HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022.02.09 - Letter from SAFER - Item 5.1
BY E-MAIL
February 9, 2022
Planning Commission
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
PC@chulavistaca.gov
RE: Heritage Industrial Center (DR21-0007; VAR21-0001)
Planning Commission Agenda Item 5.1 (Feb. 9, 2022)
Dear Chair Zaker and Members of the Planning Commission:
I am writing on behalf of the Supporters Alliance For Environmental Responsibility
(“SAFER”) and its members living and/or working in and around the City of Chula Vista
(“City”) concerning the Heritage Industrial Center Project (DR21-0007; VAR21-0001)
(“Project”) to be heard as Agenda Item 5.1 at the February 9, 2022 Planning Commission
Meeting.
The City has not conducted any environmental review for this specific Project pursuant to
the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Rather, City is claiming that the Project
was adequately reviewed in the 2014 Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Otay
Ranch University Villages Project Comprehensive Sectional Planning Area (“2014 EIR”). When
relying on a prior EIR for a project, CEQA provides certain procedures, including required
findings, prior to a determination that no new environmental documentation is required.
Although no new documentation is required in certain circumstances, CEQA also mandates the
circumstances in which reliance on a previous EIR still requires the preparation of an additional
environmental impact report (“EIR”) or mitigated negative declaration (“MND”).
At this point, the City has not conducted the analysis required by CEQA nor are the
required findings documented anywhere in the Staff Report or proposed Resolutions.
Furthermore, SAFER’s review of the Project with the assistance of wildlife biology expert
Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., and air quality experts Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., and Paul E.
Rosenfeld, Ph.D., of the Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”) determined that
CEQA requires an EIR or MND for this Project. The expert comments of Dr. Smallwood and
SWAPE are attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively. As such, SAFER is
requesting that the Commission refrain from approval of the Project at this time until an
environmental impact EIR or MND is prepared.
SAFER Comment
Heritage Industrial Center Project
February 9, 2022
Page 2 of 10
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The Heritage Industrial Center Project proposes the development of three industrial shell
buildings for office and storage/warehouse/ecommerce uses. The three industrial shell buildings
are comprised of, Building A with 104,900 square feet and 132 parking spaces, Building B wit
55,700 square feet and 92 parking spaces and Building C with 40,600 square feet and 63 parking
spaces. The 11.6-acre undeveloped project site is located north and northwest of Heritage Road
at the intersection of Heritage Road and Santa Maya (Lots 814, 815 and 816 of Map 16160),
within the Otay Ranch Village 3 Business Park.
For CEQA review of the Project, the City has not prepared any new environemtnal
documentation for the Project, but rather intends to rely entirely on the 2014 EIR prepared for
the Otay Ranch University Villages Project. The proposed Resolutions for the Project
(Resolution No. DR21-0007 and Resolution No. VAR21-0001) state,
[T]he Director of Development Services has reviewed the project for compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and has determined that
the project was adequately covered in previously adopted Final Environmental
Impact Report, EIR-13-01, prepared for the Otay Ranch University Villages Project
Comprehensive Sectional Planning Area Plan Amendment and certified by City
Council on December 2, 2014; therefore, no further environmental review or
documentation is required.
The Otay Ranch University Villages Project, as analyzed in the 2014 EIR, involved three
Sectional Planning Areas (“SPAs”) for four villages covering approximately 1,375 acres within
Otay Ranch. The SPA for “Village Three North and a Portion of Village Four” (which is where
the proposed Project would be located) created a pedestrian-oriented urban village with 1,597
homes, 20,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses, 17.8 acres of community park, 8.6 acres of
open space, and 28.6 acres of industrial uses. The other two SPAs for Village Eight East and
Village Ten were for pedestrian-oriented urban village with a mix of residential, commercial,
andretail uses. The Village Eight East SPA covered the development of 3,650 homes and the
Village Ten SPA covered the development of 1,740 homes.
The 2014 EIR concluded that the University Villages Project would result in significant
and unavoidable impacts to aesthetics, traffic, air quality, cultural resources, agricultural
resources, public utilities, and global climate change.
//
//
SAFER Comment
Heritage Industrial Center Project
February 9, 2022
Page 3 of 10
LEGAL STANDARD
CEQA provides a procedure for agencies to utilize previous EIRs when analyzing a new
project. For program EIRs1, “later activities in the program must be examined in the light of the
program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared.”
(14 CCR § 15168(c).) No new environmental document is required “[i]f the agency finds that
pursuant to Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required.” (14 CCR § 15168(c)(2).) The
analysis under Section 15162 determines whether the proposed project is “within the scope” of
the previous program EIR. (14 CCR § 15168(c)(2).) If a later project is outside the scope of the
program, then it is treated as a separate project. (See Sierra Club v. County of Sonoma (1992) 6
Cal.App.4th 1307, 1320-21.) If a proposed project is not within the scope of the previous
program EIR, the next consideration is whether the “later activity would have effects that were
not examined in the program.” (14 CCR § 15168(c)(1).) A program environmental review may
only serve “to the extent that it contemplates and adequately analyzes the potential
environmental impacts of the project.” (Sierra Nevada Conservation v. County of El Dorado
(2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1156, 1171 [quoting Citizens for Responsible Equitable Envtl. Dev. v.
City of San Diego Redevelopment Agency (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 598, 615].) If the program
environmental review does not evaluate the environmental impacts of the project, a tiered CEQA
document must be completed before the project is approved. (Id. at 1184.)
When an EIR is prepared for a later activity under a program EIR, CEQA allows the
project-specific EIR to “tier” off the program EIR. (PRC § 21094; 14 CCR § 15168(c)(1).) “[I]f
there is substantial evidence in the record that the later project may arguably have a significant
adverse effect on the environment which was not examined in the prior program EIR, doubts
must be resolved in favor of environmental review and the agency must prepare a new tiered
EIR.” (Sierra Club v. Cty. of Sonoma (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1307, 1319.) The tiered EIR may
“incorporate by reference the discussion in any prior [EIR] and [] concentrate on the
environmental effects which (a) are capable of being mitigated, or (b) were not analyzed as
significant effects on the environment in the prior [EIR]” (PRC § 21068.5.) A tiered EIR is
required if any substantial evidence in the record indicates that a project may have a significant
environmental impact that was not previously analyzed—even if contrary evidence exists to
support the agency’s decision. (14 CCR § 15064(f)(1); Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento
(2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 931.) “It is a question of law, not fact, whether a fair argument
1 A program EIR is an EIR which may be prepared on a series of actions that can be
characterized as one large project and are related either:
(1) Geographically,
(2) As logical parts in the chain of contemplated actions,
(3) In connection with issuance of rules, regulations, plans, or other general criteria to
govern the conduct of a continuing program, or
(4) As individual activities carried out under the same authorizing statutory or regulatory
authority and having generally similar environmental effects which can be mitigated in
similar ways.
(14 CCR § 15168(a).)
SAFER Comment
Heritage Industrial Center Project
February 9, 2022
Page 4 of 10
exists, and the courts owe no deference to the lead agency’s determination.” (Pocket Protectors,
supra, 124 Cal.App.4th at 928.) Furthermore, when a “first tier” EIR admits a significant,
unavoidable environmental impact, then the agency must prepare a second tier EIRs for later
projects to ensure that those unmitigated impacts are “mitigated or avoided.” (Communities for a
Better Envt. v. Cal. Res. Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 122-25.)
Similar to program EIRs, when an agency relies on a previous project-specific EIR, the
requirement to prepare subsequent EIR or MND is governed by Section 15162 of the CEQA
Guidelines (14 CCR § 15162.) Additionally, where changes or additions to a previous project
EIR are necessary but none of the conditions of Section 15162 are met, CEQA requires the
preparation of an addendum. (14 CCR § 15164.)
In light of the above, the proper initial inquiry when relying on a previous EIR is whether
the newly proposed project satisfies any of the conditions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.
Pursuant to Section 15162(a), a subsequent EIR or MND is required when:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of
the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project
is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative
Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous
EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of
the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe
than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible
would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt
the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to
adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
An agency’s determination that none of the conditions of Section 15162 have been met and,
therefore, that no subsequent EIR or MND is required for the new project must be supported by
substantial evidence. (14 CCR § 15162(a); see 14 CCR § 15168(c)(2).)
SAFER Comment
Heritage Industrial Center Project
February 9, 2022
Page 5 of 10
DISCUSSION
I. Prior to a Determination That No Additional Environmental Review is Necessary,
CEQA Requires Findings That the Conditions of CEQA Guidelines 15162 Have Not
Been Met.
The City has not provided any evidence substantiating its determination that “the project
was adequately covered” by the 2014 EIR. A decision to not prepare any environmental
document for the Project is only permissible if the City finds, based on substantial evidence, that
none of the conditions of CEQA Guidelines section 15162 have occurred. (14 CCR 15168(c)(2).)
It does not appear that the City has considered the Project in light of the 2014 EIR and evaluated
whether the conditions of Section 15162 have been met. Without such an analysis backed by
substantial evidence, the City’s decision to not prepare any environmental document for the
Project is improper. At the very least, the City must go back and evaluate the Project under
Section 15162 prior to a determination that no additional environmental review is necessary.
II. An EIR is Required to Address the Project’s Impacts on Biological Resources Due
to Changed Circumstances and New Information Since 2014.
When relying on a previous EIR for a later project, the CEQA Guidelines require the
preparation of an EIR or MND where “[s]ubstantial changes occur with respect to the
circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.” (14
CCR § 15162(a)(2).) An EIR or MND is also required where new information shows that a
project will result in (1) significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or (2) a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. (14 CCR § 15162(a)(3).)
Expert wildlife biologist Dr. Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., reviewed the 2014 EIR and the
Project and concluded that the 2014 EIR fails to account for new impacts and changed
circumstances since 2014. Dr. Smallwood’s comment is attached hereto as Exhibit A. As
discussed below, Dr. Smallwood identified numerous changed circumstances since certification
of the 2014 EIR, including the environmental setting of the Project, the rate of wildlife decline
due to factors such habitat loss and fragmentation, and the protection status of species under state
and federal law. Furthermore, Dr. Smallwood also discussed new impacts that were not
previously discussed in 2014 and the inadequacy of existing mitigation to address the Project’s
significant impacts to wildlife. In light of the changed circumstances and new information
identified by Dr. Smallwood, the City should prepare an EIR for the Project to disclose and
adequately mitigate the impacts to wildlife.
SAFER Comment
Heritage Industrial Center Project
February 9, 2022
Page 6 of 10
A. The environmental setting for the Project has changed since the certification
of the 2014 EIR.
The 2014 EIR relied on biological surveys performed from the early 1990s to 2011. (Ex.
A, p. 1.) As Dr. Smallwood explains,
The first step in analysis of potential project impacts to biological resources is to
accurately characterize the existing environmental setting, including the species
that use the site, their relative abundances, how they use the site, key ecological
relationships, and known and ongoing threats to those species with special status.
A reasonably accurate characterization of the environmental setting can provide the
baseline against which to analyze project impacts.
(Ex. A, p. 2.) At this point, the data relied on in the 2014 EIR for biological resources is over a
decade old and “completed too long ago to remain relevant to the current environmental setting.”
(Id.) Factors that have changed the environmental setting include habitat loss that has resulted in
the Project site remaining as one of the few patches of open space in the surrounding area as well
as the protection status under state and federal law for species known to occur at/near the Project
site. (Id.)
Given these changes, new detection surveys are warranted to ensure that impacts to
special-stats species are disclosed and mitigated to the extent possible in an EIR.
B. New information regarding the rate of decline in wildlife indicates that
impacts to biological resources are substantially more severe than known in
2014.
New scientific information that only became available in 2019 found that North
American birds have suffered a 29% decline in overall abundance over the past 50 years. (Ex. A,
p. 8.) This shocking rate of decline outpaced anything that was known in 2014 and “poses dire
ecological and economic consequences that have yet to be fully understood, but which must be
considered in any serious cumulative impact analysis.” (Id.) Without addressing this new
information in an EIR, the impacts to wildlife on a project level and cumulative level are
underestimated an inadequate.
C. New information regarding the protection status of species under state and
federal law requires a new EIR.
The 2014 EIR included a list of species that were likely to occur at the Project site. (See
Ex. A, Table 1, pp. 3-6.) Since 2014, thirteen of the species identified in the 2014 EIR have
subsequently had their protection status changed, “including tricolored blackbird, which was
designated as threatened under the California Endangered Species Act, and Crotches bumble bee,
which was designated a Candidate for California Endangered, and Monarch, which was
designated a federal candidate for listing.” (Ex. A, p. 8.) Additionally, the California Fish and
SAFER Comment
Heritage Industrial Center Project
February 9, 2022
Page 7 of 10
Game Code was recently amended in 2019 to protect most California birds, which covers most
of the bird species documented at or near the project site. (Id.) Indeed, the fact that these species
were not protected in 2014—but are now—is new information that must be addressed in an EIR.
(See Mira Monte Homeowners Assn. v. County of Ventura (1985) 165 Cal.App.3d 357.)
D. New information regarding research tools and data are available since 2014
to assess the Project’s impacts to wildlife.
Dr. Smallwood notes that, since the 2014 EIR, there has been a “proliferation in use of
electronic data bases . . . These data bases have rapidly added to the scientific body of knowledge
on the distribution of wildlife species.” (Ex. A, p. 9.) According to eBird and iNaturalist records
that are now available, 95 special-status species of wildlife have been detected nearby or within
the region of the project site. (Id.) These databases, which were not available when the 2014 EIR
was certified, indicate that “the site is inherently rich in wildlife and it is rich in special-status
species of wildlife.” (Id.) Dr. Smallwood concluded that “[g]reater use of the new tools and data
are needed to appropriately analyze the project’s potential impacts to wildlife” and therefore, “[a]
new project-specific EIR is warranted.” (Id.)
E. New information regarding habitat loss and fragmentation is available since
2014 to assess the Project’s impacts to wildlife.
Dr. Smallwood found that circumstances surrounding the Project have changed due to
“the diminished availability of open space to wildlife in the region of the project site since the
1990s-2011 biological surveys that were completed in support of the 2014 FEIR.” (Ex. A, p. 9.)
Since the biological surveys for the 2014 EIR were conducted, “much of the landscape around
the project site has been converted to residential, commercial and industrial uses . . . [and] [l]arge
tracts of open space have been lost to development.” (Id.) Due to these changes, development of
the Project would “further fragment terrestrial travel routes that currently remain available to
wildlife.” (Id.) Dr. Smallwood concluded that the City has so far “ignore[d] this changed
circumstance caused by habitat fragmentation,” which should be addressed in a new EIR for the
Project. (Id.)
F. New information regarding impacts to wildlife from collisions with vehicles is
available since 2014.
Dr. Smallwood noted that “[s]cientific advances in understanding of road traffic impacts
to wildlife represent another important changed circumstance.” (Ex. A, p. 9.) Importantly,
collisions with vehicles not only impacts “the animals that would be struck and killed by
automobiles on the project site” but also includes the animals “killed while crossing roads
traversed by cars and trucks originating from or headed toward the project site.” (Ex. A, p. 10.)
Dr. Smallwood estimates that collisions with vehicles as a result of the Project would kill
576 animals annually (over 28,000 deaths over 50 years of project operations). (Ex. A, p. 12.)
Especially due to the special-status bird species likely to occur at or near the Project, these
SAFER Comment
Heritage Industrial Center Project
February 9, 2022
Page 8 of 10
collisions represent a significant impact to wildlife that should be addressed in an EIR.
G. The mitigation measures of the 2014 EIR are inadequate for the Project’s
impacts to special-status species.
To the extent that the 2014 EIR relied on payments to the San Diego Multiple Species
Conservation Plan (“MSCP”), such mitigation is inadeqaute to address the Project’s impacts to
wildlife. As Dr. Smallwood notes, the MSCP does not cover 81% of the species likely to occur at
the Project site. (Ex. A, p. 12.) Furthermore, of the 13 species whose protection status has
changed since 2015, 77% are not covered by the MSCP. (Id.) As such, new mitigation measures
should be formulated in an EIR for the Project to ensure that impacts to special-status species are
reduced to the extent possible.
III. An EIR is Required Because New Mitigation Measures Are Available to Address the
Project’s Air Quality Impacts.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162, a subsequent EIR is required where new
information since the certification of the 2014 EIR demonstrates that mitigation measures “which
are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce
one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt
the mitigation measure.” (14 CCR § 15168(a)(3)(D).)
The 2014 EIR found that implementation of the Otay University Villages project would
have significant and unavoidable air quality impacts (2014 EIR, pp. 5.4-25 to 5-28.) Specifically,
the 2014 concluded that construction and operation emissions would result in significant and
unavoidable impacts from emissions of VOCs, NOx, CO, PM2.5, and PM10. (Id.) The 2014 EIR
also concluded that the exacerbation of air quality problems would result in significant and
unavoidable impacts to global climate change as a result of ozone formation (2014 EIR, p. 5.14-
29.)
Air quality experts from SWAPE found that the Heritage Industrial Project would still
result in significant impacts to air quality and green house gases (“GHGs”). Using CalEEMod,
SWAPE calculated that emissions of ROGs during construction of the Project would exceed the
CEQA significant thresholds established by the San Diego Air Pollution Control District. (Ex. B,
p. 2-3.)
SWAPE also prepared a screening-level health risk assessment (“HRA”) to evaluate
potential impacts of diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) emissions during the construction and
operation of the Project. (Ex. B, pp. 4-5.) SWAPE used AERSCREEN, the leading screening-
level air quality dispersion model. (Id. at p. 4.) SWAPE used a sensitive receptor distance of 150
meters and analyzed impacts to individuals at different stages of life based on guidance from the
California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) and SDAPCD
guidance. (Id. at pp. 6.)
SAFER Comment
Heritage Industrial Center Project
February 9, 2022
Page 9 of 10
SWAPE found that the excess cancer risk for infants and children at the closest sensitive
receptor located approximately 150 meters away, over the course of Project construction and
operation, are approximately 40.2 and 13.9 in one million in one million, respectively. (Ex. B, p.
7.) Moreover, SWAPE found that the excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime
is approximately 58.5 in one million. (Id.) Thus, the infant, child, and lifetime cancer risks all
exceed the SDAPCD significance threshold of 10 in one million. Even with a less-conservative
model that does not include the recommended age sensitivity factors, SWAPE still found that the
lifetime cancer risks exceeded the SDAPCD threshold. (Id.)
SWAPE also calculated that the GHG impacts of the Project remain significant. (Ex. B,
pp. 8-9.) Using their calculations from the CalEEMod, SWAPE found that the Project would
result in 1,756 MT CO2e/year of net annual operational emissions. (Id.) This figure exceeds the
bright-line GHG significance threshold established by the County of San Diego of 900 MT
CO2e/year.
In order to mitigate the significant impacts identified in the 2014 EIR for the Otay Ranch
University Villages Project as well as in SWAPE’s analysis for the Heritage Industrial Center
Project, SWAPE recommends numerous feasible mitigation measures to reduce the Project
emissions. (Ex. B, pp. 9-11.) SWAPE’s suggested mitigation measures include measures that
were not available in 2014 when the previous EIR was certified, including the requirement for
heavy-duty off-road construction equipment to be outfitted with engines meeting the EPA’s Tier-
4 Final emission standards. (Id.) Because such mitigation measures were not available or known
in 2014, the mitigation measures constitute new information and the City has not adopted these
new mitigation measures, CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requires the preparation of a
subsequent EIR or MND prior to approval of the Project. (14 CCR § 15162(a)(3)(D).)
Furthermore, this new information means that the Project is not within the scope of the 2014 EIR
and an initial study followed by an EIR or MND is required to examine impacts that were not
examined in the 2014 EIR. (14 CCR § 15168(c).)
IV. The Project Requires a Tiered EIR Because the Significant and Unavoidable
Impacts Identified in the 2014 EIR Will Remain Significant with the
Implementation of the Heritage Industrial Center Project.
As demonstrated above, when reviewed under CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and
15168, it is improper for the City to refrain from preparing a CEQA document for the Project.
Rather, the Guidelines require that the City prepare an EIR or MND for the Project, which can
tier from the 2014 EIR as necessary. (14 CCR 15168(c)(1).)
In Communities for a Better Envt. v. Cal. Res. Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 122-
25, the court of appeal held that when a “first tier” EIR admits a significant, unavoidable
environmental impact, then the agency must prepare second tier EIRs for later projects to ensure
that those unmitigated impacts are “mitigated or avoided.” (Id.) The court reasoned that the
unmitigated impacts were not “adequately addressed” in the first tier EIR since it was not
“mitigated or avoided.” (Id.) Thus, significant effects disclosed in first tier EIRs will trigger
SAFER Comment
Heritage Industrial Center Project
February 9, 2022
Page 10 of 10
second tier EIRs unless such effects have been “adequately addressed,” in a way that ensures the
effects will be “mitigated or avoided.” (Id.) A second tier EIR is required especially where the
impact still cannot be fully mitigated and a statement of overriding considerations will be
required. The court explained, “The requirement of a statement of overriding considerations is
central to CEQA’s role as a public accountability statute; it requires public officials, in approving
environmental detrimental projects, to justify their decisions based on counterbalancing social,
economic or other benefits, and to point to substantial evidence in support.” (Id. at 124-25.)
As such, because the Project will have continue to result in significant impacts to air
quality and GHGs that were identified as significant an unavoidable in the 2014 EIR, CEQA
requires that the City go through the EIR process for the Project to ensure that the impacts are
disclosed and a statement of overriding considerations is adopted for unavoidable impacts.
CONCLUSION
For the above reasons, SAFER respectfully requests that the Planning Commission
refrain from approving the Project at this time. Rather, the City should analyze the Project
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162 and prepare a new EIR for the Project that tiers
from the 2014 EIR prior to approval.
Sincerely,
Brian B. Flynn
Lozeau Drury LLP
EXHIBIT A
1
Shawn Smallwood, PhD
3108 Finch Street
Davis, CA 95616
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 8 February 2022
RE: Heritage Industrial Center
To Whom It May Concern,
I write to comment on the Design Review prepared by City of Chula Vista (2021) in
support of the proposed Heritage Industrial Center, which would add 201,200 square
feet of warehouse floor space on 11.6 acres of what is currently open space north and
northwest of Heritage Road at the intersection of Heritage Road and Santa Maya. I also
reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) prepared for the Otay Ranch
University Villages Project Comprehensive Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan
Amendment of 2014. The 2014 FEIR relied on biological surveys performed from the
early 1990s to 2011. Since the characterization of the environmental setting and the
analysis of potential impacts to biological resources during the period of from the early
1990s to 2011, substantial new information on biological resources warrants the
preparation of a new Project-specific EIR.
My qualifications for preparing expert comments are the following. I hold a Ph.D.
degree in Ecology from University of California at Davis, where I also worked as a post-
graduate researcher in the Department of Agronomy and Range Sciences. I study
animal density and distribution, habitat selection, interactions between wildlife and
human infrastructure and activities, and conservation of rare and endangered species. I
authored numerous papers on special-status species issues. I served as Chair of the
Conservation Affairs Committee for The Wildlife Society – Western Section. I am a
member of The Wildlife Society and the Raptor Research Foundation, and I lectured
part-time at California State University, Sacramento. I was Associate Editor of wildlife
biology’s premier scientific journal, The Journal of Wildlife Management, as well as of
Biological Conservation, and I was on the Editorial Board of Environmental
Management. I have performed wildlife surveys in California for thirty-six years. My
CV is attached.
Since the 1990s-2011 biological surveys in support of the 2014 FEIR, changed
circumstances relevant to potential impacts to wildlife warrant the preparation of a new
project-specific EIR. These changes include (1) biological surveys at the site ranging
from the 1990s to 2011 are outdated and can no longer support an accurate
characterization of the current environmental setting; (2) wildlife species declined since
the 1990s-2011; (3) statutes and listings protecting wildlife have been added or changed;
(4) new research and new data bases; (5) habitat loss and habitat fragmentation further
diminished wildlife over the past 11 to 30 years; and understanding vastly improved of
wildlife mortality caused by (6) road mortality, which is particularly relevant in the face
2
of the project’s proposed construction of 201,200 square feet of warehouse floor space;
and the needed mitigation for special-status species would be inadequately addressed by
payment of fees to the San Diego County Multi-Species Conservation Plan (MSCP).
Given the long list of special-status species that are known or suspected to use the site of
the proposed project (Table 1), these and other changes in circumstances warrant the
preparation of a new project-specific EIR. A reasonable argument can be made for the
need to prepare a new EIR to appropriately analyze potential impacts and to formulate
mitigation measures.
The current California Department of Fish and Wildlife survey protocol for burrowing
owls (CDFW 2012) was not available in the 1990s or in 2011. Another example is the
newer protocol for southwestern willow flycatcher (Sogge et al. 2010). Special-status
species that were not detected in in the earlier surveys performed in support of the 2014
FEIR might be detectable now with improved survey protocols. Because the detection
survey protocols have been improved, circumstances have changed regarding the
detection likelihoods for some of these species.
Detection surveys are designed by species’ experts to, at reasonable cost, provide the
best chance for detecting the targeted species by applying the methods and survey effort
most likely to detect the species if it is indeed present. The objectives of detection
surveys are to (1) support negative findings of species when appropriate, (2) inform
preconstruction surveys to improve their efficacy, (3) estimate project impacts, and (4)
inform compensatory mitigation and other forms of mitigation. Detection surveys
based on modern protocols should be implemented to inform a new project-specific
EIR.
(1) OUTDATED CHARACTERIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The first step in analysis of potential project impacts to biological resources is to
accurately characterize the existing environmental setting, including the species that use
the site, their relative abundances, how they use the site, key ecological relationships,
and known and ongoing threats to those species with special status. A reasonably
accurate characterization of the environmental setting can provide the baseline against
which to analyze project impacts. Methods to achieve this first step typically include
surveys of the site for biological resources and reviews of literature, databases and local
experts for documented occurrences of special-status species. In this case, these
essential steps were completed too long ago to remain relevant to the current
environmental setting. The environmental setting of the early 1990s or even of 2011 is
not the environmental setting of today (Figure 1). Habitat loss and habitat
fragmentation has left the project site as one of the few patches of open space remaining
to special-status species of wildlife. It stands to reason that special-status species are
more likely to occur on the project site than in earlier years for the simple reason that
there are few other places left for them to persist. Given this substantial change in
circumstances, protocol-level detection surveys for special-status species are warranted,
and these surveys should inform a project-specific EIR.
3
Table 1. Special-status species wildlife of likely to occur at the project according to the FEIR and to documented
occurrences of the species in the project area (eBird and iNaturalist data base records). I also indicated each species is
covered by the San Diego MSCP. Status designations in yellow highlight were added since the 2014 FEIR.
Common name, Species name
Status1
Covered
by MSCP
take
permit
Occurrence
likelihood
based on
databases
Quino checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha quino FE, CSD1 In region
Monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus FC, CSD2 Very close
Crotch’s bumble bee, Bombus crotchii CE candidate In region
Coastal rosy boa, Lichanura trivirgata FSC [1993] , CSD2 In region
San Diego ringneck snake, Diadophis punctatus similis CSD2 In region
California glossy snake, Arizona elegans occidentalis SSC, CSD2 In range
South coast garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis SSC, CSD2 In range
Red diamond rattlesnake, Crotalus ruber SSC, CSD2 Very close
Coast patchnose snake, Salvadora hexalepis virgultea SSC, CSD2 In region
Orange-throated whiptail, Aspidoscelis hyperythra WL, CSD2 Yes Very close
San Diegan tiger whiptail, Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri SSC, CSD2 Very close
Coast horned lizard, Phrynosoma blainvillii SSC, CSD2 Yes Very close
Coronado skink, Plestiodon skiltonianus interparietalis WL, CSD2 In region
San Diego Banded gecko, Coleonyx variegatus abbotti SSC, CSD1 In region
American white pelican, Pelacanus erythrorhynchos SSC1, CSD2 Nearby
Double-crested cormorant, Phalacrocorax auritus WL, CSD2 Very close
Brandt’s cormorant, Phalacrocorax penicillatus BCC Nearby
Mountain plover, Charadrius montanus BCC, SSC Yes In region
Heermann’s gull, Larus heermanni BCC In region
Western gull, Larus occidentalis BCC Very close
California gull, Larus californicus BCC, WL, CSD2 Very close
Turkey vulture, Cathartes aura BOP, CSD 1 Very close
Osprey, Pandion haliaetus WL, BOP Very close
Bald eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGEPA, BCC, CFP, CSD1 Yes In region
Golden eagle, Aquila chrysaetos BGEPA, BCC, CFP, CSD1 Yes Very close
Ferruginous hawk, Buteo regalis BOP, WL, CSD1 Yes In region
4
Common name, Species name
Status1
Covered
by MSCP
take
permit
Occurrence
likelihood
based on
databases
Swainson’s hawk, Buteo swainsoni CT, BOP, CSD1 Yes Nearby
Zone-tailed hawk, Buteo albonotatus BOP In region
Red-tailed hawk, Buteo jamaicensis BOP Very close
Red-shouldered hawk, Buteo lineatus BOP, CSD1 Very close
White-tailed kite, Elanus leucurus CFP, WL, BOP, CSD1 Very close
Northern harrier, Circus hudsonicus BCC, SSC3, BOP, CSD1 Yes Very close
Sharp-shinned hawk, Accipiter striatus BOP, CSD1 Very close
Cooper’s hawk, Accipiter cooperi WL, BOP, CSD1 Yes Very close
American kestrel, Falco sparverius BOP Very close
Merlin, Falco columbarius WL, BOP, CSD2 Very close
Peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus CFP, BCC, BOP, CSD1 Yes Very close
Prairie falcon, Falco mexicanus BCC, WL, BOP, CSD1 In region
Barn owl, Tyto alba BOP, CSD2 Very close
Short-eared owl, Asio flammeus BCC, SSC3, CSD1 In region
Great-horned owl, Bubo virginianus BOP Very close
Western burrowing owl, Athene cunicularia BCC, SSC2, BOP, CSD1 Yes Very close
Western screech-owl, Megascops kennicotti BOP In region
Black swift, Cypseloides niger BCC, CSD2 In region
Vaux’s swift, Chaetura vauxi SSC2 Very close
Costa’s hummingbird, Calypte costae Very close
Allen’s hummingbird, Selasphorus sasin BCC Very close
Lewis’s woodpecker, Melanerpes lewis BCC, CSD1 In region
Nuttall’s woodpecker, Picoides nuttallii BCC Very close
Willow flycatcher, Empidonax traillii CE, BCC Nearby
Olive-sided flycatcher, Contopus cooperi BCC, SSC2, CSD2 Very close
Vermilion flycatcher, Pyrocephalus rubinus SSC2, CSD1 Very close
Loggerhead shrike, Lanius ludovicianus BCC, SSC2, CSD1 Very close
California horned lark, Eremophila alpestris actia WL, CSD2 Very close
San Diego cactus wren, Campylorhynchs brunneicapillus sandiegensis BCC, SSC1, CSD1 Nearby
5
Common name, Species name
Status1
Covered
by MSCP
take
permit
Occurrence
likelihood
based on
databases
Clark’s marsh wren, Cistothorus palustris clarkae SSC2 Very close
Least Bell’s vireo, Vireo belli pusillus FE, CE, CSD1 Yes Very close
Purple martin, Progne subis SSC2, CSD1 In region
Oak titmouse, Baeolophus inornatus BCC In region
Wrentit, Chamaea fasciata BCC Very close
California gnatcatcher, Polioptila c. californica CT, SSC, CSD1 Yes Very close
Western bluebird, Sialia mexicana CSD2 Yes Very close
California thrasher, Toxostoma redivivum BCC Very close
Yellow warbler, Setophaga petechia SSC2, CSD2 Very close
Yellow-breasted chat, Icteria virens SSC3, CSD1 Very close
Common yellowthroat, Geothlypis trichas BCC Very close
Summer tanager, Piranga rubra SSC1, CSD2 Nearby
Oregon vesper sparrow, Pooecetes gramineus affinis SSC2 Very close
Bell’s sage sparrow, Amphispiza b. belli WL, CSD1 Very close
Black-chinned sparrow, Spizella atrogularis BCC In region
Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow, Aimophila ruficeps
canescens
BCC, WL, CSD1 Yes Very close
Grasshopper sparrow, Ammodramus savannarum SSC2, CSD1 Very close
Bullock’s oriole, Icterus bullockii BCC Very close
Tricolored blackbird, Agelaius tricolor CT, BCC, CSD1 Yes Very close
Yellow-headed blackbird, Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus SSC3 Very close
Lawrence’s goldfinch, Spinus lawrencei BCC Very close
Pallid bat, Antrozous pallidus SSC, WBWG H, CSD2 In region
Townsend’s western big-eared bat, Plecotus t. townsendii SSC, WBWG H, CSD2 In region
Western red bat, Lasiurus blossevillii SSC, WBWG H, CSD2 In region
Hoary bat, Lasiurus cinereus WBWG M In region
Western yellow bat, Lasiurus xanthinus SSC, WBWG H In region
Small-footed myotis, Myotis cililabrum WBWG M, CSD2 In region
Miller’s myotis, Myotis evotis WBWG M, CSD2 In range
6
Common name, Species name
Status1
Covered
by MSCP
take
permit
Occurrence
likelihood
based on
databases
Fringed myotis, Myotis thysanodes WBWG H, CSD2 In range
Long-legged myotis, Myotis volans WBWG H, CSD2 In region
Yuma myotis, Myotis yumanensis SSC, WBWG LM, CSD2 In region
Western mastiff bat, Eumops perotis SSC, WBWG H, CSD2 In region
Pocketed free‐tailed bat, Nyctinomops femorosaccus SSC, WBWG M, CSD2 In region
American badger, Taxidea taxus SSC, CSD2 Yes In region
Dulzura pocket mouse, Chaetodipus californicus femoralis SSC, CSD2 In range
Northwestern San Diego pocket mouse, Chaetodipus fallax SSC, CSD2 In range
Los Angeles pocket mouse, Perognathus longimembris brevinasus SSC, CSD2 In range
San Diego desert woodrat, Neotoma lepida intermedia SSC, CSD2 In region
San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit, Lepus californicus
bennettii
SSC, CSD2 In region
Southern mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus fuliginatus CSD2 yes In region
1 Listed as FT or FE = federal threatened or endangered, BCC = U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bird of Conservation
Concern, CT or CE = California threatened or endangered, SSC = California species of special concern (not threatened
with extinction, but rare, very restricted in range, declining throughout range, peripheral portion of species' range,
associated with habitat that is declining in extent), CFP = California Fully Protected (CDFG Code 3511), BOP = California
Fish and Game Code 3503.5 (Birds of Prey), and SSC1, SSC2 and SSC3 = California Bird Species of Special Concern
priorities 1, 2 and 3, respectively (Shuford and Gardali 2008), and WL = Taxa to Watch List (Shuford and Gardali 2008),
WBWG = Western Bat Working Group listing as low, moderate or high priority, CSD1 and CSD2 = Group 1 = Group 1 and
Group 2 species on County of San Diego Sensitive Animal List (County of San Diego 2010).
7
Figure 1. Change in land cover around the project site (red polygon) from 1985 (left) to 2011 (middle) to 2021 (right).
1985
2011 2021
8
(2) DECLINE OF WILDLIFE
Another substantial change in circumstances was the recent report that North American
birds have suffered a 29% decline in overall abundance over the past half century
(Rosenberg et al. 2019). This stunning loss, which remained unknown at the time of the
2014 FEIR, poses dire ecological and economic consequences that have yet to be fully
understood, but which must be considered in any serious cumulative impact analysis.
Rosenberg et al. (2019) attributed the 29% loss of birds primarily to habitat loss and
habitat fragmentation, which I will address below. The finding of Rosenberg et al.
(2019) was reported at about the same time California’s Governor signed AB 454, which
amended California Fish and Game Code to protect most California birds. A new
project-specific EIR is needed to address the project’s direct and cumulative impacts on
birds.
Mammals, reptiles and amphibians are also declining, as are special-status species of
plants. Evidence of these declines is available in the literature at species-specific levels.
In the face of these declines, greater effort is needed in surveys and analyses of potential
impacts, as well as greater attention to mitigation.
(3) CHANGED STATUTES AND LISTINGS
The overall decline in bird abundance across North America has also included declines
in special-status species. These declines prompted recent changes in statutes and
listings. As examples, neither Bullock’s oriole nor northern harrier were US Fish and
Wildlife Bird Species of Conservation Concern in 2007, but they became so since then.
Another change was the listings of conservation priority assigned to species of bats by
the Western Bat Working Group. Such listings were not available at the time of the
1990s-2011 surveys in support of the 2014 FEIR.
Table 1 identifies the most recent changes to special status assigned to species since
2014. Thirteen species have undergone recent changes in status, including tricolored
blackbird, which was designated as threatened under the California Endangered Species
Act, and Crotches bumble bee, which was designated a Candidate for California
Endangered, and Monarch, which was designated a federal candidate for listing.
Circumstances have changed for the worse for California’s wildlife, and for wildlife at
the project site specifically. These changed circumstances warrant the preparation of a
new project-specific EIR.
Another change in statute was the recent amendment to California Fish and Game Code
section to protect most California birds (AB 454, signed by the Governor on 27
September 2019). This amendment adds California protections to birds protected by the
federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It covers most of the bird species documented at or
near the project site, as well as most of the birds recently reported on eBird, which I
discuss next.
9
(4) NEW RESEARCH AND NEW DATA BASES
Another development since the biological surveys of the 1990s through 2011 and since
the 2014 FEIR has been the proliferation in use of electronic data bases into which
members of the public report detections of wildlife. These data bases have rapidly
added to the scientific body of knowledge on the distribution of wildlife species. Many
papers in peer-reviewed journals have been informed by these data bases. No impact
assessment should be made without consulting these data for occurrence records at and
nearby a proposed project site. However, no such use of these data bases helped to
inform the 2014 FEIR because they were not yet ready.
According to eBird and iNaturalist records, 95 special-status species of wildlife have
been detected nearby or within the region of the project site (Table 1). Half of the
species in Table 1 have been recorded as occurring within 1.5 miles of the site (‘Very
close’ in Table 1). Six of the species in Table 1 were reported has having occurred
between 1.5 and 3 miles of the site. Thirty-four of the species in Table 1 were reported to
have occurred within about 30 miles of the site. According to the growing data bases
that have since become available following the 2014 FEIR, the site is inherently rich in
wildlife and it is rich in special-status species of wildlife. Greater use of the new data
bases is needed to appropriately analyze the project’s potential impacts to wildlife. A
new project-specific EIR is warranted.
(5) HABITAT LOSS AND HABITAT FRAGMENTATION
Another changed circumstance is the diminished availability of open space to wildlife in
the region of the project site since the 1990s-2011 biological surveys that were
completed in support of the 2014 FEIR. Given the recently documented 29% decline in
overall bird abundance across North America over 48 years – a decline driven by
multiple factors including habitat loss and habitat fragmentation (Rosenberg et al.
2019), an analysis of the effects of habitat loss and habitat fragmentation is warranted.
Since the 1990s to 2011, much of the landscape around the project site has been
converted to residential, commercial and industrial uses (Figure 1). Large tracts of open
space have been lost to development. Open space that in the 1990s to 2011 formed
contiguous wildlife travel routes across and inclusive of the project site, has since been
severely constrained. The project would further fragment terrestrial travel routes that
currently remain available to wildlife. The Design Review ignores this changed
circumstance caused by habitat fragmentation, which also likely concentrated use of the
project site by wildlife.
(6) ROAD MORTALITY
Scientific advances in understanding of road traffic impacts to wildlife represent another
important changed circumstance. But this issue also represents a shortfall of the Design
Review. A fundamental shortfall of the Design Review includes its failure to analyze the
impacts of project-generated vehicle miles traveled (VMT), which is a significant impact
of the type of project proposed and that was not addressed in the 2014 FEIR. Analysis
10
of VMT is a new CEQA requirement since the 2014 FEIR, which is also very useful for
informing an analysis of wildlife mortality caused by automobile traffic on roads. Many
animals that would be killed by project-generated traffic would die far from the project’s
construction footprint as wildlife cross roads to go about their business of foraging,
patrolling home ranges, dispersing and migrating (Photos 1 ‒ 4). In addition to the
animals that would be struck and killed by automobiles on the project site, many would
also be killed while crossing roads traversed by cars and trucks originating from or
headed toward the project site. The project’s impacts to wildlife would reach as far from
the project as cars and trucks travel to or from the project site, and would affect many
more species than those listed in Table 1.
Photo 1. A Gambel’s quail dashes
across a road on 3 April 2021. Such
road crossings are usually successful,
but too often prove fatal to the animal.
Photo by Noriko Smallwood.
Photo 2. Great-tailed grackle walks onto
a rural road in Imperial County, 4
February 2022.
Photo 3. A mourning dove killed by
vehicle traffic on a California road.
Photo by Noriko Smallwood, 21 June
2020.
11
Photo 4. Raccoon killed on Road 31 just east of
Highway 505 in Solano County. Photo taken on
10 November 2018.
Vehicle collisions have accounted for the deaths of many thousands of reptile,
amphibian, mammal, bird, and arthropod fauna, and the impacts have often been found
to be significant at the population level (Forman et al. 2003). Across North America
traffic impacts have taken devastating tolls on wildlife (Forman et al. 2003). In Canada,
3,562 birds were estimated killed per 100 km of road per year (Bishop and Brogan
2013), and the US estimate of avian mortality on roads is 2,200 to 8,405 deaths per 100
km per year, or 89 million to 340 million total per year (Loss et al. 2014). Local impacts
can be more intense than nationally.
In a recent study of traffic-caused wildlife mortality, investigators found 1,275 carcasses
of 49 species of mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles over 15 months of searches
along a 2.5 mile stretch of Vasco Road in Contra Costa County, California (Mendelsohn
et al. 2009). Using carcass detection trials performed on land immediately adjacent to
the traffic mortality study (Brown et al. 2016) to adjust the found fatalities for the
proportion of fatalities not found due to scavenger removal and searcher error, the
estimated traffic-caused fatalities was 12,187. This fatality estimate translates to a rate
of 3,900 wild animals per mile per year killed. In terms comparable to the national
estimates, the estimates from the Mendelsohn et al. (2009) study would translate to
243,740 animals killed per 100 km of road per year, or 29 times that of Loss et al.’s
(2014) upper bound estimate and 68 times the Canadian estimate. An analysis is
needed of whether increased traffic generated by the project site would similarly result
in local impacts on wildlife.
Predicting project-generated traffic impacts to wildlife
Neither the 2014 FEIR nor the 2022 Design Review predicts VMT. To demonstrate the
potential level of impact to wildlife from project-generated traffic, I applied the mean
predicted VMT/square foot of warehouse floor space among 26 other warehouse
projects I reviewed over the last several years. This mean was 5.228563. This mean
applied to the 201,200 square feet of floor space of the proposed project predicts
1,051,987 vehicle miles traveled per year as a result of the proposed project. Despite the
12
obvious risk to wildlife, the 2022 Design Review does not address impacts to wildlife
caused by vehicles traveling to and from the project site.
For wildlife vulnerable to front-end collisions and crushing under tires, road mortality
can be predicted from the study of Mendelsohn et al. (2009) as a basis, although it
would be helpful to have the availability of more studies like that of Mendelsohn et al.
(2009) at additional locations. My analysis of the Mendelsohn et al. (2009) data
resulted in an estimated 3,900 animals killed per mile along a county road in Contra
Costa County. Two percent of the estimated number of fatalities were birds, and the
balance was composed of 34% mammals (many mice and pocket mice, but also ground
squirrels, desert cottontails, striped skunks, American badgers, raccoons, and others),
52.3% amphibians (large numbers of California tiger salamanders and California red -
legged frogs, but also Sierran treefrogs, western toads, arboreal salamanders, slender
salamanders and others), and 11.7% reptiles (many western fence lizards, but also
skinks, alligator lizards, and snakes of various species).
During the Mendelsohn et al. (2009) study, 19,500 cars traveled Vasco Road daily, so
the vehicle miles that contributed to my estimate of non-volant fatalities was 19,500 cars
and trucks × 2.5 miles × 365 days/year × 1.25 years = 22,242,187.5 vehicle miles per
12,187 wildlife fatalities, or 1,825 vehicle miles per fatality. Based on my review of other
projects, I predict this project would generate 1,051,987 vehicle miles per year (see
above), which divided by the 1,825 miles per fatality, would predict 576 wildlife fatalities
per year. Operations over 50 years would accumulate 28,800 wildlife
fatalities. It remains unknown whether and to what degree vehicle tires contribute to
carcass removals from the roadway, thereby contributing a negative bias to the fatality
estimates I made from the Mendelsohn et al. (2009) fatality counts. The Project’s toll
on wildlife could be even higher than I predict. Neither the 2014 FEIR nor the 2022
Design Review address this impact.
Based on my assumptions and simple calculations, the project-generated traffic would
cause substantial, significant impacts to wildlife. A new project-specific EIR should be
prepared to analyze this impact. Mitigation measures to improve wildlife safety along
roads are available and are feasible, and they need exploration for their suitability with
the proposed project.
MITIGATION
(7) MSHCP Mitigation
Payment of a mitigation fee to the San Diego County MSCP would fail to benefit most of
the species in Table 1, 81% of which are not covered by the incidental take permit issued
to the MSCP. Of the 13 special-status species in Table 1 whose status chanced since the
2014 FEIR, 10 (77%) are not covered by the MSCP. Circumstances have changed,
requiring additional measures to mitigate project impacts to special-status species of
wildlife.
13
Thank you for your attention,
______________________
Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D.
REFERENCES CITED
Bishop, C. A. and J. M. Brogan. 2013. Estimates of avian mortality attributed to vehicle
collisions in Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8:2.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00604-080202.
Brown, K., K. S. Smallwood, J. Szewczak, and B. Karas. 2016. Final 2012-2015 Report
Avian and Bat Monitoring Project Vasco Winds, LLC. Prepared for NextEra Energy
Resources, Livermore, California.
CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2012. Staff report on burrowing
owl mitigation. Sacramento, California.
City of Chula Vista. 2014. Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch
University Villages Project. SCH No. 2013071077. Chula Vista, California.
Forman, T. T., D. Sperling, J. A. Bisonette, A. P. Clevenger, C. D. Cutshall, V. H. Dale, L.
Fahrig, R. France, C. R. Goldman, K. Heanue, J. A. Jones, F. J. Swanson, T.
Turrentine, and T. C. Winter. 2003. Road Ecology. Island Press, Covello,
California.
Loss, S. R., T. Will, and P. P. Marra. 2014. Estimation of Bird-Vehicle Collision
Mortality on U.S. Roads. Journal of Wildlife Management 78:763-771.
Mendelsohn, M., W. Dexter, E. Olson, and S. Weber. 2009. Vasco Road wildlife
movement study report. Report to Contra Costa County Public Works Department,
Martinez, California.
Rosenberg, K. V., A. M. Dokter, P. J. Blancher, J. R. Sauer, A. C. Smith, P. A. Smith, J. C.
Stanton, A. Panjabi , L. Helft , M. Parr, and P. P. Marra. 2019. Decline of the North
American avifauna. Science 10.1126/science.aaw1313 (2019).
Shuford, W. D., and T. Gardali, [eds.]. 2008. California bird species of special concern: a
ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of
immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western
Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California.
Sogge, M. K., D. Ahlers, and S. J. Sferra. 2010. A natural history summary and survey
protocol for the southwestern willow flycatcher: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques
and Methods 2A-10, 38 p.
1
Kenneth Shawn Smallwood
Curriculum Vitae
3108 Finch Street Born May 3, 1963 in
Davis, CA 95616 Sacramento, California.
Phone (530) 756-4598 Married, father of two.
Cell (530) 601-6857
puma@dcn.org
Ecologist
Expertise
• Finding solutions to controversial problems related to wildlife interactions with human
industry, infrastructure, and activities;
• Wildlife monitoring and field study using GPS, thermal imaging, behavior surveys;
• Using systems analysis and experimental design principles to identify meaningful
ecological patterns that inform management decisions.
Education
Ph.D. Ecology, University of California, Davis. September 1990.
M.S. Ecology, University of California, Davis. June 1987.
B.S. Anthropology, University of California, Davis. June 1985.
Corcoran High School, Corcoran, California. June 1981.
Experience
y 477 professional publications, including:
y 81 peer reviewed publications
y 24 in non-reviewed proceedings
y 370 reports, declarations, posters and book reviews
y 8 in mass media outlets
y 87 public presentations of research results at meetings
y Reviewed many professional papers and reports
y Testified in 4 court cases.
Editing for scientific journals: Guest Editor, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2012-2013, of invited papers
representing international views on the impacts of wind energy on wildlife and how to mitigate
the impacts. Associate Editor, Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2004 to 30 June 2007.
Editorial Board Member, Environmental Management, 10/1999 to 8/2004. Associate Editor,
Biological Conservation, 9/1994 to 9/1995.
Member, Alameda County Scientific Review Committee (SRC), August 2006 to April 2011. The
Smallwood CV
2
five-member committee investigated causes of bird and bat collisions in the Altamont Pass
Wind Resource Area, and recommended mitigation and monitoring measures. The SRC
reviewed the science underlying the Alameda County Avian Protection Program, and advised
the County on how to reduce wildlife fatalities.
Consulting Ecologist, 2004-2007, California Energy Commission (CEC). Provided consulting
services as needed to the CEC on renewable energy impacts, monitoring and research, and
produced several reports. Also collaborated with Lawrence-Livermore National Lab on research
to understand and reduce wind turbine impacts on wildlife.
Consulting Ecologist, 1999-2013, U.S. Navy. Performed endangered species surveys, hazardous
waste site monitoring, and habitat restoration for the endangered San Joaquin kangaroo rat,
California tiger salamander, California red-legged frog, California clapper rail, western
burrowing owl, salt marsh harvest mouse, and other species at Naval Air Station Lemoore;
Naval Weapons Station, Seal Beach, Detachment Concord; Naval Security Group Activity,
Skaggs Island; National Radio Transmitter Facility, Dixon; and, Naval Outlying Landing Field
Imperial Beach.
Fulbright Research Fellow, Indonesia, 1988. Tested use of new sampling methods for numerical
monitoring of Sumatran tiger and six other species of endemic felids, and evaluated methods
used by other researchers.
Peer Reviewed Publications
Smallwood, K. S. 2017. Long search intervals under-estimate bird and bat fatalities caused by
wind turbines. Wildlife Society Bulletin 41:224-230.
Smallwood, K. S. 2017. The challenges of addressing wildlife impacts when repowering wind
energy projects. Pages 175-187 in Köppel, J., Editor, Wind Energy and Wildlife Impacts:
Proceedings from the CWW2015 Conference. Springer. Cham, Switzerland.
May, R., Gill, A. B., Köppel, J. Langston, R. H.W., Reichenbach, M., Scheidat, M., Smallwood, S.,
Voigt, C. C., Hüppop, O., and Portman, M. 2017. Future research directions to reconcile wind
turbine–wildlife interactions. Pages 255-276 in Köppel, J., Editor, Wind Energy and Wildlife
Impacts: Proceedings from the CWW2015 Conference. Springer. Cham, Switzerland.
Smallwood, K. S. 2017. Monitoring birds. M. Perrow, Ed., Wildlife and Wind Farms - Conflicts
and Solutions, Volume 2. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter, United Kingdom. www.bit.ly/2v3cR9Q
Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, and D. A. Bell. 2017. Siting to Minimize Raptor Collisions: an
example from the Repowering Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. M. Perrow, Ed., Wildlife
and Wind Farms - Conflicts and Solutions, Volume 2. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter, United
Kingdom. www.bit.ly/2v3cR9Q
Johnson, D. H., S. R. Loss, K. S. Smallwood, W. P. Erickson. 2016. Avian fatalities at wind
energy facilities in North America: A comparison of recent approaches. Human–Wildlife
Interactions 10(1):7-18.
Smallwood CV
3
Sadar, M. J., D. S.-M. Guzman, A. Mete, J. Foley, N. Stephenson, K. H. Rogers, C. Grosset, K. S.
Smallwood, J. Shipman, A. Wells, S. D. White, D. A. Bell, and M. G. Hawkins. 2015. Mange
Caused by a novel Micnemidocoptes mite in a Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos). Journal of
Avian Medicine and Surgery 29(3):231-237.
Smallwood, K. S. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and corridors. Pages 84-101 in M. L. Morrison and
H. A. Mathewson, Eds., Wildlife habitat conservation: concepts, challenges, and solutions. John
Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mete, A., N. Stephenson, K. Rogers, M. G. Hawkins, M. Sadar, D. Guzman, D. A. Bell, J. Shipman,
A. Wells, K. S. Smallwood, and J. Foley. 2014. Emergence of Knemidocoptic mange in wild
Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in California. Emerging Infectious Diseases 20(10):1716-
1718.
Smallwood, K. S. 2013. Introduction: Wind-energy development and wildlife conservation.
Wildlife Society Bulletin 37: 3-4.
Smallwood, K. S. 2013. Comparing bird and bat fatality-rate estimates among North American
wind-energy projects. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37:19-33. + Online Supplemental Material.
Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, J. Mount, and R. C. E. Culver. 2013. Nesting Burrowing Owl
Abundance in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. Wildlife Society Bulletin:
37:787-795.
Smallwood, K. S., D. A. Bell, B. Karas, and S. A. Snyder. 2013. Response to Huso and Erickson
Comments on Novel Scavenger Removal Trials. Journal of Wildlife Management 77: 216-225.
Bell, D. A., and K. S. Smallwood. 2010. Birds of prey remain at risk. Science 330:913.
Smallwood, K. S., D. A. Bell, S. A. Snyder, and J. E. DiDonato. 2010. Novel scavenger removal
trials increase estimates of wind turbine-caused avian fatality rates. Journal of Wildlife
Management 74: 1089-1097 + Online Supplemental Material.
Smallwood, K. S., L. Neher, and D. A. Bell. 2009. Map-based repowering and reorganization of a
wind resource area to minimize burrowing owl and other bird fatalities. Energies 2009(2):915-
943. http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/2/4/915
Smallwood, K. S. and B. Nakamoto. 2009. Impacts of West Nile Virus Epizootic on Yellow-Billed
Magpie, American Crow, and other Birds in the Sacramento Valley, California. The Condor
111:247-254.
Smallwood, K. S., L. Rugge, and M. L. Morrison. 2009. Influence of Behavior on Bird Mortality in
Wind Energy Developments: The Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. Journal of
Wildlife Management 73:1082-1098.
Smallwood, K. S. and B. Karas. 2009. Avian and Bat Fatality Rates at Old-Generation and
Smallwood CV
4
Repowered Wind Turbines in California. Journal of Wildlife Management 73:1062-1071.
Smallwood, K. S. 2008. Wind power company compliance with mitigation plans in the Altamont
Pass Wind Resource Area. Environmental & Energy Law Policy Journal 2(2):229-285.
Smallwood, K. S., C. G. Thelander. 2008. Bird Mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource
Area, California. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:215-223.
Smallwood, K. S. 2007. Estimating wind turbine-caused bird mortality. Journal of Wildlife
Management 71:2781-2791.
Smallwood, K. S., C. G. Thelander, M. L. Morrison, and L. M. Rugge. 2007. Burrowing owl
mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:1513-
1524.
Cain, J. W. III, K. S. Smallwood, M. L. Morrison, and H. L. Loffland. 2005. Influence of mammal
activity on nesting success of Passerines. J. Wildlife Management 70:522-531.
Smallwood, K.S. 2002. Habitat models based on numerical comparisons. Pages 83-95 in
Predicting species occurrences: Issues of scale and accuracy, J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M.
Morrison, M. Raphael, J. Haufler, and B. Wall, editors. Island Press, Covello, California.
Morrison, M. L., K. S. Smallwood, and L. S. Hall. 2002. Creating habitat through plant relocation:
Lessons from Valley elderberry longhorn beetle mitigation. Ecological Restoration 21: 95-100.
Zhang, M., K. S. Smallwood, and E. Anderson. 2002. Relating indicators of ecological health and
integrity to assess risks to sustainable agriculture and native biota. Pages 757-768 in D.J.
Rapport, W.L. Lasley, D.E. Rolston, N.O. Nielsen, C.O. Qualset, and A.B. Damania (eds.),
Managing for Healthy Ecosystems, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida USA.
Wilcox, B. A., K. S. Smallwood, and J. A. Kahn. 2002. Toward a forest Capital Index. Pages 285-
298 in D.J. Rapport, W.L. Lasley, D.E. Rolston, N.O. Nielsen, C.O. Qualset, and A.B. Damania
(eds.), Managing for Healthy Ecosystems, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida USA.
Smallwood, K.S. 2001. The allometry of density within the space used by populations of
Mammalian Carnivores. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79:1634-1640.
Smallwood, K.S., and T.R. Smith. 2001. Study design and interpretation of Sorex density
estimates. Annales Zoologi Fennici 38:141-161.
Smallwood, K.S., A. Gonzales, T. Smith, E. West, C. Hawkins, E. Stitt, C. Keckler, C. Bailey, and
K. Brown. 2001. Suggested standards for science applied to conservation issues. Transactions
of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 36:40-49.
Geng, S., Yixing Zhou, Minghua Zhang, and K. Shawn Smallwood. 2001. A Sustainable Agro-
ecological Solution to Water Shortage in North China Plain (Huabei Plain). Environmental
Planning and Management 44:345-355.
Smallwood CV
5
Smallwood, K. Shawn, Lourdes Rugge, Stacia Hoover, Michael L. Morrison, Carl Thelander. 2001.
Intra- and inter-turbine string comparison of fatalities to animal burrow densities at Altamont
Pass. Pages 23-37 in S. S. Schwartz, ed., Proceedings of the National Avian-Wind Power
Planning Meeting IV. RESOLVE, Inc., Washington, D.C.
Smallwood, K.S., S. Geng, and M. Zhang. 2001. Comparing pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae)
density in alfalfa stands to assess management and conservation goals in northern California.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 87: 93-109.
Smallwood, K. S. 2001. Linking habitat restoration to meaningful units of animal demography.
Restoration Ecology 9:253-261.
Smallwood, K. S. 2000. A crosswalk from the Endangered Species Act to the HCP Handbook and
real HCPs. Environmental Management 26, Supplement 1:23-35.
Smallwood, K. S., J. Beyea and M. Morrison. 1999. Using the best scientific data for endangered
species conservation. Environmental Management 24:421-435.
Smallwood, K. S. 1999. Scale domains of abundance among species of Mammalian Carnivora.
Environmental Conservation 26:102-111.
Smallwood, K.S. 1999. Suggested study attributes for making useful population density estimates.
Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 35: 76-82.
Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 1999. Estimating burrow volume and excavation rate of
pocket gophers (Geomyidae). Southwestern Naturalist 44:173-183.
Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 1999. Spatial scaling of pocket gopher (Geomyidae)
density. Southwestern Naturalist 44:73-82.
Smallwood, K. S. 1999. Abating pocket gophers (Thomomys spp.) to regenerate forests in
clearcuts. Environmental Conservation 26:59-65.
Smallwood, K. S. 1998. Patterns of black bear abundance. Transactions of the Western Section of
the Wildlife Society 34:32-38.
Smallwood, K. S. 1998. On the evidence needed for listing northern goshawks (Accipter gentilis)
under the Endangered Species Act: a reply to Kennedy. J. Raptor Research 32:323-329.
Smallwood, K. S., B. Wilcox, R. Leidy, and K. Yarris. 1998. Indicators assessment for Habitat
Conservation Plan of Yolo County, California, USA. Environmental Management 22: 947-958.
Smallwood, K. S., M. L. Morrison, and J. Beyea. 1998. Animal burrowing attributes affecting
hazardous waste management. Environmental Management 22: 831-847.
Smallwood, K. S, and C. M. Schonewald. 1998. Study design and interpretation for mammalian
Smallwood CV
6
carnivore density estimates. Oecologia 113:474-491.
Zhang, M., S. Geng, and K. S. Smallwood. 1998. Nitrate contamination in groundwater of Tulare
County, California. Ambio 27(3):170-174.
Smallwood, K. S. and M. L. Morrison. 1997. Animal burrowing in the waste management zone of
Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Proceedings of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society
Meeting 33:88-97.
Morrison, M. L., K. S. Smallwood, and J. Beyea. 1997. Monitoring the dispersal of contaminants
by wildlife at nuclear weapons production and waste storage facilities. The Environmentalist
17:289-295.
Smallwood, K. S. 1997. Interpreting puma (Puma concolor) density estimates for theory and
management. Environmental Conservation 24(3):283-289.
Smallwood, K. S. 1997. Managing vertebrates in cover crops: a first study. American Journal of
Alternative Agriculture 11:155-160.
Smallwood, K. S. and S. Geng. 1997. Multi-scale influences of gophers on alfalfa yield and
quality. Field Crops Research 49:159-168.
Smallwood, K. S. and C. Schonewald. 1996. Scaling population density and spatial pattern for
terrestrial, mammalian carnivores. Oecologia 105:329-335.
Smallwood, K. S., G. Jones, and C. Schonewald. 1996. Spatial scaling of allometry for terrestrial,
mammalian carnivores. Oecologia 107:588-594.
Van Vuren, D. and K. S. Smallwood. 1996. Ecological management of vertebrate pests in
agricultural systems. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 13:41-64.
Smallwood, K. S., B. J. Nakamoto, and S. Geng. 1996. Association analysis of raptors on an
agricultural landscape. Pages 177-190 in D.M. Bird, D.E. Varland, and J.J. Negro, eds., Raptors
in human landscapes. Academic Press, London.
Erichsen, A. L., K. S. Smallwood, A. M. Commandatore, D. M. Fry, and B. Wilson. 1996. White-
tailed Kite movement and nesting patterns in an agricultural landscape. Pages 166-176 in D. M.
Bird, D. E. Varland, and J. J. Negro, eds., Raptors in human landscapes. Academic Press,
London.
Smallwood, K. S. 1995. Scaling Swainson's hawk population density for assessing habitat-use across
an agricultural landscape. J. Raptor Research 29:172-178.
Smallwood, K. S. and W. A. Erickson. 1995. Estimating gopher populations and their abatement in
forest plantations. Forest Science 41:284-296.
Smallwood, K. S. and E. L. Fitzhugh. 1995. A track count for estimating mountain lion Felis
Smallwood CV
7
concolor californica population trend. Biological Conservation 71:251-259
Smallwood, K. S. 1994. Site invasibility by exotic birds and mammals. Biological Conservation
69:251-259.
Smallwood, K. S. 1994. Trends in California mountain lion populations. Southwestern Naturalist
39:67-72.
Smallwood, K. S. 1993. Understanding ecological pattern and process by association and order.
Acta Oecologica 14(3):443-462.
Smallwood, K. S. and E. L. Fitzhugh. 1993. A rigorous technique for identifying individual
mountain lions Felis concolor by their tracks. Biological Conservation 65:51-59.
Smallwood, K. S. 1993. Mountain lion vocalizations and hunting behavior. The Southwestern
Naturalist 38:65-67.
Smallwood, K. S. and T. P. Salmon. 1992. A rating system for potential exotic vertebrate pests.
Biological Conservation 62:149-159.
Smallwood, K. S. 1990. Turbulence and the ecology of invading species. Ph.D. Thesis, University
of California, Davis.
EXHIBIT B
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
mhagemann@swape.com
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
prosenfeld@swape.com
February 3, 2022
Richard Drury
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
Subject: Comments on the Heritage Industrial Center Project (SCH No. 2013071077)
Dear Mr. Drury,
We have reviewed the January 2022 Staff Report (“Staff Report”) for the Heritage Industrial Center
Project (“Project”) located in the City of Chula Vista (“City”). The Project proposes to construct three
industrial buildings totaling 201,200-SF as well as 287 parking spaces on the 11.6-acre site.
Our review concludes that the Staff Report fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s air quality, health
risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, a full CEQA analysis must be prepared to adequately
assess and mitigate the potential hazards and hazardous materials, air quality, health risk, and
greenhouse gas impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment.
Air Quality Failure to Adequately Evaluate Air Quality Impacts
The Staff Report claims that no further environmental review is required for the Project. Specifically, the
Staff Report states:
“The Project was adequately covered in previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR 13-01) (Sch No. 2013071077) prepared for the Otay Ranch University Villages Project
Comprehensive Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendment and certified by the City Council
on December 2, 2014. Thus, no further environmental review is required” (p. 1).
As demonstrated above, the Staff Report claims the Project was adequately evaluated in the previously
certified 2013 Final Environmental Impact Report (“2013 FEIR”), which concluded that the Project would
2
have significant-and-unavoidable air quality impacts. However, the Staff Report’s claim that no further
environmental review is warranted is incorrect. According to CEQA Guidelines § 15152:
“(f) A later EIR shall be required when the initial study or other analysis finds that the later
project may cause significant effects on the environment that were not adequately addressed in
the prior EIR.”
Furthermore, in Communities for a Better Environment v. Cal. Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th
98, 122-25, the court of appeal held that when a “first tier” EIR admits a significant, unavoidable
environmental impact, then the agency must prepare second tier EIRs for later projects to ensure that
those unmitigated impacts are “mitigated or avoided.” (Id.) The court reasoned that the unmitigated
impacts were not “adequately addressed” in the first tier EIR since it was not “mitigated or avoided.”
(Id.) Thus, significant effects disclosed in first tier EIRs will trigger second tier EIRs unless such effects
have been “adequately addressed,” in a way that ensures the effects will be “mitigated or avoided.” (Id.)
A second tier EIR is required especially where the impact still cannot be fully mitigated and a statement
of overriding considerations will be required. The court explained, “The requirement of a statement of
overriding considerations is central to CEQA’s role as a public accountability statute; it requires public
officials, in approving environmental detrimental projects, to justify their decisions based on
counterbalancing social, economic or other benefits, and to point to substantial evidence in support.”
(Id. At 124-25.)
As discussed in the following sections of this letter, the proposed Project results in potentially significant
air quality and health risk impacts. As a result, further environmental review is required in a second tier
EIR in order to adequately address and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the
Project may have on the surrounding environment. Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact
In an effort to accurately estimate Project’s construction-related and operational emissions, we utilized
CalEEMod.2020.4.0, as well as the Project-specific information provided in the associated documents.
CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use
type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type, and typical equipment associated with project
type. In our model, we included 201,200-SF of “General Heavy Industry” and 287 spaces of “Parking Lot”
(p. 2). Finally, we assumed that the Project would be located within Climate Zone 13 1 and the Project’s
utilities would be provided by San Diego Gas & Electric.2 All other values were left as default.
Our updated analysis estimates that the Project’s construction-related ROG emissions exceed the
applicable SDAPCD threshold of 137 pounds per day (“lbs/day”) (see table below).
1 “Appendix F Climate Zones Lookup.” CAPCOA, September 2016, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/upgrades/2016.3/07_appendix-f2016-3-1.pdf?sfvrsn=2, p.
F-10.
2 “Maps.” San Diego Gas and Electric, November 2014, available at: https://www.sdge.com/maps.
3
SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Model
Construction
ROG
(lbs/day)
SWAPE 237.4
SDAPCD Threshold 137
Exceeds? Yes
As you can see in the excerpt above, the Project’s construction-related ROG emissions, as estimated by
SWAPE, exceed the applicable SDAPCD significance threshold. Thus, our model demonstrates that the
Project would result in a potentially significant air quality impact that was not previously identified or
adequately addressed. As a result, further environmental review is required in a second tier EIR in order
to adequately address and mitigate the potential air quality impacts that the Project may have on the
surrounding environment. Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated
As previously stated, the Staff Report claims that no further environmental review is required for the
Project. As such, the Staff Report fails to mention or evaluate the potential health risk impacts posed by
Project-generated toxic air contaminant (“TAC”) emissions whatsoever. However, this is incorrect for
three reasons.
First, construction of the proposed Project will produce emissions of diesel particulate matter (“DPM”)
through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment throughout the entire construction duration.
Furthermore, the proposed land uses will generate daily vehicle trips, which will generate additional
exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby sensitive receptors to DPM emissions. However, the
Staff Report fails to quantify Project-generated toxic air contaminant (“TAC”) emissions or indicate the
concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects. Thus, without making a
reasonable effort to connect the Project’s construction-related and operational TAC emissions to the
potential health risks posed to nearby receptors, the Staff Report is inconsistent with CEQA’s
requirement to correlate the increase in emissions generated by the Project with the potential adverse
impacts on human health.
Second, the State of California Department of Justice recommends the preparation of a quantitative
HRA pursuant to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization
responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, as well as local air district
guidelines.3 OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for
Preparation of Health Risk Assessments in February 2015.4 This guidance document describes the types
3 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental
Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/environment/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 6.
4 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/hotspots2015.html.
4
of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. The OEHHA document recommends that all short-
term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors. As
the Project’s construction duration exceeds the 2-month requirement set forth by OEHHA, it is clear that
the Project meets the threshold warranting a quantified HRA under OEHHA guidance. Furthermore, the
OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated
for the duration of the project and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to
estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”). Even though we
were not provided with the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project
will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, we recommend that health risk impacts from
Project operation also be evaluated, as a 30-year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 6-month
requirement set forth by OEHHA. These recommendations reflect the most recent state health risk
policies, and as such, we recommend that an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive
receptors from Project-generated DPM emissions be included in a second tier EIR for the Project.
Third, by claiming a less-than-significant impact without conducting a quantified construction or
operational HRA for nearby, existing sensitive receptors, the Staff Report fails to compare the Project’s
cumulative excess health risk impact to the applicable SDAPCD numeric threshold of 10 in one million. 5
Thus, in accordance with the most relevant guidance, an assessment of the health risk posed to nearby,
existing receptors from Project construction and operation should have been conducted. Screening-Level Analysis Indicates Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact
In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening
level air quality dispersion model.6 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the
OEHHA 7 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”)8 guidance as the
appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”). A Level 2 HRSA
utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind
concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an
unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling
approach is required prior to approval of the Project.
We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s construction and operational health risk impact to
residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM10 exhaust estimates from SWAPE’s CalEEMod output
files. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins
during the third trimester stage of life. SWAPE’s construction CalEEMod emissions indicate that
construction activities will generate approximately 213 pounds of DPM over the 447-day construction
5 REGULATION XII. TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS, San Diego Air Pollution Control District, available at:
https://www.sdapcd.org/content/dam/sdc/apcd/PDF/Misc/APCD_R1200.pdf, p. 6.
6 U.S. EPA (April 2011) AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model,
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo.pdf
7 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf
8 CAPCOA (July 2009) Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, http://www.capcoa.org/wp-
content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf.
5
period.9 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum
downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability
in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission
rate by the following equation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠�= 212.7 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 447 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑24 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔3,600 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 =𝟎𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00250 grams per second (“g/s”).
Subtracting the 447-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed
that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project’s operational
DPM for an additional 28.78 years. SWAPE’s operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational
activities will generate approximately 32 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the
same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate
for Project operation:
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠�= 31.6 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 365 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑24 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝐸𝐸𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔3,600 𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸=𝟎𝟎.𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.000455 g/s. Construction and
operation were simulated as a 11.6-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with approximate
dimensions of 306- by 153-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the
height of stacks of operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical
dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release.
An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction
distribution. The population of the City of Chula Vista was obtained from U.S. 2020 Census data.10
The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations
from the Project Site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annualized average
concentration of an air pollutant to be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10%.11
According to the Staff Report, the nearest sensitive receptor is located approximately 155 feet, or 47
meters, from the Project site (p. 15). However, review of the AERSCREEN output files demonstrates that
the maximally exposed receptor is located approximately 150 meters from the Project site. Thus, the
single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 2.108
µg/m3 DPM at approximately 150 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%,
we get an annualized average concentration of 0.2108 µg/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR. For
Project operation, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 0.3835 µg/m3 DPM at
9 See Attachment B for calculations.
10 “Chula Vista.” U.S. Census Bureau, 2020, available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0613392.
11 U.S. EPA (October 1992) Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources
Revised, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019_OCR.pdf.
6
approximately 150 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an
annualized average concentration of 0.03835 µg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR.
We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by
OEHHA, as recommended by SDAPCD.12 Consistent with the 447-day construction schedule, the
annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy
(0.25 years) and the first 0.97 years of the infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years). The annualized average
concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes
up the latter 1.03 years of the infantile stage of life, the entire child stage of life (2 – 16 years), and the
entire adult stage of life (16 – 30 years).
Consistent with OEHHA guidance, as recommended by SDACPD, we used Age Sensitivity Factors
(“ASF(s)”) to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of
air pollution.13, 14 According to this guidance, the quantified cancer risk should be multiplied by a factor
of ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and during the first two years of life (infant) as well as
multiplied by a factor of three during the child stage of life (2 – 16 years). Furthermore, in accordance
with guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used the 95th percentile breathing rates for infants.15 Finally,
consistent with OEHHA guidance, we used a Fraction of Time At Home (“FAH”) Value of 1 for the 3rd
trimester, infant, and child receptors.16 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 (mg/kg-day)-1 and an
averaging time of 25,550 days. The results of our calculations are shown in the tables below.
12 “Supplemental Guidelines for Submission of Rule 1200 Health Risk Assessments (HRAs).” SDAPCD, July 2019,
available at:
https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/apcd/PDF/Toxics_Program/APCD_1200_Supplemental_Guidel
ines.pdf.
13 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf.
14 “Supplemental Guidelines for Submission of Rule 1200 Health Risk Assessments (HRAs).” SDAPCD, July 2019,
available at:
https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/apcd/PDF/Toxics_Program/APCD_1200_Supplemental_Guidel
ines.pdf.
15 SCAQMD (Jun 2015) Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’
Information and Assessment Act, p. 19, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk-assessment/
ab2588-risk-assessment-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=6; see also OEHHA (Feb 2015) Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance
Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015
guidancemanual.pdf.
16 SCAQMD (Aug 2017) Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, and 212, p. 7, http://www.aqmd.gov/
docs/default-source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf.
7
The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor
Age Group Emissions
Source
Duration
(years)
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Breathing
Rate (L/kg-day)
Cancer Risk
(without ASFs*) ASF Cancer Risk
(with ASFs*)
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.2108 361 2.87E-07 10 2.87E-06
Construction 0.97 0.2108 1090 3.37E-06
Operation 1.03 0.03835 1090 6.46E-07
Infant
(Age 0 - 2) Total 2 4.02E-06 10 4.02E-05
Child
(Age 2 - 16) Operation 14 0.03835 572 4.63E-06 3 1.39E-05
Adult
(Age 16 - 30) Operation 14 0.03835 261 1.54E-06 1 1.54E-06
Lifetime 30 1.05E-05 5.85E-05
* We, along with CARB and SCAQMD, recommend using the more updated and health protective 2015 OEHHA guidance, which includes ASFs.
As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants,
children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 150 meters away, over the course of Project
construction and operation, utilizing ASFs, are approximately 2.87, 40.2, 13.9, and 1.54 in one million,
respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years), utilizing ASFs, is
approximately 58.5 in one million. The infant, child and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SDACPD
threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not identified or
adequately addressed.
Utilizing ASFs is the most conservative, health-protective analysis according to the most recent guidance
by OEHHA and reflects recommendations from the air district. Results without ASFs are presented in the
table above, although we do not recommend utilizing these values for health risk analysis. Regardless,
the excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR
located approximately 150 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, without
ASFs, are approximately 0.287, 4.02, 4.63, and 1.54 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk
over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years), without ASFs, is approximately 10.5 in one million.
The child and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SDAPCD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a
potentially significant impact not identified or adequately addressed. While we recommend the use of
ASFs, the Project’s cancer risk without ASFs, as estimated by SWAPE, exceeds the SDAPCD threshold
regardless.
An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project’s air emissions with the
health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to
be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. The purpose of the screening-level
construction and operational HRA shown above is to demonstrate the link between the proposed
8
Project’s emissions and the potential health risk. Our screening-level HRA demonstrates that
construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact,
when correct exposure assumptions and up-to-date, applicable guidance are used. Thus, further
environmental review is required in a second tier EIR should be prepared, including a quantified air
pollution model as well as an updated, quantified refined health risk assessment which adequately and
accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation.
Greenhouse Gas Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
As previously stated, the Staff Report claims that no further environmental review is required for the
Project. Specifically, the Staff Report states:
“The Project was adequately covered in previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR 13-01) (Sch No. 2013071077) prepared for the Otay Ranch University Villages Project
Comprehensive Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendment and certified by the City Council
on December 2, 2014. Thus, no further environmental review is required” (p. 1).
As demonstrated above, the Staff Report claims the Project was adequately evaluated in the previously
certified 2013 FEIR, which concluded that the Project would have less-than-significant greenhouse gas
(“GHG”) impacts. However, as previously mentioned, according to CEQA Guidelines § 15152:
“(f) A later EIR shall be required when the initial study or other analysis finds that the later
project may cause significant effects on the environment that were not adequately addressed in
the prior EIR.”
As discussed below, the proposed Project results in potentially significant greenhouse gas (“GHG”)
impact. Thus, the Project results in a potentially significant impact that was not adequately addressed by
the 2013 FEIR.
Specifically, when applying the County of San Diego’s bright-line threshold of 900 MT CO2e/year,
SWAPE’s model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact. 17 The updated CalEEMod output files,
modeled by SWAPE with Project-specific information, disclose the Project’s mitigated emissions, which
include approximately 603 MT CO2e of total constructi on emissions (sum of 2022 and 2023) and
approximately 1,734 MT CO2e/year of net annual operational emissions (sum of area-, energy-, mobile-,
waste-, and water-related emissions). When amortizing the Project’s construction-related GHG
emissions over a period of 30 years and summing them with the Project’s operational GHG emissions,
we estimate net annual GHG emissions of approximately 1,756 MT CO2e/year (see table below).
17 “RECOMMENDED APPROACH TO ADDRESSING CLIMATE CHANGE IN CEQA DOCUMENTS.” County of San Diego
Planning & Development Services, January 2015, available at:
https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/pds/ceqa/Sweetwater-Place/PDS2014-TM-5588-Greenhouse-
Gas-Guidance-2015.pdf, p. 2.
9
SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Phase Proposed Project
(MT CO2e/year)
Total Construction 603.34
Construction (amortized over 30 years) 20.11
Area 0.01
Energy 538.92
Mobile 859.28
Waste 125.47
Water 212.27
Annual Operational 1,735.95
Total Net Annual GHG Emissions 1,756
Bright-line Threshold 900
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated above, the Project’s estimated net annual GHG emissions exceed the threshold of 900
MT CO2e/year, thus resulting in a significant impact not adequately addressed or mitigated. As a result,
further environmental review is required in a second tier EIR in order to adequately address and
mitigate the potential GHG impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions
Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant air quality, health risk,
and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. In an effort to reduce the Project’s emissions, we
identified several mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Project. Feasible mitigation
measures can be found in the Department of Justice Warehouse Project Best Practices document.18
Therefore, to reduce the Project’s emissions, consideration of the following measures should be made:
• Requiring off-road construction equipment to be zero-emission, where available, and all diesel-
fueled off-road construction equipment, to be equipped with CARB Tier IV-compliant engines or
better, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and
contracts, with successful contractors demonstrating the ability to supply the compliant
construction equipment for use prior to any ground-disturbing and construction activities.
• Prohibiting off-road diesel-powered equipment from being in the “on” position for more than 10
hours per day.
• Requiring on-road heavy-duty haul trucks to be model year 2010 or newer if diesel-fueled.
18 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental
Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice.
10
• Providing electrical hook ups to the power grid, rather than use of diesel-fueled generators, for
electric construction tools, such as saws, drills and compressors, and using electric tools
whenever feasible.
• Limiting the amount of daily grading disturbance area.
• Prohibiting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for
particulates or ozone for the project area.
• Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than two minutes.
• Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all
equipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission
control tier classifications.
• Conducting an on-site inspection to verify compliance with construction mitigation and to
identify other opportunities to further reduce construction impacts.
• Using paints, architectural coatings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volatile
organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.
• Providing information on transit and ridesharing programs and services to construction
employees.
• Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations for
construction employees.
• Requiring that all facility-owned and operated fleet equipment with a gross vehicle weight rating
greater than 14,000 pounds accessing the site meet or exceed 2010 model-year emissions
equivalent engine standards as currently defined in California Code of Regulations Title 13,
Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 4.5, Section 2025. Facility operators shall maintain records on-site
demonstrating compliance with this requirement and shall make records available for inspection
by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request.
• Requiring all heavy-duty vehicles entering or operated on the project site to be zero-emission
beginning in 2030.
• Requiring on-site equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be electric with the necessary
electrical charging stations provided.
• Forbidding trucks from idling for more than two minutes and requiring operators to turn off
engines when not in use.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, air
filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the
project.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, an air
monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project,
and making the resulting data publicly available in real time. While air monitoring does not
mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefits the
affected community by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid
exposure to unhealthy air.
• Constructing electric truck charging stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the
project.
11
• Constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door, if the
warehouse use could include refrigeration.
• Constructing electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of parking
spaces at the project.
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation
capacity, such as equal to the building’s projected energy needs.
• Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel.
• Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load
management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks.
• Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages single-
occupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation,
including carpooling, public transit, and biking.
• Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated
parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking.
• Achieving certification of compliance with LEED green building standards.
• Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations.
• Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route.
• Improving and maintaining vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project
area.
• Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel
technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB approved courses. Also
require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make
records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request.
• Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay
program, and requiring tenants to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers.
These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into
the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and
operation. A second tier EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as
include updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation
measures are implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The EIR should also demonstrate a
commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the
Project’s significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible. Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become
available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional
information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of
care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants
practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is
made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing
12
results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was
reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or
otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by
third parties.
Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Attachment A: CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment B: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment C: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment D: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment E: Paul E. Rosenfeld CV
Heritage Industrial Center
San Diego County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Project-specific information provided in the Staff Report.
Land Use - Project-specific information provided in the Staff Report.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Parking Lot 287.00 Space 2.58 114,800.00 0
General Heavy Industry 201.20 1000sqft 4.62 201,200.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
13
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 40
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
2.0 Emissions Summary
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
539.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 1 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
Attachment A
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.2701 2.3951 2.3999 5.3700e-
003
0.3050 0.1094 0.4143 0.1216 0.1024 0.2240 0.0000 480.9974 480.9974 0.0813 0.0173 488.1743
2023 2.4299 0.4715 0.5954 1.2700e-
003
0.0330 0.0209 0.0540 8.9400e-
003
0.0196 0.0286 0.0000 113.5585 113.5585 0.0195 3.7400e-
003
115.1611
Maximum 2.4299 2.3951 2.3999 5.3700e-
003
0.3050 0.1094 0.4143 0.1216 0.1024 0.2240 0.0000 480.9974 480.9974 0.0813 0.0173 488.1743
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.2701 2.3951 2.3999 5.3700e-
003
0.3050 0.1094 0.4143 0.1216 0.1024 0.2240 0.0000 480.9970 480.9970 0.0813 0.0173 488.1740
2023 2.4299 0.4715 0.5954 1.2700e-
003
0.0330 0.0209 0.0540 8.9400e-
003
0.0196 0.0286 0.0000 113.5584 113.5584 0.0195 3.7400e-
003
115.1610
Maximum 2.4299 2.3951 2.3999 5.3700e-
003
0.3050 0.1094 0.4143 0.1216 0.1024 0.2240 0.0000 480.9970 480.9970 0.0813 0.0173 488.1740
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 2 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 2-2-2022 5-1-2022 0.8364 0.8364
2 5-2-2022 8-1-2022 0.6849 0.6849
3 8-2-2022 11-1-2022 0.6868 0.6868
4 11-2-2022 2-1-2023 0.6672 0.6672
5 2-2-2023 5-1-2023 2.6869 2.6869
Highest 2.6869 2.6869
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.0308 4.0000e-
005
4.4800e-
003
0.0000 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 8.7200e-
003
8.7200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.2900e-
003
Energy 0.0125 0.1136 0.0954 6.8000e-
004
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
0.0000 536.6403 536.6403 0.0276 5.3300e-
003
538.9178
Mobile 0.4559 0.5205 4.3118 9.1600e-
003
0.9781 7.1300e-
003
0.9853 0.2611 6.6500e-
003
0.2677 0.0000 846.3436 846.3436 0.0602 0.0384 859.2845
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 50.6442 0.0000 50.6442 2.9930 0.0000 125.4689
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.7610 148.3876 163.1486 1.5252 0.0369 212.2733
Total 1.4992 0.6342 4.4117 9.8400e-
003
0.9781 0.0158 0.9939 0.2611 0.0153 0.2764 65.4053 1,531.380
2
1,596.785
4
4.6060 0.0806 1,735.953
8
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 3 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.0308 4.0000e-
005
4.4800e-
003
0.0000 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 8.7200e-
003
8.7200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.2900e-
003
Energy 0.0125 0.1136 0.0954 6.8000e-
004
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
0.0000 536.6403 536.6403 0.0276 5.3300e-
003
538.9178
Mobile 0.4559 0.5205 4.3118 9.1600e-
003
0.9781 7.1300e-
003
0.9853 0.2611 6.6500e-
003
0.2677 0.0000 846.3436 846.3436 0.0602 0.0384 859.2845
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 50.6442 0.0000 50.6442 2.9930 0.0000 125.4689
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.7610 148.3876 163.1486 1.5252 0.0369 212.2733
Total 1.4992 0.6342 4.4117 9.8400e-
003
0.9781 0.0158 0.9939 0.2611 0.0153 0.2764 65.4053 1,531.380
2
1,596.785
4
4.6060 0.0806 1,735.953
8
Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 2/2/2022 3/1/2022 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/2/2022 3/15/2022 5 10
3 Grading Grading 3/16/2022 4/12/2022 5 20
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 4 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/13/2022 2/28/2023 5 230
5 Paving Paving 3/1/2023 3/28/2023 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/29/2023 4/25/2023 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 301,800; Non-Residential Outdoor: 100,600; Striped Parking Area: 6,888
(Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 2.58
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 5 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e-
004
0.0124 0.0124 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e-
003
0.0000 34.2289
Total 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e-
004
0.0124 0.0124 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e-
003
0.0000 34.2289
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 133.00 52.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 27.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 6 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9829 0.9829 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9922
Total 4.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9829 0.9829 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9922
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e-
004
0.0124 0.0124 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e-
003
0.0000 34.2289
Total 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e-
004
0.0124 0.0124 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e-
003
0.0000 34.2289
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 7 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9829 0.9829 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9922
Total 4.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9829 0.9829 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9922
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004
8.0600e-
003
8.0600e-
003
7.4200e-
003
7.4200e-
003
0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003
0.0000 16.8549
Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004
0.0983 8.0600e-
003
0.1064 0.0505 7.4200e-
003
0.0579 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003
0.0000 16.8549
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 8 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 2.6000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.2000e-
004
0.0000 7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.5897 0.5897 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.5953
Total 2.6000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.2000e-
004
0.0000 7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.5897 0.5897 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.5953
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004
8.0600e-
003
8.0600e-
003
7.4200e-
003
7.4200e-
003
0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003
0.0000 16.8549
Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004
0.0983 8.0600e-
003
0.1064 0.0505 7.4200e-
003
0.0579 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003
0.0000 16.8549
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 9 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 2.6000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.2000e-
004
0.0000 7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.5897 0.5897 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.5953
Total 2.6000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
2.2100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
7.2000e-
004
0.0000 7.3000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.5897 0.5897 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.5953
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0708 0.0000 0.0708 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e-
004
9.4100e-
003
9.4100e-
003
8.6600e-
003
8.6600e-
003
0.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e-
003
0.0000 26.2654
Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e-
004
0.0708 9.4100e-
003
0.0802 0.0343 8.6600e-
003
0.0429 0.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e-
003
0.0000 26.2654
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 10 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9829 0.9829 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9922
Total 4.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9829 0.9829 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9922
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0708 0.0000 0.0708 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e-
004
9.4100e-
003
9.4100e-
003
8.6600e-
003
8.6600e-
003
0.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e-
003
0.0000 26.2654
Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e-
004
0.0708 9.4100e-
003
0.0802 0.0343 8.6600e-
003
0.0429 0.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e-
003
0.0000 26.2654
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 11 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9829 0.9829 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9922
Total 4.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.6800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9829 0.9829 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9922
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1604 1.4679 1.5382 2.5300e-
003
0.0761 0.0761 0.0716 0.0716 0.0000 217.8217 217.8217 0.0522 0.0000 219.1263
Total 0.1604 1.4679 1.5382 2.5300e-
003
0.0761 0.0761 0.0716 0.0716 0.0000 217.8217 217.8217 0.0522 0.0000 219.1263
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 12 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0108 0.2690 0.0881 1.0400e-
003
0.0325 2.8300e-
003
0.0353 9.3700e-
003
2.7100e-
003
0.0121 0.0000 101.9341 101.9341 3.0900e-
003
0.0148 106.4239
Worker 0.0361 0.0262 0.3069 8.9000e-
004
0.1003 5.8000e-
004
0.1008 0.0266 5.3000e-
004
0.0272 0.0000 81.9213 81.9213 2.5900e-
003
2.3800e-
003
82.6952
Total 0.0469 0.2952 0.3950 1.9300e-
003
0.1327 3.4100e-
003
0.1361 0.0360 3.2400e-
003
0.0393 0.0000 183.8554 183.8554 5.6800e-
003
0.0172 189.1191
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1604 1.4679 1.5382 2.5300e-
003
0.0761 0.0761 0.0716 0.0716 0.0000 217.8215 217.8215 0.0522 0.0000 219.1261
Total 0.1604 1.4679 1.5382 2.5300e-
003
0.0761 0.0761 0.0716 0.0716 0.0000 217.8215 217.8215 0.0522 0.0000 219.1261
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 13 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0108 0.2690 0.0881 1.0400e-
003
0.0325 2.8300e-
003
0.0353 9.3700e-
003
2.7100e-
003
0.0121 0.0000 101.9341 101.9341 3.0900e-
003
0.0148 106.4239
Worker 0.0361 0.0262 0.3069 8.9000e-
004
0.1003 5.8000e-
004
0.1008 0.0266 5.3000e-
004
0.0272 0.0000 81.9213 81.9213 2.5900e-
003
2.3800e-
003
82.6952
Total 0.0469 0.2952 0.3950 1.9300e-
003
0.1327 3.4100e-
003
0.1361 0.0360 3.2400e-
003
0.0393 0.0000 183.8554 183.8554 5.6800e-
003
0.0172 189.1191
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0330 0.3021 0.3411 5.7000e-
004
0.0147 0.0147 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 48.6790 48.6790 0.0116 0.0000 48.9685
Total 0.0330 0.3021 0.3411 5.7000e-
004
0.0147 0.0147 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 48.6790 48.6790 0.0116 0.0000 48.9685
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 14 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.2800e-
003
0.0485 0.0171 2.2000e-
004
7.2500e-
003
2.9000e-
004
7.5400e-
003
2.0900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
2.3700e-
003
0.0000 21.9110 21.9110 6.6000e-
004
3.1700e-
003
22.8737
Worker 7.5500e-
003
5.2300e-
003
0.0637 1.9000e-
004
0.0224 1.2000e-
004
0.0225 5.9500e-
003
1.1000e-
004
6.0600e-
003
0.0000 17.7232 17.7232 5.3000e-
004
4.9000e-
004
17.8837
Total 8.8300e-
003
0.0537 0.0808 4.1000e-
004
0.0297 4.1000e-
004
0.0301 8.0400e-
003
3.8000e-
004
8.4300e-
003
0.0000 39.6343 39.6343 1.1900e-
003
3.6600e-
003
40.7574
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0330 0.3021 0.3411 5.7000e-
004
0.0147 0.0147 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 48.6789 48.6789 0.0116 0.0000 48.9684
Total 0.0330 0.3021 0.3411 5.7000e-
004
0.0147 0.0147 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 48.6789 48.6789 0.0116 0.0000 48.9684
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 15 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.2800e-
003
0.0485 0.0171 2.2000e-
004
7.2500e-
003
2.9000e-
004
7.5400e-
003
2.0900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
2.3700e-
003
0.0000 21.9110 21.9110 6.6000e-
004
3.1700e-
003
22.8737
Worker 7.5500e-
003
5.2300e-
003
0.0637 1.9000e-
004
0.0224 1.2000e-
004
0.0225 5.9500e-
003
1.1000e-
004
6.0600e-
003
0.0000 17.7232 17.7232 5.3000e-
004
4.9000e-
004
17.8837
Total 8.8300e-
003
0.0537 0.0808 4.1000e-
004
0.0297 4.1000e-
004
0.0301 8.0400e-
003
3.8000e-
004
8.4300e-
003
0.0000 39.6343 39.6343 1.1900e-
003
3.6600e-
003
40.7574
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
003
5.1000e-
003
4.6900e-
003
4.6900e-
003
0.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e-
003
0.0000 20.1888
Paving 3.3800e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0137 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
003
5.1000e-
003
4.6900e-
003
4.6900e-
003
0.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e-
003
0.0000 20.1888
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 16 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.1000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
3.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9518 0.9518 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9605
Total 4.1000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
3.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9518 0.9518 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9605
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
003
5.1000e-
003
4.6900e-
003
4.6900e-
003
0.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e-
003
0.0000 20.1888
Paving 3.3800e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0137 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
003
5.1000e-
003
4.6900e-
003
4.6900e-
003
0.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e-
003
0.0000 20.1888
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 17 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.1000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
3.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9518 0.9518 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9605
Total 4.1000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
3.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2100e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
0.0000 0.9518 0.9518 3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.9605
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 2.3713 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.9200e-
003
0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e-
004
0.0000 2.5571
Total 2.3732 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e-
004
0.0000 2.5571
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 18 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 7.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
004
6.1500e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.1700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
2.1800e-
003
5.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
5.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.7133 1.7133 5.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
1.7288
Total 7.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
004
6.1500e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.1700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
2.1800e-
003
5.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
5.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.7133 1.7133 5.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
1.7288
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 2.3713 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.9200e-
003
0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e-
004
0.0000 2.5571
Total 2.3732 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
7.1000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e-
004
0.0000 2.5571
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 19 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 7.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
004
6.1500e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.1700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
2.1800e-
003
5.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
5.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.7133 1.7133 5.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
1.7288
Total 7.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
004
6.1500e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.1700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
2.1800e-
003
5.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
5.9000e-
004
0.0000 1.7133 1.7133 5.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
1.7288
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 20 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.4559 0.5205 4.3118 9.1600e-
003
0.9781 7.1300e-
003
0.9853 0.2611 6.6500e-
003
0.2677 0.0000 846.3436 846.3436 0.0602 0.0384 859.2845
Unmitigated 0.4559 0.5205 4.3118 9.1600e-
003
0.9781 7.1300e-
003
0.9853 0.2611 6.6500e-
003
0.2677 0.0000 846.3436 846.3436 0.0602 0.0384 859.2845
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Heavy Industry 790.72 1,291.70 1024.11 2,614,794 2,614,794
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 790.72 1,291.70 1,024.11 2,614,794 2,614,794
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
General Heavy Industry 9.50 7.30 7.30 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
General Heavy Industry 0.557888 0.062607 0.178921 0.119061 0.024112 0.006269 0.008734 0.006266 0.000708 0.000566 0.028949 0.000971 0.004949
Parking Lot 0.557888 0.062607 0.178921 0.119061 0.024112 0.006269 0.008734 0.006266 0.000708 0.000566 0.028949 0.000971 0.004949
5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 21 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 412.9524 412.9524 0.0252 3.0600e-
003
414.4949
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 412.9524 412.9524 0.0252 3.0600e-
003
414.4949
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0125 0.1136 0.0954 6.8000e-
004
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
0.0000 123.6879 123.6879 2.3700e-
003
2.2700e-
003
124.4229
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0125 0.1136 0.0954 6.8000e-
004
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
0.0000 123.6879 123.6879 2.3700e-
003
2.2700e-
003
124.4229
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 22 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
2.31782e
+006
0.0125 0.1136 0.0954 6.8000e-
004
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
0.0000 123.6879 123.6879 2.3700e-
003
2.2700e-
003
124.4229
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0125 0.1136 0.0954 6.8000e-
004
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
0.0000 123.6879 123.6879 2.3700e-
003
2.2700e-
003
124.4229
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
2.31782e
+006
0.0125 0.1136 0.0954 6.8000e-
004
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
0.0000 123.6879 123.6879 2.3700e-
003
2.2700e-
003
124.4229
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0125 0.1136 0.0954 6.8000e-
004
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
8.6400e-
003
0.0000 123.6879 123.6879 2.3700e-
003
2.2700e-
003
124.4229
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 23 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
1.64582e
+006
403.1110 0.0246 2.9900e-
003
404.6168
Parking Lot 40180 9.8413 6.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
005
9.8781
Total 412.9524 0.0252 3.0600e-
003
414.4949
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
1.64582e
+006
403.1110 0.0246 2.9900e-
003
404.6168
Parking Lot 40180 9.8413 6.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
005
9.8781
Total 412.9524 0.0252 3.0600e-
003
414.4949
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 24 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.0308 4.0000e-
005
4.4800e-
003
0.0000 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 8.7200e-
003
8.7200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.2900e-
003
Unmitigated 1.0308 4.0000e-
005
4.4800e-
003
0.0000 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 8.7200e-
003
8.7200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.2900e-
003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.2371 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.7932 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.1000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.4800e-
003
0.0000 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 8.7200e-
003
8.7200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.2900e-
003
Total 1.0308 4.0000e-
005
4.4800e-
003
0.0000 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 8.7200e-
003
8.7200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.2900e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 25 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.2371 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.7932 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.1000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.4800e-
003
0.0000 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 8.7200e-
003
8.7200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.2900e-
003
Total 1.0308 4.0000e-
005
4.4800e-
003
0.0000 2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 8.7200e-
003
8.7200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.2900e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 26 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 163.1486 1.5252 0.0369 212.2733
Unmitigated 163.1486 1.5252 0.0369 212.2733
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
46.5275 /
0
163.1486 1.5252 0.0369 212.2733
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 163.1486 1.5252 0.0369 212.2733
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 27 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
46.5275 /
0
163.1486 1.5252 0.0369 212.2733
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 163.1486 1.5252 0.0369 212.2733
Mitigated
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 50.6442 2.9930 0.0000 125.4689
Unmitigated 50.6442 2.9930 0.0000 125.4689
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 28 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
249.49 50.6442 2.9930 0.0000 125.4689
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 50.6442 2.9930 0.0000 125.4689
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Heavy
Industry
249.49 50.6442 2.9930 0.0000 125.4689
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 50.6442 2.9930 0.0000 125.4689
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 29 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:59 AMPage 30 of 30
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
Heritage Industrial Center
San Diego County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Project-specific information provided in the Staff Report.
Land Use - Project-specific information provided in the Staff Report.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Parking Lot 287.00 Space 2.58 114,800.00 0
General Heavy Industry 201.20 1000sqft 4.62 201,200.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
13
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 40
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
2.0 Emissions Summary
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
539.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 1 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2227 33.1177 20.9825 0.0480 19.8049 1.6134 21.4183 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,757.178
3
4,757.178
3
1.1961 0.1996 4,833.599
2
2023 237.3967 16.8397 20.2392 0.0472 1.4447 0.7192 2.1639 0.3912 0.6768 1.0680 0.0000 4,680.427
3
4,680.427
3
0.7170 0.1908 4,754.000
5
Maximum 237.3967 33.1177 20.9825 0.0480 19.8049 1.6134 21.4183 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,757.178
3
4,757.178
3
1.1961 0.1996 4,833.599
2
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2227 33.1177 20.9825 0.0480 19.8049 1.6134 21.4183 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,757.178
3
4,757.178
3
1.1961 0.1996 4,833.599
2
2023 237.3967 16.8397 20.2392 0.0472 1.4447 0.7192 2.1639 0.3912 0.6768 1.0680 0.0000 4,680.427
3
4,680.427
3
0.7170 0.1908 4,754.000
5
Maximum 237.3967 33.1177 20.9825 0.0480 19.8049 1.6134 21.4183 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,757.178
3
4,757.178
3
1.1961 0.1996 4,833.599
2
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 2 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 3 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Energy 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Mobile 3.7624 3.8492 34.0385 0.0754 7.9387 0.0566 7.9952 2.1147 0.0528 2.1675 7,685.313
9
7,685.313
9
0.5070 0.3215 7,793.785
9
Total 9.4812 4.4722 34.6112 0.0792 7.9387 0.1041 8.0427 2.1147 0.1003 2.2150 8,432.503
4
8,432.503
4
0.5216 0.3352 8,545.422
0
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Energy 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Mobile 3.7624 3.8492 34.0385 0.0754 7.9387 0.0566 7.9952 2.1147 0.0528 2.1675 7,685.313
9
7,685.313
9
0.5070 0.3215 7,793.785
9
Total 9.4812 4.4722 34.6112 0.0792 7.9387 0.1041 8.0427 2.1147 0.1003 2.2150 8,432.503
4
8,432.503
4
0.5216 0.3352 8,545.422
0
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 4 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 2/2/2022 3/1/2022 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/2/2022 3/15/2022 5 10
3 Grading Grading 3/16/2022 4/12/2022 5 20
4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/13/2022 2/28/2023 5 230
5 Paving Paving 3/1/2023 3/28/2023 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/29/2023 4/25/2023 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 301,800; Non-Residential Outdoor: 100,600; Striped Parking Area: 6,888
(Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 2.58
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 5 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 133.00 52.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 27.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 6 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781
2
3,746.781
2
1.0524 3,773.092
0
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781
2
3,746.781
2
1.0524 3,773.092
0
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0438 0.0285 0.3884 1.1200e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 113.6562 113.6562 3.2800e-
003
2.9500e-
003
114.6171
Total 0.0438 0.0285 0.3884 1.1200e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 113.6562 113.6562 3.2800e-
003
2.9500e-
003
114.6171
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 7 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781
2
3,746.781
2
1.0524 3,773.092
0
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781
2
3,746.781
2
1.0524 3,773.092
0
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0438 0.0285 0.3884 1.1200e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 113.6562 113.6562 3.2800e-
003
2.9500e-
003
114.6171
Total 0.0438 0.0285 0.3884 1.1200e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 113.6562 113.6562 3.2800e-
003
2.9500e-
003
114.6171
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 8 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061
9
3,686.061
9
1.1922 3,715.865
5
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061
9
3,686.061
9
1.1922 3,715.865
5
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0525 0.0342 0.4661 1.3500e-
003
0.1479 8.4000e-
004
0.1487 0.0392 7.7000e-
004
0.0400 136.3874 136.3874 3.9400e-
003
3.5400e-
003
137.5405
Total 0.0525 0.0342 0.4661 1.3500e-
003
0.1479 8.4000e-
004
0.1487 0.0392 7.7000e-
004
0.0400 136.3874 136.3874 3.9400e-
003
3.5400e-
003
137.5405
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 9 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061
9
3,686.061
9
1.1922 3,715.865
5
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 0.0000 3,686.061
9
3,686.061
9
1.1922 3,715.865
5
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0525 0.0342 0.4661 1.3500e-
003
0.1479 8.4000e-
004
0.1487 0.0392 7.7000e-
004
0.0400 136.3874 136.3874 3.9400e-
003
3.5400e-
003
137.5405
Total 0.0525 0.0342 0.4661 1.3500e-
003
0.1479 8.4000e-
004
0.1487 0.0392 7.7000e-
004
0.0400 136.3874 136.3874 3.9400e-
003
3.5400e-
003
137.5405
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 10 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.046
4
2,872.046
4
0.9289 2,895.268
4
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.046
4
2,872.046
4
0.9289 2,895.268
4
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0438 0.0285 0.3884 1.1200e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 113.6562 113.6562 3.2800e-
003
2.9500e-
003
114.6171
Total 0.0438 0.0285 0.3884 1.1200e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 113.6562 113.6562 3.2800e-
003
2.9500e-
003
114.6171
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 11 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.046
4
2,872.046
4
0.9289 2,895.268
4
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 0.0000 2,872.046
4
2,872.046
4
0.9289 2,895.268
4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0438 0.0285 0.3884 1.1200e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 113.6562 113.6562 3.2800e-
003
2.9500e-
003
114.6171
Total 0.0438 0.0285 0.3884 1.1200e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 113.6562 113.6562 3.2800e-
003
2.9500e-
003
114.6171
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 12 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333
6
2,554.333
6
0.6120 2,569.632
2
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333
6
2,554.333
6
0.6120 2,569.632
2
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1159 2.7654 0.9251 0.0111 0.3522 0.0301 0.3822 0.1014 0.0288 0.1301 1,195.093
3
1,195.093
3
0.0363 0.1735 1,247.695
4
Worker 0.3882 0.2527 3.4438 9.9700e-
003
1.0926 6.1800e-
003
1.0987 0.2898 5.6900e-
003
0.2955 1,007.751
5
1,007.751
5
0.0291 0.0262 1,016.271
6
Total 0.5040 3.0181 4.3689 0.0211 1.4447 0.0362 1.4810 0.3912 0.0345 0.4256 2,202.844
7
2,202.844
7
0.0655 0.1996 2,263.967
0
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 13 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333
6
2,554.333
6
0.6120 2,569.632
2
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333
6
2,554.333
6
0.6120 2,569.632
2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1159 2.7654 0.9251 0.0111 0.3522 0.0301 0.3822 0.1014 0.0288 0.1301 1,195.093
3
1,195.093
3
0.0363 0.1735 1,247.695
4
Worker 0.3882 0.2527 3.4438 9.9700e-
003
1.0926 6.1800e-
003
1.0987 0.2898 5.6900e-
003
0.2955 1,007.751
5
1,007.751
5
0.0291 0.0262 1,016.271
6
Total 0.5040 3.0181 4.3689 0.0211 1.4447 0.0362 1.4810 0.3912 0.0345 0.4256 2,202.844
7
2,202.844
7
0.0655 0.1996 2,263.967
0
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 14 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0621 2.2291 0.8033 0.0107 0.3522 0.0136 0.3658 0.1014 0.0130 0.1144 1,149.444
2
1,149.444
2
0.0348 0.1664 1,199.911
4
Worker 0.3635 0.2257 3.1919 9.6500e-
003
1.0926 5.8600e-
003
1.0984 0.2898 5.3900e-
003
0.2952 975.7732 975.7732 0.0265 0.0243 983.6830
Total 0.4256 2.4548 3.9952 0.0203 1.4447 0.0194 1.4642 0.3912 0.0184 0.4096 2,125.217
3
2,125.217
3
0.0613 0.1908 2,183.594
4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 15 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0621 2.2291 0.8033 0.0107 0.3522 0.0136 0.3658 0.1014 0.0130 0.1144 1,149.444
2
1,149.444
2
0.0348 0.1664 1,199.911
4
Worker 0.3635 0.2257 3.1919 9.6500e-
003
1.0926 5.8600e-
003
1.0984 0.2898 5.3900e-
003
0.2952 975.7732 975.7732 0.0265 0.0243 983.6830
Total 0.4256 2.4548 3.9952 0.0203 1.4447 0.0194 1.4642 0.3912 0.0184 0.4096 2,125.217
3
2,125.217
3
0.0613 0.1908 2,183.594
4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 16 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584
1
2,207.584
1
0.7140 2,225.433
6
Paving 0.3380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.3707 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584
1
2,207.584
1
0.7140 2,225.433
6
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0410 0.0255 0.3600 1.0900e-
003
0.1232 6.6000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 110.0496 110.0496 2.9800e-
003
2.7400e-
003
110.9417
Total 0.0410 0.0255 0.3600 1.0900e-
003
0.1232 6.6000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 110.0496 110.0496 2.9800e-
003
2.7400e-
003
110.9417
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 17 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584
1
2,207.584
1
0.7140 2,225.433
6
Paving 0.3380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.3707 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584
1
2,207.584
1
0.7140 2,225.433
6
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0410 0.0255 0.3600 1.0900e-
003
0.1232 6.6000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 110.0496 110.0496 2.9800e-
003
2.7400e-
003
110.9417
Total 0.0410 0.0255 0.3600 1.0900e-
003
0.1232 6.6000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 110.0496 110.0496 2.9800e-
003
2.7400e-
003
110.9417
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 18 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 237.1312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003
0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690
Total 237.3229 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003
0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0738 0.0458 0.6480 1.9600e-
003
0.2218 1.1900e-
003
0.2230 0.0588 1.0900e-
003
0.0599 198.0893 198.0893 5.3700e-
003
4.9400e-
003
199.6950
Total 0.0738 0.0458 0.6480 1.9600e-
003
0.2218 1.1900e-
003
0.2230 0.0588 1.0900e-
003
0.0599 198.0893 198.0893 5.3700e-
003
4.9400e-
003
199.6950
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 19 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 237.1312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003
0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690
Total 237.3229 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003
0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0738 0.0458 0.6480 1.9600e-
003
0.2218 1.1900e-
003
0.2230 0.0588 1.0900e-
003
0.0599 198.0893 198.0893 5.3700e-
003
4.9400e-
003
199.6950
Total 0.0738 0.0458 0.6480 1.9600e-
003
0.2218 1.1900e-
003
0.2230 0.0588 1.0900e-
003
0.0599 198.0893 198.0893 5.3700e-
003
4.9400e-
003
199.6950
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 20 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.7624 3.8492 34.0385 0.0754 7.9387 0.0566 7.9952 2.1147 0.0528 2.1675 7,685.313
9
7,685.313
9
0.5070 0.3215 7,793.785
9
Unmitigated 3.7624 3.8492 34.0385 0.0754 7.9387 0.0566 7.9952 2.1147 0.0528 2.1675 7,685.313
9
7,685.313
9
0.5070 0.3215 7,793.785
9
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Heavy Industry 790.72 1,291.70 1024.11 2,614,794 2,614,794
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 790.72 1,291.70 1,024.11 2,614,794 2,614,794
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
General Heavy Industry 9.50 7.30 7.30 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 21 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
General Heavy Industry 0.557888 0.062607 0.178921 0.119061 0.024112 0.006269 0.008734 0.006266 0.000708 0.000566 0.028949 0.000971 0.004949
Parking Lot 0.557888 0.062607 0.178921 0.119061 0.024112 0.006269 0.008734 0.006266 0.000708 0.000566 0.028949 0.000971 0.004949
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 22 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Heavy
Industry
6350.2 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Heavy
Industry
6.3502 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 23 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Unmitigated 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
1.2994 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3463 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.5900e-
003
4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Total 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 24 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
1.2994 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3463 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.5900e-
003
4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Total 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 25 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
11.0 Vegetation
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:57 AMPage 26 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
Heritage Industrial Center
San Diego County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Project-specific information provided in the Staff Report.
Land Use - Project-specific information provided in the Staff Report.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Parking Lot 287.00 Space 2.58 114,800.00 0
General Heavy Industry 201.20 1000sqft 4.62 201,200.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
13
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 40
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
2.0 Emissions Summary
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
539.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 1 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2270 33.1220 20.9623 0.0475 19.8049 1.6134 21.4183 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,702.249
0
4,702.249
0
1.1963 0.2020 4,779.422
0
2023 237.4029 16.9616 20.1046 0.0467 1.4447 0.7192 2.1640 0.3912 0.6769 1.0681 0.0000 4,628.429
0
4,628.429
0
0.7172 0.1931 4,702.748
0
Maximum 237.4029 33.1220 20.9623 0.0475 19.8049 1.6134 21.4183 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,702.249
0
4,702.249
0
1.1963 0.2020 4,779.422
0
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2270 33.1220 20.9623 0.0475 19.8049 1.6134 21.4183 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,702.249
0
4,702.249
0
1.1963 0.2020 4,779.422
0
2023 237.4029 16.9616 20.1046 0.0467 1.4447 0.7192 2.1640 0.3912 0.6769 1.0681 0.0000 4,628.429
0
4,628.429
0
0.7172 0.1931 4,702.748
0
Maximum 237.4029 33.1220 20.9623 0.0475 19.8049 1.6134 21.4183 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,702.249
0
4,702.249
0
1.1963 0.2020 4,779.422
0
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 2 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 3 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Energy 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Mobile 3.6813 4.1710 34.8478 0.0721 7.9387 0.0566 7.9953 2.1147 0.0528 2.1675 7,351.712
0
7,351.712
0
0.5356 0.3386 7,466.013
3
Total 9.4000 4.7940 35.4205 0.0759 7.9387 0.1041 8.0428 2.1147 0.1003 2.2150 8,098.901
6
8,098.901
6
0.5502 0.3523 8,217.649
3
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Energy 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Mobile 3.6813 4.1710 34.8478 0.0721 7.9387 0.0566 7.9953 2.1147 0.0528 2.1675 7,351.712
0
7,351.712
0
0.5356 0.3386 7,466.013
3
Total 9.4000 4.7940 35.4205 0.0759 7.9387 0.1041 8.0428 2.1147 0.1003 2.2150 8,098.901
6
8,098.901
6
0.5502 0.3523 8,217.649
3
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 4 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 2/2/2022 3/1/2022 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/2/2022 3/15/2022 5 10
3 Grading Grading 3/16/2022 4/12/2022 5 20
4 Building Construction Building Construction 4/13/2022 2/28/2023 5 230
5 Paving Paving 3/1/2023 3/28/2023 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/29/2023 4/25/2023 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 301,800; Non-Residential Outdoor: 100,600; Striped Parking Area: 6,888
(Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 2.58
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 5 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 133.00 52.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 27.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 6 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781
2
3,746.781
2
1.0524 3,773.092
0
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781
2
3,746.781
2
1.0524 3,773.092
0
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0474 0.0321 0.3682 1.0600e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 107.3920 107.3920 3.4900e-
003
3.1900e-
003
108.4299
Total 0.0474 0.0321 0.3682 1.0600e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 107.3920 107.3920 3.4900e-
003
3.1900e-
003
108.4299
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 7 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781
2
3,746.781
2
1.0524 3,773.092
0
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781
2
3,746.781
2
1.0524 3,773.092
0
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0474 0.0321 0.3682 1.0600e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 107.3920 107.3920 3.4900e-
003
3.1900e-
003
108.4299
Total 0.0474 0.0321 0.3682 1.0600e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 107.3920 107.3920 3.4900e-
003
3.1900e-
003
108.4299
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 8 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061
9
3,686.061
9
1.1922 3,715.865
5
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061
9
3,686.061
9
1.1922 3,715.865
5
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0568 0.0385 0.4419 1.2700e-
003
0.1479 8.4000e-
004
0.1487 0.0392 7.7000e-
004
0.0400 128.8704 128.8704 4.1900e-
003
3.8300e-
003
130.1159
Total 0.0568 0.0385 0.4419 1.2700e-
003
0.1479 8.4000e-
004
0.1487 0.0392 7.7000e-
004
0.0400 128.8704 128.8704 4.1900e-
003
3.8300e-
003
130.1159
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 9 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061
9
3,686.061
9
1.1922 3,715.865
5
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 0.0000 3,686.061
9
3,686.061
9
1.1922 3,715.865
5
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0568 0.0385 0.4419 1.2700e-
003
0.1479 8.4000e-
004
0.1487 0.0392 7.7000e-
004
0.0400 128.8704 128.8704 4.1900e-
003
3.8300e-
003
130.1159
Total 0.0568 0.0385 0.4419 1.2700e-
003
0.1479 8.4000e-
004
0.1487 0.0392 7.7000e-
004
0.0400 128.8704 128.8704 4.1900e-
003
3.8300e-
003
130.1159
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 10 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.046
4
2,872.046
4
0.9289 2,895.268
4
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.046
4
2,872.046
4
0.9289 2,895.268
4
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0474 0.0321 0.3682 1.0600e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 107.3920 107.3920 3.4900e-
003
3.1900e-
003
108.4299
Total 0.0474 0.0321 0.3682 1.0600e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 107.3920 107.3920 3.4900e-
003
3.1900e-
003
108.4299
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 11 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.046
4
2,872.046
4
0.9289 2,895.268
4
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 0.0000 2,872.046
4
2,872.046
4
0.9289 2,895.268
4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0474 0.0321 0.3682 1.0600e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 107.3920 107.3920 3.4900e-
003
3.1900e-
003
108.4299
Total 0.0474 0.0321 0.3682 1.0600e-
003
0.1232 7.0000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.4000e-
004
0.0333 107.3920 107.3920 3.4900e-
003
3.1900e-
003
108.4299
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 12 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333
6
2,554.333
6
0.6120 2,569.632
2
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333
6
2,554.333
6
0.6120 2,569.632
2
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1148 2.8697 0.9537 0.0111 0.3522 0.0302 0.3823 0.1014 0.0289 0.1302 1,195.706
7
1,195.706
7
0.0362 0.1737 1,248.378
1
Worker 0.4198 0.2842 3.2651 9.4200e-
003
1.0926 6.1800e-
003
1.0987 0.2898 5.6900e-
003
0.2955 952.2087 952.2087 0.0310 0.0283 961.4117
Total 0.5346 3.1539 4.2187 0.0205 1.4447 0.0363 1.4811 0.3912 0.0345 0.4257 2,147.915
4
2,147.915
4
0.0671 0.2020 2,209.789
8
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 13 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333
6
2,554.333
6
0.6120 2,569.632
2
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333
6
2,554.333
6
0.6120 2,569.632
2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1148 2.8697 0.9537 0.0111 0.3522 0.0302 0.3823 0.1014 0.0289 0.1302 1,195.706
7
1,195.706
7
0.0362 0.1737 1,248.378
1
Worker 0.4198 0.2842 3.2651 9.4200e-
003
1.0926 6.1800e-
003
1.0987 0.2898 5.6900e-
003
0.2955 952.2087 952.2087 0.0310 0.0283 961.4117
Total 0.5346 3.1539 4.2187 0.0205 1.4447 0.0363 1.4811 0.3912 0.0345 0.4257 2,147.915
4
2,147.915
4
0.0671 0.2020 2,209.789
8
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 14 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0604 2.3229 0.8276 0.0107 0.3522 0.0137 0.3658 0.1014 0.0131 0.1144 1,151.078
3
1,151.078
3
0.0347 0.1668 1,201.657
4
Worker 0.3941 0.2538 3.0330 9.1200e-
003
1.0926 5.8600e-
003
1.0984 0.2898 5.3900e-
003
0.2952 922.1408 922.1408 0.0282 0.0263 930.6846
Total 0.4545 2.5767 3.8606 0.0198 1.4447 0.0195 1.4642 0.3912 0.0184 0.4096 2,073.219
1
2,073.219
1
0.0628 0.1931 2,132.342
0
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 15 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209
9
2,555.209
9
0.6079 2,570.406
1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0604 2.3229 0.8276 0.0107 0.3522 0.0137 0.3658 0.1014 0.0131 0.1144 1,151.078
3
1,151.078
3
0.0347 0.1668 1,201.657
4
Worker 0.3941 0.2538 3.0330 9.1200e-
003
1.0926 5.8600e-
003
1.0984 0.2898 5.3900e-
003
0.2952 922.1408 922.1408 0.0282 0.0263 930.6846
Total 0.4545 2.5767 3.8606 0.0198 1.4447 0.0195 1.4642 0.3912 0.0184 0.4096 2,073.219
1
2,073.219
1
0.0628 0.1931 2,132.342
0
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 16 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584
1
2,207.584
1
0.7140 2,225.433
6
Paving 0.3380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.3707 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584
1
2,207.584
1
0.7140 2,225.433
6
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0445 0.0286 0.3421 1.0300e-
003
0.1232 6.6000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 104.0008 104.0008 3.1800e-
003
2.9700e-
003
104.9644
Total 0.0445 0.0286 0.3421 1.0300e-
003
0.1232 6.6000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 104.0008 104.0008 3.1800e-
003
2.9700e-
003
104.9644
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 17 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584
1
2,207.584
1
0.7140 2,225.433
6
Paving 0.3380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.3707 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584
1
2,207.584
1
0.7140 2,225.433
6
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0445 0.0286 0.3421 1.0300e-
003
0.1232 6.6000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 104.0008 104.0008 3.1800e-
003
2.9700e-
003
104.9644
Total 0.0445 0.0286 0.3421 1.0300e-
003
0.1232 6.6000e-
004
0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004
0.0333 104.0008 104.0008 3.1800e-
003
2.9700e-
003
104.9644
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 18 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 237.1312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003
0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690
Total 237.3229 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003
0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0800 0.0515 0.6157 1.8500e-
003
0.2218 1.1900e-
003
0.2230 0.0588 1.0900e-
003
0.0599 187.2015 187.2015 5.7200e-
003
5.3400e-
003
188.9360
Total 0.0800 0.0515 0.6157 1.8500e-
003
0.2218 1.1900e-
003
0.2230 0.0588 1.0900e-
003
0.0599 187.2015 187.2015 5.7200e-
003
5.3400e-
003
188.9360
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 19 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 237.1312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003
0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690
Total 237.3229 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-
003
0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0800 0.0515 0.6157 1.8500e-
003
0.2218 1.1900e-
003
0.2230 0.0588 1.0900e-
003
0.0599 187.2015 187.2015 5.7200e-
003
5.3400e-
003
188.9360
Total 0.0800 0.0515 0.6157 1.8500e-
003
0.2218 1.1900e-
003
0.2230 0.0588 1.0900e-
003
0.0599 187.2015 187.2015 5.7200e-
003
5.3400e-
003
188.9360
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 20 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.6813 4.1710 34.8478 0.0721 7.9387 0.0566 7.9953 2.1147 0.0528 2.1675 7,351.712
0
7,351.712
0
0.5356 0.3386 7,466.013
3
Unmitigated 3.6813 4.1710 34.8478 0.0721 7.9387 0.0566 7.9953 2.1147 0.0528 2.1675 7,351.712
0
7,351.712
0
0.5356 0.3386 7,466.013
3
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Heavy Industry 790.72 1,291.70 1024.11 2,614,794 2,614,794
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 790.72 1,291.70 1,024.11 2,614,794 2,614,794
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
General Heavy Industry 9.50 7.30 7.30 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 21 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
General Heavy Industry 0.557888 0.062607 0.178921 0.119061 0.024112 0.006269 0.008734 0.006266 0.000708 0.000566 0.028949 0.000971 0.004949
Parking Lot 0.557888 0.062607 0.178921 0.119061 0.024112 0.006269 0.008734 0.006266 0.000708 0.000566 0.028949 0.000971 0.004949
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 22 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Heavy
Industry
6350.2 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Heavy
Industry
6.3502 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0685 0.6226 0.5230 3.7400e-
003
0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 0.0473 747.0827 747.0827 0.0143 0.0137 751.5222
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 23 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Unmitigated 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
1.2994 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3463 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.5900e-
003
4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Total 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 24 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
1.2994 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.3463 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.5900e-
003
4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Total 5.6503 4.5000e-
004
0.0498 0.0000 1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.1068 0.1068 2.8000e-
004
0.1138
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 25 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
11.0 Vegetation
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 2/2/2022 10:55 AMPage 26 of 26
Heritage Industrial Center - San Diego County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
Annual Emissions (tons/year)0.1094 Total DPM (lbs)212.6728767 Annual Emissions (tons/year)0.0158
Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.59945205 Total DPM (g)96468.41688 Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.086575342
Construction Duration (days)333 Emission Rate (g/s)0.002497836 Total DPM (lbs)31.6
Total DPM (lbs)199.617534 Release Height (meters)3 Emission Rate (g/s)0.000454521
Total DPM (g)90546.5135 Total Acreage 11.6 Release Height (meters)3
Start Date 2/2/2022 Max Horizontal (meters)306.41 Total Acreage 11.6
End Date 1/1/2023 Min Horizontal (meters)153.21 Max Horizontal (meters)306.41
Construction Days 333 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters)1.5 Min Horizontal (meters)153.21
Setting Urban Initial Vertical Dimension (meters)1.5
Annual Emissions (tons/year)0.0209 Population 275,487 Setting Urban
Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.11452055 Start Date 2/2/2022 Population 275,487
Construction Duration (days)114 End Date 4/25/2023
Total DPM (lbs)13.0553425 Total Construction Days 447
Total DPM (g)5921.90334 Total Years of Construction 1.22
Start Date 1/1/2023 Total Years of Operation 28.78
End Date 4/25/2023
Construction Days 114
2023
Construction Operation
2022 Total Emission Rate
Attachment B
Start date and time 02/02/22 12:02:19
AERSCREEN 21112
Heritage Industrial Center, Construction
Heritage Industrial Center, Construction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
METRIC ENGLISH
** AREADATA ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Emission Rate: 0.250E‐02 g/s 0.198E‐01 lb/hr
Area Height:3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length: 306.31 meters 1004.95 feet
Area Source Width: 153.21 meters 502.66 feet
Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode:URBAN
Population:275487
Dist to Ambient Air:1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
Attachment C
No Building Downwash Parameters
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet
Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
** FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA **
Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K ‐9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s
Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted
DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2022.02.02_Aerscreen_HeritageIndustrialCenter_Construction.out
*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics...
Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture
Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000
Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl
Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe
FLOWSECTOR started 02/02/22 12:05:55
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
FLOWSECTOR ended 02/02/22 12:06:14
REFINE started 02/02/22 12:06:14
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
REFINE ended 02/02/22 12:06:16
**********************************************
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
***********************************************
Ending date and time 02/02/22 12:06:18
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M‐O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT
REF TA HT
0.16356E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17373E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18295E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19105E+01 75.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19824E+01 100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20487E+01 125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21077E+01 150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
* 0.21211E+01 156.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19067E+01 175.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13829E+01 200.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11366E+01 225.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.99047E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.88083E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.79099E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.71543E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.65165E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.59684E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54948E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50857E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47228E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44045E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41183E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38657E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36389E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34319E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32456E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30769E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29210E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27793E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26499E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25307E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24190E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23153E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22195E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21307E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20482E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19714E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18993E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18310E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17670E+00 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17065E+00 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16495E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15959E+00 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15453E+00 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14975E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14524E+00 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14096E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13686E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13295E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12924E+00 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12571E+00 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12235E+00 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11914E+00 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11609E+00 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11317E+00 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11037E+00 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10767E+00 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10509E+00 1400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10262E+00 1425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10025E+00 1450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.97970E‐01 1475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.95783E‐01 1500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.93677E‐01 1525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.91632E‐01 1550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.89663E‐01 1575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.87768E‐01 1600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.85943E‐01 1625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.84183E‐01 1650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.82485E‐01 1675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.80850E‐01 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.79274E‐01 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.77747E‐01 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.76266E‐01 1775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.74834E‐01 1800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.73451E‐01 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.72113E‐01 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.70818E‐01 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.69563E‐01 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.68347E‐01 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.67168E‐01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.66024E‐01 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.64914E‐01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.63837E‐01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.62790E‐01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.61773E‐01 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60779E‐01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.59813E‐01 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.58874E‐01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.57960E‐01 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.57071E‐01 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.56205E‐01 2225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55362E‐01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54535E‐01 2275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53730E‐01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52945E‐01 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52180E‐01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.51433E‐01 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50706E‐01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49996E‐01 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49304E‐01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48627E‐01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47968E‐01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47325E‐01 2525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46697E‐01 2550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46082E‐01 2575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45481E‐01 2600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44894E‐01 2625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44319E‐01 2650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43758E‐01 2675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43208E‐01 2700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42671E‐01 2725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42145E‐01 2750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41630E‐01 2775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41127E‐01 2800.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40633E‐01 2825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40537E‐01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40055E‐01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39583E‐01 2900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39121E‐01 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38668E‐01 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38223E‐01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37788E‐01 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37361E‐01 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36943E‐01 3050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36532E‐01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36130E‐01 3100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35735E‐01 3125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35347E‐01 3150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34966E‐01 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34593E‐01 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34227E‐01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33867E‐01 3250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33513E‐01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33167E‐01 3300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32826E‐01 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32491E‐01 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32162E‐01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31839E‐01 3400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31521E‐01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31209E‐01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30902E‐01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30600E‐01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30304E‐01 3525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30012E‐01 3550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29725E‐01 3575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29443E‐01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29166E‐01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28893E‐01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28624E‐01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28360E‐01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28100E‐01 3725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27844E‐01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27592E‐01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27344E‐01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27099E‐01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26859E‐01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26622E‐01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26389E‐01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26159E‐01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25933E‐01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25710E‐01 3975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25490E‐01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25274E‐01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25061E‐01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24851E‐01 4075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24643E‐01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24439E‐01 4125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24238E‐01 4150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24040E‐01 4175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23844E‐01 4200.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23651E‐01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23461E‐01 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23274E‐01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23089E‐01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22907E‐01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22727E‐01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22549E‐01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22374E‐01 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22201E‐01 4425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22031E‐01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21863E‐01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21697E‐01 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21533E‐01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21371E‐01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21211E‐01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21054E‐01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20898E‐01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20745E‐01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20593E‐01 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20444E‐01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20296E‐01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20150E‐01 4750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20006E‐01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19863E‐01 4800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19723E‐01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19584E‐01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19446E‐01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19311E‐01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19177E‐01 4925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19044E‐01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18914E‐01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18785E‐01 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
Start date and time 02/02/22 12:07:17
AERSCREEN 21112
Heritage Industrial Center, Operations
Heritage Industrial Center, Operations
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
METRIC ENGLISH
** AREADATA ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Emission Rate: 0.455E‐03 g/s 0.361E‐02 lb/hr
Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length: 306.41 meters 1005.28 feet
Area Source Width: 153.21 meters 502.66 feet
Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode: URBAN
Population: 275487
Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
No Building Downwash Parameters
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet
Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
** FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA **
Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K ‐9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s
Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted
DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2022.02.02_Aerscreen_HeritageIndustrialCenter_Operation.out
*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics...
Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture
Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000
Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl
Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe
FLOWSECTOR started 02/02/22 12:14:34
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
FLOWSECTOR ended 02/02/22 12:14:54
REFINE started 02/02/22 12:14:54
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
REFINE ended 02/02/22 12:14:56
**********************************************
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
***********************************************
Ending date and time 02/02/22 12:14:58
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M‐O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT
REF TA HT
0.29759E+00 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31609E+00 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33286E+00 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34760E+00 75.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36067E+00 100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37273E+00 125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38347E+00 150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
* 0.38595E+00 156.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34717E+00 175.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25173E+00 200.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20687E+00 225.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18026E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16031E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14396E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13020E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11860E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10862E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10000E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.92554E‐01 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.85949E‐01 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.80157E‐01 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.74948E‐01 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.70352E‐01 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.66224E‐01 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.62455E‐01 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.59065E‐01 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55995E‐01 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53159E‐01 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50579E‐01 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48224E‐01 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46055E‐01 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44022E‐01 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42135E‐01 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40392E‐01 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38776E‐01 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37275E‐01 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35877E‐01 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34564E‐01 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33321E‐01 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32157E‐01 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31055E‐01 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30018E‐01 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29042E‐01 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28122E‐01 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27253E‐01 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26431E‐01 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25652E‐01 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24906E‐01 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24195E‐01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23520E‐01 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22877E‐01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22265E‐01 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21682E‐01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21126E‐01 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20595E‐01 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20085E‐01 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19595E‐01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19125E‐01 1400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18675E‐01 1425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18243E‐01 1450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17829E‐01 1475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17431E‐01 1500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17048E‐01 1525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16676E‐01 1550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16317E‐01 1575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15973E‐01 1600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15640E‐01 1625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15320E‐01 1650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15011E‐01 1675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14713E‐01 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14427E‐01 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14149E‐01 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13879E‐01 1775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13619E‐01 1800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13367E‐01 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13123E‐01 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12888E‐01 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12659E‐01 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12438E‐01 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12223E‐01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12015E‐01 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11813E‐01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11617E‐01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11427E‐01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11242E‐01 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11061E‐01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10885E‐01 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10714E‐01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10548E‐01 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10386E‐01 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10228E‐01 2225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10075E‐01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.99245E‐02 2275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.97779E‐02 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.96351E‐02 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.94958E‐02 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.93601E‐02 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.92277E‐02 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.90985E‐02 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.89724E‐02 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.88494E‐02 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.87293E‐02 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.86123E‐02 2525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.84981E‐02 2550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.83862E‐02 2575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.82768E‐02 2600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.81699E‐02 2625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.80654E‐02 2650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.79632E‐02 2675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.78632E‐02 2700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.77654E‐02 2725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.76697E‐02 2750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.75761E‐02 2775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.74844E‐02 2800.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.73946E‐02 2825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.73770E‐02 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.72893E‐02 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.72034E‐02 2900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.71193E‐02 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.70368E‐02 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.69560E‐02 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.68768E‐02 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.67991E‐02 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.67229E‐02 3050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.66482E‐02 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.65750E‐02 3100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.65031E‐02 3125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.64325E‐02 3150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.63633E‐02 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.62954E‐02 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.62287E‐02 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.61632E‐02 3250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60989E‐02 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60357E‐02 3300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.59737E‐02 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.59128E‐02 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.58529E‐02 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.57941E‐02 3400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.57363E‐02 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.56795E‐02 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.56237E‐02 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55688E‐02 3500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55148E‐02 3525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54617E‐02 3550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54095E‐02 3575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53582E‐02 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53077E‐02 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52580E‐02 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52091E‐02 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.51610E‐02 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.51137E‐02 3725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50671E‐02 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50212E‐02 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49761E‐02 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49316E‐02 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48879E‐02 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48448E‐02 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48023E‐02 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47605E‐02 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47193E‐02 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46788E‐02 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46388E‐02 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45994E‐02 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45606E‐02 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45224E‐02 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44847E‐02 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44476E‐02 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44109E‐02 4150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43749E‐02 4175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43393E‐02 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43042E‐02 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42696E‐02 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42355E‐02 4275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42018E‐02 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41686E‐02 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41359E‐02 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41036E‐02 4375.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40717E‐02 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40403E‐02 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40093E‐02 4450.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39786E‐02 4475.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39484E‐02 4500.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39186E‐02 4525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38892E‐02 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38601E‐02 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38315E‐02 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38032E‐02 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37752E‐02 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37476E‐02 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37204E‐02 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36935E‐02 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36669E‐02 4750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36407E‐02 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36148E‐02 4800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35892E‐02 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35639E‐02 4850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35389E‐02 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35143E‐02 4900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34899E‐02 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34658E‐02 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34420E‐02 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34185E‐02 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0‐360 10011001
‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
mhagemann@swape.com
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:
M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.
Professional Certifications:
California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:
Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation,
stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and
Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional
Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with
EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major
military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic
characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE,
Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include
consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from
industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and
greenhouse gas emissions.
Positions Matt has held include:
•Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present);
•Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017;
•Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003);
Attachment D
2
• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004);
• Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989–
1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000);
• Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 –
1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995);
• Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:
With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports
and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard
to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions,
and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead
agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks
and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from
toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial
facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA
compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination.
• Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns.
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications
for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission.
• Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S.
• Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in
Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the
review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas
stations throughout California.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony
by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology
of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology
of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking
water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony
against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies.
• Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by
MTBE in California and New York.
3
• Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi.
• Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los
Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines.
• Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with
clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange
County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of
wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange
County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection
of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the
development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the
discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including
Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business
institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to
characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point
Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army
Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of
monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and
groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory
analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation
development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund
Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of
groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to
show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and
County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the
Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included
the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for
the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities
through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted
4
public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned
about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments,
including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water
transfer.
Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance
with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste.
• Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed
the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to
prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the
Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants.
• Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and
Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico
and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA.
• Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a
national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while
serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal
watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐
wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks.
• Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water
Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 9.
Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the
potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking
water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing
to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in
Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff.
• Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in
negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific
5
principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.
Geology:
With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for
timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical
models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource
protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the
city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later
listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern
Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling.
• Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university
levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in
environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater
contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students.
• Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California
where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public
Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and
Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las
Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
6
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at
schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE
Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater
Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust,
Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy
of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a
tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a
meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water
Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited
presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of
the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a
meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address
Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental
Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater
(and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage
Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and
State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
7
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished
report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage
Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related
to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft
Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright
Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund
Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air
Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic
Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui,
October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu,
Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air
and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases
in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater
Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of
Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐
contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
8
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of
Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations,
2009‐2011.
SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: prosenfeld@swape.com
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 October 2021
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling
Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist
Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.
M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.
B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.
Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for
evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and
transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.
Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks,
storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil
drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and
modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in
surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by
water systems and via vapor intrusion.
Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites
containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents,
pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote,
perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates
(MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from
various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the
evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist
at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert
witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an
expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad,
agricultural, and military sources.
Attachment E
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 October 2021
Professional History:
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner
UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher)
UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor
UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator
UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate
Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist
National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor
Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager
Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager
Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor
King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist
Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist
Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist
Publications:
Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil
Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48
Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property
Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C.,
(2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated
Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.
Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best
Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and
Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.
Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.
Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and
Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal
of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best
Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best
Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living
near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air
Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 October 2021
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid
Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two
Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins
And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527-
000530.
Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near
a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.
Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for
Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.
Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater,
Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.
Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food,
Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science
and Technology. 49(9),171-178.
Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme
For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC)
2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities,
and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science
and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from
Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using
High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management
Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water
Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal
of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor
emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and
Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.
Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 October 2021
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and
distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users
Network, 7(1).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids
Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters
thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third
World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.
Presentations:
Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law
Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile
organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American
Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.
Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.;
Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.
Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse,
R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis,
Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS)
Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United
States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting , Lecture conducted
from Tuscon, AZ.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United
States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the
United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture
conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in
populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air
Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and
Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing
Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from
University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A
Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 October 2021
Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst
MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment
Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted
from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3-
Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture
conducted from San Diego, CA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala,
Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And
Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on
Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia
Hotel in Oslo Norway.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And
Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility . APHA 134 Annual Meeting &
Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel,
Philadelphia, PA.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human
Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton
Hotel, Irvine California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA
Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater
Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from
Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related
Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.
Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human
Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and
Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability
and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental
Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.
Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 October 2021
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.
Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.
Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento,
California.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh
International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical
Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus
Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California
CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA
Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and
Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water
Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.
Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association . Lecture
conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a
Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from
Indianapolis, Maryland.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water
Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted
from Ocean Shores, California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery
Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur
Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th
Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue
Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil
Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from
Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 October 2021
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from
Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur
Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th
Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue
Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three
Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim
California.
Teaching Experience:
UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science
100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on
the health effects of environmental contaminants.
National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New
Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage
tanks.
National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1,
2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.
California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San
Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.
UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation
Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.
University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry,
Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.
U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.
Academic Grants Awarded:
California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.
Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.
Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.
Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.
King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of
Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on
VOC emissions. 1998.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of
polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered
Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 October 2021
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the
Tahoe National Forest. 1995.
Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts
in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:
In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois
Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants
Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-14-2021
Trial, October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty, Plaintiff vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
d/b/a AMTRAK,
Case No.: No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition, 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois
Theresa Romcoe, Plaintiff vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA
Rail, Defendants
Case No.: No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa
Mary Tryon et al., Plaintiff vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.
Case Number CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition: 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division
Robinson, Jeremy et al Plaintiffs, vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.
Case Number 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition: 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino
Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.
Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse
Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.
Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.
Case No.: 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition. 8-30-2019
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey
Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 October 2021
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division
M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido”
Defendant.
Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica
Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants
Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica
The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants
Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado
Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants
Case No.: 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District
Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants
Cause No.: 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa
Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants
Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois
Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants
Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi
Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case: No 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition, 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles
Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC
Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division
Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants
Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 October 2021
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish
Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants
Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda
Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants
Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants
Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.
Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant
Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida
Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.
Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.
Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants
Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division
James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.
Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants
Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division
Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.
Case Number 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009