Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Attachment 7.d.vii. - Appendices F-GHG Report_Revised
Greenhouse Gas Analysis for the Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Chula Vista, California Prepared for Acadia Healthcare 6100 Tower Circle #1000 Franklin, TN 37067 Prepared by RECON Environmental, Inc. 3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92108-5726 P 619.308.9333 RECON Number 9434 September 24, 2020 Revised: May 4, 2021 Jack T. Emerson, Environmental Analyst Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................ iii Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Purpose of the Report ......................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Description ............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Fundamentals of Climate Change ..................................................................... 2 2.0 Existing Conditions......................................................................................... 7 2.1 Existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................. 7 3.0 Regulatory Framework .................................................................................. 9 3.1 Federal Regulations ......................................................................................... 10 3.2 State Regulations ............................................................................................. 11 3.3 Local .................................................................................................................. 14 4.0 Significance Criteria .................................................................................... 15 4.1 State CEQA Guidelines .................................................................................... 15 4.2 Greenhouse Gas Significance Thresholds ........................................................ 16 5.0 Emissions Modeling ...................................................................................... 17 5.1 Methodology and Assumptions ........................................................................ 17 6.0 GHG Impact Analysis ................................................................................... 21 6.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .............................................................................. 21 6.2 Applicable Plans, Policies, and Regulations Intended to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions .............................................................................. 21 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................... 24 8.0 References Cited ............................................................................................ 25 FIGURES 1: Regional Location .......................................................................................................... 3 2: Project Location on Aerial Photograph ......................................................................... 4 3: Site Plan ........................................................................................................................ 5 Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) TABLES 1: Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes ............................................. 7 2: California GHG Emissions by Sector in 1990, 2005, and 2017 ................................... 8 3: City of Chula Vista Community GHG Emissions ........................................................ 9 4: San Diego Gas & Electric Intensity Factors................................................................19 5: Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimate .............................................................21 6: Climate Action Plan Consistency Analysis .................................................................22 ATTACHMENT 1: Emergency Generator Specifications 2: CalEEMod Output Files Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project iii Acronyms and Abbreviations AB Assembly Bill AQMD Air Quality Management District BAU business as usual CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model CalGreen California Green Building Standards Code CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery CAP Climate Action Plan CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CH4 methane City City of Chula Vista CO2 carbon dioxide CO2E carbon dioxide equivalent EO Executive Order GHG greenhouse gas GWP Global warming potential kW kilowatt kWh kilowatt-hour MMT million metric ton MPO Metropolitan Planning Organizations MT metric ton MWh megawatt hour N2O nitrous oxide project Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project PV photovoltaic RPS Renewables Portfolio Standard RTP Regional Transportation Plan SB Senate Bill SDAPCD San Diego Air Pollution Control District SDG&E San Diego Gas & Electric U.S. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 1 Executive Summary The Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project (project) is located 830 and 831 Showroom Place in the EastLake Business Center II Sectional Planning Area of the city of Chula Vista. The 10.4-acre project site was previously graded and is currently undeveloped. The project would construct a 120-bed behavioral health facility in a 92,349-square-foot building with exterior activity areas and a staff outdoor area. This report evaluates the potential global climate change impacts associated with the project. In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this analysis evaluates the significance of the global climate change impacts in terms of whether (1) the project would result in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that may have a significant impact on the environment and (2) the project would conflict with plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The City of Chula Vista (City) has not adopted its own GHG Thresholds of Significance for CEQA; this analysis follows guidance from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD). Guidance from South Coast AQMD recommends a tiered approach for land use development projects. As the project is subject to CEQA (Tier 1) and is project emissions have not been addressed be a regional GHG emissions reduction plan (Tier 2), the project is assessed against the Tier 3 Residential/Commercial Screening Level of 3,000 metric tons (MT) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2E). Project-related GHG emission sources include construction (off-road vehicles, worker trips, and truck trips), mobile (on-road vehicles), area sources (landscape maintenance equipment), water and wastewater, and solid waste. Project emissions were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2016.3.2. The project would result in the annual equivalent of 2,986 MT CO2E, which less than the 3,000 MT CO2E Residential/Commercial Screening Level. GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. Significance screening levels from South Coast AQMD guidance are based on the concept of establishing a 90 percent GHG emission market capture rate. The aggregate emissions from all projects with individual annual emissions that are equal to or less than applicable screening levels would not impede achievement of the state GHG emissions reduction targets. Therefore, as the project GHG emissions would be less than the applicable screening level, the project would not conflict with plans to achieve statewide GHG emissions reduction targets. In 2017, the City released a new Climate Action Plan (CAP). The project would be consistent with all applicable reduction strategies from the CAP. Therefore the project would not conflict with local plans for the purpose of reducing the emission of GHGs and impacts would be less than significant. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 2 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Report This report evaluates the significance of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with the Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project (project). This report characterizes existing conditions at the project site and in the region, identifies applicable rules and regulations, and assesses impacts to climate change from construction and operation of the project. The significance of potential GHG impacts is assessed following guidance from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD). 1.2 Project Description The project is located at 830 and 831 Showroom Place in the city of Chula Vista, California, north Fenton Street, west of Hunte Parkway, and east of Lane Avenue. The project site is a previously graded pad in the EastLake Business Center Specific Plan area and is bounded by single-family residential uses to the north and southeast, commercial uses to the west and south. Specifically, the project site sits adjacent to The District at Eastlake, which is nearly fully developed with commercial uses and parking. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses such as restaurants, and family-oriented businesses, providing play areas and classes for adults and children. A number of these businesses include Eastlake Speed Circuit, Crunch Select Gym, Ninja Factory, Sky Zone, Play City, Pride Martial Arts, Kid Ventures, Sylvan Learning Center, Little Artists, DanceArts, and Floaties Swim School. The Eastlake Montessori School is also located within The District at Eastlake. The 10.4-acre project site is a previously graded pad in the EastLake Business Center and is currently undeveloped. The project site is bounded by single-family residential uses to the north and southeast, commercial uses to the west and south, and aA boat and recreational vehicle storage lot to the south. Figure 1 shows the regional location of the project. Figure 2 shows an aerial photograph of the project and vicinity. The project would construct a 120-bed behavioral health facility in a 92,349-square-foot building with exterior activity areas and a staff outdoor area. Figure 3 shows the site plan. 1.3 Fundamentals of Climate Change 1.3.1 Understanding Global Climate Change Global climate change is a change in the average weather of the earth, which can be measured by wind patterns, storms, precipitation, and temperature. The earth’s climate is in a state of constant flux with periodic warming and cooling cycles. Extreme periods of cooling are termed “ice ages,” which may then be followed by extended periods of warmth. For most of the earth’s geologic history, these periods of warming and cooling have been the result of many complicated interacting natural factors that include: volcanic eruptions that spew gases and particles (dust) into the atmosphere; the amount of water, vegetation, and ice covering the earth’s surface; subtle changes in the earth’s orbit; and the amount of energy released by the sun (sun cycles). However, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution around 1750, the average temperature of the earth has been increasing at a rate that is faster than can be explained by natural climate cycles alone. FIGURE 1 Regional Location kj USMC AIR STATION MIRAMAR USMC AIR STATION MIRAMAR Los Penasquitos Canyon Presv Mission Trails Regional Park Cleveland NF Sutherland Lake Batiquitos Lagoon Lake Hodges El Capitan Reservoir San Vicente Reservoir Loveland Reservoir Sweetwater Reservoir Lower Otay ReservoirSanDieguitoRiver Du lz u ra C r e e k S w e e tw a te r R ive rS a n t a Y s a b e lC r e e k SanDie g u ito Rive r O t a y R i v e rEscondidoCreek Sweetwat e r RiverS a n D ie g o R i v e r Jamul Indian Village Sycuan Reservation Capitan Grande Reservation Barona Reservation Bostonia Casa de Oro-Mount Helix Crest Fairbanks Ranch Granite Hills Harbison Canyon Jamul Lakeside La Presa Ramona Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe San Diego Country Estates Spring Valley Winter Gardens UV163 UV282 UV78 UV905 UV56 UV54 UV75 UV125 UV67 UV94 UV52 §¨¦8 §¨¦805 §¨¦15 §¨¦5 S A N D I E G O C O U N T Y M E X I C O Carlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas Escondido Imperial Beach La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Poway San Diego San Marcos Santee Solana Beach kj USMC AIR STATION MIRAMAR USMC AIR STATION MIRAMAR Los Penasquitos Canyon Presv Mission Trails Regional Park Cleveland NF Sutherland Lake Batiquitos Lagoon Lake Hodges El Capitan Reservoir San Vicente Reservoir Loveland Reservoir Sweetwater Reservoir Lower Otay ReservoirSanDieguitoRiver Du lz u ra C r e e k S w e e tw a te r R ive rS a n t a Y s a b e lC r e e k SanDie g u ito Rive r O t a y R i v e rEscondidoCreek Sweetwat e r RiverS a n D ie g o R i v e r Jamul Indian Village Sycuan Reservation Capitan Grande Reservation Barona Reservation Bostonia Casa de Oro-Mount Helix Crest Fairbanks Ranch Granite Hills Harbison Canyon Jamul Lakeside La Presa Ramona Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe San Diego Country Estates Spring Valley Winter Gardens UV163 UV282 UV78 UV905 UV56 UV54 UV75 UV125 UV67 UV94 UV52 §¨¦8 §¨¦805 §¨¦15 §¨¦5 S A N D I E G O C O U N T Y M E X I C O Carlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas Escondido Imperial Beach La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Poway San Diego San Marcos Santee Solana Beach 0 5Miles [ M:\JOBS5\9434\common_gis\fig1.mxd 3/18/2019 bma SAN DIEGO RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO ORANGE MEXICO Project Locationkj FIGURE 2 Project Location on Aerial Photograph W INDW ARD WAYSTO N E CAN Y O N R D W ATERLINE W AYSTARBOARD STNORTH VALL E YVI EWDRJETTY LNYOSE M I T E W A YANCHORAGE PL RIVER ROCK RD HITACHI W AYMAST WAY C A TA M A R A N W A Y O TA Y L AKES RD LEEWARD WAY TABLEROCKAVEYOSEMITE D RCREE K S I D E PLFENTON ST E S P E R ANZAPL WI NDCAVEPLBRYCECANYONAVEHAROLDPLSHOW ROOMPLHUNTE PKYW INDW ARD WAYSTO N E CAN Y O N R D W ATERLINE W AYSTARBOARD STNORTH VALL E YVI EWDRJETTY LNYOSE M I T E W A YANCHORAGE PL RIVER ROCK RD HITACHI W AYMAST WAY C A TA M A R A N W A Y O TA Y L AKES RD LEEWARD WAY TABLEROCKAVEYOSEMITE D RCREE K S I D E PLFENTON ST E S P E R ANZAPL WI NDCAVEPLBRYCECANYONAVEHAROLDPLSHOW ROOMPLHUNTE PKYImage Source: Nearmap (Flown February 2019) 0 300Feet [ Project Boundary M:\JOBS5\9434\common_gis\fig2.mxd 3/18/2019 bma PROPERTY LINE PRO P ER T Y L IN EENIL YTREPORPPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEENIL YTREPORPSHOWROOM PLACE BUILDING PARKING FIRE TRUCK ACCESS EXTERIOR ACTIVITY AREA EXTERIOR ACTIVITY AREA EXTERIOR ACTIVITY AREA EXTERIOR ACTIVITY AREAEXTERIOR ACTIVITY AREA PARKING PARKINGPARKING FLEXIBLE RECREATION LAWN EXTERIOR ACTIVITY AREA BUILDING BUILDING 48 east holly streetpasadena, ca 91103tel: 626.793.9805 fax: 626.793.9807• ARCHITECTS 2605 State Street, Suite B San Diego, CA 92103 619 234 1010 GroundLevelSD.com LATIPSOH HTLAEH LAROIVAHEB EKAL TSAE41919 AC ,ATSIV ALUHC ,ECALP MOORWOHS 138 & 038ERACHTLAEH AIDACA0 NORTH 50' 100' 200'"0-'001='1SITE PLAN L1-1 M:\JOBS5\9434\air\graphics\EIR\Figure3.ai 07/01/20 Map Source: SWA Architects FIGURE 3 Site Plan Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 6 With the Industrial Revolution came an increase in the combustion of carbon-based fuels such as wood, coal, oil, natural gas, and biomass. Industrial processes have also created emissions of substances not found in nature. This in turn has led to a marked increase in the emissions of gases shown to influence the world’s climate. These gases, termed “greenhouse” gases, influence the amount of heat trapped in the earth’s atmosphere. Because recently observed increased concentrations of GHGs in the atmosphere are related to increased emissions resulting from human activity, the current cycle of “global warming” is generally believed to be largely due to human activity. Of late, the issue of global warming or global climate change has arguably become the most important and widely debated environmental issue in the United States and the world. Because it is the collective of human actions taking place throughout the world that contributes to climate change, it is quintessentially a global or cumulative issue. 1.3.2 Greenhouse Gases of Primary Concern There are numerous GHGs, both naturally occurring and manmade. Each GHG has variable atmospheric lifetime and global warming potential (GWP). The atmospheric lifetime of the gas is the average time a molecule stays stable in the atmosphere. Most GHGs have long atmospheric lifetimes, staying in the atmosphere hundreds or thousands of years. GWP is a measure of the potential for a gas to trap heat and warm the atmosphere. Although GWP is related to its atmospheric lifetime, many other factors including chemical reactivity of the gas also influence GWP. GWP is reported as a unitless factor representing the potential for the gas to affect global climate relative to the potential of carbon dioxide (CO2). Because CO2 is the reference gas for establishing GWP, by definition its GWP is 1. Although methane (CH4) has a shorter atmospheric lifetime than CO2, it has a 100- year GWP of 28; this means that CH4 has 28 times more effect on global warming than CO2 on a molecule-by-molecule basis. The GWP is officially defined as “[T]he cumulative radiative forcing—both direct and indirect effects—integrated over a period of time from the emission of a unit mass of gas relative to some reference gas” (United States Environmental Protection Agency [U.S. EPA] 2010). GHG emissions estimates are typically represented in terms of metric tons (MT) of CO2 equivalent (CO2E). CO2E emissions are the product of the amount of each gas by its GWP. The effects of several GHGs may be discussed in terms of MT CO2E and can be summed to represent the total potential of these gases to warm the global climate. Table 1 summarizes some of the most common GHGs. All of the gases in Table 1 are produced by both biogenic (natural) and anthropogenic (human) sources. These are the GHGs of primary concern in this analysis. CO2 would be emitted by the project due to the combustion of fossil fuels in vehicles (including construction), from electricity generation and natural gas consumption, water use, and from solid waste disposal. Smaller amounts of CH4 and nitrous oxide (N2O) would be emitted from the same project operations. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 7 Table 1 Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes Gas Atmospheric Lifetime (years) 100-year GWP 20-year GWP Carbon dioxide (CO2) 50–200 1 1 Methane (CH4)* 12.4 28 84 Nitrous oxide (N2O) 121 265 264 HFC-23 222 12,400 10,800 HFC-32 5.2 677 2,430 HFC-125 28.2 3,170 6,090 HFC-134a 13.4 1,300 3,710 HFC-143a 47.1 4,800 6,940 HFC-152a 1.5 138 506 HFC-227ea 38.9 3,350 5,360 HFC-236fa 242 8,060 6,940 HFC-43-10mee 16.1 1,650 4,310 CF4 50,000 6,630 4,880 C2F6 10,000 11,100 8,210 C3F8 2,600 8,900 6,640 C4F10 2,600 9,200 6,870 c-C4F8 3,200 9,540 7,110 C5F12 4,100 8,550 6,350 C6F14 3,100 7,910 5,890 SF6 3,200 23,500 17,500 SOURCE: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014. 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 Existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions 2.1.1 Statewide GHG Inventory The CARB performs statewide GHG inventories. The inventory is divided into nine broad sectors of economic activity: agriculture, commercial, electricity generation, forestry, high GWP emitters, industrial, recycling and waste, residential, and transportation. Emissions are quantified in million metric tons (MMT) of CO2E. Table 2 shows the estimated statewide GHG emissions for the years 1990, 2005, and 2017. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 8 Table 2 California GHG Emissions by Sector in 1990, 2005, and 2017 Sector 1990 Emissions in MMT CO2E (% total)1,2 2005 Emissions in MMT CO2E (% total)2,3,4 2017 Emissions in MMT CO2E (% total)2,3,4 Sources Agriculture 23.4 (5%) 33.70 (7%) 32.42 (8%) Commercial 14.4 (3%) 14.26 (3%) 15.14 (4%) Electricity Generation 110.6 (26%) 107.85 (22%) 62.39 (15%) High GWP -- 9.26 (2%) 19.99 (5%) Industrial 103.0 (24%) 95.93 (20%) 89.40 (21%) Recycling and Waste -- 7.78 (2%) 8.89 (2%) Residential 29.7 (7%) 28.81 (6%) 26.00 (6%) Transportation 150.7 (35%) 189.05 (39%) 169.86 (40%) Forestry (Net CO2 flux)5 -6.5 -- -- Not Specified 1.3 -- -- TOTAL 426.6 486.65 424.10 SOURCE: CARB 2007 and 2019. MMT CO2E = million metric tons of CO2 equivalent 1 1990 data was retrieved from the CARB 2007 source. 2 Quantities and percentages may not total properly due to rounding. 3 2005 and 2017 data were retrieved from the CARB 2019 source. 4 Reported emissions for key sectors. The inventory totals for 2005 and 2017 did not include Forestry or Not Specified sources. As shown in Table 2, statewide GHG source emissions totaled about 427 MMT CO2E in 1990, 487 MMT CO2E in 2005, and 424 MMT CO2E in 2017. Many factors affect year-to-year changes in GHG emissions, including economic activity, demographic influences, environmental conditions such as drought, and the impact of regulatory efforts to control GHG emissions. However, transportation-related emissions consistently contribute the most GHG emissions, followed by electricity generation and industrial emissions. 2.1.2 Local GHG Inventory As part of the City of Chula Vista’s (City) Climate Action Program, the Department of Public Works’ Conservation Section performs emission inventories to identify GHG sources and help guide policy decisions. The City’s community-wide GHG emissions were calculated using the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives’ U.S. Community Protocol. The results of the community inventory for 1990, 2005, 2012, and 2014 are summarized in Table 3. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 9 Table 3 City of Chula Vista Community GHG Emissions (MT CO2E) Source 1990 Emissions 2005 Emissions 2012 Emissions 2014 Emissions 2016 Emissions Transportation 335,435 717,256 851,386 740,584 681,000 Energy Use Residential Commercial Industrial 391,606 197,115 71,363 123,128 471,180 247,559 182,951 41,670 505,311 266,438 204,818 34,055 403,038 221,923 181,115† 416,000† Solid Waste 78,539 60,780 50,717 67,245 41,000 Potable Water (embedded energy) — 50,062 40,819 30,810 11,000 Waste Water 9,607 15,457 7,962 7,826 3,000 Community Emissions 815,186 1,315,734 1,456,195 1,249,503 1,152,000 Municipal Vehicle Fleet 4,655 9,282 6,802 5,802 3,176 Municipal Energy Use Buildings External Lights Sewage 24,969 3,728 20,260 981 8,771 5,856 2,896 19 6,590 4,321 2,247 22 5,041 3,646 1,370 25 3.825 2,734 1,077 14 Municipal Solid Waste 2,356 1,830 2,296 1,983 2,055 Municipal Water (embedded energy) — — 1,133 1,250 684 Municipal Emissions 31,980 19,883 16,821 14,076 9,740 Total Emissions 847,166 1,335,617 1,473,016 1,263,579 1,161,740 MT CO2E = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent SOURCE: City of Chula Vista 2014, 2018, 2020a, and 2020b. †Commercial and Industrial energy usage was merged in the 2014 inventory due to privacy concerns. Residential, Commercial, and Industrial energy usage was merged in the 2016 inventory. 2.1.3 On-site GHG Emissions Sources The site was previously graded and includes two stormwater retention basins. The project site is currently undeveloped, thus it is not a source of anthropogenic GHG emissions. Additionally, the limited vegetation on-site does not provide a measurable amount of carbon sequestration. 3.0 Regulatory Framework In response to rising concern associated with increasing GHG emissions and global climate change impacts, several plans and regulations have been adopted at the international, national, and state levels with the aim of reducing GHG emissions. The following is a discussion of the state and local plans and regulations most applicable to the project. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 10 3.1 Federal Regulations 3.1.1 Environmental Protection Agency The U.S. EPA has many federal level programs and projects to reduce GHG emissions. The U.S. EPA provides technical expertise and encourages voluntary reductions from the private sector. One of the voluntary programs applicable to the project is the Energy Star program. Energy Star products such as appliances, building products, heating and cooling equipment, and other energy-efficient equipment may be utilized by the project. Energy Star is a joint program of U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Energy, which promotes energy efficient products and practices. Tools and initiatives include the Energy Star Portfolio Manager, which helps track and assess energy and water consumption across an entire portfolio of buildings, and the Energy Star Most Efficient 2020, which provides information on exceptional products which represent the leading edge in energy efficient products in the year 2020 (U.S. EPA 2020a). The U.S. EPA also collaborates with the public sector, including states, tribes, localities, and resource managers, to encourage smart growth, sustainability preparation, and renewable energy and climate change preparation. These initiatives include the Clean Energy-Environment State Partnership Program, the Climate Ready Water Utilities Initiative, the Climate Ready Estuaries Program, and the Sustainable Communities Partnership (U.S. EPA 2020b). 3.1.2 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards The federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards determine the fuel efficiency of certain vehicle classes in the U.S. The first phase of the program applied to passenger cars, new light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger cars with model years 2012 through 2016, and required these vehicles to achieve a standard equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon. The second phase of the program applies to model years 2017 through 2025 and increased the standards to 54.5 miles per gallon. Separate standards were also established for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. The first phase applied to model years 2014 through 2018 and the second phase applies to model years 2018 through 2027. With improved gas mileage, fewer gallons of transportation fuel would be combusted to travel the same distance, thereby reducing nationwide GHG emissions associated with vehicle travel. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 11 3.2 State Regulations 3.2.1 Statewide GHG Emission Targets S-3-05—Statewide GHG Emission Targets This executive order (EO) establishes the following GHG emissions reduction targets for the state of California: • by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; • by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; and • by 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. This EO also directs the Secretary of the California EPA to oversee the efforts made to reach these targets, and to prepare biannual reports on the progress made toward meeting the targets and on the impacts to California related to global warming, including impacts to water supply, public health, agriculture, the coastline, and forestry. With regard to impacts, the report shall also prepare and report on mitigation and adaptation plans to combat the impacts. The first Climate Action Team Assessment Report was produced in March 2006, and has been updated every two years. B-30-15—2030 Statewide GHG Emission Goal This EO, issued on April 29, 2015, establishes an interim GHG emission reduction goal for the state of California to reduce GHG emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. This EO also directs all state agencies with jurisdiction over GHG-emitting sources to implement measures designed to achieve the new interim 2030 goal, as well as the pre-existing, long-term 2050 goal identified in EO S-3-05. Additionally, this EO directs CARB to update its Climate Change Scoping Plan to address the 2030 goal. CARB is expected to develop statewide inventory projection data for 2030, as well as commence its efforts to identify reduction strategies capable of securing emission reductions that allow for achievement of the EO’s new interim goal. 3.2.2 California Global Warming Solutions Act In response to EO S-3-05, the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, and thereby enacted Sections 38500– 38599 of the California Health and Safety Code. The heart of AB 32 is its requirement that CARB establish an emissions cap and adopt rules and regulations that would reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. AB 32 also required CARB to adopt a plan by January 1, 2009, indicating how emission reductions would be achieved from significant GHG sources via regulations, market mechanisms, and other actions. In 2008, CARB estimated that annual statewide GHG emissions were 427 MMT CO2E in 1990 and would reach 596 MMT CO2E by 2020 under a business as usual (BAU) condition (CARB 2008). To achieve the mandate of AB 32, CARB determined that a 169 MMT CO2E Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 12 (or approximate 28.5 percent) reduction in BAU emissions was needed by 2020. In 2010, CARB prepared an updated 2020 forecast to account for the recession and slower forecasted growth. CARB determined that the economic downturn reduced the 2020 BAU by 55 MMT CO2E; as a result, achieving the 1990 emissions level by 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of 21.7 (not 28.5) percent from the 2020 BAU. California has been on track to achieve 1990 levels, and based on the GHG inventories shown in Table 2, achieved the goal by 2017. Approved in September 2016, Senate Bill (SB) 32 updates the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 and enacts EO B-30-15. Under SB 32, the state would reduce its GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. This is equivalent to an emissions level of approximately 260 MMT CO2E for 2030. In implementing the 40 percent reduction goal, CARB is required to prioritize emissions reductions to consider the social costs of the emissions of GHGs; where “social costs” is defined as “an estimate of the economic damages, including, but not limited to, changes in net agricultural productivity; impacts to public health; climate adaptation impacts, such as property damages from increased flood risk; and changes in energy system costs, per metric ton of greenhouse gas emission per year.” 3.2.3 Climate Change Scoping Plan As directed by the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, in 2008, CARB adopted the Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change (2008 Scoping Plan). The 2008 Scoping Plan identifies the main strategies the State of California will implement to achieve the GHG reductions necessary to reduce statewide forecasted BAU GHG emissions in 2020 to the state’s historic 1990 emissions level (CARB 2008). In November 2017, CARB released the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update, the Strategy for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target (2017 Scoping Plan; CARB 2017). The 2017 Scoping Plan identifies state strategies for achieving the state’s 2030 interim GHG emissions reduction target codified by SB 32. Measures under the 2017 Scoping Plan Scenario build on existing programs such as the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Advanced Clean Cars Program, Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS), Sustainable Communities Strategy, Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy, and the Cap-and-Trade Program. Additionally, the 2017 Scoping Plan proposes new policies to address GHG emissions from natural and working lands. 3.2.4 Renewables Portfolio Standard The RPS promotes diversification of the state’s electricity supply and decreased reliance on fossil fuel energy sources. Originally adopted in 2002 with a goal to achieve a 20 percent renewable energy mix by 2020 (referred to as the “Initial RPS”), the goal has been accelerated and increased by EOs S-14-08 and S-21-09 to a goal of 33 percent by 2020. In April 2011, SB 2 (1X) codified California’s 33 percent RPS goal. In September 2015, the California Legislature passed SB 350, which increases California’s renewable energy mix goal to 50 percent by year 2030. Renewable energy includes (but is not limited to) wind, solar, geothermal, small hydroelectric, biomass, anaerobic digestion, and landfill gas. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 13 3.2.5 Assembly Bill 341 – Solid Waste Diversion The Commercial Recycling Requirements mandate that businesses (including public entities) that generate 4 cubic yards or more of commercial solid waste per week and multi-family residential with five units or more arrange for recycling services. Businesses can take one or any combination of the following in order to reuse, recycle, compost, or otherwise divert solid waste from disposal. Additionally, AB 341 mandates that 75 percent of the solid waste generated be reduced, recycled, or composted by 2020. 3.2.6 Regional Emissions Targets – SB 375 SB 375, the 2008 Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act, was signed into law in September 2008 and requires CARB to set regional targets for reducing passenger vehicle GHG emissions in accordance with the Scoping Plan. The purpose of SB 375 is to align regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG reduction targets, and fair- share housing allocations under state housing law. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to adopt a Sustainable Communities Strategy or Alternative Planning Strategy to address GHG reduction targets from cars and light-duty trucks in the context of that MPO’s Regional Transportation Plan. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is the San Diego region’s MPO. The CARB targets for the SANDAG region require a 15 percent reduction in GHG emissions per capita from automobiles and light duty trucks compared to 2005 levels by 2020, and a 19 percent reduction by 2035. 3.2.7 California Building Standards Code (Title 24) The California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24, is referred to as the California Building Code (CBC). It consists of a compilation of several distinct standards and codes related to building construction including, plumbing, electrical, interior acoustics, energy efficiency, handicap accessibility and so on. Of particular relevance to GHG emissions reductions are the CBC’s energy efficiency and green building standards as outlined below. Part 6 – Energy Code The CCR, Title 24, Part 6 is the Energy Efficiency Standards or California Energy Code. This code, originally enacted in 1978, establishes energy-efficiency standards for residential and non-residential buildings in order to reduce California’s energy consumption. The Energy Code is updated periodically to incorporate and consider new energy-efficiency technologies and methodologies as they become available. New construction and major renovations must demonstrate their compliance with the current Energy Code through submission and approval of a Title 24 Compliance Report to the local building permit review authority and the California Energy Commission (CEC). By reducing California’s energy consumption, emissions of statewide GHGs may also be reduced. The current version of the Energy Code, known as the 2019 Energy Code, was adopted on May 9, 2018 and will take effect on January 1, 2020. The 2019 Energy Code includes provisions for smart residential photovoltaic (PV) systems, updated thermal envelope Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 14 standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to exterior and vice versa), residential and non-residential ventilation requirements, and non-residential lighting requirements. The Energy Code aims to reduce energy use in new homes by requiring that all new homes include individual or community solar PV systems or community shared battery storage system that achieves equivalent time-dependent value energy use reduction. Accounting for solar PV requirements, the CEC’s preliminary estimates indicate that homes built consistent under the 2019 Energy Code will result in 53 percent less energy use than those built under the 2016 standards. Part 11 – California Green Building Standards Code The California Green Building Standards Code, referred to as CalGreen, was added to Title 24 as Part 11 first in 2009 as a voluntary code, which then became mandatory effective January 1, 2011 (as part of the 2010 CBC). The 2019 CalGreen institutes mandatory minimum environmental performance standards for all ground-up new construction of non-residential and residential structures. It also includes voluntary tiers (I and II) with stricter environmental performance standards for these same categories of residential and non-residential buildings. Local jurisdictions must enforce the minimum mandatory Green Building Standards and may adopt additional amendments for stricter requirements. The mandatory standards require: • Outdoor water use requirements as outlined in local water efficient landscaping ordinances or current model water efficient landscape ordinance standards, whichever is more stringent; • Requirements for water conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings; • 65 percent construction/demolition waste diverted from landfills; • Infrastructure requirements for electric vehicle charging stations; • Mandatory inspections of energy systems to ensure optimal working efficiency; and • Requirements for low-pollutant emitting exterior and interior finish materials such as paints, carpets, vinyl flooring and particleboards. 3.3 Local 3.3.1 City Climate Action Plan In 2000, the City of Chula Vista became the first municipality in San Diego County to adopt a Climate Action Plan (CAP). The plan, CO2 Reduction Plan, inventoried existing CO2 emissions, projected emissions growth to 2010, and evaluated a wide range of CO2 reduction measures (City of Chula Vista 2000). Measures included in the original Climate Action Plan focus on Transportation Control Measures; land use patterns; clean transportation fuels; and residential, commercial, and industrial building efficiencies. In 2005 the City re-inventoried GHG emissions inventory to evaluate the City’s progress in reaching its emissions goals. Subsequently, the City developed the Climate Mitigation Plans (City of Chula Vista 2008) and Climate Adaptation Plans (City of Chula Vista 2011). Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 15 In September 2017, the City released a new CAP (City of Chula Vista 2017). Whereas previous climate planning documents established a target of 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 consistent with the Original Scoping Plan, the updated CAP reflects new guidance from the 2017 Scoping Plan which recommends that local governments pursue reduction goals of 6 MT CO2E per capita in 2030 and 2 MT CO2E per capita in 2050. As the City began working on climate action planning earlier than other jurisdictions, previous efforts have already reduced communitywide emission to less than 6 MT CO2E per capita. To support the longer-term 2050 goal, the new CAP includes measures that promote energy- and water-efficient buildings, smart growth and clean transit, zero waste policies, and increased local energy generation and water resources. These additional reduction measures are anticipated to result in an additional reduction of 194,950 MT CO2E (or approximately 0.4 MT of per capita reductions). 4.0 Significance Criteria 4.1 State CEQA Guidelines The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Appendix G Environmental Checklist, includes the following two questions regarding assessment of GHG emissions: 1) Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? 2) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of GHGs? As stated in the CEQA Guidelines, these questions are “intended to encourage thoughtful assessment of impacts and do not necessarily represent thresholds of significance” (Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 Guidelines for Implementation of the CEQA, Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form). The GHG emissions of individual projects do not generate sufficient GHG emissions to have a substantial effect on global climate change (South Coast AQMD 2008; San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 2009). However, continued development may contribute to the cumulative global accumulation of GHG emissions that could contribute to an adverse effect to the current climate. In the context of CEQA, “GHG impacts are exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non-cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change perspective” (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association [CAPCOA] 2008). While, the geographic extent of the cumulative contributions to GHGs and climate change is worldwide, relating the contribution of a single project to cumulative global emissions marginalizes project impacts. This makes it difficult to assess the significance of a single project, particularly one designed to accommodate anticipated population growth. When determining appropriate GHG significance thresholds for CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines allow lead agencies to develop their own significance threshold and/or to Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 16 consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts, provided the thresholds are supported by substantial evidence. No GHG emission thresholds have been adopted by the City for land development projects. The San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) is considered the most appropriate agency with special knowledge in the subject area as the City is located within the SDAPCD jurisdiction. However, the SDAPCD has not issued guidance for assessing GHG impacts from land use development projects. Thus, in the absence of a threshold of significance for GHG emissions for the SDAPCD, the project is evaluated based on the recommendation from the next closest air district, the South Coast AQMD. 4.2 Greenhouse Gas Significance Thresholds This analysis follows guidance from the South Coast AQMD’s Interim CEQA GHG Significance Thresholds (South Coast AQMD 2008). South Coast AQMD’s thresholds are a tiered approach; projects may be determined to be less than significant under each tier or require further analysis under subsequent tiers. As identified in the Working Group meeting (Meeting No. 15) in September 2010, the five tiers are: • Tier 1 – The project is exempt from CEQA. • Tier 2 – The project is consistent with an applicable regional GHG emissions reduction plan. • Tier 3 – Project GHG emissions represent an incremental increase below, or mitigated to less than Significance Screening Levels, where: o 3,000 MT CO2E is the Residential/Commercial Screening Level o 10,000 MT CO2E is the Permitted Industrial Screening Level • Tier 4 – The project achieves performance standards, where performance standards may include1: o The project would implement substantial early implementation of measures identified the CARB’s Scoping Plan o The project would achieve sector-based performance standards such as service population efficiency targets where service population includes residential and employment populations provided by a project. • Tier 5 – Offsets along or in combination with the above target Significance Screening Level. Offsets must be provided for a 30-year project life, unless the project life is limited by permit, lease, or other legally binding condition Tier 1 and Tier 2 thresholds are based on planning consistency. This approach, which is referred to in the CEQA Guidelines as “tiering,”allows agencies to rely on programmatic analysis of GHG emissions to determine that subsequent development consistent with the 1 SCAQMD guidance includes an additional performance standard option based on business-as-usual methodology. Business-as-usual methodology is no longer considered best practice. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 17 regional plan would result in incremental GHG emissions contribution that represent a less than significant contribution to cumulative effects. Tier 3 significance screening levels from South Coast AQMD guidance are based on the concept of establishing a 90 percent GHG emission market capture rate. A 90 percent emission capture rate means that 90 percent of total emissions from new development projects would be subject to CEQA analysis and mitigation. The market capture rate of 90 percent was developed to capture a substantial fraction of GHG emissions from new development projects while excluding small projects that will in aggregate contribute a relatively small fraction of the cumulative statewide GHG emissions. This market capture rate approach is based on guidance from the CAPCOA report CEQA & Climate Change, dated January 2008 (CAPCOA 2008). Following rationale presented in the CAPCOA Guidance, the aggregate emissions from all projects with individual annual emissions that are equal to or less than the identified screening levels for 90 percent market capture rate would not impede achievement of the statewide GHG emissions reduction targets. Tier 4 and Tier 5 interim thresholds are intended to demonstrate project consistency with the AB 32 goal of achieving 1990 emission levels by 2020 and the SB 32 goal of reducing GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. 5.0 Emissions Modeling 5.1 Methodology and Assumptions The project’s GHG emissions were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 (CAPCOA 2017). The CalEEMod program is a tool used to estimate air emissions resulting from land development projects based on California-specific emission factors. CalEEMod can be used to calculate emissions from mobile (on-road vehicles), area (fireplaces, consumer products [cleansers, aerosols, and solvents], landscape maintenance equipment, architectural coatings), water and wastewater, and solid waste sources. GHG emissions are estimated in terms of MT CO2E. The analysis methodology and input data are described in the following sections. Where project-specific data was not available, model inputs were based on information provided in the CalEEMod User’s Guide (CAPCOA 2017). 5.1.1 Construction Emissions Construction activities emit GHGs primarily though combustion of fuels (mostly diesel) in the engines of off-road construction equipment and through combustion of diesel and gasoline in on-road construction vehicles and the commute vehicles of the construction workers. Smaller amounts of GHGs are also emitted through the energy use embodied in water use for fugitive dust control. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 18 Every phase of the construction process, including demolition, grading, paving, and building, emits GHGs in volumes directly related to the quantity and type of construction equipment used. GHG emissions associated with each phase of project construction are calculated by multiplying the total fuel consumed by the construction equipment and worker trips by applicable emission factors. The number and pieces of construction equipment are calculated based on the project-specific design. In the absence of project specific construction information, equipment for all phases of construction is estimated based on the size of the land use. Construction emissions are calculated for construction activity based on the construction equipment profile and other factors determined as needed to complete all phases of construction. The project was modeled with construction occurring from July 2021 through December 2022 and with an operational year of 2022. Based on guidance from the SCAQMD, total construction GHG emissions resulting from a project should be amortized over 30 years and added to operational GHG emissions to account for their contribution to GHG emissions over the lifetime of a project (South Coast AQMD 2009). 5.1.2 Mobile Emissions Emissions from vehicles come from the combustion of fossil fuels in vehicle engines. Mobile emissions are estimated in CalEEMod by first calculating trip rate, trip length, trip purpose (e.g., home to work, home to shop, home to other), and trip type percentages for each land use type and quantity. According to the project traffic report, the project would generate 2,400 average daily vehicle trips with an average one-way trip length of 9.6 miles (Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 2020). Default vehicle emission factors for the first operational year of 2022 were used. 5.1.3 Energy Use Emissions Energy use emissions include direct emissions associated with the combustion of on-site fuel sources, such as natural gas, and indirect GHG emissions associated with the generation of electricity from fossil fuels off-site in power plants. Project energy use was estimated based on the size of the proposed land uses using data compiled from South Coast AQMD surveys and incorporated into CalEEMod. These surveys include the California Energy Commission-sponsored California Commercial End Use Survey and Residential Appliance Saturation Survey studies, which identify energy use by building type and climate zone. By default, energy use factors in CalEEMod reflect the 2016 Title 24 energy code (Part 6 of the Building Code). The current version of the energy code, 2019 Title 24, went into effect on January 1, 2020. For non-residential buildings, it is estimated that the 2019 standards is estimated to decrease energy consumption by 30 percent (CEC 2018). The project would be subject to the 2019 Title 24 energy code standards. Thus, in order to account for compliance with the 2019 Title 24 energy code Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 19 standards, a 30 percent reduction in building energy use was included in calculations for the project. The project would be served by San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). Therefore, SDG&E’s specific energy-intensity factors (i.e., the amount of CO2, CH4, and N2O per kilowatt-hour) are used in the calculations of GHG emissions. As discussed in Section 3.2.7, the state mandate for renewable energy is 33 percent by 2020. Based on the most recent annual report, SDG&E has already procured 43 percent (SDG&E 2019). However, the energy- intensity factors included in CalEEMod by default only represent a 10.2 percent procurement of renewable energy (SDG&E 2011). To account for the continuing effects of RPS, the energy-intensity factors included in CalEEMod were adjusted to reflect the current procurement of 43 percent renewable energy. SDG&E energy intensity factors are shown in Table 4. Table 4 San Diego Gas & Electric Intensity Factors GHG 2009 (lbs/MWh) 2020 (lbs/MWh) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 720.49 457.3 Methane (CH4) 0.029 0.018 Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 0.006 0.004 SOURCE: SDG&E 2011. lbs = pounds; MWh = megawatt hour Emissions resulting from natural gas consumption were calculated in CalEEMod by multiplying natural gas consumption by standard emission factors published by the U.S. EPA’s AP-42: Compilation of Air Pollutant Emissions Factors. 5.1.4 Area Source Emissions Area sources include GHG emissions that would occur from the use of landscaping equipment. The use of landscape equipment emits GHGs associated with the equipment’s fuel combustion. Landscaping equipment emission values were derived from the 2011 In-Use Off-Road Equipment Inventory Model (CARB 2011). 5.1.5 Water and Wastewater Emissions The amount of water used and wastewater generated by a project has indirect GHG emissions associated with it. These emissions are a result of the energy used to supply, distribute, and treat the water and wastewater. In addition to the indirect GHG emissions associated with energy use, wastewater treatment can directly emit both CH4 and N2O. The indoor and outdoor water use consumption data for each land use subtype comes from the Pacific Institute’s Waste Not, Want Not: The Potential for Urban Water Conservation in California 2003 (as cited in CAPCOA 2017). Based on that report, a percentage of total water consumption was dedicated to landscape irrigation, which is used to determine Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 20 outdoor water use. Wastewater generation was similarly based on a reported percentage of total indoor water use (CAPCOA 2017). The project would be subject to CalGreen, which requires a 20 percent increase in indoor water use efficiency. Thus, in order to demonstrate compliance with CalGreen, a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use was included in the water consumption calculations for the project. In addition to water reductions under CalGreen, the GHG emissions from the energy used to transport the water are affected by RPS. As discussed previously, to account for the effects of RPS through 2020, the energy-intensity factors included in CalEEMod were adjusted to reflect 43 percent renewable energy (see Table 4). 5.1.6 Solid Waste Emissions The disposal of solid waste produces GHG emissions from anaerobic decomposition in landfills, incineration, and transportation of waste. To calculate the GHG emissions generated by disposing of solid waste for the project, the total volume of solid waste was calculated using waste disposal rates identified by California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). The methods for quantifying GHG emissions from solid waste are based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change method, using the degradable organic content of waste. GHG emissions associated with the project’s waste disposal were calculated using these parameters. These CalRecycle waste generation estimates do not reflect increased waste diversion achieved through compliance with AB 341, Commercial Recycling Requirements. According to a CalRecycle report to the Legislature, as of 2013 California has achieved a statewide 50 percent diversion of solid waste from landfills through “reduce/recycle/compost” programs (CalRecycle 2015). AB 341 mandates that 75 percent of the solid waste generated be reduced, recycled, or composted by 2020. Therefore, compliance with AB 341 requirements would increase solid waste diversion by an additional 25 percent and thereby reduce solid waste disposal by 50 percent. 5.1.7 Emergency Generator Testing The project would install and operate an 800 kilowatt (kW) Caterpillar C27 Generator Set emergency generator (specifications are included as Attachment 2). As discussed in the operation and maintenance manual, the service life and field reliability of the emergency generator is largely dependent on regular maintenance. Maintenance may include run- tests. Emissions due to testing were calculated using the default emission factors from CalEEMod assuming testing involves operation at full load for up to 50 total hours per year. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 21 6.0 GHG Impact Analysis 6.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Based on the methodology summarized in Section 5.1, the direct and indirect GHG emissions have been calculated. Table 5 summarizes the results. The complete model outputs for the project are included in Attachment 2. Table 5 Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimate (MT CO2E per Year) Emission Source Project Emissions Mobile 2,312 Energy Use Electricity Natural Gas 506 284 222 Area sources <1 Generator Maintenance 21 Water use 40 Solid waste disposal 88 Construction1 36 TOTAL2 2,986 MT CO2E = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent 1 Construction emissions were amortized over a 30-year period. 2 Total may vary due to independent rounding. Project construction and operation would result in the annual equivalent of 2,986 MT CO2E. This emission level would not exceed the 3,000 MT CO2E Residential/Commercial Screening Level. As project emissions would be less than the applicable screening level, GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. 6.2 Applicable Plans, Policies, and Regulations Intended to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions 6.2.1 State Scoping Plan – Regulatory Programs As discussed in Section 3.2, State Climate Change Regulations, EO S-3-05 established statewide GHG emission reduction targets for the state, and AB 32 launched the CARB Climate Change Scoping Plan that outlined the reduction measures needed to reach the 2020 target. As discussed above, project emissions would be below the Residential/Commercial Screening Level. As discussed in Section 4.2, significance screening levels from South Coast AQMD guidance are based on the concept of establishing a 90 percent GHG emission market capture rate. The 3,000 MT CO2E Residential/Commercial Screening Level would specifically apply to Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 22 GHG emissions from new development projects for residential/commercial sectors. Following rationale presented in the CAPCOA Guidance, the aggregate emissions from all projects with individual annual emissions that are equal to or less than the identified screening levels for 90 percent market capture rate would not impede achievement of the statewide GHG emissions reduction targets. Project construction and operation would not exceed the 3,000 MT CO2E Residential/Commercial Screening Level. Therefore, the project would not conflict with plans to achieve statewide GHG emissions reduction targets established by AB 32 or SB 32. 6.2.2 City Climate Action Plan As discussed in Section 3.3.1, the City updated its CAP in 2017. The updated focus of the new CAP promoted energy- and water-efficient buildings, smart growth and clean transit, zero waste policies, and increased local energy generation and water resources. Table 6 summarizes reduction strategies from the CAP and evaluates project consistency with each strategy. As shown in Table 6, CAP reduction strategies would be implemented directly by the City and therefore are not applicable to individual development projects. The project would be consistent with all applicable CAP reduction strategies; therefore the project would not conflict with the CAP and impacts would be less than significant. Table 6 Climate Action Plan Consistency Analysis Category Reduction Strategy Project Consistency Water Conservation & Reuse Water Education and Enforcement Expand education and enforcement targeting landscape water waste. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to expand education or enforcement targeting landscaping water waste. Water Efficiency Upgrades Update the City’s Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance to promote more water-wise landscaping designs. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to update the City’s Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance. Require water-saving retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to require water-saving retrofits in existing buildings. Water Reuse Plan & System Installations Develop a Water Reuse Master Plan to maximize the use of storm water, graywater, and onsite water reclamation. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to develop a Water Reuse Master Plan. Streamline complex graywater system’s permit review. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to streamline permit review for graywater systems. Waste Reduction Zero Waste Plan Develop a Zero Waste Plan to supplement statewide green waste, recycling, and plastic bag ban efforts. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to develop a Zero Waste Plan. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 23 Table 6 Climate Action Plan Consistency Analysis Category Reduction Strategy Project Consistency Renewable & Energy Efficient Energy Education & Enforcement Expand education targeting key community segments and facilitating energy performance disclosure. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to expand energy education and performance disclosure. Leverage the building inspection process to distribute energy-related information and to deter unpermitted, low performing energy improvements. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to distribute energy-related information. Clean Energy Sources Incorporate Solar Photovoltaic into all new residential and commercial buildings. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to adopt pre-wiring standards or to develop a solar photovoltaic requirement. Provide more grid-delivered clean energy through Community Choice Aggregation or other mechanism. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to provide grid-delivered clean energy. Energy Efficiency Upgrades Expand the City’s “cool roof” standards to include re-roofs and western areas. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to revise the City’s “cool roof” standards. Facilitate more energy upgrades in the community through incentives, permit streamlining and education. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to facilitate energy upgrades in the community. Require energy-savings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to require energy-savings retrofits in existing buildings. Robust Urban Forests Plant more shade trees to save energy, address heat island issues, and improve air quality. Consistent. The project Landscape Plan includes 41 patio shade trees throughout the patio areas and along pathways, 90 shade trees surrounding and throughout the parking lot, and 76 perimeter screen trees. Smart Growth & Transportation Complete Streets & Neighborhoods Incorporate “Complete Streets” principles into municipal capital projects and plans. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to improve municipal capital projects and plans. Encourage higher density and mixed-use development in Smart Growth areas, especially around trolley stations and other transit nodes. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to construct additional high density and mixed-use development in Smart Growth areas. Transportation Demand Management Utilize bike facilities, transit access/passes and other Transportation Demand Management and congestion management offerings. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to develop Transportation Demand Management and congestion management offerings. Expand bike-sharing, car-sharing, and other “last mile” transportation options. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to develop Transportation Demand Management and congestion management offerings. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 24 Table 6 Climate Action Plan Consistency Analysis Category Reduction Strategy Project Consistency Alternative Fuel Vehicle Readiness Support the installation of more local alternative fueling stations. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to install more local alternative fueling stations. Designate preferred parking for alternative fuel vehicles. Not applicable. The project would not impede efforts to designate preferred parking for alternative fuel vehicles. Design all new residential and commercial buildings to be “Electric Vehicle Ready.” Consistent. The project would comply with 2019 CalGreen requirements for provision of electric vehicle charging equipment. Source: City Climate Action Plan 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The project’s potential to result in impacts to climate change was assessed using criteria from the State CEQA Guidelines and the SCAQMD’s Interim CEQA GHG Significance Thresholds. For determining the significance of GHG emissions, the project was evaluated against a 3,000 MT CO2E Residential/Commercial Screening Level. Project GHG emissions would not exceed the 3,000 MT CO2E Residential/Commercial Screening Level. As project emissions would be less than the applicable screening level, GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. As discussed in Section 6.2.1, significance screening levels from South Coast AQMD guidance are based on the concept of establishing a 90 percent GHG emission market capture rate. The aggregate emissions from all projects with individual annual emissions that are equal to or less than screening levels would not impede achievement of the state GHG emissions reduction targets. Therefore, the project would not conflict with plans to achieve statewide GHG emissions reduction targets established by AB 32 or SB 32. Additionally, as summarized in Table 6, the project would be consistent with all applicable reduction strategies from the City CAP. Therefore the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission and impacts would be less than significant. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 25 8.0 References Cited California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) 2008 CEQA & Climate Change, Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act, January. 2017 California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). User’s Guide Version 2016.3.2 September. California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2007 Staff Report, California 1990 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Level and 2020 Limit, Appendix A – 1990 Inventory by IPCC Category. Last updated November 19, 2007. Accessed April, 2014. 2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change. Accessed at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/adopted_scoping_plan.pdf. December. 2011 In-Use Off-Road Equipment (Construction, Industrial, Ground Support, and Oil Drilling) 2011 Inventory Model. 2017 The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, The Strategy for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target, Draft. October 27, 2017. 2019 California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000–2017 - by Category as Defined in the 2008 Scoping Plan. Last updated August 12, 2019. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) 2015 AB 341 Report to the Legislature. Publication #DRRR-2015-1538. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/Publications/Download/1168. California Energy Commission (CEC) 2018 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards Frequently Asked Questions. March. Accessed at https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-03 /Title_24 _2019_ Building_Standards_FAQ_ada.pdf Chula Vista, City of 2000 Chula Vista CO2 Reduction Plan. Adopted November 14, 2000. 2008 Climate Change Working Group Measures Implementation Plan. July 2008. 2011 Climate Adaptation Strategies Implementation Plans. May 2011. 2014 2012 Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project Page 26 2017 Chula Vista Climate Action Plan. Adopted September 2017. 2018 2014 Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory. Adopted September 2018. 2020a 2016 GHG Emissions Community Inventory Report. Adopted March 2020. 2020b 2016 GHG Emissions Municipal Inventory Report. Adopted March 2020. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2014 Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) 2020 Transportation Impact Analysis, Acadia Hospital. June 16, 2020. San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) 2011 March 2011 Semi-Annual Compliance Report Pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard. Filed March. 2019 2018 Power Content Label. July 2019. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 2009 Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects under CEQA. December 17. South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) 2008 Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold. October 2008. 2009 Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group 14. November 19, 2009. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) 2010 Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2008. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Program, Office of Atmospheric Programs. 430-R-10- 006. April 15. 2020a Energy Star. http://www.energystar.gov Accessed June 17, 2020. 2020b U.S. EPA State and Local Climate and Energy Program. http://www.epa.gov/ statelocalclimate/index.html. Accessed June 17, 2020. Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project ATTACHMENTS Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project ATTACHMENT 1 Emergency Generator Specifications Caterpillar is leading the power generation marketplace with Power Solutions engineered to deliver unmatched flexibility, expandability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. Specifications Generator Set Specifications Minimum Rating 680 ekW Maximum Rating 800 ekW Voltage 208 to 600 Frequency 60 Hz Speed 1800 RPM Generator Set Configurations Emissions/Fuel Strategy Low Fuel Consumption, U.S. EPA Certified for Stationary Emergency Use Only (Tier 2 Nonroad Equivalent Emission Standards) Engine Specifications Engine Model C27 ATAAC, V-12, 4-Stroke, Water-Cooled Diesel Bore 137.2 mm 5.4 in Displacement 27.03 L 1649.47 in³ Stroke 152.4 mm 6 in Compression Ratio 16.5:1 Aspiration TA Governor Type Adem™A4 Fuel System MEUI Benefits and Features Cat Diesel Engine Reliable, rugged, durable design Field-proven in thousands of applications worldwide Four-stroke-cycle diesel engine combines consistent performance and excellent fuel economy with minimum weight Page: M-1 of M-4© 2016 Caterpillar All Rights ReservedMSS-EPG-18331497-015.pdf C27 Generator Set Electric Power SS-7399947-18331497-025 SS Page 1 of 7 Generator Matched to the performance and output characteristics of Cat engines Industry leading mechanical and electrical design Industry leading motor starting capabilities High Efficiency Cat EMCP Control Panel The EMCP controller features the reliability and durability you have come to expect from your Cat equipment. EMCP4 is a scalable control platform designed to ensure reliable generator set operation, providing extensive information about power output and engine operation. EMCP4 systems can be further customized to meet your needs through programming and expansion modules. Seismic Certification Seismic Certification available. Anchoring details are site specific, and are dependent on many factors such as generator set size, weight, and concrete strength. IBC Certification requires that the anchoring system used is reviewed and approved by a Professional Engineer Seismic Certification per Applicable Building Codes: IBC 2000, IBC 2003, IBC 2006, IBC 2009, CBC 2007, CBC 2010 Pre-approved by OSHPD and carries an OSP-0321-10 for use in healthcare projects in California Design Criteria The generator set accepts 100% rated load in one step per NFPA 110 and meets ISO 8528-5 transient response. UL 2200 / CSA - Optional UL 2200 listed packages CSA Certified Certain restrictions may apply. Consult with your Cat® Dealer. Single-Source Supplier Fully prototype tested with certified torsional vibration analysis available World Wide Product Support Cat dealers provide extensive post-sale support including maintenance and repair agreements. Cat dealers have RYHUGHDOHUEUDQFKVWRUHVRSHUDWLQJLQFRXQWULHV7KH&DWHUSLOODU6ವ2ವ6യSURJUDPFRVWHIIHFWLYHO\ detects internal engine component condition, even the presence of unwanted fluids and combustion by-products Standard Equipment Air Inlet • Air Cleaner Cooling • Package mounted radiator Exhaust • Exhaust flange outlet Fuel • Primary fuel filter with integral water separator • Secondary fuel filter Page: M-2 of M-4© 2016 Caterpillar All Rights ReservedMSS-EPG-18331497-015.pdf C27 Generator Set Electric Power SS-7399947-18331497-025 SS Page 2 of 7 • Fuel priming pump Generator • Matched to the performance and output characteristics of Cat engines • Load adjustment module provides engine relief upon load impact and improves load acceptance and recovery time • IP23 Protection Power Termination • Bus Bar Control Panel • EMCP 4 Genset Controller General • Paint - Caterpillar Yellow except rails and radiators gloss black Optional Equipment Exhaust • Exhaust mufflers Generator • Anti-condensation heater • Excitation: [ ] Permanent Magnet Excited (PM) [ ] Internally Excited (IE) • Oversize and premium generators Power Termination • Circuit breakers, UL listed • Circuit breakers, IEC compliant Control Panels • EMCP (4.2) (4.3) (4.4) • Generator temperature monitoring & protection • Load share module • Digital I/O module • Remote monitoring software Mounting • Rubber anti-vibration mounts • Spring-type vibration isolator • IBC isolators Starting/Charging • Battery chargers • Oversize batteries • Jacket water heater • Heavy-duty starting system Page: M-3 of M-4© 2016 Caterpillar All Rights ReservedMSS-EPG-18331497-015.pdf C27 Generator Set Electric Power SS-7399947-18331497-025 SS Page 3 of 7 • Charging alternator • Air starting motor with control and silencer General • The following options are based on regional and product configuration: • Seismic Certification per applicable building codes: IBC 2000, IBC 2003, IBC 2006, IBC 2009, CBC 2007 • UL 2200 package • EU Certificate of Conformance (CE) • CSA Certification • EEC Declaration of Conformity • Enclosures: sound attenuated, weather protective • Automatic transfer switches (ATS) • Integral & sub-base fuel tanks • Integral & sub-base UL listed dual wall fuel tanks The International System of Units (SI) is used in this publication. CAT, CATERPILLAR, their respective logos, ADEM, EUI, S•O•S, "Caterpillar Yellow" and the "Power Edge" trade dress, as well as corporate and product identity used herein, are trademarks of Caterpillar and may not be used without permission. Page: M-4 of M-4© 2016 Caterpillar All Rights ReservedMSS-EPG-18331497-015.pdf C27 Generator Set Electric Power SS-7399947-18331497-025 SS Page 4 of 7 C27 ACERT 800 ekW/ 1000 kVA 60 Hz/ 1800 rpm/ 480 V Image shown may not reflect actual configuration Metric English Package Performance Genset Power Rating with Fan @ 0.8 Power Factor 800 ekW Genset Power Rating 1000 kVA Aftercooler (Separate Circuit)N/A N/A Fuel Consumption 100% Load with Fan 213.3 L/hr 56.3 gal/hr 75% Load with Fan 164.6 L/hr 43.5 gal/hr 50% Load with Fan 117.3 L/hr 31.0 gal/hr 25% Load with Fan 72.0 L/hr 19.0 gal/hr Cooling System¹ Engine Coolant Capacity 55.0 L 14.5 gal Inlet Air Combustion Air Inlet Flow Rate 58.2 m³/min 2055.3 cfm Max. Allowable Combustion Air Inlet Temp 48 ° C 119 ° F Exhaust System Exhaust Stack Gas Temperature 523.6 ° C 974.4 ° F Exhaust Gas Flow Rate 160.3 m³/min 5661.7 cfm Exhaust System Backpressure (Maximum Allowable)6.7 kPa 27.0 in. water TSS-DM9068-01-GS-EPG-7399947.pdf © 2016 Caterpillar All Rights Reserved Page 1 of 3 ELECTRIC POWER - Technical Spec Sheet 800 ekW/ 1000 kVA/ 60 Hz/ 1800 rpm/ 480 V/ 0.8 Power Factor Rating Type: STANDBY Fuel Strategy: LOW FUEL CONSUMPTION STANDARD C27 ACERT SS-7399947-18331497-025 SS Page 5 of 7 DEFINITIONS AND CONDITIONS 1. For ambient and altitude capabilities consult your Cat dealer. Air flow restriction (system) is added to existing restriction from factory. 2. UL 2200 Listed packages may have oversized generators with a different temperature rise and motor starting characteristics. Generator temperature rise is based on a 40° C ambient per NEMA MG1-32. 3. Emissions data measurement procedures are consistent with those described in EPA CFR 40 Part 89, Subpart D & E and ISO8178-1 for measuring HC, CO, PM, NOx. Data shown is based on steady state operating conditions of 77° F, 28.42 in HG and number 2 diesel fuel with 35° API and LHV of 18,390 btu/lb. The nominal emissions data shown is subject to instrumentation, measurement, facility and engine to engine variations. Emissions data is based on 100% load and thus cannot be used to compare to EPA regulations which use values based on a weighted cycle. Heat Rejection Heat Rejection to Jacket Water 350 kW 19909 Btu/min Heat Rejection to Exhaust (Total)765 kW 43510 Btu/min Heat Rejection to Aftercooler 140 kW 7966 Btu/min Heat Rejection to Atmosphere from Engine 105 kW 5950 Btu/min Heat Rejection to Atmosphere from Generator 57 kW 3213 Btu/min Alternator² Motor Starting Capability @ 30% Voltage Dip 2117 skVA Current 1203 amps Frame Size 1296 Excitation PM Temperature Rise 150 ° C Emissions (Nominal)³ NOx 3371.2 mg/Nm³6.2 g/hp-hr CO 137.1 mg/Nm³0.3 g/hp-hr HC 7.7 mg/Nm³0.0 g/hp-hr PM 5.0 mg/Nm³0.0 g/hp-hr TSS-DM9068-01-GS-EPG-7399947.pdf © 2016 Caterpillar All Rights Reserved Page 2 of 3 ELECTRIC POWER - Technical Spec Sheet 800 ekW/ 1000 kVA/ 60 Hz/ 1800 rpm/ 480 V/ 0.8 Power Factor Rating Type: STANDBY Fuel Strategy: LOW FUEL CONSUMPTION STANDARD C27 ACERT SS-7399947-18331497-025 SS Page 6 of 7 Applicable Codes and Standards: AS1359, CSA C22.2 No100-04, UL142,UL489, UL869, UL2200, NFPA37, NFPA70, NFPA99, NFPA110, IBC, IEC60034-1, ISO3046, ISO8528, NEMA MG1-22,NEMA MG1-33, 2006/95/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2004/108/EC. Note: Codes may not be available in all model configurations. Please consult your local Cat Dealer representative for availability. Ratings are based on SAE J1349 standard conditions. These ratings also apply at ISO3046 standard conditions Fuel Rates are based on fuel oil of 35º API [16º C (60º F)] gravity having an LHV of 42 780 kJ/kg (18,390 Btu/lb) when used at 29º C (85º F) and weighing 838.9 g/liter (7.001 lbs/U.S. gal.). Additional ratings may be available for specific customer requirements, contact your Cat representative for details. For information regarding Low Sulfur fuel and Biodiesel capability, please consult your Cat dealer. www.Cat-ElectricPower.com STANDBY:Output available with varying load for the duration of the interruption of the normal source power. Average power output is 70% of the standby power rating. Typical operation is 200 hours per year, with maximum expected usage of 500 hours per year. The International System of Units (SI) is used in this publication. CAT, CATERPILLAR, their respective logos, ADEM, EUI, S•O•S, "Caterpillar Yellow" and the "Power Edge" trade dress, as well as corporate and product identity used herein, are trademarks of Caterpillar and may not be used without permission. Performance No.: DM9068-01 Feature Code: C27DR67 Generator Arrangement: 3850654 Source Country: U.S. Date: 09/03/2016 TSS-DM9068-01-GS-EPG-7399947.pdf © 2016 Caterpillar All Rights Reserved Page 3 of 3 ELECTRIC POWER - Technical Spec Sheet 800 ekW/ 1000 kVA/ 60 Hz/ 1800 rpm/ 480 V/ 0.8 Power Factor Rating Type: STANDBY Fuel Strategy: LOW FUEL CONSUMPTION STANDARD C27 ACERT SS-7399947-18331497-025 SS Page 7 of 7 Greenhouse Gas Analysis Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital Project ATTACHMENT 2 CalEEMod Output Files 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Hospital 120.00 Bed 6.82 97,050.00 0 Parking Lot 3.60 Acre 3.60 156,816.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 13 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 40 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric 2022Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 457.3 0.018CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 1 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual Project Characteristics - Energy intensity factors updated based on SDG&E renewable procurement (457.3, 0.018, 0.004) Land Use - 10.42 acres Construction Phase - Architectural coatings simultaneous with last half of building construction Trips and VMT - Grading - Architectural Coating - SDAPCD Rule 67.0.1 Vehicle Trips - 20 trips/bed 9.6 mile trip length Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Area Coating - SDAPCD Rule 67.0.1 Energy Use - Reduced by 30 percent for account for 2019 Energy Code. (6.37 > 4.46; 4.52 > 3.16; 51.05 > 35.74) Water And Wastewater - CalGreen requires 20% decrease in indoor water use that is not included in model (8,622,109.95 gallons) Solid Waste - Default Rate (350.4 tons/yr/bed) reduced 50%. Energy Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 150.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 250.00 100.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 150 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 100 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 250 100 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 150.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 2 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 60.00 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 4.52 3.16 tblEnergyUse T24E 6.37 4.46 tblEnergyUse T24NG 51.05 35.74 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 150.00 75.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 51,000.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 85,890.91 97,050.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.97 6.82 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.018 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 457.3 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.004 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 350.40 175.20 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse HorsePowerValue 0.00 1,073.00 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse HoursPerDay 0.00 0.50 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse HoursPerYear 0.00 50.00 tblStationaryGeneratorsPumpsUse NumberOfEquipment 0.00 1.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 9.60 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 9.60 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 9.60 tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.14 12.58 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 7.19 11.11 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 12.94 20.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 10,777,637.44 8,622,109.95 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 3 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 0.2627 3.2399 2.0296 6.2000e- 003 0.4084 0.1093 0.5177 0.1795 0.1013 0.2807 0.0000 575.7892 575.7892 0.1073 0.0000 578.4714 2022 0.8033 2.4783 2.5137 5.7200e- 003 0.1372 0.1041 0.2412 0.0372 0.0983 0.1355 0.0000 511.8464 511.8464 0.0791 0.0000 513.8236 Maximum 0.8033 3.2399 2.5137 6.2000e- 003 0.4084 0.1093 0.5177 0.1795 0.1013 0.2807 0.0000 575.7892 575.7892 0.1073 0.0000 578.4714 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 0.2627 3.2399 2.0296 6.2000e- 003 0.4084 0.1093 0.5177 0.1795 0.1013 0.2807 0.0000 575.7889 575.7889 0.1073 0.0000 578.4711 2022 0.8033 2.4783 2.5137 5.7200e- 003 0.1372 0.1041 0.2412 0.0372 0.0983 0.1355 0.0000 511.8460 511.8460 0.0791 0.0000 513.8233 Maximum 0.8033 3.2399 2.5137 6.2000e- 003 0.4084 0.1093 0.5177 0.1795 0.1013 0.2807 0.0000 575.7889 575.7889 0.1073 0.0000 578.4711 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 4 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 2 4-4-2021 7-3-2021 0.0477 0.0477 3 7-4-2021 10-3-2021 2.4526 2.4526 4 10-4-2021 1-3-2022 1.0038 1.0038 5 1-4-2022 4-3-2022 0.7089 0.7089 6 4-4-2022 7-3-2022 0.9025 0.9025 7 7-4-2022 9-30-2022 0.9774 0.9774 Highest 2.4526 2.4526 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 5 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.4421 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2100e- 003 2.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.3500e- 003 Energy 0.0223 0.2030 0.1705 1.2200e- 003 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 503.8845 503.8845 0.0154 6.5300e- 003 506.2134 Mobile 0.5968 2.6582 7.1356 0.0250 2.2135 0.0210 2.2344 0.5927 0.0196 0.6123 0.0000 2,309.145 2 2,309.145 2 0.1204 0.0000 2,312.153 9 Stationary 0.0440 0.1969 0.1123 2.1000e- 004 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.4298 20.4298 2.8600e- 003 0.0000 20.5014 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 35.5640 0.0000 35.5640 2.1018 0.0000 88.1084 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.7354 28.0185 30.7539 0.2821 6.8800e- 003 39.8552 Total 1.1052 3.0580 7.4194 0.0265 2.2135 0.0429 2.2563 0.5927 0.0415 0.6342 38.2994 2,861.480 2 2,899.779 6 2.5224 0.0134 2,966.834 6 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 6 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.4421 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2100e- 003 2.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.3500e- 003 Energy 0.0223 0.2030 0.1705 1.2200e- 003 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 503.8845 503.8845 0.0154 6.5300e- 003 506.2134 Mobile 0.5968 2.6582 7.1356 0.0250 2.2135 0.0210 2.2344 0.5927 0.0196 0.6123 0.0000 2,309.145 2 2,309.145 2 0.1204 0.0000 2,312.153 9 Stationary 0.0440 0.1969 0.1123 2.1000e- 004 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.4298 20.4298 2.8600e- 003 0.0000 20.5014 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 35.5640 0.0000 35.5640 2.1018 0.0000 88.1084 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.7354 28.0185 30.7539 0.2821 6.8800e- 003 39.8552 Total 1.1052 3.0580 7.4194 0.0265 2.2135 0.0429 2.2563 0.5927 0.0415 0.6342 38.2994 2,861.480 2 2,899.779 6 2.5224 0.0134 2,966.834 6 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 7 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/1/2021 7/14/2021 5 10 2 Grading Grading 7/15/2021 10/6/2021 5 60 3 Building Construction Building Construction 10/7/2021 11/30/2022 5 300 4 Paving Paving 12/1/2021 12/28/2021 5 20 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/5/2022 11/30/2022 5 150 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 145,575; Non-Residential Outdoor: 48,525; Striped Parking Area: 9,409 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 75 Acres of Paving: 3.6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 8 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 6,375.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 97.00 42.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 19.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 9 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.2 Site Preparation - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0903 0.0000 0.0903 0.0497 0.0000 0.0497 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0194 0.2025 0.1058 1.9000e- 004 0.0102 0.0102 9.4000e- 003 9.4000e- 003 0.0000 16.7179 16.7179 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 16.8530 Total 0.0194 0.2025 0.1058 1.9000e- 004 0.0903 0.0102 0.1006 0.0497 9.4000e- 003 0.0591 0.0000 16.7179 16.7179 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 16.8530 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.6305 0.6305 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6309 Total 3.1000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.6305 0.6305 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6309 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 10 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.2 Site Preparation - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0903 0.0000 0.0903 0.0497 0.0000 0.0497 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0194 0.2025 0.1058 1.9000e- 004 0.0102 0.0102 9.4000e- 003 9.4000e- 003 0.0000 16.7178 16.7178 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 16.8530 Total 0.0194 0.2025 0.1058 1.9000e- 004 0.0903 0.0102 0.1006 0.0497 9.4000e- 003 0.0591 0.0000 16.7178 16.7178 5.4100e- 003 0.0000 16.8530 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.6305 0.6305 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6309 Total 3.1000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.6305 0.6305 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6309 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 11 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.2240 0.0000 0.2240 0.1041 0.0000 0.1041 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1257 1.3920 0.9264 1.8600e- 003 0.0596 0.0596 0.0548 0.0548 0.0000 163.4849 163.4849 0.0529 0.0000 164.8068 Total 0.1257 1.3920 0.9264 1.8600e- 003 0.2240 0.0596 0.2836 0.1041 0.0548 0.1589 0.0000 163.4849 163.4849 0.0529 0.0000 164.8068 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0239 0.8325 0.2053 2.4400e- 003 0.0545 2.5200e- 003 0.0571 0.0150 2.4100e- 003 0.0174 0.0000 242.7668 242.7668 0.0219 0.0000 243.3145 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 0.0150 5.0000e- 005 4.8100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.8500e- 003 1.2800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 0.0000 4.2031 4.2031 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.2062 Total 0.0260 0.8340 0.2203 2.4900e- 003 0.0594 2.5500e- 003 0.0619 0.0163 2.4400e- 003 0.0187 0.0000 246.9699 246.9699 0.0220 0.0000 247.5207 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 12 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.2240 0.0000 0.2240 0.1041 0.0000 0.1041 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1257 1.3920 0.9264 1.8600e- 003 0.0596 0.0596 0.0548 0.0548 0.0000 163.4848 163.4848 0.0529 0.0000 164.8066 Total 0.1257 1.3920 0.9264 1.8600e- 003 0.2240 0.0596 0.2836 0.1041 0.0548 0.1589 0.0000 163.4848 163.4848 0.0529 0.0000 164.8066 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0239 0.8325 0.2053 2.4400e- 003 0.0545 2.5200e- 003 0.0571 0.0150 2.4100e- 003 0.0174 0.0000 242.7668 242.7668 0.0219 0.0000 243.3145 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0900e- 003 1.4900e- 003 0.0150 5.0000e- 005 4.8100e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.8500e- 003 1.2800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 0.0000 4.2031 4.2031 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.2062 Total 0.0260 0.8340 0.2203 2.4900e- 003 0.0594 2.5500e- 003 0.0619 0.0163 2.4400e- 003 0.0187 0.0000 246.9699 246.9699 0.0220 0.0000 247.5207 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 13 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0589 0.5404 0.5138 8.3000e- 004 0.0297 0.0297 0.0279 0.0279 0.0000 71.8076 71.8076 0.0173 0.0000 72.2407 Total 0.0589 0.5404 0.5138 8.3000e- 004 0.0297 0.0297 0.0279 0.0279 0.0000 71.8076 71.8076 0.0173 0.0000 72.2407 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0300e- 003 0.1338 0.0357 3.5000e- 004 8.6400e- 003 2.8000e- 004 8.9300e- 003 2.5000e- 003 2.7000e- 004 2.7700e- 003 0.0000 34.0395 34.0395 2.5300e- 003 0.0000 34.1027 Worker 0.0105 7.4600e- 003 0.0751 2.3000e- 004 0.0241 1.7000e- 004 0.0243 6.4100e- 003 1.6000e- 004 6.5600e- 003 0.0000 21.0647 21.0647 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 21.0798 Total 0.0145 0.1413 0.1108 5.8000e- 004 0.0328 4.5000e- 004 0.0332 8.9100e- 003 4.3000e- 004 9.3300e- 003 0.0000 55.1042 55.1042 3.1300e- 003 0.0000 55.1825 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 14 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0589 0.5404 0.5138 8.3000e- 004 0.0297 0.0297 0.0279 0.0279 0.0000 71.8075 71.8075 0.0173 0.0000 72.2406 Total 0.0589 0.5404 0.5138 8.3000e- 004 0.0297 0.0297 0.0279 0.0279 0.0000 71.8075 71.8075 0.0173 0.0000 72.2406 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0300e- 003 0.1338 0.0357 3.5000e- 004 8.6400e- 003 2.8000e- 004 8.9300e- 003 2.5000e- 003 2.7000e- 004 2.7700e- 003 0.0000 34.0395 34.0395 2.5300e- 003 0.0000 34.1027 Worker 0.0105 7.4600e- 003 0.0751 2.3000e- 004 0.0241 1.7000e- 004 0.0243 6.4100e- 003 1.6000e- 004 6.5600e- 003 0.0000 21.0647 21.0647 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 21.0798 Total 0.0145 0.1413 0.1108 5.8000e- 004 0.0328 4.5000e- 004 0.0332 8.9100e- 003 4.3000e- 004 9.3300e- 003 0.0000 55.1042 55.1042 3.1300e- 003 0.0000 55.1825 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 15 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2030 1.8583 1.9472 3.2100e- 003 0.0963 0.0963 0.0906 0.0906 0.0000 275.7530 275.7530 0.0661 0.0000 277.4046 Total 0.2030 1.8583 1.9472 3.2100e- 003 0.0963 0.0963 0.0906 0.0906 0.0000 275.7530 275.7530 0.0661 0.0000 277.4046 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0144 0.4850 0.1297 1.3200e- 003 0.0332 9.4000e- 004 0.0341 9.5800e- 003 8.9000e- 004 0.0105 0.0000 129.4303 129.4303 9.3900e- 003 0.0000 129.6652 Worker 0.0380 0.0261 0.2677 8.6000e- 004 0.0926 6.4000e- 004 0.0932 0.0246 5.9000e- 004 0.0252 0.0000 77.8971 77.8971 2.1200e- 003 0.0000 77.9502 Total 0.0523 0.5111 0.3974 2.1800e- 003 0.1257 1.5800e- 003 0.1273 0.0342 1.4800e- 003 0.0357 0.0000 207.3274 207.3274 0.0115 0.0000 207.6154 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 16 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2030 1.8583 1.9472 3.2100e- 003 0.0963 0.0963 0.0906 0.0906 0.0000 275.7527 275.7527 0.0661 0.0000 277.4043 Total 0.2030 1.8583 1.9472 3.2100e- 003 0.0963 0.0963 0.0906 0.0906 0.0000 275.7527 275.7527 0.0661 0.0000 277.4043 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0144 0.4850 0.1297 1.3200e- 003 0.0332 9.4000e- 004 0.0341 9.5800e- 003 8.9000e- 004 0.0105 0.0000 129.4303 129.4303 9.3900e- 003 0.0000 129.6652 Worker 0.0380 0.0261 0.2677 8.6000e- 004 0.0926 6.4000e- 004 0.0932 0.0246 5.9000e- 004 0.0252 0.0000 77.8971 77.8971 2.1200e- 003 0.0000 77.9502 Total 0.0523 0.5111 0.3974 2.1800e- 003 0.1257 1.5800e- 003 0.1273 0.0342 1.4800e- 003 0.0357 0.0000 207.3274 207.3274 0.0115 0.0000 207.6154 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 17 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0126 0.1292 0.1465 2.3000e- 004 6.7800e- 003 6.7800e- 003 6.2400e- 003 6.2400e- 003 0.0000 20.0235 20.0235 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1854 Paving 4.7200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0173 0.1292 0.1465 2.3000e- 004 6.7800e- 003 6.7800e- 003 6.2400e- 003 6.2400e- 003 0.0000 20.0235 20.0235 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1854 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2100e- 003 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.0508 1.0508 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0515 Total 5.2000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2100e- 003 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.0508 1.0508 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0515 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 18 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0126 0.1292 0.1465 2.3000e- 004 6.7800e- 003 6.7800e- 003 6.2400e- 003 6.2400e- 003 0.0000 20.0235 20.0235 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1854 Paving 4.7200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0173 0.1292 0.1465 2.3000e- 004 6.7800e- 003 6.7800e- 003 6.2400e- 003 6.2400e- 003 0.0000 20.0235 20.0235 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1854 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2100e- 003 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.0508 1.0508 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0515 Total 5.2000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2100e- 003 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.0508 1.0508 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0515 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 19 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.5279 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0153 0.1056 0.1360 2.2000e- 004 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 0.0000 19.1494 19.1494 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 19.1806 Total 0.5432 0.1056 0.1360 2.2000e- 004 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 0.0000 19.1494 19.1494 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 19.1806 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6900e- 003 3.2200e- 003 0.0331 1.1000e- 004 0.0114 8.0000e- 005 0.0115 3.0400e- 003 7.0000e- 005 3.1100e- 003 0.0000 9.6165 9.6165 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 9.6231 Total 4.6900e- 003 3.2200e- 003 0.0331 1.1000e- 004 0.0114 8.0000e- 005 0.0115 3.0400e- 003 7.0000e- 005 3.1100e- 003 0.0000 9.6165 9.6165 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 9.6231 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 20 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.5279 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0153 0.1056 0.1360 2.2000e- 004 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 0.0000 19.1494 19.1494 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 19.1806 Total 0.5432 0.1056 0.1360 2.2000e- 004 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 6.1300e- 003 0.0000 19.1494 19.1494 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 19.1806 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6900e- 003 3.2200e- 003 0.0331 1.1000e- 004 0.0114 8.0000e- 005 0.0115 3.0400e- 003 7.0000e- 005 3.1100e- 003 0.0000 9.6165 9.6165 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 9.6231 Total 4.6900e- 003 3.2200e- 003 0.0331 1.1000e- 004 0.0114 8.0000e- 005 0.0115 3.0400e- 003 7.0000e- 005 3.1100e- 003 0.0000 9.6165 9.6165 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 9.6231 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 21 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.5968 2.6582 7.1356 0.0250 2.2135 0.0210 2.2344 0.5927 0.0196 0.6123 0.0000 2,309.145 2 2,309.145 2 0.1204 0.0000 2,312.153 9 Unmitigated 0.5968 2.6582 7.1356 0.0250 2.2135 0.0210 2.2344 0.5927 0.0196 0.6123 0.0000 2,309.145 2 2,309.145 2 0.1204 0.0000 2,312.153 9 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Hospital 2,400.00 1,509.60 1333.20 5,873,593 5,873,593 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2,400.00 1,509.60 1,333.20 5,873,593 5,873,593 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Hospital 9.60 9.60 9.60 64.90 16.10 19.00 73 25 2 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 22 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 282.9502 282.9502 0.0111 2.4700e- 003 283.9662 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 282.9502 282.9502 0.0111 2.4700e- 003 283.9662 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0223 0.2030 0.1705 1.2200e- 003 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 220.9343 220.9343 4.2300e- 003 4.0500e- 003 222.2472 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0223 0.2030 0.1705 1.2200e- 003 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 220.9343 220.9343 4.2300e- 003 4.0500e- 003 222.2472 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Hospital 0.598645 0.040929 0.181073 0.106149 0.015683 0.005479 0.016317 0.023976 0.001926 0.001932 0.006016 0.000753 0.001122 Parking Lot 0.598645 0.040929 0.181073 0.106149 0.015683 0.005479 0.016317 0.023976 0.001926 0.001932 0.006016 0.000753 0.001122 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 23 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hospital 4.14015e +006 0.0223 0.2030 0.1705 1.2200e- 003 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 220.9343 220.9343 4.2300e- 003 4.0500e- 003 222.2472 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0223 0.2030 0.1705 1.2200e- 003 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 220.9343 220.9343 4.2300e- 003 4.0500e- 003 222.2472 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hospital 4.14015e +006 0.0223 0.2030 0.1705 1.2200e- 003 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 220.9343 220.9343 4.2300e- 003 4.0500e- 003 222.2472 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0223 0.2030 0.1705 1.2200e- 003 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 220.9343 220.9343 4.2300e- 003 4.0500e- 003 222.2472 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 24 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Hospital 1.3092e +006 271.5654 0.0107 2.3800e- 003 272.5405 Parking Lot 54885.6 11.3848 4.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 11.4257 Total 282.9502 0.0111 2.4800e- 003 283.9662 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Hospital 1.3092e +006 271.5654 0.0107 2.3800e- 003 272.5405 Parking Lot 54885.6 11.3848 4.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 11.4257 Total 282.9502 0.0111 2.4800e- 003 283.9662 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 25 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.4421 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2100e- 003 2.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.3500e- 003 Unmitigated 0.4421 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2100e- 003 2.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.3500e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0528 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.3892 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2100e- 003 2.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.3500e- 003 Total 0.4421 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2100e- 003 2.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.3500e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 26 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0528 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.3892 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2100e- 003 2.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.3500e- 003 Total 0.4421 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.2100e- 003 2.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.3500e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 27 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 30.7539 0.2821 6.8800e- 003 39.8552 Unmitigated 30.7539 0.2821 6.8800e- 003 39.8552 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Hospital 8.62211 / 2.05288 30.7539 0.2821 6.8800e- 003 39.8552 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 30.7539 0.2821 6.8800e- 003 39.8552 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 28 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Hospital 8.62211 / 2.05288 30.7539 0.2821 6.8800e- 003 39.8552 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 30.7539 0.2821 6.8800e- 003 39.8552 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 35.5640 2.1018 0.0000 88.1084 Unmitigated 35.5640 2.1018 0.0000 88.1084 Category/Year CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 29 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Hospital 175.2 35.5640 2.1018 0.0000 88.1084 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 35.5640 2.1018 0.0000 88.1084 Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Hospital 175.2 35.5640 2.1018 0.0000 88.1084 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 35.5640 2.1018 0.0000 88.1084 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 30 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Emergency Generator 1 0.5 50 1073 0.73 Diesel Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 10.1 Stationary Sources ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Equipment Type tons/yr MT/yr Emergency Generator - Diesel (750 - 9999 HP) 0.0440 0.1969 0.1123 2.1000e- 004 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.4298 20.4298 2.8600e- 003 0.0000 20.5014 Total 0.0440 0.1969 0.1123 2.1000e- 004 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.4298 20.4298 2.8600e- 003 0.0000 20.5014 Unmitigated/Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 9/11/2020 11:05 AMPage 31 of 31 9434 Acadia Eastlake Behavioral Health Hospital - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual