HomeMy WebLinkAboutSC 09-04-19 PACKET
REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Council Chambers
September 4, 2019 276 Fourth Avenue
6:00 p.m. Chula Vista, CA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Cervantes, Fa’aola, Marroquin, Munoz, Orso-Delgado, and Chair Hidinger
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
OPENING STATEMENT
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Commission on any subject matter within
the Commission’s jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits
the Commission from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if
appropriate, the Commission may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff.
Comments are limited to three minutes.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 2019 AND MAY 1, 2019
2. RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE PERMANENT CLOSURE OF
MOSS STREET, BETWEEN ALPINE AVENUE AND NAPLES STREET AND ALPINE
AVENUE BETWEEN MOSS STREET AND NAPLES STREET TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEW
FIRE STATION NO. 9
RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING THE REMOVAL OF STOP CONTROL ON THE NAPLES STREET APPROACHES
AT THE INTERSECTION OF NAPLES STREET AND FIRST AVENUE, AND TO
ACCORDINGLY AMEND SCHEDULE II OF THE REGISTER OF SCHEDULES MAINTAINED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
3. RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ESTABLISHING TEMPORARY PERPENDICULAR PARKING ALONG BOTH SIDES OF “D”
STREET, WEST OF WOODLAWN AVENUE
4. POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC DATA
5. PEDESTRIAN AND BIKEWAYS SAFETY PROGRAMS – CIP UPDATE
City of Chula Vista Boards & Commissions
Safety Commission
Page 2 ׀ Safety Commission Agenda September 4, 2019
OTHER BUSINESS
6. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
7. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS
8. STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT to the regular meeting on October 2, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Chula Vista, California.
Materials provided to the Safety Commission related to any open-session item on this agenda are
available for public review at the Engineering Dept. located at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building B, Chula
Vista during normal business hours.
In compliance with the
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend,
and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact the Human Resources Department at
(619) 691-5041 (California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least
forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting.
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION
Council Chambers
February 6, 2019 City Hall – Building A
6:00 p.m. 276 Fourth Avenue
CALL TO ORDER
Meeting called to order at 6:04 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Hidinger, Commissioners Cervantes, Fa’aola, Marroquin, and Munoz
Absent: Commissioners Jackson and Marshall
Staff present: Sr. Civil Engineer, Paul Oberbauer; Associate Engineer Ben Herrera; Officer Justin Zualet;
and Recording Secretary, Florence Picardal
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chair Hidinger.
OPENING STATEMENT
Opening statement read by Chair Hidinger.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 5, 2018
No minutes available.
2. RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A
LANE REDUCTION ON HIDDEN VISTA ROAD BETWEEN WINDJAMMER CIRCLE AND SMOKY
CIRCLE FROM THREE LANES TO TWO LANES AS A PILOT STUDY TO BE REVERSED SHOULD
FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME REQUIRE
City staff is recommending a lane reduction on Hidden Vista Drive between Windjammer Circle and Smoky
Circle from three lanes to two lanes. It is proposed to reduce the two southbound lanes to one lane between
Windjammer Circle and Smoky Circle and allow parking only in the former second southbound travel lane.
The existing striping between East H Street and Windjammer Circle will remain the same. Associate
Engineer Herrera gave a brief presentation.
Staff Recommendation: Safety Commission concur with staff and approve the lane reduction on Hidden
Vista Drive between Windjammer Circle and Smoky Circle.
Public hearing opened.
The following persons spoke in opposition to staff’s recommendation:
1. Natalii Gomez-Romo, Chula Vista resident
2. Fred Kassman, Chula Vista resident (submitted report to Commission)
3. Louis Pierotti, Chula Vista resident
4. Tory Schalge, Chula Vista resident
5. Michael Haynes, Chula Vista resident
Safety Commission Minutes
February 6, 2019 Page 2
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
6. Georgianne Van Patten, Chula Vista resident
7. Ken Willard, Chula Vista resident
8. Sally Epley, Chula Vista resident
9. Eric Gibson, Chula Vista resident
10. Lillie Hebert, Chula Vista resident
11. Marni Hayman, Chula Vista resident
12. Jeffrey Jimenez, Chula Vista resident
13. Diana Ortiz, Chula Vista resident
14. Stanley Beggs, Chula Vista resident
15. Connie Pappas, Chula Vista resident (representing Windjammer)
16. Angel Blas, Chula Vista resident
17. Maricela Blas, Chula Vista resident (did not speak)
18. Matilda Bermudez, Chula Vista resident
19. Margie Wees, Chula Vista resident (representing Windjammer)
20. Patricia Martinez, Chula Vista resident (did not speak)
21. Joe Martinez, Chula Vista resident
22. Imelda Ladrillono, Chula Vista resident
23. George Knoll, Chula Vista resident (Terra Nova)
24. Eugenia Aguilar Franco, Chula Vista resident (also submitted written statement)
25. John Rocks, Chula Vista resident
26. Leonor Haynes, Chula Vista resident (did not speak)
27. Carlos Rodriguez, Chula Vista resident
28. Karren Ballez, Chula Vista resident
The following person spoke in favor of staff’s recommendation:
1. Anthony Williams, Chula Vista resident
Public hearing closed.
There was discussion amongst the Commission regarding safety concerns and the addition of on-street
parking. Commissioner Marroquin thanked the residents for attending the meeting and voicing their
concerns.
Motion made by Commissioner Fa’aola and seconded by Chair Hidinger to adopt a resolution.denying a
lane reduction on Hidden Vista Road between Windjammer Circle and Smoky Circle. MOTION PASSED
5-0-2 (Jackson and Marshall absent).
Motion made by Commissioner Fa’aola and seconded by Commissioner Marroquin to direct staff to re-
evaluate Hidden Vista Road for traffic calming solutions. MOTION PASSED 5-0-2 (Jackson and Marshall
absent).
3. RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECOMMENDING
THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL INCREASE THE SPEED LIMIT ON PASEO DEL REY FROM
EAST “J” STREET TO EAST “H” STREET FROM 35 MPH TO 40 MPH
Sr. Civil Engineer Oberbauer gave a brief presentation.
Staff Recommendation: Safety Commission concur with staff and recommend that the Chula Vista City
Council increase the existing speed limit on Paseo Del Rey between East “H” Street and East “J” Street
from 35 mph to 40 mph and that the Schedule X of the register maintained in the Office of the City Engineer
be amended to reflect these speed limits.
Safety Commission Minutes
February 6, 2019 Page 3
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
Public hearing opened.
The following persons spoke in opposition to staff’s recommendation:
1. Ruth Ann Walker, Chula Vista resident
2. Jaime Blase, Chula Vista resident
3. Ana Rosa Munoz, Chula Vista resident
Public hearing closed.
Motion made by Commissioner Marroquin and seconded by Commissioner Munoz to approve the resolution
recommending that the Chula Vista City Council increase the speed limit on Paseo Del Rey from East “J”
Street to East “H” Street from 35 mph to 40 mph. MOTION FAILED 2-3-2 (Cervantes and Fa’aola voting
yes; Marroquin, Hidinger, Munoz voting no; Jackson and Marshal absent.
4. RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAINTAINING 25 MPH
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON VARIOUS SEGMENTS CITYWIDE ON THE BASIS THAT THEY
QUALIFY AS RESIDENCE OR BUSINESS DISTRICTS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE
Sr. Civil Engineer Oberbauer gave a brief presentation.
Staff Recommendation: Maintain 25mph prima facie speed limits on the subject roadway segments.
Motion made by Commissioner Fa’aola seconded by Commissioner Munoz to adopt the resolution
maintaining 25 mph prima facie speed limit on various segments citywide on the basis that they qualify as
residence or business districts under the California Vehicle Code. MOTION PASSED 5-2, Jackson and
Marshall absent.
5. POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC DATA
Officer Zualet gave a brief presentation.
3. PEDESTRIAN AND BIKEWAYS SAFETY PROGRAMS – CIP UPDATE
Sr. Civil Engineer Oberbauer gave a brief presentation.
OTHER BUSINESS
6. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS
Commissioner Marroquin stated he will be unable to attend next month’s meeting.
Safety Commission Minutes
February 6, 2019 Page 4
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
7. STAFF COMMENTS
Sr. Civil Engineer Oberbauer gave an update on the street names along Birth Road alignment (item on
December 5, 2018 agenda). He stated that landowners on both sides of State Street were contacted and
their preference was to change the name to Birch Road instead of Santa Diana. An item will be docketed at
a future date.
Secretary Picardal stated that Commissioner Marshall will be relocating to Southwest Florida and has
resigned effective today. The vacancy has been posted and persons may apply on the City’s website.
ADJOURNMENT at 7:15 p.m. to the regular meeting on March 6, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Chula Vista, California.
Respectfully submitted,
Florence Picardal, Recording Secretary
J:\Engineer\TRAFFIC\SAFETY COMMISSION\2019\2019-02\02-06-19 MINUTES.doc
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION
May 1, 2019 Council Chambers
6:00 p.m. 276 Fourth Avenue
CALL TO ORDER
Meeting called to order at 6:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Hidinger; Commissioners Cervantes, Fa’aola, Marroquin, and Munoz (arrived at 6:04
p.m.)
Absent: Commissioner Jackson
Staff present: Sr. Civil Engineer, Paul Oberbauer; Officer Christopher Fisher; and Recording Secretary,
Florence Picardal
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chair Hidinger.
OPENING STATEMENT
Opening statement read by Chair Hidinger.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments.
1. PRESENTATION – SPEED LIMIT REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES
Sr. Civil Engineer Oberbauer gave a presentation on: 1) Speed limit establishment process, 2) How speed
limits are determined and why; 3) Enforceability of posted speed limits; 4) Traffic calming strategies using
signage and striping; and 5) Traffic calming strategies using surface improvements. Going forward, the
following steps will be followed: 1) Proposed speed limit items will discuss enforcement consequences of a
vote for and against, 2) Engineering & traffic survey results will be discussed in more detail in the staff
report, 3) Staff report will discuss traffic calming measures that have been implemented or planned, if any,
and 4) AAA Effective Speed Zoning document will be attached for reference to every speed limit item.
2. POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC DATA
Officer Fisher gave a brief presentation.
3. PEDESTRIAN AND BIKEWAYS SAFETY PROGRAMS – CIP UPDATE
Sr. Civil Engineer Oberbauer gave a brief presentation.
OTHER BUSINESS
4. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS
On April 24 & 25, Commissioner Cervantes, Marroquin and Munoz attended a live demo in a connected-
ready Tesla on Anaheim Boulevard. Using already in-place communication technologies, they learned
how traffic signal status and safety warnings can be transmitted without needing additional equipment
Safety Commission Minutes
May 1, 2019 Page 2
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
for the vehicle. This technology makes safety benefits immediately available to all road users in the
community.
Commissioner Cervantes voiced concerns about the Soapy Joe’s back up on Bonita Road. Sr. Civil
Engineer Oberbauer responded that intersection is currently being monitored.
5. STAFF COMMENTS
Sr. Civil Engineer Oberbauer thanked the Commissioners who attended the demo in Anaheim. He also
mentioned that a new Safety Commissioner, Pedro Orso-Delgado, has been selected.
ADJOURNMENT at 7:15 p.m. to the regular meeting on June 5, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Chula Vista, California.
Respectfully submitted,
Florence Picardal, Recording Secretary
J:\Engineer\TRAFFIC\SAFETY COMMISSION\2019\2019-05\05-01-19 MINUTES.doc
Page 2, Item 2__
Meeting Date 9/04/19
ADAM (Apparatus Deployment Analysis Module) was utilized to determine the optimum site
that provided the most reduction in response times.
Proposed Street Closures
The location of the proposed new Fire Station No. 9 and the project parameters require that
segments of Moss Street and Alpine Avenue be closed to vehicular traffic and the right of way
lands be designated as Fire Station lands. The segment of Moss Street between Alpine Avenue
and Naples Street and the segment of Alpine Avenue between Moss Street and Naples Street are
needed to accommodate the fire station building, critical fire station site features, site circulation,
and parking. Additionally, the project includes a new traffic signal at the apparatus bay exit onto
Naples Street opposite the southern portion of Alpine Avenue.
The proposed closures of Moss Street and Alpine Avenue would result in a new cul-de-sac on
Moss Street near the current intersection with Alpine Avenue. Naples Street would no longer
have access to Moss Street directly or via the north segment of Alpine Avenue. The new
arrangement can be seen in Attachments 1 and 2. City traffic staff have reviewed the proposed
closure and determined that it will not adversely affect traffic flow in the area. Naples Street has
adequate capacity to absorb the resulting nominal increase in volume. In addition, the proposed
closures will not impact access to existing private residences.
Stop Control at Naples St/First Av Not Warranted
Due to the proposed road closures, City traffic staff analyzed the intersection of Moss and Naples
Street with First Avenue using the City’s all-way stop intersection control criteria. The analysis
modeled the intersection as diverting the traffic that had used Moss Street to Naples Street
(Attachment 3). This increased the difference in volume between Naples Street and the
intersecting First Avenue to the point at which including stop control on the Naples Street
approaches was no longer warranted. Therefore, staff is proposing that the stop control only be
maintained at the First Avenue approach because of the proposed road closures.
FISCAL IMPACT: Costs for the construction of the fire station including reconfiguration of
the roadway segments proposed for closure will be borne by Capital Improvement Project
GG230. Ongoing maintenance costs will shift from the Department of Public Works to the Fire
Department.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Site Map
3. All-Way Stop Warrant Study Naples/First
J:\Engineer\TRAFFIC\SAFETY COMMISSION\2019\2019-09\Fire Station 9 Road Changes\SC Report Fire Station 9.docx
CHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENTCHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Station No. 9 Location
Moss St
FS#9
CHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENTCHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENT
Case 1:
Case 2:
Case 3:
The subject intersection shall receive a bonus of 10 points.POINTS:0
1)
0
POINTS:0
2)
1)Adjacent to school, fire station, playground, senior center and/or amusement park.
3 pts
a)7 points
b)5 points
c)3 points
d)1 pointwithin 500’ of the intersection.
(c)The subject intersection is not within 600 feet from the nearest controlled intersection along the collector,
and
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
ACCIDENT WARRANT: ( 25 points )
between 251’-400’ from the intersection.
ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT SUMMARY
PAGE
1 OF 6
LOCATION Naples St and First Ave
DATE
(7 points maximum )
between 101’-250’ from the intersection.
6/12/2019
(a)The street to be controlled is within a residence district as defined in Section 515 of the California Vehicle
Code, and
(b)The street to be controlled is classified a collector or is functioning as a collector, and
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are 100. The installation of an all-way
stop control is justified with a minimum of 45 points, unless:
POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
Five Points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an all-way stop control during any 12-
month period prior to the investigation date.
3/6/2001478-03
GENERAL
If Caltrans' criteria is met, the point system is not applicable.
If any of the five criteria is met to the extent of 100% an all-way stop control intersection may be warranted
even though the minimum number of points is not accumulated.
If the following conditions are met:
within 100’ of the intersection.
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop:
( Maximum 25 points )
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT: ( 21 points )
2)
400 0 pts
190
a)7 points
b)6 points
c)5 points
d)4 points
e)3 points
f)2 points
g)1 point
3)An intersection leading to an arterial from an interior (circular) collector.0 pts 2 points
4)
a)greater than 9% grade 7 points
b)greater than 8% grade 0 pts 5 points
c)greater than 7% grade 3 points
d)greater than 6% grade 1 point
5)
a)intersection is 300’ from school grounds.7 points
b)intersection is 400’ from school grounds.0 pts 5 points
c)intersection is 500’ from school grounds.3 points
d)intersection is 600’ from school grounds.1 point
6)1 pts
a)1 point
b)4 points
c)7 points
7)Adjacent to bus stop 2 points
Public mailbox 2 points
School bus drop-off 2 pts 7 points
POINTS:6
> 100%
DATE
x 100 =
provides for less than 60% of the required sight distance.
provides for less than 70% of the required sight distance.
211%
2 OF 66/12/2019
LOCATION Naples St and First Ave PAGE
Intersection is on “Suggested Route To School” and no other controlled crossing is located within 600’.
(7 points maximum)
provides for less than 40% of the required sight distance.
provides for less than 50% of the required sight distance.
provides for less than 80% of the required sight distance.
Any visibility obstruction including horizontal and/or vertical curves which result in limited stopping sight
distance based on either the posted speed limit or the 85% tile speed, whichever is higher.
(7 points maximum)
Intersection with steep grades within 500’ from the intersection on the downhill approach.
provides for less than 100 % of the required sight distance.
High approach speeds.
prevailing speeds are up to 5 mph higher than posted speed.
( Maximum 21 points )
ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT SUMMARY
provides for less than 90% of the required sight distance.
POLICY NUMBER 478-03 3/6/2001
prevailing speeds are up to 10 mph higher than posted speed.
prevailing speeds are more than 10 mph higher than posted speed.
EFFECTIVE DATE
3)
0
1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-OVER
4 8 12 16 20
POINTS:0
4)
POINTS:9
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major street during the busiest hour of an
average day.
( Maximum 20 points )
Volumes:
Points:
DATE
PEDESTRIAN VOLUME ( 20 points )
Pedestrians crossing major street, Total during the peak pedestrian hour
POLICY NUMBER
5/22/2019 4:00pm-5:00pm
6/12/2019
-3 POINTS ARE ASSIGNED PER HOUR WHEN TOTAL ENTERING VEHICULAR VOLUMES EXCEED 500
AND MINOR STREET VOLUMES (INCLUDING PEDESTRIANS) EXCEED 200.
478-03 EFFECTIVE DATE
3 OF 6
LOCATION Naples St and First Ave PAGE
Peak Hour:Number of Pedestrians:
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the intersection during the eight
busiest hours of an average day.
3/6/2001
ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT SUMMARY
In residence districts as defined by Section 515 CVC, if the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street
exceeds 35 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrants is 70% of the above requirements.
TRAFFIC VOLUME ( 24 points ) *
( Maximum 24 points )
-2 POINTS ARE ASSIGNED PER HOUR WHEN TOTAL ENTERING VOLUMES EXCEED 500 BUT MINOR
STREET VOLUMES ARE LESS THAN 200, BUT MORE THAN 100.
-1 POINT IS ASSIGNED PER HOUR WHEN TOTAL ENTERING VEHICULAR VOLUMES EXCEED 500 BUT
MINOR STREET VOLUMES ARE LESS THAN 100.
-1 POINT IS ASSIGNED PER HOUR WHEN TOTAL ENTERING VEHICULAR VOLUMES DO NOT MEET
500, BUT MINOR STREET VOLUMES EXCEED 200.
Traffic Counts (circle eight highest hour volumes):
DIRECTION 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 TOTAL
NB 61 142 96 38 40 54 41 67 93 74 56 81 60 46 38 987
SB 0
SUBTOTAL 61 142 96 38 40 54 41 67 93 74 56 81 60 46 38 987
EB 258 610 472 352 395 457 471 475 754 821 762 766 580 502 333 8008
WB 212 499 460 288 269 334 347 310 441 663 470 479 401 292 250 5715
SUBTOTAL 470 1109 932 640 664 791 818 785 1195 1484 1232 1245 981 794 583 13723
TOTAL 531 1251 1028 678 704 845 859 852 1288 1558 1288 1326 1041 840 621 14710
POINTS 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5)
987
5,715
PERCENTAGE POINTS
95-100 10
85-94 9
75-84 8
65-74 7
55-64 6
45-54 5
35-44 4
25-34 3
15-24 2
5-14 1
0-4 0
POINTS:2
1)
2)
3)
*24-Hour Major St. Approach Volumes x 100 =
6/12/2019
*For T-intersections, the percent is the ratio of the minor street approach volume to the highest single leg
approach volume on the major street multiplied by one hundred.
CALTRANS CRITERIA (CA MUTCD)
x 100 = 17.3%
( Maximum 10 points )
( ** ) This speed applies only to Caltrans Criteria
Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that
can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within a 12 month period of a type
susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right- and left-turn collisions
as well as right-angle collisions.
ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT SUMMARY
POLICY NUMBER
Naples St and First AveLOCATION PAGE
DATE 4 OF 6
Minimum traffic volumes - The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must
average at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and the combined vehicular, bicycle,
and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same
8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the
maximum hour, but when the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per
hour ( ** ), the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements.
478-03 EFFECTIVE DATE 3/6/2001
TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE ( 10 POINTS )
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points
shall be assigned in accordance with the following table:
*24-Hour Minor St. Approach Volumes
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation, regardless of the point system:
(Major)(Minor)
17
*modified to close off Moss St for future fire station plans
5 OF 6
POLICY NUMBER
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED:
TOTAL SCORE:points out of a possible 100.
June 12, 2019
EFFECTIVE DATE 3/6/2001
The minimum required to justify an all-way stop control is 45 points.
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
INTERSECTION:
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM:
First Ave
DATE
PAGELOCATION
478-03
6/12/2019
ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT SUMMARY
Naples St and First Ave
Naples St
FIRST AV
MOSS ST
NAPLES ST
Otay Valley Road
Palm Avenue
REMARKS:
6/12/2019
3/6/2001
DATE 6 OF 6
RECOMMENDATIONS:
POLICY NUMBER
ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT SUMMARY
LOCATION
478-03 EFFECTIVE DATE
Naples St and First Ave PAGE
J:/Engineer/Traffic/Staff/Susanm/All-Way Stop Studies/A-W Stop (Clubhouse - Creekside).xls
FISCAL IMPACT: Per the City’s Master Fee Schedule, the City’s cost to stripe the
perpendicular parking spaces is approximately $2,000.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Parking Layout Exhibit
J:\Engineer\TRAFFIC\SAFETY COMMISSION\2019\2019-08\D Street\D Street Report.docx
Page 2, Item 3__
Meeting Date 9/04/19
D Street Location Map
Date Printed:Au gust 28, 2019
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
0 290 580 870 1,160145
ft
* Combined hazardous & non-hazardous violations (not counting parking citations)
1760
2456
1922 1892
1106 1032
1598 1547
1234
1128
1604
1164
1069
960
70
1354
828 892 867
1340
1249
579
1062
698
1190 1138
1337
1651
1290
985 975 920
687
806
1105
806
1115
1241
24
1575
1275
1452
1053
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Month
Traffic Citations*
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
A
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
s
Month
Traffic Accidents
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
8/29/2019Tr Summary Graphs 082919
8/30/2019
1
September 2019
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
8/30/2019
2
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
8/30/2019
3
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
8/30/2019
4
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
8/30/2019
5
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
9
-20
1
9