HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-06-08 Tech Privacy Task Force Post Agenda Packet City of Chula Vista
Technology and Privacy Advisory Task Force
**POST-MEETING AGENDA**
Date:Wednesday, June 8, 2022
Time:6:00 p.m.
Location:Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA
Meeting Agenda
Pages
1.CALL TO ORDER
2.ROLL CALL
3.PUBLIC COMMENTS - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Any individual may address the task force on any matter within the subject area
of the task force that is not on the agenda. Speakers will have a maximum of
three minutes to provide their comments. A maximum of 20 minutes will be
provided for public comment at this time. Speakers will be called in the order in
which their requests to speak are received. If, after 20 minutes, there are still
individuals in the queue to speak, they will be provided an opportunity to speak
after the business items have concluded.
4.PRESENTATIONS
4.1.Presentation: Privacy 101 3
Pegah Parsi, Chief Privacy Officer at UC San Diego, will provide an
informational presentation covering key concepts, trends, and current
issues in the realm of technology and privacy.
4.2.Presentation: Focus Groups and Community Meetings 22
John Nienstedt, CEO of Competitive Edge Research and
Communication, will provide a presentation on the format and approach
to the four upcoming focus groups. Jeremy Ogul, Madaffer Enterprises,
will provide the preliminary plan for two community outreach meetings.
5.BUSINESS ITEMS
5.1.Meeting Schedule and Review of Upcoming Agenda Items 28
Task Force members will discuss three potential meeting schedules and
finalize regular meeting dates for the remainder of the term. Task Force
members will also have the opportunity to review and discuss the outlook
for agenda items on future agendas.
5.2.Receive and File Meeting Summaries 30
Task Force members will receive and file the meeting summaries from
the April 24 and May 9 meetings.
6.STAFF COMMENTS
7.TASK FORCE MEMBER COMMENTS
8.ADJOURNMENT
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 2 of 33
PRIVACY PRIMERCHULA VISTA TECHNOLOGY & PRIVACY ADVISORY TASK FORCE JUNE 2022
Pegah K. Parsi, JD, MBA
Chief Privacy Officer
UC San Diego
she/her/ella
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 3 of 33
Background and History of
Privacy
•Since the beginning…
•Aristotle drew a distinction between the
public sphere, polis, and the private sphere,
oikos
•JSM, among other political philosophers,
described privacy as the difference between
the realm of governmental authority as
opposed to the realm for self-regulation
2 New Yorker Magazine, 2013.
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 4 of 33
Background and History of
Privacy (cont’d)
•Perceptions have changed throughout
history… usually with new
technologies, industries, or political
conflicts (e.g., toilets, printing press,
cameras, WWII, Stasi, video rentals)
•However, transparency, trust, and
ethics have always been cornerstones
of privacy
3
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 5 of 33
Background and History of
Privacy (cont’d)
•Justice Louis Brandeis’ 1890 Harvard Law Review article coins phrase “right to
privacy”
•1948 UN Declaration of Human Rights recognizes privacy as a fundamental right
•Over 130 countries’ constitutions explicitly recognize the right to privacy
•The right to privacy is implied in the US Constitution,* based on the First, Third,
Fourth, and Fifth Amendments
•Explicitly enumerated in many state constitutions
* Based on Supreme Court interpretation; but
see recent legal trends for potential changes. 4
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 6 of 33
Modern Privacy
•A fundamental human right upon which many other rights and activities are built,
including:
•Freedom of inquiry, thought, research, and speech•Right against unreasonable searches and seizures•Social movements and healthy democracies
•Not just about confidentiality/secrecy
•Ability to exercise control over one’s self and understand the decisions made
about one’s self
•Sometimes described as a bundle of ownership rights or the right to choose
5
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 7 of 33
Privacy Fundamentals
6
•Privacy includes various concepts:
•Bodily privacy
•Territorial privacy
•Communication privacy
•Data privacy
U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Teresa J. Cleveland; U.S.
Air Force photo by Senior Airman Meagan Schutter; Private Phone Call, unknown; Lieutenant Commander Data, Star
Trek: Next Generation.
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 8 of 33
Privacy Fundamentals (cont’d)
7
•What is “personal data”?
•Evolving concept that is much more
expansive than before: Not just direct
identifiers like names and SSNs
•Any data related to a person
Time Magazine cover, 2011.
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 9 of 33
Privacy Fundamentals (cont’d)
8
•Can we be “anonymous”?
•It is increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to truly be
anonymous
•Because of the volume, velocity, and variety of data
collected about each and every one of us, it is
increasingly difficult to truly anonymize datasets
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 10 of 33
Privacy Fundamentals (cont’d)
9
•We are “…walking, talking data
factories”
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 11 of 33
Privacy Fundamentals (cont’d)
10
•Data privacy is
about autonomy
and choice over
your digital profile!
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 12 of 33
Exercise
11
•Day in the life of a student
•You are a student at Outstanding University
(OU)
•Think about the various sources of data
collected about you as you go about a typical
day on campus; how many did you identify?
•Think about all the activities a typical student
might do on a regular day (e.g., parking, going to the
gym)
Getty Images.
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 13 of 33
Changing Privacy Landscape
12
•Renewed interest in uses of technology and data
•Facial recognition technology
•Predictive policing
•Drone use to monitor protests
•“Smart” streetlights, ShotSpotters, etc.
•Use of non-law enforcement tools (e.g.,
app metadata, commercial DNA tests,
home IoTs) for law enforcement purposes
•A note on subjects of investigations
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 14 of 33
On the Horizon
13
•Ubiquity of surveillance technology and surveillance capitalism
in society, at the workplace, and in the home… creates a robust
profile of an individual and their activities
•Dual-use of technology
•More organizations requiring health information
•Sunsetting of emergency protocols… is this likely?
•And, of course, more laws and regulations!
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 15 of 33
Balance
14
•Privacy must be balanced against other societal values, such as
health, national security, community safety, and student success
•Special note: Privacy in emergencies
•Historically, privacy has been a casualty of urgency! Avoid
discounting privacy considerations just because there is an
emergency
•Harms are often evident in the long term and cumulatively
•However, privacy is flexible enough to meet needs of
emergency AND long-term deleterious effects
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 16 of 33
Privacy and Society
15
•Privacy is not just a personal matter; there are societal
consequences to privacy degradation over time… and
societal benefits with increased trust and transparency
•Short-and long-term consequences of data use to
individuals, groups, and society must be taken into
consideration
•Profiling
•Discrimination or exclusion
•Automation (entrenchment) of bias
•Loss of control (manipulation, monetization)
•Erosion of free inquiry, speech
•Loss of political autonomy; “bubbles”
•Self-censorship (algorithmic panopticon)
•Perpetual surveillance
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 17 of 33
Privacy Guiding Principles
16
•When handling any data associated with people, even when a law is
not directly on point, we commit to:
•Stewardship
•Ethical considerations and community oversight
•Privacy by default and design
•Training
•Individual rights, autonomy, and informed engagement
•Transparency, purpose specification, and use limitation
•Data minimization (i.e., minimum necessary principle) and disclosure limitation
•Access control (i.e., need to know principle)
•Security and Data Protection
•Data quality, accuracy, and integrity
•Due diligence when working with third parties handling personal data
•Accountability to individuals and the community
Read the Guiding Principles at privacy.ucsd.edu
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 18 of 33
Shameless Plug
17
•The UC San Diego Privacy 101 Workshops are open to the public and FREE!
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 19 of 33
Resources
18
•UC San Diego Privacy Office website: privacy.ucsd.edu
•Guides, slides, and surmise
•NIST Privacy Framework (draft): https://www.nist.gov/privacy-framework
•What is Privacy?, Privacy International, https://www.privacyinternational.org/explainer/56/what-privacy
•Trusted CI: NSF Cybersecurity Center of Excellence, GDPR Webinar (May ‘18) and slide deck (special thanks to Scott Russell)
•Breaking Down Big Data: De-Identification Standards to Protect Personal Information, ACC Docket, Sept. 11, 2017.
•Of note
•The New York Times Privacy Project, https://www.nytimes.com/series/new-york-times-privacy-project
•“Automatic License Plate Readers: Legal Status and Policy Recommendations for Law Enforcement Use,” Brennan Center for Justice, Sept.
10. 2020. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/automatic-license-plate-readers-legal-status-and-policy-recommendations
•Prof. Carissa Veliz’s website, including blogs,podcasts,interviews,and book information. https://www.carissaveliz.com/
•The Data Equity Framework,We All Count,https://weallcount.com/the-data-process/, last visited June 7, 2022.
•The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, Privacy Law Blog, July 13, 2018.
•Children’s Activity Book: Privacy Pursuit! Games and Activities for Kids. https://www.ipc.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/privacy-pursuit-
activity-book-for-kids_ipc.pdf, Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario.
•The WIRED Guide to Your Personal Data (and Who Is Using It), WIRED, Feb. 2, 2019.
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 20 of 33
Suggestions, comments, questions
19
Pegah K. Parsi, JD MBA
Chief Privacy Officer, UC San Diego
pparsi@ucsd.edu
privacyofficer@ucsd.edu
858-822-4439
privacy.ucsd.edu
@UCSD_Privacy
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 21 of 33
Technology and Privacy Advisory Task Force
DRAFT - Community Meeting Plan
Meeting 1: East Chula Vista
Tuesday, July 26 (tentative) from 6 to 7:30 p.m.
Otay Ranch Branch Library, 2015 Birch Road, Suite 409
Or: Montevalle Community Center, 840 Duncan Ranch Road
Meeting 2: West Chula Vista
Thursday, July 28 (tentative) from 6 to 7:30 p.m.
South Chula Vista Branch Library, 389 Orange Avenue
Meeting Format
1. Check-in
• Attendees will receive a name tag with a randomly assigned number, which will later be
used to sort attendees into breakout groups.
2. Welcome and introductory presentation (30 minutes)
• Presentation will provide information on the work of the Technology and Privacy
Advisory Task Force
3. Live poll survey (15 minutes)
• Using a service such as Sli.do, the presenters will ask a series of questions to get the
conversation started. Poll results will appear live on screen. Questions may include:
What neighborhood or ZIP code do you live in? Have you heard of the Police
Department’s drone as first responder program? How much do you trust the City of
Chula Vista to protect your privacy?
4. Breakout groups (30 minutes)
• Attendees will move to their assigned breakout group of five to seven people each. Each
breakout group will have a moderator who will guide the conversation, starting with an
icebreaker and transitioning to a set of focused questions. The discussion will focus on
attendees’ experiences with government/technology and ideas for privacy protection.
5. Re-convene and report out (15 minutes)
• The moderator for each breakout group will share highlights and insights from the group
discussion.
Groups to target to promote attendance and participation
• City Councilmembers
• South Bay Community Services
• Islamic Center of Eastlake
• ACCE
• Invest in San Diego Families Coalition
• Chula Vista senior centers
• Tech Workers Coalition San Diego
• South Bay People Power
• Chula Vista Elementary School District
• Sweetwater Union High School District
• Third Avenue Village Association
• Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce
• South County Economic Development
Corporation
• Local political party organizations
• Southwestern College
• Chula Vista Community Collaborative
• Additional recommendations?
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 22 of 33
6/8/2022
1
Public Opinion · Public Policy · Organizations · Campaigns
1987 – Founded in San Diego
1988 – Phonecenters established in Riverside, CA and San Diego
1990 – Phonecenters established in Reno, NV and San Diego
1992 – Predictive dialing installed to double interviewing capacity; CERC calls San Diego Mayor’s race
1993 – "The Edge" newsletter launches
1998 – Qualitative focus groups introduced
2000 – CERC calls San Diego Mayor’s race
2003 – KPBS/Competitive Edge Research Poll and Super Bowl poll launched
2004 – CERC calls San Diego Mayor’s race (x2)
2005 – CERC calls San Diego Mayor’s race (x2)
2006 – SDIPR/CERC Opinion Barometer launched; Ballot measures paper presented at AAPOR Conference
2008 – CERC calls San Diego Mayor’s race; Convenes post-election summit @ USD
2009 – Interviewer effects paper presented at AAPOR Conference
2010 – Web-based interviewing and custom panels introduced
2012 – Dial-testing introduced; CERC calls San Diego Mayor’s race (x2)
2013 – CERC calls San Diego Mayor’s race; Business Forecast survey launched
2014 – CERC calls San Diego Mayor’s race
2016 – CERC calls San Diego Mayor’s race
2017 – Phonecenter established in El Paso, TX
2018 – CERC calls CA Governor’s race (x2)
2019 – Ballot measure wording paper presented at AAPOR Conference
2020 – Incumbent vulnerability study accepted for presentation at AAPOR Conference
John Nienstedt, MA Political Science: President
Member, American Association for Public Opinion Research
Insights Association
SBA Entrepreneurial Success Award (2000)
Pollster of the year (x7)
Rachel Lawler, MA Political Science: Research Analyst
Member, American Association for Public Opinion Research
Ronald Zavala:Director of Operations
James Iwu: Research Assistant
David Ferree: Research Facility Manager
Chad Harris: Data Prep Specialist
Chula Vista Privacy
Focus Group Study Outline
June 21st and 23rd
1
2
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 23 of 33
6/8/2022
2
Recruitment
•We select a random sample of Chula Vista adults from a list of residents
•Professional interviewers call those residents on their landlines and cellphones starting June 9th
•Initial round of calls takes 5 days
•Then we begin tech checks to ensure participants are capable of participating
•Some participants will drop out, so interviewers work to replace them
•Recruitment activities continue up until the groups are seated
–Groups are at 5:30 and 7:30 and last at least 90 minutes
•Recruiting is managed by a team led by Call Center Manager David Ferree
–25 years experience.
Page | 3
Participant Parameters
•We want to recruit only Chula Vista residents who will be able to participate
–Some screening questions ensure sufficient bandwidth and access
•We also want to balance the groups to ensure we hear from a cross-section of articulate residents
–West of I-805, between I-805 and SR-125, and east of 125
–Minimum number of residents 46 and younger
–Minimum number of Latino residents
–No law enforcement, media, political, or attorneys
–Most important, a range of folks based on their opinions of the City’s record on privacy
•Very good job [GROUP 2 OR 3]… Somewhat good job [GROUP 1, 2 OR 3]… Somewhat bad job [GROUP
1, 2 OR 4]… Very bad job [GROUP 1 OR 4]… Unsure [MAX 5]
•Group #1 will be comprised of residents who don’t think the city is doing a very good job
•Group #2 will be comprised of residents who don’t think the city is doing a very bad job
•Group #3 will be comprised of residents who think the city is doing a good job
•Group #4 will be comprised of residents who think the city is doing a bad job.
Page | 4
3
4
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 24 of 33
6/8/2022
3
Moderator
•My role as moderator is to manage the discussion so that a rich discussion gets us the information the city
needs
–I do this without putting my thumb on the scale
–I do this by putting respondents at ease but also by pulling thoughts out of them
–A moderator must allow participants to speak – respectfully – but must also keep the group moving.
Page | 5
Participant Confidentiality
•To achieve maximum honesty and sharing from the participants we must make the discussions confidential
•We recommend city staff and task force members not view the proceedings or the video.
Page | 6
5
6
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 25 of 33
6/8/2022
4
Discussion Guide I
•Focus groups are meant to explore issues and how people talk about them
–Groups are typically not definitive
•We begin the discussions generally and get more specific
•Ground rules and introduction
•Important Chula Vista issues
–Let’s see if privacy issues come up organically and, if so, where do the rank relative to other issues
•Knowledge of what Chula Vista may be doing to protect privacy
–If there is some knowledge, is what’s being done achieving its goal?
Page | 7
Discussion Guide II
•Evaluations
–How is the city doing regarding keeping the information residents submit to it private?
–How is the city doing regarding keeping the residents’ involuntarily collected information private?
•License plate readers, for example
–How is the city doing regarding keeping the video information it collects private?
•Drones, traffic cameras, body worn cameras
–All these questions are followed up with “Why do you say that?” to give us a rich idea of the whole picture
•Ideation
–What are your ideas for addressing any issues?
•Examples
–Participants will hear what policies other similar cities have adopted
•Policy prescriptions
–Participants will work to come up with a set of policy prescriptions
–These could be “dos” and “don’ts”
–Or they could be more fully-formed policies.
Page | 8
7
8
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 26 of 33
6/8/2022
5
Results, Analysis and Presentation
•You’ll receive our observations from the 1st two groups on the morning of the 22nd
–We can then revise the guide for the second night to suit
•You’ll receive our observations from the last two groups on the morning of the 24th
•We will then begin analyzing the transcripts and video to prepare a final written report
–That report will contain an introduction, summary of important points, and findings
•I will then present the findings and recommendations.
Page | 9
Thank You!
Page | 10
9
10
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 27 of 33
Technology and Privacy Advisory Task Force
Meeting Scheduling Options
The first four regular meetings of the task force were April 25, May 9, June 8, and June 27. Four more meetings were
planned over the months of July through September, for a total of eight task force meetings. Task force members have
indicated an interest in adding one or two meetings to the calendar, for a total of nine or 10 meetings over the project
timespan. Below are three options for the task force to consider.
Meeting Sequence A – No Additional Meetings (original schedule)
July 2022
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
August 2022
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
September 2022
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
Meeting Sequence B – One Additional Meeting
July 2022
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
August 2022
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
September 2022
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
Meeting Sequence C – Two Additional Meetings
July 2022
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
August 2022
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
September 2022
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 28 of 33
Technology and Privacy Advisory Task Force
Upcoming Dates and Agenda Outlook
Thursday, June 23 at 5:30 p.m. – On-site demo and briefing with City departments
• Traffic Engineering Division
• Information and Technology Services (ITS)
• (Additional departments TBD)
Monday, June 27 at 6 p.m. – Task Force regular meeting #4
• Presentation by Ad Hoc STOP Chula Vista PD Surveillance Group (30 minutes)
• Additional technology briefings by City departments (45 minutes)
o Development Services
o Housing Division
o (Additional departments TBD)
• Debrief and follow-up questions from on-site tours (30 minutes)
• Work Session #1: Introduce “Parking Lot of Policy Ideas” (30 minutes)
Monday, July 18 at 6 p.m. – Task Force regular meeting #5
• Competitive Edge presentation on focus group results (45 minutes)
• Work Session #2: Policy Recommendations
Tuesday, July 26 at 6 p.m. – Community outreach meeting #1 (tentative)
Thursday, July 28 at 6 p.m. – Community outreach meeting #2 (tentative)
August – September: Task Force regular meetings #6 – 8
September 30: Deadline to return final policy recommendations to City Manager
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 29 of 33
Technology and Privacy Advisory Task Force
Meeting Summary
May 9, 2022
Task Force members present: City staff and consultants present:
Mae Case
Candice Custodio-Tan
Lucia Napolez
Pedro Rios
Sophia Rodriguez, Chair
Patricia Ruiz
Charles Walker
Maria Whitehorse
Dominic LiMandri
Dennis Gakunga
Simon Silva
Adrianna Hernandez
Jim Madaffer
Jeremy Ogul
Task Force members absent
Carlos De La Toba
Rafal Jankowski, Co-Chair
Art Pacheco
The meeting was called to order at 6:05 p.m.
Public Comment – Items Not On The Agenda
Three speakers provided public comment: Nick Paúl, Nancy Relaford, Margaret Baker. One individual
provided e-comment: Seth Hall.
Presentation on Existing State and Federal Law
Simon Silva, Deputy City Attorney for the City of Chula Vista, provided a detailed presentation on the
state and federal laws that control privacy. Task force members engaged in questions and discussion
regarding the presentation.
Two speakers provided public comments: Margaret Baker, Norell Martinez.
Potential continuation of agenda items
Jeremy Ogul informed the task force that they had the option to delay one of the remaining agenda items
to a future meeting.
Member LiMandri moved to delay Item 4.2, the presentation on privacy in other California cities, to a
future meeting. The motion was seconded by Member Napolez. The motion failed with the following
votes:
YES (2): LiMandri, Napolez
NO (7): Custodio-Tan, Whitehorse, Rodriguez, Case, Rios, Ruiz, Walker
Presentation on privacy in other California cities
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 30 of 33
Jeremy Ogul presented an overview of 10 examples of how other cities have approached privacy
technology and oversight with advisory bodies.
Tasked force members engaged in questions and discussion of the presentation.
One individual provided e-comment: Seth Hall.
Discussion of public outreach plan
Jeremy Ogul asked the task force for feedback and ideas on the format. Task force members engaged in
discussion and provided ideas and general direction to Madaffer Enterprises.
Public Comment: Items on the Agenda
Two speakers provided public comments: Margaret Baker, Nancy Relaford.
Staff Comments
Jeremy Ogul spoke regarding the formation of future agendas.
Task Force Member Comments
Member Custodio-Tan moved to invite the Ad Hoc STOP Chula Vista Surveillance Group to give a 30-
minute presentation (including 10 minutes of questions and answers by task force members) at a future
task force meeting. The motion was seconded by Member Rios. The motion passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
- Meeting summary prepared by Jeremy Ogul
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 31 of 33
Technology and Privacy Advisory Task Force
Meeting Summary
April 25, 2022
Task Force members present: City staff and consultants present:
Mae Case
Candice Custodio-Tan
Carlos De La Toba
Rafal Jankowski
Lucia Napolez
Art Pacheco
Pedro Rios
Sophia Rodriguez
Patricia Ruiz
Charles Walker
Maria Whitehorse
Dominic LiMandri
Maria Kachadoorian
Anne Steinberger
Dennis Gakunga
Simon Silva
Adrianna Hernandez
Jim Madaffer
Jeremy Ogul
Introductions
The meeting began at 6 p.m. with introductory remarks by the City Manager, Maria Kachadoorian.
Dennis Gakunga presented an overview of the City’s smart city policies and initiatives over the last five
years. Jim Madaffer introduced Madaffer Enterprises. Jeremy Ogul presented an overview of the task
force timeline and scope of work. Each task force member introduced themselves.
Non-Agenda Public Comment
Four speakers provided public comment: Nick Paúl, Margaret Baker, Nancy Relaford, Norell Martinez.
Eduardo Saldivar submitted a written comment but did not wish to speak.
Presentation on Public Opinion Research
John Nienstedt of Competitive Edge Research & Communication provided a detailed presentation of the
findings from a survey of 607 Chula Vista residents conducted March 21 – 30, 2022. Task force members
engaged in questions and discussion of the research findings.
Discussion of Task Force Logistics
Through discussion, the task force agreed to set the following dates and times for upcoming meetings:
• Monday, May 9 at 6 p.m.
• Thursday, June 2 at 6 p.m. (or Wednesday, June 1 at 6 p.m. as an alternative)
• Monday, June 27 at 6 p.m.
Additionally, a majority of task force members indicated they were available to attend an on-site tour and
demonstration at Chula Vista Police Department on Wednesday, May 18 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m.
After discussion of the role of a task force chair, Member Ruiz nominated Member Rodriguez as Chair.
The motion was seconded by member Whitehorse. The motion passed unanimously with all members
present.
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 32 of 33
Member Pacheco then nominated Member Jankowski as Co-Chair. The motion was seconded by member
Napolez. The motion passed with the following votes:
YES (7): Pacheco, De La Toba, Walker, Jankowski, Napolez, Ruiz, LiMandri
NO (5): Custodio-Tan, Whitehorse, Rodriguez, Case, Rios
The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
- Meeting summary prepared by Jeremy Ogul
DATE Technology & Privacy Advisory Task Force Agenda Page 33 of 33