HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1981/02/03 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesdas, Februars 3, 1981 Council Chambers~ 276 Fourth Avenue
ROLL CALL
Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Scott, Gillow, Cox, McCandliss
Councilmen absent: None
Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Assistant City Manager
Asmus, Development Services Administrator Robens
The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hyde followed by a moment of silent
prayer.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR THE MEETING OF JANUARY 27~ 1981
MSUC (Gillow/Scott) to approve the minutes, copies having been sent to each Councilman.
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
a. Report of Port staff regarding the beach at "J" Street Marina
Mayor Hyde stated he had a request to continue this item.
MSUC (Scott/Cox) to continue this item to the meeting of February 10, 1981.
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
a. Bernadette Probus, Executive Director of "Our House", discussed the reduction of funds for
social services made recently by the County of San Diego. She said she was "advocating
for twenty-six different agencies in this First District" in asking the City to consider
committing some of its revenue sharing funds to "pick up the gap" left by the County.
Mayor Hyde noted the procedure Miss Probus should follow in requesting funds under
Community Promotions in the next budget. Councilman Scott commented on the budget
restraints of this City and the questionability of being able to fund these agencies.
b. James Matherls, 402 Oaklawn Avenue, Chula Vista, read a prepared speech opposing the
operation of the Tijuana Rapid Transit and his concern regarding the high government
debt and spending.
c. John Harris, Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission, requested that item #23
be moved up on the agenda.
MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to consider item #23 (Joint Powers Agreement for ballfields in
Sweetwater Regional Park)after Oral Communications.
d. Jerrs Valk, 291 Camino Vista Real, Chula Vista, expressed his strong opposition to the
City's using its revenue sharing funds to support social services.
23. Parks & Recreation Commission recommendation regarding Joint Powers Agreement between
the Cits of Chula Vista and San Diego County to construct ballfields in Sweetwater
Regional Park
The Commission requested Council to reconsider the proposed joint powers agreement
between the City of Chula Vista and San Diego County to construct the ballfields in
Sweetwater Regional Park. Chairman John Harris noted the lack of ballfields in the
City, the action of the County not to participate in the maintenance of the fields,
the drainage problem in this area associated with the golf course as well and the
desirability of the City operating the fields rather than a private contractor.
Assistant City Manager Asmus referred to his memo to thc Ooun¢i] in which he explained
that a private entity submitted a proposal to the County to construct a major sports
field in this area which would consist of six lighted fields, a pro shop, sporting
goods store and other recreational facilities. Ne stated that the County and the City
still have the funds in their Capital Improvement Program budgets pending the outcome
of the private contractor's proposal. Mr. Asmus added that the Parks & Recreation
Commission will be provided with periodic updates on this issue.
MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to accept the staff's report.
City Council Meeting - 2 - February 3, 1981
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. Request from South Bay Auto Wreckers to stack vehicles
The South Bay Auto Wreckers requested permission to stack vehicles two or more cars
high as long as they are not a "nuisance, unsightly or danger to the public".
MSUC (McCandliss/Hyde) to refer this item to staff.
b. Request from the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District for City to provide
contractual fire protection services
The Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District expressed its willingness to discuss
having the City provide contractual fire protection services to its area.
City Manager Cole recommended that the District be advised that the City does not believe
it is in the best interest to provide this service.
MS (Hyde/Gillow) to accept the City Manager's recommendation.
Council discussion followed on the advantages and disadvantages of providing this service,
the question of annexation of the area, the cost to the City, and National City's response
to this request.
.SUBSTITUTE MOTION:MSC (Cox/McCandliss) to refer this back to the staff and ask them to
contact the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District and come back to the Council with
a recommendation which would include the ultimate annexation of this area to the City.
Mayor Hyde voted "no".
Mayor Hyde spoke against the motion stating that a Special District is formed when no
other general purpose government is available to provide the service; however, there
comes a time when these special districts are no longer viable and should be terminated,
c. Claim against the City - Joseph Kerekes, 1119 21st Street, San Diego
The claim amount is for $30,000 for an alleged false arrest, assault and battery by the
Chula Vista Police on August 21, 1980. The claim was not filed within 100 days after
the incident as required by the Government Code and Carl Warren & Company recommend
denial.
MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) the claim be rejected for failure to file within the time limit
prescribed by Government Code, Sections 911.2 and 912.6.
d. Resignation of Jack Lohman - Design Review Committee
Mr. Lohman submitted his resignation due to the '~extreme time constraints on his full-
time profession".
~ISUC (Cox/Scott) that the resignation be accepted with regret and a letter of appreciation
sent to Mr. Lohman for his services on this Committee.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICATION FOR 1981-82 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
The Block Grant regulations require that the City Council hold two public hearings to
consider its application to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
for funding under the Community Development Block Grant Program.
This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing.
Community Development Director Desrochers explained that the first public hearing is
for the discussion of the draft budget and for Council direction regarding the complete
application which will be returned for approval after the second hearing. The draft
budget was submitted to all City Boards and Commissions and comments from those commissions
have been noted in the report sent to Council. Mr. Desrochers added that he was just
recently informed that the City's Block Grant funds will be reduced by $32,000 this
next year.
Mr. Bill Flohs, 545 Woodlawn #44, Chula Vista, spoke of the need to replace the Boys
Club facility when it is relocated to the Greg Rogers Park.
Mr. Charles R. Madden, 698 "H" Street, Chula Vista, representing Mueller SNAP Elementary
Committee, asked the Council to offset the loss ot the Boys Club and replace it with a
community center facility -- one that can be used by the children and senior citizens
as well.
City Council Meeting - 3 - February 3, 1981
5. PUBLIC HEARING -- (continued)
Mr. John Harris~ 635 Mission Courts Chula Vistas Chairman of the Parks & Recreation
Commission, asked that the funds be used to improve the access across Broadway,
"H" Street and "E" Street -- the busy intersections are keeping the children out of
the park areas.
Mr. Jer~y Valks 291Camino Vista Reals Chula Vista, declared his concern over the City
spending $551,000 to purchase one acre of land on "F" Street for a senior high-rise
building indicating that the money could have "gone a tOt further in this City".
Mr. Ser§io W. Stevens, 418 Oaklawn "C", Chula Vista, said he had no problem getting to
the Boys Club when he was going to Vista Square School and considered the Boys Club a
very important function in the community.
Mayor Hyde noted that the decision to move the Boys Club was made by its Board of
Directors, not the Council, as they wanted a more centrally located site to serve
the community.
Mayor Hyde questioned the item: "Construction of Neighborhood Center, Year 3, $225,000".
Community Development Director Desrochers explained that the Center was suggested to be
located west of Broadway, perhaps in the Feaster School area, utilizing the Greg Rogers
House moving it onto a public school site. The Center will provide social services and
neighborhood facilities in that area.
The Council discussed reviewing the entire matter at a Council Conference. Assistant
City Manager Asmus asked that the Conference be held off until the new Director of Parks
and Recreation comes on board -- sometime after March 2, 1981.
Further discussion involved the time element to submit this to SANDAG (San Diego
Association of Governments); the $2,000 set aside for the senior citizen referral center;
the question of availability of funds; the need for more creative writing in the
application before submittal to SANDAG.
MSUC (Hyde/Cox) (on page 2 of the report) the item identified as "Construction of Neigh-
borhood Center" be revised to indicate "Neighborhood Community Recreation Facilities".
(No problem with the amount as shown; but between what the amount will be and the local
option, this segment of the application can be adjusted either way).
MSUC (Hyde/McCandliss) to accept the report as modified and request that the staff come
back with clarifying information in two weeks with regard to the item just modified.
6a. PUBLIC HEARING (continued) -- CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE
THE DESIGNATION OF 19 ACRES IN THE VICINITY OF OTAY VALLEY ROAD AND
BRANDYWINE AVENUE FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO RESEARCH AND LIMITED
INDUSTRIAL
This being the time and place as advertised, the hearing was declared opened.
Director of Planning Peterson, referring to his written report, explained that the
hearing was continued from the meeting of January 6, 1981 to allow time to resolve
matters pertaining to the payment of the environmental review consultant. This payment
has now been made. The Environmental Impact Report was forwarded to the Council on
January 6, 1981.
Mr. Peterson discussed the existing land use, zoning and site conditions of the property
along with the adjacent zoning and land uses. In analysing the request, Mr. Peterson
concluded that the existing land use pattern of the Otay Valley Road/Brandywine Avenue
area and the aims and objectives of the General Plan of the City support the proposed
amendment and he would recommend amending the General Plan diagram from "Medium Density
Residential'' to "Research and Limited Industrial" in accordance with Planning Commission
Resolution GPA-81-1.
Mr. Dick Kau, applicant representing the property owners, asked the Council to accept
the recommendation of the Planning Commission and staff.
There being no further comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed.
b. RESOLUTION NO. 10387 - AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF 19 ACRES
IN THE VICINITY OF OTAY VALLEY ROAD AND BRANDYWINE TO RESEARCH
AND LIMITED INDUSTRIAL
City Council Meeting - 4 - February 3, 1981
6b. RESOLUTION NO. 10387 - (Continued)
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY Councilman Gillow, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous
consent, passed and adopted by a unanimous vote.
7. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC NECESSITY FOR ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF
PROPERTY OWNED BY UNITED ENTERPRISES, INC.
This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing.
City Engineer Lippitt, referring to the written report, explained that Otay Municipal
Water District plans to acquire a right-of-way for a needed water line through United
Enterprises' property in the vicinit~ of~Bra~¥~in~ Ayen~e.. Thi~ intention was formed
prior to submittal of .the Tentative M~p'~Tor~,~nu~'vis~a wOoas ano its subsequent approval
by the City in January ~978. The City Engineer noted that.acquisition of a smatl~,
additional width ~12 feet) would.allow Saphire Street to be built in accordance with the
conditions of approval for Chula Vista Woods. Additional land for drainage facilities
where the street would cross a small canyon would also be required. The staff's recom-
mendation is for Council to authorize condemnation proceedings to acquire the right-of-
way for Saphire Street and storm drain purposes.
Mr. Thomas Davies, 2550 Fifth Avenue, San Diego 92103, representing John Gardner, spoke
of the benefit to the public by reason of the condemnation. Mr. Davies explained that
the action was brought about when the Water District read a newspaper account of the last
meeting in August 1980; they contacted Mr. Gardner who was out of town; therefore, he
(Davies) contacted the Water District in which they informed Mr. Davies of their desire
to go forward with this.
Ms. Rose Patek, 1007 Fifth Avenue, San Die~o, representing United Enterprises, Inc., gave
the background of this issue prior to the Council meeting of January 13, 1981; the actions
of the Water District in its decision to construct a 12" loop waterline; the Water District's
"opportunity to get their intended waterline free by working with the developer through
the City"; the Environmental Impact Report; the difference between a "non-exclusive use"
and "fee simple" in taking title to the land; their conclusion that Chula Vista Woods does
not need this 12" waterline extension to service its development; possible alternate route
for access to the subdivision; United Enterprises' experience in legal condemnation cases
where severe severance damages were borne by the condemning party; the dangerous pre-
cedent in the City authorizing delegation to the private developers' attorney of the
power to act on behalf of the City for the condemnation; United Enterprises does not feel
this development meets the criteria set for public necessity but only for private develop-
ment; ask the Council not to join in with the other public and governmental entities "who
are constantly nibbling away at our lands" but to deny the developer's request.
RECESS was called at 9:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:38 p.m.
Mr. Bob Campbell, 43 Corte Maria, Chula Vista, representing the Otay Municipal Water
District, confirmed that the alignment being proposed tonight was not that as originally
stated in the Environmental Impact Report -- it has been changed three times which is
not unusual; the alignment proposed now is the most advantageous to all concerned. The
alignment, however, is still "in the corridor" as required by the report. Mr. Campbell
reiterated that in August 1980, Mr. Chapman, President of the Water District Board, read
an item in the local newspaper (August 1980) that the developers had been denied
access into their development. Mr. Chapman asked Mr. Campbell to call the developers to
see if the Water Company could assist them because this item was in the Water District's
§-year Capital Improvement Program. In attempting to contact Mr. Gardner, Mr. Campbell
was referred to Mr. Davies since Mr. Gardner was out of town. They met with the City
staff on this and the developers advised the Water District that they would be the ones
to seek the action under the eminent domain proceedings. The Water District had
originally intended to initiate the action and did write the Environmental Impact Report.
Mr. Campbell noted the former owners' plans to develop the area and the Water District's
decision to wait until that proposal developed. Ne added that the hospital does not
have an emergency water main and it is necessary to provide them with this backup system.
Mr. Ralph Barber, Engineer, representing Otay Municipal Water District, noted the route
of the 16" main which starts on Telegraph Canyon Road and runs through Greg Rogers Park
which was constructed in 1961. In 1976, the Water District constructed a new main to
serve the E1 Rancho del Rey area which cross-connected into Brandywine to give them the
flexibility in service.
City Council Meeting - 5 - February 4, 1981
7. PUBLIC HEARING -- (continued)
Mr. Jack Gardner, 4363 Grace Road~ Bonita, the developer, stated that he had his
engineers and the City staff study the alternate route offered by Rose Patek and it
was found to be infeasible because of the bad grades and future traffic problems. The
only solution for access to his proposed subdivision is the one offered this evening.
Ms. Rose Patek referred to the City Engineer's remark that if the access road on the
westerly boundary of United's property was involved, it would be in the County and the
City would have no part in it; however, Ms. Patek noted that the area south, where the
sewer line must eventually go, is also located in the County and questioned what the
City proposed to do then.
City Engineer Lippitt pointed out that the tentative map requires crossing which still
gives United Enterprises access for their equipment to go across the road, whether or
not it is fee or easement. Mr. Lippitt explained that the only difference is that ~f
the road is ever vacated in the future, the right-of-way will revert to the adjoining
properties whereby if it is "in fee", the road becomes municipal property to be sold.
There being no further comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed.
Council discussion on the requirement of a 4/5s vote for the passage of the resolution
and question of severence damages.
City Attorney Lindberg explained that the Council would appoint some selected attorney
to handle the condemnation with the total cost to be borne by the developer in this
case. If for some reason, the cost became prohibitive, the action could be abandoned
with no legal liability on the part of the City. In answer to the Council's further
questions,regarding having the Otay Municipal Water District be the lead agency in
undertaking the eminent domain proceedings, Mr. Lindberg indicated that rather than
making a final determination this evening, that after the disposition (of the Water
District making the proceeding to initiate the action for the 30'), the matter could
be brought back to the Council for determination. At that time, the Council could
adopt a resolution for condemnation of a 43' right of way.
MSUC (Scott/Hyde) to bring back a resolution at such time as the Council has a letter
from the Otay Municipal Water District as to their resolution indicating that they
have commenced eminent domain proceedings (a resolution from the Water District).
Councilman Scott explained that the City's resolution would be to either amend the
Water District's resolution to allow for 43' or that the City, at that time, would
consider taking condemnation action on its own.
Mayor Hyde clarified the motion stating that the City is placing the responsibility
for initiating the action upon the Otay Water District. The City Attorney added that
if the Water District adopts 'its~ resolution, it signifies that they are prepared to
go forward with the condemnation action; but rather than have them undertake that,
the City can adopt a resolution for the 43' and the matter will be undertaken totally
at the expense of the developer and the City would be simply exercising its paramount
right of eminent domain which will make it the lead agency.
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING
8. RESOLUTION NO. 10388 - ACCEPTING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In conjunction with the improvement of 1-54 Freeway, the State of California acquired
certain parcels of land for the construction of a bridge on North Second Avenue across
the Sweetwater River. Since the City has completed the construction of North Second
Avenue on a new alignment different from that of the State's, these parcels are no
longer needed by the State and they have agreed to deed the excess parcels to the City.
RESOLUTION OFFERED by Mayor Hyde, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous
consent, passed and adopted unanimously.
9. RESOLUTION NO. 10389 - APPROVING AGREEMENT ~ITH POUNTNE¥ & YOUNG, INC. FOR THE
PERFORMANCE OF A SEWER CONDITION SURVEY AND PREPARATION OF A
REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE SANITARY SEWER IN THE COUNTRY
CLUB AREA AND BETWEEN "G" AND "J" STREETS WEST OF BAY BOULEVARD
City Council Meeting - 6 - February 3, 1981
9. RESOLUTION NO. 10389 -- (continued)
The City has budgeted funds for two sewer projects in this year's Capital Improvement
Program. Project SI-06 budgeted funds to hire a consultant to investigate the existing
sewer lines in the Country Club area which have been a continuous maintenance problem
and expense to the City. The second project (SI-07 and BF-1) is for the reconstruction
of an existing concrete sewer main between "G" and "J" Streets along the Coronado branch
line of the railroad (west of I-5 freeway). Included in the $340,000 budgeted for these
two projects is $13,000 for engineering consultant fees to investigate and prepare a re-
port on the existing condition of the sewers and to make recommendations for corrective
action. The staff is recommending the firm of Pountney & Young, Inc. and for authoriza-
tion of expenditure of $28,000.
RESOLUTION OFFERED by Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous
consent, passed and adopted unanimously.
10. RESOLUTION NO. 10390 - ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR STEER SKID LOADER
Bids were received on January 26, 1981 for the purchase of the steer skid loader which
will be used by the sewer maintenance crew. The reconmendation is to accept the bids
and award the contract to the low bidder, Miramar Bobcat, Inc., in the amount of
$13,108.12.
RESOLUTION OFFERED by Councilwoman McCandliss, the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and adopted unanimously.
11. RESOLUTION NO. 10391 - ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PORTABLE RADIOS
The current budget provides for ten portable VHF-FM radios for use by the Police Patrol
Division. Bids were received January 26, 1981. The recommendation was for Council to
accept bids and award the contract to Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc.,
the low bidder, in the amount of $713.00.
RESOLUTION OFFERED by Councilman Cox, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous
consent, passed and adopted unanimously.
12. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 15.56 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REQUIRE THE
PAYMENT OF RELOCATION ASSISTANCE TO THE TENAHTS OF RESIDENTIAL
PROJECTS BEING CONVERTED TO CONDOMINIUM OWNERSHIP - FIRST READING
At the meeting of January 13, 1981, the Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance
providing for relocation assistance to those parties who occupy premises at the time of
commencement of the condominium conversion process and who are forced to move as a re-
sult of the conversion, and which sets the amount of the assistance at one month's
rent or $300,whichever is. greater, with an additional one month's rent or $300 for handi-
capped and elderly tenants, with the total reimbursement not to exceed $500.
Mr. Dick Kau, speaking on behalf of himself and Mr. Jon M. Miller, stated that adoption
of the ordinance would be one of penalizing the potential buyer as the cost would be
passed on. He felt this action was an improper function of a governing body and termed
it an "unfair tax".
For the record, Mayor Hyde noted the letter from Mr. Ken Baumgartner, McMillin Develop-
ment, Inc., opposing the action.
Mr. Gene York, 160 Brightwood, Chula Vista, spoke in opposition to the adoption of the
ordinance stating it was "social engineering" and also expressed his disfavor of having
government getting into this." Mr. York further opposed the double standard for the
senior citizens indicating the age limit should be raised to 70.
Councilwoman McCandliss asked for one week's continuance of the matter so that she
could get some more information which would help her in her decision.
MSUC (McCandliss/Hyde) to continue the matter for one week.
City Council Meeting - 7 - February 3, 1981
CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
13. RESOLUTION NO. 10392 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ACOUSTIC MATERIAL
INSTALLATION IN PARK WAY COMMUNITY CENTER
This item was continued from the last meeting to obtain more information for Council
regarding the use of Tectum wall panels and specification requirements.
Acting Director of Parks and Recreation Asmus submitted samples of the material to be
installed stating that he talked to the County's Health Services Department and was
told that there would be no health hazard associated with the installation of this
~ material.
RESOLUTION OFFERED by Councilwoman McCandliss, the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and adopted unanimously.
14. ORDINANCE NO. 1932 - PREZONING 2~ ACRES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET ~N THEVICINITY
~ ~A~E,DTF/V~'T(~' ~-~l~:13-~:~ Sq~C~O~D-~READ~IltB~--AlqI)-A~OPT~ON
The ordinance provides for the increase in density if the applicant includes in his
development some housing units which are affordable by low and moderate income families.
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. The text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted unanimously.
15. ORDINANCE NO. 1933 - PREZONING 3½ ACRES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET, WEST OF
WALNUT DRIVE TO R-3-P-8 - SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
The ordinance provides for an increase in density to 12 dwelling units per acre in ex-
change for the provision of affordable housing. The number of affordable units to be
provided is equivalent to the number of units above the number that would be allowed
under R-3-P-8 zoning.
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. The text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted unanimously.
16. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER
a. Report on water feature at Library
Development Services Administrator Robens stated that the landscape architect has
completed his preliminary work on the water feature and a report will be presented to
the Council next week.
MSUC (Scott/Cox) to accept the interim report.
b. Report on the Proposed Request for Proposals for Operation of The Glenn Restaurant
Assistant City Manager Asmus discussed the draft of the document submitted to the Council
for review and comment. He discussed allowing 30 days for submittal of the proposals;
option of the proposer to decide on any remodeling and renovation of the premises;
assurance that the public/golfers would be provided food and drink needs, banquet
facilities, and first-class dining and bar accommodations.
Mayor Hyde questioned the paragraph listing the options available to the bidders one of
which was that the restaurant could be open with only minor renovation and no contemplated
plans for remodeling at any time in the future. The Mayor stated that the Council wants
to see the restaurant remodeled.
MS (McCandliss/Hyde) to delete this c~ption from the Request for Proposals. The motion
carried with Councilmen Scott and Cox voting "no''.
MSUC (Hyde/McCandliss) to approve the RFP (Requests for Proposals) as amended.
c. Report on Proposed Tax Distribution Formula
Assistant City Manager Asmus reported on the meeting with the Board of Supervisors to
discuss the tax distribution proposal which was worked out by the Mayor's Committee
during the last several weeks.
City Council Meeting - 8 - February 3, 1981
16. c. Report on proposed tax distribution formula - (continued)
The Board of Supervisors essentially accepted the Mayors' proposal with only minor
alterations, subject to all cities in the County agreeing to the formula. The
recommendation is that the Council accept the negotiated property tax distribution
formula and direct that all other cities within the First Supervisorial District be
urged to conceptually approve the formula. Mr. Asmus explained the proposed formula
which he described as the "pool" concept -- all incremental growth taxes generated
by Special Districts going to the County if the property remained in the unincorporated
area, would be put into one pool and that amount of money then distributed after
annexation on the basis of proportionate share of taxes in terms of percentage that a
city receives on property al ready in the city. Money generated by Special Districts
would be split between the annexing city and county.
The Council commended Mr. Asmus for his work in getting this tax formula accepted by
the Board of Supervisors.
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to generally accept the negotiated property tax distribution formula
on behalf of the City of Chula Vista and direct that all other cities within the First
Supervisorial District be urged to conceptually approve the formula.
d. C~ty Manager Cole reported that the County will have a meeting tomorrow at 1:30 p.m.
(County Operations Building) at which time they would welcome anyone from the Council
to give input on the selection of the water feature.
e. City Manager Cole stated that there will be a Growth Management Policy Workshop for
the Council on Saturday, February 7, 1981 beginning at 8:00 a.m.
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS
17. Report on Modification of Traffic Si§nal Participation Policy
In response to Council's direction of September 1979, the City Engineer has prepared
a revised policy which emphasizes "first time" development and gives a list of fees
which would be reimbursed under the new policy.
It was the concurrence of the Council that this matter be continued for two weeks and
that Mr. Phil Creaser be notified of the continuance.
18. Report on Contract between the South Coast Organization Operating Transit (SCOOT) and
DC Associates for Professional Transit Consultant Services
Development Services Administrator Robens reported that the Metropolitan Transit
Development Board (MTDB) requires all transit operators within its jurisdiction to
prepare annually a "Five-Year Plan". Mr. Roberts indicated that based on the lack
of staff availability to complete the plan in a timely manner and certain important
CVT issues which the staff would like analyzed, he is recommending the hiring of a
consultant, DC Associates, at a cost of $15,000 (paid by the Transportation Develop-
ment Act (TDA) funds to do this study.
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to accept the report on the consultant contract between SCOOT and
DC Associates to assist SCOOT staff to prepare the Five-Year Plan Update (FY82-86) for
Chula Vista Transit (CVT).
19. Report on Regional Transit Issues
Services Administrator Robens submitted the report noting that in the
Development
past several months, the General Managers of the transit operators under the
Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) jurisdiction have been discussing
several issues pertaining to service coordination among the systems. Some of the
issues have resulted in cooperative agreements to improve operations and service
to the public, such as: development of a uniform fare structure; a regional pass
program and a metropolitan farebox recovery requirement.
MSUC (Hyde/Gillow) to accept the report.
20. Operations Analysis and Review of the City Clerk's Office
On October 21, 1980, the City Council directed the Policy Analysis and Program
Evaluation Director to make a comprehensive management review of the City Clerk's
office in order to assess the current major work processes to produce the most
efficient and effective services to the public, the City Council and the City
organization.
City Council Meeting - 9 - February 3, 1981
The City Clerk generally concurs with the findings except for two findings:
(1) implementation schedule for the Records Management Program and (2) that
there is a composite under utilization of one-half (.5) position as identified
in the report.
The recommendations were for Council to approve all report recommendations as to
(1) Records Management Program; (2) redistribution of work activities among the
employees; (3) curtailment of temporary positions; (4) centralization of
administrative authorization for all temporary positions in the City; (5) direct
City Clerk to implement the recommendations with the assistance of PAPE;
(6) for report~ to be made to the Council in six and twelve months or
(7) to schedule the entire report for a Council Conference.
MSUC (Scott/Hyde) to reschedule this matter when the Council has a '~light" agenda.
21. Report on Request to Waive Fees for a Carnival
The Southwestern College Associated Students Organization (ASO) requested a waiver
of fees for a proposed carnival to be held on Southwestern College property on
March 5 through March 8, 1981. The recommendation of the Acting Director of Parks
and Recreation is for approval subject to staff conditions.
Councilman Scott spoke against allowing the waiver of the fees. City Clerk Fulasz
commented that she was contacted by Joanna Palladino of the College who indicated
she would not be present this evening since the staff's recommendatioh was for
approval of the request.
MSUC (Hyde/Scott) to continue this matter for one week.
22. Report on American Cancer Society Request to Stage a Bike-a-Thon
The American Cancer Society requested permission to stage a Bike-a-Thon in the
City on Saturday, March 28, 1981, The recommendation of the Acting Director of
Parks and Recreation is for approval subject to staff conditions.
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to approve the request subject to staff conditions.
REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
23. Parks & Recreation Commission recommendation re~ardin~ Joint Powers Agreement between
the City and San Diego County to construct ballfields in Sweetwater Regional Park
(See Page 1 of the minutes)
24. MAYOR'S REPORT -- None
25. COUNCIL COMMENTS -- None
ADJOURNMENT at 11:00 p.m. to the Special Saturday Conference on February 7, 1981 at
8:00 a.m~ and to the meeting scheduled for February 10, 1981 at 7~00 p.m. and to the
Council Conference (extended) on February 11, 1981 at 3~00 p,m,
~ ie M. Fulasz, CMC c~
~ity Clerk