Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1981/05/26 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Tuesday, May 26, 1981 Council Chambers, Public Services Building ROLL CALL Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Scott, Gillow, Cox, M¢Candliss Councilmen absent: None Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Assistant City Manager Asmus, Development Services Administrator Robens The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hyde, followed by a moment of silent prayer. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES for the Budget Review Sessions of May 16 and 18, 1981 and the regular meeting of May 19, 1981. MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to approve the minutes as mailed. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY - None 3. ORAL CO~M~JNICATIONS a. Lawrence Lassman, Joyce Layton and Aaron Mannis, all residents of Jacaranda Drive, requested reopening of the Pepper Tree Estates public hearing. Mayor Hyde responded that the request would be taken under advisement when that item is reached on the agenda. b. Donald Linn, 1744 Ithaca Street, Chairman of Troop 871, Latter Day Saints, requested permission to paint house numbers on curbs for fund raising. During discussion, questions were raised concerning length of time permission would remain effective and how often the organization would have to return to renew the request. MSUC (Scott/Gillow) to direct staff to bring the ordinance back for review by the Council to determine whether the City should add a one year effective period for permits. MSUC (McCandliss/Gillow) to grant permission to Troop 871 to raise funds by paint- ing curbs contingent on any staff conditions. 4. WRITTEN COk~dUNICATIONS a. Claim against the City Four claims were filed against the City by Richard Whalen on behalf of four in- dividuals (driver and three passengers)Barbara Blackston, Lisa Gates, Pam Keblish and Rhonda Cox for $25,000 each resulting from an automobile accident on March 14, 1981, in the 600 block of "G" Street. Since the conditions that existed at the time were not constructed or maintained by the City, there is questionable liability on the part of the City and it is recommended that the claims be denied. MSUC (McCandliss/Gillow) to deny all four claims. b. Letter from Roger W. Krauel re Pepper Tree Estates A letter has been received from Roger W. Krauel, attorney representing opponents of the Pepper Tree Estates subdivision for reconsideration of approval of the tentative subdivision map. The City Attorney advised Council that the rights of ail parties to due process have been observed and Council can proceed at its discretion to approve or disapprove the resolution under ~tem 19. MSUC (Hyde/McCandliss) to file the letter. City Council Meeting -2- May 26, 1981 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELAT£D RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 5. RESOLUTION 10468 - Certifying Environmental Impact Report EIR-79-2 (Bonita Long Canyon Estates) (Director of Planning) Director of Planning Peterson reviewed his staff report and the background of Planning Commission consideration of the Environmental Impact Report for Bonita Long Canyon Estates since its initial submission in 1979. At that time Council denied certification of the EIR and the applicant has now submitted a Sectional Planning Area plan for the overall development of the property, along with a tentative subdivision map for Phase I. Applicant's current submission involves several revisions to the plan submitted in 1979. Mr. Peterson summarized the major revisions to the plan and reported that on March 19, 1981, the Environmental Review Committee met and concluded that the project revisions would not result in any significant environmental impact which was not addressed in 1979. The Planning Commission recertified the Environmental Impact Report on April 22, 1981, and accordingly recommends Council certification. Mr. Peterson introduced Dr. Richard Glenn, representing MSA, the consulting firm which prepared the EIR. Dr. Glenn discussed the major revisions to the EIR as pre- pared in 1979 and referred to the Sectional Planning Area map which was displayed. He commented that the EIR could be challenged because of its age, and addressed each major characteristic of the plan. Specific discussion related to inclusion of retention basins to mitigate the drainage problems; traffic circulation; and property tax revenue projections of approximately $130,000. He commented that at the time of preparation of the initial EIR the effect of Proposition 13 on property tax revenues was not known; consequently, it was determined to have a very small effect on the EIR projections. John Reese, representing the Sweetwater Community Planning Group, expressed concern regarding the deletion of "H" Street and the capacity of the retention basins. He stated that information was not available to address those issues in sufficient detail in the EIR and requested that Council consider them in greater detail before certifying the EIR. Martha McDonald, 4425 Acacia Avenue, President, Long Canyon Homeowner's Association, referred to the Executive Summary of the EIR in which it states that the control of existing off-site flooding is the jurisdiction of the County, and noted that the jurisdiction belongs to both the City and the County. Council discussed tho jurisdiction of the area and it was pointed out that the improved portion of the drainage channel located within Bonita Ridge Estates was annexed to the City of Chula Vista as a portion of that subdivision. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY Mayor Hyde~ the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously, 6a. Public Hearing - Consideration of Sectional Planning Area Plan for 650 acre Bonita Long Canyon Estates (Director of Planning) This being the time and place advertised, Mayor Hyde opened the public hearing, and declared that items 6a, b and c would be taken together in one discussion. Mr. Peterson commented that the Bonita Long Canyon development has never been formally before Council; however, in 1979 Council considered whether or not any development on the 650 acre site should be allowed. The decision then was that development should not be allowed in that it was premature because of the west to east development policy adopted as part of the Specific Plan for E1 Rancho del Rey. Since the property was in the County, the developer then approached the County Board of Supervisors who determined that the property could be developed as a current urban development area. Council attempted to dissuade the Board of Supervisors~ but was unsuccessful. Subsequently, Council recognized that develop- ment would take place, and agreed that it would be appropriate at such time as the Council approved a development plan and schedule for the construction of "H" Street between 1-805 and Otay Lakes Road. The developer proceeded to prepare a plan for "H" Street which Council adopted in November, 1980, and is now submitting the Sectional Planning Area plan and Tentative Map for Phase I. City Council Meeting -3- May 26, 1981 Principal Planner Lee reviewed the applicant's submission of a Sectional Planning Area plan for the development of the 650 acre Bonita Long Canyon Estates located on the east side of Otay Lakes Road and south of the Bonita Highlands subdivision in Bonita. The proposed Sectional Planning Area Plan contains a 15-acre elementary school site; an Il-acre park site; a 4-acre multiple family site; 809 single family lots with 56 condominium units; and approximately 266 acres of dedicated open space, most of which is to remain in its natural state. Applicant proposes to develop the 865 dwelling units in si× phases within the development; 40% of the site will be retained in dedicated open space, with the most intense area of development in Phase I where over 70% of the area is to be graded for single family lots. Supplemental tree planting in certain canyon areas and planting of fire retardant material will be required as a condition of tentative map approval. Substantial off-site improvements will be required with each phase of construction, and will involve improvement of "H" Street (onsite and offsite), Otay Lakes Road, Canyon Drive and connection of Corral Canyon Road to "H" Street when the third and fourth phases are developed. Mr. Lee commented on the elementary school site stating that the nearby schools are at capacity and the development will generate an estimated 500 students. He advised Council that the school district is reluctant to make a commitment at this time and that a final disposition will be made when a subdivision map is processed for Phase III, The plan involves existing equestrian trails which connect with the SDG&E primary east/west trail system as well as adjacent County trails. Minor adjustments to the system, including required protective fencing, limited grading and corral locations will be considered with each tentative map filed on the various phases. Applicant will be required to file CC&R's with the City prohibiting splitting or resubdivision of any lot. Applicant has made inquiries regarding annexation; however, no application has been filed. Staff recommends annexation before final map approval is given to Phase I. 6b. Public Hearing - Consideration of tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 81-4, Bonita Long Canyon Estates Mr. Lee commented on the tentative subdivision map known as Bonita Long Canyon Estates which involves 81.S acres located north and east of Bonita Vista High School. The map calls for development of 199 single family residential lots and one open space lot. The subject property is bounded by the Bonita Hacienda sub- division, Bonita Vista High School, Southwestern College Estates Unit 3 and the extension of East "H" Street. Density of the proposed development is 2.44 dwelling units per gross acre; the lots will be developed with conventional single family detached homes. The project will require extensive grading, consisting of approxi- mately ?00,000 cubic yards of fill. Mr. Lee commented that the proposed grading will fill a portion of Tiffany Park, in order to provide for the extension of East "H" Street; however, the developer will be required to restore the disturbed portion of the park which is estimated to be one acre. 6c. Public Hearing - Consideration of Candidate CEQA findings for Bonita Long Canyon Estates In his written report to Council, Director of Planning Peterson advised that the final EIR (79-2) for this project concluded that there was a potential for signifi- cant environmental impact, therefore requiring that CEQA findings be prepared in accordance with State EIR guidelines. The candidate CEQA findings recommend specific mitigation measures which will reduce the impacts noted in the EIR to a level of insignificance, and it is accordingly recommended that Council accept the CEQA findings and adopt them by the resolution presented as item 7c. Councilman Scott referred to the construction of Phase I of "H" Street and re- quested that staff update the status of that project in relation to the CIP. City Engineer Lippitt responded that portion of the CIP pertaining to early implementation of construction of Phase I o£ "H" Street (two lanes) between the Wart's development and the existing portion o£ "H" Street near Otay Lakes Road is scheduled for Budget Review May 2? and that Council may consider con- tributing the City's portion or more in order to commence the project sooner than would be possible if a standard scheduling were followed. City Council Meeting -4- May 26, 1981 Responding to Councilman Cox, Mr. Lippitt commented that the City's contribution for the extension of "H" Street for two lanes of pavement, half the median, plus the portion the City would have built in the Watt Development approximates $750,000. He indicated that the contribution would be higher if the City were to commence improvements sooner, but that it would be reimbursed as development proceeded. Mr. Lee commented that the 650 acres would add approximately 5% to the City's total land area; he discussed phasing of the project and commented that the rationale for the phasing was primarily related to the developer's scheduling program. He noted that the SPA plan is setting parameters for future development in the area and will establish lot patterns, circulation, grading and location of open space. Specific discussion related to the drainage plan, since three-quarters of the area drains into Long Canyon out Acacia Avenue. The system proposed is a retention basin design subject to review by the Engineering Department. The system originally proposed was designed to improve the drainage system downstream from Acacia to the golf course. That estimate has reached $700,000. The system contemplated now is designed to reduce flow during peak storm periods and to reduce siltation. Referring to the school district, discussion related to the district's inability to make a commitment at this time because of reduced State aid resulting From declining student enrollments. Mr. Lee discussed traffic circulation and commented that additional segments will be constructed on roads which are operating at capacity. Phase I will involve the extension of "H" Street to 0ray Lakes Road and improvements to Otay Lakes Road to provide four lane capacity; Phase II will have access directly out to Otay Lakes Road; Phases 3 and 4 will require the extension of Corral Canyon Road from the north down to "H" Street and will require improvements on Central Avenue to provide four lane capacity on Central Avenue. The developer may be responsible for the portion of Rutgers Avenue extending north of Gotham up to "H" Street. If "H" Street is not completed from 1-805 to Otay Lakes Road, then tbe extension of Rutgers Street should be constructed to provide a ]ink to Telegraph Canyon Road. Additional discussion related to Street S and the need for a connecting point between the City and County area to provide a more direct route for people traversing the development to get to Bonita through Dulconia (if constructed) to the north out to Central Avenue. Continued discussion related to the SDG&E easement. Mr. Lee recommended that a waiver be considered for the undergrounding of the 69 KV line when the maps for development of the area are submitted for approval. in response to Council queries related to the retention basin system, Mr. Lippitt commented that the conditions in the Planning Commission resolution are that the developer will contribute toward improving the downstream system or submit for approval an alternate plan for retention basins. Similar to a reservoir, a re- tention basin is used to hold water during peak flows 5o that areas downstream collect the same amount of water retained in the basin over an extended period of time. Approval for the drainage plans would be considered at the same time as the final map for the first phase of construction. Siltation during the con- struction would be the responsibility of the developer; however, when the development is completed and siltation is at a minimum, maintenance will be the responsibility of the open space district. Council commented on the lack of commitment from the school district and staff noted that the developer is dedicating the area for the school site and that the district can require installation of portable facilities. Through development of Phases I and II, it is anticipated that the district will be placing portable facilities on the 5ire as deemed necessary to meet the enrollments. In response to Council query, the City Traffic Engineer commented on the impact of additional traffic on the intersection at Otay Lakes Road and Bonita Road. Recent counts of trip generation at that intersection and at Bonita Center East indicate that that intersection will operate at an acceptable level of capacity. The impact on Telegraph Canyon Road, until it is widened to four lanes, of any development in the area could be significant. City Council Meeting -5- May 26, 1981 Dick Brown, representing the applicant, the Gersten Company, stated that during the planning of this project he met with the Sweetwater Planning Group and the Long Canyon Homeowner's Association and all parties wishing to receive information regarding the project. He added that the plan reflects input of the neighbors and that many changes have been made as a result of discussions with the homeowners. Mr. Brown addressed the drainage problems cited and requested that Gersten's con- sulting engineer, Joe Prolifca, discuss the hydrology and the retention basin plan. Joe Prolifca, Principal Engineer with Boyle Engineering, advised Council that a preliminary draft of the hydrology report has been prepared which provides informa- tion on the flood peak flows and volumes of floods for storms of various return periods. The draft has been presented to representatives of the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego for review and consideration. He explained that this study includes a hydrologic analysis for conditions at the present time, and a separate analysis has been prepared for the run-off on the basis of the development proposed in the Bonita Long Canyon development, and in addition, a third analysis was made on the basis of the ultimate development of the water shed. He stated that all three analyses were completed to determine what the change in run-off would be as a result of the development since mitigation measures must be planned for the conditions which will exist Jn the future. After these studies were completed, the use of floodwater retarding reservoirs at two locations was considered to be effective. It was determined that flood peaks that could occur as the result of ultimate development could be reduced by S0% with only one reservoir. In addition, it was determined that this method would reduce flood flows occurring under existing conditions by approximately one-third. Use of flood-water retarding reservoirs also would help control sedimentation downstream. He noted that the major sedimentation problems characteristically occur during existing conditions and are reduced to 1/10 with mature urban development. Referring the staff's written report, Mr. Brown explained that discussion of three retention basins was considered at the time when three developments were considered. In addition, he addressed the adequacy of the EIR, emphasizing that all changes made will reduce the impacts noted in the 1979 EIR. He addressed the $700,000 cost of downstream improvements, connnenting that Gersten will pay its proportional share of the cost. Mr. Brown sunmaarized his presentation, stating that two issues remain unresolved. He requested that Phase IV, currently approved for 20 units, be approved for 40 units, and that a maximum density not be established until the precise plan is approved. Referring to condition 23b of the Planning Commission resolution, Mr. Brown stated that Gersten is required to construct the south side of East "H" Street from Rutgers to the existing improvements, in addition to the requirement of constructing the north side of East "H" Street as it abuts Gersten's property and an additional 1300 feet as it abuts the school district property. Since they do not expect reimbursement from the school district for that construction, and have substantial requirements for improvements to Central Avenue and Otay Lakes Road and the drainage system, he requested deletion of the requirement to construct the south side of "H" Street. He added that Gersten would be willing to construct the connection of "H" Street to Rutgers on the condition that they be reimbursed. Responding to Council questioning, Mr. Brown commented that the first phase of construction will begin as soon as all approvals are obtained and would take approximately five years to complete. Councilman Cox expressed concern regarding traffic when later phases are commenced and asked Mr. Brown if Gersten would be willing to work with the City to expedite completion of at least two lanes of "H" Street, Mr. Brown responded that Gersten is prepared to commence relocation of the 69 KV line and design of the "H" Street improvements immediately upon receipt of the waiver scheduled as item 15 on the agenda. Council commented on the possibility of including low-moderate income housing in the subdivision. Mr. Brown noted that the high construction costs of the develop- ment would most likely preclude development of low cost housing. Council recessed at 9:22 p.m. and reconvened at 9:32 p.m. City Council Meeting -6- May 26, 1981 Mayor Hyde read a petition submitted by Kathy Bernhard, 1655 ~4ills Street, signed by approximately 135 area residents, protesting the SPA plan and the tentative map because of increased traffic and student populations resulting from the sub- division. The document was submitted to the City Clerk to become a part of the record o£ this proceeding. Martha McDonald, President of the Bonita Long Canyon Homeowner's Association, addressed condition 11 regarding the Street S connection and requested that Council delete that condition to mitigate additional traffic on Acacia Avenue. She also spoke of the drainage problems as the primary concern of the Homeowner's Association and noted that the EIR documents the problem with reference in the Executive Summary to unresolved issues related to off-site flooding in Long Canyon. She distributed photographs of the drainage channel running behind the homes on Acacia; a map of the affected area; and a letter dated April 27, 1981 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency addressed to the County Planning Commission. Mrs. McDonald also commented that the County, as well as other agencies have recognized the Long Canyon area as a flood hazard area, and con- tinued to present testimony related to the EIR findings concerning drainage. In conclusion, she requested that specific conditions be added that drainage improvements be constructed as part of Phase I since drainage and siltation problems will start when construction is commenced. Speaking in opposition to the development and expressing concern over traffic, schools and drainage were: D. M. Cunna, 1641 Dartmouth Street; Martin Marugg, 1634 Mills Street; Fred Zobke, 778 Baylor; Pauline Marking, 4050 Acacia, who distributed a petition signed by 130 residents; Pete Schiff, 3911 Rock River Lane; William Virchis, 1604 Dartmouth; John Reese, 3579 Lomacitas, representing the Sweetwater Community Planning Group; Jerry Valk, 291Camino Vista Real. MSUC (Cox/Hyde) to amend condition 17 of Planning Commission Resolution 81-4 to specify that there shall not be an increase in peak flow due to the develop- ment of Phase [. Councilman Scott requested addition of language to condition 2lb of the Planning Commission resolution to require City Council approval of the drainage plans within Long Canyon basin and the method of solving the problems. MSUC (Scott/Hyde) to direct staff to rewrite condition 2lb of Planning Commission Resolution 81-13 to require Council approval subsequent to review of the City Engineer of plans for desilting basins and retention basins. MSUC (Hyde/Scott) to accept staff recommendation 1 revising condition 9a of Planning Commission Resolution PCM-81-13. MSUC (Hyde/McCandliss) to accept staff recommendation 2 to direct a letter to the Board of Supervisors requesting authorization of the street connection (Street S) to provide access for emergency vehicles. Council noted that a separate public hearing would be required prior to action on recommendation 3 waiving the underground requirement of the 69 KV line. MSUC (Hyde/Cox) to approve staff recommendation 4 modifying condition 23a of the Planning Commission Resolution 81-13. Mayor Hyde requested that Council consider Mr. Bro~'s request for 40 units in Phase VI and no motion was offered. Additional Council discussion related to the reimbursement district for improve- ments on the south side of "H" Street. Staff commented that Council could determine whether or not to participate at the time the district is established. Councilwoman McCandliss expressed concern over the question of requiring the developer to contribute to construction of schools in view of earlier discussions related to the school district's Financial problems. She commented that she could not support the resolution at this stage because of the unresolved questions related to the elementary school site and also because the City's west-to-east development policy still has not been satisfied at least in part by means of a construction schedule for "H" Street. City Council Meeting -7- May 26, 1981 MSUC (Hyde/Gillow) to delete condition 13 from Planning Commission Resolution 81-13 regarding waiver of the undergrounding requirement for the 69 KV line. There being no further comments either for or against, the bearing was declared closed. 7. Consideration of Resolutions pertaining to Bonita Long Canyon Estates a. RESOLUTION NO. 10469 - Approving Sectional Planning Area Plan for Bonita Long Canyon Estates The resolution approves the Sectional Planning Area for development of Bonita Long Canyon Estates. See item 6a ahoye. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY Mayor Hyde as amended, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved. Councilwoman McCandliss voted "no". b. RESOLUTION NO. 10470 - Approving tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 81-4, Bonita Long Canyon Estates. The resolution approves the tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 81-4, Bonita Long Canyon Estates, for development of 81.5 acres. See item 6b above. gESOLUTION OFFERED BY Councilman Cox as amended, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. c. RESOLUTION NO. 10471 - Adopting CEQA findings for Bonita Long Canyon Estates The resolution adopts Candidate CEQA findings for Bonita Long Canyon Estates which recommend specific mitigation measures to reduce impacts noted in the Environmental Impact Report certified for Bonita Long Canyon Estates (EIR-79-2). RESOLUTION OFFERED BY Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. MSUC (Hyde/Gillow) to continue the public hearings under 8, 9 and 10 of the agenda until the next regular Council. meeting. MSUC (Hyde/Scott) to defer all remaining agenda items, except items 15 and 19, until the next regular Council meeting. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 10472 - Approving conditional w~iver of undergrounding require- ment for Gersten Company's property east of Hidden Vista Subdivision (City Engineer) The subject waiver was considered at a public hearing held on May 19, 1981, and Council approved the request for waiver to expire in five years if the relocation of the line does not take place as planned in conjunction with the improvement of East "H" Street. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY Mayor Hyde, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 19. RESOLUTION - Approving tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 81-7, Pepper Tree Estates (Director of Planning) At the public hearing held May 19, 1981, Council considered approval of the tentative subdivision map for Pepper Tree Estates and directed staff to revise the resolution to impose certain conditions related to reducing the number of lots in the proposed subdivision to a maximum of 14 to establish density in accordance with R-i-iS-P zoning; to develop Jacaranda Drive at sufficient width to accommodate on-street parking on the east side as well as adequate traffic movements; to trim and/or remove vegetation east of the intersection of Jacaranda Drive to conform to appropriate engineering safety standards; to provide access to Pepper Tree Drive from Lots 14 and 15 through a common driveway and requiring a turn-around so that cars exiting the lots can do so without backing out; and to require the developer to enter into an agreement with the City regarding removal and replanting of trees within the subdivision. City Council Meeting -8- May 26, 1981 Mr. Lassman, Mr. Layton, Dr. Mannis and Ms. Sevel reiterated their requests that the hearing be reopened. The property owners gave presentations based upon in£ormation already considered by the Council, including density of the development; the extension of Jacaranda Drive; traffic safety hazards cited in the EIR. Following discussion, Mayor Hyde instructed Council to consider the request to reopen the hearing. There was no motion offered. No comment was offered by the applicant. Mr. Grabhorn, Civil Engineer representing Sholders and Sanford, reported that si× parking spaces have been incorporated on the east side of Jacaranda Drive; that there has been no change in street alignment; and noted that the Lassman house is substantially set back from the street so that the car lights exiting the area will not be a problem. Director of Planning Peterson distributed the revised map reflecting the change to 14 lots and commented on the revisions. After continued discussion, Development Services Administrator Robens and Mr. Peterson recommended continuance of the matter to review the revised map. MSUC (Scott/Hyde) to hold the matter over for one week for an opportunity to review the revised map. MSUC (Scott/Cox) to continue Council Comments to the Budget Session scheduled for May 27, 1981. MSUC (Scott/Gi. llow) to open the Budget Session at 4:30 p.m. rather than 4:00 p.m. as advertised. ADJOURNMENT at 11:25 p.m. to the Budget Review Session scheduled for Wednesday, May 27, 1981 at 4:30 p.m. JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK By:~ Deputy City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOURNmeNT OF MEE?ING CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Jennie M. Fulasz, being first duly sworn depose and say.: That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista; That the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Chula Vista was held Tuesday, May 26, 1981 and said meeting was adjourned to the time and place specified in the order of adjournment ATTACHED HERETO: That on Wednesday, May 27, 1981 at ~he hour of 8:20 a.m. I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said me~ting of May 26, 1981 was held. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary Public in and for said County and State of California MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Tuesday, May 26, 1981 The City Council met in the Council Chamber at the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7 ~.m. with the following Councilmen present: Mayor Hydet Councilmen Scott, Gillow, Cox, McCandliss Councilmen absent: None ADJOURN~LENT The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 11:25 ~.m. until Wednesday, __ May 27, 1981 at 4:30 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. I, Jennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order by the City Council at the meeting of Ma~; 26, 1981