Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020/06/23 Agenda Packet
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Chula Vista in the office of the City Clerk and that I posted the document according to Brown Act requirements. Dated: f0 !B Signed: CITY OF CHULA VISTA a MORAL" • Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor John McCann, Councilmember- District 1 Maria V. Kachadoorian, City Manager Jill M. Galvez, Councilmember- District 2 Glen R. Googins, City Attorney Stephen C. Padilla, Councilmember- District 3 Kerry K. Bigelow, City Clerk Mike Diaz, Councilmember- District 4 Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:00 PM Council Chambers 276 4th Avenue, Building A Chula Vista, CA 91910 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETING JOINTLY WITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Notice is hereby given that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista has called and will convene a Special Meeting of the Housing Authority meeting jointly with the City Council at the time and location stated on this agenda. PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20, AND IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND STAFF MAY PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING VIA TELECONFERENCE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXECUTIVE ORDER, THE PUBLIC MAY VIEW THE MEETING ON TELEVISION AND/OR ONLINE AND NOT IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. HOW TO WATCH. Watch the meeting via livestream at https://chulavista.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx, on AT&T U-verse channel 99(throughout the County), and on Cox Cable channel 24(only in Chula Vista). Recorded meetings are also aired on Wednesdays at 7 p.m. (both channels)and are archived on the City's website. HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS: Visit the online eComment portal for this meeting at: https://chulavista.granicusideas.com/meetings. The commenting period will be open shortly after the agenda is published will remain open through the meeting. All comments will be available to the public and the City Council using the eComment portal. Comments must be received prior to the time the Mayor calls for the close of the commenting period. Comments received after such time will not be considered by the City Council. If you have difficulty or are unable to submit a comment,please contact the City Clerk's Office at cityclerk@chulavistaca.gov or(619) 691-5041. ACCESSIBILITY. Individuals with disabilities are invited to request modifications or accommodations in order to access and/or participate in a City meeting by contacting the City Clerk's Office at cityclerk@chulavistaca.gov or (619) 691-5041 (California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. "'The City of Chula Vista is relying on commercial technology to livestrearn and accept public comments via Granicus, Inc. With the increase of virtual meetings, most platforms are working to scale their systems to meet the new demand. If we have technical difficulties, we will resolve them as quickly as possible. City staff will take all possible measures to ensure a publicly accessible experience. City of Chula Vista Page 1 Printed on 611812020 City Council Agenda June 23,2020 CALL 'TCS ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Diaz, Galvez, McCann, Padilla and Mayor Casillas Sales PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 - 13) The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. If you wish to comment on one of these items, do so at https.-IlChula vista.granicusideas.com/meetings 11. 20-0261 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of November 19, 20191. Recommended Action: Council approve the minutes. 2. 120-0258 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING VARIOUS CHAPTERS OF TITLE 2 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE, TO REVISE BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENT PROCESSES, SPECIFY A PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATE RULES REGARDING MEMBER ASSIGNMENTS WHEN BOARD OR COMMISSION SEAT QUALIFICATIONS CHANGE, ADD PROVISIONS FOR BOARD AND COMMISSION REGULATIONS IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, AND MAKE MINOR CLARIFICATIONS TO RELATED REGULATIONS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) Department: City Clerk Environmental Notice: The activity is, not a "Projekt" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Qu�ality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Recommended Action: Coulncil adopt the ordinance. 3. .20-0092 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. FOR TURN _Y HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS, WASTE AND CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES Department: Economic Development Department City of Chula Vista Page 2 Printed on 611812020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 2 of 768 City Council Agenda June 23,2020 Environmental Notice: The Project qualifies, for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidlellin�es Section 15308 Class 8 (Actions, by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment), Section 15330 Class 30 (Minor Actions to Prevent, Minimize, Stabilize, Mitigate or Eliminate the Release or Threat of Release of Hazardous Waste or Hazardous Substances), and Section 5061(b)(3). Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 20-0233 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY AND NAT'URESCAPE SERVICES, INC. FOR OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE SERVICES IN BID GROUP IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $120,755 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021 Department: Public Works Department Environmental Notice: The Project qualifies, for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines Section 15304 Class 4 (Minor Alterations to ILand)and Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 51. 120-0241 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL, YEAR 2019/20 OTHER GRANTS, FUND, BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $3,000 TO THE ANIMAL CARE FACILITY GRANT FOR UNANTICIPATED GRANTS (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Department: Animal Care Facility Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidlellin�es Section 150601(c)(3) no environmental review is reqluired., Recommended Action: Coulnicil adopt the resol�ution. 6. 120-0245 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF A CARES ACT CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND GRANT ALLOCATION OF $4,842,+ 95 FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE GENERAL FUND, IN FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 AND IN FISCAL YEAR 20,20/21 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Department: Finance Department Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project"' as, defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 150601(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. City of Chula Vista Page 3 Printed on 611812020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 3 of 768 City Council Agenda June 23,2020 7. 120-0250 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR ALL UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES AND ELECTED OFFICIALS, INCLUDING AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY CONTRACT AMENDMENTS TO IMPLEMENT SAID COMPENSATION SUMMARY Department: Human Resources Department Environmental Notice: The activity is, not a "Project as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 8. 20-0251 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM 'THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,636; AMENDING THE FY 2020/2021 CIP PROGRAM BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR; AND APPROVING THE AGREEMENT FOR SHARED STREETS PILOT PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY AND SAN COAG (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Department: Engineering Department Environmental Notice: The activity qualifies for a Statutory Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies). Notwithstanding the foregloing, the project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15061(b)(3 . Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. City of Chula Vista Page 4 Printed on 611812020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 4 of 768 City Council Agenda June 23,2020 9. 120-0203 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUL_A VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2020 REGIONAL ANALYSIS, OF IMPEDIMENTS, TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (AI) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO CERTIFY AND SUBMIT THE Al TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Department: Development Services Department Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378(b)1(5) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 1506o(c 3 Ino environmental review lis required. Under NEPA, the activity qualifies for a Certification of Exemption pursuant to Title 24, Part 58.34(a)(2)&(3) of the Code of Federal Regulations, and pursuant to the U.S. Department of Hous,ing and Urban Development Environmental Guidelines. Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 10. 120-0 29 RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA HOUSING AUTHORITY (1) APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET TO REPROGRAM $250,000 OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUNDS (LMIHAF); (2) APPROPRIATING LMIHAF IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,000. TO A HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID RE-HOUSING PROGRAM IN RESPONSE TO COVID-191; (3) AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ADDING HOMELESS PREVENTION AS AN ELIGIBLE USE USING LMIHAF (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Department: Development Services Department Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines, therefore, pursuant to State Guidlellines Section 150601(c)(3) no environmental review is required., Recommended Action: Authority adopt the resolution. City of Chula Vista Page 5 Printed on 611812020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 5 of 768 City Council Agenda June 23,2020 11. 20-0244 RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of CHULA VISTA, ACTINO AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES S LST ICT NO. 18M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 CLARIFYING AMBIGUITIES IN THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF SUCH .SPECIAL TAX, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (415 VOTE REQUIRED) Department: Development Services Department Environmental Notice: The activity is not a `Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Mate Cuidellines Section 1506o1(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Recommended Action: Council adopt the (resolution. 12 0-0254 RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL OF HE CITY of CHULA 'SISTA AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR, AND RECEIPT OF, LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS Department: Development Services Department Environmental Notice: The activity is not a `Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Mate Cuidellines Section 1506o1(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Recommended Action: Council adopt the (resolution. City of Chula Vista Page 6 Printed on 611812020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6 of 768 City Council Agenda June 23,2020 13. 20-0259 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHUL.A VISTA AMENDING CITY COUNCIL, RESOLUTION . 2019-170 N ORDER TO EXPRESSLY DELEGATE TO THE CITY MANAGER THE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE "DESIGN ASSIST" PURSUANT TO CHU A 'VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SUBSECTION 21-56- 160(H)) "DEVELOPER-PERFORMED PUBLIC WORKS)) WITH RESPECT TO PHASE 1A IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTED, BY RIDA CHU A "VISTA, LLCI IN CONNECTION WITH THE CHU A VISTA BAYFRONT HOTEL AND CONVENTION N CENTER PROJECT Department: development services Department Environmental Notice: The Project was adequately covered in previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report UPD#33355-EIR-553/CH#20050310,77 for the Chula vista Bayfront Master Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the activity also qualifies for an (Exemption pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act state Guidelines. Recommended Action: coulncil adopt the (resolution. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons commenting during Public Comments may address the Council on any subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. state law generally prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff If you wish to comment, you may do so at https.-Ilchula vista.granicusideas.com/meetings 14. 120-02,60 PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED for Jure 23, 2020 PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item(s) have been advertised as public hearing(s) as rewired by law. If you wish to comment on one of these items, you may do so at https.-Ilchula vista.granicusideas.com/meetings 15. 20-0087 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE PTANCE CSF A REPORT REGARDING 2020-2025 CONSOLIDATED PLAN FUNDING PRIORITIES AN 2020/2021 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FUNDING REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ATIO s FCR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Department: development services Department City of Chula Vista Page 7 Printed on 611812020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 7 of 768 City Council Agenda June 23,2020 Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Under NEPA, the activity is exempt pursuant to Title 24,, Part 58.34(a) (2)&(3) of the Code of Federal Regulations and pursuant to the U!.S.. Department of Housing & Urban Development Environmental Guidelines. Recommended Action: Council conduct the public hearing and accept the report. ACTION ITEMS The Item(s) listed in this section of the agenda will be considered individually by the Council and are expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. If you wish to comment on one of these i emr s, you may do so at htips.-Ilchula vista.granicusideas.com/meetings 16. 120-0246 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY LOANS OF UP TO $91,374,810 FROM THE MEASURE A FUND BALANCE TO THE ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT TRANSPORT FUND FOR THE FUNDING OF PHASE 11 DEPLOYMENT STARTUP COSTS ($418811710) AND VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT COSTS ($4,4'93,100), RESPECTIVELY, TO PROVIDE EXCLUSIVE EMERGENCY AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICES WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, THE CITY OF IMPERIAL EACH AND THE BONITA SUNNYSIDE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMENCING ON OR ABOUT APRIL 9, 2021 Department: Fire Department Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project"' as, defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 150601(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORTS COU NCILM EMBERS' COMMENTS CITY ATT'ORNEY'S REPORTS City of Chula Vista Page 8 Printed on 611812020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 8 of 768 City Council Agenda June 23,2020 CLOSED SESSION Announcements of actions taken in Closed Session shall be made available by noon on Wednesday following the Council meeting at the City Attorney's office in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act(Government Code 54957.7). 17. 20-0255 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL CCNU!NSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code, Section 54956.9d)(2) [or] 3 : One [1] Case re Notice of Potential Liability, Request for I nformation, Request for Payment, and Request for Performance of Work Associated with Releases and Threatened Releases of Hazardous Substances at the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge Site in Chula Vista and National City, California. 18. 120-0262 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9d)(2), [or] : One [1] Case. ADJOURNMENT to the regular City Council meeting on July 14, 202Q, at 5.*00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. Materials provided to the City Council related to any open-session item on this agenda are available for public review,please contact the Office of the City Clerk at cityclerk@chulavistaca.gov or( 1 ) +x91-5041 Sign up at www.chulavistaca.gov to receive email notifications when City Council agendas are published online. City of Chula Vista Page 9 Printed on 611812020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 9 of 768 C® of Chula Vista Meetinge Minutes -, Draft Tuesday, (November 19,2019 5:00 RM Council Chambers 276 4th Avenue, (Building A Chula Vista, CA 91910 REGULAR MEETING CSF THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda items may be taken out of order during the meeting. The agenda items at this meeting were considered in the order presented. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 5:00pm. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmember Diaz, Councilmernber Galvez, Councilmember McCann, Deputy Mayor Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas Also Present: City Manager Halbert, City Attorney Googins, City Clerk Bigelow, and Assistant City Clerk Turner PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE Councilmember Galvez led the Pledge of Allegiance. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY A. 191-0520 PRESENTATION AND SPECIAL RECOGNITION OF EASTLAKE CHURCH FOR ITS "I HEART CHULA VISTA" COMMUNITY SERVICE WEEKEND IN THE CITY OF' CHU!LA VISTA Public Works Director Quinlantan gave a presentation on the item. She and Councilmember McCann recognized Eastlake Church. Pastor Freddy Vargas accepted the recognition on behalf of Eastlake Church. B. 191-0539 PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING NOVEMBER 3,0) 2019 AS SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Mayor Casillas Salas read the proclamation. Deputy Mayor Padilla and Councilmember Diaz presented the proclamation to Luanne Hulsizer, representing the Third Ave Village Association, and Lisa Cohen, representing the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce. City of Chula Vista Page 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 10 of 768 City Council Meeting Minutes-IDrarft. November 1 g,201 g CONSENT CALENDAR (items 11 - 3) 1. 1 -0541 A. ORDINANCE NCS. 3467 CCF THE CITY OF' CHULA VISA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.05 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 201 EDITION (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION D. ORDINANCE NO. 3458 CCF THE CITY CCF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL, ODE, 01 EDITION (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION C. ORDINANCE NO. 3469 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.10 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL. CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CGDE, 2019 EDITION (SECONDREADING AND ADOPTION) D. ORDINANCE NO. 3470 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.12 CCF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, 201 EDITION (SECOND READING AND,ADOPTION) E. ORDINANCE NO. 3471 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING CHAPTER 15.14 CCF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING C ODE, 2019 EDITION (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) F. ORDINANCE NO. 3472 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.15 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL IPAL CCOD ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL. CGDE, 20,19, EDITION SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) G. ORDINANCE NO. 3473 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.24 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL IPAL CCOD ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CGDE, 2019 EDITION SECOND READING AND ADOPTION H. ORDINANCE NCS. 3474 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.25 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY (CGDE, 2019 EDITION (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 1. ORDINANCE NCS. 3475 CCF THE CITY CCF CHULA VISA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.25 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CGDE, 20191 EDITION (SECOND City of Chula Vista Page 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet gage].I of 768 City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. November 1 g,,201 g READING AND ADOPTION) J. ORDINANCE NO. 3476 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.38 OF' THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CGDE, 2019 EDITION (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 2. 191-0458 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-210 OF THE, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING, A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE TREE. MAINTENANCE= SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND WEST COAST ARBORIST', INC FOR ADDITIONAL CITY-WIDE TRF MAINTENANCE SERVICES 3. 191-0507 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-211 OF THE CITY" COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS, WAIVING BID IRREGULARITIES, AND AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE COMBINED ADVERTISEMENT OF THE "RMRA MAJOR PA'VEMEN'T REHABILITATION F `CAL YEAR 2018119 (STM0396) AND ""RANG PARD PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS ( K0335)" PROJECTS TO EAGLE PAVING COMPANY INC. Approval of the Consent Calendar ACTION: A motion was made by Councilmember McCann, seconded by Councilmember Diaz, to approve staffs recommendations on the above Consent Calendar items, headings read,text waived.The motion carried by the followings vote: Yes: 5- Diaz, Ga vez, McCann, (Padilla,and Casi las Salas No: 0 Abstain: 0 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR There were none. PUBLIC COMM NTS The fallowing individuals expressed concern regarding the traffic caused by the Soapy Joe's Car wash in the area of Lynwood Dr.. and Bonita Rd.: -Mr. Shinn, Chula Vista resident -Larry Williams, Chula Vista resident, submitted written documentation and he also spoke on behalf of Sue Williams and Steve Balboni -Cliff Bell, Chula Vista resident Steve Hicks, National City resident, spoke in opposition to the Drag Queen Story Time Program. The following members of the public submitted written documentation in opposition to the Drag Queen Story Time program, but declined or were not present to speak- -Tony Mendiola, San Diego resident -Sheila Lu an, Chula Vista resident -Irene Geyer, Chula Vista resident -Trevor Averell City of Chula Vista page 3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 12 of 768 City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. November 19,201 g -Pat Bradley -William Steffy, Chula Vista resident -Eli Komai, San Diego resident -batt lardy -lector Gastelum, Chula Vista resident Sandy Sete, Chula Vista resident, submitted written documentation and declined to speak.. Becky Papp expressed concern regarding youth use of marijuana and she spoke in support of enforcement of marijuana advertising regulations. Adam Sparks, Chula Vista resident, spoke regarding street vendor compliance with health and safety laws. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4 1 �-0385 ORDINANCE OF 'THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 14.18, FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS, TO INCORPORATE VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REVISIONS NECESSARY FOR THE CITY TO REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE, WITH 'THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND REMAIN IN THE NATIONAL FLOOD, INSURANCE OO A (FIRST READING) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice. Mayor Casillas Salas opened the public hearing. There being no members of the public who wished to speak, Mayor Casillas Salas closed the public hearing. ACTION: A motion was made by Councilmember McCann, seconded by Deputy (Mayor Padilla, to place the above ordinance on first reading, heading i read, text waived.The motion carried by the following vete: "yes: 5- Diaz, C alvez, McCann, (Padilla and Casillas Salas INo: 0 Abstain: 0 5. 191-0512 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-212 OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF CHUL.A VISTA TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY OR INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY BY EMINENT' DOMAIN FOR E STREET EXTENSION AND TEMPORARY ACC ESS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND MALL (415 VOTE REQUIRED) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice. Peal Property Manager Ryals gave a presentation on the item. Mayor Casillas Salas opened the public hearing.. Dinah willier, representing SDC' , spoke in opposition to the terms presented and submitted a written statement for the record. City of Chula Vida Page 4 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 13 of 768 City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. November 1 g,201 g City .Attorney Googins, Deputy City .Attorney McDonnell, and Director of ,Economic Development Crockett clarified the findings and answered questions from the Council. There being no further members of the public who wished to speak, Mayor Casillas Salas closed the public hearing. ACTION: A motion was made by C+ouncilmember McCann, seconded by Deputy (Mayor Padilla, to adopt (Resolution No. 2019-212, heading read, text waived. 'The motion carried by the following vote: "des: 5- Diaz, Calvet, McCann, (Padilla and Casillas Salas INo: 0 Abstain: . 191-0440 CONSIDERATION OF DESIGNATING AND SETTING ASIDE CERTAIN CITY-OWNED REAL PROPERTY CURRENTLY KNOWN AS MOSS STREET, ALPINE AVENUE, AND NAPLES STREET FOR FIRE S'TA'TION PURPOSES A. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-213 OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISA DESIGNATING AND SETTING AIDE CERTAIN CITY-OWNED REAL PROPERTY CURRENTLY KNOWN AS MOSS STREET FOR FIRE STATION PURPOSES B. RESOLUTION NO 2019-214 OF THE CITY COUNCIL_ OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGNATING AND SETTING AIDE CERTAIN CITY-OWNED REAL PROPERTY CURRENTLY KNOWN AS ALPINE AVENUE FOR FIRE STATION PURPOSES C. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-215 OF THE CITY COUNCIL L CSF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGNATING AND SETTING ASIDE CERTAIN CITY-OWNED REAL PROPERTY CURRENTLY KNOWN AS NAPLES STREET FOR FIRE STATION PURPOSES D. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-216 OFT E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING, REAL. PROPERTY AGREEMENTS WITH MR. ALDO MORE O, MR. PAUL ARREDONDO, AND SAN DIEGO COUNTRY CLUB, INC. E. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-217 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REMOVAL. OF STOP CONTROL ON THE NAPLES STREET APPROACHES AT THE INTERSECTION O1= NAPLES STREET AND FIRST' AVENUE AND TO ACCORDINGLY AMEND SCHEDULE 11 OF THE REGISTER MAINTAINED IN THE OFFICE O1= THE CITY ENGINEER City of Chula Vista Page 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 14of 768 City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. November 1 g,201 g Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice. Director of Engineering Valle, ,senior Civil Engineer Salsman, Fire Chief Deering, Deputy Fire Chief Peter, Lead Architect Christy Manson from JI A Architecture, and ,senior Civil Engineer Oberbauer gave a presentation on the item.: Staff answered questions from the Council. !Mayor Casillas,alas opened the,public hearing. There being no members of the public who wished to spear, Mayor Casillas ,alas closed the public hearing. Council discussion ensued.. ACTION: A motion was made by Councilmember II iaz, seconded by Councllmember Galvez, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2019-213 through 2019-217, headings read, text waived.The motion carried by the following vote: "yes: 5- Diaz, Galvez, McCann, (Padilla and Casillas Salas INCA: 0 Abstain: 7. 191-0538 CONSOLIDATED PUBLIC, HEARING TO CONSIDER FORMATION OF THE CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT PROJECT SPECIAL, TA, FINANCING DISTRICT AND TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF SUCH DISTRICT AND ASSOCIATED ACTIONS A. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-218 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISA APPROVING AN AMENDED AND RESTATED REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE BAN DIEGO UNIFIED CART DISTRICT (CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT RESORT HOTEL AND, CONVENTION CENTER AND RELATED PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE) B. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-219 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED ORT DISTRICT (CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT PROJECT SPECIAL TAX FINANCING DISTRICT) C. RESOLUTION NO. 2919-229 OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FORMING AND ESTABLISHING THE BAYFRONT PROJECT SPECIAL IAL TAX FINANCING DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL. OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE BAYFRONT PROJECT SPECIAL TAX FINANCING DISTRICT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH DISTRICT City of Chula vista Page 6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 15 of 768 City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. November 19,2019 D. RESOLUTION NO. 2919-221 OFT E CITY COUNCIL L CSF THE CITY OF CHUL.A VISTA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF THE BAYFRONT PROJECT T SPECIAL TAX FINANCING DISTRICT, DEEMING IT NECESSARY TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF' SUCH DISTRICT P. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-222 OF THE CITY COUNCIL L CSF THE CITY OF CULA VISTA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE ISL ATIV BODY OF THE BA FRC NT PROJECT SPECIAL TAX FINANCING DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL. MAIL BALLOT ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS S OF SUCH DISTRICT SEPARATE PROPOSITIONS TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN, TO AUTHORIZE SUCH DISTRICT TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN AND TO ESTABLISH AN APPROPRIATION' LIMIT FOR SUCH DISTRICT Assistant Director of Development ,services Allen gave a presentation on the item. ,the, warren liven, and Elizabeth Alonso, representing the Port of,fan Diego, responded to questions of the Council. ACTION: A motion was made by Gouncillmemlber Galvez, seconded by Gouncillmemlber McGann, to adopt Resolution No. 2019-21 (Item 7A, heading read, text waived. 'The motion carried by the following vote: "Yes: 5- Diaz, Galvez, McCann, (Padilla and Casillas Salas INo: 0 Abstain: !Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice. !Mayor Casillas Salas opened the public hearing. There being no members of the public who wished to speak, Mayor Casillas Salas closed the public hearing. City Clerk Bigelow announced that no protests had been received related to the item. ACTION: A motion was made by Gouncilmember Galvez, seconded by Gouncilmember McGann, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2019-219(Item 713) through 20,19-2,22(Item 7E), headings read,text waived.The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 5- Diaz, Galvez, McGann, (Padilla and Casillas Salas No: 0 Abstain: 0 City of Chula Vista Page 7 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 16 of 768 City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. November 19,2019 ACTION ITEMS . 1 -0502 PRESENTATION ON THE UTILITY UNDERGROU!NDING PROGRAM Director of Engineering Valle,gave a presentation on the item and answered questions of theCouncil. 'ouncilmernber Galvez spoke in support of prioritizing projects in District 2. Mayor Casillas Salas suggested taking various factors into consideration when reprioritizing projects and offered a workshop to identify priorities. City!Manager Halbert stated that funds could only be used on eligible streets. Deputy Mayor Padilla requested information on the types and capacities of certain lines and he also requested an update regarding working with developers to either leverage financing or apply financing derived from revenues associated with the Bayfront development. 'ouncilmember Diaz spoke in support of prioritizing undergrounding the poles on the west side of Chula Vista. Council discussion ensued. 9�. 1 �-046 A. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT FOR_ THE QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 201 B. RESOLUTION N NCS. 2019-223 OF THE CITY COUNCIL L CSF THE CITY OF C HULA VISTA MAKING VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 BUDGET TO ADJUST FOR VARIANCES AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED C. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-224 OF THE, CITY COUNCIL L CSF THE CITY OF CHUL.A VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL. YEAR 2019/20 CHIP PROGRAM BUDGET BY ESTABLISHING A NEVA` CIP PROJECT, `W 0317 "BAYFRONT RV LLC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS'"; AND APPROPRIATING $390,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE SEWER INCOME FUND TO SWR 17 THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REC U!I R_ D Finance Director Bilby and Budget&Analysis Manager Prendell gave a presentation on the item. ACTION: A motion was made by Councilmember McGann, seconded by Deputy (Mayor Padilla, to accept the report, and adopt Resolution Nos. 2019-223 and 2019-224, headings read,text waived.The motion carried by the following vote: "Yes: 5- Diaz, Ga vez, McCann, (Padilla and Casi las Salas No: 0 Abstain: 0 City of Chula Vista Page g 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 17 of 768 City Council Meeting Minutes-IDrarft. November 1 g,201 g CITY MANAGER'S REPORT'S Marketing & Communications Manger Steinberger reported that the City of Chula Vista is the first city in the Mete of California to be certified as a Welcoming City. MAYOR'S REPORTS Mayor Casillas Salas reported on hosting the MANA de San Diego event with National City Mayor Alejandra Sotelo--Solis, as well as representatives from Assemblywoman Lorena Conzalez's Office and Congressman Juan Vargas' Office in the Council Chambers. She congratulated the new Citizens" Police Academy graduates and commended the Chula Vista Police Department. C O NC►ILM M ER,S' COMMENTS NTS Councilmember McCann spoke regarding his tour of the new tower at Sharp Chula Vista with the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce and thanked Sharp for investing in the community. Deputy Mayor Padilla reported his attendance at the Chula Vista Veteran's Day Memorial Bowl and the opening of Sesame Place. He thanked the City of Chula Vista employees. Councilmember Diaz spoke on the illegal cannabis businesses in Chula Vista. Council discussion ensued. Councilmember C'alvez supported the permitted cannabis businesses using their legal recourse to address the illegal cannabis businesses. At the request of Councilmember Diaz and Mayor Casillas Salas there was consensus of the Council to direct staff to investigate adding staff to the City Attorney's Office and the Special Investigations Unit to address the illegal cannabis businesses. Councilmember Calvez reported on her attendance at the Chula Vista's Library reveal of the Bayfront "arbor Park and Sweetwater Park and expressed her excitement. She congratulated the Welcoming Cities subcommittee on their acknowledgement. She also spoke on the upcoming ribbon cutting at the San Ysidro Port of Entry and wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS City Attorney Coogins informed the Council of the upcoming Measure A meeting at which there would be a proposal for funding of the Paralegal and Investigator positions identified for the Neighborhood Protection Unit to assist in prosecuting the illegal cannabis businesses. 10. 1 -051 " REPORT ON STATE LAIN SB 922 SUPPORTING PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS) AND CULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER TER 2.59, "FAIR AND OPEN COMPETITION IN CONTRACTING 11 PROHIBITING PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS, AND POSSIBLE BALLOT INITIATIVE OPTIONS TO ADDRESS LEGAL INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE TWO City Attorney Coogins gave a presentation on the item. Council discussion ensued. Hector C`astelum, representing the Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction, spoke in opposition to City of Chula Vida page 9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 18 of 768 City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. November 1 g,201 g the Council placing an item on the ballot. Council discussion ensued.. ACTION: A motion was made by Maar Casillas Salas, seconded by Councilmember Galvez, to direct the Mayor, ICDeputy Mayor Padilla and City Attorney Uoogins to draft a Iballot measure that: eliminates any inconsistencies between state law and CVMC 2.59, removes ambiguities about the City''s ability to access state infrastructure funds, restores the City's discretion over the use of project labor agreements, contains all the taxpayer's protections, state laws, and other Ibest practices, and includes (language about penalties and transparency. The motion was carried by the following vote: Yes: 4- Diaz, Calvet, Padilla and Casillas Salas INo: 1 - McCann Abstain: CLOSED SESSION City Attorney Coogins announced that the Council would convene in closed session to discuss Item 11. Mayor Casillas Salas recessed the meeting at 8:15 p.m. The, Council reconvened in closed session at 8:22"p.m. with all members present. Pursuant to Resolution No. 13706 and Council Policy No. 345-03, Official (Minutes and records of action talon during Closed Sessions are maintained by the City Attorney. 11. 19.0544 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54955.8 Property- Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 543-050-57'-00 1755-55 Millenia Avenue, Chula 'Vista, CA 91915 Agency Negotiators: Gary Halbert and Eric Crockett Negotiating Parties: City of Chula Vista and Chesnut Properties Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Acquisition ACTION: No reportable action. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m.. Minutes prepared by.Leah Larrarte, Deputy City Clerk Kerry K. igelow, MMC, City Clerk City of Chula vista Osage 10 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 19 of 768 zmr, ..' l IN III til v r :a C1TY' C,0UNC'1LSTIA, ""EMENT CITY, OF CHUIAVISTA r l 1 June 23,2020 File IU: 19-03 20-0258 TITLE ORDINANCE of THE CITY of CH LA VISTA AMENDING VARIOUS CHAPTERS OF' TITLE 2 of THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE BOARD ANIS COMMISSION APPOINTMENT PROCESSES, SPECIFY A. PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATE RULES REGARDING MEMBER ASSIGNMENTS WHEN BOARD OR COMMISSION SEAT QUALIFICATIONS CHANGE, ADD PROVISIONS FOR BOARD AND COMMISSION REGULATIONS IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, AND MADE MINOR CLARIFICATIONS To RELATED REGULATIONS (SECOND, READING AND ADOPTION) ACTIONRECOMMENDED " Council adopt the ordinance. SUMMARY Adoption of the ordinance would revise the appointment processes for specified board and commission seats in order to streamline the appointment processes, consolidate and better define rules regarding member seat assignments when changes are made to a seat's qualifications or,district boundaries,add provisions for board and commission operations during,emergencies,and clarify other related provisions. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director ofDevelopment Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance witthe California Environmental Quality pct CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CE( A Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment, therefore, pursuant to Section 150 o(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines,the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus,no environmental review is required. DISCUSSION Background In response to past referrals and feedback from the City Council, as well as continued efforts to streamline processes related to boards and commissions, staff is recommending changes to some processes related to City boards and commissions.The proposed changes include restructuring certain sections of Chapter 2.25, "General Rules for Boards and Commissions," adding sections to streamline appointment processes and addressing situations in which seated members no longer qualify for their seats,due to revisions to the seat qualifications and in anticipation of future redistricting.The new processes will result in faster appointments to lessen disruption on boards and commissions as they wait for a member to be appointed, as well as conserve time and resources. Provisions are also added to address board and commission operations i emergencies. APPOINTMENT PROCESSES Changes proposed in the ordinance include restructuring the "Membership - Applications, Interview, nomination and appointment Process'section..in.Chapter 2.25 General Rules for Boards and Commissions to 1 . 0 0 1 P Ii1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 20 of 768 separate membership rules from board and commission appointment processes;thus adding a"Membership Appointment Processes'I section to define and streamline commission appointment processes. Currently, six commissions have one or more seats that are filled through a process requiring interviews by the full City Council.The steps in the current process are: L Identify the vacant position,set application 5. Contact all applicants with nomination results deadline,and update webpages 6. Schedule a special City Council meeting or Z. Contact current applicants to confirm interest meetings to conduct interviews 3. Collect new or revised applications and 7. Schedule applicants for interviews materials 8. Conduct interviews at special City Council 4. Schedule City Council agenda item to conduct meeting nominations 9. Contact all interviewed applicants with results The proposed ordinance has organized the boards and commissions appointment processes into the following categories: General, Full Council Interview, District-Based, Designated Members, and Other. Proposed appointment processes are described below in Table 1: Table 1-Appoi"ntment Process Types and Descri'ptions Appointment Process Category Nominating Authority&Appointment* A. General Appointment Process Mayor conducts interviews and makes nominations to fill vacancies; Cit Council ratifies the appointments B. Full Council interview Appointment The full City Council interviews applicants and makes the Process appointments C. District-Based Appointment Process Councilmember for a specified district interviews and makes nominations; City Council ratifies the appointments D. Desijznated Member Appointment Specified Nominating Authority submits nominees for consideration, Process Mayor conducts interviews and makes nomination; City Council ratifies the appointments *App o in tm en ts are sub ect to at least Three affirm a tive votes of the City Council.. CVMC 2.25.050(j) Further,the ordinance proposes moving special or combined appointment processes that apply only to one board or commission,such as the processes used for the Board of Ethics and the Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission, from the General Rules section (CVMC 2.25) to the membership section of the Municipal Code for the specific board or commission for clarity. A detailed summary of changes specific to each board and commission is provided on the following pages. P 12 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 21 of 768 PROPOSED BOARDS,&COMMISSIONS APPOINTMENT PROCESS CHANGES BOARD/ # OF SEATS, CURRENT APPOINTMENT PROPOSED APPOINTMENT PROCESS NOTES COMMISSION AFFECTED PROCESS ............... ............... Civil Service 2 Two(2)members are interviewed Process A-General Remaining seats will continue to be appointed by Commission and appointed by full Council The two members would be nominated by Council from a list of candidates nominated by the (CVMC 2.43.050) Mayor;appointments ratified by full Council Commission(one seat)and Classified Employees (CVMC 2.25.052( )) (two seats). Appointment process has been moved from CVMC Chapter 2.25(General Rules chapter)to the Civil Service Commission chapter. Measure A- 12 Eight(8)Designated members Process D-Designated Member Appointment processes have been added to the Citizens' nominated by specified Nominating The eight(8)Designated members would be Measure A COC chapter. Oversight Authorities;interviewed and nominated by specified Nominating Authorities, Committee appointed by full Council interviewed and nominated by Mayor,ratified by full Council (CVMC 2.25.052(D)) Four(4)At-Large members Process C-District-Based representing each District The four(4)At-Large members would be nominated and appointed by full selected and nominated by corresponding Council District Councilme,mber,ratified by full Council (CVMC 2. 3.060) (CVMC 2.25.052(0) Measure P- 16 Eleven(11)Designated members Process D-Designated Member Appointment processes have been added to Citizens' nominated by specified Nominating The eleven(11)Designated members would be Measure P COC chapter. Oversight Authorities,interviewed and nominated by the specified Nominating Committee appointed by full Council Authorities,interviewed and nominated by Mayor,ratified by full Council (CVMC 2.25.052(D)) Four(4)At-Large members Process C-District-Based representing each district The four(4)At-,Large members would be nominated and appointed by full nominated by corresponding District Council Councilmember,ratified by full Council (CVMC 2.25.052(Q) One(1)At-Large member Process A-General representing any of the four The one(1)At-Large member representing any districts,nominated and appointed of the four districts would be nominated by by full Council Mayor,ratified by full Council (CVMC 2.61.060) (CVMC 2.25.052(A)) LN 3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 22 of 768 BOARD/ # OF SEATS, CURRENT APPOINTMENT PROPOSED APPOINTMENT PROCESS NOTES COMMISSION AFFECTED PROCESS ............... Healthy Chula 4 • Four(4)District seats nominated Process C-District-Based Appointment process has been moved to Vista Advisory by the Mayor after the Mayor The four(4)District seats would be nominated The Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission Commission consults with and receives a by the corresponding District Councilmember, chapter. recommendation from the ratified by full Council Councilmembers representing the (CVMC 2.25.052(Q) Council District (CVMC 2.47.040) Parks& 7 Seven(7)members appointed At- Process C-District-Based Four seats would need to be designated as Recreation Large by full Council Four(4)members would be nominated by the District Representatives;designation procedures Commission (CVMC2.41.040) corresponding District Councilmembers,ratified are also proposed in the ordinance. by the full Council (CVMC 2.25.052(Q) Appointment process has been moved to the Parks&Recreation Commission chapter. Process A-General Three(3)members would be nominated by Repetitive Charter language removed from CVMC Mayor,ratified by the full Council chapter 2.41;will remain in Article VI of the (CVMC 2.25.052(A)) Charter. Cultural Arts 0 N/A-No changes proposed. No change. Recommended change consists only of moving Commission the appointment process description from the General Rules chapter of the Municipal Code to the Cultural Arts Commission chapter. Mobilehome Rent 0 N/A-No changes proposed. No change. Recommended change consists only of moving Review the appointment process description from the Commission General Rules chapter of the Municipal Code to the Mobilehome Rent Review Commission chapter. Board of Ethics 0 N/A-No changes proposed. No change. Recommended change consists only of moving the appointment process description from the General Rules chapter of the Municipal Code to the Board of Ethics chapter. Growth 0 N/A-No changes proposed. No change. Recommended change consists only of adding the Management appointment process to the Growth Management Oversight Oversight Commission chapter. Commission Planning 0 N/A-No changes proposed No change. Recommended change consists only of adding the Commission appointment process to the Planning Commission chapter and removing repetitive language stated in the Charter. LN 3 g 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 23 of 768 PROCESS,FOR ASSIGNING SEATS WHENQUALIFICATIONS CHANGE The proposed ordinance would also add a section in Chula Vista Municipal Code chapter 2.2,5 that specifies a process by which the City Clerk would recommend to the City Council revised seat assignments when changes are made,to a board or commission's seat qualifications or when redistricting occurs. Changes to a seat's qualifications could include the following: At-large seats being revised to include professional or other experience requirements, Seats changed from at-large to district-based, and Redistricting occurring,which may result in one or more members no longer living in the district they were appointed to represent. In these scenarios, existing members may not meet the new qualifications of the seat. In these cases,the City Clerk would propose revised assignments of the seated members to the new seats and would make a recommendation for City Council approval. The City Clerk would propose revised seat assignments with the intent of causing the least disruption and movement of members. Reassigned members would retain the term date, they were originally assigned; reassignment would not extend, nor reduce, a member's term, and would not allow a member to serve more consecutive terms than the member would otherwise be entitled to serve. Members who are reassigned to a seat for which they do not qualify would be entitled to serve out the remainder of their term, with a qualified replacement being appointed for the succeeding term. Currently, the Measure A and P Citizens" Oversight Committees have provisions related to redistricting (CVMC 2.61.050(D), and CVMC 2.63.01501(l)), respectively). The proposed ordinance would consolidate this provision into the general rules for boards and commissions, so that it would extend to applying to all applicable boards and commissions. OPERATIONS IN EMERGENCIES The proposed ordinance introduces provisions during declared public emergency situations that would allow the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney and City Clerk,to temporarily revise or suspend requirements related to boards and commissions,such as meeting frequencies and activities deadlines. For example,in the current COVID-,19 pandemic,boards and commissions are unable to hold meetings in the frequencies specified and cannot complete reports of activities by the deadline prescribed in the Municipal Code. OTHER CLARIFICATIONS The ordinance also makes minor revisions to two sections to clarify the number of members required to be seated in order for a board or commission to take action and the locations in which meetings may be held. DECISION,MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations 'Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for, purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Govt Code § 87100, et seq.). staff'is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Councilmember, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURREN"Ir-YE,AR FISCAL IMPACT While there is no direct impact to the current-year budget, adoption of the ordinance would result in resource savings for several of the affected processes. For example,the proposed ordinance recommends changing the Parks and Recreation Commission appointment process from the Full Council Appointment Process to the General & District used appointment process (Mayoral and Councilmember nomination,with final appointment approval by the full Council). An appointment process breakdown and staff cost estimate for those appointment processes are provided on the following page. P 5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 24 of 768 Appointment Process Breakdown-Per Seat Filled Hours Approximate A A M --------------------- Representative Cost Full-Council Appointment Process City Clerk 4 Review cif age,nda items,preparationfor interviews,Council meetingsfor nominations&interviews City Clerk Staff 18.5 Review of vacancy,news release and website update,contacting current applicants, processing new applications/resumes, preparing nomination materials,creating nomination and interview agenda items, schedule interviews for applicants, prepare Council meeting materials for interviews,contacting applicants with results, Council meetings for interviews Mayor/Council is Review of applications and resumes, Council meetings for nominations &interviews Mayor/Council Staf Review and discussion of applications,and resumes 5 'Total 42.5 $4278 General&District-Based Appointment Processes City Clerk Staff 2 Review of vacancy, prepare materials for review, create ratification agenda item Mayor/Council 1.9 Review of applications and resumes,interview applicants Mayor/Council Staff 1.9 Review of applications and resumes, interview applicants, memo preparation Total 5.8 $539 Staffsalaries are based on the 2020 Fully Burdened Rate of each position. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no hard cost in adopting the proposed ordinance. If adopted, the ordinance would provide considerable efficiencies. The chart below compares the estimated staff time cost to fill vacancies on the Parks and Recreation Commission from 2015-2019 to the estimated staff cost of the proposed General & District Based Appointment Processes. The Parks and Recreation Commission is used because it is an established commission with average turnover. Board/Commission Current Proposed Savings Process Process Parks and Recreation $2S)668 $3,234 $22J34 F Commission ATTACHMENTS li. Ordinance- Redline version 2. Affected B&C Rosters Staff Contact:Kerry Bigelow, City Clerk, and Leah Larrarte,,Deputy City Clerk P �3ge 6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 25 of 768 S ECOND READING AND ADOPTION ORDINANCE No. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING VARIOUS CHAPTERS OF TITLE 2 OF THE C ULA VISTA. MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE BOARD AN COMMISSION APPOINTMENT PROCESSES, SPECIFY A PROCESS ANIS CONSOLIDATE RULES REGARDING MEMBER ASSIGNMENTS WHEN BOARD OR COMMISSION SEAT QUALIFICATIONS CHANGE, ADD PROVISIONS FOR BOARS AND COMMISSION REGULATIONS IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, AND MATT MINOR CLARIFICATIONS TO RELATE REGULATIONS WHEREAS, in 2008, the Council adopted Ordinance 3111, which added Chula Vista Municipal Code chapter 2.25, General Rules for Boards and Commissions, and consolidated prior rules and regulations that had been contained in the Municipal Code, City Charter, Council. policies, and City Council minutes; and WHEREAS, in 2011 and 2018, the Council adopted Ordinances 3211, 3212, 3213, and 3435 to remove additional redundant and inconsistent rules from each of the chapters of the Municipal Code, codify rules for the City's charter-created boards and commissions, and update established meeting schedules; and WHEREAS, furter revisions to the rules governing appointment processes for the City's boards and commissions are necessary in response to referrals from the City Council, as well as a desire to streamline processes and furter reduce redundancies and inconsistencies among the City's Municipal Code and Charter;.. and WHEREAS, the City Council may revise seat requirements for boards and commissions when necessitated by changing practices or situations, such as Ordinance 34,35 which converted seats on the Growth Management Oversight Commission from seats determined by specified geographical boundaries to the boundaries matching the established City Council districts; and WHEREAS, seated members, who met the qualifications when initially seated, may or may not qualify under new requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish procedures for the City Clerk to follow to address these scenarios that is both equitable and avoids disruption of the board or commission to the extent possible; and WHEREAS, both the pleasure P Citizens' Oversight Committee and Measure A Citizens' Oversight Committee currently have provisions related to redistricting, which the Council desires to consolidate with thegeneral rules for boards and commissions; and C:1Usersl.legistar\AppData\Local\Ternp\B+ L Technologies leasyPDF 81(�,B+CLC64 (1L51061�,'IBCL(4 OE5106.docx. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 26 of 768 Ordinance Page 2 WHEREAS, in the current COVID19 pandemic, due to nationwide stay-at-home orders, various requirements related to boards and commissions cannot be met, including meeting frequency and deadlines for reports; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to enact provisions to allow the City Manager, after consulting with the City Attorney and City Clerk, to waive these requirements during a declared emergency; and WHEREAS, the City Council also desires to make minor clarifications to the Definitions section of the General Rules of Boards and Commissions to clarify the number of voting members who must be seated in order for a board or commission to take action; and WHEREASI the City Council also desires to clarify that boards and commissions may hold meetings from time to time in locations outside of the City, in accordance with state and local laws. NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: Section T. Various chapters of Title 2 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code are hereby amended as follows: /Sections in Chapter 2 not listed below remain unchanged.] Chapter 2.25 - GENERAL RULES FOR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS [Sections 2.2'5.010 remains unchanged.1 2.25.020 Definitions. [Only the below definition,is revised, as indicated;all other definitions remain unchanged.] "Entire voting membership" or "entire membership" means those individuals who have been appointed to, have been sworn in to serve on, have not been removed from., have not vacated their seat on., and who are eligible and entitled to vote as members of a board or commission. It does not include ex officio members and does not include any seat specified in the Charter provision or ordinance creating the board or commission that is unfilled due to a vacancy, pursuant to CVMC 2.25.105. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at least one-half of the voting seats specified in the Charter provision or ordinance creating the board or commission must be filled in order for the board or commission to act. For example, if a seven-member board has two vacancies, the remaining five voting members constitute the "entire membership." Accordingly, an action that requires a majority vote could be taken. if at least three of the voting board members vote in its favor. The City Council intends that this definition clarify the term"entire membership"as used in Section 603 of the City Charter. [Sections 2.25.030 remains unchanged.] 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 27 of 768 Ordinance Page 3 2.25.035 Membership — Changes to Seat Qualifications. A. If changes are made to the qualifications for one or more seats on a board or commission, including redistricting having occurred, seats being changed from at-large to district-based, qualifications being changed for a seat, or a similar event, the City Clerk shall recommend to the City Council for approval the assignments of the seated members to the seats,, with the intent of reducing disruption to the board or commission, to the extent possible. B. When a member is reassigned, the member shall retain the term dates they were originally assigned. Reassigning a seat shall not extend a term or allow a member to serve more consecutive terms than the member would otherwise be entitled to serve. C. Notwithstanding subsection A, above, if a member does not qualify under the new requirements for the seat to which the member has been assigned, the member nonetheless shall be entitled to serve out the remainder of the member's term, with a qualified replacement to be appointed and seated for the succeeding term. [Sections 2.25.040 remains unchanged.1 2.25.050 Membership —Applications and Appointments — General A. The City Clerk shall maintain applications for prospective membership on boards and commissions for a period of one year from the date of application. The application shall provide a place for an individual to state the reasons he or she seeks appointment to a particular board or commission and his or her qualifications for service on a particular board or commission. B. An individual who has submitted an application for appointment as a voting or ex officio member of any board or commission may be interviewed as part of the nomination and selection process. C. If a vacancy occurs on, any board or commission within one year of interviews being conducted for that board or commission, interviews are not required if all of the following criteria are met: (1) the vacancy was properly noticed and new applications solicited; (2) no new, qualified applications were received; (3) one or more qualified applicants from the original interviews remain eligible and interested in being appointed; and (4)the appointment process for the board or commission.does not specifically prohibit this subsection. D. Members of each board and commissionshall be appointed by at least three affirmative votes of the City Council. 2.25.052 Membership —Appointment Processes Processes described in this section apply to seats on one or more boards or commissions, as indicated in the board or commission chapter within this code. If no appointment process is specified for a board or commission, the General Appointment Process in subsection (A),,below,will apply. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 28 of 768 Ordinance Page 4 A. General Appointment Process. When a vacancy occurs, the City Clerk shall forward applications received for the vacant position to the Mayor,who shall review the forwarded applications, select applicants to be interviewed'. Interview selected applicants, and make nominations for appointment, subject to the City Council's approval. B. Full Council Interview Appointment Process. When a vacancy occurs, members shall be appointed in accordance with Chapter 2.53 CVMC. C. District Based Appointment Process. Seats on applicable boards and commissions, for which this process applies are tied to a particular Council district seat. When a vacancy occurs, the City Clerk shall forward applications to the Councilmember filling the corresponding district seat. The Councilmember shall review the applications, select applicants to be interviewed, Interview selected applicants, and make nominations for appointment, subject to the City Council's approval. D. Designated Member Appointment Process, 1. When a vacancy occurs, designated members shall be selected for nomination by the Nominating Authorities specified in the applicable Commission section in accordance with policies and procedures that each Nominating Authority establishes for itself Up to three nominees may be presented for consideration. If any of the listed Nominating Authorities decline to exercise their nominating authority in a timely fashion, or if any ceases to function or exist, that party's nominating authority shall pass to a substantially similar organization selected by the City Council. 2. Nominating Authorities shall submit the names and contact information for their nominee(s) ("Designated Nominees") to the City Clerk on a form prescribed by the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall provide the Designated Nominees with instructions to complete and submit applications to the City Clerk within a specified time period. Completed applications timely received by the City Clerk shall be forwarded to the Mayor. 3. The Mayor shall Interview all Designated Nominees who timely completed applications, and make nominations for appointment, subject to the City Council's approval. 4. If a Nominating Authority presents the Mayor with two or three nominees for consideration, and those nominees properly apply, the Mayor shall make the nomination by choosing among the two or three nominees presented. If a Nominating Authority presents the Mayor with only one nominee,the Mayor may reject such nomination and request an alternative submittal. Once rejected, a nominee may not be re-submitted for the term at issue, but may be submitted for consideration for future terms. E. Administration. The City Clerk shall administer the appointment processes set forth above, including the development and publication of all necessary forms. The City Clerk shall have the authority to develop additional administrative policies and procedures to the extent necessary to implement the terms of this chapter and other chapters within this code related to board and commission appointments. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 29 of 768 Ordinance Page 5 (Ord. 3449§ 1,2019;Ord.3435 § 1,2018;Ord.3393 § 1,2016;Ord.3370§2,2016;Ord.3253 § 1,2013;Ord.3213 § 1,2011; Ord.3111 § 1,2008). 2.25.055 Membership —Reappointment process. A. In the year of the expiration of a member's term, unless otherwise requested by the nominating authority for the particular board or commission seat, the City Clerk shall schedule the reappointments for eligible and interested members at a meeting of the City Council in July, or as soon as practicable thereafter, for all boards and commissions. B. Prior to reappointment, if a majority of the City Council so desires, the Mayor and, City Council may Interview members who are interested in and eligible to be reappointed, whose seats would be otherwise be appointed using the Full Council Interview Appointment Process described in CVMC 2.25.052(B,). Following the interviews,the Mayor and City Council shall vote whether or not to reappoint the incumbents. C. Regardless of the applicable reappointment process, each member of a board or commission shall be reappointed by at least three affirmative votes of the City Council. When an incumbent is not reappointed, the seat shall be filled using the applicable appointment process. (Ord.3435 § 1,2018;Ord.3366§ 1,2016). [Sections 2.25.060 through 2.25.080 remain unchanged.] 2.25.085 Emergency Operations. During a period of public emergency, as declared in a proclamation of a local emergency,requirements related to boards and commissions described in this code, including frequency of meetings and specified activity deadlines, may be temporarily revised or suspended in the discretion of the City Manager, after consultation with the City Attorney and City Clerk. 2.2 .100 Membership — Terms —Filling unexpired terms. Member terms shall be in accordance with Chula Vista Charter Section 602 and this section: A. A voting member who currently sits on a particular board or commissionmay not be appointed to fill the unexpired term of another voting member's vacated seat on. that same board or commission. An individual who currently sits as an ex officio member of a board or commission may be appointed to fill the unexpired term of a voting member's vacated seat on the same board or commission if the ex officio member meets the eligibility criteria for voting membership. The appointment process shall be the same as provided for in the applicable membership section for the board or commission. B. For purposes of determining whether the unexpired term of a vacated seat is less than, more than, or equals two years,, the starting date of the unexpired term shall be the date the new appointee takes the oath of office, and the end date of the unexpired term shall be the expiration date of the vacating member's to of office. (Ord.3435 § 1,2018;Ord.3213 § 1,2011;Ord.3111 § 1,20O8). [Sections 2.25.105 through 2'.25.190 remain unchanged.] 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 30 of 768 Ordinance Page 6 2.25.200 Operations — Regular meetings required— Special meetings allowed — Time and location to be established by resolution— Brown Act requirements. [Only subsection(D)is revised, as indicated;all other subsections remain unchanged] D. As a general rule, boards and commissions shall hold their regular and special meetings at a City facility. Boards and commissions may hold their meetings from time to time in other locations, as long as meetings are properly noticed and held in accordance with state and local laws. [Sectiones 2.25.205 through 2.25.300 remain unchanged.] Chapter 2.28 BOARD OF ETHICS* /Sections 2.2'8.010 through 2.28.040 remain unchanged.] 2.28.050 Membership. A. The Board of Ethics shall be composed of seven members, to be nominated and appointed in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC,and this chapter. 1. When a vacancy occurs, the City Clerk shall forward applications for membership on the Board of Ethics for review by a panel. consisting of one Charter Review Commission member appointed by the Charter Review Commission and one Board of Ethics member appointed by the Board of Ethics. The panel shall review the applications, select applicants to be interviewed, Interview selected applicants, and recommend(by unanimous decision of the panel) one applicant for each available seat to the City Council,for appointment. 2. If the panel is unable to reach a unanimous decision, the panel shall notify the City Clerk, so that additional applications may be considered. 3. Irregularities in this interview process may be brought to the attention of the City Council. [Subsections 2.28.050(B)through (D), and sections 2.28.060 through 2.28.170 remain unchanged.] 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 31 of 768 urdinance Page 7 Chapter 2.31 MOBIL. HOME RENT REVIEW COMMISSION [Sections 2.31.010 through 2.31.030 remain unchanged.] 2.3 1.040 Membership. A. The Commission shall consist of five voting members and up to two ex officio,members, to be nominated and appointed in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC,and this,chapter. 1. All ex officio members and one voting member shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with the General Appointment Process specified in 2.25.052(A). 2. The four remaining seats are nominated by a particular Council district seat and do not require the member to reside in the specified district. All four seats shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with the District Based Appointment Process specified in 2.25.052(C). B. The members shall be appointed in accordance with subsection CA)of this section and as follows: 1. No member shall own or be a tenant in a mobilehome park. 2. One ex officio, member shall be a tenant in a mobilehome park within the City at the time of appointment and throughout the member's term. 3. One ex officio member shall be an owner of a mobilehome park within the City at the time of appointment and throughout the member's term. (Ord. 3211 § 5,201.1;Ord.28+ 4,2000;Ord.2502 §3, 1992;Ord. 2451 § I� 199 1). [Section 2.31.050 remains unchanged.1 Chapter 2.3 3 CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION [Sections 2.33.010 through 2.33 0x0 remain unchanged.] 2. .040 Membership. A. The Cultural Arts Commission shall consist of nine voting members that represent a diversity of backgrounds, to be nominated and appointed in accordance with Article V1 of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC,and this chapter. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 32 of 768 Ordinance Page 8 1. All nine members shall demonstrate competence, knowledge and experience in cultural arts; and a minimum of six members shall be appointed from among artists, educators, and those with professional qualifications and experience in disciplines of arts and culture, including the performing arts, fine arts.,culinary arts,media arts or related arts disciplines. 2. The Cultural Arts Commission may recommend guidelines to be used during the application and appointment processes, which may include relevant questions to be included on the application, a checklist of qualifications, and definitions of terms referenced in CVMC .2.33.040, related to the qualifications of members. 3. When a vacancy occurs on the Cultural Arts Commission, the City Clerk shall forward applications received for the vacant position to the Mayor and Cultural Arts Manager or other staff assigned to the Cultural Arts Commission. 4. Throughout the review of applications, selection of applicants to be interviewed and Interviews of selected applicants, the Mayor shall consider guidelines developed by the Cultural Arts Commission, as well as recommendations for interviews or appointments that may be made by the Cultural Arts Commission., City Councilmembers, and the Cultural Arts Manager or other staff assigned to the Cultural Arts Commission. 5. The Mayor shall review the forwarded applications and select applicants to be interviewed. The Mayor shall Interview selected applicants and provide the opportunity for the Cultural Arts Manager or other staff assigned to the Cultural Arts Commission to attend and assist with the Interviews. The Mayor shall make nominations for appointment, subject to the City Council's approval. [Section 2.33.050 remains unchanged.1 Chapter 2.40 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION [Sections 2.40.010 through 2.40.030 remain unchanged) 2.40.040 Membership. A. The Commission shall consist of nine voting members and up to three ex officio members to be appointed in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC,and this chapter. B. The voting members shall be appointed as follows: 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 33 of 768 Urdinance Page 9 1. Four of the members shall be appointed based on the City Council district in which they reside. This classification of members shall be comprised of one resident from each of the four City Council districts. Those members shall reside in their respective City Council districts at the time of their appointment and shall reside in their respective City Council districts for the duration of their membership on the Commission. 2. One member shall represent local educational interests. 3,. One member shall represent development interests. 4. One member shall represent environmental interests. 5. One member shall represent business interests. 6. One member shall be a member of the Planning Commission. (Ord. 3435 § 1, 2018; Ord. 3211 § 14,20111 Ord.2447§ 1, 1991,Ord.2129§ 1, 1985). C. The members shall be appointed in accordance with the Full Council Interview Appointment Process specified in 2.25.052(B). [Section 2.40.050 remains unchanged] Chapter 2.41 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION [Sections 2.41.010 through 2. 1.x'30"remain unchanged.] 2.41.040 Membership. A. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall consist of seven members appointed by the City Council from the registered voters of the City in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC, and this chapter. 1. Three seats shall. be nominated and appointed in accordance with the General Appointment Process specified in CVC 2.25.052(A). 2. The four remaining seats are nominated by a particular Council. district seat and appointed in accordance with the District Based Appointment Process specified in 2.25.052(C),. Members must be a resident of the corresponding Council district and must maintain their district residency throughout their tenure. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 34 of 768 Ordinance Page 10 B. In the event the City Council contracts with other agencies interested in recreation and parks for joint exercise of any functions, the contract may provide that the other agencies may have representation on the Commission during the term of the contract. (Ord.3212§91 2011). [Section 2.41.050 remains unchanged.] Chapter 2.42 PLANNING COMMISSION [Sections 2.42.010 through 2.42.020 remain unchangedl 2.42.030 Membership. A. In accordance with Charter Section 605, the Planning Commission shall consist of seven members to be nominated and appointed by the City Council from the registered voters of the City in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC, and this chapter. B. The members shall be appointed in accordance with the Full Council Interview Appointment Process specified in 2.25.052(B)�. C. A minimum of three members of the Planning Commission should be persons sensitive to design consideration and interested in townscape matters. Persons qualified for these seats should include architects, landscape architects, land planners,urban planners, civil engineers and other design professionals with suitable experience. (Ord.3268§3,2013;Ord.3211 § 15,2011). [Sections 2.42.040 through 2. 2.x'50"remain unchanged.] Chapter 2.43 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION [Sections 2.43.010 through 2.43.040 remain unchanged.] 2.43.050 Membership. A. In. accordance with City Charter Section 609, the Civil Service Commission shall consist of five members, nominated and appointed by the City Council from the registered voters of the City in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC, and this chapter. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 35 of 768 urdinance Page 11 1. Two members shall be appointed by the City Council from a list of four persons to be nominated by election of the employees in the Classified Service. Following receipt of the list of four persons, seats shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with the General Appointment Process specified in CVMC 2.25.0�52(A). 2. Two members shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with the General Appointment Process specified in CVMC 2.25.0�52(A). 3. The fifth member shall be appointed by the City Council from a list of three persons nominated by the four thus appointed. Following receipt of the list of three persons, seats shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with the General Appointment Process specified in CVMC 2.25.052(A). B. The successor of any member of the Commission shall be nominated and appointed in the same manner as such member was nominated and appointed. (Ord.3370§3,2016;Ord.3212§ 1,2011). Chapter 2.47 HEALTHY CH A VISTA ADVISORY COMMISSION* [Sections 2.47.010 through 2.47.030 remain unchangedl 2.47.040 Membership. A. The Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission shall consist of nine voting members,to be nominated and appointed in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC,,and this chapter. 1. Five members shall have expertise and experience in at least one of the focus areas of the Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan: an use, transportation., nutrition, health care, physical activity and/or environment. These members shall be nominated and appointed in. accordance with the General Appointment Process specified in CVMC 2.25.052(A). 2. The four remaining seats shall be nominated by a particular Council district seat and appointed in accordance with the District Based Appointment Process specified in.2.25.052(C). Members must be a resident of the corresponding Council district and must maintain their district residency throughout their tenure. (Ord.3364§ 11 2016). 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 36 of 768 Ordinance Page 12 [Section 2.47.050 remains unchanged.] Chapter 2.53 APPOINTMENT PROCESS TO FILL VACANCIES ON THE CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIFIED COMMISSIONS [Sections 2.53.010 through 2.53.020 remain unchanged.] 2.5 .030 Definitions. A. "Application period" means the time frame during which applications are accepted for a particular 1"'\ vacancy(defined below). The application period for City Council vacancies is defined in CVMC 2.53.040(c). The application period for specified City commission vacancies is defined in CVMC 2.53.0 Once established,the application period will be posted on the City's website. B. "Interview" means the process at a public meeting by which applicants are given an opportunity to present themselves to the City Council, and the City Council questions and evaluates the applicants. Should an applicant be unable to attend the scheduled interview, the Council may elect to consider a letter of interest or interview by other means, such as telephone or video conference, in lieu of an in-person meeting. C. "Qualified application"means an application received within the application period with all of the required components. The application form shall be available through the City Clerk's office and will specify the required components for an application to be deemed a qualified application. D. "Specified City commissions" means those City commissions specified elsewhere in this code, in the chapters and code provisions specifically applicable thereto. E. Vacanc (or Vacancies). For specified City commission seats, "vacancy" is defined in accordance with y CVMC 2.25.1 O�5. For City Council seats, "vacancy" is defined in accordance with Charter Section 303(A). (Ord.3435 § 1,2018;Ord.3393 § 1,2016;Ord.3370§ 1,21116)® [Sections 2.53.040 through 2. .060 remain unchangedl 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 37 of 768 urdinance Page 13 Chapter 2.61 "MEASURE P" CITIZENS' OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE [Sections 2.61.010 through 2.61.040 remain unchanged.] 2.61.050 Composition— Qualifications —Nomination. A. Members. The COC shall be comprised of 16 members, each with equal rights and standing to act and vote on COC matters. B. Qualcations Applicable to All Members. Per Charter Section 602(d), all COC members must be "qualified electors" of the City. A "'qualified elector" of the City is a City resident that is qualified and registered to vote as a City resident. COC members must be "qualified electors" at the time they apply and must maintain such status throughout their tenure.No COC member may be a current City employee or current elected City official per the requirements of Measure P (CVMC C. Designated Members. Eleven (11) of the total 16 COC members shall be nominated, apply and serve as "designated members." "Designated members" shall be nominated, one each, by the following nominating authorities (each a "nominating authority, collectively the "nominating authorities"), subject to the additional membership qualifications, if any, specified for each: 1. Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce; nominee(s)must have expertise and experience in at least one of the following areas: accounting, finance,engineering,or a related discipline(including construction); 2. San Diego County Taxpayers Association; nominee(s) must have expertise and experience in at least one of the following areas: accounting, finance, engineering, or a related discipline (including construction),- 3. Chula Vista Youth Sports Council- nominee(s)must be a Youth Sports Council Board Member; 4. Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Commission;nominee(s)must be from this Commission; 5. Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission; nominee(s)must be from this Commission; 6. Sustainability Commission. (formerly known as the Resource Conservation Commission); nomin.ee(s) must be from this Commission; 7. Chula Vista Director of Public Works;nominee(s) must have expertise and experience in engineering or a related discipline(including construction); 8. San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council, 9. Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, San Diego branch; 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 38 of 768 Ordinance Page 1 4 10. Chula Vista Fire Chief; and 11. Chula Vista Police Chief. Designated members shall be appointed in accordance with the Designated Member Appointment Process specified in 2.25.052(D). D. At-Large Members. Five of the total 16 COC members shall apply and, serve as representatives of the City ,"at-large." Expertise and experience in accounting, finance, engineering, or a related discipline (including construction) is desirable,but is not required. "At-large members"shall be comprised of the following: 1. One member may be a resident of any one of the four districts and shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with the General Appointment Process specified in CVMC 2.25.052(A). 2. The four remaining members shall be nominated by a particular Council district seat and appointed in accordance with the District Based Appointment Process specified in 2.25.052(C). Members must be a resident of the corresponding Council district and must maintain their district residency throughout their tenure. (Ord.3394§ 1,2016). [Sections 2.61.070 through 2.61.110 remain unchangedl Chapter 2.63 "MEASURE A"' CITIZENS" OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE [Sections.2. 3.010 through 2. .3.x'40"remain unchanged.] 2.63.050 Composition— Qualifications —Nomination. A. Members. The COC shall be comprised of 12 members, each with equal rights and standing to act and vote on COC matters. B. Qualifications Applicable to All Members. Per Charter Section 602(d), all COC members must be (.(.qualified electors" of the City. A "qualified elector" of the City is a City resident that is qualified and registered to vote as a City resident. COC members must be "qualified electors"" at the time they apply and must maintain such status throughout their tenure. C. Designated Members. Eight of the total 12 COC members shall be nominated, apply and serve as, "designated members." "Designated members" shall be nominated, one each, by the following nominating authorities (each a "Nominating Authority," collectively the "Nominating Authorities"), subject to the additional membership qualifications,if any, specified for each: 1. Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce;nominee(s)must be a member of the Chamber; 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 39 of 768 ordinance Page 15 2. Chula Vista Police Officers Association (POA); nominee(s) must be an active member of this association; 3. Chula Vista International Association of Fire Fighters (1AFF); nominee(s) must be an active member of this association-, 4. Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission; nominee(s)must be from this Commission., 5. Association of Chula Vista Employee (ACE); no must be an active member of this association; 6. Chula Vista Fire Chief; 7, Chula Vista Police Chief, 8. Chula Vista Middle Managers/Professional Employee Group(MM/PROF). Designated members shall be appointed in accordance with the Designated Member Appointment Process specified in 2.25.0520). D. At-Large Members. Four of the total 12 COC members shall apply and serve as representatives of the City "at-large." "At-large members" shall be comprised of one resident from each of the four City Council districts and shall be nominated by a particular Council district seat and appointed in accordance with the District used Appointment Process specified in 2.25.052(Q. Members must be a resident of the corresponding Council district and must maintain their district residency throughout their tenure. (Ord. 3444 § 1,2018; Ord. 3438 § 1,2018). [Sections 2'.63".070 through 2.63'..110 remain unchangedl Section 11. Severability If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. Section III. Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 40 of 768 Ordinance Page 16 Section IV. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. Section V. Publication The City Clerk shall certify tothe passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by Approved as to form by Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC Glen R. Googins City Clerk City Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 41 of 768 ATTACHMENT 1 [Sections in Chapter 2 not listed below remain unchanged.] Chapter 2.25 - GENERAL RULES FOR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS [Sections .2' .010 remains unchanged] 2.25.020 Definitions. [Only the below definition,is revised, as indicated;all other definitions remain,unchanged.] "Entire voting membership"or"entire membership"means those individuals who have been appointed to,have been sworn in to serve on,,have not been removed from,have not vacated their seat on,and who are eligible and entitled to vote as members of a board or commission. It does not include ex officio members and does not include any seat specified in the Charter provision or ordinance creating the board or commission that is unfilled due to a vacancy, pursuant to CVMC 2.25.105. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at least one-half of the votiiia . seats specified in the Charter provision or ordinance creating the board or commission must be filled in order for the board or commission to act. For example, if a seven-member board has two vacancies, the remaining five votiqg members constitute the "'entire membership."Accordingly, an action that requires a majority vote could be taken if at least three of the voting- board members vote in its favor. The City Council intends that this definition clarify the termer"entire membership"as used in Section 603 of the City Charter. [Sections 2.25.030 remains unchanged] 2.254035 Membership ® Changes to Seat Qualifications. A..............IT changes are made to the qualifications for one or more seats on a board or commission, including redistrictim,)r having occurred seats bei,u)r changed from,at-lar,�Ye to district-based, Qualifications being changed for a seat., or a similar event, the City Clerk shall recommend to the City Council for approval the assignments of the seated, members to the seats, with the intent of reducing disruption to the board or commiss,ion, to the extent possible. B. 'When, a member is reassigned.....the member shall retain the termer dates they were originally assigned. Reassigrijng a seat shall not extend a term or allow a member to serve more consecutive terms than the member would otherwise be entitled to serve. C. Notwithstanding subsectionA.above l if a member does not qualify under the new requirernents for the seat to which the member has been assigned,the member nonetheless shall be entitled to serve out the remainder of the member's term, with a qualified repl.acement to be appointed and seated for the succeed infyten-n. [Sections 2.25.040,remains unchanged.] Page I of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 42 of 768 ATTACHMENIT 1 2.25.050 T"+i,-%-*-V, �dr%Vv, Membership - Appli at and Appointments - General -1-1-YU1111ii V,I%./V A. The City Clerk shall maintain applications for prospective membership on boards and, commissions for a period of one year from the date of application. The application shall provide a place for an individual to state the reasons he or she seeks appointment to a particular board or commission and his or her qualifications for service on a particular board or commission. B. An individual who has submitted an application for appointment as a voting or ex officio member of any board or commission may be interviewed as part of the nomination and selection process. EC. If a vacancy occurs on any board, or co'nirnission within one eaof interviews being conducted for that ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ b-0-a-rd or i-n-te-r-y-i-e-Ws are notreg u_i_red if all of the followingctea aye net tie vasa. c as noticed and l:1_e_W_,,,,,I; ��(2) no nem _Ual-i de------------- 1-i-catio-D-5 ere re-c-e-i-Yed,-, orae or P---, -1 ===��------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------anP more qualifiedapp I i c ants horn the appointed,,- and(4) the appointment process for the board or commission does,not specifically pro it it this subsection. JD. Men-ibers of each board and commission shall be a 1"n-ted b at least three affirmative votes or the City -----—-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------�==p --------------------------------------y��-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C-0--u-n-c-i-t-, [Subsections CandD,above, were formerly 2.25.050 EandJ,respectively;no change in language proposed.] 2.25.0152 Membershi-p -Appointment Processes Processes described in this section apply to seats, on one or more 'boards or commissions, as indicated in the board or commission chaLiter within this,code.If no appointment process is specified for a board,or missIl the General Appointment Process in subsection(A),below, will aLiLily. GA. General,,,Appoi . When a vacancy occurs the City Clerk shall forward applications received for the vacant position to the Mayor,who shall review the forwarded applications, select applicants to be interviewed, Interview selected applicants, and make nominations for appointment, subject to the City Council's approval I I-xil CIL-11 Ixii%j 1%1w%�/ 1k1_/VJ_LLTt11L1L)01WJL1 I IlLia A-11"1111 III 001%J111 -"I%JVVU11 -IV_LCvLILLtt53 111-1VIAU D,p"j- Cr%11111ill 111";0 01; rmv%,A Dn_I_l,,o rmv%A C f-%Ii 11 11"1'1 1,V%1�11'1, 1,1k., V'I V V %JI 111 A 110 01%JJ A 1, 1 X 11,11111 %J11,11,111 63 a I lull� "11,%A'L "I IN,63 "111"'L N.%.1%.�1 1,111111 111111!�kft. [Subsectilion 2.,25.0152(D), above, is moved to the Bo�ard of Ethics Membership subse�ction.-',2'.28.050(A)(1).]-& Page 2 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 43 of 768 ATTA+C H M E NT above,[Subsection(E), 2.25.050(C).] w �.. FB. Full unci C. m 1 1"11111-116w� � i �, L �, . x . . �yWhen a vacancy occurs,members shall he appointed in accordance with Chapter 2.53 CVMC.. C. District Based Appointment Process. Seats on applicable boards and commiss,ions for whichprocess applies are tied to ,. particular Cunc" district seat. When *. vacancy occurs, the City Clerk shall forward applications to the Councilmember filling thcorresponding,district sea The Councilmember shall applications, select applicants to be interviewed,, Interview appointment, ` t to the iCouncil's, D. Designated Mernber Appointment Process. 1. When. a ancy o(curc i natc c ler all lac selected r a � t:. ------- at g ut ----------------------- tl Commission c accordance------------------------------------- i lice a rcc rc that each itin g t r cta � fir � c � �l: ted for , Courte-fl-consideration if qQY=Qfjhg=bggd,=ftNo1,n.inati1 th rities decline to exercise their nominatinLy aUthorit.vin a time fashion � ceases t � t r dist that part 's inti atlrrt all ass t a SLi,bst,a:n:t:i:a:I:I:y,,,,,,,,siii,iilarrrt 2.,25.052(D)(1), above, was formerlyprovi'dedfor in the Measure P and Measure A CiOzensdo Oversi'ght Committee,nomination subsections,,2.,61,.050(C) s in 2. mi ati tl r tics shall t tl c a cs c tact r ati r their r lir. .cc �nateNominees" t the �t lc�l a ........... 'Ierl 'hc fit lerl shall. i t c ate l i mit i str ti s t c ictc and submit t a, icatic s to the Cit Clerk,within a Dc ilio tip c � . c licati r s t` a. . forwarded to the . . ma _ 3. The Mayor shall Interview all Des_�gnated Nominees who timely ..ed s make nominations for appointment, subject to the City Ui�l's approval... 2.4. If a, No i ati� Y Arlt rit presents the �° . , �° fav with two or three nominees for con si c ati nars those nornil1 ces r cr t shall ale ...tM nomination . chs a the two or three nog ices presented. If a Nominating Authot Page 3 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 44 of 768 ATTA+C H M E NI T tl « p 11, rrt � ttl� � t be- re- e-r ® itted for the term at issue, but may be submitted for consideration for future trl «.. w. , were formerly provided for in the Measure P and Measure A Citizens' Oversight, Committee appointment subsections, 2.61.060(A) a,nd 2.63.060(A), respectively, With x GE. ' � .The Cit � �r l� l r1� a 1 t et processes rabove,, the development apulica le e r or « 1 itsClerk shall have the authority to developadditional tr t �1. , gyres to the xte- t e- t 1 t the te- of tl Oversight Committee appointment t ° chapters within this coderelated to board and commission appointments. [Subsection 2.25.052(E), above, was formerly provided for in the Measure P and Measure A Citizens' s 2.61.060(C) '. 63.,060(C)., respectively, with,revisions, asaf n .,, fit, V LN x r, - p r r" r° "r r e ... 'til,%. '^Y y "r r". r^ 1 r "Y 1.... V. I'll I"-1"-r r' x.. r.1 .. r,,.n. r. 1 r' XXL" F, ro w .. w. w « r' r' r y « v w.r'r1,%pi « « r' , �_ w VVILIL ,/ . « L �. ro x « Page4of18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet gage 45 of 768 ATTA+C H M E NT A f'� I I A A ggg, L w w,. w wW w1 H a a a w , ,.,4. w. m ro ro ro w ove, are mov app ,, commissions" .w (Ord-34494. 1,20119;Ord.3435 1°r ^r 2018` Ord. 3393 § 1� � `'�201+x` Ord.33 0§�a a 2016;Ord. 2 a v. 1a a 2013; Ori.3213 § 1,2011;Ord..3111 § 1,20,01 8). renumbered[Subsection(J), above, is 2.25.050(D).] 2.25.055 Membership Reappointment process. A. In the year of the expiration of a member's term,unless otherwise requested by the nominating authority for the particular board or commission seat, the City Clerk shall schedule the reappointments for eligible and interested members at a meeting of the City Council in July, or as soon as practicable thereafter, for all boards and commissions. B. Prior to reappointment, if a majority of the City Council so desires, the Mayor and City Council may Interview . be ers � r interested in and eligible ,1 ,1 -�.� inteds sats l otherwise of usingt � c Interview w Process described . .25.0 . w Cy q -w w u a , ow , "Ir") LumAl rl a L"), , � r NJ I 111111 L3 L. Following the interviews,the Mayor and City Council shall vete whether or not to reappoint the incumbents.. C. Regardless of the applicable reappointment process, each member of a board or commission shall be reappointed by at least three aff"tnnative votes of the City Council. when an incumbent is not reappointed, the seat shall be filled using the applicable appointment process. (Ord.3435 § 1,2018;Ord.3366§ 1,2016). Page 5 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 46 of 768 ATTACHMENIT 1 [Sections 2.25'.060 th�ro�ugh 2.25.080 remain unchanged.] [The following section is added.] 2.25.,OI85 Ern.ergency Operations. During a-period of,public etnerination.of a local.ernerg-ency, requirements 'related to boards and commissions described in. this code, includinfy frequency of meetin.,s and specified, actiyLty deadlines,may be tern-porarily revised or suspended in the discretion of the City Mana�,Yer.,after consultation with the Cijy Attorney and City Clerk. 2.25.100 Membership — Terms —Filling unexpired terms. Member terms shall be in accordance with Chula Vista Charter Section 602 and this section: A. A voting member who currently sits on a particular board or commission may not be appointed to fill the unexpired term of another voting member's vacated seat on that same board or commission. An individual who currently sits as an ex officio member of a board or commission may be appointed to fill the unexpired term of a voting member's vacated seat on the same board or commission if the ex officio member meets the eligibility criteria for voting membership. The appointment process shall be the same as provided for in the applicable I I< A<f) ernbership section for the board or comm.ission.f("N B. For purposes of determining whether the unexpired term of a vacated seat is less than,more than, or equals two years, the starting date of the unexpired term shall be the date the new appointee takes the oath of office, and the end date of the unexpired term shall be the expiration date of the vacating member's term of office.(Ord. 3435 § 1,2018;Ord.3213 § 1,2011;Ord.3111 § 1,2008). [Sections 2.25.105 through 2.25.190 remain unchanged.,] 2.25.200 Operations — Regular meetings required— Special meetings allowed — Time a and location to be established by resolution— Brown Act requirements. 0 [Only subsection(D)is revised, as indicated;all other subsections remai�n unchanged'.] D. As a general rule, boards and commissions shall hold their regular and special meetings at a City facility. Boards and commissions may hold their meetings from time to time in other l,ocati,ons ".;.''*,. t1flie, C,4F,, as long as meetings are properly noticed and held in accordance with state and local laws. [Sections 2.25.205 through 2'.25.300 remain unchanged.] Page 6 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 47 of 768 ATTACHMENIT 1 Chapter 2.28 BOARD OF ETHICS* [Sectiones 2.28.010 through 2.2 .040 remain unchanged.] 2.28.050 Membership. A. The Board of Ethics shall be composed of seven members, to be norninated and appointed in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC,and this chapter. 1. D—. When a vacancy occurs, Tfhe NU�Cit Clerk shall forward applications for membership on the Board,of Ethics for review,,-'- ointed ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------l; ------------------------------------ b-y--------the---------Chartet-Review Con-imission and one oar Mics c crapp- The panel shall review the apLilie ations, select apLil�jcants to be iitniter,v-iiewedd,.iillnterview selected a Mica , vailable seat P cants and recommend(b (I to for pi o-i-n-t-m-e-n-t---------- 2.--1 f th--eI shallnot'ifv the Ci ----------Q-1--er-k-1. so th at additional apRlications may be considered.- 4- et I 1< 11<11 M .32-Irregularities in this interview process s...,1 ...LII 111 %.1/V may be brought to the attention of the City Council. [Subsection 2.25.050(A)(1),above, was fortnerly 2.25.050(D), with minor revisions,. as indicated.] [Subsections 2.28.050(B)through(D), and sections 2.28.060 through 2.28.170 remain unchanged.] Chapter 2.31 MOBILEHO�ME RENT REVIEW COMMISSION [Sections 2.31.010 through 2.31.030 remain unchanged.] 2.31.040 Membership. A. The Commission shall consist of five voting members and up to two ex officio members, to be nominated ONTA40 I I< 0A appointed in accordance with Article V1 of the City Charter, %Z�V IVINII/ :H)Ch-apter 2.25 CVMC, and this chapter. 1. shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with, I the G-Teneral Appointment Procefied iss specin 2.25.052LA Page 7 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 48 of 768 ATTACHMENT 1 2. The four remainin�--,Y seats are nominated by a particular Council.district seat and do not require the m.ember to reside in. the specified. district. All four seats shall be nominated, and appointed in accordance with the District Based Appointment Process specified in 2.25.052(Cj. B. The members shall be appointed,in accordance with subsection A)of this section and as follows: 1. No member shall own or be a tenant in a mobilehome park. 2. One ex officio member shall be a tenant in a mobilehome park within the City at the time of appointment and throughout the member's term. 3. One ex officio member shall be an owner of a mobilehome park within the City at the time of appointment and throughout the member's term. (Ord. 3211 § 5,2011;Ord.2804,2000; Ord.2502§3, 1992;Ord. 2451 § 1� 1991). [Section 2.31.050 remains unchanged.] Chapter 2.33 CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION [Sections 2.33.010 through 2.33.030 remain unchanged.] 2.33.040 Membership. A.The Cultural Arts Commission shall consist of nine voting members that represent a diversity of backgrounds, to be nominated and appointed in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter,a*d-Cbapter 2.25 CVMC this chapter. 1. U.f4hIef---aAll nine members shall demonstrate competence, knowledge and experience in cultural arts; and a minimum of six members shall. be appointed from among artists, educators, and those with professional qualifications and experience in disciplines of arts and culture, including the performing arts,, fine arts, culinary arts,media arts or related arts disciplines. 2. The Culftiral its Cammission M:aY h apd ...................... ate inttnen 1 e'l hich, iiii include relevant stions, to be included on the -application- n checklist of quia,lificatioiis and definitions of terms referenced iii CVMC 2.3,3,.0140 related to, the q pah.fica.tion,s, of rnembers. Page 8 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 49 of 768 ATTACHMENIT 1 Cy A A!p1% 3. -.2,L.-When a,vacan occurs on the Cultural Arts,Cominisssion,t1he L,t Clerk shall forwai lications y UU-_" received, for the vacant to the May r and Cultura,I Arts klappiger or other stiff assi,'-pled to the - -- - --- - -- ------ ------- - ----- ------------------____o--------- —------------------------------------&------------------------------ Cultural its Commission. selected applicants,the M11111 ayor shall cons,ider gei ne � ped by the Cultural its Commission,as 'well as recornmendations for interviews or appointments that may-be � eanitade�b the Cultural Arts g-ne-d to the CU-1-t-u-'ra-1 Arts C-orn-rails.onm _,__4-;—The Mayor all review the forwarded applications and select applicants to be interviewed. The Mayor shall Interview selected Hca is an( rovide the o iportunity for the Cultural A1111 rts Manager or other staff assigned to the Cultural its Commission to attend and assist with-the Interviews. The Mayor -s-lia-1-1 njake namrr tr rq-tatfile-n-L-su ect to,the City-CounciPc, nnp-r-o-val-, ----------------------------------—---------------------------------- [Subsections B through E, above, were formerly 2.25.050(1);no change i*n language proposed.] [Section 2.33.050 remains unchanged.] Chapter 2.40 GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION [Sectifons 2.40.010 through 2.40.030 remain unchanged.] 2.40.040 Membership. A. The Commission shall consist of nine voting members and up to three ex officio,members to be appointed in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC,and this chapter. B. The voting members shall be appointed as follows: 1. Four of the members shall be appointed based on the City Council district in which they reside. This classification of members shall be comprised of one resident from each of the four City Council districts. Those members shall reside in their respective City Council districts at the time of their appointment and shall reside in their respective City Council districts for the duration of their membership on the Commission. 2. One member shall represent local educational interests. 3. One member shall represent development interests. Page 9 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 50 of 768 ATTACHMENIT 1 4. One member shall represent environmental.interests. 5. One member shall represent business interests. 6. One member shall be a member of the Planning Commission. (Ord. 3435 § 1,2018; Ord. 3211 § 14,2011; Ord.2447§ 1, 1991;Ord.2129§ 1, 1985 .) C.The members shall be appointed in accordance with.the Full Council.Interview Appointment Process specified in.2.25.052(fll [Section 2.40.050 remains unchanged.] Chapter 2.41 PARKS AND, RECREATION COMMISSION [Sections 2.41.010 through 2.41.030 remain unchanged.,] 2.41.040 Membership. A. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall consist of seven members appointed by the City Council from the registered voters of the City_Ln accordance with Article VI of the City Charter,Chapter 2.25 CVM.C,and this chapter. 1. Three seats shall be nominated and appointed in accordance w,ith the General Appointment Process I specified in CVMC 2.25.052tA . 1 2. The four remainingy seats are nominatedby a particular Council,district seat and appointed in,accordance with the District Based Appointment Process specified,in 2.25.052(C). Members Must be a resident of the corresponding Council district and,roust maintain their district residency throUghoUt their tenure. ; cr I I UV1111111111W Oil JL& Lll%; wy 1111111111W _L JL 11%o,Nz:WILY Nz;Wujavlkx I'Lluy %"Llu U111V illu NJ rLuViLo VkJJLJLJq_,.LJL, ['The sentence above i's rits already prdedfoir in Charction B. In the event the City Council contracts with other agencies interested in recreation and parks for joint exercise of any functions, the contract may provide that the other agencies may have representation.on.the Commission during the term of the contract. (Ord.3212§912011). [Section 2.41.050 remains unchanged.] Page 10 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 51 of 768 ATTACHMENIT 1 Chapter 2.42 PLANNING COMMISSION [Sectiones 2.42.010 through 2.42.,0 20 remain unchanged.] 2.42.030 Membership. A. In accordance with Charter Section 6,05, the Planning Commission shall consist of seven members to be naminated and appointed by the City Council from the registered voters,of the City in accordance with Article rrt,,,, VIA 1-11111%k41161 1-%-r +t-% VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC! and this chapter. IL J.1%11� 1 1."l I I"V X W It 1 1.1 V 1 1.1 LIP V1 k1) L Vp V Vp 1 1111P1 I k1)V V.1.-1 V",CIA t k Ok fN h f-I"d 4A A kx I _I_I1_ 11-k-rA%ch 1"4+x/ llrvlvrelxl,�v fl,%el "111" 411" 11"nilt k1a Oel+ n,+ viry fe�rA JFIHMF�Ils %J j1j11Uj_11VV VIX L-111V ll%JVVVVVJL UIV 11t4lituvi -11144 L 40fl U%1U .1 y "L 11ki y + "I"Ch L11"11 11111v. [The above language related to the number o seats on the Planning Commission i's removed as it is already p rd for in Charter section 6'05.]ovide B.The members shall be appointed in.accordance with.the Full Council Intery pointment Process specified 'in.2.25.052(tD-. C. A minimum of three members of the Planning Commission should be persons sensitive to design consideration and interested in townscape matters. Persons qualified for these seats should include architects, landscape architects, land planners,urban planners, civil engineers and other design professionals with suitable experience. (Ord.3268§3,2013;Ord.3211 § 15,2011). [Sections 2.42.040 through 2.42.050 remain unchanged.] Chapter 2.43 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION [Sections 2.43.010 through 2.43.040 remain unchanged.] 2.43.050 Membership. ,A. In accordance with. City Charter Section 609, the Civil Service Commission shall consist of five members, nominated and appointed by the City Council from the registered voters,of the City in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter,, Chapter 2.25 CVMC,, and this chicpter. Page 11 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 52 of 768 ATTACHMENIT 1 1. Two members shall be appointed by the City Council from a list of four persons to be nominated by election of the employees in the Classified Service. Following receipt of the list of four persons, seats, shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with the General Appointment Process specified in CVMC 2.25.052fA A. -Ttwo members shall be noininated and appointed accordance with the General.Appointi.iient Process N. (--I -I A,, .4 1 <1 CNIA40. J+X T IA0"1�t_-_A X-TT-1 4-% 1 specifiedin C'VMC 2.25.052(A)I b'yy t 41 il%-,,C%_,I L ]it VVIALI N-Al"FL%L N.,V Ivil-", 3.—tThe fifth member shall be appointed,by the City Council from a list of three persons nominated by the four thus appointed. Following 'receipt of the list of three -persons seats shall be nominated and .................... appointed in accordance with the General Appointment Process specified in CVMC 2.25.052(&A B. The successor of any member of the Commission shall be nominated and appointed in the same manner as such member was nominated and appointed. (Ord.3370§ 3,2016;Ord.3212§ 1,2011). Chapter 2.47 HEALTHY CHULA VISTA ADVISORY COMMISSION* [Sections 2.47.010 through 2.47.030 remain unchanged.,] 2.47.040 Membership. A. The Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission shall.consist of nine voting members,to be nominated and. appointed in accordance with Article VI of the City Charter, Chapter 2.25 CVMC,and this chapter. ITI,%rN xTr-ii-i"cr ol%rdl 1%cl rliN'--�f%-vA4*,,,,+,-,+1-,,, VNJLj'1'A'8 Lm ui%' 1. Five members shall have expertise and experience in at least one of the focus areas of the Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan: land use, transportation, nutrition, health care, physical. activity and/or environment. These members shall be nominated and appointed in, accordance with, the General 1 Appointment Process specified in CVNIC 2.25.052(A).,1, 2. a*d4The four remaining seats shall be nominated by a particular Council district seat and appointed .1 in,accordance with,the District BasedAppointrnent Process,specified in 2.25.052(C M I embers must be Z-1 a resident of the corresponding or. i-I district and must maintain their district residencv throughout ; tr . heir ten,ueL,--) Lly Lll%' V 10LU Luir" up't"I V%,,%A "'y p IL U11V N-1/111.4LILIL kill u ILY 'L-r I Z;V I uJaAa thi%jul5ir Ut U11%.111 LV111101 111EX11LILL"111 _L11VILL feSr%A%'JLJL%.'.y 1%,�VLAJI 0-LCILL130. X11%.1 UTM]'"L 111 V%a I V7 AAX Page 12 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 53 of 768 ATTA+C H M E NI T K (Ord 33+ 4,§ 1,201 ). [Section 2.47.050 remains unchanged.] Chalpter 2.53 APPOINTMENT PROCESS TO FILL VACANCIES ON THE CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIFIED COMMISSIONS 'Sections 2.53.010 through 2.53.020 remain unchanged.] 2.53.030 Definitions. A. "Application period"means the time frame during which applications are accepted for a particular vacancy (defined below . The application period for City Council vacancies is defined in CVMC 2.53.04C C .. The application period for specified City commission vacancies isdefined in CVMC 2.53.050(B). C nce established, the application period will be posted on the City's website. B. "Interview"means the process at a public meeting by which applicants are given an opportunity to present themselves to the City Council,and the City Council questions and evaluates the applicants. Should an applicant be unable to attend the scheduled interview,the Council may elect to consider a letter of interest or interview by ether means, such as telephone or video conference,in lieu of an in-person meeting. C. "(qualified application"means an application received within the application period with all of the required. components..The application form shall be available through the City Clerk's office and will specify the required. components for an application to be deemed a qualified application. D. "Specified City commissions" those neans t ese �ty commissions specified m this cocle, i the .. chapters and code provisions specifically ., 0. . . � ' E. Vacancor Vacancies). For specified City commission seats, "vacancy" is defined in accordance with CVMC 2.25.l 5. For City Council seats,"vacancy"is defined in accordance with.Charter Section 303(A). (Ord. 3435 § 1.,2018,Card.3393 § 1,2011.6,Card.3370,§ 1 2016). [Sections 2.53.040 through 2.53.+ 60 remain unchanged.] Page 13 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 54 of 768 ATTACHMENT 1 Cbapt r 2.61 "MEASURE P" CITIZENS' C VERSIGHT COMMITTEE [Sectiones 2.61.010 through 2.61.,040 remain unchanged.] 2.61.050 Composition— Qualifications —Nomination. A. Members. The COC shall be comprised of 16 members, each with equal rights and,standing to act and,vote on COC matters. B. Quaff cat Applicable to All Members. Per Charter Section 602(d),all COC members must be"qualified electors"of the City.A"qualified elector"of the City is a City resident that is qualified and registered to vote as a City resident. COC members must be"qualified electors"'at the time they apply and must maintain such status throughout their tenure. No COC member may be a current City employee or current elected City official per the requirements of Measure P(CVMC 3.33.160(D)). C. Designated Members. Eleven (11) of the total 16 COC members shall be nominated, apply and serve as "designated members." "Designated members" shall be nominated, one each, by the following nominating authorities (each a "nominating authority, collectively the "nominating authorities"), subject to the additional membership qualifications, if any, specified for each: 1. Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce; nominee(s)must have expertise and experience in at least one of the following areas: accounting, finance,engineering,or a related discipline(including construction), 2. San Diego County Taxpayers Association- nominee(s) must have expertise and experience in at least one of the following areas:accounting,finance,engineering,or a related discipline(including construction,); 3. Chula Vista Youth Sports Council;nominee(s)must be a Youth Sports Council Board Member; 4. Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Commission; no must be from this Commission; 5. Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission;nominee(s)must be from this Commission; 6. Sustainability Commission (formerly known as the Resource Conservation Conu-nission); nominee(s) must be from this Commission-, 7. Chula Vista Director of Public Works; nominee(s)must have expertise and experience in engineering or a related discipline(including construction); 8. San Diego and imperial Counties Labor Council; 9. Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, San Diego branch; 10. Chula Vista Fire Chief-, and Page 14 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 55 of 768 ATTA+C H M E NT 11. Chula Vista Police Chief. Designated members rs shall be appointed in accordance Member Appointment Process specified qel . . v www eases ta [Subsection 2.61.050(C), above, is consolidated in General D. At-Largeembers. Five of the total 16 CCC members shall apply and serve as representatives of the City "at-large." Expertise and experienceaccounting,, construction). `s desirableMis not required. "At-large members" shall be comprised of the fqllowing� [Provisionsrelated to experriencer requirements not changed.] I. 01member may be a resident of any one of the four districts and shall be nominatedaappointed i accordance Appointment r s s specified in CVMC 2.25.0 remaining2. The four accordance wDistrict ct Based,Appointment Process specified ` . Members must be a resident the corresponding a ci district a -.146h-must maintainis district residency C411 throughout � irtenure. I � , , 11 % I"cx .. engine "'L " IVICI IIIV LLI "III lo %IVOI1CVMI%;1 U v;El r-equinad. [Provisions ,,, is moved to the first paragraph of subsection(D), above.] 0 0 U1 I V U, e.. ,1111 �.� � ,� " above,[Language deleted in 2.61.0501(D)regarding redistn"cting occurring, consolidated with the General is Rules for Boards and Commissions M2.25. Page 15 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 56 of 768 ATTA+C H M E NI T r , 0 0 L 1 L k1 , Lliliv 0 ,ILY C,311"11 01 1 0, . .. , LIIV %�Iky 1)F--f-ej-e-et �. r ,. CtIl%A %J-1-11Y "-11V Ilk,11-111 III(A C . . 4vo .. I 0. s r �. ll 11,'u-JU16 -tfl-e,J1ALJ%..LL) 31AU11 ult u%,VVju%Au11,V�, VVI'LlI Lit%, OVL IMIL11 lit, .. n (Or .3394 1 2016). [Subsection 2.61.060(C), above, 'is consolidated in General' Rules Appointment Process po cti# rrs 2.61.070 through 2.61.110"remain unchanged. Chapter 2.63 "'MEASURE A" CITIZENS' OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE [Sections 2.63. 1 through,2.63.%O rerr�a r�unrchar�ged.] 2.63.050 Composition— Qualifications —Nomination. �. 'embers. The COC shall.he cot�pri�����' �members, each with equal rights and standing to act and vote on COC matters. Page 16 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet gage 57 of 768 ATTACHMENT 1 B. Qualifications,Applicable to All Members. Per Charter Section,602(d),all,COC members must be"qualified electors"of the City.A"qualified,elector"of the City is a City resident that is qualified and registered to vote as a City resident. COC members must be"qualified electors"at the time they apply and must maintain such status throughout their tenure. C. Designated Members.Eight of the total 12 COC members shall be nominated,apply and,serve as"designated members.""Designated members"shall be nominated,one each,by the following nominating authorities(each a "Nominating Authority," collectively the "'Nominating Authorities"), subject to the additional membership qualifications,if any, specified for each: 1. Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce; nominee(s)must be a member of the Chamber; 2. Chula Vista Police Officers Association (POA); nominee(s) must be an active member of this association; I Chula Vista International Association of Fire Fighters (1AFF); nominee(s) must be an active member of this association; 4. Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission;nominee(s)must be from this Commission; 5. Association of Chula Vista Employee(ACE);nominee(s)must be an active member of this association; 6. Chula Vista Fire Chief; 7. Chula Vista Police Chief, 8. Chula Vista Middle Managers/Professional Employee Group(MM/PROF). Designated members shall be appointed in, accordance with, the Designated Member Appointment Process sLiecified in 2.25.0 I A g%g U H''I Of I t -re ()K()1tA I [Subsectl'on 2.63.050(C), above, 'is consolidated in General' Rules Appointment Process subsection 2.25.052(D)J D. At-Large Members, Four of the total 12 COC members shall apply and serve as representatives of the City "at-large." "At-large members" shall be comprised of one resident from each of the four City Council districts and shall be nominated,by a-Particular Council district seat and appointed in accordance with the District Based, Appointment Process specified in 2.25.05 Members must be a resident of the cot-responding Council di.strict T�f-11 1�" 1"I lof*"n;1"14,9,1;" III;C1/1111,rNs. and must maintain their district residency thrMhout their tenure. ILAUVII 111VIOU 111"111UU111 11107 11%.11 XJ10L1 1VU I , 1%JV11VY Page 17 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 58 of 768 ATTA+C H M E NT C-1 +,pme ', vilt-41x Ir x JLJL . . l ry ry C C0 ,1 VV IUA C4,ILIUKUL Ll, L LA-1 Ary ry. [Language deleted in 2.63.050(D)regarding redistnectiong occurring, above, is consolidated with,the General Rules for Boards and Commissions in 2'.2,5.035] � . L . . ; We ,I . , [Subsection 2.63.060(A), above, is consolidated in General Rul'es Appointment Process subsection s,a (Ord.3444 1 2018 Ord.3438§ 1,2018). [Subsection 2.63.060(C), above, 'is consolidated in General' Rules Appointment Process subsection [Sections 2. 3.070 through 2.63.11 remain unchanged. Page 18 of 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet gage 59 of 768 Measure A Citizens Oversight Committee Roster Filing Categories: N/A Positions: 12 Vacant 1 Secretary: Claudia Bravo Chair: David Martinez Vice Chair: David Stucky Last Name First Name Address City,State,Zip Primary Phone Sec.Phone EMaill Alatorre Raymundo Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 07/23/2019 O�9/26,/2018 06/30/2023 0 09/20/2018 09/26/2018 06/30/2019 GMOC Rep Anaya Pedro Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 09/20/2018 09/26,/2018 06/30/2021 District 2 Rep Escobedo, Francisco Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 07/23/2019 10/30/2018 06/30/2023 0 09/20/2018 10/30/2018 06/30/2019 Chamber of Commerce Rep Ficacci Gary 11111111 11111111111 11111 _♦111 ��111111111 Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 07/23/2019 09/26/2018 06/30/2023 0 09/20/2018 09/26/2018 06/30/2019 Police Chief Rep Guillen Manolo Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 09/20/2018 09/26/2018 06/30/2022 Fire Chief Rep Hobson Nicole Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 0 09/20/2018 09/26/2018 06/30/2020 Association of Chula Vista IEmplloyees,Rep Martinez David Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 0 09/20/2018 09/26/2018 06/30/2020 Chula Vista Police Officers Association IRep Roberts Darrell Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 09/20/2018 10/02/2018 06/30/2021 Chula Vista International Association of Fire Fighters IRep. Stucky David Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 09/20/2018 09/26/2018 06/30/2022 District I Rep Tessitore Lynnette Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 0 01/08/2019 01/15/2019 06/30/2020 MMI PR Rep Printed: 11 3 Agenda Packet Page 60 of 768 Measure A Citizens Oversight Committee Roster Filing Categories: N/A Positions: 12 Vacant 1 Secretary: N/A Chair: David Martinez Vice Chair: Davild Stucky Last Name First Name Address City,State,Zip Primary Phone Sec.Phone Mail Volland John Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments O�9/20/2018 O�9/26,/2018 06/30/2022 District 4 Rep VACANT-Rubio Heather Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments I 1 09/20/2018 10/01/2018 06/30/2021 District 3 Rep Printed: 11 3 Agenda Packet Page 61 of 768 Measure P Citizens Oversight Committee Roster Filing Categories: N/A Positions: 6 Vacant 2 Secretary: Sandi Delap WK: 619-407-3581 Chair: David Garcias Vice Chair-. Leon Rrsht Last Name First Name Address City,State,Zip Primary Phone Sec.Phone EMaill Firsht Leon Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 013/02/2017 013/07/2017 06/30/2021 Public Works Director Rep. Freels Mona Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 03/0,2/2017 03/15/2017 06/30/2021 At-Large Any District Rep. Garcias David Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 013/02/2017 013/07/2017 06/30/2021 San Diego&Imperial Counties Labor Council Rep. Hunter Donald Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 013/02/2017 013/07/2017 06/30/2021 Police Chief Rep. Lengyel T.Michael Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 03/0,2/2017 03/16,/2017 06/30/2021 Growth Management Oversight Commission Rep. Maldonado Zulema Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 03/0,2/2017 03/07/2017 06/30/2021 Chamber of Commerce Rep. Martinez Greg Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1,1/28/2018 12/18/2018 06/30/2021 District 1 Representative Replaced Whitsell Prater Jason Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 03/0,2/2017 03/07/2017 06/30/2021 At-Large District 3 Rep. Redo Christopher Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 03/0,2/2017 03/07/2017 06/30/2021 At-Large District 2 Rep. Rama Oscar Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 10/17/2017 1,1/28/2017 06/30/2021 Sustainability Rep. Sheridan Christopher Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 03/0,2/2017 03/07/2017 06/30/2021 At-Large District 4 Rep. Printed:03)VAX23 Agenda Packet Page 62 of 768 Measure P Citizens Oversight Committee Roster Filing Categories: N/A Positions: 16 Vacant 2 Secretary: Sandi Dell WK: 619-407-3581 Chair: David Garcias Vice Chair-. Leon F'Irsht Last Name First Name Address City,State,Zip Primary Phone Sec.Phone Mail Vigilante Silvestre Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 013/02/2017 013/07/2017 06/30/2021 Chula Vista Youth Sports Council Rep. Voorhees Todd Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 03/0,2/2017 03/07'/2017 06/30/2021 San Dieg�o Taxpayers Association Rep. Ziomek Robert Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 013/02/2017 013/07/2017 06/30/2021 Fire Chief Rep. VACANT-Fernandez Hector Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 019/11/2018 10/29/2018 06/30/2021 Parks and Recreation Commission Rep. Replaced Doyle VACANT-Robles Lileana Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments I 1 03/0,2/2017 03/10/2017 06/30/2021 Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Rep. Printed:03 Agenda Packet Page 63 of 768 Civil Service Commission Roster Filing Categories: 3 Positions: 5 Vacant 1 Secretary: Summer Haskins WK: 619-585-5743 Chair: William Gersten Vice Chair: Felicia Starr Last Name First Name Address City,State,Zip Primary Phone Sec.Phone Mail Carbuccia Jennifer Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 06/28/2017 06/30/2021 0 02/04/2016 02/16/2016 06/30/2017 Appointed by City Council Replaced Villegas-Zuniga Fish Cory Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 08/22/2017 09/1,2/2017 06/30/2020 Council appt from nomination by Commission Replaced Reeve Gersten William Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 2 06/13/2017 06/30/2021 1 10/15/2013 11/05/2013 06/30/2017 Council appt from nomination by Classified employees Replaced Marrufo Gonzales Juan -1111111 -1111111111 _♦111 111111 Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 2 06/09/2016 06/30/2020 12/13/2012 01/08/2013 06/30/2016 Appointed by City Council Replaced Stevenson Starr Felicia Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 2 07/21/2015 06/30/2019 Continuing to serve until position its filled. 11/14/2011 11/16/2011 06/30/2015 Council appt from nomination by Classified employees Replaced Floros Printed:08 3 Agenda Packet Page 64 of 768 Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission Roster Filing Categories: N/A Positions: 9 Vacant 2 Secretary: Stacey Kurz WK: (6'19)585-5 o9 Chair: IDiana IMilburn Vice Chair: Roan Partida-Lopez Last Name First Name Address City,State,Zip Primary Phone Sec.Phone ElYlail Cruz Mary Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 2 O7/23/2019 04/14/2016 06/30/2023 1 04/12/2016 04/14/2016 06/30/2019 District 1 Representative De Murguia Mora Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 06/20/2017 06/30/2021 0 04/12/2016 04/27/2016 06/30/2017 Land Use Expert Jimenez Ricardo Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 06/14/2016 06/30/2020 0 04/12/2016 04/14/2016 06/30/2016 Health Care Expert Martinez Lucia Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 06/14/2016 06/30/2020 0 04/12/2016 04/14/2016 06/30/2016 District 2 Representative Melgoza Ana Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 2 06/12/2018 06/30/2022 04/12/2016 04/14/2016 06/30/2018 Health Care Expert Partida-Lopez Roman Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 06/20/2017 06/30/2021 0 04/1,2/2016 04/14/2016 06/30/2017 Transportation Expert Quiroz Lorena Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 2 06/1,2/2018 06/30/2022 1 04/1,2/2016 04/14/2016 06/30/2018 District 3 Representative VACANT-Milburn Diana Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 2 07/23/2019 04/14/2016 06/30/2023 1 04/12/2016 04/14/2016 06/30/2019 Physical Activity Expert VACANT-Ve/o Diana Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments, 1 06/14/2016 06/30/2020 6020-0 - 4/A t`cke 04/26/2016 06/30/2016 District 4 Representative Page 65 of 768 Printed:01/10/2020 Parks, and Recreation Commission Roster Filing Categories: N/A Positions: 7 Vacant 1 Secretary: Geovanna Gonzalez WK: 61911-4019-59179 Chair: Thomas Doyle Vice Chair: John Zarem Last Name First Name Address City,State,Zip Primary Phone Sec.Phone ElYlail Doyle Thomas Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 2 017/23/2019 011/26/2016 06/30/2023 1 011/12/2016 011/26/2016 06/30/2019 Replaced Garza Enriquez Nicole Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 09/11/2018 09/18/2018 06/30/2022 Replaced Buddingh Fernandez Hector Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 11/17/2015 12/08/2015 06/30/2019 Continuing to serve until position lis filled. Replacing Chambers Garcia-Lopez Maria Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 2 09/18/2018 06/30/2022 1 07/17/2014 08/05/2014 06/30/2018 Replaced Gerace German G.Michael Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 06/14/2016 06/30/2020 0 11/17/2015 12/08/2015 06/30/2016 Replaci ngi Boehm Gregorio Rennsie Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 1 07/19/2016 08/02/2016 06/30/2020 Replacing Vogel Zarem John Term Appoint Swear in Term Exp. Appt.Criteria Comments 06/28,/2017 07/11/2017 06/30/2021 Replaced Soto Printed:O$ 3 Agenda Packet Page 66 of 768 00000 U M M CITY OF C I VISTA Off ice �ol,f the City Clerk TE: June 8 2020 THonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council F .O :yeah Larrarte, Deputy qty ' ty Clerk SUBJECT: 6x/9/202 Council Agenda, Item #8 Correction to Staff deport :[dear CQuncrlmem ers; Tease be advised that there was an error in the staff report for Iter. #8 for the June 9, 2020 City Council Meeting. The corrected language is found below: BOARD/ #OF CURRENT APPOINTMENT PROPOSED APPOINTMENT NOTES COMMIISSIION SEATS PROCESS PROCESS AFFECTED ) = +Civilrvice Two members are Process A General L5 sea„ Commission interviewed and -e-Two members would appointed by fullI Council be nominated by Mayon 4�5 appointments ratified by full 'r: ,.4+'KA,ed .. ��.. Council ......... ... ... 6 r r d [itr it i a Hst of 4 Fi�e r e it rrr ii rr u irr : ........ ....... ......... ......... .... err o rn�"i....r .�rrniinater I�:ry"I...r"'. rr� �r�� �u s n11 I � �Il��ur Appointment process has urn r iiia II a irr it n r r i n n�r . been moved l from CMC .....Classified Service au lhoir�ii ii I ��n......�iii:..�l.. Chapter 2.25(General Rules ....... ...... ...... ..... irit,eit ii w r,.{a:, nim r.r�in to..f: r chapter to the Civil Service ........................................................................................ ...........errerrie rib r ii s, ....................................................................................... �...... Commission chapter. r.luuuru ii ..iiiirru,�irr e rs r n�"i�....r .�rrn ii n a �r�I�.r I re r,� r� �nliid li ,,,,,,,��ulll „�uur� nll ..... ........ ......... ....... ............. r r rn,aj,ri u r r ,,,,,, Cry irrn rrr i s s ii u"i rrr e rn be r ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 476-2300. Sincerely, Leah :Larrarte 276 Ffmyokb61PQRA,a Vista, C A 919'10 w. ~ la viis,t aviii .go (6;. ` 691-5041, fa xp�&�4§'161;�577 Sheree !Kansas From: Tamisha Woods on behalf of CityClerk Sent: Tuesday,June 09, 2020 6:32 PM To: Julia Sanchez;Sheree Kansas Subject: FW: Public Comment on 8 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Tamisha Woods Sr.Records Specialist -----Original Message----- From: Michael Rivera Sent:Tuesday,June 09,2020 6:31 PM To:CityClerk<CityClerk@chulavistaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment on 8 Warning: External Email How much authority to revise/suspend would the city manager have during an emergency? What would be the type of emergency that a city manager would need such authority? Would this be for member selection or simply location,date&.time,method of conferencing? Michael Rivera 2020-06-2:3 Agenda Pack-%ePage 68 of 76 Sheree Kansas From: Michael Rivera Sent: Tuesday,June 09, 2020 6:31 PM To: CityClerk Subject: Public Comment on 8 Warning: External Email How much authority to revise/suspend would the city manager have during an emergency? What would be the type of emergency that a city manager would need such authority? Would this be for member selection or simply location,date&time,method of conferencing? Michael Rivera 2020-06-23 Agenda Pack-%ePage 69 of 768 zmr, ..' l v r r IN III til C1TY' C,0UNC'1L A,GEN' DA S,TIA, "nEMENT l 1 CITY, OF CHUIAVISTA June 23,2020 File ID 20-0092 „MITI RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF'"THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT" BETWEEN EEN THE CITY AND CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. FOR TURN-KEY HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY Per Resolution No. 2017-151 (Attachment 1) City Council approved an agreement with Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. (Clean Harbors) on August 8, 2017 for Turn-Key Household Hazardous Waste and Conditionally Exempt Small (quantity Generator Waste Management Services. (Attachment 2) The agreement allowed for a two-year contract with fire S) one-gear extensions. .At the time the original contract was entered vitt. Clean. Harbors in.August 201.7,hazardous waste disposal costs were estimated to be $250,000 annually. This figure was based on participation rates of about SOO to 600 vehicles per month at the Household Hazardous Waste Facility,which has been the average vehicle rate through mid-2019. Participation at the Household Hazardous Waste Facility has begun to grow at a much quicker pace in the last six months and participation rates are now averaging close to 800 vehicles per month. Due to increased participation rates at the City's household hazardous waste disposal facility,the maximum amount paid to the Service provider is on trach to exceed the contractual amount allowed per year prior to the conclusion of'this fiscal year. It is also expected that this amount would be exceed in future years. Staff requests to increase the not-to-exceed annual contract amount from$250,000 per year to$350,000 per year for a new total not-to exceed amount for the potential life(original terms plus 5 a-year options)of the contract of$2,250,000. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act C QA)and has determined that the Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to State CEIA Guidelines Section 15308 Class 8 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment), Section 1.5 30 Class 30 Minor Actions to Prevent, Minimize, Stabilize, Mitigate or 1 . 0 0 1 P � 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 70 of 768 Eliminate the Release or Threat of Release of Hazardous Waste or Hazardous Substances), and Section 15061(b)(3)because the proposed action will result in the implementation of'options available to the public for conveniently and safely managing household wastes and thus reducing potential adverse impacts to the environment and human health.Thus,no further environmental review is required. BOARDXOMMISSION/COMMIT rEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION Per Resolution No. 2017-151, City Council approved an agreement with Clean Harbors Environmental Services,Inc.(Clean Harbors)on August 8,2017 for Turn-Key household H azardous Waste and Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste Management Services. The agreement allowed for a two-year contract with five (5) one-year extensions. Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) and Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator(CESGQ)waste are accepted at the City's Household Hazardous Waste Facility on Wednesdays and Saturdays.Acceptable types of household waste include common toxic items such as paint, batteries, household cleaners, motor oil, pesticides,and pool chemicals. CESQG waste is a small amount of hazardous waste generated by a business. The City of Chula Vista's HHW and CESQG program costs are paid for through fees collected on the solid waste rates and do not impact the General Fund. Costs are based on the actual number of Chula Vista residents and businesses participating in the program on a monthly basis.At the time the original contract was entered into with Clean Harbors in August 2,017, costs for HHW and CESQG waste disposal were estimated to be$,250,000 annually.This figure was based on participation rates of about 500 to 60�O vehicles per month at the Household Hazardous Waste Facility,which has been the average vehicle rate through mid 2019. Participation at the Household Hazardous Waste Faclity has begun to grow at a much quicker pace in the last six months and participation rates are now averaging close to 800 vehicles per month. This increase in participation is due to additional program promotion done by the Office of Sustainability and to an increased public awareness of the adverse health effects of hazardous and toxic substances in our homes and businesses. Due to increased participation rates at the Household Hazardous Waste Facility,the maximum amount paid to the service provider is on track to exceed the contractual amount allowed per year prior to the conclusion of this fiscal year.It is also expected that this amount would be exceeded in future years if no action is taken. Staff requests to increase this annual not-to-exceed contract amount paid from $250,0001 per year to $350,0010 per year for a new total not-to-exceed amount of$2,250,000,for the potential seven (7)year total contract term (original term plus five 1-year options). (Attachment 3). P 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 71 of 768 DECISION-MAKER C"ONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the real property holdings of the City Council members do not create a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under Political Reform Act(Cat. Gov't Code§87100,et.seq.) Staff is not independently aware and has not been informed by any City Council member) of any other fact that may constitute,a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There will be no direct fiscal impact to the General Fund. All current expenditures and revenues associated with this,contract and the Household Hazardous Waste Program are fully funded through the Environmental Services Fund. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There will be no ongoing fiscal impact to the General Fund.All future expenditures and revenues associated with this contract and the Household Hazardous Waste Program are fully funded through the Environmental Services Fund. A"I"TACHMENTS Attachment 1: Resolution No., 2017-151 Attachment 2: Turn-Key Household Hazardous Waste and Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste Management Services Attachment 3: First Amendment Staff Contact:Manuel Medrano, Environmental Services Manager, Economic Development Department-Office of Sustainability P : ge 3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 72 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. 20- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIME CITY OF C ULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT ENT TO TIME AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. FOR TURN- KEY UR -KE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND CONDITIONALLY Y EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR.WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES WHEREAS, on August 8, 2017 by Resolution No. 2017-,15 1, the City Council approved an agreement with Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. ('lean harbors) for Turn-Key Household Hazardous Waste and. Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste Management Services; and. WHEREAS, the contract terms were initially from August 2017 to June 30, 2019, and upon satisfactory work performance the parties were permitted to mutually agree to extend the contract for up to five (5) additional pane-year periods, from July l to June 30, for a maximum term of approximately seven (7) years; and WHEREAS, at the time the original contract was entered with glean Harbors in. August 2017, costs for Household Hazardous waste and. Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator waste disposal were estimated to be $250,000 annually; and WHEREAS, due to increased participation rates at the Household Hazardous Waste Facility, Environmental Services is on trach to exhaust funding for hazardous waste disposal before the end of the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City and Clean Harbors have agreed to amend the Household Hazardous Waste Management Services Agreement, subject to City Council approval, to increase the annual rate paid. to Clean Harbors from $250,000 to $350,00 for a new total not-to-exceed amount of $2,250,000, for the potential seven (7) year total contract term (original term plus five (5) one- year options). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED SOI VED b the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that it approves the First Amendment to the Household Hazardous waste Management Services Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Clean Harbors, in the form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall e kept on file in. the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute same. Presented by approved as to fora.by 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 73 of 768 ERIC CROCKETT GLEN R. GOOGINS Director of Economic Development City Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 74 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-151 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. FOR TURN-KEY HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista is the lead agency in the South Bay Regional Household Hazardous waste Management Program, which is a partnership between the cities of Imperial Beach,National City, Chula Vista; and the County of San Diego; and WHEREAS; the Household Hazardous waste Management Program is one element of the City of Chula Vista's Waste Diversion and Recycling Plan designed to reduce the amount of waste being disposed of at the landfills; and WHEREAS, the City released a Request for Proposals (RFP) to gain Household Hazardous Waste and Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste Management Services; and WHEREAS, the selection committee, comprised of a representative from each of the partner agencies, selected Clean Harbors Environmental Services; Inc., as the most responsive bidder; and WHEREAS, Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. has agreed to the terms and conditions of Chula Vista's agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. for turn-key household hazardous waste and conditionally exempt small quantity generator waste management services, in the form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk; and authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute same on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by Approved as to form by Eric C. Crockett Len G oa-inDirector of Economic Development to ey 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 75 of 768 Resolution No. 2017-151 Page No. 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 8th day of August 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla, and Salas NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None Mary S s, Mayor ATTEST: Kerry K. Blow, MC, Acting City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO } CITY OF CHULA VISTA } I, Kerry K. Bigelow, Acting City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2017-151 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 8th day of August 2017. Executed this 8th day of August 2017. Kerry K. i elow, MC, Acting City Clerk 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 76 of 768 CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONTRACTOR/SERVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENT WITH CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. TO PROVIDE FOR TURNKEY HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES Tats""f1m,"" by and between the City This Agreement s eeinto s ientrd effective aof A u g u s t 8, 2017 ("Eff ective t), I of Chula Vista, a chartered municipal corporation ("City") and CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL 0 SERVICES, INC., A MassachUsetts, Corporati,on ("Contrcr/",,--,')erN�ice, Provider" codec well, the "Parties," and, individually, a "Party") with reference to the folloNving facts: RE,CITALS WHEREAS, the CA)/ Of CbUla Vista is the lead agency in the South Bay Regional Household Hazardous Waste Progi-am, which is a partnership between the cities of Chula Vista, Imperial each, National City, and the County of SanDiego; and Z:� � WHEREAS, the Household Hazardous Waste Management Program is one element of the City of Chula Vista's Waste Diversion and Recycling Plan designed to reduce the aniount, of waste being disposed of at the landfills; and WHEREAS, the City released a Request t"or Proposals (RFP) in accordance with Chula Vista, Municipal Code 2.5,6 to gain Household Hazardous, Waste and Conditional]), Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste Management Services; and WHEREAS,,, this agreement defines the work to be conducted \vIthin the HOUsehold Hazardous Waste and Conditionally Exempt Sn-iall, Quantity Generator Waste Managenient program- and WHEREAS, Conti-actor warrants and represents that it is experienced and staffed in a manner Such that it can deliver the services required of Contractor to City in accordance with the tine frames and the terms and conditions, of this Agreement. WHEREAS.- Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that it is experienced and staffed in a, manner such that it can deliver the services required of Contractor/Service Provider to City in accordance with the, time frames and the terms and conditions of this Agreement. [End of Recitals. Next Page Starts ObligatoryPro-vi*sions..l 1If Citv Co u 116 1 approved. i Ilse rt d ate 01-clitv O.Allic I I 'a I)prov a . Otherwi.)�'.III sell a d ate no later I I I an d a te 0.,)ntractor wom commences. C'I(N Of ChLda Vista Agreement No. 170'7 3 Contracton'Sery ice Provider Name: 01"AN HARBORS SFRNII(TS, INC. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 77 of 768 I OBLIGATORY PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals,the covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the Parties hereby acknowledge, City and Contractor/Service Provider hereby agree as follows.- 1. ollows:1. SERVICES 1.1 Required Services. Contractor/Service Provider agrees to perform the services, and deliver to City the "Deliverables" (if any) described in the attached Exhibit A, incorporated into the Agreement by this reference, within the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence for this Agreement. The services and/or Deliverables described in Exhibit A shall be referred to herein as the "Required Services." 1.2 Reductions in Scope of Work. City may independently, or upon request from Contractor/Service Provider, from time to time, reduce the Required Services to be performed by the Contractor/Service Provider under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Contractor/Service Provider agree to meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with the reduction. 1.3 Additional Services. Subject to compliance with the City's Charter, codes, policies, procedures and ordinances governing procurement and purchasing authority, City may request Contractor/Service Provider provide additional services related to the Required Services ("Additional Services"). If so, City and Contractor/Service Provider agree to meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of negotiating an amendment to Exhibit A, to add the Additional Services. Unless otherwise agreed, compensation for the Additional Services shall be charged and paid consistent with the rates and terms already provided therein. Once added to Exhibit A, "Additional Services" shall also become "Required Services" for purposes of this Agreement. 1.4 Standard of Care. Contractor/Service Provider expressly warrants and agrees that any and all Required Services hereunder shall be performed in accordance with the highest standard of care exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. 1.5 No Waiver of Standard of Care. Where approval by City is required, it is understood to be conceptual approval only and does not relieve the Contractor/Service Provider of responsibility for complying with all laws, codes, industry standards, and liability for damages caused by negligent acts, errors, omissions, noncompliance with industry standards, or the willful misconduct of the Contractor/Service Provider or its subcontractors. 1.6 Security for Performance. In the event that Exhibit A Section 4 indicates the need for Contractor/Service Provider to provide additional security for performance of its duties under this Agreement, Contractor/Service Provider shall provide such additional security prior to commencement of its Required Services in the form and on the terms prescribed on Exhibit A, or as otherwise prescribed by the City Attorney. 1.7 Compliance with Laws. In its performance of the Required Services, Contractor/Service Provider shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state and local laws, including the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 2 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC,: 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 78 of 768 I s i 1.8 Business License. Prior to commencement of work, Contractor/Service Provider shall obtain a 1 business license from City. a 1.9 Subcontractors. Prior to commencement of any work, Contractor/Service Provider shall submit for City's information and approval a list of any and all subcontractors to be used by Contractor/Service Provider in the performance of the Required Services. Contractor/Service Provider agrees to take appropriate measures necessary to ensure that all subcontractors and personnel utilized by the Contractor/Service Provider to complete its obligations under this Agreement comply with all applicable laws, regulations, ordinances, and policies, whether federal, state, or local. In addition, if any subcontractor is expected to fulfill any responsibilities of the Contractor/Service Provider under this Agreement, Contractor/Service Provider shall ensure that each and every subcontractor carries out the Contractor/Service Provider's responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement. 1.10 Term. This Agreement shall commence on the earlier to occur of the Effective Date or Contractor/Service Provider's commencement of the Required Services hereunder, and shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all their obligations hereunder; provided, however, provisions which expressly survive termination shall remain in effect. 2. COMPENSATION 2.1 General. For satisfactory performance of the Required Services, City agrees to compensate Contractor/Service Provider in the amount(s) and on the terms set forth in Exhibit A, Section 4. Standard terms for billing and payment are set forth in this Section 2. 2.2 Detailed Invoicing. Contractor/Service Provider agrees to provide City with a detailed invoice for services performed each month, within thirty (30) days of the end of the month in which the services were performed, unless otherwise specified in Exhibit A. Invoicing shall begin on the first of the month following the Effective Date of the Agreement. All charges must be presented in a line item format with each task separately explained in reasonable detail. Each invoice shall include the current monthly amount being billed, the amount invoiced to date, and the remaining amount available under any approved budget. Contractor/Service Provider must obtain prior written authorization from City for any fees or expenses that exceed the estimated budget. 2.3 Payment to Contractor/Service Provider. Upon receipt of a properly prepared invoice and confirmation that the Required Services detailed in the invoice have been satisfactorily performed, City shall pay Contractor/Service Provider for the invoice amount within thirty (30) days. Payment shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A and section 2.4, below. 2.4 Retention Policy. Intentionally omitted. 2.5 Reimbursement of Costs. City may reimburse Contractor/Service Provider's out-of-pocket costs incurred by Contractor/Service Provider in the performance of the Required Services if negotiated in advance and included in Exhibit A. Unless specifically provided in Exhibit A, Contractor/Service Provider shall be responsible for any and all out-of-pocket costs incurred by Contractor/Service Provider in the performance of the Required Services. 2.6 Exclusions. City shall not be responsible for payment to Contractor/Service Provider for any fees or costs in excess of any agreed upon budget, rate or other maximum amount(s) provided for in Exhibit A. 3 City of Chula Vista Agreement No,: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC, i i k City shall also not be responsible for any cost: (a) incurred prior to the Effective Date; or (b) arising out of or related to the errors, omissions, negligence or acts of willful misconduct of Contractor/Service Provider, its agents, employees, or subcontractors. 2.7 Payment Not Final Approval. Contractor/Service Provider understands and agrees that payment to the Contractor/Service Provider or reimbursement for any Contractor/Service Provider costs related to the performance of Required Services does not constitute a City final decision regarding whether such payment or cost reimbursement is allowable and eligible for payment under this Agreement, nor does it constitute a waiver of any violation by Contractor/Service Provider of the terms of this Agreement. If City determines that Contractor/Service Provider is not entitled to receive any amount of compensation already paid, City will notify Contractor/Service Provider in writing and Contractor/Service Provider shall promptly return such amount. 3. INSURANCE 3.1 Required Insurance. Contractor/Service Provider must procure and maintain, during the period of performance of Required Services under this Agreement, and for twelve months after completion of Required Services, the policies of insurance described on the attached Exhibit B, incorporated into the Agreement by this reference (the "Required Insurance"). The Required Insurance shall also comply with all other terms of this Section. 3.2 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions relating to the Required Insurance must be disclosed to and approved by City in advance of the commencement of work. 3.3 Standards for Insurers. Required Insurance must be placed with licensed insurers admitted to transact business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best's rating of A V or better, or, if insurance is placed with a surplus lines insurer, insurer must be listed on the State of California List of Eligible Surplus Lines Insurers (LESLI) with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A X. For Workers' Compensation Insurance, insurance issued by the State Compensation Fund is also acceptable. 3.4 Subcontractors. Contractor/Service Provider must include all sub-contractor/service providers as insureds under its policies and/or furnish separate certif cates and endorsements demonstrating separate coverage for those not under its policies. Any separate coverage for sub-contractor/service providers must also comply with the terms of this Agreement. 3.5 Additional Insureds. City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers must be named as additional insureds with respect to any policy of general liability, automobile, or pollution insurance specified as required in Exhibit B or as may otherwise be specified by City's Risk Manager.. The general liability additional insured coverage must be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor/Service Provider's insurance using ISO CG 2010 or its equivalent; such endorsement must not exclude Products/Completed Operations coverage. 3.6 general Liability Coverage to be "Primary." Contractor/Service Provider's general liability coverage must be primary insurance as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers is wholly separate from the insurance provided by Contractor/Service Provider and in no way relieves Contractor/Service Provider from its responsibility to provide insurance. NION 4 City of Chula Vista Agreement No. 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC.; 3.7 No Cancellation. No Required Insurance policy may be canceled by either Party during the required insured period under this Agreement, except after thirty days' prior written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested. Prior to the effective date of any such cancellation Contractor/Service Provider must procure and put into effect equivalent coverages). 3.S Waiver of Subrogation. Contractor/Service Provider's insurer(s) will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for each Required Insurance policy under this Agreement. In addition, Contractor/Service Provider waives any right it may have or may obtain to subrogation for a claim against City. 3.9 Verification of Coverage. Prior to commencement of any work, Contractor/Service Provider shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and any amendatory endorsements necessary to demonstrate to City that Contractor/Service Provider has obtained the Required Insurance in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The words "will endeavor" and "but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company, its agents, or representatives" or any similar _language must be deleted from all certificates. The required certificates and endorsements should otherwise be on industry standard forms. The City reserves the right to require, at any time, redacted copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements evidencing the coverage required by these specifications. 3.10 Claims Made Policy Requirements. If General Liability, Pollution and/or Asbestos Pollution Liability and/or Errors & Omissions coverage are required and are provided on a claims-made form, the following requirements also apply: a. The "Retro Date" must be shown, and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of the work required by this Agreement. b. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided, for at least five (5) years after completion of the work required by this Agreement. c. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a "Retro Date" prior to the effective date of this Agreement, the Contractor/Service Provider must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the work required by this Agreement. d. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review. 3.11 Not a Limitation of Other Obligations. Insurance provisions under this section shall not be construed to limit the Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this-Agreement, including Indemnity. 3.12 Additional Coverage. To the extent that insurance coverage provided by Contractor/Service Is Provider maintains higher limits than the minimums appearing in Exhibit B. City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for higher limits maintained. 4. INDEMNIFICATION 4.1. General. To the maximum extent allowed by law, Contractor/Service Provider shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officers, agents, employees and volunteers City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. i (collectively, "Indemnified Parties"), from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs), liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts, omissions, negligence, or willful misconduct of Contractor/Service Provider, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and contractors, arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Required Services, the results of such performance, or this Agreement. This indemnity provision does not include any claims, damages, liability, costs and expenses arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties, nor does it apply to the extent any claims, damages, liability, costs and expenses arise from the active negligence of the Indemnified Parties. Also covered is liability arising from, connected with, caused by or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Indemnified Parties which may be in combination with the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Contractor/Service Provider, its employees, agents or officers, or any third party. 4.2. Modified Indemnity Where A reement Involves Design. Professional Services. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if the services provided under this Agreement are design professional services, as defined by California Civil Code section 2782.8, as may be amended from time to time, the defense and indemnity obligation under Section 1, above, shall be limited to the extent required by California Civil Code section 2782.8. 4.3 Costs of Defense and Award. Included in Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Section 4 is Contractor/Service Provider's obligation to defend, at Contractor/Service Provider's own cost, expense and risk, any and all suits, actions or other legal proceedings that may be brought or instituted against one or more of the Indemnified Parties. Subject to the limitations in this Section 4, Contractor/Service Provider shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against one or more of the Indemnified Parties for any and all related legal expenses and costs incurred by any of them. 10 4.4. Contractor/Service Provider's Obligations Not Limited or Modified. Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Section 4 shall not be limited to insuranceroceeds, if any, received b the � y y Indemnified Parties, or by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Contractor/Service Provider. Furthermore, Contractor/Service,Provider's obligations under this Section 4 shall in no way limit, modify or excuse any of Contractor/Service Provider's other obligations or duties under this Agreement. 4.5. Enforcement Costs. Contractor/Service Provider agrees to pay any and all costs City incurs in enforcing Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Section 4. 4.6 Survival. Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Section 4 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 5. FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF CONTRACTORISERVICE PROVIDER. 5.1 Form 700 Filing. The California Political Reform Act and the Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code require certain government officials and Contractor/Service Providers performing work for government agencies to publicly disclose certain of their personal assets and income using a Statement of Economic Interests form (Form 700). In order to assure compliance with these requirements, Contractor/Service Provider shall comply with the disclosure requirements identified in the attached Exhibit C, incorporated into the Agreement by this reference. G City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC,: 5.2 Disclosures; Prohibited Interests. Independent of whether Contractor/Service Provider is required to file a Form 700, Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that it has disclosed to City any economic interests held by Contractor/Service Provider,- or its employees or subcontractors who will be performing the Required Services, in any real property or project which is the subject of this Agreement. Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Contractor/Service Provider, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that it has not paid ora reed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Contractor/Service Provider, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Contractor/Service Provider further warrants and represents that no officer or employee of City, has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds hereof, or in the business of Contractor/Service Provider or Contractor/Service Provider's subcontractors. Contractor/Service Provider further agrees to notify City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. For breach or violation of any of these warranties, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 6. REMEDIES 6.1 Termination for Cause. If for any reason whatsoever Contractor/Service Provider shall fail to perform the Required Services under this Agreement, in a proper or timely manner, or if Contractor/Service Provider shall violate any of the other covenants, agreements or conditions of this Agreement (each a "Default"), in addition to any and all other rights and remedies City may have under this Agreement, at law or in equity, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving five (5) days written notice to Contractor/Service Provider. Such notice shall identify the Default and the Agreement termination date. If Contractor/Service Provider notifies City of its intent to cure such Default prior to City's specified termination date, and City agrees that the specified Default is capable of being cured, City may grant Contractor/Service Provider up to ten(10) additional days after the designated termination date to effectuate such cure. In the event of a termination under this Section 6.1, Contractor/Service Provider shall immediately provide City any and all "Work Product" (defined in Section 7 below) prepared by Contractor/Service Provider as part of the Required Services. Such Work Product shall be City's sole and exclusive property as provided in Section 7 hereof. Contractor/Service Provider may be entitled to compensation for work satisfactorily performed prior to Contractor/Service Provider's receipt of the Default notice; provided, however, in no event shall such compensation exceed the amount that would have been payable under this Agreement for such work, and any such compensation shall be reduced by any costs incurred or projected to be incurred by City as a result of the Default. 6.2 Termination or Suspension for Convenience of City. City may suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion of the Required Services, at any time and for any reason, with or without cause, by giving specific written notice to Contractor/Service Provider of such termination or suspension at least fifteen (15) days prior to the effective date thereof. Upon receipt of such notice, Contractor/Service Provider shall immediately cease all work under the Agreement and promptly deliver all "Work Product" (defined in Section 7 below) to City. Such Work Product shall be City's sole and exclusive property as provided in Section 7 hereof. Contractor/Service Provider shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for this Work Product in an amount equal to the amount due and payable under this Agreement for work satisfactorily performed as of the date of the termination/suspension notice plus any additional remaining Required Services requested or approved by City in advance that would maximize City's value under the Agreement. 7 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.; 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name;.CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC.; 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 83 sof 768 E E 6.3 Waiver of Claims. In the event City terminates the Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Section, Contractor/Service Provider hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or } compensation as a result of such termination except as expressly provided in this Section 6. 6.4 Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures. No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this Agreement against City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with City and acted upon by City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may be amended, the provisions of which, including such policies and procedures used by City in the implementation of same, are incorporated herein by this reference. Upon request by City, Contractor/Service Provider shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. 6.5 Governing Law/Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in San Diego County, State of California. 6.6 Service of Process. Contractor/Service Provider agrees that it is subject to personal jurisdiction in California. If Contractor/Service Provider is a foreign corporation, limited liability company, or partnership that is not registered with the California Secretary of State, Contractor/Service Provider irrevocably consents to service of process on Contractor/Service Provider by first class mail directed to the individual and address listed under "For Legal Notice," in section LB. of Exhibit A to this Agreement, and that such service shall be effective five days after mailing. 7. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF WORD PRODUCT All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement in connection with the performance of the Required Services (collectively "Work Product") shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such Work Product shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Contractor/Service Provider in the United States or in any other country without the express, prior written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, 10 copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such Work Product, without requiring any permission of Contractor/Service Provider, except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act or expressly prohibited by other applicable laws. With respect to computer files containing data generated as Work Product, Contractor/Service Provider shall make available to City, upon reasonable written request by City, the necessary functional computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. S. GENERAL PROVISIONS 8.1 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended, but only in writing signed by both Parties. 8.2 Assignment. City would not have entered into this Agreement but for Contractor/Service Provider's unique qualifications and traits. Contractor/Service Provider shall not assign any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement, nor any part hereof, without City's prior written consent, which City may grant, condition or deny in its sole discretion. 8 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.; 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name;CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC.: 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 8 of 768 8.3 Autho The person(s) executing this Agreement for Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that they have the authority to execute same on behalf of Contractor/Service Provider and to bind Contractor/Service Provider to its obligations hereunder without any further action or direction from Contractor/Service Provider or any board, principle or officer thereof. 8.4 Countg arts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an E original, but all of which shall constitute one Agreement after each Party has signed such a counterpart. 8.5 Entire Areement. This Agreement together with all exhibits attached hereto and other agreements expressly referred to herein, constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein. All exhibits referenced herein shall be attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, warranties and statements, oral or written, are superseded. 8.6 Record Retention. During the course of the Agreement and for three (3) years following completion of the Required Services, Contractor/Service Provider agrees to maintain, intact and readily accessible, all data, documents, reports, records, contracts, and supporting materials relating to the performance of the Agreement, including accounting for costs and expenses charged to City, including such records in the possession of sub-contractors. 8.7 Further Assurances. The Parties agree to perform such further acts and to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the provisions of this Agreement and the intentions of the Parties. 8.8 Independent Contractor. Contractor/Service Provider is and shall at all times remain as to City a wholly independent contractor. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor/Service Provider or any of Contractor/Service Provider's officers, employees, or agents ("Contractor/Service Provider Related Individuals"), except as set forth in this Agreement. No Contractor/Service Provider Related Individuals shall be deemed employees of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled, including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. Furthermore, City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax with respect to any Contractor/Service Provider Related Individuals; instead, Contractor/Service Provider shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and shall hold the City harmless with respect to same. Contractor/Service Provider shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its Contractor/Service Provider Related Individuals are employees or agents of City. Contractor/Service Provider shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatsoever against City, or bind City in any manner. 8.9 Notices. All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any Party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such Party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified in this Agreement at the places of business for each of the designated Parties as indicated in Exhibit A, or otherwise provided in writing. (End of page. Next page is signature page.) City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name;CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 85 of 768 SIGNATURE PAGE CONTRACTOR/SERVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENT N WITNESS WHEREOF, by executing this Agreement where indicated below, City and Contractor/Service Provider agree that they have read and understood oo all terms and conditions of the Agreement,, that they fully agree and consent to bound by same, and that they are freely entering into this Agreementas o the Effective a .. CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL CITY OF CH LA. VISTA SERVICES, INC. ByBY: AW Villiam sham MARY C ILLAS SALA Sr. Vice President Technical Services MAYOR ATTEST' M. KERRY � B GEL W, MMC ACTING LTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM ��� LEN 0"' OGI", S Ci-T Y A TT RN E , 1 /,,r 91,...Y.7 A,Y/./, ,/,./, '1'f./Y/,7 -'-.f' I n o r u,r i,�!//,r r , �,, � r ry , , r,,, �,;f� e r r ,+nIYI ,11/,y✓,,,JJdW,/„/y1;.,,,l,A,�.@/�.�,�/(M1tr./✓lydbr7//I,W,./„/WlJi,.6/1tlGkuW.dl./,./G„e/Ir,YfW!.r7��ll1F¢ll,,..r,.M/f,Y,i�/ar12.1aYrJi/F.Y/i/,f,.Y�dJ P�1.....,..,ii/r, ,,.�//t,l,,,.�,..,../�47 r-;-,.,.r. ]. e. /Y , F r ,.. & l 74 �,...F9J�G////rn,Je„n 1 11„4,,.I„',�,iW.,L MUM=r/,,....,.!((,1 1,.,..r- I Its, ../Y 7 �l.// .11. /r 7:... (. f..,., ;;., (/e Wr Chi M” /,.Pr17Aarld v'„7.7! ,?,J a �.��.Jy L. ,f;. .., r ...m, -.. ,. r6 W. /�.,../ir.,1411!11?7!f r.?LJ,GI,�,d7ar�i,(rr.G,OG/.,X111.1°W.GCJ4,rk.,.,Ji...RIAV,.�YW'//YUY IIdlw.PvYI.P7n"/.�wJll/G,('i,..'N��,+WA'.d!'ara,rtiflJ7dfi,r7l�/,ie�6”wJlr2/GF(✓!`,W.�„��„/1(09,,.,L/✓IuJef1//rr,',C/%"01�71Y!/��Y/,W((ly fdr,.!W69,,,dL��'J'tl„1!%yl/.A(eraC1L,°,o�,✓//!f/717rvrr", a, City of Chula Vista Agreement Nol.: 117073 j Contractor/Service Provid r Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTLYC RV ICE ,INC. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt gage 86 of 768 i s d EXHIBIT A t`s f SCOPE OF WORK-AND PAYMENT TERMS 1.. Contact People for Contract Administration anti Legal Notice A. City Contract Administration: Manuel Medrano Economic Development Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista,.CA 91910 (.61-9) 585-5766 mmedrano@chulav*lstaca.gov For Legal Notre Copy to: City of Chula Vista City Attorney 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA.91910 619-691-5037 CityAttomey a@chulavistaea.gov B. Contractor/Service Provider Contract Administration: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. k Javier Q. Ma.nzano, Technical Services Distnct.Manager - Southern California 18408 South Laurel Park Road Rancho Cordova., CA 90220 .(310) 307-7450 -manzano.javier cleanharbors.com For Legal Notice Copy to. Javier Q. Manzano, Technical Services District Manager- Southern.California. 18408 South Laurel Park Road Rancho Cordova,CA 90220 , (310) 307-7450 manzano.javier@cleanharbors.com 2. Required Services A. General Description: Contractor shall provide the necessary labor, materials and equipment to legally operate the City-owned regional household hazardous waste collection facility(PHHWPF), hold temporary household electronic and universal waste collection events (four per year), and conduct door-to-door household hazardous waste collection. B. Detailed Description: -MINV-40 ROOM _000- City of Chula Vista Agreement No,: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC.: t Ii 1 Task Description Defiverahles Completion Date 1 Operate the City of Vista Contractor shall: June 30,201.9 p , permanent household hazardous waste *Provide the necessary tabor, collection facility. materials and equipment to legally operate the City-owned regional permanent household hazardous waste collection facility(PHHWPF)available for residents to drop-off household hazardous waste during hours of operation. f Track,collect, package, transport,recycle,treat and dispose of waste provided to the PHHWP.F Select the appropriate treatment, recycling,storage and disposal sites for all hazardous I collected at the facility or events using the hest environmentally sound methods of waste processing hierarchy to include recycling, incineration, and landfilling as the least desirable option.All sites chosen.for temporary storage, treatment,,--recycling and/or � disposal shall be fully permitted under local,:state and federal laws.Contractor shall also be responsible for providing a wane analysis report that includes identifying the proposed disposal method for each waste stream,all proposed transporters and treatment, storage,:and disposal facilities (TSDFs)which will be utilized to dispose of waste collected and all subcontractors. Transportation of all materials collected to.the appropriate fa: i.1ity and from that facility to any secondary management facilities acilities as required. • Manifest, load and transport all conforming hazardous materials collected at the PHH-W'PF including Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG)generated wastes, City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: x.7073 tractor/5ervicc Provider Name:CLEAN 14ARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SFRV[CES,ConINC... 1 i 1 •Contractor shall perform these services in full compliance with � all.applicable Federal, State and local.laws,rules, regulations, including,local enforcement agencies for traffic control and orders of all regulatory agencies. •Provide one trained,qualified and dedicated Pro,"ect Manager to the.program for technical assistance and support,as well as all routine operational tasks. Project Manager or an equally qualif ed-staff member will be on-site at the P14HWPF to assist and oversee proper hazardous waste packaging and shipments. Provide one-dedicated, qualified Customer Service Re''reset�#at ve to the program for all contractual and waste tracking tasks and completion 1 and submittal of all required reports to Federal, State and Local-Agencies during normal business hours, • Pro-vide City with the following items no later than forty-five(45)days after the month of service:copies of all manifests,b 1.1 of ladings as we l l as a-monthly report on all the waste collected divided by site, type and amounts ofwaste collected and invoice for payment along with an itemized listing of car counts. ■Prepare and update all reporting documents required by -Federal, Statc and local agencies such m Form 303,facility operations and contingency plan subject to pity approval,and prepare an emergency response plan subject for review and approval by local.fire marshals for.said facilities. *Contractor agrees to provide staff services to transfer a licable erns its for the C p i 2 Operate the City of Chula Vista's door- Program administration to June 30, 2 01.9 to-door household hazardous waste coordinate with City staff to collection ro ram. schedule and rovide-household City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name.CLXAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC.. hazardous waste door to door cot lection service as requested by Chula Vista homes residents. R Complete inventory of materials to be collected • Professional,knowledgeable, } and friendly staff ■ Service completed within 1,0 days of in itial request(phone call or email) F Emergency pickup service _ available on a case by case basis, under City direction Assistance for all disabled and elderly participants requiring additional help in gathering of materials-resident must be at. home at the time of collection On-site inventory,collection, segre..gation,and packaging C completed by a trained chemist and/or technician Compliance with Health and Safety Standards per OSHA 1910.120 Manifest Preparation-to include Land Disposal RestrictionL7R , Bill of Lading'and Treatment Storage Disposal Facility(TSDF)and any other-regulatory documentation as required. Q Same-day transportation of all material.$to:Permanent Site for consolidation and packaging Reporting to respective City to include: name of resident,date of pick-rip and complete breakdown of pounds and/or gallons of material collected by class Provide City with the following.items no later than forty-five(45)_days after the month of service:copies of all manifests,.bill of ladings as well as a monthly report on all the waste collected divided by site, type and amounts of waste collected and invoice for payment along with an 'Itemized listing of homes serviced. Additional reporting to Ity 4 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIR0NMENTAt.SERVICES,INC. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, age 90 sof 768 I I pertaining to collection, quantification, processing and transportation of materials paperwork and forms required by Cal Recyc le,the Department of Toxic Substances Control or any other local,state or federal agency. Waste Survey and Customer Satisfaction Program 3 Conduct four temporary collection •Coordination with City Staff to June 30,2019 events of hazardous waste, universal mutually select event site waste mobilization and staffing.costs. location/s. • Event setup and breakdown ■ Professional knowledgeable and friendly staff Supplies-and equipment •-was,te collection,segregation, packaging,transportation, recycling and disposal • Prepare and maintain a facitity operations and contingency plan that shall include a contingency plan for unacceptable wastes such as explosive and biological waste,and prepare an emergency response plan subject for review and approval by local fire marshals for said faG i litres ,*.Permit preparation and submittal • Compliance with.Health and Safety Standards per OSHA 10 10.1.20 including all local, state and federal storm water protection laws . Mant.fest.Preparation -to include Land.Disposal. Restriction(LD,R),'Bill of Lading,and Treatment Storage Disposal Facility(TSDF)and any other regulatory documentation as required. ■ Safety meeting prior to each scheduled collection event Provide City with the following items no later than forty-five(45)days after the f event: copies of all manifests, bi l.1 of lad Ings as well as a monthly report on al l the waste collected divided by site,type I City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider(dame:CLEAN 1IARBC�Rs ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 91 of 768 i • i and amounts of waste collected s and invoice for payment along with an.itemized listing of car counts, On-going Project'Man•agement Meetings. 3. Term: .In accordance with Section 1.10 of this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall begin August 1, 201.7 and end on Jpne 3012019 for completion.of all Required Services. r 4. Compensation: A. Form of Compensation 9 Invoiced or agreed-upon amounts as follows; ..€.. ..a.. ..�,:..--.:.�:s.:^ ��i..1'`• ..3 ..�••.k'::i•'e. ••l'..'eF. 'F: •.�.-S.':;;rt ['.'F a:•5.. •1:... F". i.�'.S: fit.... .I'.'.g.x.-.S. [lx,� ..5 .`C: L:i•�''.'e:x b... 1 ..k..., •35.°"•R. .'Js:.'...:ne '� s�x �i „..�t';....,�.^:.fir •�.>,? ..�•r ...x. �s:��`.z::`'z-"''� '.�.: ee ;'�... �:ii. s y:.�::b'Y<a - >...Px.�.•= s.;§y� '�i['°!s.r r"�, -fig':''�`. �S� •,g�" y� �6 k• `.- ^'� ¢'�t �<`r" ;�Fe. •'dam' 'i*,...`Y ':a:; t e: x.< r� II ..s •.tiH"'r� ss. ° 3- > s`Z ds F` Y s..$.+.-:•%....y....,. .h... ..[..;x"!f- ,i.- E� 3"` r�'�':x• ..S•�. a7.�:� 'i.i.•:y-: ...�: ,€-. .e�. � •�..Y'.;.�- r. .�..�.� °:Ili °.*_,.. .: .7'.::' tap•:'•'!. '.n. '<-s f}" 'fid ".g ti+:-.. •.� .`:;4'-��'�,a::e.' Y i"• .�s+ 3f. A r..`s�•n Y .s.P :E`..-y:'�•: .Y.'��,�<.:..t.i.. :�r4 t .S.s �^`Y.•.:;..,:'� a,... !� i.. t1'��:'. �Y.+ ie: is .'Ye `n.s ;2 _ a. -•�a.. SP....x::,.s.- ��.: '�Y,':` ..'rs• .t... `.g x:hi .•zap'...'�s;�:,i'.ysy-'•a• ?.}.[ ��s �...;ks .z'f:'Y�[ 1 Ssy's'x:• .•^.:i� g k5'• .da'.e r •et x ..Z •:'y.si �i ->:•s.��•:a•. ,ss xi-°.,.$.:�� •�-...ape 4'a. hi �Y ':i• .iF! ii x - �:�.> ''S�="... 9•%':�:5�•`.. h�j',.�a. rr3,>7r � �E...y r¢ •.�.R .�> .3. .,.3.. -Y4:v �. �4, �,' - xr<r a�':.. r.v'.ni3°zs.. �i' ■•�- a�'�`' aft s _ �'..�-:. -�:�4•.. ..f�..r ,.i�. pp �.#= 1-x• 'A'•..^'� sF. def` ;::-r;� r}.. i, F-• `K nap '.'as.., c. r,p3 ,i•-:£:Y gig.€.., =a�'•�;x } �.�,•. kip "'n .�F .7 •�= .� zr. i��.4a :iK'�"r.r.ai. r'. s�T x:'fa!, <S.x-3'x. .kF§' P. - mil.'•" 's�� Y.ss .) 3 �tr� rz 3%,'S .:� yy�S, ,i ti4 '-•a. ,p' x ��ti•.:-�.....-8% `-5:� t is � x •x�kir ai'�':s:ri '�Ss�..r� .7 "�i':�•r:.��``-?",a'� -f-.�. r.�,• .sa iL':`•r� ;r'e y,' .:'.:c. F�-x `�;. ;� sus. f;� �. �- -.'y,:•.;.'•s�: � ':� a. ;"Y' AS] - 1.1M Y. y� s3s i`. �'' s�•x 'Y'� '.R. s�•• n�� c.� ..L I ..d a' .' �S':.`.T .s1..r- R' .: ...§ .e ':4' e,.,y,�s.sa.. .•d::6-j' T•t'.S' ..k' ��.. `g• •2'! +!'b �-. .4 - '�'s'.''v -`s•..;'.E: mss- '#'<.s F• '- 4 a � �.s .:�e. -.Sr' .•Y;.t ..E 5 '.'s•.°i.x...:.e y� 'Y:�r r.k.t.. .K'. L �°'..'f �2i r"•�:==`'x. I :-:F�� i,x+4/3. .A's ;i!.'n :'"' ��l ..4F ck':.. 8. � -#be ff�� .:F'.,.n. '`r.e '.S:F• L :;h�='6•t $.. �. ,$S •!- ,�'' r'�- �:r.. :-i,':, d�: 4_::'a'f' :.e. 6i5�- -nt... �'sg• �. ..'1. ^•>•' i 9•. ei;,'i':'. .:{!. g .�i. �'' :'�.. ..4,•- t.: r.t'� a:s.'f :c. ...FS•°:.. 'E.c 4a ..4 :�5 a Y`s�••.3 i''... �....-.a. ..�... .'6i,= 5 '°r%e5.'''•�y i. .s Fi3. is 9�,.r.:.i: `':X.• ``��''yy x€f. a s."�' :.:d�rx�;�� $. i':.1:'t��.;'v'. ',P:'§ -sY.,S.s, p•:�''�:i ':.�'�'� �4- .�'�:'��'3 .L.^ C'i- :�. Y. .Y ':�.' ita t•:.1`. a:'�,n yy f. g z§':Vic•�.yi: ,; %.1`�4': ':)_. ..:�.:., i ,° ear.��'�•...'r: �":.� `2 ik• �'< >SS •'�3x •7. .lex 3?� �t •3. rC: f4 55i':.. �•x r r i° sa-f' 9 .a'�� y `.S'�F'-; r.••-.., 'r'. sE.:�• �'r"a� �.: ..5.^ :q. ,F. '•F pia ..1.. .d _ `rF .i! .[.ex•: e,�..r'.&_ s."s.r •�} �-� ..ie ":3.:"' ,�. `F. :xi`ti:.n•,%pF ftii i=-'y,. of .Y`�'>'.. -f?.•' i.Y ifs..-s.:5. §£'•° i?�'..c�s ,3v..•. es•. a,�ri -^:yx .i.. r., iw ^ i g ..... ��..... ... ..-......,s. x::'` tet.• ..F._ "-�'�L..}e is• t �iAf -.r..j air. c•.7i<. �..,.>7 `''-Ct'.� r...$�•�,.. r.':'?' _ ,.yf. r.� i��`�',. `':€lam ':`......., %x S,• .•..F`.<. .fi'':`�..,� .a••:3'F:.'3'.n:.'i Iv, �.,..Lrr •3... F :-s .. ... ..: .. x.,.:....t>Y�.'• :.a'p't .t'-:= :�..;,'•.-:'=�".rt:s.1?'• f. :L s ¢ i ..'L-.•.�. ti .-.`°..: ..R4..F. '..;_ ^'i:"•yx%. `4'':i°Fi, e'�:`._z:'aai .[a• .�-:'i'.:'• °.:£ ',.xY�• x .<.3c f:%:�.''F is••:�.i. ttZc .. •• .:i e.�sF.s' q -:R Ftr.:i. tr S�: ..Y` ..4:e...�r , • t.£a. �''.Ei'..:: 5�'�- .�s.T�:_'F.`�,'R�¢��' a.iy z�"�',�3".:x::i:e' :i,a.l..�s.'�.x.sx3 :s� apps::='.s.'1.. s�;.S.. ,.3.�':•,.:.. .��.10-."' .vr'�.Tx's>•¢.T�4`..r " ::� S¢-::. .�•.•4�.,.b.y,a..e�•.. �.. ,...i' -�'.3.�.+-' ��=fW£-�=-'t:. � '�,r•..r.'�sSea 3§'?!'�"x:"�s..:.��•'s!i!'�'. a>P...Yi'z c�:s•.3. ,is.. fes.37:. .`.:�s.'e:^' .:a":.. -r.�. .xs``....,�c..... r-r..�x"=i. 4 �F�'x�:,a ]. operate the City of Per participant vehicle toad; i load on.vehicle,(15 g 1lons or-125 $61-00 Chula Vista permanent pounds) household-hazardous Waste Collection = per partl6pantivehicle load: 2 Loads on vehicle,(3,0 gallons or $30.23 fac i-li ty 250 0 pounds) Co ditionally�Exempt Small Quantity Generator qualified. $164.42 per f businesses in Chula Vista only, business accepted. I Sharps, syringes, lancets, infectious substances affecting humans $-18 5 64,Per 55-gal drum Other SS 20150 non-covered electronic waste, minus kitchen $,08 per app i.ances(EEE) pound SB20150 covered electronics,televisions,monitors,cathode ray $0,0.0 tubes,-LCD panels, laptops, flat screen televisions Paintcar-e covered products $0,00 interior and exterior architectural paints: latex,acrylic-,water- based,.alk=yd,oil-based, enamel(including textured coatings), deck coatings, floor paints(including elastomeric), primers, seaters, under,coaters, stains, shellacs, lacquers, garnishes, urethanes(single component), City or Chula Vista Agreement No,: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN 11ARBOR5 ENV[RONMEWAL SERVICES,INC. 2027-0,6-23 Agenda Packet Page 92 sof 768 waterproofing concrete/masonry/wood sealers and repellents(not tar or bitumen-based), metal s coating , rust preventatives,,field and lawn paints 2 Operate the City of Per residence load: l-load,(15 gallons or'1.25 pounds) $74.26 Chula Vista's door-to- door household Per residence load: 2 loads(30 gallons or 254 pounds)For every .$30.23 hazardous waste 12 gallons or loo pounds beyond per collection collection program. 3 Conduct four Event servicing 0-200 vehicles $4,,803,30 temporary collection events of hazardous Event servicing 200-400 vehicles $x,140,97 waste,universal waste 'Event servicing 400-600 vehicles $$298.64 mobilization and staffing costs. Event servicing 600-800 vehicles $ l 003.88 Event servicing- 1,000 or more vehicles $ 14- -6.54. 5 Pricing.Notes: 1. The per vehicle pricing in rows 1 and 2 do not include the costs of sharps and e-waste management,these items will-be billed separately as the respective rates on rows 3,4,5, 6 and 7. Participants bringing in only sharps and or a-waste � will not have the per vehicle load charged to the City, 2. The priciing in row 2 will be api - wip 'ed to each loadth greater than 15 gallon or greater than 125 pounds.The � wei ght of Paintcare covered products,sharps and e�-waste will not be included in the load weight. Sho�utd loads exceed 30 gallons or 250 pdunds Clean Harbors requests the night to bill for the additional loads upon mutual agreement with the - City of Chula vista. 3. The pricing in row 9 will be applied to each.load with greater than 15 gallon or greater than 125 pounds.The weight.of Paiatcare waste,.sharps and ewaste will not be included-"n the load weight. Should loads exceed 30 gallons or 254 pounds Clean Harbors requests the fright to bill for the additional loads upon mutual agreement with the City of Ch-ula Vista, 5 The pricing for collection,transportation and disposal of Paintcare covered products is contingent upon the continuance of the California Paintcare program and its costs reimbursement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum amount to be.paid to the Contractor/Service Provider for services performed through June 30, 2019 shall not exceed $250,000, 5. Special Provisions: . City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider dame:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. S Notwithstanding the completion date set forth in. Section 3 above, City has the option to extend this Agreement for 5 additional one-year terms.The City Manager or Director of Finance/Treasurer is authorized to exercise the extensions on behalf of the City. if the City exercises an option to extend, each extension shall be on the same terms and conditions contained herein, provided that the amounts specified.in Section.4 above may be increased by up to .2% tri years 3, 5 and 7 for each extension. The City shall give written notice to Contractor/Service Provider of the City's election to exercise the extension via the Notice of Exercise of Option. to Extend document, T 3 4 . 1 i I 'I i City of Chula Vista Agreement'No,: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMEN`rAI.SERVICES,INC. EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor/Service Service Provider shall adhere to all terms and conditions of Section 3 of the Agreement and agrees to provide the followingyp m.types and minimum amounts of insurance, as indicated by checking the applicable boxes(x). Type of Insurance Minimum Amount Form General. Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for Insurance Services Office Form. Including products and bodily 'injury, personal 'Injury CQ 00 01 completed operations, (*Including death):, and property personal and damage. If- Commercial General advertising injury Liability insurance with a general aggregate linnit is used, either the general aggregate limit must apply � separately to this Agreement or the general aggregate limit must be twice the required occurrence limit Additional Insured Endorsement *Must be primary and must not or Blanket Al Endorsement for exclude ProductslC'ompieted City* Operations Waiver of Recovery Endorsement ® Automobile Liability $1,400,000 per accident For bodily Insurance Services Office Form injury, including death, and CA 04 01 property erty damage Code 1-Any Auto Code 8-Hircd Code 9-Non Owned Workers" 11,000,000 each accident Compensation $1,000,000 disease policy limit Employer's Liability $1,000,400 disease each employee Waiver of Recovery Endorsement Other Negotiated Insurance Terms:NONE i f f i I 1 i 1 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:GLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMEWAL SERVICES,INC. f i EXHIBIT C CONSULTANT CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION The Political Reform Act'-and the Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code4("Code") require designated state and 3 local government officials, including some consultants, to make certain public disclosures using a Statement of Economic Interests form (Form 700). Once filed, a Form 700 is a public document, accessible to any member of the public. In addition, consultants designated to file the Form 700 are also required to comply with certain ethics training requirements.'SELECT OPTION A OR B BELOW(AND THEN DELETE THIS INSTRUCTION) 9 A. Consultant IS a corporation or limited liability company and is therefore EXCLUDED from disclosure. ❑ B. Consultant NOT a corporation or limited liability company and disclosure designation is as follows: APPLICABLE DESIGNATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS)ASSIGNED TO PROVIDE► SERVICES (Category'descriptions available at�wiviv.chidavisYtaca.govldepartmentsIcity-clerkleon}iet-o =-interes°t-cUde.-) Name Email Address ble Desi nation Enter email address(es) ❑ A. Full Disclosure ❑ B. Limited Disclosure(select one or more of the categories under which the consultant shall file): ❑ 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. 1:17. Justification: ❑ C. Excluded from Disclosure I.Required Filers Each individual who will be performing services for the City pursuant to the Agreement and who meets the definition of"Consultant,"pursuant to FPPC Regulation 18700.3, must file a Farm 700. Z.Required Filing Deadlines Each initial Form 700 required under this Agreement shall be Fled with the Office of the City Clerk via the City's online filing system, NetFile, within 30 days of the approval of the Agreement. Additional Form 700 flings will be required annually on April 1 during the term of the Agreement, and within 30 days of the termination of the Agreement. 3,Filing Designation The City Department Director will designate each individual who will be providing services to the City pursuant to the Agreement as full disclosure, limited disclosure, or excluded,from disclosure, based on an analysis of the services the Consultant will provide. Notwithstanding this designation or anything in the Agreement, the Consultant is ultimately responsible for complying with FPPC regulations and filing requirements. If you have any questions regarding filing requirements, please do not hesitate to contact the City Clerk at (619)691-5041, or the FPPC at 1- 866-ASK-FPPC,or(866)275-3772 *2. Pursuant to the duly adopted City of Chula Vista Convict of Interest Code,this document shall serve as the written determination of the consultant's requirement to comply with the disclosure requirements set forth in the Code. Completed by: Manuel Medrano 3 Cal.Gov.Code§§8 1000 et seq.;FPPC Regs. 18700.3 and 18704. d Chula Vista Municipal Code§§2.02.010-2.02.040. 5 Cal.Gov.Code§§53234,et seq. CA FPPC Adv.A-l 5-147(Chadwick)(2D 15);Davis v. Fresno Uni red School District(2015)237 Cal.App.4 '261; FPPC Reg. 18700.3(Contractor/Service Provider defined as an"individual"who participates in making a governmental decision;"individual" does not include corporation or limited.liability company) {� City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 17073 Contractor/Service Provider Name:CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMEN'T'AL SERVICES,INC. f i 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, gage 97 sof 768 CA ST AME1' DMENT to Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. For Turn-key Household Hazardous Waste and Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste Management Services� This FIRST AMENDMENT"Amendment"is entered into effective as of April 1, 2 2"Effective Date"by and between the City of Chula Vista("City")and Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. "Contractor/Service Provider"with reference to the following facts: RECITALS WHEREAS, City and Contractor/Service Provider previously entered into Turn-key Household Hazardous Waste and Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste Management Services "Original Agreement" on[July 11, 2017; and WHEREAS, City and Contractor/Service Provider desire to amend the Agreement to increase the maximum amount to be paid to Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. to adjust the not-to-exceed amount for each potential option term as, more specifically set forth below; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual obligations of the parties set forth herein, City and Contractor/Service Provider agree as follows: 1. Exhibit A, entitled Amended and Restated Scope of Work and Payment Terms is hereby attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3. Each party represents that it has full right, power and authority to execute this FIRST� Amendment and to perform its obligations hereunder, without the need for any further action under its governing instruments, and the parties executing this Amendment on the behalf of such party are duly authorized agents with authority to do so. City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.:J 7073j Contractor/Service Provider Name.- Clean Harbors Environmental Services,Inc. Rev,8/23/16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 98 of 768 SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO URN- SM LL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL CITY OF CHULA VISTA SERVICES, INC. BY: BY: ENTER NAME OF SIGNATORY MARY CASILLAS SALA S ENTER TITLE OF SIGNATORY� MAYOR [ATTEST BY. F, K. BICF LOW,, MMC. CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: GLEN R. GOOGINS CITY ATTORNEY City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: 7073j Contractor/Service Provider Name:Clean Harbors Environmental Services,Inc. Rev,8/23/16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 99 of 768 EXHIBIT A AMENDED AND RESTATED SCOPE OF WORK AND PAYMENT TERMS 1. Contact People for Contract Administration and me al Notice 4--y A. City Contract Administration: Manuel Medrano Economic Development Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91° 10 (619) 585-5766 mmedranogchulavistaca.gov For Legal Notice Copy to: City of Chula Vista City Attorney 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA "91"91 619-691-5037 CityAttorneygchulavistaca.us� B. Contractor/Service Provider Contract Administration: CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Jennifer McLaughlin 800 Verdulera Street Camarillo, CA 93010 (805) 914-1472 mclaughlinjennifergcleanharbors.com For Legal Notice Copy to: Jennifer McLaughlin 800 Verdulera Street Camarillo, CA 93010 (805) 914-1472 mclaughlinjennifergcleanharbors.com 2. Required Services A. General Description: Provide the necessary labor,materials and equipment to legally operate a permanent household hazardous waste collection facility, temporary household electronic and universal waste collection events (four per year), door-to-door household hazardous waste collection. City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.:j 7073] Contractor/Service Provider Name.- Clean Harbors Environmental Services,Inc. Rev,8/23/16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 100 of 768 B. Detailed Description: Task escr ption Deliverables Completion Date 1 Operate the City Contractor shall: ,lune 30, 201 of Chula Vista . Provide the necessary labor,materials and permanent equipment to legally operate the City-owned householdp old hazardous waste r zona erinanent ease collection faulty P1�1��TPF) available for hazardous waste residents to drop-off household hazardous waste collection facility. during hours of operation. Trach, collect, package, transport, recycle, treat and dispose of waste provided to the PHHWPF . Select the appropriate treatment, recycling, storage and disposal sites for all hazardous materials collected at the facility or events using the best environmentally sound methods of waste processing hierarchy to include recycling, incineration,and landfilling as the Least desirable option. All sites chosen for temporary storage, treatment, recycling and/or disposal shall be fully permitted under local, state and federal laws. Contractor shall also be responsible for providing a waste analysis report that includes identifying the proposed disposal method for each waste stream, all proposed transporters and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities TSDFs) which will be utilized to dispose of waste collected and all subcontractors. Transportation. of all materials collected to the appropriate facility and from that facility to any secondary management facilities as required. a Manifest, load and transport all conforming hazardous materials collected at the PHHWPF including Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators CE SQ ), generated wastes. *Contractor shall perforin these services in full. compliance with all applicable Federal., State and local laws, rules, regulations,including local enforcement agencies for traffic control and orders of all regulatory agencies.. •Provide one trained, qualified and dedicated Project Manager to the program for technical assistance and support as well as all routine operational tasks. Project Manager or an equally qualified staff member will be on-site at the PHHWPF to assist and oversee proper hazardous waste packaging and shipments. City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: 1 7073j Contractor/Service Provider Name:Clean Harbors Environmental Services,Inc, Rev,8/23/16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 101 of 768 o Provide one dedicated, qualified Customer Service Representative to the program for all contractual and waste tracking tasks and completion and submittal of all required reports to Federal, State and Local Agencies during normal business hours. o Provide City with the following items no later than forty-five (45) days after the month of service: copies of all manifests, bill of ladings, as well as a monthly report on all the waste collected divided by site,type and amounts of waste collected and invoice for payment along with an itemized listing of car counts. * Prepare and update all reporting documents required by Federal, State and local agencies such as Form 303, facility operations and contingency plan subject to City approval, and prepare an emergency response plan subject for review and approval by local fire marshals for said facilities. *Contractor agrees to provide staff services to transfer applicable permits for the City. 2 Operate the City Program administration to coordinate with City staff June 30, 2019 of Chula Vista's to schedule and provide household hazardous waste door-to-door door-to-door collection service as requested by Chula Vista residents. household o Complete inventory of materials to be collected hazardous waste a Professional,knowledgeable, collection and friendly staff o Service completed within 10 days of initial request program. (by phone or email.) a Emergency pickup service available ona case by case basis,under City direction. a Assistance for all disabled and elderly participants requiring additional.help in.gathering of materials - resident must be at home at the time of collection a On-site inventory, collection, segregation and packaging completed by a trained chemist and/or technician. a Compliance with Health and Safety Standards per OSHA, 1910.120. o Manifest Preparation-to include Land Disposal Restriction(LOR), Bill of Lading,and Treatment Storage Disposal Facility(TSDF),and any other regulatory documentation as required. e Same-day transportation of all materials to Permanent Site for consolidation and packaging. o Reporting to respective City to include name of resident, date of pick-up and complete breakdown of pounds and/or gallons of material collected by class. o Provide City with the City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.:J 7073j Contractor/Service Provider Name.- Clean Harbors Environmental Services,Inc. Rev,8/23/16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 102 of 768 following items no later than forty-five(45)days after the month of service: copies of all manifests,bill of lallings as well as a monthly report on all the waste collected divided by site,type and amounts of waste collected and invoice for payment along with an itemized listing of homes serviced. *Additional reporting to City pertaining to collection, quantification,processing and transportation of materials paperwork and forms required by CalRecycle,the Department of Toxic Substances Control or any other local, state or federal agency. *Waste Survey and Customer Satisfaction Program Monthly services provided as needed. 3 Conduct four * Coordination with City Staff to mutually select the June 30, 2019 temporary event site location(s) collection events * Event setup and breakdown of hazardous 9 Professional knowledgeable and friendly staff waste, universal * Supplies and equipment 9 Waste collection.1 segregation, packaging, waste transportation., recycling and disposal mobilization and * Prepare and maintain a facility operations and staffing costs. contingency plan that shall include a contingency plan for unacceptable wastes such as explosive and biological waste, and prepare an emergency response plan subject for review and approval by local fire marshals for said facilities * Permit preparation and submittal, * Compliance with Health and Safety Standards per OSHA 1910.120 including all local, state and federal storm water protection laws * Manifest Preparation- to include Land Disposal Restriction (LO , Bill of Lading, and Treatment Storage Disposal Facility (TSDF) and any other regulatory documentation as required. * Safety meeting prior to each scheduled collection event * Provide City with the following items no later than forty-five (45) days after the event: copies of all manifests,bill of ladings, as well as a monthly report on all the waste collected divided by site,type and amounts of waste collected and invoice for payment along with an itemized listing of car counts * On-going Project Management Meetings City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.:J 7073j Contractor/Service Provider Name.- Clean Harbors Environmental Services,Inc. Rev,8/23/16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 103 of 768 3. 'Term: In accordance with Secti©n 1.10 of this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall begin August 1, 2017and end on June 30, 2019 for completion of all Required Services. 4. Compensation: 0 Invoiced or agreed-upon amounts as follows: ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT' PRICE, Turnkey Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility of hazardous waste, universal waste and sharps: 1 Administration, staffing, 3 Per participant/vehicle load: 1. load on vehicle, (15 gallons $ 62.22 technicians, I trained or 125 pounds) chemist. Vehicle unloading, hazcatting, packaging and shipment preparation, transportation and disposal. 2 Same as Row I Description Per participant/vehicle load: 2 loads on vehicle, (30 gallons $ 30.83 or 250 pounds) Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator qualified $167.71 per 3 Same as Row I Description business businesses in Chula Vista only. accepted. 4 Same as Row I Description Sharps, syringes, lancets, infectious substances affecting $189.35 Per humans 55-gal. drum 5 Same as Row I Description Other SB 20/50 non-covered electronic waste, minus $.08 per kitchen appliances (EEE) pound 6 Same as Row I Description SB20/50 covered electronics, televisions, monitors, cathode $ 0.00 ray tubes, LCD panels, laptops, flat screen televisions Paintcare covered products interior and exterior architectural paints: latex, acrylic, wate r-based, alkyd, oil- based, enamel(including textured coatings), deck coatings, floor paints (including elastomeric), 7 Same as Row I Description primers, sealers, under-waters, stains, $0.00 shellacs, lacquers, varnishes, urethanes (single component), waterproofing concrete/masonry/wood sealers and repellents (not tar or bitumen-based), metal coatings, rust preventatives, field and lawn paints Door-to-door program, 8 Collection of household Per residence load: I load, (15 gallons or 125 pounds) $75.75 hazardous waste, universal. waste and sharps, City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.:j 7073] Contractor/Service Provider Name.- Clean Harbors Environmental Services,Inc. Rev,8/23/16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 104 of 768 Administration, staffing, transportation, hazcatting, packaging, anifestation/administration. and or recycling or disposal 9 Same as Row Per residence Description load: 2 loads gallons or 250 pounds) 30.83 every 12 gallons or 100 pounds beyond per collection Temporary Collection Event/s of hazardous waste., 1 Event servicing -2+ 0 vehicles $4,899.37 universal waste mobilization, staffing, costs 11 Sarre as Row 10 Description Event servicing,200-400 vehicles $6>3.79 3.7'9 12 Same as Row 10 Description Event servicing 400-600 vehicles $8,1464.61 1.3 Sarre as Row 10 Description Event servicing 600-800 vehicles $1.11529.96 " tion .vent servicing 1 ore vehicles $14,948.05 1 dame as Row 1 o Description ,000 or Notwithstanding the foregoing,the maximum amount to be paid to the Contractor/Service Provider for services performed through,June 30, 2024i shall not exceed$2,250,000. If the City exercises an. option to extend the Agreement (as provided below), the amount to be paid to the Contractor/Service provider for services provided during the terry of that extension shall not exceed $350,000. If the City exercises all additional options to extend the Agreement, the total. amount to be paid to the Contractor/Service Provider for services provided during the initial and optional extension periods shall not exceed $2,250,000. 5. Special Provisions: ons: Z options to Extend Notwithstanding the completion date set forth in section 3.C., above, Citi has option to extend this Agreement g or up to five (5) additional gears, in one-year increments. The Director of Finance/Treasurer shall be authorized to exercise the extensions on behalf of the City. If the City exercises an option to extend, each extension shall be on the same terms and conditions contained herein, provided that the amounts specified in Section 4, above, may be increased by up to 2% in years three (3), five ( , and seven (7) for each extension. The City shall give written notice to Contractor/Service Provider of the City's election to exercise the extension. Such notice shall be provided at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the term. City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.:j 7073j Contractor/service Provider Name:Clean Harbors Environmental services,Inc, Rev,8/23/16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 105 of 768 zmr, ..' l v r r IN III til C1TY' C,0UNC'1L A,GEN' DA S,TIA, "nEMENT l 1 CITY, OF CHUIAVISTA June 23,2020 File ID: 20-0233 ,TITS RESOLUTION OF THE CI"T"Y" COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF C ULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY AND NATURESCAPE SERVICES, INC. FOR OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE SERVICES IN BID GROUP 9 IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $120,755 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021 ACTIONRECOMMENDED " Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On May 20, 20,201, City staff received responsive bids from Aztec Landscaping, Inc., Brightview Landscape Services, Cielo Azul Inc. dba. Cielo Azul Landscape Maintenance, GeoCal Environmental Management & Landscaping,and NatureScape Services Inc.for Bid Group 9landscape maintenance services.Funding for the contracts are included within the budget for the Open Space Districts.Staff's recommendation is that Council accept the bids and award the contract for.Bid group 9 to Natur'eScape Services Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for,a Categorical Exemption pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 1.5304 Class 4 (Minor Alterations to Land) and Section. 1.5301. Class 1 (Existing Facilities) because the proposed project would not result in a significant effect on the environment,create a cumulative impact,damage a scenic highway,or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of historical resource.Thus,no furter environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION On May 20, 20,201, Citi staff received responsive bids from Aztec Landscaping, Inc., Brightview Landscape Services, Cielo Azul Inc. dba Cielo Azul Landscape Maintenance, GeoCal Environmental Management Landscaping, and NatureScape Services Inc. for the landscape maintenance ce services for Croup 9, which includes 6 Open.Space Districts. 1 . 0 0 1 P Ii1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 106 of 768 After compilation of the, bids, staff determined NatureScape Services Inc. to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for Bid Group 9. Below is the summary table that reflects bid amounts by Group Vendor. The highlighted cells represent the lowest bidder for the group. Geo�Cal Aztec Bri'ghtVioew Environmental Landscapffig, Landscape Management NatureScape Bird Gro Inc. Services Uelo Azul Inc. &Landscaping Services Inc. 9 $244)325.04 $181)829.28 $239)761.00 $220,332.20 $120,755.0O Staff recommends accepting the contractors' bids and awarding the Open Space landscape maintenance contract to NatureScape Services Inc. Key provisions of the contracts include, but are not limited to, the following: the contract term is initially from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021. If a contractor's work performance is satisfactory, the parties may mutually agree in writing to extend the contract for four (4') additional (1) year periods. The annual option year renewals would be effective from July 1 to June 30 (the City 01 s Fiscal Year). If a contractor's work performance is not satisfactory, the City reserves the right to not renew the contract without penalty. Contractor's prices above shall be firm through June 30, 2021. If the parties agree to extend the contract for the option years,acceptable price increases maybe agreed to and such increases would be based on changes in the annual San Diego Area Consumer Price Index (CPI-w), in an amount not to exceed 5%., Each of the contractors is required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them forte work performed under this contract and shall ensure compliance with all applicable state and local laws governing the payment of prevailing wages. DECISION-MAI F Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found that Mayor Salas has property holdings within 1,000 feet of the, boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. However,the decision solely concerns repairs,replacement or maintenance of existing streets.,water.,sewer, storm drainage or similar facilities, and the member 11 s property will not be affected disproportionately to other properties receiving the same services. Consequently,pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 2, sections 18700 and 18702.2(d)(1)),this item does not present a real property-related conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal. Govt Code§871o0, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There is no current year fiscal impact. ONGOING FISCALI T The annual contract cost will be included in the respective budgets for the Open Space Districts included in Bid Group 9.For Fiscal Year 2021,the contract totals approximately$120,755.The contract amount has been P12 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 107 of 768 incorporated into the Fiscal Year 20budget,which was adopted on June 9, 2020. Contract extensions will be included as part of'the normal budget development process. ATTAC14MENTS 1. 2-Party Agreement with NatureScape Services Inc. 2. Landscape Maintenance Standards Staff Contact.- Tessa Nguyen,Senior Management Analyst P 3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 108 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY AND NAT URS CAPE SERVICES, INC. FOR OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE SERVICES IN BID GROUP 9 IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF 120,x"551 OR FISCAL YEAR 2021 WHEREAS, the City currently administers and maintains 50 Open Space and Community Facilities Districts, and their associated zones (collectively the "Districts") and levies an annual assessment on property owners within each district to provide funding for maintenance of common area spaces; and WHEREAS, the City contracts with landscape firms to provide landscape maintenance services for the Districts; and WHEREAS, in the Request for Proposal, the common area spaces within these districts were placed into a single group, Bid Group 9; and WHEREAS, on May 20, 2020 City staff received responsive bids from Aztec Landscaping, Inc., Brightview Landscape Services, Cielo Azul Inc. dba Cielo Azul Landscape Maintenance, GeoCal Environmental Management & Landscaping, and NatureScape Services, Inc. respectively for Bid Group 9 as shown below: GeoCal Aztec BrightView Environmental Landscaping, Landscape Management& NatureScape Bid Group Inc. Services Cielo Azul Inc. Landscapin Services,, Inc. 9 $244)325.04 $181)829.28 $239)761.00 $220)332.20 $120,755.00 WHEREAS, after completion of the bids staff determined NatureScape Services, Inc. to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for Bid Group 9. NOW, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it accepts the bids and awards the open space landscape maintenance contract for Bid Group 9 to NatureScape Services, Inc. in the amount of$120,755. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that it approves the City of Chula Vista Contractor Services Agreement with NatureScape Services, Inc. to provide Landscape Maintenance Services, in the fopresented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept onfile in the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and directs the City Manager or their designee to execute the same. Presented by Approved as to form by Iracsema Quilantan Glen R. Goo ins Director of Public Works City Attorney C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Tei-np\BCL Technologies\easyPD F 8\((�,BCLC6�,08OE7417\(a,)BCLC(,�,08OE7417.doc 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 109 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA CONTRACTOR/SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NATURESCAPE SERVICES, INC. o PROVIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE S I VIC This Agreement is entered into effective as of June 23, 2020 ("Effective Date")by and between the City of Chula Vista, a chartered municipal corporation ("City") and NatureScape Services, Inc., a California Corporation ("Contractor/Service Provider") (collectively, the "Parties" and, individually, a ".pasty") with reference to the following facts: ECITALS WHEREAS, the City currently administers and maintains 50 Open Space Districts, Maintenance Community I aclltles Districts, and their associated zones (collectively the "Districts) and levies an annual assessment on property owners within each district to provide funding for maintenance of common area spaces; and WHEREAS, the Cit contracts with landscape provide landscape maintenance services for the � e :Arms to Disticts; and. WHEREAS, on May 1, 2020 City staff issued a Requet for Proposals for landscape rnaintenace services for common area spaces within O +pen Space Districts , , 9, 10, 11, and 26 and the common area spaces within these districts were placed into a single Bid Group , and. WHEREAS, on May 20, 2020 City staff received responsive bids from Aztec Landscaping, Inc., rightview Landscape Services, Cielo Azul Inc. dba Cielo Azul Landcape Maintenance, GeoCal Environmental Management & Landcapin , and NatureScape Service, Inc. respectively for Bid Group 9 as shown below: GeoCal Aztec Brightview Environmental Landscaping Landscape Management NatureScape Bid Cron Inc. Services Cielo Azul Inc & Landscaping Service Inc $2441325.04 $1811829.28 $239,761.00 $220,332.20 $120,755 WHEREAS, after complication of the bids staff determined NatureScape Services, Inc. to be the lowest responsive bidder for Bid Croup 9; and WHEREAS, staff recommended that the City Council accept the bids and award the landscape maintenance contract for Bid Group 9 to NautreScape Services, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 (July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2o21 w1 and WHEREAS, the City Council accepted the bids and ward the landscape maintenance contract for Bid Group 9 to NatureScape Services, Inc. on June 23, 2020; and WHEREAS, the intial terra for the Open Space landscape mainteance contract for Bid Group 9 is from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 and., upon satisfactory work performance, the parties may mutally agree to extend the contract for up to four(4) additional (1.) year periods from July 1. to June 0; and City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-a5() Consultant Name:�NatureScape services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1 10 of 768 WHEREAS, Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that it is experienced and staffed in a manner such that it can deliver the services required of Contractor/Service Provider to City in accordance with the time frames and the terms and conditions of this Agreement. [End of Recitals. Next Page Starts Obligatory Provisions.] 2 City o Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-056,� Consultant Name:NatureScape Services,IncJ Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 1 I I of 768 OBLIGATORY PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the Parties hereby acknowledge, City and Contractor/Service Provider hereby agree as follows: 1. SERVICES 1.0. Contract Documents. This Agreement consists of the following contract documents ("Contract Documents"), all of which are incorporated into and made! a part of this Agreement as if set forth in full: 1.0.1. This Agreement and all exhibits hereto, and any change orders, amendments, and supplemental agreements duly authorized and executed by authorized representatives of the City and Contractor. 1.0.2. All pen-nits for the Project. 1.0.3. The City of Chula Vista's Standard Special Provisions, Standard Special Provisions ("Greenbook" , Special Provisions, and Standard Plans. 1.0.4. All referenced specifications, plans, and materials. 1.0.5. The Pro J.ect's Notice to Bidders,Bid Requirements and Conditions,Bid Form, Special Provisions — General, Special Provisions—Technical, Bid General Provisions, and Open Space Landscape Maintenance Standards. 1.0.6. The successful bidder's bid documents submitted in response to the request for bid, and any post- bid documentation submitted prior to the award of the Project contract. 1.1 Required Services. Contractor/Service Provider agrees to perform the services, and deliver to City the "Deliverables" if any described in the attached Exhibit A,incorporated into the Agreement by this reference, within the time frames set forth therein,, time being of the essence for this Agreement. The services and/or Deliverables described in Exhibit A shall be referred to herein as the "Required Services." 1.2 Reductions in Scope of Work. City may independently, or upon request from Contractor/Service Provider, from time to time,reduce the Required Services to be performed by the Contractor/Service Provider under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Contractor/Service Provider agree to meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with the reduction. 1.3 Additional Services. Subject to compliance with the City's Charter, codes, policies, procedures and ordinances governing procurement and purchasing authority, City may request Contractor/Service Provider provide additional services related to the Required Services ("Additional Services"). If so, City and Contractor/Service Provider agree to meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of negotiating an amendment to Exhibit A, to add the Additional Services. Unless otherwise agreed, compensation for the Additional. Services shall be charged and paid consistent with the rates and terms already provided therein. Once added to Exhibit A, "Additional Services" shall also become "Required Services" for purposes of this Agreement. 3 Cit;of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-05()J Consultant Name:NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1]2 of 768 1.4 Standard of Care. Contractor/Service Provider expressly warrants and agrees that any and all Required Services hereunder shall be performed in accordance with the highest standard of care exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. 1.5 No Waiver of Standard of Care. Where approval by City is required, it is understood to be conceptual approval only and does not relieve the Co�ntractor/Service Provider of responsibility for complying with all laws, codes industry standards, and liability for damages caused by negligent acts, errors, omissions, noncompliance with industry standards, orthe willful misconduct of the Contractor/Service Provider or its subcontractors. 1.6 "Security for Performance. In the event that Exhibit A Section 4 indicates the need for Contractor/Service Provider to provide additional security for performance of its duties under this Agreement, Contractor/Service Provider shall provide such additional security prior to commencement of its Required Services in the form and on the terms prescribed on Exhibit A,or as otherwise prescribed by the City Attorney. 1.7 Compliance with Laws. In its performance of the Required Services, Contractor/Service Provider shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state and local laws, including the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 1.8 Business License. Prior to commencement of work, Contractor/Service Provider shall obtain a business license from City. 1.9 Subcontractors. Prior to commencement of any work, Contractor/Service Provider shall submit for City's information and approval a list of any and all subcontractors to be used by Contractor/Service Provider in the performance of the Required Services, Contractor/Service Provider agrees,to take appropriate measures necessary to ensure that all subcontractors and personnel utilized by the Contractor/Service Provider to complete its obligations under this Agreement comply with all applicable laws, regulations, ordinances, and policies, whether federal, state, or local. In addition, if any subcontractor is expected to fulfill any responsibilities of the Contractor/Service Provider under this Agreement, Contractor/Service Provider shall ensure that each and every subcontractor carries out the Contractor/Service Provider's responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement. 1.10 Term. This Agreement shall commence on the earlier to occur of the Effective Date or Contractor/Service Provider's commencement of the Required Services hereunder, and shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all their obligations hereunder;provided,however,provisions which expressly survive termination shall remain in effect. I COMPENSATION 2.1 General. For satisfactory performance of the Required Services, City agrees to compensate Contractor/Service Provider in the amount(s) and on the terms set forth in Exhibit A, Section 4. Standard terms for billing and payment are set forth in this Section 2. 2.2 Detailed Invoicing. Contractor/Service Provider agrees to provide City with a detailed invoice for services performed each month, within thirty (30) days of the end of the month in which the services were performed, unless otherwise specified in Exhibit A. Invoicing shall begin on the first of the month following the Effective Date of the Agreement. All charges must be presented in a line item format with each task separately explained in reasonable detail. Each invoice shall include the current monthly amount being billed, the amount invoiced to date, and the remaining amount available under any approved budget. 4 Cit;of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-05()1 Consultant Name:�NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1 3 of 768 Contractor/Service Provider must obtain prior written authorization from City for any fees or expenses that exceed the estimated budget. .3 Payment to Contractor/Service Provider. Upon receipt of a properly prepared invoice and confirmation that the Required Services detailed in the invoice have been satisfactorily perfoed, City shall pay Contractor/Service Provider for the invoice amount within thirty (30) days. Payment shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A and section 2.4, below. At City's discretion, invoices not timely submitted may be subject to a penalty of up to five percent(5%) of the amount invoiced. .4 Retention.Policy. City shall retain ten percent(10%)of the amount due for Required Services detailed on each invoice (the "holdback amount"). Upon City review and determination of Project Completion, the holdback amount will be issued to Contractor/Service Provider. .5 Reimbursement of Costs. City may reimburse Contractor/Service Provider's out-of--pocket costs incurred by Contractor/Service Provider in the performance of the Required Services if negotiated in advance and included. in Exhibit A. Unless specifically provided in Exhibit A, Contractor/Service Provider shall be responsible for any and all out-of-pocket costs incurred by Contractor/Service Provider in the performance of the Required Services. 2.6 Exclusions. City shall not be responsible for payment to Contractor/Service Provider for any fees or costs in excess of any agreed upon budget, rate or other maximum amount(s)provided for in Exhibit A. City shall also not be responsible for any cost: (a) incurred prior to the Effective ate; or (b) arising out of or related to the errors, omissions, negligence or acts of willful misconduct of Contractor/Service Provider, its agents, employees, or subcontractors. 2.7 Payment Not Final Approval. Contractor service Provider understands and agrees that payment to the Contractor/Service Provider or reimbursement for any Contractor/Service Provider costs related to the performance of Required Services does not constitute a City final decision regarding whether such payment or cost reimbursement is allowable and eligible for payment under this Agreement, nor does it constitute to a waiver of any violation by Contractor/Service Provider of the terms of this Agreement. If Citi determines that Contractor/Service Provider is not entitled to receive any amount of compensation already paid, City will notify Contractor/Service Provider in writing and Contractor/Service Provider shall promptly return such amount. 3. INSURANCE .1 Required Insurance. Contractor/Service Provider must procure and maintain, during the period of performance of Required Services under this Agreement, and for twelve e months after completion of Required Services, the policies of insurance described on. the attached Exhibit B, incorporated into the Agreement by this reference (the "Required Insurance"). The Required Insurance shall also comply with all other terms of this Section. 3.2 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions relating to the Required Insurance must be disclosed to and approved by City in advance of the commencement of work. 3.3 Standards for Insurers. Required Insurance must be placed with licensed insurers admitted to transact business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best's rating ofd.V or better, or, if insurance is placed with a surplus lines insurer, insurer must be listed on the State of California. List of Eligible Surplus Lines Cit;of Chula vista Agreement No.:2+Q2[1-a5� Consultant Name:�NatureScape services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page H 4 of 768 Insurers (LESLI) with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A X. For Workers' Compensation Insurance, insurance issued by the State Compensation Fund is also acceptable. 3.4 Subcontractors. Contractor/Service Provider must include all sub-Contractor/Service Providers/sub- contractors as insureds under its policies and/or furnish separate certificates and endorsements demonstrating separate coveragefor those not under its policies.Any separate coverage for sub-Contractor/Service Providers must also comply with the terms of this Agreement. 3.5 Additional Insureds. City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers must be named as additional insureds with respect to any policy of general liability, automobile, or pollution insurance specified as required in Exhibit B or as may otherwise be specified by City's Risk Manager.. The general liability additional insured coverage must be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor/Service Provider's insurance using ISO CG 2010 (11/85) or its equivalent; such endorsement must not exclude Products/Completed Operations coverage, 3.6 General Liability Coveravre to be "Primary." Contractor/Service Provider's general liability coverage must be primary insurance as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers is wholly separate from the insurance provided by Contractor/Service Provider and in no way relieves Contractor/Service Provider from its responsibility to provide insurance. 3.7 No Cancellation. No Required Insurance policy may be canceled by either Party during the required insured period under this Agreement,except after thirty days' prior written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested. Prior to the effective date of any such cancellation Contractor/Service Provider must procure and put into effect equivalent coverages), 3.8 Waiver of Subrogation. Contractor/Service Provider's insurer(s)will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for each Required Insurance policy under this Agreement. In addition, Contractor/Service Provider waives any right it may have or may obtain to subrogation for a claim against City. 3.9 Verification of Coverage. Prior to commencement of any work, Contractor/Service Provider shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and any amendatory endorsements necessary to demonstrate to City that Contractor/Service Provider has obtained the Required In in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The words"will endeavor" and"but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company, its agents, or representatives" or any similar language must be deleted from all certificates. The required certificates and endorsements should otherwise be on industry standard forms,. The City reserves the right to require, at any time, complete, certified copies, of all required insurance policies, including endorsements evidencing the coverage required by these specifications. 3.10 Claims Made PolicyR,e,quirements. If General Liability,Pollution and/or Asbestos Pollution Liability and/or Errors & Omissions coverage are required and are provided on a claims-made fon-n, the following requirements also apply: a. The "Retro Date"must be shown, and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of the work required by this Agreement. b. Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided, for at least five (5) years after completion of the work required by this Agreement. (i Cit;of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-05()1 Consultant Name:�NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1 5 of 768 c. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a "Retro, Date" prior to the effective date of this Agreement, the Contractor/Service Provider must purchase"extended reporting"coverage for a minimum of five(5)years after completion of the work required by this Agreement. d. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review. 3.11 Not a Limitation of Other Obligations. Insurance provisions under this section shall not be construed to limit the Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Agreement, including Indemnity. 3.12 Additional Coverage. To the extent that insurance coverage provided by Contractor/Service Provider maintains higher limits than the minimums appearing in Exhibit B, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for higher limits maintained. 4. INDEMNIFICATION 4.1. General. To the maximum extent allowed by law, Contractor/Service Provider shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collectively, "Indemnified Parties"), from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, (including reasonable attorneys,' fees and court costs), liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts,, omissions, negligence, or willful misconduct of Contractor/Service Provider, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and contractors, arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Required Services, the results of such performance, or this Agreement. This indemnity provision does not include any claims, damages, liability, costs and expenses arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Also covered is liability arising from, connected with, caused by or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Indemnified Parties which may be in combination with the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Contractor/Service Provider, its employees, agents or officers, or any third party. 4.2. Modified Indemnity here Agreement Involves Desi,gn Professional Services. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if the services provided under this Agreement are design professional services, as defined by California Civil Code section 2782.8,, as may be amended from time to time, the defense and indemnity obligation under Section 1, above, shall be limited to the extent required by California Civil Code section 2782.8. 4.3 Costs of Defense and Award. Included in Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Section 4 is Contractor/Service Provider's obligation to defend, at Contractor/Service Provider's own cost, expense and risk, any and all suits, actions or other legal proceedings that maybe brought or instituted against one or more of the Indemnified Parties. Subject to the limitations in this Section 4, Contractor/Service Provider shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against one or more of the Indemnified Parties for any and all related legal expenses and costs incurred by any of them. 4.4. Contractor/Service Provider's Obligations Not Limited or Modified. Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Section 4 shall not be limited to insurance proceeds, if any,received by the Indemnified Parties, or by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Contractor/Service Provider. Furthermore, Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Section 4 shall in no way limit, modify or excuse any of Contractor/Service Provider's other obligations, or duties under this Agreement. 7 Cit;of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-05()J Consultant Name:�NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1 6 of 768 . . Enforcement Costs. Contractor/Service Provider agrees to pay any and all costs City incurs in. enforcing Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Section 4. .6 Survival. Contractor/Service Provider's obligations under this Section 4 shall survive the termination. of this Agreement.l . FINANCIAL L INTERESTS OF CONTRACTORIS,ERVICE PROVIDED. .1 Form 700 Filing. The California Political Reform Act and the Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code rewire certain government officials and Contractor/Service Providers performing work for government agencies to publicly disclose certain of their personal assets and income using a Statement of Economic Interests farm (Form 00). In order to assure compliance with these requirements, Contractor/Service Provider shall comply with the disclosure requirements identified in the attached Exhibit C, incorporated into the Agreement by this reference. . Disclosures; Prohibited Interests. Independent of whether Contractor/Service Provider is required to file a Form. 7aa, Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that it has disclosed to City any economic interests held by Contractor/Service Provider, or its employees or subcontractors who will be performing the Required Services, in any real property or project which is the subject of this Agreement. Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Contractor/Service Provider, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Contractor/Service Provider, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Contractor/Service Provider further warrants and represents that no officer or employee of City, has any " whether contractual non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds hereof, interest, , �� , financial�. or in the business of Contractor/Service Provider or Contractor/Service Provider's subcontractors. Contractor/Service Provider further agrees to notify City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by lav or this Agreement. For breach or violation of any of these warranties, City shall have the right to rescind this .Agreement without liability. 6. REMEDIES .1 'Termination for Cause. If for any reason whatsoever Contractor/Service Provider shall fail toperforms the Required Services under this Agreement, in a proper or timer manner, or if Contractor/Service Prodder shall violate any of the other covenants, agreements or conditions of this Agreement each a "Default"), in addition to any and all other rights and remedies City may have under this Agreement, at law or in equity, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving five 5) days written notice to Contractor/Service Provider. Such notice shall identify the Default and the Agreement termination date. If Contractor/Service Provider notifies City of its intent to cure such.Default prior to City's specified termination date, and City agrees that the specified Default is capable of being cured, City may grant Contractor/Service Provider up to tern (10) additional days after the designated termination date to effectuate such cure. In the event of a termination under this Section 6.1, Contractor/Service Provider shall immediately provide City any and all "Work Product" (defined in Section 7 below) prepared by Contractor/Service Provider as part of the Required Services. Such work Product shall be City's sole and exclusive property as provided in Section 7 hereof: Contractor/Service :Provider may be entitled to compensation for work satisfactorily performed prior to Contractor/Service Provider's receipt of the Default notice provided, however, in no event shall such compensation sation exceed the amount that would have been payable under this Agreement for such work, and any City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-05C Consultant Name:lNaturescape services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1].7 of 768 such compensation shall be reduced by any costs incurred or projected to be incurred by City as a result of the Default. 6.2 Termination or Suspension for Convenience of City. City may suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion of the Required Services, at any time and for any reason, with or without cause, by giving specific written notice to Contractor/Service Provider of such termination or suspension at least fifteen (15) days prior to the effective date thereof. Upon receipt of such notice, Contractor/Service Provider shall immediately cease all work under the Agreement and promptly deliver all"Work Product"(defined in Section 7 below) to City. Such Work Product shall be City's sole and exclusive property as provided in Section 7 hereof. Contractor/Service Provider shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for this Work Product in an amount equal to the amount due and payable under this Agreement for work satisfactorily performed as of the date of the termination/suspension notice plus any additional remaining Required Services requested or approved by City in advance that would maximize City's value under the Agreement. 6.3 Waiver of Claims. In the event City terminates the Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Section, Contractor/Service Provider hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation as a result of such termination except as expressly provided in this Section 6'. 6.4 Administrative Claims, Requirements, and Procedures. No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this Agreement against City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with City and acted upon by City in accordance with the procedures, set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may be amended,the provisions of which, including such policies and procedures used by City in the implementation of same, are incorporated herein by this reference. Upon request by City, Contractor/Service Provider shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. 6.5 Governing Law/Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in San Diego County, State of California. 6.6 'Service of Process. Contractor/Service Provider agrees that it is subject to personal jurisdiction in California. If Contractor/Service Provider is a foreign corporation, limited liability company, or partnership that is not registered with the California Secretary of State, Contractor/Service Provider irrevocably consents to service of process on Contractor/Service Provider by first class mail directed to the individual and address listed under"For Legal Notice,"in section I.B. of Exhibit A to this Agreement, and that such service shall be effective five days after mailing. 7. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF WORK PRODUCT All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement in connection with the performance of the Required Services (collectively "Work Product") shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such Work Product shall.be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Contractor/Service Provider in the United States or in any other country without the express,prior written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such Work Product,without requiring any permission of Contractor/Service Provider, except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act or expressly prohibited by other applicable laws. With respect to computer files containing data generated as Work Product, Contractor/Service Provider shall make 9 Cit;of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-05()J Consultant Name:�NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1]8 of 768 available to City, upon reasonable written request by City, the necessary functional computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. GENERAL PROVISIONS 8.1 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended, but only in writing signed by both Parties. 8.2 Assignment. City would not have entered into this Agreement but for Contractor/Service Provider's unique qualifications and traits. Contractor/Service Provider shall not assign any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement, nor any part hereof, without City's prior written consent, which City may grant, condition or deny in its sole discretion. 8.3 Authority. The person(s), executing this Agreement for Contractor/Service Provider warrants and represents that they have the authority to execute same on behalf of Contractor/Service Provider and to bind Contractor/Service Provider to its obligations hereunder without any further action or direction from Contractor/Service Provider or any board, principle or officer thereof. 8.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts., each of which shall be deemed an original,but all of which shall constitute one Agreement after each Party has signed such a counterpart. 8.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement together with all exhibits attached hereto and other agreements expressly referred to herein, constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein. All exhibits referenced herein shall be attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, warranties and statements, oral or written, are superseded. 8.6 Record Retention. During the course of the Agreement and for three (3) years following completion of the Required Services, Contractor/Service Provider agrees to maintain, intact and readily accessible, all data, documents,, reports, records, contracts, and supporting materials, relating to the performance of the Agreement, including accounting for costs and expenses charged to City, including such records in the possession of sub-contractors/sub-Contractor/Service Providers. 8.7 Further Assurances. The Parties agree to perform such further acts and to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the provisions of this Agreement and the intentions, of the Parties. 8.8 Independent Contractor. Contractor/Service Provider is and shall at all, times remain as to City a wholly independent contractor. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor/Service Provider or any of Contractor/Service Provider's officers, employees, or agents ("Contractor/Service Provider Related Individuals"), except as set forth in this Agreement. No Contractor/Service Provider Related Individuals shall be deemed employees of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled, including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. Furthermore, City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax with respect to any Contractor/Service Provider Related Individuals; instead, Contractor/Service Provider shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and shall hold the City harmless with respect to same. Contractor/Service Provider shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its Contractor/Service Provider Related Individuals are employees or agents of City. Contractor/Service Provider to City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-05()J Consultant Name:NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1 9 of 768 shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatsoever against City, or bind City in any manner. 8.9 Notices. All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any Party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such Party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified in this Agreement at the places of business for each of the designated Parties as indicated in Exhibit A, or otherwise provided in writing. (End. of page. Next page is signature page.) City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-056,� Consultant Name:�NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 120 of 768 SIGNATURE PAGE CONTRACTOR/SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, by executing this Agreement where indicated below, City and Contractor/Service Provider agree that they have read and understood all terms and conditions of the Agreement, that they fully agree and consent to bound by same, and that they are freely entering into this Agreement as of the Effective Date. NATURE CAPE SERVICES,, INC. CITY OF CHULA VISTA BY: BY: RANDY BATES MARIA KACHADOORIAN Chief Operating Officer CITY MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Glen R. Goo ins City Attorney 12 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-056,� Consultant Name:NatureScape services,IncJ Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 121 of 768 EXHIBIT SCOPE OF WORK ANIS PAYMENT T: MS 1. Contact People for Contract Administration and Legal Notice A. City Contract Administration Iracsema Quilantan Director of Public Works 1 OO Maxwell Road, Chula.Vista, CA 91911. 619-397"-6066 Iuilantan chulavistaca. o For Legal Notice Copy to: City of Chula Nista. City Attorney 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 919 1 O 619-691-5037 7 CityAttomey@chulavistaca.gov B. Contractor/Service Provider Contract Administration: IATURES APE SERVICES, INC. Randy Bates, Chief Operating Officer 19- 1-719 ,8575 Aero Drive, San.Diego, CA 92123 For Legal.Notice Copy to Sarah Reyes, Chief Financial Officer/Office Manager 575 ...Aero Drive, San Diego, CA 9212 619-261-7195 sarah@naturescapeinc.us 2. Required Services A. General Description: The Contractor shall perform landscape maintenance and other required services for Open Space Bid Croup 9 in accordance with the Contract Documents. B. Retailed Description: 'he Contractor shall furnish and provide all. labor, materials, equipment, tools, facilities, skill., and services necessary to complete, in a good and workmanlike manner, all landscape maintenance and other required services for Opera Space Bid Croup 9 as provided by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall furnish and provide such services at the staffing levels, frequencies, and locations identified in the Contract Documents, as arca ended. . Term: In accordance with. Section 1.10 of this Agreement, the term„ ofthis Agreement shall begin .luly 1, 2020 and end on June 30, 2021 for completion of all Required Services. 4. CompensationThe annual contract amount for completion ofthe Required Services in each laid group and district is reflected on the table below: 113 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-056 Consultant Name:�NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 1.22 of 768 NatureScape Services, Inc. GROUP DISTRICT BID/CONTRACT AMOUNT 9 Open Space District 5 $ 11,384.00 9 Open Space District 6 $ 51399.00 9 Open Space District 9 $ 141340.00 9 Open Space District 10 $ 21,511.00 9 Open Space District 11 $ 64,754.00 9 Open Space District 26 $ 2.0767.00 TOTAL GROUP 9 $ 1201755.00_ A. For of Compensation As full compensation for completion of the Required Services, the City shall pay Contractor for the quantity or percentage of line item of work actually performed in accordance with the Contract Documents. The City's obligation to pay Contractor under this Agreement is subject to and may be offset by charges that apply to the Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall honor the above line item unit costs through June 30, 2021. B. Reimbursement of Costs Z Invoiced or agreed-upon amounts as follows: The City will compensate the Contractor for materials used in the repair of irrigation damage in accordance with the Contract Documents. � Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum amount to be paid to the Contractor/Service Provider for services performed through June 30, 202$ shall not exceed$800,000.00�. 5. Special Provisions: Z Permitted Sub-Contractor/Service Providers: None.� Z Security for Performance: Contractor shall procure Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for the Required Services. Such bonds, are to be issued by a Surety authorized to transact such business in the State of California and listed as approved by the United States Department of Treasury Circular 570 with an underwriting limitation sufficient to issue bonds, in the amount required by the Agreement. Approved entities are listed on the United States Department of Treasury's website— www.fsca.l.treasur ov/fsre orts/ref/suret end/c 70.htm Any renewal certificates required during the course of the Agreement must be renewed and received by the City within fifteen (1 5) days prior to expiration and must meet the same criteria No substitutions shall be allowed. Z Notwilb standing the completion date set forth in Section 3 above, City has option to extend this Agreement for four(4)'additional terms, defined as a one-year increment or I July I to June 30�. The City Manager or Director of Finance/Treasurer shall be authorized to exercise the extensions on behalf of the City. If the City exercises an option to extend, each extension shall be on the same terms and conditions contained herein, provided that the amounts specified in Section 4 above may be increased by up to the change in the annual San Diego Area Consumer Price index (C.P:I-W), in an amount not to exceed 5%, for each extension. The City shall, give written iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilI iiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilill�illillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilililI 14 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-05()1 Consultant Name:NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 123 of 768 notice to Contractor/Service Provider of the City's election to exercise the extension via the Notice of Exercise of Option to �xten document. Such notice provided at fast days to expiration ifthe term. 0 DIR/ revail ng Waw Contractor and its subcontractors of every tier shall comply with all Federal and State law prevailing wage requirements for all persons employed to perform the Required Services, including but not limited to payment of prevailing wages at the specified rates. The prevailing wage rates are determined by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and are available at the Cit and on t e DI 's website. �ep y Prior to commencing the Required Services, the Contractor shall provide the City with a list of Its subcontractors and the classifications and wages of workers that will be employed to perform the Required Services. If Contractor desires to modify the list during the term of the Agreement, Contractor shall immediately provide an updated list to the City. To verify compliance with State prevailing wage requirements. Contractor shall be registered with the DIR's online registration of contractors and shall furnish and submit certified payrolls and other require documentation directly to the DIR. Contractor and its subcontractors of every tier shall comply with all requirements of Labor Code section 1776. This Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR pursuant to Labor Code section. 1.771.4. In addition to Federal and State law prevailing wage requirements, Contractor shall also comply with the following in its performance of the Required Services: • Labor Code 1810: Hours in legal dais' work; • Labor Code 1.81. : Penalty for exceeding legal days' work. and • Labor Code 1.81.5; one and one-half time rate of pay. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that a failure to comply with any requirements of this section authorizes the City to withhold payments under the .Agreement. Nothing contained in, or not contained in, this section shall be construed to in any way limit Contractor's obligations to comply with any applicable Federal, State, or local law or regulation. Em to ent of A rentices Contractor and its subcontractors of every vier shall comply with all requirements for employment of apprentices as provided by any applicable law or regulation, including but not limited.to Labor Code sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7. Information regarding apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the DIFF.. Non-Collusion Affidavit Prior to commencing the Required Services, Contractor shall provide a fully executed and properly notarized Non-Collusion.Affidavit, in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit D. Workers' Cgmpensation Insurance Declaration Prior to commencing the Required Services, Contractor shall provide a fully executed and properly notarized Worker's Compensation Insurance Declaration, in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E. 15 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-a5() Consultant Name:lNaturescape services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1.24 of 768 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor/Service provider shall adhere to all terms and conditions of Section 3 of the Agreement and agrees to provide the fallowing types and minimum amounts of insurance, as indicated by checking the applicable boxes W. Type of Insurance Minimum Amount Form O General ability. $2,000,000 per occurrence for Insurance Services office Dorm. Including products and bodily injury, personal injury CG 00 01 completed operations, (including death), and property personal and damage. If Commercial General. advertising injury Liability insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit must apply separately to this Agreement or the general aggregate limit must be trice the required occurrence limit Additional Insured Endorsement *Must be primary and must not or Blanket AT Endorsement for exclude.P` uctslCompleted city* Operations Waiver of Recovery Endorsement 0 Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per accident for bodily Insurance Services Office dorm. injury, including death, and CA 00 01 property damage Code 1-Any Auto "ode 8-Mired Code 9-Non Owned Workers' 1,000,000 each accident Compensation 1,000,000 disease policy limit Employer's Liability 1,000,000 disease each employee Waiver of Recovery Endorsement Other Negotiated Insurance Terms: None ,K6 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-056 Consultant Name:lNaturescape services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 1.25 of 768 EXHIBIT C CONTRACTOR/SERVICE PROVIDER CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION The Political Reform Asti and the Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code2 ("Code") require designated state and local government officials,including some Contractor/Service Providers,to make certain public disclosures using a Statement of Economic Interests form (Form. 700). Once filed, a Form 700 is a public document, accessible to any member of the public. In addition, Contractor/service Providers designated to file the Form foo are also required to comply with certain ethics training requirements. A. Contractor/Service Provider IS a corporation or limited liability company and is therefore EXCLUDED from disclosure. 0 B. Contractor/Service Provider is NOT a corporation or limited liability company and disclosure designation is as follows: APPLICABLE DESIGNATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL(S)) ASSIGNED D T O PROVIDE SERVICES (Category descriptions available at www.chulavistaca. civ deaura eats/cit - �� o ct-,o st- ' .,� Name Email Address 'icato.l es nation Enter Name of Each Individual Enter email address(es) • A�.. Full Diseclosure Who Will Be Providing Service Under the Contract—If El B. Limited Disclosure (select one or more of individuals havei fere t the categories under which the Contractor shall disclosure requirements, fi le). duplicate this row and El1. El 2. El 3. El 4. El 5. El 6. 7. complete separatelyfi)r each individual Justification: El C. Excluded from Disclosure I.1 equired Filers Each individual who will be performing services for the City pursuant to the Agreement and who meets the definition of"Contractor/Service Provider,"pursuant to FPPC Regulation 18700.3,must file a Form 700. 2.Required Filing Deadlines Each initial Form loo required under this Agreement shall be failed with the Office of the City Clerk via the City's online filing system,Neffile, within 30 days of the approval of the Agreement. Additional For 700 filings will be required annually on April 1 during the term of the Agreement, and within 30 days of the termination of the Agreement. 1 Filing Designation The City Department Director will designate each individual who will be providing services to the City pursuant to the Agreement as full disclosure, limited disclosure, or excluded from disclosure, based on an analysis of the services the Contractor/Service Provider will. provide. Notwithstanding this designation or anything in the Agreement., the Contractor/Service Provider is ultimately responsible for complying with F PPC regulations and filing requirements. If you have any questions regarding filing requirements,please do not hesitate to contact the City Clerk at(61,9)691-504 1, or the F P"P'C at I-866-ASIS.- "PPC, or(866),275-3772 *2.. 1 Cal. Dov. Code §§8 1O0t seq.;:PPC de s. 18700.3 and 18704. 2 Chula Vista Municipal Code §2.02.010-2.02.040. 3 Cal. Gov. Code §§53234,et seq. 4 CA FPPC Adv.A-15-147 (Chadwick)(2015);Davis v. Fresno Jn fied Schaal.District(20 15)237 Cal.App.4"26 1;FPP,C Reg. 18700.3 (Consultant defined as an"individual"who participates in making a governmental decision; "individual"'does not include corporation or limited liability company). iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillilillillilililI 7 City+ u Vista Agreement T .020-05( Consultant Name:�NatureScape services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1.26 of 768 Pursuant to the duly adoped City of Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code,this document shall serve as the written determination of the Contractor's requirement to comply with the disclosure requirements set forth in the Code. Completed byTessa Nguyen, Senior Management Analyst iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillilliillilI iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilli�illillillillillillilliillilliillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilI 1,8 City o Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-056,� Consultant Name:�NatureScape Services,IncJ Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 127 of 768 EXHIBIT D NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT To the City of Chula Nista, Director of Public Works. The undersigned, in submitting a bid for performing the following work by Contract being duly sworn,, deposes and says: That he/she has not, either directly or indirectly entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding and has not accepted any deposit from any subcontractor or material supplier through any bid depository, the by-laws, rules, and regulations of which. prohibit or prevent the Contractor for considering any bid from any subcontractor or material supplier, which is not processed through said bid depositary, or which prevent any subcontractor or material supplier from bidding to any Contractor who does not use the facilities or accept bids from or through such bid depository in connection with this Contract. Business Address Company :Place of Residence Signature of Bidder (Attach Proper Notarization) K 9 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-056 Consultant Name:lNaturescape services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 1.28 of 768 EXHIBIT D NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT To the City of Chula Vista, Director of Public Works: The undersigned, in submitting a bid for performing the following work by Contract being duly sworn, deposes and says: That he/she has not, either directly or indirectly entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding and has not accepted any deposit from any subcontractor or material supplier through any bid depository, the by-,laws, rules, and regulations of which prohibit or prevent the Contractor for considering any bid from any subcontractor or material supplier, which is not processed through said bid depository, or which prevent any subcontractor or material supplier from bidding to any Contractor who does not use the facilities or accept bids from or through such bid depository in connection with this Contract. Business Address Company Place of Residence Signature of Bidder (Attach Proper Notarization) 210 City of Chula Vista Agreement No.:2020-056,� Consultant Name:�NatureScape Services,lnc., Rev. 10/24/17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 129 of 768 ,111111,1w , CITY of CHULA VISTA BID N[J1V"IBER B26-19/20 Page 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Open Space Division Landscape Maintenance Performance Standards Overview These principles describe landscape maintenance performance standards for maintaining designated open space districts in a safe, attractive, and usable condition. Included in these standards are criteria covering irrigation; proper installation, care, and trimming of shrubs and g , plant diseases and pests; mowing; brush roue covers, ertl lz�atlon" wee control; eradication o clearance, maintenance and repair of irrigation and drainage systems, fences, pathways and trails, walls, bollards, gates, benches, dog stations, bridges, and lighting. The Contractor shall furnish all labor, equipment, materials, tools, services, incidentals, and special skills required to perform the landscape maintenance, including routine debris and trash removal, as set forth in these specifications. This contract is a Minimum Staffing requirement contract. The Contractor shall be paid based upon their performance and compliance with the provisions of this contract. Traffic Control and Access All traffic control shall be done in accordance with the latest edition of the Manual of Traffic Controls prepared by the California Department of Transportation. Contractor shall comply with all state and local regulations regarding lane and street closures in performance of work. The Contractor is resp plans, devices, and permits. The responsible or obtaining a traffic control Contractor shall work in full conformity with time State ofCalifornia Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance work Zones and the City of Chula Vista Standards and Specifications. Traffic control devices shall be installed, maintained, and removed by an "A"' or "C31" licensed contractor. pull compensation for performing all the work necessary to comply with these provisions is considered included in the contract unit prices aid for various items of work; no additional compensation will be allowed. Safety Standards Blocking of public streets shall not be permitted unless prior arrangements have been made with the City's Department of Engineering cerin, Capital Projects and duly approved. Traffic Control Plans and permits have been obtained. The Contractor is responsible to have vehicles moved during arboriculture work. The Contractor shall provide adequate barricades, flag person(s), signs, and warning devices during the performance of the Contract to protect motorists and pedestrians. All placements of cores, signs, and barricades must conforrn to the American Traffic Safety Standards. Flashing lights mounted on a vehicle shall not be deemed as sufficient or adequate protection. Debris and Chip Disposal. Disposal of all debris generated by work described within this contract will be the responsibility of the contractor. All landscape maintenance debris must be removed before the close of business each day; there must be no landscape maintenance debris left on a work site overnight. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 130 of 768 ,111111,1w , CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page All trimmings and their disposal shall become the responsibility of the Contractor. Trimmings shall be legally disposed of at an authorized disposal site. Unit prices quoted for services in this contract by contractor shall include all labor, traffic control, equipment, materials, insurance, p p p pervasion, transportation, and permit an license fees, disposal costs, profit, overhead,� su applicable sales tax. No other compensation will be allowed. Work Schedule The Contractor shall accomplish all normal landscape maintenance required between the hours of :30 a.m. and. 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. No maintenance functions that generate excess noise that would cause annoyance to residents of the area shall start before 8:00 a.m., except in the case of a situation deemed emergency in nature. Routine landscape maintenance that will be performed within the South Bay Bus lapid Transit (SBBRT) corridor will be done during the regular work hours, in coordination with Public works. The Contractor must establish a daily eight-hour work schedule, with a minimum of six hours on site which equipment corresponds to City-definedminimum manpower an resource requirements. The Contractor shall send a Daily Attendance Rester, which is to include the information on all present and missing staff members, to the open Space Inspection staff by 9:00 a.m. each working day. The Contractor will be provided the opportunity and procedure for adjusting these schedules to meet special circumstances. The contractor shall provide a Monthly Maintenance Report detailing the prior month's work activities in each District. Failure to complete any work as scheduled or as specified herein will result in the following actions: a. The sum of Three Hundred Fifty Dollars ($350) per daffy will be deducted by the City and be forfeited by the Contractor from payments to the Contractor for each instance where an item of work is not completed in accordance with schedule or specifications. b. Deficiencies: An additional amount equal to the costs incurred by completion of the work by an alternate source, whether it be City forces or separate private contractor, even if it exceeds the contract unit price, will be deducted. c. The actions outlined in "a" and "b" above shall not be construed as penalty but as adjustment of payment to the Contractor for only the work actually performed or as the cast to the City for inspection and other related costs from the failure by the Contractor to complete the work according to schedule. d. Holidays: The City is closed and the Contractor shall observe the following City hard holidays: • New Year's Day .January I • Martin Luther.King Day -Third Monday in January • Cesar Chavez Day - March or as observed by the City) • Memorial Day—Last Monday in May • Independence Day—July • Labor Day—First Monday in September 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 131 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page • Veterans day—November l 1. • Thanksgiving Day—Fourth Thursday in November • lay after Thanksgiving Day • Christmas lay—December 25 Public Convenience The Contractor shall conduct the work at all times in a manner which will not interfere with normal pedestrian traffic on adjacent sidewalks or vehicular traffic on adjacent streets or roadways. Notification The Contractor shall provide written notice to the City listing exact starting dates of fertilization and other infrequent operations such as tree trimming, brow ditch clearing, etc. Such notice shall. be furnished to the Director of Public works or designee at least ten (1 0) working days in advance of the starting date. City approval is required prior to commencement of work. Irrigation The contractor shall have the ability to monitor and respond to web-based and other Central Irrigation Systems, Irrigation shall be done by the use of manual and/or automated systems,, ..ere available and operable; however, failure of the exlstin 1rr1 Ratlon system to provide full and proper coverage shall not relieve the Contractor of this res ons,ib lite All areas not adequately covered by a manual and/or automated sprinkler system shall be irrigated by a portable irrigation method. The Contractor shall furnish all hoses, nozzles, sprinklers, tools, equipment, and materials necessary to accomplish this supplementary irrigation. Care shall be exercised to prevent a waste of water, erosion, and detrimental seepage into existing underground improvements or structures. When negligence on the part of the Contractor results it excessive use or waste of irrigation water, water that is used in excess of the monthly budgeted amount maybe estimated, with the cost of the excess water deducted from the contract payment. The City shall be the sole judge of what constitutes "excessive use"' or"waste of irrigation water". Any damages to public or private property resulting from excessive irrigation or irrigation water run-off shall be charged against the contract payment unless the Contractor makes immediate repairs to the satisfaction of the Director of Public works or designee. The Contractor shall turn off all irrigation controllers during periods of rain and tura, the irrigation controllers back on and reprogram them at the end of each rainy period. Periods during which the irrigation controllers are programmed off do not vacate the Contractor's responsibility to inspect, monitor, and repair the irrigation systems. The Contractor shall keep irrigation controllers, electric meters, pull boxes, and valve boxes clear of plant material., soil, debris, and pests. The Contractor shall maintain the systems throughout the work site at no additional cost to the City. The systems maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the replacements, repairs, adjustments, raising or lowering, straightening, and any other operation required for the continued efficient operation of the systems. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 132 of 768 ,111111,1w , CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page The City will compensate the Contractor for:materials used in the repair of irrigation damaged by vandalism, theft, disappearance or wear and tear of irrigation components through normal use. Contractor will be reimbursed for parts and up to 10% handling casts on approved irrigation repair invoices. Labor, tools, equipment, an other overhead expenses are considered to be included in the contract amount bid to maintain each pertinent open Space district. Upon receipt of an approved invoice from the Contractor itemizing the materials involved, payment will be processed in accordance with established terms. The Contractor will be responsible for monitoring and maintaining irrigation parts costs within the established budget for each pertinent Open Space district. Any necessary parts purchases that may exceed the annual budget for parts in a District :must have pre-approval from the Inspector for the District or risk non-payment. The City reserves the right to designate suppliers for these repair materials. written report shall be submitted by the Contractor for al.loccurrences of vandalism, theft, disappearance or worn out irrigation components, detailing the quantity, size, and location no later than five ) working days after the discovery of such occurrence. Contractor's failure to meet this requirement will result in Contractor's responsibility for total repair costs. The Contractor shall inspect, at least once each week, the operation of the irrigation system for any malfunction. Any replacement must conform to the type and :kind of existing system. The Director of Public Works or designee must approve, in writing, any deviation from the existing hype. The Contractor shall, at time beginning of the maintenance period, inspect the entire sprinkler system with the City's representative to become familiar with the locations of valves, heads, controllers, electric valves, rasters, and lose bibs.. Special attention shall be directed to the maintenance ace of sprinkler equipment. Risers shall be adjusted by extension, restaked as needed, and relocated as plant material grows up or spreads out in a way that adversely affects the performance of the sprinklers. The Contractor shall promptly repair any damage to, or malfunction of, the irrigation system. At no time will systems be shut down for extended periods—re �a.irs are to be made as soon as discovered and reported. Required Irrigation. deports Pull and complete irrigation systems check, including a mainline leaf test and a meter reading, shall be performed monthly. This information shall, be included in time monthly irrigation report on the Irrigation Check Sheet. In addition to the Monthly Irrigation Check Sheet, the Contractor shall provide MonthlylAnnual Units Used Per.Meter .Report (a spreadsheet showing cumulative monthly water usage for each. water meter) and the .end of The .Month .teeter Reach. These forms will 'be provided to the Contractor. All monthly reports and any repair invoices for parts and handling from the prior month shall be submitted to the open Space Inspector for each area by the fifth da of each month, prior to 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 133 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page authorization of monthly Maintenance payments. The City may require a change in the irrigation schedule at any time for water conservation. The contractor shall be responsible or input and maintenance of irrigation schedules and programs as directed by the City. Declaimed water The Contractor will be responsible for following all local, state, and federal laws related to reclaimed water irrigation installation and operation. This shall include any fees and/or fines incurred. The Contractor shall have a Reclaimed Water Site Supervisor Certificate from the local water purveyor. The Reclaimed water Site Supervisor is responsible for reviewing all reclaimed water systems for compliance with water purveyor's regulations. Water Conservation The Contractor shall abide by any and all water conservation programs currently in effect by the guidelines,mater purveyor, and �' i e responsible or compliance with any emergency� y . rules, and regulations effected during water crises. The consequences of failure to observe, obey, and comply with the aforementioned emergency guidelines, rules, and regulations will be the financial responsibility of the Contractor. For example, negligent or delayed irrigation system. maintenance producing water waste which results in citations or fines by the water purveyor will be the responsibility of the Contractor. Irrigation scheduling programs will be set by the Department of Public works or a representative. Any changes es iii.programming must be done with prior City approval. Irrigating Trees and Shrubs The City at its sole option may decide to plant new trees or other landscape material within the maintained area. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing adequate supplemental irrigation following planting to facilitate new ;growth during the establishment period. The Contractor at no additional, cost to the City shall provide additional, weed control, irrigation maintenance, and plant maintenance required until plants are established. Maintaining Shrubs and Groundco ers All shrubs and groundcovers growing in the work area shall be pruned, as required, to maintain plants in a healthy growing condition.. Damaged or dead limbs or branches shall be removed immediately and all pruning cuts shall be made properly and cleanly with sharp pruning tools, with no projections or stubs remaining. All plant pruning shall be accomplished in a manner which will. permit the plants to grow naturally in accordance with their normal growth characteristics. Shrubs used as formal hedges or screens shall be pruned as required to present a neat appearance. A formal hedge, whether new or established, shall be tapered so that it is wider at the bottom than the top, ensuring the lower part will ,get the sunlight it heeds for healthy growth.. Spent blossoms and dead flower stalks shall be removed as required to present a neat and clean 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 134 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page f appearance. Shrubs and mounding plants shall not exceed two feet (2') in height within areas required for vehicular sight clearance depending upon roadway topography and alignment. The Contractor shall: • Frim groundcovers adjacent to walls, walls, and fences as required for general containment to present a neat, clean appearance. • Keep groundcovers trimmed back from all controller units, valve boxes, quick couplers, fixtures, and other appurtenances. • Not allow groundcovers to grow up trees, into shrubs, or on structures or walls. • Deeproan .covers trimmed ac approximately four inches (4'') from structures or walls. • Coordinate trimming around base of shrubs and trees with the City Representative. Weed and Pest Control All landscaped spaces within the specified maintenance area shall be kept Free of weeds at all. tines. This means that complete removal of all weed growth shall be accomplished on a continual basis as weeds appear, and not just once every 30 days. weeds shall be controlled by manual, mechanical, or chemical methods. Effective pest control, including the control of snails and vertebrate pests such as gophers, squirrels, voles/moles, and all such shall be performed in a safe manner for maximum control and also to minimize exposure of the environment to chemicals. Weed and pest controls must include the use of integrated pest management t (IPM) practices wherever possible.e. Monitoring of populations an natural and cultural practices to promote healthy,, pest-resistant plant material are just a few examples of techniques that can be employed to minimize and augment chemical methods. Pesticides shall 'be applied at appropriate times which limit the possibility of environmental contamination through climatic or other factors and at the proper life cycle stage of the pests. Early morning application shall be used when possible to avoid environmental contamination from drift. Application ofall pesticides shall be supervised by State-licensed Pest Control Operators or Qualified Applicator License (QAL) holders. Weed control chemicals shall be approved by the City prior to application. The Contractor i responsible for obtaining and maintaining site-specific written recommendations from a Pesticide Advisor prior to any ,applications. The Contractor is also responsible for all chemical use reporting required by the .Department of Pesticide regulation (TP ..) in any area where herbicide or pesticide application will tale place. Safety Data Sheets (Blas) are required for all proposed chemical applications. The contractor shall submit monthly pesticide use reports with monthly invoices. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 135 of 768 ,111111,1w , CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 7 All noxious plant materials such as, but not limited to, poison oaf, wild mustard, pampas grass, tamarix, Arundo cane, and tumbleweeds shall be removed immediately by hand. All pathways, sidewalks, curbs, and gutters shall be kept free of weeds by use of contact weed control chemicals. Weed grasses as well as broadleaf weeds shall be kept out of shrubs and groundcovers. Weeds and plant materials removed shall be disposed off-site by the Contractor in a manner consistent with Federal, State, and Local roles and regulations. Turf and other plants killed by weeds, chemicals, and pests shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. All replacements must be made after receiving notice from the City. Fertilization: Composition, Packaging, Schedule,Rate of Application. All proposed fertilizers must be approved by City staff prior to purchase or application in the field. All fertilizers roust be of a homogeneous blend, and frust be pre-approved prior to purchase.An open Space Inspector must count all bags prior to application. Fertilizer shall be provided in fifty-pound (510-lb), multi-wall paper bags, polyethylene-lined for moisture resistance, or plastic bags. The fertilizers shall be brought to the site in the original unopened containers bearing the manufacturer's guaranteed analysis. Damaged packages will not be accepted. The Contractor shall furnish the Director of public works or designee with signed legible duplicate copies of all certificates and invoices for all fertilizer to be used. The invoices must state the grade, amount, and quantity received. The Director of Public works or designee on site rust sign both the copy to be retained by the City and the Contractor's copy before any material may be used. The Contractor may not begin the actual fertilizer application until approval by the City has been obtained. Additionally, the Contractor shall submit as pat of his written notice a schedule slowing the site, amount of fertilizer (in number of bags) to be applied in the District, proposed date of application, and the approximate time of application of the fertilizer. Fertilizer type proposed requires prior City approval. The Citi shall be the sole judge of the acceptability of a fertilizer type. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) shall be provided upon submittal of fertilizers for approval. Adequate irrigation will immediately follow the application of fertilizer to force the fertilizer to rest directly on the soil surface. Care shall. be taken to erasure the fertilizer does not become caught in the plant foliage above the soil line. Excessive watering must be avoided to prevent the erosion of fertilizing materials or soil. In perforining periodic operations as re aired herein routine grounds maintenance services at the same work site such as but not limited to Litter control weed control and irri at on shall continue without interni tion. Fertilization. Trees, Shrubs, Groundco ers Fertilization of all trees, shrubs and groundcovers, including plantings on h.ydroseeded barbs 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 136 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 8 within the District, shall be accomplished two (2) times per year by using an approved commercial grade fertilizer. Fertilization s a e applied within the following timeframes: 1. Sept 1 -30 2. April 15-30 Fertilizer with a formulation of 12-4-6 or equivalent shall be applied at one 1) pound of actual. nitrogen per 1,000 square feet of planted arca for shrubs, vines, groundcovers, and trees. Acceptable organic fertilizer would contain a combination of naturally-derived organic components and synthetic organic and inorganic components. The organic portion will be derived from dehydrated poultry manure obtained primarily from layers. Combining the various components creates a mixture of materials that will stimulate microbial activity in the soil in a way that enhances conversion of nutrients into forams usable by plaints. The manure should be heat-treated below the combustion point to remove moisture and dill any pathogens that may be present. Product will be routinely tested for presence of enteric bacteria. Composted organic components will not be acceptable. Acceptable equivalent fertilizer formulations must have the ability to lower soil pH in the short term to facilitate uptake of nutrients by plant materials. Fertilization-. Turf Fertilization of all lawn areas within the designated word area shall be accomplished four (4) times per year with approved commercial grade fertilizers* Fertilizer shall be applied to lawns within the following time frames: 1. September 1-1 2. November 15-30 . June 1-1 Fertilizer shall be applied at one 1) pound of actual nitrogen per 1,000 square feet of planted area. Fertilization must occur in the months listed above and shall be accomplished to achieve an even green appearance. If fertilization results are patchy, remedial fertilizer must be applied immediately at the Contractor's expense. Acceptable fertilizers include; September application = Super Iron 9-9-9; November application — Nitra Kin1 -4-4; March application Iron Advantage 15-4-6; June application= Super Turf 25-5-5; or pre-approved equivalents. Lawn Maintenance Mowing shall, be performed so that no more than orae-third 1/ ) of the grass blade is removed during each mowing in returning the grass to the accepted height for the species of grass being .mowed. Inclement weather may preclude adherence to the frequency schedule. The Contractor may request alteration of this mowing frequency from the Director of Public Works or designee for reasons of rain or prolonged cold. The Contractor shall bag all lawn clippings. The following mowing schedule shall apply to all Code 2 lawn areas listed in the bid portion of time contract document: Mowing ng Frequency & Requirenments March 1 —November 30.- 1 time each weep.; 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 137 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page December 1 —February 28: 1 time every 2 weeks. All turf shall be edged adjacent to all improved surfaces. where no improved surface exists, turf edges shall be maintained if the turf area abuts a shrub bed, property line, or to maintain turf delineation. Dawn areas shall be aerated a minimum of two ( ) times each year and will be scheduled to occur during the following time frames. 1. April 15-30 2. august 15-30 Under adverse conditions or as a result of high use where turf is suffering from compaction, aeration may be necessary at more frequent intervals. Aeration shall be done with a power-driven or tractor-pulled aerator using one-half-inch coring tines. In performinaper odic operations as required herein, routine izrounds maintenance services at the same work site such as, but not limited to., litter control, weed control, and irrigation shall continue without interruption. Low Flow and Brow Channel Maintenance During the months of September and October, the Contractor shall clean all soil and debris from the channels and cut all overhanging plant materials back such that staff can easily walk all ditches for inspection. All plant materials and debris, other than soil and rocks, shall be removed from the job site. During the year, woody plant materials growing in the cracks or edges of the channel shall be removed to prevent damage to the concrete. Also, any loose materials, other than soil, shall be removed during the contract year. Following the rainy season, in late Spring, removal of accumulated sedimentation will be required. In perfon-ning periodic operations as required herein routine grounds maintenance ance services at the same work site such as ut not limited to., litter control weed control and irri ation shall continue without interni tion. Removal of Debris Promptly after pruning, trimming, weeding, edging, and other work required, the Contractor shall remove all debris generated by his/her performance of the word. immediately after working in the areas of public walks, driveways, medians, or paved areas, they shall be thoroughly cleared. If the Contractor's maintenance crews find appliances, furniture, or excessive trash within any open Space area, they shall notify the open Space Inspection staff immediately. All areas shall be kept free of, but not limited to, the following: bottles, cams, paper, cardboard, and metallic items. Removal of common debris, including emptying of waste receptacles, shall be performed on a continual basis with a minimum of once-a-week pick-up.. Areas containing medians, walkways, or asphaltic concrete, stamped or textured concrete, and/or concrete shall be 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 138 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 1 swept as needed to maintain such walkways and areas in a safe and attractive manner. Replacement of Plant Materials The Contractor shall replace any tree, shrub, or groundcover plant which is damaged or last as a result of faulty maintenance at no additional cost to the City.. The Director of Public works or City representative shall be the sole judge of what constitutes "faulty maintenance". Any plant damaged or lost through vandalism shall be replaced at City expense. Costs for replacement of plants and trees lost through vandalism shall be at a mutually negotiated charge. At the City's sale discretion, it may be desirable to replace certain plants during the contract term. The Director of Public works or City representative shall determine the necessity or desirability of such plant replacement. The City will be responsible for the cost of replacing the plants. The Contractor shall be responsible for the maintenance of the replacement plants at no additional cost to the City. Brush Clearance Contractor will be responsible for yearly brush clearance where the open Space District borders private property and when directed by the City's Fire Marshal. A standard clearance of 10 feet from property line will be maintained with a minimum of 30 feet distance from any attached private structure. In areas where the residence may be closer than 20 feet to the property line, additional clearance may be required to establish the 30 feet minimum clearance. The Contractor shall talo notice of potential areas to be cleared during the re-bid inspection as no adjustment i n contract pricing will be allowed after contract ward. Cleared material shall be legally disposed of from the work area. Environmental Fie uladons The Contractor ctor shall abide by all local, state, and federal laws related to environmentally sensitise lands located within the Districts. Large portions of Code 4 and. Code 5 areas are located within Multiple Species Conservation Tari (MSCP) areas and may contain protected or endangered species. Any maintenance activities performed within these areas will be subject to all regulations contained within the MSCP and must be re-approved and closely monitored by City of Chula Vista Environmental Planning staff. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 139 of 768 CITY OF CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 11 OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AREA CODE DESCRIPTIONS CODE AREA IDENTIFICATION DESCRIPTION Areas containing permanent irrigation systems planted in groundcovers, shrubs, and trees. Code I areas shall be kept weed-free M-9m at all times. Plant materials and grasses not consistent with established CODE 1 plantings are considered weeds. Any areas not fully covered with -planted Rro�undcovers are to be replanted by the contractor and gro�wn to fully cover the areas during the normal growing season, at no additional cost to the City. Weeding shall be done as necessary to create a well-balanced appearance. Code 2 areas are lawns with permanent irrigation systems. Weeding 2 shall be done as necessary to create a well-manicured appearance. CODE 2 3 Areas containing permanent irrigation systems and initially planted with hydroseed mix, groundcovers, shrubs, and trees. Code 3 areas shall be kept weed--free as required by the Director of Public Works CODE 3 or designee. Plants (wild flowers and grasses) not consistent with the original hydroseed mix are weeds. The intent is to maintain a healthy vegetation cover for erosion control purposes. Code 4 areas contain temporary or permanent irrigation systems in 4 natural open space lands and slopes with indigenous plant growth. The Contractor shall perform weed abatement in these areas,, as required by the D. irector of Public Works or designee,, to control CODE 4 noxious plant materials such as tumbleweeds, pampas grass, tamarix, and Arundo cane. The Contractor shall maintain trails on a weekly basis to ensure clear, smooth, trash-free travel routes, quarterly grooming to include re-compacting of loose paving materials, and immediate response to needed repairs after rain events. Trail maintenance includes header board and curbing repair. 5 Two times per year, areas of non-,irrigated open. space shall be cleaned of debris including but not limited to the following: bottles, cans, paper, cardboard, or metallic items. Contractor shall remove noxious plant materials such as tumbleweeds, CODE 5 pampas grass, tamarix, and Arundo cane, as directed by the Director of Public Works or designee. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 140 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER BER B26-19/20 Page 1 Deficient Performance The Contractor shall be notified verbally or in writing each time performance is unsatisfactory and corrective action is necessary. The Contractor shall complete corrective action ,within the following time frames subsequent to verbal notification; a. Major irrigation malfunction must be repaired within twelve hours. b. Public Health and Safety issues (Risk Management) shall be corrected immediately upon notification from the Cit Representative. p y p ive. c. Failure to comply with City-defined minimum manpower requirements will result in the immediate deficiency deduction of Tree Hundred Fifty Dollars ($350)per person per day from payments to the Contractor. d. Failure to immediately comply with conditions, specifications, schedules, and directives from Public Works Director or designee will result in a deficiency deduction of Three Hundred Fifty Dollars ($350) per instance from payments to the Contractor, e. Failure to move, edge, trim, hedge, aerate, sweep, pick up trash/debris, perforin brow channel maintenance or trail maintenance, perform brush management, apply chemicals, or prune in an approved, professional manner as specified in this contract or as directedd by the Public Works, Director or designee will result in a Three Hundred Fifty Dollar ($350) per day deduction until all deficiencies are corrected.. f. Failure to comply with water restrictions imposed by Local eater Authorities will, result in a deficiency deduction of Three Hundred. Fifty Dollars ($,350) per occurrence. Additionally, the Contractor shall be responsible for all other penalties imposed by Nater Authorities for infractions due to Contractor neglect.. g. Failure to respond to an emergency call within fifteen (15) minutes during working lours will result in a Three Hundred Fifty Dollar ($350) deficiency deduction per occurrence. Failure to respond to an emergency call within sixty (60) minutes outside of working sours will result in a Three Hundred Fifty Dollar($35o) deficiency deduction per occurrence. h. Failure to comply with the Regional Nater Quality oarrd/ ational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPI restrictions/guidelines imposed by Local water Authorities will result in a deficiency deduction of Three Hundred Fifty Dollars ($350) per occurrence. Additionally, the Contractor shall be responsible for all other penalties imposed by Water Authorities for infractions due to Contractor neglect. i. Failure to submit a.ll, monthly irrigation tracking sheets in a timely manner will 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 141 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 13 result in a deficiency deduction of Three Hundred Fifty Dollars ($350.00) per occurrence per District. Withholding of Payments The City may withhold or permanently retain payments to such extent as may be necessary to protect the City from loss due to: 1. Work required in the specifications, which is defective, incomplete, or not performed. 2. Claims filed against the City for damage caused by the Contractor's acts or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing of claims. 3. Failure of the Contractor to make proper payments to subcontractors or workers for materials or labor. 4. A reasonable doubt that the contract can be completed for the unpaid balance. Failure to Perform Satisfactorily It is agreed and understood that if the Contractor fails to perforin the work as required, the Director of Public Works 1) will pay only for the amount of service received as determined solely by the City, with an appropriate downward adjustment in contract price, or 2) may have such required work done by City crews or otherwise and charge the cost thereof to the Contractor or Contractor's surety agent. discrepancies and deficiencies in t Those scrap e work that remain uncorrected mai result in billing adjustments in the following month. Billing adjustments for this unsatisfactory service shall be permanent retention of 100% of the estimated monthly cost for work that is incomplete or deficient as stated herein. Should failure to perform persist, the City reserves the right to tale action against the performance bond or terminate the contract. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 142 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 14 General Conditions Bidder's Security bid security in an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the bird is required. T bid security may be furnished in the form of cash, cashier's check, certified check, or a bid bond. If the bid security is a bond, It shall be executed by a surety company authorized to transact business In the State of California. The bid security must be included in the sealed envelope with the bid pica osal. Performance Bond Contractor shall furnish the City with a surety bond conditioned upon the faithful performance of q percent (100%) of the amount of contract the contract. The on shall e �n a sum equal to 1 prig. This bond shall be executed by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of California and approved by the City of Chula vista. An endorsed Certificate of Deposit, money order, or certified check may be provided in lieu of an actual bond. Such band or deposit shall be forfeited to the City in the event that the Contractor fails or refuses to fulfill all performance requirements ofthe contract. If the contract is optioned for future years, for the purpose of renewing the contract, the Contractor shall provide a new valid faithful performance bend no later than thirty 30) days prior to the current faithful performance bond expiration date. Failure by the Contractor to provide the new faithful performance bond shall be considered a default by Contractor and may subject the Contractor to a suspension or termination of word under the contract. Payment and Contractor shall furnish the City with a payment bond in a sum equal to 100 percent 100% of the amount of contract prig. The payment bond shall be provided with and in a form similar to the performance bond.. The payment bond shall guarantee that all laborers, material suppliers,, and subcontractors will receive full payment for their services. If the contract is optioned for future years, for the purpose of renewing the contract, the Contractor shall provide a new valid payment bond no later than thirty (30) days prior to the current payment bond expiration date. Failure by the Contractor to provide the new payment bond shall be considered a default by Contractor and may subject the Contractor to a suspension or termination of wort under the contract. Insurance A. Contractor shall, throughout the duration of the contract, maintain comprehensive general liability, property damage, and automobile insurance, or commercial general liability insurance, covering all operations of Contractor, its agents, and employees, performed in connection with the contract, including but not limited to premises and automobiles.. I . Contractor shall maintain the following minimum limits: General Liability Combined Single Limit Per Occurrence 110001000 General :Liability $1 M001000 Property Damage $110001000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 143 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 1 Automobile Liability 1,00OW The City reserves the right to require insurance fora higher coverage than the minimum limits. C. All insurance companies affording coverage to the Contractor shall be required to add the City of Chula Nista as an "additional insured" under the insurance policy for all work performed in accordance with the contract. All insurance companies policies shall be issued by a carrier that has rest's rating of"A; Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval of City's Risk Manager. D. All insurance companies affording coverage shall provide thirty (30), days written notice to the City of Chula Vista should the policy be canceled before the expiration date. For the purposes ofthis notice requirement, any material chane in the policy prier to the expiration. shall be considered a cancellation. E. Evidence of such coverage, in the farm of a Certificate of Insurance and Policy Endorsement, shall be submitted to the Purchasing Division within ten (1.0) days after the award of Contract. This endorsement must be on a separate "Schedule ". Contractor shall provide a substitute certificate of insurance no later than thirty (30) days prior to the policy expiration. date. Failure by the Contractor to provide such a substitution and extend the policy expiration. date shall be considered a default by Contractor and may subject the Contractor to a suspension or termination of work under the contract. Insurance Certificates shall not include "Modified occurrence" restrictions. No substitutions shall be allowed. Worker's Compensation Insurance The Contractor shall carry Worker's Compensation insurance in statutory amount and Employer's Liability coverage in an amount not less than $500,000 and up to $1,000,000 at the City's discretion; evidence of these shall be fumished to the City in the fora. of Certificate of Insurance. Hold Harmless and Indemnification Contractor shall defend, indemnify, protect, and fold harmless the City of Chula Vista, its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against any and all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorney's fees) arising out of the conduct of the Contractor, or any agent or employee, subcontractors, or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by the contract, except only for those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City, its officers, or employees. Contractor's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorney's fees, and liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not. Furthermore, Contractor at its sole expense, shall, upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action: brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees. Contractor's indemnification of City shall not be limited by ,any prior or subsequent declaration by the Contractor. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 144 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 16 Taxes All applicable State or Federal taxes shall be considered as included in the amount paid for services performed. The Contractor shall be responsible for payment of such taxes to the proper governmental authority. Licenses and Permits Contractor and all subcontractors, if any, shall be licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9 of Division III of the Business and Professions Code, Mate of California. Contractor shall procure all licenses and permits required to perform the work described. Contractor shall further pay all charges and fees required to maintain required licenses and permits. The Contractor and subcontractors shall possess a valid Citi of Chula Vista Business License while performing work within City limits. Term The contract term is initialler from. July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021. If contractor's work performance is satisfactory, the parties may mutually agree in writing to extend the contract for four 4 additional one (1) year periods. The annual option year renewals would be effective from July 1. to June 30 the City's Fiscal Year. If the contractor's work performance is not satisfactory, the City reserves the right to not renew the contract without penalty. Prices shall be firm through. June 30, 2021. If the parties agree to extend the contract for the option years, acceptable price increases may be agreed to and such increases would be based on changes in the annual San.Diego Area Consumer Prig Index, in an amount not to exceed 5%. Measurement of Quantities for Unit Price Work The estimate of the quantities of work to be dome and materials to be furnished are approximate only, beim given as a basis for the comparison of bids. The City of Chula Vista does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease by any amount or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or expedient by the City with no adjustment in unit price. The City of Chula Vista reserves the right to use Contractor unit pricing to facilitate Developer turn-overs for landscaped area being added to an.y Com unity Facilities District (CFD) area or adjacent to CFD-maintained areas.. Cooperation Contractor shall work closely with the Director of Public Works or designee to performs wort required to achieve the City's objectives. The Director of Public Works may delegate authority in connection with this agreement to the Open Space .Manager. For the purposes of directing the Contractor's performance, authority is hereby delegated to the open Space Manager. Inspection by City The City will inspect the work area to ensure adequacy of maintenance and that methods of performing the work are in compliance with the contract. Individual Open Space Inspectors may require weekly or periodic walk-through inspections with on-site supervisors as needed to discuss projects, issues, and concerns. Discrepancies and deficiencies in the work shall be corrected by the Contractor immediately upon notification by the City. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 145 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER BER B 6 1'x/20 Page 17 Maintenance services performed by the Contractor shall be performed to the satisfaction of City, Director of Public Works, or designee. Method of Payment; Monthly Reports The Contractor will be paid monthly, in arrears, for work performed satisfactorily. By the Fifth y port of maintenance performed and a o each wont the Contractor shall submit a detailed re materials used, areas and/or units affected, and staff hours expended in the prior month as well as the required monthly irrigation reorts see p irrition section, pages 3 to 5 , irrigation billing, and monthly maintenance bilk The monthly report shall also include a statement of all applications of herbicides, rodenticide, and pesticides detailing the chemical used., quantity, rate of application, area in which used., and the purpose of the application. Upon successful completion of a month' work, payment will be made equal to one twelfth of rice. Billing shall be in accordance with the annus contract i p � iprices submitted an allowing for City approved adjustments, if any. Emergency Calls The Contractor shall have the capability to receive and respond immediately to calls of an. emergency nature during normal working hours and during hours outside of normal working hours. Calls of an emergency nature received by the Director of Public Works shall be referred to the Contractor for immediate disposition. Personnel The Contractor shall furnish sufficient supervisory and working personnel capable of promptly accomplishing on schedule, and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public works, all work required under this contract during the regular and prescribed hours. All such personnel shall be physically able to do their assigned work. The Contractor and his employees shall conduct themselves in a proper, safe, professional, and efficient manner at all times and shall cause the least possible annoyance to the public. They shall be fully clothed in suitable uniform attire with a company identifying marker; personnel fully clothed and wearing a safety vest with the company identification on the back will, be considered suitable uniform attire. The Director of Public works will require the Contractor to remove from the work site any employees deemed careless, incompetent, or otherwise objectionable, whose continued employment on the job is considered to be contrary to the best interest of the City of Chula vista. The Contractor shall have competent supervisors, who may be working supervisors, on the job at all. times work is being performed, who are capable of discussing in English with the Director of Public works or designee matters pertaining, to work required. Supervisors must have a minimum of five (5) years of actual field experience and must be able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Public works or designee that they possess adequate technical background and supervisory shills. Foremen must be able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 146 of 768 CITY OF CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 18 the Director of Public works or designee that they possess adequate technical background. Adequate and competent supervision shall be provided for all work done by the Contractor's employees to ensure accomplishment of high quality work which will be acceptable to the Director of Public works or designee. Additionally, the supervisor shall inspect all areas under the contract a minimum of once per month with the Director of Public Works or designee. The Contractor shall outfit all supervisors with a mobile telephone capable of transmitting and receiving voice and text communication from anywhere. All supervisors must be able to communicate Via email on a dally basis. Independent Contractor Contractor's relationship to the City shall be that of an independent contractor. Contractor shall have no authority, expressed or implied, to act on behalf of the City as an agent, or to bind the City to any obligation whatsoever. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the performance of any of its employees, agents, or subcontractors under any contract marded. Contractor shall report to the City any and all employees, agents, and subcontractors and/or consultants performing work, in connection with this contract, and all shall be subject to prior approval of the City, Prevailing Wages Legislation by the State of California imposes prevailing gage requirements on the work to be perfoi-ned by Contractor during the term of this contract. • Prevailing Nage. The Contractor and its subcontractors are required to pay prevailing wage ("Prevailing Nage sates") to persons employed by them in any contract entered into pursuant to this Notice. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that it is responsible for compliance with all state law requirements governing employment and payment of apprentices, as set forth in:labor Code section 1777.5, and elsewhere, which are fully incorporated. herein by this reference Bonds: City requires Performance and Labor and Material Bonds to be issued by Burets authorized to transact such business in the State of California., be listed as approved by the United States Department of Treasury Circular 570, and who Underwriting Limitation is sufficient to issue bonds in the amount required by any contract entered into pursuant to this Notice.. • Insurance: City requires that throughout the duration of any contract entered into pursuant to this Notice insurance be placed with licensed insurers admitted to transact business in the State of California. Wage Rates far State untied ProjectslCon tracts The contractor and its subcontractors are required by bid specifications to pay prevailing wage ("Prevailing wage Dates ) to persons employed by them for work under this Contract. In 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 147 of 768 CITY of CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER B26-19/20 Page 1 accordance with the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City of Chula Vista has ascertained the general prevailing wage scales applicable to the work to be done. The prevailing wage scales are those determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, State of California. The State prevailing wage rates determination is available directly from the State of California Director of Industrial Relations home page under www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/. Non-Discrimination The City of Chula Vista hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this notice, minority business enterprises will be afforded fill opportunity response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on. o)rtllnit to submit bids res„ the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in consideration for an award. Termination for Cause The following conditions constitute default for which the City may terminate a contract: A. Any material misrepresentation, whether negligent or intentional, by Contractor. B. Contractor's failure to perform any of its material obligations under a contract, including but not limited to 1. Failure to perform any obligations reasonably within. Contractor's control (including but not limited to lacy of sufficient or adequate personnel, equipment, and/or materials); 2. Contractor's failure to promptly perform or correct any of its obligations; . Contractor's unapproved discontinuance of any of its obligations required under a contract; . Contractor's insolvency, filing for bankruptcy, or unapproved assignment for the benefit of creditors or otherwise. Prior to terminating a contract for cause, the City will first notify the Contractor in writing of such failure to meet the obligations of a contract. within ten (10) calendar days of such written notice, Contractor shall have corrected the failure or shall have provided a written cure plan acceptable to the City that outlines its current or planned actions to correct such failure. If the Contractor fails to cure such breach or provide a written cure plan acceptable to the City within the ten 10) days time period, then the City shall have the right to terminate the contract by giving written notice to Contractor specifying the effective date of such termination. "iination. In addition to the remedy set forth above, the City retails the right to pursue any and all other available remedies under law or in equity, including but without limitation, action against the performance bond. Where public interest or necessity demands the immediate termination of the contract to safeguard life, health, or property, the City may terminate the contract immediately without prior notice of deficiencies, and no opportunity to cure failures will be provided. 'Termination for Convenience City may terminate the contract at any time, and for any reason, by giving specific written notice to the Contractor of such ten-nination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 148 of 768 CITY OF CHULA VISTA BID NUMBER BER B26 1'x/20 Page 20 days prior to the effective date of such termination. If the contract is terminated by Casty as provided in this paragraph, Contractor shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed. Contractor expressly agrees that no farther penalties, remedies, or consideration would be forthcoming in the event of termination for convenience. Interpretation of Agreement The interpretation, validity and enforcement of any contract awarded shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. The Contractor shall be responsible for complying with any Local, State, and Federal laws whether or not said laws are expressly stated or referred to herein. Should any provision herein be found or deemed to be invalid, the contract shall be construed as not containing such provision, and all other provisions that are otherwise lawful shall remain in. frill force and effect, and to this end the provisions of the contract are severable. Administrative Claims Requirement and Procedure To suit shall be brought against the City arising out of a contract awarded, unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City of Cupon by the City Chula Vista an ante of Chula Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same. Conflict Resolution Upon request by the City, Contractor shall meet and confer in good faith with the City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over contract terms and conditions. 2020-06-23 Agenda racket, Page 149 of 768 zmr, ..' l IN III til v r :a C1TY' C,0UNC'1LSTIA, ""EMENT CITY, OF CHUIAVISTA r l 1 June 23,2020 File ID: 20-0241 „MITI RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFCHULAVISTA AMENDING"THE FISCALYEAR 2ol1 ,/20 OTHER GRANTS, FUND, BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $3,000 TO THE ANIMAL CARE FACILITY GRANT FOR UNANTICIPATED GRANTS 4,/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED171 Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY The Animal Care Facility has received unanticipated revenue in the amount of$3,000 from grants that needs to be appropriated in the FY201 :budget. Staff requests that $3,000 be appropriated to the Supplies and Services budget of the other Grants Fund for the Animal Care Facility Grant budget; this appropriation is fully offset by grant revenue. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality t Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.. , I 'S10N/COMMffRECOMMENDA'TION Not Applicable DISCUSSION The Chula Vista Animal Care Facility received two grants in the amount of$3,0100 to help with foster supplies during the COVID,-19 response.'The funds help us purchase Supplies to support our animal foster program. The foster program normally louses neonate kittens,but during limited staffing we were able to expand the program to include dogs,adult cats,rabbits,and guinea.pigs. These grants were received in June, 20201,and will be expended in FY21.The funds will be appropriated and rolled over to the neer FY for expenditure. DECISION-MAKER " Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and:has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently,the 5001-foot rule found in California Code of'Regulations Title 2,section 18702.2(a)(11),is not 1 . 0 0 1 P IiI 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1.50 of 768 applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal. Gov't Code§87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware and has not been informed by any City Council member�, of any other fact that may constitute,a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There is no net fiscal impact to the General Fund. Approval of the resolution will result in a General Fund appropriation of$3,000 offset by unanticipated grants. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing fiscal impact. Al"TACHMENTS None Staff Contact:Amanda Mills,Animal Care Administrator P 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 151 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 OTHER GRANTS FUND BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $300 TO THE ANIMAL CARE FACILITY GRANT FOR UNANTICIPATED GRANTS WHEREAS, in 2020 the Chula Vista Animal Care Facility applied for two grants related to the COVIN-1 response and was awarded grants from Maddie's Fund and PetFinder; and WHEREAS, the Animal Care Facility will use these funds to purchase supplies for the Animal Care Facility's Foster Program-, and WI-Ii EREASI the Animal Care Facility will be able to increase the amount of animals in foster care. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, approves an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Other Grants Fund Budget by appropriating $,3,000 to the Supplies and Services expense category to be offset by grant funding. Presented by Approved as, to form by Maria Kachadoorian Glen R. Googins City Manager City Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 152 of 768 zmr, ..' l v r r IN III til C1TY' C,0UNC'1L A,GEN' DA S,TIA, "nEMENT l 1 CITY, OF CHUIAVISTA June 23,2020 File ID: 20-01245 ,TITS RESOLUTION OF'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CH LAVISH"AAUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE,OF CORONAVIRUS AIH RELIEF,AND ECONOMIC SECURITY (CARES) ACT CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND (CRF) ALLOCATION of $4,842,695 FROM T _ E COUNTY of SAN DIEGO AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE GENERAL FUND IN FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 AND FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) ACTIONRECOMMENDED ° Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On May 19, 2020,the County of San Diego :board of Supervisors voted to allocate a portion of CARES Act CRF funds to 17 cities that did not receive a direct allocation from the federal government. The City of'Chula Vista's allocation totals $4,842,695 and must comply with CARES Act. CRF grant requirements, which mandate that all expenditures are directly related to the public health emergency caused by COVID-19. Eligible categories of expenditures include Law Enforcement for COVID- 9, Economic Development Initiatives, Telework Enhan.cement/°Infrastrlucture, Sanitation Compliance, and/or Facility Enhancements for Social Distancing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section. 1.50 o1(c)(3) no environmental ental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION Prior to acceptance of these funds, the city must submit a plan that illustrates hover vire intend to spend the allocated funds. There is no grant snatching requirements and funds must be expended by September 30, 2020. Funds may only be used for costs that were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020 and were incurred between. March 1., 2020 and September 30, 2020. The County has stated that all CARES Act CRS"funds received by the City must be returned to the County of San Diego in the event that the City receives any future federal stimulus funds. 1 . 0 0 1 P Ii1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1.53 of 768 All expenditures are intended to be consistent with the CARES ACT and the City of Chula Vista recognizes the direction provided by the County of San Diego to include: 1. Prior to distribution,the City of Chula Vista must submit a plan that illustrates how the City will spend the allocation before the funds are released.The City must also submit a mid-term plan no later than July 31, 2020 providing a status of expenses., 2. After the City has received the funds, the City must submit documentation to support all expenditures. All funds must be expended or returned to the County and all documents must be submitted prior to September 30, 2020. 3,. The City will be financially responsible for any disallowed costs. If the City receives future federal stimulus funds (non-CARES Act funding), all fund allocated to the City by the County shall be returned. Attachment A includes a proposed grant fund allocation plan for the expenditures of CARES Act CRF funds. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT" Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently,the Soo-foot rule found in California Code of'Regulations Title 2,section 187'02.2(a)(11),is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal. Gov't Code§87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURREN"I'-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The Finance Department will establish the grant revenue and expenditure accounts upon receipt of funds from the County of San Diego. used on the allocation plan attached to, this item, we are anticipating a reimbursement to the General Fund of$1.2 million in the current fiscal year. This will assist in offsetting some of the anticipated impacts due to the COVID-19 crisis. ONGOING FISCAL IMPAC 10,111 There is approximately$3.6 million in anticipated allocations for fiscal year 2021. There is no ongoing fiscal impact related to this allocation as no matching funds are require. ATTACHMENTS A- CARES Act CRF Grant Letter from the County of San Diego B-County of San Diego Coronavirus Relief Fund Subgrant C - City of Chula Vista CARES Allocation Plan Staff Contact:David'Bil'by,Director of Finance P2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 154 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF C HU A VIS"T"A AUTHORIZING IZING Thi ACCEPTANCE OF A CARES ACCT CORONAVIRUS US R LIEF FUND GRANT ALLOCATION OF $4,842,695 FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO .ANIS APPROPRIATING FUNIS IN THE GENERAL FUND IN FISCAL AL YEAR 019120 AND IN FISCAL YEAR 20 O/21 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) WHEREAS, on May 19, 2020, the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors voted to allocate a portion of Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act Corona Virus Relief("CRF") funds to 17 cities that did not receive a direct allocation from the federal government; and WHEREAS,S, the City of Chula Vista's allocation totals $4,842,695 and the City's use of these funds must comply with CARES Act CRF grant requirements, which mandate that all expenditures be directly related to the public health emergency caused by COVID-1.9; and WHEREAS, eligible categories of COVIC-1.9 expenditures include: certain Lave Enforcement activities, Economic Development Initiatives, Telework Enhancement/Infrastructure, Sanitation Compliance, and Facility enhancements for Social. Distancing; and HEREAS, prior to acceptance of these funds, the City of Chula Nista must submit a plan that illustrates how the City intends to spend the allocated funds.- and WHEREAS, finds may only be used for costs that were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020 and are incurred between March 1, 2020 and September 30, 2020 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it. (i) authorizes the acceptance of a CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) Grant allocation of$4,842,695 from the County of SanDiego; (ii) authorizes and directs the City Manager to submit the City of Chula Vista. CARES Allocation Ilan and complete all documents required to obtain the grant; and. (iii) authorizes the appropriations in the General. Fund in fiscal. year 19/20 and fiscal year 20/21. Presented by approved as to fora.by MAFIA IACD IADOO IAT GLEN R. GOOGINS City.Manager City Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 1.55 of 768 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 156 of 768 v �n r ec Tountv of ,*au x1tegla TRACY M.SANDOVAL FINANCE&GENERAL GOVERNMENT GROUP DEPUTY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 1 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY,SUITE 166,SAN DIEGO,CA 92141-2422 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (619]531-5413 FAX,(619)5315219 May 20,2020 Mr. Gary Halbert City Manager City of Chula Vista 275 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Gary, Thank you for your partnership and leadership during this COVID-19 pandemic.The regional collaboration has been critical to keeping our community safe and healthy,and we greatly appreciate the efforts you have taken to support this effort. To that end,on May 19,2020(Items#14128)the County Board of Supervisors voted to allocate a total of$25 million of Coronavirus Aid, Relief,and Economic Security(CARES)Act Coronavirus Relief Fund(CRF)to the 17 cities that did not receive a direct allocation from the federal government. Attached to this letter is a sub-grant agreement to be completed by your City in order to receive the funds. The funds have been determined based on population as directed by the Board of Supervisors. Your allocation is$4,842,595. In addition, expenditures must comply with the CARES Act CRF criteria,which require,among other things,that the expenditures be necessary due to the public health emergency with respect to COVID-19. These may include Law Enforcement for COVID- 19, Economic Support initiatives,Telework Enhancements/infrastructure,Sanitation Compliance,or Facility Enhancements for Social Distancing. These funds may not be used to backfill lost revenues. Process for Distribution of Funds: o Prior to distribution,the City must submit a plan that illustrates how you will spend the allocation before the funds are released; and also submit a mid-term plan, no later than July 31,2020,on the status of spending. o Once the City has received the funds,the City must submit documentation to support all expenditures. All funds shall be expended or returned to the County,as well as all documentation submitted,by September 30,2020. o City will be financially responsible for any disallowed costs. Should the City receive future federal stimulus funds(non-CARES Act funding),all funds allocated to the City by the County shall be returned. Thank you again for your partnership and commitment during these unprecedented times. All documentation and questions can be submitted to Ebony Shelton at Ebony.Shelton@sdcountv-ca.gov. Sincerely, TRACY M.SANDOVAL Deputy Chief Administrative Officer/Chief Financial Officer CS:Id Attachment ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE GRAND JURY AUDITOR&CONTROLLER COUNTY COUNSEL HUMAN RESOURCES CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE COUNTY TECHNOLOGY OFFICE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS 2021 91!2,:W�VJQF;IIZQWISSION DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES RETIREMENT ASSd3aAfoWf 76 CLERK OF THE BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PURCHASING&CONTRACTING TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND SUBGRANT This sub rant agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between the County of San Diego, a political subdivision of the State of Califomia ("County") and City of Chula Vista, ("Grantee") effective as of May 19, 2020. WHEREAS, the County has, received an allocation from the Coronavirus Relief Fund ("CRF") established under Title V,, Section 5001 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act; WHEREAS, CRF funding may only be used to cover costs, that: (1) are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2 19 (COVIN-19); (2) were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020; and (3) were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 202O, and ends on December 30, 2020; such costs to be referred to herein as "Eligible Expenditures;" WHEREAS, the County may allocate CRF funding to cities as long as cities spend the funding in accordance with the CARES Act and only for Eligible Expenditures, WHEREAS, the County finds, it necessary to provide financial assistance to cities within the County's geographical boundaries due tothe public health emergency with respect to COVID- 19 and that such assistance is, an eligible expense under the CARES Act; WHEREAS, on May 1.9, 2020, the Board of Supervisors, allocated funding for the purposes set forth in this Agreement and authorized the execution of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the County and Grantee agree as follows: 1. Amount of Grant. The County shall pay to Grantee an amount of$,4,842,695 in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 2. Purpose of Grant. Grantee shall use the funds solely for Eligible Expenses and in accordance with the terms set forth inthis Agreement. 3. Deadline for Use of Grant Funds. Grantee shall have until September 30, 2020 to expend funds under this Agreement and/or return any unexpended funds to County. 4. Reports, and Documentation of Expenditures. (a) Prior to County's, disbursement of funds under this Agreement, Grantee shall deliver to County a report detailing Grantee's anticipated use of the funds. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 158 of 768 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND SUBGRANT (b) On July 311 2020, Grantee shall deliver to County a report detailing Grantee's expenditure of funds to date and Grantee's anticipated use of any remaining funds. (c) County reserves the right to withhold or reduce funding under this Agreement if County determines, in its sole discretion, that any or all of Grantee's anticipated use of funds is ineligible for CRF funding. (d) On September 30, 2020, or on the effective date of termination oft is Agreement if terminated earlier,, Grantee shall deliver to County a report along with supporting documentation detailing Grantee's expenditure of funds to date and Grantee shall deliver to County all unexpended funds. 5. Disallowance. If County determines that any amount of Grantee's expenditures, under this Agreement lacks the required documentation or is ineligible for CRF funding, Grantee shall refund such amount to the County within fifteen (1.5 days of County's written request. 1 6. Subsequent Funding. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, if Grantee is awarded direct federal funding to address VID- re.ate impacts, Grantee shall refund to County within ten (10) days of Grantee's receipt of such federal funding the lesser of(a) the funds paid to Grantee under this Agreement and(b)the federal funds awarded to Grantee. 7. Compliance with Laws. Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, including, without limitation, requirements regarding the use grant funds under the CARES Act that are in effect as of the effective date of this Agreement and that may later be enacted or promulgated. Without limiting the foregoing, Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal requirements set forth in Exhibit A, Federal Requirements, attached hereto. 8. Agreement Administration. The individuals listed below shall administer this Agreement on behalf of the County and Grantee. All communications between Grantee and the Counters a be sent to the individuals listed below. County of San Diego City of Chula Vista Ebony Shelton Maria Kachadoorian Director, Office of Financial Planning City Manager 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 352, San 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA Diego, CA 92101 91910 (619) 531-5177 (619) 691-5031 ebony.sheltonL&sdcounty.ca.gov mkachadoorianL&ci.chula-vista.ca.us cit,vman,agerL&chulavistaca.=g.ov 9. Audit and Ins action of Records. At any time during normal business hours, the Grantee shall make available to the County for examination all of its records,with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement and will permit the County to audit,, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and make audits of all invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. Unless 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 159 of 768 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND SUBGRANT otherwise specified by the County, said records shall, be made available for examination. within San Diego County. Grantee shall maintain such records in an accessible location and condition for a period of not less than, four years followin.g grantee's submission of the final. report required to be submitted under this Agreement unless County agrees in Writing to an earlier disposition. The State of California and any federal agency having an interest in the subject of this Agreements all have the same rights conferred. upon Counter by this Agreement. 10. Termination of Agreement. (a) Termination for Convenience. The County may, by written notice to grantee stating the extent and effective date, terminate this Agreement for convenience in whole or in part at any time. Within five (5) days of such termination, Grantee shall return to County any unexpended funds paid to It under this Agreement. (b) Termination for Default. If Grantee fails to perform its obligations under this Agreement,the County may send Grantee a written notice of default that specifies the nature of the default. Grantee shall cure the default within five (5) business days following receipt oft e notice of default, or within such additional time to which County may agree. If Grantee fails to cure the default within that time, the Counter may terminate this Agreement by giving Grantee written notice of immediate termination. The County may also seek. any and all legal and equitable remedies against grantee for breaching this Agreement. 1.1. Independent Capacity. In the performance of this Agreement,Grantee and its officers,agents, employees and volunteers shall act in an independent capacitor and not as officers, employees, agents or volunteers of the County. This Agreement does not create an employment relationship between grantee and the County. 12. Defense and Indemnitor. To the fullest extent permitted by law, County shall not be liable for, and Grantee shall defend and indemnify County and its officers, agents, employees and. volunteers (collectively, "County parties") against any and all claims, deductibles, self- insured retention's, demands, liability, judgments, avwa:rds, fines, mechanics' liens or other liens, labor disputes, losses, damages, expenses, charges or costs of any find or character, including attorneys' fees and court costs (collectively, "Claims"),which arise out of or are in any way connected to County's provision of grant funds and/or grantee's use of grant funds under this Agreement arising either directly or indirectly from any act, error, omission or negligence of Grantee or its officers, employees, volunteers, agents, contractors, licensees or servants, including without limitation, Claims caused by the sole passive negligent act or the concurrent negligent act, error or omission, whether active or passive, y� parties. assive o County Grantee shall have no obligation, however, to defend or indemnify County parties from. a 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 160 of 768 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND SUBGRANT Claire if it is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that such Claim was caused by the sole active negligent act or willful misconduct of County Parties. For avoidance of doubt, and without limitation, the defense and indemnity obligations set forth in this Paragraph 12 shall specifically apply to any actions against the County by a federal agency to disallow funds or otherwise enforce compliance under the CAFES Act or other federal requirements. 13. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the State of California. 1 . Assl nment. Grantee may not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement (whether by assignment or novation), without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Grantee and County regarding the subject matter contained herein. All other representations,, oral or written, are superseded by this Agreement. Neither party is relying on any representation outside of this Agreement. This Agreement may be changed only by written amendment signed by County and grantee. 16.. Waiver. The failure of one party to enforce any term.,covenant or condition of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of that party's right to subsequently enforce this, or any other terra, covenant or condition of this Agreement. No waiver shall be deemed effective unless the waiver is expressly stated in writing and signed by the party waiving the right or benefit. 17. Survival. Unless,otherwise specified herein, all terms and conditions of this Agreement shall. survive the expiration oft is Agreement. 18. Remedies. The rights and remedies 1n this Agreement are In addition to, and not a limitation. on, all other rights and remedies available at law or in equity, and exercise of one right or remedy shall not be deemed a waiver of any other right or remedy. 19. Recoi4nition. If Grantee chooses to give written recognition of this grant Grantee shall. recognize the County of San Diego and not one or more individual County Supervisors. 20. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, and each counterpart shall. constitute one agreement binding on all parties hereto, notwithstanding that all of the parties are not signatory to an original or same counterpart. The parties agree that signatures transmitted electronically via pdf attachment shall be binding as if they were original signatures. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Agreement effective on the date first written above. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 161 of 768 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND SUBGRANT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF CHULA.VISTA. By: y: Ebony Shelton, Director, Office of Financial Maria Kachadoorian, City of Chula Vista Planning Date: Date; Approved as to form and legality County Counsel y: Shiri. Hoffman, Senior Deputy 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 162 of 768 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND SUBGRANT EXHIBIT A—FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS Grantee shall comply with all applicable requirements associated with the CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund. grantee shall also comply with all applicable requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST P:RINCI:PL ► , AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS, including, without limitation, the following. 1. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION. (a) This Agreement is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R.pt. 180 and 2 C.F.R.. pt. 3000. As such, Grantee is required to verify that none of their principals (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.995) or affiliates (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.940) or disqualified(defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.935). (b) Gmust comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C. and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction they eater into. (c) This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by County. If it is later determined that Grantee did not comply with 2C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to County, the federal government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension. and/or debarment. 2. SINGLE AU IT. Grantee shall comply with the Single Audit requirements of 2 CFR Fart 200.5 01, et seq. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW, REGULATIONS, ANIS EXECUTIVE ORDERS. This is an acknowledgement that federal funding under the CARES Act is used to fund this Agreement. Grantee will comply with all applicable federal lay., regulations, executive orders, policies, procedures, and directives. 4. NO OBLIGATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. The federal government is not a party to this,Agreement and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the County or Grantee, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the Agreement. 5. PROGRAM FRAUD ANIS FALSE OR FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS OR RELATED ACTS. Grantee acknowledges that 31 U.S.C. Chap. 3 (Administrative Remedies, for False Claims and Statements) applies to Grantee's actions pertaining to this Agreement. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 163 of 768 Attachment C City of Chula Vista CARES Allocation Plan-County of San Diego CARES Act CRF Funding Program or Activity Total CARES Allocation 1 City Staff supporting County of San Diego 211 Operations,Food Distribution Sites,Westside COVID Task Force,Cool Zones and Police and Fire services $ 1,486,421 City staff redirected to support the County of San Diego 211 Operations,and Food Distribution due to COVID-19. Also includes staff in Police,Fire,Public Works and Code Enforcement working on the Westside COVID-Task Force. Due to the closure of Libraries and Recreation Centers,staff will operate alternative Cool Zone sites which meet the social distancing and sanitation requirements. This category also includes Police and Fire services irealted to COVID-19 education and enforcement services. 2 City Park staff time,contractors and eqluipment needed to perform extra cleaning&disinfecting of restrooms&monitoring social distancing at City Parks due to COVID-19 crisis. $ 220,000 Cleaning of City restrooms increased to twice a day due,to COVID-19 crisis during the summer months.Aliso,Park staff time spent on monitoring social distancing and safe sport interactions in City parks. 3 Economic Development staff time redirected to develop and implement the Economiimc Recovery Plan $ 70,916 City staff costs incurred in developing and implementing the Economic Recovery Plan as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. 4 Transitioning Emp'lloyee's to new operating model and onboarding technology due to COVID,-19 Crisis $ 179,702 Human Resources staff time costs related to transitioning employees to telecommuniting which included creating new policies as well as,tracking new Federal and State employee guidelines. Also, includes training employees on creating a safe COVID working environment and purchasing onboarding technology needed to recruit under new operating conditions, 5 PPE,Sanitation Supplies and Sanitation Eqluipment for City Facilities $ 335,808 Cleaning supplies,and equipment to assist in the sanitization of our public facilities. 6 Facility Enhancements for Social Distancing and Sanitation Compliance $ 200,000 Modifications to public facilities to improve social distancing and sanitation compliance. 7 COVID,Crisis Communications Team $ 100,000 COVID Crisis Communications Team disseminated information to residents,and businesses,on health orders and resources to prevent the spread of COVID-19 within the community. 8 Computer and Equipment Expenditures for Employee Telecommuting $ 329,848 Purchase of computers and office equipment needed by City Staff in order to facilitate telecommuting 9 Economic Development Recovery Grants to Small Businesses $ 1500,000 Funding of small business grant program to provide economic relief and assist at risk businesses rebounding from the economic impacts of COVID-19. 10 Childl Care Services $ 220,000 Child Care services for low-income families impacted by COVID-19. 11 IHorneless Prevention and Rental Assistance Program $ 200,000 Rental assistance to low-income families impacted by the economic crisis and rental suppo'rt due to the eviction moratorium due to COVID-19 crisis. $ 4,842,695 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 164 of 768 zmr, ..' l IN III til v r :a C1TY' C,0UNC'1LSTIA, ""EMENT CITY, OF CHUIAVISTA r l 1 June 23, 2020 File IIS: 20-0250 TITS RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHOLA VISTA APPROVING THE COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR ALL UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES ANIS ELECTED OFFICIALS, INCLUDING AU'THORIZA'TION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY CONTRACT AMENDMENTS TO IMPLEMENT SAID COMPENSATION SUMMARY RECOMMENDEDT Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY The current Compensation Summary for all unrepresented employees and elected officials expires on Jeune 30, 20201. Staff is requesting approval of the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Compensation Summary for unrepresented employees. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of'De elopment Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section. 15378 of the State CEQ.A. Guidelines; therefore,. pursuant to Section 150o(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines,the activity is not subject to CEQ.A. Thus,no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION None. DISCUSSION The current Compensation Summary for all unrepresented employees and elected officials expires on June o, 2020. Staff is requesting approval of the Fiscal Year 20201-2021 Compensatior Summary. Approval of the resolution would approve the Compensation Summary for Executive Management, Senior Management,rent, Unclassified Middle Management/Professional, Confidential Middle Mar age nent/"Professional, Unclassified Confidential, Confidential Classified, Mayor, Council, City.Attorney and Unclassified Dourly Employees for Fiscal Year 2020-2021. 1 . 0 0 1 P Ii1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 165 of 768 DECISION-MAKER C"ONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section. 18704.2(a)(1), is not applicable to this decision. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. ONGOING FISCAL IMPAC'I" There is anticipated salary savings projected in the department to absorb the fiscal impact associated with this item, resulting in no net impact to the General Fund. Al"TACHMENT Compensation Summary for Executive Management, Senior Management, Unclassified Middle Management/Professional, Confidential Middle Management/Professional, Unclassified Confidential, Confidential Classified, Mayor, Council, City Attorney and Unclassified Hourly Employees for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Staff Contact.-Courtney Chase, Director of Human ResourceslRisk Management P 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 166 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL of TIME CITY of CI-ULA VISTA APPROVING THE COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR. ALL UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES AND ELECTED OFFICIALS, INCLUDING AUTHORIZATION FOR TIME MAYOR. To EXECUTE UTE ANY NECESSARY SAR.Y C ONTRACT AMENDMENTS ENT TO IMPLEMENT SAIF COMPENSATION SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City has set forth the compensation for all unrepresented employees and elected officials as set forth in a Compensation Summary via prior resolution; and WHEREAS, the City desires to adopt the Compensation Summary for all unrepresented employees and elected officials ("Compensation Summary"') to inter alfa, attached to the related staff report as Attachment 1, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby does approve the Compensation Summary, including authorization for the Mayor to execute any necessary contract amendments to implement said Compensation Summary, and it shall continue in full force and effect until subsequent amendment by City Council. Presented by Approved as to form b Courtney Chase Glen R. Googins Director of Human Resources/Risk Management City.Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 167 of 768 COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SENIOR MANAGEMENT, UNCLASSIFIED MIDDLE MANAGEMENTIPROFESSIONAL, CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE IVIS►NAt EMENTIPROFFSS1oNAL, UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL, CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFIED, MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY ATTORNEY AND UNCLASSIFIED HOURLY EMPLOYEES FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 I. EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP (ALL EMPLOYEES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS GROUP ARE FL A-EXEM T) A. SALARY & MAGES 1. Salary Increases — None B. BENEFITS 1. Deferred Compensation Plan 457 plan - Employees in the Executive Group may participate in the city's approved deferred compensation plans. 2. cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 20201,1 Executive Managers will receive 17,390 annually to be used for the purchase of approved employee benefits through the city's cafeteria plan or to be placed in a taxable cash option. The maximum taxable option shall be $8,1000. b. In the event of' increases in health care planpremiums,,, the city will split the cost of the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan benefit allotment will be increased by one-Dalt of the average cost increase for full family non-indemnity health plan premiums. The city's share of the increased cost will be added to the begi nn ng cafeteria plan balance oft e next available cafeteria plan year. c. From the annual cafeteria Flan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the city sponsoredplans,,, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse's plan in which case they may waive coverage so longi as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the city. When waiving coverage, the full value oft e cafeteria Flan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the cafeteria Plan. 'Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the city is notified within 30 days that the employee Inas involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee only, those with coverage outside of the city, and those employees covered by another city Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($15,,162). The flex amount for Page 1 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 168 of 768 Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. 3. Short/Long Term C3 lability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for Executive Managers. 4. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 5. Post Employment Health Plan �Employees in the Executive Group may participate in a Post Employment Health Plan (PEHP), funded with mandatory eligible employee contributions, specifically any unused vacation balances due to the employee at the time of retirement will be rolled over into the FEF. Those employees not wishing to participate may sell back up to 1001% of vacation (annual) balances the last full pay period of employment prior to retirement. 6. Life Insurance City pays for a Group Term Life and AD&D, insurance policy with coverage inthe amount of$50,000 per employee. 7. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Effective 04/22/2011 Effective 01/011/20,13 Page 2 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 169 of 768 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% � 60 and Local Safety 3% Pension Contributions: RE FSA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for Local Safety, but will also contribute the following amounts to the employer's side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to rear the cal ERS standard of equal s aringi of normal costs. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amount necessary to the employer's side (GC 20,516) so that equal sharing of normal costs is reached. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute an additional 3.5% to the Employer's share for FY 20-21. This contribution shall increase 01.5% each year until 50% equal sharing of normal costs is reached. The following is a summary of'Tier 1 cal ERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% (&_ 60 and Local Safety 3% Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To meet that standard,I Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7%for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for Local Safety, but will also contribute to the employer's side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the cal ERS standard of equal sharingi of normal costs. Accordingly,I Tier 2 employees all make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amount necessary to the employer's side (GC 20,516) so that equal sharing normal costs until of' normal cost is reached. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute an additional 3.5% to the Employer's share for FY 20-21. This contribution shall increase 01.5% each year until 50% equal sharing of normal costs is reached. Page 3 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 170 of 768 The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 and Local Safety 2.7% Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied to the Cal ERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PEPRA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard,I Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer's side (GC 20516) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013, the followings is a summary of Tier 3 benefits-. A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit 8. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of' an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of Cal RERS that a non-safety employee is disabled, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balances may be applied to applicable CalPERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated,, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers Compensation laws, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. Page 4 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 171 of 768 9. Sick Leave Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules. 10.AnnualLeave a. Executive Managers shall earn five weeks (25 days) annual leave per fiscal year accrued at 7.69 hours per pay period. An employee may not accumulate more than three times the number of annual leave days accrued annually. b. Executive Managers will have the option of sell ngi ack three (3) weeks accrued annual leave each fiscal year. Additional sell back may be allowed at the discretion of'the City Manager. 11.Holidays a. Executive Managers will be credited 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays,,, and Admission Day). b. Executive Managers shall also be allotted eight (8) additional hours of floating holiday per year for Fiscal Year 2020-2021. The eight (8) hours may be taken in the same manner as vacation leave. The eight (8) hours must be used in its respective fiscal year, may not be carried over to the next fiscal year, and may not be cashed out. c. The City will be closed on the followings hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Clay,1 Veterans Clay,1 Thanksgiving,1 the day after Thanksgiving,, Christmas,,l New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 1 2.Administrative Leave Executive Managers will receive ninety-six (96) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 13.Mileage Reimbursement Employees in this unit shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate, in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 14.Severance Pay In the event an Executive Manager is terminated without cause, he or she all receive compensation in a lump sum cash payment equal to nine (9) months of his or her annual salary and health insurance payments. The aforementioned severance pay shall not be reduced during the term of their employment. Notwithstand ngi the aforementioned severance terms, if an Executive Manager has an employment contract their severance payment shall be as set forth in their employment contract/offer letter. 15.S ec al Assignment Pay Executive Managers may receive up to 10% additional compensation when assigned by the City Manager to a special project. Page 5 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 172 of 768 16.Educational and Uniform Allowances The Chief'of' Police and Fire Chief will be provided with the uniformallowance and educational differentials as specified in the POA and IAFF MOUS respectively. In addition, the Chief of Police will be provided $1,20101 per month for a POST Management Certificate or higher. This educational differential is not cumulative with the educational differential specified in the POA MOU. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) Page 6 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 173 of 768 II. SENIOR MANAGEMENT GROUP (ALL EMPLOYEES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS GROUP ARE FLSA-EXEMPT) A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases — None B. BENEFITS 1. Deferred Compensation Plan 457 Plan - Employees in the Senior Management Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 2. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 20120,, Senior Managers will receive $15,9901 annually to be used for the purchase of' approved employee benefits or to be placed in a taxable cash option. The maximum taxable option shall be $7,,0100. b. In the event of increases in health care plan premiums,1 the City will split the cost of' the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan allotment will be increased by one-half of the average cost increase for full family non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the beginning cafeteria plan balance of the next available cafeteria plan year. c. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans,, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse's plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of'the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($13,1762). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. 3. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for Senior Managers. 4. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1,1 2011. Page '7 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 174 of 768 5. Post Employment Health Plan Employees in the Senior Management Group may participate in a Post Employment Health Plan (PEHP), funded with mandatory eligible employee contributions, specifically any unused vacation balances due to the employee at the time of retirement will be rolled over into the FSE P. Those employees not wishing to participate may sell back up to 100% of vacation (annual) balances the last full pay period of employment prior to retirement. 6. Life Insurance City pays for a Group Term Life and AID&A insurance policy with coverage in the amount of$50,00101 per employee. 7. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIFERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Effective 04/22/2011 **Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% (&, 60 and Local Safety 3% Pension Contributions: RE RA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for Local Safety, but will also contribute the following amounts to the employer's side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reacthe Cal ERS standard of equal s aringi of normal costs. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amount necessary to the employer's side (GC 20,516) so that equal sharing of normal costs is reached. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute an additional 3.5% to the Employer's share for FY 20-21. This contribution shall increase 01.5% each year until 50% equal sharing of normal costs is reached. Page 8 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 175 of 768 The following is a summary of Tier 1 Cal ERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% (&, 60 and Local Safety 3% Pension Contributions: RE RA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To meet that standard,,l Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution, (grit no EPMC) of 7% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for Local Safety, but will also contribute to the employer's side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the Cal ERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amount necessary to the employer)s side (CSC 20516) so that equal sharing normal costs until of normal cost is reached. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute an additional 3.5% to the Employer's share for FY 20-21. This contribution shall increase o.5% each year until 50% equal sharing of normal costs is reached. The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit Page 9 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 176 of 768 Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% � 62 and Local Safety 2.7% Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied tothe Cal ERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PE FSA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard,,, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer's side (GC 20516) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public �Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of L v ngi Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit 8. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of PERS that a non-safety employee is disabled,,, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balance may be applied to applicable PERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated,,, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers Compensation laws,, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 9. Sick Leave Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules. 10.Annual Leave a. Senior Managers shall earn a minimum of three weeks (15 days) annual leave per year duringi the first through ninth year of continuous service, four weeks (20 days) annual leave after completion of tenth through fourteenth year of continuous service,,, and five weeks (25 days) annual leave for fifteen or more years of continuous service. An employee may not accumulate more than three times the number of'annual leave days accrued annually. b. Senior Managers have the option of sell ngi back three (3) weeks of accrued annual leave each fiscal year. Page 10 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 177 of 768 11.Holidays a. Senior Managers will be credited 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays, and Admission Day). b. Senior Managers shall also be allotted eight (8) additional hours of floating holiday per year for Fiscal Year 2020-2021. The eight (8) hours may be taken in the same manner as vacation leave. The eight (8) hours must be used in its respective fiscal year, may not be carried over to the next fiscal year, and may not be cashed out. c. The City will be closed on the following hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Than ksgiivingi, day after Than ksgiving„ Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King dr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 12.Mileage Reimbursement Employees in this unit shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate, in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 13.Administrative Leave Senior Managers will receive (ninety-six) (96) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 14.S ec al Assignment Pay Senior Managers may receive up to 10% additional compensation when assigned by the City Manager to a special project. 15.Uniform Allowances and Educational Differentials Sworn public safety Senior Managers will be provided with the uniform allowance and educational differentials as specified in the applicable public safety MOU. 16.Professional Enrichment Senior Managers are eligible to participate in the City's Professional Enrichment Program. The annual Professional Enrichment allocation for Senior Managers of $25,01010, is for exclusive use by members of the Senior Management group for conferences and training. An employee is eligiible to receive up to$2,500 per fiscal year for professional enrichment. Funds may be used at any time during the fiscal year. Fiscal year reimbursements under the City's "Professional Enrichment" will be closed the second Thursday in June. Employees may request reimbursement for professional enrichment expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 132, or any other applicable state and federal law. Employees must receive approval from their Appointing Authority and the City Manager's designee before funds may be claimed for reimbursement. Reimbursements are on a first come,y first serve basis until the funds have been exhausted. Page 11 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 178 of 768 17.Severance Pay In the event a Senior Manager is terminated without cause,,l he or she shall receive compensation in a lump sum cash payment equal to three (3) months of his or her annual salary. The aforementioned severance pay shall not be reduced duringi the term of their employment. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) Page 12 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 179 of 768 III. UNCLASSIFIED AND CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/ PROFESSIONAL GROUP LL EMPLOYEES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS GROUP ARE FLSA-EXEMPT; CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGERS/PROFESSIONALS ARE CLASSIFIED, UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN ATTACHMENT 1 ,— GROUP MEMBERSHIP LISTING. A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases — None B. BENEFITS 1. Actngi ay Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/ rofessionaIs shall receive Acting Pay when: a. They are temporarily assigned to a vacant position for a period of ten (101) or more consecutive work daysi; b. Perform the duties of a higher paid classification; and c. Receive prior approval by the City Manager or his or her designee prior to the assignment. Acting pay shall be: a. Compensated with a minimum of'five percent (5%) above current salary rate, up to a maximum of 20%. b. Effective the first day of the assiginment. 2. Out of'class Assignment a. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals shall receive Out of Class Assignment (OCA) pay when: They are assigned to perform the duties of a higher paid classification for a period of ten (10) or more consecutive workdays; and b. Receive prior approval by the City Manager or his or her designee prior to the assignment. Out-of'-Class Assignment pay shall: a. Be compensated with a minimum of five percent(5%)above current salary rate,1 up to a maximum of' 0%. b. Be effective the first day of the assignment. c. Not exceed twelve months. Note.- For clarification, OCA is differentiated from Acting tay in that OCA is granted to an employee remaining in their current classification, but performing higher level duties even though no vacancy may exist at the higher level. Acting Pay, is granted to employees assuming the duties of a vacant, higher level position for a period of time. Page 13 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 18,0 of 768 3. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System Cal ERS as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Effective 04/22/2011 **Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% (&_ 60 and Local Safety 3% 50, Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for Local Safety, but will also contribute the following amounts to the employer)s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the Cal ERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amount necessary tote employer)s side (GC 20516) so that equal sharing of' normal costs is reached. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute an additional 3.5% to the Employer's share for FY 20-21. This contribution shall increase o.5% each year until 50% equal sharing of normal costs is reached. The following is a summary of Tier 1 Cal ERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit Page 14 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 18,1 of 768 Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% (W 60 and Local Safety 3% Pension Contributions: PA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To meet that standard,I Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7%for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for Local Safety, but will also contribute to the employer's side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the cal ERS standard of equal sharingi of normal costs. Accordingly,I Tier 2 employees all make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amount necessary to the employer's side (GC 20,516) so that equal sharing normal costs until of' normal cost is reached. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute an additional 3.5% to the Employer's share for FY 20-21. This contribution shall increase 01.5% each year until 50% equal sharing of normal costs is reached. The following is a summary of Tier 2 cal ERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit Tier I: Local Miscellaneous 2% (&, 62 and Local Safety 2.7% Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied tothe cal ERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PE RA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard,,, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer's side (GC 20516) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave Page 15 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 18,2 of 768 D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit 4. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of PERS that a non-safety employee is disabled,, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balance may be applied to applicable PERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated,,, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers Compensation laws,, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 5. 457 Plan — Deferred Compensation Plans �Employees in the Unclassified and Confidential Middle Management/Professional Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 6. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2020, each Unclassified and Confidential Middle Manager/Professional will receive $14,990 to be used solely for approved employee benefits. b. �Employees hired by the City into a permanent benefited position on or before December 31, 2018 may allocate a portion of their Cafeteria Plan Allotment to a taxable cash payment. These payments will be paid to employees on a pro- rata accrual the first two pay checks of each month (24 times per calendar year). The maximum taxable cash option for calendar year 20,20,will be $9,60,01. c. mployees hired by the City into a permanent benefited position on or after January 1, 2o19 shall have no cash out. d. In the event of' increases in health care plan premiums,,, the City will split the cost of the increase 501/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan allotment will be increased by one-half of' the average cost increase for full family non- non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share ofthe increased cost will be added to the begiinning cafeteria plan balance of'the next available cafeteria plan year. e. From the Cafeteria Plan allotment, each represented employee must select coverage for him or herself under one of the City sponsored medical plans. However,1 if the employee has group medical insurance from another reliable source that is acceptable to the City of' Chula Vista Department of Human Resources) the employee may elect to decline medical insurance from a City Page 16 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 18,3 of 768 provider and apply the value, of the City's "Flexible Benefit Plan"' contribution to other available City Flex options. Any employee married to another benefited City employee who is covered under his or her spouse's plan may waive coverage under the Cafeteria Plan and will receive full credit. Any employee who declines medical insurance coverage may enroll in the City medical plan prior to the next open enrollment only if the employee involuntarily loses the coverage. Enrollment application must be received in Human Resources within 30 days from loss of'coveragie. The employee, through payroll deductions, will pay any premium cost in excess of the Cafeteria Plan Allotment. f. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, 'those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($12,,762). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. For calendar year 20120, 'the flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted to $,15,49o. 7. Life Insurance City pays for a group term life insurance policy with coverage in the amount of $50,000 per employee. 8. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for emplovees hired after January 1, 2011. 9. Short/Long Term Diisability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for middle management positions. 10.Professional Enrichment The Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals are eligible to participate in the City's Professional Enrichment Program. The annual Professional Enrichment Fund allocation for Unclassified and Confidential Professional Enrichment Fund of $15,600 is for exclusive use by members of the Unclassified and Confidential Middle Management/Professional group for conferences and training. An employee is eligiible to receive up to$2,000 per fiscal year for professional enrichment. Funds may be used at any time during the fiscal year. Fiscal year reimbursements under the City's "Professional Enrichment" will be closed the second Thursday in June. Employees may request reimbursement for professional enrichment expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 132, or any other applicable state and federal law. Employees must receive approval from their,Appontngi Authority and the City Manager's designee before funds may be claimed for reimbursement. Reimbursements are on a first come,y first serve basis until the funds have been exhausted. 11.Sick Leave Reimbursement/Conversion Sick leave shall accrue as designated inthe Civil Service Rules. Page 17 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 18,4 of 768 Employees using thirty-two hours (32) of sick leave, or less, during the fiscal year, shall have the option of converting twenty five percent (25%) of their remaining yearly sick leave to annual leave (vacation). 12.AnnualLeave a. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will earn two weeks (10, days) annual leave per year in the first through fourth year of continuous employment, three weeks (15 days) annual leave per yearn the fifth through ninth year of continuous service, four weeks annual leave (20 days) per year in the tenth through fourteenth year of continuous service, and five weeks annual leave (25 days) for fifteen or more years of continuous service. An employee may not accumulate more than three times the number of annual leave days accrued annually. b. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals who have completed at least five (5) years of service shall have the option of sell ngi ack a total of 104 hours of accrued annual leave two times per fiscal year in 52 hour increments. 13.Administrative Leave Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will receive eighty- eighty (88) hours of'Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 14.Holidays a. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will receive 24 hours each fiscal year for floatingi holidays (Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays, and Admission Day). b. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals shall also be allotted eight (8) additional hours of floating holiday per year for Fiscal Year 20201-2021. The eight (8) hours may be taken in the same manner as vacation leave. The eigiht (8) hours must be used in its respective fiscal year, may not be carried over to the next fiscal year, and may not be cashed out. c. The City will be closed on the following hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, Day After Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King dr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 15.Mileage Reimbursement Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/ rofessionaIs shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate,1 in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 16.Uniform Allowances & Educational Differentials Sworn public safety Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will be provided with the uniform allowances and educational differentials as specified in the applicable public safety MOU. Page 18 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 18,5 of 768 17.B l ngual Pay Those Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals who,, upon recommendation of their Department Head, approval of the Dlirector of Human Resources,, and successful completion of a bilingual performance evaluation will receive $,100 per month in addition to their regiular pay on the condition that they continuously utilize their bilingual skills in the performance of their duties effective the first full pay period after adoption. 18.S e al Assignment Pay Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals may receive up to 15% additional compensation when assigined by the City Manager to a special project. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) Page 19 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 18,6 of 768 IV. CONFIDENTIAL GROUP ARE CLASSIFIED UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN ATTACHMENT 1 —GROUP MEMBERSHIP LISTING. A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases — None B. BENEFITS 1. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Effective 04/22/2011 **Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% (&- 60 and Local Safety 3% 50, Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for Local Safety, but will also contribute the following amounts to the employer)s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the Cal ERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amount necessary tote employer)s side (GC 20516) so that equal sharing of' normal costs is reached. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute an additional 3.5% to the Employer's share for FY 20-21. This contribution shall increase o.5% each year until 50% equal sharing of normal costs is reached. Page 20 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 18,7 of 768 The following is a summary of Tier 1 Coal ERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit Tier Z: Local Miscellaneous 2% (&, 60 and Local Safety 3% Pension Contributions: PE RA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To meet that standard,,l Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution, (grit no EPMC) of 7% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for Local Safety, but will also contribute to the employer's side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the Cal ERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amount necessary to the employer's side (CSC 20516) so that equal sharing normal costs until of normal cost is reached. • Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute an additional 3.5% to the Employer's share for FY 20-21. This contribution shall increase 01.5% each year until 50% equal sharing of normal costs is reached. The following is a summary of Tier 2 Cal ERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit Page 21 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 18,8 of 768 Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% � 62 and Local Safety 2.7% Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied tothe Cal ERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PE FSA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard,,, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer's side (GC 20516) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public �Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of L v ngi Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit 2. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of CalPERS that a non-safety employee is disabled,,, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balances may be applied to applicable CaIPERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated,,, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers' Compensation laws,, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 3. Deferred Compensation Plans 457 Plan - Employees, in the Confidential Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 4. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2020, each Confidential Employee will receive $14,614 to be used solely for approved employee benefits. b. In the event of' increases in health care plan premiums, the City will split the cost of the increase 501/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan allotment will be increased by one-half'oft he average cost increase for full family non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the eginningi cafeteria plan balance of'the next available cafeteria plan year. Page 22 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 18,9 of 768 c. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans,,, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse's plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of'the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, 'those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($12,,386). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. e. Employees hired into a Confidential position on or before December 31, 2017 may elect to receive up to $9,,110O of' unused funds as a taxable cash option. The maximum an employee can cash out each year cannot exceed the cash option that they received inthe previous calendar year. f. Employees hired into a Confidential position on or after January 1, 2018 shall not cash out unused cafeteria plan funds. 5. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of' the short/longi-term disability insurance premium for the Confidential employees. 6. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1,1 2011. 7. Professional Enrichment The Confidential Employees Professional Enrichment Fund of $6,1250 is for exclusive use by members of the Confidential Employees for conferences and trainingi. Employees may receive up to a maximum of$2,000 per fiscal year. Funds may be used at any time during the fiscal year. Fiscal year reimbursements under the City's "Professional Enrichment)7 will be closed the second Thursday in June. Employees may request reimbursement for professional enrichment expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 132, or any other applicable state and federal law. Employees must receive approval from their Appointing Authority and the City Manag�er's desiginee before funds may be claimed for reimbursement. Reimbursements are on a first come, first serve basis until the funds have been exhausted. 8. Life Insurance City pays for a Group Term Life and AD&D, insurance policy with coverage in the amount of$50,000 per employee. Page 23 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 190 of 768 9. Sick Leave Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service �Rules. 1O.AnnualLeave 1. Employees will accrue 80-hours duringi the first through fourth years of service (cumulative to a total leave balance of 2401-hours). This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 3.0 7 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. 2. Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 1201-hours (cumulative to a total leave balance of 360-hours) during the fifth through ninth year of service. The benefits will be accumulated at the rate of 4.60, working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. 3. Employees will accrue and be eligiible to receive 16o-hours (cumulative to a total leave balance of 480-hours) during the tenth through fourteenth years of service. This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 6.14 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. 4. Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 20101-hours (cumulative to a total leave balance of'600-hours) duringi the fifteenth and succeeding years of service. This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 7.70 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of'service performed. 5. Vacation accrual rate changes will become effective at the eginn ngi of the pay period closest to the actual date which includes the employee anniversary date of benefited status. 6. Vacation sell back — All Confidential unrepresented classifications who have completed at least five (5) years of service all have the option of selling up to 60-hours of' said vacation back tote City one time per fiscal year. The accumulated vacation balance will be reduced accordingly. 7. Each part-time Confidential unrepresented employee paid at a biweekly rate shall be entitled to vacation with pay. The number of working days of such vacation shall be computed on the basis set forth in subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d) and shall be in the proportion that such part time employment bears to full time employment. 8. Employees separated from City service, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, shall be granted all of' the unused vacation to which they are entitled based upon continuous service computed on the basis set forth in subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d). Payment shall be made hour-for-hour with any portion of an our being considered a full our. 9. Vacation Use: Vacation leave balances shall be reduced for actual time not worked tothe nearest quarter our. Absences may not be charged to vacation not already accumulated. Page 24 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 191 of 768 11.Holidays a. Confidential employees will receive 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington Birthday's, and Admissions Day). b. Confidential employees shall also be allotted eight (8) additional hours of floating holiday per year for Fiscal Year 20,20-2021. The eight (8) hours may be taken in the same manner as vacation leave. The eigiht (8) hours must be used in its respective fiscal year,1 may not be carried over to the next fiscal year,1 and may not be cashed out. c. The City will be closed on the followings paid hard holidays: Independence Clay,y Labor Clay,1 Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, Day after Thanksgiving,, Christmas,, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Ir.'s Birthday,y Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 1 2.Administrative Leave Confidential employees will receive forty (4o') hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 13.Mileage Reimbursement Employees in this unit shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 14.Bilingual Pay Those employees who, upon recommendation of the Department Head, approval of the Director of Human Resources, and successful completion of a Bilingual Performance Evaluation,, and who are required to continuously use their bilingual skills in the performance of their duties, will receive $100, per month in addition to their regular pay effective the first full pay period after adoption. 15.S ec al Assignment Pay Confidential employees may be eligible to receive a maximum of 15% above their base pay when assigined by the A► pointings Authority or designee and approved by the City Manager and the Director of Human Resources to a "Special Project. 16.Out-of-Class Assignment When an employee is assigned to perform duties of a higher paid classification,,, immediately upon assignment, the employee shall be compensated with a minimum of' 7.5% above the employee's current salary rate up to a maximum of 15% effective the first day of the out-of-class assignment. If the out of class assignment lasts for duration of 6 months the employee will receive an additional 5% compensation. Increases greater than 5% must be approved by the Director of Human Resources. Requests for out-of'-class compensation shall be submitted by the Appointing Authority on a "Payroll Change Notice"' form as percentage amounts only. Page 25 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 192 of 768 17.Notice of Change in Work Schedule The City will strive to give at least fourteen calendar day (14 calendar days) notice to employees when management initiates a change in an employee's work schedule except in cases of emergencies. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) Page 26 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 193 of 768 V. MAYoR, COUNCIL AND CITY ATTORNEY A. SALARY & WAGES 1 Salary Increases As mandated by City of Chula Vista City Charter Section 302 the Mayor all receive an annual salary equivalent to 66% of the salary of a Judge of the Superior Court of the State of California. As mandated in City of Chula Vista City Charter Section 304(C),, the four Council members shall receive 40% of the salary of the Mayor. Salary adjustments will occur at the same time and be effective on the same date as the Superior Court Judges. As mandated by City of'Chula Vista City Charter Section 5o3(C) the City Attorney shall receive an annual salary equivalent to the salary of a Judge of the Superior Court of'the State of'Calif'ornia. Salary adjustments will occur at the same time and be effective on the same date as the Superior Court Judges. B. BENEFITS 1 Cafeteria Plan Cafeteria plans will be set at the level specified for Executive Managers. The cafeteria plan is to be used solely for approved employee benefits or to be placed in a taxable cash option. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans,,, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse)s plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only,1 those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2020 ($17,390). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. The maximum taxable option shall be $8,01010. 2. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1,1 2011. 3. Auto Allowance The Mayor may elect to receive a monthly auto allowance up to $,1,000. Council members and City Attorney may elect to receive a monthly auto allowance of up to $55o. The allowance is contingent upon evidence of adequate auto insurance. Page 27 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 194 of 768 4. Cell one Allowance The Mayor,,, Council members and City Attorney may elect to receive a cell phone allowance of up to $,60 per month. 5. Travel Reimbursements The Mayor and Council members shall receive reimbursement on order of the City Council for Council-authorized travel and other expenses when on official duty outside of'the City. 6. Stipends The Mayor and Council members will receive $501 stipend for attending Housing Authority meetings. No member shall receive compensation for attending more than four meetings of the Housing Authority during any calendar month. 7. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Effective 04/22/2011 Effective 01/011/20,13 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 6u Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for Local Safety, but will also contribute the following amounts to the employer)s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the Cal ERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amount necessary tote employer)s side (GC 20516) so that equal sharing of' normal costs is reached. Page 28 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 195 of 768 The following is a summary of Tier 1 Cal ERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 6u Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs all be the standard. To meet that standard,I Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7%for Local Miscellaneous,, but will also contribute tothe employer's side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharingi of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amount necessary to the employer)s side (CSC 20516) so that equal sharing normal costs until of normal cost is reached. The following is a summary of Tier 2 Cal ERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. . Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,0010, J. Prior Service Credit Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied to the Cal ERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PEPRA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard,I Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer 7 s side (GC 20516) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. Page 29 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 196 of 768 To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 1. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) Page 30 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 197 of 768 V1. UNCLASS]FIED HOURLY EMPLOYEES A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increase The minimum wage for all unclassified hourly employees will be set by the State of California or Federal Government, whichever is higer: Pay Period including January 1, 2o20: $,13.0o/hr. Pay Period including January 1, 20121: $,14.001/hr. The above increases may not occur if the scheduled increases are temporarily suspended by the Governor, based on certain determinations. B. BENEFITS 1. Retirement a. UCH R employees are enrolled in the Public Agency Retirement System Alternate Retirement Systems (PARS-ARS). b. The City pays 3.75% of the employee's salary into the employee's PARS-ARS account. c. Each pay period 3.75% will be deducted from the employee's salary and deposited to the employee's PARS-ARS account. 2. Sick Leave Sick Leave shall accrue pursuant tote Health Workplace, Health Family Act of' 2014 (AB 1522). (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) Page 31 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 198 of 768 ATTACHMENT 1 — GROUP MEMBERSHIP LISTING The following shows the classifications assigned to each group as of April 20201. A. EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP' City Manager (Contract). City Clerk (Contract) Assistant City Manager Chief of Police Deputy City Manager Director of Community Services Director of Development Services Director of Economic Development Director of Engineering/City Engineer Director of Finance Director of Human Resources[Risk Management Director of Information Technology Services Director of Public Works FA Executive Director Fire Chief Senior Assistant City Attorney B. SENIOR MANAGEMENT GROUP' Administrative Services Manager Animal Care Facility Administrator Assistant Chief of' Police Assistant City Attorney Assistant City Clerk Assistant Director of Development Services Assistant Dl rector of Engineering Assistant Director of Finance Assistant Dlirector of Human Resources Assistant Director of Public Works Budget and Analysis Manager Building Official/Code Enforcement Manager City Librarian Deputy City Attorney III Deputy Fire Chief' FA Deputy Director-SD, LECC FA Deputy Executive Director FA Director of SD LECC FA Director-SD LSCC FA IVDC-LSCC Executive Director FA Program Manager Facilities Financing Manager Finance Manager Housing Manager Page 32 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 199 of 768 Human Resources Operations Manager Information Technology Manager Marketing and Communications Manager Parks & Recreation Administrator Performance and Organizational Development Manager Planning Manager Police Administrative Services Administrator Police Captain Purchasing Agent Revenue Manager Risk Manager Smart Technology Officer C. UNCLASSIFIED, AND, CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/PI OFESSIONAL GROUP1 Benefits Manager MM-Confidential Chief'of'Staff MM-Unclass if'ied Deputy City Attorney I Professional-Unclassified Deputy City Attorney 11 Profession al-U nclassified Deputy City Clerk I Professional-Unclassified Deputy City Clerk 11 Profession al-U nclassified FA Cyber Security Program Manager MM-Unclassified FA Geospatial Intel Analyst Profession al-U nclassified FA Financial Manager MM-Unclassified FA Microcomputer Specialist Profession al-U nclassified FA Network Administrator I Professional-Unclassified FA Network Administrator 11 Profession al-U nclassified FA Network Administrator III Professional-Unclassified FA Program Analyst Profession al-U nclassified FA Program Assistant Supervisor Professional-Unclassified FA Public Private Partnership and Exercise Program MM-Un class if'ied Manager FA Information Security Program Manager MM-Unclass if'ied FA LECC IT Manager MM-Unclassified FA Senior Financial Analyst Profession al-U nclassified FA Senior Intelligence Analyst Professional-Unclassified FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Profession al-U nclassified Fire Division Chief MM-Unclassified Fiscal and Management Analyst Profession al-Confidentia I Fiscal Debt Management Analyst MM-Confidential Human Resources Analyst Profession al-Confidentia I Law Office Manager MM-Unclassified Policy Aide Profession al-U nclassified Principal Human Resources Analyst Professional-Confidential Principal Management Analyst Profession al-Confidentia I Real Property Manager MM-Unclassified Risk Management Specialist Profession al-Confidentia I Senior Accountant MM-Confidential Page 33 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 200 of 768 Senior Deputy City Clerk Professional-Unclassified Senior Human Resources Analyst Professional-Confidential Senior Risk Management Specialist Professional-Confidential Special Events Coordinator Professional-Unclassified D. CONFIDENTIAL GROUP' Accountant Accounting Technician (Finance/Payroll) Administrative Secretary Administrative Secretary (Mayor's Office/At-Will) Confidential-Unclassified Associate Accountant City Attorney Investigator Constituent Services Representative Confidential-Unclassified Executive Secretary Confidential-Unclassified FA Accounting Technician Confidential-Unclassified FA Administrative Analyst I Confid entia 11-U n classified FA Administrative Analyst II Confidential-Unclassified FA Analyst Confidential-Unclassified FA Executive Assistant Confidential-Unclassified FA Graphic Designer/Webmaster Confidential-Unclassified FA Intelligence Analyst Confidential-Unclassified FA Management Assistant Confidential-Unclassified FA Program Assistant Confidential-Unclassified FA RCFL Network Engineer Confidential-Unclassified FA Senior Program Assistant FA Senior Secretary Confidential-Unclassified Human Resources Technician Legal Assistant Paralegal Public Information Specialist Senior Council Assistant Confidential-Unclassified Senior Legal Assistant Senior Human Resources Technician Senior Legal Assistant The City of Chula Vista serves as a pass through agency for the San Diego and Imperial Counties High Intensity Drug 'Trafficking Area (HIDTA); HIDTA positions (with the"CBAG"or 7X designation)shall receive the benefit package detailed for the Executive, Senior, Muddle Management/Professional Unclassified, and Confidential group In which the CBAG or FA classification is designated. All HIDTA positions are unclassified. Page 34 of 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 201 of 768 zmr, ..' l IN III til v r :a C1TY' C,0UNC'1LSTIA, ""EMENT CITY, OF CHUIAVISTA r l 1 June 23,,2020 File ID: 2 -0251 „MITI RESOLUTION OF THE CITE"COUNCIL OF THE, CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM THE SA DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,636; AMENDING THE FY 2020/2021 CI PROGRAM BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR; AND APPROVING THE AGREEMENT FOR SHARED STREETS PILOT PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY AND SANDAG (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED ACTIONRECOMMENDED ° Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY As a result of the CO' ID-1.9 pandemic,traffic volumes,were observed to have decrease and the practice of social distancing has become prevalent. This has led to the proliferation of the concept of"Slow Streets'' or "Shared Streets," a worldwide movement to dedicate more street space to non-vehicular use, initially on a temporary basis. The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), created a funding opportunity to support cities in San. Diego County is their efforts to implement shared streets. Chula Vista was selected to receive$8,636 from this funding opportunity. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed activity has been reviewed for compliance with.. the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and it has been determined that the activity falls under a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) of the State CEC A Guidelines. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it has also been determined that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to State C QA Guidelines Section. 1.5301 Class I (:Existing Facilities) and Section 150611(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in: question may have a significant effect on the environment."thus,no further environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION Among the many consequences of the COVID-1.9 pandemic, reduced vehicular traffic volume has been prevalent worldwide, which has established conditions conducive to implementing "Slow Streets" or " . community level. Shared. Streets is a worldwide movement to dedicate Shared Streets initiatives at the commune PIi3ge I 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 202 of 768 more space, on public streets to non-vehicular road users. To facilitate implementing Shared Streets in the San Diego Region, SANDAG announced a funding opportunity to allow local agencies to propose,temporary Shared Streets projects for grant funding. Chula Vista proposed applying the funds toward closing Third Avenue from "E" Street to "H" Street to vehicles in the evenings as well as the construction of temporary parklet facilities. Parklets, are temporary conversions of on-street vehicular parking space(s) to pedestrian and/or park space to increase sidewalk and parkway area,thus encouraging walking,social distancing,and/or open-air dining. SANDAG selected Chula Vista's proposal to receive $8,636 from the funding opportunity as reimbursement for costs incurred to implement the proposal up to the awarded amount. This item would receive the grant funds and appropriate them to the existing "Neighborhood Safety Program" (TRF0327) capital improvement project,the existing budget for which will supplement the grant funding as needed. DIECISION,MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found that, Mayor Salas has real property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 2, sections 18700 and 18702.2(a)(7), this item presents a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal. Govt Code§87100,et seq.) for the above-identified member. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURRENYYEAR FISCAL IMPACT Adoption of this resolution will result in appropriating $8,636 in SANDBAG Grant funds to T1 F0327 - Neighborhood Safety Program. The grant funds may be supplemented by funding from T1 F0327 to construct temporary shared streets infrastructure. ONGOING FISCAL IMPAC oil No ongoing fiscal impact is anticipated as businesses are expected to maintain the parklet facilities. ATTACHMENTS 1. 5A TAG Shared Streets Grant Agreement to Contact: Eddie Flores, City Traffic Engineer P 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 203 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CI- ULA VISTA ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,636; AMENDING THE FY 2020/2021 CIP PROGRAM BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR; AND APPROVING THE AGREEMENT FOR SHARED STREETS PILOT PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY AND SANDS AG WHEREAS, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused a decrease in vehicular traffic throughout the San Diego Region including the City of Chula Vista("City"); and WHEREAS, said reduction in vehicular traffic has led to the implementation of"Shared Streets" initiatives nationwide; and WI-Ii EREASI to encourage local agency implementation of"Shared Streets" infrastructure in the San Diego Region, the San Diego Association of Governments initiated a funding opportunity available to regional cities and the county; and WHEREASI the City's proposal was selected to receive $8,636 from said funding opportunity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it accepts a grant from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in the amount of$8,636. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it amends the FY 2019/20 CIP program budget by appropriating $8,636 in SAND. AG Grant funds to TRF0327, "Neighborhood Safety Program"based on unanticipated revenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council, of the City of Chula Vista, that it approves the Agreement For Shared Streets Pilot Program, between the City and SANDAG, in the form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and directs the City Manager, or designee, to execute the same. Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering & Capital Projects City Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 204 of 768 AGREEMENT FOR SHARED STREETS PILOT PROGRAM This Agreement for the Shared Streets Pilot Program S618,6050("Agreement") is made as of the date of the last signature shown below, by and between the San Diego Association of Governments ("SANDAG") and the Funding Recipient("'Recipient") City of Chula Vista., Address: 276 Fourth Avenue City,State,ZIP:Chula Vista,CA 91910 Phone:619-476-5368 Fax: Emaill:eflores@chulavista.go,v Contact Person: Eddie Flores Tax I.D. No.:95-60,00690 Title of Activity("Project,"'):Third Avenue Village Shared Street Objectives: Fund materials and labor to construct temporary"parklets"; restrict traffic to local and MTS buses;full nighttime closure to vehiculla�r traffic. Parklets will)provide sidewalk extensions to support social distancing.Street closures will enhance active transportation safety. Location:Third Avenue from E Street to H Street Start Date(s):June 1,2020 The purpose of this Agreement is to establish the terms and conditions for SANDAG to provide Recipient with funding to implement the Project. A. Term The term of this Agreement shall commence immediately upon the effective date written on the top of this Agreement.This Agreement shall remain in effect until the Project is completed or July 31,2020, whichever comes first.The term of this Agreement may be,amended by mutual agreement of the parties. B. Approved Project Budget Recipient successfully appllied for Shared Streets Pilot Program fuiniding for the Project.SANDAG agrees to provide support for the named activity in the amount of$_8,636.00 C. Project Implementation and Oversight Although SANIDAG will be providing financial assistance to Recipient to support the Project,SANDAG will not be responsible for Project implementation or have any control of Recipient or the means or methods used to carry out the Project. Recipient hereby declares that it is independent from SANDAG and agrees that, in the performance of this Agreement, Recipient shall act as an independent contractor and not as an employee of SANDAG. Recipient has and hereby retains full control of all the employment, compensation,and discharge of all employees of Recipient assisting in its performance hereunder. Recipient shall be fully responsible for all matters relating to payment of its employees, including compliance with Social Security,withholding tax,andl all other laws and regulations governing such matters. Recipient shall be responsible for its own acts and those of its agents and employees during the term of this Agreement,,except as otherwise specifically provided,as an independent contractor. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 205 of 768 D. Insurance Recipient shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, insurance or evidence of self- insurance acceptable to SANDAG against claims for injuries to persons,or damages to property,which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Recipient, its agents, representatives, or employees. 1. (Minimum Policy Limits Required Commercial General Liability(per occurrence) $1001000 Commercial General Liability(aggregate) $100.,000 Workers' Compensation Employer's Liability As required by the State of California's statutory limits 2. Endorsements Recipient shall furnish SANDAG with certificates of insurance and any required endorsements,or evidence of self-insurance acceptable to SANDAG,effecting coverage required by this section. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. Endorsements must specifically state that they modify the policy language.All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by SANDAG before work commences. i. The Commercial General Liability policy shalll contain,or be endorsed to contain,the following provisions: "SANDAG, its directors,officers,agents,and employees are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Recipient including materials, parts,or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations." General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Recipient's insurance,or as a separate owner's policy. For any claims related to this Project,the Recipient's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects SANDAG, its officers, officials,employees,and volunteers.Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the SANDAG, its officers, officials,employees,or volunteers shall be excess of the Recipient's insurance and shall not contribute with it. ii. The Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability policy or policies shall contain,or be endorsed to contain,the following provisions: Recipient hereby grants to SANDAG a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of Recipient may acquire against SANDAG by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Recipient agrees to obtain an endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not SANDAG has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. iii. No Limitation on Liabilities and Obligations The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Recipient, and any approval of said insurance by SANDAG are not intended to and shall SANDAG 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Shared Streets Pilot Program —Sample Agreement 12 Page 206 of 768 not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Recipient pursuant to this Agreement, including, Ibut not limited to,the provisions concerning indemnification. E. No SANDAG obligations to Third Parties In connection with the Project,the Recipient agrees that SANDAL shall not be subject to any obligations or liabilities to any subrecipient, lessee,third-party contractor,or other person or entity that is not a party to the Agreement for the Project. F. Indemnificafion Recipient agrees to defend,indemnify, protect,and hold SANIDAG and its directors,officers,and employees harmless from and against any and allI claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to any person or property,including injury to the Recipient"s or,its subcontractors'employees,agents,or,officers, which arise from,or are connected with or are caused or claimed to be caused by the negligent, reckless,or willful acts or omissions of Recipient and its subcontractors and their agents,officers,or employees,in performing the work or services herein,and all expenses of investigating and defending against same, including attorney's fees and costs; provided, however,that the Recipient's duty to indemnify and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liability arising from the established sole negligence or willful misconduct of SANDAL,its directors,agents,officers,or employees. Recipient shall have no authority, express or implied,to act on behalf of or bind SANDAL or its members,,agents or employees in any capacity whatsoever,as an agent or otherwise. G. Project Schedule and Payments Recipient shall make dilligent and timely progress toward completion of the Project within the timelines set forth in the Project Schedule,which is included below. In,the event Recipient encounters difficulty in meeting the Project Schedule or anticipates difficulty in complying with the Project Schedule, Recipient shall immediately notify SANDAL in writing to shiare dstreets sari dag.org, and shall provide pertinent details, including the reason(s)for the delay in performance and the date by which Recipient expects to complete performance. Recipient's notification shall be informational in character only and SANDAL receipt of it shall not be construed as a waiver by SANDAL of a Project delivery schedule or date,or any rights or remedies provided by this Agreement. Pre-award costs that are necessary for efficient and timely performance of the Project which are incurred prior to the effective date of the Agreement in anticipation of the funding award are allowable costs only to the extent that they are otherwise allowable under 2 CFR 200 and the Program requirements. Costs not specifically included in the Project Budget are only allowable with prior written approval of SANDAG. Within 30 calendar days following Project implementation but no later than duly 31,2020,the Recipient agrees to submit a final certification of Project expenses and final report. If the Recipient fails to provide a final certification of Project expenses and final report within 3,0 days of Project implementation or by Jiuly 31, 2020(whichever date comes last),the Recipient will not be eligible for reimbursement., Project Milestone CompIetion Deadlines 1. Project Implementation Notice to Proceed to June 30,2020 2. Final Report Due July 31, 2020, SANDAG 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Shared Streets Pilot Program —Sample Agreement 13 Page 207 of 768 H. Reporting Requirements Upon the Project's completion,the Recipient will provide SANDAG with a final report that summarizes the, Project to include: A. Description of the Project's activities, challenges,successes,and estimated impact. B. At least a total of 15 digital photos of the funded Project; photos should be high resolution (at least 4 inches by 6 inches with a minimum of 300 pixels per inch) and include captions with project descriptions, dates,and locations. C. Copies of press releases or other communications materials used to promote the Project; social media posts are encouraged to highlight funding support from @SANDAG. 1. Termination for Cause Termination for cause shall be merited in the event of a material breach of this Agreement. Events of material breach shall include, but not be limited to,failure to adhere to the Project time schedule,failure to maintain required insurance, bankruptcy,failure to pay any subcontractor or other company or person retained by Recipient in connection with this Agreement, or Recipient negligently or intentionally disregards laws,ordinances, rules, regulations,or orders,of any public authority having jurisdiction. J. Termination for Convenience K. SANDAG may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part., at any time by written notice to the Recipient when it is in the best interest of SANDAG. Recipient shall be paid its costs for work performed up to the time of termination if it is terminating for convenience. Recipient shall promptly submit its final invoice to SANDAG. No Project costs wiilll be considered for reimbursement after the notice of termination is given to the Recipient.Compliance with All Applicable Laws and Code of Conduct As required by federal law,SANDAG has established Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE) program under 49 CFR 26.Although no goal has been set for this Agreement, DBEs and other small businesses are encouraged to participate in the performance of agreements where applicable. SANDAG requires compliance with Title VI and Title V11 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA),the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, as amended,and all other applicable discrimination laws and civil rights statutes and implementing regulations.SANIDAG will not tolerate illegal discrimination or harassment by its funding recipients. Recipient agrees to abide by all requirements of applicable and relevant laws or regulations and will ensure that the Project complies with the eligibility requirements and ineligibility prohibitions for the Project as set forth in the Request for Applications(RFA), including the federal Cost Principles and Audit Requirements located at 2 CFR 200. Further, Recipient agrees to include nondiscrimination and compliance provisions in all subcontracts to perform work under this Agreement. SANDAG 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Shared Streets Pilot Program —sample Agreement 14 Page 208 of 768 L. Complaint Procedures Recipient is required to record and track complaints made by employees,volunteers, clients,or the general public, including complaints relating to Title VI,ADA,and service quality,or any other grievance pertaining to the Project. Recipient shall ensure timely resolution of complaints,and sufficiently document steps taken to investigate and address complaints. Recipient shall report compllaints to SANDAG and make these records available to SANDAG for inspection during audits. If Recipient receives a Title VI related or ADA related complaint,, Recipient must notify SANDAG in writing within 72 hours of receiving the complaint so that SANDAG can determine whether it needs to carry out its own investigation. M. Deliverables and Records Retention Recipient agrees that all deliverables it provides to SANDAG, including photos,shall be owned by SANDAG and shall Ibe free from third-party ownership claims. Recipient shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to allowable costs incurred under this Agreement. Recipient shall provide reasonable access to the representatives of SANDAG,or its designees, including representatives of the applicable government agencies if this Agreement is funded in whole or in part with state or federal funds,to such books and records and any other books,documents, papers,or records of Recipient that are related to this Agreement at all reasonable times during the Agreement period and for three years from the date of final payment under the Agreement. N. Public Records All communications with and information provided to SANDAG become public records as the property of SANDAG.As such,,they may be subject to public review. Please see SANDAG Board Policy No.015, Records Management Policy,which is available at sandag.org/legal,for additional information. 0. Media and Community Outreach Coordination, Recipient agrees to keep SANDAG up to date on the Project and media and community outreach efforts and assist SANDAG with media or community events related to the Project. Furthermore, Recipient agrees to provide Project information to support media and communications efforts.This includes Project photos taken throughout the Project or as part of Project tasks.The photos should Ibe Ihiglh resolution (at least 4 inches by 6 inches with a minimum of 300 pixels per inch)and contain captions with Project descriptions, dates, locations, andl the names of those featured, if appropriate.SANDAG reserves the right to use the information provided by Recipient for any combination of the following:social media posts,online photo albums,videos, press releases, PowerPoint presentations,web updates, newsletters,and testimonials. In submitting photos to SANDAG, Recipient agrees to release the rights of the photos to SANDAG for its use. P. Notice Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by email or mailed via first class mail to the below listed address. Notice shall be effective upon receipt thereof. For SANDAG San Diego Association of Governments 401 B Street,Suite 800 San Diego,CA 92101 Phone: (619)699-1900 Email:sharedstreets@sandag.org SANDAG 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Shared Streets Pilot Program —Sample Agreement 15 Page 209 of 768 For Recipient: As shown on front page Incorporation and Exhibits This Agreement and the RFA set forth all the terms and conditions for the Project between SANDAL and Recipient,with the Agreement taking precedence over the RFA.The folllowing exhibits are incorporated into and made part of this Agreement. Exhibit 1. Project Description Exhibit 2. Project Budget R. Signatures The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.This Agreement may be executed and delivered by facsimile signature and a facsimile signature shall be treated as an original). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above, written: SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS CITY OF CHULA VISTA ANTOINETTE MEIER Date GARY HALBERTDate Director of Mobility and Innovation City Manager SANDAG 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Shared Streets Pilot Program —Sample Agreement 16 Page 210 of 768 EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project consists of two components: "parklet" seating areas occupying existing on-street parking spaces for use by area restaurant patrons and nightly closure of Third Avenue.The Third Avenue Streetscape Capital Improvement Project is currently in progress on Third Avenue from E Street to F Street.Therefore., the Project would accommodate the temporary traffic control necessary for ongoing construction operations on the roadway medians and crossings. Parklets The grant would fund materials and labor to construct temporary "'parklets" along the project corridor. The parklets would occupy three existing on-street diagonal parking spaces each (26'xM'), effectively operating as an extension of the existing curb,extensions on the street corners and mid-block crossings. The parklets are intended to be communal spaces for use by restaurant patrons to enjoy their food and beverage at a safe distance. The parklets will consist of sidewalk extensions that will provide enhanced opportunities,for social distancing, walking, and potentially "on street" dining.As funding allows, additional shared street corridors and parklets will be implemented. In addition,vehicular traffic on Third Avenue from E Street to H Street would be restricted to local traffic and MTS buses.Traffic on intermediate intersecting streets would continue to flow unrestricted as temporary construction traffic control permits. Nighttime Closures In evenings (specific times to be determined),the Third Avenue Village corridor would transition to full closure to vehicular traffic except for MTS buses if alternate bus routes down Fourth Avenue cannot be accommodated. This would allow for the Third Avenue Village to become a pedestrian promenade each night for residents to use the full width of Third Avenue for recreation and potentially dining. Grant funds may be applied toward materials and labor to install and operate temporary traffic control measures for this operation. The nightly street closures will significantly reduce vehicular traffic volumes/speeds and as a result enhance safety for non-motorized users.The safety enhancement is expected to encourage even the more novice bike riders to become more active., Outreach At a minimum, the City will provide outreach through the City's newsletter,, City's website and its various social media (Twitter, Next Door,, Facebook,, etc.) outlets. Impact Assessment The City will use a qualitative approach based on city staff observations and community input to assess the impact of the Project. SANDAG 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Shared Streets Pilot Program —Sample Agreement 17 Page 211 of 768 EXHIBIT 2 PROIJECT' BUDGET Funds shall be applied toward the purchase of temporary traffic control devices to supplement the City's existing stock of temporary traffic control devices that will also be used toward this Project. Grant funds shall also apply toward labor and equipment costs for,City staff to install and operate the temporary traffic control devices., (Quantities and materials listed below may change depending on availability of City's existing stock of temporary traffic, control devices}, w.- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- .R- .-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.............................. Expenae Qty, uft,41,�cos""t, Deteflption, Estimated, AnkIi Tra Ili c,bia ril i a i,fo r P a i,*,I e,t 3�600,00 0,vigl Ve's, t r�F i I I (10,A i,ri 0,r, 10(i S' 35 0,10 0, ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 111,01 M 00 2 Druim_Chan ruwiz@,�r S 70,00 "1 ra lfi c,b a,rel 10,r 00�,a rk."O,0'(,0 e J��,O 0 k,10, I't .......... kii m i n u ni C ii,i lir b�R ot iI ip 2 S 00 F(j,r,ADA park,le, S 32960 0'01 .......................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................... '�)O C'IH5� Equipmwilt(111111410 4 8 0 DO IL is b r Slisrf Tiiirm*,aijw�J ............................ ........................................................................... 51, S mlu 0 'S" S S 0,00 $ .............. 0,00 $ 0 00 $ 0,010 $ 0,010 $ ............... 15, ..................... ............. 'To ta 1 5"Go, 0 C'ej, ANDAG 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Shared Streets Pilot Program —Sample Agreement 18 Page 212 of 768 zmr, ..' l v r r IN III til C1TY' C,0UNC'1L A,GEN' DA S,TIA, "nEMENT l 1 CITY, OF CHUIAVISTA June 23,2020 File ID: 20-0203 „MITI RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2020 REGIONAL ANALYSIS of IMPEDIMENTS, To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (AI) ANIS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE To CERTIFY ANIS SUBMIT THE Al To THE U.S. DEPARTMENT of HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) ACTIONRECOMMENDED " Council accept the report and adopt the Resolution. SUMMARY The Department of Housing and. Urban Development (HUD) requires that all entitlement communities receiving Community Development Bloch Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (H o M E) funds prepare an Analysis to Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) and update the report every five years. In addition,all Housing Element updates require jurisdictions to affirmatively further fair housing and include an Al. The Al identifies the fair housing impediments that affect both the region and the City of Chula Vista and provides recommendations to remedy the impediments and to affirmatively further fair dousing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality .Act (CEQA) and rational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). 'The proposed activity is not considered a "Project 11 as defined under Section 15378(b)(5) of the State CQA Guidelines because the proposal consist of a reporting, action, is not for a site specific project and will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. Therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CFQA Guidelines, these activities are not subject to CFQA. Under NEPA, the activity qualifies for a Certification of Exemption pursuant to Title 24, Part 5834(a)(2)&(3) of the Code of Federal Regulations and pursuant to the U.S. Department of' Housing and Urban Development Environmental Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE mlll The Housing advisory Commission did not meet to discuss the Al due to the County of Sari Diego's Public Health order limiting,gatherings of any size as of,April 8, 2020 and in effect until further notice. t' . I 1 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 213 of 768 DISCUSSION The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (commonly known as the "Al"), presents a demographic profile of San Diego County, assesses the extent of' housing needs among specific income, groups, and evaluates the range of available housing choices for residents. The Al also analyzes the conditions in the private market and public sector that may limit the range of housing choices or impede a person's access to housing. More importantly, this Al identifies impediments that may prevent equal housing access and develops solutions to mitigate or remove such impediments. The Al is prepared as a condition of receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDI G) and HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The City is required to complete this update in conjunction with the adoption of City's 2020-2024 Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Con Plan). In addition,in accordance with California Government Code 65583(b)(10), as a component of a jurisdiction's Housing Element (HE), a jurisdiction must affirmatively further fair housing and include an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. As in years past, HUD encourages a collaborative approach when completing the Al. On January 2, 2019, all San Diego County jurisdictions entered into a Collaboration Agreement. The collaborating jurisdictions includes the County of San Diego (including the unincorporated areas) and the 18 incorporated cities. A regional approach to the Al acknowledges that many housing policies and market conditions are not bound by jurisdictional boundaries and provides a cost-effective approach to meeting the Al requirements. The Al is included as Attachment 1-4 of this Agenda Statement. The City of Chula Vista,along with other CDPD entitlement communities,contracted with Veronica Tam and Associates (VTA) to prepare the Al. In preparing the report, VTA reviewed previous Fair Housing Reports, Housing Elements,regional planning documents,and housing industry research for the San Diego region and the respective cities. VTA also held interviews with City and County staff, housing providers, members of private housing industry,fair housing service providers,members of the San Diego,Regional Alliance for Fair Housing, and other oversight agencies. Community outreach consisted of several regional community meetings,online and paper surveys,and social media posts. These efforts are further described in Appendix A of the Al (see Attachment 2). Public Comment Period The 2020-2024 was released for a 30-day review and comment period per the City's HUD approved Citizen Participation Plan and applicable Federal regulations. The Al comment period began on May 22, 2020 and will close on June 22, 2020. Residents and other parties are able to comment per the City's adopted procedures for virtual meetings and as posted on the Development Services website at https://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/development-services/planning/public-notices/public- notices. Once approved by City Council and any comments incorporated into the document., the final Al will be submitted to HUD by June 30,2020. Al recommendations will also be incorporated into the HE that is due to P �3ge 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 214 of 768 the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) by April 2021 (unless extended by the Legislature). Al Analysis Recommendations for City of Chula Vista. The Al has identified public policies at the jurisdictional level (see Chapter 5 of the Al) that can affect housing development, and therefore, may impact the range and location of housing choices available to residents. The 2020 Al identifies four recommended actions. These recommended actions,as well as staff's efforts over the coming years,are as follows 1. Amend the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) Chapter 19.90 (Affordable Housing Incentives- Density Bonus)to be consistent with recent updates to California State Density Bonus Law(found in California Government Code Sections 65915 - 65918). Efforts: Staff will bring forward an amendment to CVMC Chapter 19.90 by the Fall of 2020 2. Amend the CVMC Sections 19.58.022 and 19.58.023 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) and Jr.ADU to be consistent with recent updates to California Government Code Section 658,52.,2. Efforts: Staff will bring forward an amendment to the CVMC Sections 19.58.022 and 19.58.023 by the Winter of 2020 3. Amend Title 19 of the CVMC to address Low Barrier Navigation Centers consistent with Assembly Bill 101 and found in California Government Code Sections 65660 - 65668 and Emergency Shelter Capacity and Parking Standards found in Government Code Section 65583. I Effo,rts. Staff will bring forward an amendment to the CVMC Sections 19.58.022 and 19.58.023 by the Winter of 2020 4. Update the City's ADA Transition Plan as required by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Transition Plan (also known as a Program Access Plan) identifies physical obstacles that limit the accessibility of facilities to individuals with disabilities, describes the prescribed methods to make the facilities accessible, provides a schedule for making the access modifications, and identifies the public officials responsible for implementation of the transition plan. Efforts. Meet with staff to go over the requirements to,update the plan and determine next steps. Conclusion The City of Chula Vista is committed to fair housing practices that protect against housing discrimination due to race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, familial status, age, marital status,, or sexual orientation, and places a high priority on promoting and ensuring open and free choice in housing for all persons. The City recognizes that free and equal access to residential housing (housing choice) is fundamental to meeting essential needs and pursuing personal, educational, employment or other goals. It is the City's intent to maintain and promote a nondiscriminatory environment in all aspects of the private and publicly funded housing markets within Chula Vista, and to foster compliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of the Fair Housing Act. The City will take the necessary steps to overcome these possible impediments to fair housing choice and continues to support its on ongoing fair housing P �3ge 13 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 215 of 768 efforts to educate residents as well as support affordable housing programs and policies as outlined within the Al. DECISION-MAKER CONFLIC'Ir Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the real property holdings of the City members do not create, a disqualifying real property- related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal., Govt Code§87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURREN'T-YE,AR FISCAL IMPACT Costs for the preparation of the Al is $175,000. The City's share of'such costs is $14,605,which was funded through the Chula Vista Housing Authority Budget. There is no fiscal impact resulting from accepting the report and its transmittal to HUD. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT As a planning document,acceptance of the report will have no direct fiscal impact to the City. No additional costs will be incurred in the submittal of the report to HUD. Costs associated with providing services and monitoring fair housing related actions are covered by the Community Development Block Grant Program. AT'TACHMEN'TS 1. 2020-2024 San Diego Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 2. Appendix A- Public Outreach 3. Appendix B -Detailed Home Mortgage Disclosure,Act Data 4. Appendix C-Outreach Events 5. Appendix D- Evaluation of Progress Staff Contact.-Jose Dorado,SeniorMan agementi ast-Chula Vista Housing Division P �3ge 4 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 216 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF C U A VISTA ACCEPTING THE 2020 REGIONAL ANALYSIS YSI OF IMPEDIMENTS FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (Al) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER R DESIGNEE TO CERTIFY ANIS SUBMIT THE Al TO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS,S, the City of Chula. Vista receives federal Community evelopment Block. (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funds from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)'; and WHEREAS,S, IµUD requires that all state, county. and local governments receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME finds prepare an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing ("Al") every five years; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code 65583(b)(10), as a component of a jurisdiction's Housing Element (HE), a jurisdiction must affirmatively further fair housing and include an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Mousing Choice; and WHEREAS, the Al identifies fair housing impediments that affect both the region and the City and provides recommendations to remedy the impediments and further fair housing; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista collaborated with other entitlement jurisdictions in the San Diego Region and has contracted withVeronica Tam and Associates to complete ete an Al on behalf ojurisdictions;t � a WHEREAS, a duly noticed public review period was held from. May 22, 2020 through June 22, 2020 to consider public input on.the Al. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITC RESOLVED by City Council of the City of Chula vista, that it accepts the 2020 Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it authorizes the City .Manager or designee to certify and submit the .Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 217 of 768 Presented by Approved as to form by Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 218 of 768 plmuuul 11% Ru6�fl091ll40 l�44 4p ��ooN� npaorv����nm�uu ���IIIUNOrvIImUWmuiu�mrcI�UpUN)D>yp"°MiP�NryW��111�r ., R,EG,,I'O'N' Iq1I4 1Vddk mulA irvttm wnpNn NNNw.. �iupy oiu)Y pArto.: IIAIl flnn,. nORR Ai�ulIq)I uiulp ivl"11aSO iiuN "A Nrvnory El iiuN PAux rcdvnd4111a1 ullf �iva uu��burtl k" rH ��,uo..�� ,��1ploy� 1p� IUNi olRiq� p° iq��0 N np�„�� 1 uu iUly �',u �L, 1� II ao � iwW NIhIUalAl414�. �� arvu iwd Muni ioiw 7Nrc�e Awa �uf iwa��vPNNNi�V����"ivawn emmN m�vm 1!purnnMxf'� aaaxn 1011101 pd�rera I��Vfu�uld�!NNtlryN�pppgp�,p. N�Nnroad NHAi�tld01 IImpnnrvaarcnpu� � 'aW! Irn�wA�aim�GNlppp:�'NNiI�"^�j�ryrypAli? ulwlu 4 i ������� r✓N yNr Ulla@AdPtln4M�nM i � � »'+n�lpu� 1111V r Vl q I1 ry� lV N D �� K q p��,o!Ntt 1naiv�. w��mrc ��iAumiu�� hwxw arNil uNm �m INuq�. i�pNlunreaaolW �ki,Npemuxkd�' r�l�ran��� �oaa arv��m�knan,l� ! �1��llvaamrrur� ��'BBfmm�llvm!aO�U��H ��um m�v� �;� �ax ,1��QJIIAuugdNN� ��mo� arv�� �UBnflvuniarea�7��� ,,,,m ��iuuxrrearur'fi�41 MAY 2020 Prepared on behalf of the San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing 0 ht�-tpoe//www.sdfal'rhousing.org/ 0 0 lijurisdi.cuons, City of Gtr1,s1),.,.1d City of National City y of Chula Vista Oty of Oce,,msidc City of on.- ado City of Poway City,of Encinitas (..'ity of Santcc i_,. _Lcmon . 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 219 o 76 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'I -W-4 rable of Contents ExecutiveSummary..................................................................................................................................ES-i Chapter 1: Introduction A. Purpose of Report................................................................................................................................1 B. Geographic Area Covered..................................................................................................................2 C. Fair Housing Legal Framework.........................................................................................................2 D. Fair Housing Defined..........................................................................................................................5 E. Organization of Report.......................................................................................................................6 F. Data Sources.........................................................................................................................................7 Chapter 2: Community Outreach A. Community Workshops......................................................................................................................8 B. Targeted Stakeholder Interviews......................................................................................................11 C. Fair Housing Survey..........................................................................................................................14 D. Public Review of Draft Ai............. 18 Chapter 3: Community Profile A. Demographic Profile .........................................................................................................................19 B. Household Characteristics................................................................................................................28 .......................................................................................................................33 C. Special Needs Groups D. Hate Crimes ........................................................................................................................................53 E. Income Profile....................................................................................................................................56 F. Housing Profile...................................................................................................................................66 G. Housing Condition.............................................................................................................................71 H. Housing Cost and Affordability..................................................................................................#74 I. Housing Problems..............................................................................................................................80 J. Publicly Assisted Housing.................................................................................................................84 K. Licensed Community Care Facilities...............................................................................................92 L. Accessibility to Opportunities..........................................................................................................95 M. ADA-Compliant Public Facilities (Section 504 Assessment)....................................................101 N. Exposure to Adverse Community Factors...................................................................................102 Chapter 4: Lending Practices A. Background.......................................................................................................................................120 B. Overall Lending Patterns ................................................................................................................122 C. Lending by Race/Ethnicity and Income.......................................................................................125 D. Lending Patterns by Tract Characteristics....................................................................................128 E. Major Lenders...................................................................................................................................129 F. Sub-Prime Lending Market.............................................................................................................130 Chapter 5: Public Policies A. Policies and Programs,Affecting Housing Development..........................................................132 C3� B. Zoning Ordinance..................... .139 C. Variety of Housing Opportunity....................................................................................................143 "T'tN,131 1'�'i of 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 220 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'I D. Building Codes and Occupancy Standards...................................................................................152 E. Affordable Housing Development................................................................................................154 F. Other Land Use Policies, Programs, and Controls.....................................................................158 G. Policies Causing Displacement or Affect Housing Choice of Minorities and Persons with Disabilities.........................................................................................................................................163 H. Local Housing Authorities..............................................................................................................163 1. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQ ..........................................................................164 J. Community Representation and Participation.............................................................................164 Chapter 6: FairHousing P�rofile A. Fair Housing in the Homeownership Market..............................................................................167 B. Fair Housing in the Rental Housing Market................................................................................171 C. Fair Housing Services......................................................................................................................176 D. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH .......................................177 E. Fair Housing Statistics.....................................................................................................................178 F. Fair Housing Testing G. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development............................................................1 H. Hate Crimes ......................................................................................................................................193 Chapter 7: Fair Housing Action Plan A. Regional Impediments.....................................................................................................................195 B. j uris di ctio n-Specific Impediments.................................................................................................201 List ofT b les Table 1: Community Workshop Locations....................................................................................................8 Table 2: Stakeholder Interviews.....................................................................................................................11 Table 3: Perpetrators of Alleged Discrimination........................................................................................15 Table 4: Location of Alleged Discrimination..............................................................................................15 Table 5: Basis of Alleged Discrimination.....................................................................................................16 Table 6: Reason for Not Reporting Alleged Discrimination.....................................................................17 Table 7: Basis of Alleged Hate Crime...........................................................................................................17 Table 8: Population Growth (2000-2035)....................................................................................................20 Table9: Age Characteristics...........................................................................................................................21 Table 10: Racial and Ethnic Composition....................................................................................................23 Table 11: Minority Population by Sub-region............. Table 12: Language and Linguistic Isolation................................................................................................27 Table 13: Household Growth by jurisdiction..............................................................................................29 Table14: Household Type.............................................................................................................................30 Table 15: Household C haracteris tics.............................................................................................................31 Table 16: Average Household Size by jurisdiction.....................................................................................32 Table 17: Residents with Special Needs .......................................................................................................33 Table 18: Senior Profile—San Diego County..............................................................................................34 Table19: Large Households...........................................................................................................................37 Table20: Disability by Age.............................................................................................................................42 Table 21: DisabilityCharacteristics...............................................................................................................43 "T'tN,131 1'�'i of 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 221 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P[-:,"Dl N4 E F"[`S'I Table 22: People living with HIV and AIDS (LWH ) ......... Table 23: HOPWA Program Resources.............................................................................................***#######47 Table 24: Homelessness Population by jurisdiction—2018 and 20�19 ....................................................49 Table 25: Farm Worker Population of San Diego County........................................................................51 Table 26: Hate Crime Statistics —2018.........................................................................................................55 Table 27: Median Household Income..........................................................................................................58 Table28: Income Categories..........................................................................................................................59 Table 29: Income Distribution, 2012-2016..................................................................................................59 Table 30: Housing Assistance Needs of Low and Moderate Income Households (2012-2,016).........61 Table 31: Income by Race/Ethnicity............................................................................................................62, Table32: Housing Unit Growth.............................................................................................................*******67 Table 33: Housing Stock Mix 2019...............................................................................................................68 Table 34: Housing Tenure and Vacancy......................................................................................................69 Table 35: Housing Problems by Tenure..........................................................................................******#######70 Table 36: Housing Age and Lead-Po�isoning Cases....................................................................................72 Table 37: Median Home Sale Prices byJurisdiction...................................................................................75 Table 38: Average Rental Rates by jurisdiction - Fall 2018..........................................................*************76 Table 39: Housing Affordability Matrix - San Diego County (201).......................................................7 Table 40: Overcrowding by Tenure..............................................................................................................81 Table 41: Housing Cost Burden by Tenure.................................................................................................83 Table42: Public Housing Units.....................................................................................................................85 Table 43: Characteristics of Householders in Public Housing Units.......................................................85 Table 44: Characteristics of Public Housing Waiting list (Households)..................................................86 Table 45: Housing Choice Voucher Recipients...........................................................................................87 Table 46: Distribution of Housing Choice Voucher Recipients...............................................................88 Table 47: Housing Choice Voucher Use Metrics........................................................................................90 Table 48: Housing Choice Voucher Waitlist...............................................................................................90 Table 49: Licensed Community Care Facilities by Jurisdiction.................................................................93 Table 50: Major Employers - San Diego County........................................................................................97 Table 51: ADA-Compliant Public Facilities ............................................................................................. 102 Table 52: Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity Entitlement jurisdictions............................. 108 Table 53: Opportunity Indicator- Poverty Rate—Urban County Participating jurisdictions.......... 116 Table 54: Opportunity Indicators —School Proficiency, Labor Market,job Proximity.................. 117 Table 55: Opportunity Indicators —Transit—Urban County Participating jurisdictions.................. 117 Table 56: Opportunity Indicators —Environmental Health................................................................ 118 Table 57: Demographics of Loan Applicants vs. Total Population...................................................... 126 Table 58: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Income (2012-2017)............................................ 127 Table 59: Outcomes Based on Census Tract Income (2012-2017)....................................................... 128 Table 60: Outcomes by Minority Population of Census Tract (2012-2017)........................................ 129 Table 61: Top San Diego County Lenders by City (2017).............. 130 Table 62: Reported Spread on Loans by Race/Ethrlicity (2012-2017)................................................. 131 Table 63: Housing Element Status for 2013-2021 Cycle........................................................................ 134 Table 64: Typical Land Use Categories and,Permitted Density by jurisdiction.................................. 136 Table 65: Off-Street Parking Requirements.............................................................................................. 141 Table 66: Variety of Housing Opportunity............................................................................................... 145 Table 67: Farmworker Employee Housing by jurisdiction.................................................................... 152 Table 68: Rent-Restricted Multi-Family Housing Units by jurisdiction............................................... 155 Table 69: Planning Fees by Jurisdiction..................................................................................................... 156 Table 70: Development Impact Fees by Jurisdiction.............................................................................. 157 "T'tN,131 1'�'i of 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 222 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'I Table 71: Land Use Policies and Controls by-Jurisdiction...................................................................... 159 Table 72: Potential Discrimination in Listings of For-Sale Homes....................................................... 168 Table 73: Potential Discrimination in Listings of Homes for Rent....................................................... 172, Table 74: CSA Clients Served (FY 2014-2018)*......... 178 Table 75: CSA Clients Served by Income Level (FY 2014-2018)*....... 179 Table 76: CSA Clients Served by Race ethnicity (FY 2014-2018 *.......................... 179 Table 77: LASSD- Clients Served (FY 2014-2018 ............. 180 Table 78: LASSD- Clients Served by Income Level (FY 2014-2018`.......................... 181 Table 79: LASSD- Clients Served by Race/Ethnicity (FY 2014-2018)................................................ 181 Table 80: Fair Housing Audit Testing FY 2016-2018............................................................................. 185 Table 81: Basis for Discrimination of Fair Housing Cases filed with HUD (FY 2014-2018)*.......... 191 Table 82: ClosinLy Categories for Fair Housing Cases filed with HUD (FY 2014 2018)*.................. 192 C? Table 83: Hate Crimes (FY 2013-2018)..................................................................................................... 194 List of Figures Figure 1: San Diego County Age Structure (2017)......................................................................................22 Figure 2: Minority Concentration Areas.......................................................................................................26 Figure3: Licensed Care Facilities..................................................................................................................35 Figure 4: Persons with Disabilities................................................................................................................44 Figure 5: Change in Hate Crimes between 2013 and 2018........................................................................54 Figure 6: San Diego County Household Income........................................................................................57 Figure 7: Low and Moderate Income Areas................................................................................................63 Figure 8: Poverty Concentration Areas ........................................................................................................65 Figure9: Race of Homeowner....................................................................................................................70 Figure 10: Childhood Lead Poisoning Risk Areas......................................................................................73 Figure 11: Housing Opportunity Index Trend (2010-2019)......................................................................74 011 Figure 12: Housing Cost Burden by Income and Tenure..........................................................................0/4 Figure 13: Public Transit and Affordable Housing.....................................................................................91 Figure 14: Licensed Care Facilities................................................................................................................94 Figure 15: Transit Service and Major Employers........................................................................................98 Figure 16: Transit Service and Publicly Assisted Housing...................................................................... 100 Figure 17: Distribution of Title I Schools and Low- and Moderate-Income Areas........................... 104 Figure 18: Distribution of Title I Schools and Areas of Minority Concentration Area..................... 105 Figure 19: Environmental Exposure.......................................................................................................... 119 Figure 20: Conventional Home Purchase Loans (2012 versus 2017) ................................................... 124 Figure 21: Government-Backed Home Purchase Loans (2012 versus 2017)...................................... 124 i'l"l 1,"i l 11 S, iv 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 223 of 768 Is u1101111100 �E Ex.............E('' `U"TI"V' U1`,MMA,W1ft AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE an Diego County boasts an estimated population of over three million residents, making it the California and fifth in the nation. Diversity among its residents, second most populous county in in terms of cultural backgrounds and socioeconomic characteristics, makes San Diego County a desirable area to live. To continue nurturing this diversity, civic leaders must ensure that an environment exists where equal access to housing opportunities is treated as a fundamental right. ,tilposysis of h-11 ed-i -as P itrlcl The communities within San Diego County have established a commitment to providing equal housing opportunities for their existing and future residents.This report,the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (commonly known as the "Al"),presents a demographic profile of San Diego County, assesses the extent of housing needs among specific income groups, and evaluates the range of available housing choices for residents. The Al also analyzes the conditions in the private market and public sector that may limit the range of housing choices or impede a person's access to housing. More importantly,this Al identifies impediments that may prevent equal housing access and develops solutions to mitigate or remove such impediments. Part 'lilI*l tlots The Al covers the entirety of San Diego County, including the 18 incorporated cities and all unincorporated areas: • City of Carlsbad N City of National City • City of Chula Vista N City of Oceanside • City of Coronado N City of Poway • City of Del Mar N City of San Diego • City of El Cajon N City of San Marcos • City of Encinitas, N City of Santee • City of Escondido N City of Solana Beach • City of Imperial Beach N City of Vista • City of La Mesa N Unincorporated County • City of Lemon Grove S11UNINIARN' ES-i 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 224 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'I Y, The San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDR.AFFH), comprised of representatives from the participating jurisdictions listed above, fair housing professionals, and housing advocates, helped coordinate the development of the Al, especially the outreach process. Communfty Worksh Six community workshops were held in communities throughout the County in October and November 2019 to gather input regarding fair housing issues in the region. The locations and dates of the workshops were as, follows: Area of County Locafion Date Central Region LISC San Diego, San Diego, CA October 30, 2019 1 Eastern Region El Cajon Police Department, El Calon, CA November 6, 2019 Northern Region Escondido City Hall, Escondido, CA November 7, 2019 Central Region Valencia Park/Malcolm X Library November 13, 20,19 Southern Region Chula Vista City Hall, Chula Vista, CA November 20, 20,19 Southern Region BILI r. Community Center, National City, CA November 21, 20, During the community workshops, several recurring comments were recorded: 1. Individuals and families in the following protected classes shared experiences of housing discrimination: • Homeless • Sexual orientation • Individual with an emotional support animal • Family with deported father • Women with adopted children • Families with children with autism • Source of income or type of work 2. Many people have difficulty finding and accessing information about Fair Housing due to lack of access to computer/internet, knowing where to get the right information, cultural barriers, and lack of education in schools. 3. Need to improve how information is provided to community members by relating messaging to people's lives, letting people know they will learn something, simplifying language and documents. 4. Need to make sure that there are representatives at different agencies and providers that can communicate in different languages of local community. Stakeholder Interviews In addition to the input given by representatives from local organizations in attendance at the community workshops, key stakeholders were contacted for one-on-one interviews about the Al. Participants represented organizations that provide fair housing services and/or complementary and silUkINIARA' ES-ii 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 225 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1,N`S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'I related support services. A representative from each of the following organizations participated in a telephone interview: Stakeholder Contact Alliance for Regional Solutions Mary Lynn McCorkle, Collaborations Manager October 30, 2019 CSA San Diego Estela De Los Rios, Executive Director November 6, 2019 Elder Help San Diego Robin Strickland, Housing Services Coordinator November 7, 219 John Kuek, Director of Integrated Community La Maestra Community Health Centers Services November 13, 2019 Legal Aid Society of San Diego County Rosalina Spencer, Lead Lawyer November 203 2019 National Alliance on Mental Illness Aaron Basila) Community Outreach Worker November 21, 2019 Regional Task Force on the Homeless Jennifer Yost, Director of Grants Management San Diego Housing Federation Laura Nunn, Director of Policy and Programs Southern California Rental Housing Molly Kirkland, Director of Public Affairs Association The following summary of findings reflects collective input from the interviewees: 1. Challenges to building community awareness include: • Keeping up with updates to laws and regulations • Identifying community partners to share information with and provide training • Resistance to change by homeowners • Language barriers 2. Common fair housing misconceptions and misunderstandings, include: • Difficult or complex laws and requirements, different requirements for different programs, and difficulty navigating process • Not understanding role of different agencies or service providers • Terminology and differentdefinitions or understanding of terms like discrimination, affordable housing, intent, or eviction • Lack, of understanding about different individuals or people who are homeless, suffering from mental illness, live in permanent supportive housing Fair Hous,in,g S,urvey The survey was available in multiple languages,including English, Spanish,Tagalog, Chinese, Arabic, and Vietnamese on the websites of the County and all participating jurisdictions. Hard copies of the survey were provided to a number of local agencies for distribution to their clients. The community SlUkINIARA' ES-iii 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 226 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A_1,N`S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'I workshop flyer, including links to the online survey, was mailed to over 1,000 housing and service providers, encouraging them to provide their unique perspective by participating in the Community Needs Survey. A total of 1,132 persons responded to the Housing Discrimination Survey. The majority of survey respondents felt that housing discrimination was not an issue in their neighborhoods. There were 305 persons who answered "YES" to whether they have personally experienced discrimination in housing. 0 Con111,1k.,J,Ility Profi'ilc Population Growth Examination of demographic characteristics provides some insight regarding the need and extent of equal access to housing in a community. Overall,San Diego County experienced a 10 percent increase in population from 2000 to 2010. From both 2000 to 2010 and 2010 to 2019,the cities of San Marcos, Chula Vista, and Carlsbad had the largest growth. All cities experienced a population growth in the last decade except for the city of Coronado,whose population dropped by two percent. The median age in San Diego County is increasing steadily. Based on the 2017 American Community Survey, 12.9 percent of the population in San Diego County was age 65 or over(seniors),with another 11.6 percent in the 55 to 64 age group (future seniors). Race/Ethn1*city San Diego County's residents have become increasingly diverse in their race and ethnic compositions since 1970.The County of San Diego became a minority-majority area between 20�00 and 2010,when the percent minority population increased from 45.1 to 51.5 percent. The proportion of minority population continued to increase between 2010 and 2017 to 53.8 percent. Race and Ethnic Concentration A significant portion of San Diego County's population is also foreign born. According to the 2013- 2017 ACS, one-fourth of the county's population is foreign born and almost 90 percent of them are from non-European countries. About half of foreign.-boy residents in the county are from Latin America and a large portion of immigrants are from Asian countries (38 percent). Hous i*,nion A c andCond*i t* Assessing housing conditions in the County can provide the basis for developing policies and programs to maintain and preserve the quality of the housing stock. Housing age can indicate general housing conditions within a community. The housing stock in the San Diego region is older, with a majority of the housing units (54 percent) built before 19'79 and is at least 40 years old (Table 36).The highest percentages of pre-1980 housing units are generally found in the older, urbanized neighborhoods of the cities of La Mesa,Lemon Grove,El Cajon, San Diego, Coronado and National City and will most likely have the largest proportions of housing units potentially in need of rehabilitation. Home rehabilitation can be an obstacle for senior homeowners with fixed incomes and mobility issues. Housing Cost and Affordability The cost of homeownership varies within San Diego County depending on the community. In 2019, the median sales price for homes in San Diego County was $594,9'09, an increase of 38 percent from 2014. Home prices vary by area/jurisdiction,with very high median prices in coastal areas such as the SlUkINIARA' ES-iv 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 227 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"F'S'I cities of Coronado., Del Mar, and Solana Beach, Imperial Beach and Lemon Grove had the lowest median sales price in the region. The countywide median home sales price in 2019 ($594,909) places home ownership out of reach for all low- and moderate-income households. When homeownership is out of reach, rental housing is the only viable option for many low-income persons. Adverse Community Factors The California of: of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment(OEHHA) developed a screening methodology, called the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen , to help identify California communities, that are disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution. The CalEnviroScreen reveals that high scoring communities tend to be more burdened by pollution from multiple sources and most vulnerable to its effects, taking into account their socioeconomic characteristics and underlying health status. In San Diego County, the areas indicated as having higher EnviroScreen scores generally match the geographic distribution of minorities-,low- and moderate income persons, and poverty concentrations. 6 Overall Lending Patterns A key aspect of fair housing choice is equal access to credit for the purchase or improvement of a home,, Particularly in light of the recent lending credit crisis. In 2017, a total of 37,949 households applied for conventional loans to purchase homes in San Diego County, representing an increase of approximately 41 percent from 2012. This trend is indicative of a housing market that is slowly recovering from its peak in 2006-2007. The loan approval rates varied somewhat by jurisdiction. Applications from the cities of Carlsbad, La Mesa, Poway and Santee generally exhibited higher approval rates (over 67 percent). By contrast, applications from the cities of National City, Imperial Beach-, and Chula Vista had slightly lower approval rates (.ranging from 57 percent to 61 percent). In 2012,the cities of La Mesa,Carlsbad,and Poway recorded the highest home loan approval rates;these approval rates ranged from 74 to 76 percent. The cities with the lowest loan approval rates were the same in 2012 as in 2017 (Imperial Beach, Chula Vista, and National City, under 65 percent). Aside from income, another ma)or impediment to securing a home loan is insufficient understanding of the homebuying and lending processes. About 14 percent of all applications countywide were withdrawn by the applicants or deemed incomplete by the financial institution in 2012. The rate of withdrawn or incomplete applications,was higher in 20,17 (21 percent). Lending by :Race Funic ox In an ideal environment, the applicant pool for mortgage lending should be reflective of the demographics of a community. When one racial/ethnic group is overrepresented or underrepresented in the total applicant pool, it could be an indicator of unequal access to housing opportunities. Throughout San Diego County, White applicants were noticeably overrepresented in the loan applicant pool, while Hispanics were severely underrepresented. The underrepresentation of Hispanics was most acute in the cities of Escondido (-33 percent), Vista (-32 percent), and Imperial Beach (-30 percent). silUkINIARA' ES-v 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 228 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'I Tot) Lenders In 2017, about 38 percent (39,017 applications) of all loan applications in San Diego County were submitted to one of the County's top, ten lenders. The top two lenders in the county in 2017 were Wells Fargo Bank and JP Morgan Chase Bank. Subpri*me Lend* . Subprime lending can both impede and extend fair housing choice.While Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA data does not classify loans as subprime, it does track. the interest rate spread on loans. In 2005, the Federal Reserve Board required lenders, to report rate spreads for loans whose Annual Percentage Rate (APR) was above the U.S. Department of the Treasury benchmark. Loans with a reported spread are typically referred to as higher-priced or subp,rime loans.The number of subprime loans issued has decreased substantially over time. In 2012, approximately one percent of all loans issued had a reported spread but, by 2017, almost our percent of loans issued were subprime loans. What appears to be most troubling, however, is that Black and Hispanic applicants seem to be significantly more likely to receive these higher-priced loans. In 2012 and 2017, Blacks and Hispanics were twice as likely as Asians to receive a subprime loan. White applicants utilizing subprime loans were limited. PI t"11-]*c Housi*ng Element Comphance Public policies established at the regional and local levels can affect housing development and therefore, may have an impact on the range and location of housing choices available to residents. A Housing Element found by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to be in compliance with State law is presumed to have adequately addressed its policy constraints. According to HC,D,all 19 Housing Elements for participating jurisdictions (including the County) for the fifth cycle (2013-2020) are in compliance. Zonl*ng Amendments to Remove 1 i mpedments to Sveci*al Needs Hous,i"ng As part of the 2013-2021 Housing Element update, most jurisdictions have already addressed the provisions for special needs housing. However, some jurisdictions in the region have yet to address issues such as: • Density bonus • Residential care facilities • Farmworker housing • Employee housing SlUkINIARA' ES-vi 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 229 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'I Fait`Hol".1sing Two agencies provided fair housing services to San Diego County residents: CSA San Diego County (CSA) and Legal Aid Society of an Diego (L.A. D). CSA San Diego County (CSA): Between FY 2014 and FY 2018, CSA provided fair housing services to approximately 1,000 San Diego County residents per year for a total of 6, 276 clients over the .L W five-year period. The majority of CSA's clients during this period came from El Cajon (3. percent), Chula Vista (21 percent), and the unincorporated County. Legal Aid Society of San Diego ( SD): Between FY 2014 and FY 2018, LASSD served over 19,000 San Diego County residents. The majority of LASSD client households during this five-year time period resided in the City of San Diego (53 percent), El Cajon (nine percent) and Oceanside (eight percent). In addition, fair housing complaints were filed with HUD and with the State Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH for investigation and enforcement: HUD: From October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2019, 414 fair housing complaints in San Diego County were filed with HUD (Table 10). About 44 percent of complaints filed were from residents of the City of San Diego. A fair number of complaints were also filed from residents of Oceanside (11. percent) and Chula Vista (seven percent). Overall, disability-related discrimination was the most commonly reported—comprising 53 percent of all cases (Table 11). Complaints concerning race (12 percent), retaliation (10 percent), and familial status (nine percent)were also regularly reported. Half of all complaints filed (50 percent or 206 cases) were deemed to have no cause and another 28 percent (115 cases) were conciliated or settled. F'air Hotising Based on the analysis conducted for this Al. the following is a preliminary list of fair housing impediments identified in San Diego County: ■ Outreach and Education: Fair housing education is identified as one of the most important strategies for furthering fair housing. However, traditional outreach methods of publishing notices and press releases in newspapers and posting information on websites are not adequate to reach the general public with diverse needs and interests. Outreach methods should be expanded to include other media of communications, and also utilize networks of neighborhood groups and organizations. ■ Enforcement: Rigorous enforcement of fair housing laws is most effective in deterring housing discrimination. However, not enough enforcement activities are pursued. Fair housing service providers should encourage victims to pursue litigation and refer victims to agencies and organizations,with the capacity to handle litigation. Also, favorable outcomes in litigation should be publicized to encourage other victims to come forward. ■ Linguistic Isolation: In San Diego County, 15.4 percent of residents indicated they spoke English "less than very well" and can be considered linguistically isolated. The cities of National City, Chula Vista, El Cajon, and Escondido have the highest percentage of total residents who spoke English "less than very well". Most of these residents were Spanish speakers. silUkINIARA' ES-vii 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 230 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"F'S'I ■ Segregation:Within San Diego County,there are RECAPs (Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty) scattered in small sections of Escondido,El Cajon,La Mesa,Lemon Grove, National City, and Chula Vista. Larger RECAP, clusters can be seen in the central/southern portion of the City of San Diego. ■ Lending: Throughout San Diego County,White applicants were noticeably overrepresented in the loan applicant pool, while Hispanics, were severely underrepresented. Black and Hispanic applicants also seem to be significantly more likely to receive subprime loans. The SD AFF and jurisdictions should meet with the lending community to discuss ways to expand access, to financing for all but especially for minority households. Public Policies: Several jurisdictions within the County have yet to update their zoning ordinances to address recent changes to State Law. jurisdictions should implement their Housing Element program commitments to amend the zoning ordinances in a timely manner. SlUkINIARA' ES-viii 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 231 of 768 AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE an Diego County, one of the most populous counties in the nation, is home to over 3 million ,,,,)residents and an increasingly diverse demoLrraphic.The County encompasses 18 incorporated cities and more than 25 rural and urban unincorporated neighborhoods and communities. Diversity among its residents, in terms of cultural backgrounds and socioeconomic characteristics, makes San Diego County a desirable area to live. To continue nurturing this diversity, civic leaders must ensure that an environment exists where equal access to housing opportunities is treated as a fundamental right. A. Pt,i��_,rpose o'', Report The communities within San Diego County have established a commitment to providing equal housing opportunities for their existing and future residents. Through the federally funded Community Development Block Grant (CDBG and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs, among other state and local programs, the jurisdictions of San Diego County work to provide a decent living environment for all. Pursuant to CDBG regulations [24 CFR Subtitle A §91.225(a)(1)], to receive CDBG funds, a jurisdiction must certify that it"actively furthers fair housing choice" through the following: • Completion of an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI); • Actions to eliminate identified impediments; and • Maintenance of fair housing records. In 20163 HUD passed the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (A.FFH, Rule that would have required the preparation of an Assessment of Fair Housing under the new rule. However, due to extensive comments from grantees,HUD suspended the AFFH Rule in 2018 and is currently working on amending the rule with simplified requirements. In the meantime, fair housing requirements revert to the 1996 Fair Housing Planning Guide prepared by HUD. This report, the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (commonly known as the "Al"), presents a demographic profile of the County of San Diego, assesses the extent of fair housing issues among specific groups, and evaluates the availability of a range of housing choices for all residents. This report also analyzes the conditions in the private market and public sector that may limit the range of housing choices or impede a person's access to housing. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 232 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'I 11 11110 Geograp11,11110, Area Covere(11 uuuoouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum The Al covers the entirety of San Diego County, including the 18 incorporated cities and all unincorporated areas: • City of Carlsbad IN City of National City City of Chula Vista IN City of Oceanside City of Coronado IN City of Poway • City of Del Mar IN City of San Diego • City of El Cajon IN City of San Marcos City of Encinitas IN City of Santee • City of Escondido IN City of Solana Beach • City of Imperial Beach IN City of Vista City of La Mesa Unincorporated County City of Lemon Grove 0 isiln gr Le g:ral. Frarllt-iclwol C. Hot Fair housing is a right protected by both Federal and State of California laws. Among these laws, virtually every housing unit in California is subject to fair housing practices. l e Federal Laws The Fair Housing Act of 1968 and Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (42 U.S. Code 55 3601- 3 19) 3631) are federal fair housing laws that prohibit discrimination in all aspects of housing, including the sale, rental, lease, or negotiation for real property. The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based on the following protected classes: IN Race or color IN Religion IN Sex ■ Familial status ■ National origin ■ Disability (mental or physical) Specifically, it is unlawful to: ■ Refuse to sell or rent of the making of a bona fide offer, or to refuse to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin. ■ Discriminate against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection therewith, because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin. ■ Make, print, or publish, or cause to be made, printed, or published any notice, statement,, or advertisement, with respect to the sale or rental of a dwelling that indicates any preference, 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 233 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'I limitation, or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin, or an intention to make any such preference,limitation, or discrimination. • Represent to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin that any dwelling is not available for inspection, sale, or rental when such dwelling is in fact so available. • For profit, induce or attempt to induce any person to sell or rent any dwelling by representations regarding the entry or prospective entry into the neighborhood of a person or persons of a particular race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin. Reasonable Accommodations and Accessibility The Fair Housing Amendments Act requires owners of housing facilities to make "reasonable accommodations" (exceptions) in their rules, policies, and operations to give people with disabilities equal housing opportunities. For example,a landlord with a"no pets"policy may be required to grant an exception to this rule and allow an individual who is blind to keep a guide dog in the residence. The Fair Housing Act also requires landlords to allow tenants with disabilities to make reasonable access-related modifications to their private living space, as well as to common use spaces, at the tenant's own expense. Finally, the Act requires that new multi-family housing with four or more units be designed and built to allow access for persons with disabilities. This includes accessible common use areas, doors that are wide enough for wheelchairs, 1-citchens and bathrooms that allow a person using a wheelchair to maneuver, and other adaptable features within the units. HUD Final Rule on Equal Access to Housing in HUD ProL:rrams C7 On March 5'. 2012, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published the Final Rule on "Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity." It applies to all McKinney-Vento-funded homeless programs, as well as to permanent housing assisted or insured by HUD. The rule creates a new regulatory provision that generally prohibits considering a person's marital status, sexual orientation, or gender identity (a person's internal sense of being male or female) in making homeless housing assistance available. I California Laws The State Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) enforces California laws that provide protection and monetary relief to victims of unlawful housing practices. The Fair Employment and Housing, Act (FEHA) (GovernmentCode Section 12955 et seq.) prohibits discrimination and harassment in housing practices,including: • Advertising • Application and selection process • Unlawful evictions • Terms and conditions of tenancy • Privileges of occupancy • Mortgage loans and insurance 3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 234 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P[-:,"Dl N4 E F"[`S'I • Public and private land use practices (zoning) • Unlawful restrictive covenants The following categories are protected by FEHA: • Race or color • Ancestry or national origin • Sex • Marital status • Source of income • Sexual orientation • Familial status (households with children under 18 years of age) • Religion • Mental/physical disability • Medical condition • Age • Gender Identity • Gender Expression • Genetic Information In October 2019, the California Legislature passed SB 329 and SB 222, expanding the Source of Incomeprotection to include "federal,., state, or local public assistance and federal, state, or local housing subsidies." 'Prior to these bills, Source of Income protection excluded public housing subsidies, such as the Housing Choice Vouchers, in the definition of income. Both bills went into effect on January 1, 2020. In addition) the FEHA contains similar reasonable accommodations and accessibility provisions as the federal Fair Housing Amendments Act. The Unruh Civil Rights Act provides protection from discrimination by all business establishments in California, including housing and accommodations, because of age, ancestry, color, disability, national origin,race,religion, sex,and sexual orientation.While the Unruh Civil Rights Act specifically lists "sex,race,color,religion,ancestry,national origin,,disability, and medical condition" as protected classes, the California Supreme Court has held that protections under the Unruh Act are not necessarily restricted to these characteristics. Furthermore,the Ralph Civil Rights Act (California Civil Code Section 51.7) forbids acts of violence or threats of violence because of a person's race,color,religion,ancestry,national origin,age,disability, sex,, sexual orientation,political affiliation,,or position in alabor dispute. Hate violence can be:verbal or written threats; physical assault or attempted assault; and graffiti.,vandalism, or property damage. The Bane Civil RiLrhts Act (California Civil Code Section 52.1) provides another layer of protection for fair housing choice by protecting all people in California from interference by force or threat of force with an individual's constitutional or statutory rights,including a right to equal access to housing. The Bane Act also includes criminal penalties for hate crimes;however, convictions under the Act are not allowed for speech alone unless that speech itself threatened violence. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 235 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'I And, finally, California Civil Code Section 1940.3 prohibits landlords from questioning potential residents about their immigration or citizenship status,. Landlords in most states are free to inquire about a potential tenant's immigration status and to reject applicants rho are in the United States illegally.' In addition, this law forbids local jurisdictions from passing laws that direct landlords to make inquiries about a person's citizenship or immigration status. In addition to these laws, Government Code Sections 111135, 65008, and 65580-65589.8 prohibit discrimination in State-funded programs and in land use decisions. Specifically, recent changes to Sections 65580-65589.8 require local jurisdictions to address the provision of housing options, for special needs groups, including permanent supportive housing for the disabled and housing for the homeless. Defiiwd. sin,cr aix In light of the various pieces of fair housing legislation passed at the Federal and State levels, fair housing throughout this report is defined as follows: A conditionin 2PI)icb * dividuals qf similar income levels in the same bousin in g market bave a like range qf cboice available to Mem, regardless q their cbaractefisfics asprotected under,Vtate and Federal laws. 10 I lousing Issues, Affordability, and Fair Housing HUD's Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) draws a distinction between housing affordability and fair housing. Economic factors that affect a household's housing choices are not fair housing issues per se. Only when the relationship between household income, household type, race/ethnicity, and other factors create misconceptions, biases, and differential treatments would fair housing concerns arise. Tenant/landlord disputes are also typically not related to fair housing. Most disputes between tenants and landlords result from a lack of understanding by either or both parties on their riLyhts and C? responsibilities. Tenant/landlord disputes and housing discrimination cross paths when the disputes are based on factors protected by fair housing laws and result in differential treatment. 71 5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 236 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'I I :fair Housing Impediments Within the legal framework of Federal and State laws, and based on the guidance provided by HUD's Fair Housing Planning Guide, impediments to fair housing choice can be defined as: • Any actions,omissions,or decisions taken because of the characteristics Protected under State and Federal laws,which restrict housing choices or the availability of housing choices; or • Any actions,omissions or decisions which have the effect of restricting housing choices or the availability of housing choices on the basis of characteristics protected under State and Federal laws. To affirmatively promote equal housing opportunity,a community must work to remove impediments to fair housing choice. E. Or g- al"ilzati(M a,f Rc )alrt This report is divided into seven chapters: Chapter 1: Introduction defines "fair housing" and explains the purpose of this report. Chapter 2: Community Participation describes the community outreach program and summarizes comments from residents and various agencies on fair housing issues such as discrimination, housing impediments, and housing trends. Chapter 3: Community Profile presents the demographic,housing,and income characteristics in San Diego County. Major employers and transportation access to job centers are identified. The relationships among these variables are discussed. In addition, this section evaluates whether community care facilities, public and assisted housing projects, as well as Section 8 recipients in the County are unduly concentrated in Low and Moderate Income areas. Also, the degree of housing segregation based on race is discussed. Chapter 4-. Lending Practices assesses the access to financing for different groups. Predatory and subprime lending issues are discussed. Chapter 5: Public Policies analyzes, various public policies and actions that may impede fair housing within the County and the participating cities. Chapter 6-. Fair Housing Profile evaluates existing public and private programs, services, practices,, and activities that assist in providing fair housing in the County. This chapter also assesses the nature and extent of fair housing complaints and violations in different areas of the County. Trends and patterns of impediments to fair housing, as identified by public and private agencies, are included. Chapter 7: Impediments and Recommendations summarizes the findings regarding fair housing issues in San Diego County and provides recommendations for furthering fair housing practices. At the beginning of this report are Signature Pages that include the signatures of the Chief Elected Officials or his/her desi�mee) along with a statement certifying that the Analysis of Impediments 6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 237 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 01 '.P' 1 P N4 E F"[`S'I represents the jurisdictions' official conclusions regarding impediments to fair housing choice and the actions necessary to address identified impediments. a 10 S o vi re C%c-A S According to the Elair HousinPlann ,GuideHUD does not re he jurisdictions to commence a ,g ing quire t data collection effort to complete the Al. Existing data can be used to review the nature and extent of potential issues. Various data and existing documents were reviewed to complete this Al,including: N 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census 0 American Community Surveys2 0 State Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates 0 Zoning ordinances,various plans, and resolutions of participating jurisdictions 0 California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division 0 201 8 Employment Development Department employment and wage data N 2012 and 2017 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (IFM A data on lending activities from LendingPatternSTI/I 0 Current market data for rental rates, home prices, and foreclosure activities 0 Fair housing records from the Legal Aid Society of San Diego and CSA San Diego County 0 Housing Choice Voucher (Section. 8) data from local Housing Authorities 0 California Department of Education Sources of specific information are identified in the text, tables, and figures. 2 The 2010 Census no lonLyer Provides detailed demographic or housing data through the "long form". instead, the Census Bureau conducts a series of American Community Surveys (ACS) to collect detailed data. The ACS surveys different variables at different schedules (e.g. every year,every three years,or every five years) depending on the size of the community. Multiple sets of ACS data are required to compile the data for San Diego County in this report. 7 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 238 of 768 COM.I'Nl JVIII0"I RI I A AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE his Analysis ofImpediments (AI)report has been developed to provide an overview of laws, Tregulations,conditions,or other possible obstacles that may affect an individual's or a household's access to housing. As part of this effort, the report incorporates the issues and concerns of residents,housing professionals, and service providers. To assure the report responds, to community needs a community outreach program consisting of community workshops, targeted stakeholder interviews, and a fair housing survey was conducted in the development of this report. This chapter describes the community outreach program conducted to involve the community. To reach the various segments of the community, i several methods were used to obtain communty1. input: ........... ■ Six community workshops /Wj ii1 i,P('�,71v� r � ( d V( ryI III I ■ Nine targeted stakeholder interviews to P10 service providers and local organizations ■ Fair housing survey Appendix A contains further background on the outreach strategy, public outreach tools, surveys, and summary of meeting notes. W"(11, PS As 11 C' Six community workshops were held in communities throughout the County in October and November 2019 to gather input regarding fair housing issues in the region. The locations and dates of the workshops were as, follows: Table 1: Community Workshop Locafions Area of County Location Date Central Region LISC San Diego,San Diego,CA October 30 2019 Eastern Region El Cajon Police Department,El Cajon,CA November 6,2019 Northern Re 01 9 Region.n Escondido City Hall,Esc(,ndido,CA November 7 2 Central Region Valencia Park/Malcolm X Library November 13,2019 C Southern Region Chula Vista City Hall,Chula Vista,CA November 20,2019 Southern Region MI.,Kjr. Community Center,National City,CA November 21,2019 Fi A,F,,117 R',2: 0UTJR1,d,A('1J 8 2020-06-23 Agenda Parke lt Page 239 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'I To encourage attendance and participation, the workshops were publicized through the following methods: • Multilingual flyers (print and digital) publicizing the six community workshops were mailed to 621 agencies, organizations, and interested individuals throughout the County, including a wide range of housing service providers and community organizations such as community planning groups, housing development corporations, service providers,, housing industry professionals,civic organizations,housing authorities,housing groups,business organizations, religious organizations, schools, and local elected officials' offices. • Multilingual flyers were posted on the websites of the participating cities and the County. • Multilingual flyers were placed at public counters such as city halls, libraries, and community centers. • Multilingual email-based ("e-blast") notifications through the participating agencies' email networks. • Content for participating agencies' and stakeholders' communication channels such as newsletters,public service announcements,websites, and cable television channels. • Social media posts to Facebook,Twitter, and Next Door. 10 Workshop Participants A total of 63 individuals attended the community workshops. Aside from interested individuals and staff from the various cities and the County, several service providers and housing professionals participated in the fair housing workshops. These included: • CSA San Diego County - Fair Housing • Housing Navigators Homeless • Housing Opportunities Collaborative • Legal Aid Society San Diego MA. C Project, 1C imball • San Diego Housing Commission • Solutions for Change • Tirey& St.John LLP • San Dieguito Alliance • Community Resource Center North Coast Community Z. Key Issues Identified In reviewing the comments received at these workshops, several key issues are noted: 0 1. Experiences with Housing Discrimination Individuals and families in the following protected classes shared experiences of housing discrimination: o Homeless 1-111 1A,F,,117 R',2: 0UTJR1,",A(`J-1 9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 240 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P[-:,"Dl N4 E F"[`S'I •Sexual orientation •Individual with an emotional support animal •Family with deported father •Women with adopted children •Families with children with autism •Source of income or type of work 2. Reporting of Housing Discrimination Incidents • Burden of proof is on individual who has been discriminated against • Costs and length of time for litigation are a deterrent for reporting incidents • Fear of retaliation, harassment, or deportation from reporting incidents 3. Barriers to Housing in Community • Many people have difficulty finding and accessing information about Fair Housing due to lack of access to computer/internet, knowing where to get the right information, cultural barriers, and lack of education in schools. • The information on what subsidies or options are available are confusing and the application process is confusing. • Many different languages and dialects. • The shortage of affordable units and long Section 8 waiting list. • Barriers are often layered 4. Protected Classes that Need Improved Services • Seniors • Individuals with mental and physical disabilities • Victims of domestic violence • Arbitrary factors • Country of origin 0 5. Misconceptions or Misunderstandings about Fair Housing • If prospective tenants have to pay for a back-ground report for every application • What qualified as, a reasonable accommodation request 6. Ways to Build Community Awareness about Fair Housing • Need to improve how information is provided to community members by relating messaging to people's lives,letting people know they will learn something, simplifying language and documents. • Need to make sure that there are representatives at different agencies and providers that can communicate in different languages of local community. • Go directly to communities to provide information at community gathering places, community centers,churches, schools,colleges,community and cultural events,senior housing complexes, and community meetings. • Partner with organizations, cultural and faith-based groups,, and organizations holding events to share information. Provide incentives and expand how information can be seen and heard. 1-1111A, 11" R',2: 0UTJR1,d,A("J-1 10 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 241 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVPN A-1 Y S1 S 01 '.P' 1P N4 E F"[`S'I 7. Other Comments • There should be a universal rental application. • Should tap into 211 Community Information Exchange to help share information. The comments received during these community workshops have been incorporated into this Al as appropriate and documented in Appendix A. T.1rcreted S ...........'(,"ery lews In addition to the input given by representatives from local organizations in attendance at the community workshops, key stakeholders were contacted for one-on-one interviews about the Al. Participants represented organizations that provide fair housing services and/or complementary and related support services. A representative from each of the following organizations Participated in a telephone interview: Table 2: Stakeholder Interviews Stakeholder Contact Alliance for Regional Solutions Mary Lynn McCorkle,Collaborations Manager October 30,2019' ("'.SA San Diego Estela De Los Rios, Executive Director November 6,2019 Elder Help San Diego Robin Strickland, Housing Services Coordinator November 7,2019 La Maestra Community I lealth Centers John Kuek,Director of integrated Community Services November 13,2019 l.,egal Aid Society of San Diego County Rosalina Spencer,Lead Lawyer November 2012019 National Alliance on Mental Illness Aaron Basila,Community Outreach Worker November 2112019 Regional Task Force on the Homeless Jennifer Yost,Director of Grants Management San Diego Housing Federation Laura Nunn,Director of Policy and Programs Luthern California Rental I lousing Association My Kirkland,irkland,Director of Public Affairs S 0 k' I I 1, Key Issues Identified In reviewing the comments received at these interviews, several key issues are noted: 1. Greatest Challenges to Building Community Awareness • Keepingup with updates to laws and regulations • Identifying community partners to share information with and provide training • Resistance to change by homeowners • Language barriers 2. Barriers to Housing in Community Large and diverse geographic area 1-111 1A,U,,11" R',2: 0UTJR1,d,A("J-1 11 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 242 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'I • Language barriers and different dialects • Housing affordability impacts and low vacancy rate • Difficulty finding a place to live with Section 8 voucher • Access to technology • Limited hours and transportation route options • Lack of awareness about services and resources • Miscommunications between landlords and tenants,and tenants and service providers • Individuals with mental and physical disabilities have difficulty finding housing • Large families have difficulty finding housing • Poor quality of housing and landlords that won't improve units 3. Misconceptions or Misunderstandings about Fair Housing • Difficult or complex laws and requirements, different requirements for different programs, and difficulty navigating process • Not understanding role of different agencies or service providers • Terminology and different definitions or understanding of terms like discrimination, affordable housing, intent, or eviction • Lack of understanding about different individuals or people who are homeless, suffering from mental illness,live in permanent supportive housing 4. Greatest Challenges in Meeting Fair Housing Needs • Under reporting of discrimination until after the fact, or due to fear of retaliation, or the length of time to pursue legal action • It is difficult to find the right information and staff at public agencies are overloaded with requests • Many homeless individuals don't have the right documentation to apply to programs • Section 8 waithst is over 10 years long • Lack of housing affordability is, causing people to leave California • NIMBYs and opposition to growth and siting of new housing 5. Protected Classes that Need Improved Services • Disabled individuals • Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual,Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) • Large families, • Tenants utilizing Section 8 vouchers • Seniors and aging population • Religious discrimination • Homeless individuals and families 6. Community Assets That Can be Leveraged to Further Fair Housing • Banks can promote first time home buying program • Community forums in North County • Community groups and centers • Pop-up events at transit stations, or libraries where there is high foot traffic 1-111 1A,F,,117 R',2: 0UTJR1,",A(`J-1 12 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 243 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'I • Postings on Next Door • Utilizing 211 to help direct people to resources • Providing additional education and resources including a resource binder at housing service providers and trainings targeted to landlords or propertymanagers. 7. Possible Improvements to Inter-Agency Coordination • Ensuing that landlords are involved in the discussion • Reducing bureaucratic layers • SDRAFFH Fair Housing Conference can provide a venue to develop a shared understanding of challenges and implementation • Shift focus to thinking about why rules and regulations exist rather than checking boxes • Create a shared database of agencies and programs • Provide additional training opportunities and avenues for sharing information such as email blasts • Collaborate with non-Profits to Provide wrap around services and trainings • Have City Council and Board of Supervisors on boards of different organizations 8. Ways to Promote Outreach for AI Workshops and Surveys • Provide notices and survey links to landlords and property owners • Place advertisements on billboards, at transit stops, or at churches, stores, swap meets • Share information at community centers, religious facilities, and with community leaders • Partner with elected officials or city staff to disseminate information • Link promotion of Al to other related topics such as homelessness • Send notification of workshops to individuals on Section 8 waitlist 9. Additional Comments • Recommend that landlords pest evaluation criteria in advertisements • Need more housing and Fair Housing should be at the center of the discussion about the housing crisis. • Getting information out to tenants about Fair Housing riLyhts and regulations is CD important • Supportive housing with other support services is important • Siting of permanent supportive housing should occur throughout the County within proximity to other services and amenities. The comments received during these interviews have been incorporated into this Al, as appropriate, and, documented in Appendix A. 1-1111A, 11" R',2: 0UTJR1,d,A("J-1 13 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 244 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 N`S1 S 01 '.P' 1 P N4 E F"[`S'I C 14 aix ):1,.,,1,sir1.( S'i J twe The Fair Housing Survey sought to gain knowledge about the nature and extent of fair housing issues experienced and to gauge the perception of fair housing needs and concerns of County residents.The survey was available in multiple languages, including English, Spanish,Tagalog, Chinese, Arabic, and Vietnamese on the websites of the County and all participating jurisdictions. Hard copies of the survey were provided to a number of local agencies for distribution to their clients.The community workshop flyer, including links to the online survey, was mailed to over 1,000 housing and service providers, encouraging them to provide their unique perspective by participating in the Community Needs Survey. Because responses to the survey were not controlled', results of the survey are used only to provide some insight regarding fair housing issues, but cannot be treated as a statistically valid survey. Furthermore, the survey asked for respondents' perception in housing discrimination. A person responding having been discriminated does not necessarily mean discrimination has actually taken place. i's Suri mary of Survey Results Who ReWonded to the A total of 1.132 persons responded to the Housing Discrimination Survey. The majority of survey respondents felt that housing discrimination was not an issue in their neighborhoods. There were 305 persons who answered"YES"to whether they have personally experienced discrimination in housing. Who Do You Believe Discrim' inatedAgajnSt yOU?4 Among the persons indicating that they had experienced housing discrimination, 59 percent (248 persons) indicated that a landlord or property manager had discriminated against them, while eight percent (35 persons) of respondents identified a Government staff person as the source of discrimination. Responses for the fair housing survey are not mutually exclusive;respondents had the option of listing multiple perpetrators of discrimination. 3 A A survey with a"controlled"sample would,through various techniques,"control"the socioeconomic characteristics of the respondents to ensure that the respondents are representative of the general population. This type of survey would provide results that are statistically valid but is much more costly to administer. 4 Because respondents could indicate multiple answers on a single questions,the percentages on these multiple choice questions do not add up to 100 percent nor do the total number answers add up to the total number of respondents. 1-111 Ak F,,117 R',2: 0UTJR1,d,A("J-1 14 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 245 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 01 '.P' 1P[-:,'JH N4 E F"F'S'I Table 3: Perpetrators of Alleged Discrimination Number Percent Landlord/Property Manager 248 59% Other 55 13% Real Estate Agent 36 9% C Government Staff Person 35 8% Mortgage Lender 35 8% Insurance Broker/Company 10 2% Total Responses 419 -- Notes: 1. Categories are not mutually exclusive. 2. Survey respondents were not required to provide answers for every question;therefore,total responses will vary by question. Where Did the Act ofDiscrim' ination Occur? Among the persons indicating that they had experienced housing discrimination, 38 percent (174 persons) indicated that the discrimination occurred in an apartment complex. About 21 percent (96 persons) indicated that the discrimination occurred in a single-family neighborhood, 10 percent (45 persons) indicated that it took place in a public/subsidized housing project, 11 percent (53 persons) indicated that it took place at a condo/townhome development, and another 10 percent (46 persons) indicated that it took place when applying for City/County programs. Also,three percent(15 persons) indicated that the act of discrimination occurred in a mobilehome park. Table 4: Location of Alleged Discrimination Location Number Percent Apartment Complex 174 3 8 YO Single-Family Nei ghborhood2 1('Y0 96 Condo/T'ownhome Development 53 11(YO Applying for City/County Programs 46 10% Public or Subsidized Housing Project 45 10% Other 33 7% Mobtlehome Park 15 3% Total Responses 462 -- Notes: 1. Categories are not mutually exclusive. 2. Survey respondents were not required to provide answers for every question;therefore,total responses will vary by question. 1-111'Ak11" R',2: 0UTJR1,d,A("J-1 15 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 246 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P[-:,'JH N4 E F"[`S'I go 0 On What..iasis Do You Believe You Were Discrim-inated Agginst? Of the 305 people who felt they were discriminated against, the most common causes for alleged discrimination were race, other, source of income, and family status. Table 5: Basis of Alleged Discriminati*on Basis Number Percent Race 105 160/() Source of Income 93 150/() Family Status 82 130/() Other 78 12% Age 60 9% Disability/Medical Conditions 54 811Y0 Color 45 7(,Yo Marital Status 40, 6% Gender 40, 6% National Origin 13 2% Religion 12 2% Ancestry 10 2`Yo Sexual Orientation 9 1(Yo Total Response 641 Notes: 1. Categories are not mutually exclusive. 2. Survey respondents were not required to provide answers for every question;therefore,total responses will vary,by,question. Requests for Reasonable Accommodation or Modil-i"cation Among those who responded to the fair housing questions, 25 percent (77 persons) indicated that they had been denied "reasonable accommodation"in rules,policies or practices, for their disability or a "reasonable modification" in the access to their homes. Wh IE Did Yo u No of Rep ort th e In ciden t? Of the survey respondents who felt they were discriminated against, 18 percent (54 persons) reported the discrimination incident. Many of the respondents (27 percent) who did not report the incident indicated that they don't believe it makes a difference. In addition, 25 percent did not know where to report the incident, 14 percent were afraid of retaliation, and 12 percent felt it was too much trouble. Fi Ak F,,117 R',2: 0UTJR1,d,A(`J-1 16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 247 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 01 '.P'dP N4 E F"[`S'I Table 6: Reason for Not Reporting Alleged Discrimination Reason Number Percent Other 150 27% Don't believe it makes a difference 138 25% Don't know where to report 120 22% Afraid of Retaliation 77 14% Too much trouble 66 12% Total Responses 551 -- Notes: 1. Categories are not mutually exclusive. 2. Survey respondents were not required to provide answers for every question; therefore,total responses will vary by question. Has Apv Hate Crime Been Committed in Your Neia_hbarhood? Of those who responded to the survey, seven percent (158 persons) indicated that a hate crime had been committed in their neighborhood. Most of these respondents (24 percent) indicated that the hate crime committed was based on race. Other notable causes of the alleged hate crimes include religion,,national origin, and color. Table 7: Basis of Alleged Hate Crime Basis Number Percent Race 86 24% National Origin 37 10% Religion 37 10% Color 36 1 o(YO Sexual Orientation 31 9(YO Source of Income 21 0YO Disability/Medical Conditions 21 0YO Age 13 4% Ancestry 12 3% Gender 11 3% Family Status 9 3% Marital Status 8 TY0 Total Responses 353 Notes: 1. Categories are not mutually exclusive. 2. Survey respondents were not required to provide answers for every question;therefore,total responses will vary,by,question. 1-111 Ak F,,117 R',2: 0UTJR1,d,A(`J-1 17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 248 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,N A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"F'S'I p eaft A.1 L"111"I" lic Revi.ewl of D The draft Al was made available for public review beginning in May 2020. During the 30-day public review period, the document was made available at City Halls, County Administration Office, and other public locations. The Draft Al was considered at the following public meetings: • City of Carlsbad— City Council Meeting,_, 2020 • City of Chula Vista—City Council Meeting, 2020 • City of El Cajon— City Council Meeting,June 9, 2020 • City of Encinitas,—City Council Meeting,June 24, 2020 • City of Escondido —City Council Meeting,Jeune 3, 2020 • City of La Mesa—City Council Meeting, 32020 • City of National City— City Council Meeting, 2020 • City of Oceanside—City Council Meeting, • City of San Diego—City Council Meeting, ) 2020 • City of San Marcos —City Council Meeting, 2020 • City of Santee—CityCouncil Meeting,June 10, 2020 • City of Vista— City Council Meeting,_, 2020 1-1111A, 11" R',2: 0UTJR1,d,A("J-1 18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 249 of 768 Ilii iim� luau OM.I'Nl J O"u"I",........... E AN ANAIYsis OF IMPEDIMENTS,To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE an Diego County,boasts an estimated population of over three million residents,making it the second most Populous county in California and fifth in the nation In. California, only Los Angeles County ........... has a larger population). Encompassing 4,261 square miles, San Diego County's borders include 18 incorporated cities and numerous,unincorporated neighborhoods and communities. The county stretches south from Orange County to the U.S.-Mexico border. The Pacific Ocean forms the western boundary, and the county's eastern edge reaches to the Laguna Mountains and the Anza-Borrego Desert. Like many major metropolitan areas in the United States, the minority population in San Diego County has increased significantly in recent years, especially among Asian and Hispanic groups. As this Chapter and subsequent chapters will discuss, fair housing issues tend to affect racial and ethnic minority groups, as well as persons with disabilities. The cost of living in San Diego County is high and getting higher than many other regions in the nation. Median household incomes have not kept pace with the rising cost of housing and living in the San Diego region, a trend seen nationwide. While housing affordability is not a fair housing issue per se,the increased demand for housing and the dwindling supply may create conditions where fair housing violations become a common part of the competition in the housing market. In an economic market where the need for affordable housing for the county's poorest residents remains overwhelming,various factors may affect the ability of individuals with similar incomes and needs in the same housing market to obtain a like range of housing choices. This section provides an overview of San Diego County's residents and housing stock, including population, economic, and housing trends that help identify housing needs specific to the region. This overview will provide the context for discussing and evaluating fair housing in the following chapters. AS Examination of demographic characteristics provides some insight regarding the need and extent of equal access to housing in a community. Supply and demand factors can create market conditions that are conducive to housing discrimination. Factors such as population growth, age characteristics, and race/ethnicity all help determine a community's housing need and play a role in exploring potential impediments to fair housing choice. 1, Population Growth Population growth in San Diego County from 2010 to 2019 was slightly lower than the previous decade. Overall, San Diego County experienced a 10 percent increase in population from 2000 to 2010 and a 8.3 percent increase in population from 2010 to 2019 (Table 8). From both 20�00 to 2010 and 2010 to 2019,, the cities of San Marcos, Chula Vista, and Carlsbad had the largest growth. All cities experienced a population growth in the last decade except for the city or Coronado,whose population dropped by two percent.The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) population projections indicate that by 2035 the county's population could reach 3,853,698) an approximately 15 percent increase from the 2019 population estimates. Several cities are projected to have larger increases between 2019, and 2035 than the 01, A 19 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 250 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ San Diego region as a whole, including Chula Vista, La Mesa, National City, San Diego, and the unincorporated areas of the county. Table 8: Population Growth (2000-2035) Total Population Percent Change junisdiction 2 2010 2019 2035 2000-2010 2010-2019 2019-2035 (Projected) Urban County Coronado 24,100 24)697 24)199 24,165 2.5% -2.0% -0.1% Del Mar 4)389 4.1161 4.1451 4,672 -5.2% 7.0% 5.0% Imperial Beach 261980 26)324 27)448 30i369 -2.4% 4.3% 10.6% Lemon Grove 245954 25)320 27)208 28,673 1.50/() 7.5% 5.4% Poway 48)295 47)811 50)320 53,162 -1.0 O/o 5.2'Y(,) 5.4'Y(,.) Solana Beach 12)887 12)867 13)933 14,207 -0.2% 8.3'Y(,.) 2.0'Y(,) Unincorporated 441)919 48604 515,403 617,570 10.1% 5.91Y(I.) 19.8% Total Urban 583)524 627,784 662X2 772,718 7.60,/ 5.6'Y(,) 16.6% County I I I I I I I Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 77)998 1051328 115,241 124)351 35.0% 9.4% 7.9% ("'.,hula Vista 173)860 243,916 271,411 326)625 40.3% 11.3% 20.3% El Cajon 94)819 99)478 1051559 109)383 4.9% 6.1'Y0 3.6% Encinitas 58)195 59)518 63)390 65)264 2.3% 6.5% 3.0% Escondido 133)528 143,911 152,739 172,892 7.80,/ 6.1' :) 13.2% La Mesa 54)751 57)065 60)820 70,252 4.20,/ 6.6'Y(,.) 15.5% National City 54,405 581)582 621)307 731)329 7.7% 6.40 17.7% Oceanside 1605905 1671)086 1781)021 1881)597 3.8% 6.5% 5.9% San Diego 1.1223)341 1,301.1617 1420.1572 1166509 6.40'0 9.117.2`✓/o San Marcos 55)160 83.178,1 98.1369 1091095 51.9 yo 17.4✓0 10.9 yo Santee 53)090 53.1413 58.1408 63,812 0).60 0 9.4(Vo 9.3(Vo Vista 90))131 93.1834 101.1987 111,771 4.1(Yo 8.'7(Vo 9.6(Vo .Total County 1 2)813)707 3)095)3131 3,351,786 31853)698 10.0% 8.3%1 15.0% Sources: U.S.Census Bureau,20,00,2010 Census;California Department of Finance 2019 Population Estimates(E-5);SANDAG Regional Growth.Forecast Series 13(2012). 2. Age Housing demand is affected by the age characteristics of residents in a community. Different age groups are often distinguished by important differences in lifestyle, family type, housing preferences and income levels. Typically, young adult households may occupy apartments, condominiums, and smaller single- family homes, because of size and/or affordability. Middle-age adults may prefer larger homes as they begin to raise their families, while seniors may prefer apartments,, condominiums, mobile homes, or smaller single-family homes that have lower costs and less extensive maintenance needs. Because a community's housing needs change over time, this section analyzes changes in the age distribution of San Diego County residents and how these changes affect housing need. 0", "d 1, A 20 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 251 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'Ai' As Table 9 shows, the median age has risen in all but three jurisdictions in San Diego County from 2010 to 2017.Median age decreased in Coronado,Solana Beach,and La Mesa.The county median age was 34.6 years in 2010 and rose to 35.4 by 2017. In 2017, the median age in the various cities ranged from a low Cif 31.9 years in Imperial Beach to a high of 50.7 years in Del Mar. Based on the 2017 American Community Survey, 12.9 percent of the population in San Diego County was age 65 or over (seniors), with another 11.6 percent in the 55 to 64 age group (future seniors). Close to 12.1 percent of San Diego County residents were school-age children between the ages of five and 14, and over 30 percent of residents were between the age of 15 and 34 (Figure 1)'. This age structure suggests the county has a high proportion of families with children and has a rapidly increasing older population. Table 9: Age Characteristics jurisdiction Age Category Median Age <5 5-14 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ 2010 2017 Urban County Coronado 4.91,Yo 9.51VO 19.3% 13.5% 9.1 IVO 11.1'Vo 13.81VO 18.7% 40.7 38.1 Del Mar 1.71,Yo 7.9% 3.7'Yo 15.8% 9.2% 19.7% 16.5% 25.6% 48.6 50.7 Impertial Beach 6.5% 15.10/6 16.1% 17.3% 12.60/6 11.7% 10.40/6 10.30/6 31 31.9 Lemon Grove 6.3% 15.40/6 11.5% 15.8% 14.70/6 11.6% 12.30/6 12.40/6 35 35.6 Poway 6.3% 13.70/6 13.0% 11.1% 12.10/6 15.2% 13.80/6 14.80/6 41.3 40 Solana Beach 3.9% 9.60/6 9.1 O/o� 13.7% 12.50/6 14.8% 13.70/6 22.80/6 43.7 46.1 Unincorporated 6.71,Yo 11.8% 15.7% 12.9% 11.6% 13.2% 13.1(Vo 15.0% N/A N/A Total Urban 6.51,Yo 12.1(Vo 15.3% 13.1% 11.7% 13.2% 13.1(Vo 15.1(Vo N/A N/A County Entitlement jurisdictions arlsbad 6.0% 13.91)'o 10.5% 11.6% 15.01)/o 16.3 Vo 12.5% 14.0% 38.9 40.4 Chula Vista 7.2% 15.69/o 15.3% 13.7% 15.2()/o 13.8 Vo 9.2% 10.0% 33.0 33.7 El Cajon 7.6% 13.5% 15.8% 14.7% 12.9% 14.3'Vo 10.1% 11.0% 31.9 33.7 Encinitas 5.4% 11. % 10.00/ 13.40/o 14.5% 16.9% 15.4% 12.8% 37.9 41.5 Escondido 8.1% 14.9% 15.40/o 15.00/o 13.5% 13.1% 9.6% 10.5% 31.2 32.5 I..,a Mesa 6.3% 10.0% 14.40/o 16.3 0/o 13.1% 14.5% 11.2% 14.2% 37.3 37.1 National City 6.9% 13.8% 20.90/o 14.70// 12.4% 12.0% 8.6% 10.6% 28.7 30.2 Oceanside 7.(l% 12.7/o 15.5% 14.5% 12.9()/o 14.0(Vo 10.5% 12.9% 33.3 35.2 San Diego 6.2% 11.5()/o 16.7% 17.6% 14.1()/o 13.2'Vo 10.1% 10.7% 32.5 33.6 San Marcos 8.4% 15.2()/o 15.3% 14.4% 15.8()/o 122'Vo 8.7% 10.2% 32.1 32.9 Santee 6.6% 12.8()/o 13.9% 13.7% 14.0()/o 1 6.3'Vo 12.0% 10.7% 34.8 37.2 Vista 8.0% 14.2% 17.1% 16.2% 13.2% 13.3% 8.7% 9.2% 30.3 31.1 Total County 6.6%1 12.7%1 16.0%1 15,.2%1 13.6%1 13.9% 10.6%1 11.4%1 33.21 1 34.,6 Sources: U.S.Census Bureau,2010 Census;American Community Survey,2013-2017. "01' A 21 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 252 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Figure 1: San Diego County Age Structure (2017) Age Cate ory 18.0% 16.3% 16.0% 14.5% 14.0% 13.2% 12.9% 12.9% 12.1'Vo 12.0% 10.0% 6.5(Vo 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% <5 5 to 14 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Source:American Community Survey,2013-2017. 3. Racial and Ethnicity The San Diego region's racial and ethnic composition trends mirror those seen at the national level. The nation's demographic profiles are becoming increasingly diverse in their racial and ethnic compositions. According to 2018 American Community Survey estimates, 40 percent of U.S. residents were non-White. Growing Hispanic and Asian populations have contributed to a major transformation, reducing the number of White majority places and increasing the number of minority-majority and no-majority places. As of 2010, the most diverse communities in the U.S. were disproportionately western, southern, and coastal metropolitan areas and their principal cities, and suburbs. Studies have found that areas with a strong government and/or the military employment base, as is the case in the San Diego region, tend to be more diverse in general.' Race and ethnicity have implications on housing choice in that certain demographic and economic variables correlate with race. For example, median household income in the county between 2013 and 2017 was $70,588. However,the median income for Black, Hispanic American Indian, and Alaska Native households was, less than 75 percent of the county median while Asian and White household median incomes were 125 and 114 percent of the county median income. The State of California's and San Diego County's demographic profiles have become increasingly diverse in their race and ethnic compositions since 1970, a period that coincides with the sharp increase in immigration. As recently as 1970, the vast proportion of the population in the State was predominantly White whereas now, non-White races (classified as minorities) are the majority in California. When a population's racial and ethnic composition is more than 50 percent non-White, the population is said to have a minority-majority. The County of San Diego became a minority-majority area between 2000 and Lee, Barrett and Iceland, A.John and Sharp, Gregory. "Racial and Ethnic Diversity Goes Local: Charting Change in An Communities Over Three Decades" Project US2010, (2012). "01, A 22 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 253 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'Ai' 2010, when the percent minority population increased from 45.1 to 51.5 percent. The proportion of minority population continued to increase between 2010 and 2017 to 53.8 percent. Table 10: Racial and Ethnic Composition Asian/ Percent Percent jurisdiction White Black Hispanic P. 1s1. Other Minority* Minority* 2010 2017 Urban County Coronado 75.10/() 3.50/() 14.50/() 3.5% 3.4% 20.6% 24.91% Del Mar 91.30/() 0.50/() 4.71Y01 2.6% 1.0% 9.3% 8.7% Imperial Beach 31.4% 4.0'Yo 51.3% 8.6% 4.8% 64.0% 68.6% Lemon Grove 31.9% 12.7% 44.4% 6.1% 4.8% 65.3% 68.1% Poway 63.7'Yo 0.9%) 18.5% 12.9% 4.0% 30.9% 36.3% Solana Beach 78.4'Yo 0.4% 11.5% 5.1 IVO 4.6% 22.7% 21.6% Unincorporated 58.6% 4.20/() 26.9% 5.9% 4.3% 38.6% 41.4% Total Urban 58.0% 4.20/() 27.1% 6.4% 4.3% 39.1% 42.0% County Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 74% 0.90/() 14% 7.8% 3.4% 25% 26% Chula Vista 18% 4.20/() 60% 150/() 1.0% 80% 82% El Cajon 56% 5.40/() 29% 4.1% 4.8% 43% 44% Encinitas 79% 0.6% 13% 4.2% 4.8% 21' o 21% Escondido 37% 2.1(Yo 51(Yo 7.0% 4.0% 6 Vo 63% La Mesa 56% 6.6% 26% 6.2% 4.6% 38% 44% National City 10% 4.5% 64% 20% 4.3% 88/0 90(yo Oceanside 48% 4.9% 35% 7.9% 4.3% 52% 52% San Diego 43% 6.1% 30% 17% 3.4% 55% 57% San Marcos 45% 2.5% 39% 10% 1.0% 51% 55% Santee 70% 1.9% 18% 4.8% 4.8% 26% 30% Vista 40% 2.8% 50% 4.8% 4.8% 59/0 60% Total County 46% 4.7% 33% 12% 4.0% 52% 54% Total State 38% 5.5% 39% 14% 4.6% 60/0 62% Sources U.S.Census Bureau,2010.American Community Survey.2013-2017. Minority is defined as Blacks,Hispanics,Asian/Pacific Islanders,and all others not White. 'Z M�'Yf U [1 N, ?I? i"1, 1; Q'i ly"'r 1,�'i'? 23 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 254 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ After White residents,the largest racial ethnic group in the county is Hispanic.As seen in Table 10,White residents make up the single largest percentage of San Diego County residents (46.2 percent), while Hispanic residents made up 33.4 percent. Asians/Pacific Islander,Blacks,and other groups followed with 11.9 percent,4.7 percent,and 3.9 percent,respectively (Table 10). The cities of National City,Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, Escondido, and Vista have significant Hispanic concentrations (greater than 50 percent), while the city of Del Mar has the smallest proportion of Hispanic residents (4.7 percent). The largest concentrations of Asian/Pacific Islander populations reside in National City, San Diego, and Chula Vista. The City of Lemon Grove has the highest concentration of Black residents (1, percent) while the second highest concentration of Blacks was in La Mesa (7 percent). Del Mar,Poway, Solana Beach, Carlsbad and Encinitas have the smallest proportions of Black residents, where Blacks make up less than one percent of their population. .Racue an d Ethnic Con cue n tra tioll Ethnic and racial composition of a region is useful in analyzing housing demand and any related fair housing concerns, as it tends to demonstrate a relationship with other characteristics such as household size,locational preferences and mobility.Nationally,HUD data show that race-based discrimination ranks second in discrimination of protected classes, behind discrimination related to disability'. Figure 2 illustrates concentrations of minority households by Census block group in San Diego County. A concentration is defined as a block group with a proportion of minority households that is greater than the overall San Diego County minority average of 50.8 percent? . An important note on the mapping of racial/ethnic concentrations is that concentration is defined by the proportion of a racial/ethnic group in the total population of a census block group. If a census block group has low population, such as in and near the State and National Parks (eastern portions of the map), the proportion of a racial ethnic group may appear high even though the number of residents inthat group may be limited. Furthermore, block group boundaries may cross jurisdictional boundaries The minority population in the county is described by sub-region in Table 11. In San Diego County, the minority population is, concentrated in the southern areas of the City of San Diego and continuing south (Figure 2). This pattern can be attributed to the traditional cluster of minorities living in the urban core and near the U.S./Mexican border. Another concentration is visible in the northwestern part of the North County East sub-region just west of the Cleveland National Forest. This area is home to several Native American reservations. An additional swath of minority concentration can be found in the University and Mira Mesa communities of the City of San Diego. Clusters of minority populations are also found in the North County cities of Oceanside,Vista, San Marcos, and Escondido. 6 1 -4 U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development. "Annual Report on Fair Housing FY 2017", (2017). 7 This minority percentage differs from the 5,4 percent in Table 3 due to calculation differences in the unit of measurement. This value was calculated using the census block groups and block group boundaries may cross,jurisdictional boundaries. "01, A 24 2020-06-23 Agenda Parke lt Page 255 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR F11(")UJ SUl',,,�('; Table 11: Minority Population by Sub-region MSA Region Minority Population Total Population %M inority in Region 2010 2018 2010 20108 2010 2018 0 Central 414,065 437,635 630.)376 679)213 65.70yo 64.4% 1 North City 296)118 371)440 733)866 812,706 40.4% 45.7% 2 South Suburban 312)045 335)810 385)468 407,514 81.C1% 82.4% 3 East Suburban 187)436 229)518 481)993 5091452 38.9% 45.1% 4 North County West 149)733 174)472 405)715 4401048 36.9% 39.6% 5 North County East 2261139 2501322 431.)208 458)801 52.4% 54.6% 6 East County 9.173( 9.1858 26,687 26,722 36.5% 36.9% Total 1)595)266 1)809)055 3)0951313 31334)456. 51.50yo 54.3% Sources: U.S.Census Bureau,2010 Census;SANDAG,Series'14(2018). A significant portion of San Diego County's papulation is also foreign born. According to the 2013-2017 ACS, one-fourth of the county's population is foreign born and almost 90 percent of them are from non- European countries. About half of foreign-born residents in the county are from Latin America and a large portion of immigrants are from Asian countries (38 percent). More than a third of the foreign-born Asian population came from the Philippines, a Southeast Asian country. �u iii.� °���:�ui� "01, A 25 2020-06-23 Agenda Parke lt Page 256 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FT`S']1'(,)f F'AlR H1(")UJ Figure 2: Minority Concentration Areas 7,� IF 0 Me z F JAP" j/ 00", I/I aI �1,.. / j Ji/� m m -.?a /pp, o� dfi11" r T "o /IV e -fp 0 0% �W Mr, v g rg/,� f um '11, y� V 4/f/ A //,,,% o�,01 f J01 % - 11 0,/ .ri i, a,,r//,//ii/.. !� � ,r: ;,, „�;, :..1, ' r b�.,.... , v1p �A �//pw 1/00011 N* A 0, j////ggYff11 MWm jpr wr m/ 4 'd i A."i 01/dp P-,,_ /A, J, 05 0% iiiIS," fg, % 4/1111? 411111 4/5 Ix/I 0-111,0 W a/ 11"If W//I"allm r ? Ile 0#11/0 J J Am Iry k All, J OPP, A/0, I........... F A NY/lul 70/a, cIffs""'Ir,f"'T —01 v, 761 0/ft f0l Adf/l J # 'T j0d% '4x/,/ /o/ 'T ! P 01-1 qOansideA, � pror j J, JAI 00 w err I 1,,w liA 10", All it A/dW VISA'a Occairtst, jb-,ri(f 11 o j"re, Z", Q 0`1 v ? 01 Azl "a J/1 0 u i 110 0, A 4/ A ,Z I au,jm V 11 W, fif//40" 00 do 100/cm scondiii A 78 S nwarcos f� /00 /0"AAF, ,C.Arlsba'd 11 Id �54 ""'k W A 6 WWI IT' /0 J, //4 JJ x""I yx, q 4" A/00 78f —,yf,v 'E.Acin"tas , -U u ai "k '41.LiEV" "S 6� ",Sblana V, way.,., - 0, 44/0/01 A x ,�+p„ rl/ rr (,r/ rvd �� .,/1' �/ iii' /iw D I T-1, M /g/o/d/l/ W/ r H p Ir "p—OF V f w /gO r �Jr F7, p r J 1 0 Owe i. OX 1111111fo"A Y % I jolly Alf Md L 's"i WA Sante 'd 5/0, ................. A/ 0019-VII 5an, ,,.jD tego, 01 Off/ Al AfGlft c,,i i Ir 4 ji Add/! J, �V' J P", 1 5 �'Ell Uajo X/,Am 1 4, f, le"rm! J, Al A-1 La� APO W, ow o/ d I/ 0, mes'a jg,g, pr a Fllml w"A A/001, Alumvm/ 0 f fill 'rT e m m, '1%V, A V` "") , 11 11'� A/ff e/,�� G"m e ------------------------- 4, 14 if Minority Concentration Areas,," A j 1, if f"NO11 N A, J/1 0 1'a g,gpdzqmil�ll Counly,Boundary ........... r p��/v 3 A iona j ly, 01" Ci�ty Boundaries N Oa I C Gommiundy Bounidarles� 10 I'S ),pf-kgj i of p w4h fl,()R� f I q, uqjr4,in w I Rx Rify p up 04jlov 11 C o ron a i,[ hPi -1,U I d"I a'V i s ta' J, t Ri jP4 4 L 0 1.25 2.5 51 peria: iIJ 04 R015 111 Jlf P,/"�// J, A13141 ""'.............................. Of Beath 10� A/ k nRA.W r'A 11 1;15 N ourcies",Esr"LU.SGS,NOA," .''Sources,Esri, ✓rril�si t 1111 thl V1 a 26 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 257 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Lineuis tic Isolation A language barrier can be an impediment to accessing housing of choice. A population that is both minority and does not speak English well may face discrimination based on national origin as well as challenges related to obtaining housing, such as communicating effectively with a property owner, landlord, rental agent, real estate agent, mortgage lender or insurance agent. According to the 2013-2017 ACS, approximately 3,7.7 percent of county residents over the age of five spoke a language other than "English only" at home. In some cities with a large minority population, such as the cities of Imperial Beach, Lemon Grove, Chula Vista, El Cajon, Escondido, National City, San Diego, San Marcos, and Vista this figure was higher. In National City, 70.3 percent of the population over the age of five years spoke a language other than English at home. Table 12: Language and Linguistic Isolation Speak Language Other Speak English Total Than E gfish at Home Less than"Very Well" jurisdiction Population %Total %of Speaking %Total Total Population Total Non-English Population Language Urban County Coronado 22)878 3)311 14.5% 848 25.6% 3.7'Y(,.) Del Mar 4)264 333 7.8% 60, 18.0% 1.4'Y(,.) Imperial Beach 25,500 12)550 49.2% 4)187 33.4% 16.4% Lemon Grove 24X8 10)194 40.8% 3)357 32.9% 13.4% Poway 46,715 12)149 26.0% 5)180 42.6% 11.1 Ivo Solana Beach 12.1847 1.1847 14.4% 707 38.3✓0 5.5(Vo Unincorporated 473)988 1191)992 25.30/o 431)890 36.6% 9.3% Total Urban 611)160 160y 376 26.20/o 581)229 36.3% 9.5% County Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 106)371 181)183 17.10/o 7,025 38.6% 6.6% Chula Vista 246)395 1461)846 59.60/o 551)768 38.0% 22.6% El Cajon 95)405 411)750 43.80/o 201)103 48.2% 21.1% Encinitas 59.1177 9.1405 15.9% 3)678 39.1✓0 6.2(Vo Escondido 138.1640 67.1537 48.7% 31)749 47.0✓0 22.9' 0 La Mesa 55.1440 13.1332 24.0% 4)324 32.4✓0 7.8(Vo National City 56.1914 40.1019 70.3% 15)9 91 40.0✓0 28.1`✓/o Oceanside 163,706 511440 31.4% 23,118 44.9% 14.1% San Diego 1,303,777 529,264 40.6% 214,379 40.5% 16.4% San Marcos 87,085 321716 37.6% 17,263 52.8% 19.8% Santee .531894 8,447 15.7% 21661 31.5% 4.9% Vista 92,799 37)659 40.6(Vo 17,757 47.2% 19.1% Total County 31070,763 1J561974 37.7% 472,0145 40.8,% 15.4% Source:American CommunitySurvey,2013-2017. "01, A 27 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 258 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; Linguistically isolated household can be described as a household whose members, have at least some difficulty speaking English. The ACS provides information on households with persons five years and over who speak English "less than very well." In San Diego County, 15.4 percent of residents indicated that they spoke English "less than very well" and can be considered linguistically isolated. Of those that speak a language other than English at home,40.8 percent speak English less than very well. The cities of National City, Escondido, and Chula Vista have the highest percentage of total residents who spoke English less than "very well (28.1, 22.9 and 22.6 percent of the total population, respectively). Language barriers may prevent residents from accessing services,information,and housing,and may affect educational attainment and employment. Executive Order 13166 ("'Improving Access to Services by Persons with Limited English Proficiency") was issued in August 2000,which requires federal agencies to assess and address the needs of otherwise eligible persons seeking access to federally conducted programs and activities who, due to Limited English Proficiency (LES"), cannot fully and equally participate in or benefit from those programs and activities. This requirement passes down to grantees of federal funds as well. Oxx I.Cs S h, o'''It"i ehold, C Household type and size, income level, the presence of persons with special needs, and other household characteristics may affect access to housing. This section details the various household characteristics that may affect equal access to housing. A household is defined by the Census as all persons occupying a housing unit. Families are a subset of households and include all persons living together who are related by blood,marriage or adoption. Single households include persons living alone but do not include persons in group quarters such as convalescent homes or dormitories. "Other"households are unrelated people living together,such as roommates. L Household Composition anct mze According to the 2019 California Department of Finance Housing estimates, there are 1,219,460 households in San Diego County, a 12.2-percent increase since 2010. The cities of San Marcos, Carlsbad, and Chula Vista saw the largest increases in the number of households between 2000 and 2010. However, in the last decade, the cities of Coronado and Del Mar had the greatest increases in the number of households (31.5 percent and 27.2 percent) while San Marcos, Carlsbad, and Chula Vista had moderate household growth (18.1, 13.91, and 13.3 percent)- None of the cities saw a decrease in household numbers. Different household types generally have different housing needs. Seniors or young adults typically constitute a majority of single-person households and tend to reside in apartment units, condominiums or smaller detached homes. Families, meanwhile, often prefer single-family homes. Household size can be an indicator of changes in population or use of housing. An increase in household size can indicate a greater number of large families or a trend toward overcrowded housing units. A decrease in household size, on the other hand,may reflect a greater number of senior or single-person households, or a decrease in family size. "01, A 28 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 259 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Table 13: Household Growth by jurlsdlctlon Households Household Growth jurisdiction 2010 2019 2010-2019, Urban County Coronado 71409 9,740 31.5% Del Mar 21064 2,625 27.2% Imperial.Beach 9,112 1074 10.6% Lemon Grove 8,454 9,114 8.1% Poway 16)128 16,917 4.90/o Solana Beach 51650 6,569 16.3% Unincorporated 159,339 178,844 12.2% Total Urban County 208P6 255,883 12.4% Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 41)1345 47)080 13.9�% Chula Vista 75)1515 85)535 13.3% El Cajon 34)11 34 36J48 5.9�% Encinitas 24)1082 26')495 10.0% Escondido 45)1484 48)833 7.4% La Mesa 24)1512 26')86'9 9.6% National City 15)1502 17)26'4 11.4% Oceanside 59)1238 65)902 11.2% San Diego 483M92 545)645 12.9'% an.:Marcos 27,1202 52,126 18.1% Santee 19,1306, 211100 9.3% Vista 29,1317 32,3580 11.1% Total County 1)0,86)865= 1,219,460 12.2% Sources U.S.Census Bureau,2010;California Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates(E-5),2019. The ma)ority of San Diego County households are family households, with a roughly even mix between married-couple households with and without children (Table 14). Families with children account for 33.5 percent of all households in the county. "Other" families, primarily consisting of single-parent households,, represent 17.2 percent of all households. Households of single senior persons make up 8.7 percent of all households,. Between 2010 and 2013-2017, the distribution of household types remained relatively stable. More than 67 percent of all households within the County of San Diego are family households.Nationally, HUD data show that familial status discrimination ranks third in discrimination of protected classes, behind, discrimination due to disability and, race.' While the language in federal law about familial status discrimination is clear,the guidelines landlords can use to establish occupancy can be very vague.Although 8 1 -4 U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development. "Annual Report on Fair Housing FY 2017". (2017). f. �ISL� "�"�M'��Il ' "01, A 29 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 260 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 1'7A1R 11(")IJ landlords can create occupancy guidelines based on the physical limitations of the housing unit,landlords often impose strict occupancy limitations precluding large families with children. Table 14: Household Type 2010 2017 Household Type Number of Percent of Number of Percent of Households Households Households Households Family Households 720)480 66.3% 747.)245 67.2% Married with Children' 26,3,046 24.2% 2591963 23.4% Married—no Children 26,8, 79 24.7% 2961702.45 26.7% Other Family with Children 113,072 10.4% 112,172 1(x.1% Other Family—no Children 75)1483 6.9% 78)408 7.1'Y(,.) Non-Family Households 366)385 33.7% 364.1494 32.8()/o Sin )o gje,non-senior 174593 16.1(Vo 169854 15-31/ Singje,senior 86)6248.0(V() 96)591 8.7% Total County 110 6,865 100.0% 1)111)739 100.0% Source:U.S. Census Bureau,2010 Census;American Community Survey,20,13-2017. 1 With children categories calculated using the HH With one or more persons Linder 18 Certain jurisdictions in the county had a higher than average proportion of family households with children and,therefore, may be more vulnerable to this type of discrimination.The proportion of families with dependent children was highest in the City of Chula Vista (39.9 percent) and Poway (37.7 percent). The proportion of families with children in the unincorporated areas (31.5 percent) is similar to the county-wide proportion (30..2 percent). Close to nine percent of households in the county included senior members and six percent of households were female-headed households with children. Single-parent households with children and households headed by seniors have unique fair housing issues as discussed later in this chapter. "01, A 30 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 261 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 1'7A1R Table 15: Household Characteristics % Female- urisdiction % Families %Elderly Had J Families with Households Households Children w/ Children Urban County Coronado 6 .1 O/o 27.0% 12.8% 4.0% Del Mar 58.2% 13.4% 8.6% 0.9% Imperial Beach 68.7% 32.0% 6.6% 10.60/() Lemon Grove 70.4% 33.9% 9.9% 7.0% Poway 80.5% 37.7% 7.5% 4.6% Solana Beach 55.4% 20.3% 16.1% 2.1% Unincorporated 76.2% 31.5% 9.1 IVO 2.7% Total Urban County 75.9% 31.9% 9.4% 3.4% Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 70.80/() 31.70/() 9.6% 5.60/(.) Chula Vista 79.00/() 39.90/() 7.0% 8.6Y(,) ]',.I Cajon 72.00/() 35.80/() 8.3% 20.7% Encinitas 64.2% 27.7% 11.8 IV() 3.6% Escondido 72.7% 36.0% 8.9 IV() 7.6% La Mesa 58.4% 24.5% 13.0% 6.5% National City 74.3% 34.9% 9.5% 11.81yo Oceanside 67.50/() 26.60/() 11.00/() 5.2'Y(,) San Diego 60.4% 27.0% 8.0% 5.7% San Marcos 73.9% 37.2% 9.4% 5.7% Santee 73.4% 32.8% 9.7% 6.4% Vista 70.9`/'0 34.31//0 7.3% 7.2"Vo Total County 67.2% 30.2% 8.7% 6.0% Source:American Community Survey,2013-2017. Household Size The average size and composition of households are highly sensitive to the age structure of the population but they also reflect social and economic changes. For example, economic downturns may prolong the time adult children live at home or result in multiple families and non-family members living together to lower housing costs. The average household size countywide in 2017 was 2.87 persons per household, a very slight increase from 2010 (2.°75). Average household size ranged from a low of 2.01 persons in Del Mar to a high of 3.47 in National City. Geographically, average household size increased in the Southern and, Eastern areas of the county. Nine cities had an average household size over three persons in 2017, compared to only five in 2019. Notably, no cities in the Urban County had with an average household size over three persons in the 2010 but by 2017, average household size was greater than 3.0 in Imperial Beach, Lemon Grove, and Poway. ? Q" "d" A 31 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 262 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 11(")IJ Table 16: Average Household Size by jurisdiction Average Household Si: jurisdictione 2010 2017 Urban County Coronado 2.3,1 2.40 Del Mar 2.02 2.01 Imperial Beach 2.82 3.02 Lemon Grove 2.96 3.12 Poway 2.93 3.12 Solana Beach 2.28 2.33 Unincorporated -- -- Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 2.53 2.60 ('-'.hula Vista 3.21 3.34 El Cajon 2.84 3.09 Encinitas 2.45 2.56 Escondido 3.12 3.29 La Mesa 2.3 2.49 National City 3.41 3.47 Oceanside 2.8 2.81 San Diego 2.6 2.72 San Marcos 3.05 3.17 Santee 2.72 2.86 Vista 3.13 3.19 Total County 2.75 2.87 Sources: U.S.Census Bureau,2010 Census;American Community Survey, 2013-2017. `2 M I''Yf 1. 11 N'° ?I? i"1, 1; 32 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 263 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ (1 0.0 Special Needs G` rotips Certain households and residents,because of their special characteristics and needs,have greater difficulty finding decent and affordable housing. These circumstances may be related to age, family characteristics, or disability. Table 17 shows a summary of this section and the special needs groups present in San Diego County. The following discussion highlights particular characteristics that may affect access to housing in a community. Table 17: Residents wl*th Special Needs Special Needs Group Number Percent of County Households with a Senior(6,5+) 2425017 21.8% Senior Persons (65+) 425)21'7 12.9% 1.,arge Households 129 627 11.7% C, Female Headed Households /Children 80)886 7.3% Disabled Persons 312)565 9.8% HIV/AIDS 13)643 0.4% Homeless Persons (Urban and Rural) 8)102 0.2% Farm Workers 8)308 0.3% .Active Duty Military Personnel 143)000 4% Veterans 225)694 7% ..j ...j Sources:American Community Survey 2013-2017; an Diego Regional,Task Force on the Homeless,Annual Report on the Homeless 2019;San Diego Military Advisory Council,San Diego Military Economic Impact Study,2019;County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency,HIV Epidemiology Report,2016. Seniors Seniors (persons age 65 and above), are gradually becoming a more substantial segment of a community's population. Americans are living longer than ever before in our history and are expected to continue to do so. Senior households are vulnerable to housing problems and housing discrimination due to limited income, prevalence of physical or mental disabilities,limited mobility, and high health care costs. Seniors, particularly those with disabilities, may face increased difficulty in finding housing accommodations and may become victims of housing discrimination or fraud. Seniors sometimes face discrimination in the rental housing market, often based on the perception of increased risks and liabilities associated with the frail conditions or disabilities of senior tenants.A senior on a fixed income can face great difficulty finding safe and affordable housing. Subsidized housing and federal housing assistance programs are increasingly challenging to secure and often involve a long waiting list. According to the 2013-2 17 ACS, 12.9 percent of all residents in San Diego County were ages 65 and over. The proportion of residents over the age of 65 years ranged from a low of 9.7 percent in Vista to a high of 25,.6 percent in Del Mar(Table 9).ACS data(2013-2017) estimates that 21.8 percent of households, in San Diego County had at least one individual who was, 65 years of age or older (Table 18). According to HUD's 2012-2016 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, a higher proportion (53.0 percent) of seniors had low and moderate incomes compared to all county residents (45.6 percent). 01, A 33 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 264 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Table 18: Senior Profile—San Diego County Percent Households Percent Households Percent of Percent With a 0 Residents Population Disability Vnth Low/Moderate with Housing Incomes Problems Seniors 12.9% 33.7% 53.01)/o 40.5% All Residents 100.00/() 9.51Yo 45.60/() 45.4% Sources:2013-2017 American Community Survey(ACS);I IUD Comprehensive I lousing.Affordability Strategy(CI-1-AS),2012-2016. The San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency's Aging & Independence Services "AIS) provides services to older adults, people with disabilities and their family members. AIS provides a wide range of services,including information and access,advocacy,coordination,assessment,and authorization of direct services. Direct services are provided through contracts with vendors and agencies, and include in-home support, respite care,meals (senior dining centers and home-delivered),health promotions,legal assistance, adult day care, transportation, educational opportunities, employment, money management, and counseling programs. The City and the County of San Diego both administer a wide array of housing programs to assist in the provision of affordable housing for senior households,including funding for acquisition and construction, rehabilitation, rental assistance, and home repair. In addition to affordable housing located near transportation, the housing needs of seniors include supportive housing, such as intermediate care facilities, group homes, and other housing with a planned service component. Approximately 593 State licensed residential care facilities for the elderly, 401 adult residential facilities (fear individuals ages 18 through 59) and 60 adult day care facilities (for individuals 18 and over) serve the senior population throughout the county. These licensed care facilities have a combined capacity of 28,131 beds. These numbers show a decrease from the number of licensed care facilities and bed capacity between 2014 and 2019. Between 2014 and 2015, the total bed capacity of licensed care facilities decreased by 3,716 from 31,847 to 28,131. The total number of facilities also dropped 700 from 1,855 to 1,155. Figure 3 shows the location of the various licensed care facilities in San Diego County as of 2019. Most of the community care facilities within the county are located within the larger incorporated cities. There is a noticeable presence of facilities in the unincorporated areas, specifically those surrounding the incorporated cities. However, since most of the county's population is located within the incorporated cities, residents living in these areas may have to travel a greater distance to access the region's inventory of care facilities. Concentrations of care facilities can be seen in the North County areas in and around the cities of Vista and Escondido and in the South County in and around the cities of Chula Vista and El Cajon. In the City of San Diego clusters, of care facilities can be seen in the southern portion of the City and in the Mira Mesa area. "01, A 34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 265 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR F11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; Figure 3: Licensed :are Facilities 104i 41 All t 4,t"t 14,tf U 0 A, Af.4,R' P dii,L Ck 'v o Lil vo VA" 4,4 4mv ORI 14''1 '11,01 ia�Ii I j a4r' u,loina in e, Af 4, U Ah A vauvii�,%, 4F, P A I A 11 Z %t,ry m"111414"" -�o m F anside C.: W, W5 Al F"t v 4 av, 1,4 Ili I c 4� asy Ll,0 V E !did in is ta, �eij x %.oarlsbad 0/ San F 8111f "v,,,'J 4061 .......... E din itas I n r il 111 0 m A 401 Solan Poway Meach 1 4� d1l,I`/� plix of,arij cil"N' - I ") D 0,�A Bio I it d i�a 11 0" 00 Mar'v qp 4/0 0/0 N%A 4 "San,, iego �D i�" 52 antee" "o EVOb ai V A-V Ati 1011 V,or, 00 Le m-o n�,G��ro el ei[0 7 0, g�, Liciensed Care,Facilities PA a, I -'pr Residentad Care for the ElIdefly A "Natiol, A Adult Residential FaclIffies C Adult Day Program o C unity Boundaries 11mm Corona,d/110 AA k City Boundaries County Boundary IDI, I u!I a IJ N' 511 115 Vista�- �JV 2,5 5 4 r Miles limperial Al, 901 Al DRAWTAP Bea-ch, J 11191/ ";S�i USGS NOAA C&OU"Irce"s'�'Es',ri,Garmin,USGS,NPS IN US I .,.��i ! I,f, " --�- ,-_7 ,,, Sources', 7, JIF f) �Oqe I �CL�, 35 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 266 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 1'11("')UJ 2, Lar9"e I ou ehold.s Large households are defined as those with five or more members. These households are usually families with two or more children or families with extended family members such as in-laws or grandparents. It can also include multiple families living in one housing unit in order to save on housing costs. Large households are a special needs group because the availability of adequately sized (i.e. three or more bedrooms), affordable housing units is often limited. Large households may face discrimination in the housing market,particularly for rental housing.Although landlords can create occupancy guidelines based on the physical limitations of the housing unit, landlords may impose strict occupancy limitations precluding large families with children. As indicated in Table 19 in 2017 close to 12 percent of all households in the county had five or more members; specifically 10.9 percent of owner-huseholds and 12.5 percent of renter-households in the county were large households. This represents a decrease of two percentage points in the proportion of large households in the county between 2010 and 2017 from 13.7 to 11.7 percent.The proportion of large households was highest in the cities of National City (19.0 percent), Escondido (18.6 percent), and Chula Vista (18.0 percent), although their respective proportions in 2,01 0 were much higher at, 25.4m 2,0.7, and 20.5 percent. These three cities also had high proportions of non-White population 0.3, 63.5, and 82.3 percent, respectively) and family households (74.3. 72.7, and 79.0 percent, respectively) in 2017. Many ethnic minority groups have a younger age profile and tend to have larger families than the White population. The 2012-2016 CHAS data shows that over half (51.3 percent) of large households were estimated to earn low and moderate incomes compared with 45.6 percent of all county households. "01' A 36 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 267 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'Ai' Table 19: Large Households Total Large Large Owner Large Renter Cit Area Households Households Households %of Total It %of Owner %of Renter Households Households Households Urban County Coronado 484 5.7'Yo 137 3.3% 347 8.1% Del Mar 40 1.91, E 40 3.5% 0 0.0% Imperial Beach 1)291 14.60/() 352 12.5% 939 15.6% Lemon Grove 1)285 15.30/() 832 18.3% 453 11.7% Poway 2.1121 13.50" 1,435 12.2% 686 17.0% Solana Beach 197 3.40./`+ 177 5.3% 20 0.8% Unincorporated 20)11() 12.5% 12)726 11.7% 71384 14.2()//0 Total Urban County 25)528 12.2% 15)699 11.5% 9,829 13.4% Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 2)924 6.8% 1,921 6.80, E 103 6.6'Y(,.) Chula Vista 14)116 18.0% 8,421 18.50/() 505 17.30x'0 .A Cajon 5)243 16.1% 1,555 10.90/() 5,888 19.30x'0 Encinitas 1.1347 5.50.0 876 5.7% 471 5.4% Escondido 8.1414 18.6% 31305 14.7% 5,109 22.5()/0 La Mesa 1.1588 6.7(Yo 680 6.9% 908 6.6'Yo National City 3.1073 19.0% 11183 22.7% 11890 17.2% Oceanside 6)883 11.1% 3,252 9.40, E 3,631 13.3% San Diego 491)569 10.00/o 221)901 9.8% 261)668 10.1% San Marcos 41192 14.40/o 11)998 11.2% 21)194 19.4% Santee 1,916 9.8% 11)1 64 8.7% 752 12.5% Vista 4.1834 15.8% 1,654 11.0% 3,180 20.5✓0 Total County 129,627L 11.7% j 64A09 j 10.91% 65)218 j 12.5% Source:American Community SunTey,2013-2017. 3. Families, with Children and Single-Parent Families Families with children may face housing discrimination by landlords who fear that children will cause property damage. Some landlords may have cultural biases against children of the opposite sex sharing a bedroom. Differential treatments such as limiting the number of children in a complex or confining children to a specific location are also fair housing concerns. For example, some landlords may charge large households a higher rent or security deposit, limit the number of children in a complex, confine them to a specific location, limit the time children can play outdoors, or choose not to rent to families with children altogether, which would violate fair housing laws. Housing discrimination against families with children can also be masked as overcrowding issues. Even when housing providers rent openly to families with children, there can still be an issue of illegal discriminatory policies for families once they become tenants. Neutral rules are expected to apply to all tenants equally, but once a housing provider isolates a particular group upon which to singularly implement those rules, a discriminatory practice is set in motion. "01' A 37 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 268 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; The proportion of families with dependent children was highest in the cities of Chula Vista and National City (Table 15). These communities may be more vulnerable to familial discrimination in the housing market because of their higher than average proportion of families with children. The proportion of female-headed households decreased between 2010 and 2017 from 7.5 to 6.0 percent (Table 15). The proportion of female-headed households with children was highest in El Cajon (20.7 percent) and National City (11.8 percent). Female single-parent family households are disproportionately affected by poverty. According to the 2013-2017 ACS, about 32.6 percent of female single-parent family households in San Diego County lived below the poverty level (compared to 9.5 percent of all family households in the county). Limited household income constrains the ability of these households to afford adequate housing and childcare, health care, and other necessities. Finding adequate and affordable childcare is also a pressing issue for many families with children and single-parent households in particular. 4. Persons with Disabilities Affordability,design,location,and discrimination limit the supply of housing for persons with disabilities. Fair housing choice for persons with disabilities may be compromised based on the nature of their disability. Adaptable housing is the most critical housing need for persons with mobility limitations. Many single-family homes may not be adaptable to widened doorways and hallways, access ramps, or other features necessary for accessibility.Furthermore,multi-family units built prior to 1990 are often not wheel- chair accessible and the cost of retrofitting a home is often prohibitive. Many disabled individuals live in households where a member of the household is a homeowner. These disabled individuals are less likely to have accessible units, since the Fair Housing Act (FLEA) does not apply to all owner-occupied dwelling units. Amendments to the Fair Housing Act,as well as state law,require ground-floor units of new multi- family construction with more than four units to be accessible to persons with disabilities. However,units built prior to 1989 are not required to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Older units, particularly in older multi-family structures, are very expensive to retrofit for disabled occupants because space is rarely available for elevator shafts, ramps, widened doorways, etc. The site, parking areas, and walkways may also need modifications to install ramps and widen walkways and gates. The location of housing and availability of transportation is also important because disabled people may require access to a variety of social and specialized services. Persons with physical disabilities may face discrimination in the housing market because of the use of wheelchairs, need for home modifications to improve accessibility, or other forms of assistance. Persons with disabilities may request reasonable accommodations or reasonable modifications from their landlords. A reasonable accommodation is a change, exception or adjustment to a rule, policy,practice or service while a reasonable modification is a structural change made to the premises while. For example, a reasonable accommodation would include mal-cing an exception to an existing 'no pet' rule to permit a service dog. A reasonable modification could include installing a ramp for an individual who uses a wheelchair or grab bars in the bathroom. Landlords are required to make "reasonable accommodations" to rules and policies to accommodate a tenant's disability. According to a HUD-DOJ Statement, requests for reasonable accommodations can be denied when: "01, A 38 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 269 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ `...the request was not made by or on behalf of a person with a disability or if there is no disability related need for the accommodation. [And]... if it would impose an undue financial and administrative burden on the housing provider or it would fundamentally alter the nature of the provider's, operations,"`' In regard to reasonable modifications, landlords must allow a tenant with physical disabilities to make "reasonable modifications" to the unit in order to address accessibility issues. According to the HUD—JOJ Statement, "A person with a disability must have the housing provider's approval before making the modification. However, if the person with a disability meets the requirements under the Act for a reasonable modification and provides the relevant documents and assurances, the housing provider cannot deny the request."''(� In privately owned properties, the tenant is responsible for the costs of modifications. In government subsidized housing (Section 504, housing set up for those with disabilities, etc.), the housing provider typically pays for the modification unless it is an undue administrative or financial burden. While housing discrimination is not covered by the ADA, the Fair Housing Act prohibits housing discrimination against persons with disabilities. In their 2019 Fair Housing Trends Report, the National Fair Housing Alliance indicated that disability complaints were the most prevalent type of housing discrimination complaint (56.3 percent). The report stated that since complaints are usually based on denial of a request to make reasonable accommodations or modifications for people with disabilities, or because it involves a multi-family property that is not accessible in obvious ways that violate the Fair Housing Act., discrimination based on disability easier to detect. Discrimination against persons with disabilities also continues to be the largest category of complaints HUD receives each year (3"x.4 percent in 2017)." Federal laws define a person with a disability as "any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; has a record of such impairment; or is regarded as having such an impairment." In general, a physical or mental impairment includes hearing, mobility and visual impairments,,chronic alcoholism,chronic mental illness,AIDS,AIDS Related Complex,and mental retardation that substantially limits one or more major life activities. Major life activities include walking, talking,, hearing, seeing, breathing, learning,performing manual tasks, and caring for oneself 12 9 joint Statement of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Department of justice on Reasonable Accommodations Under the Fair Housing Act (2 04) -Question 7. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/201O/12/14/j(,)int—statement—ra,pdf 10 joint Statement of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Department of justice on Reasonable Modifications Under the Fair Housing Act (21(18)-Question, 16 https://www.hud.gov/sites/d(-)cuments/reasonable—modlfications—mar08,pdf 11 U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development,"Annual Report on Fair Housing FY 2017-2018".(2018). 12 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. "Disability Rights in Housing," (2014). http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src—/program offices/fair housingI I _,,--eq ual—opp/disabilities/inho using. Accessed December 23,2014, ? 39 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 270 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ The U.S. Census Bureau classifies disabilities into the following categories: • Hearing difficulty: Deaf or having serious difficulty hearing • Vision difficulty: Blind or having serious difficulty seeing, even when wearing glasses • Cognitive difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty remembering, concentrating, or making decisions • Ambulatory difficulty: Having serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs • elf-care difficulty: Having difficulty bathing or dressing • Independent living difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor's office or shopping According to 2013-2017 ACS data,312,565 persons living in San Diego County had a range of disabilities, comprising 9.8 percent of the population. The largest age group of persons with disabilities were seniors, comprising 45.9 percent of the population with disabilities, followed by adults (ages 18 to 64) which comprised 47.1 percent of the population. Children under the age of 18 made up about seven percent of the population with disabilities. (Table 20). The cities of El Cajon, La Mesa, and Lemon Grove had the highest proportion of residents with disabilities (1 3. , 12.6, and 11.9 percent). Figure 4 shows population density for persons with disabilities in San Diego County. Figure 4 shows that although disabled persons are geographically dispersed throughout the more urbanized areas of the county, there are significant areas with a high density of disabled residents that coincide with minority concentration areas and RECAPS (Racially Concentrated Areas of Poverty). Specifically, concentrations of disabled residents can be seen in the North County cities of Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, and Escondido,as,well as the southern areas of the City of San Diego and southern cities near the U. Mexico border. Due to the presence of residential care facilities, the City of San Diego and the cities of El Cajon, La Mesa, and Lemon Grove also have concentrations of residents with disabilities.The coastal and inland areas show less dense concentrations of residents with disabilities, which could be due to the high price of housing(ire.the coastal areas) or the scarcity of facilities and services for persons with disabilities (inland areas). Of those disabilities tallied between 2013 and 2017 (as shown in Table 21), cognitive, ambulatory, and independent living disabilities were the most prevalent. The senior population had a significantly larger percentage of all disability types. San Diego County's senior population will grow substantially in the next 20 years. Since seniors have a much higher probability of having a disability,the housing and service needs for persons with disabilities should grow considerably, commensurate with the projected growth of this population. As previously stated, there are approximately 593 State-licensed residential care facilities for the elderly, 401 adult residential facilities, and 6,0 adult day care facilities throughout the county. These licensed care facilities have a combined capacity of just over 28,000 beds. Persons with Developmental Disabilities:As defined by federal law,"developmental disability"means a severe, chronic disability of an individual that: "01, A 4,0 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 271 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ • Is attributable to a mental or physical impairment or combination of mental and physical impairments; • Is manifested before the individual attains age 22,"; • Is likely to continue indefinitely; • Results in substantial functional limitations in three or more of the following areas of major life activity: a) self-care;b) receptive and expressive language;c) learning;d) mobility;e) self-direction; capacity for independent living; or g) economic self- sufficiency; and • Reflects the individual's need for a combination and sequence of special, interdisciplinary, or generic services, individualized supports, or other forms of assistance that are of lifelong or extended duration and are individually planned and coordinated. According to the U.S. Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD), the percentage of the population that can be defined as developmentally disabled is approximately 1.5 percent.The Census does not specifically record developmental disabilities. However, using the ADD percentage to create an estimate,based on the 2019 Department of Finance population estimates, this equates to just over 50,000 persons in the County of San Diego. The San Diego Regional Center provides a range of services to persons with or affected by developmental disabilities. Services include diagnostic and eligibility assessments, program planning, case management, and other services and supports. The San Diego Regional Center has four offices in the county and is one of 21 non-profit regional centers in California providing lifelong services and support for people with developmental disabilities residing in San Diego and Imperial Counties. As of June 2018, the Regional Center had just over 27,000 clients living in San Diego County. The ARC of San Diego and Community Interface Services offer comprehensive services for persons or individuals with developmental disabilities and their families, including diagnosis, counseling, coordination of services, advocacy and community education/training. 13 The State of California defines developmental disabilities slightly differently than federal law. The main difference is at the manifestation age,where California established that threshold at age IS. "01, A 4,1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 272 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F1`S']1'('])F'AiR 11(")IJ Table 20: Disability by Age 0-5 Years 5-�17 Years 18-�64 Years 65+Years Total jurisdiction %of %of # % # % # 1% # % Disabled Total Population Population Urban County Coronado 0.0% 133 0.00/() 527 0.20/() 11075 0.30/() 11735 0.6% 9.1% Del Mar - 0.0% 33 0.00/() 137 0.00/() 175 0.10/0 345 0.1% 8.0% Imperial Beach 28 0.00/() 128 0.00/() 1�6�35 0.50/() 1�162 0.4% 2�953 0.91y(.) 11.2% Lemon Grove 11 0.00/() 245 0.10/6 1�524 0.50/() 1�540 0.5% 3X0 1.1 IYO 12.6% Poway 43 0.0% 403 0.1%) 1)989 0.6% 21488 0.8% 41923 1.6% W.0% Solana Beach - 0.0% 51 0.0%) 233 0.1%) 577 0.2% 861 0.3% 6.5% Unincorporated 136 0.0% 3)618 1.2% 25)375 8.1(Vo 24)934 8.0% 54)063 17.3% 11.4% Total Urban County 218 0.1(YO 4)611 1.5%) 31)420 10.1(YO 31)951 10.2% 68)200 21.8% 11.1% Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 44 0.00/() 493 0.20/() 3�528 1.10/6 4�998 1.6% V63 2.9'Y(,) 8.1% Chula Vista 40 0.00/() 1�706 0.50/() 10)1733 3.40/() 11�958 3.8% 24J37 7.8'y(,.) 9.4% El.Cajon 25 0.0% 1 1)009 0.3% 71)341 2.3% 51)076 1.6% 131)451 4.3% 13.3% Encinitas - 0.0% 390 0.1% 11)648 0.5% 31)324 1.1% 51)362 1.7% 8.6% Escondido 23 0.0% 1�206 0.4% 8�508, 2.7% 61031 1.9%) 15�768 5.0(Vo 10.50/0 La Mesa - 0.0% 541 0.2% 3�1 92 1.0% 31171 1.01%) 61904 2.2(Vo 11.90/0 National City 11 0.0% 339 0.1% 2�793 0.9% 31178 1.01%) 61321 2.0(Vo 11.3()/o Oceanside 72 0.0% 107 0.3% V12 2.9% 91146 2.9(Yo 19J37 6.2(Vo 11.3()/o San Diego 586 0.2% 81)186 2.6% 58,1738 18.8% 551)120 17.6% 1221)630 39�.2% 9.0% San Marcos - 0.0% 668 0.2% 31)039 1.0% 31)689 1.2% 71)396 2.4% 8.0% Santee 10 0.0% 321 0.1% 31)198 1.0% 21)676 0.9% 61)205 2.0% 11.2% Vista 9 0.0% 435 0.1% 33819 1.2% 31128 1.01% 71391 2.4% 7.6% Total County 1)038 0.3% 20�912 6.7% 147J69 47.1% 143�446 45.9% 312�5�65 100.0% 9.8% Source: American Community Survey,2013-2017. Q,i ly"'I"1,�,i'?x (",A) 4,2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 273 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR Table 21: Disability Characteristics Disability by Age and Type Under 18 to 64 �65 Years and '%of Population with Years Over Disability2 Hearing Difficulty 0-5'Yo 1.3% 14.8% 27.9% Vision Difficulty 0.6'Yo 1.2% 6.7% 17.5% Cognitive Difficulty 2.5'Yo 3.1% 10.7% 39�.6% Ambulatory Difficulty 0.5'Yo 3.2% 22.8% 51.1% Self-Care Difficulty 0.90/() 1.2% 9.4% 21.8% Independent Living Difficultyl 2.6% 18.1% 39.9Yo Total County 3.5�% 7.0% 35.9% Notes: 1:Tallied only f(--)r persons 18 years and over 2.Totals add up to more than 100 percent because person may have more than one type of disability. Source:American Community Survey(ACS),2013-2017. 'Z M�'Vf 1� I"I N/ I? i"1, 1; 4,3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 274 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FT`S"]1'(�)l F'AiR 11("AIJ SUl'',,�C; Figure 4: Persons with Disabilities rwr Ilk o/ -f1r, K J rer"�, /// ,/,"""' 00 X) A 7"1, AZ"', ir j A/A./ .......... /m/o/3 ff,actvd '10 mJj �J/ F x) 41 Aii % q 'row,. Ni, 0", v/ j af, /21 pw % N A W t T 154'1 'm 01 A 31 1 "A ,t g 0/0 �////....... A, /A A .................. x ,N P "'yr, 11F K e' v I 3 AI it ArP; f A'X/p _0 2 0 A aqm jP 4, W, JIF "l kee 'S, "N" /j/ "'r, r 70, 'lit W, Y/// sem A id A Of 0 xg, og I j 111/00/1111"0'// /K ggga//, w�04 'F �,5V 40C,")p F 00 AWIT mamm V 6, 1 4`1', 'A 'JUNI.Al/11,11 A/0 22111 a ry lo s m AW)l "'a `/....... /"/// , /W g� "Wom. J//1 -0yeansi NOW' 0/ p j elp j 6", Of 10 J L (&/p/m, /o/or w V[18ta, a qa, d/k/0" 71/ 400/ 0/0 1/c/ v mmmmmml�, �(W A All, /d IMF did:o,, ,//, 1/0 US' n a, V Carlsbad Mflflhk 1/0m, -11Ma A f Ad jib A X0 Al 0,, I /" ig, ................... 1/h 7. 11/1"Jor,A111 AS T>04 1,')4 J/00 Ad/9 rfvo 11", ",(/......../, ......./, p A I V, -'a N A, J// pp E n q i n i t a s A/A 1"I'M 1TV VN 914,11 17' i 1 h z� AtIlIllp Sam P4,41 kA V"ALL E Y A, %4 R, d I" Solan""Beach dr, k J, /g P a m/g/ g", �65Z,7, 5 P/ @'y q 111111F�U)111401 00/111, J, §0 X` 'I �A V d i Del`� ar jole -W 0 q// 0"s,e,r�v a it'Dill A f /A a Ir v Al i(1,xW P/1 / JAPP111` J, 41, 'A, 1 4 ai' g", W�k' j, N j A' 'aW,", 7 OR" (01" /o "e 0 momm", J/ '/00OFF", Am A g" an 9 107, '0 NO S .04:1 1.1 17 /g/p We �d "arm, I Of", -4101,1 et,�(,;, 7 If 1/6, "To r 41 d b i rita lei r A Ad/ 4, f/,W 0 "AN/lo K 1p", All N --,, / 49 1 Oki ,ki Oki RION, 0/01.1 -45 119 "Riffik ""I '1, /11 e 104 "'a 0/1 1/1 V /1 ft'13 f k ON, N Kj rN,, E 11111 C a q ex] W al A M a a "i , "I f /V D "M 2 R AN A ........... p L a W/k/w If j I V) ME 0 INS/, M --Mmw 0/01/000/1 r Mesa fi A A/d/111 j) v m/ �R 0/11 Ail 10 00 P A "OVIRP '03 "All, 0//,/ Mo ;71 4 ,OF, W k, i,,f W j j 0 7 o 10 1"'I 1111711 IFF/I vau;�%I, Population Density 7""4 4ii/��,,;�i/0 A/I of "evr" J I'fll F1 Of1f,"Afi 1 LIP, 000, TRIP 'I Dot 250 Persons with a Ofisabillity RECAPs N Raci,ally�Ethn,icall-Go,neentr,,ated k (':j� cd�f'lfz gg,,�, t r C i Areasuf Poverty gig riuov A Mi,nority(�onjcenitmliion Areas" Coll Bounde,iry V CRy Boundaries d', N C h U"Ila Comini u n ity Bou In d a nes "A Nil 'V"sta,_ 5 l �S I I PR C ol r o ni'a'd, d A "PW F/ ................................................ �5 iv, 15 -R,2 roy ell a 1 265 Z3 5 x""At A/6"I WAS 25 00, pe ri: I Beach: DRAW T&P m .......... "M sin 'S"6urces-.Bri,USGS-NOAA Sou Garmin,USGS,NP", �ri,IS N ril j -n ............ A immb 'AWY/ m/o/m/mr Ct, i,?h �111VTU�11111111� 1,: 4,4 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 275 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 1'7A1R 11(")IJ Persons with HIV/AIDS" The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, which is primarily enforced by HUD, prohibits housing discrimination against persons with disabilities, including persons with HIV/AIDS. California has the largest number of HIV and third largest number of AIDS cases in the United States; San Diego County has the third largest number of people living with HIV and AIDS in California. Since the HIV epidemic began in 1981, nearly 30,785 HIV or AIDS cases have been reported in San Diego County. New drugs, better treatment, and preventative education have reduced the number of fatalities. Persons with HIV/AIDS are living longer. Of 13,643 PLWHA in San Diego County as of December 2,016, 7,395 were diagnosed within the county (Table 23). The City of San Diego had the greatest proportion of diagnoses (67.8 percent), followed by Chula Vista (6.5 percent) and Oceanside (3.2 percent). Trailing behind were the communities in unincorporated areas,where only 2.7 percent of the county's PLWHA were diagnosed. Individuals diagnosed with HIV or AIDS in San Diego County are most commonly white, male, more than 49 years of age, and have had male-to-male sexual contact. Over the course of the epidemic, there has been a slow increase in the proportion of cases affecting people of color. The percentage of people of color who have been diagno�sed with HIV disease has continued to increase over time, from 28 percent in the 1980s to 53 percent in 2,016. The average age of HIV diagnosis has also increased from 34 years in 2007-2011 to 36 by 2012-2016. In 2016, 499 new HIV diagnoses were reported in the county, which is near the lower end of the overall range of cases reported annually since 2007 (481-619 cases). The primary source of funding for HIV/AIDS housing is HUD's Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) program.The City of San Diego is the HOPWA program grantee,but all HOPWA programs are administered by the County of San Diego Department of Housing and Community Development (HC,D). Established in 1992, the HOPWA program is desiLmed to provide States and localities with resources and incentives to develop long-term comprehensive strategies, that meet the housing and housing-related support service needs of low-income persons living with HIV/AIDS or related diseases and their families. In FY 2020 (HUD PY 2019) , the City of San Diego's Annual Action Plan included a $5.1 million budget for HOPWA programs ($4.2 million from the 2019 Program Year entitlement allocation and $1.4 million from prior year funds). Programs funded through the HOPWA must be housing related and designed to": • Provide affordable housing for low-income persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families; • Enable low-income persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families to become housed; • Provide services needed to enable low-income HIV/AIDS clients to remain housed, locate housing, and prevent homelessness. Several HOPWA-funded housing resources (Table 23) are in place;however,there are many more people looking for housing than there are units available,particularly affordable housing units. 14 All statistics in Persons with.H'IV/A'IDS section are taken from the"H'IV/A,'IDS Epidemiology Report 2016" (County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency,2016)unless otherwise noted. 15 City of San Diego,Fiscal Year 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. (2019) "01, A 4,5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 276 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 11(")IJ Table 22: People living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA) City/Community CPLWHA2 Percent Urban County Coronado 21 0.3% Del Mar <20 - Imperial Beach 48 01.6% Lemon Grove 53 01.7% Poway 26 01.4% Solana Beach <20 Unincorporated 202 2.7% Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 88 1.2% Chula Vista 478 6.5% F.I Cajon 183 2.5% I.lncinitas 37 01.5% F.scondido 125 1.7% La Mesa 105 1.4% National City 136 1.8(Vo Oceanside 239 3.2% San Diego 51014 67.8% San Marcos 53 01.7% Santee 57 01.8% Vista 122 1.6% Other3 195 2.6% Other4 213 2.9% Total County 7�395 100�.0% Notes: 1 Place of residence at time of diagnosis does not represent the place of HIV diagnosis/exposure. 2. Of those known to be diagnosed with I 11V in San Diego County and currently living in San Diego County through 12/31/2016. 3. Other communities: San Ysidro., La Jolla, and Camp Pendleton 4. Communities with <5 recent cases or <20 PLWHA: Alpine, Bonsall, Borrego Springs. Boulevard, Campo, C? , Camp Pendleton, Cardiff-by-the-Sea, Del Mar, Jamul, Julian,Pala,Pauma Valley,Rancho Bernardo,Rancho S)an ta Fe, Santa Ysabel, Solana Beach, Valley Center, Warner Springs. Source: F11V/A1DS Epidemiology Report 2016. County of San Diego Health.and Human Services Agency. `2 M�'Yf 1� 11 N, ?I? i"1, 1; 4,6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 277 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 1'11("')UJ Table 23: HOPWA Program Resources Agency/Program Units/P,rogram Capacity Emergency Housing Townspeople-Provides emergency beds in the form of hotel/motel vouchers for up to 21 41120 nights. Licensed Care Facility Fraternity House,Inc. _Provides 18 beds through Fraternity House (8) and Michaelle 20 House (10) for consumers who need 24-hour comprehensive care. Recovery Housing Stepping Stone of San Diego-Provides 15 beds through its Residential Treatment Program 6 located in the City Heights area in San Diego. Transitional Group Home St.Vincent de Paul Village,Inc. -Provides 38 beds through its five Josue Homes for 88 consumers who are ambulatory,self-sufficient and recovering substance abusers. Stepping.Stone of San Diego-Provides 17 beds through I 1.nya House for consumers who 17 have a minimum of 60 days sobriety and a commitment to long term recovery. Permanent Housing Community Housing Works/Marlisol Apartments- 10 unitsin Oceanside for consumers and their families. Support Services are provided. Community Housing Works/Old Grove-4 unitsIn Oceanside for consumers and their 4 families.Support services are provided. Mariposa Apartments-2 units in San Marcos for consumers and their families. 2 Mercy Gardens-23 units in the Hillcrest areain San Diego for consumers and their 23 families. Paseo del Oro Apartments -5 units in San Marcos for consumers and their families. 5 Shadow I lills- 5 units in Santee for consumers and their families. 5 Sierra Vista Apartments-5 units in San Marcos for consumers and their families. 5 South Bay Community Services/La Posada-.12 units in San Ysidro for consumers and their 12 families.Case management and support services are provided. Sonoma Court Apartments-2 units in Escondido for consumer and their families. 2 Spring Valley Apartments-9 units in Spring Valley for consumers and their families. 9 The Center-Sunburst Apartments-3 units for consumers who are between 18 -24 years of 3 age. Townspeople—34th Street Apartments-24 units in San Diego for consumers and their 524 families.Case Management services are provided. Townspeople—Vista del Puente Apartments- 12 units in San Diego for consumers and 12 their families. Case Management services are provided. Townspeople—51 st Street Apartments-3 units in San Diego for consumers and their 3 families.Case Management services are provided. Townspeople—Wilson Avenue Apartments-4 units in San Diego for consumers and their 4 families.Case Management services are provided. Tenant Based Rental Assistance County of San D�iego,Housing and Community Development(HCD)—Program provides rent sub si dits/vouchers for up to 80 consumers.Applicants are placed on a waiting list and preference is 80 o extremely low-income households with at least one family memb r an A'11) given t er having S diagnosis, August 2019. County of San Diego,Health&Human Services Agency,August 2019. 'Z M�'Yf U [1 N, ?I? i"1, 1; Q'i ly"'I" i'?. 4,7 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 278 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ 6. Homeless While homelessness is not a protected class, homeless persons are likely to belong to a protected class (e.g. Medical condition, disability). HUD defines homelessness in the following categories: • Category 1 (Literally Homeless): Individual or family who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence. • Category 2 (Imminent Risk of Homelessness): Individual or family who will imminently lose their primary nighttime residence. • Category 3 (Homeless under Other Federal Assistance): Unaccompanied youth under 25 years of age, or families with Category 3 children and youth, who do not otherwise qualify as homeles,s under this definition. • Category 4 (Fleeing/Attempting to Flee Domestic Violence): Any individual or family who is fleeing, or is attempting to flee, domestic violence; has no other residence; and lacks the resources or support networks to obtain other permanent housing. I lt,s tO [1(011(4ess This definition demonstrates the diversity of people Fahi`llot s�i i i A,I s(��) A I experiencing homelessness. The numerous places where Sh.efters people experiencing homelessness can be located complicate In 2013,the U.S.Department of Housing and efforts to accurately estimate their total population. For Urban Development(HUD) charged a example,an individual living with friends on a temporary basis homeless shelter in Pennsylvania and one of could be experiencing homelessness, but would be unlikely to its employees with refusing to accept a blind be identified in a homeless count. Since 2006, the San Diego man and his guide dog at a homeless Regional Task Force on the Homeless (RTFH) has conducted shelter. HUD's investigation found that the a point-in-time survey (PYI� to measure the county's homeless homeless man was denied a reasonable population, as well as to identify the needs of persons accommodation request to allow the man to experiencing homelessness. The 2019 San Diego Regional keep his dog in the shelter,in violation of the Homeless Point-In-Time Count took place on the night of Fair Housing Act. January25, 2019. The 2019 PIT count identified 8,102 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. homeles,s persons living in San Diego County (Table 24). Of the homeless persons counted, more than half(54.6 percent)were unsheltered—living in a place not meant for human habitation,while 24.8 percent were in an emergency shelter and 19.2 percent in a transitional housing program. When examining the different sub-regions within San Diego County, the City of San Diego had the largest proportion of the homeles,s persons (6�3.4 percent), followed by El Cajon with 9.8 percent of the region's homeless persons,. Since 2014,the total number of sheltered and unsheltered homeless persons enumerated during the annual PIT decreased by approximately five percent. Despite the overall decrease in homeless persons, the proportion of unsheltered persons has increased by 8.4 percentage points. The number of homeless persons sheltered on the selected night decreased by 20 percent over the five-year period (4,521 in 2014 to 3,635, in 2019),while the number of unsheltered homeless persons counted increased by 12.3 percent (3,984 in 2014 to 4,476 in 2019). Many homeless service providers attributed the overall decrease to the new "Housing First" model and the Continuum of Care system (described later). This approach recognizes many people cannot to address their other issues (e.g., employment, health, and emotional) until they have a more stable housing arrangement. "01, A 4,8 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 279 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 11(")IJ S""U'r,'',,�C; The point-in-time count is just a snapshot of how many homeless people are on streets and in emergency and transitional shelters on any given day in the San Diego region. RTFH estimated that over the course of the year more than 20,000 people experience homelessness in San Diego County. In addition, the 2019 PIT count used new methodology under HUD guidance "to survey a higher percentage of those experiencing homelessness where you meet them and to count people rather than structures or vehicles." 16The change in methodology resulted in changes in the PIT counts from previous years. Table 24: Homelessness Population by Jurisdiction—2018 and 2019 20�18 2019 jurisdiction Sheltered Unsheltered Total %o Sheltered Unsheltered Total of County I Cou Urban County Coronado 0 6 6 0.1 O/o� 0 1 1 0.01Y(.) Del Mar* 0 3 3 0.0(Yo -- 6-- 6-- Imperial Beach 0 20 20 0.2(Yo 12 12 0.1(Y. Lemon Grove 0 52 52 0.6(Yo 35 35 0.4% Poway 0 15 15 0.2(Yo 9 9 0-11yo Solana Beach* 0 0 0 0.0 O/o� 4-- Unincorporated 6 445 451 5.30/0� 0 224 224 2.8'Y(,.) Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 58 152 210 58 59 1012 161 2.0'Y(,) Chula Vista 108 229 337 108 79 242 321 4.0% El Cajon 391 288 679 391 489 298 787 9-81yo Encinitas 39 86 125 39 41 79 120 1.5(Vo Escondido 148 263 411 148 109 241 350 4.4(Vo LaMesa 29 12 41 29 0 46 46 0.6% National City 32 201 233 32 0 94 94 1.2% Oceanside 157 326 483 157 202 193 395 4.9% San Diego 2�282 21630 41912 21)282 21)482 21)600 55082 63�.4% San Marcos 0 62 62 0 46 46 0.6(Vo Santee 0 46 46 - 0 35 35 0.4% Vista 336 154 490 336 174 122 296 3.'7(Vo Total County 3�586 41990 81576 3�586 3�635 4�379 81014 100.0% Notes:P Fhc 2019 San Diego Regional Homeless Profile indicate 8,102 persons enumerated in the Point-in-'Fim e Count.The data presented in the report indicates only 8,014. *Del Mar and Solana Beach.counts reported under the Encinitas community totals. Source:San Diego Regional Taskforce on the Homeless 2019 Annual Report on Homelessness in the San Diego Region. 16 San Diego Regional Taskforce on the Homeless 2019 Annual Report on Homelessness in the San Diego Region. ,Z M�,Yf U [1 N, I? i"1, 1; 4,9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 28,0 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR Formerly homeless persons often have a very difficult time finding housing once they have moved from transitional housing or other assistance programs. Housing affordabilit:y for those who were formerly homeless is challenging from an economics standpoint, but this demographic group may also encounter fair housing issues when property owners/managers refuse to rent to formerly homeless persons. The perception may be that they are more economically(and sometimes mentally) unstable. Homeless persons may also exp�erience discrimination in homeless shelters. This can occur in the form of discrimination based on protected classes, rules or policies with a disparate impact on a protected class, or lack of reasonable accommodation. A variety of public and nonprofit agencies in San Diego County also offer services to assist individuals and families in obtaining and maintaining adequate housing, including tho�se who are currently homeless as defined by HUD and formerly homeless persons. These agencies administer programs that include rental assistance, housing rehabilitation, shared housing,public housing, and home purchasing assistance. 7o Farm Workers As traditionally defined, farm workers are persons whose primary incomes are earned through permanent or seasonal agricultural labor. Permanent farm workers tend to work in fields or processing plants. During harvest periods when workloads increase, the need to supplement the permanent labor force is satisfied with seasonal workers. Often these seasonal workers are migrant workers, defined by the inability to return to their primary residence at the end of the workday. Determining the actual number of farm workers in a region is difficult due to the variability of the definitions used by government agencies and other peculiarities endemic to the farming industry. Agricultural work can include weeding, thinning, planting, pruning, irrigation, tractor work, pesticide applications, harvesting, transportation to the cooler or market, and a variety of job�s at packing and processing facilities. According to 2013-2017 ACS data, just over 8,300 residents of San Diego County were employed in farming, fishing, or forestry occupations. Estimates provided by other governmental agencies include 8,700 (Total Farm Employment, California Employment Development Department, 2019). The number of farm workers,however,varies depending upon the different growing seasons.The numbers can change quickly as more work becomes available. This population remains highly migratory, following the work as it becomes available and even returning home for short periods during the off-season. just under one-third of the estimated farm worker population is located in the unincorporated county areas. The Cities of Escondido) Vista, and San Diego had the greatest proportions of farm worker population (17.8 percent for Escondido and San Diego, 13.5 percent in Vista).. The geographic distribution of farm workers in San Diego County generally corresponds with agricultural production areas. According to the California Department of Conservation's farmland maps,, agricultural production in the countyis concentrated in the unincorporated north inland areas of the county around Interstate 15) north of the cities of Vista, San Marcos, and Escondido, and west of the Cleveland National Forest areas. County land use data also indicated that most agricultural activity consists of orchards and vineyards or field crops. Only a small portion of agricultural land is used for intensive agricultural uses. "01' A 50 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 28,1 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR I'll(AIJ Table 25: Farm Worker Population of San Diego County Percent of All Persons Jurisdiction #of Employed in Fartning, Persons Fishing,and Forestry i Occupations Urban County Coronado 0 01.0% Del Mar 0 01.0% Imperial Beach 0.0% Lemon Grove 22 0.3% Poway 0.0% Solana Beach 33 0.4% Unincorporated 2540 30.6% Total Urban County 2595 31.2% Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 125 1.5% Chula Vista 190 2.3% El Cajon 64 01.8% 01.5% Encinitas 39 Escondido 1)477 17.80/() La Mesa 73 0.9(V() National City 92 1.1(V() Oceanside 640 7.7% San Diego 1478 17.8% San Marcos 405 4.9% 10 Santee 0.1% Vista 11120 13.5% Total County 8)308 100.0% Source:American Community Survey(AC'S).,2013-2017. Although there exists little consensus as to the number of farm workers in San Diego County, analysis reveals that this group has special housing needs. According to San Diego County's 2017 Housing Element Background Report, farmworker housing constitutes a critical housing need in the unincorporated area due to the year-round agricultural production that generates a permanent presence of farm labor force. The median size of a firm San Diego County is less than 10 acres. These small, non- traditional farms often employ temporary workers but are not large enough to accommodate on-site farmworker housing. These rural homeless persons typically reside in camps located throughout the county. These encampments are generally small in size and are frequently at the edge of their employer's property in fields, hillsides, canyons, ravines, or ri.verbeds. According to the Regional Task Force on the Homeless (RTFH),most of these homeless workers are undocumented immigrants whose families reside elsewhere.17 Due to the migratory nature of these farmworkers, the camps typically are temporary establishments and are not legally permitted. Consequently, this population is often under-counted. The 17 Regional Homeless Profile October 2006,Regional Task Force on the Homeless, littp:ZZvANr\k,.rtf-'hsd.()rgZdocs j2rofiic/ut-iincorporatcd.d(,)c.As citcd in the 2017 Housing Elcment Background Report. `2 M�'Yf U [1 N, ?I? 1, 1; 51 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 28,2 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ RTFH reports that much of the recent information they have acquired is anecdotal and that camps have been dwindling. California Employment Development Department (EDD) estimates that the average salary for farm workers and laborers working in the Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations in the San Diego- Carlsbad-San Marcos MSA in 2019 was approximately $32,872, less than half of the average $6�8,049 for full-time,year-round workers with earnings. Given the relatively low incomes of farmworker households, an increasingly important need for the permanently employed farmworkers is affordable rental housing.. Low wages, high housing costs, and seasonal nature of this occupational category means many farm workers are homeless at their place of employment while their families may reside elsewhere. Farm workers can benefit from programs and services that provide assistance to lower and moderate- income households in general, such as the Housing Choice Voucher program, which offers rental assistance to residents. According to the County of San Diego Housing Resources Directory 2020, one development in the City of San Marcos (Firebird Manor) and one in Fallbroo�k (Fallbrook View Apartments) provide 98 units of affordable housing for farm workers and their families. In addition, 40 affordable units at Old Grove Apartments in the City of Oceanside are reserved for farm workers and and/or Day Laborers. 8�. Military Personnel and Veterans San Diego is one of the largest military regions in the United States. The county is the third largest in the U.S. in terms of veteran residents, and the number one destination for veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan as of 2013.18 San Diego County has a strong military personnel presence due to the various large military bases,including Naval Air Station North Island,Naval Station San D�iego�,Naval Base Point Loma, Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. The military population increases the demand for low-cost rental housing. Military personnel generally earn lower incomes and their length of residency is often uncertain. Although the need is partially met by the supply of military housing,the demand outweighs the supply.Eligibility for military housing is based on pay grade (which is based on rank) and family size. In addition to housing concerns,veterans may experience specific difficulties when reintegrating into the civilian labor force. These include: trouble translating military experience to civilian work, lack of resume, )ob search, and interview experience; time needed to "decompress;" and health issues (physical and mental) from military service.19 Although one percent of the U.S. population lives in San Diego County, the region is home to more than five percent of the active duty U.S. military population. Approximately 143,000 active duty personnel are stationed in San Diego County. The 2013-2017 ACS data estimates that veterans made up seven percent (225,694 persons) of the population in the county. The City of San Diego was home to a plurality of the regional veteran population (40 percent). 18 County of San Di.ego and San Di.ego Regional, Chamber of Commerce, "Military Employment in San D�iego" ganuary 2013). 19 "01, 52 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 28,3 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Due to the region's high cost of living, many families at the lower range of pay and housing allowance barely meet the California Family Needs Standard"' (formerly the Self-Sufficiency Standard) for San Diego. The Family Needs Calculator measures the minimum income necessary to cover all of a non-elderly(under 65 years old) and non-disabled individual or family's basic expenses — housing, food, child care, health care, transportation, and taxes — without public or private assistance. According to the Calculator, 35 percent of households in San Diego County live below the "standard." The 2019 Regional Homeless Profile estimates that six percent(446 persons) of all homeless adult persons in San Diego (8,102 persons), at a single point in time,were veterans of the U.S. Armed Forces and nearly half of the homeless veterans were chronically homelesS.21 Housing and supportive service needs for military personnel are addressed by the Department of Defense, while the needs of veterans are addressed at the community level. The Veteran Services division of the County's Health and Human Services Agency provides benefit information and assistance, plus other support to San Diego County veterans and their families. Services offered through Veterans Services includes comprehensive benefits counseling, claims preparation and submission,, claims follow-up to ensure final decisions) initiation and development of appeals, and networking and advocacy with federal, state and local agencies. The Veteran's Village of San Diego (VVSD) provides a continuum of care with a full range of comprehensive and innovative services for military veterans. VVSD has five locations throughout San Diego County where they provide services to more than 3,000 military veterans annually. """'I)d a Cranes t e Hate crimes—violent acts against peoPle,property,or organizations motivated by a bias related to victim's race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, or physical or mental disability — become a fair housing concern when residents are intimidated or harassed at their residence or neighborhood. Fair housing violations due to hate crimes also occur when people will not consider moving into certain neighborhoods or have been run off from their homes for fear of harassment or physical harm. The federal Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to threaten,harass,intimidate or act violently toward a person who has exercised their right to free housing choice. Persons who break the law have committed a serious crime and can face time in prison, large fines or both, especially for violent acts, serious threats of harm, or injuries to victims. In addition, this same behavior may violate similar state and local laws, leading to more punishment for those who are responsible. Some examples, of illegal behavior include threats made in person, writing or by telephone; vandalism of the home or property; rock throwing; suspicious fires, cross-burning or bombing; or unsuccessful attempts at any of these. The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd,Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 greatly expanded the federal government's ability to prosecute hate crimes without having to show that the defendant was engaged in a federally protected activity. The Shepard-Byrd Act also empowers the department to prosecute crimes committed because of a person's sexual orientation,gender identity,gender or disability as hate crimes. The FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program releases Hate Crime Statistics annually. Table 26 shows that 71 hate crimes were reported in San Diego County in 2018. The jurisdiction with the largest 20 The Self-Sufficiency Standard for California,2018.Center for Women's Welfare,University of Washington.Based on U.S. Census Bureau,2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Public Use Microdata Sample. 21 San Diego Regional,Taskforce on the Homeless,"2019 San Diego Regional Homeless Profile". "01, A 53 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 28,4 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ number of hate crimes was the City of San Diego (40 cases). More than half of reported hate crimes,appear to have been motivated by the victim's race, ethnicity, or ancestry. Close to a quarter of reported hate crimes appear to be motivated by the victim's sexual orientation and another 23 percent of hate crimes by religion. However, observations by staff and service providers indicated a spike in hate crimes by religion in 2019. Hate crimes of all motivations have declined in San Diego region by 28 percent between 2013 and 2018 (Figure 5). However,reporting hate crimes is voluntary on the part of the local jurisdictions. Some states started submitting data only recently, and not all jurisdictions are represented in the reports. Many jurisdictions across the country, including those with well-documented histories of racial prejudice, reported zero hate crimes. Another obstacle to gaining an accurate count of hate crimes is the reluctance of many victims to report such attacks. However, the incidence of hate crimes appear to be increasing since 2018.While 2019 crime reports have not been published as of April 2020, some jurisdictions reported an increase in hate crimes based on r C"i religion in 2019. A study by the California State University or -)an Bernardino reported 15 hate crimes on between January 1 and May 31 in the City of San Diego with religion being the top bias for these hate crimeS22. In addition-,on April 2020, the San Diego County District Attorney launched a hate crime online reporting form and hotline in response to reported incidents of hate crimes against Asian Americans as a result of COVID-19. Whether these are situational upticks or the beginning of trends remains to be seen.23 Figure 5: Change I*n Hate Crl*mes between 20�13 and 2018 -28% Total 0.0% Gender identity 0.0% Gender O�.0% Disability -26.1% Sexual Orientation -15.8% Religion Race/Ethnicity/Ancestry -35.0% -30.0% -25.0% -20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% Source: U.S.Federal Bureau of Investigation,Hate Crime Statistics,2018. 22 Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism. "F'actbook on hate&extremism in the U.S.&i nternation ally" (2019). California State University of San Bernardino, 23 City News Service."DA launches hate crime hotline due to incidents against Asians during pandemic"(April 30,2020).Fox 5 News San Diego. "01, A 54 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 28,5 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR Table 26: Hate Crime Statistics—2018 Race/ Sexual Gender Jurisdiction Ethnl'cl'ty/ Religion Orientation Disability Gender Identity Total I Ancest!y J Urban County Cities Coronado 0' 0' 0 0 0 0 0 Del Mar 0' 0' 0 0 0 0 0 Imperial Beach 1 0' 0 0 0 O � 1 Lemon Grove 0' 0' 0 0 0 0 0 Poway ON 11 01 ON 0 1 01 in Solana Beach 01 01 01 01 oil 0 1 0 Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 4 2 0 0 01 0 6 Chula Vista 1 1 0 0 0 0' 2 El Cajon 3 0 1 0 0 4 Encinitas 0 3 0 0 0 0' 3 Escondido 2 0 0 0 0 0' 2 La Mesa 1 0 0 0 01 0 1 National City, 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Oceanside 2 0 0 0 01 0 2 San Diego 20 8 12 0 01 0 40 San Marcos 1 0 0 0 0 0' 1 Santee 1 0 0 0 0 0' 1 Vista 0 0 1 0 0 0' 1 San Diego County 2 1 3 0 0 0' 6 Total County 38 16 17 0 0 0 71 Percentage 53.5% 22.5% 23.90/o 0.0% 0.0% 0.0010 100.0% Note:Hate CTiive3tedis1iq,20�18 includes data about bias-motivated incidents reported by law enforcement agencies throughout the nation.However,no estimates are included for agencies that do not submit reports. Source: U.S.Federal Bureau of Investigation,Hate Crime Statistics,2018. 'Z M�'Yf U [1 N, ?I? i"1, 1; Q'i ly"'I"1,�'i'? 55 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 28,6 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; E. In.come P111111"ofille Household income is the most important factor determining a household's ability to balance housing costs with other basic life necessities. Regular income is the means by which most individuals and families finance current consumption and make provision for the future through saving and investment. The level of cash income can be used as an indicator of the standard of living for most of the population. While economic factors that affect a household's housing choice are not a fair housing issue per se, the relationships among household income, household type, race/ethnicity, and other factors often create misconceptions and biases that raise fair housing concerns. 1, Median Household Income The 2013-2,017 ACS data shows that the median household income for San Diego County was $70,588. Approximately 36 percent of the co�unty's households earned less than $50,000, nearly 30 percent earned between $50,000 and $991,9199 and 35 percent earned more than $100,000 between 2013 and 2017 (Figure 6). Median income between 2013 and 2017 ranged from a hicrh of$122,563 in Del Mar to a low of$43,168 C"i in National City (Table 217). Areas with high median household incomes are found along the coastal cities of Del Mar and Solana Beach and in Poway. The income gap between cities can be attributed to many factors,,including the high cost of housing on the coast, the cities with lower incomes having significantly younger residents, having fewer professional and management employees, or having more students. Many of the cities with lower median incomes are also cities with a higher proportion of non-white population. For instance, the percent minority population in the jurisdictions with the lowest median incomes Imperial Beach, El Cajon, and National City is 69, 44, and 90 percent,, respectively. As stated earlier in this chapter, the median income for Black, Hispanic American Indian, and Alaska Native households was, less than 75 percent of the county median while Asian and White household median incomes were 125 and 114 percent of the county median income. In another example,per capita income for Black, Asian, and Hispanic households was five, 12 and 33 percent respectively of the county per capita income, compared with White, non-Hispanic households who earned 46 percent of the county per capita income from 2013 to 2017. According to 2013 and 2017 ACS data, the median income in the county appears to have risen both in absolute terms and when adjusted for inflation (Table 27). Median county income jumped from $62,962 to $70,588 between 2013 and 2017, a 12-percent gain in absolute terms. However, adjusting the 2013 income to 2017,the number becomes $66,602,with a resulting change to a 6-percent increase. Even when adjusted for inflation, most cities saw an increase in median income, except for Imperial Beach which experienced a modest decline of approximately four percent during this period.24However, based on F'igure 6, it appears that median income increases are due to the increase in the proportion of households earning more than $100,000. 24 inflation calculated with.U.S.Department of Labor,Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator https:Z/data.bls.Lyov/c(,Yi-bi.nZcpicalc.t)] "01, A 56 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 28,7 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 1'11("')UJ Figure 6: San Diego County Household Income 40.0% 3 5.O'Yo 30.0% 01, 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0"Vo 1� 0.0% Less than 251,000 2500 to $491999 $50)000 to $75)000 to >$1 001000 $741999 $991999 2013 18.9% 21.4% 17.2% 13.1% 29.4% 2017 16.4% 19.4% 16.8% 12.9% 34.5% Source:American Community Survey(ACS),2006-2010,2013-2017. M�111 Q,, 57 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 28,8 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Table 27: Median Household Income Median Median %Change Household Household Median 2013-2017 jurisdiction Income Income Household (Inflation- 2013 2013 Income Adjusted (Not Adjusted for (In 2017 Inflation- (2017) Dollars) Inflation) usted Dollars) Urban County Coronado $91J03 $96)371 $99�641 3.4% Del Mar $107)457 $113)670 $1221563 7.8% Imperial Beach $49�268 $52)117 $49�950 42% Lemon Grove $511496 $541474 $601t309 10.7% Poway $931856 $991283 $102�338 3.1% Solana Beach $86)451 $91450 $103�864 13.6% Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad $83)908 $885760, $102�722 15.7% Chula Vista $64)801 $685548 $701197 2.4'Y(,.) .A Cajon $44)112 $465663 $491445 6.0'Y(,.) I.1.ncinitas $91)795 $975103 $103M2 6.9'Y(,.) Escondido $49)362 $52)216 $58�834 12.7% La Mesa $53)605 $56)704 $59�629 5.2% National City $37)933 $40)126 $43J 68 7.6% Oceanside $58)153 $61)515 $61�778 0.4% San Diego $64)0158 $675762 $711535 5.6'Y(,.) San Marcos $53,657 $565759 $701417 24.1% Santee $70,899 $745998 $811430 8.6% Vista $47,346 $505084 $591)833 19�.5% Total County $62�962 $66�602 $70�588 6.0% State of California $61)094 $64)626 $671169 3.9(Vo Source:Community Survey(ACS),2009-2013 and 2013-2017;U.S,.Department of Labor,Bureau of Labor Statistics. 0 2. Income Distribution HUD periodically receives "custo�m tabulations" of Census data from the U.S. Census Bureau that are largely not available through standard Census products. The most recent estimates are derived from the 2012-2016 ACS.These data,known as the"CHAS" data (Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy), demonstrate the extent of housing problems and housing needs, particularly for low-income households. The CHAS cross-tabulates the Census data to reveal household income in a community in relation to the Area Median Income (AMI). For purposes, of most housing and community development activities,HUD has established four income categories based on the Area Median Income (AMI) for the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). HUD income definitions differ from the State of California income definitions. Table 28 compares the HUD and State income categories. This Al report is a HUD-mandated study and therefore HUD income definitions are used. "01, A 58 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 28,9 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR Table 28,: Income Categories HUD Definition State of California(HCD')% Extremely Low Income Less than 30%of AMI Extremely Low Income I.,ess than 30%of-AMI Low Income 31-50%of AMI Very Low Income 31-50%of-AM1 Moderate Income 51-800/()of AMI Low Income 51-80(Y()of AMI Moderate Income 81-1200/()of AMI Middle/tJpper Income Greater than 80%of AMI Above Moderate Income Greater than 1201-Yt)of AMI Source:Department of Housing and Urban Development and California Department of Housing and CommunityDevelopment,2013. Table 29: Income Distribution, 2012-�2016 19 'W Total Extremely Eow Low Income Moderate Middle/Upper 1 1 Income Income Income jur*sd*ction Households (0-30%) (31-50%) (51-80%) (80%+�) Urban County Coronado 8�980 8.6 O/o 9.4% 14.00/6 67.9% Del Mar 2�260 16�.4% 4.0�'/o 2.2% 77.4% Imperial Beach V45 20.6% 18.4% 23.00/6 38.0% Lemon Grove 8)465 14.7% 16.5% 21.8% 47.0% Poway 1500 S.TV6 8.9% 12.9% 69�.5')/o Solana Beach 5)750 7.6%� 7.7% 12.2% 7 2-5')/o Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 42)1925 10.5% 7.5% 11.20/6 70.8% Chula Vista 77)1810 15.7% 13.7% 18.40/6 52.3% El Cajon 32,1940 24.80/6� 17.8% 19.1% 38.3% Encinitas 23,16�90 9.9% 9.3% 9.6% 71.1% Escondido 45)220 18.6% 18.4 VC) 19.1% 43.8�0 La Mesa 23)770 15.2% 14.6 VC) 19.9% 50.4�0 National City 15)860 29.1% 18.1 0 23.3% 29�.5�0 Oceanside 61)475 16�.1% 13.7 VC) 21.0% 49�.2�0 San Diego 490,1220 15.1 0/6� 12.2% 16.6% 56.1% San Marcos 29,1125 16.6 0/6� 14.4% 18.3% 50.7% Santee 19,1520 9.1% 10.0% 18.8% 62.1% Vista 30,16�35 16.5 0/6� 18.8% 21.2% 1 43�.5% Total County 1)103)125 15.1% 13.0% 17.4% 54.4% Note:Data presented in this table is based on special tabulations from sample Census data.The number of households in each category usually deviates slightly from the 100% count due to the need to extraPolate sample data out to total households.Interpretations of this data should focus on the proportion of households in need of assistance rather than on precise numbers. Source:HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS)Data,2012-2016. 'Z M�'Yf 1� I"I N, I? i"1, 1; 59 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 290 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ 1 JtV 3. Income b-x7- Household Tvne and Race/Ethn*c Y .1 F Household income often varies by household type and tenure. As shown', in Table 30, the majorityof the City's extremely low, low, and moderate-income households experienced at least one housing problem and cost burden. As defined by CHAS, housing problems include: • Units with physical defects (lacking complete kitchen or bathroom); • Overcrowded conditions (housing units with more than one person per room); • Housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 30 percent of gross income; and • Severe housing cost burden, including utilities, exceeding 50 percent of gros,s, income. Renter households were also disproportionately affected with housing problems. The percentage of owner households with housing problems was 35.1 percent between 2012 and 2016,compared to the 56.8 percent of renter households.When comparing by household types,a greater proportion of renter elderly, renter small family, and renter large family households faced housing problems than owner households of the same type. Race/ethnicity can indicate housing need to the extent that different race/ethnic groups earn different incomes. Overall, lower-income households represented just over 28 percent of all households in San Diego County in 2012-2,016. However, certain groups had higher proportions of lower-income households. Specifically, Hispanic (40.9 percent) and Black (36�.8 percent) households had a considerably higher proportion of lower-income households than the rest of the county (Table 31). Proportionally fewer Asian (22.8 percent) and Non-Hispanic White households (22.9 percent) fell in the lower-income category compared to the county average. "01, A 60 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 291 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR Table 30: Housing Assistance Needs of Low and Moderate Income Households (20�12-2016) Renters Owners Household by Type,Income& Elderly Small Large Elderly Small Large Total Housing Problem (65 years Families Families Total (65 years Families Families Total Households or older) (1-4 (5+ Renters or older) (1-4 (5+ Owners members) members) members) members) Extremely Low Income 26�585 43)555 13)770 119)030 233750 13)230 23210 4,7)700 166)730 (0-30%AMI) (Yt)of Household Type 37.2% 19.2% 24.6% 22.8% 12.4% 5.1% 3�.9% 8.2% 15.1% #O/o with Any Housing Problems 74.111/o 85.50/6 96.80/6 79.70/6 69.70/6 59.10/6 89.60/6 66.9% 76.0% #0/0 with Cost Burden> 30% 73.011/o 84.50/6 91.80/6 78.10/6 69.50/6 58.20/6 84.20/6 66.1% 74.6% Low Income 15)100 41)795 13)615 93)670 26)435 13)110 4)985 49)995 143)665 (31-50%AMI) 0/6 of Household Type 21.1% 18.4% 24.3% 18.0% 13.8% 5.0% 8.7% 8.6% 13.0% #O/o with Any Housing Problems 81.00/0 88.80/6 95.50/6 89.30/6 51.30/6 75.60/6 84.10/6 63.1% 80.2% #',Yo with Cost Burden> 30% 79.91,Y0 86.1(Yo 81.9% 85.8% 51.0% 74.3% 68.1(Vo 61-O'Vo 77.2'Vo Moderate Income %930 50,650 13,550 107,295 351855 291855 10,295 85J45 192�440 (51-80%AMI) (Yo of I lousehold Type 16.7% 22.3% 24.2% 20.6% 18.7% 11.4% 18.0% 14.6% 17.4% f #%with Any I lousing Problems 64.4% 66.6(//0 8 2.9 /0 6 8.4/0 40�.5% 66.6% 74.4% 5 6.7 yo 63.2�0 #%with Cost Burden> 30(Vo 60.6% 5 9.3 4 4.9 /0 59.3% 40�.1% 65.3% 56.0% 53.8�0 56.9�0 Middle/Upper Income 17,800 91,365 1510�15 201,495 1051865 205fiN 39,815 398,805 600,300 (81%+AMI) (Yo of I lousehold Type 24.9% 40.2% 26.8% 38.6% 55.2% 78.5% 69.5% 68.6% 54.4% #%with Any I lousing Problems 26.6% 2 0.9 4 6.5 2 2.1 19.5% 21.4% 34.4% 23.1�0 22.8�0 %witb cost burden > 30% 23.4% 16.3% 12.5% 16.6�% 19.1% 20.5% 21.4% 21.2% 19�.7% Total Households 71)415 227)365 55)95�O 5�21)490 1911905 261)875 57)305 581)645 1)103)135 %with. Any Housing Problems 62.1% 55.9% 79.6% 56.8% 34.0% 31.2% 48.0% 35.1% 45.4% %with.Cost Burden > 30% 60.0% 51.7% 56.7% 51.9% 33.7% 30.2% 34.1% 33.1% 42.0% Note:Data presented in this table is based on special tabulations from sample Census data.The number of households in each category usually deviates slightly from7he 100'Yo count due to the need to extrapolate sample data out to total households.Interpretations of this data should focus on the proportion of households in need ofassistance rather than on precise numbers. Source:HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS),2012-2016. ? Q'i ly"'I"1,�'i'?X (""10 1 61 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 292 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Table 31: Inco�me by Race/Ethnicity Non- Income Level All Households Hispanic Hispanic Black Asian White or Latino Extremely Low Income(0�-30')/o AMI) 16,6��720 15.1% 12.30/() 21.1% 21.8% 12.7% Low Income (31-50"/o_AMI) 143)680 13.0% 10.6% 19.8% 15.0% 10.1% Moderate Income (51-80%.AMI) 192440 17.4% 15.6% 22.2% 19�.6% 15.6% Middle/Upper Income (81% +-AMI) 600)305 54.4% 61.5% 36.9% 43.5% 61.6% Percent of Total Households 1J03J45 100.0% 57.6% 24.5% 4.8% 10.3% Note:Data presented in this table is based on special tabulations from sample Census data.The number of households in each category usually deviates slightly from the 100% count due to the need to extrapolate sample data out to total households. Interpretations of this data should focus on the proportion of households in need of assistance rather than on precise numbers. Source:HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS)Data,2012-2016. &*,"% 0 40 uoncentrations of Lower- and Moderate-Income Populations Figure 7 shows the Lower and Moderate Income (LMI) areas in the county by Census block group. Determining LMI areas is important for programming Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) activities. The CD�BG program requires that each CDB�G funded activity must "either Principally benefit low- and moderate-in.come persons,aidin, the prevention or elimination,of slums, or blight,or meet a community development need,having a particular-urgency." Activities,may also qualify for CDBG funds if the activity will benefit all the res1d,ents of a primarily residential area where at least 51 percent of the residents are-low- and moderate-in come persons. Typically, HUD defines a LMI area as a Census tract or block group where over 51 percent of the population is LMI. However, certain communities are higher income,with few block groups qualifying as LMI using this definition. These communities are considered "exception" jurisdictions. The cities of Carlsbad, Encinitas, and Santee are identified by HUD as "exception" jurisdictions (where their LMI thresholds are not set at 51 percent). LMI areas in these communities are defined as the top 25 percent (fourth quartile) of block groups with the highest concentration of low-and moderate-income population. For FY 2019-20�, the LMI thresholds for these "exception" jurisdictions are: • City of Carlsbad: 39.2 percent • City of Encinitas,: 3�9.8 percent • City of Santee: 45.2 percent Low-and moderate-income (LMI) areas are concentrated in three very general areas.In the North County area,, LMI areas are seen at Camp Pendleton and in the cities of Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, and Escondido in a pattern generally following State Route 78. In the southern portion of the county, clusters of LMI areas are seen in the central and southern areas of the City of San Diego and continuing down to the U.S./Mexico border. In the East County areas, there are vast LMI areas in sparsely populated parts of the unincorporated county and in the City of El Cajon. "01, A 62 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 293 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FT`S"]1'(�)l F'AlR H1(")UJ SUl'',,�('; Figure 7: Low and Moderate Income Areas fI & 'V-77 W/ OP, 61/1 F,f r V, J 7, A TW"r Nle w-v,4,j es,.n 11", �1�Ili", J1 7 110110....... f p� an 777) Isixa, ;t n i fl-r"IfriT,rk,a I v 1 AT pm. Mimm NMI n ld� X lip r�lsbad err It Ehidifilta's n —7 "VA 1.-0-6-Y Is a a n Beach X Poway A Del pr,�,viwvilll,a TH'an cis, /p, 1,1 d I"t n % c�r v"'I I a,401 Ma e"', J)n 4,,11 a 1, V 9,1�411 1'i ir-4 III �C-. a, 4'E,)11111,r,,f'��V /gf 00 Sant6e- P, 0 111 4/1 Al" fdw"W "M14 A/V 41111 f "A 413, A t 0 n Tot (t Low and Moderate InI Areas* All coun,ty Boundary p VA, A City Boundaries iI 14/0-111-"�"(I'I'.5"f" Communo Boundaries ............................. p ello 11,If all,f li_,wl IuKwc k,,,nn p mv i ve r H nvv qi I�r,pL yr Loloron o, "Chula Vista eR 4�,"pr,11n, We rlrd Se,I rI t I rwv rmllr k��c SarrIcre if,196, '7/// r14 3,11,1 S, R ful(7)4J IN"T"i'll 10 % 0 1.25 2,5 5 !El A'Al Mites J/1' P aj r 0 DRAW i A,I, V GI S Or Esh,Garmin USGSri,,-NPS ources:Esri USGS N Aolurces', 63 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 294 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ 540 Uoncentrations of Poverty National poverty data suggests that people living in poverty tend to be clustered in certain communities rather than being evenly distributed across geographic areas. Identifying concentrations of poverty is important because living in areas with many other poor people has been shown to places burdens on low- income families beyond what the families' own individual circumstances would dictate. Other research indicates that this, concentration of poverty can result in higher crime rates, underperforming public schools, poor housing and health conditions, as well as limited access to private services and job opportunities."The consequences of poverty are particularly harmful to children. Children who grow up in densely poor neighborhoods and attend low-income schools face many barriers to academic and occupational achievement. Countywide, over 13 percent of residents (or 427,031 persons) were living below the poverty level 21 (according to 2013-2017 ACS data)�. Povertywas more prevalent for specific groups such as Hispanics 18.7 percent), Blacks (19.9 percent), and adults with less than a high school education (23.4 percent). In contrast, 12.6 percent of White residents, 10.3 percent of Asian residents, and five percent of residents with at least a bachelor's degree were living below the poverty level during the same time period. Figure 8 shows the geographic concentration of poverty in San Diego County(areas where the proportion of persons living in poverty is greater than countywide). According to the 2013-2017 ACS estimates, 13.3 percent of the population is living below the poverty line countywide. Similar to low- and moderate- income areas, areas of poverty concentration are clustered in three general areas of the County. In North County, concentrations can be seen in the cities of Oceanside, San Marcos, Escondido, Carlsbad and Encinitas. In the southern portion of the county, concentrations can be seen in the central areas of the City of San Diego. Increasing concentrations of low-income and poverty households are linked to racial and ethnic concentrations. In East County,poverty concentrations can be seen in many parts of the unincorporated county and in El Cajon. Many of the areas with a concentration of poverty in the western part of the county (in and around the incorporated cities) are also areas with minority concentrations. In some areas such as La Jolla and San Marco�s, the large student populations may contribute to poverty concentrations. In an effort to identify racially/ethnic aRy-concentrated areas of poverty (RECAPs), HUD has identified census tracts with a majority non-White population (greater than 50 percent) and has a poverty rate that exceeds 40 percent or is three times the average tract poverty rate for the metro/micro area, whichever threshold is lower.An analysis of racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty is important because families who live in such neighborhoods encounter challenges and stresses that hinder their ability to reach their full potential, and such neighborhoods impose extra costs, on neighboring communities and the region. In San Diego County, there are RECAPs scattered in small sections of Escondido, El Ca)on, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, and Chula Vista. Larger RECAP clusters can be seen in the central/southern portion of the City of San Diego. 25 U.S.Census Bureau,"Areas with.Concentrated Poverty:2006�-201 0". American Community Survey Briefs,December 2 0 11. 26 The U.S.Census Bureau determines poverty status by comparing annual income to a set of dollar values called poverty thresholds that vary by family size,number of children,and age of householder.If a family's before tax money income is less than the dollar value of their threshold, then that family and every individual in it are considered to be in poverty. For people not living in families,poverty status is determined by companing the individual's income to his or her poverty threshold. 0 M�'Yf U [1 N, ?I? 1, 1; 64 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 295 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11("AIJ SUl'',,�('; Figure 8: Poverty Concentration Areas F, 00"W1 A A,L,K"":,w W, W, 0,1,01yr/n, d W Y 50 ?1.11 MAK", f�n T' Of I,rI 0/11 000/0" ,00 'A"OF 10"T- n J A, Oceanside OF Vista Y",-to q P// b, jo j, rEsc ido San M'arcos ond Carlsbad PIP 'r!/or 000011 'ANNOWN/V I,,,-lEncinitas ................... Solana Beach Poway, Del & 7/0 Mar I I e/vv�/ "`r/ R M/Old It" F ;1/1",z,/ /Alf PRO 41 T, Santee S,a' n D[ego "i,xv"t III �1, A 1/`,,,j),1m1, -0,"AIj X f AAA111- j El Cajon miw dot", 6 0 AjAl OF I M Wsa 1,f, g Poverty Concentration Areas r.o, e a-13.3%Pove rt Y '0I 13.4%,-26.8%Pavet ty 26,'9%, Poverty '71 RECAPs 't i,6,6,a I ............ Areas of Roverty Cn ki My Bouni,dary Corona b Chula'Vista K�ily Boundaries N IL commiuni,,ty Boundaries .......... Imperial 0 1.25 25 1 miles Beach 'A .......... ...........1, 2 DRAW YAP A W", N Sources,"Esht,'U 3 G-'S,,,.,N0A,A,Sources,Esri,Garmiin,,US,fols',NPS ......................... F�L 65 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 296 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 1'11("')UJ 0"U, sil"19 P'1'1�ofil.e A discussion of fair housing choice must include an asses,sment of the housing market being analyzed. This section provides an overview of the characteristics of the local and regional housing markets. The Census Bureau defines a housing unit as a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room that is, occupied (or,if vacant,is intended for occupancy) as separate living quarters, Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live separately from any other individuals in the building and which have direct access from outside the building or through a common hall. 10 Housing Growth Housing data reveals that the San Diego County housing stock increased by almost five percent between 2010 and 2019 (Table 32), the most recent Census data available and the most current housing estimates available. This growth rate is lower than the preceding decade where housing growth increased by almost 12 percent from 2000 to 2010. Among jurisdictions in the county, the City of San Marcos continued to experience the largest housing growth (12.2 percent) followed by Chula Vista (7.7 percent) and San Diego (5.9 percent). These housing growth rates are small compared to those between 2000 and 2010, where the highest rates ranged from 52 to 32 percent.In the last decade,most jurisdictions in the county experienced housing growth of less than five percent. SANDAG growth forecasts estimate that by 2035, the county's housing stock will increase by 14.4 percent.The cities of National City, Chula Vista,and San Diego are expected to see housing stock growth that in excess of 15 percent (20.9 percent, 18.3 percent, and 17.4 percent, respectively). The estimated population growth for the county is expected to exceed production marginally (growth from 3.4 to 3.9 million, 15 percent) Inability to produce enough housing units to accommodate growth in the number of households will reduce vacancy rates, could drive up market prices, increase the incidence of overcrowding. "0" A 66 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 297 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Table 32: Housing Unit Growth jurisdiction #of Units #of Units %Change Projected %Change 2010 2019 2010 to 2019 2035 2019,-2035 Urban County Coronado 9)634 9.1740 1.1% 9.1697 -0.4% Del Mar 2)596 2.1625 1.1% 2.1653 1.1% Imperial Beach 9)882 101074 1.9% 101926 8.5% Lemon Grove 81868 9)114 2.80/() 9)654 5.90/o Poway 16)�715 16)�917 1.20/() 1705 4.5% Solana Beach 61540 6�)569 0.40/() 6)833 4.0% Unincorporatcd 173��756 178��844 2.90/() 209)506 17.1% Total Urban County 227)991 233)88:31_ 2.6%1 266,9541_ 14.1% Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 44)673 47)080 5.4% 50)261 6.8% Chula Vista 79)416 85)535 7.7% 101.1188 18.3% F.I Cajon 35)1850 36)1148 0.8% 38J63 5.6%1 F.ncinttas 25)1740 26)1495 2.9% 26�)76�5 1.0% F.sconclido 48)1044 48)1833 1.6% 55)633 13.9�% La Mesa 26)1167 26)1869 2.7% 30)0�01 11.7% National City 16)762 17)264 3.0% 20)877 20.9% Oceanside 64)435 65)902 2.3% 70)395 6.8% San Diego 515)275 545)645 5.9% 640.1668 17.4% San Marcos 28)641 32)126 12.2% 35)795 11.4% Santee 20,1048 21,1100 5.2% 221776 7.9 010 Vista 30,1986, 32,1580 5.1% 35,3307 8.4% Total County 1)164)0281 1)219)4601 4.8% 1)394)7831 14.4% Sources:Bureau of the Census,2010 Census;SANDAG Series 13 Regional Growth Forecast;California Department of Finance Housing Estimates(E5),2019. 2. Housing Type A region's housing stock generally includes three categories: single-family dwelling units, multi-family dwelling units,and other types of units such as mobile homes. Single-family units are attached or detached dwelling units usually on individual lots of land. As shown in Table 33, approximately 60 percent of the housing units in the county are single-family dwellings. The cities of Del Mar, Lemon Grove, Poway, Carlsbad and Encinitas, as well as the unincorporated county areas, have a much larger proportion of this housing unit type (over 70 percent), while El Cajon and Imperial Beach have a much lower proportion (less than 50 percent). "01, A 67 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 298 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 1'7A1R Table 33: Housing Stock Mix 2019 jurisdiction Single Family Units Multi-Family Units Mobile Detached Attached Total 2-4 Units 5+Units Total Homes Urban County Coronado 45.7-Yo 10.70/() 56,.40/() 6.8% 36.80/() 43.5Yo 0.0% Del Mar 51.6(-Yo 19.70/() 71.30/() 7.7% 21.10/() 28.7Yo 0.0% Imperial Beach 3 9.1'Yo 7.61Y01 46,.70/() 12.3% 37.90/() 5 0.1% 3.2% Lemon Grove 65.9(-Yo 8.71Y01 74.60/() 7.3% 17.20/() 24.5Yo 0.9% Poway 75.1'Yo 4.1% 79.1% 2.4% 13.6% 16.0% 4.9% Solana Beach 47.8% 19.4% 67.2% 6.2% 26.4'Yo 32.6% 0.2% Unincorporated 68.6'Yo 5.9% 74.5% 4.6% 12.4% 17.1% 8.4% Total Urban County 66.0% 6.7'Yo 72.6'Vo 5.1(Vo 15.3% 20.41)/o 7.0% Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 53.10/() 16�.9% 70.0% 5.5% 21.8% 27.2% 2.7'V(,.) Chula Vista 53.50/() 9.8%� 63.4% 5.9% 26�.01% 31.9% 4.8'V(,.) ...1 lCajon 41.10/() 4.9%� 46�.0% 7.8% 40.8% 48.7% 5.3'V(,.) Encinitas 58.1% 18.7% 76.8% 6.8% 13.8% 20.6% 2.6'Yo Escondido 50.8% 6.1(Yo 56.9% 6.8% 28.5% 35.3% 7.7% La Mesa 46.9% 6.0(Yo 52.9% 9.0(V() 37.4% 46.5% 0.7% National City 43.3% 9.4(Yo 52.7% 9.2% 35.6% 44.8'Vo 2.5% Oceanside 52.50/() 11.5% 64.0% 8.8% 22.2% 31.0% 5.01V(.) San Diego 44.30/() 8.6%� 52.9% 8.3% 37.6% 45.8% 1.2'V(,.) San Marcos 51.10/() 6.9%� 58.0% 3.9% 27.8% 31.6% 10.4% Santee 55.6% 9.1% 64.80/o 5.9% 18.2% 24.1% 11.1% Vista 49.3'!/o 7.4% 56�.8% 7.2% 30.3 37.4�0 5.8(Vo Total County 50.9% 8.7% 59.6% 7.2% 29.4% 36.6% 3.8�% L� WWWWWWWWMJ Source:California Department of Finance,Population and Housing Estimates(E5),2�019. I Tenure and Vacancy Housing tenure describes the arrangement by which a household occupies a housing unit;that is,whether a housing unit is owner-occupied or renter-occupied. Tenure preferences are primarily related to household income, composition, and age of the resident. Communities need to have an adequate supply of units available both for rent and for sale in order to accommodate a range of households with varying incomes) family sizes, composition, lifestyles, etc. A person and households may face different housing issues in the rental housing market versus the for-sale housing market. Residential stability is also influenced by tenure with ownership housing resulting in a much lower turnover rate than rental housing. As seen in Table 34, San Diego County has a higher proportion of owner-occupied housing (53 percent) than renter-occupied housing (47 percent). The ownership level fell by 1.4 percent between 2010 and 2017, but was still below the national level of 63.8 percent and slightly lower than the 54.5 percent State figure for housing ownership. However, ownership rates decreased at all levels between 2010 and 2017. Half of the Jurisdictions in the county had more owner-occupied housing units than renter-occupied units. "01' A 68 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 299 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR Exceptions include Coronado, Imperial Beach, El Cajon, Escondido, La Mesa, National City, San Diego, and Vista. The tenure distribution in Coronado, Imperial Beach, and National City may be attributed to the large proportion of military families in those cities living off base due to the lack of, or demand for, housing and the close proximity of the cities to military bases.The large proportion of renters in El Cajon is partially explained by the large amount of multi-family housing in the City. Table 34: Housl*ng Tenure and Vacancy Percent Percent Vacancy jurisdiction �Owner- Renter- Rate Occupied ccupied Urban County Coronado 49.2% 50.8% 26.8% Del Mar 53.40/() 46.60/() 31.60/() Imperial Beach 31.80/() 68.20/() 14.30/6 Lemon Grove 54.10/() 45.90/() 5.4% Poway 74.4% 25.6% 4.1(Vo Solana Beach 58.6% 41.4% 16.0% Unincorporated 67.6% 32.4% 9.1(V() Total Urban County 64.9% 35.1(Vo 9.9(V() Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 65.00/() 35.00/() 8.9% Chula Vista 58.00/() 42.00/() 8.9% El Cajon 38.20/() 61.80/() 3.1% Encinitas 63.8% 36.2% 8.4% Escondido 49.8()/o 50�.2% 4.5% La Mesa 41.69/6 58.4% 6.4% National City 3 2.1 67.9% 7.1% Oceanside 56.0% 44.0% 7.6% San Die,()'o 46.8% 53.2% 7.4% San Marcos 61.3% 38.7% 4.5% Santee 69.0% 31.0% 4.3% Vista 49.2% 50�.8% 3.6% Total County 65.0% 35.0% 8.9% Sources:American Community Survey,2,013-2017. 'Z 69 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 300 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F7A1R I'll(AIJ SUl',,,�('; A 1 JtV 40 lenure by Income and Race/Ethn*C*-, A substantial income and housing disparity exists between owner- and renter-households. Table 35 indicates that San Diego County renters are more likely to be lower and moderate income and are more likely to experience housing problems such as cost burden and substandard housing conditions. The county's tenure distribution also has a racial and ethnic component as many ethnic minority populations in San Diego County have not achieved housing homeownership as readily as the White population. In fact as of 2017, the majority of owner-occupied households were White (Figure 9). Of those who owned the housing units they occupied, 64 percent were White; 18 percent were Hispanic; three percent were Black; and 11 percent were Asian/Pacific Islanders. Comparing these figures to race data from the 2,013-20�17 ACS demonstrates that minorities in the county are underrepresented in terms of homeownership. For comparison purposes, according to 2013-2017 ACS data,Whites are 46 percent of the county population, Hispanics are 33 percent,while 12 percent are Asian/Pacific Islander and only five percent of the population was Black. Table 35: Housing Problems by Tenure Percent of All Percent Low Percent with Percent with Tenure Households and Moderate Housing Cost Burden Income Problems (>30%) Renters 47.30/() 61.40/() 56.80/() 51.9�% Owners 52.70/() 31.40/() 35.10/() 33.1% Total Households 100.0% 45.6% 4 5.4 OVo 42.0% Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affi),rdability Strategy(CHAS)Data,2012-2016. Figure 9: Race of Homeowner 2010 2017 Hispaiuc or Hisparuc or Latino,l Ladno,,17.6% Asian/M.1 10.49j�la Asiaii/Pl,, `7 Amer. White Alone, White Indian/Ala-ska !]P� Amer. 63.9% Native 0.611JI-10 70.5% Indian/Alaska Native,,0.511?0 89/6 Black,,3.0% Black,2. Sources:American Community Survq(I-year estimates),2010,2017. `2 M�111VT 1� �11111111�11 N"I 1, 1; 70 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 301 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ 0"U,sil"t ItIol"), 9 con''d Assessing housing conditions in San Diego County can provide the basis for developing policies and programs to maintain and preserve the quality of the housing stock. Housing age can indicate general housing conditions within a community. Housing is subj�ect to gradual deterioration over time. Deteriorating housing can depress neighboring property values, discourage reinvestment, and impact the quality of life in a neighborhood. State and federal housing programs typically consider the age of a community's housing stock when estimating rehabilitation needs. In general,most homes begin to require major repairs or have significant rehabilitation needs at 30 or 40 years of age. Furthermore, housing units constructed prior to 1979 are more likely to contain lead-based paint. The housing stock in the San Diego region is older,with a majority of the housing units (54 percent) built before 1979 and is at least 40 years old (Table 3�6). The highest percentages of pre-1980 housing units are generally found in the older, urbanized neighborhoods of the cities of La Mesa, Lemon Grove, El Cajon, San Diego,Coronado and National City and will most likely have the largest proportions of housing units potentially in need of rehabilitation. Home rehabilitation can be an obstacle for senior homeowners with fixed incomes and mobility issues. 10 Lead-Based Paint Hazard Housing age is a key variable used to estimate the number of housing units with lead-based paint (LBP). Lead based-paint was banned in the United States in 1978. Residences constructed before 1978 may have lead-based paint hazards. AccordinLr to the federal Centers for Disease Control (CD�C)�, approximately 250�,00�O children aged one to five years in the United States have elevated levels of lead in their blood. High blood lead levels are a concern because they may be harmful to a child's developing organ systems such as the kidneys, brain, liver, and blood-forming tissues, potentially affecting a child's ability to learn. Very high blood lead levels can cause devastating health consequences,including seizures,coma,and even death. Children are much more vulnerable to lead poisoning than adults because children tend to put items into their mouths and some of these items may contain lead paint. In addition, their bodies absorb up to 40 percent of the lead with which they come into contact, as opposed to only ten percent absorbed by adults. Lead can enter the body through breathing or ingestion. Several factors contribute to higher incidence of lead poisoning: • All children under the age of six years old are at higher risk. • Children living at or below the poverty line are at a higher risk. • Children in older housing are at higher risk. • Children of some racial and ethnic groups and those living in older housing are at disproportionately higher risk. According to the County Health and Human Services Agency,between 2013 and 2017,273 cases of lead- poisoning (Blood Lead Level > 9.5 mcg/dL or greater) among children under 21 years of age were recorded. This figure is an increase from the reported 104 cases between 2009 and 2013. However, the increase may be due to changes in the reporting threshold from 14.4mcg/dL to 9.5mcg/dL. "01, A 71 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 302 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR Table 36: Housing ALye and Lead-Poisoning Cases C7 Lead junisdiction Built 1960- Built 1940- Built Before Median Poisoning 1,979 11959 1940 Year Built Cases 2009-2013 Urban County Coronado 38.00/() 19.30/() 15.10/() 1972 - Del Mar 53.3% 18.7% 3.1% 1971 - Imperial Beach 40.9% 30.0% 2.5% 1970 - 1,emon Grove 34.7% 40.8% 4.9% 1963 - Poway 48.0% 7.0% 0.9% 1978 - Solana Beach 54.60/() 12.40/() 2.50/() 1976 - Unincorporated 34.7% 10.4% 2.6% - 5- Total Urban County 36�.9% 12.7% 3.2% 1 - 5 Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 26.3% 4.6(Vo 1.1% 1987 2 Chula Vista 28.5% 16.4% 1.4% 1983 6 El Cajon 45.3% 23.4% 1.1% 1973 8 Encinitas 42.0% 10.4% 3.3% 1978 2 Escondido 38.3% 7.4%� 2.3% 1981 6 f,a Mesa 41.1% 30.6% 5.0 O/o 1969 1 National City 36�.8% 25.3% 8.0�O/o 1970 3 Oceanside 33.2% 7.5%� 1.4% 1983 9 San Diego 34.2% 16.7% 6.9% 1976 4 San Marcos 26�.8% 2.8% 0.7(Yo 1990 6 Santee 52.0% 8.4% 0.8(Yo 1977 - Vista 33.5% 8.2% 1.6(Yo 1982 7 Total County 34.9% 14.3% 4.4% 1978 1 Note:Lead poisoning cases refer to children under 21 years of age with a venous BLL 14.5 ug/dL or�,xreater. k' Sources:American Community Survey(ACS),2009�-2013;County of San Diego Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program(CLPPP)Epidemiology-&Immunization Services,Public Health Services,2014. 'Z M�'Vf U [1 N, ?I? i"1, 1; 72 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 303 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FT`S']1'(�)I f7kM H1(")UJ Figure 10: Childhood Lead Poisoning Risk Areas 1�0 A Ir r a wg e Y� 'W7 �07'am, �a 'M AS MV/'Ell", 7m/p J01, 010 _7 Ir Alp r 'k 711 lsbad,J ................. E, inj ais" :d ROYXho 11�0ara J0, Solana Bea&.1, De I M a r"11, Childhood Lead Poisoning Risk Areas L San Di� ...... High Risk 77: S e, Very High Risk A 1, 1` N, Pinle,Vw��j Based on the%of(a m ifies befow 0 4o)", th e po verty,level,#o f res iden tia I El ,structures buiftprior to 1980,and popuja tion<5 years,Of age, rno" morbin �N�' Idna Freeways, County Boundary Imperia City Boundaries Beach U "I :--N Community Bowidades "01, 73 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 304 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ I it 171. 1-lauslit"19 Co&t an(�11 Afford.a]A. 61Y This section evaluates the affordability of the housing stocx in -)an Diego County to low and moderate income households. If housing costs are relatively high in comparison to household income, a correspondingly high rate of housing problems occurs. It is important to emphasize that housing affordability alone is not a fair housing issue. However, fair housing concerns may arise when housing affordability interacts with other factors covered under the fair housing laws, such as household type, composition, and race/ethnicity. 10 Housing Cost Every year,the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) tracks the ability of households to afford a home in metropolitan areas across the country. NAHB develops a Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) for a given area that is defined as the share of homes sold in that area that would have been affordable to a family earning that area's median income. The nation's 10 least affordable metro areas in 2019 were located in California. The San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is one of the least affordable areas in the nation ranking as the sixth least affordable region in the United States. In 2019 (Third Quarter), only 20 percent of the homes sold in the San Diego MSA were affordable to a family earning the area's median income. Figure 11 shows that affordability for the region peaked in 2012 during the recession and has dropped considerably since then. Figure 11: Housing Opportunity Index Trend (2010-2019) 70 Q1_12,61.3 60 50 40 30 Q3_191 20.1 20 10 0 C�/ C�/ C�/ C�/ C�/ C��/ C�/ C�/ C�/ C��/ C�/ Note: Housing Opportunity Index represents the percentage of homes sold that were affordable to families earning the median income during the respective quarter. Housing Opportunity Index:Complete History by M tropolitan Source:National Association ofHome Builders rhe NAHB/Wells Farg e Area(2012-Current). "01, A 74 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 305 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ According to HUD's 2012-2016 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) data,close to 20 percent of households in San Diego County paid more than half their income on housing. As cost of living is consistently on the rise, housing affordability drops, and lower-income families are most acutely affected. The California Housing Partnership (CHPC) estimates that the county's lowest-income renters spend 69 percent of their income on rent." The CHPC estimated that in 2018, renters needed to earn $38.31/hr (three times the minimum wage) to afford the median monthly asking rate of$1,992. Rents increase in response to demand and more renter households have entered the San Diego market since 2006, many because of displacement during the foreclosure crisis. Table 37 displays median home sale prices for each jurisdiction in San Diego County.For 2019�,the median sales price for homes in San Diego County was $594,909, an increase of 38 percent from 20�14. Home prices vary by area/j uri s diction, with very high median prices in coastal areas such as the cities of Coronado, Del Mar, and Solana Beach. Imperial Beach and Lemon Grove had the lowest median sales price in the region. Table 37: Median Home Sale Prices by jurisdiction Co�unty/City/Area #Sold #Sold Median Price Median Price %Change Nov.20�14 Nov.2019 Nov.20�14 Nov.20�19 2014-2019, Urban County Coronado 13 42 $1�059�500 $1 X0�000 71.8% Del Mar 23 13 $1�249�000 $1�675�000 34.1% Imperial Beach 8 17 $4275000 $5305000 24.1% Lemon Grove 24 19 $3315750 $4905000 47.7% Poway 35 46 $5583409 $6773000 21.2% Solana Beach 24 14 $1 X23500 $1�2003000 17.4% Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 121 13 $6875500 $8595000 24.9�0 Chula Vista 214 282 $4055000 $5355000 32.1% El Cajon 116 165 $3�655000 $5235000 43�.3% Encinitas' 60 57 $7685000 $9�925000 29�.2% Escondido 117 182 $3�945000 $5805000 47.2% La Mesa 69 76 $4175000 $5495000 31.7�0 National City 16 14 $2775500 $4465000 60.7�0 Oceanside 164 196 $3925500 $5495000 39.9(yo San Diego 1023 1.1180 $4395500 $6255000 422,yo Santee 81 110 $3�505000 $6225500 51.7% Vista 53 78 $420)000 $531)000 34.5% San Diegro County 83 102 $430,000 $565 38.4% C7 1 1 1 1000 Note:1.Does not include Card i ff-by-the-Sea sales data. Sources:DQNews.com,California Home Sale Activity by City,November 2014;CoreLogic,California Home Sale Activity by City,November 2019.Accessed January 30,2020. 27 California Housing Partnership Corporation. "San Diego County Report: San Diego County's Housing Emergency and Proposed Solutions." (May 2018). "01, A 75 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 306 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 1'7A1R The San Diego County Apartment Association (SDCA A I publishes average rental rates biannually. Table 38 displays, the average rent by jurisdiction on Fall 2014 and Fall 2018, providing a reasonable five-year timeframe to capture the change in rental rates. The estimated average rental costs in San Diego County increased by an average of 33 percent.The percent increase in rent between 2014 and 2018 was 34 percent for a studio, 47 percent for a one-bedroom, 28 percent for a two-bedroom, and 22 percent for a three- bedroom unit. Among communities with data for one- two- and three-bedroom units Imperial Beach C) had the lowest average rents in the region and highest rents were observed in Del Mar and Solana Beach. C) Table 38,: Average Rental Rates by jurisdiction- Fall 2018 jurisdiction/Area Unit Type Average Monthly Rent %Change Fall 2014* Fall 2018 Urban County Studio N/A N/A N/A 1 Bedroom $13,25 $1404 6.0'Y(,.) Coronado 2 Bedrooms $1200 $1700 41.7% 3+Bedrooms $23,08 N/A N/A Studio $1526 N/A N/A 1 Bedroom $1564 $2338 49.5% Del Mar 2 Bedrooms $;1894 $2806 48.2% 3+Bedrooms $2�300 $21650 15.2% Studio $9�25 N/A N/A 1 Bedroom 517 83.9% $825 $11 Imperial Beach 2 Bedrooms 635 $1 500 -8.3'Yo $1 3+Bedrooms $1�988 $11683 15.3% Studio $762 $891 16.9�0 I Bedroom $864 $15030 19�.2% Lemon Grove 2 Bedrooms $1 102 $15282 16.3% 5 3+Bedrooms $1475 N/A N/�A Studio $1012 N/A N/�A 1 Bedroom $1245 N/A N/�A Poway 2 Bedrooms $1325 N/A N/�A 3+Bedrooms $1 M2 $2)350 27.6�0 Studio $900 N/A N/A 1 Bedroom $1�656 $2)043 23.4�0 Solana Beach 2 Bedrooms $1�967 $2)391 21.6�0 3+Bedrooms $2310 $2)770 19.9% Entitlement jurisdictions, Studio $911 $11099 20.6% 1 Bedroom 168 $1457 24.7% $1 Carlsbad 2 Bedrooms $1�557 $21685 72.4% 3+ Bedrooms 525 N/A NJA $4� "01' A 76 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 307 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL Table 38,: Average Rental Rates by jurisdiction- Fall 2018 jurisdiction/Area Unit Type Average Monthly Rent %�change Fall 2014* Fall 2018 Studio $720 $1)210 68.1% 1 Bedroom $9�70 $1)539 58.7% Chula Vista 2 Bedrooms $1�354 $1)850 36.6Yo 3+Bedrooms $1�566 $2)299 46.8Yo Studio $693 $752 8.5% 1 Bedroom $1�149 $1)742 51.6% El Cajon 2 Bedrooms $1�069 $1)728 61.6% 3+Bedrooms $1�557 $2)185 40.3% Studio $1�362 N/A N/A 1 Bedroom $1�233 $11295 5-01yo Encinitas 2 Bedrooms 654 $2145 29.7% $1 )o 3+Bedrooms 150 36.5'/ $1�575 $21 Studio N/A N/A N/A )o 1 Bedroom 462 97.81/ $739 $11 Escondido 2 Bedrooms $1 116 $1728 54.8% $1 3+Bedrooms _J $1784 28.1% Studio $875 $1 168 33.5% 1 Bedroom $1075 $1 568 45.9% La Mesa 2 Bedrooms $1467 $1 X8 34.2% 3+Bedrooms $1875 $2397 27.8% Studio $675 N/A N/A 1 Bedroom $809 N/A N/A National City 2 Bedrooms $9�69 $1)075 10.9�0 3+Bedrooms N/A $1)900 N/A Studio $9�22 $1)620 75.7�0 1 Bedroom $1 J 06 $1)503 35.9�0 Oceanside 2 Bedrooms $2217 $15774 -20.0% 5 3+Bedrooms $2018 $25195 8.8% Studio $824 $15433 73�.9% 1 Bedroom $1075 $15825 69�.8% San Diego 2 Bedrooms $1496 $25172 45.2% 3+ Bedrooms 892 $2637 39.4% $1 Studio N/A N/A N/A 1 Bedroom 021 0.8% $1�01 3 $1) San Marcos 2 Bedrooms 267 N/A N/A $1 3+Bedrooms N/A $1,650 N/A 'Z M�111YT 1���11111111�I"I N, I F,� 77 2020-06-23 Agenda Pack-et, Page 308 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 1'7A1R Table 38,: Average Rental Rates by jurisdiction- Fall 2018 jurisdiction/Area Unit Type Average Monthly Rent %�change Fall 2014* Fall 2018 A Studio $900 N/ N/.A 1 Bedroom K012 $1)599 58.0% Santee 2 Bedrooms $1�568 $1)740 11.0% 3+Bedrooms $2�763 $1)737 -37.1'Yo Studio $674 $1)313 94.8Yo 1 Bedroom $1�016 $1)636 6 1.O'Yo Vista 2 Bedrooms $1�257 $1)863 48.2Yo 3+Bedrooms $1�326 $2)493 88.0'Yo Studio 085 33.6% $812 $11 San Diego County 1 Bedroom 066 $1564 46.7'Vo $1 2 Bedrooms $1�463 $11873 28.0% 3+Bedrooms $1�813 $21218T 22.3% Note:Fall 2014 average rents were not available for studio units in Del Mar,Imperial Beach,Poway,and Solana Beach and 3+bedroom units in Coronado.Spring 2014 average rents are used for thosevalues. Fall 2018 average rents not available for studios in Encinitas,Escondido,National City,San Marcos,and Santee. Fall 2018 average rent was also not available for one-bedroom units in National City. Source:San Diego County Apartment Association.Vacancy and Rental.Rate Survey,Fall 2018 and Spring 2019. I Housine-u-1 Affordability 9 Housing affordability can be inferred by comparing the cost of renting or owning a home in a community with the maximum affordable housing costs for households at different income levels. Taken together, this information can generally show who can afford what size and type of housing and indicate the type of households most likely to experience overcrowding and overpayment.While housing affordability alone is not a fair housing issue,fair housing concerns may arise when housing affordability interacts with factors covered under the fair housing laws, such as household type, composition, and race/ethnicity. HUD conducts annual household income surveys nationwide to determine a household's eligibility for federal housing assistance. Households in the lower end of each income category can afford less by comparison than those at the upper end. Table 39 shows the annual household income by household size and the maximum affordable housing payment based on the standard of 30 to 35 percent of household income. Also shown are general cost assumptions for utilities, taxes, and property insurance. The countywide median home sales price in 2019 ($594,909) places home ownership out of reach for all low- and moderate-income households. When homeownership is out of reach, rental housing is the only viable option for many low-income persons. Based on the rental data presented in Table 3,8, none of jurisdictions had a rents within the range of affordability for lower-income families. Table 3,9 shows that extremely low-income households cannot afford rents in any part of the county. Larger, low-income households can afford some of the studio and one-bedroom rental units but those would be inadequate to house a large family. Moderate-income households have a few more options for rentals but again, large households may encounter difficulty 'Z 78 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 309 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ finding adequately sized units. The situation is, most difficult for seniors with fixed incomes. When the housing market is tight,with high demand,low vacancies,and rising costs,the potential for discriminatory housing practices also increases. Table 39: Housing Affordability Matrix - San Diego County (2019) Income Annual Affordable Payment Housing Costs Maximum Affordable Price Group Income Taxes& Rental Limits Renter Owner Utilities Insurance (per month) Home (Owne (purchase price Extremely Low(0-30%AMI) 1-Person $221500 $563 $563 $160 $197 $403 $471856 2-Person $251700 $643 $643 $201 $225 $442 $501416 3-Person $281900 $723 $723 $241 $253 $482 $531209 4-Person $321100 $803 $803 $283 $281 $520 $551536 5-Person $341700 $868 $868 $345 $304 $429 $501940 Low(31-50%AMI) 1-Person $37)450 $936 $936 $160 $328 $776 $104139�6 2-Person $42)800 $1�070 $1�070 $201 $375 $869 $1151087 3-Person $48)150 $1�204 $1�204 $241 $421 $963 $1261011 4-Person $53)500 $1�338 $1�338 $283 $468 $1,055 $1361470 5-Person $57)800 $1445 $1445 $345 $506 $1,006 $1381303 Moderate(51-80%AMI) 1-Person $591950 $906 $11057 $160 $370 $746 $122,689 2-Person $681500 $11036 $11208 $201 $423 $835 $135)994 3-Person $77,050 $11165 $11359 $241 $476 $9�24 $149,531 4-Person $85,600 $11295 $11510 $283 $529 K012 $162)603 5-Person $92,450 $11398 $116�31 $345 $571 $1�053 $166451 Middle/Upper(80-120%AMI) 1-Person $72,500 $11)6�61 $11)938 $160 $678 $15501 $255�962 2-Person $82,850 $11)899 $21)215 $201 $775 $15698 $288)305 3-Person $9-3 200 $2 136 $2492 $241 $872 $1 895 $320881 4-Person $103)550 $21)373 $21)769 $283 $969 $25090 $352)992 5-Person $111)850 $21)563 $21)990 $345 $15047 $25218 $3'72)071 Assumptions:California Department of Housing and Community Development 2018 income limits;30-35%gross household income as affordable housing co,sts(depending on tenure and income level);35%of monthly affordable cost for taxes and insurance;5%down- payment,4%interest rate for a 30-year fixed rate mortgage loan;utilities based on the Housing Authority of the County of San Diego's Allowances for'renant-Furni shed Utilities and Other Services,July 2019.Assumed Natural Gas. Methodolog,y:Affordable housing costs in this table are calculated based on California Health.and Safety Code definitions,which.generally result in lower affordable housing costs. Sources:California Department of Housing and Community Development,2019;Housing Authority of the County of San Diego,2019. ? 79 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 310 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 1'11("')UJ 1�1011)..te. ...... 11,19 '1" 111111"I's 1, Overcrowding '-rm'�,�rchkig Def"'Clied"? Some households may not be able to accommodate high cost According to State and federal guidelines, burdens fo�r housing but may instead accept smaller housing or overcrowding is defined as a unit with more reside with other individuals or families, in the same home. than one person per room,including dining Potential fair housing issues emerge if non-traditional and living rooms but excluding bathrooms, households are discouraged or denied housing due to a kitchens.,hallways,and porches. Severe overcrowding is defined as households with perception of overcrowding. Household overcrowding is more than 1.5 persons per room. reflective of various living situations: (1) a family lives in a home that is too small; (2) a family chooses to house extended family members; or (3) unrelated individuals or families are doubling 10, up to afford housing. However, cultural differences also StI,"trid,"Ird contribute to the overcrowded conditions since some cultures Overcrowd,inL)-thresholds only describe how tend to have a larger household size than others due to the a unit is occu C)ied but by no means preference of living with extended family members. Not only is P represent the maximum occupancy standard overcrowding a potential fair housing concern,it can potentially of a unit.In general,there are no occupancy strain physical facilities and the delivery of public services, standards except for those established in the reduce the quality of the physical environment, contribute to a building codes. Occupancy standards are shortage of parking, and accelerate the deterioration of homes. discussed later in Chapter 5:Public Policies,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,J As a result'. some landlords or apartment managers may be more hesitant to rent to larger families, thus making access to adequate housing even more difficult. According to local fair housing service providers and prot)erty managers, addressing the issue of large households is complex as there are no set of guidelines for determining the maximum capacity for a unit. Fair housing issues may arise from policies aimed to limit overcrowding that have a disparate impact on specific racial or ethnic groups with higher proportion of overcrowding. For example,2013-2017 ACS data shows that seven percent of housing units in the county were overcrowded compared with 17 percent for units with a Hispanic head of household. As mentioned, approximately seven percent of all households in San Diego County were affected by overcrowding while two percent experienced severe overcrowding. The prevalence of overcrowding varies among jurisdictions, with the lowest percentage of overall overcrowding occurring in Del Mar (no overcrowded or severely overcrowded units). National City and Escondido had approximately twice the county's proportion of overcrowded units. El Cajon, Vista, and Imperial Beach also had high levels of overcrowding. These jurisdictions had high proportions of minority residents and lower median incomes as a whole as well. Table 40, also shows that overcrowding is significantly more prevalent among renter- households than among owner-households. "01' A 80 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 311 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Table 40: Overcrowding by Tenure Overcrowded Severely Overcrowded junisdiction (1+ occupants per oom) (1.5+ ccupants per room) Renter Owner Total Renter Owner Total Urban County Coronado 2.31Yo 0.6% 1.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.8% Del Mar 0.01yo 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Imperial Beach 14.1% 2.4(Y01 10.4% 4.4% 01.7% 3.2% Lemon Grove 8.50/() 4.7(Y01 6.4% 3.6% 1.5% 2.5% Poway 9.30/() 1.6(Yo, 3.6% 3.6% 01.3% 1.1% Solana Beach 1.80/() 0.8(Y(), 1.2% 1.2% 01.0% 0.5% Unincorporated 9.1 1Y0 2.5% 4.6% 3.0% 0.6% 1.4% Total Urban County 8.7% 2.4(Yo 4.6% 3.0% 0.6% 1.4% Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 3.7% 1.2(Yo 2.1(Vo 0.8(V() 0.3% 0.4% Chula Vista 17.10/() 4.4%� 9.8% 5.5% 01.9% 2.9(Y(,.) F.I Cajon 17.60/() 3.2%� 12.10/() 4.1% 01.9% 2.9(y(,.) F.ncinttas 7.10/() 1.2%� 3.4% 2.7% 01.5% 1.3(Y(,.) F.scondido 21.70/() 6.1 O/o� 14.00/() 9.3% 1.4% 5.3(Y(,.) La Mesa 6.0% 1.7(Yo 4.2% 2.7% 0.6% 1-91yo National City 17.2% 9.2(Yo 14.6% 5.7% 2.7% 4.7% Oceanside 8.6% 1.9(yo 4.8% 2.4% 0.6% 1.4% San Diego 9.5%) 2.7(Yo 6.3% 3.5% 0.7% 2.2% San Marcos 11.6�% 2.5% 6.0% 3.4% 0.8% 1.8% Santee 5.5% 1.2% 2.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% Vista 17.9% 4.1% 11.1% 6.1% 1.2% 3.7% Total County 10.8% 2.8% 6.5% 3.7% O�.7% 2.1% Source:American Community SunTey(ACS),2013-2017. 2o Housing Cost Burden State and Federal standards specify that a household experiences housing cost burden if it pays more than 30 percent of its gross income on housing-typically a point at which housing costs become burdensome and may affect the ability to comfortably make monthly rent or mortgage payments and/or maintain a decent standard of living. Housing cost burdenis typically linked to income levels. The lower the income, the larger percentage of a household's income is allotted to housing costs. Cost burden by low income households tends to occur when housing costs increase faster than income. Figure 12 shows how dramatically the housing cost burden for owner- and renter-ho�useholds is influenced by household income. As shown, as income increases the proportion of households experiencing cost burden decreases. Among the lower income groups, larger proportions of renter-households experienced housing cost burden. "01, A 81 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 312 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 1'11("')UJ Figure 12: Housing Cost Burden by Income and Tenure $751000+ $50)000-$741999 $35)000-$49,999 $20�000-$341999 11111 <$20)000 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 1 00.01yo <$201000 $20)000-$34)99�9 $35,)000-$495999$50,000-$741)999 $75,)000+ 1111 Owner 81.0% 61.4% 56.40/6 50.8% 18.811/0 Renter 91.8% 93.1% 77.80/() 50.9% 13.811/0 Source:American Community Survey(ACS),2013-2017. About 42 percent of county households experienced cost burden per the 2012-2016 CHAS (Table 41). A higher provortion of renter-occupied households experienced cost burden (52 percent) compared with owner-occupied households (33 percent). Carlsbad, Del Mar, Encinitas Poway, San D�iego�, Santee, and Carlsbad were the only jurisdictions in the region where less than 50 percent of renters were cost burdened. Approximately two-thirds (69 percent) of lower and moderate-income households experienced cost burden, and 40 percent experienced a severe cost burden. M�111 Q"J'ItN,ly"'r 111'�' VTU�"�rr% 11 1101F`11 82 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 313 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 11(")IJ Table 41: Housing Cost Burden by Tenure Owner- Renter- jurisdiction Occupied Occupied All Households Households Households Urban County Coronado 37.5% 51.9% 44.9% Del Mar 38.1% 42.3% 40.0% Imperial Beach 31.4% 53.5% 46.7% Lemon Grove 33.1% 57.01)/o 43.9% Poway 29.5% 45.30/() 33.7% Solana Beach 26.6% 48.50/() 35.8% Unincorporated 35.9% 55.60/() 42.3% Total Urban County 35.00/() 54.3% 41.8% Entitlement Cities ('-'.arlsbad 28.6% 46.4% 35.0% ('-'.hula Vista 36.6% 55.9% 44.7% El Cajon 31.6% 57.7% 47.7% Encinitas 30.90/() 47.7% 36.9% Escondido 33.50/() 57.9% 46.0% La Mesa 30.60/() 51.9% 43.1% National City 32.80/() 57.4% 49.5% Oceanside 33.4% 5 5.1% 42.9% San DieLro 31.8% 49.5% 41.3% C7) San Marcos 35.3% 53.2% 42.4')/o Santee 3 2.1 /0 4 7.4 VC) 36.7�0 Vista 34.6�% 53.2% 44.3% San Diego County 33.1% 51.8% �42.0% Source:HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Stratepi(CHAS)Data,2012-2016 Estimates `2 M�'Yf U [1 N/ ?I? i"1, 1; 83 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 314 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ I S J P1111:1" licly� A,ssi&ted 1`110`L The availability and location of public and affordable housing may be a fair housing concern. If such housing is co�ncentrated in one area of a community or a region, a household seeking affordable housing is restricted to choices within a limited geographic area. Public/afford able housing and housing assistance must be accessible to qualified households regardless of race/ethnicity, disability, or other special characteristics. 10 Public Housing Hou Authorl'tv of the CountjE oimn Dieeo (HACSD) 61n�� - Two housing authorities in the San Diego region own and o�perate public housing units (Figure 13 on page 91) — the Housing Authority of the County of San Diego (HACSD) and the San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC). HACSD owns and administers public housing rental complexes (121 units), all of which are located in the Cityof Chula Vista. Eligible residents must be a senior (62 years of age or older), a disabled individual,or a low-income family and must live in one of the jurisdictions covered by HACSD. The household's annual gross income must be at or below 50 percent of the San Diego AMI.As of August 2019) 117 households were being assisted by HACSD.As shown in Table 43,Hispanic and White-headed households make up the majority of households assisted. 0 0 -P le�'i ,San DieLro Housine Commission As federal subsidies to operate and maintain public housing began decreasing, and City-owned units became operationally restrictive and inefficient, SDHC opted out of the Conventional Public Housing Program in 2007 (which provided for the upkeep of 1,366 units). Through a landmark agreement_,the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) transferred ownership and operating authority for these units to SDHC, which then leveraged the equity in these properties to create or preserve 810 additional affordable rental housing units. SDHC now owns the converted units and operates them as rent-restricted affordable rental housing units that are available at varying ranges of affordable rents to households earning no greater than 80 percent of AMI.2' At the time of conversion from public housing to SDHC ownership, residents of the units were awarded Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, which enabled them to choose to remain in their current home or to move to another rental property that would accept Housing Choice Vouchers. Approximately half of the residents at that time moved to another unit and half remained in their existing unit. SDHC provides federal Housing Choice Voucher rental assistance to more than 15,000 low-income households. SDHC retained a small number of Public Housing units (currently 189 units). As of September 2019, 178 households were being assisted by SDHC in Public Housing units. As shown in Table 43 Hispanic-headed and White households make up the majority of households assisted in Public Housing. 28 San Diego Housing Commission, "Re-positioning of the San Diego Housing Commission's Public Housing Portfolio." Housing Authority Report(November 9�,2006). "01, A 84 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 315 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR Table 42: Public Housing Units Housing, Name Address Units Authority HACSD Towncentre Manor 434 F Street,Chula Vista,CA 91910 59 Units HACSD Melrose Manor 1678 MelroseAvenue,Chula Vista,CA 91911 24 Units HACSD 1,Street Manor 584 1,Street,Chula Vista, CA 91911 16 Units HACSD Dorothy Street Manor 778 Dorothy Street,Chula Vista,CA 91911 22 Units SDHC Otay Villas 6�49 Picador Blvd.,San Diego,,CA 92154 78 Units SDHC University Canyon North 2090 Via Las Cumbres,San Diego,CA 92111 36 units SDHC Vista Verde 351 South 33rd Street,San Diego,CA 92113 40 units C-,) , SDHC Camulos 3 2222 Camulos St.,San Diego,CA 9 2110 12 units SDHC Mason 3919 Mason St.San Diego,CA 92110 8 units SDHC 44th St 2420 44th St.San Diego,CA 92105 8 units SDHC Trojan 5385-5389 Trojan Ave.,San Diego,C.A 92115 3 units SDHC Valeta 409 5 Valeta St.San Diego,CA 92110 4 units Sources:San Diego Housing and Community Developmen August 2019,San Diego Housing Commission,September 2019. Table 43: Characteristics of Householders in Public Housing Units HACSD SDHC �Characteristics Number Number Senior/Di sabled 76 66 Small.Family 88 163 Large Family 27 15 (7) Non-I lispanic 39 76 Hispanic 77 102 White 88 118 Black 14 50 American Indian 0 4 Asian/Pacific Islander 5 8 Total Households 117 178 Note:Values represent head of household characteristics.The count of White households includes Hispanic households.Data for non- Hispanic Whites is not available.Householders may belong to more than one category.For example,a householder may be both a large family householder and Hispanic. Sources:Housing Authority of the County of San Diego,August 2019;San Diego Housing Commission,September 2019. The number of persons on the waiting list for public housing far exceeds current capacity. HACSD indicates that as of August 2019�, there were 20,136 households on the waiting list. Over 40 percent of waidisted households were Hispanic and about one quarter were Black. Households with a disabled head of household make up almost 20 percent of the waiting list. There are 76,749 households on the SDHC C_ public housing waiting list (September 2019�). Over 25 percent of SDHC waitlisted households included a disabled head of household; 36.1 percent of households are Hispanic and 28.6 percent are Black. With the extremely limited capacity and the length of tenancy,it is unlikely that the characteristics of the public housing residents would change substantially in the near future. 'Z 85 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 316 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR U1(")UJ SUl',,,�('; Table 44: Characteristics of Public Housing Waiting list (Households) HACSD SD�HC Char acterl's ti'c S Number Percent Number Percent Senior 2)225 11.0% 7.1612 9�.9% Disabled 31987 19.8% M743 25.7% Family 10)454 51.9% 38�302 49.9% Non-Hispanic 11)699 58.1% 44�595 58.1% Hispanic 81365 41.5% 27�678 3 6.1% White 12)865 63.9% 39il2l 51.0% Black. 4)710 23.4% 211948 28.6% American Indian 465 2.3% 1.1599 2.1% Asian/Pacific Islander 1)581 7.9% 4)871 6.3% Total 20J36 100.0% 76)749 100.0% Note:Values represent head of household characteristics.The count of White households includes Hispanic households.Data for non- Hispanic Whitesis not available. Sources:Housing Authority(if the County of San Diego,August 2019;San Diego Housing Commission,September,2019. I Housing Choice Vouchers Program The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program is a rent subsidy program that helps low-income families and seniors pay rents of private units. HCV tenants pay approximately 30 percent of their income for rent,and the local housing authority pays the difference up to the payment standard established by the housing authority. The program offers low-income households the opportunity to obtain affordable, privately owned rental housing and to increase their housing choices. The owner's asking price must be supported by comparable rents in the area. The program participant pays any amount in the excess of the Payment standard. Six Housing Authorities administer the HCV program for San Diego County residents: • Housing Authority of the City of Carlsbad administered 475 HCVs as of February 2020�.There are 401 households on the waiting list. The waitlist is closed as of April 2020. • Housing Authority of the City of Encinitas administered 97 vouchers as of February 2020. There are 956 households on the waitinL)-list. The waitlist is open as of April 2020. C? • Housing Authority of the City of National City administered 1,123 vouchers as of September 2019. There are 3,458 households on the waiting Est. The waitlist is open as of April 2020. • Housing Authority of the City of Oceanside 1,539 vouchers as of February 2020. There are 5,532 households on the waiting list. The waitlist is open as of April 2020. • San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC, City of San Diego) administered 15,591 vouchers as of September 20�19. There are 98,,376 households on the waiting list. The waitlist is open as of C? April 20�20. • Housing Authority of the County of San Diego (HACSD) administered 9,945 vouchers as of August 2019. There are 36 337 households on the waiting list. The waitlist is indefinitely open as C? of April 2020. "01, A 86 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 317 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; As of February 2020, 29�,057 San Diego County households were receiving HCV Assistance, with 89 percent of all vouchers administered by HACSD or SDHC. Table 45 summarizes the race and ethnicity of households assisted by the HCV program. A third of the county's HCV recipients (34 percent) were Hispanic and 22 percent were Black. Senior and/or disabled households represent a significant portion of those assisted by the HCV program, making up 65 percent of all households receiving HCVs. Due to the geographic disparity in terms of rents, concentrations of voucher use have occurred (Table 46). For example, the Cit�T of El Cajon represents about three percent of the county's population but more than eight percent of the HCV use. Furthermore, 27 percent (2,656 participants) of the 9,945 vouchers administered by HACSD are concentrated in the City of El Cajon. Table 45: Housing Choice Voucher Recipients Housing Authority Total Black Hispanic White Other Senior Disabled City of Carlsbad 475 9.1'Yo 21.7% 65.1% 4.2% 50.9% 54.5% Encinitas 97 3.1'Yo 21.6% 73.2% 2.1(Vo 46.4% 27.8% City of National City 1)1 9� 5.71Yo 68.0% 82.0% 0.7% 12.2% 35.91)/0 City of Oceanside 1�539 16�.0% 34.0% 76�.01% 7.0% 11.6% 48.0% San Diego Housing 15878 28.6% 32.0% 55.3% 16.1 IVO 14.5% 47.3% Commission (SDHC) County of San Diego 9)945 16.6% 34.9% 78.8% 4.6% 39.9% 53.8% (H.ACSD) Total 2%057 22.5% 34.3% 48.2% 10.8% 15.7% 49.2% *Note:The count of White households includes Hispanic households.Data for non-Hispanic Whites is not available. Source:Area Housing Authorities 2019/2020. "01, A 87 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 318 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Table 46: Distribution of Housing Choice Voucher Recipients Ir # 1 0 ion Vo�uch %of All HCV %�county jurisaict ers, Population Urban County Coronado 18 O�.1 O/o 0.7% Del Mar 1 0.0% 0.1% Imperial Beach 404 1.3% 0.8% Lemon Grove 360 1.1% 0.8% Poway 109 0.3% 1.5% Solana Beach 17 O�.1 O/o 0.4Yol Unincorporatcd 11545 4.9% 15.40/() Total Urban County 21454 7.8% 19.80/() Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 475 1.5% 3.4% Chula Vista 2)436 7.7% 8.1% El Cajon 2)656 8.4% 3.1% Encinitas 97 0.3% 1-91yo Escondido 933 3.0% 4.6Y(,.)l La Mesa 559 1.8% 1.8Y(,.) National City 1�123 3.6% 1.9 1Y0 Oceanside 1�539 4.9% 5.3Y(,.) San Diego 15)878 50.4% 42.4% San Marcos 230 0.7% 2.9% Santee 266 0.8% 1.7%1 Vista 411 1.3% 3.0(Vo Total County 31)511 1 0,0�.0% 100.0% m I do/0 Note: ssisted households exceed allocations to a jurisdiction due to voucher use outside of originating jurisdiction.SDHC's Moving to Work flexibility and funding enable SDHC to issue a higher number of vouchers than its baseline allocation to,asstst more families.Total number of voucher use deviates slightly from Table 45 due to different timing of data processing. Also,total number of voucher use deviates slightly Sources:Area Housing Authorities 2019/2020. In 2019�,, only 14 percent of metropolitan families with children nationwide that received rent subsidies through HUD lived in low-poverty neighborhoods and only five percent lived in high-opportunity neighborhoods." To help with the de-concentration of HCV use and allow households to locate adequate housing at a location of their choice,SDHC's Moving Forward (also known as Movin)-to Work,or MTW) 9 program works to provide families with tools to assist them to move from high-po�verty neio-hborhoods to low-poverty neighborhoods. The Choice Communities Initiative (a subset of the Moving Forward program) provides families receiving federal rental assistance administered by SDHC the opportunity to live in neighborhoods in the City of San Diego that offer a broader selection of schools and employment opportunities. SDHC created the Choice Communities Initiative in 2010 and expanded it in 2018. To increase housing opportunities through this initiative and to assist as many low-income families as possible,SDHC updated the payment standards that are used to determine the amount of rental assistance 29 Mazzara,A.&Knudsen,B. Oanuary 2019).Where families with children use housing vouchers:A comparative look at the 50 largest metropolitan areas. Center on.Bu�get and Polic no �y P 'fifies,Poverty and Race Research Action Council. `2 M�'Yf U [1 N, ?I? 1, 1; 88 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 319 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; each family receives. SDHC divided City of San Diego ZIP Codes into three groups, each with its own payment standards: Choice Communities,, Enterprise Communities, and Signature Communities. Higher payment standards are set in Choice or Enterprise Communities, where rental costs would typically be higher.Famihes moving to Choice or Enterprise Communities are eligible for no-interest security deposit loans and assistance from SDHC's Mobility Counseling Program. Another important issue with the HCV program is the decreasing number of landlords willing to accept vouchers. In a tight housing market, landlords are typically able to capture high rents for the units and less likely to participate in government programs that place restrictions on rents, policies, and quality standards. Primarily in economically depressed neighborhoods, where the housing and neighborhood conditions are less than ideal'. voucher recipients are most likely to find rental units that accept voucher payments. With owners opting out in more integrated neighborhoods, tenants will be increasingly confined to low-income areas, defeating the original purpose of the program. Another issue that related to the HCV program is the amount of time it takes voucher recipients to find a unit. On average,it takes about two months for voucher recipients to find a unit after the issuance of their voucher. According to the San Diego Area Housing Commissions, approximately 70 to 80 percent of householders successfully find a unit with their voucher. Table 47 summarizes the Housing Choice Voucher use metrics for the San Diego Area Housing Authorities. Since the demand for housing assistance often exceeds the limited resources available,long waiting periods are common. The amount of time spent on the waiting list often varies, but the wait for rental assistance after a family is placed on the waiting list may be 10 or more years. These wait times can disproportionately impact seniors. As of February 2020, there were over 145,000 on the HCV waiting list (Table 48). In 2019,, the State passed SB 329 that prohibits source of income discrimination. Landlords cannot deny an applicant for rental housing based on the use of public assistance for rents. Presumably, the voucher use would increase, the time to locate a property accepting HCV would decrease, and a HCV recipient's locational choices would be expanded. "01, A 89 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 320 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 1'7A1R Table 47: Housing Choice Voucher Use Metrics #of Time to Find Unit %Households Housmig Authority Participating after Voucher that Successfully #of Port-Oiut issuance Households Landlords (Dias) Find Unit Housing Authority of the See Note 5 See Note 5 S,ce Note 5 See Note 5 City of Carlsbad Housing Authority of the 39" 68 70% 1 City of Encinitas Housing Authority of the 480 44 See Note 2 8 City of National City Housing Authority of the 540 60 76% 12 City of Oceanside San Diego Housing Commission 5)735 51 See Note 3 101 (SDHC,City of San Diego) See Note 4 Housing Authority of the County of San Diego (HACSD) 3)427 60 8 Vo 176 Note 1:These landlords only o,wn one rental.unit and it is rented to the HCV participant Note 2: The Housing Authority of the City of National, City reported that 13 households had lost their HCV in the last 6 months (November 2019-April 2020). Note 3:The S,DHC reported that approximately 4"Yo of new admission vouchers issued result in the family not utilizing the rental assistance and either surrendering the voucher,letting it expire,or no longer keeping contact with the Housing Commission. Note 4:Year-to-date Fiscal Year 2020 data. Note 5:Data could not be provided by the Housing Authority of Carlsbad prior to the public review period.The data will,be added to the final draft of the Al. Sources:San Diego Area Housing Authorities,April/May 2020. Table 48: Housing Choice Voucher Waitlist Housing Authonity Total Black Hispanic_ White Other Senior Disabled City of Carlsbad 401 2.9% 4.3% 24.0% 10.8% 16.1% 15.3% City of Encinitas 956 12.00/oi 14.1 O/oi 67.5% 6.4% 32.6% 41.7% City of National City 31)458 10.1 O/oi 6 6.3 O/oi 73.0% 32.0% 27.1% 24.0% Citv of Oceanside 5�532 14.3% 34.1% 71.8 Vo 13.9% 13.2�0 19.2()/o San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC) 98.1376 27.9% 35.0% 5 0.4 21.7% 10.0�0 23.9()/o Count of San Diego 361)337 20.00/oi 34.40/oi 66.8% 13.2% 131.3% 18.6% (I 1ACSD) Total 145)060 24.3% 34.1% 53.3% 18.9% 11.1% 21.8% Sources:San Diego Area Housing Auth ori ties 2019/20120. 'Z M�'Vf U [1 N, ?I? i"1, 1; Q'i�N�ly"'I"1,i'i'?. 90 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 321 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Figure 13: Public Trans it and Affordable Housing, ----—--------------........ 3 A 1 CK11111 4,111 Vallonvar Mountafn 315, gs V al 11,tt V, (Ne 30 311 ''IDPHIM 303 iter :313 3c)? 318 i oc'ea"Irs"k M "th n,. 332 305 -con, ido, 3,2 3 `7 mi, a 11011, Marco Es Vista, 3�5 5 35 AV�41 3,99, 4.45 ,rk, 304 353 R,d 350 309, Encinitas Encink, 4 0 8 28,01 a 20 "J, j 308 F ayIwo '945 Re ma'r'11-1 f 3 964 98 C6, 00, 92 110 San Diego Sant 0 2 00/0"?m �....... mawo,,,� 8818 0 -bo 48 41 2 1511 864 30, 150 53 2, 928 14 5,20, A7A m sa 101 04"J'a '5 .............. 917 8�51 28 9912 Affordable Units P 9 1 56 4 1 100 84 101-200 96�2 b. $ 894 A 2,01-350 351-500 7015 d"1 0 70' Transit Routes Corona, 9 704 [__j Counity Boundary F city Boundar�es 9110 11 225 .............................. �f,.............. community Boundaries .......... 19 9015 909 0 1125 25 5 perial 907 10 He 9 Mift I a I'mmm C ;1�7, 11')j,% I'moll "I .......... 11 Ed d 11, Pohl SIR *9,: -ri HILRE Garmin, G S Interm R E,Mw'E N'Th Pt"'I"'OR E s r i� DRAWT,Ail 6 V)& 4, r pc 91,, 7 r T sn(ThaiI.@'r1,d,),,,, J a pa n,,.M ri t3bina(Ho K (,,N,GCC,,(c) K "IS N Ope nS"et M a p cantributors, 0 G IS m 1�t�marfm a h1l), m�111VT I �11111111�11"N" 1,1 I,�I,I�I 1,: 0", 111,��,II'? "d 1, A 91 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 322 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; 3. Other Affordable Housing Projects A number of developments, countywide have set aside some or all of the units as, affordable for low to moderate-income households. Together these pro�jects provide approximately 39,398 units of affordable housing. The location of these units is shown on Figure 13. As in typical urban environments throughout the country, lower- and moderate-income households tend to live in higher density neighborhoods. However, as housing becomes increasingly costly to develop due to limited land available, redevelopment of existing neighborhoods such as Little Italy, East Village and other higher density areas, have raised the debate about gentrification. In general, the location of public/assisted housing is partly the result of economic feasibility. Concentrations of affordable housing are located in central San Diego, Chula Vista, National City, and Escondido. Close to 6�8 percent of all affordable units are located in these cities, much of that is in the City of San Diego (55 percent). Figure 13 also shows that in the western/coastal areas, the distribution of these units follows a somewhat similar pattern exhibited by the distribution of both low-and moderate- income population and minority population. However, this is not true for the desert communities where there is a lack of affordable housing resources but very few affordable housing units. The lack of affordable housing resources, compared to the magnitude of need, may become acute as the population in the region increases, especially given that the housing market is not keeping pace with the increasing population. According to the California Housing Partnership Corporation, San Diego County needs 143,800 more affordable rental homes to meet current demand.3() Furthermore, funding sources (such as Tax Credits and Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities) for affordable housing developments may inadvertently contribute to the concentration of affordable housing in transit-oriented neighborhoods with high-density developments. Ca e Facilities Licensed C oll'urn,Lull Ity r Persons with special needs, such as seniors and those with disabilities, must also have access to housing in a community. Community care facilities provide a supportive housing environment to persons with special needs in a group situation. Restrictions that prevent this type of housing represent a fair housing concern. While affordability is not a fair housing issue per se, stakeholders indicated that these facilities are often only available to wealthy persons. According to the California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division, there were approximately 593 State-licensed residential care facilities for the elderly, 401 adult residential facilities, and 60 adult day care facilities throughout the county as of August 2019. These licensed care facilities had a combined capacity of just over 28,000 beds. The location of the various licensed care facilities in San Diego County in 2019 is shown on Figure 14. Most of the community care facilities within the county were located within the larger incorporated cities. There was a noticeable presence of facilities in the unincorporated areas, specifically those surrounding the incorporated cities. However, since most of the county's population is located within the incorporated cities, residents living in unincorporated areas would have to travel a great distance to access the reg0on's inventory of care facilities. 30 California Housing Partnership Corporation."San,Diego County's Housing Emergency and Proposed Solutions"(May 2018) "01, A 9,2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 323 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 1'7A1R Table 49 provides a tabulation of capacity of licensed care facilities for special needs persons,by jurisdiction in 2019. The ratio of beds per 1,000 persons is used to identify concentration of residential care facilities. Licensed care facilities in San Diego County were mo�st concentrated in La Mesa, Carlsbad, Escondido, and Lemon Grove and were least concentrated in Imperial Beach and Del Mar. The Cities of San Diego, Escondido, Chula Vista'. and El Cajon had the greatest number of facilities. A high concentration of community care facilities corresponds with the highest proportion of elderly population only fo�r La Mesa. On the other hand, the Urban County jurisdictions of Coronado, Del Mar, and Solana Beach have the highest proportion of senior population but a low concentration of care facilities.These communities also have the highest median age in the County. Table 49: Licensed Community Care Facilities by jurisdiction Number Capacity %Senior Zoning jurisdiction of Beds Beds/1,000 Population Median Age Compliant With Facilities Population Lanterman Act Urban County Coronado 1 120 5.0 18.40(Vo 34.2 Yes Del Mar 1 6 1.3 20.80(Vo 43.5 Yes Imperial Beach 2 38 1.4 9.001vo 28.6 Yes Lemon Grove 17 501 18.4 11.20% 34.7 Yes Poway 39 373 7.4 12.30(Vo 36.9 Yes Solana Beach 4 148 10.6 18.700/() 41.6 Yes Unincorporated 168 3)262 6.3 12.800/() N/A Yes Total Urban Count 41 ,y 232 448 6.7 18.40% 34.2 Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 29 21240 19.4 14.00% 38.9 Yes Chula Vista 73 21304 8.5 10.00% 33 Yes El Cajon 98 1753 16.6 11.00% 31.9 Yes Encinitas 12 551 8.7 12.80% 37.9 Yes Escondido 133 2918 19.1 10.50% 31.2 Yes La Mesa 35 1.1243 20.4 14.20% 37.3 Yes National City 18 716 11.5 10.60% 28.7 Yes Oceanside 56 1.1608 9.0 12.90% 33.3 Yes San Diego 349 71798 5.5 10.70% 32.5 Yes San Marcos 32 11166 11.9 10.20% 32.1 Yes Santee 16 179 3.1 10.70% 34.8 Yes Vista 72 11207 11.8 9.20% 30.3 Yes Total County 1)155 28)131 8.4 11.40% 33.2 Source:State of California Department of Social Services,Community Care Licensing Division, anuary 2020.California Department of Finance,Population Estimates(E5),2019, 'Z M�'Vf U [1 N, ?I? i"1, 1; Q'i ly"'I" i'? 9�3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 324 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL f7kM H1(")UJ Figure 14: Licensed Care Facilities j L, d/, 0 Me W/ 4 -Ar, Wa/ t"vr�,�7,1111,14 J,P41" P 4 L�0&VA R Al Al /10/ f 0 ICI 44 4(1,�,I,rl 0", 'A "OR 0// o/ V ce e "ni d e' jgp, I t A 0 Yl n I i an 10 C e ivt�,,Si 0C, P /0 A i 'Esco , C........ar I t;111,x,J" ',:von A A ista wb, ICarlsbad 0 San, v s c c) Me' Go Mart-1 "11 1 Ix� E '�'�-fta,s,, cini 78 A ALI ir n rti k Jq 1,�,I r,Y Solana, Beach Poway 41 k-il ari�on;a 1:-Z a 11 ch, D 'III, "o, n id ii ago 0 IZ�pN PI)ry �1 v R n a �Ma "III A i I[nt ler) /0,;0,T'V'A 1 0 11 j� C iM r F A A, "7/ 0 FA 11,7 0"M L"',"J,Ith, ................... ""SantDiego 52 Santee 1,� 111,11v X 'M 163 i"Al 11 % I'M ITIN E 1,,C a ,r�qj '70 V T"A 4 Lemon Grove,,,,,, "t"S 7' j aTrI E,R A, Licensed Care Facilities 411 Res�dentail Care for the Elderly co u�5 J P®r,),�,,!rd'L "AL Aduft Res�dential FaGififies -Nation"al- F", C- i w Il;y I'd LIP1,011y,tof"I")S Aduft Day Program 0MM C umty�Bouridaries, Corona"do City Roundaries C, N7 ir COUnty Boundary Chula YP 11 Irly.5 If D,07,,//r1 Ad Wki VistaIll 'a" 01 1.25 2-5 5 75 In i-,Y Miles m pe ri a -1217p 19 ork �w DMWIAP Beach Us -Soarces',Fsd,USGS, N0AA,IS0u`r1res,-.Esri,Garmin,U$,Gs,W�,s 1i I u,I na 9�4 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 325 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ uni.ti...e s to Oppor�ct.,_` Having access to quality jobs and effective public transportation helps facilitate a good quality of life and improved life outcomes. Unfortunately, research has shown that racial and ethnic minorities, individuals with disabilities, and other protected classes often have restricted access to these vital amenities. This section addresses, access to public transit and employment (Exposure to Adverse Community Factors,, inclusive of Public Schools, is addressed in the next Section). 10 Public Trans it Access to public transit is of paramount importance to households affected by low incomes and rising housing prices. Public transit should strive to link.lower income persons,who are often transit dependent, to major employers where job opportunities exist. Access to employment via public transportation can reduce welfare usage and increase housing mobility,which enables residents to locate housing outside of traditionally low-income neighborhoods.31 The lack of a relationship between public transit, employment opportunities, and affordable housing may impede fair housing choice. Persons who depend on public transit may have limited choices regarding places to live. In addition, seniors and disabled persons also often rely on public transit to visit doctors,go shopping,or attend activities at community facilities. Public transit that provides a link between job opportunities, public services, and affordable housing helps to ensure that transit-dependent residents have adequate opportunity to access housing, services, and jobs. The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is the Regional Transportation Planning Authority responsible for planning and allocating local, state, and federal funds for the region's transportation network. Two primary agencies are responsible for transit operations and services in the county: Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and the North County Transit District (NCTD). Transit services provided by these agencies include commuter and light rail, fixed-route bus service, demand- response service, and paratransit. Transit services are primarily provided to the larger, more urbanized communities,, although limited services are available in unincorporated areas. In addition, tribal governments operating casinos and non-profit agencies also provide transit services for their clients and customers.The NCTD and MTS also own and maintain the main rail line along the coast from downtown San Diego to the Orange County line, which is shared between Amtrak intercity, COASTER, and Metrolink commuter passenger rail services. NCTD also owns the rail corridor between Oceanside and Escondido, operating SPRINTER light rail service. Figure 15 illustrates the transit routes in relation to employment centers. As shown in Figure 15, public transit providers serve large portions of the western side of the county. In particular, transit use is higher in parts of the region where the greatest investment in transit service has been made: the north coastal, central and south bay regions of the county. Almost all major employment centers in San Diego are served by some form of public transit. However, having regional access to jobs by means of public transit does not necessarily translate into stable employment. Low-income workers, especially female heads of household with children, have unique travel patterns, that may prevent them from obtaining work far from home, regardless of access to public transit. Women in general are disproportionately responsible for household-supporting activities such as trips to grocery stores or accompanying young children to and from schools. Women using public transit are often limited to 31 Ong, Paul, and Evelyn Blumenberg, "Job Accessibility and Welfare Usage: Evidence from Los Angeles". UCLA, Department of Policy Studies,(1998). "01, A 9�5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 326 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ looking for employment near home, allowing them time to complete these household-sustaining trips.3? The Center for Housingpolicy33has done extensive research showing that the real cost of housing includes the cost of a household's daily commute to work, and typically low income households spend a much higher proportion of after-tax income on transportation—about one-third—than the average household.34 2, Major Employers As one of the major metropolitan areas in the country, San Diego County has a diverse economy. The San Diego County population and employment growth rates typically correlate to national economic cycles and are sensitive to military spending. Military employment is still concentrated in the region as San Diego County is home to major naval bases and the U.S. Marine base at Camp Pendleton. San Diego is the headquarters of the U.S. Navy"s Eleventh Naval District and is the Navy's principal location for West Coast and Pacific Ocean operations. Naval Base San Diego is the principal home to the Pacific Fleet. Naval Air Station (NAS) North Island is located on the north side of Coronado, and is the headquarters for Naval Air Forces and Naval Air Force Pacific, the bulk of the Pacific Fleet's helicopter squadrons, and part of the West Coast aircraft carrier fleet. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton is the major west coast base of the United States Marine Corps and serves as its prime amphibious training base. Major employers, organizations with the largest number of employees, are mo�stly located throughout the Central Coastal and South Bay sub-regions of San Diego County. Major employers in the region include colleges, university campuses, military, federal and state government, and hospitals and medical centers. Inland/desert areas are still relatively scarce with regard to employment opportunities. The closest major employers to the inland/desert areas are the eight Indian casino/gaming/lodging centers. Because of its location along the Mexican border and adjacent to the Pacific Ocean, international trade is a major economic strength for the region. The border between San Diego and Mexico is the busiest in the world and the San Diego Port contributes a significant number of jobs to the region. Figure 15 shows that public transit routes provide adequate access to employment centers on the western side of the county. In the eastern inland areas, public transit access and major employers are scarce. 32 Blumenberg,Evelyn."Reverse Commute),I ransit Pro�,)-rams and Single Mothers on Welfare:A Policy Mismatch?",institute of Transportation Studies,Volume 1 Number 2, (December 2002). 33 Lipman, Barbara J. "A Heavy Load:The Combined Housing and Transportation Burdens of Working Families". Center for Housing Policy, (October 2006). 34 Giuliano,Genevieve."The Role of Public Transit in the Mobility of Low"Income Households".School of Policy,Planning, and Development,University of Southern California(may 2001). "01, A 9�6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 327 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; Table 50: Major Employers - San Diego County Name Address City industry Employer Size Class Naval Base San Diego 32nd St Naval Station San Diego Federal Government- 101000+ National Security Barona Resort&Casino 1932 Wildcat Canyon Lakeside Casinos 1)000-4)999 Rd. 33750 Valley Center Valley S�wimming Pool 1)000-4)999 Ceasar Entertainment Rd. Center Construction,Dealers, &Designers Employee s'As sociation- 8330 Century Park Ct. San Diego Associations 1)000-4)999 S D(_�T'&E-i, I General Dynamics NASSCO 2798 Harbor Dr. San Diego Ship Builders& 1)000-4)999 Repairers (mfrs) Illumina Inc 5200 Illumina Way San Diego Biotechnology 15000-4599�9 Products&Services Kaiser Permanente Vandever 4405 Vandever Ave. San Diego Physicians&Surgeons 55000-9599�9 Med I Kaiser Permanente Zion Med 46�47 Zion Ave. San Diego Hospitals 15000-4599�9 Ctr M(`.CS MC.RD (Marine Corps 1(000+ Community Services Marine 3800 Chosin Ave. San Diego Towing-Marine Cor2s Recruit Depot) Merchants Building 9555 Distribution Ave. San Diego janitor Service 11000-41999 Maintenance Palomar Pomerado Health 555 E Valley Pkwy 5th Escondido Rehabilitation Services 11000-41999 Rehab Floor Rady Children's Hospital 3020("hildren's Way. San Diego Hospitals 15000-4599�9 San Diego Community 3375 Camino Del Rio San Diego J untor-Community 55000-9599�9 College S. College-Tech Institutes San Diego County Sheriff John F.Duffy San Diego Police Departments 15000-4599�9 .Administrative Center Scripps Mercy I losp Sn Diego 4077 Fifth Ave. San Diego Hospitals 15000-4599�9 Scripps Research Institute 10550 N Torrey Pines La J olla Laboratories-Research 15000-4599�9 Rd. &Development Seaworld San Diego 500 Sea World Dr. San Diego Water Parks 15000-4599�9 1 Sharp Mary Birch I lospital 3003 Health Center Dr. San Diego Hospitals 15000-4599�9 Sharp Memorial Hospital 7901 Frost St. San Diego Hospitals 15000-4599�9 Sony Electronics 16535 Via Esprillo San Diego Electronic Equipment 11000-41999 &Supplies-Retail Health,Care 55000-9599�9 UC San Diego I lealth 200 W Arbor Dr. San Diego Management University of California San 9500 Gilman Dr. La Jolla University-College 1 MOO+ Die o Dept/Facility/Offi.ce US N,avy,,Med Ctr- 34800 Bob Wilson Dr San Diego Clinics 13000-43999 orthopedics # 112 Source:State of California Employment Development Department,20�20. `2 9�7 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 328 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FY`S']1'(�)I F'AiR F11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; Figure 15: Transit Service and Major Employers ........ -------- ..................7— T 'N' Affl/ 7 T"/�g/; !g �4/6 /�,,07 /g/JF'//, d 01� A F,,," ,/4 '40 J A, s/ r OFF WAFF, `x/ 00 m 0/1 AAI, rl't A"v t AN, 11 i�'_ MA R 4, P A v IM Ad 111C.") T"I A f ie,"vio 4,11 A 11 F mffiv,10 Vi A1111 'N gul-ilk I i eii FA J J/1' (3`15� �4 N,01�i 00 S, 7, Of /Jam" R 0/011 6, 11,3p, loll IF 'T N,(3,J Th T1 In 3111 ........ J0, 01 0edanst e 392 1 A 3�4 11-1_1�'� Iv�"vl �.V "ALY ""i,C 1 313) "W'(",le ij J ry !"pel r Y41 ry J V 3G 11'04, J/1/ IF/ Es�c ndido ig T_ 305) L AO/ San 359 1,3 358 3 5 5�) 'Marcos, 33 3991 356" J 5 1 45" 352'' % 00� V & 35 3 Carl ad �3 0 37 J 1304) 1�� nrov,v t(Hlm'f CE: 1�,_irk C', Oro" ir,411,Enci ffitas? 010 8 3��0411 X 946 00 1, olan.. ............ 136acb 0^, a 90 De'l w wi,dii a im 20 Tt e, It Mar", W,r it e 98 V, J� 92 1 J'� (2317' 4, 972) orfer 97 3) 31 Adl 012 .0 89 10/r/ �%`No�;I[+'San Diego Jii3 2 1105 150"', -San 838" 60 Y ILI 66 4' 1101 44 ................ 81 q i,� 27" 310) -, �� -'928 ........ 85 t, 4 1 111� - I"I��/,',I I v,q 0 9! 91 50 14 Z �,ex v ati oin 530 gv p, 000,� J8 "plov 2 7 A/1 �4 3 5 Q,2�,) 93�6) 56 IW -J S 4 ...... 12 04 N!i 067 'M 11 P J Major Employers 0 4 863' ",961 fr N C",o) Transit Routes 113 J�7 0&5 70 '1_7 I 1 1,4 J 9 1, Nati, 11 1 1 's r L—Al County Boundary e, 4 Coronadb,, '7 Clity Boundavies 11929 712 C hu' ta Community Boundaries 10 1 11 _1� e, N t", 9312L ta IJ,���""', 701 vis 933�- ...... 9 3�4 A/m, "g, 10 V!�` 7 501. §g, 1DRAW1 A t" B h 'A N e's,:Esh,,U.�,9,5 QAA,�SO I Urces'."Est Garm Sourc in,U WS 98 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 329 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; 3. Affordable Housing and Public Transit Limited access to public transit may counteract some of the benefits of affordable housing. Current research indicates a strong connection between housing and transportation costs.Housing market patterns in parts of California with job-rich city centers are pushing lower-income families to the outskirts of urban areas,where no transit is available to connect them with jobs and services. In lower-income communities with underserved city centers,many residents must commute out to suburban job-rich areas.In an attempt to save money on housing, many lower-income households are spending disp�roportionately higher amounts on transportation. A study conducted by the Center for Housing Policy revealed that families who spend more than half of their income on housing spend only eight percent on transportation,while families who spend 30 percent or less of their income on housing spend almost 24 percent on transportation.35 This equates to more than three times the amount spent by persons living in less affordable housing. According to the Reconnecting America organization, "for low-income families, the ability to live in an C� affordable home near good public transportation translates into improved access to healthcare, education and employment opportunities, and reduced commutingCoStS." 36Given the benefits of living close to transit-,locating assisted housing near public transportation would increase the quality of life of the assisted householders. Figure 16 illustrates the location of the county's affordable housing stock in relation to regional transit services.Many affordable housing pro�jects are located in close proximity to regional transit routes, with the exception of the eastern portions of the county,where few assisted units are located. 35 Sard, Barbara and Rice,Douglas. "Creating Opportunity for ChIldren How Housing Location Can Make a Difference". Center on Budget and Policy Pri.ori.ti.es. (October 2014). 36 The National Housing Trust Reconnecting America. "Preserving Affordable Housing Near Transit." Enterprise Community Partners (2010). M�'Vf 1� 11 N, I F,� 9�9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 330 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FT`S']1'(�)f F'AiR 11(")IJ SUl'',,�('; Figure 16: Transit Service and Publicly Assisted Housing �k, 5i" 388 3, 41,1 1 IP aft oniar, Mauntain 315 306 311 q(f, A 303 3C19 Ocoans,i V11 325 K 305 MArc,S. Escondido jjlil 323 liij� Ista 357 355 Al J��, 4�4 144b 352 35 3 371 F 3150 JU 1 309 E n c in itas 235 408 280 946 ik "a 20 j 3018 Setan a Beafc!3 o, ay 9145 e 94 M!a r d" CIA $14(ppos 40ho 96 4 398, V,'3 978 92 891; 973 )y 31 11 San Diego 02 Sa,n Rn, 9 1188 ONO N' 1161111111111111111111111� 848 41 44, 44, 30 150 - (53 77' 9 ?N, 120 9 "4�1 4 520 We If 816 10 0 3 917 Affordable Units rl� 28 99 Pf", 856, 4 1-if 00 L a 84 11�11 101-200 962 10 W5` 8,94 t,'('0'eq, oni A, 201-350 961 351-500 — 1 1 705 707 i n V 11'a Transit Routes Corona '0" 704 County Boundary I 1901 '2 5 City Boundaries Community Boundaries 933 701 ........... 934 905 '909 111111k A Y 0 1.25 2.5 5 1 Imp'erial 907 Mks V Be ac .........// 100ff pff SJ M&E�"sri HLRE,Garmin S I n ter r m ........................... Esn DRAW I AF a Pjkm, Japan,ML11,Esri lt,,hina H a VS. ` Esr,ill,"", E'kf,�Th a i[ah" NGCC,' C) Al itty 15 1 S MIA V OpenS#betMap conirlibutors, vi 1hile GIS U 0 Mi,u h Y AIR, Marl M�111VT I �11111111�11"N" I? i,�I, 1;�, Ct,11 ItN,ly"'I"111,��, "d 1, A 100 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 331 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 1'11("')UJ mill 11 an t Public Facilitles (Sect* 54 101 1 M " 1 1% (1,11110 01 P N ssessi,i,'i,e1 it) Access to civic life by people with disabilities is a fundamental goal of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). To ensure that this goal is met,Title 11 of the ADA requires State and local governments to make their programs and services accessible to persons with disabilities. This requirement not only extends to physical access at government facilities, programs, and events, but also to policy changes that governmental entities must make to ensure that all people with disabilities can take part in, and benefit from', the programs and services of State and local governments. The development of an ADA Transition Plan is a requirement of the federal regulations implementing the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which require that all organizations receiving federal funds make their programs available without discrimination to persons with disabilities. The Transition Plan (also known as a Program Access Plan) identifies physical obstacles that limit the accessibility of facilities to individuals with disabilities, describes the prescribed methods to make the facilities accessible, provides a schedule for making the access modifications, and identifies the public officials responsible for implementation of the transition plan. Carlsbad, Encinitas, Imperial Beach, National City, San Diego (City), San Diego (County), and Santee provided updates for this report. The County of San Diego has indicated that their government facilities are ADA-compliant. The City of San Diego conducted a Self-Evaluation as mandated under the ADA. From that analysis, a required transition plan was created which included 212 high use city facilities that needed physical modifications to make them accessible. In 200�9 the City updated its Transition Plan and identified 182 additional high-use public facilities requiring architectural barrier removal. Since the 2009 update the City has completed 34 of these facilities; an additional 32 facilities are funded and 116 remain unfunded. Both the County of San Diego and the City of San Diego continue to evaluate their public facilities for compliance with current accessibility regulations and update its list of projects needing barrier removal. National City indicated its facilities are not ADA compliant, however the City has a transition plan in place that was adopted in June 2019. Santee also indicated that its City facilities are not fully ADA Compliant, however, there are plans to make all of the City facilities compliant, has an approved ADA Transition Plan, and has made numerous ADA improvements to City Parks, Fire Stations, and other facilities, including City Hall. The City of Carlsbad and City of Imperial Beach indicated that their government facilities are ADA-compliant, as all improvements identified in their ADA Transitions Plans are complete. The City of Encinitas indicated that they have an approved Self-Evaluation and ADA Transition Plan. "01' A 101 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 332 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FT'S']F(",�)l F'AiR Table 51: ADA-Compliant Public Facilities jurisdiction ADA Transition Plan Facilities ADA Compliant Urban County Coronado Del Mar Imperial Beach Yes Yes Lemon Grove Poway Solana Beach Entitlement Cities Carlsbad Yes Yes Chula Vista Yes ...1 lCajon F.ncinitas Yes In progress F.scondido La Mesa National City Yes In progress Oceanside San Diego Yes In progress San Marcos Santee Yes In progress Vista San Diego County Yes Note:.Jurisdictions with.empty cells did not provide information regarding.A.D.A compliance. 0 Elxp�m",')suxe to .,Asl ver'se Fq.,clu ris oil iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillilI Communities must consider fair housing when addressing exposure to community factors adverse to their quality of life and poverty mitigation because either the problems themselves,or solution to the problems, may have a disproportionate negative effect on some residents. Community factors of concern include disparities in access to opportunities affecting including public education, transit/transportation, jobs/labor,and environmental health.Another concern are environmental risks to vulnerable populations, including pregnant women, young children, and individuals with disabilities—all of whom are protected under fair housing law. L Public Schools Public schools within San Diego County are grouped by 23 elementary school districts, six high school districts, 13 unified school districts, and five community college districts. The San Diego County Office of Education provides a variety of services for these 42 school districts, 139 charter schools, and five community college districts in the county. "01' A 102 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 333 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")UJ SUl'',,�('; As part of President Johnson's "War on Poverty," the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESE-LA I passed in 1965.The ESEA is often regarded as the most far-reaching federal legislation affecting education ever passed by Congress.The act is an extensive statute that funds primary and secondary education,while emphasizing equal access to education and establishing high standards and accountability. A major component of ESEA is a series of programs typically referred to as "Title I". Title I provides financial assistance to states and school districts to meet the needs of educationally at-risk students.To qualify as a Title I school, a campus typically must have around 40 percent or more of its students coming from families who are low-income. The goal of Title I is to provide extra instructional services and activities which support students identified as failing or most at risk of failing the state's challenging performance standards in mathematics, reading, and wrifing. Figure 17 and Figure 18 show the location of Title I schools in San Diego County. While Title I schools are not located in all cities and communities, the geographic distribution of Title I schools generally matches the geographic distribution of minorities and low- and moderate-income persons in the county. Addressing access to higher achieving schools is important, as studies have shown that low-income children who live in low-poverty neighborhoods and consistently attend high-quality schools perform significantly better academically than those who do not.37 37 Sard, Barbara and Rice,Douglas. "Creating Opportunity for Children How Housing Location Can Make a Difference". Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (October 2014). "01, A 103 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 334 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR H1(")UJ Figure 17: Distribution of Title I Schools and Low- and Moderate-Income Areas /A 1 1/11 ve, 00 'g J� J� A a 'na Vviho�n A an Wei I I.J 4�J'0, J fc A'i f M 4 v A W.,Af" A, fvn 4 0100 k 1111, 7 61 M UO& Carisliou Al, I'liIA _0A J� 4 .......... III Eh"Id Itas T, k A 11 EV" ,!�ga/A I mv,, olana AM A B46C 1',,4 �Je V1 Po,way, L J) ri Del V'A I��, I 0 AN A a rA9 A All i p ,fLf 2 Ilk lei �,V Ole ? A, r A,, A& 00 "0 da" Sa -----------..... A a Di 1% A/ 40 4111111 1 110 IF, 77 e1T1 1,11 W Ail A P, A Tme 1,5cnool V"Iz A p Not TA]e�1:School Low and Maderate Income Aseas" L Ciounty Boundar� A City Boundaries AA4 irl Corona A h U I OJV, ............................. C o m m u:n 11 y B ou nd a rile S ista 0A'Uieriuo w b 50,:rn,jp vVm-e Yo poi rni�Y�V"1 5 L,11 ell, 1111101, I'A. h-_1 _W dd' W f�V 1 3 �114 Y, �.D V1 CRI f I�rtp n� 61 _)) rA/'b1,.1 VA 01 qn/ up, t 1 25 2.5 5 13 j/ Wes B 7 DILAWTAII GIs ------ N So,urces�1,E8�rii,,,U-,SGS,��OAA,,,Sources"'.Es,ri,,Gdlr/mi�n,,USGS,,N�PS ......................................................... 104 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 335 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR H1(")UJ SUl'',,�('; Figure 18: Distribution of Title I Schools and Areas of Mino�rity Concentration Area 0/0' -g- F J J/ ol Y IN A 3, d", M, 'x//,.a/,, Z/� "ge '00 /1W T/ A J, A F, Y 7 A A A f 180 ,;7 J/ J, lor A �k 'M Z, PINK-' F 0 Af Y cea side 01 '_g/ 7 ell 1, jo AN �,o A /a, ow p, A o/ LV/ J, AM `/11� X 7 A "wo kll A A"y At, 0 my, 11-011h, M/1 All A I/V 0 A F11 A A X j A A/M v P A pox d W Ji, �x A "W J/111, 10" A: vi gia 10111211 0 f/A A' e �y j A A at s Ub I' �bad' I* 0, '0�, Al od, a Al, A J." 0 V A n 77 gJ/1 4-",i","(",//`- 0 A I/A n///Iitas nd �llfl�l (/0 te 10/a/All?" A "0,j 0 1/,/,jel"I Ipml��,`)'J� r A Solana,B a c h' M/ if/0 'J, 6W & Ddm6r' J 0? 4- 11 'A Mp A 2300/0r; '0� A 0 1 1/ * , , , d A x; A/n /6/1 SO A A� AN /00 0A /j, Mog"I A q 90111 o X J, /rA, or Sa nite"'e' "' Y/,/ All A A San Diego mi /�q?j L Op" k, Akf A, A` 311, �A 0 M"Mr/ A-_f` A vr E] n A, o Ow "A A V 001 /e Aff I//V 04011 0/ A* "e, /Al W AIP 0 z R, A �04& 7 rW A ,11pal "A d / I "A d % I Ad T/ I/A �e/& /............. V 1/40 Ilk "1"40/0 A 011 /Affi/ IC Mfle I�S�chool . ........ 4&, ................. A-/ OT Nut Title I School UWA, A, p /A "llf"llp FIN P "",, Wnu6ty Conuentration.Areas* atio,nal G,i y f County Boundary 411,�pw A C4 Bciunda6es 40,1, Community Boundaries Coronadq,,, C e I,lus Uu U�',p uh"'efl W,9-,6 ul I 1,/J'I ro,w0i V OL�m I J SH r I w U 11� m V"ac m�,Wv i im J V!W 9'j Z1 I I J;J -A�al Al U" C b . ..... All z/X//,�// v a 0 125 2.5 5 a/ ow, mem Al m p, Miles dw Imoerial "App, 77/77777/0 100 "A DRAWrAP 'B� Ac GI S e' h N Sources:Esr[,USGS,NOAA,Sources,Esri,Gamlin,USG,S,NPS .................................................. /000/0, 'A,I", Y,XV/0" /1111VII/ 01 /ow/ 105 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 336 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ I Disparities in Access to Op*-%ortunity F HUD has developed a series of indices for the purpose of fair housing assessment to help inform communities about disparities in access to opportunity. HUD-p�rovided index scores are based on nationally available data sources and assess residents' access to key opportunity assets in San Diego County. These indices, are only available to Entitlement jurisdictions (with population over 50,000 and receiving CDBG funds from HUD). For Urban County jurisdictions for which a HUD-provided index is not provided, a similar analysis as that provided by the indices was conducted using comparable information. For example, for the I_,ow Poverty Index, the poverty status of the population provided by the 2013-2017 American Community Survey estimates were used. Table 52,provides index scores or values (the values range from zero to 100) for the following opportunity indicator indices: • Low Poverty Index: The low poverty index captures poverty in a given neighborhood. The poverty rate is determined at the census tract level. Thehigher the score, the less exposure to poverty in a neighborhood • School Proficiency Index: The school proficiency index uses scho�ol-level data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams to describe which neighborhoods have high- performing elementary schools nearby and which are near lower performing elementary schools. The higher the score, the higher the school system quality is in a neighborhood • Labor Market Engagement Index: The labor market engagement index provides a summary description of the relative intensity of labor market engagement and human capital in a neighborhood. This is based upon the level of employment, labor force participation, and educational attainment in a census tract. The higher the score, the higher the labor force participation andhuman capitalin a neighborhood • Transit Trips Index: This index is based on estimates of transit trips taken by a family that meets the following description: a three-person single-parent family with income at 50% of the median income for renters for the region (i.e. the Core-Based Statistical Area (CBS.A)). The higher the transit trips index, themore likely residents in that neighborhood utilize public transit. • Low Transport ation Cost Index: This index is based on estimates of transportation costs, for a family that meets the following description: a three-person single-parent family with income at 50 percent of the median income for renters for the region/CBSA. The higher the index, the lower the cost of transportation in that neihborhood • jobs Proximity Index: The jobs proximity index quantifies the accessibility of a&en residential neighborhood as a function of its distance to all job locations within a region/CBSA,with larger employment centers weighted more heavily. The higher the index value, the better the access, to employment opportunities forretsidents-in a ne_tA*?hbothood • Environmental Health Index: The environmental health index summarizes potential exposure to harmful toxins at a neighborhood level. The higher the index value,the less exposure to toxins harmful to human health. Therefore, the higher the value, the better the environmental quality of a neighborhood, where a neighborhood-i's a census block-group. As shown in Table 52, in San Diego County, Native American, Black, and Hispanic residents were more likely (compared to other racial/ethnic groups) to be impacted by poverty, limited access to proficient "01, A 106 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 337 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR schools, lower labor participation rate. Black residents were most likely to reside in areas with the lowest environmental quality levels, the lowest accessibility to employment centers, and the lowest cost of transportation. Black and Asian residents scored highest as most likely to utilize public transportation. Additional detailed breakdowns by Entitlement jurisdiction are shown in Table 52,. For the smaller jurisdictions (with population less than 50,000) participating in the HUD programs as part of the Urban County, the report utilizes other sources of data to provide similar analysis. "01' A 107 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 338 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 1'11("')UJ Table 52: Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity-Entitlement jurisdictions Low School Labor Market Transit Low Jobs Environmental Poverty Pro�ficiency Transportation Proxim*t Index Index 1 y Health Index Index Index Cost Index index San Diego County Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 61.91 64.61 48.93 70.89 55.42 5 2.8 9 54.81 Black.,Non-Hispanic 51.74 53.72 35.21 78.11 63.07 49.79 43.66 Hispanic 51.71 53.49 37.87 75.68 60.19 51.28 47.15 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-HIspanic 65.75 64.96 55.06 78.19 59.63 51.68 47.98 Native American,Non-Hispanic 50.41 48.00 31.93 54.60 47.68 56.76 67.85 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-HIspanic 51.94 58.45 41.93 72.79Y 58.18 52.36 51.65 Black,Non-Hispanic 42.16 42.08 33.28 86.15 69.30 48.05 36.75 Hispanic 39.99 46.71 32.57 79.68 65.00 48.70 42-87 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 60.01 60.14 48.58 75.21 59.26 51.72 50-68 Native American,Non-Hispanic 45.10 37.12 34.42 64.82 54.52 51-65 57.91 Carlsbad Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 56.98 88.09 70.63 87.29 64.71 54.62 56.23 Black,Non-Hispanic 58.41 87.6�8 72.18 86.91 64.92 63�.87 54.04 Hispanic 53.57 84.92 64.92 87.35 67.62 56.59 52.54 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 58.22 89.6�3 73.27 87.17 64.04 57.91 5 6.49 Native American,Non-Hispanic 56.38 83.47 66�.64 87.15 66.85 60.13 53.79 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-Hispanic 54.04 86.83 67.87 87.02 66.3 54.77 54.96 Black,Non-Hispanic 46.85 93.95 70.88 86.44 57.14 47.44 58.41 Hispanic 48.35 82.09 61.14 87.85 69.88 60.68 50.51 Asian or Paci.fic Islander,Non-Hispanic 51.63 88.62 69.97 90.35 73.31 46.14 57.38 Native American,Non-Hispanic 31.00 86.82 68.00 92.00 75.00 50.36 71.00 Q,,11 111,��,i,?h ("'d('1" A 108 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 339 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 1'11("')UJ Table 52: Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity-Entitlement jurisdictions Low School Labor Market Transit Low Jobs Environmental Poverty Pro�ficiency Transportation Proxim*t Index Index 1 y Health Index Index Index Cost Index index Chula Vista Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 65.41 69.32 48.41 83.96 64.09 5 2.8 9 39�.92 Black.,Non-Hispanic 62.25 69.74 47.89 86.1 66.52 55.89 38.15 Hispanic 54.71 64.74 38.93 87.71 69.38 53-35 35-32 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-HIspanic 73.70 74.41 58.92 83.65 61.59 53.9-5 40.95 Native American,No n-Hispanic 56.87 66.29 40.33 86�.75 68.86 5-5.53 37.19 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-HIspanic 54.91 68.71 41.46 86�.61 69.61 55.5 37.15 Black,Non-Hispanic 36.78 62.01 27.56 91.31 76.50 56-96 29.09 Hispanic 39.43 61.19 28.35 89.97 75.32 56.76 31-86 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 46.94 62.93 35.44 88.98 71.40 46-31 30.76 Native American,Non-Hispanic 53.31 69.93 44.32 85.73 68.56 54-61 40-06 El Cajon Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 34.31 57.15 31.85 87.87 74.73 55.87 25.51 Black,Non-Hispanic 22.38 51.51 24.01 91.16 80.62 58.30 20.24 9( zi r, Hispanic 24.02 52.85 24.75 ).Tl',� 78.93 57.18 21.95 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 30.57 54.15 29.31 88.97 76.95 57.27 23.22 Native American,Non-Hispanic 29.17 55.97 27.51 89.00 76.98 56.93 23.95 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-Hispanic 19.39 52.91 20.82 91.51 80.07 55.85 22.47 B.1ack,Non-Hispanic 11.70 49.66 15.47 92.94 83.40 63.33 17.01 Hispanic 17.74 52.63 21.92 91.58 81.06 58.48 20.62 Asian or Paci.fic Islander,Non-Hispanic 17.43 54.99 22.33 91.85 79.27 50.48 22.24 Native American,Non-Hispanic 12.14 56.01 11.98, 94.35 85.6 56.03 15.43 Q,,11 111,��,i,?h ("'d('1" A 109 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 340 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 1'11("')UJ Table 52: Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity-Entitlement jurisdictions Low School Labor Market Transit Low Jobs Environmental Poverty Pro�ficiency Transportation Proxim*t Index Index 1 y Health Index Index Index Cost Index index Encinitas Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 63.69 79.79 76.64 85.15 66.08 62.34 65.91 Black.,Non-Hispanic 60.80 81.90 74.07 84.07 65.39 63.41 67.20 Hispanic 59.78 80.52 73.07 85.61 66.44 57.09 65-67 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-HIspanic 63.94 79.74 75.98 84.26 64.83 63.57 66.08 Native American,Non-Hispanic 61.90 80.83 77.06 86�.31 67.7 58.66 66.58 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-HIspanic 62.73 81.38 77.22 85.19 67.46 65.58 66.43 Black,Non-Hispanic 40.00 94.94 54.00 73.00 53.00 59.69 70.00 Hispanic 49.48 83.75 73.41 87.92 70.29 57.08 67-57 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 63.18 78.08 76�.72 86.37 65.1 54.08 65-32 Native American,Non-Hispanic 31.00 86.82 68.00 92.00 75.00 50-36 71.00 Escondido Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 43.28 37.79 41.14 78.66 63.19 41.67 39�.58 Black,Non-Hispanic 33.94 28.16 32.53 86.74 71.34 42.83 33�.46 Hispanic 30.08 21.6�6 29.39 88.31 72.37 42.35 30.93 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 42.6�4 34.36 39.52 80.57 64.68 40.38 3 8.6 3 Native American,Non-Hispanic 37.19 28.36 35.76 84.03 68.32 44.13 34.78 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-Hispanic 35.98 32.2 37.19 84.22 68.56 42.83 35.4 B.1ack,Non-Hispanic 26.28 22.15 31.14 88.59 76.63 42.18 30.13 Hispanic 25.71 20.75 26.71 90.17 75.36 46.89 27.52 Asian or Paci.fic Islander,Non-Hispanic 21.05 16.34 28.22 88.42 68.27 39.84 31.09 Native American,Non-Hispanic 28.73 22.45 26�.37 89.23 75.52 28.60 32.84 Q,,11 111,��,i,?h ("'d('1" A 110 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 341 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR l'11("')UJ Table 52: Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity-Entitlement jurisdictions Low School Labor Market Transit Low Jobs Environmental Poverty Pro�ficiency Transportation Proxim*t Index Index 1 y Health Index Index Index Cost Index index La Mesa Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 61.16 68.68 60.78 89.24 78.00 57.47 30.71 Black.,Non-Hispanic 55.07 61.30 55-90 90.02 78.98 59.59 29�.24 Hispanic 58.63 64.56 58.06 89.57 78.42 58-95 29�.82 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-HIspanic 58.50 62.51 57.44 89.7 78.28 56.02 30.23 Native American,Non-Hispanic 58.04 63.49 56�.41 89.72 78.17 58.1-3 29.70 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-HIspanic 60.07 68.63 59.5 89.63 79.22 63.90 30.92 Black,Non-Hispanic 43.60 55.39 40.49 91.63 81.08 63.07 26-66 Hispanic 51.55 63.82 55.25 90.36 80.26 63-12 28-65 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 55.39 65.15 53.25 90.82 79.48 58-08 30-81 Native American,Non-Hispanic 64.66 43.29 48.95 89.39 73.23 46-96 29�.o5 National City Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 26.34 43.72 23.61 72.63 73.64 69�.90 37.58 Black,Non-Hispanic 23.89 43.73 21.65 75.24 75.84 65.29� 36.49 Hispanic 21.74 39.84 22.83 87.27 78.85 52.60 3 6.8 3 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 24.6�4 45.55 27.13 88.11 78.09 59.39 3 6.8 0 Native American,Non-Hispanic 23.95 41.6�5 21.48, 74.45 75.35 65.53 37.15 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-Hispanic 20.02 43.54 20.63 86.62 80.33 60.64 36.51 Black,Non-Hispanic 14.34 39.00 16.26 92.77 83.85 47.55 35.56 Hispanic 18.64 39.69 21.71 89.20 81.33 53.94 36.15 Asian or Paci.fic Islander,Non-Hispanic 18.99 46.55 33.29 92.66 83.71 66.3 36.44 Native American,Non-Hispanic 28.82 50.82 32.27 87.56 75.12 47.05 37.46 Q,,11 111,��,i,?h ("'d('1" A 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 342 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 1'11("')UJ Table 52: Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity-Entitlement jurisdictions Low School Labor Market Transit Low Jobs Environmental Poverty Pro�ficiency Transportation Proxim*t Index Index 1 y Health Index Index Index Cost Index index Oceanside Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 53.73 50.45 45.6 86.58 65.37 46.16 42.91 Black.,Non-Hispanic 50-82 49.21 40.33 87.26 65.64 43.06 41.48 Hispanic 45.20 42.52 36�.15 87.80 67.19 38.18 40.28 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-HIspanic 53.49 51.54 43.13 86�.59 63.23 42.73 43.03 Native American,Non-Hispanic 48.60 43.64 39.83 87.25 67.76 46.11 41.52 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-HIspanic 46.73 42.01 39.93 88.36 69.82 47.45 41.82 Black,Non-Hispanic 38.33 33.45 31.98 90.09 73.53 46.19 42-61 Hispanic 35.87 30.17 32.26 89.42 72.41 43.46 37.40 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 51.67 50.85 39.48 87.25 61.54 41-53 43-14 Native American,Non-Hispanic 39.13 30.18 38.02 84.62 65.63 52-66 38.89 San Diego Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 67.86 67.39 75.24 89.49 74.41 53�.52 43�.16 Black,Non-Hispanic 42.82 43.19 40.74 88.67 76.29 44.98 34.94 Hispanic 38.13 40.6�5 39.45 89.92 76.98 44.50 31.79 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 62.52 60.38 63.70 90.04 72.16 45.25 43.20 Native American,Non-Hispanic 56.84 5 5.6�2 58.86 87.99 77.15 52.11 36.63 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-Hispanic 57.16 6�0.31 68.63 91.72 79.98 55.53 37.76 B.1ack,Non-Hispanic 28.86 37.4 32.76 92.71 81.27 45.64 28.50 Hispanic 25.68 36.41 31.20 91.36 80.07 43.14 28.27 Asian or Paci.fic Islander,Non-Hispanic 56.10 57.91 62.52 92.72 80.36 50.92 37.26 Native American,Non-Hispanic 31.81 52.90 52.98, 93.31 86.59 54.09 26.11 Q,,11 111,��,i,?h ("'d('1" A 112 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 343 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 1'11("')UJ Table 52: Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity-Entitlement jurisdictions Low School Labor Market Transit Low Jobs Environmental Poverty Pro�ficiency Transportation Proxim*t Index Index 1 y Health Index Index Index Cost Index index San Marcos Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 51.24 80.35 44.17 86.26 58.76 57.85 47.26 Black.,Non-Hispanic 47.23 75.73 40.45 87-51 61.71 56.39 43.82 Hispanic 43.10 65.37 34.64 89.92 65.89 49�.74 36-64 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-HIspanic 45.83 78.76 44.33 86�.13 58.59 55.01 47.72 Native American,Non-Hispanic 50.14 72.69 40.00 88.018 63.59 54.76 41.49 Population below federal poverty line 01 White,Non-HIspanic 46.98 76.51 41.72 86�.01 61.55 54.93 44.75 Black,Non-Hispanic 48.95 72.59 41.78 89.36 63.89 52-96 41.71 Hispanic 36.20 58.52 33.06 91.14 69.37 45-58 33.97 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 40.97 63.27 34.36 90.16 69.26 58-82 34-83 Native American,Non-Hispanic 58.46 86.70 44.35 86.76 64.26 69.49 47.15 Santee Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 69.83 78.14 49.29 84.84 64.16 44.37 47.24 Black,Non-Hispanic 68.6�9 79.70 40.44 83.79 66.05 56.11 45.21 Hispanic 69.41 78.36 47.70 84.77 64.75 48.32 46.15 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 69.90 79.6�2 47.36 84.22 64.42 49.78 46.20 Native American,Non-Hispanic 70.35 j 77.07 1 48.44 j 84.06 j 63-91 1 413.52 47.93 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-Hispanic 6�5.71 77.7 48.15 84.63 64.63 48.01 44.73 B.1ack,Non-Hispanic 6�9.79 77.16 56.49 85.38 61.96 63.50 49.63 Hispanic 6�9.44 79.81 49.54 83.95 64.00 48.99 46.61 Asian or Paci.fic Islander,Non-Hispanic 75.16 74.24 55.79 86.75 66.23 50.10 46.26 Native American,Non-Hispanic 66.24 83.59 61.38, 81.16 59.21 30.44 53�.33 M�"'Vf U iq, 1,: Q,,11 111,��,i,?h ("'d('1" A 113 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 344 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR 1'11("')UJ Table 52: Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity-Entitlement jurisdictions Low School Labor Market Transit Low Jobs Environmental Poverty Pro�ficiency Transportation Proxim*t Index Index 1 y Health Index Index Index Cost Index index Vista Total Population White,Non-Hispanic 42.50 45.98 33.25 87.97 66.11 53.16 46.57 Black.,Non-Hispanic 41.84 42.91 29.49 89.43 68.67 52-55 44.7 Hispanic 37.97 32.22 26�.59 90.00 68.53 48.01 41.73 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-HIspanic 43.33 47.70 33.89 88.5 66.78 54.41 45.63 Native American,Non-Hispanic 39.87 39.52 28.71 89.24 67.84 5-3.47 43.49 Population below federal poverty line White,Non-HIspanic 39.91 39.30 30.72 88.80 67.05 50.27 45.17 Black,Non-Hispanic 30.99 49.43 34.35 89.18 67.87 55-12 45.40 Hispanic 32.99 29.16 24.82 90.26 68.64 48-35 40-60 Asian or Pacific Islander,Non-Hispanic 40.76 51.93 30.98 89.65 69.40 56-11 46-67 Native American,Non-Hispanic 39.96 24.06 26�.20 89.68 65.39 51-54 51-34 S(,)Ltrcc-Affirrnativcly Furthcring Fair I 10USIng(AFF1 1),Data and Mapping Tool(Al"I"11'1 2017 114 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 345 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR The following tables indicate similar opportunity ch aracteri s,tics for the Urban County jurisdictions. As shown in Table 53, the cities of Imperial Beach (19.0 percent) and Lemon Grove (13.8 percent) had the highest population ratio below the poverty level. In the Urban County, generally American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black or African American residents had the highest poverty rates compared to other racial/ethnic groups,. According to Table 54, a large percentage of schools in Imperial Beach,Lemon Grove and Solano,Beach are considered Title I schools, and help low-achieving children meet state standards in core academic subjects. These schools coordinate and integrate resources and services from federal, state, and local sources.To be considered for Title 1 school funds', at least 40 percent of the students, must be considered low-income. When considering labor market participation, the unemployment rates of the Urban County show that the cities of Imperial Beach and Lemon Grove had slightly higher unemployment rates than overall San Diego County (2.8 percent). Table 54 shows that the majority of Urban County city residents had commutes under 30 minutes. AllTransit explores metrics that reveal the social and economic impact of transit, specifically looking at connectivity,access to jobs,and frequency of service. According to the data provided,the cities of Lemon Grove (7.9), Imperial Beach (6.7), and Coronado (6.6) scored the highest, illustrating a moderate combination of trips per week and number of jobs accessible that enable a moderate number of people to take transit to work (Table 55). "01' A 115 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 346 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR Table 53: Opportunity Indicator- Poverty Rate�-Urban County Participating jurisdictions Coronado Del Mar Imperial Beach Race/Ethnicity Below Percent Below Percent Below Percent Total Poverty Below Total Povert Below Total Poverty Below PovertV y Povert Poverty Level Level Level Level y Level Level Population for whom poverty status is 201330 1.1082 5.3% 4.1321 300 6.9% 2701 5)117 19�.0% determined White alone 185610 961 5.2'Yo 4)146 274 6.60/() 19�203 3)636 18.9% Black.orAfrican 188 11 5.9'Yo 21 0 0.0�0/0 1)0�67 334 31.3% American alone American Indian and 53 0 0.01Y0 0 0 - 317 72 22.7Yo Alaska Native alone Asian alone 613 44 7.2%� 112 26 23.2% 2)206 304 13.8% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 23 0 0.0 O/o� 0 0 - 195 0 0.01Y(.) alone Some other race alone 150 12 8.0(yo 0 0 13524 231 15.2% Two or more races 693 54 7.8%� 42 0 0.0 O/o 2)489 540 21.7% Lemon Grove Poway Solana Beach Race/Ethnicity Below Percent Below Percent Below Percent Total Poverty Below Total Poverty Below Total Poverty Below Level Poverty Level Poverty Level Poverty Level Level Level Population for whom Poverty status is 26)422 3)646 13.8% 49)1353 3)33,1 6.7% 1V40 656 4.9'Y(,.) determined White alone 17)161 1.1879 10.9% 37)575 21390 6A(Yo 11J48 454 4.1(Vo Black or African .American alone 3.1547 827 23.3% 607 55 9.1(Yo 81 14 17.3�0 .American Indian and Alaska Native alone 146 82 56�.2% 461 219 47.5 VC) 120 24 20.0�0 Asian alone 1.1527 104 6.8% 6.1480 263 4.1(Yo 685 75 10.9�0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 122 22 18.0% 18 0 0.0(Yo alone Some other race alone 21205 247 11.2 0/o 11670 231 13.8% 614 32 5.2% Two or more races 1.1714 485 28.3% 2.1542 173 6.8(Yo 692 57 8.2(Vo Source:American Community SunTey 2013-2017,S 170 1 'Z M�'Vf U [1 N, I? i"1, 1; Q,i ly"'I"1,�,i'? (",A)" 116 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 347 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR 11(")IJ Table 54: Opportunity Indicators�- School Proficiency, Labor Market,job Proximity- Urban County Participating jurisdictions Opportunity Coronado Del Mar Imperial Lemon Poway Solana Indicator Beach Grove Beach School Proficiency Total Title I Schools 1 1 5 5 4 3 Total Schools 5 2 6 5 12 4 (Yt)of Schools 20.0% 50.0% 83.30/() 100.00/0 33.3% 75.0% Unemployment Rate Annual Rate 2.20/() 1.50/() 3.50/() 3.20/() 2.2% 1.4% job Proximity <29 mins. 79.3% 75.7% 51.5% 63.7% 59.6% 70.5% 30-59 mins. 16.2% 16.0% 41.8% 29.2% 35.3% 24.6% 60 mins.or more 4.5% 8.3% 6.7% 7.1'Vo 5.1% 4.9%] Source:California Department of Education,Public Schools and Districts Data File 18-19,Feb 2020;American Community Survey 2013-20175 S0801;CalEn,viroScreen 3.0 Results Uune 2018 Update). Table 5�5: Opportunity Indicators -Transit Urban County Participating jurisdictions All Transit Transit Tr* s Per jobs Commuters ip Transit Routes Performance Week within 1/2 Accessible in Who Use 0 Score Mile 30-min t * Transit within 1/2 Mile rip Coronado 6.6 916 86)924 2.30% 1 Del Mar 5.1 738 58)060 0.03% 2 Imperial Beach 6.7 1.1188 31)400 4.25% 3 Lemon Grove 7.9 11274 751237 4.45% 5 Poway 3.1 432 151312 1.29% 2 Solano."each 5.9 950 681617] 2.02% 3 Source:hup s:,.Z,Z all tran sit.cnt.orgZmetrics/�,accessed March 13,2020. Continuing the analysis of Urban County jurisdictions for which the HUD Environmental Health Index was not provided, the Environmental Health Screening tool (CalEnviroScreen) was used. The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) developed a screening methodology to help identify California communities disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution called the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen). In addition to environmental factors (pollutant exposure, groundwater threats, toxic sites, and hazardous materials exposure) and sensitive receptors (seniors, children, persons with asthma, and low birth weight infants), CalEnviroScreen also takes into consideration socioeconomic factors. These factors include educational attainment'. linguistic isolation, poverty, and unemployment. Research has shown a heightened vulnerability of people of color and lower socioeconomic status to environmental pollutants. Table 56 shows the Urban County's CalEnviroScreen scores by census tract in Urban County Jurisdictions. High scoring communities tend to be more burdened by pollution from multiple sources and most vulnerable to its effects, taldng into account their socioeconomic characteristics and underlying health status. As expected, the areas indicated as having higher EnviroScreen scores generally matched the geographic distribution of minorities, low- and moderate-income persons, and,poverty concentrations. "01, A 117 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 348 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AiR Table 56: Opportunity Indicators -Environmental Health- Urban County Participating Jurisdictions Urban County Census Tract Total Population CES 3.0 Score 6�073021600 3391 13.59 6�073011000 2799 6.18 6�073021800 2022 5.73 6�073010800 2390 5.70 Coronado 6073010900 1750 4.77 6073011100 3698 4.71 6073010601 2127 4.67 6073009902 2 NA 6073017029 8823 7.62 6073017306 2818 3.69 Del Mar 6073017200 4146 2.89 6073008324 660�O 2.11 6073010402 5558 30.50 6073010502 5514 24.30 6073010200 6800 23.76 Imperial Beach 6073010300 4507 23.55 6073010401 2458 19.82 6073010501 1433 15.27 6073014400 3523 39.22 6073014300 3618 31.85 6073014001 4630 24.52 Lemon Grove 6073014200 6277 23.65 6073014101 3507 20.27 6073014002 4488 19.38 6073017049 2919 16.25 6073017048 6123 13.73 6073017009 4024 10.78 6073017040 4363 9.05 6073017020 3694 8.58 Poway 6073017010 3152 8.17 6073017054 5810 6.87 6�073017041 6147 6.18 6�073017053 3364 5.01 6�073017006 2876 3.73 6�073017304 5508 12.39 Solano Beach 6�073017303 3018 6.78 6�073017305 2969 3.05 5� Source: CalEnviroScreen 3.0 Results Oune 2018 Update). "01, A 118 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 349 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P[��,'JH N4 E FT`S'� Figure 19: Environmental Exposure 7-77�� ........... ............... �!��v'r S'14", 'C v ,7�, 'rO KSI�' d 10, IV,9 L enTe'r- rx rl i`b""' Solana B Del M CalEnvi'roScreen Scores Lowest Hi,gbest Score-- Scores Each,co/or represents 109vo of the scores Blonk=No Do ta Sal Coldornia Communities Environmental Health ScreeningTool(CaffnviroScreen) Low and Moderate Income Areas Free,ways Colunty Boundary Imperm Beach M City Boundaries M/M" Community Boun darfes F 'Z. PIRXY["'111 J,'l 119 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 350 of 768 LE 11, 1 N`G PRACTICES AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS,To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE .,,Akey aspect of fair housing choice is equal access to credit for the purchase or improvement of a ,,,home, particularly in light of the recent lending/credit crisis. This chapter reviews the lending practices of financial institutions and the access to financing for all households, particularly minority households. Lending patterns in low and moderate income neighborhoods and areas of minority concentration are also examined. However, publicly available data on lending does not contain the detailed information necessary to make conclusive statements of discrimination, but it can point out potential areas of concern. Furthermore,except for outreach and education efforts,local jurisdictions' ability to influence lending practices is limited. Such practices are largely governed by national policies and regulations. ,A. Bio�,,:tci'�k le Legislative Protection In the past, credit market distortions and other activities such as "redlining" were prevalent and prevented some groups from having equal access to credit. The Community Ikeinvestment Act(CRA) in 1977 and the subsequent Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) were designed to improve access to credit for all members of the community and hold the lender industry responsible for community lending. Comm unitlE Rein ves tm en t A ct The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) is intended to encourage regulated financial institutions to help meet the credit needs of their entire communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. Depending on the type of institution and total assets, a lender may be examined by different supervising agencies for its CRA performance. CRA ratings are provided by the Federal Reserve B�oard (FRB), Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). However, the CRA rating is an overall rating for an institution and does not provide insights regarding the lending performance at specific locations by the institution. Home N -W--%a q�rtag�evisclosure Act In tandem with the CRA,, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act requires lending institutions to make annual public disclosures of their home mortgage lending activity. Under HMDA,lenders are required to disclose information on the disposition of home loan applications and on the race or national origin, gender, and annual income of loan applicants. This section examines detailed 2012 and 2017 HMDA data for San Diego County.38 38 2017 HMDA data is the most updated lending data available that can provide consistent comparative analysis of data I from 2012. 'In 2018,the FFIEC changed the reporting format,making comparison with prior years for trends difficult. 31 120 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 351 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P[��,"Dl N4 E F"[`S'� T-IMDA data_proz)ide some insi ,g&into t0e lending_patterns tl)at exist in a community. Floivever, HMDA data are on#an indicator ofpotential roblems-the data cannot be used to conclude definite redlinin ordisctimination radices -P !9 -P due to the lack of detailed infonvation on loan terms or s ia pec�ic reasonsfor den* Z Con ven,tion a]vers us Go vernm en t-Ba cked Fin,an, " Conventional financing involves market-rate loans provided by private lending institutions such as banks, mortgage companies, savings and loans, and thrift institutions. To assist lower and moderate income households that may have difficulty in obtaining home mortgage financing in the Private market due to income and equity issues, several government agencies offer loan products that have below market interest rates,and are insured ("backed"') by the agencies. Sources of government-backed financing include loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and the Rural Housing Services/Farm Service Agency (RHA/FSA). Often government-backed loans are offered to the consumers through private lending institutions. Local programs such as first-time homebuyer and rehabilitation programs are not subject to HMDA reporting requirements and therefore are not included in this analysis. Fin an cial Sta bility A c t The Financial Stability Act of 2009 established the Making Home Affordable Program,which assists eligible homeowners who can no longer afford their home with mortgage loan modifications and other options, including short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The program is targeted toward C? homeowners facing foreclosure and homeowners who are unemployed or "underwater" (i.e., homeowners who owe more on their mortgage than their home is worth). For homeowners who can no longer afford their homes but do not want to go into foreclosure, the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA) offers homeowners, their mortgage servicers, and investor incentives for completing a short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. HAFA enables homeowners to transition to more affordable housing while being released from their mortgage debt. The program also includes a "cash for keys" component whereby a homeowner receives financial as,sistance to help with relocation costs in return for vacating their property in good condition. 0.00 He] Families Save Their Homes Act p W�a The Helping Families Save Their Homes Act was passed by Congress in May 2009 and expands the Making Home Affordable Program. This Act includes provisions to make mortgage assistance and foreclosure prevention services more accessible to homeowners and increases protections for renters living in foreclosed homes. It also establishes the right of a homeowner to know who owns their mortgage and provides over two billion dollars in funds to address homelessness. Under this bill, tenants also have the right to stay in their homes after foreclosure for 90 days or through the term of their lease. Fraud Enforcement and Recoygr XAcL The Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (FERA) enhances the criminal enforcement of federal fraud laws by strengthening the capacity of federal prosecutors and regulators to hold accountable tho�se who have committed fraud. FERA amends the definition of a financial institution to include private mortgage brokers and non-bank lenders that are not directly regulated or insured by the federal C"O"I 1APIT',����"�',tz t, 121 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 352 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1�A`S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"F`S'� government, making them liable under federal bank fraud criminal statutes. The new law also makes it illegal to make a materially false statement or to willfully overvalue a property in order to manipulate the mortgage lending business. �111.j , P a t t e ri i s Overa,",11 ei 1, Data and Methodology The availability of financing affects a person's ability to purchase or improve a home. Under the HMDA, lending institutions are required to disclose information on the disposition of loan applications by the income, gender, and race of the applicants. This applies to all loan applications for home purchases, improvements, and refinancing, whether financed at market rate or with government assistance. HMDA data are submitted by lending institutions to the FFIEC. Certain data is available to the public via the FFIEC site either in raw data format or as pre-set printed reports. The analyses of HMDA data presented in this Al were conducted using Lending Patterns"'mi. Lending Patterns is a web-biased data exploration tool that analyzes lending records to produce reports on various aspects of mortgage lending. It analyzes HMDA data to assess market share, approval rates, denial rates, low/moderate income lending, and high-cost lending, among other aspects. Zn .General Overview A detailed summary of the disposition of loan applications submitted to financial institutions in 2012 and 2017 (the most recent HMDA data available) by residents (o�r prospective residents) of San Diego County can be found in Appendix B. Included is information on loan types and outcomes. In 2017, the cities of San Diego, Chula Vista, and Oceanside recorded the most loan applications, while the cities of Del Mar,Solana Beach, Coronado recorded the fewest due to the built out character of these small communities. The loan approval rates,varied somewhat by jurisdiction. Applications from the cities of Carlsbad, La Mesa,, Poway and Santee generally exhibited higher approval rates (over 67 percent). By contrast, applications from the cities of National City, Imperial Beach, and Chula Vista had slightly lower approval rates, (ranging from 57 percent to 61 percent). However, the differences are not significant. Overall, approval rates were slightly lower in 2017 than in 2012. In 2012, the cities of La Mesa, Carlsbad,and Poway recorded the highest home loan approval rates;these approval rates ranged from 74 to 76 percent. The cities with the lowest loan approval rates were the same in 2012 as in 2017 (Imperial Beach, Chula Vista, and National City, under 65 percent). However, the discrepancies in approval rates, between the high-rate and the low-rate cities have substantially narrowed since 20112. Aside from income, another ma)or impediment to securing a home loan is insufficient understanding of the homebuying and lending processes. About 14 percent of all applications countywide were withdrawn by the applicants or deemed incomplete by the financial institution in 2012. The rate of withdrawn or incomplete applications was higher in 2017 (21 percent). The highest rates of withdrawn/closed applications were seen in Lemon Grove, National City, and Solana Beach, which C"O"I 1APIT',����",',tt t, 122 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 353 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P[��,"Dl N4 E F"[`S'� are also some of the cities with the lowest approval rates. Withdrawn or closed applications can be indicative of a lack of knowledge about the homebuying and lending process. Horne Purchase Loans In 2017, a total of 37,949 households applied for conventional loans to purchase homes,in San Diego County, representing an increase of approximately 41 percent from 2012. This trend is indicative of a housing market that is slowly recovering from its peak.in 2006-2007. The approval rate countywide in 2017 for conventional home purchase loans was 64 percent, while the denial rate was 15 percent. As mentioned previously, approval rates were slightly higher in 2012. Specifically, the countywide approval rate for conventional home purchase loans was 76 percent in 2012 and the denial rate was 11 percent. When the housing market began to show signs of collapse and foreclosures were on the rise in 2007,many financial institutions instituted stricter approval criteria for potential borrowers,which caused approval rates to drop. However, as time passed, the applicant pool for mortgage lending also became smaller and increasingly selective. As an alternative to conventional home loans, potential homeowners can choose to apply for government-backed home purchase loans when buying their homes.In a conventional loan,the lender takes on the risk of losing money in the event a borrower defaults on a mortgage. For government- backed loans, the loan is insured'. either completely or partially, by the government. The government does not provide the loan itself, but instead promises to repay some or all of the money in the event a borrower defaults. This reduces the risk for the lender when making a loan. Government-backed loans generally have more lenient credit score requirements, lower downpayment requirements, and are available to those with recent bankruptcies. However, these loans may also carry higher interest rates and most require homebuyers to purchase mortgage insurance. Furthermore, government- backed loans have strict Emits on the amount a homebuyer can borrow for the purchase of a home. In competitive and high-end housing markets, many of the homes available for purchase exceed the maximum allowable loan amount. In 201 7� 13,515 San Diego County households applied for government-backed loans—comparable in terms of the number of households who applied for this type of loan in 2012 (15,141 households), but represented a lower proportion of all loan applicants in 2017. Unlike approval rates for conventional loans, the approval rate for government-backed loans increased slightly from 2012 to 2017 (from 75 percent to 77 percent). C"O"I!APIT',����"�"tz t, 123 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 354 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P[��,"Dl N4 E F"[`S'� Figure 20: Conventional Home Purchase Loans (2012 versus 2017) �ml�Dicgo Nakiu,nA Ci i hnjie�lal Btndl ................................ (Ind. ............................... .......................................... ..................................................................................... _4 00 400,K) H I 00(H) 112000 1"'1000 1(P�H) I KOO,) 2(Y A)0 -�I LAIA (�'h U 12 1 XY1[I LTIA I j t.En ri Nall ion al 'San Clororlld,i� DO Mar I d I W,Nil 11 Ois ��s c-��11�hi,k a M'.L�Sil 'N'A'�Iv n D k;g�i Sa n r L�,c I'M 3 h cak-11 G I sv L� ro�_s Fien c 11 vi Ill I ............... ............ 4,M _2 1 2410 19 7, 1448 1 iTi 2 3 V-1 6 1(1 17 1 30 2 2 Z '1221) 19796 24RO 1 2 5 5 ....................................................... ........................ 19 K.3 E 192 7-14 118�1� 131-4 1 1j 1 (,7 1 A 2 2 D 0 1"W9 M)8 1424(A 171 J� 436 2 1)7 1216 1 H 30 .2 .................................. .......................................... .............. Figure 21: G3 overnment-Backed Home Purchase Loans (2012 versus 2017) Sam Dic'up I mIx I I'd huakdl 110h V�Sja i"a i k b 1,�I I(�)(i 21000 40,00 5(h X111 4) (ADAL 1, J L�moii NAO,JaLd sxl s(olana, LI al'l�1'N��L i C j Wro)I I Dcl F](',ajon, 1"Aicirmias K11,2011"Ado I It N I c%a Pow�w SAI "Il I L!L! A a r o'vt (AU� re As' "A U1 I 20 17 49 2 320 41 5 3�4 z"Q' 1 4 -.09K 50 t I KS 7,!4 —7 M 41!il) 64,15 11111r, 1 11 �8(11 I KI 0 21 114 t" 137 ?(.0 29S I i 2 i36 13 Note: HMDA reports data based on census tract. To arrive at numbers for the unincorporated County areas, numbers for individual, cities are subtracted from the County total. However, this methodology may underestimate the lending activities in the unincorporated areas because census tracts cross Jurisdictional boundaries. Source:vv-NxT\v.lendin,(,),12atterns.com,2020 It 4 4�'1, J 124 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 355 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1�A`S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Home Improvement Loans Reinvestment in the form of home improvement is critical to maintaining the supply of safe and adequate housing. Historically,home improvement loan applications have a higher rate of denial when compared to home purchase loans. Part of the reason is that an applicant's debt-to-income ratio may exceed underwriting guidelines when the first mortgage is considered with consumer credit balances. Another reason is that many lenders use the home improvement category to report both second mortgages and equity-based lines of credit, even if the applicant's intent is to do something other than improve the home (e.g., pay for a wedding or college). Loans that will not be used to improve the home are viewed less favorably since the owner is divesting in the property by withdrawing accumulated wealth. From a lender's point of view,the reduction in owner's equity represents a higher risk. In 20171 9,621 applications for home improvement loans were submitted by San Diego County households—higher than the number of applications for this loan type in 2012 (4,205 applications). Generally,the approval rates for home improvement loans were lower than for home purchase loans. The overall approval rate for home improvement loans in both 2012 and 2017 was 60 percent. In 2012) 30 percent of these loans were denied, while 23 percent of these applications were denied in 2017. Refinan Homebuyers will refinance existing home loans for a number of reasons. Refinancing can allow homebuyers to take advantage of better interest rates,consolidate multiple debts into one loan,reduce monthly payments, alter risk (i.e. by switching from variable rate to fixed rate loans), or free up cash and capital. The majority of loan applications submitted by San Diego County households in 2017 were for home refinancing ('74,811 applications). This figure is nearly half the number of refinancing applications submitted in 20�12 (15,5,940 applications). About 58 percent of refinance applications were approved and 18 percent were denied in 2017. These approval rates represent a decrease from 2012, when 71 percent of refinance applications were approved. C". Let�,Iiding `by� Ity and The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in mortgage lending based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status or handicap (disability). It is, therefore, important to look not just at overall approval and denial rates for a jurisdiction, but also whether or not these rates vary by other factors, such as race/ethnicity. (Race/ethnicity is the only personal characteristic available from the HMDA data.) 1* Loan Applicant Representation In a perfect environment, the applicant pool for mortgage lending should be reflective of the demographics of a community,When one racial/ethnic group is overrepresented or underrepres,ented in the total applicant pool,it could be an indicator of unequal access to housing opportunities. Such a finding may be a sign that access to mortgage lending is not equal for all individuals. As shown in C"O"I 1APIT',����",',tz t, 125 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 356 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 57,throughout San Diego County,White applicants were noticeably overrepresented in the loan applicant pool, while Hispanics were severely underrep�resented. The underrepresentation of Hispanics was most acute in the cities of Escondido (-33 percent), Vista (-32 percent),Imperial Beach (-30 percent). Detailed comparisons of the applicant pool with overall demographics by jurisdiction can be found in Appendix B�. Table 57: Demographi*cs of Loan Appficants vs. Total Population Percent of Percent of Total San Diego County Applicant Pool Population Variation (2017 HMDA) (2010 Census) White 51.5% 48.5% 3.0% Black 3.1(Yo 4.70/() -1.6% Hispanic 16�.4% 32.0�% -15.6% .Asian 9.7%� 10.6% -0.9�% Other 19.2% 4.2% 15.0% Notes: I Percent of total,population estimates are based on 2017 applicant data and compared to total,population estimates from the 2010 Census. 2. Other"includes Native American,Hawaiian,MultiRace,"Unknown/NA. 3. Local jurisdiction data can be found in Appendix B. Source:Bureau of the Census,2010;wwwJendingpatterns.com,2020 Race by Income Level Table 58 summarizes lending outcomes by race/ethnicity and income in San Diego County. White applicants at all income levels generally had the highest approval rates. Similarly high approval rates were recorded for Asian applicants, although there was some variation by jurisdiction. Approval rates for Black and Hispanic applicants, however, were well below the approval rates for White and Asian applicants in the same income groups in 2012.These gaps had narrowed somewhat by 2017, but were still present.Specifically,Black applicants consistently had the lowest approval rates compared to other racial/ethnic groups in the same income groups. The largest discrepancies (between loan approval rates for White and Asian applicants versus Black and Hispanic applicants) in 2017 were recorded in the cities of El Cajon, Encinitas, and San Marcos. Detailed lending outcomes by race/ethnicity and income for each jurisdiction can be found in Appendix B. While this analysis provides a more in-depth look at lending patterns,it does not conclusively explain any of the discrepancies observed. Aside from income, many other factors can contribute to the availability of financing, including credit history, the availability and amount of a downpayment, and knowledge of the homebuying process. HMD,A data does not provide insight into these other factors. 31 126 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 357 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"F'S'� Table 58: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Income (2012-2017) Approved Denied Withdrawn/ San Diego County Incomplete 2012 2017 2012 2017 2012 2017 White Low(0-490/()AMI) 55.7% 41.6% 27.30/() 30.4% 17.00/() 27.90/o Moderate (50-79"Yo AMI) 6 5.2 O/o 54.0% 17.30/() 19.9% 17.50/() 26.0% Middle (80-119%-AMI) 69.8% 64.0% 13.3% 13.1% 16.8()/o 22.9% Upper(>-120%_AMI) 70.9% 66.9% 11.8% 11.2% 17.4()/o 21.9% Unknown/NA 75.3% 55.7% 9.60/() 13.1% 15.10/() 31.2% Black Low(()-49(,Yo AMI) 45.5% 31.7% 38.8'Vo 49.2% 15.8% 19.1% Moderate (50-79%AMI) 54.90/() 45.20/() 24.7% 27.60/() 20.5% 27.2% Middle (80-119%AMI) 61.60/() 57.50/() 19.3% 17.90/() 19.1% 24.6% Upper(>-12()%AMI) 60.6% 59.5% 19.9% 18.1(Y() 19.5% 22.5% Unknown/NA 74.3% 58.8% 9.01Y0 9.3% 16.7% 31.9% Hispanic Low(()-49(,Yo AMI) 49.2% 30.7% 31.5% 3 8.1(Yo 19.3% 31.2% Moderate(50-79(/o AMI) 57.5% 47.4% 21.7% 23.8(Yo 20.8% 28.8% Middle (80-119%AMI) 62.00/() 58.80/() 18.4% 15.40/() 19.6% 25.8% Upper(->120%AMI) 63.10/() 61.70/() 16�.2% 13.50/() 20.7% 24.8% Unknown./NA 68.9% 50.0% 12.7,Yo 14.2% 18.4 Yo 35.8()/o Asian Low(0-49%AMI) 47.4% 31.5% 34.6% 38.5% 17.9% 30.0% Moderate (50-79(/o AMI) 5 8.7(Vo 51.7% 22.3 yo 22.7% 19.0'Yo 25.6()/o Middle (80-119(/o AMI) 66.5% 58.8% 15.3,Yo 16.5% 18.2('Yo 24.7/o Upper(>-120%AMI) 70.0% 63.7% 12.4% 12.0% 17.6% 24.3% Lnknown/NA, 72.2% 48.8% 10.0% 12.3% 17.8% 38.9�% Note:Local jurisdiction data can be f(--)und in Appendix B. Source:www.lendingpatterns.com,2020. 127 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 358 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� d"I lstl_cs 1")e L' e�,tiditig Patterns b)Y,� Tract Cli vr,,� cted 1, Income Level To identify potential geographic differences in mortgage lending activities, an analysis of the HMD.A data was conducted by census tract. Based on the Census, HMDA defines the following income levels:" • Low-Income Tract-Tract Median Income less than or equal to 49 percent AMI • Moderate-Income Tract-Tract Median Income between 50 and 79 percent AMI • Middle-Income Tract-Tract Median Income between 80 and 119 percent AMI • Upper-Income Tract-Tract Median Income equal to or greater than 120 percent .AMI The vast maj�ority of census tracts in San Diego County are considered middle or upper income. Only four percent of the County's census tracts are categorized as low income by HMDA. Most loan applications were submitted by residents from one of the County's upper-inco�me tracts. Table 59 summarizes lending outcomes by the income level of the census tract where an applicant resides. In general, home loan approval rates increased and denial rates decreased as the income level of the census tract increased. Higher income households are more likely to qualify for and be approved for loans-, so this trend is to be expected. Table 59: Outcomes Based on Census Tract Income (2012-2017) Tract Income Level Total Applicants Approved Denied Other # % % # % "/0 2012 Low 9.1918 4.9% 5.146�7 3.8% 3000 10�.1% 1451 5.2%, Moderate 24,1729 12.2% 16,1207 11.2% 43860 16.4% 3662 13�.1% Middle 41,16�07 20.6�% 29,1820 20.6�% 63180 20.9% 51)607 20.0% Upper 108,1335 53.6�% 79,16�70 55.1% 131)642 46.1% 15X3 53�.5% NA 17,16�49 8.7% 13,1447 9.3% 13884 6.4% 21)318 8.3% Total 202)238 100.0% 144)611 100.0% 29)166, 100�.0% 28)061 100.0% 2017 Low 5.1818 4.3% 2.1342 2.7% 1974 9.8% 1502 5.2(Vo Moderate 14)814 10.9% 7.1918 9.1% 3)336 16.5% 31560 12.3�0 Middle 29,1765 21.9% 19,1060 21.9% 4462 22.1% 6243 21.6% Uppe 771357 56.9% 521349 6�0.3% 9519 47.2% 153489 53.7% N A 81142 6.0% 51182 6.0% 889 4.4% 21071 7.2% Total 135)896 100.0% 86)85,1 100.0% 20)180 100�.0% 28)865 100.0% A� Source:vjvv-vT.lend ingpatterns.com,2020. 39 171iese�iricc)ii,--ie (fiff.-eren,'t fic)rn,t`1,)(,)se t-ised by,, 114t J) t(,.)deteti-n.,ir),e 1(.,)w aricirm'.)derate 128 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 359 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P[��,'JH N4 E F"[`S'� Minarity PO -lation PU HMD A also records lending outcomes by the proportion of minorities residing in a census tract.Much of San Diego County is comprised of census tracts where 20 to 40 percent of residents are minorities. Table 60 summarizes lending outcomes by the proportion of minority residents in a census tract. In general, approval rates steadily increased as the proportion of minority residents decreased. Table 60: Outcomes by Minority Population of Census Tract (2012-2017) Tract Minority Total Applicants Approved Denied Other Level # % # % % % 2012 0-19%Minority 281198 13.9% 201417 72.4% 3.1875 13.7% 3)906 13.9% 20-39%Minority 77)893 38.50/() 56)1702 72.8% 10)602 13.6% 10)589 13.6% 0/() 40-590/(,,)Minority 50)590 25.01 36)1556, 72.3% 7)141 14.1% 658913 13.6% 60-79%Minority 25)291 12.50/() 17)1545 69.4% 4)119 16�.3% 35627 14.3% 80-100%Minority 20)189 10.00/6 13)1378 66�.3% 3)797 18.8% 35014 14.9% Unknown/NA 77 0.0%) 13 16.9% 32 41.6% 32 41.6% Total 202)238 100.0% 144,611 71.5% 29)566, 14.6% 28)061 13.9% 2017 0-1 9"/o Minority 12)930 9.5% 8)343 64.5% 13982 15.3% 21605 20.1(Vo 20-39%Minority 44)578 32.80/() 29)1311 65.8% 6)170 13.8% 950917 20.4% 40-59%Minority 35)988 26.50/() 23438 65.1% 5)0144 14.01% 75506 20.9% 60-79%Minority 21)213 15.60/() 13)1206, 62.3% 3)33,4 15.7% 45673 22.0% 80-100%Minority 20)591 15.20/() 12)1236, 59.4% 3)598 17.5% 45757 23.1% Unknown/NA 596 0.4% 317 53.2% 52 8.7(Yo 227 38.1�0 Total 135)8�96 100.0% 86)851 6�3.9% 20)180 14.8% 28)865 21.2% Note:NA-Minority tract percentage data was not available. Source:www.lending patterns.com,2020. Es Am Lend,eIrs L General Overview Table 61 identifies the top ten lenders in San Diego County in 2017. As shown,these top lenders were similarly active throughout most jurisdictions. In 2017, about 38 percent (39,017 applications) of all loan applications, in San Diego County were submitted to one of the County's top ten lenders. The region's top two lenders have remained fairly consistent since 2012 (Table 61).The region's remaining top lenders are all smaller financial institutions that each accounted for less than four percent of the County's market share. 129 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 360 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 61: Top San Diego County Lenders by City (2017) Top 10 Lenders Wells jp Navy Caliber jurisdiction Fargo Morgan Federal Quicken Home Loan Bank of Shore Nationstar U.S.Bank Bank, Chase Credit Loans, Loans, depot.com America, Mortgage Mortgage National NA Bank, Union Inc. Inc. NA Assoc. NA Carlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar E,l Cajon Encinitas Escondido Imperial Bch. La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Oceanside Poway San Diego San Marcos Santee Solana Beach Vista Notes: 1. Comparison only indicates if a top County lender was also a top lender in a city,and does not compare the specific order of top lenders in the County as a whole. 2. Data for just the unincorporated areas is not available Source:)xrww.]end ingpatterns.com,2,02,0. Fe S 14,,, Lend,11111" Marh,-elt According to the Federal Reserve, "prime" mortgages are offered to persons with excellent credit and employment history and income adequate to support the loan amount. "Subprime"loans are loans to borrowers who have less-than-perfect credit history, poor employment history, or other factors, such as limited income. By providing loans to those who do not meet the critical standards for borrowers in the prime market, subprime lending can and does serve a critical role in increasing levels of homeownership. Households that are interested in buying a home but have blemishes in their credit record, insufficient credit history, or non-traditional income sources may be otherwise unable to purchase a home.The subprime loan market offers these borrowers opportunities to obtain loans that they would be unable to realize in the prime loan market. S�ubprime lenders generally offer interest rates that are higher than those in the prime market and often lack the regulatory oversight required for prime lenders because they are not owned by regulated 130 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 361 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'� financial institutions. In the recent past,however,many large and well-known banks became involved in the subprime market either through acquisitions of other firms or by initiating subprime loans, directly.Though the subprime market usually follows the same guiding principles as the prime market, a number of specific risk factors are associated with this market. Subprime lending can both impede and extend fair housing choice. On the one hand, subprime loans extend credit to borrowers who potentially could not otherwise finance housing.The increased access to credit by previously underserved consumers and communities contributed to record high levels of homeownership among minorities and lower income groups. On the other hand,these loans left many lower income and minority borrowers exposed to default and foreclosure risk. Since foreclosures destabilize neighborhoods and subprime borrowers are often from lower income and minority areas, mounting evidence suggests that classes protected by fair housing faced the brunt of the recent subprime and mortgage lending market collapse.") While HMDA data does not classify loans as subprime,it does track the interest rate spread on loans. Since 2005, the Federal Reserve Board has required lenders to report rate spreads for loans whose APR was above the Treasury benchmark. Loans with a reported spread are typically referred to as higher-priced or sub�prime loans. Table 62: Reported Spread on Loans by Race/Ethnl'cl*ty (2012-2017) San Diego County Frequency�of Spread Average Spread 2012 2017 2012 2017 White 1.0%) 0.01yo 3.10 0-00 Black 1.30/6 3.6% 2.67 2.66 Hispanic 1.6 0/() 4.9% 3.41 2.87 Asian 0.5% 1.7% 2.82 2.85 Total 1.0% 3.6% 3.10, 2.86 Source:www.lendingpatterns.com,2020. As shown in Table 62, the frequency of subprime loans issued has increased over time. In 2012, approximately one percent of all loans issued had a reported spread but,by 2017, almost four percent of loans is,sued were subprime loans. What appears to be most troubling, however, is that Black and Hispanic applicants seem to be significantly more likely to receive these higher-priced loans. In 2012 and 2017, Blacks and Hispanics were twice as likely as Asians to receive a subprime loan. White applicants utilizing subprime loans were limited. Since 2012, there has been a decrease in the magnitude of spread reported on these loans. Generally, the higher the reported spread on a loan, the worse that loan is compared to a standard prime loan. In 2012, the average reported spread for a sub�prime loan was just above three p�oints; by 2017, the average reported spread had dropped to below three points. The most significant change in the reported magnitude of spread for subprime loans by race/ethnicity of the applicant was noted for White applicants. 40 Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. September 2007. "Foreclosure Exposure: A Study of Racial,andIncome Disparities in Home Mortgage Lending in 172 American Cities." 31 131 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 362 of 768 lip POLI(111111NI "U`BLIC _ES AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS,To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE "Public policies established at the regional and local levels can affect housing development, and therefore, may impact the range and location of housing choices available to residents. Fair housing laws are designed to encourage an inclusive living environment, active community participation, and an assessment of public policies.An assessment of public policies and practices can help determine potential impediments to fair housing opportunity. This section presents an overview of government regulations,policies,and practices enacted by each of the 19 Jurisdictions in San Diego County that may impact fair housing choice. I N' r Housil,10,1 ,A. Plobioiles a''n IdPrw:��)rranis Affe( tll.�J""l g 9 liae"I'l Developr�', The General Plan of a jurisdiction establishes a vision for the community and provides long-range goals and policies to guide the development in achieving that vision. Two of the eight State-mandated General Plan elements —Housing and Land Use Elements —have direct impact on the local housing market in terms of the amount and range of housing choice.The Environmental justice Element The zoning ordinance,which implements the General Plan,ts another important document that influences the amount and type of housing available in a community — the availability of housing choice. In addition, 11 jurisdictions (Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, Encinitas, Imperial Beach, National City, Oceanside, Solana Beach, City of San Diego, and unincorporated areas of San Diego County) have Local Coastal Plans that also play a significant role in affordable housing in the Coastal Zone of each jurisdiction. 1, Housing Element Law and Compliance As one of the eight State-mandated elements of the local General Plan, the Housing Element is the only element with specific statutory requirements and is subject to review by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for compliance with State law. Enacted in 1969, Housing Element law requires that local governments adequately plan to meet the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community. The law acknowledges that for the private market to adequately address housing needs and demand, local governments must adopt land use plans and regulatory systems that provide opportunities for and do not unduly constrain housing development. Specifically, the Housing Element must: Identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards, with services and facilities needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of tVt)es of housing for all income levels in order to meet the community's housing goals; �5:PUBI 11(",P0 ,1 111"ll,'S 132 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 363 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� • Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low,very low, low'. and moderate income households-" • Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance,improvement,and development of housing, including housing for all income levels and housing for persons with disab�ilities; • Conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable housing sto�ck; and, • Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing throughout the community or communities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry,national origin,color, familial status, or disability, and other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, or any other state and federal fair housing laws. Specifically in 2017, the State passed AB 686, requiring the next Housing Element update to include an analysis of barriers that restrict access to opportunity and a commitment to specific meaningful actions to affirmatively furthering fair housing. Compliance Status Table 6�3 summarizes the Housing Element compliance status of jurisdictions in San D�iego County. A Housing Element found by HCD to be in compliance with State law is presumed to have adequately addressed its policy constraints. According to HCD, all 19 Ho�using Elements for participating jurisdictions (including the County) for the fifth cycle (2013-2020 are in compliance. A number of jurisdictions have begun updating the Housing Element for the sixth cycle (2021-2029). As part of the 2021-2029 update, each jurisdiction must demonstrate that it has capacity to meet its housing needs, as determined by S�ANDAG and HCD. Each jurisdiction is allocated its share of housing during the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) process, which identifies the number of housing units each jurisdiction must accommodate by providing adequate sites. As of February 2020, the cities of Coronado, Imperial Beach, Lemon Grove, and Solana Beach had requested reductions in the number of housing units they must accommodate under the RHNA allocation for the 2021-2029 Housing Element cycle. 41 Under the State Housing Element law,the income categories are: extremely low income (30 percent AMI);very low income (50 percent AMI);low income (80 percent AMI);moderate income (120 percent AMI);and above moderate income (greater than 12,0 percent AM1). �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 133 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 364 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"F'S'� Table 63: Housing Element Status for 2013-2021 Cycle jurisdiction Document Status Compliance Status [Carlsbad Adopted In Chula Vista Adopted In Coronado Adopted In Del Mar Adopted In El Cajon Adopted In Encinitas Adopted In Escondido Adopted In Imperial Beach Adopted In La Mesa Adopted In Lemon Grove Adopted In National City Adopted In Oceanside Adopted In Poway Adopted In San Diego (CiqT) Adopted In San Diego (County) Adopted In San Marcos Adopted In Santee Adopted In Solana Beach Adopted In Vista Adopted In Source:Department of Housing and Community Development,State of California, April 2020. 2. San Diego Forward: Regional Plan SANDAG adopted San Diego Forward: Regional Plan in 2015. Updated periodically, the Regional Plan serves as the long-term planning framework for the San Diego region.It provides a broad context in which local and regional decisions can be made that move the region toward a sustainable future— a future with more choices and opportunities for all residents of the region. The Regional Plan better integrates San Diego's local land use and transportation decisions and focuses attention on where and how the region wants to grow. The Regional Plan contains an incentive-based approach to encourage and channel growth into existing and future urban areas and smart growth communities. SANDAG is in the process of updating the Regional Plan with adoption anticipated in 2021. 3. Land Use Element The Land Use Element of a General Plan designates the general distribution, location, and extent of uses for land planned for housing, business, industry, open space, and public or community facilities. As it applies to housing, the Land Use Element establishes a range of residential land use categories, specifies densities (typically expressed as, dwelling units per acre [du/ac],), and suggests the types of housing appropriate in a community. Residential development is implemented through the zoning districts and development standards specified in the jurisdiction's zoning ordinance. 1-111'Ak 1 1 1�1'�R�5:P 1��13 1 11(,",P0 ,1 1,(",1, S 134 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 365 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� A 4o Residential Densities Many factors, governmental and non-governmental, affect the supply and cost of housing in a local housing market. The governmental factor that most directly influences these market conditions is the allowable density range of residentially designated land. In general, higher densities allow developers to take advantage of economies of scale, reduce the per-unit cost of land and improvements, and reduce developments costs associated with new housing construction. Reasonable density standards ensure the opportunity for higher-density residential uses to be developed within a community, increasing the feasibility of producing affordable housing, and offer a variety of housing options that meet the needs of the community. Minimum required densities in multi-family zones ensure that land zoned for multi-family use, the supply of which is often limited, will be developed as efficiently as possible for multi-family uses. Table 6�4 presents a summary of allowable densities by land use type for jurisdictions in the San Diego region. While most 'jurisdictions have Land Use Elements that allow a range of single-family (0-14 du/ac) and multi-family (6-30+ du/ac) residential uses,Del Mar and Poway due to the characteristics of existing residential neighborhoods,, do not accommodate multi-family uses at a density greater than 20 du/ac without a density bonus or other incentive for affordable housing. As a part of its 2013-2,021 Housing Element, the City of Del Mar committed to redesignating two vacant properties in the North Commercial (NC) zone to allow residential development at a density of 20 units per acre or greater. In addition to the land use re-designation noted above, the City of Del Mar also plans to pursue amendments to the North Commercial (NC) and Professional Commercial (PC) zones expanding the list of uses allowed by right to include residential uses at a density of 20 units per acre for projects that include an affordable housing component. The City has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to address the proposed re-designation, and the City Council will consider the amendments after the public review period closes in February 2020. To provide adequate sites for affordable housing development, an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ) was established in the Poway Zoning Code for Low Income (AH-L) and Moderate Income (AH-M) households. In 2012, placement of an AHOZ designation was completed on six publicly- owned sites. An AHOZ may be applied to property within any land use category, including non- residential categories, not including the Open Space or Rural Residential categories. The Poway Municipal Code (PMC)was also amended in 20�12 to provide development incentives on AHOZ sites to encourage affordable housing that is consistent with State law. Development incentives include allowing densities up to 30 dwelling units per acre on properties that have the AHOZ applied on them. All jurisdictions have very low or no minimum density requirements in their General Plan Land Use Elements for at least some of their re sidentially-zoned land. State law requires a local government to make a finding that a density reduction, rezoning, or downzoning is consistent with its Housing Element prior to requiring or permitting a reduction of density of a parcel below the density used in determining Housing Element compliance.The legi.slation also allowed courts to award attorneys'fees and, costs if the court determines that the density reduction or downzoning was made illegally. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 135 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 366 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 64: Typical Land Use Categories and Permitted Density by jurisdiction Generalized Density Typical Residential Chula Land Use Range Type Carlsbad Vista Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas (By Density) (du/ac) Single-family Very low-dcnsity Estate/Rural <1 unit housing where per acre agricultural is predominant Single-family Very Low 0-1 homes on large lots in rural areas Single-family Low 1-3 homes on large lots Single-family Medium 3-6 homes on medium-sized lots High 6-14 Smaller single- family homes Multi-Family Town homes, duplexes, Low 6-15 condominiums, 0 and small sinLyle- CD story a artmenLZ5 One and two- Medium 15-20 story apartment 0 complexes Two and three- High 20-30 story apartment 0 complexes Large multi-story Very High 30-50 apartment and condo complexes I livh-rise Special I ligh 50+ apartment and 1 1 condo complexes Source: General Plan Land Use Elements for jurisdictions in San Diego County (February,2020). Note: This table represents a summary of typical land use categories,as defined by density.These categories are not necessarily representative of a specific jurisdiction's General Plan Land Use categories.Instead,they are meant to provide an overview of the type of land uses and densities permitted in that jurisdiction.The squares identify a jurisdiction as supporting land use densities within the identified range(according to the General Plan's Land Use Element).However,a jurisdiction's land use category might not include all the densities listed in that range.For example, a jurisdiction's Multi-Family Very High density category might support densities from 21 to 35 du/ac,but the High and Very H1 categories have been marked with.a square since the range covers both categories. 1-111 Ak 1",71"1 1�1'�R�5:P 1��13 1 11(,",P 0,1 1,(",1, S 136 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 367 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 64: Typical Land Use Categories and Permitted Density by jurisdiction Generalized Density Typical Residential Escon- Imperial Lemon National Ocean- Land Use Range Type dido Beach La Mesa Grove city side (By Density) u/ac) Single-family Very low-dcnsity E,statc/Rural <1 unit housing where per acre agricultural is edominant Singje-family Very Low 0-1 homes on large lots in rural areas Singje-family Low 1-3 homes on large 0 lot-c t10 Single-family Medium 3-6 homes on 0 medium-sized lots High 6-14 Smaller single- 0 family homes Multi-Family Town homes, duplexes, Low 6-15 condominiums, and small single- CD story apartments One and two- Medium 15-20 story apartment c omplexe ves Two and three- High 20-30 story apartment complexes Large multi-story Very I ligh 30-50 apartment and condo complexes I ligh-rise pe ial I ligrh 50+ apartment and condo com2lexes Source: General Plan Land Use Elements for jurisdictions in San Diego County (February,2020). Note: This table represents a summary of typical land use categories,as defined by density.These categories are not necessarily rePresentative of a specific jurisdiction's General Plan Land Use categories.Instead,they are meant to provide an ovenTiew of the type of land uses and densities permitted in that jurisdiction.The squares identify a jurisdiction as supporting land use densities within the identified range(according to the General Plan's Land Use Element.).However,a jurisdiction's land use category might not include all the densities listed in that range.For example, a jurisdiction's Multi-Family Very High density category might support densities from 21 to 35 du/ac,but the High and Very H1 categories have been marked with a square since the range covers both categories. 1-111 Ak 1",71"1 1�1'�R�5:P 1��13 1 11(,",P 0,1 1,(",1, S 137 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 368 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 64: Typical Land Use Categories and Permitted Density by jurisdiction Generalized Density Typical Residential San San San Solana Land Use Range Poway* Diego Diego Santee Vista (By Density) (du/ac) Type (City)* (County)* Marcos Beach Single-family Very low-dcnsity E,statc/Rural <1 unit housing where per acre agricultural is edominant Singje-family Very Low 0-1 homes on large lots in rural areas Singje-family Low 1-3 homes on large lot-c t10 Single-family Medium 3-6 homes on medium-sized lots High 6-14 Smaller single- family homes Multi-Family Town homes, duplexes, Low 6-15 condominiums, and small single- CD story apartments One and two- Medium 15-20 story apartment complexes Two and three- Higb 20-30 story apartment complexes Large multi-story Very I ligh 30-50 apartment and condo complexes I ligh-rise pe ial I ligrh 50+ apartment and condo com2lexes Source: General Plan Land Use Elements for jurisdictions in San Diego County(February 2020). Note: This table represents a summary of typical land use categories,as defined by density.T'hese categories are not necessarily representative of a specific jurisdiction's General,Plan Land Use categories.Instead,they are meant to provide an overview of the type of land uses and densities permitted in that jurisdiction.The squares identify a jurisdiction as supporting land use densities within the identified range(according to the General Plan's Land Use Element.).However,a)urisdiction's land use category might not include all the densities listed in that range.For example,a jurisdiction's Multi-Family Very High density category might support densities from 21 to 35 du/ac,but the High and Very Hi categories have been marked with a square since the range covers both categories. *Indicates jurisdiction,with very low,or no minimum density standards in,land use or zoning ordinance. f1i Ak 1",71"1 1�1'�R�5:P 1��13 1 11(,",P 0,1 1,(",1, S 138 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 369 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'� i.tmt�ice Z("Y'll"Iffig Orde The zoning ordinance implements the General Plan by establishing zoning districts that correspond with General Plan land use designations. Development standards and permitted uses in each zoning district are specified to govern the density, type, and design of different land uses for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare (Government Code, Sections 65800�-65863)�. The Fair Housing Act does not pre-empt local zoning laws. However, the Act applies to municipalities and other local government entities and prohibits them from making zoning or land use decisions or implementing land use policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate against Protected persons, including individuals with disabilities.Another way that discrimination in zoning and land use may occur is when a seemingly neutral ordinance has a disparate impact, or causes disproportional harm, to a protected group. Land use policies such as density or design requirements that make residential development prohibitively expensive, limitations on multi-family housing, or a household occupancy standard may be considered discriminatory if it can be proven these policies have a disproportionate impact on minorities-, families with children, or people with disabilities. Several aspects of the zoning ordinance that may affect a person's access to housing or limit the range of housing choices available are described below.As part of the Housing Element update,jurisdictions are required to evaluate their land use policies, zoning provisions, and development regulations and make proactive efforts to mitigate any constraints identified. However, the following review is based on the current zoning ordinances as of the writing of this Al. le Definition of Family A community's zoning ordinance can potentially restrict access to housing for households failing to qualify as a "family" by the definition specified in the zoning ordinance. For instance, a landlord may refuse to rent to a "nontraditional" family based on the zoning definition of a family." A landlord may also use the definition of a family as an excuse for refusing to rent to a household based on other hidden reasons, such as household size. Even if the code provides a broad definition, deciding what constitutes a "family" should be avoided by jurisdictions to prevent confusion or give the impression of restrictiveness. California court caseS13 have ruled that a definition of"family" that: 1) limits the number of persons in a family; 2) specifies how members of the family are related (i.e. by blood, marriage or adoption, etc.), or (3) defines a group of not more than a certain number of unrelated persons as a single housekeeping unit is invalid. Court rulings stated that defining a family does not serve any legitimate or useful objective or purpose recognized under the zoning and land planning powers of the jurisdiction, and therefore violates rights of privacy under the California Constitution. A zoning ordinance also cannot regulate residency by discriminating between biologically related and unrelated persons. Furthermore, a zoning provision cannot regulate or enforce the number of persons constituting a family. 42 Most Zoning Ordinances that define families limit the definition to two or more individuals related by kinship, marriage,adoption,or other legally recognized custodial,relationship. 43 City of Santa Barbara v. Adamson (1980),City of Chula Vista v.Pagard (1981),among others. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 139 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 370 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� The cities of Carlsbad (2011), Del Mar (2014), National City (2011) and San Marcos (2012) amended or removed the definition of"family" from their zoning ordinances. As of February 2020, only the City of Solana Beach includes a definition of "family" in its zoning ordinance that constitutes a potential impediment to fair housing choice.The City defines"family"as "Two or more persons living together as a bona fide single housekeeping unit.This definition of a family excludes individuals. Such a definition can be considered an impediment because it may give landlords the opportunity to deny renting single-family or multi-family dwelling units to single persons. 0 I Density Bonus Ordinance California Government Code Section 65915 includes requirements for local governments to provide density bonuses and incentives for housing developers that agree to develop affordable housing units. Density bonus requirements are regularly updated at the state level and must then be adopted by local jurisdictions to comply with state law. The most recent changes to California density bonus law went into effect in January 2020. Because of this, while most San Diego County Jurtsdicti.ons have density bonus provisions in their zoning ordinances, all cities and the County of San Diego must review their regulations to ensure they continue to remain in compliance with state law. 3. Parking Requirements Communities that require an especially high number of parking spaces per dwelling unit can negatively impact the feasibilityof producing affordable housing by reducing the achievable number of dwelling units per acre, increasing development costs, and thus restricting the range of housing types constructed in a community. Typically, the concern for high parking requirements is limited to multi- family, affordable, or senior housing. The basic parking standards for jurisdictions in San Diego County are presented in Table 65. Many jurisdictions offer reductions in parking requirements in conjunction with density bonuses for affordable and senior housing. Most jurisdictions in the county have comparable parking requirements. However, Coronado, Imperial Beach,La Mesa, and Lemon Grove have parl-cing standards for multi-family uses that do not distinguish between parking required for smaller units (one or two bedrooms) and larger units (three or more bedrooms). Because smaller multi-family units are often the most suitable type of housing for seniors and persons with disabilities, requiring the same number parldng spaces as larger multi- family units can be a constraint on the construction of units intended to serve these populations. Several of these cities, however, do offer reduced parking standards for housing projects serving specific populations, such as senior housing or affordable housing projects. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 14,0 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 371 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P[��,'JH N4 E F"[`S'� Table 65: Off-Street Parking Requirements MF Junisdictions SF 1br 2br 3br 4+br Guest Space ADU Carlsbad 2 1.51 2 2 2 0.25 to 0.32 __3 Chula Vista 24 1.5 2 2 2 1 Coronad05 26 2 2 2 2 3 Del Mar 27 1 2 2 3 0.25 1 El Cajon 2 1.5 2 2 2 0.258 1 Encinitas 2 to 39 2 2 2.5 2.5 0.25 1 Escondido 2 1.5 1.75 2 2 0.25 1 Imperial Beachl() 2 1.5-2 1.5-2 1.5-2 1.5-2 2 La Mesa 211 2 2 2 2 4/10 Lemon Grove 2 2 2 2 2 0.25 1 National City 212 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.513 1 Oceanside 214 1.5 2 2 2 0.1 to 0.2515 Poway 2 1.5 to 1.75 2.25 2.75 to 3 2.75 to 3 1 San Diego City 16 2 1.0 to 1.75 1.75 to 2.25 2.0 to 2.5 2.0 to 2.5 __17 1 San Diego County 2 1.5 1.5 2 2 0.2 1 San Marcos 218 1.5 2 2 2 0.33 1 Santee 2 1.5 2 2 2 0.25 Solana Beach 2 1.5 2 2 2 0.25 1 Vista 219 2 2 2.5 2.5 0.3320 1 *Notes:ADU-accessory dwelling unit;bdrm bedroom L Within the Village outside the Coastal Zone,parking required is 1.0 space per studio or one-bdrm unit and 1.5 spaces per unit with two or more bdrms. 2. For projects'Lip to 10 units,required guest parking is 0.3 spaces per unit;0.25 spaces per unit for projects larger than 10 units. 3. Park-ing for the primary unit also serves the ADU. 4. 1.0 additional space required for each bdrm over four b,drms. 5. For multiple-family dwellings in the R-5 Zone and affordable housing,1.5 spaces per dwelling unit are required.For senior housing, L0 parking space is required for each dwelling unit. 6. For houses over 5,000 sf,1.0 additional,uncovered space is required. 7. For single-family,dwellings with three or more bedrooms, 1.0 additional on-site parkang space is required, including 2.0 garage park-ing spaces. 8. L0 visitor space per unit is required in the RM-6000 zone. 9�. 3.0 spaces required for dwelling units in excess of 2,500 square feet. 10. Residential units in the R-1-600�O�,R-1-3800)R-15001 R-2000)R-3000,and R-3000-D zones require 2.0 spaces per unit(including ADUs,where allowed);and residential dwelling units in the C-1,C-2,C-3,MU-1 and MU-2 zones require 1.5 spaces per unit. 11. 5.0 spaces required on lots with long driveways and panhandle/casement access lots. 12. 3.0 spaces required per dwelling unit for units with more than 2,500 square feet in floor area,plus 1.0 space per bdrm proposed over four bdrms. 13. Additional 0.25 spaces for each.unit over 20. 14. For inland and downtown D,Districts,3.0 spaces are required for houses over 2,500 sf 15. For multifamily projects with four to 10 units,1.0 space per unit is required. For projects with more than 10 units, 1.0 space per unit plus 20 percent of the total number of units is required. 16. 1.0 space per bdrm required for single dwellings with five or more bdrms in campus impact areas. 1.0 space per bdrm, less 1.0 space also required per occupant age'18 and over in high.occupancy single dwellings.Lower range of multi.-family requirement is for units in transit areas or lower income units.Higher range of multi-family requirement is for units in parking impact areas. 17. Guest spaces are required at a rate of 15-20 percent of total units with Planned Development Permits in specified communities. 18. Dwellings over 3,000 sf required three spaces, 19. Plus 2.0-2.5 guest spaces in,semi-rural subdivisions. 20. For units with two or more bdrms,0.5 guest space per unit is required. 1-111'Ak 1 1 1�1'�R�5:P 1��13 1 R",P0 ,1 r 1,(",1,11'�S 14,1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 372 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� A 4o Sho�r,t-Term Rentals The rising popularity of home-sharing websites such as Airbnb and HomeAway in recent years has led to significant increases in homes being offered on a short-term basis to generate rental income. Homes may be offered as "home-shares," where the primary resident offers one or more rooms to visitors while remaining on site, or whole homes may be rented on a daily or weekly basis. Short-term rentals are particularly popular in coastal locations, which have a robust demand for tourist accommodations. While the impact of short-term rentals on housing availability and affordability is still being evaluated, there is evidence that short-term rentals have a negative effect on housing affordability by changing the way residential properties are used and reducing housing availability for local residents. San Diego jurisdictions vary in their approach to short-term rentals. The cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista'. Del Mar, Encinitas-, Imperial Beach, Oceanside, and Solana Beach explicitly allow short-term rentals in at least some zones. With the exception of Imperial Beach, these cities require permits for short-term rentals, and specify that short-term rentals must meet various performance standards to be allowed to operate. The City of Lemon Grove does not allow entire homes to be used as short-term rentals but does permit home-sharing with a permit. Other jurisdictions, including the cities of El Cajon, Escondido, La Mesa, National City, Poway, San Marcos,, Santee, and Vista, and the County of San Diego, do not explicitly address short-term rentals in their adopted regulations; however, the County of San Diego requires short-term rentals to pay transient occupancy taxes. The Santee City Council considered developing regulations for short-term rentals at an April 2019 meeting, but determined that due to the low number of rentals in Santee and lack of complaints to date about their o�peratio�ns,additional regulations were not necessary at the time. As of February 2020, there was no consensus on the status or appropriate manner of regulating short- term rentals in the City of San Diego. While the most recent (2017) City Attorney opinion on short- term rentals notes that they are prohibited in single-family residential zones as a"commercial use"and not specifically defined or expressly permitted in any other zone. In response to the City Attorney's opinion, the San Diego City Council adopted an ordinance allowing short-term rentals with permits in some zones, but rescinded the new regulations in October 2018. While the City Council has expressed a desire to adopt clear regulations for short-term rentals, as of the writing of this report there have been no new regulations put in place and short-term rentals in the City of San Diego continue to operate in a legal grey area. The City of Coronado prohibits "transient rentals,"including short-term rentals, in residential zones. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 14,2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 373 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� gr Opport'L'1111,ty C. Variet of L"I�.S1,1"I Y ........................................................... To ensure fair housing choice in a community, a zoning ordinance should provide for a range of housing types, including single-family, multi-family, second dwelling units, mobile homes, licensed community care facilities, employee housing for seasonable or migrant workers as necessary, assisted living facilities, emergency shelters, supportive housing, transitional housing, and single room occupancy (SRO) units. Table 66 provides a summary of each jurisdiction's zoning ordinance as it relates to ensuring a variety of housing opportunities. 10 Single- and Multi-Family Uses Single- and multi-family housing types include detached and attached single-family homes, duplexes or half-plexes, townhomes, condominiums, and rental apartments. Zoning ordinances should specify the zones in which each of these uses would be permitted by right. All of the jurisdictions in San Diego County accommodate the range of residential uses described above without a use permit, although the City of Imperial Beach does require a site plan review by the Planning Commission for developments with five or more units. Zoning ordinances should also avoid "pyramid or cumulative zoning" (e.g. permitting lower-density single-family uses in zones intended for higher density multi-family uses). Pyramid or cumulative zoning schemes could limit the amount of lower-cost multi-family residential uses in a community and be a potential impediment to fair housing choice. Most jurisdictions in the San Diego region have some form of pyramid zoning and permitting single-family residential uses in multi-family zones is the most prevalent example. The cities of Coronado, Lemon Grove, Oceanside,Poway, San Marcos, and Santee prohibit single-family residential uses in higher-density, multi-family zones. Allowing or requiring a lower density use in a zone that can accommodate higher density uses is regulated by State law (SB 229�2,also known as the Dutra Bill).A local government is required to make a finding that an action that results in a density reduction, rezoning, or downzoning is consistent with its Housing Element, particularly in relation to the jurisdiction's ability to accommodate its share of regional housing needs. 2. Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory dwelling units (ADUs), also called second dwelling units or granny flats, are attached or detached dwelling units that provide complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking and sanitation. Accessory dwelling units may be an alternative source of affordable housing for lower income households, and seniors. These units typically rent for less than apartments of comparable size. California law requires local Jurisdictions to adopt ordinances that establish the conditions under which ADUs are permitted (Government Code, Section 65852.2). A jurisdiction cannot adopt an ordinance that totally precludes the development of AD�Us unless the ordinance contains findings acknowledging that allowing second units may limit housing opportunities of the region and result in adverse impacts on public health, safety, and welfare.An amendment to the State's ADU law in 2003 requires local governments to use a ministerial,rather than discretionary,process for approving ADUs �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 14,3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 374 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� (i.e.ADUs otherwise compliant with local zoning standards can be approved without a public hearing) and allows jurisdictions to count second units, towards meeting their regional housing needs goals. A ministerial process is intended to reduce permit processing time frames and development costs because proposed ADUs that are in compliance with local zoning standards can be approved without a public hearing. All jurisdictions in the county currently permit second dwelling units via a variety of review processes such as a zoning clearance or an administrative permit in at least some zones. Imperial Beach is the only jurisdiction with adopted findings allowing it to preclude second units. Second units are allowed by-right within the City's R-3000, R-2000, and R-1 500 residential zones. However, the City Council determined that allowing second units in R1-6,000 and R1-3,800 zones is not in the best interest of public health, safety, and welfare and adopted findings to preclude second units in those zones. 3. Mobile Home Parks Provisions for mobile home parks vary among the San Diego County jurisdictions. Some jurisdictions have designated mobile home park zones specifically to provide for this type of housing (Carlsbad, Chula Vista,La Mesa,National City,Oceanside,Poway,San Marcos,and Vista).The City of Encinitas provides for mobile home parks in its Mobile Home Park zone, and in higher density zones upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit-, while the City of San Diego has a mobile home park overlay zone to preserve existing sites. Other jurisdictions allow mobile home parks in some residential zones with a Conditional Use Permit or Site Development Permit (Escondido, Imperial Beach, Cityof San Diego,Poway, San Diego County, Santee,and Solana Beach). El Cajon, Santee and Vista have Mobile Home Park Overlay Zones that permit new mobile home parks and the expansion of current parks with a CUP or Site Development Plan. Coronado, Del Mar, and Lemon Grove have no provisions for mobile home parks in their Zoning Ordinances. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 14,4 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 375 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 66: Variety of Housing Opportunity Housm* g Carlsbad Chula Coro�nado Del Mar El Cajo�n Encinitas Type Vista Single-family P P P P P P Multi-family P P P P P P Second P P P P P P Dwelling Units Mobile Home P P P P Parks Manufactured P I? I? P P P Housing Residential Care Facilities P I? I? P P P (_<6 persons) Residential Care Facilities C C, C, C C C (>_6 persons) Emergency P5 I? I? P P P Shelters Transitional P P, P, P 1) P Housing Supportive P P, P, P 1) 1) Housing SRO C3 P, C, Farmworker/ P/(,( Employee C 1) 1) I lousing Notes:P—permitted by right;C—Conditionally,permitted. Potential impediments. 1. Permitted but with a potential impediment. 2. Second units are allowed by-right within the City's R-3000,R-2000,and R-1500 residential,zones.However,they are prohibited in the R1-6,000 and R1-3,800 zones. 3. Referred to as"managed living units," 4. Referred to as"transient lodging," 5. Emergency shelters with no more than 30 beds or persons is allowed by right in the M and P-M zones and are conditionally allowed with more than 30 beds or persons in the same zones. 6. "Large farmworker housing complexes"are conditionally permitted:otherwise farmworker housing is permitted by right. 7. Similarly permitted as similar uses in the same zone, �5:PUBI 11(,",P 0,1 1,(",1, S 14,5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 376 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 66: Variety of Housing Opportunity Housing Escondido Imperial La Mesa Lemon National Oceanside Type Beach Grove city Single-family P P P P P P Multi-family P Pi P P P P Second P P2 P P P P Dwelling Units Mobile Home C P Parks Manufactured P p p P P P Housing Residential Care Facilities P p p P P P (_<6 persons) Residential Care Facilities C C, C, C C C (>_6 persons) Emergency P p p P P P Shelters Transitional P P, P P P Housing Supportive P P, P P Housing SRO C4 C, C P Pi Farmworker/ Employee Pi, P, P I lousingr Notes:P—permitted by right;C—Conditionally,permitted. Potential impediments. 1. Permitted but with a potential impediment. 2. Second units are allowed by-right within the City's R-3000,R-2000,and R-1 500 residential zones.However,they are prohibited in the R1-6,000 and R1-3,800 zones. 3. Referred to as"managed living units," 4. Referred to as"transient lodging," 5. Emergency shelters with no more than 30 beds or persons is allowed by right in the M and P-M zones and are conditionally allowed with more than 30 beds or persons in the same zones. 6. "Large farmworker housing complexes"are conditionally permitted:otherwise farmworker housing is permitted by right. 7. Similarly permitted as similar uses in the same zone. �5:PUBI 11(,",P 0,1 1,(",1, S 14,6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 377 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 66: Variety of Housing Opportunity Housm* g Poway San Diego, San Diego San Santee Solana Vista ity Marcos B�each Type G County Single-family P P P P P P P Multi-family P P P P P P P Accessory P P P P P P P Dwelling Units Mobile Home P C' P P Parks Manufactured P I? I? P P P P Housing Residential Care Facilities P I? I? P P P P (_<6 persons) Residential Care Facilities Ci C, P/C C C, C C, (>_6 persons) Emergency P I? I? P P P Shelters Transitional Pi Housing P P, PAIdi P P P Supportive Housing P P, PAIdi P P P P SRO C3 P, P/C C C. C P Farmworker/ Employee P PYC Pt C P P I lousin(g- Notes:P—permitted by right;C—Conditionally permitted. Potential impediments. 1. Permitted but with a potential impediment. 2. Second units are allowed by-right within the Cit�T's R-3000,R-2000,and R-1 500 residential zones. However,they are prohibited in the RI-6,000 and R1-3,800 zones. 3. Referred to as"managed living units." 4. Referred to as"transient lodg jng." 5. Emergency shelters with no more than 30 beds or persons is allowed by right in the M and P-M zones and are conditionally allowed with.more than 30 beds or persons in the same zones. 6. "Large farmworker housing complexes"are conditionally permitted:otherwise farmwork,er housing is permitted by right. 7. Similarly permitted as similar uses in the same zone. 1-111 1A,1",71"1 1�1'�R�5:P 1��B 1 11(,",P 0,1 1,(",1, S 14,7 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 378 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� A 4o Manufactured Housing State law requires local governments to permit manufactured or mobile homes meeting federal safety and construction standards on a permanent foundation in all single-family residential zoning districts (Section 65852.3 of the California Government Code). All jurisdictions in San Diego County comply with this requirement. Mobile homes offer an affordable housing option to many low- and moderate- income households.To further preserve the affordability of mobile homes, several cities in San Diego County, including Chula Vista and Santee, have adopted rent control policies and ordinances for mobile homes. 5. Licensed Residential Care Facilities The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Sections 5115 and 5116) of the California Welfare and Institutions Code declares that mentally and hvsically disabled persons are entitled to P , live in normal residential surroundings. The use of property for the care of six or fewer persons with mental disorders or disabilities is required by law. A State-auth oriz ed, certified or authorized family care home, foster home, or group home serving six or fewer persons with disabilities or dependent and neglected children on a 24-hour-a-day basis is considered a residential use to be permitted in all residential zones. No local agency can impose stricter zoning or building and safety standards on these homes (commonly referred to as "group" homes) of six or fewer persons with disabilities than are required of the other permitted residential uses in the zone. All jurisdictions in San Diego County comply with the Lanterman Act and conditionally permit larger residential care facilities serving seven or more residents in residential zones. The Lanterman Act covers only licensed residential care facilities. The California Housing Element law also addresses the provision of transitional and supportive housing, which includes non-licensed housing facilities for persons,with disabilities. This topic is discussed later. 6. Emergency Shelters An emergency shelter is a facility that provides temporary shelter and feeding of indigents, or disaster victims,operated by a public or non-profit agency. State law requires, jurisdictions to identify adequate sites for housing which will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety or nousing types for all income levels, including emergency shelters and transitional housing(Section 65583(c)(1) of the Government Code). Recent changes, in State law (SB 2) require that local jurisdictions make provisions, in the zoning code to permit emergency shelters by right in at least one zoning district where adequate capacity is available to accommodate at least one year-round shelter. Local jurisdictions may,however, establish standards to regulate the development of emergency shelters. At the writing of this report, 18 of the 19 jurisdictions in the county allow emergency shelters by right consistent with State law.The following jurisdictions: Carlsbad (2012), Chula Vista (2018), Coronado (2014), Del Mar (2013), El Cajon (2015), Encinitas (2019)�, Escondido (2013), Imperial Beach (2012), La Mesa (2019),Lemon Grove (2019),National City(2011), Oceanside (2013),San Diego City(2016), San Diego County (2010), San Marcos (2012), Santee (2019), Solana Beach (2014) and Vista (20�12) have amended their zoning ordinances to permit emergency shelters, consistent with the provisions �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 14,8 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 379 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 t''[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� of SB 2. However, as of February 2020, the city of Poway did not have adequate provisions for emergency shelters, in their zoning ordinance. The City of Poway does not allow emergency shelters by right in any zone. The currently adopted Housing Element (2013-2020 cycle) acknowledges the need to update the City's zoning ordinance to allow year-round emergency shelters in compliance with state law, but no amendment to the zoning ordinance had been completed as of February 2020. Furthermore, recent changes to State law require additional changes to the Emergency Shelter provisions: • AB 139 (Emergency and Transitional Housing) —parking for shelter staff only; definition of sufficient capacity • AB 101 (Low Barrier Navigation Center) — housing for homeless or at-risk homeless while waiting to transition to permanent housing jurisdictions must update their Zoning Ordinances to comply with State law. The City of Encinitas updated their zoning ordinance in 2019 to comply with AB 139. 7. Transitional and Supportive Housing State law (AB 2634 and SB 2) requires local jurisdictions to address the provisions for transitional and supportive housing. Under Housing Element law, transitional housing means buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than six months from the beginninLy of the CD assistance (California Government Code Section 65582(h)). Supportive housing means housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population and is linked to an onsite or offsite service that assists the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing,improving his or her health status,and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible,work in the community.Target population means persons with low incomes who have one or more disabilities,including mental illness,HIV/AIDS,substance abuse,or other chronic health condition, or individuals eligible for services provided pursuant to the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act(Division 4.5 [commencing with Section 4500] of the Welfare and Institutions Code) and may include, among other populations, adults, emancipated minors, families with children, elderly persons,young adults, aging out of the foster care system,individuals exiting from institutional settings,veterans, and homeless people (California Government Code Sections 65582(o and (g)). Accordingly,State law establishes transitional and supportive housing as a residential use and therefore local governments cannot treat it differently from other similar types of residential uses (e.g.,requiring a use permit when other residential uses of similar function do not require a use permit). Of the County's 19 jurisdictions, 17 had amended their zoning ordinances to include these provisions for transitional and supportive housing as of February 20�20. The County of San Die o amended the Zoning Ordinance in 2010 to distinguish between Lyroun care 9 C-1 1 facilities for six or fewer people (family care home) and group care facilities for seven or more (group �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 14,9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 38,0 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� care). For facilities serving six or fewer persons, a transitional or supportive housing project that requires state community care licensing would be considered a family care home by the County. For facilities serving seven or more persons,a transitional or supportive housing project that requires state community care licensing would be considered a group care facility, which is permitted in RC, C31, C34) C-351 C37, and C46 zones and with a Major Use Permit in A70, A72, and all other residential zones. The City of La Mesa has historically treated transitional housing for the homeless as "residential care facilities" or"community care facilities" in their zoning ordinance. Supportive housing is not expressly addressed in the Zoning Ordinance. The City recognizes that it must update its ordinance to comply c? with state requirements for transitional and supportive housing, but had not completed amendments to its zoning code as of the writing of this report. The City of Vista amended its zoning code in 2015 to allow supportive housing subject to development standards applicable to residential uses in the same zone. The City permits transitional housing facilities for battered women and children (serving six or fewer clients)in all residential zones. Other transitional housing facilities are permitted only in the City's RM zone. The County of San Diego and City of La Mesa do not fully comply with all of the requirements of SB 2 in their treatment of transitional and supportive housing, and their zoning ordinances will need to be further amended in order to maintain consistency with State law. 8�. Single-Roo�m Occupancy (SRO) AB 2634 also mandates that local jurisdictions address the provision of housing options for extremely low-income households, including Single Room Occupancy units (SRO). SRO units are one room units intended for occupancy by a single individual. It is distinct from a studio or efficiency unit, in that a studio is a one-room unit that must contain a kitchen and bathroom. Although SRO units are not required to have a kitchen or bathroom,many SRO�s have one or the other. As of February 2020, the cities of Del Mar and La Mesa do not have adequate SRO provisions in their zoning ordinances. 9. Farmworker Employee Housing The California Employee Housing Act requires that housing for six or fewer employees be treated as a single-family residential use. The Employee Housing Act also requires that housing for agricultural workers consisting of 36 beds or 12 units be treated as an agricultural use and permitted where agricultural uses are permitted in the same way that other agricultural uses are Permitted in that zone. No conditional use permit, zoning variance, or other discretionary zoning clearance can be required for these employee housing developments that is not required of any other agricultural activity in the same zone. The permitted, occupancy in employee housing in a zone allowing agricultural uses must include agricultural employees who do not work on the property where the employee housing is, located. Compliance with these requirements among participating jurisdictions is summarized in Table 67. Some jurisdictions allow employee housing for six or fewer employees as a singje-family residential �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 150 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 38,1 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� use but have not updated their zoning ordinance to explicitly permit this use in accordance with the California Housing Act. Escondido permits a caretaker's residence for farmworkers deriving the majority of their income from employment on the premises in most residential zones that allow agriculture,but does not specify that farmworker employee housing is allowed in all zones where commercial agricultural use is permitted. The City of La Mesa has no agricultural zones but allows agricultural uses in some single-family residential zones. However, the City considers agricultural uses in these zones accessory the the residential uses and not commercial in nature'.with the agricultural products intended for consumption by the household. As such, provisions for farmworker employee housing in these residential zones that allow accessory agricultural use is not required by State law. The City recognizes that it should amend the Zoning Ordinance to clarify the types of non-commercial agricultural activities allowable in the single-family zones as accessory uses. The City of Solana Beach does not have any agricultural zones, there are no agricultural operations within Solana Beach, and no full-time agricultural workers reside in the City. Because of this, the City argues that other affordable housing options provided by the City can serve the housing needs of farmworkers as well, and there is not a need to specifically provide for farmworker employee housing within the City. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 151 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 38,2 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 67: Farmworker Employee Housing by jurisdiction Commercial Permits Compliance with jurisdiction Agricultural Farmworker Housing in Employee Housing Zoning/Uses Zoning Ordinance Act Carlsbad Yes Yes Yes Chula Vista Yes Yes Yes Coronado No n/a No Del Mar No n/a No El Cajon Yes Yes Yes Encinitas Yes Yes Yes Escondido Yes No No Imperial Beach No n/a Yes La Mesa No n/a No Lemon Grove No n/a No National City No n/a No Oceanside Yes Yes No Poway Yes Yes No San Diego (City) Yes Yes No San Diego (County) Yes Yes No San Marcos Yes Yes No Santee Yes Yes No Solana Beach No n/a No Vista Yes Yes Yes D. Ruiildj*��iagr C odes and (1 11111)(joli'lle wo L1, ancy Stamdi,. ds P W111 1 Building Codes Building codes, such as the California Building Standards Code" and the Uniform Housing Code are necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare. However, local codes that require substantial improvements to a building might not be warranted and deter housing construction and/or neighborhood improvement, The California Building Standards Code is published every three years by order of the California legislature. The Code applies to all jurisdictions in the State of California unless otherwise annotated. Adoption of the triennial compilation of Codes is not only a legal mandate,it also ensures the highest available level of safety for citizens and that all construction and maintenance of structures meets the 44 California Building Standards Code, adopted by the a Building Standards Commission, is actually a set of uniform. building, electrical, mechanical, and other codes adopted by professional associations such as the International, Conference of Building Officials,and amended to include Cali fornia-speci fi c requirements. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 152 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 38,3 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� hi(Yhest standards of quality. Most jurisdictions in the San Diego region have adopted the 20�19 California Building Standards Code,with the exception of National City,which has adopted the 2016 California Building Code. Other codes commonly adopted by reference within the region include the California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California or National Electric Code, Uniform Housing Code, and California Fire Code. Less common are the California Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, the Urban-Wildland Interface Code, and the Uniform Code for Building Conservation. Most jurisdictions have amended portions of these codes to reflect non-arbitrary local conditions including geographical and topographic conditions unique to each locality. Although minor amendments have been incorporated to address local conditions, no additional regulations have been imposed by the city or county that would unnecessarily add to housing costs or otherwise impede fair housing choice. I Occupancy Standards Disputes over occupancy standards are typical tenant/ ��12+1,11 11L]h","," landlord and fair housing issues. Families with children and Most State and federal housing programs large households may face discrimination in the housing use the"2+1"rule as an acceptable market, particularly in the rental housing market, because occupancy standard.The appropriate landlords are reluctant or flatly refuse to rent to such number of persons per housing unit is households. Establishing a strict occupancy standard,either estimated at two persons per bedroom plus by the local jurisdictions or by landlords on the rental an additional person. For example,a two- agreements, may be a violation of fair housing practices. bedroom unit could have five occupants. In general, no state or federal regulations govern occupancy standards. The State De artment of Fair C3 p Employment and Housing (DFEH) uses the "two-plus-one" rule in considering the number of persons per housing unit — two persons per bedroom plus an additional person. Using this rule, a landlord cannot restrict occupancy to fewer than three persons for a one-bedroo�m unit or five persons for a two-bedroom unit, etc. While DFEH also uses other factors, such as the age of the occupants and size of rooms, to consider the appropriate standard, the two-plus-one rule is generally followed. Other guidelines are also used as occupancy standards. The Uniform Housing Code (Section 503.2) requires that a dwelling unit have at least one room which is not less than 120 square feet in area. Other habitable rooms, except kitchens, are required to have a floor area of not less than 70 square feet. The Housing Code further states that where two persons occupy a room used for sleeping purpo�ses,, the required floor area should be increased at a rate of 50 square feet for each occupant in excess of two. There is nothing in the Housing Code that prevents people from sleeping in the living or dining rooms, as long as these rooms have a window or door meeting all the provisions of the California Building Code for emergency egress. The Fire Code allows one person per 150 square feet of "habitable" space. These standards are typically more liberal than the "two-plus-one" rule. For example, three people could sleep in a one-bedroom. apartment where the bedroom is at least 120 square feet; and where the living/dining area is at least 170 square feet, an additional three people could sleep there. Therefore, a 290�-square foot one-bedroom apartment can accommodate up to six persons or a two-bedroom 410-square foot apartment can sleep up to nine persons. A review of occupancy standards for jurisdictions within the San Diego region revealed that none of the jurisdictions overtly limit the number of people who can occupy a housing unit. As previously discussed, court rulings stated a Zoning Ordinance cannot regulate residency by discrimination �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 153 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 38,4 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� between biologically-related and unrelated persons. None of the jurisdictions, in the county have a definition of "family" in their Zoning Ordinance with references to how members of a family are related or the maximum number of members in the household. However, the definition of"family" in the Solana Beach zoning ordinance excludes individuals. Such a definition can be considered an impediment because it may give landlords the opportunity to deny renting single-family or multi- family dwelling units to single persons. E0 Af. rd,,aJ-,),,1.eh 11ousli"I'll In general, many minority and special needs households are disproportionately affected by a lack of adequate and affordable housing in a reaion. While affordability issues are not directly fair housing issues, expanding access to housing choices for these groups cannot ignore the affordability factor. Insofar as rent-restricted or non-restricted low-cost housing is concentrated in certain geographic locations, access to housing by lower-income and minority groups in other areas is limited and can therefore be an indirect impediment to fair housing choice. Furthermore, various permit processing and development impact fees charged by local government results in increased housing costs and can be a barrier to the development of affordable housing. Other policies and programs, such as inclusionary housing and growth management programs, can either facilitate or inhibit the production of affordable housing. These issues are examined in the subsections below. i's Siting of Affordable Housing, The San Diego region has a large inventory of rent-restricted multi-family housing units. The distribution of these units, however, is highly uneven throughout the region, with dense clusters of assisted housing located in central San Diego,, National City, Chula Vista and Escondido (see Figure 13 on page 91). Almost three-quarters (71.4 percent) of the region's rent-restricted multi-family housing stock is concentrated in these four cities.jurisdictions with the highest concentration of rent- restricted multi-family housing units (as measured by the ratio of rent-restricted units to total housing units) include National City (12.1 percent), San Marcos (5.4 percent) and Carlsbad (4.3 percent) (see Table 68).jurisdictions with the lowest concentration of rent restricted multi-family units (as measured by the number of restricted units per 500 housing units,) are Del Mar (0.0), Solana Beach (0.0), Encinitas (2.9), and Lemon Grove (5.4). �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 154 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 38,5 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 68: Rent-Restricted Multi-Family Housing Units by jurisdiction %of 0 Rent Rent Total Housing Housing YO of All Rent Restricted Jurisdiction Restficted Restricted Units (2,019) Stock Rent 0 Units per 500 Units Restricted Units in County Housing Units Urban County Coronado 142 9)740 1.5% 0.4% 7.3 Del Mar 0 21625 O�.0 O/o 0.0�0/0 0.0 Imperial Beach 129 10)074 1.3% 0.30/() 6.4 Lemon Grove 98 91114 1.1% 0.20/() 5.4 Poway 704 16,)917 4.2% 1.80/0 20.8 San Marcos 1.1729 32)126 5.4% 4.4% 26.9 Solana Beach 0 6)569 0.0(V() 0.0% 0-0 Unincorporated Areas 2.1215 1781844 1.2% 5.6% 6.2 Entitlement Cities Carlsbad 2)037 47)080 4.3% 5.2% 21.6 Chula Vista 2)545 85)535 3.0% 6.5% 14.9 .A Cajon 1254 36J48 3.5% 3.2% 17.3 Encinitas 152 26�)495 01.6% 0.4% 2.9 Escondido 1.1559 48)833 3.2% 4.0% 16.0 La Mesa 566 26�)869 2.1(Vo 1.4% 10.5 National City 2.1097 17)264 12.1(Vo 5.3% 60.7 Oceanside 1.1307 65)902 2.0% 3.3% 9.9 San Diego 21,1937 5451)645 4.0% 55.7% 20.1 Santee 578 21J00 2.7% 1.5% 13�.7 Vista 349 321)580 1.1% 0.9% 5.4 Total County 39)398 1)219�)460 3.2% 100.01% 16.2 Source:California Department of Finance,2019;HUD,California Housing Partnership,and participating jurisdictions. �5:PUBI 11 P0 ,1 1,(",1, S 155 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 38,6 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'� I Develoi-%ment Fees Y Housing construction imposes certain short- and long-term costs upon local government, such as the cost of providing planning services and inspections. As a result, San Diego County jurisdictions rely upon various planning and development fees to recoup costs and ensure that essential services and infrastructure are available when needed. Planning fees for the County of San Diego and its jurisdictions are summarized in Table 69. As shown, fees vary widely based on the needs of each jurisdiction. Table 69: Planning Fees by jurisdiction ion General Plan CUP Var' Tract Map Parcel Zone Jurisdict' Amendment lance Map Change Carlsbad $4)677-$6�747 $4�913 $3�098 $8J93 $3�678 $V73- $7)279 Chula Vista $20001 $11 10001 $9001 $1010001 $2�5001 $10)0001 Coronado $510001 $31533 $31846 $11703 $5�0()o I Del Mar $1 O)OO�01 $81513 $51370 $61250 $51240 $1()M)o I El Cajon $3)505 $51195 $11025 $6�225 + $3�625 + $4)125 $74/lot $26/lot Encinitas $13)00�01 $61000 $31810 $131000 + $41555 $20M001 650/lot Escondido $5J85-$900 $3�050 $2�O�30 $41107- $2�635 $-'5)9()0- $6.905 $5)100 Imperial Beach $5,000 $200 $1 NO $2�500 $2�000 $3)000 La Mesa $15,179 $21095- $2)097- $7�557 $5�859 $13)730 $41150 $41127 Lemon Grove $3,000 $11)500 $750 $45500 $25700 $15000 National City $5)500 $31700 $3)700 $4)000 $3)000 $5)500 Oceanside $10,000- $5)0()Ol $410001 $8001 $300 1 $�35000_ $15001 $15001 Poway $1)917 $31299 $799 $4)174 $2)711 $1)917 San Diego City $12001 $8)0()Ol $810001 $1010001 $1010001 $12001 San Diego County $16X71 $10)2241 $319451 $1910991 $1117111 $10 8721 San Marcos $2)500 $31476 $564 $25690 + $2)090 $872 $50/lot $13001 $151)000- $215001 $1610001 $6 0001 $130001 Santee $20,0001 Solana Beach $10,001 $816�60 $6)555 $14)()00 $1())725 $10001 Vista $9782 $71430 $3)119 $65719- $4)368 $9)621 1 1 $91253 Source:Participating jurisdictions,2020. Notes: 1. Indicates initial deposit amount.Actual fee is full cost recovery. 1-111 1A,1 1 1�1'�R�5:P 1� 13 1 11(,",P 0,1 1,(",1, S 156 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 38,7 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� 3. Develoi-%ment Impact Fees Y jurisdictions also charge a variety of impact fees to offset the cost of providing the infrastructure and public facilities required to serve new development. Until 1978, property taxes were the primary revenue source for financing the construction of infrastructure and improvements required to support new residential development. The passage of Proposition 13 in 1978 has limited a local jurisdiction's ability to raise property taxes and significantly lowered the ad valorem tax rate, increasing reliance on other funding sources to provide infrastructure, public improvements, and public services. An alternative funding source widely used among local governments in California is the development impact fee,which is collected for a variety of improvements including water and sewer facilities,parks, and transportation improvements. To enact an impact fee, State law requires that the local jurisdiction demonstrate the"nexus"between th e type of development in question and the impact being mitigated by the proposed fee. Also, the amount of the fee must be roughly proportional to the impact caused by the development. Nevertheless, development impact fees today have become a significant cost factor in housing develo ment. jurisdictions in San Diego County have imposed a variety of impact fees for new P development (Table 70). Table 70: Development Impact Fees by jurisdl*ctl*on Parks Transportatlon/ Public Facilities/ Public Art Traffic Sewer Carlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar El CaJ on Encinitas Escondido Imperial Beach 0 0 La Mesa 0 0 0 Lemon Grove 0 0 0 National City 0 0 Oceanside 0 0 0 Poway 0 0 0 San Diego City 0 0 0 0 San Diego County 0 0 0 San Marcos 0 0 0 Santee 0 0 0 Solana Beach 0 0 0 0 Vista 0 0 0 Source:Participating Jurisdiction,s,2015. 1-111 1A,1",71"1 R�5:P 1� 13 1 11 P0 ,1 1, 1, S 157 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 38,8 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� The contribution of fees to home prices varies temporally as well as spatially. When times are good, housing production tends to lag behind demand, especially in coastal markets. Housing prices during such periods are chiefly affected by the balance between supply and demand and are much less affected by construction and development costs. When economic times are bad and demand is weak, housing prices are more sharply affected by the prices of construction inputs,, including fees. The strength of the economy and housing market also determines the degree of fee shifting and who ultimately pays fees. During strong economic times, it is the final homebuyer or renter who ends up paying housing development fees; the builder or developer is mostly an intermediary. During recessionary periods, the burden of paying fees may be shifted backwards to the landowner. Irli 4. Linkager I ees A linkage fee is a development impact fee applied to non-residential development. This fee can be used by local governments to support affordable housing construction and it is applied in recognition of the housing needs of lower-income workers who often are employed by end users of new development. Linkage fees can facilitate de-concentration of affordable housing development and reduce the negative social and environmental effects of jobs-housing imbalances in a region if the use of this funding is combined with a policy that requires the scattering of affordable units throughout a community and/or require concurrent construction of market-rate and affordable units in new development. Currently, the City of San Diego is the only jurisdiction that charges a linkage fee to non-residential development to offset the cumulative effects of non-residential development on affordable housing and transportation. The underlying purpose of the City of San Diego's linkage fee is to ensure that new office, retail, research and development,, manufacturing, warehouse, and hotel development pay a fair share of the subsidies necessary to house the low-income employees related to such development. The fees are placed in the San Diego Housing Trust Fund and can be utilized to assist the construction of affordable housing units located anywhere within the boundaries of the City of San Diego. The Municipal Code establishes a mechanism to ensure a geographic nexus between the location of new jobs and the expenditure of revenue for housing projects.45, nd I se P()1h11111ies Pro ,-I rat ns Fe ilihh.er Ltl 9 a- d Controls Land use policies,programs, and controls can impede or facilitate housing development and can have implications for fair housing choice in a community.Inclusionary housing policies and redevelopment pro�ject areas, can facilitate new affordable housing projects,while growth management programs can impede new affordable housing development.jurisdictions that have not sought Article 34 authority may also be prevented from directly engaging in affordable housing development. Table 71 identifies jurisdictions that are affected by or have adopted land use policies, programs, and controls that may have a negative impact on housing development and fair housing choice. 45 Flor more information,see Chapter 9,Article 8,Division 6 of the San Diego Municipal Code. �5:PUBI 11(,",P 0,1 1,(",1, S 158 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 38,9 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Table 71: Land Use Policies and Controls by jurisdiction jurisdictions Article 34 Gro�wth Inclusionary Management Ho�using Carlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas Escondido Imperial Beach La Mesa 0 Lemon Grove National City Oceanside 0 Poway San Diego City, 0 San Diego CounqT C? San Marcos Santee Solana Beach Vista 1, Article 34 Article 34 of the State Constitution requires a majority vote of the electorate to approve the development, construction, or acquisition by a public body of any "low rent housing project" within that jurisdiction. In other words, for any projects to be built and/or operated by a public agency where at least 50 percent of the occupants are low-income and rents are restricted to affordable levels, the jurisdiction must seek voter approval known as "Article 34 authority" to authorize that number of units.Several jurisdictions within the San Diego region have obtained Article 34 authority to be directly involved in the development, construction, or acquisition of low-rent housing. Carlsbad voters approved an Article 34 measure to allow no more than 200 units of senior low income housing in November 1980; this authority has only been exercised -twice since voter approval. The City of Chula Vista currently has 24 remaining Article 34 units allotted and on November 7, 2006 voters approved authority for an additional 1,600 units of which there is a current balance of 858. No projects requiring Article 34 authority have been proposed in Del Mar, therefore, residents have not been asked to vote on a referendum to allow the City to develop, construct, or acquire affordable housing. The City of El Cajon has voter approval for senior projects only and complies with Article 34 for all other housing types. In 1978,La Mesa residents voted to provide the City with authority to develop, acquire, or construct 200 senior units under Article 34. To date, the City has used 128 units of its Article 34 authority for the development of La Mesa Springs and has a remaining capacity of 72 units. Voters in the City of San Diego approved Measure M in 2016 to allow the City to develop, �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 159 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 390 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P[��,"Dl N4 E F"[`S'� construct, or acquire up to 49,180 affordable units, an increase in 38,680 units over the previous number of allowable units. The voters of the City of Vista approved Proposition W in 1980, authorizing the development of up to 95 low-income, rental housing units per year without going to a public vote. In the past, Article 34 may have prevented certain projects from being built because seeking voter approval for such activities was controversial and difficult. In practice, most public agencies have learned how to structure projects to avoid triggering Article 34, such as limiting public assistance to 49 percent of the units in the project. Furthermore, the State legislature has enacted Sections, 37001, 37001.3, and 37001.5 of the Health and Safety Code to clarify ambiguities relating to the scope of the applicability of Article 3�4. In 2018, two State Senators introduced legislation to repeal Article 34 as Senate Constitutional Amendment 1 (SCA 1). The California Senate passed SCA 1 in September 2019 by unanimous vote. If passed by the California Assembly, the amendment can be placed on the ballot for potential approval by California voters. I Growth Management Programs Growth management programs facilitate well-planned development and ensure that the necessary services and facilities for residents are provided. However,a growth management program may act as a constraint if it prevents a jurisdiction from addressing its housing needs, which could indirectly impede fair housing choice. These programs range from general policies that require the expansion of public facilities and services concurrent with new development,to policies that establish urban growth boundaries (the outermost extent of anticipated urban development), to numerical limitations on the number of dwelling units that may be permitted annually. Of the county's 19 jurisdictions, eight have adopted Growth Management Programs. While the programs are intended to manage growth, the programs are highly variable in detail. The City of Carlsbad has a growth management program that establishes a maximum amount of dwelling units for each quadrant of the City, and also includes performance standards that require services and infrastructure to be provided to meet the demands of new development. However, the City of Carlsbad is also recognized as having one of the State's most effective inclusionary housing policies with a proven affordable housing production track record. Chula Vista's Growth Management Program establishes thresholds for eleven areas including traffic, police, fire and emergency services, schools,libraries, parks and recreation,water, sewer, drainage, air quality, and economics. Encinitas requires voter approval to increase residential density or modify land use from non- residential zoning. However, in 2018 a California judge temporarily suspended this requirement to allow the City to adopt land use changes included in the City's 2013-2021 Housing Element. Escondido requires voter approval for all proposals to increase residential density or non-residential intensity (such as through general plan amendments). However, the City does not require voter approval for increase in density in cases where affordable housing is involved to ensure compliance with housing law. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 160 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 391 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� In 1979, the City of San Diego implemented a Tier System to manage growth. Under this system., the Urban Core would develop first, then the outlying urban area, and finally the Future Urbanizing Area which is now being developed. Growth is managed in the unincorporated areas of San Diego County through the Multiple Species Conservation Plan (MSCP) and establishment of residential buildout ceilings and large minimum lot sizes (40 acres in some cases)within several community planning areas. Residential growth management requirements in San Marcos require new development in the city to ensure funding and timely construction of all threshold public facilities or services,, as required by location. Solana Beach voters passed Proposition T in 2000, which requires voter approval to change, alter, or increase General Plan residential land use categories. Because the City can meet its RHNA requirements under existing land use designations, it does not consider the growth management plan an impediment to affordable housing. The cities of Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, Santee, and Vista have not adopted growth management programs. State housing law mandates a Jurisdiction facilitate the development of a variety of housing to meet the jurisdiction's fair share of regional housing needs. Any growth management measure that would compromise a jurisdiction's ability to meet its regional housing needs may have an exclusionary effect of limiting housing choices and opportunities of regional residents or concentrating such opportunities in other areas of the region. 3. Inclusionary Housing Programs Inclusionary housing describes a local government's requirement specifying a percentage of new housing units be reserved for, and affordable to, lower- and moderate-income households. The goal of inclusionary housing programs, is to increase the supply of affordable housing commensurate with new market-rate development in a )urisdiction. This can result in an improved regional Jobs-housing balances and foster greater economic and racial integration within a community. The policy is most effective in areas experiencing rapid growth and a strong demand for housing. Inclusionary programs can be voluntary or mandatory. Voluntary programs typically require developers to negotiate with public officials but do not specifically mandate the provision of affordable units. Mandatory programs are usually codified in the zoning ordinance and developers are required to enter into a development agreement specifying the required number of affordable housing units or payment of applicable in-lieu fee"prior to obtaining a building permit. In San Diego County, 10 jurisdictions had adopted inclusio�nary housing programs as, of February 2020. All programs in the county can be described as mandatory because they require dedication of a fixed percentage of proposed units affordable to lower or moderate income households or payment of an in-lieu fee used to build new affordable housing units in the Jurisdiction. Inclusionary housing programs in the county vary considerably by jurisdiction. 46 An in-lieu fee is the payment of a specified sum of money instead of constructing the required number of affordable housing units.The fee is used to finance affordable housing elsewhere in a community. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 161 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 392 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� The City of Carlsbad requires 15 percent of all base residential units within any Master Plan/Specific Plan community or other qualified subdivision (currently seven units or more) to be restricted and affordable to lower-income households. Chula Vista requires the provision of 10 percent (five percent low-income and five percent moderate- income) affordable housing within projects of 50 or more dwelling units. The City of Coronado's inclusionary housing program requires that parcel or subdivision maps involving two or more lots or two or more dwelling units provide 20 percent of the total units in the development for rent to lower-income households. Under this program no inclusionary units have been constructed by market-rate developers as of the writing of this report; however, in-lieu fees collected from these developers have contributed to the expansion of affordable housing in the City through the Community Development Agency programs. The City of Del Mar Assistance Program requires that certain housing developments pay an in-lieu fee or set aside some of units for affordable housing. In-lieu fees are placed in a Housing Assistance Reserve and used to provide rental subsidies to low-income households. The City of Encinitas requires residential development to provide 15 percent of units for low-income households or 10 percent for very low-income households unless exempted or an alternative for providing affordable units is approved. The City of El Cajon's affordable housing requirement was based on its redevelopment housing requirement. However, with the dissolution of redevelopment in California, this requirement is no longer applicable. The City's Housing Element includes an action to evaluate the need for a citywide inclusionary housing ordinance, but the City had not adopted an updated ordinance as of February 2020. National City's affordable housing requirement was also part of its redevelopment program, which was eliminated in 2011 by changes to state law. Remaining redevelopment funds earmarked for affordable housing are used to increase, maintain, and preserve affordable housing for low- and moderate-income households. The City of Oceanside requires new residential development to include 1015 percent affordable units or play an in-lieu fee. The City of Poway requires new residential development to make 15 percent of units affordable to low-income households, 20 percent affordable to moderate-income households, or pay an in-lieu fee.The City of San Diego requires all residential development of two or more units to pay an Inclusionary Affordable Housing Fee or provide affordable units on site, unless exempt. In October 2018 the County Board of Supervisors directed staff to prepare an economic analysis and criteria for a Potential General Plan Amendment to create an affordable housing program and/or an inclusionary housing ordinance. To date the Board has not taken further action on these potential amendments. San Marcos requires residential development to provide 15 percent of units as affordable or pay an in-lieu fee, depending on the size of the development. The City of Solana Beach requires residential development of five or more units to set aside 15 percent as affordable units. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 162 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 393 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1�A`S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� The City of Vista eliminated their inclusionary housing requirements in 2015. P(,�Aic.�i� 'D"sptacejrnet��Itt m ,,Afl�ct 1����Ioi-Lisi_n Go i,es Ca i i.sn''19 1 9 4 a"In. a 1 ies rit"I e s ,,d 'Persons with D*sabl"I'd Local government policies could result in displacement or affect representation of minorities or the disabled. 1, Reasonable Accommodation Under State and Federal laws,local governments are required to "reasonably accommodate" housing for persons with disabilities when exercising planning and zoning powers. jurisdictions must grant variances and zoning changes if necessary to make new construction or rehabilitation of housing for persons with disabilities feasible, but are not required to fundamentally alter their zoning ordinance. Although most local governments are aware of State and federal requirements to allow reasonable accommodations,if specific policies or procedures are not adopted by a jurisdiction,disabled residents may be unintentionally displaced or discriminated against. Lemon Grove is the only jurisdiction in the region that had not adopted a formal reasonable accommodation procedure as of February 2020. Currently,most of the cities with adopted reasonable accommodations procedures (with the exception of Escondido, La Mesa, National City, Oceanside, and Santee) have a definitio�n of disabled person in their Zoning Ordinance. A jurisdiction's definition of a disabled person can be considered an impediment to fair housing if it is not consistent with the definition of disability provided under the Fair Housing Act. The Act defines disabled person as "those individuals with mental or physical impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activities." All of the definitions used by San Diego jurisdictions are consistent with the Fair Housing Act and are not considered an impediment. A ��,toritj,es Locto"11 `f�1' 0`11S,"im u"ti, In the San Diego region,the HUD Housing Choice Voucher program is administered by six different local housing authorities,two of which also oversee a public housing program.The following housing authorities only administer housing choice vouchers: Carlsbad, Encinitas, Oceanside, and National City. The housing authorities for the City and County of San Diego also own and manage public housing in addition to administering the Housing Choice Voucher program. The availability and use of Housing Choice Vouchers and public housing units must also adhere to fair housing laws. Most local housing authorities in the county have adopted priorities or preferences for Housing Choice Vouchers and/or public housing. Typically, families with children, elderly families, disabled families, and veterans are gj*ven preferences. Section 16(a)(3)(B) of the United States Housing Act (Housing Act) mandates that public housing authorities adopt an admissions policy that promotes the deconcentration of poverty in public housing. HUD, emphasizes that the goal of deconcentration is to foster the development of mixed- �5:PUBI B",P0 ,1 1,("J,1"'S 163 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 394 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'� income communities within public housing. In mixed-income settings, lower income residents are provided with greater access to employment and information networks. For Housing Choice Vouchers, the Housing Act mandates that not less than 75 percent of new admissions must have incomes at or below 30 percent of the Area Median Income. The remaining balance of 25 percent may have incomes up to 50 percent of the Area Median Income. For public housing, the Housing Act mandates that not less than 40 percent of new admissions must have incomes at or below 30 percent of the Area Median Income. The balance of 60 percent of new admissions may have incomes up to 50 percent of the Area Median Income. In ient al u,afit'�JT ,A.ct (CE()..,,,,A) CEQA is California's broadest environmental law as it applies to all discretionary projects proposed to be conducted or approved by a public agency, including private pro�jects that require government approval. The primary purpose of CEQA is to disclo�se to the public the significant environmental effects of a proposed pro�ject. CEQA also requires that public agencies disclose to the public the decision making process utilized to approve projects and is intended to enhance public participation in the environmental review process. In October 2011, the Governor signed into law SB 226, which allows for streamlined CEQA review for certain infill.development projects,including some Transit Oriented Developments (TO,Ds). The statute allows an exemption or limited environmental review of projects that meet certain criteria and are consistent with earlier policy documents such as General Plans, Specific Plans, or Master Plans. Subsequent environmental review of qualifying pro�jects is limited to new or substantially greater impacts not adequately addressed in an earlier CEQA document. The streamlined environmental process allowed by SB 226 makes it possible for the environmental impacts of documents like a General Plan, Specific Plan, or Master Plan area to be analyzed long before a physical development project is proposed. Because SB, 226 does not include a time limit, CEQA's environmental review and public comment requirements could be satisfied by a document prepared years prior to the proposal of a specific development proposal. Because infill and TOD projects are often proposed in under-served, lower-income and minority neighborhoods, the disjointed disclosure of potential environmental impacts resulting from SB, 226 has potential for disproportionate adverse impacts on protected classes. 1111,0�',"I t U, C 0 I'll tly :R,epresen It''t 1,1 )n and, Part,,,, .01pa tioll, iiiiiiiiiiiii��illillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillilI Adequate community involvement and representation is important to overcoming and identifying impediments to fair housing. Decisions regarding housing development in a community are typically made by the City Council or Board of Supervisors and applicable Planning Commissions.The Council or Board members are elected officials and answer to the constituents. Planning Commissioners are residents appointed by the Council or Board and often serve an advisory role. In addition to the City Council, Board of Supervisors, and Planning Commission, most jurisdictions have appointed commissions, committees, and task forces to address specific issues. Commissions dealing directly with housing issues are most common in the region's 19, jurisdictions; however, only �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 164 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 395 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� National City and the City of San Diego have commissions that specifically address special housing needs and only the City and County of San Diego have commissions specifically addressing the housing needs of persons with disabilities or families with children. These issues are often addressed in the remaining jurisdictions as part of a standing commission. Community participation can be limited or enhanced by actions or inaction by a public agency. According to the results of the Fair Housing Survey, ten San Diego residents reported being discriminated against by a government staff person. A broader range of residents may feel more comfortable approaching an agency with concerns, or suggestions if that agency offers sensitivity or diversity training to its staff members that typically interface with the public. In addition,if there is a mismatch between the linguistic capabilities of staff members and the native languages of local residents, non-English speaking residents may be unintentionally excluded from the decision making process.Another factor that may affect community participation is the inadequacy of an agency or public facility to accommodate residents with various disabilities. Most jurisdictions in San Diego County have bi-lingual capabilities to serve Spanish-speaking residents, and many have multi-Iingual capabilities. For example, the City of El Cajon offers services in Arabic. The HUD Programs Administration Office at the City of San Diego accommodates Spanish, Arabic and Tagalog speakers, and San Diego (City) has other multilingual capabilities upon request. The cities of Escondido, Oceanside and Vista, as well as the County of San D�iego�, have contracts with various language lines and are able to accommodate all languages. And the City of San Marcos has multi-lingual capabilities in Vietnamese, Farsi, Mandarin, Russian, Ukrainian, Arabic, Armenian, Afrikaans and Sign Language, in addition to Spanish. In addition, the city halls of all participating jurisdictions and the County -Administration Buildings are accessible to persons with disabilities. The City of San Diego and the County of San Diego also have Community Planning Groups (CPGs) made up of local stakeholders,that advise decision makers on land use issues.Planning group members are elected to their positions and their input to decision makers is nonbinding. The 2017/2018 San Diego County Grand jury received a complaint that City of San Diego CPGs delay hearing agenda items as a way to de facto restrict growth in the communities they represent. The Grand jury found that membership of many CPGs in the City may not appropriately reflect diversity with community and that the City had not taken sufficient action to address fair community representation on CPGs. The Grand jury recommended a number of actions to address these issues, including developing methods and providing resources to improve recruiting to CPGs that could result in more diverse membership, and considering more close monitoring of CPG meetings by City staff to preclude requests for inappropriate project additions or modifications that could delay developments. Most jurisdictions in the county do not offer periodic sensitivity or diversity training for staff personnel. However, some Jurisdictions do send their employees to periodic trainings. For example, both the City of Carlsbad and the City of Escondido send their employees to Respectful Workplace Training every two years.The City of Oceanside requires its Housing Staff to attend periodic trainings, regarding Fair Housing Discrimination (Sect*on 504 — Reasonable Accommodation training 1 1 1 _); these trainings, are organized by North County Lifeline. The City of San Diego covers harassment and discrimination topics in its mandatory New Employee Orientation. In addition, a number of training �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 165 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 396 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P[��,'JH N4 E F"[`S'� opportunities (including EEO issues,sexual harassment prevention,reasonable accommodations,and customer service) are available to its supervisory employees. The County of San Diego provides at periodic training for its employees covering inclusion, diversity, age discrimination, cultural competency, unconscious bias. Furthermore, the City of Santee conducts mandatory training on a bi- annual basis. Topics covered in the mandatory training include: the types of behaviors that would constitute discrimination, harassment and/or retaliation as defined by the City of Santee; definitions of the types of behaviors that create a hostile, offensive and/or intimidating work. environment; and what to do if an employee believes such behaviors have occurred in the workplace. �5:PUBI 11(,",P0 ,1 1,("J,1,,'S 166 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 397 of 768 �"Ip'OF AIR 1�10 t,�,,]""SI IN"'G "PROFIL...........I Ed AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS,To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 0 "Ihis, chapter provides, an overview of the institutional structure of the housing industry with regard to fair housing practices. In addition, this chapter discusses the fair housing services available to residents in San Diego County, as well as the nature and extent of fair housing complaints received by the fair housing providers. Typically, fair housing services encompass the investigation and resolution of housing discrimination complaints, discrimination auditing/testing, and education and outreach, including the dissemination of fair housing information. Tenant/landlord counseling services are usually offered by fair housing service providers, but are not considered fair housing services. e t isiln gr iln t1i,e H ,A. Hot on ieown,ership ''Mad, Part of the American dream involves owning a home in the neighborhood of one's choice. Not all Americans, however, have always enjoyed equal access to homeownership due to credit market distortions, "redlining," steering, and predatory lending practices. This sub-section analyzes potential impediments to fair housing in the home ownership sector. L The Homeownership Process The following discussions describe the process of homebuying and likely situatio�ns when a person/household may encounter housing discrimination. However, much of this process occurs in the private housing market, over which local jurisdictions have little control or authority to regulate. The recourse lies in the ability of the contracted fair housing service providers in monitoring these activities,identifying the perpetrators, and taking appropriate reconciliation or legal actions. A The first thing a potential buyer is likely to do when they consider buying a home is search advertisements, either in magazines, newspapers,, or the Internet to get a feel for what the market offers. Advertisements cannot include discriminatory references, such as the use of words describing: • Current or potential residents; • Neighbors or the neighborhood in racial or ethnic terms; • Adults preferred; • Perfect for empty-nesters; • Conveniently located by a Catholic Church; or • Ideal for married couples without kids. In a survey of online listings for homes available for purchase in San Diego County in March 2020,, a limited number of advertisements included potentially discriminatory language. Of the total 526 listings surveyed, 103 listings included references to something other than the physical descripti.on of the home or included amenities and services (Table 72)�. All of the potentially discriminatory r"'i()�,,l P I V,J 167 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 398 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P[��,"Dl N4 E F"[`S'� advertisements, were targeted specifically at families through the identification of quality school districts, nearby schools, and available family amenities. Table 72: Potential Discrimination in Listings of For-�Sale Homes Discrimmation Type Number of Po�tentiall'y Discriminatory Language Listings No Discriminatory 423 Language The rig 'jit home for a new couple looking to grow Household Size/Family Home is located in a safe neighborhood with a lot of kids Related 103 Easiest walk.to local high-rated schools N Perfect backyard ready for the family and entertaining! 0 This home is riLt next to the ocean,Lerfect for an active family Note:Examples are direct quotes from the listings(including punctuation and emphasis). Source:realtor.com,accessed March 2020. Len Initially,buyers must find a lender that will qualify them for a loan. This part of the process entails an application, credit check, ability to repay, amount eligible for,choosing the type and terms of the loan, etc. Applicants are requested to provide a lot of sensitive information including their gender,ethnicity, income level,age,and familial status. Most of this information is used for reporting purposes required of lenders by the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). Chapter 4 of this Al provides a detailed analysis of HMDA data for the San Diego region. Rea]Es ta te Agen1o,01-- Real estate agents may act as agents of discrimination. Some unintentionally,or possibly intentionally, may steer a potential buyer to particular neighborhoods by encouraging the buyer to look into certain areas;others may choose not to show the buyer all choices, available. Agents may also discriminate by who they agree to represent,who they turn away, and the comments they make about their clients. The California Association of REALTORS9 (CAR) has included language on many standard forms disclosing fair housing laws to those involved. Many REALTOR9 Associations also host fair housing trainings/seminars to educate members on the provisions and liabilities of fair housing laws, and the Equal Opportunity Housing Symbol is also printed on all CAR forms as a reminder. 0 Covenan Restrictions &RS ..6cc ___') Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), are restrictive promises that involve voluntary agreements, running with the land with which they are associated and are listed in a recorded Declaration of Restrictions. The Statute of Frauds (Civil Code Section 1624), requires them to be in writing, because they involve real property. They must also be recorded in the County where the property is located in order to bind future owners,. Owners of parcels may agree amongst themselves as to the restrictions on use, but in order to be enforceable they must be reasonable. The California Department of Real Estate reviews CC&Rs for all subdivisions of five or more lots, or condominiums of five or more units. This review is authorized by the Subdivided Lands Act and mandated by the Business Professions Code, Section 11000. The review includes a wide range of 6: 11':'1 168 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 399 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� issues, including compliance with fair housing law. The review must be completed and approved before the Department of Real Estate will issue a final subdivision public report. This, report is required before a real estate broker or anyone can sell the units, and each prospective buyer must be issued a copy of the report. If the CC&Rs are not approved,the Department of Real Estate will issue a "deficiency notice", requiring the CC&Rs be revised. CC&Rs are void if they are unlawful, impossible to perform or are in restraint on alienation (a clause that prohibits someone from selling or transferring his/her property). However, older subdivisions and condominium/townhome developments may contain illegal clauses that are enforced by the homeowners associations. As California laws regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) have substantially changed in recent years,many jurisdictions are encountering issues with homeowners associations that have CC&Rs that require HOA approval for such construction. Homeowners Insurance IndusLiy Without insurance, banks and other financial institutions lend less. For example, if a company excludes older homes from coverage, lower income and minority households who may only be able to afford to buy in older neighborhoods may be disproportionately affected. Another example includes Private mortgage insurance (PM1). PMI obtained by applicants from Community Reinvestment Act(CRA) protected neighborhoods is known to reduce lender risk. Redlining of lower income and minority neighborhoods can occur if otherwise qualified applicants are denied or encouraged to obtain pMI.41 I National Association of REALTORSO (NAR') The National Association of REALTORS9, (NAR) has developed a Fair Housing Program to provide resources and guidance to REALTORS9 in ensuring equal professional services for all people. The term REALTOR8 identifies a licensed professional in real estate who is a member of the NAR; however,, not all licensed real estate brokers and salespersons are members of the NAR. Code ofEthics Article 10 of the NAR Code of Ethics provides that"REALTORS9 shall not deny equal professional services to any person for reasons of race,color,religion,sex,handicap, familial status,national origin, sexual orientation,, or gender identit-y. REALTORS*) shall not be Parties to anyt,.)lan or agreement to discriminate against a person or persons on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity." Additionally, Standard of Practice Article 10-1 states that, "'When involved in the sale or lease of a residence, REALTO�RS9 shall not volunteer information regarding the racial, religious or ethnic composition of any neighborhood nor shall they engage in any activity which may result in panic selling,however, REALTORS9 may provide other demographic information." Standard, of Practice 10-3 adds that"REALTORS*)shall not print,display or circulate any statement or advertisement with respect to selling or renting of a property that indicates any preference, limitations or discrimination 47 "Borrower and Neighborhood Racial Characteristics and Financial Institution 14'inancial Application Screening"; Mester,Loretta J;journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics;9 241-243; 1994 0", 6: 1' 11,:,1 169 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 400 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity." DiversitIf Certification NAR has created a diversity certification, "At Home with Diversity: One America" to be granted to licensed real estate professionals who meet eligibility requirements and complete the NAR"At Home with Diversity" course. The certification will signal to customers that the real estate professional has been trained on working with diversity in today's real estate markets. The coursework provides valuable business planning tools to as,sist real estate profes,sionals, in reaching out and marketing to a diverse housing market. The NAR course focuses on diversity awareness,building cross-cultural skills, and developing a business diversity plan. 3. California Department of Real Estate (DRE) The California Department of Real Estate (DRE) is the licensing authority for real estate brokers and salespersons. As noted earlier, not all licensed brokers and salespersons are members of the National or California Association of REALTORsk. The DRE has adopted education requirements that include courses in ethics and in fair housing. To renew a real estate license, each licensee is required to complete 45 hours of continuing education, including three hours in each of the four mandated areas: A'gency, Ethics, Trust Fund, and Fair Housing. The fair housing course contains information that will enable an agent to identify and avoid discriminatory practices when providing real estate services to clients. The law requires,as part of the 45 hours of continuing education,completion of five mandatory three- hour courses,in Agency,Ethics,Trust Fund Handling and Fair Housing and Risk Management. These licensees will also be required to complete a minimum of 18 additional hours of courses related to consumer protection. The remaining hours required to fulfill the 45 hours of continuing education may be related to either consumer service or consumer protection, at the option of the licensee. 4. California Association of REAILTORS@ (CAR) The California Association of Realtors (CAR) is a trade association of realtors statewide. As members of organized real estate, realtors also subscribe to a strict code of ethics as noted above. CAR has recently created the position of Equal Opportunity/Cultural Diversity Coordinator. CAR holds three meetings per year for its general membership, and the meetings typically include sessions on fair housing issues. Current outreach efforts in the Southern California area are directed to underserved communities and state-licensed brokers and sales persons who are not members of the CAR. 6: 11,:, 170 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 401 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� REAL TORO Associa tions &n�&ng San ine eo Co un t REALTOR9 Associations are generally the first line of contact for real estate agents who need continuing education courses,legal forms, career development, and other daily work necessities. The frequency and availability of courses varies amongst these associations, and local association membership is, generally determined by the location of the broker for which an agent works. Complaints involving agents or brokers may be filed with these associations. Monitoring of services by these associations is difficult as detailed statistics of the education/services the agencies provide or statistical information pertaining to the members is rarely available. The following associations serve San Diego County: • Greater San Diego Association of REALTORS (SDAR) • North County Association of REALTORS (NSDCAR) • Pacific Southwest Association of REALTORS (PSAR) ��l C1 1� air "111 ''Ren ut,,1S,111 :1r I ie F- I the . ............. tal I (: \4a,,rket i's Rental Process A Like with ad listings for for-sale homes, rental advertisements cannot include discriminatory references. A total of 524 rental listings were surveyed in March 2020 and 123 advertisements were found to contain potentially discriminatory language (Table 73). The problematic language typically involved references to household size, familial status, schools or children (49, ads) and pets (74 ads). Under California's fair housing law, source of income is a protected class. It is, therefore, considered unlawful to prefer, limit, or discriminate against a specific income source for a potential ho�mebuyer. Until 2020,source of income protection did not include Section 8 assistance. In 2019,the State passed S�B 329 (effective January 1, 20,20), making Section 8 and other public assistance as legitimate source of income for rents. Rental advertisements with references to pets in San Diego County were a significant issue in the listings surveyed. Persons with disabilities are one of the protected classes under fair housing law,and apartments must allow"service animals"and"companion animals,"under certain conditions. Service animals are animals that are individually trained to perform tasks for people with disabilities such as guiding people who are blind,alerting people who are deaf,pulling wheelchairs,alerting and protecting a person who is having a seizure, or performing other special tasks. Service animals are working animals, not pets. Companion animals, also referred to as assistive or therapeutic animals, can assist individuals with disabilities in their daily living and as with service animals, help disabled persons overcome the limitations of their disabilities and the barriers in their environment. Persons with disabilities have the right to ask their housing provider to make a reasonable accommodation in a "no pets" policy in order to allow for the use of a companion or service animal. However,in the case of rental ads that specifically state "no pets," some disabled persons may not be aware of their right to ask for an exception to this rule. Because of this, a person with a disability may 6: 11,:,1 171 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 402 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� see themselves as limited in their housing options and a "no pets" policy could, therefore, be interpreted as potentially discriminatory. Of the rental listings surveyed, 74 ads included language to specifically ban pets. Table 71 Potential Discrimination in Listings of Homes for Rent Discrimination Type Number of Potentially Discriminatory Language No Discriminatory Listings I,anguage 401 N No dogs allowed in home 0 Only a small dog may be considered. N No pets Disability Related 74 N Pets are not accepted,especially dogs. N Only one pet allowed,preferably small. N Additional deposit for pet may be required N NO PETS ALLOWED N Close distance to downtown close to shopping centers freeways and schools N Good for a couple and baby N Its located near schools and shopping centers N with our convenient location to schools Household Slze/Farnily Great neighborhood-close to schools! Related 49 Good for a couple and baby • Easy walk to some of the best schools! • tocated'in the highly rated Poway School District C, • Big pool and s a perfect for a family and entertaining p I N Close to Woodland Park Middle School • Big house with plenty of room for a couple wanting to expand their family Notes: 1. Examples are direct quotes from the listings(including punctuation and emphasis). 2�. Ads may contain multiple types of potentially discriminatory language. Source:www.craigsl,ist.org,accessed March 2020. RespondLng to Ads Differential treatment of those responding to advertisements is a growing fair housing concern. In a 2011 study conducted nationally, comprehensive audit-style experiments via email correspondence were used to test for racial discrimination in the rental housing market. This study was particularly unique because it tested for two variables — discrimination based on race and social class. By responding to online rental listings using names associated with a particular racial/ethnic group and varying message content grammatically to indicate differing levels of education and/or income (i.e. social class)�, researchers found that, overall, Blacks continued, to experience statistically significant levels of discrimination in the rental housing market.This discrimination was even more pronounced when the housing inquiry was made to look like it originated from a Black individual of a lower social 48 class. Do Landlords Discriminate in the Rental Housing Market?Evidence from an Internet Field Experiment in U.S.cities. Andrew Hanson and Zackary Hawley. May 2011. 1[1, S1�111 1 cill P 1, 1"', 6: 172 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 403 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Vi ew-Ing the Unit Viewing the unit is the most obvious place where the potential renters may encounter discrimination because landlords or managers may discriminate based on race or disability, or judge on appearance whether a potential renter is, reliable or may violate any of the rules. In a follow up to the study discussed above, researchers developed an experiment to test for subtle discrimination. Subtle discrimination is defined as unequal treatment between groups that occurs but is difficult to quantify, and may not always be identifiable through common measures such as price differences. Researchers found that', in general, landlords replied faster and with longer messages to inquiries made from traditional "white" names. The study also found that landlords were more likely to use descriptive language,extend invitations to view a unit,invite further correspondence, use polite language, and make a formal greeting when replying to e-mail inquiries from a white home seeker." .CreditlIncorne Check Landlords may ask potential renters to provide credit references, lists of previous addresses and landlords, and employment history/salary. The criteria for tenant selection, if any, are typically not known to those seeking to rent. Many landlords often use credit history as an excuse when trying to exclude certain groups. Legislation provides for applicants to receive a copy of the report used to evaluate applications. The study on subtle discrimination mentioned earlier found no statistically significant evidence of discrimination in using language related to fees,asking for employment or rental history,or requesting background information. The Lease Typically, the lease or rental agreement is, a standard form completed for all units within the same building. However, the enforcement of the rules contained in the lease or agreement may not be standard for all tenants. A landlord may choose to strictly enforce the rules for certain tenants based on arbitrary factors, such as race, presence of children, or disability. Lease-related language barriers can impede fair housing choice if landlords and tenants do not speak the same language. In California, applicants and tenants have the right to negotiate lease terms primarily in Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese or Korean. If a language barrier exists, the landlord must give the tenant a written translation of the proposed lease or rental agreement in the language used in the negotiation before the tenant signs it.50 This rule applies to lease terms of one month or longer and whether the negotiations are oral or in writing. Subtle Discrimination in the Rental Housing Market:Evidence from E-mail Correspondence with Landlords.Andrew Hanson,Zackary Hawley,and Aryn Taylor.September 2011. California Civil Code Section 16�32(b) S1�,,11 c,P 1, 1", 6: 173 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 404 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Securl*(K DEJ�Zos_lt A security deposit is typically required. To deter"less-than-desirable" tenants, a landlord may ask for a security deposit higher than for others. Tenants may also face discriminatory treatment when vacating the units. For example, the landlord may choose to return a smaller portion of the security deposit to some tenants, claiming excessive wear and tear. A landlord may also require that persons with disabilities pay an additional pet rent for their service animals, a monthly surcharge for pets, or a deposit,which is also a discriminatory act. Durin�er the Ten During tenancy, the most common forms of discrimination a tenant may face are based on familial status, race, national origin, sex, or disability. Usually this type of discrimination appears in the form of varying enforcement of rules, overly strict rules for children,excessive occupancy standards,refusal to make a reasonable accommodation for handicapped access, refusal to make necessary repairs, eviction notices'. illegal entry, rent increases, or harassment. These actions may be used as a way to force undesirable tenants to move on their own without the landlord having to make an eviction. I California Apartment Association (C A A , -L_�) The California Apartment Association has developed the California Certified Residential Manager (CCRM) program to provide a comprehensive series of courses geared towards improving the approach, attitude and professional skills of on-site property managers and other interested individuals. The CCRM program consists of 31.5 hours of training that includes fair housing and ethics along with the following nine course topics: • Preparing the Property for Market • Professional Leasing Skills and the Application Process • The Move-in Process, Rent Collection and Notices • Resident Issues and Ending the Tenancy • Professional Skills for Supervisors • Maintenance Management: Maintaining a Property • Liability and Risk Management: Protecting the Investment • Fair Housing: It's the Law • Ethics in Property Management The CAA supports the intent of all local, State, and federal fair housing laws for all residents without regard to color, race, religion, sex, marital status, mental or physical disability, age, familial status, sexual orientation, or national origin. Members of the CAA agree to abide by the provisions of their Code for Equal Housing Opportunity. 6: 11,:, 174 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 405 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'� 3. National Association of Residential Property Managers (NARPM) The National Association of Residential Property Managers promotes a high standard of property management business ethics,professionalism and fair housing practices within the residential property management field. NARPM is an association of real estate professionals who are experienced in managing single-family and small residential properties. Members of the association adhere to a strict Code of Ethics to meet the needs of the community,which include the following duties,: • Protect the public from fraud, misrepresentation, and unethical practices of property managers. • Adhere to the Federal Fair Housing Stature. • Protect the fiduciary relationship of the Client. • Treat all Tenants professionally and ethically. • Manage the property in accordance with the safety and habitability standards of the community. • Hold all funds received in compliance with state law with full disclosure to the Client. NARPM offers three designations to qualified property managers and property management firms: 1. Residential Management Professional, RMP 9 2. Master Property Manager,MPM 9 3. Certified Residential Management Company, CRMC 9 Various educational courses are offered as part of attaining these designations including the following fair housing and landlord/tenant law courses: • Ethnics (required for all members every four years) • Habitability Standards and Maintenance • Marketing • Tenancy • ADA Fair Housing • Lead-Based Paint Law 4. Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association (WMA) Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association (WMA)is a nonprofit organization created in 1945 for the exclusive purpose of promoting and protecting the interests of owners, operators and developers of manufactured home communities in California. WMA assists its members in the operations of successful manufactured home communities in today's complex business and regulatory environment. WMA has over 1,700 member parks located in all 58 counties of California. WMA offers an award winning manager accreditation program as well as numerous continuing education opportunities. The Manufactured Home Community Manager (MCM) program is a manager accreditation program that provides information on effective community operations. 6: 11,:,1 175 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 406 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� WMA's industry experts give managers intensive training on law affecting the industry, maintenance standards, HCD inspections, discrimination, mediation, disaster planning, and a full range of other vital subjects. `1 * "I'll S 10 C aix . ..... cim"wes In general, fair housing services include the investigation and resolution of housing discrimination complaints, discrimination auditing and testing, and education and outreach, including the dissemination of fair housing information such as written material, workshops, and seminars. Landlord/tenant counseling is another fair housing service that involves informing landlords and tenants of their rights and responsibilities under fair housing law and other consumer protection regulations,as well as mediating disputes between tenants and landlords. This section reviews the fair housing services available in San Diego County, the nature and extent of fair housing complaints, and results of fair housing testing/audits. 10 CSA Sian Diego County (CS A It .rx) The CSA San Diego County (CSA), is an agency whose mission is to actively support and promote fair housing through education and advocacy. CSA provides the following fair housing related services: • Tenant-Landlord mediation • Fair housing counseling and dispute mediation • Educational fair housing seminars for tenants and landlords (English and Spanish and other languages upon request) • Services to tenants, landlords, and apartment managers • Real estate and rental practice discrimination audits • Free rental housing handbooks in English, Spanish, and Arabic • Legal services and advocacy • Enforcement of fair housing laws through conciliation, litigation, or administrative referrals. CSA assists residents and reports fair housing data for the cities of: • Chula Vista 0 El Cajon N National City • La Mesa 0 Santee 0 Unincorporated East County 1%Cl 0 20 Legal Aid Society ot z5an 1JIegoi (LASSD) The Legal Aid Society of San Diego (LASSD) provides fair housing services to guarantee equal housing opportunity for San Diego City and County residents. IASSD provides support through outreach, education, and enforcement of both federal and state fair housing laws. To receive services provided by LASSD the act of housing discrimination must have occurred within the County of San Diego. The LASSD Housing Team is the only full service resource in the County, providing counseling, direct legal intervention and, in-Court representation for eligible San Diego County residents. LASSD provides the following services: 6: 11':'1 176 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 407 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� • Assist or advise eligible clients • Educate community groups and tenants to increase awareness of tenant's rights and the workings of the judicial system • Conduct outreach • Assist tenants in organizing themselves to take legal action LASSD is currently under contract with the City of San Diego to provide fair housing services. However, the agency assists residents throughout the Count:y and the cities of: • Carlsbad W Coronado W Del Mar • Encinitas N Escondido N Imperial Beach • Lemon Grove N Oceanside N Poway • San Diego W San Marcos W Solana Beach • Vista 0 San Diego County 3. OveraH Service Coverage Overall, the region is well served by multiple agencies for fair housing services. However, residents may find it hard to navigate the service system and identify the appropriate agency for contact. A jurisdiction's contract for fair housing service providers may also change year to year. To ensure the public is well aware of available services, the SDRAFFH and local jurisdictions should update their websites and outreach materials frequently. Furthermore, consistent recordkeeping formats would assist in the compilation and analysis of fair housing data across agencies. ","I n """'I)II001 of F.ai"Ir 11 t a, d, 40 0 0 .1. usi ncr (DFE,111�11) The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) investigates complaints of employment and housing discrimination based on race, sex, religious creed, color, national origin, medical condition (cured cancer only), ancestry, physical or mental disability, marital status, or age (over 40 only). DFEH also investigates complaints of housing discrimination based on the above classes, as well as children/age, and sexual orientation. DFEH established a program in May 2003 for mediating housing discrimination complaints,which is a first for the State of California and is the largest fair housing mediation program in the nation to be developed under HUD's Partnership Initiative with state fair housing enforcement agencies. The program provides California's tenants, landlords, and property owners and managers with a means of resolving housing discrimination cases in a fair, confidential, and cost-effective manner. Key features of the program are: 1) program is free of charge to the parties;and 2) mediation takes place within the first 30 days of the filing of the complaint, often avoiding the financial and emotional costs associated with a full DFEH investigation and potential litigation. After a person calls in for a complaint, an interview takes place, documentation is obtained and is,s,ues are discussed to decide on the course to proceed. Mediation/conciliation is offered as a viable alternative to litigation. If the mediation/conciliation is successful, the case is closed after a brief case 6: 11,:, 177 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 408 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"F'S'� follow-up. If the mediation/conciliation is unsuccessful,the case is then referred to DFEH or HUD. If during case development further investigation is deemed necessary,testing may be performed. Once the investigation is completed, the complainant is advised of the alternatives available in proceeding with the complaint,which include:mediation/ conciliation,administrative filing with HUD or DFEH, referral for consideration to the Department of justice, Civil Rights Division, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section, or referral to a private attorney for possible litigation. Iq * "I'll S 0 0 E 14 aix . ..... tatistics As part of the enforcement and tracking services provided by the above mentioned fair housing service providers, intake and documentation of all complaints and inquiries result in the compilation of statistics provided to each jurisdiction in the form of quarterly and annual reports. However,because the various agencies that provide fair housing services in the County each have their own intake forms, the amount and specificity of available fair housing data is highly uneven throughout the County and difficult to use for regional comparisons and analyses. The following sections summarize fair housing statistics in San Diego County using available data and sources. 10 CSA San Diego County (CSA) HOU4�jn�IJISCTIM_Inatlon comp&i�nts Between FY 2014 and FY 2018,CSA provided fair housing services to approximately 1,000,San Diego County residents per year—for a total of 6, 276 clients over the five-year period (Table 74). The majority of CSA's clients during this period came from El Cajon(35 percent),Chula Vista(21 percent), and the unincorporated County. Table 74: CSA Clients Served (FY 2014-2018�)* Jurisdiction Clients Served %of Total FY 2014-2019 Carlsbad 192 3% Chula Vista 11)329 21% El Cajon 21191 35% La Mesa 611 10% National City 688 11% Santee 276 4% Unincorporated 989 16% LTotai Clients 6)276 100% 1 Source:CSA San Diego,February2020. *Data provided only for FY 2014 and FY 2,015,for Carlsbad and the Unincorporated communities. Statistics reported throughout San Diego County indicate that low-income persons,regardless of race, are the most frequently impacted by fair housing issues. The vast majority of CSA's clients (95 percent) between FY 2014 and FY 2018 were either extremely low or very low income (Table 75). Consistent with the demographic makeup of the region, White residents represented a substantial S1�,,11 c'P 1, 1"" 6: 178 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 409 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� proportion of clients served (41 percent, Table 76)�. However, there is some indication that fair housing issues disproportionately affect certain racial/ethnic groups. For example, Black residents made up less than an average 4.1 percent of the population in the cities that CSA serves (Table 76), but represented 10 percent of fair housing clients served. Table 75: CSA Clients Served by Income Level (FY 2014-�2018)* Income 2014-�15 2015-16 2016-�17 2017-18 2018-19 Total Percent Extremely Low Income 1410 1474 890 843 587 51204 83% (<30(-Yo AMI) Low Income 152 ill 1 O�4 113 294 774 12% (<50'Yo.AMI) Moderate Income 31 35 15 13 68 162 3% (<80'Yo.AMI) >80%AMI 40 24 24 10 38 136 2% Total Clients 1 1)633 1 116�44 1 1)033 1 979 1 987 1 6)276 1 100% Source:CSA San Dieup,February 2020. *Data provided only for FY 2014 and FY 2015 for Carlsbad and the"Unincorporated communities Table 76: CSA Clients Served by Race/Ethnicity (FY 2014-2018)* 41111 Total, Percent Income 2014-1 2015-101'' 2016-11 2017-1 2018 Race Hispanic 527 561 423 395 486 2)392 38% Non-Hispanic 1�106 1�083 610, 584 5010 1 3)883 62% Total Clients 1)63 1)644 1)033 979 986 6,275 100% Ethnicity White 757 741 402 373 269 2)542 41% Black/African American 175 171 90 100 92 628 10% Asian 27 32 45 38 22 164 3% Hawaiian/Pacific fslander 32 18 5 19 75 149 2% American Indian/Alaska Native 7 5 2 44 106 164 3% Other/Multi-Racial 635 677 489 405 423 2)629 �42% Total Clients 1)633 1)644 1)033 979 987 6)276 100% Source:CS.A San Diegro,February 2020. *Data provided only for FY 2014 and FY 2015 for Carlsbad and the Unincorporated communities Education and Outreach Efforts CSA conducts regular workshops and educational presentations, including general Fair Housing workshops and those specifically held to educate and address the needs of small property owners. Workshops and presentations cover a wide range of issues including tenant and landlord rights and responsibilities, notices to vacate, substandard conditions, and foreclosures. From FY 2014 to FY 20181 CSA conducted over 424 fair housing events in Carlsbad, Chula Vista, El Cajon, La Mesa, National City, San Diego, Santee, and unincorporated communities like East County and Bonita. A list of the events and location of events hosted by CSA from FY 2015 to FY 2018 is found in Appendix C. 6: 11:' 179 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 410 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� Additionally, as, members of the Newcomer Network, which provides resources to new and non- English speaking immigrants/refugees, CSA commits to providing services to the local immigrant community. These include helping develop and distribute resource guides for this community such as the English as a Second Language (ESL) Resource Guide, and being a resource for landlord/tenants' rights, hate crime prevention and immigration advocacy. To remain involved and up-to-date on issues concerning fair housing, CSA attends the quarterly meetings and serves on the steering committee of the San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDRAFFH). During these meetings CSA and other fair housing providers discuss challenges, resources and strategies for addressing fair housing in San Diego County. I Legal Aid Society San Diego (LASSD) HOU4�jn�1,11SCTIM_Inatlon compkiLnts Between FY 2014 and FY 2018, LASSD served over 19,000 San Diego County residents (Table 77). The majority of LASSD client households during this five-year time period resided in the City of San Diego (53 percent), El Cajon (nine percent) and Oceanside (eight percent). Table 77: LASSD- Clients Served (FY 2014-�2018) Jurisdiction Clients Served %of Total FY 2014-2019 Carlsbad 323 2% Chula Vista 11494 8% Coronado 38 0% Del Mar 17 0% El Cajon 1 M6 9(yo Encinitas 116 1('Yo Escondido 861 4(yo Imperial Beach 341 TY0 La Mesa 597 3% Lemon Grove 310 2% National City 557 3% Oceanside 1452 8% Poway 81 Wyo San Diego 1(003 53% San Marcos 287 1% Santee 224 1% Solana Beach 21 0% Vista 658 3% Total Clients 19)326 100% Source:Legal Aid Society San Diego,February 2020. 6: 180 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 411 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'� The vast majority of clients served by LASSD were lower income (87 percent) and white (66 percent) (Table 77 and Table 78). Based on the data reported by LASSD�, fair housing issues disproportionately affected some San Diego County residents. For example, Black. residents made up less than five percent of the total County population, yet represented 24 percent of fair housing complainants. Table 78: LASSD- Clients Served by Income Level (FY 2014-�2018)* Income 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19* Total Percent Extremely Low Income 5)603 5)177 5)187 5�256 2.1542 23,765 54% (<300/0 AMI) Low Income 31193 31233 31214 21985 1)541 147166 32% (<50('/o_AMI) Moderate Income 6�53 813 875 682 362 3)385 8�% (<80('/o_AMI) >800/(,,)AMI 459 467 544 579 315 21364 5% Total Clients 1 %908 1 %690 1 %820 1 %502 1 41760 43,680 1 100% Source:LASSD,February 2020. Only includes data for Q1 and Q2 of f-�Y2018-19 Table 79: SSD- Clients Served by Race/Ethnl'cl'ty (FY 2014-2018) Race Race and Ethnicity 2014-�15 2015-�16 2016-17 21017-18* 21018-19 Total Percent Hispanic 1)138 1)134 1)160 1)144 1�231 5�807 29% Non-Hispanic 2�673 2�655 2)854 2)8601 21977 14)019 71% 826 Total Clients 3)811 3)789 4)0�14 4)0�04 4)20�8 19) 100% Ethnicity White 25532 25532 2�651 2�61 0 25782 13)107 66% Black/African American 897 926 980 970 968 41741 24% Asian 152 141 159 137 117 706 4% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0% American Indian/Alaska Native 33 51 38 54 50 226 1% Other/Muld-Ractal 197 139 186 238 291 1)051 5% Total Clients 3)811 3)789 410�14 410�09 4)20�8 19)831 100% ==J Source:LASSD,February 2020. Education and Outreach Efforts LASSD works to stop housing discrimination, ensuring equal housing opportunities for all people in the City and County of San Diego;through outreach,education,and enforcement of Federal and State Fair Housing Laws. They provide free help for tho�se who qualify that are having housing problems or questions about their rights as a tenant, as well as, those who have questions about their security deposits. LASSD also meets monthly with the City of San Diego and Housing Opportunities Collaborative in order to evaluate service gaps and to ensure an adequate level of service is available to all residents. In addition,LASSD has established a Fair Housing Hotline to ensure its Fair Housing services are readily 6: 1[" 181 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 412 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� available to the community and that a resident may promptly report any act of housing discrimination that may have occurred. Walk-in services are also offered at three office locations in San Diego County- Southeast, Midtown, and North County. 1111110, T r 14a,ix 1.,' S111 estit'i The purpose of fair housing testing is to determine if, and to what extent, discriminatory business practices exist in apartment rental housing and related markets. In response to the recommendation from the previous Al, some jurisdictions have begun to conduct fair housing testing routinely. Other jurisdictions contracted for fair housing testing for the purpose of this Al report in order to provide additional information on potential housing discrimination in their communities. However,it should be noted that since fair housing testing was not conducted consistently and systematically by all jurisdictions, more findings of discriminatory practices in one community that conducts regular fair housing tests cannot be interpreted as having more extensive housing discrimination, compared to other communities that have not conducted testing as frequently. le Methodoloory Z5J Methodologies may vary,but generally,testing involves volunteer testers screened for appropriateness and then trained. Training may include an overview and history of fair housing laws,methodology of testing, and reinforcement of the qualities needed in a tester. Those qualities include objectivity, reliability, flexibility and the ability to maintain co�nfidentiality throughout the project. A practice test and/or role-playing a site visit are also included to assure that testers are fully prepared. The project supervisor will find apartment vacancies by viewing advertisements on Craig's List, For Rent Magazine, other rental guides and online resources. A matched pair of testers, one representing the variable being tested, and the other as a control are then assigned and given their identit-y for each proj ect. Legal Aid Society and CSA San Diego provided the results of Fair Housing Testing between FY 2015 and FY 2018 in the cities of Chula Vista, Carlsbad, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, National City, Oceanside, San Diego City, Santee, Vista, and San Diego County. All testing was done in the rental market. Detailed breakdown of tests by jurisdiction and testing variables can be found in Table 9. I Testing Results Chula Vista: Between FY 2015 and FY 2020, Chula Vista tested for discrimination on the basis of race, familial status, disability, and gender. Of the eight sites tested, one showed differential treatment on the basis of race, four were inconclusive, and three showed no differential treatment. Carlsbad:Between FY 2017 and FY 2018,Carlsbad tested for discrimination on the basis of disability, familial status, sexual orientation, and race. Of the 47 sites tested, four showed unequal treatment to the Potential renter, three on the basis of disability (reasonable accommodation) and one on the basis of sexual orientation. S1�,,11 P 1, 1"" 6: 182 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 413 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P[��,'JH N4 E F"[`S'� El Cajon: El Cajon tested for discrimination based on familial status, race, and gender. Of the eight sites tested, five showed differential treatment; three due to familial status and two due to race. Encinitas: In Encinitas,during tests conducted in FY 2016 through FY 2�01 8,,only one out of 13 sites showed some disparity in treatment when testing for sexual orientation. Escondido: Between FY 2016 and FY 20185 53 sites were tested in Escondido for discrimination on the basis of disability, familial status, sexual orientation, and race. Of the 53 tests, eight showed disparate treatment. Five showed unequal treatment when testing for disability (reasonable accommodation) and three showed unequal treatment on the basis of sexual orientation. Imperial Beach: In FY 2020, Imperial Beach tested for discrimination based on national origin at one site and showed disparate treatment. La Mesa: La Mesa tested for discriminatio�n based on disability and race at two sites. The site tested for race showed unequal treatment and the site tested for disability was inconclusive. National City: In FY 2020,National City tested for discrimination based on disability,national origin and race. Of the six sites tested, three showed unequal treatment; one based on national origin and two based on race. Oceanside: Oceanside tested for discrimination based on disability, familial status, sexual orientation, and race. Of the 47 sites tested)eight sites showed disparate treatment;six due to disability (reasonable accommodation) and two due to familial status. San Diego City: The City of San Diego conducted a total of 134 audit tests between FY 2016 and FY 20�2O�. The following variables were tested in the rental housing market: disability (reasonable accommodation and reasonable modification),familial status,national origin,race,and religion.When testing for discrimination in San Diego, it was, more likely to find disparate treatment requesting reasonable accommodations. Of the 18 sites that had disparate treatment, 12 of them were due to reasonable accommodations. Additionally, three sites had unequal treatment due to familial status and three due to national origin. San Marcos: Of the 28 audit tests conducted in the City of San Marcos between FY 2016 through FY 2018, two sites had discriminatory treatment- one based on sexual orientation and one based on race. The City also tested for familial status and disability (reasonable accommodation) but no discriminatory treatment was found. Vista: In the 43 fair housing audits conducted in the City of Vista,four variables were tested: disability (reasonable accommodation and reasonable modification), sexual orientation, and race. The tests found that individuals were discriminated against on the basis of disability (reasonable accommodation) (two cases) and race (one case). Santee: In FY 2020, Santee tested for discrimination based on national origin and race at two sites. The site tested for race showed differential treatment. 6: 11':' 183 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 414 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"F'S'� San Diego Urban County: Testing was conducted in the County with a total of 118 sites tested for familial status., race, and disability (reasonable accommodation). Disparate treatment was found at 16 sites for all variables: five cases for familial status, six cases for race, and five cases for disability. 1[1, S1�111 1 cill P 1, 1"" 6: 184 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 415 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL "o �,vll 1"t C A-1 Table 80�: Fair Housing Audit Testing FY 2015-FY 20,20, Findings City FY Test Variable Test Total# Differential Inconclusive No Differential Market of Sites Treatment Treatment Total % Total % Total % 2015 Race Rental 3 1 33% 0 0% 2 67% 2020 Familial Status Rental 1 01 01 1 100% 0 0 Chula Vista 2020 Dis-RA Rental 3 01 01 2 66% 1 33% 2020 Gender Rental 1 01 01 1 100% 0 0 Total 8 1 13% 4 50% 3 38% 2017 Dis-RA Rental 15 1 40/() 1 4% 13 54% 2017 Familial Status Rental 1 01 00/() 01 0% 1 4% 2017 Sexual Orientation Rental 8 1 40/() 01 0% 7 29% Carlsbad 2018 Dis-RA Rental 15 2 90/() 3 13% 10 43% 2018 Dis-RM Rental 1 0 (No 0 0% 1 4% 2018 Race Rental 7 0 0% 0 0(YO 7 30% Total 47 4 9% 4 9% 39 83% 2020 Familial Status Rental 5 3 60% 2 40% 0(YO El Cajon 2020 Race R e n ta,1 2 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2020 Gender Rental 1 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% Total 8 5 63% 3 38% 0 0% 2016 Dis-RA Rental 1 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 2016 Familial Status Rental 3 0 0% 0 O(Yo 3 75% 2017 Dis-RA Rental 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 Encinitas 2017 Sexual Orientation Rental 3 1 0.25 0 2 0.5 2018 Dis-RA Rental 3 0 3 0.6 2018 Race Rental 2 0 0 0 0 2 0.4 Total 13 1 8% 0 0% 12 92% Escondido 2016 Dis-RA Rental 10 0 0% 1 7% 9 60% (J S1�11111111111 c,p 1, 1", 6: 1,A]ML 11,:1 185 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 416 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL "o �,vll 1"t C A-1 Table 80�: Fair Housing Audit Testing FY 2015-FY 20,20, Findings City FY Test Variable Test Total# Differential Inconclusive No Differential Market of Sites Treatment Treatment Total % Total % Total % 2016 Familial Status Rental 3 01 0% 01 0"/o 3 20"/o 2016 Familial Status Rental 2 0 0% 1 7% 1 7% 2017 Dis-RA Rental 8 2 11(V() 0 0% 6 32% 2017 Sexual Orientation Rental 11 3 16% 0 0% 8 42% 2018 Dis-RA Rental 7 3 16% 0 0% 4 21% 2018 Dis-RM Rental 5 01 00/() 01 0% 5 26% 2018 Race Rental 7 01 00/() 01 0% 7 37% Total 5�3 8 15% 2 �4% 43 81% MJSvil"11,1111c, I", 6: 1,A]ML 11,:1 186 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 417 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL "o �,vll 1"t 1"', C A-1 Table 80�: Fair Housing Audit Testing FY 2015-FY 20,20, Findings City FY Test Variable Test Total# Differential Inconclusive No Differential Market of Sites Treatment Treatment Total % Total % Total % Imperial Beach 2020 National Origin Rental 1 1 1010% 01 0"/o 0 0"/o Total 1 1 1 0 0% 0 0% 2020 Dis-RA Rental 1 0 (V() 1 100% % La Mesa 2020 Race Rental 1 1 10()(V() 0 0% 0% Total 2 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 2020 Dis-RA Rental 1 01 00/() 01 0% 1 100% 2020 National Origin Rental 1 1 10100/() 01 0% 0 0% National City 2020 Race Rental 4 2 500/() 2 50% 0 0% Total 6 3 50�% 2 33% 1 17% 2016 Dis-RA Rental 10 2 13% 2 13% 6 40% 2016 Familial Status Rental 4 1 7% 0 0(YO 3 20% 2016 Familial Status Rental 1 1 7% 0 0(YO 0(YO 2017 Dis-RA Rental 8 3 19% 0 0(YO 5 31(Yo Oceanside 2017 Sexual Orientation Rental 8 0 0% 0 0% 8 50% 2018 Dis-RA Rental 6 1 6% 1 6% 4 25% 2018 Dis-RM Rental 5 0 0% 0 0% 5 31% 2018 Race Rental 5 0 0% 0 0% 5 31% Total 47 8 17% 3 6% 36 77% 2016 Dis-RA Rental 27 4 9% 6 13% 17 36% 2016 Familial Status Rental '14 0 O(Y(� 3 6% 11 23% San Diego City 2016 Familial Status Rental 6 1 2(Yo 2 4% 3 6% 2017 Dis-RA, Rental 21 3 14% 1 5% 17 81% 2018 Dis-RA, Rental 24 4 9% 3 7% 17 37% 2018 Dis-RM Rental 1 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% MJSvil"11,1111c, I", 6: 1,A]ML 11,:1 187 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 418 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL "o �,vll 1"t C A-1 Table 80�: Fair Housing Audit Testing FY 2015-FY 20,20, Findings City FY Test Variable Test Total# Differential Inconclusive No Differential Market of Sites Treatment Treatment Total % Total % Total % 2018 National Origin Rental 21 1 2% 01 0"/o 20 43"/o 2019 Familial Status Rental 3 0 0% 3 100% 0 0% 2019 Race Rental 1 0 (No 1 100% 0% 2019 Religion Rental 2 0 (No 2 100% 0% 2019 National Origin Rental 3 2 66% 1 33% 0% 2020 Familial Status Rental 3 1 330/() 2 66% 0 0% 2020 Dis-RA Rental 1 1 10100/() 01 0% 0 0% 2020 Race Rental 3 01 00/() 3 100% 0 0% 2020 Familial Status Rental 4 1 250/() 3 75% 0 0% Total 134 18 13% 30 22% 86 64% 2016 Familial Status Rental 4 0 0% 0 0(YO 4 80% 2016 Familial Status Rental 1 0 0% 1 20% 0(YO 2017 Dis-RA Rental 5 0 0% 2 20% 3 30% San Marcos 2017 Sexual Orientation Rental 5 1 10% 0% 4 40% 2018 Dis-RA Rental 9 0 0% 0 0% 9 69% 2018 Race Rental 4 1 8% 0 0% 3 23% Total 28 2 7% 3 11% 23 82% 2016 Dis-RA Rental 9 0 0% 2 22% 7 78% 2017 Dis-RA Rental 8 2 13% 13% 6 13% 2017 Sexual Orientation Rental 8 13% 1 13% 7 13(Yo Vista 2018 Dis-RA Rental O(Y() 0(yo 10 50% 2018 Dis-RM Rental 2 0 0% 0 0% 2 10% 2018 Race Rental 8 1 5% 0 0% 7 35% Total 1 45 j 3 j 7% j 3 j 7% j 39 j 87% (J S1�11111111111 c,p 1, 1", 6: 1,A]ML 11,:1 188 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 419 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL "o �'vll 1"t C Table 80�: Fair Housing Audit Testing FY 2015-FY 20,20, Findings City FY Test Variable Test Total# Differential Inconclusive No Differential Market of Sites Treatment Treatment Total % Total % Total % 2020 National Origin Rental 1 01 0% 1 "/o 0 0"/o Santee 2020 Race Rental 1 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% Total 2 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 2016 Familial Status Rental 40 5 13% 10 25% 25 63% 2017 Race Rental 37 6 16% 4 11% 27 73% San Diego County 2018 Dis-RA Rental 39 5 120/() 01 0% 34 83% 2018 Familial Status Rental 1 01 00/() 0 0% 1 2% 2018 Race Rental 1 01 00/() oil 0% 1 2% Total 118 16 14% 14 12% 88 75% Note:Dis-RA refers to disability-reasonable accommodation(RA)and Dis-RM refers to disability-reasonable modification(RM). Source:LASSDI,February 2020;CS.A San Diego,May 2020. (J S1�11111111111 c'p 1, 1", Q" ly"'r 111,��' 6: 1,A,1 R,11,:,1 189 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 420 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F'AlR P'o ,I "I'll"Itili,ent of HO"Lisnii ai id. U rban, Go 1.),0 S e "D111 ,e 1'.)evelopni,ei it The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) maintains a record of all housing discrimination complaints filed in local jurisdictions. These grievances can be filed on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, religion, familial status and retaliation. From October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2019, 414 fair housing complaints in San Diego County were filed with HUD (Table 10). About 44 percent of complaints filed were from residents of the Cit-y of San Diego. A fair number of complaints were also filed from residents of Oceanside (11 percent) and Chula Vista (seven percent). Overall, disability-related discrimination was the most commonly reported—compri sing 53 percent of all cases (Table 11). Complaints concerning race (12 percent),retaliation(10 percent),and familial status (nine percent) were also regularly reported. Half of all complaints filed (50 percent or 206 cases) were deemed to have no cause and another 28 percent (115 cases) were conciliated or settled. MJSvil"111111k, 1"" Q" ly"'r 6: FA,l R,11':'1 190 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 421 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL "o 1: �vll 1"t 1", C A-1 Table 81: Basis for Discrimination of Fair Housing Cases filed with HUD (FY 2014-2018)�* 1 ility Familial National Race Religion A d #of Jurisdiction Color D'*sab'* Status Origin Retali ion Sex Totv Cases % Carlsbad 1 11 1 0 3 1 0 0 17 14 3.4% Chula Vista 1 is 5 3 2 1 4 1 35 29 7.0% Coronado 0 2 2 2 0.5% Del Mar 0 1 1 2 2 0.5% El Cajon 0 10 10 6 5 3 2 3 39 25 6.0% fl.ncinitas 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 1.2'Y(,) I'l.scondido 0 9 0 1 3 0 2 0 15 13 3.1'Y(,.) Imperial Beach 0 4 1 0 2 0 2 1 10 7 1.7'Y(,.) f,a Mesa 0 7 0 1 1 0 2 1 12 9 2.2'Y(,) Lemon Grove 0 3 0 0 0 3 3 0.7% National City 0 10 0 0 1 2 13 11 2.7% Oceanside 0 40 5 0 4 4 3 56 47 11.4% Powa 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 5 4 1.0% San Diego 1 122 14 17 30 4 24 24 236 183 44.2% San Marcos 0 4 0 1 4 0 1 0 10 9 2.2% Santee 0 6 1 0 1 0 2 1 11 9 2.2% Solana Beach 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 5 4 1.0% Vista 0 6 2 2 1 0 0 0 11 10 2.4(Vo Unincorporated 1 19 6 6 6 5 43 28 6.8(Vo Total 4 281 46 32 6�3 12 52 40 530 414 100.0% % 0.8% 53.0% 8.7% 6.0% 11.9�% 2.3,% 9.8% 7.5% 10�0.0�% Source: U.S,.Department of Housing and Urban Development,February 2020. Data represents HUD's fiscal years(October 1-Septemb,er 3(,-)) 171": r",i,()�11111,i P I A�111111,1 191 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 422 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL "o 1: �'vll 1"t C A-1 Table 82: Closing Categories for Fair Housing Cases filed With HUD (FY 2014-2018)* Complaint Complaint Dismissed Unable to Compliant No Cause FHAP Withdrawn Withdrawn Conciliation for Lack of Locate Failed to Deter- judicial by by N/A #of % jurisdictio Compliant Cooperate mination Consent Complainant Complainant Settlement Cases n Order Without After successful Resolution Resolution Carlsbad 0 0 5 2 6 1 14 3.4% Chula Vista 0 0 0 11 1 1 4 11 1 29 7.0'Y(,) Coronado 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0.5% D�el Mar 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.5% El Cajon 0 0 0 12 0 0 3 6 4 25 6.0'Y(,.) Encinitas 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 5 1.2% Escondido 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 5 0 13 3.1'Y(,.) Imperial Beach 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 1 7 1.7'Y(,.) La Mesa 0 0 5 0 1 3 0 9 2.2% Lemon Grove 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 0.7% National City 0 0 6 0 0 2 3 0 11 2.71'Vo Oceanside 1 0 22 4 5 3 12 0 47 11.4�0 Poway 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 1.0% San Diego 5 0 4 101 0 4 8 47 14 183 44.2�0 San Marcos 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 3 1 9 2.2% Santee 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 3 1 9 2.2% Solana Beach 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 4 1.0('V() Vista 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 1 2 10 2.4% Unincorporated 3 1 0 11 0 1 3 9 0 28 6.8% Total County 9 1 4 206 1 5 15 33 115 26 414 100.0% % 2.2% 0.2% 1.0�% 49.8% 1 1.2% 3�.6%, 8.0�% 27.8%, 6.3% 100.0% Source:U.S.Department of Housing and Urban,Development,February 2020.*Data represents HUD,'s fiscal years(October I-September 30) (J S1�,,11 c'P i'i'()1"1, 1", Q" ly"'I"111,��'1'?6: FA,l R,11,:,1 192 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 423 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[Pld P N4 E F"[`S'� 1`L�xte Crimes Hate crimes are crimes that are committed because of a bias against race, religion, disability, ethnicity., or sexual orientation. In an attempt to determine the scope and nature of hate crimes, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Uniform Crime Reporting Program collects statistics on these incidents. To a certain degree,hate crimes are an indicator of the environmental context of discrimination.These crimes should be reported to the Police or Sheriff's department. On the other hand, a hate incident is an action or behavior that is motivated by hate but is protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of expression. Examples of hate incidents can include name-calling, epithets, distribution of hate material in public places, and the display of offensive hate-motivated material on one's property. The freedom guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, such as the freedom of speech, allows hateful rhetoric as long as it does not interfere with the civil rights of others. Only when these incidents escalate can they be considered an actual crime. Statistics compiled by the FBI found that a total of 479 hate crimes were committed in San Diego County from 2013 to 2018 (Table 83�). Race-based hate crimes were the most common (54 percent); though, hate crimes motivated by sexual orientation (26 percent), and religion (19 percent) were also commonly reported. During the six-year period from 2013 to 2018, the incidence of reported hate crimes in all of San Diego County was less than one per 1,000 people (0.15 per 1,000 persons). This figure has also substantially declined from a decade earlier (the seven-year period from 2007 to 2013) when the incidence of hate crimes in the County was O�.23 per 1,000 persons. Hate crime statistics varied somewhat from jurisdiction to jurisdiction—with the cities of Del Mar (zero incidents), Solana Beach (zero incidents), and Coronado (0.04) having the lowest incidence rates and the cities of Imperial Beach (0.22), Escondido (0.17), Oceanside (0.16), and San Diego (0.16) having the highest incidence rates. It should be noted that these statistics may also reflect a higher incidence of reporting crime in certain communities,which consistently have very low overall crime rates. 1-111 1A,1`11," R 7": r",i()�,,i P I V,J 193 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 424 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL "o 1:�'�'vll 1"t 1"', C A-1 Table 83: Hate Crimes (FY 2013-2018) Race/ Sexual Gender Jurisdiction E t h nicit y Religion Orientation Disability Gender Identity Total % Incidence Ancest�X Urban County Cities Coronado 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.2% 0.04 Del Mar 0 0.0% 0.00 Imperial Beach 4 1 1 0 6 1.3% 0.22 flemon Grove 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0.6'Y(,.) 0.11 Powa, 0 2 1 0 () 3 0.6% 0.06 Solana Beach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0(Y�') 0.00 Entitlement jurisdictions Carlsbad 10 5 1 0 16 3.3'Yo 0.14 Chula Vista 8 3 6 0 0 0 17 3.5(Y(,.) 0.06 El Cajon 9 0 4 0 13 2.7% 0.12 Encinitas 4 4 0 0 0 8 1.7"Vo 0.13 Escondido 23 2 1 0 0 0 26 5.4% 0.17 La Mesa 4 1 1 0 0 0 6 1.3"Vo 0,10 National Citv 5 0 2 0 0 0 7 1.5% 0.11 Oceanside 19 5 5 0 0 0 29 6.1% 0.16 0.16 San D�iego 102 51 72 0 0 7 232 48.4�0 San Marcos 3 2 1 0 0 0 6 1.3% 0.06 Santee 5 1 2 0 0 0 8 1.7"Vo 0.14 Vista 9 2 4 0 0 0 15 3.1"Vo 0.15 Unincorporated 9 24 0 0 0 83 17.3% 0.02 Total County 25,7 89 126 0 0 7 479 100.0% m4 Percentage 5�3.7% 18.6% 26.3% 0.0% 0.01% 1.5% 100.0% L� I I I I I Source:U.S.Department of justice Federal Bureau of Investigation,Cnime Statistics,2013-2018. r",i �11111,i P I V111111il 194 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 425 of 768 F,.A.,1]R6. 1111111111111111111111ou SI ,,ACTIO"N"" PL�,A,�"?.� AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS,To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE �0 ""Ihis chapter builds upon the previous analyses and presents a list of specific actions jurisdictions in the region are planning to undertake in order to address the impediments. Impediments and recommendations are grouped in the following categories: .A. Regil"on'ttl ts The following is a summary of recommended actions to address regional impediments. Impediments and recommended actions are modified to reflect current conditions, feasibility, and past efforts. 10 Lending and Credit Counsefing ImiDediments-., Hispanics and Blacks, continue to be under-�represented in the homebuyer market and experienced large disparities in loan approval rates. • White applicants were noticeably overrepresented in the loan applicant pool,while Hispanics were severely underrepresented. The underrepresentatio�n of Hispanics was most acute in the cities of Imperial Beach (-30 percent),Vista (-32 percent), and Escondido (-33 percent). • Approval rates for Black and Hispanic applicants were well below the approval rates for White and Asian applicants in the same income groups. Specifically, Black applicants, consistently had the lowest approval rates compared to other racial/ethnic groups in the same income groups.The largest discrepancies (between loan approval rates for White and Asian applicants versus Black and Hispanic applicants) in 2017 were recorded in the cities, of El Cajon, Encinitas, and San Marcos. • Black and Hispanic applicants continued to get higher-priced (subprime) loans more frequently than White and Asian applicants. Timeframe 4-1 U 7� C� _7� ct 7� U U Recommended Actions 10 -75 U V) ct Lri C) 0 U U, ct U ct C/� lz� ct —0 t� ct ct Coordinate with the Reinvestment Task Force to receive annual Annually reportinLy from the Task Force on C) Progress in outreach and education. 2, Overco�ncentration of Housing Choice Vouchers r"'i()�,,i P I V,J 195 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 426 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'� Impediments: Due to the geographic disparity in terms of rents, concentrations of Housing Choice Voucher use have occurred. El Cajon and National City continue to experience high rates of voucher use. Timeframe ct 4--J 7� V) 7� ct 7:� �J U U 7� U Recommended Actions 10 ct 4-J V) U Ic Expand the affordable housing Ongoing inventory,as funding allows. Promote the Housing Choice Voucher program to rental property owners, in collaboration with the Ongoing various housing authorities in the region. Increase outreach and education, through the fair housing service providers,regarding the State's new Source of Income Protection (SB 329 and SB 222), defining Housing By the end of 2020, and annually thereafter Choice Vouchers as legitimate source of income for housing. These new housing laws went into ffectJanuary 1,2020. 1 I Housing Options Impediments.: Housing choices for special needs groups, especially persons with disabilities, are limited. • Housing options for special needs groups, especially for seniors and persons with disabilities, are limited. Affordable programs and public housing projects have long waiting lists. • Approximately 23 percent of the applicant-households on the waiting list for Public Housing and 22 percent on the waiting list for Housing Choice Vouchers include one disabled member. • Approximately 10 percent of the applicant-households on the waiting list for Public Housing and 11 percent on the waiting list for Housing Cho�ice Vouchers are seniors. 1[1, S1�111 1 cill P 1, 1"', 6: 196 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 427 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P[��,"Dl N4 E F"F'S'� Timeframe 4_j T_-� U 7� 7� ct blo ct .-..q V� q) 4_� U Recommended Actions Ic 7� a) __� U ct 17" U U cl� C11 C" ct 0 CA V) Increase housing options for special needs populations,including persons with disabilities, senior households, families with children, farmworkers, the homeless, etc. Specifically, amend the Zoning Code to address the following pursuant to new State laws: Low Barrier Navigation Center (111'B 101) 1A Review zoning provisions as part of the 6thcycle Housing Element update,due Supportive Housing �_i 1B April 15,2021 139) Emergency Shelter for the 1A Homeless �_L X.B 139) Accessory Dwelling Units (ABs 68, 671, 881, and 587 and SB 13) See actions under jurisdictional - Speci ic Impediments — Public Policies. Encourage universal design principles in new housing Ongoing I developments. Educate city/county building, planning, and housing staff on Ongoing I accessibility requirements Encourage inter-departmental Ongoing collaboration 1[1, S1�111 1 cill P 1, 1"" 6: 197 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 428 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P[��,"Dl N4 E FT'S'� 4. Enforcement lmvedi*ments; Enforcement activities are ll*ml*ted. • Fair housing services focus primarily on outreach and education; less emphasis is p�laced on enforcement. • Fair housing testing should be conducted regularly. Timeframe 7� 7:� tc te �:l U 4_4 Recommended Acti"ons I coo 0 U U d U t� c: d Provide press releases to local medias on outcomes of fair housing Semi-annually complaints and litigation. Support stronger and more persistent enforcement activity by Ongoing fair housing service providers. Conduct random testing on a regular basis to identify issues, trends, and problem properties. Expand testing to investigate Conduct testing every other year or as warranted by emerging trends e e trends of suspected discriminatorl Eractices, 1[1, S1�111 1 cill P 1, 1"" 6: 198 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 429 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A_1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P[��,"Dl N4 E F"[`S'� PW I)e Outreach and Education 0 Impediment. Today, people obtain information through many media forms, not limited to traditional newspaper noticing or other print forms. • Increasingly fewer people rely on the newspapers to receive information. Public notices and printed flyers are costly and ineffective means to reach the community at large. • Frequent workshops with targeted population should be conducted to allow for meaningful discussions and dissemination of useful info�rmation. Timeframe 4_� V) 75 t� 7� Ct 0 a) 4_4 Recommended Actions 10 7� V) a) C" r_l 4--� Ct U 0 U U cl� U Ct C/� �t Education and outreach activities to be conducted as a multi-media campaign,including social media such as Facebook) Ongoing Twitter, and Instagram, as well as other meeting/discussion forums such as chat rooms and webinars. Involve neighborhood groups and other community organizations Ongoing when conducting outreach and education activities. Include fair housing outreach as Ongoing part of community events. 1[1, S1�111 1 cill P 1, 1"" 6: 199 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 430 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"[PId P N4 E F"[`S'� 6. Racial See-w-reevation and Linguistic Isolation 9 9 Impediment- Patterns of racial and ethnic concentrati I on are present within p�articular areas 0 of the San Diego region. • In San Diego County, 15.4 percent of residents indicated they spoke English "less than very well" and can be considered linguistically isolated. • The cities of National City,Chula Vista,El Cajon,and Escondido have the highest percentage of total residents who spoke English "less than very well". Most of these residents were Spanish speakers. • Within San Diego County, there are RECAPs (Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty) scattered in small sections of Escondido,El Cajon,La Mesa,Lemon Grove,National City, and Chula Vista. Larger RECAP clusters can be seen in the central/s o�uthern portion of the City of San Diego. Timeframe ct i��, V) 4--� 0 -75 V) r, 7� M tc to U 0 UO 0 U coo Recommendations -0 d M U 4_� r4 6t� V-4 0 U U Diversify and expand the housing As part of the 6th Cycle Housing Element update, evaluate the community's stock to accommodate the varied varied housing needs and adjust housing and land use policies to housing needs of different groups. accommodate the community's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA),by April 15,20�21 Promote equal access to, information for all residents. Update LEP plan to reflect Periodically but at least when new Census data becomes available demographic changes in community per Executive Order 13166 of August 11,2000. 1 6: 11,:,1 200 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 431 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"[`S'� u-n-s dl,c u- e c W p iff-C "'It )1,,)edi,_i,,,i�'ie 'its The following is a list of actions that will be taken to address j uris diction-specific impediments carried over from previous Als. Impediments and recommended actions are modified to reflect current conditions, feasibility, and past efforts. 10 Public Policies Imi3ediments:Various land use policies,zoning provisions,and development regulations may affect the range of housing choice available. • Recent Changes to Density Bonus Law: The most recent changes to California density bonus law went into effect in January 2020. Because of this, while most San Diego County jurisdictions do include regulations allowing for density bonuses, jurisdictions must review their regulations to ensure continued compliance with state law. • Definition of Family: The zoning ordinance of Solana Beach contains a definition of family that may be considered discriminatory. 1 ' * dictions have not yet amended the ADU provisions to Accessory Dwelling Un"ts: Most)urls comply with the recent changes to State law (e.g., SB 13, AB 68, AB 8,81, AB 587, and AB 671). Emergency Shelters: The City of Poway does not have adequate provisions for emergency shelters in their zoning ordinance. The currently adopted Housing Element for Poway acknowledges the need to update the zoning ordinance, but no amendment has been completed at this time. Furthermore,recent changes to State law (AB 101 and AB 139) require additional revisions to local zoning regulations regarding the provision of Lo�w Barrier Navigation Centers (LBNC) and emergency shelters. Specifically AB 139 requires,the assessment of shelter needs be based on the most recent Point-in-Time Count and the parking standards for shelters be based on staffing levels. Transitional and Supportive Housing: The County of San D�iego, La Mesa, and Vista do not fully comply with all of the requirements of SB 2. Furthermore, recent changes to State law AB 139 requires supportive housing to be permitted by right where multi-family and mixed uses are permitted. urisdictions should revise the zoning ordinance to specifically state J C? supportive housing as a by-right use. Farmworker Housing/Employee Housing: Some jurisdictions allow employee housing for six or fewer employees but have not,updated their zoning ordinance to permit the 'use in accordance with the California Housing Act. S1�,,11 P 1, 1"" 6: 201 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 432 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL XVP,,�A-1 Y S1 S 0 1"UPId P N4 E F"F'S'� Zoning Amendments Needed tj� U Recommended 4-4 V) r4 .4 bj� ct �j U U DO r ct bj� li:� Actions U U C) U C� �7� 0 0 U N Carlsbad Chula Vista �E Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas 0 0 Escondido 0 Imperial Beach E La Mesa 0 E Lemon Grove 0 E National City E E Oceanside E Poway E San Diego City 0 San Diego County 0 San Marcos 0 E Santee 0 Solana Beach E Vista E E E 0 1[1, S1�111 1 cill P ii,()i�",1, 1"', 6: 202 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 433 of 768 �p`UBLIC 0"UTREACH AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE S"DR,,A,FF"'H San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing na SIS, 0 M I nts to Is 10 9 air ousin 01C Hubl 'i*c Outreach Summary '1<epo March 11 1 2020 Prepared by MIG, Inc. At-,P i JA A-6 [,1 LJ B 1,[C"( A-1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 434 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Executive Summary The Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) covers the entirety of San Diego County, including 18 incorporated cities and the unincorporated County: City of Carlsbad 0 City of National City City of Chula Vista 0 City of Oceanside City of Coronado 0 City of Poway City of Del Mar 0 City of San Diego City of El Cajon 0 City of San Marcos City of Encinitas 0 City of Santee City of Escondido 0 City of So�lana Beach City of Imperial Beach 0 City of Vista City of La Mesa 0 Unincorporated County City of Lemon Grove 'The San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDRAFFH), comprised of representatives from the participating jurisdictions listed above, Fair Housing professionals, and housing advocates conducted a comprehensive outreach process thro�ughout San Diego Co�unty to identify barriers to Fair Ho�using choice, as well as strategies to address those challenges. SDRAFFH enlisted the support of MIG, Inc. and VeronicaTam and Associates in conducting the outreach. Over 1,20�4 community members and service providers provided input through the online questionnaire, stakeholder interviews, and community workshops. The key findings from the public outreach and engagement process are summarized below. 0 Frequent,targets of discrimination include seniors, people with physical and/or mental disabilities, families with children, Section 8 recipients, undocumented immigrants, and non-,native English speakers. 0 The inadequate supply of housing in San Diego County impacts low-income households, large families, and ho,useho,lds of color. 0 Underreporting of discrimination occurs due to fear of retaliation, harassment, or deportation. 0 Finding and accessing information about what housing is available, services, programs, and Fair Housing laws and regulations can be difficult and confusing. 0 Language barriers, different dialects, and cultural differences can present challenges to building community awareness about Fair Housing. 0 There are often misconceptions and misunderstandings about application requirements, reasonable accommoclation requests, and the compl�ex Fa,ir Housing laws and terminology. 0 Community leaders and representatives should be utilized to disseminate information and resources on Fair Housing issues, rights, and services. A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 435 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS The SDRAFFH and service providers should go directly to the community and share 0 information at community events, libraries, community centers, churches, swap meets, schools, transit centers, and other places where people congregate, particularly those people with the greatest needs. The input and findings from the public participation activities will be incorporated into the development of the Al. The draft Al will be available for public review in Spring 20,201. A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: A-3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 436 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'DJ,`N1E� 19 Public Outreach Overview In accordance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) regulations, community recipients of Federal community development block grant funds must certify that they are affirmatively furthering fairness and equal opportunity in housing for individuals and groups protected by the federal Fair Housing Act of 1 9�68. To meet this obligation, jurisdictions that administer or directly receive federal funds from HUD are req�uired to perform an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) as part of their consolidated planning process for housing and community development programs. The Al covers the entirely of San Diego county, including the 18 incorporated cities and all unincorporated areas: 0 City of Carlsbad 0 City of National City 0 City of Ch�ul�a Vista 0 City of Oceanside 0 City of Coronado 0 City of Poway 0 City of Del Mar 0 City of San Diego 0 City of El Cajon 0 City of San Marcos 0 City of En�cin�itas 0 City of Santee 0 City of Escondido 0 City of Solana Beach 0 City of Imperial Beach 0 City of Vista 0 City of La Mesa 0 Unincorporated County 0 City of Lemon G�rove Olutreach is an essential compoinent of developing the Al. Engaging local communities and stakeholders is an effective approach to assessing the nature and extent of impediments to Fair Housing. Community members affected by restrictions to Fair Housing choice have the right to share their concerns and participate in the decision-making process to mitigate and/or eliminate barriers to Fair Housing. The San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDRAFFH), comprised of representatives from the participating jurisdictions listed above, Fair Housing professionals, and housing advocates, in partnership with MIG, Inc. and Veronica Tam and Associates, facilitated a comprehensive outreach process throughout San Diego County to ensure a broad cross- section of residents, housing providers and professionals, interest groups, government agencies and community organizations participated in the Al development. Between October and No�vember 201191 MIG conclucted six community workshops and nine stakeho�ld�er interviews. Interpreters were available for events that were likely to d�raw Spanish and Ara bic-splea king stakeholders. Between October 2019 and February 2020, Veronica 'Tam and Associates conducted an o�nline survey to co�llect additio�nal public input. The online survey was available in English, Spanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, Tagalog, and Chinese. Print copies of the survey were available at community centers, libraries and civic buildings. 'The public events and online survey were promoted by the SDRAFFH with bilingual flyers, e-, blasts, website updates, and social media posts. Local news outlets also promoted the survey and community workshops. A 1?1?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-4, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 437 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS This report summarizes the key findings from the public engagement process regarding housing barriers, housing discrimination and Fair Housing priorities for San Diego County. A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 438 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 11. �Key Audiences and O�utreach Tools Th�e public engagement, program offered a wide ran�ge of opportun�ities for residents and stakeholders to share input to inform the Al development. The community outreach efforts were designed to collect feedback from community members representing a diversity of perspectives, interests and needs. At the outset of the outreach planning, MIG developed an Outreach Plan which described the activities that the SDRAFFH and consultant team would undertake to engage a diverse cross-section of the County and attract a wider audience to participate in the development of the Al. The Outreach Plan identified specific outreach goals, key stakeholders, outreach activities and preliminary messaging and notificatio�ns. As Outreach Goals Overall, the goal of the Outreach Program is to educate and engage key stakeholders and the public related to the Al process and outcomes. To do so, the outreach goals included: Develop an inclusive and expansive database of key stakeholders and interested parties to involve in the process. 0 Create and communicate clear, consistent and understandable explanations and messages about the purpose, process, and desired outcomes for the SDRAFFH and Al. 0 Engage key stakeholders and interest groups early in the process to: • Build interest in, commitment to and trust in the process. • Develop initial understandings of effectiveness of existing Fair Housing programs and services. • Identify issue areas or gaps in service, opportunities and constraints across the region and within specific communities; and • Extend outreach through their networks to hard-to-reach stakeholders. 0 Apply a diverse outreach toolkit of targeted communications and public participation activities that meet stakeholders' varying needs and ways of accessing information, and that best inform the technical process. 0 Identify stakeholders' needs and priorities for Fair Housing at the local and regional levels to effectively inform the Al. �Be �Key Stakeholders The SDRAFFH sought to engage a broad range of community members and geographies across the County. In particular, the outreach program emphasized targeted engagement of "hard-to-reachil populations such as seniors, youth, people with disabilities, limited-,English proficient communities, and low-, and moderate-income reside nts. 'These traditio�nally under- A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 439 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'DJ,`N1E� represented groups are typically more vulnerable to housing discrimination. The key audiences targeted during the outreach process are outlined below. San Diego County residents o Low-to Moderate Income Residents • Limited-English Proficient Residents • Seniors o Youth o Individuals with Disabilities 0 Elected officials 0 Executive staff from local jurisdictions and partner agencies 0 Fair Housing service providers 0 Developers /affordable housing developers(including mortgag�e lenders and affordable military housing developers) 0 Ho�using advocates 0 Disability advocates 0 M�inority advocates �Real estate industry Apartment management associations and representatives Legal aid Non-profit and social service providers Neighborhood organizations Faith based organizations Local universities and colleges A list of all stakeholder and service, provide,rs contacted is included in Appendix A. C. Outreach Tools Key stakeholders were targeted through a variety of outreach and engagement methods and tool�s. Th�e tools, used to raise awareness for the Al process and to promote the public input opportunities included: 0 Multilingual flyers 0 Multilingual e-blasts 0 Websites of SDRAFFH 0 Newsletters of SDRAFFH 0 Social media of SDRAFFH (Facebook, Twitter, NextDoor, etc.) 0 Facebook ads 0 N�ews media 0 Communications of civic and partner agencies Outreach efforts were designed to reach participants that are reflective of the demographics of the County including age, ethnicity, income and other characteristics. Th�e onl�ine survey and community workshops were publicized broadly using a variety of communication methods. A 1?1?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-7 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 440 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS An overview of the community outreach tools utilized in conducting the public participation process is presented on the following page (Table 1). A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-8 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 441 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS(Y'l-,IM P t' V "I'l I 11%1�[ 01C ,"D] 0 IF/U'R T101J1'1;1'a'NG C111 AIE� ]IS '1 0 111" Table 1: �P�ublic Outreach Tools 00 Outreo' ch, Correspo'noin "T'a' rg' e',t of Ou'treac'h Sor"'mia"r'y'6f'Re's'ponse,/Atten'id�anc'e Event(s) Flyers (Print Broad outreach to San Diego Community Print flyers were distributed at high-traffic community hubs to and Digital) County residents and Workshops & attract a broad audience. Print flyers were mailed to 621 stakeholders. Online Survey recipients including residents, elected officials, providers, Print flyers were mailed to advocacy organizations, non-profit and social service SDRAFFH stakeholder providers, and neighborhood organizations. mailing lists. Print flyers were distributed to, high- traffic centers such as libraries, community centers, and senior housing complexes. E-Blasts Mass emails to SDRAFFH Community Three E-blasts sent to 1,880 email list subscribers including stakeholder email lists. Workshops & residents, elected officials, providers, advocacy organizations, Online Survey non-profit and social service providers, and neighborhood organizations. Email blasts sent to additional participating jurisdiction and agency email list subscribers before each community workshop. Website Broad outreach to San Diego Community SDRAFFH posted information promoting the community Updates County residents and Workshops & workshops and online survey. The 19 participating stakeholders with computer Online Survey jurisclictions and partner agencies posted information and internet access. promoting community workshops and/or online survey on their jurisdiction's website. News Media Broad outreach to San Diego Community Article written in San Diego Union Tribune regarding the County residents. Workshops community workshops. News broadcast on KUSI News regarding the online survey. Article written in the Coast News Group regarding the North County community workshop. Announcement on KPBS (public radio channel) regarding the community workshops. Article written in Patch (community newspaper) regarding the North County community workshop. A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 442 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS(Y'l-,IM P t, V 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ,"D] 0 IF/U'R T101J111;1'a'NG C111 AIE� ]IS '1 0 111" NO Outreo' ch, Correspo'naiiin 'T'' r 4t df 0 'trea 'h S 0 rh'mia ry6f'Re's'p ons n ag U C e/Atte 'dante n Eve 't(s) Article written in the Patch regarding East County community workshop. News broadcast,on NBC Spanish language channel of a interview with the Mayor of National City regarding the South County Spanish-language worksho Social Media Broad outreach to San Diego Community Community workshop information, flyers, and survey links County residents and Workshops & posted to the 19 participating jurisdiction's social media stakeholders with computer Online Survey including Facebook, Twitter and Next Door. City of San Diego and internet access. Council M�ember Georgette Gomez, posted a,nnouncements on the community workshops and survey to her Facebook page. Facebook Broad outreach to San Diego Online Survey Facebook ads promoting online survey links were seen by Ads County residents and 31,'418 people at least once. stakeholders with computer and internet access. Outreach Broad outreach to San Diego On-going Fair Interactive bilingual (English & Spanish) display boards and Toolkit County residents and Housing handouts providing an overview of Fair Housing laws were stakeholders at community Educational developed to be utilized by SDRAFFH at future community events, public meetings, Outreach & meetings, public workshops, and other events to build pop-up outreach events, etc. Online Survey awareness about Fair Housing laws and services. A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-10 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 443 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 111. �Public Input Opportunities and Activities A key priority for the public engagement was to make participation easy and accessible. Outreach activities included an online survey, stakeholder interviews, and community workshops. Each of the activities are described in detail in the sections that follow. Table 4 summarizes the public input opportunities and activities on Page 13. A* Online Survey Veronica Tam and Associates launched an online survey to collect input from residents and stakeholders on Fair Housing and discrimination in October 2019. The survey remained open for approximately six months until February 1�4, 20,201, collecting a total of 1,13,2 responses as follows: Table 2: Online Survey �Results Jig �N[410WON" English 11089 Spanish 35 Arabic 3 Vietnamese 3 Tagalog 2 Chinese 0 Tota 1 11132 The online survey provided stakeholders who might not participate in a traditional workshop event with an opportunity to share their concerns, experiences and needs on their own time. The survey wa,s promoted by the SDRAFFH through multi-lingual flyers, e-blasts, website updates, news media, Facebook ads and social media posts. The survey was also, printed and distributed at community centers, libraries and civic buildings. 'The online survey questions are available in Appendix B. �Be Stakeholder Interviews In November and December 20,19, MIG conducted interviews with key housing and community stakeholders to gather their insights into holusing barriers, housing discrimination and Fair Housing priorities in San Diego County. A representative from each of the following nine organizations participated in a telephone interview: Table 3: Stakeholder Interviews 'Or''ganizatilow- ,' ' Stakeholde'rNa Me' and Title'— 1. Alliance for Regional Solutions Mary Lynn McCorkle, Collaborations Manager CSA San Diego Estela De Los Rios, Executive Director A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-11 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 444 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS I Orgahtzatiion' I Nameand Title 3. Elder Help San Diego Robin Strickland, Housing Services Coordinator 4. La Maestra Community Health Centers John Kuek, Director of Integrated Community Services 5. Legal Aia ,t)ociety of San Diego Coun Rosalina S encer, Lead Lawyer 6. National Alliance on Mental Illness Aaron Basila, Community Outreach Worker 7. Regional Task Force on the Homeless Jennifer Yost, Director of Grants Management 8. San Diego Housing Federation Laura Nunn, Director of Policy and Programs 9. Southern California Rental Housing Molly Kirkland, Director of Public Affairs Association Interview questions focused on: • The agency's role in Fair Housing; • Challenges,to building community awareness; 0 Misconceptions and misunderstandings about Fair Housing; • Ch�al�lenges to their agency in meeting Fair Housing needs; Protected classes who are well-served vs. under-served; Existing community assets for Fair Housing; and Improvements to in�ter-agency col�laboration Interviewees were assured that their responses would be summarized only in aggregate, and therefore were encouraged to speak freely. A full summary of th�e Stakeholder Interview discussion is available in Appendix C. co Communitly Workshops Six community workshops were held in communities throughout the County in October and November 2019 to inform community members about Fair Housing issues, to gather input on housing needs, barriers, and priorities. Community workshops were publicized using multi- lingual flyers, e-blasts, websites updates, direct emails, and news and social media. The interactive workshop format included brief presentations to describe Fair Housing and protected classes, as well as a description of the Al purpose and development process. Next, workshop attendees participated in a large group discussion regarding Fair Housing barriers and issues facing protected classes in San Diego County. Bilingual interpreters and staff assisted with workshop facilitation in areas that were likely to attract Spanish and Arabic speaking residents. Approximately 63 individuals attended the community workshops. The locations and dates of the meetings were as follows: A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-12 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 445 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Table 4: Community Workshops ca ion, I Date I Are,a of'Cou'h' Lo' t"' 1. Central Region LISC San Diego, San Diego, CA October 30, 2019 2. Eastern Region El Cajon Police Department, El Cajon, November 6, 2019 CA 3. Northern Region Escondido City Hall, Escondido, CA November 7, 2019 4. Central Region Valencia Park/Malcolm X Library November 13, 2019 5. Southern Region Chula Vista City Hall, Chula Vista, CA November 20, 2019 6. Southern Region MLK Jr. Community Center, National November 21, 2019 1 Cityl CA I The full summary of the discussion, questions and the wall graphics summarizing input from the community workshops are available in Appendix D. 0 Table 5: Overview of Public Engagement Activities U su,MM, ary o E,n9agemen' It rget of Sti'm Mary of f Activity, Outreach',,, Activity, Attehda''n'ce/Res'ponses, Online Survey Broad outreach to Collected 1 1 132 survey responses San Diego County community input on were submitted online. residential and their experiences stakeholders. with housing discrimination issues and concerns. Stakeholder Key housing and In-depth Nine stakeholder Interviews community conversations to interviews between stakeholders. gather insights into November and housing barriers, December 2019. housing discrimination and Fair Housing priorities across San Diego County. Community Broad outreach to Informed and Six community Workshops San Diego County educated residents workshops between residents and on Fair Housing October and November stakeholders. laws; collected 20119 with a total of input on Fair approximately 63 Housing needs and attendees. disparities of access; promoted online survey. A 1?1?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-13 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 446 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0 0 111. �Key Findings by Outreach Activity 'a A* Stakeholder Interviews The participant input and ideas shared during the stakeholder interviews are summarized below. The full list of discussion questions and responses is available in Appendix C. 1. Greatest Challenges to Building Community Awareness 0 Keeping up with updates to laws and regulations 0 Identifying commun�ity partners to share information with and provide training 0 Resistance to change by homeowners 0 Language barriers 2. Barriers to Housing in Community 0 Large and diverse geographic area 0 Language barriers and different dialects 0 Housing affordability im�placts and low vacancy rate 0 Difficulty finding a place to live with Section 8 voucher 0 Access to technology 0 Limited hours and transportation route options 9 Lack of awareness about services and resources 0 M�iscommunications between l�andl�ords and tenants, and tenants and service providers 0 Individuals with mental and physical disabilities have difficulty finding housing Large families have difficulty finding housing Poor qu,ality of housing and landlords that want improve un�its, 3. Misconceptions or Misunderstandings about Fair Housing Difficult or complex laws and requ,irem�e,nts, different requirements for different programs, and difficulty navigating process Not understanding role of different agencies or service providers 0 Terminology and different definitions, or understanding of terms like discrimination, affordable housing, intent, or eviction 0 Lack of understanding about different individu,als or people who are homeless, suffering from mental illness, live in permanent supportive housing 14. Greatest Challenges in Meeting Fair Housing Needs 0 Under reporting of discrimination until after the fact, or due to fear of retaliation, or the length of time to pursue legal action 0 It is difficult to fine the right information and staff at public agencies are overloaded with requests 0 Many homeless individuals don't have the right d�o�cumentatio�n to apply to programs 0 Section 8 waitlist is over 10 years long 0 Lack of housing affordability is causing people to leave California 0 NIMBYs and opposition to growth and siting of new housing 5. Protected Classes that Need Improved Services 0 Disabled individuals 0 Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer(LGBTQ) 0 Large families A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-14 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 447 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Tenants utilizing Section 8 vouchers 0 Seniors and aging populat,ion 9 Religious discrimination 0 Homeless individuals and families 6. Community Assets That Can be Leveraged to Further Fair Housing 0 Ban�ks can promote first time home b�uyin�g program 0 Community forums in North County 0 Community groups and ce�nters 0 Pop-up events at transit stations, or libraries where there is high foot traffic 0 Postings on Next Door 0 Utilizing 211 to help direct people to resources 0 Providing additional education and resources including a resource binder at housing service providers and trainings,targeted to landlords or property managers. 7. Possible Improvements to Inter-Agency Coordination 0 Ensuing that landlords are involved in the discussion 0 Reducing bureaucratic layers 0 SDRAFFH Fair Housing Conference can provide a venue to develop a shared understand�ing of challenges and implementation 0 Shift focus to thinking about why rules and regulations exist rather than checking boxes 0 Create a shared database of agencies and programs 0 Provide additional training opportunities and avenues for sharing information such as email blasts 0 Collaborate with non-profits to provide wrap around services and trainings 0 Have City Council and Board of Supervisors on boards of different organizations 8. Ways to Promote Outreach'for Al Workshops and Surveys 0 Provide notices and survey links to landlords and property owners, 0 Place advertisements on billboards, at transit stops, or at churches, stores, swap meets 0 Share information at community centers, religious facilities, and with community leaders 0 Partner with elected officials or city staff to disseminate information 0 Link promotion of Al to other related topics such as homelessness, 0 Send notification of workshops,to individuals, on Section 8 waitlist 9. Additional Comments 0 Recommend that landlords post evaluation criteria in advertisements 0 Need more housing and Fair Housing should be at the center of the discussion about the housing crisis. 0 Getting information out to tenants about Fair Housing rights and regulations is important 0 Supportive housing with other support services is important 0 Siting of permanent supportive housing should occur throughout the County within proximity to other services and amenities. A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"N",A: 1-11 t_� i,t 0 1�"1"131, 1',1 A-15 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 448 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 113. Community Workshops Findings The key findings from the six community workshops are summarized by key topic areas below. The full summary of discussion, questions and the wall graphics summarizing input from the community workshops are available in Appendix D. 1 0 Experiences with Housing Discrimination Individuals and families in the following protected classes shared experiences of housing discrimination: • Homeless • Sexual orientation • Individual with an emotional support animal • Family with deported fath�er • Women with adopted children o Famil�ies with children with autism o Source of income or type of work 2. Reporting of housing Discrimination Incidents 0 Burden of proof is on individual who has been discrimin�ated again�s,t 0 Costs and length of time for litigation are a deterrent for reporting incidents 0 Fear of retaliation�, harassme,nt, or deportation from reporting incidents 3. Barriers to, Hous,ing in Community 0 Many people have difficulty finding and accessing information about Fair Housing due to lack of access to computer/internet, knowing where to get the right information, cultural barriers, and lack of education in schools. 0 The information on what subsidies or options are available are confusing and the application process is confusing. 0 Many different languages and dialects. 0 The shortage of affordable units and long Section 8 waiting list. 0 Barriers are often layered 4. Protected Classes that Need Improved Services 0 Seniors 0 Individuals with mental and physical disabilities 0 Victims of domestic violence 0 Arbitrary facto�rs 0 Country of origin S. Misconceptions or Misunderstandings about,Fair Housing If prospective tenants have to pay for a background report for every application What qualified as a reasonable accommodation request 6. Ways to Build Community Awareness about Fair Housing Need to improve how information is provided to community members by relating messaging to people's lives, letting people know they will learn something, simplifying language and documents. Need to make sure that there are representatives at different agencies and providers that can communicate in different languages of local community. A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 449 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Go directly to communities to provide information at community gathering places, community centers, churches, schools, coll�eges, community and cultural events, senior housing complexes, and community meetings. Partner with organizations, cultural and faith-based groups, and organizatioins holding events to share information. Provide incentives and expand how information can be seen and heard. 17. Other Comments • There should be a universal rental application. • Should tap into 211 Commun�ity Information Exchan�ge to h�el�p share information. IV. Next Steps The SDRAFFH will incorporate the input and findings from the public participation activities into the development of the Al. The draft Al will be available for public review in Spring 20�2O�. A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 450 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Aw,ftpendilx A: Contacted Stakeholders and Service Providers p Across San Diego County C11 ily or,Group-,, Organiza ion,, I Typeof'Fla'ffit AmCal Housing Chelsea Investment Corporation �Lennar Homes Mercy Housing Baldwin & Sons North Coast Housing Wakeland Housing S,hea Homes KB Homes �Lennar Homes Bridge Housing Affordable Housing & �Market- Townspeople Rate, Housing Developers Lincoln Military Housing Affirmed Housing CityMark Development New Urban West Development S,un Country Builders Wermers Properties �Hitzke �Development Melia Homes City Mark �Development DGMUS Development Corp. Hallmark Communities AMCAL Multi-Housing Inc. Jamboree Housing Corp. Affordable Housing Advocates International Rescue Committee Boulevard Community Planning Group Family Health Centers of San Diego Rebuilding Together San Diego Habitat for Humanity �PAS�ACAT- Philippine Performing Arts Company MAAC Project Community Organizations & Burn Institute Non-Profits Somali Family Service of San �Diego Mama's Kitchen South Bay Community Services International Community Foundation Think Dignity S,upport the �Enlisted Project Chicano Federation San �Diego Youth Services �Paving Great Futures A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 451 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'D1,`N1E� Fa," 1d,r,.Gr'0UP_' Organ' ization, I I It 'y a San Diego, �LGBT Community Center Keys for Homes �Local Initiatives Supiport Corporation �Boys and Girls Club of Inland North County Alma Community Care Pacific �Beach Street Guardians Meals on Wheels Junior League of San Diego �Bayside Community Center Solutions for Change Council of Philippine American Organizations of San Diego County, Inc. Community Youth Athletic Center S,pace for Art City Heights Community Development Corporation Casa Familiar, Inc&Casa Quinta Launching Legacies San Diego Second Chance Program Environmental �Health Coalition Covelop San Diego American Indian Health Center The �Brain Observatory �Kabataan (Youth)Violence Prevention and Leadership Development �North County Lifeline GRID Alternatives San Diego �Los Ninos Ocean Discovery Institute Alliance for African Assistance, San Diego Pro Arte Voices Operation S,amahan, Inc. Centro cle Salud cle la Comuniclad cle San Ysidro, Inc. Voices for Children Urban Growth Paving Great Futures Trammel Crow Residential Salvation Army Camp Fire Boys and Girls East County Homeless Children's Association Olivewood Gardens and Learning Center Community Youth Athletic Club Wave Academy Launching Legacies Accion San Diego CSA San Diego Creative Flow Arts & Entertainment Organizations in Training A 1?1?E r"111111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-19 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 452 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Fa," 1d,r,.Gr'0UP_' Organ' ization, I I It 'y a International Survivors of Torture San Ysidro Health Center Neighborhood House Association Community Housing Works The Rosie Network Join the Journey Home Start, Inc. Harmonium, Inc. The Fair Housing Council of San Diego Rotary Club Kitchens,for Good Groundswell Community Project Community Food Bank of National City Center for Employment Opportunities Workshop for Warriors Access Youth Academy Creative Flow Arts & �Entertainment Lions Club Trauma Intervention Programs of San Diego Home Start, Inc. Somali Bantu Association of America San Diego Housing Federation Serving Seniors Focal Point Foundation United Way County Mental Health Valley Center Community Planning Group Challenge Center Corporation for Supportive, Housing Communities Againts, Substance Abuse Stepping Stone San Diego Vietnam Veterans of San Diego Children's Center for Child Protection Center for Community Solutions Chaldean & Middle �Eastern Social Services Alliance for Regional Solutions Bread of Life Rescue Missions, Century Housing Corporation Encinitas Lions Club �Encinitas Rotary Club San Dieguito Alliance S,elf Realization Fellowship Brain Injured Veterans Association (Biva) Bread Of Life Winter Rescue Mission Care For The Homeless Project Caring Residents Of Carlsbad A 1?1?E r"111111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-20 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 453 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Fa," ly 1d,r,.Gr,0U,P_, Organ' ization, I I It 'y a Community Interface Services Community Resource Center Elder Help Family Recovery Center Feeding America San Diego Vista Community Clinic Vista Las Flores(San Diego Interfaith Housing Foundation) Wounded Warriors �Homes �Inc. Operation HO�PE Vista �El Cajon Valley Lions Club Kiwanis Club of El Cajon Valley Access to Independence of North County Legally Blind Social Club Campesinos Unidos, Inc. Chicano Federation Deaf Community Services of San Diego, �Inc. Escondido Family Services Salvation Army Fellowship Center Fraternity House Mental Health Systems, Inc. �National Foundation of the Blind of Calif. Neighborhood House Association San Diego County Council on Aging, Inc. �Palomar Family YMCA Vista Community Clinic Neighborhood Healthcare Neighborhood House Association Springboard CDF1 People Assisting the Homeless(PATH) �LA- Mas Im Am �My �Brother's �Keeper CDC National Community Renaissance �New Americans Museurn The Arc of San Diego Fair Housing -The Center for Social Advocacy American Red Cross El Cajon Collaborative At Your Home Services Human Resources and Development Alzhiemer's Family Center League of Women Voters El Cajon Women I s Club �Home of Guiding Hands Crisis House Feeding San Diego 211 San Diego Access to Independence A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-21 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 454 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C ,Ais�iALYSIS Fa," ly 1d,r,.Gr,0U,P_, Organ' ization, It 'y a The Rose House, Harmonium, Inc. �FRC & National City Collaborative San Diego Workforce Partnership San Diego Fuller Center for Housing �La Maestra Valley Center Community Planning Group The Horn of Africa Community Regional Task Force on the Homeless, Alpha Project Father Joe's Villages �LaunchBio, Inc. Barrio Logan College Institute Southwestern Community College National School District Sweetwater High School UC&D El Cajon Valley High Carlsbad Unified School District Educational Institutions Oceanside Unified School District Escondido �Education Compact Escondido Elementary School District Escondido Unified Schools Escondido Union �High School Escondido Union High School District Wesley House Student Residence, Inc. a on Valley School District San Diego Continuing �Education Foundation STS, Constantine & Helen Greek Oirthodox Church �Episcopal Community Services STS Constantine & Helen Green Orthodox Church Skyline Church Jewish Family Service of San Diego St. Paul's Senior Services Lutheran Social Services Lutheran Social Services of Southern California Faith Based Organization Urban Live Ministries, Inc. San Diego Interfaith Housing Foundation Interfaith Community Services Family Focus Christian Counselling Christian Science Churches Church of Christ �Pacific View Babtist Church Ranch View Babtist Church San Dieguito United �Methodist Church Seacoast Community Church A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"N",A: 1-11 A-22 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 455 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C ,Ais�iALYSIS Fa," ly 1d,r,.Gr,0U,P_, Organ' ization, It ,Y a Seaside Presbyterian Church S,t Andrew's Episcopal Church St John's Catholic Church St Mark Lutheran Church Carlsbad Community Church Catholic Charities Diocese Of San Diego Daybreak Community Church S,tAnne'S �Episcopal Church St Patrick'S, Catholic Church Interfaith Shelter Network Chula Vista Fire Department National City Library Santa Clara Valley Water District Public Agencies San Diego, �Housing Commission City of El Cajon Police Department North County Transit District El Cajon Firefighers Trinity Housing San Diego Imperial Counties Labor Council �Logan Heights Community Development Corporation Olpportune Companies Downtown Encinitas Mainstreet Association Willow Partners- Plaza City Apartments TELACU Residential Management G reysta r San Diego Electrical Training Trust Farmers Bureau Shopoff Realty Investments C& C Mentor Protege' Program �DCM Properties �Realtor, Property �ManagemenL �Related California - Paradise Creek �Management Staff & Business Organizations Zephyr Partners San Diego,Volunteer Lawyer Program Apitm Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Sunshine Apartments S,olari Enterprises Travelers Aid Society of San Diego Thomas Strafford Investments �Harrison Properties SGPA Architecture and Planning Building Industry Association San Diego and Imperial SDDC Regional Network Accretive Investment Inc. Avanath Capital Management AAA Management, LLC. San Diego, County Building and Construction Trades Council A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-23 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 456 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Fa," ly 1d,r,.Gr,0U,P_, Orgahization, I I It 'y a RMG Properties Nolan Communities �Norwood Development Strategies �Residential Management Support System El Cajon Chamber of Commerce �Equity Residential San �Diego Home Loan Counseling Services �Encinitas Chamber of Commerce Camp Pendleton Quantico Housing (Lincoln Military Housing) �Deluz Family Housing A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-24, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 457 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Appendix B: Online Surveys Housing Discrimination Survey SDRAFFH The Sa n Diego Regional All iiain Ce for Fa i r Housi ng is conducting t,,,h I s su rvey on beha If of a]I the paMci pating,citles in'the 'Sa n Diego,regiop,incl ud Ing um neorpora ted,porti ns,of Sa n Dieg Colun 10 1 '0 We,want to bear about your experience with housing discrimination issues and', concerns. Please fill out the foll'o,wirig,survey. The survey is being conducted anonymously,so pit,ase be honest,and detalled.in your answers. Responses are anonymous and will 4esummarized andindividual responses will not bereporWid,in any,�way. Thank yG uj I Federala nd State Fair Homsinig W,ws,prob hk d'crim[mation M all a spects o�f housling,including hame sa e bousintg poj*kies is I I I' s,te at@ 6 andifinancing'. Each resident is entitled to,equal accass to housing opportunities re�gardless of race.,color,religion,sex,hationial Origin, diso'bility/m ed,ic;Rl familio I:�tatm"-,s"o ma rlt4l StAwtmso,41ge,a live'AFY, -sex omi o�rie ntatio n,gqoi4er idliemity,,ge nder, i ex press to n,sou rce of into nia,or a ny ot her ar�itrarVroason,, [)o YOU r pabde in a,C[fy OF an urimcorporateci area of,San Diegio Ccminty? 04yof. ot unincorporated County"commi,nity, Have��q pers�onafly ever eq:kerfence,�d discrim'inabon In hOUS11101g�? YES NO Of You answered"'YES"p)Pa_se an�svver que.-stions, 43-45 If youanswtered"NO PIP-ase proceed to question If YOU believe YUU 118i'Ve l)een,cljst,,,hmJriat�ed,agairist Landlorld/Ptoperly Manager Real Estate Agent. InswanGe Bfoker/Company Mortgage lender, GoVernmeimit,Statf Persoin :X,,her b) M-Pere did the act of d!sc;,rmJna1"ion occur?(bheol(all thal app,�y) —Apartmerit Cornplex CondorTownhome Other Development _,S`j,rjg1P,Fa,m0y Neighborhood public or,So Ho using Pf oJect Mobjl�ehome Park When Applying for CitylCounty Progiosi'li,,s a), 0o Mizat ba,,,sis do you believe you were discrl'dniinated agaimt?(check,all lbal appl, Y) Race Color, Re I iglor', Natio' nal Origin Ancestry Gen�J-er Ma6tal b3tatUSS Nq e FaMily Sflaftf$, Source-of Income DIsabil ity)"Med ita 1,C-ainditions, single-parenl,Wfii ci*014ren, Ullo?,r,�-nplaytnemt (&Ither�,you orsomeone c1losse Wyau,) fiLitnily votti children or-e�xpectjng a insurapice,H,ousing 011140 ClioibelSectior)8'VouctneO —CAher(please explain),,, d) How,were yot.j disofiminat.�im,,ldagain,st?(!chrck all rhotap#yj Not'Shown Apartment Higher,Rent Otter —.1-49her,Security Cileposil, Provided Differertt Housing 5ervilces w, Facilibes Delayed Repairs or RePairs, Service/Support,Anirr,i,,,al �Iot M ade Deposit Charged A I?I?E r111111111il D 1"N',A: 1-1 i_� 1,1, 0 1 "1"131k A-25 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 458 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'1)J,`N1E� 4. Reasonable modifications and reasonable accommodations allow for certain changes or flexibility in the rules, policies, or procedures set by housing providers.This allows a resident with a disability an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a housing unit. A reasonable modification is a structural change made to the premises while a reasonable accommodation is a change,exception or adjustment to a rule, policy, practice or service. For example, installing a ramp for an individual who uses a wheelchair or grab bars in the bathroom are reasonable modifications.A reasonable accommodation would include making an exception to an existing'no pet'rule to permit a service dog. Have you ever been denied a-. —"Reasonable Modification" "Reasonable Accommodation" (check all that appiy) N/A a) If YES,what was your request? 5. If you believe you have been discriminated against, have you reported the incident? YES NO a) If NO–Why? Don't Know Where to Report Afraid of Retaliation Other Don't Believe it Makes Any Difference Too Much Trouble b) If YES, how did you report the incident? c) If you reported the complaint,what is the status? Unresolved Unresolved, Pending Resolution —Other Resolved via Mediation In Litigation 6. A hate crime is a criminal act or attempted criminal act against an individual or group of individuals because of their actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin,ancestry, gender, marital status,sexual orientation, age,family status,source of income or disability. Are you aware of a hate crime having been committed in your neighborhood? YES NO a) If YES, in what city did the hate crime occur? b) What was the basis?(check all that apply) Race Color Religion National Origin Ancestry Gender Marital Status Sexual Orientation Age Family Status Source of Income Disability/Medical Conditions Other(please elaborate)-. 2 A I?I?E r111111111il D 1"N',A: 1-1 i_� i,t 0 1 "1"131k A-26 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 459 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01(� Ais�i,ALYSJIS 7., Have you ever attended a Fair Housing Tralni�nq? YE8 f"4101 ,a), If YES,was it free or,was there a fee'7 R ee Required a Fee, b) If YES,where was[he trainirg? Home Work" Dt of Other 8. Have you ever,seeri, or,hea r�d a Fa4r Housirig Public Service,Anirict�ncement on T'VYjRa,d,i'o,,/O�nl�ine",!'�' YES NO, 9'. *)w did'you Ouest i'o n s 101-15 we o ptio n al 14,howevef,your response W01 allow us to better serve the co�mmunity.Yo�ur individuaJ response wi,11 be confidentiial,, 110., MIhnic Categorles(,select,,only onq) Hispanic ur Latino, Not-Hispan1r.,or L'atino 11. Rac i a!Categories(:�selecf,only,one) White Arnericaii fi-dian/Allaskap Nafive&VVhJte, Bla,ck/Afric,an Amerizan Americ,an IridonlIALaskan Native&BlacklAfhcan Arneo'can Asian Asian&'Vvh(te, I -i&White Arneric-an lbdlarilMas,ka�n N,aflVe., Mackffifricafn�,Amerlcar Native,Hlawaiiar/Other P�acjfic Islander Other Multi-Racial 121. Do you renl,or,own your home'?" Re nt, Own, 131q, Age', 18-24 25-34 35-44 45,-5 4 55-64, 65-1- '14.. Do yQl-,j,have a disabJ1Ay?,(0�,t7,1e or�e) YES NO 151!1.1 C�o,youha�te ch�ildren o,nder the ageof 1 Byears old i�ii your honie?(cirrie.,rvie) YB95: NO, THIS SU'R,VF.,Y 15 ALSO AVAILABLE MUM AT. 'e,L" fK �,(,,21tpZrL 5, 2LLq��L 5"�,�/ ni,�,on,,k, Fo0,H'oU 5 Orsca n the QR code,below with,your phone camera to rHANX YOUI open,thesurvey onfine. Please return surveys to: Rl 0 Alexis bueno Correa 107 S.Fair,0ak%Av1e(iue,,Su,.j1e 212, Pasadenaf CA 911,05 Th,esarvey will also be avaiiable',in, �panl,`O, Vietnamese, Tbgclog,kwbic,&0finese. Coritoct yotH iocol Oty o�r ju��fscjictio'o to obtai'f?01 1 3 A I?I?E r111111111il D 1"N',A: 1-1 i_� 0 1�"I"131k A-27 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 460 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'D1,`N1E� Appendix C: Summary of Stakeholder Interviews Format: In November and December 2011191 M�IG conducted nine interviews with key ho�using and community stakeholders to gather their insights into holusing barriers, housing discrimination and Fair Housing priorities in San Diego County. Project team members engaged key stakeholders who responded to requests for one-on-one interviews about the Al. Participants represented organizations that provide Fair Housing services, and or complementary and related support services. A list of the nine stakeholders interviewed is included below: Organization Stikeholder Name and Title 1. Alliance for Regioinal Sollutions Mary Lynn McCorkle, Collaborations Manager 2. CSA San Diego Estela De Los Rios, Executive Director 3. Elder Help San Diego Robin Strickland, Housing Services Coordinator 4. La Maestra Community Health Centers John Kuek, Director of Integrated Community Services 5. Legal Aid Society of San Diego County Rosalina Spencer, Lead Lawyer 6. National Alliance on Mental Illness Aaron Basila, Community Outreach Worker 7. Regional Task Force on the Homeless Jennifer Yost, Director of Grants Management 8. San Diego Housing Federation Laura Nunn, Director of Policy and Programs 9. Southern California Rental Housing Molly Kirkland, Director of Public Affairs Association Each interview subject was asked nine questions. They were assured that their responses would be summarized only in aggregate, and therefore were encouraged to speak freely. Summary of Discussion: The following is a summary of major ideas, thoughts, and themes that emerged from these interviews, organized by question. 1. Briefly describe your agency's ro1e in addressing Fair Housing needs in the region.What geographic area and mix of clients do you serve.? The Alliance for Regional Solutions (Alliance) is a collaboration of over 70 non-profit organizations, eight North County cities (Carlsbad, Oceanside, Poway, San Marcos, Vista, Escondido, Encinitas, and Solana Beach), and the County of San Diego. The Alliance includes five collaborative working groups: Bridge to Housing Committee, North County Food Policy Council, North County Case Manager's Network, North A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-28 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 461 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'DJ,`N1E� County Works, and Senior Action Alliance. The Alliance partner agencies serve clients living in poverty or homelessness, and low-income individuals and families. CSA San Diego County is a Fair Housing provider that offers a variety of services including educational Fair Housing seminars for tenants and landlords; Fair Housing counseling and dispute mediation; services to tenants, landlords, and apartment managers; and rental practice discrimination audits or testing. They also ensure protection under Fair Housing laws that address discrimination and harassment and provide assistance in handling Fair Housing disputes including filing complaints with the Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). Elder Help provides residential services to low income tax credit buildings for residents aged 55 and up. Elder Help also provides housing consultations to individuals aged 6,0 and up who are experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity to help connect them to resources. In addition, Elder Help oversees the HomeShare program, a roommate matching program, that connects people of all ages who want to share a private home, apartment, condo, or manufactured home in San Diego, Carlsbad and Poway. La Maestra Community Health Centers have provided specialty services including behavioral and mental health, chronic disease management, and essential support services to San Diego's most culturally diverse and lowest income communities since 1997. Sites are provided in City Heights, El Cajon, National City, Lemon Grove, and at three school-based sites in San Ysidro; serving communities that are home to recently settled refugees and immigrants from more than 60 countries. In addition to health services, La Maestra provides housing assistance support and help to educate tenants and landlords about Fair Housing rights. Legal Aid San Diego receives funding from HUD, and from the Community Development �Block Grant Program (CBDG), which is tied to specific cities in the region. As part of their HUD funding, Legal Aid offers free help to eligible persons who have questions or problems with Section 8, tax credit or other public housing; provides Fair Housing services in the City and County of San Diego at their Fair Housing Center; and conducts systematic audit testing of different protective classes every year. As part of their CBDG funding, Legal Aid provides testing, intake and enforcement of Federal and State Fair Housing Laws for the County of San Diego, City of San Diego, Escondido, San Marcos, Vista, Oceanside, Encinitas, and Carlsbad. The Regional Task Force on the Homeless merged with the Regional Continuum of Care (COC), a consortium of representatives tasked with strategic planning and coordination of resources with the collective goal of ending homelessness in the San Diego regio�n. The Task Force administers the Homeless Management Information System to capture and report on client, project, and system level information regarding homeless services; oversees the Coordinated Entry System (CES), a list of A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-29 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 462 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'DJ,`N1E� all people in the region experiencing homelessness to be referred to available housing inventory; and works with service providers to ensure that receive appropriate training and education throughout the year. The National Alliance on Mental Illness(NAMI) operates the Connection 2 Community Clubhouse, which serves as a referral center to help San Diegans deal with homelessness by connecting them with various services from employment training to housing. The San Diego Housing Federation advocates for those with very low incomes who are most severely impacted by the absence of an adequate supply of affordable housing in the San �Diego region. The Federation also offers professional training for residential support network, supportive housing learning network, and members; and partners with the SDRAFF'H to host a Fair Housing Conference annually. The Southern California Rental Housing Association is a trade association that provide education and advocacy to individuals and companies who own, manage, or provide services to the rental housing industry throughout San Diego County, Southern Riverside County, and Imperial County. They offer educational opportunities on Fair Housing throlughout the year including quarterly classes, continuing education opportunities, Fair Housing Light for independent rental owners, and are an affiliate of the National Apartment Association, which provides online trainings. 2. Overall,what do you find to be the greatest challenges to building community awareness about Fair Housing in your communities? Keeping up with the changes to laws and regulations related to protected classes, court opinions, etc. and then ensuring that owners and property managers are well informed. Many homeowners don't want to see change in their communities and elected officials side with homeowners in this respect. 0 Language barriers are a challenge because tenants cannot communication with their landlords or property managers to make requests. 0 Seniors and individuals with hearing impairments also have difficulty in communicating with landlords or service providers. 0 Not having a shared common language about housing issues or housing terminology(ex. H�UD definition vs. clefinitions of perman�en�t s,upportive housing). 0 Housing in�stab�ility cau,sed by ten�an�ts not having a clear understandin�g of different housing program requ,ireme,nts (ex. Sponsor based vouchers have diffe,rent requirements than project-b�ase,d vouchers), or where to look for housing programs or services. Identifying community partners and organizations to share information with and provide trainings to so Fair Housing information gets disseminated to the people that need it most. A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-30 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 463 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Apathy from community at large to address Fair Housing issues. Narrow l�ack of understanding of Fair Housing and the broader impl�ications at the community level. 0 3. What are the most common barriers to housing you hear about in your service a re a.) Large and diverse geographic area. Language: • Language barriers and differences between dialects and translation needs make communication difficult. • Landlord would not wait for prospective tenant to get translator to review application documents and moved onto the next in line. Financial: • Providing security deposit of three months rent upfront. • Credit checks have little regulation and no standard rules for what is evaluated or what a tenant can expect. Housing Affordability: • More than 35�% of people living in shelters have a job and income but they still don't have the means to move into an affordable home. • Many seniors have social security income, but it is not enough to afford the high cost of rent in the region. • Lack of financial resources for large families and the shortage of apartments that are large enough to accommodate large families. Families cannot afford to rent a five-bedroom house, but landlords do not want to rent a three-bedroom apartment to a family of ten. • Tight rental market-Vacancy rate is very low so there isn't a lot of available housing. • Landlords can be selective with who they choose to rent to and often they are not following the Fair Housing rules. • O�ne of the lowest ratios of permanent supportive housing in the Country limits options. • Lack of regulatio�ns rent control regulations. • Difficulty of finding a pilace to live with a Section 8 voucher. • Technology: • M�any seniors or l�ow-income individuals do not h�ave access to a computer, library, or events. • Tech�nol�ogy or avenues for finding information are always evolving. • Transportation: o Limited hours and routes make it difficult for people to visit service providers or to use for finding available housing. • Awareness: �o M�any l�ow-income inclividuals and familiar are not aware of services. A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-31 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 464 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS o It can be difficult for people to find information on places that are available for rent as there is no centralized location or place to find housing. Miscommunications • Between landlords and prospective tenants. • Between tenants and service providers. Individuals with disabilities • Mental health issues, such as hording and anxiety can also make finding housing difficult. • Difficult to find hous,ing that is accessible for people with disabilities. Housing for Families: • Difficult to find housing for families with young children. • Landlords don't check for proof of income because they feel large families don't have the financial means or they are concerned that the children are going to damage the unit. Poor quality of housing o Landlords don't want to pay to fix up properties and tenants don't know their rights about what is required 4. What are greatest misconceptions or,misunderstandings'that you hear in your' service area?What do you think might be'the sources of misinformation.? 0 Difficult or complex laws, requirements, and programs: • The difference between Federal and State Fair Housing laws and regulations, especially if landlords or managers have operated in different parts of the county where the requirements vary. • Different jurisdictions have different requirements and waitlists for Section 8. • Misunderstandings about when they can apply and where they can apply. • Perception that some people are "skipping the linelf or being served out of order. • Many individuals are becoming housing insecure after they retire and are on a fixed income. They are trying to figure out how to navigate the process for the first time later in life. lo Confusing disability a,nd accommodation requirements incl�uding the difference between service animal�s and th�erapy or emotional support animals. o Assuming that compl�eting Housing Determination Survey(VSI-SPDAT) will lead to receiving free housing. �Role of different agencies or service providers: o Individuals thinking that Fair Housing providers can resolve all housing related issues including finding units to rent, finding affordable, housing units, providing subsidies for deposits or re,nt, etc. A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-32 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 465 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS o Don't understand the difference between HUD, the Housing Commission, or Housing Authority and how to navigate the different agencies. * Terminology: • The term "discrimination" can be defined differently between different people. • "Discrimination" is used as a catch-all term when discussing disputes between tenants and landlords; however, discrimination has a specific legal definition. • Definition of"affordable hous,ing" varies, in different regions. N Term "affordable" many still not be affordable to many individuals N Different programs define affordability in different ways. • "No bad intent" behind discrimination N Not meaning to discriminate is still discrimination if it violates federal or state laws • Not understanding what being evicted means. Many tenants believe they have been evicted because their landlord has asked them to leave, but they have not received eviction paperwork and they have no court record of eviction. 0 Othering of People: • Fear or lack of understanding about individuals that are homeless, suffering from mental illness, or multiple families residing in one home. • Misconception that homeless individuals want to live on the street. • Misconceptions that people in permanent supportive housing are different or scary. 0 Perception that civil rights act fixed Fair Housing and that housing discrimination is no longer occurring. 5. What are the greatest chaflenges for your agency in meeting Fair Housing needs? 0 Under Reporting of Discrimination. • Many tenants are not sharing experiences of discr,imination until after the fact. • People are not reporting discrimination due to fear of retaliation. • People don't take Fair Housing seriously until they have an issue with their landlord. In addition, often tenants want an immediate remedy and want to take their landlord to court immediately. However, once they realize the length for time it takes to pursue legal actio�n, they clon't pursue the compliant with HUD. Access to information: o It is difficult to find the right information on websites. A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-33 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 466 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'DJ,`N1E� o Staff at public agencies are overloaded with requests, which makes it difficult to reach staff to answer questions, to get on Section 8 waitlists, or to get extensions on Section 8 vouchers. Many homeless individuals do not even have the documentation (i.e. identification documents, birth certificate, Social Security Information)to apply to programs. The first step is getting required documentation before they can even apply and get on the waitlist. Section 8 Waitlist is over 10 years o Many families may increase their family size after getting their Section 8 voucher and want to stay in same place; however, many landlords want families to leave Housing Affordability: o Many families are leaving California due to the high cost of housing Not In My �Backyard (NIMBYism) and opposition to growth: • Presents, an added challenge to build new hous,ing • Siting of permanent supportive housing or shelters is difficult 6. Which protected classes' needs for Fair Housing in our region do you believe are relatively well served.9, Which protected classes have the greatest needs for impro�ved service, and why? 0 Relatively well served protected classes: • Veterans are relatively well served compared to some of the other protected classes. • Disabled tenants with physical disabilities are the most documented cases. 0 Have greatest needs: • Disabled tenants Lim�ited accessible housing options. Systematic separation of people with disabilities(m�ental illness, clevelopment disabilities, etc.) • Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer(LGBTQ,) are experiencing increasing discrimination. • Larg�e families especially related to the application of related to occupancy stanclard because land�lord�s are not applying inclustry standard of two people per bed�room plus one. • 'Tenants using Section 8 vouchers because the stanclards have recently changed. • Seniors and aging populatio�n Housing that accommoclates allowing them to age in place. Limited incomes mean seniors are often o�ne payment away from not being able to afford ho�using. • Religious discriminatio�n - East African community has faced discrimination based on religion, language, and race. o Homeless individuals and families A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-34 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 467 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'DJ,`N1E� IN Male couples are often separated. IN Single fathers have limited options. o Military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD) have special housing needs. 17. What community assets exist today that could be better leveraged in addressing Flair Housing? 0 Banks could be better leveraged to promote first home time buyer program. Fair Hous,ing also applies to for-s,ale units and loan lending and the practice of redlining. 0 North County elected officials hold community forums on specific topics such as housing and homelessness, could use these forums as a touchpoint with the community to share information on �Fair Housing or future workshops. 0 Utilize existing list serves from different non-profits to dissemination information and provide information at monthly or quarterly meetings hosted by different agencies, so information is shared on an on-going basis. 0 Established community groups and centers • Utilize community centers, religious facilities and leaders to provide access to communities and disseminate information (Ex. South Sudanese Community Center and Ethiopian Community Center) • Share information on social media pages and in different languages 0 Hold pop-up events at transit stations or libraries where there is already high foot traffic an visibility. 0 Post information on Next Door. 0 Utilizing 211 to help direct people to resources. 0 Additional educatio,n and resources: • Provide a resource binder with information on Fair Housing to help train staff and visitors to, no,n-profits, ho�using service providers, etc. • Provide trainings specifically targeted to landlords or property managers. • Landlords and property managers are often intimidated to go to trainings offered by Fair Housing service providers, so having a training offered by a government entity or non-profit that doesn't serve as a Fair Housing provider would be helpful. 80 What types olf improvements to inter-agency coordination could improve i-air Housing service in the region? 0 Landlords and property owners sometimes find themselves being taken advantage of when it comes to Fair Housing laws, for exampl�e wh�en it comes to emotional support a,nima,l�s. Fa,ir Housing law are intended to help both residents avoid discrimination and landlords avoid complaints. 0 Every jurisdiction h�as different pol�itical dynamics and processes, reducing bureaucratic layers and better organization could hel�p improve coordination. A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-35 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 468 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS • SDRAFFH Fair Housing Conference allows advocates and community groups to, be in the same space as City staffers, and other HUD implementers. Provides a venue to, develop a shared understanding of challenges and implementation. • Jurisdictions are subject to rules, regulations and requirements and the emphasis is on being compliant and checking boxes not on providing quality Fair Housing implementation. Focus need to shift to thinking about why the rules and regulations exist in the first place. Create a shared database of agencies and programs • Share information on what each agency does and the type of cases they take on • Provide information on program eligibility requirements, openings, or waitlist times. Training • Provide additional training opportunities and avenues for sharing information such as a tip of the week email blast that provides updates on new laws and regulations. • Collaborating with non-profits to provide wrap-around services and trainings. Improve diversity of service providers and bring in broader community to discuss, challenges and potential solutions. Having Council Members and Board of Supervisors, on boards of different organizations and non-profits can help facilitate conversations. 9. What are the best ways to promote and outreach for the Analysis of Impediments workshops and surveys? 0 Provide notices and survey links to landlord and property manager groups so they can distribute information in weekly email�s. 0 Place advertisements on Billboards or signage at Trolley station�s, or other areas where people congregate such as at churches, stores, swap meets. 0 Work with service providers, qualified health centers,, bridge shelters, family health centers. 0 Partner with elected officials or city staff to disseminate information on the Al. 0 Link promotion of the Al to other topics that people are interested in such as homelessness, or a specific project. 0 Look at reaching people where they congregate or seek out information such as at community fairs or through 2,11. 0 Send notification of workshops to all individuals on the Section 8 waitlist and or those receiving housing vouchers. 0 Share with community centers, religious facilities, and comm�unity leaders • Recognize cultural differences. • Find leader at each established community center or mosque and ask for guidance on how to best provide information to community-they will provide the opening for sharing information with the community. • Ask residents where they go for information. A 1?1?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 t_� i i,t 0 1�"1"13" 1"1 A-36 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 469 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 10.Do you have any additional comments or ideas related to the Al or the future of Fair Housing in the region? Recommend that landlords post their evaluation criteria in advertisements, so it is clear how they are evaluating prospective tenants. If tenants understand upfront what the criteria there were being reviewed against it could help them understand the qualifying process better. Housing Crisis • Need more housing. The lack of supply is leading to more Fair Housing issues,. Need to build more housing units to get out of the current hous,ing cris,is. • Fair Housing needs to be front and center in the housing crisis, discussion. Many people are not aware of reasonable accommodations, or other rights they have under �Fair Housing law. Getting information out to tenants, is important because many people only contact housing providers after the fact, or after they have moved out. It is better to try to intervene earlier. Supportive housing with other supportive services such as behavioral health and employment training is also important. The siting of permanent supportive housing should occur throughout the County along transportation lines, within proximity to other amenities such as mental health services, health care, grocery store, parks, and good school systems. Many individuals do not want to be located downtown in permanent supportive housing because they have experienced trauma in downtown and do not want to be retraumatized. A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-37 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 470 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'D1,`N1E� 0 0 Appendix D: Summary olf Community Workshop Discussion & Wall Graphics Format: In November and December 2011191 M�IG conclucted six community thro�ugho�ut the County to inform community members about Fair Housing issues, to gather input oin holusing needs, barriers, and priorities.The following pages summarize the key discussion points and display the wall graphics that were recorded at the six workshops. Approximately 63 individuals attended the community workshops. The locations and dates of the meetings were as follows: ca ion, Date Are,a of'Cou'h' Lo, t"' 1. Central Region LISC San Diego, San Diego, CA October 30, 2019 2. Eastern Region El Cajon Police Department, El Cajon, November 6, 2019 CA 3. Northern Region Escondido City Hall, Escondido, CA November 7, 2019 4. Central Region Valencia Park/Malcolm X Library November 13, 2019 5. Southern Region Chula Vista City Hall, Chula Vista, CA November 20, 2019 6. Southern Region MLK Jr. Community Center, National November 21, 2019 Cityl CA Summary of Discussion and Questions: 1. Have you (or someone you know)ever experienced housing discrimination? For what reason do you befieve you have been discriminated against?(e.g., age,, family, status, race,, etc..) Individual that was homeless for a period of time had difficultly accessing programs because they did not fit special categories (veteran, physically disabled)to qualify for assistance. Individual had difficultly getting an apartment due to, sexual orientatio,n. 0 Individual had to pay a larger deposit for an emotional support animal. 0 Individual's dad was deported, and the apartment rent was increased shortly after deportation. 0 Woman with adopted children had difficulty securing housing. 0 Families with children with autism experienced discrimination. 0 Individuals have experienced discrimination based on their source of income or the type of work they do. 2. If you believe yo�u"ve been discriminated against, have you reported'the 0 Went?Who d*d you report the incident tol Where did you go for help?What Incl I I a was your experience with the person/organization that helped you? 0 The burden of proof is on the person who has been discrim�inated against. 0 Costs and length of time for litigation related to pursing legal action are often a deterrent for reporting incidents. A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-38 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 471 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Parolee that was experiencing discrimination for having a criminal record did not report the incident because he was afraid of being reported to probatioln offi ce r. People are afraid of reporting incidents because fear of retaliation, harassment, or deportation. 3. What are the most common barriers to housing in your community? 0 Accessing Information • Many people have difficulty finding information about Fair Housing. Need to find a way to transfer information to those who need it most. • Everything is electron�ic, which can be difficult for people who do not have access to co computer or internet. • En�su,ring information is accurate and from the right sources is, important. • Advocacy is important. Need to know who can point you towards the right information. • Cultural differences in how information and resources can be provided to different communities. For example, can't be completely reliant on Iman to provide information to Muslim community. • There is a lack of education in school about laws and rights. There should be classes for high-school students to provide basic fundamentals. 0 Lack of transparency in process • It is unclear and confusing what the different options are. The type of voucher people may have received may not �be accepted widely at different comp,lexes. • The applicant process is confusing and application requirements vary from p,lace to p,lace. 0 Language • Many different languages and dialects can present translation challenges. • Some papers have housing ads in foreign languages, but housing is not posted anywhere else. For example, local Chinese papers that have rental listings but not posted elsewhere. So, in practice only Chinese speaking/reading people will see those ads and the landlord will only end up renting to people, who can read Chinese. 0 Availability and Affordability • Long Section 8 waiting list. • Low vacancy rate means fewer units available. • Shortage of housing units that are available for individuals or families making 25% of the Area Median Income (AMI). • Low-income individuals or families have a difficult time providing upfront deposits. 9 There is fear and anxiety associated with looking for place to live. Many peopl�e are desperate to find a place and it is out of their control. 9 Barriers are often layered: Race, gender, language, etc. A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-39 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 472 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 4. What protected classes have the greatest,needs for improved service, and why? Concern expressed that income-level should be a protected class. Stated that the requirement to provide two to three times the amount of rent upfront presents affordability challenges and difficulty in securing ho�using. 0 Seniors • There is not enough housing for seniors. They often face un�ique challenges related to physical ailments, mental capacity, lack of advocates, and are vulnerable to people taking advantage of them. • Land lords don't want to rent to se,niors d u,e to conce,rn�s about hordin�g, mental illness and substance abuse. 0 Disablility o Disabled tenants especially if the disability is not visible or obvious. o Mental Illness Not as many programs for individ�uals with mental illness. Many veterans and homeless are suffering from mental illness. 0 Victims of Domestic Violence o It can be difficult for victims to access services when they need to leave an unsafe situation. They have to live on the street in order to quality for help. If staying with friends then don't qualify for assistance 9 Arbitrary factors such as tattoos or hairstyles. 0 County or Origin o �People discriminated against because they have non-English surnames S. What are the greatest misconceptions or misunderstandings about housing barriers that you hear in your community?What do you think may be the sources of this misinformation? Prospective tenants think they have to pay for a new background check for every application. If a tenant is turned down for an apartment, they can reuse the background check within 30 calendar days. Misconceptions about what constitutes a reasonable accommodation request. There are some accommodations that are typical and often easy to have enforced. Other accommodations are addressed case by case because laws are not explicit. Requires 3rd party verification. 6. What do you think are the greatest challenges to building community awareness 0 otyl about Fair Housing in your communi Improve messaging. • Need to improve how information is provided to community members. • Relate notices and information to peoples lives N Let people know they are going to learn something Make, sure m�essage�s are written in laypersons terms. Make sure engaging landlords so it is not an "us" vs. "them" conversation Documents are too complex and should be simplified and available in different languages. A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-40 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 473 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'DJ,`N1E� IN Need to make sure that there are representatives at different agencies and providers that can communicate in different languages of local community. 0 Go directly to communities to provide information. • Information should be provided at community gathering places, chIurchIes, schools, coll�eges, and at community and cul�tural events. • Connect with community leaders to disseminate information. These leaders can serve as local ambassadors to the community. • Pl�ace flyers in laundromats and family resource centers. • Find captured audiences at established community meetings. • Hold pop-u,p events at local communIity centers or events. • Go to senior housing complexes and provide information on Fair Housing rights. 0 PartnIer with organizationIs and groups to share informationI. • Target specific cultural groups for outreach in East County such as the AfghanIi, IranianI, Chaldean, PakistanIi, Kurdish, and Indian groups. • Reach out to faith-based organizations (ex. Spanish language churches). • PartnIer with organizationIs that are having an event. Provide quick and simple presentationIs/annou,ncements at the b�eginnIinIg of events, and provide surveys and resource guides. 0 Incentivize and expand how information can be seen/heard. • Provide incentives such as refreshments, free daycare, and raffle prizes. • Use Facebook live posts to broadcast workshops and what's app group posts to get the word out. 7. Do you have any additional comments or ideas related to,the Analysis of Impediments (Al)and the future of Fair,Housing in'the region. 0 Should have a universal rental application to make it easier for tenants to apply and less expensive for landlords to develop. 0 Tap into 211 Community Information Exchange to, help share information in an accessible database. Questions&Answers: 1. What is an exampIe of a reasonable accommodation? 0 An example would be modifying a tub or shower so a tenant can access. 2. Can you refuse'to rent based on the number oftenants, For examp1e, a one- bedroom apartment for three or more tenants? 0 It an depend on the square footage of the apartment and is determined on a case-by-case basis 3. What happens if you have a couple that,rents the apartment and then they invite another individual'to live'there? 0 If the individual is over 18, they would have to be on the lease agreement. 4. What are the criteria for translating documents into different languages? If thIere is a certain population, then documents should be provided in languages S. How do you prove there is discrimination'. Testing is one way to find out if discrimination is taking place A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-41 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 474 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS CSA and Legal aid will still look into it even if not concrete proof and will look into why application denied. They can al�so evaluate further with testing. 6. If you are using a Section 8 voucher does the landlord have to pay for 0 - 'Oft improvements-! No, because the individual is receiving the government subsidy. 7. What is the process if someone makes a complaint to a Fa�ir Housing service provider? 0 It depends on the complaint. The provider will first determine the best investigative tool to use. They wil�l al�so make a request to HUD to see if prior complaints have been filed, interview witnesses, and potentially perform testing. The first step is often to reach out to th�e land lord or provider to have an initial discussion. 8. Is the landlord able to choose a more qualified applicant even if they are not the first to apply? 0 As long as the landlord is using one consistent policy for reviewing application�s. The first in and qualified policy is the most risk adverse. However, nothing mandates that a landlord use this policy. 9. Do Fair Housing laws cover poor living conditions? 0 Will likely fall under Landlord and Tennant Laws unless only people of certain protected class are experiencing these issues. 10.Do Fair Housing laws apply to the purchase of a home'. 0 Yes, they apply in housing transactions. 1 1.Are prospective tenants required to provide a social security number on their application? 0 A tax identification number can also be provided. Landlords have a right to screen tenants but a SSN is not necessary to do they, there are other ways to prove tenants have verifiable income. 12.Do landlords have to advertise what their evaluation criteria are? 0 No, there is no legal requirement, but it is good �practice. 13.What is the difference between service animal and emotional support animal.? 0 Emotional support animals, are not trained and not allowed in public spaces. Service animals are trained and are allowed in public spaces. 14.How can you verify that it is a service animal?Will a tag suffice as documentation? 0 Can ask for documentation as part of reasonable accommodation request. Yes, a tag can suffice. A se,rvice animal is only a dog or a pony. 1 S.If I already have four pets, do I have to allow a service animal onsite�? 0 Yes 16.1f an apartment says no pelts allowed, do they have to allow emotional support animals? 0 Yes 17.1f it is an emotional support animal or service animal, can you require pet deposit or pelt rent or in�surance? 0 No 18.Does the Al look at th e Reg ion�a I H ousin g N eeds Al I ocation 1*n the a na Iysis?, 0 New laws will require COGsto look at Fair Housing in RHNA methodology 0 19.Can you raise rent to cover liability issues associated with children? A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-42 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 475 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS No 20.Does landlord have to clean apartment before tenant moves in? 0 The property must be habitable for people to live in. A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-43 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 476 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"i-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG Cill M,E� ]IS '1 0 111", Wall Gramhilcs r Central �Reg�io�n, October 30, 2019 Workshop A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-44, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 477 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IAL'Yslls oi-'IM p t' v "ll I lltll�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG Cill AIE� ]IS '1 0 I'll" 4ip�" P'P' IMPPW4, jill jjl� Will I gi foir > 7v ?R�;5 #N I mkowo MEN" 101T G�C 70 li A CA lv&��� K11 k \Al dl -pop"% 0 0000\01 M016 "Opp 1), 0 1 1'1111`��'ACIA A-45 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 478 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A�,,,,IALYSIIS at-,IM p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG Cil AIE� ]IS '1 0 111" Eastern Region, �Nolvember 6, 2019 Warkshop ........... I Ll� 111, fr000e Coe", COP tor 044i I?�i go woo wadi OWN if 00A II Opel, WON CAP 1.1104or 40pi A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"N",A: 1-11 A-46 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 479 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IAL'Yslls o"l-,IM,p t, v "ll I lltll�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG Cill M,E� ]IS '1 0 111", A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-47 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 48,0 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IAL'Yslls o"l-,IM p t, v "ll I lltll�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG Cill M,E� ]IS 0 111", Narthern Region, November 17, 2019 Workshop r000* r >Lo� 0 ?J 16-0 1� i(MM, t04 WA > ',AT 10,wl--k %Lwv! Now"_ 4?1,00 Ls dI:;) ?.O� 7S7 >?Agee-, ��141vsmto +1 V9, 00 "o N rpmT%97 M19, I A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"N'L A: i-� i 0 1 1,1111`��,ACIA A-48 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 48,1 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IAL'Yslls o"l-,IM,p t, v "ll I lltll�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG Cill M,E� ]IS '1 0 111", A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-49 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 48,2 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IAL'Yslls o"l-,IM,p t, v "ll I lltll�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG Cill NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Central �Reg�io�n, November 13, 2019 Workshop SAN AL.L14MCr= FOR --------------- t�CIE s 9� LD IN(-A WA-RC-wK;SS FAIR ��OUSINU ...... A,%ALY�ls ov IKVVDIW�KV� to M,-,�POR:7�,;D A-��D SpA,r-ES s S�� 6 P-5S, UTS, 6p, P�kw,,�6 VmA?LAN�T s oM N 6 GMPS C(A ...... ARR I>.W9-AT IF 0 MOST jk5rpL.�r CONSIST RhT- l>-CuRikA�-r mAkr,�znr VC07t KpWtAb TI Uh, ,T pw�R OCC�P#t�Co'� !;TAHPkrRD �e0j'p CW t+71 0 H vl!� —Wl�b cKire kl r.F, "7 1 N C R,G-A 1; t) —TtMwNk76�4 WC. \— VL-A.Y�-?,S bF BAWIMS RS-7AW�70�� W)T OfArr., is s�1�--TD A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D l,"'N"L A: 1-11 i-� i 0 1 J,jlll�IACIA A-50 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 48,3 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IAL`Yslls oi-,IM p t, v 1,11 1 lltll�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-l0lJlll;l'a'NG Cill M,E� ]IS '1 0 111", Southern Region, November 20, 2019 Workshop 100vt 77 49047w,(Oro?WvpKP >11 �>Ient;p;p 0 q v S� NOR 00�40q�p 04% ......... ilio dot k, or C 0����� vie 511 A I?I?E r1lillillill D 1"N",A: 1-11 i-� i 0 1 J,jlll�IACIA A-51 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 48,4 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IAL'Yslls o"l-,IM,p t' v "ll I lltll�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG Cill AIE� ]IS '1 0 I'll" Southern Region, November 21, 2019 Workshop Notre tA r)I'Do 11111M.MI ... . ...... "Vwerw 0441MAL�OI 0& DEW +(A OT '� t Flo; Akmr i O*JA Cm rT ot > LOI .................................... ME > > > "RE OK "CPO> T> A I?I?E 1`11111111111 D A: 1-11 A-52 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 48,5 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Workshop Photos mg mum p j� :'17 1 I,,...............I'll"I, 6 h, If "row, A I?I?E r1lillillill D 1"N',A: 1-1 i_� i,t 0 1 "1"lilk 1"1 A-53 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 48,6 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS F11'S""'I"O]FAUR T-1011)1(1;1'a'NG C111 I I'M 1 "N" Or I ME Jill u AN ANfow'',"', ze MA61FRI4 A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"N',A: 1-1 ii-��i 1,11, 0 1 "1"111 A-54, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 48,7 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-55 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 48,8 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Workshop Agenda SIDRAFF]H The San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing Community Workshop: San Diego Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing AGENDA Workshop Objectives: 1. Explain the background and purpose for the,Analysis 2. Review the definitions and requirements for Fair Housing 3. Learn about typical scenarios of Fair Housing impediments 4. Facilitate community input regarding ongoing public information, outreach, issues, and opportunities 6:00 p.m. 10 Welcome and Introductions Introductions Purpose and Objectives 6:10 p.m. 1111's Presentation: San Diego �Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Definitions and Background 0 What Is Not �Fair �Housing? 0 Fair Housing Resources 0 Federal and State Protected Classes 0 Did You Know?Test Your Fair Housing Knowledge 0 Ways to Participate 6:30 p.m. 111110 Discussion: Fair Housing in Our Communities 0 Issues and Challenges 0 Opportunities and Ideas 7:50 p.m. Me Summary and Ne�xt Steps 8:00 p.m. Close A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-56 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 48,9 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS SDRAFF']H The San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing Taller comunitarlo Ana"lisis Regional de San Diego de impedimentos en la igualdad en la vivienda AGENDA Objetivos del taller 5. Explicar los ante�ce�dentes y e/propo'sito de/ana"lisis 6. Revisar las de�finicione�s y requisitos para iqualdad en la vivie�nda 7. Informarse sobre situaciones hipote"ticas b'Picas de impedimentos en la iqual'a'ad e�n la vivienda 8. Facilitar la participacio"n de la comunidad sobre informacio"n pu"blica, alcance en la comunidad, problemas y oportunidades continuos 6:00 p.m. 10 Bienvenida y pre�se�ntacione�s Presentaciones Propo"sitos y o�bjetivos 6:10 p.m. III P�resentacio'n Ana"lisis Regional de San Diego de impedi'mentos en la igualdad en la vivie�nda Definiciones y antecedentes �Que` se considera que no es igualdad en la vivienda? Recurso�s para la igualdad en la vivienda Clases protegidas federales y estatales �Sabfa usted? Pruebe sus conocirnientos sobre igualdad en la vivienda, Maneras de participar 6:30 p.m. 1110 Discusio5n: Igualclad en la vivienda en nuestras comuniclades 0 Problernas y retos 0 Oportunidades e ideas 17:50 P,.m. IV" Resumen y siguientes p�asos A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-57 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 490 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 8:00 P.M. Clausura A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-58 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 491 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Workshop Comment Card SIDRAFF]H The San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing Community Workshop: San Diego Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing COMMENT CARD Your comments are important to us! Please use this form to provide written comments about the discussion topics. Please return the form to,the facilitators at the end of the event. Thank YOU I Please share any comments about the SDRAFFH or the purpose of this project. A I?I?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 A-59 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 492 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS SDRAFF']H The San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing Taller comunitarlo Ana"lisis Regional de San Diego de impedimentos en la igualdad en la vivienda TARJETA DE COMENTARIOS iSus comentarios son importantes para nosotros! Si'rvase usar este formulario para darnos comentarios, por escrito sobre los temas, que se abordaron. �Entregue el formulario a los, facilitadores al final del eventol. iGracias! Si'rvase compartir cualquier comentario sobre la SDRAFFH o el propo'sito de este proyecto. A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-60 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 493 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Workshop Presentation 3/11/2020 San Diego Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Community'Workshop SDRAFFH Tfie San Diego Regional Nliance for Fair Housing SDRAFFH Partners * City of Carlsbad * City of National City * City of Chiula Vista * City of0ceanside * City of Coronado # City of Poway City of Del Mar City of'San Diego Clity of El Cajoin, City of San,Marcos City of Encinitas City of'Santee City of Escond�ido City of Solania Beach City of Imperial Beach City of'Vista City of La Mesa County of'San Diego City of Lenvni Grove 2 A I?I?E r'11111111il D A: F" A-61 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 494 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/202,10 'Workshop Objectives I Explain the purpose of and background for t,he Analysis 2. Review thie diefinitions and requirememsfor 6ir, housing 3. Learn about ty�pical scenarios offair housing impediments and sollutions 4. Collect community input regarding ongoing public information,outreach,issues and opportlunities,o�n, Fait-Housing 3 Background Jurisdiaions who receive Weral funding,from,HUD ar,e required to,: Administer,grants accorlding�to�the Fa,ir HousingAct "Affirniatively Further Fair Housing of Regional effort -Study For the period of'20120'to 2025 4 2 A 1?1?E r1111111 D 1"N",A: 1-11 A-62 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 495 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/202,10 Purpose of'the Analysis • Reviewoffair housing conditions in the region • Identify potential fair housing issues and concerns, Establish a Fair Hous�ing Plan toaddress,any issues identified Fa*r Housing Definition Fair h�ous,ing,describles,a condition in which individUaJIS Of similar income levels in't,he saire housing market have.a like range of choice ava,ilable'to,thenn.regardless of their, protected class status. Prohibits di sicrimi nation in housing choice because,of' protected class status 3 A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-63 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 496 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3111/2020 Federal and State Protected Classes Federal State, Race Sexwal Orientabon Color Marlital Status 'Re4igion Ancestry 'Sex Age, National Or�igin Source of lincome Familial S�tatus, Gender Identity and Expression, Physiol and/or Merital * Genetic Condition, Disability # Primary Language 0 Arbitrary Nctor�s, 0161er California,Laws 11""ligration Status Freedom fromViolence or Indmidation, '7: What is NOT Fair Housing? * Affordability Affbi-dabil'ity issues are,not f�,W housing issues,,unless, affordability dispropoi-tionaltely impacts,a protected class, # Tenant/Landlord Issues Tenant/landlord disputes are not fair housing issues, unless,the disputes are based on pi-otected classes ................... A I?I?E r111111,1 D 1"N",A: 1-11 A-64 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 497 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I llvl�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/2020 FAIR HOUSING ASSISTANCE For more information and assistance wi+(air housing,please contact the following servi'"mg Son Diego County. CSA Legal AidSocietij of San Sian Diego CGunt% Diego (�"I Se Ll v C�,F�: i I�U eI.C w�v i jJ u.D 0 1,El 0.r1i Lj.�, III"V I .......I.1.1. Ndvjl� riq C!�_m*,r `PhOhe;,'�a',44)4,49 4$00 toff,Free;1,1060),954—0441 Pbone,(0,14534-Z5,24 MANN OFFICE NOOTIA COUNTY PFFICE ,32,1 Vap kink.ofoa Akniocf,' rm I"CojO),,,CA M'20' 'RAY01SPE RANZA, MIDTOW WSAN 0 I1KD OFF ICE FAM I WK�0 U k�fi CENJ F 13" �,'�WaoDiog VenLWS00-I,�00 T 4,53"A f b 1,1b, ,sc)U,rk rAst,,,,sAN(AS00 00XV "A Iwifi_.6 W"Ok U,1,10"Q', U'J". 35 f flum I Y�A WWW',04A.046 0', CSA�,", Sin 111,005 County SDRAFFH WWW SEWARPHOUSING-ORG 9 Te�`&StYour Fair Housing Knowledge 10 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"N',A: 1-1 t_� i,t 0 1 "1"111 1"1 A-65 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 498 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/2020 Federal and State Protected Classes Federal State # Race Sexwal Orientabon * Color Marital st"awls, *'Refigion Ancestry 0 Sex fte Nabonal Origin Source of lincome Familial S�tatus Giender Identity and Expression, Physical and/or Mental 0 Genebc Condition, Disability # Primary Language # Arbitrary Nctor�s, Other California Laws I$t,Irnmigration Status # Freedorn frorn Violence or Indmidation 14 Scenario #I ,A landtoird relfuses to,rent yo�u an apa,rtmealt becauw your, pr1mary siource ofiricome is unemployment insurance.Is this ok? C3 This is 10K OThis is not 01K 6 A I?I?E r111111,1 D 1"N",A: P'1_� i 1,1, 0, 1�"1"13% 1"1 A-66 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 499 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/202�10 Scenario #11 A landlord refuses to rent you anapartment be�cause your primary source o�f income is unemployment insut-ance.Is, this ok? Mims is OK ®R Thisis not OK 13 Did'You Know? It is illegal'to discriminaw against an individual's Ali source of # lt� income —which can include,but�is not limited to.Social Security,Supplemental Seicurity�Income(SSI), uneniployment insurance,orveteran's benefits,,., Mosit recently,Cal[farnia law is expanided to include #'f'ederal,statie,or local,pt,sblic ass 11's tanice,and federal,state,or local liotising subsidiliel.s" as part of the"sourc:e of"I'rilcon��te�#'Pi�,,otlect*t'oni 14 7 A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-67 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 500 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/202,10 Scenar�i I o #2 A prospective tenant,brings her service�animal to an apartment community.However,the landlorld refuses to allow the animal into the leasing oifficle.Is, this ok? 1:3'Thjs js 0K. [3 This is not OK Scenlarl"'o #2 A prospectivetenant brings her service animal to an apartment community.However-,the landlord relfuses,to allow the animal into the leasing office.Is this ok? 1:1 Th is is 0,K IJ Tfiis is not,OK A I?I?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 A-68 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 501 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/2020 Did'Y,,6u Know? I The right to bIa accompan,ied by a dog in public places under clie Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)applies onlyto service a6l'ma,lls. What about,therapyammalls? Those,that provide psycholo&a]or physiol4caltherapy to individuals other than their handlers, 11 # QL ervio,tional sup,por't animals? Those,that provide their owners with emotional comfort Theise,animals are addressed in fair housing 1;avvs.but not,ADA. M01 Scenario #3 A tenant with a disability asksto have,her kitchen and bathroom counters lowered.The landlord agrees,but, asks the�tenant to pay for the cha,ngels herself.Is tbis ok? 13'This is OK 0 Tfiis,is not OK A I?I?E r111111,1 D A: F"1_� 1,1, 0, 1 "1"13% 1"1 A-69 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 502 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3111/2020 Slicilienarlio #3 A tenant with a disability asks to have her kitchen and bathrloom colitinters lowered.The landlord agilves but asks theten�ant to pay fo�r the changes herself.Is this,ok? '"r t",o i s'Is.;,0 K ElThis is,not OK Did Yo u K n:l ow Tenants w�ith a dis,ability arel financially respionism"ble for 'any neclessary i mproverne nits to theit-holusing unic, if the hou�s,ing unit is part o�f'a government subsidized project or received government funding,then,thie property owner would be financially responsible. 2ol 10 A I?I?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 A-70 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 503 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/202,10 Scenari,o #4 A,landlord doles not want to rent a s,econ�d Hoor u�nit to a famil�y with small children because he fears the children mlay fall and hurt thernselves.Is this,olk? [I This is OK 0 This is,not,OK 2 1 Scenaribi #4 A,landlord does not want,to rent a s,elcond floor unit to a f4mily with small children because he fears the children May Call and 'hurt thernselves.Is this ok? 0 This is,OK EF71 Tbis,is not OK ................... 22, A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-71 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 504 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/202,10 Dild You Know? This is calledsteering and it is illegal. A landlord can not restrict certain teriants to specific units, or specific Ilocations,of the community lim000m.. 23 Sceniarib #5 A cotiple,has been paying$11,000 a, rnonth in rent for a one-beldroorn apartment.However,the pair recently had a,baby,and when a landlord finds out,�she raises the i-eint to$1,250.Is this ok? 0 This is OK M This is,not OK 2.4 12 A I?I?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 A-72 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 505 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/2020 Sicenar�l I o #5 A coupille has ble�e�n pay�ing,$1,000,a month, in re�nit�for a onie bedro.om apartment.However,the pair recently had a,baby,andwhen a tandlord finds out,she raises the rent to$1,250.Is this o�k,? 0 This is OK J'F Pik 1-s, rio���t OK 2-5 Fn� Did"You Know? Varying the rent,for a,unit,basield�on the number of tenants—sornetin'ies referred to as"head renif I discriminates against large fAmillie'S. A person,is,an unrelated Friend? What,if thie additional thit What K it is a significant,other! What ilf it is,a s,amie sex significan'tother? A number of factors can influence Whethera rent increase violates fair housing,lam. If diis filas hoppened to yoo,contact lofair housiog professional for advice, 26 13 A I?I?E r111111111il D A: 1-11 A-73 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 506 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/2020 Disicussion 27 Federal and State Protected C!"imses Feder�al State, * Race # Seyual Orientation * Color # Marital Status Rdfeon * Anoestry Sex # Age Na,tional O�rigin Siolurce of Income * Familial S�tatus Gen4er Idenbityand Expression Physical and/or Mental Gene'dc Condition Disability Primary L,3hgU,"A8,e Arbia-ary Facwrs Other California Laws * Immism,tion Status * Freedom from Violeoccoir lodrnida6on 28 A I?I?E r'11111111il D A: F" A-74 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 507 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11120210 Discussion Have yolu(oli-someone you know)ever experienced housin�g di scri mi nation? For what reason do you believe�you have been discriminated againstl(e.&age,,,fai'T�Jy,status,race,etc. If yolu believe�you've be�ein,discriminated against,have you reported ithe inci�dent?Who did YOUll report the incident 'to? Where did you gol for help?what,was,your experience m4d)dve pet-sonlorganizati,on that hicAped yot0 29 Discussion What ai-e the moist common barriers to housingin your community? What protected classes have,the gr�eatest needs�for, improved service,,and why.) 3101 A I?I?E r1lillillil D 1"N',A: A-75 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 508 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/11/202,10 Discussion Whalt,are the greatest,misconceptions or misunderstandings about,housing bar,riers that you heiar inyour community?What do you think may be the sources o(this misinformation? 'What do you think are thegreatlest challenges to building COMMUnity'awareness about f�ir holusing in your community? 31, Dii�sicussion Do yo�u have any adiditional cornments or ideas related to. the An�alysis of Implediments(Al)and thle future ofl4ir hOLIsing in the regioW 32 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-76 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 509 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 3/1112020 two a 33 17 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"N',A: 1-1 i_� 0 1�"1"13,111 A-77 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 510 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/2612020 AnWisis de Impledlimentios a laViviendaijusta en 111a,Reg,lon,de Sian Diego Taller Comunitano SDRAFF'H The San Diego RegionalAilliance for Fair Housing Participlantes en SDRAFFH Ciudad de Carlsbad C�iudad de 10cleanside Guidadde ChulaVista Ciudad de Poway Ciudad die Coronado Ciudad de San Die,90 Ciudad de Del Mar # Ciudad de San Marcos # Ciudad de El Cajon 0 Ciudad de Santee # i Ciudad de Encinitas 0 Ciudad de Solana Beach # Ciudad,die Escondido Ciudad de'Vista * Ciudad die Imperial Bieach Condado die S�a,n Diego, ,* Ciiludad die La Mesa Ciudad ide Leimon Grove Oudad die National Cilty 2 A I?I?E r'11,11,11il D A: F" A-78 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 511 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020 Ob et 1, 1vols, del Taller 1. Explicar el propo"sito y el contexto del ana"lisis 2. Revisar las def"Inicionesy requisitios pat-a,la vivienda justa Aprender sobire las situadones tipicas,de impledimentos, de vivienda jiusita,y las,soluciones. 4. Obtener comentarios de 11a comunidad con respecto a la Ird6r-macia"In,plu'blica dispionible,la divulgado"n�de informado"n,y los problernas y opot-tunidades,s,obre[a Vivienda justa Contexto Las jurisdicdones,que r(m:dben fondos fedet-ales,de HUD deben: # Administil-ar subvenciones,de acuerdo,con la Ley de Equidad deVivienda # "Afirmativamente,f6mentar Ja vivienida justa" # Esfuer-zo regional —Este es,tudio es,pa,ra el pleriodo del 2020 a 2025 A I?I?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 A-79 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 512 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I llvl�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020 Propo"sito del An a"'lisis * Revisar las condiciones de vivienda jus,ita en el Condado * Identificar pilosibles problemas y preocupaicionies sobire la, vilvienda,justa * Establecer un plan de mienda justa parla atendier licualquier problerna,identifica,do Definiclon de Vivienda Jusilta La vivienda justa describe una condicio"in en la,clual la,s plersonas cion niveles de ingresos,similares en el mismo mercado de vivienda benen a su disposicio"n un,rango simi'llar de eleccio"rii, indepiendientemente de su estatus de clase pr�ote,lgida. Prohibe la,discriminado'n en la efecdo'n de vivienda,plot- pertenecer a ginal,cc a,se 6 3 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: A-80 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 513 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020 Clases, Protegidas a Nivel I Fedeiral y Estatal Federal Estatal * RlAra 0, Orientad 6in Sexual Color # Estado Civil, Religib"111 A,scendenda Sexio E'dad Origen N�acional Fuente de Ingresios Conidid6n Familiar Idenddaid y Expresio'n die G einero Dscapacidad Ment.4 Y/bi Fillstca, Condidiones Gerxifica Lensuaie Primario F-riaores Arbitrarticts Otri Leyes deCalifornia Estatus Migratairio Libertaid dieViolencla o Indirru"d-wo'n lQlue' NO es'Vivieiida justa? 14 Aseilquibilidad Los problemas de a,sequibiilidad no so�n pi-ciblemas de vivienda justa.a menos que la asequibilidad afect,e despropot-frJonadamente a un,a clase protegida Problemas,entre Inquilinal/Propietario Las disputas entre inquilinos yi propietarios,no,son, problemas de vivienda,justa,a,menos que la,s disputas se blasen en clases protegida,is 4 A I?I?E r'11111111il D A: 1-11 A-81 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 514 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020, "RECURMS RE[GUAL",",DADEN LA VIVINDA, Pritv ph*,nqr sabro In iiaupild,plo pri I"vivienda, ponqw-u dn CDmdudode San Di4so. CSA Legal Ald Socletq of Son San Diego countg Diego &J,elE"Jr,I, ClhuLa Viwta D C. 11,k"I U I I oul 0" tj C"ljJkp de 5.&U i�� 4,44-"5�70,0 Tet f,,844)449-:35010 Tch JB7711 534-15,24, OR"I C INA'RR INC,I PAL,, fil(49 'A,20 2015, 9 ,26 I,A 4,5,ur bkgo Avt�riu�,,�ul 6%,am Dipp,CA,92,11D A DEL SURESTE DEW4,00W, "I UP'S�,llubl-d AverlUe "WWWAASSI)X)RO' Fian 0 i-f�9 o Cou n ty e ISDRAFFK, WWW,SDFAJRl 101USING.ORG 9 Ponga a, Prueba Su 0 ib Conocimiento de V a 0 lvlemda Justa 10 5 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"N'L A: 1-1 i_� 0 1 "1"111 A-82 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 515 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/2,6/2020 Caso #I Un propietario nega rentarle a usited un apartamento porquesu primaria f'uente de ingresos,es la aseguranza de�l idesempleo.*Estio es aceptable? 0 Sl es aceptable 0 NO es,aceptable Casio #I U�n propietario nega rentarle a usited un apartamento parque s,u primaria,fulente de ingresos es,la asegurariza del desempleo.iEsto esaceptable?, 0 S1 esacepitable 0 NO es ace:,ptj,ble 12 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-83 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 516 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020 eiSabia, Usted? Es,ilegal disc,riminar,contra la"fuente de'ingresas"'die un individ�ual—clual puede inc�luir,pe�ro no se limita,a. Seguro Social,Seguridad de Ingreso Suplementario,('SSI),, aseguranza de�l desemplect o beneficios de vieteranos. Redenteti'verite,,la,[ley ide California se ampli'lo, para i,mitAir"asistend"a pukh"cafederal,estatal o local,y subs'lidlos de vi'volerwida,federales,,esta,t 0es,D,locales"' %*I coml,o parte de.,la protet'lic'16"Y"i die"fule0le de*irigresoisi 13 Casol #2, Un plosible inquilino ti-ale a su animial de servido a, una,comunidad die apartamentos.El p�ropieta,rio niega permitir que lei ariimal entre a la,oficina,del alquiler. iEsto es aceptabille? 13 S1 es acepta,ble 0 NO es,areptable .................. 14 A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-84 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 517 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I llvll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/21102'0 Caso #2 Un plosible inquilinotrae a su��animal de siervicio a (una carnunidad de apartamentiols.,El propietario niega plermitir queel animal entre a la oficina,de�l alquiler. i,Esto es acepitable? 0 Sl es aceptable M, NO es aceptable Sab", U sted i, ila El derechode se,r acompah'ado plos�,un perro,en un lugar publico bajo la Ley sobre Estaidounildenses con Disicapacidades (ADA)aplica sotio,a los, anilmals de sew-viclo. iQue tal atumales de terapilia", (6 1 it Los que proven terapia psicolo"gica o wo 61911ci para,per5oilillt's distintas de sus cuidadores, i0animales de apop ernoclonal? Lois que proveen sus duefios,cion apoyo emodonal Estiosanimals son,abordadois en leye,s de vivemda justa.pero no en la Ley ADA. 8 A I?I?E rillillillil D A: 1-11 t_� i i,t 0, 1 "1"13%]��',A,Cl l"I A-85 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 518 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020 Casol #31 Uri inquilino discapacitado requiere que bajen la altUra de los mosti-adores,en su codna,�y,en su blan'o., El pi-opietaslo, I es�ta` de acuerdo,pero le pidle a la inquilina que ella mismia pague�plo�t-�ol:s c,,amiblios.,*Esitol,e�s;kceptable?l e 13,Sl les,acleptable C3 NO es aceptable 17 Casol #3 Un inquilino discapacita,do re�quier-�e quie bajen la altura de lois mostr-adorles,len s,u c,ocina y en su blaflo. El propietar-iol esta d�e acuei-do,perlo le pide a la inquilina+,je ella misma pague p,ot-lbs canibios.,jEsto es aceptable? G, SO es ac��,ep,*,..,,,able [3 NO es ace�p�table 18 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-86 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 519 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I llvl�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020 ,,Slab*a Usted? Inquilinos discapacitados,son fit')lancieran,'iente,resporisabi,es, por cambiols nelces,iariols en su unidad de vivienda., t,M,,si launidad es partie de un proylecto del vivienda, subvencionadol por el goibierno ol recibe foindos del gobilerno,el propietairio es finanderamente respionsable., Casol #4 U�n pt-opietariol no quiere alquilar una unidad del siegunido piso a una famil�lia,con ni6os peque6os plorque teme que los nifios se puedan Cael-Y�la.Stimlarse.-Es,t�io es aceptable? 0 S1 les,aceptable 0 NO es aceptable 20 10 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-87 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 520 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0l,'lM'Pt,,'DJ,`Nl,E� 2/26/2021',0 Casol #4 Un propietarial no q�uiere alquilar una u�nidad de segundol p�iso a una�familia con nin-os,pequenos pl�or�que teme qu�e Iasi nihosse puedan caer y lastimarse.-Esto es aceptable? 13 Sl es aceptable IE NO es ace-pta,ble ........... 21 �#Sabla Usted? Esto se,Mania"conducclion"'(steering)y es,ilepl. Un pt-opietariol no puede poner restillcdolnesa ciertos, inquilinos para unildades esRecificas o porc,toines de la, comunidad, ............................. 22 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-88 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 521 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I llvl�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020 Casol #5 Una pareja a estado pagando$1,0010 al mes,en renta por unaplartamento d�e una recimara,., La pareja a tendo�u�n biebk, recientementei y cuando se da cuien'ta.la propietaria. ella l�es sube la�renita a$1,250.iEsto es aceptable? 0 S1 es,acieptable [3 NO es areptable 23 Caso #51 Una pareja a estado pagandal$1,000 al mes en rienta poir un apartamento del un�a recaimara., Lapilareja a terilido,un, beble' recientementey, cuando se da cuenta,el propietario, el lessube la,renta a$1,.2501.iEstol e�s aceptable? 0 S1 es aceptable M NO ctis aceptable 24 12 A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"'N"L A: 1-11 A-89 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 522 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020 iSablia usted? Variar la renta de una unidad'dependiendo del n6rnero de mqt0linos,—a veces se le refiere,como"'head rent"�—discrlm�na contra Cammilias,grandes. PMI Que,tal s�i bt,adici O"'n de.(una,terceric person es un ami�go sin relabo"n faroiliar? Quetal si es nlue�s,tra pareja? Quetal sl es,nuestra pareja del mismo sexo,.) Un numero,de factores pueden influir si ekiurnento a la renta,viola las leyes de vivienda justa. S"i esto le ho posado.p6ingase en co�ntoc,to con on pmfkiono1*vivendo justo poro que k uconse)eif). Diiscusion 2(5 13 A I?I?E r111111111il D 1"N',A: 1-11 A-90 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 523 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I llvll�[ 01C � Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'DJ,`N1E� l 2/26/2020 Discusion t�Ha usted o aiguien quecorioce sufrido discriminacion en on cree!que ha,sido discriminWO(pior ejetTi0o,,iedad,, iPor que' razl' famiha�emdo.nua.etc,,) Si cree,que ha sido discrimiltiado.*ha deminciado el incidentO, iA quie"n denunc�io" ell incidente). - (A donde fue Por allytida?j",Cual(tic su experiencia con 1A persom 1 orga nizacio*in que,lo apdo'I 14l 27 Discusion t-Cuailes son las,bairreras,mas comunes paral la vivienda en s,u comminidad.) t-�Que' clases proltegidas,benen Jas mayares necesidades de mejoramiento en,servi�cios ypor qu eP 14 A I?I?E riiiiiiiiiiI D 1"N",A: 1-11 i_� i i,t 0, 1 "1"13%]��'ACI 1"1 A-91 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 524 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C ,Ais�iALYSIS 0F'lM'Pt,,'DJ,`NlE� 2/2,6/2020 Discusioln t-Cua"les,son los mayores conceptos erro"nellos o malentendidlos,sobt-le las barreras de vivienda quie escucha eti su coniuiijdad??-Cua"'les cree que pUeden ser la,s fuentes,de esta,informado"n erro"Inea,,.; tiCua"lesson los mayores desaffos para crear condend I a comunitaria solbre la vivienda justa en su,comunidad? Discusilon jiene alp'n co�mentario adicional o ideas relacionadas con el Ana"Jisis de Impedimentos(At)y el futurode la 11 0 ? vivienda,justa en, la regio�n. 15 A I?I?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 A-92 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 525 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I lltll�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 2/26/2020 J-pCo"mo Puede Continuar Participando? Al" 31 16 A I?I?E r1lillillill D 1"N",A: 1-11 A-93 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 526 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Workshop Handout Resource Guide I F H A11R I OUSING ASSISTANCE For more information and assistance with fair housing, please contact the following, organizations serving San Diego County. CSA Legat Aid SocietV of Son Son Diego CountV Diego Servi ng the cites of:Chu la'Vista,E I Cajon,Nat ional Serving the cities of.-Carlsbad,Coronado,Del'M a r,Enci nitas,,, City,Santee,a,nd the Unincorporated East County* Escondido,[mperial Beach,La Mesa,Lemon Grove,Oceanside, Poway,San Diego,San Marcos,Solana Beach,Vista,and the County of San Diego. "e',n' ',ter Phone:4619)444 , 5100 P,hon�,,,,e,*(844")"44'9�-35�00, G e 0 e:,ra I I,nq tries" 0,441, A '77) 534, 2,524, Mom; `8 nf" &,4sa.org, 0 MAINOFFICE NORTH,COUNTY OFFICE ,32 7,Va, ri H`o,u.,te n,Av 0 n u e 216S, "remont S E,I Ca 22- Oceanstde,CA 92,054 jon,CA 9, 0 RAY0 E"SPERANZA, MIDTOWN SAN DIEGO OFFICE' FAMILY RESOUCE CE NTER 1�7 64 S an, D tegoAve it e,200 ,16:53 A�ba, ,,,Ave,,,, San D*e1go,,,CA 92,110, Cholla Vi�ta,CA9' 19`11, M'SANDIEGO,OFFICE S,.,E'uct"d Avenue',, CA'�'2114, San Diegro,:,,,. 9, p r,te ite 94 ,WWW,C$4A.'ORG WWWtA$SD'40RG, Aft. ?m CSA S,an Meg,o�County SDRAFFH WWW.SDFA1RH0US1NG.0RG A 1?1?E r,,,1 1)1"N",A: 1-11 A-94, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt Page 527 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS RECURSOS DE IGUALDAD EN LA, 'VIVIEND�A 1100 8 a Para obtener ma'sinformiaclon y asistencia sobre la igualidiod en la,v.iv-ieinda, 4 0 p ongase en contocto con las siguientesorga n"I'zaci ones que wrven el Condodo de i Son Diego. CSA Legal Aid Soc*tetg of San 0 Sion Diego Countu Dteqoi Sirviendo a lais Ciudadesde:Chula Vi'sta,El Cajon, Sirviendo las C_iudades de,:Carlsbad,Coronado,Del Mar, Rational City,Santee,y el Condlado del Este no Encinitas,Esconidido,Imperial Blealch,La Mesa,Lemon Giirovie, Ocea nis 1 d e,Powa y,Sa n Diego,Sa n M a rcos,So I a nia Beac hi,V1 sta, inco�rporiaidio* y el Cloindadio de San Diego, 'Centrode Vivi'enida,J usta 'Tel't. (6 19)4.44 - 5 700 Tek (844) 449 -35,100 Gratul"'tal- 1 (8 1 00) 954 - 0441 ConsultasGeneral'le'is T1'' _77 ;n,fo@c4,sa.,,org ehi (8 534 - 2524 OFICINA PRINCIPAL, OFICINA DEL NORTE DEIL CONDAD110, 327 Vi Houten Avenue 2161,S.Tremont Street E I C ai o n,CA 9 210,20, Oceanside, CA 9,2054 RAYO ESPERANZA OR UNA DEL CENTRO UE SAN Ull EGO ��FAM I LY RESOIUCE CENTER 1.764 Sain ,Dilego Avenue, Su"Ite.200 Sa n D1 1 ego CA 912 11,10, 1,65 3 Al bany Ave. A C, 9 119 1 C h u":1 a V"I"st a OFI,ICl��NA,DE'I,L,S',URE,S'TE DE SAN DIEGO 1,10 S. Eudid Avenue (A t 15 y ortedie San Diego, CA,92114 Con d a do de I rste no 6ro rporado.,o 11,ested la,aultol, sta Al n la inite,reesta,I,Al 94 WWW'*CS4A,.0'RG W'WW.LA5iSD,.0RG, Ali CSAf',/',, San D'iegio County SDRAFFH WWW.SDFA1RH0US1NG.0RG A I?I?E r'11111111il D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-95 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 528 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Appendix Eo. Outreach Materials �P�ub�lic Notices SD,,RAf:M, TH F.S,A r4 D I E�G 0 R E G I()N;L L ,A L L LANCE FOR FA I R t,!0 t,,;St N15 F�A I R HOUSING —WO,R X�S H 0 P S SDRAFM THE SAWDIEGO REGIONAL ALLIANCE FO�R FAIR HOUSING sid(airliousing.org gpn U1, 01 L.L ----------------------- 'Your inpull,is in�%portant EASTERN REGION to,uinlide,rstaniding the worlks"b"c"P ity"s needs cotmilmium ott,lid poterviial solutilolls for reduch-tign holusimc j Attend aiworkshop nearyour i/4 co mm m U II ty ��N 0 WTH 9 R N REGION SOUT44ERN REG1,011N E]scancfv��Jo C�ly Hall, T,?acm',T1 a 70 A ve:.,umo,�, 2,01 14,cxrt],�� C Eau z�,`vl s C,A,9V9tC),S CENTRAL REGION YtIl, Vlcl Uj�/,06''I(-'ft 2,01" y (.J'I,v�CA gici 113)l L%F-FlA�,$l r"y Z"t E 1,t e fl�4 C)� ri tl� 14uyvrra[��el- For rnoj e,iri fornvrvfi,�Mt,1�lk,7� V;11110�e y",rrs,, , I w,,",11")� 5 to T,:4 5 w fror dir,Pl,—)t0roric.'8 11111a bl�'n r"',i Elk r 0 c"'V's"e's�'S,p,�c &o in��ci,� ki,�n r, r,�,ry 'Fly��''11,7,��ti,��,,"",)/")t�,,�,�l,)e�i,�,�,�,,,,:Realn 72 km�,,(n 5 k ,rt: Ow,wL pkr)iro,�,1619-682-384 33,�") zir�, 114 (Qhenry� r�,nkigz,,ckjry,,c,"Dirrik) A[1)1?E r111111111ill D 1"'K,A: 1-11 i-� 1,1, 0 1 "I-f 1"t /k,C 1[1 A-96 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 529 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS ........... SDRAFM THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FAIR FlOUSING 7"A L I,E R E S S 0 B RE LA �IGUALDAD iDRAFM THE SAN DIEGO REG1014AL ALLIA14CE FO�R FAIR 14011SING sdifairkousing.lorg If VVY 0 A 11 ME iiiiiiii Im ilgiiii 11 S,us conn e,nt,c3rio,,s .,o,ri R VON ESTE mriportarites para,entanider laljr.,�vo) lus inlecesiduAles de[a comu,fidlud y las po$ �'e C;5-EK) al FV�('-�V-J'P"rla' i lbles slolucuo�nes paraireduclir t ck'del""lc.� d C' lu distrli".inudo'lli en�la viviesida.Asilstoo untaller "r IV cerical de su comounidaid: CA,9Z,D;4a REG16N ',SUR WEG16N INIOR'T'E [2 talleii IV[6 rc'A'��J rJul htevwi?p D llf"? y�,irrnt a" LJU p n] id'o Escorti:llido, I "h'st a,k""'A�"ll"""'4 8'f"'09- REGION CENTRAL 6 8()0 (2,�!alleres) cia IJatiorta,.�City 1,,A]PL J r 'I've 6, ;virri,, 14 0"1",ast 1 21�,11,11,s 1,r ee t" t I �lill"S'C�e,i,tc,:r r'i i a e,,:1 (it" r ty,(""Arl 5)s(l) T'l AV00r'we'�"4"'uitv A 9 2') S So clesicx:�Womic-l'ici ack"I""ICTlial lv%i'���"-c al e��i 1-"'I" rl'o y i,e�lv�k�'T'p;10 2(19 COO(",)uilmn 1-lenvy 7`2 '311 84 3 1"), r 6,v ii Cl C, 5 14 11: e it,�5.',t �e n ir y0rn,9 co rn,�co in,W�l Sziaii A 9 2 114 A[1)1?E r"111111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 ii-� 1,1, 0 1 "1",1"t /kl("1[1 A-97 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 530 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C ........... SDRAFFH THESAN DIEGO REGMNAL ALLIANCE F"Ok FAIR 1101.131 11IG [�IAU� R) iDRAFM THE SAN DIEGO REGIOI,IAL ALLIA14CE FO�R FAIR 14011SING sdfairkousing.lorg 2221�� Mail ck, ckja" J, 2019 A 7 i>cl'ALLo ot�;J' vl Id'"A',AAo > "15 t4t)r P i B,�o a rteva, 2,D'I a Ick' LA,ko' 4 J""' id" As�.),� A 21019.��m�e,,'Aq,,2D c 81 7 t'xj i e- 6 0 10 z'L"j'Pj":00 I(N Ls"J 14 AA2,L!')J .1) ell"W-9 -4.1W Roic')rn 161 276 Av�rd,,riue,&,kAdirq 110(')�C`rviic r',;,'enler%Nay,B'Cajc��,,�1 9,2020, 11..lil 2 A 9'19 10 C hik)i *2M D "I 9t juub ,2 13 oll 4 &4,5, CLA.F�1 b ,I, A pO n cii�Nn k ffwla tt�o r Ti L 0 ir�1�1) 1'40 East'12th,St�re t 4,is"..r, tN'�,4,bon�il Oty,CA,5-M950 M iialbi-F"i.,,i r pc,,� Rou"n -1 " '"i 1,1_J11 J��'s_"'u�W.i D ei,�)"HC` ,5148 MaN'.,,,�f t St, 011'44,go,CA 92114 2019 "i�� "�'j V 310 E'W'() ir-A 6 0,01 jhts centx"""'ur T'2 n J41%W ja" LISC San DR,- o A `��19 4'54 23�",51,' 4; r c" T "fill 4 1.))1f 1TVf,,,:r"5Aty,Aveflue 43 06, n E)Jego,CA 92 C015 A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"N'L A: 1-1 i_� 0 1 "1"111 A-98 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 531 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL Ais�i,ALYSIS FAl'R 1-lousirw Qmma�, SDRMFH THE SA,N DIEGO REGIONAL ALLIA24CE FOR FAIR F101MING sox= 2" .. ................. ............... SURAFM TH E S A,K D,I E(,*,01 R F.0 t�O 14 A 1. ALAAANCE FO�R FAIR 110USING sAfairkousing.lorg ........... 2(3 9 1 cis 6 MR1 I Q f 2 El Coyon AN .6,71 r J- 2 0 �l f�;2 Escon&do.92026 140 East 12th Street City Heights AM, a t I"D n, (",�;q',y ��,X%9 0 ............... . .... T 3 L I Nq E, �Y ', 5 - Jr, 7�2 X (6 19-6 8 22 "1 3 7' J; 51411 Mwel St 1.......A A I[)I?E r"11,11,111 D l"N",A: P[J I Ll, 0 1 "1"'[1,1`�AC,1[1 A-99 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 532 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS ........... S,DR,MFH THESAN DEEGO REGIONAL ALLIANCE FOR,FA I R H0TJST NG, MC3"A' SA, MAKATARUNGANG PA BA 1-1 A Y iDRAFM THE SAN DIEGO REGIOIIAL ALLIA14CE FO�R FAIR 14011SING sdifoirkousing.lorg Aoo /Pi Mahalaga ang it"'yong" SILANGANG REHIYON (I Worki-top) sailo,ohiinsou pug-um3wa ing intgo,paingang'a Hangan, ri, 6''. pj,�71,ha�%jgga "m ,g ko im u rdud a d a 1,rng cm ol i ce Ve r t,r, i t iyal nasiolusyan potens pava mfubuwalsan ung """", '11", rVII-11 E I'll N011, SC pabahay.Dunrvaloso workshop, nic vvi,alapit so KATIMUGANG W"E'HIYON iy*nq koimunldad: HILAGANG REHIYON zl�7( Fburth Avc,rvcie,D,,,tildivq,�C'�4, ? P,001ft ri,b I[,, 6 c"'00, rx ii� ['1"a rl,g f p"I'a GITNANG R,EHIYON it s" (2'Wo rk sh c,),p) 1,41 1 LK J"rh,.("I"C")2,111),IIUII�b 11,v,C"',c1A 0i r 0�k''rullre 34D,2(319 tath, ?"'I oi It ic'n'01,I "I"t y7,,C-A so'l, 5 o ,yr f g, i V r,; ar�t Q'It",N ttl h W V�A,, p, So �"v:r)F nw I 4 ?gz�r�rg`"45, kxzry&,,6inin�-k,.mnry Y 72 c;xa: ago c',ing, pum o"ill ojd,��m�,�,C )M)[6�j,9-682-38,doll bf,a,�i�B lv!a "!"3 1 El',�I'olegO 2,' 7) A[1)1?E r1111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 ii-� 1,1, 0 1 "I-f 1"t /k,("1[1 A-100 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 533 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL Ais�i,ALYSIS FA1'R 1-lousirm Qmma�' SDRAFFH "r 11 F!S A N D I EC3()R E C!;10 14 Al,L P&LIJAIMI,�",'F'C)P,VAIV,140kP5MP-M,�3 H(51 "T HA Co ------ NHA' C 0�kG, B AN G ............... SDRAFFH 'TH t���3,A'N�D I E G 0 Ik E Gt C)N A 1.1, Al FAIR110TYSING sdfairhovsin�q,orq FE I ............ H NO J ............ m oom '�, kie"'nr_46ng g6p P.1y KHLJ W.J"CRI..i flk 0 0 N(3 Ivi 16 rzit lrp�g c16 thic d(,,r cj,�c,rt,1--i'u cz�u c,j a C'-0 111�11 ",,'h,'C r)q0'v'6 21(719, 6 gkv 9��,rt&' fi( ,1 1.)C1 1 a rn p �Iy M', bilit d, i ri�a 6 11 tharn dtr,�rrf6t '16i thfic)garn Vqary I E IC,,:ij,l� CA cong dbn,g ckJa qkjy v; KHLJ'V(. Kki!U V'Lr'C PF[11%111104 )'C; F)Hi'A B4C INLY Nbrn,y1by 7!h6ng I I rkwn 2019 Thu Ta.ryj6y 20 21 �5 6 tt,�i�16r�8 �,6 J "V i C "y ESCCmMAjD C>y K&L MONO Room �"S B"I Esmndtky 92015 K I-I�U V TRUNG'TAM ("i 9 (2 H64 tt�6c) "Diu"W,rqldy 1!31 g�0 r��f�r r�t 2(jil 01"tl� 6 g�c5'16,1 cl6r"�,8 �6� I`,yi�j��p�, C��'y Claver do Us"!scri[Tegg-A 14()E� k5 r'4 t' I?54�"'3 j 5i�,�i kie "'A't""�6,01 th&n tt'i rm 0%Q chi d9ir,l:fiv"Ih� 101 7nr rTgrby 13 fh%q 11 700", (JI'1A I W)US I"Al QM I dKA1,VU '��i h5i 7 65 10 lk'�rll 1))n,� li lot 1-1e�n ry 72�k,.",r't rtrf&f."-'kt Ili X t Vir';h �&1,ra t'hjl�"""o ttic".�J s" 11 38A s6 asy etwiia)),l 040 Wwkel Sh S 4,921 4 rmgc aviconj, A I[)I?E r"111111111 1)1"N",A: P t_� i I,[(,":�0 1 "1"'[1 1`�AC,1[1 A-101 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 534 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS �El-b�lasts H 0 U Sill�`N S 1J ........ I a Y u 1, 'We WN n1l, to He a,r, Imm ro mi o rj-,j 6 Ij 2/1") j w�, f(;,I, l�,, �-r 'u),`,J, T/ T, 1 i 61�(ci, Y/,, f, u'711" IT d"', 'J, ""1 11 r ii "",.......... "T S D fl S 6" [!1,1` r%J �1///,!, r� r .................. �r j �r ir, /"�-T....... ........... IT- $DRAFFH �"`A '1'' 1,1`,"("l;,0 1(" AJ L I A N if 7�'Oil '11" ]`-['1 [JS I�N .......... "'KFO,=ZIMM/71 I T A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"N',A: 1-1 li-� i,ll, 0 1 "1"111 1"1 A-102 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 535 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS lob? 'What i*s Fair Housing'. IC.Que es la Vivie;ida Jiu-sta. 8 0 9 Fair Housing is the right to choose housing free from unlawful discriminwion. Lia vilvio'eincla 'ustia es el derecho a ele '1' "Vileirldo libre ,q,f r L)n a vi i de duscinprinacro"n ya quie es degialf. * It ensures access for everyone. Ase(. xceso pora toldc)'.(,;,,,, yt,iira iie/C It encourages neighborhoods to put out thei,r welcome mat. Aninio a ique en los veci,ncj(,ir-io,s porigon tyi topete ��de, 1.),�envelniido en (a entracky. It enhances our community's curb appeal, F,4 otrcsictiyo ick� nti,rA,stra co,n,-�ijni(jhr,,i1Cj, IMM 1,,U I I tc,,r,1,A,C,1"1 A-103 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 536 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Who 'is Protected by Fair Housing Laws"* oQuien Esta Protegildo plor lias Lies de Vivilienda Justa? PROTECTED CLASSES�, LAS LEYES S.E .APLICAN A., Anciestry, national origin Marital status ,,, 1, "1 E-1 I . .1 11 S to c(.,) C1 V1 ,As,cet'icrfeii�,ici'(�ll",��t,, picus c"e on,gen * Coltlzenship* W1110tary and Vieteran StatUS 0 it,�f d r�y iH.ci if-��i if"C"I""' Estado, r-r-�ifitcn�y de vieteranc) * Dislability, mental or Prirnary lianiguagie* P 11 Y,S i C la Idiornia princip:,if EX.5c''c7pocicku'J" Race, collor, * Agle Eidacl Religion * Familial status Religio"I") siffJoCio"n fliomiliar Sex, giender Gender."Identalty, genider Sex,C genierio... lexprie,ssion 1 F Sexual orientation ild,eintif.kid die,,cr-ie"neiro,, expresicin die y (),rientacio"ri sexual g6r),e4ir"c') G&net"ic information SOUrice of "income h)f6r7n,c.,,ici0`,n giene"tica Ft;ir�,,?ritie? do in,grasc),s lmmigr,atiMn status* Arbitrary factiors Estadio de inini�.j-w-icu.-i6i I Fac-tar-es ari.)itrarifc)s Covered under the Unruh Civil Rights Act,,which applies to most housing accornmodaions iri Califorr�ia r..)c),ir(cr Lt:,y L)Crc,�Chos C, Ld�irrjih,. ije�se, Cr 11,_� r1c:, o'vit.)nct,�7s eir� A,("I'l A-104 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 537 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS What Does Discrimination Look L*i 0 01 0 0 A COMO 4es la D i'sciriminlacion ke? Source lolf ncome Fuenfe de Ingresos Sex Gen er Sexol Genero 3 mom ACIA A-105 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 538 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01(� Ais�i,ALYSJIS Newsletter Website �Notices F�m ...... HOUSIN �O K,�S S logo ME OF NIL BE A PART OF REDUCING HOUSING DISCRIMINATION IN OUR COMMUNITY The San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing wants to hear about your experiences with housing discrimination issues and concerns. CLICK HERE to fill out an anonymous survey, and to participate in community workshops available through November 2019. Your participation and input are important to fair housing i'n our community UFA` SDRAFF"HI THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FAIR HOUSING A D A: 1-11 t_� 01 A-106 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 539 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01(� Ais�i,ALYSJIS 1111 . .........A1,11, ......... 1111111111 1111111111 .xo H 0 U SIN W 01", '' C I ............... 1111111 IS, I H,11101 ME IL "Fair Housing" laws prohibit discrimination in CLICK HERE to fill out an all aspects of housing, including home sales, anonymous survey, and to rentals, housing policies and financing. Each participate in community resident is entitled to equal access to housing workshops available opportunities regardless of race, color, religion, through November 2019. sex, national origin, disability/medical conditions, Your participation and familial status, marital status, age, ancestry, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender input are important to fair expression, source of income, or any other housing in our community. arbitrary reason. Be a part of reducing housing discrimination in our community! The San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing is conducting outreach on behalf of all the participating Cities including unincorporated San Diego County. We want SDRAFFH to hear about your experiences with housing THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL discrimination issues and concerns. ALLIANCE FOR FAIR HOUSING A A: 1-11 A-107 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 540 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Social Media Posts FAIR, H U , � O SING wmm��-"WORI<S'-HOPS ENGLISH 0 Twitter. • Housing discrimination happens, in your community. Have you experienced housing discrimination?You can help identify solutions: S I _,� "Ilvlww,sury ri'-)orike hU_N.(7,.L.(.JD y, ............................................................. .............................. • Help find solutions to housing discrimination in your community. Complete a brief survey: /-Ittp�.��Ilvlww,sury ri'-)orikey, I g ......................... 'D ----------- • Have you, your family or friends been affected by housing discrimination? Attend a community workshop to help identify solutions,: h=�s,,�'Ilwww.surv, onL�,.-S-- ,corr-0-15;DF airHot.j�s'n E n�,_- �J C L.,U ... -------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- 1' ��E 'D Instagram, Facebook, Nextdoor. o The [City/County] of[NAME] is part of the San Diego Regional A 1?1?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 A-108 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 541 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Alliance for Fair Housing, which is conducting outreach to address, housing discrimination issues, concerns and solutions. Your participation and input are important to Fair Housing in our community. Complete a brief s,urvey, and/or attend a community workshop. Learn more: h=�s,,�'Ilwww.s u ry onL�,.-S-- ,cor-r-0-ISDF airHot.j�s'n E n�'_- N C 1'.."U I'D ... -------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- E SPANISH 0 Twitter. • Hay dis,criminacio"n en la viviencla en su comuniclad. �Ha experimentado discriminacio'n en la viviencla? Usted puede ayuclar a identificar s,oluciones,: http5://www.surve.- monke cot-n1r1SDFairHou, anish y • Ayucle a encontrar soluciones, a la dis,criminacio'n en la viviencla en su comuniclad. Complete una breve encuesta: • �Ustecl, su familia o sus amigos han sido afectaclos �por discriminacio'n en la viviencla? Asista a un taller comunitario plara ayuclar a identificar soluciones: htt s://www.-surve m�on�ke�.co�m�IrIS�D�Fair�Ho�ti, anish Instagran, Facebook, Nextdoor. o La/El [Ciuclad/Conclaclo] cle �[NAME] forma parte de la San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing, que realiza programas cle alcance comunitario plara aborclar piroblemas,, cues,tiones, y soluciones de la discriminacio"n en la viviencla. Su �participacio"n y comentarios son importantes �para la igualclad en la vivienda en nuestra comuniclad. Complete una breve encues,ta y/o asista a un taller comunitario. Obtenga �ma"s informacion: htt s://www.-surve mo�nke c�omlrlSDFairHou, anish ArabIc 0 Twitter. im-51*1<4 ?�JLL.4"'21 0 L ih 4,1-'�_A UU 0 ha s://www.,surve monke �.coml�rlS�DF�air�Ho�u ra b ic J-3L%3I A 1?1?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 A-109 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 542 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS _�4 131U.C!"I I �-61X 4-12h j ��U jlz'%�L_Z6.� c5i L" 0 htt s.-11www.surve monke... �co�mlrlS�DF�airH�ou� rabic J&1.�Jor.. -tr J.4 0 ju �.tlL �.�i �_Jjj htt -s://www.,stirve monke com1r/SDFairHou, rabic Instagram, Facebook, Nextdoor. 0 N A M E C i ty/C o u n ty] I jo L<,.V I j L," I A---JL,-4 J_-,J' L.)A�,"l J�11 c J.�Uj I LDLLAVI L:�** ** LDI:� JA..*=4�t�JL"j a%AA" 'oj�l �4 13LLCL"l '�'W I AM 452S, L a J_&J.�JAX31 6� tAL J3 1r1,'3DF'aiH lousi'n�, :_.c.orn TAGALOG 0 Twitter. • Nangyayari ang cliskriminasyon sa pabahay sa ating komunidad. Nakaranas ka �na ba ng cliskriminasyon sa pabahay? Makakatulong ka s,a plagtukoy ng mga solus,yon: htt s://www.-surve mon�ke�.c�om�Irl�SD�Fai�rH�oti�, • Tumulong sa plaghahanap ng mga s,olus,yon s,a cliskriminasyon sa pabahay sa ating komuniclad. Kumpletuhin ang maikling s,u rvey: htt s://www.-surve m�on�ke�.co�m�lrlS�D�Fair�Ho�ti, • Naapiektuhan ka na ba, ang iyong plamilya o mga kaibigan ng cliskriminasyon sa pabahay? Dumalo sa �pangkomunidad na workshop, upang tumulong s,a pagtukoy ng mga solusyon: htt s://www.-surve mo�nke�.c�om�lr�ISD�Fa�irH�ou, Instagram, Facebook, Nextdoor. o Ang �[City/County] ng �[NAME] ay bahagi ng San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing, �na �nagsasagawa �ng pag-outreach uplang matugunan ang mga is,yu, alalahanin at s,olus,yon s,a cliskriminasyon sa pabahay. Mahalaga ang iyong plaglahok at saloobin sa makatarungang �pabahay sa ating komuniclad. Kumpletuhin ang maikling survey, at/o clumalo s,a A I?I?E r111111,1 D 1"'N',A: 1-11 A-110 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 543 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS pangkomunidad �na workshop. Matuto nang higit pa: bttp5:11www.surve-_-- monk�e .�cor�-nlr�ISD�Fa�irH�ou� CHINESE 0 Twitter. 0 bttp5://www.surve monke com1r1SDFairHou h in ese y ------y o t/A J Vj t k W 1 �l Mw F P 0,j f-T Mv iA�,Q A q i k v 0 71-1-c m z rm,ru 0 Ili A�P htt�.-I�lw�ww.�su�rve�m�on�ke�.c�om�Irl�SD�Fai�rHo�us�irr-) Chioes 0 1? P bttp5://www.surve monke com1r1SDFairHou h in ese y ------y Instagram, Facebook, Nextdoor. FtJ 4"'1 F r �_ t_r[ T-,"f I Mv Alp J7,p�rq PA Jrq P 0 v Eld, Eld, Flo a I r 9�J:Mo 0 _YPW Mv riml A-5 0 7,C MZ ppl r_u 0�, Ap iy f 0 H n Mp OF V-ft 0 T V-,Fri 1�N W : h t t a,a.-�//w�w w�.s�ur v�c m�o�nk e�.�co m�l r�IS D�F a�ir H�o u h it-)ese VIETNAMESE 0 Twitter. 0 P h a"%n b i e^t d6i x&v'e n h a"L &xa"y �ra tro n g c 0^n g d'o n g cu a q u y vi. Qu y-' vi da- bi"'t d'i x&v' n h chLra? Qu " vi co' g�p �pnai sLr pnan e o e a y the giup xa'c dinh cak gia"i phap�: htt s://www.-surve monke �comIrISDFait-Hou etnamese • Gi 'u'�pfi�mgiaipha'�pchopha%�nbi^etdo'ix&trongc^o�ngd'ongcua quy vi. Hoa'n tha'nh m6A cuo-c kha"o sa"t nga'n gQn: htt s://www.-surve monke �comlr/SDFairHou etnamese • Quy" vi I gia dNnh hoa-c ban beN cu"a quy" vi co' bi a"nh hv&ng b&i pha'%n bie^t d6i x&v'e nha"L & kho"'ng? Ha-ytham du ho^i tha"o c6ng A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: F" A-111 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 544 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 4N^ 4 dong de giup xac dinh ca"c gia"i pha"p: bttp §://www.survoymonkey.com/rISDFa/�rHo.0 etnamese Instagram, Facebook, Nextdoor. NA o �[Tha' nh pho'/Qua^nl [NAME1 la' mo-t phan cu"a San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair.Housing, lie^n �m.inh n Nay dang tie'n ha" nh tie'p ca^n f A� "A N 7. I f cong d'ong de" gia" i quy6t cac van de�, quan ngqi va giai pnap, d6i V&i iAt d1i p,ha^n b e o x&v'e� nha* &. SLr tham gia va* do"ng go"p y' kie'n cu"a qu' '? y vi �r6t quan trong d6i v&i �nha" c6ng ba'ng trong c6ng 66 n g c u a chu'ng ta. 115y hoa* n tha'nh kha"o s,a't nga'n gQn va*/hoa""c tham clu m M h^i th"o c^ng cl N^ -F o o a o ong. i m h ie^u th e"N m bttp5://www.surve monke com1r1SDFair.Hou etnamese A I?I?E r1111111 D A: 1-11 A-112 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 545 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C �Facebololk Ads Desktop Newsfeed Placement , I San Diego Regional Afflanice For Faw,Hausirg San Diego Regional Athance,For Fair Housing V r'.),�-'(so v la d YOU are arenlerni hoi7,iie1wvner,Tair hrousuir ,j rnatter,;-�la eveiryane, Fair Hotiisinig�s Me OgIV tO C-1100,Se 110L[slng rre TI'C'3171 U111a'AIL11 disc�1minat1k)n, Help us(de,11hTy balmer's le,fair�icuslng choic,'es and Jelerm,�Ine,SoKkIons to T�eall us,aboutyour rjou�,sing expeilences and Nielp,identry,sc,dutlons to rtousmg mamize thost.,bairie',rs discrinInaVon IFAIR .......... "j, .A HOUSING HOUSING SDRAFFH ........................................................... S U RVE Y.................................................. S URVEY........... d WON 31"A Fair Housi�ng Survey L earii i M o re Fair"Holusing,Survey Learia�!Mwire ire b�,c�prc.mde yfou�r uipuH C'Jh1c'K here'ira ClUl"si,i��veiy Vke (..'(-Mnm,9int 1"), Share Like "S lalf� 0 i, For Fair Housing 44* San Diego Reqiiona�Affiiaiii For Fair Like Page san Diego RegionW Allianice VNIR.&F I HI A r"'H JaruarI,'2,1 .I n u"' '1 .1 J, "wy 2"'1.t.8�0'AIPA, Ya!sea que usted sea un inquilino o tin propietario-�a vivienda jLl,.,-;'ta es La Vivienda Justa es e4derecho a el'egh'ILEna viviencla,11bre,de u7i,poila,flte para lados AyCideflos a identificar las barre;ras para las opcionfes disrarinihad6ii.Cu-�nten,oS SLIs expe'riein,das�de vivienda y ayiddeIrics a de vivienda juMa y determinar lassolud,ones para,-ninii-Nzar esas barrei as. deiritifl,cai'-soliucN.,mes a[a discri r ii'Anach--5n efl la vivilencla.Haga dic aqLfi pai"a completar Ili-lestra enc-u-esta', littp,"S"I Ir'Up'"U''T. E N C.,;"I WJ El"S"I A SOBREII VIVIENDA i u,ocv,rA E;�1,4TC U E S"I"A SOME' VIVIENDA SDRAFFH' JU S TA-—------------------------- En.cuesta.Justa Sobr�e Viv'ienda Hap dic aqu�"para dw SU OP11119611 L eam M o rp 121, 10 h, WhI I 0 2 hares Like S I III n III P f".."eojale R%aid,ttqd Engaiqerrier4s f.y rr n""1 11-[1 or Q i��F 1 11 1 o A 1?1?E 1`1111111111 D A: 1-1 i-� 1,1, 0 1 "1"111 1"1 A-113 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 546 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-114 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 547 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Outreach Tool Kit - Fair Housing Rights Brochure A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-115 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 548 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C For m�o,re'*i,�nf',o,r,iiii,at�i�on and assistance with V* fair housun please SD,R,AFFH cointact th4 ?"illowing TH,E S A N D I E(30 'R E('310N, A I. 4 ALLTANCE FORFAIR HOUSING organizationis seirving Sm Diego County. 4 ................... I...........'A"IR), C5A Son Diego,County "WWW"'C54morg, H'' 0 US 1�N G Serving flie,Glies of:Onda Vis�-,o,El Cajon, R LG Hl''T 011,31 !"J"a"fion"al Gly,La AMsa, and 0,ile Coi.nity of San Di�eqo LegalAt"I'd Sotiery of San Milego WWWJ01$�s'd`!.'0'rq 5a.,irvirig Orie C'Oies,J�Corlsbcid, 1)611 Mair wale"15" Scoo � KI Enc E d""10" I Beaek,totrion Grove,C)ceort�idp,,Roway, Vivkj'Mlvd the,-oulnty of San Diego I I MINE Which Housing Providersare, Sub'iect to Flai'ir Housings Laws",?. Thetaws applyto: 1�irokieis�13rlid and de'oldiCip'c�"rs Oo�enz.,r r4'�nve�,�irvlero�rmope,�'Hes �&Skd'axti&jiin�q nnochal, Cirld nirar"kief rig ,rhe law prolvi"bils diiscrismilinatilo,n iti,all asp,lects of fliv lip, Rein�tin,q or IV`k,'.'�il,cigie unid i P M d 5�S Lht,� C] 11 s't C"V'+L'�'1:0 ve r#a il,s WIN M A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"N',A: 1-1 i-� 1,1, 0 1 "1"111 1"1 A-116 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 549 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Para ma"s informadid5n y ayud�a con la vlwienda jpstai por favor contaicte con las, siguientes SD,R,AFFH IT H E S A[4 D I E(.,,30 'R E(;,3`10 N A L organizacloines que ALMANCE FORFAIR HOUSING 'IF si,iven al condad�I de 0, San D'iegol. D E R E C 110 A, `L,'V',N A— www.,cs4morg V`VIIEND�A CSA.Co,ndodo de Son Dieq* `3T A ............ sirvieri�d,o,0 fic)"s de.,-�Ckula Vistu, LJ C-ai6n,�,,Iahorxfl Oy,L11:1, 50,n�,ee, y ed rcmdradi de,San Uiego Legal Aid Soeielity,of,San Dsego wwwJ01$,$,d,I,,0rq Sirkhipri&)a kM CiUdadez�dfa,C1ads,,bw,--1, Cio,roinucto,Del Mai,ErkrinOcn,Esicznli F"c),vii,pc,�yl,Sark Diegio,Sun MIci,III Solaria B,each,I y el,,ondirjd,,�cfe Sctri[,Aeqo ,Ou,e" Proveedores de"Viviendia Estion Sulietio im las Leyes de Viviendo Justim? Los,lc�-yes s,e aplican w. Opmodorc,,,,�S,, y eaqc-n,��I,,-,s Vic, lisl4a,cl,,, Can re4m; cxciriistruicc6in wsras, do ChOr"13"113 y X 0%,jer6c.-n die rivem�id� GOrtnt0s Che die "Los,'Inedhos"-fe'p,�,t b I,�(1-1 1�'d, ,�l,kv�,,,cqen,ck,,,is dic [m,"A"'Adidall 1,7,kms,ernpreiins de, 41k cie qi� vendc'n sio,wIns pura pmp,�110,(jric,s C,inqui III ft,,crs �La tey proliyibe,Im distrimirkfati6n,entvdps los, ospectios de,lavivieli,,ido, orriv nicfurnieMr� MIR hJpulecanovy wgwrcn,,� h",u(2 i I e,I ili b yl,� A 1?E r"11,11,111 1)1"N'L A: 1-11 i-� 1,1, 0 1 "1",1"t ",kC,1[1 A-117 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 550 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Outreach Tool Kit - Fair Housing Display Boards What i*s Fa*ir Hous*ing7. lip, "Vi "i'le,n,ld'a, J,u,stal .Guielo i la V1 110 Fa'Ur Housing is the right to choose Is hous'Ing free from unlawful disicr'I'milnicifion. 11 1. ilustia i en I dicl,rielcho a (,%1 1 1 C-19 F 1,l U 1110 Y F V I I Oil)dfir','I I'llibire., 011j"I r(] qUieesilegiall. It ensu�res access for eve�ryone. Aseligural el alicicesio plara todil It encourages ne"Ighborhoods to put out their welcome mat. Aninia cy rquie erk /als lye-,Ch'idis piongion urt topete diE.-,&bienvenidal CU"',Cy" It enhances our commun�41ty's ic�urb appeal. Aumento iel licti'vol cle ii-�iiulestra M L Popp A I?I?E r"111111111 D A: 1-11 A-118 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 551 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS Who 1*S Protected by Fair Hous*ing Laws'. I 0 Est" Protegildo, por l�as Lileyes ide Viv` vien a endia Justa'?m PROTECTED CLASSES, U.S .LEYES 5EAPLICAN A;�, kaciesfiry, inicfliional� origi,�n� Mimrilol� stiall us (IF, CIP"'If, P11 Es!%'Idw c-i'vili'l ly Cll'ltill'ze�nshj 11 p Mild['Iltiary and W:%,tiermn Sl['ialvs cJ1.)1d(7r,�,J1 ICI Eslrjcic� ryi�,Ufor y 1[>irsidbililty, irniein�tal air 1��,11"'i irn a y I,a in g t.j a ig le �p)hysica I pf"11"nir."I,P101 Dim,�Ipociidnrlid, rn�e'rvctf(:),f I I C, IR,aice, 0011[air Age RIC17.1ZO, E rdo ir:l hi iii minillial Status Re4ig,46`111 Siftmm-,,,�6,n fcirni/ii�,-,w Slex, genider ,G le in id le ir.ill d le ii'11"i ty, ig,e�ii i,�d e ir ganierc,�._, expriessibri V Siexuial oriii'&n�,l a 11`11110 111 hJ(-ri cl r.,le (9x ��. 1� .1 IN Pir"ID/ Clif. OrientocliC3,11 SP3,X111UL,I,,( ,J,inie �,t .. ;rin Gleinetilic I'�iniflo�iii'm�ll[Tiat�ii,o�ilI Sovirce of, ir"vcaime Inifi,:)ir-irnio,cion I�P,5 ir)5, stial us* 16 Arbitrary factors Es�cxlo(.�,J& orbitrcirilos Covered under the'Unruk CivA Rights Act,which applies to mo.o kousing occoirnirnc�datioins in California m Ell m A I?I?E r1111111 D 1XL A: 1-11 t_�l i i,t 0, 1 "1"13% 1"1 A-119 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 552 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS What D,oes Discrimination Look L*ike?,, 00, 0 wo 12 SIC0,M10 es ilia D,I"Si�citm'ioiln,li"',niacii,ol,ipil,, Sourice of nclome Fuente de ilia Ingresos I Sex/ Gender sexo/ Genero _rammim/ A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-120 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 553 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL I 11%1�[ 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS 0F'1M'Pt,,'DJ,`N1E� INTER-ACTIVE ACTIVITY- WHAT DOES DISCRIMINATION LOOK LIKE? INSTRUCTIONS. Participants are enco�uraged to come up and spin the arrow on the "What �Does Discrimination Look Like?" Board. Participation can be encouraged through swag giveaways. Step 1: Each participant will spin the arrow on the board (see board game spinner example below). Step 2: Once the arrow lands on one of the identified protected classes within the circle, the facilitator reads the associated "Example" text below and asks, the participant "Is, this discrimination?" Step 3: After the participant responds, the facilitator then reads the "Support" details, to provide Fair Ho�using legal info�rmation. A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"N",A: 1-11 A-121 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 554 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS �Fair Housing - �Protected Classes �Examples: PIP &EX/GENDER A young woman asks about renting an Und�er Fair �Holusing laws, apartment, but the landlord tells her there are it is illeg�al for housing no avail�able apartments. �Ho�wever, an hour providers to later, when a yolung man asks about renting misrepresent the an apartment, the same landlord informs the availability of housing white woman abo�ut two availabl�e apartments. based o�n protected Is this discrimination? characteristics like sex/g�ender. SOURCE OF A fam�ily with a rental subsidy locates an Many Fair Housing laws I�N C 0�M��E available apartment but the building's rental make it unlawful to manager tells the fam�ily that the landlorcl discriminate based on does not accept any//programs"and suggests lawful source of income, they look elsewhere for housing. Is this including the use of a discrimination?. housing subsidy. �RACE A �Latino family meets with a real estate broker Under Fair Housing laws, abolut purchasing a home in a suburban it is illegal for housing community that happens to be predominantly providers to steer white. Instead the broker recommends homes individuals into or away in two communities which are predominantly from certain buildings, Hispanic. The agent tells the family that they parts of buildings, or will likely be "mor�e comfortable" in thiese neighborhoods to colm m u n ities. Is this discrimination segregate populations. NATIONAL The president of a condominium board Under Fair Housing laws, ORIGIN discloses to a white resident that he refuses to it is illegal for housing rent or sell apartments to Asian Americans providers to refuse to because"their food is too,smelly" and it might rent, sell, insure or offend others in the building�. Is this finance housing, or discrimination? refuse to negotiate for housing, or otherwise make housing unavailable based on race or national origin. AGE A new rental building advertises available Under Fair Housing laws, apartments as being perfect for young it is illegal for housing professio�nals. While taking a to�ur of the providers to advertise or available units, an elderly prospective tenant make any statements that A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 A-122 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 555 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS R jjj� JAR is to�ld by the leasing agent, "This apartment indicate a pre�fere�nce, building was really clesigned to meet the limitation, or lifestyle needs of yo�unger single people with discrimination based on lots of amenities g�eared to help,today's age. millennials socialize. Is this discrimination?. �FA M I�L I A�L A single woman with three children apipilies to Under Fair Housing laws, STATUS rent a two-bedr�ololm apartment and she is told it is illegal to establish that no more than three people can reside in overly restrictive, their two-bedr�o�o�m apartments. Is this occupancy standards that di's c r"i mi'n a ti'o n? discriminate against families with children. RELIGION A Muslim man arrives home to discover that a Under Fair Housing laws, racial and relig�io�us slur has been spray- it is illegal for housing painted acr�oiss hiis apartment cloor.The tenant providers to harass or fail asks his building superintendent to repair his to take, corrective, action door. The apartment manager refuses to do regarding complaints so. Is this discrimination.9 about racial or re�ligious harassment. DiSARILITY An elderly Deaf man he his nursing home if Under Fair Housing laws, they wo�uld provide an ASL interpreter,so,thiat it is illegal for housing he can communicate with his in-holuse providers to refuse to medical team on days when they meet with provide a reasonable him. The nursing home refuses citing the accommodation by added expense as the reason for refusing his altering rules, policies, 0 no 0 0 request. Is thi's aiscrimination? practices, or services for persons wl.th disabilities when such an accommodation is needed for effective communication so that the housing can be fully L-Ysed and enjoyed. A I?I?E r1111111 D 1"'K,A: 1-11 i-� i i,i,('"':0 1 1,,RF�IACIA A-123 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 556 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS ACTIVIDAD INTERACTIVA— (,sC0M0 ES �LA DISCRUMINACIGN9. INSTRUCTIONS: Se invita a �los participantes a acercars,e y girar �la flecha del tablero "�Co'mo se ve la discriminacio"n?. ". La participaci6n puede fomentarse a trave's de regalos. �Paso 1: Cada participante hara' girar la flecha en el tablero (ver ejernplo del tablero ma's abajo). P�a�so 2: Una vez que la flecha aterrice en una de las clases protegiclas id�entificad�as d�entro del cl'rculo, el facilitad�or lee el aviso asociado a, continuacio'n y preg�unta al participante "6E,s esto discrim�inacio'n?. Pa�so 3: Despue's de q�ue el participante responda,, el facilita,dor lee la info�rmacion en cursiva para pro�porcionar informacio"n legal adicional sobre la vivienda justa. A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D A: 1-11 A-124 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 557 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS �Fair Housing - �Protected Classes �Examples: SEXO/GENERO U�na joven pr�eg�unta sobr�e el alquiler de Segon las leyes de un apartamento�, pero el propietario l�e vivie,ndajusta, es ile�gal dice que no hay apartamentos que los proveedores de disponibl�es. Sin embarg�ol, una hior�a ma"s vivienda mientan sobre la tarde, cuando un jolven pregunta sobre el disponibilidad de alquiler cle un apartamento�, el mismo vivie�ndas basa-ndose en propietario informa a la mujer blanca caracterl'sticas protegidas sobre dos apartamentos disponibles. 6Es como e/sexo/ge'nero. esto discriminacio"n? �FU�ENTE �D�E U�na familia co�n un subsidio de alquiler Muchas leyes de, vivie,nda INGRESOS, local�iza un apartamento d�ispoinible pero justa establecen que es el administrador de alquileres del edificio i1ega1'cfiscn*m1'nar e�n le dice a la, familia que el propietario no funcio"n de la fuente legal acepta, ningu'n "programa"' y le sugiere de ingresos, incluido, e/ que busque una viviencla en otro lugar. uso de un subsidio de I �Es esto discriminacio'n� vivlenda. to �RAZA U�na familia latina se reu"ne con un ag�ente Se,gu"n las leyes de, de bienes rai'ces para co�mpirar una casa viviendajusta, es ilegal en una comuniclad suburbana que resulta que los proveedores de ser piredominantemente de gente cle raza vivie,nda dirijan a las blanca. �El agente recomiencla casas en personas hacia ciertos dos comuniclades que so,n edificiosl parte�s de preclominantemente hispanas. �El agente e�dificios o vecindarios le dice a la familia q�ue es probable que para se�gregar a las se sientan "ma's co'mo�do�s" en estas poblaciones. I comuniclades. 6Es esto discriminacio"n? PAIS, DE ORIGEN �El presidente cle una junta cle Se,gu"n las leyes de, conclominos r�evel�a a un r�esidente bl�anco viviendajusta, es ilegal que se niega a alquilar o vender que los proveedores de apartamentos a perso�nas cle orig�en vivie,nda se niegue,n a asia"tico�-americano�s po�rque "su comicla alquilar, vender, asegurar huele mucho, y podria olfender a otrois o financiar una vivienda, 0 en el edificio�. Es esto discriminacio"n? que se nieguen a n�egociar para obte�ne�r una vivie�nda, o que de otra manera no se pueda acce�der a una vivienda por motivos de raza s de origen. EDAD U�n edificio nuevo anuncia apartamento�s Segu-'n las leyes de de alquiler co�mo perfectos para jo*'lvenes vivie,ndajusta, es ile�gal profesionales. �M�ientr�as se lleva a cabo un que los proveedores de recorrido plo�r las uniclades dis onibles, el vivie,nda anuncien o h A I?I?E r"11,11,111 D 1"'N',A: 1-11 A-125 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 558 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS representante del edificio le dice a un declaraciones que poisible inquilino cle eclad avanzada, "Este indiquen una preferencia, ed�ificio cle apartamentos fue realm�ente limitacio"n o discriminacio-n disehado, para satisfacer las necesidades basada en la edad. del estiloi cle vida cle los jo"venes solteros coin muchas comoldidades orientaclas a ayuclar a la generacio"n mil�enial cle hioy en d'i'a a socializar. Eis esto discriminac'n? 10 0 SITUACION U�na muier soltera con tres hijois solicita el Bajo las leyes de vivienda �FA M I�L I A�R alquiler cle un apartamento cle clos iqualitaria, es ilegal habitacioines y se le dice que no pueden establecer normas de resiair mas cle tres persoinas en sus ocupacio'n demasiado apartamentos cle clos habitacioines. ',Es restrictivas que discriml*nen esto aiscriminacion? a las familias con hijos RELIGION U�n hombre musulma"n l�leg�a a casa y Se,gu"n las leyes d,.. clescubre que un insultoi racial y rielig�ioisoi viviendajusta, es ilegal ha sidoi pintado, con spray en la, puerta cle que los proveedores de su apartamentoi. E,l inquilinoi le pide al vivie,nda acosein o dejen geriente del edificio que arregle el claho a de tomar medidas su puerta. E,l administraclor del correctivas en reilacio"n con apartamento se nieg�a a hacerloi. -Es estlo las quejas por acoso racial discriminaci,O"n?. o reiligioso. DISCAPACIDAD En el asilo para personas cle la tercera De acuerdo a lais leyes eclad, un anciano sordo pide que l�e de vivienidai iguailitairia, proporcionen un inte'rprete de sehas es ileigal qiue los de ASL para poder comunicarse con piroveieidores de viviendai su equipo me"clico del lugar los di"as se nieguen, a 'I. El asilo cle en que se reunan con e piroplorcionar uniai ancianos se niega a clar este servicio adaptacion razonalDle menci�onando el gasto adicional como alterando, las normas, la razo'n para rechazar su solicitud. *Es piolfticais, priaicticas o esto, discriminaclon servicios para lais personas coni discaiplaicidad cuanido dichiai aidaptaicio"n, sea, necesariai para una . Ir comunilcaclon eficaz de modo que lai vivienda plueda seir utilizaida y disfrutaida pileiniaimente. A I?I?E r"111111111 D 1"N',A: 1-11 i-� i i,i,('"':0 1 1,1111`��'ACIA A-126 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 559 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Appendix F: �Proof oIf Posting Website EMBUSINESS cIrry HALL 'Cil"i SlER'ViCES 110100i'll 010 L", Fail Housing Community Workshop FAIR HOUSIING, ............. D U C D 13" COM f", for wp�rmyrilmiljp�wr Wowpi;O'llops III ulivirwerMlilf Avg,1640 "I I IM l �f': "I son[HeIlli,CA 91,101% Y",I ',;I 000 10bac is Parr Take,thr!"I'limewy l;ii""f '�Jl A l'/""��a i"i E04iii1kii.HIBUSkIYG OPP011,1TUN!"11"Y il"', frf i�' "i, N'o l'�'u 161il 1" 1 ll 1,l 'A'p'�"''l 11 l j ol""�f ""j", �",4 't,o rn�'l'h"i'v U lo/ Orl M"'�,l 14"R;�'�,,i p�'� ii 1"i'j I"""J""Old 11(M�F'"t""C",�'IJ�'lv� f'lil� puil lig q J�j'�'6'j l"y' e 2C") 119 D 1 P Y,i 14 Fair //,//////1!fr/famylow FAIR�HOUSING FA I"FRt NEW! HOUSING, WC),R,,K"S171 0 p IS flirl,'%,(�I �,Ipjl�;piiml Nbarw o Ini Fmir WA*Hl��v,�coiirkhv iirilg colhewhou Lfeh-A[ill(�,ji-iilyvif%,Rlo Mwwi riii �fllle,p,i# r0fiijlh�ig Ur"M I�mili I 5,iirt/[),li:Vp C ""PDRiM I I vwqwl(')�, lw�p ilit"i I[,o'yi�vv I, Prj�)&Vlliiilu e�mrall,hrluarhp fm l,vrirf,�i trwiwi�.ir', "ll'-.m Pta,�i�/v,.r� ar irq%�i'iul i�I'lz�'fim fw I i"r III ruli'm q)w Ar'ifjkylsi��ol tc�lr�o/60QPVV�')�'11 'r('plX'f)i�I' as Ill i le A i"�'ury'��lo'l by A il,� iix/�"�Ilry rrilii�I nr,")rrnr'in r�4x�k(�pq IT I in, 01),l uflk'r Ow brli"ll',anni m,p"lcvvI"1r inpli'��"Oxxo 0,11ir H?"�llnlllg ll��he'Sol 1 r(q'q'l,,ij'rpar hr- I M m l'OMH(I�'rr�Iry I iu,oir,flm irn,A�hoirhi k oilif�r�fti,ap,d'�p umi,J I I`,rviill"unialirr,ibri,V,liii�I im riifrijp�Pur,@, cia Nfin m w�f lmlli(I J((;Ax t�A"'o t',(,�ie�,w rve�,,y H-'�w h eli kwir pi ii li", take the Surivy r" "v"o'ylhe'',uuve�y n'I'Allitu",pleal:�"'e w0itt it,im mr,aq fi'rii�twu btt�("rs" ........1'i")"f ho" 1"rid"AwliRtumid,�Iir nwoll_'irif'l 'hv'mppir�j"'Illialf"Wlk Ptirrij,'I""'Lil PC'A�'a,� q""/""y"ij,I0 i r"' I egat Aid Siocirly of San DJ�eglo and North Coujnty P�prwrnur"iew po"'olirilopl, �o hv�jp A,T ir�pilpi q-j r'll-Om'd Uirld", xn,l fimw,,uni,y ..........If, i'.",I C-IA A 1?1?E r"111111111 D 1"N',A: A-127 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 560 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS ----------- lllmped�meriits,to,Fair HlcusIingi Holus0ig CtiolCe$1 a IN Lq E 3 m�11 51 11-1 1,1'�lll Al Fair Housing ......................... %up,(T�o I "�),Ae", Arxcjiv�Ifivg v m aPT4 Pvd,erM�ffws,mo"'rw It* ag T/v "Olv'",gst,�,"y/,X','A,"K C"W'd 6o�a)vwwry�AVUIMN� p�rv,,v/,,'/,(k� otly uw,,,/�,4fl""f,5 HSA M',�V)UV VIJIA,,,�ME,VH,,,Z4 gerwmc r[I"M r,')4vw"(t a)r"�� 3 4 4, d�),A, Y V',/�� ""Y/ ra,'xi,mll Ipol', ""'A""',zet,w/') �m'l YdKMV,5� AME, 31 A 0,S D eT� W', ,�d�,re 15,D'a;�iwrvwmnt ol H 0 wri�ri a n 1,1,UfIb an Caw fou�e,�uf�niqvr,,m n,a i�d 2"A '0 1 01//re,,jusdl,,'_ �j,ACI"S 00,11,101 r*umurcc,"'p a"p"a�:,f �,e-,;"a ""(5 aVU ilvS 0 V A w I ifrje�, R C 11"), As,s"'s,ba nce, YnImq'70 Cwll,,M"'d I err,�,,M Gv"","fo V'Wum,,�Ivy avei'dl!��N4v7,'a W10&.160 W 4,004pRA dAfff0A,#4,AAlJbls!u,w We haulalrIj I�WOf,,V40t0m1g,;bhd gniiwfAll"nWIFIMMS, f ......... Ii�jv H hx,I t,I inf Aj,�, I'vil Fair Hotisingi Survey f��o,i,�f,,nu w,�S�v IL In k�L, oo b,ww onr �F I 'A10,6'�J%Or,PI'TWl`W'ft`rIr', F"'f'r Hroo,"p"w"t F'ilvvu,�1�('Ink�,V,i Powr Kll,effm)� LwA Y'our 15�prvl("�,v LaA, Aw�lpt,))�� I T0,0 wo tMow-A R#q*oom Allil)�4,huno lov F Aol H4"4f'ftKA W104006f 4��*vOATAO COUNTY1`00USCEINTER "Jf f,N f 1�V I U If 1� M I I"N"Y Y,L U".4 AT V'l,'Ll ................................................................................................................................. 4 1 1 > jjjjjjjjjjjjjfffffffffffff Fair'Housing '43 0% C,� ...... do, Vwv,Hfou'kIng IMN, ov,A f�,v a vw ft v--,,x u 0 f"fp oom) fff �r Pomf**voolliff1q,mfommq YA mwm/w axfl,�aow, V,�,'A/""0 ff"ff),YMjlfMl MW,10,r,v/��1%00(14 "'I"'pw u p Aft'Iffifill Vf�V-Y WWW"A"P ("em)u �,fl,�-/(ol),%lkl Irv,r)mAm—1 0, )WAY 0 ip )jf"""umm",m) T� P", ff;4 j�,41�','f �";A""'q (q, q( g .............. )v W, 1 1,X I I 0 A-128 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 561 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01(� Ais�i,ALYSJIS Social Media 7:10 6 4, 914 691% .............. ........ C �ay rV E9 t�ay,),,n Yhe 61 I&Y OY Oprmrrm 01dry p4o W 4)W,,,, City of'Chula Vista i", Government w-"a 104 About j r, C XF w V U r r(f y l�"u''Y rl o mf �8 p'j, a rw j;wv"'A aw,cu,s�"'�'l ru 7 �"i�D'P'A jrx"�Np"ntf'04 sr"'I"Alinwm'�"dx"ro'!Oum nwp a t 4 A Oty of B Cajon, ARA Id"P/', )�Wl UP," �R"Q tv The City of Chula Vista is,partaf the San Diego Reg,ionai Alliance for Fair Prists t I IV N Housing.We are conducting outreach SD RAFFH to gather information to address NIxf), 011fi"Gcr, ("I P 1q'M-reamspei'll A111ldN(T FOR P�AIIR housing discrimination issues, F A.I R concerns and solutions.Please complete a brief survey to provide your HOUSI NG paps k'�w "41,F4"' 1) input. z>Cz. C '514,001hearl's of ll;,*�nq 106 r"J*ill J'N ORN pin 11,11,01 TM,Mill 'A lk'n j Ry jj"Is RMI'Aft"d NqcN El Cj4an,CA LocmO Cv�'lymznmrrt' 8:r 2 qpzl 19 f(sclebook ,77 E VC Evw ---------- City of San Diego 4 tirs-0 FAIR %f*r*l&h4jJ H ave yo u,you r fa mi ly o r f riends been krfi) Day llAfly affected by hiousing discrimination? �""fyvv 5��' Help uis find solutions by completing a bhef survey at l'),�tt��.),4,��,j�,'I..�y/'�1,2�N�p',,e'�.-,ia f. t"'l IA'W'F!,w".Jww"5�A Fl,',iar Kxjswi�Wrjfkshop 7 flhw hk"1141Q'110"f��fl' v�l ii PINI-r�'("N'l HII'T Hop Ntvmryj�[�11 il"Pal"'Y' 3'�1'41"�' 4P, 20 �'4j'�,qth Bimsad'v%,vy E,,,1Xw1l1,,,,�,,,1u Cjl, Ahoifl h"'i qirn OLD 13 3 Comments-3 Shares ........................................... L(".AM�'AXNA"All I'lip'I'd"W"('11 11M'NxM� flal.hhll' REI Sm�Dfjqi,ijr'�RW"jynm,,Y)h Marvol,kv, avt cwi NcivefMwO I G Spurisoired 1-0 is hcall in L;w/'mrfdMn and 6,11KI pi n 1�0 bl'(�)U pin Vl�'Ja t"N lave Rfm-q�"Wlllne%'urqo�y if tl'0-�jp.344",ufllandt�"" n ov"d A[1)1?E r111111111ill 1)1"N',A: 1-11 i-� i,,,t 0 1 "1",1"t A-129 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 562 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01(� Ais�i,ALYSJIS 01,1MM,,'(1)],"NIE� 9:35 8 111;�A a 5C%") 6, .................. NC:= killCouncil President Georgette C c'U"nc 0 P r le 5 I'd,@ n t'<3'eo ir ek I lte�tlb rn ez Ask,GmuirieHJ F teqkli�ttt G36foid!"I G6mez 0(',�t 131 a t"1 2 7 FP M-0 ��WT'"�PMSIQH�TIU�MlrC PIkICIA, 0 ks* Y, 'G"'Ajrf�I NeAfrf)ry"'W"Ne Ir"04"'t The City of San Diego wantsto hear Cr"Arripme a su"rivey 2 m��,rvrk ho,,qp F mb� Ajoac from you to fight housing discrimination.Complete a survey&/or ("]dry��+e�ghls("'T� attend a,workshop,.For info: Council President 4�'�'iCJ6 Lhntvemily Nov%N E40 G�eot"geltic,,,G,6,n,'i,ez'1 Ni(,',)vfw V3�5A�5 741)5,p, N'A'V*�rcua P�aw V AplalknoNn x'' ary /fa i rh ou S�I'l g/a 51ita N"I"wkRt st" A Oct 30�6-8p fuNperdiments fc��Fair Hott'sing I Conoratinily Devek7pinent Stuck City Heights Ctr Grairt Prograirn 11 Cfty of San Dio,ga 0111ficial Website &S Atio w�t 43011.5 University Ave,#640 LA 4,(-5 EAV o�'Sv*ln Nov 13 5,45—7,45p Valencia Park/Mal'colm X Library bkz 5148 Market St. Palo Txmrwsparfm-�Y .. ..... ...... ..... �4' :"WIA "f,�'A"�4"� Pmiflrh('�*1�Y'oa sUc(p incmntr 's��N''n Clev* r I's JI-oul'I�Jilne 2:"'j 7 9:3 5 6 "i�"A Q e59% t4p 010 FoHoot A Slhuxro, Council President Georgette 04, 00,cearnOde,GovernrrW9,10 G61rnez Oct,1,',31 at"1,27 PM- "Iry 01,(00, a nrsk�e�s pwl of tl,`*,ars Di,ieio R e w coW AM r1arce f cor F air 0 C ItA Nj 1 E' 'rtw r �9 F1'ou "140,11"'A ki cond"ac"t]rV OiAYE 101 IND,ailckess Pvrxus�rq.','� The City of San Diego wants to hear [�i and 'V"(.xn from you to fight housing 4'c)#".z'iJrq(11n,alur a t"x�'finf discrimination.Complete a survey Vor City of,OceansWe- m"'fe C';�ral! attend a workshop,,For info: 77,he C�ty Ooear*jde,Cak15cm'r4a I i"t"t p s'H w wvv.s a n d i e g o.g o Wc,d g 'E"A,I R 1),)s ricxo rr,�� wa�e e /f a i r h o t,i s�n g/a i "",,,an Do r) L,as, HOUSING Q111 U R NVE Y Oct 30�6-,8p Ci'ty Heights�Ctr Posts E'vaamna,s, com,munity 430,15 University Ave,#640 Nov 13 15,45—7,45p 1"J I A ?rx"'cip"e, Valencia Park/Malcolm X Library Job,IS .... 5148 Market St. 0 d AbMit APA, S 1/,,)1),,")PLI, A I?E r'11111111il 1)1"'K,A: 1-11 i_� i,,,t 0 1 "1",1"t]��'/k'("1[1 A-130 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 563 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 01C Ais�i,ALYSJIS �News �Media a Fair hoill'sirig Cornirnurnity worksh,(.�ps comiing Io City of San Diego to educate consumers about fair housing practicies. ........ �ru,pf M C-u, A A `/p/m/0, (g m" ""nm's r"'m/rxrD�Irnms"'r, nemgf �,rrd,rwv()v I""m"a, .............. c`lf-�, b/ w Pm,a v1p �rwn�1".1 rt db�vtm-�"rl�wr,,�t,Kfr","n d�,,q Y rv,-4 omr, o"",c o Ivvr, v 0,%,,WO, v"110's n,/,J,'-,(a, r, 10-......... w", R."',4,114""""01V TO"t I, L 1, n/ z, n V "o'),j k",", 1"', NbAvv :"0,1�xr"wL4", 0 V AA oO-,"'an, I A,1 64,-- I............ fof� e��s�n'50""Af C�,JWMM NVOWN, V,-1 Attend Santee'Fal"T''Housing ,I........1,",1" )NS"T i" V:S �j Workshopis, Take Survey Twor(1,vAsv Nnow if "TIn VVIIIIi"A" i 14m,t V,,a vvr�,rx"Irmolft Tiii,1"", n, W"/`�J'I",t, 1,4 hic (F ,W/ M�j E=M 1"Fr 0, t(I 1"'I v f ir,1,1,tv a Off f1i 1'411e� AM, F77,777)7,"'777';-'---- ir A,Hj,M`m"e rot NOW 0 NO,f"qm U ,e 4,SlAtAr"rtlo, Q/4 Which Saniv I 'J, workstwips I lbrolagh,N(Arej aber'�oiifoj ii.)l tiend a warkshop to II Jtxmo 14 0 o"S'I'la J1 ,�m6ry' oil 11 dCATS-S, f Ff%,4,q"1irjdi1d(A, vii"orUk's"I"wop viclinoc with,ro"ir Oceansi,,de's, Faip,r Housing I,If t'J',//,�V, ff*',#1"P k,&,,,j(,S','(,,I,,?r-1#,f1',,1� o A a i�I i�,-,/q,",i t`h if,m o'A I A",f,',f#f''�'�," Workshop November 7' k"', 'u,�w&u%,III vt 4!C "f 'v,'N x'tin,,1� I t 11�1� 1,1,1 f�l 1 4 m vp Pw j,"40 AW 64,0 0 ly 42 'p �rw 6,1 A 11, �w�tlivir t."Aa K"1,1,��,�c�fi r,",,,i�""(",i�,,,j, v ri I ......... tl t YI 3"'rq;v)e"'m/41�n I, I,"(mv,r I,Pv 0"'g, 'r%'/,',/ "d I ....../�Jjvo�rrI� 'Np"'umA 11)Tm,�,-,m,�dIp""'I"e""", '49,",46-Ap"d V 10)", ow'-Ahl",M,/M,� A �pIu',Iln,,�, tl'�-,,,,w Lw.....-'bJ,,1,)1"p,a","o, I P"d", "t ivi i� fir,(1,"litry 1� 0,I)I :s�uIr $1,188 FIR QWMI�vWm* F1 ho""",vu f&,11'w"', 6fi('"'k,�fl,�,�,,,,v�",frlr�ll�evf,�,;)�,,]�,l�,,��,,,,�7"fh,,,�q",),tfpo",",,�,,,Il�,�,11,f("116,��"(,I,�,�o,,,Jwp,,,11,�,,,�i��,,�",f!t&�,,,,w,,, Oct,aps,We Is,FIair Hoo;sdng,Wcprkshoj�,o YNovelifibe'r 7 A[1)1?E r111111,1 D 1"N',A: 1-11 i-� 1,1, 0 1�"I",1"t]��,"kC,1[1 A-131 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 564 of 768 DlniJ moll XTA mulll kwmul� T.XIL 11E�,D H ,,D,A,,,, -D. AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS To FAIR HOUSING CHO�ICE Lending Summary by jurisdiction Table B-1: Disposition of Home Loans urisdiction Total Applicants Percent Approved Percent Denied Percent Other' j 20�12 20�17 2012 1 20�17 1 2012 2017 20�12 20�17 Carlsbad Government '741 349 7 5.7% 79.9% 11.5% 6.6(y(,) 12.8% 13.5% Backed Purchase Conventi.onal 2)862 3)488 79.1(Yo 74.3% 9.5(Y(,) 8.7(y(,) 11.4% 17.0% Purchase Refinance 121858 41573 73.4% 62.1% 12.9% 15.9% 13.7% 22.0% Home 268 584 71.6% 62.8% 17.9(Y(,) 18.0% 10.4% 19.2% Improvement Total 16)729 8)994 74.5% 1 67.6% 12.3% 12.9% 13.2% 19.6% Chula Vista Government 2)803 21320 77.9% 78.1% 12.3% 7.1% 9.8% 14.9% Backed Purchase Conventional 0/1 Purchase 1)983 21590 72.7% 70.2% 1300 10.2% 13.7% 19.6% Refinance 13)305 8�693 68.3% 55.3% 16.2% 18.9% 15.4% 25.8% Home 381 11121 49.9% 56.7% 39.9% 26.8% 10.2% 16.5% Improvement Total 18,472 14,724 1 69.9% 1� 61.6% 1 15.9% 16.1% 14,.3% 22.3% Coronado Government 30 41 66.7% 73.2% 20.0% 2.4% 13.3% 24.4% Backed Purchase Conventional 217 240 76.0% 68.8% 13.4% 10.4% 10.6% 20.8% Purchase Refinance 1)21'7 422 71.2% 6 1.1(Yo 15.5% 20.6% 13.3% 18.2% Home 43 43 76.7% 53.5% 9.3% 30.2% 14.0% 16.3% Improvement Total 1)507 746 71.9% 63.8% 15.1% 16.9% 12.9% 19.3% B-. 11 1MDA]DATA, B-1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 565 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,P t, V 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-1: Disposition of Home Loans Total Applicants Percent Approved Percent Denied Percent Other' jurisdiction 20�12 20�17 2012 20�17 2012 2017 20�12 20�17 Del Mar Government 6 5 83.3% 80.0% 0.0(y(,) 20.0% 16.7(Y(,) 0.0% Backed Purchase I I Conventi.onal 192 197 72.4% '7 0.1(Yo 11.5% 10.2(Y(,) 16.1% 19.8%) Purchase I Refinance 1)097 327 71.8% 57.5% 14.8% 18.0% 13.4% 24.5% Home 23 46 56.5% 60.9% 13.0(Y(,) 21.7(Y(,) 30.4% 17.4% Improvement Total 11318 575 71.7% 62.3% 14.2% 15.7% 14.1% 22.1% El.Cajon Government 664 724 75.3% 76.1% 9.5% 8.8% 15.2% 15.1(Vo Backed Purchase Conventional 744 11448 72.3% 70.4% 14.4% 13.3% 13.3% 16.3% Purchase Refinance 5,224 3,119 70.7% 59.4% 15.3% 17.4% 14.1(Yo 23.1(Yo Home 207 389 63.3% 59.6% 30.4% 23.9% 6.3% 16.5% Improvement Total 61839 5,680 71.1% 64.4% 15.1% 15.7% 13.8% 19.9% Encinitas Government 184 77 73.4% 70.1(Vo 12.5% 3.9% 14.1% 26.0% Backed Purchase Conventional 1)380 11529 75.7% 70.7% 9.6% 10.0% 14.7% 19.3% Purchase Refinance 7)671 2�633 72.5% 61.5% 12.8% 17.3% 14.7% 21.3% Home 165 317 71.5% 61.5% 15.8% 17.4% 12.7% 2 1.1(Vo Improvement Total 91400 4�556 1 73.0% 64.7% 12.4% 14.6% 14,.7 OVo 20.7% Escondido Government 1)062 11131 75.0% 75.2% 12.2% 9.7% 12.7% 15�.1% Backed Purchase Conventional 1)314 21335 76.4% 71.2% 12.0% 9.8% 11.6% 19.0% Purchase Refinance 8)049 4A15 69.5% 5 5.1(yo 16.0% 18.3% 14.4% 26.6(yo Home 205 545 46.8% 55.0% 38.0% 27.0% 15.1(Vo 18.0% Improvement Total 10,630 8,426 70.5% 62.2% 15.6% 15.3% 13.9% 22.4% Ai�,pi,",�,11,11,MIx B: B-2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 566 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,P t, V 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-1: Disposition of Home Loans Total Applicants Percent Approved Percent Denied Percent Other' jurisdiction 20�12 20�17 2012 20�17 2012 2017 20�12 20�17 Imperial Beach Government 118 277 70.3% 72.6% 15.3(Y(,) 7.2(Y(,) 14.4% 20.2% Backed Purchase I I Conventi.onal 191 365 68.6% 64.4% 15.2% 13.2(Y(,) 16.2% 22.5% Purchase I Refinance 1)102 611 62.9% 55.2% 21.4% 20.3% 15.7% 24.5% Home 46 82 65.2% 57.3% 28.3(Y(,) 26.8(Y(,) 6.5(Y(,) 15.9% Improvement Total 11457 1�335 64.3% 61.4% 20.3% 16.0% 15.4% 22.5% La Mesa Government 411 371 74.5% 77.9% 14.4% 7.8% 11.2% 14.3% Backed Purchase ('.(,)nventi(,)nal 672 910 77.7% 77.9% 8.2% 6.7% 14.1(Yo 15.4% Purchase Refinance 4,003 1�902 7 3.2(Yo 62.3% 14.3% 15.5% 12.5% 22.3% Home ill 263 73.9% 63.9% 18.0% 18.3% 8.1(YO 17.9% Improvement Total 5)197 3�446 73.9% 68.2% 13.60vo 12.5% 12.5% 19.3% Lemon Grove Government 437 409 73.9% 74.6% 14.4% 8.3% 11.7% 17.1(Yo Backed Purchase Conventional 322 507 71.1% 73.6% 14.9% 5.9% 14.0% 20.5% Purchase Refinance 2)161 1�742 68.7% 56.9% 17.3% 16.5(yo 14.0% 26.5% Home 81 214 43.2% 59.3% 43.2% 25.2% 13.6% 15.4% Improvement Total 31001 2�872 69.0% 62.6% 17.3% 14.1% 13.7% 23.3% National City Government 352 314 69.0% 7 4.8 OYio 16.8% 11.5% 14.2% 13.7% Backed Purchase Conventional 209 360 72.7% 67.5% 12.9% 11.9% 14.4% 20.6% Purchase Refinance 1)641 1 A06 64.1(Yo 52.4(yo 2 0.2(Yo 2 0.2(Yo 15.7% 27.4(yo Home 69 194 52.2% 50.5% 36.2% 27.8% 11.6% 21.6% Improvement Total 2)271 2)274 65.3% 57.7% 19.5% 18.3% 15.2% 23.9% Ai�,pi,",�,11,11,MIx B: B-3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 567 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,P t, V 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-1: Disposition of Home Loans Total Applicants Percent Approved Percent Denied Percent Other' jurisdiction 20�12 20�17 2012 20�17 2012 2017 20�12 20�17 Oceanside Government 1)260 1)232 76.8% 78.2% 12.9(Y(,) 6.6(Y(,) 10.3% 15.3% Backed Purchase I I Conventional 1)809 2)722 76.9% 71.5% 10.5(Y(,) 10.2(Y(,) 12.5% 18.3% Purchase I Refinance 101164 51346 68.8% 57.9% 15.8% 17.7% 15.5% 24.4% Home 253 665 5 6.5(Yo 62.0% 32.8(Y(,) 20.0(y(,) 10.7% 18.0% Improvement Total 13,486--.__ 9)965 70.4% 64.4% 15.1% 14.4% 14.5% 21.2% Poway Government 295 194 75.9% 75.3% 7.5% 9.8% 16.6% 14.9% Backed Purchase Conventional 898 11229 78.1% 73.2% 9.9% 9.1% 12.0% 17.7% Purchase Refinance 6,419 2X1 75.9% 63.6% 11.7% 14.6% 12.4% 21.8% Home 153 253 77.1% 63.6% 13.7% 21.3% 9.2% 15.0% Improvement Total 71765 L 3)697 76.2% 67.4% 11.4% 13.0% 12.4% 19.6% San Diego Government 6)165 51098 72.9% 76.5% 13.6% 7.0% 13.5% 16.5% Backed Purchase Conventional 141246 18)7916 75.8% 73.0% 10.6% 8.9% 13.5% 18.1(YO Purchase Refinance 79)2'76 33)887 71.6% 57.6% 14.6% 18.1(yo 13.8% 24.3% Home 2)010 41388 62.5% 59.8% 28.0% 22.7% 9.5% 17.5% Improvement Total 101,697 62)169 72.1% 63.9% 14.3% 14.8% 13.6% 21.3% San Marcos Government 752 604 74.5% 73.2% 12.0% 10.9% 13.6% 15.9% Backed Purchase Conventional 1)721 21486 78.2% 72.8% 11.9% 9.4% 9.9(yo 17.7% Purchase Refinance 7)351 3A31 71.4% 59.3(yo 14.0% 16.8% 14.7% 23.9(yo Home 138 423 62.3% 62.4% 26.1% 21.0% 11.6% 16.5(YO Improvement Total 91962 6,944 72.6% 65.5% 13.6% 13.9% 13.7% 20.6% Ai�,pi,",�,11,11,MIx B: B-4, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 568 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,P t, r 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 M,E� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-1: Disposition of Home Loans Total Applicants Percent Approved Percent Denied Percent Other' jurisdiction 20�12 20�17 2012 20�17 2012 2017 20�12 20�17 Santee Government 536 561 78.4% 80.6% 11.2% 6.2(Y(,) 10.4% 13.2% Backed Purchase I I Conventional 436 951 7 8.2(Yo 73.9% 9.9(y(,) 9.3(Y(,) 11.9% 16.8% Purchase I Refinance 4)034 21323 70.4% 61.5% 15.0% 16.1% 14.6% 22.4% Home 121 306 60.3% 61.8% 30.6(Y(,) 26.8(Y(,) 9.1% 11.4% Improvement Total 5J27--.__ 4)141 71.7% 67.0% 14.6% 14.0% 13.8% 19.1% Solana Beach Government 13 7 76.9% 28.6% 15.4% 14.3% 7.7% 57.1% Backed Purchase ('.(,)nventi(,)nal 297 255 71.7% 68.2% 9.8% 10.6% 18.5% 21.2% Purchase Refinance 1)342 402 70.7% 59.0% 14.8(Yo 17.2% 14.5% 23.9% Home 25 51 80.0% 62.7% 16.0% 17.6% 4.0% 19.6% Improvement Total 1,677 715 71.1% 62.2% 14.0% 14.8% 15.0% 22.9% Vista Government 803 665 77.6% 77.9% 11.1% 7.4% 11.3% 14.7% Backed Purchase Conventional 1)216 11967 75.4% 71.1% 13.1% 10.1% 11.5% 18.9% Purchase Refinance 6)116 3X5 68.9% 56.5% 15.5(Yo 17.9% 15.7% 25.6% Home 172 446 59.3% 57.4% 32.0% 24.7% 8.7% 17.9% Improvement Total 8)307 6)403 1 70.5% 63.3% 15.0% 14.9% 14,.5 OVo 21.9% Unincorporated County Government 0/, Backed Purchase 1)477 11816 72.0% 76.8% 14.8/0 8.8% 13.2% 14.5% Conventional 1)830 31127 70.8% 67.0% 15.4% 13.5% 13.8% 19.6% Purchase Refinance 12)191 7M25 67.7% 57.9% 16.9% 17.1(Yo 15.4% 25.0% Home 437 965 51.9% 60.7% 36.8% 23.3% 11.2% 16.0% Improvement Total 15)935 13,733 68.0% 62.7% 17.1% 15.6% 14,.9% 21.7% Ai�,pi,",�,11,11,MIx B: B-5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 569 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS at-,IM,P t, V 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()17/kIR T101J111;1'a'NG C111 M,E� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-1: Disposition of Home Loans Total Applicants Percent Approved Percent Denied Percent Other' jurisdiction 20�12 20�17 2012 20�17 2012 2017 20�12 20�17 San Diego County Government 15)141 13)515 74.6% '7 7.1(Yo 12.8% 7.6% 12.6% 15.2% Backed Purchase Conventional 26)952 37)949 75.6% 72.0% 11.3% 9.7% 13.1% 18.4% Purchase Refinance 1551940 74)811 70.8% 58.0% 15.0% 17.7% 14.2% 24.3% Home 4)205 9)621 60.3% 59.7% 29.6(Y(,) 23.1(Y(,) 10.1(Y() 17.1(Yo Improvement Total 202)238 135)896 71.5% 63.9% 14.6% 14.8% 13.9% 21.2% Source:www.lcndingPattcrns.com�2020 Note: 1. "Other":Withdrawn/Incomplete AF'P I j.'x B-. B-6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 570 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,P t, r 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Income Level L oa n Applica n t R epte s en ta tion Table B-2: Demographics of Loan Applicants vs. Total Population Percent of Applicant Percent of Total V 1 ion jurisdiction Total Applicants Pool Population ariati Carlsbad White 62.8% 74.9�% -12.1% 62.8% Black 0.5% 1.2% -0.6% 0.5% Hispanic 4.6% 13.3% -8.7% 4.6% Asian 10.7% 7.0% 3.8% 10.7% Other 21.3% 3.7% 17.6% 21.3% Chula Vista White 23.3% 20.4% 2.9% 23.3% Black 4.3% 4.1% 0.2% 4.3% Hispanic 35.1% 58.2% -23.1% 35.1% Asian 11.3% 13.8% -2.4% 11.3% Other 25.9% 3.5% 22.4% 25.90/o Coronado White 65.8% 79.4% -13.6% 65.8% Black 0.6% 2.0% -1.3% 0.6% Hispanic 5.5% 12.2% -6.6% 5.5% Asian 1.5% 2.9�% -1.4% 1.5% Other 26.6% 3.6% 23.0% 26.6% Del Mar White 66.2% 89.4% -23.3% 66.2% Black 0.2% 0.2% -0.1% 0.2% Hispanic 3.0% 4.2% -1.2% 3.0% Asian 5.7% 2.8% 3.0% 5.7% Other 24.9% 3.4% 21.5% 24.9�% El Cajon White 58.3% 56.8% 1.5% 58.3% Black 2.5% 6.0% -3.5% 2.5% Hispanic 11.9% 28.2% -16.3% 11.9�% Asian 3.1% 3.4% -0.3% 3.1% Other 24.3% 5.7% 18.6% 24.3% B-7 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 571 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,P t, V 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-2: Demographics of Loan Applicants vs. Total Population Percent of Applicant Percent of Total V 1 ion jurisdiction Total Applicants Pool Population ariati Encinitas White 70.8% 78.8% -8.0% 70.8% Black 0.3% 0.5% -0.2% 0.3% Hispanic 3.4% 13.7% -10.2% 3.4% Asian 3.9% 3.8% 0.1% 3.9�% Other 21.6% 3.2% 18.4% 21.6% Escondido White 49�.9% 40.4% 9�.5% 49.9�% Black 1.8% 2.1% -0.3% 1.8% Hispanic 16.0% 48.9�% -32.9% 16.0% Asian 7.1% 5.9�% 1.2% 7.1% Other 25.2% 2.7% 22.4% 25.2% Imperial Beach White 45.9% 36.0% 9.8% 45.9�% Black 3.0% 4.0% -1.1% 3.0% Hispanic 18.6% 49.0% -30.4% 18.6% Asian 4.8% 6.2% -1.4% 4.8% Other 27.8% 4.8% 1 23.0%� 1 27.8% La Mesa White 57.7% 61.9�% -4.2% 57.7% Black 2.4% 7.2% -4.7% 2.4% Hispanic 10.3% 20.5% -10.2% 10.3% Asian 3.6% 5.5% -1.9% 3.6% Other 26.0% 4.9�% 21.0% 26.0% Lemon Grove White 35.6% 34.7% 0.9% 35.6% Black 8.5% 12.9�% -4.5% 8.5% Hispanic 23.0% 41.2% -18.2% 23.0% Asian 7.3% 6.1% 1.2% 7.3% Other 25.7% 5.0% 20.6% 25.7% National City White 19�.9% 11.7% 8.1% 19.9�% Black 3.6% 4.5% -0.9% 3.6% Hispanic 40.9% 63.0% -22.1% 40.90/o Asian 10.1% 17.8% -7.7% 10.1% Other 25.5% 3.0% 22.6% 25.5 B:D1,7A.I.I....1�,1D MDA]DATA, B-8 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 572 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,P t, V 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-2: Demographics of Loan Applicants vs. Total Population Percent of Applicant Percent of Total V 1 ion jurisdiction Total Applicants Pool Population ariati Oceanside White 52.9% 48.4% 4.5% 52.9�% Black 3.2% 4.2% -1.1% 3.2% Hispanic 14.5% 35.9�% -21.4% 14.5% Asian 5.4% 6.4% -1.0% 5.4% Other 24.0% 5.1% 18.9% 24.0% Poway White 53.6% 69.1% -15.5% 53.6% Black 1.3% 1.5% -0.2% 1.3% Hispanic 6.5% 15.7% -9�.2% 6.5% Asian 15.4% 9.9�% 5.4% 15.4% Other 23.3% 3.7% 19�.5% 23.3% San Diego White 44.3% 45.1% -0.8% 44.3% Black 3.4% 6.3% -2.9% 3.4% Hispanic 13.9% 28.8% -14.9% 13.9�% Asian 13.1% 15.6% -2.5% 13.1% Other 25.3% 4.2% 1 21.1%� 1 25.3% San Marcos White 27.7% 48.6% -21.0% 27.7% Black 0.6% 2.1% -1.5% 0.6% Hispanic 5.2% 36.6% -31.5% 5.2% Asian 4.5% 8.8% -4.3% 4.5% Other 62.2% 3.9�% 58.3% 62.2% Santee White 61.0% 73.6% -12.6% 61.0% Black 1.4% 1.8% -0.4% 1.4% Hispanic 9.9% 16.3% -6.3% 9.9�% Asian 3.8% 3.7% 0.2% 3.8% Other 23.8% 4.6% 19�.2% 23.8% Solana Beach White 69�.6% 77.3% -7.6% 69.6% Black 0.3% 0.4% -0.2% 0.3% Hispanic 3.8% 15.9�% -12.2% 3.8% Asian 3.8% 3.9�% -0.2% 3.8% Other 22.6% 2.4% 20.2% 22.6 B:D1,7A.I.I....1�,1D MDA]DATA, B-9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 573 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS(Y'l-,IM,P t, r 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T101J111;1'a'NG C111 M,E� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-2: Demographics of Loan Applicants vs. Total Population Percent of Applicant Percent of Total V 1 ion jurisdiction Total Applicants Pool Population ariati Vista White 52.5% 40.8% 11.7% 52.5% Black 1.7% 2.9�% -1.2% 1.7% Hispanic 16.0% 48.4% -32.3% 16.0% Asian 5.5% 4.1% 1.4% 5.5% Unincorporated County White 58.3% 61.4% -3.2% 58.3% Black 2.8% 3.9�% -1.1% 2.8% Hispanic 10.2% 25.5% -15.3% 10.2% Asian 2.5% 4.6% -2.1% 2.5% Other 26.2% 4.6% 21.6% 26.2%_ San Diego County White 48.2% 48.5% -0.3% 48.2% Black 2.8% 4.7% -1.9% 2.8% Hispanic 15.0% 32.0% -17.0% 15.0% Asian 9�.0% 10.6% -1.6% 9.0% Note: 1. Percent of total population estimates are based on 2017 applicant data and compared to total population estimates from the 2010 Census. 2. Percent of applicant pool does not take into account applicants indicated as"MultiRace"or whose race was"Unk/NA". Therefore,total Percentage of applicant pool does not add up to 100(Y(,). Source:www.lendi.ngpatterns.com,2020 B: B-10 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 574 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,P t, r 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Income Level Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnicity (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ Incomplete Carlsbad White Low(0 49% AMI) 40.5% 34.0% 25.5% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 52.6% 21.4% 26.0% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 60.1% 15.4% 24.5% Upper(_��120%AMI) 68.3% 10.2% 21.5% Unknown/NA 55.3% 13.8% 30.9% Black Low(0_49% AMI) 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% Middle (80-119% AMI) 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% Upper(>-120% AMI) 75.7% 8.1% 16.2% Unknown/NA 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 40.5% 3 4.0(Yo 25.5% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 52.6% 21.4% 26.0% Middle (80-119% AMI) 60.1% 15.4% 24.5%] Upper(>-120% AMI) 68.3% 10.2% 21.5% Unknown/NA 55.3% 13.8% 30.9% Asian Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 14.3% 57.1(Yo 28.6% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 45.5% 45.5% 9.1(Yo Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 56.9% 13.7% 29.4% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 64.6% 12.3% 2 3.2(Yo Unknown/NA 35.7% 7.1% 57.1% Chula Vista White Low(0-49% AMI) 46.4% 25.0% 28.6% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 56.0% 17.5% 26.5% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 73.3% 14.5% 12.1(Yo Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 65.3% 12.3% 22.4% 0/ Unknown/NA 5 5.1()/Yo 11.1(Yo 33.7% Black L Low ow(0 49% AMI) 42.9% 57.1% 0.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 48.6% 27.0% 24.3% 0 Middle (80-119% AMI) 58.4% 18.1% 23.5% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 61.5% 19.0(Yo 19.5% Ai�,pi,",�,11,11,MIx B: B-11 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 575 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incolmplete Unknown/NA 5 8.1(Yo 6.5(Yo 35.5% Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 31.0% 3 9.2(Yo 29.9% Moderate(50-79(Yo A MI) 46.1% 2 4.2(Yo 29.7(Y(,) Middle (80-119% Aml) 60.5% 14.1% 25.4% Upper(>-120% AMI) 61.4% 13.5% 25.1% Unknown/NA 48.3% 16.6% 35.1% Asian Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 31.6% 23.7% 44.7% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 45.3% 27.0% 27.7% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 56.3% 19.0% 24.6% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 61.9% 14.3% 23.8% Unknown/NA 96.4% 0.0% 3.6% Coronado White Low(0-49% AMI) -- -- -- Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 46.7% 26.7% 26.7(Y(,) Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 54.3% 28.6% 17.1(Y(,) Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 61.8% 15.0% 2 3.2(Yo 7.7% 23.1(Yo Unknown/NA 69.2(Y() Black Low(0 49% AMI) Moderate (50-79% AMI) Middle (80-119% AMI) Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 60.0% 20.0% 2 0.0(Yo Unknown/NA -- -- Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 0.0% 100.0% 0.0(Yo Moderate (50-79% AMI) Middle (80-119% AMI) Upper(>-120% AMI) 51.2% 22.0% 26.8% Unknown/NA 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian Low(0-49(Yo AMI) -- -- -- Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) Upper(>-120% AMI) 75.0% 12.5% 12.5% Unknown/NA 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% AF'P I j.'x B: B-12 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 576 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ,"Im ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 _1 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incolmplete Del Mar White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 36.4% 54.5% 9.1(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 21.4% 21.4% 57.1(Y(,) Mi.ddle (80-119% Aml) 65.0% 20.0% 15.0% Uppe (>-120% AMI) 66.0% 12.7% 21.3% Unknown/NA 53.8% 23.1% 23.1% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Unknown/NA 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hi.spanic Low(0-49% AMI) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 50.0% 25.0% 25.0(Y(,) Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 57.1% 21.4% 21.4% Unknown/NA Asian Low(0 49% AMI) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 50.0% 16.7% 33.3% Upper(>-120% AMI) 65.2% 4.3% 30.4% Unknown/NA 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% El Cajon White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 41.5% 32.4% 2 6.1(Yo Moderate (50-79% AMI) 55.3% 21.7% 23.0% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 65.1% 12.9% 22.0% Upper(>-120% AMI) 67.9% 10.91% 21.1% Unknown/NA 55.2% 13.8% 30.9% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 66.7% 0.0(Yo 33.3% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 57.9% 26.3% 15.8% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 67.3% 18.2% 14.5%] Upper(>-120% AMI) 66.1% 12.5% 21.4% Unknown/NA 80.0% 5.0% 15.0% AF'P I j.'x B: B-13 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 577 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 26.7% 46.7% 26.7% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 42.8% 27.5% 29.7% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 62.5% 14.2% 23.3(Y(,) Upper(>-120% AMI) 24.1% 25.91% 50.0% Unknown/NA 48.6% 16.2% 35.1% Asian Low(0-49% AMI) 10.0% 70.0% 20.0% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 40.0% 28.0% 3 2.0(Yo Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 61.7% 19.1(Yo 19.1(Yo Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 55.3% 13.6% 3 1.1(Yo 0/ Unknown/NA 5 7.1()/Yo 0.0% 42.9% Encinitas White Low(0-49% AMI) 28.4% 50.0% 21.6% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 39.6% 3 0.2(Yo 3 0.2(Yo Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 52.7% 21.3% 26.0(Y(,) Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 66.6% 11.2% 2 2.2(Yo Unknown/NA 54.1% 21.6% 24.3% Black Low(0-49% AMI) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 61.5% 15.4% 23.1(Y(,) Unknown/NA 0.0% 100.0% 0.0(Yo Hispanic Low(0-49% AMI) 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%j Moderate (50-79% AMI) 42.9% 28.6% 28.6% Middle (80-119% AMI) 46.2% 26.9% 26.9% Upper(>-120% AMI) 71.4% 10.1% 18.5% Unknown/NA 20.0% 0.0% 8 0.0(Yo Asian Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 100.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Middle (80-119% AMI) 44.4% 11.1% 44.4% Upper(>120% AMI) 60.7% 19.0% 20.2% tinknown/NA 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% AF'P I j.'x B: B-14, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 578 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Escondido White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 38.2% 3 0.0(Yo 31.8% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 54.2% 18.5% 27.4% Mi.ddle (80-119% Aml) 64.4% 11.9% 23.7% Upper(>-120% AMI) 65.5% 11.2% 23.4% Unknown/NA 55.4% 12.8% 31.8% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 16.7% 66.7% 16.7% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 60.0% 2 0.0(Yo 2 0.0(Yo Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 65.9% 12.2% 22.0% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 68.2% 14.1(Yo 17.6% Unknown/NA 61.5% 15.4% 23.1% Hispanic Low(0-49% AMI) 24.1% 41.4% 34.5% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 47.4% 27.4% 25.3% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 57.3% 15.9% 26.8(Y(,) Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 61.0% 14.4% 24.6% Unknown/NA 51.6% 21.0% 27.4% Asian Low(0_49% AMI) 34.6% 34.6% 30.8% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 50.8% 23.0% 26.2% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 54.1% 18.2% 27.7% Upper(>-120% AMI) 58.9% 16.2% 24.9% Unknown/NA 45.5% 22.7% 31.8% Imperial Beach White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 41.9% 25.8% 32.3% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 64.8% 16.7% 18.5% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 57.1% 18.8% 24.1% Upper(>-120% AMI) 63.4% 12.5% 24.2% Unknown/NA 62.9% 14.3% 22.9% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo A MI) 66.7% 0.0(Yo 33.3% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 56.3% 0.0(Yo 43.8% Upper(>-120% AMI) 47.8% 8.7% 43.5% Unknown/NA 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% AF'P I j.'x B: B-15 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 579 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 35.3% 29.4% 35.3% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 43.3% 29.9% 26.9% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 53.2% 22.1(Yo 24.7% Upper(>-120% AMI) 56.8% 13.5% 29.7% Unknown/NA 62.5% 0.0% 37.5% Asian Low(0-49% AMI) 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 54.5% 36.4% 9.1(Yo Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 57.8% 11.1(Yo 3 1.1(Yo 0/ Unknown/NA 0.0()/Y() 2 5.0(Yo 75.0% La Mesa White Low(0_49% AMI) 46.2% 24.0% 29.8% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 61.2% 15.5% 23.3% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 69.1% 10.7% 20.2% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 67.7% 10.5% 21.8% Unknown/NA 58.7% 13.0%) 28.3% Black Low(0_49% AMI) 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 57.1% 14.3% 28.6% Middle (80-119% AMI) 68.0% 12.0% 20.0% Upper(>-120% AMI) 67.3% 12.2% 20.4% Unknown/NA 37.5% 12.5% 50.0% Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 23.1(Yo 4 6.2(Yo 30.8% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 50.0% 2 0.0(Yo 3 0.0(Yo Middle (80-119% Ami) 66.3% 12.5% 21.2% Upper(>-120% AMI) 66.2% 9.0% 24.8% Unknown/NA 50.0% 11.5% 38.5% Asian Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 80.0% 2 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 85.7% '7.1(Yo '7.1(Yo Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 75.0% '7.1(Yo 17.9% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 51.2% 20.7% 28.0% Unknown/NA 33.3% 0.0% 6 6.7%]o AF'P I j.'x B: B-16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 58,0 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, V 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Lemon Grove White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 41.6% 24.7% 33.8% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 52.5% 13.0% 34.5(Y(,) Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 63.9% 10.3% 25.8% Uppe (>-120% AMI) 62.2% 11.2% 26.6% Unknown/NA 55.2% 16.4% 28.4% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 29.4% 47.1(Yo 23.5% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 52.6% 10.5% 36.8% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 63.9% 13.3% 22.9% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 53.3% 18.7% 28.0% Unknown/NA 47.8% 13.0% 39.1% Hi.spanic Low(0-49% AMI) 40.0% 28.9% 31.1% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 42.8% 21.1% 36.2% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 59.7% 13.9% 26.4% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 591.0% 12.7% 28.3% Unknown/NA 50.0% 15.8% 3 4.2(Yo Asian Low(0_49% AMI) 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 67.4% 18.6% 14.0% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 70.8% 12.3% 16.9% Upper(>-120% AMI) 66.3% 14.0% 19.8% Unknown/NA 36.4% 0.0% 63.6% National City White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 50.0% 21.9% 2 8.1(Yo Moderate (50-79% AMI) 44.3% 22.8% 32.9% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 58.8% 12.5% 28.7% Upper(>-120% AMI) 591.4% 19.3% 21.3% Unknown/NA 56.3% 9.4% 34.4% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 25.0% 75.0% 0.0(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 60.0% 15.0% 25.0% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 33.3% 2 0.0(Yo 46.7(Yol Upper(>-120% AMI) 36.0% 32.0% 32.0% Unknown/NA 54.5% 9.1% 36.4% AF'P I j.'x B: B-17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 58,1 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 31.3% 43.4% 25.3% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 56.6% 17.5% 25.9% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 58.5% 14.8% 26.6(Y(,) Upper(>-120% AMI) 62.0% 15.4% 22.6% Unknown/NA 40.4% 17.5% 42.1% Asian Low(0-49% AMI) 12.5% 25.0% 62.5% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 58.5% 17.1(Yo 24.4% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 55.6% 13.9% 30.6(Y(,) 0/ Unknown/NA 2 3.5()/Yo 17.6% 5 8.8(Yo Oceanside White Low(0_49% AMI) 40.2% 30.6% 29.2% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 56.2% 18.0% 25.8% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 95.1% 2.3% 2.5% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 68.4% 10.5% 2 1.1(Yo Unknown/NA 591.0% 8.4%) 32.6% Black Low(0_49% AMI) 41.7% 41.7% 16.7% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 40.4% 34.0% 25.5% Middle (80-119% AMI) 58.1% 20.0% 21.9% Upper(>-120% AMI) 54.8% 21.7% 23.6% Unknown/NA 67.7% 3.2% 29.0% Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 33.6% 37.3% 29.1(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 44.3% 26.5% 2 9.2(Yo Middle (80-119% Ami) 61.9% 13.7% 24.4% Upper(>-120% AMI) 66.3% 10.5% 23.2% Unknown/NA 591.8% 9.8% 30.5% Asian Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 18.5% 37.0% 44.4% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 46.0% 2 2.2(Yo 31.7% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 61.5% 17.3% 21.2% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 62.4% 12.5% 2 5.1(Yo Unknown/NA 66.7% 4.8% 2 8.6(Yo AF'P I j.'x B: B-18 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 58,2 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Poway White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 39.1% 37.0% 23.9% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 52.8% 2 2.0(Yo 25.2% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 66.7% 14.3% 19.0% Uppe (>-120% AMI) 68.8% 10.7% 20.5% Unknown/NA 57.7% 15.4% 26.9% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 0.0% 100.0% 0.0(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 33.3% 0.0(Yo 66.7% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 71.4% 0.0(Yo 28.6(Y(,) Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 48.5% 30.3% 21.2% Unknown/NA 60.0% 0.0% 40.0% Hi.spanic Low(0-49% AMI) 36.4% 27.3% 36.4% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 44.0% 24.0% 32.0% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 54.5% 20.5% 25.0(Y(,) Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 56.0% 14.3% 29.7% Unknown/NA o 70.0(Y 0.0% 30.0% Asian Low(0_49% AMI) 44.4% 33.3% 22.2% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 50.0% 26.9% 23.1% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 59.6% 18.0% 22.5% Upper(>-120% AMI) 96.5% 1.0% 2.5% Unknown/NA 23.1(Yo 30.8% 4 6.2(Yo LY San Die,,o White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 44.7% 29.0% 26.4% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 54.4% 18.8% 26.8% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 64.0% 13.1% 22.9% Uppe (>-120% AMI) 66.4% 11.4% 22.2% Unknown/NA 54.3% 14.3% 31.3% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 3 1.1(Yo 48.0% 20.9% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 44.4% 27.8% 27.8% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 5 5.1(Yo 18.6% 26.3% Upper(>-120% AMI) 57.1% 18.91% 24.0% Unknown/NA 54.8% 13.6% 31.7% AF'P I j.'x B: B-19 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 58,3 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 31.6% 35.9% 32.5% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 49.9% 2 3.1(Yo 27.0% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 58.3% 15.9% 25.9(Y(,) Upper(>-120% AMI) 60.8% 14.2% 25.0% Unknown/NA 491.8% 14.0% 36.2% Asian Low(0-49% AMI) 34.1% 39.1% 26.9% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 53.4% 21.3% 25.3% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 58.9% 16.0% 2 5.1(Yo Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 65.1% 11.3% 23.6% 0/ Unknown/NA 4 9 1.2()/Yo 11.4% 39.5% San Marcos White Low(0_49% AMI) 44.0% 28.8% 27.2% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 51.5% 18.7% 29.8% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 65.5% 14.1(Yo 20.4% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 68.5% 10.5% 21.0% Unknown/NA 54.9% 15.0%) 30.1(Yo Black Low(0_49% AMI) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% Middle (80-119% AMI) 47.4% 10.5% 42.1% Upper(>-120% AMI) 70.0% 10.0% 20.0% Unknown/NA 75.0% 0.0% 25.0% Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 24.4% 41.5% 34.1(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 43.2% 3 1.1(Yo 25.8% Middle (80-119% Ami) 55.5% 16.1% 28.4% Upper(>-120% AMI) 58.0% 13.3% 28.7% Unknown/NA 52.0% 12.0% 36.0% Asian Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 28.6% 28.6% 42.9% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 44.7% 31.6% 23.7% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 5 7.1(Yo 14.3% 28.6% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 64.4% 13.7% 21.8% Unknown/NA 54.5% 18.2% 2 7.3%]o AF'P I j.'x B: B-20 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 58,4 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Santee White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 44.5% 31.3% 2 4.2(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 53.3% 22.7% 23.9(Y(,) Mi.ddle (80-119% Aml) 68.2% 10.7% 21.1% Uppe (>-120% AMI) 70.6% 9.7% 19.8% Unknown/NA 56.1% 14.0% 29.9% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 0.0% 100.0% 0.0(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 36.4% 36.4% 27.3% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 69.6% 21.7% 8.7% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 72.0% 12.0% 16.0% Unknown/NA 80.0% 0.0% 20.0% Hi.spanic Low(0-49% AMI) 41.7% 29.2% 29.2% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 42.9% 30.2% 27.0% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 58.1% 17.1(Yo 24.8% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 66.5% 12.1(Yo 21.4% Unknown/NA 61.5% 15.4% 23.1(Yo Asian Low(0_49% AMI) 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 52.6% 26.3% 21.1% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 70.0% 8.0% 22.0% Upper(>-120% AMI) 55.6% 12.1% 32.3% Unknown/NA Solana Beach White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 18.2% 54.5% 27.3% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 38.9% 33.3% 27.8% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 57.1% 23.8% 19.0% Upper(>-120% AMI) 64.8% 9.6% 25.6% Unknown/NA 50.0% 28.6% 21.4% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo A MI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Upper(>-120% AMI) 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Unknown/NA 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% AF'P I j.'x B: B-21 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 58,5 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 100.0% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 25.0% 75.0% 0.0(Yo Upper(>-120% AMI) 68.2% 13.6% 18.2% Unknown/NA 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian Low(0-49% AMI) 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 100.0% 0.0(Yo 0.0(Yo Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 0.0% 0.0(Yo 100.0% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 50.0% 12.5% 37.5% 0/ Unknown/NA 0.0()/Y() 0.0% 0.0% Vista White Low(0_49% AMI) 44.0% 27.5% 28.6% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 50.5% 23.3% 26.3% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 61.5% 12.2% 26.3(Y(,) Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 68.8% 10.5% 20.7% Unknown/NA 56.7% 10.4%) 32.8% Black Low(0_49% AMI) 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 33.3% 25.0% 41.7% Middle (80-119% AMI) 41.2% 23.5% 35.3% Upper(>-120% AMI) 61.7% 18.3% 20.0% Unknown/NA 46.2% 7.7% 4 6.2(Yo Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 24.7% 42.5% 32.9% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 45.6% 28.0% 26.4% Middle (80-119% Ami) 61.1% 1-3.8()Y(o 25.1% Upper(>-120% AMI) 62.9% 9.8% 27.3% Unknown/NA 55.8% 2.3% 41.9% Asian Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 4.8% 61.9% 33.3% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 40.0% 35.0% 25.0% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 64.1(Yo 14.1(Yo 21.8% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 63.9% 10.6% 25.5% Unknown/NA 38.5% 15.4% 4 6.2%]o AF'P I j.'x B: B-22 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 58,6 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ,"Im ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 _1 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Unincorporated County White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 37.1% 33.0% 29.8% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 53.0% 21.3% 25.7% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 62.9% 14.5% 22.5% tJppe (>-120% AMI) 66.5% 11.8% 21.7% tJnknown/NA 57.8% 10.8% 31.4% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 27.3% 63.6% 9.1(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 45.1% 33.3% 21.6% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 59.5% 15.9% 24.6% Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 62.1(Yo 20.5% 17.4% tJnknown/NA 65.9% 4.5% 29.5% Hi.spanic Low(0-49% AMI) 25.9% 43.7% 30.4% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 43.3% 23.8% 32.9% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 54.0% 15.3% 30.7(Y(,) Upper(->120(Yo AMI) 62.0% 15.0% 23.0% Unknown/NA 45.8% 15.3% 3 8.9(Yo Asian Low(0_49% AMI) 21.7% 43.5% 34.8% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 56.6% 2 0.8()Y(o 22.6% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 54.9% 20.6% 24.5% tJpper(>-120% AMI) 60.6% 13.7% 25.7% Unknown/NA 45.0% 20.0% 35.0% San Diego County White Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 41.6% 30.4% 27.9% Moderate (50-79% AMI) 54.0% 19.9% 26.0% Mi.ddle (80-119% AMI) 64.0% 13.1% 22.9% tJpper(>-120% AMI) 66.9% 11.2% 21.9% tJnknown/NA 55.7% 13.1% 31.2% Black Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 31.7% 4 9.2(Yo 19.1(Yo Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 45.2% 27.6% 27.2% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 57.5% 17.9% 24.6%] tJpper(>-120% AMI) 591.5% 18.1% 22.5% tJnknown/NA 58.8% 9.3% 31.9% AF'P I j.'x B: B-23 2020-06-23 Agenda Packelt, Page 58,7 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A��IALYSIIS o"l-,IM,p t, v 1,11 1 11%1�[ 01C ()IF/U'R T-101JI'S'a"NG C111 NIE� ]IS '1 0 111", Table B-3: Lending Patterns by Race/Ethnl"cl*ty (2017) jurisdiction Approved Denied Withdrawn/ incomplete Hispanic Low(0-49(Yo AMI) 30.7% 3 8.1(Yo 31.2% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 47.4% 23.8% 28.8% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 58.8% 15.4% 25.8(Y(,) Upper(>-120% AMI) 61.7% 13.5% 24.8% Unknown/NA 50.0% 14.2% 35.8% Asian Low(0-49% AMI) 31.5% 38.5% 30.0% Moderate(50-79(Yo AMI) 51.7% 22.7% 25.6% Middle (80-119(Yo AMI) 58.8% 16.5% 24.7% Upper(—>120(Yo AMI) 63.7% 12.0% 24.3% Unknown/NA 48.8% 12.3% 38.9% S(-)urce:www.lendingpatterns.com,2020 AF'P I j.'x B: B-24, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 58,8 of 768 N4 " "1 110111111111111% unwifiq JL AIR, Hillpf 0 1,1J SI'N1`G S%.111, E1,'1, V'I(",,."ES ................ T S 0 1,��,J`TR A.(111114" EVI ET� AN ANALYSIS O�F IMPEDIMENTS To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE This appendix lists the outreach and educational events hosted by CSA from FY 2015, to FY 2018. Col. FY 201 5 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliililI JULY 20�15 1 —South Bay Senior Service Providers meeting—Fredericka Manor- Chula Vista 7—La Mesa Community Collaborative meeting 7—1,-'now Your Housing Rights (Arabic) presentation - Silver Cross—El Cajon 7 —El Cajon Collaborative meeting—CSA and PCI presenting—El Cajon 8—East County Senior Service Providers meeting—Salvation Army—El Cajon 9 —SDRAFFH meeting—La Mesa Police Station Community Room 9 —1,-'now Your Housing Rights (Arabic) presentation— 660 S. 3"'—El Cajon 14—Newcomers Collaborative meeting— HHSA/CWS 389 N Magnolia—El Cajon 14—SoCAN—Beyond the Sky Solutions —planning meeting—Chula Vista 14—Is,now Your Housing Rights (Arabic) presentation— 175 S Anza—El Cajon 15 —I<.-imball Tirey St.John Fair Housing Webinar 15,—East County Action Network meeting—Rennette Recreation Center—El Cajon 15,—I-C,now Your Housing Rights (Arabic) presentation- Foothills Adult School—El Cajon 16—Is,now Your Housing Rights presentation (Spanish/English) — Chula Vista Pub. Library 21 —Crime Free Multi-Housing Landlord Seminar—Santee City Hall 22—I-C,now Your Housing Rights (Arabic) presentation—343 E Main St. —El Cajon 23—I-C,now Your Housing Rights (Spanish/English) presentation—ACCE tenants group— Chula Vista 27—Fair Housing 101 —workshop— 1401 National City Blvd., National City Public Library 28—South County Action Network meeting—Bonita Sunnyside Library—Bonita AUGUST 20�15 3 —National City Collaborative Partners meeting—National City Public Library 3 —East County Coalition meeting— 131 Avocado Ave. —El Cajon 4—El Cajon Collaborative meeting—Bill Beck Park—El Cajon 4 - La Mesa Collaborative meeting—4975, Memorial Drive—La Mesa 6 —Fair Housing 10 1 —workshop—Lemon Grove Public Library 7- 2" Annual Back to School jam—Spring Valley Public Library 11 -Newcomer's Collaborative Meeting- HHSA/CWS 389.N Magnolia Ave. El Cajon 11 —Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting—Turning the Hearts Center—Chula Vista 12—East County Senior Providers meeting—Salvation Army—El Cajon 13—Is,now Your Housing Rights (Arabic/English) —International Rescue Committee—El Cajon 17—Fair Housing 101 workshop— Chula Vista Public Library 365 F St—Chula Vista All?[)FATIA.'X Sl�,,,,�u,:2015 C-1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 58,9 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 11 � � 1111111111 1 F H _)IJS�N mc,"I,�,, A,TNA..I,,,YSIS TO, A]R C I ci�i I SEPTEMBER 2015 1 - La Mesa Collaborative meeting—4975, Memorial Drive—La Mesa 1 —El Cajon Collaborative meeting—Cajon Valley Union School Dist. —El Cajon 8,— Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting—Turning the Hearts Center—Chula Vista 8 - Newcomers Collaborative meeting- 389 N Magnolia Ave—El Cajon 9 —East County Senior Service Providers meeting—Salvation Army—El Cajon 9 — "Effective Apartment/Condo Complex Management" presentation - Pacific Southwest Assc. Of Realtors — 880 Canarios Court— Chula Vista 12—Health, Wellness and Safety Fair—First Baptist Church -Thrive Lemon Grove 14—Fair Housing 101 presentation—South Chula Vista Public Library 389 Orange Ave C? 17 — Know Your Housing Rights workshop for parents at juvenile Court& Community Schools 8,00 National City Blvd. National City 17—I-C,now your Housing Rights presentation—National City Public Library 17—SDRAFFH Strategic Planning Subcommittee Meeting—Civic Ctr Plaza—San Diego 17—Is,now Your Housing Rights presentation (Arabic) —IRC 131 E Main—El Cajon 19_ loth Annual Spring Valley Fiesta— 836 Kempton St, Spring Valley 23—Santee Collaborative meeting—Santee City Hall 23—SoCAN Live Stronger Longer Fair—276 F St— Chula Vista 24—Get Smart About Your Park—Mobile Home presentation—Santee Public Library A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,,,,�,ci,:2015 C-2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 590 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL H _)IJS�N j �mc,"I,�,' ATNA..I.NSIS STOFA.111. C I (Nci�i 1 "'111 16' C 0 1120d, F Y 2w 1 0 JULY 20�16 12—Newcomers Collaborative meeting—HHSA/CWS 389 N Magnolia—El Cajon 14—SDRAFFH meeting— Chula Vista 19—I-C,now Your Housing Rights (Arabic) presentation—IRC 131 Main—El Cajon 27—I-C,now Your Housing Rights (Arabic) presentation—St Michael's 343 E Main St. —El Cajon AUGUST 4—1,-'now Your Housing Rights (Arabic/English) —St John's 1430 Melody Ln—El Cajon 10—Fair Housing presentation—Chula Vista Public Library 365, F St— Chula Vista SEPTEMBER 2016 13—Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting—Turning the Hearts Center—Chula Vista 21 —East County Action Network meeting—Rennette Recreation Center—El Cajon 21 —I-C,now Your Housing Rights presentation (Arabic) —St Michaels E Washington—El Cajon 22—Is,now Your Housing Rights (English/Arabic) presentation—IRC 131 Main—El Cajon 24—Civility Day—N CRC Event—J Street Marina—Chula Vista 28—Santee Community Collaborative Meeting—Santee City Hall 29 — Fair Housing Rights and Responsibilities presentation for County employees 7947 Mission Center Court,, San Diego 92108, 30—Seventh Annual Senior Expo—La Mesa Community Center OCTOBER 2016 7—El Cajon Collaborative Meeting 11 —Chula Vista Community Collaborative Meeting 11 —Newcomer Collaborative Meeting 13—San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDRAFFH) Meeting 14—Dia de Los Muertos—Sherman Heights —Community Fair resource table 26—Santee Community Collaborative Meeting NOVEMBER 2016 1 —La Mesa Collaborative Meeting 4—El Cajon Collaborative Meeting 8—Newcomer Collaborative Meeting 8— Chula Vista Community Collaborative Meeting 9 —Fair Housing Presentation for North San Diego County Association of Realtors—Vista 16—Fair Housing Presentation in English and Arabic—St Michael's Chaldean Catholic Church—El Cajon 16—East County Action Network Meeting- El Cajon 17—Town Hall.Meeting, Spring Valley Community Center—resource table 18—Community Fair—St Michael's Chaldean Catholic Church—El Cajon DECEMBER 2016 2—El Cajon Collaborative Meeting 21 —Fair Housing Presentation for property owners, site-managers and tenants.Lincoln Acres Community Center, National City CSA Fair Housing (CDBC-T) Events for July through September 2016 A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,,,,�u,:2015 C-3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 591 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 11 � � 1111111111 1 F H _)IJS�N mc,"I,�,' A,TNA..I,,,YSIS TO, A]R C I cl,��i I JANUARY 20�17 11 —SDRAFFH Meeting—El Cajon 18—FH Presentation—St Michael's Church—El Cajon 25 —Fair Housing Workshop, Council Chambers,National City 25,—Santee Community Collaborative Meeting 30—National City Library— flyer/brochure distribution FEBRUARY 2017 6 —National City Library—informal presentation 6 —Santee City Council Meeting 7—FH Presentation—Headstart Program— Chula Vista 8,—FH Presentation—Headstart Staff— Chula Vista 10—FH Presentation—Alpine Public Library 11 —Chula Vista Orange Branch Public Library—Informal Presentation C? 13—National City Public Library—Informal Presentation 13—Tenants Rights Workshop—1<.-imball Elementary School—National City 14—Love Your Heart community event—Spring Valley 14—Newcomers Collaborative Meeting—El Cajon 14—El Cajon City Council Meeting 14—Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting 14—FH Presentation—St John's Lutheran Church—El Cajon 15,—East County Action Network Meeting (ECAN) - El Cajon 20—National City Public Library—informal presentation 22—Working to Ensure Stable Housing—Camden Village Apts —Chula Vista (and National City) MARCH 2017 2—Emergency Preparedness Fair—Mountain Empire H.S., Pine Valley 3 —Tenants Rights presentation—Head Start—Chula Vista 4—First Steps to Ending Homelessness Community Fair—San Diego 6 —National City Public Library—Informal presentation 7-8,—Non Profit Academy, USD- San Diego 8,—Informal Fair Housing presentation—Skyline Hills Library,, San Diego 14—Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting 14—Newcomers' Collaborative meeting—El Cajon 15 —Spring into Healthy Living Community Fair—YMCA—Spring Valley 17—Bonita-Sunnyside Public Library—informal presentation 20—National City Public Library—informal presentation 24—ACCE Institute—informal presentation— Chula Vista 25—Women & Family Resource Fair—SDVLP—San Diego 27—National City Public Library--7informal presentation 28- Lincoln Acres Public Library—National City—informal presentation 30—EJE Academy—Fair Housing Presentation—El Cajon APRIL 2017 "FAIR HOUSING MONTH33 3 —National City Collaborative Meeting 3 —National City Public Library, informal workshop 4—Fair Housing Proclamation, National City 5 —El Cajon Public Library,,informal workshop A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,,,,�u,:2015 C-4 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 592 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL H _)IJS�N j �mc,"I,�,' A,TNA..I,,,YSIS STOFA.111. C I (Nci�i 1 "'111 5 —Santee Public Library,informal workshop 5 — Chula Vista Public Library,informal workshop 7—Bonita-Sunnyside Public Library,,informal workshop 8,—UCSD-AMSA 8,th Annual Health Fair, San Diego 10—National City Public Library, informal workshop 11 —Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting 11 —Newcomers' Collaborative meeting, El Cajon 12—Skyline Hills Public Library, San Diego,informal workshop 13—SDRAFFH Fair Housing Conference 15,—Santee Public Library,informal workshop 17—National City Public Library,informal workshop 19—El Cajon Public Library,informal workshop 19—FH Presentation—St Michael's Church—El Cajon 21 —Bonita-Sunnyside Public Library, informal workshop 22—Day of the Child Annual Fair, Chula Vista 24—National City Public Library, tenant landlord workshop 25,—Fair Housing Proclamation, El Cajon 26—UCSD Sustainability job Fair 27—National City Public Library,Workshop for Landlords &Property Managers 28—Summer Crest Apts,National City,Tenants Rights Workshop 29—Lincoln Acres Public Library, National City,informal workshop 30—Ciclavista Community Fair, Chula Vista MAY 2017 1 —National City Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 1 —National City Community Collaborative Meeting 2—La Mesa Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 3 —El Cajon Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 5 —Bonita-Sunnyside Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 6 —New Break Church, El Cajon—Community Fair event 8,—National City Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 8,— Carlsbad Senior Center Fair Housing Presentation 9 — Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partner's Meeting 10—Skyline Hills Library, San Diego—informal Fair Housing workshop 12—ECSSP 18,th Annual Senior Health Fair,La Mesa 13—Bonita-Sunnyside Library—Multi-Cultural Event 15,—National City Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 15, Santee Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 17—El Cajon Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 19—Bonita-Sunnyside Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 20—San Ysidro Parent Expo, Smythe Elementary School 22—National City Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 23—La Mesa Library—informal Fair Housing workshop JUNE 20�17 2—Bonita-Sunnyside Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 5 —National City Library—informal Fair Housing workshop A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,,,,�u,:2015 C-5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 593 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 11 � � 1111111111 1 F 'H _)IJS�N mc'"I'�" A,TNA..I,,,YSIS TO, A]R� C I ci�i 1 11 7 —El Cajon Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 10—Mabuhay Festival, Kimball Park,National City 12—National City Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 13—La Mesa Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 14—Skyline Hills Library, San Diego—informal Fair Housing workshop 15,—Chula Vista Library—Fair Housing workshop for Landlords 16—Santee Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 16—Bonita-Sunnyside Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 19—National City Library—Fair Housing workshop for Landlords 20- Health & Human Services, Chula Vista—Fair Housing Presentation 21 —El Cajon Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 26—National City Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 27—La Mesa Library—informal Fair Housing workshop 28—St. Michaels Church, El Cajon—Fair Housing Presentation 23-27—National Fair Housing Alliance Conference,Baltimore CSA Fair Housing Activities January through March 2017 A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,1111,�'ci,:2015 C-6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 594 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL H _)IJS�N j �mc,"I,�,' A,TNA..I,,,YSIS STOFA.111. C I (Nci�i 1 "'111 C.3 FY j 2,0�17 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilillillilliillillillillillillilliililI JULY 2017 03—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 10 - Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 13—SDRAFFH meeting— Oceanside 14—Presentation for Homestart staff—El Cajon 17 - Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 18 - Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Santee Library 27—Presentation and Q& A on Fair Housing&T/L— ACCE, Chula Vista AUGUST 20�17 2—FH &T/L (2) presentations, Reyo de Esperanza—Chula Vista 2—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 3 — Otay Elementary Sch. Open House—Resource Table—Chula Vista 7 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 8— Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting 8, - Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 14—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 15, -Tenant/Landlord& Fair Hsg Workshop - Reyo de Esperanza, Chula Vista 18—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Santee Library 25 —Fair Housing Presentation—ACCE staff— Chula Vista 29—Chula Vista Community Collaborative—Fair Housing Presentation SEPTEMBER 2017 11 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 12 - Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting 18—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 14—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 19—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Santee Library 21 —East County Action Network Meeting—El Cajon 23—Civility Day Resource Fair—Bayfront Park— Chula Visita 25,—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 26—South County Action Network—Live Stronger Longer Resource Fair 26 - Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 28—Fair Housing Workshop for Tenants —National City Library OCTOBER 2017 02—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 04—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 09—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 10—Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partner's meeting 12—SDRAFFH meeting—San Diego County—Ruffin Road 12—FH re: Assistant Animals presentation- Pacific SW Assoc. of Realtors in CV 16—"The Art of Inclusive Communication"workshop and seminar at CSA A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,,,,�u,:2015 C-7 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 595 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 11 � � 1111111111 1 F H _)IJS�N mc,"I,�,' A,TNA..I,,,YSIS TO, A]R� C I ci�i 1 11 Collaborating with National Conflict Resolution Center,Live Well San Diego&El Cajon Police Dept. 16—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 18—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 19—East County's Action Network meeting—El Cajon 20—Headstart ECS Resource Fair—Chula Vista 24—South County Action Network meeting—Bonita 24—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 27—SoCAN "Dancing for Your Health" resource fair—Chula Vista 30—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library NOVEMBER 2017 04—Newcomer's Multiculltural Fair—EJE Academies, El Cajon 06—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 07—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 09—Informal Fair Housing Workshop— Chula Vista F St. Library 11 —Technology Fair by San Diego Oasis at Grossmont Center—resource table 13 - Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 14—Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partner's meeting 15 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 16—East County's Action Network meeting—El Cajon 20—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 21 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 22—Fair Housing presentation-St Michael's Chaldean Catholic Church,, El Cajon 27—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 27—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Santee Library 28—South County Action Network meeting—Bonita 30 — East County Christmas Gift Basket Distribution w/Presentation and Q & A on Fair Housing, collaborating with Casa Familiar and Consulado Mexicano—CSA offices, El Cajon DECEMBER 2017 11 —FH &T/L presentation, Reyo de Esperanza—Chula Vista 12—Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partner's meeting 12—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 18 — South County Christmas Gift Basket Distribution w/Presentation and Q & A on Fair Housing, collaborating with Casa Familiar and Consulado Mexicano—National City Library 18—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Santee Library 20—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library JANUARY 2018 11 —SDRAFFH Meeting— Carlsbad 15,—Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partner's meeting 31 —Mobile Home Park Managers/Residents Presentation— Chula Vista City Hall FEBRUARY 2018 02—FH Presentation, Head Start—Chula Vista 07—FH Presentation for Social Service Providers, Rayo de Esperanza—Chula Vista 13—FH Presentation for Social Service Providers,, Chula Vista Comm. Collaborative 14—SDRAFFH Subcommittee Meeting A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,,,,�u,:2015 C-8 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 596 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL H _)IJS�N j �mc,"I,�,' ATNA..I.NSIS STOFA.111. C I (Nci�i 1 "'111 15,—East County's Action Network meeting—El Cajon 18—FH workshop— Church Bethel—National City 24—Karamu Festival—Spring Valley Branch Library MARCH 2018 03—Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partner's meeting 14—Spring into Healthy Living Fair—McGrath YMCA—Spring Valley 15 —Girls on the Run Community Fair—Lexington Elem. School—El Cajon 21 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 24—Women & Family Resource Fair—Jacobs Center—San Diego 24—SMOAC Annual Info & Health Fair—Meadowbrook—Santee 28—Santee Community Collaborative Meeting APRIL 20�18 2—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 3 —National City Proclamation 3 —El Cajon Collaborative Meeting 4—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 5 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 6 —SDRAFFH Conference/Training 10—Chula Vista Collaborative Meeting 16—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 18—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 19—East County's Action Network meeting—El Cajon 19—Fair Housing Presentation, Rayo de Esperanza FRC, Chula Vista 20—Fair Housing Presentation (Spanish),Rayo de Esperanza FRC, Chula Vista 24—Fair Housing Presentation— Carlsbad Senior Center 25 —Fair Housing Presentation (Spanish) —Carlsbad Senior Center 26—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 26—Fair Housing Presentation—Rayo de Esperanza FRC—Chula Vista 28—Day of the Child Fair—Memorial Park, Chula Vista MAY 2018 2—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 3 - Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 8,— Chula Vista Collaborative Meeting 11 —East County Senior Service Providers Health Fair—La Mesa 14—Informal Housing Workshop—National City Library 16—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 17—East County's Action Network meeting—El Cajon 18—FH Tester Training—CSA San Diego County large conference room 19—Newbreak Church Health and Wellness Fair—El Cajon 21 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 22—Educational FH Presentation for National Conflict Resolution Center's Quarterly Mediator Training, San Diego 23—Santee Collaborative meeting 24—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,,,,�u,:2015 C-9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 597 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL F H _)IJS�N mc,"I,�,' A,TNA..I,,,YSIS TO, A]R C I ci�i I JUNE 20�18 4—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 5 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange St. Library 6 — Casa Familiar Fair Housing Presentation—San Ysidro 12—Informal Fair Housing Workshop— Chula Vista Orange St. Library 12—Chula Vista Collaborative meeting 19—Informal Fair Housing Workshop— Chula Vista Orange St. Library 24—Fair Housing Presentation (Spanish) Bethel Church,National City 25,—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 26—Informal Fair Housing Workshop— Chula Vista Orange St. Library C 3 FY 2`1`01.8 l���l�iololololololololololololololololololololoiolololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololoiololololololololololololololololololololoiololololololoI JULY 2018 03 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange Library 05 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 09 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 10—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange Library 10—Fair Housing Presentation—CSA Offices, El Cajon 12—SDRAFFH meeting—La Mesa 17 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange Library 18 —Two Presentations on Tenant Landlord for juvenile Court & Comm. Schools UCCS) One in the morning and another in the afternoon—National City 18,—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 19 —East County Action Network meeting—El Cajon 19 —Fair Housing Presentation—Fair Winds—Chula Vista 23 —Fair Housing Outreach Workshop—National City Library 24—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange Library 26 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 31 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange Library C? AUGUST 2018 1 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 2—Informal Fair Housing Workshop— Chula Vista Orange Library 2—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 7—Fair Housing Booth—National Night Out— Coronado Terrace Apts. SD 92154 7—Fair Housing Informational Table—Nat'l Night Out—EDEN Housing, San Ysidro 9—Fair Housing/Tenant-Landlord presentation - St.John's Church—El Cajon 9—Open Door Event—480 Palomar St—Chula Vista 9—Informal Fair Housing Workshop— Chula Vista Library 13 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 14— Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting 14—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange Library 15 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 18—Fair Housing (Race,Immigration Status, National Origin) Presentation in Spanish— City Heights 21 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange Library C? Sl�,1111,�u,:2015 C-10 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 598 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 'H _)IJS�N j �mc'"I'�" A,TNA..I,,,YSIS STOFA.111. C I (Nci�i 1 "'111 21 —Fair Housing Presentation—Rayo de Esperanza— Chula Vista 22—Santee Collaborative meeting 23 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 23 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Library 24—Fair Winds T/L and FH workshop—Chula Vista 27 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 28,—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange Library 30—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Library SEPTEMBER 20�18 5—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 6—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 10—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 11 — Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting 12—East County Senior Service Providers meeting,El Cajon 19—Fair Housing and Tenant Landlord workshop for Episcopal Community Services and Head Start Staff, Chula Vista 19 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 20—East County Action Network meeting—El Cajon 24—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 26 —Santee Collaborative Meeting 27 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library OCTOBER 2018 03 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 04—Fair Housing&T/L rights workshop—ESC HeadStart—Chula Vista 04—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 08,—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 09 — Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting 10—Fair Housing&T/L rights workshop—Boys and Girls Club—National City 11 —SDRAFFH meeting—La Mesa 17—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 18—East County Action Network meeting—El Cajon 22—Fair Housing Outreach Workshop—National City Library 24—Santee Community Collaborative Meeting 25 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 25 — Public Educational Meeting regarding Fair Housing focusing on protected classes — CSA conference room—El Cajon NOVEMBER 2018 03 —Welcome Newcomers Network MultiCultural Fair—El Cajon 05 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 07 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 13 — Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting 14—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—Chula Vista Orange Ave Library 15 —San Ysidro Health/CMSS Fair—Crystal Ballroom—El Cajon 15 —East County Action Network meeting—El Cajon A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,,,,�'ci,:2015 C-11 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 599 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 11 � � 1111111111 1 F H _)IJS�N mc,"I,�,' A,TNA..I,,,YSIS TO, A]R� C I ci�i 1 11 19 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 21 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library DECEMBER 2018 03 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 11 — Chula Vista Community Collaborative meeting JANUARY 2019 24—SDRAFFH meeting—National City FEBRUARY 2019 05 —La Mesa Collaborative Meeting 06 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 07—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 11 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 12— Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partners Meeting 20—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 21 —East County Action Network Meeting—El Cajon 27—Santee Community Collaborative Meeting 28,—Live Well San Diego East Region Leadership Team Meeting—El Cajon 28—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library MARCH 2019 04—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 05 —La Mesa Collaborative Meeting 06 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 06 —Spring into Healthy Living Fair—McGrath Family YMCA, Spring Valley 07—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 20—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 25 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 27—Fair and Affordable Housing Presentation—Newcomers—El Cajon In English, Spanish and Arabic, at St John's Church 27 —Santee Community Collaborative Meeting 28—Live Well San Diego East Region Leadership Team Meeting—El Cajon APRIL 2019—FAIR HOUSING MONTH 02—La Mesa Collaborative Meeting 02—FH Proclamation, National City 03 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 04—SDRAFFH Conference, all counselors attending 06 — Grandparents Symposium, El Cajon 09 — Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partners Meeting 17—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 18,—East County Action Network Meeting, El Cajon 24—Santee Community Collaborative Meeting 25 —Live Well San Diego, East Region Leadership Meeting, El Cajon 25 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 27—Day of the Child, Chula Vista A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,,,,�u,:2015 C-12 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,00 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL 'H _)IJS�N j �mc'"I'�" A,TNA..I,,,YSIS STOFA.111. C I (Nci�i 1 "'111 MAY 2019 01 —Dia de Familia Event, Grossmont College, El Cajon 07—La Mesa Collaborative Meeting 08—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 09—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 13—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 14—Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partners Meeting 16—East County Action Network Meeting, El Cajon 22—Santee Community Collaborative Meeting 22—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 27—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—National City Library 30—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library JUNE 2019 05 —Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 06—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—La Mesa Library 11 —Chula Vista Community Collaborative Partners Meeting 19—Informal Fair Housing Workshop—El Cajon Library 20—East County Action Network Meeting, El Cajon 26—Santee Community Collaborative Meeting A]?[)EATIAN Sl�,1111,�'ci,:2015 C-13 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,01 of 768 'PROGRESS SI'NC�'1111E 2l l 01115 AN ANALYSIS OlF IMPEDIMENTS To FAIR HOUSING CHOICE his appendix summarizes and compares key findings contained in the 2015, Al document in order to evaluate the progress toward addressing impediments to fair housing choice. 0 Itupe(I'lin ients frona PrelvlO U-SAI Education and Outreach 0 Impediment. Educational and outreach hterature regarding fair housing issues, rights, and services on websites, or at pubhc counters is hmited. Recommendations: 1 The cities of Carlsbad,, Imperial Beach, and Solana Beach do not have links to fair housing resources on city websites, and Coronado does not have the most up to date information on its website. 2. Ensure ease of access to information about fair housing on websites,with links between jurisdictions and contracted service providers 3. Prominently display information on public counters and other points of public contact such as libraries and community centers 4. Increase knowledge of the process of reporting complaints and access/referral to government entities: California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH); U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); U.S. Department of justice (D0J) 5,. Continue to utilize the SDRAFFH to coordinate and promote outreach and education activities in the region. Efforts o. • Encinitas: The City continues to update it's website as new information becomes available. The City maintains various links and resources on the website, including the Fair Housing provider and regional San Diego Alliance for Fair Housing links. Also, the City provides Fair Housing information to the public through the City's social media presence and also the weekly City Manager update. Additionally, brochures for Fair Housing Services are provided in both English and Spanish at the City's public counters. Fair Housing Posters are also posted at City Hall in both English and Spanish. The City of Encinitas continues Participation in the San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDRAFFH). During Fair Housing Month, a number of activities were held throughout the County,including a Fair Housing Conference. • Escondido: The City continues to maintain and update it's website as new information becomes available. The City maintains links and resources on the website, including the Fair Housing provider. Brochures for Fair Housing Services are provided in both English and Spanish at the City's public counters. The City of Escondido continues participation in the P�[.,10GR,1,,'SS S[NCLd''4Z015 C-1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 6,02 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FAIR I IOUSI,�111111�G San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDRAFFH). The City annually hosts trainings/educational workshops for residents, non-profit organizations, and program staff. San Diego tity: In FY 2018 the City of San Diego maintained the City's Fair Housing webpage. The City also distributed 5,,150 multilingual brochures to various audiences and displayed brochures in public libraries and the Economic Development Department, distributed three new editions of the "Practice Fair Housing" city-wide newsletter, and provided two trainings to nonprofit agencies and CDBG program staff, provided thirty-one (31) educational workshops and trainings to Citizens of San Diego including one (1) specific training for Landlords. SDRAFFH in partnership with the San Diego Housing Federation hosted the 4th Annual Fair Housing Conference: Charting the Course: Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Fair Housing Act. The day long conference keynote speaker was Richard Rothstein, Economic Policy Institute. In FY 2017 the City distributed 5,376 multilingual brochures to various audiences and displayed brochures in the Economic Department,, distributed three new editions of the "Practice Fair Housing" citywide newsletter, provided two trainings to nonprofit agencies and CDBG program staff,and provided six(6) educational workshops and trainings to Citizens of San Diego including one (1) specific training for Landlords. SDRAFFH in partnership with the San Diego Housing Federation, and the University of San Diego hosted the 2nd Annual Fair Housing Conference: Knocking Down Walls: Fight to Reduce Homelessness and Open Doors to People with Criminal Histories. The daylong conference keynote speaker was Dr. Antwi Akom, Associate professor of Environmental Sociology at San Francisco State University. In FY 20�16 the City distributed 6,65,0 multilingual brochures to various audiences and displayed brochures in the Economic Development Department lobby,distributed two new editions of the "Practice Fair Housing" citywide newsletter, and provided five trainings to nonprofit agencies and CDBG program staff, including one to mental health providers. SDRAFFH held their annual meeting and hosted Professor Roy Brooks,University of San Diego School of Law,who spoke on the topic of racial justice in the United States. • San Marcos: The City contracts with the Legal Aid Society of San Diego (LASSD) for fair housing services, testing and outreach. LASSD has developed a comprehensive fair housing website that provides current fair housing laws and information,with a link to the City of San Marcos website. LASSD continues to provide fair housing brochures to libraries, community centers, within the City of San Marcos, as well as distributed brochures to community based organizations in San Marcos.LASSD,,through our fair housing training sessions,has increased the knowledge of the community in understanding fair housing rights. In addition, LASSD has successfully resolved actions with HUD and DFEH, which helped increased publicity about the referral process. LASSD's senior council Branden Butler serves as the Chairman of San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDRAFFH) and the City of San Marcos is a participating member. The SDRAFFH maintains a fair housing website that provides links to fair housing information listing participating jurisdictions and regional service providers. The SDRAFFH in partnership with the San Diego Housing Federation and the Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC). • Santee: The City provides links to fair housing and other housing resources on the City's Website (www.cityofsanteeca.gov). Additionally, there are fair housing service provider brochures in English and Spanish at the City's public counters located in the Development Services,, City Clerk and Community Services Departments. • Imperial Beach: The City provides an affordable housing link on its city webpage. A t-,P i JA [U)G Rl,d'S S S I'N C Ed''4(015) C-2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,03 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A�,,W',A(SJS Of�� Imp'll�,�,��l)IN,l�,�l,�"�',,N'TS 1-10 FAIR I IOUSI,�111111�G oqo1R_')1(01`11,�'� Oceanside: The City continues to update it's website as new information becomes available. The City maintains various links and resources on the website, including the Fair Housing provider and regional San Diego Alliance for Fair Housing links. Also, the City provides Fair Housing information to the public through the City's Housing Authority and three Community Resource Centers located in Neighborhood Revitalization Areas. Brochures for Fair Housing Services are Provided in both English and Spanish at all the identified locations. Fair Housing Posters are also posted at City Hall, Resource Centers and Park & Recreation facilities in both English and Spanish. The City continues participation in the San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDRAFFH). During Fair Housing Month, a number of activities are held throughout the County, including a Proclamation by the Oceanside City Council. Lending and Credit Counseling Impediment: Hispanics and Blacks continue to be under-represented in the homebuyer market and experienced larg�e disparities in loan approval rates. Recommendation: 1. All jurisdictions should collaborate with the San Diego Reinvestment Task Force to implement the recommendations contained in the Three Year Plan. 2. All jurisdictions that offer homebuyers programs also consider stepping up outreach efforts in minority communities in order to improve loan origination/approval rates and increase awareness of and education about homeownership opportunities. Efforts: • Countywide Efforts: In FY 2018, conducted three homebuyer education events focused on raising awareness and understanding of the home purchase loan process and homebuyer assistance programs available from local governments. Provided homebuyer assistance program information on flyers and postcards sent to 10,000+ Section 8 participants and residents of affordable housing developments. Provided financial and logistical support to expand the countywide Earned Income Tax Credit/Free Tax Preparation program and increase the number of individuals and families receiving free tax preparation services and the Earned Income Tax Credit. Held five public meetings with speakers, presentations and discussion on topics including the San Diego Community Land Trust,accessory dwelling units as a source of affordable housing and LMI owner income, fair housing issues and enforcement,and other topics. Convened workgroup and created collective action pro)ect on use, expansion, and home loan credit for accessory dwelling units in LM1 neighborhoods. Surveyed the largest banks in the county on their lending for LMI single-family mortgages, multifamily affordable housing, and small business loans, and presented the study results at a cr public RTF meeting • Chula Vista:The City offers gap financing for first-time low-income homebuyers to purchase eligible properties through its First-Time Homebuyer Program. • El Cajono. The City offers two unique programs designed to assist first-time homebuyers with purchasing a new or existing single-family or condominium home: the American Dream and California Dream First-Time Homebuyer programs. The City is currently reviewing At,Pi,'��,,,MJA ..........(015) C-3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,04 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FAIR I IOUSI,�111111�G opportunities to improve outreach efforts to minorities for these programs. HUD-approved Homebuyer Counseling is a required component of the City's homebuyer programs. El Cajon continues to work with the San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing (SDRAFFH) to explore the possibility of giving a presentation on the findings of the Al to the CRI. • Escondido: The City administers the Homebuyer Entry Loan Program (HELP). Brochures for this first-time homebuyer program are available on the City's website in both English and Spanish.The City continues to review opportunities to improve outreach efforts to minorities for this program. However, participation is low overall (not only among minorities) due to HUD requirements like maximum purchase price, and market influences, like buyers with all cash offers. HUD approved Homebuyer Counseling is a required component of the City's HELP. • National City:The City offers gap financing and down payment assistance for first-time low- income homebuyers to purchase eligible properties through its First-Time Homebuyer Program. • Oceanside: The City provides homebuyer assistance through its CalHome First-Time Homebuyer Program. The City established a computer lab at its Libby Lake Resource Center and coordinated with the Leichtag Foundation to provide assistance services via private web- conferencing. • San Diego City: The City has been actively supporting the activities of the San Diego Regional Alliance for Fair Housing regarding collaborations with the San Diego City/County Reinvestment Task Force. The City continued to support the activities of SDRAFFH with regard to collaboration with the San Diego City/County Reinvestment Task Force. In addition,the San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC) offers deferred loans,homeownership grants, and mortgage credit certificates to first-time homebuyers, through its First-Time Homebuyer Program. In FY 2017 the City provided five (5) educational workshops for home seekers,,homebuyers,and residents on Fair Housing rights. In FY 2016 the City provided two educational workshops for home seekers,homebuyers, and residents on Fair Housing rights. • San Diego County: The County offers low-interest deferred payment loans for low-income first-time homebuyers, through its Downpayment and Closing Cost Program.This program is available to first-time homebuyers looking to purchase homes in the unincorporated area of San Diego County or in the cities of Carlsbad, Coronado,Del Mar,Encinitas,Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, Poway, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach or Vista. • San Marcos: The City has increased referrals and access to HUD-Approved Housing Counseling Agencies. Additionally, the City ensured that this information was part of New First Time Homebuyer education curricula. Efforts to continue to hold HOME Clinics in collaboration with the Housing Opportunities Collaborative and the San Diego County Libraries are underway. • Vista:The City allocates CDBG funds annually to support programs that incorporate financial literacy. Housing Discrimination Impediment. Housing discrimination persists throughout the County, which is supported by general literature, statistical data, and testing conducted in the region. 1131, �1 0 1 , ? ..........(015) C-4 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,05 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A�,,W',A(SJS Of�� Imp'll�,�,��l)IN,l�,�l,�"�',,N'TS 1-10 FAIR I 10U'Sl'�111111�G oqo1R_')1(01`11'�'� Recommendations: 1. Conduct comprehensive and countywide random testing on a regular basis to identify issues, trends, and problem properties. Expand testing to cover other protected classes, especially those with emerging trends of suspected discriminatory practices. 2. Support stronger and more persistent enforcement activity by fair housing service providers. 3. Expand education and outreach efforts,with specific efforts outreaching to small rental properties where the owners/managers may not be members of the Apartments Association. Efforts: • San Diego Re ional Alliance for Fair Housing: SDRAFFH recently appointed a Steering 91 Committee to develop a Strategic Plan that is expected to include a coordinated approach to region-wide testing. • Carlsbad: The City tested for discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in 2017. Of the eight sites tested, one showed unequal treatment to the potential renter. • El Cajon: El Cajon expects to conduct random testing every 2 years, as funding allows, identifying issues and problem areas. In FY 2019 five sites were tested,three for disability and two for familial status. All units tested for disability showed a chance of discrimination,while the familial status did not. • Encinitas:The City randomly tested for discrimination on the basis of disability in 2016,2017 and 2018. There were five sites tested and none showed discrimination. • Escondido: The City performed test based on disability in 2016, 2017 and 2018,. There were 29 sites tested and five showed unequal treatment. There was also testing done in 2017 on the basis of sexual orientation at 11 sites. Three showed unequal treatment. • National City: The City randomly tested for discrimination on the basis of national origin in 2018,. Of the six sites tested, four showed unequal treatment to the potential renter • Oceanside: The City randomly tested for discrimination on the basis of race, disability, familial status and sexual orientation. In 2017 disability was tested at eight sites and three were reported to show unequal treatment. • San Diego City: In 2016, 2017 and 2018,the City of San Diego conducted 114 random audit tests. 13 of the tests done showed unequal treatment. Discrimination based on disability accounted for 11 of the random tests. • San Marcos: The City conducted random housing testing on the basis of discrimination for familial status, disability, sexual orientation and race. Of the total 28 sites tested, two sites were reported to show unequal treatment. ..........(015) C-5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,06 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FAIR I IOUSI,�111111�G Housing Options Impediment: Housing choices for special needs groups, especially persons with disabilities, are A. limited. Recommendation: 1. All jurisdictions should continue their efforts to expand the variety of available housing types and sizes. In addition to persons with disabilities, senior households, families with children, farmworkers,, and the homeless, among others, can also benefit from a wider range of housing options. Efforts: • ReLrion-wide. Most of the region's 19 j uris diction s, including Carlsbad, Chula Vista,, Coronado, Encinitas,, Escondido, La Mesa, National City, Oceanside, Poway, Santee, San Diego (City), San Diego (County), San Marcos, Solana Beach, and Vista have explicit recognition of their obligation to reasonably accommodate the housing needs of residents in the Municipal Code. • Chula Vista: The City's Community Housing Improvement Program allows for improvements that enhance accessibility. • Encinitas: The City's Rehabilitation Program specifically allows for improvements that enhance accessibility. The City's Reasonable Accommodation Ordinance was approved by Coastal Commission in March 2020. • Escondido: The City of Escondido is working collaboratively with different city departments, community based organizations,, including Interfaith, the Alliance for Regional Solutions, and the Regional Task for the Homeless to provide housing options for special needs populations. Additionally,the City will continue to work with the SDRAFFH to identify more housing choices. • National City: The National City Housing Authority maintains an affordable housing resource sheet that includes regional resources, emergency shelters, and low income rental- housing list, and housing available for seniors. • Oceanside: The Housing Authority launched a Landlord Incentive Program in Spring 2017 to encourage rental owners to lease to homeless veterans using VASH vouchers • San Diego City: The San Diego Housing Commission maintains an Affordable Housing Resource Guide that includes regional resources as well as an affordable rental-housing list specifying housing for disabled people within the City. The City of San Diego,in conjunction with the San Diego Housing Commission, has continued the "Housing Our Heroes" Campaign. The program follows the Housing First model by providing housing quickly, with supportive services added, to homeless Veterans, including those with disabilities. As part of the program,landlord outreach and education is being provided on Housing Choice Vouchers. • San Diego County: The County also provides a database of affordable rental housing and services throughout the County that is accessible to persons with disabilities. At,Pi,'��,,,MJA ..........(015 C-6 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,07 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A�,,W',A(SJS Of�� Imp'll�,�,��l)IN,l�,�l,�"�',,N'TS 1-10 FAIR I IOUSI,�111111�G oqo1R_')1(01`11,�'� • Santee: The City's Municipal Code (Chapter 17.10) provides for a wide range of housing (residential care facilities, congregate care facilities, single-room occupancy dwellings, limited and general group care facilities & transitional and support care facilities). Additionally, the Municipal Code (Chapter 17.06.055) provides for reasonable accommodation/residential accessibility. The City's rehabilitation program also specifically allow for improvements that enhance accessibility. • Vista: The City's Rehabilitation Program specifically allows for improvements that enhance accessibility. 10(l,"VI 0 I'll,S All S%C lill�np in'tents fil',motn, P111, lip ed jurisdictions in San Diego County have established various land use policies, zoning provisions, and development regulations that may impede the range of housing choices available. The following section outlines the recommendations made to each specific jurisdiction in the 2015 Regional Al in order to address their respective impediments. Carlsbad Recommendations: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. Efforts: The City of Carlsbad last updated the Density Bonus Zoning Ordinance in 2018. Chula Vista Recommendation: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for supportive housing, SRO housing, employee and farmworker housing, emergency shelters and large residential care facilities and density bonus pursuant to State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. Efforts: The City of Chula Vista amended various sections of Title 19 "Planning and Zoning" of the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code to address compliance with State laws governing supportive residential land uses (e.g. emergency shelters, single room occupancy residences, transitional and supportive housing, residential facilities, and qualified employee housing) was passed on October 16, 201 S. The City last updated its density bonus in 2013 (Ordinance 3250). Coronado Recommendation: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for employee housing. At,Pi,'��,111111,,MJA ..........(015 C-7 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,08 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FAIR I 10U'Sl,�111111�G Efforts: The City of Coronado has no ordinance to comply with the Employee Housing Act at this time. Del Mar Recommendation: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for SROs pursuant to State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for employee housing. Efforts:The City of Del Mar as of February 2020 has not updated its Zoning Ordinance for SROs or employee housing pursuant to State law. El Cajon Recommendation: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for supportive housing and SROs pursuant to State Law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for farmworker and employee housing. Efforts: The City amended its Zoning Code in 2018, adopting provisions for density bonus and accommodating for SROs to comply with 2019 changes in state law. The City of El Cajon permits farmworker and employee housing in the Zoning Ordinance in compliance with the Employee Housing Act. Encinitas Recommendation: 1. Make an effort to ensure that its current Housing Element is in compliance with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to permit emergency shelters by right in at least one zone to comply with State law. 4. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for supportive housing and SROs pursuant to State law. 5,. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for employee housing. Efforts:The City of Encinitas has an adopted Housing Element that is in compliance with State Law. The City Council adopted changes to the zoning ordinance for emerLyencv shelters in November 2019 ..........(0,15 C-8 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,09 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A�,,W',A(SJS Of�� Imp'll�,�,��l)IN,l�,�l,�"�',,N'TS 1-10 FAIR I IOUSI,�111111�G oqo1R_')1(01`11,�'� and then it was approved in February 2020 with modifications at the Coastal Commission. The City approved by-right in 2019 per SB 139 requirements. Provisions for employee and farmworker housing, transitional and supportive housing, and SRO housing, were adopted by City Council on November 20,, 2019 (Ord 19 — 14). The City also adopted reasonable accommodation provisions (Ord 19-15) and Single room occupancy provisions (Ord 19-16), adopted by Coastal Commission in March 2020. Escondido Recommendation: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for supportive housing and SRO pursuant to State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for farmworker and employee housing. Efforts: Escondido permits a caretaker's residence for farmworkers, deriving the majority of their income from employment on the premises in most residential zones that allow agriculture, but does not specify that farmworker employee housing is allowed in all zones where commercial agriculture use is permitted. The City of Escondido amended the Zoning Ordinance in 2017 to modify density bonus provisions and to provide provisions for supportive housing to comply with State law. Imperial Beach Recommendation: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for supportive housing and SRO Pursuant to State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for employee housing. Efforts: As of February 2020, the City of Imperial Beach has an amended zoning ordinance for supportive housing and SROs that complies with State law. The City has no commercial agricultural zoning but have ordinances in place that comply with the Employee Housing Act. La Mesa Recommendation: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to permit emergency shelters by right in at least one zone to comply with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include density bonus provisions that comply with State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for supportive housing and SRO pursuant to State law. 4. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for farmworker and employee housing. ..........(015) C-9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,10 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FAIR I IOUSI,�111111�G Efforts: The City of La Mesa updated its Zoning Ordinance to allow emergency shelters by right consistent with state law in 20�19. The City of La Mesa recognizes that it must update the Zoning Ordinance to address state requirements for supportive housing and SROs, but it has not been completed at this time. The City also recognizes the need to clarify the types of non-commercial agriculture activities allowable in the single-family zones to provide clear provisions for employee housing. Lemon Grove Recommendation: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include density bonus provisions that comply with State law. 2. Amend Zoning Ordinance to expressly permit transitional housing. 3. Amend Zoning Ordinance to permit emergency shelters by right in a specified zone. 4. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for supportive housing and SRO pursuant to State law. 5. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for employee housing. Efforts: The City of Lemon Grove last updated its Density Bonus Ordinance in January 2016. The City also updated its Zoning Ordinance to allow emergency shelters by right consistent with State law in 2019. National City Recommendation: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for employee housing. Efforts: National City last updated its Zoning Ordinance in 2009. Oceanside Recommendation: 1. Amend Zoning Ordinance to include a definition of"family" that does not impede fair housing choice. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with state law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to permit transitional housing, supportive housing, and SRO in compliance with State law. 4. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for farmworker and employee housing. Efforts: Oceanside amended its density bonus ordinance in June 2019.The City adopted an ordinance in 2018 to regulate farmworker housing. The City removed their definition of family. ..........(015) C-10 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,11 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL A�,,W',A(SJS Of�� Imp'll�,�,��l)IN,l�,�l,�"�',,N'TS 1-10 FAIR I 10U'Sl'�111111�G oqo1R_')1(01`11'�'� Poway Recommendation: 1. Amend Zoning Ordinance to permit emergency shelters by right in a specified zone. 2. Amend Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for supportive housing and SRO Pursuant to State law. 4. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for farmworker and employee housing. Efforts: The current Housing Element acknowledges the need to update the Zoning Ordinance to allow emergency shelters in compliance with state law. City of San Diego Recommendations: 1. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to permit emergency shelters by right in at least one zone to comply with State law. 2. Amend Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for farmworker and employee housing. Efforts: The City of San Diego last updated the Zoning Ordinance in 2016 to allow emergency shelters by right consistent with state law. In late fiscal year 2016, the Mayor launched the Housing San Diego Plan that outlines several goals and strategies to be developed over the next year to help increase housing production in the City. The Plan focuses on streamlining processes of certain permits through self-certification program, simplification of fee structures, improving customer service training, and new tools for developing additional housing. County of San Diego Recommendation: 1. Amend Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for supportive housing Pursuant to State law. 2. Amend Zoning Ordinance density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to provide provisions for employee housing. Efforts: The County of San Diego provides provisions for farmworker and employee housing. San Marcos Recommendation: 1. Amend density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for farmworker and employee housing. A t-,P i 1A [11)G R-1,d'S S S IN C Ed' 4(010 C-11 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,12 of 768 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FAIR I 10U'Sl,�111111�G Efforts: The City of San Marcos provides provisions for farmworker and employee housing. Santee Recommendations: 1. Amend density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for farmworker and employee housing. Efforts: The City of Santee Housing Element (2013 — 2020) establishes as a program goal changes to the Zoning Ordinance to achieve consistency with State housing law. Solana Beach Recommendation: 1. The City should evaluate its definition of family and revise the definition to ensure that it does not constrain the development of housing for persons with disabilities or residential care facilities. 2. Amend density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 3. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions for farmworker and employee housing. Efforts: The City currently has a definition of family that could be considered an impediment to fair housing choice. The City states that they see no need to specifically provide for farmworker and employee housing within the City. Vista Recommendation: 1. Amend density bonus provisions to be in compliance with State law. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions employee and farmworker housing. Efforts: The City updated its Zoning Ordinance to comply with the Employee housing Act for employee housing and to permit farmworker housing. .......... C-12 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,13 of 768 IN III til C1TY' C,0UNC'1L A,GEN' DA S,TIA, "nEMENT CITY, OF ..................................... CHUIAVISTA June 23,202�O File,ID: 20-0229 'TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA HOUSING AUTHORITY (1) APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET TO REPROGRAM $250,000 OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUNDS (LMIHAF); (2)APPROPRIATING L,MIHAF IN THE AMOUNT'OF $250)000 TO A HOMELESS PREVENTION AND, RAPID RE-HOUSING PROGRAM IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19; (3) AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ADDING HOMELESS PREVENTION AS AN ELIGIBLE USE OF LMIHAF (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Housing Authority adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On March 12, 20,19, the Chula Vista City Council (Resolution #2020-098) approved a Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program using $1,036,425 in HOME Investment Partnership funds from the U.S. Department of Housing for households who have suffered a direct financial impact resulting from COVID-19. Due to the overwhelming demand,staff recommends additional funding from the Low-and-Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds (LMIHAF) that can be used for a Homeless Prevention Program (HPP) that provides rental and utility assistance for the months of March-May 2,020 and June 2020 for eligible households e�arnina less than fifty percent of the area median income. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activities for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed activities are not considered "Projects" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the action consist of a governmental funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity, is not site specific, and will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. Therefore, pursuant to Section15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines,these activities are not subject to CEQA. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. 1111. 0 0 1 PIi3ge 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,14 of 768 DISCUSSION Due to COVID�-19, many renters are facing an undue financial hardship due to job loss, furlough or layoff, reduction in hours or work or pay, closure of places of employment, or missed work to care for a family member affected by the pandemic. Recognizing the economic vulnerability of Chula Vista residents and to respond to a public health crisis that would be exacerbated should residents be evicted and become homeless, City Council adopted an Eviction Moratorium on March 17, 2020 consistent with the Governor Newsome's Executive Order. On May 26, 2�O2�O by Emergency Ordinance No. 3489-A, Council extended this Moratorium through June 30, 2020. In balancing the needs of rental property owners and those of lower income households suffering the financial effects of COVID-19 and lacking resources,City Council on May 12, 2020 by Resolution 2020-098 approved the use of'$1,036,425 in its federal HOME funds for a Tenant Based Rental Assistance, (TBRA) program to be operated by South Bay Community Services., Upon announcement of the TBRA program,SBCS spoke to more than 120 persons within the first few hours, with many more messages left on their voicemail. Within the first two days, SB,CS closed its interest list as the number of persons seeking rental assistance far exceed the funding available. To date�, SBCS has pre- screened 140 households for program eligibility. The economic environment of California has yet to see improvement with the unemployment rate rising to a record 15.5 percent in April 2020 and an unprecedented 2,344,700 nonfarm jo�bs lost (California Employment Development Department, May 22, 2020 at https-,//edd.ca.2rov'/newsroom/unemployment- may-,20201.htm). Chula Vista's lower income households continue to be financially impacted and at risk of homelessness. At this time,there is available funding from the Low- and-Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds (LMIHAF) that can be used for a Homeless Prevention Program(HPP). Regulations of the L,MIHAF restrict the maximum amount of funds for HPP to $250,000 and will require the expenditure prior to Fiscal Year end. Due to, the overwhelming demand for rental assistance, Staff is proposing the allocation of the $250,000 available for TBRA for the speclific,purposes of homeless prevention and amendment of the existing contract with SBCS to add such funding. The Program will provide short term rental assistance funds through June 30, 2020 to qualified low income households earning less than 8,0% of the Area Median Income financially impacted by COVID�-19. Clients can receive a maximum assistance of $6,500 ($3,250 for mobile home residents) that can be used towards rental arrears (March-May 2020) and for,June's rent. The assistance will allow eligible households to remain in place and be current with their rent obligations. Examples of impact(s) by COVID�-19 include but are not limited to the following: • job loss,furlough or layoff • Reduction in hours,of work or pay • Store,restaurant or office closure • The need to miss work to care for a home-bound,school age child or elderly person • Victim of Domestic Violence P �3ge 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,15 of 768 Program Guidelines • The program is designed to benefit households earning less than 80%of'the area median income that are directly impacted by CO�VID�-19 and are in danger of being evicted due to COVID-19 related job/income loss. • Eligible tenants will have the assistance paid directly to the landlord or utility company,benefitting the tenant and the landlord. 0 The rent must be considered current by the landlord after receipt of the grant payment. • The grant will be calculated based on the amount of rent owed and the tenant's ability to pay a portion of the past due rent. Rental arrears are eligible. • Applicants will be required to provide documentation of their income and eligibility which may include check stubs,bank statement and/o�r a letter from their employer. • Funding assistance will be limited to rental units within the City of Chula Vista. • The Program Administrator will work closely with local service providers when identifying clients. DIECISIOM-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-spe�cific and consequently, the real property holdings of the Housing Authority members do not create a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cat. Govt Code§87100,et seq.). Co�uncilmember McCann may, however, have a conflict of interest given his ownership interest in rental property and property management business. Otherwise,Staff is not independently aware and has not been informed by any other City Council member,of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund as Project costs of$250,000 are covered by the available Housing fund balance. ONGOING FISCAL IMPAC oil There is no ongoing fiscal impact since program funds must be spend by June 30, 2020. Any monitoring of oversight of the program is covered by the Low and-Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund. X'"I'TACHMENTS Attachment 1: SBCS C�ontract Amendment Staff Contact:Jose Dorado,Senior Man agemen t Analyst, Housing Authority P �3ge 3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,16 of 768 HOUSING AU'THOR1TY RESO NO. 2020- RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA HOUSING AUTHORITY (1) APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET TO REPROGRAM $250,000 OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUNDS (LMIHAF); (2) APPROPRIATING LMIHAF IN THE AMOUNT OF $25000 TO A HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID RE-HOUSING PROGRAM IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19; (3), AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ADDING HOMELESS PREVENTION AS AN ELIGIBLE USE OF LMIHAF WHEREAS, a significant portion of Chula Vista renters (59%) are lower income, with 44 percent of them paying more than 50 percent of their income towards housing costs; and WHEREAS, due to the COVID-19 pandemic,many of these renters are facing an undue financial hardship due to job loss, furlough or layoff, reduction in hours or work or pay, closure of place of employment, or missing work to care for a family member affected by the pandemic, adding to their financial burdens; and WHEREAS, as the Chula Vista Housing Authority("Housing Authority"), acting as the Successor Housing Agency and has available fund balance in the Low- and- Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF) to provide housing assistance and expand housing opportunities to low income households; and WHEREAS, Homeless Prevention is an eligible use of LMIHAF pursuant to Section 341,76 of the Health and Safety; and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Housing Authority, acting as the Housing Successor has fulfilled all obligations pursuant to Sections 33413 and 33418, and may expend up to two hundred fifty thousand dollar's ($250,000) per fiscal year pursuant to Health and Safety Code 34176.1, for homeless, prevention for individuals and families who would be homeless but for this, assistance, including the provision of short-term or rental ass,istance, ho�using stabilization services including outreach to property owners, utility payments, case management, or other appropriate activities for homelessness prevention who are at risk of becoming homeless. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,17 of 768 Resolution No. Page 2 WHEREAS, the Housing Authority will reprogram current year(2019-2020) LMIHAF in the amount of$250,000 for a Homeless Prevention Program (HPP); and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has an existing agreement with South Bay Community Services for the provision of a Tenant Based Rental Assistance ("TBRA")program to assist low income households financially impacted by COVID-19; and WHEREAS, Staff has determined that the proposed activities are eligible for LMIHAF funds; and, WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Housing Authority has available fund balance to support this program to aid eligible households who have suffered an economic loss due to COVID-19. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Commissioners of the Chula Vista Housing Authority as follows: 1. That it approves an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Housing Authority Budget to reprogram Low and Moderate Housing Asset Funds in the amount of$250,000. 2. That it authorizes the appropriation of$250,000 of LMIHAF for a Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program. 3. That it authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute any and all agreements and necessary amendments for the management and implementation of a Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program for the purpose of homeless prevention for low income Chula Vista residents by South Bay Community Services using FY 2019/20�20 LMIHAF, and it further authorizes the City Manager or designee to make such minor modifications as may be approved or required 'by the City Attorney to ensure the Housing Authority meets the LMIHAF's requirements. Presented by: Approved as to form by: Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Development Services Director City Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,18 of 768 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,19 of 768 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM This First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and South Bay Community Services for a Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program ("FIRST AMENDMENT") is entered into effective as of June -1 2020 ("Effective Date") by and between the Chula Vista Housing Authority ("CVHA"), a chartered municipal, corporation, and South Bay Community Services, a non- p�rofit organization, ("Subrecipient" or "Contractor") (collectively the "Parties"), with reference to the following facts: A. Pursuant to Council Resolution Number 2020-098, on May 12, 20202, City Council approved the HUD Annual Action Plan Amendment which includes funding for Subrecipient to administer a Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) using HOME funding in the amount of$1,000,000 with options to extend through June 30, 2022; and B. The City and Subrecipient entered into an agreement ("Original, Agreement") on May 131 2020 to provide "Tenant Based Rental Assistance" to eligible households, who have been affected by COVI D-19; and C. An additional $250,000 in Low- and- Moderate Income Housing Asset funds from the CVHA are available to assist additional eligible households who are at risk of becoming homeless due to COVID-19 that were detailed in City Council Agenda Item 20-0152 and Resolution No. 2020-098. D. Subrecipient has dedicated staff resources to expend funding by June 30, 2020. A Budget is included in Exhibit A, Eligible uses in Exhib�it B, income Limits in Exhibit C, and a Payment Request Form in Exhibit D to this First Amendment; and NOW, THERFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and for good valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties hereby acknowledge the parties agree to amend the Original Agreement (as previously amended), specifically incorporating Exhibits A, B1 C and D via this First Amendment as follows: 1. The term of this First Amendment is June 23, 2020-�June 30�, 2020. Funding must be used to assist households that need homeless prevention assistance to pay rental arrears from March I, 2020-June 30, 2020. Funding can be used to assist up to 40 households. Exhibit A includes the Budget, Exhib�it B summarizes eligible used and identifies key difference between using HOME funding and Low-and-Moderate- C ity o f Chula Vi sta Amendment to Agreement No: 2 0 2 0-0 9 8 Consultant(Sub�recipient)Name: South Bay Community Services Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,20 of 768 Income Housing Asset funds (LOWMOD�). Attachment C includes the applicable income limits and Exhibit D includes the Payment Request Form. 2. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that it shall perform duties related to the Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program under the terms of the Original Agreement, as amended herein and the Amended Exhibits A-D. This First Amendment shall expire on June 30, 2020 and all beneficiary data must be submitted by July 30, 2020. 3. Notwithstanding any term to the contrary, Compensation and assistance shall not exceed the following: 0 $250,000 in Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Funding is made available to provide rental and utility ass,istance as a Homeless Prevention Program for the period of March I, 2020-June 30, 2020. 0 Assistance cannot exceed $6,500 per eligible bousehold that is occupying and leasing an apartment, condominium, or single-family bome. Households who are renting mobile home spaces,the maximum assistance is $3,250. 4. Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall, remain in. full force and effect after the expiration, of this First Amendment. 5. Each party represents that it has full right, power and authority to execute this Second Amendment and to perform its obligations hereunder, without the need for any further action under its governing instruments, and the parties executing this Second Amendment on the behalf of such party are duly authorized agents witb authority to do so. [End of Agreement; Next Page is Signature Page] C ity o f Chula Vi sta Amendment to Agreement No: 2 0 2 0-0 9 8 Consultant(Sub�recipient)Name: South Bay Community Services Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,21 of 768 SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM IN WITNESS WHEROF, by signing below the parties hereto enter into this Second Amendment as of the Effective Date. CITY OF CHULA VISTA & SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES CHULA VISTA HOUSING AUTHORITY By: By: Maria Kachadoorian Kathryn Lembo, City Manager President and CEO Approved as to form By#- Glen R. Googins, City Attorney Exhibits: A. Budget- Low Mod funds $250,000 B. Key difference between HOME and LOW MOD uses and eligibility criteria C. 2020 HCD-Income Limits D. Payment Request form C ity o f Chula Vi sta Amendment to Agreement No: 2 0 2 0-0 9 8 Consultant(Sub�recipient)Name: South Bay Community Services Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,22 of 768 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES Gity of CV TBRA Low Income Housing� 2019-20 Contract Annual %to One Moth PERSONNEL Salary Program Budget Department Director $ 147,851 5% 616 Program Director- G Schroeder $ 85,766 15% 11072 FSS Associate - M Ramirez $ 43,264 100% 31605 CCQA Staff $ 4%000 10% 408 Sub-Total Salaries 51702 FICA 21345 Sul 0 Pension 570 Health Insurance 696 Insurance W/Compen�sation 57 TOTAL PERSONNEL 9�,370, NON-PERSONNEL Mileage 522 Rental Asst 240,108 TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL 240,63�0, TOTAL DIRECT COST 2509000 NTI NG\CO NTRACTS\City of CV TBRA\1 Month Bgt$250,000.xlsx Page 6,23 of 768 EXHIBIT B: CITY OF CHULA VISTA RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19 LOW AND HOME REQUIREMENTS MODERATE CATEGORY HOUSING ASSET FUND REQUIREMENTS RENTAL TENANT BASED RENTAL HOMELESS PREVENTION ASSISTANCE TYPE ASSISTANCE ASSISTANCE REGULATIONS HOME PROGRAM 24 CFR CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND PART 92 SAFETY CODE 34176.1 INCOME LIMITS (USING INCOME Below 60% of the Area Below 80% of the Area Median LIMITS FOR SAN Median Income using HOME Income using HCD Income limits DIEGO COUNTY, Income Limits CALIFORNIA) March 1, 20�20 since thi's program EFFECTIVE DATE April 1.7,2020 as allowed by allows for rental arrears. OF ASSISTANCE HUD's waivers. ELIGIBLE RENTAL Meet Criteria per Policies ASSSISTANCE and Procedures Meet Criteria per Policies and APPLICANTS Procedures ELIGIBLE Apartment,townhome, Apartment,to�wnhome, PROPERTY condominium, single family condominium,single family home, home, manufactured home). manufactured home). Short'Term or Medium term through December 31,,2020. Short Term for the months of ASSISTANCE TERM Initial assistance cannot March,April,May, and June 2020 extend past December 31, only 2020 (see HUD waiver). TARGET AREAS City Wide City wide Subject to HOME program Subject to 1.20�% of the Fair RENT LIMITS Limits as determined by Market Rents for San Diego as HUD (Fair Market Rents) published by HUD. Families with children, Low income residents earning less PRIORITY GROUPS Victims of Domestic than 80�% of Area Media Income Violence, other vulnerable and other criteria per policies and 11 A 0 procedure population groups 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,24 of 768 EXHIBIT B: CITY OF CHULA VISTA RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS IN RESPONSE TO COVID-19 LOW AND MODERATE, HOUSING,ASSET FUND,, CATEGORY,,, HOME RIEQIUIRMENTS,,, REQUIREMENTS , Direct rental assistance and Direct rental assistance and utility ELIGIBLE USE(S) OF utility assistance in assistance in accordance with the accordance with the Policies and procedures for the ASSISTANCE FUNDS 0 Policies and procedures for TBRA program the TBRA program Not Permitted APPLICATON FEES Not Permitted Must commit and expend LOW EXPENDITURE Must commit and expend MOD funds by June 30,2020 and REQUIREMENTS HOME funds within the term submit expenditure and stated in thi's agreement beneficiary data reports by July 31, 2020. Subject to HOME 41 Up to $6,500 for eligible properties Program Limits and must I ASSISTANCE CAPS a *-I (see above). Manufactured Homes contrin�ute 30% of their the limit i's up to $3,250. Amount 0 income towards rent based on need. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS Refer to HUD Waiver Not subject to Inspection Cannot rent from a relative CONFLICT OF 24 CFR Part 92 (unless as a reasonable INTEREST accommodation for a person w ith a disability) I See Exhibit D of Contract REIMBURSEMENT Monthly Reimbursement Amendment 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,25 of 768 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA MSA 2020 Household Income Limits HLID Method Note:The following household income limits are adjusted for a high cost area as San Diego-Carlsbad,CA MSA $ 921700 per the Federal Housing Act of 1937 and calculated using HCD methodology to U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development comply with Health and Safety Code Sections 50052.5 and 50093. Aprill,2020 Effective Date Extremely Low Income 3 n,/ n'/ 0,40/0 35% 40,40/0 45% Hshold Size Annual Monthly 30.00% Annual Monthly 30.00% Annual Monthly 30.00% Annual Monthly 30.00% Income Income Monthly Income Income Monthly Income Income Monthly Income Income Monthly ONE $24,300 $2,025 $607 $28,350 $2,363 $708 $32,350 $2,696 $809 $36,400 $3,033 $910 TWO, $27,750 $2,313 $693 $32,400 $2,700 $810 $37,000 $3,083 $925 $41,600 $3,467 $1,040 THREE $31,200 $2,600 $780 $36,450 $3,038 $911 $41,600 $3,467 $1,040 $46,800 $3,900 $1,170 FOUR $34,650 $2,888 $866 $40,450 $3,371 $1,011 $46,200 $3,850 $1,155 $52,000 $4,333 $1,300 FIVE $37,450 $3,121 $936 $43,700 $3,642 $1,092 $49,900 $4,158 $1,248 $56,200 $4,683 $1,405 six $40,200 $3,350 $1,005 $46,950 $3,913 $1,173 $53,600 $4,467 $1,340 $60,350 $5,029 $1,509 EVEN $43,000 $3,583 1,075 $50,200 $4,183 $1,255 $57,300 $4,775 1,433 $64,500 $5,375 $1,613 EIGHT $45,750 $3,813 $1,143 $53,400 $4,450 $1,335 $61,000 $5,083 $1,525 $68,650 $5,721 $1,716_ Very Low Income Low Income 50% 60% 70% 80% Hshold Size Annual Monthly 30.00% Annual Monthly 30.00% Annual Monthly 30.00% Annual Monthly 30.00% Income Income Monthly Income Income Monthly Income Income Monthly Income Income Monthly ONE $40,450 $3,371 $1,011 $48,550 $4,046 $1,213 $56,600 $4,717 $1,415 $64,700 $5,39�2 $1,617 TWO, $46,200 $3,850 $1,155 $55,450 $4,621 $1,386 $64,700 $5,392 $1,617 $73,950 $6,163 $1,848 THREE $52,000 $4,333 $1,300 $62,400 $5,200 $1,560 $72,800 $6,067 $1,820 $83,200 $6,933 $2,080 FOUR $57,750 $4,813 $1,443 $69,300 $5,775 $1,732 $80,850 $6,738 $2,021 $92,400 $7,700 $2,310 FIVE $62,400 $5,200 $1,560 $74,850 $6,238 $1,871 $87,350 $7,279 $2,183 $99,800 $8,317 $2,49�5 six $67,000 $5,583 $1,675 $80,400 $6,700 $2,010 $93,800 $7,817 $2,345 $107,200 $8,933 $2,680 1, EVEN $71,650 $5,971 , 91 $85,950 $7,163 $2,148 $100,300 $8,358 2,507 $114,600 $9,550 $2,865 EIGHT $76,250 $6,354 $1,906 $91,500 $7,625 $2,287 $106,750 $8,896 $2,668 $122,000 $10,167 $3,050 Moderate Income 100% 110% 120% 140% Hshold Size Annual Monthly 30.00% Annual Monthly 30.00% Annual Monthly 30.00% Annual Monthly 30.00% Income Income Monthly Income Income Monthly Income Income Monthly Income Income Monthly ONE $64,900 $5,408 $1,622 $71,400 $5,950 $1,785 $77,900 $6,492 $1,947 $90,900 $7,575 $2,272 TWO, $74,150 $6,179 $1,853 $81,600 $6,800 $2,040 $89,000 $7,417 $2,225 $103,850 $8,654 $2,59�6 THREE $83,450 $6,954 $2,086 $91,800 $7,650 $2,295 $100,150 $8,346 $2,503 $116,850 $9,738 $2,921 FOUR $92,700 $7,725 $2,317 $101,950 $8,49�6 $2,548 $111,250 $9,271 $2,781 $129,800 $10,817 $3,245 FIVE $100,100 $8,342 $2,502 $110,150 $9,179 $2,753 $120,150 $10,013 $3,003 $140,200 $11,683 $3,505 six $107,550 $8,963 $2,688 $118,300 $9,858 $2,957 $129,050 $10,754 $3,226 $150,600 $12,550 $3,765 EVEN $114,950 $9,579 2,873 $126,450 $10,538 $3,161 $137,950 $11,496 $3,448 $161,000 $13,417 $4,025 EIGHT $122,350 $10,196 $3,058 $134,600 $11,217 $3,365 $146,850 $12,238 $3,671 $171,350 $14,279 $4,283 Note: Income levels 80%and below are adjusted by a HUD high cost area allowance. This general income information is calculated from the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)income figures.Specific program requirements may vary. Prepared by Affordable Housing Services Information, LLC @ 2020 Web:www.AHSinfo.com Phone(858)832-1460 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,26 of 768 ffff'Of C H U 1A V1 STA HOUSINGDIVISION REQUEST FOR ADVANCEMAYMENT AUTHORIZATION Name: South Bay Community Services Address: 4,30 �F' Street Cilty/Z,ip: Chu�l�a Vista,, CA 91910 Contact Information: Tax I D: Telephone: (619) 4,20-36201 x Funds be'ilng re�queste�d for: Home1ess, �P,reven�ti�on Assistance to e1igibille households, I request an advance for the follow�ing expenses List estimated costs: $ TOTAL ADVANCE REQUESTED $ 1 agree to submit an expe�nse statement by July 31 3 2,0120 along with the required receipts and to, refund any unused portion of the advance to the City of Chula Vista. Si�g�natu�re: Date: Submitted by: City Use Only M Funds released by Bud�get Category Bu�dgeted Amount Wire Number/ Amou�nt 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,27 of 768 BUDGET DETAIL AND PAYMENT PROVISIONS Disbursement Proces A. Payments to Subrecipient Contractor for a Homeless Prevention Program shall be on an advance basis. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, and upon submission of the required ad van ce request form and submission of any documentation required by the City. Contractor may obtain an advance of the total amount provided under this Agreement. As these funds are used for eligible expenditures, the Subrecipient Contractor shall forward all required documentation to the Contract manager by July 31, 2020. This procedure of advances shall continue until the total amount provided under this Agreement is expended and is subject to completion date deadline of June 30, 2020. B. The Department reserves the right to request copies of any documentation at any time prior to, or after the processing of any draw request. C. As a condition of the advance of funds for Homeless Prevention Assistance, Subrecipient Contractor shall submit the following for the City review and approval: 1) Application for Assistance 2) Program guidelines -Disencumbering Fu'nd Funds authorized by this Agreement shall be disencumbered in whole or in part if funds are not expended by June 30, 2020. Comgletii!2n 12ates This Agreement shall expire on June 30, 2020. All funds remaining unexpended upon termination shall be disencumbered from this Agreement. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,28 of 768 IN III til C1TY' C,0UNC'1L A,GEN' DA S,TIA, "nEMENT CITY, OF ..................................... CHUIAVISTA June 23,202�O File,ID: 20-0244 'TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 18M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3) CLARIFYING AMBIGUITIES IN THE RATE AND METHOD, OF APPORTIONMENT FOR SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF SUCH SPECIAL TAX, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR(4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED�AC'nON Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On June 3, 20201,the City received an appeal from HomeF'ed,challenging taxes assessed against a mixed-use site within Otay Ranch Village 3. The appeal was submitted pursuant to the appeal procedures set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment(RMA) for Community Facilities District(CFD) No�. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) and staff recommends Council take the following actions to clarify ambiguities in the RMA and made determinations regarding the appeal: 1. Levy Special Tax for parcels 644-061-08 and 644-0611-09 based on the Multi-Family Property designation and classify the non-rlesidential portion of mixed-use property as Exempt Property for tax year 2019-,20 and thereafter. 2. Determine that HomeFed shall receive a refund in the amount of$64,997.94 for the overpayment of special taxes in fiscal year 2019-20. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director offlevelopment Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project 1) as defined under, Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore,pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines,the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus,no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. 1111. 0 0 1 PIi3ge 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,29 of 768 DISCUSSION On November 15, 2016 the City Council in its capacity as the legislative body of CFD No. 18M (the"District"), adopted Ordinance No. 3381 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the D�istrict to fund the maintenance of landscaping,storm water,walls,fencing and trails within Otay Ranch Village 3,. The City has received an official notice of appeal from Development Planning&Financing Group dated June 4, 2020 on behalf of HomeFed Corporation ("Developer") requesting that the City reconsider its determination of the CFD No. 18M special taxes levied on the Village 3 mixed-us e/community purpose site for tax year 2019-20 and thereafter (Attachment 1). The site consists, of two lots 644-061-08 and 644-061- 09 (the "Affected Lots"). Developer asserts that the intent of the, RMA was to levy the special tax for the, Affected Lots based on the Multi-Family Property designation. only, rather than the both Multi-Family Property and the Non-Residential Property designations. City staff has reviewed the formal appeal and consulted with the Developer,outside counsel (Best, Best and Kreiger) and the City's CFD Administrator (Sp�icer Consulting Group). Staff concurs with the recommendations of the CFD Administrator set forth in his letter dated June 9, 2020 (Attachment 2)that: 1) the Affected Lots be taxed only based on the, Multi-F'amily Property designation and that the no�n-residential portion of mixed-use property should be classified as Exempt (as defined in the RMA) and 2) that the Developer shall be refunded the overpayment amount of$64,997.94. The CFD Administrator has determined that there are adequate funds generated by the annual special tax levy to issue this refund and meet the current and future maintenance obligations of the district. Based upon the preliminary budget included in the RMA and the initial calculation of the special tax levy by land use,the proposed clarification and refund will bring the total levy for the CFD in-line with the original formation assumptions. The district will continue to collect sufficient funds to meet maintenance obligations. Further, this change does not increase the levy of taxes on other properties within the district, as they will continue to be assessed pursuant to the RMA. The RMA for CFD 18M (Attachment 3) provides for"the City Council or its designee to interpret the Rate,and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for purposes of clarifying any ambiguities and make determinations relative to the administration of the Special Tax and any landowner appeals." Therefore, staff recommends that the Council adopt a resolution to clarify that the levy of special tax for the Affected Lots shall be based solely on the Multi-Family Property designation and that the non-residential portion of the mixed-use property should be classified as Exempt for the 2,019-2,0 tax levy and thereafter and to refund the Developer $64)9�93. DECISION,MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 1,000 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action.Consequently,this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 187022(a)(7) or (8), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Go�vt Code §8,7100, et seq.),. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURREN"Ir-YEAR,FISCAL IMPACT In the current year the City will recover the full cost of staff and contractor time via the special tax collected for district administration activities, resulting in no net fiscal impact to the General Fund or Development P �3ge 12 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,30 of 768 Service Fund., The resolution appropriates $64,997.94 from the availab�le fund balance of CFD No. 18M. There are,sufficient funds available to issue this refund without impacting service delivery within the District. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Approving the resolution limits the assessment of special taxes on the Affected Lots to the Multi-Family designation only in all future levies. This change is consistent with the original budget of the District. AT rACHMEN rs 1. CFD 18M Appeal Letter (6-4-2,02,0) 2. CFD 18M Memo from Spicer Consulting Group (6-9-2,02,0) 3,. CFD 18M Special Tax Report Staff Contact: Kim Elliott, Facilities Financing Manager P �3ge 3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,31 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 18M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3) CLARIFYING AMBIGUITIES IN THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF SUCH SPECIAL TAX, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR WHEREAS, the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Chula Vista, California (the "City"), has previously undertaken proceedings to form Community Facilities District No 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) (the "District") and designated territory proposed to be authorized to be annexed to the District in the future pursuant to the provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") and the City of Chula Vista Community Facilities District Ordinance enacted pursuant to the powers reserved by the City of Chula Vista under Sections 3, 5 and 7 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State of California to finance certain authorized services (the "Services"); and WHEREASI the qualified electors of the District, voting in a special election held on November 8, 2016, approved the authorization to levy special taxes,within the District pursuant to a rate and method of apportionment of such special taxes for the District (the"RMA") attached as Exhibit D to the community facilities district report (the "CFD Report") submitted to the City Council on November 8, 2016 pursuant to Section 53321.5 of the Act and attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the formation of the District and such election, HomeFed Corporation ("HomeFed"), the owner of a mixed use/community purpose facility site within the District consisting of Assessor Parcel Numbers 6,44-061-08-00 and 644-061-09-00 (the "Affected Lots"), has consulted with the CFD Administrator (as defined in the RMA) and filed a written notice of appeal with the City Council(the"Appeal")pursuant to Section G of the RMA regarding the City's determination of the amount of the special tax that will apply to the Affected Lots under the RMA in Fiscal Year 2019-20 and thereafter; and WHEREAS, the District was formed to provide the Services according to a budget with allocations for various anticipated land uses classes within the District, such allocation was demonstrated in Exhibit C ("Exhibit C") of the CFD Report; and WHEREAS, the Appeal requested that the special tax applicable to the Affected Lots in Fiscal Year 2019-20 and thereafter be determined based upon only designating the Affected Lots only as Multi Family Property,rather than as Multi-Family Property and Non-Residential Property (as defined in the RMA); and WHEREAS, Exhibit C shows the intent to levy the special tax on the Affected Lots only as Mulli-Family Property, but Section B of the RMA creates an ambiguity because of language regarding the application of special taxes for property with more than one Land Use Class (as defined in the RMA); and 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,32 of 768 WHEREAS, Section G of the RMA provides that the City Council shall interpret the RMA for purposes of clarifying any ambiguities and make determinations relative to the administration of the special tax and any landowner appeals and the City Council desires to clarify the ambiguity in the RMA and make determination relative to the administration of the special tax on the Affected Lots. NOW, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 18M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3), AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Clarif ying Ambiguities in the RMA. The City Council hereby clarifies that special tax applicable to the Affected Lots for Fiscal Year 2019-20 and thereafter shall be determined based upon designating the Affected Lots,as Multi Family Property and should exclude designating the Affected Lots as Non-Residential Property. SECTION 3. Making Determinations Regarding the Ap eal. The City Council hereby determines that the District shall refund HomeFed the amount of the overpayment of special taxes in Fiscal Year 2019-20 as the result of the levy on the Affected Lots as Non-Residential Property. SECTION 4. Aipiproipriatint4 Funds. The City Council hereby appropriates $64,,997.94 from the available fund balance of CFD No. 18M and authorizes refund of same to HomeFed. Presented by Approved as to form by Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Developmental, Services City Attorney A-1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,33 of 768 27127 CALLE ARROYO, SUITE igao SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 DPI G TEL (949)388-9269 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING & FIN�AN�CIN�G GROUP, INC. FAX(949)388-9272 www.dpfg.com Memorandum To: Tiffany Allen Development Services Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 919 10 CC: Curt Smitb —HomeFedl Steve Leveson - HomeFed From-, Peter Piller, Managing Principal Date: June 41, 2020 Dear Tiffany: On behalf of HomeFed Corporation ("HomeFed"),the owner of the mixed use/community purpose facility site within Otay Ranch Village 3. The mixed use/community purpose site consisting of APN 644-061-08- 00 and 644-061-09-00 ("Affected Lots") are included within City of Chula Vista CFD No. 18M (44CFD 18M") established to fund the maintenance and replacement of landscaping, storm water,walls and fencing and trails. I am writing pursuant to Section G of the Rate and Metbod of Apportionment for CFD 18M (tbe "RMA")to appeal the City's determination of the amount of the Special Tax that will apply to the Affected Lots under the RMA in Fiscal Year 2019-20 and thereafter. (Capitalized terms used in.this letter shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the RMA unless otherwise defined herein.), For the reasons described below, Ho�meFed requests that the Special Tax applicable to the Affected Lots in Fiscal Year 2019-20 be determined based upon the Multi-Family Property designation per the RMA on the Affected Lots, rather than,the Multi-Fam,ily Property and Non-Residential. Property designation. CFD No. 18M was formed to generate funding to meet the budget negotiated with HomeFed totaling $1,,591,750 for the 2016/17 fiscal.year. The budget was allocated to the various anticipated land uses within. CFD No. 18M to determine the special tax rates required by land use. This allocation is demonstrated in Exhibit C of the CFD Report for CFD No. 18M prepared by Willdan (see attached Exhibit Q. Exhibit C clearly shows that the I*ntent of CFD No. 18M was to levy a special tax on the Multi-Family Property. Unfortunately, the text of the RMA is not clear and can, be interpreted to conflict with Exhibit C. Further, there is a sufficient amount of Multi-Family Property that can be levied to generate the full intended amount of the special tax without also levying the special. tax on,the Affected Lost as Non-Residential Property. On b�ehalf of HomeFed, we are asking the City Council interpret the RMA consistent with the initial intent when, CFD No. 1,8M was formed and to provide a refund of$64,9�9�3 as determined in.the table below. Total CFD No. 18 M Levied (Affected Lots) $10M51 Levy Applicable to Multi-Family Property Only 351358 -Over Levy (Requested Refund) $64� If you need any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Peter Piller Managing Principal 35 OTAY LAND-VILLAGE 3 CrrY OF CHULA VISTA DERIVATI ON OF E STIMATED MAINTENANCE SPE CIAL TAX BA SED ON EDU'S F OR ENTIRE VILLA GE S*ternh er 22,20 16 LAND USE EqFORMATION Maintmazwe SpecialTax Analysis Total Total Total Total A7mu3l Araual Estiniated Resideatial Alm-ual Annual Annual SO ecial Tax SpecialTax Total Net Product Unk Square EDU Total Sip ec ial Tax Sp ec ial Tax SpecialTax (Repakemmt per Unit Prod act Type units Acres Typ e Shr Feet Factor EDUs (Irotal) 11'abor) ffater) Costs) 9 r Acre Residential A ALe yRo-TH w�Faho 107 TH 1,450 155,150 0.20 S6 129,195 $ 78,OSI $ 29,226 $ 21,3M $ 1,207 B Tiiplex 32 T H 1,550 111,600 020 58 86,935 52,540 1.9,666 14,729 1,2N C bbtorcourl 6 Pac III TH 1,950 216,450 0.20 S9 134,024 21,000 30,313 22,70 1,207 ID 34 x 79 Alley 122 SFD 1,950 233,900 100 122 184,133 11.1,283 41,653 31,196 1,509 E 44 x 62 162 SFD 2,050 332,100 1.00 162 244,504 147,770 55,310 41,424 1,509 F 48 x 65 130 SFD 2,400 312,000 1.00 130 196,207 118,581 44,395 33,242 1,509 G 43 x 75 135 SFD 2,650 35�,750 1.00 135 203,753 123,141 46,092 34,520 1,509 H 50 x 90 77 SFD 2,950 227,150 1.00 77 116,215 70,236 26,299 19,689 1,509 1 55 x 90(3 car tan&rft) �6 SFD 3,150 239,400 1.00 76 114,706 69,324 25,943 19,434 1,509 MU resikntiaDApts. 273 Aim. 933 254,709 0.08 22 32,963 19,922 7,457 5,585 121 ofrif:a �-90 office 400 32 43,693 29,924 1.0,799 9,020 6,03� I rdustrial 16.8 mustial 4.00 67 101,424 61,297 22,943 17,183 Total 1,265 24.7 2,444,209 1,055 1,591,750.19 $ 961,999.56 $ 360,074,93 $ 269,675.68 Total MaimtmaRce Budget(as of August lst 2016 Budget) $ 1,591,750.10 $ 961,999.56 $ 360,074.93 $ 269,675.60 Total EDUs 1,054.64 1,054.64 1,054,64 1,054,64 Cost Per EDU $ 1,509.28 $ 912.16 $ 341.42 $ 255.70 EDU Factor(1.0) $ 912.16 $ 341.42 $ 255.70 EDU Factor(80) $ 729.73 $ 273.14 $ 2M56 EDU Factor(00) $ 72.97 $ 27.31 $ 20.46 EDU Factor(4.0) $ 3,640.64 $ 1,365.60 $ 1,022.02 N, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SPICER CONSULTING 41619 Margarita Road, Suite 10,11 Tekmecula,, CA 9,25,91 866.504.20,67 wwwspicercg.com G R 0 U P a '0 b A a ®r 40 do go 9 A A A A A 0 1 40 Ms.Tiffany Allen City of Chula Vista Page 2" for both the multi-family property and non-residential property Land Use Classes. The special tax rate for�multi-family property is $129.917 per unit and the non-residential property rate is $6,499.79 per acre. Parcel 644-061-018-00 includes 33 apartment units and is 1.81 acres. The total tax for the multi-family property is$4,289.12 and $11,764.63 for non-residential property for a total parcel tax of$16�,053.75. Parcel 644-061-09-00 includes 239 multi-family units and is 8.19 acres.,The total tax for the multi-family property is$31,063.64 and $53,233.31 for non-residential property for a total parcel tax of$84,296.95., The total tax for the Affected Lots is$100,350.70 for FY 2019-20. Given the omittance of the non-residential acreage from the preliminary budget, included in the CIFID Report, it is reasonable to conclude that there is ambig�uity in the RMA and the special tax was not intended to apply to non- residential property in the Affected Lots. It,is reasonable to not levy the special tax on non-residential property within the Affected Lots in the FY 2019-20 special tax levy and going forward. Additionally, the other properties within CFD 18M will not be harmed by removing the non-residential property within the Affected Lots from the annual special tax calculation. Based on the information available in the CFD Report and the RMA for CFD1 18M we recommend the following: Obtain approval by the City Council of a resolution clarifying the exclusion of the non-residential portion of the Affected Lots from the Special Tax calculation for CIFID 18M for FY 2019-20 and future years. After adoption of the resolution refund or credit to future CIFID 18M levies of HomelFed properties the IFY 2019-20 overpaid special tax amount of 64,997.94 from the City's CFD 18M fund. Only include the special tax levy for the multi-family property within the Affected Lots for future fiscal years. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or require additional information. Shane Spicer Managing Director Spicer Consulting Group CC: Kimberly Elliott, City of Chula Vista Nora O'Brien, BBK Warren Diven, BBK Melissa Bellifire, SCG 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,38 of 768 C iula V'is lillillita CFD Report Facillities District Nlo,,,,, 1811"0 (Otay Raincli Village 3) October 2016 ........... TABLE OF CON"ll..........EWIIIIIIIIIIS TABLE 017CONTENTS .I.,....I........ IN w 0 0 1 IN 0 0 1 IN 0 0 1 IN 0 a 0 IN 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 1 w 0 0 1 IN 0 0 1 IN 2 IN INTRODUCTION ......I....I....I.......................I....I....I....I...................I....I....1. 1 11. GENERAL DESCRIPTION & BOUNDARIES OF CFD, No. 18M .................21 I I IN, FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA ...I....I....I...................................................IN 3 IV. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES..........................................................IN 4 V. COST ESTIMATES ........................................................................IN 5 VI. RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX ...............6 EXHIBIT A (BOUNDARY MAP)............a 0 a IN 0 0 a IN 0 0 a IN a 0 a IN a a a 0 a a a a 0 a a a 0 a a a 0 a IN 0 0 a IN a 0 a IN a 0 a 9 EXHIBIT B (FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA) .......... I...............I....I............ 1 EXHIBIT C (PRELIMINARY BUDGET)........................................................... 13 EXHIBIT �D (RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT) ............................ 15 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 6,40 of 768 lei In'trodUction WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista (hereinafter referred to as the "City Council"), in the State of California, did, pursuant to the terms and provisions of Chapter 2.5 of Part 11 of Division 2. of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, as amended (the "Act"), adopted a Resolution of Intention for the proposed formation of City of Chula Vista Community Facilities District No. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) ("CFD, No. 16-1")., WHEREAS, this Community Facilities District Report ("Report") is being provided to the City Council and generally contains the following: 1. A brief description of Community Facilities District No. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) of the City of Chula Vista ("'CFD NO., 18M""); 2. A brief description of the public services (the ""Services") which are required to adequate�ly to meet the needs of CFD No. 18M. 3. A brief description of the Boundaries of CFD 18M; and 4. An estimate of the cost providingsuch Servi'ces,, as defi'ne,d below, including all costs assoc,iated with formation of the District, determination of the amount of any special taxes, collection of any special taxes, or costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the City with respect to the District, and any other incidental expenses to be paid through the proposed financing. For particulars,, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention,, Resolution No. 2016-199 as previously approved.All capitalized terms not defined herein are defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Specia�l Tax section (Exhibit D) of th�is report., NOW THEREFORE Willdan Financial Services, the appointed responsible firm directed to prepare the Report, pursuant to the provisions of the Code, does hereby submit the following: 202*2�3VFY PWY of 768 Page a 1, General Descr`iptilon & Boundari I es ofCFD No. 181\4 The proposed boundaries of CFD 18M encompass parcels, located within O�tay Ranch in the City of Chula Vista, San Diego. Otay Ranch Village 3 is a�pproximately four hu�ndred and twenty-three (423) acres located just south and east of the O�tay Landfill and Village Two, west of the existing light industrial uses in the C,ity of Chula Vista and north of the, Otay River Valley. The project is proposed for approximately 702 s,ingl�e-family units and 563 multi-family units, 7.,9 acres of office use,, and 16.8 acres of industrial use. A description of the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed for inclusion in CFD No. 18M,, includi'ng properties and parcels of land proposed to be subject to the levy of a Special Tax by CFD No. 18M. is shown on the boundary map designated as "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 18M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3)11 1 which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, and which was recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego on October 11,, 2,016 in Book 46 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 5, as Instrument Number 2016-7000436. A copy of the map is attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby incorporated by reference. The Boundary Map also depicts an area designated as the Future Excluded Area which is intended to be excluded from CFD, 18M upon recordation of final parcel maps for the area. This area is currently included within the boundaries of CFD 18M because the Future Excluded Area does not currently exist as a separate legal parcel, but is a part of the legal parcel identified on the Boundary Map as Assessor's Parce,l No. 644-060-27-00., When this area becomes a separate legal parcel, action will be taken to remove it from the CFD. 202*2�3VFY PV 6�768 Page I I I III F tA t u e A i,i n e x a It ii o n A e a On October 4. 2016 the Resolution of Intention of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista to allow for future annexation of territory to City of Chula Vista Community Facilities District No. 18M (Otay Ranch Vil�lage 3) was adopted. Resolution No. 2016-199 gave the City the ability and option to a�nnex future development projects into CFD No. 18M, and to do so in an expedited manner., The Future Annexation Area was established so that property adjacent to CFD 18M., that may be developed at some point i'n the future, and which may i,nc,lude maintenance and service req�uirements substantially similar to those in the existing CFD 18M., could be annexed to CFD 18M. This would occur if it is determined that the existing tax rate structure for CFD 18M can be fairly and equitably applied to this area, and that it will generate suffi'cient revenue to fund the req�uired maintenance and services for this area. A description of the exterior boundaries of the future annexation area is as shown on the boundary map designated as "FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO,. 18M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3)11 1 which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, and was recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego on October 11, 2016 in Book 46 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at page 6, as Instrument Number 2016-70,00437. A copy of the map is attached hereto as Exhibit B and hereby incorporated by reference. Future developments may be annexed into CFD No. 18M upon the petition by, and the approval of, the owner or owners of any such parcel(s) at the time annexation is requested. A public hearing is required to count the votes and annex the parcel(s) into the pre-e�stablished district. 202*2�3VFV PV A 768 Page IV. Descriptian of Services The district will fund the maintenance and replacement of (a) landscaping, including, but not limited to, trees, slope�s, �parkways and medians; (b) faci'lities that are directly related to storm water,quality control; (c) walls and fe,nci'ng; and (d) trails. 202*2�3VFY PagpeV A 768 V, Cost Estidmates, The estimated annual budget for CFD 18M is approximately$1,591,750 which is shown in Exhibit C. This includes $1,284,555 for: landscape maintenance, including irrigation; inspection, operation and maintenance of storm water quality facilities; maintenance of walls, fencing, and trails, including graffiti abatement, and $269,676 that is set aside for the replaceme�nt of the amenities and fac,ilities as they reach the end of their useful life. In addition, the budget includes $37.5,19.60 for CFD administration (preparing reports, levying and collecting taxes, public assistance, etc.) by City Staff,. or their designee. 202*2�3VFV PagpeWR A 768 V1. Rate and Method of Appo�rtiiorirnervt of Speciallmax A. Overview All property located within CFD No. 18M,, unless exempted by law or specifically by the Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D and hereby incorporated by reference, shall be taxed for the purpose of providing necessary services to property withi'n CFD No. 18M. Pursuant to Section 53325.3 of the Act,,the tax imposed is a special tax and not a special assessment.Therefore,there is no requirement that the tax be apportioned on the basis of special benefit to any property., The special tax "may be based on a benefit received by parcels of real property, the cost of making fac,ilities or authorized services available to,each parcel,or some other reasonable basis as determined by the legislative body".The special tax may not be apportioned on an ad valorem basis pursuant to Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. B. General Explanation of Special Tax Apportiont'ner"it When a community facilities district is formed, a special tax may be levied on each parcel of taxable property within the CFD to pay for authorized services or to repay bonded indebtedness or other related expe�nses incurred by the CFD. When more than one type of land use is present, within a community facilities district, various criteria may be considered when apportioning a special tax. Generally, criteria based on building square footage, lot size, density, service population, and�/or land use are selected to establish categories to,differentiate between parcels of property.These categories are a direct result of the landowner/developer's projected product mix, and are reflective of the proposed land use types within that community facilities district. The major assumption inherent in the Special Tax rates set forth in the RMA is, that the level of benefit received from the proposed public services is a function of land use and�/or size of building. C. Structure of the [�ate and Method of Apportiomrnerit The RMA for CFD No. 18M is made up of a definitions section,, a descri'ptio�n of the tax rates, and the outline of the procedural steps required for calculating and apportioning the special tax. In ge,neral, the first step is to classify each parcel as either Taxable or Exempt. The second step is to then determine the applicable tax rate to be applied to each parce,l determined to be Taxable, based on its development status and land use, type. The third step is to apply the applicable Special Tax rates to developed properties until the, Special Tax Requirement is satisfied. The following diagram illustrates the ge,ner�al process of determining the applicable rate to be applied to each parcel withi'n CFD No. 18M: 202*2�3VFV PagpeWR h 768 hill -MENNEN= dik .0 40 dik AN m M M Ah Ah dik Am on oft Ab �D. MaximUni Special Tax Rates, The Maximum Special Tax Rates that may be levied on any parcel within the boundaries of CFD 18M. beginning with the Fiscal Year 20,17-2018 are shown below: Developed Special Tax �Rates The following rates are shown as a per unit basis., and are subject to an annual escalation as described in the �RMA. Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Special Tax Special Tax Special Tax Basis Special Tax Basis Land U�se Class Basis for Basis for for Asset La bor Water Replacement I Single Family $ 912.1,6 $341.42, 255.70 11509.28 Detached Property Single Family 729.73 $273.14 204.�56 1#4207.43 Attached Property Multi-Fam�ily 72.97 $27.31 20.46 120.74 Property Non�-Residential 31648.64 $11365.68 11022.82 6103 7'.13 Property Undeveloped Special Tax Rates No tax will be levied on undeveloped property. The Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA) for CFD 18M provides sufficient information to allow a property owner within CFD 1,8M to estimate the Maximum Special Tax for his or her property. It also includes method of prepayment in full or prepayment in part and the procedure for prepayments. For particulars on the rate and method of app�ortionment, reference is m�a�de to Exhibit D of this report. 202*2�3VFV PWR A 768 Page EXH I BIT A Boundary Map 202*2�3VFV PagPeWR A 768 'il 41TY'MA P --------- E7 I IF I �PROPOSED,BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. ISM AY R ANC14"VILLAGE,3) C11Y OF G11ULAVISI'A C0LJN'TY,0F,,%9,,A,N DIEG0,�STATE OF CALIFORNIA ij h-tim ljmy ilt�,Ookmt Lo lb*'C' ......................... ...................................................... ..............................-- cr om"P.&A O-Akv,, ........... I 4411"IWIlf,e I'll(Im F r I prok"I Pvjilt)m,4"010 rlk(l JAA h!V40"'t fi'v, Ch IRA)'; X-4,k' t! 111*0 t, Y10,KYRA A.'Al..1001 w, C�nl 4',01�iPCL Cr C ;�UX M1117104 lkt Wit PY) I'm wirl mcm 1tv"c"Al uir t,,,Rj tym J,,�0' d "W"r it 014)�o "r, PllIl Ii/cli C*01 W,/;o �Ifta k"'!Il Olt,Old qtk, ji .............. 'oe ..................... evem. ","IP f.d R, ��644*4 11117 ti ZWER;Kra 4 'l f4o ,, e,"Jm '1�1 Vt U D.C31,041311"Milh. )lVe 6l '11 ................ Omt.,11'"Ah,khro ok LIK QW NOWETIL, 6�e AD-0 wip iww� 5-1;mo,'vr�F�,A M/,'11, FrV 'T 4 , T04 4INkk *T 6 1;64's xxii iliai 4) .................. 4 JS r A UT Tki wMAP W Aldo Yll if4 F S lu XX%ftl: i'l,-;d C/ ;Wj';k,ym"t"It. h4,�j �m"la I CAS"'ll n�CA/,Of 14""'10,71"k PAW'S111 C4 ro;�Cg L r"'N")EM"Aqw-i 71 W q OPIK*61111144"T"C 11411li 4411"WWW14 Vp Or,PkX1,1f,ki 4;li(�,ILW W61 D]F44,N/1'114;1" ............../ 1"Ali VA14.11 T ........... 6'((.......hQ 16 6"L ................ �(d(( Legend MIA P"R,EFT RE N CT' A,555F, ODR,�'lR' ,, Ull DIS 7 R K�7 13CH JNDARY N Q M3 F R NUMBER FUTURE, ,�2 6,1144,0601-2,&M wl L I..., MAP"RE1,if'EIMIN ENJUIVell , t AN V -0'S 17 , G),ii Z-OlIS ,3 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... I LLDAN Page 10 rciEd Services 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 6,50 of 768 EXHIBIT B Future Annexation Area (in 202*2�3VFV PaLlri Page,�"6�5 11olf 768 VI CAN 17"Y"VIIAP IMP, .......................... Milli FUTURE AN NEX C COMMUNITY FACILIT E S D'ItST R,,',"[, 'T'N 0. 1"),8 M (OTAY), R ANCH VILLA.CE 31) C "',OF'Cl,,fULA,,,VISTA,, ITY , ' "t " N At G C U t'll Y Of S,,',,A 01 0,S. ATE,0 A A daqll loj VilA."11"5f V4, A",11 T1,111j,l�)",il'i i k a i4m,101111'fkmo�r1UP"'41 6 1 ............ �:;O'VANL�p 11 PF"So k4 ............... ON FIF mir"'VI FAM Is Cp�''I�t 1,01,J)"I�jm I ffjw�jf,� ww)�ffl 4 T�, 0 c "I Avi'm o"fkf��;Co,I rd, ",#w........! md L �16'0`4,,AF R(/",M,ljF"'*t,%,,o)41-,1- 00,0,iwo'llp,!,I 1A IFT11044.i4fp� F (110"M 111,0 Z'Orr� no�l"Ill (),ol"e klllk� 60�U��il A I*j, I wilf"VI 4,10,0%�mi ro��Ill Mllu N, ........................................................................................................................................................... F�"",XIT NCO 1,0))woodh r�-,gl g W04 11 07' I'l A 11 VT KI all ............................... p,ulqp/,lkpm om .................... "'Pt(""A""N' IWIF KII,Ca I ot.lcel�,Af Pow "'r llllur�imm it, ol�,,!, lodmullwo it 4ml f 'F6 %,)m kk"ki 9,'ff#)g "Aw 4, L(1414�AjWJ P 9"AlkWilyrAm �i MAIMNIIIIIIN FA SAR Lmlw�,Q 1,22LAn'',F "/ �'Ill t�lhg(g Nr ItUL ............ e), A 1/44 Vll!',W", lif'A,'�O%�A�,V'fv��(Joolllj GIV plll#�el",��j ell P P dd"di )l .0),� 141 No'!Iti p I AA i&j VA wa,A I flawif"t q x4f"W*,f,'�3 D ho'!hwk,"bi["'Imma C"'T IP ld� .,V, I 1"It")) I , I'd rld- d U, J We' �i'pf. ...... J� e"I'le, d'1,��l. ..... Y ll�� V gp' ro, 11(" J1 P �)h' Logend M-A,F RE,,,,F,E.","I tE)N,C E AS,5 E!i 5 0,R FS I AM ARC I.,NUMMER, N 43 E",R P Lit "//....... I-00 Wl"I.-DAN F'wi i Semw 202W� EyAqqtl PRRgtZ-'A 7 6 8 10, Services EXHIBITC Preliminary CFD Budget 202*-(3WF p��49�31A 7 6 8 OTAY LAND-VILLAGE 3 CITY OF CHULA VISTA DERIVATION OFE MMATED MAINTENANCE SPECIAL TAX BASED ON EDU'S FOR ENTIRE VILLAGE Septmmbe:r 22,2016 ................ LAND USE INFORMATION Maintuiance Special Tax Analysis Total Total Total Total Annual Annual Esthaated Residential Annml Annual Annual e cial Tax SpecialTax Total Net Product Unit Square EDU Total ec ial Tax Sp cc ial Tax *ecialTax (Rep ak ement per Unit Product Type units Acres Type Size Feet Factor EDUs Crotab (LaLbor) (Water) Costs) orAcre Residential A AlIe yRo w TH wf Patio 107 TH 1,450 155,150 0.80 86 $ 129,195 $ 78,081 $ 29,226 $ 21,888 $ 1,207 B TrIple x �2 TH 1,550 111,600 0.80 2 86,935 52,540 19,666 14,�29 1,2M C, �&toycourt 6 pac III TH 1,950 216,450 0.80 89 134,024 81,000 30,318 22,707 1,207 D 34 x 79 Alley 122 SFD 1,950 237,900 1.00 122 184,133 111,2S3 41,653 31,196 1,509 E 44x 62 162 SFD 2,050 332,100 1.00 162 244,504 147,��O 55,310 41,424 1,509 F 48 x 65 130 SFD 2,400 312,000 1.00 130 196,207 118,581 44,385 33,242 1,509 G 48 x 75 135 SFD 2,650 357,750 1.00 135 203,753 123,141 46,092 34,520 1,509 H 50 x 90 77 SFD 2,950 227,150 1.00 77 116,215 70,236 26,289 19,689 1,509 1 55 x 90(3 cax tan&m) 76 SFD 3,150 239,400 1.00 76 114,706 69,324 25,94:3 19,434 1,509 MU re si&ntial y A pts. 2�3 Apt. 933 2 54,�09 0.08 22 32,963 19,922 �,45� 5,585 121 0 ffic e 7.90 office 4.00 32 47,693 28,824 10,789 8,080 6,037 Indwtdal I rdustrial 16.8 Ladusbial 4.00 67 101,424 61,297 22,943 17,183 Total 1,265 24.7 2,444,209 1,055 $ 1,591,750.18 $ 961,999.56 $ 360,074.93 $ 269,675.68 Total Maintenance Budget(as of August I st,2016 Budget) $ L591J50.18 $ 961�999.56 $ 36%074.93 $ 269fi75.60 ToWEDUs 1,054.64 1,054.64 1,054.64 1,054�64 Cost Per EDU $ U09.28 $ 912.16 $ 341.42 $ 255.70 EDU Factor(1.0) $ 912.16 $ 341.42 $ 255.70 EDU Factor(00) $ 729.73 $ 273.14 $ 204�56 EDU Factor(08) $ 72.97 $ 27.31 $ 20.46 EDU Factor(4.0) $ 3fi40.64 $ P65.60 $ L022.02 A ack(alt, PaFeqQR A68 HNEIHN14 X H I B I T D Rate and Metho�d of Apportionment 202*-(3WF p��49�51(�7 6 8 Rate and Method of Appoirti��onment of Special "'rax, Cilty of Cl���Iiula Vi"Ista 11 1�1111ty Faci��111 I b tie s D'i s"'It r 11 1 clit �110. 18M (Otay R&��pi[IC11111'1,1 IjVi�llage 3) A Special Tax as hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) of the City of Chula Vista and collected each Fiscal Year commencing with Fiscal Year 2017-18 i'n an amount determined by the CFD Administrator through the application of the procedures described below. All of the real property within CFD No. 18M, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes,, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided. A, DEFINITIONS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: "Acre"or"Acreage"'means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Subdivision Map, other final map, other parcel map, other condominium plan, or functionally equivalent map or instrume�nt recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. The square footage of an Assessor's Parcel i's equal to the Acreage multiplied by 43,560. "Act" means the �Mello-Roo�s Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. "Mministratlive Expenses" mean�s the actual or estimated costs incurred by the City, acting for and on behalf of the CFD as the administrator thereof, to determine, levy and collect the Special Taxes, including salaries of City employees a�nd a proportionate amount of the City's, general administrative overhead related thereto, and the fees of consultants and legal counsel providing services related to the administration of the CFD; the costs of collecting installments of the Special Taxes; and any other costs required to administer the CFD a�s determined by the City. "Assessor's Parcei" or"'Parcel" mea�ns a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor"s Pa�rcel Map with an assigned assessor's parcel number. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by assessor's parcel number. 202*-(3WF P��49�619 7 6 8 "'CFD Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. "'CFD No. 18M" or "CFD" means Community Facilities District, No. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) of the City of Chula Vista. "City" means the City of Chula Vista., "Community Purpose Facility Property" or "CPF Property" means all Assessor's Parcels whi'ch are classified as community purpose facilities and meet the requirements of City Ordinance No. 2883. "Construction Cost Index" means, for any Fiscal Year, the applicable Construction Cost Index for the City of Los Angeles as set forth in the Engineering News Record for July of such Fiscal Year. In the event that this rate is no longer pub�lished or provided, the CFD Administrator shall choose a comparable rate to use in its place. ""Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers" or "CPI-W" means the applicable C,PI-W as set forth by the U�nited States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for July of such Fiscal Year. In the event that this rate is no longer published or provided, the CFD Administrator shall choose a comparable rate to use, in its place. "Council" means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of the CFD�. 1_% "County" means the County of San Diego, ualifornia. "Developed Property" means all Taxable Property for which a building permit was issued prior to the March 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. "Dwelling Unit"' or "DU" means each separate residential dwelling unit that comprises an independent facility capable of conveyance or rental separate from adjacent residential dwelling units. ""Exempt Property" means all Assessor's Parcels within CFD No. 18M that are exempt from the Special Taxes pursuant to law or Section F �her�ein. "'Final Subdivision Map" means a subdivision of property creating residential or non-residential buildable lots by recordation of a final subdivision map or parcel map pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.), or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code, 1352,that creates individual lots for which building permits may be issued without further subdivision and is recorded prior to March 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax i's being levied. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1. 202*_(3WF P��49�717f 7 6 8 "Maximum Special Tax Basis" means the amount, determined in accordance with Section C below that represents the actual costs associated with providing the Services funded by CFD No. 18M. "Maximum Special Tax" means the maximum Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C below that may be levied in a ny Fisca I Yea r on a ny Assessor's Pa rcel of Taxa ble Property. "Multi-Family Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Residential Property consisting of two or more for-rent Dwelling Units that share common walls, including, but, not limited to, apartments and townhomes that are not for sale to an end user and are under common management. "Non-Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building pe�rmit(s) has been i'ssued for a structure or structures for non-residential use., "Otay Water District Commodity Rate" means the maximum rate charged by the Ot,ay Water District for recycled water on Ju�ly 11t of any Fisca�l Year. In the event that th�is rate is no longer p�ublish�ed or provided, the CFD Administrator shall choose a com�parable rate to use in its place. a "Prop�erty Owner Association Property" means any property within the boundaries of the CFD that is owned by, or irrevocably dedicated as indicated in an instrument recorded with the County Recorder to, a property owner association, including any master or sub-association. "Public Property" mea�ns a�ny property within the boundaries of the CFD that is, at the time of the CFD formation, expected to be used for any public purpose and is owned by or dedicated to the federal government, the State, the County, the City or any other public agency. "Reserve Fund" means a fund that shall be maintained for the CFD each Fiscal Year to provide necessary cash flow for the first six months of each Fiscal Year., working capital to cover monitoring, maintenance and repair cost overruns and delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes and a reasonable buffer to prevent large variations in annual Special Tax levies. "Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit(s) has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling unit(s). "'Services" means those authorized services that may be funded by CFD No. 18M pursuant to the Act as amended, including, without limitation, those services authorized to be funded by CFD No. 18M as set forth in the documents adopted by the City Council at the time CFD No. 18,M was formed., "Single Family Attached Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of for�-sale Residential Property consisting of one, or more Dwelling Unit(s) that share common walls with one, or more other Dwelling Unit(s),, including, but not limited to, duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, and condominiums. "S,ingle Family Detached Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Residential Property consisting of a single Dwelling Unit. "Special Tax" means the Special Tax levied pursuant to the provisions of sections C and D below in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property and Undeveloped Property in CFD No. 18M to fund the Special Tax Requirement. "Special Tax Requirement" means the amount, as determined by the CFD Administrator,for any Fiscal Year to: (i) pay the costs of providing the Services during such Fiscal Year, (ii) pay 202*_(3WF P�Rq�814 7 6 8 Administrative Expenses associated with the Special Tax, (iii) establish or replenish the Reserve Fund, (iv) pay incidental expenses related to the Services as authorized pursuant to the Act, (v) fund an amount equal to a reasonable estimate of delinquencies expected to occur in the Fiscal Year i'n which the Special Tax will be levied ("Estimated Special Tax Delinquency Amount") and (vi) fund the shortfall, if any, in the Special Tax revenues collected in the preceding Fiscal Year necessary to fund the Special Tax Requirement for Services for such Fiscal Year where such shortfall resulted from delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes in such Fiscal Year that exceeded the Estimated Special Tax Delinquency Amount included in the Special Tax Requirement for Services for such Fiscal Year, less (vii) any funds available in the Reserve Fund or other funds associated with CFD No. 18M., "State" means the State of California. "TaxaWe Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. 18M of the CFD that are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or as defined below. "Und�eveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not cl�a�ssified as Developed Property. B, ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORIES OF SPECIAL,TAX Each Fiscal Year,, beginning with Fiscal Year 2017-18, using the definitions above, each Assessor's Parcel within CF'D No. 18M shall be classified by the CFD Administrator as Taxable Property or Exempt Property. In addition, each such Fiscal Year, each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property shall be further classified by the CFD Administrator as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property. Developed Property shall be further assigned to a Land Use Class as specified in Table 1. The Land Use Class of each Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property or Non-Residential Property shall be determined based on the records of the County Assessor or other such information provided by the City. Commencing with Fiscal Year 2017-18 and for each subsequent Fiscal Year, Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes pursuant to Section C below. In some instances/ an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class., The Maximum Special Tax levied on such Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land U�se Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE 1, Developed Property The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Parcel c,lassifi'ed as Developed Property shall be determined by refere,nce to Table 1 and the paragraphs that follow Table 1. 202*_(3WF P�Rq�919-7 6 8 TABLE 1 Maximum Special Tax Basi's for Developed Property Community Facilities District No. 18M (Fiscal Year 2016-17) Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Special Tax Special Tax Special Tax Basis Special Tax Basis Land U�se Class Basis for Basis for for Asset La bor Water Replacement Single Family $ 912.16 $341.42 255.�70 11509.28 Detached Property Single Family 729.73 $273.14 204.56 11207'.43 Attached Property Multi-Family 72.97 $27.31 20.,46 120.74 Property Non-Residential 31648.64 $1,365.68 11022.,82 61037�.13 Property The Maximum Special Tax Basis shall be equal to the sum of Maximum Special Tax Basis for Labor, Maximum Special Tax Basis for Water and Maximum Special Tax Basis for Asset Replacement as shown in Table I above. In determining the Maximum Special Tax Basis, the components of the Maximum Special Tax Basis,for each Land Use Description shall be increased in the 2017-18 Fiscal Year, and each Fiscal Yea�r thereafter, as follows: i. the annual percentage ch�a�nge of the Maximurn Special Tax Basis for Labor shall be equal to the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W); and i i. the annual percentage ch�a�nge of the Maximurn Special Tax Basis for Water shall be equal to the annual percentage change in the Otay Water District Commodity Rate; and iii. the annual percentage change of the Maximum Special Tax Basis for Asset Replacement shall be equal to the annual percentage change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for the Los Angeles Area. The Fiscal Year 2,016-17 Maximum Special Tax shall be equal to the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Maximum Special Tax Basis. In each subsequent Fiscal Year, the Maximum Special Tax shall be increased by an amount not less than two percent (2%) and not greater than six percent (6%) that results i'n a minimal absolute diffe,re,nc,e from the Maximum Special Tax Basis for that Fiscal Year. 202*_(3WF P 7 6 8 2. Ot�her Property Types No Special Tax shall be levied on Undeveloped Property or Exempt Property. D, METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 201,7-18, and for each subsequent Fiscal Year., the CFD1 Administrator shall levy the Special Tax on all Taxable Property of CF'D No. 18M until the total amount of Special Tax levied equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property within CFID No. 18M up to 1010% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement. Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor"s Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within the CFID by more than ten percent (10%) above what such Special Tax would have bee�n in the absence of delinquencies. E. PREPAYMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied in perpetuity for the purpose of financing ongoing authorized Services and therefore may not be prepaid. �F, EXEMPTIONS The City Council shall classify as Exempt Property: (i) Public Property, (ii) Property Owner Association Property, (iii) CPF Property, (iv) Assessor's Parcels with public or utility easements making impractical their utilization for other than the purposes set forth in the easement, including but not limited to �prope�rty designated for open space, trails, pathways, parks or park and recreation related facilities, and (v), property reasonably designated by the C,ity or CFD Administrator as Exempt Property due to deed restrictions, conservation easement, or similar factors. G. APPEALS Any landowner who pays the Special Tax and claims the amou�nt of the Special Tax levied on h�is or her Assessor's Parcel is in error shal�l first consult with the CFD Administrator regarding such error not later than thirty-six (36) months after first having paid the first installment of the Special Tax that is disputed. If following such consultation, the CFD1 Administrator determines that an error has occurred, then the CFID Administrator shal�l take any of the following actions, in order of priority, in order to correct the error: (i) Amend the Special Tax levy on the landowner's Assessor's Parcel(s) for the current Fiscal Year prior to the payment date, 202*_(3WF �4q�120�7 6 8 R (ii) Require the CIFID to reimburse the landowner for,the, amount of the overpayment to the extent of available CFD funds, or (iii) Grant a credit against, eliminate or reduce the future Special Taxes on the landowner's Assessor's Parc,el(s) in the amount of the overpayment., If following such consultation and action by the CFD Administrator the landowner believes such error still exists/ such person may file a written notice of appeal with the C,ity Council. Upon the receipt of such notice, the City Council or designee may establish such procedures as deemed necessary to undertake the review of any such appeal. If the City Council or designee determines an error still e�xists, the CFD Administrator shall take any of the actions described as (i), (ii) and (iii) above, in order of priority, in order to correct the error. The City Council or designee thereof shall interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment, of Special Tax for purposes of clarifying any ambiguities and make determination�s relative to the administration of the Special Tax and any landowner appeals. The decision of the City Council or designee shall be final. �H. MANN�ER OF COLLECTION Special Taxes levied pursuant to Section D above shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem� property taxes, provided that the CFD Administrator may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet the financial obligations of the CF'D or as otherwise determined appropriate by the CFD1 Administrator. 1, TERM OF SPECIAL,TAX Taxable Property in the CIFID shall remain subject to the Special Tax in perpetuity. 202*-(3WF P 7 6 8 Chula Vista CFD Report Community Facilities District No. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) October 2016 ............ ... ......... .......... OMEN= WOM ........... .............. ...........// qp E1111111111111111A B L E 0 F C 0 N E N"""""'rs TABLE OF CONTENTS .....................................................................2 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................ 1 11. GENERAL DESCRIPTION & BOUNDARIES OF CFD No., 2 Ill. FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA .... 3 IV. DESCRIPTION V. COST ESTI MATE 5 VI. RATE AN D M ETHOD OF, APPORTIONMENT OF S PECIAL 6 E,X H I B I T A (B,o U N DARY 91 EXHIBIT B (FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA) ............................................ 11 EXHIBIT C (PRELIMINARY �BUDGET).................................................... 13 EXHIBIT D (RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT).......................... 15 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 6,64 of 768 1 0 Introduction WHEREAS, the, City Council of the City of Chula Vista (hereinafter referred to as the "City Council"), in the State of California, d�id, pursuant to the terms and provisions of Chapter 2.5 of Part 1. of Division 2. of Title 5 of the Government Cod�e of the State of California, as amended (the "Act"), adopted a Resolution of Intention for the proposed formation of City of Chula Vista Community Facilities District No., 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) ("CFD No. 16-l"). WHEREAS, this Community Facilities District Report ("Report") is being provided to the City Council and generally contains the following: 1. A brief description of Community Facilities District No. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) of the City of Chula Vista ("CFD NO. 18M"); 2. A brief description of the public services (the "'Services") which a�re required to adequately to meet the needs of CFD No. 18M. 3. A brief description of the Boundaries of CFD1 18M-� and 1 4. An estimate of'the cost providing such Services, as defined below, includi'ng all costs associated with formation of the District', determination of the amount of any special taxes,, collection of any special taxes, or costs otherwi'se i'ncurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the City with respect to the District, and any other incidental expenses to be pa�id through the proposed financing. For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention, Resolution No. 2016-199 as previously approved. All capitalized terms not defined herein are defined in the, Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax section (Exhibit D) of this report. NOW THEREFORE Willclan Financial Services, the app,oi'nted responsible firm directed to prepare the Report, pursuant to the provisions of the Code, does hereby submit the following: 202*"",,2�3V FY fik�P/N PagpeV of 768 rvl§tl 0 G e�n e r a- D e s c.,ri'p tio n & B o u n d a rm ies of OF-D No., 18M The proposed boundaries of CFD 18M encompass parcels located within Otay Ranch in the City of Chula Vista, San Diego. Otay Ranch Village 3 i's approximately four hundred and twenty-three (423) acres located j'ust south and east of the Otay Landfill and Village Two, west of the existing light inclustrial uses in the City of Chula Vista and north of the Oltay River Valley. The project is proposed for approximately 702 single-family units and 563 multi-family units, 7.9 acres of office use., and 16.8 acres of industrial use. A description of the exterior boundar,ies of'the territory proposed for inclusion in CFD No. 18M,, including properties and parcels of land proposed to be subject to the levy of a Special Tax by CFD No. 18M1, is shown on the boundary map designated as "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 18M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3)11. which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, an�d which was recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego on October 11, 2016 in Book 46 of Maps of' Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 5, as Instrument Number 2016-700,0436. A copy of the map i's attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby incorporated by reference. The Boundary Map also depicts an area designated as the Future Excluded Area which is intencled to be excluded from CFD 18M upon recordation of final parcel maps for the area. This area is curre,ntly included with�in the boundaries of CFD 18M because the Future Excluded Area does not curre,ntly exist as a separate legal parcel, but is a part of the legal parcel identified on the Boundary Map as Assessor's Parcel No. 644-060-27-00. Wh�en this a�rea becomes,a separate legal parcel, action will be taken to remove it from the CFD. 202*"",,2�3V FY POAR 6�768 fik�P/N Page rvl§tl I............uture Annexation Area On October 4. 2016 the Resolution of Intention of the C,ity Council of the City of Chula Vista to allow for future annexation of territory to City of Chula Vista Community Facilities D�istrict No. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) was adopted. Resolution No. 2016-1919 gave the City the ability and option to annex future development projects into CFD No. 18M,, and to do so in an expedited manner. The Future Annexation Area was established so that property adjacent to CFD 18M, that may be developed at some point in the future, and which may include maintenance and service requirements substantially similar to those in the existing CFD 18M, could be annexed to CFD 18M., This would occur if'it is determined that the existing tax rate structure for CFD 18M can be fairly and equitably applied to this area, and that it will generate suff'icient revenue to fund the required maintenance and servi'ces for this area. A description of the exterior boundaries of the future annexation area is as shown on the boundary map designated as "FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 18M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3)111. which is on file in the off'ice of the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, and was recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego on October 11, 2016 in Book 46 of Maps of Assessment a�nd Community Facilities Districts at page 6, as Instrument �Number 2016-7000437. A copy of the map is attached hereto as Exhibit B and he,reby incorporated by reference. Future developments may be annexed into CFD No. 18M upon the petition by, and the approval of, the owner o�r owners of any such parcel(s) at the time annexation is requested. A public hearing is required to count the votes and annex the parcel(s) into the pre-establish�ed district. 202*"",,2�3V FY P049 A 768 fik�P/N Page rvl§tl Iv.1 Descro'ilp"Han of Services, '0 The district will fund the maintenance and replacement of (a) landscaping, including, but not limited to, trees, slopes, parkways and medians; (b) facilities that are, directly related to storm water quality control; (c) walls and fencing; and (d) trails. 202*""',2�3V FY fik�P/N PagpeoAq 5 768 rvl§tl V. Cos"t Estimates, The estimated annual budget for CFD 18M is approximately$1,591,,750 which is shown in Exhibit C. This includes $1,284,555 for: landscape �maintenance�, includ�ing irrigation; inspection, operation and maintenance of storm water quality facilities; maintenance of walls, fencing, and trails, including gr�affiti abatement; and $269,676 that is set aside for the replacement of the amenities and facilities as they reach the end of the,ir useful life. In addition, the budget includes $37,519.60 for, CFD administration (preparing reports, levyi'ng and collecting taxes, public assistance�, etc.) by City Staff, or their designee. 202*""',2�3V FY fik�P/N PagpeOAR A 768 rvl§tl VL Rate and Met["iod of Apportionment of Special ""Fax A. Overview All property located within CF'D No. 18M, unless exempted by law or specifically by the Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D and hereby incorporated by reference, shall be taxed for the purpose of providi'ng necessary services to property within CFD1 No. 18M. Pursuant to Section 53325.3 of the Act,,the tax imposed is a special tax and not a special assessment.Therefore,there is no requirement that the tax be apportioned on the basis of special benefit to any property. The special tax "may be based on a benefit received by parcels of real property, the cost of making facilities or authorized services avai'lable to each parcel,or some other reasonable basis as determined by the legislative body".The special tax may not be apportioned on an ad valorem basis pursuant to Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. B. General Exp�anatlon of Special I ax Appurtiiunment When a commu�nity facilities district is formed, a special tax may be levied on each parcel of taxable, property within the C,FD to pay for authorized services or to repay bonded indebtedness or other related expenses incurred by the C,FD. When more than one type of land use is present within a community facilities district, various criteria may be con�sid�ered when a�pportioning a specia�l tax., Generally, criteria based on bu�ild�ing square footage,, lot size, density, service population, and/or land use are selected to establish categories to differentiate between parcel�s of property.These categories are a direct result of the la nclowner/d eve l�oper's projected product mix, and are reflective of the proposed land use types within that community facilities district. The major assumption inherent in the Special Tax rates set forth in the RMA is that the level of benefit received from the proposed public services is a function of land use and/or size of building. C. StrUcture of the Rate and Method of Apportionment The RMA for CFD No�. 18M is made up of a definitions sect,ion, a description of the tax rates, and the outline of the procedural steps required for calculati'ng and apportioning the special tax. In general,the first step is to classify each parcel as e,ither Taxable or Exempt. The second step is to then cletermine the applicable tax rate to be applied to each parcel determined to be Taxable, based on its development status and land use type�. The third step is to apply the applicable Special Tax rates to developed properties until the Special Tax Requirement is satisfied. The following diagram illustrates the general process of determining the applicable rate to be a�pplied to each parcel within CFD No., 18M:1 202*"",,2�3V FY fik�P/N PagpeV fi 768 rvl§tl Ab a Ab Ak Ab Ab Ab Ab Ab A A a a A Ab amb da m Ab db Ab Amb D. Makimum Special Tax Rates The Maximum Special Tax Rates that may be levied on any parcel within the boundaries of CFD 18M. beginning with the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 are shown be�low: Developed Sped"all-ax Rates The following rates are shown as a per unit basis, and are subject to an annual escalation as described in the RMA. Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Special Tax Special Tax Special Tax Basis Special Tax Basi's Land Use Class Basi's for Basis for for Asset La�bor Wa�ter Replacement Single Family $ 912.16 $341.42 255.70 115019.28 Detached Property Single Family 7291.73 $273.14 204.56 112017.43 Attached Property Multi-Family 72.97 $27.31 20.46 1201.74 Property Non-Resi'dential 31648.64 $1,365.68 11022.82 61037.13 Property Undeveloped Specilal 1 ax Rates No tax will be levied on undeveloped property. The Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA) for CFD 18M provides sufficient information to allow a property owner within CFD 18M to estimate the, Maximum Special Tax for his or her property. It also includes method of prepayment in full or prepayment in part and the procedure for prepayments. For particulars on the rate and method of apportionment, reference is made to Exhibit D of this report. 202*"",,2�3V FY P049 A 768 Page EXHIRIT A Boundary Map 202*"",,2�3V FY PagpeoW A 768 MC 1 Rl"re,"1M,p -------------------- E7 I q F1 PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NOT, 18M ('0TAY RANCHNIL", i,GE,3) OF CHULAVISTA COUNTY OF'SAN D1E,(30,,,,,STATE OF CALAFORNIAT 21 VIA flut�1�rwrpibt to,*m tAllp,0traim,kyo,111'rt: w p FT n7T �S*11'11J p r7l K)a vV0,Jilt F&II)IT1*0 a h"I",ptyl 1U)" illilkift 1,1141 1 1"J"kh"'Ir I FAI 1p Rik; 4,9,li� % 1v R V k u7 r mw j 7.$'kr OX'k,"I If P t, 0A C1 0, X��,rate lill" imrl�mu L7A t"t 'a k ............... ........... N11,111 r�w,� K'a JJJA o" 6 J.P. ,)P PrAb 116#101 Cmvo(W............................................................................... A3. Ab F47 lttkb,aFFIR to,41ft ve mo,,� R' `�0'00N^ V U R."I.,;�;ALW lu % 1r; R 1, rw, w(A342'*Ah Ell Dfill LhN t,OF 1,0444 LOT(Whwl WIMIK K �o` &iaw I 0�*,ro NA" 04,1uh,g-r T��F i"Mul,�1� *RU","Al�N&A,�O f 1'��R 1w, L'177,7;1"49!:!�,hI'j;,, 0 PA n TAS;SfkA rm"Ar R.mIAP 17"Allw i F,i ,Pr!�1;,fr�PP;ta,11V 0:0, 1, 614,Or"A.i it,rwr;i rfA rw,;�,'A i,i m z ntiw;li r ..'hPi'I es(k 'i K�i il� 111114'r., 4ffii#,)E,4AVj 0 X, �4 11�7'ii re, X;p J`_ de 'IT �jl ......... .,96 ..................Mfflwm�,14 6"M....................,mwlf� 6, Legend MA P"RE.,Ff FU N Cf A55 R".5,PA RCE L DISTR K3.7 13,01J N r,,,)A RY N(i)Via EIR N 140,10B,F R F1Jj FU RE,�E XCILIJ D E 0 AR EA PAA P E 14 E,Mi E N U rd EMI,R 21, 6,44-1 WG ��3 64-4,DW-27-M Fmardal Sivvicurs, U........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 LLDAN Page 10 nicial Services 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 6,74 of 768 EXHIBI F' B Future Annexation Area Pa 202*"",,2�3V FY PageV51olf 768 I C"'ON ITY MAP RIM wil" FUTURE AN NEXA TION], AREA, COMMUNIT "FACI LITIES,DISTR.'i[C-T NO. 11 8M IN (0(,TAY R,'ANCH VILLA.GE,3), CITY"OF CHULAVISTA, �C.0, AN DJE0Y,0, S"WE .......................................... �0@4 T E, 1"11,1P I'li M4it";'4"'A'143:ml't R"WE'J"4ffma kUll"Am" RA' ",M)0 1 if' L ''Aft 4ftm L�rkw"'D'04u� ....................................... ME,P"kO I 1,411F, T 0Y'0�I Cmt!"All.",Ill'I I IN k"J ll(L,04Cif,!�N C01 I U4, t')rArl"Y mm)40w. �Mw m'!"inp vo�"�l ipJ b"'k ffl�mftj-0416 W'1�110M 6 1`0 1,I)m4r.I r, 111C loKh".I.Yr 7 ut '"I fr 60 0�' �kp'�k 9�Al'�)Al�111111111C i# ..................................................................................................................................................................... '16 lf"41 V*101"i 4'�"'064[f kk 1, 'e'd FlaM, "t �"A'lllmllliAo�160 ......................... A/M. rof��' j NF"Rjj*j, 01 tDo%'�momp P"'N wj@q W9, IF Ir "C'I C b, I l�! lqlllt'j�Qm' iqlAl Y�I(n 11,0,1(im(D)l k All Ij X,,;r e"?dpd dl ep 111J� .1"oll ill �Wllll CYIV�N'T"o"11SAW ll'.'Jfi�Mol,Pop'5*1016 G"11H & "d P J �.q' go idPl ld�h�pw W P p1l",p" d" w P w r re A" j?" "do l r'ke, kl )JI ol�A, Jil off A ............................................................................................................................................................. Legoind M N P RRE F EIRIE,N C E ASSES'SGR,�"S 0,1 Ufltm-k',N h illt X A t 1 14 A,A t A �N 1111)WERR P�A R L�N 11111),11M) ,lml'31 R W` WILLDAN 2 0 2 [YA(Tk$tj PF�Rqg6j(k 768 Services EXHIBIT C Preliminary CFD Budget 202*6)WpA,q Ntj PD& P71A-768 OTAY LAND-VILLAGE 3 CITY OF CHULA VISTA DERIVATION OF ESUMATED MAINTENANCE SPECIAL TAX BASED ON EDU'S FOR ENTIRE VILLAGE Sep tmmber 22,2016 7------ ................ LAND USE INFORMATION Maintenance Special Tax Analysis Total Total Total Total Annual Amual Esthnated Residential Ann-ual Annital Annual e cial Tax SpecialTax Total Net Product Unit Square EDU Total SpecialTax Sp cc ial Tax *ecialTax (Repakement per Unit Product Type units Acres Type Sim Feet Factor EDUs (Total) (:LaLbor) (water) Costs) orAcre Residential A AUe yRo w TH wf Pa do 107 TH 1,450 155,150 0.80 M $ 129,195 $ 78,M1 $ 29,226 $ 21,888 $ 1,207 B TrIple x �2 TH 1,550 111,600 0.80 2 86,935 52,540 19,666 14,729 1,207 C �&torc ourt 6 pac III TH 1,950 216,450 0.80 89 134,024 81,000 30,318 22,707 1,207 D 34 x 79 Aliey 122 SFD 1,950 237,900 1.00 122 184,133 111,2S3 41,653 31,196 1,509 E 44x 62 162 SFD 2,050 332,100 1.00 162 244,504 147,�M 55,310 41,424 1,509 F 48 x 65 130 SFD 2,400 312,000 1.00 130 196,207 118,581 44,385 33,242 1,509 G 48 x 75 135 SFD 2,650 357,750 1.00 135 203,753 123,141 46,092 34,520 1,509 H 50 x 90 77 SFD 2,950 22�,150 1.00 116,215 70,236 26,289 19,689 1,509 1 55 x 90(3 car tan&m) 76 SFD 3,150 239,400 1.00 76 114,706 69,324 25,948 19,434 1,509 MU re si&ntial f Apts. 2�3 Apt. 933 254,709 0.08 22 32,963 19,922 7,457 5,585 121 0 ffx e 7.90 office 4.00 32 47,693 28,824 10,789 8,080 6,037 Irdustnal 16.8 IrLdustial 4.00 67 101,424 61,297 22,943 17,183 Total 1,265 24.7 2,444�209 1,055 $ 1,591,750.18 $ 961,999.56 $ 360,074�93 $ 269,675.68 Total Maintenance Budget(as of Augwt I st 2016 B milge t) $ L591J50.10 $ 961M9.56 $ 36%074�93 $ 269fi75.68 Total EDUs IM54.64 L054.64 L054A4 L054.64 Cost Per EDU $ L509.20 $ 912.16 $ 341.42 $ 255.70 EDU Factor(1.0) $ 912.16 $ 341.42 $ 255.70 EDU Factor(.80) $ 729.73 $ 273.14 $ 204.56 EDU Factor(08) $ 72.97 $ 27.31 $ 20.46 EDU Factor(4.0) $ 3p648.64 $ IP365.60 $ IF022.02 V2 hk,K4& ack(alt, Papeq$q*68 e I ar EXHIBIT D Rate and Method of Apportionment 202*6)WPA,l Ntl PD& V91(�768 Ralte and Method of Apport'i'loininrient of Spec'ilczifl "rax Cilty olf Clliula Vista a a ij� a c ii I ii t i le s U�st�rict �I'qo. I 8M (0tay Raiii&I�ii Vilflage 3) A Special Tax as hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) of the City of Chula Vista and collected each Fiscal Year commenci'ng with Fiscal Year 2017-18 in an amount, determined by the CFD Administrator through the appli'cati'on of the procedures described below. All of the real property within CFD No. 18,M, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: "'Acre"or"'Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map�, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's, Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Subdivision Map, other final map, other parcel map, other condominium plan�, or functionally equivalent map or instrument recorded in the Office of the Cou�nty Recorder. The square footage of an Assessor"s Parcel is equal to the Acreage multiplied by 4315�60. "'Act" means the M�ell�o,-Ro,os Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 11 Division 2 of Title 5 of the Governm�ent Code of the State of California. "'Administrative Expenses" mea�ns the actual or estimated costs incurred by the City, acting for and on behalf of the CFD as the administrator thereof, to, determine, levy and collect the Special Taxes, includ�ing salaries of City employees and a proportionate amou�nt of the City's general adm�inistrative overhead rel�a�ted thereto, and the fees of consultants and legal counsel providing services related to the administration of the CFD; the costs of collecting installments of the Special Taxes; and any other costs required to administer the CFD as determined by the City. "Assessor's Parcel" or "Parcel" means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned asse�ssor�'s parcel number. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by assessor's parce�l number. 202*6)WPATI Ntj PD& W019-768 "CFD Administrator" means an offi'cial of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. "CI'D No. 1,8M" or "CFD" means Community Facilities District No. 18M (Otay Ranch Village 3) of the City of Chula Vista. "City" means the City of Chula Vista. "Community Purpose Facility Property" or "C,PF Property" means all Assessor's Parcels which are classified as community purpose facilities and meet the requirements of City Ordinance No. 2883. "'Construction Cost Index" mea�ns, for any Fiscal Year, the applicable Construction Cost Index for the City of Los Angeles as set forth in the Engineering News Record for July of such Fisca�l Year. In the event that this rate is no longer published or provided, the CFD Administrator shall choose a comparable rate to use in its, place. ""Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers" or "'CPI-W" means the ap�plicable,CP1-W as set forth by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for July of such Fiscal Year. In the event that this rate is no longer published or provided, the CFD Administrator,shall choose a comparab,le rate to use in its place. "Council" means the City Council of the City, acting as th�e �l�egislative body of the CFD. "County" means the County of San Diego, California. "Developed Property" means all Taxable Property for which a building permit was issued prior to the March 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax i's being levied. "Dwelling Unit" or "DU" means each separate residential dwelling unit that comprises an independent facility capable of conveyance or rental separate from adjacent residential dwelling u n its. "Exempt Property" means all Assessor's Parcels within CFD No. 18M that are exempt from the Special Taxes pursuant to law or Section F herein. "Final Subdivision Map" means a subdivision of property creating residential or non-residenti'al buildable lots by recordation of a final subdivision map or parcel map pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.), or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352.,that creates individual lots for which building permits may be issued without further subdivision and is recorded prior to March 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting July 1 and en�ding on the fol�lowing June 30. ""Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1. 202*6)WPATI Ntj PD& W117f 768 "Maximum Special Tax Basis" means the amount determined in accordance with Section C below that represents the actual costs associated with providing the Services funded by CFD No. 18 M. "Maximum Special Tax" means the maximum Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C below that may be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property. "Multi-Family Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Residential Property consisting of two or more for�-rent Dwelling Units that share common walls, includ�ing, but not limited to, apartments and townhomes that are not for sale to an end user and are under common management. "Non-Residential Property" means all Assessor"s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit(s) has been issued for a structure or structure's for non-residential use. "Ot�lay Water District Commodity Rate"' means the maximum rate charged by the Otay Water District for recycled water on Ju�ly 1st of any Fiscal Year. In the event that th�is rate is no longer published or provided, the CFD Administrator sh�al�l choose a comparable rate to use in its p�lace. ""Property Owner Association Property" means a�ny property with�in the bounclaries, of the CFD that is,owned by,or irrevocably dedicated as indicated in a�n instrument recorded with the County Recorder to, a property owner association, including any master or sub,-associati'on. "Public Property" means any property within the boundaries of the CFD that is, at the t,i'me of' the, CFD formation, expected to be used for any public purpose and is owned by or dedicated to the,federal government,, the State, the County, the City or any other publi'c agency. "Reserve Fund" means a fund that shall be maintained for the CFD each Fiscal Year to provide necessary cash flow for the first six months of each Fiscal Year, working capital to cover monitoring, maintenance and repair cost overruns and delinquencies i'n the payment of Special Taxes and a reasonable buffer to prevent large variations in annual Special Tax levies., "Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit(s) has been i'ssued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling unit(s). "Services" means those,authorized services that may be funded by CFD, No. 18M pursuant to the Act, as amended, i'ncluding, without limitation, those services authorized to be funded by C,FD No. 18M as set forth in the documents adopted by the City Council at the time CFD No. 18M was formed. "'Single Family Attached Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of for-sale Residential Property consisting of one or more Dwelling Unit(s) that share common walls with one or more other Dwelling U�nit(s), in�cluding, but not limited to, duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, and condominiums. ""Single Family Detached Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Residential Property consisting of a single Dwelling Unit. "Special Tax" means the Special Tax levied pursuant to the provisions of sections C and D below in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property and Undeveloped Property in CFD No. 181V11 to fund the Special Tax Requirement. ""Special Tax Requirement" means the amount,. as determined by the CFD Administrator,.for any Fiscal Year to: (i) pay the costs of providing the Services during such Fiscal Year,, (ii) pay 202*6)WPATI Ntj PD& W2104 768 Administrative Expenses associated with the Special Tax, (iii) establish or replenish the Reserve Fund, (iv) pay incidental expe�nse�s related to the Services as authorized pursuant to the, Act, (v) fund an amount equal to a reasonable estimate of delinquencies expected to occur in the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax will be levied ("Estimated Special Tax Delinquency Amount") and (vi), fund the shortfall, if any, in the Special Tax revenues collected in the preceding Fiscal Year necessary to fund the Special Tax Requirement for Services for such Fiscal Year where such shortfall resulted from delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes in such Fiscal Year that exceeded the Estimated Special Tax Delinquency Amount included in the, Special Tax Requirement for Services for such Fiscal Year, less (vii) any funds available, in the Reserve Fund or other funds associated with CFD No. 18M. "State" means the State of California. "'Taxable Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels with�in the boundaries of CFD No. 18M of the CFD that are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or as defined below. "'Undeveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not class,ified as Developed Property. B. ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORIES OF SPECIAL TAX Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 2017-18, using the definitions above, each Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 18M shall be classified by the CFD Administrator as Taxable Property or Exempt Property. In addition, each such Fiscal Year, each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property shall be further classified by the CFD Administrator as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property. Developed Property shall be further assigned to a Land Use Class as specified in Table 1. The Land Use Class of each Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property or Non-Residentia�l Property shall be determined based on the records of the County Assessor or other such information provided by the City. Commencing with Fiscal Year 2017-18 a�nd for each subsequent Fiscal Year, Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes pursuant to Section C, below., In some instances, an Assessor"s Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on such Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes, located on that Assessor's Parcel. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE 1, Developed Property The Maximum Special Tax for any Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be determined by reference to Table I and the paragraphs that follow Table 1. 202*6)WPATI NtJ PD& W31A 768 TABLE I IF r's Maximum Special Tax Basis for Developed Property Community Facilities District No. 18M (Fiscal Year 2016-17) Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Special Tax Special Tax Special Tax Basis Special Tax Basis Land Use Class Basis for Basis for for Asset Labor Water Replacement Single Family $ 912.16 $341.42 255.70 11509.28 Detached Property Single Family 7291.73 $273.14 204.56 112017.43 Attached Property Multi-Family 72.97 $27.31 20.46 1201.74 Property Non-Residential 31648.64 $113,65.68 11022.82 61037.13 Property The Maximum Special Tax Basis sh�a�ll be equal to the sum of Maximurn Special Tax Basis for Labor, Maximum Special Tax Ba�sis for Water and Maximurn Specia�l Tax Basis for Asset Replacement as shown in Table 1 above. In determining the Maximum Special Tax Basis, the com�ponen�ts of the Maximum Special Tax Basis for each Lan�d Use Description shall be increased in the 2017-18 Fiscal Yea�r,, a�nd each Fiscal Year thereafter, as follows: i. the annual percentage change of the Maximum Special Tax Basis for Labor shall be, equal to the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W); and i i. the, annual percentage change of the Maximum Special Tax Basis for Water shall be, equal to the annual percentage change in the Otay Water District Commodity Rate; and iii. the, annual percentage change of the, Maximum Special Tax Basis for Asset Replacement shall be equal to the annual percentage change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for the Los Angeles Area. The Fiscal Year 2016-17 Maximum Special Tax shall be equal to the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Maximum Special Tax Basis. In each subsequent Fiscal Year, the Maximum Special Tax shall be increased by an amount not less than two percent (2%) and not greater than six p�erce�nt (6%), that results in a minimal absolute difference from the Maximum Special Tax Basis for that Fiscal Year�. 202*6)WPATI Ntj PD& WA 768 2. Other Property Types No Special Tax shall be levied on Undeveloped Property or Exempt Property. D�. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF TH�E SPECIAL,TAX Commencing with Fi'scal Year 2017-18, and for each subsequent Fiscal Year, the CFD Administrator shall levy the Special Tax on all Taxable Property of CFD No. 18M until the total amount of Special Tax levied equals the Special Tax Requirement., The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property within CF'D No. 18M up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement. Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the, Special Tax levied against any Assessor's, Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has, been issued be increased as, a consequence of delinquency or de,fa�ult by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel with�in the CFD by more than ten percent (10%) above what such Special Tax would have been in the absen�ce of delinquencies. E. PREPAYMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied in perpetuity for the purpose of financing ongoing authorized Services and therefore may not be prepaid. F., EXEMPTIONS The City Council shall classify as Exem�pt Property: (i) Public Property, (ii) Property Owner Association Property, (iii) CPF Property, (iv) Assessor's Parcels with public or utility easements making impractical their utilization for other than the purposes set forth in the easement, including, but not lim�ited to property designated for open space, trails, pathways, parks or park and recreation related facil�ities, and (v) property reaso�na�bly designated by the City or CFD Administrator as Exempt Property due to deed restrictions, conservation easemen�t, or similar factors. G. APPEALS Any landowner who pays the Special Tax and claims the amount of' the Special Tax levied on his or her Assessor's Parcel is in error shall first consult with the CFD Administrator regarding such error not later than thirty-six (36) months after first having paid the first installment of the Special Tax that is disputed. If foll�owi'n�g such consultation, the C,FD Administrator determ�ines that an error h�as occurred, then the CFD Administrator shall take any of the following actions, in order of priority, in order to correct the error: (i) Amend the Special Tax levy on the landowner's Assessor's Parcel(s) for the current Fi'scal Year prior to the payment date, 202*6)WPATI Ntj PD& W54 768 (ii') Require the CFD to reimburse the landowner for the amount of the overpayment to the extent of available CFD funds, or (iii) Grant a credit against, eliminate or reduce the future Special Taxes on the landowner's Assessor's Parcel(s) in the amount of the ove�rpayme�nt. If following such consultation and action by the CFD Administrator the landowner be,lieves such error still exists, such person may file a written notice of appeal with the, City Council. Upon the receipt of such notice, the City Council or designee may establish such procedures as deemed necessary to undertake the review of any such appeal. If the City Councilor designee determines an error still exists, the CFD Administrator shall take any of the actions described as (i), (ii) and (iii) ab�ove�, in order of priority, in order to correct the error. The City Council or designee thereof shall interpret this Rate and �Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for purposes of clarifying any ambiguities and make, determinations relative to the adm�inistration of the Special Tax and any landowner appea�ls. The decision of the City Council or clesignee shall be fin�a�l. H. MANNER OF COLLECTION Special Taxes levied pursuant to Section D above shall be collected in the, same manner and at the, same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, provided that the CFD Administrator may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet the financial obligations of the CIFID or as otherwise, determined appropriate by the CFD Administrator. 1. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX Taxable Property in the CFD shall remain subject to the Special Tax in perpetuity. 202*6)WPA,qNtJ PD& 9&4768 IN III til C1TY' C,0UNC'1L A,GEN' DA S,TIA, "nEMENT CITY, OF ..................................... CHUIAVISTA June 23,202�O File ID: 20-0254 'TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR,AND RECEIPT OF, LOCAL,EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On January 27, 2020, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issued a Notice of Funding Availability(NOFA)i for approximately$119 million under,the Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Grant Program. Funding can be used for the acceleration of housing production and to facilitate compliance in implementing the sixth-cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). This action requests authorization to apply for the funds through this NOFA, as amended,to increase available funding to facilitate the completion of the sixth cycle RHNA analysis and preparation, adopition,and implementation of the City I s sixth-cycle Housing Element(HE). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project 1P as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the action consists of an application that provides assistance to local governments to accelerate housing production or to facilitate compliance to implement the sixth-cycle RHNA and HE;therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines,the activity is not subject to CEQA.Thus,no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE,RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION In the 20,19-2020 Budget Act, Governor Newsom allocated $250 million for all regions, cities, and counties to do their part by prioritizing planning activities that accelerate housing production to meet the identified needs o�f'every community. With this allocation, HCD established the Local Early Action Planning (LEAP Grant Program with$119 million availab�le for cities and counties and issued a Notice of Funding Availability on January 27, 2020. LEAP provides a one-time competitive grant to cities and counties, to update their planning documents and implement process improvements that will facilitate the acceleration of housing 1111. 0 0 1 PIi3ge 1 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,8,7 of 768 production and help local governments prepare for their sixth-cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Funding awards are competitive and scaled based on population. The City is eligible for a maximum of$5�00,000. The application deadline to submit for the LEAP grant is July 1,2020. LEAP,Application The LEAP Grant Program requires a resolution passed bv the City Council in order for staff to apply for the grant funds. The funds could be used for the preparation of the forthcoming required updates to the City's Housing Element(HE) during the next RHNA cycle (2021-2029) and process improvements that accelerate housing production and facilitate compliance to implement the sixth cycle of the regional housing needs assessment. City staff has developed a project timeline,and has already begun the data gathering and analysis and public participation that is necessary to prepare a comprehensive update of their Housing Element, in advance of the due date ofApril. 15, 2021. The LEAP application will provide funding that is needed to pay for staff working on the preparation of the HE,any experts needed to assist,and any further work on process improvements,policies and/o�r programs that facilitate housing and implement RHNA. Conclusion State Law requires every city and county in California to adopt a Housing Element(HE)as part of the General Plan. The law provides for periodic updates of the HE,with the next required update being"round 6" of the HE. This 6th cycle covers the timefr�ame of 2021-2029, with the updated HE due to HCD by April 15, 20�21. This one-,time funding, if successful,will pay for the costs to prepare and adopt the required HE updates to be in compliance with State law and policies and programs to facilitate housing production. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT" Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the real property holdings of the City Council members do not create a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal.Govt Code§8�7 100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware,and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURREN"I'-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact in the current fiscal year. If awarded the grant from the California Department of Housing and Community Development LEAP p�rogram,staff will return to Council to accept and appropriate these funds. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing fiscal impact. If the grant is successful,LEAP funds may provide program administration costs of up to 5,%,. In addition, the application includes City staff and consultant costs that are needed to prepare and adopt the sixth cycle Housing Element. ATTACHMENT 1. HCD Grant Notice and Application Guidelines Staff Contact.-Jose Dorado,Senior Man agemen t Analyst-DSD-Housing Division P �3ge 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,8,8 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. 2020- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR, AND RECEIPT OF, LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS WHEREAS,, pursuant to the Health and Safety Code 50515 et. S,eq, the Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is authorized to issue a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) as part of the Local Planning Support Grants Program (hereinafter referred to by the Department as the Local Early Action Planning Grants program or LEAP); and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista City Council desires to submit a LEAP grant application package ("Application"), on the forms provided by the Department, for approval of grant funding for projects that assist in the preparation and adoption of planning documents and process improvements that accelerate housing production and facilitate compliance to implement the sixth cycle of the regional housing needs assessment; and WHEREAS,, the Department has issued a NOFA and Application on January 27,, 2020 in the amount of$119,040,000 for assistance to all California jurisdictions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista ("Ap�p�l i cant") that it hereby approves as follows,: SECTION 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to apply for and submit to the Department the Application package; SECTION 2: In connection with the LEAP grant, if the Application is approved by the Department, the City Manager of the City of Chula Vista is authorized to submit the Application, enter into, execute, and deliver on behalf of the Applicant, a State of California Agreement (Standard Agreement) in an amount not to exceed $500,000, and any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence and secure the LEAP grant, the Applicant's obli ations, related thereto and all amendments thereto; and 9 1 1 SECTION 3. The Applicant shall be subject to the terms and conditions as specified in the NOFA, and the Standard Agreement provided by the Department after approval. The Application and any accompanying documents are incorporated in full as part of the Standard Agreement. Any and all activities funded, information provided, and timelines represented in the Application will be enforceable through the fully executed Standard Agreement. Pursuant to the NOFA and in conjunction with the terms of the Standard Agreement, the Applicant hereby agrees to use the funds for eligible uses and allowable expenditures in the manner presented and specifically identified in the approved Application. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,8,9 of 768 Presented by Approved as to form by Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,90 of 768 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY Gavin Newsorn, Govemor DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �D�IVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 2020 W.El Camino Avenue,Suite 500 Sacramento,CA 95833 (9 16)263-2771 /FAX(916)263-2763 www.hcd�.ca.gov January 27, 2020 MEMORANDUM FOR: All Potential A�ppl�icants FROM: Zachary Olmstead, Deputy Director Division of Housing Policy Development SUBJECT: NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY - LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRANTS PROGRAM The California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is pleased to announce the release of this, Notice of Funding Availability (NOF'A) for approxim�ately $119,040,000 as part of the Local Early Action Planning Grants Program (LEAP or Program). LEAP is made available as a portion of the Local Government Planning Support Grants Program pursuant to Chapter 3.1 of Health and Safety Code (Sections 5,0515 to 505,15.05) (Chapter 15�9, Statutes of 2019). LEAP provides funding to jurisdictions for the preparation and adoption of planning docu�ments,, process improvements that accelerate housing production, and facilitate compliance in implementing the sixth cycle of the reg I ion�al housing need assessment (RHN�A). In order to be eligible for g�rant funding, an applicant must submit a completed, signed original application and an electronic copy on CD or US13 flash drive,. Applications will be accepted on an Over-the-Counter (OTC) basis as of the date of this �NOFA through July 1, 2020. The Department encourages early applications and will accept applications post-marked by the July 1, 2020, deadline. Applicants may utilize various carrier services, such as the U.S. Postal Service, UPS, �FedEx, or other carrier services. All applications must be submitted to the Department at the following address: California Department of Housing and Community Development Division of Housing Policy Development 20,20 West El Camino Ave, Suite 5010, Sacramento, CA 95833 Program applications, forms and instructions are available on the Department's website at.h�ftps,://www.,hcd.,ca-gov/grants,-fun�din�g/active-�fundin�q�/l�eap.shtmI. If you have questio�ns regarding this NOFA, please email the Department at EarlyAc�tionP�l�an�n�ing@,hcd.,ca- Attachment 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,91 of 768 LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRAN�TS PROGRAM (LEAP) 2020 NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY .............. State of California Governor Gavin Newsom Alexis Podesta, Secretary Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency Douglas R. McCauley, Acting Director E1 California Department of Housing and Community Development Zachary Olmstead, Deputy Director California Department of Housing and Community Development Division of Housing Policy Development 20,20 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 500 Sacramento,,, CA 915833 Telephone: (916) 263-2911 Website: h�ttps://www.hcd ca.gov/c ts�-fundin�q�/ac�tive-fu�n�di�ng/leap.sh�tmi� -iran Email: Ea�rlyAct�*ionPl�anninq(@,hcd,.ca-g�ov January 27, 2020, 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 6,92 of 768 'Table of Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................. 1 11. Authority and Scope................................................................................................1 111. Program Summary .................................................................................................2 IV. Program Timeline,...................................................................................................2 V. Award Amounts......................................................................................................3 VI. Eligible Applicants ..................................................................................................3 V 11. Eligible Activities..........................................................................................................4 V I I I., Ineligible Activities....................................................................................................6 IX. Eligible Uses......................................................................................................................7 X. Ineligible Uses.................................................................................................................7 XI. Application Requirements.......................................................................................7' XI 1. Application Submission Requirements...................................................................8 XI11. Application Review.................................................................................................8 XIV. Award Letter and Standard Agreement..................................................................9 XV. Appeals ..................................................................................................................9 XVI. Administration................................................................................................. XVI 1. Right to Modify or Suspend the NOFA, and Final Decision-making .....................13 XVII I. Definitions..........................................................................................................................14 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 6,93 of 768 2019 NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRANTS PROGRAM 1. Introduction The California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) ,is pleased to announce the release of this Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for approximately $119,040,000 as part of the, Local Early Action Planning Grants Program (LEAP or Program). LEAP is made available as, a portion of the Local Government Planning Support Grants Program pu�rsuant to, Chapter 3.1 of Health and Safety Code (Sections 50515.03 (Chapter 159, Statutes, of 2019). The Program provides funding to jurisdictions for the preparation and adoption of planning documents, process improvements that accelerate housing production, and facilitate compliance, in implementing the sixth cycle of the RHNA. 1111. Authority and Scope This �NOFA is authori,zed pursuant to Chapter 3.1 of Health and Safety Code (Sections 5051�5 to 50515-05). The NOFA implements, interprets, and makes specific provisions for purposes of implementing planning grants, to jurisdictions pursuant to 5015,15.03 (hereinafter "LEAP"). This NOFA establishes terms, conditions, forms, procedures and other mechanisms as the Department deems necessary to exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred by Chapter 3.1. The matters set forth herein are regulatory mandates, and are adopted in accordance with the authorities set forth below: Quasi-legislative regulations ... �have the dignity of statutes ... [and].,.. delegation of leg�islative authority includes the power to, elaborate the meaning of key statutory terms... Ramirez v. Yosemite Water Co., 20 Cal. 4th 785, 800 (1999) 0 Further, the Department may i I mplement the Program through the issuance of forms, guidelines, and one or more NOFAs, as the Department deems necessary, to exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred on it by this chapter. Any forms, guidelines, and notices of funding availability adopted pursuant to this section are �hereby exempted from the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code�). (Health and Safety Code Section 50515.04(f)). The Department reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to suspend or amend the provisions of this N10FA, including,, but not limited to, g�rant award amounts. CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 1 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 6,94 of 768 111111. Program Summary The Local Early Action Planning Grants Program (LEAP or Program) is part of the broader Program formerly known as the Local Government Planning Support Grants Program, which was established as part of the 2019-20 Budget Act. The 20,19-20, Budget Act provides a spectrum of support, incentives, resources, and accountability to meet California's housing goals. Some specific elements include: 0 Planning Support (local and regional planning grants) 0 Incentives (Prohousing preference and inf'ill incentive grants) 0 Fun�din�g Resources 0 Accountability (penalties for noncompliant housing plans) 0 Reform (collaborative processes to reform regional housing needs) The Local Government Planning Support Grants Program provides one-time grant funding to regions and ju�risdictioins, for technical assistance, preparation and adoption of planning documents, and process improvements. The over-arching goals of the Program are to, (1) accelerate housing p�roductio�n; and (2) facilitate compliance to implement the sixth cycle olf'th�e regional housing need assessment (RHNA). IV., Program Timeline Grants will be available to eligib�le appl�icants on a noncompetitive, Over-the- Counter (OTC) basis. Applications will be accepted from the date of the release of th�is NOFA and up until July 1, 202,0. See Table 1 below for the anticipated firriellne for awards for the OTC period. Event Date NOFA Release January 27, 2020 NOFA Application Webinar February 14, 2020 NOFA Application Workshops February and March 2020 Final Due Date for OTC Applications July 1, 2020 Technical Assistance February 2020 through December 31, 2023 Expenditure Deadline December 31, 2023 CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 2 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,95 of 768 The Department will review applications within 30 days and target award of applications within 60 days, with sub�sequent Standard Agreements processed within 610 days of award. Applicants are encouraged to submit early in the application window. The Department will hold workshops and a webinar to review the LEAP NOFA and application and will be conducting technical assistance to aid applicants th�rough�out the OTC period and implementation of the grant. For a list of dates, times, and locations for the workshops as well as, information on technical assistance, please visit the D�epartment"s website at h�ttps:�,//www.hcd.ca.gov/qran�ts�-funding�/active-�funding�/leap.shtmi. V. Award Amounts This Program will make $119,0401,000 dollars available to jurisdictions for Program implementation, including state operations and expenditures, and technical assistance. Maximum award amounts are based on population estimates as of January 1, 2019.1 The minimurn award amount is, $25,000. The maximum amou�nt that a jurisdiction may receive pursuant to, this, subdivis,ioln shall be as follows: Jurisdiction Size (in population) Maximum Award Amount 7'50,000 or greater $115001�1000 300,000 to 7491,91991 $750101001 100,000 to 2991,9199, $5010101001 60,000 to 99,9991 $301010001 20,000 to 59,9991 $150,0100, Less than 20,000 $�65110010 Applicants seeking partnerships with other local governments will be additive. For example, two jurisdictions between 100,000 and 299,999 people could submit a proposal for up to $1.01 million. V1. Eligible Apploicants Eligib�le applicants are limited to local governments, i.e., cities and counties. However, local governments may partner through legally binding agreements with other forms of governments or entities where the proposal will have a direct effect Population estimates, posted as of January 1, 2019, are based on the Department of Finance E-1 report. Official maximum amounts per jurisdiction can be found at the Department's website at https-://www.h�cd.ca.g�ov/qrants,-� funding/active-funding/leap.shtml. CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 3 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,96 of 768 on land-use or development within the participating localities. This includes, but is not limited to, partnerships with other localities, regional governments, housing authorities, school districts, special districts, community-based organizations, or any duly constituted governing body of an Indian Reservation or Ranche,ria. Applicants forming partnerships, must submit separate, completed and signed application packaqes, includinq resollutions and a copy of the signed aweement between partners to the Department in order to be awarded funds. V11. Eligible Activities Eligible activities must demonstrate an increase in housing related planning activities and facilitate accelerated housing production. Eligible, activities may be part of a larger planning effort (e.g., a comprehensive zoning code update) 'if proposed activities have, not been completed prior to the N�OFA date, are d�istinct, and demonstrate a nexus to accelerating housing production. Eligible activities are not necessarily jurisdiction-wide and may include a smaller geography with a significant impact on housing production. For example, eligib�le activities may include a housing developmen�t-related project with a significant community level impact, or planning or process improvement for a project with an ongoing community impact beyond the project. Eligible activities may include a variety of p�lanning documents and processes, including, but not limited to, the following as set forth in Health and Safety Code section 505,15.0,31(c),: 1. Rezoning and enco�urag�ing development by updating p�lann�ing documents and zoning ordinances, such as General Plans, community p�lans, specific plans, implementation of sustainable communities' strategies,, and local coastal programs; 2. Completing environmental clearance to eliminate the need for project- specific �review�- 3. Establishing housing incentive zones or other area-based housing incentives beyond State Density �Bonus, Law such as a workforce, housing opportunity ,zone pursuant to Article 10.10 (commencing with Section 6�5620) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, or a housing sustainability district pursuant to Chapter 11 (comm�en�cing with Section 6�6200) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, 4. Performing infrastructure plann�in�g,, including for sewers,, water systems, transit, roads, or other public facilities necessary to support new housing and new residents; 5. Planning documents to promote development of publi�cly-owned land, such as partnering with other local entities to identify and prepare excess or surplus property for residential development; 6. Revamping local planning processes to, speed up housing production; 7'. Developing or improving an accessory dwelling unit ordinance in compliance with Section 65852.2 of the Government Code; 81. Planning documents for a smaller geography (less than jurisdiction-wide) with a sig�nificant impact on housing production, including an overlay district, project level specific plan, or development standards modifications proposed for significant areas of a locality, such as corridors, downtown or priority growth areas; CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 4 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,97 of 768 �J.i Rezoning to meet requirements pursuant to Gov. Code Section 65583(c)(1), and other rezoning efforts to comply with Housing Element requirements, including Gov. Code Section 65583.2(c) (AB 1397, Statutes of 2018); 10.Upzon�in�g or other implementation measures to intensify land use patterns in strategic locations,, such as close proximity to transit, Jobs or other amenities,; 11.Rezoning for multifamily housing in high resource areas (according to Tax Credit Allocation Committee�/Housing Community Development Opportunity Area Maps),- 12.Establishing pre�-app�roved architectural and site plans; 13.Preparing and adopting Housing Elements of the General Plan that include an implementation component to facilitate compliance with the sixth cycle RHNA; 14.Adopting planning documents to coordinate with suballoications under Regional Early Action Planning Grants, (REAP) pursuant to �Health and Safety Code Section 5�0515.02(f) that accommodate the development of housing and infrastructure, and accelerate housing production in a way that alig�ns with state planning priorities, hous,ing, transportation equity and climate goals, including hazard mitigation or climate adaptation, 15.Z,oning for by-right supportive hous,ing, pu�rsuan�t to, Gov. Code section 656�51 (Chapter 753, Statutes of 2018); 16,.Z,oning incentives for housing for persons with special needs, including persons with developmental disabilities-, 17.Planning documents, related to carrying out a local or regional housing trust fu nd-, 18,.Environmental hazard assessments; data collection on permit tracking; feasibility studies, site analysis, or other background studies that are ancillary (e.,g.,, less, than 15 percent of the total grant amou�nt) and part of a proposed activity with a nexus to, accelerating housing production, and 191.,Other planning documents or process, improvements that dernonstrate an increase in housing related planning activities and facilitate accelerating housing production; and 20.Establishing Prohousing Policies, as follows: Prohous[ng Poficies The Department encourages applicants to consider LEAP funds to facilitate designation as a Prohousing jurisdiction. The 20191-20, Budget Act requires the Department to develop the Prohousing designation emergency regulations by no later than July 1 20,21. This program will allow the Department to designate jurisdictions as "Prohousing�," when they demonstrate policies and strategies to accelerate housing production. In turn,,l Proho�using jurisdictions will be awarded additional points or preference in programs such as the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC),l Transformative Climate Communities (TCC), Infill Infrastructure Grant (11G) programs and other state funding programs. The Department anticipates developing emergency regulations and Prohousing designations prior to July 1, 2021 , and will seek to designate jurisdictions prior to future rounds of AHSC, TCC and 11G CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 5 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,98 of 768 programs. Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 65589.9(f)(2), "Prohousing" policies mean policies that facilitate the planning, ap�pr,oval, or construction of housing. These policies may include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Planning for local financialincentives for housing, including, but not limited to, establishing a local housing trust fund-, B. Reducing parking requirements for sites that are zoned for residential devellopment, C. Adoption of zoning allowing for use by right for residential and mixed use development; D. Zo�ning more sites for residential development or zon�ing sites at higher densities than is, require�d to accommodate, the minimum existing RHNA for the current Housing Element cycle-, E. Adoption of accessory dwelling unit ordinances or other mechanisms that reduce barriers, for property owners to create accessory dwelling units beyond the requirements outlined in Section 658,52.2, as determined by the Department; F. Process improvements that reduce permit proces,s,ing �time�; G. Creating of objective development standards; H. Studies and implementing actions that reduce development 'impact, fees; and 1. Establishing a Workforce Housing Opportunity Zo�ne, as defined in Section 65�62,0, or a hous,ing sustainability district, as defined in Section 662010.511 V111. Ineligible Activibes 1. Activities unrelated to preparation and adoption of planning documents, and process improvements to accelerate housing production and facilitate compliance to implement the sixth cycle of the RHNA; 2. Activities that obstruct or hinder �housing production, e.g., moratoriums, downzoning, planning documents with conditional use permits that significantly impact supply, cost, approval certainty and timing, planned development, or other sUmilarly constraining �processes; and 3. Project specific planning documents that do not have a s,ignificant impact on accelerating housing production or significant community level or �re- occurring benefit beyond the project,. 4�. The Department may consider proposals that are combined w1th larger proposals that have a positive housing component and the net effect on accelerating housing production is significant. For example, an applicant may propose combining an open-space designation, downzoning, or anti- displacement measures with by-right up,zoning that has a significant net gain in housing capacity. CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 6 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 6,99 of 768 IX. Eligible Uses 1. Grant funds may cover the costs, of temporary staffing or consultant needs associated with eligible activities; 2. Grant funds shall be used for the costs of preparing and adopting the proposed activity', 3. A jurisdiction that receives funds under this Program may use a subcontractor. The subcontract shall provide for compliance with all the requirements of the Program�., The subcontract shall not re�lieve the jurisdiction of its responsibilitie's under the Program; 4. Eligible expend�itu�res may be incurred and expen�ded for the project(s) subject to the terms, and conditions of the Standard Agreement; and 5. Only approved and eligible costs incurred for work after the NOFA date, continued past the date of the Standard Agreement, and completed during the grant term, will be reimbursable. X. Ineligible Uses 1. Program grant funds may not be used for administrative costs of persons employed by the grantee for activities not directly related to the preparation and adoption of the proposed activity; 2. �No more than 5 percent of the grant amount may be used for administrative costs for any proposed use, to be approved by the Department upon disbursement; and I Approved and eligible costs incurred prior to the NOFA date are ineligible. X1. Application RequiremenIts, Until July 1,1 2020, a jurisdiction may request an allocation of funds, pursuant to this section by submitting a complete application to the Department that demonstrates: 1. A budget, including timelines, deliverables, sub-steps and adoptlon, that demonstrates funds, will be utilized for eligible activities, and uses; 2. How proposed activities will increase housing p�lanning and facilitate accelerating local housing production; 3. Completed or proposed activities consistent with the state or other planning priorities; and 4. All other required information contained in the Department's application Applicants will demonstrate consistency with these requirements utilizing the forms and manner prescribed in the Department application. Accelerating Housing Production: Applicants must propose and document plans or processes that increase housing planning and facilitate acceleratin�g local housing production. The application must demonstrate a significant positive effect on accelerating housing production through timing, cost, approval certainty,, entitlement streamlining, feasibility, infrastructure capacity, or impact on housing CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 7 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 700 of 768 supply and affordability. An application must include an explanation and documentation of the nexus to acce,le�rating housing production based on a reasonable and veriflable, methodology and must utilize the Department)I s form (see the Department's application). A verifiable methodology may incl�ude a statement of support from a non-profit or for-profit developer that is active in the locality., State and Other Planning Priorities: Consistency with state or other plan�n�ing priorities may be demonstrated through proposed activities in the application OR activities that were completed within the last five years. Applicants must self- certify utilizing the Department's form (see Department's application). X11. Application Submission Requ'irements In order to be eligible for grant funding, an applicant must submit a completed, signed original application and an electronic copy on CD or USB flash drive., Applications will be accepted on an OTC basis as of the date of this NOFA �throug�h J�uly 1, 202,0. The Department encourages early applications and will accept applications post-marked by the July 1, 2020 deadline. Applicants may utilize various carrier services, such as the U.S., Postal Service, UPS, FedEx, or other carrier services. All applications must be submitted to the Department at the following address: Cal�l'�fornia Department of H�ousing and Community Development Division of H�ousing Policy Development 2,10,20 West E11 Camino Ave, Suite 5010, Sacramento, CA 915833 Applications must be on Department forms and cannot be altered or modified by the applicant. Program applications and forms are available on the Department's website located at https://www.�h�cd.ca.gov/grants-��fund�ing/active-� funding/leap-shtm]. X111. Application Review 1. The Program will not utilize a competitive process to award funds. 2. Funds will be available to eligible applicants on a rolling OTC basis that begins as of the date of this NOFA and ends July 1, 2020. 3. An application form will be available upon release of the NOFA and will include forms to demonstrate meeting eligibility requirements such as, among other forms, a resolution, a proposed budget and timeline table and self- certified attachments demonstrating a nexus to housing production and consistency with state planning and other priorities; 4. Applications will first be reviewed for, among other things, completeness, eligibility requirements, and accuracy; 5. In order to be considered complete, an application must contain requested CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 8 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 701 of 768 information and supporting documentation where appropriatel; 6. All applications must meet the eligibility requirements as specified in this NOFA; 7. If the application is ine,ligible, it will not be considered for fun�din�g, but may be amended and resubmitted; 8. The Department may request additional information to complete and approve the application for funding; 9. Applications, recommended for funding are su�bject to, conditions specified by the Department; 10.Applications, will be reviewed within 30 days from the date the Department receives the application; and 11.All appl�icants not meeting the eligibility requirements, will be informed within 30 days from the date the Department receives the application. XIV. Award Letter and Standard Agreement Successful applicants will receive an Award Letter from the Department and will be awarded funds. Applicants, will enter into a state Standard Agreement (Standard Agreement) for distribution of funds. The Standard Agreement process will specify,, among other th�ings, the amount of funds granted, timeline for expenditure of funds, and the approved use of funds., Expenditure report dates and other requirements will also be identified in the Standard Agreement. XV. Appeals 1. Basis of Appeals-. A. Upon receipt of the Department 7 s notice deemilng an application incomplete or ineligible, applicants under this NOFA may appeal such decislon(s) to the Department Director. B. The decision of the Director is final and not subject to, further administrative or Judicial review. C. No applicant shall have the right to appeal a decision of the Department relating to another applIcant's ellgibility, award, denial of award, or any other related matter. 2. Appeals Process and Deadlines: A. Process. In order to lodge an appeal, applicants must submit to the Director by the deadline set forth in subsection (b) below, a written appeal which states all relevant facts, arguments, and evidence upon which the appeal is based. No new or additional information will be accepted. O�nce the written appeal is submitted to the Director; no further information or materials is required to be accepted or considered thereafter. Appeals are to be submitted to the Director at following address: CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 9 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 702 of 768 0-*. ualifornia Department of Housing and Community Development Division of Housing Policy Development 2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500 Sacramento,, Cal�iforn�ia 95833 EarlyAction Plan n i�ng@hcd.ca.g�ov The Director will accept appeals delivered through a carrier service such as the U.S. Postal Service, UPS, Fed-E,x, or other carrier services that provide date stamp, verification of delivery. Deliveries must be received during the Department's weekday (non-state holiday) business hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time. Additionally, emails to the email address listed above will be accepted if the email time stamp is prior to the appeal deadline. B. Filing Deadline. Appeals must be received by the Director no later than (5) five business days from the date of the Department's determination. 3. Decision: Any request to amend the Department's decision shall be reviewed for compliance with this �NOFA and its application. The Director shall render h�is/h�er decision in writing within fifteen (15) business, days of receipt of the applicant's, written appeal. The decision of the Director shall be the Department's final decision�, and s,hal�l not be appealable to any court or tribunal. XVL Administration 1. Grant Execution and Term A. The Department will notify the grantee if they have been selected for a grant award; B. After the Standard Agreement has been drawn, the grantee will be provided instructions for signing all required documents. The grantee must submit all supporting materials and a signed Standard Agreement withiln the timeline provided in the instructions, or risk forfeiting the grant award; C. The grant term begins on the day the Department and the grantee have fully executed the Standard Agreement. The Department will notify the grantee and partners when work may proceed under the agreement. However, eligible activities that are approved by the Department may be retroactively reimbursed to the date of the NOFA; and D. The end of the grant term will be determined by the state based on the availability of grant funds and the administrative requirements for liquidation,. CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 10 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 703 of 768 2. Payment and Accounting of Grant Funds A. Grant funds cannot be disbursed until the Standard Agreement has been fully executed; B. The grantee will be responsible for compiling and submitting all invoices and reporting documents. Grantees will submit for reimbursements to the Department based on actual cost incurred; C. The grantee must bill the state based on clear de,liverables outlined in the Standard Agreement or budget timeline. Only approved and eligible costs incurred for work after the NOFA date,, continued past the date of the Standard Agreement, and completed and processed prior to the expenditure deadline, will be, reimbursable. Approved and eligible costs, incurred prior to the NOFA date are ineligible; D. Work m�ust be completed prior to requesting reimbursement-1 E. Grant fund payment will be made on a reimbursement basis; advance payments are not allowed. The grantee and partners must have adequate cash flow to pay all grant-related expenses, prior to requesting reimbursement from the Department. Project invoices will be subm�itted to the Department by the grantee on a quarterly basis; F. In un�usual circumstances, 'the Department may consider alternative arrangements to reimbursement and payment methods based on documentation demonstrating cost burdens, including the inability to pay for work, G. Supporting documentation may include, but is not limited to: receiptsy progress payments, subcontractor involices, time cards, etc.; H. Involices m�ust be accompan�ied by reporting materials where appropriate. Invoices without the appropriate reporting materials will not be paid. The Department may withhold 10 percent of the grant until grant terms have been fulfilled; and 1. Each recipient of funds, under the Program shall expend tholse funds no later than December 31, 2023. 3. Accounting Records and Audits A. The grantee must establish a separate ledger account for receipts and expenditures of grant funds and maintain expenditure details in accordance with the budget and timeline. Separate bank accounts are not required; B. The grantee shall maintain documentation of its normal procurement pollicy and competitive bid process (including the use of sole source purchasing), and financial records of expenditures incurred during the course of the project, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; C. The grantee agrees that the state or designated representative shall have the right to review and to copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of the Standard Agreement; �D. The grantee agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated, E. Subcontractors employed by the grantee and plaid with moneys under the CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 11 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 704 of 768 terms of this Standard Agreement shall be responsible for maintaining accounting records as specified above; F. At any time during the term of the Standard Agreement, the Department may perform, or cause to, be performed, a financial audit of any and all phases of the award. At the Department's request, the awardee shall provide, at its, own expense, a financial aud�it prepared by a certified public accountant. The State of California has the right to review project documents and conduct audits during project implementation and over the project life; G. The Department may request additional information, as needed,1 to meet other applicabile audit requirements; and H. The Department may monitor expenditures and activities of an appilicant, as, the Department deems necessary, to, ensure compliance with Program requirements. 4. Remedies of Nonperformance A. In the event that it is determined, at the sole discretion of the state, that the g�rantee is not meeting the terms and conditions of the Standard Agreement, immediately upon receiving a written notice from the Department to stop work, the grantee shall cease all work under the Standard Agreement. The Department has the sole discretion to determine that the grantee meets the terms and conditions after a stop work order, and to deliver a written notice to the grantee to resume work under the Standard Agreement, B. Both the grantee and the Department have the right to term�inate the Standard Agreement at any time upon 30 days written notice. The notice shall specify the reason for early termination and may permit the grantee or the Department to rectify any deficiency(ies) prior to the early termination date. The grantee will submit any requested documents to the Department within 30 days of the early termination notice; and C. There must be a strong implementation component for the funded activity through this Program, including, where appropriate, agreement by the locality to formally adopt the completed planning document. Localities that do not formally adopt the funded activity could be subject to repayment of the grant. �D. The Department may, as it deems appropriate or necessary, request the repayment of funds frorn an applicant, or pursue any other remedies available to it by law for failure to, comply with Program requ�iremen�ts (Health and Safety Code section 50515.04(e). 5. Reporting A. At any time during the term of the Standard Agreement, the Department may request a performance report that demonstrates satisfaction of all requirements identified in the Standard Agreement with emphasis on eligible activities, e,ligib�le uses, ineligible uses, and expenditures, according to timelines and budgets referenced in the Standard Agreement; B. Awardees shall subm�it a report, in the form and manner prescribed by CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 12 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 705 of 768 the Department, to be made publicly available on its internet website, by April 1 of the year following the receipt of those funds, and annually thereafter until those funds, are expended, that con�tains, the followi�ng information: • The status of the proposed uses listed in the en�tity's application for funding and the correspond�ing impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction; and • A summary of building permits, certificates, of occupancy, or other completed entitlements issued by entities within the region, or by the Jurisdiction, as applicable. C. The awardee must, in lieu of a separate report, provide the above described information as part of its annual report pursuant to Gov. Code Section 65400; D. 'The Department may request additional i�nformatio�n�,, as needed, to meet, other applicable reporting requirem�ents; E. Upon completion of all deliverables, within the Standard Agreement, the awardee shall submit a close out report. See Attachment 1- and F. 'The Department shall maintain records of the following and provide that, information publicly on its internet website: The name olf'each applicant for Program fu�n�ds and the status of that entity's, application; 'The number of applications for Program �fu�nding received by the Department* and 3 The information described in 5(B) above for each recip�ie�n�t of Prograrn funds,. XV11. Right to Modify or Suspend 'the NOFA, and Final Decisimon-makina %%V The Department reserves the right, at is sole discretion, to suspend, amend, or modify the provisions of this �NOFA at any time, including, without limitation, the amount of funds available hereunder. If such an action occurs, the Department will notify all interested parties and will post the revisions to the Diep�artment's website. You may subscribe to the Department 51 s email list here: ht�tp://www.hcd,.ca.g�ov/HCD SSI/subscribe-form.html. Further, the Department's decision to approve or deny an application or �req�ue�st for funding pursuant to, the Program, and its determination of the amount of funding to be provided, shall be final. CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 13 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 706 of 768 XV111. Definitions All terms not defined below shall, unless their context suggests otherwise, be interpreted in accordance, with the meanings of terms described in Health and Safety Code section 50470. A. "Accelerating Hous,ing Production" means improving the timing, cost, feasibility, approval and amount of development through various mechanisms such as zoning incentives (e.g.51 increased density and heightsy reduced parking requirements), upzon�in�g, zoning amendments to permit residential in non-residential zones, corridor planning, development standards modifications, non-discretionary review, financing strategies, sliding scale, fee modifications, facilitating adequate infrastructure to support development, approval streamlining that addresses quickness and ease of entitlementsy and other mechanisms that promote production or remove or mitigate reg�ulatory barriers. B. "Affordability" means a housing un�it that satisfies at least one of the fol�lowing criteria: 1. It is available at an it affordable rent 71 as that term is used and defined in Section 50053 of the Health & Safety Code; 2. It is offered at an it affordable housing cost as that term is used and defined 0 in Section 50052.5 of the Health & Safety Code- or 3. It is available at an affordable rent or an "affordable housing COSL according to the alternative percentages of income for agency-as,s,isted rental and cooperative housing developments pursuant to Department reg�ulations, adopted under Health and Safety Code section 50462(f). C. "Annual Progress Report" (APR) means the annual report requ�ired to be submitted to the Department pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400 of the Government Code. �D. "Completed entitlement" means, a h�olus,ing development p�roject that has received all the required land use approvals, or entitlements necessary for the issuance of a building permit and for which no additional action, including environmental review or appeals,, is required to, be eligible to, apply for and obtain a building permit. E. "Council of governments" means, a single or, multicolun�ty council created by a jolint powers, agreement pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6500) of Divis,ion 7 of T'itle 1 of the Government Code that is res,pons,ib�le for allocating regional housing need pursuant to, Sections, 65584, 65584.04, and 6558,4.05 of the Government Code. F. "Department" means the California Department of Housing and Community Development. CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 14 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 707 of 768 G. "Housing" means any development that satisfies both of the following criteria: 1. At least two�-thirds of the square footage of the development must be designated for residential use; and 2. Includes a house, an apartment, a mobile home or trailer, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied as separate living quarters, or, if vacant, is, intended for occupancy as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live separately from any other individuals in the building, and which have a direct access from the outside of the building, or through a common hall. litc Note: accessory dwelling units (AD,U) and junior accessory dwell�ing u�n�i..... (JADU) pursuant to Gov. Code sections 65852.2 and 658,52.22 meet the definition above. H. "Housing Element" or "element" means, the Housing Element of a community's General Plan, as required pursuant to su�bdivi�sion (c) of Section 65302 of the Government Code and prepared i�n accordance with Article 10.61 (commencing with Section 655810) of'Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. 1. "Juris,dictio�n" means, any city, including a charter city, county,, including a a charter county or city and county, including a charter city and county. J. "Local government" or "Locality" means any city, including a charter city, county, including a charter county or city and county, including a charter city and county. K. "Objective zoning standard", "objective subdivision standard and "objective design review standard 13 means standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official, and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available, and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. "ObjectIve design review standards" means only objective design standards published and adopted by ordinance or resollution by a local jurisdiction before submission of a development application, which are broadly applicable to development within the jurisdiction. L. "Other Planning Priorities" means planning, policies, programs or investments to promote housing choices and affordability to lower and moderate income households, the encouragement of conservation of the existing affordable housing stock, and efforts to take into account current and future impacts of climate change, including hazard mitigation. M. "Regional housing need assessment" means, the existing and projected need for housing for each region,, as determined by the Department pursuant to Section 65584.011 of'the Government Code. CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 15 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 708 of 768 N. "State Planning Priorities" means priorities, which are intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote pu�blic health and safety in the state, including in urban, suburban, and rural communities pursuant to, Gov. Code Section 6504,1.1. 0. "Streamlined Housing Production" means improving the entitlement process through actions such as removing,1 mitigating or minimizing local regulatory requirements, reforming the local approval process to reduce processing times, the number of local discretionary approvals and permits needed for projects, improving approval certainty, establishing non A is,cre�tiona ry processes,1 modifying development standards, such as reducing parking requirements and increasing height l�imits, or other efforts, such as taking the fullest advantage of existing streamlining mechanisms provided in state law. CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 16 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 709 of 768 Attachment 1 Close Out Report�ing Form CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 17 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 710 of 768 LEAP G�rant C�Iose Out Reporting Template �Brief Summary • Overview of the project • Project start date and duration • Project goals and relevance to LEAP goals • Quantified outcomes �Lead Agency and Partnerships • List lead agency and partnerships (including names, titles, organizations, and roles and responsibilities of each) • What did those collaborative relationships and processes look like? Drivers • Did any local�, state, or federal legislation or mandates drive the project.? (SB 357 AB 1397, etc.) • Was it a community driven effort? • Were there additional funding opportunities presen�t? Engagement Process Who were your stakeholders.? What did the engagement process look like? What role did stakeholders play in the process?. (Keep in mind: training, education, council formation, technical assistance, etc.) What were the outcomes of the engagement process? Challenges • What challenges were encountered? • What solutions were encountered or created? • Are, there areas for improvement of po�licy alignment at the state or federal �leve'l to help achieve this project more easily? CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 18 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 711 of 768 LEAP G�rant C�Iose Out Reporting Template Outcomes • What are the current or projected outcom�es? Benefits? • Were outcomes as anticipated? • Have new opportunities arisen as a result of this project.? • What are the next steps? Rep�licabil�ity • What aspects of the project could be replicated in other communities? • Useful resources and tools? For a specific region or sector? Additional Resources • Links to the project itself • Links to resources used throughout and any other relevant resources Further Information • Who can be reached to ask more questions about this project? • Name • Number and/or email CA HCD Notice of Funding Availability 19 Local Early Action Planning Grants 2020 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 712 of 768 ITEM #13 Attachments related to this item will be viewable at. A" 2 Simi M 2 a http://Itwe,n,iink.chulavi"stac,a,.I!,OV:27630/we I n,nnk8 browse.aswvftx.?startli'd.2,23,383 Once they become available. 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 713 of 768 Sheree Kansas Subject: FW:Tuesday 6/23/2020 City Council Meeting From: Raymond Estrada Sent:Wednesday,June 17,2020 7:13 PM To:CityClerk<CityClerk@chulavistaca.g > Subject:Tuesday 6/23/2020 City Council Meeting Warning: External Dear Madam/Sir: I am a resident within District 3,which Stephen Padilla represents. Email i am providing written notice to you that I want to participate in the upcoming meeting of June 23rd and request that my following statement be included in the Bench Documents. On May 27, 2020 a Planning hearing was held to determine if a collision auto repair center would be built within our community. The meeting failed to address the current businesses that are already exceeding noise pollution standards as well as the environmental and health impact to this community. The Planning Commission disregarded the concerns of the residents directly affected by this noise-polluting business and chose to side with the business owner, allowing telephonic input which was denied to us a taxpayers, and proceeded to unabashedly approve construction which was spearheaded by a city employee who presented the proposal! That employee's one-sided presentation was an affront to the voting taxpayers of this community. His distortion of the facts deserves scrutiny by his supervisors as well as the City Manager who should also be protecting the interests of Chula Vista residents. The ongoing noise pollution by existing businesses surely exceeds EPA standards and its impact on our health is a major concern. Please include my comments in the Bench Documents for perusal by Council Members. Sincerely, Raymond Estrada 2020-06-23 Agenda Pack-%et Page 714 of 768 Sheree Kansas Subject: FW:Councilmen meeting scheduled for 6/23/20 To whom it May Concern, I am writing this to request that my concerns be presented at the 6/23/20 council meeting. I am in district 3 with Stephen Padilla as my representative and ask that this e-mail be included as a Bench document. Since early May 2020,1 have reached out to multiple City employees to discuss my concerns in regards to a Auto Collision and Repair shop that has applied to be built very close to my home. My concerns have fallen on deaf ears. I have spoken with Oscar Romero,Tony Cruz,Kelly Broughton and Gary Halbert. I participated in the 5/27/20 Planning Commission Meeting that was held virtually in which Oscar Romero presented a slide show and discussed the proposed business.What was NOT discussed is the fact that there are already two existing businesses to the East and West of this proposed site. Business with a total of over 100 vehicle's that come and go throughout the day.Vehicles that emit constant pollution,noise (back up alarm,car alarm to locate vehicle,generator to wash vehicle) impact on the environment and air quality. These businesses were never talked about and I want to know how can an accurate CEQA be conducted in the area if pertinent information is omitted? My home sits directly above this lot and is in line of site of this business. My children's bedrooms sit at the front of my home and will be the first ones impacted with the fumes from paint,gas,and all other toxins used at an auto collision and repair facility. I need my city counsel man to make sure the citizens come first before revenue. It is clear that Chula Vista can benefit from new businesses but NOT at the expense of our health. I welcome a new business at this lot but NOT this type of hazardous business. I look forward to participating in Tuesdays meeting, Sincerely, Kerri Aviles 2020-06-23 Agenda Pack-%et Page 715 of 768 June18, 2020 Mark Aviles Respective Chula Vista City Council Members and District 3 Council Member: Stephen Padilla I formally write this letter so it can be included in the upcoming city council meeting on June 23, 2020. To be clear, I oppose the bias-planning commissions decision to build an Auto Body Collision and Rep air Facility which is next to our family home. The city planner,, Oscar Romero,failed to provided all the information provided to him regarding resident concerns.Additionally, his slide presentation conveniently omitted; *the proximity of our home to this lot *the other two businesses on either side of the lot in question *NOISE LEVEL produced by these businesses which is less than any Auto Body Shop as Commissioner Nava stated in the previous meeting *how this auto collision shop will address ANY TOXIC FUMES We are not opposed to a business becoming established in this lot, but one that doesn't affect our TRANQUILITY, HEALTH and PROPERTY VALUES. Cordially, Mark Aviles 2020-06-23 Agenda Pack-%et Page 716 of 768 Sheree Kansas Subject: FW:Councilmen Meeting -June 23, 2020 Importance: High From: B C Sent:Thursday,,June 18.,2020 1:34 PM To:CityClerk<CityClerk@chulavistaca.gov> Subject:Councilmen Meeting-June 23,, 2020 Importance: High Warning:: Ext.ernall To whom it may concern: Email I I am writing this email to express my op ion to the following build i-Dg_pr6ect: An Auto Collison and Repair shop has applied to be built on Main Street: We live off Point Estero Dr and Pelican Point Court in Chula Vista(which falls into District 3 with Stephen Padilla). • This proposed shop would literally just be a few feet south from our residential neighborhood. • We understand the need for growth, but oppose having this kind of hazardous business in our"backyard". • Our neighborhood includes especially vulnerable members, like children and elderly,who would be directly exposed to those toxic fumes, and this would have a bad impact on their health. We ask our Councilman, Stephen Padilla, to please watch out for this neighborhood, and put citizens and public safety first. New businesses are always welcome in our neighborhood, as long as they don't jeopardize our health and well being. Thank you very much in advance! Best Beatrix Czink 2020-06-23 Agenda Pack-%et Page 717 of 768 IN III til C1TY' C,0UNC'1L A,GEN' DA STIA, ""EMENT CITY, OF ..................................... CHUIAVISTA June 23,202�O File,ID: 20-0087 TITLE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF A REPORT REGARDING 2020-2025 CONSOLIDATED PLAN FUNDING PRIORITIES AND THE 2020/2021 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FUNDING REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDED ACTION Council conduct the public hearing and accept the report. SUMMARY The City of Chula Vista, on an annual basis, receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program, and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program funds from the U.S., Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to contribute towards a number of diverse programs and services to enhance the quality of life for Chula Vista's low to moderate income residents. 'The City prepares a Five-,Year Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) for the HUD funds describing the housing and community development needs of the City's low-and moderate-income residents and outlines the strategies to address those needs. Each year of the five-year Con Plan period, the City also prepares an Action Plan to, fund specific activities consistent with the Con Plan strategies and priorities. This Public Hearing will provide the community an opportunity to provide input on the proposed 2020/2021 funding recommendations for the City's use of these federal grant programs and the required Five-Year Consolidated Plan for 20,20 through 20,25. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The activity is not a "Project)) as defined under Section 15378 of the State CE,QA Guidelines because the proposal consists of a reporting action,is not for a site-specific projeclt(s) and will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environmental. Therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Under NEPA, the activity is exempt pursuant to Title 241 Part 58.34(a)(2)&(3) of the Code of Federal Regulations and pursuant to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Environmental Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary at this time. Although environmental review is not necessary at this time,once a project(s)has been defined,environmental review will be required and a CEQA/NEPA determination comp�leted prior to initiation of any related project activity. BOARD/COMMISSIO�N/COMMIT"'T"EE RECOMMENDA"rION Not applicable. 1111. 0 0 1 PIi3ge 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 718 of 768 DISC'USSION As an entitlement community with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD),the City receives funds under three block grant programs: Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) The grant amounts allocated to each jurisdiction are determined using a formula based on statistical and demographic data. The funds aim to address HUD's performance measurement framework of providing decent housing, a suitab�le living environment, and to expand economic opportunities principally for low- and moderate-income persons., As a recipient of these HUD funds,the, City is required to prepare a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) describ�ing the housing and community development needs of the City's low- and moderate-income residents and outlining strategies to address those needs over a five-year period. The Con Plan provides the necessary policy guidance for imp�lementation of programs and services to be funded by the HUD grants in addressing the needs and is detailed in its Annual Action Plan prepared each year and submitted to HUD as its application for funding. The City is currently in the last year of'its 2,015-2020 Con Plan. Housing staffhas prepared the Con Plan for the nextfive-year period beginningJuly 1,2020 to June 30,2025,as well as theAction Plan for the 2020/2021 program year. 'The Action Plan is typically submitted to HUD 45 days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. However, due to CO�VID-,19 and the,need to allocate CARES funding immediately,this requirement has been waived. The deadline has been extended to August 14, 202�0. Clatizen Partiocipati"on through Planning Process Engaging residents and community members in defining and understanding the current housing and community development needs and prioritizing resources to address these needs is a key component of the development of the Con Plan. The City is required by HUD to gather input from its residents, including minorities, non-English-speaking persons, Low- and Moderate-Income (LMI) residents, persons with disabilities,advocates for senior,disab�led,illiterate,homeless,and other low-income populations,whom the CDBG program is designed to serve. Public input received is used to establish the strategies and funding priorities aimed at improving the community through the provision of decent housing, a suitable living environment, and growing economic opportunities, especially for low and moderate income residents. These strategies and priorities serve as the City's guidance in its allocation of grant funding for the most appropriate uses. Residents and stakeholders were encouraged to be involved in the prioritization of the grant funds and the development of the Con Plan. In addition to tonight's Public Hearing,staff held a public hearing in March,as well as a Community Needs on-line survey (available in English and in Spanish) which returned 260 responses. P �3ge 12 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 719 of 768 Survey Results: The survey provided the community the opportunity to weigh in on a variety of programs and pro�je,cts that would benefit families and communities in Chula Vista. While the majority of the responses were submitted by community residents,we also heard from local businesses and social service providers. Respondents were given priority options that fit within the HUD-eligible funding categories including: Services for Special Needs-� P�ub�lic Facilities- Public Services for Low Income; Infrastructure; Facilities; I I Services for Homeless;Affordable Housing; and, Economic Development Services for Special Needs Public Facilities (e.g.recreation centers) Public Services for Low Income Infrastructure Facilities and Services for Homeless Affordable Housing Economic Development MENOMONEE= 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 3,0% 35% While the responses were similar to those received in 2015, there was significant increase in Economic Development needs. Each of the priority categories included specific activities and programs that would address the respective needs. Based on those results, the funding priorities for the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan were established (illustrated below). Funding Priorities for the 2,02,0-20�25 Conisolidated Plan and 2020/21 Annual Action Plan The 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan is the strategic plan for allocating and leveraging the entitlement grants described above. It utilizes qualitative and quantitative data gathered through citizen participation, market analysis, and an assessment of need to identify the highest priority needs in which to direct entitlement dollars. The following goals are presented to meet these high-priority needs (in no particular order or ranking) and are generally consistent with the prior Con Plan: P �3ge 3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 720 of 768 M Sim a Mi A a a w ff All a im Grant Entitlement(EN) Cares I(M) Cares,11,(CV11) Total Ali all Funding Requests As part of'the annual Action Plan process, the City releases a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the three grant programs. The NOF'A was released on February 7, 2020, with a submittal deadline of March 6, 2020. Housing staff has reviewed all proposals to ensure comp�liance with the prescribed regulations and consistency with the City's goals and objectives. An executive summary was prepared for each request which summarizes the requested funding level, proposed use of funds, and benefit to the community and are included with this report as Attachment No. 1 (2020/2021 Funding Application Executive Summaries). The federal grant funding recommendations for CDBG,HOME and ESG are presented b�elow: Community Development Block Grant(CDBG): For FY 2020/2021, the, City will utilize an estimated total of $3,239,786 of' CDBG funds. All projects considered for funding must address at least one of the three CD�BG National Objectives: 1) Benefit primarily low/moderate income families; 2) Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or, 3) Meet community needs due to a major emergency such as a natural disaster. Projects are then classified into three distinct categories: 1. Public Services; 2. Community Development; and, 3. Housing Below is a summary of the funding recommendations under each respective category. The project identification number is provided so you may refer to the Application Executive Summaries (Attachment 1). Administratioln,,,,/,,,P,,I,,a,,n,,n,,i,,,n,,g,,,,,,,,,,,,Recommendations: Funds under this category cover all City staff costs associated with the management and administration of Chula Vista's CDBG program including regulatory comp�liance, contract administration., sub�recipient monitoring and fiscal management.This also includes preparation of the required planning documents,such as the Annual Action Plan, the Consolidated Plan, and the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. Federal regulations governing the CDBG program limit the amount that the City spends on administration/planning activities to 20 percent of the entitlement amount for the program year. Table 1: 2020/2021 CDBG Adniffil'stration Funding I I It Ul AA CDBG ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING 1 CSA San Diego County Fair Housing and Tenant/Landlord Mitigation $ 50,000 2 City of Chula Vista Housing Division CDB,G Aduninistration and Planning $ 4051361 Total 4,55P361 Public Services,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,P,,,r,,o,,,gram Recommendation: Funds for Public Services activities are awarded to local agencies and community organizations to implement projects and programs that improve the lives of low-income residents which inc�lude elderly, disabled., at- risk,and homeless.The amount of funds the City may allocate to public services is limited to fifteen percent (15%) of the annual entitlement. Staff s funding recommendations for public service activities are based on funding priorities established in the Con Plan,along with an established ranking criterion which categorizes the programs by community need (Tier 1-111,with I being the highest). P �3ge 5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 722 of 768 Public Services Community Need Ranking Emergency Needs- Special Needs/Disable,d: O�ther General Services: Programs that address Programs that provide services All other services which do not b�as,ic,fundamental needs to persons with disabilities, fall within Tier I or 11 and including shelter,food,and special needs,and are at high- provide general public services other commodities. risk. to low/moderate income A total of sixteen public service applications were received, of which five are new requests. These programs were designed by the applicants to continue providing resources and services to those affected by COVID-19. Programs include a back-to-work training program, childcar�e, childcare with study hall and a child advocate program., Each program uniquely provides services to those most vulnerable in our communitir Y Summarized below are the list of applicants, program name, amount requested, and amount recommended by staff. Table 11: 2020/20�21 CDBG Public Services R I C D BG PUBLIC SERVICES 3 San Diego Workforce Partnership Tech to Hire job Training Prograin $ 200M0 4 Chula,Vista Elementary School Distrlic�t Family Resource Center,Emergency SVCs $ 45,1000 51 City of Chula Vista,Parks and,Recreation, Therapeutic Recreation Programs $ 20,100 6 City of"Chula Vista,Parks and,Recreation, Senior Services-�Norinian Park Senior Center $ 30,000 7 Family Health Centers of San,Diego,Inc. Kid,care Express Mobile Medical Unit(MMU) $ 30,000 8 Jacobs&,Cushman San Diego Food Bank Food 4 Kids Backpack Program $ 15,1000 9 Meals-�on-Wheels Greater San,Diego More than a,Meal for Chula,Vista,Seniors $ 30,000 10 SOL,Ith Bay Community Services South Bay Food Prograin $ 30,000 11 South Bay Community Services Family Violence Support Services $ 175,000 12 Voices for Children Court Appointed Special Advocate Pgin $ 15,1000 13 Alpha Project Take Back the Streets-job Training $ 100�000 14 Chula Vista Recreation Childcare $ 75,1000 15, South Bay Community Services Child,Development and Study Hall $ 200�000 16 McAlister Institute Work For Hope $ 40�000 Total $ 1,0051,100 Capital Improvement Projects (ClPs) and Community Development: After the Public Services and Administration activities are funded,a total of$1,779,325 remains for eligib�le capital improvement projects, public facility improvements, and other housing/community development related activities. To be considered eligible for funding within the CIP category, the project must be located in a primarily residential area designated as low-/moderate-income by the U.S. Census and cannot be regional in nature (serving the entire City or county region) nor along any arterial street.Priority is given to those projects with P �3ge 16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 723 of 768 the most effectiveness and the greatest feasibility by demonstrating leveraging of additional funding sources, benefit and impact to the community, and relevance to the City of'Chula Vista's Critical Needs List and/oIr Pedestrian Master Plan. The City has earmarIked$633,650 for the annual Castlepark Infrastructure Section 108 debt service payment, with eight years remaining on the 20-year loan term. This leaves a balance of$633,650 for other projects. In this case,, the funds will be used as additional funding towards the new Homeless Bridge Shelter facility improvements as well as continue the City's mission of installing new sidewalks in areas where they arIe needed. Table 111: 201201/2021 CDBG Communlity Development Projects 1111giii 1, I NINE;! CDBG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 17 City of Chula,Vista Engineering Bridge Shelter Facility I nip rove inent CGGV025,4) $ 525,1675, 18 South County Economic Development C. MicIrio-IEnterprii I ce Technical Assistance $ 201,000 19 City of Chula,Vista Housing Division, Section 108 Loan,Payment-I Year,12 $ 6331,65,0 20 City of Chula Vista Engineeri I ng New Sidewalk Improvement Project $ 600,000 Total $ ly779y,325, Emergency Solutions Grant(E,SG) Through the traditional ESG entitlement funds for FY 2,02,0/202,1 as well as ESG Cares funding,the City will utilize$2,201,054 towards the following homeless services: • Homeless Prevention-, 0 Rapid Re-Housing(rental assistance); • Street Outreach; Emergency Shelter; and 0 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS). The City received one proposal from South Bay Community Services to provide emergency shelter services at the Casa Nueva Vida shelter (Applicant No. 28). Due the availabilitv of additional ESG funding, a number of CDBG public services programs where shifted from CDB,G to E,,SG to not only categorize them under the appropriate homeless services but to maximize on the fewer,CDB,G funds. Table IV: 201201/2021 E,SG Programs ME ESGPROGRAMS 21 City of"Chula Vista,Housing Division Shelter Operations $ 1,�5,00I,000 22 City of Chula Vista,Housing Division ESG Administration and,Planning $ 3751,000 23 City of Chula Vista Housing Division Rapid Re Housing $ 114,777 24 South Bay Con-iniunity Services Data,Collection: HMJS $ 71,500 25, City of Chula Vista,Housing Division Hotel/m,otel Voucher Prograin $ 5,01,000 26 Interfaith Shelter,Network of San Diego Rotational Shelter,Prograin $ 15,000 27 South Bay Con-iniunity Services Homeless Services Prograin $ 751,000 28 South Bay Community Services Transitional Shelter, -Casa Nu,eva,Vida $ 631,777 Total $ 2120110514, PIi3ge 17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 724 of 768 Home Investment Partnerships Act(HO�ME) HOME funds may be used to provide affordable rental housing and home ownership opportunities through: New construction Acquisition Rehabilitation First time ho�mebuyer assistance, T'enant-based rental assistance, For 2020/2 1,the City will utilize the HOME entitlement and prior year unencumbered funds to address the City's housing priorities of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. Per the HOME regulations fifteen percent (15%) of the, annual allocation must be set aside, to assist Community Housing Development Corporations (CHDO�s) for the creation of affordable housing units. Should these funds not be utilized in a timely manner for this specific purpose,these funds would be recaptured by HUD and unavailable to the City. Table V: 2020/2021 HOME Projects HOMEPROGRAMS 29 City of Chula Vista Housing Division HOME Administration and Planning $ 93,,064 30 City of Chula Vista Housing Division Production of Affordable Housing $ 837,578 Total $ 930p642 Conclusi'on While the ESG and the HOME programs were designed to meet very specific objectives, the CDBG program allows flexibility in the type of activities it funds. This allows the City to leverage its CDBG funds with ESG and HOME to maximize the impact of the grant funds to meet the housing needs of the lower income community. Since the end of redevelopment in California in 2012, the City continues to seek alternative sources offunding for affordable housing related activities. As the cost of housing has increased year after year, far outpacing income growth,, housing has become increasingly unaffordable to more members of the community. Staff recommends that the City Council conduct the public hearing to solicit input from the community on the 2020/21 funding recommendations presented. The 2020/2021 Annual Action Plan and Con Plan was released for the required 30-day review and comment period on May 22, 2020 and will close June 22, 2020. Staff will incorporate all public comments into the final Annual Action Plan,to be brought forward for Council consideration and approval on July 14, 2 0 2 0. DECISION-MAKER(.'ONFLK.'T` Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and c�onsequently, the real property holdings of the City Council members do not create a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal.Govt Code§8,7100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. P �3ge 8 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 725 of 768 CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT At this time, Council is reviewing the funding requests for CDBG, HOME,and ESG funds.This action does not include appropriations.Appropriations for the proposed CDIBG,HOME and ESG programs will be included as part of the City Manager's FY 2,02,0/21 proposed budget. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund as a result of this action. In the remote event that HUD should withdraw the City's CDBG, ESG,, and HOME funding; the Agreements/Memorandum of Understandings L.i provide that the City is not obligated to compensate subrecipients or City Departments for program expenditures. Recommended funding allocations are summarized below. CDBG Administrationil Planning 455,361 Public Services 1,005,100 Section'108 Loan,Payment 633,650 Capital Improvement and Community Development 1,145F675 Subtotal 3,023,90786 IN !'I 001 IN I llffl� HOME Planning and,Administration 93,064 Production of Affordable Housing 837,578 Subtotal 93,00642, ESC Administration and Planning 375,000 Shelter Servicies 14628r777 Homeless Prevention,and,Rapid,ReHousing 197,277 Subtotal 2,201P054, =let" ONGOING FISCAL IMPAC oil There is no ongoing fiscal impact to the City's General Fund as all costs associated with the administration of the CDBG, HOME and ESG programs are covered by the respective grants. Al"TACHMENTS Attachment 1: 2020/2021 Funding Application Executive Summaries Staff Co n ta ct:A nge'lica Davis,Sen io r Ma n agem en t A n alyst Pli3ge 9 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 726 of 768 FEDERAL GRAN F i A EN M rITLEMENT i I PIROGRAMS, grOW/1% r,' 'O"Zo/q/ 0 J/d/07 ME 7 41 F�U N D I N Gi 't"Xt"C U'T I V E SUMMARIES The City released a Notice of Funding Availability for the CD,BG, HOME and ESG grant programs. 'The CITY OF Executive Summaries include an application summary for CHIJILAVISTA each of the funding requests, HOUSING DIVISION A17ACHMENT NO. 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 727 of 768 2020/2021 Federal Block Grant Funding Recommendations, Imiiii 1�111 Jill iii�il���11!11�i�l 1110 1; OEM= Em CI)BG ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING 1 CSA San Diego County Fair Housing and'Tenant/Landloird Mitigation $ 50,000 2 City of Chula Vista Housing Division CDB,G Administration and Planning $ 405�361 Total $ 455J,361 CI)BG PUBLIC SERVICES 3 San Diego Workforce Partnership Tech to Hire Job Training Program $ 200YO00 4 Chula Vista Elementary School District Family Resource Center Emergency Svics $ 45pOOO 5 City of Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Therapeutic Recreation Programs $ 20,100 6 City of Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Senior Services-Norman Park Senior Center $ 30pOOO 7 Family Health Centers of San Diego,Inc. Kidcare Express Mobile Medical Unit(MMU) $ 30,000 8 Jacobs&Cushman San Diego Food Bank Food 4 Kids Backpack Program $ 150000 9 Meals-on-Whee,ls Greater San Diego More than a Meal for Chula Vista Seniors $ 30,000 10 South Bay Community Services South Bay Food Program $ 30pOOO 11 South Bay Community Services Family Violence Support Services $ 1751000 12 Voices,for Children Court Appointed Special Advocate Pgm $ 15P000 13 Alpha Project Take Back the Streets-Job Training $ 100,000 14 Chula Vista Recreation Childcare $ 75pJ000 15 South Bay Community Services Child Development and Study Hall $ 200,000 16 McAlister Institute Work For Hope $ 40pOOO Total $ 1,005,100 CI)BG COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 17 City of Chula Vista Engineering Bridge Shelter Facility Improvement(GGV0254) $ 525,675 18 South County Economic Development C. Micro-Enterprice Technical Assistance $ 20pOOO 19 City of Chula Vista Housing Division Section 1018 Loan Payment-Year 12 $ 633y65O 20 City of Chula Vista Engineering New Sidewalk Improvement Project $ 600pOOO Total $ 1,779,325 ESGPROGRAMS 21 City of Chula Vista Housing Division Bridge Shelter Operations $ 105000000 22 City of Chula Vista Housing Division ESG Administration and Planning $ 375p000 23 City of Chula Vista Housing Division RapidReHou,si'ng $ 114y777 24 South Bay Community Services Data Collection: HMIS $ 7p500 25 City of Chula Vista Housing Division Hotel/Motel Voucher Program $ 500000 26, Interfaith Shelter Network of San Diego Rotational Shelter Program $ 15P000 27 South Bay Community Services Homeless Services Program $ 75�000 28 South Bay Community Services Transitional Shelter -Casa Nueva Vida $ 63p777 Total $ 2,201,054 HOME PROGRAMS 29 City of Chula Vista Housing Division HOME Administration and Planning $ 93�064 30 City of Chula Vista Housing Division Production of'Affordable Housing $ 837p578, Total $ 930,642 MENEEMEMEMEEMEMEM M 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 728 of 768 Application ID Number: 1 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: CSA San Diego County Mission Statement: "Our mission is to promote positive attitudes and actions that ensure respect, acceptance, and equal opportunityfor all people. We are profoundly committed to ensure the well- being of all San Diego County residents. Specifically, our Program Goal is to assist the City of Chula Vista to,provide housing that isfree of discrimination, where conflicts between tenants and landlords are adequately addressed, and where proactive planning occurs to, address needs as they develop." Project I Program: Fair Housing and Tenant/Landlo�rd Mitigation Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program With over 50 years of experience in providing dependable and high quality Fair Housing Description: and Human Rights services in San Diego County,the program/project proposes to: Promote equal housing opportunities and assist victims of' discrimination within all protected classes by providing fair housing consultations, providing tenant/landlord consultation and mediation, assisting victims of discrimination with appropriate referrals,tracking and educating the community about changes in legislation,educating tenants and property owners/managers about their rights and responsibilities and working with local and regional groups, to deve�lop and utilize best practices. CSA will assists clients who believe they are victims of housing discrimination by conducting investigations of these claims and working with the proper regulatory agencies like the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (D,FEH). Project Category: Planning and Administration Target Population: Low Income Persons Number to Serve: 100 CV Goal/Objective: 1: Administration and Planning HUD Eligibility 2 ID - Fair Housing Activities (subject to 20%Adin Cap) Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $50,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 729 of 768 Application ID Number: 2 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Housing Division Mission Statement: "We believe a grea t neigh�borh ood m e,ans n eigh bors kn owing each o ther an d residen ts proud to call Chula Vista home. Our m�ission is to equip and empower Chula Vista's diverse residents with information and the resources to build strongfamilies and to strengthen the social and physicalfabric of the commun�ity. Project I Program: CDBG Administration and Planning Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program Funds will be used for the staff costs associated with the management and Description: administration of Chula Vista's CDBG program., This includes preparation of the required planning documents, regulatory compliance,, contract oversight of the partnering agencies, environmental reviews and fiscal management. Project Category: Planning and Administration Target Population: N/A /'UX Number,to Serive: N/A CV Goal/Objective: 1:Administration and Planning HUD Eligibility 2 1A- General Program Administration Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $450,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 730 of 768 Application ID Number: 3 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: San Diego Workforce Partnership Mission Statement: "The Workforce Partnership is the leaderfor innovative workforce solution�s in San Diego Co�unty. Itfunds and deliversjob train,ing programs that enable alljob seekers to develop the skills and knowled e neededfor in-demand careers. 9 Project 1� Program: Tech-to-Hirle Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program The purpose of TechHire is to help LMI househo�lds, out-of-school youth, veterans, Description: minorities in technology job�s (e.g., women), mature workers (ages 55+), and the long- term unemployed begin their careers in the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) field. TechHirle has a combination of paid work experience,jo�b placement,and subsidized training for participants ages 18 and up. Project Category: Pubilic Services Target Population: Low Income Persons Number,to Serive: 200 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Public Services HUD Eligibility 0 5 H - Employment Training Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $200,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet Page 731 of 768 Application ID Number: 4 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: Chula Vista Elementar y School District Mission Statement: "Enhancing community partnerships to develop and implement coordinated strategies and systemsforfuture generations." Project 1� Program: Family Resource Center Emergency Svcs Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program Low income families vulnerable families will be provided emergency and basic needs Description: services. Families in crisis or emergency situations will be provided with emergency food boxe�s, grocery store gift cards, blankets, clothing, uniforms, ancillary, and transportation services as well as assessed for additional and ongoing services.Families will be assisted in navigating system to find shelter and housing. Project Category: Pubilic Services 'Target Population: Low Income Persons Number to Serve: 350 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Pubilic Services HUD Eligibility 05 - Public Services (General), Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $45,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 732 of 768 Application ID Number: 5 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Mission Statement: We en rich o ur co,m m u n ity with re,crea tio n opplo rtu n ities a n d services. Project I Program: Therapeutic Recreation Programs Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program The Therapeutic Recreation programs began in the City of Chula Vista Recreation Description: Department in 19169. It provided individuals ages five to adult with developmental and/or physical disabilities specifically designed recreational classes and programs they typically would not have access to due to their disability. Previously, the department offered a variety of classes such as bowling, day camps, dances, hip hop, cooking class, aqua exercise, learn to swim, basketball, special events, field trips, wheelchair, sports and tournaments, hand cycling, and other specialty classes and activities., The City also successfully collaborated with other organizations such as the City of San Diego Therapeutic Recreation Services, the Chula Vista Elementary Schoo�l District, the Old Mission Beach Athletic Club (OMBAC) to offer joint programming and special events. In 2008,,due to city-wide budget reductions,the'Therapeutic Recreation programming was eliminated leaving a void of programming for our community of' citizens who have developmental and/or physical disabilities. To date there is no other, organization offering recreation programs or classes exclusively for adults with severe disabilities in the City of Chula Vista. The CDBG Funds will be used to fulfill that unmet need by offering a variety of recreational classes, activities and special 1" Project Category: Pubilic Services Target Population: Disabled/Special-Needs Persons Number to Serve: 50 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Pub�lic Services HUD Eligibility 05P - Disabled Services Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $20,100 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 733 of 768 Application ID Number: 6 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Mission Statement: We en rich o ur co,m m u n ity with re,crea tio n opplo rtu n ities a n d services. Project I Program: Senior Services-Norman Park Senior Center Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program Funding from CDBG would allow us to provide a multitude of unique services and Description: support programs to the elderly in Chula Vista. The grant funds will focus on providing a holistic approach to the health and well being of our,elder,lyby providing them with a number of'opportunities for fun, educational, health and fitness, social, skill building, recreational programs,and activities that will increase the quality of life for the elderly residents in Chula Vista.The unique public services and support programs being offered to the elderly will include: health and nutrition educational workshops, creative enrichment activities,free or low costs group fitness classes, social and brain enriching activities, support groups, and civic engagement through volunteerism. The Norman Park Senior Center,is also a designated "Cool Zone"will offer programming during the hot summer months, so the elderly have a cool and safe place to come and enjoy free activities. Project Category: Public Services Target Population: Elderly Number,to Serve: 100 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Pub�lic Services HUD Eligibility 05A-Senior Services Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $30,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 734 of 768 Application ID Number: 7 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: Family Health Centers of San Diego, Inc. Mission Statement: "Family Health Centers o San Diego (FHCSD) is dedicated to providing caring, affordable, �f high-quality healthcare and supportive services to everyone, with a special commitment to uninsured, low-income and medicall underserved persons. y Project 1� Program: Kidcare Express Mobile Medical Unit(MMU) Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program The MMU is a licensed medical clinic that provides high-quality primary healthcare to Description: persons with low and moderate income, including homeless individuals and families in San Diego's most impoverished neighborhoods.In order to reach our most underserved communities, the MMUs are stationed near various social service agencies, substance abuse rehabilitation facilities, public housing complexes, elementary schools, community centers, and homeless shelters., By bringing healthcare services to convenient ne,ighbo�rhood sites, the MMU program eliminates significant barriers for patients who lack transportation, are uninsured, have mental health issues, or do not have another medical site in their immediate area. The MMUs provide well-checkups, preventative care, immunizations, illness management, health screenings to other services,and insurance assistance. Project Category: Public Services Target Population: Low Income Persons Number to Serve: 430 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Pub�lic Services HUD Eligibility 05M - Health Services Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $30,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 735 of 768 Application ID Number: 8 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: Jacobs &Cushman San Diego Food Bank Mission Statement: "TheJacobs& Cushman San Diego Food Bank provides nutritiousfood to people in need, advocatesfor the hungry,and educates the public about hunger-related issues."' Project 1� Program: Food 4 Kids Backpack Program Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program The Food 4 Kids Backpack Program provides food to elementary school children who Description: receive free/reduced-pirice school meals during the week but risk hunger during the weekends when school meals are unavailable., Project Category: Public Services 'Target Population: Youth Number to Serve: 75 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Public Services HUD Eligibility 05D -Youth Services Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $15,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 736 of 768 Application ID Number: 9 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: Meals-on-Wheels Greater San Diego Mission Statement: "Meals on Wheels San Diego County's(MOWSDC)mission is to,support the independence and well-being ofseniors."' Project 1� Program: More than a Meal for Chula Vista Senior's Grant Program: CDBG 10 Project I Program Description: This project is for MOWSDC to serve 230 unduplicated seniors in the City of Chula Vista with up to two nutritious meals a day accompanied by safety checks and daily in-ho�me social visits, including care navigator support and follow-up care. MOWSDC provides personally delivered meals to seniors in San Diego County daily on weekdays and Saturdays (Sunday meals delivered with Saturday meals),including holidays. All of the meals are prepared according to USDA guidelines for senior nutrition and are reduced- sugar,-sodium, and-fat and include a healthy Latino Cuisine, easy to chew, renal friendly, and gluten-friendly menu options. Every client served is provided with (a minimum) 60% subsidy for all services and further subsidies are provided to those with greater financial need. The MOWSD,C program is designed to address food insecurity, declining health, and social isolation.As part of the It more than just a mealpy service mo�del,staff and volunteer drivers establish a trusting relationship with the senior which allows MOWSDC to monitor quality of life and support seniors as they age at home. MOWSDC has two Care Navigators that respond to any concerns that volunteers observe during meal delivery. MOWSDC's Care Navigators perform referrals to other services and provide hands-on assistance in managing senior's well-being.MOWSDC has recently implemented a Mobile Application for its meal delivery system which reports changes of condition in real time to our Care Navigators. Collectively, the nutritious meals, social visits, and routine safety checks help address three of the biggest threats to successful aging: hunger,isolation,and loss of independence. 1" Project Category: Pubilic Services Target Population: Elderly Number to Serve: 230 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Public Services HUD Eligibility 05A- Senior Services Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $30,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 737 of 768 Application ID Number�: 10 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: South Bay Community Services Mission Statement: "South Bay Community Services transforms communities to support the well-being and pro�sperity of children,youth andfamilies. Project 1� Program: South Bay Food Program Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program Description: The South Bay Food Program is the largest in Chula Vista,and currently coordinates a number of food distribution efforts: * Food for Families,provides over 10,000 pounds of food/household items to homeless and low income individuals and families each month. Staff and volunteers break down pallets of food and create 30-40 pound packages which include dry food,fresh produce,and non- food items like cleaning supplies, diapers and other household items.This program operates on the second Wednesday of the month from 4-6 pm. * SBCS' In-House Emergency Food Program,is comprised of food from public and private drives as well as community donations,and allows those in need to receive both non- perishable food items and fresh produce on an as-needed basis. The South Bay Food Program serves low income families in predominately Western Chula Vista,including children,adults and senior citizens,many of whom are DV Victims,Abused Children and homeless or at-risk of homelessness. In addition to food, Food Program participants are provided with nutrition information, education and resources.They also have access to SBCS'wraparound continuum of services including emergency shelter,transitional housing and affordable housing;the Communities in Action Program; as well as crisis intervention,employment assistance,children's services and assistance applying for benefits.The South Bay Food Program is more than just food-it provides families with the ingredients to prepare healthy and nourishing meals,along with the education and resources that they need to develop healthy,self-sufficient lifestyles. 1" Project Category: Pubilic Services Target Population: Low Income Persons Number to Serve: 300 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Pub�lic Services HUD Eligibility 05 - Public Services (General), Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $30,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 738 of 768 Application ID Number�: 11 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: South Bay Community Services Mission Statement: "South Bay Comm,unity Services transforms communities to support the well-being and pro�sperity of children,youth andfamilies. Project 1� Program: Family Violence Support Services Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program The Family Violence Treatment Program includes the following services and activities: Description: Therapeutic counseling and crisis intervention services to adult and children victims of family violence,which include the following activities: o DVRT for emergency responses, 24 hr. hotline assistance for DV victims, and 2,4 hr. access to emergency shelter; o Strengths-based Assessments and Safety Planning for DV victims and their children; o Individual counseling and group/family counseling- o Unique therapeutic pire-school, Mi Escuelita, for child victims of family violence, and o On-going case management and support for victims All clients also have access to any of SBCS' other programs including emergency and transitional housing,financial self-sufficiency services,and/or job development. All Family Violence Treatment Program services are on-going and CDBG funds will assist SBCS to maintain/increase the number of calls responded to through the DVR1T�- the entry point for many victims to get the assistance they need to re-build safe, stable and healthy lives for themse�lves and their children. Project Category: Public Services Target Population: Victims of Domestic Violence Number to Serve: 300 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Public Services HUD Eligibility 05G- Battered and Abused Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $175,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 739 of 768 Application ID Number�: 12 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application ExecutiveSummary Applicant:: Voices for Children Mission Statement: "Vo�icesfor Children's(VFQ mission is to transform the lives of abused, abandoned, and neglected children in San Diego Countyfoster care by providing them with Court Appo in ted Sp ecial A dvo ca tes(CASAs). Project 1� Program: Court Appointed Special Advocate Pgm Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program Description: The mission of Voices for Children (VF'C)"s CASA program is to transform the lives of foster children by providing them with Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASAs).CASAs are volunteers who provide a single child or sibling group with comprehensive advocacy in court and in the community. VFC will provide CASAs to a total of 1,700 foster youth in FY 2020-2021, and another 6010,youth will be served by VFC staff advocates.An estimated 200 children who reside in the City of Chula Vista will spend time in the foster care system during FY 2020-2021.VFC will assess the cases of each child,and provide CASA or staff advocacy to approximately 12 5 of these children with the greatest needs.A grant from the City of Chula Vista CDBG program will specifically fund advocacy services for seven (7) of these children and case assessment and monitoring for an additional five children.These twelve children will be the beneficiaries of this CDBG project. VFC CASAs and staff advocate on behalf'of'children, ensuring their needs do not slip through the cracks of the overburdened foster care system.,VFC ensures that foster youth obtain access to the services and resources they need to heal from trauma and reach their potential.Advocacy typically happens in the following ways: * Educational Advocacy: Advocates attend school conferences,interface with educators,request educational assessments)and monitor a child's academic progress.In some cases,the court limits the educational rights of a biological parent if he/she is absent or unable to engage in a child s education.More than 25%of VFC CAS,As hold educational rights for their case children and act as key decision makers in matters of education.*Vocational Support/Financial Literacy: Advocates help youth explore career options,complete job applications,and prepare for interviews.Advocates assist youth in comp,leting basic financial planning steps such as opening a bank account,creating a budget,and saving.*Mental and Physical Healthcare Advocacy: Advocates ensure that foster children get consistent access to mental and physical healthcare services.They communicate with medical providers�-track a child's health needs,medications and referrals;and prevent needs from being overlooked when children change placements or spend time in emergency shelters.*Placement Advocacy: Advocates help caregivers to access in-home services to address challenging behaviors. If a particular placement is not equipped to provide a child with the level of support they need, advocates can recommend a placement change to the judge and child welfare professionals.Ultimately,VFC staff and volunteer advocates help,a child to access the services and resources they need to overcome past trauma and reach their potential. Project Category: Public Services Target Population: Youth Number to Serve: 5 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Public Services HUD Eligibility 05N -Abused and Neglected Children Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $15,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 740 of 768 Application ID Number�: 13 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: Alpha Project Mission Statement: "Alpha Project's mission is to empower individuals,families, and communities by providing wo�rk, recovery, and other support services to people who are motivated to change their lives and achieve self-sufficiency."' Project 1� Program: Take Back the Streets -Job Training Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program TBS is a catalyst for, homeless people who are able to work, providing them with Description: immediate transitional employment and training while providing the community with vital cost saving services. The program would work together with our Homeless Outreach Team in the furthering the clean-up efforts in the City, including encampments. Project Category: Pubilic Services Target Population: Homeless Persons Number,to Serive: 20 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Pub�lic Services and III: Homeless Programs HUD Eligibility 0 5 H - Employment Training Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $100,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 741 of 768 Application ID Number: 14 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: Chula Vista Recreation Mission Statement: "We enrich our community with recreation opportunities and services." Project I Program: Childcare Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program The Child Care Program would offer camp settings with different program activities that Description: will not only keep the children busy through out the day but also have educational and healthy lifestyle features. These camps would feature convenient drop off and pick up times for working parents. Protocols will be in place for safety of'the campers and staff, these will include social distancing, wearing masks, health checks, and a camper/staff ratio of 12:2. Additionally, the Tiny Tot Programming would provide preschool programs for ages 3-5 yrs that run from 9-12 pm twice a week. Basically a preparation for a child to transition to kindergarten with proper safety protocols in place. 10 Project Category: Pubilic Services Target Population: Youth Number,to Serve: 20 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Public,Services HUD Eligibility 05L- Childclare Services Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $75,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 742 of 768 Application ID Number�: 15 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: South Bay Community Services Mission Statement: "South Bay Community Services transforms communities to support the well-being and pro�sperity of children,youth andfamilies. Project 1� Program: Child Development and Study Hall Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program South Bay Community Services has been actively responding to the needs of the South Description: Bay residents through emergency food distributions, housing, supporting vulnerab�le clients, providing tutoring to students, and much more. This program provides childcare and academic assistance to low/moderate income families in need to return back to work but do not have care options for their,children. Project Category: Pubilic Services 'Target Population: Youth Number to Serve: 40 CV Goal/Objective: 11: Public,Services HUD Eligibility 051,- Childcare Services Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $200,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 743 of 768 Application ID Number�: 16 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: McAlister Institute, Mission Statement: "McAlister Institute,"s mission is to provide professional services that heal the lives o �f individuals andfamilies, improving the quality of life in communities through the miracle of recovery."' Project 1� Program: Work For Hope Grant Program: CDBG Pro�jeclt I Program Description- The Work for Hope (WFH) program operates as a partnership between McAlister Institute and Chula Vista Police Department's (CVPD) Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) and Chula Vista Public Works Department (CVPWD). The program design leverages existing resources and fills gaps in self-sufficiency, as it facilitates long-term recovery by offering homeless individuals in Chula Vista a means for gaining paid work experience and an overall sense of dignity and pride. Its collaborative service delivery works as follows: CVPD HOT works with McAlister's Homeless Outreach Workers(HOWs)to identify and engage individuals who are homeless.These individuals are screened by HOT for program participation and referred to McAlister's South Bay Enhanced Services Center(SBESC) and accessed to participate in WFH. SB,ESC staff provide case management to help participant identify and address critical needs like identification, Medi-Cal enrollment,housing,behavioral health and other community services. McAlister staff transports participants to WFH worksites identified by the City of Chula Vista Public Works Department (CVPWD). Work crew participants are able to safely store their belongings at a secure designated spot in SBESC during their work-training hours. Toiletries and shower facilities are available at the end of each wo�rkday, and food and water are provided. CVPWD provides on-the-job training and McAlister staff provides worker supervision, continued case management,and linkages to behavioral health services and housing. Participants complete beautification projects in partnership with CVPWD and receive a weekly stipend of$12.50,for each hour of'time spent in work training.Participants also receive support with job placement. The requested funding would increase the current 20 hours work training by eight (8) hours a week from 7/1/2020 through 12/31/2021, bringing the total weekly training available up to 28 hours by providing stipends for additional work training. From 1/01/21 through 6/30/21 the funds would provide the funding for 20 hours of work training stipends (as the other foundation grant revenues will be expended at that time). a Project Category: Public Services Target Population: Homeless Persons Number to Serve: 18 CV Goal/Objective: III: Homeless Programs and V: Economic Development HUD Eligibility 05H - Employment Training Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $40,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 744 of 768 Application ID Number�: 17 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Engineering Mission Statement: "The Department strives to,provide expeditious, cost-effective service while maintaining a high degree of quality optimizing mobility,public and environmental health., and safety."' Project 1� Program: Bridge Shelter Facility Improvement(GGV0254) Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program Funds will be used to complete on-site improvements to the proposed Homless Bridge Description: Shelter site to be located in the southwest area of the City on 27thStreet. Project Category: Community Development 'Target Population: Facilities Number,to Serive: so CV Goal/Objective: VI: Capital Improvement Pro,j ects HUD Eligibility 03C - Homeless Facilities Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $525,6,75 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 745 of 768 Application ID Number�: 18 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: South County Economic Development Council Mission Statement: "To improve and enhance South County's bi-n�ational economy, image and quality of life; and to heighten public awareness of Southern California's most desirable location to live, work and dream."" Project 1� Program: MicroEnterprise Technical Assistance Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program The purpose of the program is to provide small businesess with technical assistance and Description: guidance in navigating the diverse number of resources availabile through local, state and federal programs., 10 Project Category: Community Development Target Population: Small Businesses Number to Serve: 100 CV Goal/Objective: V: Economic,Development HUD Eligibility 18B,- Economic Development Techinical Assistance Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $20,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 746 of 768 Application ID Numberi: 19 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Housing Division Mission Statement: "We believe a grea t neigh�borh ood m e,ans n eigh bors kn owing each o ther an d residen ts proud to call Chula Vista home. Our mission is to equip and empower Chula Vista's diverse residents with information and the resources to build strongfamilies and to strengthen the social and physicalfabric of the commun�ity. Project I Program: Section 108, Loan Payment-Year 12 Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program Funds will be used for the debit service payment of the $9.5million Section 108, Loan, Description: received in 2008 for the Castlepark Infrastructure Program. The project consisted of completion of 11 new streets,including: sidewalks,curbs,gutters,lighting and signage. This represents year eleven of the twenty year term loan. Project Category: Community Development Target Population: N/A /,Ux Number,to Seri N/A CV Goal/Objective: VI: Capital Improvement Pro,j ects HUD Eligibility 19F- Planned Repayment of Section 108 Loan Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $633,650 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 747 of 768 Application ID Number�: 20 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Appli'cant.: City of Chula Vista Engineering Mission Statement: "The Department strives to,provide expeditious, cost-effective service while maintaining a high degree of quality optimizing mobility,public and environmental health, and safety. Project 1� Program: New Sidewalk Improvement Project Grant Program: CDBG Project I Program Funding will be used to continue the City's mission in improving the City's Description: infrastructure and installing sidewalks in areas where they do not currently exist. Location to be determined and brought back to Council for final approval. 10 Project Category: Community Development Target Populati'on: Low Income Areas Number,to Serive: TBD CV Goal/Objective: VI: Capital Improvement Pro,j ects HUD Eligibility 03L- Sidewalk Improvements Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $600,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 748 of 768 Application ID Number: 21 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Housing Division Mission Statement: "We believe a great neighborhood means neighbors knowing each other and residents proud to call Chula Vista home. Our m�ission is to equip and empower Chula Vista's diverse residents with information and the resources to build strongfamilies and to strengthen the social and physicalfabric of the commun�ity. Project I Program: Bridge Shelter Operations Grant Program: ESG Project I Program Funding will support the services to be provided in the homeless bridge shelter Description: including: Crisis Intervention, Homeless Diversion, Intake/Assessment/Triage, Case Management, Housing Navigation, Case Conferencing, Employment Opportunities, Mainstream Resources and Referrals,and Basic Hygiene and Shelter Services. Project Category: ESG Services Target Population: Homeless Persons Number,to Serive: so CV Goal/Objective: III: Homeless Programs HUD Eligibility 03T- Homeless Programs/Ope�rations Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $1,500,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 749 of 768 Application ID Number: 22 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Housing Division Mission Statement: "We believe a great neighborhood means neighbors knowing each other and residents proud to call Chula Vista home. Our mission is to equip and empower Chula Vista's diverse residents with information and the resources to build strongfamilies and to strengthen the social and physicalfabric of the commun�ity. Project I Program: ESG Administration and Planning Grant Program: ESG Project I Program Funds will be used for the staff costs associated with the management and Description: administration of Chula Vista's ESG program. This includes preparation of the required planning documents, regulatory compliance, contract oversight of the p�arltnering agencies, environmental reviews and fiscal management. Project Category: Planning and Administration Target Population: N/A /,Ux Number,to Serive: N/A CV Goal/Objective: 1: Administration and Planning HUD Eligibility 2 1A- General Program Administration Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $375,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 750 of 768 Application ID Number�: 2 3 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Housing Division Mission Statement: "We believe a great neighborhood means neighbors knowing each other and residents proud to call Chula Vista home. Our mission is to equip and empower Chula Vista's diverse residents with information and the resources to build strongfamilies and to strengthen the social and physicalfabric of the commun�ity. Project I Program: Homeless Prevention and Rapid ReHousing Grant Program: ESG Project I Program HPRP is a rental assistance program designed to help prevent and end homelessness by Description: paying a portion a participants rent; up to a maximum of'$1,000 per month and up to a maximum of$1,000 for the security deposit. The tenantIs portion of the rent is flexible based on their current income. Qualifying apartments must be in the City of Chula Vista and under Fair Market Rent. Apartment size is determined by family size. 10 Project Category: ESG Services Target Population: Homeless Persons Number,to Serve: 8 CV Goal/Objective: III: Homeless Programs HUD Eligibility 05 - Public Services (General) Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $114,777 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 751 of 768 Application ID Number�: 24 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Appli'cant:: South Bay Community Services Mission Statement: "South Bay Community Services transforms communities to support the well-being and pro�sperity of children,youth andfamilies. Project 1� Program: Data Collection: HMIS Grant Program: ESG Project I Program jurisdictions are required to collect local, client-level data and data on the provision of Description: housing and services to homeless individuals and families and persons at risk of homelessness. The City subcontracts with South Bay Community Services to provide this service utilizng the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS). HUD uses aggregate HMIS data to better, inform homeless policy and decision making at the federal, state, and local levels. Specifically, an HMIS can be used to produce an unduplicated count of homeless persons, understand patterns of' service use, and measure the effectiveness of homeless programs. Project Category: ESG Services Target Population: Number to Serve: N/A CV Goal/Objective: III HUD Ellogimbility 2 1A- General Program Administration Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $7,500 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 752 of 768 Application ID Number: 25 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Housing Division Mission Statement: "We believe a grea t neigh�borh ood m e,ans n eigh bors kn owing each o ther an d residen ts proud to call Chula Vista home. Our mission is to equip and empower Chula Vista's diverse residents with information and the resources to build strongfamilies and to strengthen the social and physicalfabric of the commun�ity. Project I Program: Hotel/Motel Voucher Program Grant Program: ESG Project I Program Funds will be used to provide bridge housing in the form of a hotel/motel voucher for Description: up to 28, days. Clients accessing the program must have a permanent housing plan in place. Project Category: Pubilic Services 'Target Population: Homeless Persons Number to Serve: 14 CV Goal/Objective: III: Homeless Programs HUD Eligibility 05Q- Subsistence Payments Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $50,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 753 of 768 Application ID Number: 26 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: Interfaith Shelter Network of San Diego Mission Statement: "To provide shelter and other resources to homeless individuals andfamilies and enable those we serve to move toward self-sufficiency by coordinating the efforts ofparticipating congregations,social service agencies, andgo�vernme�ntal programs in assisting the homeless of San Diego County through a cooperative,partnership with faith-based communities." Project I Program: Rotational Shelter Program Grant Program: ESG Project I Program The project will provide seasonal, night-time emergency shelter to homeless low-to- Description: moderate income families and individuals and services to assist moving individuals and families towards transitional or permanent housing. Shelter guests are referred to sub- contracted social service agencies for intake,screening,and on-going case management. 10 Project Category: Pubilic Services Target Population: Homeless Persons Number,to Serve: 15 CV Goal/Objective: III: Homeless Programs HUD Eligibility 05 - Public Services (General) Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $15,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 754 of 768 Application ID Number�: 2 7 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: South Bay Community Services Mission Statement: "South Bay Comm,unity Services transforms communities to support the well-being and pro�sperity of children,youth andfamilies. Project 1� Program: Homeless, Services Program Grant Program: ESG Project I Program The Homeless Services Program combines outreach,assessment and housing placement Description: through emergency shelter', hotel/motel vouchers during inclement weather, transitional housing, and raplid rehousing/tenant-based rental assistance. Through the expansion of these services, SBCS will be abile to outreach, screen and assess more individuals/families, leading to greater rate of placement, and less time spent on the streets. The Homeless Services Program serves homeless individuals and families in predominately Western Chula Vista,including children,adults and senior citizens,many of whom are DV Victims,Veterans and Abused Children living on the streets.In addition to housing screening, assessment and placement, homeless individuals and families receive emergency food and clothing,as well as access to SBCS'wraparo�und continuum of services including emergency shelter., transitional housing and affordable housing; the Family Self-Sufficiency Program; as well as crisis intervention, employment assistance, children's services and assistance applying for benefits. Homeless Services Program is more than just housing - it provides individuals and families with the with the education and resources that they need to develop self-sufficient lifestyles,in order to sustain safe and stable housing. Project Category: Pubilic Services Target Population: Homeless Persons Number to Serve: 50 CV Goal/Objective: III: Homeless Programs HUD Eligibility 05 - Public Services (General), Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $75,000 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 755 of 768 Application ID Number�: 28 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant:: South Bay Community Services Mission Statement: "South Bay Comm,unity Services transforms communities to support the well-being and pro�sperity of children,youth andfamilies. Project 1� Program: Transitional Shelter - Casa Nueva Vida Grant Program: ESG 10 Project I Program SBCS' Casa Nueva Vida I offers the only permanent short-term shelter/housing program Description: for homeless families (with children) in the South Bay region, including victims of domestic violence. Staff utilize a comprehensive strengths-based assessment, afte�r which together with clients they develop an individualized treatment plan, to include any number of services including case management, counseling, employment assistance,childcare,etc.so each client can work to re-establish a self-sufficient lifestyle free from homelessness. Each year,we are unable to house all of the individuals in need of she�lter because Casa Nueva Vida I is full.,Without supportive housing programs like Casa Nueva Vida,more individuals would be forced to live on the streets. Project Category: ESG Services Target Population: Homeless Persons Number to Serve: 90 CV Goal/Objective: III: Homeless Programs HUD Ellogimbility 05 - Public Services (General), Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $63,777 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 756 of 768 Application ID Number�: 29 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Housing Division Mission Statement: "We believe a grea t n eighborh o�od means n eighbors kn owing each o ther an d reside,n ts proud to call Chula Vista home. Our m�ission is to equip and empower Chula Vista's diverse residents with information and the resources to build strongfamilies and to strengthen the social and physicalfabric of the community." Project I Program: HOME Administration and Planning Grant Program: HOME Project I Program Funds will be used for the staff costs associated with the management and T Description: administration of Chula Vista s HOME program. This includes preparation of the required planning documents, regulatory compliance,, contract oversight of the partnering agencies, environmental reviews and fiscal management. Project Category: Planning and Administration Target Population: N/A /,Ux Number,to Serive: N/A CV Goal/Objective: 1: Administration and Planning HUD Eligibility 2 1A- General Program Administration Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $93,06,4 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 757 of 768 Application ID Number�: 30 2020/2021 Federal Grant Funding Application Executive Summary Applicant.: City of Chula Vista Housing Division Mission Statement: "We believe a great neighborhood means neighbors knowing each other and residents proud to call Chula Vista home. Our mission is to equip and empower Chula Vista's diverse residents with information and the resources to build strongfamilies and to strengthen the social and physicalfabric of the com�m,unity. Project I Program: Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program Grant Program: HOME Project I Program Funds will be set aside for the future development/design of' an affordable housing Description: program and proje�ct. Once defined, staff will return to Council for approval. 10 Project Category: HOME Programs Target Population: Homeless Persons Number to Serve: 36 CV Goal/Objective: III: Homeless Programs HUD Eligibility 05S- Rental Housing Subsidies Matrix Code: Amount Recommended: $837,578 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 758 of 768 IN III til C1TY' C,0UNC'1L A,GEN' DA S,TIA, "nEMENT CITY, OF ..................................... CHUIAVISTA June 23,202�O File,ID: 20-0246 'TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY LOANS OF UP TO $9,374,810 FROM THE MEASURE A FUND BALANCE TO THE ALS TRANSPORT FUND FOR THE FUNDING OF PHASE 11 DEPLOYMENT STARTUP COSTS ($4,881,100)AND VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT COSTS ($4,493,100), RESPECTIVELY, TO PROVIDE EXCLUSIVE EMERGENCY AMBULANCE, TRANSPORT SERVICES WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, THE CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH AND THE BONITA SUNNYSIDE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMENCING ON OR ABOUT APRIL 9, 2021 RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On January 28, 2020 Fire Department staff presented to Council an overview of the plan for fire department- based ambulance transport. At that time, City Council approved Chula Vista Council resolution 2020-014 directing the City Manager to engage in all necessary administrative actions to implement fire department- based emergency medical transport services, to begin negotiations for contractual service with the City of Imperial Beach and the Bonita Sunnyside Fire Protection District, and to bring back for City Council consideration and approval any required Council level implementation actions. At a subsequent Fire Department presentation to Council on May 12, 2020, City Council approved the following: Resolution 2020-102 approving terms for a three party agreement for transport services and directing the City Manager, to execute such agreement in final form; Resolution 2020-103 authorizing a purchase agreement with Republic E,VS for purchase of 13 ambulances- Resolution 2020-104 authorizing a purchase agreement with Stryker Medical for gurney systems; Resolution 2020-105 authorizing a sole source purchase agreement with Zo�ll Medical Corporation for cardiac, monitors and autopulse systems; Resolution 2020-106 authorizing a sole source purchase agreement with Motorola Solutions; Resolution 2020-107 authorizing the amendment of the compensation schedule and classification plan to reflect the addition and deletion of various position titles and amendment to the authorized position count in the Fire and Human Resources Departments with an increase in staffing; and approval of the revised FY201 compensation schedule effective May 22, 2020,January 1, 2021,and December 31, 2021 as required. The approval to provide ambulance transport will improve service by adding more ambulance units/hours to the system thereby reducing ambulance response times in the entire system but particularly in east Chula Vista,decrease the costs of transport bills,reduce base rate cost fluctuation,allow for internal administrative control of the transport system, allow for unified dispatch of first responder and transport resources, and 1111. 0 0 1 PIi3ge 1 1 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 759 of 768 provide for more timely and cost effective resolution of transport system issues., Approval to provide ambulance transport will also enab�le the eligibility for and collection of federal reimbursements of approximately$23 million in the first full year and$3.5 million annually thereafter. It is anticipated that the transport program will provide positive net revenue that can be reinvested towards the EMS system components currently being funded by the general fund,and for reinvestment towards improvements to the EMS system. As,the next step towards implementing CV Fire Department operations of the ambulance transport systemY certain start-up costs must be,funded and the purchasing process for the necessary vehicles and equipment must be initiated. In order to provide funding for these necessary costs, this item proposes for Council consideration a temporary loan of'up to $9,374,810 from the available Fire Department Measure, A fund balance to the Fire Department's ALS Transport Fund. The $4,881,100 loan to be used for start-up costs is expected to be paid back in the initial years of ambulance service operations using the final reimbursement payment from AMR at the end of their contract, and thereafter from projected Fire Department ambulance service revenues. The$4,493,100 loan to be used for vehicle and equipment purchases is expected to be paid back in the near-,term out of funds obtained from conventional commercial lease financing,which is pending. As projected,the total payback to Measure A is expected to occur,with no negative impact to other Measure A programs or funding requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project if as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the proposal consists of a governmental p�lan of action related to the City's preparedness in the event of a natural or manmade disaster and which will not result in direct or indirect significant physical impacts on the environment. Therefore, pursuant to Section 1506,0 (c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On June 11, 2020 a staff report was submitted to the Measure A Citizen's Oversight Committee proposing a temporary loan from Measure A to the ALS transport fund to attain vehicle and equipment startup costs to provide exclusive emergency ambulance transport services.At that time,the Measure A Citizen's Oversight Committee voted in favor to support staff s proposal and endorse to City Council the use of a temporary loan from Measure A to the ALS transport fund. DISCUSSION The following is the current timeline for the implementation of City of Chula Vista Fire Department based ambulance transportation on or about Ap�ril 9, 2021. May 12, 2020 Council approval of capital purchases and staffing changes. June/July 2020 Complete purchase of ambulances, gurney systems, cardiac monitors, and communications equipment. P �3ge 2 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 760 of 768 July 2,020 Billing RFP conducted if necessarlIr Y. September 2020 EMS personnel recruitment begins. October 2020 Required 180-day contract termination for convenience. December 2020 EMS BC positions begin transition. February 2,021 All equipment and warehouse inventory prepared., Additional support positions begin to support transition. March 2021 Paramedics complete new EMS emp�loyee orientation academy and field training. EMT personnel complete orientation academy. April 9, 2021 Transport system begins. Initlial Start Up Costs A combination of'methods will be used to finance the phased startup of the transport system, to include utilizing the FY21 ALS budget, utilizing existing fund balances from the ALS fund, cap�ital purchase/lease loans,and temporary inter-fund Measure A-Fire Component loans. Phase I In Phase 1,the proposed FY2 1 ALS budget contains the appropriate funding to complete purchases necessary for medical training equip�ment, unit medical equipment, and initial uniform/PPE purchases. Funding from the existing balance o�f'the ALS fund will allow implementation of items such as faci litie�s 'improve me nts.,and necessary support positions in HR and Fire Administration. Phase I-Funded by Current ALS Program ITEM COST SOURCE City Overhead Departments (July-June) $3171521 ALS Fund Balance Facilities Improvements (Offices,Warehouse, $150,000 ALS Fund Stations) Balance FY21 ALS EMS Training Equipment $75,000 Budget FY21 ALS Portable Medical Equipment $200;000 Budget FY21 ALS Initial Uniforms/PPE $130;000 Budget P �3ge 3 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 761 of 768 Pha,se II The balance of initial costs prior to the system's go-live for the first quarter of operation are requested to be financed with a temporary loan from the Measure A-Fir�e Component funds to the ALS Transport Fund not currently utilized due to the phased approach of improvements in the Measure A program. On June 11, 2020 this funding proposal was b�rou ht forward to the, Measure A Citizen OversiRht Committee for acceptance 9 prior to City Council consideration. Phase 11 proposed funding anticipates a temporary loan from the Measure A- F'ire Component.The Measure A Fire Component F'Y2,1 beginning balance 'is approximately $7.4 million. The Fire Department FY21 total proposed Measure A expenditures is $7.682 million. The estimated 1/2 cent sales tax revenue for the fire department Measure A compo�nent is estimated at approximately $9 million. The FY21 ending fire department Measure A available fund balance is approximately$8.725 million. In Phase 11, continued implementation requires the purchase of a supply vehicle, funding the initial 90 days of medical supplies, funding of new EMS employee orientation for EMT's and Paramedics, funding the implementation of EMS support positio�ns,and increased general liability insurance costs. The first quarter deployment of transport operations will be funded prospectively, as the billing cycle of medical transport requires 90-180 days to recover revenue.These expenses include providing the matching funds for federal reimbursement programs,.transport operational costs, and first responder program costs. The first responder cost will be negated with the last payment of FRALS fees from the existing AMR contract. Phase 11 costs and first quarter deployment costs are shown in the table below. Phase 11 Startup Costs ITEM COST SOURCE Pre-D�ep�loyment Costs FY21 Warehouse Inventory $150,000 Measure A Supply Van $60,000 Measure A EMS Academy(4 Weeks) $200,000 Measure A Transport Support Positions Hired $300;000 Measure A Liability Coverage $75,000 Measure A Total of Pre-Deployment Funds $785;000 Deployment Costs-4thQuarter FY21 QAF Matching Funds $125,000 Measure A P �3ge 4 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 762 of 768 IGT Matching Funds FY22 QTR 1 $900,000 easure A Transport Costs FY21 QTR 4 $2)�291�990 Measure A FRALS F�Y21 QT�R 4 (Reimbursed 7/1/2021 by AMR) $779,720 Measure A TOTAL $4p881x710 The Fire Department is seeking to pay for the Phase 11 startup costs by utilizing a temporary loan in the amount of$4,881,710 from the available FY21 Measure A-Fire Component fund balance of approximately $8.,725 million to the ALS Transport Fund in. Caplital Purchases The last component ofstartup costs is the major capital equipment necessary to operate a transport system. Capital purchases comprise the largest portion of the system startup costs and can be classified as one of the four following categories: ambulances, gurney systems, cardiac monitor/res us citation equipment, and communications equipment. It is anticipated that these collective purchases will be obtained through an existing or futur�e capital p�urchase/lease bank loan and be r�epaid over the first five full years of operations through existing transport baseline budget allocations. Ambulances The process of selecting a vendor for purchasing ambulances involved soliciting preliminary quotes from three separate vendors that are currently listed on the Houston Galveston Area Council (HGAC); Medix Specialty Vehicles, Frazer, and Braun Northwest. The request was for a Type I ambulance on a 1-ton or greater diesel chassis, to include installation of customer specific equipment as part of the manufacture process. HGAC conducted a competitive solicitation for ambulances and Medix/Southwest Ambulances was chosen to be the lowest most responsible and responsive bidder�. In order to procure these vehicles,the Purchasing ARent has determined that the award of this contract is consistent with Section 2.56.140 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code Cooperative Purchasing Agreements. The HGAC award to Medix/Southwest Ambulances under contract AM10-,18 was competitively bid and complies with the City of Chula Vista procurement policy,. The City of Chula is a current member of HGAC,member number 17-6246. Gurney S,ystem After detailed research of the two gurney systems in the marketplace, the fire department determined the most functional and safe gurney system is the system produced by Stryker. A preliminary quote was requested per the Savvik RFB 2019-05. Savvik conducted a competitive solicitation for gurney equipment. Stryker Medical responded to the RFB. In order to procure this gurney equipment,the Purchasing Agent has determined that the award of this contract is consistent with Section 2.56.140 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code Cooperative Purchasing Agreements. The Stryker Medical bid under Savvik RFB 2019-05, was competitively bid and complies with the City of Chula Vista procurement policy. P �3ge 5 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 763 of 768 Zoll Medical Equipment The cardiac monitor and mechanical comp�ression system currently used by Chula Vista,Imperial Beach,and Bonita Fire Departments is manufactured by Zoll Medical Corporation.The fire department has replaced all cardiac monitors and Autopulse systems within the last 6 years,with a total of 20 X Series Monitors and 17 Autopulse devices currently deployed in the EMS system. To provide continuity of care and universal function,the department is purchasing identical equipment from Zoll Medical Corporation. Zoll Medical Corporation is the sole source distributor of its products. The city has designated Zoll as a sole source contract for the last 11 years. Motorola Radio Communications Equipment Motorola radio equipment is required for all 13 ambulances being purchased to provide transport services. The equipment includes mobile radios, portable radios, accessories and installation of the equipment. The radio equipment is purchased via a sole source agreement per City of Chula Vista Resolution 2011-131. The following table illustrates the costs for capital purchases. ITEM Quantity Total Ambulances 13 $2;815J85 Stryker System 13 $700)882 Zoll 11 $747,845 Motorola 13 $22�8)888 Total $4p493,100 Once again, it is anticipated that these capital purchases will be purchased through an existing or future capital purchase/lease bank loan. However, the capital purchases are time sensitive in terms of purchase order approvals, build time and actual delivery of equipment. A funding source must be in place prior to Counc�il approval to open the purchase order with the vendor. In the event the bank loan is not acquired within the proper timeframe that would allow for Council approval of the purchase order to meet the April system go-live deadline,an alternate funding solution must be in place. As an alternate solution, Fire Department staff is recommending an additional temporary Measure A-Fire Component loan for capital purchases in the amount of $4,,493,100. This alternate solution identifies a funding source and will allow staff to bring the cap�ital purchase item forward to Council for approval of the purchase order. Council approval of the item will secure the order and allows the vendor to begin building the equipment without delays that would impact the ambulance transport start time. If a capital purchase/lease bank loan is acquired, the additional temporary Measure A-Fire Component loan in the P �3ge 16 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 764 of 768 amount of$4,493,10�O will not be utilized. Instead, staff will return to City Council for authorization and approval of the bank loan as the funding source for the capital purchases in place of Measure A funds. This strategy works well since the actual payment for capital purchases is due upon delivery of the equipment- not at time of the order�. In the event a capital purchase bank loan is acquired prior to Council consideration of a Measure A loan on June 23, 2020, staff would seek Council approval for only the Measure A-Fire Component funds necessary for Phase 11 costs ($4,881,710). Under either scenario, the final temporary Measure,A-Fire Component loan amount is anticipated to be $4,881,710. The table, below shows the requested loan amounts and available FY21 Measure A-Fire Component fund balance,. ITEM Source Total Phase 11 Costs Measure A $41881)710 Capital Purchase Costs Measure A $4)493JO0 Total Potential Loan Amount $91374)810 FY21 Available Measure A-Fire Component fund (1) $8)725)214 (1) The timing and amount of the Measure A loan may be adjusted as the impact on Measure A revenues,as a result of COVID-19 is determined. LOAN DETAILS It is anticipated that the City will use a temporary interfund loan from Measure A Fund to the Ambulance Transport Fund to fund Phase 11 costs including various vehicles and equipment purchases until a capital lease can be secured. An interfund loan will carry an interest rate equal to the City's pooled investment rate of return,currently approximately 2.2%. This interest rate continues to fall as investments mature and new investments are being purchased at much lower rates. The Measure A fund will receive any accrued interest owed to the fund until the capital lease is secured.With the projected revenue from transport,the temporary loan from the Measure A- Fire component is projected to be repaid well within the first five full fiscal years of operation. CONCLUSION Measure A-Fire Component balances are an appropriate use of resources for startup funding of the Fire Department based ambulance transport system.Measure A startup funds will directly improve public safety service delivery by bringing ambulance transport under one unified system.The new system will contribute to the reduction of EMS first unit arrival times by providing a greater distribution of resources as well as improved resource availability and reliability while decreasing transport base rate costs to residents by more than$1,000. The approval of temporary Measure A-Fire Component loans will help to allow for unified management of the entire EMS system, improved dispatching of ambulance units and provide the opportunity for timelier P �3ge 17 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 765 of 768 and more cost-effective reso�lutio�n of'transport system issues.Approval to use Measure A for startup costs will also enable the eligibility for and collection of federal reimbursements of appro�ximate,ly$2,.3 million in the first full year and $3.5 million annually thereafter. Its anticipated that the system will provide positive net revenue that will be reinvested towards the EMS system currently being funded by the general fund,and for implementation of system improvements., The loan will be repaid with interest further improving fund balances to be used for Fire Department staffing enhancements. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT' Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500�-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section 18704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision. Staff is not independently aware and has not been informed of any other basis for a potential conflict. CURREN''T-YEAR FISCAL IMPACI There are no general fund impacts as a result of this action. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There are potential positive ongoing general fund impacts related to transitioning Ambulance Transport System in-house but unknown at this time. P �3ge 8 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 766 of 768 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZINGTEMPORARY LOANS OF UP TO $9,374,810 FROM THE MEASURE A FUND BALANCE TO 'THE ALS TRANSPORT FUND FOR THE FUNDING OF PHASE 11 DEPLOYMENT STARTUP COSTS ($498819100) AND VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT COSTS ($4,493,100), RESPECTIVELY TO PROVIDE EXCLUSIVE EMERGENCY AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICES WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, THE CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH AND THE BONITA SUNNYSIDE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMENCING ON OR ABOUT APRIL 9, 2021 WHEREAS, on May 12, 2020,the City Council approved Chula Vista Fire D�eplartment's proposed Emergency Ambulance Services program, including program operational plans, required vehicles and equipment, required staffing, and overall projected program costs and revenues. WHEREAS, A combination of methods will be used to finance the phased startup of the transport systern,, to include utilizing the FY21 ALS budget, utilizing existing fund balances from the ALS fund, capital purchas,e/lease loans, and a temporary loan from Measure A — Fire Component to the ALS transport fund. WHEREAS,, the Fire Department is seeking to fund the Phase 11 startup costs by utilizing a temporary loan in the amount of $4,881,710 from the available FY21 Measure A-Fire Component fund balance to the ALS Transport Fund. The Fire Department projects that the loan will be repaid using AMR's final reimbursement payment under the City's exp�iring ambulance services contract plus revenues generated from the initial years of the Fire Department's ambulance services operations, but no later than after 5 years of ambulance service operations. WHEREAS, the Fire Department is seeking an additional Measure A-Fire Component loan to fund vehicle and equipment capital purchases in the amount of$4,493,100. WHEREAS, Council approval of this loan will allow the Fire Department to secure the vehicle/equipment purchase in order for the vehicle/equipment vendor to begin building the equipment without delays that could otherwise adversely impact the desired commencement date for Fire Department ambulance transport services. If a capital purchase/lease bank loan is acquired, the additional temporary Measure A-Fire Component loan in the amount of$4,4,93,100 will be repaid using those funds. WHEREAS, any and all loaned amounts will be repaid with interest at a rate equal to the City's pooled investment rate of return, currently approximately 2.2%. WHEREAS, as a result of the projected timing for repayment of the loans, and the applied interest rate, the Measure A Fire component will not be adversely impacted 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 767 of 768 Resolution No.: Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, and all other information presented by the CVFD, and others, at the June 23, 2020, City Council meeting, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby authorize and direct the City Manager to finalize and execute a temporary loan from Measure A -Fire Component Fund Balance to the ALS transport fund for the funding of Phase 11 deployment startup costs and vehicle and equipment costs, as presented, in the not to exceed loan amounts of $4,881,100 and $4,493,100, respectively, with interest accruing at the City's pooled investment rate, and repayment at the earliest practical date! from the sources and revenues described above. Presented by Approved as, to form.- Jim Geering, Glen R. Googins, Fire Chief City Attorney 2020-06-23 Agenda Packet, Page 768 of 768