The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021-05-05 SC Agenda Packet REV Date:Wednesday, May 5, 2021 Time:6:00 p.m. Location:Virtual, Via Teleconference PLEASE NOTE THAT, PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20, AND IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY, MEMBERS OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION AND STAFF MAY PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING VIA TELECONFERENCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXECUTIVE ORDER, THE PUBLIC MAY VIEW THE MEETING ONLINE AND NOT IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. HOW TO WATCH: Members of the public can access a link to the livestream at www.chulavistaca.gov/virtualmeetings. Members of the public who wish to join by telephone only, may call 1-844-992-4726 (U.S. Toll Free) and enter the access code: [187 215 1493]. HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS: Visit the online eComment portal for this meeting at: www.chulavistaca.gov/virtualmeetings. The commenting period will be open shortly after the agenda is published for a particular meeting and will remain open through the meeting, as described below. All comments will be available to the public and the Safety Commission using the eComment portal. Comments must be received prior to the time the Chair calls for the close of the commenting period. Comments received after such time will not be considered by the Safety Commission. If you have difficulty or are unable to submit a comment, please contact Safety Commission staff for assistance at SC@chulavistaca.gov. ACCESSIBILITY: Individuals with disabilities are invited to request reasonable modifications or accommodations in order to access and/or participate in a Safety Commission meeting by contacting the Engineering & Capital Projects Department at SC@chulavistaca.gov (California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. ***The City of Chula Vista is relying on commercial technology to livestream and accept public comments. If we have technical difficulties, we will resolve them as quickly as possible. City staff will take all possible measures to ensure a publicly accessible experience. *** Pages 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3.ROLL CALL Commissioners Cervantes, Fa’aola, Francisco, Hidinger, Munoz, Orso-Delgado, and Chair Marroquin. 4.PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons may address the Commission on any subject matter within the Commission’s jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Commission from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Commission may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. If you wish to comment, please submit comments electronically at: www.chulavistaca.gov/virtualmeetings. 5.ACTION ITEMS The Item(s) listed in this section of the agenda will be considered individually by the Commission and are expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. If you wish to comment on one of these items, you may do so at www.chulavistaca.gov/virtualmeetings. 5.1.RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL DECREASE THE EXISTING SPEED LIMIT ON MOSS ST BETWEEN BROADWAY & 2ND AVE FROM 35 TO 30 MPH, PRIMA FACIE LIMIT OF 25 MPH BTWN 2ND AVE & EAST CUL-DE-SAC BE ESTABLISHED, AND SCHEDULE X BE AMENDED 4 Staff Recommendation: Commission adopt the resolution. 6.PRESENTATIONS The following item(s) will be presentations given by staff. Action on these item(s) is typically limited to the Commission receiving the presentation and providing direction or feedback to staff, as appropriate. 6.1.Proposed Quality of Life Indicators - Presented by Growth Management Oversight Commission Liaisons: Kimberly Elliott, Facilities Financing Manager and Kim Vanderbie, Associate Planner Staff Recommendation: Commission hear presentation. 6.2.Assembly Bill 43 Status Update Staff Recommendation: Commission hear the presentation. 6.3.Police Department Traffic Collisions/Citations and CIP Update 13 Staff Recommendation: Commission hear the presentation. 7.STAFF COMMENTS 8.CHAIR COMMENTS 9.COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 2 of 38 10.ADJOURNMENT to the regular meeting on June 2, 2021 via teleconference in Chula Vista, California. Materials provided to the Safety Commission related to any open-session item on this agenda are available for public review at https://chulavista.granicusideas.com/meetings or by contacting the Engineering Department at SC@chulavistaca.gov. 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 3 of 38 SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT Item __ 1___ Meeting Date 05/05/2021 ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL DECREASE THE EXISTING SPEED LIMIT ON MOSS STREET BETWEEN BROADWAY AND SECOND AVENUE FROM 35 MPH TO 30 MPH, THAT A PRIMA FACIE LIMIT OF 25 MPH BETWEEN SECOND AVENUE AND THE EAST CUL-DE-SAC BE ESTABLISHED, AND THAT SCHEDULE X OF THE REGISTER MAINTAINED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THE REVISED SPEED LIMITS SUBMITTED BY: Principal Traffic Engineer Staff completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) on Moss Street between Industrial Boulevard and the easterly cul-de-sac (the “Segment”) in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), which indicate that the posting of speed limits that are not the maximum or standard prima facie speed limits defined by the CVC be determined by an E&TS for each street with a posted speed limit within the City between Industrial Boulevard and Second Avenue. Based on the results of the E&TS, staff has determined that the speed limit on Moss Street between Industrial Boulevard and Second Avenue should be 30 mph and Moss Street between Second Avenue and the cul-de- sac to the east should be established at 25 mph, prima facie as a residence district (see Attachment 1, Location Plat). RECOMMENDATION: That the Safety Commission adopt the resolution. DISCUSSION: The CVC establishes minimum and maximum prima facie speed limits for all streets in the State. The minimum prima facie speed limit is 25 mph for specific roadway conditions and the maximum speed limit is 65 mph (55 mph for undivided roads) and an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) is required to change the prima facie speed limit from these preset limits for any City roadway that do not meet those conditions. The CVC requires that local agencies review changes in local speed limits every five to ten years to determine if the existing street segment speed limits require updating due to the age of the E&TS or changes in roadway and traffic conditions. In April 2021, staff completed an E&TS for the Segment in accordance with the California Vehicle Code. Currently, the existing posted speed limit on Moss Street is 30 mph from Industrial Boulevard to Broadway, and 35 mph from Broadway to the easterly cul-de-sac. It is proposed to decrease the speed limit for this segment to 30 mph between Industrial Boulevard and Second Avenue, and to 25 mph from Second Avenue to the east cul-de-sac. 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 4 of 38 Page 2, Item _ 1__ Meeting Date 05/05/2020 As described in the California Vehicle Code, the survey shall include: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; (2) Accident records; (3) Traffic/roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Physical Conditions The following information describes the existing conditions along the subject Segment on Moss Street:  Two-lane Class III Collector  Length/Width – 1.3 miles long and 40’ wide  Average Daily Traffic: 6,631 (2021)  Number of Lanes: 2 lanes (1 per direction)  Existing Speed Limit – 30/35 mph  85% Percentile Speed: 37 mph  Striping – Two lanes of traffic  Parking – Parking is allowed along entire segment  Horizontal Alignment – Horizontal Curve with a radius of 2,740’ over a length of 650’ yields a design speed of 43 mph.  Vertical Alignment – Maximum grade change along segment is 2%.  Accident Rate History – The accident rate at this segment is 2.01 accidents per million vehicle miles, which is higher than the rate of 1.61 for similar roadways in the State of California (2018).  Two-lane Residence Road  Length/Width – 0.39 miles long and 40’-50’ wide  Average Daily Traffic: 490 (2021)  Number of Lanes: 2 lanes (1 per direction)  Existing Speed Limit – 35 mph  Striping – Two lanes of traffic with center two-way left-turn lane  Parking – Parking is allowed along entire segment Traffic Calming The proposed speed limits of 30 mph and 25 mph are lower than the existing speed limit along the Segment. Speed Enforceability If the proposed speed decrease is not approved, the following are the only means of enforcing speed on the Segment:  Basic Speed Law: police car matches speed of vehicle and determines that speed is unsafe for current conditions. Infeasible due to insufficient police availability and the segment is too short.  Maximum Speed Law: use RADAR/LiDAR methods to enforce speed limit of 65 mph. 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 5 of 38 Page 3, Item _ 1__ Meeting Date 05/05/2020 If the proposed speed limit is approved, police can use RADAR/LiDAR to enforce the approved posted speed limit. CONCLUSION: When speed limits are appropriately established the following objectives are achieved: - Meaningful, unambiguous enforcement - Voluntary public compliance - Clear identification of the unreasonable violator - Elimination of unjustifiable “tolerances” of higher speed travel Based on the 85th percentile speed of the roadway, as well as a higher than average collision rate outlined in the E&TS and roadway geometry, staff is recommending that the speed limit on Moss Street between Broadway and Second Avenue be decreased from 35 mph to 30 mph. Due to the changes to the roadway at the east end of Moss Street and the construction of the fire station, staff is recommending that the speed limit on Moss Street between Second Avenue and the cul- de-sac be decreased from 35 mph to the prima facie speed limit of 25 mph for a residence district. Should the City Council establish the proposed speed limits, Schedule X of the register maintained in the Office of the City Engineer be amended to reflect the speed limit:  Moss Street, between Industrial Boulevard and Broadway, maintain Speed Limit at 30 mph.  Moss Street, between Broadway and Second Avenue, proposed Speed Limit Decrease to 30 mph.  Moss Street, between Second Avenue and cul-de-sac to the east, proposed Speed Limit Decrease to prima facie 25 mph for a residence district. FISCAL IMPACT: The decrease of the speed limit between Broadway and the cul-de-sac to the east would require the posting of new speed limit signs and speed limit legends in applicable locations. This work will be funded by an existing Traffic Engineering Capital Improvement Project, TRF0332, Signing and Striping Program. Attachments: 1. Location Plat 2. Speed Survey 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 6 of 38 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 7 of 38 35 MPH 5 10 15 20 TOTAL %CUM % 50 0 0%100% 49 0 0%100% 48 0 0%100% 47 0 0%100% 46 0 0%100% 45 0 0%100% 44 0 0%100% 43 0 0%100% 42 O 1 1%100% 41 O 1 1%99% 40 0 0%98% 39 O O 2 2%98% 38 O /O /4 4%96% 37 O /O //5 5%93% 36 O //O /5 5%88% 35 O ///////O 9 8%84% 34 //O O O //O 8 7%75% 33 O O O O /O /O O //11 10%68% 32 /O /O //O O /O 10 9%58% 31 O ///O //O O O O 11 10%49% 30 /O O /O O O //O O /O O O 15 14%39% 29 /O /O ///O O //////O 16 15%25% 28 O 1 1%11% 27 O //O 4 4%10% 26 //O //5 5%6% 25 O /2 2%2% 24 0 0%0% 23 0 0%0% 22 0 0%0% 21 0 0%0% 20 0 0%0% 19 0 0%0% 18 0 0%0% 17 0 0%0% 16 0 0%0% 13 0 0%0% 12 0 0%0% 11 0 0%0% RECORDER:TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES: Moss Street (Industrial Boulevard - Broadway) 11:41 AM11:12 AM TIME END: 85TH PERCENTILE:36 mph SEGMENT UNDER STUDY: DATE: WEATHER: DIRECTION: WB = O EB = / Nancy Chen CITY OF CHULA VISTA - VEHICLE SPEED SURVEY 4/9/2021 SURVEY SITE: 648 Moss Street POSTED SPEED: TIME START: 110 Sunny J:\ENGINEER\TRAFFIC\ENG TRAF SURVEYS\Speed Limit Sureys\1 SPD SURVEY CHART 50.xls 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 8 of 38 35 MPH 5 10 15 20 TOTAL %CUM % 50 0 0%100% 49 0 0%100% 48 0 0%100% 47 0 0%100% 46 0 0%100% 45 0 0%100% 44 0 0%100% 43 0 0%100% 42 0 0%100% 41 0 0%100% 40 /O ///5 5%100% 39 ////4 4%95% 38 O //O O /6 6%92% 37 //O O 4 4%86% 36 O /O O O O O /O //11 10%83% 35 O /O O /O O O O ///12 11%72% 34 //O /O O O O //////14 13%61% 33 //O O O /O /O /O O O O O 15 14%49% 32 O O O /O O O O O //11 10%35% 31 O /O O O O /O O O ///O //16 15%25% 30 O O ///O 6 6%10% 29 /O /3 3%5% 28 0 0%2% 27 0 0%2% 26 /1 1%2% 25 /1 1%1% 24 0 0%0% 23 0 0%0% 22 0 0%0% 21 0 0%0% 20 0 0%0% 19 0 0%0% 18 0 0%0% 17 0 0%0% 16 0 0%0% 13 0 0%0% 12 0 0%0% 11 0 0%0% RECORDER:TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES: Moss Street (Fourth Avenue - Fifth Avenue) 11:05 AM10:35 AM TIME END: 85TH PERCENTILE:37 mph SEGMENT UNDER STUDY: DATE: WEATHER: DIRECTION: WB = O EB = / Nancy Chen CITY OF CHULA VISTA - VEHICLE SPEED SURVEY 4/9/2021 SURVEY SITE: 432 Moss Street POSTED SPEED: TIME START: 109 Sunny J:\ENGINEER\TRAFFIC\ENG TRAF SURVEYS\Speed Limit Sureys\1 SPD SURVEY CHART 50.xls 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 9 of 38 35 MPH 5 10 15 20 TOTAL %CUM % 50 0 0%100% 49 0 0%100% 48 0 0%100% 47 0 0%100% 46 0 0%100% 45 0 0%100% 44 0 0%100% 43 0 0%100% 42 /1 1%100% 41 O 1 1%99% 40 /O O O /5 5%98% 39 O /O 3 3%93% 38 /O O O O 5 5%91% 37 O //3 3%86% 36 ///O //6 6%83% 35 //O /O /O 7 7%77% 34 O O O /O 5 5%71% 33 //O /O //O //O O /O 14 13%66% 32 /O O /O /O O /O 10 9%53% 31 O O O /O //O /O O 11 10%43% 30 /////////9 8%33% 29 /O O O /O O O //10 9%25% 28 /O O /O //7 7%15% 27 //2 2%8% 26 O O O O /5 5%7% 25 O /2 2%2% 24 0 0%0% 23 0 0%0% 22 0 0%0% 21 0 0%0% 20 0 0%0% 19 0 0%0% 18 0 0%0% 17 0 0%0% 16 0 0%0% 13 0 0%0% 12 0 0%0% 11 0 0%0% RECORDER:TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES: Moss Street (Second Avenue - Third Avenue) 4:06 PM3:00 PM TIME END: 85TH PERCENTILE:37 mph SEGMENT UNDER STUDY: DATE: WEATHER: DIRECTION: WB = O EB = / Nancy Chen CITY OF CHULA VISTA - VEHICLE SPEED SURVEY 4/6/2021 SURVEY SITE: Across from 206 Moss Street POSTED SPEED: TIME START: 106 Sunny J:\ENGINEER\TRAFFIC\ENG TRAF SURVEYS\Speed Limit Sureys\1 SPD SURVEY CHART 50.xls 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 10 of 38 RESOLUTION NO. SC-2021-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL DECREASE THE EXISTING SPEED LIMIT ON MOSS STREET BETWEEN BROADWAY AND SECOND AVENUE FROM 35 MPH TO 30 MPH, THAT A PRIMA FACIE LIMIT OF 25 MPH BETWEEN SECOND AVENUE AND THE EAST CUL-DE-SAC BE ESTABLISHED, AND THAT SCHEDULE X OF THE REGISTER MAINTAINED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THE REVISED SPEED LIMITS WHEREAS, staff completed Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) on Moss Street between Industrial Boulevard and the east cul-de-sac (the “Segment”) in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), which stipulate that posted speed limits be determined by an E&TS for each street with a posted speed limit within the City except those determined by CVC-defined prima facie limits; and WHEREAS, as described in the CVC, the E&TS shall include: 1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident records; and 3) Traffic/roadside conditions not apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the CVC and CAMUTCD state that the speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed with a permitted 5 mph downward adjustment allowed for and elevated accident rate; and WHEREAS, the CVC indicates that an E&TS may be valid (and thus enforceable by the Police Department) for a period of up to ten (10) years or a time when conditions of the roadway change, whichever is sooner; and WHEREAS, with a valid E&TS, the posted speed limit on street can be enforced “prima facie,” which means that the Police Department can use RADAR/LIDAR technology to enforce the speed limit and the burden of proving whether the driver was proceeding at a safe speed is on the driver; and WHEREAS, denial of this resolution perpetuates the expired status of the E&TS for the Segment such that the Police Department will be unable to enforce the existing posted speed limit using RADAR/LIDAR technology; and WHEREAS, based on the 85th percentile speed of the roadway and the collision rate referenced in the E&TS, staff has determined that speed limit on Moss Street between Industrial Boulevard and Second Avenue should be decreased from 35 mph to 30 mph; and 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 11 of 38 Resolution No. SC 2021-____ Page 2 WHEREAS, based the changes to the roadway from the construction of the fire station and the roadway being a residence district, staff has determined that the speed limit on Moss Street between Second Avenue and the east cul-de-sac be decreased from 35 mph to prima facie 25 mph per CVC 22352(b)(1). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Safety Commission of the City of Chula Vista does hereby recommend that the City Council establish the proposed 30 mph speed limit and prima facie 25 mph speed limit on the Segment as outlined below and that Schedule X of the register maintained in the Office of the City Engineer be amended to reflect the speed limit decrease as follows:  Moss Street: from Industrial Boulevard to Second Avenue, 30 mph  Moss Street: from Second Avenue to cul-de-sac to the east, 25 mph prima facie (residence district) PASSED AND APPROVED by the Safety Commission of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 5th day of May 2021, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NAYS: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ____________________________________ Jorge Marroquin, Chair ATTEST: ______________________________________ Florence Picardal, Secretary 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 12 of 38 May 2021 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 13 of 38 Safety Commission 128 121 134 111 133 127 146 146 144 165 157 143 156 125 136 137 89 146 135 125 140 148 118 169 108 118 123 100 114 130 135 155 156 153 150 140 150 123 97 96 95 131 110 138 125 93 110112 104 79 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Nu m b e r o f C o l l i s i o n s Month 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 14 of 38 Safety Commission * Combined hazardous & non- hazardous violations (not counting parking citations) 1190 1138 1337 1651 1290 985 975 920 687 806 1105 806 1036 1032 950 909 479 909 882 1112 1168 757 565 605 1115 1241 24 1575 1275 1452 1053 1404 1256 541 580 529 714 655 514 138 1073 241 1144 933 1073 329 364 332 414 576 676 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Nu m b e r o f C i t a t i o n s Month 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 15 of 38 April 2021 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 16 of 38 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 17 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 18 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 19 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 20 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 21 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 22 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 23 of 38 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 24 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 25 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 26 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 27 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 28 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 29 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 30 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 31 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 32 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 33 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 34 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 35 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 36 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 37 of 38 Safety Commission 05/05/2021 SC Agenda Page 38 of 38 Safety Commission Meeting Time: 05-05-21 18:00 eComments Report J u III fj, foo g" Afjf,,,,,,,inda Gmini rrieirds SU",Y)",Y)0 11-J ',JJeuhr1I Safety Commission 05-05-21 14 3 2 0 1 18:00 Sentiments for All Meetings The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown. Overall Sentiment W Safety Commission 05-05-21 18:00 Ageii-iid�,,,, lig it Coii'nii"neinIls Yh�,uh,M 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons may address the Commission on 1 1 0 0 any subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Commission from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate,the Commission may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. If you wish to comment, please submit comments electronically at: www.chulavistaca.gov/virtual meetings. 5.1. RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY 1 1 0 0 COUNCIL DECREASE THE EXISTING SPEED LIMIT ON MOSS ST BETWEEN BROADWAY& 2ND AVE FROM 35 TO 30 MPH, PRIMA FACIE LIMIT OF 25 MPH BTWN 2ND AVE& EAST CUL-DE-SAC BE ESTABLISHED, AND SCHEDULE X BE AMENDED 6.1. Proposed Quality of Life Indicators- Presented by Growth 1 0 0 1 Management Oversight Commission Liaisons: Kimberly Elliott, Facilities Financing Manager and Kim Vanderbie, Associate Planner Sentiments for All Agenda Items The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown. Overall Sentiment Ageirtda heii,yv� hoir 4L �5W��1 C I", ��Ie ii sfu III s add ii ess �Ii a C oirn'n III III ir�y su "n, eii w III III flIw �uii,�IsOcfie,.,,j)n �Is ine.:4 flIM�ed as an Iler'fri ej)111 SIlaIle 11 fire,"j)II In Oscj�,,ms��ing, �,oii acfl�oir� �.,any ��ssue irv.,,,h,,ided oir�� flheageii,Wa, ,,.JW, rn,,,,,�)yschedOe flhe ifuPu IlUh,.Iuv 61scusMk.,,yjiro �.,)u uvifviw flIw rnaIliv11' 10 MzHL III[ you WIM"11 U,) s0,','yJr'[rIh C�.,'r)11 Inil e 1�11a-':III u C�',',, y wwy,),�cl uavos�ac,,,,,, g�vlvliii,�u,,,,,,,,�Ilii"t(,iiee�oii:gs,, Overall Sentiment �j �111"JOP 'R Hortensia Murillo Location:91911, Chela Vista Submitted At: 5:55pm 05-05-21 1 have been living at this address for over 20 years and traffic has been a tremendous big impact in both directions as well as being close to Hwy 5. 1 am in support of lowering the speed limit to 30- but then again driver's do not respect the speed limit or traffic lights which driver's are Trying to win the light on Moss and 5th ave. Which have cause multiple car accidents and property damage to 3 of my close neighbors. A,g�,r iir�C curuuiw,,,,uoL�ur U II IlQ1Yj II°SYJGII Ili//SII II II r�ll��11�11 SII i�iJlll A VII IIA C Y C 0iJIIIYJUII II SII C AS i�II�� NII "11'1111 S �A 01i`w Ilr'f�7�� all�"II"��611�II III"� II 611I��//SII°�� J�//% & ii J ""vi „r@�l �r,r/�ri� ,.i��., �r i� .,,/�� : o iI. ��o��+� ,v ��„r 6r' �: d1i iii. ,,.. ��,w��il. i y,;..i,J. !J „v@�� r ,.„v 1,,,, /.,U II ,, „fl..or i .,,,,,,, � v l• iI. .4 �J. r1 ��ro ��k Vy 11111 6'y"�/,/e- �� v+�wd �w, �b7!4Ug, �� II, h ��k ��k,�„u 1111�� . �� .w, rF�� II 0 'v,� � r�� .� ��k V, f,✓L ��k,�„9 w;>�k �� ,,,O��w..,,u 011 ��,,;v ��40 �,,;v 111111��.�y ��k ��.� UIIIII1']°,7,fl1.11 X11f11' �IIW7111'11 Overall Sentiment Illlllllllllllllllllllllllll��li: IIIIIIIII ,�,�� „t�� „ IIIIIIIIIIIII u,i„r�;,it r�>i Hortensia Murillo Location:91911, Chela Vista Submitted At: 6:20pm 05-05-21 1 have been living at this address for over 20 years and traffic has been a tremendous big impact in both directions as well as being close to Hwy 5. 1 am in support of lowering the speed limit to 30- but then again driver's do not respect the speed limit or traffic lights which driver's are Trying to win the light on Moss and 5th ave. Which have cause multiple car accidents and property damage to 3 of my close neighbors. ��,�u�uiuio�uoN NO)u 6. Qw,,fllury oll oill/ uc „,aUau,zay Gi,ow!Iii IlJiio�uoar<c�t u�h�uo6 ��vr u�u✓all�i6 IK!hi ikmidy I1r�1111o,ou, II acflliTk aind1 Chim Vaindl�oirllrurr, 11� ��u,U�o Ilall,�uaua�ar Overall Sentiment IIIIIIIIIIIII u,i„r�';,itr�'�� Hortensia Murillo Location:91911, Chela Vista Submitted At: 7:11 pm 05-05-21 1 totally agree with planning for a Kaiser Hospital in Chula Vista, but As to electric vehicles; scooters; golf carts and stations- Do not see The need for CV residents due to cost; space and impact on environment.