Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 3 - Public Comments 1/2712021 1.20-0540 REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION'S(GMOC's)FISCAL YE... Last Name Email COMMENT#1 Email Address Address City City State PostalCode ................. .......... Zip Code Neighborhood v If you are a human,ignore this field Select a Position: ❑ Oppose ❑ Neutral ❑ Support F .1 1500 of 1500 characters remaining Submit Comment 1 Public Comment Theresa Acerro at January 23,2421 at 3:40pm PST Oppose Drainage:How can you say it is compliant when through out El Nino rain year last year there was street flooding in numerous places- Third and Orange stands out in my neighborhood but elsewhere too.This year is La nina and almost no rain so no drainage problems. Traffic during COVID time is obviously much much better,but this is not typical.and will get worse once this crisis is over because of over building of housing.and poor planning.Olympic Parkway should have been a freeway. meeting standard for parks only in the east should not be considered compliance. Fiscal fantasy that people move every five years to show adequate income prospects for housing is ridiculous unless you have concrete proof of this,I know people do not move hardly at all in my neighborhood. Making people pay monthly for services is obviously necessary for fiscal stability and it is smart that this fee is now being charged in new developments,but I hope it is being explained well to people so they realize what their expenses will be and do not end up with a foreclosure crisis again in the east. This is obviously a very abnormal year since March thanks to COVID 19. ■ Terms and Conditions • Privacy Policy_ • Support t • powered by�RdkLR • C 2021 Granicus https:llchulavista.granicusideas.com/meetings1780-city-council-meeting/agenda—items/600al4acf2b67050cc01 ec51-1-20-0540•review•and-conslderatt... 212 COMMENT#2 Subject: FW:tonights planning commission meeting From:THERESA ACERRo r. _ Sent:Wed nesday,lanuary 27, 20213:45 PM To: Patricia Salvacion<psalvacion@chulavistaca.gov> Subject: Re:tonights planning commission meeting Warning Externa. . Email GMAC: police standard should not just be response time which will be resolved by drone and that they receive 911 directly. Should be that total % of racial identity of all persons stopped or questioned should be equal to that identity's portion of total population. Also Specially trained people should respond to psychiatric (and possibly domestic violence) calls not random officers ( The last 5 or 6 people who died in police custody were people with psychiatric problems.) Also Alpha project or other specially trained people should comprise a homeless out reach team-not police officers. Drainage standard should be no flooding of streets when there is heavy rain. When stream channels are not properly maintained or undergrounded with inadequately sized piping which is the case in western CV. There is flooding of streets when there is heavy rain. This happened last year several times so drainage obviously should not have met standard. Standard needs to reflect reality. Traffic standard needs to reflect the truth of the situation during normal rush hours for Olympic Parkway in particular. To say we meet standard means there is no real standard. A line of cars from 805 all the way out to Otay Ranch does not meet standard of smooth traffic flow. The traffic situation should be acknowledged and building slowed or stopped until it can be resolved. Changing park standard to just the east ignores western Chula Vista -perhaps it should just be a citywide standard. On Wednesday, January 27, 2021, 03:20:25 PM PST, Patricia Salvacion < salvacion chulavistaca. ova wrote: Ms. Acerro, i COMMENT#3 Subject: FW:tonights planning commission meeting From:THERESAACERRo Sent:Wednesday,January 27, 20214:07 PM To: Patricia 5alvacion<psalvacion@chulavistaca.gov> Subject: Re:tonights planning commission meeting Warning:. External Email water could be a big problem also. Commissioners should be aware of this .' :; https://www.youtube.com/watch?y„=„gnEDFOtTReI Investors can now trade water futures tied to CA water index This could threaten our water supply. 3 p S f S