HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020/01/14 Agenda Packet ucciare unaer penalty of perjury that I am employed
by the City of Chula Vista in the office of the City Clerk
and that I posted the document according to Brown Act
requirements.
Dated: l 0 Signed:_
�i
M"
My OF
CHULA VISTA
s �
Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor
John McCann, Councilmember- District 1 Gary Halbert, City Manager
Jill M. Galvez, Councilmember- District 2 Glen R. Googins, City Attorney
Stephen C. Padilla, Councilmember- District 3 Kerry K. Bigelow, City Clerk
Mike Diaz, Councilmember- District 4
Tuesday, January 14, 2020 5:00 PM Council Chambers
276 4th Avenue, Building A
Chula Vista, CA 91910
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REVISED 1/10/2020
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Diaz, Galvez, McCann, Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
A. 19-0576 PRESENTATION OF THE 2019 STARLIGHT PARADE
AWARDS TO THE WINNING ENTRIES
CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 - 4)
The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one motion, without
discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or staff requests that an item be
removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request
to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items
pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed immediately following the Consent
Calendar.
City of Chula Vista Page 1 Printed on 111012020
City Council Agenda January 14,2020
�. 20-0023 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of June 18 and July 9, 2019.
Recommended action: Council approve the minutes.
2. 19-0513 A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA DESIGNATING AND SETTING ASIDE
CERTAIN CITY-OWNED REAL PROPERTY CURRENTLY
KNOWN AS D STREET WEST OF WOODLAWN AVENUE
FOR PARK AND RECREATIONAL PURPOSES
B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE PARK MASTER PLAN
FOR D STREET PARK LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF
D STREET, WEST OF WOODLAWN AVENUE, AND THE
NAME WESTVIEW PARK
Department: Development Services Department
Environmental Notice: The Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines Section 15304 Class 4 (Minor
Alterations to Land) and Section 15332 Class 32 (In-Fill Development
Projects).
Recommended action: Council adopt the resolutions.
3. 19-0579 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA MODIFYING THE APPENDIX TO THE LOCAL
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE TO AMEND THE
MANAGEMENT ANALYST POSITION TO INCLUDE ALL
LEVELS, DELETE THE POSITION OF FINANCE AND
PURCHASING MANAGER, AND ADD THE POSITIONS OF
FINANCE MANAGER AND SMART TECHNOLOGY
OFFICER TO THE LIST OF OFFICIALS WHO ARE
REQUIRED TO FILE PERIODIC STATEMENTS OF
ECONOMIC INTERESTS
Department: City Clerk
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the
California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore,
pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental
review is required.
Recommended action: Council adopt the resolution.
City of Chula Vista Paye 2 Printed on 1/10/2020
City Council Agenda January 14,2020
4. 20-0004 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.19.050.D TO
ELIMINATE ONE-YEAR WAITING PERIOD APPLICABLE TO
CERTAIN NEW CANNABIS BUSINESS LICENSE
APPLICANTS (FIRST READING)
Department: City Attorney & City Manager
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project' as defined under Section 15378 of the
California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to
State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it has also been determined that the activity
qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California
Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines.
Recommended action: Council place the ordinance on first reading.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council on any subject matter
within the Council's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally
prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda,
but, if appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter
to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes.
ACTION ITEMS
The Item(s) listed in this section of the agenda will be considered individually by the Council and
are expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill
out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the
meeting.
5. 20-0009 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AMENDED MEASURE A
PUBLIC SAFETY EXPENDITURE PLAN TO ADD THREE
PEACE OFFICERS, ONE POLICE AGENT, AND FOR THE
NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION UNIT, ONE PARALEGAL
AND ONE CITY ATTORNEY INVESTIGATOR; AND
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020 EXPENDITURE
BUDGET FOR THE MEASURE A SALES TAX FUND TO
FUND SUCH POSITIONS OUT OF MEASURE A - POLICE
DEPARTMENT AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE (4/5 VOTE
REQUIRED)
City of Chula Vista Page 3 Printed on 111012020
City Council Agenda January 14,2020
Department: City Attorney & Police Department
Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the
California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore,
pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental
review is required.
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORTS
6. 20-0019 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE FOLLOWING:
-Joycelyn Persichilli, Commission on Aging
-Bernardo Andrade, International Friendship Commission
COUNCILMEMBERS' COMMENTS
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
CLOSED SESSION
Announcements of actions taken in Closed Session shall be made available by noon on
Wednesday following the Council meeting at the City Attorney's office in accordance with the
Ralph M. Brown Act(Government Code 54957.7).
7. 20-0025 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING
EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9(a)
Jesse Hernandez, et al. v. Jaime Moreno, City of Chula Vista,
et al.
Case No. 37-2018-00055704
ADJOURNMENT
to the regular City Council meeting on January 28, 2020, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers.
Materials provided to the City Council related to any open-session item on this agenda are available for
public review at the City Clerk's Office, located in City Hall at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building A, during
normal business hours.
City of Chula Vista Page 4 Printed on 1/10/2020
City Council Agenda January 14,2020
In compliance with the
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend,
and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact the City Clerk's Office at(619)
691-5041(California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least
forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting.
Most Chula Vista City Council meetings, including public comments, are video recorded and aired live
on AT&T U-verse channel 99(throughout the County), on Cox Cable channel 24 (only in Chula Vista),
and online at www.chulavistaca.gov. Recorded meetings are also aired on Wednesdays at 7 p.m. (both
channels) and are archived on the City's website.
Sign up at www.chulavistaca.gov to receive email notifications when City Council agendas are
published online.
City of Chula Vista Page 5 Printed on 111012020
C® of Chula Vista
Meetinge Minutes -, Draft
Tuesday,June 18,2019 5:00 RM Council Chambers
276 4th Avenue, (Building A
Chula Vista, CA 91910
REGULAR MEETING of THE CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to, order at 5:04 p.m. in the
Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmember Diaz, Councilmember Galvez, Councilmember McCann, Deputy Mayor
Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas
Also Present: City Manager Halbert, City Attorney Googins, City Clerk Bigelow, and Deputy City Clerk
Turner
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
Councilmember Diaz led the Pledge of Allegiance.
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
A. 191-0313 PRESENTATION OF QUARTERLY EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
RECIPIENTS
Human Resources Director Chase recognized recipients of quarterly recognition awards.
B. 191-0282 PRESENTATION BY DEL MAR FAIRGROUND MARKETING
CONSULTANT AMY LAUFENBERG REGARDING THE 2019 SAN
DIEGO COUNTY FAIR
Item B was not heard.
CONSENT CALENDAR {(terms 1 - 8)
City Attorney Googins announced that a revised Attachment I for Item 4 had been distributed to the
Council and that action on the item would be with respect to the revised document
Mayor Casillas Salas stated she would abstain from voting on Item 5 due to a potential property-related
conflict of interest.
Items 3 and 7 were removed from the Consent Calendar by a member of the public and Councilmember
Diaz, respectively.
1 1191-0336 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of January 22, 2019.
Recommended Action: Council approve the minutes.
City of Chula Vista Page 1
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 5 of 208
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDIraft June 18,2019
2. 19-0881 RESOLUTION NO. 2919-118 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONTRACTS WITH KAR _ L SOLUTIONS
FOR SOF=TWARE, SUBSCRIPTION, AND LICENSING SERVICES
Recommended Action: Council adapt the resolution.
Item 3,was removed from the Consent Calendar.
4. 191-0279 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-115 OF THE CITY CCOUNCCIL. OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONTINUATION OF THE ELECTRICITY
COMMODITY PURCHASES FROM SHELL ENERGY AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS
IN CONJUNCTION WITH UPDATING THE PURCHASE RATES
(This item was continued from 5/21/2019.)
Recommended Action: Council adapt the resolution.
5. 191-0167 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-116 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS; AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR
THE "THIRD AVENUE STRFETBCAS"E IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
PHASE III (STI-0406)" PROJECT TO TRI-GROUP CONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPMENT, INC.) IN THE AMOUNT OF 871277680;
TRANSFERRING $110,000IN TRANSNET APPROPRIATIONS FROM
ST 0898 TO STL0406 AND APPROPRIATING $2,599,099 IN
TRANBN T SMART GROWTH INCENTIVE PROGRAM SGIP GRANT
F=UNDS 4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
8. 191-9815 RESOLUTION N NCS. 2019-117 OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA TRANSFERRING UNCLAIMED MONIES IN THE AMOUNT
OF $149 FROM THE CASH BOND DEPOSIT FUND TO THE GENERAL
FUND
Recommended Action: Council adapt the resolution.
Item 7 was removed from the Consent Calendar.
8. 191-0222 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2919-119 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY AND AZTEC
LANDSCAPING, INC. FOR OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES IN BID GROUP ' 1 ($844,584), 2 ($220,956),
8 ($474,288)3 5 ($6045596)5 8 ($1,219)1728), 7 ($434,724)j AND 19
($428,244) IN THE TECTAL AMOUNT OF $452271129
City of Chula Vista Page 2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 6 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-(Graft ,dune 18,2019
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-120 OF THE, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A LANDSCAPE.
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY AND B IGH VIE
LANDSCAPE SERVICES FOR OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES IN BID GROUPS 4 ($593,530), ($5325231)5.
AND 11 ($648,652) IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $17774941
C. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-121 OF THE CITY COUNCIL O1= THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY AND GPOCAL
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT & LANDSCAPING FOR OPEN
SPACE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES IN BID GROUP
(OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS 5, 61 9)1 1 Ca, AND 11 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$1699861
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolutions.
Approval of the Consent Calendar
ACTION: A motion was made by Councilrnemr ber McCann, seconded) by Counclilrrmember
Galvez, to approve staffs recommendations on the above Consent Calendar
items, headings read,text waived.The motion carried by the following vete:
Items 1,21 4 through 6,and 9
Yes: 5- Diaz, Galvez, McCann, Padilla and Casi las Salas
No: 0
Abstain: 0
Item 5
Yes: 4- Diaz, Galvez, McCann and Padilla
INo: 0
Abstain: 1 - Casillas Salas
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
. 19'-030 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-114 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE MASTER PLAN FOR A F=ENCED,
OFF-LEASH DOCS PARK AT ROHR PARK
Pam reel, Chula Vista resident, spore in opposition to staff's recommendation.
ACTION: A motion was made by Mayor +Casil as Salas, seconded by Councilmember
McCann, to adopt Resolution No. 2019-114, heading read, text waived. The
motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: 5- Diaz, Galvez, McCann, (Padilla and Casi las Salas
No: 0
Abstain: 0
City of Chula Vista page 3
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 7 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft June 18,2019
7. 19-0327 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-118 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CF ULA VISTA APPROVING THE AMENDED PUBLIC SAFETY
EXPENDITURE PLAN
Fire Chief C'eering responded to questions from the Council.
ACTION: A motion was made by Mayor Casilas galas, seconded by Counclmember
McCann, to adopt Resolution No. 2019-118, heading read, text waived. The
motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: 5- Diaz, Galvez, McCann, (Padilla and Casillas Salas
No: 0
Abstain: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
John Acosta, Chula Vista resident, expressed concern regarding activities in District 2 and the lacy of a
Council aide for the district.
Angelique (Williams, Chula Vista resident, commended Officer Salazar and the Chula Vista Police
Department for the response to a recent incident.
Patricia Aguilar, Chula Vista resident, expressed concern regarding ,halt Creep Golf Course and
recommended City initiate a land use change and rezoning process for the golf course.
Pam feel, Chula Vista resident, expressed concern regarding the Bonita Glen development.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item 90 was taken out of order and heard following Public Comments. Item g was heard following item 10.
10. 19-9293 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-122 OF THE CITY COUNCIL CSF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE THIRD ADDENDUM (IS-17-99915)
TO FEIR 02-914; APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY RANCH
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO REFLECT LAND USE CHANGES
FOR APPROXIMATELY 36 ACRES WITHIN THE OTAY RANCH
FREEWAY COMMERCIAL PLANNING AREA 12 PLANNED
COMMUNITY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED 'TEXT, MAC'S AND 'TABLES
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-123 OF THE CITY COUNCIL CSF THE CITY
OF CHUI A VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY
RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA
(SPA) PLAN, DESIGN PLAN, AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY
DOCUMENTS; AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY
RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL NORTH MASTER PRECISE PLAN
C. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING
AMENDMENT" TO OTAY RANCH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL.
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS FOR THE NORTHERLY FC-2 PORTION
City of Chula Vida Page 4
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDrarft June 18,2019
(FIRST READING)
D. ORDINANCE O1= THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, VILLAGE 11 TOWN CENTER, LLC AND SUNRANCH
CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC FOR THE FREEWAY COMMERCIAL
NORTH PORTION OF' OTAY RANCH PLANNING AREA 1 (FIRST
READING)
ING)
E. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-124 OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT' FOR THE PROVISION OF' COMMUNITY PURPOSE
FACILITY ACREAGE FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND OTAY PROJECT, L.P
F. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-12 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'TI-II= CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CVT 1
-0001 FOR OTAY RANCH PLANNING AREA 12 FREEWAY
COMMERCIAL- NORTH
G. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-126 OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT DR17-
01037 TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE SE PROJEC CONSISTING OF A
578-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX, 15,000 SQ UAB FEET OF RETAIL
USE, TWO INTEGRATED PARKING STRUCTURES ON TWO LOTS
CONSISTING OF 10.4 ACRES LOCATED IN THE OTAY RANCH
FREEWAY COMMERCIAL- NORTH, NEIGHBORHOOD PA-1'
Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the
date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice..
City attorney Googins provided information on the proceedings and recommended the Council disclose all
ex parte communications regarding the item. Councilmembers reported the following ex ,parte
communications-
- Mayor Casillas ,alas stated she met with Nick Lee and Maria hiller of Baldwin & Sons to discuss the
project. She also received emails about the item, including messages from Kathleen Reed and an email in
opposition to the project from Benjamin Dejo.
- Councilmember McCann stated he had several conversations with Nick Lee and spoke with Kathleen
Reed. He stated he received multiple emails in favor and opposed to the project.
- Deputy Mayor Padilla and Councilmember Diaz stated they received emails in favor and opposed to the
project.
- Councilmember Calvez reported having met with Nick Lee and Maria Miller of Baldwin and Sons to.
discuss the project, and she received a flash drive with the amendment to the project. She stated she
received written communications from the following: Richard Schulman of Hecht Solberg, representing
ilvergate; SRA, in response to Francis Offermann; YMCA and Monica Montano in support of the project;
City of Chula Vista Page
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 9 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft June 18,2019
and Kathleen Reed, Benjamin Dejo, Theresa Acerro, Peer Watry, Francis Offermann and Doug Chhermak
in opposition to the project. ,the reset and corresponded aria email with Barney and Kathleen Reed, who
Were opposed to the protect. Councilmember Galvez ,Mated she had conversations With Peter Watry and
Sharon Floyd.
Senior Planner Conn gave a presentation on the item.
Staff answered questions of the Council.
Mayor Casillas Salas opened the public hearing.
Mick Lee and Maria hiller, representing Baldwin and Sons, gave a presentation on the item.
Patricia ,Aguilar, Chula Vista resident, spore regarding pedestrians in the area of the project and in
support of continued consideration of pedestrian safety.
The following members of the public spoke in support of staff's recommendation on the item.
-Chris Redo, Chula Vista resident
-Sarah Cantu, Chula Vista small business owner
-Zaneta Encarnacion, Chula Vista resident
-Lisa Cohen, representing the Chamber of Commerce
-Carmen Richardson, Chula Vista resident
-Colin Parent, representing Circulate,San Diego
-Rick Richardson, Chula Vista resident
The following members of the public spoke in opposition to staff's recommendation on the item.'
-Douglas Chermak, representing Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility
-Joanne Springer, Chula Vista resident
-Kathleen Reed, Chula Vista resident
- Theresa Acerro, Chula Vista resident, Who also spoke on behalf of Joanna Ward
Pam Feel submitted Written documentation in opposition to the project and was not present when called to
speak.
Richard Schulman, representing the applicant,provided a rebuttal argument..
There being no further members of the public Who Wished to speak, Mayor Casillas Salas closed the
public hearing.
Principal Planner Power and Senior Planner Donn provided information in response to comments made by
speakers and staff responded to questions of the Council.
Council discussion ensued..
ACTION: A motion was made by Deputy Mayer Padilla, seconded by Counc'llmember
McGann, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2019-122 through 2019-126, and place the
ordinances (Items 10C and 10D) on first reading, headings read, text waived. The
motion carried by the following vote:
"des: 5- Diaz, Ga v+ez, McCann, (Padilla and Gasillas Salas
INo: 0
Abstain:
City of Chula Vista Page 6
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 10 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft June 18,2019
9�. 19-0283 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-127 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CF ULA VISTA CONSIDERING A LAND USE AMENDMENT AND
REZONING INITIATION RE UEST (IR19-0026), AND PROVIDING INPUT
TO STAFF REGARDING PROCESSING A GENERAL. PLAN
AMENDMENT AND REZONE FOR APPROXIMATELY 9-ACRES
LOCATED WEST OF 1- AND EAST AND SOUTH OF THE MAIN
OFFICE AND DISTRIBUTION BUILDINGS ON TIME COLLINS
AEROSPACE/UNITED TECHNOLOGY COMPANY CAMPUS
Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the
date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice..
City Manager Halbert introduced the item and announced that a revised resolution had been distributed to
the Council.
Economic Development Director Crockett and,Associate Planner Phelps gage a presentation on the item.
Mayor Casillas Salas opened the public hearing.
The following members of the public spoke in support of staff's recommendation of the item-
- Kyle Strong, representing Collins,aerospace and General Counsel for Rohr, Inc.
-Emil wohl, representing Penwood Wohl Property Croup
-Peter watry, Chula Vista resident
-Patricia,Aguilar, Chula Vista resident
There being no further members of the public who wished to speak, Mayor Casillas Salas closed the
public hearing.
Council discussion ensued.
ACTION: A motion was made by Councilmember Galvez, seconded by Councilmember
McCann, to adopt Resolution No. 2019-127, as revised, and to authorize the City
Attorney to make further revisions to the resolution to add reference to the
Regional Technology Park in the whereas clause and to make other minor
conforming changes necessary to bring the resolution into consistency with
Council's intentions. The heading was read, text waived. The motion carried by
the following vote:
"Yes: 5- Diaz, Galvez, McCann, IPadilla and Casillas Salas
No: 0
Abstain: 0
Mayor Casillas Salas recessed the meeting at 8:10p.m. The Council reconvened at 8.45 p.m., with all
members present.
ACTION ITEMS
111. 19-0303 RESOLUTION NO 2919-1 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CF ULA VISTA APPROVING A REQUEST BY THE CITY'S FRANCHISED
WASTE, COLLECTION SERVICES ES PROVI ER, REPUBLIC SERVICES,
ES,
TO INCREASE SERVICE FEES FOR SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING
SERVICES, BASED ON EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES
City of Chula Vida Page 7
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 11 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft ,dune 18,2019
Environmental Services Manager Medrano gave a presentation on the item..
Michael Simonsen, Richard Brunson, and Marek Crabbs, representing Republic Services, gage a
presentation on the item.
City and Republic Services staff answered questions of the Council.
ACTION: A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Councilmember
Galvez, to adopt (Resolution No. 2019-128, heading read, text waived. The motion
carried by the following vote:
Yes: 5- Diaz, Galvez, McCann, (Padilla and Casillas Salas
INo: 0
Abstain:
12. 191-0276 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-129 F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AMENDED AND, RESTATED JOINT
EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AND THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT FOR
THE CHULA 'VISTA BAYFRONT FACILITIES FINANCINGAUTHORITY;
CONSENTING, TO THE APPOINTMENT OF THE CITY ATTORNEY TO
SERVE AS CO-COUNSEL TO SUCH AUTHORITY"; AND APPOINTING INTING A
COUNCILMEMBER TO ITS GOVERNING BOARD
City Manager!Talbert spoke regarding the item.
ACTION: A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Councilmember
McCann, to adopt (Resolution No. 20,19-129, and to consent to the appointment of
the City Attorney as co-counsel and to appoint Deputy Mayor Padilla to serve on
the governing board of the Chula Vista Bayfront Facilities Financing Authority.
'The heading was read,text waived.'The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: 5- Diaz, Galvez, McCann, (Padilla and Casillas Salas
INo:
Abstain: 0
CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
There were none.
MAYOR'S REPORTS
Mayor Casillas galas reported having participated in a military care package drive at Live Home San
Diego. She expressed gratitude to Deputy Mayor Padilla for the invitation to Equality ,Awards gala. Mayor
Casillas Salas announced that the Council Chambers would undergo upgrades and that the following two
meetings would be held in the Civic Center Library,Auditorium.
CCUNCILMMERS" CCMMN 'S
Councilmember McCann expressed gratitude to the Council for approving the dog park at Rohr Park. He
spoke regarding Flag Day and the proper disposal of flags, and extended Father's Day greetings.
Deputy Mayor Padilla extended Father's Day greetings.
City of Chula Vista Page g
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 12 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDrarft June 18,2019
ouncilmember Diaz expressed his regret for his inability to attend a recent meeting at the Port District.
ouncilmember Galvez reported on the following events: Jazz on Third fundraiser that benefitted Love Thy
Neighbor, Dia De San Juan ,balsa Festival, and end-of-year presentations by High Tech High School
interns. She thanked current and former Councilmembers and staff for their work on the Bayfront project.
CITY ATTORNEYS RE PORTS
There were none.
CLOSED D s ssION
City Attorney Goog ns announced that the Council would convene in closed session to discuss the items
listed below.
Mayor Casillas Salas recessed the meeting at 8:5p.m. The Council reconvened in dosed Session at
9:00 p.m., with all members present.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 13706 and Council Policy No. 345-03, Official Minutes and records of
action taken during Closed sessions are maintained by the City Attorney.
113. 19-0322 CONFERENCE 'U11'ITH LEGAL. COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54950.9(d)(4):
Three [3,] Cases.
ACTION: No reportable action.
114. 191-0332 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54950.9
(d)(1)
Name of case: City of Chula Vista v. Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc., et al., San
Diego superior Court, Case No. 37-2016-00045312-CU-CD-CTL
ACTION: No reportable action.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk
Minutes prepared by: Tyshar L. Turner, Deputy City Clerk
City of Chula Vista page 9
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 13 of 20
C® of Chula Vista
Meetinge Minutes -, Draft
Tuesday,July 9,2019 5:00 RM Chula Vista Public Library
Civic Center(Branch
365 F Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Room: Library Auditorium
REGULAR MEETING CSF THE CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to, order at 5:00 p.m. in the
Library Auditorium located in the Chula Vista Public Library, Civic Center Branch, 3,58 F Street, Chula
Vista, California.
ROLL CALL:
P,resento. Councilmember Diaz, Councilmember Gialvez, Councilmember McCann and Mayor
Casillas 'alas
Excused-. Delputy Mayor Padilla
Also Present: City Manager Halbert, City Attorney Googins, City Clerk Bigelow, and Assistant City Clerk
Turner
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
Councilmember Diaz led the Pledge of Allegiance.
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
A. 191-0340 PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION TO JEANI JAMES IN
RECOGNITION OF HER RETIREMENT AND 34 YEARS OF SERVICE
WITH THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Mayor Casillas Salas read the proclamation and Councilmember McCann presented it to Jeani James.
B. 191-0328 PRESENTATION OF AN UPDATE ON THE LIVING COAST DISCOVERY
CENTER BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BE,N VALLEJOS
Ben Vallejos, Living Coast Discovery Center Executive Director, gave a presentation on the item.
CONSENT CALENDAR ((terms 11 - 5)
Mayor Casillas Salas stated that Councilmember McCann would abstain from voting on Item 5B due to a
potential property-related conflict of interest.
1. 191-0351 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of February 5 and 7, 2019.
Recommended Action-. Council approve the minutes.
City of Chula Vista Page 1
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 14 of 208
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. July g,2019
2. 19-9231 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2919-139 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2919129 COIF
BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $499,999 FROM UNANTICIPATED
REVENUE FROM LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE CVEATC PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE REPAIR PROJECT GGV9241 AND APPROPRIATING $49,999
FROM THE CHULA VISTA ELITE ATHLETE TRAINING CENTER FUN
TO GGV9241 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2919-131 O1= THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA 'VISTA APPROVING THE F=IRST AMENDMENT TO THE
EXISTING CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY O1= CHULA VISTA AND KIMLFY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,1 ASSOCIATES, INC.
INCREASING THE ANNUAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT O $759,999,
FOR THE TERM ENDING, OCTOBER 3 , 2919
Recommended Action: Council adept the resolutions.
3. 191-9321 RESOLUTION NO. 2919-132 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE. FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT WITH MCFAR ANL PROMOTIONS, INC. TO PROVIDE
EVENT PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE 29191 AND, 29291 SO THBAY
EARTH DAY, HARBORF BST, AND THE STARLIGHT PARADE
CHILDREN'S FAIRE
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
4. 191-9292 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2919-133 OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN ON
APRIL 9 AND 19, 2919, REGARDING AN ORDINANCE ADDING
CHAPTERS 3.99 AND 3.91 TO THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS GENERALLY AND,
THE BAYFRONT PROJECT SPECIAL TAX FINANCING DISTRICT
B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHAPTERS
3.99 AND 3.91 TO THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL. CGDE RELATING TO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS GENERALLY AND THE
BAYFRONT PROJECT SPECIAL TAX FINANCING DISTRICT (FIRST
..FADING)
Recommended Action: Council adapt the resolution and place the ordinance on
first reading.
City of Chula Vida Page 2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 15 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. July g,2019
5. 1 9 0260 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-134 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES TO BE COLLECTED T
PAY THE, COSTS OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES FOR COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICTS 97-1, 9�7T 97-3, 98-1, 98-2, 98-3, 99-1 99-2,
2999-1, 2991-11 2001-27 07-17 08-1) 08-M7 99-M7 11-M, 12-1) 12-M) 13-1, 13
_M, 14-M7 14-M21 15-1, 17-11 18-M AND 19-M WITHIN H E CITY OF
CCHULA VISTA AND DESIGNATING THE DIRECTOR OF
FINANCE/TREASURER TO F=ILE A LIST OF TAXES TO BE LEVIED ON
EACH PARCEL WITH THE COUNTY AUDITOR EACH YEAR
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-135 OFT E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CCHUL.A VISTA LEVYING SPECCIAL. TAXES TO BE COLLECTED TO
PAY THE COSTS OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES FOR COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICTS 95-1 AND 97-M, WITHIN THE CITY OF CCHU!LA
VISTA AND DESIGNATING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER
TO FILE A LIST OF TAXES TO BE LEVIED ON EACH PARCEL WITH
THE COUNTY AUDITOR EACH YEAR
Recommended Action: Council adapt the resolutions.
Approval of the Consent Calender
ACTION: A motion was made by Councilmember McCann, seconded by Councilmember
Diaz, to approve staff s recommendations on the above Consent Calendar items,
headings read,text waived.The motion carried by the followings vote:
Yes: 4- Diaz, Galvez, McCann and Caslillas Salas
No: 0
Abstain: 0
Item 513
Yes: 3- Diaz, Galvez and CCasilllas Sala
INo: 0
Abstain: 1 - McCann
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
There were none.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jose Viesca, Chula Vista resident, spoke in support of public transit use and distributed written
communications.
The following members of the public spoke in support of Council acceptance of the feasibility study on
Community Choice Energy.
-Carolyn Scofield, Chula 'Vista resident
-Gina Woodard, Chula Vista resident
-Rita Clement, Chula Vista resident
-Jim Scofield, Chula Vista resident
City of Chula Vida page 3
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 16 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. July g,2019
-tarry Emerson, National City resident, and he also spoke regarding a Caltrans electric vehicle project
Grace Papp spoke regarding emotional and mental health concerns related to vaping and marijuana use.
Andrea Murphy, Chula Vista resident, expressed concern regarding activities in the park area of Colorado
Streets and spoke in support of additional lighting and police patrol in the area.
Becky Papp expressed concern regarding commercial marijuana activities.
Scott waddle, Chula Vista resident, representing the Youth Sports Council, spoke regarding a sprinkler
replacement project at lontevalle Park.
ACTION ITEMS
6. 1 9�-0304 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING A CONSULTANT' SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
DELGRENZG INTERNATIONAL INC. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
SCOPE OF WORK FOR A CITYWIDE SMART I RIGATION SYSTEM
Item 6 was not heard and was continued.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
City Manager Halbert stated a memo was distributed to Council regarding the Parkland Acquisition and
Development (PAD) fees for western Chula Vista, and that he anticipated bringing an item regarding
accessory dwelling units to Council the following month.
MAYOR'S REPORTS
7. 1191-0334 Consideration of appointment of a voting delegate and alternates for the
2019 League of California. Cities Annual Conference, to be held in Lang
Beach, October 1 1 .
ACTION: A motion was made by Councilrnember McCann, seconded by Counclilrnernber
Diaz, to appoint Councillmember McCann as the voting delegate and
Council ember Diaz as the alternate for the 2019 League of California Cities
Annual Conference.The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: 4- Diaz, Galvez, McCanln and Casillas Salas
INo: 0
Abstain: 0
City of Chula Vista Page 4
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 17 of 20
City Council Meeting Minutes-IDraft. July g,2019
8. 1g'-0354 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT'S OF THE FOLLOWING:
eEllen eu�gh, Sustainability Commission
Christos Koirgen, sustainability Commission
ACTION: A motion was made by Councilmember MlcCann, seconded by Councilmember
Galvez, to ratify the above appointments. The motion carried by the following
vote:
Yes: 4- Diaz, Galvez, McCann and Casillas Salas
Nth: 0
Abstain: 0
Mayor Casillas Salas reported on her attendance at the following events: Community Health Croup
presentation, MTS Elevate San Diego 2020 community forum, Chula Vista Rotary installation, South
County Economic Development Council annual meeting, and a,Sustainability Commission meeting.
COU COMMENTS
Councilmember Galvez thanked staff for the preparation necessary to hold the meeting at the library. She
commented on the success of the 4th Fest.
Councilmember Diaz spoke in support SB438, prohibiting government agencies from contracting out 011
services to private organizations. Mayor Casillas Salus stated a letter of support would be submitted.
Councilmember McCann reported on the following recent events: South County Economic Development
Council annual meeting, the opening of Eastlake Modern Dentistry, and the 4th Fest. He recognized the
Police department and volunteers for their work on the 4th lest and spoke regarding the coastal permit
for the Bayfront project.
CITY ATTORNEYS REPORTS
City Attorney Coogins provided an update on the neighborhood protection unit.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 5:58 8 p.m.
Kerry K. Bigelow,i MMC, City Clear
Minutes prepared b : Tyshar L. Turner, Assistant City Clerk
City of Chula Vista Page
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 18 of 20
zmr,
..'
l
IN III til
v r
:a C1TY' C,0UNC'1LSTIA, ""EMENT
CITY, OF
CHUIAVISTA
r
l 1
January 14,202 0 File ID: 19-0513
,TITS
A. RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGNATING ANIS SETTING ASIDE
CERTAIN CITY-OWNED DEAL PROPERTY CURRENTLY KNOWN AS D STREET, WEST OF' WOOIDLAWN
,A VENUE, FOR PARK ANIS RECREATIONAL PURPOSES
B. RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE DARK MASTER
PLAN FOR U STREET PARK LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF U STREET, WEST of WOODwLAWN
AVENUE,ANIS THE NATE WESTVIEW PARK
RECOMMENDED171
Council adopt the resolutions.
SUMMARY
This report presents the designation and set-aside for parkland purposes of an approximately 0.81-acre site
located within the D Street right-of-way,west of Woodla n Avenue,the draft Parr Master,Plan and name for
the public park.(the `Project") to be located within said site (Attachment 1., Project Location).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Element of the City's General Plan.includes Policy E 6.1.01 which reads,
The siting of new sensitive receivers within 500 feet of highways resulting from development or
redevelopment projects shall require the preparation ofa health risk assessment as part of the CEQA
review of the Project.Attendant health risks identified in the Health Risk Assessment(HRA) shall be
feasibly mitigated to the maximum extent practicable, in accordance with CEQA, in order to help
ensure that applicable federal and state standards are not exceeded.
Air Quality Analysis
The western portion of the D Street Park site lies within. 500' of Interstate 5 (I-5). Therefore,an Air Quality
Analysis prepared by RECON Environmental (Attachment 2-1)was completed to evaluate potential local and
regional air quality impacts of locating an urban parr near a highway. The Analysis concluded that based on
an annual ground level concentration of'o.04[tg/m3,the chronic non-cancer risk predicted at the project site
1 . 0 0 1 P IiI 1
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 19 of 20
was 0.008. This is below the level of 1.0 at which adverse non-cancer health risks would be anticipated.
Additionally, air emissions associated with project construction and operation would not exceed the
applicable City significance thresholds.These thresholds are designed to provide limits below which project
emissions would not significantly change regional air quality. The Air Quality Analysis findings were based
on a park design that excludes any active recreation within the 500'closest to 1-5.Active recreation as defined
in the Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Master Plan are moderate to high intensity-level activities usually
including the use of playgrounds, ball fields, sport courts, and recreation centers. These activities typically
include increased physical exertion typical of organized sports or tot-lot playground activity. 'The Analysis
also assumed the maximum exposed individual receptor to be present 4 hours per day for 250 days per year.
A community garden was later added as a park component in the western portion of the project site near I-
5. The Air Quality Analysis was amended (.Attachment 2-2) to analyze the potential cancer risk from diesel-
exhaust particulate matter (DPM) due to the closer proximity of people using the garden to 1-5 than
previously assessed and the potential for additional cancer risks from ingestion of DPM due to crops grown
within the community garden.The proposed community garden is located between 20 and 90 feet from the
western property line.This would result in exposures to ground-level concentrations of DPM between 0.06
and 0.05 [.g/m3. This is still below the level of 1.0 at which adverse non-cancer health risks would be
anticipated.Regarding ingestion of DPM,only a small subset of toxic substances is subject to deposition onto
soil,plants,and water bodies..According to the 2015 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for the
Preparation of Risk Assessments, issued by the Office of'Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, DPM is
not considered a multi-pathway substance. Therefore, cancer risk associated with DPM is limited to
inhalation pathways and no additional cancer risk would be associated with ingestion of DPM.In conclusion,
locating a community garden near 1-5 would not result in significant DPM cancer risks.
Please note,the Air Quality Analysis focuses on the western portion of the D Street Park site which lies within
500' of Interstate 5 and the potential health risks from the site's location adjacent to this freeway.
Subsequent to the completion of the Air Quality Analysis Amendment in March 2018,the eastern portion of
the Park Master Plan (outside of the 500' buffer from 1-5) was updated to remove parking and replace with
additional park space including a tot lot. Changes to the eastern portion of'the Park Master Plan, outside of
the 500' buffer from 1-5, does not change the conclusions of the Air Quality Analysis or the Amendment to
the Analysis.
Noise/' and Use Compatibility
The Environmental Element of the City's General Plan contains applicable noise/land use compatibility
guidelines. The General Plan lists that neighborhood parks, specifically, are considered compatible when
located in areas where exterior noise levels are 65 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) or less.
Neighborhood Parks,as defined by the City's Park Master Plan, range in size from 5 to 15 acres and include
open play space,playing fields,play equipment and picnic areas.D Street Park is classified as an Urban Park.
As defined by the City's Park Master Plan, Urban Parks are generally located in urban downtown areas, are
typically 20,000 square feet to four acres in size,and may contain facilities such as public plazas,tot lots,play
structures, public art features,, sports courts (such as basketball or tennis),walking/jogging trails, dog walk
areas, picnic or seating areas, some grass play area, trees, and other plant materials. Demands for parks
P 12
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 20 of 208
within urban areas are different in that the urban environment contains more residential density. Urban
parks will occur west of Interstate 805 where infill and redevelopment activity are anticipated and where
available and affordable land is scarce. The noise/land use compatibility guidelines listed in the City's
General Plan pertaining to Neighborhood Parks do not apply to this Project.
Parking
A parking count for the Project area was done in April 2018 and a recent update completed in September -
October 2019 which covered the streets south of C Street,west of Broadway, north of E Street and east of I-
5 (Attachment 3).
The parking count shows that there were 620 legal parking spaces in April 2018 and 628 legal parking spaces
in September-October 2019 which includes the parking spaces on D Street west of Woodlawn Avenue(refer
to Vehicular Access and Parking section on page 6 of this report for additional information). The range of
available parking used in the neighborhood was not at 100%occupancy and there were generally 9%- 36%
parking availability in the neighborhood. If the existing parking spaces west of' Woodlawn Avenue are
eliminated, it would leave 592 on-street parking spaces which would represent a 4% - 23%, parking
availability in the neighborhood.
Water Quality
The proposed Project will convert existing asphalt into a park which would reduce the amount of existing
impervious areas by replacing them with pervious areas, such as turf for open play, planting areas,
decomposed granite paths, and a community garden. Stormwater will be treated on-site through
biofiltration and/or vegetated swales. A Stormwater Quality Report will be required for approval prior to
construction of the Project. Water quality would be improved over existing conditions.
Environmental Determination
Considering the conclusions from the Air Quality Analysis, Parking Study and Water Quality Analysis, and
because, the noise/land use compatibility guidelines listed in the City's General Plan pertaining to
Neighborhood Parks does not apply to Urban Parks, the Director of Development Services has determined
that the Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15332 [In.-fill Development
Projects] and Section 15304, [Minor Alterations to Land] of the State California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines (Attachment 4).Thus,no further environmental review is required.
BOARD/COMMII'TTEE RECOMMENI)XrION
Staff presented the project to the Parks and Recreation Commission on October 10, 2019. The Commission
voted unanimously to approve the project as presented.
DISCUSSION
The City continues to progress toward increasing park acreage inventory in western Chula Vista. While
future residential growth will result in the demand for additional parklands and recreational facilities,there
P 13
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 21 of 208
will be increased challenges in securing appropriate park and recreation sites in western Chula Vista,where
land is primarily built out. The current design and development of the D Street Park takes advantage of the
opportunity to expand the public realm by transforming the west end of D Street at Woodlawn Avenue into
an urban park.
The approximately 0.81-acre site is in western Chula Vista and occurs within the existing 80-foot wide D
Street right-of-way between Woodlawn Avenue,to the east and the MTS Blue Line Rail corridor to the west.
To the north of the site is the Vista Mar development (701 D Street) consisting of 87 townhomes completed
in 2018,and to the south of the site is the existing Bayscene Mobilehome Park community.Staff has identified
this portion of D Street to be an underutilized existing right-of-way ght-of-way space suitable for an urban park.
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting-February 22, 2018
On February 22, 2018, staff presented a draft Park Master Plan to the Parks and Recreation Commission
which included a 0.54-,acre public park space and 0.27-acre area with 30 public parking stalls. During that
meeting,the Commission noted a desire to increase the amount of parkland by reducing the public parking
area. In addition, the Commission expressed a concern regarding the amount of parking that would be
exclusively available to those individuals visiting the park.The Commission also noted concerns regarding a
solid concrete masonry wall proposed along the park's western property line because it would block views
to the west and would become a target for graffiti and vandalism and asked staff to review additional material
options or wall alternatives that would better preserve the view.,The Commission also asked staff to consider
raising the gazebo or picnic area to assure a clear view to the west and requested that trees be added to frame
the view,.'The Commission voted unanimously to continue consideration of the item (.Attachment 5,Meeting
Minutes)
Staff has since revised the draft Park Master Plan per the comments and concerns raised during that Parks
and Recreation Commission meeting to exclude the public parking area and to provide O�.8 1-acres of public
park space. Other revisions include a 6' tall metal picket fence in lieu of the previously proposed concrete
wall. The proposed metal picket fence would not be subject to graffiti and would fully maintain the park's
western view. City Staff has also determined that raising the picnic area is cost prohibitive and poses
Americans with Disability Act (ATEA) accessibility issues. City staff has determined the 6' tall metal picket
fence in lieu of the concrete wall is sufficient to maintain the western view without raising the picnic area.
Lastly, the draft Park Master Plan has been updated to include a community garden at the park's western
end.'The community garden was added to engage a community-based organization or local school within the
park space. Through a participating agreement with the City, a community-based organization or school
could use the community garden to teach students, and others about organic gardening. Additionally, the
community garden and its participants would help activate the park space throughout the day.
Community Outreach
In March of 2017, City staff held a public community meeting to discuss possible alternative uses for the
portion of D Street west of Woodlawn Avenue. In the announcement for the community meeting, staff also
P 14
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 22 of 208
provided a questionnaire asking residents if they prefer the site be utilized as a public parking area, public
park,or a combination of public parking area and public park. Comments provided by the public during the
March 2017 community meeting and via the questionnaire noted the public's desire to see a combination of
public park and public parking area at this portion of D Street.The public acknowledged a need for additional
public parks in western Chula Vista,but the loss of on-street parking was concerning.
In October of 2017, City staff held a second public community meeting to present a preliminary draft Park
Master Plan for this site. During this meeting, staff noted the preliminary draft Park Master Plan had been
designed to include a public parking area, a children's play element located outside of the Health Risk
Assessment Zone,and a passive recreation lawn area.Several members of the public who were in attendance
expressed concerns about safety within the park space and the park's tendency to attract homeless
individuals. City staff noted the park's preliminary design had been drafted with consultation from the Chula
Vista Police Department to assure the proposed park and parking area could be safely and efficiently
patrolled by police.
On April 18, 2018, City staff held a third public community meeting to present updates to the draft Park
Master Plan and provided a summary of the comments and concerns raised during the February 22, 2018
Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. Staff also presented three additional draft Park Master Plan
options for public input: (a) A proposed park space and parking area with 3,0 parking stalls; (b) a proposed
park space and parking area with 18,parking stalls,and (c) a proposed park space that excluded the parking
area altogether. City staff also presented the findings of the parking study completed in April 2018.
Concluding staff's presentation,,the public voted in favor of the draft park master plan option that excluded
the parking area altogether.
Draft Park Master Plan Design Concept
The draft Park Master Plan (Attachment 6) has been designed to enhance an existing urban condition by
offering a pleasing and communal place for nearby residents. The park is designed as an open and visible
park space that takes advantage of its prominent views to the west of the Bayfront and estuary preserve
lands. Likewise,the park is designed to facilitate,law enforcement monitoring by providing site lighting and
by reducing potential hiding spaces.
The draft Park Master Plan includes the following elements:
Picnic/BBQ Area
Shade Structure
Game Tables
Bounce House Set Up Area
Open Lawn Area
Decomposed Granite Perimeter Pathway
Tot lot with swings and 2 play structures
Community Garden with 12 garden plots
Fixed Park Benches with Center Arm Rests
P 5
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 23 of 208
0 Precast Planter Pots with Accent Planting
0 Bike Racks
0 Pet Waste Station
0 Pedestrian Scale Pole Lights
The park design also maintains a 12'wide asphalt maintenance path and two 2,5'x 35'maintenance pad areas
to facilitate on-going maintenance by San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) of transmission line 642 located
along the north side of the D Street right-of-way line. Additionally, the 12' wide asphalt maintenance path
will be painted with a new asphalt seal coat to allow for possible future public art projects to occur along the
maintenance path.
The standard Park and Facilities Rules, as stated in Chapter 2.66 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC)
shall apply. SDG&E has also requested that no balloons and flying of kites be allowed in the park. 'These
additional restrictions are needed to protect the adjacent overhead power lines and associated electrical
transformers. Staff is currently reviewing the implementation of this request.
Vehicular Access and Parki'ng
The portion of D Street west of Woodlawn Avenue is not a through street and does not serve any vehicular
ingress or egress to the adjacent existing communities.Additionally,the City does not have any plans fort is
portion of D Street to provide future vehicular or pedestrian access over the trolley or Interstate 5 corridors.
Vehicular access to Interstate 5 currently occurs at E Street. Vehicular and pedestrian access to the Bayfront
currently occurs at both E Street and F Street.
Prior to the construction activity commencing at the adjacent Vista Mar site.,D Street provided approximately
36 unstriped,parallel on-street parking spaces.During the construction of the Vista Mar project,the site was
temporarily striped to include 28 perpendicular parking stalls to accommodate the parked vehicles servicing
the Vista Mar construction site. Upon completion of the Vista Mar construction,striping of the parking stalls
was restored back to 36 parallel parking spaces.
As stated previously, a parking count for the project area was done in April 2018 and a recent update was
completed in September-October 2019,which covered the streets south of C Street,west of Broadway,north
of E Street and east of 1-5 (Attachment 3)1.The parking count shows that there were 620 legal parking spaces
in April 2018, increasing to 628 legal parking spaces in September - October 2,019, including the parking
spaces on D Street west of Woodlawn Avenue. During the study periods, available on-street parking in the
neighborhood never achieved 100% occupancy, with between 9% and 36% of' the legal neighborhood
parking spaces unoccupied at any given time. If the existing parking spaces west of Woodlawn Avenue are
eliminated,it would leave 592 on-street neighborhood parking spaces. Assuming similar demand,between
4%and 23% of the on-street neighborhood parking spaces would remain unoccupied.
P �3ge 6
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 24 of 208
Park Name
City staff has selected Westview Park as the potential park name.The name Westview Park is descriptive of
the park site's expansive western view shed. The name draws a connection to the Western Chula Vista
waterfront and the site's relationship to the western horizon.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT'
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings
within 1,000 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action.Consequently,this item
does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of
Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(7) or (8), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code
§87100.et sea.).
Staff is not independently aware and has not been informed by any City Council members, of any other fact
that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter.
CURREN'T-YEAR FISCAL IMPACI 11
There is no current year fiscal impact to the City.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated budget for the development of the park is $1.8 million.Construction of the park is anticipated
to be funded through a combination of Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAIS) fees collected in
Western Chula Vista and grant funds. The City continues to pursue grants to develop this park and as soon
as funding is obtained it is anticipated that construction of the park would start shortly thereafter.
Following construction,the City will be responsible for the annual ongoing maintenance of the park.
Al"TACHMENTS
1. Project Location
2. Air Quality Analysis prepared by RECON dated 08/18,/2017,amended 3/23/18,
3. Parking Count dated 10/3/19
4. Notice of Exemption,
5. Parks and Recreation Commission 10/10/19 meeting minutes
6. Draft Park Master Plan
Staff Contact: Patricia Ferman,Principal Landscape Architect, Development Services Department
P 7
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 25 of 208
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIME CITY OF
CI-ULA VISTA DESIGNATING AND SETTING ASIDE
CERTAIN AIN CITY-O vNED REAL PROPERTY CURRENTLY
KNOWN AS D STREET WEST OF WOODLAWN AVENUE
FOR PARK AND RECREATIONAL ATIONAL,PURPOS S
WHEREAS, the City of Chula vista is the owner of that certain real property situated in
the City of Chula vista, County of San Diego, State of California, currently known as D Street
west of Woodlawn Avenue which was dedicatedtot e City of Chula Vista for public use on Map
505 recorded March 13, 1888; and
WHEREAS, a portion of said D Street is no longer needed for use as a public street, as
more particularly described in a legal description thereof, marked Exhibit"A," and as shorn on a
sketch thereof,narked Exhibit"B,"both attached hereto and.incorporated herein by this reference,
and
WHEREAS, access to San Diego Cas & Electric (SDG&E) transmission line 642 located
along the north side of the D Street right-of-way line shall be maintained, and
WHEREAS, the public need and convenience require that certain public park and
recreation improvements and appurtenant works be constructed and placed through, in, on, across,
over, under, and above said portion of the above described real property for the construction of
Street Park as shown on the approved plans thereof, and
WHEREAS,the City Council desires to designate and set aside said real property described
in said Exhibit ".A" for Park and Recreational Purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED D by the City Council of the City of Chula Nista,
that it hereby designates and sets aside for Park and Recreational Purposes the real property
described in said Exhibit"A."'
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula vista that:
SECTION 1. Said designation is to continue in full ford and effect so long as said property
is used for the above stated purposes and uses or until such time that said land has been lawfully
vacated, abandoned, or disposed of by the duly constituted public authorities, at which. time said
property shall revert to the person, persons, or entity entitled thereto.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded
in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Diego evidencing this action.
SECTION 3. Said designation and set aside shall be effective upon the filing of said
certified copy in the Official Records of San.Diego County.
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 26 of 20
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this
day of 12020.
Presented by: Approved as to form by:
Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Goggins
Director of Development Services City Attorney
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 27 of 208
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'
CHULA VISTA APPROVING TME PARK MASTER PLAN FOR
D STREET PARK LOCATED ON A PORTION OF D STREET,
WEST OF WOOSLA WN AVENUE, AND THE NAME
WESTVIEW PARK
WHEREAS, the proposed 0.81-acre park site is located within the D Street right-of-way
west of Woodlawn Avenue in western Chula Vista-, and
WHEREASI the City of Chula Vista is the owner of that certain real property situated in
the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California,, currently known as D Street
Wiest of Woodlawn Avenue which was dedicated tothe City of Chula Vista for public use on Map
505 recorded March 1.3, 1888; and
WHEREAS, a portion of said D Street is no longer needed for use as, a public street, as
more particularly described in a legal description thereof, marked Exhibit"A," and as shown on a
sketch thereof,marked Exhibit"B,"both attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference;
and
WHEREASI access to San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) transmission line 642 located
along the north side of the D Street right-of-way line shall be maintained; and
WHEREAS, the western portion of said Exhibit "A" includes a Health Risk Assessment
Zone, as defined by the Environmental Element of the City of Chula Vista's General Plan, and
therefore required the completion of a Health Risk Assessment Study; and
WHEREAS,the Air Quality Analysis included in the Health Risk Assessment Study noted
no significant findings; and
WHEREAS, the Noise/Land Use compatibility guidelines listed in the City's General Plan
pertaining to Neighborhood Parks does not apply to this Project because it is designated as an
Urban Park in accordance with the Chula Vista Park Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, a parking count for the project area was done in April 2018 and an update
completed in September - October 2019 which covered the streets south of C Street, west of
Broadway,north of E Street and east of 1-5. The parking count shows that there was generally 9%
- 36% parking availability in the neighborhood and that if the existing parking spaces west of
Woodlawn Avenue are eliminated, it would represent a 4% - 23% parking availability in the
neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, the project proposes to convert existing asphalt into a park which would
reduce the amount of existing impervious areas by replacing them with pervious areas thus
improving water quality over existing conditions; and
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 28 of 208
WHEREAS,considering the conclusions from the Air Quality Analysis,Parking Study and
Watera it Analysis, an because the yNoise/Land Use compatibility guidelines listed In the
City's General Man pertaining to Neighborhood Parks does not apply to Urban Pars,the Director
of Development Services has determined that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption
pursuant to Section 15332 [In-fill Development Projects] and.Section 15304 [Minor Alterations to
Land] of the State California Environmental Quality Act CIA Guidelines. Thus, no further
environmental review is required; and
WHEREAS, standard Park and Facilities Rules, as stated in Chapter 2.66 of Chula Vista
Municipal Code (CVMC), shall apply with an additional restriction that no balloons and flying of
bites be allowed in the park in order to protect the adjacent overhead power lines andd associated
electrical transformers, and
WHEREAS,the D Street Park Master Plan provides amenities consistent with urban parks
of a similar size and configuration within western. Chula Vista neighborhoods; and.
WHEREAS, the proposed park's name is Westview Park; and
WHEREAS,the Parks and.Recreation Commission recommended approval of the D Street
Park Master Plan and parr name at its meeting on October 1011, 2019.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
that it approves the Park Master Plan for D Street Park, located within a portion of D Street, west
of Woodlawn.Avenue, and the name Westview Park,
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this
day of , 202o
Presented by: .Approved as to fora by.-
Kelly
;Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins
Director of Development Services City Attorney
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 29 of 20
EXHIBIT "'A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Tir-IATPORTION OF"D"STREET, 80.00 FEET WIDE JN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY
O
F
STATE OFCALIFORNIA, LYING WESTERLY OF THE WESTERLY RIGHT-
SAN DIEG�0,
OF-"VVAY LI NE OF'WOODLAWN AVEN UE F 60,00 FEET WI DE, AND LYI NG EASTERLY OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEG
IERLY TERMMUS OF' "THAT C,ERTAIIN COURSE HAVING A INNING AT' THE SOUTHI
DtS'TANCEAND BEARING OF NORTH 17"4238"WEST 643.87 FEET, AS HOWN ON SHEET
20F RECORD OF" SURVEYMAP NO, 15763, FILED MARCH � , 19981, IN THE OFFICE OFTIE
COUIIT YRECORDER OFSAID COUNTY AS FILE NO. 1998-0152583', THENCE ALONG SAID
COURSE NORT Hi 17042,'38"' WEST 643.87 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A N,ON-TAIL G,E,N-r
CURVE CONCAVE, EASTERLY, Hl'AVlN'G A RADILISOF 2814.82 FEET,, A RADIAL TO WHICH
BEARS SOUTH 83"14'02"WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE
A DISTANCE OF' 19,44, FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL, ANGLE OF 00021314551 TO THE
CENTERLINE OF SAID "D'" STREET- THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE A,DISTANCE OF 38.50 FEETTHROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'47101"- THENCE
NORT'H 05"35'12" WEST .1 0 FEETTO THE PO,INT OF TERMINUS OF' THE LINE BEING
DESC,RIBED H"EREIN.
I MORE OR LESS.
CONTAINING 0,81 AC.l
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT"B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BYREFERENCE MADE A PART
HN N L)
IEIREOF.,
rn
mx
llft..A
T
................
L 8,8 1 4
GREGORY FIERCH, Pl,S. 8814, DATE T
page I of"1
FILE NO., PR-325
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 30 of 208
SHEET 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT "B"
I �0 80 160
Fe m
e
SCALE.- 1 8'0'
C)
_ 13
PA R CEL PAI
W'LYLINE WOODLAWN, A VI:NUE
cr
F'T'� V/
V 4
01 rra '57
El Y L INE R.0.,!.3. 7,� 63 j
I U
1, 0
Pu 6")
I I
V/
30
1/ 1,6 61'V
Ifl
IL
L j/
lC2
VV
„.. �r
(SI 8_3 14 102 YJ,Kl( No. 0 C7
__
A.,p
C U r"",v e 7`0 b e
ry
.......... .....................................................................................
Icy) Cu r ve Len 9 th Radius Dei"'
t 0
C2 (38.50 (2814.82) 0'4 7'0 1
............
n-
„ ««
S4)
LEGEND
E,
0
15WIPTON ARIE"A
L EGA L DE,..D(" . C)
`Y -`I. MORE O/Y
(0.8 1 A 0: 0
EXIS T'ING L.0 7" L INE'v RIGH F—OF--WA Y L IN No,,L 8814
EXI S RN G STREE r' CEW TE RL INL-.
AV
RECORO D A TA Pf_,,R R,0, 1576 J
..........................................................
0"
fA CITY OF CHU LAVIS FA
IRI N G&CAP I TAL F1 R 0J EC 1-S D E-P F
ENGINEE:
...............
ERCHI
"Y
)1910
C14 U L A V 1, TA,CA
aw1of (619)4 09-19 7 4 GRE ORY R I S. B 814 DA""I E
CHLMVM, LICENSE EXPIRES 06/30,119 7
........................................I-�L................ ................................... FIL.L NO. P 13,71.5
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 31 of 208
Nllllllllllppl
i»I mllrmlmlolmalllmlirm
.,, X11 ori
D % G 'i Ylpp/ // D1rD
mlm
>ruuulmm�mmlm°�"
mlmwmuuum m�0
� I
OR
I
miul
frd�"
10
jjjjjjjjjjjjjffffff
VIII
mm�,mmlllll�l
"��rdl�lllllllllllllmuummulllllmlllllllumuulllllllllllllllllllllllrrrmmllllluum�m�m�p1��
i000
r I�
0111,
001
��IIL14
f If
NATIONAL ......
If '1���11111111111
X1111111
00
0 r
� IIIIII �� °;�° �IUUUUIfII �� ;91r
SIL IIS �I11
ISI
���fIIIII
li'isII rl� ��, � �� � �� �� � ���- � IIII ���
� l�
III
U, tilCA
�� IIII III �� Ill
ii S ILII
111,1 q Il�j �a � .
� Ilj
�
( ' IllllllU� J1J11I,III11��VlJ�J�JJ�lllll
UUUUUUUUUIII�
''� � ��irip �� � � �" ,i�dUUUUUUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
�IIL ��� iiiii�i I� �I �� �` � UU1111000UUUUII�IDDDDDDIfi� ,
,III �1p111 �111L
J�j1� I�II�I SII � �ro
�illl
II� ii
o ��"
l��ITL II�� 1111��i
ON N,
i
r ligCHULA
% �IIL �
�
IIIL w ///
IIe ` c mrr ed�d
IIII.. '� 0
F o �� �� �11�1�111111�11111����
I
1 o000
/ I
gR
(p7,
04j)
� �� ���11111111111111111111111��������111��������1��11�11�1
„��IIIUIfl�lillinll(�IfY1N/Op�q �)�)�)
.. ', %
�V�V�V�141
" "iso rGO 0
� l6iu
�9I,u/dam l a y10 a ti ,tt,Center
� E
I� �, Trolley 1� IFIL 816 l on
'tiff"
��40��11�'Gl��lDO �
r Street Park P"kroj1nect Lo(-;--ation 01130,260 520 780 1,04,0
ft
C1W OF
CHULA VISTA Date Printed:
October 7, 2019
Qisclaime2WOAe 1AAgdadaugaiAeVed to be accurate,but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legaldocument and should not be substituted for a title search„appraisaP,agai&2cofcMning verification.
A0
ir 'quality Analysis, for, the
R *)N
D Street Park Project
C Chula Vista, California
Prepared for
City of Chula Vista
Development Services Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Contact: Ms. Cheryl Goddard
Prepared by
RECON Environmental, Inc.
1927 Fifth Avenue
San Diego, CA 92101
P 619.308.9333
RECON Number 8819
August 18, 2017
,ell
............
Primary Author
Jack T. Emerson, Air Quality Analyst
Reviewed and Approved by
William A. Maddux, Senior Air Quality Specialist
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 33 of 208
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive ................................................................................................... �
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3
2~0 Pr����� N�� ......................................................................................... 3
6.0 Regulatory
.................................................................................. �
3.1 Federal Regulations ____------------_________-----.7
3.2 State Regulations ____------------_______--------1O
�
.� .1 rid
4~o Environmental �� ................................................................................. 1�
4.1 Geographic Setting................................................................................... .13
4.2 Climate .............................................................................................................13
4.3 ExistingAir Quality--_____--------------__—_—_--..14
ThresholdsThresholds ��
���� ..........................................................................
�~�
5.1 Environmental Health Risk Criteria...............................................................19
6~0 and Assumptions ..................................................................��
6.1 Emissions.......................................................................2O
6.2 Emissions ...........................................................................21
6.3 Environmental Health Risk.............................................................................22
7~0 Air Quality Assessment................................................................................27
7.1 Emissions.......................................................................27
7.2 Emissions ...........................................................................27
7.3 Environmental Risk Assessment Results........................................................28
7.4 Impact Analysis_--_—__----------------_—__-----3O
��0 Conclus ions.....................................................................................................33%
9.0 1"Ieferences 34
I: Regional Location.......................................................................................................... 4
2: Aerial Photograph of Project Vicinity--_---------------_--_—_- 5
3: Proposed Site Plan
4: PMmGround Level Concentrations—_---------------___—_---..29
D Street,Park Project
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)
TABLES
1. Ambient Air Quality Standards ................................................................................... 8
2: Air Quality Measurements at the Chula Vista Monitoring Station...........................15
3. Air Quality Significance Thresholds ...........................................................................19
4: Construction Schedule and Equipment................................................................****##621
5: Summary of Worst-case Construction Emissions (pounds per day)..........................27
6: Project Operational Emissions (pounds per day)........................................................28
7: Construction Emissions (pounds per day)...............................................................060031
ATTACHMENTS
1: Coal Mod Output—Project Emissions
2: Health Risk Assessment Calculations Summary Output
D Street,Park Project
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 35 of 208
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
,Acronyms
OF degrees Fahrenheit
gg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter
AAQiS Ambient Air Quality Standards
AB Assembly Bill
ARB Air Resources Board
ASF age-,sensitivity factors
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAQS California Ambient fir Quality Standards
CCAA California Clea.fir Act
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CARR California fir Resources Board
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
City City of Chula Vista.
Co carbon monoxide
DPM diesel particulate matter
H&SC Health & Safety Code
HQ Hazard Quotient
1-5 Interstate 5
mg/kg milligram per kilogram
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NO2 nitrogen dioxide
ox oxides of nitrogen
OE --A office of:environmental Health Hazard Assessment
Pb lead
PM10 particulate matter less than 10 microns
PM2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns
ppb parts per billion
ppm parts per million
RAQiS Regional Air Quality Strategy
REL Preference .exposure Level
ROCS reactive organic gases
SANDAG Sam. Diego Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast fir Quality Management District
SDAB San Diego Air Basin
SDAPCD San Diego Air Pollution Control District
Islip State Implementation Plan
S02 sulfur dioxide
SOX oxides of sulfur
TAC toxic air contaminants
TCM Transportation Control Measures
TIS "traffic Impact.analysis
U.S. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
TSC United States Code
VOC volatile organic compounds
D Street Pari Project
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 36 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
Executive
This report evaluates potential local and regional air quality impacts associated with the
proposed D Street Dark project (project) located along the segment of D Street to the gest of
woodlawn Avenue in the city of Chula vista, California. The project would include removal
of approximately 18,000 square feet of pavement to make room for park uses, and
approximately 10,000 square feet of pavement refinishing and restriping to create 2
parking spaces and a trash enclosure. Miscellaneous improvements associated with the
project would include extension of water lines as needed to provide for irrigation of park
landscaping, sidewalk improvements along the northern boundary of the project site, and
installation of park amenities such as benches and an active recreation area.
The project site is designated as RMH (Residential-Medium High) land use in the City of
Chula Vista's (City's) general flan. The project proposes a public park, which is a lower
intensity land use than is typical of the Rl' H Land use designation. Because the project
would be consistent with the general plan land use designation, the project would be
consistent with the growth anticipated by the general plan. The project would, therefore,.
not result in an increase in emissions that are not already accounted for in the regional air
quality strategy (RAQS). Thin, the project would not interfere with implementation of the
IRAQ S or other air quality plans.
Emissions associated with construction and operation of the project were calculated in
order to determine if the project would result in emissions that would violate any air quality
standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, and to
determine if the project would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal
or state ambient air quality standard. As calculated in this analysis, project construction
and operations emissions would not exceed the applicable City significance thresholds.
These thresholds are designed to provide limits below which project emissions would not
significantly change regional air quality. As project emissions would be well below these
limits, project construction would not result in regional emissions that would exceed any
ambient air quality standards or contribute to existing violations.
The evaluation conducted in this Air Toxics Disk evaluation was based on assumptions
regarding emissions from diesel-fueled truck traffic on Interstate 5. Cancer risks were
calculated for -year, 30-year, and70-year exposure scenarios based on emission rates from
the 2014 Emissions Factor Model (EMFAC2014) and the California Department of
Transportation's Emissions Factor Model (CT-EMFAC2014). 'Traffic volumes for Interstate
5 were obtained from the San. Diego Association. of Governments' traffic information
forecast model. Based on the predicted ground level concentrations, the excess cancer risk
at the proposed active recreation area would be approximately 4.2 in one million and the
mon-cancer chronic risk would be less than the health hazard index.
It should be noted that the variability in parameters such as absorption rates, breathing
rates, boder weight, frequency of exposure, and fraction of time spent at D Street Park exist
D Street Park Project
Page 1
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 37 of 20
R_ _E C C)N Air Quality Analysis
even in a narrowly defined age group or sensitive receptor subpopulation. This creates a
level of uncertainty in calculating exposures and associated risks for individuals within a
particular receptor population that presumably would receive the same intake doses. Thus,
for this analysis the office of Environmental Health Lazard Assessment (OEHHA)
standard default factors, which represent the upper limit of these exposure parameters,
generally overestimate risks. Thus, the risks reported represent an upper-bound of
estimated risk and are considered conservative. Assumptions regarding the exposure
frequency and duration have been revised to reflect a worst-case scenario for the maximally
exposed individual receptor associated with a neighborhood park. The of HA has not
published recommended assumptions for exposure frequencies and durations for
neighborhood parks. Use of OEH A recommended exposure frequencies and duration for
residential uses would increase the estimated cancer risk.
The project does not include industrial or agricultural uses that are typically associated.
with objectionable odors. The project would involve the use of diesel-powered equipment
during construction. Diesel exhaust may occasionally be noticeable at adjacent properties;
however, construction activities would be temporary and the odors would dissipate quickly
in an outdoor environment. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant.
D Street Park Project
Page 2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 38 of 20
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
1.0 Introduction
The purpose of this report is to assess potential short-term and long-term local and regional
air quality impacts resulting from development of the proposed D Street Park Project
(project). The project would include removal of the segment of D Street to the west of
Woodlawn Avenue and the development of a community park.
The project site is located within the San Diego .Air Basin SD AB), one of 15 air basins that
geographically divide the state of California. The S AB is currently classified as a federal
non-,attainment area for ozone and a state non-attainment area for particulate matter less
than 10 microns (PM1o), particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), and ozone.
Air duality impacts can result from the construction and operation of the project.
Construction impacts are short term and result from fugitive dint, equipment exhaust, and
indirect effects associated with construction workers and deliveries. operational impacts
can occur on two levels: regional impacts resulting from growth-inducing development or
local effects stemming from sensitive receivers being placed close to pollution sources. In
the case of this project, operational impacts are due to emissions to the air basin from
mobile sources associated ,with vehicular travel along the roadways within the project area
as well as potential health risks from the site's location adjacent to a major freeway,
Interstate 5 (1-5).
The analysis of impacts is based on federal and state Ambient Air Quality
Standards (AAS) and is assessed in accordance with the guidelines, policies, and
standards established by the San Diego .Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) and the
City of Chula Vista (City). Project consistency with the adopted air quality plan for the area
is also evaluated to ensure the project would not conflict with, or obstruct the
implementation of the regional air quality plan. Measures are recommended, as required, to
reduce potentially significant impacts.
2.0 Proj*ect D
""alae D Street Park Project (project) is located along the segment of D Street to the west of
Woodlawn Avenue in the city of Chula Vista, California (Figure . The project is
approximately 0.64 acre and is generally rectangular with a length of approximately
450 feet and a width of approximately 62 feet (Figure 2) The project would include removal
of approximately 18,000 square feet of pavement to make room for active and passive park
uses, and ,approximately 10,000 square feet of pavement refinishing ,and restriping to create
28 parking spaces and a trash enclosure (Figure 3). Active recreational uses would be near
the center of the project site, set back approximately 225 feet from the western edge of the
project site. Approximately 160 feet of D Street would be resurfaced and reoriented to
accommodate parking. Miscellaneous improvements associated with the project would
include extension of water lines as needed to provide for irrigation of park landscaping,
sidewalk improvements along the northern boundary of the project site, and installation of
parr amenities such as benches and an active recreation area.
D Street Park Project
Page 3
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 39 of 20
i r la
,::::, ,.,nom...»„„r e / ,. ,6' /ir, % ��/ i ..✓/1,
,
yyy y
/ >
/ f
r 1
,
r /r
/ f
>' �. 1. r »,
f
/
rr to //✓ / r
/�// ,n i a , », r ..
and I
1,r,/ r r
/ � o / »,'„ / ,,,,rr ,,,, � !army r...%"//„✓�
� 'M�o r ,:;,. 41,n».. �, /Yea. �...,,,, r21, �! ,
r�/�
.;al� /: 1 �
r, m/� xr r lk
�. ,1r,^f,:/GNU / ,„, �r zr/ //„r',,,,, q, :/c, ,/ I ;. /`c.
I,; rhlr � f��li/ � �� mrr� � »„»,,, ,:ra„»»,,,wN 1
r., r,r.,:r, t„ I% �� 1 r„,// r„
r /
I��4'(1y p �I
°i,,,„.
,1[' �
,„ 1 y✓-. „)oma Y"/!/� /�V '�, YI„rc/
a„
,J/, � G / / ✓,,��//i 1p!/ 11 ;✓ ,rrr,.
Ve'lr(/�(, d. ag,,,rnn,a„aa�
� vi
J � ,
✓,x ;�
aKel
"./En�, ' � ^JCr'`7MJ1 d..I..k/k11Y4r1h/,� + rW M„rrISIIrIG t!IVIM Ji'I”, ////// I ,i ii'4 rm N/N
I' J Hra� ff;i+ rr./✓.,m,;ry rv, /,N'wllc:,,x„ Iy �;rl"/i/o rr,,,o; ,/�,: 7Y,� �� ur✓ b .:,:,:,:,
G > v,.l il` j,:,» mrm,,,,a„ h7/ r ff rs1J ,,,,,,,,r »,r”,✓r+ ° ,ma, 0
r,,,,mr
✓f rl
ae,u D/ rl „nIJ
wui f01” �l�Nf/ N / I �, IIS l
<° / ,a/},°/+ r' 4 1 u' fir„ °✓
�1 9"rrrr�91niiNl, I„r,re.. ' »„�»N
I✓, 11 vII A,TI r tiw. ... rIY f��p1:, ✓/ � rf�.0, X41. ;,;,: G)IG°'
I.
I�' r
r,,
ir`rr,, l
Iwryu �- �
",1&”'...n, iii��///r,,,, SII V�,'GD,rr✓i✓ /�»,rrrd% l I »,,d IA 4r
,a r« rte: ,,,,t.: ...........m,a '/ ,✓x 1
✓ri�,»» arr'01 /Ar li1'Fa 1 GA '�„////i / ///
y r���y ps
C
1r �
,,, ad
j'/ilio,,,,
WAMIII
SYN r '
1/o iG
0 a".:U�,»,1,,
' Ji”
v £,
V I 4s
D
4
Il f
//,✓,�� � %j%/ilii',r, :, ✓'i„, it/// �, ,rr,,, '" If����w';d ;,VI..� I�
rill �rr�� /, a ri0/i/// % // / /.. d � ✓
Ti ai✓,r r,/i /iii?i ,r%jj I NUVw r
�� /%✓� Ta j/�� 1 ��/%fl,✓�/�����/T: I �✓"r^, ��� w r:mr Wv � 'III'
r
Of,
Iu,%�! �' %/1fG„qi I ;w�uwm Ix Ix Bar o,A/a
»(�InIIU rr ii,,, r, °x. IuIU'"
;; ,,; �i”; ,, '..T �.ice'. gr y.
,,, A/GA /i//%ii/////: ,,„ I�,. ✓,�rr�y ,rr;i/ //���,�^S,N: 4 +a lug ;Iw” wWm
"r
»omoo
ri 11
w
4
/ R
/,r« r xrFl a iii h ,, ,� w
/f%G„ .G
ri'w,„ //i,,;.,rr(( ` ,111 / r ,/� ” ,. %„// r
,..ref /ii r / ..r / /
Y'r' /iic;;, n///„/ '' ,///' ,,,, ^ ....rl/ ', ;' i ria,,,.....:// „r�r0 "I ,
Jr
I M, //,/n! ,r;;,, ,' /irl///� r/„/r,v rr%:::,,,,;%r „% r// /a///ii/j I,l
7>I✓„ ;r//s 'frau/fir rJlr� ,,ii/////�/%%/ ,,,,,,, %/'vJ r;; a ,,,,, rr„rte /
, Jal1% /////// r„4 i/A
CNN' ,4%yam�G'j /irG/// rrc»,,,wr rrI A»✓,,,,, /ilii% ,� /f
/
Y
//i 1I' / ,,,�„
�/ r v G m, r as r � // / N '&
r ° rii n I� ,/Ar� w,.J'” .wm d'""'a�'N 4 �)J
/,,, Fr' %
,a� ifs
S'
a los Y r✓lryRrJlu�"'%
/ T7 0 IV
/
w
,r IIIc,
/orr/✓», r a `/Alal,�aI mrc /`�r4riM l• a I ul�1/ ���/%, I
//r IIf �j 11 R IA: i"///////�/� �Y ,. J:” 'a p.. f.
/ r r rl✓n i "1 Aw rrr uk r ,vy //i���� 1� '� / 01,11111,
/ roa,,,
ua� ,a� » r "41 i,;ryi //i /i//// ”" ..
,,SAN �� .%"x I;;, /� � r 1 ,,rl
I i Jfr/ n
A rrr ra,we � „��� ��/rr � °,11 xr,;„„ -� ^r,r,,,
,,, >�",,,uAl/rr„ I((r",,,;,, ;/ /h^ ,,,,rrw. ,Ik // ��� s' ,✓ >�
/, imGl,u^" ,r,Ur c Nr.. ,,,»„ ,)IT, "" /iii/ f!% � rrrri 1 d p ,,x,.. m°». ,
/vM,rl /,a / »r„»„rr�r,J ,,,,,,r// �� aryev. �v1 ;,,,,;;,% �vJf1„i'� � o an �,,,.,,,;,:,,'
/ r � f> r... :..III/r,';;/// �Y;^'1�y �W„�auw �w �,,.. /�� »✓ »;. �d tl
El
”,
f/ // r 'k
,ry ., ,'/'. ,/ �/ /.;.ir, ";n rig /�/ r ,,,,,,
4 rr ra✓r /a errf%✓,,,,, ,,,. II,,,, 'll ,,;:„��,,, „ ,', „r ",� � r���, ���”�.� ../ ,,. o. as � /,.
rfv r <. , �::',n,'/ / %�/ rr / ,r/ Yr. ////j�/ r^g�p^p
„///,,, I� „I /'„ /r, / / /,/r'f //r// e g
�.,.a/4 r�,,r;;, ,s', ', '�,,,,//j r/iii /„///%/////�//:�,,./////////// ,,,,,, r'f ,: : '�:* �'�
M/.,, Grxl//// „; ,.: V,"",.,r,,i„ „/ l+,n;'r ,,,,//i// / �,: �� // ,r /iii ,,..,.
y r v �// � �ii/ v
�, r ,,,, ;,, r,,,,,.,/�,ai,�, i”. .;,”,/ �'/iii� �✓„a r,
^� �„f ,r/i��ar..4c ,.✓ „a,,., ,r %r /'//�/, rrr / i fi/i/i,,, ;»d rr ,,:,r�.. rr.
%/
;, ;/"' „i;'io/, / f
!
� .,,
e � I
„f ,:`i✓ / ,r,e,,;, ,, v
rrr // a N /i/' // / /✓r/,
r� � p'
I� �I �!r' &,,,»:.G'•'�,&''� r ,,,✓' ,�. ,;ar"„� i/r,r/� ,ii ,i./,�� ,. ,.,/ /,.r, 4 f T
1if4r ,,:rr �ll: ;�f,' ,,.I � ,,, otd�rr ,r rrr.,; ,;;;;ii i., ✓,,,„�,, ///�/,,,,/ r r/ � 1 i
yl(� %// ,,;;,, r r//r ✓;;�,/ll/'�,,//f � ,f � �////,”' ld
rf11)"(41
,r,,,✓r,/ �/1.
U/ „»rr✓„/ /%/ �p /,/iii I ±
r a ,✓° fr/,/ ' / .i”
T,
1414'��' �R�� ��
a �
;:.I v�rI.rr✓{r roar....:r;l„„o/r/,,.f,r,,r.,,.,r��,,r,l,c..,r,/,///r////ir/i//,i�ri//////%:i r.,/,,,/,,y.. ,,,r,/r, JsI
L�~/""S�.V,;w..r.,.r�,,r,rm.,�,fig.,✓ r'r�i.«t-
ti
telGardens
r
hmaa
«I
d
r 0 /i
rrr, :9r JJi r,,,,L o! rr%L rr//+,: / /. ( �.
,,....., », a. I,....: ».,,, / U,.///„iii �ISI,': l xrr�„�rr((r rf�
„ r” �,r, r, N,rr�/vf„/// ,o” A! IJ r
,„ ,i . // / �r � w /%%//r „�m
✓, /rr/,, 4,, «/
1„ r✓" f r, /�r/i, �,r„ r: �,,, »^ ar../i ,✓✓�„ Park,
! ,,rill/%, r%/,+ ric,,,/r/,. 4; �, .,,/ ,✓r.. rrrr /:
. � � E
fjr,.
uvr A,/rH
r ,
/ ,;r ,ri%/1/� ,r,,ii,?✓, r,c "Frrvr?� 11� rr
rr r✓ //
T „'(/., r x ✓s/ilii' %/„r/�AN// a a,,rr ,vr „r,✓
» /rrr//a p//, I�a; ,r✓ ,,,:., ,„ ✓ ,;;,r ., d'.xl..,1,,,,,,,,r✓,� „W I,,, "; urs� r.
r» ,A„
,f / / �1
VY ,o . ulml
„,
.rr ,,,,, „M1 ,,r v rr 4l s„ �....d 'I ;
/ r "N"J"', a r
rr,,.l 7i f„4' /( .,, .His u� ,✓ d
r✓, r ,..,v /:.u, ... A,,. S
,rn r ,x
.rr ri'( )
r»r..v`.,, r0r w'
»,,,,, naYl/,lb
wuY,� �,✓////I� A f ✓, rT' ,1,any.nnn / %/ ,rlr, 11',,,,,, , � 1 /r.:a✓<rrr,
i,
A„ /r,{r.
H,a,,,;,,,,,,,/y �Ilpr�h'�»»w l,nNnr rr,»r,��
,a� ,a /ly,:.r ,i, I!;,: r I)'i�,,;,"' ✓Iris �, ::,,� / II..
» 'V
a A A
/s' Crest
�',fig+
rr n L+'",'+:3 I' ✓
r,rirvrf/
r'a,. rrr r,ti , vey J,rry rel r
rrr, ` v�Dd
lr✓ I,^, 1/51 1'
A,r r / % rrr P r//r/r rm„, 1
a x
/,
r ,�, c;;';;c, ,,,. ;r, 'a„ /;; /iri;"ro'Ir// I{✓��',, r„ r� �
//, ......////",
„✓„:I t, ,
;;�,)if„
Ih/r, ,¢;; r �irrr%✓ ''/ „i/, 1r„/ / ,V ^ "'/ ';✓
rig h
'/e ✓/rar„f ,,,, ,,,,, , ,,,' ,,,,,, N/i,r r r,Ir e, f 'z', '! i,r ,�,,:1
. r,r r,,,,� I rllrla / y
(rrr ,rr:Y;,�J ,,A� ,dl
vr. aaa,
J/,vfu -orb r, r J»,Jr.rr/rr Rr,r»,rn' r r.;.
r, r u)�,: I..::„ r/`r v1 I,f ,; L r,r,/n»Vl ,.. r,,.,
r% ;/„rr;,lr I f ;,r � f f r� /s � ,,,,,, / !x,,,,.,,»„rH.:
//f / !P,;III it+' F 114 lu l lY ” c//
114,��uU r�°4 l' 1 ua.��� /, A r,,,,Vlr / J ,rj1 `4J LI”trt lL.il
///Y I d t7
rI
ff �r
„o / Y;' I 4 ,x,� ,,m,,,;, %^rro� �mo»,a llr;.. , rlu , ,„n»V
/ 1.. y p rar,�r ,.A,roti rN °,Ir o W
,4 >T,w :;:� I,,,r'r1,Wn f i;,INa rS''tiNNM. ag 1✓4,;
f /y; v„rm
11 „yJ i✓orr y( / 1J � .,rar,.m,,.r NOlva„
r
IY�V� ,,,,/,� �dP Ir IIf
[+ep*y/rte p+��y
,:;r,,,, �����s3f r.f YA Cd��tiJ�!/
P„, v�filjD,” Ir';' ;f % /i//iii/iii/l� // iy/°✓/� »/fir n 8 urrri:,Im✓u 11'. z�,
,�!:L� N ✓” „"w www
,,.,
r
r I
r>0 � r!„ /✓r✓„c,✓t'% '4 fit•� f �, " �Ir, nrl I „ y,,,,r,, �m.,�lar;,„ r III rrm d: t� I I I� ..
o/,„rf✓ ri for/, �, / �I y
V� ;orris If n� n;l �
it/r /»rrrrr /r✓rG/,e/ia Ar„� Vitnn, Aa!'
v r rr� 111-rr✓/„», »; „” ,i%r,✓ r,rn re,✓a arrr it,✓eA/, 'y„ ;dFre” f,'d ,,,orobZ, +:lY,� d''. d '1 �I
IIIA r , q ;flf
/,rr ,!III CI�wIfV j('r;'� '°y AFe"
n`a+y
,K
,pipp� ��^ryry i� ..II
V �� I�«J �dl
f @Ul�1wwIVI�OV0UV�1dV�
r +u”
11'`qri>✓1 f rr/ar r r rl r% Illy, r,r1 �� r r,r rr '/i�h/il�r;'I/,u'+ruL" rf,MIr
I +,�mayy�x sJ
oxoa
,I Irf pp'/Al
4 rrrrr,,, Id 6
I rraliJ;; /�rr rrl 1'arrr (f/✓(l r'31/�l
J�al,� ,T I r ...III I ✓/ n1`��
✓rya/ r I,rN�Vr ,,,,,,.
rrl/ar N
rr G ,rr,�,r;,y,r r Y Yu ',///f' (�1 %� ✓,i;, ;C /fir, u/1>%' I G » kl„Id;l9, 1 fir, N"
;1i /,w;,r,l'✓'N1I�'�� !.. f,r fN' »/✓rr�GrrwHa✓a6, �l „� ) l ILII ,»»r N461 rrx.
f,al/ r'ar„ r rl',. I�� u'r,J e ';;J:'sr(G tl. rr,,,,; fi :.r '!%,r„r,:, ////ii/"u� `:1'u, ,.,»r
M, �) l riii�+M free a,Vf „II J f! + l �/ 71/i/ ///////% /,r f '''b;.
��/ w „C [1, �' �,,,,,, SIP in,rya
y/
f r✓�erid%moo« r a✓�G; ,r ,i,Y r,w1,,,I rf,/G%. r / �'✓%i'G ,.. �l ti
�, ,y
�Jr,, 41/ �,,a,
. ! T! j M:n„m,:,. n„,,"a..:f
I
,Ik✓� //r/f�„ Zfra I I^r'"�O f�7'; tJ ,ll�(D1 e„/rri�Ul/ j ,(l,/a�/ V �l: ��I�'�N^:;r, ,ar/ a ,� ,,,,m»,D ,vr,,,,,,✓a f " t;,,,
Nifll�, ,f 14
;:;,I:...... ,;r;✓' '1”,
D� a✓�
�
�1, r',iii'/'//' f �°, a� Ir r I lrfilr / I, �N ,,, i� r✓�r /�u� I a,a AE rJ/ u
�' r r ✓ r.
', ruga r r
')U"'mmi D�/,� , y' r>p r;;;; ,,,r / /r%' ii/.:" a/1f Nli/area!���r/i,/'''✓r'rr/;ti�»,;r� IT% l ""`, ,,,,;r:;
m l �f° y�/r«, ✓✓A�a f;,I „• ,arr,'",Irf l +4 PrI'll ff," Jamul ul Indian
of ,r »R l rrrr/' �j'
i,,D//j/r r�rrrni//rJl1 r.1rf f,/r as�'11,rriu,�l nraa'rrr N�IY�, '!AI^✓,,,'�y... Village rte^ y
Pr'" j'II IIf �I i./ '1 Ykl ,N r I s Nr r rorrr:A�' ei f�/yj r rlatrG�/ / /',»iflf,:,».,al/�/ , M tl{ IIG
W 9u" IIIUI r. /ilii 1!! f/Y , ,e� ' ter'.
II rV 14
,all u1v✓Y gfunl r'�1....,yr'' r r✓;ora 6ir ,r,<✓ ,„ oir
.;p 3' f�Iu rr,f a,,;/ ✓ rrh / /(^ a g+"' "
r 4' rr Ill r ,p
NDI(f IF✓✓%» ,a%r1 lull"r?!➢r; r�N/wrrl N t f'/m Dk� ri/
'�,F/'�'y�'!
J, ,,pllofj(D4�,ID,"'UVllw uW`^<r (a �. �/In rt'�� w,Nrlf �g/r,Grliirr✓/�,. �;rr'a ':G �� ��� I
Q
rrir4'lii 1yr,f,Trji,ar✓a�l
ra V�la�,u ,Ild" o Y
'� wl�,m'ra"' ary a%✓r:+.�✓rn✓ ,3f i� rffrru r� /,yrs. P o..5'„r : �%/ ✓'�,rlJl ��l//���i�j
,I IV (Ar rn✓'P«r, dr a I t�uu„r Tr Ir/��//�� G';JJ/Jy������: „m
��J
,n; N'+»s ,'�J�""1 rn�T,1x ' �, VI��Nf/"; I t�y;e4 �✓����/./"��1//� �/r�'. �xN,.N
�n» f
ry rrrr, ✓H/o,r,±riq✓: ,,,^�r% �✓��I(rI/�';.�)"I IY�'�/ pltir�pafl,� /� /�j �,r r,�
...
r
Lo NY
111..
l
Prl IIr RSD I
111
�:
„�::::::
X11:
1,,
11 w
1
X11
wq;, �. I ,rrr„rr/r »orrrrr'ifl a.,r,r, rrr» rr/rnUl,Inrru r ,rr, lU/i�/ ��.,,
Y � � ,J,rr rrrr ,rrrr rrr.�G/ �iin ,,,,,a N«� I. ✓ �”
Gni 1,rrrrr f ra ✓
'MH r ,4
/
Na,a« l „rr„ ///t Sx✓+,��@(v (l/r I I///%/ /i/%//�%/ii/ /„ r" GsL";»r011„ '!�Jr ;v1yyy
k� i
%�,DIEGO 0/T, rPUI
aM w w / P/00
,)
#
I"� r✓„ NI�!^�'��� rum»rr
r✓MMMMMMMMMxxarWamo a wloon 4hrrrrr
`0hyr,»» 1
0 Nibs 5
Project Location
FIGURE 1
RECON
Re�i.ronal Location
M:\JOBS5\8819\common—gis\figi.mxd 8/1412917 from.
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet gage 40 of 208
I,
Ima e ours :N arena ( o an None (17)
u.
v
I
IIII:
V V
yy
U
Y I
II
o.
I
II
u
I
Ir
1'a pl
I.V.
I
I�
"51
,V II.. III
v
I
I ( (
I
f
y I, '�r..� ('r'����; 1 II)II I III I%/�i'� J i„: ldl �+ ► li
l d f
�✓J�r9r, �J/„� ,.41// �� rr I`/I/' p;'1��, ,.�I �}epi. 'ISI.,I
.r
1
II'
r
/ I
I
r�
�r ,1
^f p � t�j1111
I
r
�J ,f/f a✓ r 'V �� �r, �- h, ,r r ,,,:,� II �,. ' ,.� 'r`.:,V y1r�,. �� ���/j�/%I-J 'J
ellr I/i i rv1 I' t I f I w Ir�, G s
n q I Iry.
IA
nP I I n
ii rl I I
I', a
IIS pN
f � ,
IIII, �I
' � W
/,�
�'wu
u
p'
r^flj�e
SII
,
Y <„
r r
f
1111111 II
wen
r
�iciiyill
I
fi
11J111
J-
T
,
!
I
ry i r II
`,a�r, y i,: ',t ;.. ,1 I ;o',. I f ;rr' I I I�°lid',r« '';. �?•. �°.,���� J VI��:..... V II'.
ul I�jj
ovrr m
I
` 1111111
`r!;,, �';,, I, .. i I -� r 'r ,,, 1” i ,,,, � ,I � ,, hu „,�r✓,rrau;, „r','�; ;/ ,,...:.
I
luu I
�1 uuu
�I
IIIIV,
u
I
rd
II mu'
'� Irv;: ,�' ;,;,, >` !G, ,, r r, r��..✓r , ,. r ,. �, l r,ri'/d�'
., ,,'. ;-„ r:. � «r. � ,a,,V r, I' �IR,,, ,l /,i„ ,;�'N I I,,;�„,,,,,„,::� m,, I �4� •i1Y %;''��� ;:�;%'/.. ,III R
v I
4
I
r '
�v
0 11 wriw
U
n
Iv
0
M1
I '
-
N
al
rl,r,
1
}f
�r': IIII
1 Iv I
cl 1
I
u
I
4 /
V
I I
uw
II'
u
r p
U
,-
NII
Vl II ill!'. I f I-
1
II ��
i,�
r, I
i
uu 1
l I
/ r
�a
i
�,( �li ..,:- ;'. II,<�, r/i ,.. �/J��.cfri � ! ,� .✓ r.. ,ru"��. ,% ,,6,/i �„�� ,:r W° ;'' r:ol �, ';W' .a
l
III
'I
r I, II ,� Ill���aairgr,,1 lliil� l I,l Wv II /r, r� r�pl(
0
I
1,
19V II
V
h
1
I� V„
I l
VJf%r,%';,. � �l ,,, i 7 r' ` ,,!„r�/.,� Ys,,,'' r°I;rr�/ �j v': :.Vii' � �llC u��r;✓ , ,�r�1' V;y
J f
I
I y
/
i
r
i / rUl
I I ii
I
I
Yr
I
II
y I
I III I I Y I V,'III�II
I
/
s
I 1
1
r,
..r
L I
PI.
IJ,
n
i
,rI
r,
l
i
nl
t
r w°
Vµo.
Sir
% .
r,
I
1
1.
1
m,
I
Ii U
VV I
V I
I f
rV I f.
I
v e,
YI
VVVVV VV
I
i.
IIS 'Y Clr MI ,
Ilrl I /(
1u
Ilr�r� (�-�' �� '..%;.,, �. fi I I ,. �. ;, ,,.�J t; `.,',:��/ rr1,VJ !YI Yl I�,%,,, ,,, 'r/,,,'..I , ,,, ;v➢rlllmr�'
J✓l�% j � �, 1 ,�r�/ ,I, / IuV;waw I�i fi I,/,. r, 1/
II Y
it" i',T�'4 ;' ,/s /''r i' I'. 1 r't� a�, IVr. ,,,r ✓% �� ,,,s ri IJ,% ti"/';' 'dr:.
1
!I
IIII I�r�rym�
I w
a,
f I
I
� NN
G i
I
,
1
o,,, �%'/ �, /�,, ���r ►.;f°l II" 7j f 1 ; �W J�� fir, ,i/�, f II
� IiIII s
I
I
1
0
Irr
I
If; VW�
II l
V
I
1
6 r;
'i
I
1. tl
g.,
I z
r'
i f,/
6
l
I
XV
it
r I
l
:r
I r uY:
� Ilr
I
I
1
I
III
V
V�I it
II il..
I
J
I
u
i
/
I.
v,
i(1'
tlr
Ili
`
;, 9�� ✓ I 4eh � lYri i, I s u � SrYI I i
1,
I
I I.
V
I
r.
r
Mill
I
SII% I r,I
ti
� rI
,43,�
r
Y
Wu
r
l
r„
I
1 i
i 1
,r
I
I V
J /
I
l r
i'
rr. :f„r�. ., �l� / /H / ➢'j r'r�,. '�,,, f Vla, ” �r�/�j e - ,,,,.w- 1/ ��J
fI1
rl Ir
r
I;
�i
Vi I
.I.
4l
I VIII
I I
r,.
I
I
r" u.II 11
I
v r II
�:I III 1
a
r 1
I III
r �
('I l
r
1 I
1 I
I F,
r 1'
u
4 I n
%; ✓ iu �„ '� 1, ',, l- I ,J�'
I
t:
IY
/
I,
Y
II!
r
I
1
I
I II
I�
IIIIIi(� III' �I
iMR
/
'/
i
0 Feet 150
Project Boundary
FIGURE 2
CON N
Pr "e ct Location on Aerial P oto o'ra h
M:\JIOBS5'18819\common gi lfig2,mxd 8/14/2417 fmm
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 41 of 20
.........
M�/
tit
.........
3
Ae,�,I:
............
llr.q l�j
2
It 'I "", " ,
h
476
OR
JIM
J,M�r
1 00
01
AM WIN
ON111
%
CIO
v)
T"
C,
dWg
F1991 vpp,;,,_ppp))pW
5
T/
NON, ........
%
'WOO
th l, ?
282
& AM/
W, "I
rgrvv", % H /A'A
,g 4
om//A,
/ov
N
Ali
off
KAIf
ki 0",
iv
4
g
INA er All,
"A I
-oil
............
A
N
It PARK 1011 1:51W
..........
to
MOO,"
tq
lip 41,
J
Q
f
hq5?W
k
"t mm,
qqmg
'N"
..... ......... N
.&A!
Fee 50
Project Boundary
FIGURE 3
RI C Cr)N Proposed Site Plan
M:\JOBS5\8819\common_gis\fig3.mxd 8/1412017 fmm
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 42 of 208
UCON Air Quality Analysis
The site was graded previously for the development of D Street. The project would not
include any buildings. Project construction is likely to be limited to pavement demolition,
minor utilities trenching, pavement resurfacing/re striping, minor sidewalk
rehabilitation/improvement, landscaping, and installation of park amenities. Project
construction may occur, concurrently with the development of the 701 D Street Project on
the north-adjacent parcel.
3.0 l Framework
3.1 Federal. Regulations
AAQS represent the maximum levels of background pollution considered safe, with an
adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health and welfare. The federal Clean Air
Act (CAA) was enacted in 1970 and amended in 1977 and 1990 [42 United States
Code (USCF) 7401] for the purposes of protecting and enhancing the quality of the nation's
air resources to benefit public health, welfare, and productivity. In 1971, in order to achieve
the purposes of Section 109 of the CAA [42 USC 7409], the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) developed primary and secondary National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Six criteria pollutants of primary concern have been designated: ozone, carbon
monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (1' 02), lead (Pb), and respirable
particulate matter (P to and PM2,5). The primary NAAQS ". . . in the judgment of the
Administrator, based on such criteria and allowing an adequate margin of safety, are
requisite to protect the public health . . . " and the secondary standards ". . . protect the
public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects associated with the presence
of such air pollutant in the ambient air" [42 USC 7409(b)(2)]. The U.S. EPA classifies
specific geographic areas as either "attainment" or "nor attain areas for each
pollutant based on the comparison of measured data with the NAAQS. States are required
to adopt, enforceable plans, known as a State Implementation Plan (SIP), to achieve and
maintain air quality meeting the NAAQS. State plans also must control emissions that drift
across state lines and harm air quality in downwind states. The NAAQS are presented in
Table I (California Air Resources Board [C AI 2016).
D Street Park Project
Page 7
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 43 of 208
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
Table 1
Ambient Air Quality Standards
r" 'St' dards'l, rdS2
raging 'o nia, an n
Av el Calif Natio' al Standa,
P,61lutant, -
'Method4 3 5, So dar, 46
Time Conc''' trat* ' I 'Primary, on Method'7,
en ti y
1 Hour 0.09 ppm Same as
Ozone,8 (18 m3) Ultraviolet Primary Ultraviolet
8 Hour 0.0 7 ppm Photometry 0.070 ppm Standard Photometry
(137 gg/M3) (137�L /M3)
Respirable 24 Hour 50 gg/m3 150 gg/M3_ Inertial
Particulate Annual Gravimetric or Same as Separation and
Matter Arithmetic 20[tg/M3 Beta - Primary Gravimetric
(PMI,0)9' mean Attenuation Standard Analysis
Same as
Fine 24 Hour No Separate State Standard 35 gg/m3 Primary Inertial
Particulate Standard Separation and
Matter Annual Gravimetric or Gravimetric
(PM 2,5)`) Arithmetic 12 gg/M3 Beta 12 gg/m3 15 gg/m3 Analysis
Mean Attenuation
1 Hour 20 ppm 35 ppm -
(23 (40 mg/m3)
Carbon 8 Hour 9.0 ppm. Non-dispersive 9 ppm. Non-dispersive
Monoxide (10 Mg/M3) Infrared (10 mg/m3) Infrared
(CO) 8 Hour 6 ppm Photometry Photometry
(Lake ppm
Tahoe)
I Hour 0.18 ppm 100 ppb
Nitrogen (339 gg/m3) Gas Phase (188 gg/M3) Gas Phase
Dioxide Annual Same as Chemi-
0.030 ppm Chemi- 0.053 ppm
(NO2)10 Arithmetic (57gg/M3) luminescence (100µg/M3) Primary luminescence
Mean Standard
I Hour 0.25 ppm 75 ppb -
(655 gg/m3) (196 gg/M3)
3 Hour - - 0.5 ppm Ultraviolet
(1,300 Fluorescence;
Sulfur Ultraviolet �tg/M3) Spectro-
Dioxide 0.04 ppm Fluorescence 0.14 ppm. photometry
(S02)11 24 Hour (105gg/M3) (for certain — (Pararosaniline
areas)IJ Method)
Annual 0.030 ppm
Arithmetic — (for certain —
Mean areas)I
30 Day 1.5 gg/M3 —
Average
Calendar 1.5�tg/M3 High Volume
Leadl,2,13 Quarter — Atomic (for certain Same as Sampler and
Absorption areas)12 Primary Atomic
Rolling Standard Absorption
3-Month 0.15 gg/M3
Average
Beta
Visibility Attenuation
Reducing 8 Hour See footnote 14 and
ParticleS14 Transmittance
through Filter
Tape No National Standards
Sulfates 24 Hour 25 gg/M3 Ion Chroma-
tography
Hydrogen 1 Hour 0.03 ppm Ultraviolet
Sulfide 42 gg/M3) Fluorescence
F Vinyl Chm
12 24 Hour 0.01 ppm Gas roa-
Chloride I (26,�L/M3 to a hy
See footnotes on next pc e.
D Street,Park Project
Page 8
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 44 of 208
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
ppm=parts per million;ppb=parts per billion;µg/m,3=micrograms per cubic meter;—=not applicable.
California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (I and 24 hour),
nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter (PMo, PM2,5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be
exceeded.All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the
Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations.
2 National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to
be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration
measured at each site in a year,averaged over three years,is equal to or less than the standard. For PM1o,the 24-
hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average
concentration above 150 pg/M3 is equal to or less than one, For PM2.5, the 24-hour standard is attained when 98
percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. Contact the
U.S. EPA for further clarification and current national policies.
Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are
based upon a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr.Most measurements of air quality
are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr;ppm in this table refers
to ppm by volume,or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.
4 Any equivalent measurement method which can be shown to the satisfaction of the Air Resources Board to give
equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used.
5 National Primary Standards:The levels of air quality necessary,with an adequate margin of safety to protect the
public health,
6 National Secondary Standards:The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or
anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant.
7 Reference method as described by the U.S, EPA. An"equivalent method"of measurement may be used but must
have a"consistent relationship to the reference method"and must be approved by the U.S. EPA.
8 On October 1, 2015,the national 8-hour ozone primary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070
ppm.
9 On December 14, 2012,the national annual PM2,5 primary standard was lowered from 15µg/m`3 to 12.0 g/ `3.The
existing national 24-hour PM2,5 standards (primary and secondary) were retained at 35 ;tg/m`3, as was the annual
secondary standards of 15, [tg/m3. The existing 24-hour PMo standards (primary and secondary) of 150µg/m,3 also
were retained. The form of the annual primary and secondary standards is the annual mean, averaged over 3
years.
10 To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1-hour daily
maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. Note that the national standards are in units of
parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the
national standards to the California standards the units can be converted from ppb to ppm. In this case, the
national standard of 100 ppb is identical to 0,100 ppm.
11 On June 2, 2010, a new 1-hour S02 standard was established and the existing 2,4-hour and annual primary
standards were revoked.To attain the 1-hour national standard,the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of
the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971 SO2 national standards
(24-hour and annual)remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard,except that
in areas designated nonattainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until
implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved.
Note that the 1-hour national standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of
parts per million(ppm).To directly compare the I-hour national standard to the California standard the units can
be converted to ppm.In this case,the national standard of 75,ppb is identical to 0.075 ppm.
12 The ARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as'toxic air contaminants'with no threshold level of exposure for
adverse health effects determined. These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below
the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants.
13 The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3,-month average. The 1978 lead
standard (1.5 pg/M3 as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the
2008 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains
in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved.
14 In 1989, the ARB converted both the general statewide 10-mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30-mile
visibility standard to instrumental equivalents,which are"extinction of 0.23 per kilometer"and"extinction of 0.07
per kilometer"for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards,respectively.
SOURCE: CARR 2016.
D Street,Park Project
Page 9
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 45 of 208
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
An area within astate is designated as either attainment or non-attainment for a
particular pollutant. States are required to adopt enforceable plans, known as SIP, to
achieve and maintain air quality meeting the NAAQS. Mate plans also must control
emissions that drift across state lines and harm air quality in downwind states. once a non-
attainment area has achieved the NAAQS for a particular pollutant, it is redesignated as
an attainment area for that pollutant. To be redesignated, the area must meet air quality
standards for three consecutive years. After redesignation to attainment, the area is known
as a maintenance area and mint develop a plan demonstrating how the air quality
standards will be maintained.
3.2 State Relations
3.2.1 Criteria P
The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) was enacted in 1988 California Health & Safety Code
[H&SC] §39000 et seq. . Under the CCAA, CARB has developed the California Ambient Air
Quality Standards CAAS} and generally has set more stringent limits on the criteria
pollutants than the NAAQS (see Table 1). In addition to the federal criteria pollutants, the
CAAQS also specify standards for visibility-reducing particles, sulfates, hydrogen sulfide,
and vinyl chloride (see Table 1).
The state of California is divided geographically into 15 air basins for managing the air
resources of the Mate on a regional basis. Areas within each air basin are considered to
share the same air masses and, therefore, are expected to have similar ambient air quality.
Similar to the CAA, the Mate classifies these specific geographic areas as either
`attainment" or "nonattainment" areas for each pollutant based on the comparison of
measured data with the CAAQS. The SDAB is a non-attainment area for the Mate ozone,
PPLO, and PM2.5 standards.
3.2.2 Toxic Air Contaminants
The public's exposure to toxic air contaminants (TACs) is a significant public health issue in
California. Diesel-exhaust particulate matter emissions have been established as TACs. In
1983, the California Legislature enacted a program to identify the health effects of 'BACs
and to reduce exposure to these contaminants to protect the public health. (Assembly Bill
[AB] 1807: Health and Safety Code Sections 39650-39674). The Legislature established a
two-step process to address the potential health effects from TACs. The first step is the risk
assessment (or identification) phase. The second step is the risk management or control)
phase of the process.
The California. Air Toxics Program establishes the process for the identification and control
of TACs and includes provisions to make the public aware of significant toxic exposures and
for reducing risk. Additionally, the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act
(AB 2588, 1987, Connelly Bill) was enacted in 1987 and requires stationary sources to
report the types and quantities of certain substances routinely released into the air.
D Street Park Project
.page 10
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 46 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
The goals of the Air Toxics " of 'pots" Act are to collect emission data, to identify facilities
having localized impacts, to ascertain health risks, to notify nearby residents of significant
risks, and to reduce those significant risks to acceptable levels.
The Children's environmental Health Protection Act, California Senate Bill 25
(Chapter 731, hscutia, Statutes of 1999), focuses on children's exposure to air pollutants.
The act requires CARR to review its air quality standards from a children's health
perspective, evaluate the statewide air monitoring network, and develop any additional air
toxic control measures needed to protect children's health. Locally, toxic air pollutants are
regulated through the S APCD's Regulation XII. of particular concern statewide are
diesel-exhaust particulate matter emissions. Diesel-exhaust particulate matter was
established as a TAC in 1998, and is estimated to represent a majority of the cancer risk
from TACs statewide (based on the statewide average). Diesel exhaust is a complex mixture
of gases, vapors, and fine particles. This complexity makes the evaluation of health effects
of diesel exhaust a complex scientific issue. Some of the chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as
benzene and formaldehyde, have been previously identified as TACs by the CARR and are
listed as carcinogens either under the state's Proposition 65 or under the federal Hazardous
Air Pollutants Program.
Following the identification of diesel particulate matter (DPM) as a TAC in 1998, CARB has
worked on developing strategies and regulations aimed at reducing the risk from DPM. The
overall strategy for achieving these reductions is found in the :Fisk Deduction Plan to
Deduce Particulate Flatter Emissions from L iesel-lam ueled Engines and Vehicles GARB
000 . A stated goal of the plan is to reduce the statewide cancer risk arising from exposure
to DPM by 85 percent by 2020.
In April 200 5, GARB published the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community
Health Perspective (CARR 005 . The handbook makes recommendations directed at
protecting sensitive land uses from air pollutant emissions while balancing a myriad of
other land use issues e.g., housing, transportation needs, economics, etc.). It notes that the
handbook is not regulatory or binding on local agencies and recognizes that application
takes a qualitative approach. As reflected in the CARB Handbook, there is currently no
adopted standard for the significance of health effects from mobile sources. Therefore, the
CARR has prodded guidelines for the siting of land uses near heavily traveled roadways.
Of pertinence to this study, the GARB guidelines indicate that siting new sensitive land
uses within Soo feet of a freeway or urban roads with 100,000 or more vehicles per day
should be avoided when possible.
As an ongoing process, GARB will continue to establish new programs and regulations for
the control of diesel particulate and other air-toxics emissions as appropriate. The
continued development and implementation of these programs and policies will ensure that
the public's exposure to IPI will continue to decline.
D Street Park Project
Page 1.1.
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 47 of 20
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
3.2.3 State Implementation Flan
The SIP is a collection of documents that set forth the state's strategies for achieving the
NAAQS. In California, the SII' is a compilation of neer and previously submitted plans,
programs (such as air quality management plans, monitoring, modeling, permitting, etc.),
district rules, state regulations, and federal controls. The CARP is the lead agency for all
purposes related to the SIP under federal law. Local air districts and ether agencies, such
as the Department of Pesticide Regulation and the Bureau of Automotive Repair, prepare
QIP elements and submit them to CARR for review and approval. The CARR then. forwards
SII revisions to the EPA for approval and publication in the Federal Register. All of the
items included in the California SIP are luted in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at
40 CFR 52.220.
The SDAPCD is responsible for preparing and implementing the portion of the SIP
applicable to the SDAR. The SIP plans for San Diego County specifically include the
Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the 1997 National ozone Standard for
San Diego County (2012), and the 2004 Revision to the California State Implementation
Plan for Carbon Monoxide—Updated Maintenance flan for Ten. Federal Planning Areas.
3.2.4 California Environmental Quality Act
Section 15 1 25(d) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines requires
discussion of any inconsistencies between the project and applicable general plans and
regional plans, including the applicable air duality attainment or maintenance plan (or
SIP).
3.3 San Diego fir Pollution Control District
The 'DAPCD is the agency that regulates air quality in the SDAR. The SDAPCD prepared
the Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAS) to address state requirements, pursuant to the
CCAA of 1988 (California H&SC §39000 et seq. . The CCAA requires areas that are
designated nonattainment of state ambient air duality standards for ozone, Co, Sot, or
NO2 to prepare and implement state plans to attain the standards by the earliest
practicable date (H&SC §40911(a)). With the exception of state ozone standards, each of
these standards has been attained in the SDA: (County of San Diego 201 6).
Included in the RAQ are the Transportation. Control Pleasures (TCMs) prepared by the
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAL) that control emissions from mobile
sources (County of San Diego 2016). The RAQ ' and TCM set forth the steps needed to
accomplish attainment of CAAQS for ozone. The most recent update of the RAQ,S and
corresponding TCMs were adopted in 2016.
The S APD has also established a set of rules and regulations initially adopted on
January 1, 1969, and periodically reviewed and updated. These rules and regulations are
available for review on the agency's website.
D Street Pari Project
Page 1.2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 48 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
3.3.1 Environmental Health 'Risk Criteria
In accordance with AB 2588, any new facility proposed that would have the potential to
emit toxic air contaminants would be required to assess air toric problems that would
result from the facility's emissions (County of San Diego olo), If air emissions from a
specific facility include toxic substances or exceed identified limits, the facility is required
by the S .APCD to provide information regarding emission inventories and health risk
assessments. If adverse health impacts exceeding public notification levels are identified,
the facility would provide public notice, and if the facility poses a potentially significant
public health risk, the facility must submit a risk reduction audit and plan to demonstrate
how the facility would reduce health risks. SDAPCD public notification thresholds are
specified by ,SDPACE Pule 1210. The public notification thresholds are:
i. Maximum incremental cancer risks equal to or greater than 10 in one million, or
ii. Cancer burden equal to or greater than 1.0, or
iii. Total acute non-cancer health hazard index equal to or greater than 1.0, or
iv. Total chronic non-cancer health hazard index equal to or greater than 1.0.
4.0 fBjnviSetting
4.1 Geogra� hie Setting
The project is located in the city of Chula Vista, about 2.5 miles east of the Pacific ocean.
The eastern portion of the SDAB is surrounded by mountains to the north, east, and south.
These mountains tend to restrict airflow and concentrate pollutants in the valleys and low-
lying areas below.
4.2 Climate
""alae project site, like the rest of Sari. Diego County, has a Mediterranean climate
characterized by warm, dry summers and mild, wet winters. Based on meteorological data
recorded at the Chula Vista Civic Center, which is approximately 0.8 mile east of the
project site, the local temperature range is relatively limited, with printer low temperatures
along the coast averaging about 45 degrees Fahrenheit ('F), and summer high
temperatures average about 72'F. The average annual precipitation is 9.7 inches, falling
primarily from December to March. Snowfall is infrequent (Western Regional Climate
Center [WRCC] 2
The dominant meteorological feature affecting the region is the Pacific High Pressure Zone,
which produces the prevailing westerly to northwesterly winds. These winds tend to blow
pollutants away from the coast toward the inland areas. Consequently, air quality near the
coast is ,generally better than what occurs at the base of the coastal mountain range.
Fluctuations in the strength and pattern of winds from the Pacific High Pressure Zone
D Street Park Project
Page 13
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 49 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
interacting with the daily local cycle produce periodic temperature inversions that influence
the dispersal or containment of air pollutants in the SDAB. Beneath the inversion layer
pollutants become "trapped" as their ability to disperse diminishes. The mixing depth is the
area under the inversion layer. Generally, the morning inversion layer is Lower than the
afternoon inversion layer. The greater differences between the morning and afternoon
mixing depths correspond to increased dispersion of pollutants int e atmosphere.
Throughout the year, the height of the temperature inversion in the afternoon varies
between approximately 1,500 and 2,500 feet above mean sea level. In winter, the morning
inversion layer is about Boo feet above mean sea Level. In summer, the morning inversion
layer is about 1,100 feet above mean sea level. 'Therefore, air quality generally tends to be
better in the winter than in the summer.
The prevailing westerly wind pattern is sometimes interrupted by regional "Santa Ana"
conditions. A Santa Ana occurs when a strong high pressure develops over the Nevada—
Utah area, and overcomes the prevailing westerly coastal winds, sending strong, steady,
hot, dry northeasterly winds over the mountains and out to sea. Strong Santa Ana winds
tend to blow pollutants out over the ocean, producing clear days. However, at the onset or
during breakdown of these conditions, or if the Santa Ana is weak, local air quality may be
adversely affected. In these cases, emissions from the South coast Air Basin to the north
are blown out over the ocean, and low pressure over Baja California draws this pollutant-
laden air mass southward. As the high pressure weakens, prevailing northwesterly winds
reassert themselves and send this cloud of contamination ashore in the SAB. When this
event occurs, the combination of transported and locally produced contaminants produce
the worst air quality measurements recorded in the basin.
493 Existing ,Air Quality
Air quality at a particular location is a function of the kinds, amounts, and dispersal rates
of pollutants being emitted into the air locally and throughout the basin. The major factors
affecting pollutant dispersion are wind speed and direction, the vertical dispersion of
pollutants (which is affected by inversions), and the local topography. Air quality is
commonly expressed as the number of days in which air pollution levels exceed state
standards set by the CARB or federal standards set by the U.S. EPA. The SDAPCD
maintains to air quality monitoring stations located throughout the greater San Diego
metropolitan region.. Air pollutant concentrations and meteorological information are
continuously recorded at these stations. Measurements are then used by scientists to help
forecast daily air pollution levels.
The nearest active monitoring station is the Chula Vista Monitoring Station, approximately
5.2 miles northwest of the project site. The Chula Vista Monitoring Station measures ozone,
NO2, PM1o, and. PM ,5. Table 2 provides a summary of measurements collected at the Chula
Nista Monitoring Station for the years 2014 through 2016.
D Street Pari Project
.page 14
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 50 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
Table 2
Air Quality Measurements at the Chula Vista Monitoring Station
Pollutant/Stan dard-- 2011, "7['7_'2 015, -- 2 016,
Ozone
Days state 1-hour standard Exceeded(0.09 ppm)
Days state8-hour standard Exceeded 0.07 M 1 0 0
Days Federal8-hour Standard Exceeded 0.07 m 1 0 0
Max. 1-hr m 0.093 0.088 0.073
Max 8-hr(ppm) 0.072 0.066 0.068
Nitrogen Dioxide
Days state 1-hour standard Exceeded(0.18 ppm)
Days Federal 1-hour Standard Exceeded 0.100 m 0 0 0
Max 1-hr n 0.055 0.049 0.054
.Annual Average m 0.011 0.010 0.00
P 10
Days state 24-hour Standard Exceeded(50 /M3) 0 0 0
Days Federal 24-deur Standard Exceeded(1 0 g/M3) 0 0 0
state Max Daily( g/M3) 39.0 45.0 48.0
state.Annual.Average g/M3) 23.4 19.8 21.8
Federal Max Daily( g/M3) 38.0 46.0 48.0
Federal A nnual Average /M3) 22.9, 19.7 21.6
PT"2�
Measured Days:Federal 4-hour standard Exceeded(3 /m3)
Max Daily /rn°3) 26.5 33.5 23.9
State Annual Average( /m3) 9.3 8.4 8.7
Federal Annual Average( /m ) 8.3 8.7
SOURCE GARB 2017
M=parts permillion; tg/n t�=micrograms per cubic meter
4.3.1 Ozone
Nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons (reactive organic gases [ROG]) are known as the chief
"precursors" of ozone. These compounds react in the presence of sunlight to produce ozone,.
which is the primary air pollution problem in the SDAB. Because sunlight plays such an
important role in its formation, ozone pollution or smog is mainly a concern during the
daytime in summer months. The SDAB is currently designated a federal and state non-
attainment area for ozone. During the past 25 years, San Diego had experienced a decline
in the number of days with unhealthy levels of ozone despite the region's growth in
population and vehicle miles traveled (County of San Diego 2013)
About half of smog-forming emissions come from automobiles. Population growth in San
Diego has resulted in a lame increase in the number of automobiles expelling ozone-
forming pollutants while operating on area roadways. In addition, the occasional transport
of smog-filled air from the South Coast Air Basin only adds to the S AB's ozone problem.
Stricter automobile emission controls, including more efficient automobile engines, have
played a large role in why ozone levels have steadily decreased.
In order to address adverse health effects due to prolonged exposure, the U.S. EPA phased
out the national 1-hour ozone standard and replaced it with the more protective -hour
ozone standard. The SDAB is currently a non-attainment area for the previous (1997)
D Street Pari Project
.page 15
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 51 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
national -hour standard, and is recommended as a non-attainment area for the revised
(2008) national -hour standard of 0.075 parts per million (ppm).
Not all of the ozone within the SDAB is derived from local sources. Under certain
meteorological conditions, such as during Santa Ana wind events, ozone and other
pollutants are transported from the Los Angeles Basin and combine with ozone formed from
local emission sources to produce elevated ozone levels in the SDA- .
Local agencies can control neither the source nor the transportation of pollutants from
outside the air basin. The SDAPCD's policy, therefore, has been to control local sources
effectively enough to reduce locally produced contamination to clean air standards. Through
the use of air pollution control measures outlined in the RAS!S, the SDAPCD has effectively
reduced ozone levels in the SDAB.
Actions that have been taken in the SDAB to reduce ozone concentrations include.
• Transportation control measures i vehicle travel and em ssi ons exceed
attainment demonstration levels. Transportation control measures are
strategies that will reduce transportation-related emissions by reducing vehicle use
or improving traffic flow.
• Enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program.. The smog
check program is overseen by the Bureau of Automotive Repair. The program
requires most vehicles to pass a smog test once every two years before registering in.
the state of California. The smog check program monitors the amount of pollutants
automobiles produce. one focus of the program is identifying "gross polluters," or
vehicles that exceed two tunes the allowable emissions for a particular model.
Regular maintenance and tune-ups, changing the oil, and checking tire inflation can
improve gas mileage and lower air pollutant emissions. It can also reduce traffic
congestion due to preventable breakdowns, further lowering emissions.
• Air Quality Improvement Program. This program, established by AB 118, is a
voluntary incentive program administered by the GARB to fund clean vehicle and
equipment projects, research on biofuels production and the air quality impacts of
alternative fuels, and workforce training.
4.3.2 Carbon Monoxide
The SDAB is classified as a state attainment area and as a federal maintenance area for
Co. Until 2003, no violations of the state standard for Co had been recorded in the SLA
since 1991, and no violations of the national standard had been recorded in the SDAB since
1989. The violations that took place in 2003 were likely the result of massive wildfires that
occurred throughout the county. No violations of the state or federal Co standards have
occurred since 2003.
Small-scale, localized concentrations of CO above the state and national standards have the
potential to occur at intersections with stagnation points such as those that occur on major
D Street Park Project
.page 16
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 52 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
highways and heavily traveled and congested roadways. Localized high concentrations of
Co are referred to as TO hot spots" and are a concern at congested intersections, where
automobile engines burn fuel less efficiently and their exhaust contains more Co.
4.3,.3 Particulate .utter
Particulate matter is a complex mixture of microscopic solid or liquid particles including
chemicals, soot, and dust. Anthropogenic sources of direct particulate emissions include
crushing or grinding operations, dust stirred up by vehicle traffic, and combustion sources
such as motor vehicles, power plants, wood burning, forest fires, agricultural burning, and
industrial processes. Additionally, indirect emissions may be formed when aerosols react
with compounds found in the atmosphere.
Health studies have shown a significant association between exposure to particulate matter
and premature death in people with heart or lung diseases. other important effects include
aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular disease, lung disease, decreased lung
function, asthma attacks, and certain cardiovascular problems such as heart attacks and
irregular heartbeat (U.S. EISA 2016).
As its properties vary based on the size of suspended particles, particulate matter is
generally categorized as PM10 or P 2.5.
4,33.1 PMlo
PMl o1 , occasionally referred to as "inhalable coarse particles," has an aerodynamic diameter
of about one-seventh of the diameter of a human hair. High concentrations of PMlo are
often found near roadways, construction, mining, or agricultural operations.
4.3.3.2 PM2.5
PM2. , occasionally referred to as "inhalable fine particles," has an aerodynamic diameter of
about one-thirtieth of the diameter of a human hair. PM2.5 is the main cause of haze in
manor parts of the United States. Federal standards applicable to P 2. were first adopted
in 1997.
4.3,A Other Criteria Pollutants
The national and state standards for NO2, oxides of sulfur (Sox), and the previous standard
for lead are being met in the SDAB, and the latest pollutant trends suggest that these
standards will not be exceeded in the foreseeable future. As discussed above, new standards
for these pollutants have been adopted and new designations for the SDAB will be
determined in the future. The SDAB is also in attainment of the state standards for vinyl
chloride, hydrogen sulfides, sulfates, and visibility-reducing particulates.
D Street Pari Project
Page 17
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 53 of 20
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
5.0 Thresholds of Significance
Thresholds used to evaluate potential impacts to air quality are based on applicable criteria
in the State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. The project would have a significant air quality
impact if it would:
1. Obstruct or conflict with the implementation of the RAQS;
2. Result in emissions that would violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation;
3. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which
theproject region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including the release of emissions which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors);
4. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentration including air toxics
such as diesel particulates; or
5. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people.
Emissions resulting from implementation of the project would be due primarily to
construction-generated emissions and traffic associated with daily operation. The City
evaluates a project's potential to violate an air quality standard, contribute to an existing or
projected air quality violation, or result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of a
criteria pollutant based on the quantitative emission thresholds established by the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). These significance thresholds define
emission levels below which a project would not have a significant impact on ambient air
quality. It should be noted that the use of these significance thresholds is conservative, as
the SCAQMD's significance thresholds are based on air quality in the South Coast Air
Basin; the South Coast Air Basin experiences some of the worst air quality conditions in the
nation and is designated a non-attainment area for PM1o, PM2,5, and ozone, with a
classification of extreme nonattainment for ozone, whereas the SDA B is attainment for
PM10, PM2,5 and is classified as marginal nonattainment under ozone. Project-related air
quality impacts estimated in this environmental analysis would be considered significant if
any of the applicable significance thresholds presented in Table 3, the City's Air Quality
Significance Thresholds, are exceeded.
D Street,Park Project
Page 18
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 54 of 208
I C O N Air Quality Analysis
Table
1 " a
�.
Construction Operation
o.lit .nt ('oun .s per,day �po� d� e day),
NOx 100 5
voc 75 55
PM10 150 150
PM2.5 55 55
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
sox 150 150
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
co 550 550
Lead
SOURCE: s A D 2015.
Nox=oxides of nitrogen;VOC--volatile organic
compounds;P 10 10-micron particulate matter;
PM2. = 10-micron particulate matter;
sox=oxides of sulfur; CO=carbon monoxide
In addition to a comparison with the quantitative thresholds for regional emissions in
Table 3, the project was evaluated for local air quality impacts, such as whether
concentrations of carbon monoxide that would exceed the NAA IS or CAAQS,, consistency
with assumptions of the San Diego RAQS, and potential odors impacts.
5.1 EHealth Risk Criteria.
The Environmental Element of the City's General Plan contains policies intended to
improve local air quality by minimizing the release of air pollutants and topic air
contaminants and limiting the exposure of people to such pollutants (City of Chula Vista
2015). Policy E 6.10 states:
The siting of neer sensitive receivers within Soo feet of highways resulting
from development or redevelopment projects shall require the preparation of
a health risk assessment as part of the CEQA review of the project.
Attendant health risks identified in the Health Disk Assessment (HRA) shall
be feasibly mitigated to the maximum extent practicable, in accordance with
CEA, in order to help ensure that applicable federal and state standards
are not exceeded.
The ISDAPC D does not specify thresholds for evaluating C EEA projects or for projects that
do not require a permit to operate e.g., non-stationary sources). In general, for permitted
projects, the SDAPCCD does not identify a significant impact if the potential health risks
from the project would not exceed the health risk public notification thresholds specified. by
'I APC D Rule 1210. Health risk public notification thresholds are discussed in Section
3.3.11. For the purposes of evaluating the potential health risks associated with the air
toxics addressed in this assessment, a significant impact would occur if the worst-case
incremental cancer risk is greater than or equal to 10 in one million, or if the worst-case
total acute or chronic health hazard index is greater than or equal to one.
D Street Park:Project
Page 1
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 55 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
6.0 Methodology and, Assumptions
Air emissions were calculated using California Emissions Estimator Model CalEEMod
2016.3.1 (California .Air Pollution Control officers .Association 2016). The Coal Mod
program is a tool used to estimate air emissions resulting from land development projects
based on California-specific emission factors. The model estimates mass emissions from two
basics sources: construction sources and operational sources (i.e., area and mobile sources).
Inputs to Cal Mod include such items as the air basin containing the project, land uses,
trip generation rates, trip lengths, vehicle fleet mix (percentage of autos, medium true.,.
etc.), trip destination (i.e., percent of'trips from home to work, etc.), duration of construction
phases, construction equipment usage, grading areas, season, and ambient temperature, as
well as other parameters. The Cal Mod output files contained. in Attachment 1 indicate
the specific outputs for each model run. Emissions of NO, Co, Soy, PM1 o, PM2. , and ROG
are calculated. emission factors are not available for lead., and consequently, lead emissions
are not calculated. The SDAB is currently in attainment of the Mate and federal lead
standards. Furthermore, fuel used in construction equipment and most other vehicles is not
leaded.
6*1 Construction-related Emissions
Construction-related activities are temporary, short-tem: sources of air emissions. Sources
of construction-related air emissions include;
* Fugitive dust from grading activities;
* Construction equipment exhaust; and
* C onstruction-related trips by workers and material-hauling trucks.
Construction-related pollutants result from dint raised during demolition and ,grading,
emissions from construction vehicles, and chemicals used during construction. Fugitive
dust emissions vary greatly during construction and are dependent on the amount and type
of activity, silt content of the soil, and the weather. vehicles moving over paved and
unpaved surfaces, demolition, excavation, earth movement, grading, and wind erosion from.
exposed surfaces are all sources of fugitive dint. Construction operations are subject to the
requirements established in Regulation 4, Rules 52, 54, and 55, of the SDAPCD"s rules and
regulations.
Heavy-duty construction equipment is usually diesel powered. In general, emissions from
diesel-powered equipment contain more No , Sox, and particulate matter than
gasoline-powered engines. However, diesel-powered engines generally produce less CO and
less ROG than do gasoline-powered engines. Standard construction equipment includes
backhoe loaders, rubber-tired dozers, excavators, graders, cranes, forklifts, rollers, paving
equipment, generator sets, welders, cement and mortar mixers, and air compressors.
Air emission estimates in CalEEMod are based on the duration of construction phases;
construction equipment type, quantity, and usage; grading area; season; and ambient
D Street Pari Project
.page 20
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 56 of 20
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
temperature, among other parameters. Project construction would occur in six stages:
demolition, site preparation, grading, drainage and utilities, construction, and paving.
Specific construction phasing and equipment parameters were developed by City staff and
are summarized in Table 4 below.
'Table 4
Construction Schedule and Equipment
Length
epower d Load Phase,, (Da Equ ment Hors' r,
............... ................. ..................... ...........
I D�ozer 247 O�.40
Demolition 5 days I Loader 203 O.36
I Excavator 158 0.38
lConcrete Saw 81 0.73
1 Dozer 247 0.40
Site Preparation 5 days 1 Excavator 158 o.38
1 Compactor 8 0.43
1 Dozer 247 0.40
Grading 12 days I Loader 203 O.36
1 Excavator 158 0.38
1 Compactor 8 0.43
1 Excavator 158 0.38
Drainage and Utilities 10 days 1 Backhoe 97 0.37
1 Loader 203 o.36
Construction 3 days 1 Forklift, 89 0.20
I Compactor 8 O.43
Paving 2 days I Paver 130 O.42
2 Paving Equipment 132 0.36
2 Rollers, 80 0.38
Construction emissions were modeled assuming construction would begin in January 2018
and is estimated to last approximately 2 months. Demolition debris from pavement removal
was estimated based on the depth and area of the segment of D Street that would be
removed. As the project site is flat, grading cut and fill soil would be balanced on-site.
Standard dust control measures would be implemented as a part of project construction in
accordance with SDAPCD rules and regulations. Fugitive dust emissions were calculated
using CalEEMod default values, and did not take into account the required dust control
measures. Thus, the emissions estimates are conservative.
6. ra ion r la . Emissions
P
Operation emissions are long term and include mobile and area sources. Sources of
operational emissions include:
• Vehicle trips generated by the project;
• Natural gas use for space and water heating,
0 Consumer products, and architectural coatings; and
• Landscaping equipment.
D Street,Park Project
Page 21
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 57 of 208
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
G _ G emissions from vehicles come from the combustion of fossil fuels in vehicle engines.
Mobile emissions are estimated. in. Cal Mod by first calculating trip rate, trip length, trip.
purpose (e.g., home to work, home to shop, home to other), and trip type percentages for
each land use type and quantity. Project trip generation rates were developed from the
Institute of ""transportation Engineers' Stn Edition. Trip Generation. Handbook, which
indicates that city parrs typically generate 1.89 weekday tripe per acre, 22.75 Saturday
trips per acre, and 16.74 Sunday trips per acre (Institute of Transportation Engineers
2012). Therefore, the project would generate up to 15 daily trips. Standard countywide trip
lengths for each trip type were used to determine total project vehicle miles traveled
(California Air Pollution Control officers Association 2016). The vehicle emission factors
and fleet mix used in CalE EMod are derived from CARB's .Emission Factors, 2014
(EMFAC2014) model and account for the effects of applicable regulations such as the
Advanced Clean. Cars Program.
The project is a city parr and would not include any space heating or water heating needs.
Operation of the project is not anticipated to involve natural gas use.
Area sources of emissions can include the use of hearths (fireplaces), consumer products,
architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. Where are no hearths or woodstoves
associated with they project. Use of consumer products and landscaping equipment is
estimated based on land use. Landscaping maintenance includes fuel combustion emission
from equipment such as lawn mowers, rototillers, shredders/grinders, blowers, trimmers,
chain saws, and hedge trimmers as well as air compressors, generators, and pumps.
Emission calculations take into account building area, equipment emission factors, and the
number of operational days (summer days).
6,93 Environmental Health Risk
The AERMOD dispersion model was used to calculate concentrations at the project site
associated with emissions of TACs from I-5. Surface and upper air meteorological data from
the Lindberg Field and Naval Air Station Miramar monitoring stations were used in the
AERMOD model. The high-end excess cancer risk was calculated based on guidance from
the office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA; 2015), using the 95th
percentile exposure assumptions for inhalation risks (CARB 0�15). The risks were
calculated based on. ' , 30, and 70 years of exposure for excess cancer risks and chronic non-
cancer hazards for ages ranging from the last trimester of birth through age 70.
One source of uncertainty in calculating exposures is the assumption that individuals
within a particular receptor population (or subpopulation.) will receive the sane intake
doses. variability in parameters such as absorption rates, breathing rates, body weight,
slain surface area., and frequency of exposure will exist even in a narrowly defined age group
or sensitive receptor subpopulation. This ranges of uncertainty and variability is difficult to.
assess. In this analysis, o HHA standard default factors representing the upper limit of
these exposure parameters will generally overestimate risks. "Thus, the risks reported in
this analysis represent an upper-bound of estimated risk.
D Street Pari Project
Page 22
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 58 of 20
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
6.3.1 Exposure Assessment
The purpose of the exposure assessment is to estimate the extent of public exposure to
emitted substances (oEHHA. 2015). Under the OEHHA and U.S. EPA guidance, risk
assessments for TACs consist of dispersion modeling of air toxic emissions to predict their
downwind concentrations at the ground level. The methodology uses the model results in
estimating potential health risks associated with exposure at the predicted concentrations.
The exposure assessment determines the quantities or concentrations of the risk agents
received by the potentially exposed populations and receptors. The exposure assessment's
emphasis is on calculating risk to maximally exposed individuals or small populations. This,
assessment is performed by determining the concentrations of chemicals, at a location of
interest and combining this information with the time that individuals or populations are
exposed to the chemicals.
According to the OEHHA guidelines, an inhalation pathway cancer risk analysis must be
evaluated for every health risk assessment (OEHHA. 2015). Exposure through inhalation is
a function of the breathing rate, the exposure frequency, and the concentration of a
substance in the air (OEHH.A 2015). For residential exposure, the breathing rates are
determined for specific age groups, so inhalation dose (Dose-air) is calculated for each of
these age groups: 3rd trimester of birth, 0 to less than 2 (0<2), 2 to less than 9 (2<9), 2 to
less than 16 ( <1 ), 16, to less than 30 (16<30), and 16 to 70 years of age.' These age-specific
groupings are used with the age-sensitivity factors for cancer risk assessment. A first tier
(Tier 1) evaluation uses the high-end point estimate (i.e., the 95th percentiles) breathing
rates for the inhalation.
Additionally, OEHHA has developed age-sensitivity factors (A,SF). ASFs are used to
account for the increased susceptibility of infants and children to carcinogens, as compared
to adults. The A calculation procedure includes the use of age-specific weighting factors
in calculating cancer risks from exposures of infants, children and adolescents, to reflect
their anticipated special sensitivity to carcinogens. o recommends weighting cancer
risk by a factor of 10 for exposures that occur from the third trimester of pregnancy to
2 years of age, and by a factor of 3 for exposures that occur from 2 years through 16 years of
age. An age sensitivity factor of'l is applied to all other age groups.
This analysis is considered to be conservative as the potential methods used tend to
overestimate rather than underestimate health risks. In addition, individuals are evaluated
under scenarios using the high-end point estimates for breathing rates. These higher
breathing rates result in incremental cancer risk estimates that represent the upper-range
of predictions, and, therefore, health risks, that may be associated with exposure to vehicles
emissions from 1-5. Furthermore, the toxicity values (i.e., the values for each chemical at
The D Street Park Project would develop a park within a residential neighborhood; OEHHA
guidance does not specify breathing rates for park uses. Guidance for residential exposure was
assessed as the D Street Park would in an exposed population that is most similar to the population
typical in a residential area (as compared to an occupational exposure).
D Street,Park Project
Page 23
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 59 of 208
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
which an adverse health risk is predicted) are designed to protect health with an adequate
'I P
margin of safety and are, theretore, conservative. Thus, the health risks calculated in this
analysis represent the upper-bound of risks rather than actual values for any specific
individual.
The vehicle emission factors used in the dispersion modeling and concentration estimates
are based on EMFAC2014 model. Therefore, the emission factors take into account
improvements in technology and rules for future emission reductions for on-road vehicles
that have been implemented by CA B, but do not, and cannot take into account any future
reductions that are proposed but not yet implemented. The methodology for calculating
emissions based on the freeway traffic mix and by various speeds was developed from the
California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) 2014 Emissions Factor Model (CT-
E1' 1FAC2o14 .
Based on the Caltrans' report, Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic on California State
Highways (2013), in the vicinity of the project, 3.92 percent of the traffic volumes on 1-5 are
trucks with more than two axels. The remaining vehicles are classified as automobiles with
two axels. This percentage of trucks was further broken down by type 1 and type 2 trucks
per the CT-EMFAC method, which resulted in a final vehicle classifications mix of 96.1
percent non-trucks, of which o.7 percent,were diesel fueled; 2.1 percent being in the Truck 1
category, of which 37.7 percent were diesel fueled; and 1.8 percent classified as, truck 2, of
which 93.6 percent were diesel fueled. The vehicle classification mix was used in developing
emission rates entered into, AEI MO to determine ground level PMw concentrations from
vehicle exhaust. To estimate potential incremental cancer risks and the potential for
adverse chronic non-cancer health hazards to exposures, the dose through inhalation in air
of "BACs was calculated for the inhalation pathway. The equation for dose through
inhalation (Dose-air) is as follows:
Dose-air = (Cai, x DBR x A x EF xJO-
where: O-Where:
Dose-air Chronic daily intake,, milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) body weight per day
Cain Ground-level concentration of TAC to which the receptor is exposed,
micro grams/cubic meter
DBR Daily breathing rate, normalized to body weight (liters per kilogram body
weight per day as listed in the Table 5.6 Point Estimates of Residential
Breathing Rates [OEHHA 2015]
A Inhalation absorption factor (OEHHA recommended factor of 1)
EF Exposure frequency, days/year; (OEH recommended factor of 0.96 for
resident and 0.68 for workers)
The 30-year residential exposure scenario is the recommended assessment scenario
identified in the OEHHA guidelines, with the 9- and 70-year exposures disclosing the low
and high end of risk. Exposure frequency and breathing rate represent worst-case values
for these exposure parameters. OEHHA guidelines recommend exposure frequency for
residential uses be assumed to be exposed for 24 hours per day, 359 days per year (7 days
esi
per week, 50 weeks, per year) and the worker exposure frequency be assumed to be 250 days
D Street,Park Project
Page 24
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 60 of 208
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
per year (5 days per week,, 50 weeks per year) for the exposure period. Exposure frequency
for the D Street Park would be assumed to be 250 days per year for the exposure period;
however, is also disclosed for a 350-day-per-year exposure scenario. The 95th percentile
breathing rate was used to calculate exposure to TACs for the purpose of calculating excess
cancer risk. For the purpose of calculating chronic and acute hazard index, the upperbound
breathing rate was used.
6.3,.2 Dose-',Response Assessment
The dose-response assessment is the process of characterizing the relationship between
exposure to an agent and incidence of an adverse health effect in exposed populations
(OEHHA 2015). The assessment involves establishing a toxicity value or criterion to use in
assessing potential health risk. The toxicity criterion, or health guidance value, for
carcinogens is the cancer potency factor that describes the potential risk of developing
cancer over a 70-year lifetime. It is assumed in cancer risk assessments that risk is directly
proportional to dose and that there is no threshold below which the risk of carcinogenesis is
null (OEHHA 2015). Cancer potency factors are typically expressed as an high end
probability of developing cancer assuming continuous lifetime exposure to a substance at, a
dose of one milligram per kilogram of body weight, and are expressed in units of inverse
dose as a potency slope [i.e., (mg/kg/day)-,]. The cancer potency factors in this assessment
have been recommended by OEHHA(OEHHA 2015).
Non-cancer health risks (chronic and acute) are characterized by comparing the exposure to
a concentration at or below a level where adverse effects are not likely to occur following
specified exposure conditions. These concentrations or doses are called Reference Exposure
Levels (RELs). As stated in the OEHHA guidance, it should be emphasized that exceeding
the REL does not necessarily indicate that an adverse health effect will occur. Unlike
cancer health effects, non-cancer health effects are generally assumed to have thresholds
for adverse effects. In other words, no injury from a pollutant will occur until exposure to
that pollutant has reached or exceeded a certain concentration (i.e., threshold). RELs, take
into account the exposure of sensitive populations and are thus intended to be health
protective. .A. Chronic REL is a level above which prolonged exposure may have an adverse
health effects. An Acute REL is a level set above the level at which short-term exposure
may have an adverse health effect. The Hazard Quotient (HQ) for a substance is calculated
as the exposure concentration divided by the REL.
6.3.3 Risk Characterization
Risk characterization is the final step of risk assessment. In this step, modeled
concentrations and exposure information, which are determined through the exposure
assessment, are combined with potency factors and RELs that are developed through the
dose-response assessment (ole A 2015). In this assessment, the health risk
characterization process involves integrating the exposure and the cancer potency factors to
estimate two levels of potential health effects: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic. The
following sections present the approach to calculating carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic
risks in this assessment.
D Street,Park Project
Page 25
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 61 of 208
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
6.3.3.x. Carcinogenic Risk Characterization Methodology
Carcinogenic risk characterization assumed that chemicals causing cancer do not have a
threshold (i.e.., a carcinogen produces a risk of causing cancer at any level of exposure). It
should be noted that people are exposed to numerous chemicals from natural and artificial
sources, and this background exposure may exceed the risk threshold considered to be
acceptable for a particular cancer-causing mechanism. Moreover, some people may be more
susceptible to cancer than others, which means that background levels of exposure may
already exceed the risk threshold values for those individuals and not for others that, are
equally exposed. Therefore, this assessment focuses on the incremental potential cancer
risk associated with exposure to emissions and does not account for natural background or
individual habits.
In assessing the carcinogenic effects resulting from exposures to environmental
contaminants, the inhalation cancer risk (Risk-inh , is calculated using the following
equation:
Risk-inh— (Dose-air x CPP x ASF x FT)
Where:
Risk-in h = Inhalation Cancer Risk
Dose-air = Chronic daily intake, mg/kg body weight per day
CPP Inhalation cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-i
(oEHHA recommended 1.1 (mg/kg-day)-u particulate matter from diesel-
fueled engines)
ASF Age Sensitivity Factor (OEHHA recommended 10 for ages 0-2, 3 for ages 2-
161 1 for ages 16-30)
FT Fraction of time spent at D ,Street Park (un tless)
Cancer risk is calculated by multiplying the inhalation dose by the inhalation cancer
potency factor to yield the potential inhalation excess cancer risk. The cancer risk is
expressed as the increased chance of contracting cancer during a 9-year, 30-year, and 70-
year exposure period for the age ranges of 0-9, 0-30, and 0-70. Each of these age groups also
include the third trimester of a fetus.
OEHHA guidelines recommend fraction of time spent at home be assumed to be between 17
and 21 hours of each day. The D Street Park is unlikely to accommodate any individual for
more than a few hours per day. As discussed previously, an exposure frequency of 250 days
per year is assumed for D Street Park. This analysis assumes that the average duration of
a visit would be 4 hours; however, it is also disclosed for the duration of a typical residential
exposure scenario.
6.3.3.2 Non-carcinogenic Risk. Character izat on Methodology
In this analysis, non-carcinogenic impacts are evaluated for chronic inhalation exposure.
Estimates of health impacts from non-carcinogenic concentrations are expressed as a HQ
D Street,Park Project
Page 26
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 62 of 208
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
for individual substances,, such as diesel particulate. An HQ of one or less indicates that
adverse health effects are not expected to result from exposure to emissions of that
substance. Reference exposure levels are defined as the concentration at which no adverse
health effects are anticipated. Generally, the inhalation pathway is the largest contributor
to the total dose. The HQ is calculated with the following equation:
Ground-Level Concentration (micrograms per cubic meter [Pg/m:3])/Reference Exposure
Level (pg/M3) = Hazard Quotient
7.0 Ail
itywr Assessment
uonstruction-related Emissions
Table 5 shows the total projected construction maximum daily emission levels for each
criteria pollutant. The CalEEMod output files for construction emissions are contained in
Attachment 1.
Table 5
Summary o�f Worst-case Construction Emissions
(pounds pier day)
Pollutant
Yeair' ROSOxCO, _SOx' PM'10'" ,PM, '2.;5..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..........
2018 2 23 15 >1 6 2
Maximum Daily Emissions 2 23 15 >1 6 2
Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
ROG reactive organic gas; NOx=oxides of nitrogen; CO =carbon monoxide;
SOx-oxides of sulfur; PMto- 10-,micron particulate matter; PM2.5- 2.5-,
I micron particulate matter
For assessing the significance of the air quality emissions resulting during construction of
the project, the construction emissions were compared to the significance thresholds shown
in Table 5. As shown, maximum daily construction emissions are projected to be less than
the applicable thresholds for all criteria pollutants.
792eration-related Emissions
P
Table 5 shows the total projected maximum daily emission levels during project operation
for each criteria pollutant. The CalEEMod output files for construction emissions are
contained in Attachment 1,
D Street,Park Project
Page 27
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 63 of 208
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
Table i6
Pr Ject oJ
OEmiissiions
(pounds
Pollutant
Source ROG ,, ,,,,NO � � P PM .5
Mobile Sources mor 1. 0.1 0.3 mor 1. 0.1 mor 1.
Energy Sources 0 0 0 0 0 0
Area Sources X0.1_ o X0.1_ o 0 0
Total X0.1_ 0.1. 0.3 X0.1_ 0.1. X0.1_
Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
-Exceeds 'Threshold? No No No No No No
TOTE: Totals may vary due to independent rounding.
ROG reactive organic 'as; Tox=oxides of nitrogen; CO carbon monoxide; Sox oxides of sulfur;
P to 10-micron particulate matter;P 2, .5-micron particulate matter
As shown, maximum daily construction emissions are projected to be less than the
applicable thresholds for all criteria pollutants.
1.3 Environmental .'"isk Assessment Results
7.3.1 Cancer Risk
The maximum excess cancer rises were predicted for a receptor located in the proposed
acture recreation area. Based on the dispersion modeling, which is shown on Figure 4, the
annual ground level concentration of DPM at this location would be approximately 0.04
1.1g/M3. Based on this concentration, maximum excess cancer rises for the 30-year exposure
scenario were estimated to be 4.2 in one million; 2.9 in one million for the -;dear exposure
scenario; and 5.0 in one million for the 70-gear scenario.. "thus, the incremental cancer rise
from IPM exposure at the active recreation area is anticipated to be below the 10 in one
million significance threshold for all scenarios. Modeling results are included in.
Attachment 2.
The project would include the development of a neighborhood pare.. Assumptions regarding
the exposure frequency and duration have been revised to reflect a worst-case scenario for
the maximally exposed individual receptor associated with a neighborhood pare. If health
rises were estimated following OEH --A's recommended exposure frequency and duration.
for residential uses, 17 to 21 hours per day for 350 days per year, the excess cancer rise
would be approximately 27.3 in one million for the 30-year exposure, 19.5 in one million for
the -year exposure, and 32.1 in one million for the 70-year exposure. This exposure would
not be anticipated to occur; however, it is included for disclosure.
D Street Pare.. Project
Page 28
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 64 of 20
Ima e B'ourc :N+arena ( o an Nuns (17)
N,
11 II��V i I I I
p�N yl
I
I
5�
YI
MII
1
;
! I I
'"I'�II mien
,
i I
ul
�I
N �,/ '.� J I r' �°�� lam',,,yl)' I dr✓/U% ��� Y,��f
o,
I
a,
„y
It�Ys
N
IV ren
Ir
Ili r 1
y.
a
,
I I'
I
�Y
I
u
II, I
r 1�
f
I
I, I
Ylu
Iv i
I
v.
1 I
r
II.
k ,
/
;� � � p% „i✓ I)J(I,%;;, ,/ I )� I III IIJ '� IIU' =r..
66I
s a
I
r II ! V uI v IYI W I n
fIV' '11111 I'` V v
w u� i/ I r
u
r
A.
r
I"�1' VI4 II ill' � °lulu .I�
"Vwl'rlu
I
ill
�
a
„,
I I I
�/, � %; r... '� rw✓D/{%�,,; ,�7%"� YJ ,,�:,,yr �,
r r I
/
I
y,ll up
ull�
tI,
�z" y �.y �,� n s f, , ,lr' „,. �' Y, 1 wn,V, /j��/�� (J •r,r,.
u
I I
4.
I
I I.
u�
M
I
� III
III I
I, I
I
I.
1
I I ;
�,I
I
/� i-'o) Iii//�� l y � 'rrr t1 r �„;, o' J/'%�,/,,;✓r
r�rir� i
Miru�' q�IIIIIj.
it
I
f I
I
{ I
�r ,r;� '�elf U � r %���.. ;j 1% �'" 11��', f��� ". %,/ ;u II•• ISI
/ 0 w/ °� VV viii YIi"VIII
r/ rr
or
I I
I I N
I
I I�
rIG VI
,
' I i
/
1-
rII
/
s ul
,"
r
r
i,
S
I
r II 91, 1
Ir
I I II I
c. 4i u
1 u',
I a
0
r ,
i
f�
u
i
M
I`II
/ s t
n
r ;
r ,
r 0 9 j I/� ' �I i I I ��'„ �I�v "y✓!` I//16 I`%�� / ,til f,
i l
rl a;-
/
I 16,
l i
' I
I
,.l
l9lf
r � I
li
/
I I
r
' � .r' ✓%�l/,I �I;, /�r; �. ,,,,I'�, ,. /"'�`w, "" ,r9�r,; l �UXlI� �, ff) i /.. ,� ,�,..
I
wllvl I iu'j ''''II' �r 1
I,.
I�
III
9,
/
t.
ill
I
I.Y.
II
I
i i r
/
I
II
IIY
4
ICcHIr �� f�riiil�i�ii„ j �r„ il,�� J�I'r;ry � ✓; �� , Vvy'"/
r
II
r V� i. I Y til
y r Iii {
V
�I
11
III
/
I'
i
�il IIII
u
6
s
7
ua
r.
I
4V" I
YI �
I
I,
�I Y.
S1.
I
lil, I
m.
p IhI
tl
I I
I, 4
r
t I
uI .t
I
J
All
I-
o,1� r � ,/J'�,: i�� /�,. ,,,P, ;I m r �r r ,;��. ,�' ri/%:,ry✓e,- 9l w �"i IJI; i r�,,,
j
Project Boundary o Feet 150
0
PM101 Ground Level Concentrations
0,02 p /mA 3
0,03 pg/MA 3
0.04 p /mA 3
0,05 p /mA 3
0.06 dug/M
0.07 pg/MA
0.08 pg/MA3 FIGURE 4
CON N
PM 10 Ground Level Concentrations
M:\JiOBS5'18819lccmmllcn_glis\fig4.mlxd 8114/2017 fmm
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 65 of 208
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
The following discussion of background risks is provided for informational purposes. Based
on the CARB's California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality — 2009 Edition (CARR
2009), the relative cancer risk attributable to diesel particulate emissions in San Diego
County was estimated at 420 in one million for the year 2000, which represents a
52 percent drop in excess cancer risks since 1990 ( Ali, 2009).. The reduction over time is
primarily attributed to regulatory requirements and technological developments that have
resulted in the reduction of toxics emitted in diesel exhaust. Based on the risk estimates,
the project results of 4.2 in one million excess cancer risk for the maximally exposed
individual receptor in comparison with the background risks within San Diego County, this
would contribute approximately 1.0 percent of the estimated existing risk to the overall
cumulative risk predicted in San Diego County.
7.3.2 Non-Cancer Risk
Based on an annual ground level concentration of 0.04 p. /m3, the chronic non-cancer risk
predicted at the project site was 0.008. This is below the level of 1.0 at which adverse non-
cancer health risks would be anticipated.
7.4 Impact A
1. Would the project obstruct or conflict with the implementation of the San Diego RAQS or
applicable portions of the QIP?
The CCAA requires areae that are designated as non-attainment of state ambient air
quality standards for ozone, Co, Sot, and NO2 to prepare and implement est plans to attain
the standards by the earliest practicable date. The SDAB is designated non-attainment for
the Mate ozone standard. Accordingly, the RAQS was developed to identify feasible
emission control measures and provide expeditious progress toward attaining the state
standards for ozone, PM1o, and PM ,5; however, the C CAA only requires, in this case, a plan
for ozone. The two pollutants addressed in the RAQS are ROG and NOx, which are
precursors to the formation of ozone. Projected increases in motor vehicle usage, population,.
and growth create challenges in controlling emissions and by extension to maintaining and
improving air quality. The RAQS, in conjunction with the transportation control measures,
were most recently adopted in 2016 as the air quality plan for the region.
The CARB mobile source emission projections and SANDAG growth projections are based
on population, vehicle trends and land use plans developed in general plans. As such,
projects that propose development that is consistent with the growth anticipated by
SANDAG's growth projections and/or the City's General Ilan would be consistent with the
RA+ S. In the event that a project would propose development that is less dense than
anticipated by the growth projections, the project would likewise be consistent with the
lAQS. In the event a project proposes development that is greater than anticipated in the
growth projections, further analysis would be warranted to determine if the project would
exceed the growth projections used in the RAS for the specific subregional area.
D Street Park Project
.page 30
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 66 of 20
R_ _EC0 N AirQuality Analysis
The project site is designated as Rl , i+d ntial-Mediu High) in the City's General
Plan. The project proposes a public park, which is a lower intensity land use than is typical
of the 1 ,I" H land use designation. thus, the project mould be consistent with the General
Plan land use designation and with the growth anticipated by the City's General Plan and
SANDAG. The project would therefore not result in an increase in emissions that are net
already accounted for in the RA S. Thus, the project would net interfere with
implementation of the RAQS or, gather air quality plana.
2. Would the project result in emissions that would violate any air quality, .standard or
contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation:?
As shown in "fables 5 and 6, air emissions associated with project construction and
operation would not exceed the applicable City significance thresholds. These thresholds
are designed to provide limits below which project emissions would not significantly change
regional air quality. Therefore, as project air emissions would be below these limits, the
project would not result in regional emissions exceeding the NAAQS or CAAQS or
contributing to existing violations. Impacts to air quality standards would be less than
significant.
`. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or
Mate ambient air quality standard (including release emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
The region is classified as attainment for all criterion pollutants except ozone, .+PMio, and
PM2. . The SDAB is non-attainment for the -dour federal and state ozone standards. ozone
is not emitted directly, but is a result of atmospheric activity on precursors. Nox and ROG
are known as the chief "precursors" of ozone. These compounds react in the presence of
sunlight to produce ozone.
As shown in Tables 5 and 6, emissions of ozone precursors ROG and. Nox), PM1o, and P 2.5
from construction and operation would be below the applicable thresholds. therefore, the
project would not generate emissions in quantities that would result in an exceedance of the
NAAQS or CAAQS for ozone, P14 1o, or PM2.5, and impacts would be less than significant.
The project could be developed concurrently with the adjacent 701 D Street Project. The
individual and cumulative emissions from both projects are summarized in Fable 7.
'Table
Construction
(pounds pier day)
lilutat
axi um Dari 4siohs ROS No Co SoX �'mf � .
y........m...............................................................:...... .....................:.................... ......... ..:..............
D Street Park Project 2 23.... 15 >1 6 2
701 D....Street....Project 61 55.... 42 >1 21 13....
Combined Emissions 78 57 >1 27 1.5
Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 5
oG reactive organic gas; Nox=oxides of nitrogen; CO =carbonmonoxide; Sox=oxides of
sulfur; PM1a 1.o-micron particulate matter; PM2. 2. -micron particulate matter
D Street Park Project
.page 31
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 67 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
4. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentration
including air toxics such as diesel particulates?
The tern "sensitive receptor" refers to a person in the population who is more susceptible to
health effects due to exposure to an air contaminant than the population at large or to a
land use that may reasonably be associated with such a person. Examples include
residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, churches, athletic facilities, retirement
homes, and long-term health care facilities.
Sensitive receptors in the project vicinity include multi-family developments to the east of
the project site and the Bayscene 1' obilehorme Park to the south of the project site.
Additionally, the 701 D Street Project would develop sensitive receptors to the north of the
project site. once complete, the project's outdoor recreation area would also be a sensitive
receptor.
Construction-related Emissions
Project construction equipment would generate diesel exhaust emissions. Diesel exhaust
has been identified by CARR as a carcinogen. Cancer risk is dependent on the exposure
concentration (dose) and duration of exposure.
Due to the short-terra nature of construction (approximately two months), project
construction is not anticipated to result in substantial cancer risk. Construction impacts to
sensitive receptors would be less than significant.
As exposure from diesel-fueled construction vehicles would e short-term i.e.,.
approximately two months), project construction equipment would not result in substantial
cancer risk.
Operation-related Emissions
The project proposes a community park. Community parks are not typically associated with
the emission of substantial pollutant concentrations. Additionally, as the project is not
anticipated to generate substantial traffic volumes, the project would not result in
substantial off-site emissions. operation impacts to sensitive receptors would be less than.
significant.
Park Exposure
The proposed active recreation area would be a sensitive receptor. The Air Toxics Risk
Evaluation conducted in this analysis was based on assumptions regarding emissions from
diesel-fueled truck traffic on I-5. To provide an estimate of emissions to estimate a -year,
30-gear, and 70-year exposure scenarios, emission rates were calculated from. the
Ell FAC2014 model. SAN AG year 2020 traffic volumes on I-5 were used in this analysis.
Based on the predicted ground level concentrations and assuming that the maximally
exposed individual receptor is preset 4 lours per day for 250 days per year, the excess
D Street Park Project
Page 32
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 68 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
cancer risk would be approximately 4.2 in one million and the non-cancer chronic risk
would be less than health hazard index. Thus, the potential increase in cancer risk and the
nen-cancer chronic risks would be less than significant.
If health risks were estimated following OEHHA's recommended exposure frequency and
duration for residential uses, 17 to 21 hours per day for 350 days per year, the excess cancer
risk would be approximately 27.3 in one million for the 30-year exposure, 19.5 in one
million for the -yeas exposure, and 32.1 in one million for the 70-yeas exposure. This
exposure would not be anticipated to occur; however, it is included for completeness of
disclosure.
5. Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ofpeople..
The project would involve the use of diesel-powered construction equipment. Diesel exhaust
may be noticeable temporarilat adjacent properties; however, construction activities
would be temporary. The project does not include industrial or agricultural uses that are
typically associated with objectionable odors. Therefore, this impact would be less than
significant.
8.0 Conclusions
""alae primary goal of the RAQS is to reduce ozone precursor emissions. The project site is
designated as RMH (Residential-Medium, High) land use in the City's General Ilan. The
project proposes a public park, which is a lower intensity land use than is typical of the
R H land use designation. Because the project would be consistent with the City's General
Plan land use designation, the project would be consistent with the growth anticipated by
the City's General Plan and " l DAG. The proposed project would, therefore, not result in
an increase in emissions that are not already accounted for in the RA S. "thus, the project
would not interfere with implementation of'the RAQS or other air quality plans.
As shown in. 'fables 5 and e , emissions associated with construction and operation of the
project would not exceed the applicable City significance thresholds. "cheese thresholds are
designed to provide limits below which project emissions would not significantly change
regional air quality. Therefore, as project emissions would be well below these limits,
project construction would not result in regional emissions that would exceed NAAQS or
CAAQS or contribute to existing violations. Impacts to regional air quality would be less
than significant.
The evaluation conducted in this Air "Toxics Fisk Evaluation was based on assumptions
regarding emissions from diesel-fueled truck traffic on I-5. To provide an estimate of
emissions to estimate a. 9-year, 30-yeas, and70-year exposure scenarios, emission rates
were calculated from the ET"FAC 014 model. SAN AG year 2020 traffic volumes on I-,
were used in this analysis. Based on the predicted ground level concentrations, the excess
cancer risk would be approximately 4.2 in one million and the non-cancer chronic risk
would be less than significant. The excess cancer risk would be below the 10 in one million
significance threshold.
D Street Park Project
.page 33
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 69 of 20
R_ _EC0 N Air Quality Analysis
It should be noted that the variability in parameters such as absorption rates, breathing
rate, body weight, frequency of exposure, and fraction of time spent at D Street Park exist
even in a narrowly defined age group or sensitive receptor subpopulation. This creates a
level of uncertainty in calculating exposures and associated rises for individuals within a
particular receptor population that presumably would receive the same intake doses. For
this analysis the OEHHA standard default factors, which represent the upper limit of these
exposure parameters, generally overestimates risks. Assumptions regarding the exposure
frequency and duration have been revised to reflect a worst-case scenario for the maximally
exposed individual receptor associated with a neighborhood parr..
The project does not include industrial or agricultural uses that are typically associated
with objectionable odors. The project would involve the use of diesel-powered construction
equipment. Diesel exhaust may be noticeable temporarily at adjacent properties however,
construction activities would be temporary. Therefore, this impact would be less than
significant.
9.0 References
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
2010 California Emissions Estimator Model CalEEMod). User's Guide Version
2010.3.1 September.
California Air Resources Board ARB
2000 Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled
Engines and Vehicles. California Air Resources Board. Stationary Source Division,
Mobile Source Control Division. October.
2005 .Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community health Perspective.
California Air resources Board. April.
2009 The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality - 2009 Edition.
2015 2014 Efission. PA "tors EMFA ` model, version 1.07, update March 15.
2010 Ambient Air Quality Standards. California Air resources Board. May 4.
2017 California ,Air Quality Data Statistics. California Air Resources Board Internet
Site. http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/welcome.h.tml. Top 4 Summary and Hourly
Listing. Accessed August 8, 2017.
Chula Vista, City of
2015 Chula Vista General Plan Vision 2020, Amended October.
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
2012 Trip Generation Handbook. '9th :edition..
D Street Parr Project
Page 34
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, gage 70 of 20
R_ _E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
,San Diego, County of
2013 Air Quality in San Diego County. 2013 Annual Report. San Diego Air Pollution
Control District.
2016 2016 Revision of the Regional Air Quality Strategy for San Diego County,
Available at http://www.sdapcd.org/content/dam/sdc/apcd/PDF/Air�/`20Quality�`20
Planning/2016%20RAQS.pdf
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
2015 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Handbook. March.
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Asses sment(O EHHA)
2015 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Risk
Assessments (Guidance Manual), February.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
2016 Criteria Air Pollutants, Particulate Matter. Accessed at
https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/index.html. Last updated
February 23.
Western Regional Climate Center
2016 Western U.S. Climate Historical Summaries: Chula Vista, California (041758).
Last updated May 31.
D Street,Park Project
Page 35
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 71 of 208
Ru C C)N Air Quality Analysis
ATTACHMENTS
D Street,Park Project
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 72 of 208
Ru C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
ATTACHMENT 1
CaIEEMod Output - Project Emissions
D Street,Park Project
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 73 of 208
Summary Book
Air Quality
Air Quality Emissions Estimate, Pollutant,(Ibs/day)
ROCPM10 NOx CO IS02 PM2.5
Construction 2 23 15 01 6 2
Summer Area 0 0 0 0 0 0
Enor 0 0 0 01 0 0
Mobile 0 0 0 0 0 0
Construction 2 23 15 01 6 2
Area 0 0 0 0 0 0
Winter Ener 2y........................ 0 1 0 0 01 0 0
Mobile 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Unmitigated Air Quality Emissions Estimate PoIlutant(lbs/day) �PM10
RONCS O0 S
x C 02 PM
Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 2 23 15 0 6 2
Maximum Dail Operation Emissions 0 0 0 0 0 01
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 74 of 208
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod,.2016-3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/11/2017 12:04 RM
D Street Park Project- San Diego County, Summer
D Street Park Project
San Diego County, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric ot Acreage IFloor Surface Area Population
City Park 0.,64 Acre 0.64 27,878.40 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq(Days) 40
Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2018
Utility Company San Diego Gas&Electric
CO2 Intensity 720.49 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr) (1b[MWhr) ([b/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-,Default Data
Construction Phase- Estimated construction schedule; Standard work week, Monday-Friday 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Off-road Equipment- Estimated Equipment.
Demolition - D Street is estimted to have -inches of concrete across the entire 0.66 acre site approximately 14,500 cubic feet; assuming 145 lbs/cf,
approximately 1,050 tons.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionRhase NumDays 100.00 3.00
tblConstructionFhase NumDays 10-00 5.00
.7Value
00
.00
tblConstructionRhase NumDays 2.00 12.00
tblConstructionFhase NumDays 5.00 2.00
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 75 0f 208
tbl Construction Rhase NumDays 1.00 5.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 2.50 0.64
tblOffRoad Equipment Off Road Equ ipmentUnitAmou�nt 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00
tblOffRoad Equipment Off Road Equ ipmentUnitAmou�nt 2.00 1.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum D�ail�y Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG N�Ox Gol S02 Fugitive Exhalust PM10 Fugitive Exhalust PM�2.,5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 To�tal CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
RM10 PM10 Total PM�2.5 PM�2.5 To�tal
Year �lb/d�ay �l�b/d�ay
2018 1.9000 22.5338 15.1589 0.0390 5.0201 0.91643 5.86017 0.8170 0.9093 1.6126 0.0000 4,019.344 4,019.3444 0.6743 0.0000 4,036.201
4 8
Maximum 1.9000 22.5338 15.1589 0.03�9�O 5.0201 0.9643 5.860�7 0.8170 0.9093 1.6126, 0.0000 4,019.344 4,019.3444 0.6743 0.0000 4,036.201
4 8
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx Gol S102 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio�-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
�������11111111111111 � 111111111111111111
Year �lb/day lb/day
2018 1.9000 22-5338 15-1589 0.03910 5.0201 0.9643 5.86017 0.8170 0.9093 1.6126 0.0000 4,019-344 4,019-3444 0.6743 0.0000 4,036.201
4 8
Maximum 1.9000 22.5338 15-1589 0.039�O 5.0201 0.9643 5.86017 0.8170 0.9093 1.6126 0.0000 4,019.344 4,019.3444 0.6743 0.0000 4,,036.201
E IE: 4 8
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 76 of 208
ROG: NOx, CO S02 �Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fuglitive Exhaust PM2.5 EBiiio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
pm10 PWO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01.010, 0.00 0.00 01.00 01.00 01.00 0.00 01.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG N�Ox Go, S02 Fugitive Ekhalust PM10 Fugitive Ekhalust PM�2.,5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 TotalCO2 CH4 �N20 CO2q__
RM10 PIV110 Total PIV12.5 PIV12.5 Total
Category �lb/d�ay lb/day
Area 1.4400e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0�000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.50OOe-
003 005 004 004 004
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0�000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mobile 0.0296 0.1111 0.3104 8.70OOe- 0.0�6,59 1.00OOe- 01.0669 0.0176 9.50OOe- 0.0186 88.3000 88.3000 5.20OOe- 88.4300
004 003 004 003
Total 0.0310 0.1111 0.3105 8.7000e- 0.0659 1.00OOe- O�.0669 0.0176 9.50OOe- 0.0186, 88.3002 88.3002 5.2000e- 0.0000 88.4301
E 004 003 004 003
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx Go, S02 Fugitive Ekhaiust PM10 Fugitive Ekhaiust PIM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio�-0O2 TotalCO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
�������11111111111111 � 111111111111111111
Category �lb/day lb/day
Area 1.4400e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 01-00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.5,000e-
003 005 004 004 004
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mobile 0.0296 0.1111 0.3104 8.70OOe- 0.0659, 1.00OOe- 0.0669 0.0176 9.50OOe- 0.0186 88-3000 88-3000 5.20OOe- 88.4300
004 003 004 003
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 77 of 208
Total 0.0310 0.1111 0.3105 8.7000e- 0.0659 1.00OOe- 01-01669 0.0176 9.50OOe- 0.0186 88-3002 88-3002 5.20OOe- 0.0000 88.4301
E 004 003 004 E 003 =1
�ROG NOx co S02 Fu�gitive Exhaust RM10 Fu�gitive Exhaust P�M2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 TotalICO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
PWO PWO Total MIS PM�21.5 Total
M2*5 EBio-C01 02e]
otal
0.00 0.00 0.00
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01.010, 0.00 0.00 01.010, 01.010, 0.00 01.00 01.00 01.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date N�um Days N�um Days Phase Description
Number I I E E I Week I I I
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2018 1/5/2018 5 5
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/6/2018 1/12/2018 5 5
3 Grading Grading 1/13/2018 1/30/2018 5 12
4 Drainage and Utilities Trenching 1/31/2018 2/13/2018 5 10
5 Construction Building Construction 2/14/2018 2/16/2018 5 3
6 Paving Paving 2/17/2018 2/20/2018 5 2
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.64
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad EquipmentType, Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 8,1 0.73
Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Loaders 1 8.00 203 0.36
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 78 of 208
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 9�7 0.37
Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Loaders 1 8.00 203 0.36
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 917 0.37
Drainage and Utilities Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Drainage and Utilities Rubber Tired Loaders 1 8.00 203 0.36
Drainage and Utilities Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29,
Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 917 0.37
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43
Paving Ro�llers 2 7.00 8�O 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 917 0.37
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling
Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Vehicle
Class Class,
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 104.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 4 10-00 0.00 0.00 10-80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
Grading 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
Drainage and Utilities 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10-80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
Construction 4 12.00 5.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 79 of 208
Paving 11 28.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LID-Mix HDT-Mix HKIDT
11 Mitigation Measures Construction
3.2 Demolition - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 No-CO2 N�Bio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 otal
,Categ�ory lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5499 01.00,010, 4.5499 01.6890, 01.00,010, 0.6890 0.0000 0.,0000
Off-Road 1.5837 15.8780 11.0348 0.0211 01.8138 0.8138 01.77010, 0.7700 2,083.215 2,083.2158 0.5099 2,095.,963
8 7
Totall 1.5837' 15.87'80 11.03�48 0.0211 4.5499 O�.8138 5,.3636 O�.6890 O�.770�O 1.4590 2,083.215 2,083.2158 0.5099 2,095.963
------------1 1 8 m 7
Unmitiq �ted Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio,-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM1 01 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 otal
,Categ�ory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.19,04 6.6 159, 1.3645 0.0167 0.3635 01.0260, 0.3895 01.0996 01.0249 0.1245 1,819.489 1,819.4895 0.1604 1,823.499
5 2
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 01-00,010, 0.0000 01-00,010, 01-00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0553 0.03919, 0.4450 1.1 700e- 0.1068 7.701010,e- 0.1076 01.0283 7.1 010101e- 0.0290 116-6392 116-6392 3.99OOe- 116.7390
003 01014 01014 003
Totall 0.2457' 6.6558, 1.8,09�5 0.0179 0.4703 01.0268 0.4971 01.1279 01.0256 0.1536 1,936-128 1,936-1286 0.1644 1,94,0.238
1 6 L 2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,0 of 208
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 No-CO2 N�Bio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 otal
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5499 01.00,010, 4.5499 01.6890, 01.00,010, 0,6890 0,0000 0.,0000
Off-Road 1.5837 15.8780 11.0348 0.0211 01.8138 0.8138 01.77010, 0,7700 0,0000 2,083,215 2,083,2158 0.5099 2,,095.,963
8 7
Totall 1.5837' 15.87'80 11.03�48 0.0211 4.5499 O�.8138 5,.3636 O�.6890 O�.770�O 1.4590 0.0000 2,083.215 2,083.2158 0.5099 2,095.963
8 m 7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 No-CO2 N�Bio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PIM10 Total P,M2.5 P,M2.5 otal
,Categ�ory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.19,04 6.6 159, 1.3645 0.0167 0.3635 01.0260, 0.3895 01.0996 01.0249 0.1245 1,819.489 1,819.4895 0.1604 1,823.499
5 2
Vendor 0.0000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0553 0.03919, 0.4450 1.1 700e-, 0.1068 7.701010,e- 0.1076 01.0283 7.1 010101e- 0.0290 116.6392 116.6392 3.9900e- 116.7390
003 01014 01014 003
Totall 0.2457 6.6558 1.809�5 0.0179 0.4703 O�.0268 0.4971 O�.1279 O�.0256 0.1536]E 1,936.128 1,936.1286 0.1644 11,940.238
6 2
33 Site Preparation - 2018
Unmitiq �ted Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �P,M2.5 Bio,-0O2 NBio-0O2 TotalCO2 GH4 N20, CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 otal
E: I ����������� I m
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,1 of 208
Category lb/day I lb/day
�Fugitive Dust 0.8885 0.0000 0.8885 O�.4284 0.0000 0.4284 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.2207 14.4231 8.0�741 0.0160 O�.6445 0.6445 O�.5929 0.5929 1,609.818 1,609.8180 0.5012 1,622.347
0 0
Total O�.6445 1.5330 O�.4284
1.2207' 14.4231 8.07'41 0.0160 0.8885 O�.5929 1.0214 1,609.818 1,609.8180 0.5012 1,622.347
0 0
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0426, 0.0307 0.3,423 9�.00OOe- 0.0822 5.90OOe- 0.0827 0.0218 5.50OOe- OM23 897225 897225 3.07OOe- 89.7992
004 004 004 003
Total 0.0426 0.03,07 0.3423, 9.00OOe- 0.0822 5.9000e- 0.0827 01.0218 5.5000e- 0.0223 89.7225 89.7225 3.0700e- 89.7992
1 004 O�04 O�04 003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.8885 01.00,010, 0.8885 01.4284 01.00,010, 0A284 0M00 0.0000
Off-Ro�ad 1.2207 14.4231 8.0741 0.0160 01.6445 0.6445 01.5929 O�5929 0M00 1,609�818 1,609�8180 0.5012 1,,622.347
0 0
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,2 of 208
7 Total 1.2207' 14.4231 8.07'41 0.0160 0.8885 0.6445 1.5330 O�.4284 O�.5929 1.0214 O�.0000 1,609-818 1,609-8180 0.5012 1,622-347
1 0 0
MItigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0426 0.0307 0.3,423 9�.00OOe- 0.0822 5.90OOe- 0.0827 0.0218 5.50OOe- 0,0223 89,7225 89,7225 3,07OOe- 89.7992
004 004 004 003
Total 0.0426 0.03,07 0.3423, 9.00OOe- 0.0822 5.9010,0e- 0.0827 01.0218 5.5010,0e- 0.022 89.72 e-
004 O�O�4 O�O�4 003
3.41 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM1 0 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Rio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0A138 0M00 0.0000
Off-Ro�ad 1.8233 18�.1016 12.9979, 0.0239 01.9633 0.9633 01.90,83 O�9083 2,352277 2,3522772 0.5865 2,,366.940
2 3
Total 1.8�233 18.1016 12.919,79, 0.0239 0.7528 O�.9633 1.7160 O�.4138 O�.90�83 1.3221 2,352.277 2,352.2772 0.5865 2,366.940
1 2 3
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,3 of 208
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Cate
gory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0�766 0.0�552 0.6162 1.6200e- 0.1479 1.06010,e- 0.1489 01.0392 9.801010,e- 0.0402 161.5004 161.5004 5.53OOe- 161.6386
003 01013 01014 003
Total 0.0766 0.0552 0.6162 1.6200e- 0.1479 1.060,0e- 0.1489 01.0392 9.8010,0e- 0.040 161.50 e-
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�4 003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0A138 0M00 0.0000
Off-Road 1.8233, 18.1016, 12.99,79 0.0239 0.9633 0.9633 0.9083 O�9083 0M00 2,352277 2,3522772 0.5865 2,366.940
2 3
Total 1.8233 18.1016 12.919,79, 0.0239 0.7528 01.9633 1.7160 01.4138 01.90,83 1.3221 0.0000 2,352.277 2,352.2772 0.5865 2,366.940
1 2 3
Mitinated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Rio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
FCategory lb/day lb/day
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,4 of 208
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0�766 0.0�552 0.6162 1.6200e- 0.1479 1.060�O�e- 0.1489 O�.0392 9.80�O�O�e- 0.0402 161.5004 161.5004 5.53OOe- 161.6386
003 O�O�3 O�O�4 003
Total 0.07'66 0.0552 0.6162 1.6200e- 0.1479 1.0�60�O�e- 0.1489 O�.O�392 9.80�O�O�e- O�.040 161.50 e-
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�4 003
15 Drainage and Utilities - 20,18
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Off-Road 0.9518 10.7218 7.0557 0.0141 0.4938 0.4938 0.4543 0,4543 1,422,126 1,422,1265 0.4427 1,433.194
5 7
Total 0.9518 10.7218 7'.0557 0.0141 01.4938 0.4938 01.4543 0.4543 1,422.126 1,422.1265 0.4427 1,433.194
1 1 5 7
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM1 0 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Rio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Cate
gory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0M00 0M00 0M00 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0M00 0M00 0M00 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0341 0.0245 0.2739, 7.20OOe- 0.0657 4.701010,e- 0.0662 01.0174 4.401010,e- 0�01179 71.7780 71.7780 2.46OOe- 71.8394
004 01014 01014 003
Total 0.0341 0.0245 0.273,91 7.20OOe- 0.0657 4.7000e- 0.0662 O�.01 74 4.4000e- 0.0179 71.7780 71.7780 2.4600e- 71.8394
1 004 01014 01014 003
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,5 of 208
MItigated Construction On-SlIte
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Off-Road 0.9518 10.7218 7.0�557 0.0141 O�.4938 0.4938 O�.4543 0.4543 0.0000 1,422.126 1,422.1265 0.4427 1,433.194
5 7
Total 0.9518 10.7218 7'.0557 0.0141 O�.4938 0.4938 O�.4543 0.4543 0.0000 1,422.126 1,422.1265 0.4427 1,433.194
1 1 5 7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM1 0 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0M00 0M00 0M00 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0M00 0M00 0M00 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0341 0.0245 0.2739, 7.20OOe- 0.0657 4.70OOe- 0.0662 0.0174 4.40OOe- O�0179 71.7780 71.7780 2.46OOe- 71.8394
004 004 004 003
Total 0.0341 0.0245 0.273,91 7.20OOe- 0.0657 4.7000e- 0.0662 O�.01 74 4.4000e- 0.0179 71.7780 71.7780 2.4600e- 71.8394
1 004 01014 01014 003
3.6 Construction - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,6 of 208
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugifive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �P,M2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9512 9�.8507 6.8428 0.0102 01.6145 0.6145 01.5653 0.5653 1,031.191 1,031.1916 0.3210 1,039.217
6 2
Total 0.9512 9.8,507' 6.8,428, 0.0102 01.6145 0.6145 01.5653 01.5653 1,031.191 1,031.1916 0.3210 1,039.217
1 6 2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Tota1CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
CEateg�o lb/day lb/day
ry
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
I
Vendor 0.0258 0.6588 0.1745 1.3,91OOe- 0.0339 5.15OOe- 0.0390 9.74OOe- 4.93OOe- O�0147 149�0949 149�0949 0.0118 149.3904
003 003 003 003
Worker 0.0511 0.0368 0.4108 1.08,00e- 0.0986 7.1 OOOe- 0.0993 0.0262 6.50OOe- 0M68 107�6670 107.6670 3.68OOe- 107.7591
003 004 004 003
Total 0.0769, 0.69,56 0.5852 2.47OOe- 0.1324 5.86010e- 0.1383 01.0359 5.58010e- 0.0415 256.7619 256.7619 0.0155 257.1494
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day lb/day
gor
off_
Off-Ro�ad 0.9512 9�.8507 6.8428 0.0102 01.6145 0.6145 01.5653 O�5653 0M00 1,031191 1,0311916 0.3210 1,,039.2
6 2 ]
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,7 of 208
7 Total 0.9512 9.8,507' 6.8,428, 0.0102 0.6145 0.6145 0.5653 O�.5653 0.0000 1,031-191 1,031-1916 0.3210 1,039.217
1 6 2
MItigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Tota1CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0258 0.6588 0.1745 1.3,91OOe- 0.0339 5.15OOe- 0.0390 9.74OOe- 4.93OOe- 0,0147 149,0949 149,0949 0.0118 149.3904
003 003 003 003
Worker 0.0511 0.0368 0.4108 1.08,00e- 0.0986 7.1 OOOe- 0.0993 0.0262 6.50OOe- 0,0268 107,6670 107,6670 3,68OOe- 107.7591
003 004 004 003
Total 0.0769, 0.6956 0.5852 2.47OOe- 0.1324 5.860,0e- 0.1383 01.0359 5.580,0e- 0.0415 256.7619 256.7619 0.0155 257.1494
003 O�O�3 O�O�3
3.71 Paving - 20,18
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM1 0 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Rio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Ro�ad 1.6615 16.4949, 14.2003 0.0222 01.9311 0.9311 01.86019 OM09 2,155�545 2,155�5450 0.6325 2,,171.356
0 3
Paving 0.0�000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 0M00 0M00 0.0000
Total 1.6615 16.49,49, 14.2003 0.0222 O�.9311 0.9311 O�.860�9 0.8609 2,155.545 2,155.5450 0.6325 2,171.356
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 3
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,8 of 208
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Cate
gory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.1192 0.0�858 0.9585 2.52OOe- 0.2300 1.66010,e- 0.2317 01.0610, 1.53010,e- 0.0625 251.2229 251.2229 8.60OOe- 251.4378
003 01013 01013 003
Total 0.11912 0.0858 0.91585 2.52OOe- 0.2300 1.660,0e- 0.23117 01.0610 1.530,0e- 0.062 251.22 e-
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�3 003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Off-Road 1.6,6,15 16.49,49 14.2003 0.0222 0.9311 0.9311 0.8609 0M09 0M00 2,155�545 2,155�5450 0.6325 2,171.356
0 3
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0M00 0M00 0.0000
Total 1.6615 16.4949, 14.2003 0.0222 01.9311 0.9311 01.86019 0.8609 0.0000 2,155.545 2,155.5450 0.6325 2,171.356
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 3
Mitinated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 TotaICO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
FCategory lb/day lb/day
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 8,9 of 208
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.1192 0.0�858 0.9585 2.52OOe- 0.2300 1.660�O�e- 0.2317 O�.0610 1.530�O�e- 0.0625 251.2229 251.2229 8.60OOe- 251.4378
003 O�O�3 O�O�3 003
Total 0.1192 0.0858, 0.9585 2.52OOe- 0.2300 1.660�O�e- 0.2317 O�.O�61 0 1.530�O�e- O�.062 251.22 e-
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�3 003
4.,0 Operational Detail - Mo�bile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhau�st PM10 �Flugitive Exhau�st �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Categ�ory lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.0296, 0.1111 0.3,104 8.70OOe- 0.0659 1.00OOe- 0.0669 0.0176 9.50OOe- O�0186 883000 883000 5.20OOe- 88.4300
004 003 004 003 1
Unmitigated 0.0296, 0.1111 0.3,104 8.70OOe- 0.0659 1.00OOe- 0.0669 0.0176 9.50OOe- O�0186 883000 883000 5.20OOe- 88.4300
004 003 004 003
4.2 'Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip�Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VIVIT Annual VMT
City Park 1.21 14.56 10.71 9,552 9,552
Total 1.21 1 14-56 10.71 9,552 97552
43 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip% Trip Purpose%
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C I H-0 or C-NW H-W or C- I H-S,or C-C, =H-O or:C-:NW Primary Diverted =P=ass-by::
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 90 of 208
City Park 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 66, 28 6
4.4 Fleet Mix
F::7Land�Use LDA �LDT1 �LDT2 MDV LHD1 LH�D2 MH�D HHD OBUS UBU�S M�CY SBUS MH
City
Park 0.574135 0.045525 0.189369 0.1165,19 0.019283 0.005,646 0.014833 0.022073 0.001871 0.002173 0.006385 O�.O�0073,9 0.001452
5.0 �Energy Detail
.11
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-0O2 N�Bio-0O2 TotalCO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PIM10 Total P,M2.5 P,M2.5 otal
M
,Categ�ory lb/day I lb/day CO2e
0.0000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NaturalGas 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
NaturalGas 0.0000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
5.2 Energy by Land Use 1- NaturalGas
Unmitiq �ted
NaturalGa ROG NOx GO S102 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �P,M2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio�-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 �P,M2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb�/day
Us
C City
ity Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00001
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 91 of 208
7 To 0.00
�tal 1 00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 01-010,010, 0.0000 01-0000 01-OOOOE 0.0000 01.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Witigated
NaturalGa RO�G NO�x CO SO�2, Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4, �N20 CO2e
s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM�2.5 �PM2.5 Total
BTU/yr
Land Use k lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 01.00,010 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
o.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitig�ation �Measures Area
ROG NOx GO, S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PIM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio�-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
�������11111111111111 � 111111111111111111
Category �lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.4400e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 01-00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.5,000e-
003 005 004 004 004
Unmitigated 1.4400e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.5,000e-
003 005 004 004 004
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 92 of 208
a.2 Area by SubCatego�ry
Unmitigated
RO�G N�Ox CO SO�2, Fugitive Exhaiust PM10 Fugitive Exhalust PM�2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
RM10 PM10 Total PM�2.5 PM�2.5 Total
SubCategory �lb/day lb/day
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
Consumer 1.4400e- 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products 003
Landscaping 1.00OOe- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,40OOe- 1,40OOe- 0,0000 1.50OOe-
005 005 004 004 004
Total 1.4500e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.50OOe-
003 005 004 004 004
�Mitigated
RO�G NOx �CO SO�2 Fugitive Exhalust PM10 Fugitive Exhalus PM�2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
RM10 PM1 0 Total PM�2,.,5 PM�2,.,5 Total
ateg
SubC ory �lb/day lb/day
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
Consumer 1.4400e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products 003
Landscaping 1.00OOe- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- OMOO 1.50OOe-
005 005 004 004 004
Total 1.4500e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.50OOe-
1 003 005 004 004 004
7.0 Water Detail
17.1 Mitigation �Measures Water
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 93 of 208
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
9�.,O Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours[Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps an�d Emergency Generators
Equipmen'tType �Nu�m,ber Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor F'uel'Type
Boilers
Equipment Type N mb�er Heat Inplut/Day Heat Inplut/Year Boiler Rating Fuel'Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Nu
11 11.0 Vegetation
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 94 of 208
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod,.2016-3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/11/20 17 12:0�3 RM
D Street Park Project- San Diego County, Winter
D Street Park Project
San Diego County, Wlin�ter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 �Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric ot Acreage �Floor Surface Area Population
City Park 0.,64 Acre 0.64 27,878.40 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq(Days) 40
Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2018
Utiffty Company San Diego Gas&Electric
CO2 Intensity 720.49 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr) (1b[MWhr) ([b/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-,Default Data
Construction Phase- Estimated construction schedule; Standard work week, Monday-Friday 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Off-road Equipment- Estimated Equipment.
Demolition - D Street is estimted to have 6�-inches of concrete across the entire 0.66 acre site approximately �14,500 cubic feet; assuming 145 lbs/cf,
approximately 1,050 tons.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionRhase NumDays 100.00 3.00
tblConstructionFhase NumDays 10-00 5.00
.7Value
00
.00
tblConstructionRhase NumDays 2.00 12.00
tblConstructionFhase NumDays 5.00 2.00
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 95 of 208
tbl Construction Rhase NumDays 1.00 5.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 2.50 0.64
tblOffRoad Equipment Off Road Equ ipmentUnitAmou�nt 2.00 1.00
tblOffRoad Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00
tblOffRoad Equipment Off Road Equ ipmentUnitAmou�nt 2.00 1.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum D�ail�y Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG N�Ox Gol S02 Fugitive Exhalust PM10 Fugitive Exhalust PM�2.,5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 To�tal CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
RM10 PM10 Total PM�2.5 PM�2.5 To�tal
Year �lb/d�ay �l�b/d�ay
2018 1.9099 22.6095 15.1096 0.0386 5.0201 0.91643 5.8613 0.8170 0.9093 1.6132 0.0000 3,982.015 3,982.0150 0.6801 0.0000 3,999.017
0 7
Maximum 1.9099 22.6095 15.1096 0.03�86 5.0201 0.9643 5.8613 0.8170 0.9093 1.6132 0.0000 3,982.015 3,982.0150 0.6801 0.0000 3,999.017
0 7
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx Gol S102 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio�-0O2 TotalCO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
�������11111111111111 � 111111111111111111
Year �lb/day lb/day
2018 1.9099 22-6095 15-1096 0.038,6 5.0201 0.9643 5.8613 0.8170 0.9093 1.6132 0.0000 3,982.015 3,982.0150 0.6801 0.0000 3,999.017
0 7
Maximum 1.9099 22-6095 15-1096 0.0386 5.0201 0.9643 5.8613 0.8170 0.9093 1.6132 0.0000 3,982.015 3,982.0150 0.6801 0.0000 3,,999.017
E IE: 0 7
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 96 of 208
ROG: NOx, CO S02 �Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fuglitive Exhaust PM2.5 EBiiio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
pm10 PWO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01.010, 0.00 0.00 01.00 01.00 01.00 0.00 01.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG N�Ox Go, S02 Fugitive Ekhalust PM10 Fugitive Ekhalust PM�2.,5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 TotalCO2 CH4 �N20 CO2q__
RM10 PIV110 Total PIV12.5 PIV12.5 Total
Category �lb/d�ay lb/day
Area 1.4400e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0�000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.50OOe-
003 005 004 004 004
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0�000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mobile 0.0290 0.1144 0.3121 8.30OOe- 0.0�6,59 1.01OOe- 01.0670, 0.0176 9.60OOe- 0.0186 83.6693 83.6693 5.25OOe- 83.8006
004 003 004 003
Total 0.0304 0.1144 0.3122 8.30OOe- 0.0659 1.01OOe- O�.0670 0.0176 9.60OOe- 0.0186, 83.6694 83.6694 5.2500e- 0.0000 83.8008
E 004 003 004 003
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx Go, S02 Fugitive Ekhaiust PM10 Fugitive Ekhaiust PIM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio�-0O2 TotalCO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
�������11111111111111 � 111111111111111111
Category �lb/day lb/day
Area 1.4400e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 01-00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.5,000e-
003 005 004 004 004
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mobile 0.0290 0.1144 0.3121 8.30OOe- 0.0659, 1.01OOe- 0.0670 0.0176 9.60OOe- 0.0186 83-6693 83-6693 5.25OOe- 83-8006
004 003 004 003
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 97 of 208
Total 0.0304 0.1144 0.3122 8.30OOe- 0.0659 1.01OOe- 01-01670, 0.0176 9.60OOe- 0.0186 83-6694 83-6694 5.25OOe- 0.0000 83-8008
E 004 003 004 E 003 =1
�ROG NOx co S02 Fu�gitive Exhaust RM10 Fu�gitive Exhaust P�M2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 TotalICO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
PWO PWO Total MIS PM�21.5 Total
M2*5 EBio-C01 02e]
otal
0.00 0.00 0.00
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01.010, 0.00 0.00 01.010, 01.010, 0.00 01.00 01.00 01.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date N�um Days N�um Days Phase Description
Number I I E E I Week I I I
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2018 1/5/2018 5 5
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/6/2018 1/12/2018 5 5
3 Grading Grading 1/13/2018 1/30/2018 5 12
4 Drainage and Utilities Trenching 1/31/2018 2/13/2018 5 10
5 Construction Building Construction 2/14/2018 2/16/2018 5 3
6 Paving Paving 2/17/2018 2/20/2018 5 2
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.64
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad EquipmentType, Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 8,1 0.73
Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Loaders 1 8.00 203 0.36
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 98 of 208
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 9�7 0.37
Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Loaders 1 8.00 203 0.36
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 917 0.37
Drainage and Utilities Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Drainage and Utilities Rubber Tired Loaders 1 8.00 203 0.36
Drainage and Utilities Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29,
Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 917 0.37
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Plate Compactors 1 8.00 8 0.43
Paving Ro�llers 2 7.00 8�O 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 917 0.37
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling
Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Vehicle
Class Class,
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 104.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 4 10-00 0.00 0.00 10-80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
Grading 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
Drainage and Utilities 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10-80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
Construction 4 12.00 5.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD-Mix HDT-Mix HHDT
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 99 of 208
Paving 11 28.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LID-Mix HDT-Mix HKIDT
11 Mitigation Measures Construction
3.2 Demolition - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 No-CO2 N�Bio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 otal
,Categ�ory lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5499 01.00,010, 4.5499 01.6890, 01.00,010, 0.6890 0.0000 0.,0000
Off-Road 1.5837 15.8780 11.0348 0.0211 01.8138 0.8138 01.77010, 0.7700 2,083.215 2,083.2158 0.5099 2,095.,963
8 7
Totall 1.5837' 15.87'80 11.03�48 0.0211 4.5499 O�.8138 5,.3636 O�.6890 O�.770�O 1.4590 2,083.215 2,083.2158 0.5099 2,095.963
------------1 1 8 m 7
Unmitiq �ted Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio,-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM1 01 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 otal
,Categ�ory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.19,59, 6.6�8,67 1.4671 0.0165 0.3635 01.0266 0.3901 01.0996 01.0255 0.1251 1,789.296 1,789.2966 0.1664 1,793.456
6 6
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 01-00,010, 0.0000 01-00,010, 01-00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0625 0.0448, 0.4221 1.1 OOOe- 0.1068 7.701010,e- 0.1076 01.0283 7.1 010101e- 0.0290 109-5026 109-5026 3.79OOe- 109-5974
003 01014 01014 003
Totall 0.258,4 6.7'314 1.8,89�2 0.0176 0.4703 01.0274 0.4977 01.1279 01.0262 0.1541 1,898.799 1,898.7992 0.1702 1,903-054,
1 2 0
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 100 of 208
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 No-CO2 N�Bio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 otal
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5499 01.00,010, 4.5499 01.6890, 01.00,010, 0,6890 0,0000 0.,0000
Off-Road 1.5837 15.8780 11.0348 0.0211 01.8138 0.8138 01.77010, 0,7700 0,0000 2,083,215 2,083,2158 0.5099 2,,095.,963
8 7
Totall 1.5837' 15.87'80 11.03�48 0.0211 4.5499 O�.8138 5,.3636 O�.6890 O�.770�O 1.4590 0.0000 2,083.215 2,083.2158 0.5099 2,095.963
8 m 7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 No-CO2 N�Bio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PIM10 Total P,M2.5 P,M2.5 otal
,Categ�ory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.19,59, 6.6�8,67 1.4671 0.0165 0.3635 01.0266 0.3901 01.0996 01.0255 0.1251 1,789.296 1,789.2966 0.1664 1,793.456
6 6
Vendor 0.0000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0�625 0.0448, 0.4221 1.1 OOOe-, 0.1068 7.701010,e- 0.1076 01.0283 7.1 010101e- 0.0290 109.5026 109.5026 3.7900e- 109.5974
003 01014 01014 003
Totall 0.2584 6.73�14 1.889�2 0.0176 0.4703 O�.0274 0.4977 O�.1279 O�.0262 0.1541 ]E 1,898.799 1,898.7992 0.1702 1,903.054,
2 0
33 Site Preparation - 2018
Unmitiq �ted Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �P,M2.5 Bio,-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20, CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 otal
E: I ����������� I m
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 10 1 of 208
Category lb/day I lb/day
�Fugitive Dust 0.8885 0.0000 0.8885 O�.4284 0.0000 0.4284 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.2207 14.4231 8.0�741 0.0160 O�.6445 0.6445 O�.5929 0.5929 1,609.818 1,609.8180 0.5012 1,622.347
0 0
Total O�.6445 1.5330 O�.4284
1.2207' 14.4231 8.07'41 0.0160 0.8885 O�.5929 1.0214 1,609.818 1,609.8180 0.5012 1,622.347
0 0
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0481 0.0344 0.3,247 8.50OOe- 0.0822 5.90OOe- 0.0827 0.0218 5.50OOe- OM23 842327 842327 2.92OOe- 84.3057
004 004 004 003
Total 0.0481 0.03,44 0.3247 8.50OOe- 0.0822 5.9000e- 0.0827 01.0218 5.5000e- 0.0223 84.2327 84.2327 2.9200e- 84.3057
1 004 O�04 O�04 003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.8885 01.00,010, 0.8885 01.4284 01.00,010, 0A284 0M00 0.0000
Off-Ro�ad 1.2207 14.4231 8.0741 0.0160 01.6445 0.6445 01.5929 O�5929 0M00 1,609�818 1,609�8180 0.5012 1,,622.347
0 0
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 102 of 208
7 Total 1.2207' 14.4231 8.07'41 0.0160 0.8885 0.6445 1.5330 O�.4284 O�.5929 1.0214 O�.0000 1,609-818 1,609-8180 0.5012 1,622-347
1 0 0
MItigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0481 0.0344 0.3,247 8.50OOe- 0.0822 5.90OOe- 0.0827 0.0218 5.50OOe- 0,0223 84,2327 84,2327 2,92OOe- 84.3057
004 004 004 003
Total 0.0481 0.03,44 0.3247 8.50OOe- 0.0822 5.9010,0e- 0.0827 01.0218 5.5010,0e- 0.022 84.23 e
004 O�O�4 O�O�4 003
3.41 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM1 0 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Rio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0A138 0M00 0.0000
Off-Ro�ad 1.8233 18�.1016 12.9979, 0.0239 01.9633 0.9633 01.90,83 O�9083 2,352277 2,3522772 0.5865 2,,366.940
2 3
Total 1.8�233 18.1016 12.919,79, 0.0239 0.7528 O�.9633 1.7160 O�.4138 O�.90�83 1.3221 2,352.277 2,352.2772 0.5865 2,366.940
1 2 3
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 103 of 208
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Cate
gory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0�866 0.0�620 0.5845 1.5200e- 0.1479 1.06010,e- 0.1489 01.0392 9.801010,e- 0.0402 151.6189 151.6189 5.25OOe- 151.7503
003 01013 01014 003
Total 0.0866 0.0620 0.5845 1.5200e- 0.1479 1.060,0e- 0.1489 01.0392 9.8010,0e- 0.040 151.61 e-
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�4 003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0A138 0M00 0.0000
Off-Road 1.8233, 18.1016, 12.99,79 0.0239 0.9633 0.9633 0.9083 O�9083 0M00 2,352277 2,3522772 0.5865 2,366.940
2 3
Total 1.8233 18.1016 12.919,79, 0.0239 0.7528 01.9633 1.7160 01.4138 01.90,83 1.3221 0.0000 2,352.277 2,352.2772 0.5865 2,366.940
1 2 3
Mitinated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Rio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
FCategory lb/day lb/day
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 104 of 208
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0�866 0.0�620 0.5845 1.5200e- 0.1479 1.060�O�e- 0.1489 O�.0392 9.80�O�O�e- 0.0402 151.6189 151.6189 5.25OOe- 151.7503
003 O�O�3 O�O�4 003
Total 0.08,66 0.0620 0.5845 1.5200e- 0.1479 1.0�60�O�e- 0.1489 O�.O�392 9.80�O�O�e- O�.040 151.61 e-
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�4 003
15 Drainage and Utilities - 20,18
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Off-Road 0.9518 10.7218 7.0557 0.0141 0.4938 0.4938 0.4543 0,4543 1,422,126 1,422,1265 0.4427 1,433.194
5 7
Total 0.9518 10.7218 7'.0557 0.0141 01.4938 0.4938 01.4543 0.4543 1,422.126 1,422.1265 0.4427 1,433.194
1 1 5 7
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM1 0 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Rio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Cate
gory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0M00 0M00 0M00 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0M00 0M00 0M00 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0385 0.0275 0.25918 6.80OOe- 0.0657 4.701010,e- 0.0662 01.0174 4.401010,e- 0�01179 673862 673862 2.34OOe- 67.4446
004 01014 01014 003
Total 0.038�5 0.0275 0.2598 6.8,000e- 0.0657 4.7000e- 0.0662 O�.01 74 4.4000e- 0.0179 67.3862 67.3862 2.3400e- 67.4�4�46
1 004 01014 01014 003
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 105 of 208
MItigated Construction On-SlIte
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Off-Road 0.9518 10.7218 7.0�557 0.0141 O�.4938 0.4938 O�.4543 0.4543 0.0000 1,422.126 1,422.1265 0.4427 1,433.194
5 7
Total 0.9518 10.7218 7'.0557 0.0141 O�.4938 0.4938 O�.4543 0.4543 0.0000 1,422.126 1,422.1265 0.4427 1,433.194
1 1 5 7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM1 0 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0M00 0M00 0M00 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0M00 0M00 0M00 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.038�5 0.0275 0.25918 6.80OOe- 0.0657 4.70OOe- 0.0662 0.0174 4.40OOe- O�0179 673862 673862 2.34OOe- 67.4446
004 004 004 003
Total 0.038�5 0.0275 0.2598 6.8,000e- 0.0657 4.7000e- 0.0662 O�.01 74 4.4000e- 0.0179 67.3862 67.3862 2.3400e- 67.4�4�46
1 004 01014 01014 003
3.6 Construction - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 106 of 208
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugifive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �P,M2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9512 9�.8507 6.8428 0.0102 01.6145 0.6145 01.5653 0.5653 1,031.191 1,031.1916 0.3210 1,039.217
6 2
Total 0.9512 9.8,507' 6.8,428, 0.0102 01.6145 0.6145 01.5653 01.5653 1,031.191 1,031.1916 0.3210 1,039.217
1 6 2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Tota1CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
CEateg�o lb/day lb/day
ry
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
I
Vendor 0.026,9 0.6,5919, 0.19,30 1.3,600e- 0.0339 5.24OOe- 0.0391 9.74OOe- 5.01 OOe- O�0148 1453490 1453490 0.0126 145.6634
003 003 003 003
Worker 0.0577 0.0413 0.3,8�917 1.0200e- 0.0986 7.1 OOOe- 0.0993 0.0262 6.50OOe- 0M68 101.0793 101.0793 3.50OOe- 101.1669
003 004 004 003
Total 0.0846 0.7012 0.5827 2.38OOe- 0.1324 5.95010e- 0.1384 01.0359 5.66010e- 0.0416 246.4282 246.4282 0.0161 246.8303
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day lb/day
gor
off_
Off-Ro�ad 0.9512 9�.8507 6.8428 0.0102 01.6145 0.6145 01.5653 O�5653 0M00 1,031191 1,0311916 0.3210 1,,039.2
6 2 ]
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 107 of 208
7 Total 0.9512 9.8,507' 6.8,428, 0.0102 0.6145 0.6145 0.5653 O�.5653 0.0000 1,031-191 1,031-1916 0.3210 1,039.217
1 6 2
MItigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Tota1CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0269 0.65919, 0.19,30 1.3,600e- 0.0339 5.24OOe- 0.0391 9.74OOe- 5.01 OOe- 0,0148 145,3490 145,3490 0.0126 145.6634
003 003 003 003
Worker 0.0577 0.0413 0.3,8�917 1.0200e- 0.0986 7.1 OOOe- 0.0993 0.0262 6.50OOe- 0,0268 101.0793 101.0793 3,50OOe- 101.1669
003 004 004 003
Total 0.0846 0.7012 0.5827 2.38OOe- 0.1324 5.950,0e- 0.1384 01.0359 5.660,0e- 0.0416 246.4282 246.4282 0.0161 246.8303
003 O�O�3 O�O�3
3.71 Paving - 20,18
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM1 0 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Rio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Ro�ad 1.6615 16.4949, 14.2003 0.0222 01.9311 0.9311 01.86019 OM09 2,155�545 2,155�5450 0.6325 2,,171.356
0 3
Paving 0.0�000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 0M00 0M00 0.0000
Total 1.6615 16.49,49, 14.2003 0.0222 O�.9311 0.9311 O�.860�9 0.8609 2,155.545 2,155.5450 0.6325 2,171.356
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 3
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 108 of 208
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Cate
gory lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.1346 0.0�9,64 0.90912 2.37OOe- 0.2300 1.66010,e- 0.2317 01.0610, 1.53010,e- 0.0625 235.8516 235.8516 8.17OOe- 236.0560
003 01013 01013 003
Total 0.1346 0.0964 0.910912 2.37OOe- 0.2300 1.660,0e- 0.23117 01.0610 1.530,0e- 0.062 235.85 e-
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�3 003
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NO,x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 �Flugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM10, PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
Category lb/day I lb/day
Off-Road 1.6,6,15 16.49,49 14.2003 0.0222 0.9311 0.9311 0.8609 0M09 0M00 2,155�545 2,155�5450 0.6325 2,171.356
0 3
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0M00 0M00 0.0000
Total 1.6615 16.4949, 14.2003 0.0222 01.9311 0.9311 01.86019 0.8609 0.0000 2,155.545 2,155.5450 0.6325 2,171.356
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 3
Mitinated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 TotaICO2 GH4 N20 CO2e,
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
I m
FCategory lb/day lb/day
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 109 of 208
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.1346 0.0�9�64 0.909�2 2.37OOe- 0.2300 1.660�O�e- 0.2317 O�.0610 1.530�O�e- 0.0625 235.8516 235.8516 8.17OOe- 236.0560
003 O�O�3 O�O�3 003
Total 0.1346 0.0964 0.9092 2.37'00e- 0.2300 1.660�O�e- 0.2317 O�.O�61 0 1.530�O�e- O�.062 235.85 e-
1 003 O�O�3 O�O�3 003
4.,0 Operational Detail - Mo�bile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhau�st PM10 �Flugitive Exhau�st �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Categ�ory lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.0290 0.1144 0.3,121 8.3,000e- 0.0659 1.01OOe- 0.0670 0.0176 9.60OOe- O�0186 816693 816693 5.25OOe- 83.8006
004 003 004 003 1
Unmitigated 0.0290 0.1144 0.3,121 8.3,000e- 0.0659 1.01OOe- 0.0670 0.0176 9.60OOe- O�0186 816693 816693 5.25OOe- 83.8006
004 003 004 003
4.2 'Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip�Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VIVIT Annual VMT
City Park 1.21 14.56 10.71 9,552 9,552
Total 1-21 1 14-56 10.71 9,552 97552
43 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip% Trip Purpose%
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C I H-0 or C-NW H-W or C- I H-S,or C-C, =H-O or:C-:NW Primary Diverted =P=ass-by::
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page I 10 of 208
City Park 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 66, 28 6
4.4 Fleet Mix
F::7Land�Use LDA �LDT1 �LDT2 MDV LHD1 LH�D2 MH�D HHD OBUS UBU�S M�CY SBUS MH
City
Park 0.574135 0.045525 0.189369 0.1165,19 0.019283 0.005,646 0.014833 0.022073 0.001871 0.002173 0.006385 O�.O�0073,9 0.001452
5.0 �Energy Detail
.11
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NO�x CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Flugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-0O2 N�Bio-0O2 TotalCO2 GH4 N20 CO2e
PM101 PIM10 Total P,M2.5 P,M2.5 otal
M
,Categ�ory lb/day I lb/day CO2e
0.0000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
NaturalGas 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
NaturalGas 0.0000 0.0�000 0.0�000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
5.2 Energy by Land Use 1- NaturalGas
Unmitiq �ted
NaturalGa ROG NOx GO S102 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �P,M2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio�-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 �P,M2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb�/day
Us
C City
ity Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00001
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page I I I of 208
7 To 0.00
�tal 1 00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 01-010,010, 0.0000 01-0000 01-OOOOE 0.0000 01.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Witigated
NaturalGa RO�G NO�x CO SO�2, Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust �PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 GH4, �N20 CO2e
s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM�2.5 �PM2.5 Total
BTU/yr
Land Use k lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 01.00,010 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
o.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitig�ation �Measures Area
ROG NOx GO, S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PIM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio�-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
�������11111111111111 � 111111111111111111
Category �lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.4400e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 01-00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.5,000e-
003 005 004 004 004
Unmitigated 1.4400e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.5,000e-
003 005 004 004 004
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page H 2 of 208
a.2 Area by SubCatego�ry
Unmitigated
RO�G N�Ox CO SO�2, Fugitive Exhaiust PM10 Fugitive Exhalust PM�2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
RM10 PM10 Total PM�2.5 PM�2.5 Total
SubCategory �lb/day lb/day
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
Consumer 1.4400e- 0.0000 01.00,010, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products 003
Landscaping 1.00OOe- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,40OOe- 1,40OOe- 0,0000 1.50OOe-
005 005 004 004 004
Total 1.4500e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 01.00,010 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- 0.0000 1.50OOe-
003 005 004 004 004
�Mitigated
RO�G NOx �CO SO�2 Fugitive Exhalust PM10 Fugitive Exhalus PM�2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 �N20 CO2e
RM10 PM1 0 Total PM�2,.,5 PM�2,.,5 Total
ateg
SubC ory �lb/day lb/day
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
Consumer 1.4400e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products 003
Landscaping 1.00OOe- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.40OOe- 1.40OOe- OMOO 1.50OOe-
005 005 004 004 004
Total 1.4500e- 0.0000 7.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.50OOe-
1 003 005 004 004 004
7.0 Water Detail
17.1 Mitigation �Measures Water
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page H 3 of 208
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
9�.,O Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours[Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps an�d Emergency Generators
Equipmen'tType �Nu�m,ber Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor F'uel'Type
Boilers
Equipment Type N mb�er Heat Inplut/Day Heat Inplut/Year Boiler Rating Fuel'Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Nu
11 11.0 Vegetation
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 1]4 of 208
R- -E C 0 N Air Quality Analysis
ATTACHMENT 2
Health Risk Assessment Calculations
Summary Output
D Street,Park Project
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 1]5 of 208
Health Risk Assessment Calculations
Assessed as a Park
Maximum Exposure in Model 3rd'Trimester O�<2 2<9 2<1 6 16<30 116-70
Cair 4.00E-02 4.00E-02 4.00E-02 4.00E-02 4.00E-02 4.00E-012
�DBR 361 1090 861 745 335 290
A 1 1 1 1 1 1
EF 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68
�Dose-air 9.82E-06 2.96E-05 2.3,4E-05 2.03E-05 9�.11 E-06 7.89E-06
CPF 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
ASF 10 10 3, 3 1 1
ED 0.25 2 7' 14 14 54
AT '70 70 70 70 70 70
Fraction ofTime at Park 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
Risk in 1 mill 0.06 1.55 1.29 2.23 0.33 1.12
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Chronic Exposure 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.01018
0_9 2.9
O�-30 4.2
0-70 5.0
Assessed as a Residential Use
Maximum Exposure in Model 3rd Trimester 01<2 2<9 2<1 6 16<30 16-7'0
Cair 4.00E-02 4.00E-02 4.00E-02 4,.00E-02 4.00E-02 4.00E-012
�DBR 361 1090 861 745 335 290
A 1 1 1 1 1 1
EF 0.96 0.96 0.9�6 0.96 0.96 0.96
Dose-air 1.39E-05 4.19E-05 3.31 E-05 2.86E-05 1.29E-05 1.11 E-05
CPF 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
ASF 10 10 3 3 1 1
ED 0.25 2 7 14 14 54
AT 70 70 70 70 70 70
Fraction ofTime at Home 0.85 0.85 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.73
Risk in 1 mill 0.46 11.18 7.86 13.59 2.07 6.90
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Chronic Exposure 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.01018
0_9 19.5
O�-30 27.3
0-70 32.1
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 116 of 208
AERMOD Input Produced by:
AERMOD View Ver. 8.8.1
Lakes Environmental Software Inc.
Date: 10/9/2015
File: C-.\AERMOD\7937\701 D St\701 D St.AD�I
AERMOD Control Pathway
CO STARTING
TITLEONE C-\AERMOD\7937\701 D St\701 D St.isc
MODELOPT CONC FLAT
AVERTIME 1 ANNUAL
URBANOPT 100 Test
POLLUTID PM 10
FLAGPOLE 5,.00
RUNORNOT RUN
ERRORFIL "701 D St.err"
CO FINISHED
AERMOD Source Pathway
SO STARTING
Source Location
Source ID - Type X Coord. Y Coord.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE1
DESCRSRC 1-5 S of E St
PREFIX
Length of Side 30.00
Configuration Adjacent
Emission Rate 0.002012
Vertical Dimension = 7.26
SZINIT 3.38
Nodes 2
490785.349, 3610844.637, 8.501, 3.631, 13.95
490623.000, 3611321.210, 10.961, 3. 63, 13.95
---------------------------------------------------------------------
LOCATION L0001738 VOLUME 490780.512 3610858.836 0.0
LOCATION L0001739 VOLUME 490770.838 3610887'.233 0.0
LOCATION L0001740 VOLUME 490761.164 3610915.630 0.0
LOCATION L0001741 VOLUME 490751.491 3610944.028 0.0
LOCATION L0001742 VOLUME 490741.817 361097'2.425 0.0
LOCATION L0001743 VOLUME 490732.143 3611000.823 0.0
LOCATION L0001744 VOLUME 490722.469 3611029.220 0.0
LOCATION L0001745 VOLUME 490712.795 3611057'.618 0.0
LOCATION L0001746 VOLUME 490703.121 3611086.015 0.0
L 0 CAT�Rjb_C�gl�QAI�dj Packet VOLUME 490693.447 3611114.413 0.0 Page 1]7 of 208
LOCATION L0001748 VOLUME 490683.774 3611142.810 0.0
LOCATION L0001749 VOLUME 490674.100 361117'1.208 0.0
LOCATION L0001750 VOLUME 490664.426 3611199.605 0.0
LOCATION L0001751 VOLUME 490654.752 3611228.003 0.0
LOCATION L0001752 VOLUME 490645.078 3611256.400 0.0
LOCATION L0001753 VOLUME 490635.404 3611284.798 0.0
LOCATION L0001754 VOLUME 490625.730 3611313.195 0.0
End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2
DESCRSRC 1-5 North of E St
PREFIX
Length of Side 50.00
Configuration Adjacent
Emission Rate 0.002012
Vertical Dimension = 7.26
SZINIT 3.38
Nodes 2
490622.73lr 3611320.876r 10.96r 3. 63r 23.26
490137.819, 3612882.363, 10.121, 3. 63, 23.26
---------------------------------------------------------------------
LOCATION L0001755 VOLUME 490615.316 3611344.752 0.0
LOCATION L0001756 VOLUME 490600.487 3611392.502 0.0
LOCATION L0001757 VOLUME 490585.659 3611440.253 0.0
LOCATION L0001758 VOLUME 490570.830 3611488.003 0.0
LOCATION L0001759 VOLUME 490556.001 3611535.754 0.0
LOCATION L0001760 VOLUME 490541.173 3611583.504 0.0
LOCATION L0001761 VOLUME 490526.344 3611631.255 0.0
LOCATION L0001762 VOLUME 490511.515 361167'9.005 0.0
LOCATION L0001763 VOLUME 490496.687 36117'26.756 0.0
LOCATION L0001764 VOLUME 490481.858 36117'7'4.506 0.0
LOCATION L0001765 VOLUME 490467.029 3611822.257 0.0
LOCATION L0001766 VOLUME 490452.201 361187'0.007 0.0
LOCATION L0001767 VOLUME 490437.372 3611917'.758 0.0
LOCATION L0001768 VOLUME 490422.543 3611965.508 0.0
LOCATION L0001769 VOLUME 490407.715 3612013.259 0.0
LOCATION L0001770 VOLUME 490392.886 3612061.009 0.0
LOCATION L0001771 VOLUME 490378.057 3612108.760 0.0
LOCATION L0001772 VOLUME 490363.229 3612156.510 0.0
LOCATION L0001773 VOLUME 490348.400 3612204.261 0.0
LOCATION L0001774 VOLUME 490333.571 3612252.011 0.0
LOCATION L0001775 VOLUME 490318.743 3612299.762 0.0
LOCATION L0001776 VOLUME 490303.914 3612347'.512 0.0
LOCATION L0001777 VOLUME 490289.085 3612395.263 0.0
LOCATION L0001778 VOLUME 490274.256 3612443.013 0.0
LOCATION L0001779 VOLUME 490259.428 3612490.764 0.0
LOCATION L0001780 VOLUME 490244.599 3612538.514 0.0
LOCATION L0001781 VOLUME 490229.770 3612586.265 0.0
LOCATION L0001782 VOLUME 490214.942 3612634.015 0.0
LOCATION L0001783 VOLUME 490200.113 3612681.766 0.0
LOCATION L0001784 VOLUME 490185.284 36127'29.516 0.0
LOCATION L0001785 VOLUME 490170.456 36127'7'7'.267 0.0
LOCATION L0001786 VOLUME 490155.627 3612825.017 0.0
LOCATION L0001787 VOLUME 490140.798 361287'2.768 0.0
End of LINE VOLUME Source ID SLINE2
Source Parameters **
LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE1
SRCPARAM L0001738 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPA�-&J$_C�g,�QAI��WA Packet 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38 2 Page H 8 of 208
SRCPARAM L0001740 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001741 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001742 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001743 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001744 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001745 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001746 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001747 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001748 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001749 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001750 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001751 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001752 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001753 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001754 0.0001183529 3. 63 13.95 3.38
---------------------------------------------------------------------
LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2
SRCPARAM L0001755 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001756 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001757 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001758 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001759 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001760 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001761 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001762 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001763 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001764 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001765 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001766 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001767 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001768 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001769 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001770 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001771 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001772 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001773 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001774 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001775 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001776 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001777 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001778 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001779 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001780 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001781 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001782 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001783 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001784 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001785 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001786 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
SRCPARAM L0001787 0.0000609697 3. 63 23.26 3.38
---------------------------------------------------------------------
URBANSRC L0001738
URBANSRC L0001739
URBANSRC L0001740
URBANSRC L0001741
URBANSRC L0001742
URBANSRC L0001743
URBANSRC L0001744
URBANSRC L0001745
URBAN�byo_C�gj�QAI�A Packet Page H 9 of 208
URBANSRC L0001747
URBANSRC L0001748
URBANSRC L0001749
URBANSRC L0001750
URBANSRC L0001751
URBANSRC L0001752
URBANSRC L0001753
URBANSRC L0001754
URBANSRC L0001755
URBANSRC L0001756
URBANSRC L0001757
URBANSRC L0001758
URBANSRC L0001759
URBANSRC L0001760
URBANSRC L0001761
URBANSRC L0001762
URBANSRC L0001763
URBANSRC L0001764
URBANSRC L0001765
URBANSRC L0001766
URBANSRC L0001767
URBANSRC L0001768
URBANSRC L0001769
URBANSRC L0001770
URBANSRC L0001771
URBANSRC L0001772
URBANSRC L0001773
URBANSRC L0001774
URBANSRC L0001775
URBANSRC L0001776
URBANSRC L0001777
URBANSRC L0001778
URBANSRC L0001779
URBANSRC L0001780
URBANSRC L0001781
URBANSRC L0001782
URBANSRC L0001783
URBANSRC L0001784
URBANSRC L0001785
URBANSRC L0001786
URBANSRC L0001787
SRCGROUP ALL
SO FINISHED
AERMOD Receptor Pathway
RE STARTING
GRIDCART UCART1 STA
XYINC 49035,2.65 21 20.00 3611658.88 21 20.00
FLAG 1 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 1 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 1 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 1 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 2 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 2 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 2 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
2020-01-14 Agenda$�Cjgt 2 51.00 5.00 5.00 4 Page 120 of 208
FLAG 3 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 3 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 3 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 3 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 4 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 4 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 4 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 4 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 51 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 51 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 51 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 51 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 6 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 6 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 6 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 6 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 7 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 7 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 7 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 7 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 8 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 8 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 8 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 8 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 9 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 9 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 9 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 9 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 10 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 10 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 10 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 10 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 11 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 11 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 11 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 11 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 12 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 12 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 12 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 12 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 13 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 13 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 13 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 13 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 14 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 14 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 14 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 14 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 15, 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 15, 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 15, 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 15, 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 16 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 16 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 16 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 16 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 17 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 17 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 17 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
2020-01-14 Agenda$�Cjgt 17 51.00 5.00 5.00 5 Page 121 of 208
FLAG 18 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 18 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 18 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 18 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 19 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 19 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 19 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 19 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 20 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 20 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 20 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 20 51.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 21 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 21 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 21 51.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
FLAG 21 51.00 5.00 5.00
GRIDCART UCART1 END
DESCRREC "" '111
DISCCART 490591.07 3611906.64 5.00
DISCCART 490579.82 3611883.66 5.00
DISCCART 490581.32 3611866.22 5.00
DISCCART 490582.74 3611846.33 5.00
DISCCART 490584.89 3611827.84 5.00
DISCCART 490587.29 3611809.01 5.00
DISCCART 490589.69 3611789.79 5.00
DISCCART 490591.69 3611769.76 5.00
DISCCART 490628.75 3611918.59 5.00
DISCCART 490634.93 3611899.66 5.00
DISCCART 490656.13 3611858.19 5.00
DISCCART 490675.45 3611865.73 5.00
DISCCART 490643.41 3611809.18 5.00
DISCCART 490690.53 3611819.55 5.00
DISCCART 490642.47 3611787.51 5.00
DISCCART 490635.87 3611847.35 5.00
BEGIN OF RISK GRID RECEPTORS
X Grid Origin = 490635.87
Y Grid Origin = 3611847.35
No. of Tiers = 1
Tier 1: Segment Distance = 5.00
Tier 1: Tier Spacing = 20.00
----------
DISCCART 490630.88 3611842.25 5.00
DISCCART 490630.88 3611852.25 5.00
DISCCART 490640.88 3611842.25 5.00
DISCCART 490640.88 3611852.25 5.00
END OF RISK GRID RECEPTORS
RE FINISHED
AERMOD Meteorology Pathway
ME STARTING
SURFFILE "N \AIR-GHG-NOISE-Technical\0 0 1-AIR\Analysis-Models\Lakes\Met Data\AERMODMET156,45923188, 319020082013\ME'Tl564592008
2013.SFC11
PROFFILE "N \AIR-GHG-NOISE-Technical\0 0 1-AIR\Analysis-Models\Lakes\Met Data\AERMODMET156,45923188, 319020082013\ME'Tl564592008
2013.PFLII
SURFDATA 23188 2008 SAN-DIEGO/LIND�BERGH-FIELD
UAIRD�62%_OJIIIOAg��A$acket 6 Page 122 of 208
PROFBASE 1.0 METERS
ME FINISHED
AERMOD Output Pathway
OU STARTING
RECTABLE ALLAVE 1ST
RECTABLE 1 1ST
Auto-Generated Plotfiles
PLOTFILE 1 ALL 1ST "701 D St.AD\OlHlGALL.PLTVV 31
PLOTFILE ANNUAL ALL "701 D St.AD\ANOOGALL.PLTVV 32
SUMMFILE "701 D St.sum"
OU FINISHED
*** Message Summary For AERMOD Model Setup
--------- Summary of Total Messages --------
• Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s)
• Total of 1 Warning Message (s)
• Total of 0 Informational Message (s)
FATAL ERROR MESSAGES
*** NONE ***
WARNING MESSAGES
CO W320 22 URBOPT: Input Parameter May Be Out-of-Range for Parameter URB-POP
SETUP Finishes Successfully
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 123 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 1
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
MODEL SETUP OPTIONS SUMMARY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
**Model Is Setup For Calculation of Average CONCentration Values.
-_ DEPOSITION LOGIC --
**NO GAS DEPOSITION Data Provided.
**NO PARTICLE DEPOSITION Data Provided.
**Model Uses NO DRY DEPLETION. DRYD�PLT = F
**Model Uses NO WET DEPLETION. WETD�PLT = F
**Model Uses URBAN Dispersion Algorithm for the SBL for 50 Source(s) ,
for Total of 1 Urban Area(s) :
0
Urban Population 100.0 . Urban Roughness Length 1.000 m
**Model Allows User-Specified Options:
1. Stack-tip Downwash.
2. Model Assumes Receptors on FLAT Terrain.
3. Use Calms Processing Routine.
4. Use Missing Data Processing Routine.
S. No Exponential Decay.
6. Urban Roughness Length of 1.0 Meter Used.
**Other Options Specified:
CCVR Sub - Meteorological data includes CCVR substitutions
TEMP-Sub - Meteorological data includes TEMP substitutions
**Model Accepts FLAGPOLE Receptor Heights.
**The User Specified a Pollutant Type of: PM-10
**Model Calculates 1 Short Term Average (s) of: 1-HR
and Calculates ANNUAL Averages
**This Run Includes: 50 Source (s) ; 1 Source Group(s) ; and 461 Receptor(s)
**Model Set To Continue RUNning After the Setup Testing.
**The AERMET Input Meteorological Data Version Date: 14134
**Output Options Selected:
Model Outputs Tables of ANNUAL Averages by Receptor
Model Outputs Tables of Highest Short Term Values by Receptor (RECTABLE Keyword)
Model Outputs External File (s) of High Values for Plotting (PLOTFILE Keyword)
Model Outputs Separate Summary File of High Ranked Values (SUMMFILE Keyword)
**NOTE-. The Following Flags May Appear Following CONC Values: c for Calm Hours
m for Missing Hours
b for Both Calm and Missing Hours
**Misc. Inputs: Base Elev. for Pot. Temp. Profile (m MSL) 1.00 Decay Coef. = 0.000 Rot. Angle 0.0
Emission Units = GRAMS/SEC Emission Rate Unit Factor 0.10000E+07
Output Units = MICROGRAMS/M**3
**Appro�i&W-�'�14SA'i�&cR,�-pgc&equirements of Model = 3.6 MB of RAM. 8 Page 124 of 208
**Detailed Error/Message File: 701 D St.err
**File for Summary of Results: 701 D St.sum
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 125 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 2
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
VOLUME SOURCE DATA
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) x Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY Sz SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0001738 0 0.1183SE-03 490780.5 3610858.8 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001739 0 0.1183SE-03 490770.8 3610887'.2 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001740 0 0.1183SE-03 490761.2 3610915. 6 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001741 0 0.1183SE-03 490751.5 3610944.0 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001742 0 0.1183SE-03 490741.8 361097'2.4 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001743 0 0.1183SE-03 490732.1 3611000.8 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001744 0 0.1183SE-03 490722.5 3611029.2 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001745, 0 0.1183SE-03 490712.8 3611057'. 6 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001746 0 0.1183SE-03 490703.1 3611086.0 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001747 0 0.1183SE-03 490693.4 3611114.4 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001748 0 0.1183SE-03 490683.8 3611142.8 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L0001749 0 0.1183SE-03 490674.1 361117'1.2 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L000175,0 0 0.1183SE-03 490664.4 3611199. 6 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L000175,1 0 0.1183SE-03 490654.8 3611228.0 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L000175,2 0 0.1183SE-03 490645.1 3611256.4 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L000175,3 0 0.1183SE-03 490635.4 3611284.8 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
L000175,4 0 0.1183SE-03 490625.7 3611313.2 1.0 3.63 13.95 3.38 YES
LO 0 0 175,5, 0 0.60970E-04 490615.3 3611344.8 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L000175,6 0 0.60970E-04 490600.5 3611392.5 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
LO 0 0 175,7 0 0.60970E-04 490585.7 3611440.3 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L000175,8 0 0.60970E-04 490570.8 3611488.0 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
LO 0 0 175,9 0 0.60970E-04 490556.0 3611535.8 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001760 0 0.60970E-04 490541.2 3611583.5 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001761 0 0.60970E-04 490526.3 3611631.3 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001762 0 0.60970E-04 490511.5 361167'9.0 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001763 0 0.60970E-04 490496.7 36117'26.8 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001764 0 0.60970E-04 490481.9 3 6 117'7'4.5 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001765, 0 0.60970E-04 490467.0 3611822.3 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001766 0 0.60970E-04 490452.2 361187'0.0 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001767 0 0.60970E-04 490437.4 3611917'.8 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001768 0 0.60970E-04 490422.5 3611965.5 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001769 0 0.60970E-04 490407.7 3612013.3 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001770 0 0.60970E-04 490392.9 3612061.0 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001771 0 0.60970E-04 490378.1 3612108.8 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001772 0 0.60970E-04 490363.2 3612156.5 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001773 0 0.60970E-04 490348.4 3612204.3 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001774 0 0.60970E-04 490333.6 3612252.0 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001775, 0 0.60970E-04 490318.7 3612299.8 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001776 0 0.60970E-04 490303.9 3612347'.5 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001777 0 0.60970E-04 490289.1 3612395.3 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 10 Page 126 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 3
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
VOLUME SOURCE DATA
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) x Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY Sz SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0001778 0 0.60970E-04 490274.3 3612443.0 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001779 0 0.60970E-04 490259.4 3612490.8 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001780 0 0.60970E-04 490244.6 3612538.5 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001781 0 0.60970E-04 490229.8 3612586.3 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001782 0 0.60970E-04 490214.9 3612634.0 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001783 0 0.60970E-04 490200.1 3612681.8 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001784 0 0.60970E-04 490185.3 36127'29.5 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001785, 0 0.60970E-04 490170.5 36127'7'7'.3 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001786 0 0.60970E-04 490155.6 3612825.0 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
L0001787 0 0.60970E-04 490140.8 361287'2.8 1.0 3.63 23.26 3.38 YES
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 11 Page 127 of 208
AERMOD — VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET — VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 4
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS
SRCGROUP ID SOURCE ID�s
----------- ----------
ALL L0001738 L0001739 L0001740 L0001741 f L0001742 L0001743 L0001744 L0001745
L0001746 f L0001747 r L0001748 r L00017'49 f L0001750 f L0001751 r L0001752 r L0001753 r
L000175,4 f L0001755 r L0001756 r L0001757 f L0001758 f L0001759 r L0001760 r L000176,1 r
L0001762 f L0001763 r L0001764 r L00017'65 f L0001766 f L0001767 r L0001768 r L000176,9 r
L0001770 f L0001771 r L0001772 r L00017'7'3 f L0001774 f L0001775 r L0001776 r L0001777 r
L0001778 f L0001779 r L0001780 r L00017'81 f L0001782 f L0001783 r L0001784 r L0001785 r
L0001786 f L0001787 r
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 12 Page 128 of 208
AERMOD — VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET — VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 51
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
SOURCE IDs DEFINED AS URBAN SOURCES
URBAN ID URBAN POP SOURCE ID�s
-------- --------- ----------
100. L0001738 L0001739 L0001740 L0001741 L0001742 L0001743 L0001744
L0001745, f
L0001746 f L0001747 r L0001748 r L00017'49 f L0001750 f L0001751 r L0001752 r L0001753 r
L000175,4 f L0001755 r L0001756 r L0001757 f L0001758 f L0001759 r L0001760 r L000176,1 r
L0001762 f L0001763 r L0001764 r L00017'65 f L0001766 f L0001767 r L0001768 r L000176,9 r
L0001770 f L0001771 r L0001772 r L00017'7'3 f L0001774 f L0001775 r L0001776 r L0001777 r
L0001778 f L0001779 r L0001780 r L00017'81 f L0001782 f L0001783 r L0001784 r L0001785 r
L0001786 f L0001787 r
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 13 Page 129 of 208
AERMOD — VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET — VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 6
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
GRIDDED RECEPTOR NETWORK SUMMARY
0
NETWORK ID: UCART1 . NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
X—COORDINATES OF GRID
(METERS)
49035,2.6r 490372.6r 490392.6r 490412. 6r 490432.6f 490452.6r 490472.6r 490492.6r 490512.6, 490532.6r
49055,2.6r 490572.6r 490592.6r 4 9 0 6 12. 6 r 490632.6f 490652.6r 490672.6r 490692.6r 490712.6, 490732.6r
49075,2.6r
Y—COORDINATES OF GRID
(METERS)
361165,8.9f 3611678.9r 3611698.9f 3611718.9r 3611738.9f 3611758.9r 3611778.9r 3611798.9r 36,11818.9f 3611838.9f
361185,8.9f 3611878.9r 3611898.9f 3611918.9r 3611938.9f 3611958.9r 3611978.9r 3611998.9r 36,12018.9f 3612038.9r
361205,8.9f
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 14 Page 130 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 7
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
RECEPTOR FLAGPOLE HEIGHT'S IN METERS
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490352.65 490372.65 490392. 65 490412.65 490432.65 490452.65 490472.6,5 490492.65 490512.65
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3612038.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3612018.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611998.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611978.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
361195,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611938.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611918.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611898.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611878.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
361185,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611838.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611818.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611798.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611778.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
361175,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611738.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611718.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611698.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611678.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
361165,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, is Page 131 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 8
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
RECEPTOR FLAGPOLE HEIGHT'S IN METERS
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490532.65 490552.65 49057'2. 65 490592.65 490612.65 490632.65 490652.6,5 490672.65 490692.65
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3612038.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3612018.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611998.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611978.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
361195,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611938.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611918.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611898.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611878.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
361185,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611838.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611818.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611798.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611778.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
361175,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611738.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611718.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611698.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611678.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
361165,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 16 Page 132 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 9
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
RECEPTOR FLAGPOLE HEIGHT'S IN METERS
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490712.65 490732.65 4907'52. 65
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3612038.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3612018.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611998.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611978.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
361195,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611938.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611918.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611898.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611878.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
361185,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611838.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611818.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611798.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611778.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
361175,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611738.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611718.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611698.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
3611678.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
361165,8.88 5.00 5.00 5.00
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 17 Page 133 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 10
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
*** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS
(X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
(METERS)
490591.1f 3611906.6r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490579.8f 3611883.7r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
4905,81.3f 3611866.2r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490582.7f 3611846.3r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
4905,84.9f 3611827.8r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490587.3f 3611809.Or 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
4905,89.7f 3611789.8r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490591.7f 3611769.8r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
490628.8f 3611918.6r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490634.9f 3611899.7r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
49065,6.lf 3611858.2r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490675.5f 3611865.7r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
490643.4f 3611809.2r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490690.5f 3611819.5r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
490642.5,f 3611787.5r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490635.9f 3 6 118 4 7.3 r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
490630.9f 3611842.2r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490630.9f 3611852.2r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
490640.9f 3611842.2r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ; 490640.9f 3611852.2r 1.0f 1.0f 5.0) ;
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 18 Page 134 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 11
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
SOURCE-RECEPTOR COMBINATIONS FOR WHICH CALCULATIONS MAY NOT BE PERFORMED
LESS THAN 1.0 METER; WITHIN OPENPIT; OR BEYOND 80KM, FOR FASTAREA/FASTALL
SOURCE - - RECEPTOR LOCATION - - DISTANCE
ID XR (METERS) YR (METERS) (METERS)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0001761 490492.6 3611658.9 -6.44
L0001761 490512.6 3611658.9 -19.18
L0001761 490532.6 3611658.9 -21.67'
L0001761 490552.6 3611658.9 -11.86
L0001761 490512.6 3611678.9 -0.45
L0001761 490532.6 3611678.9 -1.97'
L0001762 490472.6 3611658.9 -6.24
L0001762 490492.6 3611658.9 -22.42
L0001762 490512.6 3611658.9 -29.85
L0001762 490532.6 3611658.9 -20.83
L0001762 490552.6 3611658.9 -4.21
L0001762 490472.6 3611678.9 -11.14
L0001762 490492.6 3611678.9 -31.14
L0001762 490512.6 3611678.9 -48.87'
L0001762 490532.6 3611678.9 -28.87'
L0001762 490552.6 3611678.9 -8.87'
L0001762 490472.6 3611698.9 -6.36
L0001762 490492.6 3611698.9 -22.61
L0001762 490512.6 3611698.9 -30.10
L0001762 490532.6 3611698.9 -21.00
L0001762 490552.6 3611698.9 -4.32
L0001762 490492.6 3611718.9 -5.90
L0001762 490512.6 3611718.9 -10.12
L0001762 490532.6 3611718.9 -4.88
L0001763 490492.6 3611678.9 -1.96
L0001763 490512.6 3611678.9 0.46
L0001763 490472.6 3611698.9 -13.20
L0001763 490492.6 3611698.9 -21.84
L0001763 490512.6 3611698.9 -17'.89
L0001763 490532.6 3611698.9 -4.51
L0001763 490452.6 3611718.9 -5.27'
L0001763 490472.6 3611718.9 -24.7'1
L0001763 490492.6 3611718.9 -41.16
L0001763 490512.6 3611718.9 -32.21
L0001763 490532.6 3611718.9 -13.19
L0001763 490452.6 3611738.9 -4.33
L0001763 490472.6 3611738.9 -23.09
L0001763 490492.6 3611738.9 -37'.23
L0001763 490512.6 3611738.9 -29.96
L0001763 490532.6 3611738.9 -12.06
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 19 Page 135 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 12
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
SOURCE-RECEPTOR COMBINATIONS FOR WHICH CALCULATIONS MAY NOT BE PERFORMED
LESS THAN 1.0 METER; WITHIN OPENPIT; OR BEYOND 80KM, FOR FASTAREA/FASTALL
SOURCE - - RECEPTOR LOCATION - - DISTANCE
ID XR (METERS) YR (METERS) (METERS)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0001763 490472.6 3611758.9 -9.89
L0001763 490492.6 3611758.9 -17'.63
L0001763 490512.6 3611758.9 -14.14
L0001763 490532.6 3611758.9 -1.7'9
L0001764 490452.6 3611738.9 -3.94
L0001764 490472.6 3611738.9 -13.21
L0001764 490492.6 3611738.9 -12.7'8
L0001764 490512.6 3611738.9 -2.92
L0001764 490452.6 3611758.9 -16.88
L0001764 490472.6 3611758.9 -31.87'
L0001764 490492.6 3611758.9 -31.02
L0001764 490512.6 3611758.9 -15.48
L0001764 490432.6 3611778.9 -0.61
L0001764 490452.6 3611778.9 -20.48
L0001764 490472.6 3611778.9 -39.81
L0001764 490492.6 3611778.9 -38.36
L0001764 490512.6 3611778.9 -18.91
L0001764 490532.6 3611778.9 0.97'
L0001764 490452.6 3611798.9 -11.97'
L0001764 490472.6 3611798.9 -23.95
L0001764 490492.6 3611798.9 -23.35
L0001764 490512.6 3611798.9 -10.7'4
L0001764 490472.6 3611818.9 -4.69
L0001764 490492.6 3611818.9 -4.34
L0001765, 490452.6 3611778.9 -4.31
L0001765, 490472.6 3611778.9 -6.27'
L0001765, 490492.6 3611778.9 0.37'
L0001765, 490432.6 3611798.9 -8.43
L0001765, 490452.6 3611798.9 -22.56
L0001765, 490472.6 3611798.9 -25.97'
L0001765, 490492.6 3611798.9 -15.33
L0001765, 490432.6 3611818.9 -15.46
L0001765, 490452.6 3611818.9 -35.24
L0001765, 490472.6 3611818.9 -43.45
L0001765, 490492.6 3611818.9 -24.17'
L0001765, 490512.6 3611818.9 -4.26
L0001765, 490432.6 3611838.9 -11.82
L0001765, 490452.6 3611838.9 -28.03
L0001765, 490472.6 3611838.9 -32.46
L0001765, 490492.6 3611838.9 -19.47'
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 20 Page 136 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 13
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
SOURCE-RECEPTOR COMBINATIONS FOR WHICH CALCULATIONS MAY NOT BE PERFORMED
LESS THAN 1.0 METER; WITHIN OPENPIT; OR BEYOND 80KM, FOR FASTAREA/FASTALL
SOURCE - - RECEPTOR LOCATION - - DISTANCE
ID XR (METERS) YR (METERS) (METERS)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0001765, 490512.6 3611838.9 -1.45
L0001765, 490432.6 3611858.9 0.22
L0001765, 490452.6 3611858.9 -10.66
L0001765, 490472.6 3611858.9 -12.96
L0001765, 490492.6 3611858.9 -5.31
L0001766 490412.6 3611838.9 0.32
L0001766 490432.6 3611838.9 -13.25
L0001766 490452.6 3611838.9 -18.88
L0001766 490472.6 3611838.9 -12.7'7'
L0001766 490412.6 3611858.9 -8.92
L0001766 490432.6 3611858.9 -27'.51
L0001766 490452.6 3611858.9 -38.87'
L0001766 490472.6 3611858.9 -26.7'3
L0001766 490492.6 3611858.9 -8.06
L0001766 490412.6 3611878.9 -9.47'
L0001766 490432.6 3611878.9 -28.54
L0001766 490452.6 3611878.9 -41.12
L0001766 490472.6 3611878.9 -27'.7'2
L0001766 490492.6 3611878.9 -8.60
L0001766 490412.6 3611898.9 -1.04
L0001766 490432.6 3611898.9 -15.14
L0001766 490452.6 3611898.9 -21.13
L0001766 490472.6 3611898.9 -14.63
L0001766 490492.6 3611898.9 -0.31
L0001766 490452.6 3611918.9 -1.13
L0001767 490412.6 3611878.9 -3.94
L0001767 490432.6 3611878.9 -10.85
L0001767 490452.6 3611878.9 -8.24
L0001767 490392.6 3611898.9 -1.47'
L0001767 490412.6 3611898.9 -18.90
L0001767 490432.6 3611898.9 -30.55
L0001767 490452.6 3611898.9 -25.7'2
L0001767 490472.6 3611898.9 -10.00
L0001767 490392.6 3611918.9 -5.27'
L0001767 490412.6 3611918.9 -25.26
L0001767 490432.6 3611918.9 -45.16
L0001767 490452.6 3611918.9 -34.69
L0001767 490472.6 3611918.9 -14.7'1
L0001767 490392.6 3611938.9 -0.55
L0001767 490412.6 3611938.9 -17'.49
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 21 Page 137 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 14
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
SOURCE-RECEPTOR COMBINATIONS FOR WHICH CALCULATIONS MAY NOT BE PERFORMED
LESS THAN 1.0 METER; WITHIN OPENPIT; OR BEYOND 80KM, FOR FASTAREA/FASTALL
SOURCE - - RECEPTOR LOCATION - - DISTANCE
ID XR (METERS) YR (METERS) (METERS)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0001767 490432.6 3611938.9 -28.37'
L0001767 490452.6 3611938.9 -23.94
L0001767 490472.6 3611938.9 -8.89
L0001767 490412.6 3611958.9 -2.03
L0001767 490432.6 3611958.9 -8.62
L0001767 490452.6 3611958.9 -6.14
L0001768 490412.6 3611918.9 -2.34
L0001768 490432.6 3611918.9 -2.30
L0001768 490392.6 3611938.9 -9.98
L0001768 490412.6 3611938.9 -21.60
L0001768 490432.6 3611938.9 -21.53
L0001768 490452.6 3611938.9 -9.82
L0001768 490372.6 3611958.9 0.32
L0001768 490392.6 3611958.9 -19.39
L0001768 490412.6 3611958.9 -38.10
L0001768 490432.6 3611958.9 -37'.92
L0001768 490452.6 3611958.9 -19.18
L0001768 490472.6 3611958.9 0.53
L0001768 490392.6 3611978.9 -17'.26
L0001768 490412.6 3611978.9 -33.38
L0001768 490432.6 3611978.9 -33.25
L0001768 490452.6 3611978.9 _17.07,
L0001768 490392.6 3611998.9 -5.21
L0001768 490412.6 3611998.9 -15.20
L0001768 490432.6 3611998.9 -15.14
L0001768 490452.6 3611998.9 -5.06
L0001769 490372.6 3611978.9 -0.90
L0001769 490392.6 3611978.9 -12.47'
L0001769 490412.6 3611978.9 -15.28
L0001769 490432.6 3611978.9 -7'.54
L0001769 490372.6 3611998.9 -12.11
L0001769 490392.6 3611998.9 -29.18
L0001769 490412.6 3611998.9 -34.81
L0001769 490432.6 3611998.9 -21.23
L0001769 490452.6 3611998.9 -2.83
L0001769 490372.6 3612018.9 -14.50
L0001769 490392.6 3612018.9 -33.93
L0001769 490412.6 3612018.9 -42.53
L0001769 490432.6 3612018.9 -24.45
L0001769 490452.6 3612018.9 -4.7'2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 22 Page 138 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 15,
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
SOURCE-RECEPTOR COMBINATIONS FOR WHICH CALCULATIONS MAY NOT BE PERFORMED
LESS THAN 1.0 METER; WITHIN OPENPIT; OR BEYOND 80KM, FOR FASTAREA/FASTALL
SOURCE - - RECEPTOR LOCATION - - DISTANCE
ID XR (METERS) YR (METERS) (METERS)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0001769 490372.6 3612038.9 -6.58
L0001769 490392.6 3612038.9 -20.29
L0001769 490412.6 3612038.9 -23.92
L0001769 490432.6 3612038.9 -14.26
L0001769 490392.6 3612058.9 -1.96
L0001769 490412.6 3612058.9 -4.12
L0001770 490372.6 3612018.9 -3.27'
L0001770 490392.6 3612018.9 -7'.88
L0001770 490412.6 3612018.9 -3.47'
L0001770 490352.6 3612038.9 -4.09
L0001770 490372.6 3612038.9 -20.02
L0001770 490392.6 3612038.9 -27'.88
L0001770 490412.6 3612038.9 -20.34
L0001770 490432.6 3612038.9 -4.50
L0001770 490352.6 3612058.9 -9.7'2
L0001770 490372.6 3612058.9 -29.66
L0001770 490392.6 3612058.9 -47.87
L0001770 490412.6 3612058.9 -30.13
L0001770 490432.6 3612058.9 -10.19
L0001771 490372.6 3612058.9 0.16
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 23 Page 139 of 208
AERMOD — VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET — VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 16
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
METEOROLOGICAL DAYS SELECTED FOR PROCESSING
(1=YES- O=NO)
NOTE: METEOROLOGICAL DATA ACTUALLY PROCESSED WILL ALSO DEPEND ON WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE DATA FILE.
UPPER BOUND OF FIRST THROUGH FIFTH WIND SPEED CATEGORIES
(METERS/SEC)
1.54f 3.09r 5.14r 8.23r 10.80r
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 24 Page 140 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 17
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
*** UP TO THE FIRST 24 HOURS OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA
Surface file: N:\AIR GHG NOISE Technical\001 AIR\Analysis Models\Lakes\Met Data\AERMOD MET1564 Met Version: 14134
Profile file: N:\AIR GHG-NOISE-Technical\001-AIR\Analysis-Models\Lakes\Met Data\AERMOD-MET1564
Surface format: FREE
Profile format: FREE
Surface station no. : 23188 Upper air station no. : 3190
Name: SAN-DIEGO/LINDBERGH-FIELD Name: UNKNOWN
Year: 2008 Year: 2008
First 24 hours of scalar data
YR MO DY JDY HR HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS WD HT REF TA HT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
08 01 01 1 01 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 282.5 2.0
08 01 01 1 02 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 282.0 2.0
08 01 01 1 03 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 281.4 2.0
08 01 01 1 04 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 280.9 2.0
08 01 01 1 05, -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 280.4 2.0
08 01 01 1 06 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 280.4 2.0
08 01 01 1 07 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 280.4 2.0
08 01 01 1 08 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 0.50 0.00 0. 10.0 281.4 2.0
08 01 01 1 09 19.4 0.239 0.297 0.007 49. 280. -63.8 0.13 1.15 0.30 2.36 337. 10.0 283.8 2.0
08 01 01 1 10 19.3 0.188 0.334 0.006 70. 19 7'. -31.4 0.13 1.15 0.23 1.76 341. 10.0 287.0 2.0
08 01 01 1 11 63.2 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 152. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 0.21 0.00 0. 10.0 290.4 2.0
08 01 01 1 12 71.9 0.255 0.811 0.007 269. 309. -20.9 0.12 1.15 0.20 2.36 306. 10.0 292.0 2.0
08 01 01 1 13 71.0 0.336 0.939 0.009 424. 4 67'. -48.5 0.12 1.15 0.20 3.36 313. 10.0 292.5 2.0
08 01 01 1 14 60.7 0.251 0.955 0.010 521. 306. -23.8 0.12 1.15 0.21 2.36 319. 10.0 292.5 2.0
08 01 01 1 is, 41.9 0.251 0.875 0.011 5 7'9. 301. -34.1 0.13 1.15 0.24 2.36 332. 10.0 293.1 2.0
08 01 01 1 16 23.6 0.186 0.735 0.011 610. 194. -24.9 0.12 1.15 0.33 1.76 304. 10.0 293.8 2.0
08 01 01 1 17 11.2 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.14 1.15 0.60 0.00 0. 10.0 289.9 2.0
08 01 01 1 18 -1.2 0.040 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 19. 5.0 0.12 1.15 1.00 0.90 312. 10.0 288.8 2.0
08 01 01 1 19 -2.2 0.055 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 31. 7.0 0.15 1.15 1.00 1.16 7. 10.0 288.1 2.0
08 01 01 1 20 -3.1 0.066 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 41. 8.5 0.15 1.15 1.00 1.40 2. 10.0 287.5 2.0
08 01 01 1 21 -1.7 0.050 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 2 7'. 6.4 0.16 1.15 1.00 1.03 34. 10.0 286,.4 2.0
08 01 01 1 22 -4.2 0.073 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 48. 8.6 0.13 1.15 1.00 1.59 341. 10.0 285.4 2.0
08 01 01 1 23 -4.0 0.068 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 42. 7.1 0.15 1.15 1.00 1.43 16. 10.0 284.9 2.0
08 01 01 1 24 -3.1 0.065 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 40. 8.2 0.13 1.15 1.00 1.42 342. 10.0 283.8 2.0
First hour of profile data
YR MO DY HR HEIGHT F WDIR WSPD AMB TMP sigmaA sigmaW sigmaV
08 01 01 01 10.0 1 -999. -99.00 282.6 99.0 -99.00 -99.00
F indicates top of profile (=1) or below (=O)
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 2S Page 141 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 18
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES AVERAGED OVER 6 YEARS FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) : L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 f L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
0
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 . NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490352.65 490372.65 490392. 65 490412.65 490432.65 490452.65 490472.6,5 490492.65 490512.65
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.88 0.06874 0.05582 0.07'27'5 0.06808 0.07525 0.07974 0.06539 0.0556,8 0.04860
3612038.88 0.06222 0.05990 0.06235 0.06200 0.05948 0.08578 0.06939 0.05854 0.05078
3612018.88 0.07283 0.05405 0.057'93 0.06078 0.08212 0.07231 0.07395 0.06,16,9 0.05315
3611998.88 0.06807 0.06725 0.06490 0.06584 0.06343 0.05933 0.07908 0.06,519 0.05572
3611978.88 0.06398 0.06316 0.057'24 0.06009 0.06112 0.08084 0.08511 0.06,911 0.05853
361195,8.88 0.06046 0.06258 0.07'345 0.07067 0.06931 0.06457 0.07185 0.07353 0.06163
3611938.88 0.05742 0.06970 0.05697' 0.06080 0.06230 0.06152 0.07874 0.07857 0.06505
3611918.88 0.05474 0.06541 0.06877 0.05641 0.06066 0.07245 0.07833 0.08438 0.06889
3611898.88 0.05237 0.06179 0.06219 0.06166 0.06475 0.06450 0.06190 0.07586, 0.07320
3611878.88 0.05025 0.05865 0.07'128 0.05517 0.05897 0.06169 0.08630 0.07594 0.07814
361185,8.88 0.04834 0.05590 0.06689 0.06738 0.06730 0.06904 0.06658 0.06,220 0.08371
3611838.88 0.04660 0.05347 0.06317' 0.06273 0.05874 0.06171 0.06276 0.08574 0.07349
3611818.88 0.04502 0.05131 0.05993 0.07295 0.07397 0.08396 0.07346 0.06,834 0.07517
3611798.88 0.04357 0.04936 0.057'12 0.06850 0.06717 0.06284 0.06461 0.06,386, 0.08396
3611778.88 0.04223 0.04759 0.05464 0.06461 0.06881 0.05746 0.06141 0.06,393 0.08204
361175,8.88 0.04100 0.04599 0.05243 0.06130 0.07485 0.07236 0.06756 0.06,76,2 0.06493
3611738.88 0.03987 0.04452 0.05045 0.05842 0.07016 0.05660 0.06058 0.06,324 0.06388
3611718.88 0.03882 0.04317 0.04866 0.05589 0.06618 0.06781 0.07861 0.07287 0.07059
3611698.88 0.03785 0.04194 0.047'04 0.05364 0.06279 0.07690 0.06068 0.06,404 0.06520
3611678.88 0.03695 0.04080 0.04556 0.05164 0.05984 0.07198 0.07473 0.06,06,5 0.05282
361165,8.88 0.03612 0.03975 0.04421 0.04984 0.05728 0.06794 0.06765 0.06,553 0.06789
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 26 Page 142 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 19
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES AVERAGED OVER 6 YEARS FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) : L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 f L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
0
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 . NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490532.65 490552.65 49057'2. 65 490592.65 490612.65 490632.65 490652.6,5 490672.65 490692.65
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.88 0.04318 0.03888 0.03540 0.03253 0.03012 0.02806 0.02629 0.02474 0.02337
3612038.88 0.04491 0.04031 0.03661 0.03357 0.03102 0.02887 0.02701 0.02539 0.02396
3612018.88 0.04678 0.04183 0.037'88 0.03466 0.03197 0.02971 0.02776 0.026,07 0.02458
3611998.88 0.04878 0.04345 0.03923 0.03580 0.03297 0.03058 0.02855 0.026,78 0.02523
3611978.88 0.05094 0.04518 0.04065 0.03701 0.03401 0.03150 0.02936 0.02752 0.02590
361195,8.88 0.05327 0.04703 0.04217' 0.03829 0.03511 0.03246 0.03022 0.02829 0.02660
3611938.88 0.05581 0.04901 0.0437'9 0.03964 0.03627 0.03348 0.03112 0.02909 0.02733
3611918.88 0.05858 0.05116 0.04551 0.04107 0.03749 0.03454 0.03206 0.02994 0.02809
3611898.88 0.06163 0.05347 0.047'36 0.04260 0.03879 0.03566 0.03305 0.03082 0.02889
3611878.88 0.06501 0.05599 0.04935 0.04422 0.04016 0.03684 0.03409 0.03175 0.02972
361185,8.88 0.06877 0.05874 0.05149 0.04596 0.04161 0.03810 0.03518 0.03272 0.03060
3611838.88 0.07300 0.06176 0.05380 0.04782 0.04316 0.03942 0.03634 0.03375 0.03153
3611818.88 0.07781 0.06510 0.05632 0.04983 0.04482 0.04083 0.03757 0.03484 0.03250
3611798.88 0.08328 0.06881 0.05906 0.05198 0.04659 0.04233 0.03887 0.03599 0.03353
3611778.88 0.07225 0.07299 0.06207' 0.05432 0.04849 0.04393 0.04026 0.03721 0.03462
361175,8.88 0.08107 0.07770 0.06539 0.05686 0.05054 0.04565 0.04173 0.03851 0.03578
3611738.88 0.08037 0.08313 0.06909 0.05963 0.05275 0.04749 0.04331 0.03989 0.03701
3611718.88 0.06589 0.08925 0.07'323 0.06267 0.05515 0.04947 0.04500 0.04137 0.03832
3611698.88 0.06411 0.07839 0.07'7'92 0.06602 0.05776 0.05161 0.04682 0.04295 0.03972
3611678.88 0.07330 0.07935 0.08328 0.06976 0.06061 0.05393 0.04879 0.0446,5 0.04122
361165,8.88 0.06728 0.06460 0.08933 0.07393 0.06374 0.05646 0.05091 0.046,49 0.04284
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 27 Page 143 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 20
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES AVERAGED OVER 6 YEARS FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) : L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 f L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
0
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 . NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490712.65 490732.65 4907'52. 65
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.88 0.02214 0.02104 0.02003
3612038.88 0.02269 0.02154 0.02050
3612018.88 0.02326 0.02207 0.02099
3611998.88 0.02385 0.02261 0.02149
3611978.88 0.02446 0.02317 0.02201
361195,8.88 0.02510 0.02376 0.02255
3611938.88 0.02577 0.02437 0.02311
3611918.88 0.02646 0.02501 0.0237'0
3611898.88 0.02719 0.02567 0.02431
3611878.88 0.02795 0.02637 0.02495
361185,8.88 0.02875 0.02710 0.02562
3611838.88 0.02958 0.02786 0.02632
3611818.88 0.03047 0.02866 0.027'05
3611798.88 0.03140 0.02951 0.027'82
3611778.88 0.03238 0.03040 0.02864
361175,8.88 0.03342 0.03135 0.02950
3611738.88 0.03452 0.03234 0.03041
3611718.88 0.03570 0.03341 0.03137'
3611698.88 0.03695 0.03454 0.03239
3611678.88 0.03830 0.03574 0.03348
361165,8.88 0.03974 0.03704 0.03465
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 28 Page 144 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 21
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES AVERAGED OVER 6 YEARS FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) : L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 f L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
*** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
490591.07 3611906.64 0.04232 490579.82 3611883.66 0.04691
490581.32 3611866.22 0.04819 490582.74 3611846.33 0.04980
490584.89 3611827.84 0.05114 490587.29 3611809.01 0.05250
490589.69 3611789.79 0.05398 490591.69 3611769.76 0.05579
490628.75, 3611918.59 0.03509 490634.93 3611899.66 0.03530
49065,6.13 3611858.19 0.03477 490675.45 3611865.73 0.03207
490643.41 3611809.18 0.03966 490690.53 3611819.55 0.03270
490642.47 3611787.51 0.04138 490635.87 3611847.35 0.03833
490630.88 3611842.25 0.03949 490630.88 3611852.25 0.03882
490640.88 3611842.25 0.03787 490640.88 3611852.25 0.03724
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, 29 Page 145 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 22
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE 1ST HIGHEST 1-HR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
0
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 . NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490352.65 490372. 65 490392.65 490412.65 490432.6,5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.9 1.12831 (11120504) 1.4607'5 (10110601) 1.55206 (10110601) 1.48153 (101106,01) 1.27408 (10110601)
3612038.9 1.15064 (11120504) 1.30282 (10110601) 1.57367 (10110601) 1.58626 (101106,01) 1.33905 (10110601)
3612018.9 1.17469 (11120504) 1.22149 (10110601) 1.56910 (10110601) 1.68411 (101106,01) 1.49547 (10110601)
3611998.9 1.17479 (11120504) 1.17697 (11120504) 1.42206 (10110601) 1.60883 (101106,01) 1.51450 (10110601)
3611978.9 1.17139 (11120504) 1.20356 (11120504) 1.36170 (10110601) 1.64215 (101106,01) 1.63408 (10110601)
361195,8.9 1.17532 (11120504) 1.19310 (11120504) 1.29447 (10110601) 1.51952 (101106,01) 1.60601 (10110601)
3611938.9 1.17882 (11120504) 1.2247'1 (11120504) 1.15593 (11120504) 1.48829 (101106,01) 1.67431 (10110601)
3611918.9 1.18064 (11120504) 1.23367' (11120504) 1.22570 (11120504) 1.42966 (101106,01) 1.72068 (10110601)
3611898.9 1.17933 (11120504) 1.24056 (11120504) 1.25829 (11120504) 1.27049 (101106,01) 1.59059 (10110601)
3611878.9 1.17176 (11120504) 1.24483 (11120504) 1.29443 (11120504) 1.22288 (11120504) 1.56524 (10110601)
361185,8.9 1.15547 (11120504) 1.24690 (11120504) 1.30724 (11120504) 1.29763 (11120504) 1.41225 (10110601)
3611838.9 1.12835 (11120504) 1.24201 (11120504) 1.31427 (11120504) 1.33733 (11120504) 1.33362 (10110601)
3611818.9 1.08881 (11120504) 1.227'30 (11120504) 1.32126 (11120504) 1.37776 (11120504) 1.31959 (11120504)
3611798.9 1.03621 (11120504) 1.20021 (11120504) 1.32003 (11120504) 1.39434 (11120504) 1.38602 (11120504)
3611778.9 0.97097 (11120504) 1.15866 (11120504) 1.30745 (11120504) 1.40285 (11120504) 1.40148 (11120504)
361175,8.9 0.89468 (11120504) 1.1017'8 (11120504) 1.28074 (11120504) 1.40698 (11120504) 1.47788 (11120504)
3611738.9 0.80999 (11120504) 1.03010 (11120504) 1.23696 (11120504) 1.39723 (11120504) 1.49133 (11120504)
3611718.9 0.72029 (11120504) 0.94564 (11120504) 1.17504 (11120504) 1.37150 (11120504) 1.50395 (11120504)
3611698.9 0.67105 (09012002) 0.8517'2 (11120504) 1.09568 (11120504) 1.32528 (11120504) 1.49975 (11120504)
3611678.9 0.62850 (09012002) 0.75261 (11120504) 1.00147 (11120504) 1.25730 (11120504) 1.47438 (11120504)
361165,8.9 0.58109 (09012002) 0.69824 (09012002) 0.89672 (11120504) 1.16862 (11120504) 1.42552 (11120504)
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, �30 Page 146 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 23
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE 1ST HIGHEST 1-HR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
0
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 . NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490452.65 490472. 65 490492.65 490512.65 490532.6,5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.9 0.94388 (10110601) 0.69216 (12011206) 0.62268 (12011206) 0.57107 (100216,24) 0.57058 (12122504)
3612038.9 1.05516 (10110601) 0.75181 (10110601) 0.64667 (12011206) 0.58751 (100216,24) 0.578,69 (12122504)
3612018.9 1.14039 (10110601) 0.83499 (10110601) 0.67241 (12011206) 0.60495 (100216,24) 0.58713 (12122504)
3611998.9 1.21853 (10110601) 0.93262 (10110601) 0.70056 (12011206) 0.62876 (12011206,) 0.59592 (12122504)
3611978.9 1.37012 (10110601) 1.03290 (10110601) 0.73445 (10110601) 0.65434 (12011206,) 0.60512 (12122504)
361195,8.9 1.42086 (10110601) 1.13926 (10110601) 0.82090 (10110601) 0.68189 (12011206,) 0.61970 (10021624)
3611938.9 1.55214 (10110601) 1.2417'2 (10110601) 0.92054 (10110601) 0.71174 (12011206,) 0.64021 (10021624)
3611918.9 1.56896 (10110601) 1.38501 (10110601) 1.02522 (10110601) 0.74355 (12011206,) 0.66371 (12011206)
3611898.9 1.66575 (10110601) 1.44877 (10110601) 1.11469 (10110601) 0.80481 (101106,01) 0.69364 (12011206)
3611878.9 1.74968 (10110601) 1.61200 (10110601) 1.24806 (10110601) 0.90147 (101106,01) 0.72561 (12011206)
361185,8.9 1.66074 (10110601) 1.62120 (10110601) 1.33248 (10110601) 1.01617 (101106,01) 0.76059 (12011206)
3611838.9 1.67400 (10110601) 1.73512 (10110601) 1.49837 (10110601) 1.11299 (101106,01) 0.79904 (12011206)
3611818.9 1.67264 (10110601) 1.69496 (10110601) 1.54737 (10110601) 1.25597 (101106,01) 0.88565 (10110601)
3611798.9 1.48831 (10110601) 1.747'64 (10110601) 1.68254 (10110601) 1.37112 (101106,01) 1.00455 (10110601)
3611778.9 1.40750 (10110601) 1.77237 (10110601) 1.81620 (10110601) 1.53153 (101106,01) 1.11035 (10110601)
361175,8.9 1.41726 (11120504) 1.62963 (10110601) 1.78230 (10110601) 1.59882 (101106,01) 1.23435 (10110601)
3611738.9 1.42496 (11120504) 1.57'87'8 (10110601) 1.85138 (10110601) 1.75458 (101106,01) 1.39101 (10110601)
3611718.9 1.51673 (11120504) 1.51019 (10110601) 1.74861 (10110601) 1.77763 (101106,01) 1.48925 (10110601)
3611698.9 1.58475 (11120504) 1.44210 (11120504) 1.73695 (10110601) 1.88802 (101106,01) 1.658,70 (10110601)
3611678.9 1.61145 (11120504) 1.57'524 (11120504) 1.68736 (10110601) 1.82066 (101106,01) 1.73430 (10110601)
361165,8.9 1.61539 (11120504) 1.65916 (11120504) 1.50201 (10110601) 1.87235 (101106,01) 1.88088 (10110601)
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, �3 1 Page 147 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 24
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE 1ST HIGHEST 1-HR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
0
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 . NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490552.65 490572. 65 490592.65 490612.65 490632.6,5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.9 0.59276 (12122504) 0.62054 (12122504) 0.64350 (12122504) 0.65180 (12122504) 0.63922 (12122504)
3612038.9 0.60094 (12122504) 0.63005 (12122504) 0.65494 (12122504) 0.66499 (12122504) 0.65333 (12122504)
3612018.9 0.60931 (12122504) 0.6 3 9 7'5 (12122504) 0.66669 (12122504) 0.67861 (12122504) 0.66796 (12122504)
3611998.9 0.61789 (12122504) 0.64965 (12122504) 0.67873 (12122504) 0.69267 (12122504) 0.68312 (12122504)
3611978.9 0.62668 (12122504) 0.6 5 9 7'4 (12122504) 0.69109 (12122504) 0.70720 (12122504) 0.698,85 (12122504)
361195,8.9 0.63571 (12122504) 0.6 7'0 0 5 (12122504) 0.70377 (12122504) 0.72221 (12122504) 0.71517 (12122504)
3611938.9 0.64501 (12122504) 0.68056 (12122504) 0.71679 (12122504) 0.73773 (12122504) 0.73213 (12122504)
3611918.9 0.65460 (12122504) 0.69130 (12122504) 0.73015 (12122504) 0.75379 (12122504) 0.74975 (12122504)
3611898.9 0.66452 (12122504) 0.70226 (12122504) 0.74385 (12122504) 0.77041 (12122504) 0.768,08 (12122504)
3611878.9 0.67481 (12122504) 0.71345 (12122504) 0.75792 (12122504) 0.78762 (12122504) 0.78715 (12122504)
361185,8.9 0.68552 (12122504) 0.72489 (12122504) 0.77236 (12122504) 0.80545 (12122504) 0.80702 (12122504)
3611838.9 0.71059 (10021624) 0.73659 (12122504) 0.78718 (12122504) 0.82394 (12122504) 0.82774 (12122504)
3611818.9 0.74280 (12011206) 0.74856 (12122504) 0.80239 (12122504) 0.84312 (12122504) 0.84937 (12122504)
3611798.9 0.78150 (12011206) 0.76084 (12122504) 0.81800 (12122504) 0.86304 (12122504) 0.87196 (12122504)
3611778.9 0.82234 (12011206) 0.77'339 (12122504) 0.83402 (12122504) 0.88374 (12122504) 0.89559 (12122504)
361175,8.9 0.86841 (12011206) 0.78641 (12122504) 0.85045 (12122504) 0.90526 (12122504) 0.92034 (12122504)
3611738.9 0.98055 (10110601) 0.807'86 (10021624) 0.86731 (12122504) 0.92765 (12122504) 0.94630 (12122504)
3611718.9 1.11997 (10110601) 0.85234 (12011206) 0.88459 (12122504) 0.95098 (12122504) 0.97355 (12122504)
3611698.9 1.23872 (10110601) 0.90467' (12011206) 0.90236 (12122504) 0.97529 (12122504) 1.00222 (12122504)
3611678.9 1.41190 (10110601) 0.957'7'6 (10110601) 0.92032 (12122504) 1.00066 (12122504) 1.03243 (12122504)
361165,8.9 1.53203 (10110601) 1.10454 (10110601) 0.93913 (12122504) 1.02717 (12122504) 1.06432 (12122504)
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, �32 Page 148 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 25,
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE 1ST HIGHEST 1-HR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
0
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 . NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490652.65 490672. 65 490692.65 490712.65 490732.6,5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.9 0.65721 (12020924) 0.68231 (12020924) 0.68312 (12020924) 0.65919 (12020924) 0.62271 (12091501)
3612038.9 0.66985 (12020924) 0.69552 (12020924) 0.69577 (12020924) 0.67042 (12020924) 0.63401 (12091501)
3612018.9 0.68297 (12020924) 0.70919 (12020924) 0.70880 (12020924) 0.68195 (12020924) 0.64552 (12091501)
3611998.9 0.69659 (12020924) 0.72336 (12020924) 0.72224 (12020924) 0.69377 (12020924) 0.65724 (12091501)
3611978.9 0.71075 (12020924) 0.73804 (12020924) 0.73609 (12020924) 0.70591 (12020924) 0.66915 (12091501)
361195,8.9 0.72548 (12020924) 0.75326 (12020924) 0.75037 (12020924) 0.71836 (12020924) 0.68125 (12091501)
3611938.9 0.74081 (12020924) 0.76904 (12020924) 0.76509 (12020924) 0.73113 (12020924) 0.69353 (12091501)
3611918.9 0.75678 (12020924) 0.78541 (12020924) 0.78027 (12020924) 0.74423 (12020924) 0.70598 (12091501)
3611898.9 0.77342 (12020924) 0.80240 (12020924) 0.79592 (12020924) 0.75766 (12020924) 0.718,58 (12091501)
3611878.9 0.79080 (12020924) 0.82003 (12020924) 0.81204 (12020924) 0.77144 (12020924) 0.73132 (12091501)
361185,8.9 0.80894 (12020924) 0.83834 (12020924) 0.82866 (12020924) 0.78556 (12020924) 0.74420 (12091501)
3611838.9 0.82790 (12020924) 0.857'36 (12020924) 0.84577 (12020924) 0.80004 (12020924) 0.75720 (12091501)
3611818.9 0.84774 (12020924) 0.8 7'7'11 (12020924) 0.86340 (12020924) 0.81488 (12020924) 0.77032 (12091501)
3611798.9 0.86852 (12020924) 0.897'63 (12020924) 0.88154 (12020924) 0.83010 (12020924) 0.78353 (12091501)
3611778.9 0.89029 (12020924) 0.91894 (12020924) 0.90021 (12020924) 0.84569 (12020924) 0.79684 (12091501)
361175,8.9 0.91314 (12020924) 0.94108 (12020924) 0.91940 (12020924) 0.86169 (12020924) 0.81026 (12091501)
3611738.9 0.93714 (12020924) 0.96408 (12020924) 0.93913 (12020924) 0.87809 (12020924) 0.82378 (12091501)
3611718.9 0.96236 (12020924) 0.987'96 (12020924) 0.95940 (12020924) 0.89492 (12020924) 0.83742 (12091501)
3611698.9 0.98890 (12020924) 1.0127'3 (12020924) 0.98021 (12020924) 0.91220 (12020924) 0.85120 (12091501)
3611678.9 1.01685 (12020924) 1.03843 (12020924) 1.00155 (12020924) 0.92996 (12020924) 0.86516 (12091501)
361165,8.9 1.04630 (12020924) 1.06505 (12020924) 1.02343 (12020924) 0.94823 (12020924) 0.87934 (12091501)
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, �3�3 Page 149 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 26
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE 1ST HIGHEST 1-HR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
0
NETWORK ID*. UCART1 . NETWORK TYPE: GRID�CART
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
Y-COORD X-COORD, (METERS)
(METERS) 490752.65
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
361205,8.9 0.61194 (12091501)
3612038.9 0.62127 (12091501)
3612018.9 0.63070 (12091501)
3611998.9 0.64022 (12091501)
3611978.9 0.64983 (12091501)
361195,8.9 0.65952 (12091501)
3611938.9 0.66929 (12091501)
3611918.9 0.67913 (12091501)
3611898.9 0.68904 (12091501)
3611878.9 0.69902 (12091501)
361185,8.9 0.70907 (12091501)
3611838.9 0.71921 (12091501)
3611818.9 0.72943 (12091501)
3611798.9 0.73975 (12091501)
3611778.9 0.75020 (12091501)
361175,8.9 0.76079 (12091501)
3611738.9 0.77155 (12091501)
3611718.9 0.78253 (12091501)
3611698.9 0.79374 (12091501)
3611678.9 0.80525 (12091501)
361165,8.9 0.81709 (12091501)
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, �34 Page 150 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 27
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE 1ST HIGHEST 1-HR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL
INCLUDING SOURCE(S) L0001738 r L00017'39 f L0001740 L0001741 L0001742
L0001743 f L0001744 r L0001745 r L00017'46 f L0001747 f L0001748 f L0001749 f L0001750 f
L000175,1 f L0001752 r L0001753 r L00017'54 f L0001755 f L0001756 f L0001757 f L0001758 f
L000175,9 f L0001760 r L0001761 r L00017'62 f L0001763 f L0001764 f L0001765 f . . .
*** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC (YYMMD�D�HH) X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC (YYMMDDHH)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
490591.07 3611906.64 0.73562 (12122504) 490579.82 3611883.66 0.72690 (12122504)
490581.32 3611866.22 0.74116 (12122504) 490582.74 3611846.33 0.75741 (12122504)
490584.89 3611827.84 0.77538 (12122504) 490587.29 3611809.01 0.79524 (12122504)
490589.69 3611789.79 0.81651 (12122504) 490591.69 3611769.76 0.83843 (12122504)
490628.75, 3611918.59 0.75327 (12122504) 490634.93 3611899.66 0.76496 (12122504)
49065,6.13 3611858.19 0.81747 (12020924) 490675.45 3611865.73 0.83300 (12020924)
490643.41 3611809.18 0.84641 (12122504) 490690.53 3611819.55 0.86609 (12020924)
490642.47 3611787.51 0.87356 (12122504) 490635.87 3611847.35 0.81572 (12122504)
490630.88 3611842.25 0.82546 (12122504) 490630.88 3611852.25 0.81512 (12122504)
490640.88 3611842.25 0.81424 (12122504) 490640.88 3611852.25 0.80371 (12122504)
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, �3 S Page 151 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 28
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
THE SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM ANNUAL RESULTS AVERAGED OVER 6 YEARS
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
NETWORK
GROUP ID AVERAGE CONC RECEPTOR (XR, YR. ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) OF TYPE GRID-ID
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ALL 1ST HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08933 AT 49057�2.65f 3611658.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
2ND HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08925 AT 490552. 65f 3611718.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
3RD HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08630 AT 49047�2. 65f 3611878.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
4TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08578 AT 490452. 65f 3612038.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
STH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08574 AT 490492. 65f 3611838.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
6TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08511 AT 49047�2. 65f 3611978.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
7TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08438 AT 490492. 65f 3611918.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
8TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08396 AT 490452. 65f 3611818.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
9TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08396 AT 490512. 65f 3611798.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
10TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08371 AT 490512. 65f 3611858.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
RECEPTOR TYPES: GC = GRIDCART
GP = GRIDPOLR
DC = DISCCART
DP = DISCPOLR
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, �36 Page 152 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 29
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
*** THE SUMMARY OF HIGHEST 1-HR RESULTS
CONC OF PM-10 IN MICROGRAMS/M**3
DATE NETWORK
GROUP ID AVERAGE CONC (YYMMD�D�HH) RECEPTOR (XR, YR. ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) OF TYPE GRID-ID
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ALL HIGH 1ST HIGH VALUE IS 1.88802 ON 10110601: AT 490512.65f 3611698.88f 1.00f 1.00f 5.00) GC UCART1
RECEPTOR TYPES: GC = GRIDCART
GP = GRIDPOLR
DC = DISCCART
DP = DISCPOLR
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, �37 Page 153 of 208
AERMOD - VERSION 14134 C:\AERMOD�\7'937\701 D St\701 D St.isc 10/09/15
AERMET - VERSION 14134 07:41:45
PAGE 30
**MODELOPTs*. NonDFAULT CONC FLAT FLGPOL
*** Message Summary : AERMOD Model Execution
--------- Summary of Total Messages --------
• Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s)
• Total of 1 Warning Message (s)
• Total of 891 Informational Message (s)
• Total of 52608 Hours Were Processed
• Total of 626 Calm Hours Identified
• Total of 265 Missing Hours Identified 0.50 Percent)
FATAL ERROR MESSAGES
*** NONE ***
WARNING MESSAGES
CO W320 22 URBOPT: Input Parameter May Be Out-of-Range for Parameter URB-POP
AERMOD Finishes Successfully
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, �38 Page 154 of 208
Non-'T VMT 75847908.35
DSL VMT 985948.0211
GAS VMT 74861960-33
DSL 1.3%
GAS 98.7%
VMT @ Average Average
Speed VMT Speed DSLVM'T DSL Ratio Gas Ratio DS�L GAS Combined
Ratio PM10 EF PM10 EF �
5 131,133.0 0.2% 41019.1 0.0% 0.2% 01.19550 0.010146 01.20596
10 3671656.5 0.5% 1318 7 1.3 0.0% 0.5% 0.15519 0.001668 0.16187
15 897,808.7 1.2% 25,421.1 0.0% 1.2% 01.11004 0.0014501 01.11�454
20 2)9 1719117.6 3.9% 1161326.5 0.2% 3.7% 01.07928 0.001319 0.08247
25 81717,036.3 11.6% 98,954.2 0.1% 11.5% 0.06450 0.001239 01.06689
30 7)4001459.6 9.9% 881412.1 0.�1% 9.8% 0.05555 0.00188 0.05743
35 81427,511.4 11.3% 100,281.6 0.1% 11.1% 0.04950 0.00156 0.05107"
40 5)338,305.2 '7.1% 691691.4 0.�1% 7.0% 0.04597 0.00137 01.04734
45 31622,267.6 4.8% 47,183.8 0.1% �4.8% 0.04475 0.00126 0.04601
50 2)6061119.2 3.5% 371574.8 0.1% 3.4% 01.04572 0.00122 01.04694
55 21095,544.8 2.8% 39,610.6 0.1% 2.7% 0.04889 0.00125 0.05014
60 2)3061047.8 3.1% 441005.7 0.1% 3.0% 0.05405 0.00134 0.05539
65 30,034,152.7 40.1% 300,595.9 0.4% 39.7% 01.05758 0.001 1401 01.05897
70 0.0 0 0 0 0, 0 0, 0
75 0.0 0 0 0 01 0 0, 0
80 0.01 0 0 0 Oil 0 Oil 0
85� 0.0 0 0 0 01 0 01 0
90 0.0 0 0 0 oil 0 01 0
1
74,861,960.3 100.0% 985,948.0 1.3% 98.7%
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 155 of 208
'Tl VMT 1881018.254
Ratio to'To 0.023250417
DSL 1086771.408
GAS 794246.8454
DSL 57.8%
GAS 42.2%
VMT @ Average DS,L Average GAS,
S p e e VMT Sp�eed Ratio DSL VMT DSL Ratio Gas Ratio PM10 EF PM10 EF Combined
5 41,650.5 2.2% 19,110.4 1.0% 1.2% 0.043115 0.043115 0.086230
10 122,326.0 6.5% 63;550.7 3.4% 3.1% 0.031381 0.031381 0.0�62763
15 271,471.8 14.4% 137,632.6 .7.3% 7.1% 0.02360�5 O�.023605 0.0�4721 0
20 305,539.9 16.2% 150;889.8 8.0% 8.2% 0.018394 0.018394 0.0�36787
25 280,620.6 14.9% 161,492.4 8.6% 6.3% 0.014886 O�.0 1�4886 0.0�29771
30 241,668.5, 12.8% 136;320.0 7.2% 5.6% 0.012586 0.012586 0.0�25172
35 111,306.3 5.9% 71,941.4 3.8% 2.1% 0.011 O�71 O�.01 1071 0.0�22142
40 511113.1 2.7% 39;493.5 2.1% 0.6% 0.01 O�l O�7 0.01 Ol 07 0.0�20�214
45 56,931.2 3.0% 42,626.4 2.3% 0.8% 0.00�9565 O�.009565 0.0 19130
50 270,218.6 1�4.4% 164;594.1 8.8% 5.6% 0.00�9383 0.009383 0.018766
55 128,171.8 6.8% 99,120.1 5.3% 1.5% 0.009550 O�.009550 0.0 19100
60 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.00000o 0.000000 0.000000
65 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.00000o 0.000000 0.000000
70 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
75 o.n 0 0.0 0 0 0.00000o 0.000000 0.000000
80 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0000001 01-000000 0.010,010100
L85 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.00101010101 01.000000 0.010,010,010,
90 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.00101010101 01-000000 0.010,010,010,
11881,018.3 11 11086,771.4 57.8% 42.2%
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 156 of 208
T2 VMT 3,173634.15
Ration to'T 0.03922786
DSL 3011069.45
GAS 162564.698
DSL 94.9%
GAS 5.1%
Speed VMT VMT @ DS�L VMT DSL Ratio Gas Ratio Average DS,L Average GAS, Combined
Speed Ratio PM10 EF PM10 EF
5 20,675.5 0.7% 19,359.9 0.6% 0.0% 0.148668 01.006678 0.155346
10 85,727.0 2.7% '79,122.7 2.5% 0.2% 0.137626� 01.004224 0.141850,
15 103,798.9 3.3% 95,512.1 3.0% 0.3% 0.1010,942 01.002818 0.10,3760,
20 1741891.8 5.5% 166,06 1-1 5.2% 0.3% 0.076102 0.003195 0.0179298
25 151,064.7 4.8% 141,111.2 4.4% 0.3% 0.063895 01.002720 0.0166615
30 214,012.1 6.7% 2021215.1 6.4% 0.4% 0.057144 0.001154 0.0158298
35 332,956.2 10.5% 317,530.4 10.0% 0.5% 0.052195 01.002152 0.0154347
40 343,027.0 10.8% 324,769.8 10.2% 0.6% 0.0490,018 01.001976 0.0150,983
45 395,958.5 12.5% 378,986.1 11.9% 0.5% 0.047569 01.0 0 1844 0.0149413
50 4121292.1 13.0% 395,603.5 12.5% 0.5% 0.047885 01.001747 0.0149632
55 527,647.1 16.6% 505,428.3 15.9% 0.7% 0.049653 01.001680 0.0151334
60 319,856.4 10.1% 2971476.0 9.4% 0.7% 0.051288 0.001678 0.0152966
65 91,727.1 2.9% 87,893.2 2.8% 0.1% 0.051290, 01.001739 0.01530,29
70 0 0 0 0 01 01 0 0
75 0 0 0 0 01 01 0 01
80 0 Ol Ol 0 Oil Oil 0 0
85 0 0 0 0 01 01 0 01
90 0 0 0 0 01 01 0 0
31173,634.2 100.0% 31011,069.5 94.9%1 5.1%
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 157 of 208
20 13 Daily Truck Traffic
L VEHICLE TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK AADT TOTAL %TRUCK AADT EAL YEAR
POST E AADT AADT %TOT ---------------------------By Axle------ ------------------------------- -----------By Axle----- ------------- 2-WAY VER/
RTE DIST CNTY MILE G DESCRIPTION TOTAL TOTAL VEH 2 3 4 5+ 2 3 4 5+ (1000) EST
005 11 SD R 14.0177 B SAN DIEGO,JCT.RTE.75 SOUTH 160000 6,560 4.10 3693 945 302 1620 56.30 14.40 4.6�O 24.70 819 85E
005 11 SD R 14.0177 A SAN DIEGO,JCT.RTE.75 SOUTH 162000 6480 4.00 3959 778 253 1490 61.10 12.00 3.90 23.00 761 78E
Total/Average 322000 13040 4.0% 7652 1723 555 3110 58.7% 13.2% 4.3% 23.8%
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 158 of 208
r* I
RECI��,'IU111111111"?)N
An Employee-Owned Company
March 23, 2018
Ms. Cheryl Goddard, Senior Planner
City of Chula Vista
Development Services Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910,
Reference: 701 D Street,Park Air Quality Analysis Addendum (RECON Number 8819)
Dear Ms. Goddard:
RECON has reviewed the revised site plan submitted by the City of Chula Vista on the 701 D Street Park
Project. This letter is intended to provide the City with additional information relative to the findings of the
Air Quality Analysis for the D Street Park Project Chula Vista, California (project Air Quality Analysis)�,
prepared August 18, 20,17.
The revised project,plans would locate a community garden in the western end of the proposed park near
Interstate 5. Therefore, the City has requested additional information on the potential cancer risk from
diesel-exhaust particulate matter (DPM) due to the closer proximity of people using the garden to Interstate
5 than previously assessed.Additionally, the City has requested information on the potential for additional
cancer risks from ingestion of DPM due to crops grown within the community garden, see Attachment 1.
Details of calculation methodologies and dispersion modeling inputs are included in the project Air Quality
Analysis. The following analysis is based on the ground-level concentrations modeling in the project Air
Quality Analysis.
Inhalation Risk
Cancer risk associated with inhalation pathways was assessed in the project Air Quality Analysis. The
project would result in an incremental cancer risk of 4.2 in one million. This assumed an average exposure of
0.04 microgram per cubic meter(�tg/m�'% The proposed community garden is located between 20 and 9�O feet
from the western property line. Based on Figure 4 of the project Air Quality Analysis, this would result in
exposures to ground-level concentrations of DPM between 0.06 and 0.05 [tg/M3 and result in 30-year cancer
risks between 5.2 and 6.3 in one million. As the excess,cancer risk would remain below 10 in one million, the
findings of the project Air Quality Analysis would not change.
Ingestion of DPM
A small subset of toxic substances are subject to deposition onto soil, plants, and water bodies. These
substances,need to be evaluated by the appropriate non-inhalat,ion pathways, as well as by the inhalation
pathway. Potential non-inhalation pathways include: soil ingestion; dermal contact; meat, milk and egg
ingestion; fish ingestion; exposed vegetable ingestion; leafy vegetable ingestion; protected vegetable
ingestion; root vegetable ingestion; water ingestion; or breast milk ingestion. Substances subject to
deposition onto soil, plants, and water bodies are referred to as multi-pat,hway substances. Such substances
include semi-volatile organic chemicals and heavy metals.According to the 2015 Air Toxic,s Hot Spots
Program Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Risk Assessments, issued by the Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment, D�PM is not considered a multi-pathway substance. Therefore, cancer risk
associated with DPM is limited to inhalation pathways and no additional cancer risk would be associated
with ingestion of DPM.
1927 Fifth Avenue,San Diego,CA 92101 1 619.30�8.9333 1 reconenvironmental.com
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, SAN DIEGO J CENTRAL COAST I BERKELEY J TU�CSON Page 159 of 208
Ms. Goddard
Page 2
March 23, 2018
In conclusion, locating a community garden near Interstate 5 would not result in significant DPM cancer
risks. No change in findings of the Air Quality Analysis would occur.
Please let me know if you have any questions or require any further information.
Sincerely,
IR
William Maddux
Senior Technical Specialist
WAM:eab
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 160 of 208
ATTACHMENT 1
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 161 of 208
EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET.MODIFY 25,'x35'SDG&E MAINTENANCE PAD AREA AT
EXISTING INLET TO ALLOW FOR NEW EXISTING POWER POLE.PAD AREA TO INCLUDE
PLANTING AREA THAT WILL OCCUR OVER GROUNDCOVER PLANTING WITH TURF STONE GROUNDCOVER PLANTING NEW BIKE RACKS,TRASH&RECYCLE EXISTING CURB
THE INLET'S EXISTING ELEVATION. AND REINFORCED DECOMPOSED GRANITE.PAD WITHIN TUIRFSTONE RECEPTACLES(2 SETS),AND PRECAST TO REMAIN
NEW CATCH BASIN AT FINISH AREA TO SUPPORT HS-20 LOADING. PAVERS THIS AREA PLANTER POTS AT ENTRY PLAZA EXISTING STREET
GRADE OF PLANTING AREA. EXISTING TREES&PLANTING PER 4'LONG PARK CURB CUT TO ALLOW FOR STORM WATER LIGHT AND POWER
MODIFY EXISTING STORM DRAIN ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO REMAIN. BENCHES WITH DRAINAGE INTO ADJACENT INFILTRATION POLES TO REMAIN,
INLET TO ALLOW FOR A CENTER ARMS AT BASIN(BOTH SIDES OF PARKING LOT) TYPICAL
CONNECTION WITH THE CATCH EXISTING 6'WIDE DECOMPOSED NEW 6"CURB PARK MONUMENT
BASIN. SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. GRANITE PAVING PILASTER
AREA
...........................
... .....................
0
0
NEW TTALL
r
SOUNDWALL
>
WITH CMU BASE JUAF�",
AND�PLEXI-GLASS
10,
AT TOP PORTION 4,
61" 1,99, JE >
,gpgrf�f <
m
Im
m
''I...... ........................................................
PROPERTY LINE
NEW TTALL CMU SOUNDWALL.—
WALL THIS AREA TO INCLUDE A EXISTING FENCE TO SHADE STRUCTURE EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN.
4'TALL RETAINING PORTION. REMAIN THIS PORTION (1 6'xl 6)WITH PICNIC PAVING TO BE EXISTING CURB THIS SIDE OF
6'WIDE DECOMPOSED NEW PEDESTRIAN SCALE TABLE,BBQ GRILL& RE-STRIPED FOR STREET WILL BE REMOVED,
GRANITE PATH POLE LIGHT,TYPICAL HOT ASH CONTAINER PARKING LAYOUT WEST OF THE PARKING AREA
BOUNCE HOUSE AREA ADA VAN STALL WITH 30"TALL ACCENT WALL
NEW CURB RAMP
DESIGN STATEMENT NOTES PRELIMINARY PLANTING LEGEND
THE PARK HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO ENHANCE THE THE PARK WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE EXISTING 80 FT.RIGHT OF WAY FOR D STREET.CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED TREE SUCH AS: PROPOSED SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER SUCH AS(CONT'D):
EXISTING URBAN CONDITION BY UTILIZING AN PARK WILL INCLUDE REMOVING PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING STREET'S ASPHALT SURFACING AND ARBUTUS'MARINA' LONICERA JAPONICA'HALLIANIA'(HALL'S JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE)
UNDERUSED EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY FOR SUB-BASE FOR THE PARK AREA WEST OF THE PARKING AREA.THE PARKING AREA WILL RETAIN THE CERCIDIUM'DIESERT MUSEUM' MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS(DEER GRASS)
PARKLAND PURPOSES,THE PARK INTENDS TO EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACING AND PROVIDE NEW STRIPING FOR THE PARKING AREA LAYOUT.A NEW 6'. LAGUNARIA PATTEIRSONIA(NORFOLK ISLAND HIBISCUS) PITTOSPORUM'WHEELERS DWARF'(DWARF MOCK ORANGE)
PROVIDE A PLEASING PLACE OF RESPITE FOR CURB WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE WESTERN END OF THE PARKING AREA.IMPORT SOIL WILL BE PROVIDED RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA'BELLERINA'(INDIA HAWTHORN BALLERINA)
NEARBY RESIDENTS.THE PARK IS DESIGNED TO IN THE PARK AREA WEST OF THE NEW 6"CURB.THE FINISH GRADES OF THE PARK AREA WILL BE 6 INCHES PROPOSED PALM SUCH AS:
ALLOW FOR AN OPEN AND CLEARLY VISIBLE PARK ABOVE THE EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE. TRACHYCARPUS FORTUNEI(WINDMILL PALM)
SPACE THAT TAKES ADVANTAGE OF ITS PROMINENT
VIEWS TO THE WEST,INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN IS A THE PROPOSED PARK DESIGN WILL REDUCE THE IMPERMEABILITY THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS FOR THIS PROPOSED SHRUBS AND GRO�UNDCOVER SUCH AS:
SMALL ENTRY PLAZA,A PLAY ELEMENT FOR PORTION OF D STREET.ALL REMAINING STORMWATER WILL BE TREATED ON SITE THROUGH AGAVE SPP.(AGAVE SPECIES)
CHILDREN BETWEEN THE AGES OF 2 AND 5 YEARS, BIOFILTRATION AND/OR A VEGETATED SWALES.A STORM WATER QUALITY REPORT WILL BE REQUlIRED ARTEMISIA'POWIS CASTLE'(SAGEBRUSH'POWI S CASTLE-)
AND A TURF AREA FOR INFORMAL PLAY.A FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. ANIGOZANTHOS HYBRIDS(RED KANGAROO PAW)
DECOMPOSED PATHWAY ON THE PARK'S SOUTH END ARIMERIA IMARITIMA(SEA PINK)
OFFERS A LOOPED PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY THE PARK PROVIDES 29 STANDARD PUBLIC PARKING STALLS AND 1 PUBLIC ADA PARKING STALL.THE PARK CISTUS`SUNSET'(ROCKROSE'SUNSET-)
THROUGHOUT THE SPACE.THE DESIGN SHALL SHALL ALSO RESERVE 7 STANDARD PARKING STALLS AND THE 1 ADA PARKING,STALL FOR PARK USERS
EMPLOY LOW GROWING DROUGHT TOLERANT DURING NOTED PARK HOURS. GAMBELIA SPECIOSA(ISLAND SNAPDRAGON)
PLANTING AND ACCENT TREES FOR SHADE OR IVA HAYESIANA(SAN DIEGO MARSH ELDER)
SEASONAL INTEREST. FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES ALONG THE PARK'S NORTHERN EDGE, LANTANA SPP.(LANTANA)
SDG&E HAS REQUESTED THAT NO BALOONS OR FLYING OF KITES BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE PARK. LEYMUS CONDENSATUS'CANYON PRINCE'(WILD RYE) N
aw 0f
THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATlION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WATER CONSERVATION
ORDINANCE IN CHAPTER 20.12 OF THE MUNICIPAL COIDE,THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGN MANUAL,AND CHULAVISTA
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LANDSCAPE MANUAL. 1' 16'
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet FEBRUARY 22,2018-CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SE4qWSIW6VN§NT
ON /00 01
00/1
GO ...... :-A Southbay.,,,
10 15 A!lf
Malrk-et�lace�
V f ... ..........
gp
54,
Walmart ..........
0p %,�..........
CHULA
10
ell,
VISITA
MN �4
00)"
1900
al -V% Ao
NATIONAL
"k,
Aft
\A
............
Y
CIT
Q/ 0010 ..........
.......... 7v
0)IM .........
�4 .......
71
p
0
f fix "PI
# 5 1
r wj
w/
ol
5
0001
60 1k,
OPP
SO
OIL.
fiv
ffflpfif J),
(j
01
f"i
0
7
0,
j
77,
MY!!!
wrll� k Ir
77
z
JI
j�jq
llj�� jfl
fol fj
...........1,
_771111
771111
;3
Fir
0
T,
Z1.
der, T)Ij
111�1�1 Fea,ter
119
E lip, rn le ary
7
k
�53 70 7Y,
Yz-
-15
3/%
�4 7,Y/—
%
f
�,J is
"a"-V' i tor
I n
or0latiart,Center
E3,q�f nt E
?0\ r(dh
Trol,ley 7
`7--p0\N "St""t i on
311
"k,
WL
rum""' IS It�re e It wHmq'k a�r�k PwIrking Study Area 01 130,260 520 780 1,04,0
ft
C1W OF
CHULA VISTA Date Printed:
October 7, 2019
Disclaime2WOAel 1AAgdadaugaiAeVed to be accurate,but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search appraisBOgairMl cofl:Mning verification.
!11111111�III!
Maximum 0=1 1 10,1111111 11 � �
#of legal 6:45 A.M. 9:06 A.M. 6:010 A.M. 11:40 A.M. 12:10 P.M. 2:10i P.M. 5:03 P.M. 6:00 P.M. 8:45 P.M. 10:15 P.M.
parking 7:15 A.M. 9':15 A.M. 6:30 A.M. 11:56 A.M. 12:40 P.M. 2:301 P.M. 5:301 P.M. 6:25 P.M. 9:20 P.M. 10:30 P.M.
MON FRI SU��N THU TUES �MON TUE WED THU TUE
spaces 04/02/18 4/6/2018 09/29/19 04/12/18 �10/01/19 Odd6i 04/17/181 04/11/18 �10/03/19 04/10/18
Chula Vista Street
D Street-April 2018
�D Street,-Sept.-Oict.2019
Flower Street
Sea Vale Street
Jefferson Avenue
Madison Avenue
Oaklawn Avenue
Woodlawn Avenue
MEN=
NINE= NEWIM
April 2018 -TOTAL 518 522 456 485 518 532
Percent Full 7=88/(o 8=4�%/o 86%
84% 84% 74%
MENNNEMM
Sept.-Oct.2019 -TOTAL 628 570 4,01 531
Percent Full 100% 91% 64% 85%
TOTAL 518 522 570 45i6 401 5�29 4,85i 518 531 532
Percent Full 88% 88% 96% 77% 68% 8�9% 82% 88% 90% 90%
,t4�M
0— Poo
C1W Of Not�ice of Exemptioll
CHUIA VISTA
Is
Tw El Office of P�lanning and Research From: Cheryl Go�ddard
1400 Tenth Street, Room 1.2 1. City of Chula Vista
Sacramento,, CA 958�14 276 Fourth.Ave
Chula Vista', CA 919 10
Z County Clerk,
County,of San Diego
'1600 Pacific Highway, Room.260
San Diego, CA 92 101
Pr *'ect Title: The De,s,ig ation and Set-aside for Parkland PuKposes of a 0.8 1-acre Site Located Within the D
oj
Street Right-,Of-Wa
Project Applicant: Citv of Chula Vista, (6�19)476-23,29
Project Loc atio n-Spec lific.- D Street right-of-way, west of Woodlawn Avenue.
Project Location-City.- Citv of Chula Vista Project Locatlion-County.- San DLq9_o
Description of Project.- The designation and set-aside for p�arkland purpo�ses of an approximately O�.81-acre site
locatedwithin the D Street right-of-way, west of Woodlawn Avenue, and approval of the Park Master Plan and-the
name for the public park(the"Project")to be located within, said site.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Cilltv of Chula Vista
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project.- City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Ave
Chula Vista, CA 919 1,0
Exempt Status.,
El Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
El Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
El Emergency Project(Sec. 21080(b)(4), 1526�9(b)(c)),
Z Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: Minor Alterations to Land Section
15304, Class,4,; In-Fill Develmment Proiects, Section 15332, Class 32
0 Statutory, Exemptions. State code numben
0 General Rule Exemption: Section 1506L(b�U3
E] Other: Section 15378 (b:)(5)
Reasons to sup�port exemption findings. The proposed Project would, not result in a significant effect on, the
environment,, create a cumulative impact, damage a scenic highway, be located on a site pursuant to Section
6�59�62.5, or cause a substantial adverse change in 'the significance of a historical resource. The preparation of a
Health Risk Assessment (HRA) is also as part of the CEQA review of the Project.
"f 0 4
Lead,Agency Co 'act Person: Cheivll`,�, Qoddard Area Code/Telephone/Extension. (619)476-2329
Slignature. Date: October 22,2019 TI*tle,- Senior Planner
E 6)gnWby Lead Agency
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 165 of 208
CITYOF C H U L A V 1 5 T A
CHUIAVISTA
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
October 10, 2019 6:3 0 p.m.
A Special Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Chula Vista was called
to order at 6:32 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located at 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista,
California.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Commissioners Enriquez, Fernandez, Garcia, German, Gregorio,
Zarem, and Chair Doyle.
ABSENT: Commissioner Garcia-Lopez and Chair Doyle
ALSO PRESENT: Director of Community Services Lamb, Principal Recreation
Manager Shaun Ellis, Principal Landscape Architect Patricia
Ferman., Associate Planner Dai Hoang
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were none.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF MAY 16, 2019, REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Commission approve the minutes
2. APPROVAL OF COMMISSIONER ZAREM ABSENCE FROM JUNE 20�9 20199
SPECIAL MEETING
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Commission excuse the absence
ACTION: Commissioner German moved to approve staff s recommendations and offered
Consent Calendar Items I and 2. Commissioner Gregorio seconded the motion,
and it carried by the following vote,*
Yes: 7 —Enriquez, Fernandez, Garcia, German, Gregorio, Zarem, and
Chair Doyle
No: 0
Abstain: 0
Page 1. 1 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes October 10,2019
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 166 of 208
C111YOF C H"U �L A V I S T A
CHUIAVISTA
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
There were none.
ACTION ITEMS
3. SELECTION OF COMMISSION CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2019-20,20,
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Commission selects a Chair and Vice-Chair for Fiscal
Year 2019-2020
Commissioners discussed the nominations.
ACTION: Commissioner Enriquez moved to nominate Commissioner Doyle as Chair
and Commissioner Zarem as Vice-Chair. Commissioner Zarem seconded
the motion, and it carried by the following vote:
Yes: 7 — Enriquez, Fernandez, Garcia, German, Gregorio, Zarem, and
Chair Doyle
No: 0
Abstain: 0
41. DEVELOP AND DISCUSS PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION GOALS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Discuss and develop Parks and Recreation Commission
goals for Fiscal Year 2019-2020
ACTION: Parks Administrator, Tim Farmer suggested a few options for
Commissioners to consider; Option #1: Each Commissioner suggest 2-3
goals and present them with the next agenda packet, Option #2: Parks &
Rec. Department provide the Commission with priorities that department
feels the Commission can,help support. Commissioners requested that Tim
Farmer provide a list of recommended goals be sent out to the
Commissioners, by the next commission meeting and Commissioners send
their proposals via email by the next commission meeting.
Commissioners decided to postpone and discuss Goals and O�b ectives at
the next commission meeting.
Yes: 0
No: 0
Abstain: 0
Page 2 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes October 10,2019
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 167 of 208
ezreatim
CITYOF C H L) L A V 1 5 T A
CHUIAVISTA
5. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE DESIGNATION AND SET-ASIDE
FOR PARKLAND PURPOSES OF A 0.81-ACRE SITE, LOCATED WITHIN THE
D STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, WEST OF WOODLAWN AVENUE, AND
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE, PARK MASTER PLAN AND THE
PARK'S NAME.
Principal Landscap�e Architect Patricia Ferman presented the park master plan and the p�ark's
name.
ACTION: Commissioner German,moved to recommend to approve the park master plan and
the p�ark's name. Commissioner Garcia seconded the motion, and it carried by the following
vote:
Yes: 7 — Enriquez, Fernandez, Garcia, German, Gregorio, Zarem, and
Chair Doyle
No: 0
Abstain: 0
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
Items offered below arefor the eommissioner It s information only and do not require a motion
or approval.
6. UPDATE— DEVELOPMENT OF DISC GOLF COURSE AT GREG ROGERS
PARK(Tim Farmer)
Mike Reeves provided an update on the Development of Disc Golf Course at Greg
Rogers Park. Updates will.be provided to the Commission through its development.
70 UPDATE— FIELD ALLOCATION PROCEDURES (Tim Farmer—verbal report)
Parks Administrator, Tim Farmer provided on update regarding YSC and field
allocations. Farmer explained that Parks & Rec department moved forward with taking
the field allocation back. Effective, with the upcoming spring allocation in 2020.
Commissioner Garcia requested the Commission be updated with field allocations at the
next commission,meeting.
OTHER BUSINESS
8. STAFF COMMENTS
Principal Recreation Manager Shaun Ellis provided information on the successful movie
nights in the park. Ellis provided information for camps during fall break, various
activities going on for Halloween at several Rec Centers, shared information on the city's
Page 3 1 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes October 10,2019
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 168 of 208
CITYOF C H IL) L A V I S T A
CHUIAVISTA
Glow Run. Phase one at Norman Park Senior Center has been completed, phase two will
start soon; installing a new kitchen and remodeling bathrooms.
9. CHAIR'S COMMENTS
Chair Doyle expressed his hap�p�iness to be appointed for another year and is looking
forward to finding out bow field allocations will go.
10. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS
Commissioner Zarem, shared that the county is putting a community garden in Bonita. At
Otay Lakes County Park, there will be a boy scouts camp. Otay Regional Park is putting in a
lot of plants, they are being restored and fixed. Zarem invited the Commissioners and City
Staff to Birds at Sunset, at the Estuary. Commissioner Enriquez shared that she used the
Baysbore Bikeway; 14 miles. Enriquez said it is a beautiful bike route.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:33 p.m., Chair Doyle adjourned the meeting to the next Regular Meeting on
November 21ft 2019 6-3 M., at Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista,
California.
DRAFT
Geovanna Gonzalez,, Secretary
Page 4 1 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes October 10,2019
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 169 of 208
'Are"
710,
'e If,
g"
�,q�"NIS/
rwp—
f
tla
7u
29"
DRAF"T PARK MAS'TER PLAN
D STREET WOODLAWN "E
OCTOBER 10, 2019
CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DIVISION
aw Of
CHULAVISTA
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 170 of 208
g f I -,W, '""Now
,
Ad
t-ii L;
Ali,Law
:4 rej
IMF"
711 v
N
",V
'7e:
'7e:
'7e:
'7e:
'7e:
'7e:
'7A
'7A
"'V
W4
7�7�,'
--7-77"
0,
-7
'74
1
Isl
fI
0100y
Idl'
7 gff
G\
I q,11
gg(
0 POO
lu!
+ rn
0
�4
Tin
CI
PROJE&I'll"."
SA
(D
LOCATION
0
CHU LA
VISTA
e prp-
F'�ter fol
ea
OW
E I(-,im eq't'i ry
7
060/01
POP '7,
g mma egg/00
�0..........
A/MI'M OIL//
A
d
All's
g
"IRA
0
�g
�g
�g
�g
�g
omig
0 "o
awcw
msitor
VICINITY
CHULAVISTA
ma
OCTOBER 10,2019-CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet Page 171 of 208
EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET.MODIFY 25'x35'SDG&E MAINTENANCE PAD PRECAST PLANTER POTS WITH EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING(AND BIKE RACKS
EXISTING INLET TO ALLOW FOR NEW AREA AT EXISTING POWER POLES. ACCENT PLANTING SUB-BASE)TO REMAIN AT 12'
EXISTING STREET
PLANTING AREA THAT WILL OCCUR AT PAD AREAS TO SUPPORT HS-20 WIDE ACCESS PATH.PROVIDE
NEW PAINTED SEAL COAT AT LIGHTS AND POWER
THE INLET'S EXISTING ELEVATION. LOADING. 4'LONG PARK BENCHES POLES TO REMAIN,
EXISTING ASPHALT.
EXISTING TREES,PLANTING& WITH CENTER ARMS,TYP. TYPICAL
NEW CATCH BASIN AT FINISH GRADE
LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PER ADJACENT OPTION FOR COMMUNITY
OF PLANTING AREA.MODIFY TACTILE WARNING
DEVELOPMENT TO REMAIN. NEW GAME TABLES,TRASH&
EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET TO ART AT THE MAINTENANCE
)111 STRIPS,TYP OF 2
RECYCLE RECEPTACLES,AND PET LOCATIONS.
ACCESS PATH
ALLOW FOR A CONNECTION WITH EXISTING 6'WIDE SIDEWALK,CURB,
WASTE STATION AREA.
A
THE CATCH BASIN. &GUTTER TO REMAIN.
g",
14
0
6'TALL METAL—T—
PICKET FENCE AT
WESTERN PARK
!>
z
N >
�%s on <
m...........
z
m
PROPERTY LINE
A
NEW CONCRETE
COMMUNITY GARDEN:(12) 6'WIDE DECOMPOSED EXISTING FENCE TO SHADE STRUCTURE(16'xl6') --- REMOVABLE
4'x6'RAISED GARDEN PLOTS, GRANITE PATH REMAIN THIS PORTION WITH PICNIC TABLES,BBQ BOLLARDS,TYP. GUTTER AT EXISTING
(3)COMPOST BINS,STORAGE NEW PEDESTRIAN SCALE GRILLS&HOT ASH CONTAINERS ASPHALT
BIN,AND A 42"TALL FENCE POLE LIGHT,TYPICAL PARK MONUMENT EXISTING CURB,GUTTER,
AND GATE AT THE GARDEN'S TOT LOT PLAY AREA WITH SWINGS- PILASTER AND CURB RAMP TO
PERIMETER. THE SIZE, BOUNCE HOUSE AREA &PLAY STRUCTURES FOR KIDS REMAIN THIS AREA
LAYOUT AND NUMBER OF AGED 2-5yr&5yr AND UP
GARDEN PLOTS COULD BE
REVISED DURING DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT.
DESIGN STATEMENT NOTES PRELIMINARY PLANTING LEGEND
THE PARK HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO ENHANCE THE THE PARK WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE EXISTING 80 FT.RIGHT OF WAY FOR D STREET.CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED TREE SUCH AS: PROPOSED SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER SUCH AS(CONT'D):
EXISTING URBAN CONDITION BY UTILIZING AN PARK WILL INCLUDE REMOVING PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING STREET'S ASPHALT SURFACING AND LAGUNARIA PATTERSONIA(NORFOLK ISLAND HIBISCUS) LONICERA JAPONICA'HALLIANA'(HALL'S JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE)
UNDERUSED EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY FOR SUB-BASE WHEREVER PLANTING OCCURS.THE ASPHALT PAVING AND SUB-BASE ALONG THE CURB LINE AT PLATANUS RACEMOSA(SYCAMORE) MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS(DEER GRASS)
PARKLAND PURPOSES.THE PARK INTENDS TO THE NORTH SIDE OF D STREET SHALL REMAIN TO PROVIDE FOR A 12'WIDE ACCESS PATH.THIS ACCESS QUERCUS ILEX(HOLLY OAK) PITTOSPORUM'WHEELERS DWARF'(DWARF MOCK ORANGE)
PROVIDE A PLEASING PLACE OF HEALTH,WELLNESS, PATH IS PROVIDED FOR THE PURPOSES OF RETAINING SDG&E MAINTENANCE ACCESS TO THE EXISTING ULMUS PARVIFOLIA(CHINESE ELM) RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA'BELLERINA'(INDIA HAWTHORN BALLERINA)
AND RESPITE FOR NEARBY RESIDENTS.THE PARK IS OVERHEAD POWER LINES.ADDITIONALLY,THE 2 WESTERNMOST POWER POLES SHALL INCLUDE A 25'x35'
DESIGNED TO ALLOW FOR AN OPEN AND VISIBLE CLEAR SET UP ZONE. PROPOSED PALM SUCH AS:
PARK SPACE THAT TAKES ADVANTAGE OF ITS VIEWS TRACHYCARPUS FORTUNEI(WINDMILL PALM)
TO THE WEST.INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN IS A PICNIC THE PROPOSED PARK DESIGN WILL REDUCE THE IMPERMEABILITY THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS FOR THIS
AREA PLAZA,A TOT LOT WITH PLAY ELEMENTS FOR PORTION OF D STREET.ALL REMAINING STORMWATER WILL BE TREATED ON SITE THROUGH PROPOSED SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER SUCH AS:
CHILDREN BETWEEN THE AGES OF 2-5 YEARS AND 5+ BIOFILTRATION AND/OR A VEGETATED SWALES.A STORM WATER QUALITY REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED AGAVE SPP.(AGAVE SPECIES)
YEARS,A COMMUNITY GARDEN,AND TURF AREAS FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. ARTEMISIA'POWIS CASTLE'(SAGEBRUSH'POWIS CASTLE') ��mfl
FOR INFORMAL PLAY.A DECOMPOSED PATHWAY ON
THE PARK'S SOUTH END OFFERS A LOOPED FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES ALONG THE PARK's NORTHERN EDGE, ANIGOZANTHOS HYBRIDS(RED KANGAROO PAW)
PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY THROUGHOUT THE SPACE. NO BALOONS OR FLYING OF KITES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE PARK. ARMERIA MARITIMA(SEA PINK)
THE DESIGN SHALL EMPLOY LOW GROWING CISTUS'SUNSET'(ROCKROSE'SUNSET-)
DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTING AND ACCENT TREES THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WATER CONSERVATION GAMBELIA SPECIOSA(ISLAND SNAPDRAGON) N
FOR SHADE OR SEASONAL INTEREST. ORDINANCE IN CHAPTER 20.12 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE,THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGN MANUAL,AND IVA HAYESIANA(SAN DIEGO MARSH ELDER) awOF
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LANDSCAPE MANUAL. LANTANA SPP.(LANTANA) 6- F
LEYMUS CON DEN SATUS'CANYON PRINCE'(WILD RYE) SCALE:1" 16' CHULAVISTA
OCTOBER 10,2019-CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
6'WIDE
D.G. 12'WIDE MAINTENANCE
PLANTING AREA: PATH TOT LOT PLAY AREA: PLANTING AREA- ACCESS PATH:
LOW GROWING PLAY STRUCTURE FOR KIDS 2yr-5yr;PLAY STRUCTURE GROUNDCOVER. EXISTING ASPHALT&
GROUNDCOVER/SHRUBS AND FOR KIDS 5+yr;SWINGS PLANTING SUB-BASE TO REMAIN
UPRIGHT EVERGREEN TREES
PEDESTRIAN SCALE SHADE STRUCTURE WITH
POLE LIGHTS PICNIC TABLES,BBQ
GRILLS,&HOT ASH
TRE
UPRIGHT EVERGREEN
CONTAINER
E
Ar,
'A
SENN 0,mll
18
gy
Ogg
. ..............
SECTION'A-A-ELEVATION:VIEW LOOKING WEST FROM TOT LOT PLAY AREA
NOT TO SCALE
aw OF
CHULAVISTA
i� AMR
OCTOBER 10,2019-CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
............. ......
SHADE STRUCTURE WITH PICNIC TABLES INFORMAL PLAY LAWN
PLAYWEB(#ZZXX0019)BY PLAYWORLD
AGE RANGE:5+YEARS SWING-ARCH-500 BY PLAYWORLD
xll�71
rg"
91111
CHALLENGERS(#350-1741)BY PLAYWORLD
PLAY STRUCTURE AGE RANGE:2 YEARS-5 YEARS FURNISHINGS ClW OF
CHULAVISTA
OCTOBER 10,2019-CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
IN III til
C1TY' C,0UNC'1L
A,GEN' DA STIA, ""EMENT
CITY, OF
.....................................
CHUIAVISTA
January 14,2 0 2 0 File,ID: 19-0579
'TITLE
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MODIFYING THE APPENDIX TO THE
LOCAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE TO AMEND THE MANAGEMENT ANALYST POSITION TO INCLUDE
ALL LEVELS, DELETE THE, POSITION OF' FINANCE AND PURCHASING MANAGER, AND ADD THE
POSITIONS OF FINANCE MANAGER AND SMART TECHNOLOGY OFFICER TO THE LIST OF OFFICIALS WHO
ARE REQUIRED TO FILE PERIODIC STATEMENTS OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.,
SUMMARY
The Political Reform Act requires every local agency to amend its Conflict of Interest Code when change is
necessitated by changed circumstances.The proposed reso�lution adopts an amended appendix to the City's
Conflict ofInterest Code to amend the Management Analyst position to include all levels',delete the position
of Finance and Purchasing Manager, and add the positions of Finance Manager and Smart Technology
Officer to the list of officials that are required to file periodic statements of economic interest, and
establishes the disclosure categories under which the employees would be,required to file.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)i and has determined that the activity is not a "Project 11 as defined under
Section 15378(b)(S,) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it invo,lves only amendments to the local conflict
of interest code to amend the Management Analyst position to include all levels, delete the position of
Finance and Purchasing Manager, and to add the positions of Finance Manager and Smart Technology
Officer to the list of required filers of periodic statements of economic interests; and therefore is an
organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or indirect physical
change in the environmental-, therefore,, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the
activity is not subject to CEQA.Thus,no environmental review is required.
DISCUSSION
On March 21, 20,001, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2807, adopting by reference the standardized
conflict of interest code contained in Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations,, section 18,730, and any
amendments thereto that are adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission. The ordinance requires
1111. 0 0 1 PIi3ge 1 1
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 175 of 208
that the Council set forth by resolution City officials and designated employees who are required to file
statements of'economic interests and the, disclosure categories under which each official and designated
employee shall file.
The following positions were recently added to or deleted from the City's Classification Plan and, after
reviewing the duties of the positions with input from the appropriate department, staff'recomm ends the
fo�llowing revisions to the list of designated filers:
• Revise the existing "Management Analyst" to "Management Analyst (all levels)" to account for the
recent changes to the Management Analyst position series
• Delete Finance and Purchasing Manager
• Add Finance Manager
• Add Smart'Technolo�gy Officer
This resolution also designates the filers as "local agency officials" for the purpose of AB1234, thereby
requiring them to participate in the mandatory ethics training.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT"
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific
and co�nsequently,the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11),
is not applicable to this decision for purposes of'determining a disqualifying real property-related financial
conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal. Gov't Code§ 87100, et seq.).
Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Councilmember, of any other fact
that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
CURREN"I",-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the proposed resolution will have no impact on the general fund.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPAC0111
There is no ongoing fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Exhibit A- List of Designated Filers
Staff Contact:Leah�Larrarte
P �3ge 2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 176 of 208
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA MODIFYING THE APPENDIX TO THE
LOCAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE TO AMEND THE
MANAGEMENT ANALYST POSITION TO INCLUDE ALL
LEVELS, DELETE THE POSITION OF FINANCE AND
PURCHASING MANAGER, AND ADD THE POSITIONS, OF
FINANCE MANAGER AND SMART TEC14NOLOGY
OFFICER TO THE LIST OF OFFICIALS WHO ARE
REQUIRED TO FILE PERIODIC STATEMENTS OF
ECONOMIC INTERESTS
WHEREASI the Political Reform Act (California Government Code sections 87100
through 91014), requires certain officials and candidates to file Statements of Economic Interests
(Form 700) and requires local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest
codes- and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 280�7, adopting by reference the
standardized conflict of interest code contained in Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations,
section 1.8730, and any amendments thereto that are adopted by the Fair Political Practices
Commission; and
WHEREASI the ordinance requires that the City Council set forth by resolution the
officials and designated employees, who are required to file statements of economic interests and
the disclosure categories under which each such official and designated employee shall file; and
WHEREAS, the Political Reform Act requires every local agency to review its Conflict
of Interest Code periodically to determine if amendments are necessary; and
WHEREAS, the City Attorney and the City Clerk have reviewed the Code and its
Appendix, consulted with Department Directors, and determined that amendments to the
Appendix of the Code are necessary; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires that all City employees who are required to file
Form 700 under the City's Conflict of Interest Code be designated as "Local Agency Officials,"
as defined in Government Code §53234(c)(2), thereby requiring them to participate in the ethics
training mandated by AB 1234; and
WHEREAS, the list of o�fficials, candidates and designated employees of the City of
Chula Vista who are required to file periodic statements of economic interests, and the disclosure
categories under which each such official, candidate or designated employee is required to file,
was presented to the City Council and is attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part of this
Resolution.
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 177 of 208
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it hereby modifies the appendix to the local Conflict of Interest Code to amend the list
of officials, candidates and designated employees who are required to file periodic statements of
economic interests, and the disclosure categories for said filers, in the form presented and as
reflected in Exhibit A to this Resolution, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the
City Clerk.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC Glen R. Googins
City Clerk City Attorney
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 178 of 208
EXHIBIT A
OFFICIALS REQUIRED TO FILE PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE §§ 87200, et seq.
The following officials shall file periodic statements disclosing certain economic interests
(commonly referred to as "700 Forms")with the Fair Political Practices Commission, as required
by California Government Code §§87200— 87210:
Mayor and City Councilmembers
Candidates for Elective Office
City Manager
City Attorney
Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Planning Commission Members
In addition, each official falling within any of the above-listed categories, except"Candidates for
Elective Office," is required to comply with the ethics, training requirements of California
Government Code §§53234, et seq.
DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES REQUIRED TO FILE UNDER THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
Each City employee whose position title is listed below shall file a 700 Form under the designated
disclosure category (as set forth in Chula Vista Municipal Code §2.02.030) and is required to
comply with the ethics training requirements of California Government Code §§53234, et seq.
Where "Full, Disclosure" is, indicated, it implies that the disclosure categories are 1, 2, 5, and 7.
Position Categor
Administrative Services Manager... ..........................L 2� 5
Animal Care Facility Administrator. ..................................................L 3� 6� 7
Assistant Chief of Police....................................................................................................L 2� 6� 7
Assistant City Attorney...........................................................................................Full Disclosure
AssistantCity Clerk...............................................................................................................1, 2, 6
Assistant City Manager...........................................................................................Full Disclosure
Assistant Director of Development Services.....................................................................1, 2, 6� 7
Assistant Director of Engineering..........................................................................................1, 2, 5
Conflict of Interest Code—Designated Positions
Adopted by City Council on[DATE],Resolution No.2020-XXX
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 179 of 208
Posi*tion Title Disclosure Categor
As .�stanKDirector of Finance..................................................................................Full Disclosure
Assistant Director of Human Resources................................................................................I, 3, 5
Assistant Director of Public Works .......................................................................................I, 2, 5
Assistant Director of Recreation........................................................................................I" 2" 6" 7
AssistantPlanner........................................................................................................................3" 4
Associate Engineer ------------_—_—_—_—_-----------------..3, 4
Associate Land Surveyor-----------_—_—_—_—_---------------..3, 4
Associate Plan Check Engineer—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_------------.I" 2
AssociatePlanner.......................................................................................................................3, 4
Benefits Manager-----------_—_—_—_—_---------------------5
Budget & Analysis Manager_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_------..Fu0Disc8osure
Building _Inspection Manager........................................................................................................._
Building Inspector
(all __________________________________..3
Building
_—_—_—_—_---------------..], 2
Building Project Manager__________________________________3, 4, 5
Building Services Supervisor______________________—_—_—_—_—_---6
Chiefof Police ...................................................................................................................l, 2, 6, 7
Chief of Staff..........................................................................................................Full Disclosure
Chief Sustainability Officer...............................................................................................L2, 6, 7
City Attorney Investigator-----------------------_—_—__FmNDisclosmre
CityClerk...............................................................................................................................l, 2, 6
City Clerk Analyst-----------_—_—_—_—_--------------------.6
CityLibrarian.................................................................................................................................6
Code Enforcement Officer(all ______________________________.3
Collections Supervisor...................................................................................................................3
Constituent Services Manager—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_------..Fu0Dimclosure
Construction & Repair
Supervisor—_—_—_—_—_----------------------.6
Council Assistant....................................................................................................Full Disclosure
Cultural. Arts ----------------------_—_—_—_—_-2, 7
Deputy City Attorney (all —_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_-----.FulDisclomure
Conflict m[Interest Cmde-DesigoatodPwmitimos
Adopted by City Council om[mATE],Resolution No.2020-XXX
Posiffion Title Di*sdosure Categor
Deputy City Manager..............................................................................................Full Disclosure
?111 do-
Deputy Fire Chief..................................................................................................................11 ZI 0
Development Services Counter Manager..................................................................................314
Development Services Department Director.....................................................................1, 2, 6, 7
Director of Community Services ............................................................................Full Disclosure
Director of Economic Development..................................................................................1, 2, 6, 7
Director of Engineering/City Engineer..............................................................................112, 6, 7
Director of Human Resources................................................................................................L 3� 5
Director of Information Technology..............................................................................................6
Director of Public Works.......................................................................................................11215
Emergency Services Coordinator ..................................................................................................6
Environmental Services Manager..........................................................................................3, 6, 7
Environmental Sustainability Manager..................................................................................3, 6, 7
Facilities Financing Manager.............................................................................................112, 6, 7
FacilitiesManager..........................................................................................................................5
Facility& Supply Specialist ........................................................................................................ 6
F'4*&nc-e,-taii,d4lff ............4-u-W44- ts, 4, f-suiv,
Ffi.'ianceM n e.i.................................
...............
FireBattalion Chief.......................................................................................................................6
Fire Captain (80 HR Training Division only)................................................................................6
FireChief...............................................................................................................................L 2� 6
FireDivision Chief................................................................................................................L 2� 6
Fire Inspector/Fire Investigator(all levels)............................................................................3, 4, 6
Fire Prevention Engineer/Fire Investigator............................................................................3, 4, 6
FirePrevention Aide......................................................................................................................3
Fiscaland Management Analyst....................................................................................................5
FiscalDebt Management Analyst..................................................................................................5
Fleet Inventory Control Specialist.................................................................................................5
FleetManager................................................................................................................................5
HousingManager...............................................................................................................L 2� 6� 7
Conflict of Interest Code—Designated Positions
Adopted by City Council on[DATE],Resolution No.2020-XXX
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 18,1 of 208
Position Title ......Disclosure Categor
Human Resources _—_—_—_—_--------------------.5
Information Technology Manager—_—_—_—_—_----------------------.6
LandscapeArchitect...................................................................................................................3, 4
LandscapePlanner.....................................................................................................................3" 4
Law Office Manager------------_—_—_—_—_------------------.6
Librarian III _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_--------------.6
DigitalLibrary Services Manager_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_-----------..6
NManagement----- -== )...................................................................................................-
Marketing and ___________—_—_—_—_—_-----..3, 5
Open Space Manager_____________________________________..3, 5
Park _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_------------.3
Park Ranger Program Manager ______________________—_—_—_—_—_—..3
Park Ranger Supervisor-----------___________—_—_—_—_—_-----..3
Parks and Recreation Administrator_—_—_—_—_----------------------.6
Parks Manager -----------_—_—_—_—_-------------------..], 2, 5
Performance and Organizational Development Manager..............................................................5
Plan Check Supervisor-----------------------_—_—_—_—__—_—_l, 2
Planning Manager---------------------------------------'L2
Police Administrative ServicesAdministrator........................................................Full Disclosure
Police Captain----------------------_—_—_—_—_—_—_FmNDisclosmre
Police Technology Manager----------------------_—_—_—_—_--_3, 6
PolicyAide..............................................................................................................Full Disclosure
Principal Civil Engineer-----------_—_—_—_—_---------------3, 4, 5
Principal Economic Development Specialist-----------_—_—_—_—_—__—_-1, 2
Principal Landscape Architect...................................................................................................l, 2
PrincipalLibrarian........................................................................................................................ 6
Principal _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_-----------..3" 5
Principal
Planner........................................................................................................................1, 2
Principal Project Coordinator ................................................................................................1, 2, 7
Principal Recreation —_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_--------------.6
Conflict m[Interest Cmde-DesigoatodPwmitimos
Adopted by City Council om[mATE],Resolution No.2020-XXX
Position Title Disclosure Categor
Principal Traffic Engineer......................................................................................................3, 4, 5
Procurement Services Analyst................................................................................Full Disclosure
ProcurementSpecialist...................................................................................................................5
Project Coordinator (all levels)................................................................................................642� 7
Public Works Inspector (all levels)........................................................................................3, 4, 5
PublicWorks Manager..........................................................................................................1, 2, 5
Public Works Superintendent ................................................................................................1, 2, 5
Purchasing Agent....................................................................................................Full Disclosure
RealProperty Manager..........................................................................................................1, 2, 6
RevenueManager..........................................................................................................................6
Risk Management Specialist......................................................................................................1, 2
RiskManager.............................................................................................................................1, 2
Senior Assistant City Attorney...............................................................................Full Disclosure
SeniorBuilding Inspector..............................................................................................................3
SeniorCivil Engineer.............................................................................................................3, 4, 5
Senior Code Enforcement Officer .............................................................................................3� 4
Senior Council Assistant.........................................................................................Full Disclosure
Senior Economic Development Specialist.............................................................................1� 2� 7
Senior Fire Inspector/Investigator..........................................................................................3, 4, 6
SeniorGraphic Designer................................................................................................................5
SeniorLand Surveyor................................................................................................................4� 5
SeniorLandscape Inspector...................................................................................................3, 4, 5
SeniorLibrarian.............................................................................................................................6
Senior Management Analyst......................................................................................................5, 7
Senior Open Space Inspector.....................................................................................................3, 5
SeniorPark Ranger........................................................................................................................3
Senior Plan Check Engineer ......................................................................................................3, 4
SeniorPlanner............................................................................................................................112
Senior Procurement Specialist................................................................................Full Disclosure
SeniorProject Coordinator ....................................................................................................1, 2� 7
Conflict of Interest Code—Designated Positions
Adopted by City Council on[DATE],Resolution No.2020-XXX
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 18,3 of 208
Posiffion Title Di*sdosure Categor
Senior Public Works Inspector..............................................................................................3, 4, 5
Senior Risk Management Specialist..........................................................................................1, 2
Y (-)�f�!rl
S m a rt Te cli ti o I o g, 'icet, ...........31.% 6
SpecialEvents Coordinator............................................................................................................3
Stormwater Environmental Specialist (all levels)..........................................................................3
Stormwater Program Manager...............................................................................................3, 4, 5
Supervising Public Safety Analyst.............................................................................................3, 6
TransportationEngineer.....................................................................................................64643� 4� 5
Veterinarian (Permitted, all levels, except hourly)........................................................................6
Wastewater/Stormwater Operations Manager.......................................................................1, 2, 6
Board and Commission Members:
Board of Appeals and Advisors Members.....................................................................2� 5
Boardof Ethics Members ..............................................................................................I� 2
Civil Service Commission Members .................................................................................3
Charter Review Commission Members......................................................Full Disclosure
Districting Commission Members..............................................................Full Disclosure
Growth Management Oversight Commission Members ...............................................2, 4
Historic Preservation Commission ................................................................................112
Mobilehome Rent Review Commission Members........................................................I� 2
Consultants/Newly Created Positions* Full Disclosure
Hearing Officers......................................................................................................Full Disclosure
*Consultants and individuals in newly created positions shall be included in the list of designated
employees and shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure category in the code, subject to
the following limitation.- The City may determine, in writing, that a particular consultant or
individual in a newly created position, although a "designated position,"' is hired to perform a
range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure
requirements in this section. Such written determination shall include a description of the
consultant's or new position's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent
of disclosure requirements. The determination for consultants shall be included in the contract by
which the consultant is hired by the City. The determination for newly created positions shall be
documented on an FPPC Form 804. The City's determinations are public record.
Conflict of Interest Code—Designated Positions
Adopted by City Council on[DATE],Resolution No.2020-XXX
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 18,4 of 208
IN III til
C1TY' C,0UNC'1L
A,GEN' DA STIA, ""EMENT
CITY, OF
.....................................
CHUIAVISTA
January 14,2 0 2 0 File,ID: 20-0004
TITLE
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
5.19.050.1) TO ELIMINATE ONE-YEAR WAITING PERIOD APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN NEW CANNABIS
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICANTS (FIRST READING)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council place the ordinance on first reading.
SUMMARY
This proposed ordinance amends Chula Vista Municipal Code section 5.19.0150.1) to remove the provision
restricting certain cannab�is business applicants from submitting a new license application within one year
of application rejection or conditional license exp�iration.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed ordinance amending Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 5.19.050.1), General Rules, has been
reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and it has been determined
that the activity is not a"Project)I as defined under Section 15378 of the state CEQA Guidelines because it will
not result in a physical change in the environmento therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State
CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it has also been
determined that the activity qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California
Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines.Thus,no environmental review is required.
BO,ARD/COMMI,SSIO,N/CO�MMII"TEE,RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
In March of 2018, City Council approved Ordinance 3418, which added Chapter 5.19 to the Chula Vista
Municipal Code ("CVMC") to regulate commercial cannabis in the City of Chula Vista. In 2019, City began
processing its first cannabis business license applications. In processing license applications for non-
restricted license types,staff has had the opportunity to observe the factors and issues that result in rejection
of phase one license ap�plications. Based on such observations, Staff anticipates that certain applicants may
be able to correct application deficiencies or remove associated persons with disqualifying criminal histories
and,upon subsequent reapplication,be deemed qualified and proceed to City licensure.
1111. 0 0 1 P �3ge 1
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 18,5 of 208
Staff currently plans to re-open the application period for non-retail license types in late, February or early
March 2020. As CVMC 5.19.050D.1 is currently dr�afted,in cases where a phase one or phase two application
was denied or in cases where a conditional license has expired, no applicant or person named therein is
eligible to submit a new phase one application until one year after the date of denial or expiration. The
municipal code, as currently drafted, therefore prohibits rejected applicants and persons from reapplying
within one year after the,ir re,jection. Staff recommends that the restriction currently contained in
5.19.05O.D.1 be removed in order to allow rejected applicants to reapp�ly during any new application period
without an associated waiting period,.
DECISION-MAKER C"ONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and
consequently, the real property holdings of the City Council members do not create a disqualifying real
property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal.Gov't Code§87100,et seq.).
Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact
that may constitute a basis for decisio�n-maker conflict of interest in this matter.
CURRENT-YEAR.FISCAL IMPACT
The subject amendment to 5.19.050.D may result in an increase in the number of non-retail cannabis
businesses operating in the City during calendar year 2020, which could result in increased tax revenue.
However,it is difficult and speculative to predict whether and when such revenue would be received,and in
what amounts.,
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
The subject amendment to 5.19.050.1) may result in an increase in the number of non-retail cannabis
businesses operating in the City during calendar year 2020, which could result in increased tax revenue.
However,it is difficult and speculative to predict whether and when such revenue would be received,and in
what amounts.
MYTACHMENTS
1. Proposed Ordinance
2. Proposed amended 5.19.050.1) red-line str�ikeout version
Staff Contact:Kelley Bacon;Megan McClurg
P �3ge 2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 18,6 of 208
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA
VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.19.050.D TO ELIMINATE ONE-
YEAR WAITING PERIOD APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN NEW CANNABIS
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICANTS (FIRST READING)
WHEREAS, pursuant to its police powers, including but not limited to California
Constitution Article XI, Section 5(b) authority over municipal afflairs, the City of Chula Vista has
general authority over the public health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, under California Business and Professions Code section 26200(a)(1), local
jurisdictions are authorized to either permit and regulate or prohibit the operation of cannabis
businesses within their boundaries; and
WHEREAS,, Chula Vista Municipal Code chapter 5.19 identifies and describes the City's
regulatory structure for Commercial Cannabis Businesses;
WHEREAS,, Chula Vista Municipal Code section 5.19.050.D contains general rules
regarding the City of Chula Vista's cannabis license application process; and
WHEREAS, a provision requiring certain applicants to wait twelve months prior to
reapplying for a commercial cannabis license is unnecessary and prevents the submission of
applications that may otherwise qualify for licens,ure; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments do not cause a substantial change to the
objectives and policies contained in Chula Vista Municipal Code chapter 5.19, 'but instead
facilitate City's ability to imp�lement such objectives and policies;
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to authorize lawful cannabis businesses to
operate in the City of Chula Vista, subject to the City's identified regulations and restrictions;
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
Section 1.
A. Chapter 5, Section 5.19.050.D of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is amended to read as
follows:
D. General Rule,�.
1. Phase One and Phase Two applications shall include such supplemental, materials as
required by the rules and regulations adopted pursuant hereto. The City may, at the City
Manager's discretion, require additional documentation associated with, any application as
may be necessary to enforce the requirements of State Laws and this Code.
C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Tei-np\BCL Technologies\easyPD F 8\@,BCL@,BC0EEF24\@�),BCL@
,BCOEEF24,doc
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 18,7 of 208
Ordinance
Page 2
2. Applicants shall have no right to operate under a City License until a City License! is
actually issued thereto by the City. Each Applicant assumes the risk that, at any time prior to
the issuance of a license,, the! City Council may terminate or delay the!program created under
this chapter.
3. Issuance of a City License does not create a land use entitlement. Furthermore, no City
License will be officially issued and no Applicant awarded a City License may begin
0
operations until the City Licensee is fully in compliance with all State and local laws and
regulations, including but not limited to State Laws.
4. The City reserves the right to reject or approve any and all applications and conditional
licenses based on the standards set forth in this chapter, or otherwise in its sole discretion,
taking into account the health, safety and welfare of the community, and in accordance with
its general police powers authority.
Section 11. Sever,ability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for
any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenfo�rceability or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the
Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of
Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase
of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses
or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section 111. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this, Ordinance shall be construed in
light of that intent.
Section IV. Effective D�ate
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage.
Section V. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Gary Halbert Glen R. Googins
City Manager City Attorney
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 18,8 of 208
5.19,.050 City license application process I Chula Vista Municipal Code Page 1 of 1
5,19,0510 City license application process.
'The following procedures shall govern the application process for the issuance of any City License
under this chapter:
[Sections 5.79.050 (A) through (C) remain unchanged.]
D. General Rules.
j... .y-4 i-c:e,i,-i-s ca.....
..w-41-be...q�u-44-fi-edt o-.....s-L-i-l-a n,ex w...Rfi-a-seQn-e----
L-i-n- �e...of ....f tfi-ca..(4a-te---k-)--f-44:i--ca---d--en-Ja-1...(--)--r...exx-p tica-tri-G-nx:
12. Phase One and Phase Two applications shall include such supplemental materials as
required by the rules and regulations adopted pursuant hereto. The City may, at the City
Manager's discretion, require additional documentation associated with any application as may
be necessary to enforce the requirements of State Laws and this Code.
2,-�'3. Applicants shall have no right to operate under a City License until a City License is actually
issued thereto by the City. Each Applicant assumes the risk that, at any time prior to the issuance
of'a license, the City Council may terminate or delay the program created under this chapter.
3.4. Issuance of'a City License does not create a land use entitlement. Furthermore, no City
License will be officially issued and no Applicant awarded a City License may begin operations
until the City Licensee is fully in compliance with all State and local laws and regulations,
including but not limited to State Laws.
4-5. The City reserves the right to reject or approve any and all applications and conditional
licenses based on the standards set forth in this chapter, or otherwise in its sole discretion,
taking into account the health, safety and welfare of the community, and in accordance with its
general police powers authority.
[Section 5.19.050 (E) remains unchanged.]
The Chula Vista �Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 3466, passed November 12, 2019.
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 18,9 of 208
NO
(_'40��U NCI' L
1,TY
AGEND(,A ST,A"rEM,E,N'T�
CIT Y OF
CHULAVISTA
January 14, 2 0 2 0 File ID: 20-0009
T1`TLE
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF'THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING'THE AMENDED MEASURE
A PUBLIC SAFETY EXPENDITURE PLAN TO ADD THREE PEACE OFFICERS, ONE POLICE AGENT, AND FOR
THE, NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION UNIT, ONE PARALEGAL AND ONE CITY ATTORNEY INVESTIGATOR;
AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020 EXPENDITURE BUDGET FOR THE MEASURE A SALES TAX FUND
TO FUND SUCH POSITIONS OUT OF MEASURE A- POLICE DEPARTMENT AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE (4/5
VOTE REQUIRED)
RECOMMENDED AC'TION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
On February 13, 20,18, the City Council accepted the recommendations of the Pubilic Safety Advisory
Committee to adopt the Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan (PSEP). 'The PSEP presented the intended
expenditures of approximately$18M per year if a half-cent general sales tax measure passed. The intended
plan was a guide on how the funds could be allocated based on the critical needs identified by the Police
and Fire Departments. The plan also assumed that both the Police Department and Fire Department would
each be allocated,through the budget process,approximately$9M annually from the sales tax,with the goal
of addressing public safety understaffing and improving response times.
On June 5, 2018,the, People of the City of Chula Vista approved Measure A authorizing a one-half cent sales
tax on retail sales within the City., The collection of the sales tax began on October 1, 2018.
On December 18, 2018, the City Council approved resolutions amending the Measure A Public Safety
Expenditure Plan- and amending the Fiscal Year 2019 Operating Budget- adding authorized staffing of
P P
various City departments; and approving a side letter between the City of Chula Vista and International
Association of Fire Fighters, Local 2180 (IAFF).
On June 4, 2019, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2020 Proposed Budget that established the
Measure A appropriations and adding authorized staffing of various City departments.
P a g e
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 190 of 208
On June 18, 2019, the City Council approved a reso�lutio�n amending the Measure A PSEP; updating
Measure A sales tax revenue assumptions; staffing changes for both the Police and Fire departments, and
updated expenditures.
On July 11, 2019,the Measure A COC voted to support amendments to the Public Safety Expenditure Plan to
add two Digital Forensics Technician 11 positions to meet the Police Department's need to collect, handle,
process,and analyze digital evidence for police investigations and for criminal prosecutions.
On December 3, 2019�, the City Council approved resolutions amending the Measure A Public Safety
Expenditure Plan; and amending the Fiscal Year 2020 Operating Budget- and adding authorized staffing to
the Police and Fire Departments.
On December 12, 2019,the Measure A COC voted to support amendments to the Public Safety Expenditure
Plan to add one Police Agent and three Peace Officer positions to meet the Police Department I s need to
combat illegal cannabis operations. Additionally, the City Attorney's Office proposed amendments to the
Public Safety Expenditure Plan to add one Paralegal and one Investigator for the Neighborhood Protection
Unit.
This item presents the proposed amendments to the Measure A Expenditure Plan and FY 19/20 Measure,A
budget to implement these staffing additions. Funding would be allocated out of existing Measure A Police
Department available fund balance.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project)10 as defined under
Section 1,5378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment;
therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CE�QA Guidelines,the activity is not subject to CEQA.
Thus,no environmental review is required.
BOARD�/COMMISSION/COMMI,"r,"rEE RECOMMENDATION
At the December 12, 2019, Measure A Citizen's Oversight Committee (COC) meeting,the Police Department
and City Attorney presented on the proposed plan included staffing changes for both the Police and City
Attorney Departments,along with updated expenditures.The COC voted to support the Police Department's
proposed amendments to the PSEP.The COC voted 4-2 in favor of Measure A funding the Paralegal and City
Attorney Investigator,as requested;however a minimum of(6) affirmative votes are needed for official COC
action.
DISCUSSION
PO�LICE DEPARTMENT
With the successful passage of the Measure A Sales Tax,staff is moving forward with implementation of the
Public Safety Expenditure Plan (PSEP). At this time,the Police Department is requesting to approve minor
modifications to the P'SEP'.
P a g e 2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 191 of 208
Recognizing that the demands of our community and the needs of the organization continue to evolve, the
Police Department is proposing to hire additional positions relating to cannabis business regulation and
licensing.
On November 6,2018,the voters of the City of Chula Vista enacted Measure Q,opening a pathway to licensed
and regulated cannabis businesses within the city.Since then,the Police Department has noted a spike in the
presence of illegal cannabis operations across the city. Each illegal cannabis operation has resulted in a
variety of crime and safety concerns for the surrounding community, significant public concerns relating to
the health and safety of the operations, and an increase in the number of community complaints relating to
the illegal operations.
In preparation for the crime and safety impacts,that would likely parallel a newly-regulated cannabis market,
the Police Department previously recommended the addition of both sworn and civilian positions to focus
on the regulation and licensing of legal cannabis businesses, and to focus on the enforcement of state and
local laws prohibiting illegal cannab�is operations.
During CY 2018, staff hosted a variety of public forums and presentations related to potential cannabis
regulations. Staff had projected that the costs associated with the licensing and regulation of legal
establishments would be borne primarily by regulatory fees and taxes related to cannabis businesses. But a
funding source was not identified for the costs related to the prohibition of illegal cannabis operations and
was intended to be considered as a part of future general fund budget allocations.
Since the passage of Measure Q,the process of evaluating and licensing legal operators has begun but is still
several months from completion. In the meantime, illegal cannabis operators have already had a significant
impact on community safety and increased demand for police investigations. Illegal and unpermitted
marijuana dispensaries pose a significant health and safety hazard to the public. In addition to traffic
congestion and crime and disorder problems,unpermitted dispensaries usually have significant building and
code violations which could be deadly in the event of a fire or other emergency that may require a quick
evacuation. Illegal businesses often include barricaded exit points and magnetic locking systems that do not
unlock in the event of a fire or power outage, potentially trapping persons within. The operators are
frequently known to sell products that mimic candies and other youth-oriented treats,and preventing access
to youth has been a priority for the Police Department. In addition, the department has discovered the
presence of firearms is a frequent occurrence at illegal dispensaries. Simply put,illegal cannabis operations
tend to be high-cash,fast moving businesses replete with crime,weapons,and a lot to lose.
Since 2014, police investigations have been conducted on dozens of illegal cannabis dispensaries, resulting
in the closure of 39 illegal operators. As of the date of this report, there are at least 15 known illegal
dispensaries operating within the city.The investigation of each illegal dispensary requires in excess of 120
hours of staff time,at a cost of more than$2 0,00 0 each.,With the support of Measure A,the City Attorney has
hired a city prosecutor to assist in the enforcement effort. But,although revenue from legal cannabis has yet
to be collected,additional investigative resources are,necessary to combat illegal operations.
To address the growing impact of illegal and unregulated cannabis sales, staff recommends the addition of
positions previously connected to crime related to illegal cannabis operations,.'These include:
0 4.00 sworn positions, to include 1 investigator primarily focused on illegal and non-regulated
operations, 2 homeless outreach officers primarily focused on outreach combating drug impacts
P a g e 13
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 192 of 208
within the homeless population, and 1 School Resource Officer primarily focused on scholastic
campaigns and youth anti-drug education efforts.
The chart below outlines the Police Department's proposed changes (highlighted in yellow)to the PSEP.
Proposed Police Department Pubfic Safety Expenditure Plan
Position FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 Total
POLICE SERGEANT 3.0 2.0 1.0 6.0
POLICE AGENT 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 8.0
PEACE OFFICER 4.0 6.0 S.0 S.0 1.0 21.0
SWORN FTE TOTAL 5.0 11.0 10.0 8.0 1.0 35.0
CIVILIAN BACKGROUND INVESTIGATOR 1-0 1.0
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER 2.0 2.0
DIGITAL,FORENSICS TECHNICIAN 11 2.0 2.0
COMMUNICATIONS CENTER MANAGER 1.0 1.0
POLICE DISPATCHER 2.0 5.0 7.0
SR. POLICE TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST 1.0 1.0
CIVILIAN FTE TOTAL 4.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0
POLICE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 9.0 21.0 10.0 8.0 1.0 49.0
It is important to note that the licensing and baclkgrounding process of the legal cannabis industry will be an
ongoing operation utilizing police staff resources. Owners, operators, and employees of cannab�is
establishments will constantly change necessitating new background investigations on new owners and
employees. In addition, the department will have to review security plans and conduct inspections on a
regular,reoccurring basis.
The Police Department recognizes that current community demands, safety strategies, and staffing needs
will likely change in the future. The Police Department also recognizes that revenues and expenses used to
calculate current allocation plans may change in the future. PSEP recommendations for future years will
continue to be reevaluated,balanced against changes in revenue or expenditure projections,and considered
along with changing public safety trends and community needs. As a result,this Public Safety Expenditure
Plan is intended to be a"living document". Future recommendations may change.
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Role and functi"on of the Cl"lity,,,,,,,,,,,P,r,,osecutor and the N,gighborhood Protection Unit
NPU is, to work closely with the Police Department and Code Enforcement to address neighborhood crime
and disorder not otherwise being addressed by the District Attorney's Office or civil code enforcement
efforts., The City Prosecutor's authority extends to all violations of the Municipal Code, as well as a small
number of state code offenses. Prosecuting authority is limited to misdemeanors, as felony prosecution is
within the exclusive jurisdiction of the District Attorney.
P a g e 4
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 193 of 208
The Police Department will investigate crimes, and then may submit the case to the City Prosecutor to be
reviewed for potential criminal charges, or other potential resolution. When cases are submitted for
evaluation, the City Prosecutor must review all available evidence, direct further investigation as needed,
and apply current law to the facts,using their professional judgment,to determine if charges can be proven
beyond a reasonable doubt.
The City Prosecutor is responsible for all stages of the criminal case including: preliminary case evaluations,
supplemental investigation, as necessary, filing charges, arraignment, filing and responding to pre-trial
motions, attending pre-trial hearings, settlement negotiations, trials, post-adjudication hearings, probation
hearings, and any appeals. The City Prosecutor is also responsible for the set-up and administration of
diversion and restorative justice programs and asset forfeiture.
NPU Staffing Needs
Criminal cases are labor intensive and move at a very fast pace s,ince criminal defendants have a statutory
right to be brought to trial within 45 (calendar) days of arraignment(30 days if they are in custody)�.In order
to properly manage such cases, it is standard practice for a prosecuting agency (whether a City Prosecutor
or District Attorney) to have support staff, including paralegals and investigators. This support staff is vital
to run an effective prosecution unit. 'Tasks such as case intake, data entry, mailings, correspondence, and
other administrative jobs can be, and typically are, handled by support staff. This allows the prosecuting
attorney to handle more complex matters and to manage a larger caseload.
An adept and well-qualified paralegal is necessary to meet the expectations of today's modern prosecutorial
requirements.The Paralegal's responsibilities will include:
• Prepare and draft legal memos and pleadings,perform legal research
• Obtain,review and process body worn camera,social media,and other technology
• Handle tasks such as case intake,data entry,mailings, correspondence,and other administrative tasks
• During a trial,the Paralegal will make sure that cases are appropriately managed and progressing
•Administer the Asset Forfeiture Program
•Assist with set-up and administration of diversion programs
An investigator plays a critical role in preparing a case for trial and performs functions that the attorney
cannot.The City Attorney Investigator would be responsible for:
• Obtaining dockets/court records
•Gathering documentary evidence like taking photos,obtaining certified records,DMV records,and criminal
history
• Locating and serving civilian witnesses with subpoenas
• PostinR and serving cease and desist notices
• Investigating businesses with the Secretary of State, Bureau of Cannabis Control&other state agencies
The Paralegal and Investigator positions have been created and approved by the City Council during the
budget process. The proposed action would fund the Paralegal and Investigator positions using Measure A
funding starting this fiscal year. Measure A already funds the Prosecutor position for the NPU.
P a g e 5
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 194 of 208
NPU Advancement of Police Department,Community and Measure A Objectives
It is clear that the issue of public safety and reduction of crime is a top priority for the citizens of Chula Vista,
as well as the various departments that serve the City. The main goal of Measure A is to fund efforts that will
improve public safety and provide better service to the community. The Neighborhood Protection Unit is an
integral part of this goal.,
The City Prosecutor is directly addressing public safety issues facing the City and acts as an extension of the
Police Department. The Prosecutor supports an outlined goal for the Police Department to "Improve
investigative capacity and follow up in all major investigative units to maximize successful case resolution
and provide better customer service to victims"[Public Safety Expenditure Plan,2113120181.
Currently there are many areas where there is preliminary police involvement but there is no prosecutorial
follow-up or definitive case resolution. Such matters include; health and safety issues related to Code
Enforcement, municipal code traffic enforcement, as well as other quality of life issues. The City Prosecutor
will directly provide this follow-up to ensure more positive case resolution and provide better service to
victims and the community.,For example,if the new"boots on the ground"that have been added to the police
force are out in the community taking enforcement action and writing citations,but the citations are never
addressed by the court,or no one is held accountable for their actions,then essentially this is not an effective
use of the officers'time, energy,and resources.
Officers currently face a "lack of proactive time to address community problems other than priority calls"
[Public Safety Staffing Strategies Report, 1219120171. The Neighbo�rho�o�d Protection Unit can provide this
attention to community problems, allowing officers to focus on priority calls. There is currently a range of
crimes that often fall through the cracks in court and are not properly addressed., Offenders are not held
accountable, they suffer no consequences, and the message that is sent is that the law can be violated with
no or little repercussions. 'The, Neighborhood Protection Unit's goal is to address these crimes and issues
that are not getting the attention they need and deserve. The Prosecutor is essential to give these
enforcement activities the potential for a deterrent effect and meaningful,positiveimpact on the community,.
The City Prosecutor is uniquely positioned to respond dynamically to the needs of the community. They can
respond to issues as they arise, determining what would be the best practice or approach to take when
addressing the various crimes or issues,that the City may be facing at any given time. This flexibility gives a
great benefit to the City and the community because the Prosecutor is responding directly to the co�mmunity's
needs.,
The first priority that has been identified for the NPU is the need to address the illegal cannabis businesses
that have flooded the City. The immediate prosecution of these cases aligns directly with the Police
Department's goal of addressing the growing impact of illegal and unregulated cannab�is sales. But, the
Prosecutor needs support staff in order to be able handle a multi-case workload,and prosecute higher-level
owners and operates of the illegal businesses. This is a critical time to focus and enhance City enforcement
efforts as the City prepares to license legal cannabis business operations.Illegal operations pose a significant
public health and safety concerns,and if left unchecked will reduce city revenue from licensed businesses.
P a g e 16
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 195 of 208
Various efforts throughout the years have been taken to add criminal prosecution capacity to the City, but
there has been no continuity because there was no continuity in funding., Measure A provides the continuous
funding essential to ensure the success and development of the Neighborhood Protection Unit. The Unit is
focused solely on the needs of the community. The Unit has already reached a critical stage where capacity
is essentially exhausted. The Unit cannot develop and move forward, either in a faster pace/volume for the
cannabis cases already being addressed, or to even consider expanding into new areas of concern because
there are insufficient resources at this,time.,
In order to provide solid follow-through on criminal investigations, and to maximize successful case
resolution,the City Prosecutor,requires the minimal amount of additional support and resources requested.
MEASURE A POSITION ADJUSTMENTS
The following tab�le represents the proposed position count amendments for Fiscal Year 20�20 related to the
proposed actions. The Measure A Fund will see a net increase of 4.00 FTEs for the Police Department and a
net increase of 2.00 FTEs for the City Attorney's Office.These positions will be funded using Measure A
Police Department available fund balance.
Department Fund Posi'tion Title FTE
Police Agent I
Police Department Measure A
Peace Officer 3
Department Fund Posintimon Title FTE
Neighborhood Measure A Paralegal 1
Protection Unit City Attorney Investigator 1
Total Police Department and City Attorney's Office 6
Net Posintimon Increase
DE,CISION-MAKE,R CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and
consequently, the real property holdings of the City Council members do not create a disqualifying real
property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act(Cal.,Govt Code§87100,et seq.,)�.
Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact
that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter.
P a g e 7
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 196 of 208
CURRENT-YEAR FISCA1,IMPACT
Adding one (1) Police Agent and three (3) Peace Officers to the Police Department section of the Measure A
fund and amend the fiscal year 2019-2020 expenditure budget in the Measure A fund as indicated in the table
below.
Cost Descriopti0on FY20
3 PEACE OFFICERS $302j740
1 POLICE AGENT $103)243
SWORN NON-PERSONNEL COSTS $36,919
TOTAL FISCAL IMPACT' $442�902
Adding one (1) Paralegal and one (1) City Attorney Investigator and amending the expenditure budget in
fiscal year 2019-2020 as indicated in the table below.'The two additional positions are expected to be hired
by March 2020. Unprogrammed Measure A Police share of revenues exist to fund these personnel costs,for
the remainder of FY 19-20.
Cost Descrioption FY20
1PARALEGAL $119)326
1 CITY ATTORNEY INVESTIGATOR $129)574
TOTAL FISCAL IMPACT $24%9
At the end of fiscal year 2019,the Measure A allocation for the Police Department had available fund balance
of approximately$6.,3 million.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
The PSEP anticipates that the one-half cent sales tax increase would generate between$19.0 million in Fiscal
Year 2020 and $21.0 million in Fiscal Year 2030. As part of the City's annual budget process, annual
allocations to the Measure A Sales Tax Fund would be brought forward for City Council consideration and
action. In accordance with the Ordinance, for each sub�sequent year after Fiscal Year 2020, prior to City
Council consideration of the City's annual budget, staff will prepare and present to the Citizens' Oversight
Committee for its review a spending plan for Measure A revenues.The positions outlined in this report will
be included in the Fiscal Year 2021 budget in Measure A�- Police Department.
ATTACHMENTS
None.,
Staff Contact: Roxana Kennedy, Chief of Police
Glen Googins, CityAttorney
P a g e 8
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 197 of 208
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AMENDED MEASURE A
PUBLIC SAFETY EXPENDITURE PLAN TO ADD THREE
PEACE OFFICERS, ONE POLICE AGENT, AND FOR THE
NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION UNIT, ONE PARALEGAL
AND ONE CITY ATTORNEY INVESTIGATOR; AND
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020 EXPENDITURE
BUDGET FOR THE MEASURE A SALES TAX FUND TO
FUND SUCH POSITIONS OUT OF' MEASURE A - POLICE
DEPARTMENT AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE
WHEREASI on February 27, 2018 the City Council approved Ordinance 3415
("Ordinance") proposing to add Chapter 3.34 to Title 3 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code
establishing a one-half cent General Transactions and use Tax to be administered by the California
Department of Tax and Fee administration; and
WHEREAS, concurrently the City Council adopted a spending plan expressing its
intention to expend any new sales tax revenues generated un the Ordinance on public safety (the
"Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan"); and
WHEREAS,the Ordinance was placed on the ballot for the June 2018 election as"Measure
A�11 subject to approval by an affirmative, simple majority vote of the people as required by law;
and
WHEREAS, on June 51, 2018, the voters of the City of Chula Vista approved Measure A
authorizing a one-half cent sales tax on retail sales within the City; and
WHEREAS, on December 12, 20�191 City staff presented to the Measure A Citizens
Oversight Committee(COC)a proposed amendment to the Intended Expenditure Plan to add three
(3) Peace Officers, one (1) Police Agent, and, for the Neighborhood Protection Unit (NPU), one
(1) Paralegal and one (1) City Attorney Investigator; and
WHEREAS, the Measure A COC voted 6-0 to recommend City Council approval of the
Peace Officer and Police Agent positions, and �4-2 (no official action taken) vote of the NPU
positions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
that it approves an amended Measure A Public Safety Expenditure Plan to add three (3) Peace
Officers, one (1) Police Agent, and for the Neighborhood Protection Unit one (1) Paralegal, and
one (1) City Attorney Investigator; and amends fiscal year 2020 expenditure budget for the
M easure A sales tax fund to fund such positions out of Measure A Police Department available
fund balance.
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 198 of 208
Presented by Approved as to form by
Chief Roxana Kennedy Glen R. Googins
Police Department City Attorney
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 199 of 208
I I'll...................I
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
X 71 10" 'llas 'alas
Mary Uasl
ME�IMO
January 9, 2020
TO: Kerry Bigelow, City Clerk
CC: Sheree Kansas, Deputy City Clerk 11
VIA'-' Adrianna Hernandez, Sr. Council Aide
FROM: Mayor Mary Casillas Salas
RE: Boards and Commissions Appointments
The Mayor would like to recommend Joycelyn Persichil'li for appointment to the Commission on
Aging and Bernardo Andrade for appointment to the International Friendship Commission. Ms.
Persichilli will replace Rochelle Carroll and Mr. Andrade will replace Sally Boucree.
Please place this item on the January 14, 2020 Council agenda for ratification and schedule the
oaths of office for the following council meeting.
Thank you.
276 Fo�urth Avenuee Chula Vista e California 91910 o(619) 691-5044 @ Fax (6�19)476-5379
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet msalas@chulavistaca.gov Page 200 of 208
&Post-Cornsumer Recycivil Poper
Angela Larson
From: Webmaster
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 7:21 AM
To: CityClerk; Adrianna Hernandez; Lynnette Tessitore
Subject: City of Chula Vista: International Friendship Commission Application - Web form
A new entry to a form/survey has been submitted.
Form Name: International Friendship Commission Application
Date&Time: 06/17/2019 7:20 AM
Response#: 32
Submitter ID: 63810
11P address: 172.24.96.110
Time to complete: 14 min.,8 sec.
Survey Details
.................... ....................
Page I
Application for membership on the International Friendship Commission
1. Prefix
(o) Mr.
2. First and Last Name
Bernardo Andrade
3. E-mail
4. Home Address
5. city
Chula Vista
6. ZIP code
91910
7. Primary Phone
8. Secondary Phone
Not answered
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 201 of 208
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
9. Are you registered to vote in Chula Vista?
(o)Yes
10. Do you live within the City limits of Chula Vista?
(o)Yes
11. How Long?
7
12. Present employer
Dr. Bronner's&Southwestern Community College
13. Occupation
Sr. Logistics Manager&Logistics Professor
14. Are you currently serving on a Chula Vista Board/Commission?
(o) No
15. Which one(s)?
Not answered
16. Have you previously served on a Chula Vista Board/Commission?
(o) No
17. Which ones?
Not answered
18. Per Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.25.030, 1 understand:
-if I am currently serving on a board or commission,,I must resign from my current board or commission if I am appointed.
-1 must have served at least 12 months on my current board or commission in order to be appointed to another board or
commission.
(o) I have read and acknowledged the above statement.
19. Are you or have you been involved in any local,,civic or community groups?
(o)Yes
20. Which ones?
Secretary/Treasurer of HOA
21. What are your principal areas of interest in our City government,,and what experience or special knowledge can you bring
to those areas?
I have 15+years of professional and academic experience in the areas of international business,global supply chains, logistics
&transportation and business development. I've worked for the past 8 years with a certified fair-trade organization that
engages in fair trade business practices that benefit our local communities.As well, I've been a professor at SWC since 2009,a
passion that I fully enjoy. I hold a M BA and two international business degrees that can support my knowledge in the
aforementioned. I'm fluent in Spanish and advance levels in both Italian and French languages.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 202 of 208
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Areas of interest: international business, investment,culture exchange,academia,city beautification,partnerships,safety and
security,technology.
22. What would you hope to accomplish in the role of a International Friendship Commissioner?(250 words or less)
I want to participate in the council sharing my knowledge and experience and contributing to the international exposure and
development of the city. Promote multicultural relationships and extend our international partnerships.Attract foreign and
local business opportunities that can mutually benefit our communities.
23. You may upload a resume in addition to your application(optional).
Ben ny-Andrade—Busi ness—Resu me.pdf
24. The City understands meeting schedules and individual's availability may change.We ask that you consider the meeting
schedule when submitting an application.
(o) I have reviewed the International Friendship Commission regular meeting date,,time and frequency.
25.
(o) I am familiar with the responsibilities of the International Friendship Commission. I attest that the information I have
provided is accurate and true.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Thank you,
City of Chula Vista
This is an automated message generated by the Vision Content Management System"m.Please do not reply directly to this email.
3
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 203 of 208
B"ERNARDO ANDRADE
������Chula Vista,CA 919 10 0 0
Accomplished business professional with vast experience in supply chain, logistics and operations. Deep
knowledge of international sales, protocol and procedures. Skilled in facing challenges, growing existing business
while saving costs.
Professional Experience
Dr.Bronner's Magic Soaps
Senior Logistics Manager 712017—Present
Logistics Manager 412014— 712014
Logistics Coordinator 812011—412014
Under direct report of COO, developed policies and procedures for supply chain and logistics responsibilities while
managing headquarters' distribution center and personnel. Plan and implement material flow management systems
in order to meet production requirements for both domestic and international company's facilities. Train shipping
department personnel in roles and responsibilities regarding domestic and global logistics strategies. Communicate
with logistics partners to orchestrate domestic and international shipments in a timely and cost effective manner.
Ensure that company's global supply chain is properly functioning; Maintain metrics, reports, process
documentation, customer service logs, training and safety records. Provide market research support and fall
spectrum of international market analysis to company's President. Contributed to over$1 M in operational savings.
Preferred Global Logistics 2'010—2011
Business Development Manager
Identified and developed both new and follow-on business opportunities that generated profitable growth
opportunities. International sales and leads through prospecting, warm-calling and networking. Implemented follow-
up strategies to increase revenue and drove customer loyalty; formulated strategy while providing support in import-
export endeavors; Contracts development and business negotiations. Provided support to management in budgeting,
monitoring,reporting,communication and liaison.
Multimodal Esquer,Inc.
Operations Manager 2'004—2009
Account Manager/Customer Service 2'003—2004
Managed a 30+ truck fleet in an efficient, cost-effective manner; Staffed, structured, and maintained a productive
team of highly qualified truck operators; Identified and expanded backhaul revenue by negotiating transportation
rates with 3 rd party carriers; Optimized moves based on geographic areas and costs; Observed dispatch and delivery
processes and ensured that all SOPs were established, followed and continually improved; Provided excellent
customer service and leadership of the team.
Managed and serve as customer representative for company's accounts. Built relationships with customers and
partner-carriers. Book and arrange shipments based on customer commitments and requirements. Resolve any issues
that may arise in load pickup and delivery.
United States Department of Commerce 2'002—2'003
Intern
Coordinated market research to counseling U.S. companies seeking new international trade partners. Provided
support for international trade specialists with development of trade seminars,presentations and other projects.
1 1 P a g e
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 204 of 208
Academic/Teaching Experience
National University 201'8—Present
Supply Chain Management Adjunct Professor
Southwestern Community College 2010—Present
Logistics,Management and Transportation Adjunct Professor
CETYS Universidad 2009-2017
Logistics,Management and Transportation Aqjunct Prqfessor
Education
Executive Education Course,Supply Chain Management-, Driving Strategic Advantage 2013
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Cambridge,MA
Master's in Business Administration-Concentration in Supply Chain 2008
CETYS Universidad.,Tijuana,Mexico(Certified WASC);Graduated SUMA CUM LAUDE
BA International Business,Emphasis in North American Studies&English 2002
San Diego State University, San Diego,CA
Dual Degree MEXUS exchange program with.CETYS Universidad;Graduated CUM LAUDE
National's Deans List Award 2002-200�3 Recipient
Academic Continuing Education
International Business Institute for College Professors 2013
Michigan State University,,East Lansing,MI
Teaching Adult Learners 2013
Online Open Study—Central Institute of Technology,Australia
Languages&Skills
Spanish Native
Italian Prof�ssional& Conversational
French Prof�ssional& Conversational
ERP: SAGE Proficient
MS Office Proficient
Professional Affiliations
Southwestern College Logistics Advisory Committee 2007 to Present
Grupo BEA Business-Social Group 2010 to Present
Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals, Member 2010
Volunteer&Interests
Aspire-Encore at Rancho del Rey HOA, Secretary/Treasurer; San.Vicente Nursery Home, Active Volunteer;
Volunteer at Baja California Institute for Quality and Competitiveness;Frequent guest motivational speaker at
professional organizations and academic institutions.
2 1 P a g e
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 205 of 208
Angela Larson
From: Webmaster
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2019 10:37 PM
To: CityClerk; Adrianna Hernandez; Geovanna Gonzalez; Shaun Ellis
Subject: City of Chula Vista: Commission on Aging Application - Web form
A new entry to a form/survey has been submitted.
Form Name: Commission on Aging Application
Date&Time: 12/09/2019 10:37 PM
Response#: 16
Submitter ID: 68760
IP address: 2600:8801:a2OO:bO6:d85b:3796:4a57:15ad
Time to complete: 13 min.,50 sec.
Survey Details
..................
Page I
Application for membership on the Commission on Aging
1. Prefix
(0) MS.
2. First and Last Name
Joycelyn Persichilli
3. E-mail
4. Home Address
S. city
Chula Vista
6. ZIP code
91915
7. Primary Phone
8. Secondary Phone
Not answered
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 206 of 208
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
9. Are you registered to vote in Chula Vista?
(o)Yes
10. Do you live within the City limits of Chula Vista?
(o)Yes
11. How Long?
7 years currently(but grew up here)
12. Present employer
Retired
13. Occupation
Officer Administrator
14. Are you currently serving on a Chula Vista Board/Commission?
(o) No
15. Which one(s)?
N/A
16. Have you previously served on a Chula Vista Board/Commission?
(o) No
17. Which ones?
N/A
18. Per Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.25.030,,, 1 understand:
-if I am currently serving on a board or commission,I must resign from my current board or commission if I am
appointed.
-1 must have served at least 12 months on my current board or commission in order to be appointed to another board or
commission.
(o) I have read and acknowledged the above statement.
19. Are you or have you been involved in any local,civic or community groups?
(o)Yes
20. Which ones?
Local Toastmasters and Ombudsman for San Diego County
21. What are your principal areas of interest in our City government,,and what experience or special knowledge can you
bring to those areas?
My principal interest would be the senior population in our community.
I volunteer with Aging& Independence Services for the County of San Diego Health& Human Services as an Ombudman. In
this role I am an advocate for senior citizens to ensure that their rights are being met in board&care,skilled nursing and
assisted living facilities in San Diego County.The area that I cover is one skilled nursing facility in National City and five
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 207 of 208
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
RCFE's in Chula Vista.
I have a certification from the State of California as an RCFE Administrator.
I like staying active and giving back to my community. I have 20+years as a volunteer with Toastmasters International,a
non-profit organization devoted to helping people develop their communication and leadership skills. I have helped run the
local San Diego Chapter that consists of approx. 3000 members for the past 15 years. I currently hold the office of District
Finance Manager. My responsibilities:fiscal oversight and management of district funds.
Both my husband and I grew up in Chula Vista. My husband's job with the San Diego County Sheriff's Dept took us to north
county.Where we lived for 21 years before moving to downtown San Diego and then back to Chula Vista.
22. What would you hope to accomplish in the role of a Member of the Commission on Aging?(250 words or less)
As a member of the Commission of Aging I hope to be part of a team that works together with the city so that our citizens
will reap the benefits of the work done by it's members. I hope to further strengthen the work already done by the
members and help address concerns brought to our attention.
23. You may upload a resume in addition to your application(optional).
24. The City understands meeting schedules and individual's availability may change.We ask that you consider the meeting
schedule when submitting an application.
(o) I have reviewed the Commission on Aging regular meeting date,time and frequency.
25.
(o) I am familiar with the responsibilities of the Commission on Aging. I attest that the information I have provided is
accurate and true.
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Thank you,
City of Chula Vista
This is an automated message generated by the Vision Content Management System"'.Please do not reply directly to this email.
3
2020-01-14 Agenda Packet, Page 208 of 208