Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.1 Comments_OPPOSEDWarning: External Email From:Jared Adame To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Sunday, January 30, 2022 1:07:42 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Jared Adame 4245 Allen School Ln. Bonita, CA 91902 6199448110 Warning: External Email From:anthony bartolo To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:26:05 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, anthony bartolo 3615 Trenton Ave San Diego, CA 92117 4082199009 Warning: External Email From:Mark Bennett To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:35:51 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Mark Bennett 5600 W Camino Cielo Santa Barbara, CA 93105 8056801610 Warning: External Email From:MICHAEL DULLEA To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:24:34 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, MICHAEL DULLEA 432 ARIZONA ST Chula Vista, CA 91911 6198903614 Warning: External Email From:Dawn Diaz To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:22:15 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Dawn Diaz 4243 Bonita Road Bonita, CA 91902 6194791824 Warning: External Email From:nicholas Davison To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:52:34 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, nicholas Davison 5694 Mission Center Road San Diego, CA 92108 6195593547 Warning: External Email From:Ernest Codekas To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 3:32:15 AM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Ernest Codekas 630 Briarwood Dr Brea, CA 92821 7147131077 Warning: External Email From:Gary Burrows To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Sunday, January 30, 2022 6:05:39 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Gary Burrows 4532 37th Street San Diego, CA 92116 6193663302 Warning: External Email From:Janet Farley To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:48:47 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Janet Farley 5715 Baltimore Dr Unit 68 La Mesa, CA 91942 8586997480 Warning: External Email From:Greg Finch To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:20:50 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Greg Finch 2832 Laning Road San Diego, CA 92106 6196185565 Warning: External Email From:James Gallenberger To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 1:14:53 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, James Gallenberger 6971 Wisconsin ave La Mesa, CA 91942 6192468556 Warning: External Email From:Joel Garcia To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 7:36:27 AM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Joel Garcia 427 Hillcrest Dr. Encinitas, CA 92024 6199877702 Warning: External Email From:Dennie Giles To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 7:34:17 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Dennie Giles 1086 via Miraleste Chula Vista, CA 91910 6197508733 Warning: External Email From:Vincent Gonzalez To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:23:05 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Vincent Gonzalez 11490 Forestview San Diego, CA 92131 8589226831 Warning: External Email From:Alta Gray To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 4:31:13 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. I used to own apartments in Chula Vista and then in Sacramento. We barely scraped by. Not all landlords are wealthy and we were self-employed all our lives and had no security. We needed any profit we made to live on. Please do not handicap ownership in Chula Vista. Sincerely, Alta Gray Warning: External Email From:webmaster@chulavistaca.gov To:Leilani Hines; Angelica Davis; Monica Rodriguez; Housing Advisory Commission Subject:City of Chula Vista: Housing Advisory Commission - Contact Us Date:Sunday, January 30, 2022 10:25:39 PM A new entry to a form/survey has been submitted. Form Name:Housing Advisory Commission - Contact Us Date & Time:01/30/2022 10:25 PM Response #:44 Submitter ID:102780 IP address:98.176.77.92 Time to complete:3 min. , 19 sec. Survey Details Page 1 Please feel free to contact us with any comments or questions by filling out the form below. First Name William Last Name Hall Email Address vivistar1@gmail.com Comments My name is Bill Hall and I have been investing in rental property in Chula Vista for over 40 years. During that time, I have invested heavily in property upgrades and remodels in order to keep our properties in good condition and provide a pleasant, safe, and comfortable environment for our tenants. A number of our tenants have chosen to lease these properties for extended periods of time, over 8 years in some cases. The risks and liabilities that were detailed in the proposed ordinance have encouraged my family to reconsider additional investment in Chula Vista and, in some cases, to seriously consider selling properties that we already own. I have spoken to a number of Chula Vista rental housing owners. This is a complicated issue and each of us will need to run the numbers on our properties to determine whether the provisions of the ordinance will force curtailing further construction, acquisitions, conversions or remodels for the properties we own or the investments that we may have otherwise made in Chula Vista housing stock. Today, California has some of the most comprehensive laws serving as tenant protections. I and my family members own and have owned property in other states and California already has more restrictions, protections and costly regulations than any other state that we have encountered. The specific “protection” provisions that Chula Vista staff and Council are considering are THE most draconian we have seen thus far. a. The potential for criminal charges and imprisonment for violations of a city ordinance is ill-conceived and an enormous disincentive to any potential investor in Chula Vista rental housing stock. b. The civil penalties detailed are excessive. c. The obligations that are imposed for remodels or structural upgrades are likely to make such upgrades either impossible to execute or so costly that significant property improvements will not be financially feasible. I truly do not understand how such provisions will benefit Chula Vista tenants. In the long run, Chula Vista will see a decline in rental housing stock. I urge you to NOT recommend adoption of this unneeded ordinance. Thank you, City of Chula Vista This is an automated message generated by Granicus. Please do not reply directly to this email. Warning: External Email From:Kari Hanson To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Sunday, January 30, 2022 1:12:18 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Kari Hanson 12818 DEWEY ST Los Angeles, CA 90066 3109627258 Warning: External Email From:Trang Ho To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 6:19:57 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Trang Ho 1616 W. 39th Place Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90062 6478618060 Warning: External Email From:rahil iqbal To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 6:46:13 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, rahil iqbal 605 overlook place Chula Vista, CA 91914 619739366 Warning: External Email From:Allison Logan To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 9:34:41 AM Dear Sir or Madam Member, I own a rental property in Pt Robinhood, zip code 91911. It is a 4 bedroom/2 bath house; renting for $2150/mo. I have an excellent tenant who will be displaced when I sell this property. The reason I must sell is this ordinance. While I don't make any money on this property (pretty much break even most years) and I have owned it for many years, I consider it an investment. For many years we had to put in money each year (lost money). I have invested considerable money into this house as it was in disgraceful condition when I purchased it, restoring it to a very comfortable home for a family to occupy. This is the service that most landlords provide; they maintain clean and comfortable homes for people who either don't want to buy or can't afford to buy their own homes. If you pass this ordinance all of the people you think you are helping will find themselves with fewer and fewer (mostly high-priced) options because the Mom & Pop style providers will be forced out of business and the big corporations will be the only one's who can afford to stay in business. It's a lose-lose for the citizens of the City of Chula Vista. Please consider enforcing the laws which are already on the books instead of creating more onerous regulations that hurt the very people you want to protect. As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Allison Logan 510 Country Club Lane Coronado, CA 92118 6193163726 Warning: External Email From:Lucinda Lilley To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:23:02 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Lucinda Lilley 2702 Qualtrough Street San Diego, CA 92106 619-286-4721 Warning: External Email From:Dante Laura To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 5:21:09 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Dante Laura 1349, Ridgeview Way Bonita, CA 91902 6193704725 Warning: External Email From:Mike Jorgensen To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:24:13 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Mike Jorgensen 5580 warbler way La Jolla, CA 92037 6199777150 Warning: External Email From:Thomas Lowe To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 9:57:13 AM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Thomas Lowe 1142 Moana Drive San Diego, CA 92107 6192227277 Warning: External Email From:Mike Lynch To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 4:03:58 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Mike Lynch 31660 Mountain Way Bonsall, CA 92003 8587752450 Warning: External Email From:Aurora Murillo To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the proposed Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 4:27:05 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a responsible resident, but it is often necessary when the resident is damaging the private property, a child is returning from college, or the owner suffers financial distress and needs to move in. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly create the conditions for us housing providers to lose the property. Appraisers do not care if it was the tenant that damaged or neglected the house and the bank will not approve the loan necessary to do the reconstruction or upgrades. As rental housing providers, we have a strict set of laws that apply to us already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. We may not conduct routine inspections to protect the integrity of the house unless the tenant reports or request a repair. They often allow a simple repair to turn into a costly one because they are in breach of the rental agreement. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. Due to the pandemic, as you have seen on social media, the attacks on housing providers have been virtual bullying. With federal, state, and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be bullied out of business. The housing crisis did not end with all the 'protections' put in place during the pandemic. Many limits were recently placed on house providers that were not placed on any other business that raised their fees, prices, labor pay to adjust for inflation. Yet, the discrimination against housing providers is increasing. Please don't make it harder for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Keep in mind that for a housing provider with single properties it takes 10-15 years to see their income match or exceed the mortgage payment. To have a mortgage payment that is affordable a 20-40% investment was paid in the form of a down payment. Tenants are not held responsible for the destruction to private property that they caused. Many leave unwilling to provide a forwarding address because to move in the house must be habitable but as they move out they leave it inhabitable. We have nothing to keep tenants from bullying homeowners. Nothing allows a real estate agent to show the house if the tenant does not allow entry. Nothing allows homeowners to conduct semi-annual inspections to ensure the house has been maintained as it was when the tenants took possession. But tenants believe they are bypassing the requirements of the banks and loan offices to receive a home loan. They claim that they are purchasing the house and have a right to destroy it, alter it, sublease it, or turn it into their construction business yard. Please help us work on a balanced approach to resolve the housing issue without punishing the homeowner for daring to invest in a second home and allow strangers to use it. Sincerely, Aurora Murillo 808 Plaza Sierra Chula Vista, CA 91910 6194206946 Warning: External Email From:clyde pate To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 2:16:09 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. My tenants said I killed my dad, let the bathtub faucet run for over 6 months without letting fix it. I you want to live on my property you have to respect it and me. Sincerely, clyde pate 3768 floresta way Warning: External Email From:sandra parsley To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:27:41 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, sandra parsley 378 la soledad way Oceanside, CA 92057 7606722525 Warning: External Email From:Robert O"Dwyer To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 5:21:11 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Robert O'Dwyer 11507 Westview Parkway San Diego, CA 92126 8582719999 Warning: External Email From:Patricia Nelson To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:23:06 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Patricia Nelson 832 Wiler Dr Chula Vista, CA 91910 6194219456 Warning: External Email From:David Nelson To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:22:45 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, David Nelson 832 Wiler Dr Chula Vista, CA 91910 6194219456 Warning: External Email From:Magdalena Murillo To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 4:32:37 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Magdalena Murillo 2210 Delany Drive San Ysidro, Ca San Diego, CA 92173 6194287716 Warning: External Email From:Christopher Mapanao To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 4:47:00 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Christopher Mapanao 437 Plaza Calimar Chula Vista CA Chula Vista, CA 91914 9171291965 Warning: External Email From:John McCartney To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 7:34:57 AM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, John McCartney 4532 37th St San Diego, CA 92116 6195789652 Warning: External Email From:Bridget Potterton To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Rental Housing Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 4:31:03 PM Hello, I'm writing to oppose the new and far-reaching just-cause evictions regulations that risk putting independent “mom-and-pop” housing providers out of business and creating blight in our communities. These actions will impact us as the proponents of these regulations will work to see this same ordinance adopted in every city throughout the County of San Diego. Please do not make it any worse for landlords than it already has. Regards, Bridget Potterton Warning: External Email From:Marshall Rice To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 7:49:40 AM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Marshall Rice 3828 Arizona St San Diego, CA 92104 6198573666 Warning: External Email From:Pat Russiano To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 4:27:45 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista, but will result in damage to our existing and limited housing stock and housing providers. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, most especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. But common sense tells you that making it harder to provide housing and make economic business decisions, in other wise allow private property decisions to be made by the owners, the housing providers will in many instances remove the housing by selling and providing housing where it becomes sensible. That is not a stretch when you consider that disallowing removing the housing stock may become unlawful. Why would that be? No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and if so, collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Pat Russiano PO Box 1742 Bonita, CA 91908 6192521199 Warning: External Email From:Irma Serena To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Sunday, January 30, 2022 1:09:25 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Irma Serena 4362 43rd St. San Diego, CA 92105 6196549027 Warning: External Email From:Leon Shoag To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 4:05:07 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Leon Shoag 4120 Locust Ave Long Beach, CA 90807 5628824060 Warning: External Email From:William Snell To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 5:43:31 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I would pass on to you a quote from (President) Calvin Coolidge: "It is much more important to kill bad bills than it is to pass good ones." There is very little evidence that more law of this sort is necessary or even potentially helpful. William D. Snell Sincerely, William Snell 805 Creekwood Way Chula Vista, CA 91913 6194821872 Warning: External Email From:Robert Snyder To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 4:44:13 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Robert Snyder 2868 bayside walk San Diego, CA 92109 3163123583 Warning: External Email From:Mary Anne Stevens To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:30:08 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Mary Anne Stevens 1455 Frazee Road #110A San Diego, CA 92108 6198710635 Warning: External Email From:webmaster@chulavistaca.gov To:Leilani Hines; Angelica Davis; Monica Rodriguez; Housing Advisory Commission Subject:City of Chula Vista: Housing Advisory Commission - Contact Us Date:Sunday, January 30, 2022 6:40:51 PM A new entry to a form/survey has been submitted. Form Name:Housing Advisory Commission - Contact Us Date & Time:01/30/2022 6:40 PM Response #:43 Submitter ID:102777 IP address:2600:1700:e9a0:1a50:4418:b0e6:b264:7d99 Time to complete:45 min. , 35 sec. Survey Details Page 1 Please feel free to contact us with any comments or questions by filling out the form below. First Name Mitchell Last Name Thompson Email Address mitchthompsonmitch@gmail.com Comments I submitted prior comments. After further review of the staff report, I am further convinced that the ordinance was drafted before any analysis was done by staff of the need for the ordinance. Staff provides a 3-year history of phone calls from SCA San Diego. Notably, you received an average of one phone call per year regarding possible harrassment. Nine total calls per year regarding evictions and an average of one call per year regarding landlord retaliation. These are merely phone calls and nothing else. The data provides NO COMELLING EVIDENCE OF A NEED FOR THIS ORDINANCE. The information indicates that the appropriate recommendation would be either: 1) do nothing and recommend against, or 2) study the issue in more depth. Thank you, City of Chula Vista This is an automated message generated by Granicus. Please do not reply directly to this email. Warning: External Email From:Susan Tucker To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 6:06:38 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Susan Tucker 10861 New Salem Place San Diego, CA 92126 8586219003 Warning: External Email From:Inesa Vasilonoka To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 6:53:07 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Inesa Vasilonoka 6704 SAN MIGUEL ROAD Bonita, CA 91902 6195733700 Warning: External Email From:David Walsh To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 5:34:45 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, David Walsh 13662 Laurelhurst Road Moorpark, CA 93021 8053418751 Warning: External Email From:John Weidner To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 11:40:33 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, John Weidner 3081 Conner Way San Diego, CA 92117 8582727212 Warning: External Email From:Jason Whitaker To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 3:41:18 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Jason Whitaker 3228 Nile Street San Diego, CA 92104 6197504092 Warning: External Email From:James Wood To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Saturday, January 29, 2022 5:33:23 AM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. I feel it’s completely unfair to place unfair and undue hardships on good Landlords I think there should be a way to set up a way to eliminate bad landlords without giving people a way to manipulate good landlords into costly situations which would make even good owners to possibly remove there rental units and even eliminate the already short supply of rentals to only owner properties without helping San Diego supplying housing Sincerely, James Wood 1550 Goldfield Street San Diego, CA 92110 8585681586 Warning: External Email From:Jeff Zettel To:Housing Advisory Commission Subject:Please Reject the Tenant Protection Ordinance Date:Friday, January 28, 2022 4:17:32 PM Dear Sir or Madam Member, As a rental housing provider, I am writing to respectfully request that you reject the proposed Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. These new set of onerous laws are unnecessary and will not have a positive impact on Chula Vista. In reading the staff report, the regulations being proposed are in response to complaints from residents at two rental properties. It is simply bad policy to create new laws in response to just a few bad actors, especially when remedies are already available. No other data has been provided to support the creation of the ordinance. Also of great concern is that no study of the economic impacts on the City and its residents or housing supply has been conducted. No one wants to displace a resident, but it is often necessary for financial reasons or to upgrade the property. The costly relocation payments in the proposed ordinance will certainly deter the investment needed for our aging housing stock. Rental housing providers have a strict set of laws that apply to them already, including Just Cause and Harassment protections. The additional harassment items in this proposed ordinance are vague and will lead to frivolous lawsuits even for the most ethical of housing providers. With federal, state and now proposed city and private actions for harassment, housing providers could be financially drained. Please don't make it hard for me to provide much-needed rental housing. Reject the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Instead of this rushed approach, bring stakeholders together to see if problems truly exist and collaborate to create fair and balanced solutions for the betterment of the entire community. Sincerely, Jeff Zettel 7171 Astoria Street San Diego, CA 92111 9493751440