: J:\\Attorney\\MichaelSh\\Freeway Commercial -2019\\DA-Amendment\\DAAmend-FwyComml-4.25.19-5.13.19-Final.docx City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ PA 12 –DA amendment, April 2019 7 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 271 of 1481 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On , ____, before me, , NotaryPublicinandforsaidState,personallyappeared _________________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature(Seal) City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ PA 12 –DA amendment, April 2019 8 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 272 of 1481 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On , ____, before me, , NotaryPublicinandforsaidState,personallyappeared _________________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature(Seal) City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ PA 12 –DA amendment, April 2019 9 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 273 of 1481 RECORDED AT REQUEST OFAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Attn: City Clerk Fee Exempt B Gov’t Code '6103 (Space above for Recorder’s Use) FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY ACREAGE FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, and OTAY PROJECT, L.P THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY ACREAGE FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO ("Amendment") dated and effective as of ________________, 201__,(the "Effective Date")is entered into by and among THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("City"), and OTAY PROJECT, L.P., a California limited partnership ("OPLP"). The City or OPLPare sometimes individually referred to in this Amendment as a "Party" and are collectively referred to as the "Parties". The Parties enter into this Amendment with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A.CPF Agreement. OPLPand City are parties to that certain Agreement for the Provision of Community Purpose Facility (CPF) Acreage for Otay Ranch Village Two dated August 22, 2012 and recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Diego, State of California, on November19, 2012as Doc. No. 2012-0722469 ("Agreement") for the property in the City of Chula Vista, State of California, more particularly described in the Agreement. Terms defined in the Agreement shall have same meaning when used in this Amendment. B.Timingof Delivery of CPF Site. The Parties would like to change the provision of the Agreement regarding the timing of delivery of the Restricted Acreage, asprovided below in this Amendment. C.Amendment. Toassure that both Parties can achieve the mutualbenefits envisioned in the Agreement, OPLPand City areamendingthe Agreement as provided in this Amendment. City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ 1 V2 –CPF agreement amendment.14dec18 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 274 of 1481 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals and the mutual obligations of the Parties set forth herein, OPLPand City agree as follows: 1.Delivery of the CPF Site. The trigger for the delivery of the CPF Site is hereby changed. Rather than using a fixed number of units, the trigger shall be based on a percentage of units built. ArticleIV.,Section A. of the Agreement (Delivery of CPF Site -Timing of Development) is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: A A.Timing of Development. Prior to the issuance of building permit for the residential unit representing 75% of the total number of units to be constructed in Village 2, OPLP shall have graded the Restricted Acreage to a 3% or less slope, cleared any and all obstructions on the property, and established legal access and installed utility connections up to the property boundary.” 2.Full Force. Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3.Recording. This Amendment shall be recorded by OPLP against all properties zoned for residential development owned by OPLP located within Village 2 within fifteen (15) calendar days of the Effective Date. \[Remainder of page intentionallyleft blank\] City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ 2 V2 –CPF agreement amendment.14dec18 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 275 of 1481 SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY ACREAGE FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, and OTAY PROJECT, L.P IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and OPLP have executed this Amendment, indicating thatthey have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: CITYOPLP CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a California OTAY PROJECT, L.P., charter city and municipal corporationa California limited partnership * By:By: Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor Name: Title: ATTEST:By: Name: Title: By: Kerry K. Bigelow, City Clerk*Attach partnership signature authority. APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Glen R. Googins, City Attorney J:\\Attorney\\MichaelSh\\Village 2\\CPF Agreement\\V2-FirstAmendCPFAgrmnt-12.26.18-Final.docx City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ 3 V2 –CPF agreement amendment.14dec18 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 276 of 1481 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On , ____, before me, , NotaryPublicinandforsaidState,personallyappeared _________________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature(Seal) City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ 4 V2 –CPF agreement amendment.14dec18 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 277 of 1481 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On , ____, before me, , NotaryPublicinandforsaidState,personallyappeared _________________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature(Seal) City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: ________ 5 V2 –CPF agreement amendment.14dec18 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 278 of 1481 Freeway Commercial Density Increase Issuesand Responses MPA17-0011/DR17-0037 IssueResponse 1Additional units will cause increased traffic,A traffic study for the proposed project was including pedestrian safetyconcerns.prepared by Chen Ryan, a registered Traffic Engineer, and was reviewed by the City’s registered Traffic Engineer. The adjacent roadways will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service during both the AMand PM peak hours. In addition to project intersections, the study also analyzedtheproject in conjunction with otherprojectsalready built to examinethe cumulative effects. A buildout analysis was conducted which includes all traffic from regional and local growth, as well as all planned cumulative projects. The forecast traffic volume was obtained from one of City’s most recently approved Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs)(University Village EIR). The traffic study also analyzedpedestrian counts and signal timing for pedestrian safety. The signal timing calculation includedpedestrian crossing timingwhich confirmed that the project does not result in any impact to pedestrian safety at the intersections analyzed. The study concluded that all roadways and intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levelsof service, and the addition of project traffic will not result in any traffic impacts on any of the study segments and intersections. 2Schoolswill be overcrowded.The project is served by theChula Vista Elementary School District and Sweetwater Union High School District. In letters to the Applicant dated December 11, 2018 and January 31, 2019 both school districtshave indicated to the Applicant that there are no objections to the project and they have enough capacity to serve the students from the project. 3There is not enough watersupplyto serve The Otay Water District (OWD) is the supplier of the project.water to this project and OWD in its letter dated December 14, 2017 to the Applicant has determined that it has adequate supplies and infrastructure to serve the project. 1 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 279 of 1481 Freeway Commercial Density Increase Issuesand Responses MPA17-0011/DR17-0037 4Police and fire service will be inadequate Developer will pay impact fees to the City to cover with additional units.the cost for additional police and fire facilities. 5.What is the CEQA review requirement for Section 21002 of the California Environmental Act the project?(CEQA)requires that an EIRidentify the significant effects of a project on the environment and provide measures or alternatives that can mitigate or avoid those significant effects. The Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA)was analyzed in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Plan -Planning Area 12 (FEIR 02-04) (SCH #1989010154). The First Addendum to the FEIR was approved for the General Plan and Otay Ranch General Development Plan Amendments in May 2015. The Second Addendum to the FEIR was approved for the SPA Plan Amendment in September 2016. The First and Second Addendums to the FEIR analyzed the impact of the General Plan, General Development Plan and SPA Plan amendments, based on the urban, mixeduse development proposal. As a result of this analysis, the basic conclusions and impacts identified in FEIR 02-04 were determined to not have changed. The land use and public service impacts for the proposed project are found to be less than significant and were adequately covered in FEIR 02-04 for the previoustwoAddendums. Therefore,in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared the Third Addendum to the FEIR. The Third Addendum provides an environmental analysis of the potential impacts associated with implementing the proposed Freeway Commercial SPA Plan and Master Precise Plan Amendment. As a result of this analysis, the basic conclusions and impacts identified in FEIR 02-04 were determined to not have changed. The land use and public service impacts are found to be less than significant for this SPA Plan amendment, Design Review and Tentative Map proposed project and were adequately covered in FEIR 02-04. 6.Are citywide services adequate to serve the A Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) has been proposed density increase?prepared as a supplemental document to the original PFFP dated April 1, 2003. The Freeway 2 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 280 of 1481 Freeway Commercial Density Increase Issuesand Responses MPA17-0011/DR17-0037 Commercial North Supplemental PFFP for this project analyzes the proposed 300-unit addition, any potential impacts on public facilities and services, and identifies the facilities, phasing and timing triggers for the provision of facilities and services to serve the project, consistent with the City’s Quality of Life Threshold Standards. The PFFP describes in detail the cost, financing mechanism and timing for construction of necessary public facilities based on the project’s proposed phasing. The public facilities needed to serve the project will be guaranteed by placing conditions of approval on the Tentative Map, requiring payment of various fees at the building permit stage, and/or continuing payment of bond payments under the approved Community Facilities Districts to finance or maintain public facilities. The PFFP included an analysis of transportation, drainage, water, sewer, fire, schools, libraries, parks, and fiscal impacts of the project. 3 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 281 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 282 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 283 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 284 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 285 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 286 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 287 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 288 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 289 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 290 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 291 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 292 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 293 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 294 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 295 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 296 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 297 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 298 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 299 of 1481 Pop. 2,494 98,88099,18012,391 113,765114,065 Page 300 of 1481 9,4497,8955,555 22,899 Total Ac. 61.3 692.7754.0 Art. Ac. Sp. Open 4,029.65,656.74,036.2 13,722.5 279.3279.3 Uni. Ac. Ac. 423.2423.2 Acreage 3.3 Ac. 212.9252.0468.2 C'ml. 55 230.10.010.0250. Sch Ac. 8 2.3 Ac. 17.1 CPF 105. 104.7124.1 Overall Project Summary 9 3.4 12.5 Ac. 262.5264.278.4 Park Ac. Res. 3,213.91,885.41,499.86,599.0 779 4,189 Total Units 34,50834,80839,47639,776 MF 1,558 Units 23,35623,65624,91425,214 Dwelling Units SF 779 2,631 Units 11,15214,562 Overall Project Summary Table - Parcel Ysidro Otay Valley ParcelProctor Valley ParcelSanMountains ParcelTotal: Exhibit 18a 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet o o o o o o o o o 4 TheDUnumberreflectsallresidentialdevelopmentontheOtayValleyParcelexcludingtheUniversity/RTPsite, however, a portion of Village Nine and Village Ten have a secondary land use designation of residential which are not included in the maximumDU. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 301 of 1481 B Pop. 4,8731,1417,9956,8304,3695,0106,749 9,288 454** 11,73414,72615,64610,51998,88099,654 10,774 Approx. 1,475**** ach land use Page 302 of 1481 19.669.1 774.7368.4394.8496.4393.6373.0536.3303.9323.0150.7489.0376.1215.8209.0182.09,449 41.3** 1,067.32,706.6 Total Ac. 128.6**** 6.0 46.563.519.811.415.458.317.140.026.166.571.069.1 2.5**182.0692.7 7.8**** Art. Ac. 6.82.8 70.422.038.852.716.551.419.6 264.8226.3129.5233.4188.0 12.4** 2,706.64,029.6 26.1**** Open Sp. Ac. the total. 41.3 Uni. 238.0279.3 Ac. 82.539.985.0 Ind. 215.8423.2 se is not included in the total. as determined in the Development Agreement. + Acreage + * 6.32.07.2 * + Ac. *** 10.015.0 0.8**161.1212.9 C'ml. 11.3 2.2**** ndary land use is not included in The secondary land u 8.39.26.0 10.019.810.010.060.042.419.835.0 0.9**230.5 Sch Ac.8.3**** Parcel satisfied offsite. A lieu fees or combination thereof, - 4.21.66.35.04.39.4 Ac. 13.412.611.313.710.012.9 CPF 0.6**104.7 13.98 2.1**** that may be Otay Valley A ion 7.97.69.37.6 23.124.065.816.635.227.510.0 27.9 0.9**262.5 30.25 obligat 10.4**** Park Ac. 130,000 square feet), Village 3 (20,000 square feet), Village 8 East (20,000 square feet); therefore, actual acreage within e way. - of - Village 8 West and Village 9; therefore, actual acreage within each land use will be determined at final map. 82.694.4 703.2346.0147.5370.7282.0234.3356.0177.4113.1306.7 23.2** 3,213.9 Res. Ac. 71.7**** additional Park and CPF 350 3,9764,5451,5972,8132,4381,4565,6104,0001,7402,3903,893 Total Units3,593 161** 34,50834,808 any 504**** , which may be satisfied onsite, offsite or through in 595448 MF 93** Units1,5223,9411,5501,4974,0463,7341,0451,3853,5933,893 23,656 23,356 213**** for the project Dwelling Units SF 604350941266695 68** 2,4541,0021,2631,0081,5641,005 Units 11,152 291**** actual net site acreage not including Village 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 125 - Acreage shown represents the total obligationAcreage shown represents + Commercial development may occur vertically or horizontally within Village 2 (up to ++ Open Space includes open space preserve, undevelopable land, streets, and right A B Exhibit 19 Otay Valley Parcel Land Use Table Village 1Village 2Village 3Village 4Village 5Village 6Village 7Village 8Village 9Portion of University/Village 9 (Alternative)**University/RTPVillage 10Portion of University(Alternative)****Village 11Plng. Area 12Plng. Area 18Plng. Area 20Open Space++SRPublicArterialTotal:will be determined at final map.* 1,800,000 square feet of commercial may occur vertically or horizontally within ** Portion of University/Village 9 has a primary land use designation of University and a secondary land use of residential. *** Commercial included as component of residential acreage.**** Portion of University has a primary land use designation of University and a secondary land use of residential. The seco Planning Area 12 (EUC & FC2) Use Dwelling UnitsAcreage***** Approx. Open Pop. SFMFTotalDensRes.Park*CPF**Sch.***C'ml.****Art.Total Sp. EUC 2,9932,99341.2072.623.210.76.026.633.5146.07,722 Regional 9.926.6 Commercial Visitor 4.59.9 Commercial Cultural 17.24.5 Off-Low 10.417.2 Rise/Bus. Off- Med/high 10.0 Rise Other+ 1.51.5 EUC 2,9932,99341.2072.623.210.76.068.61.533.5216.17,722 Subtotal FC1 86.237.5123.7 FC260060027.5021.84.72.2 B 6.31.336.31,5662,340 AA 90090033.726.77.053.24 FC Subtotal60060027.5021.84.72.2 B 92.51.337.5160.0 AA 90090033.726.77.053.24 TOTAL3,5933,59338.1094.427.919.99,288 6.0161.12.871.0376.1 3,8933,89341.299.330.2513.9410,062 * Part of park acreage requirement have been allocated to community parks. Actual park size to be determined at the SPA level. Park acreage based onratio of 3.0 acres per 1000 persons A Acreage shown representsthe total obligationfor the project, which may be satisfied onsite, offsite or through in-lieu feesor combination thereof, as determined in the Development Agreement. B Acreage shown represents actual net site acreagenot including additional Park and CPFobligation to be satisfied offsite. ** CPF acreage based on ratio of 1.39 acres per 1000 persons. Squarefootage equivalent may be considered at SPA Plan level. *** School acres will divert to residential if not needed for school **** May include mixed-use and multi-use. ***** The maximum permitted non-residential areas may alternatively be measured in sq. ft. up to the maximum projected yield of 3,487,000 st. ft. for EUC; 960,000 sq. ft. for FC1; 12,000 sq. ft. for JPB portion within EUC; excludes FC2 area + Fire Station ++6.3 acres hotel and additional 15,000 to 30,000 sq. ft. of commercialcomponent of Mixed Use Residential Exhibit 62Planning Area Twelve (EUC & FC) Land Use Table 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 303 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 304 of 1481 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 305 of 1481 o o o o o o o o o o o o 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 306 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 307 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 308 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 309 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 310 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 311 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 312 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 313 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 314 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 315 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 316 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 317 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 318 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 319 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 320 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 321 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 322 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 323 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 324 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 325 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 326 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 327 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 328 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 329 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 330 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 331 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 332 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 333 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 334 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 335 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 336 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 337 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 338 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 339 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 340 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 341 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 342 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 343 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 344 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 345 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 346 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 347 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 348 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 349 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 350 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 351 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 352 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 353 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 354 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 355 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 356 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 357 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 358 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 359 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 360 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 361 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 362 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 363 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 364 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 365 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 366 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 367 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 368 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 369 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 370 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 371 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 372 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 373 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 374 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 375 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 376 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 377 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 378 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 379 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 380 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 381 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 382 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 383 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 384 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 385 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 386 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 387 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 388 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 389 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 390 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 391 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 392 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 393 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 394 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 395 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 396 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 397 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 398 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 399 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 400 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 401 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 402 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 403 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 404 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 405 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 406 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 407 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 408 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 409 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 410 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 411 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 412 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 413 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 414 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 415 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 416 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 417 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 418 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 419 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 420 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 421 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 422 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 423 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 424 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 425 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 426 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 427 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 428 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 429 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 430 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 431 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 432 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 433 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 434 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 435 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 436 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 437 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 438 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 439 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 440 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 441 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 442 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 443 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 444 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 445 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 446 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 447 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 448 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 449 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 450 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 451 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 452 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 453 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 454 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 455 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 456 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 457 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 458 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 459 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 460 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 461 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 462 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 463 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 464 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 465 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 466 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 467 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 468 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 469 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 470 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 471 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 472 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 473 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 474 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 475 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 476 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 477 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 478 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 479 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 480 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 481 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 482 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 483 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 484 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 485 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 486 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 487 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 488 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 489 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 490 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 491 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 492 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 493 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 494 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 495 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 496 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 497 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 498 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 499 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 500 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 501 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 502 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 503 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 504 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 505 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 506 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 507 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 508 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 509 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 510 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 511 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 512 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 513 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 514 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 515 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 516 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 517 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 518 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 519 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 520 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 521 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 522 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 523 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 524 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 525 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 526 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 527 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 528 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 529 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 530 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 531 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 532 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 533 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 534 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 535 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 536 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 537 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 538 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 539 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 540 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 541 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 542 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 543 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 544 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 545 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 546 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 547 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 548 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 549 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 550 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 551 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 552 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 553 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 554 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 555 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 556 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 557 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 558 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 559 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 560 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 561 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 562 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 563 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 564 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 565 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 566 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 567 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 568 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 569 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 570 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 571 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 572 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 573 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 574 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 575 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 576 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 577 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 578 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 579 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 580 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 581 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 582 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 583 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 584 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 585 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 586 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 587 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 588 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 589 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 590 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 591 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 592 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 593 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 594 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 595 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 596 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 597 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 598 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 599 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 600 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 601 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 602 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 603 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 604 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 605 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 606 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 607 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 608 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 609 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 610 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 611 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 612 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 613 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 614 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 615 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 616 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 617 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 618 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 619 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 620 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 621 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 622 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 623 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 624 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 625 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 626 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 627 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 628 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 629 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 630 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 631 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 632 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 633 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 634 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 635 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 636 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 637 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 638 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 639 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 640 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 641 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 642 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 643 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 644 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 645 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 646 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 647 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 648 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 649 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 650 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 651 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 652 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 653 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 654 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 655 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 656 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 657 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 658 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 659 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 660 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 661 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 662 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 663 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 664 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 665 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 666 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 667 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 668 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 669 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 670 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 671 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 672 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 673 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 674 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 675 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 676 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 677 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 678 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 679 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 680 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 681 of 1481 i 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 682 of 1481 ii 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 683 of 1481 iii 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 684 of 1481 iv 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 685 of 1481 5 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 686 of 1481 1 Housing Element of the General Plan. April 23, 2013 6 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 687 of 1481 7 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 688 of 1481 8 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 689 of 1481 9 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 690 of 1481 10 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 691 of 1481 11 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 692 of 1481 2 12 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 693 of 1481 13 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 694 of 1481 14 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 695 of 1481 After initial sale of the affordable units to a low- income household, all subsequent buyers of such units must also be income eligible and the unity must be sold at an affordable price. A developer may opt to have no income or sales price restriction for subsequent buyers, provided 15 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 696 of 1481 however that After initial sale of the affordable units to a low-income household, all subsequent buyers of such units must also be income eligible and the unity must be sold at an affordable price. A developer may opt to have no income or sales price restriction for subsequent buyers, provided however that After initial sale of the affordable units to a low-income household, all subsequent buyers of such units must also be income eligible and the unity must be sold at an affordable price. A developer may opt to have no income or sales price restriction for subsequent buyers, provided however that After initial sale of the affordable units to a low-income household, all subsequent buyers of such units must also be income eligible and the unity must be sold at an affordable price. A developer may opt to have no income or sales price restriction for subsequent buyers, provided however that 16 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 697 of 1481 17 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 698 of 1481 18 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 699 of 1481 19 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 700 of 1481 A. RENTAL UNITS’ COMPLIANCE PACKET AND AUDIT Should a Developer seek approval by the City to credit a tenant toward its low and/or moderate income housing obligation, the Developer must give the City, at a minimum, a report verifying compliance with the terms of this document and/or the subsidizing financing program consisting of the following: Supplemental Rental Application -Exhibit 1 Semi-Annual Report –Exhibit 2A and 2B Authorization to Release Information Acknowledgement that the information is for the City’s Reporting and Administration use only. The Developer shall not be required to perform any extraordinary investigation or verification regarding such information other than the Developer’s usual and customary means of income verification. The methods of income verification may vary based upon the nature of the income reported by the tenant, and may include employment verification, copies of recent paycheck stubs, evidence of social security or other government payments, or copies of tax returns. The Developer shall retain the Supplemental RentalApplication and any supporting documents for a period of at least three (3) years after the applicant ceases to occupy a low and/or moderate income housing unit. A household occupying a designated low and/or moderate income unit whose annual income increases subsequent to occupying said unit (referred to as “over income household”) and thus exceeds the 80% of area median income for low income households or 120% of area median income for moderate income households, need not vacate the apartment. However, atthe Developer’s discretion, this over income household’s monthly rent (including utilities) may be increased to the market rate. Regardless of a rent increase, the Developer can no longer credit this over income household towards its 5% low income requirement and is obligated to replace this unit by renting the next comparable unit to a low income household as per the paragraph below. Thus, the Developer shall provide income information biannually and acknowledge that should its income increase, the household may be subject to a higher rent. Adjusted monthly incomes can be calculated using rules according to the HUD Handbook 4350/3 Occupancy Requirements for HUD Subsidized Multifamily Housing. The location of the designated units may change over time (to bereferred to as “floating units”) as long as the total number of affordable units remains 20 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 701 of 1481 constant and that substituted units are comparable in terms of size, features, and the number of bedrooms, as determined by the Director of the Community Development Department. If the over income household does not vacate the unit, the Developer must assure that when the next comparable apartment becomes vacant, the newly available unit must be rented to a low income household, as a floating unit, to replace the previously designated unit no longer housing a low and/or moderate income household. If the over income household chooses to leave, the vacated unit retains its low income unit designation. If a residential apartment complex is designated as 100% low and/or moderate income, the over income household will not be required to vacate, if it pays the increased rent, and the unit will not be replaced with a “floating unit.” When the over income household vacates the unit, the unit retains its low income unit designation. If the City determines that an outside audit is necessary to verify the accuracy of the submitted rent roll, then on a basis no more frequently than once a year, it may require such an audit at the expense of the Developer. In such an event, within ten(10) days after delivery of the City’s written request for such outside audit, the Developer shall deliver to the City the name of three (3) certified public accountants doing business in the Metropolitan San Diego area. The City will promptly deliver to the Developer notice of approval by the City of one or more of said names. The audit shall be completed by an approved certified public accountant, at the Developer’s sole cost and expense, within sixty (60) days after the delivery to the Developer of the City’s approval. The certified public accountant shall promptly deliver a copy of the written audit to the City. Such audit shall be an audit of the Developer’s records, including the information supplied to the Developer by the low income tenants. The auditor shall not be required to verify the accuracy of the information provided by the low-income tenants. B. HOME OWNERSHIP UNITS’ COMPLIANCE PACKET Should the Developer seek approval by the City to credit a home purchase toward its low and/or moderate income housing obligation, the Developer must give the City, at a minimum, a compliance packet including the following: Copy of Settlement Sheet Final 1003 Final Uniform Underwriting Transmittal Summary Good Faith Estimate Authorization to Release Information by Purchaser Annual Certification of Homebuyer to include a copy of tax information and copy of phone or other utility bill 21 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 702 of 1481 Acknowledgement that the information is for the City’s Reporting and Administration use only Verification of low and/or moderate-income buyer is to be completed by the Developer on behalf of the City. The Developer shall not be required to perform any extraordinary investigation or verification regarding such information other than the Developer’s usual and customary means of income identification. The methods used to verify income will vary depending upon the nature of sources of income reported by the buyer, but may include employment verification, review of recent paycheck stubs, government or social security payments, or a review ofrecent tax returns. The Developer may contact the City’s Community Development Housing Division’s Housing Coordinator to confirm the City’s acceptance of the applicant as credit toward the Developer’s low and/or moderate income housing unit obligation. The Developer may contact the City prior to the sale of the unit for consultation purposes if desired; however, approval will be given in writing only after the required documents are reviewed and accepted by the City. 22 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 703 of 1481 23 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 704 of 1481 24 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 705 of 1481 25 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 706 of 1481 EXHIBIT 1A CITY/HA SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL APPLICATION Insert Name Apartments Supplemental Application Insert Name Apartments offers apartments located at Insert Address . The units consist of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units. For more information about Insert Name Apartments, the units, floorplans, etc, please stop by the Rental Office at ___________________________________, Chula Vista, CA 9191 . The purpose of this program is to provide affordable rental opportunities for low-income households and to ensure that City of Chula Vista meet the goals set forth in Element and HUD approved Consolidated Plan. The City of Chula Vista and Insert Ownership Name welcomes your interest in Insert Name Apartments and requests that you read this information in its entirety. It is very important that you understand ALL of the program requirements. Once you agree to rent an affordable unit you are bound by all of the requirements. AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS In order to qualify to rent an Affordable Housing Unit, applicants must meet ALL of the requirements outlined within this document. Income restrictions apply. Please refer to the chart below for the MAXIMUM gross income based upon household size, which is defined as the total number of people residing within the household. You must be able to provide evidence that the people you list as household occupants will reside in the affordable unit. Gross income is the total amount of income earned by all persons, over the age of 18, within the household before all standard withdrawals (including federal tax, state tax, social security, etc.) Affordable Unit Restrictions The restrictions set forth in the Table below shall establish the maximum rental rate, which shall be adjusted for family size appropriate for the Affordable Unit, from which a utility allowance as approved by the City Manager shall be deducted. The family size appropriate for the Affordable Unit for purposes of establishing the maximum rental rate shall be calculated at one person per bedroom plus one. Exhibit _-1 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 707 of 1481 EXHIBIT 1A CITY/HA SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL APPLICATION TABLE OF RENT AND INCOME RESTRICTION CRITERIA UNIT TYPE MAXIMUM MONTHLY MAXIMUM INCOME OF RENTS ELIGIBLE TENANTS th 1-Bedroom 1/12 of 30% of 50% of AMI 50% of AMI th 1-Bedroom 1/12 of 30% of 60% of AMI 60% of AMI th 2-Bedroom 1/12 of 30% of 50% of AMI 50% of AMI th 2-Bedroom 1/12 of 30% of 60% of AMI 60% of AMI th 3-Bedroom 1/12 of 30% of 50% of AMI 50% of AMI th 3-Bedroom 1/12 of 30% of 60% of AMI 60% of AMI the respective percentages set forth in the Table of Rent and Income Restriction Criteria set forth in Section 1(a), above, as adjusted for family size; and (ii) who own no interests in real property other than a timeshare which may be used for a maximum of one month per year. For purposes of this Declaration, the current annual area median income shall be the area median income defined by HUD as the then current area median income for the San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos Metropolitan Statistical Area, established periodically by HUD and published in the Federal Register, as adjusted for family size. The rents and the occupancy restrictions shall be deemed adjusted, from time to time, in accordance with any adjustments that are authorized by HUD or any successor agency. In the event HUD ceases to publish an established area median income as aforesaid, Lender may, in its sole discretion, use any other reasonably comparable method of computing adjustments in area median income. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, to the extent any other restrictions applicable to the Property limit the rent and/or occupancy of the Property, the most restrictive shall apply. Exhibit _-2 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 708 of 1481 EXHIBIT 1A CITY/HA SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL APPLICATION ADDITIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS RENT SELECTION CRITERIA \[Insert if Applicable\] The Property Management Company will use the following criteria in order to determine priority for rental of an Affordable Unit. A point system has been established so that applicants with a higher number of points will receive preference for units. \[Insert Point System if Applicable\] Exhibit _-3 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 709 of 1481 EXHIBIT 1A CITY/HA SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL APPLICATION AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESTRICTIONS APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS Applicants will be contacted by the rental office staff via U.S. mail acknowledging receipt of complete application and supporting documentation. The property manager and the City will review all applications to determine eligibility. Eligible applications will be forwarded to _____________ to be reviewed for eligibility. Please be advised that your financial information will be reviewed for two different purposes: To determine that your household annual income does NOT exceed the maximum allowed by the City of Chula Vista for the Affordable Housing. ALL income will be considered for all persons living in the home who are 18 years or older, even if the income is not taxable income. To determine if your income, employment history and credit rating are sufficient to qualify for a rental. Before you submit your complete application and supporting documentation please ask yourself the following questions. Do you: Meet ALL the program requirements? Have a good credit rating? Have stable income? Fill out the attached application and submit it plus ALL required documentation and MAIL to: ATTN: Insert Ownership Name, LP Insert Name Apartments _____________________ _____________________ Exhibit _-4 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 710 of 1481 EXHIBIT 1A SAMPLE SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL APPLICATION AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT APPLICATION (1) APPLICANT #1 Name Social Security Number Age Address City State Zip Code Employer Name and Address Position/Title Home Phone Work Phone Marital Status: Single Divorced Married Gender: _______________ 2) APPLICANT #2 Name Social Security Number Age Address City State Zip Code Employer Name and Address Position/Title Home Phone Work Phone Marital Status: Single Divorced Married Gender: _______________ Exhibit __-5 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 711 of 1481 EXHIBIT 1A SAMPLE SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL APPLICATION HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION: List ALL household members Including Applicant(s) that will reside in the Affordable Housing Unit. Attach proof of this information. Total # of persons in Household ______ Total yearly Household Income $ _____________ Total Household Assets $________________ ______ Name Age Relationship to Applicant ______ Name Age Relationship to Applicant ______ Name Age Relationship to Applicant ______ Name Age Relationship to Applicant ______ Name Age Relationship to Applicant ______ Name Age Relationship to Applicant Exhibit __-6 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 712 of 1481 EXHIBIT 1A SAMPLE SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL APPLICATION RENTER SELECTION CRITERIA INFORMATION: Selection of Tenants: Absent a Master List described above, selection of tenants shall be made randomly by lottery within the following levels of priority, subject in all circumstances to applicable limitations imposed by law, including, without limitation, the Fair Housing Act under Federal law: If you respond YES to any of the questions below, you MUST provide written evidence with your application satisfactory to the City of Chula Vista or you may not receive all eligible points. 1) Did you have to leave your most recent PRIMARY residence due to either: Being displaced from your primary residence as a result of an action of City or Agency, a condominium conversio expiration of affordable housing covenants applicable to such residence, or residence was located, and the household resided in such housing as the or event. Yes No How long has this home been your primary residence? 2+ years 1 year Less than 1 year 2) Does your Household meet one of the following criteria: (i) households which are displaced from their primary residence as a result of an action of City or of affordable housing covenants applicable to such residence, or closure of a mobile residence for at least one year but less than two years prior to such action or event; (ii) households with at least one member who resides within the City, as that full-time employment; or (iv) households with at least one member who is expected to live within the City as a result of a bona fide offer of employment within the City. Yes No Exhibit __-7 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 713 of 1481 EXHIBIT 1A SAMPLE SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL APPLICATION No discrimination herein may be used for the purpose or effect of delaying or otherwise denying admission to the Property or unit based on the race, color, ethnic origin, gender, religion, disability, or age of any member of the applicant. AFFORDABLE HOUSING APPLICATION CHECKLIST This checklist contains a list of documents that you are REQUIRED to submit, along with the completed Application as part of the application review process. Please review the list carefully and include COPIES of all documents that you are submitting. If there are any documents listed that you do not believe you are required to submit please indicate N/A and state the reason why the information is not attached. You must attach this signed checklist as part of your application packet. APPLICATIONS THAT ARE MISSING DOCUMENTATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. Two months of most current and consecutive bank/investment/retirement statements for ALL accounts (all pages) Most recent paycheck stubs covering a 30-day period for each borrower Most recent one (1) year W-2s and/or 1099s for each borrower Most recent one (1) year Federal Tax Returns for each borrower (all schedules) Complete divorce decree(s) with all attachments, if applicable Complete bankruptcy papers with all schedules and discharge papers for bankruptcies within the last 7 years, if applicable Copy of Resident Alien Card, front and back, if applicable or other appropriate proof of legal U.S. residency If you are self-employed, also provide the following: Most recent three (3) years tax returns and copies of 1040s, W-2s, 1099s and/or K-1s for each borrower Limited or General Partnership returns (if ownership interest is 25% or greater)-copies of form 1065 Sub Chapter S Corporation returns (if ownership interest is 25% or greater)-copies of form 1120 S U.S. Corporation returns (if ownership interest is 25% or greater)- copies of form 1120 YTD Profit and Loss Statement (in some cases this may need to be audited) Exhibit __-8 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 714 of 1481 EXHIBIT 1A SAMPLE SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL APPLICATION AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT AFFIDAVIT By signing below each applicant makes the following certifications: I understand and agree with the answers I have provided, and do furthermore certify the following: 1. That those people who I expect to share occupancy of the Residence with me are listed under the Household Information section of the Application. 2. That my spouse is an Applicant for the Program and must sign this Application. 3. That I will submit true and complete copies of all requested documentation. 4. That the Residence will be occupied and used as my principal place of residence. 5. That my income does not exceed the program income limits. AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT CERTIFICATION I acknowledge and understand that this Affidavit, as completed above, will be relied on for determining my eligibility for An Affordable Housing Unit. I acknowledge that a material misstatement negligently made by me in this Affidavit or in any other connection with my Application for an Affordable Housing Unit will constitute a violation punishable by a fine and possible criminal penalties imposed by law, and will result in the cancellation or revocation of the Loan. I acknowledge that any false statement or misrepresentation or the fraudulent use of any instrument, facility, article, or other valuable thing or service pursuant to my participation in the Program is punishable by fine. RENTER DATE RENTER DATE Exhibit __-9 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 715 of 1481 26 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 716 of 1481 27 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 717 of 1481 28 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 718 of 1481 29 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 719 of 1481 3 The sales price of any unit being sold in partial satisfaction of Developer’s obligation to provide moderate income housing shall not exceed the affordable housing costs for owner occupied housing as defined within the Affordable Housing Program for the master plan community. 30 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 720 of 1481 31 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 721 of 1481 32 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 722 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 723 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 724 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 725 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 726 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 727 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 728 of 1481 Introduction The City of Chula Vista seeks to improve the quality of life of its residents by implementing Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, as well as and incorporatingTDM measures in the development review process. TDMrefers to programs and strategies that manage and reduce traffic congestion by encouraging the use of transportation alternatives. Some of theTMD goalsare: Encourage multi-modal transportation options that reduce carbon emissions Reduce roadway congestion, including freight, especially during peak periods Support implementation of the TDM goals in the General Plan Capitalize on the TDM programs offered by SANDAG Reduce reasons for residents to travel outside Chula Vista for work and recreation Avoid being overly burdensome and costly –particularly for businesses Create a program that is far-reaching, but also able to adapt to the unique communities within the city Ensure program viability through a creative approach to funding General Plan TDM strategies are incorporated into Land Use and Transportation Element of the General Plan. Objective -LUT 18:Reduce traffic demand through Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, increased use of transit, bicycles, walking, and other trip reduction measures. Policies: LUT 18.1 Support and encourage the use of public transit. LUT 18.2 Provide an efficient and effective paratransit service for elderly and handicapped persons unable to use conventional transit service. LUT 18.3 Provide and enhance all feasible alternatives to the automobile, such as bicycling and walking, and encourage public transit ridership on existing and future transitroutes. LUT 18.4 Use master planning techniques in new development and redevelopment projects to enable effective use of public transit. LUT 18.5 Implement TDM strategies, such as carpooling, vanpooling, and flexible work hours that encourage alternatives to driving alone during peak periods. 1 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 729 of 1481 LUT 18.6 Encourage employer-based TDM strategies, such as: employee transportation allowances; preferential parking for rideshare vehicles; workplace-based carpoolprograms; and shuttle services. LUT 18.7 Support the location of private “telework” centers. LUT 18.8 Encourage establishment of park-and-ride facilities near or at transit stations, as appropriate to the area's character and surrounding land uses. LUT 18.9 Adopt roadway design guidelines that enhance street connectivity for pedestrians. FC-2 project is designed as a sustainable and pedestrian-friendly community. The following section outlines how the project meets the TDM objectives. Implementation of TDM in FC-2 FC-2 employs a group of TDM strategies that incentivize and enable walking, biking and transit, versus driving. As a pedestrian-and transit-oriented development, FC-2 contains complete streets and walkable activity centers (Public Park, neighborhood retail and restaurants along Town Center Drive). Refer to Figure 1. Mixed uses and high density result in a more compact development which makes walking a feasible alternative to driving. Itcreates an active urban community that is bike-and pedestrian-friendly and offers diverse amenitiesin its own neighborhood. The project provides a connection to an existing bicycle trail along Olympic parkway, connecting it to a city-wide network. FC-2 encourages alternatives to driving by providing services, shopping and entertainment opportunities within walking distance of the high-density residential, which promotes walking and biking instead and alleviates traffic congestion. Otay Ranch Town Center Mallis in direct adjacency to the residential and hotel uses in FC-2and can be reached by walking. FC-2is also proximate to Otay Ranch Village 6,which includes neighborhood serving uses such asparks and schools. Additionally, with the construction of the BRT bridge, a pedestrian connection will exist shortening the walk to these uses to less than a 1/4 mile. Pedestrian sidewalks and pathways connect residential, hotel, and commercial uses to each other and the Town Center Park, creatinga pedestrian friendly environment and encourage residents to walk(see Figure 2). FC-2 provides pedestrian access to mass transit. FC-2 is located within blocks of a regular bus route. Additionally, a ROW is dedicated for the new BRT route alignment along thesouthern project boundary. A future park-and ride facility is reserved in FC-1. 2 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 730 of 1481 FC-2 contains cycling infrastructure (designated bike lanes, multi-use paths, bike racks), the goal of which is toenhance riders’ experience by providing a safe route and encourage the use of this alternative to driving Pedestrian connections throughout the project -interior courtyards, paseos, promenades, and plazas –make the project site moreaccessibleandprovide better customer access to businesses located on Town Center Drive Project design will incorporate enhanced bike amenities such as secure and convenient bike parking, locker rooms, and bikerepair stands near multi-family, employment, and recreation areas to augment investments in active transpo1iation infrastructure within the community. Project design will incorporate dedicated parking for carpools/vanpools at the hotel employment sites. Residential Homeowners Association, Apartment Management Office, and Business Association will perform TDM outreach and education plans that include a customized personalized travel planning (PTP) program. PTP is SANDAG’s community-based approach to transportation outreach and a proven method for encouraging sustained travel behavior change. PTP provides people with customized information and incentives that help them to try transportation alternatives that meet their personal travel needs. This strategy canhelp meet the travel needs of residents and employees who may carpool, vanpool, or take transit to and from Freeway Commercial 2. 3 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 731 of 1481 Figure 1. Site Plan Concept. 4 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 732 of 1481 Figure 2.Pedestrian/Bicycle Circulation. 5 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 733 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 734 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 735 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 736 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 737 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 738 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 739 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 740 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 741 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 742 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 743 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 744 of 1481 Page 745 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 746 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 747 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 748 of 1481 ii 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 749 of 1481 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary.........................................................................................................1 A. Intent of AQIP.................................................................................................................1 B. Community Site Design Goals.......................................................................................1 C. Planning Features..........................................................................................................2 2.Introduction......................................................................................................................4 A. Need for AQIP................................................................................................................4 B. AQIP as Tool for Implementation of Ordinances............................................................4 2a.Purpose & Goals............................................................................................................5 A. Purpose of AQIP............................................................................................................5 B. RegulatoryFramework Related to Air Quality................................................................5 Figure 1: Ambient Air Quality Standards Matrix............................................................6 Figure 2: APC Air Quality Emissions Budget.................................................................7 3.Project Description.........................................................................................................11 Figure 3: SPA Land UsePlan.......................................................................................12 Figure 4: Site Plan Illustration.......................................................................................13 4.Effect of Project on Local/Regional air Quality...............................................................14 Figure 5:Project Operational Emissions......................................................................15 5.Quantitative Project Design Evaluation..........................................................................17 Table ES1:LEED-ND v2009 Equivalency Scorecard..................................................18 Table ES2: Cross-Walk to Corresponding INDEX Indicators .......................................20 6.Community Design and Site Planning Features.............................................................21 Figure 6: Community Design and Site Plan Features.................................................21 7.Chula Vista COReduction Plan....................................................................................23 2 Figure 7: Consistency with COReductionAction Measures.......................................25 2 8.Credit Towards Increase Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards...................................28 9. Compliance Monitoring..................................................................................................29 Figure 8: Air Quality Improvement Plan Compliance Checklist..........................................29 iii 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 750 of 1481 iv 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 751 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 1.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A.Intent of AQIP This Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP) has been prepared in conjunction with the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan amendment, required for the proposed development of Freeway Commercial North (FC-2)site as a mixed-use project. The Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA plan covers both Freeway Commercial South site, which was developed as Otay Ranch Town Center mall in 2006, and Freeway Commercial North site. The two parcelscorrespond to two major ownerships of the property. Because of the independent ownerships, project plans have been designed and structured to allow the two parcels develop separately but in a coordinated manner. The purpose of the AQIP is to provide an analysis of air pollution impacts that would result from the proposed development in FC-2and to demonstrate how the sitedesignreduces vehicle trips, maintainsor improves traffic flow, reduces vehicle miles traveled, and reduces direct or indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This AQIP also demonstrates howFC-2has been designed consistent with the City’s Green Building Standards, (CVMC 15.26) and Energy Code (15.12) and represents the best available design in terms of improving energy efficiency and reducing GHG emissions. GHG emissions include gases such as Carbon Dioxide (CO), Methane (CH), and Nitrous Dioxide (N0). They occur both naturally, and are 242 produced by human activities, such as by automobile emissions and emissions from production of electricity to provide power to homes and businesses. These gases prevent heat from escaping the earth’s atmosphere, while allowing in sunlight, which has the affect of warming the air temperature. Applicable action measures contained in the City’s Carbon Dioxide (CO) Reduction Plan are also addressed. 2 B.Community Site Design Goals Otay Ranch is a 23,000-acre master-planned community and includes a mix of land useswithin 20 villages and/or planning areas. FC-2 is a mixed use site proposed to be developed with two commercial hotels,up to 900 multi-family residential units,15,000 sq. ft. mixed use commercial retail,and a 2-acre public park. The project islocated south of Olympic Parkway and eastof SR-125. The proposed project establishes a unified walkable mixed-use plan for the FC-2 site. It is intended to enhance living, working, shopping, and transit options in the area. It creates a walkable neighborhood that offers urban-style, smaller-scale living accommodations within walking distance to the already established local shops, services, schools, entertainment and dining, as well as a regional system of trails and open spaces. The vision forthiscommunityisto develop a cohesive neighborhoodwith inter-connected uses and densities. The mix of proposed residential, commercial, and community uses isintended to provide a mixed-use environment that serves the needs of residents and employees. The increased density and housing choices will provide additional ridership opportunities forthe regional Bus Rapid Transitand local bus system increasing the viability of transit and reducing automobile dependence.The densities and design patterns envisioned for FC-2focus on promoting a walkable and bikeable community with less emphasis on automobile trips. 1 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 752 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North C.Planning Features FC-2projectincludes the following planning features to achieve the community sitedesign goals: Land Use features: 1)Integrated Circulation System. Project residents and visitors are afforded non-automobile related circulation options that include walking, bicycling, and transit. Town Center Drive–the main roadway with ground-floor mixed use commercial –as well as interior streets –are designed to provide a comfortable walking environment. 2)Mixed Uses.A 36-acre project houses a mix of residences, shops, restaurants, a park, and hotels. This type of development makes it easy for residents, visitors and employees to walk or bike to destinations, helping to efficiently connect the city’s neighborhoods through sustainable mobility. 3)Residential Density.The high-density multi-family project is intended to promotewalking and biking as afeasible alternative to drivingdue to reduced distances andthe resulting close proximity of various services and destinations. 4)Street Widths, Pavement and Street Trees.Otay Ranch street sections are narrower than typical standards which reduces asphaltpavement and the "urban heat-island effect" by limiting the amount of reflectivesurfaces. Street trees provide shade which further reduces heat-gain.Widened landscape medians and parkways to reduce paving, thereby reducing heat gain and the demand for air conditioning. Street trees within the parkways and mediansprovide shade to further reduce ambient air temperatures. 5)Public Transportation.The design plan for the development is transit ready. In conformance with General Plan policy, public transportation is an integral part of Otay Ranch. Public transit lines and stops are integrated into the plan and are adjacent to the project. This is intended to help reduce the dependence on the passenger vehicle and encourage walking, biking, and transit trips. Bus Rapid Transitservice is planned along the southern boundary of the site. In addition, Local Bus routes 709, 707, and 635 servethe project, with an additional new bus stop proposed near the hotels. 6)Alternative Travel Modes.FC-2 site will be connected to the regional trail network and will feature sharrow lanes through the project.Sidewalks will be provided throughout the project site. All internal roadways are designed to local street standards with speed limits of 25 to 30 mph. Slow traffic speeds are conducive to both walking and bicycling and provide the necessary linkage to the regional bicycle circulation network. Building and Design Element Features: 1)Use of low-VOC paints as required under SDAPCD Rule 67. 2)Project-wide recycling as required under the County's recycling Ordinance. 3)Energy efficiency as required under the 2016California Energy Code and CalGreen. 4)Indoor residential appliances that carry the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) ENERGYSTAR® certification, as applicable and feasible. 5)Inclusion of all residential units in the local utility demand response program to limit peak energy usage for cooling. 6)Indoor residential plumbing products that carry the EPA's WaterSense certification. 7)Passive solar design and building orientation principles to take advantage of the sun in the winter for heating and reduce heat gain and cooling needs during summer. 8)Energy efficient lighting for streets, parks, and other public spaces as well as for private development projects. 2 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 753 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 9)Installation of only electric or natural gas fireplaces in new development. No wood burning fireplaces are permitted. 10)Installation of solar water heater preplumbing. 11)Installation of solar photovoltaic prewiring. 12)Installation of residential graywater stub-out. Landscape Features: 1)Watering three times daily to control fugitive dust to meet the requirements SDAPCD. 2)High-efficiency irrigation equipment, such as evapotranspiration controllers, soil moisture controllers and drip emitters for all projects that install irrigation water meters, per the City of Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 20, Section 12. 3)Water efficient vegetation, including native species, planted in public and private landscape areas. 4)Natural turf in residential development limited to no more than 30% of the outdoor open space. 5)Vertical landscape elements, such as trees, large shrubs, and climbing vines, shall be installed in order to shade southern and western building facades to reduce energy needs for heating and cooling. 6)Compliance with the City's Shade Tree Policy for parking lot design to achieve 50% shade cover in five to fifteen years through tree canopies, shade structures, or light colored "cool" paving. D.Modeled Effectiveness of Community Design With implementation of the proposed site design features, the project is consistent with the City of Chula Vista INDEX CO2 model requirements, as shown in Tables ES1 and ES2which describe the LEED-ND equivalency analysis (LEA) prepared for the project. 3 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 754 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 2.INTRODUCTION A.Need for anAQIP The objective of thisAQIP is to fulfill the City of Chula Vista’s Growth Management policy to improve air quality from existing conditions.As the result of rapid development not keeping pace with the demand for facilities and improvements, the City Council adopted Growth Management policy measures that would prohibit new development to occur unless adequate public facilities, improvements and environmental quality of life standards were put in place. The purpose of City of Chula Vista’s Growth Management ordinance (CVMC Chapter 19.09) is to provide the following: 1.Provide quality housing opportunities for all economic sections of the community; 2.Provide a balanced community with adequate commercial, industrial, recreational and open space areas to support the residential areas of the City; 3.Provide that public facilities, services and improvements meeting City standards exist or become available concurrent with the need created by new development; 4.Balance the housing needs of the region against the public service needs of Chula Vista residents and available fiscal and environmental resources; 5.Provide that all development is consistent with the Chula Vista general plan; 6.Prevent growth unless adequate public facilities and improvements are provided in a phased and logical fashion as required by the general plan; 7.Control the timing and location of development by tying the pace of development to the provision of public facilities and improvements to conform to the City’s threshold standards and to meet the goals and objectives of the growth management program; 8.Provide that the air quality of the City of Chula Vista improves from existing conditions; 9.Provide that the City of Chula Vista conserves water so that an adequate supply be maintained to serve the needs of current and future residents. This AQIP is provided in accordance with CVMC 19.09.050B. The Growth Management Ordinance requires that no application for a SPA Plan or Tentative Map shall be deemed complete or accepted for review unless an AQIP is provided and approved as part ofthe approval of the SPA Plan or Tentative Map by the City. B.AQIP as Tool for Implementation of Ordinances ThisAQIP has been prepared based on the best available design practices and also serves to implement several of the key aspects of the City’s COReduction Plan, the Green Building Standards (CVMC Chapter 2 15.26) and the City's Energy Code (CVMC 15.12). 4 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 755 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 2a.PURPOSE & GOALS A.Purpose of AQIP The purpose of the AQIP is to provide an analysis of air pollution impacts that would result from development of theFC-2 siteand to demonstrate how the projectdesign reduces vehicle trips, maintains or improves traffic flow, reduces vehicle miles traveled, and reduces direct or indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This AQIP also demonstrates how the projecthas been designed consistent with the City’s Green Building Standards, (CVMC 15.26) and Energy Code (15.12) and represents the best available design in terms of improving energy efficiency and reducing GHG emissions. GHG emissions include gases such as Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), and Nitrous Dioxide (N20). They occur both naturally, and are produced by human activities, such as by automobile emissions and emissions from production of electricity to provide power to homes and businesses. These gasesprevent heat from escaping the earth’s atmosphere, while allowing in sunlight, which has the effect of warming the air temperature. Applicable action measures contained in the City’s Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Reduction Plan are also addressed. B.Regulatory FrameworkRelated to Air Quality There are a number of actions that Federal, State and Local jurisdictions have taken to improve air quality, increase energy efficiency, and reduce GHG emissions. This section summarizes those actions. Air quality is defined by ambient air concentrations of specific pollutants determined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to be of concern with respect to the health and welfare of the public. The subject pollutants monitored by the EPA include the following: Carbon Monoxide (CO), Sulfur Dioxide (SO), 2 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO), 2 Nitrogen Oxides (NO) x Ozone (O), 3 Respirable 10-and 2.5-micron particulate matter (PMand PM), 102.5 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Reactive Organic Gasses (ROG), Hydrogen Sulfide (HS), 2 Sulfates, Lead (Pb), Vinyl Chloride, and Visibility reducing particles (VRP). The EPA has established ambient air quality standards for these pollutants. These standards are called the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The California Air Resources Board (CARB) subsequently established the more stringent California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). Both sets of standards are shown in Figure 1on the following page. Areas in California where ambient air concentrations of pollutants are higher than the state standard are considered to be in “non-attainment” status for that pollutant. Regulation of air emissions from non-mobile sources within San Diego County has been delegated to the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (APCD). Aspart of its air quality permitting process, the APCD has established thresholds for the preparation of Air Quality Impact Assessments (AQIAs) and/or Air 5 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 756 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Quality Conformity Assessments (AQCAs). APCD has also established an “emissions budget” or Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) for the San Diego Air Basin. This budget takes into account existing conditions, planned growth based on General Plans for cities within the region, and air quality control measures implemented by the APCD. Figure 1: Ambient Air Quality Standards Matrix 6 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 757 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North According to a report by the California Air Pollution Control Officers' Association (CAPCOA), 2013 was the cleanest year on record for the APCD. Accordingly, in 2013, the U.S. EPA redesignated the APCD as an attainment area for the 1997 8-hour federal ozone standard. The APCD has also been designated as a marginal non-attainment area for the more health-protective 2008 8-hour federal ozone standard, and monitoring datashow continued progress toward achieving this standard (marginal non-attainment requires attainment by the year 2015). The APCD also continues to meet all air quality standards for PM2.5, including the tightened annual standard that the U.S. EPA promulgated in early 2013, which brings the federal standard in line with the state standard. Figure 2shows the APCD air quality emissions budget. Figure 2:APCDAir Quality Emissions Budget 7 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 758 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Summary of Energy Efficiency Standards Title 24, Part 6 of the California Building Standards Code regulates energy useincluding space heating and cooling, hot water heating, and ventilation. The energy code allows new buildings to meet a “performance” standard that allows a builder to choose the most cost effective energy saving measures to meet the standard from a variety of measures. These choices may include the following: Added insulation, Improved windows, Radiant barriers, Cool roofs, Improved HVAC systems, Alternative heating and cooling systems, More efficient water heating systems, and More efficient lighting systems. The California Energy Commission's (CEC) 2013 Building Energy EfficiencyStandards are 25% more efficientthan previous standards for residential construction and 30% better for nonresidential construction. Thesestandards took effect on July 1, 2014. On average, the standards increase the cost of constructing a new home by $2,290 butwill return more than $6,200 in energy savings over 20 years. These new energy efficiency standards are designed toward the"Zero Net Energy" (ZNE)goalfor new homes by 2020 and commercial buildings by 2030. The ZNE goal means that new buildings must use a combination of improved efficiency and distributedrenewable generation to meet 100 percent of the annual energy need. The City's Energy and Water Conservation Regulations (CVMC 20.04) require that all new residential units include the necessary plumbing to encourage the later installation of solar hot water heating. In addition, the electrical conduit necessary for installation of solar photovoltaicsystem is also requiredfor all new residential units. Water-related energy use consumes 19 percent of California’s electricity, 30 percent of its natural gas, and 88 billion gallons of diesel fuel every year. The water-related energy use includes water and wastewater treatment as well as the energy needed to transport the water from it source (either northern California or the Colorado River). California Green Building Code Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen) requires that indoor water use be reduced through stringentnewwaterfixture flow rates. The City has also reduced the demand for outdoor water use through the adoption of the Landscape Water Conservation requirements (CVMC 20.12).The City of Chula Vista recently adopted a residential graywater sub-out requirement to allow the future installation of a clothes washer graywater irrigation system (CVMC 15.28.020). CALGreen also requires that a minimum of 50% all new construction waste generated at the site be diverted to recycle or salvage. Additionally, the State has set per capita disposal rates of 5.3 pounds per person per day for the City of Chula Vista. The City requires new construction to divert 100% of the inert waste and not less than 50% of the remaining waste generated during construction (CVMC 8.25.020). 8 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 759 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Summary of Greenhouse Gas (GHG)Reduction Greenhouse gasses (GHGs) include carbon dioxide (CO), methane (CH) and nitrous oxide (N0). These 242 gases allow solar radiation (sunlight)into the Earth's atmosphere but prevent radiative heat from escaping, thus warmingthe earth's atmosphere. GHGs are emitted by both natural processes and human activities. As directed by Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the Climate Change Scoping Plan (December 2008 prepared by CARB) includes measures to reduce statewide GHGsto 1990 levels by 2020 from forecasted business-as- usual (BAU) 2020 emissions. Recent guidance in the draft AB32 2017 Scoping Plan has identified a local government per capita GHG emission goal of 6 MT COe by 2030 and 2 MT COe by 2050. The majority of the reduction strategies are to come from the two sectors that generate the most CO 2 emissions statewide: transportation and electricity generation. The majority of the reduction in transportation-related and energy-related COemissions are to be achieved through statewide regulatory 2 mandates affecting vehicle emissions and types of fuel the vehicles use, public transit, and public utilities. The remaining reductions are to be achieved through direct regulation and price incentive measures affecting oil and gas extraction industries and forestry practices (including increased tree planting programs). BAU is defined as the emissions that would have occurred in the absence of reductions mandated under AB 32, including CHG reductions from the following: Implementation of Pavley 1 and Pavley 2 motor vehicle standards. Pavley regulations establish specific GHG emissions levels for both passenger cars and light-duty trucks. The standards become more stringent each year through 2016. Implementation of the Low Carbon Fuel Standard(LCFS). CARB has also adopted aLCFSthat setscarbon reduction standards for the types of fuels that can be sold in California, particularly renewable fuels. This will reduce the GHG emissions even if total fuel consumption is not reduced. Implementation of the Renewable Portfolio Standard(RPS). RPS requires investor-owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase renewable energy resources to 33% by 2020. Increased energy efficiency measures codified in Title 24 as of 2016. BAU uses the energy efficiency standards codified in Title 24 as of 2005. Implementation of Federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)standards. The CAFEstandards determinethe fuel efficiency of certain vehicle classes. The three most applicable measures to land use planning and development within the City of Chula Vista’s control include the Regional Transportation-related GHG targets, support for the Million Solar Roofs program, and energy efficiency measures. Since the early 1990s, the City has been engaged in multiple climate change forums including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Cities for Climate Protection campaign and theU.S. Conference of Mayor’s Climate Protection Agreement. The key plans and ordinances that the City has adopted and implemented to achieve citywide GHG emissions reductions are summarized below. Each participant in the International Council of Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) was to create local policy measures to ensure multiple benefits in the City and at the same time identify a carbon reduction goal through the implementation of those measures. In its COReduction Plan developed in 1995 and officially 2 adopted in 2000, Chula Vista committed to lowering its COemissions by diversifying its transportation 2 9 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 760 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North system and using energy more efficiently in all sectors. To focus efforts in this direction, the City adopted the COreduction goal of 20% below 1990 levels by 2010. In order to achieve this goal, specific actions 2 were identified,which when fully implemented, were anticipated to save 100,000 tons of COeach year. 2 The 2008 GHG Emissions Inventory noted that compared to 1990, Chula Vista’s citywide GHG emissions have increased by 29%, however, per capita and per housing unit levels are approximately 25% and 17% below 1990 levels, respectively. The Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) helped develop recommendations to reduce the community’s GHGs in order to meet the City’s 2010 GHG emissions reduction targets.The CCWG ultimately chose seven measures that were adopted by the City Council and the horizon date was delayed until 2012 instead of 2010. During 2014, a CCWG reconvened to help update the City's Climate Action Plan. Specifically, the CCWG developedrecommendations, through an open and transparent public process, for new greenhouse gas reduction strategies to assist Chula Vista in reaching its carbon reduction goals. The most recent plan is the 2017 Climate Action Plan (CAP) which was adopted by City Council on September 26, 2017.New guidance, including the 2017 draft AB 32 Scoping Plan Update, lists a local government per capita, or person, reduction goal of 6 MT CO2e by 2030 and 2MT CO2e by 2050. 10 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 761 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION The FC-2 site is entitled for the construction of 600 multi-family residential units, 15,000 square-feet of commercial space in a mixed-use format, and 2.0 acres of public parkland, as shown on Figures3 and 4. A SPA Plan Amendment is required to add 300 multi-family units to the existing entitlement. The mixed-use residential would be located along Town Center Drive and would consist of ground floor commercial with residential above (approximately 600units) on approximately 10.4 acres, resulting in a density of 58.5dwelling units per acre. These residential units would be comprised of studio units, and one- and two-bedroom units. The residential land uses within the western portion of the site would be comprised of approximately 290 multi-family units at the density of approximately18dwelling units per acre. The land uses for the western residential area would include a variety of building heights to enhance the visual appearance and to avoid adverse bulk and massing. Shared one-way streets for pedestrian, vehicular, and bicycle use, would be included in the circulation plan for this area. The park is located near the center of the site and would be available for use by residents, retail employees, hotel guests, and visitors. The design of the park would incorporate flexibility for events for all potential users (hotel, residents, the City, etc.). The park would include an open lawn area, shaded picnic grove area, a water feature, food truck parking and plaza, a location for outdoor screening of movies, amphitheater seating, a boulder field, and hillsides. Town Center Drive generally bisects the site in a north to south direction. The design of Town Center Drive would promote a walkable, safe, and visually appealing roadway. The roadway would have a narrower street to encourage slower travel and multimodal travel, angled parking, a landscaped median, landscaped buffers along the edges, and wide pedestrian sidewalks. 11 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 762 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Figure 3:SPA Land Use Plan 12 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 763 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Figure 4: Site Plan Illustration 13 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 764 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 4.EFFECT OF PROJECT ON LOCAL/REGIONAL AIR QUALITY This section includes a generalized discussion of theshort-term and long-term effects on local and regional air quality including its contribution to global climate change. The project site is currently served by threeMetropolitan Transit Service (MTS) Routes. The project is also anticipating future BRT servicealong the future extension of East Palomar Street adjacent to the southern boundary of the project site. Construction Related Emissions Air pollutant emission sources during project construction include exhaust and particulate emissions generated from construction equipment; fugitive dust from site preparation, grading, and excavation activities; and volatile compounds that evaporate during site paving and painting of structures.Because of their temporary nature, construction activity impacts have often been considered as having a less-than- significant air quality impact. However, the cumulative impact from all simultaneous construction in the basin is a contributor to the overall pollution burden. Construction emissions as estimated in the air quality technical report would be below all significance thresholds for criteria air pollutants, and would not exceed those levels identified in the project FEIR. The site would be watered at least three times daily to control fugitive dust emissions, and vehicle speeds would not exceed 15 miles per hour, per FEIR mitigation measure 5.4-2. In addition, low-VOC paints would be utilized duringarchitectural coatings. With incorporation of these design features, construction emissions were estimated to be below construction emissions estimated in the FEIR. The FEIR also identified mitigation measures 5.4-1 and 5.4-2, which reflect dust control measures and measures to reduce VOC and NOx emissions. This development is subject to SDAPCD Rule 55 -Fugitive Dust Control that requires restrictions of visible emissions of fugitive dust beyond the property line. Construction fugitive dust will be reduced by implementingthe followingdust control measures: Watering active grading sites and unpaved roads three times daily to control fugitive dust to meet the requirements of SDAPCD Rule 55. Use of low-VOC as required under SPAPCD Rule 67.0. Replacement ofground cover as quickly as possible. Reducing speeds on unpaved roads to 15miles per hour or less. Reduce dust during loading and unloading operations. According to the Air Quality Reportupdate memorandum, maximum daily emissions of all criteria pollutants would be below the significance thresholds for all criteria pollutantsexcept NOx. 14 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 765 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Operational Related Emissions Operational impacts associated with the FC-2 project would include impacts associated with vehicular traffic, as well as area sources such as energy use, consumer products use, and architectural coatings use for maintenance purposes. Emissions associated with project operations were estimated in the Air Quality Report using the CalEEMod Model. With reductions for a mix of uses and accessto transit (15%), the net project trip generation would be 7,681ADT. Figure 5 provides a summary of the estimated operational emissions for the project. Figure 5: FC-2 Project Operational Emissions Table 3 Criteria Pollutant Emissions from Proposed Project (lbs/day) From CalEEMod Model, Version 2016.3.1 VOCNOxCOSO2PM10PM2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions53.2185.56277.420.6948.7814.60 SCAQMD Significance 555555015015055 Threshold, lbs/day Above Threshold?NoYesNoNoNoNo As shown inabove table, operational emissions associated with the project would be below the significance criteria for operations for all criteria pollutants except NOx. NOxemissions are associated vehicles. NOx is produced from the reaction of nitrogen and oxygen gases in the air during combustion, especially at high temperatures. With future years, vehicle emissions would decrease due to phase-out of older, more polluting vehicles, and would be below the significance threshold of 55 lbs/day by the year 2025.NOx emissions would exceed the significance threshold for a temporary period, but would eventually be reduced below the City’s significance thresholds. Emissions are well below the levels reported in the 2002 EIR (314.55lbs/day), and therefore no new air quality impact is identified. No additional mitigation measures are proposed.All applicable measures have already been incorporated into the SPA plan, such as provision of bike lanes, providing services near residences, and providing transit support facilities such as bus stops. There are no other feasible mitigation measures available at the project level to reduce vehicular emissions other than reducing vehicle trips. The project trip generation rates account for areduction in vehicle trips that would occur as a result of the mixed-use areas and proximity totransit use proposed as part of the SPA plan. In addition, future vehicular emissions may be lower than estimated due to increasingly stringent California fuel efficiency requirements. Some measures cannot be implemented at the SPA level, such as providing video-conference facilities in work places or requiring flexible work schedules. Additionally, there are no feasible mitigation measures currently available to reduce area sources of emissions without regulating the purchases of individual consumers. The project will provide a mixed-use development with access to transit. This purpose meets the goals of the Regional Air Quality Strategy(RAQS)and the State Implementation Plan(SIP), which include measures to encourage transit use and mixed-use developments. As indicated in the Traffic Analysis (Chen 15 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 766 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Ryan 2017), the project would achieve a 15% reduction in vehicle trips by providing a mix of uses and access to transit. Accordingly, the project will meet the goals of the RAQS and SIP to reduce vehicle trips and therefore to improve air quality.The impacts associated with operations would be less than significant by the year 2025. Emissions are below the levels evaluated in the 2002 EIR, and no newair quality impacts are identified. No additional mitigation measures are required. Furthermore, the potential for health risks to residents of the project from surrounding land uses was evaluated in a screening health risk analysis. No adverse health risks would result from exposure to existing land uses. The project would therefore not result in a significant direct or cumulative impact on the ambient air quality. 16 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 767 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 5.QUANTITATIVE PROJECT DESIGN EVALUATION Criterion Planners Inc. has performed a quantitative analysis forFC-2 project using Option (2): Alternative Modeling Programs, specifically LEED-ND equivalency analysis (LEA). This analysis only pertains to the FC-2 site, and represents implementation of the 2004 full Freeway Commercial SPA AQIPwhich acknowledged that detailed FC-2 site planning had not yet occurred. With that planning now complete, sufficient data is available to support an LEA and fulfill the SPA AQIP requirements for FC-2. LEED-ND criteria are proposed as being more appropriate than INDEX indicators for FC-2 for four reasons: INDEX indicators and thresholds were originally developed using residential pilot projects in contrast to the mixed uses of FC-2. This difference was acknowledged in the2004 full SPA AQIP, Section II.7.3. INDEX indicators are primarily internal-focused, whereas FC-2 is an infill project whoseAQIP value derives in large part from surrounding uses that will interact with FC-2 uses.LEED-ND criteria measure these benefits to a greater and more accurate extent. The INDEX approach uses only 16 indicators, whereas LEED-ND has 56 indicators thatare able to characterize a project much more comprehensively and thoroughly, andultimately capture more contributors to GHG emission reductions. The underlying basics of the INDEX approach are nearly 15 years old, in contrast toLEED-ND’s latest update in 2014. Consequently, current best practices in urban design,green infrastructure, and resilient neighborhoods are not addressed by INDEXindicators, but are covered byLEED-ND criteria. Based on the amended FC-2 site development plan, the LEA finds that the amended FC-2 plan results in minor ND criteria changes (residential density, residential share of total floor area, diversity of residential units), but the changesare so small as to not alter the original SPA plan ND score of 56 points (see following amended scorecard table). Based on Criterion’s original development of the INDEX indicator thresholds for the City, and the firm’s experience certifying over 100 LEED-ND projects nationally, they have concludedthat a base ND certification of 40 points is the functional equivalent of the INDEX thresholds, and a score of 56 points therefore represents a notable exceedance of the thresholds, and clear AQIP compliance. Table ES2identifies the INDEX indicators which correspond to each of the LEED ND credits achieved by FC North. Each INDEX indicator has at least one corresponding ND credit, and on average each indicator has four corresponding ND credits. Where it matters the most for GHG emissions, auto driving and building energy, the ND coverage jumps to 10 and 8 credits, respectively. Overall, the ND approach is able to double or triple the depth and extent of measurements in relation to INDEX indicators. 17 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 768 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Otay Ranch FC-2 SPA Amendment -LEED-ND v2009 Equivalency Scorecard Amended FC LEED-ND v2009 OptionsNorth Prerequisites & Prerequisite Amended FC North Notes CreditsCompliance & Equivalency Points SLLp1Smart LocationTransit served50% of dwellings &business within 1/2-mile Yeswalk of 179 weekday transit trips and 46 weekend daily trips (inclusive of BRT) SLLc1Preferred 1. Location type3Infill site, not previously developed Locations 2. Connectivity1200 intersections/sq mi SLLc3Reduced Auto 1. Transit served3Weighted allocation of points based on 179 Dependenceweekday trips & 46 weekend daily trips (inclusive of BRT) SLLc4Bike NetworkBicycle network1Existing bicycle network of at least 5 miles within 1/4-mile bicycling distance of project boundary SLLc5Housing/Jobs 1. Affordable residential 71% residential share of total floor area, and Proximityinfill3geographic center of project within 1/2-mile walk distance of more than 900 jobs SLLc6Steep Slopes1. No slope over 15%1No substantive slopes over 15% SLLc7Habitat Site 1. No habitat1No significant habitat Design NPDp1Walkable 90% of public-space facing building Streetsfrontages with entries connected to sidewalks; 15% of street frontages with a Yesbuilding height to street width ratio of 1:3; 90% of streets with sidewalks on both sides; and less than 20% of street frontages devoted to garage or service bay openings NPDp2Compact YesResidential density of 33.7 DU/acre, and Developmentnon-residential density of 1.5 FAR (weighted between retail and hotels) NPDp3Connected & Internal connectivity of 200 intersections/sq OpenYesmi, and perimeter through-connections at least every 800 feet, except where physically-infeasible (Continued on next Page) 18 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 769 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Amended FC LEED-ND v2009Options North Prerequisites & CreditsPrerequisite Amended FC North Notes Compliance & Equivalency Points NPDc1Walkable Streetsa. 25 ft setback80% of street facing building façades no more than 25 feet from the propertyline d. Entries every 75 ftFunctional entries to buildings occur at an average of 75 feet or less f. Ground-level glass Ground-level retail/service spaces with facadesclear glass on 60% of façade 8 g. No blank wallsBlank walls along sidewalksof no more than 50 feet or 40% of façade length h. Unshuttered retail Ground-level retail/service spaces remain windowsun-shuttered at night i. On-street parkingOn-street parking allowed on internal streets j. SidewalksAll streets have sidewalks on both sides k. Ground floor dwellings Ground-floor dwellings at least 24 inches above gradeabove grade n. 20 mph residential 20 mph residential streets streets o. 25 mph non-re/mixed-25 mph non-residential/mixed-use streets use streets p. Driveways limitedDriveway widths are no more than 10% of total street length NPDc2Compact Compact development3Residential density of 33.7 DU/acre, and Developmentnon-residential density of 1.5 FAR (weighted between retail and hotels) NPDc3Mixed Use Mixed use centers4Over 19 diverse uses within 1/4-mile walk Centersof 50% of dwellings NPDc4Mixed 1. Diverse housing types2SDI of 0.67 Income 2. Affordable housing210% of units up to 60% of AMI 3. Mixed Income Diverse 1Options 1 and 2 bonus point Communities NPDc7Transit FacilitiesTransit stop facilities1Transit stop planning/ongoing coordination NPDc9Access to Civic Access to civic spaces190% of dwelling units within 1/4-mile walk Spacesdistance of civic space NPDc10Access to Active rec space 190% of dwelling units within 1/2-mile walk Recreationoutdoors/indoorsdistance of recreational facilities NPDc11Visitability & Univ 1. Residential units1100% of DU compliant Design NPDc12Community 1. Community outreach1Consultation with stakeholders throughout Outreach& communications Ongoing NPDc13Local Food1. Neighborhood gardens1Neighborhood garden planned 3. Farmers marketFarmers market at Town Center (Continued on next Page) 19 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 770 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Amended FC North LEED-ND v2009 Options Prerequisite Prerequisites & Compliance & Amended FC North Notes CreditsEquivalency Points NPDc14Tree-1. Tree-lined streets160% of streets with shade trees at Lined/Shaded least every 40 ft. Streets 2. shaded streets140% of sidewalks shaded NPDc15School ProximitySchool proximity62% residential share of total floor 1area, and 50% of dwelling units within 1/2-mile walk distance of elementary & high schools (with BRT crossing) GIBp1Certified Green Certified greenbuildingYesOne building assumed, consistent with Buildingregional certification rates GIBp2Minimum Minimum building energy YesCalifornia energy code exceeds Building Energy efficiencyLEED-ND 2009 minimum Efficiency GIBp3Minimum Minimum building water YesCalifornia plumbing code exceeds to Building Water efficiencyLEED-ND 2009 minimum Efficiency GIBp4Construction Construction pollution YesCalifornia pollution prevention code Pollution preventionexceeds LEED-ND 2009 Preventionminimum GIBc2Energy Efficient Energy efficient buildings1California energy code equates to BldgsLEED-ND 2009 one-point level of energy savings GIBc3Water Efficient Water efficient buildings1California plumbing code equates to BldgsLEED-ND 2009 one-point level of water savings GIBc4Water Efficient Water efficient landscaping1California water code exceeds LEED- LandscapingND 2009 minimum GIBc9Heat Island 3. Mix of roof & non-roof 1Mix of roof & non-roof measures on Reductionmeasures75% of qualifying areas GIB c13Infrastructure Energy efficient 115% efficiency gain assumed Energy Effinfrastructure IDPc1InnovationExemplary performance130+ diverse uses IDPc2InnovationExemplary performance1Outdoor irrigation efficiency IDPc3InnovationInnovation1Achievement of SLLc5 Option 3 -non- residential infill IDPc4InnovationInnovation1Environmentally-responsible landscape maintenance program assumed IDPc2LEED LEED AP on team1LEED AP assumed Accredited Professional RPc1Regional Regional priorities4Building water efficiency, walkable Prioritiesstreets, shaded streets, mixed use neighborhoods Total equivalent points56Total Corresponding LEED-ND Measurements Equivalent certification Silver level 20 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 771 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 6COMMUNITY DESIGN AND SITE PLANNING FEATURES This section describes the specific strategies that have been integrated intothe project to create a sustainable community, including those project attributes designed to reduce air quality impacts by promoting walking and alternative travel modes, reducing vehicle miles traveled, and improving energy conservation. Figure 6: Community Design and Site Plan Features includes the list of specific measures that have been included in theFC-2project. Figure 6:Community Design and Site Plan Features Transportation Related Measures An integrated circulation system provides residents withnon-automobile related circulation options that include walking, bicycling, and transit. The mix of proposed residential, commercial, and community uses provide a complementary, mixed-use environment with a focus on promoting a walkable and bikeable community that promotes pedestrian activityin and around theproject. Higher density uses support walking as distances are reduced, which results in lowerGHG emissions from vehicles. Direct pedestrian links, including the proposed pedestrian bridge over the SR-125,extend from the surrounding neighborhoods directly to theproject site. Bike lanes and bike racks will be provided through the project. Allinternalroadways are designed to local street standards with speed limits of 25 to 30 mph. Slow traffic speeds are conducive to walking and bicycling and provide the necessary linkage to the regional bicycle circulation network. LSVs may travel on all internalstreets with a maximum travel speed of 35 miles per hour. The current regional transit plan includes BRT transit lines the extension of East Palomar Streetalong the southern boundary of the project. A futurelocaltransit stop is planned at the southeast intersection of Olympic Parkway and Town Center Drive, closest to the hotels and mixed use commercial uses. Synchronization ofthe traffic lights is requiredas part of an individual development project with previously installed traffic lights in order to reducetraffic congestion. Energy Conservation Related Measures All of the residential units will be multi-family, whichuse less energy for heating and cooling when compared to single-family detached homes. California Green Building Code Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen) requires that a minimum of 50% all new construction waste generated at the site be diverted to recycle or salvage. Additionally, the State has set per capita disposal rates of 5.3 pounds per person per day for the City of Chula Vista. Reducing waste could reduce the amount of vehicle trips transporting materials to and from the site. CVMC 8.25.095requires all new construction and demolition projects to divert 100% of inert waste (asphalt, concrete, bricks, tile, trees, stumps, rocks and associated vegetation and soils resulting from land clearing from landfill disposal); and 50% of all remaining waste generated. Contractors will be required to put up a performance deposit and prepare a Waste Management Report form to ensure that all materials are responsibly handled. Upon verification that the diversion goals have been met the performance deposit will be refunded. Utilize solar heating technology as practical. Generally, solar panels can be cost-effectively used to heat water for domestic use andfor swimming pools. Advances in solar technology in the future may make other applications appropriate. Enhance energy efficiency in building designs and landscaping plans. Installation of solar water heater preplumbing. Installation of solar photovoltaic prewiring. 21 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 772 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Installation of residential graywater stub-out. Other Measures to Improve Air Quality Install only electric or naturalgas fireplaces in new development. No wood burning fireplaces are permitted. When siting sensitive land uses such as residences, schools, day care centers, playgrounds and medical facilities the recommendations set forth in Table 1-1 of California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) Land Use and Air Quality Handbook (CARB 2004) will be use as a guideline. Specifically, new sensitive uses would not be located within 50 feet of any typical-sized gas station (one that has a throughput of less than 3.6 million gallons per year). No gas stations with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater shall be developed within theproject. Compliance with the City's Shade Tree Policy for parking lot design to achieve 50% shade cover in five to fifteen years through tree canopies, shade structures, or light colored "cool" paving. 22 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 773 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 7.CHULA VISTA CLIMATE ACTIONPLAN This section provides a comparative evaluation between the community/site design features and the energy efficiency emission reduction action measures contained in the City’s Climate ActionPlan(CAP)which was adopted by City Council on September 26, 2017. The City of Chula Vista original COReduction Plan adopted in November 2000,was intended to reduce 2 GHGemissions by 20% below 1990 levels. The COReduction Plan outlined steps for Chula Vista to 2 reduce energy consumption, promote alternative transportation and design transit-friendly, walkable communities.The 2005GHG emissions inventoryindicated that Chula Vista’s annual citywide GHG levels had increased by 35% since 1990 due primarily to residential growth. During the same period, the City made significant progress in reducing annual per capita emissions by 17% and avoiding nearly 200,00 tons of GHG emissions annually. In addition, GHG emissions from municipal sources decreased by 18% mainly due to traffic signal energy-efficiency improvements. As a result of the 2005 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report, in 2008, the City Council directed the re-evaluated of the program and convened a Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) to develop recommendations to reduce the community’s greenhouse gas emissions or “carbon footprint” in order to meet the City’s 2010 greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. Duringthe 2014 CCWG sessions, the City established a new plan of actions to take it closer to achieving statewide goals of reducing GHG emissions to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 55% by 2030. These Implementation Measures include the following: I.WATER CONSERVATION & REUSE Objective 1.1 –Water Education & Enforcement Strategy 1. Expand education and enforcement targeting landscape water waste. Objective 1.2 –Water Efficiency Upgrades Strategy 1.Update the City’s landscaping regulations to promote more waterwise designs. Strategy 2.Require watersavings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time. Objective 1.3 –Water Reuse Plan & System Installations Strategy 1. Develop a Water Reuse Framework for storm water, graywater, and onsite waterreclamation. Strategy 2. Facilitate simple graywater systems for LaundrytoLandscape applications. Strategy 3. Streamline complex graywater systems permit review II.WASTE REDUCTION Objective 2.1 –Zero Waste Plan Strategy 1. Develop a Zero Waste Plan to supplement statewide green waste, recycling, and plastic bag ban efforts. III.RENEWABLE & EFFICIENT ENERGY Objective 3.1 –Energy Education & Enforcement Strategy 1. Expand education targeting key community segments and facilitate energy performance disclosure. Strategy 2. Leverage the building inspection process to deter unpermitted, lowperforming energy improvements. Objective 3.2 –Clean Energy Sources 23 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 774 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Strategy 1. Incorporate solar into all new buildings to help transition to Zero Net Energy design. Strategy 2. Provide more griddelivered clean energy (up to 100%) through Community Choice Aggregation or other mechanism. Objective 3.3 –Energy Efficiency Upgrades Strategy 1. Reauthorize the City’s “cool roof” standards and expand to include reroofs and western areas. Strategy 2. Facilitate more energy upgrades in the community through incentives, permit streamlining (where possible), and education. Strategy 3. Require energysavings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time. Objective 3.4 –Robust Urban Forests Strategy 4. Plant more shade trees to save energy, address heat island issues, and improve air quality. IV.SMART GROWTH & TRANSPORTATION Objective 4.1 –Complete Streets & Neighborhoods Strategy 1. Incorporate “Complete Streets” principles into municipal capital projects and plans. Strategy 2. Encouragehigher density and mixeduse development in Smart Growth areas, especially around trolley stations and other transit nodes. Objective 4.2 –Transportation Demand Management Strategy 1. Utilize bike facilities, transit access/passes, and other Transportation Demand Management and congestion management offerings. Strategy 2. Expand bikesharing, carsharing, and other “last mile”transportation options. Objective 4.3 –Alternative Fuel Vehicles Strategy 1. Support the installation of more local alternative fueling stations Strategy 2. Designate preferred parking for alternative fuel vehicles. Strategy 3. Design all new residential and commercial buildings to be “Electric Vehicle Ready.” Figure 7: Consistency with CAP Implementation Actions Describe how project Project/Community ImplementationActiondesign will Implement Design Features CAPActions Water Conservation & Reuse Project will conserve water Objective 1.2. Strategy 1. Update the City’s Project is consistent with the water-wise through selection of low landscaping regulations to promote more landscape requirements.water use plans and smart wise designs. water irrigation Renewable & Efficient Energy Compliance with CVMC 20.04.030 that requires solar water heater preplumbing in all new residential Objective 3.2 Strategy 1.Adopt prewiring Reduces energy units. and preplumbing standards for solarconsumption that reduces Compliance with CVMC 20.04.040 that GHG emissions. photovoltaic and solar hot water, respectively requires solar photovoltaic prewiringin all new residential units. 24 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 775 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North The land use plan includes widened Reduces energy Objective 3.4 Strategy 4. Plant more shade landscape medians and parkways to reduce consumption that reduces trees to save energy, address heat island paving. Shade-producing street trees will be GHG emissions. issues, and improve airquality.planted to reduce heat build-up and demand for air conditioning. Smart Growth & Transportation Reduces vehicle- The SPA provides a detailed miles traveled that in Circulation Network that links with the turn reduces the potential transit stops. The project is GHG emissions. within walking distanced of 3 MTS bus Promotes bicycling routes. that can reduce The mixed-use nature of the project vehicle-miles traveled encourages pedestrian and bicycle that in turn reduces travel as an alternative to the Objective 4.1. Strategy 1.Incorporate the GHG emissions. automobile. Streets are designed to “Complete Streets” principles into municipal accommodate bicycle travel. capital projects and plans. Building and site design anticipates and accommodates pedestrian and vehicle circulation to reduce traffic impacts on neighboring streets and jointly optimize pedestrians and vehicles. Buildings are oriented toward sidewalks. Bike parking is required for all uses. Project is located along BRT route, Reduces vehicle-miles traveled that in turn within walking distance to Park & Ride reduces the GHG BRT station. The residential uses in emissions. the project are Multi-Family high- density. The mixed-use nature of the project Objective 4.1. Strategy 2. Encourage higher encourages pedestrian and bicycle density and mixeduse development in Smart Growth areas, especially around trolley travel as an alternative to the stations and other transit nodes. automobile. Streets are designed to accommodate bicycle travel. Pedestrian pathways and trails accommodate pedestrian movement from the residential areas to schools, parks and commercial uses. Objective 4.1,Strategy 1. Utilize bike The project will accommodateelectric Reduces non-renewable facilities, transit access/passes, and other vehicle (EV) chargers, throughprograms energy consumption that Transportation DemandManagement and such as SDG&E’s Power Your Drive.reduces GHG emissions. congestion management offerings. Objective 4.3. Strategy 1. Support the Energy efficient light for streets, parks and Reduces energy installation of more local alternative fueling other public spaces is required. consumption that reduces stations.GHG emissions. 25 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 776 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 8.CREDIT TOWARDS INCREASED MINIMUM ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS Note: Detailed provisions related to the calculation and application of credits are currently under development and subject to subsequent review and approval of City Council. 26 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 777 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North 9.Compliance Monitoring This section includes a written description and a checklist (Figure 8) summarizing the project design features and mitigation measures that have been identified to reduce the development'seffects on air quality and improve energy efficiency. Figure 8: Air Quality Improvement Plan Compliance Checklist Project Consistency Method ofResponsible & Compliance Timing of Verification 12 VerificationParty 3 Documentation PLANNING AQIP ProjectDesign Features/Principles Precise Plan, Design Pedestrian oriented developmentPlan ReviewCity of Chula Vista Review Widened landscape medians and Precise Plan, Design Plan ReviewCity of Chula Vista parkways with street treesReview Precise Plan, Design Integratedcirculation systemPlan ReviewCity of Chula Vista Review SPA Plan, Precise Mix of uses Plan ReviewCity of Chula Vista Plan SPA Plan, Precise Higher density Plan ReviewCity of Chula Vista Plan Tentative Tract Class II Bicycle facilities Plan CheckFinal Map, City of Chula Vista Improvement Plans Opportunity for employee services Plan ReviewPrecise PlanCity of Chula Vista to be located near employers Tentative Tract Circulation pattern w/less than Plan ReviewFinal Map, City of Chula Vista 35mph Improvement Plans Available public transportationPlan ReviewPrecise PlanCity of Chula Vista Transit PlanTransit ReviewPer SANDAGSANDAG/MTS/City Compliance with the City's Shade Precise Plan, Plan ReviewCity of Chula Vista Tree Policyfor parking lotsConstruction Plans Air Quality Mitigation Measures Construction related emissions Permit ReviewGrading PermitCity of Chula Vista Siting of sensitive land usesPermit ReviewPrecise PlanCity of Chula Vista TAC Emission CompliancePermit ReviewBuilding PermitCity of Chula Vista (Continued on next Page) 27 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 778 of 1481 Air Quality Improvement Plan Freeway Commercial North Figure 8: Air Quality Improvement Plan Compliance Checklist (Continued) Project Consistency Timing of Responsible Method of & Compliance 12 VerificationParty Verification 3 Documentation BUILDING Green Building Standards Waste Construction or City of Chula New Construction Recycling PlanManagement demolition permitVista Report Review Tentative Tract ORSan Diego Project wide recyclingPlan Check Building PermitCounty Energy Efficiency Standards City of Chula Size of dwellings unitsPlan CheckBuilding Permit Vista Building Permit/ Compliance with2016California Energy City of Chula Plan CheckTitle 24 Energy CodeVista Report Installation of energy efficient City of Chula Plan CheckBuilding Permit appliancesVista Participation in a Utility Demand City of Chula Plan CheckBuilding Permit Response programVista Compliance with 2016CalGreen Indoor City of Chula Plan CheckPlumbing Permit Water Use requirementsVista Compliance with EPA's WaterSense City of Chula Plan CheckPlumbing Permit certificationVista Compliance with EPA's Energystar City of Chula certification for indoor residential Plan CheckPlumbing Permit Vista appliances City of Chula Efficient irrigation equipmentPlan CheckLandscape Plan Vista City of Chula Water efficient vegetationPlan CheckLandscape Plan Vista City of Chula Turf limited to 30% in residential areas Plan CheckLandscape Plan Vista Solar access -use passive solar design City of Chula Plan CheckBuilding Permit andbuilding orientation principlesVista Solar access -Use of vertical landscape City of Chula elements to reduce heating/cooling Plan CheckBuilding Permit Vista loads Energy efficient light of streets, parks City of Chula Plan CheckBuilding Permit and public spacesVista Installation of solar water heater City of Chula Plan CheckBuilding Permit Vista preplumbing Installation of solar photovoltaic City of Chula Plan CheckBuilding Permit Vista prewiring Installation of residential graywater City of Chula Plan CheckBuilding Permit Vista stub-out Notes: 1.Method of verification may include, but is not limited to, plan check, permit review, site inspection. 2.Identify the party responsible for ensuring compliance (City of Chula Vista, San Diego APCD, Other) 3.This column shall include all pertinent information necessary to confirm compliance including document type, date of completion, plan/permit number, special notes/comments, and contact information. 28 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 779 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 780 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 781 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 782 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 783 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 784 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 785 of 1481 1 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 786 of 1481 2 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 787 of 1481 3 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 788 of 1481 4 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 789 of 1481 5 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 790 of 1481 6 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 791 of 1481 1. 2. 3. 7 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 792 of 1481 8 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 793 of 1481 9 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 794 of 1481 10 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 795 of 1481 11 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 796 of 1481 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 12 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 797 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 798 of 1481 Page 799 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 800 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 801 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 802 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 803 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 804 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 805 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 806 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 807 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 808 of 1481 Page 809 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 810 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 811 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 812 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 813 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 814 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 815 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 816 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 817 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 818 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 819 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 820 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 821 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 822 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 823 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 824 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 825 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 826 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 827 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 828 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 829 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 830 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 831 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 832 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 833 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 834 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 835 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 836 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 837 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 838 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 839 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 840 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 841 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 842 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 843 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 844 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 845 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 846 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 847 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 848 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 849 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 850 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 851 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 852 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 853 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 854 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 855 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 856 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 857 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 858 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 859 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 860 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 861 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 862 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 863 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 864 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 865 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 866 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 867 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 868 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 869 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 870 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 871 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 872 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 873 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 874 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 875 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 876 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 877 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 878 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 879 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 880 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 881 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 882 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 883 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 884 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 885 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 886 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 887 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 888 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 889 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 890 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 891 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 892 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 893 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 894 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 895 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 896 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 897 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 898 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 899 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 900 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 901 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 902 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 903 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 904 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 905 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 906 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 907 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 908 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 909 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 910 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 911 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 912 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 913 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 914 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 915 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 916 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 917 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 918 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 919 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 920 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 921 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 922 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 923 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 924 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 925 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 926 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 927 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 928 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 929 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 930 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 931 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 932 of 1481 Page 933 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 934 of 1481 Page 935 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 936 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 937 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 938 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 939 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 940 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 941 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 942 of 1481 Page 943 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 944 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 945 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 946 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 947 of 1481 Page 948 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 949 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet . 5AID ' . 'AID 5 P TA OI B/ LAIL CAV OLB YNE :A 06ER S A .Q: F11U .T49N STI QB F .3 .TA : 2 B R / B2 A I.A 5D ' .IA 'D 5 I.A 'D 5 A. 5ID ' CBCB OPT. COOLER W/D OPT. COOLER OPT. COOLER W/D OPT. COOLER OPT. COOLER W/D OPT. COOLER CBCB OPT. COOLER W/D OPT. COOLER OPT. COOLER W/D OPT. COOLER OPT. COOLER W/D OPT. COOLER CBCB OPT. COOLER W/D OPT. COOLER OPT. COOLER W/D OPT. COOLER OPT. COOLER W/D OPT. COOLER CBCB BB CC BB CC BB CC BB CC CBCB 5' DIA.5' DIA. 5' DIA.5' DIA. CB B C B C B C B C CB 5' DIA. 5' DIA.5' DIA. CBCB FB2FB2FB2FB1FB1FB1FB1FB1 FB2FB2FB2 FB2FB2FB2 FB2FB2FB2FB1FB1FB1FB1FB1 FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2 FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2FB2 Page 973 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 993 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 PROJECT NAME:Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 PROJECT LOCATION:City of Chula Vista PROJECT APPLICANT:City of Chula Vista DATE:May 6, 2019 1INTRODUCTION The FinalEnvironmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway CommercialSectional Planning AreaPlan Planning Area 12(FEIR)(identified by the City of Chula Vistaas EIR 02- 04)contains a comprehensive disclosure and analysis of potential environmental effects associated with the implementation of the Sectional Planning Area (SPA)Planand Freeway Commercial (FC) site (referred to as “proposed project”or “SPA Plan”)in the City of Chula Vista(City)(City of Chula Vista 2003). The SPA Planwas developed torefine and implement the land use plans, goals and objectives of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) for the development of Planning Area (PA) 12. In May 2015, the City approved the General Plan and Otay Ranch GDP Amendments, as well as entitlements, for the proposed modifications through approval ofthe First Addendum; In September 2016, aSecond Addendum to the FEIRwas prepared for the SPA Plan Amendments and a Tentative Map that implements the General Plan and Otay Ranch GDP.The First and Second Addenda to the FEIR modified the project to allowfor the construction of 600 multi- family residential units, 15,000 square-feet of commercial space in a mixed use format,and 2.0 acres of public parkland.The FEIR, the First Addendum, and the Second Addendumare collectively referred to as the “FEIR.” This Addendum addresses proposed modificationsto add 300 dwelling units to thenortheastern portion of Planning Area 12,also referred to asFreeway Commercial North(FC-2).All 300 units would be added to the area east of Town Center Drive and the west portion of the FC-2site would remain unchanged withtheproposed modifications of this Addendum.This increase would result in a total of 900 dwelling units in the FC-2site. 2CEQA REQUIREMENTS Sections 15162 through 15164 of the CEQA guidelines discuss a lead agency’s responsibilities in handling new information that was not included in a project’s final environmental impact report (EIR). 11361 1May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 998 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines provides: a.When an EIR has been certified…for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agencydetermines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: 1.Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2.Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3.New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: A.The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the \[Final\] EIR; B.Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the \[Final\] EIR; C.Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or D.Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the \[Final\] EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. In the event that one of these conditions would require preparation of a subsequent EIR, but “only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the \[Final\] EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation,” the City could choose insteadto issue a supplement to the FEIR (CEQA Guidelines, § 15163, subd. (a)). 11361 2May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 999 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 In the alternative, where the changes or new information will result in no new impacts, or no more severe impacts than any that were disclosed in the FEIR for theproposed project,the City “shall prepare an addendum”pursuant to CEQA Guideline, § 15164.That section states that an addendum should include a “brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to § 15162,” and that the explanation needs to be supported by substantial evidence (CEQA Guidelines, § 15164, subd. (e).) The addendum need not be circulated for public review, but may simply be attached to the FEIR (Ibid.; CEQA Guideline, § 15164, subd. (c)). Thus, in the following inquiry the City considers under the standards articulated above whether each of thesechanged circumstances reveal or create previously undisclosed significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously disclosed impacts (CEQA Guidelines, §15162, 15163, 15164, subd. (a); 15088.5, subds. \[a\], \[b\]).As the following discussion demonstrates, it is appropriate for the City to prepare this Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway CommercialSectional Planning Area Plan Planning Area 12 project, pursuant to CEQA Guideline, § 15164. 3PROJECT LOCATION AND REGIONAL SETTING Otay Ranch lies within the East Planning Area of the City of Chula Vista. The East Planning Area is bordered by Interstate 805 (I-805) to the west, San Miguel Mountain and State Route 54 to the north, the Otay Reservoir and the Jamul foothills to the east, and the Otay River Valley to the south. The SPA Planis located in the northeastern portion of the Otay Valley Parcel of the 22,899- acre Otay Ranch GDP project area(Figures1and 2).The project site, which comprises the FC Northportion of PA 12 in the adopted Otay Ranch GDP, is located east of State Route 125, west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Olympic Parkway, and north of Birch Road. The project areais characterized by flat mesa tops and rolling hills including a sloping canyon located in the central portion of the project site, which heads west towards Poggi Canyon.Site elevation ranges from approximately 560 feet above mean sea level (amsl) to approximately 640 feet amsl. The site was previously used for agricultural uses and livestock grazing. The site contains a small system of dirt roads and cattle trails, as well as inactive agricultural fields and non-native grasslands. The projectsiteis surrounded by other Otay Ranch development areas including Village 6 to the west, Village 11 to the east, a portion of the existing Eastlake community to the north and northeast, Village 7 to the southwest, and the EUC to the southof Birch Road.Eastlake High School and a commercial area are located north of the project site and the Arco Olympic Training Center is located east of the project site, immediately adjacent to Otay Lake. The proposed modifications 11361 3May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1000 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 are located in the northern portion ofPA 12, which is identified as FC-2 in the FEIR.FC-1 is fully developed as the Otay Ranch Town Center. 4PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS This Addendum addresses the proposed SPA Plan Amendment and Freeway Commercial North Master Precise Plan for the northern portion of Freeway Commercial to allow for a density increase of 300 dwelling units.All 300 units would be added to the area east of Town Center Drive and the west portion of the FC-2site would remain unchanged with the proposed modifications of this Addendum, as shown on Figure 3. This increase would result in a total of 900 dwelling units in the FC-2site. The additional units would be designed as a mid-rise style building, consisting of residential units and ground-floor retail which would wrap around anabove-grade parking structure. This design feature would eliminate the need for large areasof surface parking lotsand allow for an enhanced pedestrian-oriented design.It would also provide accessible parking for occupants as the residential units and ground-floor retail space wouldsurround the parking structure. With this density increase proposed by this Addendum, the proposed modifications would also increase the maximum buildingheightto84feetand 8 inchesabove-grade. With the addition of 300 dwelling units, the project’s overall residential density would be 33.7 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), which is consistent with the City’s General Plan.Residential densities would range from the lowest of 13.8 du/ac to 26 du/ac to 55.6du/ac(or up to 58.4 at full buildout of 900units).All additional residential units would be constructed on the existing footprint of the project site. The proposed density increase of 300 dwelling units would also require the addition of 2.35 acres of parkland, 30 additional affordable housing units as part of the total 300 proposed, and 3.24acres of net useable land for Community Purpose Facilities off-siteconsistent with Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19.48.025. The proposed modifications would not require an expansion of the project sitefrom that studied in the FEIR,and would not substantially change trip distribution patterns. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the FEIR, or substantial increases in any identified significant impacts are anticipated; however, the proposed modification represents new information that was not available at the time that the FEIR was certified. Therefore, the City has prepared this addendum pursuant to CEQA § 15162 to disclose minor changes in the proposedproject, and minor changes in some of the environmental effects as a result of proposed modifications. 11361 4May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1001 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 5IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS The following environmental analysis provided in Section 6.0 supports a determination that approval and implementation ofthe proposeddensity increaseto the FC-2site on PA 12would not result in any additional significant environmental effects beyond those previously analyzed under the FEIR for theproposed project. 6ANALYSIS Aesthetics/Landform Alterations Impacts to aestheticsare addressed in Section 5.2of the FEIR.As analyzed in the FEIR, theSPA Planwould not obstruct a scenic vista and no scenic resources are visible from nearby roadways, including Olympic Parkway,which is not a designated scenic highway, but is considered a “scenic corridor” as designated by the City of Chula Vista General Plan.The FEIR included an undulating landscaped buffer at the project frontage along Olympic Parkway as a project design feature; however, this feature was included in order to minimize impacts to visual quality resulting from the predominantly large-scale commercial development that was originally proposed. Those areas are now designated and proposed for residential and hotel uses. As such, the current proposal would offer more attractive urban scenes, and an undulating landscaped buffer is no longer necessary. Moreover, the adopted SPA Plan includes design development standards to minimize impacts to visual quality. The proposed modification wouldadd an additional 300 residential units to the portion of the FC-2 site east of Town Center Drive.This would result in a larger scale and massing of development approved for this portion of the project site under the FEIR, primarily attributed to taller residential buildings. However, the aesthetic nature of the residential development within these areas would not be substantially different.The additional units would be designed as a mid- rise style building, consisting of residential units and ground-floor retail which would wrap around an above-grade parking structure. This design feature would eliminate the need for large areas of surface parking lots.Therefore, the proposed modificationswould notresult inanysignificant impacts to scenic vistas or resources. The FEIR identified significant impacts resulting from additional light and glare to the area as the proposed projectwould introduce new land uses to a currently undeveloped site. The proposed modifications would introduce similar light and glare elements to the area; however, the project site boundaries would remain as analyzed previously and no new light and glare impacts beyond 11361 5May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1002 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 those identified in the FEIR would occur. Therefore, no new mitigation would be required beyond mitigation measures 5.2-1 through 5.2-9 as identified in the FEIR. Although the proposed modificationswould result in additional residential units, the modification would maintain all previously analyzed design standards and architectural considerations. Therefore, the proposed modificationswouldnot result in new substantial or significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the FEIR. Air Quality Impacts to air quality are addressed in Section 5.4of the FEIR. An air quality technical report was prepared for the proposed modificationsby Scientific Resources Associated (SRA 2017). The air quality technical report analyzed air quality impacts from the proposed modifications.Information provided in the air qualitytechnical report was compared against the analysis in the FEIR for a determination of overall netimpactsresulting from the proposed modifications. Construction emissions would not exceed those levels identified in the FEIR, with the exception of construction VOCs(SRA 2017).However, all pollutants, including construction VOC emissions, would remain below all significance thresholds for criteria air pollutantsand thus would not result in a significant impact to air quality(SRA 2017).Alloperational emissions would be lower than levels identified in the FEIR(SRA 2017). The site would be watered at least three times daily to control fugitive dust emissions,and vehicle speeds would not exceed 15 miles per hour,per FEIR mitigation measure 5.4-2. In addition,low- VOC paints would be utilized during architectural coatings. With incorporation of these design features, construction emissions were estimated to be below construction emissions estimated in the FEIR. The FEIR also identified mitigation measures 5.4-1 and 5.4-2,which reflectdust control emissions. measures and measures to reduce VOC and NO x Therefore, nonew significant sourcesof construction or operational air emissionsor health risk impacts beyond those identified in the FEIR would occur with implementation of the proposed modifications to the proposed project. Biological Resources Impacts to biological resourcesare addressed in Section 5.8of the FEIR. As indicated in theFEIR, no sensitive habitat or wetlands occur on the project site, and there is a low potential for sensitive plant species to occur on site and no sensitive plant species were observed at the time of surveying. Sensitive animal species observed on site include golden eagles and tricolored blackbirds; 11361 6May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1003 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 however, no nesting activity or suitable habitat for these species were observed. The proposed modificationswould not exceed previouslyestablished boundariesfor project developmentas approvedin the SPA Planand the proposedmodifications would be subjectto mitigation as provided in Section 5.8.Therefore, no new or increased levels of impacts to biological resources would result from implementation of the proposed modificationsbeyond those previously analyzedin the FEIR. Water Resourcesand Water Quality Impacts to water quality are addressed in Section 5.10of the FEIR. SPA-level water quality technical reports were completed for the proposed projectas analyzed in the FEIR. The proposed modificationswould continue to comply with allapplicable rules and regulations including compliance with NPDES permit requirements for urban runoff and storm water discharge. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for design, treatment and monitoring for storm water quality would be implemented as delineated in the FEIR with respect to municipal and construction permits. Project drainage and storm water quality reports, prepared in compliance with local, state, and federal regulations, would be updated to reflect changes in development of the project site as a result of the proposed modifications. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing water quality as well as implementation of all mitigation measures outlined in Section 5.10of the FEIR would ensure no additional impacts to water quality beyond those previously analyzedwould occur as a result of the proposed modifications. Noise The PA-12 East Addendum to the Prior Noise Study(noise study) (Dudek 2018)concludes that the future noise levels from trafficwould exceed the City’s maximum exterior noise level criterion of 65 dBACNELat open space areas and first-floor balconies for residences along the northern and eastern boundaries of the FC-2site facingOlympic Parkway. Additionally, the exterior noise levels for second-floor balconies located at the intersection of Olympic Parkway and Promenade Street would exceed the City’s maximum exterior noise level criterion.TheOtay Ranch GDP has policies in place to requireappropriate sound attenuation project features for all required residential open space and public open space areas that are exposed to a noise level of 65 dBA CNEL or greater. Consistent with these policies, balconies planned on these residential units that are counted toward any open space requirements wouldincorporate appropriate sound attenuating project featuresaround the perimeter of the balconies. 11361 7May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1004 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 Further, the ground-floor level exterior common areas within the line-of-sight of Olympic Parkway and Eastlake Parkwaywould require noise attenuation in the form of noise barriers.Noise barriers would be extendedalong Eastlake Parkway for the Parklet and along the portion of Olympic Parkway adjacent tothe Northern Patio Amenity Area. Consistent with Mitigation Measure 5.5-1 of the approved EIR (City of Chula Vista 2002), and to comply with the City and State’s 45 dB CNEL interior noise standard, the following measuresis required: a.Prior to the approval of site development plans, the applicant shall submit a supplemental noise analysis acceptable to the Director of Planning and Building demonstrating that interior noise levels would not exceed 45 dB CNEL. b.A noise barrier with a minimum height of 6 feet shall be constructed along the eastern edge of the site next to Eastlake Parkway, unless that proposed open space area is not needed to meet the project’s exterior open space requirement. Figure 1of the noise study (Dudek 2018)shows the location of the barrier. c.A noise barrier with a minimum height of 6 feet shall be constructed (as shown in Figure 1of the noise study, Dudek 2018) to block the noise from Olympic Parkway from the Northern Patio Amenity Area. d.Building receptors A1, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, and B7, as identified in the noise study (Dudek 2018)shallrequire Plexiglass or other clear-view panels at first- floor balconies/open space areas within the line-of-sight Olympic Parkway if the balconies/open space areas are used to satisfy the project’s open space requirement. With the additions of these noise barriers, and full compliance with the Otay Ranch GDP policies as discussed above,the proposed modifications would not exceed the City’s applicable limits established in the noise ordinance in accordance with Mitigation Measure 5.5-1 of the approved FEIR. Therefore, no new significant impacts would occur beyond what is analyzed in the FEIR. Traffic, Circulation, and Access Impacts to trafficare addressed in Section 5.3of the FEIR. Atrafficmemorandum has been conducted for this Addendumin April 2019to evaluate the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed modifications(Chen Ryan 2019).When analyzing potential trip generation and traffic impacts, the entire FC-2 site is accounted for, with the proposed modifications. 11361 8May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1005 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 Under the proposed modifications, the FC-2 site would generate approximately 7,681daily tripswith the 15% transit and mixed-use reduction, a 10% transit reduction, and a 10% walk/bike mode-share reduction.The proposed modifications would generate less traffic both in daily trips and PM peak hour trips compared to the FEIR. As analyzed in the traffic memorandum, the increase in AM peak hour trips would not result in any new significant traffic impacts during the Existing Plus Project or Horizon (Year 2030) conditions (Chen Ryan 2019). Addiiontally, all project driveways, as well as the project frontage would operate at acceptable levels of services with adequate queueing storage along Town Center Drive, with the exception of the left-turn movement during the PM peak hour at Olympic Parkway/Town Center Drive (Chen Ryan 2019). However, currently installed “do not block” signage would prevent potential queueing from interfering with traffic circulation (Chen Ryan 2019). Therefore, no new significant impacts would occur beyond what is analyzed in the FEIR. Public Services and Utilities Impacts to publicservices and utilities are addressed in Section 5.12of the FEIR. The following technical studies were prepared for the proposed modifications: Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 Freeway Commercial SPA Amendment Water System Evaluation (Dexter Wilson 2017a) Private Water System Analysis for the Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 East Residential Site (Dexter Wilson 2019a) Sewer System Evaluationfor the Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 Freeway Commercial SPA Amendment(Dexter Wilson 2017b) Sewer System Analysis for the Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 East Residential Site (Dexter Wilson 2019b) Water Demand and Water System The proposed projectwater demands were included in the Otay Water District(OWD) February 2015 Water Supply Assessment and Verification (WSAV). Table 1summarizes the projected water demands as presented in the WSAVand projected demand based on the proposed modifications. As shown, projected water demand withthe proposed modifications would decreaseby 13,900gallons per day, or 16acre-feet per year,ascompared tothe assumptionsin the 2015 WSAV (Dexter Wilson 2017a).The reduction in demand is a result of updated water demand factors used in the OWD 2015 Water Facilities Master Plan. These 11361 9May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1006 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 updated water demand factors for residential development are based on actual usage data and reflect lower projected usage per unit as a result of water conservation efforts in recent years. Table 1 Proposed Project Water Demand Summary Land UseAcresBuilding UnitsUnit Demand FactorTotal Demand (gpd) WSAV Water Demand(2015WSAV) 1 MF Residential Units—650255gpd/unit165,750 Hotel Rooms—310115 gpd/room35,650 Commercial3.6—1,785 gpd/ac6,428 Subtotal207,828 Proposed ModificationPotable Water Demand 1,2 Multi-Family Residential—900170gpd/unit153,000 1 Hotels—300115 gpd/unit34,500 2 Commercial3.6—1,785gpd/ac6,428 Subtotal193,928 DecreasedWater Demand13,900 Source: Dexter Wilson 2017a Notes:gpd = gallons per day 1 Assumes recycled water to be used for irrigation. 2 Based on 2015 Water Facilities Master Plan (OWD). The recommended water system was outlined in the 2002Sub Area Master Planfor the proposed projectand included in the OWD 2015 Water Facilities Master Plan.As shown in Table 1, the projected water demand for the proposed modificationsis lower than what was estimated in the 2015 WSAVreport.Thus, impacts on water supply due to implementation of the proposed modifications have been adequately evaluated and do not require any changes or updates (Dexter Wilson 2017a). The sizing of the existing 16-inch water line in Olympic Parkway, 20-inch line in Eastlake Parkway, and proposed 12-inch line in Town Center Driveareadequate to support the proposed modificationsand, therefore, no changes to the proposed projectwater systemas analyzed in the FEIRare necessary as a result of the proposed modifications(Dexter Wilson 2017a).Additionally, the proposed modificationswould comply with the City of Chula Vista Guidelines for water conservation, including the use of recycledwater for landscaping and implementation of additional water conservation measures such as hot water pipe insulation, pressure reducing valves, and water efficient dishwashers. As such, the proposed modifications would not result in any newsignificant environmental effects beyond those previously analyzed under the FEIR for theproposed project. 11361 10May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1007 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 Regarding recycled water use, the proposed modificationwould use recycled water for irrigation of the park site and common areas associated with the commercial and residential sites. Table 2 shows the average recycled water demand associated with the proposed modifications. Table 2 Proposed Modifications Projected Recycled Water Demand Recycled Water Net Recycled Average Land UseQuantityFactorAcreageUnit RateDemand 1 Multi-Family Residential900units15%—30gpd/unit27,000 1 Commercial4.0acres10%0.41,900gpd/ac760 1 Park2.0 acres100%2.01,900gpd/ac3,800 Total31,560gpd Source: Dexter Wilson 2017a Notes:gpd = gallons per day 1 Based on OWD 2015 Water Facilities Master Plan. As shown in Table 2, the estimated average recycled water demand for the proposed modifications is 31,560gallons per day, or 35.4acre-feet per year, which would not necessitate changes to the approved recycled water system(Dexter Wilson 2017a).As such, the proposed modifications would not result in any newsignificant environmental effects beyond those previously analyzed under the FEIR for theproposed project. Wastewater Demand and Wastewater System The August 2004 approved SPA plan provided projected wastewater flows. Table 3shows a comparison between projected wastewater flows for the proposed projectand wastewater flows basedon the land usesofthe proposed modifications. Table 3 Proposed Modifications Wastewater Flow Summary Land UseAcresBuilding UnitsGeneration FactorAverage Flow (gpd) OriginallyApproved Wastewater Flow Commercial34.5—2,500 gpd/ac86,250 Proposed ModificationWastewater Flow Multi-Family Residential —900182gpd/unit163,800 1 Hotels—30076gpd/unit22,800 Park2.0—410gpd/ac820 11361 11May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1008 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 Table 3 Proposed Modifications Wastewater Flow Summary Land UseAcresBuilding UnitsGeneration FactorAverage Flow (gpd) Commercial1.4—1,401gpd/ac1,960 Subtotal189,380 Increased Wastewater Flow103,130 2 Increased Wastewater EDUs448 Source: Dexter Wilson 2017b Notes:gpd = gallons per day, EDU = equivalent dwelling unit 1 Based on 0.33 EDU per room. 2 Based on 230 gpd/EDU. The Poggi Canyon Basin Gravity Sewer Development Impact Fee Update (DIF report) was completed in April 2009, which projected wastewater flows associated with the Poggi Canyon Interceptor. Table 4shows a comparison of wastewater flows associated with the proposed modificationsand projected flows as presented in the DIF report. Table 4 Proposed Modificationsand Poggi Basin Wastewater Flow Summary 1 DescriptionQuantityUnit Flow FactorAverage Flow, gpdEDUs 2009 DIF Study C-130.4 ac2,500 gdp/ac76,000330.4 C-28.2 ac2,500 gdp/ac20,50089.1 Subtotal 2009 DIF Study420 Proposed Modifications Multi-Family Residential 900units182gpd/unit163,800712.2 Hotels300units76gpd/unit22,80099.1 Park2.0 acre410gpd/ac8203.6 Commercial1.4acre1,401gpd/ac1,9608.5 Subtotal Proposed Modifications823 Increase403 Source:Dexter Wilson 2017b Notes:gpd = gallons per day 1 Based on 230 gpd/EDU. 2009 DIF Study was based on 265 gpd/EDU. The proposed on-site wastewater system would consist of gravity sewer lines that would convey flow to the Poggi Canyon Interceptor in Olympic Parkway. Based on the average flow presented in Table 3and a peak factor of 2.22from the City Subdivision Manual, the projected peak flow for the proposed modificationsis 0.42million gallons per day.An 8-inch gravity sewer line with a minimum slope of 1.0% is adequate to convey this projected total flow. 11361 12May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1009 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 Additionally, the proposed modificationsdo not require additional reaches of the Poggi Interceptor to be upgraded in the future. Therefore, although the proposed modificationswould exceed the units anticipated in the 2009 Poggi DIF report, the limits of the required DIF improvements remain the same. Further, the proposed modificationswould be required to update the Poggi DIF study as a condition of approval(Dexter Wilson 2017b).The project is consistent withFEIR Mitigation Measures 5.12-11 through 5.12-13, which require the applicant to demonstrate adequate capacity in the Poggi Canyon sewer line.As demonstrated above, there is adequate sewer capacity.Also, when the proposedproject comes forward for approval, itwill be conditioned to pay sewer fees andconnect to the sewer system.As such, the proposed modifications would not result in any new significant environmental effects beyond those previously analyzed under the FEIR for the proposed project. Police Protection, Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services, Schools, Libraries, and Parks As described in Section 5.12 of the FEIR, police, fire and emergency medical, library, and school facilities would be financed as part of therequiredPublic Facilities Financing Plan(PFFP).The project’s PFFP would be modified to reflect the changes in land uses within the site resulting from the proposed residential development to provide adequate public facilities impact fees.Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19.80.030 (Controlled Residential Development) is intended to ensure that new development would not degrade existing public services and facilities below acceptable standards for schools and other public services. The PFFP prepared in conjunction withthe preparation of a SPA Plan for a project is intended to ensure development of the project is consistent with the overall goals and policies of the General Plan and would not degrade public services.Section 19.09 also requires a PFFP and the demonstration that public services meet the growth management ordinance quality of life threshold standards. The PFFP would ensure funding for any needed expansion of services and that public services would be provided commensurate with development and demand.Pursuant to Government Code Section 65996, the payment of these fees by a developer serves to fully mitigate all potential project impacts on school facilities to less than significant levels.Consistent with mitigation required by the FEIR, all required schoolfees would be paid prior to issuance of building permits. The PFFP would address any development impact fee requirements to ensure funding for any needed expansion of public services facilities, including police and fire facilities, parks, and libraries, commensurate with development and demand. Any resulting increase in public facilities space, such as schools or libraries, would be minor, likely located within already developed or developing areas of the vicinity,and would not result in an adverse physical impact on the environment, consistent with the City’s CEQA thresholds. The proposed modifications includes an increase of 300 residential units.The proposed modificationswould require 11361 13May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1010 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 an additional approximate2.35 acres of parkland, which would be met through payment of Park Benefit Fees.As such, the proposed modifications would not result in any new significant environmental effects beyond those previously analyzed under the FEIR for the proposedproject. 7CONCLUSION This document has identified all changed circumstances and new information and memorializes in detail the City’s reasoned conclusion that none of these changes create the conditions requiring the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163. Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above discussion, I hereby find that approval and implementation of the proposed project will result in only minor technical changes or additions, which are necessary to make the FEIRadequate under CEQA. ________________________________________________ Name/TitleDate Attachments:Figures 1–3 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation –Otay Ranch Planning Area 12FC SPA Plan 8REFERENCES Chen Ryan.2019. Otay Ranch PA 12 Freeway Commercial North –Traffic Analysis Memorandum.April 24. City of Chula Vista. 2003.Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional PlanningArea (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12. SCH # 1989010154. Dexter Wilson Engineering, Inc. 2017a. Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 Freeway Commercial SPA AmendmentWater System Evaluation. September 25. Dexter Wilson Engineering, Inc. 2017b. Sewer System Evaluation for the Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 Freeway Commercial SPA Amendment. September 25. Dexter Wilson Engineering, Inc. 2019a. Private Water System Analysis for the Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 East Residential Site. February 27. 11361 14May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1011 of 1481 Third Addendum to EIR Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 Dexter Wilson Engineering, Inc. 2019b. Sewer System Analysis for the Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 East Residential Site. 2019b. February 25. Dudek. 2018. PA-12 East–Addendum to Prior Noise Study and EIR. July 3. SRA(Scientific Resources Associated).2017.Air Quality and GHG Impacts Planning Area 12. July 19. 11361 15May 2019 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1012 of 1481 Figures 1–3 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1013 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1014 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1015 of 1481 Page 1016 of 1481 8 1 0 2 s n o S d n a n i w d l a B : E C R U O S 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Summary of Impacts and Mitigation – Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 FC SPA Plan 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1017 of 1481 Page 1018 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1019 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1020 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1021 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1022 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1023 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1024 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1025 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1026 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1027 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1028 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1029 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1030 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1031 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1032 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1033 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1034 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1035 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1036 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1037 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1038 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1039 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1040 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1041 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1042 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1043 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1044 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1045 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1046 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1047 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet RESOLUTION NO. 2019- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE THIRD ADDENDUM (IS- 17-0005) TO FEIR 02-04; APPROVING AN AMENDMENTTO THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLANTO REFLECT LAND USE CHANGESFOR APPROXIMATELY 36 ACRESWITHINTHEOTAYRANCHFREEWAY COMMERCIAL PLANNING AREA 12 PLANNED COMMUNITY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED TEXT, MAPS AND TABLES I.RECITALS A.Project Site WHEREAS, the areas of land which are the subject of this Resolution contain all lands within the boundaries of Exhibit 1attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,and includes approximately 36 acres of land generally located south of Olympic Parkway, west of EastLake Parkwayand eastof SR-125within the Otay Ranch Planned CommunityFreeway Commercial North (FC-2) area; and B.Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, inNovember, 2017, the City of Chula Vista deemed the Baldwin and Sons, LLC(Applicant) application complete and initiated a Otay Ranch General Development Plan Amendment (GDPA)(the“Project”); and WHEREAS, the proposed GDPA involvesamending portions of Part IIof the Otay Ranch General Development Plan(GDP), including associated text, maps and tables; and WHEREAS, the proposed GDPA iscontained in a document entitled “PA12 –Freeway Commercial North (FC-2) Amendment (PCM17-0012), May 2019” as representedin Exhibit 2 attached heretoand incorporated herein by this reference;and C.Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the Otay Ranch GDPwas approved on October 23, 1993, and most recently updated on May15, 2018; and WHEREAS, the GDPA as presented isnecessary to accommodate the land uses anticipated in the associated DevelopmentAgreement amendment between the City of Chula Vista and Village II Town Center, LLC and Sunranch Capital Partners, LLC for Freeway Commercial North (FC-2) (Development Agreement); and 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1048 of 1481 Resolution 2019-_______Page 2of 3 WHEREAS, the GDPA wasdesigned to address and accommodatedevelopment of a transit-supportive mixed use residential developmentwith ancillary commercial and a highly amenitized urban park; and WHEREAS, the next step in the process would require the approval of an amendment to the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Planand Development Agreement, and a Design Review (DR) for Freeway Commercial North (FC-2); and D.Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 65090, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the GDPA; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introducedbefore the Planning Commission at the public hearing on this Project, and the Minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record subsequent to these proceedings; and E.City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the GDPAand notice of said hearing, together with its purpose given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 65090, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject GDPA. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: II.COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA That the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Project was covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan–Planning Area 12(FEIR-02-04) (SCH#1989010154). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has caused the preparationof a Third Addendum to FEIR-02-04. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, as set forth in the record of its proceedings, the Third Addendum to FEIR- 02-04 in the form presented, has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and has considered the Addendum to FEIR-02-04. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1049 of 1481 Resolution 2019-_______Page 3of 3 III.GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN INTERNAL CONSISTENCY The City Council hereby finds and determines that the General Development Plan, as amended, is internally consistent and shall remain internally consistent following amendment thereof by this Resolution. IV.ADOPTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT In light of the findings above, the City Council hereby approves the General Development Plan Amendmentin the form as presented in Exhibit 2attached heretoand incorporated herein by this referenceand on file in the City Clerk's Office. Presented by:Approved as to form by: _________________________________________ Kelly Broughton, FASLAGlen R. Googins Development Services DirectorCity Attorney 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1050 of 1481 July 3, 2018 11040-7266 Tori Massie Baldwin & Sons Project Coordinator 610 West Ash, Suite 1500 San Diego, California 92101 Subject: PA-12 East Addendum to Prior Noise Study Dear Ms. Massie: Dudek has completed this focused noise re-assessment for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Planning Area 12 (PA-12), in the City of Chula Vista, California. This letter specifically addresses the East portion of the PA-12 development, specifically east of Town Center Drive. At your request, we have re-evaluated the adjacent roadway traffic noise and BRT noise based upon current site information. Please note that all sound levels in this report are A-weighted. Definitions of acoustical terms used in this report are provided in Attachment 1. The City of Chula Vista General Plan Noise Element indicates that the maximum allowable exterior noise level for new residential developments is a Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of 65 A-weighted decibels (dBA) (City of Chula Vista 2005). California Building Code (Part 2, Title 24, California Code of Regulations) requires that the interior noise level attributable to exterior noise sources not exceed 45 dBA CNEL for multi-family residential buildings. The City of Chula Vista also requires that interior noise levels attributable to exterior noise sources not exceed a CNEL of 45 dBA within residences. Typically, with the windows open, building shells provide approximately 15 dBA of noise reduction. Therefore, rooms exposed to an exterior CNEL greater than 60 dBA could result in an interior CNEL greater than 45 dBA. The California Building Code recognizes this relationship and therefore requires interior noise studies when the exterior noise level is projected to exceed 60 dBA CNEL. The exterior noise analysis follows the same general procedure outlined in Noise Assessment Technical Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1051 of 1481 Ms. Tori Massie Subject: PA-12 East Addendum to Prior Noise Study Plan Planning Area 12 (PA-12). Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data for the adjacent arterial roadways was input in a computer model along with topographical data and site plan information. CadnaA (Computer Aided Noise Abatement) is a software program for calculation, presentation, assessment and prediction of environmental noise. This program was used to build an updated exterior noise model for the project specific area. For the updated modeling, the more detailed site plan provided by the applicant was utilized for the analysis. Figure 1 shows the location of the modeled receiver based on these updated plans. Olympic Parkway and Eastlake Parkway make up the northern and eastern boundaries of the site. These two roads are the focus of the traffic noise modeling update. The posted speed on Olympic Parkway is 50 mph (80 kmh). This speed was assumed for both Olympic Parkway and Eastlake Parkway. Table 1 shows the traffic data used for the noise model. Table 1 Traffic Volumes Associated with Local Roadways Segments Utilizing the most recent plan sets and grading elevations available for the mixed use product types currently planned for the site, we refined a traffic noise model in CadnaA for the project. The same traffic volumes as used in the prior noise Addendum (Dudek 2015) were utilized for this analysis specifically, the Horizon Year future traffic volumes as provided by Chen Ryan (Chen Ryan 2015), because these volumes are still current (i.e., there have been no revised projections). Modeled receiver points were placed at the proposed poolside location, the parklet, and other outdoor areas as well as balcony areas, as shown in Figure 1. Receiver heights corresponding to 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th floor elevations were modeled for balconies, based on the provided plans (Baldwin and Sons 2018). The planned pool area was also incorporated into the updated model. Table 2 and Table 3 show the updated calculated exterior traffic noise levels. To place the reported exterior noise levels in context, where noise levels exceed 65 A-weighted decibels (dBA) Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), exterior mitigation is required; At locations 11040-7266 2 July 2018 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1052 of 1481 Ms. Tori Massie Subject: PA-12 East Addendum to Prior Noise Study where exterior noise levels exceed 60 dBA CNEL, interior analysis is required. Numbers displayed in bold indicate where levels exceed 65 dBA CNEL, and italicized numbers indicate where levels exceed 60 dBA CNEL. Table 2 Summary of On-Site Traffic Noise Levels1 (dBA CNEL) at Outdoor Use Locations Table 3 Summary of On-Site Traffic Noise Levels (dBA CNEL) at Balconies 11040-7266 3 July 2018 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1053 of 1481 Ms. Tori Massie Subject: PA-12 East Addendum to Prior Noise Study Table 3 Summary of On-Site Traffic Noise Levels (dBA CNEL) at Balconies 11040-7266 4 July 2018 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1054 of 1481 Ms. Tori Massie Subject: PA-12 East Addendum to Prior Noise Study Table 3 Summary of On-Site Traffic Noise Levels (dBA CNEL) at Balconies Balcony barriers. For exterior noise levels at the multi-family residential buildings, the Otay Ranch GDP has policies in place to require appropriate sound attenuation project features for all required residential open space and public open space areas that are exposed to a noise level of 65 dBA CNEL or greater. Consistent with these policies, balconies planned on these residential units that are counted as part of an open space requirement would need to incorporate appropriate sound attenuating project features around the perimeter of the balconies so as not to exceed the 65 dB CNEL threshold. Based upon the data shown in Table 3, building receptors A1, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, and B7 at first-floor balconies/open space areas and B1 at the second floor balcony would require Plexiglass or other clear-view panels within the line-of-sight of Olympic Parkway if the balconies/open space areas open space requirement. The height of such panels should be a minimum of 6 feet, in order to ensure a minimum noise reduction of 5 decibels. Noise wall. Based upon the data shown in Table 2, the ground-floor level exterior common areas (Parklet and Northern Patio Amenity Area) within the line-of-sight of Olympic Parkway and Eastlake Parkway would require noise attenuation in the form of noise barriers. The height of such panels should be a minimum of 6 feet, in order to ensure a minimum noise reduction of 5 decibels. The noise barrier would be extended along Eastlake Parkway as shown in Figure 1 for the parklet. For the Northern Patio Amenity Area, the wall would need to be positioned as shown in Figure 1. 11040-7266 5 July 2018 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1055 of 1481 Ms. Tori Massie Subject: PA-12 East Addendum to Prior Noise Study The noise barriers should have a surface density of at least four pounds per square foot and be free of openings and cracks (with the exception of expansion joints gaps and other construction techniques, which could create an opening or crack). The noise barriers may be constructed of acrylic glass, masonry material, earthen berm, or a combination of these materials. With construction of a solid noise barrier between the Parklet and Eastlake Parkway, and the Northern Patio Amenity Area and Olympic Parkway, exterior noise impacts would be less than significant. Interior Noise. Based upon Table 2, traffic noise levels would exceed 60 dB CNEL for residential units facing Olympic Parkway. These units/floors will require subsequent acoustical analyses to verify compliance with the state of California (CCR Title 24) and City of Chula Vista 45 dB CNEL interior noise standard. As discussed in a prior noise study for the project (Dudek, 2015), the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route will be located along the future extension of East Palomar Street adjacent to the southern boundary of the project site. Noise sensitive receptors that would be affected by the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit project that would extend East Palomar Street along the southern portion of the project site include the multi-family residential buildings on the southwest portion of the PA-12 site. Previous noise modeling based on methodology identified by the Federal Transit Authority (FTA 2006) and utilizing the FHWA TNM 2.5 traffic noise model (FHWA) was conducted to determine the noise level associated with the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit project on a separate portion of Otay Ranch. It was determined that at a distance of 40 feet from the centerline of the nearest side of East Palomar Street the buildings would experience a maximum future noise level of 64 dB CNEL at the first floor. Based upon recently discovered noise emission levels used for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project (Kimley-Horn and Associates, 2012), the BRT line is anticipated to result in 60 dB CNEL at a distance of 50 feet. This would equate to a 65 dB CNEL at a distance of 28 feet from the BRT centerline. Providing that the nearest residential units are not located within 28 feet of the BRT centerline, the exterior use areas (patios or balconi exterior noise standard. Additionally, residential units within 50 feet of the BRT centerline would require subsequent acoustical analysis to verify compliance with the state of California (CCR Title 24) and the City of Chula Vista 45 dB CNEL interior noise standard. Based upon the current site plans, none of the buildings in the PA-12 east portion of the site are located within 50 feet of the BRT centerline. Therefore, noise impacts from the BRT line would be less than significant. No noise mitigation would be required for the BRT line noise. 11040-7266 6 July 2018 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1056 of 1481 Ms. Tori Massie Subject: PA-12 East Addendum to Prior Noise Study 1. Consistent with Mitigation Measure 5.5-1 of the approved EIR (City of Chula Vista 2002), and to comply with the City and 45 dB CNEL interior noise standard, the following mitigation measure is required: a. Prior to the approval of site development plans, the applicant shall submit a supplemental noise analysis acceptable to the Director of Planning and Building demonstrating that interior noise levels would not exceed 45 dB CNEL. b. A noise barrier with a minimum height of 6 feet shall be constructed along the eastern edge of the site next to Eastlake Parkway, unless that proposed open space area is not . Figure 1 shows the location of the barrier. c. A noise barrier with a minimum height of 6 feet shall be constructed (as shown in Figure 1) to block the noise from Olympic Parkway from the Northern Patio Amenity Area. d. Building receptors A1, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, and B7 would require Plexiglass or other clear-view panels at first-floor balconies/open space areas within the line-of-sight Olympic Parkway if the balconies/open space areas are used This completes this focused noise report for the PA-12 East project. Should you have any questions regarding the above information, please call me at 760.479.4248. Sincerely, ________________________ Brian Grover Environmental Specialist/Project Manager bgrover@dudek.com 760.479.4248 __________________________________ Christopher Barnobi, INCE Bd.Cert. Environmental Acoustician cbarnobi@dudek.com Att.: Figure 1 Attachment 1 Definitions 11040-7266 7 July 2018 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1057 of 1481 Ms. Tori Massie Subject: PA-12 East Addendum to Prior Noise Study Chen Ryan. 2015. Otay Ranch PA 12 Trip Generation Review. February 12. City of Chula Vista. 2002. Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 EIR Freeway Commercial. City of Chula Vista. 2005. City of Chula Vista General Plan December 13. Dudek. 2015. PA-12 FC-2 Amendment Acoustical Assessment Report. March 20, 2015. FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2004. (Version 2.5 Addendum). April. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2012. Draft Noise Analysis Report, South Bay Bus Rapid Transit. Prepared for San Diego Association of Governments. December 2012. 11040-7266 8 July 2018 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1058 of 1481 PA-12 Exterior Noise Study B10B10 Page 1059 of 1481 B11B11 M1M1 B9B9 M2M2 B8B8 B7B7 B6B6 B5B5 B4B4 Noise Measurement Locations and Proposed Soundwall B3B3 B2B2 B1B1 M5M5 A8A8 A7A7 A6A6 A5A5 M4M4 A4A4 A3A3 A2A2 M3M3 A1A1 8 1 0 2 s n o S & n i w d l a 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet B : E C R U O S Path: Z:\\Projects\\j1104001\\MAPDOC\\Noise Page 1060 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Definitions 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1061 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1062 of 1481 ATTACHMENT 1 Definitions Ambient Noise Level The composite of noise from all sources near and far. The normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location. A-Weighted Sound Level, (Dba) The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighted filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear and correlates well with Community Equivalent CNEL is the A-weighted equivalent continuous Sound Level (CNEL) sound exposure (CNEL) level for a 24-hour period with a 10 dB adjustment added to sound levels occurring during the nighttime hours (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) and 5 dB added to the sound during the evening hours (7 p.m. to 10 p.m.). Decibel, (dB) A unit for measuring sound pressure level and is equal to 10 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the measured sound pressure squared to a reference pressure, which is 20 micropascals. Time-Average Sound Level The sound level corresponding to a steady state level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. TAV is designed to average all of the loud and quiet sound levels occurring over a time period. 11040-7266 1-1 July 2018 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1063 of 1481 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 11040-7266 2July 2018 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1064 of 1481 DEXTER WILSON ENGINEERING, INC. WATER WASTEWATER RECYCLED WATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS -4422 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1065 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1066 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1067 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1068 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1069 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1070 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1071 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1072 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1073 of 1481 Page 1074 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1075 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1076 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1077 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1078 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1079 of 1481 Page 1080 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1081 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1082 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1083 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1084 of 1481 2 3 1 4 6 7 5 8 Project 125 9 Site 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1085 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1086 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1087 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1088 of 1481 2 3 1 4 6 7 5 8 Project 125 9 Site 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1089 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1090 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1091 of 1481 2 3 1 4 6 7 5 8 Project 125 9 Site 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1092 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1093 of 1481 2 3 1 4 6 7 5 8 Project 125 9 Site 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1094 of 1481 2 3 1 4 6 7 5 8 Project 125 9 Site 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1095 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1096 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1097 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1098 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1099 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1100 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1101 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1102 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1103 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1104 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1105 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1106 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1107 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1108 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1109 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1110 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1111 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1112 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1113 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1114 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1115 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1116 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1117 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1118 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1119 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1120 of 1481 Page 1121 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1122 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1123 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1124 of 1481 Page 1125 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1126 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1127 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1128 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1129 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1130 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1131 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1132 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1133 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1134 of 1481 Page 1135 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1136 of 1481 Page 1137 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1138 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1139 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1140 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1141 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1142 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1143 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1144 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1145 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1146 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1147 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1148 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1149 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1150 of 1481 Page 1151 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1152 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1153 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1154 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1155 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1156 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1157 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1158 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1159 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1160 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1161 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1162 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1163 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1164 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1165 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1166 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet Page 1167 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1168 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1169 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1170 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1171 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1172 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1173 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1174 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1175 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1176 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1177 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1178 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1179 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1180 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1181 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1182 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1183 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1184 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1185 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1186 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1187 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1188 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1189 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1190 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1191 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1192 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1193 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1194 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1195 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1196 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1197 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1198 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1199 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1200 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1201 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1202 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1203 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1204 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1205 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1206 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1207 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1208 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1209 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1210 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1211 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1212 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1213 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1214 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1215 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1216 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1217 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1218 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1219 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1220 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1221 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1222 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1223 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1224 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1225 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1226 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1227 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1228 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1229 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1230 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1231 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1232 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1233 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1234 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1235 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1236 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1237 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1238 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1239 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1240 of 1481 Page 1241 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda Packet 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1242 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1243 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1244 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1245 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1246 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1247 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1248 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1249 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1250 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1251 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1252 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1253 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1254 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1255 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1256 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1257 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1258 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1259 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1260 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1261 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1262 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1263 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1264 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1265 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1266 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1267 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1268 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1269 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1270 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1271 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1272 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1273 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1274 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1275 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1276 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1277 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1278 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1279 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1280 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1281 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1282 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1283 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1284 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1285 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1286 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1287 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1288 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1289 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1290 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1291 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1292 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1293 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1294 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1295 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1296 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1297 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1298 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1299 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1300 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1301 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1302 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1303 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1304 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1305 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1306 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1307 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1308 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1309 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1310 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1311 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1312 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1313 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1314 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1315 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1316 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1317 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1318 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1319 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1320 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1321 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1322 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1323 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1324 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1325 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1326 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1327 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1328 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1329 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1330 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1331 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1332 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1333 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1334 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1335 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1336 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1337 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1338 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1339 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1340 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1341 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1342 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1343 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1344 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1345 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1346 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1347 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1348 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1349 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1350 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1351 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1352 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1353 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1354 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1355 of 1481 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1356 of 1481 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTAAPPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, DESIGN PLAN, AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORYDOCUMENTS;ANDAPPROVINGAN AMENDMENTTOTHEOTAYRANCHFREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH MASTER PRECISE PLAN I.RECITALS A.Project Site WHEREAS, the parcel, that is the subject matter of this resolution, is represented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,and for the purpose of general description is located in the northern portion of Planning Area 12 of Otay Ranch; and B.Project; Applications for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on November 16, 2017, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin & Sons (Applicant) requesting approval of amendments to the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area Plan, including Design Planand associated regulatory documents, and amendments to theOtay Ranch Freeway Commercial North Master Precise Plan (MPA 17-0011) for the Freeway Commercial North portion of Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 (PA-12); and C.Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Development Services Director set the time and place for a hearing on the project, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertisedinthe Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the project,and the Minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 6-1-0-0recommending that the City Council approvethe project; and 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1357 of 1481 Resolution No. 2019- Page 2 D.City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista for consideration of the project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said project at the time and place as advertised in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby findand determine as follows: II.CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA Thatthe Development Services Directorreviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan-Planning Area 12(FEIR 02 -04) (SCH #1989010154), and has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has caused the preparationof a ThirdAddendum to FEIR 02- 04. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, asset forth in the record of its proceedings,the Third Addendum to FEIR-02-04 in the form presented, has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and has considered the Addendum to FEIR-02-04. III.SPA FINDINGS/APPROVAL A.THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS AMENDED, AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN, AS AMENDED, AND ITS SEVERAL ELEMENTS. The proposed SPA Plan amendment implements the GP and GDP. The GP land use designation isRetail Commercialand Mixed Use Residential. The proposed project is consistent with these land use designations. It contains all the requisite land uses comprising Retail Commercial and Mixed Use Residential: commercial hotels, mixed-use development, multi-family residential housing, a public park and open space. The current Otay Ranch GDPdesignation is Freeway Commercial and Mixed Use. The proposed project is consistent with these land use designations. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1358 of 1481 Resolution No. 2019- Page 3 B.THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS. The subdivision design consists of three (3) multi-family residential lots, three (3) mixed-use commercial –multi-family residential lots, two (2) hotel lots, two (2) open space lots, one (1) public park, one (1) private street, and one (1) remainder parcel. The condominium subdivision is planned to allow a maximum of 900 residential units. The Freeway Commercial SPA Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP)permits non-sequential phasing by mandatingspecific facilities requirements for each phase to ensure that the new Freeway Commercial SPA development in FC-2 is adequately served and City threshold standards are met. Anticipated Freeway Commercial North phasing is as follows. Hotel 1 is constructedand has been operating sinceApril, 2017. Residential West is under construction. Pursuant tothe executed Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Development Agreement recorded on June 17, 2015, and the amendment thereto, construction of Hotel 2 will commence prior to issuance of the 651stresidential building permit for the Project. Construction of the commercial component of the mixed use development will commence prior to or concurrently with obtaining building permits and commencing construction of the residential development located east of Town Center Drive. The Developer shall commence construction of the public park prior to the issuance of the 530thresidential building permit and substantially complete the park within 15 months of start of construction. The proposed project furthers the policy objective for “Urban Villages”to have “higher densities and mixed uses in the village cores,”“in transit focus areas”and to “provide a wide range of residential housing opportunities” which promotes a blend offor-sale and for-rent housing products and a range of densities integrated and compatible with other land uses in the area. The proposed project will support Smart Growth Principles, as it provides compact development oriented to pedestrians, bicyclists and transit, withshopping and recreational uses conveniently and centrally located and will minimize segregated and auto-dependent urban sprawl development patterns. C.THE OTAY RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIALSPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USES, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The proposed modifications to land use and development standard provisions within the project site have been fully analyzed and will not adversely affect the circulation system and overall land uses as previously envisioned in the Otay Ranch GDP and Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Plan. The existing infrastructure (sewer, water, public services and facilities) has been determined to be adequate to serve the proposedproject, as described in the Supplemental PFFP. Additionally, a Water Quality Technical Report, Traffic Impact Study, Noise Impact Report, Air Quality and Global Climate Change Evaluation, Sewer Service Technical Reportand Water Service Technical Reporthave been prepared, reviewed and approved by Citystaff. A Third Addendum to FEIR 02-02has been prepared to analyze the Project’s impacts. No additional environmental impactswere identified in the ThirdAddendumto FEIR 02-02. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1359 of 1481 Resolution No. 2019- Page 4 IV.MASTER PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS i.THAT SUCH PLAN WILL NOT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OFTHE PARTICULAR CASE BE DETRIMENTAL TOTHE HEALTH SAFETY OR GENERAL WELFARE OF PERSONS RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE VICINITY ORINJURIOUS TO PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY The City Councilfinds that the proposed precise plan and development standards contained in attached Exhibit C on file at the office of the CityClerk will not have a negative impact on the surroundingneighborhood because the proposed standards are consistent with the Otay Ranch GDPand Freeway Commercial SPA Plan. It allowsthe Applicant to design a project thatis compatible with the type and intensity of existing development in thearea.The proposedproject amendment allows a more intensive use of the previously approvedwalkable, mixed-use development for Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial North. It fully maximizes theland use potential of FC-2 within walking range of the Otay Ranch Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)stop,ensures transit-supportive densities near the BRT line, and provides a more diverse mix of housing types. ii.THAT SUCH PLAN SATISFIES THE PRINCIPLEFOR THE APPLICATIONOF THE P MODIFYINGDISTRICT AS SET FORTH IN CVMC 19.56.041: The City Council finds that application of the P modifying district is appropriate because the underlying zoning is Planned Community District. This Master Precise Plan is required by the Freeway Commercial SPA Plan (PC District Regulations), and provides the entitlement bridge linking the approved policies and land use designations of the Freeway Commercial SPA/Design Plan with subsequent project-level approvals within the project area. It serves as a framework document by which future “Individual Precise Plans” will be evaluated for compliance with the approved Master Precise Plan concepts that encompass streetscape and landscape design, signs, and architectural and lighting guidelines. iii.THAT ANY EXCEPTIONS GRANTED WHICH DEVIATE FROM THE UNDERLYING ZONING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE WARRANTED ONLY WHEN NECESSARY TO MEET THE PURPOSE AND APPLICATION OF THE P PRECISE PLAN MODIFYING DISTRICT: As the underlying zoning is Planned Community District,the Precise Plan as amended will provide higher development standards that will make the project more compatible with adjacent commercial uses. iv.THAT APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN WILL CONFORM TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ADOPTED POLICIES OF THE CITY. (ORD. 3153 § 2 (EXH. A), 2010; ORD. 1632 § 2, 1975): 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1360 of 1481 Resolution No. 2019- Page 5 The project has been designed and evaluated in accordance with the goals and objectivesof the General Plan.The Precise Plan as described above will allow the project to beconsistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Chula VistaMunicipal Code. V.APPROVALOF SPA AND MASTER PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT, Unless otherwise specified,the Conditions of Approval and Code requirements setforth below shall be completed prior to the issuance of Building Permits as determined by the Development Services Director and the City Engineer, or designees, unless otherwise specified. 1.Prior to approval of any land development permits, the Applicant shall demonstrate that the applicable Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP) project design features and measures outlined in the Air Quality Improvement Plan pertaining to the design, construction and operational phases of the project have been incorporated in the project design. 2.Prior to issuance of building permits or approval of landscape construction plans, the Applicant shall implement the applicable mandatory water quality conservation measures of the Water Conservation Plan of the SPA Plan. 3.All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Applicantas to any or all of the property. 4.If any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted including issuance of Building Permits, deny, or further condition the subsequent approvals that are derived from the approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions and/or seek damages for their violation. 5.The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, Planning Commission members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, fromCity’s actions on (a) the Third Addendum to FEIR-02-04,(b) the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project, (c) the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Plan (MPA17-0011), (d) any and all entitlements issued by the City in connection with the project, and/or (e)City’s approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non- discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the project site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Resolutionwhere indicated below. The Property Owner’s and Applicant’s compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner’s and Applicant’s successors and assigns. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1361 of 1481 Resolution No. 2019- Page 6 6. The Applicant shallcomply with all Conditions of Approval, guidelines, policies, and any other applicable requirements of the following plans and programs, as amended from time to time: The City of Chula Vista Municipal Code; the Chula Vista Subdivision Manual; City of Chula Vista Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan; City of Chula Vista Design and Construction Standards; the Development Storm Water Manual for Development and Redevelopment Projects; the City of Chula Vista Grading Ordinance, CVMC 15.04; the State of California Subdivision Map Act; the City of Chula Vista General Plan; the City’s Growth Management Ordinance; Chula Vista Design Manual; Chula Vista Landscape Manual; Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance; Chula Vista Fire Facility Master Plan, and Fire Department Policies and Procedures; Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan (RMP) Phase 1 and Phase 2, including the Preserve Conveyance Schedule; City of Chula Vista Adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Otay Ranch Wide Affordable Housing Plan; Otay Ranch Overall Design Plan; Otay Ranch Freeway CommercialSectional Planning Area (SPA, PCM-17-0011) Plan and supporting appendices, including: Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP)and Supplemental PFFP, Affordable Housing Plan, Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP), Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan, and Water Conservation Plan (WCP), as amended from time to time; and Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS-19-0001)for Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 Freeway Commercial North. The Project shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures specified in the ThirdAddendum to EIRMitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, as they relate to the Freeway CommercialSectional Planning Area Plan and Tentative Map Environmental Impact Report to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 7. The Applicantshall satisfy the requirements of the Parkland Dedication Ordinance (PDO) pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 17.10. The Ordinance establishesa requirement that the project provide (3) acres of local parks and related improvements per 1,000 residents. Local parks are comprised of community parks andneighborhood parks. The Applicant shall satisfy all of its park obligations in accordance with the First Amendment to Development Agreement for the project, or as amended from time to time. 8. Phasing approved with the SPA Plan may be amended subject to approval by the Director of Development Services and the City Engineer. th 9. Prior to the issuanceof the 530residentialBuilding Permit, the Applicant shall complete the Rezone of a 7.5 acre site in Village 7 for Community Purpose Facility (CPF), which includes the required 3.24 acres for Freeway Commercial North, to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 10.The Applicant may, at the discretion of the Development Services Director, enter into supplemental agreement(s) with the City, prior to approval of each Final Map for any phase or unit, whereby: 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1362 of 1481 Resolution No. 2019- Page 7 a. The City withholdsBuilding Permits for any units within the project site in order to have the project comply with the Growth Management Program; or, if any one of the following occur: i. Regional development threshold limits set by a Chula Vista transportation-phasing plan, as amended from time to time, have been reached. ii. Traffic volumes, level of service, public utilities and/or services either exceed the adopted City threshold standards or fail to comply with the then effective Growth Management Ordinance and Growth Management Program and any amendments thereto. iii. The Project’s required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP, or as amended or otherwise conditioned, have not been completed or constructed in accordance with the project entitlements including the Development Agreement to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director and the City Engineer. The Applicantmay propose changes in the timing and sequencing of development and the construction of improvements affected. In such case, the PFFP may be amended after review and approval by the City’s Director of Development Services and the City Engineer. The Developer agree(s) that the City may withhold Building Permits for any of the phases of development identified in the PFFP for the project if the project’s required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or in accordance with the Development Agreement are not meeting the City’s standard operating thresholds. Public facilitiesshall include, but not be limited to, air quality, drainage, sewer and water. 11.After final SPA approval, the Applicant shall submit electronic versions of all SPA documents, including text and graphics, to the Development Services Department in a format specified and acceptable to the Development Services Director. 12.The Applicant shall comply with the Fire Department’s codes and policies for Fire Prevention. As part of any submittal for design review, a fire access and water supply plan prepared by a licensed engineering firm, which has been determined to be qualified in the sole discretion of the Fire Marshall, shall be submitted for approval by the City of Chula Vista Fire Marshall. The plan shall detail how and when the Applicant shall provide the following items either prior to the issuance of Building Permit(s) for the project,or prior to delivery of combustible materials on any construction site on the project, whichever occurs earlier: a. Water supply consisting of fire hydrants as approved and indicated by the Fire Department during plan check to the satisfaction of the FireMarshall. Any temporary water supply source is subject to prior approval by the Fire Marshal. b. Emergency vehicle access consisting of a minimum first layer of hard asphalt surface or concrete surface, with a minimum standard width of 15 feet. c. Street signs installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Locations and identification of temporary street signs shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Fire Marshall. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1363 of 1481 Resolution No. 2019- Page 8 VI. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Government Code Section 66020(a) and failure to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, set aside, void or annual imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. VII.EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, at the sole expense of the Property Owner and/or Applicant, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the City’s Development Services Department. Failure to return the signed and stamped copy of this recorded document within 10 days of recordation shall indicate the Property Owner/Applicant’s desire that the project, and the corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without approval. _______________________________________________ Signature of Property OwnerDate _______________________________________________ Signature of Applicant Date VIII.CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, of if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, instituted and prosecute litigate or compel their compliance or seek damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by Applicant or successor in interest by the City approval of this Resolution. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1364 of 1481 Resolution No. 2019- Page 9 IX.INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by the Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the city so determines in its sole discretion, the resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and no further in force or in effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that based on the above-referenced Findings and Conditions of Approval, the City Council does hereby approve the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Plan and Master Precise PlanAmendmentas shown in Exhibits B and C and Attachment 7 on file in the office of the City Clerk. Presented by:Approved as to form by: __________________________________________________________ Kelly Broughton, FSALAGlen R. Googins Development Services DirectorCity Attorney 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1365 of 1481 Resolution No. 2019- Page 10 EXHIBIT “A” LOCATION MAP 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1366 of 1481 ORDINANCE NO. 2019- ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTSTOTHEOTAYRANCHFREEWAY COMMERCIALPLANNEDCOMMUNITYDISTRICT REGULATIONS FORTHE NORTHERLY FC-2 PORTION WHEREAS, the parcel, that is the subject matter of this Ordinance, is represented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for thepurpose of general description is located in the northern portion of Planning Area 12 of Otay Ranch; and WHEREAS, on November 16, 2017, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin & Sons (Applicant) requesting approval of amendments to the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (MPA 17-0011), including the PlannedCommunity District Regulations; and WHEREAS, the project is intended to ensure that the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Plan is prepared in accordance with the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) to implement the City of Chula Vista General Plan for Eastern Chula Vista to promote the orderly planning and long term phased development of the Otay Ranch GDP and to establish conditions, which will enable Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial to exist in harmony within the community; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Directorreviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan-Planning Area 12(FEIR 02 - 04) (SCH #1989010154), and has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has caused the preparationof a ThirdAddendum to FEIR 02- 04; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said amendmentsand notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, and the Planning Commission voted 6-1-0-0to recommend to the City Council approval of the subject amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Clerkset the time and place for ahearing on theproject, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1367 of 1481 WHEREAS,a duly noticed public hearing was heldbefore the City Councilof the City of Chula Vista to approve the project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vistadoeshereby order and ordain as follows: I.PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing and the Minutes and Resolutions resulting therefrom are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents, along with any documents submitted to the decision- makers, shall comprise the entire record of the proceedings. II.COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA Immediately prior to this action, the City Council reviewed and consideredthe Third Addendum to FEIR 02-04; III.ACTION The City Council hereby adopts an Ordinance approving the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Planned Community District Regulationson file at the office of the City Clerk,finding that they are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, theOtay Ranch GDPand all other applicable plans; as setforth in Resolution MPA 17-0011adopting the Freeway CommercialSPA PlanAmendment, and that the public necessity; convenience, general welfare andgood planning and zoning practice support their approval and implementation. IV.SEVERABILITY If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance,is for any reason held to be, invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional; by a courtof competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and suchinvalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity orenforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to anyother person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista herebydeclares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase ofthis Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections,sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid,unenforceable or unconstitutional. V.CONSTRUCTION The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement,not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinanceshall be construed in light of that intent. VI.EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from andafter its adoption. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1368 of 1481 VII. PUBLICATION The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance andshall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by:Approved as to form by: ____________________________________________ Kelly Broughton, FSALAGlen R. Googins Development Services DirectorCity Attorney 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1369 of 1481 ORDINANCE NO. _______ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,VILLAGE II TOWN CENTER, LLC AND SUNRANCH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLCFOR THE FREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH PORTIONOF OTAY RANCH PLANNING AREA 12 WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this Ordinance is identified in the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and commonly known as the Freeway Commercial North (or FC-2) portion of Otay Ranch Planning Area 12(Property); and WHEREAS, The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan -Planning Area 12(“FEIR 02-04”) (SCH#1989010154). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has caused the preparationof aThirdAddendum to FEIR 02-04; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said Development Agreement Amendment and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Propertyat least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, andthe Planning Commission voted 6-1-0-0to recommend to the City Council approval of the Development Agreement Amendment; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was scheduled before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista to consider adopting the Ordinance to approve the Development Agreement Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista does hereby order and ordain as follows: I.PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing and the Minutes and Resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents, along with any documents submitted to the decision-makers, shall comprise the entire record of the proceedings. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1370 of 1481 Ordinance No. _______________ Page 2 II.COMPLIANCE WITHCEQA The City Council hereby finds, based upon their independent review and judgement,that the adoption of the Ordinance approving the Development Agreement Amendment for the project, as described and analyzed in the Third Addendum to Final EIR 02-04, would have no new effects that were not examined in said Final EIR. III.CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN AND OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The City Council hereby finds that the proposed Development Agreement Amendmentis consistent with the City’s General Plan and Otay Ranch General Development Plan, both as amended. The Development Agreementand Development AgreementAmendment implement the General Plan and the Otay Ranch General Development Planby providing a comprehensive program to implement the Sectional Planning Area (SPA)Plan Amendment and Tentative Map. The plans provide design incorporating a mixture of land uses connected by a walkablesystem of public streets and pedestrian paths, neighborhoodparks and plazas, retail opportunities, and commercial activities designed to promote a safe pedestrian environment. The Freeway Commercial Northplan, including the number of residential units,number of hotel rooms, park acreage, and commercial mixed use area,is consistent with the General Plan and the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, as amended. IV.ACTION The City Council hereby adopts an Ordinance approving the Development Agreement Amendmentbetween the City of Chula Vista, Village II Town Center, LLC and SunRanch Capital Partners, LLC for the Freeway Commercial North portion of Otay Ranch Planning Area 12(a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk’s office), finding it consistent with the California Government Code, adopted City policies, the General Plan, and the Otay Ranch General Development Plan. V.SEVERABILITY If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1371 of 1481 Ordinance No. _______________ Page 3 VI. CONSTRUCTION The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. VII.EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. VIII. PUBLICATION The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be publishedor posted according to law. Presented by:Approved as to form by: ___________________________________________________ Kelly Broughton, FSALAGlen R. Googins Development Services DirectorCity Attorney 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1372 of 1481 Attachment 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY ACREAGE FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND OTAY PROJECT, L.P I.RECITALS WHEREAS, an Agreement titled “AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY PURPOSE FACILITY ACREAGE FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO” between the City of Chula Vista and Otay Project L.P., a California limited partnership (“OPLP”) was executed on August 22, 2012 pursuant to County Recorder’s Office Document # 2012- 0722469 dated November 19, 2012; and WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this Resolutionis identified in the Community Purpose Facility (CPF) agreement (CPF Agreement) attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and is commonly known as Village Two of Otay Ranch and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 775acres located south of Olympic Parkway, west of LaMedia Road and to the east and west of HeritageRoad(Project Site); and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista and Otay Project, L.P. would like to change the provision of the Agreement regarding the trigger for the delivery of the CPFAcreagefrom a fixed number of units to 75 percent of the total number of units to be constructed in Village 2; and WHEREAS, The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in the previously adopted Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (“FSEIR 12-01”) (SCH#2003091012). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has caused the preparation of a Third Addendum to FSEIR 12-01; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said Amendment to the CPF Agreement and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1373 of 1481 Resolution 2019-_______Page 2of 2 WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, and the Planning Commission voted 6-1-0-0 to recommend to the City Council approval of the First Amendment to the CPF Agreement for Village Two; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was scheduled before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista to consider adopting the Resolution to approve the First Amendment to the CPF Agreement for Village Two. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: II.COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council hereby finds, based upon their independent review and judgement, that the adoption of the Resolution approving the First Amendment to the CPF Agreement for Village Two, as described and analyzed in the Third Addendum toFSEIR 12-01, would have no new effects that were not examined in said Final Supplemental EIR. III.CONSISTENCYWITH GENERAL PLAN AND OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The City Council finds that the proposed First Amendment to the CPF Agreement is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Otay Ranch General Development Plan, both as amended. IV.ACTION The City Council hereby adopts a Resolution approving the Amendment to the CPF Agreement (a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk’s office), finding it consistentwith the California Government Code, adopted City policies, the General Plan, and the Otay Ranch General Development Plan. Presented by:Approved as to form by: _________________________________________ Kelly Broughton, FASLAGlen R. Googins Development Services DirectorCity Attorney 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1374 of 1481 RESOLUTION NO. 2019- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CVT 19- 0001FOR OTAY RANCH PLANNING AREA 12 FREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH I.RECITALS 1.Project Site WHEREAS, the parcel, that is the subject matter of this Resolution, is represented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose ofgeneral description is located in the northern portion of Planning Area 12 ofOtay Ranch; and 2.Project; Applications for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on January 9, 2019, a duly verified application for a Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS-19-0001) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Departmentby Baldwin & Sons(Applicant); to allocate the additional 300 units to R/MU land use district. The Tentative Subdivision Map creates608 residentialcondominium units, 10 commercial lots and 1,049 parking condominium unitson 10.405 acres of land;and 3.Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Development Services Directorreviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has determined that the project was covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan-Planning Area 12(FEIR 02 -04) (SCH #1989010154), and has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has caused the preparationof a ThirdAddendum to FEIR 02-04; and 4.Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, a public hearing time and place was set by the Planning Commission for said Tentative Subdivision Map and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, a hearing at the time and place as advertised, was held before the Planning Commission in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, and said hearing was thereafter closed; and 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1375 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered theTentative Subdivision Map PCS-19-0001; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission,after considering all evidence and testimony presented,by a vote of 6-1-0-0recommends that the City of Chula Vista City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map CVT 19-0001for Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 Freeway Commercial North in Conjunction with the PA-12 Sectional Planning Area (SPA)Plan Amendment; and 5.City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set by the City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista for consideration of the Tentative Subdivision Mapand notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Tentative Subdivision Mapat the time and place as advertised in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby findand determine as follows: II. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the following: 1. Land Use The General Plan (GP) land use designation isRetail Commercial and Mixed Use Residential. The proposed project is consistent with these land use designation. The current Otay Ranch General Development Plan(GDP) designation is Freeway Commercial and Mixed Use. The proposed project is consistent with these land use designation. The existing implementing zone in the Freeway Commercial Planned Community District Regulations is FC-2, which is divided into twosubcategories: R/MU (Residential/Mix-Use)and C/MU (Commercial/Mixed Use). Allneighborhoods, as shown on the Tentative Subdivision Map, are consistent with these designations. In total, this Tentative Subdivision Mapdepicts 608 residential units. The subdivision design creates608 residential condominium units, 10 commercial lots and 1,049 parking condominium units on two (2) lots, and one (1) private street. The 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1376 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 3 proposed project furthers the policy objective for “Urban Villages”to have “higher densities and mixed uses in the village cores”and to "provide a wide range of residential housing opportunities” which promotes a blend of for-sale and for-rent housing products and a range of densities integrated and compatible with other land uses in the area. The proposed project would support Smart Growth Principles, as it provides compact development oriented to pedestrians, bicyclists and transit, and would further minimize urban sprawl development patterns. 3.Circulation All off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision already exist. The on-site privatestreet isdesigned in accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements and providesfor vehicular and pedestrian connections. 4.Economic Development The proposed project results in an increase of 300residential units. There is aprovision of a wider range of housingoptions and pricing for potential home-buyers and renters in the current housing market. Byadding these units, increased patronage to the nearby commercial and public/quasi-publicuses can be anticipated to contribute to greater economic development withinPlanning Area 12and the City. The Project allows for development of multi-family housing. The Project provides homebuyers the opportunity topurchase homes with greater affordability, reduced maintenance/utility costs, and less dependency on the automobile, a guiding principal of the Otay Ranch GDP. The proposed homes also provide further variation inhousing opportunities available to Chula Vista residents, consistent with General Plan (GP) Objective ED 2.The proposed project also fosters economic development benefits at the communitylevel by providing for increased housing densities within the same developmentfootprint. These increased densities allow for infrastructure and municipal services tobe provided at reduced cost per capita (more people served by the same municipalservices). Additionally, with increased housing (and population) within the samedevelopment footprint, increased densities improve the viability of community serving commercial and public/quasi-public uses as well as alternative transportation modes. As a result, the proposed project may serve as a catalyst for small and midsized industries and businesses and community serving and neighborhood uses,consistent with GP Objectives ED 3 and ED 9. 5.Public Facilities The project has been conditioned to ensure that all necessary public facilities and services will be available to serve the project concurrent with the demand for those services. A Supplemental Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP)has been prepared to analyze the demand generated by 300 new residential units for public services and facilities, and the phasing needs created by the project. Storm Water: Otay Ranch FC-2 project existing conditions and proposed drainage improvements are identified in the “Otay Ranch Planning Area 12, Drainage Study,” dated October 7, 2014, by Hunsaker & Associates. The Hunsaker Drainage Study identifies the Pre-Development and Post-Development Conditions flow rates for 50- 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1377 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 4 year and 100-year storm events; the required size of the proposed storm drain facilities needed to route the expected runoff through the developed site; and a capacity analysis and recommendation for the existing storm drain capacity once the site is developed. A Drainage Report and a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) were prepared by SB&O Inc. on August 8, 2018 for the east portion of FC-2. The current project storm water quality conditions and proposed water quality improvements are identified in three reports. Each report focuses on a specific area within FC-2 and includes: The Hotel Site:Water Quality Technical Report (Major WQTR) for Otay Ranch Village 12, PA-12 West Residential October 20, 2014by Hunsaker & Associates. The Eastern Residential area: “A Drainage Report and a SWQMP”, August 8, 2018 by SB&O Inc. The Western Residential area: Water Quality Technical Report (Major WQTR) for Otay Ranch Village 12, PA-12 West Residential December 31, 2015by Hunsaker & Associates. The Hunsaker WQTR’s and SB&O SWQMPhave been prepared to implement the methods and procedures as described in the City of Chula Vista Storm Water Manual and Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for Best Management Practices (BMP)design. The treatment of the runoff from the project is addressed in the WQTR. Theproposed design will utilize on-site Low Impact Development (LID), BMPs and Bioretention Integrated Management Practices (IMP’s) Treatment Controls to treat the 85th percentile flow from the development. The FC-2 project is under the jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB). The FC-2 project is subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements both during and after construction. NPDES requirements stem from the Federal Clean Water Act and are enforced either by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) or the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for the region in which the project is located. The City of Chula Vista BMP Design ManualMarch 2019 update to the December 2015Manual, addresses the onsite post-construction storm water requirements for Standard Projects and Priority Development Projects (PDPs) and provides procedures for planning, preliminary design, selection, and design of permanent storm water BMPs based on the performance standards as required by the Municipal Storm Water Permit for the San Diego Region \[Order No. R9-2013-0001 as amended by R9-2015-0001 and R9-2015-0100\]. All development projects must comply with the requirements. Wastewater: The project is consistent with Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) Mitigation Measures 5.12-11 through 5.12-13, which require the Applicant to demonstrate adequate capacity in the Poggi Canyon sewer line. The sewer technical study (Dexter 2019) demonstrates that there is adequate sewer capacity in the existing 8-inch line that serves the site. The existing 8-inch gravity sewer line is adequate to convey this projected total flow. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1378 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 5 Potable Water Demand: As the subject matter of a GP and GDP amendment (Resolution No.2015-114), the property was included in a water supply assessment, which was approved for the project on April 1, 2015. It documentsthat there is an assured long term supply of water for the project. This report estimated that the project would require a supply of 233 AFY to meet thedemands of the project and concluded that the Otay Water District (OWD)could meet these demands. After the 2015 WSAV report was approved, OWD updated the water demand factors that are used to estimate demands from future development. Due to the success of water conservation efforts in the region and corresponding reductions to OWD water demand factors, the current demand for the proposed Freeway Commercial project amendment is 217 AFY, or 16 AFY less than the project that was approved in 2015. This reduction in water demand projections by OWD is consistent with what the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA)reports region wide where their supply of water to the San Diego region was less in 2016 than it was in 1990, despite an increase in the population and number of residences. 6.Environmental Element The proposed project has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of the CEQAand it was determined that the project was covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan -Planning Area 12(FEIR 02-04) (SCH#1989010154).A Water Quality Technical Report, Traffic Impact Study, Noise Impact Report, Air Quality and Global Climate Change Evaluation, Sewer Service Technical Memorandumand Water Service Technical Memorandumhave been prepared, reviewed and approved by Citystaff. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has caused the preparationof a Third Addendum to FEIR 02-04. 7.Growth Management The proposed project willresult in 300 new dwelling units in Freeway Commercial North. ASupplemental PFFP has been prepared which analyzes any potential impacts onpublic facilitiesand services, and identifies the facilities, phasing and timing triggers for the provision of facilities and services to serve the project, consistent with theCity's Quality of Life Threshold Standards. In response to a previous change in the FC-2 District portion of the project, an analysis was prepared entitled Otay Ranch PA12 –Trip Generation Review –Revised by Chen- Ryan Associates, dated 2015. This report was the basis of the First Addendum to the EIR. The First Addendumconcluded that “the FC-2 site would generate approximately 7,506 daily trips, which is lower than the entitled land use trip generation of approximately 12,145 daily trips for the FC-2 site. Since the proposed modified land uses would generate less traffic than the entitled land uses, there areno additional traffic impacts associated with the proposed modifications.” 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1379 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 6 When the land use changed from Commercial to Mixed-Use in the FC-2 portion of the project, an analysis was prepared entitled “Otay Ranch PA 12 Trip Generation Review –Revised” by Chen Ryan Associates, dated 2015. This report was the basis of the First Addendum to the EIR. The First Addendumconcluded that the hotel and mixed-use land uses would generate less daily and peak hour trips than the entitled Freeway Commercial uses, there would be no significant traffic impacts associated with the land use change and thus no additional traffic analysis would be required. The updated Traffic Memorandum by Chen Ryan dated January 2019 concluded that with the addition of 300 units, the project will still generate fewer trips than the original Freeway Commercial uses would generate. According to the January 2019 memorandum (Chen Ryan 2019), the FC-2 site would generate approximately 7,681 daily trips, which is lower than the originally approved commercial land use trip generation of approximately 12,145 daily trips for the FC-2 site. As analyzed in the traffic memorandum, there is a reduction in PM peak hour trips (by 524 trips) and an increase in AM peak hour trips (by 58 trips) but would not result in any new significant traffic impacts during the Existing PlusProject or Horizon (Year 2030) conditions. Theproject access isvia two driveways along Town Center Drive and one driveway along Olympic Parkway, between Town Center Drive and Eastlake Parkway (right in/rightout).The analysis indicates that both intersections of Town Center Drive / Olympic Parkway and Town Center Drive / Town Center Loop would continue to operate at acceptable LOS D or better with addition of the project traffic. All three proposed project driveways would operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Existing Plus Project conditions. The addition of project traffic would not result in any traffic impact within the project study area. The analysis also indicates that the Year 2030 geometrics of the project are adequate to accommodate the projected Average Daily Traffic (ADT). The project site is within the boundaries of the Chula Vista Elementary SchoolDistrict (CVESD)and within theSweetwater Union High School District (SUHSD).At completion, the proposed project could generate approximately 463students. The Applicantwill mitigate impacts on secondary and elementary school facilities through participation in CVESD and SUHSD Community FacilityDistricts (CFDs). 8.Open Space and Conservation The proposed project meets the minimum open space requirement in accordance with the Freeway Commercial SPA Plan and Planned Community District Regulations. The project generates ademand of 2.36 acres of park landfor the additional 300 units. Pursuant to the Development Agreement between the Applicant and the City of Chula Vista, this obligation will be met through the payment of a Park Benefit Fee as described in the DevelopmentAgreement. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1380 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 7 The Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan (RMP) requires conveyance of 1.188 acres of land to the Otay Ranch Preserve for every one-acre of developed land prior to the recordation of any Final Map. In association with the original Final Map for this Project, Map 16291, 40.761 acres were conveyed to the Otay Ranch Preserve Owner Manager via recorded Open Space Easement Doc# 2018-0325995. Since the project dedicated Multi-species Conservation Plan (MSCP) open space preserve lands prior to recordation of the original Final Map, the project is consistent with the requirements of the Otay Ranch RMP and MSCP Subarea Plan. The proposed land form grading conforms to the City's Grading Ordinance and retains regional and natural open space features. The development of the site is consistentwith the goals and policies of the Conservation Element. 9.Safety The City Engineer, Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety policies and have determined that the proposal meets those standards. 10.Noise The project has been reviewed for compliance with the Noise Element and will comply with applicable noise measures at the time of issuance of a Building Permit. B.Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, the configuration, orientation, and topography of the site allows for the optimum siting of lots for natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities and that the development of the site will be subject to site plan and architectural review to insure the maximum utilization of natural and passive heating and cooling opportunities. C.Pursuant to Government Code Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council hereby certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. D.Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474 (a)-(g) of the Subdivision Map Act, the proposed Project: (a) is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 because the General Plan designation Freeway Commercial (28-45 dwelling units per acre) allows for a maximum of 608units/lots and the project proposes 3lots. The project is within a SPA/Specific Plan area. (b) design or improvement is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. The Project’s design of 3 lots is consistent with the Freeway Commercial, (FC-2) zoning classification which is consistent with the General Plan’s Freeway Commercial designation. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1381 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 8 (c) site is suitable for the proposed density of development. The project’s 3 lots are below the allowed density range of 27-45 dwelling units per acres with a maximumyield of 608 units/lots. (d) site is physically suitable for the type of development. The project is surrounded by multi-family and commercial development with available access and infrastructure to serve the project. (e) the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project has been designed to minimize landform disturbance with cut and fill slopes balance,and on a disturbed site thatavoids permanent disturbance or injury to wildlife or their habitat. (f) the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems because the project has been designed to have plenty of separation between homes, able to be served by fire and emergency services, and located over 500 feet from a major highway. (g) subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the governing body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project’s roadways and utilities are within and are not in conflict with existing easements. E.The site is physically suited for residential development because it is generally level and is located adjacent to existing residential developments. The project conforms to all standards established by the City for a residential development. F.The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. III. TENTATIVEMAP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless otherwise specified or required by law,the conditions and Chula VistaMunicipal Code (“CVMC” or “Municipal Code”) requirements setforth below shall be completed prior to the related Final Map as determined by the DevelopmentServices Director and the City Engineer, or their designees. Unless otherwise specified, “dedicate” means grant the appropriate easement, rather than fee title. Where an easement is required the Applicant shall berequired to provide subordination of any prior lien and easement holders in order to ensure thatthe City has a first priority interest and rights in such land unless otherwise 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1382 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 9 excused by the City.Where fee title is granted or dedicated to the City, said fee title shall be free and clear of allencumbrances, unless otherwise excused by the City. Should conflicting wording or standards occurbetween these conditions of approvaland any other entitlement document, any conflictshall be resolved by the City Manager or designee. 1.The Applicant, or his/her successors in interest, shall develop and maintain the project site in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, floor plans, and elevation planson file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Title 19. 2.The project shall comply with approved General Plan Amendment GPA-12-03,General Development Plan Amendment PCM-12-15, Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan PCM 12-16, and Tentative Subdivision Map, Tract05-02and all supporting documents including but not limited to the Public Facilities Finance Plan, Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan, Affordable Housing Plan,Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan, Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water Conservation Plan,Fire Protection Plan and the City of Chula Vista Standard Tentative Map Conditions, as attached hereto, or on file in the Development Services Department,and incorporated herein. 3.The Applicant shall pay in full any unpaid balance for the project, including Deposit Account No. DDA0384. 4.The Applicant shall implement, to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director and the City Engineer, the mitigation measures identified in the FinalEnvironmental Impact Report (FEIR 02-04); Third Addendum to FEIR 02-04and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the project, within the timeframe specified in the MMRP. 5.The Applicant shall submitCovenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s)for review and approval prior to approval of the Final Map. Said CC&R’s shallinclude the following: a. Indemnification of City for private sewer spillage. b. Listing of maintained private facilities. c. The City’s right but not the obligation to enforce the CC&R’s d. Provision that no private facilities shall be requested to become public unless all homeowners and 100% of the first mortgage obligee have signed a written petition. e. Maintenance of all walls, fences, lighting structures, paths, recreational amenities and structures, sewage facilities, drainage structures and landscaping. f. Implement education and enforcement program to prevent the discharge of pollutants from all on-site sources to the storm water conveyance system. 6.Said CC&R’s shall be consistent with CVMC Chapter 18.44, the Subdivision Ordinance, and shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1383 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 10 7.The CC&R’s for each Homeowners Association (HOA)within the project shall contain a provision that provides all new residents with an overflight disclosure document that discloses the following information during any real estate transaction or prior to lease signing, as required by the Brown Field ALUCP: NOTICE OF AIRPORT VICINITY: This property is presently located in the vicinity of an airport, within what is known as an airport influence area. For that reason,the property may be subject to some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated with proximity to airport operations (for example: noise, vibration, or odors). Individual sensitivities to those annoyances can vary from person to person. You may wish to consider what airport annoyances, if any, are associated with the property before you complete your purchase or lease and determine whether they are acceptable to you. A copy of the abovedisclosure document shall be recorded with the San Diego County Recorder’s Office and a conformed copy submitted to the City of Chula Vista as part of project approval. Each prospective homeowner shall sign the disclosure document confirming they have been informed of the vicinity of the airport prior to the purchase or lease of a home. 8.The Applicant shall obtain approval of a subsequent Final Map showing condominium ownership prior to development of condominiums within any Planning Area proposing mixed residential/commercial or multi-family residential uses. Ownership of individual parking condominium units must be in compliance with the parking requirements of the PC District Regulations of the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area Plan (PC District Regulations). Residential or Commercial condominium units must at all times be in compliance with the parking requirements of the PC District Regulations through direct ownership of the parking condominium units required or legal rights to use the required parking condominium units such as through a recorded shared parking agreementapproved by the DevelopmentServices Director. 9.The Applicant shall construct public facilities in compliance with the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial SPA Public Facilities Finance Plan (as amended from time to time) as specified in the Threshold Compliance and Recommendations Section for each public facility chapter. At the Applicant’s request, the City Engineer and Development Services Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence, schedule, alignment and design of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. 10.Prior to approval of any Final Map, the Applicant shall present verification to the City Engineer in theform of a letter from the OtayWater District that the subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long-term water storage facilities. 11.Prior to approval of anyFinal Map or Grading Plan for the project, the Engineer-of-Work shall submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer a waiver request for all subdivision design items not specifically waived on the Tentative Map, and not conforming to adopted City standards. The Engineer-of-work request shall outline the requested subdivision 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1384 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 11 design deviations from adopted City standards and state that in his/her professional opinion, no safety issues will be compromised. The waiver is subject to approval by the City Engineer in the City Engineer's sole discretion. 12.Prior to approval of any Construction Permit, the Applicant shall ensure that all emergency access roads are designed with a Traffic Index of 5 and constructed out of concrete or as approved by the City Engineer. Grading: 13.Grading plans that include freestanding walls or sound walls adjacent to 2:1 or greater slopes more than 6 feet high shall include a minimum 2 ft. wide level bench for landscaping and maintenance access adjacent to the wall. 14.Prior to City acceptance of any landscaped areas, the Applicant shall install permanent water meters in accordance with the approved landscape and irrigation plans to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 15.Prior to issuance of any Grading Permit, the Applicant shall ensure that all earthwork shall balance to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director and the City Engineer. 16.Prior to the issuance of any Construction or Grading Permit which impacts offsite property, the Applicant shall deliver to the Development Services Directorand City Engineer, a notarized letter of permission to construct or grade and drain for all off-site grading. 17.Prior to issuance of any Grading or Construction Permit based on plans proposing the creation of down slopes adjacent to public or private streets, the Applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s approval of a study todetermine the necessity of providing guardrail improvements at those locations. The Applicant shall construct and secure any required guardrail improvements in conjunction with the associated Construction Permit as determined by and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The guardrail shall be installed per CalTrans Traffic Manual and Roadside Design Guide requirements and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 18.The Applicant shall ensure that all private lot drainage and slopes comply with the current Building Code used by the City of Chula Vista Sewer: 19. All gravity sewers shall be designed to convey peak wet weather flow. For pipes with a diameter of 12 inches and smaller, the sewers will be designed to convey this flow when 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1385 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 12 flowing half full. All new sewers shall be designed to maintain a minimum velocity of two feet per second (fps) at design capacity to prevent the deposition of solids. 20. Prior to each Final Map the Applicantshall either demonstrate that Poggi Sewer has adequate capacity or upsize the inadequate segment, all to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services and the City Engineer. 21. Upon Tentative Mapapproval, or as required by the Development Services Director, the Applicant shall fund updates of the Poggi Canyon Sewer Development Impact fee (DIF) to include the project’s proposed additional units. Further, the Applicantshall agree not to protest the update of the Poggi Canyon Sewer DIF. Parks: 22.The Applicant shall pay a Park Benefit Fee (which is equal to the City’s PAD fee at the time of payment) to the City for all additional 300 residential units constructed in FC-2 in accordance with the “First Amendment to the Development Agreement between the City of Chula Vista, Village II Town Center, LLC and Sunranch Capital Partners, LLC.”Park Benefit Fees may be utilized by the City to acquire or develop parkland serving the City’s eastern territories. Traffic: 23.The Applicant shall comply with all the requirements of the “Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial North Traffic Analysis”by ChenRyan,datedApril 2019. 24.Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit for the East Mixed-Use, a signal at Town Center Drive and Promenade St. shall be constructed as shown as #4 in Table C.2. 25.Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, the street improvementsalong Town Center Drive,in accordance with Drawing No. 16039shall be completedto the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Director of Development Services. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the project site as long as it relies onthis approval: 1.Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with anysections of the Chula Vista Municipal Codenor any other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 2.The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, Planning Commission members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval of this Tentative Map, (b) City’s actions on any environmental document concerning this 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1386 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 13 Tentative Mapand (c) City’s approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the project site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge theiragreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Resolutionwhere indicated below. The Property Owner’s and Applicant’s compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner’s and Applicant’s successors and assigns. 3.All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Applicantas to any or all of the property. 4.The Applicant shall comply with all requirements and guidelines of the City of Chula Vista General Plan; the City’s Growth Management Ordinance; Chula Vista Landscape Manual, Chula Design Plan; Otay Ranch General Development Plan, Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan, Phase 1 and Phase 2; Ranch Wide Affordable Housing Plan; Otay Ranch Overall Design Plan; Otay Ranch Freeway CommercialSectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and supporting documents including: Public Facilities Finance Plan and supplemental PFFP; Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan; Affordable Housing Plan and the Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan as amended from time to time, unless specifically modified by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager. These plans may be subject to minor modifications by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager, however, any material modifications shall be subject to approval by the City Council. 5.If any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur or ifthey are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted including issuance of building permits, deny, or further condition the subsequent approvals that are derived from the approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions; and/or seek damages for their violation. The applicant shall be notified 10 days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City. 6.The applicant shall comply with all applicable Freeway CommercialSPA conditions of approval, (MPA19-0011)as may be amended from time to time. IV. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Government Code Section 66020(a) and failure to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, set aside, void or annual imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1387 of 1481 City Council Resolution No. 2019- Page 14 or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or otherexactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. V.EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, at the sole expense of the Property Owner and/or Applicant, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the City’s Development Services Department. Failure to return the signed and stamped copy of this recorded document within 10 days of recordation shall indicate the Property Owner/Applicant’s desire that the project, and the corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without approval. __________________________________________ _____ Signature of Property OwnerDate _______________________________________________ Signature of Applicant Date VI.CONFORMANCE WITH CITY SUBDIVISION MANUAL The City Council does hereby find that the project is in conformance with the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual, CVMC Chapter 18.12 and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. VII.INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision, and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, this Resolution and the permit shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does, based on the findings, general and specific conditions included herein,hereby approve Tentative Subdivision Map CVT-19-0001for Otay Ranch Planning Area 12 Freeway Commercial North in conjunction with the PA-12 SPAPlan Amendment. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1388 of 1481 Presented by:Approved as to form by: _______________________________________________ Kelly Broughton, FSALAGlen R. Googins Development Services DirectorCityAttorney 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1389 of 1481 RESOLUTION __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVINGADESIGN REVIEW PERMIT DR17-0037TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 578-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX, 15,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL USE, TWO INTEGRATED PARKING STRUCTURESON TWO LOTS CONSISTING OF 10.4 ACRESLOCATED IN THE OTAY RANCHFREEWAY COMMERCIALNORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD PA-12 I.RECITALS WHEREAS, on November 6, 2017, a duly verified application for a Design Review Permit was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin & Sons, LLC (Applicant); and WHEREAS, the application requests approval of a Design Review Permit to allow construction of a mixed-use project consisting of 578 residential apartments, 15,000 square feet of retail uses, two integrated parking structures on two lots consisting of 10.4 acres(Project); and WHEREAS, the Design Review application implements the Freeway Commercial North SPA Plan Design Guidelines and Master Precise Plan; and WHEREAS, staff recommends that, based upon the findings made, the City Council approve the Design Review application DR17-0037; and WHEREAS, The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Project was adequately covered in previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan -Planning Area 12(FEIR 02-04) (SCH#1989010154). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has caused the preparationof a Third Addendum to FEIR 02-04; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Design Reviewrequestand notices of said hearing, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailings to property ownerswithin 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the project siteat least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly called and notified public hearing on the Design Review was heard before the City Council in the City CouncilChambers in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1390 of 1481 Resolution No. ______ Page 2 II.DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS/APPROVAL NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councilof the City of ChulaVista that it hereby makes the following findings: 1.That the proposed project is consistent with thedevelopment regulations of the Freeway Commercial NorthSectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Planned Community (PC) District Regulations. Neighborhood R/MUis designated Residential Multi-Family/Mixed-Use(R/MU) in the PC District regulations of the Freeway Commercial NorthSPA Plan. The proposed multi-family and retail mixed-use is permitted and meets all of the development regulations as stipulated in the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial North PC District Regulations as conditioned. The allowable density on the site is a total of 608units. The Applicant is proposing to build a total of 578unitsin two separate buildings. Each building includes interior parkingin addition to guest parking. The project requires 444parking spaces, and provides 497 spaceswithin building A; and 572 required with 597 provided in building B. The maximum allowable building height is 85feet and the project proposes 58-feet for the majority with 84 feet at the highest point for the project features (i.e. towers). The lot area, floor area ratio, and setback requirements are subject to Design Review (DR). The site was intended for a mixed-use within a larger commercialserving a regional market as well as providing residential homes in close proximity. The commercial retail use, as proposed, will serve a local market demand, in addition to the demand of visitors to the Chula Vista area. 2. That the proposed project is consistent with the design and development standards of the Freeway Commercial NorthSPA Design Planand Master Precise Plan. The Project is in compliance with the Multi-Family/Mixed UseFreeway Commercial North SPA Design Plan, and is consistent with the SPA density requirements. Enhanced architectural details are proposed along the street elevations and the layout of the site. Outdoor recreational areas for the residentsand a plaza area areprovided in front of the retail shopswhich provides for a pedestrian oriented design in accordance with the Otay Ranch Freeway Commercial North SPA Plan.A total of 1,016 parking spaces are required. The project proposes 1,065 spaces. The total building height is five stories, 58-feet. The lot coverage and setback requirement are subject to Design Review (DR). 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1391 of 1481 Resolution No. ______ Page 3 III.CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director, or designee, prior to issuance of Building Permits, unless otherwise specified: Development Planning Division 1.The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, floor plan, and elevation plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Title 19. 2.Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for deposit account DDA-0092. 3.The colors and materials specified on the building plans must be consistent with the colors and materials shown on the site plan and materials board approved by the City Council. 4.A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for all first floor wall and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Additionally, the Project shall conform to Section 9.20.055 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) regarding graffiti control. 5.All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design. 6.All ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping. 7.All exterior lighting shall include shielding to remove any glare from adjacent residents. Details for said lighting shall be included in the architectural plans. 8.The Applicant shall provide a bus stop along Olympic Parkway in accordance with the Metropolitan Transit System requirement. Land Development Division/Landscape Architecture Division The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or designee, 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1392 of 1481 Resolution No. ______ Page 4 prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, unless otherwise specified: 9.The Applicant shall be required to pay Engineering Fees based on the final approved building plans for the project. Sewer Connection and Capacity Fee Traffic Signal Fee Public Facilities Development Impact Fees(PFDIF) 10.The Applicant shall satisfy all of its park obligations in accordance with the First Amendment to Development Agreement for the Project, or as amended from time to time. 11.All driveways shall conform to the City of Chula Vista’s sight distance requirements in accordance with Section 12.12.130 of the CVMC.Also, landscaping, street furniture, or signs shall not obstruct the visibility of a driver at the street intersections or driveways. 12.The Applicant shall provide a circulation analysis demonstrating: a. Solid Waste Truck Movements. b. How cars can turn around when pulling out from the garage. c. Location of visitor parking. 13.The driveway within the complex shall be designated as private. 14.On May 2013, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Diego Region reissued (SDRWQCB) a municipal storm water, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Order No. R9-2013-0001 and as amended by Order Nos R9-2015-0001 & R9-2015-0100 \[MS4 Permit\]) that covered its region. 15.The Project shall comply with all requirements of the MS4 Permit and City of Chula Vista Best Management Practices (BMP)Design Manual, April 2019and as amended (BMP Design Manual) for both construction and post-construction phases of the Project. Prior to Planning approval, documentation shall be provided, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, to demonstrate such compliance. The BMP Design Manual is available on the City of Chula Vista website at: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/public-works/services/storm- water-pollution-prevention/documents-and-reports. 16.The Applicant is required to complete and submit the Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklist for All Permit Applications with any Planning Application request. 17.The following referenced forms shall be completed, signed by the owner, submitted to and approved by Land Development Division. A Form can be found at the following link: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=12085 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1393 of 1481 Resolution No. ______ Page 5 -“Storm Water Quality Management Plan, SWQMP for Standard Projects” -“Construction Storm Water Pollution Control Plan CSWPCP, for standard Project” 18.Prior to the approval of the grading plans, the Applicant shall execute a Storm Water Facilities Maintenance Agreement with Grant of Access and Covenants with the City for the proposed BMPs for the site. 19.Prior to obtaining any Building Permit for the Project, or approval of the Final Map (whichever occurs first), if the Project’s total on-site improvements exceed Engineering Threshold of (currently: $57,653.00), per CVMC, Section 12.24.020, then the Applicant shall be required to obtain a Construction Permit from the Land Development Section of the Department of Development Services. (The On-Site Improvements Trigger for Installation of Public Improvements is adjusted on an annual basis on July 1 based on the Engineer Construction Cost Index, See Attachment). A Construction Permit is required to perform the following work in the City’s right-of-way, which may include, but is not limited to: (For Commercial, Industrial and Multifamily Residential, the following applies: 1. Limits the cost of reconstructing existing street improvements to meet current standards to 25%of the building permit valuation. 2. Requires Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) pedestrian improvements in the right of way, if any are lacking or substandard. The required ADA improvements would be limited to 20% of the building permit valuation.) a.Installation of a driveway(s) meeting design standards as shown in Chula Vista standard detail CVCS-1B. Dedication of R/W as needed in order for driveway to comply with American Disability Act (ADA) requirements. b.Utilities Trenching and Restoration shall be installed in accordance with CVCS-3 & 4 20.Separate permits for other public utilities (gas, electric, water, cable, telephone) shall be required, as necessary. 21.The construction and completion of all improvements and release requirements shall be secured in accordance with Section 18.16.180 of the Municipal Code. 22.The Applicant shall clearly show the existing and proposed sanitary sewer lines and how the site will connect to the City’s public sewage system. No sewer lines will be allowed to be located under existing or proposed buildings. The Applicant shall indicate whether sewer lines are private or public. 23.Sewer lateral and storm drain connections to existingpublic utilities-The Public Works Operations Section will need to inspect any existing sewer laterals and connections that are to be used by the new development. Laterals and connections may need replacement as a result of this inspection. 24.The onsite sewer and storm drain system shall be private. All sewer laterals and storm drains shall be privately maintained from each building unit to the City-maintained public facilities. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1394 of 1481 Resolution No. ______ Page 6 25.All proposed sidewalks, walkways, pedestrian ramps, and disabled parking shall be designed to meet the City of Chula Vista Design Standards, American Disability Act (ADA) Standards, and Title 24 standards, as applicable. 26.Any private facilities (if applicable) within Public right-of-way or City easement will require an Encroachment Permit prior to improvement plan or Building Permit approval. 27.All utilities serving the subject property and existing utilities located within or adjacent to the subject property shall be under grounded in accordance with the applicable Chula Vista Municipal Code Section. Further, all new utilities serving the subject property shall be under grounded prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 28.The Applicant shall submit full landscape and irrigation plans for review and approval by the City’s Landscape Architect. The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City Fire Marshall or designee, prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, unless otherwise specified: Fire Department 29.The Applicant shall apply for required Building Permits. Permits shall comply with applicable codes and requirements, including but not limited to: the current California edition of Building Code (CBC), Fire Code (CFC), Mechanical Code, and Residential Code as adopted and amended by the State of California and the City of Chula Vista. 30.For 313,019 square feet of Type VA/IA construction, this project will require a fire flow of 5,880 gallons per minute for a 4-hour duration at 20 p.s.i. 31.Based upon the required fire flow for Type VA/IA construction type, a minimum of8 fire hydrants are required to serve this Project. 32.Where a portion of the building is more than400feet from a fire hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building, on site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. 33.Fire Hydrants shall be located and spaced in accordance with California Fire Code, Appendix C. 34.A fire service study shall be performed that includes a hydraulic waterflow analysis. This analysis shall show the actual flow and pressure for all hydrants and riser stubs. The Hazen Williams formula shall be used in the determination of these flows and pressures. The analysis shall show that the required fire flow is available at the hydrants and that independently the sprinkler demand is available at the most demanding sprinkler riser. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1395 of 1481 Resolution No. ______ Page 7 35.Water supply data is required to accompany an underground submittal. An official water flow letter can be obtained from the respective water authority. The water flow requirements shall be based upon the currently adopted California Fire Code. The date of the water flow test shall be no older than six months from the time of the plan submittal. 36.Buildings shall be provided with Knox appliances. Provide in accordance with Multi- tenantstandard detail (one required at each business suite). Provide a Knox Vault at the main entrance to the building Provide a Knox Box at the Fire control Room 37.The building(s) shall be addressed in accordance with the following criteria: 0 –50ft from the building to the face of the curb = 6-inches in height with a 1-inch stroke 51 –150ft from the building to the face of the curb = 10-inches in height with a 1 ½ -inch stroke 151ft from the building to the face of the curb = 16-inches in height with a 2-inch stroke 38.This Project is to be protected throughout by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 39.This Project is to be protected throughout by an approved fire alarm system IV.The following on-going conditions shall apply to the project site as long as it relies on thisapproval: 1.Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the CVMC, and any other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 2.The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, Planning Commission members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City’s actions on any environmental document concerning this Project, (b) approval of this Design Reviewand (c) City’s approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the project site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Resolution where indicated below. The Property Owner’s and Applicant’s compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner’s and Applicant’s successors and assigns. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1396 of 1481 Resolution No. ______ Page 8 3.All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Applicantas to any or all of the property. 4.The Applicant shall comply with all requirements and guidelines of the City of Chula Vista General Plan; the City’s Growth Management Ordinance; Chula Vista Landscape Manual;Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance; Chula VistaDesign Plan and the Non-Renewable Energy Conservation Plan as amended from time to time, unless specifically modified by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager. These plans may be subject to minor modifications by the appropriate department head, with the approval of the City Manager, however, any material modifications shall be subject to approval by the Planning Commission. 5.If any of the terms, covenants or conditions contained herein shall fail to occur or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revokeor modify all approvals herein granted including issuance of building permits, deny, or further condition the subsequent approvals that are derived from the approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions; and/or seek damages for their violation. The applicant shall be notified 10 days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City. V. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Government Code Section 66020(a) and failure to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, set aside, void or annual imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or otherexactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. VI. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1397 of 1481 Resolution No. ______ Page 9 provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be signed and returned to the City’s Development Services Department. _______________________________________________________ Signature of Property OwnerDate Freeway Commercial North, MUR ______________________________ Printed Name of Property Owner _______________________________________________________ Signature of ApplicantDate ________________________________ Printed Name of Applicant VII. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. Failure to satisfy the conditions of this permit may also result in the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. VIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Councilthat its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution and the permit shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect. 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1398 of 1481 Resolution No. ______ Page 10 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council, based on the above findings and the evidence presented, hereby approvesthe subject Design Review Permit, DR17-0037. Presented by:Approved as to form by: _____________________________________________ Kelly Broughton, FSALAGlen R. Googins Development ServicesDirectorCity Attorney 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1399 of 1481 PROJECTDESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATOR Baldwin&Sons APPLICANT: FreewayCommercial PROJECT ADDRESS: OlympicPkwy&TownCenterDr. SCALE: FILENUMBER: MPA17-0012 NoScale NORTH 2019-06-18 Agenda PacketPage 1400 of 1481 L:\\GabeFiles\\ArcmapLocatorTemplate\\Locators\\MPA170012.ai.12.5.17