HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 2003-407RESOLUTION NO. 2003-407
RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FEE RECOVERY DISTRICT
FOR OTAY VALLEY ROAD, RELATED TO ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 90-2, TO MODIFY THE METHOD FOR
DETERMINING THE FEES COLLECTED
WHEREAS, on November 16, 1993, Council approved Resolution 17311 establishing a
Fee Recovery District for Otay Valley Road (now known as Main Street); and
WHEREAS, the fee recovery district was established in conjunction with Assessment
District No. 90-2, formed for the financing of the Otay Valley Road improvement and widening;
and
WHEREAS, Council approved the fee recovery district fee in order to aid in a more even
distribution of the cost of the Otay Valley Road improvement and widening based on future land
uses that may develop to a higher traffic generating intensity than industrial or other changes in
land use; and
WHEREAS, fees collected via the fee recovery district shall be used to reduce the costs
to property owners participating in Assessment District No. 90-2 and to pay minor formation and
administrative costs associated with the fee recovery district; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 17311, and therefore collection of the fee recovery district fee, is
in force and effect for the duration of the bond issues for Assessment District No. 90-2; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 17311 provided that Council may modify the fee recovery
district fee based upon sound engineering, financing and planning information; and
WHEREAS, it is now recommended that a modification be made to the calculation of the
fee recovery district fee based on the years remaining on the bond issue to the number of years
bonds were issued determined at the time a land use change is approved; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering recommends the modification as an equitable
application of the fee recovery district fee; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project
for compliance with the Caiifomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and has determined that
the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15273(a)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines,
CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval
of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges by public agencies for the purpose of obtaining funds for
capital projects, necessary to maintain service within existing service areas. Thus, no further
environmental review is necessary at this time.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find,
resolve, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1. That the public hearing at which this resolution was adopted was duly noticed and
held in the manner required by law.
Resolution 2003-407
Page 2
SECTION 2. That the owners of property affected or benefited by collection of the fee recovery
district fee were given the opportunity to give testimony and be heard prior to approval of this
resolution.
SECTION 3. Section 7(a) of Resolution 17311 is hereby by amended in its entirety to read as
follows:
(a)
1. A thoroughfare fee in the amounts set forth in subsection (c) is hereby
established to pay for the Otay Valley Road Improvements and facilities within
the boundary of the fee recovery district ("District"). The fee shall be paid before
the later of the following to occur: (i) approval of any final map; (ii) issuance of a
building permit within the District; or (iii) discretionary approval for a change of
use for a building from an industrial use to any other use.
2. The fees shall be deposited into a District fund, which is hereby created, and
shall be expended only for the purposes set forth in this resolution.
3. The District fund shall be reviewed annually each March 1st. If at least
$20,000 is in the fund, including interest accrued by the District fund, the City
shall cause the fees to be distributed pursuant to subsection (d) during the
subsequent fiscal year. If less than $20,000 is in the fund, the Director of
Engineering may distribute or defer distribution of the fees at his or her discretion
in order to minimize costs of administering the District fund. Upon expiration of
the fund, any remaining balance shall be
SECTION 4. Section 7(c) of Resolution 17311 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:
1. The fee for each development shall be $19,000/industrial acre ($95/trip x 200
trips/acre) or $95/trip as estimated and determined by the Director of Engineering
with reference to industry accepted traffic generation rates (except that, without
regard to industry accepted traffic generation rates, the traffic generation rate for
all industrial land uses shall, for the purposes of imposing this fee, be assumed to
be 200 traffic trips per acre) and applied pursuant to the Modified Engineer's
Report dated November 1, 1993.
2. The fee may be satisfied to the extent of the parcel's participation in
Assessment District No. 90-2, under the authority of Section 66484(0, as
determined by the Director of Engineering, under rules and regulations she/he
may promulgate for the determination of same. Those properties within the
District that develop to a more intense use than outlined by Assessment District
No. 90-2 shall pay this fee pursuant to paragraph 3 below.
3. The amount of the District fee not satisfied by participation in Assessment
District No. 90-2 pursuant to paragraph 2 above, shall be multiplied by the
Multiplier Factor outlined on Exhibit A based upon the date of building permit
issuance (or at the time of discretionary approval if no building permit is
anticipated to be issued, as determined by the Director of Engineering).
4. The City Council shall annually review the amount of the fee. The City
Council may adjust the amount of the fee as necessary to reflect changes in the
Engineering-News Record Construction Index, the type, size, location or cost of
Resolution 2003-407
Page 3
the facilities to be financed by the fee, changes in land use designations in the
City's General Plan, and upon other sound engineering, financ'mg and planning
information. Adjustments to the above fee may be made by resolution amending
the Master Fee Schedule.
SECTION 5. The second Section 7 (Effective Date) of Resolution 17311 is hereby re-numbered
as Section 7.5.
SECTION 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65962, this resolution shall become
effective sixty (60) days after its approval.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
En~frltering Director
City Attorney
Resolution 2003-407
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 16th day of September, 2003, by the following vote:
A'FFEST:
Councilmembers:
Councilmembers:
Councilmembers:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Davis, McCann, Rindone, and Salas
None
Padilla
Susan Bigelow, CMC, City Cll~k
STATE ~ CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF ~2HULA VISTA )
I, Susan Bigel0w, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2003-407 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a
regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 16th day of September, 2003.
Executed this 16th day of September, 2003.
Susan Bigelow, CMC, City Cle'qk
EXHIBIT A
Date of building permit issuance
September 1993 through effective date of
resolution amending Resolution 1731 l
Effective date of resolution amending 0.58
Resolution 17311 through August 2004
September 2004 through August 2005 0.54
September 2005 through August 2006 0.50
September 2006 through August 2007 0.46
September 2007 through August 2008 · 0.42
September 2008 through August 2009 0.38
September 2009 through August 2010 0.33
September 2010 through August 2011 0.29
September 20l 1 through August 2012 0.25
September 20 l 2 through August 2013 0.21
September 20 l 3 through August 2014 0.17
September 20 l 4 through August 2015 0.13
September 2015 through August 2016 0.08
September 2016 through August 2017 0.04
September 20 l 7 and beyond 0.00
Multiplier
Factor
1.00
Years remaining
on bond issues
NA
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
l
0
Note: The table is based on years remaining on the bond issues to total bond issue years
(24 years).