Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1981/05/19 MINUTES OF A REGULAR ~ETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Tuesday, May 19, 1981 Council Chambers, Public Services Building ROLL CALL Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Scott, 6illow, Cox, McCandliss Councilmen absent: None Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Assistant City Manager Asmus, Development Services Administrator Robens The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hyde, followed by a moment of silent prayer. I. APPROVAl, OF MINUTES for the meeting of May 12, 1981 MSUC (McCandliss/Gillow) to approve the minutes as mailed. Councilman Cox abstained from voting since he was absent from that meeting. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY None 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS a. Aaron Mannis, 446 Jacaranda Drive, expressed disappointment that the Mayor would not be running for reelection. He described Mayor Hyde as the "best Mayor Chula Vista ever had"; and requested that Council consider dedication o£ a park in his honor. b. Frank Chidester, 38 East Donohoe Street, representing the Chula Vista Historical Society, presented the Council and City Manager with honorary membership cards in the Society in appreciation for their support of its formation. c. Billy Johnson, 394 "G" Street, a student at Chula Vista High School, invited Mayor Hyde to address his government class as guest speaker on June 2, 1981. Mayor Hyde accepted the invitation. d. Jerry Valk, 291Camino Vista Real, spoke in opposition to the proposal for a six screen theatre currently before the Redevelopment Agency and questioned the lack of the school district's response to the Pepper Tree Estates Subdivision. 4. WRITTEN CO~UNICATIONS a. Request for waiver of Sidewalk Sales and Displays Ordinance - Chamber of Commerce The City Manager received a request for waiver of the Sidewalk Sales and Displays Ordinance by the Town Centre Merchants Association for May 22 and 23 during Country Festival Week. MSUC (Cox/M¢Candliss) to approve the request, subject to staff conditions. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS Pd~D ORDINANCES 5. Public Hearing - Consideration of tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 81-7, Pepper Tree Estatea (Director of Planning) This being the time and place advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing. Referring to his written report, Director of Planning Peterson reported that the tentative subdivision map for Pepper Tree Estates subdivides a 7.3 acre property into 15 single family residential lots. The parcel which is presently in the unincorporated area is in the process off annexation to Chula Vista and is de- veloped with a single family dwelling. The developer proposes to develop the lots with a minimum lot size of 13,100 square feet and an average lot size of approximately one-third acre. City Council Meeting -2- May 19, 1981 Mr. Peterson commented that very little grading is proposed and that split con- struction will be used on lots with steeper sloping. The EIR projected a 10% increase in traffic which does not represent a substantial increase to the road system. The Planning Commission voted to unanimously recommend Council approval of the tentative map and to recommend that Council certify that EIR 81-2 has been prepared in compliance with all State and local guidelines. Additional discussion concerned proposed access to the tract at the intersection of Jacaranda Drive and Pepper Tree Drive, although several residents of Jacaranda prefer the entrance to be through Lots 14 and 15 (which front on Pepper Tree Drive). Thirteen of the lots will be served by a new cul-de-sac street proposed to he named Cook Court, and Lots 14 and 18 will be served by Pepper Tree Drive. Concerning sight distance at the intersection of Jacaranda and Pepper Tree, the Planning Director stated that the conclusion of the City Engineer and Traffic Safety Engineer is that Condition 5 of the Planning Commission Resolution be amended to read: "The developer shall provide for a sight distance from the inter- section of Jacaranda Drive and Pepper Tree Road east from Jacaranda Drive a distance of approximately 200 feet subject to the approval of the City Engineer." This re- quirement would be met by trimming and pruning of vegetation. Mr. Peterson displayed slides of the subject property and further commented on the sight distance requirement. During presentation of the slides, Council reported that all members had travelled to the subject area and were familiar with it; it was noted that the parcel is located in County zone RS4; the Planning Commission condition regarding trees requires approval of the City prior to removal of any trees within the travel ways of the private streets. In response to Council query, the Director of Planning addressed the proposed density indicating that there is not a substantial difference between the homes having im- mediate frontage on Jacaranda Drive and those within the tract, and that Rll0 prezoning is consistent with the General Plan. Councilwoman McCandliss commented on the l~oposed density in relation to E1 Rancho Vista and E1 Rio Vista. She pre- ferred that the density of the proposed homes be oriented to existing homes on Pepper Tree Drive rather than E1 Rancho Vista. Responding to Councilman Cox, staff commented that the Homeowners Association would be required to maintain the private street and the private portion of the sewer system. There was continued discussion related to the density of the project, traffic safety and trimming of shrubs to improve sight distance. Dale Combs, Architect, 325 W. Washington, San Diego, presented architectural renderings and related graphics depicting the custom design of the proposed homes. He commented on proportions of parcels in the surrounding area noting that 30 parcels are under one-half acre; 21 parcels are under one acre, but greater than one-half; and two parcels are larger than one acre. Mr. Combs discussed the architectural style of the homes and indicated that the New England character of the Hazel Goes Cook home would be retained throughout the development. Lots 14 and 15 will involve the most grading, partly to solve existing drainage problems. Re- maining grading will be accomplished to allow contouring of the land in a compromising manner to maintain as many trees as possible and to maintain the natural character of that area. Richard Grabhorn, 5585 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, representing Sholders and Sanford, Inc., Civil Engineers, addressed engineering concerns and concurred with the staff recommendation and Planning Commission recommendation, as amended, requiring a sight distance of 200 feet at the Jacaranda/Pepper Tree intersection. He also discussed the project's proposed density and clarified that split-pad construction would be utilized, as required by land form, rather than split-level construction as indicated in Mr. Peterson's staff report. He also advised Council that Jacaranda Drive is owned in fee by Adma and that property owners taking access from Jacaranda to their properties have an easement right granted by Mrs. Cook. Adma could not legally alter that intersection in order to provide access through Lots 14 and 15. Jack Mann, representing Adma, discussed the responsibility of Adma to prune and trim the vegetation at the intersection in order to meet the sight distance condition of the tentative map. He stated that Adma has reached agreement with the respective property owners and legally bound to perform under those agreements. City Council Meeting -3- May 19, 1981 Mr. Grabhorn addressed the density of the project, stating that it provides for a density of 2 dwelling units per acre. He stated that Jacaranda/Pepper Tree intersection was selected by the developers for ingress and egress for well identified reasons: it requires less grading; provides flatter street grades, less slope banks and scarring of the property would be necessitated; and it would preserve significant trees which would be an aesthetic benefit to the entire co~nunity. In addition, he stated that Adma has no authority to hamper or close that street as a result of the easements granted by Mrs. Cook to area owners. Concluding his presentation, Mr. Grabhorn requested reconsideration of Condition 8 of the Planning Commission requiring the developer to construct curb and gutter improvements on Pepper Tree Drive along 145 feet of frontage of the subdivision, indicating that that would be the only curb and gutter in the entire subdivision and would be out of character. As an alternative, Adma would offer to waive any right of protest of a future assessment for improvement of Pepper Tree. Roger W. Krauel, 225 W. Broadway, San Diego, representing several property owners in the area of the project, spoke in opposition to the present design of the project because of the unsafe intersection at Pepper Tree and Jacaranda. He discussed the potential for increased traffic flow from Plaza Bonita Shopping Center, and referred to alternative approaches through Lots 14 and 15 considered in the Environmental Impact Report. Also speaking in opposition to the subdivision: Lawrence Lassman, 471 Jacaranda Drive opposed lot sizes and density, and the annexation of the area; Evelyn Sevel, 144 Pepper Tree Road, spoke in opposition to the density, traffic flow, annexation, and distributed to the Council a petition signed by approximately 150 area residents. Additional public comment related to the proposed 24 foot width of Jacaranda Drive and whether it would provide adequate turning radius for fire apparatus. Dr. Aaron Mannis commented on the subdivision and referred to his letter to Council specifically regarding the natural beauty of the subject area. He opposed the development because it would jeopardize the last remaining virgin ]and in Chula ¥ista; Ben Layton, 430 Jacaranda, spoke in opposition to the development and to the annexation of his property. There was continued discussion and rebuttal by Messrs Grabhorn, Krauel, Combs, and Jack Mann, representing Adma. Mr. Mann specifically addressed Council speak- ing to protection of the rights of property owners by infringing on the rights of Adma. He discussed the restrictions of the CC&R's on types of homes to be built, indicating that Adma's CC&R's are more restrictive and of beneflt to the property owners than existing CC&R's. Council recessed at 8:48 p.m. and reconvened at 8:55 p.m. In response to Council query, Mr. Petersen advised that the Fire Marshal has endorsed the tentative map. He also commented that the annexation as proposed would not create an island, as referred to by Mr. Layton. Responding to Mayor Hyde, Mr. Peterson commented against a proposed alternate entrance between Lots 14 and 15 because it ~oul8 require additional grading and cutting into the hillside. In additional discussion, the City Englneer recommended against walver of Condition 8 o£ the Planning Ce~ission resolution, but indicated that the condition could be deferred by execution of an agreement by Adma to not protest the formation of 1911 improvement district in the future. There being no further comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. MS (Hyde/Scott) for discussion to consider access from Jacaranda Drive to a new alignment between Lots 14 and 15 and that Jacaranda be closed off to mitigate the traffic impact, and by separate action of the Planning Commission to consider pre- zoning the property Rlli-P requiring that average lot sizes not be less than 15,000 square feet. An additional requirement to be included in the motion would be that an architectural review committee have complete site plan review and control of any future development. City Council Meeting -4- May 19, 1981 There was additional Council discussion concerning density; access through Lots 14 and 15 and egress therefrom without the necessity of backing out. Staff com- mented concerning granting reciprocal access easements in Lots 14 and 15. MS (Hyde/Scott) that the map be approved subject to the conditions required by the Planning Commission resolution, in addition to (1) revision of the map to permit no parcels of less than 15,000 square feet, and (2) requiring that access into the property be between Lots 14 and 15, and (3) requiring that any properties fronting on Pepper Tree Drive be designed with hammerhead or circular driveways. The motion was amended with the consent of the second to include a cul-de-sac on Jacaranda Drive at the point where it currently enters Pepper Tree. Councilman Gillow asked to further amend the motion with the additional require- ment that density be lowered to require minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. The motion was accordingly amended with the consent of the second. The motion as amended failed by the following vote: Gillow, McCandliss voting "yes" and Hyde, Scott and Cox voting "no". Additional lengthy discussion related to modification of the Planning Commission resolution to accommodate a prezoning change to Rll5 and thereby lowering the density and the number of lots to be subdivided to 14. Charles Strong, Traffic Engineer with Fedart Associates, reported that the safe sight distance arrived at by using the standard technical calculations is 175 feet. MSUC (Scott/Hyde) that staff ascertain that 175 to 200 feet is a safe sight distance prior to approval of the Final Map. MSC (Scott/Hyde) to direct staff to consider prezoning of the area to Rll5-P to permit no more than 14 parcels in the subdivision; that the eastern side of Jacaranda Drive be widened and improved to allow for parking; and that access to parcels 14 and 15 from Pepper Tree be provided by way of hammerhead er circular driveways. Councilman Gillow voted "ne". MSUC (Hyde/Scott) that the matter of prezoning on this property and adjacent properties that are designated Rll0 be referred to staff and the Planning Commission for consideration of a new prezoning to Rlli. MSUC (McCandliss/Scott) that as major trees are removed in the construction of hemes that they be replaced with species to be approved by staff. a. Resolution # - ~pprov.ing tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 81-7, Pepper Tree Estates The City Attorney advised that a revised resolution will be prepared and presented for reconsideration at the May 26 Council meeting. 6. Public hearing - Consideration ef request to waive utility undergrounding requirements for the Gersten property east of Hidden Vista Village Subdivision (Continued from the meeting e£ May 5, 1981) (City Engineer) This being the time and place advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing. City Engineer Lippitt reported that the Gersten Company, in conjunction with Watt Industries and San Diego Gas and Electric, requested waiver of the undergrounding requirement with respect to relocation of an existing 69 KV power line extending easterly from Hidden Vista Village Subdivision across Gersten's property. This relocation is necessary to avoid conflict of the proposed alignment of East "H" Street and Otay Municipal Water District's proposed 18" water line installation. This hearing was continued from May 5~ pending the outcome of the May 14th meeting of Environmental Review Committee which determined that ne significant environmental affects would occur by relocation of the line and that no further analysis would be necessary. Mr. Lippitt stated that the cost to underground the line is estimated at $1,400,000, while the cost of the relocation as estimated by SDG&E is $180,000. City Council Meeting -5- May 19 ~ 1981 Dick Brown, representing the Gersten Company, addressed Council with respect to a 5-year waiver and advised that they have agreed to advance the funds needed at this time significantly out of sequence with both Otay's proposed installation and the future alignment of East "H" Street. He emphasized that timing is critical and that if Council were to adopt a resolution next week, Gersten would present a check to SDG&E and the process could begin. Additional discussion related to Gersten applying some of the savings realized by relocation of the line to the future construction of the "H" Street improvements. MSUC (Cox/Gillow) to direct staff to return next week with a resolution waiving undergrounding requirements for the Gersten Company, such waiver to expire in five years. 7. Public hearing - Consideration of tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 81-6, Otay Valley Industrial Park, 500 block Otay Valley Road (Director of Planning) This being the time and place advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing. Mr. Peterson reviewed the characteristics of the tentative subdivision map and reported that the applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 29 industrial lots which are proposed to be served by three new streets. He reported that the site will require extensive grading consisting of 440,000 cubic yards of cut and fill and that the proposed street alignments, street grades and grading for the industrial park will provide a logical development pattern for future improvement of the adjoining property which the applicant unsuccessfully attempted to acquire for inclusion in the subdivision. Planning Commission Resolution PCS-81-6 unanimously recommends Council approval of the tentative map, which includes a provision allow- ing the applicant to request formation of a reimbursement district for repayment of offsite improvements which will benefit other properties. Eugene Cook, representing E. F. Cook & Associates, Ltd., 5858 Mt. Alifan Drive, San Diego, advised that economic analyses completed for the Park indicate that redesign is necessary, and he requested the opportunity to submit the redesign to the Planning Commission. There being no further conunents either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. a. Resolution # - Approving tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 81-6, Otay Valley Industrial Park MSUC (Scott/Cox) to send this item back to the Planning Commission and request redesign of the Industrial Park. 8. Public hearing - Consideration of change of zone for 290 "H" Street and adjacent lots from R-3 to C-0 (Director of Planning) This being the time and place advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing. This hearing involves a request for rezoning a .49 acre parcel located at 290 "H" Street from R-3 to C-O-P, in addition to rezoning the two parcels located immediately to the west and contiguous to the subject property to C-O. The Director of Planning reported that the properties are located where two land use designations coincide and can be considered consistent with the General Plan if zoned either commercially or residentially. He explained that the owner plans to develop the three lots into a mid-rise office complex and it would therefore be appropriate to zone the property to accommodate office and professional uses which are compatible with multiple family residential uses. Mayor Hyde acknowledged receipt of a letter distributed to Council and staff by Anush Badii, lessee of the property and co-signer of the application for zone change, withdrawing his application. Anush Badii, 225 Broadway, San Diego, advised Council that since distributing the letter he has met with the property owners; he withdrew the letter and re- quested a two week postponement of the hearing. City Council Meeting -6- May 19, 1981 Jean Campbell, owner of 290 "H" Street, informed Council that problems have arisen and she also requested a two week continuance. ~^-~ being ~ ~"~+~ ~ .... +" ~+~ ~ .... against, +~^ hearing .......... d a. Ordinance # - Rezoning .49 acre of 290 "H" Street from R-3 to C-O-P and .32 acre adjacent to the west from R-3 to C-O (First reading) MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to grant a two week postponement of the hearing. 9. Public hearing - Consideration to increase certain rates for Mission Cable Television, Inc. (Cox Cable San Diego) (Director of Finance) This being the time and place advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing. Director of Finance Grant reported that Cox Cable San Diego submitted a request to increase the basic subscriber rates in the City from $9.60 to $10.50 per month effective July 1, 1981. It was noted that the City and County of San Diego ap- proved the new rate based upon provisions in their ordinances allowing a limited increase based upon 60% of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) formula; however, the Council, in approving a rate increase last year, did not adopt the CPI formula. James Smith, Vice President and General Manager of Mission Cable TV, gave a synopsis of the increased costs of operating the system, particularly noting the S0.6% increase in the cost of utilities experienced over the past year. Responding to questions from Councilman Scott regarding availability of financial statements from Mission Cable, Mr. Smith advised that he did not come prepared to report on the company's financial position and that financial statements were not available for review. After continued discussion, he informed Council that Mission Cable's rate of return was close to last year's, but that it was eroding quickly because of the rapidly increasing costs of operation. There being no further comments either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. a. Resolution # - Amending Resolution 10087 to increase rates for Mission Cable Television, Inc. (Cox Cable San Diego) MSUC (Scott/Hyde) to continue the hearing for two weeks and direct staff to obtain additional information to provide a basis for a decision to approve a rate increase. 10. Public hearing - Consideration of establishing Underground Utility District No. 114 on Fourth Avenue from "G" Street to "H" Street (City Engineer) This being the time and place advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing. The City Engineer reported that the Underground Utility Advisory Committee at its last meeting discussed possible underground projects for 1982 and voted to recom- mend to Council consideration of the Fourth Avenue conversion from "G" Street to "H" Street. This project will complete undergrounding of the major streets in Town Centre Area 1 and Area 2 and, since Fourth Avenue between "G" and "H" Streets is being considered for future pavement overlay in FY 1982-83, it would be pre- ferred to accomplish the undergrounding project prior to the overlay. There being no further comments either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. MSUC (CJi]ow/Scott) to direct staff to bring back a resolution establishing the Underground Utility District after it considers the CiP Program in Budget Session. City Cotmcil:Meeting -7- May 19, 1981 CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 11 through 14) MSUC (Scott/Hyde) to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item ll. 12. Resolution #10460 - Accepting public improvements, Melrose Villas Subdivision (City Engineer) The resolution accepts public improvements constructed by Biddle Chula Vista, Ltd. for Melrose Villas Subdivision. The work was inspected on April 28 and found to be completed in compliance with contract specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13. Resolution #10461 - Approving final ~ap and subdivision improvement agreement for Chula Vista Tract No. 80-4, Twin Oaks Condominiums (City Engineer) The Resolution approves the Final Map for Chula Vista Tract No. 80-4, which has been found to be in conformity with the Tentative Map previously approved by the Council on November 20, 1979, (Res. 98S0). The Subdivider has submitted all required documents and paid all fees. 14. Resolution #10462 - Releasing lien agreement for Chula Vista Tract 80-8, Park Way Place (City Engineer) The City Engineer reported that the developer was required to pay to the City the cost of drainage improvements at Park Way and accordingly a lien agreement was executed as a condition of approval of the Final Map. The developer's obligation has been fully satisfied. 11. Resolution #10463 - Providing for the special appropriation of funds for settlement of the Silvia Condemnation Action in the amount of $4,857.32 (City Attorney) The resolution approves an appropriation of $4,857.32 as additional compensation pursuant to Judicial order for settlement of the Telegraph Canyon Road right-of- way acquisition from Joseph $ilvia (Archway Inn). RESOLUTION OFFERED BY b~YOR HYDE, the reading of the text was waived b7 unanimous consent, passed and approved by the following vote: Ayes: Hyde, Gillow, Cox, McCandliss; Noes: Scott. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING 15. Resolution #10464 - Accepting bids and awarding contract for construction of Chula Vista Transit Center and assigning contract and delegation of duties to SCOOT (Development Services Admini- strator) Development Services Administrator Robens reported that sealed bids were received £or construction of the Chula Vista Transit Center at Woodlawn Avenue and "H" Street from five contractors and that Dyne Construction, San Diego, submitted the low bid in the amount of $121,103.38. He advised that the SCOOT Board accepted the assignment of the contract and delegation of duties from the City and recommended that Council award the contract to Dyne Construction and assign the contract to SCOOT. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLISS; the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 16. Resolution #1046S - Transferring funds in the Block Grant Program for demolition purposes (Community Development Director) On May 7. 1981, the Redevelopment Agency approved a schedule for demolition of the buildings in the Town Centre Focus Area and requested that $110,000 of Community Development Block Grant funds be transferred to a new demolition account. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILM~ SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by unan- imous consent, passed and approved unanimously. City Council Meeting -8- May 19, 1981 RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING (Continued) 17. Resolution #10466 - Ordering a report for Town Centre No. 1 Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District 1981/82 (City Engineer) Mr. Lippitt requested that Council approve preparation of a report for the Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District on Third Avenue between "E" Street and "G" Street and explained that the report represents the initial procedure in reestablishing the district for next fiscal year. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN GILLOW; the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 18. RESOLUTION #10467 - Approving an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego to provide senior information and referral services to the South Bay area during FY 1981-82 (Director of Parks and Recreation) The Director of Parks and Recreation reported that the City of Chula Vista has been operating the South Bay Senior Information and Referral Center for the past three years and presented a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an agree- ment to operate the Center for the fourth year, beginning July 1, 1981. He provided the following information regarding revenue sources: Area Agency on Aging Grant Funds $ 28,937 Community Development Block Grant Funds 10,070 In-Kind Services 5,130 Community Development Block Grant Local Option Funds 10,770 Total Revenues $ 54,907 RESOLUTION OFFERED 8Y COUNCILMAN COX; the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved. CounciLwoman McCandliss abstained from voting. CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 19. Ordinance - Adding a new Title 20 to Chula Vista Municipal Code entitled "Energy Conservation" - First Reading (Director o£ Building and Housing) - Continued from meeting of May 12, 1981 At the May 12 Council meeting, Director of Building and Housing Grady detailed the action of the Resources Conservation Commission recommending adoption of the Solar Energy Ordinance a5 presented to Council. Subsequently, aEter hearing testimony of attorney Eldon Clawson, representing the Swimming Pool Technical Committee, and Dick Brown, representing the Gersten Company, Council continued the item so that the ordinance could be reevaluated in light of additional inform- ation to be obtained by the City Attorney in consultation with Mr. Clawson. MSUC (Hyde/Scott) to continue the ordinance for one week. 20. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER a. City Manager Cole distributed the Redevelopment Agency agenda packets for the meeting of Thursday, May 21, 1981. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS 21. Report on request for revision to £hula Vista Sign Ordinance (Director of Planning) Director of Planning Peterson reported that a request was submitted on April 28 from A1Wylie's Sign Associates requesting that the City modify its zoning ordinance to permit placement of directional signs within the City £or subdivisions located outside of the City limits and to increase the maximum size. He commented that the City of Chula Vista's ordinance is the most restrictive as to size and that of all County jursio~ctions which allow directional signs for subdivisions, none permit them for subdivisions located outside of the respective city. City Council Meeting -9- May 19, 1981 REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPART~ENTS HEADS (Continued) 21. MSUC (McCandliss/Scott) to file the request. Mayor Hyde directed that staff communicate Council's action to A1Wylie's Sign Associates. 22. Report on Amendment No. 2 to "Agreement between SCOOT and the County of San Diego for Public Transportation Services, FY 1979-80" (Development Services Administrator) Mr. Robens reported that on May 13, 1981, the SCOOT Board approved Amendment No. 2 to its agreement with the County to provide public transportation service in cer- tain portions of the County served by Chula Vista Transit (CVT). The amendment reflects increased costs resulting from an increase in the annual miles operated in the County; an increase of $.30 in the gross cost per mile; and a decrease in total passengers carried due to elimination of Route 707. MSUC (Hyde/Scott) to accept the report. 23. ~YOR'S REPORT a. Mayor Hyde reported on his trip to Las Vegas with City Manager Cole and Community Development Director Desrochers to meet with representatives of Walker-Scott, Sears and Roebuck and Carter-Hawley-Hale regarding expansion of Chula Vista Shopping Center. He reported that the schedule will be delayed for at least one year due to the unwillingness of Sears and Roebuck to agree to the project at this time. b. Mayor Hyde requested ratification of his appointment of Betty Roche to the Serra Library Systems Advisory Board. MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to ratify the appointment. c. Mayor Hyde requested Council ratification of his appointment oF Margaret Pietrzak to the Human Relations Commission. MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to ratify the appointment. d. Mayor Hyde appointed Jose Viesca to the International Friendship Commission and requested Council ratification· MSUC (McCandliss/Scott) to ratify the appointment. e. Mayor Hyde appointed Gary Augustine to the Resources Conservation Commission and requested ratification. MSUC (Scott/Cox) to ratify the appointment. 24. COUNCIL COM3tENTS a. Legislative Committee Report: Recommendation on AB 1743 - County Overhead Charge~ Councilman Cox reported on AB 1743 which would restrict the amount a county can charge for providing contract services to any city within the county. He reported that the County Board of Supervisors has opposed the bill on the basis that establishing charges should remain a subject of local control. The League of California Cities has taken a neutral position on the bill and he recommends that Council adopt a neutral stance also. MSUC (Cox/Scott) to take a neutral position regarding Ag 1743 with the understanding that this position be changed to one of opposition if it is later broadened to include contracts between cities or to include fees. ADJOURNMENT at 10;45 p.m. to the Budget Session scheduled for Wednesday, May 20 at 4 p.m.; Thursday, May 21 at 7 p.m.; and to the regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, May 26 at 7 p.m. JENNIS M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK Ellzali~th W Cont[, Beputy City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOURNmeNT OF .NIEETING CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Jennie M. Fulasz, being first duly sworn depose and say : That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of %he City of Chula Vista; That the__regular adjourned meeting of the Council of the City of Chula Vista was held Tuesday, May 19, 1981 and said meeting was adjourned to the time and place specified in the order of adjournment ATTACHED HERETO: That on May 2~, 1981 at ~he hour of 10~30 a.m. I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said me~ting of May 19, ]981 was held. '' /~cit~Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary Public in and for said Coun%y and State of California MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Mawr 19, 1981 The City Council met in the Council Chamber at the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7:00 .p.m. with the following Councilmen present: Mayor H}rde. Councilmen Scott. Gillow. Cox. McCandli~.s Councilmen absent: NQ~ ADJOURNMENT The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m. until Wednesday nay 20, 1981 at 4:00 .p.m. in the Council Conference Room, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. I, Jennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk of %he Cify of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order by the City Council at the meeting of May 19, 1981 JE~qlE M. FULASZ, CM~, C~TY ~fLERK~ City of Chula Vista, California