Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1986-12657 Revised 9/11/86 RESOLUTION NO. 12657 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE "OTAY VALLEY/PALM AVENUE REORGANIZATION" The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, on November 6, 1985, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12239 initiating an application for the "Otay Valley/Palm Avenue Reorganization", and WHEREAS, this reorganization would involve the annexation of approximately 242 acres presently within the City of San Diego, and WHEREAS, the reorganization will be a detachment from the City of San Diego, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held as advertised on August 5, 1986 and said hearing was thereafter closed, and WHEREAS, on July 7, 1986, the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted a resolution approving the reorganization. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the "Otay Valley/Palm Avenue Reorganization" to annex approximately 242 acres to the City of Chula Vista which is currently within the City of San Diego. Presented by Approved as to form by PlanningG~rge N~em~, ~frector of ~.~h~ma§ J.~rron, city Attorney 1843a ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 5th day of August 19 86 , by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmembers Cox, Malcolm, Moore, Campbell, McCandliss NAYES: Councilmembers None ABSTAIN: Councilmembers None ABSENT: Councilmembers None Ma~~r the City o~~ (~hulo Vista ATTEST (~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of RESOLUTION NO. 12657 ,and that the same has not been amended or repealed DATED ~ City Clerk CITY OF CHULA VISTA CC-660 Minute Item: 15 Ref. No.: RO85-23 RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ~ COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING T~ "OTA¥ VALLEY/PALM AVENUE REORGANIZATION# (CITY OF C~ULAVISTA) On motion of Commissioner Nagel, seconded by Commissioner Bailey, the following resolution is adopted: WHEREAS, a resolution of application was submitted to this Commission for reorganization of territory including annexation to the City of Chula Vista and detachment from the City of San Diego, which resolution was adopted by the City Council of Chula Vista as Resolution No. 12411, dated March 20, 1986, pursuant to Title 5, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed for reorganization is as described in the application on file with the Local Agency Formation Commission; and WHEREAS, the Executive Officer of the Commission has filed her report on said reorganization, which report was received and considered by the Commission; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 56828, the Executive Officer of this Commission set a public hearing on the proposed reorganization for July 7, 1986, and gave notice of the date, time, and place of said hearing in accordance with Govern- ment Code Sections 56834 and 56835; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Commission hereby finds, determines, and orders as follows: (1) The hearing was held on the date set therefor, and due notice of said hearing was given in the manner required by law. (2) At that hearing the Commission called for, heard, and considered all interested parties and read and considered the report of the Executive Officer. (3) The Commission adopts, pursuant to Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the mitigation measures included in the resolution of approval of the City of Chula Vista for the impacts identified in the~Environmental Impact Report prepared by the City of San Diego, and certifies that the mitigation is within the jurisdiction of the City of Chula Vista and not LAFCO because the affected resources and services will be within the city limits upon annexation. (4) The Commission hereby approves the reorganization with modified boundaries, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto. (5) The boundaries of the territory as described in Exhibit A are definite and certain. (6) The boundaries of the territory do conform to lines of assessment and ownership. (7) The territory includes 242 acres and is ~ninhabited. (8) The territory proposed to be reorganized is hereby designated the "Otay Valley/Palm Avenue Reorganization" (City of Chula Vista). (9) The Commission hereby designates the City of Chula Vista as the conducting authority and authorizes the City Council to initiate proceedings in compliance with this resolution. (10) The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this resolution as provided in Section 56853 of the Government Code. - 2 - Passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Diego this 7th day of .July , 19_86 , by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Eckert, Nagel, Gotch, Mahr, Hostler, Bailey, and Dorman NOES: Commissioner Hersom ABSENT: Commissioners Bilbray and Oravec ABSTAINING: None STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) SS I, JANE P. MERRILL, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Com- mission of the County of San Diego, State of California, hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original resolution adopted by said Commission at its regular meeting on J1]]y 7. ]~6 ., which original resolution is now on file in my office; and that same contains a full, true, and correct transcript therefrom and of the whole thereof. Witness my hand this 28th day of July , 19_ 86 Executive Off±cer San D±ego County Local Agency Formation Commission RO85-23 "Otay Valley/Palm Avenue Reorganization" (City of Chula Vista) PARCEL 1 Ail that portion of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24, Township 18 south, Range 2 west, San Bernardino base and Meridian, in the city of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California, according to United States Government Survey, approved Feb- ruary 26, 1870, lying within the following described boundaries; Beginning at the northeast corner of said northeast quarter of the southeast quarter; 1. Thence south 0° 28' 33" west, 1341.12 feet along the easterly line of said quarter-quarter to the southeast corner thereof; 2. Thence south 89° 42' 04" west, 1069.30 feet along the southerly line of said quarter-quarter to the easterly line of freeway described in Final Order of Condemnation recorded July 22, 1968 as File No. 123488 of Official Records, of said county; 3. Thence north 3~ 47' 10" east, 918.10 feet along said easterly line to an angle point therein; 4. Thence continuing along said easterly line, north 0° 31' 49" east to the northerly line of said quarter-quarter; 5. Thence easterly along said northerly line to the point of beginning. 31.21 ACRES PARCEL 2 Ail of the south half of Fractional Section 20, Township 18 south, Range 1 west, San Bernardino Base andMeridian, in the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California, according to United States Government Sur- vey, approved September 11, 1879, lying within the following described boundaries; Beginning at the west quarter corner of said Fractional Section 20; 1. Thence easterly along the east-west center line of said Fractional Section 20 to the easterly line thereof, said line also being the westerly boundary of Rancho Otay, according to map thereof No. 862,~ records of said county; 2. Thence southeasterly along the easterly line of Fr~ctional Section 20 to the southeast corner thereof; / EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 ¢ ( RO85-23 3. Thence westerly along the southerly line of said Fractional Sect- ion 20 to the corner common to Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30, said Township and Range. ' 4. Thence northerly along the westerly line of said Fr~ctional Section 20 to the point of beginning. 211.38 ACRES Approved by the Local Agency Formation JUL! sc:iw 7/25/86 LAFCO EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 JUL ?