Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1986-12718 RESOLUTION NO. 12718 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE 1985-86 GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista receives Community Development Block Grant funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the implementation of projects to meet federal program objectives; and WHEREAS, the City is required to submit annual Grantee Performance Reports to HUD to report on progress of the City's Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, a City Grantee Performance Report for the 1985-86 year has been prepared; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the 1985-86 Grantee Performance Report. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Community Development Director is authorized to submit the 1985-86 Grantee Performance Report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Presented by Approved as to form by ~g~-~C~u~i t~e~ reltor CC~x~ma ~ ~' Harf~ ' City Attorney/~ ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 16th dO]/ of September 19 86 , by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: C0uncilmembers Malcolm, Cox, HcCandliss, Campbell, Moore NAYES: Councilrnembers None ABSTAIN: Counci lmembers None ABSENT: Councilmembers None ~ Vista STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above ond foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of RESOLUTION NO. 12718 ,and that the same has not been amended or repealed DATED ~ City Clerk cr]Y OF CC-660 Grantee Performance Report u.s, Department of Housing and Urban Development Community' Development I r Block Grant Program OMB No. 2506-0077 (Exp 10/31/86) 2 Grant Number N~m~ ol ¢,a.~ee ~iT85-MC-06-05 City of Chula Vista 40 4 P~rson W~O Can Best Answe~ Questions About This Report Granlee s Address 276 Fourth Avenue t5 Gustafson Chula Vista, CA 92010 5 6. This Report Consists of the Following Forms Showing Progress Achieved Through a. Activity SufT~mary fHUD.4949 2) b. Status of Funds--Part I and Part II (HUD-4949 3) c. Low/Mod Benefit Worksheet (HUD.4949 3a) d. Status of Funds--Part III (HUD.49494) e. Direct Benefit Activities (HUD 49495~ f. Actions to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (HUD-4949 6). g. Displacement (HUD-4949 71. (See HUD Handbook 65 t 0 2 REV 'Enbflement Grantee Performance Report Instructions" for ¢uidance on completing the GPR) 7. This Report Also Contains: a. assessments by the grantee of the relationship of the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to: 1) locally identified community development objectives; i h re uire tha each CDBG assisted ac v y must either benefit Iow and moderate income per- 2) theNatonalOblectveswhc q. r~ tcommun needshavngaparticularugency;and sons, aid in the prevention o e m~natlon o sums or bhght,_ mee Y · a e ate a least 51 percent of all CDBG unds expended during the one, 3) the Primary Ob'ect'vewh~ch requires hat n h.e gg g . ' n will be for activities which bene' ow and two or three consecutive program years spec~hed by the grantee m ~ts cerhhcat~o moderate income persons; b. descriptions of: 1) the nature of and reasons for changes in the grantee's program objectives; and 2) how the grantee would change its program as a result of its experiences; and c. a summary of any comments received by the grantee on its program from citizens in its jurisdiction. 8. The Grantee's Authorized Official Representative Certifies That: a. This report contains all items identified in items 6 and 7 above. b, To the best of his/her knowledge and belief the data in this report is true and correct as of the date in item 6. c. Federal assistance made available under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program has not been utilized to reduce substantially the amount of local financial support for community development antivities below the level of such support prior to the start of the most recently completed CDBG program year. United States Code (Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure) shatt appty to the foregoing ' WARNING Section 1001 of Title 18 of the . ' u makes or uses a document or writing con- .... ~ thin s that whoever, knowmgty and wi y cert f cabon. Tdle 18 provides, among other g ' · ' n the 'urisd ct on of any department or agency of the ' ' n false fictitious, or raudulent statement or entry, m any matter wdh . J ta~?~ng a y ~all be f ned not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than bye years, or both. United States, s 8 Typed Name and T[t~e el Authorized Official Representative Previous Edition O~sotef,,~ 24 CFR Part 570 Et HB 0510.2 Gr3nt~e Performence Penor~ t, s nepart,~enr o! H~'using --~- a.d Urba. O.w o?me.t ~ ~ , Community Development Low/Mod Benefit Worksheet : Block Grant Program / / OMB NO. 2506-0077 (Exp. 10/31186) Name Bt Grantee Grant Number Period Covered City of Chula Vista B-85-MC-06-0540 From 7/1/85 ,o 6/30/86 ,Part,~,, ,.h ~,, ~,Direct ~.~..-Expenditures ................ for the Acquisition,~ Construction or Rei~abilitat;3n of Property_for Housin~ Activity Activity Name 132 Housing Rehabilitation 42 42 100 351 351 Sum of Direct Expenditures Part il: CDBG Expenditures Used. Only for Staff and Overhead to Assist in the Acquisition, Construction or Rehabilitation of Property for Housing 133 Code Enforcement 200 200 100 9 9 Sum of Stall and Overhead Costs 9 Part Ill: Total Expenditures This Reporting Period for All Other Activities Qualifying As Low/Mod Benefit 556 Part IV: Total Low/Mod Benefit From Parts I, II and III 916 HUD-4949.3a (1-86) 24 CFR Part 570 Et HB 6510.2 Addendum for FORM 4949.1 7. Assessment of Relationship to Community Development Objectives A. Rehabilitation of substandard housing and improvement of all housing 1. Housing Rehabilitation program spent over $351,000 ($299,000 program income plus $52,000 carry-over). a. 22 single-family homes i. All low or low/moderate income b. 20 mobilehomes i. All low incomes 2. Code Enforcement a. 200 inspections made B. Assistance to low/moderate-income seniors 1. Shared Housing a. 76 homeowners and 76 homeseekers matched i. 67% low income ii. 92% low/moderate income 2. Senior Information & Referral Center a. 20,273 clients served i. 28% of clients over 55 years of age ii. 16% over 65 years of age 3. Meals-On-Wheels a. An average of 140 persons were served quarterly 4. Del Rey Nutrition Program a. 21,300 meals served to seniors 5. Metro Food Project a. Provided supplemental food to 3,000 people per month 6. Adult Protective Services a. 43 senior aides placed in jobs 7. Older Adult Peer Advocacy Program a. 35 senior received Peer Advocacy training b. peer counselling provided to 1854 clients. 7. (Continued) C. Provision of services to families and young persons 1. South Bay Community Services a. Provided counseling to 1,246 youths and families 2. Kinesis South a. Involved 29 people in its vocational training program 3. Metro Food Project a. Provided food to 3,000 people per month 4. YMCA Family Stress Center a. Provided counseling services to 106 families 5. Lutheran Social Services a. 6,337 clients received emergency assistance 6. Slingerland a. Provided tutoring for 78 dyslexic children D. Construction of drainage facilities 1. Construction begun on Woodlawn Avenue Storm Drain 2. Harborside Drainage System Costs to Price Company Reimbursed 3. Environmental Review and Design Work Done on Central Drainage Basin E. Repayment of loan 1. Section 108 loan completely repaid with $125,423.79 in payments F. Provision of Fair Housing services I. Fair Housing a. Handled 37 Fair Housing complaints through Senior Information & Referral Center G. Roadway Reconstruction 1. 115 Handicapped Parking Signs Installed H. Economic Development 1. Utilities Undergrounded to facilitate opening of Home Depot Store & creation of new jobs LUMP SUM NARRATIVE 132 Housing Rehabilitatior 1. Financial institution with which the lump sum agreement has been executed: Bank of America 295 "E" Street Chula Vista, CA 92010 2. Date of agreement: July 25, 1984 Amended contract approved February 25, 1986 3. Date of first loan in FY 1984-85: August 14, 1984 4. Housing Rehabilitation loan rates have been set at 5% and 8.25% and at 5% and 10% for mobilehome rehabilitation. 5. Single family homes: 5% homeowner loan - 73% required collateralization. If bank is not willing to make collateralized loan to applicant, then 100% required collateralization. 6. Mobilehomes: 5% loan - 100% required collateralization. 10% loan - 55% required collateralization. Assessment of Relationship to National Objectives and the Primary Objectives All of the 1985-86 CDBG funded projects meet the primary objective and the national objective of benefit to low and moderate income persons. The Home Depot Utility Undergrounding project assisted the construction of a new store which will provide jobs to low and moderate income persons. All other public works and facilities projects were located in neighborhoods containing more than 51% low and moderate income persons. All houses and mobile homes receiving loans and grants were owned by low/moderate income persons. All public services agencies funded with CDBG funds have documented that more than 51% of their clients are either low income or are senior citizens. The Handicapped Parking Signs project removes architectural barriers and thus, also meets HUD objectives. NATURE OF AND REASONS FOR CHANGES IN PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The 1985-86 program objectives were all followed, with the exception of the reconstruction of deteriorated roadway in low income neighborhoods. When the overall program budget was developed, this item was given a lower priority than the other program objectives and so funding was omitted for any roadway projects. The City regularly carries our roadway reconstruction projects in neighborhoods throughout the City, using funds other than CDBG. CHANGES TO OUR PROGRAM AS A RESULT OF OUR EXPERIENCE Based on our experience during FY 1985-86, we would have reduced the level of funding for the Home Depot Utility Line, the Harborside Drainage Payback and Program Administration. The funds saved would have been applied to another project, preferably a roadway reconstruction project.