HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1985-12137 Revised 8/12/85
RESOLUTION NO. 12137
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AND WIMMER, YAMADA AND ASSOCIATES TO DEVELOP A
MASTER PLAN FOR SWEETWATER VALLEY PROPERTIES,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista that that certain agreement between THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, and WIMMER, YAMADA
AND ASSOCIATES, to developer a Master Plan for Sweetwater Valley
properties, dated the 13th day of August , 1985, a copy
of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, the same as
though fully set forth herein be, and the same is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to
execute said agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula
Vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $57,500 be, and
the same is hereby appropriated from the unappropriated balance
of the General Fund and placed in Account 600-6000-GF31
Sweetwater Valley Park Redevelopment. Said monies will be
reimbursed from Park Acquisition Funds in the future.
Presented by Appro~as to form by
Manuel A. Mollinedo, Thomas J. Harron, City
Director of Parks and Attorney
Recreation
0636a
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
:HULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of. August
) 85 , by the following vote, to-wit:
,YES: C0uncilmembers Moore, Cox, McCandliss, Scott
'AYES: Counci ] members None
BSTAIN: Councilmembers None
BSENT: Councilmembers Maicoim
City of Chula Vista
City ~ Clerk
rATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)UNTY OF SAN DIEC-.-.-.-~ ) ss.
TY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chulo Vista, California,
) HEREBY CERTIFY that the above ond foregoing is o full, true ond correct copy of
RESOLUTION NO. 12'137
,and that the some has not been omendedor repealed.
TED
(seal) City Clerk
-660
AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 13th day of
August, 1985, by and between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Landscape
Architect WIMMER YAMADA & ASSOCIATES, 516 Fifth Avenue, San
Diego, California 92103, hereinafter referred to as "Architect";
WI T N E S S E T H :
City and Architect agree as follows:
ARTICLE I: THE PROJECT
A. City retains Architect to render professional services for
the Master Plan Study of the property located at:
Sweetwater Valley City Park
ARTICLE II: SERVICES OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Architect shall provide the City with the following services:
A. Ph~;sical Analysis:
The analysis phase shall include investigation into site
( including existing irrigation systems) and regional
conditions affecting Master Plan design. During this phase
a complete topographic survey of the site at 1" = 50' will
be prepared, as well as an aerial photograph.
Products of this phase will be incorporated into the Master
Plan Report.
B. project Pro~ram Development.
The program development phase shall include a series of
meetings with City and community groups (maximum of 4) to
determine goals of the project, needs of the users and the
City and concepts for Master Plan development.
Products and findings of this phase will be compiled into a
Master Plan Program Report (5 copies) to be approved by the
City prior to commencement of Master Plan Design.
Revised 8/13/85
C. Pro~ect Planning and Design:
The project planning phase shall include a series of
meetings (maximum of 4) with the City (and community groups
as deemed necessary not to exceed 4) and work periods by
the Architect to create a Master Plan that satisfies the
requirements set forth in the Master Plan Program Report.
The following will be products of this Phase:
1. A rendered Comprehensive ~4aster Plan at 1" = 50' with
supporting sections and sketches. One rendered and
one reproducible copy will be supplied.
2. A ~4aster Plan Report combining analysis and program
information with the ~.laster Plan concept, design
guidelines for all park elements (including irrigation
systems) and a phasing strategy (including cost
estimates for Phase I only). Fifteen (15) copies of
the report will be delivered to the City. The report
will be xerox quality with plastic spiral binding.
ARTICLE III. FEE AND PA¥14ENT SCHEDULE
A. The fee for services rendered shall be the flat fee amount
of FIFTY SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE ttUNDRED DOLLARS (~57,500.00).
1. Payments shall be made as follows:
Architect shall bill City on a monthly basis. Each
bill shall represent one-third of the fee specified
above and any reimbursable expenses incurred during
the month, pursuant to Paragraph C of this Article.
2. Time of Completion: It is agreed that said project
shall be completed within twelve (12) calendar weeks
per the Landscape Architect's original proposal of
services. This contract shall terminate in six (6)
months if City fails to perform.
B. The above mentioned fees include all costs associated in
obtaining an aerial survey of the site and preparation of
complete topographic survey (at 1" = 50') which would
become the property of the City.
C. Reimbursable Expenses for which the City shall be obligated
in addition to the fee for services rendered are for actual
expenditures made by the Architect and his employees and
consultants in the interest of the project as follows:
-2-
1. Expense of reproductions beyond those outlined
previously and costs for mailing surveys or meeting
notices, unless incurred by the City. Reimbursement
for these expenses shall be at the Architect's actual
cost plus fifteen percent (15%) for handling and
administration.
2. If authorized in advance by the City, expense of
overtime services requiring higher than regular rates.
3. Expense of renderings, models, and mock-ups requested
by the City. Reimbursement for these expenses shall
be at the Architect's actual cost plus fifteen percent
(15%) for handling and administration.
4. Expense of horticultural soils test and percolation
test, if not incurred by the City. Reimbursement for
these expenses shall be at the Architect's actual cost
plus fifteen percent (15%) for handling and
administrationn.
D. No reimbursable expenses shall be allowed unless they have
been approved in advance and in writing by the City.
E. If the City requires the Architect to perform additional
services not covered by this Agreement, the fee for such
additional services shall be the subject of a separate
negotiation with the City at the time those services are
requested.
ARTICLE IV: THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
A. The City shall provide at no cost to the Architect the
following documents, information and services, if available.
1. Title documentation/Quit Claim Deed.
2. Available soils reports.
3. Grading plans and "as-builts" as they become available.
4. Maps and plans for lines of streets, pavements and
adjoining properties, right of way, restrictions,
easements, and other improvements, if any.
5. Maps and plans for utility lines, both public and
private, from San Diego Gas & Electric.
-3-
6. City road maps -present and future in vicinity of
site.
7. As-built maps of existing utilities in the area, if
available.
8. Existing planning studies and reports relative to the
site and region.
9. Information and studies on the operation of park and
recreational facilities presently available to the
City.
10. Guidance in preparing the Master Plan in accordance
with City policies and procedures.
11. Make available upon request to Architect any other
City standards, policies and guidelines normally
available to the public.
12. The City will, in addition, assist Architect in
obtaining data from public or private agencies, as
necessary.
B. Any changes in the Architect's services caused by
inaccurate plans, information, or services furnished by the
City shall be paid for by the City as an additional service.
Co City shall be responsible for assuring that the Architect
has access to the project site for all services covered by
this Agreement.
D. City shall furnish required information and services and
shall render approvals and decisions as expeditiously as
necessary for the orderly progress of the Architect's
services.
E. City shall furnish a project manager from its staff to
assist with this project.
ARTICLE V: OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS
A. Drawings and specifications, as instruments of service, are
and shall remain the property of Architect whether the
project for which they are prepared is executed or not.
City shall be permitted to retain copies, including
reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for
information and reference in connection with City's use and
occupancy of the project. The drawings and specifications
shall not be used by City on other projects, or for
completion of this project by others, provided Architect is
not in default under this Agreement, except by agreement in
writing and with appropriate compensation to the Architect.
B. Submission or distribution of documents to meet official
regulatory requirements, or for other purposes in
connection with the project, is not to be construed as
publication in derogation of the Architect's rights.
ARTICLE VI: MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
principal place of business of the Architect.
B. This Agreement shall be terminated when the Architect
forwards to City the Contractor's Final Application for
Payment, or when the parties hereto agree to termination,
or when termination occurs pursuant to Article VIII,
whichever occurs first.
C. Architect shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from
any and all claims arising from Architect's performance of
this contract.
D. Meetings: The Architect shall meet with the City's
Recreation staff, Park Board, City Council and community
groups a maximum of eight (8) times throughout the project
to conduct workshops or make presentations. City shall
designate those participants to attend said meetings and
shall organize and identify time and place for the
meetings. Additional meetings requested by City shall be
billed as additional services.
ARTICLE VII: SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
A. City and Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their
partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to
the other party to this Agreement and to the partners,
successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such
other party with respect to all covenants of this
Agreement. Neither City nor the Architect shall assign,
sublet, or transfer any interest in this Agreement without
the written consent of the other.
ARTICLE VIII: TERMINATION~ ABANDONMENT OR SUSPENSION
A. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven
days' written notice should either party fail substantially
to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement
through no fault of the party initiating the termination
B. If legal action shall be brought by either of the parties
for breach of terms related to this Agreement, the party
prevailing in said action shall be entitled to recover from
the party not prevailing cost of suit and a reasonable
attorney's fee which shall be fixed by the Court.
C. If City fails to pay promptly all amounts due hereunder to
Architect as and when such amounts become due, the
Architect shall be excused from further performance under
this Agreement until all such amounts are paid. If payment
is not made within a reasonable time after billing by the
Architect, the Architect shall have the right to terminate
this Agreement without prejudice to any other rights the
Architect may have.
ARTICLE IX: INTEREST AND COSTS
A. If City fails to pay the Architect within thirty days of
the date of billing for services rendered and reimbursable
expenses incurred, the Architect shall have the right to
charge interest at thee rate of one percent per month,
commencing at the date of billing, for any unpaid balance
due until such time as payment is made in full by City.
B. City shall pay all legal costs and attorneys' fees
resulting from any legal action required to collect any
amounts which remain unpaid for a period in excess of
ninety days from the date of billing.
~RTICLE X: EXTENT OF AGREEMENT
A. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated
agreement between City and Architect and supersedes all
prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either
written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by
written instrument signed by both City and Architect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Agreement on the day and year first above written.
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
~ Wimmer Yamada & Associates
vM~sY~ of~.~e ~ity of Chula /_~%o~'~h y. y~ da, ~LA
ATT~~ ~~~_/ ~dent ~~
~ ty C~e~ ~
Approved as to form by
Charles R. Gill
Assistant City Attorney
0682a
-6-
The following were respondents to the RFP:
ROGER DEWEESE, INC. & ASSOC. ONA
1302 Camino Del Mar lO1W. Broadway, Ste. 505
Del Mar, CA 92014 San Diego, CA 92101
GERALD GARNER & COMPANY EDAW, INC.
2105 Garnet Avenue 18002 Cowan, Ste. 100
San Diego, CA 92109 Irvine, CA 9~714
KAWASAKI THEILACKER & ASSOC.. PERIDIAN GROUP
3776 4th Avenue 17848 Sky Park Blvd.
San Diego, CA 92103 Irvine, CA 92714
PEKAREK GROUP PHILLIPS BRANDT REDDICK
1501 Morena Blvd. 18012 Sky Park Circle
San Diego, CA 92110 Irvine, CA 92714
STONE FISHER & ASSOCIATES RAPP & FRENCH
1442 Camino Del Mar 415 N. E1 Camino Real
P.O. Box 809 San Clemente, CA 92682
Del Mar, CA 92014
STAN SMITH & ASSOC.
VANDYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 23011 Moulton Parkway, Ste. A-15
3585 5th Avenue Laguna Hills, CA,.92653~
San Diego, CA 92103
INTER-CITY ENGINEERS, INC.
WIMMER YAMADA & ASSOCIATES 7075-A Mission Gorge Rd.
516 5th Avenue San Diego, CA 92120
San Diego, CA 92101
VSP GROUP
ROYSTON, HANAMOTO, ALLEY & ABEY 17801 Cartwright Rd.
225 Miller Avenue Irvine CA 92714
Mill Valley, CA 94942 '
ATTACHMENT A
" CONSULTArlT RATI[.IG S]tEET
''OTAL COST: TOTAL WORK tiOURS: TOTAL SCORE:
FIRH NAHE:
EVALU^TOR:
Please rate the above firm according to each criterion below by circling the appro-
priate score. The numerical scores may be interpreted as foll,qws: 0: unsatisfac-
tory; 1 = below average; 2: average; 3: ab6ve average; 4: outstanding, lhe
"weighted score" should be calculated by multiplying the "weight" times the circled
score. The "final score" is the sum of all "weighted scores." Additional notes br
con~.ents ma& be recorded on the back of this sheet.
Weighted
_. Criteria Score Weight Score Comment
1. General experience and 0 1 ~ 3 4 5 20
knowledge of the firm
relative to the kind of
work requested.
2. Local experience of the 0 1.~ 3 4 5 20
firm including knowledge
of existing data avail-
ab!e, local conditions,
3, Thoroughness of proposed 0 1 2 3 4 5 25
work plan & responsive-
ness to RFP.
Experience of key person- 0 1 2 3 4 5 20
riel assigned to work on
the study.
5. Ab. ility to conduct an 0.1 2 3 .~ 5 15
objective study, free
_ of preconceived biases.
6. On the basis of the sub-
mitted proposal, uould Yes
you feel comfortable with
this finn receiving the No
contract for the work?
FINAL SCORE
ATTACHMENT B
BASIC INTERVIEW QUESTIONS /~ ' ~
Sweetwater Valley Park Master Plan
1. Outline as best you can the steps you believe Should be taken to develop
the basic planning work.
2. Describe the most critical issues of the work as you perceive them.
3. What work does your firm presently haVe Under contract? Would any of this
be in conflict in any way with the proposed project?
4. Is your current workload flexible enough to provide sufficient time for the
project?
5. How long has the firm done recreation and park planning?
6. What experience do you have in working with community groups?
7. Is your firm basically a planning firm, or is planning a division of an
~ architectural or engineering firm?
8. Will you provide advice and procedures for proceeding with the next phase
of planning when the project is completed? What form will this take?
~- 9. Discuss the staffing that you would offer:
A. Who in the firm would be responsible for the work?
B. What other members of the firm would be included in the work project?
C. Would you need any other consultants for Other aspects of the work?
ATTACHMENT B-2