HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-03-17 Item 13 - Resolution A - RevisedREVISED
RESOLUTION __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION,
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (IS16-0004) AND
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA GENERAL
PLAN (MPA18-0003) , THE EASTLAKE II GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(GDP) (MPA18-0004) , EASTLAKE II SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA)
PLAN (MPA16-0019) AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORTY DOCUMENTS
TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM OS-3 (OPEN SPACE)
TO BC-5 (BUSINESS CENTER) FOR A 9.35-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF EASTLAKE DRIVE, IMMEDIATELY WEST OF SR-125.
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically
represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, and commonly known as
Eastlake Self-Storage, and for the purpose of general description consists of 9.35-acres located
on the south side of Eastlake Drive, directly west of SR125 (Project Site); and
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, duly verified applications were filed with the City of Chula Vista Development
Services Department on December 8, 2016 with additional applications filed on April 19,
2018 by Mid-City, LLC (the “Applicant,” “Owner” and “Developer”), requesting approval of
amendments to the Chula Vista General Plan, Eastlake II General Development
Plan/Sectional Planning Area Plan, the Planned Community District Regulations and
associated regulatory documents for the Project Site (Project); and
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various
entitlements and agreements, including: 1) a General Plan, General Development Plan
Amendment and Sectional Planning Area Plan approved by City Council Ordinance No. 2905
on April 15, 2003 and by Resolution Number 2003-140 on April 8, 2003; and 2) amendment
to the Planned Community Land Use District Map approved by City Council Ordinance No.
2925 on July 15, 2003 and approved by City Council Resolution 2003-293 on July 8, 2003;
3) amendment to Planned Community District Regulations and Land Use District Map
approved by City Council Ordinance Number 2999 on April 5, 2005 and approved by City
Council Resolution 2005-102 on March 22, 2005 4) amendment to the General Development
Resolution No. ______
Page 2
Plan and Planned Community District Regulations approved by City Council Ordinance 3018
on September 2005 and by City Council Resolution 2005-288 on August 23, 2005) a General
Plan, General Development Plan and Sectional Planning Area Plan approved by City Council
Ordinance No. 3100 on January 8, 2008 and Resolution No. 2007-299 on December 18, 2007
and 5) amendment to the Sectional Planning Area Plan approved by City Council Ordinance
No. 3203 on September 20, 2011; and
D. Environmental Determination
WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed Project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted an Initial
Study, IS16-0004 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Based upon the results of the Initial Study, the Director of Development Services has
determined that the implementation of the Project could result in significant effects on the
environment. However, revisions to the Project made by or agreed to by the Applicant
would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearl y no significant effects
would occur; therefore, the Director of Development Services has caused the preparation
of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), IS16-0004 and associated Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and
E. Planning Commission Record of Application
WHEREAS, the Development Services Director set the time and place for a hearing on the
Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500
feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project and
voted 3-3-1 resulting in loss motion; and
WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at
the public hearing on the Project and the minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are
incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and
F. City Council Record of Application
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application
and notices of said hearings, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper
of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the
exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the
City Council of the City of Chula Vista in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista
Resolution No. ______
Page 3
Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 6:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations of the
Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
hereby finds and determines as follows:
II. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
That the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, in the exercise of its independent
judgment, as set forth in the record of its proceedings, considered the Initial Study of the
Project conducted by the Director of Development Services for compliance with the
CEQA, and has determined that the Project could result in significant effects on the
environment regarding Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Noise, and Biology. However,
revisions to the Project made by or agreed to by the Applicant would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; therefore,
the Development Services Director has caused the preparation of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, IS16-0004, and Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program.
That the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, in the exercise of their independent review
and judgment as set forth in the record of its proceedings, considered Mitigated Negative
Declaration, IS16-0004, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP),
in the form presented, which has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the
CEQA and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and does
hereby adopt the same.
III. APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
The Chula Vista General Plan Land Use Diagram and tables are hereby amended as set
forth and diagrammatically represented in Attachment 4, a copy of which is on file in the
office of the City Clerk, known as Documents ____, to change the land use designation of
9.35-acres on the south side of Eastlake Drive, between SR125 and Ridgewater Drive from
Open Space to Light Industrial.
IV. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The City Council hereby finds and determines that the General Plan, as amended by this
Resolution, is internally consistent and shall remain internally consistent.
V. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby finds and determines that:
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS DESCRIBED BY THE GENERAL
Resolution No. ______
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN, AS AMENDED.
The proposed amendments to the Eastlake II General Development Plan reflect the land
use, circulation system and public facilities that are consistent with the City’s General
Plan as amended.
PLANNED COMMUNITY CAN BE INITIATED BY ESTABLISHMENT OF
SPECIFIC USES OR SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLANS WITHIN TWO
YEARS OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE.
The proposed amendment to the Eastlake II Sectional Planning area Plan only affects
the 9.35-acre Project Site, which reflect a continuation of the Eastlake II General
Development Plan/Sectional Planning Area Plan policies and development regulations,
that were previously adopted by the City Council.
IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, THAT SUCH
DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSTITUTE A RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT OF
SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY AND STABILITY; AND THAT IT WILL BE IN
HARMONY WITH OR PROVIDE COMPATIBLE VARIETY TO THE
CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA; AND THAT THE SITES
PROPOSED FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES, SUCH AS SCHOOLS, PLAYGROUNDS
AND PARKS ARE ADEQUATE TO THE SERVICE THE ANTICIPATED
POPULATION AND APPEAR ACCEPTABLE TO THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES
HAVING JURISDICTION THEREOF.
Not applicable
ANY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE JUSTIFIED
ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION PROPOSED AND WILL PROVIDE
ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL FACILITIES OF THE TYPES NEEDED AT SUCH
PROPOSED LOCATION.
A Market Analysis prepared for this Project, indicates that the market is favorable to the
development of a modest amount of self-storage spaces and that the potential development
is represented as a “B+” market and the Project Site as a “B+” site.
The Fiscal Impact Analysis Report (the “FIA”) provides information as related to the project
and the analysis of the anticipated fiscal impacts to the City’s General Fund. Based on the FIA
and the assumptions contained therein, annual fiscal impacts are positive starting in Year 1. In
the first year there is a net fiscal surplus of approximately $25,673, followed by surpluses of
approximately $25,793 in Year 2, $26,451 in Year 3, $26,817 in Year 4, and $27,061 in Year
5.
Resolution No. ______
Page 5
THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT CAN BE PLANNED AND
ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPATIBILITY WITH
SAID DEVELOPMENT.
The requested amendments to the Eastlake II Sectional Planning Area Plan include a
Fiscal Analysis that outlines the financing mechanisms to promote the orderly
sequentialized development of the Project. The Project is one of the last remaining areas
of Eastlake II to be developed.
VI. ADOPTION OF AMENDED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in light of the findings above, the City Council
hereby approves and adopts the amended Eastlake II General Development Plan as set
forth and diagrammatically represented in Attachment 4 in the form presented to the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
VII. SPA FINDINGS
A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE EASTLAKE II GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
The proposed amendments to the Eastlake II Sectional Planning Area Plan reflect
land uses that are consistent with the Eastlake II General Development Plan (as
amended) and the City of Chula Vista General Plan (as amended). The light industrial
nature of the proposed Project would be consistent with the adopted Business Center
land uses of the Eastlake area.
The proposed amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and
regulations applicable to surrounding sites and, therefore, the proposed amendments
can be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with said
development.
B. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY
SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREAS.
The requested amendments to the Eastlake II SPA Plan include a Fiscal Analysis that
outlines the financing mechanisms to promote the orderly sequentialized development
of the Project. The Project is the last area of Eastlake II to be developed.
According to the Commercial Lands Analysis prepared for this Project, the 163,386
square-feet of proposed self-storage facility will serve the surrounding residents and
visitors to the area.
Resolution No. ______
Page 6
C. THE EASTLAKE II SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY
AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT,
CIRCULATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The proposed land use text and statistical amendments to the Sectional Planning
Area Plan, and new development standards will not adversely affect the circulation
system and overall land use pattern as previously envisioned in the Eastlake II
General Development Plan. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared
and any impacts associated with the proposed amendments have been addressed by
IS16-0004. Thus, the requested amendments to the Sectional Planning Area Plan will
not adversely affect the adjacent land uses, residential enjoyment, circulation or
environmental quality of the surrounding uses.
VIII. APPROVAL OF SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA AMENDMENTS
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in light of the findings above, the City Council hereby
approves and adopts the Eastlake II Sectional Planning Area Plan, as amended, shown in the
Figures that accompany the Staff Report as Attachment 4 subject to the conditions set forth
below:
1. The Project shall comply with all mitigation measures specified in IS16-0004, to the
satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
2. Prior to the 30th day after the Ordinance approving the PC District Regulations (Ordinance)
becomes effective, the Applicant shall prepare a clean copy of the Sectional Planning Area
(SPA) Plan document by deleting all strike out/ underlines and shading. Where the
document contains both an existing and proposed exhibit, the previous existing exhibit
shall be removed and substituted. In addition, the strike-out underlined text, document
format, maps and statistical changes within the Eastlake II General Development Plan
(GDP), SPA and Planned Community (PC) District Regulations, for the Project shall be
incorporated into the final document and approved by the Director of Development
Services for printing.
3. Prior to the 30th day after the Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall submit to
the Development Services Department 10 copies and a flash drive of the approved
amendment to the Eastlake II GDP, SPA Plan and Eastlake II PC District Regulations.
XI. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented
and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and
maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all
approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of future building permits, deny,
Resolution No. ______
Page 7
revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of
approvals herein granted, instituted and prosecute litigate or compel their compliance or seek
damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by Applicant or successor in interest
by the City approval of this Resolution.
XII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon
enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the
event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by the Court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the City so determines in its
sole discretion, this resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and no further in force or in
effect ab initio.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts this Resolution approving the project
in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19.09.080,
the City Council hereby finds that the requirement for a Public Facilities Finance Plan is hereby
waived because the Project is infill development located in a developed portion of the City where
adequate public facilities exist, therefore there are no public service, facility or phasing needs for
the preparation of a Public Facilities Financing Plan.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this _____ day of ____________ 2020, by the following vote, to-wit:
Presented by: Approved as to form by:
______________________ _______________________
Kelly Broughton, FSALA Glen R. Googins
Director of Development Services City Attorney