HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1981/09/08 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday - September 8, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. ~Co~n~'~mbe~s~i~ub~c~'Se~i~es~B~ding
ROLL CALL
Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen McCandliss, Scott, Gillow, Cox
Councilmen absent: None
Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg
The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hyde, followed by a moment of
silent prayer.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES for the meetin~ of September 1, 1981
MSUC (McCandliss/Scott) to approve the minutes, with the correction to reflect that
Councilman Cox voted "no" on item 13 regarding amendment of the ordinance regulating
games permitted in cardrooms.
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
a. Proclamation proclaimin9 October 2 and 3, 1981 Lion's Club White Cane Da~s
Mayor Hyde presented the proclamation to Mr. Rick Hannum, representing the Chula
Vista Lion's Club, commenting that 100% of the funds raised on White Cane Days are
used directly to replenish Sight Conservation funds to assist the needy with sight
problems.
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
a. Bob Graham, 1425-184 Palace Gardens, reported that a death had occurred at the inter-
section of Orange and Second Avenue and appealed to Council to take action to reduce
excessive speeding at that intersection.
MSUC (Hyde/McCandliss) to ask staff to look into the fatality mentioned by Mr.
Graham at or near the intersection of Second and Orange and report back to the
Council with recommendation if there is any action the Council should take on the
matter.
b. Jerry Valk, 291 Camino Vista Real, requested that a member of the Environmental
Review Commission and Planning Commission attend the joint school district meeting
on September 10, and he distriEuted a bulletin regarding rent control and in-
clusionary housing published by the National Association of Realtors. iqayor Hyde
directed the City Clerk to post copies at the City Hall and the Public Services
Building public bulletin boards.
c. James Bennett, 981 Telegraph Canyon Road, referred to the recent canyon fire
near his home and the lack of response of the Chula Vista Fire Department, and
requested follow up information regarding the incident. Responding to Mayor
Hyde, City Manager Cole explained that the staff's report was in the process of
being photocopied. The report concerns the policy of the Fire Department ~hi. ch resulted
in actual response by the State Division of Forestry; that the Fire Department
would routinely have called in the Forestry Division because of the rough terrain
and Chula Vista's lack of four-v~qeel drive equipment; that in the opinion of the
Battalion Chief the location of the fire was not threatening the house, and that
if there had been any danger to the structure (Mr. Bennett concurred that there
was no imminent danger to his home) that the Chula Vista Fire Department would have
acted.
d. George Chacon, 3340 Del Sol Boulevard, San Diego, said that he recently was a
patient at Chula Vista Community Hospital and commented on the thick brush at the
hospital entrance off Telegraph Canyon Road; he cautioned Council on the lack of
access in the event of a fire for fire fighting equipment and requested that Council
consider either an alternate roadway for hospital access and egress in case of fire
or urge the responsible parties to clear the brush at the entrance.
MSUC (Hyde/Scott) that the recommendations be referred to staff for investigation
and appropriate action.
City Council Meeting -2- September 8, 1981
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. Claims a§ainst the City: (1) Joseph Russo~ 366 Camino Elevado, Bonita~ CA 92002
(2) Robert Stephens~ 366 Camino Elevado, Bonita~ CA 92002
Claims have been filed a§ainst the City by Richard Engouist on behalf of his
clients, Joseph Russo and Robert Stephens in the amount of $5,000 each alleging
false imprisonment, battery and emotional distress. Due to remote liability on
the part of the City, Risk Management staff recommended that Council deny both claims.
MSUC (Gillow/Cox) to deny both claims.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
5. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO REVISE GENEP~AL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR POINT ROBIIIHOOD AT 1675 BRANDYWINE AVENUE (DIRECTOR
OF PLANNING)
This being the time and place advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing.
Director of Planning Peterson referred to his staff report and commented on the
history of Council and Planning Commission consideration of the Point Robinhood
development. He noted that the applicant proposes to develop the southerly 0.8
acre of a designated 1.7 acre convenience commercial site located at the southeasterly
corner of Brandywine Avenue and Sequoia Street with 14 two bedroom townhouse units.
The proposed overall density (3.2 dwelling units per acre) is below the density
range of the General Plan for this area (4 to 12 dwelling unit/acre). Director
Peterson explained that the second phase of development for the conmlercial center
was planned as a one and two-story split level structure of retail and office
space; however, the lieu of the second phase commercial development, applicant
proposes to construct a 14-unit two-bedroom townhouse project in two buildings;
access will be provided by the existing driveway located in the center of the project.
He commented that the project was approved by the Design Review Committee on July 16,
1981, subject to certain conditions; that on August 12, 1981, the Planning Commission
adopted the Negative Declaration on IS-81-84, and recommends that Council approve
the revision for the Brandywine Planned Community in accordance with Resolution
PCM-82-1.
Director Peterson responded to Council questions and commented that the RV storage
lot is a permanent facility owned by the Point Robinhood Homeowners' Association
and that the future elementary school site south of the development is owned by
the Chula Vista Elementary School District.
Robin Casey, representing applicant, Robinhood Homes, addressed Council in support
of the revised development plan and commented that addition of the 14 units on an
otherwise undeveloped parcel would provide security for the existing RV storage lot.
Frank Nash, 1599 Point Delgado Road, a property owner in Point Robinhood, spoke
against development of the 14 units, stating in the contrary that security of
the RV lot would be decreased because the structures would reduce visibility of the
lot, and because residents would not be members of the Point Robinhood Homeowners'
Association.
There being no further comments either for or against, the hearing was declared closed.
Discussion ensued regarding security of the RV storage lot; its jurisdiction within
the Point Robinhood H~meowners' Association; and relationship of the 14 two-bedroom
townhouses as rental units which would not be part of the Point Robinhood Homeowners'
Association.
a. RESOLUTION NO. 10615 APPROVING REVISION TO THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
POINT ROBINHOOD
The resolution approves revision of the General Development Plan for the Brandywine
Planned Community to provide for development of 14 two-bedroom townhouse units on
the southerly 0.8 acre of the designated t~? acre convenience commercial site
located at the intersection of Brandywine Avenue and Sequoia Street.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN COX; the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
City Council Meeting -3- September 8, 1951
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (continued)
6. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF REVOCATION OF TAXICAB CERTIFICATE FOR
MACK'S HACK (CITY ATTORNEY)
Charles McMillan, dba Mack's Hack, was recently convicted of aiding aliens in
entering the United States illegally, and it appeared that he used his taxicab
in commission of the offense. Accordingly, Council initially set August 25, 1981,
as the public hearing date for consideration of revocation of his taxicab certifi-
cate. Mr. McMillan requested continuance of the hearing for 60 days in order to
schedule witnesses in his behalf, and has requested that Border Patrol Agent Pelosi,
who will not be available until September 22, be present.
MSUC (Hyde/McCandliss) to continue the pu§lic hearing to September 22, 1981.
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING
7. RESOLUTION NO. 10616 APPROVING CHANGE ORDER #1, BAY BOULEVARD, "E" TO "G" STREETS
AND "F" STREET WEST OF BAY BOULEVARD (CITY ENGINEER)
The resolution authorizes the City Engineer to execute change order #1 increasing
the contract cost by $18,200 and extending the contract completion date to
December 4, 1981 for installation of certain public i. mprovements at the inter-
section of "F" Street and Bay Boulevard in the Bayfront Redevelopment Area. City
Engineer Lippitt noted that the present property owner, Risi Industries, Inc.,
has entered into a contract with Sapper Construction to complete installation of
the improvements which were previiously deferred pending completion of contract
negotiations with Risi Industries.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT; the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
8. RESOLUTION NO. 10617 ADOPTING BUILDING VALUATION MULTIPLIERS FOR 1981/82
[DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING)
The resolution adopts new building valuation multipliers that reflect the actual
cost of construction and provide uniform valuations within San Diego County
jurisdictions.
Director Grady explained that the uniform valuations provide a means of determining
value of structures to assess permit fees and to provide standardized statistical
data for the Department of Commerce regarding value of construction activity in any
given city.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOI~N MCCANDLISS; the reading of the text was waived
by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
9a. RESOLUTION NO. 10618 APPROVING POOL RENTAL RATE.AGREEMENT .B~TWEENiTHE CITY nF
CHULA VISTA AND THE SWEETWATER-U]~ON-----~GH SCHOOL ~ISTRICT
(DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION)
b. RESOLUTION NO. 10619 APPROVING POOL RENTAL RATE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AND THE CHULA VISTA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
The resolutions approve adjustments to the agreements to cover the increased costs
of operating and staffing the swimming pools and enables the City to recover operating
costs for pools and all staff expenses incurred during the districts' programs.
Director Pfister noted the significant changes and commented that the 1975 agree-
ments provided for fixed fees, whereas the revised agreements provide a fixed fee
for only the pool rental, all other charges to be based upon actual cost of services
at the time services are used (i.e. life guards, aquatic aids, instructors).
RESOLUTIONS OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN COX; the reading of the texts was. waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
City Council Meeting -4- September 8, 1981
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING (continued)
lO. RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE r~AYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND BAY GENEP~AL HOSPITAL FOR THE CITY TO
ACCEPT AS A GIFT AND INSTALL A SENIOR CITIZENS CONVERSATIONAL
EXERCISE TP~AIL IN VISTA SQUARE PARK (DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND
RECREATION)
The resolution approves the agreement with Bay General Hospital by which the
hospital grants to the City as a free gift an $8,000 Senior Citizens Conversational
Exercise Trail with the provision that the trail be installed and maintained in a
City park which is convenient to Senior Citizens. Director Pfister noted that of
all City parks studied, Vista Square Park appeared to be best suited because of its
flat topography and central location, explaining that the exercise circuit is
designed for individuals over forty years of age and consists of 15 individualized
stations that participants travel between at their own pace.
Ruth Blank, representing Bay General Hospital, commented on the cardiovascular
health benefits that senior citizens would derive. She disagreed with staff's
recommendation to install the equipment in Vista Square Park, suggesting Memorial
Park as an alternative and displayed graphics illustrating placement of ~the.equipment
in Memorial Park.
Discussion focused on alternative locations for the exercise trail; it was noted
by Council that while Memorial Park would be a readily accessible location for
senior citizens, that the equipment would create congestion within the park;
Council suggested the area behind the Library as a suitable site, and questioned
the degree of liability exposure in the case of post-cardiac patients usin§ the
equipment.
Speaking in favor of the exercise trail and the Memorial Park location were Ann
Fabrick, 501-2 Anita Street, who in addition to her presentation, submitted a
petition signed by 71 senior citizens in favor of installation of the facilities
in the east portion of Memorial Park, and Margaret J. Helton, 162 Mankato, who
distributed an article and photograph of the exercise trail in use by senior
citizens.
MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to direct staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission to
look at the possibility of the Library park site and come back with a recommendation
and a report from the City's Risk Management consultant regardi, n§ the question of
liability to the City.
lla. RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING THE FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT 80-20 CHARTER POINT
UNIT 1 (CITY ENGINEER)
b. RESOLUTION NO. ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES FOR
APACHE DRIVE AND OTAY LAKES ROADi NAMING AND DEDICATING
SAID STREETS FOR PUBLIC USE
c. RESOLUTION NO. ACCEPTING CASH BOND OF $15,000 FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION
OF "B" STREET AS SHOWN ON THE TENTATIVE MAP
d. RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING THE AGREEMENT NOT TO PROTEST THE FORMATION OF
A REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF TELEGRAPH
CANYON ROAD
e. RESOLUTION NO. AMENDING CONDITION 17 OF RESOLUTION 10276
f. RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING A LIEN AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
City Engineer Lippitt commented on his written report noting that on September 30,
1980, by Resolution 10276, Council approved the revised Tentative Map for Chula
Vista Tract 80-20, Charter Point. He reported that the Final Map for Unit 1
(of three units) has been completed, consisting of 104 condominium units on six
common lots and that all conditions of approval applicable to unit 1 have been
fulfilled, except for #17, which provides the completion of Telegraph Canyon
Road prior to occupancy of any units.
City Attorney Lindberg recommended continuance and informed Council that Pacific
Scene has requested that further consideration of the Final Map be postponed pending
discussions regarding security for the offsite portions of Telegraph Canyon Road
improvements.
City Council Meeting -5- September 8, 1981
f. RESOLUTION NO. (continued)
MSUC (Scott/Cox) to continue the matter for two weeks.
12. RESOLUTION NO. 10620 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF CORONADO FOR THE PRO-
VISION OF DATA PROCESSING SERVICE~ (DIRECTOR OF POLICY
ANALYSIS AND PROGRAM EVALUATION)
The resolution approves a revised agreement for data processing services with the
City of Coronado, replacing the March 1, 1980 contract. Director of PAPE Thomson
summarized the new agreement noting that the major change is the addition of six
months of computer programming. For this service, Chula Vista will receive $18,000
tn addition to the payments for regular computer operations services. The contract
also increases the data entry component of the computer operations charges from
$9.00 to $10.00 per hour.
Mayor Hyde directed that the Council be informed of the administratively adjusted
rates referred to in the last paragraph of Section 4 entitled "Service Charges."
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCIL)~AN GILLOW; the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
13. ORDINANCE NO. 1951 ADOPTING THE ONE AND TWO,FAMILY DWELLING CODE, 1979 EDITION
(DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING)
Director Grady reported that on June 28, 1981, the Board of Appeals and Advisors
considered the adoption of the One and Two-Family Dwelling code, 1979 edition, in
order to provide a single document for those contractors concerned only with
construction of one and two-family dwellings, and also to conform to a uniform
document to be used throughout the United States. He commented that Council has
formally adopted the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical
Code and National Electric Code, and that all applicable sections of those regula-
tions have been consolidated into one volume strictly pertinent to one and two-family
dwelling construction.
MSUC (McCandliss/Hyde) to place the ordinance on first reading; the reading of the
text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
14. ORDINANCE NO. AMENDING CHAPTER 5.20 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING
GAMES PERMITTED IN CARD ROOMS (CITY ATTORNEY)
At the meeting of September t, 1981, Council directed that the amendment to the
ordinance be revised to eliminate authorization of any type of jackpots. Accord-
ingly, the ordinance has been revised to (1) spec!fically prohibit any jackpots;
(2) increase the maximum charge per hour to $3.50, and (3) to permit Hi-Lo Split
poker which is a combination of high and lo-ball.
Council questioned the rationale for the various changes in the amendment to the
ordinance and noted that the original ordinance was not submitted with the amended
version for comparison. Additional discussion took place and the City Attorney
explained each revision noting in particular that the increase in maximum bet
from $20 to $30 would be the highest maximum permitted in any jurisdiction in
the County. Further comments concerned review of the effects of the amended
ordinance after six months; increased fees for policing and enforcement of the
ordinance; and objection to the $30 maximum bet since it would lead to excessively
high stakes and return to the $20 maximum.
MSUC (Cox/Hyde) to refer the amended ordinance back to staff and ask that they
come back to the Council with more detailed rationale and explanation as to why
they are suggesting the amendment; that the ordinance presented show the existing
ordinance with the deletions deleted and the additions added; that the referral
to staff include the City Manager; and that the old ordinance be in force with the
prohibition against jackpots.
MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to direct staff to come back with a brief report on whether
the City is experiencing increased costs for policing and comments as to whether or
not the ordinance should be changed in that regard.
Council also requested review of the entire fees being charged for specific types
of licensing for cardrooms.
City Council Meeting -6- September 8, 1981
CONTINUED MATTERS
15. Report on Third Avenue street tree replacement pro~ram (Director of Planning and
Street Tree Committee)
Landscape Architect Sennett reported that pursuant to Council direction at its
September 1 meeting, the Street Tree Committee met on September 2nd to consider
alternatives to the Peppermint Tree for replacement of the Victorian Box tree,
bearing in mind Council's preference for a flowerin§ variety. Consequently,
the Chinese Flame and Hong Kong Orchid were recommended by staff and the Committee
as the best suited varieties. Mr. Sennett presented slides depicting the Chinese
Flame and Hon§ Kong Orchid trees in various seasonal and growth stages and ex-
pressed strong preference for the Chinese Flame for the nodes and planter boxes
along Third Avenue, between '~E" and "F" Streets and "F" to "G" Streets.
Following the slide presentation, Mr. Sennett responded to Council queries regarding
the growth characteristics of the Chinese Flame and referred to it as a "well
behaved tree" that would be extremely well suited for replacement of the Peppermint
tree and would be very consistent with the design manual guidelines for the Town
Centre area.
Mayor Hyde noted that the recommendation of the Street Tree Committee was to plant
the Chinese Flame from "F" to "G" Streets when the new street improvements are
completed, and that the Hon§ Kong Orchid be used from "I" to "K" Streets. Ad-
ditional Council discussion concerned use of palm trees and Councilman Scott
expressed particular preference for palm trees, pointing out that they would pro-
vide variety along with use of deciduous flowering trees and would help preserve
a landscaping character traditionally and historically associated with Chula Vista
and Southern California heritage.
MSUC (Hyde/Gillow) to select the Chinese Flame for use between "E" and "F" Streets.
MSC (Hyde/Gillow) to plant Chinese Flame for new street tree planters in nodes and
planter bo×es between '~F" and "G" Streets; Councilman Scott voted "no".
MSC (Cox/Gillow) to replace palm trees between "I" and "K" Streets with Hong
Kong Orchid trees; Councilmen Scott and McCandliss voted "no".
16o REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER
a. City Manager Cole distributed the staff report prepared by the Director of Public
Safety re§arding the canyon fire near the Bennett property which was not available
earlier in the meeting, and said that Mr. Bennett had been given a copy.
b. Mr. Cole distributed the tentative agenda for the September 10, 1981 joint school
district meeting.
c. Report - Consideration of issuance of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds re-
quested by the San Diego Gas & Electric Company.
Referring to his written report, City Manager Cole commented that a request was
received from Mr. Richard Korpan, Vice President/Finance and Treasurer of SDG&E,
dated August 26, 1981, for consideration of the possibility of the City utilizing
the provisions of AB 74 which grants to charter cities the authority to issue IDB's
for specified projects. With this mechanism, SDG&E has the opportunity to utilize
the tax exempt status of industrial development revenue bonds to finance significant
portions of its construction program for electric and gas facilities, and ulti-
mately to pass on savings in interest costs directly to its electric and gas
customers in the form of lower and less rapidly increasing energy costs. Mr.
Cole requested Council authorization to proceed with the City Attorney with the
development of an appropriate ordinance and drafting of procedures for the possible
issuance of IDB's, and noted that the City of San Diego recently placed in motion
procedures to permit marketing of IDB's for SDG&E improvements in San Diego.
Art Bishop, Regional Affairs Representative for San Diego Gas and Electric, ad-
dressed Council concerning SDG&E's proposal and emphasized that the utility
company would be required to guarantee that every dollar saved would go back to
the rate payers. Mr. Bishop responded to Council questions concerning inclusion
of a fee in the undergrounding formula to enable the City to §o forward with
undergrounding of major thoroughfares at current costs rather than waiting and
ultimately paying inflated costs. He commented that the legalities have not
yet been worked out, but that the concept of financing the undergrounding is a
possibility.
City Council Meeting -7- September 8, 1981
16. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER (continued)
MSC (Scott/Gillow) to authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to proceed
with the development of an appropriate ordinance and procedures for the potential
issuance of industrial development bonds. Councilwoman McCandliss voted "no".
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS
17. Report on Bonita Optimist Club's marathon request (Director of Parks and Recreation)
On June 23, 1981, Council approved the request of the Bonita Optimist Club to
conduct a half marathon on Sunday, September 13, 1981. The Club has requested
that the date be changed to September 27, 1981.
MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to approve the date change.
18. ~eport on shared housing research grant (Director of Parks and Recreation)
Director of Parks and Recreation Pfister reported on the shared housing research
program presented to Council on September l, 1981, by Margaret Helton on behalf
of the South County Council on Aging. Director Pfister commented that the grant
process involves an extraordinary application process whereby the City would act
as a contract agency for the South County Council on Aging (SCCOA) which in turn
would subcontract to the City for service delivery. He stated that the grant in
question is being provided by the Area Agency on Aging (AAA) in the amount of
$35,000 for the purpose of establishing a research program in the South Bay area
to determine the number of homes having room(s) to share with senior citizens
and to determine the numbers of seniors seeking such accommodations. He noted
the unresolved issues associated with the proposal and commented that although
implementation of a Shared Housing Program would significantly benefit the City's
Housing Assistance Plan, he cou}d ~Ot~suppor~-hav~g~the~C~ty~be ~he]apptica~
of this proposal.
Speaking in favor of City sponsorship of the grant were: Margaret Helton, 162
Mankato, who commented on' the geographic boundaries of the South County area;
provided income and housing statistics for the area; and commented on phasing
of the program including data collection and checking the City's housing element
to find if changes might be necessary because of zoning or because of housing
locations lying in the unincorporated County area. Ann Fabrick, 501-2 Anita
Street, commented on the intent of SCCOA to request the City to carry the program
because it already carries the contract with the Area Agency on Aging for I & R
and because of its governmental expertise; Mary Kay Gill, representing the Area
Agency on Aging, 8665 Gibbs Drive, San Diego, responded to Council's questions
concerning source of funds. Ms. Gill commented on SB 1228 regarding shared
housing and stated that Chula Vista's advantage would be in its ability to
computerize the program; that the extent of the City's fiscal responsibility would
be strictly to deliver the funds in the form of a check payable to SCCOA; that
monthly reports would be filed with staff hired and supervised by SCCOA, with
copies of reports directed to the City Manager for assurance that the grant
monies were being spent as intended. Responding to additional Council questions,
she stated that the City would not be liable for any out-of-pocket expenses
which were not identified at the outset of the program. Joyce Beardsley, 1768
Elmhurst, spoke in favor of the program and addressed the budget prepared for
the contract period of 10-t-81 through 6-30-82, and submitted a letter of support
from Meals-on-Wheels dated September 8, 1981.
Housing Coordinator Gustafson commented on his involvement with the request and
alternative sources and amounts of funding such a research program. Additional
discussion ensued regarding the grant deadline of September 10 and it was noted
that the City could elect to withdraw its sponsorship.
MSUC (McCandliss/Gillow) to support the Cilty' as an umbrella organization and
authorize submission of a proposal for a shared housing program and that staff
will then work with South County Council on Aging and "Triple A" to hone this
proposal and work with them toward that and to direct staff to come back to the
Council in two weeks with a report as to whether or not the City should go or
not go.
Additional comment related to the need for assurance of adequate computer time, since
Director of PAPE Thomson had questioned the scope of computer services that would
be required inasmuch as he had ~received ~o~'information prior to this meeting of plans
to use the City's computer.
City Council Meeting -8- September 8, 1981
19.Report on EIR for the developed portion of the City (Director of Planning)
Director of Planning Peterson commented on his staff repQrt, indicating that
during 1981 budget hearings, Council directed staff to report on the feasibility
of preparing a Master EIR for the developed portions of the City in order to minimize
environmental review required for individual properties within an urban area.
Director Peterson commented on the difficulties of preparing such an EIR and the
amount of review required for individual projects, and stated that he would prefer
to work through the League of California Cities for changes in State law pertain-
ing to environmental reviews. Specific obstacles in preparing such an EIR were
noted by Mr. Peterson in his report.
MSUC (Gillow/Cox) to accept the report and determine to work through the League
of California Cities for changes in the State law pertaining to environmental
review.
REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
20. Request for sidewalk improvements for use of Collin~wood Intermediate Care
Facility's wheelchair patients (Human Relations Commission)
Commissioner Dan Brennan presented a request submitted by Cora Copley, Activities
Director of Collingwood Manor, commenting that many of the facility's residents
who shop at the shopping center on "F" Street and Broadway are wheelchair patients
who would benefit from installation of curb cuts on "F" Street from Broadway to
the Civic Center. SHe requested that the matter be referred to staff to determine
methods of funding the improvements and to develop a plan for the specific loca-
tions of the curb cuts.
MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) to refer to staff.
21. ~YOR'S REPORT
a. Appoint of Kenneth H. Kimball to Board of Appeals and Advisors
Mayor Hyde requested ratification of the appointment of Kenneth H. Kimball to
the Board of Appeals and Advisors.
MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to ratify the appointment.
22. COUNCIL COMMENTS
a. MSUC (Cox/Gillow) for a Closed Door Session to discuss pending litigation.
b. Councilman Scott questioned the status of the "H" Street improvements at I-B05.
City Engineer Lippitt responded that the Planning Commission has scheduled a
hearing on September 30; that staff has been working with the individual property
owners and a draft agreement has been prepared and is expected to come before
Council in October; and that after the Planning Commission hearing, if an agree-
ment has been reached by all parties, it would be appropriate to consider putting
the project back into the budget.
c. Councilman Scott questioned the status of the traffic signal modifications at "L"
Street and Melrose, indicating that conditions have improved and it may not be
necessary to proceed with installation of the signal.
MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) that a report come back to Council on the two "L" Street
traffic signals approved in the budget.
Council adjourned at 9:53 p.m. and the Redevelopment Agency convened to conduct a brief
meeting. The Redevelopment Agency adjourned at 9:55. Council reconvened and ad-
journed to Closed Door Session at 9:55 p.m. The City Clerk was excused and the City
Manager reported that the Closed Door Session ended at 10:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT at 10:00 p.m. to the joint school district meeting scheduled for Thursday,
September 10, 1981, at 4:00 p.m., and to the regular scheduled meeting Tuesday,
September 15, 1981 at 7:00 p.m.
{/~ennie M. Fulasz, CMC, City Cl~'l<