HomeMy WebLinkAboutSC 02-06-19 PACKET (2)REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Council Chambers
February 6, 2019 276 Fourth Avenue
6:00 p.m.Chula Vista, CA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Cervantes,Fa’aola,Jackson,Marroquin,Marshall,Munoz,and Chair Hidinger
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
OPENING STATEMENT
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Commission on any subject matter within
the Commission’s jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda.State law generally prohibits
the Commission from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda,but, if
appropriate, the Commission may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff.
Comments are limited to three minutes.
1.APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 5, 2018
2.RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING A LANE REDUCTION ON HIDDEN VISTA ROAD BETWEEN WINDJAMMER
CIRCLE AND SMOKY CIRCLE FROM THREE LANES TO TWO LANES AS A PILOT STUDY
TO BE REVERSED SHOULD FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME REQUIRE
3.RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL INCREASE THE SPEED
LIMIT ON PASEO DEL REY FROM EAST “J” STREET TO EAST “H” STREET FROM 35 MPH
TO 40 MPH
4.RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MAINTAINING 25 MPH PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON VARIOUS SEGMENTS CITYWIDE
ON THE BASIS THAT THEY QUALIFY AS RESIDENCE OR BUSINESS DISTRICTS UNDER
THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE
5.POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC DATA
6.PEDESTRIAN AND BIKEWAYS SAFETY PROGRAMS –CIP UPDATE
City of Chula Vista Boards & Commissions
Safety Commission
Page 2 ׀ Safety Commission Agenda February 6, 2019
OTHER BUSINESS
7.COMMISSIONERS’COMMENTS
8.STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT to the regular meeting on March 6,2019 at 6:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers.Chula
Vista, California.
Materials provided to the Safety Commission related to any open-session item on this agenda are
available for public review at the Engineering Dept.located at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building B, Chula
Vista during normal business hours.
In compliance with the
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend,
and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact the Human Resources Department at
(619) 691-5041 (California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least
forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting.
Page 2, Item _2__
Meeting Date 02/06/19
Year 2008 2018
Northbound ADT 2,674 3,062
Southbound ADT 3,040 3,405
Total ADT 5,714 6,467
The ADT in both directions increased slightly over the last ten years with no significant impacts.
The single northbound traffic volume was approximately the same as the southbound traffic
volume spread across two lanes. Therefore,a southbound lane reduction is not expected to
negatively impact the traffic circulation.City staff also monitored the traffic volume when
Clearview Elementary was dismissed in the afternoon.Over the half hour of peak school traffic,
the southbound vehicle queue from the E. “H” Street signal backed up to Windjammer Circle for
two traffic signal cycles, but not into the area of the proposed lane reduction.
The lane reduction will be a pilot program based on annual analysis and monitoring of the traffic
circulation. The City Traffic Engineer can reverse the striping if future traffic volume dictates a
reversal to the original condition.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the ADT on Hidden Vista Drive, between Windjammer Circle and Smoky Circle,staff
has determined that the lane reduction in the southbound direction will not impact the traffic.
The lane reduction will potentially reduce the downhill speed and create more parking.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The revision to the striping and the signage modification will be incorporated into an existing
pavement CIP. Therefore, no impact to City funds.
Attachments:
1.Location Plat
RESOLUTION NO. SC-2019-_____
ITEM TITLE:RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING A LANE REDUCTION ON HIDDEN VISTA
DRIVE, BETWEEN WINDJAMMER CIRCLE AND SMOKY
CIRCLE FROM THREE LANES TO TWO LANES AS A
PILOT STUDY TO BE REVERSED SHOULD FUTURE
TRAFFIC VOLUME REQUIRE
WHEREAS,a City Capital Improvement Project will re-pave Hidden Vista Drive,
between Windjammer Circle and Smoky Circle and allow striping modifications for a lane
reduction; and
WHEREAS,residents have expressed concerns about speeding on the subject segment;
and
WHEREAS,residents of the Montillo Neighborhood have expressed concerns about
parking in their neighborhood due to overflow parking from the surrounding condominiums; and
WHEREAS, the measured traffic volumes for both northbound and southbound Hidden
Vista Drive are comparable despite there being two lanes in the southbound direction; and
WHEREAS, observations of peak afternoon school traffic associated with Clearview
Elementary School indicated that queuing on southbound Hidden Vista Drive from East “H”
Street does not extend beyond Windjammer Circle; and
WHEREAS, a lane reduction is proposed in the southbound direction of Hidden Vista
Drive, between Windjammer Circle and Smoky Circle, from two lanes to one lane; and
WHEREAS, the removed travel lane is proposed to be designated for parking where
permissible; and
WHEREAS, as a pilot study, traffic volumes on the subject segment will be monitored,
and the lane reduction will be reversed to restore existing conditions should traffic volumes
necessitate the reversal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Safety Commission of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby approve a lane reduction on southbound Hidden Vista Drive from two
lanes to one lane, to be monitored and potentially reversed should new traffic volume indicate that
two lanes are required in the subject segment.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the Safety Commission of the City of Chula Vista, California,
this 6th day of February 2019, by the following vote:
Resolution No. SC 2019-____
Page 2
AYES:Commissioners:
NAYS:Commissioners:
ABSENT:Commissioners:
____________________________________
Ron Hidinger, Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Florence Picardal, Secretary
Page 2, Item _3__
Meeting Date 02/06/19
Physical Conditions
The following information describes the existing conditions along all segments of Paseo Del
Rey:
Classification Between E.‘H’Street and E.‘J’Street –Class I Collector.
Length/Width –1,113 feet (0.21 miles) long and 36’ to 52’ wide.
Average Daily Traffic: 1,888
Number of Lanes:four lanes (2 per direction).
Existing Speed Limits –Posted 35 mph.
85% Percentile Speed:41 mph.
Striping –Four lanes of traffic and a Yellow striped median.
Parking –Parking is not allowed along entire segment.
Bike Lanes in both directions.
Horizontal Alignment –Horizontal Curve south of East “H” Street with a radius of 50’
over a length of 392’ yields a design speed of 38 mph.
Vertical Alignment –Crest Vertical Curve north of East “J” Street with a -0.2% to -7.3%
grade change over 400’along the centerline yields a design speed of 42 mph
Accident Rate History –The accident rate at this segment is 0.25 accidents per million
vehicle miles, which is lower than the rate of 1.37 for similar roadways in the State of
California (2015).
CONCLUSION:
When speed limits are appropriately established the following objectives are achieved:
-Meaningful, unambiguous enforcement
-Voluntary public compliance
-Clear identification of the unreasonable violator
-Elimination of unjustifiable “tolerances” of higher speed travel
Based on the 85th percentile speed of the roadway, as well as a low collision rate outlined in the
Engineering/Traffic Survey, staff has determined that the speed limit on Paseo Del Rey between
E.‘H’Street and E.‘J’Street be increased from 35 mph to 40 mph.
Should the City Council establish the proposed 40 mph speed limit,Schedule X of the register
maintained in the Office of the City Engineer be amended to reflect the speed limit increase:
Paseo Del Rey, beginning at E.‘H’Street and ending at E.‘J’Street, proposed Speed
Limit Increase to 40 mph.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Page 3, Item _3__
Meeting Date 02/06/19
The increase of the speed limit would require the posting of new speed limit signs and speed
limit legends. This work will be funded by an existing Traffic Engineering Capital Improvement
Project, TF-332, Signing and Striping Program.
Attachments:
1.Location Plat
2.Speed Survey
LOCATION MAP
SUMMARY OF SPEED SURVEYS
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
SURVEY RESULTS
85th Percentile (mph): 41 mph
California (2015).
grade difference over 400' yields a design speed of 42 mph.
length of 392' yields a recommended design speed of 38 mph.
Accident History:
which is lower than the average rate of 1.37 for similar highways in the State of
12,431 (2013)Average Daily Traffic:
On-Street Parking:
SPEED LIMIT - ENGINEERING/TRAFFIC SURVEY
LIMITS:
Segment:
STREET:
Approved Speed Limit (mph):
Per CVC 40802, Survey Expires: 10/2/2025
85th percentile speed and install curve
warning signs with advisory speed of
By:
Date Recommendation Approved:
Paul Oberbauer, P.E.
Date: 10/4/2018
Recommendation: Increase the speed limit to 40mph due to
35mph in both directions.
Range of Speeds Recorded (mph): 30 - 48
Special Conditions:
Vertical Alignment: A crest vertical curve located just north of East "J" Street with a -2.0% to -7.3%
64' - 82' (curb to curb)
Parking is prohibited except for the first 135' north of East "J" Street on the east
A horizontal curve located south of East "H" Street with a radius of 500' and a
4 lanes (2 per direction, with a left turn lane at Evangelical Church Driveway)
Width (ft):
100
Nancy Cen
The accident rate of this segment is 0.25 (accidents per million vehicle miles),
Study was Prepared by:
Length of Segment (ft):
located on the northeast corner of East "J" Street and Paseo Del Rey.
There are bike lanes on both sides of Paseo Del Rey. The Evangelical Church is
Date Taken:
No. of Vehicles on Sample (cars):
Existing Posted Limit (mph):
Horizontal Alignment:
side of the road.
Total No. of Lanes:
Paseo Del Rey
East "H" Street to East "J" Street
1,525 feet (0.29 miles)
35 mph
East "H" Street to East "J" Street
10/2/2018
35 mph
MPH 5 10 15 20 TOTAL %CUM %
60 0 0%100%
59 0 0%100%
58 0 0%100%
57 0 0%100%
56 0 0%100%
55 0 0%100%
54 0 0%100%
53 0 0%100%
52 0 0%100%
51 0 0%100%
50 0 0%100%
49 0 0%100%
48 0 1 1%100%
47 0 1 1%99%
46 0 0%98%
45 0 1 1%98%
44 0 0%97%
43 0 /0 //5 5%97%
42 0 0 ///5 5%92%
41 ///3 3%87%←85th
40 0 //0 0 0 //0 /10 10%84%
39 0 /////0 0 0 /0 11 11%74%
38 /0 /0 /0 0 /0 0 /11 11%63%
37 0 0 0 /0 0 0 //0 0 11 11%52%
36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /0 10 10%41%
35 /////0 0 /0 0 10 10%31%
34 //0 0 ///7 7%21%
33 ///0 ///7 7%14%
32 0 /0 ///6 6%7%
31 0 0%1%
30 0 1 1%1%
29 0 0%0%
28 0 0%0%
27 0 0%0%
26 0 0%0%
25 0 0%0%
24 0 0%0%
23 0 0%0%
22 0 0%0%
21 0 0%0%
TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES:
85th percentile speed:41 mph
CITY OF CHULA VISTA - VEHICLE SPEED SURVEY
DIRECTION: NB = O SB = \
100RECORDER: Nancy Cen
SEGMENT UNDER STUDY: Paseo Del Rey (E H St - E J St)
DATE:10/2/2018 SURVEY SITE:Paseo Del Rey (E H St - E J St) Mid-block POSTED SPEED:
TIME START:12:45 TIME END:1:00 WEATHER:Clear
H:\HOME\ENGINEER\TRAFFIC\Speed_Surveys\Paseo Del Rey (E H St - E J St) RADAR 2018.xls
RESOLUTION NO. SC-2019-_____
ITEM TITLE:RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY
COUNCIL INCREASE THE EXISTING SPEED LIMIT ON
PASEO DEL REY BETWEEN EAST ‘H’ STREET AND EAST
‘J’ STREET FROM 35 MPH TO 40 MPH,AND THAT
SCHEDULE X OF THE REGISTER MAINTAINED IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER BE AMENDED TO
REFLECT THE REVISED SPEED LIMIT
WHEREAS,staff completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) on a segment of
Paseo Del Rey in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC), which indicates that the
posting of speed limits be determined by an Engineering and Traffic Survey for each street with a
posted speed lime within the City; and
WHEREAS, as described in the California Vehicle Code, the speed survey shall include:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident records; and
3) Traffic/roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and
WHEREAS, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)states that the
speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5mph increment of the 85th percentile speed. Also,
if the 5mph reduction is applied, the Engineering and Traffic Survey shall document in writing
the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or
Traffic Engineer; and
WHEREAS, based on the 85th percentile speed of the roadway, as well as a low collision
rate outline in the E&TS, staff has determined that speed limit on Paseo Del Rey between E. ‘H’
Street and E. ‘J’ Street should be increased from 35 mph to 40 mph ; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Safety Commission of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby recommend that the City Council,establish the proposed 40 mph speed
limit and that Schedule X of the register maintained in the Office of the City Engineer be
amended to reflect the speed limit increase as follows:
Paseo Del Rey, beginning at E. ‘H’ Street and ending at E. ‘J’ Street, proposed
speed limit increase to 40 mph.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the Safety Commission of the City of Chula Vista, California,
this 6th day of February 2019, by the following vote:
AYES:Commissioners:
NAYS:Commissioners:
ABSENT:Commissioners:
Resolution No. SC 2019-____
Page 2
____________________________________
, Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Florence Picardal, Secretary
Page 2,Item _4__
Meeting Date 2/06/19
The following are roadway segments that are currently posted with a 25 MPH speed limit based
on a past E&TS, which are proposed to maintain the 25 MPH posted speed limit because all of
them—with the exception of Third Avenue which is a business district —are in residence districts
by the definitions in the CVC.
ROAD FROM TO
Davidson Street Broadway Fourth Avenue
Silverado Drive Clubhouse Drive South Greensview Drive
Oleander Avenue Telegraph Canyon Road East Palomar Street
Surrey Drive Allen School Lane eastern terminus
Halecrest Drive Telegraph Canyon Road Douglas Street
Halecrest Drive Douglas Street Lori Lane
Melrose Avenue East Naples Street East Orange Avenue
East "I" Street Hilltop Drive eastern terminus
Buena Vista Way Calle Santiago Buena Vista Court
Hidden Vista Drive Smoky Circle Terra Nova Drive
First Avenue Palomar Street Quintard Street
Paseo Entrada Paseo Ladera Paseo Primavera
Canyon Drive Otay Lakes Road Country Vistas Lane
Third Avenue "E" Street “H” Street
Oleander Avenue East Palomar Street Main Street
This item does not propose any changes to the speed limits, and it only approves the change of
the basis for how the speed limits are set on the above roads ; therefore, there are no changes to
Schedule X of the Register of Schedules maintained at the office of the City Engineer.
FISCAL IMPACT:None.
Attachments:
1.Location Map
J:\Engineer\TRAFFIC\SAFETY COMMISSION\2019\2019-02\Maintain 25 MPH\SC Report MAINTAIN Speed Limit
VARIOUS.docx
Road Segments Proposed for Prima Facie Speed Limit
1-Davidson St (Broadway –Fourth Ave)4-First Ave (Palomar St –Quintard St)7-Surrey Dr (Entire segment)10-Oleander Ave (Telegraph Canyon Rd –E Palomar St)13-Buena Vista Way (Calle Santiago –Buena Vista Ct)
2-Third Ave (E St –H St) [Business District]5-Melrose Ave (E Naples St –E Orange Ave)8-Canyon Dr (Otay Lakes Rd –Country Vistas Ln)11-Oleander Ave (E Palomar St –Main St)14-Silverado Dr (Clubhouse Dr –S Greensview St)
3-E I St (Hilltop Dr –East of Robert Ave)6-Hidden Vista Dr (Smoky Cir –Terra Nova Dr)9-Halecrest Dr (Telegraph Canyon Rd –Lori Ln)12-Paseo Entrada (Paseo Ladera –Paseo Primavera)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
RESOLUTION NO. SC-2019-_____
RESOLUTION OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAINTAINING 25 MPH PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS SEGMENTS
CITYWIDE ON THE BASIS THAT THEY QUALIFY AS
RESIDENCE OR BUSINESS DISTRICTS UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE
WHEREAS,Staff completed a review of roadway segments with an existing posted speed
limit of 25 miles per hour (mph) based on Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) prepared in
accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) that have since expired.
WHEREAS,Section 515 as qualified by Section 240 of the CVC generally defines a
residence district as a road with at least 13 separate dwelling houses on one side within a quarter
mile or at least 16 separate dwelling houses on both sides withi n a quarter mile; and
WHEREAS,Section 235 as qualified by Section 240 of the CVC generally defines a
business district as a road where over a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous
fronting property is occupied by buildings used for business on one side, or over a distance of 300
feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous fronting property is occupied by buildings used for
business on both sides; and
WHEREAS,the following road segments were identified to have existing speed limits of
25 mph and qualify as either a residence district or business district under the aforementioned
definitions in the CVC:
ROAD FROM TO
Davidson Street Broadway Fourth Avenue
Silverado Drive Clubhouse Drive South Greensview Drive
Oleander Avenue Telegraph Canyon Road East Palomar Street
Surrey Drive Allen School Lane eastern terminus
Halecrest Drive Telegraph Canyon Road Douglas Street
Halecrest Drive Douglas Street Lori Lane
Melrose Avenue East Naples Street East Orange Avenue
East "I" Street Hilltop Drive eastern terminus
Buena Vista Way Calle Santiago Buena Vista Court
Hidden Vista Drive Smoky Circle Terra Nova Drive
First Avenue Palomar Street Quintard Street
Paseo Entrada Paseo Ladera Paseo Primavera
Canyon Drive Otay Lakes Road Country Vistas Lane
Third Avenue "E" Street “H” Street
Oleander Avenue East Palomar Street Main Street
all of which are residence districts except for the Third Avenue segment being a business district ;
and
WHEREAS, Section 22352 of the CVC sets a 25 mph prima facie speed limit for
segments that qualify as business or residence districts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Safety Commission of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby maintain 25 mph prima facie speed limits on the following segments on
the basis that they qualify as either business or residence districts under the CVC:
ROAD FROM TO
Davidson Street Broadway Fourth Avenue
Silverado Drive Clubhouse Drive South Greensview Drive
Oleander Avenue Telegraph Canyon Road East Palomar Street
Surrey Drive Allen School Lane eastern terminus
Halecrest Drive Telegraph Canyon Road Douglas Street
Halecrest Drive Douglas Street Lori Lane
Melrose Avenue East Naples Street East Orange Avenue
East "I" Street Hilltop Drive eastern terminus
Buena Vista Way Calle Santiago Buena Vista Court
Hidden Vista Drive Smoky Circle Terra Nova Drive
First Avenue Palomar Street Quintard Street
Paseo Entrada Paseo Ladera Paseo Primavera
Canyon Drive Otay Lakes Road Country Vistas Lane
Third Avenue "E" Street “H” Street
Oleander Avenue East Palomar Street Main Street
PASSED AND APPROVED by the Safety Commission of the City of Chula Vista, California,
this 6th day of February 2019, by the following vote:
AYES:Commissioners:
NAYS:Commissioners:
ABSENT:Commissioners:
____________________________________
Ron Hidinger, Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Florence Picardal, Secretary
Resolution No. SC 2019-____
Page 2
* Combined hazardous & non-hazardous violations (not counting parking citations)
1102
1486
1310 1312
1608
1281 1283
1608
1861
1360 1395
1280
1760
2456
1922 1892
1106 1032
1598 1547
1234
1128
1604
1164
1069
960
70
1354
828 892 867
1340
1249
579
1062
698
1190 1138
1337
1651
1290
985 975 920
687
806
1105
806
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Month
Traffic Citations*
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
A
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
s
Month
Traffic Accidents
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2/1/2019Tr Summary Graphs 020119.xlsx
2/1/2019
1
February 2019
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
2/1/2019
2
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
2/1/2019
3
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
2/1/2019
4
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9
Safety Commission
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
s
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
0
2
-20
1
9